Folsom City Council
January 11, 2022

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Sacramento County Departrnent of
Transportation.

Sacramento County Deparfinent of
Transportation.

City of Folsom Public Works
Departrnent
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of ttre fnst
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.
auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Sheet - Scott Road offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applican! to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Enpire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27).To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 27).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of lnprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound hairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicanf to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35).

East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway @riveway #6). Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:
> Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
3A.15-4x
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4y
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)

4.17-l
(Addendum)
71-105
7t-106
7l-107
Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Public Works
Deparfrnent
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
Prior to issuance of
phase I building
permits.

Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements. with
> Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
> Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and
> Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left tums to East Bidwell Sheet are against City policy.

The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants sigrralization. Sigrralization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future sigrral at this location is included in Folsom Plan fuea Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the hoject contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell StreeVWhite Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has programmed to relocate and sigrralize the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometic conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project's responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee.

Option A can be considered to be implemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction of the new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffrc adds five or more seconds ofdelay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Sffeet/White Rock Road intersection wittr the existing geometry. Figure 4-4 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway. hior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-5 of the Addendum):

4.17-2
(Addendum)

4.17-3
(Addendum)
71-108
7l-109
Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Public Works
Departrnent
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
the exception ofthe
second northbound
thru lane prior to
issuance ofphase I
building permits.

Construct the second
northbound thru lane
prior to issuance of
phase 2 building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with
the exception ofone
thru northbound lane
prior to issuance of
phase I building
permits. Construct
the second thru
northbound lane
prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with
the exception ofone
thru northbound lane
and one thru
southbound lane
> Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second tlru lane shall be developed 300 feet south ofthe intersection); > Southbound: One left-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper; > Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60- foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell sfteet will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.

East Bidwell StreeVSavannah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry $igure 4-6 of the Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared through-right lane with a 15O-foot taper;
> Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one ttrough lane;
> Westbound approach: One left turn lane in a 60-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one thnough lane;
> Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300- foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsigralized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy.

The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Sfeet is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization. Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkrivay. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 of theAddendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60- foot taper.

4.t7-4
(Addendum)

4.17-5
(Addendum)
71-110
7l-ltt
Resolution No. 10780
Page ll0 of125

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Public Works
Department
Utilities and Service Systems
City of Folsom Community
Development Departnent and City of
Folsom Public Works Deparhnent
prior to issuance of
phase I building
permits. Consfuct
the second thru
northbound lane and
the second thru
southbound lane
prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any
project phases.
> Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes. The second southbound through lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way.
> Westbound approach: One right turn lane, plus one left-turn lane in a 200- foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions of approval from neighboring projects.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate anticipated U-Turns. Expand or construct a signalized intersection as follows:
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and rightturns. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a lefl/U-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U-turns. > Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted standards.
(B) Channelize ttre White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound right turn requires a 365- foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right tum requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and Off-Site Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured

4.17-6
(Addendum)
3A.16-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-ttz
7t-ll3
Resolution No. 10780
Page lll ofl25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Community
Development Department and City of
Folsom Public Works Departrnent
City of Folsom Community
Development Departrnent and City of
Folsom Public Works Departnent
City of Folsom Community
Development Department and City of
Folsom Public Works Departrnent
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval of
finalmaps and
issuance of building
through payment of the City's facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40, "Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South fuea Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction.

Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrastructure and off-site force main suffrcient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity. The project applican(s) ofall project phases shall demonshate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases shall not be granted untilthe City verifies adequate SRWTP capacrty is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of any small- lot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) of that project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project- specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final subdivision map and 3A"16-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.18-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.1E-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-lt4
71-1ls
7t-tt6
Resolution No. 10780
Page l12ofl25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Community
Development Deparfrnent and City of
Folsom Public Works Deparfrnent
Additional Measures
City of Folsom Community
Development Deparfrnent
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance ofbuilding
permits for any
project phases.

Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary
approval within SPA
that would place
sensitive receptors
along roadways that
quarry trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. Highway

50. issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) ofany particular discretionary development application shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction ofthe City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure suffrcient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatnent Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected). If an off-site water treatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on-site WTP alternative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and payrng connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval of the final project map shall not be ganted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases. A certificate ofoccupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water treafrnent capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traflic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capaciW and safeW improvements required to improve the 3A.18-2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure AIR-
1-Land
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-tt7
71-118
Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
compatibility of truck taffic from the quanies with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City of Folsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance wittr CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry fuck traffic, that would be applicable wittrin the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City ofFolsom considers itselfa "responsible agency''(as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical. However, as the prefened, feasible, and intended mitigation shategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck taffic through the SPA, the City shall implemenl or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to confol.

In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or fiaffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than 296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009. March. Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version 2.2:7'), or such different threshold of simificance mandated by Resolution No. 10780
Page l14ofl25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from fuck toxic air contaminants would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffrc to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by ttre truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. Each ploject-level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers. The projectJevel analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future traffrc volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel trucks), and emission rates representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk determined by in ttre HRA exceeds 296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applican(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City ta,r revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applican(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
. Implement tiered fee planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the dispersion and filtation of mobile-source TACs associated with the adjacent roadway.

These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the tees reach maturity, which breaks the line of sight between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes. These trees should be planted before occupation of any affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe construction of potentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of these fees should be maintained through the duration ofthe quarry projects. The planting, cos! and ongoing maintenance of these hees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s).
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy of the affected residences and schools:
. equip all affected residences and school buildings developed in the SPA with High Effrciency Particle Anesting (I{EPA) filter systems at all mechanical air intake points to the interior rooms;
. use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times; . locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from roadway air pollution sources as possible; and
. develop and implement an ongoing education and maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Resolution No. 10780
Page l16 of 125

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Community
Development Department
Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary
approvalwittrin SPA
that would place
sensitive receptors
along roadways that
quarry trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. 50.

Implement East Sacranento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traflic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives ofquarry project applicants.

When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development ageement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck fraffrc from the quanies with the future urban development in the SPA and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City of Folsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teicher! DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to conhol the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry huck traffrc, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City ofFolsom considers itselfa "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-1-
Land
(rPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-ttg
Resolution No. 10780
Pagell7 ofl25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are wittrin its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or taffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of 45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive receptors to noise generated by quarry truck faffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of 3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet wittr the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost. > A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in ttre SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that are identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted using an approved three dimensional traffic noise modeling prograrn (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each projectJevel analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City of Folsom for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers.

The project-level analysis should account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the percentage of heavy hucks). If the incremental increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:

Resolution No. 10780
Page ll8 ofl25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
> Modelthe benefits of soundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected receptors not to exceed a total height of eight feet (two-foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffrc noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of rubberized asphalt at the expense of the quarry tuck applican(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City ofFolsom and fees for construction ofsaid mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s).
> Implement the installation of rubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive receptors that carry quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of taffic noise levels. The inclusion of rubberized asphalt would provide an additional 3 to 5 dB of traffic noise reduction. The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by the quarry truck applicant($. Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom.

No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or wittrin the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid. > To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy of the affected residences and schools:
. Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed constuction plans of residences adjacent to affected roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks. . Determine the interior quarry tuck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affbcted roadways compared to no quarry truck conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be necessary due to the taffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck applican(s) should pay for the cost of window package upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated windows) required to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck haffic.

Resolution No. 10780
Page ll9 ofl25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Community
Development Department and City of
Folsom Public Works Deparfrnent
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any
project phase, the
project applicant
shall demonstrate to
the City's
satisfaction the fair
share confibution
towards
implementation of
Backbone
Infrastucture and
Off-Site Water
Facility
improvements and
associated required
mitigation as
identified in the
Folsom South of U.S
Highway 50
Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
(December 2014) or
the Revised
Proposed Off-Site
Water Facility
Alternative
Addendum to the

FPASP EINEIS
To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off-Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and confibute their fair share to the backbone infrasfucture and off-site water facility alternative improvements. The project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed inthe Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Backbone Infrastrrcture Mitigated Ne gative Declaration (December 2014):
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-l: Design above ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-I: Prepare and Implement NOX Reduction Plan
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2: Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l: Conduct Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western Spadefoot Toad > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond Turtle N/A7t-120
Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
(approved December
2012); as applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's HawkNesting Habitat
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foraging Habitat
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored Blackbird > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting Raptors > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-10: Special-Status Bats > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-13: Conduct Surveys to Identiff and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section 401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Waters of ttre State
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-15: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-ll:American Badger > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property treatment plans
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treafrnent or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.

Resolution No. 10780
Page l2l of 125

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-l: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-s(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Conhol Plan for the detention basin West of Prairie City Road.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VII-I: Greenhouse Gas Emissions > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVI-I: Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffrc Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3: North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 Norttr of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V1-4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-I North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements
In addition, ttre project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed inthe Revised Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative Addendum to the FPASP EINEIS (approved December tt,2012):
> 3B.l-2a: Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural Facilities. > 3B.l-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 38.l-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 3B.l-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.

Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
> 38.2-la: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX Reduction Plan. > 38.2-lc: Implement Fugitive Dust Conhol Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during Construction.
> 38.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors. > 3B.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to Acceptable Concentrations.
> 3B.4-la: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during Construction. > 38.4-lb Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water Facilities Climate Action Plan.
> 3A.5-la: Comply with the Progammatic Ageement.
> 3A.5-lb: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatrnent Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treafrnent or Avoidance as Required.
> 3A.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 3B.7-la: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement Required Measures.
> 3B.7-lb: lncorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency Measures Into Final Pipeline Desiga.
> 38.7-4: Implement Corrosion Protection Measures.
> 38.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required. > 3B.8-la: Transport Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines. > 3B.8-lb: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials Management Plan.

Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Aligrrment.
3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.

38.8-7a: Keep Construction fuea Clear of Combustible Materials. 3B.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. 3B.9-la: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
3B.9-lb: hoperly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
3B.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for Structural Facilities. 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment.

38.1 l-la: Limit Construction Hours.
3B.l l-lb: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging. 3B.l l-lc: Maximize the Use of Noise Barriers.
3B.l l-ld: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Consfuction. 3B.l l-le: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints.

38.I I-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization Measures.

38.12-1: Provide for Continued Recreational Access as Identified in Mitigation Measure 3.14-la.

38.15-1a: Prepare Traffic Confol Plan.

38.15-lb: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions.

38.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert.

38.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions.

38. I 7- I a: Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practices. 3B.17-lb: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program. 3A.18-l: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability.

Resolution No. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate OflSite Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastucture Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

ResolutionNo. 10780

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment2
Planning Commission Staff Report
Dated December 1 ,2021

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

W
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
Type: Public Hearing
Date: December 1,2021
clTY oa
]FOILSON4I
Proiect:

File #:

Requests:

LocationlAPN:

Staff Contact:

Planning Commission Staff Report
50 Natoma Street, Council Chambers
Folsom, CA 95630
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision
PN-20-267
Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
Minor Administrative Mod ifi cation
Northwest corner of the intersection of East Bidwell Street and White Rock Road within the Folsom Plan Area/APN: 072-0060- 079, 072-0060-099, and 072-0060-1 03
Steve Banks, Principal Planner, 916461-6207
[email protected]
Property Owner/Applicant
Name: Toll Brothers West lnc.ffoll Brothers Inc
Address: 2330 East Bidwell Street, Suite 201
Folsom, CA 95630
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion recommend approval of a Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Administrative Modification for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project to the City Gouncil as illustrated on Attachments 6-16, subject to the findings (Findings A-O) and conditions of approval (Conditions 1-71) attached to this report.

Proiect Summary: The proposed project includes a request for approval of a Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for development of a 329-unit single'family residential subdivision (Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision) on a 64.7-acre site located at the northwest corner of the intersection of White Rock Road and East Bidwell Street within the Folsom Plan Area. A MinorAdministrative Modification is also proposed to transfer 92 allocated dwelling units from the project site to other locations within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

Ci$ of Folsom Page 1

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

AGENDA ITEM NO. I
Type: Public Hearing
Date: December 1,2021
crrl or
F OILS()N4I
Table of Contents:

Attachment 1 - Background and Setting
Attachment 2 - Project Description
Attachment 3 - Analysis
Attachment 4 - Conditions of Approval
Attachment 5 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 6 - lllustrative Master Plan Exhibit, dated August 31,2024 Attachment 7 - Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, dated September 17,2021 Aftachment 8 - Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, dated September 17,2021 Attachment I - Preliminary Utility Plan, dated September 17,2021 Attachment 10 - Preliminary Landscape Plan and Details, dated January 24,2020 Attachment 1 1 - Preliminary Entry Exhibit, dated April28,2021 Attachmenl12 - Preliminary Wall and Fence Exhibit, dated April28,2O21 Attachment 13 - Preliminary Tree Preservation/Removal Exhibit, dated October 13,2021 Attachment 14 - Minor Administrative Modification Exhibit, dated July, 2020 Attachment 15 - lnclusionary Housing Letter, dated November 16,2020 Attachment 16 - Project Narrative, dated September 16,2021 Aftachment 17 - Environmental Memorandum, dated September 7, 2021 Attrachment 18 - Approved Development Standards and Building Elevations for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision (Phase 1 and Phase 2) Attachment 19 - Site Photographs
Attachmentz9 - Toll Brothers Booklet (Separate Bound Document) Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Comm unity Development Director
City of Folsom Page2

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
ATTACHMENT 1

BACKGROUND AND SETTING

BACKGROUND
On March 10,2020, the Ci$ Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Development Agreement Amendments, Planned Development Permit, and lnclusionary Housing Plan for development of a 1,225-unit active adult and traditional single-family residential subdivision (Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision) on a 314-acre site located at the northwest corner of the intersection of East Bidwell Street and White Rock Road within the Folsom Plan Area. The 1,225 approved residential units associated with the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision included 590 residential units (tentative map approved) within Phase 1 of the active adult community, 421 residential units (no map approved) within Phase 2 of the active adult community, and214 single-family residential units (tentative map approved) within a traditional subdivision.

All of the entitlements referenced above apply to the entire Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project (Phase 1 and Phase 2 of active adult community and the traditional subdivision). However, it is important to point out that the Phase 2 portion of the active adult community was not mapped previously, which is why the applicant has submitted the subject SmalLlot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map application. As described previously, Phase 2 of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch active adult communi$ was approved for development with 421 unmapped residential units. However, based on a number of site constraints (topography, property shape, etc.) associated with the subject property, the applicant is only proposing development of 329 residential units within Phase 2, 92 units less than was originally anticipated.

One of the entitlements approved with the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project was a Planned Development Permit. The Planned Development Permit established specific development standards and architectural designs for the active adult portion of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision. Approved modifications to the development standards, which were tailored to meetthe specific needs of the active adult community, included increasing the maximum allowable lot coverage, reducing the minimum required garage setbacks, and reducing the minimum required rear yard setbacks. ln relation to architecture and design, five different product lines with three single-story master plans were approved for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision. The approved master plans feature four distinct architectural themes that were chosen from the traditional heritage of Galifornia home styles including ltalian Villa, Spanish Colonial, Modern Craftsman, and Modern Farmhouse. The approved development standards, building renderings, and building elevations for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision are included as Attachment 18 to this staff report.

City of Folsom Page 3

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
On Octobet7,2020, the Planning Commission approved a Design Review application for development of an 18,600-square-foot single-story clubhouse building with associated recreational amenities on a S-acre site located within the Phase 1 portion of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision. ln terms of recreational amenities, the approved clubhouse facility included an indoor swimming pool, an outdoor swimming pool, a spa, a fitness center, a social hall, multipurpose rooms, pickle ballcourts, bocce ballcourts, a putting green, and loungc arcas.

SETTING
The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of East Bidwell Street and \Mrite Rock Road within the Folsom Plan Area.

The proposed project is located on a 64.7-acre site situated within the central portion of the previously approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision. The project site is largely undeveloped with the exception of a small area that is being utilized to stockpile materials associated with development of the Phase 1 portion of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project. Figures 1 and 2 below and on the follovving page show an aerial photograph of the location of the project within the Folsom Plan Area and the location of the project on the approved Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

FIGURE 1: FOLSOM PIAN AREA AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH EXHIBIT
Slte
Ci$ of Folsom Page 4

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 SuMivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
FIGURE 2: FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN EXHIBIT
I
ii
II
r' (
/]"
ir
c
turtridhr.hsrAidnrb.J'dt $rrd&{FrsordD.!&.rlfiienb hdbfr.lr. *.ulMq
kdishhrt
.at-!#/r$3ldItFtuilnh.lldrcoFdt.wrlr&llrr!lrtdr6l*rdbnld(*alt{tllMblF-hrttrt ual&rtd6lM
&dtrdro&sdryr rrr!6rdtrrrhhhb
I
3 Ib
$
r-_lsI,
-+'
berd
, Ft{t(
ie6 i -:{
, :., ite:le l.:a* Eeg
. 11,401 DU
,. 27.t40 Populellon
i r 6.€ du/ac Average oentlly:. 2.8m OsF commerclal
f,'olsom Plan Area Specific Plan
2011 I 2U2O Entitlements
Rrl!.dr &ly, 1020
h.rhrtr.lw.S.@rlsr-ra
crrtutq.dlb.k
slowrrlord
t&tbb**b
krtndq-tdft
&llltrraFcrdlryrlroMltffi
attalryrrtrr&ts
bi!&lr&rt
City of Folsom Page 5

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
ATTACHMENT 2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
The applicant, Toll Brothers lnc., is requesting approval of a Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Administrative Modification for development of a 329-unit single-family residential subdivision on a64.7-acre site located at the northwest corner of the intersection of East Bidwell Street and White Rock Road within the Folsom Plan Area.

The proposed Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map will result in the creation of a total of 348 lots including 329 residential lots, 14 landscape lots, 3 open space lots, 1 dog park lot, and 1 private recreation lot, The proposed subdivision includes an attached townhome product with lots that are 43'x 80' (3,440 SF) in size, and a detached single- family product with lots that are 50' x 90' (4,500 SF), 55' x 95' (5,225 SF), and 65' x 95' (6,175 SF) in size respectively. A land use summary is shown below and the proposed Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is shown on the following page.

TABLE 1: LAND USE SUMMARY
Land tlse Summary
GP SP Ownerdllp,
Oodonauon Dsdonadon tilainl€nanca
owolllng' Acros Acrog
Land UBe ljnltr Gros Net
Net
ttondtv
(Acliw Adult)
(Achw Adult)
(Acim Aduru
SFHD SPSFHD-PO Homgowner Single-Family High Dsnsity Resrd€ntial 71 55 7 51 7 50 MLD
SFHO
SFHO
SFHD
os
SFHD
SP-MtO-PO Homewoner
SP.SFHO-PD, HOA
SP-SFHO.PD, HOA
SP-SFHD.PD. HOA

SPOS HOA
SP-SFHD-PD Orly
Mulli-Family Low Density Residential
Townhomes
Pri\als Recra€tion
Dog Park
Landscape
Open Space / Lsndscspo (Me6turo W)
OP€n SPac€
1m
86 72 8.2 4.2
12 05

2.3 03

0.01 05

8.8 (Achr€ Adull)
A 00
00 00
03 001Space (Lot S)
ROW 5
City of Folsom Page 6

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
FIGURE 3: SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
I
ria--,\-=
;')
tl.

GrEid.
rl,ll
O-+-
I
I
I
'
(
--l ';&
tsr .s. 4 idr'n {(
---5-
tirs,r_i,rtEt I lu;,tl I
-EEt". I ---.{
* cl*+- o-+:=
r.*i# vrsrrruc,r*tPo11l)r"r?,t#u,uo* u'o,
':.:.:.: 'l
IOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
PHASE 2
' 0fil(rya6wl :-
Primary vehicle access to the project site is provided by Regency Parkway, which will connect to East Bidwell Street to the east and Mangini Parkway to the north. lnternal vehicle circulation is proposed to be provided by a series of residential streets, all of which directly or indirectly tie into Regency Parkway. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation is provided by a combination of detached sidewalks, attached sidewalks, Class I bicycle trails, Class ll bicycle lanes, and connections to nearby future Class I bicycle trails.

Parking will be accommodated by two-car off-street garages associated with each of the residentialunats and on-street parking. Additionalsite improvements include underground utilities, site lighting, site landscaping, retaining walls, sound walls, fencing, and project identification signs. Off-site improvements include construction of two off-site hydromodification basins (Basins No. 5 and No. 16) located to the west and north of the projecrt site respectively. The Master Plan Exhibit for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Ci$ of Folsom Page 7

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Gommission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
Subdivision and the proposed street sections are shown below and on the following pages.

FIGURE 4: TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH MASTER PI.AN EXHIBIT irY
J
'.r{,J
o,iffu
-t
:r
.:,
'. r}.ri'!
)
{aaal!'
tl dtto,lal
llortglt3
rt tt2(bhfl Acltv. ldrl Ccmunltl
ttoilacv at roBof tlllcflfltatt I(lcltv. A.i|l Cqtm{,twl o 'drq-'reaat- &
l!61re[vt tl{lj tirn arhlul
tou. SRotH:Rs al toutollt eallcH
Qdh aglrfr
ToIIBtotherssg*r'!avrm#aMa
0tilflgcE
Fq*l I
lLFs
City of Folsom Page I

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivlslon (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
FIGURE 5: REGENCY PARKWAY STREET SECTION
i$flrnYrurL
AIftSDII{O?l
ttr nfiv
40 RIGHT.OF.WAY
Local Road wllh Oaea ll Blke Lanes
Regency Parl$ay
(No Paltlng)
f,il'
FIGURE 6: LOCAL ROADWAY STREET SECTION
It?E r ctc(lrP,l
R rlt R/W
* ffPUEA0H0ENTTOiT.D
44'RIGHT.OF-WAY
Local Road - Attached Sldewalk
(Parklng Both Sides)
|rrt
{np,t
UETNE
tfitcto
fil?t
s. tnE
'{.1.
iflf,'tfl;' tlf,r, tca' re ' nftE'
Jr sm I ulc ur€
tlrc ffi
CW of Folsom Page I

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
A Minor Administrative Modification is also proposed to transfer g2 allocated dwelling units from the project site to other locations within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

The Minor Administrative Amendment Exhibit is shown in Figure 7 below.

FIGURE 7: MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT EXHIBIT
.ii
t
FSlAt
& Brc(r:&
I
-_. I .\rahhb
i",F''
LntS
ttatatna4pe
,l.i
t& aittrffge,rtrar($'r&ala
-+'
L.gcnd
FPISP Pd t{r&,I t6..tltltt md.a)
Drvelling Unit Alhrcation
Folsom Plrn Area Specific Plan
fi=;-Utnl$Dt kriedr{,r.r
:'5-..4'...'::

City of Folsom Page 10

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
ATTACHIT'IENT 3

ANALVSIS
The following sections provide an analysis of the applicant's proposal.

A. General Plan and Zoning Consistency
B. Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
C. Traffic/Access/Circulation
D. Parking
E. Noise lmpacts
F. Walls/Fencing
G. Measure W and Open Space
H. Private Park Amenities
l. Oak Tree Preservation and Removal
J. lnclusionary Housing Plan
K. Minor Administrative Modification
This section also includes a discussion of the project's performance with relation to relevant policies in the Folsom General Plan and the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan L. Conformance with Relevant Folsom General Plan Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Objectives and Policies
A. General Plan and Zoning Consistency
The 64.7-acre project site has General Plan land use designations of SFHD (Single- Family High Density), MLD (Multi-Family Low Density), and OS (Open Space) and Specific Plan designations of SP-SFHD-PD (Specific Plan-Single-Family High Density- Planned Development Permit District), SP-MLD-PD (Specific Plan-Multi-Family Low Density-Planned Development Distric't), and SP-OS (Specific Plan-Open Space). The project is consistent with both the General Plan and the Specific Plan land use designations, as single-family attached and single-family detached residential units are identified as permitted land uses within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP, Table A.1). The proposed project, which will be developed with 5.0 (SFHD) and 8.8 (MLD) dwelling units per acre respectively, is also consistent with the allowable density ranges (4 to 7 and 7 to 12 dwelling units per acre) established by the General Plan (Table LU-1:

Residential Designations) and the FPASP. ln addition, the proposed project is consistent with the development standards established for the Toll Brotherc at Folsom Ranch Subdivision.

Ci$ of Folsom Page 1 1

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,202'l
B. Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
As described in the project description, the proposed project includes a request for approval of a SmalLlot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to create of a total of 348 lots including 329 residential lots, 14 landscape lots, 3 open space lots, 1 dog park lot, and 1 private recreation lot. The proposed residentials lots would be of varying dimensions and sizes as described in the table below:

TABLE 2; TOLL BROTHERS PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION LOT DISTRIBUTION TABLE All roadways (streets and courts) within the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project are proposed to be private streets and are consistent with the street standards established by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan. Staff recommends that public utility easements be provided for all public utilities located within the private streets to the satisfaction of the Comrnunity Development Department. Condition No. 6 is included to reflect this requirement.

Staff has determined that the proposed Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map complies with all City requirements, as well as with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act.

C. Traffic/Access/Circulation
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan established a series of plans and policies for the circulation system within the entire Plan Area. The FPASP circulation system was designed with a sustainable community focus on the movement of people and provides a number of mobility alternatives such as walking, cycling, carpooling, and viable forms of public transportation in addition to vehicular circulation. The circulation plan evaluated regional travel, both in terms of connectivity and capacity as well as local internal connections and access.

The 2011 Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Environmental lmpact ReporUEnvironmental lmpact Statement included not only a detailed analysis of traffic-related impacts within the Plan Area, but also an evaluation of traffic-related impacts on the surrounding communities. ln total, there are fifty-five (55) traffic-related mitigation measures associated with development of the FPASP which are included as conditions of approval Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision Lot Distribution Product
Tvpe
GP
Desiqnation
SP
Desisnation
Dwelling
Units
Lot
Dimensions
Lot
Sizes
Sinole-Familv SFHD SP.SFHD.PD 89 50'bv 95' 4.500 sF
Sinqle-Familv SFHD SP-SFHD.PD 98 55'bv 95' 5,225 SF
Sinqle-Familv SFHD SP.SFHD.PD 70 65'bv 95' 6.175 SF
Townhome MLD SP.MLD-PD 72 42'bv 80' 3,440 SF
City of Folsom Page 12

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project. Many of these mitigation measures are expected to reduce traffic impacts to East Bidwell Street. lncluded among the mitigation measures are requirements to;fund and construct roadway improvements within the Plan Area, pay fair-share contribution for construction of improvements north of U.S. Highway 50, participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program, and Participate in the U.S. Highway 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association.

The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project is subject to all traffio- related mitigation measures required by the 2011 FPASP EIR/EIS.

On November 11, 2019, T.KEAR Transportation Planning & Management completed a Transportation lmpact Study for the previously approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project to determine whether additional impacts would occur that were not previously identified and addressed by the 2011 FPASP EIR/EIS and the 2015 Westland- Eagle Specific Plan Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS. This Study analyzed traffic operations at 19 intersections, three arterial roadway segments, and the U.S. Highway 50 Freeway under four scenarios: Existing Conditions, Existing Plus Project Conditions, Existing Plus Planned and Approved Projects Conditions (EPPAP), Existing Plus Planned and Approved Projects Plus Project Conditions (EPPAP Plus Project). ln addition, a cumulative analysis was prepared to evaluate the ultimate lane and geometry requirements at street intersections internal and adjacent to the project site.

The Study determined that the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project (including a\!1,225 +/- dwelling units in Regency Phase 1, Regency Phase 2, and Future Traditional Subdivision) would generate approximately 6,716 daily vehicle trips including 439 vehicle trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 557 vehicle trips during the weekday PM peak hour. The Study also determined that, with planned street and intersection improvements, the project would not create any new significant impacts under Existing Plus Project Conditions or EPPAP Plus Project Conditions when compared to the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Westland-Eagle Specific Plan Amendment Addendum. ln addition, all arterial and freeway study segments were found to operate at acceptable levels of service both with and without the project under all study scenarios.

The Study also concluded that with the proposed improvements, the project does not create any new significant deficiencies under Existing Plus Project Conditions or EPPAP Plus Project Conditions. Table 5 and Figure 10 summarize required on-site and otf-site street intersection improvements and associated timing of those improvements. No new mitigation measures are needed, although the 2019 Study includes recommendations that phase the ultimate improvements originally identified in the traffic analysis for the FPASP. The Figure on the following page includes the locations and a summary of the required roadway improvements associated with the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project.

Cig of Folsom Page 13

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December'1,2021
FIGURE 7: LOCATIONS AND SUMMARY OF REQUIRED ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS
As mentioned in the project description section of this staff report, primary vehicle access to the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision site will be provided by Regency Parkway, which will connect to East Bidwell Street to the east and Mangini Parkway to the north. lnternal vehicle circulation is proposed to be provided by a series of residential streets, all of which directly or indirectly tie into Regency Parkway. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation are provided by a combination of detached sidewalks, attached sidewalks, Class I bicycle trails, Class ll bicycle lanes, and connections to nearby future Glass I bicycle trails.

A majority of the required roadway improvements associated with the overallToll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision will be constructed with development of the first phase (Phase 1) of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision. However, there are still a number of required roadway improvements that will need to be constructed with the proposed project (Phase 2) including the following:

RAflCHIXAV
SAVAr{[Alt fl(lYY'- ''' ,l
- tno,lcino^o
rr'..(
*1
I morsr
I rio0ostom$il(n{r$
DllGtwt{Cnt s€
@ sruovonweunv
@ nuormosrcnor
r cunffMio o
. Dl ttNlonoAo
o :iiil;[''ri:i'ffi"
c
{)
@ xlsJrils,Ysi.o".
@ lrorar,rzr
Irl:lrng lrl,rigttlon 2
IPAP Mirigalion 7
oR slGt{At-tzE
Exlilng Mltigrtion r
EPAP Mirigolion 6
'OR
tEFTTURilS
EPAP Miliqa{ion 5
@ srcr.lnlrze
f rl,.rr j.r Mitigalior' !
tPAP Mlligntion 8
@ frJllrrq,rfR,on,

FOR LEFTIURNS
tP P Mitigdt,on I
@ srcrnlrzr
Ex tlr1,t 1.1 lrtition a
EPAP Miligation 10
City of Folsom Page 14

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
Reoency Parkwav (Segment 2)
. Construct Regency Parl$vay as a two-lane roadway from Street F to the planned bridge over creek at the western edge of the Regency Phase 1 Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.

Reoencv Parkwav (Segment 3)
o Construct Regency Parkway as a two-lane roadway from the eastern edge of the planned bridge over the creek bisecting the project site to Mangini Parkway.

Manoini Parkway/Regency Parhrav (Driveway 3)
. Construct driveway as shown in (Figure 47 of the November 20,2419 Transportation lmpact Study):

East Bidwell StreeUReqencv Parkway (Driveway 6)
o Modiff driveway as shown in (Figure 51 of the November 20, 2019, Transportation lmpact Study), unless intersection has been signalized:

Reqencv Phase 2 lntemalStop Control
. Stop Control shall be installed at any internal Regency Phase 2 intersections with four (or more) legs as directed by the City Engineer. Roundabouts may replace stop controlat internal intersections with authorization from the City Engineer.

East Bidwell StreeUManoini Parkwav
r Expand the intersection and update signal configuration as follows (Figure 57 of the November 20, 2019 Transportation lmpact Study):

East Bidvuell SUAlder Creek Parkwav
o Reconstruct and modiff signal at the East Bidwell StreeUAlder Creek Parkway intersection as shown in Figure 59 of the November 20, 2019, Transportation lmpact Study:

East Bidwell StreeUSavannah Padway
r Reconstruct the East Bidwell StreeUSavannah Pkwy intersection with the fof lowing geometry (Figure 61 of the November 20, 2019, Transportation lmpact Study):

The aforementioned roadway improvements are included as conditions of approvalfor development of the proposed project (Condition Nos. 19-26).

City of Folsom Page 15

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Gommission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December'|.,2021
D. Parking
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan requires that single-family residential units located within a Single-Family High Density (SFHD) designated area provide two covered parking spaces per unit. The FPASP does not require a specific amount of on-street guest parking spaces for single-family residential units within an SFHD designated area. The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan also requires that single-family residential units (townhome product) located within a Multi-Family Low Density (MLD) designated area provide two covered parking spaces per unit. The FPASP also requires that single-family residential units located within an MLD designated area provide a minimum of 0.8 guest parking spaces per unit,
Each of the single-family residential units within the SFHD designated areas and each of the single-family units (townhome product) within the MLD designated areas will include an attached two-car attached garage, thus meeting the covered parking requirement of the FPASP. ln addition, the project (includes combination of single-family units and townhome units) provides a minimum of 0.8 on-street guest parking spaces, thus meeting the on-street guest parking requirement established by the FPASP.

E. Noise lmpacts
A supplemental Environrnental Noise Assessment was previously prepared by Bollard Acoustical in order to verify that there would be no new noise-related impacts associated with the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project that were not contemplated and addressed by the 2011 FPASP EIR/EIS and the 2015 Westland-Eagle Specific Plan Amendment Addendum.

The purpose of the supplemental Noise Assessment was to quantiff future noise levels at the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project site which would be generated by traffic on nearby existing and proposed roadways and by construction occurring within the Toll Brothers site, and to compare those noise levels against the noise standards established by the Noise Element in the City's General Plan.
ln addition, the Assessment evaluated compliance of the proposed project with the FPASP EIR/EIS noise mitigation measures. The Assessment determined that portions of the proposed Toll Brothers project located adjacent to major roadways will be exposed to future traffic noise levels in excess of the City of Folsom exterior (60 Dba) noise level standard. To achieve compliance with the required exterior noise level standard, staff recommends that the following measures be implemented:
o Solid noise barriers or similar natural features (earthen berms, etc.) shall be constructed adjacent to Oak Avenue Parkway, Mangini Parkway, White Rock Road, and East Bidwell Street to reduce future traffic noise levels to below the Cig of Folsom exterior criteria of 60 dB Ldn at the proposed residential backyards.

Barrier heights are specified relative to backyard elevations, and vary from 6 feet City of Folsom Page 16

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
to I feet in height as shown in Figure 4 of the Noise Assessment (and as shown in Figure 11 on the following page).

Mechanicalventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences within the Toll Brothers project to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

FIGURE 8: NOISE MITIGATION LOCATION MAP
E
6 E
iE
Eu
Manglni Parkway
t-,
b.
e
c
E
5 I
I
ll. I
Roct f,oodWhtto
Legild
-
g_fd r.nw&,*gr€r
-
,.f(d l.t W Noro 8dr.,
-
OFbtTrludNo*gom'
Up. tb. SIC l? Wdd &@.Fal
A
r--------------
Toll Broth€rs at Folsom Ranch
Folsom, Califomia
Silo Pton lnd Nor6o Milllpltor Locolbr6
Figure 4 J totlAaD
\ "F^-i;iil;;T'
The Assessment also determined that the proposed project complies and is consistent with the noise requirements established by the FPASP EIR|/EIS and that there would not be an increase in the severity of noise-related impacts compared to the significance determination contained in the FPASP EIR/EIS. ln addition to the noise measures recommended above, the proposed project is subject to the noise mitigation measures identified within the 2011 FPASP EIR/EIS and the 2015 Westland-Eagle Specific Plan Amendment Addendum.

F. Walls/Fencing
The applicant is proposing to secure and screen the project site with a combination of walls and fences as shown in Figure I on the following page. A split-face block wall is proposed around the perimeter of the project, generally six feet in height but increasing o
City of Folsom Page 17

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
up to 8 feet in height to implement recommended noise reductions measures (see the discussion of Noise, earlier in this report).

Private yard areas for the individual residential lots are proposed to be screened by a combination of wood fencing, open-view fencing, and masonry walls. The wood fencing will be utilized for the interior side yards, street side yards, and rear yards of the residential lots. The open-view fencing will be utilized for the rear yards on residential lots located adjacent to open space areas (where noise mitigation is not required). Masonry walls will be installed at various locations throughout the project site to minimize potential noise and privacy concerns.

Figure 9: WALL AND FENCE EXHIBIT
(I(ilr.t,
r - - -. (.94dll olat. nrrr
a---a t t! tardli
e wArr ANo f€NcE coNc€Pl
IOIt SROIHERS A1 TOLSOM RANCHt
1 G. Measure W and Open Space
ln 2004, the City of Folsom electorate voted in favor of Measure W, which was an amendment to the City Charter regarding local control of the Folsom Plan Area south of U.S. Highway 50. Measure W included seven major components including: water supply, transportation, open space, schools, development plan, public notice, and implementation.

City of Folsom Page 18

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2A21
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan complied with each of the aforementioned components through the provision of at least 30o/o open space, adoption of a transportation infrastructure funding and phasing plan, identification and securing of a water souroe, submission of a funding and construction plan for school facilities to the FCUSD, adoption of a General Plan Amendment for the Plan Area, conducting a comprehensive series of public meetings and hearings, and adoption of the required documents (lncludlng CEOA) to approve the FPASP.

The approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project increased the amount of Measure W open spaoe from 83.9 acres to 86.1 acres, and is consistent with the FPASP, and thus is in compliance with the requirements of Measure W. The proposed Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project will not result in any changes with respect to Measure W open spaoe.

H. Private Padr Amenities
As shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision includes two private park amenities. The first private park amenity is a O.5-acre dog park which is located on the north side of Regency Parkway in the eastern portion of the project site. The second private park amenity, which is a 1 .Z-acre park area that will feature a large grass amphitheater, is located on the south side of Regency Parkway in the western portion of the project site. The applicant is proposing to construct the dog park prior to issuance of the 640th building permit and the amphitheater park prior to issuance of the 830th building permit for the overall Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision.
l. Oak Tree Preservation and Removal
As required by the City of Folsom Charter, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan preserves thirty percent of the Plan Area in perpetual open space that will encompass valuable natural resources such as oak woodlands. The FPASP uses the California Oak Woodland Conservation Act of 2001definition of oak woodlands as "oak stands with a greater than 10% canopy cover.' The oak woodlands, isolated oak tree canopy, and individual oak trees within the Plan Area are exclusively located in the western section (west of East Bidwell Street) and consist of 642-acres of oak woodland habitat with a canopy cover al 249-acres (approximately 397o canopy cover). Additionally, the Plan Area contains 10-acres of isolated oak tree canopy that is not classified as oak woodlands because it has less than 10% canopy cover. Figure 10 on the following page illustrates the location of the blue oak woodlands and individual oak trees within the Folsom Plan Area and also within the boundaries of the project site.

City of Folsom Page 19

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
FIGURE 10: FPASP OAK WOODLAND PRESERVE EXHIBIT
lI.,nr I MR{rrrdr L 9\'^{a!r lI\rn
JI
.--.{ F
-1.,
-?\
o
t'
rF-'!i .'/.s -."'I=-
rr{ €,.

I
:J
iu]Il.'i.!,},:J
I J-. lI,4jl4l.til9 J.ii L{.J.ltt, ?
a.kJ7 t c !. t) r ta : : i :.aa.9,:i.crf rt:: ror\!r, :ior iror:ri!lr.:rr:srfrrclri:rrrJrl. . -;ll,, ",','',,.''',,,,,,* ,',, + ;isir-
The FPASP includes a number of oak woodlands and isolated oak tree mitigation objectives and policies to ensure the preservation of large expanses of oak woodlands within the Folsom Plan Area. However, the FPASP also recognizes that required infrastructure to accommodate development will result in unavoidable impacts to oak woodlands and isolated oak trees. ln particular, the FPASP identified approximately 121- acres of unavoidable oak woodland impacts for construction of Plan Area backbone infrastructure. ln addition, approximately 1'14-acres of potential oak woodland impacts were identified by the FPASP in conjunction with construction on residential and non- residential parcels in the Plan Area. Lastly, the FPASP identified approximately 8.41- acres of isolated oak tree canopy that may be impacted by construction of backbone infrastructure as well as development on residential and non-residential parcels in the Plan Area.

As mentioned previously, the overallToll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision includes oak woodland, isolated oak tree canopy, and individual oak trees that are scattered throughout the grassland community. As part of approval of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project, the open space (included oak woodland) boundary in the central portion of the project site was adjusted resulting in an overall increase of open space from 83.9 acres to 86.1 acres. Figure 1 1 on the following page shows the approved Tree Preservation/Removal Plan for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision.

City of Folsom Page 20

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
Figure 11: TREE PRESERVATION/REMOVAL PLAN
The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project site features a total of 27 oak trees including 14 oak trees which are proposed to be removed due to excessive cut and fill conditions (+/- 5 feet), I oak trees which are proposed to be removed due to poor health and structure, and 5 trees which are proposed to be preserved. The proposed Tree Preservation/Tree Removal Plan is shown in Figure 12 on the following page and in the larger scale Toll Brothers Booklet (Attachment 20). teltt\I\\r\ tttt PQt\tr\ \txr\ Rl\xr\-\t Pl.\\\ lSll\r, ll \t \ll\l StllDl\lS[,\ U\l' Tollffinch
F"!dlliaMq'wl{|tl,
City of Folsom Page21

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
I
a
........:::
+!t+tJ
ndl
lltlllL-
O t'i:'ii ;i;'i1i';3; -""*
A ,, r.rdrr h,dru... tr,-Ii/ rr.sst.il..uru. N.
rq{.,h{rdIn rt
FEE,*,"^,-""*'-",
" Tr.t l+lscvntion / Rcaxtdl E\hihit
-iiffiiffi
at Folsom Ranch
Phase 2
i3'..'i* Iln[....::

Figure 12: TREE PRESERVATION/REMOVAL PLAN
As described earlier within this report, the topography of the project site is quite varied with slopes varying between 0 percent and 15 percent and elevations ranging from 326 feet to 399 feet above sea level. As a result, a significant amount of grading is required within the development areas with cuts of up to 51 feet and fills up to 34 feet, making it challenging to preserve oak trees throughout many portions of the project site. That being said, City staff worked closely with the applicant in an effort to preserve as many oak trees as possible on the project site. A direct result of this coordination is the preservation of 5 oak trees including a prominent 35-inch diameter oak tree (Tree No. 62) which will be located in a landscape median at the project entrance off of Mangini Parkway. A photograph of this 3S-inch diameter oak tree is shown on the following page:

Ci$ of Folsom Page22

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
FIGURE 13: PHOTOGRAPH OF OAK TREE AT PROJECT ENTRANCE
As required by the FPASP EIR/EIS (Mitigation Measure 3A.3-5), the applicant is required to submit an Oak Tree Mitigation Plan consistent with the approved Oak Tree Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the FPASP to mitigate for impacts to the individual oak trees and isolated oak tree canopy areas located on the project site, To mitigate for the impact to the individual or isolated oak trees, staff recommends that the following measure be implemented (Condition No. 49):
o
o
A Tree Permit Application containing an application form, justification statement, site map, preservation program, and arborist's report shall be submitted to the City of Folsom by the owner/applicant for issuance of a Tree Permit prior to commencement of any grading or site improvement activities.

A Mitigation Plan shall be prepared by the owner/applicant to mitigate for the removal of the protected lsolated Oak Trees within the development site. The Mitigation Plan for the lsolated Oak Trees shall consist of replacement trees and/or payment of "ln- Lieu" fees on a diameter inch bases consistent with 10-14, 10-15 of the FPASP.

Ci$ of Folsom Page 23

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
Replacement trees may be located within the boundaries of the development parcel, a natural parkway, landscape corridor or passive or preserve open space zone, preferably within the Folsom Plan Area. The Mitigation Plan for the lsolated Oak Trees shall be subject to review and approval by the City.

The Conservation Areas shall be fenced prior to construction. ln addition, oak trees to bc preserved within the Passive Recreation Open Spacee ehall be fenced with high visibility fencing prior to starting construction. The fencing shall be installed outside the tree preservation zone of oak trees, and shall surround the entirety of the tree preservation zone area. Parking of vehicles, equipment, or storage of materials is prohibited within the Tree Protection Zone of Protected Trees at alltimes. Signs shall be posted on exclusion fencing stating that the enclosed trees are to be preserved.

Signs shall state the penalty for damage to, or removal of, the protected tree.

The owner/applicant shall retain an ISA certified project arborist for implementation of the project. The project arborist shall be responsible for overseeing onsite tree removal and tree preservation. Oak trees located adjacent to construction areas that may be indirectly impacted due to work within or near the Tree Protection Zone shall be identified and tagged by the project arborist during construction activities. The indirectly impacted trees shall be monitored by the project arborist for five years in accordance with the Conceptual Oak Plan and FPASP EIR/EIS Mitigation Measure 3A.3-5. Trees that appear to be dead or dying within five years of project implementation will be replaced as per the requirements of this Plan. a
a
J. lnclusionary Housing Plan
As permitted by the City's lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, the applicant is proposing to meet their inclusionary housing requirement by providing an in-lieu fee payment (Attachment 15). The in-lieu fee payment is calculated by multiplying one percent of the lowest priced for-sale residential unit within the proposed subdivision by the total number of for-sale residential units within the proposed subdivision. The in-lieu fee is payable at the time of the building permit on a per-unit basis.

Staff recommends that the Final Inclusionary Housing Plan be approved by the City Council and that subsequently the Inclusionary Housing Agreement be approved by the City Attorney and executed prior to recordation of the Small-Lot Final Subdivision Map.

Condition No. 55 is included to reflect these requirements.

K. MinorAdministrativeModification
The proposed project includes a request for approval of a Minor Administrative Modification (Attachment 14) for the transfer of development rights to move 92 allocated dwelling units from the project site (Parcels 172Aand 1728) to four other parcels (Parcels 19ts,26,27, and 58) located within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

City of Folsom Page24

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
The FPASP permits flexibility in making minor adjustments to land use locations and parcel boundaries and also with regard to transferring residential unit allocations to reflect changing market demand. \Mth respect to transferring residential unit allocations, the FPASP states that "the City shall approve residential dwelling unit allocation transfers or density adjustments between any Plan Area resident land parcel or parcels, provided the following conditions are met":

The transferor and transferee parcel or parcels are located in the Plan Area and are designated for residential use.

The transferor and transferee parcel or parcels conform to all applicable development standards contained in Appendix A - Development Standards.

The transfer of units does not result in increased impacts beyond those identified in the FPASP ElRlElS.

The transfer of units does not adversely impact planned infrastructure, roadways, schools, or other public facilities; affordable housing agreements; or fee programs and assessment districts; unless such impacts are reduced to an acceptable level th roug h project-specifi c m itig ation measu res.

Based on staffs review, the proposed reallocation of 92 residential units from the project site to other parcels within the Folsom Plan Area, meets all of the required criteria mentioned above, As a result, staff is able to approve the proposed MinorAdministrative Modification.

L. Gonformance with Relevant General Plan and Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Objectives and Policies
The following is a summary analysis of the project's consistency with the Ctty's General Plan and with key policies of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

GP and SP OBJEGTIVE H-{ rHousingl
To provide an adequate supply of suitable sites for the development of a range of housing types to meet the housing needs of all segments of the population.

GP and SP POLICY H-1.1
The City shall ensure that sufficient land is designated and zoned in a range of residential densities to accommodate the City's regional share of housing.

Analysis: The City provides residential lands at a variety of residential densities as specified in the General Plan and in the Folsom MunicipalCode.

The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan includes specialized zoning (Specific Plan Designations) that are customized to the Plan Area as adopted in 2011 and as Amended over time. The FPASP provides residential lands at o
a
a
City of Folsom Page 25

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
densities ranging from 1-4 dwelling unit per acre (SF), 4-7 dwelling units per acre (SFHD),7-12 dwelling units per acre (MLD\, 12-20 dwelling units per acre (MMD), 20-30 dwelling units per acre (MHD), and 9-30 dwelling units per acre (MU).

The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision projecL which is designated SFHD, MLD, and OS in the General Plan, is proposed to be developed at residential densities of 5.0 units per acre (SFHD) and 8.8 units per acre (MLD) respectively, which is consistent with the allowable density ranges (SFHD: 4-7 DUlAcre, MLD: 7-l2DUlAcre) established bythe General Plan (Table LU-1: Residential Designations)
SP POLICY 4.1
Create pedestrian-oriented neighborhoods through the use of a grid system of streets where feasible, sidewalks, bike paths and trails. Residential neighborhoods shall be linked, where appropriate, to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel.

Analvsis: The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project is based on a roadway system that provides connectivity between the residential, open space, and private recreation land uses within the project area. Biking and walking within the project area is facilitated by a series of Class I bicycle trails, Class ll bicycle lanes, street-separated sidewalks and street-attached sidewal ks.

The overall Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project has an extensive planned trailsystem that is linked to and consistent with the overall trail system within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan The planned trail system was previously reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and by the City Council. The proposed Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project is not making any modifications to the previously approved trail system for the subdivision.

SP POLICY 4.3
Residential neighborhoods that are directly adjacent to open space shall provide at least two defined points of pedestrian access into the open space area.

Analvsis: The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project includes multiple pedestrian access points to the open space areas within the project. ln addition, trail connections will be provided to Mangini Parkway, East Bidwell Street, and White Rock Road, as well as to internal roadways within the project.

SP POLICY 4.4
Provide a variety of housing opportunities for residents to participate in the home- ownership market.

Ci$ of Folsom Page 26

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
Analvsis: The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan provides home ownership opportunities within the SF (Single-Family), SFHD (Single-Family High Density), and MLD (Multi-Family Low Density) land use designated areas.

Residentialdevelopment in the MLD (MultLFamily Low Density), MMD (Multi-Family Medium Density), MHD (Multi-Family High Density) and MU (Mixed-Use) land use categories may provide 'for rent' opportunities; however, home ownerehip may also be accommodated in 'for sale'condos, townhomes, etc. at the time of development of these particular parcels.

The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project is consistent with this policy in that it will provide home ownership opportunities and potential rental opportunities within the SFHD and MlD-zoned parcels. sP POLTCY 4.6
As established by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the total number of dwelling units for the Plan A.rea shall not exceed 11 ,461. The number of units within individual land use parcels may vary, so long as the number of units falls within the allowable density range for a particular land use designation.

Analysis: There have been a number of Specific Plan Amendments approved by the City Council within the Folsom Plan Area, which has generally led to an increase in residentially zoned land and a decrease in commercially zoned land. As a result, the number of residential units within the Plan Area increased from 10,210 to 11,461. The various Specific Plan Amendment ElRs and Addenda analyzed impacts from the conversion of the commercial lands to residential lands; impacts and associated mitigations measures can be found in the individual project-specific environmental documents. The increase in population was analyzed and can be accommodated in the excess capacity of the school sites provided in the Plan Area.

The proposed project does not result in any change in total dwelling units in the FPASP. The reallocation of the 92 dwelling units associated with the proposed Minor Administrative Modification to other parcels within the Folsom Plan Area will not exceed the allowable density for any of the impacted parcels.

SP POLICY 4.9
Subdivisions of 200 dwelling units or more not immediately adjacent to a neighborhood or community park are encouraged to develop one or more local parks as needed to provide convenient resident access to children's play areas, picnic areas, and unprogrammed turf areas. lf provided, these local parks shall be maintained by a landscape and lighting district or homeowner's association and shall not receive or provide substitute park land dedication credit for parks required by the FPASP.

City of Folsom Page27

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
Analvsis: At the time that the FPASP was adopted in 201 1, the City Council directed that there be fewer but larger parks in the FPASP so that it would be more efficient for the City to program and maintain these parks (as opposed to smaller parks dispersed throughout the Plan Area). To that end, the FPASP was approved with two (2) large community parks approximately 20-50 acres in size that have a general service radius of 1.0 mile (Gommunity Park West and Gommunity Park East). Additionally, six (6) neighborhood parks were provided which are approximately 7-10 acres in size and have a service radius of 0.5 miles.

The previously approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project included amendments to the FPASP to shift approximately ten acres of public parkland to other parts of the Specific Plan because the Toll Brothers project is proposed as a gated, private community. A total of 7.5-acres of private park and recreation facilities will be provided within the Toll Brothers project which would be open to residents of the project but would not be available to the general public. (Approximately 86 acres of Measure W open spae, traversed by public trails, would also be provided within the Toll Brothers project.). The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project includes a 1.5- acre private park amenity and a O.2-acre dog park amenity, both of which are included in the 7.S-acres of private park amenities referenced above.

SP POLICY 4.15
Thirty percent (30%) of the Plan Area shall be preserved and maintained as natural open space, consistent with Section 7.08C of the Folsom City Charter.

Analvsis: The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) provides one of the largest natural open space areas in the Sacramento Region with over 1,067- acres of open spaoe, which equates to approximately 30.3% of the overall Plan Area. The FPASP open spaoe plan exemplifies the SACOG Smart Growth Principals not only in protecting and preserving natural resources in the Plan Area, but also ensuring that these resources can be used to provide outdoor recreational and educational opportunities for Plan Area residents.

The FPASP open space plan preserves wetlands, Alder Creek and its tributaries, oak woodlands, and culturalfeatures for the use and benefit of all Folsom residents. The FPASP includes two distinct open space zoning categories within the open space land use designation. The first zone, Preserve Open Space (SP-OS1), is more restrictive of the two and is intended to preserve and protect wetlands, vernal pools, ponds, and creeks. The second zone, Passive Open Space (SP-OS2), is less restrictive than the first and is intended to provide passive recreational uses including walking, hiking, and bicycling on designated paved and unpaved trails.

City of Folsom Page 28

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
The overall Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project was allocated

83.9 acres of Measure W open space by the FPASP; the approved project resulted in a2.2-acre increase (83.9-acres to 86.1-acres) in Measure W open space. The proposed Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project does not result in any changes to the Measure W open space referenced above.

SP OBJECTIVE 7.1 (Circulafionl
Consistent with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 and the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375), create a safe and efficient circulation system for all modes of travel.

SP POLICY 7.1
The roadway network in the Plan Area shall be organized in a grid-like pattern of streets and blocks, except where topography and naturalfeatures make it infeasible, for the majori$ of the Plan Area in order to create neighborhoods that encourage walking, biking, public transit, and other alternative modes of transportation.

Analysis: Consistent with the requirements of the Califomia Complete Streets Act, the FPASP identified and planned for hierarchy of connect "complete streets'to ensure that pedestrian, bike, bus, and automobile modes are travel are designed to have direct and continuous connections throughout the Plan Area. Every option, from regional connector roadways to arterial and local streets, has been carefully planned and designed. Recent California legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (AB 32 and SB 375) has resulted in an increased market demand for public transit and housing located closer to service needs and employment centers. ln response to these changes, the FPASP includes a regionaltransit corridorthatwillprovide public transportation links between the major commercial, public, and multi-family residential land uses in the Plan Area.

As shown in the various exhibits attached to this staff report, the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project has been designed with muhiple modes of transportation options consistent with the approved FPASP circulation plan.

SP OBJECTIVE {0.5 (Oak Woodlands and lsolated Oak Trces} Preserve oak woodlands and isolated oak trees in residential and non-residential development parcels wherever practical.

Ci$ of Folsom Page 29

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
sP POLTCY 10.15
Oak trees included in residential and non-residential development paroels are encouraged to be preserved wherever practacal, provided preservation does not:
. Cause a reduction in the number of lots or a significant reduction in the size of residential lots
Require mass grading that eliminates level pads or requires specialized foundations
Require the use of retaining walls or extended earthen slopes greater than 4-feet in height
Require the preservation of any tree certified by an arborist to be dead or in poor or hazardous or non-correctable condition or trees that pose a safety risk to the public
Cost more to preserve the tree than to mitigate for its loss Analvsis: As shown on the submitted Tree Preservation/Removal Plan (Attachment 13 and in Attachment 20), a concerted effort was made by the applicant to protect and preserve as many oak trees as possible. Specifically, the applicant is proposing to preserve 5 individual Oak trees on the project site including a notable 3S-inch diameter Oak tree which will be prominently featured at the driveway entrance off of Mangini Parkway. As described earlier within this report, the topography of the project site is quite varied with slopes varying between 0 percent and 15 percent and elevations ranging from 326 feet to 399 feet above sea level. As a result, a significant amount of grading is required within the development areas with cuts of up to 51 feet and fills up to 34 feet, making it difficult to preserve additional oak trees throughout many portions of the project site. Based on this information, staff has determined that the applicant has made every effort to preserve oak trees on the project site wherever practical as recommended by this poliry. ln addition, the applicant is required to mitigate for project-related impacts to oak woodland preserye, isolated oak tree canopy, and isolated oak trees per the requirements of the FPASP.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS was previously adopted by the City Council on March 10, 2020 for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA). The applicant prepared an environmentalmemorandum (Attachment 17)lor the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project that demonstrates that no new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the proposed project. As a a
City of Folsom Page 30

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December'1,2021
result, no new environmental document is required, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section I 51 62(b).

RECOMMENDATION'PLANN ING COMMISSION ACTION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Administrative Modification for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project to the City Council as illustrated on Attachments 6-16, subject to the findings and conditions of approval attached to this report.

Move to recommend approval of a Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Administrative Modification for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project to the City Council as illustrated on Attachments 6-16, subject to the findings (Findings A-O) and conditions of approval (Conditions 1-71) attached to this report.

GENERAL FINDINGS

NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND CITY CODE.

THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WTH THE GENERAL PLAN, THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC P[AN, AND THE FOLSOM RANCH CENTRAL
DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES.

CEGLA FINDINGS

THE CITY, AS LEAD AGENCY, PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED AN

ENVI RONMENTAL IM PACT REPORT/ENVI RONM ENTAL I MPACT
STATEMENT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

AN ADDENDUM TO THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL

E NVI RON MENTAL I M PACT REPORTIE NVI RON M ENTAL I MPACT STATEMENT WAS CERTIFIED BY THE CITY ON MARCH 10, 2O2O FOR THE

TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT IN
ACCORDANCE W]TH CEQA.

E. THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT NONE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 OR CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 GENERALLY REQUIRING THE PREPARATION OF A SUBSEQUENT EIR EXIST IN THIS CASE.

A.

B.
c
D
City of Folsom Page 31

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021

F THE CITY HAS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOLSOM PI.AN AREA

SPECIFIC PLAN AND HAS DETERMINED THAT NONE OF THE CHANGES

OR REVISIONS PROPOSED BY THE PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN

SIGNIFICANT NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACTS AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY MITIGATION MEASURES IN

ADDITION TO THOSE IN THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

AND THE ADDENDUM FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH
SUBDIVISION PROJECT.

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT THE IMPACTS OF THE TOLL
BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT ARE

ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE

ADDENDUM FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT.

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS

THE PROPOSED SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP IS

CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE

SUBDIVISION MAP ACT IN THAT THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT WLL ENSURE THAT THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WTH CITY STANDARDS.

THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION, TOGETHER WITH THE PROVISIONS FOR

ITS DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENEML

PLAN, THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PIAN, AND ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE.

THE SITE IS PHYSICALLY SUITABLE FOR THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED.

THE SITE IS PHYSICALLY SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

AS CONDITIONED, THE DESIGN OF THE SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT

LIKELY TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR

SUBSTANTIALLY AND AVOIDABLY INJURY FISH OR WLDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT.

THE DESIGN OF THE SMALL.LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVIS]ON MAP

AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT LIKELY TO CAUSE
SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFEW PROBLEMS.

G
H
t.

J.

K.

L.

M
City of Folsom Page 32

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (PN 20-267) December 1,2021
N
o
THE DESIGN OF THE SMALL.LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

AND THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH

EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS THROUGH OR USE OF PROPERW WTHIN THE

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION,
SUBJECT TO SECTION 66474.4 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE LAND

IS NOT SUBJECT TO A CONTRACT ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE CALTFORNTA LAND CONSERVATTON ACT OF 1965 (COMMENCTNG W|TH sEcTloN 51200 oF THE GOVERNMENT CODE).

City of Folsom Page 33

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 3
Minutes from December I ,202I
Planning Commission Meeting

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

W
l.' ( r,l ,,'r (11 'ri1

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
December I,2021

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
6:30 P.M.
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
CALL TO ORDER PLANNING COMMISSION:

Daniel West, Bill Miklos, Chair Justin Raithel
Ralph Peffa, Barbara Leary, Vice Chair Eileen Reynolds, ABSENT: None
CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None
MINUTES: The minutes of the November 17, 2021 meeting were approved as submitted Nomination of a Planninq Commissioner to the Historic District Commission

COMMISSIONER REYNOLDS MOVED TO RECOMMENO JUSTIN RAITHEL TO SERVE ON THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION.

COMMISSIONER MIKLOS SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH CARRIED THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES:PENA, LEARY, REYNOLDS. WEST, MIKLOS, RAITHEL
NOES: NONE
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

PRESENTATIONS

1. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Qualltv Manaqement Dlstrict Presentation on Air Qualitv and Land Use {Paul Philley, Program Supervisor-CEQA & Land Use)

PUBLIC HEARING

2. PN 20-267. Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivislon Small-Lot Vestinq Tentative Subdlvlslon Map and Mlnor Admlnistratlve Moditication
A Public Hearing to consider a request from Toll Brothers, lnc. for approval of a Small-Lot Vesling Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Administrative Modification for development of a 329-unit single-family residential subdivision on a 64.7-acre site located at the northwest corner of the intersection of East Bidwell Street and White Rock Road within the Folsom Plan Area (APN: 072-0060-103), The General Plan land use designations Irlnrrning Conrrrrissiort i\l inulcs
l)cccrnber l. 202 I
llirgc I uf 2
3

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
for the project site are SFHD, MLD, and OS (Open Space), while the Specific Plan land use deslgnations ara SP.SFHD-PD, SP-MLD-PD, and SP-OS. An Addendum lo the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS has previously been approved for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project in accordance with the California Environmenlal Quality Act (CEaA). This Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivlsion Map does not result in substantial changes to the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project, and no additional environmental review is required, (ProJect Planner: Steve Banks/Applicant: Toll Brothers, lnc.) COMMISSIONER RAITHEL MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SMALL.LOT VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS ILLUSTRATED ON ATTACHMENTS 6-'16, SUBJECT TO THE F|ND|NGS (FtND|NGS A-O) AND CONDTTTONS OF APPROVAL (coNDrTroNS 1-71) ATTACHED TO THtS REPORT.

COMMISSIONER REYNOLDS SECONDED THE MOTION
COMMISSIONER LEARY MADE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO CONDITION NO. 51 TO ADD "Russell Ranch Phase 2 Masler Plans shall not include turf except for model homes."

COMMISSIONER RAITHEL ACCEPTED THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT WHICH CARRIED THE FOLLOWNG VOTE;
AYES:LEARY, RAITHEL
NOES: PENA, REYNOLDS, WEST, MIKLOS
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT FAILED.

THE COMMISSION VOTED ON COMMISSIONER RAITHEL'S ORIGINAL MOTION WHICH CARRIED THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: PENA, REYNOLDS, WEST, MIKLOS, RAITHEL
NOES: LEARY
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

PLANNING COMMISSION
'

PLANNING MANAGER REPORT
The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for December 15,2021

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
AD N
APPROVED:

Justin itaith6t, CnAn
Pllnrring ('onrrnissiurr M irrutcs
l)cccrnltr l. 2021
I'agc 2 ol'2
4

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachmerrt 4
Vicinity Map

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Vicinity Map
Lin
F'OLSO}JI
io&ltrlrrtPA
tl d, I.a,
Radlrr.rtr-tlrIf lrlG;|
cehtbrahdftFb
Aed lr :t. l0! 1
irrb.lrgrlf€tnbratrxtuqrl 2otl
E &Ud/Elalrdb{ifrcltirr Trnt'
AED.C .lr! 2!. trlil
Atl * Iagcc I t Ztl or la
5EIllPA
^For- SO.rt 2z.Zoli
4Gl&Ydna.ld !Fa.tnltiL?lat'rrd Edr Za 2Oi6
lCla/blfrrqfnlt^
^aF- nrt ?. 201 6
20lt o lE
Crrftn-L-r*lFsr- e al, 1!!c
ta!tbrtlrlraltA
AFqd 5 2t.20ra
tt4
t€d
fc ,*
. ..m il<
rlHlt@
IIo
I
--. c
I.
r ll'll5l DU
. ?,005 Pogulrton
r 0.8 dulac Avenge Denrlty
. 2.hr GSF Gonmorclal
Itro-tl
NX
.',]::

IJ"',,
--za.*on$-'>
..:;;::{J''
!
\o,l
,1
a\
Project Site
*eollF,Eott
Affitbrnlrtriltollt a. L!hrrrtrt-btilnbagq- gt r I lor t tl dr l.d
bl{.$!lcE ifaA!,cdlJtlt 2tl,.Otn,ll-l..,liloIcJ
L!frlHFb!ltranrftfdr6turrttJ.20ttt.!&lr.FF,F'tertl|*d h'l trbl.t! ra tE!!tTlFod lf,t'r rl 20tlgo.b lfrrdlrr9il
. ':r----.-
.!--i
r.te::-rl
.ffitlclf lt^' : tr-
. J ,---i.,i'-'- t
'ir-..-.<F'
;"---

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 5
Illustrative Master Plan Exhibit
Dated August 31,2024

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
tt
a
ItcExcY Ar Folsor lAicil?h^s; r
(lcttye Ad.t Corffifirfftt
'144UDryir
a- l ''ts^
.EJAEE&B
a
.a 1r
-
ttcExcv AI FotJoH tANcH
?xr56 2
{fuhr. A€iv. Adv, Commuolty)
lllurlrollve Msrler Plon ExHHt
Tall Drofhers
.'rr.s" !,,-r aIt
TtaDflrota/lr
HOTESTC3
r;lla ff '
1rt t aa
lttilIYrut

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 6
Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
Dated September I 7, 2021

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
{
VTCINITY MAP BilCHMARK
IENIAIVF MAP NQiE5
lf>
i:ii
i
\
.6! sq!*
*
Jr.{
1i\.5
'. f'1,'/!./
*sxE r€K RAO ?RcPEt.B rr
cr2 -acaa-c70
16r lafiG-f re morru rffi?M sn
q rt:lc il.'!* RuJ,l
.1 .. . ,-,,'\ Jl , ., :

ItNl^lv€ MAP rNFotMAtOr
| ffil*;iltl I
"+1_.Ff+
,t
!,Aai( , i:.4 !4.:r1,{a:. :-.
=:-:-:----' +
A
i+-rLv LOTTING PLAN

VESNNG TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
PHASE 2
o@dt4t@b&@b
macxAr&s0mPs *=18
I

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

AttachmentT
Preliminry Grading and Drainage Plan
Dated September 17 ,2021

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
tr=-'{-
*'1
:).t'T-
-a$F
,'RLof wffi
tcs:f iaL !5tAia sau-r. ac
(!+ v
\!_
<P
- -t_
\_
(F
o-_,qe
1 =..'!ff"*- -+! '.:-:--::::
.wvF6. G
* Lra ae^ lc^o P(oPaRltc!, -ia
-?r

PRELIMNARY GRADING PLAN

VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
*
TOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
PHASE 2
Eii8;::g
i
i 'rg [email protected] rw&owa, 1w^ltut Nt
:{,
(!#
.rdi&bFFD
re

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 8
Preliminary Utility Plan
Dated September 1 7, 2021

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

I tcL- Saofh&s Ar FOSW grcn; ta?Tiavia YaMAT.v: &?:
:{,
'i:

I
\\
'-\l,t tt:!
g
rosoi Rat E:A-! 59!r|. [c
-'-1'-
\tltni6
tdc< dosa va^lrRlg. k
wrtr€ iaci FqD FRortfrls &o?2-oo@-c70

PRELIMINARY UNLIW PLAN

VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
,F
TOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
PHASE 2.FrnsbEEe
re
9""""-U_i

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 9
Preliminary Landscape Plan and Details
Dated January 24,2020

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

PERSPECTIVE
ct'{,'Miloutx,tcAt PHoR
A^CKOROUTf,' TIilIE TEE
OLEA EI'ROP,FA I P'l'I,,s EDIJI,E

PAR(WAYTHSE
PIT7OSPORTJM
REGENCY PARI(WAY SCHEMATIC PLANNNG PLqN
"OAK WOODLAND" THEME
Th6 s@ndhg eJ.pcive Cdbfi*i Oat t tooderd pEvides
@ ot Fokmfi b€d ffi Ow vlsbn bb bring 4 nuctt
of lhb 3plit G pq$Dla inb lh3 f&ffit oa Regmct ro
gu,Ee a stlltbfb EHod&uih ile' rEtrrd lsttage. IhtE
irdudes mt mly tr€6dhg, bd ad&[ Spedm O* in ksy
l€tor thEr.gtu{ fie poiect, and suForltE wih oths
uEod{d type Ep€dc ln addnim, re ull uilire tsgiqd plant raterial h e brfld ed o{giliad pen b dLcf fhe Tol
dgnA{€ delign.

TREE PALETTE
PffiARVTI{EIE TREEIS

SPECIMEN OAIG
ot,ERct s vnGNhl.lA- sorrTHERr{ uvE oAr(
CXNt,lAIrlOMtni CAtrlPt{OR& CA'l*loR tneE
OI-EA EUR@AEA- OLNE
PINUS EIX'US - Pf{('N P|NE
F'{IARYAACEilT TREES
SCfIINT.|S UCII.E . CAIJFORI{IA PEPPER TREE
ACER PAI.['ATUI' . JAPANES€ ITAPLE
CERCIS OCCID€NTruS - WESIERN REDBUD

SHRUB PALETTE
PdIANYNIETE GflA8SEE
coL€of\,€M
l€sPEE{.OE
FFrO$IID

TEIICRI'JM
BOI'TELO{JA. GRAMA
FESTIJCJ. FESCUE
HESPERAI-o€.}1J@A
MISCANTHIJS MISCANIHI,6
MUHLENBERGIA IIi,|HLY
F€SIIICA
U/ES'R[\'G'A
PEf,ARY THEilE SHRUAA
OALEA" PRARIE CLO/ER
EREUOPTIII.A. BLUE BELLS
IANTAilA
IEUCOP}fYLLUfI}' SAGE
NTTOSPORUM T. WHEELEft'- DWARF PfiTGPORIjTI

PEROVSKIA SAGE
FHU{i. Stltt AC
ROSEilARINiJ$ ROSE['AR!'
SALVIA. SAG€
TEUCRIUi'. GERI'ANTIER

WESTRINGIA COASTAL ROSEUARY
TollBrothels
E.swF-alq- 'REcEr{cy pAR(wAr scgErlAnc rnrmncdfll$

PERSPECTIVE
@rgngpt
ffiG ffiru

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
f
I

LOCAL ROAD I
SCALE: ?ri-t'-t
s@vAJ(

REGENCY PARKWAY CROSS SECTION
SCALE: 96'=lrtr
TollBrothers
aa

LOCAROAO II
SCALE: 9{6'=tL0'
LEGEND
-

LOCAL ROAD I SECTTON
-
LOCAL ROAD ItSECT|ON
-

REGENCY PARKWAY SECTION
tOCAt ROAD
BaS
s8ciloNsEr
t
@rgngvt TOIL BROTHERS AT FOTSOM RANC-FII?ET

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

PLANT PALETTE:

SIREETTREES
-rqtsFt,@E
Mm-urs@ ffit'r.qrGfiH^ m$qryEE
rcCENTTREES
54&ErcE
FIilE
rarrt€
ACCEMre
O.G SDE YARS fM I O \CRNCALSCREEN
@t@E
JruAffi
g3*r&

SACI(GROUND SHRUBS
F@U6mD
re
*@F6|IEt
re
re
3anN6
@uerratm}FORMPM
OEC@TIEWM EN4C€D PArc PAUNG
as N D.€
50x95
n&iT€CMt.y
@rcffisreP
SUNGO
m
rilSA $UFER
JAEr.&ln
gn5
€
re G?.€
.@n Caqs**
o il|DGROUNDSHR(FS
*Fgs66
o
[email protected]
MREGROTJT$ GRASS€S
ffiru* 5Erut gd
ffirE[r
ffffirl.&@u
69ffi li8l&F. tcrewF. msll@* S{mcmffirBW q@
€6 uu03u
R.,RF
IMIGANONNOTES:
sffi^dMencFqril@ruEffi^.,.!%rc!qo4tsffiEe
I'OlE
sY&MFd3.*
55X95 65X95
FbrFfOIIIO
i :i i'-, t:
',S:r.dr:.*:r
E
4\
EIqt.

I
FOLSOM
fRONT YARD%IIBrctiers

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
ffi
PLANT PALETTE:

STREEITREES
ACCENT1REES
5@MFME

UIDGROUIO SHRUBS
[email protected]
@AlJdE'

BACKGROJND SHRTJES
s@uo@D
ml&
@E
re
d{&ffi E@ Irtuffi lB.ffi'lll6 taE
ffim @4sg
re
*
aG.gory@ & IRON
mPrT/
PffreS
dSEre
glEGEr
9Mffi SNU6URE
rcSDryrc
ESdS@ENCE
mooRwt
CffiETSE
ftE HEreE
sffico PAureFAno

TOWNHOMES
Ft#o1049a
I€FNCA! SCREEN
@
usmwmr6€E@
NIreA
ER€ME OruP
FONTANS fl OECOMM ESE

SECIMEN TES
rcoo!@sE o€cK
€
@
0 re
.iffiAAl@
FOREGRqJNO GRASSES
SEjg@F
'
@E.6
ffi@ffi
ffioff
v7* rURF
60x70' RRIGATICI'I NOTES:
rddfr^umEEffi@n!qa
}OTE:
sBglstFa@u44t
-.i , :i-'-- -l---'ii'
,1 : :-:i:--: I i
,l t,
lE
ToIlBrotherc

FRONT YAID
116FOLSOM AT

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 10
Preliminary Entry Exhibit
Dated April 28,2A21

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
st-oc( wAtt lilPl3.r RETAINING WALT

EX, GROUND

TREE AT PRIMARY ENTRY
369.2
R[3tO[|mA[t!!torMlAL

LOI LOT
368. 32s
372.7
326
372.3
327
371.7
('I
N
o
I
328
372.0
tEt.w^ua
s
A IR€E #62
@
372.2
260
371.5
FG=370.23
-t
I
259
372.1
*510.4
(r.{XO
\e
\ tvr
\.=.1
3 70.1
x
4 3,70'0
369'1
x e
369'
"L
'B'
258
372.7
269
270
371.5
371.1
0 PHASE 2 PRIMARY ENTRY CONCEPT

TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH
w
796,t.RSP
0 25 50 100
--E:::::::==-l
SCALE: 1'-50'

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment l l
Preliminary Wall and Fence Exhibit
Dated April 28,2A21

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

LEGEND
d-brn
l-tta
tlt:r

CONCREIE BLOCK WALL
4 N|GF fffacwA4 A0i9
PERIMETER THEME WAILdxeiBlqqt{GH
^!qcwrecrbeVIEW FENCE
4 38 AIUR mL NO 40C(wdcMurctffE
rcIE: rct *& a0 rc 645 t$l lEEt 1O tiE ICU
,ioreE AT E5* h+ aLsE W4mNg@(6
,/'. /
0 Rood

WALL AND FENCE CONCEPT
TOLT BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH-1-0 100 200 400
-:
*q
I
0 SCALE: 1 "=200
As{ 28.2021
7964-RSP

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 12
Preliminary Tree Preservation/Removal Exhibito dated
October l3,202l

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
!
-- --)
a.-
I
$
L
@Et4*AYffiaUXq'r€r
+
-_
o
@
o
IOAEEVO@DUErcMN/ffiUMreOFre
IO reREUOWDWTOI.XATW,
cn>!. w>t
FE&AIUW TO PRESRVE rc reDfiERWWGW|NCPwS

OAKWDUM
%fi u u n or w woLoAD t upAcT
Tree hesewation / Removal hhibit
Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch
Phase 2
?f_i#"" BsrrygqEE #fx,
Whlte io"i eo"o
to

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 13
Minor Administrative Modification Exhibit
Dated July, 2020

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
ll lr
I
t:

I
t
I
-
!
I
I I
t
il,
il
I
i, '\l
I
I,
ri:l
t
It
'!$!
'IIi
I
t 'l
'. i-
Irl
I
r1
li
ii
i,t
I
t.'
.t
I
I
!
f
t
I
I
rQ
I
I
I
I
IIt
,t II
d
.tttra tI
J t
I ,
iI :

I
t
a
t
t
g
is
lr
I
I
I
I
, rl
a
\i\i
I
(
I
q
I'
I'
I
I
II
tlit
'.t
I
,i
l'\
I
li
,t
r
j
J
I
t,
Elt!'lfi
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
a
i
t
n
I
t )
t
a
I
t
I 'r
!t
ii''Fr
,!
I
I
.1.,.
tt L.
n
l
a
I
t_
I

9..
'.,|
I
illi
'lfi
:

I
e
{F
6 I
I
1 r r|D'Gt
f#t
dr!
ri
sfl.

Ee
l*
at
=l
ilgil 3 o
il-6-
l=FlJ>-
l3 =: l:oP-l'E o

18. g
$l 3ell.!ii-
iF
,llip
il
F
It
g
a
,
l
(
h
Ht:

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 14
Inclusionary Housing Letter
Dated November I 6,202A

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

TollBrothers

AMERICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER'
November 16,2020
Mr, Scott Johnson
Planning Manager
Community Development Department
City of Folsom
50 Natoma Strcet
Folsom, CA 95630
Re: Toll Brotherc at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 - Small Lot Tentative Map Compliance with Chapter 17.104 - Inclusionary Housing
Dear Mr. Johnson,
In accotdance with Chapter 17,104 of the Folsom Municipal Code, Toll West Inc. which will do business in California as Toll Brothors West Inc., hereby elects to satis$ the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requircments fol the ptoposed Small l,ot Tentative Map with the payment of the In-Lieu Fee as permitted in Section 17, 104,050(c).

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
ffi
,/
an Dam
Vioe President
Sncrnmento Dlvlslon
23J0 E. Bldlell Stlcct, Suite 201, Fokom, CA 95630
Officer (916) 358-3?01
tollbrothcrs.com

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Affachment 15
Project Narrative
Dated September I 6,2A2I

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

TIIIBroffters

AM ERICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER'
FOLSOM
R.A.N.C.H
I

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

OV E RY IEW : Enlillernen t
We ore pleoled io submil the Plsnning Entillemenl Applicotion for the TOLL BROTHERS Ar fol.so,l TANCH PHASE 2 prcjeci o port of the Folsom Plon A@ Specif,c Plon {FPASP}.

Submitted herein i5 the PROJ€CI ilAIIAIIVF for the lO[L BtOfiEfS At rcfSOm ilNCH IHAtE 2 proiect.Ihis docurenl conloins lhe p.oiect norolive ond exhilits lhol describe the requ$ted Proj*t entitlemenls.

The equsred Lond Use Entitlefrenls s@ght oe for o Srnll lol Vesllng letl'olive Subdiyision Mop cotrist€ni with the FPASP {Morch 20181 ond IOLL EROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH antitl€ments {Morch 2020).

A cfresponding ,ltlnor Admhlslrcflye Anendmed lor lhg lEnsl€f ol Deydopmst lhhtr (dwelling units] is oko soughl wilh fhis opplicofim. lhe reguerled Pbnnirg Entitl€'nenb include lte rbnowiflg:

I - Smoll Lot Vesling Tenlotive Subdivisian Mop
2, Mno.Adminiskolive Modificotis - Ircrofer of Development Righls- lem rDmt €d wlri lhit applcdlon lnctsde:
l. Applicotion Fom

2. Developrenl Pemil Fees

3. Project Norqtive (contoined herein)
4- Smoll Lot Vesting Tentotive Subdivision Mop {inclvoes loiiing plon, prenminory groding/droinoge plon, preliminory utility plonl

5. lllustrstive Mop

6. MAM - Trorofer of Developmenl REhls Erhibit fcontoined he/ein] 7, lnclusionory Hosing Plon
to be ssbmlned ,tr srAsquent &!rl',roF:

8. Rodius Mop, Lisl, Ewelopes
sflwffit6.pt
PROJECTNARRAAVE r
iotol lee
5 16,945
$ 6,osl
number ol
reCdenilol
loh
r29

DEFOSII
iee per
lot
reCdenllol
$32
boe
iee
$ 6.417
$ 6.051
llrem
t.

Enllllem€nl
SLVTSI Tenfotive
Subdivision Mop Review
ENY{nmd Study {deposit}
IOtl, SiOIHERS AI FOltOil RANqH PHASE 2 Enllerncnb
522.? 9 6
FOLSOMr IOLI BROTHERS.AT FOLSOM RANCH i PHASETISI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
( 'r.. a
't I. 8AC(ROUND ANO ENIIII.EMFNT HISIORY
trt,.
lhe FPASP 2O2l Ownsship itilop is stown hde-
Ine Prolecl Sile rubiecl properly is icientified by APNS 072-m60-07t, .099 qnd -lcl, Tne proiecl owns ond
oppliconi ore TOLL VVEST iNC. which will do busnes in
Colilornio os TOLL BROTHERS weST rNC-
TollBroffiers
lhc FP SP Ragionot Cqrte$ llops ore thom hda.
fhe@w6opptoved
by ihe Cify of Foisom on Jure 28, 201 I (Resolul;on No.8863). The Plon ercompos€s 3,513.4 undeveloped ocfes locored south cf Hiqhwoy 50. norlh ol white Rock Rood. eost of Pcirie Cily Rood ond bordering the Socrome.to Counly/El Dorodo Ccunty Lire, os shown below.
t
n
'tuItr&h
.:Fotrmq;
. !1 \\
't
il
*
\
I
I
i
I
{
l
I
I
I
i
I
!
i
,'
i
i
I
!
SPIEMBER r6. S2t

PROJECTNARRATIVE
-
F}
b9.nd
tufrsp I**
Orn.r a-dt.'.91
- el&!6u
l"-*,*-*-,,'-*.'t..r a-ututs* qee€iF,c.tr,r'.!L
l- -- ilsb"*. *i.1-F,. [( -- [^({LhvIs !.
_
-__ 6/r* trN F.i- L ,
@g:c i ". rry",o,.*.L..vr,"qo*^,
.. td!,bil!J!rtd,-..
?4Fw, eRova4,{o,u-
. *B4rert lia
lEn'"-lffi ss-,.s*."u
Sru-
rF*
tlbbj:eh.hui
l**,.**.".",^,^
rle L.., he*---.*EN
bnJcvb6rdtu r
ff 4.". rra*-ur*e ht r.b*i
i- lryk'*rwx €lw'wsc:
$['nu.o*
|HUb[C
sifilc
t::
l
I
I
L- a-,/_,
:

E
g
c
ltl./\l
'\l
"+'
1 #ww"
Folsom Plan Area Specifrc Plan
Ownership Exhibit
PROJECT APNs 3h4rrd2WrqA2l
MAGKAY&sOMPS
€ rpng' TCII BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH i PHASE 2 IiE'

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

2. CURRENIFOI.SOA,I PI.AN AREA SPEC'F'C PI.AN I.AND USE Ana
Plsn
Ihe folm Plqr Areo Specifc Prqr wos
updoted in 2018 to incrude oll ol tt€
vorious opproved Pl9n omencments
ond mopping modif'cotions to lhe Picn
Areo to dote.
lhe Foltom Plan Areq Speciliq Prqn
ml I -mzl fnrilt'emerrs exhrbit lr rhowt
hd". This exhib't illustrcles lhe cJrenl
enlitlemenl hisiqy ond lond plonning
5toivr for lhe FPA5P PlOn AreO.
---sll.llr-
n'trlf I Dr6
rpilua;) -_
_._,sr1.M_
-l!g!:ai,L-l2ll
ss )0 $r
,tu1&
ra,5.E:

I
---t_@
---;'
5 t_lIl
,__l
-B
r. I cerd
^orr i:_lYrre,r'
. _,J . 11,461 DU
. 27 ,233 Population
r 6.7 du/ac Average Density
. 2.8m GSF Commercial
1 E
-s'
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
20tI / 2|]:,Pntitlements
TolIBroffters PROJECT NARRATIVE
: FOLSOM TOLL BRCITHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH I PHASE 2

SPIEMBEI IA MI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Tha Fobom Plan Ateo 2020 6q chanl exbibit fu shown here This exh;oil provides q groph'E oepiction ot lhe Pton Areo s "holding ccpociiies'relctive to rAidentiol dwelinq uniis. populclioi ond comrerciol buald'ng oreo (gross squo(e feell No clEags lo lhe oydail lotal F?ASP uni, dlbcanon q cqmercio, gD$ rguqe Fel vll occut ftom llr* ertit emedr.

FPASP Dwelling Units, Population and Commercial Building Area I Commercralokfg Area I O\rellrnE Unds PopularEn
6l -o6' o
z00c
oilo 0o0
O
zo
dt
9r
ooz
6Fs:o
o0z
oFo€
I
a
E
oq
oz
?
q
z
?
cz
I
U
2 I
oz
Ioz
o
s
cg<Oo;
2z
o 000r?
L
g
a,
oo
I
.g
2dl
E
o
EE
o()
oo
ri q
1 u
z

10.000
I 0000@
coo
000
oco
3 oco
: !:,-
I 000
uoz
o
.E
:to
o3o
6 000
r 000
? 0i0
.5
May 26,2020
sEnEffiER t6.2@l
TollBrothers PROJECTNAnRAflVE
-
$so€
-9{t6
o
o'
be
"?69..cqEsf a6tsodt
a
=I
E
5 IFo
6 6
3 o
q
o
I
d
E?
L
,;
a
.q
o,
i porsou TOLI BROTHERS AT FOTSOM RANCH I PHASE 2 IGI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

PROJECTS,'E
tocAltc,N:
the horec, Slrr rr s,rown
hsc. Eost Bidwell Sireet.

Mongini Porh{oy. ond
Ook Avenue ptovide
occs to ihe Prcject.

Adjocent to the Pbj6l. is
Mdngini Ronch Ph@ l,
Mongini Ronch Phqre 2,
Creelstone, oll ol whbh
ore curentv undg
conslruction.

TOLT BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RA,NCH i PHASE 2
truR16.@1ToIl
FOLSOMt.

PROJECI NAIRANVE

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

3. CURRENIPROJECIARfA
ENIIII.EMENTSIAruS
Shdn ise & ,hc opproved tOlJ 8ROfHfis
Af FOi-sOlt RANCH fitudrotive Mop.

The lOU. BROTHERS Al folsoru tANCtl
Project Site is o propo*d Aclive-Adult ond
Trodilionol singleiomily ottocned ond
detoched residentiol subdiisjon bound by
Mongini Porkwoy, Eost Bidwell Srreet, White
Rock Rood ond Ook Avenue Porkwoy in lhe
souttrcenkol porlion ol the Folsom Plo.

Areo Specific Plon,
l*trtly qpproved bV the Cily ol Fobffi.
orc ,fis toll 8f,OlHffs AT FCrlSOiU t^l{Crl
Spr/tc Plor Am.ndm enl, G6qol Plan
Amendmenl, qDd Pbtrred Dcveriopmen
P"(nlt tbr the IEGINC( btd^d ol Actlvc
Adst commvnry orchtctwc (PhoF I ond
2r. Aclive Aouli homes were plonned in two
phoses (Phose I ond 2 of lhe IOLL
BROTHERS Prcject), Phce 3 b prcposed lor
lrodiliono, homeiirs. while relicientiol
orchiiecture wo5 opproved lor tne
REGENCY Ac1've Adult PhGas ol ihe
P@ject, poject orchileclure for the Phqse 3
Trodifionol Homesites wos nol propGed wiih
lh-6 prior opdicotion cnd is nol o port ol lhis
opplicolion.
-the enfitlement5 described ebove included
ond opelied to the ennre -'OLt SROTHERS
lond oreo. vorious lorge lots, coresponding
to lhe Specif:c Plon bounoories were shown
in lhe Phose 2 oreo. however. os lhe Pnose
2lnlemol design wos slill being developed,
lhoi opplicdion did not mop lhe indivlduol
residenliol {ond o$ocioteo} smoll lols. the
suSregt ot lhir qppfcstaoo b rorelt, to mqp
t re Phqe 2 q@ tfiol vor aot hclvded
pEvioqrt No chonges to the prior
opprovols ote requelted.

A collecrion ol opproved nops ond exhibits
is siom on lhe Following poges. lhis
opplicotion is coNistent with 'lhese
ertitlements.

O.tu@&
'::'-T*
r-aa
REGENCY AI FO|.sOM RANCH
PMSE 2
(Ful!r. Actlvc Adull Commu^lty)
llluslronve Moster Plqn Exhibtt

TOLL BROTHERS AT FOTSOM RANCH
ToIIBrothers
llucN(ff&s0nriIRA,OMON.AL
lior EstrEs
,l
s
"=::-=:;*
IEGENCY AI FOIsOTA RAI'ICH
FHAS€ I
(Acltve Adull Comunity)

PROJECT NANRANVE
:? l9!:9M TOLL BROii.{:RS Ar FOISCM RAhrCi-i I PHASE 2
fPrtuSER 16.zmr

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
rRAIS i{Amn PIAN
flF aryovedtp0E t as,q Plor i3 sDom tee lhe TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH overoll plon contoins 3.E mite5 of Cbis I koil5 thot wi[ remoin opcn tq f[blic usoge in perpeluity.

ToIIBrrotfters
GENERA[ PIAN AND SPECIF'C PI. TV IAND USE
Iho opprryed Germ, Plon ond Speitic pba brd 6e
dsigrsttoro are thou iqe. The proposed lOtL EROIHERS
AI FOTSOM RANCH PHASE 2 Smoll Lot Vesting Tentowe
Subdivision MJp is consislent with the tond use des:€nqtbns shown on this exhibit ond ioble.
1/24lmix)

PROPOSED IAND USE PTAN
,fiLffi AcrEs uxrrs

7.9 85. l
TOTAT
(MEASURE W} I

0.0 0.0

BACKBONE
ROADS
I lau_rl,r9lj
os
200.5 r.058
r9.8 167
SFHD
MI,D
TOI"L ERO1HERS AT FOI.SOM RANCH -
GPA,/SPA LAND U5E D,AIA SUMINARY

3.8 mrus oF ttAlt
05 t--
€
ureNt
IANCA
tH& 1
o3

AODGD IRAIL UNDETCROSSING
Of LOCAT ROAD
5r0
o5
rc
Irp

TRAII AUGN'IAENT SHIFIED
WEST DUE IO ENVIRONMENTAI.
coNsltArN15
-ta
so
$HO
ffE
$fl0
6 EXTENDED
lRAlL = 0.3

AI THE REQUEST OF SCHOOT
OISIRICI A,l{D CIIY OF FOLSOrrt
sruo
III
--llll
MNSINI
n
0 ,'t.
s$-.J
lt
-)
!
I
I

PROJECI TIARTATIVE
f romou TOTL BROTHERS AT FOTSCM RANCI.! ; PHASE 2
sPr#16.ur

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
t1l
9213.#dyidhrrb6d
tt,,-n!.-.--
ItMUrF-ry w htnr b6ld 'foffiF
_.!nto.e[trt,!e-r-a, ___
ret*
,q1 il9 flt_3it'_Ti !tFg.in4!d-
OFk0.t*S ltt.rgP.o!
.-t
:\
t
NEGENCY PHASE 2
'r-?;', -. ..:--3
IJ':ri""-:tre\ -
- ---:.\ - :.
;.8''*--l-" i ,i-:
ts:+ r _i-?..^:
i 1:i:"4:-_ :_ '- .__::i'_: -.:_1::': -. ,..-_..ffi
L_-_:*-
'_:.'
arr^ er w, stFtsr
i
-.+
?deaa -.!r:-..
-i.^-:*--
'e:- : -r-r ia-- : . ,;_.:
.+
ll. .* r 'a.-Lr
*-ii-.---t .l'
.'i@
+: -:lr-

COVER SHEET

VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
+-- r -.v 1.. . -.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch.ru*ra'm.
@K{YluE :.:

APPROVED SMAULOT

YESTING IEMANVE
suED,v,stoN A,|AP
the oppoYed Smoll Lol
Vsting Tentoiive Subdiv'6is
Mop cr6led 8&1 lotol
residenriol lots: 590 octive
odull rsiJentid lots in Phose I
on lhe eosi sioe of'he Proj€€|,
ond 214 trqdillonol residenliol
lols on lhe west side of the
Prcject qeo- (Ph€ 2 ws
included in lh'6 mop ond
seve.Ol lorg€ lots were crstgd
on this mqp within Phose 2,
however. lni5 mop did noi
include ihe res'dentiot loB-
Ihe prcpo5eo Smoll Lot Vesting
Tentorive Mop Covet Sheel
snd lond ue summory loble
ote shom hse.

Toll
/F
F

PNOJECI NARRANVE
59!99M TOI,L BROTHERS AT FOi..SOM RANCH i PH,ASE 2
sflgffi 16.t2t

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
ts
PIANNED oEyEl.OPilEl{r (PO) PEnMtr - REGE {CY DEVEI,OP {Eilf StAilDAnDS ond RES'DEilNAI AiCHNECr|./NE
Sto;n t€rE ffi tlp Sprmd IFG€flCf Ddsbp',,.nt giafibrdt ordeJiredbl clilF we ToloEd octivHdut developrent slondsds w@ nece$ory lo albulote the desbn ond lifesMe inlenl fd the communily or)d meet the physicol ond findnciol ne€ds ot the octivmdr, horEbuyeE REGENCY res'denliol horcsites ore povided in PhoFs I ond 2 of the TOIL EROIHERS Proj*f- Four tt\y'es of orchil*lu€ were oppwed for the REGENCY Phoses ol the IOLI BROTHERSAT FOISOM RANCH. Eoch sMe contoins lrodiimd clmcte&tics of lhe closic 5Ve. but with o rnodem conlempordy €xeclrlis. llodedr foamhouse
&dlcn-l0b
Soqnlrh Cobnid
llodem Crofismon
(65ros'b6l
sttD
SFID
4,md rin.
45(bl-Mh
55B'1r
stBm
,lO dil-
45 nir
35 tr*L
10 dic
tz5 frd
l5 Fi^
2g rd[
15 nnl
5 ditr
I5 n*t.
20'rin.
t nnq
5'dla
lO mia
5'dlil
5 ditr
s*
35lE
16lE
l8lE
l.ttE
(55tO5'lolrl
SFHD
stflD
4-ftf-Min

4.qlf ilitr
551'E
501]rq
f ril.
45' d1,
39 {ir
6'd-
125 rin
t-s flh.
20 mh,
nlo
5 ni[
l5 F{n-
8 nh.
5 rift
5 rih.
lO dtn.
5 nia
5 oi[
S dn1-
35|Ir
lEl@
18lE
15,B
(5e('5b,b)
SfHD
sfilD
4,@6f rin

4.5ost. Min
558llq
50tlE
a0'Ftu.
45 Fi!
35'dn.
{(I nir
125 rin.
l5 din
8 ri^.
5'tri:.
15 rifu
?oil'n.

S ri[
5 mn,
l0 din.
5'Fh
S rin.
5'tirr
35ltB
l8l@
lEl1u
l5lrr
SFIID
FO('ULoBl
3FI{D
4,md din-
4CEf,Mh
558ffi
Mffi
10 Fin,
49 rin,
35'nin-
,O rin,
125'ritr
I 5 rin,
I E di^.
5'nir
I t rin.

I tiL
5'rrh.
5'ftii,
lO din
5 rin.
$ trlc
Srlt[
35lE
18mf,
18lE
l5l1g
mDfornlloltF
(€}lq,
GeetrnCelol
fltD
3-msf di^
2,ml rir
dotllq
6OXlB
Zt tat
3/ rh
l8 rin.
n/q
I fiin.
5fritu
n/o
5 rir
.' trir
125 r&L
I 5' din,
18 rin,
?ttdy/3s lB
lSmr
nlo
l5l'r
9fiOldn9
l{otHCATEGOIY
lol Sze
htqio. Lot
colG lol
tolulEtlt Cilqogcnlss Lol
cffitol
Lol
Lboclr
Fror* Yard Scbqcfr
wch
llroy ilnEtde
Jqoqe (ftoff €bvotiory'dooF)
lqqgc (rHr.lrvdlsl
lld. Yca solbodt
nlsg ridg rqd
rlreel Cd€ yord lcdF. !ot,
gqogp l*lng ide shet lcqm. lotl
Fqond drallr€ rit
Fcc$qy drKhf.r lF$.,tJ. lot lines,
lE Yord s.ll*b
Grin bsildng
i4qd <rwefing mil
rccGqyslnff€
lelEhedff*
1 5
6 5,9
zs
4,5,E
1,6
t.2
I
l0ldlng tlahfil
Ein bJkn:ng
ietched gqoge
r€6d dwelim unt
mc6dyhl*E
il ecod&e(it?€ uit paced obg€ detetEd gdq€re.l/|!en M,Light i@ed tgn'ddnde & rq Ftbocb tq both del€h.d gqoge ord s@d r{t iffie@d to lg:
fd Eo.|ol.lire dwelllre {tts d.ide }dd€lbcr fq onesjd€;5.mia *fffik tdfie obq to,rrd Oetwer detqchedbdtdrigr Mecuedol€lbch
& .6@d d the brcl of sidewdt if sidewdk ls provlded.

M@dtpgqogedo@
A Fee .$dde Lot townhome ir on ot oclEd dweiling wil ||here t* q6 h6 obdorde legd tttte ,o bofh lond o.d buld'ng- MaD ,trd e; Ps thc FPASP 20lA It rniiim@ fs *es,uy dodnrr, r nifimn lq sinsCe-rt4y p.odE .

Font selb@t tg rhcet r'de{n gqoEe is ,reted tfE m 6 F[imq}.skGr@ ToLL BRoTHERS AT Fotso[1 RANcH: REGENcy AcTIvE.ADULT DEVELopN,,ENT sTANDApDs € T-OHgM TOIL BROTHERS AI FOTSOM RANCH I PHASE 2
Toll SEMrCml
PROJECT I{ARNAIVE
P10

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

GP
strc
f0
sfio
SFrc
gfxD
06 *p
Wl!'f.riry be &n5,ry Resid€ndal
- Irllr9q9
-l|tr.k
ht Ph
- 9d.4,
or-Serl.|t.cd.row,
50511
05 55tHq O6rny Re!&d
'agaf fs:
!:.
71 1@
s
n
o0 : I
&66F
L2
00 00
n0^
ro^
Al.
sP€'@D.

SP€Frc,PO
SPSIFfD
SP€S
9$l@o
_ ot 01
oor oot
,'-.9
I
f-
i
i
!
'I
-t
tr
ir
,G.
l-_- -
t
.'.-T.-. -,.

I _..
rgi
.^ l.-.. -..1.
'. -r .t
'- {-
:I-rf,:l"'l
* ,^:--
-'lbrrrNc
.a*-+-_-
FLAN
VEST1NG TEITAI]VE SJBDIVISON MAP
TOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
_ft1A:E?,[tsxtBsqa ^|=|
I
/'. PXOPOSED ENTITI.EMENXS I,IIIIH I'IIS

APPUCANON
Shom h@ ir tDe propqed lolt EIODIEIS At FOUOA4 n^t C,' PHASF 2 Sman Lol Vetl'mg feriot-re SubdivirJos ,, op lo.nog ph.o.

REGEilCf aesidenl,'ol homeslles wru be provided o.r tol! IROIHERS At FOtSOt 8At{Cfi PHASE 2. The proposed Smo[ Lor Vesting Tentslive Mop 5eeb io lurlhs rubdivde Phose 2 [6,1,7ocj inlo 329 rsidenliol hon6it6 including singlqlomily ottoched lrynhere uniE {MLD-lee{imple unitsJ on 43'x80' lor^ ln oddfion, singl+fomily delochel units {SFHD) including 50'x95', 55'x95 ond 65'x95 loh ore provided. Given lhe lorgel morket, oll octivsdJlt hores ore linglejtoD ond €oryord 5poce is purposively reduced lo minimize moinlenonca, The rsidentiol horesil€ oitenhgs ond p'6ucl orchit&lure n REGENCY Phose 2 ore ihe some o5 thoi opproved in lhe REGENCY Phose I oreo.

Mvltiple occe$ point: to the Pro.iecl q'e provided ot Mongini Po.kwoy ond qt Regacy Porkwoy, which csnrcfs lo the REGENCY PhoF I oreo. lmprovements lo lhese roodwoys hove b€n/ore being conshucied. C1y stondord residentiol streets qe p.opsgd fq this subdivisiq, wilh &foched ond otlocned pedstrion sidewdk5 ond on4tr€t porkingr Cl6s lll bike routes qe p{ovided q oll rsidenticl sl@is.

The CopiiolSoutheor Conn€ciq;s plonKi ot the soulh of the Proiecl greo which irproves White RocK Rood hom o locolfwq{one rmdwoy ro o 4- lo &bne regiono/ tntroughfde. Clos I Tdt'Fpurpose lroils ore plonned on While Rock R@d ond ihe Proiecl provides o pedeslrion conntrt'F lo lhis.eg'pnol lrqil. No di'recl vehiculor accss lo the Ppiect site is provided otf while Rock Rood. lmprovemenls ro Whie Rock Rm6, :ncluding the odjocent troil coridor ond londscoping, ore by oiha6-
sfltu8ER r6,2@t
€ rg!:sM TOI-I 3RO?}lERs,r.T TOLSOM RA:\iCl'i I PHASE 2 ToIIBrothers PROJECT T{ARRAIIVE
P1t

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
lhe propGed snotr to, Vestiog tenlorive Svbdivrtion ,Aop N&,niEy grqtlE qd cttahoge ptoo and gekninoy ufitity plor ae 5rrown hse.

Ex6ting tooogroptry on lhe site ronges from opp.oxirclely 326 1o 399' in elevolion. Reloining rcll5 ore necsory lo rcinroin d6v6lopoble oreos ond inlended rdd grodOs ond de shoM m lhe SLVTSM grcding ond droinoge pl6n.
"t'
u-az
\r

PRAMNARY GRADING PIAN

VESNNG TEMAIIVE SUBDVISION MAP
TOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
PHASE 2
!!Ef{!s@r 1=::
*
TOLL BROTHERS ot

FOLSOM RANCH
PRETIMINARY UIIUIY PtAN
V€STING TEMATIVT SUEDIVISION MP
PHASE 2#
', ttrr'
- _i\_.
fgfngt rtr! ':'=
J.-
'ir
- -.\-lv'-'-t ,t
) /' -:4,., /
2i
An opon spoce rclurol drolnoga cdidor is locoted on bolh siles of the subFcl property. Developr€nl ruiotl d(oinoge trom lhe Preps 11e*r *nh to Hydrcmodiffcolion Bsin (HMBI f | 6 lndthwfftem podicn ot the sile) ond Combo Eosin # 5 {southwestem portion of ths rlel. HMB #t6 is being blriltwith tf€TOLI SROII,ERS oi FOISOM RANCH projoct and i: locclod norlh ol Mongini porkwoy. Combo fS i5 bcoted west of the Pfoieci on th€ high shool sit€ Ond is being buit by otheta

PROJECT NARRAIIVE
lF !9H9M IOtt BROTHERS AT FOTSOM RANCH I PHASE 2
SEMSER 16,MI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
ne prcpored t€e
Prwdlon I eemoval
There qre notive Ook
lrees locqled within the
bounds ol the Poject
ond lrees ore popoFo
ior €moYd with this
opplicolion. Tre6
proped for removol
ore wiihin the qeq
shNn in the FPAsP 6
Develqpoue Ar@- The
lEe svmrcry toble
shown here cof,1oi6
the deioils regording
the incfvidual Ook hes.

ToIlBrothers
Erc.r&sgt
\ 'J
r6 -<t:
2-<'3
+
,52t6' ,.'& &
.#--
f,s 3 3-o..
\
IEGEND
e 'Jiffi!'o?#"r'"'*""'
i fuOEM@DUEbLfuNfu$t @>t Fu>t
SJr - DW&U@||mGMUNSLWRttnow^tP/s
| | uNno,o8wDLMDtNP^d
Tree Presenation I Removal Exhibit
foli Biothers
* -
at Folsom Ranch
Phase 2
*.i.if" trldr.rqg$ *1m
whrle Rock Rcad

FROIECT IIARIANVE
i por-sov TOLL EROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH I PHASE 2
sflffiR16 &r

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

MINOR ADI,I,NISIRANVE AA'E'9D'IEIV[
(MAM) - fiaiEl€r ol Deyebpment Rtgils
lhe propoted tcrl.l Snoft tRS Prl Sf 2
Imruter of Dev€ropmea, tlgttr lrir'bt b
JftowD ,t*.

A lronsfer of Development Rights {TDR} '6
sughl for lhe konsfer d\relling unil5 betw@n
porcels ownad/contiolled by the Applicont
os shoM bdow.
€Xl:TTilG DAI'f
. Pqcel 1724 - SFHD 345du
. Porcel 1728 - MLD 75d0
. Porcel l98-SF20du
. Porcal 26 - SF 83du
. Porcel 27 - SF 46du
. Parcel5S-SF338OU
908 fofol units contoined in lhe obove
PorceE
PRC'POSED OATA:
. Pqrcel l72A -SFHD 257du {€9dul
. Porcel l72B - MID 72du l-3du)
. Porcel ItB-St 23du (+sdul
OAK AVAJUE HOID'NG. LrC.
. Porcel 26 - 5F 90du (+7du)
HITISEOROUGH NORIH, I-LC.
. Porcel27-SF 50du {+4dul
HITSBOROUGH NORI}I. IIC.
. Pffiel58-SF,tl6du (+78dul
WFST PRAIRIE ESIAIES, I.IC.
9M lolol unib conlained rn lhe oboye
Pqrceli
hoposed porcels reel density ronge
requirenenti 05 sel fqth in lhe FPASP.

Tronrler porcels de @ned by lhe Proiect
Owner os shown ffi Poge 3 (ond shown in
pink bdes or aightl. ond reip'ent pdceb os
rhiln obove lond shoM in green boxes ot
d9hU.
tha p.opdld trotrthr dct nol Grlt in qr
TollBrothers
'E
I
t?A$ rt t28
E ddhg: tSdu
Propodr t2dc
G!du)
iPra? tita
ExBtlng: &tdu
Prop@d: 9odu
(+tdul
tras? rtt2a
Al'lEEg6d,
trcpc.d 2tdu
(-E dr)
Ffr6P r:17
E*tng;46du
P.op6€(t SOdu
{+adr)
:-,-P"-\
t?Ast *5E
CdrfingE 38du
P'opor.d 4l6du
(+tsdu)
f?Ast tltldlht:20ds
P.op6cd: 2!du
l+gds)
N
I
I
"+,
s
Legend
-;- FPASPParelNumber
-,:- (Se Table 4 3 fo{ mce detair )
Drvell ine Un it Allocation
FolWhn
(1t1 olfol'on. Cruf6ni'
||lAelil&l0ms a$isdr4,.!o:o
sFBSER 16,&I
,: FOLSOM ;oLL 3nc]!i:R5 A? FCLSC'\,4. RA.h!Ci-t i pt{,A3r 2

PROJECI NARTAIIVE
?14

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
s .\;';i;1)t;Minor Adminisfiolive Amendment CompfFnce - IRAIJSfEn Of DEWIUNG UNrI5 ibe ?roposed enlillemenh see( o Minor Administrotive Amencimenl {MAM) ro the FPASP 2Ot I wi1n a Ironsler ol Development Righh (IDR], os onicipored ond oemiti-ed in the FpASp 2Oll, Chopte. 13 lmplemenfolion. Section 13-3.1 Minor Acmiristctive Amendment The FPASP 20ll permils flexibiliry ,n lronsiering residenuol unit oilocolions (onc comGcioi buitding qs allocoiioNl to rellrct chonging morket demnd. Tronsfer ot residenliot unii ollocqt'rcn! ore ollowed 6 o MAM consisle.i with FPASP 2Cl l, Chopts l3 tmp ementotion, Section I3,3.2 Tronsfer ol Development Righls.

Thit p{oposd tronsfs of unih does not odd oddifionol dwetling unils to the FPASP, hor does o chonqe;n populolicn ressil lrom lhis lronsfs ol unit!. Ihis propcsed tronsfer cf dwetling units d@s not chonge lhe lono use designot'pro/dirkibutions ol lhe unirs, The donor ond rgceiver Pcrcels remqin consisten: with ihe density ronges cllowed in ?he FPASP.

FPASP 201I Sectim 4.7 dssibes lhe conlexl in which iron5fq of residentioL units is expected of likely lo occur. "Ihe FPASP pe.mih odjustments fo the reJr'dent'oi lond u€ mjx fo retlect sms/ti€ noi!.o, leolwei os re,l os chffighg mot*el demond t6 o pofticvtor hesing type. T(onsfet ol unils 15 p€tmilted beiween res,iCenn:ol porceB govided thot lhe PIon Ateo moximun entiilemenl of jl.16l dwelling unih is nol erceeded except by omendre4t ot the FPASP, Eoch reedentiot deveiicpmenl psce? i5 cl,moted O Certoir nomber ot dwelline unriJ lsee fPASP lCble 4.31. lt a porce, is developed cl les lhon ils ofltrotpn number, lhe €morning unbuift unils moy EiEnitered to onofhe. r$idenfiol p6cet q porceLs. lncreoss s d{@ses h reldent,ol density resulliig kon unil t@nsrers shol not be ,ess lhon ,he minimum ry exceed lhe moximun o{owobte deEily 16 eoch feydentior tqnd tr cotegory un,e$ o reguest to i,4seose ry deseqse rhe denity is occomponied wilh c Spectic P/on Amendment oppFcotion puruonl lo Sectbn 13.3.1." ln cddilion to the requiremenls os set torlh in Section 4.7 of lhe FPASP 201 I lobovel, the City 5holl opprove resid€ntiol dreiling unit konsteR or dcnsity odiurtments bclwegn ony Pton Arso rsidenliol lond ure porcsl d porcels. govid€d lhe foliow;ng condilions ore met (belowl, r.:f;:Ja: O;:-r:ilrii-,;:t.i?:r'- i.\:..|,., .1_..1 ,_;_! a.)t- )!t.- t.i|,.:),1 ,-r:..,. - a : t:iat.

Ihe lroCsgr snd tondse porcel or pqceb qa bccl€d wllhh lhe Pfon Ars ond qc dglgnoled tq ts?sliql use. /".3 '.:ir'r'yirr J.c ;':..j€.;: e o.aerj ,ri :i.')tal :;r.:ir. t. , ?tit ;\t'atj Ct. JaS,9:..)t::t tat .," t-:t:;1t ai ,r. I Ihe honsterq ond tqclqe pqrcel q pqseh contqm io q[ qppllcoHc deyeloprcnl slondqdsconlqinedinAppendlxA-1i:?rrr.j'e.oi.--rijt.)^.lci.:?)()aai!\-;tta:.tttrr 1i, aii lp3,jcr?!:r!',,'-ra!iia' | ,ltr'\lrva :c.!l,rl('o . l.c?c'rtiJl /\ Ihe tsqElq d unls ds @l r6ull ln ln@qsd hnpoctr b€yond lhos ldenliLd ln the fPASP Em/E|s. i;hJ ir:^:ri. Jl it^:l: ,ta*7..(rr ;cJur: ' (\a:e)\xJ .a.t:cc. ) be,c.d t.,:ae Ja.i'"?:1 .. :he Ftl jF FrR'!,j.,r
Iho |tonCat d unlb dos rct odysdy impoct plqnncd lnftGtruclur€, reodffyr, kh6ls,q olher publlc loc&lost ofiddoblc ho!*rg cgEamerk; or teG Frcgroms qnd o$srmenl dbltr-sls unbs sh lmposG qe rcdsced to on occeDtqble leyel lhouEh prciect-rpecfrc nllgolion nequE, ,ire 'ttt':|.:, )' !!t:i iltlt . at e1:eaett ,t.'cJa' g tnna3 ^ iar.toa:'i! : ft)oc^(:1.: ;(.' a'c,:. a. oa ca ?rb.,a rcc,;r':5 :r"/:c5re icL- .:
?5r€l:f?,: \r Oi l\r!: C1:.a.,1rrn- i J i!5C:!'' i,'l:1,;frr:':.i t
Shdn otdgtr, lr the IOtl.tROtHEiS,ArFol'oltl tAilCH PrlA€ 2 tnu,i'ottue Mop. lhlr t usltqtive mp is cffieptuo, ior ilGtErlve purpds orr'y. ^{tdq
pfinematl/E lo t',e Han tfiya
ocscred, ord wii cmrlnG lo occur. G Itre projal is li{tier re,hed. dpei,icoty ctue ro groding and il$wdbn ol Oot lrees ond ol'ls oqtwot t€orues The tollcwing poges describe ond illust.ole lhe Prolect's otlribules.

ToIIBrothers
r--
s€x€M8EF r42@t
FROJESTNARIaTVE
-
"J
I
's sft{D
I t
t
*
t ta
- I aaa
/
tilD
SfHD
Gofad
Enlry
€ rp+:gvr TorL BRoTHERs AT For-soM nnHcffi

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
v-:--r::, _
,

TEGENCY AT FOLSOITA RANCH

PHASE T
(AcIve Adutl Comnunlty)
the rO[[ StOtHEtS At FOlJOlt RANCfl
Ovm[ llrulttEtte Mop & rhown hsc.

Four {41 distinct lot: sizs ore offsed in
REGENCY Ph@ 2- Homsire offeringr in
REGNCY Ph@ 2 ore thg sme os lhose
opProved for Ph@ l. except fd one
prcducl ine {60170' lol5l being offered in
Phose I only.

Neighborhood wolkobiiry;s of lsemost
impqtonce io ocliv+odull homebuyeE,
ond wolking b repoded 6 lha 'number one'
octivity soughl by the ActiveAdult morket,
Ihe Prcject b dsigned to promote
wolkobility qnd ne'ghbor inferoclion.
liultiPre ttorrhcods ore provided. Thse i5
o Closs I trol iocfrty locored on dl5ides of
fhe koFct ond internol Prc*ect troithfrcls
ore provided lo connect lo lhe troil rolde.

The irqil system ln lhe open spoce w;ll rercln
open lo the public lor unimpeded oublic
u5o8€.

Cl6 I rulti-purp@ troik ore locqted olqg
th€ oroinoge coridoF in the Open Spoce
reoi flhe tok ore identr'fied an the FPASP
Troils Erhibif.l Trofl conneciions ore ptrovided
ol Mongini Porkwoy c well os intemolfy Fom
rhe project site vio pedestrbn p@os. The
peddtrion pose6 ore pwpffily lcqled to
promole pedeshion occesibifity where
d'ctoted by trol groding corotoints- lhe
open spoce/droinoge cgn'do6 we
mopped G o porl ot the p{evios loll
Broihs entillemenls-
sFTffit6.m!
. '1rllir!.l- ,
a
- .-:rlll aa ,AT FOISOM RANCI{
PI{ASC 2
(Fulqc Acllve Adstl Ccmmunlty)
d .diir.i.;a'lll-si . r]v^ra.<Ens
llusl'oflYe Mosls Plon Exhlbfl
rott BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH
Cby ddon Asqd3r-&
ToIIBroflrers
lRr8lrr&sonATIADMONAr

HOIAESIIES
PROJECTNARIAflVE
-
€ 59HgM TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH I PH;FIIIiI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Regency Po*woy (RPJ is fhe domr.onl slreef cry.bor in the Proi*t Areo ond witl extend kom E6t gidwelt Sieel .

Pho5e I lo Mongni Po*woy iri Phose 2. Thb enho.ced pimory residentiq slreel feot!.e5 one novet to.e in eoch c,rection ond qn-5lreef slriped bi(e lones- lhis sfeet is deigned to meel the ROw 5londords lor FPASP Locor Str*t vi.

O. eoch sjde of the dreet ore 24' wide lre-lineo londscope cotridors with detoched 8' sid*olks These tondscope coridors ore envisioned os 'Pedeslr'€n Promenodes" ihoi liFk the vorious recreoiion locilitis onc dog po.ks ond wit encouroge wclking lhroughout ihe ccmmunity. Mircr residenriol streers [with sidewotks on both s,cjes] cre toid out perpendiculs to Regency Porkwcy such ihot r€sidentrial fotrt dooE lesd ro ddewotkr. rfdcyolt! ,cod io Segercy Pokrolr, ood legeqcy Pqkwqy l@dslo lie Kreotton omsitba Homesiles guroo5ely do nol lront onto Regency Pcrkwoy. lhol woy lhse ore no cslicls beveen reside,rllo drivewoys, pederlrions ond bicycli5is olong lhe porkwsy.

Primoty ResidenliorStteets (V) withir rhe Projecl ,eoc cireciy 1.om rhe gored entiies to lhe primory ond Secoodory RKr€tlon Amenities. ihis slr€i leoture5froni-on or side-on residentiollols wilh londscope plonteE ond celoched sioewolks, snd it consistenl wiih FPASP L@ol Steet V.

Minot Residentio, Srfeets {wJ qre ihe dominonl (esidentiol slreef secf ion used ihroughwr :he project ond ieoilres oilochecj sidewolks on colh sides. lhis strret seclion is consisrenl wiln FpAjp Streel Secljon w_ dksf,
EEq|
ln oddilion io the privo'€ retreciioool omenilies provioed in the Pnose I oreo. dctdilionoromenities qe olso orovided in the REGENCY Phcse 2 oreo"
A Recteotion Amenlly {l.2oc i. sizeJ is p.ovided within Phose 2 ol the REGE{'ICY nomesites ond wil fecture o lorge gross omphiiheoter for concerts in lhe poft q o weelsd fotmer's mcrker. Severol nouer privote oreo5 Jor dinngporties d more inlimole onc infmol socio, goihe.ings wilt a so oe prgvided. This ome.rty is cLdenTly being dBgned. aa t-
t
t
*F
A "Ba* Pd,rk"
(0.50c dog oorki with
€pdcte icrge ond
srcll dog oreos, will
c{loin o co9.
woshrng Slolion. dog-
occeS5ible cnnking
fountoio. ond shqde
slrvcture lor
homeowns to enjoy
wotching thei OO9S
scioliz6. Addrfionolly.
dog oretr dEy be
proviced 3i the
Secoidory Ameni:ies
ci well: octuo detign
oi lhere cmenilie5 il in
pro9re55.

TARGE DOG WATER FOUNTAN
SPECfrEN Otr ]R€E
SULL 006 WAIER FOUNTAN

SWDOGMA

EENCH SEATITG
rTYF I
rua'uR$€a
uaf,rgrE
CAXIILEVER€O
SHAO€ SIRUCTURE
CATILEVERED SMD€
STRffiURE
t!GEXCt PraXvraY
uActo@ma 0001[^9{gt^noN
r+.iI
Mr& &
t/.+ t !l I+--.-.--
e FOLSOM TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH I PHASE 2
ffPIEMEER I6 ryI
?ROJEST NARRANVE
P17

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 16
Environmental Memorandum
Dated September 7,2021

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301
Date: September 9,2021
To Steve Banks, Principal Planner, City of Folsom
From: Kim Untermoset Project Manager, Ascent Environmental, lnc.

Subject: Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2, Environmental lnformation Supporting Determination that Potential lmpacb Are Adequately Addressed by the Scope of the Environmental Checklist and Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community
At the request of the City of Folsom (City), Ascent has prepared this evaluation of the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with Phase 2 of Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch (hereinafter referred to as the "project"). This evaluation also assesses whether the potential impacts are within the scope of analysis of and adequately addressed by the Environmental Checklist and Addendum to the Final Environmental lmpact ReporVEnvironmental lmpact Statement (Final EIR/EIS) for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2008092051) prepared for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community and certified by the Folsom City Council in March 2020. This analysis was prepared to determine whether new or different impacts associated with the project would occur because of changes in circumstances (i.e., the length of time since the prior EIR's analysis), pursuant to Section 15162 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Project Location
The 64.7-acre project site is in the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community, a development in the southern portion of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP). The FPASP is located within Folsom, south of U.S.

Highway 50 and north of White Rock Road, between Prairie City Road and the El Dorado County line (see Figure 1).

The FPASP encompasses a total of 3,585 acres. The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community encompasses 314 acres in the Alder Ranch and Mangini West sub-plan areas of the FPASP area. The development is bounded on the north by Mangini Parkway, on the east by East Bidwell Street on the south by White Rock Road, and on the west by Oak Avenue Parkway (see Figure 2).

Project Background
On June 28,2011, the Folsom City Council approved (Resolution No. 8863) the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) for development of up to'10,210 residential housing units in a range of housing types, styles, and densities along with commercial, industrial/office park, and mixed-use land uses, open space, public schools, parks and infrastructure projected to occur on the approximate 3.585-acre site (City of Folsom 2010; City of Folsom 2011). The FPASP was updated in 2018 to include all the various approved plan amendments and mapping modifications made since the first approval in 2011, As amended, the FPASP provides for additional residential development, up to a total of 11,461 housing units.

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

I
I
I
I
Fz3o(t
Eul
F
o
a
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

tl
\ 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---._._ PIACER
f1
\
\,
Ft
Fi'Za>,3rLo;zt t:t j
ei82tU
H!8
*$r''
'F-.

Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2021
Figure 1 Regional Location
Location
9-J aA
ESRI Basemap
a.a' \.,.
@

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

ffi Toll BrothersatFolsonl Ra,rch
Phase 2 (Project Site)
K-X-X loll Brothers at l-otson Ranch
Master Planned Corntnunity
l-- -- I Folsonr South o{ U5. 50
Specific Plan Area Bourrclary
LSRI ltttagery
0 1,/50 J,5
-==-
rc
r9010076.02 ot5 002
0cr
teet
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2021
Figure 2 Project Vicinity
@

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

On March 10,2020, the Folsom City Council approved the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community (Resolution No. 10400). An environmental checklist and addendum were prepared, in compliance with CEQA, and was certified by the Folsom City Council. The approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community consists of a new residential community o11,225 housing units in the southern portion of the FPASP. The development includes two phases. Phase 1 includes 801 housing units and is under construction. Phase 2 was approved for an additional 421active adult homes to be built in the future and required submittal of an additional subdivision map (City of Folsom 2020).

Project Description
The project would include approval of the subdivision map and a minor administrative modification for Phase 2 of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The project would reduce the number of dwelling units proposed from 421 units previously approved by the Folsom City Council in 2A2A to 329 units. No other changes from the previously approved development are proposed.

Grading activities for the project would begin in Fall 2021. Subdivision improvements are anticipated to begin in April 2022 and would progress intermittently through November 2023, conditional on market demands and weather.

Construction of the Toll Brothers site would occur between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and if necessary, between I a.m. and 5 p.m., Saturday through Sunday. Construction equipment would be consistent with the equipment used in for the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. According to the applicant development of the project would not require any material import or export from off-site locations.

Consideration of Changed Circumstances
As noted above, on June 28, 2011, the City certified an EIVEIS for the FPASP that evaluated up to 1Q210 residential housing units in a range of housing types, styles, and densities along with commercial, industrial/office park, and mixed-use land uses, open spacg public schools, parks and infrastructure projected to occur on the approximate 3,585-acre site (FPASP area). Several addendums and subsequent environmental documents have been approved since 2011. The FPASP was updated in 2018 to include all of the various approved plan amendments and mapping modifications made since the first approval in 2011. As amended, the FPASP provides for additional residential development, up to a total of 11,461 housing units.

On March 10,202A, the Folsom City Council approved the Toll Brothers Specific Plan Amendment and an Amendment to the Folsom General Plan and an Addendum to the Final Environmental lmpact Report/Environmental lmpact Statement (Resolution No. 10400) for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The approved SPA allowed for the reallocation of residential and park land use designations within the FPASP area. The SPA did not change the number of dwelling units or total park acreage in the FPASP area.

Due to the length of time since the certification of the ElR, the additional discretionary review required for the requested entitlements, and reduction of dwelling units from the previously approved development, the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 project was evaluated for potential new/different impacts and in compliance with Section 15152 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Per Section 15162(b), if changes to a project or its circumstances or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required due to new information, new significant effects, or substantially more adverse impacts, Othenrvise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation.

Based on the analysis presented below, the impacts of the project are determined to be adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Environmental Checklist and Addendum for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community, and no further documentation under CEQA is required, ASCENT

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

EnvironmentaI Analysis
Using Appendix G, Environmental Checklist, of the State CEQA Guidelines as an analytical tool, the following discussion evaluates the potential environmental impacts of implementation of the project in the context of the FPASP EIR/EIS and Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum to determine if those impacts are sufficiently covered, or if additional analysis is necessary. All mitigation measures referenced in this section are included in Appendix A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Aesthetics
lmplementation of the proJect would involve the development of a residential subdivision within the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The project would result in fewer dwelling units, would affect the same area already analyzed and would not substantially alter the development type or density at the site such that different or more severe aesthetic impacts would result. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A.1-1: Construct and Maintain a Landscape Corridor Adjacent to U.S. 50 > Mitigation Measure 34.1-4: Screen Construction Staging Areas > Mitigation Measure 3A.1-5: Establish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and lmplement a Lighting Plan
The potential environmental impacts related to aesthetics and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Asriculturat and Forestrv Resources
lmplementation of the project would involve the development of a residential subdivision within the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The project would affect the same area already analyzed and the site is not designated as or currently in agricultural production, is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide lmportance, and is not under Williamson Act contract. There were no mitigation measures included in the FPASP EIR/EIS for this topic and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

The potential environmental impacts related to agricultural resources and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Alr Quatitv
The project would result in similar construction activity, development area, and same type of construction-generated emissions as previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS, The project would result in 92 fewer dwelling units than the previously approved development. However, no substantial changes to the land use type or intensity from the previous evaluation are proposed. A project specific analysis of air quality impacts related to construction and operation of the project was previously conducted for the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1a: lmplement Measures to Control Air Pollutant Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements
@

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September $ 202'l

> Mitigation Measure 34.2-1b: Pay Off-site Mitlgation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOx Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1c: Analyze and Disclose Projected PM10 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resulting from Construction of On-Site Elements > Mitigation Measure 3A.2-2: lmplement All Measures Prescribed by the Air Qualiry Mitigation Plan to Reduce Operational Air Pollutant Emissions
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4a: Develop and lmplement a Plan to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Construction-Generated Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b: lmplement Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants
> Mitigation Measure 34.2-5: lmplement a Site lnvestigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary Prepare and lmplement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-6: lmplement Measures to Control Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Odorous Emissions
Potential environmental impacts related to air quality and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenrise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Biological Resources
A project-level analysis was conducted for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community and refinements to the mitigation program were approved to further reduce impacts to special-status species (ECORP 2A19a\.lmplementation of the project would involve the development of a residential subdivision within the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The project would affect the same area already analyzed and would not substantially alter the development type or density at the site such that different or more severe biological impacts would result.
lmpact 3A.3-5 of the FPASP EIR/ElS concluded that the removal of blue oak woodland and individual oak trees and other trees would conflict with local ordinances protecting these resources and would result in a significant impact. lmplementation of Mitigation Measure 3A,3-5 would lessen the impacts on blue oak woodland and other trees because it would require the applicant to implement an oak woodland mitigation plan and other measures to avoid and minimize impacts on oak woodlands, However, the FPASP EIR/EIS concluded that even with the mitigation, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable because the loss of individual oak trees and blue oak woodland acreage and function would be extensive and would contribute substantially to the regional loss of this resource. The Arborist Suruey Report and Mitigotion Strategy prepared for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Project by ECORP Consulting, lnc., in January 2020 identified '17.9 acres of oak woodland and 112 living oak trees within the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community area, The Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum found that the master planned community would disturb 7.79 acres of oak woodland and 90 individual oak trees. fhe Arborist Survey Report for Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch, Phase 1 and Backbone lnfrastructure Projects, provided project-specific analysis for Phase 1 of the master planned community and determined that 3.43 acres of oak woodland and 36 individual oak trees would be affected by Phase 1 of the master planned community. A Tree Preservation / Removal Exhibit was prepared for Phase 2 of the master planned community (i.e., the project) in April 2021.The project would result in impacts to 0.68 acre of oak woodland and the removal of 25 individual blue oak trees. Two additional blue oak trees would be studied for the feasibility to be preserved during the preparation of grading and/or improvement plans. Of AsCENI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsorn Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

the 25 trees proposed for removal, 9 trees are proposed for removal due to poor health and/or structure of the tree.

The remaining 16 trees are proposed for removal due to location or requiring a cut or fill of greater than 5 feet. ln addition, as required by Mitigation Measure 3A,3-5, an Oak Tree Mitigation Plan consistent with the approved Conceptual Oak Tree Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the FPASP would be prepared for the project. As concluded in the FPASP EIR/EIS, even with the mitigation, the impact to oak woodland and individual oak trees would remain significant and unavoidable because the loss of individual oak trees and blue oak woodland acreage and function would be extensive and would contribute substantially to the regional loss of this resource. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.3-5, impacts related to the disturbance of oak woodland and the removal of individual oak trees from development of Phase 1 and Phase 2 (36 oak trees and 25 oak trees, respectively) would not exceed the impacts previously analyzed. ln fact, through compliance with Mitigation Measure 3A.3-5 in the EIR/EIS, the applicant has lessened the total number of trees that would be affected from 90 to potentially 63 (2 are being studied for feasibility of preservation). No new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts would occur.

The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1a: Design Stormwater Drainage Plans and Erosion and Sediment Control Plans to Avoid and Minimize Erosion and Runoff to All Wetlands and Other Waters That Are to Remain in the SPA and Use Low lmpact Development (LlD) Features
> Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1b: Secure Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and lmplement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Waters of the State > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2a: Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson's Hawk and Other Raptor Nests > Mitigation Measure 3A,3-2b: Prepare and lmplement a Swainson's Hawk Mitigation Plan > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2c Avoid and Minimize lmpacts to Tricolored Blackbird Nesting Colonies > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2d: Avoid and Minimize lmpacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts > Mitigation Measure 3A,3-29: Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool lnvertebrates and lmplement All Permit Conditions
> Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4a: Secure and lmplement Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4b: Conduct Surveys to ldentifu and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; lmplement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-5: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and lmplement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and lmplement Measures to Avoid and Minimize lndirect lmpacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On Site
ln addition, following project-specific analysis completed for the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, the below refinements to the mitigation program are applicable to the project (ECORP 2019a). The mitigation measures are numbered as found in the Biological Resources Technical Memorondum for the Regency at Folsom Ranch Project Specific Plan Amendment provided by ECORP in July 20'19. > Mitigation Measure WS-1: Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for Construction Employees > Mitigation Measure WS-2: Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey > Mitigation Measure NWPT-I: Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle Survey > Mitigation Measure NB-l: Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey ASCENI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

fhe potential environmental impacts related to biological resources and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenrvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis,
9ultural Resources
lmplementation of the project would involve development of a residential subdivision and would require construction and ground disturbance within the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. A report was prepared summarizing the project-specific information related to historic and cultural resources for the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum (ECORP 2019b). The FPASP applicants entered into a programmatic agreement with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and subsequent review of historic resources pertaining to the FPASP area was conducted. As a result of the extensive work on historic resources since the FPASP EIR/EIS was certified, the mitigation measures from the FPASP EIR/EIS addressing historic resources were refined to more specifically address the project site. The project would affect the same area already analyzed and would not change the nature, type, or severity of impact to historical or archaeological resources. To be consistent with the more specific requirements found in the Historic Properly Treatment Plan and the programmatic agreement, the following refinements to the mitigation program are applicable to the project.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.5-1a:Comply with the Programmatic Agreement > Mitigation Measure 3A.5-1b: Perform an lnventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided
> Mitigation Measure 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring lf Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required
> Mitigation Measure 34.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures The potential environmental impacts related to cultural resources and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplementa I environmental analysis.

Enerqv
Consistent with the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, the project would result in the conversion of previously planned traditional homes to age-restricted homes, would generate less vehicle trips than previously determined in the FPASP EIR/E|S, and would be subject to more stringent regulations related to energy. The trip generation analysis included in the Regency at Folsom Ranch Draft Transportation lmpod Study found that based on ITE trip rates, the conversion of traditional homes to age-restricted homes would result in estimated daily trip generation ol 6,716 and an overall FPASP area daily trip generation reduction of 3,433 trips below the approved FPASP (T. Kear 2019). ln addition, the project would result in 92 fewer residential units than previously analyzed, resulting in less energy demand. The project would continue to comply with Title 24 requirements, which were updated in 2019 and include renewable energy and energy efficiency requirements to reduce energy consumption in new residences by 53 percent. The project would not result in substantial land use changes or an increase in population from the approved FPASP. The project would comply with general plan policies related to renewable energy or energy efficiency and would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The @

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

project would affect the same area already analyzed and would not alter the development type or density at the site such that different or more severe impacts to energy would result. No mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

Potential environmental impacts related to energy use and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Geoloqv and Soils
lmplementation of the project would involve development of a residential subdivision. The project would affect the same area analyzed for development in the FPASP EIR/EIS and proposed changes would not substantially alter the development type or density at the site, No changes related to seismic activity, ground shaking, ground failure, landslides have occurred. No changes in soils at the site have occurred and the project would not require septic systerns. Because the development of the project would result in a similar footprint for ground disturbance as the approved FPASP, the impact conclusions pertaining to paleontological resources remain unchanged. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.7-1a: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and lmplement Appropriate Recommendations
> Mitigation Measure 34.7-1b: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities > Mitigation Measure 3A.7-3: Prepare and lmplement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan > Mitigation Measure 34.7-5: Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations > Mitigation Measure 3A.7-10: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Archeological or Paleontological Resources Are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and lmplement a Recovery Plan as Required
The potential environmental impacts related to geology and soils and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The types of emissions-generating construction activity would generally be the same under the project as evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS. Developrnent would be similar in area, size, and intensity to what was approved under the FPASP. For these reasons, the project would not result in any new circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts pertaining to construction-generated GHG emissions then were identified in the FPASP EIR/EIS. The project would not result in substantial changes to the type and intensity of development, would result in lower daily traffic due to a reduction of dwelling units and conversion of traditional homes to age-restricted homet and would comply with more stringent regulations related to GHG reductions than previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved. > Mitigation Measure 34.4-1: lmplement Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions @

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

> Mitigation Measure 3A.4-2b: Participate in and lmplement an Urban and Community Forestry Prograrn and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees
Potential environmental impacts related to GHG emissions and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required, Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherurise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The project would not change the overall pattern of development or the types of hazardous materials that would be used, handled, or transported to the site than previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS. No changes to the conditions of the site or the presence of hazardous materials has occurred since approval of the FPASP. The project site is located outside of Area 40 and the carve-out area and would not be located on Cortese-listed site. No new airports have been developed near the project site and implementation of the project would not conflict with any adopted emergency response or evacuation plans. No changes to the location of the project have occurred and no changes to the risks from wildfires has occurred since approval of the FPASP. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A.8-2: Complete lnvestigations Related to the Extent to Which Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and ll Environmental Site Assessments and lmplement Required Measures
> Mitigation Measure 3A.8-6: Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure > Mitigation Measure 34.8-7: Prepare and lmplement a Vector Control Plan in Consuhation with the Sacramento- Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District
The potential environmental impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequenVsupplemental environmental analysis.

Hvdrolosv and Water Quality
The project would require grading and construction and could result in significant impacts to water quality because of soil disturbance during construction and alteration of water flows over the site, consistent with the findings of the FPASP EIR/ElS. The project would not substantially change development patterns and the area of impermeable surfaces from that approved in the FPASP. The areas along Alder Creek stream and its tributaries would generally be preserved as open space. The project would not result in substantial changes to the drainage patterns or ffood flows beyond those anticipated in the FPASP. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if project were approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A9{:Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and lmplement SWPPP and BMPs > Mitigation Measure 3A.9-2: Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and lmplement Requirements Contained in Those Plans
> Mitigation Measure 34.9-3: Develop and lmplement a BMP and Water Quality Maintenance Plan > Mitigation Measure 3A.9-4: lnspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream of the Project Site and Make lmprovements if Necessary
ASCENI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

The potential environmental impacts related to hydrology and water quality and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/E15 and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required, Furlher, pursuant to Section '15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequenVsupplemental environmental analysis.

Land Use and Plannlnt
lmplementation of the project would result in a residential subdivision consistent with the previously approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The project would result in 92 fewer residential units than previously analyzed, However, no substantial changes to the type and intensity of development are proposed, The project would not result in the physical division of established communities, nor conflict with FPASP land use policies and regulations that protect the environment. There were no mitigation measures included in the FPASP EIR/EIS for this topic and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue, The potential environmental impacts related to land use and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Mineral Resources
The project would be located within the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The site is not in an area associated with mineral resources or mineral extraction. Therefore. the project would have no impact on kaolin clay resources and impacts on construction aggregate would remain less than significant. As such, the potential environmental impacts related to mineral resources and associated with implementation of the project are consistent with the conclusions of the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Noise and Vibration
Construction of the project would result in shorl-term increases in noise related to construction vehicles and equipment. However, construction activities would require similar types and numbers of equipment operating at similar levels of intensity as previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS. ln compliance with FPASP EIR/E|S Mitigation Measure 3A.11-4, a site-specific analysis was conducted to determine future traffic noise levels within the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community site (which includes the project). Based on the results of the site-specific traffic noise analysis, the project would result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to traffic noise levels above the City's traffic noise standard of 60 dB Lu^ and 45 dB Lon, for outdoor and indoor noise levels, respectively. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.13{ and 4.13-2 identified in the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum would reduce impacts associated with implementation of the project. The project would result in the same land use, development types and intensity as previously evaluated and would not result in impacts related to long-term exposure of sensitive receptors to increased stationary-source noise levels from project operation beyond those identified in the FPASP EIR/EIS. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A.11-1: lmplement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and lmplement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors > Mitigation Measure 3A.11-3: lmplement Measure to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities AsCENT

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 202'l

> Mitigation Measure 3A.11-5: lmplernent Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-Generated Stationary Sources ln addition to the mitigation measures in the FPASP EIR/EIS (listed above), the site-specific noise assessrnent provided the following refinements to the mitigation program that would be required for the project (Bollard Acoustic Consultants 2019). These refinements are consistent with the mitigation program outlined in the FPASP EIR/E15. > Mitigation Measure 4.13-1 Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures > Mitigation Measure 4.13-2 lnterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures The potential environmental impacts related to noise and vibration associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15'162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequenVsupplemental environmental analysis.

Pooulatlon and Housine
Consistent with the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community, the project would replace traditional homes with active adult age-restricted homes and the population within the project site would be reduced from what was identified in the approved FPASP. The project would further reduce the number of residential units within the project site. As such, population growth would be less than was previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and ,Addendum. The project would not displace existing people or housing. No mitigation measures were needed for the certified FPASP EIR/EIS regarding population and housing. No additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

The potential environmental impacts related to population and housing and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmenta I analysis.

Public Services
lmplementation of the project would not increase the demand for police protection, recreation, or other public services or facilities beyond that anticipated in the FPASP EIR/EIS. The project would not substantially change development densities from that approved in the FPASP and would not result in a larger service area than was previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project was approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A.14-1: Prepare and lmplement a Construction Traffic Control Plan > Mitigation Measure 3A.14-2: lncorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval
> Mitigation Measure 3A,14-3: lncorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs The potential environmental impacts related to public services and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequenVsupplemental environmental analysis.

AsctNl

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

Recreation
lmplementation of the project would include development of a residential subdivision along with a '1.2-acre private recreation park and 0.5-acre dog park. The previous approval of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community included a land use designation change of 10 acres of park to residential land, The 10-acre park site, known as FPASP NP5, was relocated outside of the Toll Brothers site to the Alder Ranch sub-plan area and Town Center sub-plan area. However, the parkland would remain within the FPASP area, the overall parkland space in the FPASP area would not be reduced, and the total FPASP area would continue to meet the City's parkland standard.

The project would not result in any further changes to parks within the FPASP. The FPASP EIR/EIS concluded that the impact to existing parks and facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation was required. The proposed pr ject would not change this conclusion.

The potential environmental impads related to recreational facilities and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequenflsupplemental environmental analysis.

Transoortation
Senate Bll743, passed in 2013, required the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to develop new CEQA Guidelines that address traffic metrics under CEQA. As stated in the legislation (and Section 21099[b][2] of CEQA), upon adoption of the new CEQA guidelines, "automobile delay, as described solely by LOS or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment pursuant to this division, except in locations specifically identified in the CEQA guidelines, if any." The Office of Administrative Law approved the updated CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 201& and the changes are reflected in new CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.3). State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 was added December 28, 2018, to address the determination of significance for transportation impacts. Pursuant to the new CEQA Guidelines, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) will replace congestion as the metric for determining transportation impacts.

The CEQA Guidelines state that "lead agencies may elect to be governed by these provisions of this section immediately. Beginning luly 1,2020, the provisions of this section shall apply statewide." As described above, the updated CEQA Guidelines were not adopted until December 28,2018, and as stated in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c), beginning on July 1,202A, the provisions of this section shall apply statewide.

Thus, local agencies had an opt-in period until July 1,2020, to implement the updated guidelines after they were formally adopted. Thus, the effective date of the changes to the CEQA Guidelines occurred subsequent to certification of the FPASP EIR/EIS in June 2011 and subsequent to the certification of the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum in March 2020. Section 15007 of the CEQA Guidelines addresses amendments to the CEQA Guidelines and states: "lf a document meets the content requirements in effect when the document is sent out for public review, the document shall not need to be revised to conform to any new content requirements in Guideline amendments taking effect before the document is finally approved" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15007[c]). Stated another way, because the EIR was circulated for public review (and completed) before this change in the CEQA Guidelines, the new provisions regarding VMT do not apply to this project. Therefore, the shift from automobile delay to VMT as the primary metric used to analyze transportation impacts under CEQA, as dictated by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, does not constitute "new information" as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and, even if it was "new information," CEQA Guidelines Section 15007 directs that the document "shall not need to be revised" to reflect this information. lmplementation of the project would involve development of an active adult residential subdivision. The project would be in the same area, would not change circulation patterns, and would result in 92 less dwelling units than previously analyzed in lhe Regency at Folsom Ranch Draft Transportatlon lmpact Study (T. Kear 2019). Thus, the project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe transportation impacts. The following ASCENT

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved.
> Mitigation Measure 34.14-1: Prepare and lmplement a Construction Traffic Control Plan > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road lntersection (lntersection 1) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements at the Sibley StreeVBlue Ravirre Road lntersection (lntersectiorr 2) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1c The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Scott Road (West)Affhite Rock Road lntersection (lntersection 28)
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1e: Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway I ntersection (lntersection 41)
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1f: Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Middle Road I ntersection (lntersection 44)
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1h: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard lntersection (Sacramento County lntersection 2) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1i: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Grant Line RoadAVhite Rock Road lntersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County lntersection 3) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1j: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-11: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way lntersection (El Dorado County lntersection 3) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1o: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound US 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/US 50 Eastbound Ramps lntersection (Caltrans lntersection 4)
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1p: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16 lntersection (Caltrans lntersection 12) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1q: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1r: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1s: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4) > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-1u: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1v; Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1w: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4) ASCENT

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September $ 2021

> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1x Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1y: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-12: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8) > Mitigation Measure 1A.15-1aa: Participate in Fair Share Furrding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts orr U.5. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1dd: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.5. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1ee: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1ff Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1gg: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15{hh: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1ii: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Hazel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-2a: Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Options for Alternative fransportation Modes > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-2b: Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-2c Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-3: Pay Full Cost of ldentified lmprovements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Sibley Streef,/Blue Ravine Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 2) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street lntersection (Folsom lntersection 6) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4c: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the East Bidwell StreeVNesmith Court lntersection (Folsom lntersection 7) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4d: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/lron Point Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 21) > Mitigation Measure 3A,15-4e: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Serpa Way/ lron Point Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 23) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4f: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Empire Ranch Road / lron Point Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 24) AsCENT

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-49:The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway / Easton Valley Parkway lntersection (Folsom lntersection 33) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4i: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road lntersection (Sacramento County lntersection 3) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4j: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7) > Mitigation Measure 3A,15-4k: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Grant Line Road beween Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8) > Mitigation Measure 34.15-41: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on HazelAvenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segment s 12-13) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4m: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4n: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4o: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the White Rock Road / Carson Crossing Road lntersection (El Dorado County 1) > Mitigation Measure 3A,15-4p: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps lntersection (Caltrans lntersection 1) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4q: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4r: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4s: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4t Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4u: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4v: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7) > Mitigation Measure 3A,15-4w: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4x: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4y: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35) ln addition to the mitigation measures in the FPASP EIR/EIS (listed above), the project-specific traffic study provided the following refinements to the mitigation program that would be required for the project (T. Kear 2019). These refinements are consistent with the mitigation program outlined in the FPASP EIR/E15. @

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

> Mitigation Measure 4.17-'1: East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6) > Mitigation Measure 4.17-2: East Bidwell StreetAilhite Rock Road > Mitigation Measure 4.'17-3: East Bidwell StreeVMangini Parkway > Mitigation Measure 4.17-4: East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway > Mitigation Measure 4.17-5: East Bidwell StreeVAlder Creek Parkway > Mitigation Measure 4.17-6: White Rock Road/Oak Avenue parkway The potential environmental impacts related to transportation/traffic and associated with implementation of the project are consistent with the conclusions of the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Tribal Cultural Resources
Assembly Bill (AB) 52, signed by the California governor in September of 2014, establishes a new class of resources under CEQA: "tribal cultural resources." lt requires that lead agencies undertaking CEQA review must, upon written request of a California Native American tribe, begin consultation after the lead agency determines that the application for the project is complete, before a notice of preparation (NOP) of an EIR or notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is issued. AB 52 also requires revision to CEeA Appendix G, the environmental checklist. This revision has created a new category for tribal cultural resources OCRs).

An addendum to a previously certified EIR was prepared for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. An addendum was determined to be the most appropriate document because none of the conditions described in Section 15162, calling for preparation of a subsequent ElR, occurred. The addendum addresses minor technical changes or additions and confirms that the project is consistent with what was previously analyzed under the certified ElR. As such, the addendum did not result in an additional certification; therefore, the AB 52 procedures specified in PRC Sections 21080.3. 1(d) and 21090.3.2 did not apply and no tribal consultation under AB 52 was required. Further, because the project is adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, this analysis is also not required to address TCRS. Mitigation measures discussed above under Cultural Resources that would reduce impacts to previously unknown cultural resources would also reduce potential impacts to TCRs should they be present.

The potential environmental impacts related to TCRs and associated with implementation of the project are consistent with the conclusions of the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15152 ol the State CEeA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenruise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Utitities and Service Svstems
lmplementation of the project would result in 92 fewer residential units than previously evaluated and would not result in substantial changes in development type or intensity. Thus, the project would not result in increased demand for water, wastewater, electricity, or natural gas beyond that anticipated in the FPASP EIR/EIS and Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum. Sanitary sewer, domestic water, and storm drainage services would be provided by the City of Folsom. Electricity would be provided by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, gas would be provided by Pacific Gas & Electric, telephone would be provided by AT&T, and cable would be provided by Comcast. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved.

ASCENI

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

> Mitigation Measure 3A.16-1: Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and lmplement On' and Off-Site lnfrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing ls Secured. > Mitigation Measure 3A.16-3: Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity. > Mitigation Measure 3A.18-1: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. > Mitigation Measure 3A,18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and lmplement Off-Site lnfrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing ls Secured. > Mitigation Measure 3A.18-2b: Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected).

The potential environmental impacts related to utilities and service systems and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ftS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEqA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenrrrise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis,
Witdfire
lmplementation of the project would involve the development of a residential subdivision within the approved Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Planned Community. The project would affect the same area already analyzed and would not substantially alter the development type or density at the site. The site is identified as a moderate fire hazard severity zone and is not near an area of high or very high fire hazard severity, as identified by CAL FIRE. The project would comply with Wildland-Urban lnterface building code regulations, California Fire Codg Folsom 2035 General Plan Polices and FPASP Polices. The project would not result in an increase in slope or prevailing wind that may exacerbate wildfire risks. There were no mitigation measures included in the FPASP EIR/E|S for this topic and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

The potential environmental impacts related to wildfire and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers EnvironmentalChecklist and Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required, Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEeA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Conctusion
Based on the analysis presented above, implementation of the project is adequately addressed by the FPASp EIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers Environmental Checklist and Addendum, and no new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the project. As a result, no new environmental document is required, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(b).

REFERENCES
Bollard Acoustic Consultants. 2019 (November 24). Environmental Norse Assess ment Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Residential Development. Folsom, CA,
City of Folsom. 2010 (June). Draft Environmentol lmpact Report/Droft Environmentol tmpact Statement Folsom South of U.S. 50 Spectfic Plan Project. SCH #2008092051. Sacramento County, CA. Prepared by AECOM and RMC Water and Environment.
@

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Erothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Memo
September 9, 2021

2011 (May). Final Environmental lmpact ReporVDraft Environmental lmpact Statement Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan Project. SCH #2008092051. Sacramento Counfi CA. Prepared by AECOM and RMC Water and Environment.
2020 (February). Toll Brothen at Folsom Ronch Master Planned Community Environmental Checklist and Addendum. Folsom, CA. Prepared by Ascent Environmental, ECORP. See ECORP Consuhing, lnc,
ECORP Consulting, lnc. 2019a (July 19). Biologicol Resources Technical Memorandulr Regency ut Folsom Ronch Praject Spectfic Plan Amendmenf. Prepared for City of Folsom Community Development Department. Rocklin, CA. --. 2019b (July 30). Cultural Resources Assessment to Support Amendments to the Folsom PIan Area Specific Plan and City of Folsom General PIan for the Regency at Folsom Ranch Project. RockliO CA. -
2020 (January 27). Arborist Survey Repoft and Mitigation Strotegy Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Project.

Prepared for Toll Brothert lnc. Sacramento County, CA.

T. Kear. See T. Kear Transportation Planning & Management lnc.

T. Kear Transportation Planning & Management lnc. 2019 (August 5). Droft Regency at Fokom Ronch Tronsportotion lmpad Study. Folsom, CA. Prepared for City of Folsom and Ascent Environmental, lnc.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program @

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment 17
Site Photographs

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

01/11/2022 Item No.13.
ti

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Toll Brothers at Folsom
Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision
Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision
Map and Minor Administrative
Modification for Development of 329-Unit
Active Adult Community

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Vicinity Map

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Project Background
• March 10, 2020: City Council Approval of a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Development Agreement Amendments, Planned Development Permit, and Inclusionary Housing Plan for Development of 1,225-Unit Active Adult and Traditional Single-Family Residential Subdivision
• October 7, 2020: Planning Commission Approval of Design Review Application for Development of 18,600-Square-Foot Clubhouse Building and Associated Recreational Amenities

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Key Project Details
• Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision
• 329-Unit Residential Development on 64.7-Acre Site
• Age-Restricted Units
• Detached and Attached Single-Story Homes (Design Previously Approved) • Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
• Create 348 Total Lots
• 329 Residential Lots
• 14 Landscape Lots
• 3 Open Space Lots
• 1 Dog Park Lot
• 1 Private Recreational Lot
• Private Recreational Amenities
• Private Gated Community with Private Streets
• Project Access (East Bidwell Street and Mangini Parkway) • Minor Administrative Modification
• Transfer 92 Allocated Dwelling Units to Other Locations in Folsom Plan Area

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Project Analysis
• General Plan and Zoning Consistency
• Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
• Traffic/Access/Circulation
• Parking
• Noise Impacts
• Walls/Fencing
• Measure W and Open Space
• Private Park Amenities
• Oak Tree Preservation and Removal
• Inclusionary Housing Plan
• Minor Administrative Modification

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Master Plan Exhibit

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Tentative Subdivision Map
Small-Lot Subdivision Map
• 329 Single-Family Residential Lots (Phase 2)
• Lots Range from 3,456 to 12,550 S.F. in Size
• All Lots Meet Minimum Requirements for
Size/Shape
• All Private Streets within Subdivision
• Private Recreational AmenitiesPage 423
01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Traffic/Access/Circulation
Traffic/Access/Circulation
• Transportation Impact Analysis
• 6,718 Daily Vehicle Trips
• 439 AM Peak Hour Trips/557 PM Peak Hour Trips
• No New Significant Impacts

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Wall and Fencing Exhibit

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Measure W Open Space
Measure W Open Space
• Existing: 83.9-Acres
• Approved: 86.1-Acres
• Increase of 2.2-AcresPage 426
01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Private Park Amenities

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Project-Specific Oak Tree
Preservation and Removal Plan
• 27 Total Oak Trees
• 14 Trees to be Removed Due to Excessive Cut-Fill Conditions (Purple Color) • 8 Trees to be Removed Due to Poor Health and Structure (Pink Color) • 5 Oak Trees to be Preserved (Green Color)

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Oak Trees to be Preserved

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Minor Administrative
Modification

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Environmental Review
• An Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS was previously adopted by the City Council on March 10, 2020 for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
• Environmental Memorandum Prepared for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision Project Demonstrates that No New or Substantially more Adverse Impacts Would Occur Through
Implementation of the Proposed Project.

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Planning Commission
Meeting
• Commission Evaluated Project at its December 1, 2021 Meeting • No Members of the Public Spoke at the Meeting
• Commission Focused on Number of Topics Including:
• Use of Drought Tolerant Landscaping (Including Grass Groundcover) • Private Park Amenities and Use
• Tree Preservation
• Transfer of Allocated Dwelling Units (MAM)
• Commission V oted to Recommend Approval of Project (6-1-0-0)

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Staff Recommendation
Staff Forwards Planning Commission
Recommendation to City Council for
Approval of the Toll Brothers at Folsom
Ranch Phase 2 Small-Lot Vesting Tentative
Subdivision Map and Minor Administrative
Modification

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

This page is intentionally left blank.

01/11/2022 Item No.13.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the third of five public hearings to: (1) receive community input on draft district map boundaries submitted by the public and the City's demographic consultant, (2) select two to four "focus" maps for consideration and refinement, (3) direct staff to make any desired map revisions, and (4) provide direction for the next public hearing scheduled for February 8,2022.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On July 27,202I, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to transition from at- large to by-district elections. This is the third of five required public hearings to start the transition process.

POLICY / RULE
Califomia Government Code Section 34886 authorizes the legislative body of a city to adopt an ordinance that requires the members of the legislative body to be elected "by district".

The change must be made in furtherance of the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act.

ANALYSIS
The process to transition to by-district election requires five public hearings where the community is invited to provide input regarding the composition of future City Council 1 MEETING DATE: Urr/2022
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Public Hearing No. 3 Under the California Voting Rights Act Regarding the Composition of the City's Voting Districts Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010
F'ROM: City Attorney's Office

01/11/2022 Item No.14.
districts. Pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010, the first two public hearings to inform the public about the districting process (held on September 14 and October 12, 2021) are required before any map of district boundaries for the proposed voting districts can be drawn. At this third public hearing, the City Council is requested to review draft district maps, receive public input and comment on the draft maps, and to identifu two to four 'ofocus" maps for further discussion, refinement, and public review in subsequent public hearings. The City Council will identiff a preferred map atthe fourth public hearing.

At the fifth public hearing, the City Council will adopt a district map and introduce an Ordinance to complete the transition process. The City Council is the final decision-making body on adopting district boundaries.

The City has scheduled the required public hearings as follows:

Date Meeting Type Public
Hearing
Item Topic at Meeting
9lt4l202r Public Hearing I Completed. Public input on
composition of districts (before
maps are drawn, hold 2 public
hearings on composition of
districts over period of no more
than 30 days)
tult2l202r Public Hearing 2 Completed. Continue to receive public input on composition of
districts (must be held within 30
days of Public Hearing No. 1)
UrU2022 Public Hearing 3 Discussion of proposed district maps. First draft of map must be
published 7 days before Public
Hearing No. 3
21812022 Public Hearing 4 Public input and identiff
preferred District
Map (hold 2 public hearings
within 45 days of Public Hearing
No. 3). Discuss sequence of
elections
212212022 Public Hearing J Adoption of District Map,
transition to district elections
Ordinance introduced
31812022 Regular Meeting Second reading of Ordinance
(effective 30 days after)
2

01/11/2022 Item No.14.

Cities must comply with the following legally required criteria under federal and state law:

1. Each district must have substantially equal population as determined by the census.

2. Race cannot be the predominant factor or criteria when drawing districts.

3. Council districts shall not be adopted for the purpose of favoring or disuiminating against a political party.

4. Incarcerated persons may not be counted toward a city's population, except if their last known place of residence is assigned to a census block in the city.

5. The districting plan must comply with the Federal Voting Rights Act, which prohibits districts from diluting minority voting rights and encourages a majority-minority district if the minority group is sufficiently large and such a district can be drawn without race being the predominant factor.

6. The City Council shall adopt district boundaries using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority:

A. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be geographically contiguous.

Areas that meet only at the points of adjoining comers are not contiguous. Areas that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge, tunnel, or regular ferry service are not contiguous.

B. To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A oocommunity of interest" is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation (e.g., school district boundaries, neighborhood boundaries, homeowners' associations, retail/commercial districts, etc.).

Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.

C. Council district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city.

D. To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, council districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.

To increase public awareness of the transition to district elections, the City has activated a variety of public communication channels to engage the Folsom community. Districting information is featured on the City's website and City newsletters. Numerous frequently J Page 437
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
asked questions have been posted on the dedicated districting webpages on the City's website.

Members of the public were encouraged to submit draft maps by January 3,2022 by either drawing on a paper map or through an electronic mapping software that automatically calculates district population numbers based on entries into the software. The submitted maps are included in the attachment for Council consideration.

The next public hearing to receive and consider further input from the public is scheduled for February 8,2022. At that meeting, the public will have an opportunity to comment on focus maps selected by the City Council, and the City Council will have an opportunity to identiff a preferred map. The public is encouraged to provide input via emails to [email protected]. Input may also be dropped off at City Hall.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The services of a demographer are required to assist the City transition to a by-district election system under specific aggressive timelines as required by the California Elections Code. Staff anticipates the cost to be approximately $40,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines $15061(c)(3)), or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by Public Resources Code $21065 and CEQA Guidelines $15060(c)(3) and $15378. The Council's decision regarding by-district elections meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No environmental review is required.

ATTACHMENT

1. Draft district maps submitted for Council review and consideration.

Respectfully submitted,
Steven W*g, City Attorney
4 Page 438
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

ATTACHMENTS
5 Page 439
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
lll03l2I R. Chance
5l Il.,.rdD Hrrll
6 Page 440
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

IIl05l2I R. Bulaga
H
ctTY ot
li'() l, s () l I
glgtrla,: Vt O. ltatuat
By-District Elections
?",?,3,?,!,,,11!,: P.,,D
rauul ng Kit
trse lhr\ m,lr) lo oullin. the lrvc drrlf r(ts you frct would besr ,cpro(ent elrh arol'spopl,l{tlion. lht rtuntUer in ('d(h oulllnod nrca tndicrtes the loldl popul.rtion of lhdl"gopulation u,til " Ia(h drslatct murl bc i3 (lor? a\ l)us5tl,lo io the same poprrtatron.wlth no more thrn r r.50o.per!o^ drlfrr*nce bctwcin thc lr.g?ri and rmalltrtdlslrr(ts, rl oerte(ily drvlrlccl. c.'rh dirrrl(r lh lolsom woulo hiie 15.00g peopie __'. Yo,,' Ir ; ;-]/ttl.ri[ ,,hnnr rl ,*hrj
T'
2tt0
rSta
t0a
201t
_ttaa
1t
An lJlllrrlt Vcr!r(ln Of ilU., rrr,rlr rvilfr
rl,:ttt' rl{",1r' ,,; .r!ill.rl!lr nl
www. lol r o nr. < o, vt I d rtt t t ( t c le ( I t o a t I ar' I t hrf L. :l,ir i. ',.r, or f d trrr) I ! (lt.);! y(),I ll Jr)
lirCF ,j'! O! nl.l!l )altir ( {,llrtrlr :r.:l ,rr,rl,
lo ltrt l-.>i,:rrt, ( it? .Artr)r0f!'r , tltrir',
lf totr'(.1'/ itJll,rr(j \dlr)t,,.! \trIr.l ,'r
.'.' ril t{' [email protected]<
/III
a
24' T
t
J
{
I
T
c
tt
€
a
I
II
!tt6
,\t
1 tt
nJI
L"'
rte.
rt2'
I
r'4r tr
rn0
t.,285
!
I
Ett
?
2r
a
t
7 I
a
I
a
a
a
a
j.-'
t3at
tlto
t7t
a
I
rnr t
,l
a
II
l,
a-.\
7 ;'.4;;
rt2r
t/alt
7t0
tal
tralll
nt
7Cl
zEr',6
i tz*
22''
1702
(!r
I
ttta
utoltu
rcta
t07t

16.3C

01/11/2022 Item No.14.
lll05l2l R. Bulaga
t-t tltbrfFfr.lrd t&dtot,Ldod, 15,0(B
Itld 2d Dl.ddf3Dfc hdFb. fi

8.ad*l|r
s{boh.r'r Ceoff .boiil ll. phc
&.r:O" lvrr rPr ! trA, r$r_ r.t..
aLtn ti o r tb offi {tdr ' lJil {:ltt, 42S
6tt
sort
h
tfi
tti i trilr t.tr:' sl
ert2t : ,qtz', 6A, | 7t{p
td I;!3irDtL rxlts llr!
q_.
0 o
o
.:lr.!(r7t
ln
**t# 6!tt
l% tir
x16il$inr . trlr aar
r'|_t1:$
B r* 14
totr!*
l*
run rflr I w rJ. vp
iu ; iii l"ii' ir- rr.16 !t j at rq;lJ':
o
0 !plttl
6 r!r* fr,7ft
ri!
N€.2@
r.F;l|.rr:t&t.vt lw6l ?19 r 6?a I ail c19
#.-*.i.'t: s.il'::
qE
ll!!llaag
ilt
al..
*
?x6t
os
t#
I
i!r.tx {rt'{
8 Page 442
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
lll08l2l J. Efros
tlcighls
El thaadoHllls
9 Page 443
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
llll5l2l B. Leary
10 Page 444
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
lIl29l2l C Gorton
ll!iqhlr,
€t Dorrdo Hitts
ll Page 445
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

I2ll3l2l A. Harrison
W lr() L tt ()-\f 8y-District Elections
1",1"?,::,,lllt P""P r a w i n g K i t
Cr!y Of
orttrxcttvf oY Iaruir
'lart r,tntc Atl Fl^..i.

Ar onlinc va.r3ion of tfrrr map rvittr
mOle detail tS J\,,tir,'tble at
www.lolt o m. c o. ut I di tt.i ctet c c t b n s.
irs..t ,hi(k, ft.trk.colore(, orlr l(r ilr.lw
lout t.tJp.
()rop oI or nt.!rl yoarr cornltlr:lecl nlnp
lo th? l.ollorr ( tty Attor npy'r Oltfir r,.
, cli5(rr' (.ity lt,tll. 50 N.ltorrr,r Strce( o!
ern.'|l lfr a,?ydePtg!olto m.ao. us
Yor.t f rrt;,1 Jnu/o: tlhone Irtrnbrr
vo qlo
...: it t. r:) i-Alrt'rr, tlrt..r,t,r,1
N, r . ...1 l'!:r., a t: li., ,a. .,,tj I
Usc thr: maP to outline tha trvo diitilctr you fcel woutd bost rep?ercnl Cl(h area,rpopuldtlon. Tha number in cd(h outlined alea rndic.ter thc totlr popurdlron oa rhrr''popul.rron unlt.. tdrh drstri(t mutr bc ar <lore d, posstble ro ifr[ii.i'poputdlon,with no more than I l.500.pcr ron differenra bcrwccn ttre largesl and ,rnirrlrrdisrrtcls. rt p.rtc(rly rrrvided, oach d*trrtt rn rorior wor,ro trii is.oori p."pr.. .I3
-rr
-
-Itt
-
IO

4..,,....^"
"l;Ht-
fi
'ulil'.'
N D
2 ia.?.

E
lE"ilr
tI
Arorea
t-,1
2 tr
0 I2 Page 446
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2ll3l2l A. Harrison
7A,l ,t a porQol, taltict,*.ntlt ^of s( raat6t*tzc! J't/ri'g ' Otl {olton atcq (nd '"'t-l^1"||'ilt;i) u'a
'
lalaqa a; a slott
poiat. //; fiv" of,tfr,it, or i>oTulatin
anirtl' Qtrc' r32t' 77qr3sq'
'rr',;S'Zr'^ o'sg^"o( o J'fto'^, a(t1frrct ' 7.'h" ':.t' ( /h"'l das rano/an// )"'7n"!' fo'h rqac*rtf<tlitt- lhcrc/u^z'
hat rcslatabrl'i {o' "n
-
€rtua ( a'c" a{ t''(u)er C"lto-' on'(
o//e r {o /so,n.
[5," {t1
Sharcel
re sp^oi6,ll'
*i igo' (
{l rttTorihlt
rl {alra,n
\lclhcr
Sf,& ilotr:
--__.
|op't"t",n;S /69f a,! tn5.hnt.

Hr*u.. l0i5 pcopb"/,;;, otnrrt
Q2 TcoVc be,, al llv ?r,irn ?
fC) f aili* a'2. cA'hh.n,
iry *vs ,,.
13 Page 447
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
12/22121 M. Johnson
14 Page 448
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2l28l2l C. Kempenaar
I i l)ir, ir. li ,r.
15 Page 449
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

I2l28l2I B. Cline
Il,r!l l,l !
Ll0u.alo llJlt!
t6 Page 450
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2l28l2| B. Cline
Olstrlct Conflguratlon ln Folsom
Guiding principles - By Eruce Cline
Contlnulty of Communltles of Interest
- Mlnlmlze Spllts of NaturalCommunltles where posslble
- Example - - Hlstorlc Dlstrlct, North of the Rlver, Central Buslness Malntaln North of the Rlver, Hlstorlc Dlstrlct, Central Buslness Dlstrlct as a whole lf posslblq but can comblne wlth other areas
Dlstrlct llnes based on Maln Streets or Slgnlllcant Communlty Features where posslble - Create easy to follow Dlstrlct Llne where posslble
- Example Rlver, Corrldors, Maln Thoroughfares
Communltles Together
- North of the Rlver
- Hlstorlc Dlstrlct
- Central Buslness and Central Resldentlal
- Brlggs Ranch
- Lexlnglon Hllls
- Pralrle Oaks
- Emplre Ranch
- Folsom South of 50
Allocate towest Populatlon numbers South of 50 allowable to reflect populatlon lncreases slnce Census and Expected Growth ln Near Term (whlle respectlng communlty and natural boundarles)
- 1723 Resldentlal Bulldlng Permlts lssued whlch results ln Populatlon of 49116 (2.9/DUl in t{ext 6 months {Presently roughly 980 unlts are occupled (2.9/DUl = 2842 resldents)
- 27OO mapped lots - Represents another 7830 resldents llkely by 2025 - Dave's Dlstrlctlng Map allocates 905 to South of 50
- South of 50 populatlon ln Very Short Term = 49@ t{OT Rellected on maps in very neerterm
- Examlne Dlverse Populatlon and Polltlcal Partles for each Dlstrlct NOTE- The one change I would llke to make ls to lnclude Porter Street all ln the Dlstrlct that encomparses South of 50. The program would not let me lnclude lt as lts own Block.

I7 Page 451
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2l28l2l R. Goss
tl.rlqhl\
El Oorido Hiilt
18 Page 452
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2l29l2l C. Davis
lli,'., 1.i1
t9 Page 453
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
0ll0ll22 M. Dooley
il?*
'',ri4$'
"1:ti,j tII Clffiff Pet
'jlt
,I,::,
I
r':; 1""
.t
20 Page 454
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 L. Holderness
fk:rqhli
El oorn{,o l'lille
2l Page 455
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01102122 J. Alexander
t,
I
I
{t
t
' riuex '
22 Page 456
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
011021228. Leary
9l
4 23 Page 457
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01102122 B. Leary Notes
My notc* prcntourty afidtbd rnp wlddr l\r dchbrl - nclr mrp qldcd O1n1fZo/A.

I wu unabb b gd ttc ilocf! ptt d thc app b wort b dlrp thc nwnbcn. I b.flcvr Otc dhfild rrrhlcft hcldco S-60 lhodd bc lcft er hr h yfri ar pcrbb wUrfr thc gdd*rcr aa lt b Urc mc vrhlch wil ontgnin thc o0tcr rf&lctr.

I flcd b crffih &Ulctr r'd$ rtnlb egoa of hofiF.. Dhehi I omrblr of hqn lot ltofltcq lcr rrn*ubb F vlccr - thc tnac wiltlr tlsn era wd qrmcbd by ttc Fohm tlsn cluhg.

Tha flbbb Obfi.i lhould bc dgrEdu,lth thcrw tborrufit otscrhqncrer rlpur antha nnp. t&brm Sdonmd Pritlc OrklhntrHrrdsnogrdplcrrtd bdct roo6r b rndu.nd trSfc fltrfr, Fffiy rco 4 hctudo mct ol Op lran rbrdopcrt dtr Urc 90, &o wry trnbd b nnltablc rcrvls.
24 Page 458
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2l3ll2l T. Nordheim
NDC 9lr IPoprlrdonUnhlhn
25 Page 459
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
':- :.
.,.:, -,.!'1::--;!
i)1:.1:.j
--7..,.-
::'- a i,: ::
.i.t'.:.r
ztro
.c
N)o\

01/11/2022 Item No.14.

Sunr\Dirtrtc Arincd ldcdpo?uLtbnr
Pohcl 2lld Dirtrlcting Pub[c Penicipr*rn trit
Jrh-rb1?
tSJIB
-et:|i
Suhnincr'r Commnrr rbdrr rhc plrnr
,sr*rti. lab&r*-f6ldJ.*FfrdabrF.illdbhbrtirdraterhtn&a'(atqDtr+arFtllmtt& lnq Foar-'* c ba.r -d 6 dd d &d r**rf| di c *. rd t6fly ui b idc rll tbc.i.flad ib.aF b h.. rt-$iboarb*fttnC
f>Yblib fnfrld.
l\|!r.tdi6
tri#) ts,x7
fF?41
Itr61'|5,18 .I
zt" . Jt9
z\qr
t.{6t -{_atir :-:6% ottll
I
I
I
I p?-i
q{6:
l$
l.d7
er4
Dl
(xi6 \trtrT Iti+.

NU C&
Nil ar
|\! rr
?JS
t{{
6ls
t0rtF
it
tate
a lat
d.€l
197
BIJ
Tftf
Ji)
(tkr
Nrr. tr:o I 11161'
\ir.6 Aris.,\d.krh
o
o
reIrFF{r_-rId
Hffi
27 Page 461
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
l2l3ll2I T. Nordherm
'Iorrl
t.
lr
28 Page 462
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 R. Campbell
$_
! rr is Cc (ol r Crilr
|:,
a:
.:
* .'t'
'ri
€.

Il O0r.]do Hill5
L.,1 :
29 Page 463
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103/22 R. Campbell
My nolcc praUouUy rubmltbd mrg wtrlclr l\rc dclctcd - n€w mtp ctlatd O1nlfinZ2.

I wes unobb to gpt thc Blod(t p.n d thc app to wodt b t8mc thc nutr$c]s. I bcllc\rc thc drtrlclrruhlch frdudca g-CO thould bc lcfrrr low ln vobrr o poor&lcrrlthln thc gdddftca tc n b thc onc nrl$ctru,U ol&row lhc o|hcrtllttlctr.

I tlcd b ccilabblr dlrtlctr wlth rffiar q|ts ot hqnc8. Dirtlc{ 'l condrtr of brgc bf ltflH, lcar welcbb larvlcaa - thc atac wililn thcrn ap wtf, onnccbel by hc FobornDsnCrwfn.

Thc tfbbb Difld lhodd bcdlgncdwllttlhcmaabotflft 0ll.rhfficr er ttpwn on lhc mrp. l.Lbme Sb0m and Pr*lc Oatrhau !ffiardcrnogtefplcr md bctbr acccg lo !frrnoa end plbfc banrlt Flna$y ma 4 lncldca mct dlhc ar:n dcvdogcd lntrUn 90, abonuy lknH bwa[oUc !ctvl6.
30 Page 464
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 NDC Map 1
Folsom z0n,Disaictiog Mrp lrpu
;""';NDC l0l
NDC 101 Lodrr*fucr
VercrArcr
+ lsclbc/Pctrtir
-
IlrlLrdl
*_ nhct
Str'c.ar
Irndrnr*Pofot
31 Page 465
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

OIIO3I22 NDC MAP 1 TABLE
t0t
trI t!rt) ta tg noI
.u i! I l5 {, g
Cbr4d&.t*
It ttt tots 9S tm .t rr
t\
t?\ r0sr rlao lJx t.!r IJL
\ 5cn+i6m,
\bJ@
\t+G.!d
tsJ r rF aAt | lrr ts ap
\5a-dle
\&5!e
\[email protected]
G
h
tlu rD' tar6 atr txt J!l.a
\t-e.br-
r^bA.rd
\tFld
!t!tt !t ratrr ra E 7, jl
lry4Ga-iha
tE-.fEbbtrH
'.qb€+x.l
h
N th rh !l\ lh 3A
B
)h
ttu.4-' E b r- &e|r-'- i-4
,r.-|-. r- k--. .1 Itrg r4rF hitrt4L.H-a6-
{bt rt. U Pr $ .-rs .. r- a6rDr. lE tu ^-tItr hrr, (.rErr kt rd tr!- LI ir.{fr4
32 0l/O?/202f 2l Or

01/11/2022 Item No.14.

OIIO3I22 NDC MAP 2
Folsom 20?2 Disaicting
NDC 1O1A
Mrp lrycr
' NDC l0lA
Irrxlrnert Arce
" . \Yetct Am
+ Ittdbc/P<rrycrl.bc
.. .Rivtr
Srrcctc
Lm&nerl Point
{ 5
li
I
J
o^ o.f
-...';f
'
',i
alctr cla?ER
-r -) Page 467
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

OIIO3I22 NDC MAP 2 TABLE
NOC totA
I ! !
4 .t ) )t) n, tu
CF vri lc. ta
tlD tait t0 tu r{lJ rr at €ln
td! l$ a lra r0 tar tt It .a la(,
\tc-t-sffd
i&-.3le
\[email protected]
f,'.t axa r& rJs !o@r AN
\ gc-Fs.r.frt
\&5.3./d
\rFglltd
t!t r.aan
\tnr.!@
tAF3tM
\rr*.3rd
llq la rtr rt r+ r] tl
tfflabbqd
,qb-srt.r
ll
!F
l.q,r'-. tah.ta. rlrhrM a--
b-rF. tw.+.-r d tr\{ r.. l, F,&rn bdb-
rr. '- {-r&r.dit.r *.. a-4 er.i,$. tF. tte !.\-. -ts&r -r.,.r J*-! -tr*, d ui! 46 *-..r q rb! lwr v !* $ tdrs d r.- b.otlr. k n.t ti rr !.lJ I ^tu.r k'n.r lrrfllt&
34 0t$l/r0?2 2200 r.\i-l.jl

01/11/2022 Item No.14.

OIIO3I22 NDC MAP 3
2 I .'i
J
I
'5,,i
4 Folsom 2022 Disuicting Mrp lrycre
NDC 1O1B

NDC IOIB
Irndrlrl Altl'.' . l$etcrAn
---.o,- Ittpclbc/l,orcrl.bc
-
Rrilrc.d
- Rher
Strccc
I.lndma*?oinr
t,'
I
)
q
alo:r cAP€
35 Page 469
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

OT/03122 NDC MAP 3 TABLE
N(rc l0't8
tt !t !a
.ata al 5' tta JT ut
fr\
td tt rtt lo tB axt I rrt an
lls \Hq &. D*
t)a
\ lcsr-gdnr-t
ab.3ffia
tr$.!]ffi
to:lFt !h,s taa q)*
\rc-t.hd
\^!-!d
3t4fr.tuffi
aJtl tar aw, trr au
\tcF96rd
\&-lrlq
\t@ld
gsa6 !ru talt
r? Dt rt bt rl lrr iaB! ra !u rl ll
lrygS-th
b.6febhrbd
,tqtoxeI.l
ad d le At ta. nt ,.A at rt ac 6rt
n
fr
!\
lr-.e*. .-h- t.l!$arr,- !r-
a.-r,q v t+ + t ^r-, dr e- 3ry$i. rr n I. t4 :, he. gre.r br .i kdu*
36 O',rO212O22 225O I \). 1., ,

01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 J. Normington
l&c$rt E
E i:ii.t;ti,e^,t$ fliirtrUfifij"ril"*r ns Kr t
oudlnr trtr
nurn6rr h tcaltrult brtt
urft.. Etslr
no riota ttun a I
.tt
llaa lndlc.tll th.,ild tt 4ott lr
lGrd$&orpt milllnk
J-
n
.lctr
ctdr
vollt
t
An onllnc wrrlon of thtt mtp udth
horc alcadl b rwlli0lc rrllrv,folna,. co, ut tlht n 3q h q n e a Ura r thtcli lllrt{o$oiGd psn to drur
,sur map;
Orolollorncll your cornplrt.d mrp
to,thr fqltorn Gtry iq,orncl,.r Ofile.'f,olrorn (hy Hrlt. -90
ffXonio Srr.fi oramrlt r-o o ttyrltptifultom.st Jt t, C.+fri$ ru I f/tt tttt (upril,rb4 tldldtrl lbna OrlolFr I0. 8rf
37 Page 471
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 J. Normington
H Ir()Lt$(,Nt By-Distrlct Electlons
-Plpqr.Uap Drawlng Ktt?oguldon Cond Ctalwt lnct
Ylut
glf v o]
olrtttctrv3 ar raruat
U$ !o urdlnr tbr lhrnufik h ltctt
Erth-dttrht tnrnr brlln0rc IIt
dlttllctt
crci dbtrkt ln Rt sirll sould
Yqrrtarl arxtlor pi6a.
|la
bril napnltiltfidt.flt.t
of Urtt
(trtA.., ,O, r (Al'tr tfFftir,{arlottl lhfio of l*.r p. 'lt,|
,
.:.rf,
,
.i.
.ttI
.t
ti
,.
'{
\r.
$
An sn[nr vrlrloh ol thh ntp ryt0r
morc durll h 6vrlhbh dt
ffi ,Iolnm;n,vttl)g rtctra&rctlo n,
Ore a tftli& drrt.cotorfil p?n r{r drtrr
lour m.P,
oro-p oil or rDtlt yorrr com9htsd !rr9(o tha foborn CllyA$ornllft Olllco.- FolsDm ClW.Htlt lO lrronir Strcal orrnnll ro cn drt talelfr',,&,q r. t,'
t
I
tD |2
9w
t'll
l. t
.r-r
!1:.r
.i .'It
38 Page 472
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 S. Hudson
Thrnk you lor rnclud'n8 out votce
Shel;ey
Have a tafe day.
39 Page 473
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 R. Dresser
II
fI
t-
I
3 i!
, ','|:

I
I
;t
ir
ss:l ie
,'s-
'1 1l;
:

I
40 Page 474
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 E. MacDonald
i{ ii,rt.tlE.a',
&s'tlsnR' {;!cii!pi!!ttt
{.
i
It
,:1 ,
El Doiado Hitts u \;61'ntta
q
L
r,{
i,i .
t 1 -r',til'1. lrrrioii*otl*
.,1: , ,*.oF:'+ " '" "
,,, '
{l irr
;,
t
s
I,l*'blc
l'!er'lrl,.,
lr:ii tr" a r.r4 f,?
4t Page 475
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 D. Reid
H +;:HJiS.gIf 3t;?1ll'ffi';$''di""'i ns Kit
Unlt tD Soccd Ccntur Arcos
Use thls map to oulline the tive dlstrlcts you leel would best rcprcscnt cach lrea's population. The number ln cach outllncd rrc. lndlc.tcs Unlt lD of crch orca. Ula lhlt mrp along rvlth thr 'Prrtlclprtlon flt'Mlcrosott Ercol rprerdshoct that can be tound .t wvr,lol nm. co, utld It tilct. ltctlo n t.

Youl N.rrno: Your Gmrll and/or Phonr Numbcr
A
I
/t./
4 ....-fi]"'-"
-a.t"t'
-t'
C
I
Iri
tt
An onllnc vcrglon of thls map wlth
more detall is avallable at
vrrww, lols o m.co. ut ldl ta rl cae I ul lo n s,
Use a thlck, dark-colorcd pcn to dtaw
yotrr .natt.

Drop oll or mall your completed mop
lo lhe Folsom City Attorncy's Ofllcc.

Folsom Clty llall, 50 Netoma sircet or
rlrrall lrr o ltyt c pl9folsottt. c.r. ut.

I
it",r-*,
Grnphl(t )O) I CAI lptR CorporJtlo'L
Netlonol Oqmo Orlobcr )0, lO2'l
42 Page 476
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 D. Reid Notes
l{rmDen d th f*m Clty Gorrldl:

Ar tln (ftV ol Foboor dentopl ltr *ftUa Coutrtf Mrp I uuld ltr !o rdvotr bl llrr mliborto&thrt comprbr SotrotElEl 81ffi Slrr.t ud ilorfrol llftrnyso, rl.ll tlrhh b trrlSfcotnpfrO ol0r. ilrtontr SbUoo pnH. ftb, rnd Erordrtm mlhloftooOl lhlr rnr of Sn Oty ot Fdldn *r dotrlofd h th l!l$r. Ilnr ml3ltortoorb byr ior Ur. bd.. pert olthm drcrdo *lrd r r rlt|ll ornutty ol ltrrrt nn e{olnlq mtbbo.hodr.r.. rtoilhf dd|h e oounnty. rr.ry of who.n rrlt on dl.l hcorml lho drlf.'r h thb ornur{tf oat o d.'lhatln cilnbh..l n.urlofiooa fim llt.I $Ir tll. rrlr. rdpob, roldq oAntatotn' .nd tportr brr. ftur orttaodmdrbo rlren thr rnn dfc omruwhlch hnD.ct$r.b nrltsoatoO lLr. l31hmy50 loo9oltt, thr i.ft., fley$n t(btAnnr Pltnyf. fhy.bo tlutr h $. lffi bd oil rftrlrntdoo o tltr Fotoot Cly Gooct To tlr bat of my hdr{a m menbrr ott|lr fuor OtyGancl hr rr rrrldrd h llnr n{ffoapoa lhr rbcd oftr* frun nqtt d Ed SUrrf Slrlet hlu. dlin Ur lld. iotdtr nlljiaotlroodt ?o!r dor, I rn not ofrfr thrf h*hnh[ r I tr{rvr fi hrvr h.b.d io c'lf. rnrVt9rchl dtf.

An I mdd trrpctn& rrf b io? tlt. Cf,y Cotrtd b.tUrpt b frO $sr mlf$ctott b|rUt t rdr.r$ndvS.thraltlg.
gnc.dyyorrr
43 Page 477
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 A. Targos
\
n
gl 06.)dr Hrits
,2
I
7^
44

01/11/2022 Item No.14.
0U03122 L.
*'.
45 Page 479
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103/22 N. Ferrrari
H lr() l,s(Dlt ct Electlons
Ma p Drawing
Ataot
i '.' \.. !r
8y-Dlstrl
Paper Kit
Poguloa,on Eotad C.ntut
[i1r lh,1 m.!l] l() orrllrr\c thr f,y.. rlralrr( l! you lce I weuld bcrl f cp?cienl .l.h iif.l 1 l).)pillalr()r lhf rr(jorl!rr tri oi{ h oul,r.!rr, tlrn !nr'rr{ dll\ lh? lolal f)opulollolr of lhJl 'ftonrilr?,nn ,rnll ' I nf h d,(lrr(l mi,ll io ;|1 (loic J\ pollrblr lo lhr' \dttlr tropillalrorr wrih no nlof r rhrn n I \ilil pr'r\()n dtlfelentt brlwrett tht ldrEcll tn(t ltnalletl h.v" l',.O0ll pe oplr
nicAF 3t3@
{tr\tti(t1 I'pfrlcrllt drvr(tr.t. ('n(h (llrtrt(I rtl I{tllonr would , Aj,'<h E'yr) ' ,. ,l 'i.i,r,r, ^.'
I . ed4
@ !^:;:;:;fr'Ti,,,-: t3.1o5
6 &n1..1 fZlson
.l1,qcl
o frorrrl 6. h /
N.7o-q Sh I
' ti qcc
BraJs'l"e
. lst 466
lstnlrt o
Pr"lI; IS,LZ Z
t " .. . ' t 1r, ,,t t i't1'. /' rit Ali'\
',,, ( t\1.1,r ,1J,.1,.-tl,'.'.r!
au* !ottom (o ultd!llttl aala( Itont
,,,r.,{ lr,r .l.t'r,,,.,'11,,,1,,r'!t
iir,rlr ,.if ,r 'rt.1 t-r,,. , '' l,l. !rd trrtlt,
I I ?hf 1,,'',,ir'. f :t, All;i"rt i '' !rti '.'
r i. 1,iryi i tlr t!t I tta li.rt',:',.t 'rl'r'rl r,r
en.-r rr! otlldaPllDloltom <o ur
rDa
t3r2tlr
,otl
0 l/alta
o
tt
rl{
,ra
!t! llo
LaO
rlat
rtt
r.l1
mh
rtat
2L
lla
rraa
ttail
I
lll
toi
tt Itl
tlal
rg tlr I
rl.t
rtoy''.
taao
taatg
ltti
tr
laat
tna
I
t
I
r,jr
tr
46 Page 480
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 L &E Bonzell
I
I
t
I
47 Page 481
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
0l/03122 L. Ferrari
f F'Or,SOilr
Grlt ot
orattrcttvt av tiltgtf
Ydr taltie:

Ar onllnr varrlon of thli mrp wlth
mor. dcl.ll h.YrlhbL.ttrs. folmar.cc. s lllttd ct t h c tlo u.

Uta a lhl(t datl.(oto,ad pan lo dtaw
your map.

Orop olt or mall yaut compl.tcd
'n
p
to th. fobom CllyAnotnaYr Otllcc,
Folrom Clrt Hrll. 3O llrlom.r Sttrat ot
.rn ll lo rflId.pllcfi,o',"3'"6.

Bv-Dlstrlct Elcctlong
Faiei il-p Drawlng Klt
Ffrtrdm ll'.rCr.lt'fttt
Yet|r tmt[ |'|rdrQr Plro|rl llrrabat!
a
?'l5r8.?o
3- 16,5+A
4- t+,l16
5-*,s28
l- t5,
({aa,lxr lolt (AAl$f I (sos*s*
r-
Itu
n
n
tll taat
48 Page 482
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 K. Kreutz
.)i''
:
49 Page 483
01/11/2022 Item No.14.
01103122 J. Wright
II
Ibt
50 Page 484
01/11/2022 Item No.14.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re
MEETING DATE: utt12022
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Appeal by Bob Delp, Folsom Railroad Block Developer, LLC, and the Historic Folsom Residents Association of Decisions by the Historic District Commission Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for the Barley Barn Tap House
project (PN 19-174) located at 608 YzSutter Street and
Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA
F'ROM: Community Development Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to deny the appeal by Bob Delp, Folsom Railroad Block Developer, LLC, and the Historic Folsom Residents Association of Decisions by the Historic District Commission Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for the Barley Bam Tap House project (PN 19-174) located at 608 YzSutter Street and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA.

BACKGROUND
The existing4,377-square-foot commercial building located at 608 YzSutIer Street, which was built in 1958, is constructed of vertical wood slats with sliding wood doors and a comrgated metal roof. The existing building is not considered a historically significant structure and does not include building materials that would be considered historically significant. In addition, the existing building is not listed on the City's Cultural Resource Inventory List. The existing commercial building is currently occupied by an art and crafts store (Artfully Rooted) that provides an eclectic mix of artistic d6cor, furniture, fashion, vintage, antiques, and repurposed items.

On September 22,2021, the applicant (Regina Konet) submitted a development application for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for development and operation of a 1

01/11/2022 Item No.15.
craft beer establishment (Barley Barn Tap House) within an existing 4,377-square-foot building located at 608 % Sutter Street. The proposed interior layout of Barley Barn Tap House includes 2,433 square feet of floor area on the first level including a large central area with moveable tables and seating, abar area, a cooler room, and restroom facilities. The second floor of the building, which will be reduced from 1,944 square feet to 1,366 square feet, will be utilized for storage purposes only. The resulting total square footage of the building will be 3,799 square feet. Barley Barn Tap House will also include a fenced outdoor patio (approximately 480 square feet in size) which is located on the west side of the building. In tcrms of opcrational charactcristics, Barley Barn Top House has proposed serving craft beers and food, both of which will be provided by off-site local vendors. Live entertainment is proposed on a limited basis in the interior of the building. Proposed hours of operation are Sunday to Wednesday, 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and Thursday to Saturday, ll:00 a.m. to 12:30 a.m.

The Barley Barn Tap House project also included a request for Design Review approval for exterior and interior modifications to the existing building in order to create a rural vemacular which is reminiscent of the historic barns throughout California. The proposed building materials include vertical reclaimed wood siding, aluminum clad wood-framed windows, aluminum clad wood-framed glass entry doors, a pair of steel egress doors, galvanized metal gooseneck light fixtures, vintage signage painted on wood, faux dutch doors to emulate horse stables, and comrgated metal roofing. The color scheme is predominantly rustic brown in nature due to the extensive use of the reclaimed wood siding. The roofing material will be a reddish-gray tint to emulate an aged metal roof with an appealing patina. The doors and windows will be a dark brown color.

Vehicle access to the tsarley Bam Tap House site is provided by existing roadways including Sutter Street, Scott Street, and Riley Street, while pedestrian access to the site is facilitated by existing sidewalks 4nd pedestrian walkways. Parking to serve the Barley Barn Tap House project is proposed to be provided by utilizing existing public and private parking options in the immediate project area including the Powerhouse Pub parking lot(2I spaces), the adjacent Historic District Parking Lot (72 spaces), and the Folsom Electric Building parking garage (51 spaces). In addition, the applicant has entered into a lease agreement to utilize 15 parking spaces located within the nearby Eagles Lodge parking lot for exclusive use by Eagles Lodge members and customers and employees of Barley Barn Tap House.

The Historic District Commission reviewed the Barley Barn Tap House project at its November 18, 2021 meeting. At this meeting, twelve individuals (including residents, business owners, and community organizations) voiced concern regarding the proposed project, while three individuals (a resident, a business operator, and a community organization) spoke in favor of the proposed project. In addition, the City received numerous comment letters regarding the proposed project and a previous iteration of the project (Folsom Prison Brews). The majority of the comment letters were from individuals who expressed opposition 2 Page 486
01/11/2022 Item No.15.
to the proposed project, although there were also letters from individuals supporting the proposed project. All of the comment letters were provided to the Commissioners for their consideration (included as part of Attachment 4 to this staff report) at the November 18,2021 Historic District Commission meeting.

The individuals who were opposed to the proposed project voiced concern regarding a number of topics including the following:
o Bar/Brewery Use
o Building Design
o Concentration of Bars Along Sutter Street
o Hours of Operation
o Noise
o Parking and Off-site Parking Agreement
o Pedestrian Safety
o Traffic and Circulation
o Use of CEQA Exemption
The individuals who expressed support for the proposed project focused their comments on a number of issues including the following:
o Business Owner Character
o Craft Beer Business Model
o Historic Building Design
o Off-Site Parking Solution
r Positive Economic Impact
o Sutter Street Surfer Transportation Option
Following extensive public comment, the Historic District Commission engaged in a lengthy debate regarding the proposed project. The primary issues discussed by the Commission were related to potential parking impacts, potential noise impacts, and use of the CEQA Exemption for the project.

With respect to parking, the Commission discussed the existing parking conditions in the Historic District, the parking requirements of the proposed project, and the parking solutions provided by the project. In relation to existing parking conditions, the Commission expressed concern that addition of another bar-type use at this specific location could potentially exacerbate parking conditions in the Historic District. The Commission acknowledged that there are a number of parking solutions that have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented (wayfinding program, residential parking permit program, etc.) in the J Page 487
01/11/2022 Item No.15.

Historic District, but that the timing of other solutions (parking in-lie fee, parking structure, etc.) are more long term in nature and may not be pertinent to the proposed project at this time.

The Commission inquired about the parking requirements for the proposed project. In response, City staff commented that the Folsom Municipal Code GMC. Section 17.52.510) requires that all retail, office, restaurant, museum, and similar uses provide one parking spaces per 350 square feet of building space. However, City staff noted that City practice has been that projects involving existing buildings that do not result in an increase in density (increased building squore footage) such as extorior tenant improvoments, interior tenant improvements, and similar projects are not required to provide any additional on-site parking. Consistent with past City practice, staff determined that the proposed project, which includes interior and exterior tenant improvements (project results in reduction in building square footage from 4,377 square feet to 3,799 square feet) to an existing commercial building is not required to provide any on-site parking spaces. Staff noted to the Commission that if the proposed project were subject to the aforementioned parking requirements, 11 on-site parking spaces would have been required, which do not need to be on the project site.

The Commission also asked about the parking solutions being provided by the proposed project. City staff explained that existing nearby parking options anticipated to serve the proposed project include 2l parking spaces located within the adjacent Powerhouse Pub parking lot (under same private ownership as subject property),72 parking spaces located in the adjacent public Historic District Parking Lot, and 51 parking spaces located within the Folsom Electric Building parking garage. In addition to the existing parking options in the project vicinity, staff commented that the proposed project includes the provision of 15 shared off-site parking spaces (lease agreement) at the Folsom Eagles Lodge site, approximately 220 feet to the east of the subject parcel. Staff indicated that the lease agreement for the 15 off-site parking spaces is required to remain in effect as long as the Barley Barn Tap House or any other subsequent establishment operation at the subject location remains in business. Lastly, staff stated that the project applicant committed to offering a complimentary shuttle service (Sutter Surfer) to transfer customers to and from the Historic District parking structure and other public parking lots within the district and the project site.

The Commission discussed potential noise impacts associated with the proposed project in relation to nearby businesses and residential neighborhoods. City staff explained that anumber of conditions of approval were placed on the project to minimize potential noise impacts including limitation on hours of operation, prohibiting outdoor speakers, requiring door and windows to be closed during entertainment activities, and complying with the City's Noise Control Ordinance. City staff also commented that the proposed hours of operation associated with the proposed project are similar to other bar-type businesses located along Sutter Street.

Lastly, City staff stated the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed project can be revoked if it is determined that the project deviates from the Historic District Commission approval and is not in compliance with all conditions of approval.
4 Page 488
01/11/2022 Item No.15.

With regard to environmental review, the Commission asked for more clarification and details regarding the CEQA Exemption being used for the proposed project. City staff stated that the project was determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and that none of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines apply to the use of the categorical exemption(s) in this case. City staff proceeded to discuss some of the exceptions (location, cumulative impact, significant effect, and historical resources) in more detail with the Commission.

At the conclusion of the November 18, 2021 Historic District Commission meeting, the Commission was satisfied with the determination that the proposed project is exempt from CEQA and voted on two separate motions associated with the proposed project. First, the Commission adopted a motion (4-l-2-0) to approve a Conditional Use Permit for the Barley Barn Tap House project. Second, the Commission adopted a motion (5-0-2-0) to approve Design Review for the Barley Barn Tap House project.

POLICY / RULE
As set forth in Section 17.52.700 ofthe Folsom Municipal Code, actions of the Historic District Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The appeal shall be in writing, shall state the specific reason for the appeal and grounds asserted for relief, and shall be filed no later than 10 calendar days after the date of the action being appealed.

APPEALS/ANALYSIS
On Novemb er 24, 2021 , Bob Delp submitted a timely appeal of the decision of the Historic District Commission approving the proposed project. On December 3,2021, Folsom Railroad Block Developer, LLC and the Historic Folsom Residents Association submitted separate timely appeals as well. Each of the three appeals will be addressed separately below in this staff report.

A. APPEAL No. 1 - Bob Delp
As noted above, Bob Delp submitted a timely Notice of Appeal and associated background letters appealing the Historic District Commission's decision to approve the Barley Barn Tap House project (Attachment 1). Listed below are the ten reasons that Mr. Delp identified in his appeal letter for contesting the Historic District Commission's decision, and City staffs response to each item.

1. Information and analysis provided in the staff report to the HDC was insufficient for meaningful consideration of the Project's potential impacts and for the HDC to make a fully informed decision about the Project entitlements. 5 Page 489
01/11/2022 Item No.15.

City Staff Response:

City staff evaluated the Barley Barn Tap House project in accordance with requirements and recommendations established by the Folsom Municipal Code and the Historic District Design and Development Guidelines. Staff included all pertinent information regarding the proposed project in the Staff Report to the HDC and provided detailed analysis of the project's proposal and potential impacts under the requirements established by the Folsom Municipal Code:
o FMC Chapter 15.52; HD, Historic Distriot
o FMC Section 17.52.300, Design Review
o FMC Section 17.52.360, Conditional Use Permit Review
o FMC Section 17.52.660, Demolition
o FMC Chapter 17.57, Parking Requirements
r FMC Chapter 17.60, Use Permits
In particular, staff followed established practices in reviewing the proposed project with respect to parking requirements. All information and analysis provided to the HDC was sufficient for the Commission to make a dqcision about the project, and the Commission did, in fact, make a fully informed decision following a lengthy discussion and review ofthe proposed project.

2. Issues associated with the Project, including interpretation of certain provisions of the Folsom Municipal Code ("FMC"), have broad policy implications for future projects in the Historic District and warrant consideration by the City Council.

Citv Staff Response:

Staff is unable to respond since no FMC provision is specified which the appellant contents wa:rant consideration by the City Council.

3. The change in the type and intensity of use at the Project site should result in a requirement for the Project to provide parking in accordance with FMC Section I7.52.510(F) parking standa"rds or for the Project applicant to obtain approval of a variance if such parking requirements are not met. FMC Section 17.52.510(F) states, ooAll uses must provide parking spaces at the following ratios:..." Although the applicable parking standard is based on building size, it is the change in use that results in the requirement to comply with the standard.

Citv Staff Response:

Section 17.52.510(F) of the Folsom Municipal Code requires that all retail, office, restaurant, museum, and similar uses provide one parking spaces per 350 square feet of building space. This requirement is met because the project applicant is proposing to provide 15 parking spaces in a nearby private (non-public) parking lot to serve the 6 Page 490
01/11/2022 Item No.15.
proposed project where I 1 parking spaces would be required under FMC I7 .52.510(F).

The Code does not require the required parking spaces be provided on-site within the Sutter Street Subarea.

4. The actual parking demand that would be generated by the Project was not assessed or disclosed in the staff information presented to the HDC. An understanding the actual parking demand is essential for meaningful consideration of the Project impacts to Historic District businesses, visitors, and residents as a result of the increased parking buden. Without that asscssmcnt and information, thc Council is not sufficiently informed for consideration of whether the Findings required for approval of a CUP can be made.

Citv Staff Response:

In evaluating new development projects within the Historic District and outside of the Historic District, City staff utilizes the respective parking-related sections of the Folsom Municipal Code to determine the specific parking requirements. As an example, if a new 3,500-square-foot craft brewery were proposed to be built on a vacant parcel within the Sutter Street Subarea, City staff would require the project to provide 10 parking spaces in accordance with Section 17.52.510 of the Folsom Municipal Code.

With respect to changes of use within existing buildings in the Sutter Street Subarea, City practice has also been that projects that do not result in an increase in density (increased building square footage) such as, for example, exterior tenant improvements and/or interior tenant improvements, are not required to provide any additional parking because the building is already existing and does not need to be constructed.

While City staff determined that the Barley Barn Tap House project was not required to provide any parking spaces per established City practice, City staff and the applicant did recognize that the existing building's change in land use from a retail business to a craft beer establishment has the potential to result in a higher demand for parking. To address this concern, the applicant entered into a lease agreement to utilize 15 parking spaces located within the nearby Eagles Lodge parking lot (approximately 200 feet to the east of the subject property across Scott Street) for exclusive use by Eagles Lodge members as well as customers and employees of Barley Barn Tap House. To ensure that adequate parking is continuously provided for the proposed project, the lease agreement for the 15 parking spaces at the Eagle Lodge property is required to remain in effect as long as Barley Barn Tap House or any subsequent establishment operates at this location pursuant to the Conditional Use Permit.

5. The number of parking spaces for persons with a disability that are required based on the Project's actual parking demand and for compliance with FMC 17.57 .050 has not been identified. The Project proposes to install an accessible lift to allow use of an existing handicapped parking space at an adjacent property separated by as much as 7 Page 491
01/11/2022 Item No.15.
100 feet of travel between the parking space and Barley Barn. It is unclear that this concept would November 24, 2021 Page 2 provide parking and access to the Project for persons with a disability without also reducing the availability of existing handicapped parking spaces that already serve existing businesses.

Citv Staff Response:

The parking spaces proposed by the Barley Barn Tap House project is required to provide one parking space for individuals with a disability pursuant to Section 17 .57 .050(8) of the Folsom Municipal Code. The applicant is required to comply with this requirement, which is consistent with the requirements established by the 2019 California Building Code. The 2019 California Building Code (CBC Section 118- 208.1) requires one handicapped accessible parking space for projects that are required to provide between I and 25 parking spaces. The proposed project includes one handicapped accessible parking space which will be located in the adjacent Powerhouse Pub parking lot (under same ownership). City staff has determined that the proposed project meets the accessible parking requirement.

6. The existing daily and peak-hour vehicle trip volumes and estimated Project daily and peak-hour trip volumes on streets within the Project area (e.g., Scott, Bridge, Sutter, Figueroa, Mormon, Coloma, Leidesdorff, and Riley streets) have not been assessed or disclosed in the City's evaluation. Yet, an understanding of existing and Project-related vehicle trips is essential for meaningful consideration of the Project's traffic-related impacts to Historic District businesses, visitors, and residents and to understand if there are any locations and/or time periods during which Project trips would exacerbate traffic conditions in a manner that would affect motorist, bicyclist, and/or pedestrian circulation or safety (including, but not limited to, increased traffic volumes, changes in vehicle circulation patterns, and increased risk of vehicle/pedestrian collision).

Without that assessment, the City Council would not be sufficiently informed for consideration of whether the Findings required for approval of a CUP can be made.

Citv Staff Response:

The Barley Barn Tap House project involves a proposed craft beer business within an existing building. The proposed project does not involve any changes or modifications relative to streets, driveways, or pedestrian access. City staff evaluated the proposed project to determine whether there would be any traffic, access, and circulation-related impacts and determined that there would be no impacts based on nature of the project, the low projected amount of vehicle trips (approximately 28 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips, ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition), and the lack of any need to provide project-related modifications to street-driveway-pedestrian features. It is also important to note that City practice is only to prepare project-specific traffic studies for new development projects and/or or development projects that involve significant changes and that these projects generate more than 50 Weekday PM Peak Hour trips. 8 Page 492
01/11/2022 Item No.15.

Based on these factors, staff determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant traffic, access, and circulation related impacts and that no further analysis is required.

7. Issues surrounding the proposed use of the Eagles Lodge parking lot for the Project have not been seriously vetted. Staff statements at the HDC hearing suggested that staff acknowledges that there are at least three days each week that the lot is used by the Eagles. The frequency of special events and other circumstances that might also preclude use of tho Eaglos lot for Barley Barn parking on other days have simply not been addressed yet are important to understand in assessing whether the Eagles lot component of the Project has merit.

Citv Staff Response:

The project owner/applicant has entered into a lease agreement with the Eagles Lodge for the joint use of 15 parking spaces located in their private (non-public) parking lot located at2l5 Scott Street. Accordingto a representative for the Eagles Lodge, the Lodge hosts special events at their facility one to two times per month. The Lodge also hosts board meetings (approximately ten board members) every other Tuesday from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. In addition, the Lodge is open to its members (approximately 200 members) Wednesday and Friday nights from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Given the limited number of events and scheduled uses at the Eagles Lodge, staff has determined that the leased parking spaces at the private Eagles Lodge parking lot will be available for use by employees and customers of the Barley Barn Tap House on a regular basis.

8. Although availability of the Eagles lot for use by the Project might be more limited than some have suggested, use of the Eagles lot by the Project would be an expansion of the existing use (e.g., more days and longer hours of use, increased simultaneous inbound/outbound vehicles, etc.) and requires meaningful evaluation in terms of required entitlements, design standards, circulation, and public safety. Issues warranting meaningful evaluation include:
a. The Eagles Lodge parking expansion of use should be considered in terms of FMC chapter 17.57 "Parking Requirements" associated with 'ochange of occupancy or use" (17.57.030(I) requirements and design standards. An assessment of required modifications to the Eagle's parking lot and the parking lot's interface with Canal Street for compliance with the FMC parking design standards is needed. b. City-owned right-of-way (Canal Street) provides access to the Eagles Lodge parking lot and the expansion of use of the parking lot requires a design assessment to determine if and what modifications are required for the parking lot's ingress/egress to Canal Street and the Canal Street/Scott Street intersection. 9 Page 493
01/11/2022 Item No.15.
c. The Project's expansion of use at the Eagles Lodge parking lot would exacerbate existing vehicle/pedestrian collision risk associated with 1) pedestrian movement along Canal Street between Bridge Street and Scott Street, 2) pedestrian circulation along Scott Street crossing Canal Street, and 3) pedestrian circulation across Scott Street between the Project (Barley Barn) and the Eagles Lodge parking lot. A meaningful evaluation of these issues is needed.

Citv Staff Response:

Becausc the Barley Barn Tap Ilousc projcct is locatcd within thc Flistoric District, it is subject to the parking requirements in Section 17.52.510(F) of the Folsom Municipal Code. The proposed project includes the joint use of the existing Eagles Lodge parking lot; no change of use of either the Eagles Lodge or its parking lot is proposed, hence no review for the Eagles Lodge parking lot is required under Section 17.57.030(C) of the Folsom Municipal Code. The Historic District Commission did place a condition of approval (Condition No. 31) on the Barley Barn Tap House project that requires the owner/applicant make a good faith effort to pave and strip the Eagles Lodge parking lot with the voluntary approval of the Eagles Lodge.

Access to the Eagles Lodge parking lot is provided by an existing driveway located on south side of Canal Street, slightly east side of the intersection of Scott Street and Canal Street. The proposed project does not involve any changes or modifications to Canal Street or to the Eagles Lodge parking lot area (other than the potential paving and striping of the parking lot area). As a result, no design assessment is necessary with respect to ingress and egress associated with Canal Street and the Eagles Lodge parking lot.

The Barley Barn Tap house project includes the utilization ofthe existing Eagles Lodge parking lot through a joint-use lease agreement. No change to the already-existing use of the Eagles Lodge parking lot for vehicular parking is proposed, although it is expected that the parking lot will be utilized more frequently than it is currently used.

Pedestrian access to the project site from the Eagles Lodge parking lot is safely provided by existing sidewalks located along both sides of Scott Street, the north side of Sutter Street, and the south side of Riley Street. There are existing pedestrian crosswalks located at the intersection of Sutter Street and Scott Street and the intersection of Riley Street and Scott Street. City staff evaluated the existing on-site and off-site pedestrian circulation system and determined that the existing pedestrian facilities are safe and adequate to serve the proposed project.

9. The Project does not qualiff for CEQA exemption. Assuming for the sake of argument that CEQA Guidelines section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, were applicable to the design review approval, there is no basis for extending that exemption to approval of the CUP. Issuance of the CUP is a 10 Page 494
01/11/2022 Item No.15.
discretionary action and subject to CEQA. Simply put, a CUP that allows for a substantial change in the use of the property cannot be excused from CEQA review using a CEQA exemption applicable to the conversion of a small structure. Nor can the section 15303 exemption be extended to other components of the Project that are unrelated to the conversion of the structure (e.g., installation of a lift that is not a part of the structure and is located 50 feet or more from the structure to be converted; expansion of use at a parking lot at a separate property and located 200 feet or more from the structure to be converted). An environmental document in compliance with CEQA must bo propared to evaluate and disclose the Project's potential impacts.

Citv Staff Response:

The Barley Barn Tap House project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Section 15303 applies to conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. One of the examples given under Section 15303 in urbanized areas is ooup to four such commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area on sites zoned for such use, if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive." While Section 15303 allows up to four commercial buildings not exceeding a total of 10,000 squaxe feet in floor area, the proposed project involves only one commercial building that is only 4,377 square-foot in size. Additionally, based on staff s analysis of this project, none of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines apply to prevent the use of the categorical exemption in this case.

Exceptions listed within Section 15300.2 include: (a) Location, (b) Cumulative Impact, (c) Significant Effect, (d) Scenic Highway, (e) Hazardous Waste Sites, and (f) Historical Resources. A description of the most applicable of these exceptions is listed below with a brief response as to why each of these exceptions do not apply to the proposed project.
(b) Cumulative Impact. The exemption is inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

In analyzing whether this exception applies, both the oosame type" and the oosame place" limitations have to be considered. When analyzing this exception with respect to the proposed project, the City staff considered projects of the oosame type" to be other projects with similar uses, such as those projects listed on the hours of operation chart that appears in the noise impacts section of the Planning Commission report. City staff considered projects in the "same place" to be projects on Sutter Street. 1l