Folsom City Council
October 24, 2023

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
land as its primary function , the Conservation
Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation
organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 815.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City or County, after consultation with DFG. The City, or County, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form ofthe conservation easement.

The City, or County, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the
easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

The project applicant(s), after consultation with the City, or County ofjurisdiction, DFG, and the Conservation Operator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial
mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement of the
conservation easement. If an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City's jurisdiction or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin to be distributed to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-parly nonprofit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity. The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest ofany conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior written approval of the City and DFG. Mitigation lands established or acquired for impacts incuned at the off-site detention basin shall require approval from Sacramento County prior to sale or transfer of mitigation lands or conservation easement.

Ifthe Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transfened to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG, or Sacramento County and DFG depending on jurisdiction of the affected habitat. The City Planning Department shall ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City's plannins area is properly established and is Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
rvith this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
any ground-disturbing
activity within 500 feet
of suitable nesting
habitat as applicable
for all project phases.
functioning as habitat by reviewing regular monitoring reports prepared by the Conservation Operator of the mitigation site(s)' Monitoring of the rnitigation site(s) shall continue for the first 10 years after establishment of the easement and shall be funded through the endowment, or other appropriate funding mechanism, established by the project applicant($. Sacramento County shall review the monitoring reports for impacts on habitat at the off-site detention basin.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant($ of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County and Caltrans).

Avoid and Minimize Inpacts to Tricolored Blackbird
Nesting Colonies. To avoid and minimize impacts to tricolored blackbird, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall conduct a preconstruction survey for any project activity that would occur during the tricolored blackbird's nesting season (March l-August 31). The preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist before any activity occuning within 500 feet of suitable nesting habitat, including freshwater marsh and areas of riparian scrub vegetation. The survey shall be conductedwithin 14 days before project activity begins.

If no tricolored blackbird colony is present, no further mitigation is required. If a colony is found, the qualified biologist shall establish a buffer around the nesting colony' No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active, The size of the buffer shall be determined in consultation with DFG. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature ofthe project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, and other relevant
circumstances.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom' s j urisdictional boundaries (i.e., U. S. 50 interchange improvements) developed by the project applicant( s) of each
must be
consultation with the affected
3A.3-2c
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-16
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
Before the approval of
any ground-disturbing
activity within 500 feet
of suitable nesting
habitat as applicable
for all project phases.

Before the approval of
any grading or
improvement plans,
before any ground
oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans) and must be sufficient to achieve the performance criteria described above.

Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts.

The project applicant of all project phases containing potential bat roosting habitat shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for roosting bats. Surveys shall be conducted in the fall to determine if the mine shaft is used as a hibernaculum and in spring and/or summer to determine if it is used as a maternity or day roost. Surveys shall consist ofevening emergence surveys to note the presence or absence ofbats and could consist of visual surveys at the time of emergence. If evidence of bat use is observed, the number and species of bats using the roost shall be determined. Bat detectors may be used to supplement survey efforts. Ifno bat roosts are found, then no further study shall be required.

Ifroosts ofpallid bat or Torvnsend's big-eared bats are determined to be present and must be removed, the bats shall be excluded from the roosting site. A mitigation program
addressing compensation, exclusion methods, and roost
removal procedures shall be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation. Exclusion methods may include use ofone-way doors at roost entrances (bats may leave but not reenter), or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be
restricted during periods ofsensitive activity (e,g., during hibernation or while females in matemity colonies are nursing young), The loss of each roost (if any) will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction and
installation of bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.

Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal
Pool Invertebrates and Implement All Permit Condifions.

No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for Federally listed vernal invertebrates. 3A.3-2d
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.3-2g
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-t1
71-18
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

District;U.S.

Fish and
Wildlife
Service; and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
or within adequate buffer areas
deemed suffi ciently protective
(250 feet or lesser distance
by a qualified biologist with
approval from USFWS), until a biological opinion (BO) or Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) letter has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development entitlements affecting such areas have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site construction. Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation
describing methods to protect existing vernal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1a, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss ofvernal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation ofhabitat, account for the temporal loss ofhabitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards are not met.

The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vernal pool habitat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss of acreage, function, and value of affected vernal pool habitat, The final habitat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of 404 Permits for Projects with Relatively Small Effects on Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction of the Sacramento Field Office, California (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an
alternative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat acteage,
function, and value.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application "potentially affecting vernal pool habitat" shall ensure that there is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and restoration ofvernal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health' This standard shall be the ect
disturbing activities
within 250 feet of said
habitat or lesser
distance deemed
suffi ciently protective
by a qualified biologist
with approval from
USFWS, and on an
ongoing basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for all
project phases as
required by the
mitigation plan, BO,
and/or BMPs.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
applicant(s) for any discretionary development application affecting vernal pool or seasonal rvetland habitat to identiff the extent ofindirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identif,ing all such habitat within 250 feet of project construction activities or by providing an alternative technical evaluation. Ifa lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant($ shall preserve acreage ofvernal pool habitat for each wetted acre ofany indirectly affectedvernal pool habitat ataratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion of the Section 7
consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet of the habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS. The project applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for direct or indirect impacts that have already been mitigated to the satisfaction of USFWS through another BO or mitigation plan (i.e., if impacts on specific habitat acreage are mitigated by one project phase or element, the project applicant($ will not be required to mitigate for it again in another phase ofthe project).

A standard set of BMPs shall be applied to construction occuning in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USFWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land" for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase in
consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
rvas verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
ofFish and
Game and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any construction
activities (including
clearing and grubbing)
that affect the bed and
bank or riparian and
freshwater marsh
habitat associated with
Alder Creek and other
on-site or off-site
drainage channels and
ponds.

Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4a: Secure and Implemenf
Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a Section 1602 streambed alteration agreement from DFG for all construction activities that would occur in the bed and bank ofAlder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds on the SPA. As a condition of issuance of the streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting riparian habitat shall hire a qualified restoration ecologist to prepare a riparian habitat MMP. The draft MMP shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or
compensate for impacts on the stream channel of Alder Creek and other drainage channels within DFG jurisdiction, and the bed and banks of the on-site ponds. Mitigation measures may include establishment or restoration of riparian habitat within the project's open space areas along preserved stream corridors, riparian habitat restoration off-site, or preservation and enhancement of existing riparian habitat either on or off the SPA. The compensation habitat shall be similar in composition and structure to the habitat to be removed and shall be at ratios adequate to offset the loss ofriparian habitat functions and services at the SPA. The riparian habitat compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
> compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites;
> complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
> site-specific management procedures to benefit
establishment and maintenance of native riparian plant
species, including black willow, arroyo willow, white
alder, and Fremont cottonwood;
> a planting and irrigation program ifneeded for
establishment of native riparian trees and shrubs at
strategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and not be if of
3A.3-4a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-19
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
functioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or if restoration can be accomplished without irrigation or
planting);
> in kind reference habitats for comparison with
compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and
success criteria) to document success;
> monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be
monitored for a minimum period of five years);
> ecological performance standards, based on the best
available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount of dead woody vegetation gaps and bare ground, and
survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation
planting sites must achieve 80% survival of planted
riparian trees and shrubs by the end ofthe five'year
maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying
trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
> corrective measures if performance standards are not met; > responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and
> responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for veriffing success or prescribing implementation or
corrective actions.

Any conditions of issuance of the Streambed Alteration
Agreement shall be implemented as part of project construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage
channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval ofany grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site channels
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.
under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and riparian habitat.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase with the Caltrans.

Conduct Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass
Grasslandl Implement Avoidance and Minimization
Measures or Compensatory Mitigation. The project
applicant($ ofall project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine ifvalley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concunently with any special-status plant surveys
conducted on site as special-status plant surveys are floristic in nature, i.e. require that all species encountered be identifred, and require preparation of a plant community map. If valley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report to the City of Folsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any ofthe off-site project elements.

Ifvalley needlegrass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent of the community shall be mapped and the acreage of this community type, if any, that would be removed by project implementation shall be calculated. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application affecting valley needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City of Folsom to determine appropriate mitigation for removal of valley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation. Mitigation measures shall include one or more of the following components sufficient to achieve no net loss ofvalley needlegrass grassland acreage:
establishment of valley needlegrass grassland within project's open space areas currently characterized by annual grassland, establishment of valley needlegrass grassland off-site, or preservation and enhancement of existing valley needlegrass grassland either on or offthe SPA. The applicant($ shall for loss of
3A.3-4b
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
1t-20
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe owner/applicant
obtained a Tree Permit
from the Community
Development
Department for the
removal of protected
oak trees that were
impacted by the
grading and
construction of Phase
3 of the Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch
project.

The Tree Permit was
approved prior to
commencement of
grading and
construction in the
Summer of 2022.The
owner/applicant paid
in-lieu fees for the
removal of some trees,
the City approved a
Tree Replacement
Plan for another
portion of the tree that
were removed and
preserved existing oak
trees in El Dorado
County for the
remaining mitigation
for the total number of
trees in
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase
containing protected
trees or oak woodland.
resulting from project implementation at a minimum l:1
replacement ratio.

Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak
Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees
Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize
Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees Retained On Site. The
project applicant($ shall prepare an oak woodland mitigation and monitoring plan. The project applicant(s) ofall on- and off- site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or
individual trees shall adhere to the requirements described below, which are consistent with those outlined in California Public Resources Code 21083.4. Pursuant to Sacramento
County General Plan policy, the acreage ofoak woodland
habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculated as the oak tree canopy area within stands of oak trees having greater thanl0% cover plus a 30-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge ofthe tree canopy. Oak trees located in areas greater than 30 feet from stands meeting the greater thanl0% tree canopy cover criterion were
considered isolated trees and not part ofthe blue oak woodland community. Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below.
> Preserve approximately 399 acres ofexisting oak
woodland habitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion ofground verification by a qualified arborist, the actual amount of oak woodland present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount
preserved could also be slightly greater or lesser than399 acres).
> Create 243 acres ofoak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination ofblue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees in the following SPA locations:

34.3-5
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-21
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
accordance with this
condition.

The Conservation
Easements within the
Phase 3 portion ofthe
subdivision were fenced
offaround their
boundaries in advance of
the commencement of
grading and construction
and the City verified
compliance by
inspecting the fence in
advance of grading.
. Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat.
' Preserve and passive open space zones throughout the
SPA.
. Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak
woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e' catch slopes).
' Other practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space.
. Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodland mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
> A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defned below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination of acorns, seedlings,
and various sizes ofcontainer trees (#1 container, #5
container, #15 container) or transplanted trees shall be incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) shall have a minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
. One established acorn equals one unit (acorns will be over planted to maximize potential germination).
. One oak seedling equals one unit.
. One #1 container oak tree equals two units.
. One #5 container oak tree equals three units.
' One #15 container oak tree equals four units.
. One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units,
. One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh).
. Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to
overall habitat values. Each non oak tree
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
shall represent unit values described above for oak trees, but non oak species shall comprise no more than l0% of
the mitigation plantings.
> Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland
habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento and El Dorado Counties may be secured and
placed under conservation easement in lieu of onsite
mitigation measures if necessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity. > Create oak woodlands off site. Plant a combination of blue oak acoms, seedlings, and trees at off-site location(s), if needed to achieve the creation goal of 243 acres of new blue oak woodland habitat, This measure would only be
needed if 243 acres of blue oak woodland could not be
created in the SPA. Off-site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation, Off-site tree planting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally support
blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed
through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to project development. Planted areas
shall be placed under conservation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity,
> The oak woodland mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant($ shall include a maintenance and monitoring
program for any replacement trees. The program shall
include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria. Replacement oak trees shall be
maintained and monitored for a minimum of eight years
from the date ofplanting and irrigation shall be provided to planted trees for the first five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80%
survival rate for planted trees by the end of the eight-year Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
maintenance and monitoring period. Dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80%
survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning
Department, The security will be forfeited if the project applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and monitoring and meet the success criteria.

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation
The project applicant(s) of all on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated trees and the off-site Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S. 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; and the underground sewer force main shall develop a map depicting the tree canopy of all oak trees in the survey area and identifying the acreage ofhee canopy that would be preserved and the acreage that would be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak trees (those not located within the delineated boundary of oak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director, As a condition of the tree removal permit, project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement.

The City's Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project applicants have developed a plan, as set forth Section 10 ofthe Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (attached to this EIRIEIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide
compensatory mitigation for removal of protected trees in the SPA. In addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the following elements shall be included in a protected tree mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and agreed upon by the City:
> Project applicant($ ofprojects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered
professional forester to perform a determinate survey of tree species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas ofthe ect site for tree removal and
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
encroachment of development. The condition of individual trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
. 5 = Excellent; No problems - tree has no structural
problems, branches are properly spaced and tree
characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.
. 4 = Good; No apparent problems - tree is in good
condition and no apparent problems from visual
inspection. Ifpotential structural or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and
more serious health problems can be averted.
. 3 = Fair; Minor problems - There are some minor
structural or health problems that pose no immediate
danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist
report are completed correctly the defect(s) can be
minimized or eliminated.
' 2 = Poor; Major problems - the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with correct
arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe
removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. If the
recommended actions are completed correctly, hazardcan
be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. Ifno
action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed.
. 1 = Hazardous or non correctable condition -the tree is in extremely poor condition and in non-reversible decline.

This rating is assigned to a tree that has structural and/or health problems that no amount of tree care work or effort can change. The issues may or may not be considered a
dangerous situation. The tree may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an unacceptable risk of spreading the disease or pests(s) to other trees.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
. 0 = Dead - the tree has no significant signs of life (dead or very close to being dead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criteria
> The determination for whether an isolated tree shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed
with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the
condition and size of the tree as follows:
. Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation. . Trees rated2 may be removed at 50% of the normal
Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.
. Trees rated 3, 4, and/or 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation,
. Native isolated oaks measuring 24 inches or greater dbh for a single trunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rateda3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wa11($ higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the
tree(s) from mass grading ofthe SPA properties,
. Native oaks measuring between 12 and24 inches dbh and rated a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the
tree(s) from mass grading ofthe SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation
planting criteria described here) would result.
. Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 12 inches dbh shall not be removed unless
unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak hee mitigation
planting criteria described here) would result.
. Native oak trees measuring 1 inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated,
included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated a3,4,or a 5, Credits shall only be accepted if the tree protection znne (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge of the tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater trees are
protected on a conshuction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List. STPC shall not count if they the tree is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected tree to be preserved. The City shall
accept the preservation ofnative oak trees in this size class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC criteria:

Folsom Municipal Code requires one of the following be
planted as compensation for each diameter inch of
protected tree removed:
' half of a 24-ir. h box tree;
. one #15 container tree;
. two #5 container trees; or
. $150 in-lieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution.

The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a
planting plan, planting and irrigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The plan shall include a 5-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acoms with an annual monitoring report that includes corrections needed with proposed work plan, and notice of compliance within 90-days of annual
monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The securi8 will be forfeited if the project Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
applicant or designated responsible party fails to fulfill the Planting and Maintenance Agreement.
> To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected trees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all
affected project phases shall install high visibility fencing outside the outer edge of the drip lines of all trees to be retained on the SPA during project construction. The
fencing may be installed around groups or stands oftrees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines ofall hees are protected. Grading, trenching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, irrigation, and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines ofprotected trees). Ifthe activities listed cannot be avoided within the drip line of a particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and
compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the hee in question shall be monitored for a period of five years and replaced only if the tree appears to be dead or dying within five years of project implementation.

Through a combination of the mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation of blue oak woodland habitat in the open space areas, the project
applicant(s) can satisfu the mitigation requirements for removal of trees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined through consultation with the Sacramento County Planning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the U,S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant($ of each applicable project phase with Caltrans.

Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for
Construction Employees.

Prior to beginning construction activities, the Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees. ws-1
(Addendum
)
7t-22
Resolution No. 10780
Page77 ofl58

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
rvith this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
ofFish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
within suitable tadpole
habitat.

The training shall describe the importance of onsite biological resources, including special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests ofspecial-status birds; and roosting habitat for special- status bats. The biologist shall also explain the importance of other responsibilities related to the protection of wildlife during construction such as inspecting open trenches and looking under vehicles and machinery prior to moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to briefthem on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation
requirements. Ifnew construction personnel are added to the project, the contractor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before starting work.

An environmental awareness handout that describes and
illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.

Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vernal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for westem spadefoot. If no western spadefoot individuals are found during the
preconshuction survey, the biologist shall documentthe
findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If western spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.
ws-2
(Addendum
)
7l-23
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
Yes
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

On June 10,2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verifted compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
rvas verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
ofFish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
California
Department
ofFish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

During all construction
phases
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
within suitable
northwestern pond
turtle habitat.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey.

The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within l4 days prior to commencement of construction during the nesting season (l February through 31 August).

If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent of the nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist. Once the young are independent ofthe nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside ofthe nesting season.

Comply with the Programmatic Agreement
The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identifuing historic nronerties. determinins adverse effects. and resolving those Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle
Survey.

The Project Applicant($ shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable habitat for northwestern pond turtle. If no northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be
required. Ifnorthwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity of the project.

NB-1
(Addendum
)
3A$1a
(Addendum)
NWPT-1
(Addendum
)
7t-25
71-26
7t-24
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction, All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department.

On June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department.

Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.
adverse effects as required under Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural
Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform
Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be
Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables and
management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly
reference the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each
individual development phase or off-site element, the
applicable oversight agency (City of Folsom, El Dorado
County, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
> The project applicant shall retain the services ofa qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site
element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified
resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The 3AS1b
(Addendum)
7t-27
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
inventory report shall also identif locations that are
sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location ofknown resources, geomorphology, and
topography. The inventory report shall specifr the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identihed resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate.
> The identification ofany sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction of each individual
development phase shall be performed in concert with
monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.
> For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the services ofa qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of "significant" (under CEQA) cultural
resources. These findings shall be reviewed by the
applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and treatment measures provided in this
EIR/EIS.
> Where possible, the project shall be configured or
redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources.

Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place if possible, as suggested under California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance of historic properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public
Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800.
> Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measures that are determined to be necessary by Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesOn June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.
a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist of data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because of the data they contain (which may
contribute to research). Alternatively, for historical
architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive,
narrative, or photographic documentation, These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIRJEIS.
> To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall prepare an appropriate
prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate treatment.
> These steps and documents may be combined with the
phasing ofmanagement and documents prepared pursuant
to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom'sjurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant($ of each applicable project phase ivith the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-
Site Monitoring If Required, Sfop Work if Cultural
Resources are Discovered, fusess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.

To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall do the following:
> Before the start ofground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) ofall proiect phases shall retain a qualified 3A,;$2
(Addendum)
7l-28
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department. Compliance
with this condition is
monitored through
construction inspection.
archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity ofthe project APE, to educate them about the possibility ofencountering
buried cultural resources and inform them ofthe proper
procedures should cultural resources be encountered,
> As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A'.5-1a and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion of the SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown
cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with
respect to monitoring.
> Should any culfural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts ofbone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any consfuction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity of the find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identifi ed below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight
agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologistwho shall conduct a field investigation ofthe specific site and shall assess the significance ofthe find by evaluating the
resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. If the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or
destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 34.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval ofrecommended
mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved
mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the proiect applicant(s) of each applicable proiect with the Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitivity training program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for
construction supervisors. The sensitivity training program shall provide information about notification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for
coordination between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and information about other treatment or issues that may arise if culturalresources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocol shall be communicated to all new construction personnel during
orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible location inside the construction job trailer. The phone number of the USACE culturalresources staff member shall also be included.

The on-site sensitivity training shall be canied out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning ofeach construction season by each contractor.

If unanticipated discoveries of additional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 0), are made during the construction of the project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
> The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in thatarca is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius ofthe unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional
qualifications standards specified in Section 2,2 of
Attachment G of the HPMP. The Construction Manager, or
archaeological monitor, if present, shall notif'the USACE wiIhin24 hours of the discovery.
> The USACE shall notifr the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an
unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance with this HPTP. Once the USACE
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThere have been no
human remains
discovered during the
course ofgrading and
construction in the
project.

Sacramento
County
Coroner;
Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
During all ground
disturbing activities,
for any project phase,
makes a formal determination of eligibility for the
resource, the USACE will notify the SHPO within 48
hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an
opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The
SHPO shall respond withinT2 hours of the request to
consult. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the
treatment measures.

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed faining roster and copy of training materials.

Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if lluman Remains are Encountered and Complywith California Health and Safety Code Procedures.

In accordance with the Califomia Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing
activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applicant($ of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area ofthe find and notiff the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional
archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature of the remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice ofa discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5[b]). Ifthe coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the NAHC by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner's findings are complete, the project
applicant(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC-designated Most Likely Descendant shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition ofthe remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for acting on notification ofa discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code.
3At3
(Addendum)
7t-29
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Upon the discovery of Native American remains, the
procedures above regarding involvement ofthe applicable county coroner, notification of the NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be followed. The project applicant($ ofall project phases shall ensure that the
immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make
recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and
analysis, preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatment. As suggested by AB 2641(Chapter 863, Statutes of 2006), the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains, AB 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant($ shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
> record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate
Information Center,
> use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or
> record a reinternment document with the county.

The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative ofall project phases shall rebury the Native American human
remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the properlry in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identiff an Most Likely Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation bv the NAHC fails to provide
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe owner/applicant has
provided Geotechnical
Report to the City. The
Geotechnical report for
the subdivision is on file
with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
ground-disturbing
activities.
measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials.

Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC
Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations
Before building permits are issued and construction activities begin any project development phase, the project applicant($ of each project phase shall hire a licensed geotechnical engineer to prepare a final geotechnical subsurface
investigation report for the on- and off-site facilities, which shall be submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified below). The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make
recommendations on the following:
> site preparation;
> soil bearing capacity;
> appropriate sources and types offill;
> potential need for soil amendments;
> road, pavement, and parking areas;
> structuralfoundations, includingretaining-wall design; > grading practices;
> soil corrosion ofconcrete and steel;
> erosion/winterization;
> seismic ground shaking;
> liquefaction; and
3A.7-1a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-30
Geology and Soils
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
Compliance rvith this
condition has been
monitored through
construction inspection
by the City.

Compliance with this
condition has been
monitored through
construction inspection
by the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
ground-disturbing
activities.

Before the start of
construction activities.
> expansive/unstablesoils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions, and shall determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the version of the CBC that is applicable at the time building and grading permits are applied for. A11 recommendations
contained in the final geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented by the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase' Special recommendations contained in the geotechnical
engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before construction begins. Design and construction of all new project development shall be in accordance with the CBC. The project applicant(s) shall provide for engineering inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with
recommendations contained in the geotechnical report.

Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All
earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant($ ofeach project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement offill, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on both on- and off- site construction areas.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and
Erosion Control Plan. Before grading permits are issued, the project applicant(s) of each project phase that would be located within the City of Folsom shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan.

The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department before issuance of grading oermits for all new development. The plan shall be consistent

34.7-1b
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.7-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-31
7t-32
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
with the City's Grading Ordinance, the City's Hillside
Development Guidelines, and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant($ ofthat phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan.

The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills. The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES
permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west of Prairie City Road, the project applicant($ ofthat phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan, The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before issuance ofa grading permit. The plan shall be
consistent rvith Sacramento County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location,
implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description of measures designed to control dust and stabilize the
construction-site road and entrance, and a description ofthe location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering ofstockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion. Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction of retaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabilization of construction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and all
improvement plans in
the subdivision to veriff
compliance with
mitigation measure.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2020.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
earthmoving activities
During earthmoving
activities in the Ione
and Mehrten
Formations.
installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source oftransportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by ttre project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-1 (discussed in Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land") would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.

Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building
Foundations. The project applicant($ ofall project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist of perforated pipe and gravel, sunounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months arvay from building foundations.

Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if
Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the
Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a
Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknorvn potentially unique, scientifically important paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
> Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the Ione or Mehrten Formations, the
project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to train all construction personnel
involved with earthmoving activities, including the site the of
3A.7-5
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.7-10
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7l-33
7t-34
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
rvas verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
small-lot final maps
and building permits
for all discretionary
development project,
including all on- and
off-site elements and
implementation
throughout project
construction.

Implement Additional Measures to Control Construction-
Generated GHG Emissions.

To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant($ any particular discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures for reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are
recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use of on-site equipment, worker commute hips, and truck trips canying materials and
equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for construction
fossils, the appearance and types offossils likely to be seen during construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered.
> Ifpaleontological resources are discovered during
earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall
immediately cease work in the vicinity of the find and
notif the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant($ shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and datarecovery procedures, museum storage
coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of frndings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant($ of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County). 3A.4-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change
71-35
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.
concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary
development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most cunent list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract with the selected primary contractor. The project applicant($ for any particular
discretionary development application may submit to the City and SMAQMD a report that substantiates lvhy specific
measures are considered infeasible for construction of that particular development phase and/or at that point in time. The report, including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by the City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction of each development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection of a primary contractor, this measure requires that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD's recommended measures for reducing
construction-related GHG emissions at the time of writing this EIR/EIS are listed below and the project applicant($ shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
> Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
. reduce unnecessary idling (modify work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort);
r perform equipment maintenance (inspections, detect
failures early, conections);
. train equipment operators in proper use of equipment; . use the proper size ofequipment for thejob; and
r use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains).

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> Use alternative fuels for electricity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use
electrical power.
> Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen [NOx] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.)
Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB
2009b).
> Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction
worker commutes.
> Reduce electricity use in the construction office by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more
efficient ones.
> Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and
demolition debris (goal of at least 75%by weight).
> Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials (goal of at 1east20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and curb materials).
> Minimize the amount of concrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option.
> Produce concrete on-site if determined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.
> Use EPA-certifred SmartWay trucks for deliveries and
equipment transport. Additional information about the
SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is available
from ARB's Hear,y-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas
Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe orvner/applicant
worked with an
organization Urban
Wood Rescue r,vhich is a
program in association
rvith the Sacramento
Tree Foundation that
makes wood products
from large trees that are
removed as a result of
development. The
owner/applicant
provided most of the
large trees that were
removed as a part of the
grading and construction
for the project to Urban
Wood Rescue and they
made table, furniture,
etc. from the trees that
were provided. The
remaining trees and tree
canopy was mulched by
the owner/applicant and
is stored on site to use as
mulch in the landscape
areas throughout the
project. No removed
trees were transported to
the landfill in accordance
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
final maps and/or
building permits for all
project phases
requiring discretionary
approval, including all
on- and off-site
elements.
> Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to
effrciently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist ofthe use ofnonpotable water from a local source.

In addition to SMAQMD+ecommended measures, construction activity shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.

Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community
Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The trees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary funding for urban and community forestry program (such as
the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest
Ecosystems lnstitute fUrban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensure that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that ofall harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., furniture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and fund an off-site tree program that includes a level of tree plantingthal,ala minimum, increases carbon
sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime.

This program shall be funded by the project applicant(s) of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an
independent Certified Arborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements of Mitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3,
"Biological Resources - Land." Final approval ofthe program shall be provided by the City. Components of the program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the Cif of Folsom would simultaneously mitisate the loss of oak
3L.4-2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-36
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe subdivision is not
within any identified
area where contaminated
groundwater is present.

Therefore there is no
required Phase I or
Phase 2 Environmental
Assessment required.
with this condition of
approval.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
earth moving activities
Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which
Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in
Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental
Site Assessments and Implement Required Measures. The
project applicant($ for any discretionary development
application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing for all areas ofthe SPA and include, as necessary, analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potential contamination sites that have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 34.8-1) before construction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant($ shall implement the following
measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substances:
> Prepare aplanthat identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off-site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution of clean fil| material in the SPA, and closure ofany abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall
include measures that ensure the safe and
woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The Califomia Urban Foreshy Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008), All unused vegetation and tree material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative material should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant.
3A.8-2
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-37
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
disposal of contaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the
contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and treat the contaminated groundwater to remove contaminants
before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The
project applicant($ shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal of
hazardous materials removed from the site at an
appropriate off-site disposal facilify,
> NotiS the appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies if evidence ofpreviously undiscovered soil or groundwater
contamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction activities. Any
contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County
Environmental Management Department, Central Valley
RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state,
or local regulatory agencies,
> Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD
pertaining to the contents of any existing pole-mounted transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall
determine whether existing on-site electrical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is
identified, the maintenance and/or disposal ofthe
transformer shall be subject to the regulations of the Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority ofthe
Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
There are no overhead
powerlines existing
within this subdivision
and all proposed and
future utility lines to
serve this subdivision
will be placed
underground in
accordance with the
subdivision' s conditions
of approval.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
rvith this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
At the submission of
tentative map
applications.

Before issuance of
grading permits for the
proj ect water features.

Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure.

Potential purchasers of residential properties near the transmission lines shall be made aware of the controversy surrounding EMF exposure. The California Department of Real Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant's final Subdivision Public Report application, which shall be provided to purchasers of properties within 100 feet from the 100-115kV power line , or within 150 feet from the220-230 kV power line . The notification rvould include a discussion ofthe scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where background levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

Prepare and Inplement a Vector Control Plan in
Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and
Vector Control District. To ensure that operation and design of the stormwater system, including multiple planned detention basins, is consistent with the recommendations of the
Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District
regarding mosquito control, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Vector Control Plan. This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the Cif for approval before issuance of the grading permit for the detention basins under the City'sjurisdiction. For the off-site detention basin, the plan shall be submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008). The plan shall include-, but is not limited to, the following components:
> Description of the project.
3A.8-6
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)

34.8-7
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
71-38
7t-39
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> Description ofdetention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
> Goals of the plan.
> Description of the water management elements and
features that would be implemented, including:
. BMPs that would implemented on-site;
. public education and awareness;
r sanitary methods used (e.g,, disposal of garbage);
. mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
. stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater
Management Plan).
> Long-term maintenance ofthe detention basins and all
related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable
conditions or maintenance by a homeou'ner's association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant($ shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identifr and implement BMPs based on their potential
effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as
practicable to discourage dense plant growth;
> perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant
densities to facilitate the ability of mosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move throughout vegetated area;
> design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water.

The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment befween maintenance periods. Compaction
during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling;
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP's, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Construction General
PermitNOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development and
submittal of any other
locally required plans
and specifications
before the issuance of
grading permits for all
on-site project phases
and off-site elements
and implementation
throughout project
construction,
ofthe StateAcquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the issuance of
grading permits, the project applicant($ ofall projects disturbing one or more acres (including phased construction of smaller areas which are part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage under the SWRCB's NPDES stormwater permit for
general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ),
including preparation and submittal ofa project-specific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) shall also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City of Folsom, El Dorado County (for the off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Alternative). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identiff and specify:
> the use ofan effective combination ofrobust erosion and sediment control BMPs and construction techniques
for use in thethe local
> coordinate cleaning ofcatch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operations;
> enforce the prompt removal of silt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water
quality;
> if the sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception of the inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area of water for mosquito egg-laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipe$; and
> design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy
dewatering of the unit if necessary (Sacramento Yolo
Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant($ ofthe project phase containing the off- site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County). 3A-9-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
Hydrolory and Water Quality
7t-40
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
sRwQCB.
area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoffand the release, mobilization, and
exposure ofpollutants, including legacy sources of
mercury from project-related construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion
control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation
ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences
> the implementation of approved local plans, non-
stormwater management controls, permanent post-
construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance
responsibilities;
> the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and
nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other types of materials used for equipment operation;
> spill prevention and contingency measures, including
measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous r,vaste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
> personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit
requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs
specified in *re SWPPP; and
> the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP.
> Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shallbe in place throughout all site work and
construction/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as those listed below. > Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control
measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of
sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe Owner/applicant has
received aNPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
grading plans and
building permits of all
project phases.
construction. These measures may include silt fences,
staked straw bales or wattles, sedimenVsilt basins and
traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation' > Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoff
velocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and transpiration.
> Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoff by conveying surface runoff down
sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoffto a
watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and
facil ity infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be maintained and
available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Caltrans shall coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project
SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement
Requirements Contained in Those Plans.

Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off- site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills. demonstrating that off-site upstream runoff would be appropriately conveyed through the SPA, and that proiect-related on-site runoff would 34r.9-2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
7l-41
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

BMP's, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
sRwQCB.
be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfication impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
> an accurate calculation ofpre-project and post-project runoff scenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
> runoffcalculations for the l0-year and 100-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as
required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage
pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and
detention facility locations finalized in the design phase; > a description ofthe proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage systeml
> project-specific standards for installing drainage systems; r City and El Dorado County flood control design
requirements and measures designed to comply rryith them; Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range of conditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain current stream geomorphology. These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoff at the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious
surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept
stormwater);
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
City of
Folsom
Community
Prepare plans before
the issuance of grading
permits for all project
> enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics;
> bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bank
erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for
enhancement of riparian habitat and maintenance of natural hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions;
> minimize slope differences between any stormwater or
detention facility outfall channel with the existing
receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and > minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel
and floodplain corridor, and utilize open bottom box
culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage
courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado County Department of
Transportation that 100-year (0.01 AEP) flood flows would be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures within or down gradient of the SPA would not occur, and that hydromodification would not be increased from pre-development levels such that existing stream geomorphology would be changed (the range of
conditions should be calculated for each receiving water if feasible, or a conservative estimate should be used, e.g., an Ep of 1 +10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works
Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County.

Develop and Implement a BMP and Water Quality
Maintenance Plan. Before approval of the grading permits for any development project requiring a subdivision map, a
3A.9-3
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-42
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP's, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and

SRWQCB,
The owner/applicant has
prepared storm drain
design reports and
provided storm drain
calculations for all ofthe
proposed storm drainage
features and
detentiodwater quality
and hydromodification
basins necessary to serve
this subdivision. These
reports have been
reviewed and approved
by the Community
Development and Public
Works Departments.

Development
Department
and Public
Works
Department
phases and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout project
construction.
detailed BMP and water quality maintenance plan shall be prepared by a qualified engineer retained by the project applicant(s) the development project. Drafts of the plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom and El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, for review and approval concurrently with development of tentative subdivision maps for all project phases. The plan shall finalize the water quality improvements and further detail the structural and nonstructural BMPs proposed for the project. The plan shall include the elements described below.
> A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis of proposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage design features.
> Predevelopment and post development calculations
demonstrating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the "'stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and
South Placer Regions" ([SSQP 2007b] per NPDES Permit
No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0l42,page 46)
and El Dorado County's NPDES SWMP (County of El
Dorado 2004).
> Source control programs to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to
recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization,
prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management of public trash collection areas.
> A pond management component for the proposed basins
that shall include management and maintenance
requirements for the design features and BMPs, and
responsible parties for maintenance and funding.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThere are no existing or
proposed dams upstream
from this subdivision
and therefore there is no
requirement to perform
the analysis required in
this condition of
approval.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Prior to submittal to
the City of tentative
maps or improvement
plans.
> LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but
are not limited to:
. surface swales;
r replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement);
. impervious surfaces disconnection; and
. hees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be placed along the natural drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage patterns. The reduction in runoff as a result ofthe LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoff reduction credit system methodology described in "stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4" (SSQP
2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoff volumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans.

Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream
of the Project Site and Make Improvements if Necessary.

Prior to submittal to the City of tentative maps or improvement plans the project applicant($ of all project phases shall perform conduct studies to determine the extent of inundation in the case ofdam failure. Ifthe studies determine potential exposure of people or structures to a significant risk of flooding as a result of the failure of a dam, the applicants(s) shall implement

34.9-4
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-43
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe owner/applicant has
implemented noise
reducing construction
practices included as part
of the required Noise
Control Plan.

Compliance with these
requirements has been
monitored through
construction inspection.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
construction activities
on the SPA and within
El Dorado Hills.

Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and
Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors. To
reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant($ and their primary contractors for engineering design and construction of all project phases shall ensure that the follorving requirements are implemented at each work site in any year of project construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing
construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
> Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and befiveen 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays.
> All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-
sensitive land uses.
> A1l construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction intake and exhaust
mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with
manufacturers' recommendations. Equipment engine
shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.
> All motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling.
> Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead of riveting, mixing concrete offsite instead of on-site).
of any feasible recommendations provided in that study, potentially through drainage improvements, subject to the approval of the City of Folsom Public Works Department. 3A.11-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
Noise and Vibration
7t-44
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and
generators) as planned phases are built out and future noise sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to future construction activities.

Written notification of construction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet of construction activities. Notifi cation shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction
activities are anticipated to occur and contact information, including a daytime telephone number, for the project
representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-
sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification.

To the extent feasible, acoustic baniers (e.g., lead curtains, sound baniers) shall be constructed to reduce construction- generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses.

The baniers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site
construction equipment. When installed properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by
approximately 8-10 dB (EPA 1971).

When future noise sensitive uses are within close
proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise-
attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be located between noise sources and future residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise.

The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a
construction noise management plan. This plan shall
identify specific measures to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above. The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
Blasting has been
necessary throughout the
course of grading and
construction in this
subdivision. The blasting
has not been within 2000
feet of any sensitive
receptor. The blasting
contractor has obtained a
blasting permit from the
City and the Community
Development
Department has verified
compliance with the
permit through
construction inspection.

The owner/applicant has
implemented noise
reducing construction
practices included as part
of the required Noise
Control Plan.

Compliance with these
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
bulldozing and
blasting activities on
the SPA and within El
Dorado Hills and the
County of Sacramento
Before submittal of
improvement plans for
each project phase,
and during project
operations for testing
of emergency
generators.
noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the construction noise
management plan is approved by the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project
applicant(s) of the applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside ofthe
City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries.

Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive
Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
> To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted wilhin275 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
> To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
> All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of
California.
> A blasting plan, including estimates of vibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement of the first blast.
> Each blast shall be monitored and documented for
groundbourne noise and vibration levels at the nearest
sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-
Generated Stationary Sources.

The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following measures to reduce the effect of noise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:

34.11-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.11-5
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-45
7t-46
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
requirements has been
monitored through
construction inspection.

There are no sensitive
receptors within 600 feet
of any on-going
construction and grading
activity in the
subdivision.
> Routine testing and preventive maintenance of emergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). A11 electrical generators shall be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers' specifications.
> External mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate features designed to reduce noise
emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating
generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that
incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment
enclosures shall be oriented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby
noise-sensitive receptors.
> Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [0 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of parking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.
> Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m,] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of loading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as possible from noise sensitive land uses, constructing noise barriers between loading docks and noise-sensitive land Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a C of O
in the appropriate
phase of
development of the
project.

The landscape and
streetscape plans for the
subdivision include the
required masonry walls
in the required height
and required locations.

The Community
Development
Department will monitor
compliance during
construction and veriff
that the sound walls are
complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy in the
subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to building
occupancy
uses, or using buildings and topographic features to
provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise baniers, as detailed below, to reduce traffic noise levels below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of 60 dB Ldn.
> 6-foot tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all properly
boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini
Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway.
> For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion ofthe project, a 7-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.
> For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase I and
Phase 2 portions ofthe project, an 8-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be
constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to
White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise baniers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall barrier height may be achieved by utilizing a barrier and earthen berm combination.

Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use.

Barrier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of 117 -122 feet from the ultimate alignment of White Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White Rock Road improvements are funded and moving
forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services ofa noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual property boundary

4.13-1
(Addendum
)
7l-47
Resolution No. 10780
Page I 10 of 158

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a C of O
in the appropriate
phase of
development of the
project.

Public Services
Yes
The Community
Development
Department will monitor
compliance during
construction and verifu
that the sound r,valls are
complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy in the
subdivision.

The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and
approved all traffic
control plans required
for the construction of
both off-site and on-
site improvements for
this subdivision to
veriff compliance
with City ordinances
and to minimize
delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site
elements outside the City
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Prior to building
occupancy
Before the approval of
all relevant plans
andior permits and
during construction of
all project phases.
setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measures to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City of Folsom noise standards.

Interior Traffic Noise Reducfion Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been
implemented.
> For the first-row of homes located along White Rock
Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor
building facades shall maintain minimum window
assembly STC ratings of 34.
> Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the
occupants to close doors and windows as desired to
achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control
PIan. The project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic control plans must follow any applicable standards ofthe agency responsible for the affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising ofplanned lane closures, warning signage, a flag person to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by
emergency vehicles. During project construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval ofall project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

4.13-2
(Addendum
)

34.14-1
(FPASP
ErRlErS)
7t-48
7t-49
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
limits for this
subdivision.

The City Fire
Department has
reviewed and approved
all proposed
improvements for the
subdivision, The City FD
will veriff adequate fire
flow prior to building
permit issuance in the
subdivision.

City of
Folsom Fire
Department,
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
issuance of occupancy
permits or final
inspections for all
project phases.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties and Caltrans).

Incorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fire
Code Requirementsl and EDHFD Requirements, if
Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and
Approval. To reduce impacts related to the provision of new fire services, the project applicant($ ofa1l project phases shall do the following, as described below.

1. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic
sprinkler systems, the availability of adequate fire flow, and the locations of hydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section 1 7.57.080 ("Vehicular Access Requirements"), These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and barricades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers
Standard, as required by the City ofFolsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and
Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for
review and approval before the issuance ofbuilding permits, In addition to the above measures, the project applicant(s) ofall ect shall the described below
3L.14-2
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
71-50
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

The City Fire
Department has
reviewed and approved
all proposed
improvements for the
subdivision. The City FD
will veriff adequate fire
flow prior to building
City of
Folsom Fire
Department,
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
issuance ofoccupancy
permits or final
inspections for all
project phases.
for the portion of the SPA within the EDHFD service area,if it is determined through City,El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 178-acre portion of the SPA.

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements based on the EDHFD fire prevention standards, For
commercial development, improvement plans showing
roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval. For residential development, improvement plans showing property lines and adjacent streets or roads; total acreage or square footage ofthe parcel; the footprint ofall structures; driveway plan views describing width, length, turnouts, tumarounds, radiuses, and surfaces; and driveway profile views showing the percent grade from the access road to the structure and vertical clearance shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance ofbuilding permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklers shall submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a California State Licensed C-l6 Contractor.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy ofany structures until the project applicant($ have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Department verif ing that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction ofthe City ofFolsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre area of the SPA within the EDHFD service area.

Incorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs.

The project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, and/or EDHFD for those areas of the SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verify to City of Folsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
3A.14-3
(FPASP
ErR/DrS)
7t-51
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Traflic and Transportation
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
permit issuance in the
subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision ivill pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented and
when fair share
funding should be
paid.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented and
when fair share
funding should be
paid.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance ofoccupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Folsom
Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 1).

To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road
intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection
(Intersection l).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements at the Sibley Street/Blue
Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (lntersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Lnprovements to
the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersection
(Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, atrafftc signal must be installed.
3A.15-1a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3d15-1c
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-52
7t-53
7t-54
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the llillside
Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection
(Intersection 41). To ensure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane and two through lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of fi.vo through lanes and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue
Parkway/IVliddle Road Intersection
(Intersection 44). To ensure that the Oak Avenue
Parkway/Middle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.
3A.15-1e
(TPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-1f
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
71-55
7l-56
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
and Caltrans
Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

Before project build
out. Design of the
White Rock Road
widening to four lanes,
from Grant Line Road
to Prairie City Road,
with Intersection
improvements has
begun, and because
this widening project
is environmentally
cleared and fully
funded, it's
construction is
expected to be
complete before the
first phase of the
Proposed Project or
alternative is built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard
Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2). To ensure that the Hazel Avenueffolsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including'Jug handle" ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. 50/Hazel Avenue interchange is a mitigation measure for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel
Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road
Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road
(Sacramento County Intersection 3). Improvements must be made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The currently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will
widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line). This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road to be the tkough movement. The improvements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound right turn lanes, fwo westbound left turn lanes and two westbound through lanes. This improvement also includes the signalization of the White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With
implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency 3A.15-1h
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A-15-1i
(FPASP
ErRrErs)
7t-57
71-58
Resolution No. 10780
Page I l6 of 158

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastrucfure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision r,vill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
r,vith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
ElDorado
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Before project build
out. Construction of
phase two of the Hazel
Avenue widening,
from Madison Avenue
to Cunagh Downs
Drive, is expected to
be completed by year
2013, before the first
phase of the Proposed
Project or alternative is
complete. The
applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of
funding of
improvements to the
agency responsible for
improvements, based
on a program
established by that
agency to reduce the
impacts toHazel
Avenue between
Madison Avenue and
Curragh Downs Drive
(Sacramento County
Roadway Segment
1 0).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line
Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County
Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue
and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10). To
ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS
befiveen Curragh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part of the County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way
Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized and separate northbound left and right turn lanes must be striped. 3A1s-lj
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1t
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-59
7t-60
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastrucfure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n and the City
ofRancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Works
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound
Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an alternate parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel route. It is preferred to alleviate the congestion on U.S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end ofthis reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom BoulevardAJ.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east of Folsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16
Intersection (Caltrans Intersection l2). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared througtr/right-turn lane. Protected left-turn signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, and are scheduled for Measure A funding.
3A.15-1o
(FPASP
ErRlErS)
3A.15-1p
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-61
7t-62
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
Caltrans
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Before project build
out, Construction of
the Sacramento 50
Bus-Carpool Lane and
Community
Enhancements Project
is expected to be
completed by year
2013, before the first
phase ofthe Proposed
Project or alternative is
complete.

Construction of the
Sacramento 50 Bus-
Carpool Lane and
Community
Enhancements Project
has started since the
writing of the Draft
EIS/EIR.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route l6 intersection (Caltrans Intersection l2).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel
Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lane must be constructed. This improvement is
currently planned as part ofthe Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and Community Enhancements Project. The applicant
shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard
(Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel
Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S, 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program,
3d15-1q
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-1r
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-63
7t-64
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and
Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceplable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed, This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City R.oad (Freeway Segment 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie
City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard, an
auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment l6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel
Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). To
ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS 3A.15-1s
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1u
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-lv
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-65
7t-66
7t-67
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Specific Plan
Infrastrucfure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
of Public
Works and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be bui1t.
between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parlavay interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard
Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4). To ensure that Eastbound
U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed, This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations
Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom
Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off- ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed. This improvement was
recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane
improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus studv or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by 3A.15-lw
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1x
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-68
7t-69
Resolution No. 10780
Page l2l ofl58

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
lvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), Citv Traffic
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine durins
applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5) Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound/Trairie City Road
Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Eastbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6), Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp
Weave (Freeway Weave 8). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an
improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an
improvement may involve a "braided ramp".

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave
(Freeway Weave 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9). To ensure that
Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50

3.d15-1y
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
3A.15-12
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1aa
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-70
7l-71
7t-72
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50
Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50
operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would
merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). To ensure
that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29).
3A.15-1dd
(FPASP
ErR/DIS)
3A.15-1ee
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-73
7t-74
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out, A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road
Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32). To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shallpay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway
Merge 32).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road
Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33). To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shallpay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway
Merge 33).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce knpacts on U.S.50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard
Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by

34.15-1ff
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1gg
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1hh
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-75
7t-76
7t-77
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Works
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before approval of
improvement plans for
all project phases any
particular discretionary
development
application that
includes residential
and commercial or
mixed-use
development. As a
condition ofproject
approval and/or as a
condition of the
development
agreement for all
project phases.
applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 WestboundffiazelAvenue
Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS aLtheHazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use
Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and
Develop and Provide Options for Altemative Transportation Modes. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop
commercial and mixed-use development concurrent with
housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to internalize vehicle trips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To further minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and .secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume of single-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent of travel by transit. The project's fair-share participation and the associated timing of the imorovements and service shall be identified in the proiect

34.15-1ii
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3415-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-78
7t-79
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit,
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Concurrent with
construction for all
project phases.

Concurrent with
construction for all
project phases.

As a condition of
project approval
and/or as a condition
of the development
agreement for all
project phases.
conditions ofapproval and/or the project's development
agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT.

Participate in the City's Transportation System
Management Fee Program. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the City's existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of
single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and
intersections.

Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation
Management Association. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall join and participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association to reduce the number of single-occupant
automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Pay Full Cost of Identified Improvements that Are Not
Funded by the City's Fee Program. In accordance with
Measure W, the project applicant($ for any particular
discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because of the Specific Plan.
3A.15-2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-80
71-81
7t-82
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specifrc Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Sibley Street/Blue
Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Streeitslue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D rvith less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left- turn lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Oak Avenue
Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom
Intersection 6). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist ofhvo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right- turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and a right-turn lane, It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell
Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street
intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one 3A.15-4a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4b
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-83
7t-84
71-85
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
left{urn lane, one left-through lane, and two dedicated right- turn lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidrvell
Street/Nesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell
Street/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 21). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /lron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of tuio left-turn lanes. four through lanes and a rightturn lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron
Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23). To
improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist ofone left-turn lane, one shared leftthrough lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/lron Point Road
Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch
Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection
24).To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road 3415-4d
(FPASP
ErRrErs)
3A.15-4e
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4f
(FPASP
ErRrErs)
71-86
7t-87
71-88
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all of the following improvements are required: The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The westbound approach must be
reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, one through lane, and a through-right lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval of the first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to
the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway
Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be
reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road
Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection
operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type ofgrade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified 3A.15-4g
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4i
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-89
7t-90
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit,
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
in the Sacramento County's Proposed General Plan.

Implementation of these improvements r,vould assist in
reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock
Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway
Segments 5-7). To improve operation on Grant Line Road
between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP.

Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and
Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento Counfy Roadway Segments 5- 7). The identified improvement lvould more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer
Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County
Roadway Segment 8). To improve operation on Grant Line
Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highrvay, this
roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This
improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be
implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho 3A1s-4j
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-4k
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-gt
71-92
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
lvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County
Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs
Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County
Roadway Segments 12-13). To improve operation onHazel
Avenue befiveen Curragh Downs Drive and the U.S, 50
westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento County's general plan because the county's policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes. Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.15- 4q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and,
therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line
Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway
Segment 22).To improve operation on White Rock Road
between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the
Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this
roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County.

The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 proiect on 3A.15-4t
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-4m
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-93
7t-94
Resolution No. 10780
Page l3l of158

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
lvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
this roadway segment. However, because of other development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road
(Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).

Participate in Fair Share F'unding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire
Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento
County Roadway Segment 28). To improve operation on
White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson
Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be
implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28),
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing
Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County l).
3A.15-4n
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4o
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-95
7t-96
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infiastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n,
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which proiect phase
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the llazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound
Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1). To ensure that the Hazel AvenueAJ,S. 50 westbound ramps intersection
operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane, one shared left through lane and three dedicated right-turn lanes.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenuefu.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1)' Participate in Fair Share Funding of hnprovements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel
Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfatdel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho
Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an
additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This
improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plq4; 3A.15-4p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4q
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
3A.15-4r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
7t-97
71-98
7t-99
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transpoftation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrashucture Fees
(SPIF). Citv Traffic
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine durine
therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector,
including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 befiveen Rancho Cordova
Parkway andHazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacfs on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the
eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 34.15-40. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This
improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector,
including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes rvith limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City
Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the
northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliarv lane that extends to and droos at the 3A.15-4s
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4t
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-
100
7t-
101
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit,
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision ivill pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures
3A.15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue
Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 f,astbound / Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that
Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the
northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 34.15-4u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off
ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound lPrairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City
Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parlcway OffRamp
Weave (Freeway WeaveT). To ensure that Eastbound US 50
operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A,l5-4u, v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full
3A.15-4u
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4v
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-
102
7t-
103
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
lvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure
that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkrvay Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch
Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27). To ensure
that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound
Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge
(Freeway Merge2T).
3A.15-4w
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4x
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-
104
7t-
105
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
This subdivision rvill pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
rvith the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). To ensure that
Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the
northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be
implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 35).

East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6). Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:
> Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150- foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
> Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 150- foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
> Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left- turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is
equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and
> Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization. Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels, A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, 3A.15-4y
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)

4.17-l
(Addendum
)
7l-
106
7l-
107
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Yes
The Capital Southeast
Connector -JPA has
executed a construction
contract with
Goodfellow Brothers,
Inc. to construct the
Capital Southeast
Connector from Prairie
City Road to East
Bidwell Street. The
construction contract
was executed in
December of 2020.

Grading and construction
commenced in April
2021 andwas completed
in April of 2023.The
project included the
relocation and
signalization of the
existing White Rock
Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The
owner/applicant will pay
the Sacramento County
Transportation
Development Fee prior
to issuance ofall
building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community
Development
Department has
revier,ved and approved
the improvement plans
for the construction of
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Prior to issuance of
phase 1 building
permits.

Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all geometric
improvements, with
the exception ofthe
second northbound
and plan area fees paid by the Project conhibute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers
Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 ofthe Addendum provides a
conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project's responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee.

The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be
considered to be implemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction of the new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell StreeVWhite Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry. Figure 4-4 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.
f,ast Bidwell Street/IVlangini Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry figure 4-5 of the Addendum):

4.17-2
(Addendum
)

4.17-3
(Addendum
)
7t-
108
7l-
109
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
these required
improvements including
the plans for the
modification to the
existing traffic signal at
the intersection of East
Bidwell Street and
Mangini Parkway. These
improvements have been
completed and accepted
by the City.

The required
improvements in this
condition have been
completed and accepted
by the City. These
improvements were
constructed as part of the
off-site improvements
for the Mangini Ranch
Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
thru lane prior to
issuance ofphase 1
building permits,
Construct the second
northbound thru lane
prior to issuance of
phase 2 building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with the
exception ofone thru
northbound lane prior
to issuance ofphase 1
building permits.

Construct the second
thru northbound lane
prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.
> Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second thru lane shall be developed 300 feet south ofthe intersection);
> Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
> Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.
f,ast Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry @igure 4-6 of the Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared
through-right lane with a 150-foot taper;
> Southbound approach: One leftturn lane in a 150-foot
pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;
> Westbound approach: One left turn lane in a 60-foot
pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;
> Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization, Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the future.

4.17-4
(Addendum
)
7t-
110
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit in
Phase 3
The Community
Development
Department has
approved the plans for
the reconstruction and
signalization of the East
Bidwell Street/Alder
Creek Parkway
intersection in
accordance with this
condition.

The Capital Southeast
Connector-JPA project
has been completed. The
Connector project will
implement and complete
Option A in this
condition. The
owner/applicant shall
implement the required
improvements to the
intersection in
compliance with this
condition prior to
issuance ofthe first
Certificate of Occupancy
in the Phase 3 portion of
the project.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Construct all
geometric
improvements with the
exception of one thru
northbound lane and
one thru southbound
lane prior to issuance
ofphase I building
permits. Construct the
second thru
northbound lane and
the second thru
southbound lane prior
to issuance ofphase 3
building permits.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits
East Bidwelt Street/Alder Creek Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 ofthe Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 150-foot
pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper. > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes. The
second southbound through lane can be dropped south of
Old Ranch Way.
> Westbound approach: One right turn lane, plus one left- turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate
geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions ofapproval from neighboring projects.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project
buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) belorv:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate
anticipated U-Turns. Expand or construct a signalized
intersection as follows:
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right turns. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a left/Uturn in 300-foot
pocket plus taper.
> Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot
pocket plus taper.
> Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U- turns.
> Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital
Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted
standards.

4.17-5
(Addendum
)

4.17-6
(Addendum
)
7t-
111
7l-
tt2
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Utilities and Service Systems
Yes
Yes
The Phase I Sanitary
Sewer infrastructure
including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the
Alder Creek Parkway
sewer lift station and
forced main to serve this
subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA
landowners and have
been completed and
accepted by the City and
are currently in
operation.

The City obtained a
letter from Regional San
which provides
verification that there is
adequate capacity in the
existing Regional San
conveyance and
treatment system to
accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance ofbuilding
permits for any project
phases.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance ofbuilding
permits for any project
phases.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy
intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound right turn requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater
Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and Off-Site
Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate
Financing Is Secured. Before the approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant($ ofall project phases shall submit proofto the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured through payment of the City's facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40,
"Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrastructure and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment
Capacity. The project applicant($ ofall project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new
wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative maplevel study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.
3A.16-1
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.16-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-
113
7l-
tl4
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
buildout. Confirmation
from Regional San lvas
required because the
Folsom Plan Area is
served by the existing
Regional San Lift
Station on Iron Point
Road. The City Sewer
Lift Station and Forced
Main which connects to
the Regional San Lift
Station has been
accepted by the City and
is cunently in operation.

The owner/applicant has
constructed the
necessary infrastructure
to provide potable water
to the subdivision. The
potable Phase 1 water
infrastructure for the
Folsom Plan Area has
been reviewed, approved
and accepted by the City
and is cunently in
operation.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance ofbuilding
permits for any project
phases.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute, Prior to approval of any smallJot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specifi c discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) ofthat project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability ofa reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and
improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.
3A.18-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-
115
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
The off-site potable
rvater infrastructure to
serve the subdivision has
been reviewed, approved
and accepted by the City
and is currently in
operation. In addition,
the City has verified that
the off-site potable water
infrastructure is adequate
to serve the subdivision.

This condition is not
applicable to this
subdivision. The water
supply for this
subdivision is provided
by the City of Folsom
Water Treatment Plant
rather than an Off-Site
Water Treatment Plant
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance ofbuilding
permits for any project
phases.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance
Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

Before the approval ofthe final subdivision map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, the project
applicant(s) of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shal1 be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction ofthe City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity
(if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected).

If an off-site water treatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on-site WTP alternative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval of the final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases. A certificate ofoccupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.
3A.18-2a
(FPASP
EIRnIS)
3A.18-2b
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7l-
tt6
7t-
tL7
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
approval of a future
TMP
The Community
Development
Department and the
Public Works
Department will work
closely to implement the
future Truck
Management Plan
(TMP) and coordinate
responses to any future
entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the
TMP and make sure the
requirements in this
condition of approval are
met to the satisfaction of
the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that quarry
trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. Highway

50. Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce
Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management
Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of
Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including
representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quanies with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic.

The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted.

The City of Folsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quarries, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities of the quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quany truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries.

For the foregoing reasons, the City ofFolsom considers itselfa "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some
discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if or other activities onsuch TMP calls for
Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
AIR-I-
Land
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
Additional Measures
7t-
118
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City r,vould follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the
environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical.

However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quany huck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described
above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or haffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009. March. Recommended Protocol for
Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version 2.2:7), or such different threshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if
any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than
significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant($ (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages
implementation of the following measures:

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City ofFolsom and funded by the truck applican($ for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway
segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. Each
projectJevel analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of
disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project- level analysis shall account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel hucks), and emission rates
representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. Ifthe incremental increase in cancer risk
determined by in the HRA exceeds 296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by
SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the
following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the
results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project
applicant(s) and the City ofFolsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said
mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan proiect applicant(s), and the City of Folsom.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
. Implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, iffeasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both
directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the
dispersion and filtration of mobile-source TACs
associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the trees reach maturity, which breaks the line of sight between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes.

These trees should be planted before occupation ofany
affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe construction of potentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of
these trees should be maintained through the duration of the quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing
maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant($.
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy
of the affected residences and schools:
' equip all affected residences and school buildings
developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle
Anesting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air
intake points to the interior rooms;
. use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from
roadway air pollution sources as possible; and
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
approval ofafuture
TMP,
The Community
Development
Department and the
Public Works
Department will work
closely to implement the
future Truck
Management Plan
(TMP) and coordinate
responses to any future
entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the
TMP and make sure the
requirements in this
condition of approval are
met to the satisfaction of
the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that rvould
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that quarry
trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. 50.
. develop and implement an ongoing education and
maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quany project applicant($ before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining
Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce
Exposure of Sensitive Recepfors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants.

When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety
improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the SPA and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the
unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions" such as the approval and Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-1-
Land
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-
119
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
implementation of specialized road improvements to
accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City ofFolsom considers itselfa "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. [n a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. Horvever, as the prefened, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of 45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
(Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive receptors to noise generated by quarry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above.

The City encourages implementation of the following
measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located
along the sides of roadway segments thatue identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted
using an approved three dimensional traffic noise modeling program (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each project-level
analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City ofFolsom for the purpose of
disclosure to the public and decision makers, The project- level analysis should account for the location of the
receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the percentage ofhearry trucks). Ifthe incremental increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by
the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be
employed, which may include the follor,ving:
> Model the benefits of soundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected
receptors not to exceed a total height ofeight feet (two- foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wa11), If this
mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
rubberized asphalt at the expense ofthe quarry truck
applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within
the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quany truck applicant(s).
> Implement the installation of rubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive
receptors that carry quarry hucks if soundwalls do not
provide adequate reduction oftraffic noise levels. The
inclusion ofrubberized asphalt would provide an
additional 3 to 5 dB oftraffic noise reduction. The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by the quarry truck applicant(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project
applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said
mitigation fees are paid.
> To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy of the affected residences and schools:
. Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed
construction plans ofresidences adjacent to affected
roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks.
. Determine the interior quarry truck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck
conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be
necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck
Resolution No. 10780
Page l5l of158

10/24/2023 Item No.9.

YesThe FPA landowners
have satisfied all of the
mitigation measures for
the design and
construction of the Phase
1 Water and Sewer
Backbone Infrastructure
to serve the first of
development in the FPA.

The Phase I backbone
Infrashucture was
completed and accepted
by the City in 201 8 and
is cunently in use in the
FPA and being owned
and operated by the City.

The off-site water
facility alternative
improvements were not
implemented. The water
for the FPA was
provided through the
conservation of existing
rvater in the City. The
new water supply
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance ofbuilding
permits for any project
phase, the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to the
City' s satisfaction the
fair share contribution
towards
implementation of
Backbone
Infrastructure and Off-
Site Water Facility
improvements and
associated required
mitigation as identifi ed
inthe Folsom South of
U.S. Highway 50
Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
(December 2014) or
the Revised Proposed
Off- S i t e W at er F ac i I ity
applicant($ should pay for the cost ofwindow package
upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated
windows) required to achieve the interior noise level
standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50
Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off- Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructure and off-site water facility alternative improvements. The project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed inlhe Folsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative
Declarat i on (December 20 1 4) :
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-1: Design above
ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and
implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-I: Prepare and
Implement NOX Reduction Plan
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure lll-2:Pay Off-site
Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-setNOX Emissions
Generated by Construction.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A
Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust
Control Plan.

N/A7l-
120
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
alternative was validated
in2014.

Alternative Addendum
to the FPASP EIR/EIS
(approved December
2012); as applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l: Conduct
Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and
Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement
Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement
Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western
Spadefoot Toad
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond
Turtle
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's
Hawk Nesting Habitat
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's
Hawk Foraging Habitat
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored
Blackbird
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting
Raptors
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9:Nesting Special
Status Birds and Migratory Birds
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status Bats
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement
Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l3: Conduct
Surveys to Identifr and Map Valley Needlegrass
Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization
Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l4: Secure
Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section
Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure
No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of
the U.S., and Waters of the State
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l5: Conduct Tree
Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland
Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and
Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect
Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat
Retained On-Site,
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-I1: American
Badger
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with
the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property treatment plans
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct
Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site
Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend
Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are
Encountered and Comply with California Health and
Safety Code Procedures.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-l: Prepare Site-
Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and
Implement Appropriate Recommendations.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monitor
Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and
Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Conhol
Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(b): Prepare and
Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control
Plan for the detention basin West of Prairie City Road.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire
Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and
Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VII-1: Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVI-I: Prepare and
Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3:North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-4 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V1-4 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-1 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Revised Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative
Addendum to the FPASP EINEIS (approved December 11,
2012):
> 3B.1-2a: Enhance Exterior Appearance ofStructural
Facilities.
> 38.1-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 38.l-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 38.l-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
> 38.2-1a: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX
Reduction Plan.
> 38.2-1c: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during
Construction.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> 3F.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors.
> 3B.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and
Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to
Acceptable Concentrations.
> 38.4-1a: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during
Construction.
> 38.4-lb Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water
Facilities Climate Action Plan.
> 3A.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 3A.5-lb: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform
Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be
Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education,
Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if
Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the
Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or
Avoidance as Required.
> 34.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California
Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 38.7-1a: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement
Required Measures.
> 38.7-1b: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency
Measures Into Final Pipeline Design.
> 38.7-4: Implement Corrosion Protection Measures.
> 38.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> 3B.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-
Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 3B.8-lb: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials
Management Plan.
> 3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.
> 38.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 38.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible
Materials.
> 38.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. > 38.9-1a: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and
Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> 3B.9-1b: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
> 3B.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for
Shuctural Facilities.
> 38.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet
Protection and On-site Containment.
> 3B.11-1a: Limit Conshuction Hours.
> 3B.11-1b: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment
and Staging.
> 38.11-lc: Maximize the Use of Noise Baniers,
> 38.11-ld: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction.
> 3B. I 1-1e: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a
Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints.
> 38.11-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization
Measures.
> 38.12-1: Provide for Continued RecreationalAccess as
Identified in Mitigation Measure 3.14-la.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
> 38.15-1a: Prepare Traffrc Control Plan.
> 38.15-lb: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions.
> 38.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert.
> 38.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and
Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize
Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
> 38.17-la: Implement Construction Dewatering Best
Management Practices,
> 38.17-1b: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program.
> 3A.18-1 : Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply
Availability.
> 3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water
Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site
Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate
Financing Is Secured.

Resolution No. 10780

10/24/2023 Item No.9.
': t1.
..,{...},1,i:i t..r"ilr-!-
Folsom City Council
Staff R ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the CitY Council move to adopt Resolution No.l1118 - A Resolution of the City Council Approving an Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for Facilities District No. 23 Improvement AreaNo. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase 1 c)

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On January 28,2014,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9298 approving the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP). The PFFP is an $877 million plan that includes the necessary backbone infrastructure and public facility requirements, presents a comprehensive financing strategy and sets forth the estimated time horizon for the future development of the Folsom Plan Area (FPA).

The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Maps for the Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision in the FPA were approved by the City Council on June 22,202I for the 4-Pack subdivision (Village 1) and Village Nos. 2 & 3 andon October 26,2021for the Village 4 subdivision. The Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision is included in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FpASp) and is planned for a total of 291multi-family low density (MLD) residential units in these (4) separate villages. The Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision is generally located on the north side of East White Rock Road, west of Savannah Parkway and south of Mangini Parkway in the FPA (See below). The Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision is required to 1 MEETING DATE: r012412023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 11 18 - A Resolution of the City Council Approving an Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for the Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase 1C)
FROM: Community Development Department

10/24/2023 Item No.10.
construct various on-site and off-site roadway and utility infrastructure and other public improvements necessary to serve the proposed development.

PmFct
,l
Phosa
tg'
.-:'Pock
Village 2
l,tin
{ I lfltr
', (tvp,l.."
,f.'.drct}''::|l,tA
.:,,,
At Gl6ir
* il r{.1r
Village 3
Mrq
rt t.ot!. 4?! il, llypl

5.d* ! Ac ${o$
*:
:
2 PROFOSED
MAF{GINI
PLACE

AFAEIMENTS

10/24/2023 Item No.10.
il
i' ll
:illa..
3!{t:." i
i!itir b
:a t: l ! 1: q:
;!
F{
$trtnsNt
F
I'H!F nL:f( Fi lLt.lll
U1IHITE ROCK ROAD
sourhtFAsl CONHFCTOq tFuruf,tgl
,il
On May 26,2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10435, a resolution approving the formation of Community Facilities District No. 23 (CFD No. 23), providing for the levy of special taxes therein, and adopted Resolution No. 10436, a resolution deeming it necessary to incur bond indebtedness in and for the City of Folsom CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No.

2. Special tax revenues generated from CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 will fund a portion of or in some cases all of the Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision's share of the public roadway and internal subdivision improvements, related environmental mitigation obligations and design and engineering costs.

Grading and construction of the first phase of the infrastructure and other various public improvements necessary to serve the Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision commenced in the Spring of 202L The roadway andutility infrastructure and other public improvements for the Mangini Ranch Phase 1C subdivision includes the construction of portions of Mangini Parkway, Savannah Parkway and White Rock Road, various subdivision village infrastructure (i.e. Mangini Ranch Phase lC, Village Nos. 1 through 4) and a future traffic a
-)Page 243
10/24/2023 Item No.10.
signal at the intersection of Mangini Parkway and Savannah Parkway. Arcadian Improvement Company,LLC, (developer) has completed the necessary roadway and utility infrastructure and other various public improvements to serve the four (4) villages in the Fall of2023.

POLICY / RIII,E
Chapter 5 of the Folsom Plan Area (FPA) Public Facilities Financing Plan authorizes the formation of CFD's to finance the construction, acquisition and servicing of backbone infrastructure and other public improvements
Section 2.5.3 of the First Amended and restated Tier 1 Development Agreement authorizes the formation of infrastructure CFD's
Resolution No. 9282 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982

ANALYSIS
In order to obtain reimbursement from proceeds from the sale of bonds for CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 for eligible roadway and utility infrastructure and public improvements approval of an Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement (Agreement) by the City Council is required. It is anticipated that the first bond sale for CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 ti generate bond proceeds for reimbursement will occur in the Winter/Spring of 202312024. The developer and the City are currently working together to achieve this goal.

The Agreement establishes the process required for the City to acquire the roadway and utility infrastructure and other various public improvements and the developer's responsibility for funding any construction cost shortfatl. A summary of the roadway and utility infrastructure and various public improvements and facilities to be funded and acquired by the City is shown in Exhibit A of the attached Acquisition and Shortfall Agieement (See Attachment2). The roadway and utility infrastructure and other public improvements authorized,to be acquired with CFD No. 23 Improvement AreaNo. 2 bond proceeds include roadway and transportation improvements (Mangini Parkway, Savannah Farkway and White Rock Road), various subdivision in-tract improvements (Villages 1 through 4), various water (potable and non-potable), sanitary sewer, and storm drainage mains as well as a landscaping and pedestrian/bike trail improvements. The Agreement requires the developer to complete the required roadway and utility infrastructure and other pnbtic improvements to the satisfaction of the City and meet specified thresholds in accordance with the Agreement prior to any reimbursement by the City. 4Page 244
10/24/2023 Item No.10.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
There is no direct financial impact on the City of Folsom. The CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 bonded indebtedness and expenses are solely the responsibility of CFD No. 23 Improvement AreaNo 2.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (bX3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Environmental review for the backbone infrastructure subject to this Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement was completed in the FPASP EIR dated June 14,20Il

ATTACHMENTS
1 . Resolution No. I 1 I 18 - A Resolution of the City Council Approving an Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement AreaNo. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase 1C)

2. Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement
Submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
5Page 245
10/24/2023 Item No.10.

ATTACHMENT 1
AResolution of the City CouncilApproving anAcquisition and Shortfall Agreement for the Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase 1C)

10/24/2023 Item No.10.

RESOLUTION NO. 11118

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN

ACQUISITION AND SHORTFALL AGREEMENT FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 23
IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 (MANGINI RANCH PHASE lC)
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 10435 declaring its intention to establish a community facilities district and to levy a special tax to pay for certain public improvements and public services in and for such community facilities district; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 10436 declaring the necessity to incur a bonded indebtedness to ftnance certain public improvements in and for the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase 1C); and
WHEREAS, Staff has prepared the attached Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for the proposed eligible public improvements of Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase 1C),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase lC) is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute said Agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this24thday of October2023, by the following roll-call vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Council Member(s)
Council Member(s)
Council Member(s)
Council Member(s)
Rosario Rodrigues, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. llll8
Page I of I Page 247
10/24/2023 Item No.10.

ATTACHMENT 2
Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for the Community Facilities District No. 23 ImprovementArea No. 2 (Mangini Ranch Phase lC)

10/24/2023 Item No.10.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 23
(FOLSOM RANCTT) TMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2

ACQUISITION AIID SHORTFALL AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

TIIE CITY OF FOLSOM
AND

ARCADIAN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC,
a California Limited Liability Company,
Dated as of _,2023

10/24/2023 Item No.10.

ACOI ]ISITION AND SHORTFALL AGREEMENT
City of Folsom Community Facilities District No.23
(Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No.2
Recitals
A. The parties to this Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement (the "Agreement") are the 6ITY OF FOLSOM, (the "City"), and ARCADIAN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company, ("Developer").

B. The effective date of this Agreement is 2023 ("Effective Date") C. The Developer intends to construct certain road, water, sewer and other public capital improvements, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (collectively, the "Acquisition Improvements") to serve the development of real property owned by Developer within the Folsom Plan Area and within the boundaries of the District described below. The public capital improvements are to be owned and operated by the City, and the financing is to be iccompliihed, in part, with funding to be provided by the District under and pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 - California Government Code Sections 53311 and following (the "Act").

D. On May 26,2020, the City adopted Resolution No. 10437 to form City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 2 (the "District" or "CFD 23") within the Folsom Plan Area to finance, among other authorized facilities, the Acquisition Improvements and, on the same date, a landowner election was conducted in which all of the votes were cast unanimously in favor of forming the District.

E. The District intends to levy special taxes and cause the Authority to issue CFD 23 Bonds to fund, among other things, a portion of the costs of the Acquisition Improvements. The proceeds of the District special taxes and CFD 23 Bonds, together with interest earned thereon, ire referred to herein as the "Available CFD 23 Proceeds." The Available CFD 23 Proceeds shall include the amount of (i) special taxes, if any, collected for a period of twenty (20) years beginning with the Fiscal Year in which: (a) the first building permit is issued in Improvement Area No. 1, or (b) the first series of bonds or other debt is issued in Improvement Area No. 2, whichever occurs first, available to fund the direct payment for the acquisition andlor construction of Acquisition Improvements and not related to or required to fund debt service or Administrative Expenses, as defined in and determined in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the District (the "Available Pay-Go Proceeds"), and (ii) the net acquisition p.o""edr generated by all CFD 23, Improvement Area No. 2 Bond sale(s) issued by the Authority and secured by CFD 23, Improvement Area No. 2 special taxes.

F. Attached hereto as EI[![!l1\ is a description of the Acquisition Improvements and attached hereto as Exhibit B is a description of certain authorized discrete and usable portions of the Acquisition Improvements that may be acquired from Developer pursuant to Section 53313.51 of the Act. It is understood that the Available CFD 23 Proceeds may not be sufficient to reimburse the Developer for all of the costs and expenses of the Acquisition I

10/24/2023 Item No.10.

Improvements contemplated hereunder, or otherwise finance said improvements. Accordingly, Developer understands and acknowledges that any shortfall in the Available Amount toward the construction and completion of the Acquisition Improvements is the Developer's sole responsibility, and that the Acquisition Price will be paid solely from the Available CFD 23 Proceeds, or from any proceeds that may become available for such payment through the SPIF Program (as defined herein) for an Acquisition Improvement included in the SPIF Program.

G. The parties anticipate that, upon completion of the Acquisition Improvements and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer in writing, the City will acquire the completed Acquisition Improvements.

H. Any and all monetary obligations of the City arising out of this Agreement are the special and limited obligations of the City payable only from the Available CFD 23 Proceeds, Jnd no other funds whatsoever of the District, the Authority, or the City shall be obligated therefor under any circumstances under this Agreement.

I. Attached to this Agreement are Exhibit A (the Acquisition Improvements), Exhibit B (Eligible Portions of Acquisition Improvements, including related Design Costs), nxninit C (form of Requisition), and Exhibit D (Insurance Requirements), all of which are incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes.

Agreement

ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS ; COMMI.'NITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FORMATION

AND FINANCING PLAN
Section 1.01. Definitions. As used herein, the following capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them below:
"Acceptable Title" means free and clear of all monetary liens, encumbrances, assessments, whether any such item is recorded or unrecorded, and taxes, except those items which are reasonably determined by the City Engineer, upon consultation with the City Afforney, not to interfere with the intended use and therefore are not required to be cleared from the title. "Acquisition and Construction Fund" means the "Community Facilities District No. 23 Improvement Area No. 2 Acquisition and Construction Fund" established by the District for the purpose of paying the Acquisition Prices of the Acquisition Improvements. "Acquisition Improvements" means the Acquisition Improvements described in Eb!D!! { hereto.
"Acquisition Price" means the total amount eligible to be paid to the Developer upon acquisition of the Acquisition Improvements as provided in Section 2.03, incltding any additional Available CFD 23 Proceeds collected thereafter that are eligible to be paid to Developer, but not to exceed the Actual Cost of the Acquisition Improvement, together with the CCI adjustment thereon until paid in full as provided herein. 2

10/24/2023 Item No.10.
"Actual Cost" means the total cost of the Acquisition Improvements, or Eligible Portions thereof, as documented by the Developer to the satisfaction of the City and as certified by the City Engineer in an Actual Cost Certificate including, without limitation, (a) the Developer's cosl of-constructing the Acquisition Improvements including grading, labor, material and equipment costs, (b) the Developer's cost of designing and engineering the Acquisition Impiovements, preparing the plans and specifications and bid documents for the Acquisition Improvements, ind the costs of inspection, materials testing and construction staking for the Acquisition Improvements, (c) the Developer's cost of any performance, payment and maintenance bonds and insurance, including title insurance, required hereby for the Acquisition Improvements, (d) the Developer's cost of any real property or interest therein that is either n.""5ury for the construction of the Acquisition Improvements (e.g., temporary construction easements, haul roads, etc.), or is required to be conveyed with such Acquisition Improvement in order to convey Acceptable Title thereto to the City or its designee, (e) the Developer's cost of environmental evaluation or mitigation required for the Acquisition Improvements, (0 the amount of any fees actually paid by the Developer to the City and any other governmental agencies in order to obtain permits, licenses or other necessary governmental approvals and reviews for the Acquisition Improvements, (g) the Developer's cost for construction and project management, administration and supervision services for the Acquisition Improvements, (h) the Developer's cost for professional services related to the Acquisition Improvements, including engineering, accounting , legal, financial, appraisal and similar professional services, and (i) the coits of construction financing incurred by the Developer with respect to the Acquisition Improvements.
"Actual Cost Certificate" means a certificate prepared by the Developer detailing the Actual Cost of the Acquisition Improvements, or Eligible Portions thereol to be acquired hereunder, as may be revised by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 2.03. "Agreement" means this Acquisition Agreement, dated as of "Authority" means the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority. "Available CFD 23 Proceeds" shall have the meaning assigned to the term in Recital E. "Available Pay-Go Proceeds" shall have the meaning assigned to the term in Recital E. uCCl'means the construction cost index reported by the Engineering News Record used by the City to adjust construction costs, currently based on the average of the change in the San Fiancisco Construction Cost Index and the change in the 20-city Construction Cost Index for the 12-month period ending in May, or comparable index of annual construction costs for public capital improvements used by the City.
"CFD Administrator" means the administrator of the District appointed by the City. "CFD 23 Bonds" means bonds or other indebtedness issued by the Authority that are to be repaid with District Special Taxes.
"City" means City of Folsom.
,2023
J

10/24/2023 Item No.10.
"City Engineer" means the City Engineer of the City or his/her designee who will be responsible for administering the acquisition of the Acquisition Improvements hereunder. "Code" means the Government Code of the State of California. "Construction Lender" means Goodfellow Bros., Inc., a Washington corporation, its successors and assigns.
"Developer" means ARCADIAN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company, their successors and assigns. "Director" means the Director of the Crty's Community Development Department or his/her designee.
"Disbursement Request Form" means a requisition for payment of funds from the Acquisition and Construction Fund for an Acquisition Improvement, or an Eligible Portion thereof, in substantially the form contained in Exhibit C hereto. "District" shall have the meaning assigned to the term in Recital D. "Eligible Portions" means the eligible, discrete and usable portions of the Acquisition Improvements available for acquisition and payment of Installment Payments listed and described in Eblbit B hereto.
"Installment Payment" means an amount approved by the City Engineer as partial payment toward the Actual Cost of an Eligible Portion as shown in Exhibit B-Description of Eligible Portions of Acquisition Improvements.
"Project" means the Developer's development of the property in the District, including the design and construction of the Acquisition Improvements and the other public and private improvements to be constructed by the Developer within the District. "special Taxes" means annual special taxes, and prepayments thereof, authorized by and to be levied by the District.
"Title Documents" means, for the Acquisition Improvements acquired hereunder, a gtant deed or similar instrument necessary to transfer title to any real property or interests therein (including easements), or an irrevocable offer of dedication of such real property with interests therein necessary to the operation, maintenance, rehabilitation and improvement by the City of the Acquisition Improvements (including, if necessary, easements for ingress and egress) and a bill of sale or similar instrument evidencing transfer of title to the Acquisition Improvements (other than said real property interests) to the City, where applicable.

Section 1.02. Establishment of Community Facilities District. The Community Facilities District was established by the City on May 26, 2020, and through the successful landowner election held that same day, the District is authorized to levy the Special Taxes and to issue the CFD 23 Bonds to finance the Acquisition Prices for the Acquisition Improvements.

Developer and the City agree to reasonably cooperate with one another and with the District in 4

10/24/2023 Item No.10.
the completion of the financing through the issuance by the Authority of the CFD 23 Bonds in one or more series andlor the collection of Special Taxes to generate Available Pay-Go Proceeds.

Section 1.03. Deposit and Use of Available CFD 23 Proceeds' (a) Developer Pay-Go Proceeds. Available Pay-Go Proceeds collected by the District shall be deposited in the Acquisition and Construction Fund established by the District, and may be disbuised to pay the Acquisition Price and Installment Payments of Acquisition Improvements in accordanie with Article II of this Agreement. All funds in the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall be considered a portion of the Available CFD 23 Proceeds. (b) CFD 23 Bond Series. Upon the delivery of each issue or issues of CFD 23 Bonds, the net proceeds thereof shall be deposited into the Acquisition and Construction Fund for the purpose of holding all funds for the Acquisition Improvements. All earnings on amounts in the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall remain in the Acquisition and Construction Fund for use as provided herein. Money in the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall be available to respond to delivery of a Disbursement Request Form and to be paid to the Developer or its designee to pay the Acquisition Price and Installment Payments of the Acquisition Improvements, or portions thereof, as specified in Article II hereof. (c) The Available CFD 23
Proceeds will be used primarilY to fund the costs of the Acquisition Improvements, and then to fund the costs of any other developer improvements advanced andlor constructed by a developer within the Plan Area that are authorized for acquisition by the District. The Available CFD 23 Proceeds shall be used first to fund any of the Acquisition Improvements, in any order, as and when each Acquisition Improvement or Eligible Portion is completed and payment of the Acquisition PriCe or Installment Payment can be paid to Developer as provided herein' Upon completion of all of the Acquisition Improvements hereunder and payment of the Acquisition Pricis therefor, any remaining funds in the Acquisition and Construction Fund (less any amount determined by the District as necessary to reserve for claims against the account) shall be (i) applied or rlserved for application to pay the costs of any other authorized developer improvements and, to the extent not so used, (ii) shall be applied by the District to call Bonds or to reduce Special Taxes as the District shall determine.

Section 1.04. No Effect of CFD Fundine on SPIF Pavments. If and to the extent any of the Acquisition Improvements are also included for financing within the Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee Program (the "SPIF Program"), any payments hereunder from Available CFD 23 Proceeds to Deviloper for such Acquisition Improvements shall not affect or limit Developer's ability to obtain and apply fee credits against and/or fee reimbursements from the SPIF Fee Program in consideration of its construction of the Acquisition Improvements that are included for financing in the SPIF Program. Developer's right to any such fee credits and/or fee reimbursements from the SPIF Program would be subject to and contingent upon Developer's entering into and complying with the requirements of a separate SPIF Fee Reimbursement Agreement to be entered'into between the City and Developer for the Acquisition Agreements that are included for financing in the SPIF Program.

Section 1.05. No or City Liabilitv: Citv No Effect on Other Asreements. In no event shall any actual or alleged act by the District or the 5 City or any actual