Public Utility Master Plan (PUMP).pdf — Fairfield City Council, May 6, 2025 (part 4 of 5)

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

FG-SAMPLE
PUMP Sample Pump Pump Sample 4 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 18 Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Pump-31 Mechanical Systems 2012 WR-PMP-7 SUMP PUMP #1 (NORTH), RPS, WTP Pump Sump 19 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 12 Low
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-32 Mechanical Systems 1986 HL-PMP-4 HL-PMP-4, PUMP 4, VERTICAL TURBINE, HLPS, WTP Pump Vertical Turbine -7 Replace or Run to
Failure Reduced Capacity/Pressure 6 7 63 High
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-33 Mechanical Systems 1986 HL-PMP-P6 HighLift P1, VERTICAL TURBINE, Pump Vertical Turbine -7 Replace or Run to
Failure Reduced Capacity/Pressure 6 7 63 High
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-34 Mechanical Systems 1986 HL-PMP-P7 HL-PMP-P7, PUMP 2, VERTICAL TURBINE, HLPS, WTP Pump Vertical Turbine -7 Replace or Run to
Failure Reduced Capacity/Pressure 6 7 63 High
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-35 Mechanical Systems 1986 HL-PMP-P8 HL-PMP-P8, PUMP 3, VERTICAL TURBINE, HLPS, WTP Pump Vertical Turbine -7 Replace or Run to
Failure Reduced Capacity/Pressure 6 7 63 High
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-36 Mechanical Systems 2010 HL-PMP-5 HL-PMP-5, PUMP 5, VERTICAL TURBINE, HLPS, WTP Pump Vertical Turbine 17 Replace or Run to
Failure Reduced Capacity/Pressure 6 7 56 High
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-37 Mechanical Systems 2010 HL-PMP-6 HL-PMP-6, CFE SAMPLE PUMP, GRUNDFOS WELL PUMP, .5 HP,
115V, 3 WIRE, HLPS, WTP Pump Sample 2 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 18 Low
WTM 15-HLPS WTM-Pump-38 Mechanical Systems 2012 SP-3

SUMP PUMP, HI VOLTAGE VAULT (WEST OF HLPS CONT BLDG),
HLPS, WTP Pump Sump 19 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 12 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-39 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF PMP 53 CF-PMP-53, PUMP 3, METERING, ANIONIC FLOC AID POLY, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Pump-4 Mechanical Systems 1985 LLPS-P3 LLPS Pump 3 Pump Other (Pump) -8 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-40 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF PMP 54 CF-PMP-54, PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP, MOYNO, EMULSION
FEED, SOUTH POLYBLEND, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 4 24 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-41 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-CMP-1 COMPRESSOR - SOUTH POLYBLEND, Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-42 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-CMP-2 COMPRESSOR - NORTH POLYBLEND Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-43 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-MEQ-1 DISPERSER-SOUTH POLYBLEND, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 2 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-44 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-MEQ-2 DISPERSER - NORTH POLYBLEND, Pump Metering 2 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 2 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-45 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-12 CF-PMP-12, PUMP, METERING, ALUM FEED 2, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-46 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-13 CF-PMP-13, PUMP, METERING, ALUM FEED 3, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-47 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-21 CF-PMP-21, METERING PUMP 1, CAUSTIC FEED, FILTERED
WATER, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-48 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-22 Caustic Feed METERING PUMP 2, Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-49 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-23 METERING PUMP 3, UP FRONT CAUSTIC 3, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Pump-5 Mechanical Systems 1985 LLPS-P4 LLPS Pump 4 Pump Other (Pump) -8 Replace or Run to
Failure Reduced Efficiency 6 5 45 Med-High
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-50 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-24 METERING PUMP 4, UP FRONT CAUSTIC, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-51 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-31 PUMP 1, METERING, FLUORIDE FEED, FLUORIDE ROOM, CHEM
BLDG Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-52 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-32 PUMP 2, METERING, FLUORIDE FEED, FLUORIDE ROOM, CHEM
BLDG Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-53 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-41 Hypo 1 Metering Pump Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-54 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-42 CF-PMP-42, PUMP, METERING, HYPO 2, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-55 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-43 Hypo 3 Metering Pump , Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-56 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-51 CF-PMP-51, PUMP 1, METERING, ANIONIC FLOC AID POLY, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-57 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-52x Pump 2 ANIONIC FLOC AID Pump 2 Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-58 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-61 PUMP 1, METERING, CATIONIC FILTER AID POLY, CHEM BLDG Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-59 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-62 PUMP 2, METERING, CATIONIC FILTER AID POLY 2, Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Pump-6 Mechanical Systems 2010 DS-PMP-1 Screen Wash P1, Drum Screen Wash Pump Pump Other (Pump) 17 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-60 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-71 ACH Feed PUMP 1, ACH FEED 1, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-61 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-72 PUMP, METERING, ACH FEED 2, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-62 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-81 CF-PMP-81, PUMP 1, METERING, CLARIFIER POLY FEED, CHEM
BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-63 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-82 PUMP 2, METERING, CLARIFIER POLY FEED, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-64 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-83 CF-PMP-83, PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP, MOYNO, EMULSION
FEED, NORTH POLYBLEND, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-65 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-91 PUMP 1, METERING, NONIONIC FILTER POLY, CHEM BLDG, Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-66 Mechanical Systems 2010 CF-PMP-92 PUMP 2, METERING, NONIONIC FILTER POLY, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low

Page 15 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-67 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-PMP-1 CS-PMP-1, SUBMERSIBLE PUMP, ACID SPILL CONTAINMENT
SUMP, WTP Pump Sump 17
Increased
Maintenance
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 10 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-68 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-PMP-2 Base Side Chemical Sump Pump Pump Sump 17 Increased
Maintenance
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 10 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-69 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-PMP-3 CS-PMP-3, HYPO MIX/TRANS PUMP, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Chemical Feed 2 Increased
Maintenance
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 3 15 Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Pump-7 Mechanical Systems 2010 LLPS-P1 LLPS Pump 1 Pump Other (Pump) 17 Rehabilitation Reduced Capacity/Pressure 4 6 36 Med-High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-70 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-PMP-4 CS-PMP-4, CAUSTIC MIX/TRANS PUMP, SOUTH CHEM METERING
PUMP ROOM, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Metering 2
Increased
Maintenance
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Pump-71 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-PMP-5 CS-PMP-5, ALUM TRANSFER PUMP, CHEM BLDG, WTP Pump Chemical Feed 2 Increased
Maintenance
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 3 15 Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Pump-72 Mechanical Systems 2012 LOX-SP-1 LOX-SP-1, SUBMESIBLE PUMP, LIQUID OXYGEN STORAGE TANK
AREA, WTP Pump Chemical Feed 4 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 12 Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Pump-73 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-PMP-8 SUMP PUMP, #2 (SOUTH), RPS, WTP Pump Sump 17 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Pump-74 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-PMP-9 FLOOR PUMP (SUMP OVERFLOW), RPS, WTP Pump Sump 17 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Pump-75 Mechanical Systems 2010 SL-PMP-1 UNDERDRAIN PUMP, SUBMERSIBLE, SLUDGE LAGOON 2, WTP Pump Submersible 17 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Pump-76 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-PMP-1 DECANT PUMP 1, RPS, WTP Pump Other (Pump) 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Pump-77 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-PMP-2 DECANT PUMP 2, RPS, WTP Pump Other (Pump) 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Pump-78 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-PMP-3 SLUDGE PUMP 1, RPS, WTP Pump Other (Pump) 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Pump-79 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-PMP-4 SLUDGE PUMP 2, RPS, WTP Pump Other (Pump) 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Pump-8 Mechanical Systems 2010 LLPS-P2 LLPS Pump 2 Pump Other (Pump) 17 Rehabilitation Reduced Capacity/Pressure 4 6 36 Med-High WTM 20-Operations Bldg WTM-Pump-80 Mechanical Systems 2012 WTP-SP-11 PUMP 1, SUMP, OPS BASEMENT DRAIN, WTP Pump Sump 19 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 12 Low
WTM 20-Operations Bldg WTM-Pump-81 Mechanical Systems 2012 WTP-SP-12 PUMP 2, SUMP, OPS BASEMENT DRAIN, WTP Pump Sump 19 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 2 12 Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Pump-9 Mechanical Systems 2010 PUMP-20PB-E-1 SUMP PUMP, SUBMERSIBLE, VAULT 20PB-E-1, LLPS, WTP Pump Sump 17 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 18 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-1 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-MIX-1 MIXER- SOUTH POLY BLENDING MIX TANK 1, CHEM BLDG, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-10 Building and Grounds 2010
CO2-BULK
STORAGE TANK Bulk Storage Tank Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-11 Building and Grounds 2010 CO2-VAPORIZER Vaporizer Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-12 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-1 CS-TNK-1, HYPO BULK STORAGE TANK 1, SOUTH TANK FARM,
WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-13 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-10 CAT POLY BULK STORAGE TANK, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 3 6 24 Med-High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-14 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-2 CS-TNK-2, HYPO BULK STORAGE TANK 2, SOUTH TANK FARM,
WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-15 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-3 CAUSTIC BULK STORAGE TANK 1, SOUTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-16 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-4 CAUSTIC BULK STORAGE TANK 2, SOUTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-17 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-5 ACH BULK STORAGE TANK, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 3 6 24 Med-High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-18 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-6 ALUM BULK STORAGE TANK 2, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-19 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-7 ALUM BULK STORAGE TANK 3, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-2 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-MIX-4 CF-MIX-4, MIXER, NON-I POLY, TANK 2, POLYBLEND ROOM,
CHEM BLDG, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 4 3 18 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-20 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-8 FLUORIDE BULK STORAGE TANK 1, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-21 Building and Grounds 2010 CS-TNK-9 FLUORIDE BULK STORAGE TANK 2, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 5 20 Medium
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Tank-22 Building and Grounds 1990 1-MEQ-1 EAST VAPORIZOR 1, LIQUID OXYGEN, 9,000 SCFH, LOX AREA,
WTP Tanks Chemical -3 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 4 6 36 Med-High WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Tank-23 Building and Grounds 1990 1-MEQ-2 WEST VAPORIZOR 2, LIQUID OXYGEN, 9,000 SCFH, LOX AREA,
WTP Tanks Chemical -3 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 4 6 36 Med-High WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Tank-24 Building and Grounds 1990 1-T-1 LOX STORAGE TANK 1, LOX STORAGE AREA, WTP Tanks Chemical -3 Replace or Run to
Failure Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 5 9 63 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-3 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-MIX-5 CF-MIX-5, MIXER, NON-I POLY, TANK 1, POLYBLEND ROOM,
CHEM BLDG, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 4 3 18 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-4 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-TNK-1 CAT/ANI POLYBLEND MIX TANK 1, Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-5 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-TNK-2 CAT/ANI POLY FEED TANK, SOUTH POLYBLEND, Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-6 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-TNK-4 CF-TNK-4, NONIONIC FILTER POLY FEED TANK 1, POLYBLEND
ROOM, CHEM BLDG, WTP Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 4 3 18 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-7 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-TNK-5 CF-TNK-5, NONIONIC FILTER POLY FEED TANK 2, CHEM BLDG,
WTP Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 4 3 18 Med-Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-8 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-TNK-6 CAT/ANI POLY MIXING TANK, NORTH POLYBLEND, Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High

Page 16 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Tank-9 Building and Grounds 2010 CF-TNK-7 CAT/ANI POLY FEED TANK, NORTH POLYBLEND, Tanks Chemical 17 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-1 Mechanical Systems 1974 ARV-LL-5 ARV-LL-5, AIR RELIEF VALVE, 42 DISCHARGE HEADER, LLPS, WTP Valves Air Valve -19 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-10 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-CKV-3 LL-CKV-3, 24 CHECK VALVE, PUMP 3 EFFLUENT, LLPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-100 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MO-15 F1-MO-15, WASTE WASHWATER ACTUATOR, FILTER 1, FILTER
DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-101 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MO-16 F1-MO-16, FILTER TO WASTE ACTUATOR, FILTER 1, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-102 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MOV-11 F1-MOV-11, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 1, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-103 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MOV-12 F1-MOV-12, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 1, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-104 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MOV-13 F1-MOV-13, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER 1, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-105 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MOV-14 F1-MOV-14, AIR SCOUR VALVE, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-106 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MOV-15 F1-MOV-15, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER 1, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-107 Mechanical Systems 2010 F1-MOV-16 F1-MOV-16, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER 1, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-108 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MO-21 INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 2, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-109 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MO-22 F2-MO-22, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 2, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-11 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-CKV-4 LL-CKV-4, 24 CHECK VALVE, PUMP 4 EFFLUENT, LLPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-110 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MO-23 F2-MO-23, BACKWASH VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 2, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-111 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MO-24 F2-MO-24, AIR SCOUR VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 2, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-112 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MO-25 F2-MO-25, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 2,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-113 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MOV-21 FW-MOV-21, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 2, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-114 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MOV-22 F2-MOV22, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 2, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY,
FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-115 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MOV-23 FW-MOV-23, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER 2, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-116 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MOV-24 F2-MOV-24, AIR SCOUR VALVE, FILTER 2, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-117 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MOV-25 F2-MOV-25, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER 2, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-118 Mechanical Systems 2010 F2-MOV-26 FW-MOV-26, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER 2, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-119 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MO-31 F3-MO-31, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 3, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-12 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-HOV-2 LL-HOV-2, 12 GATE VALVE, CLARIFIER RECYCLE, LLPS, WTP Valves Gate 17 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-120 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MO-32 F3-MO-32, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 3, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-121 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MO-33 F3-MO-33, BACKWASH VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 3, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-122 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MO-34 F3-MO-34, AIR SCOUR VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 3, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-123 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MO-35 F3-MO-35, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER 3, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-124 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MO-36 F3-MO-36, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 3, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-125 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MOV-31 F3-MOV-31, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 3, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-126 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MOV-32 F3-MOV-32, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 3, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-127 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MOV-33 F3-MOV-33, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER 3, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-128 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MOV-34 F3-MOV-34, AIR SCOUR VALVE, FILTER 3, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-129 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MOV-35 F3-MOV-35, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER 3, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-13 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MO-1 LL-MO-1, ACTUATOR, PUMP 1 EFFLUENT VALVE, LLPS, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-130 Mechanical Systems 2010 F3-MOV-36 F3-MOV-36, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER 3, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-131 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MO-41 F4-MO-41, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 4, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-132 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MO-42 F4-MO-42, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 4, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-133 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MO-43 F4-MO-43, BACKWASH VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 4, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High

Page 17 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-134 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MO-44 F4-MO-44, AIR SCOUR VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 4, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-135 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MO-45 F4-MO-45, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 4,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-136 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MO-46 F4-MO-46, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 4, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-137 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MOV-41 F4-MOV-41, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 4, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-138 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MOV-42 F4-MOV-42, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 4, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-139 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MOV-43 F4-MOV-43, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER 4, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-14 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MO-2 LL-MO-2, ACTUATOR, PUMP 2 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE,
LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-140 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MOV-44 F4-MOV-44, AIR SCOUR VALVE, FILTER 4, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-141 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MOV-45 F4-MOV-45. WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER 4, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-142 Mechanical Systems 2010 F4-MOV-46 F4-MOV-46, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER 4, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-143 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MO-51 F5-MO-51, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 5, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-144 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MO-52 F5-MO-52, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 5, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-145 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MO-53 F5-MO-53, BACKWASH VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 5, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-146 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MO-54 F5-MO-54, AIR SCOUR VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 5, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-147 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MO-55 F5-MO-55, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 5,
FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-148 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MO-56 F5-MO-56, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE ACTUATOR, FILTER 5, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-149 Mechanical Systems 2010 f5-MOV-51 F5-MOV-51, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 5, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-15 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MO-3 LL-MO-3, ACTUATOR, PUMP 3 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE,
LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-150 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MOV-52 F5-MOV-52, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER 5, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-151 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MOV-53 F5-MOV-53, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER 5, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-152 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MOV-54 F5-MOV-54, AIR SCOUR VALVE, FILTER 5, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-153 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MOV-55 F5-MOV-55, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER 5, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-154 Mechanical Systems 2010 F5-MOV-56 F5-MOV-56, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER 5, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-155 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MO-61 F6-MO-61, FILTER 6 ACTUATOR, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-156 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MO-62 F6-MO-62, FILTER 6 ACTUATOR, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-157 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MO-63 F6-MO-63, FILTER 6 ACTUATOR, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-158 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MO-64 F6-MO-64, HC-664, FILTER 6 ACTUATOR, AIR SCOUR VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-159 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MO-65 FILTER 6 ACTUATOR, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE, FILTER DECK,
WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-16 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MO-4 LL-MO-4, ACTUATOR, PUMP 4 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE,
LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-160 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MO-66 F6-MO-66, FILTER 6 ACTUATOR, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-161 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MOV-61 F6-MOV-61, VALVE, FILTER 6 INFLUENT, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-162 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MOV-62 F6-MOV-62, VALVE, FILTER 6 EFFLUENT, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-163 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MOV-63 VALVE, FILTER 6 BACKWASH, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-164 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MOV-64 F6-M0V-64, VALVE, FILTER 6 AIR SCOUR, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-165 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MOV-65 F6-MOV-65, VALVE, FILTER 6 WASTE WASHWATER, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-166 Mechanical Systems 2010 F6-MOV-66 F6-MOV-66, VALVE, FILTER 6 FILTER TO WASTE, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-167 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MO-71 F7-MO-71, FILTER 7 ACTUATOR, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-168 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MO-72 F7-MO-72, FILTER 7 ACTUATOR, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-169 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MO-73 BW valve Actuator Valves Other (Valves) 12 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-17 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MOV-1 LL-MOV-1, PUMP 1, 24 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE, LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Increased
Maintenance Reduced Capacity/Pressure 2 6 30 Med-High

Page 18 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-170 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MO-74 F7-MO-74, HC-674, FILTER 7 ACTUATOR, AIR SCOUR VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-171 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MO-75 F7-MO-75, FILTER 7 ACTUATOR, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-172 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MO-76 F7-MO-76, FILTER 7 ACTUATOR, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-173 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MOV-71 F7-MOV-71, VALVE, FILTER 7 INFLUENT, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-174 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MOV-72 F7-MOV-72, VALVE, FILTER 7 EFFLUENT, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-175 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MOV-73 F7-MOV-73, VALVE, FILTER 7 BACKWASH, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-176 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MOV-74 F7-MOV-74, VALVE, FILTER 7 AIR SCOUR, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-177 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MOV-75 F7-MOV-75, VALVE, FILTER 7 WASTE WASHWATER, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-178 Mechanical Systems 2010 F7-MOV-76 F7-MOV-76, VALVE, FILTER 7 FILTER TO WASTE, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-179 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MO-81 F8-MO-81, FILTER 8 ACTUATOR, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-18 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MOV-2 LL-MOV-2, PUMP 2, 24 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE, LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Increased
Maintenance Reduced Capacity/Pressure 2 6 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-180 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MO-82 F8-MO-82, FILTER 8 ACTUATOR, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-181 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MO-83 F8-MO-83, FILTER 8 ACTUATOR, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-182 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MO-84 F8-MO-84, HC-684, FILTER 8 ACTUATOR, AIR SCOUR VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-183 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MO-85 F8-MO-85, FILTER 8 ACTUATOR, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-184 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MO-86 F8-MO-86, FILTER 8 ACTUATOR, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-185 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MOV-81 F8-MOV-81, VALVE, FILTER 8 INFLUENT, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-186 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MOV-82 F8-MOV-82, VALVE, FILTER 8 EFFLUENT, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-187 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MOV-83 F8-MOV-83, VALVE, FILTER 8 BACKWASH, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-188 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MOV-84 F8-MOV-84, VALVE, FILTER 8 AIR SCOUR, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-189 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MOV-85 F8-MOV-85, VALVE, FILTER 8 WASTE WASHWATER, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-19 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MOV-3 LL-MOV-3, PUMP 3, 24 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE, LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Increased
Maintenance Reduced Capacity/Pressure 2 6 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-190 Mechanical Systems 2010 F8-MOV-86 F8-MOV-86, VALVE, FILTER 8 FILTER TO WASTE, 12 INCH, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-191 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MO-91 F9-MO-91, FILTER 9 ACTUATOR, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-192 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MO-92 Filter 9 EFF Valve Actuator Valves Other (Valves) 12 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-193 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MO-93 F9-MO-93, FILTER 9 ACTUATOR, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-194 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MO-94 F9-MO-94, HC-694, FILTER 9 ACTUATOR, AIR SCOUR VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-195 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MO-95 F9-MO-95, FILTER 9 ACTUATOR, WASTE WASHWATER VALVE,
FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-196 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MO-96 F9-MO-96, FILTER 9 ACTUATOR, FILTER TO WASTE VALVE, FILTER GALLERY,WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-197 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MOV-91 F9-MOV-91, VALVE, FILTER 9 INFLUENT, 16 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-198 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MOV-92 F9-MOV-92, VALVE, FILTER 9 EFFLUENT, 18 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-199 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MOV-93 F9-M0V-93, VALVE, FILTER 9 BACKWASH, 24 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-2 Mechanical Systems 1974 LL-HOV-1 LL-HOV-1, 16 GATE VALVE, HEADER EFFLUENT RECYCLE, LLPS, WTP Valves Gate -19 Rehabilitation Reduced Capacity/Pressure 2 6 36 Med-High WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-20 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-MOV-4 LL-MOV-4, PUMP 4, 18 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VAVLE, LLPS, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Increased
Maintenance Reduced Capacity/Pressure 2 6 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-200 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MOV-94 F9-MOV-94, VALVE, FILTER 9 AIR SCOUR, 8 INCH BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-201 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MOV-95 F9-MOV-95, VALVE, FILTER 9 WASTE WASHWATER, 24 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER DECK, WTP[ Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-202 Mechanical Systems 2010 F9-MOV-96 F9-MOV-96, VALVE, FILTER 9 FILTER TO WASTE, 12 INCH
BUTTERFLY, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 5 30 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-203 Mechanical Systems 2010 F-CKV-10 F-CKV-10, 10 CHECK VALVE, FILTER TO WASTE PUMP 1
DISCHARGE, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Check Valve 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-204 Mechanical Systems 2010 F-CKV-20 F-CKV-20, 10 CHECK VALVE, FILTER TO WASTE PUMP 2
DISCHARGE, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Check Valve 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-205 Mechanical Systems 2010 FDV-1 FDV-1, DRAIN VALVE, CONDITIONED/APPLIED WATER CHANNEL,

MANUAL, FILTER GALLERY, ABOVE NORTH FILTERS CFE PIPE,
WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 32 Med-Low

Page 19 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

MOV, CATIONIC POLYMER TANK, FEED TO METERING PUMPS,
NORTH CHEM TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-227 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-11 CS-MOV-11, MOV, MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, HYPO TANK 1, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-228 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-13 MOV, MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, CAUSTIC TANK 1, SOUTH TANK
FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-229 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-14 MOV, MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, CAUSTIC TANK 2, SOUTH TANK
FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-23 Mechanical Systems 2010 2184 AF-HOV-244, VALVE, EFF SAND PUMP 3, WEST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-230 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-15 MOV, MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, ACH TANK 1, NORTH TANK FARM,
WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-231 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-16 MOV, MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, ALUM TANK 2, NORTH TANK
FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-232 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-17 ISOLATION VALVE, MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, ALUM TANK 3, NORTH
TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-233 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-2 CS-MOV-2, HYPO TANK 2, MOV, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE,
SOUTH TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-234 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-3 MOV, CAUSTIC TANK 1, MOV, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE,
SOUTH TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-235 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-4 MOV, CAUSTIC TANK 2, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE, SOUTH
TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-236 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-5 MOV, ACH TANK 1, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE, NORTH TANK
FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-237 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-6 ALUM TANK 2, MOV, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE, NORTH
TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-238 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-7 ALUM TANK 3, MOV, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE, NORTH
TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-239 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-8 MOV, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE, NORTH TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-24 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-12 VALVE, EAST ACTIFLO COAG DRAIN, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-240 Mechanical Systems 2010 CS-MOV-9 MOV, FLUORIDE TANK 2, METERING PUMP FEED VALVE, NORTH
TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-241 Mechanical Systems 2010 FCV-903 FCV-903, FILL CONTROL VALVE, DRY ANIONIC FLOC AID POLY, CHEM BLDG, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low

Page 20 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-242 Mechanical Systems 2010 FCV-903x FCV-903x, FLOW CONTROL VALVE, MIX TANK UTILITY WATER,
SOUTH POLYBLEND, CHEM BLDG, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-243 Mechanical Systems 2010 FCV-944 FCV-944, FLOW CONTROL VALVE, MIX TANK UTILITY WATER,
NORTH POLYBLEND, CHEM BLDG, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-244 Mechanical Systems 2010 FCV-CO2 FCV-CO2, CO2 FLOW CONTROL VALVE WITH POSITION
INDICATOR AND TRANSMITTER, CO2 CONTROL CABINET, CO2
STORAGE AREA, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 16-Chemicals WTM-Valves-245 Mechanical Systems 2010 SHC-MOV-12 SHC-MOV-12, MOV to MIX/TRANSFER PUMP, HYPO TANK 2,
SOUTH CHEM TANK FARM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-246 Mechanical Systems 1990 OG-MOV-11 OG-MOV-11, VALVE, 3 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 1
OXYGEN SUPPLY, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-247 Mechanical Systems 1990 OG-MOV-12 OZONE GAS EFFLUENT,VALVE ACTUATOR OZONE GENERATOR 1,
OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) -8
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-249 Mechanical Systems 1990 OG-MOV-21 OG-MOV-21, VALVE, 3 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 2
OXYGEN SUPPLY, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-25 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-13 VALVE, EAST ACTIFLO MATURATION DRAIN, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-250 Mechanical Systems 1990 OG-MOV-22 OG-MOV-22, VALVE, 2.5 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 2 GAS
EFFLUENT, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-251 Mechanical Systems 1990 OG-MOV-23 OG-MOV-23, VALVE, 2 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 2
COOLING SUPPLY, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 28 Med-Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-252 Mechanical Systems 2010 OG-MOV-1 OG-MOV-1, OZONE EFFLUENT METERING VALVE, OZONE GAS TO
OZONE CONTACTORS, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Reduced Efficiency 1 5 20 Medium WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-253 Mechanical Systems 2010 OG-MOV-31 OG-MOV-31, VALVE, 3 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 3
OXYGEN SUPPLY, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-254 Mechanical Systems 2010 OG-MOV-32 OG-MOV-32, VALVE, 2.5 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 3 GAS
EFFLUENT, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low
WTM 17-Ozone Generation WTM-Valves-255 Mechanical Systems 2010 OG-MOV-33 OG-MOV-33, VALVE, 2 BUTTERFLY, OZONE GENERATOR 3
COOLING WATER SUPPLY, OZONE GENERATOR ROOM, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 Rehabilitation Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-256 Mechanical Systems 2010 EB-HOV-19 CLARIFIER DRAIN TO EQ BASIN 1 VALVE , Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-257 Mechanical Systems 2010 EB-HOV-20 CLARIFIER DRAIN TO EQ BASIN 2 MANUAL VALVE, Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-258 Mechanical Systems 2010 EB-MOV-1 EQ BASIN 1 INFLUENT MOV, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-259 Mechanical Systems 2010 EB-MOV-2 EQ BASIN 2 INF MOV, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-26 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-14 VALVE, INF SAND PUMP 1, EAST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-260 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-10 ACTIFLO BASIN DRAIN MANUAL VALVE, Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-261 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-13 FLOW METER OUT VALVE CLARIFIER DECANT, RPS, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-262 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-9 ACTIFLO BASIN DRAIN MANUAL VALVE, Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-263 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-MOV-3 EQ BASIN 1 DECANT VALVE, 8 BUTTERFLY Valves Butterfly 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-264 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-MOV-4 EQ BASIN 2 DECANT VALVE, 8 BUTTERFLY Valves Butterfly 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-265 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-MOV-5 EQ BASIN 1 SLUDGE EFFLUENT VALVE, 10 ECCENTRIC PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 18-EQ Basin + WW PS WTM-Valves-266 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-MOV-6 EQ BASIN 2 SLUDGE EFFLUENT VALVE, 10 ECCENTRIC PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-267 Mechanical Systems 2010 SL-MOV-1 INFLUENT VALVE LAGOON 1, 12 PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-268 Mechanical Systems 2010 SL-MOV-2 INFLUENT VALVE LAGOON 2, 12 PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-269 Mechanical Systems 2010 SL-MOV-3 INFLUENT VALVE LAGOON 3, 12 PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 4 20 Med-Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-27 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-142 VALVE, EFF SAND PUMP 1 EAST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-270 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-CKV-1 DECANT PUMP 1 DISCHARGE CHECK VALVE, RPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-271 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-CKV-2 DECANT PUMP 2 DISCHARGE CHECK VALVE, RPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-272 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-CKV-3 SLUDGE PUMP 1 DISCHARGE CHECK VALVE, RPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-273 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-CKV-4 SLUDGE PUMP 2 DISCHARGE CHECK VALVE, RPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-274 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-1 DECANT PUMP 1 SUCTION MANUAL VALVE, 8 BUTTERFLY, RPS,
WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-275 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-11 CLARIFIER DECANT VALVE, 12 BUTTERFLY, RPS, WTP WR-HOV11, VALVE, PROCESS RECYCLE/FLOW METER IN, Valves Butterfly 12 No Action RequiredLack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-276 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-12 CLARIFIER DECANT FLOW METER BYPASS VALVE, RPS, 12
BUTTERFLY Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-277 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-2 DECANT PUMP 2 SUCTION VALVE, Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-278 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-3 SLUDGE PUMP 1 SUCTION VALVE, 10 ECCENTRIC PLUG Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low

Page 21 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-279 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-4 SLUDGE PUMP 2 SUCTION,VALVE, 10 ECCENTRIC PLUG Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-28 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-143 VALVE, EFF SAND PUMP 2 EAST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-280 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-5 DECANT PUMP 1 DISCHARGE VALVE, 8 BUTTERFLY Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-281 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-6 DECANT PUMP 2 DISCHARGE, VALVE 8 BUTTERFLY Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-282 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-7 SLUDGE PUMP 1 DISCHARGE VALVE, 8 ECCENTRIC PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-283 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-HOV-8 SLUDGE PUMP 2 DISCHARGE,8 ECCENTRIC PLUG, Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 19-Sludge Clarifiers and Lagoons WTM-Valves-284 Mechanical Systems 2010 WR-MOV-7 SLUDGE TO LAGOON VALVE, 8 ECCENTRIC PLUG Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-285 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-CKV-1 FS-CKV-1, DOUBLE DOOR CHECK VALVE, FILTER AIR SCOUR
BLOWER 1 DISCH, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-286 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-CKV-2 FS-CKV-2, DOUBLE DOOR CHECK VALVE, FILTER AIR SCOUR
BLOWER 2 DISCH, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-287 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-HOV-1 FS-HOV-1, BUTTERFLY VALVE, FILTER AIR SCOUR BLOWER #1
DISCH ISO, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-288 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-HOV-2 FS-HOV-2, BUTTERFLY VALVE, FILTER AIR SCOUR BLOWER #2
DISCH ISO, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-289 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-MOV-2 FS-MOV-2, VALVE, MOTOR OPERATED, FILTER AIR SCOUR
BLOWER EXHAUST, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-29 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-144 VALVE, EFF SAND PUMP 3, EAST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-290 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-RLF-1 FS-RLF-1, RELIEF VALVE, BLOWER 1, FILTER AIR SCOUR
DISCHARGE LINE, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Air Valve 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 21-Blowers / Z3PS WTM-Valves-291 Mechanical Systems 2010 FS-RLF-2 FS-RLF-2, RELIEF VALVE, BLOWER 2, FILTER AIR SCOUR
DISCHARGE LINE, BLOWER BLDG, WTP Valves Air Valve 17 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 00-Misc Systems WTM-Valves-292 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-HOV-1 FM-HOV-1, 36 BFV, INFLUENT FLOW METER ISO VALVE, FMV,
WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 5 30 Medium
WTM 00-Misc Systems WTM-Valves-293 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-HOV-2 FM-HOV-2, 42 BFV, INFLUENT FLOW METER ISO VALVE, FMV,
WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Rehabilitation
Process/Facility Operates Normally
Without 2 5 30 Medium
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-3 Mechanical Systems 1974 LL-HOV-10 LL-HOV-10, 42 BUTTERFLY VALVE, DISCHARGE HEADER, LLPS,
WTP Valves Butterfly -24 Rehabilitation Reduced Capacity/Pressure 2 6 42 Med-High WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-30 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-16 VALVE, INF SAND PUMP 2, EAST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-31 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-18 VALVE, INF SAND PUMP 3, EAST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-32 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-CKV-11 FM-CKV-11, FLASH MIX PUMP 1 DISCHARGE CHECK VALVE, OPS
BASEMENT, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-33 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-CKV-21 FM-CKV-21, FLASH MIX PUMP 2 DISCHARGE CHECK VALVE, OPS
BASEMENT, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-34 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-HOV-11 FM-HOV-11, FLASH MIX PUMP 1 SUCTION VALVE, OPS
BASEMENT, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-35 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-HOV-12 FM-HOV-12, FLASH MIX PUMP 1 DISCHARGE VALVE, OPS
BASEMENT, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-36 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-HOV-12A FM-HOV-12A, FLASH MIX PUMP 2 SUCTION VALVE, OPS
BASEMENT, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-37 Mechanical Systems 2010 FM-HOV-22 FM-HOV-22, FLASH MIX PUMP 2 DISCHARGE VALVE, OPS
BASEMENT, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-38 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-22 AF-HOV-22, VALVE, PLUG, 8 INCH, WEST ACTIFLO COAG DRAIN, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-39 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-23 AF-HOV-23, VALVE, PLUG, 8 INCH, WEST ACTIFLO MAT DRAIN, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-4 Mechanical Systems 1985 ARV-LL-3 ARV-LL-3, AIR RELIEF VALVE, LL PUMP 3 DISCHARGE, LLPS, WTP Valves Air Valve -8 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-40 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-24 VALVE, PLUG, 6 INCH, INF SAND PUMP 1, WEST ACTIFLO Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-41 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-HOV-26 VALVE, PLUG, 6 INCH, INF SAND PUMP 2, WEST ACTIFLO, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-42 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-MOV-11 VALVE, ACTIFLO EAST TRAIN INF 803, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 3 9 36 High WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-43 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-MOV-12 VALVE, 42 INCH BUTTERFLY, EAST ACTIFLO EFF. WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 3 9 36 High WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-44 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-MOV-21 VALVE, 42 INCH BUTTERFLY, WEST ACTIFLO INF, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 3 9 36 High WTM 12-Pretreatment WTM-Valves-45 Mechanical Systems 2010 AF-MOV-22 VALVE, 42 INCH BUTTERFLY, WEST ACTIFLO EFF, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 3 9 36 High WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-46 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MO-31 OX-MO-31, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 3,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) -8
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-47 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MO-32 EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 3, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) -8
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-48 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MO-41 OC-MO-41, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 4,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) -8
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-49 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MO-42 OC-MO-42, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 4,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) -8
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-5 Mechanical Systems 1985 ARV-LL-4 ARV-LL-4, AIR RELIEF VALVE, LL PUMP 4 DISCHARGE, LLPS, WTP Valves Air Valve -8 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low

Page 22 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

WATERMAN WTP ASSET RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS
FacilityCode Process Area Asset Name Discipline Install Year City Asset ID Asset Description Class Subclass Remaining Useful
Life (Years) Action Plan Consequence on Operating Ability LOF COF Risk Score Risk Level WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-50 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MOV-31 OX-MOV-31, INFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 3, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-51 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MOV-32 OC-MOV-32, EFFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 3, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-52 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MOV-41 OC-MOV-41, INFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 4, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-53 Mechanical Systems 1990 OC-MOV-42 OC-MOV-42, EFFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 4, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly -8 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-54 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-1 OC-HOV-1, VALVE, NE EFFLUENT CHANNEL DRAIN, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 4 3 15 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-55 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-10 OC-HOV-10, VALVE, NW EFFLUENT CHANNEL DRAIN, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-56 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-11 OC-HOV-11, VALVE, OC DRAIN SUMP DISCHARGE ISOLATION,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-57 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-2 OC-HOV-2, VALVE, OZONE CONTACT BASIN 4 DRAIN, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-58 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-3 OC-HOV-3, VALVE, SE EFFLUENT CHANNEL DRAIN, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-59 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-4 OC-HOV-4, VALVE, BASIN 3 DRAIN, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-6 Mechanical Systems 2010 ARV-LL-1 ARV-LL-1, AIR RELIEF VALVE, LL PUMP 1 DISCHARGE, LLPS, WTP Valves Air Valve 17 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-60 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-5 OC-HOV-5, VALVE, SE INFLUENT CHANNEL DRAIN, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-61 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-6 OC-HOV-6, VALVE, OZONE CONTACTOR
SAMPLE/INSTRUMENTATION GALLERY DRAIN, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-62 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-7 OC-HOV-7, VALVE, SW INFLUENT CHANNEL DRAIN, OZONE
CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-63 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-8 OC-HOV-8, VALVE, BASIN 2 DRAIN, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-64 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-HOV-9 OC-HOV-9, VALVE, BASIN 1 DRAIN, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 Increased
Maintenance
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 2 3 15 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-65 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MO-11 OC-MO-11, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 1,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 3 12 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-66 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MO-12 OC-MO-12, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 1,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 3 12 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-67 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MO-21 OX-MO-21, INFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 2,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 3 12 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-68 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MO-22 OC-MO-22, EFFLUENT VALVE ACTUATOR, OZONE BASIN 2,
OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 3 12 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-69 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MOV-11 OC-MOV-11, INFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 1, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-7 Mechanical Systems 2010 ARV-LL-2 ARV-LL-2, AIR RELIEF VALVE, LL PUMP 2 DISCHARGE, LLPS, WTP Valves Air Valve 17 Rehabilitation Reduced Efficiency 2 4 24 Med-Low WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-70 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MOV-12 OC-MOV-12, EFFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 1, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-71 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MOV-21 OC-MOV-21, INFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 2, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-72 Mechanical Systems 2010 OC-MOV-22 OC-MOV-22, EFFLUENT VALVE, 30 INCH BUTTERFLY, OZONE
BASIN 2, OZONE CONTACTOR, WTP Valves Butterfly 12 No Action Required Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 3 4 16 Med-Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-73 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-895 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 4B INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOMWTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-74 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-896 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 3B INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-75 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-897 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 4A INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-76 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-898 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 3A INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-77 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-899 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 1A INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-78 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-900 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 1B INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-79 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-901 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 2B INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 11-Intake / LLPS WTM-Valves-8 Mechanical Systems 2010 LL-CKV-1 LL-CKV-1, CHECK VALVE, PUMP 1 EFFLUENT, LLPS, WTP Valves Check Valve 12 Increased
Maintenance Reduced Efficiency 2 5 25 Medium
WTM 13-Ozone Contact + ICA WTM-Valves-80 Mechanical Systems 2010 VALVE-902 VALVE, OZONE ROTOMETER, BASIN 2A INLET, OZONE DESTRUCT
ROOM, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12 No Action Required
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 1 3 12 Low
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-81 Mechanical Systems 1974 FS-MOV-1 FS-MOV-1, MOTOR OPERATED VALVE, MASTER BACKWASH,
FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) -24 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-82 Mechanical Systems 1974 V-74 V-74, 36 BUTTERFLY VALVE, FILTERED WATER ISO, EVEN FILTERS, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly -24 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-83 Mechanical Systems 1974 V-75 V-75, 36 BUTTERFLY VALVE, FILTERED WATER ISO, ODD FILTERS, FILTER GALLERY, WTP Valves Butterfly -24 Rehabilitation Process/Facility Cannot Operate Without 4 9 54 High WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-84 Mechanical Systems 2010 F10-MO-101 F10-MO-101, FILTER 10 ACTUATOR, INFLUENT VALVE, FILTER
DECK, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-85 Mechanical Systems 2010 F10-MO-102 F10-MO-102, FILTER 10 ACTUATOR, EFFLUENT VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 5 4 28 Med-High
WTM 14-Filters WTM-Valves-86 Mechanical Systems 2010 F10-MO-103 F10-MO-103, FILTER 10 ACTUATOR, BACKWASH VALVE, FILTER
GALLERY, WTP Valves Other (Valves) 12
Replace or Run to
Failure
Lack of Redundancy/Potential Reduced
Efficiency 6 4 32 Med-High

Page 23 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23

Page 24 of 24 ends

Clity of Fairfield
Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: 08-28-23
Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and Risk Assessment
Appendix E
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 2, 2024 Project No.: 268-60-22-20
SENT VIA: EMAIL
TO: Mike Hether
CC: Stuart Hamilton
FROM: Julia McBride, PE, RCE #90692
REVIEWED BY: Jeff Wanlass, PE, RCE #60930
Amy Kwong, PE, RCE #73213
SUBJECT: Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and Risk Assessment

INTRODUCTION
The City of Fairfield (City) has retained West Yost to develop its 2023 Public Utility Master Plan (PUMP).

Task 5 for the PUMP describes a Water Storage Reservoirs Assessment (Assessment) to evaluate the condition of eight of the City’s reservoirs and to make recommendations for improvements. The following is a summary of the Task 5 Assessment scope of work:
• Prepare comprehensive, multi-discipline condition assessments of up to eight reservoirs. • Utilize the City’s existing risk framework to develop risk factors for each reservoir asset. • Develop recommendations for reservoir improvements to address deficiencies identified based on the condition assessment and/or results from the risk assessment.

The following eight reservoirs were selected for the Assessment: Cement Hill; Eastridge; Goldridge; Mangels; Martin Hill; Nelson Hill; Rancho Solano 3; and Rolling Hills. This technical memorandum (TM) summarizes the methods, findings, and recommendations that comprise the Assessment effort, and is organized into the following sections:
• Condition Assessment
• Risk Assessment
• Recommended Improvements

CONDITION ASSESSMENT
This section discusses the methodology used to assess the condition of the City’s reservoirs and summarizes the site investigation assessment results.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 2 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Methodology
Site investigations of eight reservoirs were conducted by the West Yost team on March 15 and March 16, 2023. The site investigations consisted of visual assessments of general site, mechanical, structural, and electrical assets at each reservoir. The evaluation included visual observations of all reservoir exteriors, and visual observations of four reservoir interiors: Eastridge, Mangels, Rancho Solano 3, and Nelson Hill. The site investigations were conducted by a team that included two City staff members from the Water Services Division, two West Yost project engineers, and three JDH Corrosion (JDH) specialists. The team also took photos and noted visible information (e.g., model number, serial number, size, etc.).

JDH provided corrosion condition assessments for each reservoir and ultrasonic thickness and coating thickness information for each metal reservoir. Ultrasonic thickness testing was used to determine the thickness of each steel reservoir shell and any wall thinning. Coating thickness testing was completed using the dry film thickness testing method. JDH also surveyed the cathodic protection (CP) system on three of five reservoirs that have such systems: Goldridge; Mangels; and Rolling Hills. At Martin Hill, JDH and City staff were unable to locate the rectifier or anode junction box to test the CP system. At Rancho Solano 3, JDH was unable to test the CP system as the reservoir was drained and water must be in the tank to test the CP system. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) was used to locate rebar and confirm rebar spacing and depth in the concrete reservoirs. Detailed findings from JDH’s work are presented in Appendix A.

TJC and Associates (TJC) provided a preliminary structural assessment for each reservoir. They did not perform a visual inspection, but rather used pictures, record drawings, and information provided by JDH.

TJC conducted a structural assessment of the reservoirs to identify areas of seismic vulnerability and other structural deficiencies. TJC generated hydrodynamic sloshing loads for each reservoir, and calculated stability with respect to sloshing/freeboard, sliding, uplift, buckling and hoop stress. Detailed findings from TJC’s structural assessment are presented in Appendix B.

ATEEM met separately with City staff on March 30, 2023 to provide the electrical and instrumentation evaluations of each reservoir. This evaluation included observation of the incoming service, MCCs, PLCs, Control Panels, and other relevant equipment. Detailed findings from ATEEM’s electrical assessment are presented in Appendix C.

Based on the field observations, West Yost assigned a score to each component using the scoring index defined in Table 1. This information was used in the Risk Assessment presented later in this TM.

Table 1. Visual Condition and Performance Scoring Index Score Condition Score Index Performance Score Index
1 Excellent Component functioning as intended
2 Slight visible degradation In service, but elevated O&M costs 3 Visible degradation In service, but function is moderately impaired 4 Integrity of component moderately compromised In service, but function is highly impaired 5 Integrity of component severely compromised Component is not functioning as intended TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 3 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Findings
Table 2 summarizes the reservoir type/material, shape, dimensions, capacity in million gallons (MG), and construction and/or rehabilitation year for each of the inspected reservoirs.

Table 2. Key Parameters for Inspected Reservoirs
Name
Type,
Material Shape Dimensions
Capacity,
MG
Year
Constructed
Year
Rehabilitated
Cement Hill Concrete
(Buried) Rectangular
316 feet x 199 feet
Water Height =
24 feet

10.0 1989 NA
Eastridge Concrete
(Buried) Rectangular
316 feet x 316 feet
Water Height =
24 feet

16.0 2003 NA
Goldridge Steel Circular
Diameter = 122 feet
Water Height =

26.5 feet

2.2 2004 NA
Mangels Steel Circular
Diameter = 103 feet
Water Height =
16 feet

1.0 1990 2010
Martin Hill Steel Circular
Diameter = 135 feet
Water Height =
25 feet

2.7 1980 2010
Nelson Hill Concrete Rectangular
357 feet x 316 feet
Water Height =
24 feet

12.0 1984 NA
Rancho
Solano 3 Steel Circular
Diameter = 143 feet
Water Height =
25 feet

3.1 1988 2009
Rolling Hills Steel Circular
Diameter = 143 feet
Water Height =
25 feet

3.1 1989 2010
Table 3 summarizes the observation comments for the general, structural, corrosion, mechanical, access and safety, and electrical/control system assets for each reservoir visited during the site investigations. A distinction is made in Table 3 between significant concerns warranting attention (bold text) versus lesser concerns and/or observations. Table 3 also summarizes the general condition of each reservoir evaluated.

Each reservoir is summarized as a subsection after Table 3.

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4-Tbls

Page 1 of 5 ends

Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and
Risk Assessment TM
Table 3. Reservoir Observations and Concerns
Site Observations, Issues, and Concerns
(a)
Cement Hill – Concrete Reservoir, 10 MG
General • Overall, reservoir is in good condition; there is visible degradation, but function is not impaired
• Site security and reservoir vent in good condition
• Grass on top of the reservoir has the potential to introduce infiltration and inflow • Past issues with vandalism (since addressed)
• Concern over cattle proximity to hatches
Structural • No significant issues observed
Corrosion • Not applicable to concrete reservoirs
Mechanical • Sample tap, water level controls, inlet and outlet piping, chlorine system, and isolation valves with MOVs in good condition
• Calcification and rust spots on effluent pipe
Access and Safety • No significant issues observed
Control System • Several broken lights on site; the lighting system is of advanced age Eastridge – Concrete Reservoir, 16 MG
General • Overall, reservoir is in poor condition; there is visible degradation, and function is moderately impaired
• Overflow and site security in good condition
• Major rust and significant seepage between reservoir cells • Every floor and wall joint has cracks
• Significant ponding on the surface
• Threat of infiltration and inflow into the reservoir
• Wrapped woven fiberglass fabric around miscellaneous columns; fiberglass flakes on the floor • Footing only 2.5 inches higher than ground surface elevation versus a minimum standard of 6 inches
Structural • Cover over the various reinforcing bars ranges from ⅝ inches to 4 ⅞ inches for the primary reinforcing
Corrosion • Not applicable to concrete reservoirs
Mechanical • Sample tap, water level controls, chlorine system, and isolation valves with MOVs in good condition
• Significant rust and corrosion on inlet/outlet piping • Significant calcification between cell transfer penetrations • Butterfly valves seal tight but need recoating
Access and Safety • Fall protection and ladder in good condition • The minimum 7-inch distance between ladder rungs and reservoir shell is not met Control System • Site is subfed from local pump station • Allen-Bradley PLC Model 5/20 should be replaced; it is past its useful life and replacements parts are only available via third party vendors
• PLC communicates via outdated blue hose cable to the pump station PLC; any change to either PLC will require replacement of the blue hose with more modern technology Goldridge – Welded Steel Reservoir, 2.2 MG
General • Overall, the reservoir is in good condition with some slight visible degradation • Reservoir overflow and site security in good condition • Manways have rust
• Only one vent; minimum of two needed to achieve adequate ventilation • Some rust on reservoir shell, cracks between footing and chime • Reservoir has anchor bolts in chairs
• Hatches difficult to operate
N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4-Tbls

Page 2 of 5 ends

Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and
Risk Assessment TM
Table 3. Reservoir Observations and Concerns
Site Observations, Issues, and Concerns
(a)
Structural • Insufficient freeboard exists due to past code changes; only 4 feet of freeboard is available;

5.6 feet is required under current code
• Sliding failure is not anticipated
• Uplift failure is not anticipated
• Compression buckling failure is not anticipated
• It is expected that the bottom two rings of the reservoir would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event
Corrosion • Coating in satisfactory condition
• Minor staining and blemishes visible
Mechanical • Sample tap, isolation valves, inlet and outlet piping, water level controls, and chlorine system in good condition
• Inoperable altitude valve
Access and Safety • Fall protection, cages, ladder, and guardrails in good condition Control System • Generator plug-in
• Level transmitter is located within PLC control panel is connected to a pressure tap, such that there is effectively a water line into the panel; accordingly, the level transmitter should be relocated
• Electrical panels are subject to direct sunlight and should be shaded or otherwise protected from sun exposure
• Allen-Bradley PLC Model 5/20 should be replaced; it is past its useful life and replacements parts are only available via third party vendors
Mangels – Welded Steel Reservoir, 1 MG
General • Overall, reservoir is in excellent condition
• Reservoir hatches, vents, crows nest, manways, and site security in good condition • No physical air gap for overflow piping
• Two 24-inch manways
• Some grout deteriorating around reservoir chime
Structural • Insufficient freeboard exists due to past code changes; 3 feet of freeboard is available; 5.0 feet is required under current code
• Sliding failure is not anticipated
• Uplift failure is not anticipated
• Compression buckling failure is not anticipated
• Hoop stress failure is not anticipated
• Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir Corrosion • Coating in satisfactory condition
• Minor staining and blemishes visible
Mechanical • Sample tap, inlet and outlet piping, isolation valves with MOVs, water level controls, and chlorine system in good condition
• Vaults installed in 2009
• Reservoir recoated in 2009
• Operational altitude valve
Access and Safety • Fall protection, ladders, cages, and guardrails in good condition Control System • Temporary generator plug-in
• Old washdown pump starter panel is located in larger overall panel; pump is no longer in service • Allen-Bradley PLC Model 5/20 should be replaced; it is past its useful life and replacements parts are only available via third party vendors
N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4-Tbls

Page 3 of 5 ends

Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and
Risk Assessment TM
Table 3. Reservoir Observations and Concerns
Site Observations, Issues, and Concerns
(a)
Martin Hill – Welded Steel Reservoir, 2.7 MG
General • Overall, the reservoir is in good condition with some slight visible degradation • Reservoir overflow, hatches, crows nest, manways, and site security in good condition • Minor site drainage issues
• Two 24-inch manways
• Footing only 4 inches higher than ground surface elevation versus a minimum standard of 6 inches
• Rust on chime
• Grout hard and eroded; doesn’t cover edge of chime
Structural • Insufficient freeboard exists due to past code changes; 3.2 feet freeboard of is available;

5.7 feet is required under current code
• Sliding failure is not anticipated
• Uplift failure is not anticipated
• Compression buckling failure is not anticipated
• Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir • It is expected that the bottom two rings of the reservoir would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event
Corrosion • Coating in satisfactory condition
• Minor staining and blemishes visible
• Unable to locate and test cathodic protection system
Mechanical • Sample tap, isolation valves with MOVs, inlet and outlet piping, water level controls, and chlorine system in good condition
• Operational altitude valve, but currently bypassed
Access and Safety • Fall protection, cages, ladder, and guardrails in good condition • Minor rust on ladder rungs
Control System • Kohler backup generator on site
• Micrologix 1400 PLC is no longer sold, it should be maintained as long as possible but will eventually need to be replaced
Nelson Hill – Concrete Reservoir, 12 MG
General • Overall, reservoir is in excellent condition
• Significant updates done in 2022
• Reservoir overflow, hatches, crows nest, manways, and site security in good condition • Poor site grading and drainage
• Cracking on floor
Structural • Roof repairs done in 2019–2020
• Concrete cover over the primary reinforcing ranged from 1 ¼ to 2 ⅝ inches Corrosion • Not applicable to concrete reservoirs
Mechanical • Sample tap, inlet piping, insolation valves with MOVs, isolation valves, water level controls, flow meter, and chlorine system in good condition
• Tideflex mixing check valves not watertight
• Outlet has rust
Access and Safety • Guardrails in good condition
• No significant issues observed
Control System • Small backup generator on site
• The Industrial Gateway communications router is not operating consistently; staff is investigating
N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4-Tbls

Page 4 of 5 ends

Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and
Risk Assessment TM
Table 3. Reservoir Observations and Concerns
Site Observations, Issues, and Concerns
(a)
Rancho Solano 3 – Welded Steel Reservoir, 3.1 MG
General • Overall, the reservoir is in good condition
• Reservoir overflow, hatches, crows nest, manways, and site security in good condition • Some slight visible degradation due to corrosion
• Sediment has accumulated at the bottom of the reservoir and is hard to remove • Grout on chime chipped, joint caulking peeling
• Earthquake retrofit belt added in 2010
• Footing less than the minimum standard of 6 inches in some places around reservoir perimeter
Structural • Insufficient freeboard exists due to past code changes; 3.4 feet freeboard is available, 5.9 feet is required under current code
• Sliding failure is not anticipated
• Uplift failure is not anticipated
• Compression buckling failure is not anticipated
• Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir • It is expected that the shell rings would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event
Corrosion • Coating in satisfactory condition
• Minor staining and blemishes visible
• Unable to test the cathodic protection system as the reservoir was drained Mechanical • Sample tap, isolation valves, water level controls, and chlorine system in good condition • Tideflex mixing check valves used for passive system are not watertight • No mixing when not pumping
• Isolation valves not watertight
• Operational altitude valve
Access and Safety • Fall protection, cages, and guardrails in good condition • Minor rust and wear on ladder
• The distance between guardrail posts exceeds the 8-foot standard Control System • Could not find power meter pedestal; unclear how power is getting to the site • Allen-Bradley PLC Model 5/20 should be replaced; it is past its useful life and replacements parts are only available via third party vendors
Rolling Hills – Welded Steel Reservoir, 3.1 MG
General • Overall, the reservoir is in good condition
• Reservoir overflow, hatches, vents, manways, and site security in good condition • Some visible site degradation due to erosion and corrosion • Entire footing is less than the minimum standard of 6 inches above the ground surface elevation • Minor rust on reservoir belt
• Minor erosion of reservoir chime
Structural • Insufficient freeboard exists due to past code changes; 2.7 feet of freeboard is available,

5.4 feet is required under current code
• Sliding failure is not anticipated
• Uplift failure is not anticipated
• Compression buckling failure is not anticipated
• Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir • It is expected that the shell rings would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event
Corrosion • Coating in satisfactory condition
• Minor staining and blemishes visible
N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4-Tbls

Page 5 of 5 ends

Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and
Risk Assessment TM
Table 3. Reservoir Observations and Concerns
Site Observations, Issues, and Concerns
(a)
Mechanical • Sample tap, inlet and outlet piping, isolation valve with MOV, water level controls, and chlorine system in good condition
• Inoperable altitude valve
Access and Safety • Fall protection, cages, and guardrails in good condition • Tank has ladder cages
Control System • Water is coming out of the pedestal conduit and is flowing onto the ground; algae is growing on the wet surfaces
• Allen-Bradley PLC Model 5/20 should be replaced; it is past its useful life and replacements parts are only available via third party vendors
(a) Bold entries indicate greater concerns warranting attention. All other entries are either lesser concerns or observations.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 9 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
It should be noted that requirements have changed since some of the reservoirs were constructed and as a result some of the inspected reservoirs are not in conformance with certain current code requirements or standards; however, such nonconformance does not necessarily warrant action. For example, certain reservoirs do not meet existing standards for footing height above existing ground elevation; however, such standards are based on concerns about flooding of the area around the reservoir, which in most cases is not a concern given the reservoir locations on hilltops or other areas not prone to flooding.

Moreover, bringing a substandard footing height into conformance with existing standards would require significant regrading of the site, with little or no commensurate benefit. Accordingly, this assessment takes into account the practicality and actual benefits of bringing existing reservoirs into conformance with applicable codes and standards, with a focus on the identification of improvements that are cost-effective and result in measurable benefits.

It should also be noted that several reservoirs do not meet current seismic standards, such as freeboard and anchorage; however, this nonconformance is due to changes in applicable codes since the reservoirs were constructed. Changes in operations can bring those reservoirs into compliance with current code requirements and are identified in this TM where applicable.

As of November 2018, safety cages are not considered OSHA compliant for fixed ladder fall protection.

The current OSHA standards requires either a personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system and are defined as follows:
• A Personal Fall Arrest System is a system that arrests a person’s fall from a ladder. The system consists of anchorage, a body harness, connector, and deceleration device or lifeline.

An example of this system is provided in Appendix D.
• A Ladder Safety System is a system designed to eliminate or reduce the possibility of falling from a ladder. A ladder safety system usually consists of a carrier, a lanyard, connectors, and a body harness. These systems include options for either a flexible cable or a rigid rail system. Examples are provided in Appendix D.

Per OHSA requirements, by November of 2036, all cages on a fixed ladder shall be replaced by either a personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system. Since compliance with this requirement is still several years out, it is recommended that the safety cages be removed, and an approved fall protection system be installed when other recommended improvements are implemented.

Cement Hill
Cement Hill is a buried concrete reservoir constructed in 1989. The reservoir is rectangular in shape and has approximately 2 feet of soil on the top slab. The water height is 24 feet, and the outside dimensions are approximately 316 feet by 199 feet. The capacity of the reservoir is approximately 10.0 MG.

Overall, the Cement Hill reservoir is in good condition. There is visible degradation, but its function is not impaired. The reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, potential site access by local cattle herds, and site lighting. A full engineering evaluation of the reservoir should be performed by temporarily taking the reservoir out of service and inspecting the interior.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 10 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Photo 1
Cement Hill valve vault
Photo 2
Cement Hill Reservoir interior
Eastridge
Eastridge is a buried concrete reservoir constructed in 2003. The reservoir is rectangular in shape and has approximately 2 feet of soil on the top slab. The water height is 24 feet, and the outside dimensions are approximately 316 by 316 feet. The capacity of the reservoir is approximately 16.0 MG.

Overall, the Eastridge reservoir is in poor condition. There is visible degradation, and its function is moderately impaired. The reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, site ponding, insufficient rebar cover, and antiquated PLC equipment.

Photo 3
Eastridge Reservoir
Photo 4
Eastridge Reservoir cell B interior
TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 11 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Goldridge
Goldridge is a 2.2 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 2004. The reservoir has a diameter of 122 feet and a water height of 26.5 feet. Hold-down chairs are provided around the perimeter of the reservoir.

Overall, the Goldridge reservoir is in good condition with some slight visible degradation. The reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, insufficient freeboard, seismic overstressing concerns, inoperable altitude valving, and antiquated PLC equipment.

Photo 5
Goldridge Reservoir
Photo 6
Goldridge Reservoir interior ladder
Mangels
Mangels is a 1.0 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1990 and rehabilitated in 2010. The reservoir has a diameter of 103 feet and a water height of 16 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir. Overall, the Mangels reservoir is in excellent condition. The Mangels reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, insufficient freeboard, and antiquated PLC equipment.

Photo 7
Mangels Reservoir
Photo 8
Mangels Reservoir chime
TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 12 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Martin Hill
Martin Hill is a 2.7 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1980 and rehabilitated in 2010. The reservoir has a diameter of 135 feet and a water height of 25 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir.

Overall, the Martin Hill reservoir is in good condition with some slight visible degradation. The Martin Hill reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, insufficient freeboard, and seismic overstressing concerns.

Photo 9
Martin Hill Reservoir
Photo 10
Martin Hill Reservoir chime
Nelson Hill
Nelson Hill is a buried concrete reservoir constructed in 1984. The reservoir is rectangular in shape and does not have soil on the top slab. The water height is approximately 24 feet, and the outside dimensions are approximately 357 feet by 316 feet. The capacity of the reservoir is approximately 12.0 MG.

Overall, the Nelson Hill reservoir is in excellent condition. The Nelson Hill reservoir shows issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration and insufficient rebar cover.

Photo 11
Nelson Hill Reservoir roof top slab
Photo 12
Nelson Hill Reservoir interior
TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 13 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Rancho Solano 3
The Rancho Solano 3 is a 3.1 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1988 and rehabilitated in 2009.

The reservoir has a diameter of 143 feet and a water height of 25 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir. The reservoir was retrofitted in 2008 with two “girdle” bands to improve the ability to resist hoop stresses.

Overall, the Rancho Solano 3 reservoir is in good condition. The Rancho Solano 3 reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, insufficient freeboard, seismic overstressing concerns, and antiquated PLC equipment.

Photo 13
Rancho Solano 3 Reservoir interior
Photo 14
Rancho Solano 3 Reservoir
Rolling Hills
Rolling Hills is a 3.1 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1989 and rehabilitated in 2010. The reservoir has a diameter of 143 feet and a water height of 25 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir. The reservoir was retrofitted in 2009 with two “girdle” bands to improve the ability to resist hoop stresses.

Overall, the Rolling Hills reservoir is in good condition. The reservoir shows various issues of concern related to equipment/surface deterioration, insufficient freeboard, water emanating from the pedestal conduit, inoperable altitude valving, and antiquated PLC equipment.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 14 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Photo 15
Rolling Hills Reservoir
Photo 16
Rolling Hills Reservoir chime

RISK ASSESSMENT
Critical asset condition and performance information collected during the reservoir site visits was used to perform a risk assessment of reservoir facilities. The risk assessment considers both likelihood of failure (LOF) ratings and consequence of failure (COF) ratings to quantify the risks associated with each asset and reservoir facility. Risk results were used to prioritize rehabilitation, replacement, or maintenance actions to meet established service reliability and performance goals.

The risk assessment methodology and results presented in this section are consistent with the results presented in the Condition Assessment section above and with the City’s 2023 Pump Station Asset Management Plan. These results are used as the basis for prioritization of capital improvements described in the Recommended Improvements section later in this TM. Capital improvement project costs and prioritization will be presented in Chapter 9 of the PUMP Report.

Key topics addressed in this section include:
• Risk Methods
• Asset Risk Results
• Reservoir Risk Results
The general approach used in the risk assessment is illustrated in Figure 1. The risk assessment involves development of LOF, COF, and risk scores for each individual asset, and each reservoir facility as a whole.

A rating for LOF is given to each individual asset and those ratings contribute to the overall LOF rating for each reservoir. In addition, a rating for COF is assigned to each reservoir, which is inherited by all individual assets at that reservoir. Asset risk is then calculated based on those asset LOF and asset COF scores.

Similarly, reservoir LOF and COF scores are combined to determine a comprehensive risk score and rating for each reservoir.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 15 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Figure 1. Reservoir Risk Assessment Methodology
Risk Methods
This section describes the methods used to perform the LOF and COF analyses and to determine the resulting risk level for each individual asset and each reservoir facility assessed for the PUMP.

Asset LOF
The asset LOF analysis considers the probability that a failure of a given asset will occur. The analysis includes two “failure modes”, specifically Physical Mortality and Level of Service. The factors considered in assessing each of these failure modes are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Criteria Used for Asset LOF Evaluation
Failure Mode Criteria/Factor Description
Physical
Mortality Condition Rating
An asset with visible degradation is more likely to fail. While condition and age are often interdependent, newer components may be in poor condition due to environmental conditions or improper maintenance. Condition ratings are assigned to assets during the on-site condition assessment described previously.

Level of Service Performance Rating
An asset that does not perform as designed or intended is a level of service failure. Something does not have to physically happen to the asset for level of service failure to occur.

Asset performance may affect the level of service provided by the reservoir, depending on the role of that asset in day-to-day operations. Performance ratings were assigned to assets based on information obtained during the on-site condition assessment and West Yost’s understanding of the water system operations.

The LOF factors above are translated into numeric rankings of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating the highest LOF. An overall LOF score is determined by adding the two ratings, so each asset will have an overall LOF score of between 2 and 10. The factors and their range of potential ratings for each category are presented in Table 5.

Asset Risk
Asset LOF Asset COF
Reservoir LOF Reservoir COF
Reservoir Risk
TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 16 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Table 5. Reservoir LOF Rating Factors
Failure Mode Criteria/Factor
Rating
1 2 3 4 5
Physical
Mortality
Condition
Rating Excellent Slight Visible Degradation
Visible
Degradation
Integrity
Moderately
Compromised
Integrity
Severely
Compromised
Level of Service Performance
Rating
Functioning
as intended
In service, but
elevated O&M
costs
In service, but
function is
moderately
impaired
In Service, but
Function is
Highly Impaired
Not
Functioning as
Intended
Reservoir LOF
The LOF for each reservoir was evaluated by averaging the LOF scores of individual assets within each reservoir. Similar to the LOF scoring for assets, the reservoir LOF is rated on a 2 to 10 scale.

Asset and Reservoir COF
The COF analysis considers the impact that an asset or reservoir failure may have on the water system as a whole. As described previously, the COF was evaluated at the reservoir level, and all assets within that reservoir inherit the same COF score. This approach is based on the assumption that due to the relatively small number of assets at a reservoir, all assets are critical to reservoir operation. For each category, the criteria considered in determining the potential COF are presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Criteria Used for Reservoir COF Evaluation
Category Criteria/Factor Description
Operating Ability Type of Customers
in Zone
Water service disruptions impact the community while service is being restored. Critical customers (e.g., hospitals, industries, etc.) may have limited ability to handle prolonged water outages.

Service Reliability Ability to Meet Demand
Scenarios
Depending on the redundancy built into the system, certain zones may be able to meet service demands even with one reservoir offline. Some zones are constructed with no storage redundancy (i.e., Goldridge, Mangels, and Rancho Solano 3); for these reservoirs, there are additional consequences if the reservoir is taken offline for repairs or to be replaced. Since there is no another reservoir available to support the pressure zone, in the event that one of these reservoirs is removed from service, the sole source of supply to the pressure zone becomes the pump station(s) serving the zone. Therefore, in order to assess the severity of an outage for reservoirs in zones with no storage redundancy, the capacity of the pump station(s) serving each of these zones was evaluated for the ability of the pumps to compensate for a sudden lack of storage in the zone. Pump station(s) were reviewed to determine whether they could meet the greatest potential fire flow requirement in the zone, as well as the maximum day demand (MDD) for the zone. If the pump station(s) cannot meet one or both of these requirements on their own (i.e., fire flow and/or MDD), then it is more consequential if the reservoir that supports that pressure zone is taken offline.

The COF factors shown in Table 6 were translated into numeric rankings of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating the highest or worst consequence. Each reservoir is evaluated for the two factors, then are added together, with a resultant overall COF score between 2 and 10. This overall COF is assigned to all assets at that reservoir. The factors and their range of potential ratings for each category are presented in Table 7.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 17 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Table 7. Reservoir COF Rating Factors
Consequence Factor
Rating (1 being the lowest, 5 being the highest)
1 2 3 4 5
Operating
Ability
Type of
Customers
in Zone
Residential Educational/
Commercial Correctional Industrial Hospital
Service
Reliability
Ability to
Meet
Demand
Scenarios
All storage
requirements
(operational,
emergency,
and fire) are
met in the
zone
Emergency or
fire storage
are not met
(operational
storage met)
No storage
redundancy
(one reservoir in
zone) but pump
station
supplying zone
can meet MDD
plus fire flow(a)
No storage
redundancy
(one reservoir in
zone) and pump
station cannot
meet MDD plus
fire flow(a)
No storage
redundancy
(one reservoir in
zone) and pump
station cannot
meet MDD(a)
(a) Pump station capacity is assumed to be firm, meaning the largest pump is offline at each pump station. The capacity per pump at each pump station is based on the measured flow of each pump, as recorded in Table 2-2 of the City's Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update (West Yost, 2023).

Reservoir Risk Score Calculation
Upon determining all of the asset LOF and COF scores, a risk score is calculated for each reservoir using the following formula:

Reservoir Risk Score = Average of Asset LOF Scores x Reservoir COF Score Asset Risk Results
As noted above, the aggregated score for asset LOF and COF ranges from 2 to 10. By plotting the LOF and COF scores against each other, an overall risk level is assigned to each asset group. Risk levels are prioritized into five risk levels: Low, Medium-Low, Medium, Medium-High, and High, each of which is color-coded in Table 8. Table 8 shows the total number of assets that fall into each LOF and COF category.

These risk levels are assigned to the various cells using best engineering judgment to determine which combinations of score warrant the highest levels of concern versus those that warrant lesser levels of concern. Risk levels have been adjusted from those developed in the City’s 2023 Pump Station Asset Management Plan.

TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 18 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Table 8. Reservoir Asset Risk Level Results
Number of
Assets
COF Score
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
LOF Score
2 0 1 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 12
3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
4 5 5 0 10 5 1 0 0 0 26
5 0 2 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 11
6 5 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 0 15
7 3 3 0 2 6 7 0 0 0 21
8 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3
9 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 7
10 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Total 13 13 0 25 38 11 0 0 0 100
Risk Levels Low Medium-Low Medium Medium-High High
The asset risk assessment results are summarized in Table 9, which lists the total number and percentage of components that fall in each risk level. The majority of the assets (71 percent) fall into the Medium or Medium-Low risk level.

Table 9. Reservoir Asset Risk Level Results Summary
Risk Level Number of Assets Percent of Total
Low 3 3
Medium-Low 39 39
Medium 32 32
Medium-High 24 24
High 2 2
Total 100 100%
TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 19 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Reservoir Risk Results
Figure 2 shows the percentage of assets in each reservoir that fall within each risk level (as represented by the colored bars). As shown in the figure, Eastridge reservoir is composed of approximately 90-percent of High and Medium-High risk assets, whereas Martin Hill reservoir has no High or Medium-High risk assets.

Figure 2. Risk Levels of Assets by Reservoir, Percent of Total 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cement Hill Eastridge Goldridge Mangels Martin Hill Nelson Hill Rancho Solano 3
Rolling Hills
Percent of Total Number of Components in Risk Level Per Reservoir High Med-High Medium Med-Low Low
TM – City of Fairfield
February 2, 2024

Page 20 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4
Table 10 presents the average asset LOF score, COF score, risk score, and risk level for each reservoir, ranked from highest to lowest risk. As indicated in Table 10, Eastridge is rated as a Medium-High risk reservoir, Rolling Hills and Martin Hill are rated as Medium-Low risk reservoirs, while the other five reservoirs are all rated as Medium risk. These results provide the basis for prioritizing the timing of the capital improvements described later in this TM. It should be noted that these results do not directly indicate a safety, health, or other risk to the City or its residents, rather, they should be used to assist the City in identifying facilities to be prioritized during capital improvement planning.

Table 10. Reservoir Risk Assessment Results by Reservoir Reservoir
LOF Score
(average of
assets) COF Score
Risk
Score
Risk
Levell
(Priority)
Eastridge 7.1 7 49.6 Medium-High
Rancho Solano 3 5.3 6 31.5 Medium
Nelson Hill 4.7 6 28.0 Medium
Goldridge 5.4 5 27.1 Medium
Mangels 4.5 6 27.0 Medium
Cement Hill 5.3 5 26.4 Medium
Rolling Hills 5.5 3 16.4 Medium-Low
Martin Hill 5.5 2 10.9 Medium-Low

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Recommendations for improvements at each reservoir are listed in Table 11. Key items of note affecting multiple reservoirs include the following:

1. All sites require repairing of cracks/leaks and/or spot repair of corroded elements.

2. Five sites (Eastridge, Goldridge, Mangels, Rancho Solano 3, and Rolling Hills) require replacement of existing antiquated PLC equipment.

3. Four sites (Goldridge, Martin Hill, Rancho Solano 3, and Rolling Hills) require reinforcement of the reservoir to mitigate seismic overstressing.

4. Test CP system at Rancho Solano 3 when water is in the reservoir. Confirm location of rectifier or anode junction box to test CP system at Martin Hill and confirm it is working properly.

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM4-Tbls
City of Fairfield
Water Storage Reservoirs Condition and
Risk Assessment TM
Table 11. Reservoir Improvement Recommendations
Reservoir/Type Recommendations
Cement Hill –
Concrete
• Repair all cracks/leaks with epoxy injection
• Perform a full engineering evaluation of reservoir when able to access reservoir interior • Install cattle fence
• Replace broken lights
Eastridge –
Concrete
• Mitigate site ponding
• Repair all cracks/leaks with epoxy injection
• Perform a more extensive reinforcing study to determine the limits of reinforcing that is not in the proper location • Determine wall thickness to calculate the as-built “d” distance (i.e., the distance between the compression face and the tension reinforcing).
• Replace the existing Allen-Bradley Model 5/20 PLC
Goldridge –
Welded Steel
• Spot repair surface corrosion and deterioration during next maintenance cycle • Repair gaps between chime and foundation where the grout has failed with sealant or mastic • Enlist a corrosion engineer to annually inspect the cathodic protection system • Lower operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2 feet to mitigate insufficient freeboard • Reinforce bottom two rings of the reservoir to mitigate seismic overstressing • Replace the existing Allen-Bradley Model 5/20 PLC
• Replace altitude valve with motor operated valve
• Remove ladder cage and replace with personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system by November 2036 Mangels –
Welded Steel
• Spot repair surface corrosion and deterioration during next maintenance cycle • Repair gaps between chime and foundation where the grout has failed with sealant or mastic • Enlist a corrosion engineer to annually inspect the cathodic protection system • Lower operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2.5 feet to mitigate insufficient freeboard • Replace the existing Allen-Bradley Model 5/20 PLC
• Remove ladder cage and replace with personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system by November 2036 Martin Hill –
Welded Steel
• Spot repair surface corrosion and deterioration during next maintenance cycle • Repair gaps between chime and foundation where the grout has failed with sealant or mastic • Locate rectifier or anode junction box to test existing cathodic protection system and confirm it is operating properly • Lower operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2.75 feet to mitigate insufficient freeboard • Reinforce bottom two rings of the reservoir to mitigate seismic overstressing • Remove ladder cage and replace with personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system by November 2036 Nelson Hill –
Concrete
• Repair all cracks/leaks with epoxy injection
• Investigate 1¼-inch rebar cover to determine whether this is an anomaly, or a significant portion of the reinforcing has suboptimal cover Rancho Solano 3 –
Welded Steel
• Spot repair surface corrosion and deterioration during next maintenance cycle • Repair gaps between chime and foundation where the grout has failed with sealant or mastic • Test existing cathodic protection system when tank is not drained • Lower operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2.75 feet to mitigate insufficient freeboard • Reinforce rings of the reservoir to mitigate seismic overstressing • Replace the existing Allen-Bradley Model 5/20 PLC
• Remove ladder cage and replace with personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system by November 2036 Rolling Hills –
Welded Steel
• Spot repair surface corrosion and deterioration during next maintenance cycle • Repair gaps between chime and foundation where the grout has failed with sealant or mastic • Enlist a corrosion engineer to annually inspect the cathodic protection system • Replace the existing Allen-Bradley Model 5/20 PLC
• Replace altitude valve with motor operated valve
• Address issue of water coming out of the pedestal conduit • Remove ladder cage and replace with personal fall arrest system or ladder safety system by November 2036 JDH Corrosion Assessment
Appendix A
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Well Pump - WWP071 M
M
M
Pump Motor A
A
Motor Starter A
A

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Check for any excessive heat coming from any wires or connections with a infrared thermometer Deenergize panel and tighten all electrical connections Well Pump and Motor - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Check for unusual sounds or vibrations
Verify flow and pressure data are within designed range Check discharge head for any leaks
Check current draw from each phase by clipping a CT ammeter around each wire and record readings while the pump is running at constant outlet pressure and flow.

Turn off power and disconnect the motor wire leads in the control box. With an ohmmeter measure the resistance between the leads and record the values.

Reference Grundfos SP/SPE Installation and Operating Instructions pages 26-29 for more information
N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
ARV's - 561/562
M
ARV's - 563
M

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
www.valmatic.com
Air Release Valves - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Valves require no schedule lubrication and/or maintenance Check valves for leaks, if leakage occurs repair valve as needed.

Reference Val-Matic O&M Manual ARSL-OM1-3 page 3 for more information Valve requires no schedule lubrication and/or maintenance Check valve for leaks, if leakage occurs repair valve as needed.

Reference Val-Matic O&M Manual ARCO-OM1-4 page 5 for more information N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency Description of Maintenance Task
Process Key
Check Valves - WCV071/072/073 Valves require no schedule lubrication and/or maintenance Q Inspect for leakage by listening for leakage noise from the valve while the pump is shut down.

Reference Val-Matic O&M page 6
https://www.valmatic.com/Portals/0/pdfs/SCV-OM1-4.pdf

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Check Valves - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Flow Meter - WFM007 A

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Flow Meter - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Calibrate Flow Meter
https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/manual-rosemount-8750w-transmitter-hartprotocol-reference-en-4854858.pdf N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Filter Vessel SST
Filters A

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Filter Vessel - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Inspect filter vessel, vessel bolts and Buna-N O-ring for any damage Replace 1 year after they have been put into service as long as they have not exceeded the 25-35 psi for replacement
Parker Technical Support - James Willard (940)-327-6494 N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Booster Pump - WBP007 M
M
M
A

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Booster Pump - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Check for unusual sounds or vibrations when the well pump is operating Check and record flow and pressure data and verify that they are in the expected ranges Check all pump connections for any leaks
Pump bearings and shaft seal are maintenance free
Motors fitted with grease fittings must be lubricated with a high temperature lithium-based grease.

Grease motor before removing it from service if motor is going to be idle for more than 6 months Reference instructions on fan cover and operating hours chart on pare 11 of the Grundfos O&M Manual
N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Flow Control and Pressure Reducing
Valve - PRC082
Q

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Flow Control and Pressure Reducing Valve - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Description of Maintenance Task
Valves require no schedule lubrication and/or maintenance Inspect valve for proper operation.

Reference CLA-VAL O&M Manual 49-01/649-01 pages 4 and 5 for disassembly instructions if needed.
www.cla-val.com
N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Pump Head A
Chemical Injector A
Chemical Piping/Tubing M
A
Pulsation Dampener M
Ferric Sulfate Tank M
Poly-Spillcart M
A

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Inspect Tank for any cracks or other structural issues
Inspect cart containment for any ferric sulfate or other liquid Inspect cart for any cracks or other structural issues
Ferric Sulfate System - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Description of Maintenance Task
Rebuild Pump Head - Reference Meter Pump Instructions Manual for detailed instructions Remove clean and/or rebuild injector - Reference Meter Pump Instructions Manual for detailed instructions
http://lmipumpcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/LMI-ROYTRONIC-A-Series-MeteringPump-Instruction-Manual.pdf Inspect all piping and tubing for any leakage or signs of wear or other issues Replace Tubing as needed
Check pulsation dampener to verify static PSI is in expected range N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency Description of Maintenance Task
Process Key
Tablet Chlorinator Cleaning A Clean Chlorination System - Reference Page 7, section B for detailed instructions http://puraquaproducts.com/product-documents/Manual-Accu-Tab-3075-Chlorinator.pdf Chlorinator Valve Cleaning A Disassemble and clean Float, Check and Solenoid valves Reference Accu-Tab 3075 O&M Manual for troubleshooting information Chlorinator Booster Pump A Motors fitted with grease fittings must be lubricated with a high temperature lithium-based grease.

Grease motor before removing it from service if motor is going to be idle for more than 6 months Reference instructions on fan cover and operating hours chart on pare 11 of the Grundfos O&M Manual

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Chlorinator - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Mentenance Schdules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Chlorine Analyzer - WCLAN007 SST/D
SST/M
SSH

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Chlorine Analyzer - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Verify/Compare Analyzer reading to hand held colorimeter Calibrate Analyzer per Manufactures Recommendations
Clean and Shutdown Analyzer per Manufactures Recommendations O&M manual not Available online at this time.
https://www.evoqua.com/en/evoqua/products--services/disinfection-systems/disinfectionprocess-analyzers--controllers/depolox-400-m-analyzer/ N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Emergency Shower and Eye /Face
Wash M

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Emergency Shower and Eye/Face Wash - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Description of Maintenance Task
Operate Emergency Shower and Eyewash and verify proper operation Disassemble and clean shower head and eyewash diffusers as needed to maintain adequate flow Reference Haws Installation and O&M Instructions for more Information https://www.hawsco.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8300-8300CRP.pdf N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
HVAC Units SA
Exhaust Fan SA

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down

HVAC - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Check unit for proper operation and clean unit filters
https://na2.electroluxmedia.com/Original/Electrolux/Electrolux%20Assets/Document/Complete% 20Owners%20Guide/English/16120300A31829en.pdf
Check unit for proper operation and any unusual sounds or vibration N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Well Level Transmitter A
A

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Well Level Transmitter - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Description of Maintenance Task
Check well level reading and record
Calibrate well level transmitter per manufactures recommendations https://www.drexelbrook.com/-/media/ametekdrexelbrook/download_links/manual-universal-vlevel-system.pdf?la=en&revision=09186487-9af5-4c33-8947-0be0936e6609 N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
Equipment Frequency
Process Key
Exterior Building and Area Lights Q
Interior Emergency Lights Q
MCC Q
A
Backflow Device A
Fire Extinguishers M

FREQUENCY KEY
D - Daily
W - Weekly
M - Monthly
Q - Quarterly
SA - Semi-Annually
A - Annually
SST - Seasonal Start-Up
SSH - Seasonal Shut-Down
Check all fire extinguisher to verify extinguisher indication is in the GREEN

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Description of Maintenance Task
Check lights for proper operation
Check lights for proper operation
Push to Test Status Indication lights to verify proper indication Clean all MCC cooling fans air filters
Verify BFD has been tested annually
N-C-405-60-19-73-WP-R-OPS PLAN-App A
City of Santa Rosa
Operations Plan - Appendix A
Equipment Maintenance Schedules
TJC Structural Assessment
Appendix B
City of Fairfield
Condition Assessment
of
Eight Reservoirs
Fairfield, California
TJCAA PROJECT NO. 122084
Date: JULY 2023
Prepared by:

Terence Cavanagh, S.E.

TJC and Associates, Inc.

D R A F T
City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 2

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 3

2. RESERVOIR DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS ............................................... 3

2.1 Concrete Reservoirs ........................................................................ 4

2.2 Welded Steel Reservoirs .................................................................. 5

2.3 Rolling Hills Reservoir ...................................................................... 7

3. LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................... 8

4. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .......................................................................... 8

4.1 Concrete Reservoirs ........................................................................ 8

4.2 Welded Steel Reservoirs .................................................................. 8 Appendix A – JDH Report ................................................................................ 10

REVISION RECORD
Revision No.
0 Original
City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 3

1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Fairfield is developing a Water Utility Master Plan and conducting a Rate Study Project. As part of plan development, TJC and Associates, Inc. (TJCAA) is providing structural evaluation of water system facilities. This report documents the results of TJCAA’s limited structural evaluation of storage reservoirs in the water system.

This evaluation included review of available documentation including a condition assessment report developed by JDH Consultants, Inc. (JDH) for this project. The following reservoirs are included in this assessment.

Concrete Reservoirs

1. Cement Hill Reservoir – 10 million gallon (MG) concrete tank (circa 1989)

2. Eastridge Reservoir – 16 MG concrete tank (circa 2003)

3. Nelson Hill Reservoir – 12 MG concrete tank (circa 1984) Welded Steel Reservoirs

1. Gold Ridge Reservoir – 2.2 MG welded steel tank (circa 2004)

2. Mangels Reservoir – 1.0 MG welded steel tank (circa 1990)

3. Martin Hill Reservoir – 2.7 MG welded steel tank (circa 2010)

4. Rancho Solano 3 Reservoir – 3.1 MG welded steel tank (circa 1988)

5. Rolling Hills Reservoir – 3.1 MG welded steel tank (circa 1989) TJCAA was retained by the City to provide a preliminary structural assessment of the tanks’ as-built conditions. TJCAA did not perform a visual inspection of the reservoirs, however, JDH performed a visual inspection and provided a report detailing an assessment of the existing condition of the reservoirs. In addition to a visual inspection, JDH also provided the following:

1. Ultrasonic Thickness Survey – estimated thicknesses of the various steel plates in the welded steel reservoirs.

2. Coating Thickness Testing – estimated thicknesses of the coating on various steel plates in the welded steel reservoirs.

3. Ground-Penetrating Radar – estimated depth and spacing for the rebar in the cast-in-place concrete reservoirs.

The JDH report can be found in Appendix A.

2. RESERVOIR DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS
TJCAA’s assessment of the reservoirs was limited to review of available engineering drawings for each reservoir and data provided by JDH in its condition assessment report (Appendix A).

City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 4

2.1 Concrete Reservoirs

2.1.1 Cement Hill Reservoir
The Cement Hill Tank is a buried concrete reservoir constructed in 1989. The reservoir is rectangular in shape and has approximately 2 feet of soil on the top slab. The water height is 24 feet and the outside dimensions are approximately 316 x 199 feet. The capacity of the reservoir is approximately 10 MG.

Photos of the reservoir appear to show that it is in relatively good condition. No significant structural issues were reported by JDH. JDH was not, however, able to access the interior of the reservoir and therefore was only able to take photographs of the interior from the roof access hatch.

Based on review of the record drawings, the reservoir appears to have been constructed in a manner consistent with other reservoirs in the late 1980s. No significant structural issues were identified through TJCAA’s review of the as-built drawings. However, due to significant increases in design seismic ground motion values over the past 30 years, TJCAA recommends a full engineering evaluation of the reservoir components.

2.1.2 Eastridge Reservoir
Eastridge Reservoir is a buried concrete reservoir constructed in 2003. The reservoir is rectangular in shape and has approximately 2 feet of soil on the top slab. The water height is 24 feet and the outside dimensions are approximately 316 x 316 feet. The capacity of the reservoir is approximately 16 MG.

Photos of the reservoir appear to show that it is in relatively good condition. No significant structural issues were reported by JDH. JDH did, however, identify some leakage that has occurred through the walls from one cell to another, and one area of copper corrosion staining. Both items can cause corrosion in the reinforcing steel and therefore should be rectified as soon as possible.

Based on review of the record drawings, the reservoir appears to have been constructed in a manner consistent with other reservoirs in the early 2000s. No significant structural issues were identified through TJCAA’s review of the as-built drawings.

One item that came up during the review of JDH’s data is the concrete cover of the rebar. TJCAA noticed that cover over the various reinforcing bars ranges from ⅝ inch to 4⅞ inches for the primary reinforcing. Typical concrete cover for these types of structures is specified as 2 inches. Reduced cover can reduce the protection to the reinforcing steel. Increased cover can reduce the “d” distance (distance between the compression face and the tension reinforcing) within the wall and therefore reduce the wall’s capacity to carry the design loads.

TJCAA recommends performing a more extensive reinforcing study to determine the limits of reinforcing that is not in the proper location. In addition, the actual wall thickness should be determined to calculate the as-built “d” distance. In addition to further field investigation, due to increases in design seismic ground motion values over the past 20 years, TJCAA recommends a full engineering evaluation of the reservoir components.

City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 5

2.1.3 Nelson Hill Reservoir
Nelson Hill Reservoir is a buried concrete reservoir constructed in 1984. The reservoir is rectangular in shape and does not have soil on the top slab. The water height is approximately 24 feet and the outside dimensions are approximately 357 x 316 feet.

The capacity of the reservoir is approximately 12 MG.

Photos of the reservoir appear to show that it is in relatively good condition. No significant structural issues were reported by JDH. JDH did, however, identify some leakage that has occurred through the walls from one cell to another. This leakage can corrode the reinforcing steel and therefore should be rectified as soon as possible.

Based on review of the record drawings, the reservoir appears to have been constructed in a manner consistent with other reservoirs in the early 1980s. No significant structural issues were identified through TJCAA’s review of the as-built drawings.

Concrete cover over the primary reinforcing ranged from 1¼ to 2⅝ inches. While these values are less critical than the cover found in the Eastridge Reservoir, the 1¼-inch cover should be further investigated to determine whether this is an anomaly, or a significant portion of the reinforcing has suboptimal cover. In addition to further field investigation, due to significant increases in design seismic ground motion values over the past 40 years, TJCAA recommends a full engineering evaluation of the reservoir components.

2.2 Welded Steel Reservoirs

2.2.1 Gold Ridge Reservoir
Gold Ridge Reservoir is a 2.2 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 2004. The reservoir has a 122-foot diameter and a water height of 26.5 feet. Hold-down chairs are provided around the perimeter of the reservoir.

Photos of the reservoir show that it appears to be in relatively good condition. No significant structural issues were reported by JDH. JDH did, however, identify some areas of corrosion that should be spot-repaired. In addition, JDH identified loss of grout below the chime plate. This should be rectified as soon as possible.

TJCAA performed engineering calculations in accordance with AWWA D100-21 to determine maximum anticipated slosh height, anticipated potential for sliding, anticipated potential for uplift, maximum compression buckling stress, and maximum hoop stress. For the design seismic event, TJCAA’s findings are as follows:
• Slosh Height – 5.6 feet – Insufficient freeboard has been provided. • Available Freeboard – 4 feet.
• Sliding – Failure due to sliding is not anticipated.
• Uplift – Failure due to uplift is not anticipated.
• Buckling – Failure due to compression buckling is not anticipated. • Hoop Stress – The bottom two rings of the reservoir would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event. Reinforcement will be required to correct this condition.

Insufficient freeboard may be mitigated by lowering the operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2 feet.

City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 6

2.2.2 Mangels Tank
Mangels Reservoir is a 1.0 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1990. The reservoir has a 103-foot diameter and a water height of 16 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir.

Photos of the reservoir appear to show that it is in relatively good condition. No significant structural issues were reported by JDH. JDH did, however, identify some areas of corrosion that should be spot-repaired. In addition, JDH identified loss of grout below the chime plate. This should be rectified as soon as possible.

TJCAA performed engineering calculations in accordance with AWWA D100-21 to determine maximum anticipated slosh height, anticipated potential for sliding, anticipated potential for uplift, maximum compression buckling stress, and maximum hoop stress. For the design seismic event, TJCAA’s findings are as follows:
• Slosh Height – 5.0 feet – Insufficient freeboard has been provided. • Available Freeboard – 3 feet.
• Sliding – Failure due to sliding is not anticipated.
• Uplift – Failure due to uplift is not anticipated.
• Buckling – Failure due to compression buckling is not anticipated. • Hoop Stress – Failure due to hoop tensile stress is not anticipated.

Insufficient freeboard may be mitigated by lowering the operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2.5 feet.

2.2.3 Martin Hill Reservoir
Martin Hill Reservoir is a 2.7 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 2010. The reservoir has a 135-foot diameter and a water height of 25 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir.

TJCAA performed engineering calculations in accordance with AWWA D100-21 to determine maximum anticipated slosh height, anticipated potential for sliding, anticipated potential for uplift, maximum compression buckling stress, and maximum hoop stress. For the design seismic event, TJCAA’s findings are as follows:
• Slosh Height – 5.7 feet – Insufficient freeboard has been provided. • Available Freeboard – 3.2 feet.
• Sliding – Failure due to sliding is not anticipated.
• Uplift – Failure due to uplift is not anticipated.
• Buckling – Failure due to compression buckling is not anticipated. • Hoop Stress – The bottom two rings of the reservoir would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event. Reinforcement will be required to correct this condition.

Insufficient freeboard may be mitigated by lowering the operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2.75 feet.

City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 7

2.2.4 Rancho Solano 3 Reservoir
The Rancho Solano 3 Reservoir is a 3.0 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1988.

The reservoir has a 143-foot diameter and a water height of 25 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir. The reservoir was retrofitted in 2008 with two “girdle” bands to improve the ability to resist hoop stresses.

TJCAA performed engineering calculations in accordance with AWWA D100-21 to determine maximum anticipated slosh height, anticipated potential for sliding, anticipated potential for uplift, maximum compression buckling stress, and maximum hoop stress. For the design seismic event, TJCAA’s findings are as follows:
• Slosh Height – 5.9 feet – Insufficient freeboard has been provided. • Available Freeboard – 3.4 feet.
• Sliding – Failure due to sliding is not anticipated.
• Uplift – Failure due to uplift is not anticipated.
• Buckling – Failure due to compression buckling is not anticipated. • Hoop Stress – All the shell rings of the reservoir would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event. Reinforcement (in addition to that already provided) will be required to correct this condition.

Insufficient freeboard may be mitigated by lowering the operating level of the reservoir by approximately 2.75 feet.

2.3 Rolling Hills Reservoir
Rolling Hills Reservoir is a 3.1 MG welded steel reservoir constructed in 1989. The reservoir has a 143-foot diameter and a water height of 25 feet. Hold-down chairs are not provided around the perimeter of the reservoir. The reservoir was retrofitted in 2009 with two “girdle” bands to improve the ability to resist hoop stresses.

TJCAA performed engineering calculations in accordance with AWWA D100-21 to determine maximum anticipated slosh height, anticipated potential for sliding, anticipated potential for uplift, maximum compression buckling stress, and maximum hoop stress. For the design seismic event, TJCAA’s findings are as follows:
• Slosh Height – 5.4 feet – Insufficient freeboard has been provided. • Available Freeboard – 2.7 feet.
• Sliding – Failure due to sliding is not anticipated.
• Uplift – Failure due to uplift is not anticipated.
• Buckling – Failure due to compression buckling is not anticipated. • Hoop Stress – All the shell rings of the reservoir would be overstressed when subjected to the design seismic event. Reinforcement (in addition to that already provided) will be required to correct this condition.

City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 8
Insufficient freeboard may be mitigated by lowering the operating level of the reservoir by approximately 3 feet.

3. LIMITATIONS
TJCAA did not receive geotechnical information for each specific site. TJCAA has assumed adequate soil for supporting the reservoirs and no significant issues related to soil that would require special foundations, such as pier-supported foundations.

TJCAA’s evaluation has been based on information provided in as-built drawings along with the JDH report. TJCAA has not ventured to assess the accuracy of the information provided. Therefore, any inaccurate information may have been used to develop the findings and recommendations within this document.

4. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

4.1 Concrete Reservoirs
The concrete reservoirs were found to be in generally good condition; however, JDH reported leaking cracks between the various cells, corrosion of concrete, and inadequate cover for the rebar. TJCAA recommends the following:

1. Repair all cracks that are leaking within the reservoirs. This can be done with epoxy injection to seal the cracks.

2. Repair and restore any corrosion that is found within the concrete.

3. Conduct a more extensive evaluation of the concrete cover to determine whether the inadequate values are isolated cases or occur throughout the reservoirs. If the locations of the inadequate cover are structurally significant, TJCAA recommends the following:
• Coating the surface to provide additional protection for the rebar. • Building up additional concrete to provide additional protection for the rebar.

Where too much cover is provided, TJCAA recommends the following:
• Engineering analysis to determine whether the resulting structural section is adequate to resist the anticipated internal forces.

4.2 Welded Steel Reservoirs
JDH identified corrosion that should be spot-repaired as soon as possible along with replacement of grout under the chime of the reservoir. JDH also recommended periodic coating and inspections of the reservoirs to keep them from deteriorating further.

TJCAA’s evaluation found that all five of the welded steel reservoirs lacked sufficient freeboard. Limited freeboard will result in water impinging on the roof plates and support beams, which may result in roof damage. In an extreme event, roof plates can tear away at the roof/shell juncture or collapse. Although damage to the tank is possible, total collapse and loss of content because of inadequate freeboard is unlikely, in part, due to the time it takes for the wave to fully load/unload the structural elements.

City of Fairfield Condition Assessment
July 2023 Page 9
One simple solution to the lack of freeboard would be to lower the operating height of the water level to allow for adequate freeboard. If this approach is not acceptable from an operations standpoint, another alternative is to raise the roof of the reservoirs by a few feet to create adequate freeboard.

ATEEM Electrical Assessment
Appendix C
Reservoir Age Functionality Age Functionality Age Functionality Age Functionality Age Functionality Age Functionality Age Functionality Cement Hill 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 3 4 4
Eastridge 3 3 4 3 5 4 1 1 4 3 4 3 4 3
Gold Ridge 4 4 4 4 5 4 2 2 4 3 1 2 N/A N/A
Mangels 4 3 4 3 5 4 1 1 4 2 4 3 N/A N/A
Martin Hill 3 3 4 3 3 3 1 1 4 3 4 3 N/A N/A
Nelson Hill 3 3 4 3 1 1 4 3 3 2 Submersible not accessible 2 1 Rancho Solano 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 1 1 4 3 Submersible not accessible N/A N/A Rolling Hills 5 4 4 3 5 4 1 1 2 2 4 3 N/A N/A
Ranking:

Notes:

Fairfield Reservoir Condition Assessment
Utility Service Panels PLC Radio Lighting Level Transmitter Flowmeter Martin Hill Micrologix 1400 PLC has recently been discontinued. Components are still available and it should be possible to continue maintaining the PLC; however, it will eventually need to be replaced.

At Rancho Solano 3, the power meter pedestal was not found; unclear how power is getting to the site.

At Nelson Hill, the Industrial Gateway communications router is not operating consistently; staff is investigating.

At Rolling Hills, water is coming out of the pedestal conduit and flowing onto the ground. Algae is growing on the wet surfaces. This situation should be corrected as soon as possible. 1 = New and/or Works As Expected; 5 = Immediately Replace/Does Not Work Allen-Bradley Model 5/20 PLCs (at Eastridge, Gold Ridge, Mangels, Rancho Solano 3, and Rolling Hills) should be replaced immediately. They are past their useful life and replacements parts are only available via third party vendors.

A number of sites have outdoor receptacles that have missing covers.

Eastridge site is subfed from a local pump station. PLC communicates via blue hose cable to the pump station PLC. Any change to either PLC will require replacement of the blue hose with more modern technology.

The Goldridge level transmitter is located within PLC control panel. Because the level transmitter is connected to a pressure tap, there is effectively a water line into the panel. The level transmitter should therefore be relocated. In addition, the electrical panels are subject to direct sunlight and steps should be taken either to shade the panels or otherwise protect them from sun exposure.

Mangels has old washdown pump starter panel in larger overall panel. The pump no longer is in service. 1 - Immediate Replace
1 - Doesn't Work Appendix C - ATEEM Reservoir-Summary (JPM revisions).xlsx 5 -New
5 - Works as Expected
OSHA Compliant Fall Protection Systems
Appendix D
6 I
3M™ DBI-SALA®
Davit Arm System Components
Variable offset davits are designed for use where multiple offset masts are required. The variable offset masts may be equipped with front mounted and/or back mounted winches or Self-Retracting
Lifelines (SRLs) and feature an anchor point rated up to 5,000 lbs. (22 kN). For applications with
overhead clearance restrictions, the adjustable
height of the variable offset masts can
eliminate the need for custom length masts
and mast extensions. Quick-connect/release
pins allow for fast and easy setup, dismantle
and transport.

Winch
Davits can be equipped with both primary
and secondary (back-up) mechanical
devices for added flexibility. Retrieval
winches can be used in conjunction with
a retrieval SRL or fall protection system to
raise and lower personnel and equipment.

Quick-mounting brackets
Simple detent-style winch mounting
brackets make installation fast and efficient.
(See page 16 for options.)
Retrieval SRL
Retrieval SRLs offer fall
protection as well as emergency
retrieval for non-entry rescue.

Lower mast
extensions
Allow the user to
adjust the overall
anchorage height
of the system.

Base options
Several portable and fixed base options are
available for complete versatility.
3 4
1 2
3 4
5 Variable offset mast
Adjustable length of davit ensures
lifelines are always centered over
confined space.

Built-in pulleys
Route lifelines of two mechanical
devices for smooth, efficient
operation.

Fall arrest anchorage
Up to a 5,000 lb. (22 kN) rated
anchor point for fall arrest device.

Adjustable height
Eliminates the need
for custom length
masts and extensions.
6 7
8 9
2 1
5 9
6 7
8 I 9
Davit Arms - One Piece Adjustable Offset Davit Masts
Configurable Davit Systems
8518382
Weight:
31 lbs. (14.1 kg)66 in.–76 in. (167.6 cm–193 cm)

11.5 in.–27.5 in.
(29.2 cm–69.9 cm)

11.5 in.–27.5 in.
(29.2 cm–69.9 cm)
8518383
Weight:

30.75 lbs. (13.9 kg)
8518384
Weight:

43.2 lbs. (19.6 kg)
8518385
Weight:
40 lbs. (18.1 kg)
8518386
Weight:

43.5 lbs. (19.7 kg)
8518387
Weight:
50 lbs. (22.7 kg)
8518001
Weight:

27.1 lbs. (12.3 kg)
8518006
Weight:

31.1 lbs. (14.1 kg)
8518509
Weight:

14.15 lbs.(6.4 kg)
8518002
Weight:

17.6 lbs. (8 kg)
8518003
Weight:

19.75 lbs. (9 kg)
8518004
Weight:

24.15 lbs. (11 kg)
Davit Arm -
Adjustable Offset Upper Davit Masts Lower Davit Mast Extensions 33 in.–43 in. (83.8 cm–109.2 cm)

11.5 in.–27.5 in.
(29.2 cm–69.9 cm)
21 in.
(53.3 cm)
33 in.
(83.8 cm)
45 in.
(114.3 cm)
57 in.
(144.8 cm)

36.5 in.–54.5 in. (92.7 cm–138.4 cm)

23.5 in.–42.5 in.
(59.7 cm–108 cm) 78 in.–88 in. (198.1 cm–223.5 cm)
90 in.–100 in. (228.6 cm–254 cm)

69.5 in.–87.5 in. (176.5 cm–222.2 cm)

23.5 in.–42.5 in.
(59.7 cm–108 cm)

81.5 in.–99.5 in. (207 cm–252.7 cm)

93.5 in.–111.5 in. (237.5 cm–283.2 cm)
(Includes winch mount bracket)
Combine these adjustable offset upper davit masts
with up to two lower mast extensions to increase the
davit height. Consult the compatibility charts.

NOTE: Please reference compatibility chart on pages 24–25 for approved configurations, or visit go.3M.com/ConfinedSpaceCompatibilityChart for an updated list.

A
Anchors I Vertical Entry Solutions
I 31
3M™ DBI-SALA® Sealed-Blok™ vs 3M™ DBI-SALA® Ultra-Lok™
Maximum
Capacity
Maximum
Lifeline Length
Lifeline Type
RSQ Available
Technora® rope Galvanized Stainless steel
Sealed-Blok™ 420 lbs. (190.5 kg) 175 ft. (53.3 m) ■ ■ ■ ■ Ultra-Lok™ 310 lbs. (140.6 kg) 50 ft. (15.2 m) ■ ■
Retrieval SRLs
Model #
3401025
Mounting Bracket for Sealed-Blok™ Retrieval SRL
Fits all sizes of Sealed-Blok™ Retrieval SRL.

Accessories
Cable Type SealedBlok™
SealedBlok™
Without
Bracket
SealedBlok™/ RSQ
Without
Bracket
Ultra-Lok™ 30 ft.
(9.1 m)
50 ft.
(15.2 m)
55 ft.
(16.8 m)
85 ft.
(25.9 m)
130 ft.
(39.6 m)
175 ft.
(52.5m)
Galvanized steel
■ 3400853 3400923 3400871 3400976
■ 3400850 3400920 3400870 3400975 3400660
■ 3400940 3400910 3401002
■ 3501102
Stainless steel
■ 3400858 3400926 3400882 3400987
■ 3400852 3400922 3400874 3400979 3400661
■ 3400942 3400912 3401004
■ 3501103
Technora® rope ■ 3400840 3400843
Retrieval
Ultra-Lok™
SRL
Retrieval
Sealed-Blok™
SRL
Retrieval
Sealed-Blok™

SRL - RSQ
3401025
3M™ DBI-SALA® Sealed-Blok™
Self-Retracting Lifelines with
Retrieval incorporate a concept that
separates all dynamic components,
including the motor spring and
break, from foreign elements
such as grease, moisture and dirt.

Constructed from heavy-duty,
corrosion-resistant materials, the
sealed design meets IP69K rating.
• Available with RSQ Dual-Mode
Design—allows users to select
either standard fall arrest mode
or automatic descent mode.
• Available lengths ranging from
30 ft (9.1m) to 175 ft (53.3m).
• IP69K Sealed Rating.
3M™ DBI-SALA®
Ultra‑Lok™ SelfRetracting Lifelines
with Retrieval are
rugged, yet extremely
lightweight and
superbly engineered
devices you can
count on for safety,
efficiency and comfort.
• Available in 50 ft
length.

Connectors I Winches I Retrieval SRLs
C
26 Help to make your structures safe and
accessible. Optional configurations
include welded or bolted, straight or
curved ladders, wood, concrete or steel
structures and a variety of rung clamp
sizes and styles. These systems are a
versatile and economical solution for
many applications.
1 Standard top bracket
Galvanized top bracket with mounting
hardware. For systems up to 499 ft.
(152 m) high, fits up to 1-1/8 in. (2.85 cm)
rung diameter and attaches to three rungs.

Includes built-in energy absorber.
2 Standard bottom bracket
Fits up to 1-1/8 in. (2.85 cm) rung diameter
and attaches to two rungs. Galvanized
bottom bracket includes built-in
tension indicator.
3 Cable guide
Non-metallic cable guide with mounting
hardware. For systems up to 199 ft.
(60.6 m), fits up to 1-1/8 in. (2.85 cm)
rung diameter. Recommend one every
25 ft. (7.6 m)
4 Cable lifeline
Galvanized cable, 3/8 in. (9.5 mm)
diameter, 1 x 7 type. Last three digits in
part number indicate length.

5 Lad-Saf X3 Detachable
Cable Sleeve
Climbing sleeve for better climbing
performance and fall protection.

Easy to climb
The Lad-Saf X3 Detachable Cable
Sleeve automatically follows the
climber during ascent or descent.

In the event of a fall, the sleeve
immediately locks onto the cable
and remains locked until the user
can regain their footing.

Tension indicator
Integrated tension-indicating bottom
bracket takes the guesswork out
of installation.

Customizable
Hundreds of different brackets, styles
and configurations to suit almost
any application.

Corrosion-resistant
construction
Galvanized and stainless steel
construction stands up to harsh
environments for added longevity.

Shock-absorbing design
Integrated shock-absorbing top
bracket reduces forces imposed
on ladder structure during a fall.

Protected from wear
Intermediate cable guides help
prevent cable wear against the ladder
while permitting the climber to
bypass without disconnecting.
3M™ DBI-SALA® Lad-Saf™ Flexible Cable Ladder
Safety Systems
5 4
3 2
1 3M™ DBI-SALA® 3M.com/FallProtection 800-328-6146 (Opt. 1) 27 A Vertical Systems
6100090
3M™ DBI-SALA® Lad-Saf™
Bottom Bracket
Standard galvanized bottom bracket
with mounting hardware. Fits up to
1-1/8 in. (2.85 cm) rung diameter,
attaches to two rungs, built-in
tensioning device.
6100400
Lad-Saf Cable Guide
Non-metallic cable guide with
mounting hardware. For systems
up to 199 ft. (60.6 m), fits up to
1-1/8 in. (2.85 cm) rung diameter. 3M
recommends one every 25 ft. (7.6 m)
6100515 Cable Guide (L-shaped) and
hardware for systems over
200 ft. (61 m)
Lad-Saf Cable Lifeline
Durable high strength steel
construction. Galvanized
construction stands up to harsh
environments for maintenance
free longevity.
6116280
Lad-Saf Top Bracket
Standard galvanized top bracket with
mounting hardware. For systems up
to 499 ft. (152 m) high, fits up to
1-1/8 in. (2.85 cm) rung diameter,
attaches to three rungs, built-in
energy absorber.
6116410 Standard Top Bracket and
hardware for systems over
500 ft. (152.4 m)
6160054
Lad-Saf X3 Detachable
Cable Sleeve
For use with 3/8 in. (9.5 mm)
diameter 1 x 7 or 7 x 19
solid core cable. Comes with
2000112 carabiner. Meets
OSHA and ANSI standards.
6160030
Lad-Saf X2 Detachable
Cable Sleeve
Sleeve with carabiner, dual
independent locking system,
fits 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) and 5/16 in.
(8 mm) diameter 1 x 7 or 7 x 19
solid core cable.
6110XXX 6152XXX 6130XXX 6154XXX
Diameter 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) Strand 1 x 7 1 x 7 7 x 19 7 x 19
Steel Galvanized Stainless Galvanized Stainless
Preformed Left, Regular Lay Left, Regular Lay Right, Regular Lay Right, Regular Lay Compliance ASTM A475 ASTM A368 RR-W-410 RR-W-410
Breaking strength 15,400 lbs. minimum 18,000 lbs. minimum 14,400 lbs. minimum 12,000 lbs. minimum Cable Lifeline general specifications and materials
Last three digits in part number indicate length.

Coming Soon:
3M™ DBI-SALA® Lad-Saf™
Flexible Cable Vertical
Safety System
Redesigned to streamline installation
with up to 72% fewer loose
components compared to current
generation. ANSI Z359.16 compliant.

System Kits
System Kits include 6116280
Top Bracket, 610090 Bottom
Bracket, 3/8 in. 1 x 7 galvanized
cable with designated length and
cable guides where required.
6100897 17 ft. Lad-Saf System Kit
6100898 20 ft. Lad-Saf System Kit
6100877 30 ft. Lad-Saf System Kit
6100909 45 ft. Lad-Saf System Kit
6100876 100 ft. Lad-Saf System Kit
3M™ DBI-SALA® 3M.com/FallProtection 800-328-6146 (Opt. 1) 29 A Vertical Systems
Ladder Accessories
Steel Pole Ladder Safety System
Angle iron, clamp-on,
and steel pole weld-on
systems also available.

Call us today.
6116261
Top Bracket for Steel Pole
Bolt-on for monopole towers.
6116250
Top Bracket for Steel Pole
Weld-on for monopole towers.
6116336
Grab Bar Extension
Slides into Top Bracket (6116054)
of fixed ladder safety system
and provides the user with a
tie off point (for lanyard) when
connecting or disconnecting
from the system’s lifeline.
6116054
Top Bracket Assembly
For use with 6116336 (replaces
standard 6116280 Top Bracket).
6116026
Ladder Anchor Post
Galvanized removable
extension with eye-bolt
anchor to attach 3-way SRL.
6116027
Galvanized Bottom
Mounting Bracket
Attaches 6116026
to ladder.
5901980
Ladder Gate
Designed to help protect
you from the dangers (and
liability) of unauthorized
ladder access.

Fits ladder widths up to
20 in. (50.8 cm). Mounting
hardware included.

Aluminum construction
8 ft. (2.4 m) height x 36 in.
(91.4 cm) width.
30 5
6 4
3 2
1 The Rigid Rail System consists
of top and bottom entry/exit
gates, rail joints and multiple
mounting bracket options
designed to mount the rigid
aluminum rail to the structure.

You can configure to an existing
ladder or customize a system
with integrated ladder pegs
when no ladder exists. Various
clamps are available to attach
to almost any structure.

Shock-absorbing design
Integrated energy absorber
reduces forces imposed on
system and worker.

Easy to climb
Automatically follows the user
and locks in the event of a fall.

Ladder rung clamps
A variety of rung clamps
designed for installation at
multiple anchor points along
the system length.

Customizable
Different clamps and
configurations available.

Corrosion-resistant
construction
Stands up to harsh environments
for added longevity.
1 6000352
Top Ladder Rail Gate
Allows user to easily attach shuttle
to the system and helps prevent
accidental removal from the system.
2 6000120
Ladder Rung Clamp
Attaches rail to ladder structure. Use
within 1 ft. (0.3 cm) of rail splice and
one at least every 5 ft. (1.5 m)
3 6000033
Standard Rail
Anodized extruded aluminum rail
x 6.56 ft. (2 m)
6000031 3.25 ft. (1 m) Rail Section
6000032 9.84 ft. (3 m) Rail Section
4 6000100
Rail Joint
Attaches two rail sections together.
5 6000377
Shuttle
Climbing shuttle automatically
follows user and locks onto rail
during a fall.
6 6000375
Bottom Standard
Rail Gate
Allows user to easily attach shuttle
to the system and helps prevent
accidental removal from the system.
3M™ DBI-SALA® Rigid Rail Ladder Safety Systems
Standard Ladder
Water Distribution System Condition and Risk
Assessment
Appendix F
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 19, 2024 Project No.: 268-60-22-20
SENT VIA: EMAIL
TO: Mike Hether, PE
Assistant Public Works Director – Utilities
CC: George Shimboff
Stuart Hamilton
FROM: Anne Girtz, PE, RCE #91396
Austin Oerding
REVIEWED BY: Mike Zacharia, PE, RCE #43225
Amy Kwong, PE, RCE #73213
SUBJECT: Water Distribution System Condition and Risk Assessment

INTRODUCTION
The City of Fairfield (City) has retained West Yost to develop its 2023 Public Utility Master Plan (PUMP).

Task 6 for the PUMP describes a Water Distribution System Assessment (Assessment) to evaluate the condition of the City’s existing water distribution system and to make recommendations for improvements. The following is a summary of the Task 6 Assessment scope of services:
• Perform a desktop condition assessment of the water distribution system, including pipeline, valve, and service lateral assets.
• Develop an asset registry for the water distribution system, review background information, and perform workshops with City staff.
• Utilize the City’s existing risk framework to develop risk factors for each water distribution system asset type and assess risk for each asset.
• Based on the desktop condition and risk assessment results, develop a rehabilitation and replacement plan for pipelines, valves, and service laterals that can be incorporated into the Near-Term (2030) and Long-Term (2050) CIP.

This technical memorandum (TM) summarizes the methods, findings, and recommendations that comprise the Assessment effort, and is organized into the following sections:
• Asset Registry
• Condition Assessment
• Risk Assessment
• Rehabilitation and Replacement Plan
TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 2 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5

ASSET REGISTRY
In order to perform the condition and risk assessments, a comprehensive listing of the City’s water distribution system assets was required. The City provided GIS databases which included asset information such as location, size, type, material, and installation year. This information was used as the basis for the assessment.

Assets included in the assessment were:
 Pipelines ranging from 4-inches to 48-inches in diameter.  Valves greater than or equal to 24-inches in diameter, including both transmission main valves and facility valves. Facility valves are defined as valves associated with a pump station or reservoir facility and were identified by their location in the system and (e.g., valves that were not immediately adjacent to a transmission pipelines). Transmission valves are defined as valves attached to a distribution system pipeline greater than or equal to 24-inches and were identified by their adjacency to those pipelines.
 Service laterals greater than or equal to 3-inches in diameter (the City did not have location data for service laterals smaller than 3-inches in diameter) Table 1 presents a summary of the assets included in the final water distribution system asset registry.

Table 1. Water Distribution System Asset Registry – Count of Asset Types Asset Type Count
Pipelines 8,733 segments (391 miles)
Transmission Valves (≥24”) 300
Facility Valves (≥24”) 53
Service Laterals (≥3”) 3,746
Total 12,832

CONDITION ASSESSMENT
The desktop condition assessment was performed by using year of installation data provided by the City and an estimated useful life (EUL) to determine a remaining useful life (RUL) for each asset.

Asset EUL is the time that an asset provides valued service, after which it does not meet its intended service level. End of life is not necessarily indicative of catastrophic failure, and in most cases an asset can still hold functionality (but with a reduced level of service and/or reliability). Asset RUL can be estimated by comparing the actual age of assets (determined from installation date) to a standard useful life expectancy. In the absence of detailed condition or performance data, this approach provides an initial determination of assumed condition and can be used to project estimated renewal needs.

Standard useful life expectancies are documented by the American Water Works Association, Water Environment Research Foundation, in addition to other industry associations. EUL expectancies were developed for the distribution system assets using these industry standards and input from City staff. Each asset type within the water distribution system was assigned an estimated useful life, as presented in Table 2.

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 3 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Table 2. Estimated Useful Life Values
Asset Type Estimated Useful Life, years
Pipelines and Service Laterals (by Material)
Asbestos Cement Pipe (ACP) 90
CS 75
DIP 100
GALV 95
Pre-Stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe (PCCP) 75
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) 100
Steel 90
Steel/CPP (Reinforced Concrete Pressure Pipe) 100
Steel/AWWA 90
Copper 50
Transmission Valves 1/3 of Pipeline EUL
Facility Valves 20
RUL was calculated for each asset by subtracting the asset age (how long the asset has been installed) from its estimated useful life (EUL) – see Equation 1. Asset age was calculated based on the installation date and current year as 2023. For example, an asset with a 50-year estimated useful life that has been in service 35 years would have a RUL of 15 years. RUL can also be expressed in terms of percent RUL, that is, the percent of useful life that remains for the – see Equation 2.

Eqn. 1: RUL = EUL – age
Eqn. 2: Percent RUL = RUL / EUL
Desktop Assessment Analysis
Asset RUL results were grouped into four classes for data visualization purposes. Classes range from Class A, which includes newer assets in the first 25 percent of their useful life expectancy/assets that are expected to be in new or like new condition, to Class D, which includes assets in the last 25 percent of their useful life expectancy/assets that are expected to be in poorer condition. Table 3 presents the percent RUL categories, associated classification, and expected condition rating.

Note that this desktop analysis uses age and estimated useful life values to estimate an expected condition. In the absence of condition or performance data, this approach provides an initial determination of assumed condition but does not provide a conclusive picture of actual asset condition.

For pipe and valve assets, end of useful life is not necessarily indicative of catastrophic failure, and in most cases an asset can still hold functionality (potentially with a reduced level of service) when it has reached the end of its useful life.

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 4 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Table 3. RUL Categories
Percent RUL Class Expected Condition Rating
75-100 A Like New or New
50-75 B Good
25-50 C Fair
0-25 D Poor
Figures 1 through 3 present a graphical representation of RUL class for each asset type. This information provides a snapshot view of the condition of the City’s water distribution system assets and where future R&R may be required. In general, the City’s pipelines and service laterals are generally in good to fair condition based on the RUL estimation and classification. The City’s transmission and facility valves are mostly in poor condition due to their older age and relatively short useful life of valves (for transmission valves, a maximum 33-year EUL, based on pipeline EUL; and for facility valves, a 20-year EUL).

Figure 1. Pipeline RUL Class by Length (miles) and Percent of Total Pipeline Length

83.04 160.74
135.45

11.87 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
-
20 40
60 80
100
120
140
160
180
A B C D Relative Total, Percent Length, miles
RUL Class
TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 5 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Figure 2. Service Lateral RUL Class by Count and Percent of Service Laterals ≥ 3-inch Figure 3. Valve RUL Class by Count and Percent of Valves ≥ 24-inch

821
1431
1363
131
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
A B C D Relative Total, Percent Count
RUL Class
25 22
38 268
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
A B C D Relative Total, Percent Total Count
RUL Class
TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 6 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5

RISK ASSESSMENT
The risk assessment considers both likelihood of failure (LOF) ratings and consequence of failure (COF) ratings to quantify the risk associated with each asset. The risk assessment methodology and results presented in this section are consistent with the results presented in the Condition Assessment section above and with the City’s 2023 Pump Station Asset Management Plan. These results are used as the basis for prioritization of the Rehabilitation and Replacement Plan, described later in this TM. Rehabilitation and replacement project costs will be presented in Chapter 9 of the PUMP Report.

Key topics addressed in this section include:
 Risk Methods
 Pipeline Risk Results
 Service Lateral and Valve Risk Results
The general approach used in the risk assessment is illustrated in Figure 4 (pipelines) and Figure 5 (service laterals and valves).

For pipelines, ratings for LOF and COF are assigned for each individual pipeline. Pipeline risk is then calculated based on those asset LOF and COF scores. For valves and service laterals, a rating for LOF is assigned for each individual asset. The COF for valves and service laterals is inherited from the adjacent or connecting pipeline based on the assumption that the pipeline appurtenances have a similar consequence of failure as its associated pipeline. Valve or service lateral risk is then calculated based on the asset LOF score and adjacent/associated pipeline COF score.

Figure 4. Pipeline Risk Assessment Methodology
Figure 5. Service Lateral and Valve Risk Assessment Methodology

Pipeline Risk
Asset LOF Asset COF
Service Lateral / Valve Risk
Asset LOF Pipeline COF
TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 7 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Risk Methods
This section describes the methods used to perform the LOF and COF analyses and to determine the resulting risk level for individual pipeline, service lateral, and valve assets assessed for the PUMP.

Pipeline LOF
The asset LOF analysis considers the probability that a failure of a given asset will occur. The analysis considers LOF as two factors, Percent of Remaining Useful Life (Eq. 2 in the Condition Assessment section) and Percent Likelihood of Failure from the City’s Fracta model. Where percent RUL could not be calculated due to lack of data, only LoF from the Fracta model was used. Table 4 describes what each LOF factor takes into consideration.

Table 4. Criteria Used for Asset LOF Evaluation
Criteria/Factor Description
Percent of Remaining
Useful Life
This factor takes into account the fact that older assets are more likely to fail than newer ones due to the age of materials and wear from repeated use. The percent of remaining useful life was determined by comparing installation date to the industry standard useful life for each asset, as discussed in the Condition Assessment section of this TM. Percent RUL = (EUL-age)/EUL.

Percent Likelihood of
Failure (Fracta)
The City had previously undertaken a likelihood of failure analysis with Fracta, Inc., which uses machine learning to develop a condition and risk rating of drinking water distribution pipelines.

Fracta assigns a Likelihood of Failure (LoF) condition assessment score to every pipe segment based on various risk factors and break history using both City of Fairfield data as well as data available for pipelines with similar environment criteria across the world. After gathering the historical pipe break data, relevant environmental variables are factored into the algorithm such as soil, elevation, proximity to water, railroads and more.

Fracta’s Likelihood of Failure (LoF) is the condition assessment score given to each pipeline asset in the water distribution system. It can be interpreted as the percent chance of failure for a pipe. The LoF percentage is the LoF for the next 12 months.

The LOF factors above are translated into numeric rankings of 1 to 10, with 10 indicating the highest LOF.

The Percent of Remaining Useful Life factor governed for 96 percent of the pipelines – this is due to the very low probability of failure within the next 12 months predicted through the Fracta model.

An overall LOF score is determined by taking the maximum value of the two ratings, so each asset will have an overall LOF score of between 1 and 10. The factors and their range of potential ratings for each category are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. Distribution System Asset LOF Rating Factors
Criteria/Factor
Rating
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Percent of
Remaining
Useful Life
100-70 71-63 62-55 54-47 46-39 38-31 30-23 22-15 14-8 7-0 Fracta Percent
Likelihood of
Failure
<50 51-60 61-70 71-78 79-85 86-90 91-93 94-96 97-99 >99 TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 8 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Service Lateral and Valve LOF
Fracta data was not available for service laterals and valves, so the LOF for these assets was evaluated solely based on percent of remaining useful life.

Asset COF
The COF analysis considers the impact that an asset failure may have on the water system as a whole, the City, and the surrounding community. As described previously, the COF was evaluated for the pipelines; then all service laterals and valves connecting or adjacent to that pipeline inherit that same COF score.

This approach assumes that the pipeline appurtenances have a similar consequence of failure as its associated pipeline. The criteria considered in determining the COF are presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Criteria Used for Asset COF Evaluation
Category Criteria/Factor Description
Operating
Ability Ability to Maintain Service
Operating ability considers the effect on the water system and the customers if the pipeline fails. Failure will have a varying degree of impact on the ability of the system to deliver water depending on the size and location of the asset.

Larger pipelines or pipelines with existing capacity deficiencies indicate a larger potential consequence.

Difficulty to
Repair
Street Type / Difficult
Area Identified by City
The time and/or resources required to repair or replace an asset depend on the location and accessibility of the asset. An easy repair or replacement is defined as being located on a local street with little vehicle and foot traffic and little disruption to the public. A difficult repair or replacement would be located on a highway, on-ramp, railway crossing, or area otherwise identified as challenging by the City.

The COF factors shown in Table 6 were translated into numeric rankings of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating the highest or worst consequence. Each pipeline was evaluated for the two factors, then added together, with a resultant overall COF score between 2 and 10 using the following formula:

Overall COF = Operating Ability (COF1) + Difficulty to Repair (COF2) This pipeline COF is assigned to all service laterals and valves adjacent to that pipeline. The factors and their range of potential ratings for each category are presented in Table 7.

Table 7. Distribution System Asset COF Rating Factors
Consequence Factor
Rating (1 being the lowest, 5 being the highest)
1 2 3 4 5
Operating
Ability
Ability to
Maintain
Service
Distribution
Mains
(<12-inch)
Distribution
Mains
(≥12-inch)
--
Transmission
Mains (≥24inch)
Cannot meet
fire flow
requirement(a)
Difficulty to
Repair
Street Type /
Difficult Area
Identified by
City
Local Collector Arterial
Highway,
Freeway, ramp,
railway crossing
Other difficult to
access, identified
by City(b)
(a) There were no existing fire flow deficiencies identified during this assessment; however, the criterion is left in place as a metric to be used in future evaluations.
(b) City provided a list of approximately 50 locations, by pipeline, that were considered areas that required complex repairs.

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 9 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Risk Score Calculation
Upon determining all the asset LOF and COF scores, a risk score is calculated for each pipeline, service lateral, and valve using the following formula:

Risk Score = Asset LOF Score x Asset COF Score
Risk Results
By plotting the LOF and COF scores of each asset against each other, an overall risk level was assigned to each asset. Risk levels are prioritized into five risk levels: Low, Medium-Low, Medium, Medium-High, and High, each of which is color-coded in Table 8. These risk levels are assigned to the various cells using best engineering judgment to determine which combinations of scores warrant the highest levels of concern versus those that warrant lesser levels of concern. This risk matrix is in alignment with the matrix developed in the City’s 2023 Pump Station Asset Management Plan and was also used for other asset type assessments within the PUMP.

Table 8. PUMP Risk Matrix
COF Score
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LOF Score
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Risk Levels Low Medium-Low Medium Medium-High High

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 10 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Pipeline Risk Results
The pipeline risk assessment results are summarized in Table 9, which lists the total length and percentage of pipelines that fall in each risk level. The majority of the pipelines (84 percent) fall into the Low or Medium-Low risk levels. The pipeline risk levels are presented spatially on Figure 6.

Table 9. Pipeline Risk Level Results Summary
Risk Level Length of Pipelines, feet Length of Pipelines, miles Percent of Total Low 940,745 178.2 45.6
Medium-Low 788,872 149.4 38.2
Medium 304,161 57.6 14.7
Medium-High 31,289 5.9 1.5
High 0 0 0
Total 2,065,068 391.1 100%
Service Lateral Risk Results
The service lateral risk assessment results are summarized in Table 10, which lists the service laterals (greater than or equal to 3-inches diameter) and percentage of the total that falls in each risk level. The majority of the service laterals (85 percent) fall into the Low or Medium-Low risk levels.

Table 10. Service Laterals (≥ 3-inch) Risk Level Results Summary Risk Level Count of Service Laterals Percent of Total
Low 1,810 48.3
Medium-Low 1,377 36.8
Medium 546 14.6
Medium-High 13 0.3
High 0 0
Total 3,746 100%
Valve Risk Results
The valve risk assessment results are summarized in Table 11, which lists the number of valves (greater than 24-inch diameter) and percentage of the total that falls in each risk level. The majority of the valves (77 percent) fall into the Medium-High or High-risk levels.

Table 11. Valve (>24-inch) Risk Level Results Summary
Risk Level Number of Assets Percent of Total
Low 25 7.1
Medium-Low 18 5.1
Medium 40 11.3
Medium-High 157 44.5
High 113 32
Total 353 100%

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 12 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5

REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT (R&R) PLAN DEVELOPMENT
A rehabilitation and replacement (R&R) plan was developed based on the condition and risk assessment results presented above. The condition assessment results were used to identify assets that are likely in poor condition and may be in need of rehabilitation or replacement. The risk assessment results were used to prioritize these assets within the framework of the Near-Term and Long-Term planning timeframes.

Each of the asset types, and how they were incorporated into the R&R plan, is discussed below.

Pipelines
 The oldest pipelines have a RUL of 19 years (i.e., are not expected to require replacement for 19 years, in year 2042)
 No pipelines were assessed to be High risk. 5.9 miles (51 segments) of pipeline were assessed to be Medium-High Risk (1.5% of total pipeline length) Service Laterals (≥3-inch)
 The oldest service laterals have a RUL of 19 years (i.e., are not expected to require replacement for 19 years, in year 2042)
 No service laterals were assessed to be High risk. Thirteen service laterals were assessed to be Medium-High Risk
The City’s pipelines and ≥3-inch service laterals are relatively new and hold a relatively low risk, with the lowest RUL at 19 years. For these reasons, replacements for pipelines and ≥3-inch service laterals are not recommended within the Near-Term (2030) timeframe. Starting in 2042, through the end of the Long-Term timeframe (2050), 20.1 miles of replacement are expected due to assets reaching end of EUL.

These 2042-2050 replacements should be prioritized by risk. in general, service laterals should be replaced when their adjacent pipeline is replaced.

The City provided anecdotal information that the service laterals (of all sizes) in certain “Priority Areas” of the City should be prioritized for replacement. Because service lateral information was not available spatially, meters were used to estimate the number of service laterals (all sizes) within the Priority Areas.

These service lateral replacements were distributed within the Near-Term timeframe (over 6 years, from 2025 to 2030). Note that only service laterals ≥3-inch were included in the condition and risk assessment sections of this TM, but the R&R will include recommendations for all size service laterals. The extents of the four Priority Areas were provided by the City and shown in Figure 7.

The City has been proactively replacing small diameter pipelines (≤6-inch) throughout their system in areas where these pipelines present capacity issues (e.g., courts with no hydrants). Based on the City’s current GIS, there are 9,075 feet of 4-inch pipeline and 135,528 feet of 6-inch pipeline remaining in the system. The City expects there is actually less than 1,000 feet of remaining 4-inch pipeline and acknowledged that the GIS is out of date. As of March 2024, the City was still in the process of updating their GIS to reflect pipeline upgrades. It was agreed that small diameter pipelines would only be recommended for replacement if they present a hydraulic deficiency. The City will continue to update their GIS to reflect recent upgrades and for consistency with the hydraulic model.

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 14 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Valves
 252 valves have a RUL of less than or equal to 0 (in year 2025)  113 valves were assessed to be High risk. 157 valves were assessed to be Medium-High Risk The City’s valves are relatively old and higher risk due to primarily to the relatively short useful life of valves (20 to 33 years). Most valves have not been replaced since their adjacent pipeline was installed.

The City repairs or replaces valves reactively but has expressed interest in developing a system-wide valve replacement program. It is recommended all valves with zero RUL (252 valves) are included in replacement budgets within the next 5 years. These 252 valves were prioritized based on input from the City and the risk results. A list of priority valves was provided March 2024 by the City and were selected based on: major crossings (freeways); influent/effluent pump stations; effluent transmission mains from treatment plant; creek/canal crossings; source water flexibility and redundancy; single feed lines. These valve replacements can also be grouped by proximity for construction efficiencies.

Other valves that reach the end of their EUL in the planning timeframes should be budgeted for in the year they reach zero RUL.

Recommended R&R Plan
The R&R plan presented below is a forecast of expected improvements based on the age and expected condition of assets. The exact intervention (i.e., rehabilitation or replacement) and timing should be confirmed through condition assessment studies and/or validation with field and maintenance records.

Until the R&R plan is validated, the forecast should primarily be used for system-wide planning and budgeting (e.g., to estimate dollars per year budgeted for water system R&R). The R&R plan should be reviewed and updated annually, or as new condition or performance data becomes available; this approach should provide the City adequate funding for R&R throughout the Long-Term planning timeframe.

A summary of the proposed R&R plan is presented in Table 12 and Figure 7. Asset listings for each year of the plan are provided in Appendices A-1 (valves) and A-2 (pipelines and service laterals).

TM – City of Fairfield
March 19, 2024

Page 15 ends

N-C-268-60-22-20-WP-TM5
Table 12. Proposed Water Distribution System R&R Plan
Year Description of Replacement
Length
of
Pipeline
Count of
Service
Laterals Count of Valves
2025
 All service laterals (all sizes) in Priority Area 2.
 Valves already beyond their EUL in Year 2025 and
identified as Priority Valves by the City.
- 208(a)
69 (4 Facility
and 65
Transmission)
2026
 All service laterals (all sizes) in Priority Area 4.
 Valves already beyond their EUL in Year 2025 and
with a High Risk Level
- 769(a)
77 (2 Facility
and 75
Transmission)
2027
 Half of service laterals (all sizes) in Priority Area 3.  Valves already beyond their EUL in Year 2025 and
with a Medium-High Risk Level
- 562(a)
106 ((47 Facility
and 59
Transmission)
2028
 Half of service laterals (all sizes) in Priority Area 3.  Valves with zero RUL in Year 2028 - 562(a) 16 Transmission 2029  Half of service laterals (all sizes) in Priority Area 1. - 718(a) - 2030
(End of
Near-Term)
 Half of service laterals (all sizes) in Priority Area 1. - 719(a) - 2031 - - - -
2032  Valves with zero RUL in Year 2032 - - 1 Transmission 2033 - - - -
2034  Valves with zero RUL in Year 2034 - - 5 Transmission 2035  Valves with zero RUL in Year 2035 - - 15 Transmission 2036-2050
(Long-Term)
 Pipelines and service laterals (≥3”) reaching their
EUL from Year 2036 to 2050 (starts in 2042).
 Valves reaching zero RUL from Year 2036 to 2050
106,332
ft (490
pipes)
257 51 Transmission
(a) Service lateral counts include service laterals of all sizes in Priority Areas shown on Figure 7. Service laterals smaller than 3-inch were not available spatially, so the number of these service laterals was estimated using the number of meters in each Priority Area.

Proposed Valve R&R

Appendix A-1
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
WGV-13054 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-13651 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-13158 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10508 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-15043 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-15078 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10324 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10297 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10325 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10496 30 Transmission 2025
WGV-15020 30 Transmission 2025
WGV-14633 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10371 30 Transmission 2025
WGV-15019 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10331 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10332 30 Transmission 2025
WGV-12614 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10373 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10652 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-13107 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10391 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-13397 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10615 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-12572 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10494 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10406 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10651 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10242 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-15060 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10240 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-13286 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10377 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-13493 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10281 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10392 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10521 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10416 30 Transmission 2025
WBV-10491 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-12305 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-14049 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-14047 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10611 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-13027 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-13325 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10436 36 Transmission 2025
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WBV-10492 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10437 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10467 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10490 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10357 36 Transmission 2025
WMOV-10006 30 Transmission 2025
WGV-15004 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10554 36 Transmission 2025
WBV-10540 36 Transmission 2025
WGV-15017 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-15018 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-14040 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10442 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10054 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10409 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10412 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10408 24 Transmission 2025
WBV-10410 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-13407 24 Transmission 2025
WGV-13287 24 Transmission 2025
WMOV-10022 36 Facility 2025
WMOV-10011 30 Facility 2025
WMOV-10010 24 Facility 2025
WMOV-10021 30 Facility 2025
WBV-10495 30 Transmission 2026
WBL-10647 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-12969 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-15013 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-15003 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-13032 30 Transmission 2026
WBL-10768 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-15014 30 Transmission 2026
WBV-10657 30 Transmission 2026
WARV-10289 30 Transmission 2026
WARV-10219 30 Transmission 2026
WARV-10283 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-14438 30 Transmission 2026
WBL-10814 30 Transmission 2026
WBL-10765 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-14437 30 Transmission 2026
WBV-10369 30 Transmission 2026
WBV-10656 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-15010 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-15011 30 Transmission 2026
WGV-15059 30 Transmission 2026
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WARV-10291 30 Transmission 2026
WBL-10764 30 Transmission 2026
WBV-10658 30 Transmission 2026
WBV-10372 30 Transmission 2026
WBV-10211 24 Transmission 2026
WARV-10094 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-14907 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-15157 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10682 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-14649 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10489 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10045 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-14653 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-19157 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10253 24 Transmission 2026
WBL-10369 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-13649 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-10138 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-12714 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-12159 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10153 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-12160 24 Transmission 2026
WGV-14439 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-11396 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-14440 36 Transmission 2026
WBV-10370 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-13152 36 Transmission 2026
WBK-10026 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-12823 36 Transmission 2026
WBL-10766 36 Transmission 2026
WBYV-10002 36 Transmission 2026
WBV-10260 36 Transmission 2026
WBL-10080 36 Transmission 2026
WBL-10532 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-13388 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10375 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-11578 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-12673 36 Transmission 2026
WBV-10108 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10343 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10217 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-11547 36 Transmission 2026
WBL-10773 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-12759 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10243 24 Transmission 2026
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WBK-10044 24 Transmission 2026
WBL-10662 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-11779 36 Transmission 2026
WGV-13255 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10407 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10278 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10279 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10329 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10327 24 Transmission 2026
WBV-10666 24 Facility 2026
WCHV-10050 24 Facility 2026
WGV-15162 30 Transmission 2027
WBV-10462 30 Transmission 2027
WARV-10265 30 Transmission 2027
WBV-10307 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-15241 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-13511 24 Transmission 2027
WARV-10002 30 Transmission 2027
WARV-10004 30 Transmission 2027
WBL-10813 30 Transmission 2027
WGV-15012 30 Transmission 2027
WBL-10299 30 Transmission 2027
WBV-10084 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-12314 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-10825 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10681 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-13396 36 Transmission 2027
WARV-10121 36 Transmission 2027
WBV-10487 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-12007 24 Transmission 2027
WARV-10297 36 Transmission 2027
WBL-10823 36 Transmission 2027
WGV-11165 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10488 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-13104 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-15242 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10156 36 Transmission 2027
WGV-13108 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10650 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-11164 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-14606 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-13103 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-14654 36 Transmission 2027
WGV-10114 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-12142 36 Transmission 2027
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WGV-10631 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10043 36 Transmission 2027
WBV-10486 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-12132 36 Transmission 2027
WARV-10293 36 Transmission 2027
WARV-10296 36 Transmission 2027
WMTV-10010 48 Transmission 2027
WMTV-10011 30 Transmission 2027
WARV-10298 36 Transmission 2027
WGV-15009 36 Transmission 2027
WARV-10008 36 Transmission 2027
WBL-10824 36 Transmission 2027
WGV-11381 24 Transmission 2027
WCV-10010 36 Transmission 2027
WBYV-10001 30 Transmission 2027
WBV-10028 36 Transmission 2027
WGV-14811 30 Transmission 2027
WBV-10029 36 Transmission 2027
WBV-10031 36 Transmission 2027
WBL-10972 36 Transmission 2027
WBV-10032 36 Transmission 2027
WBV-10258 36 Transmission 2027
WBV-10255 24 Transmission 2027
WGV-12250 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10335 24 Transmission 2027
WBV-10667 24 Facility 2027
WCHV-10041 36 Facility 2027
WCHV-10039 36 Facility 2027
WMOV-10028 24 Facility 2027
WMTV-10003 36 Facility 2027
WCHV-10040 36 Facility 2027
WCHV-10051 24 Facility 2027
WCHV-10038 36 Facility 2027
WBV-10466 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10464 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10463 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10465 30 Facility 2027
WBL-10921 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10617 24 Facility 2027
WBV-10618 24 Facility 2027
WBV-10622 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10619 24 Facility 2027
WBV-10621 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10628 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10620 30 Facility 2027
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WCHV-10035 30 Facility 2027
WMTV-10002 30 Facility 2027
WCHV-10033 24 Facility 2027
WCHV-10037 24 Facility 2027
WCHV-10032 30 Facility 2027
WMOV-10007 30 Facility 2027
WMOV-10008 24 Facility 2027
WCHV-10034 30 Facility 2027
WCHV-10036 24 Facility 2027
WBV-10612 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10613 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10470 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10478 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10614 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10477 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10480 42 Facility 2027
WBV-10679 36 Facility 2027
WBV-10471 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10469 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10472 30 Facility 2027
WMTV-10014 24 Facility 2027
WMTV-10009 48 Facility 2027
WMOV-10013 30 Facility 2027
WCV-10019 24 Facility 2027
WMOV-10012 48 Facility 2027
WMTV-10001 30 Facility 2027
WCHV-10031 30 Facility 2027
WBV-10481 30 Transmission 2028
WBV-10338 30 Transmission 2028
WBV-10483 30 Transmission 2028
WBV-10514 30 Transmission 2028
WBV-10513 30 Transmission 2028
WBV-10339 24 Transmission 2028
WBV-10461 30 Transmission 2028
WMOV-10003 24 Transmission 2028
WBV-10482 30 Transmission 2028
WARV-10342 24 Transmission 2028
WBV-10542 24 Transmission 2028
WBV-10363 24 Transmission 2028
WBV-10178 24 Transmission 2028
WCHV-10019 24 Transmission 2028
WCHV-10012 24 Transmission 2028
WMOV-10017 24 Transmission 2028
WBV-10684 30 Transmission 2032
WMOV-10014 30 Transmission 2034
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WCHV-10018 30 Transmission 2034
WCHV-10056 30 Transmission 2034
WCHV-10057 30 Transmission 2034
WMOV-10015 30 Transmission 2034
WBV-10629 36 Transmission 2035
WBV-10631 36 Transmission 2035
WBV-10630 36 Transmission 2035
WBL-10953 42 Transmission 2035
WSV-10001 36 Transmission 2035
WARV-10410 42 Transmission 2035
WBV-10623 36 Transmission 2035
WBV-10476 36 Transmission 2035
WBL-10954 42 Transmission 2035
WSV-10002 36 Transmission 2035
WSV-10000 36 Transmission 2035
WBL-10955 42 Transmission 2035
WBV-10624 36 Transmission 2035
WBV-10475 36 Transmission 2035
WMOV-10026 42 Transmission 2035
WBV-10637 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10638 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10636 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMOV-10023 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10553 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10552 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10541 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10579 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10551 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10438 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10555 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10359 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10358 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10434 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMOV-10002 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMOV-10004 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10430 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10420 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10421 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10511 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10509 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10510 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10403 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10640 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10648 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10396 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
ID Diameter, inch Type CIP Year
A-1. Proposed Valve R&R
WBV-10400 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10635 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMOV-10024 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMTV-10004 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10593 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10590 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10457 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WARV-10393 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WCHV-10011 24 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WARV-10271 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10429 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10419 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10428 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10683 30 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10399 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WGV-10744 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WARV-10258 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10397 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10445 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WARV-10412 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WARV-10411 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10446 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WBV-10387 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMOV-10020 36 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
WMTV-10006 42 Transmission Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Appendix A-2
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral No ID (Count = 208) Varies - 2025
Lateral No ID (Count = 769) Varies - 2026
Lateral No ID (Count = 562) Varies - 2027
Lateral No ID (Count = 562) Varies - 2028
Lateral No ID (Count = 718) Varies - 2029
Lateral No ID (Count = 719) Varies - 2030
Pipeline W-12525 8 91 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12526 8 278 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12527 8 355 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12528 8 101 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12643 8 54 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12644 8 397 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12647 8 196 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12648 8 50 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12672 8 537 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13532 8 271 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13534 8 611 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13535 8 35 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13729 8 317 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-14123 8 271 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-14124 8 50 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10332 8 29 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10333 8 701 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10617 8 218 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10618 8 37 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10917 8 294 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10918 8 69 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10919 8 40 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11797 8 34 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11798 8 596 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11799 8 555 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11800 8 111 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11804 8 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11805 8 594 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11806 8 587 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11875 8 332 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11876 8 505 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11877 8 420 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11878 8 61 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11879 8 235 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11880 8 558 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-11885 8 672 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11886 8 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11887 8 172 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11888 8 556 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11900 8 207 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11901 8 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11925 8 272 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11926 8 43 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11928 8 66 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11929 8 52 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11937 8 412 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12108 8 32 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12109 8 325 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12110 8 351 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12111 8 28 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12125 8 383 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12551 8 50 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13015 8 280 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13193 8 236 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13254 8 40 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13255 8 535 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13256 8 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13290 8 415 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13325 8 200 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13328 8 36 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13329 8 786 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13330 8 222 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13331 8 249 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13799 8 37 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13800 8 578 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13801 8 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16569 8 268 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16570 8 612 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16571 8 404 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16573 8 35 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16574 8 659 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16575 8 39 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10330 8 60 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10331 8 448 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12309 8 54 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12310 8 490 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-12458 8 487 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12459 8 59 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12555 8 64 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12556 8 620 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13137 8 218 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13145 8 60 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13146 8 650 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13182 8 196 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13183 8 55 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13205 8 276 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13206 8 54 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13240 8 580 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13241 8 503 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13242 8 362 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10290 8 225 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12496 8 181 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12497 8 62 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10742 8 127 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10743 8 459 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10744 8 231 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10745 8 270 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10746 8 121 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12428 8 37 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12429 8 418 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12430 8 410 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12431 8 27 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12517 8 444 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12518 8 54 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-15177 8 613 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-15178 8 361 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17609 8 18 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12199 8 356 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12200 8 376 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12201 8 192 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12256 8 198 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12257 8 66 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10283 8 437 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10284 8 405 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10285 8 34 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10649 8 43 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10650 8 361 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-10728 8 1,182 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10729 8 318 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10733 8 67 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10734 8 464 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10735 8 74 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10740 8 191 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10741 8 44 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11173 8 189 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11174 8 138 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11175 8 57 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11176 8 32 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11185 8 22 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11192 8 605 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11193 8 315 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11194 8 74 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11201 8 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11202 8 197 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11902 8 48 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11903 8 294 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11904 8 24 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11946 8 416 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11981 8 59 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11982 8 328 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12113 8 1 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12120 8 199 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12121 8 189 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12130 8 389 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12131 8 379 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12132 8 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12133 8 387 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12134 8 45 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12135 8 384 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12163 8 25 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12164 8 295 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12165 8 39 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12166 8 383 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12167 8 26 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12168 8 214 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12169 8 218 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12170 8 404 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12171 8 44 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-12172 8 286 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12173 8 71 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12174 8 355 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12175 8 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12176 8 344 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12177 8 12 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12178 8 26 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12181 8 220 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12182 8 167 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12183 8 366 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12185 8 16 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12186 8 333 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12187 8 24 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12188 8 21 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12189 8 30 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12190 8 353 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12191 8 207 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12192 8 219 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12193 8 46 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12194 8 270 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12195 8 71 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12208 8 179 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12209 8 225 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12211 8 362 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12215 8 62 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12216 8 287 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12217 8 54 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12218 8 399 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12219 8 392 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12224 8 70 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12226 8 381 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12227 8 55 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12228 8 348 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12229 8 381 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12234 8 408 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12235 8 379 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12236 8 331 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12237 8 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12293 8 42 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12294 8 299 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12295 8 528 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-12296 8 60 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12297 8 196 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12298 8 245 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12299 8 223 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12300 8 32 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12301 8 244 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12319 8 258 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12324 8 334 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12325 8 188 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12326 8 137 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12327 8 283 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12328 8 413 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12332 8 219 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12333 8 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12393 8 215 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12394 8 363 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12395 8 352 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12396 8 399 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12513 8 284 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12516 8 7 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12984 8 351 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-15983 8 456 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16190 8 25 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16191 8 151 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16192 8 175 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16193 8 39 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16194 8 185 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16195 8 192 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16375 8 69 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16567 8 148 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16579 8 189 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16794 8 312 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12225 8 149 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12243 8 2 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-18046 8 186 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10281 8 284 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10747 8 32 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10748 8 285 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11197 8 52 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11198 8 202 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11199 8 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-11200 8 198 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11996 8 792 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12019 8 35 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12020 8 221 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12021 8 334 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12022 8 277 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12023 8 237 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12024 8 35 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12463 8 367 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12464 8 76 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12519 8 40 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12520 8 213 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12521 8 46 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12522 8 226 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12450 8 452 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12451 8 70 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12977 8 40 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12978 8 286 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12979 8 157 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12980 8 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12981 8 209 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12831 10 56 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12832 10 245 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13034 10 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13035 10 82 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13047 10 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13048 10 178 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13083 10 55 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13084 10 298 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13411 10 263 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13412 10 198 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13413 10 195 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13414 10 472 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13727 10 57 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13728 10 498 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13825 10 311 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13894 10 34 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11392 10 67 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11393 10 248 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11394 10 36 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11439 10 302 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-11440 10 452 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11441 10 70 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11807 10 269 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12541 10 246 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13014 10 238 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13039 10 217 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13040 10 45 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13257 10 251 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13258 10 208 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13297 10 277 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13355 10 434 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13356 10 359 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13396 10 407 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13397 10 36 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13398 10 250 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13399 10 40 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13400 10 255 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13401 10 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13405 10 406 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13406 10 54 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13410 10 22 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17130 10 19 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17608 10 24 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13135 10 201 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13136 10 357 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10287 10 227 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12027 10 184 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12028 10 58 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12408 10 67 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12409 10 180 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12492 10 187 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12493 10 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12246 10 256 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10736 10 337 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10737 10 288 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10738 10 316 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10739 10 85 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11186 10 43 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12180 10 62 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12356 10 65 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12375 10 31 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-12376 10 193 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12402 10 214 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12403 10 50 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12179 10 188 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-18044 10 154 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10297 10 135 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11187 10 152 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11188 10 56 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11195 10 195 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11196 10 58 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11997 10 478 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12342 10 65 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12343 10 612 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12344 10 36 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12357 10 264 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12358 10 41 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12359 10 203 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12442 10 230 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12443 10 86 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12444 10 383 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12445 10 206 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12446 10 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12465 10 313 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12466 10 53 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12489 10 196 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12490 10 33 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12515 10 363 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17603 10 100 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10298 12 448 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10299 12 292 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10300 12 103 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10301 12 99 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10302 12 226 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11217 12 181 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11222 12 349 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11226 12 29 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11227 12 270 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11228 12 60 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11232 12 362 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11238 12 364 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11240 12 76 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-11241 12 252 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11739 12 285 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11740 12 426 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12524 12 253 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12532 12 242 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12536 12 134 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12537 12 121 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12538 12 201 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12539 12 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12540 12 238 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12809 12 296 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12810 12 51 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13850 12 304 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13851 12 411 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17562 12 210 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17563 12 68 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17564 12 25 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12987 12 482 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11086 12 330 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12821 12 319 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12822 12 359 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11216 12 278 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12759 12 66 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12760 12 379 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10901 12 465 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10902 12 38 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11960 12 323 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12406 12 327 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12755 12 244 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12756 12 56 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12757 12 16 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12758 12 175 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11990 12 210 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11991 12 52 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10543 12 56 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10544 12 269 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10545 12 43 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10549 12 58 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10550 12 361 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10551 12 51 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10631 12 44 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-10632 12 359 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10635 12 360 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10639 12 30 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10640 12 297 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10641 12 58 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10647 12 22 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10648 12 360 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11223 12 32 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11239 12 351 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11968 12 442 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12239 12 406 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12321 12 72 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12322 12 289 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12323 12 344 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12507 12 242 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12749 12 240 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17161 12 98 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17162 12 280 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17183 12 81 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12508 12 69 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-16048 12 255 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-18049 12 167 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-18072 12 614 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12015 12 80 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12016 12 463 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12017 12 320 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12503 12 51 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12504 12 219 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11841 12 379 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11842 12 310 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11843 12 8 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12137 12 722 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12138 12 858 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17184 12 269 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17185 12 10 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17186 12 18 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17187 12 244 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17188 12 95 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17189 12 324 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17190 12 268 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17191 12 439 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-17192 12 96 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17193 12 64 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17194 12 229 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17195 12 69 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17196 12 192 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17197 12 35 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17198 12 180 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17199 12 66 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17200 12 245 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17201 12 132 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17202 12 230 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17203 12 47 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17204 12 16 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17205 12 391 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17206 12 51 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17207 12 36 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17577 12 10 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17578 12 26 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17579 12 39 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17580 12 138 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17584 12 14 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17585 12 62 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10453 16 26 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10454 16 249 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13895 16 427 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-13896 16 34 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10636 16 373 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-15997 16 205 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17568 16 203 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-19118 16 11 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10620 16 85 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10637 16 39 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10638 16 315 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10642 16 338 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10643 16 403 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10645 16 360 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-10646 16 44 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11733 16 295 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-19115 16 31 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-11757 16 296 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-17567 16 110 Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Pipeline W-16049 18 389 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-12915 24 479 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-19070 24 11 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Pipeline W-18203 36 132 Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10885 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10024 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11011 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11362 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10274 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11833 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10392 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10264 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10866 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11534 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12898 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10267 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11465 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11231 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10348 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13127 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12465 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13125 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10339 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10951 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10286 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10965 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10432 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10266 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11845 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11675 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10265 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10189 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11219 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12358 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12774 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10752 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12738 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11839 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13143 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11374 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11008 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral WLAT-12212 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10836 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10191 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10821 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11028 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10419 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10270 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12773 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10472 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12091 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12769 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10832 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12973 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12794 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12056 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11841 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12797 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10749 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10285 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11373 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12233 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11956 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10268 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11009 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11355 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11686 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11040 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11239 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10340 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10878 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11847 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13261 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11171 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10379 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10341 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13245 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11569 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10819 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12791 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12009 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12796 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral WLAT-10471 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12798 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12792 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10823 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11012 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12739 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10879 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10033 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11033 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11674 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10174 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10121 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10421 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10485 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13200 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11189 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11170 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12522 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12905 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12845 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11069 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10712 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12492 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11230 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11222 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10475 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11559 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10751 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11838 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11006 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10822 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12783 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12281 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11955 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12190 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12201 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10269 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10886 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12789 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12164 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11023 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral WLAT-11007 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12806 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11064 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11036 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11946 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10277 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13124 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11843 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11179 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10953 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12234 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13270 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11068 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13159 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12202 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13849 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11592 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10524 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10775 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10276 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10420 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10837 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10273 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10006 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10474 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12784 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11176 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13142 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11041 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10877 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11063 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10881 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10833 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13126 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12132 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10829 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13160 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10388 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13239 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11837 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13199 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral WLAT-12020 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10750 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10718 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11846 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12501 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11735 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12394 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11072 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10418 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12203 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11363 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10526 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10186 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10282 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10776 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13248 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12320 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10820 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11010 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10281 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11065 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11570 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10478 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12531 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11948 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10828 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12004 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10759 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12232 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10272 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10279 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12790 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10651 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13262 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10882 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12611 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11464 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11840 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10192 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10477 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10875 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral WLAT-11954 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11066 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10758 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11962 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10263 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11358 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10190 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10337 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10280 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10278 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12733 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11758 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12847 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12781 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10838 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12901 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10964 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13235 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11685 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10602 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12770 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11945 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10427 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10193 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10774 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11350 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13354 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11161 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10385 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11361 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11952 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13234 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12566 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10262 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13242 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10039 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13238 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12846 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11047 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10780 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12746 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
A-2. Proposed Pipeline and Service Lateral R&R
Type ID Diameter, inch Length, ft Replacement Year
Lateral WLAT-11178 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-13263 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11953 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12740 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10347 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12630 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12505 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10871 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12504 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12324 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-11173 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-12772 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10271 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10034 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
Lateral WLAT-10470 - - Long-Term (2036-2050)
268-60-22-20
City of Fairfield
Water Distribution System Condition Assessment
Last Revised: 03-20-2024
2023 Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Appendix G
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update

PREPARED FOR
City of Fairfield
ADDENDUM | NOVEMBER 2023
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan – Update
Prepared for
City of Fairfield
Project No. 268-40-22-15
November 29, 2023
Anne Girtz, PE Date
April 14, 2023
Kambria Tiano, PE Date
November 29, 2023
Tyler Newman, PE Date
November 29, 2023
QA/QC Review: Michael Zacharia, PE Date
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
i City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Background....................................................................................................................................1-1

1.2 Scope of Update ............................................................................................................................1-1

1.3 Structure of Addendum.................................................................................................................1-2

2.0 Condition Assessment ...............................................................................................................2-1

2.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................2-1

2.1.1 Visual Condition Assessment...............................................................................................2-1

2.1.2 Pump Performance Testing .................................................................................................2-1

2.1.3 Materials Testing .................................................................................................................2-2

2.2 Analysis and Results ......................................................................................................................2-2

2.2.1 Visual Condition Assessment...............................................................................................2-2

2.2.2 Pump Performance Testing .................................................................................................2-3

2.2.2.1 Pump Capacity............................................................................................................2-3

2.2.2.2 Pump Efficiency ..........................................................................................................2-6

2.2.3 Preliminary Operational Analysis.........................................................................................2-8

2.2.3.1 Preliminary Operational Analysis – Pump Curves......................................................2-8

2.2.3.2 Secondary Operational Analysis – System Curves ...................................................2-11

2.2.4 Materials Testing ...............................................................................................................2-17

2.2.4.1 Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station ...............................................................2-17

2.2.4.2 Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station ................................................................2-17

3.0 Capacity Assessment .................................................................................................................3-1

3.1 Assessment Approach ...................................................................................................................3-1

3.1.1 Pumping Capacity Requirements.........................................................................................3-1

3.1.2 Water Demands by Pressure Zone ......................................................................................3-3

3.2 Results ...........................................................................................................................................3-3

4.0 Risk Assessment........................................................................................................................4-1

4.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................4-1

4.2 Results ...........................................................................................................................................4-3

4.2.1 Component Risk Levels........................................................................................................4-3

4.2.2 Component Risk Levels by Pump Station.............................................................................4-3

4.2.3 Facility Risk Levels................................................................................................................4-4

4.2.3.1 Facility Likelihood.......................................................................................................4-4

4.2.3.2 Facility Consequence..................................................................................................4-5

4.2.3.3 Facility Risk Results.....................................................................................................4-6

5.0 Updated Asset Management Plan Recommendations.................................................................5-1

5.1 Recommended 10-Year Rehabilitation/Replacement Program....................................................5-2

5.2 Recommended Next Steps............................................................................................................5-6 N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
ii City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table of Contents

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1. Pump Station Facilities included in AMP Update ...............................................................1-2 Table 2-1. Visual Condition and Performance Scoring Index ..............................................................2-1 Table 2-2. Pump Operation versus Nameplate Ratings ......................................................................2-4 Table 2-3. City of Fairfield Pump Station Wire to Water Efficiency ....................................................2-6 Table 2-4. Preliminary Pump Deficiency Observations.....................................................................2-10 Table 2-5. Pump and System Observations.......................................................................................2-12 Table 2-6 General Pump Operating Scenarios ..................................................................................2-13 Table 2-7. Pump and System Conclusions and Recommendations...................................................2-13 Table 2-8. System Valves Immediately Downstream of Pump Station .............................................2-16 Table 3-1. Existing Pumping Capacities by Pressure Zone and Service Area ......................................3-4 Table 4-1. Summary of Component Risk Assessment Results ............................................................4-3 Table 4-2. Component Value Weighting for Facility Likelihood Calculation .......................................4-5 Table 4-3. Summary of Facility Risk Assessment Results ....................................................................4-6 Table 5-1. Recommended 10-Year Replacement and Rehabilitation Program ..................................5-3 Table 5-2. Recommended Rehab/Replacement Program Details.......................................................5-4

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1. Example Capacity Deficiency Scenarios ............................................................................2-9 Figure 3-1. Existing Water System and Pressure Zones ......................................................................3-2 Figure 4-1. Pump Station Risk Assessment Methodology...................................................................4-1 Figure 4-2. Risk Level Matrix (PUMP Update) .....................................................................................4-2 Figure 4-3. Risk Levels of Assets, Percent of Total ..............................................................................4-4 Figure 4-4. Facility Risk Levels.............................................................................................................4-7 Figure 5-1. Action Plan Matrix.............................................................................................................5-1

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A. Pump Performance Testing Results
Appendix B. Materials Testing Results
Appendix C. Component Risk Results, Rehab/Replacement Projects, and Action Plan by Facility Appendix D. Facility Risk Inputs and Outputs
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
iii City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table of Contents

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AMP Asset Management Plan 1-1
BEP Best Efficiency Point
City City of Fairfield 1-1
gpm Gallons Per Minute 2-5
PETS Pump Efficiency Testing Services 2-3
POR Preferred Operating Region
psi Pounds Per Square Inch 2-5
TDH Total Dynamic Head 2-3
V&A V&A Consulting Engineers 2-5
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
1-1 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background
In 2015, the City of Fairfield (City) undertook a condition and risk assessment of the City’s 16 potable water pump stations and two raw water pump stations. Results from the assessments were used to determine the functionality of the facilities and estimate the remaining useful life of the components. A risk-based system was developed to prioritize the most urgent improvements and define triggers that indicate when a pump station is ready for a maintenance or improvement action. The resulting Asset Management Plan (AMP) provided recommendations for an optimized preventative maintenance program and a rehabilitation/replacement program which specified recommended actions through 2020.

Since 2015, the City has implemented most of the high and medium priority recommendations from the AMP including both adjustments to maintenance practices and capital rehabilitation/replacement projects. The City now desires to update the AMP and develop a 10-year capital improvement plan for its water pump stations. This AMP update is presented as an Addendum to the 2015 AMP.

In March 2023, the City reported that the Rancho Solano 4 Pump Station experienced a catastrophic failure of the discharge manifold beneath the pump house slab. The failure was to assets not associated with this asset management plan update. The City is currently investigating the failed assets and the cause of the failure and will likely undertake a major rehabilitation of the facility. The evaluation of the Rancho Solano 4 Pump Station is included in this asset management plan update based on observations and analysis prior to the buried piping failure and the recommendations will be used to inform the scope of the rehabilitation of the facility.

1.2 Scope of Update
The AMP update includes assessment of 14 of the water pump stations evaluated in 2015 and an additional 2 pump stations not included in the 2015 evaluation. As shown in Table 1, each facility was visually assessed during a site visit and pump performance testing was performed to evaluate flow meter accuracy and to develop performance points (head and flow) of each pump. Additional assessment was performed as shown below:
• Detailed electrical assessments were performed at Rolling Hills, Rancho Solano Zone 4, and both the Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations. Coating and steel thickness testing was performed at the Rancho Solano pumping stations, which were not assessed in 2015.
• A performance deficiency study was completed for pumps at several pump stations identified by the City.
• Facility capacity analyses were performed for Pressure Zones 2 and 4 to evaluate the existing pumping capacity of the Rolling Hills and Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Stations.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
1-2 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 1-1. Pump Station Facilities included in AMP Update Pumping Station Facility
Visual
Condition
Assessment
Pump
Performance
Testing
Capacity
Assessment
Pump
Deficiency
Assessment
Detailed
EI&C
Assessment
Coating
and Steel
Thickness
Testing
Facilities Assessed in 2015
Paradise Valley X X X
Rancho Solano Zone 5 X X
Mangels X X
Rolling Hills X X X X X
Martin Hill X X
Rancho Solano Zone 4(a) X X X X X
Eastridge X X
Southbrook #1 X X
Gold Ridge X X
Sanctuary Zone 3 X X
Sanctuary Zone 4 X X X
Rancho Solano Zone 3 X X
Southbrook #2 X X
South Cordelia X X
Facilities Not Fully Assessed in 2015 Study
Rancho Solano Golf Course X X X X
Rancho Solano Raw Water X X X X
(a) As mentioned above, Rancho Solano Zone 4 (RSZ4) was rehabilitated in 2023, after publishing of an earlier draft of this report. In the risk assessment sections of this report, RSZ4 is presented as ‘RSZ4’, which is the facility pre-rehabilitation and as ‘RSZ4 (2023)’, which is the facility after rehabilitation.

1.3 Structure of Addendum
This Addendum includes:
• Section 2 - Condition Assessment – Describes the visual and performance testing assessments that were performed on the 16 pump stations and provides a summary of results. Presents a pump deficiency analysis of select pumps based on direction of the City and outcome of the pump performance testing.
• Section 3 - Capacity Assessment – Describes the capacity assessment that was performed on the Rolling Hills and Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Stations and provides a summary of results. • Section 4 - Risk Assessment – Summarizes the risk assessment that was updated based on new condition assessment results and provides a summary of results. • Section 5 - Updated Asset Management Plan Recommendations – Presents a prioritized 10-year program based on condition and risk assessment results.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
1-3 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
In general, the methodology for each of these project tasks followed the same approach as the 2015 study.

In those cases, an overview summary of the methodology is provided. Where the approach was expanded upon or varied from the 2015 study, the detailed methodology is described.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-1 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

2.0 CONDITION ASSESSMENT
This chapter discusses the methodology used to assess the condition of the City’s pump stations and summarizes the assessment results.

2.1 Methodology
The condition assessment consisted of visual inspections, pump performance testing, and coating and steel thickness testing. The methodology for visual and pump performance testing followed the same approach as the 2015 study; these are summarized in the following sections. Coating and steel thickness testing methodology is discussed in detail.

2.1.1 Visual Condition Assessment
West Yost conducted site visits of the 16 pump stations between June 14 and June 21, 2022. The site visits were conducted by a condition assessment team that included the City’s Senior Instrumentation Technician, and engineers from West Yost. The team conducted visual inspections of the civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and controls systems. The assessment team did not conduct confined space entries, destructive testing, or assessments of below grade piping, valves or appurtenances.

The team observed the external condition and performance of the facilities and equipment. Based on the observations, West Yost assigned a score to each component using the scoring index defined in Table 2-1 (Table 6 in 2015 AMP).

Table 2-1. Visual Condition and Performance Scoring Index Score Condition Score Index Performance Score Index(a)
1 Excellent Component functioning as Intended
2 Slight visible degradation In Service, but higher than expected O&M costs 3 Visible degradation In service, but function is impaired 4 Integrity of component moderately compromised In service, but function is highly impaired 5 Integrity of component severely compromised Component is not functioning as intended (a) Pump performance (capacity and efficiency) was assessed separately; see Section 2.2.2

2.1.2 Pump Performance Testing
Pump performance and efficiency testing was conducted by Pump Efficiency Testing Services (PETS) between June 14 and June 29, 2022. For each pump station, testing by PETS included the following:
• Pump Flow Tests – Testing included flow rate measurements using a portable ultrasonic flowmeter attached to the pump discharge piping, and suction and discharge pressure at three operating points. Measurements were taken for each pump at the City’s pump stations. The suction and discharge pressure measurements were used to calculate the total dynamic head (TDH) at each operating point.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-2 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
• Flow Meter Verification – Up to 15 measurements were taken using the ultrasonic flowmeter, which were used to compare with the flow rate indicated on the City’s flow meters to verify City meter accuracy.
• Thermal/Infrared Images – Thermal image photographs were taken of the control panels and included the breakers, transformers, relays, motor starters, and rectifiers. • Energy Cost Savings Analysis – Using the flow and TDH measured during the pump flow tests, an analysis was conducted for each pump to determine the viability of replacing the pump with a more efficient unit.

2.1.3 Materials Testing
Concrete and metal condition assessments were performed by West Yost’s subconsultant, V&A Consulting Engineers (V&A), on June 21, 2022 at Rancho Solano Raw Water and Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Stations. The V&A assessment followed the same rating system as the visual assessment. The methodology is described in detail in Appendix B and summarized below.

Concrete surfaces were observed visually for cracks, delamination, corrosion, and other concrete defects.

The surfaces were documented using digital, still photographs. Additionally, concrete sounding was performed within the buildings at both facilities to investigate for shallow, subsurface discontinuities.

Sounding was conducted using a hammer to strike accessible concrete surfaces and observing the qualities of the sound returned.

The condition of various metallic piping was evaluated using ultrasonic testing to assess the wall thickness; the effects of corrosion are identifiable when the wall thickness is measured less than the maximum, based on new pipe. Additionally, dry film thickness testing was performed on metallic piping and equipment components to determine the extent of protective coating deterioration.

2.2 Analysis and Results
This section presents the results from the visual condition assessments, pump performance testing, pump capacity deficiency analysis, and materials testing.

2.2.1 Visual Condition Assessment
The results of the condition assessment for each pump station are summarized in Appendix C.

Most of the mechanical equipment is in similar condition as was documented in the 2015 assessment, with slightly further deterioration noted. Some of the equipment has been replaced since the last assessment.

Although many of the pumps have been rebuilt over the years, most of them have outlived the typical useful life for centrifugal pumps. In general, the piping was found to be in marginally good condition with localized corrosion and coating deterioration noted. Several of the rubber pipe couplings were found to be deteriorating and in need of replacement. Several of the isolation valves were found to be moderately corroded with some evidence of leakage and need repair or replacement. Much of the electrical, instrumentation, and controls equipment are now past the useful life and in need of replacement.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-3 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

2.2.2 Pump Performance Testing
This section presents the results of the performance testing completed for the pumps assessed and includes separate discussions for the capacity and efficiency observed for each pump.

2.2.2.1 Pump Capacity
Table 2-2 summarizes the measured flow and TDH and compares it to the pump name plate flow and TDH for each pump at each station. Appendix A presents the pump curves with the field-measured operating points indicated. Paradise Valley, Rancho Solano Zone 4, Rolling Hills, and Sanctuary 4 Pump Stations were identified by the City as having issues related to flow rates that are significantly less than the nameplate duty point. In addition to these four City-identified deficient stations, capacity deficiencies were observed at multiple other stations as part of the performance testing conducted. Deficient pumps are considered to be those delivering less than 82 percent of nameplate flow (deficient by over 18 percent). These pumps, along with the pumps at stations identified by the City as being deficient and are highlighted in Table 2-2.

These deficient pumps are analyzed in further detail in Section 2.2.3.2.

The City reported after performance testing that both pumps at Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Station are regularly operated with the downstream isolation valves in a partially throttled position. The pumps are normally operated in this manner to avoid amperage outside the service factor of 1.15 percent, which happens when the pumps are completely unthrottled. The normal pumping capacity under this operating condition is therefore much less than what could be achieved with fully unthrottled pumps.

It was also noted that the nameplate data for Pumps 1 through 3 at Goldridge Pump Station appear to conflict. More specifically, the nameplate flow and TDH are listed as 1000 gpm and 100’ TDH and the impeller diameter is listed as 10.69 gpm on each nameplate. However, based on the published pump curves, the listed nameplate flow and TDH should equate to an impeller diameter of approximately 12 inches. It is therefore unclear which pump curve should apply for these pumps. The measured operation points fall between the pump curves for a 10.69-inch and a 12-inch impeller diameter.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-4 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
April 2023
Table 2-2. Pump Operation versus Nameplate Ratings
(Pumps performing greater than 18 percent below design operating point are highlighted in red) Pump
Station Pump
Measured
Flow, gpm
Nameplate
Flow, gpm
Difference in
Flow, gpm
(percent)
Measured
TDH, ft
Nameplate
TDH, ft
Difference in
TDH, ft
(percent)
South
Cordelia
P1 1901 1900 1 (0.1) 25 42.5 -17.5 (-41.2)
P2 1957 1900 57 (3) 23 42.5 -19.5 (-45.9)
P3 1972 1900 72 (3.8) 23 42.5 -19.5 (-45.9)
Gold Ridge
P1 960 1000 -40 (-4) 95 100 -5 (-5)
P2 942 1000 -58 (-5.8) 95 100 -5 (-5)
P3 914 1000 -86 (-8.6) 95 100 -5 (-5)
P4 1373 1385 -12 (-0.9) 104 110 -6 (-5.5)
Mangels
P1 295 360 -65 (-18.1) 150 137 13 (9.5)
P2 292 360 -68 (-18.9) 148 137 11 (8)
Martin Hill
P1 1121 1400 -279 (-19.9) 129 114 14.4 (12.6)
P2 1140 1400 -260 (-18.6) 141 114 26.4 (23)
P3 1066 1400 -334 (-23.9) 139 114 24.4 (21.3)
Paradise
Valley
P1 739 1400 -661 (-47.2) 123 100 17 (16)
P2 700 1400 -700 (-50) 125 100 19 (17.9)
P3 804 1400 -596 (-42.6) 127 100 21 (19.8)
Rolling Hills
P1 1010 1400 -390 (-27.9) 129 115 14 (12.2)
P2 1048 1400 -352 (-25.1) 129 115 14 (12.2)
P3 965 1400 -435 (-31.1) 129 115 14 (12.2)
South
Brook #1
P1 345 450 -105 (-23.3) 90 100 -10 (-10)
P2 360 450 -90 (-20) 97 100 -3 (-3)
P3 221 450 -229 (-50.9) 99 100 -1 (-1)
P4 872 1250 -378 (-30.2) 116 90 26 (28.9)
South
Brook #2
P1 328 450 -122 (-27.1) 99 105 -6 (-5.7)
P2 448 450 -2 (-0.4) 81 105 -24 (-22.9)
P3 412 450 -38 (-8.4) 81 105 -24 (-22.9)
P4 962 1250 -288 (-23) 81 100 -19 (-19)
Eastridge
P1 215 180 35 (19.4) 157 195 -38 (-19.5)
P2 190 180 10 (5.6) 157 195 -38 (-19.5)
P3 210 180 30 (16.7) 159 195 -36 (-18.5)
P4 1194 1250 -56 (-4.5) 185 195 -10 (-5.1)
Rancho
Solano
Zone 3
P1 530 705 -175 (-24.8) 240 245 -5 (-2)
P2 525 705 -180 (-25.5) 226 245 -19 (-7.8)
P3 555 705 -150 (-21.3) 231 245 -14 (-5.7)
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-5 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
April 2023
Table 2-2. Pump Operation versus Nameplate Ratings
(Pumps performing greater than 18 percent below design operating point are highlighted in red) Pump
Station Pump
Measured
Flow, gpm
Nameplate
Flow, gpm
Difference in
Flow, gpm
(percent)
Measured
TDH, ft
Nameplate
TDH, ft
Difference in
TDH, ft
(percent)
Sanctuary
Zone 3
P1 306 425 -119 (-28) 113 115 -2 (-1.7)
P2 211 425 -214 (-50.4) 88 115 -27 (-23.5)
P3 211 425 -214 (-50.4) 88 115 -27 (-23.5)
P4 786 1250 -464 (-37.1) 129 115 14 (12.2)
Rancho
Solano
Zone 4
P1 (a) 184 Not
Available (b)
194 Not
Available (b)
P2 (a) 249 Not
Available (b)
194 Not
Available (b)
Sanctuary
Zone 4
P1 236 270 -34 (-12.6) 132 135 -3 (-2.2)
P2 236 270 -34 (-12.6) 132 135 -3 (-2.2)
P3 671 1250 -579 (-46.3) 148 124 24 (19.4)
Rancho
Solano
Zone 5
P1 75 53.27 21.73
(40.8)
116 180 -64 (-35.6)
P2 65 53.27 11.73 (22) 132 180 -48 (-26.7)
P3 65 53.27 11.73 (22) 136 180 -44 (-24.4)
Rancho
Solano Golf
Course
P1 1446 1300 146 (11.2) 270 145 125 (86.2)
P2 1300 750 550 (73.3) 309 Not
Available
P3 679 500 179 (35.8) 316 Not
Available
Rancho
Solano Raw
Water
P1 424 600 -176 (-29.3) 153 176 -23 (-13.1)
P2 525 600 -75 (-12.5) 155 176 -21 (-11.9)
P3 449 600 -151 (-25.2) 153 176 -23 (-13.1)
P4 190 200 -10 (-5) 153 158 -5 (-3.2)
(a) After performance testing Pump 1 and Pump 2 were reported by the City as being normally operated in a partially throttled condition, as the motors will operate outside the 1.15% service factor if completely unthrottled. (b) Nameplates for Pump 1 and Pump 2 at Rancho Solano Zone 4 do not have flow or TDH values listed; therefore, assessment of the measured operating points at that facility with respect to pump nameplate data could not be conducted.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-6 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

2.2.2.2 Pump Efficiency
Table 2-3 summarizes the measured wire to water efficiency, the calculated pump efficiency, and the theoretical pump efficiency for each of the pumps included in this study. The theoretical pump efficiency is based on plots of the measured pump operating points on the manufacturer’s performance curves.

Appendix A presents the detailed results of the testing including observed operating flow and head plotted on the pump curves used to estimate theoretical efficiency.

As discussed in the 2015 assessment, a typical clean water pump should have an efficiency of approximately 70 percent or greater when operating at its design point. Of the 55 pumps assessed, 31 had calculated efficiencies less than 70 percent, indicating significantly diminished operating efficiencies.

The 31 pumps and their facilities are highlighted in Table 2-3. The reduced efficiencies generally can be attributed to the pumps operating at points divergent from the associated nameplate duty point.

The 31 pumps and their facilities are highlighted in Table 2-3.

Table 2-3. City of Fairfield Pump Station Wire to Water Efficiency Pump Station Pump
Measured
Wire to Water
Efficiency
Calculated
Pump
Efficiency
Theoretical
Pump
Efficiency (a)
Delta,
percent
South Cordelia
P1 0.44 0.47 (c) 0.85 -38.4
P2 0.38 0.41 (c) 0.85 -43.8
P3 0.40 0.43 (c) 0.85 -41.5
Gold Ridge
P1 0.68 0.74 0.82 -7.8
P2 0.67 0.72 0.82 -10.4
P3 0.67 0.72 0.82 -9.7
P4 0.65 0.68 (c)
Mangels
P1 0.67 0.77 0.76 1.1
P2 0.66 0.74 0.75 -1.3
Martin Hill
P1 0.40 0.76 0.85 -9.3
P2 0.78 0.83 0.85 -2.1
P3 0.75 0.80 0.85 -5.4
Paradise Valley
P1 0.59 0.65 (c) 0.81 -15.7
P2 0.57 0.63 (c) 0.77 -14.3
P3 0.68 0.71 0.78 -6.7
Rolling Hills
P1 0.68 0.74 0.85 -11.4
P2 0.71 0.76 0.85 -9.2
P3 0.68 0.74 0.84 -10.5
South Brook 1
P1 0.56 0.59 (c) 0.75 -16.4
P2 0.61 0.66 (c) 0.75 -9.0
P3 0.46 0.50 (c) 0.6 -10.4
P4 0.69 0.72 0.83 -10.9
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-7 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 2-3. City of Fairfield Pump Station Wire to Water Efficiency Pump Station Pump
Measured
Wire to Water
Efficiency
Calculated
Pump
Efficiency
Theoretical
Pump
Efficiency (a)
Delta,
percent
South Brook 2
P1 0.56 0.57 (c) 0.73 -12.8
P2 0.54 0.58 (c) 0.73 -12.3
P3 0.51 0.54 (c) 0.73 -16.4
P4 0.45 0.48 (c) 0.76 -36.0
Eastridge
P1 0.57 0.61 (c) 0.73 -8.7
P2 0.49 0.54 (c) 0.73 -16.3
P3 0.56 0.61 (c) 0.73 -9.4
P4 0.71 0.75 0.81 -5.4
Rancho Solano Zone 3
P1 0.61 0.64 (c) 0.70 -5.5
P2 0.57 0.61 (c) 0.70 -9.0
P3 0.62 0.66 (c) 0.70 -4.0
Sanctuary Zone 3
P1 0.62 0.67 (c) 0.70 -3.2
P2 0.38 0.41 (c) 0.70 -29.0
P3 0.38 0.47 (c) 0.70 -23.2
P4 0.62 0.65 (c) 0.70 -5.3
Rancho Solano Zone 4
P1 0.61 0.68 (c) 0.75 -7.1
P2 0.71 0.79 0.77 1.6
Sanctuary Zone 4
P1 0.60 0.65 (c) 0.77 -11.5
P2 0.60 0.65 (c) 0.77 -11.5
P3 0.60 0.64 (c) 0.75 -11.2
Rancho Solano Zone 5
P1 0.53 0.64 (c) (b)
P2 0.52 0.63 (c) (b)
P3 0.54 0.64 (c) (b)
Rancho Solano Golf Course
P1 0.67 0.71 (d)
P2 0.71 0.76 (d)
P3 0.65 0.72 (d)
Rancho Solano Raw Water
P1 0.57 0.63 (c) (d)
P2 0.65 0.72 (d)
P3 0.71 0.78 (d)
P4 0.65 0.73 (d)
(a) Theoretical pump efficiency is based on plots of the measured pump operating points against the published pump curve. (b) Pumps at Rancho Solano Zone 5 Pump Station are new Grundfos pumps on a new skid. Pump curves have not been provided by the manufacturer.
(c) Calculated pump efficiency for indicated pump is less than the 70 percent efficiency typical for clean water pumps. (d) For the golf course and raw water pump stations, the City is primarily concerned with the physical condition of the pumps. Therefore, theoretical pump efficiency assessments were not performed.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-8 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

2.2.3 Preliminary Operational Analysis
Pump operation was analyzed based on pump curve performance and pump performance within the modelled system curve.

2.2.3.1 Preliminary Operational Analysis – Pump Curves
The first step to analyzing the operational performance was to assess the TDH and flowrate measured for each of the individual pumps and compare these values to the manufacturer’s published pump curve. A capacity deficiency could be indicated by two general scenarios, depending on where a given pump is operating relative to the published pump curve. Figure 2-1 illustrates the two general scenarios, which are further described below.

Scenario 1 is when the pump is operating along the pump curve, but farther to the left compared to the nameplate duty point. In this scenario, the actual flow rate is less than the nameplate flow, and the actual TDH is greater than the nameplate TDH. This scenario generally suggests greater head loss downstream of the pump moving performance left of the design operating point.

Factors that could cause increased frictional losses include but are not limited to:
• Valves that are inadvertently throttled instead of being completely open • Scale buildup on the interior walls of the pipelines
• Sediment accumulation along the length of the pipelines.

Scenario 2 is when the pump is operating at a point divergent from the pump curve with an actual flow rate that is less than the nameplate flow. In this scenario, the actual TDH could be more or less than the nameplate TDH, but since the pump is operating at a point below the pump curve, it is generally an indication that the pump has deteriorated to some degree.

Factors that could cause divergence of the pump performance from the manufacturer’s pump curve include but are not limited to:
• Recirculation of water within the pump due to worn seal rings between the impeller and the volute
• Wear or damage to the impeller
• Poorly seated valves of the non-operating pumps allowing some water to recirculate to the suction side
• Pump motor operating at speeds less than the design nameplate speed Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-9 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Figure 2-1. Example Capacity Deficiency Scenarios
In addition to the pump performance testing results, data provided by the City was also used for four deficient stations identified by the City. City data for each pump station included actual overall flow rate in gallons per minute (gpm), and suction and discharge pressure in pounds per square inch (psi). The flow and pressure data were recorded by the City in five-minute increments between the dates of September 1, 2021, through September 1, 2022. This data did not distinguish flow and pressure per each individual pump, but rather was cumulative for the entire pump station. The data for Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Station included flow data for the date range listed above, but only included discharge pressure through May 5, 2022, and did not include any suction pressure data. Since the City data did not distinguish flow and pressure for the individual pumps, it was used primarily as a means to validate the results of the pump performance testing. Validation was accomplished by inferring which data points applied to a single pump operating; these specific data points were then compared to the operation points obtained from the pump performance testing.

As previously illustrated in Table 2-2, the measured flow rate for many of the pumps consistently differs from the associated nameplate flow. Table 2-4 presents a summary of the preliminary performance observations for these deficient pumps evaluated.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-10 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 2-4. Preliminary Pump Deficiency Observations
Pump Station Observations
Mangels • Pumps 1 and 2 operate at points that closely follow the pump curve and produce approximately 81 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) Martin Hill • Pumps 1, 2 and 3 operate at points that closely follow the pump curve and produce approximately 76–81 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) Paradise Valley • Pumps 1, 2 and 3 operate at points slightly below the pump curve and produce approximately 50–57 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) Rolling Hills • Pumps 1, 2 and 3 operate at points slightly below the pump curve and produce approximately 69–75 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) South Brook 1
• Pumps 1 and 2 operate at points below the pump curve and produce approximately 77-80 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 2) • Pump 3 operates at a point below the pump curve and produces approximately 50 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 2) • Pump 4 operates at a point that closely follows the pump curve and produces approximately 49 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) South Brook 2 • Pumps 1 and 4 operate at points below their respective pump curve and produce approximately 73–77 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 2) Rancho Solano Zone 3 • Pumps 1, 2 and 3 operate at points slightly below the pump curve and produce approximately 75–79 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) Sanctuary 3
• Pump 1 operates at a point that closely follows the pump curve and produces approximately 72 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) • Pumps 2 and 3 operate at points below the pump curve and produce approximately 50 percent of the nameplate flow.(Scenario 2) • Pump 4 operates at a point that closely follows the pump curve and produces approximately 63 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) Rancho Solano Zone 4 • Pumps 1 and 2 operate at points below the pump curve. No nameplate data to compare.

Sanctuary 4
• Pumps 1 and 2 operate at points slightly below the pump curve and produce approximately 87 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) • Pump 3 operates at points that closely follow the pump curve and produces approximately 54 percent of the nameplate flow. (Scenario 1) Rancho Solano Raw Water
• Pumps 1 and 3 are observed to be deficient with respect to flow rate, producing approximately 71 and 75 percent of the nameplate flow, respectively. A detailed pump curve analysis was not conducted for this facility, as it is not owned by the City. Based on Pumps 1 and 3 also operating with less TDH than indicated on the nameplate, it is concluded there are no throttled valves or unintended additional TDH in the system, and that Pumps 1 and 3 are therefore operating below the pump curve (Scenario 2)
Southbrook 1 and 2 pump stations discharge to hydropneumatics tanks such that the system curve is flat delivering steady flow and head. Rancho Solano Raw Water pump station is not owned by the City and is not a part of the City’s hydraulic model. No additional analysis was performed to evaluate performance along the system curve at these facilities.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-11 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
For the deficient pumps that operate on the pump curve but at higher TDH than the nameplate value, as a starting point it is recommended that the City confirm there are no valves that are inadvertently throttled downstream of the pumping station. As previously discussed, this is a common way for increased frictional losses to be induced into a pumping system and can be easily corrected. Additionally, for deficient pumps that are operating at points that are divergent from the pump curve, it is recommended to pull the pump and check the seal ring and impeller to verify whether they are damaged or worn; another recommendation is to verify whether the valves on the non-operating pumps are properly seated and do not allow recirculation.

These recommendations are included in Appendix C with a zero-cost value (recommended for Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments). It is assumed the recommendation will be performed as a maintenance effort.

The remaining pumps are further evaluated for system performance in Section 2.2.3.2.

2.2.3.2 Secondary Operational Analysis – System Curves
A secondary analysis was performed for facilities identified in Table 2-4 with the exception of Southbrook Pump Station 1 and 2 and Rancho Solano Raw Water as noted earlier. Using the City’s hydraulic model of the distribution system, West Yost developed system curves to determine the proper operating range along the pump curve. System curves were developed for a range of scenarios and was overlayed with the published pump curves to identify the range along the pump curve that the pumps should actually perform. This can confirm whether the pump is theoretically a suitable selection for the given system. A good selection is indicated by the point of intersection falling within the pump’s preferred operating region (POR), whereas a poor selection is indicated by a point of intersection falling outside the pump’s POR. A typical POR commonly accepted in the industry for centrifugal pumps is defined as a flow rate between 70 percent to 120 percent of the flow at the best efficiency point (BEP).

Following the assessment of the published pump curve relative to the modeled system curve, West Yost then considered the operating points measured during the recent pump performance testing with respect to the system curve. This step involved assessing where the operating points are located graphically with respect to the modeled system curve. If the operating points fall within the range of modeled system curves, it is a good indication that the City is operating the overall system in a consistent manner as assumed for preparation of the hydraulic model. If the operating points fall outside of the range of system curves, it is likely that the system is being operated in a manner that is inconsistent with the model. For example, valves could be unintentionally throttled, or additional flow could have been introduced at a location downstream from the pump station – both of these scenarios would result in additional TDH (and less flow) than expected based on the intersection of the system and pump curves. Plots of the modeled system curves overlaid with the published pump curves and measured operating points are provided with Appendix A.

Table 2-5 summarizes the results of the pump and system curve analysis, identifying pumps performing within the system curve range and also identify if the POR is within that range. Pumps should be operating within the system curve range and ideally the POR will as well for greatest efficiency.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-12 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 2-5. Pump and System Observations
Pump Station, Pump No.

Actual Performance Within System
Curve Range (Y/N)
Published Pump POR Within
System Curve Range (Y/N)
Rancho Solano Zone 4, P1 Yes No
Rancho Solano Zone 4, P2 Yes No
Sanctuary 4, P1 Yes Yes
Sanctuary 4, P2 Yes Yes
Sanctuary 4, P3 Yes No
Rancho Solano Zone 3, P1 No Yes
Rancho Solano Zone 3, P2 No Yes
Rancho Solano Zone 3, P3 No Yes
Sanctuary 3, P1 Yes No
Sanctuary 3, P2 No No
Sanctuary 3, P3 No No
Sanctuary 3, P4 Yes No
Mangels, P1 No No
Mangels, P2 No No
Rolling Hills, P1 No No
Rolling Hills, P2 No No
Rolling Hills, P3 No No
Martin Hill, P1 No No
Martin Hill, P2 No No
Martin Hill, P3 No No
Paradise Valley, P1 No No
Paradise Valley, P2 No No
Paradise Valley, P3 No No
Combining the results of the assessments described above and summarized in Tables 2-4 and 2-5 provide a relationship between two main points: whether the pump is operating on its pump curve; and whether the pump is operating within a range of flow/TDH that should be expected based on the modeled system curves. Different recommendations are drawn based on the answers to these two questions and can be generalized based on the four cases below.

General Scenario 1: Pump is operating on or very near its published pump curve and POR is within the range of modeled system curves. If measured operation is also within the range of modeled system curves, no action is recommended. If measured operation is outside the range of modeled system curves, further investigations are recommended.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-13 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
General Scenario 2: Pump is operating on or very near its published pump curve and POR is outside the range of modeled system curves. Since POR is outside the range of modeled system curves, pump replacement with one with a better fitting POR is typically recommended. Common issues under this scenario include additional frictional loss in the form of throttled valves, scale buildup, smaller piping diameter than what has been recorded, introduction of an undocumented flow addition downstream of the station.

General Scenario 3: Pump is operating off its published pump curve and POR is within the range of modeled system curves. Since the pump selection is theoretically suitable for the modeled system under this scenario, typical causes for operation off the pump curve include wear on the impeller, recirculation of flow through isolation valves or through the station PRV.

General Scenario 4: Pump is operating off its published pump curve and POR is outside the range of modeled system curves. Since POR is outside the range of modeled system curves, pump replacement with one with a better fitting POR is typically recommended.

This is illustrated in Table 2-6 below.

Table 2-6 General Pump Operating Scenarios
General Scenario Pump Operating on Performance Curve POR is within System Curves 1 Yes Yes
2 Yes No
3 No Yes
4 No No
For all cases, if the POR (between 70 percent and 120 percent of the BEP flow) falls within the range of modeled system curves, it is an indication of a good pump selection for the given system; similarly, if the POR falls outside the range of modeled system curves, it is an indication of a poor pump selection.

Table 2-7 summarizes the general scenarios and recommendations for each pump analyzed.

Table 2-7. Pump and System Conclusions and Recommendations Pump Station, Pump No.

General
Scenario Conclusion / Recommendation
Rancho Solano Zone 4, P1 and P2 4
• Conclusion: Full flow performance amperage is outside the motor service factor – both pumps must be throttled so
that electrical current is within acceptable limits.
• Recommendation: Replace both pumps.

Sanctuary 4, P1 and P2 3
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of
modeled system curves; actual operation points measured in field deviate significantly from the published
performance curve, indicative of different pumps
altogether.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-14 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 2-7. Pump and System Conclusions and Recommendations Pump Station, Pump No.

General
Scenario Conclusion / Recommendation
• Recommendation: Continue operating pumps to failure;
coordinate with manufacturer to verify correct pump curve.

Sanctuary 4, P3 2
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of
modeled system curves; measured operating points are
very close to the published performance curve, and far to the left of the published BEP (i.e., outside of the POR). • Recommendation: Continue operating pump to failure.

Rancho Solano Zone 3, P1, P2 and
P3 3
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of
modeled system curves; measured operating points are
slightly lower than the published performance curve, and far to the left of the published BEP (i.e., outside of the POR) • Recommendation: Continue operating pumps to failure;
assess the pumps for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess the isolation valves to be sure there is no recirculation.

Sanctuary 3, P1 2
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve does not overlap range
of modeled system curves (high static head conditions not met); measured operating points are very close to the
published performance curve, and far to the left of the published BEP (i.e., outside of the POR).
• Recommendation: Replace the pump.

Sanctuary 3, P2 and P3 4
• Conclusion: Flow demand is not satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve does not overlap range
of modeled system curves (high static head conditions not met); actual operation points measured in field deviate significantly from the published performance curve,
indicative of different pumps altogether.
• Recommendation: Replace the pumps.

Sanctuary 3, P4 2
• Conclusion: Flow demand is met by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of modeled
system curves; measured operating points are very close to the published performance curve, and far to the left of the published BEP (i.e., outside of the POR).
• Recommendation: Continue operating pump to failure.

Mangels, P1 4
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve does not overlap range
of modeled system curves (low static head conditions not met); measured operation points are very close to the
published performance curve, and very close to the
published BEP (i.e., within the POR).

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-15 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 2-7. Pump and System Conclusions and Recommendations Pump Station, Pump No.

General
Scenario Conclusion / Recommendation
• Recommendation: Install VFD and/or pressure controls to better satisfy low static head conditions and run pump to failure; alternatively, replace the pump.

Mangels, P2 4
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve does not overlap range
of modeled system curves (low static head conditions not met); actual operation points measured in field are
significantly lower than the published performance curve, and very close to the published BEP.
• Recommendation: Install VFD and/or pressure controls to better satisfy low static head conditions and run pump to failure; alternatively, replace the pump.

Rolling Hills, P1, P2 and P3 2
• Conclusion: Flow demand is met by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of modeled
system curves; measured operating points are very close to the published performance curve, and very close to the
published BEP.
• Recommendation: Continue operating pumps to failure.

Martin Hill, P1, P2 and P3 2
• Conclusion: Flow demand is met by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of modeled
system curves; measured operating points are very close to the published performance curve, and very close to the
published BEP.
• Recommendation: Continue operating pumps to failure.

Paradise Valley, P1 and P3 2
• Conclusion: Flow demand is met by existing pump
output; pump performance curve overlaps of modeled
system curves; measured operating points are very close to the published performance curve, and far to the left of the published BEP.
• Recommendation: Continue operating pumps to failure.

Paradise Valley, P2 4
• Conclusion: Flow demand is satisfied by existing pump output; pump performance curve overlaps range of
modeled system curves; measured operating points are
significantly lower than the published performance curve, and far to the left of the published BEP.
• Recommendation: Continue operating pump to failure;
assess the pump for wear on the impellers and rotating
parts; assess the isolation valves to be sure there is no recirculation.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-16 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Where pump replacement is being recommended in Table 2-7, the duty point (flow/TDH) should be established, and replacement pump should be specified during design or following a detailed analysis of the hydraulic system and the overall station and pressure zone requirements. Similarly, where it is recommended to continue to run a pump to failure, a design or detailed analysis should also be performed once replacement is warranted.

Since desired pump performance was analyzed based on the City’s hydraulic model which assumes that all valves are not throttled for flow control and most pressure control stations are set at 40 psi (Rancho Solano 4 is set to 25 psi) West Yost recommends a field confirmation of isolation valves immediately downstream of each pump station to confirm if, and how much, valves may be throttled and the actual setting at control stations. Actual valve positioning and pressure control settings should be incorporated into the hydraulic model, new system curves developed, and pump recommendations provided in Table 2-7 confirmed. All pressure control stations should be confirmed. Table 2-8 illustrates the valves immediately downstream of the pump stations that should be investigated for control positioning.

Table 2-8. System Valves Immediately Downstream of Pump Station Facility ID Facility Name Valve ID
ERPS Eastridge Pump Station WGV-15054, WGV-15055, WGV-15079 GRPS Gold Ridge Zone II Pump Station WBV-10610, WGV-14990 MGLPS Upper Mangels Zone II Pump Station WGV-14372, WGV-14373, WGV-18615, WBV-10659 MHPS Martin Hill Zone II Pump Station WGV-12680, WGV-13945, WGV-13953, WGV-14080, WGV-18088
PVPS Paradise Valley Zone II Pump Station WGV-10352, WBV-10084 RHPS Rolling Hills Pump Station WBV-10259, WGV-15139
RSGC Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station N/A
RSRAW Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station WGV-10564, WGV-12441, WGV-12265 RSZ3PS Rancho Solano Zone III Pump Station WGV-15121, WGV-15122, WGV-12258, WGV-12259, WGV-12260
RSZ4 Rancho Solano Zone IV Pump Station WGV-11268, WGV-11269, WGV-11263, WGV-17283, WGV-11270
RSZ5 Rancho Solano Zone V Pump Station WGV-11330, WGV-15045 SANC3 Sanctuary Zone III Pump Station WGV-18447, WGV-15409 SANC4 Sanctuary Zone IV Pump Station WGV-12731, WBV-10230, WGV-15046 SB1 Southbrook Unit 10 Zone II Pump Station #1 WBV-10036, WBV-10066, WBV-10073 SB2 Southbrook Unit 10 Zone II Pump Station #2 WGV-15050, WGV-15051, WGV-19024 SCPS South Cordelia Pump Station WGV-15064
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
2-17 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

2.2.4 Materials Testing
The results of the materials testing for the Rancho Solano Golf Course and Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Stations are presented in Appendix B. Materials evaluated included concrete, metal, and electrical components at the stations.

2.2.4.1 Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station
The concrete tested at Rancho Solano Golf Course was found to be in good condition with little to no corrosion. Sounding was performed on the station’s wall and floor, and no signs of concrete spalling or delamination were observed during the assessment. The metal components and piping tested, excluding the electrical cabinets, were found to have minor to severe corrosion. The electrical cabinets were found to have severe corrosion. Photos 2-1 and 2-2 depict typical corrosion activity of piping/appurtenances and cabinets.

Photo 2-1
Ductile Iron Tee Exhibiting Minor to Severe Corrosion
Photo 2-2
Metal Electrical Cabinet Exhibiting Severe Corrosion

2.2.4.2 Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station
In summary, the concrete surfaces and metal piping assessed were found to be in good condition with little or no corrosion. The discharge piping, pump, and platform had recently been recoated. The coating was in good condition on the interior and exterior piping. The electrical cabinet and metal platform were in good condition with no observed defects. The concrete masonry walls and concrete floors were in good condition.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
3-1 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

3.0 CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
City staff identified the Rolling Hills and Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Stations as having possible electrical performance issues that would require upgrades to mitigate. If electrical upgrades are needed, the City intends to upgrade the electrical capacity to serve pumps sized for future buildout demand conditions.

This chapter describes the assessment performed to estimate future pumping capacity requirements of these facilities.

3.1 Assessment Approach
Pumping capacity is generally evaluated by pressure zone. Sufficient water delivery capacity into each zone should be provided by the City to meet the customer demands within the pressure zone. As shown in Figure 3-1, the Rolling Hills Pump Station, in coordination with the Paradise Valley and Martin Hill Pump Stations, serves Pressure Zone 2D. Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Station, along with Sanctuary 4 Pump Station, serves Pressure Zone 4. Therefore, the capacity of all pump stations serving Pressure Zones 2D and 4 were considered in this analysis.

A comparison of the available pumping capacity to the required future pumping capacity within Pressure Zones 2D and 4 are presented in this chapter. The assessment criteria, including pumping capacity requirements and buildout water demands, are described below.

3.1.1 Pumping Capacity Requirements
Sufficient pumping capacity, in conjunction with water storage reservoirs, should be provided by the City to meet peak customer water demands. As described in Section 3.1, the Rolling Hills and Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Stations serve Pressure Zones 2D and 4, respectively. Pressure Zones 2D and 4 are also served by additional pump stations and storage reservoirs, as shown in Figure 3-1.

Water system pumping capacity should be provided to meet the demands of the pressure zone. For zones with storage reservoirs, sufficient pumping capacity should be provided to meet the maximum day demand for the pressure zone. Water demands in excess of the maximum day demand (e.g., peak hour demand) are assumed to be supplied by the storage reservoirs.

The pump facility capacity analysis should also be conducted assuming the largest booster pump is out of service at each pump station (i.e., firm capacity of the pump station). This assumption ensures reliable deliveries during high demand conditions.

It is generally assumed that all pump stations serving a pressure zone are available to supply the zone.

This condition applies to Pressure Zone 4, which is supplied by both the Rancho Solano 4 and Sanctuary 4 Pump Stations. Based on discussions with the City, Pressure Zone 2D is not equally supplied by all three Zone 2D pump stations. Therefore, Zone 2D should be evaluated by regions of pump station influence— the west side of Zone 2D is primarily served by the Martin Hill Pump Station and the east side of Zone 2D is primarily served by the Rolling Hills and Paradise Valley Pump Stations. The Rolling Hills and Paradise Valley Pump Stations area of influence is assumed to encompass the eastern side of Pressure Zone 2D, with a western boundary running through the single 16-inch pipeline in Hillborn Road, between Sanctuary Drive and Fieldcrest Avenue. The Martin Hill Pump Station is generally unable to influence the areas to the east of this pipeline. Therefore, the pumping capacity analysis for Pressure Zone 2D, to include Rolling Hills Pump Station alone, was conducted for “2D East”.

See
Detail
Map
80 80
680
12 12
12 ERR
GRPS
MGLPS
MGLR
MHPS
MHR
NHR
PVPS
RSPS4
RSR3
RSPS5
RTPS
RHPS
SANC4
SANC3
SCPS
SBPS1
SBPS2
WTMR
RSR4
SCR
ERPS
RSPS3
RHR
CHR
PVR
GRR
WTM
NBR
03,0006,000
ScaleinFeet
Zone2D
West-EastBoundary
Zone2DEast
Zone4
RollingHills
PumpStation
80 RanchoSolano
4Reservoir
RollingHills
Reservoir
Paradise
Valley
Reservoir
Paradise
ValleyPump
Station
RanchoSolano
4Pump
Station
Sanctuary4PumpStation
Figure3-1
ExistingWaterSystem
andPressureZones
CityofFairfield
PotableWaterPumpStation
AssetManagementPlanUpdate
WaterSystem
WaterTreatmentPlant
PumpStation
Reservoir
DistributionPipeline(≤12-inches)
TransmissionPipeline(>12-inches)
PressureZones
Zone1
Zones2A,2B,2C,2D,2E
Zones3A,3B
Zone4
Zone5
DetailMap
PumpStationsEvaluated
PressureZonesEvaluated
WEST YOST - N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\GIS\MXD\Fig3-1_11x17.mxd - ktiano - 12/5/2022 12 37
121
29 1229
29 128
12 680
80 Cordelia
Dixon
Fairfield
Martinez
Napa
Vacaville
Vallejo
DetailMap-Scale:1in=3,000ft
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
3-3 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

3.1.2 Water Demands by Pressure Zone
Pumping capacity requirements are established based on water demands, as described in Section 3.1.1.

Existing water demands within Pressure Zones 2D and 4 were estimated using the City’s water system hydraulic model. Future additional demand expected at buildout was based on input from the City.

Existing and projected buildout water demands are further discussed in this section.

Existing water demands in Pressure Zones 2D and 4 were estimated using spatially located water meter data developed for the hydraulic model. Metered customer water demands were allocated into the hydraulic model in 2017 during hydraulic model development (using 2016 historical demands) and in 2020 during the latest hydraulic model update (using 2019 historical demands). Historical 2019 demands were slightly higher than historical 2016 demands (4 percent and 22 percent, respectively, for Zones 2D and 4). The slight increase in water demand from 2016 to 2019 would be anticipated based on a slight rebound in water consumption following the statewide 2012-2016 drought. Therefore, historical 2019 maximum day water demands of 1,870 gpm in Zone 2D and 450 gpm in Zone 4 were used as the baseline existing water demand for the pumping capacity evaluation.

Planned buildout land uses within Zones 2D and 4 were provided by the City via email on July 5, 2022. Neither zone was noted to have any known future development that should be considered as part of the pumping analysis. Therefore, no additional water demand due to buildout of the Pressure Zones was considered.

3.2 Results
Table 3-1 compares the existing available pumping capacity with the required pumping capacity for Zones 2D (East) and 4. Zone 2D East has an available firm pumping capacity of 5,600 gpm compared to an existing maximum day demand of 1,870 gpm, resulting in a surplus of 3,730 gpm, or approximately 200 percent of excess capacity. Similarly, Zone 4 has an available firm pumping capacity of 797 gpm compared to an existing maximum day demand of 450 gpm, resulting in a surplus of 347 gpm, or approximately 77 percent of excess capacity. As described previously, there is little to no new future development identified in Zones 2D and 4. Therefore, sufficient pumping capacity exists to meet the existing and future buildout demand. No capacity upgrades are recommended until the projected future maximum day demands exceed the surplus capacity presented in Table 3-1.

This capacity evaluation assumes full design performance ability of the existing pumps. The individual pumping capacity presented in Table 3-1 is based on each pump’s design operating point. During discussions with the City, it was noted that the Rolling Hills and Rancho Solano 4 Pump Stations are regularly operating at a lower capacity than is shown in the table. The reduced actual capacity exhibited by the pumps could be due to the pumps not operating near their design points or could be due to reduced efficiency caused by general wear and tear. Causes for and recommendations to improve the reduced pumping capacity are discussed in Chapter 2. Recommendations provided in Chapter 2 should be implemented. If pumps are replaced, a minimum capacity equal to the required pumping capacity noted in Table 3-1 should be provided.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
3-4 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
April 2023
Table 3-1. Existing Pumping Capacities by Pressure Zone and Service Area Pressure Zone
Pump
Station
Pump
Numb
er
Pump
Capacity(a),
gpm
Total
Pumping
Capacity,
gpm
Firm
Pumping
Capacity(
b)
, gpm
Availabl
e
Pumping
Capacity
(c)
, gpm
Required
Pumping
Capacity
(d,e),gpm
Pumping Capacity
Available for Future
Growth
Surplus
(Deficit),
gpm
Surplus,
percent
of
existing
2D East(f)
Paradise
Valley
1 1,400
4,200 2,800
5,600 1,870 3,730 199
2 1,400
3 1,400
Rolling Hills
1 1,400
2 1,400 4,200 2,800
3 1,400
4 Rancho
Solano 4
1 257
514 257
797 450 347 77
2 257
Sanctuary 4
1 270
2 270 1,790 540
3 1,250
(a) Pump capacity corresponds to the design point of each pump. (b) Firm pumping capacity is defined as the total pumping capacity with the largest pump unit at each facility out of service. (c) Available pumping capacity assumes firm pumping capacity at all pump stations. (d) Required pumping capacity is equal to the maximum day demand of the pressure zone (for zones with storage, such as Zones 2D and 4), in addition to the maximum day demand of any pressure zones without storage that are served from the zone (e.g., Zone 4 includes the maximum day demand of the upper Zone 5, which does not have storage). In zones with storage, water demand greater than the maximum day demand (e.g., peak hour demand, fire flows) is drawn from water storage reservoir(s). It is assumed that the City’s Pressure Zone 2D and 4 water storage reservoirs have adequate storage available to serve emergency, fire, and operational storage requirements.
(e) The maximum day demand presented is based on metered average day demand spatial distribution from 2019, scaled to historical (2019) maximum day demand.
(f) Based on discussions with the City, the required pumping capacity for Zone 2D considers only the eastern portion of the pressure zone that is directly served by the Rolling Hills and Paradise Valley Pump Stations. Although the Martin Hill Pump Station also supplies the western portion of Zone 2D, the east and west areas of Zone 2D are only connected by a single 16-inch pipeline in Hillborn Road that isolates each side of the zone. Martin Hill Pump Station is generally unable to influence the areas to the east of this pipeline.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-1 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

4.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
This chapter describes the updated risk assessment that was used to prioritize the replacement or rehabilitation actions for both components and pump stations.

4.1 Methodology
The 2015 risk assessment developed likelihood of failure, consequence of failure, and risk scores for each individual component asset, and each pump station as a whole. During preparation of this AMP Update, the City initiated an update to their Potable Water Master Plan (PUMP), which included condition and risk assessment of other asset types (pipelines, reservoirs, treatment plants). As part of the PUMP Update, a risk assessment methodology was developed, which differed from the 2015 AMP. The City agreed to employ the risk methodology developed during the PUMP Update in this AMP Update1. The general approach is illustrated in Figure 4-1. As indicated in the figure, a rating for both likelihood and consequence of failure was given to each individual component asset (bottom row). The likelihood and consequence of failure methodologies for components as defined in the 2015 risk assessment have been maintained in this AMP Update. The aggregate of the likelihood results from components within a given pump station is then used to determine the likelihood of a pump station failure. Pump station likelihood is then combined with the consequence of failure rating of each pump station to determine a comprehensive risk rating for each pump station as a whole.

Figure 4-1. Pump Station Risk Assessment Methodology
Components and pump stations are then assigned a risk level, from Low to High, based on a risk level matrix. The PUMP Update also refined the City’s risk level matrix from the 2015 AMP; the updated risk level matrix is presented in Figure 4-2.
1 The primary reason for employing the PUMP Update risk approach was that the 2015 AMP study evaluated pump station likelihood of failure using a relative ranking of the components in that pump station compared to all components in all City pump stations. This approach uses a relative ranking and cannot be applied consistently if the set of pump stations being evaluated changes (as it did in this AMP Update compared to the 2015 AMP).

Pump Station Risk
Pump Station Likelihood
Component Risk
Component Likelihood Component Consequence
Pump Station Consequence
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-2 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Figure 4-2. Risk Level Matrix (PUMP Update)
Consequence of Failure Rating
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Likelihood of Failure Rating
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Risk
Level Low MedLow Med MedHigh High
In summary, the changes from the 2015 AMP methodology included in this update are:
• Updated approach for calculating pump station likelihood of failure (details in Section 4.2.3.1).
• The likelihood of failure range for pump stations was 1-5 in the 2015 AMP. This has been changed to a range of 2-10 to align with the PUMP Update. • Revisions to the risk level matrix (Figure 4-2)
• Additional assets included in the assessment (several assets were added to the assessment from facilities in the 2015 AMP, to provide a more comprehensive assessment) For this update, the risk assessment was performed using the framework established in the PUMP Update and results of the 2022 condition assessment efforts. The database model used in 2015 was updated with any new assets or condition information.

Risk results were used to prioritize the rehabilitation, replacement, or maintenance actions to meet established service reliability and performance goals.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-3 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

4.2 Results
The results of the updated risk assessment are presented in the following sections by component and pump station. Appendix C also presents the risk results for each component, by pump station.

4.2.1 Component Risk Levels
Table 4-1 presents the total number of components that fall into each risk level category. The majority of pump station components are Medium-Low risk (43-percent of all assets). The risk results from the 2015 study are not shown because the updated risk results are not directly comparable due to the changes noted earlier.

Table 4-1. Summary of Component Risk Assessment Results Risk Level No. of Components(a) Percent of Total
Low 151 14%
Medium-Low 452 43%
Medium 326 31%
Medium-High 106 10%
High 15 1%
Total 1,050 100%
(a) RSZ4 (2023) was excluded from the total number of components to not duplicate entries from RSZ4

4.2.2 Component Risk Levels by Pump Station
Figure 4-3 shows the percentage of components in each facility that fall within each risk level (colored bars). The presentation of this risk distribution within each pump station provides a helpful comparison between pump stations.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-4 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Figure 4-3. Risk Levels of Assets, Percent of Total

4.2.3 Facility Risk Levels
The risk for each facility was evaluated based on the consequence of failure of the facility, as well as the combined likelihood scores of the components within each facility, as described below.

4.2.3.1 Facility Likelihood
The likelihood of failure for each facility was evaluated using the likelihood of failure scores of individual components within each pump station, weighted by their respective nominal monetary value.

An asset value weight was assigned to each component, as shown in Table 4-2.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-5 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 4-2. Component Value Weighting for Facility Likelihood Calculation Nominal Asset Value, dollars Weight
<$5,000 0.3
$5,000-$20,000 0.7
>$20,000 1.0
This value weighting considers that components of a higher value or importance (e.g., a pump) will have a greater impact on overall facility likelihood of failure than assets of lower value or importance (e.g., a field instrument or sump pump). Overall facility likelihood of failure scores were determined by first weighting the likelihood of failure scores of each individual component using the weighting factors shown in Table 4-2. The resulting weighted likelihood of failure scores for each component were then added together and divided by the sum of the weighting factors. This algorithm produces an overall likelihood of failure score between 2 and 10 for a given facility, in a manner similar to the likelihood of failure scoring for the individual components.

4.2.3.2 Facility Consequence
The consequence of failure of a given facility takes into account the impacts to the system should a that facility fail. Consequence of failure factors from the 2015 AMP were maintained and included: Community Disruption (evaluated by the type of customers in each Zone); and Service Reliability (evaluated based on the ability to meet demand scenarios in an outage/failure). Some consequence of failure scores changed from the 2015 AMP, but most remained the same as there were not significant changes to land use or system configuration/supply. Similar to the scoring for components, facility consequence of failure is rated on a 2 to 10 scale.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-6 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

4.2.3.3 Facility Risk Results
Table 4-3 presents the likelihood of failure, consequence of failure, and risk level results for pump station facilities, ranked from highest to lowest risk level.

Table 4-3. Summary of Facility Risk Assessment Results
Likelihood Score
(2-10)
Consequence
Score
(2-10) Risk Score
Risk Level
(Priority) Facility

6.2 5 31 Medium Rancho Solano Golf Course

4.6 6 27.6 Medium Eastridge

3.8 7 26.6 Medium Goldridge Zone 2

5.2 5 26 Medium Rolling Hills

5.2 5 26 Medium Rancho Solano Raw Water

5.4 4 21.6 Medium Rancho Solano Zone 4

4.6 4 18.4 Medium Upper Mangels Zone 2

4.6 4 18.4 Medium Sanctuary Zone 3

4.6 4 18.4 Medium Sanctuary Zone 4

4.2 5 21 Med-Low Paradise Valley Zone 2

3.4 6 20.4 Med-Low Rancho Solano Zone 5
4 5 20 Med-Low Martin Hill Zone 2

3.6 4 14.4 Med-Low Rancho Solano Zone 3

4.7 3 14.1 Med-Low Southbrook #2

4.3 3 12.9 Med-Low Southbrook #1

4.1 2 8.2 Med-Low South Cordelia
2 4 8 Low Rancho Solano Zone 4 (2023)
(a) Rancho Solano Zone 4 (RSZ4) was rehabilitated in 2023, after publishing of an earlier draft of this report. In certain sections of this report, RSZ4 is presented as ‘RSZ4’, which is the facility pre-rehabilitation and/or as ‘RSZ4 (2023)’, which is the facility after rehabilitation.

Figure 4-4 presents the distribution of facilities graphically within the context of likelihood and consequence of failure scores. The combination of facility likelihood and consequence of failure scores determines the location of the facility within Figure 4-4, and the associated risk level. Detailed facility risk results are provided in Appendix D.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
4-7 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Figure 4-4. Facility Risk Levels
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
5-1 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023

5.0 UPDATED ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter provides recommended improvements based on the assessment results described in the preceding chapters. The action plan matrix developed in 2015 (see Figure 5-1) was used as a guide to identify maintenance, near-term rehabilitation/replacement, or long-term rehabilitation/replacement needs. The condition rating and remaining useful life are used to determine the asset’s physical mortality score; performance rating and maintenance frequency are used to determine the asset’s level of service score. Refer to the 2015 AMP for details on how these ratings are used to determine each score. The action plan for each asset is shown in Appendix C.

Figure 5-1. Action Plan Matrix
Assumptions considered in the development of the Action Plan recommendations include:
• Engineering judgment was employed in the interpretation of Figure 5-1, including but not limited to the pump performance testing and operational analysis presented in Section 2.2. • Components that require replacement of a small piece of the component (e.g., replacement of backup batteries in an MCC; replacement of pipe nipple connecting valve and piping, etc.), were recommended for Increased Maintenance / Operational Adjustments, and details are provided in Appendix C Recommended Improvements.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
5-2 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
• Costs were developed at Class 5 AACE level estimate. Unit costs were reviewed and updated from the 2015 values. Overhead amounts included:
— Construction and installation – 50 percent of material cost (same as 2015) — Administrative, legal, engineering, and construction management contingency of 35% was applied to both the material cost and construction/installation cost (was only applied to material cost in 2015).
— Overhead and profit contingency of 20 percent was applied to both the material cost and construction/installation cost (was only applied to material cost in 2015). — Contingency of 30 percent was applied to both the material cost and construction/installation cost (was only applied to material cost in 2015).

5.1 Recommended 10-Year Rehabilitation/Replacement Program Components that require rehabilitation or replacement were developed into improvement projects by pump station. These requirements consider the recommendations developed in Table 2-7 for replacement of pumps based on performance as well as the risk analysis completed in this section which addresses overall LOF and COF of various facility assets. Table 5-1 presents an optimized program for the next ten years based on the risk levels determined in Section 4 and the Action Plan presented above. The capital program is valued at approximately $8.3M representing approximately $3.0M in asset replacement and approximately $5.3M in rehabilitation.

Asset replacement and corrective action/rehabilitation for each facility are summarized in Table 5-2. Note the recommendations for Rancho Solano Zone 4 are based on the analysis herein, although the City has completed many improvements since the March 2023 failure.

Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 5-1. Recommended 10-Year Replacement and Rehabilitation Program Facility Name
Risk Level,
Score
Action Plan Recommendation
Total Rehab +
Replacement
Cost, dollars
Year
Replacement
Near-Term
Corrective
Action/Rehab
Long-Term
Corrective
Action/Rehab 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Rancho Solano Golf
Course
Medium, 31 $527,250 $0 $486,238 $1,013,488 $1,013,488
Eastridge Medium, 27.6 $118,492 $0 $620,305 $738,797 $738,797 Gold Ridge Zone 2 Medium, 26.6 $60,014 $0 $0 $60,014 $60,014 Rolling Hills Medium, 26 $638,323 $0 $291,571 $929,894 $929,894 Rancho Solano Raw
Water
Medium, 26 $26,973 $0 $106,930 $133,903 $133,903
Rancho Solano Zone 4 Medium, 21.6 $70,600 $22,200 $818,233 $911,033 $911,033 Upper Mangels Zone 2 Medium, 18.4 $93,425 $0 $529,655 $623,080 $623,080 Sanctuary Zone 4 Medium, 18.4 $132,454 $0 $473,935 $606,389 $606,389 Sanctuary Zone 3 Medium, 18.4 $723,653 $0 $12,484 $736,138 $736,138 Paradise Valley Zone 2 Med-Low, 21 $22,385 $0 $25,498 $47,883 $47,883 Rancho Solano Zone 5 Med-Low, 20.4 $7,770 $0 $99,438 $107,208 $107,208 Martin Hill Zone 2 Med-Low, 20 $29,753 $0 $583,373 $613,126 $613,126 Rancho Solano Zone 3 Med-Low, 14.4 $185,000 $0 $83,250 $268,250 $268,250 Southbrook 2 Med-Low, 14.1 $103,568 $0 $553,035 $656,603 $656,603 Southbrook 1 Med-Low, 12.9 $139,120 $0 $540,755 $679,875 $679,875 South Cordelia Med-Low, 8.2 $101,750 $92,500 $0 $194,250 $194,250 Total $2,980,531 $114,700 $5,224,700 $8,319,931 $1,013,488 $798,811 $929,894 $1,044,936 $623,080 $606,389 $891,228 $881,376 $656,603 $679,875 $194,250 Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
5-4 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 5-2. Recommended Rehab/Replacement Program Details Facility Name
Action Plan Recommendation – Asset Details
Replacement
Near-Term
Corrective
Action/Rehab Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehab
Rancho Solano
Golf Course
• Controller
• System Service Panel
• Motor Control Center
• Lighting Panel
• Level Element (x2)
-
• Convenience Receptacles
• Motor Control Center (x2)
• Bladder Tank
• Pressure Relief Valve
• Check Valve (x3)
• Isolation Valve (x4)
Eastridge • Controller
• Surge Protector
• Flow Meter
• Pressure Element
• SCADA - OIT
-
• Air Compressor and control
panel
• MCC
• Convenience Receptacles
• Alarm System
Gold Ridge Zone 2 • Controller
• Pressure Element (x2)
• Lighting
-
Rolling Hills • Controller
• Motor Control Center
• Flow Element
• Pressure Element (x2)
• Lighting (x3)
• Seals
• Pump Control Valve
• Air Valve
-
• Lighting Panel
• Convenience Receptacles
• General Electrical
• Adaptor for Portable Unit
• Alarm System
• Valve
• Isolation Valve (x7)
• Air Valve
• Flow Meter Isolation Valve
Rancho Solano
Raw Water
• Lighting
-
• Lighting Panel
• Convenience Receptacles
• Air Valve
• Check Valve (x4)
• Isolation Valve (x4)
Rancho Solano
Zone 4
• Flow Element
• Pressure Element
• Pumps (x2)
Lighting • Controller
• Motor Control Center
• Lighting Panel
• Convenience Receptacles
• General Electrical
• Adaptor for Portable Unit
• SCADA - OIT
• Isolation Valve (x6)
• Air Valve (x2)
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
5-5 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 5-2. Recommended Rehab/Replacement Program Details Facility Name
Action Plan Recommendation – Asset Details
Replacement
Near-Term
Corrective
Action/Rehab Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehab
Upper Mangels
Zone 2
• Controller
• Coupling (x2)
• Pumps (x2) or install
pump control (VFD or
pressure controls)
- • Motor Control Center
• Lighting Panel
• Convenience Receptacles
• Adaptor for Portable Unit
• Alarm System
• Air Valve (x2)
Sanctuary Zone 3 • Controller
• Motor Control Center
• SCADA – OIT
• Pumps (3)
-
• Air Compressor
• Coupling (x9)
• Surge Protector
• Convenience Receptacles
Sanctuary Zone 4 • Controller
• Coupling
• Pressure Element (x2)
• Lighting
• SCADA – OIT
-
• Air Compressor
• Coupling (x6)
• Motor Control Center
• Surge Protector
• Convenience Receptacles
Paradise Valley
Zone 2
• Controller
• Pressure Element
-
• Coupling (x3)
• Lighting Panel
• Convenience Receptacles
• Adaptor for Portable Unit
Rancho Solano
Zone 5
• Pressure Element (x2)
-
• Reducer
• Generator
Valve
Martin Hill Zone 2 • Controller
• Coupling (x3)
• Pressure Element
• Seals
-
• Motor Control Center
• Lighting Panel
• Alarm System
• Pressure Relief Valve
• Pump Control Valve (x3)
Rancho Solano
Zone 3
• Motor Control Center
-
• SCADA - OIT
Southbrook 2 • Controller
• Coupling (x3)
• SCADA - OIT
-
• Air Compressor and control
panel
• Coupling (x5)
• Motor Control Center
• Surge Protector
• Convenience Receptacles
• Alarm systems
Southbrook 1 • Controller - • Motor Control Center
Potable Water Pump Station
Asset Management Plan Update
N-268-40-22-15-WP-R – AMP Addendum
5-6 City of Fairfield
Potable Water Pump Station – AMP Update
November 2023
Table 5-2. Recommended Rehab/Replacement Program Details Facility Name
Action Plan Recommendation – Asset Details
Replacement
Near-Term
Corrective
Action/Rehab Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehab
• Pressure Element (x2)
• Lighting
• SCADA - OIT
• Surge Protector
• Convenience Receptacles
• General Electrical
South Cordelia • Controller
• SCADA - OIT
• Lighting -

5.2 Recommended Next Steps
The City has proactively implemented the recommendations from the 2015 AMP and will further build upon that progress as they implement recommendations from this update. The following recommendations will allow the City to continue to use this AMP to guide future asset management of the pump stations:
• Complete the evaluation of Rancho Solano 4 pump station catastrophic failure in March 2023 and incorporate these recommendations into its capital rehabilitation planning. • Budget for and implement the replacement and rehabilitation recommendations outlined in this report and summarized in Table 5-1.
• Continue to track condition and performance of assets to develop trends, which will allow the City to make informed maintenance and asset management decisions. • Conduct future updates of the AMP similar to the process undertaken in 2022/2023.

Pump Performance Testing Results
A1: Pump Efficiency Field Data
A2: Pump Curves
A3: Pump and System Curves

Appendix A
Measured Flow
(gpm)
Measured TDH
(ft) Nameplate GPM Nameplate TDH Voltage (V) Amps
Reported Motor
Efficiency
Reported Overall
Efficiency Power Factor
Calculated Pump
Efficiency
Nameplate
Horsepower
Calculated Motor
Horsepower Input
Calculated Motor
kW Input
Calculated Motor
Horsepower
Output
(should equal
pump brake HP)
Calculated Pump
Efficiency from
Motor Output
Service Zone Pump Key-in from PDF Key-in from PDF Photos/City Photos/City Average from Spreadsheet
Average from
Spreadsheet
Key-in from
Spreadsheet Key-in from PDF Key-in from Spreadsheet
(Reported Overall
Efficiency) /
(Reported Motor
Efficiency)
Key-in from PDF
Amps * V * sq
rt(3) / 0.7457 /
1000 * PF
HP * 0.7457
Calculated Motor
Horsepower Input
* Reported Motor
Efficiency
gpm * TDH / 3960
/ Calculated
Motor
Horsepower
Output
(Ideal range: 0.7-

0.85, should not
be over 1)
ZONE 1
South Cordelia P1 1901 25 1900 42.5 484.3 32.00 0.93 0.44 0.77 0.47 30.00 27.72 20.67 25.78 0.47 South Cordelia P2 1957 23 1900 42.5 480.3 33.00 0.94 0.38 0.80 0.41 30.00 29.45 21.96 27.57 0.41 South Cordelia P3 1972 23 1900 42.5 480.7 32.33 0.94 0.40 0.78 0.43 30.00 28.15 20.99 26.35 0.43 ZONE 2
Gold Ridge P1 960 95 1000 100 482.7 39.70 0.93 0.68 0.75 0.73 40.00 33.38 24.89 31.04 0.74 Gold Ridge P2 942 95 1000 100 484.3 40.20 0.93 0.67 0.75 0.72 40.00 33.92 25.29 31.54 0.72 Gold Ridge P3 914 95 1000 100 482.7 39.30 0.93 0.67 0.74 0.72 40.00 32.60 24.31 30.32 0.72 Gold Ridge P4 1373 104 1385 110 481.3 59.47 0.95 0.65 0.84 0.69 50.00 55.85 41.64 52.77 0.68 Mangels P1 295 150 360 137 485.0 18.33 0.89 0.67 0.79 0.75 20.00 16.31 12.16 14.49 0.77 Mangels P2 292 148 360 137 490.7 19.00 0.89 0.66 0.77 0.74 20.00 16.67 12.43 14.81 0.74 Martin Hill P1 1121 129 1400 114.6 483.0 52.33 0.95 0.40 0.87 0.42 50.00 51.08 38.09 48.27 0.76 Martin Hill P2 1140 141 1400 114.6 480.7 53.33 0.95 0.78 0.87 0.83 50.00 51.80 38.63 48.95 0.83 Martin Hill P3 1066 139 1400 114.6 479.3 51.33 0.95 0.75 0.87 0.79 50.00 49.72 37.08 46.99 0.80 Paradise Valley P1 739 123 1400 106 494.0 51.03 0.91 0.59 0.66 0.65 50.00 38.65 28.82 35.17 0.65 Paradise Valley P2 700 125 1400 106 493.7 51.17 0.91 0.57 0.66 0.63 50.00 38.72 28.88 35.24 0.63 Paradise Valley P3 804 127 1400 106 488.7 45.53 0.95 0.68 0.74 0.72 50.00 38.24 28.52 36.14 0.71 Rolling Hills P1 1010 129 1400 115 487.7 51.07 0.92 0.684 0.84 0.74 50.00 48.59 36.23 44.70 0.74 Rolling Hills P2 1048 129 1400 115 486.0 52.27 0.92 0.705 0.83 0.77 50.00 48.97 36.52 45.05 0.76 Rolling Hills P3 965 129 1400 115 484.7 51.03 0.93 0.684 0.80 0.74 50.00 45.96 34.27 42.74 0.74 Southbrook 1 P1 345 90 450 100 488.0 17.40 0.93 0.56 0.73 0.60 20.00 14.40 10.74 13.39 0.59 Southbrook 1 P2 360 97 450 100 485.3 17.70 0.93 0.61 0.72 0.66 20.00 14.37 10.71 13.36 0.66 Southbrook 1 P3 221 99 450 100 485.0 15.87 0.93 0.46 0.67 0.49 20.00 11.98 8.93 11.14 0.50 Southbrook 1 P4 872 116 1250 90 487.0 40.93 0.95 0.69 0.81 0.73 40.00 37.50 27.97 35.44 0.72 Southbrook 2 P1 328 99 450 105 486.0 17.50 0.93 0.56 0.78 0.60 20.00 15.41 11.49 14.33 0.57 Southbrook 2 P2 448 81 450 105 485.3 19.17 0.93 0.54 0.79 0.58 20.00 17.07 12.73 15.87 0.58 Southbrook 2 P3 412 81 450 105 484.7 19.27 0.93 0.51 0.78 0.55 20.00 16.92 12.62 15.73 0.54 Southbrook 2 P4 962 81 1250 100 483.7 46.53 0.95 0.45 0.83 0.48 40.00 43.39 32.36 41.00 0.48 ZONE 3
Eastridge P1 215 157 180 195 489.7 14.60 0.92 0.57 0.91 0.62 20.00 15.11 11.27 13.90 0.61 Eastridge P2 190 157 180 195 485.0 14.87 0.92 0.49 0.91 0.53 20.00 15.24 11.36 14.02 0.54 Eastridge P3 210 159 180 195 486.7 14.70 0.92 0.56 0.91 0.61 20.00 15.12 11.28 13.91 0.61 Eastridge P4 1194 185 1250 195 484.7 87.00 0.95 0.71 0.80 0.74 100.00 78.35 58.43 74.75 0.75 Rancho Solano Zone 3 P1 530 240 705 245 483.3 48.63 0.94 0.61 0.97 0.65 60.00 52.96 39.49 49.84 0.64 Rancho Solano Zone 3 P2 525 226 705 245 482.0 52.40 0.94 0.57 0.89 0.61 60.00 52.21 38.93 49.13 0.61 Rancho Solano Zone 3 P3 555 231 705 245 479.3 52.63 0.94 0.62 0.89 0.66 60.00 52.15 38.89 49.08 0.66 Sanctuary Zone 3 P1 306 113 425 115 487.7 17.47 0.93 0.62 0.71 0.67 20.00 14.05 10.47 13.06 0.67 Sanctuary Zone 3 P2 211 88 425 115 485.3 16.27 0.93 0.38 0.67 0.41 20.00 12.29 9.16 11.43 0.41 Sanctuary Zone 3 P3 211 88 425 115 485.3 14.27 0.93 0.38 0.67 0.41 20.00 10.78 8.04 10.02 0.47 Sanctuary Zone 3 P4 786 129 1250 115 485.0 46.50 0.95 0.62 0.8 0.66 50.00 41.91 31.25 39.60 0.65 ZONE 4
Rancho Solano Zone 4 P1 184 194 257 208.3 33.50 0.91 0.61 0.90 0.67 15.00 14.59 10.88 13.28 0.68 Rancho Solano Zone 4 P2 249 194 257 207.7 38.83 0.91 0.71 0.91 0.78 15.00 17.05 12.71 15.51 0.79 Sanctuary Zone 4 P1 671 147 270 135 483.0 146.37 0.87 0.6 0.8 0.69 15.00 131.36 97.96 114.68 0.22 Sanctuary Zone 4 P2 236 132 270 135 489.0 13.07 0.92 0.6 0.88 0.65 15.00 13.06 9.74 12.02 0.65 Sanctuary Zone 4 P3 671 148 1250 124 483.0 46.37 0.95 0.6 0.8 0.63 50.00 41.61 31.03 39.33 0.64 ZONE 5
Rancho Solano Zone 5 P1 75 116 53.27 180 159.3 13.83 0.83 0.53 0.81 0.64 5.00 4.15 3.09 3.44 0.64 Rancho Solano Zone 5 P2 65 132 53.27 180 159.3 13.87 0.83 0.52 0.81 0.63 5.00 4.16 3.10 3.45 0.63 Rancho Solano Zone 5 P3 65 136 53.27 180 159.3 14.07 0.83 0.54 0.81 0.65 5.00 4.22 3.14 3.50 0.64

OTHER PUMP STATIONS
Rancho Solano Golf Course P1 1446 270 1300 145 483.3 136.67 0.93 0.67 0.98 0.72 125.00 150.36 112.12 139.83 0.71 Rancho Solano Golf Course P2 1300 309 750 481.0 132.00 0.93 0.71 0.97 0.76 125.00 143.05 106.67 133.04 0.76 Rancho Solano Golf Course P3 679 316 500 481.7 78.00 0.91 0.65 0.95 0.72 60.00 82.90 61.82 75.03 0.72 Rancho Solano Raw Water P1 424 153 600 176 480.7 31.70 0.90 0.57 0.82 0.63 40.00 29.02 21.64 26.21 0.63 Rancho Solano Raw Water P2 525 155 600 176 483.7 34.07 0.90 0.65 0.83 0.72 40.00 31.77 23.69 28.53 0.72 Rancho Solano Raw Water P3 449 153 600 176 484.0 27.73 0.90 0.71 0.79 0.79 40.00 24.63 18.37 22.12 0.78 Rancho Solano Raw Water P4 190 153 200 158 484.3 13.80 0.90 0.65 0.72 0.73 15.00 11.18 8.34 10.00 0.73 N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\01_SCPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 9:21 AMtnewman City of Fairfield South Cordelia Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND 2015 Pumps 2 and 3 Actual Operation Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\02_GRPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 10:41 AMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (1000 gpm @ 100' TDH, used in 2015) 2. Curve B is based on the nameplate impeller diameter for Pumps 1-3 (10.69"). 3. Pump 4 nameplate indicates 12.09" impeller diameter and duty point of 1385 gpm @ 110' TDH. Pump 4 has a different CAT# than Pumps 1-3. City has indicated the impeller has been trimmed. Additional pump curve may be needed.

City of Fairfield
Gold Ridge Pump Station
Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation
Appendix X
Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2015 Pump 4 No Data 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 4 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1)
Curve B (see note 2)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\03_MGPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 9:22 AMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Mangels Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Pumps 1 and 2 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-2 (360 gpm @ 137' TDH, used in 2015) and is consistent with nameplate impellar diameter (6.7") Curve A (see note 1)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\04_MHPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 10:34 AMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Martin Hill Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pumps 2 and 3 Actual Operation
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2015 Pump 1 and 3 Retest 2015 Pump 2 Retest 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (1400 gpm @ 114.6' TDH, used in 2015) and is consistent with nameplate impeller diameter (12.1") Curve A (see note 1)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\05_PVPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/14/2022 8:17 AMtnewman 2015 Pumps 1-3 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Paradise Valley Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis. 2. Curve B is based on the nameplate impeller diameter for Pumps 1-4 (11.6") and is consistent with nameplate duty point (1400 gpm @ 106' TDH).

Curve A (see note 1)
Curve B (see note 2)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\06_RHPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 1:42 PMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (1400 gpm @ 115' TDH, used in 2015) and is consistent with nameplate impeller diameter (12.1") Curve A (see note 1)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\07_SBPS1 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 1:42 PMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Southbrook 1 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (450 gpm @ 100' TDH, used in 2015) and is consistent with nameplate impeller diameter (10.17") Curve A (see note 1)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\07_SBPS1 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 1:42 PMtnewman 2015 Pump 4 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Southbrook 1 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Pump 4 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 4 Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pump 4 (1250 gpm @ 90' TDH, used in 2015) and is consistent with nameplate impeller diameter (11")
Curve A (see note 1)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\08_SBPS2 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 10:34 AMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pumps 2 and 3 Actual Operation
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Southbrook 2 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (450 gpm @ 105' TDH, used in 2015) and is consistent with nameplate impeller diameter (10.3")
Curve A (see note 1)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\08_SBPS2 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 10:34 AMtnewman 2015 Pump 4 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Southbrook 2 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Pump 4 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 4 Actual Operation
Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis. 2. Curve B is based on the nameplate duty point for Pump 4 (1250 gpm @ 100' TDH). Curve B (see note 2) B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\09_ERPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 1:17 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Eastridge Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND 2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation (Retest) Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Notes: 1. Curve A was used in the 2015 analysis. 2. Curve B is based on the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (180 gpm @ 195' TDH). Pumps 1-3 are 10-stage vertical turbine pumps; accordingly, measured TDH values should be divided by 10 in order to be plotted in this graph.

Curve A (see note 1)
2015 Measured Duty:Q = 156 gpm TDH = 208 ft 2015 Measured Duty: Q = 146 gpm TDH = 222.2 ft 2015 Measured Duty: Q = 146 gpm TDH = 192 ft 2015 Data Replotted (see note 2)
Curve B (see note 2)
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\09_ERPS Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 1:25 PMtnewman 2015 Pump 4 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Pump 4 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 4 Actual Operation
Eastridge Pump Station
Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation
Nameplate indicates this
pump model is 12JKH(3-stage) VTP. Nameplate
duty point is 1250 gpm @ 195' TDH.

B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\10_RSPS3 Pump Curves.dwg 10/5/2022 12:07 PMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Rancho Solano 3 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve
2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis. 2. Curve B is based on the nameplate duty point for Pump 4 (1250 gpm @ 100' TDH) and nameplate impeller diameter (8.3") Curve B (see note 2) B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\11_SANCPS3 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 2:15 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Sanctuary 3 Pump Station
Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation
2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND 2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation Pumps 1, 2 and 3 Nameplate Curve2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis and is consistent with the nameplate duty point for Pumps 1-3 (425 gpm @ 115' TDH) and nameplate impeller diameter (10.6")
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\11_SANCPS3 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 2:15 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Sanctuary 3 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 4 Actual Operation LEGEND 2015 Pump 4 (Retest) Pump 4 Nameplate Curve 2022 Pump 4 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis and is consistent with the nameplate duty point for Pump 4 (1250 gpm @ 115' TDH) and nameplate impeller diameter (11.8")
B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\12_RSPS4 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 2:44 PMtnewman 2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND City of Fairfield Rancho Solano 4 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Pumps 1 and 2 Nameplate Curve
2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis and is consistent with nameplate impeller diameter for Pumps 1 and 2 (6.8"). 2. Nameplate data for Pumps 1 and 2 does not include duty point flow or TDH.

B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\13_SANCPS4 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 3:14 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Sanctuary 4 Pump Station
Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation
2015 Pumps 1 and 2 Actual Operation LEGEND Pumps 1 and 2 Nameplate Curve 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation
Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis and is consistent with Pumps 1 and 2 nameplate duty point (270 gpm @ 135' TDH) and nameplate impeller diameter (6.10"). 2. 2022 measured flow and TDH for Pump 1, as shown, do not fall near the pump curve.

B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\13_SANCPS4 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 3:14 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Sanctuary 4 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation LEGEND Pump 3 Nameplate Curve 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis and is consistent with Pump 3 nameplate duty point (1250 gpm @ 124' TDH) and nameplate impeller diameter (12.10").

B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\14_RSPS5 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 3:25 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
Rancho Solano 5 Pump Station
Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation
2015 Pump 1 Actual Operation LEGEND 2015 Pump 2 Actual Operation Pumps 1 and 2 Nameplate Curve 2015 Pump 1 Retest 2015 Pump 2 Retest 2022 Pump 1 Actual Operation 2022 Pump 2 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis. 2. New Grundfos pumps were installed since 2015. Associated pump curves are needed for updating the analysis.

B
N:\Clients\268 Fairfield\40-22-15 Fairfield PS AMP Update\CAD\Figures\14_RSPS5 Pump Curves.dwg 10/6/2022 3:25 PMtnewman City of Fairfield Rancho Solano 5 Pump Station Pump Curve vs. Actual Operation Appendix X Pump Station Asset Management Plan Update
2015 Pump 3 Actual Operation LEGEND 2015 Pump 3 Retest Pump 3 Nameplate Curve 2022 Pump 3 Actual Operation Curve A (see note 1) Notes: 1. Curve A was used in 2015 analysis. 2. New Grundfos pumps were installed since 2015. Associated pump curves are needed for updating the analysis.

B
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/14/2023
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
0 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 1.A. Fairfield - Zone 4 System Curves: Rancho Solano 4 Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate Flow/TDH Blank; BEP 80% at 310 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
Maximum TDH Assumptions:
- Average Day Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS off
> Sanctuary 3 PS off
- Reservoirs
> Rancho Solano 4 Res. at max level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at min level
Minimum TDH Assumptions:
- Peak Hour Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS on
> Sanctuary 3 PS on
- Reservoirs
> Ranch Solano 4 Res. at min level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at max level
Test 3: Isolation valve wide
open, amperage running
outside service factor
Test 1: Pump throttled when assessor
arrived to facility (to avoid amperage
outside service factor of 1.15%)
Test 2
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/14/2023
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
0 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 1.B. Fairfield - Zone 4 System Curves: Rancho Solano 4 Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate Flow/TDH Blank; BEP 80% at 310 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
Maximum TDH Assumptions:
- Average Day Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS off
> Sanctuary 3 PS off
- Reservoirs
> Rancho Solano 4 Res. at max level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at min level
Minimum TDH Assumptions:
- Peak Hour Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS on
> Sanctuary 3 PS on
- Reservoirs
> Ranch Solano 4 Res. at min level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at max level
Test 3: Isolation valve wide
open, amperage running
outside service factor Test 1: Pump throttled when assessor arrived to facility (to avoid amperage
outside service factor of 1.15%)
Test 2
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/4/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 2.A. Fairfield - Zone 4 System Curves: Sanctuary 4 Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate 270 gpm @ 135' TDH; BEP 77% @ 280 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
Maximum TDH Assumptions:
- Average Day Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS off
> Sanctuary 3 PS off
- Reservoirs
> Rancho Solano 4 Res. at max level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at min level
Minimum TDH Assumptions:
- Peak Hour Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS on
> Sanctuary 3 PS on
- Reservoirs
> Ranch Solano 4 Res. at min level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at max level
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/4/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 2.B. Fairfield - Zone 4 System Curves: Sanctuary 4 Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate 270 gpm @ 135' TDH; BEP 77% @ 280 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
Maximum TDH Assumptions:
- Average Day Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS off
> Sanctuary 3 PS off
- Reservoirs
> Rancho Solano 4 Res. at max level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at min level
Minimum TDH Assumptions:
- Peak Hour Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS on
> Sanctuary 3 PS on
- Reservoirs
> Ranch Solano 4 Res. at min level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at max level
BEP

X-XXX-XX-XX-XX-X-XXXXX
Client Name
Project Title
Last Revised: xx-xx-xx
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 2.C. Fairfield - Zone 4 System Curves: Sanctuary 4 Pump Station (Pump 3) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 3 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1250 gpm @ 124' TDH; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 3 - Measured Points
Pump 3 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
Maximum TDH Assumptions:
- Average Day Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS off
> Sanctuary 3 PS off
- Reservoirs
> Rancho Solano 4 Res. at max level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at min level
Minimum TDH Assumptions:
- Peak Hour Demand
- Pump Stations
> Rancho Solano 4 PS off
> Sanctuary 4 PS off
> Rancho Solano 3 PS on
> Sanctuary 3 PS on
- Reservoirs
> Ranch Solano 4 Res. at min level
> Rancho Solano 3 Res. at max level
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/5/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 3.A. Fairfield - Zone 3B System Curves: Sanctuary 3 Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate 425 gpm @ 115' TDH; BEP 77% at 450 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/5/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 3.B. Fairfield - Zone 3B System Curves: Sanctuary 3 Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate 425 gpm @ 115' TDH; BEP 77% at 450 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 4/5/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 3.C. Fairfield - Zone 3B System Curves: Sanctuary 3 Pump Station (Pump 3) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 3 - Published Curve (Nameplate 425 gpm @ 115' TDH; BEP 77% at 450 gpm) Pump 3 - Measured Points
Pump 3 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP

X-XXX-XX-XX-XX-X-XXXXX
Client Name
Project Title
Last Revised: xx-xx-xx
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 4.C. Fairfield - Zone 3B System Curves: Rancho Solano 3 Pump Station (Pump 3) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 3 - Published Curve (Nameplate 705 gpm @ 245' TDH; BEP 79% at 800 gpm) Pump 3 - Measured Points
Pump 3 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 5.A. Fairfield - Zone 2C System Curves: Mangels Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate 360 gpm @ 137' TDH; BEP 76% at 300 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 5.B. Fairfield - Zone 2C System Curves: Mangels Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate 360 gpm @ 137' TDH; BEP 76% at 300 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 6.A. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Rolling Hills Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate Flow/TDH Blank; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 6.B. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Rolling Hills Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 115' TDH; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 6.C. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Rolling Hills Pump Station (Pump 3) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 3 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 115' TDH; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 3 - Measured Points
Pump 3 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 7.A. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Martin Hill Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 114.6' TDH; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 7.B. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Martin Hill Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 114.6' TDH; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 7.C. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Martin Hill Pump Station (Pump 3) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 3 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 114.6' TDH; BEP 86% at 1200 gpm) Pump 3 - Measured Points
Pump 3 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 8.A. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Paradise Valley Pump Station (Pump 1) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 1 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 106' TDH; BEP 86% at 1150 gpm) Pump 1 - Measured Points
Pump 1 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 8.B. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Paradise Valley Pump Station (Pump 2) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 2 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 106' TDH; BEP 86% at 1150 gpm) Pump 2 - Measured Points
Pump 2 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Fairfield System Curves-tn.xlsm
City of Fairfield
Pump Station AMP Update
Last Revised: 3/23/2023
0 40
80 120
160
200
240
280
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), feet
Flow, gpm
Figure 8.C. Fairfield - Zone 2D System Curves: Paradise Valley Pump Station (Pump 3) Maximum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Minimum TDH System Curve (Modeled)
Pump 3 - Published Curve (Nameplate 1400 gpm @ 106' TDH; BEP 86% at 1150 gpm) Pump 3 - Measured Points
Pump 3 - Measured Curve (Fitted)
BEP
Materials Testing Results

Appendix B
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano
Golf Course and Raw Water Pump
Stations
City of Fairfield
Prepared for: Mike Zacharia, PE
Principal Engineer
West Yost
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 95833
Date: August 3, 2022
Prepared by:

V&A Project No. 22-0005
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Table of Contents V&A Project No. 22-0005 i
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i Tables ............................................................................................................................................... ii Figures .............................................................................................................................................. ii Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................. iii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Approach........................................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 Visual Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 2

2.1.1 VANDA® Concrete Condition Index ..................................................................................... 3

2.1.2 VANDA® Metal Condition Index .......................................................................................... 4

2.2 Concrete Assessment Methods ................................................................................................... 5

2.2.1 Sounding ........................................................................................................................... 5

2.3 Metal Assessment Methods ........................................................................................................ 5

2.3.1 Ultrasonic Testing.............................................................................................................. 5

2.3.2 Dry Film Thickness ............................................................................................................ 6 3 Results.............................................................................................................................................. 7

3.1 Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station .................................................................................. 7

3.1.1 Visual Assessment............................................................................................................. 7

3.1.2 Ultrasonic Thickness Testing ............................................................................................. 9

3.1.3 Condition Summary .........................................................................................................11

3.1.4 Recommendations...........................................................................................................11

3.2 Rancho Solano Raw Water PS ...................................................................................................12

3.2.1 Visual Assessment...........................................................................................................12

3.2.2 Ultrasonic Thickness Testing ...........................................................................................13

3.2.3 Condition Summary .........................................................................................................14

3.2.4 Recommendations...........................................................................................................14 Appendix A UT Locations and Data ....................................................................................................... A-1 Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Table of Contents V&A Project No. 22-0005 ii
Tables
Table 2-1. VANDA® Concrete Condition Index............................................................................................................ 3 Table 2-2. VANDA® Metal Condition Index ................................................................................................................. 4 Table 3-1. Summary of Defects Observed at the Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station ................................ 9 Table 3-2. UT Summary Data for Rancho Solano Golf Course PS Piping ...............................................................10 Table 3-3. Rancho Solano Golf Course DFT Summary ............................................................................................11 Table 3-4. Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station Condition Summary ...........................................................11 Table 3-5. UT Summary Data for the Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station Piping........................................13 Table 3-6. Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station DFT Summary......................................................................13 Table 3-7. Raw Water Pump Station Condition Summary.......................................................................................14 Figures
Figure 1-1. General Location of the Rancho Solano Pump Stations ........................................................................ 1 Table 2-1. VANDA® Concrete Condition Index............................................................................................................ 3 Table 2-2. VANDA® Metal Condition Index ................................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2-1. Clock Positions on Pipe Looking Downstream........................................................................................ 5 Table 3-1. Summary of Defects Observed at the Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station ................................ 9 Table 3-2. UT Summary Data for Rancho Solano Golf Course PS Piping ...............................................................10 Table 3-3. Rancho Solano Golf Course DFT Summary ............................................................................................11 Table 3-4. Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station Condition Summary ...........................................................11 Table 3-5. UT Summary Data for the Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station Piping........................................13 Table 3-6. Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station DFT Summary......................................................................13 Table 3-7. Raw Water Pump Station Condition Summary.......................................................................................14 Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 iii
Abbreviations and
Acronyms
Abbreviations/Acronyms Definition
ACI.............................................American Concrete Institute AMPP.........................................Association for Materials Protection and Performance ANSI ..........................................American National Standards Institute ASTM.........................................American Society for Testing and Materials AWWA ........................................American Water Works Association AVG. ..........................................Average
DIP ............................................Ductile Iron Pipe DIRECT. .....................................Direction
FT. .............................................Feet
HSS ...........................................Hollow Structural Sections IN. .............................................Inch
MAX...........................................Maximum
MIN. ..........................................Minimum
NACE .........................................NACE is now Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
DFT............................................Dry Film Thickness UT..............................................Ultrasonic Thickness N/A ...........................................Not applicable PSI ............................................Pounds per square inch PS ............................................. Pump Station V&A ...........................................V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

VANDA® .....................................V&A Condition Index WS.............................................Welded Steel WTP...........................................Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Introduction V&A Project No. 22-0005 1
1 Introduction
V&A Consulting Engineers (V&A) was retained by West Yost & Associates (West Yost) to perform a condition assessment of two water pump stations (PS) within Rancho Solano, in Fairfield, California.

Figure 1-1 shows an aerial map with the locations of the two pump stations.

The condition assessment is part of a follow-up study performed by West Yost in 2015. The Rancho Solano Golf Course (Golf Course PS) and Raw Water Pump Stations (Raw Water PS) were originally not owned by the City at the time of the study. Now that the City has taken over ownership of these facilities, the City is in need of establishing a baseline condition of the two pump stations.

The Raw Water Pump Station was constructed in 1988 and has undergone multiple rehabilitation of the pump system. The Golf Course Pump Station was constructed circa 1990.

Figure 1-1. General Location of the Rancho Solano Pump Stations Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Approach V&A Project No. 22-0005 2
2 Approach

2.1 Visual Assessment
Qualitative visual evaluations were conducted from inside and outside of the pump stations, focusing on the condition of concrete surfaces and piping. Cracks, delamination, corrosion, and other concrete defects referenced in American Concrete Institute (ACI) 201.1R-92, “Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete in Service” were documented with digital, still photographs. The condition of metal components and coatings were also evaluated and documented. Much of the visual assessment data is subjective and is based upon V&A’s extensive experience evaluating concrete and metallic structures in the water and wastewater industries. Standardized ratings used to characterize condition were assigned based on the VANDA Concrete and Metal Condition Indices, as shown in the subsequent sections.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Approach V&A Project No. 22-0005 3

2.1.1 VANDA® Concrete Condition Index
V&A created the VANDA Concrete Condition Index (Table 2-1) to provide consistent reporting of corrosion damage based on objective criteria. Concrete condition is rated from Level 1 to Level 5 based upon field observations and measurements, with Level 1 indicating the best case and Level 5 indicating severe damage. The individual criteria are applied based on engineering judgment to arrive at the overall rating.

Table 2-1. VANDA® Concrete Condition Index
Condition
Rating Description
Representative
Photograph
Level 1 Little or no damage to concrete
▪ Hardness............... hard surface
▪ Surface profile ...... smooth, apparently intact
▪ Cracks ................... hairline width, minimal frequency ▪ Spalling ................. none
▪ Reinforcement ...... not exposed or damaged
Level 2 Minor surface damage
▪ Hardness............... soft surface layer to 1/8-inch depth ▪ Surface profile ...... fine aggregate exposed
▪ Cracks ................... hairline width, moderate frequency ▪ Spalling ................. shallow spalling, minimal frequency ▪ Reinforcement ...... not exposed or damaged
Level 3 Moderate surface damage
▪ Hardness............... soft surface layer to 1/4-inch depth ▪ Surface profile ...... large aggregate exposed or protruding ▪ Cracks ................... up to 1/32-inch width, moderate frequency ▪ Spalling ................. shallow spalling, minimal frequency ▪ Reinforcement ...... exposed; minor damage, minimal frequency Level 4 Loss of concrete mortar and damage to reinforcement ▪ Hardness............... soft paste beyond 1/4-inch depth ▪ Surface profile ...... large aggregate exposed, loose, or missing ▪ Cracks ................... 1/8- to 1/4-inch width, moderate frequency ▪ Spalling ................. deep spalling, moderate frequency ▪ Reinforcement ...... exposed with damage, moderate frequency Level 5 Bulk loss of concrete and reinforcement
▪ Hardness............... soft paste beyond 1-inch depth ▪ Surface profile ...... large aggregate exposed, loose, or missing ▪ Cracks ................... over 1/2-inch width, or narrower and frequent ▪ Spalling ................. deep spalling, high frequency ▪ Reinforcement ...... consumed; loss of structural integrity © 2020 V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Approach V&A Project No. 22-0005 4

2.1.2 VANDA® Metal Condition Index
V&A created the VANDA Metal Condition Index (Table 2-2) to provide consistent reporting of corrosion damage based on objective criteria. Metal condition is rated from Level 1 to Level 5 based upon field observations and measurements, with Level 1 indicating the best case and Level 5 indicating severe damage. The individual criteria are applied based on engineering judgment to arrive at the overall rating.

Table 2-2. VANDA® Metal Condition Index
Condition
Rating Description
Representative
Photograph
Level 1 Little or no corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general ......none
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........none to minimal
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........may be widespread but superficial Level 2 Minor corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general ......up to 20%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........up to 20%
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........localized
Level 3 Moderate corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general ......20% to 40%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........20% to 60%
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........up to half of surface Level 4 Severe corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general ......40% to 60%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........60% to 100% (pinholes) ▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........most of surface
Level 5 Failure or imminent failure
▪ Wall thickness loss, general ......greater than 60%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........100% (holes)
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........most or all of surface © 2020 V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Approach V&A Project No. 22-0005 5

2.2 Concrete Assessment Methods

2.2.1 Sounding
Sounding was performed within the structures at the evaluator’s discretion to investigate for shallow, subsurface discontinuities. Using a hammer to strike accessible concrete surfaces, the sound can indicate if defects such as voids, delamination, or honeycombing are present. The sound returned from solid concrete without subsurface discontinuities is a sharp “ping” noise. A “hollow” sound generally means that a discontinuity exists beneath the sounding location. A soft “thud” typically results from deteriorated concrete.

2.3 Metal Assessment Methods

2.3.1 Ultrasonic Testing
Ultrasonic testing (UT) is a non-destructive evaluation technique used for the determination of metal wall thickness. High-frequency sound waves are transmitted through one side of a metal wall from a transducer. When the sound waves reach the other side of the metal wall, a fraction of the waves will echo back to the transducer. The metal thickness is determined by recording the time it takes for the sound wave to travel through the metal and return.

A-scan point measurements were performed for various metal structures and piping. For pipes, measurements were made around the pipe circumference and were referenced to clock positions (e.g., 12:00, 3:00, 6:00, or 9:00) viewed in the downstream direction (Figure 2-1).

If pitting or extremely localized corrosion is found, a pit depth gauge will be used since UT will not provide acceptable readings due to the rough surface.

Figure 2-1. Clock Positions on Pipe Looking
Downstream

To determine the amount of corrosion that has occurred from UT data, the original measured thickness of the pipe must be known. The thickness measurements recorded to assess corrosion can then be compared against the original thickness measurements. For this project, the original thickness of the piping, based on the measurements was unknown; so the original wall thickness was determined using the following procedure:

1. Group the thickness readings by the specified pipe for the process area, material, diameter, and service.
12:00
6:00
9:00 3:00
10:30 1:30
7:30 4:30
Downstream View
Pipe Cross Section
12:00
6:00
9:00 3:00
10:30 1:30
7:30 4:30
Downstream View
Pipe Cross Section
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Approach V&A Project No. 22-0005 6

2. Visually exclude outliers above the top of the core grouping of thickness measurements. These may be anomalous measurements that are slightly thicker than the typical original thickness of the pipe.

3. Assume that the consistent thickness readings that remain reflect the original thickness of the metal.
a. For steel pipes, the standard thickness from ANSI B36.10was used as the nominal thickness. b. For cast and ductile iron pipe, if the pipe was not marked with the class or specified in the contract documents, the nominal thickness that was assumed based on the nearest standard average thickness per ANSI/AWWA C150/A21.5. For grooved end pipe with couplings, the limitations of AWWA C115 (i.e., minimum Class 53) were also applied to the nominal thickness selection
The specific nominal thickness and tolerance selected for each test location are shown with the UT testing results. It should be noted that if the measured thicknesses are within the tolerances that were likely to have been applied during the manufacture of the piping, thickness measurements below nominal are not necessarily an indication of corrosion and may be considered minor corrosion.

To an extent, this method implies that the internal corrosion is non-uniform across the surfaces so that the difference between the maximum thickness measurements and the minimum thickness measurements is representative of corrosion rate due to pitting or otherwise localized corrosion.

2.3.2 Dry Film Thickness
Dry film thickness (DFT) is the thickness of a coating or lining after it has cured. A DFT gauge uses electromagnetic induction or eddy current technology to measure the thickness of a wide variety of coatings on metal surfaces. V&A used a gauge that can measure coatings up to 0.2 inches (2 00 mils) in thickness, and the gauge was calibrated using shims prior to the collection of data. Measurements were taken on metallic components in the same manner as described for ultrasonic testing in Section 2.3.1.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 7
3 Results

3.1 Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station

3.1.1 Visual Assessment
The Rancho Solano Golf Course pump station consists of a concrete masonry building, three pumps that feed water through a combined discharge pipe to two filtration units, and associated coated steel and ductile iron piping, valves, and controllers.

In general, the concrete surfaces of the pump station were in VANDA Level 1 condition. Sounding was performed on the station’s walls and floor. No signs of concrete spalling or delamination were observed during the assessment.

The metal components and piping were in VANDA Level 2 condition excluding the metal cabinet shown in Photo 3-2, which was in VANDA Level 4 condition. Table 3-1 presents a summary of observed defects at the pump station. The noted defects included:
▪ Minor corrosion of the pump discharge piping, see Photo 3-1; ▪ Severe surface corrosion on a metal cabinet and the metal platform beneath, see Photo 3-2. ▪ Surface corrosion on the bottom of the bladder tank in contact with the metal platform , see Photo 3-3.
▪ Surface corrosion of a ductile iron tee, see Photo 3-4. ▪ Surface corrosion on the bottom panel of the electrical cabinet and leg supports, see Photo 3-5 and Photo 3-6.
▪ The coating of the metal platform was generally in good condition except at locations in contact with mounted structures. This is likely attributed to dissimilar metals. ▪ Coating deterioration was observed on the supports of equipment as shown in Photo 3-1, Photo 3-2 and Photo 3-5.
▪ Water leakage was observed coming from the filtration unit shown in Photo 3-7. The water leaking from the unit may promote corrosion of surrounding metallic components.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 8
Photo 3-1. Corrosion staining on surface of pump
discharge piping.

Photo 3-2. Corrosion on bottom of metal cabinet
and metal platform.

Photo 3-3. Surface corrosion on bottom of
bladder tank.

Photo 3-4. Surface corrosion of ductile iron tee.

Photo 3-5. Corrosion on bottom panel of
electrical cabinet.

Photo 3-6. Coating damage and minor corrosion
on cabinet leg.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 9
Photo 3-7. Signs of water leakage from filtration
unit.

Photo 3-8. Pump station walls and roof in good
condition. No observed degradation.

Table 3-1. Summary of Defects Observed at the Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station Defect
ID Location Type
VANDA
Condition Remarks
1 Discharge
pipe
Corrosion staining Level 2 Surface corrosion along the discharge pipe.
2 Metal cabinet Sever Surface corrosion Level 4 Severe surface corrosion on cabinets legs and side panel.
3 Bladder tank Surface corrosion Level 2 Surface corrosion at metal platform connection.
4 Ductile iron
tee
Surface Corrosion Level 2 Surface corrosion on entire surface of joint.
5 Electrical
cabinet
Surface corrosion Level 2 Surface corrosion on entire panel base. 6 Electrical
cabinet
Coating damage and
corrosion
Level 2 Corrosion of electrical panel legs at
platform connection.
7 Metal cabinet Surface corrosion Level 2 Surface corrosion on platform.

3.1.2 Ultrasonic Thickness Testing
Ultrasonic thickness measurements were recorded on the accessible steel pipe on the main floor.

Measurements were recorded in bands along the circumference of the pipeline (4 circumferential readings per band) spaced at regular intervals. The thickness measurements and associated conclusions only apply to where the readings were taken. The nominal thickness of the piping is not known; therefore, an assumed nominal thickness, based on ANSI B36.10 for standard steel pipe and ANSI/AWWA C150/A21.5 for ductile iron were used to determine the metal loss.

UT measurements are summarized in Table 3-2. The maximum measured metal loss on the 66-inch pipe was 8%, which is considered minor solely based on metal loss. The metallic assets were classified as VANDA Level 2 condition.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 10
Table 3-2. UT Summary Data for Rancho Solano Golf Course PS Piping UT Band Size/Material
Minimum
Thickness
(inches)
Average
Thickness
(inches)
Maximum
Thickness
(inches)
Assumed
Nominal
Thickness
(inches)
Maximum
Metal Loss
(%)
1-3
12" steel w/
white coating 0.398 0.419 0.458 0.406 2%
4 6" steel w/
blue coating 0.249 0.259 0.263 0.280 11%
5 14" ductile iron
w/ black
coating

0.383 0.397 0.410 0.390 2%
6 14" ductile iron
w/ black
coating
(exterior)

0.355 0.389 0.417 0.390 9%
7 8" ductile iron
w/ white
coating
(exterior)

0.339 0.372 0.406 0.390 13%
8 12" welded
steel w/ gray
coating

0.358 0.361 0.363 0.375 5%
9 8" ductile iron
w/ black
coating

0.338 0.377 0.411 0.390 13%
*Assumed Nominal Pipe Thickness is based on standard schedules for seamless and welded carbon and alloy steel pipes per ANSI B36.10, and ductile iron pipe per ANSI/AWWA C150/A21.5.

3.1.2.1 Dry Film Thickness
Dry film thickness measurements were recorded on the coating of the Golf Course PS. Typically, a minimum coating thickness of eight mils is recommended for this coating per AWWA C218. The average DFT thickness exceeds the recommended DFT. Table 3-3 summarizes the DFT measurements.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 11
Table 3-3. Rancho Solano Golf Course DFT Summary
Location Pipe
Minimum
(mils)
Average
(mils)
Maximum
(mils)
Std.

Dev.
(mils)
Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS 12-inch welded steel w/ white coating 0.70 2.08 4.30 0.91 Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS 6-inch welded steel w/ blue coating 1.90 3.92 5.30 0.93 Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS 14-inch ductile iron w/ black coating 1.10 3.12 5.80 1.15 Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS
14-inch ductile iron w/black coating
(exterior) 0.80 2.52 4.50 1.20
Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS
8-inch ductile iron w/white coating
(exterior) 4.00 2.91 8.70 1.95
Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS 12-inch welded steel w/ gray coating 1.80 2.76 3.60 0.49 Rancho Solano
Golf Course PS 8-inch ductile iron w/ black coating 2.30 3.78 10.60 2.95

3.1.3 Condition Summary
Table 3-4 summarizes the overall condition of the Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Stations.

Table 3-4. Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station Condition Summary Building Structure/Equipment
VANDA
Condition Remarks
Rancho Solano Golf
Course PS
Concrete masonry unit
walls
Level 1 Minor self-healed cracks, no signs of
delamination.

Concrete floor and pipe
pedestals
Level 1 Minor self-healed cracks, no signs of
delamination.

Metal components and
piping
Level 2 Surface corrosion on piping, metal
cabinets and metal platform. Metal
thickness measurements indicate
minor corrosion of piping.

3.1.4 Recommendations
Based on the results of the condition assessment, V&A presents the following recommendations for West Yost and the City of Fairfield to consider.
▪ Within 2 years, perform touch-up coating repairs on the metallic components presenting surface corrosion.
▪ Replacement of the metal cabinet.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 12

3.2 Rancho Solano Raw Water PS

3.2.1 Visual Assessment
The Rancho Solano Raw Water PS consists of a concrete masonry building, four pumps that feed into a combined discharge pipe, associated coated steel, as well as valves, and controllers.

In general, the concrete surfaces and metal piping were in VANDA Level 1 condition. The discharge pump, piping, and platform had recently been recoated. The coating was in good condition on the interior and exterior piping, as seen in Photo 3-9 and Photo 3-10. The electrical cabinet and metal platform were in good condition with no observed defects; see Photo 3-11. The concrete masonry walls and concrete floors were in good condition; see Photo 3-12. Sounding was performed on the station walls and floor. No signs of concrete spalling or delamination were observed during the assessment.

Photo 3-9. Pumps and effluent pipe in good
condition; recently coated.

Photo 3-10. Effluent pipe outside in good
condition.

Photo 3-11. Electrical cabinet in good condition;
Metal platform in good condition.

Photo 3-12. Pump station walls in good
condition; no degradation of brick or concrete.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 13

3.2.2 Ultrasonic Thickness Testing
Ultrasonic thickness measurements were recorded on the accessible steel pipe on the main floor.

Measurements were recorded in bands along the circumference of the pipeline (four circumferential readings per band) spaced at regular intervals. The thickness measurements and associated conclusions only apply to where the readings were taken. The nominal thickness of the piping is not known; therefore, an assumed nominal thickness, based on ANSI B36.10 for standard steel was used to determine the metal loss.

Ultrasonic thickness measurements are summarized in Table 3-5. The maximum measured metal loss on the 66-inch pipe was 5%, which is considered minor solely based on metal loss. The metallic assets were classified as VANDA Level 2 condition.

Table 3-5. UT Summary Data for the Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station Piping Location
UT
Band
Size/Material
Minimum
Thickness
(inches)
Average
Thickness
(inches)
Maximum
Thickness
(inches)
Assumed
Nominal
Thickness
(inches)
Maximum
Metal Loss
(%)
Rancho Solano
Raw Water PS 1-3
10" steel w/
green
coating

0.365 0.379 0.393 0.360 0%
Rancho Solano
Raw Water PS 4-5
14" steel w/
green
coating
(exterior)

0.357 0.393 0.417 0.375 5%
*Assumed Nominal Pipe Thickness is based on standard schedules for seamless and welded carbon and alloy steel pipes per ANSI B36.10, and ductile iron pipe per ANSI/AWWA C150/A21.5.

3.2.2.1 Dry Film Thickness
Dry film thickness measurements were recorded on the coating of the Raw Water PS piping. Typically, a minimum coating thickness of eight mils is recommended for this coating per AWWA C218. The average DFT thickness exceeds the recommended DFT. Table 3-3 summarizes the DFT measurements.

Table 3-6. Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station DFT Summary Location Pipe
Minimum
(mils)
Average
(mils)
Maximum
(mils)
Std.

Dev.
(mils)
Rancho Solano Raw
Water PS 10-in welded steel w/ green coating 5.60 10.43 15.70 2.31 Rancho Solano Raw
Water PS
14 -in welded teel w/ green coating
(exterior) 5.90 9.03 12.50 1.61
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Abbreviations and Acronyms V&A Project No. 22-0005 14

3.2.3 Condition Summary
Table 3-4 summarizes the overall condition of the Rancho Solano Pump Stations.

Table 3-7. Raw Water Pump Station Condition Summary
Building Structure/Equipment
VANDA
Condition Remarks
Rancho Solano Raw
Water PS
Concrete masonry unit
walls
Level 2 Minor self-healed cracks, no signs of
delamination.

Concrete floor Level 1 Minor self-healed cracks, no signs of delamination.

Metal components and
piping.

Level 1 Metal components had been recently
coated; in good condition.

3.2.4 Recommendations
▪ In 5 – 10 years, reassess the pump station.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-1
Appendix A
UT Locations and Data
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-2
Photo A--1. UT band locations 1-5 for the Golf Course PS.

Photo A--2. UT band location 6 for the Golf Course PS.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-3
Photo A--3. UT Band location 7 for the Golf Course PS.

Photo A--4. UT Band location 8 for the Golf Course PS.

Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-4
Photo A--5. UT band location 9 for the Golf Course PS
.

Photo A--6. UT band locations 1-2 for the Raw Water PS
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-5
2 Photo A-7. UT band location 3 for Raw Water PS
Photo A--8. UT band location 4 for the Raw Water PS
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-6
Photo A--9 UT band 5 for the Raw Water PS
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-7
Table A-1. Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station Raw UT Data Band Location
Clock Positions
12:00 3:00 6:00 9:00
1 12" steel w/
white coating 0.444 0.421 0.421 0.438
2 12" steel w/
white coating 0.425 0.398 0.402 0.458
3 12" steel w/
white coating 0.406 0.400 0.413 0.401
4 6" steel w/
blue coating 0.260 0.263 0.249 0.262
5 14" ductile
iron w/ black
coating

0.397 0.410 0.399 0.383
6 14" ductile
iron w/ black
coating
(exterior)

0.417 0.355 0.387 0.397
7 8" ductile
iron w/ white
coating
(exterior)

0.406 0.300 0.339 0.370
8 12" steel w/
white coating 0.363 0.363 0.358 0.360
9 8" ductile
iron w/ black
coating

0.338 0.411 0.390 0.37
Condition Assessment of Rancho Solano Golf Course and Raw Water Pump Stations Appendix A UT Locations and Data
V&A Project No. 22-0005 A-8
Table A-2. Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station Raw UT Data Band Location
Clock Positions
12:00 3:00 6:00 9:00
1 10" steel w/ green
coating 0.359 0.358 0.357 0.360
2 12" steel w/ white
coating 0.357 0.358 0.357 0.365
3 12" steel w/ white
coating 0.393 0.388 0.375 0.395
4 14" steel w/ green
coating (exterior) 0.365 0.381 0.393 0.378
5 12" steel w/ white
coating 0.417 0.405 0.357 0.394
1000 Broadway
Suite 320
Oakland, CA 94607
510.903.6600
510.903.6601, Fax
Component Risk Results, Rehab/Replacement Projects,
and Action Plan by Facility
Appendix C
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-047 Surge Protector 5 5 20 1
Located in ATS. Red Fail light present. Has not been
replaced since last survey.

Replace surge protector with newer, currently supported model 10 6 High Replace $ 3,700
ELEC ELEC-045 System Service 2 1 40 21 3 9 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-046 Motor Control Center 2 1 20 1
Previously installed Pump VFDs have been removed and
replaces with CS Starters
Eastridge Station Control Panel
Allen Bradley PLC-5
Input / Output List: CPU / DI / DI / DO /
AO / AI / PS 24V
9 Control Relays
I/O Terminal Blocks
DC Power Supplies
Battery Backups
PLC panel is part of Eastridge MCC 6 9 Med-High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 INST INST-042 Flow Element 4 4 15 -4
Frequent Malfunctions. Several parts have already been
replaced. Recommend replacement of entire unit. Replace flow meter with newer model. 9 5 Med-High Replace $ 9,157 PIPE PIPE-026 Pump Discharge Piping 3 1 50 32 Corrosion on pipe tap connection. Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-157 Yard Piping 2 2 50 34
Zone-to-zone regulating piping. Not included in 2015
assessment. 4 9 Med-High No Action Required
ELEC ELEC-083 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 1 6 6 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 74,000 PIPE PIPE-001 Yard Piping 2 1 50 32 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-024 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-028 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-030 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 3 9 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-011 Controller 4 3 20 2 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace PLC with newer model. Will require replacement
of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500
PIPE PIPE-023 Pump Suction Piping 1 1 50 32 Pipe is buried, unobservable (no photo) 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-025 Pump Suction Piping 1 1 50 32 Pipe is buried, unobservable (no photo) 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-027 Pump Suction Piping 1 1 50 32 Pipe is buried, unobservable (no photo) 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-029 Pump Suction Piping 1 1 50 32 Pipe is buried, unobservable (no photo) 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-158 Yard Piping 1 1 50 44 Hydrotank bypass line. 2 9 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-043 Pressure Element 3 5 15 -4
Appears inoperable. Redundant after installation of
Rosemount DP transmitter. Recommend removal. Remove unused instrument. 10 6 High No Action Required INST INST-044 Pressure Element 4 4 15 -4
Installed haphazardly. DP lines are not well secured.

Replace.

Replace gauge with newer model. Secure differential
pressure lines to avoid bending and other damage. 9 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 SCDA SCDA-010 SCADA/Telemetry 2 2 10 -8 OIT is at end of supported life. Replace OIT with newer model. 7 4 Medium Replace $ 83,250 ELEC ELEC-101 Other (General Electrical) 2 2 20 1 Compressor control panel. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 74,000 INST INST-090 Pressure Element 3 2 15 -2 7 2 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments HVAC HVAC-001 Wall Fan 1 1 15 -3 6 5 Medium No Action Required HVAC HVAC-013 Wall Fan 1 1 15 -3 6 5 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-049 Convenience Receptacles 2 1 20 1 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 FIRE FIRE-001 Fire Extinguisher 1 1 15 -3 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required SECR SECR-005 Alarm Systems 1 1 15 -3 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 VALV VALV-110 D/S Isolation Valve 3 1 30 12
Moderate rust/corrosion observable on stem; paint
peeling
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-111 D/S Isolation Valve 3 1 30 12
Moderate rust/corrosion observable on stem; paint
peeling
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-112 D/S Isolation Valve 3 1 30 12
Moderate rust/corrosion observable on stem; paint
peeling
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-179 Pump Control Valve 3 1 25 19
Moderate corrosion on body and bolts; Valve is
unsupported
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-180 Pump Control Valve 3 1 25 19
Moderate corrosion on body and bolts; Valve is
unsupported
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-287 U/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 12 Heavy rust/corrosion observable on stem; paint peeling Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-288 D/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 12 Heavy rust/corrosion observable on stem; paint peeling Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-048 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 6 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC GENR-011 Onsite Generator 2 1 25 7
Fuel storage: 250-gallon underbelly tank Moderate
corrosion observable on exhaust silencer. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: New Cla Val PCV has been installed on pumps 1,2,3. New hydro tank parts have been installed, including a hydro tank bypass and isolation valves Operator Issues:
- TigerMag flowmeter
- PLC5 controller (reservoir too)
- Hydro tank plumbing is a mess, abandoned pressure transmitter - Rosemount 1151 pressure transmitter on hydrotank
- Wire mess next to backflow device outside
- Fiber to Reservoir Vault
- Panelview 600 HMI
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $738,797
Facility: 011 Eastridge Zone 3 Pump Station (Hydro)
Inspection Date: 6/14/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
TANK TANK-001 Hydropneumatic Tank 2 1 30 12 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-004 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-113 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-181 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 7 Minor corrosion on bolts 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-300 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-343 Air Valve 3 2 30 24 Corrosion observable and paint peeling.

Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 5 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-001 Pump 2 3 30 12
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess the
isolation valves to be sure there is no recirculation. 6 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-220 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 12
Valve is buried, below the concrete slab. Did not
observe. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-221 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 12
Valve is buried, below the concrete slab. Did not
observe. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-222 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 12
Valve is buried, below the concrete slab. Did not
observe. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-223 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 12
Valve is buried, below the concrete slab. Did not
observe. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COMP COMP-001 Air Compressor 1 1 20 2 5 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 2,775 MOTR MOTR-001 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-002 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-003 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-004 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-002 Pump 2 3 30 12
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess the
isolation valves to be sure there is no recirculation. 6 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-003 Pump 3 3 30 12
Concrete chipping away below base plate. Rebuilt in
2013.. Rebuilt in 2013.

Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess the
isolation valves to be sure there is no recirculation. 6 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-004 Pump 2 5 30 12
Coordinate with manufacturer to verify correct pump
curve. 8 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments LGHT LGHT-021 Lighting 2 1 20 2 5 2 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-002 Air Valve 2 1 30 12 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-178 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 19 Minor corrosion on bolts; Valve is unsupported 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-301 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ACCS ACCS-001 Gravel 1 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-001 Seals 2 1 30 12 Minor corrosion 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-002 Seals 2 1 30 12 Minor corrosion 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-003 Seals 2 1 30 12 Minor corrosion 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-004 Seals 2 1 30 12 Minor corrosion 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-001 Structure 1 1 50 32
Coating: Paint;
Dimensions: 38' x 24' x 9'';
Personnel Access: 6' Wide double-doors
Equipment Ingress/Egress: Hatches on Roof
3 4 Med-Low No Action Required
BLDG BLDG-002 Roof 1 1 50 32 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-341 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 U/S isolation gate valve for Hydrotank bypass line. 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-342 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 D/S isolation gate valve for Hydrotank bypass line. 2 4 Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-001 Drainage 1 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required FENC FENC-001 Fencing - CMU 1 1 40 22 3 3 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-001 Water Service 1 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
CNTR CNTR-004 Controller 4 3 20 4 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 ELEC ELEC-008 System Service 3 2 40 25 Breaker is from 2011. Still functions, but old. 5 9 Med-High No Action Required ELEC ELEC-009 Motor Control Center 2 2 20 5
15kVA transformer located in PLC panel. Heat source
and unsafe mix of high and low V. Recommend
relocating.

Soft starters perform well and in good condition.

Gold Ridge Zone 2 PS Control Panel
Allen Bradley PLC-5;
Input / Output List: CPU / DI / DI / DO /;
AO / AI / PS 24V
9 Control Relays; I/O Terminal Blocks; 480V
Transformer PLC panel is part of Gold Ridge Z2 MCC.
480V Transformer is located at bottom of panel,
mixing high and low voltage. Safety Issue.

Space permitting, transformer and all high voltage
wiring should be removed from PLC panel and moved
to a separate panel 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-159 Yard Piping 2 1 50 34
Zone-to-zone regulating piping; discharge to ground,
not included in 2015 assessment. 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-002 Yard Piping 2 1 50 34 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-031 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 34 ARV threads corroded 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-032 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 34 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-033 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 34 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-034 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 34 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-035 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 34 ARV threads corroded 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-036 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 34 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-037 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 34 ARV threads corroded 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-038 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 34 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-132 Yard Piping 2 1 50 34 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required INST INST-019 Pressure Element 3 2 15 0
Gage pressure Transmitter Functions, but model
obsolete and discontinued, and requires frequent
recalibration. Replace gauge with newer model 7 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 INST INST-020 Pressure Element 3 2 15 0
Discharge Pressure Transmitter Functions, but model
obsolete and discontinued, and requires frequent
recalibration. Replace gauge with newer model 7 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 HVAC HVAC-017 Roof Fan 2 2 15 -1 Roof fan not included in 2015 assessment 7 5 Medium No Action Required INST INST-018 Flow Element 3 2 15 0 Functions, but discontinued.

Eventual replacement is recommended due to lack of
current device support. 7 5 Medium No Action Required
SCDA SCDA-002 SCADA/Telemetry 2 2 10 -6
New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-298 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 9 4 6 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-299 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 9 4 6 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-347 Other (Valves) 2 2 25 9
Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV, not
included in 2015 assessment. 5 5 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-082 Surge Protector 1 1 20 20
Replaced 6 months ago. Brand new. Same model as
prior 2 6 Med-Low No Action Required
LGHT LGHT-007 Lighting 2 3 20 5
Takes a while to warm up. Recommend LED
replacement.

Replace flourescent lighting with LEDs for more
reliability and efficiency. 6 2 Med-Low Replace $ 33,744 VALV VALV-295 Pressure Relief Valve 0 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-005 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-008 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 9 D/S isolation for zone-to-zone PRV. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-170 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-171 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-172 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-182 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 9
Corrosion on bolts and on small diameter piping
connections Replace corroded parts and recoat the valve 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Inspection Notes:

Operator Issues:

Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost
Selected Assets:

Staff would like fluorescent interior lights and non-LED exterior lights installed, Allen-Bradley SMC Flex VFDs for pump motors, PLC5 Controller, ABB MagMaster flowmeter, Rosemount 1151 Pressure transmitters, Panelview 600 HMI, Em Gen Load Bank, and to move the transformer out of PLC cabinet
Pump 4 impeller has been trimmed, and the hydro tank has been rehabilitated (plates welded for rust) $60,014
Facility:

Inspection Date:

Inspectors:
003 Gold Ridge Zone 2 Pump Station (Hydro)
6/15/2022
Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
VALV VALV-183 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 9
Corrosion on bolts and on small diameter piping
connections Replace corroded parts and recoat the valve 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-184 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-185 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-346 U/S Isolation Valve 2 2 30 14
U/S isolation for zone-to-zone PRV, not included in
2015 assessment. 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required
COUP COUP-064 Other (Coupling) 2 2 20 4
U/S Isolation for Hydrotank not included in 2015
assessment 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FIRE FIRE-017 Fire Extinguisher 0 0 15 -1 5 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan ELEC ELEC-010 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 10 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-089 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 14
Automatic transfer switch. Exercised regularly. Good
condition 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required
TANK TANK-002 Hydropneumatic Tank 2 1 30 14 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-007 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 9 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-009 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 9 Over pressure relief, angle style, discharge to ground. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-088 Other (General Electrical) 1 2 20 17
DC Battery backup for plc panel. One battery less than
80% charged per light, but otherwise good condition. 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC GENR-005 Onsite Generator 1 1 25 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-348 Air Valve 2 2 30 14
Double air-valve assembly on Pump 1 suction, not
included in 2015 assessment. Corrosion on threads
connecting to suction pipe.

Replace pipe nipple connecting to pump suction
piping 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-349 Air Valve 2 2 30 14
Double air-valve assembly on Pump 2 suction, not
included in 2015 assessment. Corrosion on threads
connecting to suction pipe. Paint peeling on valve.

Replace pipe nipple connecting to pump suction
piping 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-350 Air Valve 2 2 30 14
Double air-valve assembly on Pump 3 suction, not
included in 2015 assessment. Corrosion on threads
connecting to suction pipe and top of valve. Evidence
of minor leakage.

Replace pipe nipple connecting to pump suction
piping 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-003 Other (Coupling) 3 1 20 4 Rubber deteriorating 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-114 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-115 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-116 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-117 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-224 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-225 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-226 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-227 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-297 Air Valve 2 2 30 14
Corrosion on connection to main pipe, evidence of
minor leak. 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required
COMP COMP-002 Air Compressor 1 1 20 4 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-004 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-005 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-006 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-007 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-032 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-033 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-035 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-036 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 4 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments BLDG BLDG-003 Structure 1 1 50 34 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-004 Roof 1 1 50 34 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-005 Motor 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-006 Motor 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-008 Motor 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-009 Motor 2 1 30 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-005 Pump 2 3 30 14
Nameplate Data: 1000 gpm, 100' TDH, 10.69"
impeller
Tested Data: 960 gpm, 95' TDH
Pump #4 impeller has been trimmed recently.

Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-006 Pump 2 3 30 14
Nameplate Data: 1000 gpm, 100' TDH, 10.69"
impeller
Tested Data: 942 gpm, 95' TDH
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-007 Pump 2 3 30 14
Nameplate Data: 1000 gpm, 100' TDH, 10.69"
impeller
Tested Data: 914 gpm, 95' TDH
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
PUMP PUMP-008 Pump 2 3 30 14
Nameplate Data: 1385 gpm, 110' TDH, 12.09"
impeller
Tested Data: 1373 gpm, 104' TDH
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-011 Convenience Receptacles 2 1 20 5 Equipped with GFI. 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments LGHT LGHT-005 Lighting 2 1 20 5
Adequate lighting. Good condition, but not brand
new. 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required
LGHT LGHT-006 Lighting 1 1 20 5 Appears almost new. 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-002 Level Sight Glass 1 1 30 15 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-002 Drainage 1 1 50 34 3 3 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-006 Air Valve 2 1 30 14
Corrosion on threads connecting to main pipe. Paint
peeling on valve. Replace pipe nipple connecting to main piping 3 2 Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-296 Air Valve 2 1 30 14 3 2 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-002 Water Service 2 1 50 34 Corrosion on threads connecting to main pipe. 3 3 Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-042 Roll-up Door 2 1 50 34 Roll-up door not included in 2015 assessment. 3 3 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-002 Concrete 1 1 50 34 3 3 Low No Action Required FENC FENC-002 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 24 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-006 Seals 2 1 30 14 Corrosion on bolt threads 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-007 Seals 2 1 30 14 Corrosion on bolt threads 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-005 Seals 1 1 30 14 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-008 Seals 1 1 30 14 3 3 Low No Action Required INST INST-091 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13 Differential Pressure gauge Replacement for INST-017. 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-092 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13
D/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV not included in 2015
assessment Replace pipe nipple connecting to main piping 2 2 Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-013 Motor Control Center 3 3 20 -12 8 9 High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 SCDA SCDA-003 SCADA/Telemetry 4 3 10 -22
Many old components.

New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 8 4 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-005 Controller 4 3 20 -12
PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend
replacement
Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 ELEC ELEC-012 System Service 2 2 40 8 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-039 Pump Suction Piping 3 2 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on pressure gauge nipple Recoat the piping 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-133 Yard Piping 3 2 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-003 Yard Piping 2 1 50 18 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-040 Pump Discharge Piping 2 2 50 18 5 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-041 Pump Suction Piping 2 2 50 18 5 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-042 Pump Discharge Piping 2 2 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 5 9 Med-High No Action Required ELEC ELEC-015 Lighting Panel 3 3 25 -7
Should not be enclosed in Control Panel. Recommend
relocating Lighting panel to location outside of RTU
panel.

Space permitting, breaker panel and associated wiring
should be removed from PLC panel and moved
outside of the MCC to a nearby wall. 8 5 Med-High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 13,875 INST INST-022 Flow Element 1 3 15 9
Replaced with new meter. PETS confirmed more than
10% flow deviation. Recalibrate flow meter to reduce flow deviation. 5 5 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-061 Other (Coupling) 3 2 20 -12
Significant offset between valves, rubber
deteriorating. Replace coupling 7 3 Medium Replace $ 463 COUP COUP-062 Other (Coupling) 3 2 20 -12 Rubber deteriorating Replace coupling 7 3 Medium Replace $ 463 VALV VALV-011 Air Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 VALV VALV-012 Air Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 SEAL SEAL-009 Seals 3 2 30 -2 Paint peeling, corrosion on bolts Recoat the seal, replace bolts 7 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-010 Seals 3 2 30 -2 Paint peeling, corrosion on bolts Recoat the seal, replace bolts 7 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments GENR GENR-006 Adaptor for Portable Unit 2 2 20 -12 Slightly dirty, but otherwise functional 7 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,250 MOTR MOTR-010 Motor 2 2 30 -2 Paint peeling Inspect motor and rebuild as necessary 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments MOTR MOTR-011 Motor 2 2 30 -2 Paint peeling Inspect motor and rebuild as necessary 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-009 Pump 2 4 30 -2
Install VFD and/or pressure controls or Replace. See
recommendations in Table 2-7 9 3 Med-High Replace $ 37,000 PUMP PUMP-010 Pump 2 4 30 -2
Install VFD and/or pressure controls or Replace. See
recommendations in Table 2-7 9 3 Med-High Replace $ 37,000 ELEC ELEC-016 Convenience Receptacles 2 2 20 -12
Convenience Receptacles
125V / 20A & GFI
Enclosure
Manufacturer: Hoffman
Model: A48h36DLP
Size: 48”Hx36”Wx12”D
Rating: NEMA 12
Construction:14 gauge steel
Finish: ANSI 61 Gray Previously included DO Relays,
DC power supply, and DC/DC converter were not
found during site walk 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 FIRE FIRE-002 Fire Extinguisher 2 2 15 -17 7 2 Medium No Action Required INST INST-023 Pressure Element 2 2 15 -17 7 5 Medium No Action Required SECR SECR-009 Alarm Systems 1 1 15 -17 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 INST INST-021 Level Element 0 0 15 -17
Only found readout device. Instrument is likely at
reservoir. Unable to confirm condition. 5 4 Medium Inspect to Create Action Plan BLDG BLDG-005 Structure 2 2 50 18 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-061 Flow Element 0 0 15 9 2 5 Low Inspect to Create Action Plan BLDG BLDG-006 Roof 1 1 50 18 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-013 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-014 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-186 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-187 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-118 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-119 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-228 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: City has installed new gate valves, new backpressure valve, PRV and cla val PCV 2016/2017. Also new effluent shutoff valve in street has been installed.

Operator Issues:
- Wood structure
- Old MCC with many modifications
- Non-LED exterior lights
- Very old transfer switch
- PLC 5 controller, modified panel, ad-hoc flowmeter transmitter installation - Lighting panel is inside PLC panel, not safe for non-electrical personnel - Radio antenna coax not well-secured
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $623,080
Facility: 004 Mangels Zone 2 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/14/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
VALV VALV-229 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-003 Water Service 2 1 50 18 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-003 Concrete 1 1 50 18 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-010 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 U/S isolation gate valve for flow meter. 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-015 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-016 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-279 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 Isolation valve for flow meter bypass line. 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-280 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-281 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-339 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24
Isolation gate valve on suction piping, not included in 2015 assessment. 2 4 Low No Action Required
VALV VALV-340 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24
D/S isolation gate valve for flow meter, not included
in 2015 assessment. 2 4 Low No Action Required
LGHT LGHT-008 Lighting 1 1 20 19 Appear recently replaced. Adequate lighting. 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-024 Pressure Element 1 1 15 14
Ashcroft Pressure Transmitter
EL Rating: 15A, 125/250/480VAC 1/2A,125VDC
Range: 200PSI
Proof: 1000PSI
MAT'L: BUNA/ST.ST Replaced with Ashcroft. Good
Condition 2 2 Low No Action Required
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-018 Motor Control Center 2 1 20 -4
Pump bucket contents previously melted
completely, and have since been replaced. Currently
in very good condition. Radio in middle of cutover.

Panel overcrowded and obsolete. Needs replacing.

Replace subpanel and panel components to avoid
overcrowding. 6 9 54 Med-High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 CNTR CNTR-006 Controller 4 3 20 -4
PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend
replacement
Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 40 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 ELEC ELEC-017 System Service 2 2 40 16 5 9 45 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-004 Yard Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-044 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-045 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-046 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-047 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-048 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-134 Yard Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-043 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 26 3 9 27 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-085 Other (General Electrical) 3 3 20 -4
Old radio still present and frequently loses
connection. New radio present but hasn’t been cut
over.

Finish migration of communications onto new
radio system and remove old radio from panel. 8 6 48 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-026 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -9 Model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 48 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 ELEC ELEC-019 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 1 6 5 30 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 13,875 VALV VALV-019 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 1 6 4 24 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 VALV VALV-188 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 1 6 4 24 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 31,349 VALV VALV-189 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 1 6 4 24 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 31,349 VALV VALV-190 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 1 6 4 24 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 31,349 HVAC HVAC-002 Roof Fan 2 1 15 -9 6 5 30 Medium No Action Required SECR SECR-014 Alarm Systems 1 1 15 -9 6 2 12 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 FIRE FIRE-003 Fire Extinguisher 2 2 15 -9 7 2 14 Medium No Action Required INST INST-027 Pressure Element 3 2 15 -9 Old but working. 7 2 14 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SCDA SCDA-004 SCADA/Telemetry 0 0 10 -14
No screens viewed. No OITs.

New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications onto new
radio system and remove old radio from panel. 5 4 20 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-051 D/S Coupling 3 2 20 12 Rubber deterioration Replace coupling 5 3 15 Med-Low Replace $ 606 COUP COUP-052 D/S Coupling 3 2 20 12 Rubber deterioration Replace coupling 5 3 15 Med-Low Replace $ 606 COUP COUP-053 D/S Coupling 3 2 20 12
Significant offset between valves. Rubber
deterioration Replace coupling 5 3 15 Med-Low Replace $ 606 SEAL SEAL-013 Seals 3 2 30 6 Corrosion/moisture observed Replace seal 5 3 15 Med-Low Replace $ 5,550 ELEC ELEC-091 Other (General Electrical) 2 2 20 17
DC battery backup for RTU panel.

Battery Tender 12V Charger
Batteries Replaced 8-2019 4 5 20 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-230 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 6 4 4 16 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-025 Flow Element 1 1 15 13
Rosemount Flow Transmitter
Supply: 90-250 VAC 50/60Hz, 0.45A, 40VA
Output: Modbus RS485, Pulse 0-10,000 Hz
Mfg Date 2020-05
Ambient Temp: -29C to +60C
Type 4X IP66 Replaced 2020. 2 5 10 Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-012 Motor 2 1 30 6 4 4 16 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-013 Motor 2 1 30 6 4 4 16 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-014 Motor 2 1 30 6 4 4 16 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-011 Pump 2 1 30 6
Continue operating pumps to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-012 Pump 2 2 30 6
Continue operating pumps to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 5 3 15 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-013 Pump 2 1 30 6
Continue operating pumps to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required FENC FENC-003 Fencing - Chain Link 2 1 40 6 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-003 Drainage 2 2 50 26 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-018 Air Valve 2 1 30 6 4 2 8 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-276 Air Valve 2 1 30 6 4 2 8 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments BLDG BLDG-007 Structure 1 1 50 26 3 4 12 Med-Low No Action Required Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: All new gate valves and flow meter. Same Cla Val PCV and PRV. Note: the check in the street doesn’t hold zone 2 to 1 so a valve was closed in the street.

Operator Issues:
- Wood structure
- Old MCC
- PLC5 controller, panel is a disorganized
- Phase monitor takes power directly from MCC busbar, only upstream breaker is the building main - Rosemount 1151 pressure transmitters
- Main Breaker replaced twice
- Radio Antenna Blocked by trees
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $613,126
Facility: 005 Martin Hill Zone 2 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/14/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
BLDG BLDG-008 Roof 1 1 50 26 3 4 12 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-120 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-121 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-122 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-231 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-232 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 2 4 8 Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-009 Roll-up Door 2 2 50 26 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-011 Seals 2 1 30 6 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-012 Seals 2 1 30 6 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-004 Concrete 1 1 50 16 4 3 12 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-017 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-274 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 24 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-275 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 24 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-344 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV. 2 4 8 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-345 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 29 Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV. 2 4 8 Low No Action Required GENR GENR-007 Adaptor for Portable Unit 1 1 20 19 Replaced 2021. 2 3 6 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-004 Water Service 2 1 50 26 3 3 9 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-022 Motor Control Center 4 4 20 -11
Pump 3 transformer insulation has leaked residue onto
bottom of bucket. No sign of water intrusion. P1
contractor buzzes very loudly. Significant maintenance
required.

Paradise Valler Zone 2 PS Control Panel
Allen Bradley PLC-5;
Input / Output List: CPU / DI / DI / DO /;
AO / AI / PS 24V
6 Control Relays I/O Terminal Blocks; DC Power
Supplies; Battery Backups & Chargers
PLC panel: McCrometer Flow Meter (Panel Door) is
part of MCC
Replace transformers with newer
model, clean residue from panel. 9 9 High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-036 Level Element 0 0 15 -16
Readout for level element at reservoir. Unable to
assess condition or performance of level transmitter. 5 8 Med-High Inspect to Create Action Plan SCDA SCDA-005 SCADA/Telemetry 3 3 10 -21
New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications
onto new radio system and remove
old radio from panel. 8 4 Medium No Action Required
CNTR CNTR-007 Controller 4 3 20 -11 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace PLC with newer model. Will
require replacement of subpanel
components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500
ELEC ELEC-021 System Service 2 2 40 9 Main breaker has been replaced several times. 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-049 Pump Suction Piping 3 1 50 19 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-050 Pump Discharge Piping 3 1 50 19 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-051 Pump Suction Piping 3 1 50 19 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-052 Pump Discharge Piping 3 1 50 19 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-053 Pump Suction Piping 3 1 50 19 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-054 Pump Discharge Piping 3 1 50 19 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-135 Yard Piping 3 1 50 19 Corrosion observable, paint peeling. 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-005 Yard Piping 2 1 50 19 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PUMP PUMP-014 Pump 2 3 30 -1 Actual flowrate is significantly below rated flowrate.

Continue operating pumps to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium No Action Required PUMP PUMP-015 Pump 2 3 30 -1 Actual flowrate is significantly below rated flowrate.

Assess the pump for wear on the
impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is
no recirculation.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-016 Pump 2 3 30 -1
Actual flowrate is significantly below rated flowrate.

Stem shakes when pump is on. Pump #3 recently
rebuilt
Continue operating pumps to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium No Action Required INST INST-040 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -16
Suction side pressure transmitter.

Range: 0-150PSI Obsolete and difficult to calibrate.

Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 HVAC HVAC-003 Wall Fan 2 1 15 -16 6 5 Medium No Action Required COUP COUP-054 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 -11 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-055 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 -11 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-056 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 -11 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: City has rebuilt pump 3, installed new Cla Val PCV on all pumps, new gate and butterfly valves inside, outside and underground. One valve was buried inoperable in place. Installed new PRV, flow meter and above and below ground ARVs.

Operator Issues:
- MCC is very old with lots of modifications, abandoned light and switch(?) in weather wrap - PLC 5 controller, panel is old and highly modified, ad-hoc flowmeter transmitter placement - Rosemount 1151 Pressure transmitter
- Fluorescent interior lights
- Ventilation fan for pump building is old
- Autotransformer starters for pump motors
- Motor overloads often nuisance trip
- Main Breaker (Siemens) has been replaced 3 times
- Roof (sunshade) over MCC
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $47,883
Facility: 006 Paradise Valley Zone 2 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/15/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
MOTR MOTR-015 Motor 2 1 30 -1 Paint peeling 6 4 Medium No Action Required MOTR MOTR-016 Motor 2 1 30 -1 Paint peeling 6 4 Medium No Action Required MOTR MOTR-017 Motor 2 1 30 -1 Paint peeling 6 4 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-014 Seals 2 1 30 -1 6 3 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-015 Seals 2 1 30 -1 6 3 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-016 Seals 2 1 30 -1 6 3 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-023 Lighting Panel 3 2 25 -6 7 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 13,875 GENR GENR-008 Adaptor for Portable Unit 3 1 20 -11 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,250 ELEC ELEC-024 Convenience Receptacles 3 2 20 -11 Dirty, but functional. GFI Clean around receptacles. 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 FIRE FIRE-004 Fire Extinguisher 2 1 15 -16 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-041 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13
Discharge side pressure transmitter.

Range: 0-150PSI Replaced in 2020 2 6 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-011 Lighting 1 1 20 -11 Replaced with LEDs. Adequate Lighting 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-040 Lighting 2 1 20 -11 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-062 Flow Element 1 1 15 13 Replaced in 2020 with McCrometer mag meter. 2 5 Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-010 Structure 2 1 50 19 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments BLDG BLDG-011 Roof 2 1 50 19 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-037 Flow Element 1 1 15 13
McCrometer Mag Meter
Working Pressure: 150PSI Max Replaced 2020 2 5 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-352 Butterfly Valve 1 1 25 19 Isolation butterfly valve for flow meter bypass line. 2 5 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-022 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-023 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-024 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV. 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-191 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-192 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-193 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-004 Drainage 2 1 50 19 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FENC FENC-004 Fencing - Chain Link 2 1 40 9 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-025 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-123 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-124 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-125 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-233 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-234 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-235 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 Corrosion observable underneath peeling paint. 2 4 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-005 Water Service 2 1 50 19 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-005 Access - Asphalt 2 1 50 19 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-020 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-351 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 24 Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV. 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-021 Air Valve 1 1 30 24 2 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-282 Air Valve 1 1 30 24 2 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-285 Air Valve 1 1 30 24 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-093 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13
U/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV Heavy corrosion at
pipe connection 2 2 Low No Action Required
INST INST-094 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13
D/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV Heavy corrosion at
pipe connection 2 2 Low No Action Required
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life Adjusted Remaining Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-031 Motor Control Center 4 4 20 -12
Older components. Ambient temperature of room
higher than starters rated for during summer.

Common nuisance tripping. 9 9 High Replace $ 462,500
ELEC ELEC-093 Other (General Electrical) 3 3 20 -12
RTU Panel. Older components.

Rusting present on bottom of panel.

Clean corrosion and reapply paint on bottom of panel. 8 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 74,000 ELEC ELEC-030 System Service 2 1 40 8 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-029 Flow Element 4 4 15 -17
Same element as previous assessment. Label mostly
obscured. Recommend replacement. Replace flow meter with newer model. 9 5 Med-High Replace $ 10,238 PIPE PIPE-006 Yard Piping 2 1 50 18 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-055 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-056 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-057 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-058 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-059 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-060 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-136 Yard Piping 2 1 50 18 4 9 Med-High No Action Required CNTR CNTR-008 Controller 4 3 20 -12
PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend
replacement
Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 PUMP PUMP-017 Pump 2 2 30 -2 Actual flowrate is significantly less than rate flowrate.

Continue operating pumps to failure. See
recommendations in Table 2-7 7 3 Medium No Action Required PUMP PUMP-018 Pump 2 2 30 -2 Actual flowrate is significantly less than rate flowrate.

Continue operating pumps to failure. See
recommendations in Table 2-7 7 3 Medium No Action Required PUMP PUMP-019 Pump 2 2 30 -2 Actual flowrate is significantly less than rate flowrate.

Continue operating pumps to failure. See
recommendations in Table 2-7 7 3 Medium No Action Required LGHT LGHT-014 Lighting 4 5 20 -12 Non functional during Test.

Replace bulb or repair emergency lighting as
necessary 10 2 Med-High Replace $ 27,972
LGHT LGHT-012 Lighting 3 3 20 -12
Still fluorescents. One light out. Recommend
replacement.

Replace flourescent lighting with LEDs for more
reliability and efficiency. 8 2 Medium Replace $ 27,972 LGHT LGHT-013 Lighting 3 3 20 -12
Not replaced with LEDs. Inefficient and slow to
activate.

Replace flourescent lighting with LEDs for more
reliability and efficiency. 8 2 Medium Replace $ 27,972 INST INST-030 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -17
Suction side Pressure Transmitter
Range est. 0 – 150 PSI Obsolete and difficult to
calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 INST INST-074 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -17
Discharge Side Pressure Transmitter
Range est. 0 – 150 PSI Obsolete and difficult to
calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 VALV VALV-353 Other (Valves) 3 2 25 -7
Isolation gate valve for flow meter bypass line Heavy
corrosion/leakage on bonnet. Corrosion observable
on flanges. Not included in 2015 assessment.

Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 VALV VALV-354 D/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 -2
Isolation gate valve for flow meter Corrosion/leakage
on bonnet. Corrosion and paint peeling on
handwheel. Not included in 2015 assessment.

Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 42,734 VALV VALV-029 Air Valve 4 2 30 -2
Heavy corrosion on piping nipple from main. Heavy
corrosion on top of valve. Replace valve and piping connection to main pipe. 7 2 Medium Replace $ 18,500 HVAC HVAC-004 Roof Fan 2 1 15 1 5 5 Medium No Action Required VALV VALV-028 Pump Control Valve 3 1 25 -7 Replace valve 6 4 Medium Replace $ 31,349 VALV VALV-277 Air Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 VALV VALV-237 U/S Isolation Valve 3 1 30 -2 Corrosion, paint peeling Recoat the valve 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-126 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-127 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-128 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-236 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-238 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 SEAL SEAL-017 Seals 4 2 30 -2 Evidence of leak. Replace seal 7 3 Medium Replace $ 5,550 SCDA SCDA-007 SCADA/Telemetry 2 3 10 4
New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 6 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: City has installed new surge anticipator valve, new backflow for building service, new Cla Val PCV, replaced below ground Influent and effluent valves. Note: These are some old non close coupled pumps.

Operator Issues:
- Old Brooks flowmeter on Sensus ActionPak
- Rosemount 1151 pressure transmitters
- Fluorescent interior lights
- Non-LED exterior lights
- Building gets hot, motor overloads nuisance trip at high ambient temps, motors themselves get very hot - Autotransformer starters for pump motors
- MCC is very old, abandoned light and switch(?) within - PLC 5 controller, panel is a mess, many modifications over the decades, UPS in separate cabinet - Needs Emergency Generator
- Needs ethernet connection to fire station
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $929,894
Facility: 008 Rolling Hills Zone 2 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/15/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
MOTR MOTR-018 Motor 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium No Action Required MOTR MOTR-020 Motor 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium No Action Required MOTR MOTR-021 Motor 2 1 30 -2 6 4 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-018 Seals 2 1 30 -2 6 3 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-019 Seals 2 1 30 -2 6 3 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-032 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 -7 6 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 13,875 GENR GENR-009 Adaptor for Portable Unit 2 2 20 -12
Labels sunbeaten and difficult to read.

Otherwise functional 7 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,250 SECR SECR-023 Alarm Systems 1 1 15 -17 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 VALV VALV-026 Other (Valves) 3 1 25 -7
Corrosion/leakage on bonnet. Corrosion and paint
peeling on handwheel.

Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 ELEC ELEC-033 Convenience Receptacles 1 1 20 -12 Good condition with GFI 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 FIRE FIRE-005 Fire Extinguisher 0 0 15 -17 5 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan ELEC ELEC-094 Other (General Electrical) 2 2 20 16
DC Battery backup for RTU panel.

Old batteries, but no sign of corrosion. 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-027 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 21 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-294 Flow Clean Strainer 1 1 20 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required FENC FENC-005 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 8 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-006 Access - Asphalt 2 1 50 18 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-012 Structure 1 1 50 36 2 4 Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-013 Roof 1 1 50 36 2 4 Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-043 Roll-up Door 2 2 50 36 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-030 Solenoid Control 1 1 20 10 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-194 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-195 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-196 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-289 Solenoid Control 1 1 20 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-291 Solenoid Control 1 1 20 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-355 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 26
Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV Isolation for pressure reducing valve. Not included in 2015
assessment. 2 4 Low No Action Required
VALV VALV-356 U/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 26
Isolation gate valve for zone-to-zone PRV Isolation for pressure reducing valve. Not included in 2015
assessment. 2 4 Low No Action Required
WATR WATR-006 Water Service 1 1 50 46 2 3 Low No Action Required INST INST-095 Pressure Element 1 1 15 15 D/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-096 Pressure Element 1 1 15 15 U/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV 2 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-031 Flow Control 1 1 20 10 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-290 Flow Control 1 1 20 14 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-292 Flow Control 1 1 20 14 3 2 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life Adjusted Remaining Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-117 Motor Control Center 2 2 20 -12
Rancho Solano Golf PS Control Panel
Allen Bradley PLC-5
Input / Output List: CPU / DI / DI / DO /

AO / AI
4 Control Relays
I/O Terminal Blocks
GE MDS Orbit MCR
Esteem 192C Radio 7 9 High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 185,000 ELEC ELEC-118 Motor Control Center 2 2 20 -12 Pump Control Panel 7 9 High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 185,000 ELEC ELEC-060 Motor Control Center 4 4 20 -12
Pedestal housing circuit breakers,
motor starters and electronic overloads.

Pedestal / cabinet housing 2 VFDs: one
125HP, and one 60HP
500A Main Circuit breaker 2 conductors
per phase on line side, and with
multiple taps off load side to feed
distribution breakers:

Pump 1 Line breaker 125A
Pump 1 VFD breaker 100A
Pump 2 Line breaker 225A
Pump 2 VFD breaker 175A
Pump 3 Line breaker 225A
Pump 3 VFD breaker 175A
Pump 4 20A breaker & 12A fuses
Pump 1:
2 NEMA size 3 magnetic starters
US Motor
60HP 460V / 77A
Pump 2 & 3:
2 NEMA size 5 magnetic starters each (1
per breaker)
US Motor
125 HP 460V/ 156A
Pump 4 IEC AB starter
Sump Pump
5HP 460V/ 7.6A Panel bottom significantly corroded.

Investigate seals for leakage. Clean corrosion, reapply paint, and inspect integrity of panel bottom. Escalate to panel replacement if integrity is compromised. 9 9 High Replace $ 462,500 ELEC ELEC-059 System Service 4 4 40 8 Significant corrosion at bottom of panel. Clean corrosion and reapply paint. 8 9 High Replace $ 18,500 PIPE PIPE-160 Yard Piping 3 2 50 18 Zone-to-zone regulating piping; discharge to pond. 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-061 Lighting Panel 4 4 25 -7
Still significant corrosion on transformer. Unable to
locate lighting panel with list of loads.

Clean corrosion and reapply paint. Replacement
recommended. 9 5 Med-High Replace $ -
PIPE PIPE-007 Yard Piping 3 2 50 18 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-061 Pump Discharge Piping 3 2 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-062 Pump Discharge Piping 3 2 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-063 Pump Discharge Piping 3 2 50 18 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat the piping 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-101 Level Element 3 2 15 -17
Level Transmitter Flexible conduit not fully sealed.

Wire exposed. Obsolete.

Reseal flexible conduit to protect wiring. Eventual
replacement is recommended. 7 4 Medium Replace $ 13,875 SCDA SCDA-013 SCADA/Telemetry 2 2 10 -22
New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 7 4 Medium No Action Required VALV VALV-357 U/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 -2 Isolation butterfly valve for the zone-to-zone PRV. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 INST INST-050 Level Element 4 2 15 -17 Condition seemingly unchanged.

Clean corrosion in the short term. Replacement
recommended. 7 4 Medium Replace $ 13,875
VALV VALV-032 Pressure Relief Valve 3 2 25 -7 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 VALV VALV-091 Check Valve 3 2 25 -7 Replace valve 7 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 4,280 VALV VALV-092 Check Valve 3 2 25 -7 Replace valve 7 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 4,280 VALV VALV-093 Check Valve 3 2 25 -7 Replace valve 7 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,097 VALV VALV-129 D/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 -2
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 29,903 VALV VALV-130 D/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 -2
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 29,903 VALV VALV-131 D/S Isolation Valve 3 2 30 -2
Repair/rebuild valve, replace corroded parts, replace
valve as necessary. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 Inspection Notes:

Operator Issues:

Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $1,013,488 Selected Assets:

Facility: 114 Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/21/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
TANK TANK-003 Bladder Tank 2 1 30 -2 6 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ - PUMP PUMP-020 Pump 3 2 30 -2 Heavy corrosion on pump frame.

Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess the isolation valves to be sure there is no recirculation 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-020 Seals 3 2 30 -2 Recoat the seal, replace bolts 7 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-021 Seals 3 2 30 -2 Recoat the seal, replace bolts 7 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-022 Seals 3 2 30 -2 Recoat the seal, replace bolts 7 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments LGHT LGHT-025 Lighting 1 1 20 -12 Replaced with LEDs 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-061 Sump Pump 2 2 30 -2 7 2 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-062 Convenience Receptacles 2 2 20 -12
Room receptacles in good shape. Panel in VFD cabinet
is no longer near 480 lugs, but still close to
transformer. Recommend safety cover for transformer. 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 BLDG BLDG-014 Structure 3 1 50 18 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FILT FILT-001 Filters 2 1 40 24 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required CNTR CNTR-014 Controller 4 3 20 -12 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 WATR WATR-007 Water Service 1 1 50 18 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-007 Access - Asphalt 1 1 50 18 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-015 Roof 1 1 50 35 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-022 Motor 1 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-023 Motor 1 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-024 Motor 1 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-114 Motor Control Center 3 3 20 -14 Old PLC cabinet. Replacement in progress.

Continue installation of new PLC cabinet, and remove
this panel when complete. 8 9 High No Action Required
ELEC ELEC-056 Motor Control Center 3 3 20 -14
Replacement of MCC was in progress during visit.

New MCC present, but inactive.

Complete installation of new MCC and remove this
MCC 8 9 High No Action Required
SCDA SCDA-012 SCADA/Telemetry 4 3 10 -24
New radio installed but not cut over. Recommend
finishing cutover and removal of old radio.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 8 4 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-055 System Service 2 2 40 6 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-008 Yard Piping 2 1 50 16 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-064 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 16 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-065 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 16 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-066 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 16 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-067 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 16 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required CNTR CNTR-013 Controller 4 3 20 -14 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replacement of PLC with newer model in progress.

Will require replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High No Action Required ELEC ELEC-113 Motor Control Center 1 1 20 20
New MCC. Still being installed and not currently
operational. 2 9 Med-Low No Action Required
ELEC ELEC-116 Motor Control Center 1 1 20 20 New PLC panel. Installation in progress. 2 9 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-024 Lighting 3 3 20 -14
Still fluorescent. Recommend replacement with LEDs
for improved performance and efficiency.

Replace flourescent lighting with LEDs for more
reliability and efficiency. 8 2 Medium Replace $ 26,973 ELEC ELEC-057 Lighting Panel 4 2 25 -9
Older lighting panel. No load list. Assuming
unchanged from previous visit. 7 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ - HVAC HVAC-005 Roof Fan 1 1 15 0 6 5 Medium No Action Required VALV VALV-094 Check Valve 2 1 25 -2 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,097 VALV VALV-095 Check Valve 2 1 25 -2 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,097 VALV VALV-096 Check Valve 2 1 25 -2 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,097 VALV VALV-097 Check Valve 2 1 25 -2 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,097 VALV VALV-034 Air Valve 2 1 30 -4 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 VALV VALV-132 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -4 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-133 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -4 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-134 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -4 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 VALV VALV-135 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -4 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,872 MOTR MOTR-028 Motor 2 1 30 -4 6 4 Medium No Action Required PUMP PUMP-023 Pump 2 2 30 -4
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-024 Pump 2 2 30 -4
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-025 Pump 2 2 30 -4
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-026 Pump 2 2 30 -4
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-048 Level Element 2 1 15 -19
Did not view instrument directly, but reportedly in
good condition. 6 4 Medium No Action Required
ELEC ELEC-058 Convenience Receptacles 3 2 20 -14
Only convenience receptacle is located in old PLC
panel. 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 INST INST-100 Pressure Element 2 1 15 13
Small scratch on front, but newer model and recently
installed. 3 6 Med-Low No Action Required
BLDG BLDG-017 Roof 1 1 50 16 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FIRE FIRE-006 Fire Extinguisher 0 0 15 -19 5 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan MOTR MOTR-025 Motor 2 1 30 3 Motor reconditioned in 2020 5 4 Medium No Action Required MOTR MOTR-026 Motor 2 1 30 3 Motor reconditioned and bearings replaced in 2020 5 4 Medium No Action Required MOTR MOTR-027 Motor 2 1 30 3 Motor reconditioned in 2020 5 4 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-023 Seals 2 1 30 3 5 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-024 Seals 2 1 30 3 5 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-025 Seals 2 1 30 3 5 3 Med-Low No Action Required Selected Assets:
$133,903
Inspection Notes: All pumps have been rebuilt. New 14” effluent butterfly isolation valve and a new flow meter. 3 x 40HP, and 1 x 15hp (City indicated the 15hp pump is a waste of space) Operator Issues:

Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost
Facility: 113 Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/21/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
SEAL SEAL-026 Seals 2 1 30 3 5 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-016 Structure 1 1 50 16 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-049 Flow Element 1 1 15 13 2 5 Low No Action Required INST INST-063 Flow Element 1 1 15 9 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required CNTR CNTR-020 Controller 1 1 20 20 Installation still in progress. 2 5 Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-115 Lighting Panel 1 1 25 25
New Lighting Panel. Still being installed and not
currently operational. 2 5 Low No Action Required
FENC FENC-006 Fencing - Chain Link 2 1 40 6 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-008 Access - Asphalt 2 1 50 16 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SCDA SCDA-020 SCADA/Telemetry 1 1 10 10
New radio located in new plc panel. Installation still
in progress.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system. 2 4 Low No Action Required
VALV VALV-033 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 19 2 4 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-103 Motor Control Center 4 3 20 5
Pump 1 VFD Enclosure Model is at end of supported
life. Replace VFD with newer, currently supported model. 7 9 High Replace $ 185,000 ELEC ELEC-104 Motor Control Center 2 1 20 5
Rancho Solano Z3 PS PLC Panel
Allen Bradley 1756-PA75B
5 AC Input Modules
2 Relay Output Modules
3 Analog Input Modules
1 Analog Output Modules
EthernetIP Module
IO Terminal Blocks
Ethernet Switch
Fiber Patch Panel PLC is much newer than other sites. 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-050 System Service 2 1 40 27 3 9 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-051 Motor Control Center 2 1 20 7 4 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-009 Yard Piping 2 1 50 37 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-068 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 37 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-069 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 37 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-070 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 37 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-071 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 37 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-072 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 37 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-073 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 37 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-149 Yard Piping 2 1 50 37
Common suction piping inside building, and thru wall.

Not included in 2015 assessment. 3 9 Medium No Action Required SCDA SCDA-011 SCADA/Telemetry 2 1 10 -3 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 83,250 ELEC ELEC-052 Surge Protector 2 2 20 7 5 6 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments HVAC HVAC-014 Roof Fan 2 1 15 2 4 5 Med-Low No Action Required HVAC HVAC-015 Roof Fan 2 1 15 2 4 5 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-045 Flow Element 2 1 15 2 4 5 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-105 Other (General Electrical) 1 1 20 5 Local shutoff for Pumps 1, 2, & 3. 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments CNTR CNTR-012 Controller 2 1 20 7 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-053 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 12 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-027 Pump 2 3 30 17
Actual flowrate is less than rated flowrate.

Pump/motor recently rebuilt.

Assess the pumps for wear on the impellers and
rotating parts; assess the isolation valves to be sure
there is no recirculation.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-028 Pump 2 3 30 17
Actual flowrate is less than rated flowrate.

Pump/motor recently rebuilt.

Assess the pumps for wear on the impellers and
rotating parts; assess the isolation valves to be sure
there is no recirculation.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-029 Pump 2 3 30 17 Actual flowrate is less than rated flowrate.

Assess the pumps for wear on the impellers and
rotating parts; assess the isolation valves to be sure
there is no recirculation.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-054 Convenience Receptacles 2 2 20 7 5 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments BLDG BLDG-018 Structure 2 1 50 37 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-019 Roof 2 1 50 37 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-136 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-137 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-138 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-197 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 15 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-198 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 15 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-199 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 15 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-239 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 20 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-240 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 20 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-241 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 20 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-044 Roll-up Door 2 2 50 37 Roll up door - not included in 2015 assessment. 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-029 Motor 2 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-030 Motor 2 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-031 Motor 2 1 30 17 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required FIRE FIRE-008 Fire Extinguisher 1 1 15 2 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-046 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: Pumps/motor 1 and 2 have been rebuilt. Newer Cla Val PCV.

Operator Issues:

Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $268,250
Facility: 012 Rancho Solano Zone 3 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/15/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
INST INST-047 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2
Pump 1 Pressure Switch.

PSH-781
Range 9-300 PSI 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required
INST INST-075 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2
Pump 2 Pressure Switch.

PSH-782
Range 9-300 PSI 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required
INST INST-076 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2
Pump 3 Pressure Switch.

PSH-783
Range 9-300 PSI 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required
INST INST-077 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-078 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-079 Pressure Element 2 1 15 2 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-022 Lighting 1 1 20 7 Replaced with LEDs 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-086 Air Valve 2 1 30 17 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-085 Air Valve 2 1 30 17 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-084 Air Valve 2 1 30 17 3 2 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-008 Water Service 2 1 50 37 3 3 Low No Action Required FIRE FIRE-007 Automatic Sprinkler 2 1 30 17 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-027 Seals 2 1 30 17 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-028 Seals 2 1 30 17 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-029 Seals 2 1 30 17 3 3 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-069 Motor Control Center 3 3 20 -13 8 9 High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 INST INST-054 Flow Element 4 4 15 -18 Model is at end of life. Recommend replacement. Replace flow meter with newer model. 9 5 Med-High Replace $ 11,215 ELEC ELEC-068 System Service 3 2 40 7 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-074 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 17 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-075 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 17 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-076 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 17 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-077 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 17 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-137 Yard Piping 2 1 50 17 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-143 Yard Piping 2 1 50 17 4 9 Med-High No Action Required GENR GENR-013 Adaptor for Portable Unit 4 3 20 -13 8 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,250 LGHT LGHT-030 Lighting 3 5 20 -13 Non functional during test Replace bulb or repair emergency lighting as necessary 10 2 Med-High Schedule Near-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 22,200 INST INST-055 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -18
Discharge side Pressure Transmitter
Range 0-150PSI
300 PSI Max Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 ELEC ELEC-109 Other (General Electrical) 2 2 20 -13 Emergency transformer. Never been used. 7 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ - ELEC ELEC-110 Other (General Electrical) 2 3 20 -13
Manual Transfer Switch Juntion box specifically for
neutral lines. 8 5 Med-High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 74,000 VALV VALV-323 D/S Isolation Valve 2 2 30 -3
D/S isolation valve for flow meter, not included in
2015 assessment. Paint peeling, corrosion observed. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 29,903 VALV VALV-324 U/S Isolation Valve 2 2 30 -3
D/S isolation valve for flow meter, not included in
2015 assessment. Paint peeling, corrosion observed. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 29,903 INST INST-053 Level Element 3 2 15 -18
Readout available at station. Unable to view
transmitter at reservoir. 7 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SCDA SCDA-015 SCADA/Telemetry 2 1 10 -23
Fiber connects to Zone 5 station to transmit out to
SCADA. 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 83,250 VALV VALV-036 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -3 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 29,903 VALV VALV-040 Air Valve 2 2 30 -3 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 VALV VALV-041 Air Valve 2 2 30 -3 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 VALV VALV-139 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -3 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,864 VALV VALV-140 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -3 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,864 VALV VALV-243 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 -3 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 9,864 MOTR MOTR-033 Motor 2 1 30 -3 6 4 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-016 Controller 2 2 20 -13 7 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 18,500 ELEC ELEC-070 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 -8 6 5 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 13,875 LGHT LGHT-031 Lighting 3 1 20 -13 Performance unconfirmed. 6 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments LGHT LGHT-029 Lighting 2 2 20 -13 7 2 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-071 Convenience Receptacles 2 1 20 -13 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 SCDA SCDA-018 SCADA/Telemetry - 0 10 -18 5 4 Medium Inspect to Create Action Plan VALV VALV-037 D/S Isolation Valve - 0 30 -3
Valve below grade beneath concrete slab. Did not
observe. 5 4 Medium Inspect to Create Action Plan
HVAC HVAC-007 Roof Fan 1 1 15 4 4 5 Med-Low No Action Required FIRE FIRE-009 Fire Extinguisher - 0 15 -18 5 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan MOTR MOTR-032 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-242 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 26 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required FENC FENC-007 Other (Fencing) 1 1 40 7 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-039 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 21 2 4 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-010 Concrete 1 1 50 17 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-201 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 21 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required GENR GENR-016 Adaptor for Portable Unit 2 2 20 9
480V to 240V stepdown transformer for portable
generator, not included in 2015 assessment. 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required GENR GENR-017 Adaptor for Portable Unit 2 2 20 9
Adaptor for portable unit, not included in 2015
assessment. 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required
PUMP PUMP-030 Pump 2 5 30 10 No flow/TDH ratings on nameplate Replace. See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium Replace $ 27,750 PUMP PUMP-031 Pump 2 5 30 10 No flow/TDH ratings on nameplate Replace. See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium Replace $ 27,750 SEAL SEAL-030 Seals 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-031 Seals 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required Facility: 016 Rancho Solano Zone 4 Pump Station (Hydro) Inspection Date: 6/21/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
Inspection Notes: New Cla Val PCV and PRV. Pump #2 was rebuilt and pump #1 has a new influent valve.

Operator Issues:
- Non-LED outdoor lighting
- Indoor fluorescent lights
- Old MCC
- PLC panel is a mess
- Ongoing pump hydraulic issue investigation that has been the cause of modifying pump control panels (this is a biggie) - Main Breaker replaced once
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $911,033
Selected Assets:
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
VALV VALV-038 U/S Isolation Valve - 0 30 15
Valve below grade beneath concrete slab. Did not
observe. 2 4 Low Inspect to Create Action Plan
BLDG BLDG-020 Structure 1 1 50 39 2 4 Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-021 Roof 1 1 50 39 2 4 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-200 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 21 2 4 Low No Action Required COUP COUP-058 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 9 3 3 Low No Action Required COUP COUP-057 D/S Coupling 1 1 20 9 3 3 Low No Action Required INST INST-095 Pressure Element 2 1 15 15 D/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-096 Pressure Element 2 1 15 15 U/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-097 Pressure Element 1 1 15 15
New Pump 3 Discharge Pressure Transmitter
Installation still in progress Complete installation 2 2 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/Repai
r Cost
ELEC ELEC-077 System Service 1 1 40 37 2 9 Med-Low No Action Required SCDA SCDA-017 SCADA/Telemetry 1 1 10 7
New radio installed 2019
OIT reports to SCADA. 2 4 Low No Action Required
PIPE PIPE-138 Yard Piping 2 1 50 22 3 9 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-084 Other (General Electrical) 1 1 20 17 Automatic Transfer Switch 2 6 Med-Low No Action Required PIPE PIPE-011 Yard Piping 2 1 50 48 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-012 Yard Piping 2 1 50 22 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-078 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 48 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-079 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 48 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-080 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 48 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-081 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 48 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-082 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 48 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-083 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 48 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-146 Yard Piping 2 2 50 23 Common pump suction piping. 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-147 Yard Piping 2 2 50 23 Bladder tank fill line. 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-148 Yard Piping 2 2 50 48 Pump suction manifold. 4 9 Med-High No Action Required ELEC ELEC-079 Surge Protector 1 1 20 17 2 6 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-078 Motor Control Center 1 1 20 17 2 9 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-038 Lighting 1 1 20 17 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-059 Pressure Element 3 2 15 -13
Suction side pressure transmitter
0-300 PSI
300 PSI Max Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 7 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 INST INST-060 Pressure Element 1 1 15 -13
Discharge side pressure transmitter
0-300 PSI
300 PSI Max Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 6 6 Medium Replace $ 3,885 VALV VALV-325 Other (Valves) 2 2 25 -2
1" ball valve used for isolation on the bladder tank
inlet/outlet piping. Not included in 2015 assessment. 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 CNTR CNTR-018 Controller 1 1 20 17 2 5 Low No Action Required ELEC GENR-001 Onsite Generator 2 2 25 -3 7 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 92,500 ELEC ELEC-080 Lighting Panel 1 1 25 22 2 5 Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-035 Lighting 1 1 20 17 2 2 Low No Action Required COUP COUP-060 Reducer 1 1 20 -8 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 463 SCDA SCDA-019 SCADA/Telemetry 1 1 10 7
Fiber optic access. Z4 uses this to connect to Z5
before transmitting to SCADA. 2 4 Low No Action Required INST INST-058 Flow Element 1 1 15 15
McCrometer Mag Meter
Working Pressure: 150PSI Max Replaced 2022 2 5 Low No Action Required TANK TANK-004 Bladder Tank 2 1 30 27 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-032 Pump 2 3 30 28
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the
pump for wear on the impellers and rotating parts;
assess the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-033 Pump 2 3 30 28
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the
pump for wear on the impellers and rotating parts;
assess the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-034 Pump 2 3 30 28
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the
pump for wear on the impellers and rotating parts;
assess the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation 5 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-042 Check Valve 2 1 25 23 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-141 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-142 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-143 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-244 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-245 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-246 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-023 Other (Building) 2 1 50 22 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-043 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-273 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-034 Motor 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required Selected Assets:

Facility: 018 Rancho Solano Zone 5 Pump Station (Hydro) Inspection Date: 6/21/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
Inspection Notes: New Grundfos vertical turbine pumps and whole new skid (5hp and 53GPM). New Z4 to Z5 check valve, new OS&Y gate valves, and a new flow meter; all components (electrical, controls, telemetry, etc.) were replaced with the new pump station in 2019.

Operator Issues:

Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $107,208
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
MOTR MOTR-035 Motor 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-036 Motor 2 1 30 28 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-022 Roof 1 1 50 22 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required FENC FENC-008 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-045 Air Valve 2 1 30 28 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-098 Check Valve 2 1 25 23 3 3 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-099 Check Valve 2 1 25 23 3 3 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-100 Check Valve 2 1 25 23 3 3 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-011 Access - Asphalt 1 1 50 22 3 3 Low No Action Required COUP COUP-059 Reducer 1 1 20 11 3 3 Low No Action Required INST INST-097 Pressure Element 1 1 15 15
New Pump 3 Discharge Pressure Transmitter
Installation still in progress Complete installation 2 2 Low No Action Required INST INST-099 Transmitter 1 1 15 13 Valve Switch Reports Open/Close Status to PLC 2 2 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
INST INST-052 Pressure Element 1 1 15 -5 Suction Side Pressure Transmitter 6 6 Medium No Action Required INST INST-081 Pressure Element 3 2 15 -5 Discharge Side Pressure Transmitter 7 6 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments CNTR CNTR-015 Controller 4 3 20 0 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 PIPE PIPE-014 Yard Piping 2 1 50 30 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-016 Yard Piping 2 1 50 30 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-090 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-091 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-092 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-093 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-094 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-095 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-096 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-097 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-065 Surge Protector 2 1 20 0 6 6 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,700 ELEC ELEC-063 System Service 2 1 40 20 3 9 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-064 Motor Control Center 2 2 20 0
Previously installed Pump VFDs have been removed
and replaces with CS Starters
PLC Panel Several older components Replace power supply with newer model. 7 9 High Replace $ 462,500 PIPE PIPE-150 Yard Piping 2 2 50 30
Zone-to-zone regulating piping; discharge to ground,
not included in 2015 assessment. 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-151 Yard Piping 2 2 50 30
Tank inlet/outlet piping, not included in 2015
assessment 4 9 Med-High No Action Required
LGHT LGHT-026 Lighting 1 1 20 0 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-027 Lighting 2 2 20 0 7 2 Medium No Action Required LGHT LGHT-028 Lighting 3 2 20 0 7 2 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-067 Convenience Receptacles 2 1 20 0 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 COUP COUP-001 Other (Coupling) 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-008 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-009 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-010 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-011 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-012 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-037 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-038 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-039 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 HVAC HVAC-008 Roof Fan 2 1 15 -5 6 5 Medium No Action Required COMP COMP-004 Air Compressor 2 1 20 0 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 2,775 SCDA SCDA-014 SCADA/Telemetry 3 2 10 -10
Replace OIT with newer model.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 7 4 Medium Replace $ 83,250 MOTR MOTR-040 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-041 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-042 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-043 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-106 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 14 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-107 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 16 DC battery backup for PLC Panel 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required FIRE FIRE-010 Fire Extinguisher - 0 15 -5 5 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan ELEC ELEC-066 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 5 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-051 Flow Element 1 2 15 11
ABB Limited
WaterMaster 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required
TANK TANK-006 Hydropneumatic Tank 2 1 30 10 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-049 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-052 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-053 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-147 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-148 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-149 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: Hydro tank rehabilitated, new flow meter installed, Pump 3 has been rebuilt.

Operator Issues:
- Rosemount 1151 pressure transmitters on suction and discharge - PLC 5 Controller
- Non-LED outdoor lighting
- Panelview 600 HMI
- Emergency generator needs load bank
- Hows the hillside behind it?
- Safer Access (vehicle Pull in)
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $736,138
Facility: 015 Sanctuary Zone 3 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/15/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
VALV VALV-150 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-202 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-203 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-204 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-205 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-250 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-251 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-252 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-253 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-272 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-283 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-286 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-050 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-306 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-326 Other (Valves) 2 2 25 5
4" gate valve, isolation for zone-to-zone discharge to
ground, not included in 2015 assessment. 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-327 Air Valve 2 2 30 10
Air valve on discharge manifold cross, not included in
2015 assessment. 5 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-328 Pressure Relief Valve 2 2 25 5 Tank PRV, not included in 2015 assessment 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-329 Air Valve 2 2 30 10
Suction side air valve on Pump 1 suction pipe, not
included in 2015 assessment. 5 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC GENR-012 Onsite Generator 3 2 25 5 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-065 Level Sight Glass 2 1 30 10 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-026 Structure 1 1 50 30 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-027 Roof 1 1 50 30 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-038 Pump 2 3 30 10 Replace. See recommendations in Table 2-7 6 3 Medium Replace $ 37,000 PUMP PUMP-039 Pump 2 5 30 10 Replace. See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium Replace $ 37,000 PUMP PUMP-040 Pump 2 5 30 10 Replace. See recommendations in Table 2-7 8 3 Medium Replace $ 37,000 PUMP PUMP-041 Pump 2 3 30 10
Continue operating pump to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 6 3 Medium No Action Required VALV VALV-051 Air Valve 2 1 30 10 4 2 Med-Low Replace $ 18,500 VALV VALV-304 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low Replace $ 29,903 INST INST-094 Pressure Element 3 1 15 13
D/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV Heavy corrosion at
pipe connection 2 2 Low No Action Required
BLDG BLDG-039 Roll-up Door 1 1 50 30 3 3 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-013 Concrete 1 1 50 30 3 3 Low No Action Required FENC FENC-010 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 20 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-038 Seals 2 1 30 16 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-039 Seals 2 1 30 16 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-040 Seals 2 1 30 16 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-041 Seals 2 1 30 16 3 3 Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-011 Drainage 2 1 50 30 3 3 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-073 Motor Control Center 3 2 20 0
Sanctuary Zone 4 PS Control Panel
Allen Bradley PLC-5;
Input / Output List: CPU / DI / DI / DO / ; AO / AI
12 Control Relays; I/O Terminal Blocks; Acopian
Regulated Power Supply; Battery Backups; Convenience
Receptacles
PLC panel: Allen Bradley OIT; part of Sanctuary Zone 4
MCC 7 9 High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 ELEC ELEC-072 System Service 2 1 40 20 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-152 Yard Piping 2 2 50 30
Zone-to-zone regulating piping; discharge to ground,
not included in 2015 assessment. 4 9 Med-High No Action Required PIPE PIPE-153 Yard Piping 2 2 50 30
Tank inlet/outlet piping, not included in 2015
assessment 4 9 Med-High No Action Required
INST INST-056 Flow Element 3 3 15 -5
Flow element is functional, but model is at end of
supported life. Grounding has been left unfinished.

Complete proper grounding in the short term.

Eventual replacement is recommended due to lack of
current device support. 8 5 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-017 Yard Piping 2 1 50 30 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-099 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-100 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-101 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-102 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-103 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-104 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 30 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-139 Yard Piping 2 1 50 30 3 9 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-017 Controller 4 3 20 0 PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend replacement Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 ELEC ELEC-074 Surge Protector 1 1 20 0 6 6 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,700 INST INST-057 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -5
Suction Side Pressure Transmitter
Range 0-300PSI
300 PSI Max Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 INST INST-082 Pressure Element 3 3 15 -5
Discharge Side Pressure Transmitter
Range 0-300PSI
300 PSI Max Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 8 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 SCDA SCDA-016 SCADA/Telemetry 3 2 10 -10
Replace OIT with newer model.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel. 7 4 Medium Replace $ 83,250 COMP COMP-005 Air Compressor 2 1 20 0 6 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 2,775 COUP COUP-014 D/S Coupling 3 1 20 0 Replace coupling 6 3 Medium Replace $ 734 COUP COUP-002 Other (Coupling) 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 734 COUP COUP-013 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 734 COUP COUP-015 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 734 COUP COUP-040 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 734 COUP COUP-041 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 734 COUP COUP-042 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 0 6 3 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 734 ELEC ELEC-076 Convenience Receptacles 2 2 20 0 Common GFI 7 2 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 LGHT LGHT-034 Lighting 3 2 20 0 Functional, but old and inefficient Replace flourescent lighting with LEDs for more
reliability and efficiency. 7 2 Medium Replace $ 22,200 LGHT LGHT-032 Lighting 2 2 20 0 Still fluorescent. Adequate lighting 7 2 Medium No Action Required LGHT LGHT-033 Lighting 2 2 20 0 7 2 Medium No Action Required FIRE FIRE-011 Fire Extinguisher 1 1 15 -5 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-057 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-330 Other (Valves) 2 2 25 5
Isolation valve for zone-to-zone regulating piping, not included in 2015 assessment. 5 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-331 Air Valve 2 2 30 10
Air valve on discharge manifold cross, not included in
2015 assessment. 5 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-075 Lighting Panel 2 1 25 5 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments TANK TANK-007 Hydropneumatic Tank 2 1 30 10 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-054 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-055 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: Hydro tank has been rehabilitated
Operator Issues:
- Rosemount 1151 pressure transmitters on suction and discharge - ABB MagMaster flowmeter
- PLC5 controller
- Pump 1 panel door full of holes
- Non-LED outdoor lighting
- Panelview 600 HMI
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $606,389
Facility: 017 Sanctuary Zone 4 Pump Station
Inspection Date: 6/15/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
VALV VALV-059 Check Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-062 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-063 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-151 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-152 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-153 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-206 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-207 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-254 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-255 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-256 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-284 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-307 Other (Valves) 1 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-111 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 14 3 5 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-061 Pressure Relief Valve 1 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-208 Pump Control Valve 1 1 25 5 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments MOTR MOTR-044 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-045 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-046 Motor 2 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-083 Level Sight Glass 1 1 30 10 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC GENR-003 Onsite Generator 0 0 25 5 3 4 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan VALV VALV-056 Air Valve 2 1 30 10 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-309 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments BLDG BLDG-045 Roll-up Door 2 2 50 30 Rollup door not included in 2015 assessment. 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-042 Pump 2 3 30 10
Continue operating pump to failure; coordinate with
manufacturer to verify correct pump curve.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 6 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-043 Pump 2 3 30 10
Continue operating pump to failure; coordinate with
manufacturer to verify correct pump curve.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 6 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-044 Pump 2 3 30 10
Continue operating pump to failure.

See recommendations in Table 2-7 6 3 Medium No Action Required SEAL SEAL-042 Seals 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-043 Seals 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-044 Seals 2 1 30 10 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-028 Structure 1 1 50 30 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-029 Roof 1 1 50 30 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-014 Concrete 1 1 50 30 3 3 Low No Action Required FENC FENC-011 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 20 3 3 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-012 Water Service 1 1 50 30 3 3 Low No Action Required GENR GENR-018 Other (Generator) 1 1 25 19
Pad-mounted load bank for generator. New addition
since previous assessment. 2 3 Low No Action Required
INST INST-098 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13 D/S gauge for the zone-to-zone PRV 2 2 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-034 System Service 2 1 40 22 3 9 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-035 Motor Control Center 2 1 20 2
Previously installed Pump VFDs have been removed
and replaces with CS Starters 5 9 Med-High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 PIPE PIPE-018 Yard Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-105 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-106 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-107 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-108 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-109 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 38 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-110 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 38 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-111 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts Recoat 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-112 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-140 Yard Piping 2 1 50 30 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-141 Yard Piping 2 1 50 30 3 9 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-009 Controller 4 3 20 2
PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend
replacement
Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 INST INST-032 Pressure Element 3 2 15 -3
Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to
replace with new model. Replace gauge with newer model 7 6 Med-High Replace $ 3,885 SCDA SCDA-008 SCADA/Telemetry 3 2 10 -8 OIT is at end of supported life. Replace OIT with newer model. 7 4 Medium Replace $ 83,250 COMP COMP-006 Air Compressor 3 2 20 2
Inspect compressor and rebuild or replace as
necessary 6 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan
ELEC ELEC-096 Other (General Electrical) 2 2 20 2 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 74,000 ELEC ELEC-037 Surge Protector 2 1 20 2 5 6 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,700 ELEC ELEC-097 Other (General Electrical) 3 3 20 16
DC Backup for MCC Significant corrosion on at least 1
battery. Requires replacement. Replace old batteries. 6 4 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-031 Flow Element 2 2 15 -3
Flow element is functional, but model is at end of
supported life. Grounding has been left unfinished. 7 5 Medium No Action Required HVAC HVAC-010 Roof Fan 2 1 15 -3 6 5 Medium No Action Required LGHT LGHT-015 Lighting 2 2 20 2 One set of bulbs is out and in need of replacement.

Replace flourescent lighting with LEDs for more
reliability and efficiency. 6 2 Med-Low Replace $ 29,600 LGHT LGHT-016 Lighting 2 2 20 2 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-017 Lighting 2 2 20 2 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-359 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 7
Flow meter bypass isolation valve. Not included in
2015 assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-363 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 7
8" gate valve for tank inlet/outlet isolation. Not
included in 2015 assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-364 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 7
4" gate valve for tank drain. Not included in 2015
assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-365 Other (Valves) 2 1 25 7
4" gate valve for zone-to-zone discharge to ground.

Not included in 2015 assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC GENR-010 Onsite Generator 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments TANK TANK-008 Hydropneumatic Tank 2 1 30 12 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-065 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-066 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-067 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-068 Pressure Relief Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-155 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-157 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-209 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 7 Pump control valve has been rebuilt 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-210 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-211 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-212 Pump Control Valve 2 1 25 7 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-257 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-258 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-259 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-260 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: #3 Effluent valve replaced. PCV #1 rebuilt. Hydro tank overhauled.

Operator Issues:
- Non-LED outdoor lighting
- Fluorescent interior lights
- Pump 4 is on autotransformer starter
- PLC5 controller
- Abb MagMaster flowmeter
- Rosemount 1151 pressure transmitters
- Panelview 600 HMI
- Generator Load Bank
Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost $679,875
Facility: 009 Southbrook Zone 2 Pump Station #1 (Hydro) Inspection Date: 6/14/2022
Inspectors: Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
VALV VALV-358 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12
D/S isolation for flow meter. Not included in 2015
assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-360 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12
U/S isolation for 6" PRV. Not included in 2015
assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-361 D/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 12
D/S isolation for 6" PRV. Not included in 2015
assessment. 4 4 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FIRE FIRE-012 Fire Extinguisher 0 0 15 -3 5 2 Med-Low Inspect to Create Action Plan ELEC ELEC-038 Lighting Panel 1 1 25 7 4 5 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments MOTR MOTR-047 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-048 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-049 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-050 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-039 Convenience Receptacles 1 1 20 2 5 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 VALV VALV-069 Air Valve 2 1 30 12 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-362 Air Valve 2 1 30 12
Air valve on D/S side of 6" PRV. Not included in 2015
assessment. 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-095 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 14 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-156 D/S Isolation Valve 1 1 30 26 D/S isolation valve for Pump #3 recently replaced 2 4 Low No Action Required COUP COUP-065 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 8
8" rubber coupling for tank inlet/outlet. Not included
in 2015 assessment. 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-045 Pump 2 3 30 12 6 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-046 Pump 2 3 30 12
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 6 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-047 Pump 2 3 30 12
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 6 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PUMP PUMP-048 Pump 2 3 30 12
Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation. 6 3 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-045 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-046 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-047 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-048 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-030 Structure 1 1 50 32 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-031 Roof 1 1 50 32 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required COUP COUP-025 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-026 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-027 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-028 U/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-044 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-045 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-046 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-047 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 8 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-066 Level Sight Glass 1 1 30 12 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-040 Roll-up Door 2 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-013 Drainage 1 1 50 30 3 3 Low No Action Required FENC FENC-012 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 30 2 3 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-015 Access - Asphalt 1 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required INST INST-092 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13
D/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV not included in 2015
assessment Replace pipe nipple connecting to main piping 2 2 Low Replace $ 3,885 c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
ELEC ELEC-040 System Service 2 2 40 22 4 9 Med-High No Action Required ELEC ELEC-041 Motor Control Center 2 2 20 2
Previously installed Pump VFDs have been removed
and replaces with CS Starters 6 9 Med-High Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 462,500 PIPE PIPE-154 Yard Piping 2 1 50 32
Zont-to-zone regulating piping; Recirculation
discharge to ground. Includes 4" wall penetration and
4" screened discharge elbow outside. 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-155 Yard Piping 2 1 50 32 Hydrotank inlet/outlet piping 3 9 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-010 Controller 4 3 20 2
PLC model is at End of Life. Recommend
replacement
Replace PLC with newer model. Will require
replacement of subpanel components. 8 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500 ELEC ELEC-042 Surge Protector 2 2 20 2 6 6 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 3,700 PIPE PIPE-019 Yard Piping 2 1 50 32 Discharge piping on site. 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-113 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-114 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-115 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-116 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-117 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-118 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-119 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-120 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 32 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-142 Yard Piping 2 1 50 32 3 9 Medium No Action Required INST INST-035 Pressure Element 2 2 15 -3
Obsolete and difficult to calibrate. Client plans to
replace with new model. 7 6 Med-High No Action Required SCDA SCDA-009 SCADA/Telemetry 3 2 10 -8
Control Panel & Components:

Manufacturer: Control
Manufacturing Co. (CMC)
Part No. 3053-B3
PLC Power Supply
Model: A24H1200
Manufacturer: Acopian
Voltage Power:105-125VAC
Output Voltage: 24 VDC
Amperage: 12/40˚C, 9/71˚C
DC Power Converter
Model: 2412-2.5AS
Manufacturer: ITC
Voltage Power: 24 VDC
Output Voltage: 12 VDC
Lightning Surge Suppressor
Model: IS-50NX-C2
Manufacturer: Polyphaser
Rating: 50KAJEC801-5/ 20uS
Waveform 500 Joules
OIT
Industry Std. Remaining Life: 5 years
Adjusted Remaining Life if
Applicable: 0 to 5 years
Radio & power supplies
Industry Std. Remaining Life:

Exceeded
Adjusted Remaining Life if
Replace OIT with newer model.

Finish migration of communications onto new radio
system and remove old radio from panel.
7 4 Medium Replace $ 83,250
ELEC ELEC-099 Other (General Electrical) 2 2 20 2 Compressor Control Panel 6 4 Medium Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 74,000 INST INST-034 Flow Element 2 2 15 -3
Flow element is functional, but model is at end of
supported life. Grounding has been left unfinished. 7 5 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-043 Lighting Panel 2 2 25 7 5 5 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments Selected Assets:

Inspection Notes: No new valves or pump work. Hydro tank overhauled.

Continue operating pump to failure; assess the pump
for wear on the impellers and rotating parts; assess
the isolation valves to be sure there is no
recirculation.63 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments LGHT LGHT-019 Lighting22 20262 Med-Low No Action Required LGHT LGHT-020 Lighting22 20262 Med-Low No Action Required SECR SECR-067 Alarm Systems21 15 -362 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 6,475 INST INST-064 Pressure Element22 15 -3 U/S gauge for the zone-to-zone PRV72 Medium No Action Required FIRE FIRE-013 Fire Extinguisher11 15 -362 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-071 Other (Valves)21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-073 Pressure Relief Valve21 257 Pressure relief valve, angle pattern.44 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-074 Pressure Relief Valve21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-333 Other (Valves)22 257
D/S isolation for the zone-to-zone PRV. Not included
in 2015 assessment.54 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COMP COMP-007 Air Compressor21 20252 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 2,775 COUP COUP-016 D/S Coupling31 202 Replace coupling53 Med-Low Replace $ 606 ELEC GENR-004 Onsite Generator21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments TANK TANK-009 Hydropneumatic Tank21 30 12 Tank recently overhauled.45 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-070 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 12 Downstream isolation valve for flow meter. 44 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-158 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 1244 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-159 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 1244 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-160 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 12 Corrosion observable, paint peeling44 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-161 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 12 Paint beginning to peel.44 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-177 Pressure Relief Valve21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-213 Pump Control Valve21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-214 Pump Control Valve21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-215 Pump Control Valve21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-216 Pump Control Valve21 25744 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-261 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 1244 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-262 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 1244 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-263 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 12 Corrosion observable, paint peeling44 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-264 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 12
Corrosion observable on bolts, paint beginning to
peel.44 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-332 Air Valve22 30 12
Air and Vacuum Valves
Type: Series 35. Not included in 2015 assessment.52 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-334 U/S Isolation Valve22 30 12
U/S isolation for the zone-to-zone PRV. Not included
in 2015 assessment.54 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-335 D/S Isolation Valve22 30 12
Isolation gate valve for the zone-to-zone PRV. Not
included in 2015 assessment.54 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-336 D/S Isolation Valve22 30 12
Isolation gate valve for the flow meter. Not included
in 2015 assessment.54 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-337 D/S Isolation Valve22 30 12
8" gate valve for tank inlet/outlet isolation. Not
included in 2015 assessment.54 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-338 D/S Isolation Valve22 30 12
Hydrotank drain 4" gate valve for tank drain. Not
included in 2015 assessment.54 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments COUP COUP-029 U/S Coupling31 202 Replace coupling53 Med-Low Replace $ 606 COUP COUP-030 U/S Coupling31 202 Rubber deteriorating Replace coupling53 Med-Low Replace $ 606 ELEC ELEC-098 Other (General Electrical)22 20 17
In Battery Box over ATS:

Battery Charger
Model: 9916280012
Manufacturer: Connect Power or
Weidmuller
Voltage: 85-265 VAC
Batteries
Model: DCS - 50
Manufacturer: C&D Tech
Description: Capacity 50Ah @ 20 hr rate
to 1.75 V/Cell @ 77 ˚F
Float Charging Voltage: 13.5-13.8 VDC 44 Med-Low No Action Required COUP COUP-031 U/S Coupling21 20253 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-043 U/S Coupling21 20253 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-048 D/S Coupling21 20253 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
COUP COUP-049 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 2 5 3 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 COUP COUP-050 D/S Coupling 2 1 20 2 5 3 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 606 MOTR MOTR-051 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-052 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-053 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-054 Motor 2 1 30 12 4 4 Med-Low No Action Required ELEC ELEC-044 Convenience Receptacles 2 1 20 2
Convenience Receptacles
GFI 5 2 Med-Low Schedule Long-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation $ 555 LGHT LGHT-018 Lighting 2 1 20 2 5 2 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-072 Air Valve 2 1 30 12 4 2 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-052 Seals 3 1 30 12
Corrosion observable on pump connection and bolts,
paint peeling.

Replace seal and repair/recoat corroded area of
pump. 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-100 Other (General Electrical) 2 1 20 14 Transfer Switch for generator 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-041 Roll-up Door 3 1 50 32
Two 10'x7'6" roll up doors Roll up doors in good
condition but weather stripping has fallen off. Install new weather stripping around door frame 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments SEAL SEAL-049 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-050 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-051 Seals 2 1 30 12 4 3 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-032 Structure 1 1 50 32
Personell accessibility: 3'-4" wide single door.

Equipment ingress/egress: roll up doors.

Housekeeping: Good 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required
BLDG BLDG-033 Roof 1 1 50 32 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required INST INST-067 Level Sight Glass 1 1 30 12 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required WATR WATR-014 Water Service 2 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required DRNG DRNG-014 Drainage 1 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required FENC FENC-013 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 22 3 3 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-016 Access - Asphalt 1 1 50 32 3 3 Low No Action Required INST INST-093 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13
U/S gauge for zone-to-zone PRV Heavy corrosion at
pipe connection 2 2 Low No Action Required
INST INST-098 Pressure Element 1 1 15 13 D/S gauge for the zone-to-zone PRV 2 2 Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Asset Class AssetID Asset Subclass Condition Performance Industry Standard
Remaining Life
Adjusted Remaining
Life Inspection Notes Recommended Improvements LOF Score COF Score Risk Level Final Action Plan Rehabilitation/
Repair Cost
SCDA SCDA-001 SCADA/Telemetry 4 4 10 -7
OIT backlight life expectancy is only
4 years.

OIT standard display for all stations:

Reservoir level, Intrusions,
underdrain, influent, effluent
pressure / flows, flow direction
Radio & power supplies
Remaining Life: Exceeded
OIT is at End of Life and is no longer
supported.

Radio is currently being replaced, but has
not yet been fully cut over. Recommend
finishing replacement. Replace OIT with newer model. 9 4 Med-High Replace $ 83,250 ELEC ELEC-001 System Service 2 2 40 23 4 9 Med-High No Action Required ELEC ELEC-002 Motor Control Center 2 2 20 3
400AT / 400AF Main
Size 3 mag starter (Motors Baldor
EM2536T, 30 HP, 480 V)
P-101 Booster Pump Controls
P-111 BP
P-121 BP
TCP-001 MPP-01
Transformer 01
Emergency power receptacle 5 9 Med-High Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments PIPE PIPE-144 Yard Piping 2 1 50 33
18inch common suction/discharge piping
in basement not included in 2015
assessment. Corrosion and paint peeling
on pressure transmitter piping nipple near
wall. 3 9 Medium No Action Required
PIPE PIPE-145 Yard Piping 2 1 50 33
Pump station bypass piping on top level
not included in 2015 assessment. Paint
peeling in multiple locations. 3 9 Medium No Action Required CNTR CNTR-002 Controller 4 4 20 3
PLC model is at End of Life. Comm issues
present. Recommend replacement
Replace PLC with newer model. Will
require replacement of subpanel
components. 9 5 Med-High Replace $ 18,500
PIPE PIPE-121 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 33 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-122 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 33 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-123 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 33 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-124 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 33 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-125 Pump Suction Piping 2 1 50 33 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required PIPE PIPE-126 Pump Discharge Piping 2 1 50 33 Paint peeling, corrosion on flange bolts 3 9 Medium No Action Required INST INST-001 Flow Element 2 2 15 -2 7 5 Medium No Action Required ELEC ELEC-086 Lighting Panel 2 2 25 8 5 5 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments INST INST-090 Pressure Element 3 2 15 -2 7 2 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-003 Lighting Panel 2 2 25 8 5 5 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FIRE FIRE-016 Fire Extinguisher 2 1 15 -2
Fire extinguisher on west wall not
included in 2015 assessment. 6 2 Med-Low No Action Required Selected Assets:

Operator Issues:

Recommended Rehab/Replacement Estimated Cost
Inspection Notes:

Motion sensors are not great, but the alarm functions properly.

No work has been done at the station recently.

Station is the only facility equipped with non-Cla Val pressure control valves.

Station is the only facility with non-close coupled pumps.

AUMA actuator has been replaced with a Rotork motorized actuator ~2018. $194,250
- Fluorescent interior lights
- Non-LED exterior lights
- Abandoned meter section in switchboard (Meter was moved to building exterior) - PLC5 controller here and Reservoir
- Panelview 600 HMI Here and reservoir
- Needs Fiber connection to Reservoir replacing DH+
001 South Cordelia Zone 1 Pump Station
6/14/2022
Tyler Newman, Christian Neher
Facility:

Inspection Date:

Inspectors:
c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
PUMP PUMP-053 Pump
24 30 13
Nameplate Data: 1,900 gpm, 42.5' TDH,

11.15" Impeller
Tested Data: 1,901 gpm, 25' TDH
Pump is operating well below rated duty
point in terms of pressure.

11.15" Impeller
Tested Data: 1,957 gpm, 23' TDH
Pump is operating well below rated duty
point in terms of pressure.

11.15" Impeller
Tested Data: 1,972 gpm, 23' TDH
Pump is operating well below rated duty
point in terms of pressure.

Continue operating pump to failure;
assess the pump for wear on the impellers
and rotating parts; assess the isolation
valves to be sure there is no recirculation
63 Medium Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments HVAC HVAC-016 Roof Fan11 15 -265 Medium No Action Required INST INST-010 Transmitter22 15 -272 Medium No Action Required LGHT LGHT-002 Lighting24 203
One emergency light did not activate
when tested. Others functioned with
adequate light.

Replace bulb or repair emergency lighting
as necessary72 Medium Schedule Near-Term Corrective Action/Rehabilitation$ 92,500 LGHT LGHT-003 Lighting23 20362 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments FIRE FIRE-014 Fire Extinguisher21 15 -262 Med-Low No Action Required HVAC HVAC-018 Other (HVAC)21 30 13
Ventilation ductwork in upper level and
basement not included in 2015
assessment.35 Med-Low No Action Required
VALV VALV-314 Butterfly Valve21 258
18" BFV in basement. Valve label V-157
RIOA "Shutoff Valve" not included in 2015
assessment. Paint peeling and corrosion
on handwheel and gear box.45 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-315 Butterfly Valve21 258
18" BFV in basement. Valve label "MOV156 Pump Station MOV" with Rotork motorized operator not included in 2015
assessment. Rotork operator installed in
2018. Paint peeling and corrosion at
operator interface.45 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-316 Butterfly Valve21 258
18" BFV in basement. Valve label "V-154
RIOB Shutoff Valve" not included in 2015
assessment.45 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-317 Butterfly Valve21 258
18" BFV w/ chainwheel operator in
basement. Valve label "V-155 RIOB
Shutoff Valve" not included in 2015
assessment. 45 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-217 Pump Control Valve21 25844 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-218 Pump Control Valve21 25844 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments VALV VALV-219 Pump Control Valve21 25844 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments GENR GENR-015 Adaptor for Portable Unit22 20353 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments ELEC ELEC-004 Convenience Receptacles22 203 Exhaust Fan controls are unused. 52 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments LGHT LGHT-001 Lighting22 203
Upstairs allows plenty of natural daylight.

Adequate Lighting. Possibly replaced with
LEDs, but unable to confirm52 Med-Low No Action Required BLDG BLDG-034 Structure21 50 3334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-319 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 13
8" Gate valve, label "V-143 Pump Sta.

Bypass Shutoff" not included in 2015
assessment.34 Med-Low No Action Required
VALV VALV-321 Air Valve21 30 13
1/2" Valmatic air valve on pump station
bypass piping, not included in 2015
assessment.34 Med-Low No Action Required
VALV VALV-322 Air Valve21 30 13
1/2" Valmatic air valve on pump station
bypass piping, not included in 2015
assessment.34 Med-Low No Action Required
BLDG BLDG-035 Roof21 50 3334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-162 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 1334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-163 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 1334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-164 D/S Isolation Valve21 30 1334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-265 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 1334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-267 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 1334 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-268 U/S Isolation Valve21 30 1334 Med-Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
BLDG BLDG-046 Roll-up Door 2 2 50 33
Roll-up door not included in 2015
assessment. Rust on operator
sprocket/chain
Exercise the operator regularly, remove
rust or replace sprocket 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments MOTR MOTR-055 Motor 2 1 30 13 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-056 Motor 2 1 30 13 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required MOTR MOTR-057 Motor 2 1 30 13 3 4 Med-Low No Action Required VALV VALV-318 Flow Control 2 1 20 3
Valve label "V-142 Pump Sta. Bypass
Surge Control" not included in 2015
assessment (Singer Valve). 4 3 Med-Low Increased Maintenance/Operational Adjustments DRNG DRNG-016 Drainage 2 1 50 33
Building drainage piping on basement
ceiling (drains for main pump room).

Building drainage piping on basement
ceiling (drains for main pump room) not
included in 2015 assessment. 3 3 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-311 Air Valve 2 1 30 13
Air valve on manifold 1 discharge pipe,
includes Watts full port ball isolation
valve, not included in 2015 assessment. 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-312 Air Valve 2 1 30 13
Air valve on manifold 3 discharge pipe,
includes Watts full port ball isolation
valve, not included in 2015 assessment. 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-313 Air Valve 2 1 30 13
Air valve on manifold 2 discharge pipe,
includes Watts full port ball isolation
valve, not included in 2015 assessment. 3 2 Low No Action Required VALV VALV-320 U/S Isolation Valve 2 1 30 13
8" Gate valve, label "V-141 Pump Sta.

Bypass Shutoff" not included in 2015
assessment. 3 3 Low No Action Required
FENC FENC-014 Fencing - Chain Link 1 1 40 23 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-053 Seals 2 1 30 13 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-054 Seals 2 1 30 13 3 3 Low No Action Required SEAL SEAL-060 Seals 2 1 30 13 3 3 Low No Action Required WATR WATR-015 Water Service 1 1 50 33 3 3 Low No Action Required ACCS ACCS-017 Access - Asphalt 1 1 50 33 3 3 Low No Action Required GATE GATE-001 Gates 1 1 40 23 3 3 Low No Action Required PUMP PUMP-063 Sump Pump 1 2 30 13
Sump pump is located in basement, and
was not accessible for observation 4 2 Med-Low No Action Required c-268-40-22-15-wp-appD
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 11-13-23
Facility Risk Inputs and Outputs
D1: Facility Risk Input – Facility Capacity
D2: Facility Risk Input – Zone Demand and Capacity
D3: Facility Risk Output Results
Appendix D
City of Fairfield
PS AMP Update
Last Revised: 12-04-2023
Appendix D.1. Facility Risk Input – Facility Capacity
Facility ID Facility Name Zone Firm Capacity
ERPS Eastridge Pump Station Zone 3A 540
GRPS Gold Ridge Zone II Pump Station Zone 2E 3,000
MGLPS Upper Mangels Zone II Pump Station Zone 2C 360
MHPS Martin Hill Zone II Pump Station Zone 2D 2,800
PVPS Paradise Valley Zone II Pump Station Zone 2D 2,800 RHPS Rolling Hills Pump Station Zone 2D 2,800
RSGC Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station - 1,876
RSRAW Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station - 953
RSZ3PS Rancho Solano Zone III Pump Station Zone 3B 1,410 RSZ4 Rancho Solano Zone IV Pump Station Zone 4 257
RSZ4(2023) (2023) Rancho Solano Zone IV Pump Station Zone 4 257 RSZ5 Rancho Solano Zone V Pump Station Zone 5 134
SANC3 Sanctuary Zone III Pump Station Zone 3B 1,275
SANC4 Sanctuary Zone IV Pump Station Zone 4 540
SB1 Southbrook Unit 10 Zone II Pump Station #1 Zone 2A 1,350 SB2 Southbrook Unit 10 Zone II Pump Station #2 Zone 2A 1,350 SCPS South Cordeila Pump Station Zone 1.1 3,800
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 12-04-23
Zone Storage Type
Highest Land
use
Maximum Day
Demand
Fire Flow
Demand
Total Firm
Capacity
Zone 1 Gravity Hospital 10,575 4,000 20,900
Zone 1.1 Gravity Residential 0 0 3,800
Zone 2A Hydro Residential 65 1,500 2,700
Zone 2B Hydro Industrial 1,021 4,000 1,160
Zone 2C Gravity Residential 215 1,500 360
Zone 2D Gravity Educational 3,113 4,000 8,400
Zone 2E Gravity Industrial 33 1,500 3,000
Zone 3A Hydro Residential 8 1,500 540
Zone 3B Gravity Residential 787 1,500 2,685
Zone 4 Gravity Residential 163 1,500 797
Zone 5 Hydro Residential 0 1,500 134
Appendix D.2. Facility Risk Input – Zone Demand and Capacity Facility ID Facility Name Zone Firm Capacity Storage Type Maximum
Land Use
Zone Firm
Capacity
Max Day
Demand
Fire Flow
Demand Service Reliability Result
Service
Reliability
Score
Community
Score
Consequence
Score
High Risk
Compone
nts
Med-High
Risk
Compone
nts
Medium
Risk
Compone
nts
MedLow
Risk
Compone
nts
Low Risk
Compone
nts
Total
Compone
nts
Likelihood
Score Risk Score Risk Level
ERPS Eastridge Pump Station Zone 3A 540 Hydro Residential 540 225.773 1500 Cannot Meet Max Day Demands 5 1 6 2 6 20 37 5 70 4.6 27.6 Medium GRPS Gold Ridge Zone II Pump Station Zone 2E 3000 Gravity Industrial 3000 226 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 4 7 0 5 17 58 12 92 3.8 26.6 Medium MGLPS Upper Mangels Zone II Pump Station Zone 2C 360 Gravity Residential 360 214 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 1 4 1 12 14 6 19 52 4.6 18.4 Medium MHPS Martin Hill Zone II Pump Station Zone 2D 2800 Gravity Educational 8400 2825 4000 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 2 5 0 5 17 23 13 58 4 20.0 Med-Low PVPS Paradise Valley Zone II Pump Station Zone 2D 2800 Gravity Educational 8400 2825 4000 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 2 5 1 12 17 10 21 61 4.2 21.0 Med-Low RHPS Rolling Hills Pump Station Zone 2D 2800 Gravity Educational 8400 2825 4000 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 2 5 1 14 27 12 11 65 5.2 26.0 Medium RSGC Rancho Solano Golf Course Pump Station - 1876 - Commercial - - - - 3 2 5 4 7 20 9 0 40 6.2 31.0 Medium RSRAW Rancho Solano Raw Water Pump Station - 953 - Commercial - - - - 3 2 5 2 7 22 14 5 50 5.2 26.0 Medium RSZ3PS Rancho Solano Zone III Pump Station Zone 3B 1410 Gravity Residential 2685 761 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 1 4 1 2 11 34 7 55 3.6 14.4 Med-Low RSZ4 Rancho Solano Zone IV Pump Station Zone 4 257 Gravity Residential 797 427 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 1 4 1 11 20 13 10 55 5.4 21.6 Medium RSZ4(2023) (2023) Rancho Solano Zone IV Pump Station Zone 4 257 Gravity Residential 797 427 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 1 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 8.0 Low RSZ5 Rancho Solano Zone V Pump Station Zone 5 134 Hydro Residential 134 19 1500 Cannot Meet Max Day Demands 5 1 6 0 4 13 23 14 54 3.4 20.4 Med-Low SANC3 Sanctuary Zone III Pump Station Zone 3B 1275 Gravity Residential 2685 761 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 1 4 1 4 33 40 9 87 4.6 18.4 Medium SANC4 Sanctuary Zone IV Pump Station Zone 4 540 Gravity Residential 797 427 1500 Outage Limited to Storage Capacity 3 1 4 1 6 26 37 4 74 4.6 18.4 Medium SB1 Southbrook Unit 10 Zone II Pump Station #1 Zone 2A 1350 Hydro Residential 2700 299 1500 Cannot Meet Fire Flow 2 1 3 0 3 22 54 6 85 4.3 12.9 Med-Low SB2 Southbrook Unit 10 Zone II Pump Station #2 Zone 2A 1350 Hydro Residential 2700 299 1500 Cannot Meet Fire Flow 2 1 3 0 4 29 51 4 88 4.7 14.1 Med-Low SCPS South Cordeila Pump Station Zone 1.1 3800 Gravity Residential 3800 0 0 Meets All Scenarios 1 1 2 0 4 18 31 11 64 4.1 8.2 Med-Low Appendix D.3. Facility Risk Output
City of Fairfield
Asset Management Plan Update
Last Revised: 12/04/2023
Detailed CIP
Appendix H
C
CIP ID Project Name Project Description
Unit
Construction Cost,
dollars
Estimated Base
Construction Cost,
dollars
Total
Capital Cost, dollars(a) Source of Recommendation Risk Ranking/Score CPW090055 Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)
Implementation
Replacement of existing water meters with advanced
metering infrastructure. 1 lump sum -- -- $14,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090056
Beck and Cordelia Cross Town Tie-In
Valve Vault
Extend distribution main and Rubicon water services and transmission main interconnect (2,000 LF of pipeline). 1 lump sum -- -- $925,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090122 Cement Hill Reservoir Valve &
Mixing Improvements Reservoir valve and mixing improvements. 1 lump sum -- -- $2,200,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090057 Distribution System Inter-Tie (NBR WTP) Establish an emergency water connection between the City of Fairfield and Vacaville at NBR WTP. 1 lump sum -- -- $750,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090058 Distribution System Metering &
Monitoring(b)
Replace pressure monitoring valves (PRVs) at
approximately 18 select locations (assumes one per year).

In addition to the cost of the valve replacement itself, this fund also includes all upfront costs, such as the cost to waterproof the valve vault, replace isolation valves, etc. 1 lump sum -- -- $2,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090060 Distribution Valve Replacement Replace approximately 10 distribution valves per year. 1 lump sum -- -- $3,750,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090061 Facilities System Improvements
(PLC Controls & Telemetry)
Improvements to facility system PLC controls
and telemetry. 1 lump sum -- -- $2,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090063 Hale Ranch Road Transmission
Main Replacement
Upsize approximately 2,600 LF of 24-inch diameter water pipelines to 26-inch diameter. 1 lump sum -- -- $3,350,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090123 Heart of Fairfield Utilities Relocation Relocation of utilities point of connection from the building frontage to alleyways behind the buildings. 1 lump sum -- -- $1,500,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090064 Middle Green Valley Interconnections
Middle Green Valley development project
interconnections between the City and Solano
Irrigation District.
1 lump sum -- -- $650,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090054 Noonan Reservoir/Turnout
Noonan Reservoir is a planned raw water storage facility having the potential to store raw water from both Solano Project and State Water Project and provides the ability for multiple agencies to draw upon.
1 lump sum -- -- $750,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090005 Northeast Area Water Projects
This fund is intended to allow the City to improve portions of its system in the northeast region that are impacted by future development. It may be used to reimburse a
developer for construction costs or for City-funded water infrastructure improvements.
1 lump sum -- -- $700,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090066 Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Upgrades -
Metering & SCADA
Includes approximately 14 pressure reducing valve (PRV) improvements at pump stations, including metering and
SCADA.
1 lump sum -- -- $2,250,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090068 Rolling Hills Pump Station Power &
Pump Improvements
Design of main power, pumps, and building assessment
for Rolling Hills Pump Station. 1 lump sum -- -- $1,200,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090126 Sanctuary 4 Pump Station Power &
Pump Improvements
Pump and power improvements at the Sanctuary 4
Pump Station.
1 lump sum -- -- $575,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090124 Mangels Pump Station Power &
Pump Improvements
Improvements to the Mangels pump station power
and pumps. 1 lump sum -- -- $590,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A Table 1A. Projected City of Fairfield Capital Budget - Near-Term (2030) System Capital Improvements Quantity and
Unit
n-c-268-60-22-20-e-t7cip-cipappendix.xlsm Page 1 of 23
City of Fairfield
Public Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: March 2025
CIP ID Project Name Project Description
Unit
Construction Cost,
dollars
Estimated Base
Construction Cost,
dollars
Total
Capital Cost, dollars(a) Source of Recommendation Risk Ranking/Score Table 1A. Projected City of Fairfield Capital Budget - Near-Term (2030) System Capital Improvements Quantity and
Unit
CPW090069 South Cordelia Transmission Line Repair
(2023 Storm Damage)
Repair water transmission line damaged by Lopes Road
landslide related to 2023 storm events. 1 lump sum -- -- $1,100,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090070 Water Pipeline Freeway Crossing To abandon, replace, or realign pipelines crossing freeways. 1 lump sum -- -- $2,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090127 Waterman Administration Building Office
Expansion
Expansion of existing offices at the Waterman WTP
administration building. 1 lump sum -- -- $500,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090073 Waterman Electric Vehicle Chargers
& Parking Install electric vehicle chargers at Waterman WTP. 1 lump sum -- -- $500,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090044 West Texas Water Main Replacement
Includes replacement of the existing 12-inch water
pipeline located on West Texas Street. Utility; work is being completed in advance of the West Texas Complete
Street Improvement project.
1 lump sum -- -- $4,206,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090079 Willotta Oaks Water System Transfer
Transfer of water service for Willotta Oaks subdivision from City to either Solano
Irrigation District or City of Vallejo.
1 lump sum -- -- $550,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090071 Water Service Replacement Program(c) Replace water services at various locations throughout the City. 1 lump sum -- -- $5,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090072 Waterman Carbonic Acid Pilot A pilot project for carbonic acid at the Waterman WTP.
1 lump sum -- -- $150,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090041 Waterman High Lift Pumps &
Power Upgrades
Includes equipment replacement and facility upgrades
involving removal and replacement of high lift pumps,
outlet valves, and facility electrical distribution system equipment (including a backup generator), as well as a
new transformer.
1 lump sum -- -- $7,450,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090076
Waterman Reservoir Valve &
Mixing Improvement
Includes a project to replace critical valves and complete the design and construction of a
mixing system.
1 lump sum -- -- $2,200,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090128 Waterman SCADA Upgrades Includes design and implementation of SCADA upgrades at the Waterman WTP. 1 lump sum -- -- $1,750,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A -- $62,596,000 -- --
(a) The Unit Construction Cost is based on the May 2024 San Francisco Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index of 15418.02. (b) The highest priority valves on this list include Peabody PRV42-1, Ellis Godfrey PRVZ-2, Cement Hill PRV42-1, Manuel Campos PRVZ-2, Palomino PRVZ-2, East Tabor PRVCT1, Bear Creek PRVZ-3, Del Monte PRVZ-3, Cotswold PRVZ-3, Oliver PRVZ-2, Pennsylvania PRVCT1, Chadbourne PRV1, Cordelia PRVCT1, Business Center PRV1, Bridle Ridge PRV2, Spring Ridge PRV2, Branding Iron PRV2, and Sanctuary SC3. (c) Service lateral cost shown is estimated. An additional study is needed to refine the cost.

Total for Adopted City Budget Near-Term (2030)
n-c-268-60-22-20-e-t7cip-cipappendix.xlsm Page 2 of 23
City of Fairfield
Public Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: March 2025
CIP ID Project Name Project Description
Unit
Construction Cost,
dollars
Estimated Base
Construction Cost,
dollars
Total
Capital Cost,
dollars(a) Source of Recommendation Risk Ranking/Score
CPW090005 Northeast Area Water Projects
This fund is intended to allow the City to improve
portions of its system in the northeast region that are impacted by future development. It may be used to
reimburse a developer for construction costs or for
City-funded water infrastructure improvements.
1 lump sum -- -- $2,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090125 Paradise Valley Reservoir Valve &
Mixing Improvements
Improvements to valves and mixing systems at
Paradise Valley Reservoir. 1 lump sum -- -- $2,200,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090058 Distribution System Metering &
Monitoring(b)
Replace pressure monitoring valves (PRVs) at
approximately 18 select locations (assumes one per
year). In addition to the cost of the valve replacement itself, this fund also includes all upfront costs, such as the cost to waterproof the valve vault, replace
isolation valves, etc.
1 lump sum -- -- $10,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090060 Distribution Valve Replacement Replace approximately 10 distribution valves per year. 1 lump sum -- -- $15,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090065 Peabody Water System Transfer Transfer of Peabody water system from Solano Irrigation District to the City. 1 lump sum -- -- $300,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090066 Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Upgrades
- Metering & SCADA
Includes approximately 14 pressure reducing valve
(PRV) improvements at pump stations, including
metering and SCADA.
1 lump sum -- -- $10,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A
CPW090067 Rancho Solano 3 Pump Station Power &
Pump Improvements Rancho Solano 3 pump and power improvements. 1 lump sum -- -- $950,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A CPW090071 Water Service Replacement Program(c) Replace water services at various locations throughout the City. 1 lump sum -- -- $20,000,000 City of Fairfield Capital Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-2024 through 2027-2028 N/A -- $60,450,000 -- --
Table 1B. Projected City of Fairfield Capital Budget - Long-Term (2050) System Capital Improvements Quantity and
Unit
Total for Adopted City Budget Long-Term (2050)
(a) The Unit Construction Cost is based on the May 2024 San Francisco Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index of 15418.02. (b) The highest priority valves on this list include Peabody PRV42-1, Ellis Godfrey PRVZ-2, Cement Hill PRV42-1, Manuel Campos PRVZ-2, Palomino PRVZ-2, East Tabor PRVCT1, Bear Creek PRVZ-3, Del Monte PRVZ-3, Cotswold PRVZ-3, Oliver PRVZ-2, Pennsylvania PRVCT1, Chadbourne PRV1, Cordelia PRVCT1, Business Center PRV1, Bridle Ridge PRV2, Spring Ridge PRV2, Branding Iron PRV2, and Sanctuary SC3. (c) Service lateral cost shown is estimated. An additional study is needed to refine the cost. n-c-268-60-22-20-e-t7cip-cipappendix.xlsm Page 3 of 23
City of Fairfield
Public Utility Master Plan
Last Revised: March 2025
CIP ID Project Type(s) Process Area Project Name Project Description Unit
Construction Cost,
dollars(a,b)
Estimated Base
Construction Cost,
dollars
Total
Capital Cost, dollars(c)
Source of
Recommendation Risk Ranking/Score
NBR-NT-001 Condition-Related 01 – Operations Building Ops Bldg HVAC Equipment Replacement Replace original HVAC equipment 1 lump sum $1,110,144 $1,110,144 $1,948,303 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-002 Condition-Related 01 – Operations Building Ops Bldg Instrument AIT-106A Replacement Replace instrument AIT-106A 1 lump sum $7,867 $7,867 $13,806 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-003 Condition-Related 01 – Operations Building Ops Bldg MCC Replacement (MCCs 1M and E1M) Replace original MCCs 1M and E1M 1 lump sum $320,960 $320,960 $563,285 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-004 Condition-Related 02A – Putah South Canal Intake and Metering PSC Intake Flow Meter Replacement Replace original flow meters 1 lump sum $118,000 $118,000 $207,090 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-005 Condition-Related 02A – Putah South Canal Intake and Metering PSC Intake Large Diameter Valve and Actuator Replacement Replace original valves and actuators 1 lump sum $283,200 $283,200 $497,016 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-006 Performance-Related,
Expansion 02A – Putah South Canal Intake and Metering PSC Intake Redundant Screen Installation Install second mechanical screening system in existing open intake structure channel 1 lump sum $125,600 $125,600 $220,428 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-007 Condition-Related 02B – North Bay Aqueduct Turnout and Metering NBA Turnout Coating Repair Repair and recoat piping in vicinity ofhistorical leakage 1 lump sum $19,667 $19,667 $34,515 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-008 Condition-Related 02B – North Bay Aqueduct Turnout and Metering NBA Turnout Pipe Penetration Repair Repair large diameter existing pipe penetrations to arrest leakage 1 lump sum $157,333 $157,333 $276,120 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-009 Condition-Related 02B – North Bay Aqueduct Turnout and Metering NBA Turnout Pipe Support Replacement Repair or replace corroded galvanized pipe supports 1 lump sum $39,333 $39,333 $69,030 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-010 Condition-Related 03 – Pre-Ozonation Pre-Ozone MCC Replacement (MCC 3M) Replace original MCC-3M 1 lump sum $160,480 $160,480 $281,642 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-011 Condition-Related 03 – Pre-Ozonation Pre-Ozone SST Corrosion Mitigation Address minor corrosion at small diameter stainless steel ozone piping 1 lump sum $19,667 $19,667 $34,515 Chapter 8 Medium NBR-NT-012 Expansion 03 – Pre-Ozonation Pre-ozonation Expansion Construct 3rd and 4th pre-ozone contactors 1 lump sum $2,136,456 $2,136,456 $3,749,480 Chapter 8 N/A NBR-NT-013 Condition-Related 04 – Pretreatment Pretreatment Floc/Sed Equipment Drive Replacement
Continue regular inspection and reconditioning of
original (1988) flocculation mixer and sedimentation
basin chain and flight drives; replace equipment when
reconditioning ceases to be cost-effective, or effective in maintaining suitable performance
1 lump sum $350,163 $350,163 $614,535 Chapter 8 Medium-High NBR-NT-014 Condition-Related 04 – Pretreatment Pretreatment HVAC Corrosion Mitigation Replace corroded HVAC straps within the flash mix vault 1 lump sum $3,933 $3,933 $6,903 Chapter 8 Medium-High NBR-NT-015 Condition-Related 04 – Pretreatment Pretreatment Large Diameter Valve Replacement
Replace original valves at the flash mix area and
flocculation basins 1 lump sum $155,760 $155,760 $273,359 Chapter 8 Medium-High NBR-NT-016 Condition-Related 04 – Pretreatment Pretreatment MCC Replacement (MCC 4EM) Replace original (1988) MCC-4EM 1 lump sum $160,480 $160,480 $281,642 Chapter 8 Medium-High NBR-NT-017 Performance-Related 04 – Pretreatment Pretreatment Stress Testing Consider “stress testing” the pretreatment system by
operating one or more trains at flows of up to

Fairfield City CouncilMay 6, 2025

Fairfield City Council
May 6, 2025