Cities Index.
Agenda, first session

Fairfield City Council
June 3, 2025

Document
Agenda, first session
Meeting
June 3, 2025
Body
Fairfield City Council
Pages
745
Original file
62.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-fairfield.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CITY COUNCIL

MEETING AGENDA

Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom
Notice to Public
The City of Fairfield is committed to providing meeting facilities that are accessible to persons with disabilities and/or have language barriers. To request meeting materials in alternative formats, or to request a sign language interpreter, realtime captioning, or other accommodation, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting at (707) 428-7400.

For individuals with hearing or speaking limitations, dial 711 or (800) 735-2922 (English). For Spanish, Tagalog or other language, please dial (800) 855-3000 and provide the communication assistant with the following City telephone number: (707) 399-4010.

DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS:

Pursuant to Government Code 84308, City Council Members are disqualified and not able to participate in any agenda item involving contracts (other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), franchises, discretionary land use permits and other entitlements if the City Council Member received more than $250 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant who actively supports or opposes the City's decision on the agenda item in the 12 months prior to the date the item is on the agenda. Members of the City Council who have received, and applicants, contractors or their agents who have made, campaign contributions totaling more than $250 to a City Council Member in the 12 months prior to the date the item is on the agenda are required to disclose that fact for the official record of the subject proceedings. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign contribution and identify the recipient City Council Member and may be made either in writing to the City Clerk before the agenda item or by verbal disclosure during consideration.

Members of the public can observe the meeting on Roku City of Fairfield, Xfinity Channel 26, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99, and web streamed live at www.youtube.com/FFCATV. The public may join the meeting via Zoom at: https://fairfieldca.zoom.us/j/89060213840?pwd=UUd0WlpEMStLemcxbld4dzVMK3Z5dz09 or via phone (408) 638-0968, Webinar ID: 890 6021 3840, Passcode: 7074287400 Pages
A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
B. ROLL CALL
Councilmember Doug Carr
Councilmember Doriss Panduro
Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Councilmember Scott Tonnesen
Councilmember K. Patrice Williams
Vice Mayor Pam Bertani
Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy
C. INVOCATION - Reverend Brian Levingston of Bethel Community Church D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
E. COUNCIL REPORTS
F. CITY MANAGER REPORT
G. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
H. CITY CLERK REPORT
I. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects not on the agenda but within the jurisdiction of the council may do so at this time. The council cannot discuss or take action on matters, not on the agenda for this meeting, but councilmembers may briefly respond to statements made or questions raised by the public, ask for clarification from staff, refer the matter to staff, request staff to report back To the council at a subsequent meeting, or place the matter on a future agenda. To speak on an agenda item please use the “raise your hand” feature or press *9 on your phone. Speakers are limited to three minutes per item, as determined by the mayor.

J. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are to be approved with one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests that separate action be taken on a specific item.

Recommended Action:

To approve the consent calendar.

J.1 CM Approval of Meeting Minutes for April 2025 7
Approval of Meeting Minutes for April 2025
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Esther Beavers, (707) 428-7402
Recommended Action:

Approve the meeting minutes.

Page 2 of 745 ends

J.2 Resolution 2025-77 PW Increase in Appropriations to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget for the Solid Waste Fund
25 Authorizing an Increase in Appropriations to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget for the Solid Waste Fund and Authorizing an Update to the Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 Budget
Funding Source: $232,326; Solid Waste Fund
Contact: Corey Beavers, (707) 428-7528
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

J.3 Resolution 2025-78 PW Updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties
31 Adopting Updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Valerie Standfill, (707) 428-7055
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

J.4 Resolution 2025-79 PW Professional Services Agreement for Daily and Special Inspections
46 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Fairfield and Kennedy Jenks Consultants for the Water Treatment Plant Solar Array and High Lift Pump and Power Upgrades Funding Source: $303,786; Water Capital Projects Fund
Contact: Michael Hether, (707) 428-7493
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

J.5 Resolutions 2025-80 Through 2025-97 PW Granting Preliminary Approval of Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Engineer’s Reports and Assessments
70 Granting Preliminary Approval of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Engineer’s Reports, Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments, and Providing Notice of a Public Hearing for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No. 5 – Smith Ranch, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob Estates, No. 10 – Southbrook, No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, No. 13 – North Cordelia, No. 14 – Woodlake, No. 15 – Gold Ridge, No. 16 – Creekside at Cordelia, No. 17 – Chadbourne-Beck-Cordelia, No. 18 – Gold Ridge Park, No. 19 – Corporate Commons, No. 2023-1 (Gateway), and No. 2023-

Page 3 of 745 ends

11 (Paradise Valley)
Funding Source: Various Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Funds Contact: Chris Lewis, (707) 428-7089
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolutions.

J.6 Resolution 2025-98 PW Planning Area 5 – NBR Culvert Crossing Improvement Agreement
639
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Improvement Agreement to Construct the City of Fairfield Culvert Pipe Crossing Improvements Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Alvin Lei, (707) 428-7476
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

J.7 Resolution 2025-99 PW Authorization to Increase Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget in Transportation Fund
661
Authorizing an Update to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Transportation Budget for the Transit FAST Connect & Americans with Disabilities Act Fund Funding Source: $1,640,000; Transportation Fund ($1,140,000, Transportation Development Act; $500,000, Federal Transit Administration) Contact: Nicole Benson, (707) 434-3806
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

J.8 Resolution 2025-100 PR Contract Services for Afterschool Programs with Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District
665
Approving an Independent Contractor Service Agreement for Professional Services Between the City of Fairfield and the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District to Provide Afterschool Program Services
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Kristina Kaunzinger, (707) 428-7470
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

J.9 Resolution 2025-101 FD Requesting Industrial Emergency Council Budget Adjustment
678
Approving a Net Neutral General Fund Budget Adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget for the Fire Department Resulting from Participation in the

Page 4 of 745 ends

Industrial Emergency Council Program
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: John Sturdee, (707) 436-7228
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K. NEW BUSINESS
K.1 CD Consultant Services Agreement for a New Downtown Fairfield Property- Based Improvement District or Community Benefit Improvement District 681
Consideration of a Consultant Services Agreement with New City America, Inc. for Investigation of and Potential Formation of a New Downtown Fairfield Property-Based Improvement District or Community Benefit Improvement District
Funding Source: $34,000; Fund to be Determined
Contact: David Zellers, (707) 428-7436
Recommended Action:

Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

K.2 CM City Council Fiscal Year 2025-2027 Strategic Goals and Priorities 692 Funding Source: N/A
Contact: David Gassaway, (707) 428-7400
Recommended Action:

Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

L. PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.1 HR Public Hearing Regarding Vacancies for Calendar Year 2024 705 Recruitment and Retention Efforts for Calendar Year 2024 as Required Under Assembly Bill 2561/Government Code Section 3502.3 Regarding Vacancies Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Angela Broaddus, (707) 428-7396
Recommended Action:

Receive report and hold public hearing.

L.2 Resolution 2025-102 PD Parking Fee Schedule 709
Adding an Additional Section to the Parking Fee Schedule and Adopting the Current Parking Fee Schedule
Funding Source: N/A

Page 5 of 745 ends

Contact: Dan Marshall, (707) 428-7374
Recommended Action:

Hold Public Hearing and adopt resolution.

L.3 Ordinance 2025-04 FD Fire Hazard Severity Zones 721 Adding Chapter 8B Fairfield Fire Hazard Severity Zones Recommended by the California State Fire Marshal
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Steven Conti, (707) 428-7550
Recommended Action:

Hold public hearing; waive full reading, read by title only and introduce ordinance for first reading.

M. ADJOURN
ADJOURN TO TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2025, 6:00 P.M., HARRY T. PRICE MEMORIAL COUNCIL CHAMBER.

Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the City of Fairfield to all or a majority of the Fairfield City Council less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at City Hall, in the 4th floor lobby, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California during normal business hours.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
I, Esther Beavers, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that I have caused a true copy of the above notice and agenda to be delivered to each of the members of the Fairfield City Council, at the time and in the manner prescribed by law and that this agenda was posted at City Hall, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California on Wednesday, May 28, 2025.

Page 6 of 745 ends

Agenda Item No: J.1

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: CM Approval of Meeting Minutes for April 2025

Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Esther Beavers, (707) 428-7402

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the meeting minutes.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Minutes need approval by the City Council.

DISCUSSION
The City Council Minutes for April 2025 have been approved by the city attorney and need council approval.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
N/A

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose to modify the minutes , which will result in bringing this item back at a future date.

COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney’s Office

Page 7 of 745 ends

STAFF CONTACT
Esther Beavers, Deputy City Clerk
(707) 428-7402
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: 2025-04-01 Closed Session Minutes
Attachment 3: 2025-04-01 City Council Minutes
Attachment 4: 2025-04-08 Special Meeting Minutes
Attachment 5: 2025-04-15 Closed Session Minutes
Attachment 6: 2025-04-15 City Council Minutes

Page 8 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL

CLOSED SESSION MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 2025; 5:30 PM

CITY HALL, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
1000 WEBSTER STREET, 4TH FLOOR, FAIRFIELD, CA 94533

OR VIA ZOOM

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER

Vice Mayor Pam Bertani called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. City Attorney David Lim called roll.

Present in person were Councilmembers Doriss Panduro, Scott Tonnesen, Manveer Sandhu, K. Patrice Williams, and Vice-Mayor Pam Bertani. Mayor Cat Moy and Councilmember Doug Carr were absent.

No persons wished to speak in person or via Zoom at public comment.

The City Council and Housing Authority went into closed session on the following item:

F.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Government Code 54956.8) Property: Suisun Valley Road and I-80 (City of Fairfield ) - APN: 0027-260-230) Agency negotiator(s): David Zellers, David Gassaway, David Lim Negotiating parties: NorthBay Health
Under negotiation: Easement

Present were City Manager David Gassaway, Assistant City Manager Savita Chaudhary, City Attorney David Lim, and Community Development Director David Zellers.

The City Council came out of closed session.

Vice Mayor Bertani adjourned the meeting at 5:57 p.m.

______________________________
City Attorney
________________________________
Mayor

Page 9 of 745 ends

1 CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

April 1, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom

_____________________________________________________________________

A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Vice Mayor Pam Bertani called the meeting to order at 6:05 pm.

B. ROLL CALL
On roll call were Councilmembers Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu, Scott Tonnesen, K.

Patrice Williams, and Vice Mayor Pam Bertani. Councilmember Doug Carr and Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy were absent.

C. INVOCATION - Minister Loretta Roberson, Bethel Community Church Minister Loretta Roberson of Bethel Community Church led the invocation.

D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Panduro led the Pledge of Allegiance.

E. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Williams reported that she attended the Archway Recovery Services grand opening on March 26 at St. Stephen's CME Church was well attended. She shared that she enjoyed the employee BBQ. She commented that the ribs and food from Budreaux Cajun Steakhouse were delicious; they are opening soon at 841 Texas Street.

Councilmember Tonnesen reported that Caymus Suisun Winery will be the major sponsor for the Professional Pickleball Tournament (PPA) happening at Allan Witt Park August 22- 24, 2025, at the Allan Witt Sports Center. He shared that more sponsors are needed.

Councilmember Panduro spoke about the new mural, "Fairfield in Bloom," painted by artist Sheree Rayford at 2001 North Texas Street (entrance to Linear Park). She shared that she participated in the Indian celebration of Holi on March 14, the main day of celebration, where people smear colored powders and water on each other, symbolizing unity and joy.

She invited the community to attend the Pinwheels for Prevention event for Child Abuse Prevention Month at the Fairfield Police Department on April 7.

Page 10 of 745 ends

2 Councilmember Sandhu reported that Vanden High School's Academic Decathlon squad won Division 4 honors on March 22 during the Academic Decathlon State Championship in Santa Clara. Sandhu shared that he was on the team when he was a student there. He attended the Solano Family Justice Center's Denim & Diamond fundraiser on March 28 with Police Chief Dan Marshall, and another event honoring the Tuskeegee Airman on March 29 to commemorate and honor the primarily Black pilots and airmen who served during World War II.

Vice Mayor Bertani thanked the Fairfield Clergy Action Network (CAN) for a successful Fresh Food Festival at Anna Kyle Elementary School on March 26. They distributed fr esh food, fruits, and vegetables to 250 people. Anna Kyle is in a geographical area described as a "food desert," which means that fresh fruits and veggies are not easily accessible or affordable in that area. She invited the community to attend the Nation al Day of Prayer hosted by the Fairfield CAN on May 1 at 12 p.m. in the Council Chamber.

F. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Gassaway reported he would attend a session at the California Legislature on April 2 to give testimony in support of Senate Bill 299, authored by our State Senator Christopher Cabaldon, which seeks to streamline and speed up the zoning ordinance process. He stated there were no changes to the agenda.

G. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney David Lim had nothing to report.

H. CITY CLERK REPORT
City Clerk Karen Rees reported that the Landscape Oversight Committee is still seeking applicants for District 2 (Councilmember Tonnesen's District 2). She stated that April 11 is the deadline for citizens to apply for the Fairfield 101 Civic Academy, which starts on May

7. I. PRESENTATIONS
I.1 Proclamation Declaring Education and Sharing Day Presented by Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy
Mayor Cat Moy presented the Education & Sharing Day proclamation to Rabbi Chaim Zaklos.

I.2 Proclamation Declaring National Volunteer Appreciation Month Presented by Councilmember Doriss Panduro
Councilmember Panduro presented a Volunteer Appreciation Month proclamation to the Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano Counties, VP of Development and Communications, Kim Castaneda.

Page 11 of 745 ends

3 J. PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Tomko spoke about drivers speeding on his street, Nottingham Drive.

Jerry Woodrick asked about posting "No Littering" signs on Hilborn Road.

Phadra Ellis Lamkins spoke about the homeless population in the Green Valley area.

K. CONVENE JOINT MEETING OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Convened the joint meeting of the Successor Agency at 6:43 pm.

L. SUCCESSOR AGENCY - CONSENT CALENDAR
L.1 Resolution SA2025-01 CD Termination Document for Assessor Parcel Number 0148-540-030
There were no public requests to speak on this item.

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

M. RECONVENE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Reconvened meeting of the City Council at 6:44 pm.

N. CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public requests to speak on consent calendar items. The vote excluded Item N.1, which was pulled by the request of Councilmember Williams for discussion.

Motion carried unanimously (5-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Panduro
Seconded by: Councilmember Williams
To approve the consent calendar.

Motion Carried Unanimously

N.1 Resolution 2025-48 PW Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Understanding for Cost-Sharing of the Lopes Road and Water Pipeline Reconstruction PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: Councilmember Williams asked for Item N.1 to be pulled for discussion. Councilmember Williams made a brief comment. No one else wished to speak on this item. Motion carried unanimously (5-0).

Page 12 of 745 ends

4 Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

N.2 Resolution 2025-49 PW Fairfield Adaptive System Traffic Signal Improvement Project Acceptance
Adopt resolution.

N.3 Ordinance 2025-03 PD Amending Chapter 12.800, Section 12.804 Infraction to Misdemeanor
Provide second reading and adopt Ordinance 2025-03.

N.4 Resolution 2025-50 CM Memorandum of Understanding with Solano County and Solano Land Trust
Approve resolution.

N.5 CM Minute Action Approving Street Naming to Honor Mary Louise Marsh Approve street naming honoring Mary Louise Marsh.

O. NEW BUSINESS
O.1 CM Minute Action Approving the Mayor’s Appointments There were no requests to speak on this item. City Clerk Rees administered the Oath of Office to the following: CDBG Advisory Committee Members Verna Brooks, Elaine Clark, DeAndre Richard, Tina Werblin (Harriet Strickland was unable to attend); Landscape Oversight Committee Member Le Troi Smith (District 6); and Youth Commissioners Ariel He-Wang, and Cian Wilson (Laren Dimaisip was unable to attend).

The item was passed unanimously (5-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Williams
Approve appointments. Perform oath of office.

Motion Carried Unanimously

O.2 PW Increasing the Number of At-Large Landscape Oversight Committee Members

Page 13 of 745 ends

5 Vice Mayor Bertani asked for a vote from the council on whether they wanted to increase the number of members for the Landscape Oversight Committee by two.

She voted yes, with Councilmembers Tonnesen, Williams, Panduro , and Sandhu voting no. The motion failed.

Council requested that staff draft an attendance policy for the Landscape Oversight Committee, using the Planning Commission's policy for guidance. Vice Mayor Bertani requested that staff replicate that policy. P ublic Works Sr. Management Analyst Chris Lewis stated that staff is already working on an update to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties document and will incorporate the attendance policy as directed by Council.

Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

O.3 PW Proposition 218 Balloting Process for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts
John Takeuchi, Les Johnsen, Ms. Nosizwe Rahman, Bret Barner, Jerry Widrick, Elaine Gatka, Rick Johnson, Carol Haddock, Phil Shoemaker, Bill Mayben, Jessie Bell, and Perry Pattis spoke on Item O.3.

After a lengthy discussion, the council directed staff to release a Request for Qualifications for an assessment engineering consultant and ask the Landscape Oversight Committee to recommend the three LLMDs that should move forward with a second Prop. 218 balloting process.

Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

O.4 Resolution 2025-51 FN City of Fairfield Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 Special Tax Bonds Issuance and Sale
Director of Finance John Furtado gave a presentation. No public speakers requested to speak on this item. The resolution passed unanimously (5-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

P. PUBLIC HEARINGS
P.1 Resolutions 2025-52 and 2025-53 CD North Texas Street Business Improvement District
Real Estate Specialist Jennifer Rice gave a presentation.

Vice Mayor Bertani opened the public hearing. There we re no public requests to

Page 14 of 745 ends

6 speak. Vice Mayor Bertani closed the public hearing.

Councilmember Panduro made a motion to approve Resolution 2025-52.

Councilmember Sandhu seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimoulsy (5-0).

Councilmember Panduro made a motion to approve Resolution 2025 -53.

Councilmember Sandhu seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Panduro
Seconded by: Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Hold public hearing and adopt resolutions.

Motion Carried Unanimously

Q. ADJOURN
ADJOURNED MEETING AT 8:45 PM TO APRIL 15, 2025, TO THE HARRY T. PRICE MEMORIAL COUNCIL CHAMBER.

Mayor City Clerk

Page 15 of 745 ends

1 CITY OF FAIRFIELD

SPECIAL MEETING STUDY SESSION

MINUTES

April 8, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom

Council Present: Councilmember Doug Carr
Councilmember Doriss Panduro
Councilmember Scott Tonnesen
Councilmember K. Patrice Williams
Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy

Council Absent: Manveer Sandhu
Vice Mayor Pam Bertani

Staff Present: City Clerk Karen Rees
City Manager David Gassaway
City Attorney David Lim
_____________________________________________________________________ A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Mayor Catherine " Cat" Moy called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm.

She led the Pledge of Allegiance.

B. ROLL CALL
On roll call were Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Scott Tonnesen, K. Patrice Williams, and Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy. Councilmember Manveer Sandhu and Vice Mayor Bertani were absent.

C. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.

D. PRESENTATIONS
D.1 Budget Update
Mandrell Knight, Pastor Sam Morris, Michelle Hill, and Deborah Howell spoke in favor of keeping the BayNorth Church of Christ Winter Shelter open next season.

Page 16 of 745 ends

2 Mayor Moy made a motion to approve using $150,000 from the Intragovernmental Services Fund (homeless navigation) to continue funding the BayNorth Winter Shelter, which will open in November 2025 through March 2026.

Councilmember Tonnesen seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).

The budget meeting will be continued to May 13, 2025, study session at 6 p.m. in the Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber. The final budget will be presented to council at a June 2025 council meeting.

E. ADJOURN
Adjourned meeting at 7:54 p.m. in memory of former Mayor Chuck Hammond to April 15, 2025, 6:00 p.m., at the Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber.

A celebration of life for Mayor Hammond will be held on April 11 at the Fairfield Community Center at 11 a.m.

Mayor City Clerk

Page 17 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CLOSED SESSION MEETING

TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2025, 5:30 PM

CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CONFERENCE ROOM
1000 WEBSTER STREET, 4TH FLOOR, FAIRFIELD, CA 94533

OR VIA ZOOM

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Catherine “Cat” Moy called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. City Attorney David Lim called roll.

Present in person were Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu, Scott Tonnesen, K. Patrice Williams, Vice Mayor Pam Bertani, and Mayor Cat Moy.

No members of the public wished to speak at public comment.

The City Council went into closed session on the following item:

F.1 Labor Negotiations

Present were City Manager David Gassaway, City Attorney David Lim, and Human Resources Director Farbod Pirouzmand.

The City Council came out of closed session.

Mayor Moy adjourned the meeting at 5:55 p.m.

______________________________
City Attorney
________________________________
Mayor

Page 18 of 745 ends

1 CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

April 15, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom

_____________________________________________________________________

A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Mayor Catherine " Cat" Moy called the meeting to order at 6:03 pm.

B. ROLL CALL
On roll call were Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu, Scott Tonnesen, K. Patrice Williams, Vice Mayor Pam Bertani, and Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy.

C. INVOCATION
Vice Mayor Bertani gave an invocation.

D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Manveer Sandhu led the Pledge of Allegiance.

E. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Sandhu reported that he attended the Travis Air Force Base Annual Knucklebusters event for the 60th and 349th Air Mobility Wings. He also attended the Solano Family Justice Center's Denim & Diamond's fundraiser benefit on March 28.

Vice Mayor Bertani reported that Fairfield Clergy Action Network is assisting with the Homeless Outreach Partnership Event (HOPE) on April 30 at Liberty Church on N. Texas Street. Visit www.fairfieldclergyactionnetwork.com for more information. The regular CAN meeting will be held on April 22 at the Fairfield Community Center at 3 pm. Next, the National Day of Prayer will be held on May 1 at noon outside the Council Chamber in the quad area. Lastly, the Landscape Oversight Committee meeting will be held on April 17 at 5 pm at the Public Works Corporation Yard.

Councilmember Panduro reported that she and Councilmember Tonnesen attended the Spring Fling Luncheon at the Adult Recreation Center; they had loads of fun! She held an Adopt-A-Street cleanup recently on North Texas Street with the Fairfield Police Department. She thanked her family for he lping. She attended a Lunch Mob for the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce held in her District 5. A rep from Rosales Tax spoke to the

Page 19 of 745 ends

2 group at lunch about taxes and small businesses. Lastly, she shared that she looks forward to the ribbon cutting of the new Pet Hotel on N. Texas Street, a luxury boarding and grooming facility for dogs and cats.

Councilmember Carr thanked the Fire Department for their quick response to a house fire on his street, saving the dogs in the home.

Councilmember Tonnesen had nothing to report.

Councilmember Williams thanked the attendees of her Listening Tour held on March 22 at the Fairfield-Cordelia Library for District 1. The next one happens on April 26 in District 2 at 10 am at the Fairfield-Suisun Chamber of Commerce. It's where councilmembers and city staff answer residents' questions about projects, events, etc. that are happening in each district. On May 1, from 6 -8 pm, Ms. Williams will host a N. Cordelia Lighting, Landscaping, and Maintenance District meeting at the Fairfield-Cordelia Library to provide information and answer residents' questions.

Mayor Moy was invited to attend Chabad Solano Center for Jewish Life's Passover Seder's ritual feast on April 12. She shared that Rabbi Zaklos' daughter prepared all of the delicious food. Mayor Moy reported that the 58th Annual Easter Egg hunt hosted by the Kiwanis Club at Lee Bell Park will be held on April 19. Also happening on April 19 is the Blues, Brews & BBQ on the County Lawn in downtown Fairfield. She invited everyone to attend! F. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Gassaway reported that the VIP tickets for Blues, Brews, and BBQ are sold out, but early bird tickets are still available. Regarding the agenda, he stated that Item P .1 Public Hearing Commercial Cannabis - Authentic Fairfield LLC would be continued to the May 6, 2025, council meeting at 6 p.m., at the request of Authentic Fairfield LLC's legal counsel.

G. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney David Lim had nothing to report.

H. CITY CLERK REPORT
City Clerk Karen Rees reported that there was still an opening on the Landscape Oversight Committee for District 2. She stated that Fairfield 101 Civic Academy, set to begin on May 7, has been cancelled due to low registration. Anyone who signed up will be placed on a wait list. Lastly, she shared that anyone wanting to stay connected with what's happening in Fairfield should visit www.fairfield.ca.gov/connect.

I. PRESENTATIONS
I.1 Proclamation Declaring National Poetry Month Presented by Councilmember Manveer Sandhu and Poet Laureate Michael Wyly

Page 20 of 745 ends

3 Councilmember Sandhu read a proclamation recognizing National Poetry Month and presented it to Fairfield Poet Laureate Michael Wyly. Michael read an original poem for the occasion, "A Good Skateboarding Poem."
I.2 Adopt-A-Street Recognition
City Clerk and Program Coordinator Karen Rees recognized several Adopt-A-Street groups for their dedication and commitment to the program.

I.3 Solano Resource Conservation District Presentation by Marianne Butler, Environmental Education Director with Solano Resource Conservation District Environmental Education Director Marianne Butler and Executive Director Chris Rose of Solano Resource Conservation District gave an overview of all of the many programs that SRCD offers to the community.

I.4 Landscape Oversight Committee Update by Committee Chair Rick Johnson Landscape Oversight Committee Chair Rick Johnson provided an update on the Landscape Oversight Committee.

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Tony Mras, Mary Johnsen, and Tim Tieu spoke about increasing tennis participation in Fairfield.

Tracy Nachard spoke about the negative impacts of tobacco use in Fairfield.

Kasheef Bell spoke about a storm drain line behind Air Base Parkway that goes into his backyard.

William Ayala spoke about a towing incident.

K. CONVENE JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY L. HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARINGS
The joint meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority convened at 7:47 p.m. City Clerk Rees read the following statement: The holding of a joint meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority entitles the councilmembers to receive additional compensation of $35 for attending this joint meeting.

L.1 Resolution HA2025-02 HD Fairfield Housing Authority's Public Housing Agency Annual Plan Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Mayor Moy opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak. Mayor Moy closed the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously (7-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
Hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution.

Page 21 of 745 ends

4 Motion Carried Unanimously

M. RECONVENE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council meeting reconvened at 7:51 p.m.

N. CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no requests to speak on the consent calendar. The motion carried unanimously (7-0).

Moved by: Vice Mayor Bertani
Seconded by: Mayor Moy
To approve the consent calendar.

Motion Carried Unanimously

N.1 Resolution 2025-54 PW Pre-Authorization for a One-Time Water Transfer for the 2025 State Water Project with Solano County Water Agency Adopt resolution.

N.2 Resolution 2025-55 PW Canon Station Planning Area 5 – Neighborhood A & B Improvement Agreement
Adopt resolution.

N.3 Resolution 2025-56 PW Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant New Entryway Contract Award
Adopt resolution.

N.4 Resolution 2025-57 PW Sanitary Sewer Management Plan 2025 Update for Regulatory Compliance
Adopt resolution.

N.5 Resolution 2025-58 FN Accept Schedule of Federal Expenditures Adopt resolution.

N.6 Resolution 2025-59 FN Independent Annual Audit Services Adopt resolution.

O. NEW BUSINESS
O.1 Resolution 2025-60 PW West Texas Complete Streets Award and Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget Update

Page 22 of 745 ends

5 Assistant Public Works Director Ryan Panganiban presented Item O.1. There were no requests to speak on the item. The motion carried unanimously (7-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
Adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

O.2 Resolution 2025-61 CM Supporting Shipbuilding in Solano County City Manager David Gassaway presented Item O.2. George Kennedy and Ana Petero spoke in favor of Resolution 2025-61. The motion carried unanimously (7 - 0) with Vice Mayor Bertani stated that she would like to see robust community engagement about supporting shipbuilding efforts in Solano County.

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
Adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

O.3 CM City Council Discussion and Direction Regarding Commercial Cannabis Businesses
Mayor Moy had asked for this item to be agendized. Councilmember Scott Tonnesen and Vice Mayor Pam Bertani recused themselves from the dais and left the building due to each of them receiving a $5,000 campaign donation in 2024 from another cannabis company, The Bright Spot.

A very lengthy discussion followed. Mayor Moy asked that the discussion be continued at a future meeting.

City Council Discussion and Direction to Staff, as Appropriate P. PUBLIC HEARINGS
P.1 Continued Resolution 2025-37 CD Commercial Cannabis - Authentic Fairfield LLC
As earlier noted by City Manager Gassaway, this item was continued to the May 6, 2025, city council meeting at the request of Authentic Fairfield LLC's legal counsel.

Hold public hearing and adopt resolution.

Q. ADJOURN

Page 23 of 745 ends

6 The meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m. to May 6, 2025, 6 p.m., in the Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber.

Mayor City Clerk

Page 24 of 745 ends

Agenda Item No: J.2

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025-77 PW Increase in Appropriations to the Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 Budget for the Solid Waste Fund

Authorizing an Increase in Appropriations to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget for the Solid Waste Fund and Authorizing an Update to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget

Funding Source: $232,326; Solid Waste Fund

Contact: Corey Beavers, (707) 428-7528

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Solid Waste Fund 156 encompasses various solid waste programs and grants that the City manages to ensure compliance with state regulations. The Public Works’ Solid Waste Division obtains grant funding from the California Department of Resource s Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and receives franchise payments from the City’s waste hauler, Republic Services, to finance these programs. These two funding sources, CalRecycle and Republic Services, comprise the majority of the Solid Waste program’s revenue and are separate from the General Fund. Each grant and special program is assigned a unique project code, and the funds received are allocated to specific accounts.

Due to an administrative oversight, some planned expenses for successfully awarded grant funds and annual franchise fees were not budget ed in the previously approved budget for fiscal year (FY) 2024-2025. As a result, these funds are unavailable for their intended programs, despite having a sufficient fund balance. Staff are requesting a total increase in appropriation s of $232,326 to the FY 2024 -2025 budget for the respective programs in Fund 156 , ensuring legislative compliance and facilitating the expenditure of these dedicated funds.

Page 25 of 745 ends

DISCUSSION
The Solid Waste Division receives grant funding from CalRecycle and annual payments through the City’s franchise agreement with Republic Services to support various solid waste programs that ensure compliance with state regulations. To help jurisdictions meet these regulations, CalRecycle offers various grants for which the City applies . These grants include the Used Oil Payment Program (OPP) , the City/County Payment Program (CCPP) , and th e Senate Bill 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program (OWR). In addition to these grants, the Solid Waste Division also collects franchise fees and payments as specified in the franchise agreement with Republic Services. These payments include the Vehicle Road Impact Fee, the SB 1383 Reporting Program Contribution, and the Edible Food Recovery (EFR) Program Contribution. Together, these grant funds and franchise fees represent the majority of the revenue for the Solid Waste Program, enabling it to operate without relying on the General Fund.

Due to an administrative oversight, some planned expenses for the grant funds and franchise fees for FY 2024-2025 were not budgeted, preventing the funds from being utilized for multiple projects, despite their availability. The impacted accounts include: Edible Food Recovery (Project 10370); Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) Local Assistance Grant Organic Wast e Recycling 1 Project 10373); Household Hazardous Waste Program (Project 10374); City/County Payment Program FY 2022-2023 (Project 10467); Used Oil Payment Program Cycle 14 (Project 10596); Senate Bill 1383 Local Assistance Grant OWR 4 (Project 10604); and the City/County Payment Program Cycle FY 2023-2024 (Project 10605). A brief description of each project and requested budget adjustment as follows:

Edible Food Recovery Program (EFRP) - Project 10370:

Senate Bill 1383 regulations require jurisdictions to establish an EFR P to collect food that would otherwise be discarded. The City entered into an agreement with the County to administer the EFRP. Funding for this program is provided annually through the City’s franchise agreement with Republic Services and is deposited into Project 10370. For FY 2024-2025, the City received $41,182. Staff requests an increase in appropriations of $45,000 for the FY 2024-2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses. The budget increase will be covered by the FY 2024 -2025 Republic Service annual payment and the available fund balance.

SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Organic Waste Recycling 1 (OWR1) - Project 10373:

The SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program OWR1 supports the implementation of organic waste regulations. The City was awarded $167,333 for this purpose, which was used for educational campaigns, waste receptacles, and compost procurement. Of the awarded amount, $87,765 was budgeted for expenses in FY 2024-2025. Staff requests an increase in appropriations of $18,830 to the FY 2024-2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses. The budget increase will be covered by the SB 1383 grant award.

Household Hazardous Waste Program (HHW) - Project 10374:

The City receives annual contributions from the Fairfield -Suisun Sewer District (FSSD) through a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to support the HHW Program. These funds are passed through to Republic Services for the collection and disposal of HHW. For FY 2024-2025, the City

Page 26 of 745 ends

received $57,301, and the project was budgeted at $51,000, leaving a remaining unbudgeted balance of $6,301. Staff requests an increase in appropriations of $6,301 to the FY 2024-2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses . The budget increase will be covered by the remaining FSSD contribution.

City/County Payment Program (CCPP) FY 2022-2023 - Project 10467:

CalRecycle offers the CCPP to help maintain an 80% recycling rate for beverage containers. The City received $30,112 for FY 2022-2023 and deposited these funds into Project 10467. Staff requests an increase in appropriations of $16,657 to the FY 2024-2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses. The budget increase will be covered by the CalRecycle payment.

Used Oil Payment Program (OPP) Cycle 14- Project 10596:

The OPP supports activities related to the collection and recycling of used oil and oil filters. The City was awarded $16,528 for Cycle 14, which was deposited into Project 10596. Staff requests an increase in appropriations of $16,528 to the FY 2024-2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses. The budget increase will be covered by the total OPP award.

SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Organic Waste Recycling 4 (OWR4) - Project 10604:

CalRecycle offered the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program OWR4 to help jurisdictions implement organic waste regulations. The grant term concludes in March 2026, and the City was awarded $317,573 to use for various program elements, including educational campaigns, staffing, and compost procurement. Staff requests an increase in appropriations of $118,010 to the FY 2024 -2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses . The budget increase will be covered by the CalRecycle SB 1383 grant.

City/County Payment Program FY 2023-2024 - Project 10605:

The CCPP FY 2023-2024 grant term is from March 2025 to March 2026. Grant funds will support Solano Resource Conservation District’s Watershed Explorer program and purchase water refill stations. The City was awarded $30,206, and staff requests an increase in appropriations of $11,000 to the FY 2024-2025 project budget to pay for planned expenses. The budget increase will be covered by the CCPP grant.

The requested increases in appropriations are essential to ensure that the City remains compliant with state regulations, efficiently manages the programs, and uses the designated funds as intended. Staff requests approval for these one -time budget adjustments to ensure that these critical programs can proceed as planned and fulfill their objectives for the current fiscal year.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total authorization for an increase in appropriations to the FY 2024-2025 budget for the Solid Waste Fund (Fund 156) is $232,326 for the following projects: Project No. 10370 - Solid Waste EFR Fund ($45,000), Project No. 10373 - Senate Bill 1383 Local Assistance Grant Fund OWR 1 ($18,830); Project No. 10374 - HHW Fund ($6,301); Project No. 10467 - CCPP FY 2022 -2023 ($16,657); Project No. 10596 - OPP Cycle 14 ($16,528), Project No. 10604 - Senate Bill Local Assistance Grant Fund OWR4 ($118,010), and Project No. 10605 - CCPP 23/24 ($11,000). This

Page 27 of 745 ends

action corrects the administrative oversight and allocates funds to the appropriate projects from the overall Solid Waste Fund (Fund 156) that holds all the grant money. No other funds are affected.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose to postpone the requested action and reconvene with staff for alternative funding sources.

COORDINATED WITH
Finance Department

STAFF CONTACT
Corey Beavers, Management Analyst II
(707) 428-7528
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Proposed Resolution

Page 28 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-77

AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN APPROPRIATIONS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 BUDGET FOR SOLID WASTE FUND AND AUTHORIZING AN UPDATE TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 BUDGET

WHEREAS, the Public Works’ Solid Waste Division administers various solid waste programs funded by grants from the California Department of Resource s Recovery and Recycling (CalRecycle) and franchise payments from the City’s waste hauler, Republic Services; and

WHEREAS, due to an administrative oversight, some planned expenses for successfully awarded grant funds and franchise fees were not budget ed in the previously approved fiscal year (FY) 2024-2025 budget, preventing the use of these funds for their intended programs; and

WHEREAS, the funds involved include allocations for the Edible Food Recovery Program, Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) Reporting Program, SB 1383 Local Assistance Grants Organic Waste Recycle 1 and Organic Waste Recycle 4), Household Hazardous Waste Program, the City/County Payment Program, and the Used Oil Payment Program, all of which support important solid waste and environmental programs that ensure compliance with state regulations; and

WHEREAS, the revised approp riation constitutes an update to the FY 2024 -2025 Budget approved pursuant to Resolution 2024-133.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The City Council authorizes a n budget adjustment to increase appropriations to the FY 2024-2025 budget for the Solid Waste Fund (Fund 156) for the following projects: $45,000 for the Edible Food Recovery Program (Project 10370) ; $37,566 for the Senate Bill 1383 Reporting Program (Project 10371); $18,830 for the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant OWR 1 (Project 10373); $6,301 for the Household Hazardous Waste Program (Project 10374) ; $30,112 for the City/County Payment Program FY 22/23 (Project 10467) ; $16,528 for the Used Oil Payment Program Cycle 14 (Project 10596) ; $255,000 for the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant OWR 4 (Project 10604).

Section 2. The city manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to implement these budget adjustments to ensure proper allocation of the funds to their respective programs and to ensure the City’s compliance with relevant state regulations.

Page 29 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-77

Page 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

Page 30 of 745 ends

Agenda Item No: J.3

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025 -78 PW Updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties

Adopting Updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee

Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Valerie Standfill, (707) 428-7055

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The adoption of the attached resolution will approve updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee that was established with Resolution No. 2023-26.

DISCUSSION
The C ity C ouncil adopted Resolution No. 2023-26 (Attachment 2 ) establishing the Fairfield Landscape Oversight Committee and Setting Forth Guidelines and Duties of the Committee.

At the request of the Committee, City staff collaborated with the Committee to further clarify and expand upon its roles and responsi bilities. In addition, the Committee expressed the need for a formal attendance policy to ensure consistent member participation. Staff worked in partnership with the Committee to review and develop proposed amendments during the Committee’s meetings on Fe bruary 27, 2025, and March 20, 2025. During these meetings, members requested additional guidance and reiterated the importance of an attendance standard.

Page 31 of 745 ends

At the April 1, 2025, City Council meeting, the council directed staff to incorporate an attendance policy consistent with those applied to other City committees and commissions.

The proposed revised guidelines (Attachment 4), including the attendance policy, were reviewed and approved by the Landscape Oversight Committee at its special meeting on April 17, 2025.

The adoption of the attached resolution will establish updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee as proposed in Attachment 5.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
N/A

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
The Landscape Oversight Committee and staff reviewed and developed proposed edits of the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee at the February 27 and March 20, 2025 , meetings. The proposed revised guidelines, including the attend ance policy, were reviewed and approved by the Landscape Oversight Committee at its special meeting on April 17, 2025.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose not to approve the proposed updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties or may direct staff to make additional revisions prior to adoption.

COORDINATED WITH
Landscape Oversight Committee

STAFF CONTACT
Valerie Standfill, Management Analyst
(707) 428-7055
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3: Resolution No. 2023-26
Attachment 4: Proposed Exhibit “A” with Markup
Attachment 5: Proposed Exhibit “A” without Markup

Page 32 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-78

ADOPTING UPDATES TO THE LANDSCAPE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE GUIDELINES AND DUTIES

OF THE COMMITTEE

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-26 Establishing the Fairfield Landscape Oversight Committee and Setting Forth Guidelines and Duties of the Committee; and

WHEREAS, the Landscape Oversight Committee and City staff collaborated during the February 27, 2025, and March 20, 2025, Landscape Oversight Committee meetings to prepare the final proposed edits to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee Exhibit “A;” and

WHEREAS, at the April 1, 2025, council meeting, the council de termined that the Landscape Oversight Committee shall be subject to the same attendance policy followed by other City committees and commissions and directed staff to incorporate the policy into Exhibit “A;” and

WHEREAS, at the April 17, 2025, Landscape Oversight Committee special meeting, the Landscape Oversight Committee reviewed and approved the Proposed Exhibit “A.”

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The council hereby approves the updated Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties of the Committee, set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

Page 33 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2023- 26

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD ESTABLISHING THE FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND SETTING FORTH GUIDELINES AND DUTIES OF THE

COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to form the Landscape Oversight Committee and establish terms, guidelines, and duties of the Landscape Oversight Committee.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The council hereby establishes a seven -member oversight committee, which will have a representative from each of the six districts and one at - large representative.

Section 2. The council hereby approves the Landscape Committee Guidelines and Duties, set forth in Exhibit " A" attached hereto.

PASSEDAND ADOPTED this 215tday of February, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES
NOES
COUNCILMEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /+ A+ 494.i* 6 / TONNESEN / VAGG4RG / WILLIAMS COUNCILMEMBERS: Now
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: PCk,') kCYJ . vCACCC,(_()
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK
Iv0V Q'

Page 34 of 745 ends

Exhibit " A"

LANDSCAPE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE GUIDELINES AND DUTIES
The City Council of the City of Fairfield hereby establishes a Landscape Oversight Committee Committee) to provide fiscal oversight and review of the Public Works Department' s management of landscaping throughout the city. A primary focus of the Committee will be to improve effectiveness, transparency, and financial oversight of the 16 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts ( LLMD or Districts). The Committee will review the annual budgets, projected expenditures, assessment levels and provide management oversight.

Application/ Recruitment Process:

The standard recruitment process that is used for all other existing City boards, commissions and committees will be utilized to conduct the recruitment of applications for the Committee.

Notice of these vacancies will be advertised in the Fairfield Daily Republic newspaper, posted on the City' s website, and posted on the Civic Center complex meeting notice boards.

Powers and Duties:

The Committee will provide independent oversight of the operation and financial aspects of the LLDMs, and for landscape maintenance in non- LLMD areas, throughout the city and will report directly to the council. The Committee will ensure effectiveness, transparency, review of the managerial processes over the Landscape Districts and non- LLMD landscaped areas throughout the City, and provide oversight of the revenue generated by the LLMDs, as well as general fund revenues specifically budgeted for landscape maintenance in non- LLMD areas throughout the city Enterprise fund and other funds generated by the city are outside the purview of the Committee.

The Committee, together with staff, will educate district residents as to the operation and function of LLMDs and the associated costs to maintain and improve such districts. Duties may consist of reviewing the annual budget and any other City financial reports necessary to advise the council. The Committee will work with city staff to provide management oversight of the landscape maintenance for the various Districts and non- LLMD landscaped areas throughout the City.

The duties of the Committee do not include decision - making responsibilities regarding spending priorities, funding source decisions, or financing plans. The Committee serves in an advisory - only role to the council, limited to the review of the managerial processes over the Landscape Districts and non- LLMD landscaped areas throughout the City and the use of LLMD revenues, as well as general fund revenues specifically budgeted for landscape maintenance in non- LLMD areas.

Page 35 of 745 ends

Exhibit " A"

Page 2 ends

Qualifications for Appointment:

The committee will consist of seven members.

Six of the seven committee members shall be comprised of one person that has residency within the respective council district area.

One committee member will be at - large.

Residency may be verified annually by the city clerk' s office through ( 1) voter registration or ( 2) utility bills ( phone, water, cable).

Selection of Members:

The Committee will be composed of seven members. Candidates for the Committee shall complete and submit applications to the City per instructions on the vacancy advertisement. The mayor and city council will appoint their respective Committee members.

Term of Service:

Each term shall be for a period of five years.

Meetings:

The Committee will meet quarterly and provide reports to council on a quarterly basis. The Committee will be subject to the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. Meetings must be noticed and open to the public. Committee minutes and reports are a matter of public record and may be posted on the City' s website. Additional meetings may be scheduled as necessary. All Committee members shall attend training and orientation prior to the first regular Committee meeting, including Brown Act training and AB1234 Ethics Training. Committee members are expected to attend all regular Committee meetings.

Failure of the committee members to attend the meetings may result in removal from the Committee at the discretion of the council. Committee decisions and actions require a simple majority vote of those members in attendance. The quorum requirement for any meeting shall be a minimum of four members.

Staff Liaison Appointment:

The Assistant Director of Public Works and/ or his designee will serve as staff liaison( s) to the Committee. The liaison( s) will be responsible for providing relevant information to the Committee. The liaison( s) will prepare, post, and distribute agendas and take minutes at each meeting. The liaison (s) will provide the minutes of the Committee' s proceedings to the council and the public.

Page 36 of 745 ends

1 (PROPOSED EXHIBIT “A” WITH MARKUP)

LANDSCAPE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE GUIDELINES AND DUTIES

The City Council of the City of Fairfield hereby establishes a Landscape Oversight CommiƩee (CommiƩee) to provide fiscal oversight and review of the Public Works Department’s management of landscaping throughout the city. A primary focus of the The CommiƩee’s primary focus will be to improve the effecƟveness, transparency, and financial oversight management of the City’s landscape maintenance. 16 Landscaping and LighƟng Maintenance Districts (LLMD or Districts). The CommiƩee will review the annual budgets, projected expenditures, assessment levels and provide management oversight.

ApplicaƟon/ Recruitment Process:

The standard recruitment process that is used for all other exisƟng City boards, commissions and commiƩees will be uƟlized to conduct the recruitment of applicaƟons for the CommiƩee.

NoƟce of these vacancies will be adverƟsed in the Fairfield Daily Republic newspaper, posted on the City’s website, and posted on the Civic Center complex meeƟng noƟce boards.

Powers and DuƟes:

The CommiƩee will provide independent oversight of the operaƟonal and financial aspects of the LLDMs, and for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas, all Landscaping and LighƟng Maintenance Districts (LLMDs) and non-LLMD landscape areas paid for by the General Fund (herein “non-LLMD areas”). throughout the city and will report directly to the council. DuƟes shall consist of reviewing the annual budget and any other City financial reports necessary to advise the council. The CommiƩee will report directly to the council. The CommiƩee will ensure effecƟveness, transparency, review of the managerial processes over the Landscape Districts and non-LLMD landscaped areas throughout the City, and provide oversight of the revenue generated by the LLMDs, as well as general fund revenues specifically budgeted for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas throughout the city Enterprise fund and other funds generated by the city outside of the purview of the CommiƩee.

Key responsibiliƟes include reviewing managerial processes, ensuring transparency and effecƟveness, and examining the use of LLMD revenues and General Fund revenues, specifically allocated for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas. Landscape maintenance that is funded by Enterprise funds and other funding sources are excluded from the CommiƩee’s purview.

The CommiƩee, together with staff, will educate district District residents as to the operaƟon and funcƟon of LLMDs and the associated costs to maintain and improve such districts. The CommiƩee serves in an advisory-only role to the council limited to:

Page 37 of 745 ends

2 1. The review of operaƟonal and financial aspects of LLMD and non-LLMD landscaped areas throughout the city.

2. The review of the use of LLMD revenues (such as assessments, interest earned, general fund contribuƟons and/or loans) and General Fund revenues specifically budgeted for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas.

1.3. EducaƟng residents about the operaƟon and funcƟon of LLMDs.DuƟes may consist of reviewing the annual budget and any other City financial reports necessary to advise the council. The CommiƩee will work with city staff to provide management oversight of the landscape maintenance for the various Districts and non-LLMD landscaped areas throughout the City.

The duƟes of the CommiƩee do not include decision-making responsibiliƟes regarding:
 spending prioriƟes, ;
 funding source decisions, ;
 or financing plans. ;
 operaƟonal or managerial processes;
 contractor selecƟon or management; or
 any other decision-making responsibiliƟes that pertain to exisƟng processes, procedures, or policies regarding the City’s landscaping. The CommiƩee services in an advisory-only role to the council, limited to the review of the managerial processes over the Landscape Districts and non-LLMD landscaped areas throughout the City and the use of LLMD revenues, as well as general fund revenues specifically budgeted for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas.

QualificaƟons for Appointment:

The commiƩee CommiƩee will consist of seven members.
 Six of the seven commiƩee CommiƩee members Members shall be comprised of one person that haswith residency within the respecƟve council district area.  One commiƩee CommiƩee member Member will be at-large.  Residency may be verified annually by the cCity cClerk's oOffice through (1) voter registraƟon or (2) uƟlity bills (phone, water, cable).

SelecƟon of Members:

The CommiƩee will be composed of seven members. Candidates for the CommiƩee shall complete and submit applicaƟons to the City per instrucƟons on the vacancy adverƟsement. The mayor and city council will appoint their respecƟve CommiƩee membersMembers.

Page 38 of 745 ends

3 All CommiƩee Members shall aƩend orientaƟon and training, including the Brown Act and AB1234 Ethics Training, prior to their first regular CommiƩee meeƟng.

Terms of Service:

Each CommiƩee Member term shall be for a period of five years.

ElecƟon of CommiƩee Chair and Vice Chair:

The CommiƩee shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair at the first meeƟng of the calendar year with a simple majority vote of the CommiƩee Members in aƩendance. The Chair and Vice Chair shall serve a one-year term; however, incumbents may be elected to serve addiƟonal consecuƟve or non-consecuƟve terms.

MeeƟngs:

Schedule and DuraƟon: The CommiƩee will shall adopt an annual regular meeƟng schedule no later than the last meeƟng of the preceding calendar year. Regular meeƟngs shall be held on a quarterly basis for approximately two hours each meeƟng. AddiƟonal special meeƟngs may be scheduled as necessary. meet quarterly and provide reports to council on a quarterly basis.

Quorum: The quorum requirement for any meeƟng shall be a minimum of four members. If the quorum requirement is not met by 10 minutes aŌer the scheduled start Ɵme (15 minutes with noƟficaƟon to the staff liaison) the meeƟng shall be cancelled.

Guidelines: The CommiƩee will beis subject to the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. MeeƟngs must shall be noƟced and open to the public. CommiƩee meeƟng minutes and reports are a maƩer of public record. DraŌ meeƟng minutes and may shall be posted on the City’s website no later than 21 calendar days aŌer conclusion of the meeƟng. AddiƟonal meeƟngs may be scheduled as necessary. All CommiƩee members shall aƩend training and orientaƟon prior to the first regular CommiƩee meeƟng, including Brown Act training and AB1234 Ethics Training.

CommiƩee members are expected to aƩend all regular CommiƩee meeƟngs.

VoƟng: CommiƩee decisions and acƟons require a simple majority vote of those CommiƩee Members in aƩendance.

AƩendance: A CommiƩee Member may have a maximum of two unexcused absences in any twelve-month period. Absences exempt from this SecƟon include:

1. Absences due to medical or family emergencies.

2. Absences due to unforeseen and urgent circumstances.

3. Absences approved in advance by the chairperson or staff liaison.

Page 39 of 745 ends

4 In the case of a medical or family emergency, or due to unforeseen and urgent circumstances, a commissioner shall noƟfy the chairperson or staff liaison in wriƟng within 30 days of their absence to request an exempƟon.

If a CommiƩee Member incurs a third non-exempt absence during any twelve-month period, the CommiƩee Member will be deemed to have resigned their posiƟon and shall no longer be a member of the commiƩee.

The staff liaison shall issue a leƩer to the CommiƩee Member, with a copy to the Mayor, noƟfying them that they have exceeded the number of absences allowed under this policy, and have therefore resigned their posiƟon. The leƩer shall be personally served to the CommiƩee Member or sent via first-class United States Postal Service (USPS) mail, return receipt requested. Upon personal service or return of the USPS mail receipt, the commiƩee seat held by the CommiƩee Member shall be deemed vacant.

Having received the noƟce, the CommiƩee Member shall have 10 business days to request an appeal of this secƟon before the City Council. The CommiƩee Member shall submit their request for appeal in wriƟng (either via e-mail, hand delivery, or USPS mail) to the city clerk. The city clerk shall set the appeal hearing at a regular or special meeƟng of the city council within 45 business days from receiving the request for a hearing from the CommiƩee Member.

If the CommiƩee Member fails to submit the request for a right of appeal within 10 business days, the posiƟon shall be deemed vacant.

At an appeal hearing brought by a CommiƩee Member under this secƟon, the council shall allow the CommiƩee Member to address the council to explain their absences and provide any documents or other evidence to support their appeal. The council may consider any evidence it deems necessary to make its decision. Following the hearing, by a majority vote the council may affirm the removal of the CommiƩee Member or vote to reinstate the CommiƩee Member to their posiƟon on the commiƩee. In the case of a Ɵe vote by the council, the removal of the CommiƩee Member under the secƟon shall be deemed affirmed. The decision of the council shall be final and not subject to appeal.

Failure of the commiƩee members to aƩend the meeƟngs may result in removal from the CommiƩee at the discreƟon of the council. CommiƩee decisions and acƟons require a simple majority vote of those members in aƩendance. The quorum requirement for any meeƟng shall be a minimum of four members.

Staff Liaison Appointment:

Page 40 of 745 ends

5 The Assistant Director of Public Works and/or his their designee will serve as staff liaisonliaison (s) to the CommiƩee. The liaison (s) will be responsible for providing relevant informaƟon, support, and advice to the CommiƩee. The liaison (s) will prepare, post, and distribute agendas and take minutes at each meeƟng. The liaison(s) will provide the minutes of the CommiƩee’s proceeds to the council and the public.

Page 41 of 745 ends

1 (PROPOSED EXHIBIT “A” WITH NO MARKUP)

LANDSCAPE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE GUIDELINES AND DUTIES

The City Council of the City of Fairfield hereby establishes a Landscape Oversight CommiƩee (CommiƩee) to provide fiscal oversight and review of the Public Works Department’s management of landscaping throughout the city. The CommiƩee’s primary focus will be to improve the effecƟveness, transparency, and financial management of the City’s landscape maintenance.

ApplicaƟon/ Recruitment Process:

The standard recruitment process that is used for all other exisƟng City boards, commissions and commiƩees will be uƟlized to conduct the recruitment of applicaƟons for the CommiƩee.

NoƟce of these vacancies will be adverƟsed in the Fairfield Daily Republic newspaper, posted on the City’s website, and posted on the Civic Center noƟce boards.

Powers and DuƟes:

The CommiƩee will provide independent oversight of the operaƟonal and financial aspects of all Landscaping and LighƟng Maintenance Districts (LLMDs) and non-LLMD landscape areas paid for by the General Fund (herein “non-LLMD areas”). DuƟes shall consist of reviewing the annual budget and any other City financial reports necessary to advise the council. The CommiƩee will report directly to the council.

Key responsibiliƟes include reviewing managerial processes, ensuring transparency and effecƟveness, and examining the use of LLMD revenues and General Fund revenues specifically allocated for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas. Landscape maintenance that is funded by Enterprise funds and other funding sources are excluded from the CommiƩee’s purview.

The CommiƩee, together with staff, will educate District residents as to the operaƟon and funcƟon of LLMDs and the associated costs to maintain and improve such districts. The CommiƩee serves in an advisory-only role to the council limited to:

1. The review of operaƟonal and financial aspects of LLMD and non-LLMD landscaped areas throughout the city.

2. The review of the use of LLMD revenues (such as assessments, interest earned, general fund contribuƟons and/or loans) and General Fund revenues specifically budgeted for landscape maintenance in non-LLMD areas.

3. EducaƟng residents about the operaƟon and funcƟon of LLMDs.

Page 42 of 745 ends

2 The duƟes of the CommiƩee do not include decision-making responsibiliƟes regarding:
 spending prioriƟes;
 funding source decisions;
 financing plans;
 operaƟonal or managerial processes;
 contractor selecƟon or management; or
 any other decision-making responsibiliƟes that pertain to processes, procedures, or policies regarding the City’s landscaping.

QualificaƟons for Appointment:

The CommiƩee will consist of seven members.
 Six CommiƩee Members shall be comprised of one person with residency within the respecƟve council district area.
 One CommiƩee Member will be at-large.
 Residency may be verified annually by the City Clerk's Office through (1) voter registraƟon or (2) uƟlity bills (phone, water, cable).

SelecƟon of Members:

Candidates shall complete and submit applicaƟons to the City per instrucƟons on the vacancy adverƟsement. The mayor and city council will appoint their respecƟve CommiƩee Members.

All CommiƩee Members shall aƩend orientaƟon and training, including the Brown Act and AB1234 Ethics Training, prior to their first regular CommiƩee meeƟng.

Terms of Service:

Each CommiƩee Member term shall be for a period of five years.

ElecƟon of CommiƩee Chair and Vice Chair:

The CommiƩee shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair at the first meeƟng of the calendar year with a simple majority vote of the CommiƩee Members in aƩendance. The Chair and Vice Chair shall serve a one-year term; however, incumbents may be elected to serve addiƟonal consecuƟve or non-consecuƟve terms.

MeeƟngs:

Schedule and DuraƟon: The CommiƩee shall adopt an annual regular meeƟng schedule no later than the last meeƟng of the preceding calendar year. Regular meeƟngs shall be held on a quarterly basis for approximately two hours each meeƟng. AddiƟonal special meeƟngs may be scheduled as necessary.

Page 43 of 745 ends

3 Quorum: The quorum requirement for any meeƟng shall be a minimum of four members. If the quorum requirement is not met by 10 minutes aŌer the scheduled start Ɵme (15 minutes with noƟficaƟon to the staff liaison) the meeƟng shall be cancelled.

Guidelines: The CommiƩee is subject to the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. MeeƟngs shall be noƟced and open to the public. CommiƩee meeƟng minutes and reports are a maƩer of public record. DraŌ meeƟng minutes shall be posted on the City’s website no later than 21 calendar days aŌer conclusion of the meeƟng.

VoƟng: CommiƩee decisions and acƟons require a simple majority vote of those CommiƩee Members in aƩendance.

AƩendance: A CommiƩee Member may have a maximum of two unexcused absences in any twelve-month period. Absences exempt from this SecƟon include:

1. Absences due to medical or family emergencies.

2. Absences due to unforeseen and urgent circumstances.

3. Absences approved in advance by the chairperson or staff liaison.

In the case of a medical or family emergency, or due to unforeseen and urgent circumstances, a CommiƩee Member shall noƟfy the chairperson or staff liaison in wriƟng within 30 days of their absence to request an exempƟon.

If a CommiƩee Member incurs a third non-exempt absence during any twelve-month period, the CommiƩee Member will be deemed to have resigned their posiƟon and shall no longer be a member of the commiƩee.

The staff liaison shall issue a leƩer to the CommiƩee Member, with a copy to the Mayor, noƟfying them that they have exceeded the number of absences allowed under this policy, and have therefore resigned their posiƟon. The leƩer shall be personally served to the CommiƩee Member or sent via first-class United States Postal Service (USPS) mail, return receipt requested.

Having received the noƟce, the CommiƩee Member shall have 10 business days to request an appeal of this secƟon before the City Council. The CommiƩee Member shall submit their request for appeal in wriƟng (either via e-mail, hand delivery, or USPS mail) to the city clerk. The city clerk shall set the appeal hearing at a regular or special meeƟng of the city council within 45 business days from receiving the request for a hearing from the CommiƩee Member.

If the CommiƩee Member fails to submit the request for a right of appeal within 10 business days, the posiƟon shall be deemed vacant.

Page 44 of 745 ends

4 At an appeal hearing brought by a CommiƩee Member under this secƟon, the council shall allow the CommiƩee Member to address the council to explain their absences and provide any documents or other evidence to support their appeal. The council may consider any evidence it deems necessary to make its decision. Following the hearing, by a majority vote the council may affirm the removal of the CommiƩee Member or vote to reinstate the CommiƩee Member to their posiƟon on the commiƩee. In the case of a Ɵe vote by the council, the removal of the CommiƩee Member under the secƟon shall be deemed affirmed. The decision of the council shall be final and not subject to appeal.

Staff Liaison Appointment:

The Director of Public Works and/or their designee will serve as staff liaison to the CommiƩee.

The liaison will be responsible for providing relevant informaƟon, support, and advice to the CommiƩee. The liaison will prepare, post, and distribute agendas and take minutes at each meeƟng.

Page 45 of 745 ends

Agenda Item No: J.4

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025 -79 PW Professional Services Agreement for Daily and Special Inspections

Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Fairfield and Kennedy Jenks Consultants for the Water Treatment Plant Solar Array and High Lift Pump and Power Upgrades
Funding Source: $303,786; Water Capital Projects Fund

Contact: Michael Hether, (707) 428-7493

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The Waterman Water Treatment Plant (Waterman WTP) is one of two water treatment facilities serving the City of Fairfield. The proposed professional services agreement will provide daily and special inspection services for the Waterman WTP Solar Arrays and High Lift Pump and Power Project (CPW090041).

DISCUSSION
On November 19, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-265 approving a contract with C. Overaa & Co. to upgrade the high lift pump station pump and electrical system. The Project involves enhancements to City infrastructure that are essential for the ongoing operation of the Waterman WTP and includes mechanical, el ectrical, and structural improvements, such as replacing the existing five turbine pumps, incorporating a backup generator to ensure continuous plant operations, and installing a new pre -purchased electrical main switchboard with solar breaker for future solar interconnection. The Project will integrate the current solar field design, with construction planned for late summer 2025. Special inspections of the electrical and structural components are required to ensure compliance with building and electrical permit requirements.

Page 46 of 745 ends

Kennedy Jenks Consultants, Inc. (Kennedy Jenks) is a well-established water and engineering firm whose core competencies are water system planning, design, engineering, and construction support services. Kennedy Jenks will be performing special construction inspections on electrical and some structural items required to satisfy permits, as City staff is not qualified for the special electrical inspections. Kennedy Jenks has significant knowledge of the Ci ty’s water system, understanding of the applicable building codes and regulations, and experience on similar projects.

Pursuant to Chapter 28.31 of the Fairfield Municipal Code, professional services shall be let on the basis of the competence demonstrated and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required.

Due to Kennedy Jenks’ expertise and knowledge of the City’s system, staff recommend entering into an agreement with Kennedy Jenks to provide daily and special construction inspection services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The professional service agreement with Kennedy Jenks will authorize a contract for an amount not to exceed the total authorization for this agreement is not to exceed $ 303,786, which is the total proposed fee plus a 10% management reserve ($27 6,169 total base fee + $27, 616.90 management reserve). The cost for this agreement will be paid out of the Water Enterprise Fund (Fund 462, Project No. CPW090041). Kennedy Jenks’proposed scope and cost for this work is in line with work on similarly sized projects.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may delay approval of the professional services agreement so that staff can address any council concerns.

COORDINATED WITH
N/A

STAFF CONTACT
Bryan Heinzelman, Associate Civil Engineer
(707) 434-6157
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3: Proposed Agreement

Page 47 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-79

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD AND KENNEDY JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR THE SOLAR ARRAY AND

WATERMAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT HIGH LIFT PUMP AND POWER UPGRADES

WHEREAS, the Waterman Water Treatment Plant (Waterman WTP) is considered critical infrastructure and is essential to providing clean water to city businesses and residents; and

WHEREAS, the Waterman WTP Solar Arrays and High Lift Pump and Power Upgrades Project (CPW090041) is providing upgrades to City infrastructure that are critical to the continued operation of the Waterman WTP; and

WHEREAS, Kennedy Jenks Consultants, Inc. (Kennedy Jenks) is a well-established water and engineering firm whose core competencies are water system engineering and construction support services that include daily and special inspections; and

WHEREAS, special inspections on the electrical and structural features will be required to satisfy the building and electrical permit requirements, as City staff is not qualified for the electrical special inspections; and

WHEREAS, Kennedy Jenks has extensive and special knowledge of the applicable building codes and regulations to fulfill all building code requirements; and

WHEREAS, staff seek to enter into an agreement with Kenndy Jenks Consultants to perform daily and special inspections.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The city manager is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Fairfield a professional services agreement between the City of Fairfield and Kennedy Jenks Consultants for a contract amount not to exceed $303,786, which is the total proposed fee plus a 10% management reserve ($276,169 total base fee + $27,616.90 management reserve).

Section 2. The city manager or designee is hereby authorized to do all things necessary to implement the above-mentioned contract.

Page 48 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-79

Page 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Page 49 of 745 ends

1 Revised 1/09/2025

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made at Fairfield, California, as of ________________, 20____, by and between the City of Fairfield, a municipal corporation (the “CITY") and Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"), who agree as follows:
1) SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to the CITY the services described in Exhibit “A,” which consists of the proposal submitted by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit “A.”
2) PAYMENT. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit “B.” The payments specified in Exhibit “B” shall be the only payments to be made to CONSULTANT for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall submit all billings for said services to the CITY in the manner specified in Exhibit “B.” 3) FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. 4) GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit “C” are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the provisions set forth in Exhibit “C” shall control. 5) INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. The insurance requirements set forth in Exhibit “D” are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the requirements set forth in Exhibit “D” shall control. 6) BUSINESS LICENSE. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep current a business license for work within the City of Fairfield pursuant to Chapter 10B of the Fairfield City Code, with respect to the gross receipts received pursuant to this Agreement. No payments shall be made to any SERVICE PROVIDER until such business license has been obtained, and all fees paid therefore, by the CONSULTANT. Business license applications and information may be obtained from the Community Development Department, Fairfield City Hall, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533-4883, (707-428- 7509) and online at
www.fairfield.ca.gov/biz.
7 ) EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein.
8) TERM. This agreement shall be in effect through April, 2026. 9) GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. Should either Party to this Agreement bring legal action against the other, the validity, interpretation, and performance of this Contract shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of California, excluding California’s choice of law rules. Venue for any such action relating to this Agreement shall be in the Solano County Superior Court. 10) Where applicable, vehicles
with a GVWR greater than 8,500 lbs. and light-duty package delivery vehicles operated in California may be subject to the California Air Resources Board Advanced Clean Fleets regulations. Such vehicles may therefore be subject to requirements to reduce emissions of

Page 50 of 745 ends

2 Revised 1/09/2025
air pollutants. For more information, please visit the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean-fleets

11) ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT.

This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor any provision or breach waived, except in a writing signed by both parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. 12) COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart originals, duplicate originals, or both, each of which is deemed to be an original for all purposes. 13) NOTICES. This Agreement is managed and administered on the CITY’s behalf by the individual named below. All invoices must be submitted and approved by this individual and all notices shall be given to the CITY using the following contact information:

CITY Contact: Bryan Heinzelman
E-mail: [email protected]
Address: 2900 Vista Grande, Fairfield, CA 94534
Telephone: (707) 434-6157
Notices must be given to CONSULTANT at the following:

CONSULTANT Contact: Tom Gorman
E-mail: [email protected]
Address: 703 2
nd Street, Suite 411, Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Telephone: (707) 293-1179

EXECUTED as of the day first above-stated.

City of Fairfield, a municipal corporation

By:__________________________________

CONSULTANT

By:___________________________________

Page 51 of 745 ends

703 Second Street, Suite 411, Santa Rosa, CA 95401
(707) 52
6-1064 | Tom [email protected]
March 20, 2025
Bryan Heinzelman PE
Associate Civil Engineer
Public Works Department
City of Fairfield
1000 Webster Street, 3rd Floor
Fairfield, CA 94533
S
ubject: Proposal for Construction Inspection Services for the City of Fairfield Waterman Water Treatment Plant High Lift Pump and Power Upgrades Project, City Project Number 119- 4414
Dear Mr. Heinzelman:

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (KJ) is pleased to submit our proposal to provide responsive, cost- effective Construction Inspection Services for the City of Fairfield (City) Waterman Water Treatment Plant High Lift Pump and Power Upgrades Project, City Project Number 119-4414.

Key Personnel
KJ Project Manager – Tom Gorman has over 30 years of project and construction management experience and will provide project management assistance and coordination of KJ’s services to the City’s Project Manager for inspection services provided under this work order. A copy of Tom’s resume is presented in Appendix A.

Site Inspector – Jorge Luna who has over 30 years of inspection experience and extensive knowledge of water treatment plant infrastructure projects and will provide quality assurance observation oversight.

A copy of Jorge’s resume is presented in Appendix A.

Startup & Commissioning Engineer – Laura Thomas has over 36 years of start-up and commissioning experience water treatment plant infrastructure projects and will lead project startup and commissioning effort. A copy of Laura’s resume is presented in Appendix A.

Material Testing & Specialty Inspection – RGH Consultants, based in Santa Rosa, has provided geotechnical, material testing, and specialty inspection to clients in Northern California for over 25 years.

Task 1 Project Management
KJ will manage and submit monthly invoices in an efficient and timely manner and in accordance with the agreement. KJ will coordinate with subconsultants work activities. KJ will provide project management assistance and coordination of KJ’s services to the City’s Project Manager for inspection services provided under this work order.

EXHIBIT A

Page 52 of 745 ends

Bryan Heinzelman PE
Associate Civil Engineer
March 20, 2025

Page 2 ends

703 Second Street, Suite 411, Santa Rosa, CA 95401
(707) 888-8064 | [email protected]
Task 2 Construction Observation
KJ will provide both on-site inspection services to verify that the contractor’s work is performed in compliance with the contract documents and construction permits. KJ inspector is not authorized to make changes and shall notify the City’s Construction Manager if any deviation from the Contract Documents. KJ inspection services will include the following. • Complete Daily Construction Reports and submit signed Reports to the City’s Construction Manager for review.
• Take digital construction progress photos, label, and store in a logical manner to be turned over to the City’s Construction Manager for review.
• Document all warnings given to the Contractor regarding safety hazards. • Keep an up to date set of marked up drawings recording as-built conditions or, if required by Contract, ensure that the Contractor is doing so.
• If required, review Contractor’s monthly payment requests, establish payment quantities, review materials on hand, prepare, sign, and date payment recommendations and submit to the Engineer for payment.
• If required, create a Punch List of outstanding items to be completed when the project is at substantial completion.
• Make “Record Plan” redline revisions to the original project drawings to show changes that occurred during construction that was observed.

Task 3 Material Testing/Specialty Inspection
KJ will provide material testing and specialty inspection services, including sidewalk subgrade review and compaction testing, concrete review and compression testing, CMU wall steel and grout inspection and testing, transformer pad reinforced steel testing, electrical and water trenches compaction testing as needed to verify materials are furnished and installed in accordance with the contract documents. KJ will maintain reports and results of inspection and material testing services to compliance with the contract documents.

Task 4 Startup and Commissioning
KJ will coordinate with the City, the Contractor, and the Design Engineer to successfully start-up and commission the project. KJ will verify that all startup, testing and commissioning activities have been properly performed, accepted and thoroughly documented before the Notice of Substantial Completion is issued.

Assumptions:
• All inspections will be within the project limits.

Page 53 of 745 ends

Br
yan Heinzelman PE
Associate Civil Engineer
March 20, 2025

Page 3 ends

703 Second Street, Suite 411, Santa Rosa, CA 95401
(707) 888-8064 | [email protected]
• Contractor will be solely responsible for site safety at the project site and shall provide its own safety program and safety officer to oversee the program. Contractor’s safety program shall be adhered to be all contractor personnel, all contractor subcontractor personnel, all contractor suppliers’, manufacturers’, fabricators and delivery personnel visiting and/or performing Work on the project site.
• On-site inspection effort is based on Contractor’s approved baseline schedule. The approved baseline schedule indicated the Contractor will be onsite for 136 workdays from March 2025 to April 2026.
• Cost proposal is based on inspection level of effort of 20-hour work week. • Proposal does not include any additional inspector hourly overtime. • Document control and document control software is not included in KJ scope of services. • Contractor certified payroll verification effort is not included in the cost proposal. • Site environmental monitoring is not included in the cost proposal.

Fee Estimate
KJ proposes to perform the services described above on a time and materials basis in the not to exceed amount of $276,169 in accordance with the enclosed fee proposal presented in Appendix B.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Ve
ry truly yours,
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.

Ron Esmilla, PE Tom Gorman
Principal In Charge Senior Construction Manager
En
closed: Appendix A Resumes
Appendix B Cost Proposal

Page 54 of 745 ends

Appendix A
Resumes

Page 55 of 745 ends

Thomas R. Gorman
Construction Manager

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Tom Gorman has over 36 years of project and construction management experience, with specialized expertise in all aspects of serving recycled water to urban, agricultural, commercial, and industrial customers. Tom has implemented over 600 urban customer connections in the past 12 years and, in doing so, has developed and refined specific approaches to helping customers feel comfortable in using recycled water and obtaining regulatory approval from both the California Recycled Water Quality Control Board and Department of Public Health.

Tom has also developed strategies for cost-effective bidding and construction of customer connections/retrofits using various bid packages that are carefully sequenced with the construction of the recycled water distribution pipelines. Tom is familiar with the Town’s preferences, priorities, and inner workings, having served as the Construction Manager for the following Town of Windsor projects:
• Pavement Rehabilitation (2015)
• Jaguar Way/Windsor Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (2016–2017) • Bell Road/Market Street-Windsor River Road Pedestrian Improvement Project (2017) • Conde Lane/Johnson Street-Pedestrian Enhancement Project (2017) • On-Call Engineering Services (2019)

TOTAL YEARS OF

EXPERIENCE
36 EDUCATION
Project Control and
Business
Management,
University of
California, Santa Cruz
Landscape Design,
Inchbald School of
Design, London,
United Kingdom
Mechanical and Electrical
Engineering
Apprenticeships,
United Kingdom

CERTIFICATIONS
Construction Safety
Confined Space Entry

MEMBERSHIPS /

AFFILIATIONS
Construction Management
Association of
America (CMAA)

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Laguna Treatment Plant, On-Call Contract Construction Management Services, City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa, CA | Construction Manager
Construction Manager for various as-needed construction management activities associated with the On-Call Construction Contract. Responsible for managing the replacement of the Aeration Basin Low-Pressure Air Distribution Main, refurbishment of Clarifier #3, coordinating inspection access for Digester # 4 and Digester #3, replacement of the Biosolids Facility Fire Suppression System Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS); retrofit work on the EB Pump Station Distribution Header. Specific duties include ensuring that contractors comply with program and project specifications; reviewing contract drawings; reviewing contract documents, construction drawings, schedules, submittals, requests for information, shop drawings, change orders, contractor invoices; and coordinating activities between the project team, the City of Santa Rosa, designers, and contractors. Chair project status meetings, project coordination meetings, pre-construction and construction meetings, and start-up and commissioning meetings. ($750,000).

Laguna Treatment Plant Combined Heat/Power Project Construction Management Services, City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa, CA | Construction Manager Construction Manager for as-needed construction management activities. Managed replacement of the Aeration Basin Low-Pressure Air Distribution Main, refurbishment of Clarifier #3, coordinating inspection access for Digester # 4 and Digester #3, replacement of the Biosolids Facility Fire Suppression System Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS); retrofit work on the EB Pump Station Distribution Header, Meadow Lane Pump Station Header Isolation Valve and PRV installations, Cogeneration Building Motor Control Center (MCC) electrical modifications, Primary Sedimentation Basin and Building concrete modifications, Belt Press Building safety ladder improvements, Delta Pond Levee control valves Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) installation Aeration Tank #1 joint sealant, isolation gates and concrete repairs,

Page 56 of 745 ends

Thomas R. Gorman
Project Management
Institute (PMI)
Geysers Pump Station 'E' isolation valve installation, walkway and grating modifications to the Aeration Tanks common trench.

Laguna Treatment Plant, Sludge Pump Replacement, City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa, CA | Construction Manager
Phased demolition and replacement of the City's Sludge Pump System. The project included the installation of six new sludge pumps, associated switchgear, and controls. Specific duties include ensuring that contractors comply with program and project specifications; reviewing contract drawings; reviewing contract documents, construction drawings, schedules, submittals, requests for information, shop drawings, change orders, contractor invoices; and coordinating activities between the project team, the City of Santa Rosa, designers, and contractors. Chair project status meetings, project coordination meetings, pre-construction and construction meetings, and start-up and commissioning meetings. ($1 million).

Laguna Treatment Plant Combined Heat/Power Project Construction Management Services, City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa, CA | Construction Manager Construction of the City's new 4.4MW Cogeneration Facility. The project includes the installation of four new Lean-Burn Engines, gas conditioning systems, boiler room modifications, switchgear, and transformer installation, start-up and commissioning, and demolition of the existing facilities. Specific duties include ensuring that contractors comply with program and project specifications; reviewing contract drawings; reviewing contract documents, construction drawings, schedules, submittals, requests for information, shop drawings, change orders, contractor invoices; and coordinating activities between the project team, the City of Santa Rosa, designers, and contractors. Chaired project status meetings, project coordination meetings, pre-construction and construction meetings, and start-up and commissioning meetings.

Construction Management and Inspection Services - Secondary Treatment Plant Upgrade and Recycled Water Expansion, Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District, San Rafael, CA | Construction Manager
Serving as the construction manager on a $56M secondary treatment plant upgrade and recycled water expansion project for LGVSD. Key components of the project include the construction of a new electrical building and associated duct banks; construction of a new primary pump station, anoxic and aeration basins, RAS collection structure, two new clarifiers, mechanical thickeners, and a new dichlorination system; expansion of the recycled water facility including new filter feed pumps, membrane skids, and distribution pumps; yard piping, grading, and paving. Maintaining existing plant operations has been a continuous challenge with many complex tie-ins and bypasses. Significant pre-planning and coordination have been required to transition smoothly to the new process. Value engineering has been incorporated to resequence construction of the new clarifiers, saving time on completion of the project and providing the District with an improved process layout and some much-needed Equalization storage.

Page 57 of 745 ends

Jorge E. Luna
Construction Inspector

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Jorge brings over 55 years of experience in electrical inspection, particularly in water and wastewater facilities and medium-voltage systems and equipment startup. Skilled in coordinating with engineers and overseeing electrical system testing and installation. Extensive knowledge of codes, special standards, methods, materials, and equipment is critical for conducting inspections to verify code and safety compliance. Regular inspector as part of KJ’s as-needed CMS agreement with the City of San Jose for plant improvement and rehabilitation projects.

TOTAL YEARS OF

EXPERIENCE
58 EDUCATION
BA, Electrical Inspection,
Sacramento State
University, 1967
BA, General Studies,
Sacramento State
University, 1967

CERTIFICATIONS
Construction Safety
Confined Space Entry
30-Hour Construction
Safety and Health,
OSHA

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Fire Life Safety Upgrades and Storm Drain System Improvements Electrical Inspection Services (9438-4-SO5), City of San Jose, Water Pollution Control, San Jose, CA | Electrical Construction Inspector
Electrical/Instrumentation and Control Inspector for the $107M San Jose/Santa Clara RWF Anaerobic Digesters Rehabilitation Project. This work is part of KJ's as-needed CMS agreement with the City of San Jose involving multiple plant improvement and rehabilitation projects. Fire Life Safety Upgrades (FLSU): Project required new fire alarm monitoring system to operate as a single integrated addressable fire alarm system. Included new panels; dedicated circuits for compliance to NFPA72; new UPS systems; and dial out to the central station to call the San Jose Fire Department to dispatch engines in an emergency. This project required considerable coordination with building occupants, Control Room operators, and the San Jose Fire Department. Storm Drain Systems Upgrade: Project required the inspection of seven stormwater pump stations in and around the plant. Several stations required reconductoring, all required new lighting, and three required new pumps. Timeline required pumps to be in service before the rainy season or provide temporary power pumps to transfer water to empty ponds.

Outfall Channel and Instrumentation Improvements - Sulfur Dioxide Building, City of San Jose, Water Pollution Control, San Jose, CA | Electrical Construction Inspector Electrical/Instrumentation and Control Inspector for the $107M San Jose/Santa Clara RWF Anaerobic Digesters Rehabilitation Project. This work is part of KJ's as-needed CMS agreement with the City of San Jose involving multiple plant improvement and rehabilitation projects. The outfall project included 1.3 miles of 3x4-inch and 2x2-inch conduit from the RWWF to the outfall at the Bay. The new project provided one 4160-volt feeder and the replacement of a telemetry system with a new fiber and new instrumentation to monitor outfall quality.

Digester and Thickener Facilities Upgrade Project Inspection Services, City of San Jose, Water Pollution Control, San Jose, CA | Construction Inspector Electrical/Instrumentation and Control Inspector for the $107M San Jose/Santa Clara RWF Anaerobic Digesters Rehabilitation Project. This work is part of KJ's as-needed CMS agreement with the City of San Jose involving multiple plant improvement and rehabilitation projects.

Project involved converting three new dissolved air flotation treatment systems (DAFTS) and covering them in conjunction with a new odor control system. Also, deactivated nine other DAFTS, a new 2-story Sludge Screening Building with a new bin system for sludge removal, a

Page 58 of 745 ends

Jorge E. Luna
new Polymer injection plant for co-thickening, and an aboveground bridge systems to transport Digester Gas and electrical; lighting and instrumentation; a new flare to assist in flaring; two new 4160-volt feeders to support the DTFU project with one central Substation and one 4160 to 480- volt transformer and three distribution Motor Control Center (MCC) buildings. Installed five new Distributed Control Stations with tie-ins to a new fiber system using the existing backbone and an 8+ hour UPS for all locations. Completed all start up and closeout for this project.

US Navy Communications | Senior Electrical Specialist
Prior electrical experience: US Navy Communication Electrician, journeyman electrician, lineman, Line truck operator, substation electrician.

Senior Electrical Specialist | Senior Electrical Specialist As a general rule and part of General conditions, the General Contractor and his subs are required to request schedule inspections. Modifications are made daily on a assisting the Project to stay on schedule. Inspection request must identify area of inspection by Contract drawing and Extra work tags with Contract FO, FD or CL.

Senior Electrical Specialist | Senior Electrical Specialist Daily inspection reports and daily diary of a quality that they can be used in litigation.

Easterly Wastewater Treatment Plant Tertiary Filtration Improvements Project | Construction Inspector
Provided inspection, startup and commissioning of the electrical and mechanical systems for this $55-million expansion. Work included replacing the 12kV and 480 volt systems including MCCs to new and existing electrical rooms. Work included extensive installation of new concrete reinforced duct banks in the existing plant. Primary and secondary cable were pulled and tested daily. Other work included the addition of a new secondary clarifier, a scum pump system, two new RAS pumps and new AFDs for the existing 4 RAS pumps. The existing headworks work included installation of two 200HP, 480 volt raw sewage influent pumps. The filtration complex installation included over 60 automated valves and five new 100 HP filtration influent AFD pumps for the six dual media filters. The filter backwash system included two scouring air blowers to provide air scour during the backwash process. The filter complex included back wash basins and backwash pumps for the filters. New chlorine contact basins and process control and final effluent monitoring buildings and systems were installed and commissioned. Jorge oversaw and documented all of the instrument installation, calibration, and testing and commissioning processes.
responsibilities include factory acceptance testing of electrical and SCADA equipment, facility demolition, SCADA coordination, and various testing (point-to-point and loop).

Page 59 of 745 ends

Laura Thomas, PE, CCP
Startup & Commissioning

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Laura Thomas is a BCA Certified Commissioning Professional (CCP) and a licensed electrical engineer with over 35 years of industry experience with specific expertise in startup and commissioning of large complex projects for the last 18 years. She has experience in startup and commissioning for several processes, including aerobic and anaerobic digestion facilities, pumping systems, lift stations, chemical injection facilities, energy reuse including microturbines and heat optimization, and truck unloading facilities. She is also experienced in commissioning building systems, including HVAC, lighting, and fire protection for these industrial facilities.

TOTAL YEARS OF

EXPERIENCE
36 EDUCATION
BS, Electrical/Electronic
Engineering,
California State
University,
Sacramento, 1987
MS, Electrical
Engineering,
University of Southern
California, 1990

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer -
Electrical - California
(13700)
Professional Engineer -
Electrical - Arizona
(31544)

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Commissioning
Professional, Building
Commissioning
Association

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
HDCC NAVFAC SIOP Pearl Harbor Dry Dock Commissioning, Hawaiian Dredging Construction Comp, Honolulu, HI | Lead Commissioning Engineer Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) Pacific is building a replacement dry dock at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY&IMF) in Oahu, Hawaii, as part of the Navy’s Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program (SIOP). Laura is leading the commissioning services for the startup and NAVFAC and NAVSEA acceptance of the building systems associated with improvements. This $4 billion project includes many pump stations, water systems, HVAC units, fans, and associated electrical and instrument systems. Laura is responsible for design review, construction submittal review, commissioning Coordination meetings, construction phase commissioning plans, pre- functional checks (PFCs), functional performance tests (FPTs) and integrated systems tests (ISTs), a training plan, commissioning report, and warranty phase site visits.

West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant (WLTRWTP) Engineering Services during Construction, Tahoe City Public Utility District, Tahoe City, CA | Startup and Commissioning Manager
Supports construction submittal review and supports the project's electrical and control system infrastructure, including start-up, operational testing, and commissioning of all treatment- processes. The project constructs the new 1.0 mgd West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant, which includes submersible lake intake pumps; 1,500 LF of 12-inch raw water line; 300 LF of-36-inch raw water line; raw water lake intake pump station building; water treatment plant-building; installation of owner-procured microfiltration and ultra-violet light disinfection systems; construction and installation of chemical feed systems, treated water pump station, above ground treated water clearwell tank, generators, motor control centers, PLC-based control system with a Wonderware SCADA System, associated piping, instrumentation, and electrical-work; 1,200 LF of 8- and 12-inch treated water line; site improvements including, but not limited to, site-grading, paving, drainage; demolition of existing water treatment facilities; and associated work.

Page 60 of 745 ends

Laura Thomas, PE, CCP
Michelson Water Recycling Plant Biosolids and Energy Recovery Facilities (Biosolids)Project, Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine, CA | Startup and Commissioning Manager
Performed construction and commissioning management activities including submittal review, development workshop coordination, and witnessed bench testing, witnessed startup testing and commissioning. The Biosolids Project was to extract solids from 33MGD of wastewater and reuse as fertilizer. The project included pipeline expansion, a new solids handling building, thickening and dewatering facilities including centrifuges and polymer injection, dryer facilities, a sequencing batch reactor for centrate treatment, truck loading bay facility, food waste receiving station, acid phase digesters, methane phase digesters, sludge screening facility, chemical storage and feed systems. For energy reuse microturbines were installed for power production and gas from the digesters was reused for heating both the digestion and drying systems. The project also included yard piping, storm water collection and pumping facilities, electrical systems including 12kV to 480-volt substation, and motor control centers. Building systems included air handling, lighting, fire protection and security systems. Laura developed the commissioning test plans to test process systems in five phases including sludge pumping, thickening systems, dewatering systems, digestion, and sludge drying. Laura also developed the Process Control System Operating and Maintenance manuals and executed the training program for operations staff. She developed Standard Operational and Reliability Test Procedures (SOPs) to aide operation staff in safe de energization of the facility.

Michelson Water Recycling Plant Phase II Expansion (Phase II) Project, Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine, CA | Startup and Commissioning Manager Performed startup and commissioning activities which including submittal review, mechanical equipment acceptance testing, electrical equipment acceptance testing, witnessed bench testing of Process Control System PLCs and HMI software as well as commissioning and performance testing for overall processes. The Phase II Project included the installation of a new membrane bio-reactor (MBR) facility and replacement of multiple existing facilities including a new headworks (screening) facility, primary effluent pump station, high rate clarifier, ultraviolet disinfection, chemical injection facilities, and odor control systems. Existing PLCs where upgraded and new SCADA graphics developed. Performed witnessed field testing including Operational Readiness Testing and Functional Acceptance Testing of sub-systems. Developed and witnessed the commissioning of all subsystems and the overall plant performance tests.

Coordinated bringing new subsystems within an existing plant infrastructure while maintaining operability of the existing plant.

Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS) Project, Orange County Water District, Orange, CA | Construction Manager/Electrical Startup/Commissioning Manager GWRS is the world's largest water purification system for indirect potable reuse of water. GWRS was a greenfield project that included microfiltration, ultraviolet disinfection, and chemical injection, as well as a series of well sites for reinjection to the groundwater barrier. The project included several buildings, process equipment, pumping and piping systems as well as a 66kV to 12kV electrical substation, 12kV to 4160V distribution system, 4160V to 480 volt power centers and smart 480V MCCs. A new distributed control system (DCS) was installed with an Information Management System (IMS) to optimize maintenance and use predictive maintenance tools such as vibration and heat monitoring for large pumps.. Managed the commissioning of all electrical, telecommunications and control systems.

Page 61 of 745 ends

4 Revised 1/09/2025
EXHIBIT “B”

PAYMENT

1) The total contract price for services rendered by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not exceed $276,169.

2) Payment shall be made to CONSULTANT in accordance w ith the CONSULTANT’S price proposal as accepted by the City, and CONSULTANT sh all submit monthly invoices to the CITY for the same.
3) Any additional meetings or work required beyond tha t set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be mutually agreed to in writing by the CITY and CONSU LTANT, and shall be billed on a time and materials basis to the City of Fairfield.

Page 62 of 745 ends

Proposal Fee Estimate
CLIENT Name:

PROJECT Description: Appendix B - Waterman Highlift Pumps and Power Upgrades Project Inspection Services Proposal/Job Number: B028680*34572
City of Fairfield
January 1, 2025 Rates KJ KJ Sub KJ KJ KJ

Classification:

Project Manager (Tom
Gorman)
Inspector (Jorge Luna)
Startup & Commissioning
(Laura Thomas)
Project Assist (Araceli
Aguilar)Total
Labor
Escalation
Materails Testing and
Specilaty Inspection (RGH)
Sub-Markup
ODCs
ODCs
Markup Total Labor + Subs + ODCs
Total
Labor
Total
Subs
Total
ODCs
Hourly Rate: $265 $214 $270 $130 Hours Fees 3% Fees 5% Fees 5% Fees Task 1 - Project Management 112 56 168 $36,960 $572 $0 $1,000 $50 $37,532 $0 $1,050 $38,582 Task 2 - Construction Observation 72 492 564 $124,368 $1,900 $0 $13,500 $675 $126,268 $0 $14,175 $140,443 Task 3 - Material Testing / Specilaty Inspection 24 24 $6,360 $0 $19,679 $984 $0 $6,360 $20,663 $0 $27,023 Task 4 - Startup & Commissioning 16 24 192 232 $61,216 $1,555 $0 $7,000 $350 $62,771 $0 $7,350 $70,121 All Tasks Total 224 516 192 56 988 $228,904 $4,027 $19,679 $984 $21,500 $1,075 $232,931 $20,663 $22,575 $276,169 https://kjcnet-my.sharepoint.com/personal/tomgorman_kennedyjenks_com/Documents/Desktop/DesktopFiles/Fairfield/Waterman_WTP/New/FINAL/FINAL_3.20.25/Fairfield Waterman Highlift Pump CM Cost Proposal_Final_3-20-25.xlsx © 2008 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.Page 63 of 745

Client/Address: City of Fairfield
1000 Webster Street, 3rd Floor
Fairfield, CA 94533

Contract/Proposal Date: Waterman High Lift Pumps and Power Upgrades Project Inspection Services March 2025

Schedule of Charges Date: March, 2025

PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

Classification Hourly Rate
Senior Commissioning Engineer .......................................................................... $270 Senior Construction Manager .............................................................................. $265 Senior Project Inspector* ..................................................................................... $214 Project Assistant .................................................................................................. $130

Direct Expenses
Reimbursement for direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work, will be at cost plus ten percent for items such as:
a. Maps, photographs, 3rd party reproductions, 3rd party printing, equipment rental, and special supplies related to the work.
b. Consultants, soils engineers, surveyors, contractors, and other outside services. c. Rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence. d. Project specific telecommunications and delivery charges. e. Special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work. f. Outside computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work.

Reimbursement for vehicles used in connection with the work will be at the federally approved mileage rates or at a negotiated monthly rate.
*If prevailing wage rates apply, the above billing rates will be adjusted as appropriate.

Overtime for non-exempt employees will be billed at one and a half times the Hourly Rates specified above.

Rates for professional staff for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses will be at rates one and one-half times the Hourly Rates specified above.

Excise and gross receipts taxes, if any, will be added as a direct expense.

The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the agreement for the services provided, effective March 5, 2025 through December 31, 2025. After December 31, 2025, invoices will reflect the Schedule of Charges currently in effect.

Page 64 of 745 ends

5 Revised 1/09/2025
EXHIBIT “C”

GENERAL PROVISIONS
1) INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT. At all times during the t erm of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of CITY. CITY shall have the right to control CONSULTANT only insofar as the results of C ONSULTANT's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, CITY shall not have the right t o control the means by which CONSULTANT accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. 2) LICENSES; PERMITS; ETC. CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for CONSULTANT to practice CONSULTANT's profession. CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, kee p in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, and approvals whi ch are legally required for CONSULTANT to practice his profession.
3) TIME. CONSULTANT shall devote such services pursua nt to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance o f CONSULTANT's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall adhere to the Schedule of Activities as described in their Executive Summary.
4) CONSULTANT NOT AN AGENT. Except as CITY may specify in writing, CONSULTANT shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of CITY in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.

CONSULTANT shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement, to bind CITY to any obligation whatsoever.
5) ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
6) PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that CITY , in its sole discretion, at any time during the te rm of this Agreement, desires the removal of any person o r persons assigned by CONSULTANT to perform services pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT sha ll remove any such person immediately upon receiving notice from CITY of the desire of CITY for the removal of such person or persons. 7) STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement. Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONSULTANT is engaged in the geographical area in which CONSULTANT practices his profession. All products which CONSULTANT delivers to CITY pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a workmanlik e manner, and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in CONSULTANT's profession. CITY shall be the sole judge as to whether the product of the CONSULTANT is satisfactory.
8) CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be canceled at any time by the CITY at its discretion upon written notification to CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT is entitled to receive full payment for all services performed and all costs incurred u p to and including the date of receipt of written n otice

Page 65 of 745 ends

6 Revised 1/09/2025
to cease work on the project. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to no further compensation for work performed after the date of receipt of written noti ce to cease work. All completed and incomplete products up to the date of receipt of written notice to cease work shall become the property of CITY. 9) PRODUCTS OF CONSULTING. All products of the CONSUL TANT provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the CITY.
10) INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS.
a) If AGREEMENT is an agreement for design professional services subject to California Civil Code § 2782.8(a) and CONSULTANT is a design profess ional, as defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c)(2), to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and designated volunteers (collectively “CITY Indemnitees”) from and against any and all cl aims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and costs, to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTA NT. CONSULTANT’s duty to defend shall consist of reimbursement of defense costs incurred by CITY in direct proportion to the CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault. CONSULTANT’s percentage of fau lt shall be determined, as applicable, by a court o f law, jury or arbitrator. In the event any loss, lia bility or damage is incurred by way of settlement o r resolution without a court, jury or arbitrator havi ng made a determination of the CONSULTANT’s percentage of fault, the parties agree to mediation with a third party neutral to determine the CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost reimbursement owed to the CITY.
b) If AGREEMENT is not an agreement for design professional services subject to California Civil Code § 2782.8(a) or CONSULTANT is not a desig n professional as defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c)(2), to the fullest extent allowed by la w, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY Indemnitees from all claims, suit s, or actions of every name, kind and description, brought forth on account of injuries to or death of any person or damage to property arising from or connected with the willful misconduct, negligent ac ts, errors or omissions, ultra-hazardous activities , activities giving rise to strict liability, or defe cts in design by CONSULTANT or any person directly or indirectly employed by or acting as agent for CONSU LTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including the concurrent or successive passive negligence of the CITY Indemnitees.

It is understood that the duty of CONSULTANT to ind emnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code.

Acceptance of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve CONSULTANT from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply whether or not such insurance policies are determined to be applicable to any such damages or claims for damages.

CONSULTANT’S responsibility for such defense and in demnity shall survive termination or completion of this agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. 11) PROHIBITED INTERESTS. No employee of the CITY shal l have any direct financial interest in this agreement. This agreement shall be voidable at the option of the CITY if this provision is violated.

Page 66 of 745 ends

7 Revised 1/09/2025
12) LOCAL EMPLOYMENT POLICY. The CITY desires wherever possible, to hire qualified local residents to work on city projects. Local resident is defined as a person who resides in Solano Count y.

The CITY encourages an active affirmative action program on the part of its contractors, consultants, and developers. When local projects require, subcontra ctors, contractors, consultants and developers will solicit proposals from qualified local firms where possible.

As a way of responding to the provisions of the Dav is-Bacon Act and this program, contractor, consultants, and developers will be asked, to provi de no more frequently than monthly, a report which lists the employee's name, job class, hours worked, salary paid, city of residence, and ethnic origin. 13) CONSULTANT NOT A PUBLIC OFFICIAL. CONSULTANT is not a "public official" for purposes of Government Code §§ 87200 et seq. CONSULTANT conducts research and arrives at his or her conclusions, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of t he control and direction of the CITY or any CITY official, other than normal contract monitoring. I n addition, CONSULTANT possesses no authority with respect to any CITY decision beyond these conclusions, advice, recommendation, or counsel. 14) EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORTING REQUIRE MENTS. When the CITY executes an agreement for or makes payment to CONSULTANT in the amount of $600 (six hundred dollars) or more in any one calendar year, CONSULTANT shall provide the following information to CITY to comply with Employment Development Department (EDD) reporting requirements:
a) Whether CONSULTANT is doing business as a sole prop rietorship, partnership, limited liability partnership, corporation, limited liabili ty corporation, non-profit corporation or other for m of organization.
b) If CONSULTANT is doing business as a sole proprietorship, CONSULTANT shall provide the full name, address and social security number of the sole proprietor. c) If CONSULTANT is doing business as other than a sole proprietorship, CONSULTANT shall provide CONSULTANT’S federal tax identification number.

Page 67 of 745 ends

8 Revised 1/09/2025
EXHIBIT “D”

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, or employees. 1) MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMITS OF INSURANCE
a) Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence Form CG 00 01) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, per sonal injury, products and completed operations, an d property damage. If Commercial General Liability o r other form with a general aggregate limit is used , either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability coverage (Form CA 00 01 with C ode 1 – any auto) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. c) Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employers’ Liability insurance, each in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 2) INDUSTRY SPECIFIC COVERAGES
If checked below, the following insurance is also required.

Professional Liability Insurance / Errors and Omissions Liability in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence.

Pollution Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence Garage Keepers Insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence Fidelity / Crime / Dishonesty Bond in the minimum amount of $____________ MCS-90 Endorsement to Business Automobile insurance for transportation of hazardous materials and pollutants
Builder’s Risk / Course of Construction Insurance in the minimum amount of $__________.

3) INSURANCE PROVISIONS
a) DEDUCTIBLES AND SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS. Any deduc tibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the op tion of the CITY, either the insurer shall reduce o r eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the CONSULTANT shall procure a b ond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. b) The general and automobile liability policies (and if applicable, pollution liability, garage keepers X

X

Page 68 of 745 ends

9 Revised 1/09/2025
liability and builder’s risk policies) are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
i) The CITY, its officers, officials, employees and vo lunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of work or operati ons performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT; products and completed operations of th e CONSULTANT; premises owned, occupied or used by the CONSULTANT; and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the CONSULTANT. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. ii) For any claims related to this project, the CONSULTANT’S insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the CONSULTANT’S insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to th e CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
iv) The CONSULTANT’S insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. v) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the CITY.
vi) The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The minimum limits stated above shall not serve to reduce the C ONSULTANT’S policy limits of coverage.

Therefore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement, or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured, whichever is greater. c) ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURER. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the CITY.

VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE. CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit D. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf; on forms eq uivalent to CG 20 10 11 85, subject to CITY approva l; and submitted electronically via email at [email protected] . All insurance certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. At the request of the CITY, CONSULTANT shall provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, includin g endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. d) SUB-CONTRACTORS. CONSULTANT shall require all subc ontractors to procure and maintain insurance policies subject to the requirements of Exhibit D. Failure of CONSULTANT to verify existence of sub- contractor’s insurance shall not relieve CONSULTANT from any claim arising from sub-contractors work on behalf of CONSULTANT.

Page 69 of 745 ends

Agenda Item No: J.5

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolutions 2025-80 Through 2025-97 PW Granting Preliminary Approval of Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Engineer’s Reports and Assessments

Granting Preliminary Approval of the Fiscal Year 2025 -2026 Engineer’s Reports, Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments, and Providing Notice of a Public Hearing for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No. 5 – Smith Ranch, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob Estates, No. 10 – Southbrook, No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, No. 13 – North Cordelia, No. 14 – Woodlake, No. 15 – Gold Ridge, No. 16 – Creekside at Cordelia, No. 17 – Chadbourne-Beck-Cordelia, No. 18 – Gold Ridge Park, No. 19 – Corporate Commons, No. 2023-1 (Gateway), and No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley)

Funding Source: Various Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Funds

Contact: Chris Lewis, (707) 428-7089

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolutions.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The adoption of these resolutions will grant preliminary approval of the fiscal year (FY) 2025 - 2026 engineer’s reports, declare intention to order the levy and collection of assessments, and set the date and provide notice for a public hearing for 18 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMDs).

DISCUSSION
The City formed these special districts under the State of California Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq., to provide a funding source for maintaining the landscaping and lighting improvements within the various development areas.

Page 70 of 745 ends

The preliminary approval of the engineer’s reports is the first step in the process of levying the annual assessments. Final approval o f the assessments requires a public hearing, which will be scheduled for the July 1, 2025, City Council meeting.

Annual assessment amounts for each district are subject to the provisions of Proposition 218 and must be set at or below (1) the assessment amount or range adopted at the time the district was formed, (2) the assessment amount or range adopted after the district was formed, but prior to the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996, or (3) the assessment amount or range adopted in accordance with Pro position 218 proceedings, including applicable Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments. The following summaries describe the proposed FY 2025 -2026 budgets, annual assessments, and any proposed rate adjustments for each district.

LLMD No. 1 – Gateway:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Gateway area were provided by LLMD No. 1 – Gateway from 1984 through June 30, 2023. However, due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2022-2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-210 authorizing a $165,000 loan from the Intergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The loan was intended to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, in the absence of a majority protest, the council formed LLMD No. 2023 -1 (Gateway) to replace LLMD No. 1 – Gateway, beginning July 1, 2023. The City will continue to collect assessments under LLMD No. 1 – Gateway and utilize the district’s available cash balance to pay the annual loan installments through FY 2027 -2028. The council may consider the dissolution of this district in FY 2028-2029.

The total FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the Gateway district is proposed at $18,200, which is a 30% increase from the total FY 2024 -2025 assessment levy of $14,000. The increase to assessment levies is required to cover City staff administrative costs, which were not previously charged in FY 2024-2025. Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on parcel size and are below the maximum allowable rates established in 1995.

The budget for this district includes the third annual loan payment and applicable administrative costs. The total proposed revenue is $18,796, which includes assessments of $18,200 and interest of $596. There will be no operations or maintenance services provided under this district.

Based on the five-year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Gateway district will have sufficient revenue and cash balance to cover all loan payments and necessary expenditures through FY 2029-2030.

Page 71 of 745 ends

LMD No. 3 – Waterman Highlands:

Landscaping maintenance services in the Waterman area have been provided by LMD No. 3 – Waterman Highlands since 1987. However, due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2022-2023, the council adopted Resolution No. 2022-211 authorizing a $28,000 loan from the Intergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The purpose of the loan was to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, a majority protest against the formation of a replacement district was filed by the Waterman Highlands property owners, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings.

The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LMD No. 3 – Waterman Highlands.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the Waterman Highlands district is proposed to remain at the FY 2024 -2025 rate of $195 per parcel. The proposed assessment levy is the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range established in 1996.

The budget for this district includes operations, maintenance, administration, and the third of five annual loan repayments of $5,600. The total proposed revenue for this district is $59,313, which includes assessments of $47,190, a General Fund contribution of $11,662, and interest of $461. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Waterman Highlands district will have sufficient revenue and cash balance to cover al l required loan payments through FY 2027 -2028. However, due to rising administrative costs, fixed maximum assessment rates, and a depleted cash reserve, the district’s available budget for operating expenses is projected to have an average annual decrease of 12% from FY 2026-2027 through FY 2029-2030.

The decrease in available budget, along with the diminishing purchasing power over time due to inflation, will result in a decrease in the quantity and quality of services.

LLMD No. 5 – Smith Ranch:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Smith Ranch (also known as Rancho Solano) area have been provided by LLMD No. 5 – Smith Ranch since 1987. However, due to the increased cost of services over time, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

Page 72 of 745 ends

In FY 2022-2023, the City conducted a community engagement and Proposition 218 process to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. In June 2023, the Smith Ranch property owners filed a majority protest against the formation of a replacement district, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings. The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LLMD No. 5—Smith Ranch.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the Smith Ranch district is proposed to increase from the FY 2024-2025 rate of $723.79 per parcel to $740.43 per parcel. The proposed assessment levy is the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range, which was est ablished in 1999 and is adjusted each year by the October SF-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers CPI.

The budget for this district includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $927,116, which includes assessments of $888,516, a General Fund contribution of $35,373 and interest of $3,227. Special projects for this district include landscaping renovation near the security guard building on Rancho Solano Parkway and various irrigation repairs.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Smith Ranch district requires assessments to be levied at maximum rates and must supplement its annual revenue with an average of $29,000 from the reserve fund b alance each year to cover all necessary expenses through FY 2029 -2030. The reserve fund balance is projected to decrease from $322,736 in FY 2025-2026 to $179,469 in FY 2029-2030 (approximately 44%).

LMD No. 6 – Peppertree:

Landscaping maintenance servi ces in the Peppertree area have been provided by LMD No. 6 – Peppertree since 1987. Due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2022-2023, the council adopted Resolution No. 2022-212 authorizing a $28,000 loan from the Intergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The loan was intended to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, the Peppertree property owners filed a majority protest against the formation of a replacement district, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings. The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LMD No. 6—Peppertree.

The FY 2025 -2026 assessment levy for the Peppertree district is proposed to remain at the FY 2024-2025 rate of $60 per parcel. The proposed assessment levy is the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range established in 1996.

Page 73 of 745 ends

The budget for this district includes operations, maintenance, administration, and the third of five annual loan repayments of $5,600. The total proposed revenue f or this district is $28,725, which includes assessments of $28,320 and interest of $405. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Peppertree district will have sufficient revenue and cash balance to cover all required loan payments through FY 2027 -2028. However, due to the fixed maximum assessment rates, the district must supplement its annual revenue with an average of over $4,000 from the reserve cash balanc e each year to cover all necessary expenses through FY 2029 -2030. The reserve cash balance is projected to decrease from $40,446 in FY 2025 -2026 to $3,032 in FY 2029 -2030 (approximately 93%).

The district’s revenue and existing cash balance will allow the budget to remain relatively stable through FY 2029 -2030, but the quantity and quality of services will decrease as the district’s purchasing power diminishes over time due to inflation.

LLMD No. 7 – Rolling Hills:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance s ervices in the Rolling Hills area have been provided by LLMD No. 7 – Rolling Hills since 1988. However, due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2021-2022, the council adopted Resolution No. 2022-97 authorizing a $410,000 loan from the Intergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The purpose of the loan was to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, the Rolling Hills property owners filed a majority protest against the formation of a replacement district, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings. The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LLMD No. 7—Rolling Hills.

The FY 2025 -2026 assessment levy for the Rolling Hills district is proposed to remain at the FY 2024-2025 rates of $300 per parcel in the Rolling Hills development and $250 per parcel in the Serpas Ranch development. The assessments for commercial properties at the intersection of Hilborn Road and Lyon Road are proposed to increase by the October SF-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers CPI. These proposed assessment levies are the maximum rates allowable by the district’s adopted assessment ranges.

The budget for this district includes operations, maintenance, administration, and the third of five annual loan repayments of $82,000. The total proposed revenue for this district is $356,115, which includes assessments of $319,425, a General Fund contribution of $35,374, and interest of $1,316. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Page 74 of 745 ends

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Rolling Hills district budget for operating expenses will be reduced from $298,728 (as budgeted in FY 2024 - 2025) to $269,000 over the next three fiscal years to cover all required loan payments through FY 2027 -2028. Additionally, revenues will be supplemented with the district’ s reserve cash balance over the next five years. The reserve cash balance is projected to decrease from $131,589 in FY 2025-2026 to $10,223 in FY 2029-2030 (approximately 92%).

LLMD No. 8 – Kolob Estates:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Kolob area have been provided by LLMD No. 8 – Kolob Estates since 1989. Due to the increased cost of services over time and the district’s fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2022-2023, the City conducted a community engagement and Proposition 218 process to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. In June 2023, a majority protest against the formation of a replacement district was filed by the Kolob Estates property owners, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings. The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LLMD No. 8 – Kolob Estates.

The FY 2025 -2026 assessment levy for the Kolob district is proposed to remain at the FY 2024 - 2025 rate of $400 per parcel. The proposed assessment levy is the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range established in 1994.

The budg et for this district includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $53,703, which includes assessments of $52,000, a General Fund contribution of $1,040, and interest of $663. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Kolob district must supplement its annual revenue with an average of $12,500 from the reserve fund balance each year to cover all necessary expenses through FY 2029 -2030. The reserve cash balance is projected to decrease from $66,250 in FY 2025 -2026 to $3,350 in FY 2029 -2030 (approximately 95%).

The district’s revenue and existing cash balance will allow the budget to remain relatively stable through FY 2029 -2030, but the quantity and quality of services will decrease as the district’s purchasing power diminishes over time due to inflation.

LLMD No. 10 – Southbrook:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Southbrook area have b een provided by LLMD No. 10 – Southbrook since 1989.

Page 75 of 745 ends

The FY 2025 -2026 assessment levies for the Southbrook district are proposed to increase from the FY 2024-2025 rates as shown in Section 4 of the proposed Engineer’s Report. The proposed assessments do not exceed the maximum allowable rates adopted by the district.

The maximum assessment rates for parcels included in the original district formation are adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers CPI, and the maximum assessment rates for parcels included in Annexation Nos. 1 -10 are adjusted each year by the October SF-Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget for this district includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $740,358, which includes assessments of $733,212, General Fund contributions of $4,458, and interest of $2,689. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in t he Engineer’s Report, the Southbrook district will require assessments to be levied at maximum rates through FY 2029-2030 to provide all required services and achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b.

LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Paradise Valley area were provided by LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North from 1989 through June 30, 2023. Due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2021-2022, the council adopted Resolution No. 2022-98 authorizing a $175,000 loan from the Int ergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The loan was intended to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, in the absence of a majority protest, the council formed LLMD No. 2023 -11 (Paradise Valley) to replace LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, beginning July 1, 2023. The city will continue to collect assessments under LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North and utilize the district’s available fund balance to pay the annual loan installments through FY 2027 -2028. The council may consider the dissolution of this district in FY 2028-2029.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the Paradise Valley North district is proposed to increase from the FY 2024 -2025 rate of $14.66 per unit to $16.86 per unit. The increase to assessment levies is required to cover city staff administrative costs, which were not previously charged in FY 2024-2025. The proposed assessment levy does not exceed the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range established in 1995.

Page 76 of 745 ends

The budget for this district includes the third of five annual loan repayments of $35,000 and applicable administrative costs. The total proposed revenue is $23,520, which includes assessments of $22,998 and interest of $522. There will be no operations or maintenance services provided under this district.

Based on the five-year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Paradise Valley North district will have sufficient revenue and cash balance to cover all necessary expenditures and loan payments through FY 2027-2028.

LLMD No. 12 – Downtown Business District:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Downtown area have been provided by LLMD No. 12 – Downtown Business District since 1991. Due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2022-2023, the council adopted Resolution No. 2022-213 authorizing a $40,000 loan from the Intergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The purpose of the loan was to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, a majority protest against the formation of a replacement district was filed by the Downtown Business District property owners, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings. The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LLMD No. 12 – Downtown Business District.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levies for the Downtown Business District are proposed to remain at the amounts levied in FY 2024 -2025. The proposed assessment levies for individual parcels vary by parcel size and are the maximum rates allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range established in 1997.

The budget includes operations, maintenance, administration, and the third of five annual loan repayments of $8,000. The total proposed revenue for this district is $62,269, which includes assessments of $62,020 and interest of $2 49. There are no special projects planned f or this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Downtown Business District will have sufficient revenue and cash balance to cover all required loan payments through FY 2027 -2028. However, due to the dist rict’s fixed maximum assessment rates, the district must supplement its annual revenue with an average of over $5,000 from the reserve cash balance each year to cover all necessary expenses through FY 2029 -2030. The reserve cash balance is projected to dep lete from $49,982 in FY 2025 -2026 to $730 in FY 2029 - 2030.

Page 77 of 745 ends

The district’s revenue and existing cash balance will allow the budget for operating expenses to remain relatively stable through FY 2029 -2030, but the quantity and quality of services will decrease as the district’s purchasing power diminishes over time due to inflation.

LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the North Cordelia area have been provided by LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia since 1990. However, due to the increased cost of services over time and the fixed maximum assessment rates in the majority of the district, the revenue collected under this district was no longer sufficient to adequately fund the required services.

In FY 2021-2022, the council adopted Resolution No. 2022-299 authorizing a $151,000 loan from the Intergovernmental Loan Fund to the district. The purpose of the loan was to minimize the disruption of services while a community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out to form a replacement district with higher assessment rates. The loan is repayable over five years in equal annual installments beginning in FY 2023-2024 and does not bear interest.

In June 2023, a majority protest against the formation of a re placement district was filed by the North Cordelia property owners, and the council abandoned the formation proceedings. The City will continue to collect assessments and provide limited services under LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levies for the North Cordelia district are proposed to increase from the FY 2024-2025 rates as shown in Section 4 of the proposed Engineer’s Report. The proposed assessment levies do not exceed maximum rates adopted by the district.

The maximum assessment rates for parcels included in the original district formation were not approved with an annual CPI adjustment, however the maximum assessment rates for parcels included in Annexation Nos. 1-3 are adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget includes operations, maintenance, administration, and the third of five annual loan repayments of $30,200. The total proposed revenue for this district is $ 672,996, which includes assessments of $641,771, a General Fund contribution of $30,172, and interest of $1,054. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five-year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the North Cordelia district will have sufficient revenue and cash balance to cover all required loan payments through FY 2027-2028. However, the reserve cash balance is projected to decrease from $105,390 in FY 2025-2026 to $11,028 in FY 2029-2030 (approximately 88%).

The district’s revenue and existing cash balance will allow incremental increases to the budget for operating expenses through FY 2029 -2030, but the quantity and quality of services will decrease as the district’s purchasing power diminishes over time due to inflation.

Page 78 of 745 ends

LLMD No. 14 – Woodlake:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Woodlake area have been provided by LLMD No. 14 - Woodlake since 2001.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levies for the Woodlake district are proposed to increase from the FY 2024 -2025 rates as shown in Section 4 of the proposed Engineer’s Report. The proposed assessment levies do not exceed the maximum rates adopted by the district. All maximum assessment rates are adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget includes operatio ns, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $427,748, which includes assessments of $389,443, a General Fund contribution of $25,770, and interest of $12,535. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Woodlake district will require assessment levies to be increased approximately 7% each year to provide all required services and maintain the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b. Notwithstanding the annual increase, future assessment levies will be at or below the maximum allowable rate.

LLMD No. 15 – Gold Ridge:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in th e Gold Ridge area have been provided by LLMD No. 15 – Gold Ridge since 2001.

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levies for the Gold Ridge district are proposed to increase from the FY 2024-2025 rates as shown in Section 4 of the proposed Engineer’s Report. The F Y 2025-2026 assessment levies include an administrative adjustment from FY 2024 -2025. The FY 2024 -2025 maximum assessment rate for parcels in Annexation No. 1 was calculated based on an estimated CPI of 5% instead of the actual CPI of 2.4%. Since assessment levies for each parcel are based on a proportionate share of the total district budget, all parcels were affected. The corrected calculations result in a 1% or less assessment levy adjustment to each parcel in FY 2025-2026.

The proposed assessment levi es do not exceed the maximum rates adopted by the district. All maximum assessment rates are adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $555,046, which includes assessments of $524,631, a General Fund contribution of $20,395, and interest of $10,019. Special projects planned for this district include landscape renovation and repair.

Based on the five -year budg et projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Gold Ridge district will require assessment levies to be increased approximately 7% each year from FY 2026- 2027 through FY 2029 -2030 to provide all required services and maintain the appropriate cash

Page 79 of 745 ends

(65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991 -213b.

Notwithstanding the annual increase, future assessment levies will be at or below the maximum allowable rate.

LLMD No. 16 – Creekside at Cordelia:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Creekside area have been provided by LLMD No. 16 – Creekside at Cordelia since 2003.

The proposed FY 2025-2026 assessment levies for the Creekside at Cordelia district are proposed as follows: levies for parcels in the Enclave at Red Top development is proposed to increase from the FY 2024-2025 rate of $395.71 per unit to $405.20 per unit; and levies for parcels in all other subdivisions are proposed to increase from the FY 2024 -2025 rate of $398.62 per parcel to $408.18 per parcel.

The proposed assessment levies are the maximum rates adopted by the district. All maximum rates are adjusted each year by the October SF-Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget for this district includes opera tions, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $92,950, which includes assessments of $84,106, General Fund contributions of $8,555, and interest of $290. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Creekside at Cordelia district will require assessments to be levied at maximum rates through FY 2029 -2030 to provide all required services and achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b.

LLMD No. 17 – Chadbourne-Beck-Cordelia (CBC):

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the commercial area between Chadbourne Road, Beck Avenue, and Cordelia Road have been provided by LLMD No. 17 – CBC since 2003.

The total FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the CBC district is proposed at $306,927, which is a 9% increase from the total FY 2024-2025 assessment levy of $281,585. Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on parcel size and are below the maximum allowable rate for each parcel established in 2003. All maximum rates are adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland- Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget for this district includes operations, mainte nance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $314,026, which includes assessments of $306,927 and interest of $7,099. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five-year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the CBC district will require assessment levies to be increased approximately 9% each year through FY 2029-2030 to provide all required services and achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve

Page 80 of 745 ends

balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b. Notwithstanding the annual increase, future assessment levies will be at or below the maximum allowable rates.

LLMD No. 18 – Gold Ridge Park:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services at the Gary Falati Park (also known as the Gold Ridge Park) have been provided by LLMD No. 18 – Gold Ridge Park since 2008.

The FY 2025 -2026 assessment levies for the Gold Ridge Park district are proposed to decrease from the FY 2024 -2025 rates as shown in Section 4 of the proposed Enginee r’s Report. The proposed assessment levies do not exceed maximum rates adopted by the district. All maximum assessment rates are adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $118,273, which includes assessments of $95,684, a General Fund contribution of $18,265, and interest of $4,324. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the assessment levies for the Gold Ridge Park district will remain the same each year through FY 2029-2030. The district will continue to supplement revenue with the existing fund balance reserves to achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b.

LLMD No. 19 – Corporate Commons:

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the area near Suisun Valley Road and Business Center Drive have been provided by LLMD No. 19 – Corporate Commons since 2003.

The total FY 2025 -2026 assessment levy for the Corporate Commons district is proposed to remain at the same total assessments levied in FY 2024 -2025. Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on parcel size and are below the maximum allowable rate for each parcel established in 2010. All maximum assessment rates are adjusted each year by the October SF - Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI.

The budget for this d istrict includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $129,548, which includes assessments of $127,192, and interest of $2,356. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the f ive-year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the Corporate Commons district will require an average annual increase of 17% to the assessments levied (beginning in FY 2026 -2027) to provide all required services and achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b.

Page 81 of 745 ends

LLMD No. 2023-1 (Gateway):

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Solano Mall and surrounding commercial area have been provided by LLMD No. 2023-1 (Gateway) since 2023. This district was established to replace LLMD No. 1 – Gateway.

The total FY 2025 -2026 assessment levy for the new Gateway district is proposed at $349,059, which is a less than 1% increase from the total FY 2024 -2025 assessment levy of $346,288.

Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on multiple factors, as described in Sections 2- 6 of the proposed Engineer’s Report, and are below the maximum allowable rates established in 2023. All maximum assessment rates are adjusted each ye ar by the February SF -Oakland- Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI, not to exceed 3%.

The budget for this district includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $441,160, which includes assessments of $349,059, a General Fund contribution of $89,670, and interest of $2,431. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the new Gateway district will require an average annual increase of 3% to the assessments levied through FY 2029- 2030 to provide all required services and achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b.

LLMD No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley):

Landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Paradise Valley area have been provided by LLMD No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley) since 2023. This district was established to replace LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North.

The total FY 2025 -2026 assessment l evy for the new Paradise Valley district is proposed at $571,332, which is an approximate 1% decrease from the total FY 2024-2025 assessment levy of $577,679. Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on multiple factors , as described in Sections 2-6 of the proposed Engineer’s Report, and are below the maximum allowable rates established in 2023. All maximum assessment rates are adjusted each year by the February SF - Oakland-Hayward All Urban Consumers CPI, not to exceed 3%.

The budget for this distr ict includes operations, maintenance, and administration. The total proposed revenue for this district is $764,141, which includes assessments of $571,332, a General Fund contribution of $190,867, and interest of $1,942. There are no special projects planned for this district.

Based on the five -year budget projections included in the Engineer’s Report, the new Paradise Valley district will require an average annual increase of 3% to the assessments levied through FY 2029-2030 to provide all required services and achieve the appropriate cash (65%) and repair (25%) reserve balances as described in Resolution No. 1991-213b.

Page 82 of 745 ends

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total proposed FY 2025 -2026 revenue for all 18 LLMDs is $5,785, 804, which includes assessments of $5,262,025, General Fund (Fund 101) contributions of $471,601, and interest of $52,178. The City’s General Fund contributions cover a portion of the costs for street lighting, arterial landscaping, and irrigation, which have been determined to be a general public be nefit rather than a special benefit to the district property owners.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
If the council has any questions regarding the adoption of these resolutions, this item may be rescheduled until the n ext council meeting to allow staff to provide the necessary supporting documentation.

COORDINATED WITH
N/A

STAFF CONTACT
Chris Lewis, Sr. Management Analyst
(707) 428-7089
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 1 - Gateway Attachment 3: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 1 - Gateway Attachment 4: Proposed Resolution - LMD No. 3 - Waterman Highlands Attachment 5: Proposed Engineer's Report - LMD No. 3 - Waterman Highlands Attachment 6: Proposed Resolution- LLMD No. 5- Smith Ranch Attachment 7: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 5 - Smith Ranch Attachment 8: Proposed Resolution - LMD No. 6 - Peppertree Attachment 9: Proposed Engineer's Report - LMD No. 6 - Peppertree Attachment 10: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 7 - Rolling Hills Attachment 11: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 7 - Rolling Hills Attachment 12: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 8 - Kolob Estates Attachment 13: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 8 - Kolob Estates Attachment 14: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 10 - Southbrook Attachment 15: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 10 - Southbrook Attachment 16: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 11 - Paradise Valley North Attachment 17: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 11 - Paradise Valley North Attachment 18: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 12 - Downtown Business District Attachment 19: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 12 - Downtown Business District Attachment 20: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 13 - North Cordelia Attachment 21: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 13 - North Cordelia

Page 83 of 745 ends

Attachment 22: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 14 -Woodlake Attachment 23: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 14 - Woodlake Attachment 24: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 15 - Gold Ridge Attachment 25: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 15 - Gold Ridge Attachment 26: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 16 - Creekside at Cordelia Attachment 27: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 16 - Creekside at Cordelia Attachment 28: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 17 – CBC
Attachment 29: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 17 - CBC Attachment 30: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 18 - Gold Ridge Park Attachment 31: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 18 - Gold Ridge Park Attachment 32: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 19 - Corporate Commons Attachment 33: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 19 - Corporate Commons Attachment 34: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 2023-1 (Gateway) Attachment 35: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 2023-1 (Gateway) Attachment 36: Proposed Resolution - LLMD No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley) Attachment 37: Proposed Engineer's Report - LLMD No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley)

Page 84 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-80

GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 ENGINEER’S REPORT,

DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS, AND

PROVIDING NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 – GATEWAY

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1991, th e City C ouncil adopted Resolution No. 91 -136, A Continuing Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment Districts; and

WHEREAS, the fiscal year (FY) 2022-2023 assessment revenue for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 – Gateway (LLMD No. 1 or District) was insufficient to provide a level of landscape maintenance services comparable to the level of services provided in FY 2021-2022; and

WHEREAS, on August 16, 2022, the council issued an Intergovernmental Loan of $165,000 (Loan) to LLMD No. 1 to supplement assessment revenue and minimize the disruption of services through FY 2022-2023 while the City conducted a balloting process in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known as Proposition 218 , to propose to property owners the formation of LLMD No. 2023-1 (Gateway), a new maintenance district with higher assessments that would adequately fund the services; and

WHEREAS, the loan was issued at 0% interest with a five -year repayment term commencing in FY 2023-2024 and concluding at the end of FY 2027-2028; and

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2023 , based upon the tabulation of the assessment ballots, the council determined that a majority protest, as defined in Section 53753 of the Government Code, was not filed by the property owners in the proposed LLMD No. 2023 -1 (Gateway) and the district was formed; and

WHEREAS, as of July 1, 2023, a ll landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Gateway community have been funded by assessments levied under the new LLMD No. 2023-1 (Gateway); and

WHEREAS, the City will continue to levy assessments under LLMD No. 1 for the purpose of repaying the Loan and any other eligible costs as approved by the council.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. Pursuant to said resolution, the engineer designated therein prepared a report in accordance with Section 22565 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code for the

Page 85 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-80

Page 2 ends

District. Said report, on file in the office of the city clerk, as supplemented by the supplemental report for FY 2025-2026, ordered by the council and on file in the office of the city clerk, has been duly considered by this council and is hereby deemed sufficient and given preliminary approval.

Said report, as supplemented, shall constitute the engineer’s report for FY 2025-2026 (Engineer’s Report).

Section 2. It is the intention of this council to levy and collect assessments within LLMD No. 1 for FY 202 5-2026. No operations or maintenance services will be provided. The assessments levied in FY 2025-2026 will be applied to the third of five annual loan repayments of $33,000 and applicable administrative costs.

Section 3. Said District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the boundary map of the District on file with the city clerk in the City of Fairfield.

Section 4. The total FY 2025 -2026 assessment levy for the Gateway district is proposed at $18,200, which is a 30% increase from the total FY 2024 -2025 assessment levy of $14,000. The increase to assessment levies is required to cover City staff administrative costs, which were not previously charged in FY 2024-2025. Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on parcel size and are below the maximum allowable rates established in 1995.

Section 5. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the city clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements (none to be provided in FY 2025 -2026), the boundaries of the District, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District . Any public property owned by any public agency or in use in the performance of a public function within the District may be assessed.

Section 6. This council hereby orders that a public hearing shall be held before this council in the regular meeting p lace thereof at the Council Chamber, Civic Center, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California, or in any other manner as specified on the regular meeting agenda, as follows:

The public hearing shall be held on July 1, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, for the purposes of this council’s determination whether the public interest, convenience, and necessity require that the proposed levy be made, and this council’s final action upon the Engineer’s Report and the assessment therein. The agenda will be available on the City’s website, www.fairfield.ca.gov, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Section 7. The city clerk shall cause notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a copy of this resolution once in the Daily Repu blic, a newspaper published and circulated in the city , at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing specified in this resolution.

Page 86 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-80

Page 3 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

Page 87 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 – GATEWAY

ENGINEER’S REPORT

FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

CONTENTS

1. Assessment

2. Method of Apportionment

3. Description of Work

4. Summary Statement of Influencing Factors for Maintenance District Budget

5. District Budget

6. Assessments for Each Parcel

Page 88 of 745 ends

1 ASSESSMENT

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1991, the City Council of the City of Fairfield, California (Council), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted Resolution No. 91-136, A Continuing Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Reports for Maintenance Assessment Districts; and

WHEREAS, said resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565 et seq. of said Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council, hereby makes the following assessment to cover the third of five annual loan repayments of $33,000 for the $165,000 loan issued by the Council from the General Fund to Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 – Gateway (District) on August 16, 2022, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto.

The amount to be paid for the expenses is as shown in section 5 of this report.

Reference is made to the original assessment diagram for the District dated July 1984, which is hereby amended by the assessment roll contained herein.

I do hereby assess the net amount upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within the District by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from said loan.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the assessor's maps of the County of Solano for the fiscal year (FY) 202 5- 2026 and includes all such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right of way. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the county recorder of said County.

Dated: _______________ ____________________________
Ryan Panganiban
City Engineer/Asst. Director of Public Works
R.C.E. No. 74795
Expires 12/31/25

Page 89 of 745 ends

2 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

The total FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the Gateway district is proposed at $18,200 which is a 30% increase from the total FY 2024 -2025 assessment levy of $14,000. The increased assessments are required to cover City staff administrative costs, which we re not previously charged to the District in FY 2024- 2025. Assessment rates for each parcel vary depending on parcel size and are below the maximum allowable rate for each parcel established in 1995.

Page 90 of 745 ends

3 DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED WORK

No operations and maintenance services will be provided.

Page 91 of 745 ends

4 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INFLUENCING FACTORS

FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET

On August 16, 2022, t he Council issued a General Fund l oan of $165,000 to the District to supplement assessment revenue and support services through FY 2022 -2023. The loan was issued at 0% interest with a five -year repayment term, commencing in FY 2023 -2024 and concluding at the end of FY 2027-2028.

Assessments levied in FY 2025-2026 will be applied to the third of five annual loan re payments of $33,000 and the costs and expenses incidental thereto.

All landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Gateway area will be provided under Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway), which was formed on June 7, 2023, to replace LLMD No. 1 – Gateway.

Page 92 of 745 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 - GATEWAY FUND 168
FY 2025-2026 PROJECTIONS
BUDGET
OBJECT FY23-24 Actual FY24-25 Actual* FY24-25 Original FY24-25 Proj FY25-26 Proj FY26-27 Proj FY27-28 Proj** FY28-29 Proj FY29-30 Proj 6106 - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 33,000 7,000 14,000 14,000 18,200 18,200 18,200 - - 6401 - INT INC ON POOLED INVESTMENTS 2,866 1,312 500 500 596 402 203 1 1 TOTAL REVENUE 35,865 8,312 14,500 14,500 18,796 18,602 18,403 1 1 City Staff Costs
8101 - SALARIES - - - - 2,473 2,571 2,648 - - 8102 - AS NEEDED LABOR - - - - - - - - - 8103 - OVERTIME - - - - - - - - - 8105 - LEAVE TIME - - - - - - - - - 8107 - EMERGENCY PAID SICK LEAVE - - - - - - - - - 8108 - SUPPLEMENTAL SICK LEAVE - - - - - - - - - 8109 - EMERGENCY DUTY PAY (EOC) - - - - - - - - - 8111 - BUDGETED SALARY SAVINGS - - - - (126) (131) (135) - - 8201 - LEAVE PAYOFFS - - - - - - - - - 8207 - PERS CONTRIBUTIONS - - - - - - - - - 8209 - MEDICARE TAX - - - - 36 38 39 - - 8210 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION - - - - 257 267 275 - - 8211 - ICMA VANTAGECARE RETIREE HLTH - - - - 9 9 9 - - 8212 - POB ER RATE - - - - 97 98 101 - - 8213 - PARS CONTRIBUTIONS - - - - - - - - - 8216 - SOCIAL SECURITY (PT) - - - - - - - - - 8219 - UNIFORM/EQUIP/BOOT/AUTO - - - - 10 10 10 - - 8220 - MEDICAL - - - - 260 273 282 - - 8221 - DENTAL AND VISION - - - - 15 29 29 - - 8231 - BUDGETED BENEFITS SAVINGS - - - - - - - - - 8235 - LIFE/DISABILITY INSURANCE - - - - 9 9 9 - - 8238 - SPECIAL COMPENSATION - - - - - - - - - 8240 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-CLASSIC - - - - 97 96 99 - - 8241 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-PEPRA - - - - 155 159 164 - - 8242 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-UNFUND LIAB - - - - 706 770 793 - - 8814 - WC INSURANCE CHARGES - - - - 81 118 121 - - 8830 - VACATION/SICK LEAVE CHARGES - - - - 212 214 221 - - Subtotal - City Staff Costs - - - - 4,291 4,531 4,667 - - Other Administration
8305 - COMPUTER EXPENSE < $5000 - - - - - - - - - 8836 - COST ALLOCATION - - - - - - - - - 8911 - OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 5,274 - - - - - - - - 9003 - ADVERTISING - 347 700 700 721 743 765 - - 9038 - COUNTY ADMIN EXPENSES 330 70 200 200 182 182 182 - - Subtotal - Other Administration 5,604 417 900 900 903 925 947 - - Operations
8405 - LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE - - - - - - - - - 8441 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - - - - 8702 - PG&E-ELECTRICITY - - - - - - - - - 8704 - WATER SERVICES - - - - - - - - - 9028 - OTHER EXPENSES - - - - - - - - - 9505 - PJCT CST-CONSTRUCTION - - - - - - - - - Subtotal - Operations - - - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENSE 5,604 417 900 900 5,194 5,456 5,614 - - NET SURPLUS/DEFICIT 30,261 7,895 13,600 13,600 13,602 13,146 12,789 1 1

FUND BALANCE
Beginning Fund Balance (85,928) (54,145) (54,145) (54,145) (40,545) (26,944) (13,797) (1,008) (1,006) Net Surplus/Deficit 30,261 7,895 13,600 13,600 13,602 13,146 12,789 1 1 Mkt Val-Unrealized Gain/Loss 1,522 1,147 - - - - - - - ENDING FUND BALANCE (54,145) (45,104) (40,545) (40,545) (26,944) (13,797) (1,008) (1,006) (1,005)

CASH BALANCE
Beginning Cash Balance 95,002 78,285 78,285 78,285 59,601 40,203 20,349 139 140 Beginning Receivables 430 716 716 716 - - - - - Ending Receiveables (716) - - - Beginning Accounts Payable (13,692) - - - - - - - - Ending Accounts Payable - - - - Beginning balance: Loan from City (165,000) (132,000) (132,000) (132,000) (99,000) (66,000) (33,000) Ending balance: Loan from City 132,000 99,000 99,000 99,000 66,000 33,000 - Net Surplus/Deficit 30,261 7,895 13,600 13,600 13,602 13,146 12,789 1 1 ENDING CASH BALANCE 78,285 53,896 59,601 59,601 40,203 20,349 139 140 141 *As of 02/28/25
**Intergovernmental Loan will be paid in full by the end of FY 27-28

Page 93 of 745 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 - GATEWAY FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
1 33 220 1 994.10
2 33 220 2 494.84
3 33 220 3 176.72
4 33 220 4 1,192.92
5 33 220 5 220.91
6 33 220 7 574.36
7 33 220 8 176.72
8 33 220 11 627.38
9 33 230 74 1,944.01
10 33 230 75 795.28
11 33 230 77 366.43
12 33 230 78 320.92
13 33 230 79 706.51
14 33 230 80 567.60
15 33 230 81 258.65
16 33 230 82 213.15
17 33 230 83 220.33
18 33 230 84 838.24
19 33 230 85 19.15
20 33 230 87 225.12
21 33 230 88 407.14
22 33 230 89 76.63
23 33 230 90 21.55
24 33 240 1 75.10
26 33 240 4 45.94
27 33 240 5 528.41
28 33 240 7 110.45
29 33 240 8 795.28
30 33 240 10 30.92
31 33 240 11 132.54
32 33 240 12 441.82
33 33 240 13 44.18
34 33 240 14 596.46
35 33 240 16 1,414.90
36 33 240 17 21.01
37 33 240 18 83.81
38 33 240 19 635.01
39 33 240 20 76.44
40 33 250 1 309.27
41 33 250 2 419.73
42 33 250 3 5.74
43 33 250 4 397.64
44 33 250 5 198.82
45 33 250 6 397.64
18,199.77

Page 1 of 1 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-81

GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 ENGINEER’S REPORT,

DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS, AND PROVIDING NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 – WATERMAN HIGHLANDS

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1991, th e City C ouncil adopted Resolution No. 91 -136, A Continuing Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment Districts; and

WHEREAS, the fiscal year (FY) 2022-2023 assessment revenue for Landscaping Maintenance District No. 3 – Waterman Highlands (LMD No. 3 or District) was insufficient to provide a level of landscape maintenance services comparable to the level of services provided in FY 202 1-2022; and

WHEREAS, on August 16, 2022, the council issued an Intergovernmental Loan of $28,000 (Loan) to LMD No. 3 to supplement assessment revenue and minimize the disruption of services through FY 2022-2023 while the City conducted a balloting process in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known as Proposition 218 , to propose to property owners the formation of LMD No. 2023 -3 (Waterman Highlands ), a new maintenance district with higher assessments that would adequately fund the services; and

WHEREAS, the loan was issued at 0% interest with a five -year repayment term, commencing in FY 2023-2024 and concluding at the end of FY 2027-2028; and

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2023 , based upon the tabulation of the assessment ballots, the council determined that a majority protest, as defined in Section 53753 of the Government Code, was filed by the property owners in the proposed LMD No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands); and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 22593 of the Streets and Highways Code, the council abandoned formation proceedings; and

WHEREAS, all landscaping maintenance services in the Waterman Highlands community will continue to be funded by assessments levied under the existing LMD No. 3.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. Pursuant to said resolution, the engineer designated therein prepared a report in accordance with Section 22565 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code for the District. Said report, on fi le in the office of the city clerk, as supplemented by the supplemental report for FY 2025-2026, ordered by the council and on file in the office of the city clerk, has been

Page 95 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-81

Page 2 ends

duly considered by this council and is hereby deemed sufficient and given prelimin ary approval.

Said report, as supplemented, shall constitute the engineer’s report for FY 2025-2026 (Engineer’s Report).

Section 2. It is the intention of this council to levy and collect assessments within the District for FY 2025-2026. In addition to the improvements, t he assessments levied in fiscal year 202 5- 2026 will be applied to the third of five annual loan repayments of $5,600. The improvements to be financed by the District are located in the street rights-of-way and perimeter areas within the boundaries of the District and may be briefly described landscaping, which may include turf, ground cover, trees, shrubs, plants, open space, weed abatement, ornamental lighting structures, irrigation, and drainage systems, trails, wetlands, parks, and appurtenant facilities.

The substantial changes to be made from the previous fiscal year may include the deferral, elimination, or decrease in the frequency of certain landscaping services and irrigation practices.

Section 3. Said District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the boundary map of the District on file with the city clerk in the City of Fairfield.

Section 4. The FY 2025-2026 assessment for the District is proposed to remain at the FY 2024-2025 rate of $ 195 per parcel. The assessment is the maximum rate allowable by the District’s adopted assessment range established in 1996.

Section 5. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the city clerk, for a full and detailed description of th e improvements, the boundaries of the District , and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Any public property owned by any public agency or in use in the performance of a public function within the District may be assessed.

Section 6. This council hereby orders that a public hearing shall be held before this council in the regular meeting place thereof at the Council Chamber, Civic Center, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California, or in any other manner as specified on the regular meeting agenda, as follows:

The public hearing shall be held on July 1, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, for the purposes of this council’s determination whether the public interest, convenience, and necessity require that the proposed levy be made, and this council’s final action upon the Engineer’s Report and the assessment therein. The agenda will be available on the City’s website, www.fairfield.ca.gov, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Section 7. The city clerk shall cause notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a copy of this resolution once in the Daily Republic, a newspaper published and circulated in the city , at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing specified in this resolution.

Page 96 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-81

Page 3 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

Page 97 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 – WATERMAN HIGHLANDS

ENGINEER’S REPORT

FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

CONTENTS

1. Assessment

2. Method of Apportionment

3. Description of Work

4. Summary Statement of Influencing Factors for Maintenance District Budget

5. District Budget

6. Assessments for Each Parcel

Page 98 of 745 ends

1 ASSESSMENT

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1991, the City Council of the City of Fairfield, California (Council), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted Resolution No. 91-136, A Continuing Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Reports for Maintenance Assessment Districts; and

WHEREAS, said resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565 et seq. of said Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council, hereby makes the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto for the Landscaping Maintenance District No 3 – Waterman Highlands (District).

The amount to be paid for the expenses is as shown in section 5 of this report.

Reference is made to the original assessment diagram for the District dated June 1986, which is hereby amended by the assessment roll contained herein.

I do hereby assess the net amount upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within the District by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of the improvements.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the assessor's maps of the County of Solano for the fiscal year (FY) 2025- 2026 and includes all such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right of way. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the county recorder of said County.

Dated: ___________________ ____________________________ Ryan Panganiban
City Engineer/Asst. Director of Public Works
R.C.E. No. 74795
Expires 12/31/25

Page 99 of 745 ends

2 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

The total assessment is apportioned on an equal basis to each of the assessable lots and parcels within the District. Un- subdivided areas within the District will be assessed based on the lots proposed within each un-subdivided area.

Page 100 of 745 ends

3 DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED WORK

The following is a brief description of the improvements that may be maintained contingent upon available budget and resources:

1. Easterly and westerly sides of Ten Gate Road commencing at the intersection of Ten Gate Road and Waterman Boulevard and extending northerly 1700 feet along Ten Gate Road to a point approximately 100 feet north of the intersection of Canton Lane and Ten Gate Road.

2. Northerly side of Waterman Boulevard commencing at a point on Waterman Boulevard 650 feet west of its intersection with Ten Gate Road and extending easterly 1800 feet along Waterman Boulevard to its intersection with Hilborn Road. Any turf between the curb and sidewalk within this reach shall be excluded from the maintenance district.

3. Westerly side of Hilborn Road commencing at the intersection of Waterman Boulevard and Hilborn Road and extending northerly along Hilborn Road to its intersection with Vista Grande. Any turf between the curb and sidewalk within this reach shall be excluded from the maintenance district.

4. All lands owned by the City of Fairfield designated as open space within the District and encompassing approximately 13 acres.

5. The open space area and bike trail adjacent to the westerly boundary of the District between Waterman Boulevard and Vista Grande are excluded.

6. The maintenance of all other landscape improvements necessary to maintain the facilities within the District.

7. No costs associated with the streetlights shall be borne by the District.

Page 101 of 745 ends

4 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INFLUENCING FACTORS

FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET

The FY 2025-2026 assessment rate for the Waterman Highlands district is proposed to remain at the FY 2024-2025 rate of $195 per parcel. The assessment is the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range established in 1996.

On August 16, 2022, t he Council issued a General Fund l oan of $28,000 to the District to supplement assessment revenue and support services through FY 2022 -2023. The loan was issued at 0% interest with a five -year repayment term, commencing in FY 2023 -2024 and concluding at the end of FY 2027-2028.

Assessments levied in FY 2025-2026 will be applied to the third of five annual loan repayments of $5,600.

Page 102 of 745 ends

LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 - WATERMAN HIGHLANDS FUND 169
FY 2025-2026 BUDGET PROJECTIONS
BUDGET
OBJECT FY23-24 Actual FY24-25 Actual* FY24-25 Original FY24-25 Proj FY25-26 Proj FY26-27 Proj FY27-28 Proj** FY28-29 Proj FY29-30 Proj 6106 - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 47,190 23,595 47,190 47,190 47,190 47,190 47,190 47,190 47,190 6401 - INT INC ON POOLED INVESTMENTS 1,831 879 200 404 461 262 86 16 13 7391 - MISC CONTRA REVENUE 8,810 4,405 8,000 8,000 7,500 6,250 3,250 3,000 2,500 7600 - TRANSFERS IN 23,209 2,775 4,162 4,162 4,162 4,162 4,162 4,162 4,162 7601 - TRANS IN GENERAL FUND 011 - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUE 81,040 31,653 59,552 59,756 59,313 57,864 54,688 54,368 53,865 City Staff Costs
8101 - SALARIES 9,351 5,646 11,729 11,729 10,945 11,261 11,599 11,947 12,306 8102 - AS NEEDED LABOR - - - - - - - - - 8103 - OVERTIME 114 35 - 35 - - - - - 8105 - LEAVE TIME 1,620 1,679 - 1,679 - - - - - 8107 - EMERGENCY PAID SICK LEAVE - - - - - - - - - 8108 - SUPPLEMENTAL SICK LEAVE - - - - - - - - - 8109 - EMERGENCY DUTY PAY (EOC) - - - - - - - - - 8111 - BUDGETED SALARY SAVINGS - - (590) (590) (551) (567) (584) (601) (619) 8201 - LEAVE PAYOFFS - - - - - - - - - 8207 - PERS CONTRIBUTIONS - - - - - - - - - 8209 - MEDICARE TAX 159 122 168 168 156 161 166 171 176 8210 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION 823 561 875 875 872 900 926 954 983 8211 - ICMA VANTAGECARE RETIREE HLTH 60 33 60 60 51 51 53 54 56 8212 - POB ER RATE 416 310 464 464 432 432 445 458 472 8213 - PARS CONTRIBUTIONS - - - - - - - - - 8216 - SOCIAL SECURITY (PT) - - - - - - - - - 8219 - UNIFORM-EQUIP-BOOT-AUTO 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8220 - MEDICAL 2,198 1,309 2,500 2,500 1,681 1,780 1,834 1,889 1,946 8221 - DENTAL AND VISION 135 74 149 149 85 160 165 169 175 8231 - BUDGETED BENEFITS SAVINGS - - - - - - - - - 8235 - LIFE/DISABILITY INSURANCE 39 25 41 41 39 39 41 42 43 8238 - SPECIAL COMPENSATION 24 15 24 24 36 36 37 38 39 8240 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-CLASSIC 446 296 462 462 452 446 459 473 487 8241 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-PEPRA 749 475 775 775 662 669 689 709 731 8242 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-UNFUND LIAB 1,825 1,899 2,914 2,914 3,133 3,383 3,485 3,589 3,697 8814 - WC INSURANCE CHARGES 300 253 385 385 359 517 532 548 565 8830 - VACATION/SICK LEAVE CHARGES 517 648 1,004 1,004 938 938 966 995 1,025 Subtotal - City Staff Costs 18,786 13,389 20,970 22,684 19,301 20,216 20,822 21,447 22,090 Other Administration
8305 - COMPUTER EXPENSE < $5000 - - - - - - - - - 8836 - COST ALLOCATION - - - - - - - - - 8911 - OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 4,434 - - - - - - - - 9003 - ADVERTISING 403 - 700 700 721 743 765 788 811 9038 - COUNTY ADMIN EXPENSES 472 236 500 472 472 472 472 472 472 Subtotal - Other Administration 5,309 236 1,200 1,172 1,193 1,215 1,237 1,260 1,283 Operations
8334 - STREET LIGHTS - - - - - - - - - 8404 - WEED ABATEMENT - - 5,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 8405 - LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE 7,255 7,518 18,600 12,888 13,081 13,474 11,000 10,000 10,000 8441 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - - - - 8704 - WATER SERVICES 34,245 21,576 25,000 30,000 30,000 25,000 13,000 12,000 10,000 9028 - OTHER EXPENSES - 1,200 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 9505 - PJCT CST-CONSTRUCTION - - - - - - - - - Subtotal - Operations 41,501 30,294 53,600 51,888 53,081 48,474 34,000 32,000 30,000 TOTAL EXPENSE 65,596 43,919 75,770 75,744 73,575 69,904 56,059 54,706 53,373 NET SURPLUS/DEFICIT 15,444 (12,265) (16,218) (15,988) (14,262) (12,040) (1,371) (338) 491

FUND BALANCE
Beginning Fund Balance 27,987 44,516 44,516 44,516 28,528 14,267 2,227 856 517 Net Surplus/Deficit 15,444 (12,265) (16,218) (15,988) (14,262) (12,040) (1,371) (338) 491 Mkt Val-Unrealized Gain/Loss 1,084 752 - - - - - - - ENDING FUND BALANCE 44,516 33,003 28,298 28,528 14,267 2,227 856 517 1,009

CASH BALANCE
Beginning Cash Balance 65,386 68,749 68,749 68,749 46,081 26,219 8,579 1,608 1,270 Beginning Receivables 240 470 470 470 - - - - - Ending Receiveables (470) - - - - - - - - Beginning Accounts Payable (7,803) (1,550) (1,550) (1,550) - - - - - Ending Accounts Payable 1,550 - - - - - - - - Beginning balance: Loan from City (28,000) (22,400) (22,400) (22,400) (16,800) (11,200) (5,600) - - Ending balance: Loan from City 22,400 16,800 16,800 16,800 11,200 5,600 - - - Net Surplus/Deficit 15,444 (12,265) (16,218) (15,988) (14,262) (12,040) (1,371) (338) 491 ENDING CASH BALANCE 68,749 49,803 45,850 46,081 26,219 8,579 1,608 1,270 1,761 *As of 02/28/2025
**Intergovernmental Loan will be paid in full by the end of FY 27-28

Page 103 of 745 ends

LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 - WATERMAN HIGHLANDS FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
1 156 81 1 195.00
2 156 81 2 195.00
3 156 81 3 195.00
4 156 81 4 195.00
5 156 81 5 195.00
6 156 81 6 195.00
7 156 81 7 195.00
8 156 81 8 195.00
9 156 81 9 195.00
10 156 81 10 195.00
11 156 81 11 195.00
12 156 81 12 195.00
13 156 81 13 195.00
14 156 81 14 195.00
15 156 81 15 195.00
16 156 81 16 195.00
17 156 81 17 195.00
18 156 81 18 195.00
19 156 81 19 195.00
20 156 82 1 195.00
21 156 82 2 195.00
22 156 82 3 195.00
23 156 82 4 195.00
24 156 82 5 195.00
25 156 82 6 195.00
26 156 82 7 195.00
27 156 82 8 195.00
28 156 82 9 195.00
29 156 82 10 195.00
30 156 82 11 195.00
31 156 82 12 195.00
32 156 82 13 195.00
33 156 82 14 195.00
34 156 82 15 195.00
35 156 82 16 195.00
36 156 82 17 195.00
37 156 82 18 195.00
38 156 82 19 195.00
39 156 82 20 195.00
40 156 82 21 195.00
41 156 82 22 195.00
42 156 82 23 195.00
43 156 82 24 195.00
44 156 82 25 195.00
45 156 82 26 195.00
46 156 82 27 195.00
47 156 82 29 195.00
48 156 82 30 195.00
49 156 82 31 195.00

Page 1 of 5 ends

LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 - WATERMAN HIGHLANDS FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
50 156 83 1 195.00
51 156 83 2 195.00
52 156 83 3 195.00
53 156 83 4 195.00
54 156 83 5 195.00
55 156 83 6 195.00
56 156 83 7 195.00
57 156 91 1 195.00
58 156 91 2 195.00
59 156 91 3 195.00
60 156 91 4 195.00
61 156 91 5 195.00
62 156 91 6 195.00
63 156 91 7 195.00
64 156 91 8 195.00
65 156 92 1 195.00
66 156 92 2 195.00
67 156 92 3 195.00
68 156 92 4 195.00
69 156 92 5 195.00
70 156 92 6 195.00
71 156 93 1 195.00
72 156 93 2 195.00
73 156 93 3 195.00
74 156 93 4 195.00
75 156 93 5 195.00
76 156 93 6 195.00
77 156 93 8 195.00
78 156 93 9 195.00
79 156 93 11 195.00
80 156 93 13 195.00
81 156 93 15 195.00
82 156 93 17 195.00
83 156 93 19 195.00
84 156 93 21 195.00
85 156 93 22 195.00
86 156 93 23 195.00
87 156 93 24 195.00
88 156 93 25 195.00
89 156 93 26 195.00
90 156 93 27 195.00
91 156 93 28 195.00
92 156 93 29 195.00
93 156 93 30 195.00
94 156 93 31 195.00
95 156 93 32 195.00
96 156 93 33 195.00
97 156 93 34 195.00
98 156 93 35 195.00

Page 2 of 5 ends

LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 - WATERMAN HIGHLANDS FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
99 156 93 36 195.00
100 156 93 37 195.00
101 156 93 38 195.00
102 156 94 1 195.00
103 156 94 2 195.00
104 156 94 3 195.00
105 156 94 4 195.00
106 156 94 5 195.00
107 156 94 6 195.00
108 156 94 7 195.00
109 156 94 8 195.00
110 156 94 9 195.00
111 156 94 10 195.00
112 156 94 11 195.00
113 156 94 12 195.00
114 156 94 13 195.00
115 156 94 14 195.00
116 156 94 15 195.00
117 156 94 16 195.00
118 156 94 17 195.00
119 156 94 18 195.00
120 156 94 19 195.00
121 156 94 20 195.00
122 156 94 21 195.00
123 156 94 22 195.00
124 156 94 23 195.00
125 156 94 25 195.00
126 156 101 1 195.00
127 156 101 2 195.00
128 156 101 3 195.00
129 156 101 4 195.00
130 156 101 5 195.00
131 156 101 6 195.00
132 156 101 7 195.00
133 156 101 8 195.00
134 156 101 9 195.00
135 156 101 10 195.00
136 156 101 11 195.00
137 156 101 12 195.00
138 156 101 13 195.00
139 156 101 14 195.00
140 156 101 15 195.00
141 156 101 16 195.00
142 156 101 17 195.00
143 156 101 18 195.00
144 156 101 19 195.00
145 156 101 20 195.00
146 156 102 1 195.00
147 156 102 2 195.00

Page 3 of 5 ends

LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 - WATERMAN HIGHLANDS FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
148 156 102 3 195.00
149 156 102 4 195.00
150 156 102 5 195.00
151 156 102 6 195.00
152 156 102 7 195.00
153 156 102 8 195.00
154 156 102 9 195.00
155 156 102 10 195.00
156 156 102 11 195.00
157 156 102 13 195.00
158 156 102 14 195.00
159 156 102 15 195.00
160 156 102 17 195.00
161 156 102 18 195.00
162 156 102 19 195.00
163 156 102 20 195.00
164 156 102 21 195.00
165 156 102 22 195.00
166 156 102 23 195.00
167 156 102 24 195.00
168 156 102 25 195.00
169 156 102 26 195.00
170 156 102 31 195.00
171 156 102 32 195.00
172 156 102 33 195.00
173 156 102 38 195.00
174 156 102 39 195.00
175 156 102 40 195.00
176 156 102 41 195.00
177 156 102 42 195.00
178 156 102 43 195.00
179 156 102 44 195.00
180 156 102 45 195.00
181 156 102 46 195.00
182 156 111 2 195.00
183 156 112 2 195.00
184 156 112 3 195.00
185 156 112 4 195.00
186 156 112 5 195.00
187 156 112 6 195.00
188 156 112 7 195.00
189 156 112 8 195.00
190 156 113 8 195.00
191 156 113 11 195.00
192 156 113 12 195.00
193 156 113 13 195.00
194 156 113 14 195.00
195 156 113 15 195.00
196 156 113 16 195.00

Page 4 of 5 ends

LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 - WATERMAN HIGHLANDS FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
197 156 113 17 195.00
198 156 113 18 195.00
199 156 113 19 195.00
200 156 113 20 195.00
201 156 113 21 195.00
202 156 113 22 195.00
203 156 113 23 195.00
204 156 113 24 195.00
205 156 113 25 195.00
206 156 113 26 195.00
207 156 113 27 195.00
208 156 113 28 195.00
209 156 113 29 195.00
210 156 113 30 195.00
211 156 113 31 195.00
212 156 113 32 195.00
213 156 113 33 195.00
214 156 113 34 195.00
215 156 113 35 195.00
216 156 113 36 195.00
217 156 113 37 195.00
218 156 113 38 195.00
219 156 113 39 195.00
220 156 113 40 195.00
221 156 113 41 195.00
222 156 113 42 195.00
223 156 113 43 195.00
224 156 113 44 195.00
225 156 113 45 195.00
226 156 113 46 195.00
227 156 113 47 195.00
228 156 113 48 195.00
229 156 113 49 195.00
230 156 113 50 195.00
231 156 113 51 195.00
232 156 113 52 195.00
233 156 113 53 195.00
234 156 113 55 195.00
235 156 120 26 195.00
236 156 120 27 195.00
237 156 120 28 195.00
238 156 370 1 195.00
239 156 370 2 195.00
240 156 370 3 195.00
241 156 370 4 195.00
242 156 370 5 195.00
47,190.00

Page 5 of 5 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-82

GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 ENGINEER’S REPORT,

DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS, AND

PROVIDING NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 – SMITH RANCH

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1991, this City C ouncil adopted Resolution No. 91 -136, A Continuing Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment Districts; and

WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, staff informed the council that Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 – Smith Ranch (LLMD No. 5 or District), also known as Rancho Solano, was projected to have a budget deficit by fiscal year (FY) 2023 -2024 if the District continued to provide landscaping and lighting maintenance services at the existing levels; and

WHEREAS, during FY 2022 -2023, the City conducted a balloting process in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known as Proposition 218, to propose to property owners the forma tion of LLMD No. 2023 -5 (Rancho Solano), a new maintenance district with higher assessments that would adequately fund the services; and

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2023 , based upon the tabulation of the assessment ballots, the council determined that a majority protest, as defined in Section 53753 of the Government Code, was filed by the property owners in the proposed LLMD No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano); and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 22593 of the Streets and Highways Code, the council abandoned formation proceedings; and

WHEREAS, all landscaping and lighting maintenance services in the Rancho Solano community will continue to be funded by assessments levied under the existing LLMD No. 5.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. Pursuant to said resolution, the engineer designated therein prepared a report in accordance with Section 22565 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code for the District. Said report, on fi le in the office of the city clerk, as supplemented by the supplemental report for FY 2025-2026, ordered by the council and on file in the office of the city clerk, has been duly considered by this council and is hereby deemed sufficient and given prelimin ary approval.

Said report, as supplemented, shall constitute the engineer’s report for FY 2025-2026 (Engineer’s Report).

Page 109 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-82

Page 2 ends

Section 2. It is the intention of this council to levy and collect assessments within the District for FY 2025-2026. The improvements to be financed by the District are located in the street rights- of-way and perimeter areas within the boundaries of the District and may be briefly described as the installation, construction, maintenance, operation, and servicing of street lighting, which may include lighting fixtures, poles, meters, and electrical cables, landscaping, which may include turf, ground cover, trees, shrubs, plants, open space, weed abatement, ornamental lighting structures, irrigation, and drainage systems, trails, wetlands, parks, and appurtenant facilities.

The substantial changes to be made from t he previous fiscal year may include deferral, elimination, or decrease in the frequency of certain lighting and/or landscaping services and irrigation practices. Additionally, the District will cease funding the maintenance and servicing of lighting facili ties that do not meet the criteria described in Sections 22534 and 22535 of the Streets and Highways Code.

Section 3. Said District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the boundary map of the District on file with the city clerk in the City of Fairfield.

Section 4. The FY 2025-2026 assessment for the District is proposed to increase from the FY 2024-2025 rate of $723.79 per parcel to $740.43 per parcel. The assessment is the maximum rate allowable by the District’s adopted assessment range, wh ich was established in 1999 and is adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Consumer Price Index.

Section 5. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the city clerk, for a full a nd detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District , and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Any public property owned by any public agency or in use in the performance of a public function within the District may be assessed.

Section 6. This council hereby orders that a public hearing shall be held before this council in the regular meeting place thereof at the Council Chamber, Civic Center, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California, or in any other manner as specified on the regular meeting agenda, as follows:

The public hearing shall be held on July 1, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, for the purposes of this council’s determination whet her the public interest, convenience, and necessity require that the proposed levy be made, and this council’s final action upon the Engineer’s Report and the assessment therein. The agenda will be available on the City’s website, www.fairfield.ca.gov, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Page 110 of 745 ends

RES. NO. 2025-82

Page 3 ends

Section 7. The city clerk shall cause notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a copy of this resolution once in the Daily Republic, a newspaper published and circulated in the city , at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing specified in this resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

Page 111 of 745 ends

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 – SMITH RANCH

ENGINEER’S REPORT

FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

CONTENTS

1. Assessment

2. Method of Apportionment

3. Description of Work

4. Summary Statement of Influencing Factors for Maintenance District Budget

5. District Budget

6. Assessments for Each Parcel

Page 112 of 745 ends

1 ASSESSMENT

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1991, the City Council of the City of Fairfield, California (Council), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted Resolution No. 91-136, A Continuing Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Reports for Maintenance Assessment Districts; and

WHEREAS, said resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565 et seq. of said Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council, hereby makes the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto for the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 – Smith Ranch (District), also known as Rancho Solano.

The amount to be paid for the expenses is as shown in section 5 of this report.

Reference is made to the original assessment diagram for the D istrict dated December 1986, which is hereby amended by the assessment roll contained herein.

I do hereby assess the net amount upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within the District by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of the improvements.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the assessor's maps of the County of Solano for the fiscal year (FY) 2025- 2026 and includes all such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right of way. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the county recorder of said County.

Dated:_________________ ____________________________
Ryan Panganiban
City Engineer/Asst. Director of Public Works
R.C.E. No. 74795
Expires 12/31/25

Page 113 of 745 ends

2 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

The total assessment is apportioned on an equal basis to each of the assessable residential parcels within the District. Un-subdivided areas within the District will be assessed based on the acreage of the parcels within each un-subdivided area.

Page 114 of 745 ends

3 DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED WORK

The following is a brief description of the improvements that may be maintained contingent upon available budget and resources:

1. All street light facilities on Rancho Solano Parkway and other public lighting facilities.

2. Rancho Solano Parkway: All landscaping in the median island and in the parkway strips between the curb and the public right-of-way on Rancho Solano Parkway.

3. Behind the Gates : All landscaping in median islands, in parkway strips and on slopes shown to be landscaped behind the gates as a part of the Rancho Solano Landscaping Contracts Phases I-III.

4. All lands designated as open space within the district.

5. Any other necessary maintenance to sustain the integrity of the landscape and lighting improvements within the District.

Page 115 of 745 ends

4 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INFLUENCING FACTORS

FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET

The FY 2025-2026 assessment levy for the Smith Ranch district is proposed to increase from the FY 2024- 2025 rate of $723.79 per parcel to $740.43 per parcel. The assessment levy is the maximum rate allowable by the district’s adopted assessment range, whic h was established in 1999 and is adjusted each year by the October SF -Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers CPI.

Page 116 of 745 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FUND 171
FY 2025-2026 BUDGET PROJECTIONS
BUDGET
OBJECT FY23-24 ActualFY24-25 Actual*FY24-25 OriginalFY24-25 Proj FY25-26 Proj FY26-27 Proj FY27-28 Proj FY28-29 Proj FY29-30 Proj 7004 - SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS - - - - - - - - - 6106 - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 847,344 434,268 868,548 868,548 888,516 915,171 942,627 970,905 1,000,033 6401 - INT INC ON POOLED INVESTMENTS 7,608 1,698 1,900 1,900 3,227 2,919 2,614 2,325 2,051 7600 - TRANSFERS IN 119,878 23,582 35,373 35,373 35,373 35,373 35,373 35,373 35,373 7601 - TRANS IN GENERAL FUND 011 - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUE 974,830 459,548 905,821 905,821 927,116 953,463 980,614 1,008,603 1,037,457 City Staff Costs
8101 - SALARIES 41,492 24,941 50,984 50,984 39,688 40,604 41,822 43,077 44,369 8102 - AS NEEDED LABOR - - - - - - - - - 8103 - OVERTIME 1,391 523 - 523 - - - - - 8105 - LEAVE TIME 5,990 7,734 - 5,651 - - - - - 8107 - EMERGENCY PAID SICK LEAVE - - - - - - - - - 8108 - SUPPLEMENTAL SICK LEAVE - - - - - - - - - 8109 - EMERGENCY DUTY PAY (EOC) - - - - - - - - - 8111 - BUDGETED SALARY SAVINGS - - (2,572) (2,572) (2,001) (2,047) (2,109) (2,172) (2,237) 8201 - LEAVE PAYOFFS - - - - - - - - - 8207 - PERS CONTRIBUTIONS - - - - - - - - - 8209 - MEDICARE TAX 706 521 744 744 565 578 596 614 632 8210 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION 2,346 1,593 2,477 2,477 1,912 1,959 2,018 2,078 2,141 8211 - ICMA VANTAGECARE RETIREE HLTH 268 157 273 273 210 210 216 223 229 8212 - POB ER RATE 1,015 1,352 2,029 2,029 1,575 1,564 1,611 1,660 1,710 8213 - PARS CONTRIBUTIONS - - - - - - - - - 8216 - SOCIAL SECURITY (PT) - - - - - - - - - 8219 - UNIFORM/EQUIP/BOOT/AUTO 19 16 19 19 10 10 10 10 10 8220 - MEDICAL 10,828 7,019 12,378 12,378 9,289 9,845 10,140 10,444 10,758 8221 - DENTAL AND VISION 639 384 698 698 485 915 942 971 1,000 8231 - BUDGETED BENEFITS SAVINGS - - - - - - - - - 8235 - LIFE/DISABILITY INSURANCE 161 107 169 169 131 133 137 141 146 8238 - SPECIAL COMPENSATION 362 222 360 360 300 300 309 318 328 8240 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-CLASSIC 1,006 665 1,038 1,038 917 905 932 960 989 8241 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-PEPRA 4,500 2,947 4,602 4,602 3,325 3,317 3,416 3,519 3,624 8242 - PERS-MISCELLANEOUS-UNFUND LIAB 4,457 8,319 12,728 12,728 11,409 12,249 12,617 12,995 13,385 8814 - WC INSURANCE CHARGES 700 1,110 1,681 1,681 1,307 1,870 1,926 1,984 2,043 8830 - VACATION/SICK LEAVE CHARGES 1,060 2,827 4,363 4,363 3,401 3,382 3,483 3,588 3,696 Subtotal - City Staff Costs 76,937 60,437 91,971 98,145 72,523 75,794 78,067 80,409 82,822 Other Administration
8303 - PRINTING AND BINDING-OUTS SVC - - - - - - - - - 8305 - COMPUTER EXPENSE < $5000 - - - - - - - - - 8803 - PRINTING ISF CHGS - - - - - - - - - 8836 - COST ALLOCATION - - - - - - - - - 8911 - OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 2,723 680 - 680 - - - - - 9003 - ADVERTISING 405 351 500 500 515 530 546 563 580 9038 - COUNTY ADMIN EXPENSES 8,473 4,343 8,700 8,700 8,885 9,152 9,426 9,709 10,000 Subtotal - Other Administration 11,601 5,373 9,200 9,880 9,400 9,682 9,973 10,272 10,580 Operations
8334 - STREET LIGHTS 10,843 - 10,000 10,000 10,300 10,609 10,927 11,255 11,593 8404 - WEED ABATEMENT - - 10,000 10,000 10,300 10,609 10,927 11,255 11,593 8405 - LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE 586,888 339,406 625,275 575,643 575,472 592,736 610,518 628,834 647,699 8441 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - - - - 8702 - PG&E-ELECTRICITY 25,032 18,677 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,900 31,827 32,782 33,765 8704 - WATER SERVICES 64,479 80,405 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 9028 - OTHER EXPENSES 6,130 5,022 20,000 40,000 120,000 123,600 127,308 131,127 135,061 9505 - PJCT CST-CONSTRUCTION 1,050 - - - - - - - - Subtotal - Operations 694,422 443,510 825,275 795,643 876,072 898,454 921,508 945,253 969,711 TOTAL EXPENSE 782,961 509,321 926,446 903,668 957,995 983,930 1,009,548 1,035,934 1,063,112 NET SURPLUS/DEFICIT 191,869 (49,773) (20,625) 2,153 (30,879) (30,467) (28,934) (27,331) (25,655)

FUND BALANCE
Beginning Fund Balance 127,940 320,583 320,583 320,583 322,736 291,857 261,390 232,456 205,125 Net Surplus/Deficit 191,869 (49,773) (20,625) 2,153 (30,879) (30,467) (28,934) (27,331) (25,655) Mkt Val-Unrealized Gain/Loss 774 4,273 - - - - - - - ENDING FUND BALANCE 320,583 275,082 299,958 322,736 291,857 261,390 232,456 205,125 179,469 *As of 02/28/25

Page 117 of 745 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
1 151 301 1 740.43
2 151 301 2 740.43
3 151 301 3 740.43
4 151 301 4 740.43
5 151 301 5 740.43
6 151 301 6 740.43
7 151 301 7 740.43
8 151 301 8 740.43
9 151 301 9 740.43
10 151 301 10 740.43
11 151 301 11 740.43
12 151 301 13 740.43
13 151 301 14 740.43
14 151 301 15 740.43
15 151 301 16 740.43
16 151 301 17 740.43
17 151 301 18 740.43
18 151 301 19 740.43
19 151 301 20 740.43
20 151 301 21 740.43
21 151 301 22 740.43
22 151 301 23 740.43
23 151 302 2 740.43
24 151 302 3 740.43
25 151 302 4 740.43
26 151 302 5 740.43
27 151 302 6 740.43
28 151 302 7 740.43
29 151 302 8 740.43
30 151 302 9 740.43
31 151 302 10 740.43
32 151 302 11 740.43
33 151 302 12 740.43
34 151 302 13 740.43
35 151 302 14 740.43
36 151 302 15 740.43
37 151 302 16 740.43
38 151 302 17 740.43
39 151 302 18 740.43
40 151 302 19 740.43
41 151 302 20 740.43
42 151 303 1 740.43
43 151 303 2 740.43
44 151 303 3 740.43
45 151 303 4 740.43
46 151 303 5 740.43
47 151 303 6 740.43
48 151 303 7 740.43
49 151 312 1 740.43

Page 1 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
50 151 312 2 740.43
51 151 313 1 740.43
52 151 313 2 740.43
53 151 313 3 740.43
54 151 313 4 740.43
55 151 313 5 740.43
56 151 314 2 740.43
57 151 314 3 740.43
58 151 314 4 740.43
59 151 314 5 740.43
60 151 314 6 740.43
61 151 314 7 740.43
62 151 314 8 740.43
63 151 314 9 740.43
64 151 314 10 740.43
65 151 314 11 740.43
66 151 314 12 740.43
67 151 314 13 740.43
68 151 314 14 740.43
69 151 314 15 740.43
70 151 314 16 740.43
71 151 314 18 740.43
72 151 314 19 740.43
73 151 314 20 740.43
74 151 314 21 740.43
75 151 314 22 740.43
76 151 314 23 740.43
77 151 314 24 740.43
78 151 314 25 740.43
79 151 314 26 740.43
80 151 314 27 740.43
81 151 314 28 740.43
82 151 314 29 740.43
83 151 314 30 740.43
84 151 314 32 740.43
85 151 314 33 740.43
86 151 314 34 740.43
87 151 314 35 740.43
88 151 314 36 740.43
89 151 314 37 740.43
90 151 314 38 740.43
91 151 314 39 740.43
92 151 314 40 740.43
93 151 314 41 740.43
94 151 314 42 740.43
95 151 314 43 740.43
96 151 314 44 740.43
97 151 314 45 740.43
98 151 314 46 740.43

Page 2 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
99 151 314 47 740.43
100 151 314 48 740.43
101 151 314 49 740.43
102 151 314 50 740.43
103 151 314 51 740.43
104 151 314 52 740.43
105 151 314 53 740.43
106 151 314 54 740.43
107 151 314 55 740.43
108 151 321 2 740.43
109 151 321 3 740.43
110 151 321 4 740.43
111 151 322 1 740.43
112 151 322 2 740.43
113 151 322 3 740.43
114 151 322 4 740.43
115 151 322 5 740.43
116 151 322 6 740.43
117 151 322 7 740.43
118 151 322 8 740.43
119 151 323 2 740.43
120 151 323 3 740.43
121 151 323 4 740.43
122 151 323 5 740.43
123 151 323 6 740.43
124 151 323 7 740.43
125 151 323 8 740.43
126 151 323 9 740.43
127 151 323 10 740.43
128 151 324 1 740.43
129 151 324 2 740.43
130 151 324 3 740.43
131 151 324 4 740.43
132 151 324 5 740.43
133 151 324 6 740.43
134 151 324 7 740.43
135 151 324 8 740.43
136 151 324 9 740.43
137 151 324 10 740.43
138 151 325 1 740.43
139 151 325 2 740.43
140 151 325 3 740.43
141 151 325 4 740.43
142 151 325 5 740.43
143 151 325 6 740.43
144 151 325 7 740.43
145 151 325 8 740.43
146 151 325 9 740.43
147 151 331 2 740.43

Page 3 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
148 151 331 3 740.43
149 151 331 4 740.43
150 151 331 5 740.43
151 151 331 6 740.43
152 151 331 7 740.43
153 151 331 8 740.43
154 151 331 9 740.43
155 151 331 10 740.43
156 151 332 2 740.43
157 151 332 3 740.43
158 151 332 4 740.43
159 151 332 5 740.43
160 151 332 6 740.43
161 151 332 7 740.43
162 151 332 8 740.43
163 151 332 9 740.43
164 151 332 10 740.43
165 151 332 11 740.43
166 151 332 12 740.43
167 151 332 13 740.43
168 151 332 14 740.43
169 151 332 15 740.43
170 151 332 16 740.43
171 151 332 17 740.43
172 151 332 18 740.43
173 151 332 19 740.43
174 151 332 20 740.43
175 151 332 21 740.43
176 151 332 22 740.43
177 151 332 23 740.43
178 151 332 24 740.43
179 151 332 25 740.43
180 151 332 26 740.43
181 151 332 27 740.43
182 151 332 28 740.43
183 151 333 1 740.43
184 151 333 2 740.43
185 151 333 3 740.43
186 151 341 2 740.43
187 151 341 3 740.43
188 151 341 4 740.43
189 151 341 5 740.43
190 151 341 6 740.43
191 151 341 7 740.43
192 151 341 8 740.43
193 151 341 9 740.43
194 151 341 10 740.43
195 151 341 11 740.43
196 151 341 12 740.43

Page 4 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
197 151 341 13 740.43
198 151 341 14 740.43
199 151 341 15 740.43
200 151 341 16 740.43
201 151 341 17 740.43
202 151 341 18 740.43
203 151 341 19 740.43
204 151 341 20 740.43
205 151 341 21 740.43
206 151 341 22 740.43
207 151 341 23 740.43
208 151 341 24 740.43
209 151 351 1 740.43
210 151 351 2 740.43
211 151 353 2 740.43
212 151 353 3 740.43
213 151 353 4 740.43
214 151 353 5 740.43
215 151 353 6 740.43
216 151 354 1 740.43
217 151 354 2 740.43
218 151 354 3 740.43
219 151 355 1 740.43
220 151 355 2 740.43
221 151 355 3 740.43
222 151 355 4 740.43
223 151 355 5 740.43
224 151 355 6 740.43
225 151 355 7 740.43
226 151 355 8 740.43
227 151 355 9 740.43
228 151 355 10 740.43
229 151 355 11 740.43
230 151 355 12 740.43
231 151 355 13 740.43
232 151 381 1 740.43
233 151 381 2 740.43
234 151 381 3 740.43
235 151 381 4 740.43
236 151 381 5 740.43
237 151 382 1 740.43
238 151 382 2 740.43
239 151 382 3 740.43
240 151 382 4 740.43
241 151 382 5 740.43
242 151 382 6 740.43
243 151 382 7 740.43
244 151 382 8 740.43
245 151 382 9 740.43

Page 5 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
246 151 382 10 740.43
247 151 382 11 740.43
248 151 382 12 740.43
249 151 382 13 740.43
250 151 382 14 740.43
251 151 382 15 740.43
252 151 391 1 740.43
253 151 391 2 740.43
254 151 391 3 740.43
255 151 391 4 740.43
256 151 391 5 740.43
257 151 391 6 740.43
258 151 391 7 740.43
259 151 391 8 740.43
260 151 391 9 740.43
261 151 391 10 740.43
262 151 391 11 740.43
263 151 391 12 740.43
264 151 391 13 740.43
265 151 391 14 740.43
266 151 391 15 740.43
267 151 551 1 740.43
268 151 551 2 740.43
269 151 551 3 740.43
270 151 551 4 740.43
271 151 551 5 740.43
272 151 551 6 740.43
273 151 551 7 740.43
274 151 551 8 740.43
275 151 551 9 740.43
276 151 551 10 740.43
277 151 551 11 740.43
278 151 551 12 740.43
279 151 551 13 740.43
280 151 551 14 740.43
281 151 551 15 740.43
282 151 551 16 740.43
283 151 551 17 740.43
284 151 551 18 740.43
285 151 551 19 740.43
286 151 551 20 740.43
287 151 551 21 740.43
288 151 551 22 740.43
289 151 552 1 740.43
290 151 552 2 740.43
291 151 552 3 740.43
292 151 552 4 740.43
293 151 552 5 740.43
294 151 552 6 740.43

Page 6 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
295 151 552 7 740.43
296 151 552 8 740.43
297 151 552 9 740.43
298 151 552 10 740.43
299 151 552 11 740.43
300 151 552 12 740.43
301 151 552 13 740.43
302 151 552 14 740.43
303 151 552 15 740.43
304 151 552 16 740.43
305 151 552 17 740.43
306 151 552 18 740.43
307 151 552 19 740.43
308 151 552 20 740.43
309 151 552 21 740.43
310 151 552 22 740.43
311 151 552 23 740.43
312 151 552 24 740.43
313 151 553 1 740.43
314 151 553 2 740.43
315 151 553 3 740.43
316 151 553 4 740.43
317 151 553 5 740.43
318 151 553 6 740.43
319 151 554 1 740.43
320 151 554 2 740.43
321 151 554 3 740.43
322 151 554 4 740.43
323 151 554 5 740.43
324 151 554 6 740.43
325 151 554 7 740.43
326 151 554 8 740.43
327 151 555 1 740.43
328 151 555 2 740.43
329 151 555 3 740.43
330 151 555 4 740.43
331 151 561 1 740.43
332 151 562 1 740.43
333 151 562 2 740.43
334 151 562 3 740.43
335 151 562 4 740.43
336 151 562 5 740.43
337 151 562 6 740.43
338 151 562 7 740.43
339 151 562 8 740.43
340 151 562 9 740.43
341 151 562 10 740.43
342 151 562 11 740.43
343 151 562 12 740.43

Page 7 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
344 151 562 13 740.43
345 151 562 14 740.43
346 151 562 15 740.43
347 151 562 16 740.43
348 151 562 17 740.43
349 151 562 18 740.43
350 151 562 19 740.43
351 151 562 20 740.43
352 151 562 21 740.43
353 151 562 22 740.43
354 151 562 23 740.43
355 151 562 24 740.43
356 151 562 25 740.43
357 151 562 26 740.43
358 151 562 27 740.43
359 151 562 28 740.43
360 151 562 29 740.43
361 151 562 30 740.43
362 151 562 31 740.43
363 151 562 32 740.43
364 151 562 33 740.43
365 151 562 34 740.43
366 151 563 2 740.43
367 151 563 3 740.43
368 151 563 4 740.43
369 151 563 5 740.43
370 151 563 6 740.43
371 151 563 7 740.43
372 151 563 8 740.43
373 151 563 9 740.43
374 151 563 10 740.43
375 151 563 11 740.43
376 151 564 2 740.43
377 151 564 3 740.43
378 151 564 4 740.43
379 151 564 5 740.43
380 151 564 6 740.43
381 151 564 7 740.43
382 151 564 8 740.43
383 151 564 9 740.43
384 151 564 10 740.43
385 151 564 11 740.43
386 151 571 2 740.43
387 151 571 3 740.43
388 151 571 4 740.43
389 151 571 5 740.43
390 151 571 6 740.43
391 151 571 7 740.43
392 151 571 8 740.43

Page 8 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
393 151 571 9 740.43
394 151 571 10 740.43
395 151 571 11 740.43
396 151 571 12 740.43
397 151 571 13 740.43
398 151 571 14 740.43
399 151 571 15 740.43
400 151 572 2 740.43
401 151 572 3 740.43
402 151 572 4 740.43
403 151 572 5 740.43
404 151 572 6 740.43
405 151 572 7 740.43
406 151 572 8 740.43
407 151 581 2 740.43
408 151 581 3 740.43
409 151 581 4 740.43
410 151 581 5 740.43
411 151 581 6 740.43
412 151 581 7 740.43
413 151 581 8 740.43
414 151 581 9 740.43
415 151 582 2 740.43
416 151 582 3 740.43
417 151 582 4 740.43
418 151 582 5 740.43
419 151 582 6 740.43
420 151 582 7 740.43
421 151 582 8 740.43
422 151 582 9 740.43
423 151 583 1 740.43
424 151 583 2 740.43
425 151 583 3 740.43
426 151 591 1 740.43
427 151 591 2 740.43
428 151 591 3 740.43
429 151 591 4 740.43
430 151 591 5 740.43
431 151 591 6 740.43
432 151 591 7 740.43
433 151 591 8 740.43
434 151 591 9 740.43
435 151 591 10 740.43
436 151 591 11 740.43
437 151 591 12 740.43
438 151 591 13 740.43
439 151 591 14 740.43
440 151 591 15 740.43
441 151 592 1 740.43

Page 9 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
442 151 592 2 740.43
443 151 592 3 740.43
444 151 592 4 740.43
445 151 592 5 740.43
446 151 593 1 740.43
447 151 593 2 740.43
448 151 593 3 740.43
449 151 593 4 740.43
450 151 621 1 740.43
451 151 621 2 740.43
452 151 621 3 740.43
453 151 621 4 740.43
454 151 621 5 740.43
455 151 621 6 740.43
456 151 621 7 740.43
457 151 621 8 740.43
458 151 621 9 740.43
459 151 621 10 740.43
460 151 621 11 740.43
461 151 621 12 740.43
462 151 621 13 740.43
463 151 621 14 740.43
464 151 621 17 740.43
465 151 621 18 740.43
466 151 621 20 740.43
467 151 621 21 740.43
468 151 621 22 740.43
469 151 621 23 740.43
470 151 621 24 740.43
471 151 621 25 740.43
472 151 621 26 740.43
473 151 621 27 740.43
474 151 621 28 740.43
475 151 621 29 740.43
476 151 621 30 740.43
477 151 621 32 740.43
478 151 621 33 740.43
479 151 621 34 740.43
480 151 621 35 740.43
481 151 621 36 740.43
482 151 621 37 740.43
483 151 621 38 740.43
484 151 621 39 740.43
485 151 621 40 740.43
486 151 621 41 740.43
487 151 621 42 740.43
488 151 622 1 740.43
489 151 622 2 740.43
490 151 622 3 740.43

Page 10 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
491 151 622 4 740.43
492 151 622 5 740.43
493 151 622 6 740.43
494 151 622 7 740.43
495 151 622 8 740.43
496 151 622 9 740.43
497 151 622 10 740.43
498 151 622 11 740.43
499 151 622 12 740.43
500 151 622 13 740.43
501 151 622 14 740.43
502 151 631 3 740.43
503 151 631 4 740.43
504 151 631 5 740.43
505 151 631 6 740.43
506 151 631 7 740.43
507 151 631 8 740.43
508 151 631 9 740.43
509 151 631 10 740.43
510 151 631 11 740.43
511 151 631 12 740.43
512 151 631 13 740.43
513 151 631 14 740.43
514 151 632 1 740.43
515 151 632 2 740.43
516 151 632 3 740.43
517 151 632 4 740.43
518 151 632 5 740.43
519 151 632 6 740.43
520 151 632 7 740.43
521 151 632 8 740.43
522 151 632 9 740.43
523 151 632 10 740.43
524 151 632 11 740.43
525 151 633 1 740.43
526 151 633 2 740.43
527 151 633 3 740.43
528 151 633 4 740.43
529 151 633 5 740.43
530 151 633 6 740.43
531 151 633 7 740.43
532 151 633 8 740.43
533 151 633 9 740.43
534 151 633 10 740.43
535 151 633 11 740.43
536 151 633 12 740.43
537 151 633 13 740.43
538 151 633 14 740.43
539 151 633 15 740.43

Page 11 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
540 151 633 16 740.43
541 151 633 17 740.43
542 151 634 1 740.43
543 151 634 2 740.43
544 151 634 3 740.43
545 151 634 4 740.43
546 151 634 5 740.43
547 151 634 6 740.43
548 151 634 7 740.43
549 151 634 8 740.43
550 151 634 9 740.43
551 151 634 10 740.43
552 151 634 11 740.43
553 151 634 12 740.43
554 151 634 13 740.43
555 151 635 1 740.43
556 151 635 2 740.43
557 151 635 3 740.43
558 151 635 4 740.43
559 151 635 5 740.43
560 151 635 6 740.43
561 151 635 7 740.43
562 151 641 1 740.43
563 151 641 2 740.43
564 151 641 3 740.43
565 151 641 4 740.43
566 151 641 5 740.43
567 151 641 6 740.43
568 151 641 11 740.43
569 151 641 12 740.43
570 151 641 13 740.43
571 151 641 14 740.43
572 151 642 1 740.43
573 151 642 2 740.43
574 151 642 3 740.43
575 151 642 4 740.43
576 151 642 5 740.43
577 151 643 1 740.43
578 151 643 2 740.43
579 151 643 3 740.43
580 151 643 4 740.43
581 151 643 5 740.43
582 151 643 6 740.43
583 151 644 1 740.43
584 151 644 2 740.43
585 151 644 3 740.43
586 151 644 4 740.43
587 151 644 5 740.43
588 151 645 1 740.43

Page 12 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
589 151 645 2 740.43
590 151 645 3 740.43
591 151 645 4 740.43
592 151 645 5 740.43
593 151 645 6 740.43
594 151 652 3 740.43
595 151 652 4 740.43
596 151 652 5 740.43
597 151 652 6 740.43
598 151 652 7 740.43
599 151 652 8 740.43
600 151 652 9 740.43
601 151 652 10 740.43
602 151 652 11 740.43
603 151 652 12 740.43
604 151 653 2 740.43
605 151 653 3 740.43
606 151 653 4 740.43
607 151 653 5 740.43
608 151 653 6 740.43
609 151 653 7 740.43
610 151 653 8 740.43
611 151 653 9 740.43
612 151 653 10 740.43
613 151 653 11 740.43
614 151 653 12 740.43
615 151 654 3 740.43
616 151 654 4 740.43
617 151 654 5 740.43
618 151 654 6 740.43
619 151 654 7 740.43
620 151 654 8 740.43
621 151 654 9 740.43
622 151 654 11 740.43
623 151 654 16 740.43
624 151 654 18 740.43
625 151 692 1 740.43
626 151 692 2 740.43
627 151 692 3 740.43
628 151 692 4 740.43
629 151 692 5 740.43
630 151 692 6 740.43
631 151 692 7 740.43
632 151 692 8 740.43
633 151 692 9 740.43
634 151 692 10 740.43
635 151 692 11 740.43
636 151 692 12 740.43
637 151 702 1 740.43

Page 13 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
638 151 702 2 740.43
639 151 702 3 740.43
640 151 702 4 740.43
641 151 702 5 740.43
642 151 702 6 740.43
643 151 702 7 740.43
644 151 702 8 740.43
645 151 702 9 740.43
646 151 702 10 740.43
647 151 702 11 740.43
648 151 702 12 740.43
649 151 702 13 740.43
650 151 702 14 740.43
651 151 702 15 740.43
652 151 702 16 740.43
653 151 702 17 740.43
654 151 702 18 740.43
655 151 702 19 740.43
656 151 702 20 740.43
657 151 702 21 740.43
658 151 702 22 740.43
659 151 711 1 740.43
660 151 711 2 740.43
661 151 711 3 740.43
662 151 711 4 740.43
663 151 711 5 740.43
664 151 711 6 740.43
665 151 711 7 740.43
666 151 711 8 740.43
667 151 711 9 740.43
668 151 711 10 740.43
669 151 711 11 740.43
670 151 711 12 740.43
671 151 711 13 740.43
672 151 711 14 740.43
673 151 711 15 740.43
674 151 711 16 740.43
675 151 711 17 740.43
676 151 711 18 740.43
677 151 711 19 740.43
678 151 711 20 740.43
679 151 711 21 740.43
680 151 711 22 740.43
681 151 711 23 740.43
682 151 711 24 740.43
683 151 712 2 740.43
684 151 712 3 740.43
685 151 712 4 740.43
686 151 712 5 740.43

Page 14 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
687 151 712 6 740.43
688 151 712 7 740.43
689 151 712 8 740.43
690 151 721 1 740.43
691 151 721 2 740.43
692 151 721 3 740.43
693 151 721 4 740.43
694 151 721 5 740.43
695 151 722 1 740.43
696 151 722 2 740.43
697 151 722 3 740.43
698 151 722 4 740.43
699 151 722 5 740.43
700 151 722 6 740.43
701 151 722 7 740.43
702 151 723 1 740.43
703 151 723 2 740.43
704 151 723 3 740.43
705 151 723 4 740.43
706 151 723 5 740.43
707 151 723 6 740.43
708 151 723 7 740.43
709 151 723 8 740.43
710 151 723 10 740.43
711 151 723 11 740.43
712 151 723 12 740.43
713 151 723 13 740.43
714 151 723 14 740.43
715 151 723 15 740.43
716 151 723 16 740.43
717 151 731 1 740.43
718 151 731 2 740.43
719 151 731 3 740.43
720 151 731 4 740.43
721 151 731 5 740.43
722 151 731 6 740.43
723 151 731 7 740.43
724 151 731 8 740.43
725 151 731 9 740.43
726 151 731 10 740.43
727 151 731 12 740.43
728 151 731 13 740.43
729 151 731 14 740.43
730 151 731 15 740.43
731 151 731 16 740.43
732 151 731 17 740.43
733 151 731 18 740.43
734 151 731 19 740.43
735 151 731 20 740.43

Page 15 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
736 151 731 21 740.43
737 151 731 22 740.43
738 151 731 23 740.43
739 151 731 24 740.43
740 151 732 1 740.43
741 151 732 2 740.43
742 151 732 3 740.43
743 151 732 4 740.43
744 151 732 5 740.43
745 151 732 6 740.43
746 151 732 7 740.43
747 151 732 8 740.43
748 151 732 9 740.43
749 151 732 10 740.43
750 151 732 11 740.43
751 151 732 12 740.43
752 151 732 13 740.43
753 151 732 14 740.43
754 151 733 1 740.43
755 151 733 2 740.43
756 151 733 3 740.43
757 151 733 4 740.43
758 151 733 5 740.43
759 151 733 6 740.43
760 151 733 7 740.43
761 151 742 1 740.43
762 151 742 2 740.43
763 151 742 3 740.43
764 151 742 4 740.43
765 151 742 5 740.43
766 151 742 6 740.43
767 151 742 7 740.43
768 151 742 8 740.43
769 151 742 9 740.43
770 151 743 1 740.43
771 151 743 2 740.43
772 151 743 3 740.43
773 151 743 4 740.43
774 151 743 5 740.43
775 151 743 6 740.43
776 151 743 7 740.43
777 151 743 8 740.43
778 151 743 9 740.43
779 151 743 10 740.43
780 151 743 11 740.43
781 151 743 12 740.43
782 151 751 2 740.43
783 151 751 3 740.43
784 151 751 4 740.43

Page 16 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
785 151 751 5 740.43
786 151 751 6 740.43
787 151 751 7 740.43
788 151 751 8 740.43
789 151 751 9 740.43
790 151 752 2 740.43
791 151 752 3 740.43
792 151 752 4 740.43
793 151 760 4 740.43
794 151 760 5 740.43
795 151 760 6 740.43
796 151 760 7 740.43
797 151 760 8 740.43
798 151 760 9 740.43
799 151 760 10 740.43
800 151 760 12 740.43
801 151 760 13 740.43
802 151 760 14 740.43
803 151 760 15 740.43
804 151 760 16 740.43
805 151 760 17 740.43
806 151 770 2 740.43
807 151 770 3 740.43
808 151 770 4 740.43
809 151 770 5 740.43
810 151 770 6 740.43
811 151 770 7 740.43
812 151 770 8 740.43
813 151 770 9 740.43
814 151 770 10 740.43
815 151 770 11 740.43
816 151 770 12 740.43
817 151 770 13 740.43
818 151 770 14 740.43
819 151 770 18 740.43
820 151 770 19 740.43
821 151 770 20 740.43
822 151 770 21 740.43
823 151 770 22 740.43
824 151 770 23 740.43
825 151 770 24 740.43
826 151 770 25 740.43
827 151 770 27 740.43
828 151 770 28 740.43
829 151 770 29 740.43
830 151 770 30 740.43
831 151 780 2 740.43
832 151 780 3 740.43
833 151 780 4 740.43

Page 17 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
834 151 780 5 740.43
835 151 780 6 740.43
836 151 780 7 740.43
837 151 780 8 740.43
838 151 780 9 740.43
839 151 780 10 740.43
840 151 780 11 740.43
841 151 780 12 740.43
842 151 780 13 740.43
843 151 780 14 740.43
844 151 780 15 740.43
845 151 780 16 740.43
846 151 780 19 740.43
847 151 780 20 740.43
848 151 790 1 740.43
849 151 790 2 740.43
850 151 790 3 740.43
851 151 790 4 740.43
852 151 790 5 740.43
853 151 790 6 740.43
854 151 790 7 740.43
855 151 790 8 740.43
856 151 790 9 740.43
857 151 790 11 740.43
858 151 790 12 740.43
859 151 790 13 740.43
860 151 790 14 740.43
861 151 790 15 740.43
862 151 790 16 740.43
863 151 790 17 740.43
864 151 790 18 740.43
865 151 790 19 740.43
866 151 790 20 740.43
867 151 790 23 740.43
868 151 790 24 740.43
869 151 790 25 740.43
870 151 790 26 740.43
871 151 790 27 740.43
872 151 790 28 740.43
873 151 790 29 740.43
874 151 790 30 740.43
875 151 790 31 740.43
876 151 790 32 740.43
877 151 790 39 740.43
878 151 790 40 740.43
879 151 790 41 740.43
880 151 790 42 740.43
881 151 790 43 740.43
882 151 790 44 740.43

Page 18 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
883 151 790 45 740.43
884 151 790 46 740.43
885 151 790 47 740.43
886 151 790 48 740.43
887 151 800 1 740.43
888 151 800 2 740.43
889 151 800 3 740.43
890 151 800 4 740.43
891 151 800 5 740.43
892 151 800 6 740.43
893 151 800 7 740.43
894 151 800 8 740.43
895 151 800 9 740.43
896 151 800 10 740.43
897 151 800 11 740.43
898 151 800 12 740.43
899 151 800 16 740.43
900 151 800 17 740.43
901 151 800 18 740.43
902 151 800 19 740.43
903 151 800 20 740.43
904 151 800 21 740.43
905 151 800 22 740.43
906 151 800 23 740.43
907 151 800 24 740.43
908 151 800 25 740.43
909 151 800 26 740.43
910 151 800 27 740.43
911 151 800 28 740.43
912 151 800 29 740.43
913 151 800 30 740.43
914 151 800 31 740.43
915 151 870 1 740.43
916 151 870 3 740.43
917 151 870 4 740.43
918 151 870 5 740.43
919 151 890 2 740.43
920 151 890 3 740.43
921 151 890 4 740.43
922 151 890 5 740.43
923 151 890 6 740.43
924 151 890 7 740.43
925 151 890 8 740.43
926 151 890 9 740.43
927 151 890 10 740.43
928 151 890 11 740.43
929 151 890 12 740.43
930 151 890 13 740.43
931 151 890 14 740.43

Page 19 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
932 151 890 15 740.43
933 151 890 16 740.43
934 151 890 17 740.43
935 151 890 18 740.43
936 151 890 19 740.43
937 151 890 20 740.43
938 151 890 21 740.43
939 151 890 22 740.43
940 151 900 1 740.43
941 151 900 2 740.43
942 151 900 3 740.43
943 151 900 4 740.43
944 151 900 5 740.43
945 151 900 6 740.43
946 151 900 7 740.43
947 151 900 8 740.43
948 151 900 9 740.43
949 151 900 10 740.43
950 151 900 11 740.43
951 151 900 12 740.43
952 151 900 13 740.43
953 151 900 14 740.43
954 151 900 15 740.43
955 151 900 16 740.43
956 151 900 17 740.43
957 151 900 18 740.43
958 151 921 2 740.43
959 151 921 3 740.43
960 151 921 4 740.43
961 151 921 5 740.43
962 151 921 6 740.43
963 151 921 7 740.43
964 151 921 8 740.43
965 151 921 9 740.43
966 151 921 10 740.43
967 151 921 11 740.43
968 151 922 1 740.43
969 151 922 2 740.43
970 151 922 3 740.43
971 151 922 4 740.43
972 151 922 5 740.43
973 151 922 6 740.43
974 151 922 7 740.43
975 151 922 8 740.43
976 151 922 9 740.43
977 151 922 10 740.43
978 151 923 1 740.43
979 151 923 2 740.43
980 151 923 4 740.43

Page 20 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
981 151 923 5 740.43
982 151 923 6 740.43
983 151 923 7 740.43
984 151 930 1 740.43
985 151 930 2 740.43
986 151 930 3 740.43
987 151 930 4 740.43
988 151 930 6 740.43
989 151 930 7 740.43
990 151 930 8 740.43
991 151 930 9 740.43
992 151 930 10 740.43
993 151 930 11 740.43
994 151 930 12 740.43
995 151 930 13 740.43
996 151 930 14 740.43
997 151 930 15 740.43
998 151 930 16 740.43
999 151 930 17 740.43
1000 151 930 18 740.43
1001 151 930 19 740.43
1002 151 930 20 740.43
1003 151 930 21 740.43
1004 151 930 22 740.43
1005 151 930 23 740.43
1006 151 930 24 740.43
1007 151 930 26 740.43
1008 151 930 27 740.43
1009 151 930 28 740.43
1010 151 930 29 740.43
1011 151 930 30 740.43
1012 151 930 31 740.43
1013 151 930 32 740.43
1014 151 930 33 740.43
1015 151 930 34 740.43
1016 151 930 35 740.43
1017 151 930 36 740.43
1018 151 930 37 740.43
1019 151 930 38 740.43
1020 151 941 1 740.43
1021 151 941 2 740.43
1022 151 941 3 740.43
1023 151 941 4 740.43
1024 151 941 5 740.43
1025 151 941 6 740.43
1026 151 941 7 740.43
1027 151 941 8 740.43
1028 151 941 9 740.43
1029 151 941 10 740.43

Page 21 of 25 ends

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 - SMITH RANCH FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY AMOUNT
1030 151 941 11 740.43
1031 151 941 12 740.43
1032 151 941 13 740.43
1033 151 941 14 740.43
1034 151 941 15 740.43
1035 151 941 16 740.43
1036 151 941 17 740.43
1037 151 941 18 740.43
1038 151 941 19 740.43
1039 151 941 20 740.43
1040 151 941 21 740.43
1041 151 941 22 740.43
1042 151 941 23 740.43
1043 151 941 24 740.43
1044 151 942 1 740.43
1045 151 942 2 740.43
1046 151 942 3 740.43
1047 151 942 4 740.43
1048 151 942 5 740.43
1049 151 942 6 740.43
1050 151 942 7 740.43
1051 151 942 8 740.43
1052 151 942 9 740.43
1053 151 943 1 740.43
1054 151 943 2 740.43
1055 151 951 1 740.43
1056 151 951 2 740.43
1057 151 951 3 740.43
1058 151 951 4 740.43
1059 151 951 5 740.43
1060 151 951 7 740.43
1061 151 951 8 740.43
1062 151 951 9 740.43
1063 151 951 10 740.43
1064 151 951 11 740.43
1065 151 951 12 740.43
1066 151 951 13 740.43
1067 151 951 14 740.43
1068 151 951 15 740.43
1069 151 951 16 740.43
1070 151 951 17 740.43
1071 151 952 1 740.43
1072 151 952 2 740.43
1073 151 952 3 740.43
1074 151 952 4 740.43
1075 151 952 5 740.43
1076 151 952 6 740.43
1077 151 952 7 740.43
1078 151 952 8 740.43

Page 22 of 25 ends
← All documents from this meeting