Agenda packet — Fairfield City Council, September 16, 2025 (part 7 of 9)

WETLAND TO BE REMOVED

PER PORTLAND DRIVE
CONNECTION PERMIT.

SEE PORTLAND PLANS FOR
MITIGATION MEASURES.

AIR BAS
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
UNIO
N

P
A
C
I
F
I
C
RAILR
O
A
D
PO
R
T
L
A
N
D

D
R
I
V
E
CO
U
R
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
G
O
L
D
E
N

W
A
Y
ST
R
E
E
T

'
B
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
C
'

STREET 'D'

H IGH LINE DRIVE
23 22
19 16
17 18
21 20 66
74 73
71 15
5 9
13 42
38 34
30 2
6 10
14 41
37 33
29 3
7 11
40 36
32 44
4 8
12 43
39 35
31 49
57 50
58 51
59 52
60 45
53 46
54 47
55 48
56 64
65 28
26 68 70
72 67 69
63 62
61 1
24 25
27 75
32 38
39 37
36 40
26 27
29 20
14 15
16 24
25 17
18 19
21 22
23 30
35 34
31 33
28 74
12 13
10 9
7 6
5 4
3 11
2 1
8 47
61 46
62 45
63 48
75 76
56 58 57
52 72
73 41
53 54
50 49
51 44
43 42
55 66
65 64
59 67
69 68
71 70
60 HOUSING SUMMARY
PLAN 1
PLAN 2
PLAN 3
UNIT COUNT HOUSE SIZE (SQ. FT.)
25 24
26 1,667
1,763
1,883
* HOUSE PLAN MIX IS APPROXIMATE, AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

LOT 1

UNIT COUNT
26 25
25 76
1,825
2,058
2,344
45'x68'
LOT 2
PLAN 1
PLAN 2
PLAN 3
SUBTOTAL 75 -

PARKING SPACE TYPE
STREET

DRIVEWAY
GARAGE
UNITSPACE/NO. OFSPACES

0.749

2.0150

2.0150
SUBTOTAL 4.7 SPACES/UNIT349

PARKING SPACE TYPE
LOT 2
STREET

DRIVEWAY
GARAGE
UNITSPACE/NO. OFSPACES

1.185

2.0152

2.0152
SUBTOTAL 5.1 SPACES/UNIT389
LOT 2
(76) 45'x68'(TYP.) LOTS

9.68± AC.(G)

8.68± AC (N)
LOT 1
(75) 33.25'x81.5'

8.03± AC.(G)

7.51 AC (N)
LOT 3
(224) CONDOMINIUM UNITS

14.18 AC.(G)
(TYP.) LOTS

PARKING PLAN AND HOUSING SUMMARY

SUBTOTAL

PARKING SUMMARY
738TOTAL 4.9 SPACES/ UNIT

33.25'x81.5'
LOT 1
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED:

PERCENT MIX*
33%
32%
35%
PERCENT MIX*
33%
33%
33%
100%
100%
HOUSE SIZE (SQ. FT.)
BUILDING AREA (SQ. FT./AC.)
41,675/0.96
42,312/0.97
48,958/1.12
47,450/1.09
51,450/1.18
58,625/1.35
157,525/3.62
132,945/3.05
BUILDING AREA (SQ. FT./AC.)
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826240
120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
NORTH

LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.

VILLAGE I

VILLAGE III

VILLAGE II

VILLAGE IV

LAGO VISTA
FEBRUARY 4 , 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
REVISED: JUNE 16, 2025

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588
SHEET 4 OF 11

Page 780 of 1141 ends

PUBLIC STREET
8' P.U.E.
8'

P
.

U
.

E
.
5' SIDEWALK
55'45'
68 '
68 '
55'
5'

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
PU
B
L
I
C

S
T
R
E
E
T

PUBLIC STREET
8' P.U.E.
5' SIDEWALK
40'33.25'
81 .
5 '
81 .
5 '
81 .
5 '
40'
5'

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
PU
B
L
I
C

S
T
R
E
E
T

33.25'x81.5' LOT (TYP.) PLOT PLANS 45'x68' LOT (TYP.) PLOT PLANS LOT 1 LOT 2
PLAN 1PLAN 1
PLAN 2PLAN 2
PLAN 3 PLAN 3
PLAN 1PLAN 1
PLAN 2 PLAN 2
PLAN 3PLAN 3
PL PL
68 '
45'

PUBLIC STREET
8' P.U.E.
8'

P
.

U
.

E
.
5' SIDEWALK
55'45'
68 '
68 '
55'
5'

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
PU
B
L
I
C

S
T
R
E
E
T
PL PL
68 '
45'

PUBLIC STREET
8' P.U.E.
8'

P
.

U
.

E
.
5' SIDEWALK
55'45'
68 '
68 '
55'
5'

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
PU
B
L
I
C

S
T
R
E
E
T
PL PL
68 '
45'
8'

P
.

U
.

E
.

PLPL

33.25'

PUBLIC STREET
5' SIDEWALK
40'33.25'
81 .
5 '
81 .
5 '
81 .
5 '
40'
5'

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
PU
B
L
I
C

S
T
R
E
E
T
PLPL

33.25'

PUBLIC STREET
5' SIDEWALK
40'33.25'
81 .
5 '
81 .
5 '
81 .
5 '
40'
5'

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
PU
B
L
I
C

S
T
R
E
E
T
PLPL

33.25'
8' P.U.E.
8' P.U.E.
8'

P
.

U
.

E
.
8'

P
.

U
.

E
.
2nd FLOOR(TYP)
2nd FLOOR(TYP)
2nd FLOOR(TYP)
N.T.S.N.T.S.

PR
I
V
A
T
E

S
T
R
E
E
T
BUILDING SETBACKLINE (TYP.)
BUILDING SETBACKLINE (TYP.)
BUILDING SETBACKLINE (TYP.)
BUILDING SETBACKLINE (TYP.)
BUILDING SETBACKLINE (TYP.)
BUILDING SETBACKLINE (TYP.)
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826

LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.

VILLAGE I

VILLAGE III

VILLAGE II

VILLAGE IV

LAGO VISTA
FEBRUARY 4 , 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
REVISED: JUNE 16, 2025

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588

FRONT SETBACK

SIDE SETBACK
INTERIOR - 3.5' MINUMUM
STREET SIDE - 10' MINIMUM

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PORCH - 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK-OF-WALK
1ST FLOOR LIVING AREA - 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK-OF-WALK
2ND FLOOR LIVING AREA - 10' MINIMUM TO FROM BACK-OF-WALK STREET SIDE AT CURB RETURN - 10' MINIMUM
GARAGE - 18' MINIMUM TO FROM BACK-OF-WALK

REAR SETBACK
7' MINIMUM

LOT COVERAGE
55% MAXIMUM
LOT 1 (RLM DISTRICT)

OPEN SPACE
340 S.F. (SIDE AND REAR YARD, 7' MINIMUM DIMENSION)

LANDSCAPING

STREET TREES - PER PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN

FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER
COMMON OPEN SPACE - 5% OF NET PROJECT AREA

FRONT SETBACK

SIDE SETBACK
INTERIOR - 4' MINIMUM
STREET SIDE - 10' MINIMUM

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PORCH - 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK-OF-WALK
1ST FLOOR LIVING AREA - 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK-OF-WALK
2ND FLOOR LIVING AREA - 10' MINIMUM TO FROM BACK-OF-WALK STREET SIDE AT CURB RETURN - 8' MINIMUM
GARAGE - 18' MINIMUM TO FROM BACK-OF-WALK

REAR SETBACK
1ST AND 2ND FLOORS - 10' MINIMUM

LOT COVERAGE
55% MAXIMUM
LOT 2 (RLM DISTRICT)

OPEN SPACE
450 S.F. (REAR YARD, 7' MIN. DIMENSION, INCLUDES CALIFORNIA ROOM)

LANDSCAPING

STREET TREES - PER PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN

FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER
COMMON OPEN SPACE - 5% OF NET PROJECT AREA
CALIFORNIA ROOM - 5' MINIMUM

TYPICAL PLOT PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SHEET 5 OF 11

Page 781 of 1141 ends

LOT C
LOT E
LOT B
LOT GWATER QUALITY BASINTOP 41.0BOTTOM 38.5

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
CMP RISER 39.5
FL 38.0

SPILLWAY
CO
U
R
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
G
O
L
D
E
N

W
A
Y
ST
R
E
E
T

'
B
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
C
'
B
-
C
-
D
-
C
-
E
-
G
-
H
-
I
-
J
-
K
-
L
-
LOT D
HIGH
L
I
N
E

D
R
I
V
E
P 50.4 P 50.4
P 54.3
P 54.0
P 53.6
P 53.2
P 52.7
P 52.3
P 51.9
P 51.5 P 50.9
P 51.4
P 52.0
P 52.6
P 53.2
P 53.7
P 54.3
P 54.7 P 54.4
P 54.2
P 53.7
P 53.1
P 52.5
P 51.9
P 51.3
P 50.8
65 64
62 61
63 76
74 73
72 71
70 69
68 75
66 67
55 57
56 51
53 54
52 60
5958
7 6
5 12
11 10
9 15
14 8
16 4
3 2
13 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
1 75
74 73
72 71
70 69 68
67 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
43 42
41 40
39 38
37 36
35 34
33 32
31 30
44 18
19 20
21 22
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 66
65 64
63 62
61 60
59 58
57 56
55 54
53 52
51 50
49 48
47 46
45 P 50.3
P 53.3
P 50.2
P 50.5
P 53.3
P 50.2
P 53.1
P 49.5
P 53.8
P 51.0
P 51.5
P 50.3
P 49.2
P 49.9
P 50.3
P 52.3
P 50.1
P 50.3
P 54.9
P 48.4
P 50.3
P 50.2
P 55.4
P 53.5
P 53.7
P 50.1
P 53.3
P 53.9
P 49.6
P 49.8
P 49.5
P 49.3
P 55.6
P 53.0
P 49.9
P 51.8
P 53.2
P 48.6
P 48.7
P 55.7
P 52.6
P 53.2
P 50.5
P 49.7
P 52.8
P 50.2
P 55.9
P 48.4
P 54.7
P 55.2
P 53.3
P 49.5
P 52.4
P 54.2
P 50.4
P 50.7
P 56.1
P 52.9
P 48.2
P 53.5
P 49.3
P 54.1
P 54.5
P 52.0
P 50.1
P 49.8
P 53.6
P 52.4
P 48.0
P 53.7
P 51.3
P 51.7
P 49.0
P 50.3
P 54.1
P 50.1
P 56.2
P 52.8
P 48.2
P 53.8
P 48.6
P 50.1
P 48.8
P 54.3
P 49.6
P 50.4
P 49.9
P 53.8
P 54.0
P 48.6
P 52.1
P 51.3
P 50.4 P 49.8
P 50.0
P 50.3
P 56.3
P 53.1
P 54.0
P 50.3
P 51.4
P 48.4
P 50.1
P 50.0
P 50.4
P 51.6
P 54.0
P 55.8
P 53.8
P 51.6
P 48.2
P 50.3
P 50.2
P 51.6
P 49.4
P 50.1
P 56.3
P 53.6
P 51.8
P 50.5
P 50.3
P 53.7
P 50.3
P 49.4
P 53.5
P 55.0
P 54.0
P 53.1
P 56.1
P 52.1
P 48.0
P 52.3
P 49.9
P 53.8
P 52.3
P 48.2
P 52.0
P 51.6
P 56.0
P 52.5
P 48.4
P 53.6
P 52.4
P 50.8
P 48.6
P 52.7
P 53.5
P 53.1
P 50.0
P 48.8
P 52.8
M
-
N
-
M
-
CONNECT TO EX 8"W

PER CITY OF FAIRFIELD

STANDARDS
CONNECT TO EX 8"SS

PER CITY OF FAIRFIELD

STANDARDS
CONNECT TO EX 12"W

PER CITY OF FAIRFIELD

STANDARDS
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
LOT G
LOT A
EVA
CMP RISER 39.5
0 -

STREET 'D'
32 38
39 37
36 40
30 35
34 31
33 74
47 61
46 62
45 63
48 75
76 56
58 57
52 72 73
41 53 54
50 49
51 44
43 42
55 66
65 64
59 67
69 68
71 70
60 P 49.1
D
-LOT F
F
-
P
-
D
-
A
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
SHEET 6 OF 119216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826240 120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
NORTH
FEBRUARY 4 , 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
REVISED: JUNE 16, 2025

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588

PRELIMINARY GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN

SANITARY SEWER LINE

WATERMAIN

STORM DRAIN

DRAIN MANHOLE

DRAIN INLET

SEWER MANHOLE

LOT BOUNDARY
8"W
LEGEND

RETAINING WALL
SLOPE

OUTFALL TO

EXISTING BASIN

E SECTION

SECTIONA B CSECTION SECTION

F SECTIONDSECTION

H SECTION J SECTIONGSECTIONISECTION

L SECTION N SECTIONKSECTIONMSECTION
(BY OTHERS)
LOT 3

TENTATIVE MAP FORCONDOMINUM PURPOSES

O SECTION

P SECTION

Page 782 of 1141 ends

AIR BAS
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
UNIO
N

P
A
C
I
F
I
C
RAILR
O
A
D
PO
R
T
L
A
N
D

D
R
I
V
E

NO ACCESS RIGHTS
CO
U
R
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
G
O
L
D
E
N

W
A
Y
ST
R
E
E
T

'
B
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
C
'

STREET 'D'

H IGH L INE DRIVE
LOT E
LOT B

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

SPILLWAY
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
LOT A
LOT D
LOT C
LOT F
LOT H

WATER QUALITY BASIN
E.V.A.

W/ KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARDS

KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARD

KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARD
LOT G

TREES BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
ACER BUERGERIANUM 24"BOX

TRIDENT MAPLE
CELTIS SINENSIS 24"BOX

CHINESE HACKBERRY
CERCIS CANADENSIS 24"BOX

EASTERN REDBUD
PINUS CANARIENSIS 24"BOX

CANARY ISLAND PINE
PINUS ELDARICA 24"BOX

AFGHAN PINE
PISTACIA CHINENSIS `KEITH DAVEY` 24"BOX

KEITH DAVEY CHINESE PISTACHE
QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA 24"BOX

COAST LIVE OAK
QUERCUS RUBRA 24"BOX

RED OAK
ZELKOVA SERRATA `VILLAGE GREEN` 24"BOX

SAWLEAF ZELKOVA

PLANT SCHEDULE

PARK PEDESTRIAN / DRIVEWAY

PAVING - CONCRETE
TRAIL

EXISTING WETLANDS/ OPEN SPACE

BACK YARD

FRONT YARD

WATER QUALITY BASIN

PLAYGROUND

LANDSCAPE/ OPEN SPACE LOTS

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION

CONCEPT LEGEND
SHEET 7 OF 9

OVERALL PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
LOT 2
(75) 45'x68'(TYP.) LOTS

9.8± AC.(G)

8.6± AC (N)

1.WITH EXCEPTION OF TURF AREAS AT PARK LOCATIONS, ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILLUTILIZE LOW AND/OR MEDIUM WATER USE PLANT MATERIAL.

2.ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A 3" LAYER OF BARK MULCH.

3.IRRIGATION DESIGN SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF FAIRFIELD WATER EFFICIENTLANDSCAPING (CHAPTER 22A). ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION INCLUDING WATERCALCULATIONS AND CERTIFICATES SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPECONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

4.IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL CONSIST OF LOW FLOW ROTARY SPRAY NOZZLE TECHNOLOGY,POINT SOURCE BUBBLERS AND/OR DRIP EMITTERS SYSTEM CONTROLLED BY ANAUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLER USING ET DATA SCHEDULING AND RAIN SENSORSHUT-OFF CAPABILITIES.

LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES

POCKET PARK SEE

ENLARGEMENT-A

PASSIVE PARK SEE
ENLARGEMENTS B1
AND B2

ANIMAL SCULPTURE

SHADE STRUCTURE WITH

TABLE AND BBQ

PLAY STRUCTURE

SYNTHETIC
TURF

SEATING AREA WITH BENCH

EXISTING

LANDSCAPE

PLANTING

GOLDEN WAY

SYNTHETIC

TURF AREA

SYNTHETIC

TURF AREA

SHRUB AREA
ROSES

BENCH & TRASH

PICNIC AREA W/

TABLES, BBQ, TRASH

AND SHADE CANOPY

ANIMAL SCULPTURE

TURF AREA

ENHANCEDENTRYLANDSCAPE
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
240
120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
NORTH
FEBRUARY 4, 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588

SHRUB AREA

SHRUB AREA
LOT 1
(75)33.25'x81.5'

8.1± AC.(G)

7.7± AC (N)
(TYP.) LOTS

SHRUB AREA

SHRUB AREA
ROSES
LOT 3TENTATIVE MAP FORCONDOMINIUMPURPOSES(BY OTHERS)
15'-18'

TRAIL/EVA

Page 783 of 1141 ends

AIR BAS
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
UNIO
N

P
A
C
I
F
I
C
RAILR
O
A
D
PO
R
T
L
A
N
D

D
R
I
V
E

NO ACCESS RIGHTS
CO
U
R
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
G
O
L
D
E
N

W
A
Y
ST
R
E
E
T

'
B
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
C
'

STREET 'D'

H IGH L INE DRIVE
LOT E
LOT B

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

SPILLWAY
50' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)

WETLAND (TYP)
25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP)
LOT A
LOT D
LOT C
LOT F
LOT H

WATER QUALITY BASIN
E.V.A.

W/ KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARDS

KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARD

KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARD

EXISTING CHAIN LINK

FENCE TO BE REPLACED

WITH OPEN SPACE FENCE

EXISTING BASIN

ACCESS ROAD

EXISTING OPEN

SPACE FENCE TO
REMAIN

EXISTING OPEN

SPACE FENCE AND

GATE TO REMAIN

EXISTING GOOD

NEIGHBOR FENCE TO
REMAIN
7 6
5 12
11 10
9 15
14 8
16 4
3 2
13 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 75
74 73
7172
1 53
52 51
50 49
48 47
46 45
44 43
42 41
40 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 70
69 68
67 66
75 74 73
72 71
70 69 68
67 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 43
42 41
40 39
38 37
36 35
34 33
32 31
30 44
18 19
20 21
22 29
28 27
26 25
24 23
66 65
64 63
62 61
60 59
58 57
56 55
54 53
52 51
50 49
48 47
46 45
55 56
57 54
LOT G
7' CMU MASONRY BLOCK WALL
WITHOUT PILASTERS. SEE IMAGE "F"
10' CMU MASONRY BLOCK WALL
WITHOUT PILASTERS. SEE IMAGE "F"
6' GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE ON
RETAINING WALL. SEE DETAIL "E"
6' GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE. SEE
DETAIL "A"
6' ENHANCED GOOD NEIGHBOR
FENCE. SEE DETAIL "D"

TUBULAR STEEL FENCE PER CITY
STANDARD. SEE DETAIL "C"
6' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE PER CITY

STANDARD ON RETAINING WALL
6' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE PER

MULTI-FAMILY PLANS

OPEN SPACE FENCE PER CITY
STANDARD. SEE DETAIL "B"
EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE AT LOT 4

BOUNDARY
SHEET 8 OF 11

PRELIMINARY FENCING PLAN
NOTE: REFER TO DETAILS FROM VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES, DATED AUGUST 10, 2015, SECTION 4.5, WALLS, FENCES, AND GATEWAYS, PAGES 30-39.

FENCING LEGEND
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
240
120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
NORTH
FEBRUARY 4, 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588
LOT 3

MULTI-FAMILY(BY OTHERS)
LOT 2
(75) 45'x68'(TYP.) LOTS

9.68± AC.(G)

8.68± AC (N)
LOT 1
(75)33.25'x81.5'

8.03± AC.(G)

7.51± AC (N)
(TYP.) LOTS
4' OR 6'
SEE
PLAN

Page 784 of 1141 ends

`A` / SMALL FOUNDATION SHRUB (ALTERNATE SP. PER LOT)
EUONYMUS JAPONICUS `MICROPHYLLA` / BOXLEAF EUONYMUS 1 GAL, LOW FESTUCA CINEREA `ELIJAH`S BLUE` / ELIJAH`S BLUE FESCUE 1 GAL, LOW NANDINA DOMESTICA `HARBOUR DWARF` / DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO 5 GAL, MEDIUM SCAEVOLA AEMULA `MAUVE CLUSTERS` / FAN FLOWER 1 GAL, LOW `B` / MEDIUM FOUNDATION SHRUB (ALTERNATE SP. PER LOT)
CALLISTEMON CITRINUS `LITTLE JOHN` / DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH 5 GAL, LOW PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA `WHEELERS DWARF` / WHEELER`S DWARF MOCK ORANGE 5 GAL, MEDIUM RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA `CLARA` / INDIAN HAWTHORN 5 GAL, LOW `C` / LARGE FOUNDATION SHRUB (ALTERNATE SP. PER LOT)
PHORMIUM TENAX `ATROPURPUREUM COMPACTUM` / BRONZE NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GAL, LOW PRUNUS CAROLINIANA `BRIGHT `N TIGHT` / CAROLINA LAUREL 1 GAL, LOW RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `EVE CASE` / CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL, LOW XYLOSMA CONGESTUM / SHINY XYLOSMA ESPALIER 5 GAL, LOW
`D` / FOLIAGE ACCENT SHRUBS (ALTERNATE SP. PER LOT)
BERBERIS THUNBERGII `MONLERS` TM / GOLD NUGGET JAPANESE BARBERRY 5 GAL, LOW CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASS 5 GAL, LOW DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY 1 GAL, LOW
PHORMIUM TENAX `MAORI SUNRISE` / NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GAL, LOW `E` / FLOWERING ACCENT SHRUBS (ALTERNATE SP. PER LOT)
HEMEROCALLIS X `MONOLD` TM / STARBURST DOUBLE GOLD EVERGREEN DAYLILY 1 GAL, MEDIUM LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA `HIDCOTE` / HIDCOTE LAVENDER 5 GAL, LOW NEPETA X FAASSENII `SIX HILLS GIANT` / GIANT CATMINT 1 GAL, LOW SALVIA GREGGII `HEATWAVE BLAZE` / HEATWAVE BLAZE SAGE 5 GAL, LOW `GC` / GROUNDCOVERS (ALTERNATE SP. PER LOT)
CEDRUS DEODARA `FEELIN` BLUE` / FEELIN` BLUE DEODAR CEDAR 5 GAL COTONEASTER HORIZONTALIS / ROCKSPRAY COTONEASTER 5 GAL
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM / TRAILING MYOPORUM 5 GAL
2021-03-23 11:53

CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE

TREES BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
ACER BUERGERIANUM 24"BOX

TRIDENT MAPLE
CELTIS SINENSIS 24"BOX

CHINESE HACKBERRY
CERCIS CANADENSIS 24"BOX

EASTERN REDBUD
PINUS CANARIENSIS 24"BOX

CANARY ISLAND PINE
PINUS ELDARICA 24"BOX

AFGHAN PINE
PISTACIA CHINENSIS `KEITH DAVEY` 24"BOX

KEITH DAVEY CHINESE PISTACHE
QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA 24"BOX

COAST LIVE OAK
QUERCUS RUBRA 24"BOX

RED OAK
ZELKOVA SERRATA `VILLAGE GREEN` 24"BOX

SAWLEAF ZELKOVA

PLANT SCHEDULE
SHEET 9 OF 11
LOT 3 - TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE
1" = 10'PLAN
NORTH
STREET TREE (TYP.)

REFER TO STREET TREE

PLAN FOR TREE SPECIES
STREET TREE (TYP.)

REFER TO STREET TREE

PLAN FOR TREE SPECIES
LOT 1 - TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE
1" = 10'PLAN
NORTH

PRELIMINARY FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE PLAN

GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE
3' WOOD
GATE
3' WOOD
GATE
PLAN 2 PLAN 3PLAN 1
PLAN 3PLAN 2PLAN 1

EUONYMUS JAPONICUS
'MICROPHYLLA'

BOXLEAF EUONYMUS

FESTUCA CINEREA 'ELIJAH'S BLUE'

ELIJAH'S BLUE FESCUE

NANDINA DOMESTICA 'HARBOUR
DWARF'

DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO

SCAEVOLA AEMULA 'MAUVE

CLUSTERS'

FAN FLOWER

CALLISTEMON CITRINUS 'LITTLE
JOHN'

DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH

PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA 'WHEELERS
DWARF'

WHEELER'S DWARF MOCK ORANGE

PRUNUS CERASIFERA 'KRAUTER

VESUVIUS'

PURPLE LEAF PLUM

RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'CLARA'

INDIAN HAWTHORN

PHORMIUM TENAX
'ATROPURPUREUM COMPACTUM'

BRONZE NEW ZEALAND FLAX

PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'BRIGHT N
TIGHT'

CAROLINA LAUREL

RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 'EVE CASE'

CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY

XYLOSMA CONGESTUM

SHINY XYLOSMA

BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'MONLERS'
TM

GOLD NUGGET JAPANESE

BARBERRY

CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA
'KARL FORESTER'

FEATHER REED GRASS

DIETES BICOLOR

FORTNIGHT LILY

PHORMIUM TENAX 'MAORI SUNRISE'

NEW ZEALAND FLAX

HEMEROCALLIS X 'MONOLD' TM

STARBURST DOUBLE GOLD

EVERGREEN DAYLILY

LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA
'HIDCOTE'

HIDCOTE LAVENDER

NEPETA X FAASSENII 'SIX HILLS
GIANT'

GIANT CATMINT

SALVIA GREGGII 'HEATWAVE BLAZE'

HEATWAVE BLAZE SAGE

CEDRUS DEODARA

DEODAR CEDAR

COTONEASTER HORIZONTALIS

ROCKSPRAY COTONEASTER

MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM

TRAILING MYOPORUM

ACER BUERGERIANIUM

TRIDENT MAPLE

CELTIS SINENSIS

CHINESE HACKBERRY

PINUS CANARIENSIS

CANARY ISLAND PINE

PISTACIA CHINENSIS 'KEITH DAVEY'

KEITH DAVEY CHINESE PISTACHE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA

COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS RUBRA

RED OAK

ZELKOVA SERRATA 'VILLAGE
GREEN'

SAWLEAF ZELKOVA

PINUS ELDARCA

AFGHAN PINE

CERCIS CANADENSIS

EASTERN REDBUD

ENHANCED WOOD FENCE

GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE
3' WOOD
GATE3' WOOD
GATE
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
240
120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
NORTH
FEBRUARY 4, 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588
*NO TURF FOR FRONT YARD LANDSCAPES

Page 785 of 1141 ends

City of Fairfield Firetruck
City of Fairfield Firetruck
Cit
y

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City of Fairfield Firetruck
Cit
y

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City of Fairfield Firetruck
Cit
y

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City of Fairfield
F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City of Fairfield Firetruck
Cit
y

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
Ci
t
y

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k

AIR BAS
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
UNIO
N

P
A
C
I
F
I
C
RAILR
O
A
D
PO
R
T
L
A
N
D

D
R
I
V
E
23 22
19 16
17 18
21 20 66
74 73
71 15
5 9
13 42
38 34
30 2
6 10
14 41
37 33
29 3
7 11
40 36
32 44
4 8
12 43
39 35
31 49
57 50
58 51
59 52
60 45
53 46
54 47
55 48
56 64
65 28
26 68 70
72 67 69
63 62
61 1
24 25
27 75
32 38
39 37
36 40
26 27
29 20
14 15
16 24
25 17
18 19
21 22
23 30
35 34
31 33
28 74
12 13
10 9
7 6
5 4
3 11
2 1
8 47
61 46
62 45
63 48
75 76
56 58 57
52 72
73 41
53 54
50 49
51 44
43 42
55 66
65 64
59 67
69 68
71 70
60 Ci
t
y

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
City of Fairfield Firetruck
40 8 22 4.833

24.417
City of Fairfield FiretruckOverall Length 40.000ftOverall Width 8.167ftOverall Body Height 7.500ftMin Body Ground Clearance 0.750ftTrack Width 8.167ftLock-to-lock time 5.00s

PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826240
120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
NORTH

LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.

VILLAGE I

VILLAGE III

VILLAGE II

VILLAGE IV

LAGO VISTA
FEBRUARY 4 , 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
REVISED: JUNE 16, 2025

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588

FIRE ACCESS PLAN FOR

THIS AREA HAS BEEN

PREPARED BY OTHERS
SHEET 10 OF 11
15'-18'

TRAIL/EVA

KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARDS

KNOCK DOWN

BOLLARDS

Page 786 of 1141 ends

CUT
FILL
CUT
FILL
FI
L
L
CUT
CUT
CUT
FILL
FILL
C
U
T
F
I
L
L
CU
T
FIL
L
CU
T
FIL
L
CU
T
F
I
L
L
LOT GWATER QUALITY BASINTOP 41.0BOTTOM 38.5
CO
U
R
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
G
O
L
D
E
N

W
A
Y
ST
R
E
E
T

'
B
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
A
'
ST
R
E
E
T

'
C
'
HIGH
L
I
N
E

STREET 'D'
32 38
39 37
36 40
30 35
34 31
33 74
47 61
46 62
45 63
48 75
76 56
58 57
52 72 73
41 53 54
50 49
51 44
43 42
55 66
65 64
59 67
69 68
71 70
60 P 49.1
C
U
T
F
I
L
L
Elevations Table
Number
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 Minimum Elevation
-50.000
-48.000
-46.000
-44.000
-42.000
-40.000
-38.000
-36.000
-34.000
-32.000
-30.000
-28.000
-26.000
-24.000
-22.000
-20.000
-18.000
-16.000
-14.000
-12.000
-10.000
-8.000
-6.000
-4.000
-2.000

0.000

2.000

4.000

6.000

8.000

10.000

12.000

14.000

16.000

18.000

20.000

22.000

24.000

26.000
Maximum Elevation
-48.000
-46.000
-44.000
-42.000
-40.000
-38.000
-36.000
-34.000
-32.000
-30.000
-28.000
-26.000
-24.000
-22.000
-20.000
-18.000
-16.000
-14.000
-12.000
-10.000
-8.000
-6.000
-4.000
-2.000

0.000

2.000

4.000

6.000

8.000

10.000

12.000

14.000

16.000

18.000

20.000

22.000

24.000

26.000

28.000
Color
CUT
FILL
CUT
FILL

PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK EXHIBIT
9216 KIEFER BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CA 95826240
120
60 0
SCALE: 1" = 60'
N ORTH

LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.

VILLAGE I

VILLAGE III

VILLAGE II

VILLAGE IV

LAGO VISTA
FEBRUARY 4, 2025
REVISED: APRIL 14, 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD, LAGO VISTA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3875 HOPYARD RD, STE 345 Tel 925.847.1556
Fax 925.847.1557PLEASANTON, CA 94588
SHEET 11 OF 11

PRELIMINARY EARTHWORKSUMMARY

CUT (CY)FILL (CY)NET (CY)
LOT 3TENTATIVE MAP FORCONDOMINIUMPURPOSES(BY OTHERS)

Page 787 of 1141 ends

FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD - VILLAGE 2A
PRODUCT 2 - 33'-3" x 81'-6"
APIGNGPQ AUUQEKCVGU IPE.

DCVG

03.25.21 RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION

SHEET INDEX

A-0.1 CLUSTER - LO9ER LEVEL
A-0.2 CLUSTER - UPPER LEVEL
A-0.3 STREET SCENE ELEVATIONS 1
A-0.4 STREET SCENE ELEVATIONS 2
A-0.5 STREET SCENE ELEVATIONS 3
A-1.1 PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLAN
A-1.2 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 1A

SPANISH

A-1.3 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 1B

FARMHOUSE

A-1.4 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 1C

CRAFTSMAN

A-2.1 PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN
A-2.2 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 2A

SPANISH

A-2.3 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 2B

FARMHOUSE

A-2.4 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 2C

CRAFTSMAN

A-3.1 PLAN 3 - FLOOR PLAN
A-3.2 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 3A

SPANISH

A-3.3 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 3B

FARMHOUSE

A-3.4 ELEVATIONS - PLAN 3C

CRAFTSMAN

CM-0.1 COLOR & MATERIAL BOARDS

Page 788 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD
STREET SCENE 1

ELEVATIONS
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
A-0.3
PLAN 1A

SPANISH
PLAN 2C

CRAFTSMAN
PLAN 3B

FARMHOUSE

FRONT ELEVATIONS
PRODUCT 2 - 33'-3" x 81'-6"

Page 789 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD
STREET SCENE 2

ELEVATIONS
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
A-0.4
PLAN 1C

CRAFTSMAN
PLAN 2B

FARMHOUSE
PLAN 3A

SPANISH

FRONT ELEVATIONS
PRODUCT 2 - 33'-3" x 81'-6"

Page 790 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD
STREET SCENE 3

ELEVATIONS
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
A-0.5
PLAN 1B

FARMHOUSE
PLAN 2A

SPANISH
PLAN 3C

CRAFTSMAN

FRONT ELEVATIONS
PRODUCT 2 - 33'-3" x 81'-6"

Page 791 of 1141 ends

57 '
-
6 "
14 '
-
0 "
81 '
-
6 "
10 '
-
0 "
5'
-
0 "
33'-3"
3'-3"26'-0"4'-0"
10 '
-
0 "
18 '
-
0 "
18 '
-
0 "
4'-0"
4'-0"
33'-3"33'-3"
6'-6"
3'-3"29'-3"4'-0"30'-0"
4'-0"
18 '
-
0 "
10 '
-
1 0
"
4'-0"
4'-0"

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG
DINING
9'-0" CLG
LIVING
9'-0" CLG
FOYER
9'-0" CLG
GARAGE
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 4
9'-0" CLGBA 3
8'-0" CLG
PORCH

COVEREDDRIVEWAY
8'-6" CLG
8'-4" CLG
8'-4" CLG
YARD
7'
-
6 "

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG
DINING
9'-0" CLG
LIVING
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 4
9'-0" CLG
BA 3
8'-0" CLG
GARAGE
9'-0" CLG
PORCH
YARD
PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG
DINING
9'-0" CLG
GARAGE
9'-0" CLG
LIVING
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 4
9'-0" CLG
BA 3
9'-0" CLG
YARD
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
2,00 SF, 4 BED, 3 BA 2,062 SF, 4 BED, 3 BA,
BONUS
2,133 SF, 4 BED, 3 BA,
BONUS
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
12'-11" x 15'-3"
10'-6" x 15'-6"
13'-2" x 13'-5"
13'-1" x '-0"
12'-1" x 10'-10"
11'-" x 11'-"
10'-" x 15'-6"
11'-" x 10'-2"
11'-" x 10'-2"
12'-" x 15'-10"
12'-4" x 13'-2"
10'-10" x 10'-0"
PLAN 1

PRIVATE

OPEN SPACE
588 SF
PLAN 2

PRIVATE

OPEN SPACE
50 SF
PLAN 3

PRIVATE

OPEN SPACE
50 SF
21'-512"21'-512"
8'
-
0 "
17'-0"
27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"
17'-0"
17'-0"6'
-
0 "
4'
-
0 "

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

GROUND LEVEL

EXEMPLARY CLUSTER PLAN
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
A-0.1

GROUND LEVEL
PRODUCT 2
BEDROOM DO9N
- 33'-3" X 81'-6"

Page 792 of 1141 ends

MA. BA
8'-0" CLG

LAUNDRY
9'-0" CLG
WIC
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 2
9'-0" CLG BEDRM 3
9'-0" CLG
BA 2
9'-0" CLG
LINEN
9'-0" CLG
MA. BEDRM
8'-0" CLG
M. BEDRM
9'-0" CLG

LAUNDRY
9'-0" CLG
BONUS
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 2
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 3
9'-0" CLG
BA 2
9'-0" CLG
WIC
9'-0" CLG
M. BA
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 2
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 3
9'-0" CLG
BA 2
9'-0" CLG

LAUNDRY
9'-0" CLG
DN
16 R
MA. BEDRM
9'-0" CLG
MA. BATH
9'-0" CLG
W.I.C
9'-0" CLG
BONUS
9'-0" CLG
57 '
-
6 "
14 '
-
0 "
81 '
-
6 "
10 '
-
0 "
33'-3"
3'-3"26'-0"4'-0"
33'-3"33'-3"
3'-3"29'-3"4'-0"30'-0"
PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3
14'-10" x 15'-"
10'-10" x 13'-3"11'-4" x 11'-2"
11'-1" x 10'-10"11'-1" x 10'-10"
16'-0" x 12'-8"
12'-0" x 13'-10"12'-10" x 14'-"
13'-2" x 15'-8"
12'-10" x 11'-2"
12'-3" x 11'-5"

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

UPPER LEVEL

EXEMPLARY CLUSTER PLAN
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
A-0.2

UPPER LEVEL
PRODUCT 2
BEDROOM DO9N
- 33'-3" X 81'-6"

Page 793 of 1141 ends

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG
DINING
9'-0" CLG
LIVING
9'-0" CLG
FOYER
9'-0" CLG
GARAGE
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 4
9'-0" CLGBA 3
8'-0" CLG
PORCH

COVEREDDRIVEWAY
8'-6" CLG
8'-4" CLG
8'-4" CLG
YARD
MA. BA
8'-0" CLG

LAUNDRY
9'-0" CLG
WIC
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 2
9'-0" CLG BEDRM 3
9'-0" CLG
BA 2
9'-0" CLG
LINEN
9'-0" CLG
MA. BEDRM
8'-0" CLG
10 '
-
0 "
18 '
-
0 "
26'-0"
81 '
-
6 "
3'-3"4'-0"
7'
-
6 "
12'-0"14'-0"
12'-11" x 15'-3"
13'-1" x '-0"
12'-1" x 10'-10"
10'-10" x 10'-0"
14'-10" x 15'-"
10'-10" x 13'-3"11'-4" x 11'-2"
14 '
-
0 "
PLAN 1

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
2,00 SF
4 BED, 3 BA

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD A-1.1
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
PLAN 1

FLOOR PLAN

Page 794 of 1141 ends

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SPANISH
PLAN 1A
A-1.2
FRONT

RIGHT REAR

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - FAUX VENT

K - STUCCO WRAPPED POT SHELF

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD

SPANISH
LEFT
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
ROOF

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD
A
K IHE

B DCGJ H
F

Page 795 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - FARMHOUSE
PLAN 1B
A-1.3

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 8" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

FARMHOUSE
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
FRONT

LEFTRIGHTREAR
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
ROOF
A
M IFE

B DCG H
JK

Page 796 of 1141 ends

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - CRAFTMAN
PLAN 1C
A-1.4

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" - 12" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

N - DECORATIVE WOOD POT SHELF

CRAFTSMAN
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD
A
MJFE

B DC G H

K G N M I

Page 797 of 1141 ends

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG
DINING
9'-0" CLG
LIVING
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 4
9'-0" CLG
BA 3
8'-0" CLG
GARAGE
9'-0" CLG
PORCH
YARD
M. BEDRM
9'-0" CLG

LAUNDRY
9'-0" CLG
BONUS
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 2
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 3
9'-0" CLG
BA 2
9'-0" CLG
WIC
9'-0" CLG
M. BA
9'-0" CLG
11'-1" x 10'-10"11'-1" x 10'-10"
16'-0" x 11'-0"
12'-0" x 16'-6"
'-0" x 15'-6"
13'-2" x 13'-5"
11'-" x 11'-5"
12'-3" x 15'-6"
26'-0"
81 '
-
6 "
4'-0"3'-3"
13 '
-
6 "
12'-6"13'-6"
7'
-
6 "
PLAN 2

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
2,062 SF
4 BED, 3 BA, BONUS
18 '
-
0 "

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD A-2.1
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
PLAN 2

FLOOR PLAN

Page 798 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SPANISH
PLAN 2A
A-2.2

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - FAUX VENT

K - STUCCO WRAPPED POT SHELF

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD

SPANISH
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
GI EHF

CL JABDGH

Page 799 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - FARMHOUSE
PLAN 2B
A-2.3

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 8" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

FARMHOUSE
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

E BIJMF
CL A B
K
H G D

Page 800 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - CRAFTMAN
PLAN 2C
A-2.4

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" - 12" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

N - DECORATIVE WOOD POT SHELF

CRAFTSMAN
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" - 12" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

N - DECORATIVE WOOD POT SHELF

CRAFTSMAN
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

E BIJFK

CHABG D

E BIJMFK

CLHABG D

Page 801 of 1141 ends

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG
DINING
9'-0" CLG
GARAGE
9'-0" CLG
LIVING
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 4
9'-0" CLG
BA 3
9'-0" CLG
YARD
BEDRM 2
9'-0" CLG
BEDRM 3
9'-0" CLG
BA 2
9'-0" CLG

LAUNDRY
9'-0" CLG
DN
16 R
MA. BEDRM
9'-0" CLG
MA. BATH
9'-0" CLG
W.I.C
9'-0" CLG
BONUS
9'-0" CLG
12'-10" x 1'-1"
13'-2" x 13'-4"
11'-1" x 11'-"
14'-2" x 11'-0"
11'-" x 10'-2"
11'-" x 10'-2"
12'-" x 15'-10"
12'-4" x 13'-2"
26'-0"
81 '
-
6 "
3'-3"4'-0"
7'
-
6 "
13'-4"12'-8"
13 '
-
6 "
PLAN 3

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
2,133 SF
4 BED, 3 BA, BONUS
18 '
-
0 "
10 '
-
1 0
"

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD A-3.1
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
PLAN 3

FLOOR PLAN

Page 802 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SPANISH
PLAN 3A
A-3.2

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - FAUX VENT

K - STUCCO WRAPPED POT SHELF

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD

SPANISH
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
M
A B C

J H IFKE
D G

Page 803 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - FARMHOUSE
PLAN 3B
A-3.3

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 8" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

FARMHOUSE
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

H FKJ GMEN I

A B C D G

Page 804 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - CRAFTSMAN
PLAN 3C
A-3.4
FRONT

RIGHT REAR LEFT
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
ROOF
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

MJK BIEN

A B C D G
H IF

A - FLAT TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B- 7" - 12" OVER HANG

C - STUCCO

D - VINYL WINDOW

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
F - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

G - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

H - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

I - BATTERED WALL

J - CEMENTITIOUS GABLE END VENT
DETAIL

K - WOOD TRIM

L - RECESSED FAUX GRILL

M - DECORATIVE WOOD KICKER

N - DECORATIVE WOOD POT SHELF

CRAFTSMAN

Page 805 of 1141 ends

03.25.21Angeleno Associates, Inc.147 City Place Drive, Santa Ana , Ca 92705 www. angelenoarchitects.com Tel: (714) 285-1888 VILLAGE 2A

RANCHO TOLENAS CORPORATION
2001 2021 © Angeleno Associates, Inc.

VILLAGES @ FAIRFIELD

COLOR & MATERIAL BOARDS
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
CM-0.1

COLOR & MATERIAL BOARDS
PRODUCT 2 - 33'-3" x 81'-6"

Page 806 of 1141 ends

Page 807 of 1141 ends

Page 808 of 1141 ends

Page 809 of 1141 ends

15'-10" x 14'-6"
Great Room
PLAN 1
3 Beds, 2.5 Ba.
1,825 Sq. Ft.

Pdr.Entry
11'-4" x 13'-2"
Dining Room
Kitchen
20'-2" x 20'-0"
Garage
Porch
14'-2" x 13'-6"
Opt. California Room
up
17 r.

L.L.

PLAN 2
4 Beds, 2.5 Ba.

Loft
2,058 Sq. Ft.

PLAN 3
3 Beds, 2.5 Ba.

Loft / Opt. Bed. 4
2,344 Sq. Ft.

Entry
Kitchen
15'-10" x 9'-6"
Dining Room
Pdr.
20'-2" x 20'-2"
Garage
Porch
California Room
12'-6" x 9'-6"
Opt Ext. California Room
12'-6" x 15'-6"
opt.
up
17 r
.
zonedrop
linen
15'-10" x 15'-0"
Great Room
Entry
Kitchen
20'-2" x 20'-2"
Garage
drop
Porch
Pdr.

UP
17R
zone
linen405 Sq. Ft.
23'-4" x 17'-10"
Great Room
22'-8" x 6'-0"
Opt. California Room
dropzone
45'-0"45'-0"45'-0"
4'-0"37'-0"4'-0"4'-0"37'-0"4'-0"4'-0"37'-0"4'-0"
68 '
-
0 "
5'
-
0 "
16 '
-
0 "
39 '
-
0 "
13 '
-
0 "
18 '
-
0 "
10 '
-
0 "
18 '
-
0 "
18 '
-
0 "
10 '
-
0 "
10 '
-
0 "
15 '
-
0 "
14 '
-
0 "
16 '
-
0 "
8'
-
0 "
8'
-
0 "
7'
-
0 "
45'-0"28'-8"
metersmetersmeters
4'-0"
PLAN 3
Private Open Space
750 s.f.

PLAN 2
Private Open Space
756 s.f.

PLAN 1
Private Open Space
955 s.f.

A0.1FIRST FLOOR PLANS
45' X 68' LOTS048 12
Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
Architecture + Planning
The Leamington Building
1814 Franklin St., Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
FEBRUARY 17, 2021#
VILLAGE 2A
Fairfield, Ca. 2020-0970
VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD PRODUCT 3

Page 810 of 1141 ends

Laund.
12'-0" x 11'-0"
Bedroom 2 13'-0" x 12'-0"
Bedroom 3Ba 2
walk incloset20 l.f.
linen
42x60
shwr pan
Bath 2
11'-8" x 10'-6"
Bedroom 2
10'-8" x 10'-6"
Bedroom 3
Laund.
11'-4" x 10'-6"
Opt. LoftBedroom 4 /
dn
17 r
.
42x60
shwr pan
PLAN 2 PLAN 1
walk incloset22 l.f.
12'-0" x 11'-0"
Bedroom 2
Ba 2
Laund.

DN
17R
linen
linen
walk incloset27 l.f.

Primary
Bedroom
14'-10" x 14'-8"
Primary
Bedroom
16'-4" x 14'-4"
Primary
Bedroom
14'-6" x 14'-0"
Primary
Bath
Primary
Bath
Primary
Bath
Loft /
Opt. Bedroom 4
13'-2" x 12'-10"
14'-2" x 11'-6"
Bedroom 2
PLAN 3
A0.2SECOND FLOOR PLANS
45' X 68' LOTS048 12
Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
Architecture + Planning
The Leamington Building
1814 Franklin St., Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
FEBRUARY 17, 2021#
VILLAGE 2A
Fairfield, Ca. 2020-0970
VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD PRODUCT 3

Page 811 of 1141 ends

Page 812 of 1141 ends

Page 813 of 1141 ends

Page 814 of 1141 ends

Page 815 of 1141 ends

Page 816 of 1141 ends

Page 817 of 1141 ends

Page 818 of 1141 ends

Page 819 of 1141 ends

Page 820 of 1141 ends

Page 821 of 1141 ends

Page 822 of 1141 ends

Page 823 of 1141 ends

Page 824 of 1141 ends

Page 825 of 1141 ends

Page 826 of 1141 ends

Page 827 of 1141 ends

Page 828 of 1141 ends

Page 829 of 1141 ends

Page 830 of 1141 ends

ARCHITECTURE
A.1.0 SITE PLAN
A.1.1 FIRE & TRASH COLLECTION ACCESS PLAN
A.1.2 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 1
A.1.3 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2
A.1.4 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 3
A.1.5 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 4
A.2.1 UNIT PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLANS
A.2.2 UNIT PLAN 3 - FLOOR PLANS
A.2.3 UNIT PLAN 3X - FLOOR PLANS
A.2.4 UNIT PLAN 5- FLOOR PLANS
A.2.5 BUILDING FLOOR PLANS - BUILDINGS 1, 1X & 3
A.2.6 BUILDING FLOOR PLANS - BUILDINGS 3X & 5
A.3.1 BUILDING 1- ELEVATION 1A
A.3.2 BUILDING 1- ELEVATION 1C
A.3.3 BUILDING 1X- ELEVATION 1XA
A.3.4 BUILDING 3- ELEVATION 3A
A.3.5 BUILDING 3- ELEVATION 3C
A.3.6 BUILDING 3X- ELEVATION 3XA
A.3.7 BUILDING 5- ELEVATION 5A
A.3.8 BUILDING 5- ELEVATION 5B
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
PROJECT INFO:

A.4.1 LEASING BUILDING - PLANS & ELEVATIONS
A.4.2 FITNESS BUILDING- PLANS & ELEVATIONS
A.4.3 MAINTENANCE BUILDING - FLOOR PLAN & ELEVS
A.4.4 TRASH ENCLOSURE - FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS
A.4.5 MAIL BUILDING - FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS
A.5.1 COLORS AND MATERIALS
VICINITY MAP:

TITLE SHEET T-1
SHEET INDEX:

T-1 TITLE SHEET
LANDSCAPE:

L-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
L-2 RECREATION AREA ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L-3 TYPICAL CLUSTER PLAN ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L-4 FENCE AND WALL PLAN
CIVIL:

C1.1 COVER SHEET
C2.1 DIMENSION AND PAVING PLAN
C3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C4.1 COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN
C5.1 CROSS SECTIONS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

APPLICANT:

RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KIEFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
CONTACT: ROB WHITE
[email protected]
(916) 403-1718
ARCHITECT:

ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR.

SANTA ANA, CA 92705
CONTACT: CHRISTINE LY
[email protected]
(714) 285-1888
CIVIL ENGINEER:

NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
620 12TH STREET
MODESTO, CA 95354
CONTACT: CASEY WALKER
[email protected]
(209) 524-3535 X 111
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

SITESCAPES
3190 B-2 AIRPORT LOOP DRIVE
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS
[email protected]
(949) 644-9370
LOT 3 OF TENTATIVE MAP - APN 170-050-540

BY OTHERS

Page 831 of 1141 ends

8'-012"
11 '
-
1 12"
7 '
-
0 "
10'-1
"
4 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 POOL

FITNESS
MAIL
2D
2D
4 3
4 5
4 4
2 2
4 MAINT
BBQ
1 1
3 24'-0"
24'-0"
26 '
-
0 "
26 '
-
0 "
26 '
-
0 "
26 '
-
0 "
26'-0"
26'-0"
2 6
'
-
0 "
26'-0"
1 2D
2D
2D
2D
2D
2D
1D
1D
1D
2D 2D
2 0
0 0
2D
2D
2D
2D
0 0
1D
1D

DOG PARK
2 1
1 24'-0"
26'-0"
24'-0"
35'-3"
20'-0"
20'-0"
2 6
'
-
0 "
26'-0"
26'-0"
1 5
0 '
-
0 "
1 3
8 '
-
7 "
24'-0"
24'-0"
1 2
8 '
-
8 "
1 4
2 '
-
4 "
13 6
'
-
3 "
26 '
-
0 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 TRASH
3 LEASING
3 2
DUPLEXES, TYP.
26' W VEHICULAR GATE
RECREATION AREA:

LEASING, FITNESS, MAIL,

MAINTENANCE, & BBQ

MAIN PROJECT ENTRY

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

NOT A PART

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

NOT A PART

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

NOT A PART

SECONDARY

VEHICULAR ACCESS

WATER QUALITY BASIN
1 M

HIGH LIN
E

D
R
I
V
E

AIR BASE

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
24 '
-
0 "
2D
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 30'
60'
120'
240'SITE PLAN A.1.0

Page 832 of 1141 ends

4 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 POOL

FITNESS
MAIL
2D
2D
4 3
4 5
4 4
2 2
4 MAINT
BBQ
1 1
3 24'-0"
20'-0"
1 2D
2D
2D
2D
2D
2D
1D
1D
1D
2D 2D
2 0
0 0
2D
2D
2D
2D
0 0
1D
1D

DOG PARK
2 1
1 R28'-0
"
R28'-
0 "
20 '
-
0 "
R28
'
-
0 "
R2
8 '
-
0 "
24'-0"
1 3
8 '
-
7 "
24'-0"
1 2
8 '
-
8 "
24'-0"
1 4
2 '
-
4 "
26'-0"
2 6
'
-
0 "
20'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"
26 '
-
0 "
26 '
-
0 "
26 '
-
0 "
26 '
-
0 "
29'-3 316 "
26'-0"
2 6
'
-
0 "
24'-0"
13 6
'
-
3 "
12 8
'
-
6 "
13 0
'
-
6 12"
24'-0"
26'-0"
24 '
-
0 "
R28'-
0 "
R28
'
-
0 "
R2
8 '
-
0 "
R
2 8
'
-
0 "
R28'-0
"
R
2 8
'
-
0 "
R28'-
0 "
R
2 8
'
-
0 "
R28
'
-
0 "
R
2 8
'
-
0 "
R28'-0"
R28
'
-
0 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 TRASH
68'
1 5
0 '
1 5
0 '
1 1
3 '
1 1
8 '
1 5
0 '
1 5
0 '
-
0 "
3 1
5 0
'

LEASING
91'
3 2
DUPLEXES, TYP.
26' W VEHICULAR GATE
RECREATION AREA:

LEASING, FITNESS, MAIL,

MAINTENANCE, & BBQ

MAIN PROJECT ENTRY

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

NOT A PART

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

NOT A PART

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

NOT A PART

SECONDARY

VEHICULAR ACCESS

WATER QUALITY BASIN
1 1
1 6
'
M

HIGH LIN
E

D
R
I
V
E

AIR BASE

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
2D
City

o
f

F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d

F
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
1 3
3 '
20 '
-
0 "
R
2 8
'
-
0 "
R28'-
0 "
79'88'79'88'

TYPICAL FIRE ACCESS TO DUPLEX REAR YARDS

FIRE LANE
6'-6"
6'-6"
5'
-
0 "
6'-6"
5'
-
0 "

FIRE LANE TURNING RADIUS

FIRE HOSE PULL & LENGTH

FRONT DOOR LOCATION OF DUPLEXES
LEGEND:
100'
28'-0" INSIDE, 48'-0" OUTSIDE
0 30'
60'
120'
240'FIRE & TRASH COLLECTION ACCESS PLAN A.1.1
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
20'
20'
20'
R
=
2 8
'
R=28
'
R=48
'
FIRE LANE CLEAR DIMENSION20
'
-
0 "

TRASH COLLECTION ACCESS

BUILDING TYPE CONSTRUCTION
TYPE
NO. OF

STORY OCCUPANCY SPRINKLER
DUPLEXES VB 2 R3/U 13D
LEASING VB 1 B1 13
FITNESS VB 1 B1 13
MAINTENANCE VB 1 U NONE
MAIL VB 1 U NONE
TRASH VB 1 U NONE

Page 833 of 1141 ends

A.1.2
PERSPECTIVE VIEW 1

THESE RENDERINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS

OF THE COMMUNITY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302

Page 834 of 1141 ends

PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
A.1.3
PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2

Page 835 of 1141 ends

A.1.4
PERSPECTIVE VIEW 3

THESE RENDERINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS

OF THE COMMUNITY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302

Page 836 of 1141 ends

A.1.5
PERSPECTIVE VIEW 4

THESE RENDERINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS

OF THE COMMUNITY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302

Page 837 of 1141 ends

K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
PLAN 1
1,175 SF RENTABLE AREA
2 BED, 2 BA

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
16'-412"
48 '
-
0 "
10'x20' MIN.

COUNTRY

KITCHEN
LIVING

BACKYARD
BEDRM 2
PRIM. BEDRM
BA 2
LAU
PRIM. BA
DN
UP
ENTRY
10'-1" x 13'-3"
15'-7" x 11'-6"11'-7" x 8'-4"
15'-5" x 13'-10"
7'-0" x 13'-0"
PRIM. CLT
AC
GARAGE
16'-412"
48 '
-
0 "

PARKING
STALL
19'-812"
13 '
-
4 "
10'-2"
20 '
-
2 "
STOR
CLT
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
UNIT PLAN 1 A.2.1

FLOOR PLANS

Page 838 of 1141 ends

K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
PLAN 3
1,611 SF RENTABLE AREA
3 BED, 2.5 BA

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
48 '
-
0 "
25'-412"
DN UP
ENTRY
LIVING
DINING

KITCHEN
PWD
PRIM. BEDRMPRIM. BA
BEDRM 2
BA 2
BEDRM 3
LAU
GARAGE
AC
LOWER
ROOF10'-7" x 10'-10"
12'-6" x 11'-8"
13'-10" x 14'-4"
14'-9" x 8'-6"
16'-0" x 12'-10"
9'-8" x 14'-6"

BACKYARD
11'-10" x 13'-4"
PRIM. CLT
20'X20' MIN.
49 '
-
0 "
21'-1"
5'
-
0 "
28'-812"
13 '
-
4 "
STOR
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
UNIT PLAN 3 A.2.2

FLOOR PLANS

Page 839 of 1141 ends

K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
PLAN 3X
1,627 SF RENTABLE AREA
3 BED, 2.5 BA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
DN UP
ENTRY

BACKYARD

KITCHEN
PWD
PRIM. BEDRM
PRIM. BA.

BEDRM 2
BA 2
BEDRM 3
LAU
GARAGE
LIVING
DINING

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
10'-7" x 10'-10"
12'-6" x 11'-8"
13'-10" x 14'-4"
14'-9" x 8'-6"
16'-0" x 12'-10"
9'-8" x 14'-6"
9'-11" x 13'-4"
PRIM. CLT
AC
48 '
-
0 "
25'-412"
50 '
-
0 "
25'-412"
20'X20' MIN.
5'
-
0 "
26'-934"
13 '
-
4 "
PORCH
LOWER
ROOF
STOR
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
UNIT PLAN 3X A.2.3

FLOOR PLANS

Page 840 of 1141 ends

K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINAK-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA

BACKYARD
15'-0" x 10'-7"
AC
48 '
-
0 "
31'-0"
5'
-
0 "
27'-912"
DN
UP
ENTRY

KITCHEN
BEDRM 2
BA 2
LAU
GARAGE
14'-5" x 13'-0"
12'-9" x 9'-10"
CLT
20'X20' MIN.

DINING
10'-10" x 10'-0"
LIVING
12'-10" x 11'-0"
BEDRM 3
12'-0" x 10'-6"
BA 3
LOFT
13'-8" x 14'-4"
PRIM. BEDRM
14'-6" x 14'-4"
PRIM. BA.

PRIM. CLT
PLAN 5
1,829 SF RENTABLE AREA
3 BED, 3 BA, LOFT

SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
LOWER

ROOF PORCH
43 '
-
4 12"
26'-1"
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
UNIT PLAN 5 A.2.4

FLOOR PLANS

Page 841 of 1141 ends

UNIT 1AUNIT 1B-R
16'-412"16'-412"2"
48 '
-
0 "
32'-11"
5'
-
0 "
48 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
16'-412"16'-412"2"
UNIT 1AUNIT 1B-R
48 '
-
0 "
32'-11"
48 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
25'-412"25'-412"2"
UNIT 3AUNIT 3A-R
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
48 '
-
0 "
50'-11"
5'
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
25'-412"25'-412"2"
UNIT 3AUNIT 3A-R
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
49 '
-
0 "
50'-11"
41'-11"
5'
-
0 "
2,786 SF RENTABLE AREA
UNIT 1AUNIT 3A-R
25'-412"16'-412"2"
48 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
41'-11"
5'
-
0 "
UNIT 1AUNIT 3A-R
25'-412"16'-412"2"
48 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
UNIT 1AUNIT 3A-R
25'-412"16'-412"2"
48 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
21'-1"16'-412"2"
UNIT 1AUNIT 3A-R
49 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
21'-1"16'-412"2"
UNIT 1AUNIT 3A-R
49 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
21'-1"16'-412"2"
UNIT 1AUNIT 3A-R
49 '
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
41'-11"
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
BUILDING 1

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR
BUILDING FLOOR PLANS A.2.5
BUILDINGS 1, 1X & 3
BUILDING 3

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR
BUILDING 1X

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

Page 842 of 1141 ends

K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINAK-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA 25'-412"28'-412"2"
UNIT 3AXUNIT 3A-R
48 '
-
0 "
53'-11"
5'
-
0 "
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
25'-412"28'-412"2"
UNIT 3AXUNIT 3A-R
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
49 '
-
0 "
53'-11"
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
25'-412"30'-0"2"
UNIT 5AUNIT 3B-R
48 '
-
0 "
55'-612"
5'
-
0 "
21'-1"26'-1"2"
UNIT 5AUNIT 3B-R
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINAK-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
47'-4"
49 '
-
0 "
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
BUILDING FLOOR PLANS A.2.6
BUILDINGS 3X & 5
BUILDING 3X

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR
BUILDING 5

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

Page 843 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
6 '
-
6 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR
H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND
B - 7" FOAM EAVE

C - FOAM RAFTER TAILS

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR

O - METAL AWNING

P - DECORATIVE TILE INSET
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302

AIDIJKHECJ
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
F O
BUILDING 1 A.3.1
ELEVATION 1A
IJ

Page 844 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
6 '
-
5 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B - 7" FOAM EAVE
LEGEND

Z - METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOORG - COMPOSITE SHUTTERS H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

L - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
BUILDING 1 A.3.2
ELEVATION 1C

AIIDIJHEBJ
K
L F Z

Page 845 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
7 '
-
0 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O.SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O.SHTG
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA

RIGHTLEFT
FRONT
REAR
4 :12
RI
D
G
E
4 :12

3. 5

:
1 2
RIDGE

3. 5

:
1 2
4 :12
RI
D
G
E
4 :12

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND

Y - METAL POTSHELF

Z - METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTC - FOAM RAFTER TAILS

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOORG - COMPOSITE SHUTTERS H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

L - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD

M - STUCCO WRAPPED POT SHELF

O - METAL AWNING
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
BUILDING 1 A.3.3
ELEVATION 1XA

A IIDIJHECJ
KML
ZF
JOZ
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302

Page 846 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
6 '
-
9 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
9'
-
1 "
±2
6 '
-
9 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND
B - 7" FOAM EAVE

C - FOAM RAFTER TAILS

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENTY - METAL POTSHELF

Z - METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
BUILDING 3 A.3.4
ELEVATION 3A

AIIEH CID JFKZ

Page 847 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
7 '
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR
H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B - 7" FOAM EAVE
LEGEND

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR

Z - METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
EIHD
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
IA F
BUILDING 3 A.3.5
ELEVATION 3C
BJ IZ

Page 848 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
PL
±2
6 '
-
6 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINAK-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND
B - 7" FOAM EAVE

C - FOAM RAFTER TAILS

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR

G - COMPOSITE SHUTTERS
H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
A EII
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

D JJFGKH
BUILDING 3X A.3.6
ELEVATION 3XA
J C

Page 849 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
8 '
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR
H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND
B - 7" FOAM EAVE

C - FOAM RAFTER TAILS

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR

O - METAL AWNING

P - DECORATIVE TILE INSET

M - STUCCO WRAPPED POT SHELF

S - WOOD CORBEL

T - DECORATIVE PAVER

V - DECORATIVE METAL GRILL
5 :
1 2

Y - METAL POTSHELF

Z - METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

AI CVJKMTOHIK
BUILDING 5 A.3.7
ELEVATION 5A
H Z

Page 850 of 1141 ends

9'
-
1 "
±2
7 '
-
9 "
9'
-
1 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O. SHTG
T.O.PL.

T.O. SLAB
T.O.PL.

T.O. SHTG
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
FRONT

RIGHTLEFT
REAR
H - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

I - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

J - STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

K - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND
B - 7" FOAM EAVE

C - FOAM RAFTER TAILS

D - STUCCO

E - VINYL WINDOW

F - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR

M - STUCCO WRAPPED POT SHELFT - DECORATIVE PAVER

V - DECORATIVE METAL GRILLY - METAL POTSHELF

Z - METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'

AV CIIOHIK
BUILDING 5 A.3.8
ELEVATION 5B

Z I KIJJ

Page 851 of 1141 ends

11 '
-
1 "
±1
6 '
-
9 "
11 '
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.SHTG

RIGHT ELEVATION
BB
F

RECEPTION
1,073 SF CONDITIONED + 252 SF EQUIPMENT AREA
25'-0"
58 '
-
1 0
"
OFFICE

BACK OF HOUSE/
STOR./

BREAK RM
ELEC
FIRE
POOL EQUIP.
+ 134 SF PORTICO AREA
±1
6 '
-
9 "
11 '
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.SHTG

FRONT ELEVATION

REAR ELEVATION

O- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

P- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

Q- DECORATIVE SHUTTERR- METAL FENCING AND GATE

S- GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B - 12" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO

D - COMPOSITE LOUVER DOOR

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR

F - COMPOSITE LOUVER VENT

G - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

H - CERAMIC TILE
LEGEND

L- TERRA COTTA PAVER

LEFT ELEVATION
11 '
-
1 "
±1
6 '
-
9 "
11 '
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.

SHTG
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
B
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
GELQPA
LEASING BUILDING A.4.1

PLAN & ELEVATIONS
FD
P

FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
S C
G
H

Page 852 of 1141 ends

30"
48 "
30 8
0 30"

RESTROOM
ENTRY 1 MEN
WOMEN

FITNESS
ENTRY 2
1,782 SF CONDITIONED + 313 SF RESTROOMS
47'-10"
63 '
-
1 1
"

SPECIALTY

FITNESS

EXERCISE

EQUIPMENT

FIRE ELEC
±1
7 '
-
6 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.SHTG
±1
7 '
-
6 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.SHTG

O- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

P- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

S- GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS

T- CONCRETE BLOCK WALL

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B - 12" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO

D - COMPOSITE LOUVER DOOR

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
LEGEND

F - COMPOSITE LOUVER VENT

G - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT
H - CERAMIC TILEI - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

J- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD

K- DECORATIVE STUCCO GRILL

L- TERRA COTTA PAVER
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
A
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
KJGCEL
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
FITNESS BUILDING A.4.2

PLAN & ELEVATIONS
OB
D

FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
KSO

Page 853 of 1141 ends

LEFT ELEVATION
K-2241-8MEMOIRSLAVATORYVITREOUS CHINA
35 '
-
6 "
22'-8"
21'-0"
CART
STOR.

ELEC
ENTRY

MAINTENANCE
WORK
AREA
770 SF

FRONT ELEVATION
9'
-
1 "
±1
7 '
-
0 "
9'
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.SHTG

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B - 12" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO

D - COMPOSITE LOUVER DOOR

E - COMPOSITE ENTRY DOOR
LEGEND
I - PANELED SECTIONAL GAR. DOOR

J- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM HOOD

K- DECORATIVE STUCCO GRILLO- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

G - DECORATIVE GABLE VENT

RIGHT ELEVATION

REAR ELEVATION
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
D G K
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
J EAIB
MAINTENANCE BUILDING A.4.3

FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS
O C

ROOF PLAN

FLOOR PLAN

Page 854 of 1141 ends

8'
-
1 "
1'
-
6 "
9'
-
7 "
J
8'
-
0 "
J

WEST - FRONT ELEVATIONEAST - REAR ELEVATION
40'-0"
16 '
-
0 "
640 SF

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
LEGEND

T- CONCRETE BLOCK WALL

U- CORREGATED METAL ROOF

V- METAL BEAM

W- METAL GATE
8'
-
0 "

SOUTH - LEFT ELEVATION
8'
-
0 "

NORTH - RIGHT ELEVATION
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
TRASH ENCLOSURE A.4.4

FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS

FLOOR PLAN
T U W

ROOF PLAN

V T U WV

Page 855 of 1141 ends

MAIL CENTER
10'-0" CLG
15'-0"
22 '
-
0 "
330 SF UNCONDITIONED

RIGHT ELEVATION
±1
3 '
-
9 "
10 '
-
1 "
T.O.PL.

T.O.SLAB
T.O.SHTG
10 '
-
1 "

A - 'S' TILE CONCRETE ROOF
B - 12" FOAM EAVE

C - STUCCO
LEGEND

M- METAL AWNING WITH BRACKETS

O- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM CORBEL

P- STUCCO WRAPPED FOAM TRIM

R- METAL FENCING AND GATE

S- GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS
B
PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
A
0 1'
2'
4'
8'
16'
MAIL BUILDING A.4.5

FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS
COPR

ROOF PLAN

FLOOR PLAN

Page 856 of 1141 ends

PHONE:

PHONE:JOB:

INDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD, CA
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KEIFER BLVD, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(909) 403-1718
ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DR., SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 285-1888

06.23.2025
2302
CM.5.1

COLOR & MATERIAL BOARDS

Page 857 of 1141 ends

Page 858 of 1141 ends

Page 859 of 1141 ends

Page 860 of 1141 ends

INDEPENDENCE

FAIRFIELD
5'
-
6 "
8'-0" O.C. MAX.
1 2"x7" TOP & BOTTOM RAIL2
5"x5" VINYL POST W/ DOMED CAP
3 6" TONGUE & GROOVE
4 FENCEWORKS, INC.
#V-001 OR EQUAL
1-800-350-5620
COLOR: TBD
12 3
INSTALL ON RET. WALL WHERE
OCCURS PER MFG. SPECIFICATION
8'-0" o.c.
6'
-
0 "
* T.S. Fence
Color: Black
112" SQ. TOP, MID & BOTTOM RAILS1
212" SQ. POST2
3 4" SQ. PICKET 4" O.C.3
2 3
DOUBLE PICKETS @ BOTTOM

PROVIDED AT DOG PARK ENCLOSURE
4 4
1 6'
-
0 "

M
A
X
.
10" WIDE CAPELLA CAP (10" x 2" x 10 58")
COLOR: SMOOTH "SUNSET RED"

BY PACIFIC CLAY OR EQUAL
8" CMU BLOCK WALL W/ STUCCO FINISH
COLOR: WHITE
1 2
1 2
1 1
6'

M
I
N
.

7 '

H
T
.

A
I
R
B
A
S
E
PA
R
K
W
A
Y
8x8x16 SPLITFACE BLOCK WALL
(1-SIDE)
COLOR: TBD
2 2" THICK PRECAST CONCRETE CAP
COLOR: TBD
2 W
M
B
F
P
WM BFP
M

HIGH LIN
E

D
R
I
V
E

AIR BASE

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
40 3
7 3
7 37
3 8
3 8
3 8
3 939
3 9
3 9
3 9
4 1
70 67
68 69
71 72
3839
3 9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4" THICK PRECISION CAP
COLOR: NATURAL GRAY
1 24" SQ. CMU BLOCK

COLUMN W/
STUCCO FINISH.

COLOR: WHITE
2 ADJACENT WALL/ OR

FENCE PER PLAN
3 1
6'
-
8 "
3 2
2'-0"

FENCE & WALL LEGEND

SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL

PRIVACY VINYL FENCE
*TUBULAR STEEL ENTRY GATE ACCESS
6' HT. STUCCO WALL
6' HT. T.S. FENCE

CMU BLOCK WALL BY OTHERS
6' HT. T.S. FENCE @ DOG PARK
24" SQ. PERIMETER PILASTER
*BASIN ACCESS GATE
RANCHO TOLENAS CORP.
9216 KIEFER BLVD., SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
(916) 403-1718

FAIRFIELD, CAINDEPENDENCE IN FAIRFIELD
JOB# 25-012
NORTH
DATE: 06-23-2025
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"
0 50' 100'

MONUMENT SIGN WALL
6' HT. T.S. FENCE/ OR @ DOG PARK
SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL 6' HT. STUCCO WALL

PRIVACY VINYL FENCE

MAIN VEHICULAR ENTRY GATE - ELEVATION
FENCE & WALL PLAN AND DETAILS L4

PRECISION BLOCK PILASTER
7' HT. SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL

Page 861 of 1141 ends

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT
EXISTING 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING 50' WETLAND BUFFER

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE

WATER QUALITY BASIN

PER OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
AIR B
A
S
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y

EXISTING WETLAND

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

BENCHMARK
ELEVATION: 46.94'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD BENCHMARK NO. 21. BRASS DISK
STAMPED RCE 8560. STREET MONUMENT 5 FEET NORTH OF
THE CENTER LINE OF HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND 5 FEET
WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF STANFORD COURT, 0.6 FEET
BELOW STREET LEVEL.

SHEET INDEX

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. C1.1 COVER SHEET

SITE PLANS

2. C2.1 DIMENSION AND PAVING PLAN

3. C3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN

4. C4.1 COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN

5. C5.1 CROSS SECTIONS

PRELIMINARY CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORINDEPENDENCE INFAIRFIELD

FAIRFIELD,CALIFORNIA
0 1" =
60 30 60
60'

VICINITY MAP

CONTACTS
A. REGULATORY AGENCY:CITY OF FAIRFIELD

PLANNING DIVISION
1000 WEBSTER STREET, 2ND FLOOR
FAIRFIELD, CA 94533
T: (707) 428-7461
B. OWNER/DEVELOPER:LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
1156 NORTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE
UPLAND, CA. 91786
T: (909) 579-1209
D. ENGINEER:NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
620 12TH STREET
MODESTO, CA. 95354
T: (209) 524-3525
F: (209) 524-3526
CONTACT: CASEY WALKER
E. ARCHITECT:ANGELENO ASSOCIATES, INC.
147 E. CITY PLACE DRIVE,

SANTA ANA, CA
T: (714) 285-1888
CONTACT: CHRISTINE LY
F. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SITESCAPES
3190 B-2 AIPORT LOOP DRIVE
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
T: (949) 644-9370
CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS

PROJECT LOCATION

SITE ADDRESS
TBD, APN 017-005-0540
FAIRFIELD, CA 94533

PREPARED FOR
CLIENT:

LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
1156 NORTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE
UPLAND, CA. 91786
T: (909) 579-1209
CONTACT:

ROB WHITE

ABBREVIATIONS

PLUS OR MINUS (NOT EXACT)
AT

AGGREGATE BASE

ASPHALT CONCRETE

ACCESSIBLE

AVERAGE DAILY TRUCK TRAFFIC

ATRIUM GRATE

ALTERNATE

ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER

AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER RISER
AVENUE

BEGIN CURVE

BOUNDARY

BACK FLOW PREVENTOR
BOOK

BENCH MARK

BACK OF WALK

BUILDING SETBACK LINE

BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE

CURB AND GUTTER

CATCH BASIN

CONTINUOUS DEFLECTION

SEPARATORS

CAST IRON PIPE

CENTER LINE

CORRUGATED METAL PIPE

CLEAN OUT

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

COMPACTION

CONCRETE

CONTINUOUS

CURB RETURN
COURT

CHECK VALVE

DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE

DRAIN INLET

DIAMETER

DUCTILE IRON PIPE

DOMESTIC
DRIVE

DRIVEWAY
EAST

END OF CURVE

ELECTROLIER

ELEVATION

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

END OF RETURN

EASEMENT

EXISTING

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FLARED END SECTION

FINISH FLOOR

FINISH GRADE

FIRE HYDRANT

FLOW LINE

FORCE MAIN

FIRE SERVICE

FIRE SPRINKLER RISER

GALVANIZED

GRADE BREAK

GRATE, GRADE, OR GROUND

GROUND SHOT ELEVATION

GROUND SHOT AT WALL

GATE VALVE

HORIZONTAL

HIGH POINT
HEIGHT

INSIDE DIAMETER
INVERT

IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF

DEDICATION

IRRIGATION

LINEAL FEET OR LINEAR FEET
LANE

LOW POINT

JOINT TRENCH
±
@
AB
AC
ACC
ADTT
AG
ALT
APN
ASR
AVE
BC
BDRY
BFP
BK
BM
BW
BSL
BVC
C&G OR C.G.

CB
CDS
CIP
℄ OR CL
CMP
CO
COF OR C.O.F.

COMP.

CONC OR CC
CONT
CR
CT.

CV
DDCV
DI
DIA
DIP
(DOM)
DR
DW
E
EC
ELC
ELEV
EP
ER

ESMT OR EASE

EX OR EXIST
FDC
FES
FF
FG
FH
FL
FM
FS
FSR
GALV
GB
GR
GS
GS@W
GV
HORIZ
HP
HT
ID
INV
I.O.D.

IRR
LF
LN
LP
JT

MAXIMUM

MAINTENANCE HOLE

MINIMUM
NORTH
NDS INC. (MANUFACTURER)

NOT INCLUDED

NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING

NOT TO SCALE

ON CENTER
OFFSET

ORIGINAL GROUND / GRADE

OVER HEAD ELECTRIC

PAVEMENT

POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE OR

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

PLANTING EASEMENT
PAGE

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE

PROPERTY LINE

PARCEL MAP

POINT OF CONNECTION

POWER POLE

POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE

PROFILE
POINT

PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE

RECLAIMED WATER

RIGHT-OF-WAY
RADIUS

RELATIVE COMPACTION

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RELATIVE DENSITY
ROAD
RETURN

RESISTANCE VALUE

REDUCED PRESSURE

RECYCLED WATER

BACKFLOW PREVENTER

SLOPE OR SOUTH

SETBACK LINE

SOLANO COUNTY

STORM DRAIN

SUB-GRADE
SHEET

SIMILAR

STREET NAME SIGN

REGIONAL SAN

SANITARY SEWER
STREET
STEEL

STATION

STANDARD

SIDEWALK

TOP BACK OF CURB

TOP OF CURB

TRENCH DRAIN

TOP OF DRIVE OVER CURB

TEMPORARY

TOP OF GRATE

THROUGH

TRAFFIC INDEX

TOP OF WALL

TREE PLANTING EASEMENT

TOP OF VERTICAL CURB

TYPICAL

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

VERTICAL

VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE

WATER OR WEST

WATER METER

WATER SERVICE
WAY
WITH
MAX
MH
MIN
N
NDS
NIC
NSE
NTS
OC
OF
OG
OHE

P OR PAV
PCC
P.E.

PG
PG&E
PIV
PL
PM
POC
PP
PRC
PROF
PT
PTDF
PUE
PVC
RW
R/W
R
RC
RCP
R.D.

RD
RET
RV
RP
RW
BP
S
SBL
SC
SD
SG
SHT
SIM
SNS
SRCSD
SS
ST
STL
STA
STD

S/W OR SW
TBC
TC
TD
TDC
TEMP
TG
THRU
TI
TW
TPE
TVC
TYP
UON
VERT
VCP
W
WM
WS
WY
W/

PROPOSEDEXISTING
LEGEND
32 32
106
.
8 2

BOUNDARY LINE

CENTERLINE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

PARCEL LINE

MONUMENT
SAWCUT

CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER

DRAINAGE SWALE

FIRE HYDRANT

FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION (PROPOSED)

ORIGINAL GROUND

DIRECTION OF FLOW

CONTOURS

WALL (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)

FENCE (CHAINLINK OR VINYL)

FENCE (WOOD OR WROUGHT IRON)

TREE OR SHRUB

TREE STUMP
SIGN
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FF=0000.00

3.0%3.0%

PROJECT

LOCATION

AIR BASE PARKWAY
CL
A
Y

B
A
N
K

R
O
A
D
WA
L
T
E
R
S

R
O
A
D
BM
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
SHEET
NUMBER
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.

CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

0 6
/
2 3
/
2 0
2 5

1 4
:
1 8

P
L
O
T
T
E
D

B
Y
:

J
m
c
d
e
r
m
o
t
t
DW
G
N
A
M
E
:

F
:
\
2 4
-
3 5
6 3

I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e

a
t

L
a
g
o

V
i
s
t
a
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
s
\
C
1 .
1 C
V
R
.
d
w
g
C1.1
COPYRIGHT © 2025 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
24-3563
CRW
CRW
JPM
06/23/2025
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
,
IN
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
C
E

I
N

F
A
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

C
I
V
I
L

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N
S

F
O
R
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:

NOT

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
CO
V
E
R

S
H
E
E
T

AS SHOWN

Page 862 of 1141 ends

20' ROA
D

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
50' WA
T
E
R

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
M

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT
EXISTING 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING 50' WETLAND BUFFER

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE
R
3 0
'
R25'
R2
0 '
26'
R4
0 '
R4
0 '
84 '
26'
26'
26'
24'
R10'
R20
'
R2
0 '
R2
0 '
R10'
R2
7 '
R10
'
R1
0 '
R
2 7
'
R20
'
R10
'
R
1 0
'
R
1 0
'
R10'
R
1 0
'
R10'
R
2 0
'
R
2 0
'
R20'
R
2 0
'
R20'
R20
'
R
2 0
'
R
2 0
'
R20'
R
2 0
'
R20'
R
2 0
'
R
6 5
'
A C
5 .
1 A C
5 .
1 B
C5.1
B
C5.1
C
C5.1
D
C5
.
1 E
C5
.
1 F
C5.1
F
C5.1 G
C5.1
G
C5.1
G
C5.1
G
C5.1
G
C5.1
G
C5.1
H
C5.1
H
C5
.
1 H
C5
.
1 H
C5
.
1 H
C5
.
1 H
C5
.
1 H
C5.1

WATER QUALITY BASIN

PER OTHERS
19'(TYP)
9'
(
T
Y
P
)
9'
(
T
Y
P
)
16'(TYP)
9'
(
T
Y
P
)
19'(TYP)

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
AIR B
A
S
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y

EXISTING WETLAND

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT
21 '
18 '
19'
9'

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE
24'
24'
26'
26'
26'
26'
24 '
26'
35'

26.15'
26'
26 '
26 '
26 '
26'
26'
3 5
'
24'
24'
2 6
'
36'
36'
36'
45'
84'
2 6
'
4 2
'
2 6
'
26 '
26 '
26 '
26 '
26 '
84'
26 '
42'
84'
24'
24'
24'
26 '
20'
20'
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
19 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
9'
19'
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
16 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'(TYP)
19'(TYP)
9'(
T
Y
P
)
9'(
T
Y
P
)
16'(TYP)
9 '
(
T
Y
P
)
16'(TYP
)
9 '
(
T
Y
P
)
19'(TYP
)
19'(T
Y
P
)
9 '
(
T
Y
P
)
16'(TY
P
)
9 '
(
T
Y
P
)
19'
9 '
16'(TY
P
)
9 '
(
T
Y
P
)
9'
21 '
9'
19'
9 '
35 '
21'
9'
9'
21'
21'
9 '
9'

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

HATCH LEGEND

EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE

PROPOSED PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE

PROPOSED DECORATIVE PROPOSED DECORATIVE

LANDSCAPE PAVERS CONCRETE PAVERS
NOTE
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ESTIMATED; ULTIMATE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION WILL BE BASED ON DESIGNED BUILDING SLAB THICKNESS.
0 1" =
50 25 50
50'
DI
M
E
N
S
I
O
N

A
N
D

P
A
V
I
N
G

P
L
A
N

AS SHOWN
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
SHEET
NUMBER
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.

CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

0 6
/
2 3
/
2 0
2 5

1 4
:
1 7

P
L
O
T
T
E
D

B
Y
:

J
m
c
d
e
r
m
o
t
t
DW
G
N
A
M
E
:

F
:
\
2 4
-
3 5
6 3

I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e

a
t

L
a
g
o

V
i
s
t
a
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
s
\
C
2 .
1 D
I
M
.
d
w
g
C2.1
COPYRIGHT © 2025 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
24-3563
CRW
CRW
JPM
06/23/2025
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
,
IN
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
C
E

I
N

F
A
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

C
I
V
I
L

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N
S

F
O
R
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:

NOT

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N

Page 863 of 1141 ends

HATCH LEGEND

EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE

PROPOSED PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE

PROPOSED DECORATIVE PROPOSED DECORATIVE

LANDSCAPE PAVERS CONCRETE PAVERS
NOTE
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ESTIMATED; ULTIMATE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION WILL BE BASED ON DESIGNED BUILDING SLAB THICKNESS.
20' ROA
D

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
50' WA
T
E
R

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
M

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT
EXISTING 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING 50' WETLAND BUFFER

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE

WATER QUALITY BASIN

PER OTHERS
FF=51.05*
PAD=50.05
FF=50.80*
PAD=49.80
FF=50.55*
PAD=49.55
FF=50.85*
PAD=49.85
FF=50.65*
PAD=49.65
FF=50.40*
PAD=49.40
FF=50.25*
PAD=49.25
FF=50.00*
PAD=49.00
FF=49.05*
PAD=48.05 FF=49.30*
PAD=48.30
FF=49.00*
PAD=48.00
FF=48.75*
PAD=47.75
FF=48.55*
PAD=47.55
FF=48.80*
PAD=47.80
FF=49.05*
PAD=48.05
FF=49.30*
PAD=48.30
FF=49.55*
PAD=48.55
FF=49.80*
PAD=48.80
FF=50.05*
PAD=49.05
FF=50.25*
PAD=49.25
FF=50.50*
PAD=49.50
FF=50.30*
PAD=49.30
FF=50.45*
PAD=49.45
FF=50.65*
PAD=49.65
FF=50.80*
PAD=49.80
FF=51.05*
PAD=50.05
FF=51.30*
PAD=50.30
FF=51.55*
PAD=50.55
FF=51.65*
PAD=50.65
FF=51.85*
PAD=50.85
FF=52.35*
PAD=51.35
FF=52.20*
PAD=51.20
FF=52.45*
PAD=51.45
FF=52.25*
PAD=51.25
FF=52.00*
PAD=51.00
FF=51.30*
PAD=50.30
FF=51.55*
PAD=50.55
FF=51.45*
PAD=50.45
FF=51.20*
PAD=50.20
FF=51.00*
PAD=50.00
FF=51.25*
PAD=50.25
FF=48.80*
PAD=47.80
FF=49.05*
PAD=48.05
FF=49.30*
PAD=48.30
FF=49.55*
PAD=48.55
FF=49.80*
PAD=48.80
FF=50.05*
PAD=49.05
FF=50.25*
PAD=49.25
FF=50.40*
PAD=49.40
FF=49.90*
PAD=48.90 FF=49.65*
PAD=48.65 FF=49.40*
PAD=48.40 FF=49.15*
PAD=48.15 FF=48.90*
PAD=47.90 FF=48.65*
PAD=47.65 FF=48.40*
PAD=47.40 FF=48.15*
PAD=47.15
FF=48.35*
PAD=47.35
FF=48.60*
PAD=47.60
FF=48.85*
PAD=47.85
FF=49.10*
PAD=48.10
FF=49.35*
PAD=48.35
FF=49.60*
PAD=48.60
FF=49.85*
PAD=48.85
FF=50.10*
PAD=49.10
FF=50.30*
PAD=49.30 FF=50.05*
PAD=49.05 FF=49.80*
PAD=48.80 FF=49.55*
PAD=48.55 FF=49.30*
PAD=48.30 FF=49.05*
PAD=48.05 FF=48.80*
PAD=47.80 FF=48.55*
PAD=47.55
FF=48.55*
PAD=47.55
FF=48.80*
PAD=47.80
FF=49.05*
PAD=48.05
FF=49.30*
PAD=48.30
FF=49.55*
PAD=48.55
FF=49.90*
PAD=48.90
FF=50.15*
PAD=49.15
FF=50.40*
PAD=49.40
FF=50.65*
PAD=49.65
FF=50.85*
PAD=49.85 FF=50.60*
PAD=49.60 FF=50.35*
PAD=49.35 FF=50.10*
PAD=49.10
FF=49.80*
PAD=48.80 FF=49.55*
PAD=48.55 FF=49.30*
PAD=48.30 FF=49.05*
PAD=48.05 FF=48.80*
PAD=47.80
FF=49.35*
PAD=48.35
FF=49.60*
PAD=48.60
FF=49.75*
PAD=48.75
FF=49.50*
PAD=48.50
FF=49.65*
PAD=48.65
FF=49.90*
PAD=48.90
FF=50.75*
PAD=49.75
FF=50.50*
PAD=49.50
FF=50.45*
PAD=49.45
FF=50.70*
PAD=49.70
FF=50.90*
PAD=49.90
FF=51.20*
PAD=50.20
FF=51.40*
PAD=50.40
FF=51.15*
PAD=50.15
FF=50.25*
PAD=49.25
FF=50.50*
PAD=49.50
FF=50.75*
PAD=49.75
FF=51.00*
PAD=50.00
FF=51.40*
PAD=50.40
FF=51.15*
PAD=50.15
FF=50.90*
PAD=49.90

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
FF=51.80*
PAD=50.80
FF=51.80*
PAD=50.80 FF=51.70*
PAD=50.70

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
AIR B
A
S
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y

EXISTING WETLAND

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT
GB
H
P
GB G
B
G
B
GB
HP
HP
GB
GB
GBGB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
H
P
HP
H
P
G
B
GB
G
B
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
HP
HP
HP
HP
GB
GB
GB
GB
HP
HP
HP
GB
GB
HP
GB
GB
GB
GB
SLO
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPES
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOP
E
SLOP
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOP
E
SLOP
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOP
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
FF=51.00*
PAD=50.00

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
GR
A
D
I
N
G

A
N
D

D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E

P
L
A
N

AS SHOWN
0 1" =
50 25 50
50'
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
SHEET
NUMBER
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.

CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

0 6
/
2 3
/
2 0
2 5

1 4
:
1 7

P
L
O
T
T
E
D

B
Y
:

J
m
c
d
e
r
m
o
t
t
DW
G
N
A
M
E
:

F
:
\
2 4
-
3 5
6 3

I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e

a
t

L
a
g
o

V
i
s
t
a
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

I
N

F
A
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

C
I
V
I
L

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N
S

F
O
R
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:

NOT

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N

Page 864 of 1141 ends

LEGEND

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PER OTHERS

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PER OTHERS

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN

PROPOSED WATER PER OTHERS
PROPOSED WATER (COMBINED FIRE + DOMESTIC)

PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE

PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

PROPOSED WATER METER

PROPOSED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW

PREVENTER

PROPOSED WATER VALVE

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT

PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

PROPOSED PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE
WM
BFP
WV
FDC
PIV
M

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT
EXISTING 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING 50' WETLAND BUFFER

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE
S
S
SD
W
W
W
W
S
D
SD
SS SD
SD
SD
SS
SS
SD
S
D
SD

WATER QUALITY BASIN

PER OTHERS
W
M
B
F
P
WM BFP

PIV FDC
PIV
FDC

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

CONNECT TO SEWER LINE

PER OTHERS
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
SS
W
W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
D
S
D
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

BY OTHERS

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
AIR B
A
S
E

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y

EXISTING WETLAND

EXISTING FLOOD EASEMENT

CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN

LINE PER OTHERS

CONNECT TO WATER

LINE PER OTHERS

DISCHARGE TO WATER QUALITY BASIN

CONNECT TO

STORM DRAIN

LINE PER OTHERS

CONNECT TO WATER LINE PER OTHERS

PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
CO
M
P
O
S
I
T
E

U
T
I
L
I
T
Y

P
L
A
N

AS SHOWN
0 1" =
50 25 50
50'
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
SHEET
NUMBER
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.

CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

0 6
/
2 3
/
2 0
2 5

1 4
:
1 5

P
L
O
T
T
E
D

B
Y
:

J
m
c
d
e
r
m
o
t
t
DW
G
N
A
M
E
:

F
:
\
2 4
-
3 5
6 3

I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e

a
t

L
a
g
o

V
i
s
t
a
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

I
N

F
A
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

C
I
V
I
L

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N
S

F
O
R
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:

NOT

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N

Page 865 of 1141 ends

ST
R
E
E
T

C
R
O
S
S

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S

AS SHOWN
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
SHEET
NUMBER
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.

CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

06 /
2 3
/
2 0
2 5

1 4
:
0 6

P
L
O
T
T
E
D

B
Y
:

J
m
c
d
e
r
m
o
t
t
DW
G
N
A
M
E
:

F
:
\
2 4
-
3 5
6 3

I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e

a
t

L
a
g
o

V
i
s
t
a
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
\
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

I
N

F
A
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y

C
I
V
I
L

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N
S

F
O
R
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:

NO
T

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
A NTS

PERIMETER CROSS SECTION
B NTS

PERIMETER CROSS SECTION PERIMETER CROSS SECTIONENTS
D NTS

PERIMETER CROSS SECTION

PERIMETER CROSS SECTIONFNTS
25' WETLAND
BUFFER

PROPOSED

PROPERTY LINE

RETAINING WALL

FENCE PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
2% MAX

PROPOSED
R/W

RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED SIDEWALK

PER OTHERS
STREET SECTION 26'
NTS
GARAGE
26'VARIES
VARIES

PROPOSED PAVEMENT SECTION

GARAGEFCFCVARIES
STREET SECTION 24'G NTS
GARAGE
24'VARIES
VARIES

PROPOSED PAVEMENT SECTION
NOTE:

1. PAVEMENT SLOPES RANGE FROM 1.5% MIN TO 3.5% MAX.

GARAGEFCFCVARIES
H
NOTE:

1. PAVEMENT SLOPES RANGE FROM 1.5% MIN TO 3.5% MAX.

SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING

PER OTHERS

REFER TO PLANS BY OTHERS
3'

M
A
X

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
5'

M
A
X

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G

BUILDING

RETAINING WALL
3'

M
A
X

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
C NTS

PERIMETER CROSS SECTION

PROPOSED

PROPERTY LINE

RETAINING WALL PER OTHERS

FENCE PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
7'

M
A
X

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G

RETAINING WALL
2'

M
A
X

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G

RETAINING WALL
4'

M
A
X

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G

MULTI-FAMILY

BUILDING

VARIES PER PLAN

PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER

PER OTHERS

VARIES PER PLAN VARIES PER PLAN BY OTHERS

PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
MAX 2%

VARIES PER PLAN

REFER TO PLANS BY OTHERS

WATER QUALITY BASIN PER OTHERS

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

REFER TO PLANS BY OTHERS

FOR PERIMETER DRAINAGE

REFER TO PLANS BY OTHERS

FOR PERIMETER DRAINAGE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

VARIES PER PLAN

Page 866 of 1141 ends

1 CEQA Addendum for the Villages at Fairfield Project
(VAF EIR: E.R. 2003-29; 2011 Addendum; 2015 Addendum; 2018 Addendum) (Hawthorne Mill EIR: E.R. 2014-23)
August 2025

1.0 BACKGROUND
The Lago Vista project (herein, “Project” or “proposed Project”) would be removed from the Hawthorne Mill project and added into the Villages at Fairfield project. The evaluation of the proposed Project is therefore subject to both underlying approvals and their respective CEQA certification. See Exhibit X, Project Location and Boundary. This 2025 Addendum has been prepared pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 for the Project, as described below.

The Hawthorne Mill project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified in November 2015 (City Council Resolution No. 2015-246). The Hawthorne Mill EIR analyzed the development of 172 residential units on Hawthorne Mill West (location of the proposed Project) with 825 units planned for Hawthorne Mill East. The approvals proposed for the Hawthorne Mill project and analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR included a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2014-4) changing the land use designations for the Project site from Industrial & Business Park (IBP) to Residential Low-Medium (RLM) and Open Space Conservation (OSC) for the remainder of the site. Also considered and not finalized were a corresponding Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Tentative Subdivision Maps, a Development Review and Community Design Plan, and a Development Agreement.

The Villages at Fairfield EIR was certified in 2005 (City Council Resolution No. 2005-296), and subsequently modified in 2011 and 2015, in consideration of the following actions:

 On September 20, 2005, the Fairfield City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-296 certifying an EIR for the Villages at Fairfield (the “VAF EIR”). As also recommended by the Planning Commission, the City Council approved the following actions:
o General Plan Amendment (Resolution No. 2005-297);
o Zoning Code Amendment (Ordinance 2005-15);
o Tentative Subdivision Map (Resolution 2005-33); and
o Development Agreement for the Villages of Fairfield (Ordinance No. 2005-14).

 On May 3, 2011, the City adopted an Addendum to the EIR in conjunction with its approval of the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (“First Amended DA,” Ordinance 2011-09).

 On August 10, 2015, the City adopted an Addendum to the EIR in conjunction with its approval of the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement (“Second Amended DA,” Ordinance 2015-19). The 2011 and 2015 Addenda analyzed shifts in residential densities and minor land use revisions, all in substantial conformance with the previously approved tentative tract maps (General Plan Amendment, Resolution 2015- 245).

 On January 15, 2019, the City adopted an Addendum to the EIR (Resolution No. 2019-

Page 867 of 1141 ends

2 14) in conjunction with its approval of the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement (“First Amendment to Second Amended DA,” Ordinance 2019-01), which adjusted the timing of certain infrastructure improvements described in Exhibit H of the Second Amended and Restated DA.

2.0 PROJECT MODIFICATIONS

Rancho Tolenas Corporation, a subsidiary of Lewis Group of Companies (herein, “Project Applicant”) has filed applications with the City of Fairfield (herein, “City”) for the Villages at Fairfield (“VAF”) Lago Vista project (herein, “Project” or “Lago Vista”). VAF encompasses approximately 431 acres in the northeastern area of the City of Fairfield, located to the south of Cement Hill and the Putah South Canal, north of Air Base Parkway, east of the Woodlake Estates residential development, and west of the Gold Ridge residential development. VAF is divided into five separate development projects, including four residential projects: Village I, Village II, Village III, and Village IV, and the Laurel Creek Plaza commercial center. The Project would add an additional development area adjacent to Village II referenced as Lago Vista. The Project requires a reallocation of 295 residential units from Villages I and II, which have been developed with fewer units (806) than previously analyzed and approved (1,101), and an additional 80 residential units for a total of 375 units within Lago Vista. The original VAF approval included 2,327 total residential units, and the VAF EIR originally analyzed 1,101 units for Villages I and II and an additional 1,226 units for Villages III and IV. The Hawthorne Mill West project planned to develop 172 residential units on the Lago Vista site. The Project would not amend VAF total units but reallocate the additional 80 units to Lago Vista from the previously analyzed Hawthorne Mill West units that have not yet been developed on the Lago Vista site.

Moreover, as discussed in Transportation below, the traffic generated from development of the 375 units is less than generated from the 1,101 units considered in the VAF EIR for Villages I and II. The impacts for Lago Vista that vary based on intensity of unit count are determined by traffic trips for impacts to transportation, air quality, greenhouse gas, energy and noise. All of these impacts will be less significant since the traffic impacts will be less. The impacts to land are the same as considered in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. The other unit-based impacts such as utilities, recreation and population and housing are addressed by fees, which the Lago Vista will pay more according to having more units contributing. As such, the impacts will be the same or less for Lago Vista compared to what was studied in the VAF EIR.

The Project is comprised of 154.7 acres and planned for 151 single family units designated as Residential Low-Medium, 224 multifamily units designated as Residential High, and 42.2 acres of Public Facility and 75.2 acres of Open Space Conservation. The Project accommodates public and private improvements to support the planned development. See Exhibit X, Lago Vista Illustrative. The Project requires the following modifications and as further described herein:
 General Plan Amendment
 Zone Change
 Vesting Tentative Subdivision/Condominium Map1
 Development Agreement (DA) Second Amendment to the Second Amended DA

1 The proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map includes a Vesting Tentative Map for Condominium Purposes for Lot 3, the proposed multifamily parcel.

Page 868 of 1141 ends

3  Development Review and Community Design Plan, Amended

Land Use and Zoning
The Project requires a General Plan Amendment to redesignate approximately 15.8 acres of the site as Residential High, reducing the amount of Residential Low-Medium designated area by

9.4 acres and reducing the Open Space Conservation designated area by 6.3 acres. See Exhibit X, General Plan Amendment.

The Project requires a Zone Change to redesignate 154.7 acres comprised of Industrial Business Park, Residential Medium, Public Facility and Open Space Conservation to 21.5 acres of Residential Low-Medium, 15.8 acres of Residential High, 42.2 acres of public facility and 75.2 acres of Open Space Conservation. See Exhibit X, Rezone Exhibit.

Circulation
The Project will connect to Village II via Horizon Drive. An Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) point, providing access to Air Base Parkway is proposed in the southwest corner of Lago Vista.

The Project will also include an active transportation link from the northern edge of the residential development and connecting via a multi-use trail and associated open space to the existing Portland Drive. This active use transportation route encompasses approximately 3.8 acres of the Residential Low-Medium and would support pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to Portland Drive that ultimately connects with the Linear Park system.

Infrastructure
Lago Vista will utilize the now-built Village II sewage infrastructure and route sewage to the west to the sewer lift station installed as part of the Villages at Fairfield infrastructure. Other utility connections will be routed to the infrastructure that has already been built or is under construction to serve Village II, with capacity to meet the demands of Lago Vista.

Drainage from the Project would be treated and detained onsite, with the discharge not to exceed 90 percent of the pre-project levels. Stormwater infrastructure, including a stormwater basin, would be located within the southeast corner of the Project site (Lot G). This water quality basin is anticipated to be dedicated to the City and included in the existing lighting and landscaping maintenance district for on-going maintenance. Storm drain connections from the proposed single-family lots (Lot 1 to the west and a portion of Lot 2 to the north) to the Lot G water quality basin will require an easement through the proposed multifamily lot (Lot 3) for access and maintenance. The City (and related agencies) will also have on-going vehicular and maintenance access rights to Lot G and the open space to the east of the Project through Lot 3.

The existing water quality basin next to Lot 3 in Village 2 would also serve the northern third of the Project.

Grading & Construction
Mass grading of the entire Project site is anticipated to commence by the end of 2025, with backbone infrastructure and site improvements commencing in 2026. The single family and multifamily lots (Lots 1, 2, and 3) are proposed to be constructed at the same time.

Regulatory
The Hawthorne Mill Project was also analyzed in an Environmental Impact Statement under the

Page 869 of 1141 ends

4 National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) in conjunction with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) issuance of an individual Clean Water Act Section 404 permit (“404 Permit”) for the project. Accordingly, the original Hawthorne Mill Project was analyzed in a joint EIS/EIR. No 404 Permit is required for the Lago Vista project, so no further review under NEPA is required. The NEPA analysis in the Hawthorne Mill EIR/EIS is not relevant for this Addendum, which is only required to analyze the Lago Vista project under CEQA’s subsequent review provisions.

Development Agreement
The Lago Vista Project will also involve amendments to the Development Agreement, including to add the Lago Vista site to the Project area, modify the parkland dedication requirements, and accelerate the timeline of certain roadway improvements.

3.0 DETERMINATION TO PREPARE AN ADDENDUM

Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if changes or additions are necessary and when none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (which calls for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR) have occurred. Section 15162 requires preparation of a Subsequent EIR when:

“(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions to the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:

(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (B) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.”

Where none of the above-referenced conditions requiring the preparation of a Subsequent EIR exist, the

Page 870 of 1141 ends

5 CEQA Guidelines require a lead agency to prepare an Addendum to the previously certified EIR, including a brief explanation, supported by substantial evidence, of the decision to not prepare a Subsequent EIR (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164(a)).

The “project” at issue for purposes of CEQA’s subsequent review provisions is the residential development of Lago Vista. In this case, all of the environmental impacts associated with Lago Vista have effectively already been analyzed under a certified EIR as either (a) impacts already accounted for in the VAF EIR or (b) site-specific impacts of residential development analyzed under the Hawthorne Mill EIR.

4.0 MITIGATION MEASURES

All mitigation measures identified as part of the VAF EIR and HM EIR would continue to apply to the proposed Project, although many of the mitigation requirements would apply to future implementing developments not specifically applicable to the Project. Where applicable and appropriate, mitigation measures from the Hawthorne Mill EIR are incorporated into this Addendum, ensuring that there are no new or substantially more severe impacts associated with the modifications to the Project. A copy of the combined Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project is provided herein as Exhibit X.

5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

The Project’s modifications to the previously approved development described above result in volume- based impacts such as traffic, air quality, roadway noise, utilities, water supply, and public services that are consistent with the those addressed by the VAF EIR. The footprint of the developed area remains the same or smaller than the development already analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR, so all land-based impacts, such as those related to agriculture, biology, cultural, geology, hydrology, and hazards. remain the same or less significant than those analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR.

Each impact area summarized below analyzes whether the proposed Project will result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts previously identified in the VAF EIR or Hawthorne Mill EIR, as applicable. On the basis of the evaluation below, the City determines that the potentially significant effects that could result from the proposed Lago Vista Project have been addressed in either the certified VAF EIR (and subsequent addenda) or the certified Hawthorne Mill EIR, and that none of the conditions for preparation of a subsequent EIR set forth in the Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have been triggered. Accordingly, an Addendum to the VAF EIR and Hawthorne Mill EIR shall be prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, as set forth below2.

The Project modifications do not cause new or substantially more severe significant impacts than previously analyzed because all of the impacts of the Project have already been analyzed under either the VAF EIR or the Hawthorne Mill EIR with respect to impacts that are specific to the Project area. Therefore, this Addendum is an addendum to both the VAF EIR and the Hawthorne Mill EIR. As documented in this Addendum, (a) the impacts of the Project related to Transportation, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas, Public Facilities & Services, Population & Housing, Recreation, Utilities & Service Systems, and Energy have been sufficiently analyzed by the VAF EIR such that no major revisions to the VAF EIR are required; and (b) the impacts of the Project related to Biological Resources, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources & Tribal

2 Note that the VAF EIR and previous addenda to the VAF EIR followed the organizational structure of the Peabody Walters EIR, which combined certain impact discussions into larger chapters, while the Hawthorne Mill EIR analyzed each CEQA impact area in individual chapters. For clarity, this Addendum is organized by individual impact area but references the previous VAF EIR analysis by its heading in the VAF EIR where applicable.

Page 871 of 1141 ends

6 Cultural Resources, Hydrology & Water Quality, Noise, Geology & Soils, Agriculture & Forestry Resources, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, Land Use & Planning, Mineral Resources, Population & Housing, and Wildfire, have been sufficiently analyzed by the Hawthorne Mill EIR such that no major revisions to the Hawthorne Mill EIR are required. Where applicable, mitigation measures from each previously certified EIR are referenced and incorporated into this Addendum.

A. Aesthetics
The Hawthorne Mill EIR evaluated the potential aesthetics impacts of the development of residential uses and concluded that all impacts associated with development on the Lago Vista site related to aesthetics would be less than significant with the exception of potential impacts related to light and glare that could affect day and nighttime views in the project vicinity. The Hawthorne Mill EIR analyzed residential use on the site, and the Project is proposing residential use with similar standards and massing. As such, there are no meaningful differences between the potential aesthetic impacts of the Project and the previously analyzed Hawthorne Mill West project. Views of the proposed Project development from the surrounding area would be similar to those analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR, and the site itself contains no visual resources.

To address the potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to light and glare, the Hawthorne Mill EIR included MM AES-2, which is incorporated into this Addendum, as adapted to the Project (modifications in strikeout and underline):

MM AES-2: Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each phase of Hawthorne Mill East and Hawthorne Mill WestLago Vista, the applicant shall prepare and submit an outdoor lighting plan (which includes a photometric analysis) to the City of Fairfield that includes a footcandle map illustrating the amount of light from the project site at adjacent light-sensitive receptors. The lighting plan shall provide directional shielding for all exterior lighting; automatic shutoff or motion sensors; and include minimal levels of street lighting.

Environmental Issues

Aesthetic Impacts - Would the
project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
No
Substantial
Change from
Previous VAF
EIR Analysis
No
Substantial
Change from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista? X 
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a
State‐designated scenic
highway?
X 
c) Substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of the site and its
surroundings?
X 

Page 872 of 1141 ends

7 d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
X 

B. Air Quality & Greenhouse Gases

Since most of the units in the Project are being re-allocated from already approved Village I-II units, this Addendum considers them Village I-II units for the purposes of analyzing Air Quality impacts, and the Air Quality analysis in the VAF EIR would apply (see VAF EIR Chapter 7).

The VAF EIR concluded that the VAF project would contribute to an exceedance of Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“BAAQMD”) significance thresholds for certain conventional pollutants and that this impact would be significant and unavoidable. By re- allocating Village I- II units and adding additional units to the adjoining Lago Vista site, there is no change in this conclusion. This impact will remain significant and unavoidable as in the VAF EIR, but the VAF EIR included mitigation measures to reduce air quality impacts to the extent feasible. The Project would be required to comply with all VAF EIR mitigation measures relevant and applicable to Village I-II, ensuring that any air quality impacts would be mitigated to the extent feasible and would be consistent with those analyzed in the VAF EIR. Accordingly, the air quality impacts associated with the Project would not represent new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts and would remain below the Section 15162 thresholds.

Environmental Issues

Air Quality - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
X 
b) Violate an air quality standard or
contribute to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
X 
c) Result in cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is in non‐
attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emission which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
X 
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
X 

Page 873 of 1141 ends

8 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
X 
With respect to GHG impacts associated with the Project, the VAF GHG analysis would also apply. In the 2010 and 2015 Addenda to the VAF EIR, the City concluded that although the 2005 EIR did not evaluate the VAF project’s GHG emissions, the later adoption of AB 32 and BAAQMD GHG thresholds did not constitute new information requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR since those regulatory developments did not reveal new site- specific impacts, and GHG impacts were known or knowable in 2005. As detailed in the Transportation Impact Analysis Memorandum prepared by Wood Rodgers and attached as Appendix B to this Addendum, the as-built Villages I and II plus the Project would result in substantially fewer daily trips than the trip generation for Villages I and II analyzed in the VAF EIR. Since traffic is the primary driver associated with volume-based operational impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions, and the proposed Project units can be accounted for in the VAF trip generation budget, the GHG analysis does not change. No GHG mitigation would be required under the VAF EIR. Nevertheless, as a matter of regulatory compliance, the Project is required to comply with current Title 24 energy efficiency standards, therefore, the Project units will be more energy- and GHG-efficient than the units originally analyzed in the VAF EIR. The Project units will also be solar-ready. Accordingly, the GHG impacts associated with the Project would not represent new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts and would remain below the Section 15162 thresholds.

Environmental Issues

Greenhouse Gas Impacts- Would the
project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment?
X 
b) Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
X 

C. Biological Resources
Potential impacts to biological resources related to development on the Project site were thoroughly analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. Existing conditions on the Lago Vista site have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified. The proposed Project development footprint has been designed to avoid potentially jurisdictional features in the areas near McCoy Basin, and, as such, will entirely avoid wetland impacts. As a result, the Project will greatly reduce impacts to biological resources compared to Hawthorne Mill West, which

Page 874 of 1141 ends

9 assumed fill of 0.30 acres of wetlands, with indirect impacts to 0.82 acres of wetlands.

Hawthorne Mill West also assumed indirectly impacted 0.66 acres of Contra Costa Goldfields habitat, as well as direct and indirect impacts to 1.21 acres of pappose tarplant, due to the extension of Portland Drive. The proposed Project would indirectly impact 0.06 acres of Contra Costa goldfields and result in direct and indirect impacts to 0.43 acres of pappose tarplant. The proposed Project would also affect approximately 759 square feet (0.01 acre) of bearded popcornflower. The Hawthorne Mill EIR incorrectly assumed the bearded popcornflower was absent. Recent plant surveys confirmed that 0.01 acre of bearded popcornflower is located within the Hawthorne Mill West area. The bearded popcornflower occupies similar habitat as the pappose tarplant. As a result, the total amount of impacted special-status plant habitat is

0.50 acres, which is less than the 1.21 acres that would have been impacted by Hawthorne Mill West (See EIR Addendum Biological Summary Memorandum prepared by WRA, Inc., attached as Appendix A).

Based on these findings, the proposed Project will substantially reduce impacts to sensitive plant species as compared to Hawthorne Mill West, and impacts to these resources will be less than what was proposed for Hawthorne Mill West. This Addendum incorporates the relevant mitigation measures for special-status plant species from the Hawthorne Mill EIR. The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that all impacts to biological resources associated with the Hawthorne Mill West project would be less than significant with mitigation. Since all biological impacts of the proposed Project are less than those proposed for Hawthorne Mill West, there is no change to this conclusion, and in fact less mitigation is required with reduced impacts.

For some biological resources, principally including raptor foraging habitat, impacts will be similar between Hawthorne Mill West and the Project since they would both develop approximately the same amount of vacant land that currently provides foraging habitat. For those impacts, this Addendum incorporates the relevant mitigation measures from the Hawthorne Mill EIR, ensuring that those impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the Hawthorne Mill EIR. While the VAF EIR includes a project-wide mitigation measure for impacts to Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat requiring compensatory mitigation at a ratio of

0.5:1, the Project will implement the more conservative ratios (0.75:1 to 1:1) consistent with the Hawthorne Mill EIR.

On October 15, 2024, burrowing owl was listed as a state candidate species by the California Fish and Game Commission. During the listing review process, burrowing owl will be temporarily afforded the same protections as state-listed species throughout the entirety of California. Impacts to burrowing owl were evaluated in the Hawthorne Mill EIR, and, as discussed in greater detail below, mitigation was included that requires protocol-level wintering and nesting season surveys prior to the initiation of construction, pre-construction burrowing owl survey no more than 30 days prior to the first ground-disturbing activity, and avoidance measures pursuant to CDFW guidelines in the event owls are found on-site or within 600 meters of a development area.

To address the potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to biological resources, the Hawthorne Mill EIR included various mitigation measures.3 As noted above, the

3 Note that numerous mitigation measures in the Hawthorne Mill EIR applied solely to the Hawthorne Mill East site and are not relevant to this Addendum.

Page 875 of 1141 ends

10 proposed Project will avoid most of the biological impacts analyzed and mitigated in the Hawthorne Mill EIR, so only certain biological resource mitigation measures from the Hawthorne Mill EIR remain relevant and applicable to the Project. The following Hawthorne Mill EIR mitigation measures remain applicable and are incorporated into this Addendum, as adapted to the Project (modifications in strikeout and underline):

MM BIO-1b: To mitigate indirect effects to 0.606 acre of occupied Contra Costa goldfields (CCG) habitat within the HMW Lago Vista Ddevelopment Aarea, 0.606 acre of CCG preservation credits shall be purchased from an approved, off-site mitigation bank. To compensate for direct and indirect impacts to pappose tarplant (0.43 acre0.33 acre and 0.88 acre, respectively) and bearded popcornflower (0.01 acre), 0.441.21 acres of pappose tarplant and bearded popcornflower preservation credits shall be purchased from an approved, off-site mitigation bank. Proof of purchase of preservation credits or suitable land protection mechanism shall be provided prior to issuance of mass grading permits for Lago VistaHMW.

MM BIO-1e: If an active Swainson’s hawk nest tree occurs within 1 mile of HMW Lago Vista development area, 1.0 acre of habitat management land shall be provided for each acre of foraging habitat developed or removed within 1 mile of the active nest (1:1 ratio).

If an active Swainson’s hawk nest tree located within 5 miles but greater than 1 mile of the HMW Lago Vista development, 0.75 acre of habitat management lands shall be provided for each acre developed (0.75:1 ratio) through fee title acquisition or conservation easement on agricultural lands, or other suitable lands that provide foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk.

Currently, aAll lands within the Lago VistaHMW development area occur greater than 1 mile and less than 2.5 miles from a recently active (within the last 5 years) Swainson’s hawk nest (WRA 2025CDFW 2013). To mitigate for the loss of 31.1 acres of suitable foraging habitat within the Lago Vista HMW development area, 24.3523.33 acres shall be purchased at an approved off-site mitigation bank or permanently preserved. Since the mitigation bank or permanent preservation will involve have existing habitats, there will be no temporal loss or uncertainty regarding successful compensation. Therefore, purchase of mitigation bank credits or permanent preservation at a 0.75:1 compensation- to-impact ratio should meet agency objectives.

In addition, prior to the onset of activities, pre-construction surveys shall be performed in suitable habitats located within 0.5 mile of the HMW Lago Vista development area during the nesting season (April 1 through September 30). If Swainson’s hawks are found nesting within this limit, activities shall be postponed until young have fledged or a reduced, no-disturbance setback is approved through consultation with CDFW or determined by a qualified biologist.

MM BIO-1f: Protocol-level wintering and nesting season surveys for burrowing owl will be conducted prior to the initiation of construction. Additionally, no more than 30 days prior to the first ground-disturbing activity within HME and HMW Lago Vista development areas, pre-construction burrowing owl surveys shall be performed for the Project area. If owls are found on-site in or within 600 meters of a development area, mitigation guidelines adopted in the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be followed (CDFG 2012) or updated guidance in accordance with applicable

Page 876 of 1141 ends

11 regulations at the time of project construction. Measures may include the implementation of appropriate nest buffer areas that shall be avoided during construction, as well as establishment of alternate burrow for any burrows directly impacted and conservation of foraging habitat in the Conservation Area, which shall be restored and conserved via conservation easement or fee title acquisition.

MM BIO-1h: When feasible, construction activities and vegetation removal for HMW Lago Vista development areas shall be done outside of the raptor breeding season (January 1 through August 31). If work must be conducted during the breeding season, a pre-construction survey for nesting raptors with potential to occur in the Project Area shall be performed by a qualified biologist within 14 days of the onset of activities in and within 500 feet of the Project Area. If an active nest is found, a 500-foot buffer shall be placed around the active nest until all young have fledged, or the nest has been naturally predated or abandoned. The buffer size may be reduced by a qualified biologist with approval from CDFW based on proximity and nature of the activity to the nest. To mitigate for the loss of 31.1 acres of suitable raptor foraging habitat within the HMW Lago Vista development area, 31.1 acres shall be purchased at an approved off-site mitigation bank or permanently preserved resulting in a 1:1 ratio of mitigated-to- impacted habitat for foraging raptors.

MM-BIO-1i: When feasible, construction activities and vegetation removal for HME and HMW will be done outside of the bird breeding season (January 1 through August 15). If work must be conducted during the breeding season, then a pre-construction survey for nesting birds, including grasshopper sparrow, loggerhead shrike, and other migratory bird species with potential to occur in the Project Area, shall be performed by a qualified biologist within 14 days of the onset of activities in and within 250 feet of the Project Area. If an active nest is found, a 250-foot buffer shall be established around the nest.

The buffer size may be reduced by a qualified biologist with approval from CDFW, based on site conditions and the nature of the activity. The buffer shall be maintained until all young have fledged, or the nest has been naturally predated and abandoned.

Environmental Issues

Biological Resources - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X 

Page 877 of 1141 ends

12 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, and
regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X 
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
X 
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
X 
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances related to protecting
biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
X 
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional,
or state habitat conservation plan?
X 

Page 878 of 1141 ends

13 D. Cultural Resources (including Tribal Cultural Resources) The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to cultural resources would be less-than-significant with mitigation. Existing conditions on the Project site have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified, and the potential cultural resources impacts of the Project development area are substantially similar to those analyzed and mitigated in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. The following Hawthorne Mill EIR mitigation measures remain applicable and are incorporated into this Addendum, as adapted to the Project (modifications in strikeout and underline):

MM CUL-1: If potentially significant historic resources are encountered during subsurface excavation activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the resource shall cease until a qualified archaeologist determines whether the resource requires further study. The City and/or the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2 shall require that the applicant include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and/or California Environmental Quality Act criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to glass, cans, brick, stone, bone, and wood, or features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites.

If the resource is determined to be significant under Section 106 or CEQA, the City and/or the USACE and a qualified archaeologist shall determine whether preservation in place is feasible. Such preservation in place is the preferred mitigation, if feasible. If such preservation is not feasible, the archaeologist shall prepare and implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan for the resource. The archaeologist shall also conduct appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensive written report and file it with the appropriate information center (California Historical Resources Regional Information Center), and provide for the permanent curation of the recovered materials.

MM CUL-2: If potentially significant archaeological resources are encountered during subsurface excavation activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the resource shall cease until a qualified archaeologist determines whether the resource requires further study. The City and/or the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) shall require that the applicant include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation forms and evaluated for significance in terms of California Environmental Quality Act criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts, or features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites.

If the resource is determined to be significant under CEQA, the City and/or the USACE

2 As noted above, the City is preparing this Addendum under CEQA’s subsequent review provisions, and the previous NEPA EIS prepared for the Hawthorne Mill Project is not relevant since the Project does not require a 404 Permit. Accordingly, references to USACE in Hawthorne Mill mitigation measures are deleted for purposes of their incorporation into this Addendum.

Page 879 of 1141 ends

14 and a qualified archaeologist shall determine whether preservation in place is feasible.

Such preservation in place is the preferred mitigation. If such preservation is infeasible, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan for the resource. The archaeologist shall also conduct appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensive written report and file it with the appropriate information center (California Historical Resources Information System), and provide for the permanent curation of the recovered materials.

MM CUL-3: In the event that plant or animal fossils are discovered during subsurface excavation activities for the proposed project, all excavation within 100 feet of the fossil shall cease until a qualified paleontologist has determined the significance of the find and provides recommendations in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The paleontologist shall notify the City of Fairfield and/or the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine procedures to be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the find is determined to be significant and the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall design and implement a data recovery plan consistent with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The plan shall be submitted to the City and/or the USACE for review and approval. Upon approval, the plan shall be incorporated into the project.

MM CUL-4: If human remains are encountered during earth- disturbing activities for the project, all work in the adjacent area shall stop immediately and the Solano County Coroner's office shall be notified. If the coroner determines the remains are Native American, the coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendant (MDL) of the deceased Native American. The MDL may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

Environmental Issues

Cultural Resources – Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical
resource as defined in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5?
X 
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5?
X 

Page 880 of 1141 ends

15 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geological feature?
X 
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
X 
Specifically, regarding Tribal Cultural Resources, the Hawthorne Mill EIR analyzed potential impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources under the Cultural Resources impact category. Since the certification of the Hawthorne Mill EIR, Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) added various provisions to the California Public Resources Code (PRC) that concern Tribal Cultural Resources, including § 21080.3.1(d). The adoption of AB 52 established the tribal cultural resources environmental factor and related thresholds for Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. On July 30, 2016, the California Natural Resources Agency adopted the final text for the tribal cultural resources update to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, which was approved by the Office of Administrative Law on September 27, 2016. The addition of Tribal Cultural Resources as a separate category from Cultural Resources does not constitute new information requiring a revision to the Hawthorne Mill EIR. Moreover, the requirements of PRC Section 21080.3.1 only apply to the preparation of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or EIR; they do not apply to project revisions that do not trigger subsequent environmental review pursuant to Section 21084 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and require only an addendum under CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. See PRC § 21080.3.1(b).

Environmental Issues

Tribal Cultural Resources - Would the
project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural
resource that is listed or eligible for
listing in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code
section 5020.1(k)?
X 
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural
resource that is a resource determined
by the lead agency, in its discretion
and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native
American tribe?
X 

Page 881 of 1141 ends

16 E. Geology & Soils
The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to geology and soils would be less-than-significant with mitigation. Existing conditions on the Project development area have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified, and the potential geology and soils-related impacts of the Project are substantially similar to those analyzed and mitigated in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. The following Hawthorne Mill EIR mitigation measure remains applicable and is incorporated into this Addendum:

MM GEO-1: Prior to issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit a design-level geotechnical study and building plans to the City of Fairfield for review and approval. The building plans shall incorporate all applicable recommendations of the design-level geotechnical study and comply with all applicable requirements of the most recent version of the California Building Standards Code. A licensed professional engineer shall prepare the plans, including those that pertain to soil engineering, structural foundations, pipeline excavation, and installation. The approved plans shall be incorporated into the proposed project. All onsite soil engineering activities shall be conducted under the supervision of a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or Certified Engineering Geologist.

Environmental Issues

Geology and Soils - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Expose persons or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:

i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
as delineated on the most recent
Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42

ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?

iii. Seismic‐related ground failure,
including liquefaction?

iv. Landslides?
X 

Page 882 of 1141 ends

17 b) Result in substantial erosion or loss of
topsoil?
X 
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on‐ or off‐site
landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
X 
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18‐1‐B of the
Uniform Building Code, creating
substantial risks to life or property?
X 
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewer is not available
for the disposal of waste water?
X 

F. Hazards & Hazardous Materials
The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to hazards and hazardous materials would be less-than-significant. Existing conditions on the Project development area have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified, and the potential impacts of the Project related to hazards and hazardous materials are substantially similar to those analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. No mitigation was required in the Hawthorne Mill EIR.

Environmental Issues

Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Would
the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
X 
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
likely release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
X 
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one‐quarter mile of an existing or
X 

Page 883 of 1141 ends

18 proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and as a result,
would create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
X 
e) Be located within an airport land use
plan, or where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project
area?
X 
f) Be located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working
in the project area?
X 
g) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
X 
h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands?
X 

G. Hydrology & Water Quality
Potential impacts to hydrology and water quality related to development on the Project site were thoroughly analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. Existing conditions on the Project development area have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified. The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that all impacts to hydrology and water quality associated with the Hawthorne Mill West project would be less than significant with mitigation.

Hydrology and water quality impacts will be similar between Hawthorne Mill West and the Project. For example, potential stormwater impacts of the Lago Vista project will be substantially similar to those analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR since the amount of impervious surface area created by the project will be substantially similar to what was proposed and analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. Potential flood risks are identical between the proposed Project and the previously proposed Hawthorne Mill West project. For those impacts, this Addendum incorporates the relevant mitigation measures from the Hawthorne Mill EIR, ensuring that those impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the Hawthorne Mill EIR.

Page 884 of 1141 ends

19 To address the potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to hydrology and water quality resources, the Hawthorne Mill EIR included various mitigation measures.3 The following Hawthorne Mill EIR mitigation measures remain applicable and are incorporated into this Addendum, as adapted to the Project (modifications in strikeout and underline):

MM HYD-la: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for either the Hawthorne Mill East Project or Hawthorne Mill West Project the Lago Vista project, the project applicant shall retain a Qualified SWPPP Developer to prepare and submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City of Fairfield that identifies specific actions and maps Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent stormwater pollution during construction activities for the relevant project.

The SWPPP shall identify a practical sequence for BMP implementation and maintenance, site restoration, monitoring locations and plan, contingency measures, responsible parties, and agency contacts. The SWPPP may include but not be limited to the following elements:
o The use of erosion and sediment-control BMPs, including construction techniques that will reduce the potential for runoff as well as other measures to be implemented during construction. These may include but not be limited to sedimentation ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams and silt fences;
o The means of waste disposal;
o The implementation of approved local plans, non-stormwater management controls, permanent post-construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities;
o The pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and non-stormwater discharges, and other types of materials used for equipment operation;
o Spill prevention and contingency measures, including measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills; o Personnel training requirements and procedures that will be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP; and
o The appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP.

MM HYD-2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for the proposed project, the project applicant shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) to the City of Fairfield for review and approval that complies with the applicable provisions of the Municipal Regional Permit. The plan shall include a detailed drainage plan and identify location, size, and type of pollution prevention measures to prevent polluted stormwater runoff from leaving the developed areas within the project site. If

3 Note that numerous mitigation measures in the Hawthorne Mill EIR applied solely to the Hawthorne Mill East site and are not relevant to this Addendum.

Page 885 of 1141 ends

20 stormwater basins and biofiltration swales are proposed, the SWMP shall include details showing soil media type and thickness, underdrain structures to facilitate adequate infiltration, and outlet protection measures to minimize erosion. The SWMP shall also address the McCoy Creek capacity with regard to spillover from the proposed 8.0-acre-foot stormwater basin. The approved measures shall be incorporated into the proposed project. Examples of additional stormwater pollution prevention measures and practices to be incorporated into the plan include but are not limited to:
o Strategically placed landscaped areas that promote percolation of runoff o Pervious pavement
o Low impact development
o Roof drains that discharge to landscaped areas
o Trash enclosures with screen walls and roofs
o Stenciling on storm drains
o Curb cuts in parking areas to allow runoff to enter landscaped areas o Rock-lined areas along landscaped areas in parking lots o Catch basins
o Oil/water separators
o Regular sweeping of parking areas and cleaning of storm drainage facilities o Employee training to inform maintenance personnel of stormwater pollution prevention measures o Minimization measures
o Long-term operations and maintenance

MM HYD-4: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the proposed project, the project applicant shall submit a Storm Water Management Plan to include a detailed drainage plan, to the City of Fairfield for review and approval. The drainage plan component shall identify all expected flows from and through the project area, and it shall identify the location, size, and type of facilities used to detain and reduce peak flows to 90 percent of pre-project conditions consistent with City of Fairfield requirements. The approved drainage plan shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

MM HYD-5: Prior to issuance of grading permits for the Hawthorne Mill West Lago Vista project, for any structures located within the 100-year floodplain, the applicant must submit a detailed and engineer-stamped Flood Analysis and Design Report to the City of Fairfield and to FEMA for review and approval. The Flood Analysis and Design Report shall demonstrate that all structures have a finished floor elevation of at least 1 foot above the 100-year flood elevation. The approved Flood Analysis and Design Report shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Page 886 of 1141 ends

21 Environmental Issues

Hydrology and Water Quality - Would the
project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements?
X 
b) Substantially deplete
groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net
deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering
of the local groundwater table level
(e.g., the production rate of pre‐
existing nearby wells would drop to a
level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
X 
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or
off‐site?
X 
d) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on‐ or
off‐site?
X 
e) Create or contribute runoff
water, which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
X 
f) Otherwise substantially
degrade water quality?
X 
g) Place housing/structures within
a 100‐year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
X 

Page 887 of 1141 ends

22 h) Place within a 100‐year flood
hazard area structures which would
impede or redirect flood flows?
X 
i) Expose people or structures to
a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
X 
j) Result in inundation by seiche,
tsunami or mudflow?
X 

H. Land Use & Planning
The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to land use and planning would be less-than-significant. Existing conditions on the Project site, and neighboring land uses have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified, and the potential impacts of the Project related to land use and planning are substantially similar to those analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. The proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment to redesignate approximately 15.8 acres of the site as Residential High, which would reduce the area designated Residential Low Medium by approximately 9.4 acres and the area designated Open Space Conservation (OSC) by approximately 6.2 acres. The proposed Project also includes a Zoning Amendment to rezone the

37.2-acre Project area consistent with the area’s General Plan land use designations. Because the Project involves a zone change, it will be reviewed by the Solano County Airport Land Use Commission.

Environmental Issues

Land Use - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Physically divide an established
community?
X 
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to
the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
X 
mitigating an environmental effect?

Page 888 of 1141 ends

23 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
X 

I. Noise
The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to noise would be less-than-significant with mitigation. Existing conditions on the Project development area and neighboring land uses have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified. The same conclusions in the Hawthorne Mill EIR related to construction noise, vibration, and exposure of future residents to sources of noise apply to the proposed Lago Vista project as the proposed land uses and location of those land uses is substantially similar to what was proposed for Hawthorne Mill West. The primary source of noise exposure for Lago Vista is Air Base Parkway, and the Hawthorne Mill EIR included mitigation measures to address potential impacts of Air Base Parkway noise on future residents. The Hawthorne Mill EIR also included standard mitigation measures to address the potential impacts of construction noise on nearby receptors. The following Hawthorne Mill EIR mitigation measures remain applicable to the Project4 and are incorporated into this Addendum, as adapted to the Lago Vista project (modifications in strikeout and underline):

MM NOl-1: The project applicant shall require construction contractors to adhere to the following noise attenuation requirements:
o Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. o All construction equipment shall use noise-reduction features (e.g., mufflers and engine shrouds) that are no less effective than those originally installed by the manufacturer. o Construction staging and heavy equipment maintenance activities shall be performed a minimum distance of 300 feet from the nearest offsite residential building, unless safety or technical factors take precedence.
o Stationary combustion equipment such as pumps or generators operating within 300 feet of any offsite residential building shall be shielded with a noise protection barrier.

MM NOl-4a: The project applicant shall construct a 7-foot-high sound wall along the Hawthorne Mill West Lago Vista residential lot inspection lines contiguous with Air Base Parkway. To control flanking noise, the sound wall shall extend the length of the first lot at each driveway. The sound wall shall be constructed free of any decorative cutouts or openings. Exhibit 3.10 2 provides the proposed locations of the sound walls.

MM NOl-4c: The project applicant shall provide a “windows closed” condition for all Hawthorne Mill East and Hawthorne Mill West Lago Vista residential units. A “windows closed” condition requires a means of mechanical ventilation pursuant to California Building Code standards. This shall be achieved with standard air conditioning or a fresh air intake

4 Note that numerous mitigation measures in the Hawthorne Mill EIR applied solely to the Hawthorne Mill East site and are not relevant to this Addendum.

Page 889 of 1141 ends

24 system.

MM NOl-4d: The project applicant shall require that all Hawthorne Mill East and Hawthorne Mill West Lago Vista residential windows and glass doors that are located within 200 feet of the centerline of Cement Hill Road or Air Base Parkway shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 28.

MM NOl-4e: The project applicant shall require that all Hawthorne Mill East and Hawthorne Mill West Lago Vista residential windows and glass doors that are located within 1,500 feet of the centerline of the UPRR tracks shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 28.

The only project source of potentially increased ambient noise in the vicinity of the Lago Vista Project (impact threshold (c)) is noise generated by vehicle trips. The number of vehicle trips generated by the project is driven by the number of residential units. The Project trips would not exceed the trips generated by Villages I and II as studied in the VAF EIR. The combined Villages I and II and Lago Vista would generate 2,682 fewer daily trips, 32 fewer AM peak hour trips, and 239 fewer PM peak hour trips than the VAF EIR trip generation budget, and all of those vehicle trips will be routed through Village II, so it is appropriate to analyze noise impacts associated with Project trip generation as VAF impacts under the VAF EIR. The daily trips generated internal to Villages I and II under the VAF EIR are greater than now proposed, just as the noise generated by daily trips under the VAF EIR are greater than now proposed. The VAF EIR analyzed traffic noise associated with the Project, including Village I-II, and concluded that those impacts would be less-than-significant with mitigation. Also, those mitigation measures include the construction of barrier walls along Cement Hill Road and Clay Bank Road and apply to the entire VAF Project. Those mitigation measures will continue to apply to the entire VAF Project, including Lago Vista, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Environmental Issues
Noise - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Result in the exposure of persons to or
generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
X 
b) Result in the exposure of persons to or
generation of, excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
X 
c) Result in a substantial permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
X 

Page 890 of 1141 ends

25 d) Result in a substantial temporary or
periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
X 
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
X 
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise
levels?
X 

J. Population & Housing
The potential impacts of the Project related to population and housing are driven by the number of residential units and associated population. As discussed in the project description above, most of the residential units in the Project are being re-allocated from already- entitled units in Villages I-II, so it is appropriate to analyze impacts associated with the Project with respect to population and housing as VAF impacts under the VAF EIR. These impacts were analyzed in VAF EIR Chapter 3 (Land Use and Housing and Population), and determined to be less than significant.5 As concluded in the VAF EIR, the total future housing and residential population are consistent with the housing and population growth allocated to the VAF project area and considered in the PWMP and the City’s General Plan. The re-allocation of 295 units from Village I-II and the addition of 80 units previously analyzed for the Lago Vista site in the Hawthorne Mill EIR will not change the VAF-wide total number of units originally studied in the VAF EIR (2,327 units), so there are no changes to impact conclusions related to Housing and Population.

In addition, the Hawthorne Mill EIR evaluated the potential impacts associated with up to 1,000 residential units, including 172 units on the Hawthorne Mill West site. The Hawthorne Mill EIR determined that new housing associated with the project would contribute to the City’s regional housing supply and help fulfill the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation obligations. The Hawthorne Mill EIR also found that the extension of urban infrastructure to the project site would not represent the removal of a physical barrier to urban growth, because areas on all four sides of the project site currently support or are planned to support urban development and are served or would be served by infrastructure. Accordingly, the Hawthorne Mill EIR determined the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth, either directly or indirectly, and impacts would be less than significant.

5 Potential Project impacts related to Land Use and Planning are addressed above and are compared to Hawthorne Mill West impacts since they are specific to the Project site.

Page 891 of 1141 ends

26 Accordingly, the Project remains consistent with the conclusions in the VAF EIR and Hawthorne Mill EIR and no revisions are required.

Environmental Issues
Population - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Induce substantial population growth
in an area, either directly or indirectly?
X X 
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
X X 
c) Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere?
X X 

K. Public Facilities & Services
The potential impacts of the Project related to public services and facilities are driven by the number of residential units and associated population. As discussed in the project description above, most of the residential units in the Project are being re-allocated from already-entitled units in Villages I-II, so it is appropriate to analyze impacts associated with the Project with respect to public facilities and services as VAF impacts under the VAF EIR. These impacts were analyzed in VAF EIR Chapter 5 (Public Facilities and Services). The VAF EIR concluded that impacts associated with the originally-entitled 2,327 units would be less-than-significant with mitigation. Since the Project units will not change the VAF-wide total of 2,327 units originally analyzed in the VAF EIR, the impacts conclusions in the VAF EIR remain unchanged with the addition of the Project. VAF mitigation measures related to Public Facilities and Services would continue to apply to the entire VAF Project, including Lago Vista. Mitigation measures include the payment of public facilities impact fees that new development within the City must pay before issuance of a building permit. Payment of fees would offset potential increases in service requests and impacts associated with public services would remain less than significant with mitigation.

Page 892 of 1141 ends

27 Environmental Issues

Public Services - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives
for: fire protection, police protection,
schools, parks, and other public
facilities?
X 

L. Recreation
With respect to the Recreation impact threshold (a), the increase in demand for neighborhood and regional parks associated with the Project is driven by the number of residential units and associated population. As discussed in the project description above, most of the residential units in the Project are being re-allocated from already-entitled units in Villages I-II, so it is appropriate to analyze this impact as a VAF impact under the VAF EIR. The VAF EIR did not specifically address Recreation, but it analyzed the Project’s potential impacts related to Park Facilities in Chapter 5 (Public Utilities and Services). The VAF EIR concluded that the Project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to Park Facilities with the implementation of Mitigation Measures PF-20, 21, 22, and 23, which will apply to the Project and which require improvement of the Linear Park adjacent to Villages I, II and III and neighborhood-serving parks in Villages I, II and III, along with payment of development impact fees to fund park improvements.

VAF, including Lago Vista, will be served by the existing Laurel Creek Community Park, and the continued development of the Linear Park system which runs along and adjacent to the entire VAF master planned community, allowing for pedestrian and bicycle mobility from Clay Bank Road to Peabody Road. The Project will have access to an additional 14.2 acres of parkland within the VAF master planned community (including 5.5 acres in Village I, 0.7 acre in Village II, and 8.0 acres planned for Village III) and 11.1 acres of nearby linear parkway.

The Project includes an active transportation link from the northern edge of the residential development and connecting via a multi-use trail to the existing Portland Drive, creating connectivity between Lago Vista and the Linear Park. The total amount of active use trail and open space in Lago Vista will be 6.1 acres.

With respect to Recreation impact threshold (b), the potential impacts of the Project would be specific to the Project development area and therefore should be compared to the impacts of the

Page 893 of 1141 ends

28 Hawthorne Mill West project analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that recreation facilities to be constructed as part of the project, such as trails and neighborhood open space, would not result in any impacts not already addressed elsewhere in the EIR (e.g., noise impacts or air quality impacts of construction) and that no further mitigation was required. The Lago Vista project would involve substantially similar development of recreation facilities such as trails and parklets and is consistent with the conclusions in the Hawthorne Mill EIR for Recreation impact threshold (b).

Environmental Issues
Recreation - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
X 
b) Include recreational facilities or
require the construction, or
expansion of recreational facilities,
which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
X 

M. Transportation
As discussed in the project description above, most of the residential units in the Project are being re-allocated from already-entitled units in Villages I-II, which have been developed with fewer units than previously analyzed and approved, so it is appropriate to analyze potential Transportation impacts of the Project as VAF impacts under the VAF EIR. Also, Project trips would be routed through Village II. As discussed in the Transportation Impact Analysis Memorandum prepared by Wood Rodgers and attached to this Addendum as Appendix B, the Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local roadway connections to Golden Way and High Line Drive. The Project would eliminate the Portland Drive extension that the Hawthorne Mill Project had proposed and solely connect via Village II, which reduces the wetland and biological resource impacts that would have been caused by the Portland Drive roadway connection. Accordingly, any traffic that was assumed to go north from Hawthorne Mill West to Manuel Campos Parkway via Portland Drive would now be routed west to Clay Bank Road via Village II’s internal streets, so all trips generated by the Project would be indistinguishable from other VAF trips.

As discussed in the Transportation Impact Analysis Memorandum, the new residential streets would typically be 40 to 46 feet wide, including 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street, 8- foot parking lanes on one or both sides of the street, and 10-to-12-foot travel lanes (one lane in each direction). Private Street connections for the condominiums would be gated. The private

Page 894 of 1141 ends

29 streets would typically be approximately 26 to 40 feet wide, including one travel lane in each direction, and in some cases, parking and/or a sidewalk on one side of the street.

The Transportation Impact Analysis Memorandum attached as Appendix B compares the trip generation of the proposed Project with the trip generation analyzed in the VAF EIR to confirm that the Project will not result in new or substantially more severe impacts than those analyzed and mitigated in the VAF EIR. Table 1 shows the approved trip generation for Villages I-II from the VAF EIR.

Table 1: VAF EIR Residential Trip Generation – Villages I and II

Development Land Uses Description Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out
Village I Residential 204 Low-Med
Density Units, 628
High Density Units
6,115 473 89 384 596 393 203
Village II Residential/
Mixed Use
270 Low-Med
Density Units, 24.3
Acres Mixed-Use
6,978 308 115 193 656 359 297
EIR Approved Villages I-II Residential Total 13,093 781 204 577 1,252 752 500 Source: VAF EIR Table 4-6 and Appendix 3: Traffic Analysis for the Villages at Fairfield (TKJM, February 4, 2005), Tables IX and X (based on rates found in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition).

As noted in the project description, the final maps ultimately approved for Villages I and II included 432 single-family units in Village I and 374 single-family units in Village II, a total of 806 units, 295 less than the originally approved Village I-II total, and no mixed-use area. Table 2 shows the trip generation for the actual built-out Village I-II units.

Table 2: Final Build-Out Trip Generation – Villages I and II

Land Use
Category
Units Quantity Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out
Village I –
Single-
Family
Detached
Housing
DU 432 3,878 282 71 211 393 248 145
Village II –
Single-
Family
Detached
Housing
DU 374 3,396 247 62 185 343 216 127

Page 895 of 1141 ends

30 Total 7,274 529 133 396 736 464 272
Notes: Trip rates based on fitted curve equations for the proposed land use consistent with information contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition
Table 3 shows the trip generation for the proposed Lago Vista project:

Table 3: Project Trip Generation – Lago Vista

Land Use Category Units Quantity Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out
Lago Vista Project,–
151 Single-Family
Detached Housing; 224
Single-Family
Attached (Duplex)
Housing
DU 375 3,130 219 55 164 276 169 107
Notes: Trip rates based on fitted curve equations for the proposed land use consistent with information contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition

As detailed in Appendix B and the tables above, the addition of Project daily trips to the built-out conditions of Villages I-II including Lago Vista results in a total of 10,404 trips, 2,689 fewer than the 13,093 originally studied and approved in the VAF EIR. Accordingly, the trips generated by the Project site would not exceed the trips generated by Villages I and II and mitigated in the VAF EIR, which included significant improvements to Clay Bank Road and other intersections in the area. The Transportation & Circulation mitigation measures in the VAF EIR would apply to the Project, and the Project units would count towards any of the unit count- based triggers in the VAF EIR. For example, VAF MM-TC-4 provides: “Improve the A.M. peak hour performance of the Clay Bank Road/Cement Hill Road (S) intersection (study intersection 11) … prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 1,948th unit constructed by Lewis Planned Communities.” MM-TC-5 provides: “Improve the A.M. and P.M. peak hour performance of the Clay Bank Road/Air Base Parkway intersection (study intersection 12) … prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 1,330th unit constructed by Lewis Planned Communities.” Since Project units would be treated as Village II units, these mitigation measures would be triggered just as the VAF EIR contemplated. Appendix B includes an analysis of intersection operations with the addition of Project units. All of the mitigation measures from the VAF EIR and subsequent addenda would continue to apply to the entire Project, including the Project.

While the CEQA Guidelines now consider VMT, addenda do not need to consider new impact areas added after the EIR was concluded. See Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1320 (adoption of new guidelines for GHG evaluation was no significant new information requiring further CEQA review because GHG emissions were known information and could have been addressed in the original EIR); Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. Dept. of Health Servs. (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1574, 1605 (new critical habitat regulation was not significant new information because impacts to the species had already been addressed

Page 896 of 1141 ends

31 in original EIR.) Since the trip distribution and generation of the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, and the Project would be similar to and less than the values in the approved VAF EIR, the Project would not be projected to result in any new transportation impacts beyond those studied in the VAF EIR. From a VMT perspective, there may be a nominal difference between the HMW project that would have routed trips via Portland Drive and Manuel Campos Parkway and the Project configuration that would route trips via Village II to Clay Bank Road. Routing trips to the west may in fact reduce VMT as it shortens the distance to I-80.

Environmental Issues
Transportation - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
No Substantial Change
from Previous VAF EIR
Analysis
No Substantial Change from
Previous Hawthorne Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system,
taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit
and non‐motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths,
and mass transit?
X 
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including but
not limited to level of service
standards and travel demand measures,
or other standards established by the
county congestion management
agency for designated roads or
highways?
X 
c) Result in a change in air traffic
patterns, including either an increase
in traffic levels or a change in location
that results in substantial safety risks?
X 
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
X 
e) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
X 
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans
or programs regarding public transit,
bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or
otherwise decrease the performance or
safety of such facilities?
X 

Page 897 of 1141 ends

32 N. PUBLIC FACILITIES

The potential impacts of the Project related to public facilities are driven by the number of residential units and associated population. As discussed in the project description above, most of the residential units in the Project are being re-allocated from already- entitled units in Villages I- II, so it is appropriate to analyze impacts associated with the Project public facilities as VAF impacts under the VAF EIR. These impacts were analyzed in VAF EIR Chapter 5 (Public Facilities and Services). The VAF EIR concluded that all impacts of the Project related to Public Utilities would be less than significant with mitigation. All of the mitigation measures adopted in the VAF EIR and its addenda would continue to apply to the Project, including the Project.

The Hawthorne Mill West project contemplated wastewater collection via the sanitary sewer lift station to be constructed as part of Village II, with a backup alternative of connecting to the existing sanitary sewer system at Portland Drive via a temporary lift station and sewer line under the proposed Portland Drive extension. The Project can utilize the now-built Village II sewage infrastructure and route sewage to the west to the sewer lift station. Other utility connections that were assumed to be routed under the proposed Portland Drive extension would be routed to the infrastructure that has already been built or is under construction to serve Village II. Because the Project does not affect the VAF-wide total number of units that was originally studied in the VAF EIR (2,327 total units), demand for all utility services will be similar to what was originally studied and approved in the VAF EIR, so the Project will not result in any new significant or substantially more severe impacts related to utilities.

Environmental Issues
Utilities - Would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
X 
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental
effects
X 
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which would cause
significant environmental effects?
X 

Page 898 of 1141 ends

33 d) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
X 
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider, which
serves or may serve the project that it
has inadequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition
to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X 
f) Be served by a landfill with
insufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project’s solid waste
disposal needs?
X 
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
X 

O. WILDFIRE
The Hawthorne Mill EIR included an analysis of risks related to wildfire in the Hazards section, consistent with the version of the CEQA Guidelines in place at the time the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified. The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that potential impacts of the Hawthorne Mill West project related to wildfire would be less-than-significant as the project site is not located in a high or extreme wildfire hazard zone, and is relatively flat, surrounded by industrial and residential uses, and regularly grazed. Existing conditions on the Project site have not materially changed since the Hawthorne Mill EIR was certified, and the potential impacts of the Project related to wildfire are substantially similar to those analyzed in the Hawthorne Mill EIR. No mitigation was required in the Hawthorne Mill EIR.

Environmental Issues

Wildfire: If located in or near state
responsibility areas or lands classified as
very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
X 
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose project occupants
to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
X 

Page 899 of 1141 ends

34 wildfire?
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result
in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
X 
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or landslides,
as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X 

P. ENERGY
Since most of the units in the Project are being re-allocated from already approved Village I-II units, this Addendum considers them Village I-II units for the purposes of analyzing Energy impacts. The VAF EIR did not formally analyze potential energy impacts. State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist thresholds were updated by the State Office of Planning and Research after publication of the VAF EIR. The current State CEQA Appendix G checklist contains separate thresholds for Energy, which are incorporated into this Addendum, and shown in the checklist below. However, the total number of units in VAF with the addition of the Project will remain the same as the number of units originally analyzed in the VAF EIR, so any Energy- related impacts associated with Project would be consistent with or less than those of the VAF Project. Additionally, the units in the Project will implement Title 24 energy efficiency standards, ensuring that it is more energy-efficient than those originally analyzed in the VAF EIR.

Energy Impacts- Would the project: New
Significant
Impact or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous

VAF EIR
Analysis
No
Substantial
Change
from
Previous
Hawthorne
Mill EIR
Analysis
No Impact
c) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
X 
d) Conflict with or obstruct a state or
local plan for renewable energy or
energy efficiency?
X 

Page 900 of 1141 ends

35 Q. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
A. Agricultural and Forest Resources: The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that residential development on the Project development area would have no impacts related to agricultural and forest resources. There is no change to this conclusion with the Project.

B. Mineral Resources: The Hawthorne Mill EIR concluded that residential development on the Project development area would have no impacts related to mineral resources. There is no change to this conclusion with the Project.

CONCLUSION

This Addendum is adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164. The Addendum reviews the proposed development activities and project changes discussed above. Through the adoption of this Addendum, the City determines that the proposed Project does not require a subsequent EIR or negative declaration under Guidelines Section 15162. The City further determines that the Hawthorne Mill EIR; the VAF EIR; the 2011, 2015 and 2018 Addenda to the VAF EIR; and this Addendum to the Hawthorne Mill EIR and the VAF EIR, adequately address the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project.

As provided in Section 15164 of Guidelines, this Addendum need not be circulated for public review, but shall be considered along with the prior environmental documents before making a decision to adopt the Project approvals.

The above referenced resolutions, ordinance, EIRs, and the 2011, 2015 and 2018 Addenda and this 2022 Addendum are all available for public review in the Community Development Department (1000 Webster Street, 2nd Floor Fairfield, CA) during regular business hours and are all incorporated herein by reference.

Page 901 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 1 of 22 Memorandum
To: Tina Do Machado, AICP
Garland Wong, PE, TE
Public Works Department | City of Fairfield
From: Mario Tambellini, PE, TE
Nicole Scappaticci, PE
Noor Feyli
Date: May 6, 2025
Subject: Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis

1. INTRODUCTION
This memorandum has been prepared to present the results of a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Project (Project) located in the City of Fairfield (City). The Project is located on two currently undeveloped parcels and is proposed to be part of the previously approved Villages at Fairfield. The Project would develop 150 relatively compact single family dwelling units and 226 duplex/condominium units for a total of 376 residential units.

The purpose of this TIA is to address the Project’s impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in relation to the prior analyses for the approved Villages at Fairfield and evaluate the Project’s potential off-site and on-site traffic operations. The local traffic operations analysis in this study was conducted to evaluate the adequacy of proposed queue storage lengths at the Clay Bank Road & Manuel Campos Parkway intersection, as requested by the City.

The local access operations analysis portion of this TIA includes the following sections:

1. Introduction
o Project History
o Project Description
o TIA Approach

2. Local Traffic Operations Analysis
o Study Facilities and Analysis Scenarios
o Analysis Methodology
o Traffic Volumes and Geometries
o Intersection Queuing Analysis
o Site Access and Internal Circulation
The CEQA impact analysis portion of this TIA includes the following sections:

3. CEQA Transportation Analysis
o Multimodal Facilities
o Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Policy Analysis
A Conclusion section is also provided at the end of this memorandum.

PROJECT HISTORY
The current Project (Lago Vista) was formerly known as the Villages at Fairfield Village IIA project. Before Lago Vista/Villages at Fairfield Village IIA was proposed, the Hawthorne Mill West (HMW) (subsequently renamed to Cooper’s Landing) project was under consideration at the Project site. The Lago Vista Project is being proposed as an extension of the directly adjacent Villages at Fairfield Village II and is being integrated

Page 902 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 2 of 22 into the overall Villages at Fairfield (VAF) project. The CEQA impacts of the overall VAF project were studied in The Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report (VAF EIR). The VAF EIR was certified in 2005, and the overall VAF project was amended in 2010, 2015, and 2018 pursuant to Addenda to the 2005 VAF EIR.

The Addenda to the 2005 VAF EIR did not perform new traffic analysis for the revised VAF project as they found that the proposed changes in scope would not result in new impacts. The entire VAF project is covered by a Development Agreement as it has been amended.

The 2005 VAF EIR originally analyzed a total of 2,341 residential units, including 1,102 units in Villages I and II. The 2005 VAF EIR also originally included 24.3 acres of mixed-use development in Village II. Subsequently, the approved final maps for Villages I and II, which are consistent with the changes proposed in the three Addenda to the VAF EIR, included only 806 residential units (432 in Village I and 374 in Village II). The currently approved Village II does not include any mixed-use area. Note that the land use quantities pertaining to the original VAF EIR described in this TIA refer to the land use quantities analyzed in the 2005 VAF EIR Traffic Impact Study, which studied a slightly higher number of units than was included in the original EIR Project Description. Page 29 of the 2005 VAF EIR Traffic Impact Study states:
“This analysis was conducted when the proposed Villages at Fairfield consisted of 2,341 residential units plus commercial, recreation, public facilities, and open space in northeast Fairfield. The current proposed project includes only 2,327 residential units, 14 less than analyzed in this report. Hence, the analysis is slightly conservative however this reduction in units does not affect the impacts or mitigation measures identified in this report.”
Based on the above, the certified 2005 VAF EIR analyzed the impact of trips from 296 residential units and

24.3 acres of mixed-use development beyond what is currently proposed in the approved final maps for Villages I and II. As a result, the VAF project as originally approved and studied under CEQA can accommodate additional units within the trip generation budget already studied for Villages I and II.

The approved final maps for Villages I and II (806 residential units) are mostly built out. The three final communities/units within Villages I and II are currently under construction. A new development within VAF, Parkside, has been proposed which is located within Village I and consists of 77 single-family detached dwelling units.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project is located on two currently undeveloped parcels, totaling approximately 37.8 acres, located north of Air Base Parkway and east of Abundance Way. The two parcels are identified as APNs 170-050-040 and 170-050-550. The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local roadway connections to Golden Way and High Line Drive. The Project would develop 150 relatively compact single family dwelling units and 226 duplex/condominium units for a total of 376 residential units. The Project also proposes a new 12-foot wide multi-use trail to the north of the site that would connect a cul-de-sac proposed at the north end of the Project site to a proposed 90-degree connection of Portland Drive and Nightfall Lane that would be constructed by the Project. The Project location is included in Figure 1 and the Project site plan is shown in Figure 2.

The Project site is currently zoned as Industrial and Business Park (IBP), Residential Medium (RM), and Open Space Conservation (OSC). The Project site’s current general plan designation is Residential Low-Medium (RLM) and Open Space Conservation (OSC). The Project’s proposed zoning is Residential Low-Medium (RLM), Residential High (RH), and Open Space Conservation (OSC). The Project’s proposed general plan designation is Residential Low-Medium (RLM), Residential High (RH), and Open Space Conservation (OSC).

TIA APPROACH
Since the Project is being proposed as an extension of the overall VAF project, and the VAF project has an approved EIR, this TIA evaluates if/how the Project would change transportation impacts previously identified under the VAF EIR. The Project’s 150 compact single-family detached dwelling units and 226 duplex/condominium units would generate Project external trips. However, the Project’s trip generation is

Page 903 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 3 of 22 anticipated to generally fit within the original VAF EIR trip generation for Villages I and II. In other words, trip “credits” from Villages I and II would be used to offset trips from the Project.

The TIA was prepared in accordance with the City of Fairfield local transportation analysis guidelines (dated December 22, 2020). Note that since the Project falls under the overall VAF project, which has an approved EIR, this TIA does not evaluate the Project as a “new” project, meaning this TIA does not evaluate the Project against new California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) considerations such as typical vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita thresholds. Instead, this TIA compares Project impacts to the approved VAF EIR.

The TIA includes a qualitative evaluation of VMT in the context of the Project generated VMT compared to the VMT generated by the VAF project in the approved EIR.

2. LOCAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS

STUDY FACILITIES AND ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
Traffic operations analyses were performed under the following scenarios:
• Existing Plus Background Plus Project Conditions
Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions represents a near-term future scenario when the remaining Villages at Fairfield (VAF) Villages I and II homes, as well as the proposed Parkside development located within Village I (Background growth) have been fully constructed and occupied, and the Project (Lago Vista) homes have been constructed and occupied. This scenario was selected for analysis in order to ensure that the proposed improvements to the study intersection are sized appropriately to accommodate queues that would be experienced after buildout of the VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Project.

The following one (1) intersection was included in this analysis:

1. Clay Bank Road & Manuel Campos Parkway
The location of the above study intersection is shown in Figure 1. The study intersection was chosen based on how the anticipated trip assignment of the Project may cause slightly different travel patterns at these intersections compared to those studied under VAF EIR conditions. The intersection of Clay Bank Road & Air Base Parkway was not evaluated because traffic patterns/distribution of the proposed Project trips at this intersection would be the same as those studied in the approved VAF EIR.

Page 904 of 1141 ends

!(1
Project Location
Project Location and Study Vicinity
Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\Fig_1_Location_and_Facilities_Map.mxd 4/1/2024 5:13:13 PM nfeyli Figure 1
NORTH
0 700350
Feet
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
#

Page 905 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 6 of 22

ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Queuing Methodology
SimTraffic 12 software was used to estimate study intersection 95th percentile queueing under weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions. The SimTraffic microsimulation models were run for a 60-minute analysis period with a 10-minute warm-up period, and reported queues were based on the average of 10 runs.

SimTraffic Queueing reports and HCM 7th Edition reports were generated for the study intersection. Existing signal timings for the Clay Bank Road & Manuel Campos Parkway intersection were obtained from the City and utilized in the analysis.

TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND GEOMETRIES
Existing Traffic Counts
AM and PM peak hour traffic counts for the one (1) existing study intersection were collected on Thursday, March 14, 2024. The AM peak hour is defined as the highest one hour of traffic flow counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM on a typical weekday. The PM peak hour is defined as the highest one hour of traffic flow counted between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM on a typical weekday. Raw traffic count data sheets are provided in Attachment A. Existing conditions traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. Existing conditions lane geometrics and control are shown in Figure 4 for informational purposes.

Page 907 of 1141 ends

!(1
Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes
Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
Clay Bank Road &
10 (
0 )
16 (
1 1
)
14 (
8 )
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
9 (9)
336 (228)
220 (188)
Manuel Campos Parkway
11 9

(
2 9
0 )
6 (
2 4
)
17 3

(
1 4
2 )
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
11 (3)
189 (278)
133 (159)
Manuel Campos Parkway
Manuel Campos Parkway1
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\TurningMovements\2023_Exist.mxd 5/2/2025 7:20:30 PM nscappaticci Figure 3
0 1,400700
Feet
NORTH
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
XX(XX)AM(PM) Peak Hour
Volumes
#
Project Location
Project Trip Distribution

Page 908 of 1141 ends

!(1
Existing Conditions Lane Geometrics and Control
Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\LaneGeometrics\Fig_LaneGeom_LaneGeom.mxd 4/1/2024 4:53:29 PM nfeyli Figure 4
NORTH
0 1,400700
Feet
Project Location
Stop Controlled Movement
Signalized Intersection
Turning Movement
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
#

Page 909 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 9 of 22 Background Trip Generation
The trip generation data contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used to approximate the number of trips that will be generated by the VAF Villages I and II homes that were not yet constructed and occupied at the time traffic counts were collected. The VAF Villages I and II are located directly northwest/west of the Lago Vista Project. The number of in-progress (unoccupied and/or unconstructed) single-family residential dwellings was provided by the Project applicant. At the time traffic counts were taken for this TIA (March 14, 2024), Village I Lot 2 Remainder had 49 unconstructed/unoccupied single family dwelling units, and Village II Lot 3 and 4 Remainders had 135 unconstructed/unoccupied single family dwelling units. The proposed Parkside development was also included in the background growth volumes.

The Parkside development proposes to construct 77 single-family detached homes on one currently undeveloped parcel on the southeast corner of the Passion Lane and Gulf Drive intersection located in Village I.

The ITE land use category of Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) was used to represent the Villages at Fairfield Village I and II Remainders and the Parkside development (Background growth). Table 1 shows the adjacent Background trip generation estimate.

Table 1. Background Trip Generation
Land Use Units Quantity Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing –
Village II Lot 3 and 4 Remainders DU2 135 1,330 25 73 98 83 49 132 Single-Family Detached Housing –
Village 1 Lot 2 Remainder DU2 49 523 10 29 39 32 19 51
Parkside DU2 77 793 15 44 59 49 29 78
Total Project Trips 2,646 50 146 196 164 97 261
Notes:
1 Trip rates are based on fitted curve equations contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition 2DU = Dwelling Unit
As illustrated in Table 1, the in-progress Village I and II homes and proposed Parkside development are anticipated to generate a total of 2,646 daily trips, 196 AM peak hour primary trips (50 inbound, 146 outbound), and 261 PM peak hour trips (164 inbound, 97 outbound) under typical weekday traffic demand conditions, once constructed and occupied.

The trip distribution for the background trips was estimated using the latest version of the 2020 City of Fairfield Travel Demand Forecasting (TDF) Model and engineering judgement. Background trip distribution and assignment are shown in Figure 5.

Page 910 of 1141 ends

!(1
Background Growth Trip Distribution and Assignment
Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
Clay Bank Road &
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
2 (1)
1 (4)
Manuel Campos Parkway
4 (
2 )
20 (
1 2
)
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
1 (2)
7 (21)
Manuel Campos Parkway
Manuel Campos Parkway1
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\TurningMovements\2023_Background.mxd 5/2/2025 7:19:52 PM nscappaticci Figure 5
15%
0 1,400700
Feet
NORTH
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
XX(XX)AM(PM) Peak Hour
Volumes
#
Project Location
%Project Trip Distribution
5%
7%
55%8%
10%

Page 911 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 11 of 22 Project Trip Generation
The trip generation data contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used to approximate the number of trips generated by the Project. The ITE land use category of Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) and Single-Family Attached Housing (ITE Code 215) were used to represent the Project single family home and duplex units, respectively. Table 2 shows the Project trip generation estimate.

Table 2. Project Trip Generation
Land Use Units Quantity Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing DU2 150 1,465 27 81 108 91 54 145 Single-Family Attached Housing DU2 226 1,672 28 84 112 78 54 132 Total Project Trips 3,137 55 165 220 169 108 277
Notes:
1 Trip rates are based on fitted curve equations contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition 2DU = Dwelling Unit
As illustrated in Table 2, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate a total of 3,137 daily trips, 220 AM peak hour primary trips (55 inbound, 165 outbound), and 277 PM peak hour trips (169 inbound, 108 outbound) under typical weekday traffic demand conditions.

The trip distribution for the Project was estimated based on using the latest version of the 2020 City of Fairfield TDF Model and engineering judgement. Project trip distribution and assignment are shown in Figure 6. A plot of the select node Fairfield TDF Model run that was used to inform the Project trip distribution is included at the end of this memorandum as Attachment B.

Existing Plus Background Plus Project Conditions
Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions represents a near-term future scenario when the remaining VAF Villages I and II homes and Parkside development (Background growth) have been fully constructed and occupied, and the Project (Lago Vista) homes have been constructed and occupied. Background volumes and Project volumes were added to existing traffic counts in order to obtain Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions volumes. Existing volumes were also balanced up based on counts taken at the adjacent Clay Bank Road & Gulf Drive and Portland Drive & Manuel Campos Parkway/Cement Hill Road in order to be consistent with the Villages at Fairfield Parkside Transportation Impact Analysis (Wood Rodgers, May 2025).

The Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions volumes are shown in Figure 7.

Offsite roadway improvements are proposed alongside VAF Villages I and II, including improvements to the Clay Bank Road & Manuel Campos Parkway intersection. It was assumed that the improvements shown in the VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans (Wood Rodgers, September 2021) would be in place under Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions, as the improvements are currently on track to be completed before buildout of the Lago Vista Project. Study intersection lane geometrics and control under Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions are shown in Figure 8.

Page 912 of 1141 ends

!(1
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
Clay Bank Road &
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
3 (8)
Manuel Campos Parkway
8 (
5 )
25 (
1 6
)
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
8 (25)
Manuel Campos Parkway
Manuel Campos Parkway1
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\TurningMovements\2023_Proj.mxd 5/2/2025 7:20:46 PM nscappaticci Figure 6
15%
0 1,400700
Feet
NORTH
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
XX(XX)AM(PM) Peak Hour
Volumes
#
Project Location
%Project Trip Distribution
5%
7%
55%8%
10%

Page 913 of 1141 ends

!(1
Existing Plus Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes
Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
Clay Bank Road &
10 (
0 )
16 (
1 1
)
14 (
9 )
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
9 (9)
345 (229)
229 (200)
Manuel Campos Parkway
13 3

(
3 1
2 )
6 (
2 4
)
22 2

(
1 7
0 )
Cl
a
y

B
a
n
k

R
o
a
d
11 (3)
190 (294)
148 (205)
Manuel Campos Parkway
Manuel Campos Parkway1
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\TurningMovements\2023_E+B+P.mxd 5/2/2025 7:20:12 PM nscappaticci Figure 7
0 1,400700
Feet
NORTH
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
XX(XX)AM(PM) Peak Hour
Volumes
#
Project Location
Project Trip Distribution

Page 914 of 1141 ends

!(1
Existing Plus Background Plus Project Lane Geometrics and Control Lago Vista TIA
Fairfield, CA
May 2025
J:\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\GIS\Lago_Vista\Tasks\LaneGeometrics\Fig_PropLaneGeom_PropLaneGeom.mxd 4/1/2024 5:10:41 PM nfeyli Figure 8
NORTH
0 1,400700
Feet
Project Location
Signalized Intersection
Turning Movement
Legend
!(Study Intersections
Project Location
#

Page 915 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 15 of 22

INTERSECTION QUEUEING ANALYSIS
Vehicle queuing was analyzed at the Clay Bank Road & Manuel Campos Parkway intersection for all movements under Existing Plus Background Plus Project traffic volumes and lane geometrics. Table 3 shows the projected 95th percentile queues compared against available storage lengths under Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions.

Table 3. Queueing Analysis Results
# Intersection Movement
Available
Storage
(ft)
Peak Hour
95th Percentile Queue (ft)
Existing Plus Background
Plus Project
1 Clay Bank Rd & Manuel
Campos Pkwy
NBL 205 AM 140
PM 119
EBL 340 AM 23
PM 11
WBL 215 AM 137
PM 131
Notes: One queued vehicle length is considered to be 20 feet long. Bold values indicate that queue exceeds storage length.

As shown in Table 3, all queues are projected to fit within available storage. SimTraffic 95th percentile queueing results are included in Attachment C. HCM 7th Edition Synchro operations reports are also included in Attachment C for informational purposes.

SITE ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION
The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local roadway extensions of Golden Way and High Line Drive. On the west side of the Project site, which will contain the single-family detached dwelling units, internal circulation of the site would be provided by new local residential streets. The new residential streets would typically be 40 to 46 feet wide, including 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street, 8-foot parking lanes on one or both sides of the street, and 10-to-12-foot travel lanes (one lane in each direction). On the southeast side of the Project, which will contain the condominium/duplex units, internal circulation of the site would be provided via private streets. The private streets would connect to the neighboring local residential streets in two locations, including the main connection of Street B to High Line Drive, and a secondary connection of Private Street I to residential Street D. Both Private Street connections to the condominium/duplex units would be gated. The private streets would typically be approximately 26 to 40 feet wide, including one travel lane in each direction, and in some cases, parking and/or a sidewalk on one side of the street.

Since none of the proposed Project streets would be through streets, only Project trips are projected to use Project streets. Therefore, the Project site is projected to experience up to 3,137 total daily trips spread out throughout all of the Project streets. The connections to High Line Drive and Golden Way are also projected to experience 3,137 total daily trips, with High Line Drive experiencing approximately 75 percent of the traffic, and Golden Way experiencing approximately 25 percent of the traffic due to the projected Project trip distribution and proximity of each local residential street to the proposed homes. Based on the number of trips projected to occur on Project roadways, the proposed street sections are projected to be adequate to support on-site vehicular circulation. It is recommended that stop signs or yield signs be installed at the intersection of all proposed residential streets and/or private streets. It is recommended that the on-site intersections generally be one-way or two-way yield or stop controlled, with the street that has lower volumes being controlled.

Page 916 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 16 of 22 The overall Project site would have two primary access points to the surrounding local roadway system. The condominium/duplex community on the southeast portion of the site would have two gated access points to the adjacent residential streets for community residents. The Project also proposes one Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) Driveway with knock down bollards on the southwest corner of the Project site connecting proposed residential Street A with Air Base Parkway. It is recommended that the knock down bollards on the EVA Driveway be positioned far enough away from the edge of traveled way on Air Base Parkway so that two standard vehicle lengths could queue in front of the bollards without queueing back into Air Base Parkway (at least 50 feet). In addition, it is recommended that clear sight distance triangles be maintained free of obstacles at the EVA Driveway to allow emergency vehicles entering and exiting the EVA Driveway sufficient vision of surrounding traffic. Clear sight distance triangles at the EV A Driveway are shown in Attachment D at the end of this memorandum. There are existing 8-foot wide shoulders on Air Base Parkway adjacent to the proposed EVA Driveway that emergency vehicles could use to pull in and out of the driveway.

If the sight distance triangles are kept clear and the 8-foot wide shoulders on Air Base Parkway are maintained, the EVA Driveway is projected to be adequate for emergency access.

3. CEQA TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS

MULTIMODAL FACILITIES
Existing Multimodal Facilities
Pedestrian sidewalks currently exist along the east side of High Line Drive and along both sides of Golden Way to the west of the Project site. Horizon Circle has existing sidewalks on both sides of the street. Clay Bank Road has existing sidewalks on both sides of the street south of Merriment Place, and only on the west side of the street north of Merriment Place. A multi-use path exists along the Linear Park that runs diagonally northwest of the Project area from Clay Bank Road near Canal Street to Portland Drive.

Clay Bank Road has existing class II bicycle lanes between Rebecca Drive and Air Base Parkway. Cement Hill Road has existing class II bicycle lanes west of Clay Bank Road. Air Base Parkway is designated as a class II bicycle lane facility adjacent to the Project in the current Solano County Active Transportation Plan for Fairfield (Solano Transportation Authority, adopted in 2020).

The City of Fairfield is served by the Fairfield and Suisun Transit (FAST). Currently, there are no fixed-route transit stops within a half mile walk of the Project site. The closest transit stop to the Project site is located at Dover Avenue & Cement Hill Road (FAST Route 1), which is an approximately 1.8 mile walk from the Project site. However, FAST Connect on-demand microtransit operates Monday through Friday from approximately 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM and on Saturday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. The Project site is located in the FAST Connect Northeast Fairfield Zone. Therefore, Project residents would be able to use the FAST Connect “Ride Pingo” ride-share app to book a shared transit trip from the Project site to anywhere within the Northeast Fairfield Zone. If a Project resident needs to travel outside the zone, FAST Connect would drop them off at the nearest fixed-route stop. The FAST Route 1 transit stop at Dover Avenue & Cement Hill Road is located with the Northeast Fairfield Zone. Therefore, Project residents could access FAST via the Ride Pingo ride-share app.

Proposed Multimodal Facilities
The Project generally proposes sidewalks along both sides of the proposed Residential Streets adjacent to the single-family detached dwelling units in the west side of the Project site. In the southeast side of the Project site, where the condominiums/duplexes are proposed, the Project generally proposes north-south sidewalks along Private Streets E, J, and B, as well as an east-west pedestrian path from the leasing office at the center of the site to the eastern edge of the site. The Project also proposes a multi-use trail on the north side of the Project site that would connect the cul-de-sac at the north end of the proposed Court A to a proposed 90-degree connection of Portland Drive to Nightfall Lane to be constructed by the Project.

The VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans propose new sidewalks on the east side of Clay Bank Road between Merriment Place and Manuel Campos Parkway, as well as on the north and south

Page 917 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 17 of 22 sides of Manuel Campos Parkway between Clay Bank Road and Portland Drive. The VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans also propose buffered class II bike lanes on both sides of Clay Bank Road between Merriment Place and Manuel Campos Parkway, and on both sides of Manuel Campos Parkway between Clay Bank Road and Portland Drive. The multimodal improvements on Clay Bank Road are planned to be constructed by spring 2025. The multimodal improvements on Manuel Campos Parkway are planned to be constructed before buildout of the Lago Vista Project.

According to the current Solano County Active Transportation Plan for Fairfield, additional planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the study area include extending the existing class I multi -use path along the linear park in both directions (west and east), and further extension of class I and class III bicycle facilities and routes along Manual Campos Parkway/Cement Hill Road in both directions (west and east). The Fairfield existing and planned bicycle network from the Solano County Active Transportation Plan for Fairfield is shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9. Fairfield Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network

There are currently no proposed transit facilities within the vicinity of the Project site.

Multimodal Impact Criteria
The Fairfield VMT Guidelines outline the following impact criteria for multimodal operations (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access) in the City:
“Impacts on alternative modes can result from projects that in themselves generate a significant number of trips for these modes or that are located on roadways that have been designated to serve these modes of travel. The assessment of impacts may be based on one or more of the following factors: counts for bicycle and pedestrian movements, location of bus stops, street width, collision history, transit boardings and alightings, and approved land use and transportation plans and capital improvement project s. Generally, project will be asked to implement pedestrian and bicycle improvements that have been identified in transportation plans, specific plans, or landscaping plans. Also, site-specific improvements may be identified to encourage alternate modes and /or enhance the safety of alternate modes."

Page 918 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 18 of 22 Multimodal Impacts
The Project is anticipated to increase pedestrian, bicycle, and transit demand in the study area. However, the increase in demand is not projected to put existing facilities over capacity or adversely affect existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities in a way that would discourage their use. The Project would not result in unsafe conditions for bicyclists or pedestrians or result in unsafe bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle conflicts. The Project proposes to construct on-site sidewalks that would serve the majority of the site. In the condominium/duplex community, pedestrians could travel along the low-speed private streets in order to reach the provided sidewalk paths that lead to the external pedestrian facilities.

Due to the suburban characteristics of the area, there are not a large number of key bicycle and pedestrian destinations in the study area. Key destinations could ultimately include the Linear Park to the northwest, the Laurel Creek Park and Elementary School to the west, and the existing and proposed retail along Clay Bank Road to the west. Project residents could reach the Linear Park via proposed internal sidewalks, the proposed trail connection to Portland Drive/Nightfall Lane, and existing sidewalks along Portland Drive or Nightfall Lane. Project residents could reach the Laurel Creek Park and Elementary School via existing sidewalks along High Line Drive, Horizon Circle, Clay Bank Road, and Cement Hill Road. Similarly, Project residents could reach the existing and proposed shopping on Clay Bank Road via existing sidewalks along High Line Drive, Horizon Circle, and Clay Bank Road. Any existing gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle routes to key destinations are already proposed to be filled by the Project or VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans, which would be constructed before buildout of the Lago Vista Project. The Lago Vista Project would provide sidewalk and bike route connectivity from the nearby existing facilities to the Project residences via improvements (sidewalks and local roads for bike routes) on internal Project roadways. Project residents would also have the option to use the FAST Connect on-demand microtransit.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) POLICY ANALYSIS
Approved Environmental Document
As stated in the Project History section of this TIA, the certified 2005 VAF EIR originally analyzed a total of 1,102 units in Villages I and II as well as 24.3 acres of mixed-use development in Village II. Subsequently, the approved final maps for Villages I and II included only 806 residential units (432 in Village I and 374 in Village II) and no mixed-use area. Therefore, the certified 2005 VAF EIR analyzed the impact of trips from 296 residential units and 24.3 acres of mixed-use development beyond what is currently proposed in the approved final maps for Villages I and II. As a result, the VAF project as originally approved and studied under CEQA can accommodate additional units within the trip generation budget already studied for Villages I and II.

Trip Generation Comparison
The land uses proposed by the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Lago Vista Project are different than those that were proposed and studied for VAF Villages I and II under the VAF EIR. However, a comparison of the trip generation shows that the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Lago Vista Project would generally generate less trips than the land uses studied for VAF Villages I and II under the VAF EIR.

The VAF EIR project description included development of 204 low-medium density units and 628 high density units in Village I and 270 low-medium density units with a 24.3-acre mixed-use lot (assumed to be 77% commercial use in Appendix 3 of the VAF EIR) in Village II. The previously approved Villages I and II trip generation was obtained from Chapter 4 of the VAF EIR Appendix 3: Traffic Analysis for The Villages at Fairfield (TJKM, February 4, 2005).

Currently proposed build-out of Village I includes 432 single-family dwelling units, and currently proposed build-out of Village II includes 374 single-family dwelling units. The proposed Parkside development, which is an extension of Village I, proposes 77 single-family dwelling units. The currently proposed Lago Vista Project, which is an extension of Village II, includes 150 single-family dwelling units and 226

Page 919 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 19 of 22 condominium/duplex dwelling units. Trip generation for the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Lago Vista Project was estimated using industry standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition trip generation rates.

Table 4 summarizes the trip generation comparison of the land uses studied for VAF Villages I and II under the VAF EIR (VAF EIR Conditions) and the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Lago Vista Project (Currently Proposed Conditions).

Table 4. VAF Villages I and II EIR vs Currently Proposed Trip Generation Comparison Location Description Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips
In Out Total In Out Total

VAF EIR
Conditions1
Village I 204 Low-Med Density Units,
628 High Density Units 6,115 89 384 473 393 203 596
Village II 270 Low-Med Density Units,

24.3 Acres Mixed-Use 6,978 115 193 308 359 297 656
Total 13,093 204 577 781 752 500 1,252
Currently
Proposed
Conditions2
Village I 432 Single-Family Detached
DU3 3,878 71 211 282 248 145 393
Village II 374 Single-Family Detached
DU 3,396 62 185 247 216 127 343
Parkside 77 Single-Family Detached
DU 793 15 44 59 49 29 78
Lago Vista
150 Single-Family Detached
DU, 226 Single-Family
Attached (Duplex) DU
3,137 55 165 220 169 108 277
Total 11,204 203 605 808 682 409 1,091
Difference (EIR – Final Buildout) 1,889 1 -28 -27 70 91 161 Notes:
1 Source: Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report, Table 4 -6 and VAF EIR Appendix 3: Traffic Analysis for The Villages at Fairfield (TJKM, February 4, 2005), Tables IX and X. The VAF EIR trip generation is based on rates found in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition.
2 Trip rates based on fitted curve equations for the proposed land use consistent with information contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition
3DU = Dwelling Units
As shown in Table 4, the Currently Proposed Conditions of Villages I and II with the addition of the proposed Parkside development and Lago Vista Project trips would generate 1,889 fewer daily trips, 27 more AM peak hour trips, and 161 fewer PM peak hour trips than the VAF EIR Conditions trip generation for Villages I and II.

The Currently Proposed Conditions of VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Lago Vista Project have similar access points to the surrounding local roadway network as the VAF EIR Conditions project layouts did, including direct access to Clay Bank Road and Manual Campos Parkway. The similar access points means that traffic generated by the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Parkside development, and Lago Vista Projet would generally distribute to study intersections similar to the project distribution assumed in the VAF EIR.

Currently Proposed Conditions are estimated to generate 27 more AM peak hour trips than VAF EIR conditions. The slight difference in AM peak hour trips would not be large enough to affect traffic operations at nearby intersections or result in new traffic impacts or mitigations beyond those studied in the VAF EIR.

Currently Proposed Conditions are estimated to generate 161 less PM peak hour trips than VAF EIR conditions. The slight difference in PM peak hour trips means that PM traffic operations at nearby intersections would be the same or better than operations studied in the VAF EIR. Currently Proposed Conditions are estimated to generate 1,889 less daily trips than VAF EIR conditions. The slight difference in daily trips means that VMT generated by the overall VAF development would be the same or less than studied in the VAF EIR.

Page 920 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 20 of 22 Since the background land use and transportation context in the Project area has not changed substantially such that new environmental impacts are anticipated from development of the Project site , reliance on the approved EIR is generally acceptable as established in Concerned Dublin Citizens (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1318–1320 and Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach (2023) Cal.App.5th. These court decisions found that a change in the CEQA Guidelines is not new information triggering new CEQA analysis so long as the impacts of the project were considered in the initial EIR. Since VMT was included in the air quality analysis section of the approved VAF EIR, it can be argued that VMT was considered for development of the Project site. Since the proposed Project site has a previously approved EIR that considered VMT, reliance on the approved EIR is acceptable and the Project would not be required to reevaluate transportation CEQA impacts.

Comparison to the Hawthorne Mill West Site
From a VMT perspective, there may be a nominal difference between the previously proposed HMW project that would have routed trips via Portland Drive and Manuel Campos Parkway and the Lago Vista configuration that would route trips via Village II to Clay Bank Road. Routing trips to the west may in fact reduce VMT compared to the HMW configuration as it shortens the distance to I-80.

VAF EIR Mitigation Measures at Offsite Intersections
The approved VAF EIR included implementation of several transportation mitigation measures at nearby intersections, including improvements at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway. Since the improvements identified by the VAF EIR have already been installed at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway, the intersection is projected to have sufficient capacity to serve VAF development trips, including trips from Lago Vista and Parkside.

4. CONCLUSION
Project Description
The Project is located on two currently undeveloped parcels, totaling approximately 37.8 acres, located north of Air Base Parkway and east of Abundance Way. The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local roadway connections to Golden Way and High Line Drive. The Project would develop 150 relatively compact single family dwelling units and 226 duplex/condominium units for a total of 376 residential units. The Project also proposes a new 12-foot wide multi-use trail to the north of the site that would connect a cul-de-sac proposed at the north end of the Project site to a proposed 90-degree connection of Portland Drive and Nightfall Lane that would be constructed by the Project.

LOCAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Project Trip Generation
The proposed Project is anticipated to generate a total of 3,137 daily trips, 220 AM peak hour primary trips (55 inbound, 165 outbound), and 277 PM peak hour trips (169 inbound, 108 outbound) under typical weekday traffic demand conditions.

Intersection Queueing Analysis
Vehicle queuing was analyzed at the Clay Bank Road & Manel Campos Parkway intersection for all movements under Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions using SimTraffic software. Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions represents a near-term future scenario when the remaining VAF Villages I and II homes, and Parkside development (Background growth) have been fully constructed and occupied, and the Project (Lago Vista) homes have been constructed and occupied. It was assumed that the improvements shown in the VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans (Wood Rodgers, September 2021) would be in place under Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions. All queues are projected to fit within available storage.

Page 921 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 21 of 22 Site Access and Internal Circulation
The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local roadway extensions of Golden Way and High Line Drive. The new residential streets would typically be 40 to 46 feet wide, including 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street, 8-foot parking lanes on one or both sides of the street, and 10-to-12- foot travel lanes (one lane in each direction). Private Street connections for the condominium s would be gated. The private streets would typically be approximately 26 to 40 feet wide, including one travel lane in each direction, and in some cases, parking and/or a sidewalk on one side of the street.

Based on the number of trips projected to occur on Project roadways, the proposed street sections are projected to be adequate to support on-site vehicular circulation. It is recommended that stop signs or yield signs be installed at the intersection of all proposed residential streets and/or private streets. It is recommended that the on-site intersections generally be one-way or two-way yield or stop controlled, with the street that has lower volumes being controlled.

Emergency Access
The Project proposes one Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) Driveway with knock down bollards on the southwest corner of the Project site connecting proposed residential Street A with Air Base Parkway. It is recommended that the knock down bollards on the EVA Driveway be positioned far enough away from the edge of traveled way on Air Base Parkway so that two standard vehicle lengths could queue in front of the bollards without queueing back into Air Base Parkway (at least 50 feet). In addition, it is recommended that clear sight distance triangles be maintained free of obstacles at the EVA Driveway to allow emergency vehicles entering and exiting the EVA Driveway sufficient vision of surrounding traffic. Clear sight distance triangles at the EVA Driveway are shown in Attachment D. There are existing 8-foot wide shoulders on Air Base Parkway adjacent to the proposed EVA Driveway that emergency vehicles could use to pull in and out of the driveway. If the sight distance triangles are kept clear and the 8-foot wide shoulders on Air Base Parkway are maintained, the EVA Driveway is projected to be adequate for emergency access.

CEQA TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
Multimodal Impacts
The Project is anticipated to increase pedestrian, bicycle, and transit demand in the study area. However, the increase in demand is not projected to put existing facilities over capacity or adversely affect existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities in a way that would discourage their use. The Project would not result in unsafe conditions for bicyclists or pedestrians or result in unsafe bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle conflicts. The Project proposes to construct on-site sidewalks that would serve the majority of the site. In the condominium/duplex community, pedestrians could travel along the low-speed private streets in order to reach the provided sidewalk paths that lead to the external pedestrian facilities. Any existing gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle routes to key destinations are already proposed to be filled by the Project or VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans. Project residents would also have the option to use the FAST Connect on-demand microtransit.

VMT Policy Analysis
The Currently Proposed Conditions of Village I, Village II, and Parkside development with the addition of the proposed Lago Vista Project trips would generate 1,889 fewer daily trips, 27 more AM peak hour trips, and 161 fewer PM peak hour trips than the VAF EIR Conditions trip generation for Villages I and II. The slight difference in AM peak hour trips would not be large enough to affect traffic operations at nearby intersections or result in new traffic impacts or mitigations beyond those studied in the VAF EIR. Therefore the Lago Vista Project would not be projected to result in any new transportation impacts beyond those studied in the VAF EIR. Since the proposed Project site has a previously approved EIR that considered VMT, and the background land use and transportation context in the Project area has not changed substantially such that new environmental impacts are anticipated from development of the Project site, reliance on the approved EIR is acceptable and the Project would not be required to reevaluate transportation CEQA impacts.

Page 922 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis 22 of 22 The approved VAF EIR included implementation of several transportation mitigation measures at nearby intersections, including improvements at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway. Since the improvements identified by the VAF EIR have already been installed at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway, the intersection is projected to have sufficient capacity to serve VAF development trips, including trips from Lago Vista and Parkside.

Page 923 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT A

TRAFFIC COUNTS

Page 924 of 1141 ends

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID:24-080057-001 Day:

City:Fairfield Date:

AM 10 16 14 0
AM
NOON 0 0 0 0
NOON
PM 0 11 8 0
PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 1 0 0.5 9 0 9
1 228 0 336
4 0 0 0 0.5 188 0 220
7 0 3 0.3 TEV 1236 0 1340 0 0 0 0
189 0 278 0.3 PHF 0.95 0.95
133 0 159 0.3 0 0.5 0.5 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 142 24 290
PM
NOON 0 0 0 0
NOON
AM 0 173 6 119
AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM)Total Bikes (PM)
0 369

NORTHBOUND
Clay Bank Rd
Totals (NOON)Total Bikes (NOON)
NONE
576 0 322
Totals (AM)358 Total Bikes (AM)
Ma
n
u
e
l

C
a
m
p
o
s

P
k
w
y
EA
S
T
B
O
U
N
D
WE
S
T
B
O
U
N
D
Ma
n
u
e
l

C
a
m
p
o
s

P
k
w
y
523 0 370

CONTROL
Signalized
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 36
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Clay Bank Rd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 3/14/2024
4:00 PM - 06:00 PMPE
A
K

H
O
U
R
S
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 22 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM CO
U
N
T

P
E
R
I
O
D
S

NOONAM PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
NO
O
N

PM AM NO
O
N
AM
PM
NO
O
N
AM
PMNO
O
N
PM AM
00 0
10 0
0 0 0 00 0
10 0
10 0
00 100 0
0 0
00 0
0 0 0 0
000
0 0
00 0
0 0 0 0
000
0 0
00 0
0 0 0 0
000
9 228
188159
278
3 0 11 8
29 0
2414
2 0
0 00
0 0
0 0 0
000
9 336
220133
189
7 10 16 14
11 9
617
3

Page 925 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT B
FAIRFIELD TDF MODEL – PROJECT SELECT NODE PLOT

Page 926 of 1141 ends

Base Year 2020 Plus Project Scenario – Select Project Node 601 Run Daily Bi-Directional Volumes (Total ADT)

Page 927 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT C
SYNCHRO HCM 6TH EDITION LOS REPORTS AND QUEUEING REPORTS

Page 928 of 1141 ends

Lago Vista TIA
1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy AM Existing Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 11 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 190 148 229 345 9 222 6 133 14 16 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 190 148 229 345 9 222 6 133 14 16 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 200 156 241 363 9 234 6 140 15 17 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 236 281 208 293 624 15 297 317 268 309 178 115 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1947 1441 1781 3543 88 1781 1870 1585 1781 1061 686 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 182 174 241 182 190 234 6 140 15 0 28 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1611 1781 1777 1854 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1747 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 6.0 6.3 8.0 5.7 5.8 7.7 0.2 4.9 0.4 0.0 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 6.0 6.3 8.0 5.7 5.8 7.7 0.2 4.9 0.4 0.0 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 236 256 232 293 313 327 297 317 268 309 0 293 V/C Ratio(X)0.05 0.71 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.58 0.79 0.02 0.52 0.05 0.00 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 874 1163 1054 874 1163 1214 874 1132 960 874 0 1086 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.2 24.9 25.1 24.7 23.1 23.1 24.4 21.2 23.1 21.1 0.0 21.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.4 1.8 2.2 0.6 0.6 1.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 2.3 2.3 3.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.2 26.3 26.9 26.9 23.7 23.7 26.2 21.2 23.7 21.1 0.0 21.6 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 368 613 380 43
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 25.0 25.2 21.4
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 14.6 15.3 15.4 13.9 16.6 15.2 15.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.1 * 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 40.0 30.0 * 38 30.0 40.0 30.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 8.3 9.7 2.8 2.4 7.8 2.4 6.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.3
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 929 of 1141 ends

Lago Vista TIA
1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy PM Existing Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 11 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 294 205 200 229 9 170 24 312 9 11 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 294 205 200 229 9 170 24 312 9 11 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 309 216 211 241 9 179 25 328 9 12 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 198 373 254 255 758 28 249 443 374 256 438 0 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2021 1378 1781 3494 130 1781 1870 1581 1781 1870 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 271 254 211 122 128 179 25 328 9 12 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1622 1781 1777 1847 1781 1870 1581 1781 1870 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 10.7 11.1 8.4 4.2 4.3 7.0 0.8 14.6 0.3 0.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 10.7 11.1 8.4 4.2 4.3 7.0 0.8 14.6 0.3 0.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 198 328 299 255 385 401 249 443 374 256 438 0 V/C Ratio(X)0.02 0.83 0.85 0.83 0.32 0.32 0.72 0.06 0.88 0.04 0.03 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 732 973 888 732 973 1011 732 947 801 732 973 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.9 28.6 28.8 30.4 24.1 24.1 30.1 21.6 26.8 26.9 21.6 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 4.3 4.1 3.5 1.6 1.7 3.0 0.3 5.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 28.9 30.7 31.4 33.0 24.2 24.2 31.5 21.6 29.5 26.9 21.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 528 461 532 21
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.0 28.3 29.8 23.9
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.3 19.3 15.3 22.2 13.9 21.6 15.1 22.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.1 * 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 40.0 30.0 * 38 30.0 40.0 30.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4 13.1 9.0 2.4 2.1 6.3 2.3 16.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 29.7
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 930 of 1141 ends

Queuing and Blocking Report
AM Existing Plus Project Peak Hour 05/02/2025
03_E+B+P_AM Lago Vista TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection: 1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)29 118 100 162 111 73 168 31 68 45 62 Average Queue (ft)7 54 42 81 38 22 85 4 37 15 17
95th Queue (ft)23 97 76 137 82 55 140 21 62 42 47
Link Distance (ft)474 474 553 553 849 849 788
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 215 205 160
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0

Page 931 of 1141 ends

Queuing and Blocking Report
PM Existing Plus Project Peak Hour 05/02/2025
04_E+B+P_PM Lago Vista TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection: 1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)21 171 166 161 92 50 141 51 116 37 34 Average Queue (ft)2 84 64 75 26 11 70 12 60 7 7
95th Queue (ft)11 143 123 131 60 33 119 38 96 29 28
Link Distance (ft)474 474 553 553 849 849 788
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 215 205 160
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0

Page 932 of 1141 ends

Villages at Fairfield Lago Vista Transportation Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT D

EVA DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLES

Page 933 of 1141 ends

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816

Page 934 of 1141 ends

WRA, Inc. | 2169 G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94901 www.wra-ca.com · ph: 415.454.8868

January 23, 2025

Rob White
Vice President Planned Communities
Lewis Management Corp.
9216 Kiefer Blvd.

Sacramento, CA 95826

Re: EIR Addendum Biological Summary for the Lago Vista Project

This letter was prepared to support the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) addendum for the Lago Vista Project (Project) located within two Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0170-050-090 and 0170-050-220 in Fairfield, California (Project Area). The purpose of this letter is to summarize additional biological considerations and regulatory changes that have occurred since the preparation of the Partially Recirculated Draft EIR (PDEIR; State Clearinghouse No. 2009032001) for the Hawthorne Mill Project in May 2014, under which the Project Area was initially evaluated. The report herein also includes a summary of biological surveys and mitigation that have been completed to date, as well as a discussion of additional requirements that will need to be completed prior to the initiation of Project construction.

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The following sections address items that have been completed by the Project to date as well as outstanding items that will need to be completed prior to the initiation of any ground disturbance.

1.1 Biological Surveys and Mitigation Requirements

1.1.1 Burrowing Owl

Per MM-BIO 1f of the PRDEIR, protocol-level wintering (“non-breeding”) and nesting (“breeding”) season surveys for burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia; BUOW) shall be conducted prior to the initiation of construction, with a final pre-construction survey conducted no more than 30 days prior to the first ground-disturbing activity. Past survey efforts were completed by WRA in 2020, 2021 and 2022. In 2023, four protocol-level breeding surveys were conducted for the Project. No burrowing owl or evidence of burrowing owl was observed within the Project Area or immediate vicinity during any site visit.

Given that the PDEIR includes requirements for both breeding and non-breeding surveys, the City of Fairfield (City) may require the Project to repeat a full year of BUOW surveys prior to the initiation of the Project. This would include four breeding surveys between February 15 and August 31 as well as four non-breeding surveys September 1 and January 31. To allow for

Page 935 of 1141 ends

WRA, Inc. | 2169 G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94901 www.wra-ca.com · ph: 415.454.8868
2 potential Project initiation in 2025, BUOW protocol-level wintering surveys began in 2024 and protocol-level breeding surveys will occur in 2025.

Per MM-BIO-1f, mitigation for BUOW is only required if owls are found onsite or within 600 meters of the Project Area.

1.1.2 Swainson’s Hawk and Other Raptors
MM-BIO-1d requires that habitat management lands be provided for each acre of Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni; SWHA) foraging habitat developed or removed within 5 miles of a recently active nest, in accordance with the CDFW (1994) mitigation requirements.1 Per the PDEIR, these lands shall be protected through fee title acquisition or conservation easement on agricultural lands, or other suitable lands that provide foraging habitat for SWHA.

At the time when the PDEIR was published in 2014, all lands within the Project Area occurred greater than 1 mile but less than 5 miles of a “recently active” SWHA nest (i.e., active in the last 5 years); therefore, foraging habitat mitigation was required at a 0.75:1 ratio. Currently, three recently active Swainson’s hawk nests are documented within two miles of the Project Area. As such, foraging habitat mitigation is still currently required at a 0.75:1 ratio to comply with MM- BIO-1d.

In addition to SWHA mitigation, MM-BIO-1h requires that the loss of suitable foraging habitat for general raptors within the Project Area be mitigated for at a 1:1 ratio through the purchase of credits at an approved off-site mitigation bank or the permanent preservation of suitable habitat. This will need to be completed prior to the commencement of the Project.

Lastly, MM-BIO-1g requires that a pre-construction survey for nesting raptors be conducted within the Project Area and surrounding 500 feet no more than 14 days prior to the onset of Project activities during the raptor nesting season (January 1 and August 31). If Project activities are also initiated within the nesting season for SWHA (April 1 through September 31), the survey will need to include suitable SWHA nesting habitat within 5 miles of the Project Area.

1.1.3 Rare Plants
WRA conducted two focused rare plant surveys within the Project Area in April 2022. Table 1 below summarizes the special-status plant species identified and mapped during the site visits.

Table 1. Summary of Special-Status Plant Species Mapped within the Project Area in April 2022

SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS POPULATION

ACREAGE
Contra Costa goldfields Lasthenia conjugens Federally Endangered, CNPS Rank 1B.1

0.06 acres
Ferris' goldfields Lasthenia ferrisiae CNPS Rank 4.2 0 acres* saline clover Trifolium
hydrophilum
CNPS Rank 1B.2 0 acres*

1 Department of Fish and Game (CDFW). November 1994. Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo Swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California.

Page 936 of 1141 ends

WRA, Inc. | 2169 G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94901 www.wra-ca.com · ph: 415.454.8868
3 bearded popcornflower Plagiobothrys
hystriculus
CNPS Rank 1B.1 0.01 acres (759
SF)
pappose tarplant Centromadia parryi
ssp. parryi
CNPS Rank 1B.2 0.43 acres
*These species were documented with the Open Space Area during the 2022 surveys. However, these species were not documented within the Project Area.

No additional rare plant surveys are required at this time.

Per MM-BIO-1b, preservation credits shall be purchased from an offsite mitigation bank at a 1:1 ratio to mitigate for impacts to occupied Contra Costa goldfield (Lasthenia conjugens) and pappose tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. Parryi) habitat. Proof of purchase of preservation credits shall be provided prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project.

The PDEIR does not include species-specific mitigation measures for Ferris’ goldfields, bearded popcornflower or saline clover, nor general mitigation measures for special-status species.

1.1.4 Wetlands
In November 2007, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) issued a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) which included the Project Area (Corps File No. 299100N). Distribution of the wetlands and non-wetland waters of the U.S. were preliminarily groundtruthed during a 2020 site visit in support of the Hawthorne Mill and Cooper’s Landing – Biological Constraints Assessment and Permitting Strategy (WRA 2020). The presence of these aquatic features was determined based on field observations made during the January 2020 site visit. Field observations included the presence of identifiable wetland vegetation, wetland hydrology (such as inundation), and topography indicative of where water would collect, such as depressions.

However, the type and extent of aquatic features should be considered preliminary, and a formal delineation of Waters of the U.S. and State should be conducted to confirm presence and extent of potentially jurisdictional features within the Project Area. An updated wetland delineation would also reflect any changes to feature jurisdiction based on the 2023 Conforming Rule, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- and Corp-issued final rule amending the 2023 definition of “Waters of the US” to conform with the recent Supreme Court decision in Sackett v. EPA.

1.2 Additional Regulatory Considerations
The following section addresses any relevant regulatory changes that have occurred since the PDEIR was published and evaluates implications that should be considered in the EIR addendum for the current Project.

Page 937 of 1141 ends

WRA, Inc. | 2169 G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94901 www.wra-ca.com · ph: 415.454.8868
4 1.2.1 Special-status Wildlife

BALD EAGLE
Bald Eagle (BAEA; Haliaeetus leucocephalus) BAEA are known to occur in the vicinity of the Project area (CNDDB 2024), Based on a 2018 CNDDB documented occurrence, BAEA have been reported to roost in a large walnut tree that occurs along the west bank of McCoy Pond, near the eastern boundary of the Study Area (CDFW 2022). While no nest structures or indications of nesting have been observed to date, this tree has potential to provide nesting habitat for this species in the future. Depending on the timing of construction, Project activities including noise, vibration, odors, and movement of workers or equipment could affect nests and have the potential to result in nest abandonment.

As previously noted, MM-BIO-1g requires that a pre-construction survey for nesting raptors be conducted within the Project Area and surrounding 500 feet no more than 14 days prior to the onset of Project activities during the raptor nesting season (January 1 and August 31). In addition, if Project activities are also initiated within the nesting season for SWHA (April 1 through September 31), the survey will need to include suitable SWHA nesting habitat within 5 miles of the Project Area (MM-BIO-1d). It is WRA's opinion that these measures are sufficient to detect BAEA nests given the limited availability of nesting habitat within the Project site and immediate vicinity.

WESTERN POND TURTLE
The PDEIR included the following measure (MM-BIO-1j) to address potential impacts to dispersing western pond turtles (WPT; Actinemys marmorata):

Prior to initiating construction activities within 25 feet of suitable aquatic habitat for Pacific (western) pond turtle, pre-construction surveys shall be conducted. If observed, WPT shall be relocated to a nearby, suitable location away from construction activities.

At the time the PDEIR was published in 2014, WPT was listed as a CDFW Species of Special Concern and could be relocated without the need for additional permits or consultation.

However, this species was proposed as Threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on October 3, 2023 (88 FR 68370). Federal proposed species are entitled to procedural protections under the ESA but are not protected from “take” until they are listed. Take as defined under the ESA means "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct." It is anticipated that the final rule for WPT will be issued by the end of 2024. If WPT are listed at that time, any subsequent take (including the relocation described in MM-BIO-1j) would be in violation of the ESA without take authorization from the USFWS.

The PDEIR determined that the perennial aquatic habitats on and adjacent to the Project Area were unlikely to support breeding populations but may provide marginal habitat for dispersal and foraging. However, the evaluation in the PDEIR included numerous aquatic features that are no longer immediately adjacent or necessarily relevant to the current Project. For example, Strassberger Basin, which was deemed as the only location to contain suitable year-round habitat for WPT, is no longer directly adjacent to the Project Area. Given the reduced footprint of

Page 938 of 1141 ends

Fairfield City CouncilSeptember 16, 2025

Fairfield City Council
September 16, 2025