Folsom City Council
March 14, 2023

1 Agenda
City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom
Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public
Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority
/ South of 50 Parking Authority Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 March 14, 2023
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority / South of 50 Parking Authority Meeting

City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, March 14, 2023 6:30 PM

Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor

YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

AGENDA
Effective July 7, 2022, the City of Folsom returned to all in-person City Council, Commission, and Committee meetings. Remote participation for the public will no longer be offered.

Everyone is invited and encouraged to attend and participate in City meetings in person.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Rodriguez The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council Meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming the Month of March 2023 as American Red Cross Month in the City of Folsom

3 2. City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Second Quarter Financial Report

3. Presentation on the Folsom Boulevard Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Feasibility Study CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

4. Approval of January 18, 2023 Special Meeting Minutes

5. Approval of February 16, 2023 Special Meeting Minutes

6. Approval of February 28, 2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

7. Resolution No. 10999 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 18-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project

8. Resolution No. 11000 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-034) with Water Works Engineers, LLC for Design Services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project)

9. Resolution No. 11001 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 21-006) with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project and Appropriation of Funds

10. Resolution No. 11002 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products for the Supply of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant and Appropriation of Funds

11. Resolution No. 11003 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds

12. Resolution No. 11004 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with McGuire and Hester, Inc. for the Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street Friction Enhancement Project

13. Resolution No. 11005 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project
PUBLIC HEARING:

14. Folsom Ranch Apartments Development Agreement Amendment – Northwest Corner of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive (MSTR 22-218)
i. Ordinance No. 1337 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan (Introduction and First Reading)

4 CONVENE JOINT MEETING

JOINT AGENDA
Joint City Council / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority / South of 50 Parking Authority Meeting ROLL CALL: Council / Board Members: Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Rodriguez
CONSENT CALENDAR:

15. Approval of the December 13, 2022 Joint City Council / Redevelopment Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes

16. Receive and File the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority Monthly Investment Reports for the Month of December 2022

ADJOURNMENT

RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING

COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA S HOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

5 The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Coun cil meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Librar y located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

6 This page intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing.

PROCI.AMATION

OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF MARCH zoz3
as

AMERICAN RED CROSS MONTH
in the City of Folsom
WHEREAS, in times of crisis, people in Folsom come together to care for one another. This humanitarian spirit is part of the foundation of our community and is exemplified by the American Red Cross; and
WHEREAS, in 1881 , Clara Barton founded the American Red Cross, turning her steadfast dedication for helping others into a bold mission of preventing and alleviating human suffering. Today, we honor the kindness and generosity of Red Cross volunteers and donors here in Folsom who support this lifesaving legacy.

WHEREAS,in the January 2023 Calilornia storms and floods, the Red Cross and its disaster response partners provided more than 59,700 meals and snacks, 9,200 overnight shelter stays, and relief supplies to more than 5,900 households. ln addition, during the past Northern California wildfire season, from July 4 through November 18, 2022, Red Cross volunteers opened 27 evacuation shelters, which included 3,411 overnight stays and the distribution of 9,181 relief items and comfort kits, giving hope to the most vulnerable in their time of need.

WHEREAS, in addition to its seasonal disaster response, the Red Cross provides assistance after individual home fires, collects and distributes essential blood donations to save lives, supports military service members, veterans, and their families, and provides training in first aid, CPR and other skills. Because this work to prevent and alleviate human suffering is vital to strengthening our community's resilience, we dedicate this month of March to the American Red Cross, its volunteers and donors, and ask others to join in this commitment to give back in our community; and
NOW, THEREFORE, l, ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ, Mayor of the City of Folsom, on behalf of the Folsom City Council, do hereby proclaim March 2023 as Red Gross Month and encourage community members to reach out and support this humanitarian mission.

PROCLAIMED this 14th day of March 2023'
Attest:

Rosario rigu OR Christa F CITY CL

03/14/2023 Item No.1.

This page intenti"ono,Ily Ieft blqnk
to facilitqte double- sided printing .

F OLSOII{

CITY OF
DI9TINCTIVE EY NATURE

03/14/2023 Item No.1.
.: !1., i.i
i' t,i L:r {.:.i:\'i
i:. -:rit!1!rr t: i !-l! t:

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RE,COMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Second Quarter Financial Report.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.

The Quarterly Financial Report for the second quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 ts an analysis of the unaudited financial status of the City's major funds, covering the six-month period from July 2022 through December 2022. Please refer to the Appendices of the report for detailed schedules of the City's key funds for the period ended December 31,2022.

POLICY / RULE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.

Section 3 .02.050 (b) of the Folsom Municipal Code states '0. . . . within 30 days after the end of each quarter during the fiscal year, and more often if required by the City Council, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a financial and management report." 1 MEETING DATE: 3t1412023
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Second Quarter Financial Report
F'ROM: Finance Department

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

ANALYSIS
Economic Update:

As of December 2022, unemployment was 3.7Yo and 3.5o/o in California and Sacramento County respectively and in Folsom, the unemployment rate was 2.5%. As a comparison, in December 202l,the unemploymentrates were 4.SYoinCalifornia, 4.7o/oin Sacramento County and 4.7Yo in Folsom. A comparison of home sales during the second quarter of FY 2022-23 and FY 2021-22 shows the number of homes sold decreased by 106 or 23.77%. The average median sales price through the second quarter of FY 2022-23 was $741,250 which is an increase of 0.25% over FY 202I-22.

General Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23 is currently projected to end the year with a General Fund unassigned fund balance of $22.75 million. As a comparison, the unassigned fund balance in FY 2021-22 was$23.26 million. The unassigned fund balance as a percentage of expenditures is projected at2l.04%o for FY 2022-23 and for FY 2021-22, it was 23.69%. The unassigned fund balance as a percentage ofexpenditures is expected to continue to decline as costs continue to increase.

Fiscal Year2022-23 total projected revenues of $107.60 million is an increase of $3.98 million, or 3.84%o over the prior fiscal year, and a projected increase of $2.26 million, or 2.l5Yo over FY 2022-23 budgeted revenues of $105.34 million. The increase is seen mostly in charges for services, intergovernmental revenue, sales tax and property tax.

Property tax received in the first half of the fiscal year was $14.97 million and compared to the prior fiscal year is an increase of $1.57 million. The current projection is for property tax to end the fiscal year with a slight increase of $367,000 over the budgeted amount of $36.05 million, which would be an increase of $3.19 million from FY 202I-22 or 9.6loh.

Sales tax is projected to end the fiscal year at $28.38 million, an increase of $482,000 over the budgeted amount of $27.90 million. When compared to the results for FY 2021-22 sales tax revenues of 527.90 million, total sales tax is projected to increase by only L73% year over year.

Through the second quarter, charges for services were $7.08 million and the current projection for the end of FY 2022-23 is $14.48 million. The projection of $14.48 million is an increase from the $13.11 million budgeted but a decrease from the $15.84 million received in the prior year. The increase over the budgeted amount is mostly related to better than expected Parks and Recreation revenues, up $401,000. Also, development charges are projected to be up $801,000 over the budgeted amount, however, this is passed through for contracted services in the Folsom Plan Area. The decrease in charges for services when compared to the prior fiscal year is in development charges, down approximately $821,000, related to a slowing of fee revenue related to the Plan Area development and a decrease in Parks and Recreation user fees of $468,000.
2 Page 10
03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 total projected General Fund expenditures are $108.12 million, 52.78 million (2.64%) more than the appropriated amount of $105.34 million. The projected expenditure total includes salaries and benefits ending the year over budget by $384,000, an increase in contracts of $1.99 million and an increase in capital outlay of $192,000. The projected increase in salaries is primarily in the Fire Department ($1.56 million) and is mostly due to overtime and MOU changes, and this is partially offset by savings due to vacancies in the police department for part of the year ($676k) and other vacancies city-wide.

Utility Enterprise Funds :

All three Utility Operating Funds are projected to end the fiscal year with operating revenues exceeding operating expenses. Working Capital in Water and Wastewater is projected to increase once capital expenses are included. Working Capital in Solid Waste is expected to decrease slightly. In the case of Water and Wastewater, the capital outlay is for capital projects and vehicles and in Solid Waste, it is the purchase of replacement vehicles.

A year over year comparison ofthe fiscal year-end projection ofexpenses and revenues in the combined operating and capital funds shows charges for service revenues in Water are currently projected to increase by $1.36 million (7.61%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $2.46 million (2450%). The increase in operating expenses is mostly seen in salaries and benefits, maintenance and operations, and contract costs. Wastewater Operating charges for services revenues are projected to increase by $2.53 million (29.57%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $1.09 million (27.59%). The increase in expense in Wastewater is seen mostly in salaries and benefits, maintenance and operations, and contract costs. Solid Waste Operating charges for services revenues are projected to increase by $ 1 .56 million (7 .94%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $3.76 million (28.54%). Increases in expenses are mainly due to employee and contract costs. The increase in expenses and revenues in Solid Waste are both directly attributable to the regulations regarding food waste and the change in recyclables.

Expenses for capital improvements are currently projected to increase across all three enterprise funds when compared to the prior year. The increase is due to budgeted project and vehicle replacement costs.

Submitted,
Tamagni
V^
Elaine Andersen
City Manager
J
Finance Director/CFO

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

F('I-SOn{
clTY or
DIgTII{CTIVS EY NATURE
City of Folsom
Quarterly Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Second Quarter
March 1412023
Prepared by the Office of Management and Budget
Financial Analysis and Reporting Division

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Table of Contents
Section
Introduction.

Appendix
Combined General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement
General Fund Departmental Expenditure Summary
Housing Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement
Lighting and Landscaping District Statement
Water Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Wastewater Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Solid Waste Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Page No.
1 1Executive Summary.

Financial Results
a) General Fund........ ..........2
b) Enterprise Funds
c) Other Funds...

City Housing Fund
Risk Management
Lighting and Landscape Districts ...

Plan Area Impact Fees.....
5 6
6 6
,7
.7
8 9
.........1 1
10 t4
15 .......16

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Second Quarter Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2022-23
clYY oa
s'@r-s@h&
Introduction
This financial report provides an overview ofthe City's unaudited financial position through the second quarter offiscal year (FY) 2022-23 (July l, 2022,t\rolgh December 31,2022) for (l) the General Fund, (2) Housing Special Revenue i'und and L&L Districts, (3) the major enterprise operating funds, and (4) the Risk Management Intemal Service Fund.

Notable cumulative second quarter to second quarter and budget to actual comparisons are included in this report in addition to year-end projections.

Executive Summary
During the first two quarters of FY 2022-23 almost all COVID-l9 related restrictions had been lifted and the economy remained strong. However, additional influences are causing economic challenges. Persistent inflation and ongoing supply chain issues have caused costs to continuously increase. This is impacting almost all City departments as the cost ofpurchasing services and supplies and labor costs continue to grow at a faster rate than the City's revenue sources' This is resulting in current projected year-end General Fund revenues of $107.60 million and projected expenditures of $10S.12 million, a deficit of $515,000 by the end of the fiscal year. It is projected that the General Fund's unassigned fund balance will decrease from $23.26 million to $22.75 million by the fiscal year end. Below is a chart of the unassigned fund balance over the last ten years and displays the projected change from FY 2021-22toFY 2022-23.

Unassigned General Fund Balance
$30,000,000
$28,000,000
$26,000,000
$24,000,000
$22,000,000
$20,000,000
$ I 8,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10.000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
$23,260,4U
23-690/0

30.00%
2s.00%

20.00o/o

15.00%

10.00%

5.00%

0.00%
s22,
$6,630,937

9.54o/o
s8,1s7,227
ll.54o/o
$15,529,576

19.90o/o $15,699,123

18.44o/o
$10,950,323
14,730/0
FY16 FY17 FY18
Actual Actual Actual
$13,776,114

14.44o/o
FY2O FY21
Actual Actual
$l?'397'0,13

20.09o/o
FY19
Actual
$19,200,703

21.38o/o
2l,04Vo
FY14
Actual
FY15
Actual
FY22
Actual
FY23
Projected
IUnassigned Fund Balance -f % of Expenditures

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Property Tax
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
Charges for Services
License, Permits & VLF
Tiansfers In
All Other
Suttotal Rer,enue
ARPA
Total Rerrcnue
FY2l-22 Actual
Dec.3l,202l
$ 13,398,952
8,690,268
816,724
6,651,062
5,803,625
2,t55,854
933,997
$ 38,4s0,482
404,525
FY22-23 Actlup'l
Dec.3L,2022
$ r4,970,0M
9,048,948
635,808
7,079,153
972,366
2,277,559
1,085,220
FY22-23
Budget
$ 36,050,672
27,900,289
2,200,000
t3,1r4,657
13,181,748
7,805,245
3,713,436
Fv22-23
Projected
$ 36,417,513
28,382,275
2,200,000
14,480,954
13,033,243
7,319,652
Over/Under
Budget
$ 366,841
481,986
oh of
Budget
10t%
t02%
100%
[0%
99o/o
t,366,297
(r48,505)
(485,5e3)
680,814 I
$ 36,069,098
t,373,165
$ 103.966,047
t,373,165
s 106,227,887
1,373,165
s 2,261,840 lU.
37 $
General Fund: Operating Revenues
The following table includes cumulative revenue comparisons through the second quarter of FY 2021-22 andFY 2022- 23 and a revenue budget comparison for FY 2023-23 with year-end projections.

General Fund operating revenues through the second quafter areS37.44 million, which is 3.64% less than the same period inFY 2021-22. Revenues are at 3554% of the budget through the second quarter of the current year, primarily due to the timing associated with receiving some of the larger revenue sources. For instance, property tax is the largest General Fund revenue source, but funding is received in two installments, of which one has been received. The second installment will be received during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.

The following is an explanation of the notable variances:
. Property tax revenues exceeded last year's cumulative second quarter by 11.73% or $1.57 million. A comparison of home sales during the second quarter of FY 2022-23 andFY 2021-22 shows the number of homes sold decreased by 106 or 23.77o/o. The average median sales price through the second quarter of FY 2022-23 was 5741,250, which is an increase of 0.25Yo over FY 2021-22. The property tax revenue projection for Fiscal Year 2022-23 year-end is $367,000 greater than the budgeted amount of $36.05 million, which would exceed the prior year by $3. l9 million or 9 .6lYo. . Sales tax revenues also exceeded last year's cumulative second quarter by 4.13% or $359,000. The most recent sales tax data shows the categories of general retail, food products, transportation and the countywide pool increasing over the same period last year, all other categories were flat or decreased when compared to the same quarter in the prior year. Inflation is the biggest factor in the increased sales tax, most significantly affecting the cost of gasoline and food. The threat of a recession is looming as the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates in an effort to get inflation under control.

Based on the latest sales tax forecast, sales tax is trending to end the year slightly above the budget at $28.38 million, an increase from the prior year of $482,000 or 1.73%o. Below is a graph showing sales tax revenue for the current fiscal year and the past five fiscal years. This illustrates the dips and rises shallowing and leveling off.
2

03/14/2023 Item No.2.
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
$22,294,827
Actual
FY18
Actual
F'Y19
Actual
FY2O
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Budget
F'Y23
$28,382,275
Projection
F'Y23
$25,3s9,293
Sales Tax $27,900,289
s27,900,779
$25,846,985
$22,616,404
I
l
I
i
I
I
i
i
I
l
I
I
I
I
:

I
I
l
i
. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collections are at $636,000 through the second quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year aI $2.20 million, a decrease of $398,000, or l5.32Yo when compared to the FY 2021-22 amount. Hotel stays inFY 2021-22 were impacted favorably due to stays related to the Caldor Fire. The decrease projected for FY 2022-23 puts TOT collections more in line with a normal year. . Charges for services, including building and engineering fees, Parks and Recreation user fees, and ambulance fees are at $7.08 million through the second quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year at $14.48 million.

The current projection is $1.36 million less than the prior year amount of $15.84 million. The Parks and Recreation charges through the second quarter were $2.24 million and a comparison to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year shows an increase of $391,000. Ambulance fees through the second quarter were $1.94 millionandcomparedtothepriorfiscalyearthisisanincreaseof$182,000or10.35%. Theprojectionfor ambulance fees at fiscal year-end is $4.50 million, which will be an increase from the prior year by $267,000 or 6.31%o. Community Development charges are at$2.22 million through the second quarter and are currently projected to end the fiscal year at $3.17 million. Compared to the prior fiscal year this would be a decrease of $821,000 or 20.57o/o. The projected decrease in Community Development charges is due to a decrease in engineering activity, mostly in the Folsom Plan Area, through the second quarter. . License and permit fees and Vehicle License Fees (VLF) quarter to quarter increased $80,000 and are projected to end the fiscal year at $12.33 million which would be a decrease of $458,000 compared to the budget and a decrease of $249,000 when compared to the prior year. The year over year decrease is due to slowing building permit activity mostly in the Folsom Plan Area.
. Miscellaneous revenues decreased 12.63% or $57,000, through the second quarter when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.

General Fund: Department Operating Expenditures
The following table includes cumulative second quarter actual expenditure comparisons for FY 2021-22 andFY 2022- 23 andan expenditure budget-to-actual comparison for FY 2022-23.

J

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Salaries
Benefits
o&M
Capital outlay
Debt Service
FY2l-22 Acfial
Dec,3l,202l
$ 20,766,121
13,100,699
I 1,558,480
l,t45,6ll
Iry22-23 Lctval
Dec.31,2022
$ 21,039,868
9,6M,930
12,087,404
1,875,777
w22-23
Budget
$ ,14,506,153
29,350,980
25,997,402
5,135,284
F-rI2243
Projected
$ 45,313,762
28,857,107
28,268,828
5,327,284
Over/Under
BuQet
$ 807,609
(4e3,873)
2,271,426
192,0w
o/o of
Budget
101.8%

98.3o/o
108.7o/o
103.7Vo
100.0%20
:::, .).t,, !'/ ,r :,:'j'.11,:r1l l;:1r .1f iiil,;rtrt :r; ::, a,:.:l,,.iii;)t.;i:;l '.;:, 1 1 :,'tLii\',i1.1';:),., .,ll liflr,..r.lri,"t. li.. lji; lill)ll Overall, cumulative second quarter General Fund expenditures decreased 4.260 compared to the second quarter of the prior year and are coming in at 42.51Yo percent of the budget through the second quarter of FY 2022-23. This is in part due to a high number of vacant positions in both the Police and Fire Departnents for the first half of the fiscal year. The projection for the end of the fiscal year is for expenditures to be at $108.12 million which would be $2.78 million more ihan the budgeted amount or 102.640A of budget. The projected increase in expenditures is primarily due to increases in overtime, services and supplies, and contract costs.

The table below shows a comparison for FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 for each General Fund Department.

The following is an explanation of the department specific variances of year-end projections as compared to the budget:
. Police Department is projected to end the year under budget by $671k due to vacant positions for a portion of the year.
. Fire department is projected to end the fiscal year $2.15 million (8.33%) over the budgeted amount, which is mainly seen in overtime costs and vehicle maintenance. Overtime costs have been impacted by many vacant positions and long-term absences. Vehicle maintenance costs are up due to both inflation and the nature of maintaining aging equipment.
. Community Development department is projected to end the fiscal year $1.66 million (26.16%) over the budgeted Ermount, which is mostly due to increases in contract costs that are partially offset by increased revenues.
. Non-Departmental is projected to end the fiscal year $800,000 under budget, which represents the unspent portion of the contingency budget ($900k total). However, it is anticipated that the contingency will be spent on emergency roofrepair projects this fiscal year and the year-end expenditure projection will increase.

Overall General Fund departments' expenditures are trending at budget (in line with the 50Yo expectation) at this point in the fiscal year.
4 F"Y21-22 Actual
Dec.3l,202l
Creneral Covemment S 4,291,661
Police 12,174,164
Fire 12,126,M0
Connnunity Development 3,630,7W
Parks & Recreation 7,309,624
Library 816,994
Public Works 3,897,290
FY22-23 Actual
Dec,31,2022
$ 4,nL6v2
11,530,372
I 1,728,108
3,7U,2v7
7,960,833
759,621
3,252,380
T{2243
Budget
$ 9,823,314
27,476,204
25,777,872
6358,668
16,487,763
2,013,963
8,685,563
w22-23
Projected
$ 9,736,133
26,804805
n,925,622
8,022,029
16,969,394
1,953,963
8,788,s63
Orrcr/Under
BuQet
$ (87,181)
(67r,399)
2,147,750
1,6r,3,361
487,631
(60,ooo)
103,000
'/o oI
Bu{et

99.r%

97.6%
108.3%
126.2%
I 7
I
7tu
97 l0
i l:.r):ri !:r't':,rr; r,;L,rrl: 't:,,:.\.i,.1.,'1,'.:t,1,,,'',i,,,,,t.i),, :.., l1:r,, lir. r ri , 'i, :.rli;,.,r ' r, it',t ',1 ',, 'i", ',.' '.li: ,

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Enterprise F'unds:

Water Fund
The Water Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the following funds: Water Impact, Water Operating, Water Capital and Water Meters.

The table below includes cumulative second quarter actual revenue and expense comparisons for FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 and a budget to actual comparison for FY 2022-23 for the Water Operating Fund.

The Water Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $19.23 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out are projected to end the year at $13.60 million, or 97 .1Yo of budget. This reduction from budgeted amounts is mostly due to savings due to vacantpositions for part of the fiscal year. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $4.31 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $23.93 million.

Wastewater Fund
The Wastewater Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Wastewater and Wastewater Capital Funds Program Revenues $ 8,655,286 $ 9,624,069 $ 19,229,500 $ 19,228,500 $ (1'000) 100.0%

97.73%Capital Bipenses
$
$
$
$
$
$

92.7%

97.5o/o
100.0%
100.0%

0.0%

97.77%5,847,550
728,606
5,605,914
1,076,107
$ 13,912,787
$ 4,414,222
$ 13,602,787
$ 4,3t4,222
(310,000)
(100,000)
YY22-23 Actual
Dec.31,2022
1,623,460
765,467
2,765,533
451,454
YY22A3
Bu@et
3,420,072
2,394,631
7,001,518
1,106,566
YY22-23
ProJected
3,170,072
2,324,631
7,001;518
1,106,566
Orrcr/Undcr
Buftet
(250,000)
(60,000)
o/o of
Buftet
FV2l-22 Actual
Dec.3l,2021
l,5lg,37l
1,088,730
2,7gg,gg6
450,563
Salaries
Benefits
Operating E>ipenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
',1t, ;',:,1i',;;;'
",:t1.' li,,'.i]l.:,':'il'i,,:,
$ 5,000,319 s 6,457,273 $ 10,985,200 $ 11,160,200 $ 175,000 10159% Capital Eryenses

93.42%

74.44%
Salaries
gram Revenues

91.40%

96.40o/o

90.96%
100.00%
866,961
424,242
593,615
362,298
Operating E>penses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
$ 2,262,858
$ 977,688
$ 2,247,116
$ 394,316
$ 6,n9,086
S 3,912,671
$ 5,819,086
$ 2,912,671
$ (410,000)
$ (l,ooo,ooo)
YY2142 Actual
Dec,3l,202l
829,715
630,151
462,670
340,322
TY22-23 Actual
Dec.31,2022
YY22-23
BuQot
l,g6l,o36
1,388,5n
2,211,390
768,143
Fv22-23
Projected
1,701,036
1,338,527
2,ol l,3go
768,143
Orrcr/Under
Budget
(160,000)
(50,000)
(200,000)
Vo of
Budget
'lllt.li Ili, ri rrr,ifri .,1, ll.i,, ,r :;.:r l ,i:i' ,:, ,1: r..l.rr:l , :: .' 5

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

The Wastewater Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $11.16 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $5.82 million, or 93.42o/o of budget. This reduction from budgeted amounts is mostly due to vacant positions for part of the fiscal year. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $2.91 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $20.96 million.

Solid Waste Fund
The Solid Waste Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Solid Waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, and Solid Waste Plan Area Capital.

The Solid Waste Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $21.27 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $18.53 million, or l00.4Yo of budget. The fund is currently projected to be slightly over budget mainly due to the increase in contract costs related to recycling and organics changes.

Total expenditures for capital outlay costs are estimated to be $3.21 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $9.85 million.

Other Funds
Cify Housing Fund
The City Housing Fund as of December 31,2022 had a cash balance of $9,463,039. The City Council had also previously approved housing project loans in an amount up to $3.5 million for the Scholar Way project of which $2.75 million has now been expended.

Risk Management Internal Service Fund
The Risk Management Fund captures the activity associated with employee and retiree health, dental and vision insurance, workers' compensation, and liability insurance expense.

As of December 3 1 , 2022, the City has paid $3.49 million for health, vision, and dental insurance for active employees and$2.27 million for retired employees and$1.27 million for workers' compensation. Liability insurance payments were $2.44 million. The total expenditures for FY 2022-23 are projected at $20.31 million, which is an increase from the prior fiscal year of $875,000, which is mostly seen in health insurance, workers compensation, and liability costs.

The projected ending unrestricted net position is $4.16 million, a planned $1.16 million decrease from FY 2021-22. 6 FY2l-22 Actual
Dec.3l,202l
FY22-23 Actual
Dec.31,2022
Fv22-23
Budget
FV2223
Projected
Over/Under
Budget
%o of
Budget
ProgramRevenues $ 10,191,474 $ 12,983,214 $ 20,545,000 $ 21,270,000 $ 725,000 1035% Salaries
Benefits
Operating Eryenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
1,676,'796
1,398,596
2,689,386
828,477
1,935,30r
890,451
3,47t,522
819,214
4,175,985
3,r83,766
9,377,r58
1,723,195
4,175,985
3,083,766
9,542,158
1,723,195
(100,000)
165,000
100.0%
%.9%
t01.8%
100.0%

0.0%
1004%$
$
6,593,255
799,495
$ 7,116,488 $ 18,460,r04
$ 10,209,664
$ 18,525.104
$ 3,209,664
$ 65,000
$ (7,000,000)Capital Expenses $ 31.4%
w

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

Liehting and Landscape Funds
There are 29 Lighting and Landscape (L&L) Districts in the City of Folsom. Each District has its own budget and maintenance requirements to maintain various types of assets ranging from shrub beds, mini parks, walls, fences, monument signs, streetlights, bollards, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, artwork, a waterfall, walkways/trails, open space, trees, and electrical services.

Some activities that have taken place in the L&L's during this time period include:

District Project Date Cost
Prairie Oaks Ranch Fence Replacement 1212712022 $2,736.38 Briggs Ranch Fence Replacement t2t2712022 $10,194.75
Willow Creek Estates
South Repair leaning monument sign 12/1612022 $5,997.63 American River Canyon
North
Fence replacement 12127/2022 $5,293.26
Broadstone lr2&4 Accident Damage repair to Entry
Sign
1012412022 92t,223.37
Other activities that have taken place in the L&L's this quarter include o Extensive clean up and repair from recent storms.
. Appointed new committee members to the Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee ct Fees
Total Plan Area Impaot Fees received through the second quarter of FY 2022-23 were $5.80 million. Expenditures during the second quarter totaled approximately $2.38 million in all Plan Area Impact Fee funds. Expenditures were for Fire Station 34 construction, progress payments for one Type 3 Fire Engine and one Type I Fire Engine, Prospector Park construction, and design costs for the Folsom Plan Area Trails project.

Plan Area Im
7

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIXA
City of Folsom, California
Combined General Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2022
Fv 2022
As of
r2l3lD02l
Fy 2023
As of
FY22 forecst
As of

VARIANCB
Forcffit vs Budget

VARIANCE
FY2022
36,t22,455
2,359,321
15,061,209
625,878
645,340
15,t24
4466,4t9
3,611,090
66046s
2,998,099

23.260.484
t2,364,899
50,188,688
1,543,951
8,014,879
t3,E78,728
6,180,073
5,449,623
FY 2023
BUDCET
Aotal Budaet
ASSETS
Cash dd lnvoshnents
htorgovem$t3VState
Accounts re@ivable/@crued interest
Intedrnd Rec€ivable/ Advsceslloils
fixcd Alsets (less AocDop)
Inventory
Preprid ltems

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES
Accomts Payable ud Accroed liabilities
Wages Payable
Accrued Compemat€d Absen@s
Due to O$er Fuds
Inierftnd Adva@s / loils
Defered rcv/ Refutrdable Deposits
Dobt Seryice/curent Noto Payable
Debt Senice/lrtrg Tem Note Pa)€ble
Reserved for Advmes/Budgeted Prcjccts

TOTAL LIABILITIES

FUNDBALANCE
Reseryed for Inventory dd Prcpaids
Resewe il for encumbmces
Unresenrd (deflcit)
REVENI'ES:

Tarcs:

ProDe.ty
Sales And Us
Tmsient Occupeoy
Real Prcperty Tmsfer
Fruchije Fees
Other
Licenses And Pemits
htorgovcmentgl
Chsrges For Curelt Seryies
Fines And Forfeiturcs
Interest
Mis@llmoous
Openting TtrsfeN In
TOTALRf,VENUES

EXPENDITURESI
Curent Opemting:

Geneml Govemmcnt
Public Safety
Public Ways ild F&ilitier
Comuity SeFi@s
crlture md Recrearion
Non-Depar&nontal
Operating TIufe$ Out
TOTAL EXPENI'ITURf,S

APPROPRIATION OF FUNII BALANCE
fUNDBALANCqJULY T

FUNI' BALANCE
20,4t2,576
1,241
261,555
636,158
4,824

21.322360
2,218,662
(3,042,979'
8,594,841
:
-il@
640,982
378426
t2,532128
13,398,952
E,690,268
Et6J24
408,695
1,87E,600
4,329,550
6,651,062
26,E07
49,946
448,548
2,155,854
38,855,00?
43,818,001
t,247
8,001,419
232,034
t5,t24
2,531,063
(4,060,845)
247,159
1,582,483
t7,153,346
t4,970,044
9,048,948
635,808
316,915
1,958,184
387,347
7,079,t53
t8,42t
357,998
391,885
5,999,010
23,171,661
3,252,380
3,184,291
7,079949
rAer922
33,225,4sr
27,900,719
2,591,968
t,057
"152894,971
t,293,451
4,240,t11
10,043,165
15,843J96
133,009
(951,314)
795,580
$ 36,050,672
27,900,289
2,20q000
900,000
722,000
1,100,000
3,975,850
10,579,063
13,tt4,657
120,500
230,000
640,936
7,805,245
36417,513
28,38227s
2,200,000
900,000
122,000
I,100,000

3.422,338
10,984,0?0
t4,480,954
146,000
685,227
84t,023
366,841
481,986
(553,512)
405,007
t,366,297
25,500
455,227
200,087
41,051
1,536,351
103,000
t,663,361
233,399
(800,000)
(21,080,62E)
(18,851J41)
(t,564,r92)
(900,000)
0n,ooo)
(7E3,085)
(2,0t1,666)
00,t91,716)
(6,035,504)
(t02,07e)
t21,998
(249,0s1)
1J15,9ts
29J30,t93
5y'33,183
2,574,37t
1,822,382
1,2U,843
34,008,620 t9,832,116
TOTAL LHBILITIES & FUNI' BALANCE 21.322,360
$ t0t%
t02%
t00%
t00%
t000/0
t000/0
860/0
t040/o
tt00/o
t2to/o
2980/0
t3t%
42%
32%
29%
0%
0o/o
29%
49%
4%
540/o
t5%
ts6%
6t%
29%
36%
44%
44%
31%
60%
480/o
t7%
430/0
_]933e2J2_
13J14,926
52,901,t60
8,685,553
6,358,668
14,902,330
8,715,865
105,339,2t2
26,919,048
26,919,048
(247,r59)
t3,8t5,971
54A38,211
8,788,563
8,022,029
Is,t35,729
7,915,865
(515,322'
102.15%
6,t26,62t
24,t75,218
3,891,290
3,630,102
6,416,664
2,526,t02
$
46J72,597
(7,91?,590)
2t469327
13,551,836
(640,982)
(378426)
$ 12,532,428

NONSPENDABLE FT'ND BALANCN
RFJTRICTf, D FUNI' BALANCE

COMMITTED FUNI' BALANCE

ASSIGNEI' FUNDBALANCE
8 UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
Q47,t (660,465)
$ 26,671,890
(660165)

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX B
City of Folsom, California
Expendihre Summary - General Fund Departrnents
Quarter Ended December 31,2022
FX 2022
As of
nBv202l
FY 2023
As of
n/3tn022
FY22 Fmecast
' Asof
t2/31/2022

VARIANCE
FGe@st vs Budset

VARIANCE
Actual vs. Budset
$
FY 2022
ACTUAI
FY 2023
BUDGET
I 10,438
1,186,752
687,2s7
s,8s6,284
1,18s232
797,3s1
27,476,204
2s:777,872
6,358,668
t6,487,763
2,013,963
8,685,563
52,',150
562,410
294,914
2,570,t30
482,288
329,169
t2,t74,163
12,126,060
3,630,702
7,309,624
8t6,994
3,897290
38,050
525,794
340,130
2,570,657
569,599
227,462
lt,530,372
t1,728,108
3,784,297
7,960,833
759,621
3,252380
I 1s,438
1,211,752
713,843
5,U8,562
1,199,627
646,911
26,804,80s
27,925,622
8,022,029
16,969,394
r,9s3,963
8,788,563
5,000
25,000
26,586
(7:722)
14,395
(150,440)
(671,399)
2,147,7s0
t,663,361
481,631
(50,000)
103,000
t04.530/0
102.1t%
103.87%

99.87%
lOt.2lo/o
8l.l3o/o

97.s6%
108.330/.
126.160/o
I02.92o/o

97.02o/o
Iot.t9%
34o/"
44o/o
49%
44Yo
48o/o
29%
42o/o
45Yo
600/o
48%
38%
37%
$ v"
EXPENDITURXS:

City Comcil
CityMmager
City Clerk
Office ofMpt & Budget
City Asomey
Hmm Resouc.es
Police
Fire
Commity Developmot
Parks & Rereation
Libruy
Public Worts
Other
Non Depumental
Opmting Trmsfcs Out
TOTAL EXPENDITURES:
$ $ r12,377
1,166,550
591,310
4,96s,276
r,095,ztt
602,4s3
24,67s,398
25,745,729
8,014,879
t5,724,496
t,753,5ts
7,543,957
Q2,388)
(660,958)
(347,128)
(3,285,627')
(615,633)
(569,889)
(Ls,945,832)
(r4949,764)
Q,s74,371)
(8,s26,930)
(t2s4,342)
(5,433,183)
$ $ s
2,s26,102 r,491,022 6,180,073 8J15,865
s 46-772-sn s 44.778.32s g 98-171.224 $ 105,339,212
7,9t5,86s (800,000) 90.82% (7,224,843) l7o/o
S 10E.116.374 g 2.777.162 102.64Vo $ (60.560.887) 43yo
I

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX C
City of Folsom, California
Housing tr'und
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2022
REVENUES!
Tues
Intergovemmental
Chages for Cunent Sewies
Irnpact F@ Rgvenue
Interst ReYenue
Other Revenue
Operating Tldsfers In
FY 2023
As of
t2Bt/2022
w 2022 FY 2023
BUDCET

VARIANCE
Forec6t vs Budget

VARIANCE
Actual Ys Budget
FY22 Foreqst
As of
t2kt12022 % $
$ $
18,101
1,450,593
l'19,024
718
20,591
4,600
29,219
6,625,814
81,337
Q\e,334)
51,566
10,950
40,000
250,000
150,000
25,829
465,829
3 10,000
40,300
tt5,529
465,829
37,789,041
$ 37,789,041
(37,',189,041)
$-
40,000
2,450,000
300,000
25,829
2,200,000
150,000
273,000
(21,899)
1,200,593
29,024
(2s,829)
289,409
35,700
100o/o
980%
200%
100%
45o/o
580%
119Yo
0%

TOTALREYENUES
EXPENDITURES:
188%
t00%
354o/o
7%
t1%
l8l
Salary & Benefrts
Senies & Supplies
Contracts
Insulmce
Other Operating Expenses
Capital outlay
Extrotrdinary Iass on Dissolution ofRDAs
Operating Trasfers Out

TOTAL EXPENDITTJRES

APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALAIICE

FUND BALANCE, JULY I
I.IIND BALANCE

NONSPENDABLE FUND BALAIYCE

RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE

COMMITTED FUND BALANCE

ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE

UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT)
57 765
1,564,763 6,359,435
$ 39,353,803 $ 37,789,041
l00Yo
159%
50o/o
t8%
$ $ $
583,000
40,300
2,077,000
$ 39,866,04i
(39,866,04
57 87
$37
10

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPEI\DIXI)
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended December 31, 2022
Revenues:

Special Assessment
Interest
Other Revenue
Expenditures:

Communications
Utilities
Contracts
Maintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund204 Fund205 Fund207 f,'und208 Fund209 Fund210 Fund212 Fund213 Fund214 f,'und231 Fund232 Briggs
Ranch
Folsom
Ifpiohfs
Broadstone
Unit 3 Broadstone
Cobble Hills
Reflect
Sierra
Estetes
271
Natoma
VallevLos Cerros
tzl
1,537
6,979
3,068
22,654
591
Natoma
Station
428 6t2
Hannaford Lake Natoma
Cross Shores
9,780
7,586
32,210
40,583
17,024
tt5,29t
88,046
28,177

2.696
2,896
2,6t1
9,184
8 526
10,474
5,298
10,s94
593
737
1,295
3,556
428
2,711
2,000
4,441
16,953
540
106
378
4,604
661
t9
2t9
47 231
809
331
t5,232-
409
1,1 83
50 184
1,065
2,476
2,153
10,093
252
226
TotalRevenue $ 1,658 $ 428 $ 612 $ 484 $ 278 $ 1,233 $ $ r,249 s 226 s 271 $ 3,139 1,013 2,8s6
TotalExpenditures$ 33,292 $ 50,589 $175,754 $ 5,503 $ 16,781 $ 118,919 $ 15,225 $ 14,974 $ 26,959 $ 5,588 $ 23,934 1',\

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2022
Revenues:

Special Assessment
Interest
Other Revenue
Expenditures:

Communications
Utilities
Contracts
Maintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund 234 Fund236 Fund 237 Fund
Cobble Praire Oaks
Ranch Silverbrook
427
1,338 1,005
Total Revenue $ 1,338 $ 427 $ 1,005 $
249 tr'und 250 Fund 251 Fund 252 Fund 253 Fund 260 Fund 262 Fund 266 Di,IdA
Willow Creek Blue Ravine Willow Am River
Stcenlechase Creek So. Canvon No.

Willow Broadstone 3
Spres CFD#ll Cm#12East floLs
Willow
Snrinss
l6l
12,074
331
866
t4
7T
2,906
331
6s3
10 238
1,857
15,1951,331
7,047
331
474
3,3'.10
I 1,815
6,812
55,989
t.876
719
787 6,843
360
79 16r $ 1,331 $ 7S7 s 7,s62 $ 439 $ 8s $ 3,370 s 17,0s2 762
1,238
3,4t5
151
39,045
30,465
1,5 l0
602
572
2,985
2,732
7,798
394
40,302
3,377
42,358
99 2.061
24,843
331
13,85 I

1.864
368
r,295
2,667
62,787
34,326
294,921
1,621

6.36913l
TotalExpenditures $ 5,566 S '12,194 S 4,461 S 13,27L $ 7,852 $ 13,909 $ 88,197 $ 40,889 $ 4,138 S 76,492 $ 400'024 12

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPEI\IDIXI)
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended December 31, 2022
Revenues:

Special Assessment
Interest
Other Revenue
Expenditures:

Communications
utilities
Contracts
Maintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Frrnd
ARC No.2
CFD #13
14,021
13,245
43,789
t.129
Residences
ATARC
ARC
North #3
Blue Ravine
Oaks No,2
f,'olsom
IIts #2
Willow Creek
Estates #2
Prospect
Ridge TOTAL
267 Ftnd270 Fund271 Fund275 Fund278 Fund2Sl Fund282 Fund 283 Fund 284 Fund 285. Fund 288 Fund 289 ARC
No.2
Broadstone Islands
#4 CFD#16
Maint Dist Maint Dist
cFD #18 CFD #19
s63 12,158 1,943 s,460 243 15,103 6,656
TotalRevenue $ 739 $2,12t $ 563 $13,057 $ 1,943 $ 3,404 $ 238 $ 5,460 $ 941 s 243 $15,103 $ 6,656 $ 93'603 899243
496_
194
1,927
151
331
2,614
2,637
3,059
15,042
2',12
1,400
8,398
206,493
886
2,039
2,763
13,620
602
2,945
30,678
374
238
4,222
179,508
2,687
3,294
6,297
7,064
22,679
538
1,049
t99
742
7,6t7
24,814
t,032
3,332
6,t87
84,520
55,553
201,054
t1,635
3,01I
6,447
460
13,868
E,947
84,656
490823
263,203
L,419,294
18,086
38,063
301
3,103
212 556 208 626
TotalExpenditures $ 72,184 $ 3,308 $ 21,010 S219,216 $ 16,985 $ 33,997 $ 189,711 $ 37,627 $ 32,987 $ 10,759 $355,7'73 $ 21,401 $2,229,469 13

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX E
City of Folsom, California
Combined Water Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2022

OPEITATING EXPENSESI
Salaies
Benefts
utililies
Supplies
Maintenmce fld Operation
Contractual Senices
Depreciation
Other Operating Expffies
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSES):

Irpact Fes
Other
Inveslrent Income
Intergovemntal
Proc@ds of Finecing
Debt Setrice ExpeNe
Other Reimbuserenls
capiral Outlay - Prcjeds

TOTAL NONOPERATING NEVENUE
(EXPENSE)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AI\TD TRANSFERS

CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERST
Trrufes In
Trrufe6 Out

TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS

AND TRANSFERS

CIIANGE IN NET ASSETS
NETASSETS, JULY 1

NET ASSETS

RESTRICTED NET ASSETS

UNRESTRICITD NET ASSETS
FY 2022
As of
F\ 20n
As of
ta3v202l r12022
1,519,371
1,088,730
4ll,t48
4663a5
694,360
807,832
2,336,451
409,161
1,623,460
'165,467
492,653
546,868
496,641
911,20t
2j21,078
2,990,693
1,440,142
566,309
1,259,83r
85a055
2,025,175
4,656,071
FY 2023
BUDGET
FY23 Forec$t
As ofFv 2022
491,069
976,481
(51 1,785)
50,656
3,420,072
23A4,631
81a500
I,2'l1,l3l
1,166,860
2,s13,899
I,t7t,l28
12,806,221
703.605
(407,314)
l9?.100
250.000
3,1'10,012
2,324,631
812,500
1,421,131
1,266,860
2,423,899
(250,000)
(60,000)
150,000
100,000
(t 50,ooo)
(275,000)
701,374
361,000
93Vo
97%
r00%
tt2%
t09%
94%
47o/o
32%
6t%
43%
43%
360/o
21o/o
s80/o
(t,796,612)
(t,619,164)
(31e,847)
(730,263)
(670,219)
(1,656,698)
2,32r,078
9l%
98o/o
1050/0 (2s7,e00)
(421,321)
458,678
96,674
(243,244)
170
TOTAL OPERATINGEXPENSES 7''133'438
OPERATINGINCOME 92]!18
t24,523
10,933
'79,821
2A2,278
51,304
293,714

6.756
428,605
300,000
558,100
250,000
40%
-r3o/o
1,49%
3o/o
(128,606)
(313,329)
408.519
(450,563)
(4sqs63)
(42,044)
109,978,103
109,936,059
(2,561,331)
_s r0F4r^
(6,500) (460,7s6) (1,845,822) (r,E45,822'
(4,414,222)
(5,516,713)
906,566
I 86,449 200,000
(1,106,566)
(e06,566)
200,000
1,248,582 3,011,745 1,202,374
112,989,848
tt4,238,430 112,989,84E 112,989,848 114,192,222
$ 108,223,717
l00o/o
98o/o
84%
1,839,322 0%
I 15 o/o
E%
* Includes the following tuds: water Inpect Fee, water operatitrg, Water Capital dd water Meters Prior yer includc prior period adjwtment for GASB 68
(200,000) 0%
4t%
14

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIXF
City of Folsom, California
Combined Wastewater F unds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2022
OPERATING REVENUES:

Charges For Services
Prison Services

TOTAL OPERATING REVDNUES
OPERATING EXPENSrST
Salilis
Benefits
utilities
Supplies
Maintenuae md Op€ration
Contractual Sefrices
Deprecialion
Other Operating Bxpenses

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPNNSES):

Impact Fees
Investment In@me
Other
Debt Seruice
Capital Outlsy - Prcjects

TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE
(ExPENSE)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL

CONTRTBT'TIONS AND TRANSFERS
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:

Trmsfere In
Trmsfers Out

TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS

AND TRANSFERS

CHANGE INNETASSETS

NTTASSETS, JULY T
FY 2022
As of
12Brl202t
Fy 2023
As of w 2023

BIJDGET
4,961,1 l9
39,200
5,000,3 l9
829,715
630,151
35,843
134,360
r 10,862
34,926
1,163,216
146,679
3,085,753
1,914,566
19,591
64,780
6,144
(977,688)
(887,173)
1,027,393
(340,322)
(340,322)
687,071
68,969,695
69,656,765
(289,6r9)
-! ,2t!Lr*
6,423,6'13 8,561,293 10,918,000
67,200
10,985,200
1,861,036
1,388,527
95,000
555,814
328,090
816,846
415,630
5,460,943
5,524,257
60,000
156,000
0,197,198)
70,888,708
70,888,708
(8,234,732\
_s 62553,975_
FY23 Foreoast
As of
1,701,036
1,338,527
95,000
455,814
328,090
7t6,846

VARIANCE
(4,494,327)
(994,075)
(964,28s)
(57,292)
(400,0e0)
(t9'1,707)
(653,599)
1,126,893
Q4,043)
73,366 222.3%
89,115 157%
1,203,434 -l%
t0v.
(r37,755) 0%
89%
Fv 2022 Forecst s
I 1,093,000 175,000
12131
866,961
424,242
37,708
155,124
130,383
163,241
t,126,893
1,638,145
843,775
88,262
281,442
230,474
442,486
2,296,648
060,000)
(s0,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
90,000
309,000
1,423,529
100Yo
102V.
910/.
96%
l00Yo
826/0
1000/0
88%
59%
s0%
59%
47%
3to/o
40%
28%
40%
20Yo
26yo
55yo
133,366
245,115
6,236
58,694
(500,810)
626,8t0
(673)
150,000
465,000
226,331
14,296,237
250%
29|yo
-t9yo
(3,912,6"n)
(4,893,869)
630,388
137,755
(768,143)
137,755
(630,388)
3,407,529
74%
42% 00/"
3,073,668 1,919,013
73,962,376 70,888,708NET ASSETS

RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
I]NRESTRICTED NET ASSETS
* Includes the following i.uds: Sewer Operating md Sewer Capital Prioryear includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68
15

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX G
City of Folsom, California
Combined Solid Waste Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2022
OPERATING REVENUES:

Charges For Seruices

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
OPERATING EXPENSES:

Salaies
Benefits
Utilities
Supplies
Maintenuoe ild Operation
Contractual Seryices
Depreciation
Other Operating Expenses

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
oPnRATTNG TNCOME (LOSS)
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSE)r
Impact Fees
Investment Income
Intergovemmetrtal Revenues
Olher
Debt Service-Expense
Capital Outlay

TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE
(EXPENSE)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORS CAPITAI
COMRIBIJTIONS AND TRANSTE;
CAPITAL CONTRIBUaIONS AND TTANSFERS|
Trmsfers In
Trmsfers Out

TOTAL CAPITAL CONIRIBUTIONS
AI{D TRANST'ERSI

CHANGE INNETASSETS
NETASSETS, JULY 1
FY 2022
As of
12RlD02l
EY 2023
As of Fv 2022
ACTUAL
FY 2023
BI]DGET
t0,191,474
10,191,474
20,545,000
20,545,000

VARIANCE VARIANCE
Forecd vs Actual vs Budget
FY23 Forecdt
As of
$
1,935,301
890,451
21,677
132,844
631,572
1,966,531
422,872
219,273
t55,740
40,474
I'19,401
3,4t1,'169
2,069,540
4t,216
t,390,'120
1,t20,642
4,308,295
890,E01
t00%
97%
It3%
95%
t26yo
l00yo
t000/0
I000/6
63%
63V.
46%
280/o
58o/o
39%
61%
35%
t4%
40%
0%
-29%
2t
t,676,196
1,398,596
18,813
402,3'.13
417,793
1,850,407
386,656
280,147
4,17J,985
3,t83,766
37,100
1,872,533
944,533
5,66'7,087
l9 855,905
547,365
81,500
422,'176
7,073,121
4,1'15,985
3,083,'766
42,1O0
t,782,533
t,t94,533
5,661,087
197,365
104,000
247,'1',16
350,000
834,373
1,838,041
(100,000)
5,000
(e0,000)
250,000
(l50,ooo)
222,500
075,000)
(6,723,127)
(2,240,684)
(2,293,3|s)
(t5,423)
0,139,689)
(312,961)
(3,700,556)
422,8'12
2t9,369
26,188
40,627
t6t,562
3,408,145
(828,417)
(828,477)
2,579,668
(3972p20)
(1,392,3s2)
(5es,612)
_$_ll,r8?,r611
5'16,666
(235,64e)
189,645
367,259
(3,015)

72.60/0
373yo
59%
5%
3t%
288,565
(328,0e2)
74,240
(382,302)
(6,893,726)
40%
191%
100/0
3%
7 '7855l
1,723,195
(r,723,r95)
(r,123,t95)
1,003,668
1,003,668
(164,870)
$ 838,797
-91%
6,038,745 4,975,688
7,042,413 1,003,668NET ASSETS

RESTRICTED NET ASSETS

T'NRESTRJCTED NET ASSETS
* Includes the following ff.sds: Solid waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, md Solid Wdte Plm Area Capital Prior yea includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68
16

03/14/2023 Item No.2.

This page intentiono"lly left blqnk
to facilitqte double- sided printtng .

CITY OF
FOLSOl\[
DIgTINCTIVE bY NATUFE

03/14/2023 Item No.2.
g''dlt"diit}lrt
g Nts *t
aiit!lt&Yti3 ll *alt4t
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Parks and Recreation Department will present an overview of the Folsom Boulevard Pedestrian & Bicycle Overcrossing Feasibility Study.

Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks and Recreation Director
1 MEETING DATE: 3n412023
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT Presentation on the Folsom Boulevard Pedestrian & Bicycle Overcrossing Feasibility Study
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

03/14/2023 Item No.3.

This page intenttonally Ieft blonk
to facilitote double- sided printtng .

CITY OF
FOLSOh{
OIgTINCTIVE bY IIATURE

03/14/2023 Item No.3.

Book 77 Page 23a
Folsom City Council
January 18,2023
Gity Gouncil Special Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, January 18,202310:00 AM

CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 10:00 am with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.

ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember (participated via teleconference as noticed on the agenda)
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: None
Participating Staff: City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited

AGENDA UPDATE
None
NEW BUSINESS:

1. Resolution No. 10981 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Ratifying Existence of a Local Emergency
City Manager Elaine Andersen made a presentation.

Motion by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, to approve Resolution No. 10981.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council

03/14/2023 Item No.4.

Book77 Page24a
Folsom Gity Council
January 18,2023
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
City Manager Elaine Andersen asked if there was a City Council consensus and direction to return to the January 24,2023, City Council meeting to rescind the State of Local Emergency. The City Council concurred.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Rosario Rodriguez adjourned at 10:04 am.

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council

03/14/2023 Item No.4.

Book77 Page 44
Folsom City Council
February 16,2023
City Gouncil Special Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, February 16,2023 9:00 AM

CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 9:05 a.m. with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent:

Participating Staff:

Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember (arrived at 9:32 a.m.)
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steve Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANGE
The pledge of allegiance was recited

AGENDA UDPATE
[There were no agenda updates.]
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez and City Manager Elaine Andersen made introductory comments.

The following speakers addressed the City Council:

Warren Truitt, regarding the River District and the value of that area's environment Loretta Hettinger, regarding stewardship and protection of history Sharon Kindel, regarding nature and nature activism
Crystal Tobias, encouraging protection of the Lake Natoma area Bruce Cline, regarding protection of nature, especially as one of the premier attributes of Folsom Mike Reynolds, regarding community priorities and amenities NEW BUSINESS:

1. Council Workshop on Strategic Planning and Direction to Staff DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 35 03/14/2023 Item No.5.

Book77 Page 45
Folsom City Council
February 16,2023
City consultants Rick Haydon and Jan Perkins presented an overview of the workshop's objectives and two district parts, with the first part focused on governance and the second part focused on strategic planning.

The City Council discussed Council norms as standards of behavior and practices.

The City Council took a brief recess at 11:55 am for lunch, and reconvened the meeting at 12:15 p'm The City Council discussed the elements of the draft strategic plan and provided direction to staff regarding content. Council comments will be incorporated into the strategic plan document and the Oocument will be brought back to the City Council for final approval.

ADJOURNMENT
The special meeting was adjourned at 2:06 p.m

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST
Rosario Rodriguez, MaYor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 36 03/14/2023 Item No.5.

Book77 Page 44
Folsom City Council
February 28,2023
Gity Gouncil Special Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, February 28,2023 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.

ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
An na Roh rbou g h, Cou nci I me mber (p a rtici p ate d v i a te I eco nfe re n ce as noticed on the agenda)
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Council members Absent:

Participating Staff:

None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steve Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Human Resource Advisor John Spittler
Councilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): None
ADJOURNM NT TO CLOSED SESSIO N FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: Human Resources Advisor John Spittler. Employee Organization: Various Bargaining Groups
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, to adjourn to closed session for the above referenced item. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during closed session DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 37 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

Book77 Page 45
Folsom City Council
February 28,2023

ADJOURNMENT
The special meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DMFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 38 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

Book 77 Page 46
Folsom City Council
February 28,2023
Gity Gouncil Regular Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, February 28,2023 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at6:32 pm with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice MaYor
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember (pafticipated via teleconference as noticed on the agenda)
Rosario Rodriguez, MaYor
Councilmembers Absent:

Participating Staff:

None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Finance Director/CFO Stacey Tamagni
Revenue Services Supervisor Elizabeth Hanna
Police Chief Rick Hillman
Community Development Director Pam Johns
City Arborist Aimee Nunez
Environmental and Water Resources Director Marcus Yasutake

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was recited.

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that there was a revised staff report for item 12 BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

The following speakers addressed the City Council:

1. Denise Taylor regarding traffic

2. Gary Bolin regarding traffic
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 39 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

Book77 Page 47
Folsom City Council
February 28,2023

3. Nitya Narasimnan regarding SB-54 implementation

4. Agamya Rao regarding Health for Humanity Yogathon
SGHEDULED PRESENTATIONS :

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Recognizing the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh Health for Humanity Yogathon
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presented the proclamation to Pradeep Mishra from the Folsom Chapter of the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh.

2. Presentation on Transient Occupancy Tax Short-Term Rental Pilot Program Revenue Services Supervisor Elizabeth Hanna made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

GONSENT GALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

3. Approval of January 24,2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

4. Approval of February 14,2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes b. Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Historic District Commission to Fill the Architect, Landscape Architect, or Other Design Professional Seat

6. Resolution No. 10990 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-031) with HydroScience Engineers, lnc. for Design Services for the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No' 1

7. Resolution No. 10991 - A Resolution Authorizing Appropriation of Funds in the Water lmpact Fee Fund for the Folsom Reservoir Raw Water Delivery Reliability Prolect

8. Resolution No. 10992 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with lconix Waterworks lnc. for the Purchase of Gravity Sewer Pipe for the Folsom Boulevard 27- lnch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project)
g. Resolution No. '10993 - A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Department to lnstall All-Way Stop Sign Control at the lntersection of Parkshore Drive and Plaza Drive

10. Resolution No. 10994 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-032) with HydroScience Engineers, lnc. for Design Services for the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No. 2 and Appropriation of Funds

11. Resolution No. 10995 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Flock Safety for Traffic/Automated License Plate Reader Cameras DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 40 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

Book77 Page 48
Folsom City Council
February 28,2023
Motion by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, to approve the Consent Galendar.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
OLD BUSINESS:

12. Resolution No. 10998 - A Resolution Directing the Finance Director to Add Two Community Service Officer Positions to the Police Department Budget in the General Fund and Appropriation of Funds (revised)
Finance Director/CFO Stacey Tamagni made a presentation. Police Chief Rick Hillman responded to questions from the City Council with additional clarification provided by Ms. Tamagni.

Motion by Councilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to table the item until budget approval and to decide priorities at that time.

Motion failed with the following rollcallvote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Motion by Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 10998 as amended in the revised staff report.

There were additional comments from the City Council.

Councilmember Anna Rohrbough's motion carried with the following roll call vote:

Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Rodriguez
Gouncilmember(s): Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough
Gouncilmember(s): None
Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough
Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Rodriguez
Gouncilmember(s): None
Gouncilmember(s): None
NEW BUSINESS:

13. Landmark Tree Designation - City Arborist Recommendation to Establish Two New Landmark Tree Designations
i. Resolution No. 10996 - A Resolution Establishing a Landmark Tree Designation for a Valley Oak Tree in the Front Yard of 710 Sibley Street
DMFT - Not official until approved by the City Council Page 41 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

Book77 Page 49
Folsom City Council
February 28,2023
ii. Resolution No. 10997 - A Resolution Establishing a Landmark Tree Designation for an lnterior Live Oak Tree in Front of the Dermatology Center of Northern California at 192 Blue Ravine Road
Community Development Director Pam Johns made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

The following speaker addressed the City Council:
. Barbara Leary
City Arborist Aimee Nunez provided additional clarification in response to City Council questions.

Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 10996.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor YK Ghalamcherla, to approve Resolution No. 10997.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None

14. lntroduction of the City of Folsom Water Vision and Direction to Staff on the Water Vision Contents and Community Engagement Process
Environmental and Water Resources Director Marcus Yasutake made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

The City Council agreed that the contents of the program as described in the staff report are appropriate for the Water Vision process. The City Council recommended that the stakeholder group meetings occur at the same time as the Utility Commission meetings because they agreed that all of the Utility Commissioners should be involved in the process and that the stakeholder group should also include a water professional and resiliency professional who live in the City. Vice-Mayor YK Chalamcherla volunteered to be the City Council representative on the Stakeholder Group (if one was desired). Councilmember Sarah Aquino confirmed with staff that the funds used to pay for this process are Enterprise Funds and not General Fund.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 42 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

Book77 Page 50
Folsom Ci$ Council
February 28,2023
GITY MANAGER REPORTS:

City Manager Elaine Andersen announced that the traffic safety improvement project at Folsom Lake Crossing will begin in spring. She advised that the Waste and Recycling Division will begin conducting random, periodic audits of recycling cans to educate residents regarding recycling. She concluded with announcing that the Folsom Library has free State Park passes for checkouts.

COUNCIL GOMMENTS:

Councilmember Mike Kozlowski commented on topics discussed at SACOG and Sacramento Regional Transit Board meetings.

Councilmember Anna Rohrbough advised that she is attending a conference for economic development and will share findings from the conference at the next Council meeting.

Councilmember Sarah Aquino reported on topics discussed at the Sacramento Regional Sanitation District board meeting.

Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla spoke of his attendance at the Folsom Athletics Association annual general meeting and commended their volunteers. He encouraged residents who are water experts to reach out to the City to get involved.

Mayor Rosario Rodriguez thanked the senior students from St. Francis High School for attending the City Council meeting. She commented regarding the Council's Strategic Planning Workshop and announced the upcoming Live Performing Art Academy's Jazz Festival. The Mayor spoke of attending the Folsom Athletics Association annual general meeting and commented regarding the Choose Folsom Leadership Class. She commended Fire Chief Ken Cusano who participated in the Chief Challenge - Fill the Boots for Burns.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Rosario Rodriguez adjourned the meeting at 8:02 pm.

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 43 03/14/2023 Item No.6.

This page intentionally Ieft blsnk
to facilitote double- sided printtng .

CITY OF
FOLSOl\[

DISTINCTIVE BY NATUNE

03/14/2023 Item No.6.
i, i *,i ,"i 'l ; r.:1
! :lrill:.ri 5, i,1l: l:

Folsom Ctty Council
Staff rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10999 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 18-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources @UfR) Department identifies sewer infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through sewer master plans and ongoing sewer condition assessment programs. As a condition of the City's State permit for its wastewater collection system, the EWR Department is required to perform ongoing condition assessments on the wastewater system and correct any defects/deficiencies identified through this process.

Through these efforts, City staff identified the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station as needing rehabilitation or replacement.

This project involves the decommissioning of the existing, active Pump Station 3, installing a flow diversion structure, and other miscellaneous sewer system modifications. By modiffing the existing sewer infrastructure and installing the flow diversion structure, the small volume of flow that is sent to Pump Station 3 can be diverted to Pump Station 2 which will allow Pump Station 2 to run more efficiently. For potential emergency and operational purposes, the City will purchase and install a new trailer mounted portable bypass pump at the Pump Station 3 1 MEETING DATE: 3t1412023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10999 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement
(Contract No. 173-21 l8-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

03/14/2023 Item No.7.
facility. The portable bypass pump and existing ancillary equipment associated with Pump Station 3 will serve as a backup to Pump Station 2 in the event that Pump Station 2 needs to be taken out of service. This will allow the city to save the costs of r,ehabilitating the existing Pump Station 3 while increasing efficiency of Pump Station 2 and increasing the sewer systems operational flexibility.

This resolutionwill authorize the City Managerto execute AmendmentNo. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 lS-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No.3 Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $138,590.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of theFolsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firm West Yost & Associates, Inc. was one of the firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through this pre-qualification process. West Yost & Associates, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and experience of the project team. West Yost & Associates, Inc. is currently providing engineering design services for this project.

Services recommended to be provided by West Yost & Associates, Inc. include construction administration services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift StationNo.3 Project. The following describes the additional construction administration services that West Yost & Associates, Inc. will be performing:
o Construction Kickoff Meeting and Startup Assistance.
o Responses to contractor initiated Requests-for-Information (RFIs). o Submittal Review.
o Design Clarifications, Design Changes, and Change Order Assistance. o Site Visits.
o Construction Punch List Preparation.
o Preparation of Record Drawings.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute AmendmentNo. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 1S-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No.3 Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $138,590. 2 Page 46
03/14/2023 Item No.7.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The EWR Department recommends that the amendment be executed with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for $138,590, for a total contract amount of 5626,754. The Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No.3 Project is included in the Capital Improvement Plan with a Fiscal Year 2022-23 project budget of $2,724,674.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement andlor improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Qualrty Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), andior 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10999 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 1S-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
J Page 47
03/14/2023 Item No.7.

RESOLUTION NO. 10999

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-21 18-035) WITH WEST YOST & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE GREENBACK SEWER AND LIFT STATION NO. 3 PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City is currently implementing its Sanitary Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) which consists of condition assessment, as well as operation and system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the sanitary sewer collection system; and
WHEREAS, West Yost & Associates, Inc. by reason of their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and experience of the project team, are qualified to perform the construction administration services; and
WHEREAS, the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station Improvement Project was included in the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Wastewater Operating Fund (Fund 530) in the amount of $138,590 for this amendment; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 18-035) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project. Amendment No. 2 will be in the amount of $138,590 and the new total contract amount, including Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 is $626,754.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March2023,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10999
Page I of I Page 48
03/14/2023 Item No.7.
.:r!":.
: ,i :t .! ,::f i_ j,:\'f
l, r'tri: :ri! tr ::: ri 3:

Folsom City Council
Staff rt
RECOMMENDATION / COI]NCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11000 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-034) with Water Works Engineers, LLC for Design Services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EWR) Department identifies sewer infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through sewer master plans and ongoing sewer condition assessment programs. As part of the City's Sewer System Management Plan for its wastewater collection system, the EWR Department performs ongoing condition assessments on the wastewater system and corrects any defects/deficiencies identified through this process.

Through these efforts, Clty staff identified the Folsom Boulevard 27-inch Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Proj ect as needing improvements.

In July 2020, and December 2021through Resolution No. 10486 and Resolution No. I0752, City Council authorized an agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC to complete I00% design level plans and specifications. The proposed project involves the construction and operation of a parallel 2l-inch sewer line adjacent to the City's existing Z7-inch Folsom I
MEETING DATE: 3/t412022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT Resolution No. 11000 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement
(Contract No. 173-21 20-034) with Water Works Engineers, LLC for Design Services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-lnch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project)
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

03/14/2023 Item No.8.

Boulevard Trunk Sewer. The existing sewer line has potential near-term capacity concerns due to rain derived inflow and infiltration conditions, and in the long-term requires additional capacity to provide General Plan and ultimate build-out growth capacity.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-034) with Water Works Engineers, LLC for design services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project) for a not-to-exceed amount of $96,864.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 236 of the Folsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firm Water Works Engineers, LLC was one of the firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through this pre-qualification process. Water Works Engineers, LLC is currently providing engineering design and bid phase support services for this project.

Water Works Engineers, LLC was determined to provide the best value to the City based on their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and experience of the project team.

Services recommended to be provided by Water Works Engineers, LLC include construction administration services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project). The following describes the additional engineering services that Water Works Engineers, LLC will be performing:
o ProjectCoordination.
o Attend on-site pre-construction meeting and site inspection visits. o Respond to Request for Information (RFI's).
o Review Technical Submittals.
o Design modifications.
o Project change order support.
o Prepare record drawings to reflect as-built project conditions.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (ContractNo.lT3-2120-034) with Water Works Engineers for Design Services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project). Amendment No. 2 will be in the amount of $96,864 and the new total contract amount, including Amendment No. 2 is $484,999.
2 Page 50
03/14/2023 Item No.8.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project) is included in the Capital Improvement Plan with a Fiscal Year2022-23 project budget of $7,471,945. The EWR Department recommends that Amendment No. 2 to the agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20- 034) for design services be awarded to Water Works Engineers, LLC for an additional $96,864 for a new total contract not to exceed amount of $484,999. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Sewer Operating (Fund 530) and the Sewer Capital Fund (Fund 531) in Fiscal Year 2022-23.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Folsom Boulevard 27-lnch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP) was designed to avoid direct and indirect impacts to the environment. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15303 (d), the proposed project consists of construction and installation of a sewer line of reasonable length to serve the needs of the City of Folsom.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (b), the project will accommodate current flow conditions and provide redundancy to the existing sewer system in the City of Folsom. Each segment of the proposed project will be designed and constructed to avoid environmentally sensitive areas. The project design will place the pipeline mainly within roadways and as far away as possible from environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed new pipeline will be located on the same site as the existing public utilities pipeline. The overall design of the project has no significant impacts to the environment and will be exempt from CEQA review.

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11000 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (ContractNo. 173-21 20-034) with Water Works Engineers, LLC for Design Services for the Folsom Boulevard 27-Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project) Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
J Page 51
03/14/2023 Item No.8.

RESOLUTION NO. 11OOO

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-2L 20-034) WITH

WATER WORKS ENGINEERS, LLC FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE F'OLSOM BOULEVARD 27.INCH TRUNK SEWER PROJECT (SECAP PROJECT)
WHEREAS, the City is currently implementing its Sanitary Sewer System Management Plan which consists of condition assessment, as well as operation and system improvements; and WHEREAS, the City is continuing to update its System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan to identiff recommended system capacity improvements; and WHEREAS, the City has identified this project to help proactively ensure that future General Plan and Buildout sewer flow conditions are accounted for in the ultimate operation of the sanitary sewer collection system; and
WHEREAS, Water Works Engineers, LLC by reason of their past experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required engineering services for the project; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530) and the Sewer Capital Fund (Fund 531) in the amount of $96,864; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 2120-034) with Water Works Engineers, LLC for Design Services for the Folsom Boulevard 27- Inch Trunk Sewer Project (SECAP Project) in the amount of $96,864, bringing the new total contract amount, including Amendment No. 2 to $484,999.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14ft day of March2023,by the following roll-call vote AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1000
Page I of I Page 52
03/14/2023 Item No.8.
:. :.::ii.:j:i 9: .ri!:;!
Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort
MEETING DATE: 311412023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11001 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
(Contract No. 173-21 2l-006) with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and
Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11001 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute AmendmentNo. I to the Agreement (ContractNo.lT3-2I21-006) with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EWR) Department identifies sewer infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through sewer master plans and ongoing sewer condition assessment programs. As a condition of the City's State permit for its wastewater collection system, the EWR Department is required to perform ongoing condition assessments on the wastewater system and correct any defects/deficiencies identified through this process.

Through these efforts, City staff identified the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project in order to provide system redundancy, enhance the performance of the City's sewer force main and provide the City with operational flexibility during emergency conditions.

The Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project includes the installation of approximately 1,500 lineal feet of l2-inch sewer force main parallel to the existing force 1

03/14/2023 Item No.9.
main. The project also includes the installation of plug valves, potholing to verifu high points along the City's existing force main, replacing/relocating air release valves along the City's existing force main as necessary and the installation of various sewer appurtenances. These improvements will help provide system redundancy, enhance the performance of the City's sewer force main and provide the City with operational flexibility during emergency conditions.

This resolution will authoizethe City Manager to execute AmendmentNo. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 21-006) with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project and Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $88,785.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of theFolsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firm Inferrera Construction Management (ICM) Group, Inc. was one of the firms selected to provide these services for this type ofproject through this pre-qualification process.

ICM Group, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and experience of the project team.

Services recommended to be provided by ICM Group, Inc. include additional construction management and inspection services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project. An additional 603 hours of construction management and inspection services is required due to the following:
placement.
be able to construct the project outside of peak wet weather flows.

Pump Station wet well coating and associated bypass pumping.

Amendment No. 1 will allow ICM Group, Inc. to perform additional on-site inspection, project schedule tracking, materials testing, specialty inspection for the wet well coating and provide construction change order support.
2 Page 54
03/14/2023 Item No.9.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute AmendmentNo. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 2l-006) with Infenera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project and Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $88,785.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The EWR Department recommends that the amendment be executed with ICM Group, Inc for $88,785, for a total contract amount of $360,610. The Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project is included in the Capital Improvement Plan with a Fiscal Year 2022-23 project budget of $2,102,015 however an additional appropriation will be needed for this amendment. Staff is requesting an additional appropriation in the amount of $89,000 for a total project budget of $2,191,015. Sufficient funds are available in the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530) for the appropriation to be added to the Wastewater Operating Fund (Fund 530) in Fiscal Year 2022-23.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement andlor improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental quality Act as noted in Title l4 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), andlor 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11001 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 2l-006) with Infenera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project and Appropriation of Funds Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
J Page 55
03/14/2023 Item No.9.

RESOLUTION NO. 11001

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-2121-006) WITH INFERRERA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. FOR

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE OAK

AVENUE PUMP STATION PEAK WET WEATHER FLOW RELIEF PROJECT AND

APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City is currently implementing its Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) which consists of condition assessment, as well as operation and system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the sanitary sewer collection system; and
WHEREAS, Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. by reason of their past experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required construction management and inspection services for the project; and WHEREAS, the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project was included in the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan with a project budget of $2,102,015; and WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of funds in the amount of $89,000 is needed for a revised project budget of $2,191,015 and sufficient funds arc available in the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530) for this appropriation; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 2l-006) with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Oak Avenue Pump Station Peak Wet Weather Flow Relief Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $88,785 and a total contract amount of $360,610.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $89,000for this agreement. The appropriation will be from the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530), for a total project budget of$2,191,015.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14tr day of March2023,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

ResolutionNo. 11001
Page I of2 Page 56
03/14/2023 Item No.9.

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I l00l
Page2 ofZ Page 57
03/14/2023 Item No.9.

This page intentionally Ieft blank
to facilitote double- sided printtng .

FOLS()l\{
CI?Y OF
DI9TIXCTIVE EY NATURE

03/14/2023 Item No.9.
t, .jf!tr'1i;. a, ,..irii ':

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort
MEETING DATE: 311412022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT Resolution No. 11002 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products for the Supply of Sodium
Hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant and Appropriation of Funds
F'ROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11002 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products for the Supply of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom receives 100% of its water supply from Folsom Lake. The City's Water Treatment Plant treats up to 50 million gallons per day of this supply to provide potable water to its customers. To meet the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water standards, the water treatment process uses a combination of flocculation/sedimentation pretreatment, conventional gravity media filters, and disinfection. An essential chemical for the disinfection process is sodium hypochlorite.

In September 2020,through Resolution No. 10518 the City Council approved execution of an agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products (Olin) to supply sodium hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant for a five-year period. In July 2022, Olin requested relief for the remainder of the contract terms, providing documentation detailing the limited supply and rising costs of raw materials, in addition to increases in the costs of both chemical 1

03/14/2023 Item No.10.
manufacturing and fuel. Based on this understanding, Olin has continued to supply sodium hypochlorite to the Water Treatment Plant, but in just the past year, the price of Sodium Hypochlorite, which cost $0.839 per gallon in early 2022has almost tripled to 52.37 per gallon in early 2023. Funding needed for the purchase of necessary chemicals has therefore exceeded the amounts anticipated at the time that the budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 was prepared.

In an effort to reduce overall chemical costs, the City is participating with a cooperative group of public agencies through the Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC) which develops regional chemical bid documents each year. The regional bid documents allow these water purveyors to leverage larger chemical volumes under one bid to reduce costs. Through this process, Olin Corporation has provided the lowest responsive and responsible bid for providing sodium hypochlorite for use at the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products for the supply of sodium hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant and Appropriation of Funds.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 236 of the Folsom Municipal Code, contracts for supplies costing $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
On January 26,2023, the BACC completed the regional chemical bid documents and publicly advertised for bids. The following bids were received by BACC on February 23,2023,relating to supply of sodium hypochlorite for the City of Folsom:

Contractor Weiehted Averase Bid Price
Olin Corporation $2.89 per gallon
Univar Solutions USA Inc. $3.31 per eallon
Hasa,Inc $2.94 per sallon
As delivery sizes and locations vary by agency, the successful bidders are chosen based on a weighted average bid price for the chemical. The weighted average bid price includes the volume of product purchased and the travel distance for delivery to each agency. Olin Corporation was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for the supply of sodium hypochlorite to the City of Folsom.

The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products for the purchase of sodium hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant. 2

03/14/2023 Item No.10.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The table below summarizes the anticipated volume of sodium hypochlorite required at the Water Treatment Plant, and associated costs.

Chemical
Remainder
of FY 22-23 FY 23,24 Total
Volume required (gallons) 55,000 135.000 190,000
Cost @ $2.89 per sallon $158,950 $390,1 50 $549,100
Purchase of sodium hypochlorite through the remainder of FY 22-23 will require an additional appropriation of $160,000. There are sufficient funds available in the Water Fund (Fund 520) foi tfiis appropriation from fund balance. This agreement will also be included as part of the FY 23 -24 budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as it is related to Section 15301, Existing Facilities.

ATTACHMENT
ResolutionNo. 11002 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Olin Corporation, DBA Olin Chlor Alkali Products for the Supply of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant and Appropriation of Funds Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director
Environmental and Water Resources
J

03/14/2023 Item No.10.

RESOLUTION NO. 11002

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH OLIN CORPORATION, DBA OLIN CHLOR ALKALI

PRODUCTS FOR THE SUPPLY OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FOR THE WATER

TREATMENT PLANT AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, sodium hypochlorite is an essential chemical to each phase of the City's water treatment plant operation; and
WHEREAS, the City coordinated with the Bay Area Chemical Coalition to develop a regional bid for sodium hypochlorite; and
WHEREAS, on February 23,2023, the Bay Area Chemical Coalition received bids for sodium hypochlorite; and
WHEREAS' Olin Corporation was the lowest responsible, responsive bidder; and WHEREAS' an appropriation in the amount of $160,000 is needed for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2022-23 andfunds are available in the Water Fund (Fund 520); and WHEREAS' this agreement will also be included in the budget process for the FY 23-24 budget; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Olin Corporation for the Supply of Sodium Hypochlorite for an amount not-to-exceed $549,100.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate an additional $160,000 in the Water Fund (Fund 520) for this agreement. pASSED AND ADOPTED this 14ft day of March2023,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

ATTEST:

Resolution No. I1002
Page I of2
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR

03/14/2023 Item No.10.

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1002
Page2 of2 Page 63
03/14/2023 Item No.10.

This page intentionally left blank
to focilitate double- sided printing .

CITY OF
FOLSOl\{
DI9TINCTIVE BY NAIURE

03/14/2023 Item No.10.
_:i!;:r
.t'j.!: !f,,,,:'({
' r 1t
tr:.1t i r r,;5.i a,: ! ., t1. !:

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

ON / CITY ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11003 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds'

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EWR) Department identifies water infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through waster master plans, ongoing water condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. EWR staff completed an analysis of potential Water Treatment Plant capacity and reliability projects. Through these efforts, EWR staff identified the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project as a priority project.

There are two Reclaimed Backwash (RBW) ponds (RBW #1 and RBW #2) at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) that store backwash water, which is water used to clean the frlters. This backwash water can be recycled back to the headworks of the WTP. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) allows water agencies to recycle up to 10% of the backwash water based on the water treatment plant capacity. The WTP's current firm capacity I
MEETING DATE: 3n412023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11003 - A Resolution Authorizing the Ctty Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
(Contract No. 173-21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

03/14/2023 Item No.11.
is 50 million gallons per day (MGD), and |0o/o of the current firm capacity, or 5.0 MGD of backwash water, can be recycled back into the system. This project will increase redundancy and reliability to allow for I\Yo of the firm capacity, or 5.0 MGD of backwash water, to be recycled back into the WTP system. Currently, the infrastructure can only recycle 3.5 MGD.

Additionally, increasing the recycled water capacity greatly reduces the City's risk for the RBW ponds to potentially overflow.

The current piping configuration at the inlet of the RBW ponds only feeds RBW #2. This project will upgrade the piping alrangement to feed either RBW #1 or RBW #2with isolation valves. Having this operational flexibility in feeding either pond will allow for the maintenance and cleaning of one pond at a time, while the other pond is still operating. This project also involves upgrading the submersible pumps in the decant pump station (DPS) at the outlet of the RBW ponds to meet the peak flow of approximately 5.0 MGD. Additionally, the DPS control system will be upgraded to provide improved operational controls and flexibility. The DPS wet well also has aging and leaking slide gates that will be replaced.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. I to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $38,681 and appropriation of funds.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council

ANALYSIS
In October 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firm HDR Engineering, Inc. was one of the firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through this pre-qualification process. HDR Engineering, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and experience of the project team.

In May 2022, the City of Folsom entered into an agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide engineering services (including design and construction administration services) for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project for a not-to- exceed amount of $60,060. This initial work included project management during construction, participation in the pre-construction meeting, submittal reviews, responses to Requests for Information (RFI), site visits, construction meetings, contract change order support, etc.

During the initial phase of construction, unknown existing underground utilities were discovered which require additional engineering and construction support to develop solutions 2 Page 66
03/14/2023 Item No.11.
to work around these utilities. In addition to the unknown utilities, RBW # 2 did not have a concrete bottom to the basin as originally shown on previous as-built plans, which requires different pipe alignment alternatives to be considered and designed. Amendment No. I is for additionai enginiering services for design and construction administration. Services recommended to be provided by HDR Engineering, Inc. include the following:
o Project Management During Construction: extended construction contract duration and additional contractor coordination.
o Review of additional RFls and Submittals.
o Additional Site Visits and Construction Meetings.
o Additional design services for three alternatives due to the unknown underground utilities and existing RBW conditions.
o Additional time allocated to Project Management, Submittal reviews, RFI reviews, or alternative design review.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. I to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $38,681.

F'INAN IMPACT
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends that the amendment be executed with HDR Engineering, Inc. for $38,681 for a total contract amount of $98,741. The Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project is included in the Capital Improvement Plan with a Fiscal Year 2022-2023 project budget of $2,380,025. The project budget will require an additional appropriation in the amount of $44,975 in order to acctmmodut. thir amendment. This will bring the total project budget up to 52,425,000.

Sufficient funds are available in both the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and the Water Capital,Fund (Fund 521) for the appropriation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the Cahfornia Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental q*tity Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), and/or 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
5 Page 67
03/14/2023 Item No.11.

Resolution No. 11003 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc' for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds
Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
4 Page 68
03/14/2023 Item No.11.

RESOLUTION NO. 11003

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. I TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-2122-029) WITH HDR ENGINEERING,INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE WATER

TREATMENT PLANT BACKWASH AND RECYCLED WATER UPGRADES

PROJECT AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has identified this project as a priority to maintain the integrity and operation of the water treatment system; and WHEREAS, HDR Engineering, Inc. by reason of their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and-experience of the project team, are qualified to perform the required additional engineering design services and construction administration services; and WHEREAS, the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades project was included in the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan with a project budget of $2,380,025; and
WHEREAS, an additional appropriation in the amount of $44,975 is needed for this amendment which will increase the project budget to $2,425,000 and sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for the appropriation; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 22-029) with HDR Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $38,681 and a total contract amount of $98,741.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $44,975 for this agreement. The appropriation will be from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and Water Capital Fund (Fund 521), for a total project budget of $2,425,000. pASSED AND ADOPTED this 14ft day of March,2023,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Resolution No. 11003
Page I of2 Page 69
03/14/2023 Item No.11.

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1003
Page2 of2 Page 70
03/14/2023 Item No.11.
i l+i'-,1 i\.l
{ .,riia.i!it l.} t.1r:'i:

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort
MEETING DATE: 311412023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11004 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with McGuire and Hester, Inc. for the Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street Friction Enhancement Proj ect
FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. I 1004 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with McGuire and Hester, Inc. for the Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street Friction Enhancement Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Public Works Department is responsible for the operation, safety, and maintenance of roadways throughout Folsom. In June 2021, a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) was developed, which is a data-driven report that systematically identifies and analyzes roadway safety issues and recommends improvements. The LRSP utilized accident data between 2015 and2019 to determine locations and causes of traffic accidents, allowing engineers to implement specific countermeasures to address the causes of accidents, leading to a safer roadway network for vehicles, bicycle, and pedestrians.

The LRSP identified two specific locations, one on Folsom Lake Crossing between Folsom Dam Road and the Johnny Cash Trail entrance, and another on East Natoma Street between Folsom Lake Crossing and Gionata Way, that would benefit from the installation of median barriers and dynamic radar speed feedback signs. Utilizing the data and recommendations from the LRSP, the city was successful in receiving Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds for those improvements. That project is currently in design with an anticipated 1

03/14/2023 Item No.12.
construction date of May 2023.

These two sections of roadway have recently experienced an increase of wet-weather related traffic accidents. After reviewing the collision reports, available traffic camera footage, and consultation with the Folsom Police Department Traffic Division, staff made the determination to install a Rubberized Open-Grade Friction Course (OGFC). OGFC is a type of asphalt that increases the friction of the roadway, reduces the potential for hydroplaning and reduces tire spray allowing for higher visibility during rain events. OGFC is approved for use by Caltrans, and the city has previously installed OGFC on Glenn Drive, successfully reducing the number of wet weather-related traffic accidents.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
Public Works staff prepared the bid package and publicly advertised the project on January 13, 2023. Bids were received on February 2,2023.

The six bids received are as follows:
o McGuire and Hester, Inc.
o Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt
o All Phase Construction and Engineering, Inc
o Vintage Paving Company,Inc.
o B&M Builders, Inc.
o Martin Brothers Construction, Inc.
$456,500
$496,669
$499,150
$515,235
$546,795
s643,975
The Engineer's Estimate for this project was $500,000. The Public Works Department has found the bids to be in order and recommends that the contract be awarded to the low-bidder, McGuire and Hester, Inc. Staff will use the City's standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FINAN IMPACT
The contract with McGuire and Hester, Inc. would be authorized for $456,500 with the total project budget of $502,150, which includes a ten percent contingency amount of $45,650 for potential change orders.

Funds in the amount of $502,150 are budgeted and available in the Street Overlay/Pavement Management Project, Project No. 8017, utilizing Measure A funds (Fund 276) and SBl, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation funds (Fund 235) fot Fiscal Year 2022-23. 2 Page 72
03/14/2023 Item No.12.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project has been deemed Categorically Exempt from California Environmental Quality nct (-CpQn) environmental review based on Class l: Existing Facilities (c) 2 - Resurfacing and patching of streets.

ATT

1. Resolution No. 11004 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with McGuire and Hester, Inc. for the Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street Friction Enhancement Project
Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
J Page 73
03/14/2023 Item No.12.

RESOLUTION NO. 11004

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH MCGUIRE AND HESTER,INC. FOR THE

FOLSOM LAKE CROSSING AND EAST NATOMA STREET FRICTION

ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department desires to construct a Rubberized Open-Grade Friction Course asphalt overlay on Folsom Lake Crossing between 900 feet west of Folsom Dam Road and the Johnny Cash Trail entrance, and on East Natoma Street between Folsom Lake Crossing and Gionata Way; and
WHEREAS, this project is an engineering countermeasure to a recent increase in wet- weather related traffic accidents at both project locations; and WHEREAS, Public Works staff prepared the bid package, publicly advertised the project and received bids on February 2,2023,with McGuire and Hester, Inc. being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, funds in the amount of $502,150, which includes a contingency of $45,650, are budgeted and available in the Street Overlay/Pavement Management Project, Project No. 801 7, utilizing Measure A funds (Fund 27 6) and SB 1 , Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation funds (Fund 235) for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a construction agreement with McGuire and Hester, Inc. for the Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street Friction Enhancement in the amount of $456,500, with a total not-to-exceed project budget of $502,150, which includes a ten percent contingency amount of $45,650.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this 14ft day of March2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11004

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR

03/14/2023 Item No.12.
ai .::,!.:rit t. t i!ai .;
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 3lt4/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT Resolution No. 11005 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11005 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EUfR) Department identifies sewer infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through sewer master plans and ongoing sewer condition assessment programs. As a condition of the City's State permit for its wastewater collection system, the EWR Department is required to perform ongoing condition assessments on the wastewater system and correct any defects/deficiencies identified through this process. Through these efforts, City staff identified the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station as needing rehabilitation or replacement.

This project involves the decommissioning of the existing, active Pump Station 3, installing a flow diversion structure, and other miscellaneous sewer system modifications. By modifring the existing sewer infrastructure and installing the flow diversion structure, the small volume of flow that is sent to Pump Station 3 canbe diverted to Pump Station 2 which will allow Pump Station 2 to run more efficiently. For potential emergency and operational pu{poses, the City will purchase and install a new trailer mounted portable bypass pump at the Pump Station 3 facility. The portable bypass pump and existing ancillary equipment associated with Pump Station 3 will serve as a

03/14/2023 Item No.13.
backup to Pump Station 2 inthe event that Pump Station 2 needs to be taken out of service. This will allow the city to save the costs of rehabilitating the existing Pump Station 3 while increasing efficiency of Pump Station 2 and increasing the sewer systems operational flexibility.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $544,764.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 236 of the Folsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firms Inferrera Construction Management (ICM) Group, Inc., Psomas, and West Yost & Associates, Inc. were among a group of firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through this previously completed pre-qualifi cation process.

On January 19, 2023, the City requested proposals from consultants to provide construction management services consisting of full-time, on-site inspection, project schedule tracking, review and/or coordination of project submittals, coordination with the other on-going City construction projects, labor compliance review, customer coordination, materials testing, and overall owner representation throughout construction of the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No.3 Project. On February 17,2023, EWR received proposals from ICM Group, Inc., Psomas, and West Yost & Associates, Inc.

The proposals were evaluated by three EWR staff members for technical evaluation prior to reviewing project costs. The proposals were reviewed and scored for project understanding, project team staffing, and recent relevant experience. The technical evaluations were scored as shown in Table l.

Consultant EWR 1 EWR 2 EWR 3 Total Average
ICM Group.Inc 55 60.5 53 168.5 s6.2
Psomas 58 58 55 17l 57.0
West Yost & Associates, Inc 68 66 70 206 68.7
Table 1: Consultqnt Technical Scores without Costs
After reviewing each proposal for project understanding, project team staffing, and recent relevant project experience, the proposals were reviewed for project costs. The fee schedules for the scope of work outlined in the request for proposal from each consultant are shown inTable 2. 2 Page 76
03/14/2023 Item No.13.

Consultant Fee Amount
ICM Group.Inc s499,443.00
Psomas $596,181.00
West Yost & Associates, Inc. s544,764.00
Table 2: Consultant Project Costs
West Yost & Associates, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on the fee amount, past municipal project experience involving work of similar scope and complexity including staff coordination and technical knowledge and expertise for these types of projects.

West Yost & Associates, Inc. included a detailed and thorough project understanding compared to the other two consultants for this project. Table 3 shows the overall total scores including project costs based on a maximum score of 100.

Consultant Technical
Score (Avs.)
Cost Score Total Score
ICM Group,Inc. s6.2 25.0 8t.2
Psomas 57.0 20.9 77.9
West Yost & Associates, Inc. 68.7 22.7 91.4
Tqble 3: Consultqnt Overall Scoring Including Proiect Costs This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection services during construction for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No.3 Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $544,764.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Greenback Sewer and Lift StationNo.3 Project is included inthe Fiscal Year2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan with a total project budget of $2,724,674. Sufficient funds are available in the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530) and the EWR Department recommends that the contract be awarded to West Yost & Associates, Inc. for not-to-exceed amount of $544,764.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement andlor improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - Califomia Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), and/or 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. I 1005 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection services for the Greenback Sewer & Lift Station No.3 Project
J Page 77
03/14/2023 Item No.13.

Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
4 Page 78
03/14/2023 Item No.13.

RESOLUTION NO. 11005

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WrTH WEST YOST & ASSOCTATES,INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES F'OR THE GREENBACK SEWER AND LIFT STATION NO. 3 PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City is currently implementing its Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) which consists of condition assessment, as well as operation and system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the sanitary sewer collection system; and
WHEREAS, West Yost & Associates, Inc. by reason of their past experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required construction management and inspection services for the project; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530) in the amount of $544,764; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project for a not-to-exceed amount of 5544,764; and
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14ft day of March2023,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11005
Page I of I Page 79
03/14/2023 Item No.13.

This pnge intentionally Ieft blqnk
to focilitqte double- sided printing .

CITY OF
FOLSON{
DIsTI}ICTIVE BY NA?UBE

03/14/2023 Item No.13.

Jt;'{6l.,ss-$$:?
r,: slttiglr€ .a'r&t*Jt,
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNEIL AEIIQN
Move to introduce and conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 1337 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan (Introduction and First Reading).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On February 15,2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a request from Lewis Management Corporation for approval of a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, Development Agreement Amendment, and Minor Administrative Modification for development of a 238-unit market-rate apartment community on a 15.8-acre site situated at the northwest comer of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive within the Folsom Plan Area. The Planning Commission staff report and associated Conditions of Approval are included at Attachment 3 to this staff report. 1 MEETING DATE: 3n412023
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Folsom Ranch Apartments Development Agreement
Amendment - Northwest corner of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive (MSTR 22-218)
Ordinance No. 1337 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 2 to the First
Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement
between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial
Properties, LLC relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan (Introduction and First Reading)
FROM: Community Development Department

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

The Planning Commission was fully supportive of the proposed apartment project and adopted a motion (7-0-0-0) to approve a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Development Permit and Minor Administrative Modification for the Folsom Ranch Apartments project.

The Commission also recommended that the City Council Approve Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties,LLC relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan.

The Planning Commission was fully supportive of the proposed apartment project and adopted a motion (7-0-0-0) to approve a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Development Permit and Minor Administrative Modification for the Folsom Ranch Apartments project.

The Commission also moved to recommend that the City Council Approve Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties,LLC relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan.

POLICY / RULE
As set forth in the State Planning andZoninglaw, approval of, or amendments to, a Development Agreement is a legislative act which requires approval by the City Council following review and recommendation by the Planning Commission.

PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS
As noted above, the applicant requested approval of three entitlements to allow for development of the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project.

The first entitlement requested was for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for development and operation of a of paired, townhome-style apartment buildings on the project site. This entitlement was approved by the Planning Commission on February 15, 2023.

The second entitlement was a request for approval of a Planned Development Permit to establish project-specific development standards, review the project site design, evaluate the architectural design of the multi-family apartment buildings and clubhouse, and establish signage criteria. This entitlement was approved by the Planning Commission on February 15,2023.

The third entitlement was a request for approval of a Minor Administrative Modification for the transfer of development rights to move 22I lll4HD units from the project site to Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan Area, to move 116 MMD units from Parcel 61 to the project site, and to move 3.3-acres of parkland (PARK) from the project site to Parcel 61. This entitlement was approved by the Planning Commission on February 15,2023.

The fourth entitlement requested was for approval of a Development Agreement Amendment (Amendment No. 2) to the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC relative to the Folsom 2 Page 82
03/14/2023 Item No.14.

South Specific Plan. The pu{pose of this Amendment is to deed restrict 64 affordable housing units on a remainder portion of Parcel 61 located within in the Folsom Plan Area owned by Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC. The purpose of the Amendment is also to memorialize that the landowner will receive credits for a total of 64 deed-restricted multi- family housing units and that these Affordable Housing Credits may be transferred to and used to satisfu andlor offset the inclusionary andlor affordable housing obligation for other residential projects on specific parcels owned by Eagle Commercial Properties in the Folsom Plan Area. The Planning Commission voted on FebrualY 15, 2023 to recommend that the Cify Council approve the proposed amendment to the development agreement.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Folsom Ranch Apartments project, which includes development of 119 two-story townhome-style apartment buildings and aone-story clubhouse building, is comprised of 238 market-rate apartments within a gated community. The two-story apartment buildings include a total of 104 two-bedroom units (1,175 square feet) and 134 three-bedroom units (1,611 tol,S2gsquarefeet). Allapartmentunitsareproposedtobeaccessiblefromexterior doorways and include a full kitchen, living space, washer/dryer, storage closets, bedrooms, bathrooms, and an outdoor balcony/patio. The one-story clubhouse building features a fitness studio, an office, a reception lounge, an equipment room, and restroom facilities.

Outdoor amenities associated with the clubhouse building include a pool, a spa, sun deck, seating areas, barbecue areas, tot lot, and a dog park.

In relation to site design, the torrynhome-style apartment buildings are distributed evenly throughout the project site, with the clubhouse building, tot lot, and dog park being situated in the-northem portion of the project site. With respect to architectural style, the proposed project features a contemporary Spanish Colonial design theme featuring stucco exteriors, tile roofs, wood trim, decorative iron detailing, and an earthtone color scheme.

Primary vehicle access to the project site includes two new driveways, both located on the west side of Westwood Drive respectively. The two primary access driveways will accommodate all turning movements into and out of the project site. Emergency vehicle access is provided by a gated driveway on the east side of McCarthy Way and a gated driveway on the west side of Placerville Road. Proposed internal vehicle circulation consists of a series of 27-foot-wide drive aisles that provide access in and around the project site.

Pedestrian circulation is provided by new sidewalks located along the street frontages of Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, McCarthy Way, Mercy Drive, and Placerville Road, with seven pedestrian gates providing access from the project site to the adjacent sidewalks.

Internal pedestrian circulation is accommodated by a series of new pedestrian pathways that provide connectivity to the apartment buildings, the clubhouse building, and the perimeter sidewalks. Additional site improvements include: 597 parking spaces (includes combination of garage and uncovered parking spaces), bicycle parking spaces, electric vehicle charging stations, underground utilities, drainage swales, site lighting, site landscaping, retaining walls, fencing, and project identification signs.

J Page 83
03/14/2023 Item No.14.

The project was evaluated by the Planning Commission at their February 15,2023 meeting.

No members of the public spoke regarding the proposed project during the public comment portion of the meeting. The Planning Commission indicated that they were fully supportive of a market rate rental community at this specific location in the Folsom Plan Area and adopted a motion (7-0-0-0) to Approve a Conditional Use Permit, Approve a Planned Development Permit, and Approve a Minor Administrative Modification for the Folsom Ranch Apartments project. The Commission also recommended that the City Council Approve Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan. It is important to note that the applicant (Lewis Management Corporation) was in agreement to the "green sheet" modifications (Attachment 4) proposed at the Planning Commission meeting and has not objected to nor filed an appeal on any ofthe conditions ofapproval placed on the project.

ANAI ,YSIS
The City and Landowner's predecessor (Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC) previously entered into the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement By and Between the City of Folsom and Landowner Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan on July 15, 2014. Section 1.5 of the Restated Development Agreement allows the Restated Development Agreement to be amended from time to time by mutual written consent of the parties. On November 12,2015, Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC and the City entered into Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan. The applicant is proposing Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan for the purpose of deed restricting 64 affordable housing units on a portion of the Remainder within Parcel 61 located within in the Folsom Plan Area.

As described above, the Landowner is proposing to deed restrict 64 multi-family housing units on a portion of the Remainder within Parcel 61, located within in the Folsom Plan Area, for the purpose of assisting the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) assigned by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. The 64 multi-family housing units, which would be made available to low-, very-low, and/or extremely-low income households, will be deed restricted for a period of 55 years from the date of recording. The deed restriction must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the Folsom Ranch Apartments Project.

In exchange for perfecting the deed restriction, the landowner will receive credits for a total of 64 deed-restricted multi-family housing units. In the event that Landowner (or a successor in interest) proposes residential development on Parcel 61 in the future, any applicable requirement for inclusionary andlor affordable housing will be offset by 64 units.

Alternatively, the Affordable Housing Credits may be transferred to and used to satisff and/or offset the inclusionary andlor affordable housing obligation for other residential projects owned by Eagle Commercial Properties on Parcels 77,85A-3, or 854-4 in the Folsom Plan Area.
4 Page 84
03/14/2023 Item No.14.

There is no inclusionary or affordable housing requirement applicable to the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project. In the unlikely event that the City passes an inclusionary housing ordinance applicable to rental units, the proposed project would be subject to it, unless a complete application for a building permit is submitted before the new ordinance takes effect.

Staff recommends that the form of deed restriction be submitted with owner/applicant's application for a building permit and will be subject to the City Afiorney's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Condition No. 7 is included to reflect this requirement.

City staff has conducted a thorough review of the proposed modifications to the Development Agreement and is supportive of the Development Agreement amendment as proposed by the applicant.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impact is anticipated with approval of the Development Agreement Amendment associated with the Folsom Ranch Apartments Project as the project will not result in any change in the total amount of commercial square footage or residential unit count within the Folsom Plan Area.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A CEQA Exemption and Streamlining Analysis and Checklist was prepared for the Folsom Ranch Apartments Project in October,2022 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City reviewed the applicant's analysis and concurred that the project is exempt from additional environmental review as provided in CEQA Guidelines 15182(c).

On February 15,2023,the Planning Commission found that the project was exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section65457 and CEQA Guidelines section 151S2(c). The Development Agreement Amendment was considered by staff and the Planning Commission as a part of the determination that the project is exempt. No additional environmental review is required.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 1337 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan (First Reading and Introduction)

2. AmendmentNo. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan

3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated February 15,2023

4. Planning Commission Green Sheet Modifications, dated February 15,2023 5 Page 85
03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director
6 Page 86
03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Attachment 1
Ordinance No. 1337 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 2 to the First
Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement
between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan
(Introduction and First Reading)

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

ORDINANCE NO. 1337

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND EAGLE

COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC RELATIVE TO THE FOLSOM SOUTH

SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan was prepared and certified by the City Council on June 11, 2011, and the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission approved the City's annexation of the Folsom Plan Area on January 18,2012;' and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority in Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the Government Code, the City Council, following a duly notified public hearing on June 28,2011, approved the Tier 1 Development Agreement relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan (Tier I DA) for the development of the Folsom Plan Area by adopting Ordinance No. 1149 on July 12, 2071; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, following a duly noticed public hearing on May 27,2014, approved a request to amend the Tier I DA to the development of the Westland/Eagle Project by approving a First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement (ARDA) between the City and the developer of the Westland/Eagle Project, Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC, by adopting Ordinance No. 1204 on June I0,2014; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, following a duly noticed public hearing on September 22, 2075, approved a request to amend the ARDA to the development of the Westland/Eagle Project by approving AmendmentNo. 1 to ARDA between the City and the developer of the Westland/Eagle Project, Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC,by adopting Ordinance No. 1237 on October 13,2015; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments Project consists of the development of a 238-unit market rate apartment community on a 15.8-acre site situated at the northwest corner of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive within the Folsom Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, the City and the landowner of the Folsom Ranch Apartments project site (Parcels 854-3 and 854-4) and Folsom Plan Area Parcels 61 and 77 desire to further amend the ARDA in order to deed restrict 64 multi-family housing units on a remainder portion of Parcel 6l for development of low-, very-low, andlor extremely-low income households; and WHEREAS' the Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on February 15,2023, considered Amendment No. 2tothe First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties,LLC relative Ordinance No. 1337
Page I of3 Page 88
03/14/2023 Item No.14.
to the Folsom South Specific Plan at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, and recommended that the City Council approve said AmendmentNo' 2; and WHEREAS' all notices have been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and the Folsom Municipal Code.

NOW, THEREFORE'the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1 FINDINGS
A. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

B. The Amendment No. 2 to lhe.First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the City's General Plan and the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

C. The Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices.

D. The Amendment No. 2 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the immediate area, nor be detrimental or injurious to property or persons in the general neighborhood or to the general welfare of the residents of the City as a whole.

E. The Amendment No. 2 will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation ofproperty values.

F. The Amendment No. 2 has been prepared in accordance with, and is consistent with, Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5, and City Council ResolutionNo. 2370.

G. All notices have been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and the Folsom Municipal Code.

H. The Amendment No. 2 is consistent with the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan certified by the City Council on June 11,2011, which is incorporated herein by reference. None of the events in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines exists which warrant the preparation of a subsequent EIR or supplemental EIR.

Ordinance No. 1337
Page2 of3 Page 89
03/14/2023 Item No.14.

SECTION 2 APPROVAL OF'AMEI\DMENT TO DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT
The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC on behalf of the City after the effective date of this Ordinance.

SECTION 3 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the r"-uinittg portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council declares that it would have pasied each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective' SECTION 4 DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in fullor in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.

This Ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on March 14,2023 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on March 28,2023.

On a motion by Council Member seconded by Council Member the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this 28no duy of March 2023, by the following roll-call vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriquez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1337

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Attachment2
Amendment No .2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement between the City of Folsom and
Eagle Commercial Properties relative to the
Folsom South Specific Plan

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE $6103

RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY CLERK
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Folsom
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
No. 1") is entered into this day of
Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC,
of Sections 65864 through 65869.
a Delaware limited liability company ("Landowner"), pursuant to the authority 5 of the Government Code of California.
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESER 'S USE)
AMENDMENT NO. 2TO F'IRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND EAGLE COMMERCIAL PARTNERS, LLC

RELATIVE TO THE FOLSOM SOUTH SPECIF'IC PLAN
This Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement ("Amendment _,2023, by and between the City of Folsom ("City") and

RECITALS
A. ARDA. City and Landowner entered into that certain First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan recorded on July 15, 2014, in the Official Records of the County Recorder of Sacramento County in Book 20140715 on Page 0517 (the "ARDA").

B. Amendment No. 1 to ARDA. City and Landowner entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan recorded on January 29,2016, in the Official Records of the County Recorder of Sacramento County in Book 20160129 on Page 0385 ("Amendment No. l" and collectively with the ARDA, the "Development Agreement").

C. Propetv. This Amendment No. 2 affects certain of the Property (as defined in the Development Agreement), which portions of the Property are described in Exhibit "B-1" and shown in Exhibit "B-2" to this Amendment No. 2 ("Amendment No. 2 Property")'
D. Purpose of Amendment No. 2. The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to include certain additional entitlements within the scope and definition of Entitlements (as defined in the Development Agreement) and define Landowner's affordable housing obligations with respect to the Property as described in this AmendmentNo.2.

E. Hearines. On February 15, 2023, the City Planning Commission, designated as the planning agency for purposes of development agreement review pursuant to Government Code Section 65867, in a duly noticed and conducted public hearing, considered this Amendment No. 2 andrecommended that the City Council approve the same.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

F with General Plan and Plan. Having duly examined and considered this Amendment No. 2, the City finds and declares that this Amendment No. 2 is consistent with the General Plan and the Specific Plan, as amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, the parties hereto do hereby agree to amend the Development Agreement as follows:

1. Amendment of Development Agreement.
a. The term Entitlements (as defined in the Development Agreement) is hereby revised to add the following:
i. This Amendment No. 2 as approved by Ordinance No.
b. A new Section 1.7 is hereby added to the Development Agreement as follows:
c.

Anticipated Chanses to the City's Inclusionary Housins Ordinance. The City has amended its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Folsom Municipal Code Chapter

17.104) by Ordinance No. 1243 to eliminate Second Dwelling Units (also referred to as "granny flats") as an altemative means of meeting the City's inclusionary housing requirements. Landowner acknowledges there is no vested right to use this alternative means for meeting the City's inclusionary housing requirements and that this alternative shall not be available to Landowner from and after the effective date of Ordinance No. 1243 . Landowner further acknowledges those certain amendments to Section 65850 of the California Govemment Code (specifically, subsection 65350(g)), effective January 1, 2018, which allow for the implementation of inclusionary housing requirements in residential rental units, upon adoption of an ordinance by the City. In lhe event the City amends its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance with respect to rental housing pursuant to Section 65850(g) and such amendments are applicable to the Property and effective prior to Landowner (or a successor in interest) submitting a complete application for its first building permit for a residential rental project on Parcel 61, Parcel 77,Parcel854-3 or Parcel 854-4, Landowner agrees the Properly shall be subject to such amendments.

A new Section 3.14 is hereby added to the Development Agreement as follows:

Satisfaction Affordable Housins Credits. Landowner shall create and record a deed restriction against a certain portion ofthe Property within Parcel 61 as described in Exhibit '68-1" and depicted on "Exhibit B-2" to this Amendment No. 2 to restrict use of such property to affordable housing pu{poses only ("Affordable Housing Parcel"). Said deed restriction shall require the Affordable Housing Parcel to include 64 deed-restricted multi-family housing units available for low-, very-low, and/or extremely-low income households (as those terms are defined in Sections 50079.5,50093, 50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code), which shall remain in place for at least 55 years from the date of recording. The 64 units are anticipated to be located on a site of approximately 2.5 acres but no more than 3 acres with MHD zoning that is expected to accommodate

03/14/2023 Item No.14.
25 to 35 units per acre. A large lot parcel map will be processed through the City to create the ultimate deed restricted Affordable Housing Parcel. A site plan will be submitted with the Large Lot Parcel Map to verifr that the deed restricted affordable parcel is sized to accommodate the 64 affordable units. The Affordable Housing Parcel will be located within a portion of Parcel 61 shown and designated as the Remainder on Parcel Map PN 2I-043 filed for record on October 12,202I in Book 245 ofParcel Maps at Page 2inthe official records of Sacramento County' Said deed restriction shall be in a form reasonably approved by City and shall be recorded against the Affordable Housing Parcel upon creation of the same and prior to issuance of a building permit for any portion of Parcel 85A-3 or 854-4 within the Property. Unless City amends its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as described in Section 1.7 prior to Landowner (or a successor in interest) submitting a complete application for its first building permit for a residential rental project on Parcel 61, Landowner's compliance with this Section shall fully satisff Landowner's obligations with respect to inclusionary andlor affordable housing under the General Plan Housing Element, Specific Plan, Folsom Municipal Code, and Entitlements for any residential rental project on Parcel 61. In the event (i) City amends its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as described in Section 1.7 prior to Landowner (or a successor in interest) submitting a complete application for its first building permit for a residential rental project on Parcel 61 or (ii) Landowner (or a successor in interest) proposes a for-sale residential project on Parcel 61, then Landowner's compliance with this Section shall instead offset Landowner's obligations with respect to inclusionary and/or affordable housing under the General Plan Housing Element, Specific Plan, Folsom Municipal Code, and Entitlements on Parcel 61 within the Property and Landowner shall receive credits for a total of 64 deed-restricted multi-family housing units ("Affordable Housing Credits"). City agrees that any such Affordable Housing Credits may be transferred to and used to satisfi andlor offset the inclusionary andlor affordable housing obligation for any residential project on Parcel 61,77 or 854-3 or 854-4.

2. Effect of Amendment. This Amendment No. 2 amends, but does not replace or supersede, the Development Agreement. Except as modified hereby, all other terms and provisions of the Development Agreement shaliremain in full force and effect. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1.5.3 of the Development Agreement, Landowner hereby reaffirms its agreement to abide by the provisions of the Development Agreement, as modified by this Amendment No. 2, and the conditions of approval imposed in connection with the Entitlements as applicable to the Property.

3. Form of Amendment: Execution in Counterparts. This AmendmentNo. 2 is executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and may be executed in counterparts. fRemainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signatures Follow on Next Page]

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Folsom has authorized the execution of this AmendmentNo. 2 in duplicate by its Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk under the authority of Ordinance No. adooted bv the Citv Council on
CITY LANDOWNER:

CITY OF FOLSOM
a municipal corporation
By:

Mayor
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT;
By
Elaine Anderson
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
By
Steven Wang
City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Christa Freemantle
City Clerk
Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By:

James Galovan
Authorized Signer

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

EXHIBIT 8.1
Legal Description of Affordable Housing Parcel
The land described herein is situated in the State of Califomia, County of Sacramento, City of Folsom, described as follows:

That portion of the designated Remainder lot, as shown on that certain map entitled "PN 2I-043 Parcel Map, Parcel 61 " filed for record in the office of the Recorder of the County of Sacramento, on October 12, 2021 , in Book 245 of Parcel Maps, at Page 2, Sacramento County Records.

APN: 072-3190-056

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

EXIIIBIT 8.2
Depiction of Affordable Housing Parcel
5 t 0t .64*N

4.24tN
oo RAI'ICH
SEr
,
I
2 I
,
NJ,
W.

I

46.65tN

RNAINOER
@
I
&
30*N
875,7J' ,
1 lJ.2ltAc.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Attachment 3
Planning Commission Staff Report
Dated February 15,2023

03/14/2023 Item No.14.
:l
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
Type: Public Hearing
Date: February 15,2023
Planning Commission Staff RePort
50 Natoma Street, Council Chambers
Folsom, CA 95630
Folsom Ranch Apartments
MSTR 22-00218
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Development Permit
Development Ag reement Amendment
Minor Adm inistrative Modification
The proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive within the Folsom Plan Area
Steve Banks, Principal Planner, 916-461-6207
[email protected]

CITY OF
]F(}]LS(}N4I
Project:

File #:

Requests:

Location
Staff Gontact:

Property Owner
Name: Eagle Office Properties, LLC Partners
Address: 100 Pine Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Applicant
Name: Lewis Management Corp.

Address: 1156 North Mountain
Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, Development Agreement Amendment, and Minor Administrative Modification for the Folsom Ranch Apartments project, based on the findings (Findings A-U) and subject to the conditions of approval (Conditions 1-46) attached to this report.

Project Summary: The proposed project includes development of a 238-unit market- rate apartment community on a 1S.8-acre site situated at the northwest corner of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive within the Folsom Plan Area.

The following are the specific entitlements requested with the proposed project.

A Gonditional Use Permit for development and operation of a market-rate apartment community on the subject 1S.8-acre property.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.
c ITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
Type: Public Hearing
Date: February 15,2023
A Ptanned Development Permit which contains detailed development and architectural standards for the proposed 238-unit residential apartment community.

A Development Agreement Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement to deed restrict 64 affordable housing units on a 47- acre remainder portion of Parcel 61 in the Folsom Plan Area.

A Minor Administrative Modification to transfer 116 MMD allocated units from Parcel 61 to the subject parcel (Parcel 85A), to transfer 221 MHD allocated units from the subject parcel (Parcel 85A) to Parcel 61, and to transfer 3.3-acres of Parkland from the subject parcel (Parcel 85A) to Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan Area.

These proposed actions are described in detail and analyzed later in this report.

Table of Contents:

Attachment 1 - Background and Setting
Attachment 2 - Project Description
. Conditional Use Permit
. Planned Development Permit
. Development Agreement Amendment
o Minor Administrative Modification
Attachment 3 - Analysis
. Conditional Use Permit
r Planned Development Permit
o Development Agreement Amendment
o Minor Administrative Modification
Attachment 4 - Conditions of Approval
Attachment 5 - Vicinity MaP
Attachment 6 - Preliminary Site Plan, dated February 3,2023 Attachment 7 - Preliminary Utility Plans, dated February 3,2023 Attachment I - Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plans, dated February 3,2023 Attachment 9 - Preliminary Landscape Plan and Details, dated February 1,2022 ]FO]LSCDN1T
a
a
a

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
Type: Public Hearing
Date: February 15,2023
F"@H.6@Rd
Attachment 10 - Preliminary Access and Circulation Plan, February 1,2023 Attachment 11 - Preliminary Fence and Wall Plan, dated February 1,2023 Attachment 12 - Preliminary Lighting Plan and Details, dated October, 2O22 Attachment 13 - Building Elevations and Floor Plans, dated February 2,2023 Attachment14 - Color Renderings, dated February 2,2023
Attachment 15 - Color and Materials Board, dated February 2,2023 Attachment 16 - Minor Administrative Modification Exhibits, dated July 29,2022 Attachment 17 - Folsom Ranch Apartments Booklet (Separate Bound Document) Attachment 18 - Amendment No. ) to f irst Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan Attachment 19 - Transportation lmpact Study, dated December 13,2022 Attachment20 - CEQA Exemption and Streamlining Analysis and Checklist for Folsom Ranch Apartments Project, dated Oclober,2022
.Attachmenl2l - Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Consistency Analysis for Folsom Ranch Apartments Project
Attachment22 - Folsom Ranch Apartments Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Attachment23 - Site Photographs
Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Commun ity Development Director

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
ATTACHMENT 1

BACKGROUND AND SETTING
Background:

The proposed project site is part of the approved Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP), a comprehensively planned community that proposes new development based "Smart Growth" and Transit Oriented Development principles. The FPASP, approved in 2011, is a development plan for over 3,500 acres of previously undeveloped land located south of U.S. Highway 50, north of White Rock Road, east of Prairie City Road, and west of the Sacramento County/El Dorado County line in the southeastern portion of the City.

The FPASP includes a mix of residential, commercial, employment and public uses, complemented by recreational amenities including a significant system of parks and open space, all within close proximity to one another and interconnected by a network of "complete streets", trails and bikeways. The Specific Plan is consistent with the SACOG Blueprint Principles and the requirements of SB 375 (Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act). The FPASP includes 11,461 residential units at various densities on approximately 1,630 acres; 310 acres designated for commercial and industrial use; +/-130 acres designated for public/quasi-public uses, elementary/middle school/high schools, and community/neighborhood parks; and +/-1 ,1 10 acres for open-space areas.

Since FPASP adoption in 2O11, the City Council has approved eight amendments to the Specific Plan with land use and density refinements. Overall, the changes to the Specific Plan have reduced the amount of commercial development planned for the area and increased the amount of residential development:

Approved 2011
Gommercial: 5,199,408 SF
Residential Units: 10,210 Units
As Amended to Date
2,788,844 SF (-2,410,564 SF)
11,461 Units (+1,251 Units)
Based on the approved changes, the projected population of the FPASP has increased from24,362 (based on approved development in 2010) to 27,965 (as approved to date). ln addition, a number of Minor Administrative Modifications have been approved. These minor modifications moved allocated residential dwelling units to new locations in the FPASP area, but did not affect the overall number of approved residential units. Because they do not increase or decrease residential units, these minor modifications do not affect the ultimate population of the FPASP area.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
On March 17,2O2O, the City approved a Minor Administrative Modification (MAM) to shift commercial and residential square footage among multiple parcels (Parcels 61, 77, 78, and 85A) located within the Folsom Plan Area including the subject parcel in order to meet the maximum development intent of the properties involved. The resulting Transfer of Development Rights resulted in the subject property (Parcel 85A) being allocated G22,OOO gross square feet for a mixture of different commercial land uses (GC-RC, GC- GC, and GC-lND/OP).

On May 19,2021, the Planning Commission approved a Planned Development Permit, and Conditional Use Permit for development of a 530,000-square-foot Dignity Medical Center (Folsom Ranch Medical Center) on a 27 .44-acre site (Parcel 85A-1) located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Bidwell Street and Alder Creek Parkway within the Folsom Plan Area. The Folsom Ranch Medical Center project is located across future McCarthy Way directly to the west of the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project site. On June 22, 2021, the City Council approved a Development Agreement Amendment associated with the previously approved Folsom Ranch Medical Center project.

The Folsom Ranch Apartments project site is currently comprised of two separate parcels, FPASP Parcel 85A-3 and FPASP Parcel 85A-4 as shown in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan. Both project parcels are currently designated as SP-GC (Specific plan-General Commercial within the Specific Plan. The parcels were also allocated a combination of multi-family medium density units (122 MMD units), multi-family high- density units (221 MHD units), and parkland (3.3-acres parkland) in additionalto general commercial square footage. As part of the subject application, the applicant is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for development of townhome-style apartment buildings on the two project parcels. An excerpt from the FPASP Land Use Map is shown on the following Page.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
FIGURE 1: FPASP LAND USE MAP EXCERPT
:
.j
US HTGHWAY 50
le
t-
Physical Sefting
The rectangular-shaped 15.8-acre project site, which is comprised of an 8.s-acre parcel (APN: 072-4110-001) and a 7.3-acre parcel (APN: 0724110-002), has been mass graded and peripheral infrastructure improvements are being installed as part of development of the Dignity Medical Center prolect. The project site is bounded by Placerville Road to the north with a future single-family residential subdivision beyond, Alder Creek Parkway to the south with a single-family residentialsubdivision beyond, future McCarthy Way to the west with the future Folsom Ranch Medical Center beyond, and future Westwood Drive to the east with a future single-family residential subdivision beyond. An aerial photograph of the project site is shown in Figure 2 on the following page:
ot!
o
Project Sites; 854-3,
854-4
Follom R6nch
tcdacal Conter
Thi' thopt
rt Foborn R.nch
----
Encl.Ya
6nck
P*col77
Rockcrue
m 430 2
Pharo lC ifecks

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218')
February 15,2023
FIGURE 2. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF PROJECT SITE
l

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
IIsSTflTTACHMENT 2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
The applicant, the Lewis Management Corporation, is requesting approval of a Planned Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement, and Minor Administrative Modification for the development and operation of a 238-unit market rate apartment community (Folsom Ranch Apartments) on a 1S.8-acre site located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive within Folsom Plan Area.

As noted above, the applicant is requesting approval of four entitlements to allow for development of the proposed apartment community. The first entitlement is a request for approval of a Planned Development Permit to establish project-speciflc development standards, review the project site design, evaluate the architectural design of the multi- family apartment buildings and clubhouse, and establish signage criteria. The second entitlement is a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for development and operation of paired, townhome-style apartment buildings on the project site. The third entitlement is a request for approval of a Development Agreement Amendment (Attachment 18) to the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement in order to deed restrict 64 affordable housing units on a 47-acre remainder portion of Parcel 61 in the Folsom Plan Area. The fourth entitlement is a request for approval of a Minor Administrative Modification (MAM) for the transfer of development rights to move 221 MHD units from the project site to Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan Area, to move 116 MMD units from Parcel 61 to the project site, and to move 3.3-acres of parkland (PARK) from the project site to Parcel 61.

The proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project, which includes development of 119 two-story townhome-style apartment buildings and a one-story clubhouse building, is comprised of 238 market-rate apartments within a gated community. The two-story apartment buildings include a total of 1O4 two-bedroom units (1,175 square feet) and 134 three-bedroom units (1,611 to 1,829 square feet). All apartment units are proposed to be accessible from exterior doorways and include a full kitchen, living space, washer/dryer, storage closets, bedrooms, bathrooms, and an outdoor balcony/patio. The one-story clubh-ouse building features a fitness studio, an office, a reception lounge, an equipment room, and restroom facilities. Outdoor amenities associated with the clubhouse building include a pool, a spa, sun deck, seating areas,'barbecue areas, tot lot, and a dog park.

In relation to site design, the townhome-style apartment buildings are distributed evenly throughout the project site, with the clubhouse building, tot lot, and dog park being situated in the northern portion of the p@ect site. Wth respect to architectural style, the proposed project features a contemporary Spanish Colonial design theme featuring stucco exteriors, tile roofs, wood trim, decorative iron detailing, and an earthtone color

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
scheme.

Primary vehicle access to the project site includes two new driveways, both located on the west side of Westwood Drive respectively. The two primary access driveways will accommodate all turning movements into and out of the project site. Emergency vehicle access is provided by a gated driveway on the east side of McCarthy Way and a gated driveway on the west side of Placerville Road. Proposed internal vehicle circulation consists of a series of 27-foot-wide drive aisles that provide access in and around the project site. Pedestrian circulation is provided by new sidewalks located along the street frontages of Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, McCarthy Way, Mercy Drive, and Placerville Road, with seven pedestrian gates are provide access from the project site to the adjacent sidewalks. lnternal pedestrian circulation is accommodated by a series of new pedestrian pathways that provide connectivity to the apartment buildings, the clubhouse building, and the perimeter sidewalks. Additional site improvements include:
597 parking spaces (includes combination of garage and uncovered parking spaces), bicycle parking spaces, electric vehicle charging stations, underground utilities, drainage swales, site lighting, site landscaping, retaining walls, fencing, and project identification signs. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 3 below.

FIGURE 3: PROPOSED SITE PLAN
-i:;
:
:
i.
!l:
l
i'

1. . ::
t:

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
ATTACHMENT 3

ANALYSIS
The following sections provide an analysis of the applicant's proposal. Staff's analysis includes:

A. General Plan and Specific Plan Consistency
B. Conditional Use Permit
o Land Use ComPatibilitY
C. Planned DeveloPment Permit
. State Housing Accountability Act
. DevelopmentStandards
. Building Architecture and Design
. Signage
D. Development Agreement Amendment
E. Traffic/Access/Circulation
F. Parking
G. Noise lmpacts
H. Walls/Fencing
l. Site Lighting
J. Trash/Recycling
K. Existing and Proposed Landscaping
L. Frontage lmprovements
M. Minor Administrative Modification (Transfer of Development Rights) N. Conformance with Relevant Folsom General Plan and Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Objectives and Policies
A. General Plan and Specific Plan Consistency
General Plan and Specific Plan Amendment and Consistencv The 15.8-acre project site has a General Plan land use designation of GC (General Commercial) and a Specific Plan land use designation of SP-GC-PD (Specific Plan- GeneralCommercial-Planned Development Permit). ln addition, the project site has been allocated with multi-family residential units (122 MMD units and 221 MHD units) and parkland (3.3-Acres PARK). The project is consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and the Specific Plan land use designation, as duplexes and similar uses are identified as a permitted land use within the SP-GC land use designation of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan approval of a Conditional Use Permit (FPASP, Table

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
A.7). ln addition, the proposed project meets the development requirements established by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (Table A.4, MLD Two-Family Dwellings) with respect to lot area, building height, building coverage, and setbacks. A slight modification to the development requirements relative to the number of covered parking spaces is proposed with this application and is discussed within the Planned Development Permit section of this staff report.

B. Conditional Use Permit
Land Use Compatibilitv
The proposed project is located on an undeveloped, 15.8-acre commercially designated property situated at the northwest corner of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive. As described and shown in the Background section of this staff report, the project site is bounded by Placerville Road to the north with a future single-family residential subdivision beyond, Alder Creek Parkway to the south with a single-family residential subdivision beyond, future McCarthy Way to the west with the future Folsom Ranch MedicalCenter beyond, and future Westwood Drive to the eastwith a future single- family residential subdivision beyond.

The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop and operate a 238-unit market rate "paired" apartment community on the subject 1S.8-acre project site located at the northwest corner of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive. The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use (paired, townhome-style apartment buildings similar to duplexes) at this location, which has a Specific Plan land use designation of SP-GC-PD. (FPASP, Table A.7.) The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (Specific Plan) states that the General Commercial land use designation is intended to provide for a wide range of highway- oriented retail, office, manufacturing, lodging, and service uses. However, the Specific Plan also indicates that office and multi-family residential uses are permitted (conditionally permitted in this specific case) and encouraged for three of the commercial sites located at the intersection of East Bidwell Street and Alder Creek Parkway, including the subject site (Parcel 85A-3 and 85A-4).
ln order to approve this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Commission must find that the "establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use or building applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or be detrimental or injurious to property and implovements in the neighborhood, or to the general welfare of the City.' (FMC S

17.60.040.)

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
As a housing development project, the proposed project is also subject to the State Housing Accountability Act and subsequent State legislation (SB 330) whose intent is to promote housing development in the State by limiting local authority to deny housing development projects, downzone propefi, reduce the density of residential projects, or adopt or apply new subjective design standards. As stated in the Housing Accountability Act, the Legislature's intent with this legislation was to "meaningfully and effectively curb[] the capability of local governments to deny, reduce the density for, or render infeasible housing development projects." (Government Code S 65589.5(aX2XK).) Under the Housing Accountability Act, when a proposed market rate housing development project complies with applicable, objective development standards but the local agency proposes to deny the project, the agency must base its decision on written findings supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the record that both of the following conditions exist:

1. The project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. For purposes of this finding, "specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they exited on the date the application was deemed complete.

2. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified above, other than the disapproval of the project.

Government Code S 65589.sCI)(1)
ln the event the Commission were to consider denying the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed project, the Commission would need to make the standard Conditional Use Permit denial finding and also the statutorily required findings mentioned above, to the effect that (1) the proposed project would have a "specific adverse impact" upon the public health or safeg, meaning a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete (August 20, 2021) by the City; and (2) there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact. For reference purposes, listed below are examples of the two statutorily required findings that would need to be made (in addition to the standard CUP denial finding) in order to the deny the Conditional Use Permit:

The housing development project as proposed would have a specific, adversea impact upon the public health or safety, because

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
o There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact mentioned above, other than disapproval of the project or approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density because ln reviewing the request for a Conditional Use Permit, staff took into consideration the compatibility of the proposed land use in relation to the existing land uses in the immediate project vicinity. Potential noise impacts, traffic impacts, parking impacts, and aesthetic impacts were also analyzed and are addressed within separate sections of this report.

As mentioned earlier within this report, the project site is located in close proximity to a major arterial roadway (Alder Creek Parkway) and within an area that will eventually include a mixture of different types of land uses including single-family residences, multi- family residences, medical and professional offices, two hospitals, a retail shopping center, a park, and an elementary school. ln the immediate project area, the only existing land use is a single-family residential subdivision (KB Homes Soleil at Folsom Ranch) located across Alder Creek Parkway to the south. Future land uses in the immediate prgect vicinity include the Folsom Ranch Medical center across future McCarthy Way to the west and a single-family residential subdivision across Westwood Drive to the east.

The proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project is a market rate rental community that will provide housing opportunities for approximately 595 residents. Given the residential nature of the proposed use, staff has determined that the proposed project will be complimentary to the existing single-family residential land uses located in the immediate project vicinity and the future single-family residential and multi-family residential uses in the project area. ln addition, staff has determined that the proposed project will also be complimentary to future surrounding non-residential uses in the vicinity that will provide a variety of daily and weekly services (medicaloffices, hospital, retail shopping center, park, and school) to the apartment residents.

Staff is generally supportive of the proposed use in the subject location. Some of the potential impacts considered in reaching that conclusion were noise, traffic, parking, and aesthetics. Those issues and the associated conditions of approval on the project are discussed in detail in other sections of the report. For purposes of this section of the report, staff notes that the conditions of approval imposed on the project are intended to address and mitigate any adverse impacts on the surrounding community potentially caused by the proposed project, and also to protect future residents of the proposed project from adverse impacts they could potentially experience due to existing and anticipated surrounding land uses. Staff therefore recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit, with the proposed conditions of approval, to allow development of "paired" townhouse-style apartments in this location.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
C. Planned DeveloPment Permit
The purpose of the Planned Development Permit process is to allow greater flexibility in the design of integrated developments than otherwise possible through strict application of land use regulitions. The Planned Development Permit process is also designed to encourage creative and efficient uses of land. The following are proposed as part of the applicant's Planned Development Permit:
o State Housing Accountability Act
. DevelopmentStandards
. Building Architecture and Design
. Signage
State Housinq Accountability Act
Se@rauthoredSenateBill330(.SB330"),the..HouSingCrisisActof 2019," to "suspend certain restrictions on the development of new housing during the period of the statewide emergency" through January 1, 2025 stemming from the lack of housing supply throughout the state. On October 9,2019, Governor Newsom signed SB 330 into law'eifective as of January 1,2020. Subsequently, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed Senate Bill 8, which extends SB 330 through January 1, 2030.

Although SB 330 enacted numerous changes to the procedures for processing, reviewi-ng, and approving housing development projects, one of its changes is of particulai relevance to the Planning Commission with respect to the proposed prolect. bg ggO added provisions to the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 65589.5, or the 'HAA") to ensure only objective standards are used to deny or reduce the density of a housing development project.

At the highest level, the HAA limits the City's discretion with respect to housing development projects to the evaluation of that project's consistency with objective development standards. As amended by SB 330, "objective" mgan: "involving no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and being uniformly verifiable by ieference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official".

As noted above, the HAA's key function is to limit the City's discretion with respect to housing development projects. Specifically, when a housing development project compli-s with applicable, objective development standards, the City may not deny the project or impose a condition that it be developed at a lower density without making bpecific findings that the project would otherwise have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety that cannot be mitigated. Despite this limitation, the HAA provides that, "nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a local agency from requiring the housing development project to comply with objective, quantifiable, written

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
development standards, conditions, and policies appropriate to, and consistent with, meeting the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need.

For a standard to be objective, it must be "ttniformly verifiable," which means that "there is little to no room for reasonable persons to differ on whether a project complies with [an external and uniforml benchmark." Examples of objective standards can include building setbacks, building height requirements, and building lot coverage when they are suitably specific. For example, requirements that building height not exceed 45 feet, that buildings shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet to a maximum of 20 feet from the property line, and that a building or buildings cover no more than 50% of lot, are all objective, because it is possible for an applicant, the public, City staff, or City officials to know whether an application complies by reference to measurable benchmarks. Likewise, design review criteria can be objective by making reference to specific features, such as a roof pitch with a slope of 1:5. References to design styles may be objective so long as the elements are clearly defined and include illustrations.

By contrast, standards that are "so malleable that reasonable minds could differ on whether they are met" are not objective, and may not be a basis to deny, or reduce the density of housing development projects pursuant to the HAA. lf a standard requires any level of "after-the-fact interpretive gloss," it is not sufficiently objective. For example, the City of San Mateo established guidelines that advised an applicant to avoid changes in OuitOing height greater than one story from adjacent structures. The guidelines further provided that if height varied by more than one story between buildings, a transition or step in height would be necessary. Such standards are not objective, because it is not knowable in advance when changes greater than one story in height would be allowable or how much "transition or step in height" would be sufficient to bring a project into conformity with the guideline. With that said, the HAA does not barthe City from imposing conditions of approval based on adopted standards that are not objective (like the Multifamily Design Guidelines, for example), as long as those conditions do not have the effect of reducing the project density.

Standards that require a project to obtain entitlements that involve subjective decision- making (like a Conditional Use Permit) are likewise not objective, and therefore they cannol be used to deny a housing development project, given the requirements of the HAA. For example, the State Department of Housing and Community Development advises that, "a standard that requires a general plan amendment, the adoption of a specific plan, planned development permit, conditional use permit or another discretionary permit or approval does not constitute an objective standard." Under HCD's guidance, the City "shall not require a development proponent to meet any standard for wnicn the locality typically exercises subjective discretion, on a case-by-case basis," because such a requirement would expose housing development projects to non- objective standards, upending the HAA's protections.

As it relates to the State Housing Accountability Act, the proposed project includes a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Planned Development. As

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
discussed previously within the Conditional Use Permit section of this staff report, if the Commission were to consider denying the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed project, the Commission would need to make findings to the effect that the proposed project would have a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete by the City. ln addition, the Commission would need to find that any such impacts could not be mitigated without denying the project. ln this particular case, the City in its review of the Conditional Use permit, did not identify any specific adverse impact associated with development of the apartment community.

With respect to requested Planned Development Permit, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan includes objective standards (FPASP Table A 4) that regulate residential development with respect to minimum lot area, minimum lot width, building setbacks, building height, and parking. As stated previously within this report, the proposed pro.lect meets Ltt of these objective standards with the exception of the parking requirement where the-applicant is requesting approval to deviate from the parking standard for the required covered parking spaces in order to increase the number of trees planted within the project site.

A review of the architecture and design of the proposed apartment building is included as part of the Planned Development Permit. As discussed within the Planned Development section of this staff report, the proposed prolect is subject to the Multi-Family Design Guidelines established within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan and the Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Development. While City staff has determined that the architecture and design of the proposed project meets the intent of these two sets of design guidelines, these guidelines do not provide specific objective standards for the purpose! of complying with the Housing Accountability Act. As a result, the Commission would not be able to deny the Planned Development Permit on the basis on the project's architecture and design. However, the Planning Commission is able to recommend modifications to the design, color, and materials of the apartment buildings and include the same as conditions of approvalon the project, so long as these changes do not reduce the overall density of the proposed prolect.

Development Standards
fne appticant's intent with the subject application is to create a set of development standards that will comply with the development standards established within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan for multi-family designated residential (SP-MMD-PD) properties with the exception of creating a new standard for the required number of covered parking spaces. The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan indicates that multi-family duplex units developed within GC designated properties such as the subject site shall be subject to the MMD development standards (FPASP Table A.4). The Specific Plan requires that two covered parking spaces be provided for each apartment unit. The applicant is proposing this standard be modified for the proposed project with one covered and one uncovered parking space being required forthe two-bedroom units (104 units), with the

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
three-bedroom units still being required to include two covered parking spaces. The deviation in the covered parking requirement is being requested to allow for the planting of additional trees throughout the project site. The table on the following page outlines the existing and proposed development standards for the Folsom Ranch Apartments project:

TABLE 1: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE
As shown on the development standards table, the proposed project meets or exceeds all development standards established for the SP-MMD-PD (Multi-Family Medium Density) zoning district within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, with the exception of |1n" nunin.r of-required covered parking spaces as previously discussedlsD2]. Parking is addressed separately within the Parking Section of this staff report. ln addition, the proposed project is requesting approval to deviate from the signage requirements established within the Folsom Municipal Code. by having four project identification signs (the FPASP does not have specific standards with regard to signage).

A detailed discussion of the project identification request is contained within the Signage section of this report.

Buildinq Architecture and Desion
ns OetaiteO in ne Project Description section of this report, the proposed project includes development of 119 two-story townhome-style apartment buildings and a one-story clubhouse building. ln terms of architectural style, the proposed project features a contemporary Spanish Colonial design theme featuring stucco exteriors, tile roofs, wood trim, decorative iron detailing, and an earthtone color scheme. Proposed elevations, renderings, and street scenes of the apartment buildings and clubhouse are shown on the following pages.

Development Standards Table
Side Yard
Setbacks
ing
Height
Front Yard
Setback
Rear Yard
Setback
Lot
Area
Lot
width
10 feet
minimum
50 feet
maximum
15 feet
minimum
10 feet
minimum
6,000 sf
min.
60 feet
min.
27 feel10 feet
minimum
10 feet
minimum
15 feet
minimum
688,248 sf 60
Feet
min.

Proiect

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
FIGURE 4: BUILDING ELEVATIONS APARTMENT 1A
Rr(;nI ntvAI()N
ItfI iltvAlt()N
FIGURE 5: BUILDING ELEVATIONS APARTMENT 34
RrctiT il.tvATloN
RtAR II TVATION
I R()NI tttVAltoN
RtAR TLIYAIIC]N
H] HI H IEI
ar:

Hil
HH
-:-
m
EH H
LSU
HH HH
HHE
p'1']HH
Iil I ltfv^lk)N f_-trr._--- IRONT TI TVATIoN

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
H
+
HgH
FIGURE 6: BUILDING ELEVATIONS APARTMENT 5A
FIGURE 7: BUILDING ELEVATIONS CLUBHOUSE
RtAR tttv^l!(lN
tRoNr trtYAlloN
R{arl iltv,1r()N
ffi ts iff
rtfl tLlvAll()N
RIC}'iT TLTVATION
RfAR trtvAl()N
o
t
{
HHH
!
FmFmmm
I ral n[vAn()N
t1

IRONT TITVATION

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
FIGURE 8: BUILDING RENDERINGS
I
!
FIGURE 9: STREET SCENES
5A
a
Hs a
,A
srRlil {r\tA
lxc 1C
51rut1 sctNt I
]c
txA
1ffi
11,l'F!
.*alo
xrEffF
il txc
$Rr.flsGN[C

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-002'18)
February 15,2023
The Housing Accountability Act effectively prevents the City from denying a housing development project for failing to comply with subjective design standards. (Government Code S 65589.50X1); Government Code S 65589.5(f)(1); Government Code S 65589.5(i); see also Government Code S 65589.5(hXB) ) However, subjective design standards or criteria can support conditions of approval on a market rate residential project, as long as they do not result in a reduced density or a reduction of the percentage of a lot that may be occupied by a building.

The proposed prolect is subject to the City's De6ign Guidelines for Multi-Family Development. The Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Development recommend that multi-family projects be designed in a manner that compliments the surrounding communi$. The following are some of the specific design recommendations suggested by the Design Guidelines:
o Variety and distinctness in design are desirable
. Expanses of uninterrupted wall area, unbroken roof forms, and box-like structures shall be prohibited. Balconies, porches, bay windows, chimneys, and other design elements with projections and varied setbacks shall be used to break up.the physical characteristics of structu res.
. Separations and changes in the height of roof planes shall be used to visually separate the units. Articulation such as roof dormers, hips, gables, balconies, wall projections, and porches shall be used to break up the visual massing of building facades.
o The use of a variety and combination of building materials is encouraged. Building materials selected for multi-family projects shall be very durable and require low maintenance including, but not limited to, stucco, stone, and brick. Building materials shall integrate quality design elements consistent with the design of the development and the surrounding neighborhood.
. Predominant roof materials shall be of high quality, durable material such as, but not limited to, clay or concrete roof tiles and asphalt shingles. o Exterior building colors shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood setting and shall not be out of character or in visual competition with the existing surrounding design elements.
. All accessory structures, including carports, garages, and solid waste enclosures, shall be designed with materials and in a manner consistent with the architectural design characteristics of the development.

As illustrated on the building elevations, color renderings, and street scenes (Attachments 13-15), the proposed apartment buildings and clubhouse incorporate many of the key design features recommended by the Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Development including use of varied building forms to create visual relief, use of building projections

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
to break the massing of the building, and the inclusion of unique design details to reinforce the Spanish Colonial design theme.

As shown on the color and materials board (Attachment 15), the proposed project utilizes a variety of natural building materials to enhance the appearance of the apartment buildingi and clubhouse. ln terms of building materials, traditional stucco is juxtaposed with wood trim elements, metaldesign details, and concrete roof tiles. Cladding, signage, fencing, and other building materials have been incorporated to emulate the local context of the surrounding residential neighborhoods, but with a focus on the contemporary Spanish Colonial design theme. With respect to building colors, the proposed project utilizes a series of light earthy gray and tan colors which are supplemented by a series of darker and lighter accent colors.

Based on the aforementioned analysis, staff has determined that the proposed project features a high-quality design that is consistent with the design recommendations of the Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Development. As a result, staff recommends approval of the applicant's design with the following conditions, to which the applicant does not object:

1. This approval is for 119 two-story townhome-style apartment buildings and a one- story clubhouse building associated with the Folsom Ranch Apartments project.

The applicant shall submit building plans that comply with this approval and the attached building elevations and color renderings dated October 14,2022.

2. The design, materials, and colors of the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments apartment buildings and clubhouse shall be consistent with the submitted building elevations, color renderings, materials samples, and color scheme to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

3. Brick pavers or another type of colored masonry material (ADA compliant) shall be used to designate pedestrian crosswalks on the project site, in addition to where pedestrian paths cross drive aisles, and shall be incorporated as a design feature at the driveway entrances at Westwood Drive to the satisfaction of the Commun ity Development Department.

4. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, including satellite dish antennas, shall not extend above the height of the parapet walls. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be shielded by landscaping or trellis type features.

5. Utility equipment such as transformers, electric and gas meters, electrical panels, and junction boxes shall be screened by walls and or landscaping.

These recommendations are included in the conditions of approval (Condition No. 41) presented for consideration by the Planning Commission.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Sionaqe
The proposed project includes two freestanding monument signs and two decorative wall signs inlaid in the perimeter sound wall. The two monument signs are located within a landscaped area at the two project entrances on Westwood Drive. The two decorative wall signs are located on the perimeter wall at the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and McCarthy Way and the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive respectively. The two proposed monument signs, which are approximately 32 square feet in size, are designed to complement the design of the apartment buildings and feature the use of stucco, brick, and tube steel. The two monument signs, which are double sided, will feature copy that reads "Folsom Ranch Apartments" as well as the project address. The two monument signs will be indirectly illuminated by two inset-up spotlights.

The two decorative walls signs, which are 20 square feet in size and will be indirectly illuminated by two inset-up spotlights, feature copy that reads "Folsom Ranch Apartments". Staff has determined that the design of the proposed monument and wall signs are complementary to the design of the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments.

The Folsom Municipal Code (FMC, Section. 17.50.040 D) states that monument identiflcation signs are an acceptable form of identification for multi-family residential projects. The Folsom Municipal Code states that multi-family residential projects are permitted one freestanding sign that is a maximum of six-feet-tall with a maximum sign area of 32 square feet. The Folsom Municipal Code also states that multi-family residential projects are permitted one wall-mounted sign with a maximum sign area of 40 square feet.

Through the Planned Development Permit process, the applicant is seeking approval for two monument signs and two walls signs to provide identification forthe proposed project.

Staff has determined that two monument signs and two wall signs are appropriate given that the project has two unique driveway entrances with a significant degree of physical separation, and also based on the large physical scale of the apartment community. Staff recommends that the owner/applicant obtain a sign permit prior to installation of the two monument signs and two wall signs. Condition No. 43 is included to reflect this requirement.

D. DevelopmentAgreement Amendment
The City and Landowner's predecessor (Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC) previously entered into the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement By and Between the City of Folsom and Landowner Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan on July 15, 2014. Section 1.5 of the Restated Development Agreement allows the Restated Development Agreement to be amended from time to time by mutual written consent of the parties. On lf.lovember 12,2015[SD3], Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC, and the City entered into Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Tier 1

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Development Agreement Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan. The Landowner is proposing Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan forthe purpose of deed restricting 64 affordable housing units on a portion of the Remainder within Parcel 61 located within in the Folsom Plan Area. This property is also owned by Eagle Office Properties.

As described above, the Landowner is proposing to deed restrict 64 multi-family housing units on a portion of the Remainder wiihin Parcel 61, located within in lhe Folsom Plan Area, for the purpose of assisting the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) assigned by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. The 64 multi-family housing units, which would be made available to low- , very-low, and/or extremely-low income households, will be deed restricted for a period of 55 years from the date of recording. The deed restriction must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the Folsom Ranch Apartments Project. ln the event that Landowner (or a successor in interest) proposes residential development on Parcel 61 in the future, any applicable requirement for inclusionary and/or affordable housing will be offset by 64 units.

There is no inclusionary or affordable housing requirement applicable to the proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project. ln the unlikely event that the City passes an inclusionary housing ordinance applicable to rental units, the proposed project would be subject to it, unless a complete application for a building permit is submitted before the new ordinance takes effect.

Staff recommends that the form of deed restriction be submitted with owner/applicant's application for a building permit and will be subject to the City Attorney's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Condition No. 7 is included to reflect this requirement.

City staff is supportive of the Development Agreement Amendment as described above.

The Planning Commission will be making a recommendation regarding the Development Agreement Amendment to the City Council as Development Agreements require City Council review and approval.

E. Traffic/Access/Girculation
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan established a series of plans and policies for the circulation system within the entire Plan Area. The FPASP circulation system was designed with a sustainable community focus on the movement of people and provides a number of mobility alternatives such as walking, cycling, carpooling, and viable forms of public transportation in addition to vehicular circulation. The circulation plan evaluated regional travel, both in terms of connectivity and capacity as well as local internal connections and access. The circulation plan also addressed the concerns of regional traffic, including parallel capacity to U.S. Highway 50, and connectivity with surrounding

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
jurisdictions while considering community-wide connectivity, alternative modes of travel, and the provision of complete streets.

The 2011 Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Environmental lmpact ReporUEnvironmental lmpact Statement included not only a detailed analysis of traffic-related impacts within the Plan Area, but also an evaluation of traffic-related impacts on the surrounding communities. ln total, there are fifty-five (55) traffic-related mitigation measures associated with development of the FPASP which are included as conditions of approval for the Folsom Ranch Apartments project. Many of these mitigation measures are expected to reduce traffic impacts to East Bidwell Street. lncluded among the mitigation measures are requirements to; fund and construct roadway improvements within the Plan Area, pay a fair-share contribution for construction of improvements north of U.S.

Highway 50, participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program, and Participate in the U.S. Highway 50 Corridor Transportation ManagementAssociation.

The Folsom Ranch Apartments project is subject to all traffic-related mitigation measures required by the 2011 FPASP EIR/EIS (Condition No. 46).

On May 5,2015, Fehr & Peers completed a Traffic lmpact Analysis for the Westland- Eagle Specific Plan Amendment project (an Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS was certified in association with the Westland-Eagle Specific Plan Amendment) and determined that the traffic impacts associated with that project had been adequately addressed in the 2011 Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS with inclusion of some minor adjustments.

On December 1, 2017, T.KEAR Transportation Planning & Management completed a Transportation lmpact Study (Study) for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project to ensure that no additional impacts would occur that were not previously identified and addressed by the 2011 FPASP ElRyElS and the 2015 Westland-Eagle Specific Plan Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS. The Study determined that, with planned street and intersection improvements, the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project would not create any new significant impacts when compared to the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Westland-Eagle Specific Plan Amendment Addendum.

On April 23,2021, DKS Associates completed a Transportation Analysis (Analysis) and CEQA lmpact Study to evaluate traffic, access, and circulation impacts associated with the 530,000-square-foot Folsom Ranch Medical Center p@ect. Six different scenarios were evaluated in reviewing traffic operations at the 19 study intersections including Existing Conditions (2021) and the five different development phases of the proposed project. To ensure safe and efficient traffic operations, the Analysis required certain roadway improvements be constructed with each phase of the project including but not limited to construction of McCarthy Way between Alder Creek Parkway and Placerville Road, construction of an additional 250-foot right-turn lane for southbound McCarthy Way approaching Alder Creek Parkway, construction of a full extension of the right-turn pocket on westbound Alder Creek Parkway from McCarthy Way to East Bidwell Street, and construction of a southbound emergency vehicle-only left-turn movement into the East

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Bidwell Street access point. All of the roadway improvements referenced above are currently under construction.

The Analysis prepared for the Folsom Ranch Medical Center project also considered three different access scenarios. The first access scenario, which is the access alternative suggested by Dignity Health, was to signalize the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and McCarthy Way at some point in the future. The second access scenario considered was to install a round-a-bout at the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and McCarthy Way at some point in the future. The third scenario, which is the City's preferred alternative, is to eliminate the existing eastbound left-turn pocket on Alder Creek Parkway at McCarthy Way at some point in the future when traffic conditions become unsafe or excessive delays occur, thereby directing vehicles headed to the Folsom Ranch Medical Center to use the future signalized intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive.

Existinq Roadway Network
The project site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive. Significant roadways in the project vicinity include U.S.

Highway 50, East Bidwell Street, Alder Creek Parkway, and Westwood Drive. U.S.

Highway 50 is a six-lane east-west highway with a 65-mph posted speed limit that passes through Folsom and connects the Sacramento region to Lake Tahoe and points beyond.

East Bidwell Street is a north-south roadway that runs from Riley street southward to White Rock Road. Alder Creek Parkway currently exists from East Bidwell Street to Placerville Road and beyond into the Russell Ranch Subdivision to the east. Westwood Drive runs from Mangini Parkway northward to Alder Creek Parkway, with an extension further north to Placerville currently under construction.

On December 13, 2022, Kimley Horn & Associates completed a Transportation lmpact Study (included as Attachment 19 to this staff report) that evaluated traffic, access, and circulation impacts associated with the proposed project. The Study relies, in part, on data and analysis contained in the transportation impact studies prepared for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project and the Folsom Ranch Medical Center project. As directed by City staff, the Study prepared for the proposed project reflects the City's preferred alternative scenario taken from the Folsom Ranch Medical Center Transportation lmpact Study. As mentioned previously, the City's preferred scenario includes the closure of the existing eastbound left turn lane on Alder Creek Parkway and McCarthy in the future and rerouting vehicles going to the Medical Center east to the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive, where dual left turn lanes will take vehicles north to Mercy Drive which connects direct to McCarthy Way to the west where the Medical Center will be located. The Study analyzed traffic operations at the following 7 study intersections in the vicinity of the project site:
r Alder Creek Parkway/McCarthy Way
o Alder Creek ParkwayA/Uestwood Drive
o Westwood Drive/Prolect Site Access Driveway (South)

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
o Westwood Drive/Mercy Drive
. Westwood Drive/Project Site Access Driveway (North)
. Westwood Drive/Placerville Road
. McCarthy Way/Mercy Drive
Two different scenarios were evaluated in reviewing traffic operations at the 7 aforementioned study intersections including Near Term (2023) Plus Project and Build- Out (20a0) Plus Project. The proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project is expected to generate a total of 1 13 vehicletrips during the weekday AM peak hour (35 inbound and 78 outbound) and 133 during the weekday PM peak hour trips (76 inbound and 57 outbound). Overall, the proposed project is projected to generate approximately 1,686 daily vehicle trips. Based on the expected number of project-related vehicle trips, the Study concluded that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on vehicle level of service (LOS) at any of the study intersections under Near Term (2023) Plus Project and Build-Out (2040) Plus Project conditions. ln addition, the Study determined that the proposed project would not result in any new traffic-related impacts that were not previously identified and addressed by traffic studies and environmental documents associated with the 2011 Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the 2015 Westland/Eagle Specific Plan Amendment, the 2017 Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision, and the2021 Folsom Ranch Medical Center project.

The Transportation lmpact Study evaluated the need for traffic signalization of the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive based on peak-hour warrant methodologies noted in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Study determined that the addition of the project-related vehicle trips does not trigger the needforthe signalization of the intersection of AlderCreek Parkway and Westwood Drive.

It is important to note that this particular intersection is anticipated to be signalized in the future under Building-Out (2040) conditions.

The Transportation lmpact Study evaluated the existing left turn movement on eastbound Alder Creek Parkway at Westwood Drive. The Study determined that the existing eastbound left-turn lane has sufficient vehicle storage capacity to accommodate the proposed project-related vehicle trips under Near-Term (2023) conditions. However, the Study noted that there will be the need for dual left-turns lanes on eastbound Alder Creek Parkway at Westwood Drive under Build-Out (2040) conditions when vehicle trips are rerouted from the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and McCarthy Way eastward to the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive. While the proposed project does not trigger any modifications to this intersection, the applicant has agreed to proactively construct specific improvements in anticipation of ultimate build-out conditions (2040) including relocating and restriping the existing left-turn lane, creating a future BRT lane, and modifying the existing median. Figure 10 on the following page shows the proposed design and configuration for the eastbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
tT- \(
]-uqr
FV)
I5
s
T7t5 tctg ,1
19 ,t
0it
I
0)
1?
20Il8
Future BRT Lane
J
FIGURE 1O: ALDER CREEK PARKWAYA/VESTWOOD DRIVE CONFIGURATION Lot 5F

ALDER CREEK PARKWAY
N89'14
84 The Transportation lmpact Study evaluated the need for a right-turn deceleration lane on westbound Alder Creek Parkway at McCarthy Way. The Study determined that under Build-Out (2040) conditions, approximately 1,100 vehicles would be traveling westbound on Alder Creek Parkway at McCarthy Way during the AM Peak Hour, with 22O of those vehicles making a right-turn movement from Alder Creek Parkway to McCarthy Way.

Based on the volume split of these vehicle trips, and the fact that the overall volume of vehicle trips is well below the industry-accepted saturation flowrate, the Study determined that the No. 3 westbound through-lane on Alder Creek Parkway would act as a de facto right-turn lane and would not result in a delay causing the need for construction of dedicated right-turn lane at McCarthy Way. While the proposed project does not trigger the need for tne No. 3 westbound lane on Alder Creek Parkway between Westwood Drive and McCarthy Way or the installation of a right-turn deceleration lane on westbound Alder Creek Parkway at McCarthy Way (ultimate build-out volumes and conditions require this roadway improvement to be constructed), the applicant has agreed to proactively construtt these improvements so that this section of roadway is built to its ultimate configuration. The owner/applicant is required to dedicate an additionalfour-feet of public 22 \\
-+€
{1
il
t,
\

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
right-of-way on westbound Alder Creek Parkway to accommodate this roadway improvement. Condition No. 35 is included to reflect this requirement. Figure 11 below shows the proposed design and configuration for the westbound Alder Creek Parkway between Westwood Drive and McCarthy Way.

FIGURE 11: ALDER CREEK PARKWAY/MCCARTHY WAY CONFIGURATION 5Aol
i
0 6 !f
rq
1?11 3
€uA
STREET
d
l$
=Ot)
irls
t-;e;Jrb
rt)
rt)
c)
z
Proiect Access and On-Site Circulation
As shown on the submitted Access and Circulation Plan (Attachment 10), access to the project site is provided by two new full-access driveways located on the east side of Westwood Drive. The first project driveway, which is located on the west side of Westwood Drive between Alder Creek Parkway and Mercy Drive, will accommodate all turning movements into and out of the project site. The second project driveway, which is located on the west side of Westwood Drive between Mercy Drive and Placerville Road, will also accommodate all turning movements into and out of the project site. Vehicle gates to control access into and out of the project site are proposed at both driveway

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
locations on Westwood Drive. Emergency vehicle access is provided by a gated driveway situated on the east side of McCarthy Way and another gated driveway on positioned on the east side of Placerville Road.

Proposed internal vehicle circulation consists of a series of 27-foot-wide drive aisles that provide access in and around the project site. Pedestrian circulation is provided by new sidewalks located along the street frontages of Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, McCarthy Way, Mercy Drive, and Placerville Road, with seven pedestrian gates included to provide access from the project site to the adjacent sidewalks. lnternal pedestrian circulation is accommodated by a series of new pedestrian pathways that provide connectivity between apartment buildings, the clubhouse building, the outdoor amenities, and the perimeter sidewalks. The proposed Access and Circulation plan is shown in Figure 12 below.

FIGURE 12.. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION EXHIBIT
ilH: LffiD
e-- .
,rlit'-\i, 1
!:
:i
+
ffi
The Transportation lmpact Study prepared for the proposed project evaluated the operation and configuration of the project access system in terms of driveway locations and spacing, driveway throat depth, internal vehicle circulation, and emergency vehicle access circulation. The Study determined that the two proposed driveways, located on Westwood Drive respectively, provide adequate spacing from the nearest street intersections and meet the City's Design Standards for driveways located on collector streets. The Study also determined that the two proposed prolect driveways provide sufficient throat depth for inbound and outbound vehicles so as to avoid excessive vehicle

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
queuing into the project site and onto adjacent public streets.

The Study considered on-site circulation and determined that the project features a well- designed parking lot layout which minimizes offset drive aisles and provides adequate drive aisle widthi ol27 ieet or greater. The Study determined that the proposed internal circulation system provides adequate space for emergency service vehicles to make all necessary turning movements and move freely throughout the project site. ln addition, the Studydetermined that there are abundant pedestrian facilities provided by the project including sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and pedestrian connections which facilitate pedestrian movements in and around the project site.

To ensure implementation of the traffic control measures identified on the submitted site plan and recommended by the Transportation lmpact Study, staff recommends the iollowing recommendations be included as conditions of approval for the project (Condition No. 35).

Alder Creek Parkwav (Eastbound)
. The owner/applicant shall reconstruct the existing center median to provide an additional 12feetof paving to accommodate a future BRT lane and a 14-foot-wide median at the eastbound approach to Westwood Drive from Alder Creek Parkway.

The owner/applicant shall also relocate the existing 12-foot-wide left-turn lane (200-feet-long with a 9O-foot-long taper) on the eastbound approach to Westwood brive from Alder Creek Parkway north to its ultimate location. With these proposed modifications, the eastbound approach to Westwood Drive from Alder Creek parkway shall include one left-turn lane, one future BRT lane, and one thru/right- turn lane. The owner/applicant is eligible for SPIF credits for these improvements.

Alder Creek Parkwav (Westbound)
o The owner/applicant shall construct two additional 1 1-foot-wide travel lanes (Lane No. 2 and No. 3) between Westwood Drive and McCarthy Way. The owner/applicant shall construct a 1SO-foot-long right-turn deceleration lane on the westbound approach to McCarthy Way from Alder Creek Parkway. With these proposed modifications, the westbound approach to McCarthy Way from Alder breek Parkway shall include two thru lanes and one right-turn lane. The owner/applicant is eligible for SPIF credits for these improvements. The owner/applicant is required to dedicate an additional four-feet of public right-of-way on westbound Alder Creek Parkway at McCarthy Way to accommodate the 150- foot-long right-turn deceleration lane.

Southern Proiect Drivewav (Westwood Drive)
; The owner/applicant shall construct a 1S0-foot-long left-turn lane with 60-foot-long taper on the northbound approach to the southern project driveway from Westwood Drive.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Northern Proiect Drivewav (Westwood Drive)
. The owner/applicant shall construct a 9O-foot-long leftturn lane with 60-foot-long taper on the northbound approach to the northern project driveway from Westwood Drive.

Additional Requ irements
. n ttop" sign and appropriate pavement markings shall be installed at the internal eastbound approach to the southern project driveway located on Westwood Drive. . A "stop" sign and appropriate pavement markings shall be installed at the internal eastbound approach to the northern driveway located on Westwood Drive. o The vehicle entry gates at the two project driveway locations shall open inward, away from Westwood Drive. ln addition, the design of the vehicle entry gates and ihe vehicle entry gate area shall conform to all requirements established by the City of Folsom for gated multi-family residential developments. lf vehicles are observed backing up into Westwood Drive at either of the two gated project entries, Cig staff will evaluate and require appropriate measures to itteviate the traffic congestion including but not limited to requiring the two project entry gates to remain open during the AM (7:00 a.m. to 9.00 a.m.) and PM (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) peak hours on weekdays.

Residents of the Folsom Ranch Apartments project shall be issued remote transmitters to allow them to open the entry gates without needing to stop to enter a code in the keypad at either entrance location. a
o
F. Parking
As noted in the Prolect Description, the proposed project includes a total of 238 apartment units including 104 two-bedroom units and 134 three-bedroom units. The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (Table A.14) requires that apartment developments located within a Multi-Family Medium Density (MMD) designated area, which is the standard utilized for the project even though it is situated in General Commercial designated area, provide two parking spaces for each two or three-bedroom unit, and

0.5 guest parking spaces for each apartment unit. As shown and described on the submitted site plan, the proposed project includes a total of 595 parking spaces including 476 covered garage parking spaces and 121 uncovered parking spaces.

As described previously within the Planned Development Permit portion of this staff report, the applicant is proposing that the standard for covered parking (two covered parking spaces required for each unit) be modified with one covered and one uncovered parking space being required for the two-bedroom units (104 units), and two covered parking spaces being required for the three-bedroom units. Staff supports the change to

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
the covered parking requirement as it will allow additional tree plantings on the project site. Staff has determined that the proposed project meets the parking requirements prescribed by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan by providing 595 parking spaces whereas a minimum of 595 parking spaces are required.

The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (Table A.14) requires that apartment developments located within a Multi-Family Medium Density (MMD) designated area provide one bicycle parking space for each apartment unit that does not have a garage. ln this case, each of ine apirtments has one or two covered garage parking spaces in which to store bicycles.

Staff has determined that the proposed project meets the bicycle parking requirements dictated by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan by providing opportunities for bicycle parking wiinin the garage spaces for each unit. However, staff does recommend that 20 bicycte parking spaces be provided at the communi$ clubhouse building (inside or ouiside) to serve residents of the community. Condition No. 38 is included to reflect this requirement.

G. Noise lmpacts
Based on the proximity of the prolect site to U.S. Highway 50, Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, and Placerville Road, acoustical measurements and modeling were prepared by Veneklasen Associates on August 16, 2022 to analyze potential noise impacts atthe proposed Folsom Ranch Apartments project site. The purpose of the Noise Analysis was to quantiff existing noise levels associated with traffic on the aforementioned roadways and to compare those noise levels against the applicable City of FolSom noise standards for acceptable noise exposure at the project site. ln addition, noise generated by the proposed pQect including construction activities, on-site parkingTcirculation, and mechanical equipment noise, was also evaluated in the Noise Analysis.

Two aspects of noise impacts were evaluated relative to the proposed apartment community, noise directed at the proposed project, and noise caused by the proposed project. As noted previously, the predominant existing noise sources in the project vicinity thai cause an impact to the project site are from vehicles traveling on U.S. Highway 50, Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, and Placerville Road, as well as background noises from adjacent nearby residential land uses. Potential noise impacts that might result from development of the Folsom Ranch Apartments project are construction- related activities and operationalactivities. Construction-related noise would have a short- term effect, while operational noise would continue throughout the lifetime of the project.

The Noise Element of the City of Folsom General Plan regulates noise emissions from public roadway traffic on new development of residential or other noise sensitive land uses. The Noise Element states that noise from traffic on public roadways shall not exceed 65 CNEL for outdoor use areas and 45 CNEL for interior use areas. The Noise Analysis determined that exterior noise levels at the outdoor use areas on the project site were less than 65 CNEL, which complies with the City's 65 CNEL outdoor use area noise

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
standard. The Noise Analysis also determined that the interior noise levels on the project site would be less than 45 CNEL, which complies with the City's 45 CNEL interior noise level standard. However, to further ensure the interior noise level standard would be satisfied, the Noise Analysis recommended that air conditioning be provided to allow residents to close windows and doors for appropriate acoustical isolation. ln addition, the Noise Analysis recommended that windows and glass doors within specific apartment buildings along Alder Creek Parkway, McCarthy Way, and Placerville Road (Figure 2 of Noise Analysis) have a minimum rating of STC 28 to maintain a consistent level of acoustical quality. Condition No. 40 is included to reflect these requirements.

Construction of the Folsom Ranch Apartments project would temporarily increase noise levels in the project vicinity during the construction period, which would take approximately 16 to 23 months. Construction activities, including site clearing, excavation, grading, building construction, and paving, would be considered an intermittent noise impact throughout the construction period of the project. The City's Noise Ordinance excludes construction activities from meeting the General Plan Noise Element standards, provided that all phases of construction are limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. To ensure compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element, staff recommends that hours of construction operation be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no construction permitted on Sundays or holidays. ln addition, staff recommends that construction equipment be muffled and shrouded to minimize noise levels. Condition No. 39 is included to reflect these requirements.

Operational noises generated by the proposed project include sounds associated with new vehicle trips, vehicle parking, and mechanical equipment associated with the apartment community. Persons and activities potentially sensitive to noise in the prolect vicinity include residents in the Enclave Subdivision (approximately 100 feet) across Alder Creek Parkway to the south and future residents within the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision (approximately 100 feet) across Westwood Drive to the east. Based on residential nature of the proposed project and the fact that the project site will be surrounded by residential and medical office development in the future, staff has determined that potential noise impacts relative to these operational noise sources will not be significant.

H. Walls/Fencing
As shown on the preliminary walland fence exhibit (Attachment 11), the proposed project includes a combination of retaining walls, perimeter walls, stucco walls, open-view steel fencing, and privacy vinylfencing. Split-face CMU retaining walls that range from 1-3 feet in height are proposed at various interior locations throughout the project site and also around portions of the perimeter. A six-foot-tall decorative split-face wall with pilasters is proposed around the entire perimeter of the project site. 'Six-foot-tall decorate stucco walls are proposed in specific areas around the clubhouse building. Open-view steel

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
fencing is proposed around portion of the clubhouse building and also to secure the dog parf and an outdoor amenity area. Lastly, six-foot-tall vinyl fencing is proposed as privacy iencing to separate the individual backyard areas. Staff recommends that the final locatio-n, design, height, materials, and colors of the retaining walls, perimeter walls, stucco walls, bpen-view fencing, and privacy fencing be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. Condition No. 16 is included to reflect this requirement.
l. Site Lighting
As shown on the preliminary lighting plan (Attachment 11), the applicant is proposing to use a combination of pole-mounted parking lot lighting, building-attached lighting, and bollard lights along the walkways on the project site. All lighting would be designed to minimize-lighUglare impacts to the adjacent properties by ensuring that allexterior lighting is shieldedlnd Oirected downward. Staff recommends that the final exterior building and site lighting plans be submitted for review and approval by Community Development Oepailmenl ior location, height, aesthetics, level of illumination, glare, and trespass prior to the issuance of any building permits. ln addition, staff recommends all lighting is designed to be shielded and directed downward onto the project site and away from adjaient properties and public rights-of-way. Condition No. 20 is included to reflect these requirements.

J. TrashlRecycling
The proposed project includes two trash/recycling enclosures that are centrally located on the project si[e. As part of their valet service, the Folsom Ranch Apartments maintenanie staff will be responsible for collecting trash and recycling from outside the door of each individual apartment unit on a nightly basis and transporting it to the designated trash/recycling enclosures. Staff recommends that the final location, design, rat&ials, and colors of the trash/recycling enclosures be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. Condition No. 42 is included to reflectthese requirements.

K. Existing and Proposed Landscaping
The rectangular shaped 15.8-acre project site, which has previously been mass graded, contains non-native grasses. There are no trees or other significant vegetation are present on the project site. The proposed project will include landscaping along the project's four street frontages and also landscaping interior to the project site. A landscape buffer (includes sidewalk) is proposed along each street frontage including an 18-foot-wide buffer along Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, Placerville Road, and McCarthy Way.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
As shown on the landscape plans (Attachment 9), the applicant is proposing to install landscaping that features California-native and low water-use trees, shrubs, and groundcover selections intended to comply with the requirements of the Model Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). Proposed landscape improvements include a variety of drought-tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Among the proposed trees are; Bird of Paradise, Black Oak, California Bay, California Sycamore, Chinese Fringe, Coast Live Oak, Crape Myrtle, Cypress, Desert Willow, Evergreen Elm, and Glory Maple.

Proposed shrubs and groundcover include; Berkeley Sedge, Cape Rush, Caroline Cherry, Deer Grass, Dwarf Bottlebrush, Fortnight Lily, Japanese Barberry,Japanese Boxwood, Purple Delight, Silver Streak Flax Lily, Stoke Holly, and White Shrub Rose.

The preliminary landscape plan meets the City shade requirement (4Oo/o) by providing 55% shade in the parking lot area within fifteen (15) years. lt should be noted that the project fails to comply with city standards for minimum planter width requirements for several of the trees proposed within the interior site design, resulting in dubious long-term success of the trees proposed therein. ln order to balance space constraints with the realistic needs of trees to reasonably be expected to grow successfully to maturity, staff recommends the applicant retain a project arborist versed in urban land development through the duration of the project and that the final landscape plans be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. Condition Nos. 32-34 are included to reflect these requirements.

L. Frontage lmprovements
Existing improvements to Alder Creek Parkway (adjacent to project site) include undergnound utilities, three travel lanes, bicycle lanes, and a raised median for landscaping. lmprovements to Westwood Drive, McCarthy Way, and Mercy Drive are currently under construction as part of the Folsom Ranch Medical Center project. lmprovements to Westwood Drive include underground utilities, four travel lanes, bicycle lanes, streetlights, curbs, and gutters. lmprovements to Mercy Drive include underground utilities, three travel lanes, a landscape median, streetlights bicycle lanes, curbs, and gutters. lmprovements to McCarthy Way include underground utilities, two travel lanes, i landscape median, streetlights, bicycle lanes, curbs, and gutters. The owner/applicant will be required to install sidewalks, landscaping, retaining walls, and site fencing along the street frontages of Alder Creek Parkway, Westwood Drive, McCarthy Way, Mercy Drive, and Placerville Road. With respect to Placerville Road, the owner/applicant will also be required to construct the entire intersection of Placerville Road and McCarthy Way and the western half of the roadway between McCarthy Way and Westwood Drive.

The recommended conditions of approval require the applicant to submit detailed plans for all sidewalks, landscaping, streetlights, retaining walls, and site fencing prior to construction to ensure compliance with City standards (Condition No. 18).

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
M. Minor Administrative Modification (Transfer of Development Rights) The project site, which consists of two separate parcels (FPASP Parcel 85A-3 and 85- A4), is designated by the FPASP for the development of 122 MMD residential units, 221, MHD residential units, and 3.3 acres of parkland (PARK). Based on the fact that the applicant is proposing to construct 238 MMD residential units on the prolect site, a Minor Administrative Modification is being requested for the transfer of development rights to move 221 MHD units from the project site to Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan Area, to move 1 16 MMD units from Parcel 61 to the project site, and to move 3.3-acres of parkland (PARK) from the project site to Parcel 61. The exhibit shown on the following page contains the existing and proposed reallocation of units within the Folsom Plan Area as proposed by the subject Minor Administrative Modifications.

FIGURE 13: MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION EXHIBIT
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan provides for Minor Administrative Modifications, " ... that are consistent with and do not substantially change its overall intent, such as minor adjustments to the land use locations and parcel boundaries shown in Figure 4.1 - Land Use and Figure 4.4 - Plan Area Parcels and the land use acreages shown in Tabte 4.1 - Land Use Summary." [FPASP ; r.,lr.
t1'
//-
PARCEL 85A

EXISIING
AuocAfloN:

MlD OdU
tilMD l22du
I HD 221 du
PAIK 3.3dc
RC 106,0009E1
GC 406,620gst
INDIOP l09.380gst

PROPOSED
ATIOCAIION:

MIO odu
MMO 238d0
MHO odu
PAIX 0.0oc
RC l06.0mgsf
GC 406,6?0grr
IND/OP 109.3809sf
PARCET 6I
EXISllNG
AI[OCAIION:

MtD l98clt,
MMD l98du
i HO t56du
fAnK 5.6ac
RC 253.2.159s,
GC 55,1 lSgsr
|ND/OP 2l 6,01,195f

PSOPOSED
AttocAnoN:

MLD 198du
filMD 82du
MHb 377du
PARK 8-9ac
RC 253,24$gsr
GC 55,1 lSgsl
IND/OP 2!6,0l.fgsf
'.' '61
- PASF Pad {dtut
' k Trr. a 3hrffi &9a t
I
)
u-'
!.a)
$
Dwelling L nir r\ llocolron
Folsom Plan Areu Specific Plnn
ffiniOOfennfs t,,n.. r.b. r.rr
*t.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Section 13.31
Minor administrative modifications can be approved at a staff level, provided the following criteria are met:
. The proposed modification is within the Plan Area.
. The modification does not reduce the size of the proposed town center. . The modification retains compliance with City Charter Article 7.08, previously known as Measure W.
o The general land use pattern remains consistent with the intent and spirit of the FPASP
. The proposed changes do not substantially alter the backbone infrastructure network.
. The proposed modification offers equal or superior improvements to development capacity or standards.
. The proposed modification does not increase environmental impacts beyond those identified in the EIR/EIS.
. Relocated park or school parcels continue to meet the standards for the type of park or school ProPosed.
o Relocated park or school parcels remain within walking distance of the residents they serve.

As mentioned previously, the proposed project includes a request for approval of a Minor Administrative Modificaiion to transfer development rights among one of the subject parcels and other multi-use parcels located in the Folsom Plan Area. The FPASP permits ilexibility in transferring residential unit allocations to reflect changing market demand.

The FpASP states that-"the City shallapprove residentialdwelling unit allocation transfers or density adjustments between any Plan Area resident land parcel or parcels, provided the following conditions are met":
o The transferor and transferee parcel or parcels are located in the Plan Area and are designated for residential use.
o The transferor and transferee parcel or parcels conform to all applicable development standards contained in Appendix A - Development Standards. . The transfer of units does not result in increased impacts beyond those identified iN thc FPASP EIR/EIS
o The transfer of units does not adversely impact planned infrastructure, roadways, schools, or other public facilities; affordable housing agreements; or fee programs and assessment districts; unless such impacts are reduced to an acceptable level through project-specific mitigation measures.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Based on staffs review, the proposed reallocation of 221 MHD residential units from the project site to another parcel within the Folsom Plan Area and the reallocation of 116 MMD residential units from Parcel6l within the Folsom Plan Area to the project site, meet all of the required criteria mentioned above.

The project site was included in the Housing Element's Residential Sites lnventory as a vacant Lower lncome Site and was assigned an allocation of 221 lower income units (MHD). This MAM will not change that, except to move the designated units from the subject property to Parcel 61. To help ensure that construction of lower income units is realized, the development agreement amendment discussed above documents Landowner's commitment to provide 64 deed restricted lower income units within Parcel

61. The City has no explicit authority to require the applicant, or any developer, to construct affordable housing, so Landowner's agreement to voluntarily deed restrict 64 units is an important component of this project and supports the City's recommendation for approval. Accordingly, the City does not object to transferring the 221 MHD units from the subject property to Parcel 61 via the requested MAM, or transferring 166 MMD units from Parcel 61 to this site.

The Minor Administrative Modification also includes a proposal to move 3.3-acres of parkland (PARK) from the project site to Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan Area. The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan created a placeholder for the development of a 3.3-acre local park (LP-3) near the intersection of East Bidwell Street and Alder Creek Parkway.

The Specific Plan also created a placeholder for the development of a 5.6-acre neighborhood park (NP-6) on Parcel 61 near the intersection of East Bidwell Street and Alder Creek Parkway. The Minor Administrative Modification would result in the 3.3-acres of local park area being combined with the 5.6-acres of neighborhood park area to create a larger 8.9-acre neighborhood park (NP-6) within Parcel 61 (See FPASP Section 4 Land Use for more detail regarding park allocation to Parcels 85A, 61 ,77, and 78.). Per the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the final size of this neighborhood park will be determined by the total number of residential units in Parcel 61 & Parcel 85A. The Parks and Recreation Department reviewed the proposed modification to the park site and determined that a larger neighborhood park within Parcel 61 would be more beneficial to the City and its residents than two smaller parks from a planning, programming, and mai nte nance perspective.

As a result, staff is able to approve the proposed Minor Administrative Modifications for the transfer of development rights and the transfer of parkland as proposed by the applicant.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
N. Conformance with Relevant General Plan and Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Goals and Policies
The recently approved City of Folsom 2035 General Plan outlines a number of goals, policies, and implementation programs designed to guide the physical, economic, and environmentalgrowth of the City. ln addition, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan includes goals and policies intended to ensure successful development within the Folsom Plan Area. Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with both the General plan and Specific Plan goals and policies. The following is a summary analysis of the project's consistency with the Folsom General Plan and with key policies of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

Retain and enhance Folsom's quality of life, unique identity, and sense of communitY while continuing to grow and change.

GP POLICY LU 1.1.12-1 (lnfill Development)
Newdevelopmentshouldimprovethecharacterand
connectivity of the neighborhood in which it occurs. Physical design should respond to the scale and features of the surrounding community, while improving critical elements such as transparency and permeability.

Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project teatrres significant site and design improvements which will enhance the overall character of the area including introducing new upscale apartment units with a contemporary Spanish Colonial residential design intended to compliment the design of approved residential and commercial developments in the vicinity.

GP POL cY LU 1.1.15 ( Blueorint P )
Strive to adhere to the Sacramento Reg ional Blueprint Growth Principles.

Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project has Oeen Oesigned to adhere to the primary SACOG Blueprint Principles including Compact Development, Housing Choice and Diversity, Use of Existing Assets, and euatity Design. Compact Development involves creating environments that are more iompa-tly Ouitt and use space in an efficient but attractive manner and helps to encourage more walking, biking, and transit use and shorter auto trips. Housing Choice and Diversity includes providing a variety of places where people can live (apartments, townhomes, condominiums, and single-family detached homes) and also creating opportunities for the variety of people who need them such as families, singles, seniors, and people with special needs. Use of Existing Assets entails inteniification of the existing use or redevelopment in order to make better use of existing public infrastructure, including roads. Quality Design focuses on the design details of any land development (such as relationship to the street,

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
placement of buildings, sidewalks, street widths, landscaping, etc.), which are all factors that influence the attractiveness of living in a compact development and facilitate the ease of walking within and in and out of a community.

GP GOAL H-2 (Removinq Barriers to the Production of Hgusingl onStraintSonthedevelopmentofhousingforhouseholdsof
all income levels.

GP POLI cY H 2.7
The City shall educate the community on the needs, the realities, and the benefits of affordable and higher-density housing.

Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project will resgtt in development of a 238-unit multi-family medium density apartment community with a residential densi$ of 15 units per acre.

GP GOAL M 4.1 (Vehicle Traffic and Parkinq)
ffiicientnetworkofstreetsforcarandtrucks,aswellasprovidean adequate supply of vehicle parking.

GP POLICY M 4.1.3 (Level of Service)
Stlr/e to acftieve a least traffic Level of Service "D" (or better) for local streets and roadways throughout the City. ln designing transportation improvements, the City will prioritize use of smart technologies and innovative solutions that maximize efficiencies and safety while minimizing the physical footprint. During the course of Plan buildout, it may occur that temporarily higher Levels of Service result where roadway improvements have not been adequately phased as development proceeds. However, this situation will be minimized based on annual traffic studies and monitoring programs. Staff will report to the City Council at regular intervals via the Capital improvement Program process for the Council to prioritize project integralto achieving Level of Service D or better.

Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project will not result in a change in the level of service (LOS) at any of the seven study intersections. ln addition, the proposed project, while not technically subject to the VMT req u irement as d iscussed earlier with in the Traffic/Access/Circu lation Section of this staff report, will result in a negligible change in VMT when compared to the existing FPASP.

GP GOAL 4.2 (Vehicle Traffic a d Parkino)
Provide and manage a balanced approach to parking that meets economic development and sustainability goals.

GP POLICY M 4.2.4 (Electric Vehicle Charqinq Stations)
Encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations in parking spaces throughout the city, prioritizing installations at multi-family residential units.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project inCtuOes electric vehicle charging infrastructure in each of the 476 covered garage parking spaces and 36 open parking spaces with be wired to be electric vehicle capable for future charging stations. The number of proposed electric vehicle charging station is consistent with the California Green Buildings Standards Code's provisions for multi-family residential development.

GP GOAL LU 6.1 (Residential Neiqhborhoods)
nttow for a varienr of housing types and mix of uses that provide choices for Folsom residents, create complete and livable neighborhoods, and encourage walking and biking.

GP POLICY LU 6.1.3 (Efficiency through Density)
Support an overall increase in average residential densities in identified urban centers and mixed-use districts. Encourage new housing types to shift from lower-density, large- lot developments to higher-density, small-lot, and multifamily developments, as a means to increase energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce waste, as well as increase access to services and amenities (e.g., open space) through an emphasis of mixed uses in these h ig her-density developments.

Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project is prcvtdng an upscale multi-family residential project developed at a residential density of 15 units per acre. According to the applicant, upscale apartments are considered an underserved segment of the rental housing market in Folsom today based on their market research. The proposed prolect design also incorporates sustainable features (mechanical, electrical, plumbing, HVAC systems, and rooftop solar panel systems) that are consistent with California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). The applicant is also proposing to use cool pavement features at the vehicle entrances on the project site. ln addition, the applicant is also considering participating in the SMUD Neighborhood Solar Shares program.

Conformance with Relevant Specific Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan identifies a number of goals, objectives, and policies designed to guide the physical, economic, and environmental growth of the Specific Plan Area. Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Specific Plan goals, objectives, and policies as outlined and discussed below:

SP OBJECTIVE H-l (Housinq)
@plyofsuitablesitesforthedevelopmentofarangeofhousing
types to meet the housing needs of all segments of the population.

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
GP SP POLICY H-'l 1
The City shall ensure that sufficient land is designated and zoned in a range of residential densities to accommodate the city's regional share of housing.

Analysis: The City provides residential lands at a variety of residential densities as specitied in thedeneral Plan and in the Folsom Municipal Code. The Folsom plan Area Specific Plan includes specialized zoning (Specific Plan Designations) that are cusiomized to the Plan Area as adopted in 2011 and as Amended over time. The FPASP provides residential lands at densities ranging from 1-4 dwelling unit per acre (SF), 4-7 dwelling units per acre (SFHD), 7-12 dwelling units per acre (MLb), 12-20 dwelling units per acre (MMD), 20-30 dwelling units per acre (MHD), and 9-30 dwelling units per acre (MU). As stated previously, the Folsom Ranch Apartments project will be developed at 15-units per acre, which is within the allowed density range for the MMD designation.

SP POLICY 4.1
Create peOestrian-oriented neighborhoods through the use of a grid system of streets where feasible, sidewalks, bike paths and trails. Residential neighborhoods shall be linked, where appropriate, to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel.

Analvsis: The Folsom Ranch Apartments project proposes a multi-family apartrnent community with an interconnected system of local streets provided with pedestrian walkways and sidewalks. Sidewalks will be provided along all street irontages with muliiple pedestrian connections provided between the project site and the adjacent sidewalks. Bicycle circulation is provided by Class ll bicycle lanes with connectivi$ to nearby neighborhoods, parks, schools, and open space trails that have Class I bicYcle trails.

SP POLICY 4.6
As established by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the total number of dwelling units for the Plan Areashall not exceed 11,461. The number of units within individual land use parcels may vary, so long as the number of units falls within the allowable densi$ range for a particular land use designation.

Analvsis: There have been a number of Specific Plan Amendments approved by tne CitV Council within the Folsom Plan Area, which has generally led to an increase in residentially zoned land and a decrease in commercially zoned land.

As a result, the number of residential units within the Plan Area increased from 10,210 to 11,461. The various Specific Plan Amendment ElRs and Addendums analyzed impacts from the conversion of the commercial lands to residential lands; impacts and associated mitigations measures can be found in the individual project-specific environmental documents. While the proposed project will result in a decrease in the number of dwelling units that were anticipated to be constructed on the project site (decrease from 343 to 238 dwelling units), this is offset by the reallocation of dwelling units with Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Area as described in the Minor Administrative Modification section of this staff report. The reallocation of units among these parcels will not exceed the allowable density for the parcels. ln addition, the proposed project does not result in any change in total dwelling units (1 1,461 dwelling units) in the FPASP.

SP OBJECTIVE 7.1 (Circulation)
ffirniaCompleteStreetsActof2008andtheSustainable
Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375), create a safe and efficient circulation system for all modes of travel.

SP POLICY 7.1
The roadway network in the Plan Area shall be organized in a grid-like pattern of streets and blocks, except where topography and natural features make it infeasible, for the majorig of the Plan Area in order to create neighborhoods that encourage walking, biking, public transit, and other alternative modes of transportation' Analvsis: Consistent with the requirements of the California Complete Streets Act, *" pp45e identifled and planned for hierarchy of connect "complete streets" to ensure that pedestrian, bike, bus, and automobile modes are travel are designed to have direct and continuous connections throughout the Plan Area. Every option, from regional connector roadways to arterial and local streets, has been carefully planned and designed. Recent California legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (AB 32 and SB 375) has resulted in an increased market demand for public transit and housing located closer to service needs and employment centers. ln response to these changes, the FPASP includes a regional transit corridor that will provide public transportation links between the major commercial, public, and multi-family residential land uses in the Plan Area.

The Folsom Ranch Apartments project has been designed with multiple modes of transportation options (vehicles, bicycle, walking, access to transit) and internal drive aisles organized in a pattern consistentwith the approved FPASP circulation Plan.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that residential projects which are consistent with an approved Specific Plan for which an EIR was prepared are exempt from a requirement to prepare additional environmental analysis. CEQA Guidelines section 15182(c) provides specific criteria to determine whether this exemption applies:
(c) Residential Proiects lmplementing Specific Plans-
(1) Etigibitity. Where a pubtic agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1gAO, a residential project undertaken pursuantto and in conformityto that specific

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
ptan is exempt from CEQA if the project meets the requirements of this section.

Residentiat projects covered by this section include but are not limited to land subdivisions, zoning changes, and residential planned unit developments. [CEOA Guidelines section 151821
The applicant has prepared an analysis (included as Attachment 20 to this staff report), which determined that the Folsom Ranch Apartments project qualifies for the exemption provided in CEQA Guidelines 15182(c), since it is consistent with the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan. An analysis of the project's consistency with the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan has been provided by the applicant and is included as Attachment 20 to this staff report.

The applicant's analysis also includes a review of the impacts and mitigation measures addressed in the EIR for the FPASP, which concluded that the project will not result in any impacts not already identified, and that mitigation measures in the EIR will be sufficient to address project impacts. None of the events described in CEQA Guidelines 11162which would require preparation of a subsequent EIR (substantial changes to the project, substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, or new information of substantial performance) have occurred, as detailed in the CEQA Exemption Analysis (Attachment 18 to this staff report).

The City has reviewed the applicant's analysis and concurs that the pro;ect is exempt from additional environmental review as provided in CEQA Guidelines 15182(c).

RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Staff recommends approvalof this project, based upon to the Findings below and subject to the conditions of approval attached to this report.
o Approve the CEQA Exemption for the proposed project pursuant to Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines section 15182(c), and r Approve a Conditional Use Permit for development and operation of a market-rate paired, townhouse-style apartment community on the subject 15.8-acre property, and Approve a Planned Development Permit which contains detailed development and architectural standards for the proposed 238-unit residential apartment community as described in this report and the attached conditions of approval, and lApprove [SOa]a MinorAdministrative Modification to transfer 116 MMD allocated units from Parcel 61 to the subject parcel (Parcel 85A), to transfer 221 MHD allocated units from the subject parcel (Parcel 85A) to Parcel 61 , and to transfer 3.3-acres of Parkland o

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
from the subject parcel (Parcel 85A) to Parcel 61 within the Folsom Plan Area, and Move to recommend that the City Council:
. Approve a Development Agreement Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement to deed restrict 64 affordable housing units on a portion of the Remainder within Parcel 61 in the Folsom Plan Area.

These approvals and recommendations are based on the proposed findings below (Findings A-U) and subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Conditions 1-46) attached to this report.

GENERAL FINDINGS
A. NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND CITY CODE.

B. THE PROJECT IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AS AMENDED AND THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS AMENDED.

CEQA FINDINGS
C. THE CITY, AS LEAD AGENCY, PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED AN

E NVI RON M E NTAL I M PACT RE PO RT/E NVI RON M E NTAL I M PACT STATEMENT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT THE FOLSOM RANCH APARTMENTS

PROJECT IS UNDERTAKEN TO IMPLEMENT AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT THE IMPACTS OF THE FOLSOM RANCH

APARTMENTS PROJECT ARE ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY THE FINAL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA

SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATION MEASURES AND THAT THE FOLSOM RANCH APARTMENTS PROJECT 1S EXEMPT FROM THE

REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65457 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15182(c)'

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT NONE OF THE EVENTS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 21166 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE OR SECTION 15162 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES HAVE OCCURRED.

D
E.

F

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
G
H
J
K.

L.

M

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65457 AND SECTION 15182 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT F]NqNq

AS CONDITIONED, THE ESTABLISHMENT, MAINTENANCE OR OPERATION

OF THE USE APPLIED FOR WILL NOT, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF

THIS PARTICULAR CASE, BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY,

PEACE, MORALS, COMFORT, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF PERSONS

RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, OR BE DETRIMENTAL

OR INJURIOUS TO PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE

NEIGHBORHOOD OR TO THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY, AS THE

PROPOSED USE IS COMPLIMENTARY TO EXISTING USES IN THE

PROJECT VICINITY AND, AS CONDITIONED, THE PROPOSED PROJECT

WILL NOT HAVE NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO NEARBY USES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN MITIGATED.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS
I. THE PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE INTENT AND PURPOSES

OF THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS AMENDED AND OTHER

APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY AND THE GENERAL PLAN AS AMENDED.

THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE

OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE CITY. THE MINOR MODIFICATION TO THOSE

STANDARDS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT WILL RESULT IN A

DEVELOPMENT THAT IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OBTAINED BY THE RIGID APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS.

THE PHYSICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND VISUAL COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN THE

PROPOSED PROJECT AND EXISTING AND FUTURE ADJACENT USES AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS IS ACCEPTABLE.

AS CONDITIONED, THE PROJECT WILL MAKE AVAILABLE NECESSARY

PUBLIC FACILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WATER, SEWER

AND DRAINAGE, AND THE PROJECT WILL ADEQUATELY PROVIDE FOR THE FURNISHING OF SUCH FACILITIES.

THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACTS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN MITIGATED TO AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023

THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE VEHICULAR

TRAFFIC LEVELS ON SURROUNDING ROADWAYS, AND THE PROPOSED

PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE INTERNAL CIRCULATION, INCLUDING INGRESS AND EGRESS.

THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH,

SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PERSONS OR PROPERTY
WTHIN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SITE, AND THE CIry AS A WHOLE

ADEQUATE PROVISION IS MADE FOR THE FURNISHING OF SANITATION SERVICES AND EMERGENCY PUBLIC SAFEry SERVICES TO THE
DEVELOPMENT.

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT FINDINGS
O. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE

OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, GENERAL LAND USES AND PROGRAMS

SPECIFIED IN THE CITY GENERAL PLAN (AS AMENDED) AND THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (AS AMENDED).

R. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH

PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, GENERAL WELFARE, AND GOOD LAND USE
PRACTICES.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND
RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE

DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF

PERSONS RESIDING IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA, NOR BE DETRIMENTAL OR

INJURIOUS TO PROPERTY OR PERSONS IN THE GENERAL

NEIGHBORHOOD OR TO THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY AS A WHOLE.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND
RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL NOT ADVERSELY

AFFECT THE ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY OR THE
PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY VALUES.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND

RESTATED TIER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65864 THROUGH
65869.5.

N
o
P
T
U
S

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments (MSTR 22-00218)
February 15,2023
Attachment 4
Conditions of ApProval

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments
February 15,2023

PARKWAY

PERMIT,
ARTMENTSAP PROJECTF'OLSOMTHE RANCII (MSTRAPPROVotr' FORALCONDITIONS DRJVEwEsTwooDCREEKALDER ANDINTERSECTIONTIIE or'CORNERNORTIIWEST OF ANI)MODI['ICAADMINISTRATIVE TIONPERMIT MINORDEVELOPMENTPLANNEDUSECONDITIONAL When
Required
Responsible
DepartmentMitigation
Measure
Condition of ApProval
Condition
No.

G, I,B CD (PXE)
submit final site development plans to the Community
that shall substantially conform to the exhibits referenced l. Preliminary Site Plan, dated October 19,2022

2. Preliminary Utility Plans, dated October 19,2022

3. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plans, dated October 19,2022

4. Preliminary Landscape Plan and Details, dated October 13'2022

5. Preliminary Access and Circulation Plan, October 13'2022

6. Preliminary Fence and Wall Plan, dated October 73,2022

7. Preliminary Lighting Plan and Details, dated October,2022

8. Building Elevations and Floor Plans, dated October 14,2022

9. Color Renderings, dated October 14,2022

10. Color and Materials Board, dated October 14,2022

11. Minor Administrative Modification Exhibits, dated July 29,2022

12. Folsom Ranch Apartrnents Booklet (Separate Bound Document)

13. Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between the city of Folsom and Eagle commercial Partners, LLC relative to the Folsom South SPecific Plan

14. Transportation Impact Study, dated October 6,2022

15. CEQA Exemption and Streanrlining Analysis and Checklist, dated October, 2022

16. Folsom Ranch Apartnents Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Prograrn The conditional use Permit, Planned Development Permit, and Minor Administrative The owner/applicant
Development Department
multi-238-unitaofandare theforModification op€ratrondevelopmentapproved oftheRanchresidential Implementation projectApartrnents).(Folsomfamily project and conditionsthesethewith abovebeshall
below:

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments
February 15,2023
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL F'OR TIIE FOLSOM RANCH APARTMENTS PROJEC'T (MSTR 22-I}O2TE)

NORTIIWEST CORNEROF TITE INTERSECTION OFALDERCREEK PARI(WAY AND WESTWOOD I'RWE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PLAI{NED DEVELOPMENT PtrNMIT, MINOR N)MINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION, AND

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMNNDMENT
Condition
No.

Mitigation
Measure
Condition ofApproval When
Required
Responsible
Department

2. Building plans, and all civil engineering, improvement, landscape, and irrigation plans, shall be submitted to the Community Development Departrnent for review and approval to ensure conformance with this approval and with relevant codes, policies, standards and other requirements of the City of Folsom.

G, I,B CD (PXEXB)
t The project approvals granted under this staffreport (Conditional Use Permit and Planned Development Permit) shall remain in effect for two years from final date of approval (February 15,2025). Failure to obtain the relevant building (or other) permits within this time period, without the subsequent extension of this approval, shall result in the termination of this approval. The Minor Administrative Modification (MAM) does not have an expiration date. The Development Agreement Amendment, which is subiect to review and approval by the CiW Council, is valid until June 30, 2056 B cD (P)

03/14/2023 Item No.14.

Planning Commission
Folsom Ranch Apartments
February 15,2023

APPROVAL

MODIFICATION,
PROJECTAP,ARTMENTSFOLSOMTHE RANCH T2-00218\(MSTRor' ['oRCONDITIONS wEsTwooDAND DRTVECREEKALDER APARI(W YOFINTERSECTIONOFCORNER THENORTHWEST ANDADMINISTRATIVEPDRMIT MINORDEVELOPMENTPLAI\[NEI)PER"VIITUSECONDITIONAL When
Required
Responsible
Department
Condition ofApproval
Condition
No.

Mitigation
Measure

CD (PXEXB)

PW, PR, FD,
PD
OG
City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate
action or proceeding ifboth ofthe following occur:

The City bears its own attomey's fees and costs; and
The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith a
a
holdand theharmless and itsCityThe shall indemnifrdefend,protect,owner/applicant the ororactionfrom against Cityandoflicers any claim, proceedingemployeesagents, theset or annulorofficers to aside, voi4 byany approvalattack,its agents, employees orolficers,or itsof employees,agents,cofilmlsslons,departrnents,City any agencres, oractionthe broughtwhich claim, proceedingmnceming project,bodylegislative of7Governmentln 66499.3Code Sectionthereforethewithin tme period provided thewillThe notiffvof limitation.statutes promptlCityother applicable will ln theoraction andof cooperate firllysuch claim, proceeding,owner/applicant any them the ownerfailshould to defense,If thedefense. tullyCity cooperate holdandtonotshall bethereafter indemniffdefend,responsibleowner/applicant thisto condition. Theandthe itsor officers, pursuantharmless employees,agents,City theln ofdefense such claim,any
suchofto settlementornotshall anybe required pay performThe owner/applicant thesettlementthe lsoraction unless by owner/applicant.approvedclaim, proceeding shall ofthisunder conditionThe apply regardlessobligationsowner/applicant's with thistols recordedwhether Final respect project.Map ultimately

4. B CD (E)
the
theof AmendedFirst andallwithThe shall comply provrsronsowner/applicant andNo.Amendments and t thereto, anyTierRestated Development Agreement, ofand thebetween and thethereafteramendments City owner/applicantbyapproved 5