Folsom City Council
November 14, 2023

1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 November 14, 2023
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV
City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14
More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, November 14, 2023 6:30 PM
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council Meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Presentation Regarding Historic District Shuttle Program

2. City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2023-24 First Quarter Financial Reports

3 CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

3. Ordinance No. 1339 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 6 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)

4. Resolution No. 11123 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. for Economic Development Consulting Services

5. Resolution No. 11124 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with OpenGov, Inc. for Budgeting and Planning Software

6. Resolution No. 11125 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with National Auto Fleet Group for Four Fire Department Dodge Ram Pickup Trucks

7. Resolution No. 11126 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order with B&M Builders, Inc. for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project, Project No. PW2102 and Appropriation of Funds

8. Resolution No. 11127 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288S21 for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project

9. Resolution No. 11128 – A Resolution Adopting the City of Folsom Title VI Implementation Plan PUBLIC HEARING:

10. Resolution No. 11129 - A Resolution Adopting the November 2023 Adjustment for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Infrastructure Fees (SPIF) and Setting the Updated Amount of the SPIF Fees

11. 1014 Sibley Street Subdivision
i. Ordinance No. 1340 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom to Amend the Zoning Designation for the 0.87-Acre Project Site (APN: 071-0200-056-0000) from R-M PD (Residential Multifamily Dwelling District, Planned Development) and R-4 (General Apartment District) to R-1-M PD (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Small Lot District, Planned Development) for the 1014 Sibley Street Project (Introduction and First Reading) ii. Resolution No. 11122 – A Resolution to Approve a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Planned Development Permit, Design Review Application, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Six-Lot 1014 Sibley Street Subdivision Project
OLD BUSINESS:

12. Landmark Tree Designation – Urban Forester Recommendations to Establish Two New Landmark Tree Designations
i. Resolution No. 11130 – A Resolution Establishing Landmark Tree Designations for the Native Woodlands at the Folsom State Prison Property at 300 Prison Road ii. Resolution No. 11131 – A Resolution Establishing Landmark Tree Designations for Native Oaks within the City-Owned Segment of the Oak Parkway Trail Corridor

4 13. Resolution No. 11116 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Sacramento Tree Foundation for Tree Programs and Tree Planting and Maintenance for Three Years Commencing 2023
COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:

CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

COUNCIL COMMENTS:

ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentation Regarding Historic District Shuttle Program FROM: City Clerk's Department

CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Representatives from the Folsom Historic District Association will provide a presentation regarding the Historic Folsom green micro-transit shuttle service. No action is requested of the City Council.

Respectfully submitted,
Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk

11/14/2023 Item No.1.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing.

11/14/2023 Item No.1.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2023-24 First Quarter Financial Reports
FROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation from the Finance Director for the City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2023-24 First Quarter Financial Reports.

POLICY / RULE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.

Section 3.02.050 (b) of the Folsom Municipal Code states “…. within 30 days after the end of each quarter during the fiscal year, and more often if required by the City Council, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a financial and management report.” Submitted,

Elaine Andersen Stacey Tamagni
City Manager Finance Director/CFO
ATTACHMENT:

1. First Quarter Financial Report Fiscal Year 2023-24

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

City of Folsom
Quarterly Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2023-24 First Quarter
November 14, 2023
Prepared by the Office of Management and Budget
Financial Analysis and Reporting Division

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

Table of Contents
Section Page No.

Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................. 1 Financial Results
a) General Fund .................................................................................... 2 b) Enterprise Funds .............................................................................. 4 c) Other Funds ...................................................................................... 6 City Housing Fund ................................................................................... 6 Risk Management .................................................................................... 6 Lighting and Landscape Districts ............................................................ 6 Plan Area Impact Fees ............................................................................. 7 Appendix
Combined General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement ................. 8 General Fund Departmental Expenditure Summary ............................... 9 Housing Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement ............................... 10 Lighting and Landscaping District Statement ....................................... 11 Water Fund Revenue & Expense Statement ......................................... 14 Wastewater Fund Revenue & Expense Statement ................................ 15 Solid Waste Fund Revenue & Expense Statement ................................ 16

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
1 First Quarter Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Introduction
This financial report provides an overview of the City’s unaudited financial position through the first quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 (July 1, 2023, through September 30, 2023) for (1) the General Fund, (2) Housing Special Revenue Fund and L&L Districts, (3) the major enterprise operating funds, and (4) the Risk Management Internal Service Fund.

Notable cumulative first quarter to first quarter and budget to actual comparisons are included in this report in addition to year-end projections.

Executive Summary
The City’s General Fund unassigned fund balance at the end of FY 2022-23 was $22.96 million (unaudited), or 21.36% of expenditures.

As of the first quarter of FY 2023-24, projected year-end General Fund revenues are $110.2 million and projected expenditures are $110.1 million, resulting in a slight increase ($77k) to the unassigned fund balance by the end of the fiscal year, bringing it up to $23.04 million, but this results in a projected decrease in the unassigned fund balance as a percentage of expenditures, down to 20.93% from 21.36%. Below is a chart of the unassigned fund balance over the last ten years and displays the projected change from FY 2022-23 to FY 2023-24.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
$22,000,000
$24,000,000
$26,000,000
$28,000,000
$30,000,000
FY15
Actual
FY16
Actual
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY20
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Actual
FY23
Unaudited
FY24
Projected
Unassigned General Fund Balance
Unassigned Fund Balance % of Expenditures
$19,200,703

21.38%
$13,776,114

14.44%
$22,961,940
$15,529,576 21.36%

19.90%
$23,260,484

23.69% $23,039,324

20.93%
$8,157,227

11.54%
$15,699,123

18.44%
$10,950,323

14.73%
$17,397,043

20.09%

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
2 General Fund: Operating Revenues
The following table includes cumulative revenue comparisons through the first quarter of FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24 and a revenue budget comparison for FY 2023-24 with year-end projections.

General Fund operating revenues through the first quarter are $9.68 million, which is 19.09% greater than the same period in FY 2022-23. Revenues are at 8.86% of the budget through the first quarter of the current year, primarily due to the timing associated with receiving some of the larger revenue sources. For instance, property tax is the largest General Fund revenue source, and funding is received in two installments, of which none has been received.

The following is an explanation of the notable variances:
• Sales tax revenues exceeded last year’s first quarter by 8.91% or $173,000. The most recent sales tax data shows the categories of general retail and construction decreasing over the same period the prior year, while food products, transportation and business to business are up slightly. Inflation is the biggest factor in the increased sales tax over the same quarter last fiscal year, most significantly affecting the cost of gasoline and food. Based on the latest sales tax forecast, sales tax is trending to end the year below the budget at $28.45 million, an increase from the prior year of $352,000 or 1.25%. Below is a graph showing sales tax revenue for the current fiscal year and the past five fiscal years. This illustrates the flattening of the sales tax growth.

FY 22-23 Actual FY 23-24 Actual FY 23-24 FY 23-24 Over/Under % of Sept. 30, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 Budget Projected Budget Budget Property Tax 1,627 $ - $ 40,094,946 $ 40,094,946 $ - $ 100% Sales Tax 1,941,331 2,114,350 29,257,969 28,454,426 (803,543) 97% Transient Occupancy Tax - - 2,375,000 2,375,000 - 100%
Charges for Services 3,044,885 3,652,351 12,673,834 13,484,316 810,483 106% License, Permits & VLF 1,188,528 1,939,713 13,369,466 14,123,846 754,380 106% Transfers In 1,138,186 1,673,581 7,484,724 7,484,724 - 100% All Other 397,637 258,729 3,934,000 4,121,813 187,813 105% Subtotal Revenue $ 9,638,723 7,712,193 $ 109,189,938 $ 110,139,071 $ 949,133 $ 100.87% ARPA 415,633 40,489 40,489 40,489 -
Total Revenue $ 9,679,212 8,127,826 $ 109,230,427 $ 110,179,560 $ 949,133 $ 100.87% -
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY20
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Actual
FY23
Budget
FY24
Projection
FY24
Sales Tax
$28,102,379 $27,900,779
$25,846,985
$22,616,404
$25,359,293
$29,257,96
$28,454,426

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
3 • Charges for services, including building and engineering fees, Parks and Recreation user fees, and ambulance fees are at $3.65 million through the first quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year at $13.48 million.

The current projection is $810,000 more than the FY 2023-24 budget amount of $12.67 million. Community Development charges are at $1.01 million through the first quarter and are currently projected to end the fiscal year at $2.95 million. Compared to the FY 2023-24 budget this would be an increase of $680,000 or 30%.

The projected increase in Community Development charges is due to the anticipated recognition of deferred revenue related to the projected increase in development service activity costs in the Folsom Plan Area. • License and permit fees and Vehicle License Fees (VLF) quarter to quarter increased $751,000 and are projected to end the fiscal year at $14.12 million which would be an increase of $754,000 compared to the budget.
• Miscellaneous revenues decreased 34.93% or $139,000, through the first quarter when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.

General Fund: Department Operating Expenditures
The following table includes cumulative first quarter actual expenditure comparisons for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24 and an expenditure budget-to-actual comparison for FY 2023-24.

Overall, cumulative first quarter General Fund expenditures increased 3.73% compared to the first quarter of the prior year and are coming in at 23.41% percent of the budget through the first quarter of FY 2023-24. The projection for the end of the fiscal year is for expenditures to be at $110.1 million, which would be $872,000 more than the budgeted amount or 100.8% of budget. The projected increase in expenditures is primarily due to the anticipated increase in contract costs related to development services.

The table below shows a comparison for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24 for each General Fund Department.

FY 22-23 Actual FY 23-24 Actual FY 23-24 FY 23-24 Over/Under % of Sept. 30, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 Budget Projected Budget Budget Salaries 10,772,309 $ 11,770,687 $ 47,758,143 $ 47,518,510 $ (239,633) $ 99.5% Benefits 6,752,672 7,297,643 30,681,059 30,433,042 (248,017) 99.2% O&M 6,395,117 5,592,101 27,332,005 28,691,403 1,359,398 105.0% Capital Outlay 597,445 777,404 3,110,589 3,110,589 - 100.0% Debt Service 130,346 130,347 348,631 348,631 - 100.0%
Total Expenditures $ 25,568,181 24,647,890 $ 109,230,427 $ 110,102,175 $ 871,748 $ 100.8% FY 22-23 Actual FY 23-24 Actual FY 23-24 FY 23-24 Over/Under % of Sept. 30, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 Budget Projected Budget Budget General Government 2,118,751 $ 2,312,312 $ 10,522,797 $ 10,522,797 $ - $ 100.0% Police 6,846,868 6,982,129 27,377,097 26,988,053 (389,043) 98.6% Fire 6,102,090 7,074,910 28,040,510 27,948,054 (92,456) 99.7% Community Development 1,787,304 1,773,994 6,931,059 8,284,306 1,353,247 119.5% Parks & Recreation 4,049,858 4,011,560 17,107,167 17,107,167 - 100.0% Library 416,848 502,499 2,127,267 2,127,267 - 100.0%
Public Works 1,746,139 2,112,321 8,728,808 8,728,808 - 100.0% Non-Departmental 1,580,032 798,455 8,395,722 8,395,722 - 100.0% Total Expenditures $ 25,568,181 24,647,890 $ 109,230,427 $ 110,102,175 $ 871,748 $ 100.8%

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
4 The following is an explanation of the department specific variances of year-end projections as compared to the budget:
• Police Department is projected to end the year under budget by $389,000 due to vacant positions for a portion of the year.
• Fire Department is projected to end the year under budget by $92,000 due to vacant positions for a portion of the year.
• Community Development Department is projected to end the fiscal year $1.35 million (19.5%) over the budgeted amount, which is mostly due to increases in contract costs that are partially offset by increased revenues.

Enterprise Funds:

Water Fund
The Water Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the following funds: Water Impact, Water Operating, Water Capital, and Water Meters.

The table below includes cumulative first quarter actual revenue and expense comparisons for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24 and a budget to actual comparison for FY 2023-24 for the Water Operating Fund.

The Water Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $19.28 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out are projected to end the year at $18.63 million, or 100% of the budget. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $6.54 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $18.84 million.

FY 22-23 Actual FY 23-24 Actual FY 23-24 FY 23-24 Over/Under % of Sept. 30, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 Budget Projected Budget Budget Program Revenues 4,996,145 $ 5,395,877 $ 19,278,300 $ 19,278,300 $ - $ 100.0% Salaries 797,906 863,434 3,785,497 3,785,497 - 100.0%
Benefits 565,760 605,840 2,588,958 2,588,958 - 100.0%
Operating Expenses 1,571,433 1,273,165 9,168,854 9,168,854 - 100.0% Transfers Out 225,529 235,348 1,239,209 1,239,209 - 100.0% Debt Service 3,000 3,000 1,842,428 1,842,428 - 100.0%
$ 2,980,787 3,163,628 $ 18,624,946 $ 18,624,946 $ - $ 100.00% Capital Expenses 548,347 $ 490,084 $ 6,517,379 $ 6,538,540 $ 21,161 $ 100.32% Working Capital $ 18,836,021 24,721,207 $

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
5 Wastewater Fund
The Wastewater Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Wastewater and Wastewater Capital Funds.

The Wastewater Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $11.96 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $6.41 million, or 100% of the budget. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $4.5 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $22.75 million.

Solid Waste Fund
The Solid Waste Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Solid Waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, and Solid Waste Plan Area Capital.

The Solid Waste Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $25.97 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $19.61 million, or 100% of the budget. Total expenditures for capital outlay costs are estimated to be $3.29 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $18.18 million.

FY 22-23 Actual FY 23-24 Actual FY 23-24 FY 23-24 Over/Under % of Sept. 30, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 Budget Projected Budget Budget Program Revenues 3,806,061 $ 3,924,707 $ 11,963,700 $ 11,963,700 $ - $ 100.00% Salaries 427,170 464,163 1,979,351 1,979,351 - 100.00%
Benefits 325,113 334,793 1,435,294 1,435,294 - 100.00%
Operating Expenses 325,769 189,375 2,246,776 2,246,776 - 100.00% Transfers Out 180,951 176,450 743,616 743,616 - 100.00% Debt Service - - - - - - $ 1,164,781 1,259,003 $ 6,405,037 $ 6,405,037 $ - $ 100.00% Capital Expenses 231,701 $ 868,063 $ 4,582,140 $ 4,582,140 $ - $ 100.00% Working Capital $ 22,744,939 21,768,416 $
FY 22-23 Actual FY 23-24 Actual FY 23-24 FY 23-24 Over/Under % of Sept. 30, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 Budget Projected Budget Budget Program Revenues 7,519,212 $ 8,605,297 $ 25,973,000 $ 25,973,000 $ - $ 100.0% Salaries 903,943 1,053,600 4,731,876 4,731,876 - 100.0% Benefits 730,535 808,475 3,512,580 3,512,580 - 100.0%
Operating Expenses 1,586,609 1,146,693 9,702,783 9,702,783 - 100.0% Transfers Out 409,409 401,525 1,663,916 1,663,916 - 100.0% Debt Service - - - - - 0.0%
$ 3,410,293 3,630,496 $ 19,611,155 $ 19,611,155 $ - $ 100.0% Capital Expenses - $ 10,822 $ 3,286,076 $ 3,286,076 $ - $ 100.0% Working Capital $ 18,179,457 15,103,688 $

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
6 Other Funds
City Housing Fund
The City Housing Fund as of September 30, 2023 had a cash balance of $13.3 million. The City Council has previously approved housing project loans in an amount up to $3.5 million for the Scholar Way project of which $2.75 million has now been expended.

Risk Management Internal Service Fund
The Risk Management Fund captures the activity associated with employee and retiree health, dental and vision insurance, workers’ compensation, and liability insurance expense.

As of September 30, 2023, the City has paid $1.65 million for health, vision, and dental insurance for active employees and $762,243 for retired employees and $613,787 for workers’ compensation. Liability insurance payments were $4.34 million. The total expenditures for FY 2023-24 are projected at $21.68 million, which is an increase from the prior fiscal year of $1.09 million which is mostly seen in health insurance, workers compensation, and liability costs.

The projected ending unrestricted net position is $3.72 million, a planned $962,423 decrease from FY 2022-23.

Lighting and Landscape Funds
There are 30 Lighting and Landscape (L&L) Districts in the City of Folsom. Each District has its own budget and maintenance requirements to maintain various assets ranging from shrub beds, mini parks, walls, fences, monument signs, streetlights, bollards, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, artwork, a waterfall, walkways/trails, open space, trees, and electrical services.

Below is a summary list of the main projects or activities that occurred in our L&L Districts during July, August, and September 2023:

District Project Date Cost
Willow Springs Mulch Spreading on McAdoo 9/29/2023 $19,500.00 Blue Ravine Oaks Fence Replacement 8/21/2023 $6,927.42
Prospect Ridge Weed Abatement 7/28/2023 $11,800.00
American River
Canyon North
Sidewalk Replacement 7/31/2023 $2,547.12
Willow Creek states
South
Brick Entry Monument Repair 7/1/2023 $1,958.08
Other activities that have taken place in the L&L’s this quarter include:
 Completed weed abatement in all areas on time.
 Appointed new committee member to the Landscape and Lighting District Advisory Committee (Broadstone 3, Craig Enos).

11/14/2023 Item No.2.
7 Plan Area Impact Fees
Total Plan Area Impact Fees received through the first quarter of FY 2023-24 were $5.62 million. Expenditures during the first quarter totaled approximately $2.1 million in all Plan Area Impact Fee funds. Expenditures were for Fire Station 34 construction, and Prospector Park construction.

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX A
City of Folsom, California
Combined General Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
FY 2023 FY 2024 FY24 Forecast
As of As of FY 2023 FY 2024 As of
9/30/2022 9/30/2023 ACTUAL BUDGET 9/30/2023 $ % $ %
REVENUES:

Taxes:

Property 1,627 $ - $ 37,224,284 $ 40,094,946 $ 40,094,946 $ - $ 100% (40,094,946) $ 0% Sales And Use 1,941,331 2,114,350 28,102,378 29,257,969 28,454,426 (803,543) 97% (27,143,619) 7% Transient Occupancy - - 2,496,365 2,375,000 2,375,000 - 100% (2,375,000) 0% Real Property Transfer - - 1,027,125 900,000 900,000 - 100% (900,000) 0% Franchise Fees - - 831,235 817,000 817,000 - 100% (817,000) 0% Other - (391,660) 1,236,529 1,187,500 1,187,500 - 100% (1,579,160) -33% Licenses And Permits 1,389,721 1,855,534 3,944,073 3,293,325 3,968,037 674,712 120% (1,437,791) 56% Intergovernmental 214,440 124,668 12,665,805 10,116,630 10,196,298 79,668 101% (9,991,962) 1% Charges For Current Services 3,044,885 3,652,351 15,423,489 12,673,834 13,484,316 810,483 106% (9,021,483) 29% Fines And Forfeitures 10,044 6,542 134,751 106,000 110,519 4,519 104% (99,458) 6% Interest 145,915 346,320 894,693 250,000 383,836 133,836 154% 96,320 139% Miscellaneous 241,678 297,527 1,242,559 673,500 722,958 49,458 107% (375,973) 44% Operating Transfers In 1,138,186 1,673,581 6,134,877 7,484,724 7,484,724 - 100% (5,811,143) 22%

TOTAL REVENUES 9,679,212 8,127,826 111,358,164 109,230,427 110,179,560 949,133 100.87% (99,551,216) 8.86%

EXPENDITURES:

Current Operating:

General Government 2,937,729 $ 3,086,016 $ 13,986,265 $ 15,268,331 $ 15,268,331 $ - $ 100% 12,182,315 $ 20% Public Safety 12,897,788 13,962,116 51,602,104 55,046,743 54,565,244 (481,499) 99% 41,084,626 25% Public Ways and Facilities 1,746,139 2,112,321 8,308,069 8,728,808 8,728,808 - 100% 6,616,487 24% Community Services 1,787,304 1,773,994 9,175,089 6,931,059 8,284,306 1,353,247 120% 5,157,066 26% Culture and Recreation 3,698,897 3,835,279 16,852,994 14,859,764 14,859,764 - 100% 11,024,485 26% Non-Departmental 1,580,032 798,455 7,588,332 8,395,722 8,395,722 - 100% 7,597,267 10% Operating Transfers Out - - - - - - -
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 25,568,181 24,647,890 107,512,853 109,230,427 110,102,175 871,748 100.8% 83,662,246 23% APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE (15,888,970) (16,520,064) 3,845,311 - 77,385 FUND BALANCE, JULY 1 30,764,358 26,919,048 26,919,046 30,764,357 30,764,357 FUND BALANCE 14,875,389 10,398,985 30,764,357 30,764,357 30,841,742 NONSPENDABLE FUND BALANCE (1,861,332) (292,908) (1,507,764) (1,861,332) (1,507,764)

RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE - - - - -

COMMITTED FUND BALANCE - - - - -
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE (1,554,459) (314,050) (6,294,654) - (6,294,654) UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE $ 11,459,597 9,792,027 $ 22,961,940 $ 28,903,025 $ 23,039,324 $

VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget Acutal vs Budget

VARIANCE
8

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX B
City of Folsom, California
Expenditure Summary - General Fund DepartmentsQuarter Ended September 30, 2023 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY24 Forecast
As of As of FY 2023 FY 2024 As of
9/30/2022 9/30/2023 ACTUAL BUDGET 9/30/2023 $ % $ %
EXPENDITURES:

City Council 24,237$ 28,658$ 118,539$ 117,437$ 117,437$ -$ 100.00% (88,779)$ 24% City Manager 273,868$ 310,980 1,207,939 1,356,732 1,356,732 - 100.00% (1,045,752) 23% City Clerk 152,091$ 165,427 694,280 681,049 681,049 - 100.00% (515,622) 24% Office of Mgmt & Budget 1,253,346$ 1,306,128 5,556,187 6,246,759 6,246,759 - 100.00% (4,940,631) 21% City Attorney 278,009$ 280,937 1,307,443 1,234,309 1,234,309 - 100.00% (953,372) 23% Human Resources 137,200$ 220,183 673,714 886,511 886,511 - 100.00% (666,328) 25% Police 6,846,868$ 6,982,129 26,259,847 27,377,097 26,988,053 (389,043) 98.58% (20,394,967) 26% Fire 6,102,090$ 7,074,910 25,620,154 28,040,510 27,948,054 (92,456) 99.67% (20,965,600) 25% Community Development 1,787,304$ 1,773,994 9,175,089 6,931,059 8,284,306 1,353,247 119.52% (5,157,066) 26% Parks & Recreation 4,049,858$ 4,011,560 18,810,497 17,107,167 17,107,167 - 100.00% (13,095,607) 23% Library 416,848$ 502,499 2,192,763 2,127,267 2,127,267 - 100.00% (1,624,768) 24% Public Works 1,746,139$ 2,112,321 8,308,069 8,728,808 8,728,808 - 100.00% (6,616,487) 24% Other -$ - - - - - -
Non Departmental 1,580,032$ 798,455 7,588,332 8,395,722 8,395,722 - 100.00% (7,597,267) 10% Operating Transfers Out - - - - - - -
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: 24,647,890$ 25,568,181$ 107,512,853$ 109,230,427$ 110,102,175$ 871,748$ 100.80% (83,662,246)$ 23%

VARIANCE
Actual vs. Budget

VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget
9

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX C
City of Folsom, California
Housing Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
FY 2024 FY24 Forecast
As of FY 2023 FY 2024 As of
9/30/2023 ACTUAL BUDGET 9/30/2023 $ % $ %
REVENUES:

Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Intergovernmental - - - - - -
Charges for Current Services 4,558 14,730 20,000 20,000 - 100% (15,442) 23% Impact Fee Revenue 1,587,171 4,176,929 300,000 1,587,171 1,287,171 529% 1,287,171 529% Interest Revenue 165,186 385,276 250,000 250,000 - 100% (84,814) 66% Other Revenue - (129,762) 56,402 56,402 - 100% (56,402) 0% Operating Transfers In - - - - - -
TOTAL REVENUES 1,756,915 4,447,173 626,402 1,913,573 1,287,171 305% 1,130,513 280% EXPENDITURES:

Salary & Benefits -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Services & Supplies - - - - - -
Contracts 49,653 75,909 575,000 575,000 - 100% 525,347 9% Insurance - - - - - -
Other Operating Expenses - 12,509 40,300 40,300 - 100% 40,300 0% Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Extroardinary Loss on Dissolution of RDAs - - - - - -
Operating Transfers Out 2,776 115,529 11,102 11,102 - 100% 8,327 25%

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 52,428 203,947 626,402 626,402 - 100% 573,974 8% APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE 1,704,487 4,243,226 - 1,287,171 FUND BALANCE, JULY 1 42,032,267 37,789,041 42,032,267 42,032,267 FUND BALANCE 43,736,754$ 42,032,267$ 42,032,267$ 43,319,438$ NONSPENDABLE FUND BALANCE (30,574,421) (30,575,079) (42,032,267) (43,319,438)

RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE - - - -

COMMITTED FUND BALANCE - - - -

ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE - - - -
UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) 13,162,334$ 11,457,188$ -$ -$

VARIANCE
Actual vs Budget

VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget
10

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
Fund 204 Fund 205 Fund 207 Fund 208 Fund 209 Fund 210 Fund 212 Fund 213 Fund 214 Fund215 Fund 231 Fund 232 Fund 234 Briggs Natoma Folsom Broadstone Hannaford Lake Natoma Cobble Hills Prairie Sierra Natoma Cobble Los Cerros Ranch Station Heights Unit 3 Broadstone Cross Shores Reflect Oaks #2 Estates Valley Ridge Revenues:

Special Assessment - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest 1,291 - - 453 241 1,633 - 927 - 3,320 220 2,613 1,238 Other Revenue - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Revenue $ 1,291 $ - $ - $ 453 $ 241 $ 1,633 $ - $ 927 $ - $ 3,320 $ 220 $ 2,613 $ 1,238 Expenditures:

Communications - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 2,740 4,971 21,232 2,655 194 58,892 1,063 1,407 4,504 - 262 1,584 627 Contracts 1,627 3,886 8,605 517 259 14,182 1,399 1,170 2,742 259 741 2,314 712 Maintenance 2,567 5,572 11,216 - 68 - 1,675 1,470 2,102 8,511 711 15,138 682 Supplies - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transfers Out 303 581 1,354 117 195 1,252 128 122 356 301 44 320 77 Total Expenditures $ 7,237 $ 15,010 $ 42,407 $ 3,289 $ 716 $ 74,326 $ 4,265 $ 4,169 $ 9,704 $ 9,071 $ 1,758 $ 19,356 $ 2,098 11

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
Fund 236 Fund 237 Fund 249 Fund 250 Fund 251 Fund 252 Fund 253 Fund 260 Fund 262 Fund 266 Fund 267 Fund 270 Praire Oaks Willow Creek Blue Ravine Willow Am River Willow Willow Broadstone 3 ARC No.2 ARC Ranch Silverbrook East Oaks Steeplechase Creek So. Canyon No. Springs Sprgs CFD#11 CFD #12 CFD #13 No. 2 Revenues:

Special Assessment - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest - 822 - 1,436 473 5,305 13 113 2,848 14,015 274 1,829 Other Revenue - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Revenue $ - $ 822 $ - $ 1,436 $ 473 $ 5,305 $ 13 $ 113 $ 2,848 $ 14,015 $ 274 $ 1,829 Expenditures:

Communications - - - - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 28,678 159 6,917 4,620 1,305 19,990 11,082 1,184 6,699 37,604 4,917 37 Contracts 15,326 740 259 258 1,459 1,782 259 259 3,406 17,208 6,646 258 Maintenance 18,919 597 - - 1,192 17,473 53,858 - 26,958 58,603 8,758 170 Supplies - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transfers Out 1,586 76 283 162 174 1,300 859 82 862 4,030 553 95 Total Expenditures $ 64,509 $ 1,572 $ 7,459 $ 5,040 $ 4,130 $ 40,545 $ 66,058 $ 1,525 $ 37,925 $ 117,445 $ 20,874 $ 560 12

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
Fund 271 Fund 275 Fund 278 Fund 281 Fund 282 Fund 283 Fund 284 Fund 285 Fund 288 Fund 289 Fund 291 Fund 293 Residences ARC Blue Ravine Folsom Broadstone Islands Willow Creek Prospect Maint Dist Maint Dist Maint Dist Maint Dist At ARC North #3 Oaks No. 2 Hts #2 #4 CFD #16 Estates #2 Ridge CFD #18 CFD #19 CFD #23 A1 CFD #23 IA3 TOTAL Revenues:

Special Assessment - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest 440 10,997 1,533 2,861 - 6,411 805 373 20,282 7,066 2,217 1,804 93,853 Other Revenue - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Revenue $ 440 $ 10,997 $ 1,533 $ 2,861 $ - $ 6,411 $ 805 $ 373 $ 20,282 $ 7,066 $ 2,217 $ 1,804 $ 93,853 Expenditures:

Communications - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 834 35 - - - 4,067 - 624 66,016 2,687 225 - 297,811 Contracts 1,457 4,292 1,475 1,473 2,204 3,532 3,902 1,760 17,937 230 2,549 - 127,084 Maintenance 1,242 5,681 8,835 17,681 32,531 5,245 5,046 1,222 42,955 2,661 779 - 360,118 Supplies - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transfers Out 152 1,002 215 371 1,594 659 764 161 2,870 355 66 - 23,421 Total Expenditures $ 3,685 $ 11,010 $ 10,525 $ 19,525 $ 36,329 $ 13,503 $ 9,712 $ 3,767 $ 129,778 $ 5,933 $ 3,619 $ - $ 808,434 13

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX E
City of Folsom, California
Combined Water Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
FY 2023 FY 2024 FY24 Forecast
As of As of FY 2023 FY 2024 As of
9/30/2022 9/30/2023 ACTUAL BUDGET 9/30/2023 $ % $ %
OPERATING REVENUES:

Charges For Services 4,996,145 5,395,877 19,763,490 19,278,300 19,278,300 - 100% (13,882,423) 28% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 4,996,145 5,395,877 19,763,490 19,278,300 19,278,300 - 100% (13,882,423) 28% OPERATING EXPENSES:

Salaries 797,906 863,434 3,302,101 3,785,497 3,785,497 - 100% (2,922,063) 23% Benefits 565,760 605,840 2,692,580 2,588,958 2,588,958 - 100% (1,983,118) 23% Utilities 217,573 136,459 985,271 912,500 912,500 - 100% (776,041) 15% Supplies 282,489 273,877 1,401,651 1,706,600 1,706,600 - 100% (1,432,723) 16% Maintenance and Operation 326,287 223,248 822,075 1,139,930 1,139,930 - 100% (916,682) 20% Contractual Services 475,883 300,698 2,079,114 3,932,810 3,932,810 - 100% (3,632,112) 8% Depreciation 1,160,601 - 4,791,075 - - - -
Other Operating Expenses 269,200 338,884 941,038 1,477,014 1,477,014 - 100% (1,138,130) 23% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,095,700 2,742,439 17,014,906 15,543,309 15,543,309 - 100% (12,800,870) 18% OPERATING INCOME 900,446 2,653,438 2,748,584 3,734,991 3,734,991 100% (1,353,261) NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSES):

Impact Fees 220,961 400,274 353,900 252,510 400,274 147,764 159% 147,764 159% Other 19,303 23,602 5,605,847 4,946,515 4,946,515 - 100% (4,922,913) 0% Investment Income 127,136 272,765 654,734 365,000 365,000 - 100% (92,235) 75% Intergovernmental 6,756 - 15,256 - - - -
Proceeds of Financing - - - - - - -
Debt Service Expense (3,000) (3,000) (437,148) (1,842,428) (1,842,428) - 100% 1,839,428 0% Other Reimbursements - - - - - - -
Capital Outlay - Projects (548,347) (490,084) (54,883) (6,517,379) (6,538,540) (21,161) 100% 6,027,295 8%

TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE
(EXPENSE) (177,191) 203,557 6,137,706 (2,795,782) (2,669,179) 126,603 95% 2,999,339 -7%

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS 723,255 2,856,995 8,886,290 939,209 1,065,812

CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:

Transfers In - - 207,763 300,000 300,000 - 100% (300,000) 0% Transfers Out (225,529) (235,348) (1,111,334) (1,239,209) (1,239,209) 126,603 100% 1,003,861 19%

TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS (225,529) (235,348) (903,571) (939,209) (939,209) CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 497,726 2,621,647 7,982,719 - 126,603 NET ASSETS, JULY 1 112,989,848 120,972,567 112,989,848 120,972,567 120,972,567 NET ASSETS 113,487,573 123,594,214 120,972,567 120,972,567 121,099,170 RESTRICTED NET ASSETS (2,730,735) (4,216,188) (1,789,908) (4,216,188) (4,216,188) UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS 110,756,838$ 119,378,026$ 119,182,659$ 116,756,379$ 116,882,982$ * Includes the following funds: Water Impact Fee, Water Operating, Water Capital and Water Meters Prior year includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68

VARIANCE VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget Actual vs Budget
14

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX F
City of Folsom, California
Combined Wastewater Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
FY 2023 FY 2024 FY24 Forecast
As of As of FY 2023 FY 2024 As of
9/30/2022 9/30/2023 ACTUAL BUDGET 9/30/2023 $ % $ %
OPERATING REVENUES:

Charges For Services 3,789,261 3,907,907 11,631,677 11,896,500 11,896,500 - 100% (7,988,593) 33% Prison Services 16,800 16,800 67,200 67,200 67,200 - 100% (50,400) 25% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 3,806,061 3,924,707 11,698,877 11,963,700 11,963,700 - 100% (8,038,993) 33% OPERATING EXPENSES:

Salaries 427,170 464,163 1,738,619 1,979,351 1,979,351 - 100% (1,515,188) 23% Benefits 325,113 334,793 1,495,264 1,435,294 1,435,294 - 100% (1,100,501) 23% Utilities 16,004 9,670 109,956 95,000 95,000 - 100% (85,330) 10% Supplies 89,788 43,266 336,500 535,512 535,512 - 100% (492,246) 8% Maintenance and Operation 48,636 41,826 228,565 298,190 298,190 - 100% (256,364) 14% Contractual Services 102,116 26,849 331,313 833,598 833,598 - 100% (806,749) 3% Depreciation 563,446 - 2,279,803 - - - -
Other Operating Expenses 69,225 67,764 344,557 484,476 484,476 - 100% (416,712) 14% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,641,499 988,331 6,864,577 5,661,421 5,661,421 - 100% (4,673,090) 17% OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 2,164,562 2,936,376 4,834,300 6,302,279 6,302,279 100% NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSES): (653,168)
Impact Fees 131,352 42,346 219,485 79,950 79,950 - 100% (37,604) 53.0% Investment Income 104,207 250,045 426,409 215,000 254,672 39,672 118% 35,045 116% Other 3,112 45,659 3,499,935 1,313,447 1,313,447 - 100% (1,267,788) 3% Debt Service - - (486) - - - -
Capital Outlay - Projects (231,701) (868,063) 39,460 (4,582,140) (4,582,140) - 100% 3,714,077 19%

TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE
(EXPENSE) 6,971 (530,013) 4,184,803 (2,973,743) (2,934,071) 39,672 99% 2,443,730 18%

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS 2,171,533 2,406,363 9,019,103 3,328,536 3,368,208 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:

Transfers In - - 101,100 - - - -
Transfers Out (180,951) (176,450) (725,258) (743,616) (743,616) - 0% (567,166) 31%

TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS (180,951) (176,450) (624,158) (743,616) (743,616) CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 1,990,583 2,229,913 8,394,945 2,584,920 2,624,592 NET ASSETS, JULY 1 70,888,708 79,283,653 70,888,708 79,283,653 79,283,653 NET ASSETS 72,879,290 81,513,565 79,283,653 81,868,573 81,908,245 RESTRICTED NET ASSETS (3,915,229) (272,010) (11,416,040) (272,010) (272,010) UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS 68,964,062$ 81,241,555$ 67,867,613$ 81,596,562$ 81,636,234$ * Includes the following funds: Sewer Operating and Sewer Capital Prior year includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68

VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget

VARIANCE
Actual vs Budget
15

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

APPENDIX G
City of Folsom, California
Combined Solid Waste Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
FY 2023 FY 2024 FY24 Forecast
As of As of FY 2023 FY 2024 As of
9/30/2022 9/30/2023 ACTUAL BUDGET 9/30/2023 $ % $ %
OPERATING REVENUES:

Charges For Services 7,519,212 8,605,297 23,949,088 25,973,000 25,973,000 - 100% (17,367,703) 33% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 7,519,212 8,605,297 23,949,088 25,973,000 25,973,000 - 100% (17,367,703) 33% OPERATING EXPENSES:

Salaries 903,943 1,053,600 3,912,798 4,731,876 4,731,876 - 100% (3,678,276) 22% Benefits 730,535 808,475 3,358,053 3,512,580 3,512,580 - 100% (2,704,105) 23% Utilities 10,601 9,909 46,542 48,500 48,500 - 100% (38,591) 20% Supplies 280,994 87,246 1,924,591 2,008,868 2,008,868 - 100% (1,921,622) 4% Maintenance and Operation 359,569 78,662 1,284,290 944,533 944,533 - 100% (865,871) 8% Contractual Services 757,346 790,160 5,267,427 5,766,084 5,766,084 - 100% (4,975,924) 14% Depreciation 211,436 - 1,037,047 - - - -
Other Operating Expenses 178,099 180,714 707,601 934,798 934,798 - 100% (754,084) 19% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 3,432,524 3,008,768 17,538,349 17,947,239 17,947,239 - 100% (14,938,471) 17% OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 4,086,688 5,596,529 6,410,739 8,025,761 8,025,761 NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSE): (423,756)
Impact Fees 168,677 180,757 573,568 526,066 526,066 - 100.0% (345,309) 34% Investment Income 63,079 176,851 242,789 138,000 179,298 41,298 130% 38,851 128% Intergovernmental Revenues - - 121,546 120,415 120,415 - 100% (120,415) 0% Other 110,021 88,838 311,488 4,522,250 4,522,250 - 100% (4,433,412) 2% Debt Service-Expense - - (2,367) - - - -
Capital Outlay - (10,822) 19,984 (3,286,076) (3,286,076) - 100% 3,275,254 0% TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE 341,778 435,624 1,267,008 2,020,655 2,061,953 41,298 102% (1,585,031) 22% (EXPENSE)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS 4,428,466 6,032,154 7,677,747 10,046,416 10,087,714 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:

Transfers In - - - - - - -
Transfers Out (409,409) (401,525) (1,639,216) (1,663,916) (1,663,916) - 0% 1,262,391 -32%

TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS (409,409) (401,525) (1,639,216) (1,663,916) (1,663,916) CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 4,019,057 5,630,629 6,038,531 8,382,500 8,423,798 NET ASSETS, JULY 1 1,003,668 7,042,199 1,003,668 7,042,199 7,042,199 NET ASSETS 5,022,725 12,672,827 7,042,199 15,424,699 15,465,997 RESTRICTED NET ASSETS - (181,411) (7,214,754) (181,411) (181,411) UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS 5,022,725$ 12,491,417$ (172,556)$ 15,243,288$ 15,284,586$ * Includes the following funds: Solid Waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, and Solid Waste Plan Area Capital Prior year includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68 Forecast vs Budget

VARIANCE VARIANCE
Actual vs Budget
16

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing.

11/14/2023 Item No.2.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1339 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 6 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)
FROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the second reading and move to adopt the following ordinance:

Ordinance No. 1339 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 6 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan (“PFFP”), approved by the City Council on January 28, 2014, via Resolution 9298, is an $877 million plan that describes the backbone infrastructure and facility requirements, presents a comprehensive financing strategy, and sets forth the estimated time horizon for the development of the Folsom Plan Area (“FPA”).

The City Council previously approved the Resolution of Formation (Resolution No. 10435) on May 26, 2020 to form Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (“CFD No. 23”), designate Improvement Area No. 6, authorize a special tax to finance the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities and certain public services, authorize the issuance of

11/14/2023 Item No.3.
2 debt to finance the public facilities, and establish the appropriations limit and maximum bonded indebtedness for Improvement Area No. 6.

Further, the City Council previously approved the Resolution of Change (Resolution No. 10894) on July 26, 2022, to approve an amendment to remove the maximum facilities special tax rates from the multi-family high density property land use and the non-residential property land use.

The landowners within Improvement Area No. 6 have requested to further amend the Amended Rate and Method of Apportionment to remove the maximum facilities special tax rate from the multi-family medium density property land use. This amendment would remove the maximum facilities special tax rate from all remaining taxable property within Improvement Area No. 6.

There are no proposed changes to the maximum services special tax rates.

On September 12, 2023, this City Council considered the amendment to the Rate and Method of Apportionment for Improvement Area No. 6 by passage of Resolution No. 11102.

A Public Hearing and landowner election was conducted October 24, 2023. At that time, the following resolutions were approved by the Council:

 Resolution No. 11120 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Calling a Special Mailed-Ballot Election Related to Change Proceedings for Improvement Area No. 6 within City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch)
 Resolution No. 11121 – A Resolution of Change of the City Council of the City of Folsom Relating to Improvement Area No. 6 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch)
The results of the landowner election was 29 votes in favor of the ballot measure and zero opposed.

POLICY / RULE
Chapter 5 of the Folsom Plan Area Public Facilities Financing Plan authorizes the formation of CFDs to finance the construction, acquisition, and servicing of FPA backbone infrastructure and public facilities
Section 2.5.3 of the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement authorizes the formation of infrastructure CFDs
Resolution No. 9282 – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982

11/14/2023 Item No.3.
3 ANALYSIS
CFD No. 23 is structured as an extended-term CFD and will provide the necessary funding to help fund all or a portion of the project’s share of PFFP backbone infrastructure and facilities, including related environmental mitigation obligations. The PFFP backbone infrastructure and facilities will be financed using both bond proceeds and PAYGO special tax revenues. The extended-term CFD structure is proposed to help to meet the challenge of high-cost infrastructure and facilities while also aligning the timing of future funding availability with the need for such funding.

The additional amendment to the Amended Rate and Method of Apportionment for Improvement Area No. 6 removes the maximum facilities special tax rate from the multifamily medium density property land use. This amendment removes the maximum facilities special tax rate from all remaining taxable property within Improvement Area No. 6. There are no proposed changes to the maximum services special tax rates. A comparison of the previously amended CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 6 Rate and Method of Apportionment and the changes proposed within this Amended CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 6 Rate and Method of Apportionment is included in Attachment 2. There is no single-family detached property planned for development within Improvement Area No. 6.

The special tax revenue generated from taxable parcels within Improvement Area No. 6 will include a special tax to fund services only. The amended Fiscal Year 2023/24 maximum facilities special tax rates and maximum services special tax rates, for each land use category, are provided in the table below:

Land Use Category
FY 2023/24
Maximum
Facilities
Special Tax
Rate
FY 2023/24
Maximum
Services
Special Tax
Rate Per
Single-Family Detached Property - SF/SFHD
Zoning $0 $0 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
Zoning 0 0 Unit
MMD Multi-Family Attached Property 0 332 Acre
MHD Multi-Family Attached Property 0 332 Acre
Non-Residential Property 0 0 Acre
The facilities special tax will no longer be levied and collected. The services special tax can be levied and collected in perpetuity for Improvement Area No. 6. Each fiscal year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2024/25, the maximum services special tax rate will be increased by the June annualized percentage change of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area, not to exceed 4%.

11/14/2023 Item No.3.
4 Ordinance 1339 authorizes the special tax to be levied on CFD No. 23 Improvement Area No. 6 for Fiscal Year 2023/24 and all subsequent years, and was introduced on October 24, 2023.

No changes have been made to the ordinance since the first reading.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no direct General Fund impact on the City of Folsom. The Improvement Area No. 6 amendment and expenses are solely the responsibility of Improvement Area No. 6. The General Fund is not impacted by the Improvement Area No. 6 Amended Rate and Method of Apportionment.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Folsom Plan Area Backbone Infrastructure Project were previously prepared for, and adopted by the City Council on February 24, 2015, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(c), the term “project” does not mean each separate governmental approval for an approved activity which may be subject to several discretionary approvals by governmental agencies. Additionally, the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment is not defined as a “project” under CEQA. CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) and 15061(b)(3).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 1339 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 6 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)
Submitted,
Stacey Tamagni
Finance Director

11/14/2023 Item No.3.

Ordinance No. 1339

ORDINANCE NO. 1339

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 AND FOLLOWING FISCAL YEARS SOLELY WITHIN AND RELATING TO IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 6 WITHIN THE CITY OF FOLSOM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 23 (FOLSOM RANCH)
The City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California ordains as follows:

SECTION 1 PURPOSE
The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby finds, determines and declares based on the record before it that:

1. The City is authorized to establish a community facilities district pursuant to the terms of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 53311 (the “Act”); and

2. Pursuant to Section 53350 of the Act, the City is authorized to designate improvement areas within the community facilities district; and

3. Pursuant to Government Code section 53340 and Resolution No. 10435, adopted by the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Folsom (the “City”) on May 26, 2020 (the “Resolution of Formation”), the City Council formed its Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (the “Community Facilities District”) and a rate and method of apportionment of the special tax (as amended, the “Special Tax”) for Improvement Area No. 6 established therein was approved by an election of the qualified electors within the Community Facilities District on such date; and

4. Pursuant to Government Code section 53340 and Resolution No. 10894, adopted by the City Council on July 26, 2022 (the “2022 Resolution of Change”), an amended rate and method of apportionment of the special tax for Improvement Area No. 6 (the “2022 RMA”) was approved by an election of the qualified electors within the Community Facilities District on such date;

4. Pursuant to Resolution No. 11102, adopted by the City Council on September 12, 2023 (the “2023 Resolution of Consideration”) and Resolution No. 11121 adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2023 (the “2023 Resolution of Change” and, collectively with the Resolution of Formation and the 2023 Resolution of Consideration, the “Resolutions”), the City Council approved an Amended Rate and Method of Apportionment for City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 6 (the “2023 Amended Rate and Method”), which changes were approved by an election of the qualified electors within the Community Facilities District on such date; and

5. The City Council desires to levy and impose the Special Tax and to take other related actions.

11/14/2023 Item No.3.

Ordinance No. 1339

SECTION 2

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
RESOLVES:

1. The recitals set forth in Section 1 are true and correct.

2. A special tax is hereby levied on all Taxable Property (as defined in the 2023 Amended Rate and Method) within Improvement Area No. 6 for the 2023-24 fiscal year and for all subsequent fiscal years in the amount of the maximum authorized tax, provided that this amount may be adjusted annually, subject to the maximum authorized special tax limit, by resolution of the City Council.

3. The Finance Director of the City of Folsom or designee thereof (the “CFD Administrator”) is authorized and directed, to determine each year, without further action of the City Council, the Special Tax, to prepare the annual Special Tax roll in the amount of the Special Tax in accordance with the related exhibit and, without further action of the City Council, to provide all necessary and appropriate information to the Sacramento County Auditor-Controller’s Office (the “County”) in proper form, and in proper time, necessary to effect the correct and timely billing and collection of the Special Tax on the secured property tax roll of the County; provided, that as provided in the Resolutions and Section 53340 of the California Government Code, the City has reserved the right to utilize any method of collecting the Special Tax which it shall, from time to time, determine to be in the best interests of the City of Folsom (the “City”), including but not limited to, direct billing by the City to the property owners and supplemental billing.

4. The appropriate officers and agents of the City are authorized to make adjustments to the Special Tax roll prior to the final posting of the Special Tax to the County tax roll each fiscal year, as may be necessary to achieve a correct match of the Special Tax levy with the assessor’s parcel numbers finally utilized by the County in sending out property tax bills.

5. The City agrees that, in the event the Special Tax for the Improvement Area is collected on the secured tax roll of the County, the County may deduct its reasonable and agreed charges for collecting the Special Tax from the amounts collected, prior to remitting the Special Tax collections to the City.

6. Taxpayers who have requested changes or corrections of the Special Tax pursuant to Section I of the 2023 Amended Rate and Method and who are not satisfied with the decision of the CFD Administrator (whether the CFD Administrator disagrees with the taxpayer or concludes that the City is not authorized to consider the change requested), may appeal to the City Council. The appeal must be in writing, fully explain the grounds of appeal and must be based solely on the correction of mistakes in the levy based upon the status of the property, and no other appeals will be allowed. The CFD Administrator shall schedule the appeal for consideration within a reasonable time at a City Council meeting.

11/14/2023 Item No.3.

Ordinance No. 1339

SECTION 3 SEVERABILITY
If for any cause any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance, and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels, shall not be affected.

SECTION 4 EFFECTIVE DATE; EFFECT ON ORDINANCE NO. 1330
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force as a tax measure thirty (30) days following its second reading and adoption at a meeting of the City Council; and before the expiration of twenty (20) days after its passage the same shall be published, with the names of the members voting for and against the same, at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the District.

Ordinance No. 1330 adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2022, shall be superseded, solely with respect to Improvement Area No. 6, to the extent it is inconsistent with this ordinance, upon the date that this ordinance takes effect, as described in the immediately preceding paragraph.
* * *

11/14/2023 Item No.3.

Ordinance No. 1339

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on October 24, 2023 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on November 14, 2023.

On a motion by ______________, second by ______________, the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this 14th day of November, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.3.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11123 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. for Economic
Development Consulting Services
FROM: City Manager's Office

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 11123 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. for Economic Development Consulting Services.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City Council unanimously approved the City Manager's Proposed FY 2023-24 Budget at its regular meeting on May 23, 2023. To support economic growth and development within the city, the City Council recognizes the importance of engaging external expertise. A consensus of the City Council requested that up to $100,000 be dedicated to an economic development consultant contract. The City Council further requested that the City Manager place an item on a future City Council agenda to allow the City Council to provide direction about an economic development consultant. On June 27, 2023, the City Manager recommended that the City Council provide direction on the scope of work and goals sought for the economic development consultant contract as part of the approved FY 2023-24 Budget. Following City Council direction and approval, City staff prepared a Request for Proposals (RFP) for economic development consulting services.

POLICY / RULE
Pursuant to Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code, professional services, as defined in Section 2.36.030, costing $70,952 dollars or greater shall be contracted for by the City Council.

In accordance with Section 2.36.110(G) of the Folsom Municipal Code, the award of a negotiated bid proposal shall be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to be the most

11/14/2023 Item No.4.
2 advantageous to the City, taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposals.

ANALYSIS
The selected consultant will work closely with the City Council, City Manager, and City staff to develop a three-year economic development action plan, assess development projects, conduct a comparative analysis, perform a void analysis, and provide ongoing support as a third-party economic development resource.

Following City Council direction and approval, City staff prepared a Request for Proposals (RFP) for economic development consulting services. The purpose of the RFP was to invite submissions from economic development consultants who could assist in formulating and implementing a comprehensive economic development strategy. An RFP was issued on August 9, 2023, and the proposal submission deadline was Friday, September 15, 2023, at 2 p.m. To ensure a vast pool of talent, the RFP was disseminated both to a targeted list of economic development consultants and to a database comprising approximately 100 consultants statewide.

This statewide outreach was facilitated in collaboration with the California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED).

To support a comprehensive and well-informed evaluation, an Economic Development Consultant Proposal Review Committee evaluated proposals and recommended the most suitable economic development consultant candidate. Committee Members included Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, Council Member Anna Rohrbough, City Manager Elaine Andersen, Community Development Director Pam Johns, Communications Director Christine Brainerd, Choose Folsom President and CEO Joe Gagliardi, and City of Elk Grove Economic Development Program Manager Luis Aguilar.

The City of Folsom received eight proposals from the following firms:
 Alex Greenwood Group
 HdL ECONSolutions
 Kosmont & Associates, Inc.
 LSI Business Development
 Retail Strategies
 RSG, Inc.
 The Natelson Dale Group
 Westwood Economics and Planning Associates LLC
The Economic Development Consultant Selection Committee evaluated the proposals based on the following criteria:
 Consultant's qualifications and relevant experience. (25%)  Understanding of the project's scope and goals. (25%)  Methodology and approach proposed. (25%)
 Availability of resources, proposed timeline, and cost. (25%)

11/14/2023 Item No.4.
3 The results of the evaluation are indicated below. Kosmont & Associates, Inc. received the highest score and was determined the most qualified to assist in the formulation and implementation of a comprehensive economic development strategy. Following the proposal evaluation, the Economic Development Consultant Proposal Review Committee conducted an interview with the Kosmont & Associates, Inc. project team.

Reviewer Kosmont RSG
Natelson
Dale
Group
Alex
Greenwood HDL
Retail
Strategies LSI Westwood
1 100 68 68 80 76 72 64 64
2 100 80 75 80 75 80 80 80
3 92 88 83 72 70 45 50 78
4 95 85 92 85 90 80 85 92
5 96 59 78 90 80 65 90 83
6 88 86 87 93 98 40 85 94
7 96 89 89 87 81 70 77 94
Total
Score 667 555 572 587 570 452 531 585

FINANCIAL IMPACT
$100,000 is budgeted and available in FY 2023-24 in the General Fund (Fund 010) for an economic development consultant contract. The contract with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. would be authorized for a not to exceed amount of $99,845.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not a “project” under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and is otherwise exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11123 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. for Economic Development Consulting Services
Submitted,
Christine Brainerd, Acting Assistant City Manager/Communications Director

11/14/2023 Item No.4.

Resolution No. 11123

RESOLUTION NO. 11123

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council unanimously approved the City Manager's Proposed FY 2023-24 Budget at its regular meeting on May 23, 2023; and WHEREAS, to support economic growth and development within the city, the City Council recognizes the importance of engaging external expertise; and WHEREAS, a consensus of the City Council requested that up to $100,000 be dedicated to an economic development consultant contract; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023, the City Council provided City staff direction on the scope of work and goals sought for the economic development consultant contract as part of the approved FY 2023-24 Budget; and
WHEREAS, City staff prepared and issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for economic development consulting services to invite submissions from economic development consultants who can assist in formulating and implementing a comprehensive economic development strategy; and
WHEREAS, eight economic development consulting services proposals were received; and
WHEREAS, to ensure a comprehensive and well-informed evaluation, an Economic Development Consultant Proposal Review Committee evaluated the proposals and recommended the most suitable economic development consultant candidate; and WHEREAS, Kosmont & Associates, Inc. received the highest score and was determined the most qualified to assist in the formulation and implementation of a comprehensive economic development strategy; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the FY 2023-24 General Fund budget; and
WHEREAS, the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. for Economic Development Consulting Services.

11/14/2023 Item No.4.

Resolution No. 11123

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
___________________________________
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.4.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing.

11/14/2023 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11124 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with OpenGov, Inc. for
Budgeting and Planning Software
FROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Finance Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11124 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with OpenGov, Inc. for Budgeting and Planning Software.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom (City) has historically used Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word to develop its annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Plan. This manual process is time consuming and error prone with reliance on inputting data from the financial system, creating links between worksheets, entering formulas, and entering static data. The lack of modern tools results in processes which are inherently difficult to engage departments outside of Finance, maintain version control, track progressions of budget through steps in the process, and efficiently create budget reporting documents and presentations. A modern budget process requires a comprehensive software solution that provides planning, forecasting, process management, budget book development, transparency, reporting and analytics, and is well suited to engage all City departments in the budget process. The OpenGov software meets these criteria and can integrate with the City’s financial system, Finance Enterprise. This integration creates assurances that accurate financial data for current and prior years is being used in the budget development process.

11/14/2023 Item No.5.
2 POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

Section 2.36.140, Sole Source Procurement of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that the requesting department shall conduct a survey of available sources to determine whether there is only one source for the required supply, equipment, service or construction item, and after review of this request by the purchasing agent and the finance director and approved by the city manager, a contract shall be awarded without competition.

ANALYSIS
Finance Department staff met with and reviewed several budgeting software services. After a preliminary review of the other platforms, OpenGov’s solution was the most aligned with the City’s current budgeting practices and processes. Finance Department staff further vetted OpenGov’s system by participating in a few demonstrations that drilled into its core functionality. For an additional measure of objectivity, Finance Department staff conferred with a neighboring city operating OpenGov Budget and Planning software to hear their testimonial and experience using the platform.

OpenGov best meets the needs of the City in the areas of operating budget preparation, personnel budgeting/forecasting, financial reporting, data management, dashboard analytics, and online budget book. Moreover, it is critical for the solution to synchronize directly to the City’s financial system, providing timely and accurate access to current financial data.

OpenGov offers a full-featured, cloud-based, budgeting software designed for public agencies. The centralized platform will help unify the end-to-end budgeting process from the initial stages of planning and personnel forecasting through final publication, while enabling improved collaboration throughout the process. As an integrated budgeting and planning solution, it will allow staff to develop their department budgets in a more streamlined, systematic, and repeatable way and review against real-time financial information from the City’s financial system. This will dramatically improve a labor-intensive step within the current process whereby numerous Excel spreadsheets of department budget submissions are manually organized and consolidated. With the efficiency gained in OpenGov, staff will be able to divert more time to the invaluable analysis and evaluation of programs, policies, and operations. Additionally, the software includes an online budget book and dashboarding capabilities to present financial data in graphical/visual format, as well as transparency tools to help tie together and organize the City’s multi-department budget according to different strategic initiatives/priorities. These publication capabilities will also allow the City to continue producing the annual budget book in pdf format.

If the contract is approved, staff anticipates a project kickoff in December 2023. This will allow adequate time to set up and configure the system per City specifications so that it can be used to prepare the FY 2024-25 Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Plan.

11/14/2023 Item No.5.
3 The total cost of $328,174.75 over the forty-three-month term is detailed below:

Billing Date Annual Software Fee One-Time Implementation December 1, 2023 $42,883.75 $53,535.00
July 1, 2024 $73,515.00 -
July 1, 2025 $77,191.00 -
July 1, 2026 $81,050.00 -
Total $274,639.75 $53,535.00
The service is recommended as a sole source procurement as there are no other known budgeting software service providers that meet or exceed the City’s budgeting process goals and integrate with the City’s financial system, Finance Enterprise.

The proposed action is consistent with the City Council’s Strategic Plan Goal to initiate technology solutions to streamline organization and improve efficiency and create new ways for the public to access information and records for increased transparency.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City Council approved as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget $60,000 in the Finance Department’s budget in the General Fund (Fund 010) for budgeting software.

Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the General Fund Non-Departmental division (Fund 010) in Fiscal Year 2023-24 to cover the remaining Fiscal Year 2023-24 cost of $36,418.75 needed for Year 1 of the project. Budget appropriations for the remainder of the contract will need to be allocated in future budget years. The Finance Department recommends the cost of this contract be awarded to OpenGov, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $328,174.75.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not Applicable.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11124 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with OpenGov, Inc. for Budget and Planning Software.

Submitted,

Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director

11/14/2023 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 11124

RESOLUTION NO. 11124

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH OPENGOV, INC. FOR BUDGETING AND PLANNING

SOFTWARE
WHEREAS, the City seeks to modernize the budget process and implement a budgeting and planning software solution; and
WHEREAS, OpenGov, Inc. Budgeting and Planning software meets the need for an effective and efficient budgeting and reporting software solution; and WHEREAS, this is a sole source procurement, as no other known budgeting service providers meet or exceed the City’s budgeting process and integrates with the City’s financial system, Finance Enterprise; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council approved, as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget, $60,000 in the Finance Department’s budget in the General Fund (Fund 010) for budgeting software, and sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the General Fund Non-Departmental division (Fund 010) in Fiscal Year 2023-24 to cover the remaining Fiscal Year 2023-24 cost in the amount of $36,418.75; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with OpenGov, Inc. for Budgeting and Planning Software for an amount not to exceed $328,174.75.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
___________________________________
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.5.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11125 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with National Auto Fleet Group for Four Fire Department Dodge Ram Pickup Trucks FROM: Fire Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Fire Department recommends that the City Council move and adopt Resolution No. 11125 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with National Auto Fleet Group for Four Fire Department Dodge Ram Pickup Trucks

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Fire Department currently utilizes seven various staff vehicles that are all older than 15 years old and have extensively high mileage. The current staff vehicle fleet is unreliable and requires replacement. Rising maintenance expenses to the staff vehicle fleet are outpacing replacement costs.

The Fire Department staff vehicle replacement purchase is for four Dodge Ram pickup trucks which will be utilized by the fire department for emergency responses and non-emergency duties including logistical support, training, equipment movement, and state-wide overhead resource needs. This purchase has been approved in the FY 2023-24 Fire Department Budget. These trucks will take approximately five months to upfit with emergency response equipment with an expected delivery date of April 2024. The pickup trucks will replace four current staff vehicles ranging from 15-20 years old, all with more than 100,000 miles.

Staff is recommending that the City enter into a cooperative purchase agreement with National Auto Fleet Group of Watsonville, CA using Sourcewell Contract 091521-NAF to purchase four Dodge Ram staff trucks. The total price to purchase these Dodge Ram pickup trucks is $328,373.57.

11/14/2023 Item No.6.
2 POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

Section 2.36.170, Cooperative Purchasing of the Folsom Municipal Code, describes the procedures to enter into a cooperative purchase agreement with another public agency for the procurement of supplies, equipment, or service.

ANALYSIS
The Fire Department currently uses seven staff vehicles that all range in age from 15-20 years old.

The current staff vehicle fleet is becoming less reliable as we have extended their expected service life. Rising costs to maintain this aging fleet have escalated each year.

The Fire Department has conducted extensive research and determined that this purchase through the Sourcewell contract would provide the City with a reliable product at the best price.

Sourcewell contracts provided through Nation Auto Fleet Group have assisted local government members nationally in reducing competitive bid costs associated with procuring products and services. There are several California municipalities who participate in the Sourcewell contracts, including the Cities of Auburn, Roseville, Rancho Cordova, Sacramento, Vacaville, and Woodland. The County of Sacramento and the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District are also participants in the program.

National Auto Fleet Group has been awarded a contract through Sourcewell to supply vehicles on behalf of Dodge manufacturing. The City will save an additional 5% over the lowest bid price that National Auto Fleet Group can offer by utilizing Sourcewell.

This purchase would replace four of the oldest vehicles in the staff vehicle inventory. These trucks will be regular Dodge trucks, each equipped with unique equipment to fit the Fire Department’s need. The trucks will be utilized to serve the department in administrative and logistical functions.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The contract with National Auto Fleet Group for four Dodge Ram trucks is $328,373.57 with a 5% contingency ($16,418.68) for a total amount not to exceed $344,792.25.

Four (4) Dodge Ram pickup trucks (Sourcewell contract 091521-NAF) $301,485.57 Transportation and handling fee $3,237.00
Total Vehicle Cost $304,722.57
Sales Tax @ 7.75% $23,616.00
California Tire Fee $35.00
Total Purchase $328,373.57
5% Contingency $16,418.68

11/14/2023 Item No.6.
3 The approved Fiscal Year 2023-24 Fire Department Budget in the General Fund (Fund 010) includes funds for the purchase of four staff vehicles. This payment will be made during Fiscal Year 2023-24 upon delivery of the four vehicles.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This report concerns administrative activities that do not constitute a “project” as defined by section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and is otherwise exempt pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(2).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11125 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with National Auto Fleet Group for Four Fire Department Dodge Ram Pickup Trucks
Submitted,

Ken Cusano, FIRE CHIEF

11/14/2023 Item No.6.

Resolution No. 11125

RESOLUTION NO. 11125

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP FOR FOUR

FIRE DEPARTMENT DODGE RAM PICKUP TRUCKS
WHEREAS, the Fire Department staff has completed extensive research and validated the need to acquire four Dodge staff trucks to replace aging staff vehicles; and WHEREAS, staff reviewed and recommended participation in a Sourcewell contract utilizing National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of four Dodge staff trucks to ensure fiscal responsibility; and
WHEREAS, the purchase of four trucks is $328,373.57 and a 5% contingency in the amount of $16,418.68 for a total amount of $344,792.25; and WHEREAS, the purchase of four staff trucks was budgeted and funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Fire Department Budget in the General Fund (010); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a purchase agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, with National Auto Fleet Group, to acquire four Dodge staff trucks in the total amount not to exceed $344,792.25.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
___________________________________
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11126 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order with B&M
Builders, Inc. for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project, Project No. PW2102 and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11126 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order with B&M Builders, Inc. for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project, Project No.

PW2102 and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project was an element of the Folsom Gateway and Median Project. The Folsom Gateway and Median Project design was completed and approved in December 2014. The project was put on hold due to drought conditions and uncertainty of improvements needed for the Folsom Plan Area that might conflict with the Gateway and Median Project improvements. State funding previously awarded by the Sacramento Transportation Authority and California Transportation Commission in the amount of $123,000 for the East Bidwell Widening Project was reallocated to the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project by City Council Resolution No. 10629, authorizing an agreement with Caltrans for Project Supplement Agreement No. 0000000X30. The Agreement was fully executed on September 24, 2021, and assigned Caltrans Project No. STPL 5288(048).

The improvements to the Iron Point Median between Willard Drive and the west entrance to Intel include the completion of curbs and landscaping for the two medians. Native oak trees and drought tolerant plants have been used for landscaping.

11/14/2023 Item No.7.
2 During the course of construction, several items of work required additional funding, such as repairs to the solar irrigation controller that was moved from Folsom Boulevard, additional curb and curb reinforcement, water service, and additional paving and grading. The additional work exceeded the 10% contingency by $24,000, bringing the project contingency 14%.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
Public Works staff prepared the bid package, and the project was publicly advertised on April 7, 2022. On May 5, 2022, the Public Works Department received the following bids:

1. B&M Builders, Inc. $576,105.50

2. Dutch Construction, Inc. $625,439.00

3. Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. $687,496.00 B&M Builders, Inc. was the lowest, responsible, responsive bidder. On May 24, 2022, City Council passed and adopted Resolution 10851, authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction agreement with B&M Builders, Inc. for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project was included in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget for $410,000 utilizing Transportation Improvement Funds (Fund 446). The additional amount needed for the contract was appropriated from Measure A Fund (Fund 276), Facilities Augmentation Fund (Fund 537), and SB-1 LPP funds that replaced some of the Transportation Improvement Funds (Fund 446), which required a 100% match of local funds as shown below:

SB-1 LPP $123,000
Local Match (Fund 446) $123,000
Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) $164,000
Measure A (Fund 276) $146,000
Facilities Augmentation Fund (Fund 537) $ 88,000
Total Project Funding $644,000
The contract change order covers the additional cost of several items of work that were discovered during construction that exceeded the 10% project contingency by $24,000. Staff is requesting that the additional appropriation of $24,000 be funded from Measure A (Fund 276), for a total project budget of $668,000.

11/14/2023 Item No.7.
3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is an improvement of existing infrastructure and has been determined to be Categorically Exempt by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15304 (a) (b) (f).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11126 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order with B&M Builders, Inc. for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project, Project No. PW2102 and Appropriation of Funds
Submitted,

Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

11/14/2023 Item No.7.

Resolution No. 11126

RESOLUTION NO. 11126

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER WITH B&M BUILDERS, INC. FOR THE IRON POINT ROAD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO. PW2102 AND

APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to make improvements to existing medians on Iron Point Road; and
WHEREAS, the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project is included in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget; and
WHEREAS, the project was publicly advertised on April 7, 2022, and on May 5, 2022, three bids were received, with B&M Builders, Inc. being the lowest, responsible, responsive bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom is programmed to receive Senate Bill 1 funding and is eligible for state reimbursement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has previously executed Master Agreement No. 00461S for State-Funded Projects with the State of California Department of Transportation in order to receive the funding and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has executed a Program Supplement for State Project No. 5288(048), City Project No. PW2102 upon approval at the June California Transportation Commission Meeting; and
WHEREAS, the matching funds for Senate Bill 1 LPP Funding will utilize Transportation Improvement Funds (Fund 446) at a 1 to 1 ratio for the required local match and WHEREAS, state reimbursements received will be deposited to the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and
WHEREAS, an additional appropriation is required for the project in the amount of $24,000; and
WHEREAS, staff is requesting the additional appropriation be added to the Measure A Fund (Fund 276) for a total project budget of $668,000; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for $24,000 with B&M Builders, Inc. for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project, Project No. PW2102.

11/14/2023 Item No.7.

Resolution No. 11126

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to make the following appropriations for the Iron Point Road Median Improvement Project, Project No. PW2102:

1. $24,000 from Measure A Fund (Fund 276)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2023 by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
___________________________________
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.7.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing.

11/14/2023 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11127 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to
Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288S21 for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project
FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11127 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288S21 for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Riley Street Sidewalk Project proposes increasing pedestrian access, safety, and connectivity on Riley Street between Sutter Street and East Bidwell Street. There are currently significant gaps in the pedestrian infrastructure along this corridor. With the pedestrian route adjacent to Sutter Middle School, it is important that the required Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance and safety measures are up to current standards. The project will provide a pedestrian gateway into the Historic District and adjacent residential and commercial areas.

The City contracted with REY Engineers in 2020 to perform a Project Feasibility Study to help identify project options, budgets, and constraints. Utilizing the project options, the Public Works Department applied for four Active Transportation Program grants; however, the project was not selected for funding.

11/14/2023 Item No.8.
2 In February 2022, Congressman Bera’s office requested a call for projects for potential federal funding. Public Works staff submitted a request for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project and the project was ultimately chosen to receive $4 million in project funding.

Caltrans requires a Program Supplement Agreement to the Administering Agency–State Agreement for projects administered through Caltrans. Before invoicing Caltrans for reimbursable costs, the city must return the fully executed Program Supplement Agreements.

Once the Program Supplement Agreement is executed, staff will advertise a Request for Proposals for the Preliminary Engineering phase of the project design. This phase includes preparing plans, specifications, and estimates, as well as any necessary right of way, utility relocation, and environmental design. The contract for those professional services will be presented to City Council for consideration at a future meeting.

POLICY / RULE
Caltrans requires that the executed Program Supplement Agreement is accompanied by a certified Resolution that clearly identifies the representative who is authorized to sign on the Agency’s behalf.

ANALYSIS
The City of Folsom is required to execute the Program Supplement Agreement with Caltrans Local Assistance before invoicing Caltrans for any reimbursable costs.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The city was awarded $4,000,000 for this project. The city is required to provide a 11.47% local match towards the $4,518,242 total project cost, in the amount of $518,242.40. Matching Funds for this project are available in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
As part of the Preliminary Engineering phase of this project, an analysis will be performed to determine compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11127 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288S21 for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project

11/14/2023 Item No.8.
3 Submitted,

Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

11/14/2023 Item No.8.

Resolution No. 11127

RESOLUTION NO. 11127

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT 03-5288S21 FOR THE RILEY STREET SIDEWALK PROJECT WHEREAS, the Public Works Department responded to a call for projects from Congressman Bera’s office for Congressionally Directed Spending funds for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project; and
WHEREAS, the project was selected to receive $4 million in Congressionally Directed Spending funds; and
WHEREAS, the executed Supplement Agreement must be returned to Caltrans before invoicing for any reimbursable expenses; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans requires that the signed Program Supplement Agreement is accompanied by a certified Resolution that clearly identifies the representative who is authorized to sign on the Agency’s behalf; and
WHEREAS, the local matching funds required are 11.47% of received federal funds, or $518,242.40, and funds are available in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288S21 for the Riley Street Sidewalk Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
____________________________________
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.8.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE: 11/14/2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11128 – A Resolution Adopting the City of Folsom Title VI Implementation Plan
FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11128 – A Resolution Adopting the City of Folsom Title VI Implementation Plan.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In 1964, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act was created, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. Similar statutes were later created that extend discrimination protections for sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law.

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has been tasked with ensuring that local agencies that receive federal funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) comply with these statutes. To ensure compliance, Caltrans and FHWA require that all local agencies receiving federal funding create Title VI Implementation Plans.

POLICY / RULE
Caltrans requires that local agencies that receive federal funds from the FHWA comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act through the creation of a Title VI Implementation Plan.

ANALYSIS
The FHWA has developed the following Title VI requirements for local agencies:

11/14/2023 Item No.9.
2 1. Title VI Coordinator. The local agency shall designate a Title VI Coordinator who has a responsible position in the organization and easy access to the head of the agency.

2. Title VI Nondiscrimination Statement. The local public agency must develop a Title VI policy statement for signature by the head of the agency.

3. Dissemination of Title VI Information. The local agency shall develop Title VI information for dissemination to the general public and, where appropriate, in languages other than English.

4. Title VI Assurances in Contract Documents and Agreements. The local agency federal-aid contract documents and agreements shall incorporate Title VI assurances.

5. Title VI Training for Local Agency Staff. The local agency shall provide Title VI training for its managers, supervisors, and staff with frequent public contact every two years.

6. Data Collection. The local agency shall develop procedures for the collection of statistical data of participants in, and beneficiaries of, federal funded roadway projects.

7. Title VI Implementation Program Plan. The local agency subject to Title VI shall develop a written plan for enforcement which sets out its priorities and procedures.

8. Title VI Accomplishments and Goals Report. Develop a Title VI Annual Accomplishment and Goals Report for the past year and goals for the next year.

9. Title VI Complaint Procedures. A local agency that receives federal financial assistance is required to adopt procedures that incorporate appropriate due process standards and provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin.

Public Works staff has completed the above-listed items to achieve compliance with FHWA’s requirements. The proposed Title VI Implementation Plan (Attachment 2) provides in-depth information on how the city will meet or exceed the FHWA Title VI requirements for local agencies. City Council’s adoption of the Title VI Implementation Plan is the final step in allowing the city to achieve compliance with Caltrans and FHWA’s Title VI requirements.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
As part of the Title VI Implementation Plan, Public Works staff will be soliciting quotes for oncall translation services and creating program materials in languages other than English, where appropriate. It is anticipated that the ongoing program costs will be minor.

Compliance with the Title VI Implementation Plan will allow the city to remain eligible for federal funds from the FHWA on future roadway projects.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.
3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11128 – A Resolution Adopting the City of Folsom Title VI Implementation Plan

2. City of Folsom Title VI Implementation Plan
Submitted,

Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Attachment 1

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Resolution No. 11128

RESOLUTION NO. 11128

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF FOLSOM TITLE VI

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act was created in 1964, prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, or national origin; and WHEREAS, similar statutes were later created that extend discrimination protections for sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law; and
WHEREAS, local agencies are required to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act as a condition of receiving federal funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); and WHEREAS, Caltrans and the FHWA require that local agencies adopt a Title VI Implementation Plan that provides guidance for compliance with Title VI; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom adopt the City of Folsom Title VI Implementation Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
____________________________________
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Attachment 2

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

CITY OF FOLSOM

TITLE VI IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Adopted __________, 2023

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Table of Contents
Non-Discrimination Policy Statement ......................................................................... 1 Non-Discriminatory Legislation ................................................................................... 2 Organization Structure ................................................................................................. 3 Title VI Coordinator ............................................................................................... 3 Assistant Title VI Coordinator ............................................................................... 3 Title VI Specialist .................................................................................................. 3 Title VI Liaison ...................................................................................................... 4 Title VI Organization Chart ................................................................................... 4 Complaint Procedure .................................................................................................... 5 Complaints Processed Under the Federal Highway Administration...................... 5 Caltrans OCR Investigation Process .................................................................... 6 Title VI Outreach and Resources ................................................................................. 7 Limited English Proficiency ................................................................................... 7 Title VI Information Dissemination ........................................................................ 8 Environmental Justice .......................................................................................... 8 Data Collection and Analysis ....................................................................................... 8 Contract Documents and Agreements ........................................................................ 9 Training .......................................................................................................................... 9 Annual Work Plan........................................................................................................ 10 Appendix ...................................................................................................................... 11 A. Limited English Proficiency Plan .................................................................... 11 B. Notice to Public .............................................................................................. 15 C. Complaint Form ............................................................................................. 16 D. US DOT Title VI Assurances A-E ................................................................... 18

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
1 Non-Discrimination Policy Statement
The City of Folsom Public Works Department is committed to ensuring compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discriminatory authorities, such that no person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of any program or activity conducted by the City of Folsom Public Works Department on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law.

Further, no person shall be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the City of Folsom Public Works Department, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law.

Title VI compliance is a condition of receipt of federal funds. The Title VI Coordinator is authorized to ensure compliance with this policy, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C § 2000d and related statutes, and the requirements of 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) pt. 200 and 49 CFR pt. 21.

Mark Rackovan Date
Public Works Director
City of Folsom

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
2 Non-Discriminatory Legislation
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Provides that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination, under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance (as implemented through 23 CFR 200.9 and 49 CFR 21).

Section 162(a) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 (Section 324, Title 23 U.S.C.) – Prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex by recipients and sub-recipients of Federal financial assistance.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 – Prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by recipients and sub-recipients of Federal financial assistance.

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Section 6101-6107, Title 42 U.S.C.) – Prohibits discrimination on the basis of age by recipients and sub-recipients or Federal financial assistance.

The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (Public Law 200-209) – Clarifies that the original intent of Congress in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was to apply the non-discrimination statutes to all programs and activities of Federalaid recipients, sub-recipients, contractors and vendors, whether all such programs are federally assisted or not.

Executive Order 12898 (issued February 11, 1994) – Addresses Environmental Justice regarding minority and low-income populations and requires agencies to develop strategies to address disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs on minority and low-income populations; promote nondiscrimination in federal programs substantially affecting human health and the environment; and provide minority and low-income communities access to public information and an opportunity for public participation in matters relating to human health or the environment.

Executive Order 13166 (issued August 16, 2000) – Addresses improved access to services for persons with limited English proficiency. Agencies are directed to evaluate services provided and implement a system that ensures that Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons are able to meaningfully access the services provided consistent with, and without unduly burdening, the fundamental mission of the local agency. Agencies are directed to ensure that recipients of federal financial assistance provide meaningful access to program, services and information to their LEP applicants and beneficiaries free of charge.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
3 Organization Structure
The City of Folsom’s Title VI program is a multi-tiered program in which multiple roles work toward the ultimate goal of assuring full compliance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes. The City has assigned the roles of Title VI Coordinator, Assistant Title VI Coordinators, Title VI Specialist, and Title VI Liaisons to Public Works staff. The roles and responsibilities are as follows:

Title VI Coordinator
 Ensures that City’s Title VI program up-to-date with all requirements set forth by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and any other applicable jurisdictions.  Maintains open line of communication with City Manager, City Council, and other City leadership positions as necessary to facilitate the Title VI Program requirements in a timely manner.
 Directs staff to coordinate and attend trainings, prepare required reports, create and distribute Title VI information for the public, and manage complaints per the Program’s direction.

Assistant Title VI Coordinator
 Assumes role and duties of Title VI Coordinator when the Coordinator is unavailable.
 Works directly with Title VI Specialist to ensure program compliance is met.  Ensures that all applicable staff are present for Title VI trainings, and are following Title VI procedures through work with the public, contractors, and consultants.

Title VI Specialist
 Prepares and coordinates Title VI Plan and Annual Report submission.  Develops Title VI information for dissemination to public.  Ensures that Title VI Assurances have been incorporated into all Federal-aid Contracts and Agreements.
 Develops and coordinates Title VI training for managers, supervisors and staff with frequent public contact, on a two-year minimum basis.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
4  Develops procedures for collection and analysis of statistical data of participants in, and beneficiaries of federally funded roadway projects.  Analyzes data collected to determine effectiveness of outreach methods to avoid group exclusion, and encourage group participation.
 Develops complaint procedures, complaint log, and ensures that all applicable staff are properly trained in the complaint reporting procedures.

Title VI Liaison
 Works directly with contractors, public stakeholders and other relevant parties to ensure that Title VI protections are maintained.
 Attends trainings as to maintain knowledge of current Title VI requirements.  Reports complaints through complaint procedure listed as part of City’s Title VI Implementation Plan.
 Incorporates required Title VI language into Federal-aid contracts and agreements.

Title VI Organization Chart

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
5 Complaint Procedure
The City of Folsom Public Works Department is committed to ensuring compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discriminatory authorities, such that no person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of any program or activity conducted by the City of Folsom Public Works Department on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law.

Any person that believes they have been discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law by the City of Folsom’s Public Works Department, its contractors, consultants or any other party that acts on behalf of the Public Works Department may file a Title VI complaint by completing and submitting the City’s Title VI Complaint Form (Appendix C), which can be found displayed in the City Hall lobby, and online at www.folsom.ca.us/TitleVI.

The City’s Title VI Specialist processes complaints received no more than 180 days after the alleged incident. The Title VI Specialist will only process complaints that are complete, which include at a minimum, the following:
 Complainant’s contact information
 Date of alleged act of discrimination
 Details of the alleged discrimination
 The complainant’s signature
Once the Title VI complaint is received, the Title VI Specialist will forward the complaint to Caltrans, to be submitted to the FHWA Division Office. The Title VI Specialist will also begin processing the complaint by entering said complaint into the City’s Title VI Discrimination Complaint Log. Once a finding has been determined/received, the City’s Title VI Specialist will provide said finding to the complainant within ten business days via letter and/or email.

Complaints Processed Under the Federal Highway Administration Title VI complaints filed with Caltrans in which Caltrans is named as the Respondent will be forwarded to the FHWA Division Office. The Complainant will receive an acknowledgement letter informing them that the complaint has been received and forwarded to the FHWA.

Per the FHWA Guidance Memorandum, Processing of Title VI Complaints, dated June 13, 2018, all Title VI complaints received by a sub-recipient (City of Folsom) are to be forwarded to Caltrans to be submitted to FHWA Division Office. Complaints should be sent within one business day of receipt via email to [email protected]. If Headquarters Office of Civil Rights (HCR) determines a Title VI complaint against a sub-recipient can

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
6 be investigated by Caltrans, HCR may delegate the task of investigating the complaint to Caltrans.

Caltrans OCR Investigation Process
If OCR is delegated the responsibility of performing an investigation, OCR has 90 days to investigate the complaint. If additional time is needed, OCR will call the Complainant and inform them.

If more information is needed to resolve the case, the OCR investigator may contact the Complainant. The Complainant has ten business days from the date of the letter to send the requested information to the investigator assigned to the case.

If the investigator is not contacted by the Complainant or does not receive the additional information within ten business days, OCR can administratively close the case. A case can be administratively closed also if the complainant no longer wishes to pursue their case.

OCR with consult with HCR regarding the disposition of the complaint. Disposition of Title VI complaint will be undertaken by HCR, through either (1) informal resolution or (2) issuance of a Letter of Finding of compliance or noncompliance with Title VI. A copy of the Letter of Finding will be sent to all parties via the Division Office.

A person may also file a complaint directly with the FHWA and/or Caltrans by the following contact information:

Federal Highway Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
Office of Civil Rights
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
8 th Floor E81-104
Washington, DC 20590
California Department of Transportation
Office of Civil Rights
Attention: Title VI Program Branch
1823 14th Street, MS 79
Sacramento, CA 95811
[email protected]
Should a complaint be filed with the City of Folsom Public Works Department and one with a federal or state agency simultaneously, the federal/state complaint will supersede the City’s complaint and the City’s complaint procedures will be suspended pending the federal/state agency’s findings.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
7 Title VI Outreach and Resources
Table 1: Languages Spoken in Folsom’s Residents
Language Spoken Group
Population
Group’s
Percentage
of
Population
Portion of
Group that
Speaks
English Very
Well
Portion of
Group that
Speak English
Less than Very
Well
English Only 57,619 76.8% 57,619 (76.8%) 0 (0%)
Spanish 4,797 6.4% 3,611 (4.8%) 1,186 (1.58%)
Other Indo-European
Languages
4,343 5.79% 3,722 (5%) 621 (0.83%)
Other Asian and Pacific Island
Languages
2,828 3.77% 2,336 (3.1%) 492 (0.66%)
Chinese (incl. Mandarin,
Cantonese)
1,461 1.95% 870 (1.2%) 591 (0.79%)
Vietnamese 812 1.08% 505 (0.7%) 307 (0.41%)
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 743 0.99% 634 (0.8%) 109 (0.15%) Arabic 670 0.89% 617 (0.8%) 53 (0.07%)
Russian, Polish, or other Slavic
Languages
447 0.60% 389 (0.5%) 58 (0.08%)
German or other West
Germanic Languages
429 0.57% 355 (0.5%) 74 (0.1%)
Korean 425 0.57% 257 (0.3%) 168 (0.22%)
Other and Unspecified
Languages
213 0.28% 157 (0.2%) 56 (0.07%)
French, Haitian, or Cajun 197 0.26% 193 (0.3%) 4 (0.01%) Total Population Above 5 Years 74,984 100% 71,265 (95%) 3,719 (5%) Source: US Census: American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimate https://data.census.gov/table?q=C16001&g=160XX00US0624638 Limited English Proficiency
A Limited English Proficiency (LEP) person is a person that does not speak English as a primary language and has a limited ability to read, write, or comprehend English. Per Executive Order 13166, agencies which receive Federal funding must examine their Federally-funded services and develop and implement processes that will allow LEP persons to meaningfully access said services. Executive Order 13166 also requires that agencies receiving Federal funding must establish guidance for providing meaningful access to LEPs, prepare a plan to overcome language barriers in Federally-funded

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
8 programs and activities, and ensure that stakeholders have adequate opportunity to provide input.

As shown in Table 1 above, 5% of residents in Folsom are considered LEP persons, with the largest group of those LEP persons being Spanish speaking (1.58% of the community). As outlined in the City’s LEP Plan (Appendix A), the City has conducted an LEP Needs Assessment, using a Four Factor Analysis to identify need and provide access to the LEP community in compliance with Executive Order 13166.

Title VI Information Dissemination
In order to ensure that Title VI and related Civil Rights information is readily available to the public, the City will develop public notices consisting of posters, flyers, complaint forms and “I Speak” cards that are available in English and Spanish. The languages selected for the informational materials were based upon language data provided from the US Census; see Table 1 above. Said flyers and posters will be placed in the City Hall lobby, in a highly visible and accessible location. The public notices will also be available for viewing on the City’s website, at www.folsom.ca.us/TitleVI.

Environmental Justice
In accordance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations), City staff will identify and address the environmental effects of programs, policies, and activities on minority and low-income populations for Federally-funded projects. Staff will consider demographic data during project design and involve the public in the planning and development process to assess the environmental impacts of projects on the community. The public’s input and demographic data analysis will enable staff to develop measures to mitigate any potential adverse effects on minority and low-income populations.

Data Collection and Analysis
Demographic and related data collected and used by City staff comes from governmental sources responsible for collecting and vetting the information for consistency and accuracy. These sources include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statics, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, California Department of Finance, California Department of Labor, and the California Employment Development Department.

Additionally, staff may also collect project-specific demographic data utilizing data collection as appropriate through the public outreach process on Federally-funded projects. Such outreach that may give Staff the opportunity to collect demographic data may include door hangers, posters, emails, social media releases, press releases to local newspaper, public meetings, virtual meetings, and public comment through websites generated for projects.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
9 Contract Documents and Agreements
The City’s Title VI Specialist will ensure that any Federally-funded project documents contain the necessary Title VI Assurances and other language. Such assurances include, but may not be limited to:
 FHWA Form 1273 (Title VI and other non-discriminatory requirements) o Required on all FHWA contracts and subcontracts valued greater than $10,000
 Title VI Assurances Appendix A-E
o Appendix A-E to be attached to Federal-Aid contracts
Additionally, City staff will include the provisions indicated in the "Administering AgencyState Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects Master Agreement” in the Local Assistance Program Manual (LAPM) in contracts and agreements, where applicable, between the City and contractors.

The City will continue to utilize the "Local Agency Construction Contract Administration Checklist" (Exhibit 15-A of the LAPM), which confirms that DBE and labor/Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) compliance requirements are performed and documented in the project files. Exhibit 15-A of the LAPM documents that the local agency will meet all the requirements prior to the award of a construction contract.

Lastly, the City will continue to utilize the "Resident Engineer’s Construction Contract Administration Checklist" (Exhibit 15-B of the LAPM) on federal-aid projects. The checklist assists in administering federal-aid highway construction projects and provides a record that the EEO/Wage Rate/False Statements posters are being posted at specific locations that employee interviews will be conducted in accordance with the Labor Compliance/EEO interview form, and that DBE requirements are met. City staff will continue to submit Exhibit 15-B, along with the Award Package shortly after award of the construction contract.

Training
The City of Folsom Public Works Department will provide Title VI and related statute training to Public Works managers, supervisors, and staff with frequent public contact in the administration of federal-aid programs. These trainings will occur at minimum every two years, and within six months of hiring a new employee. The trainings will be conducted by the Title VI Specialist, online through presentations, or through trainings hosted by Caltrans. Additionally, links to Caltrans, FHWA, and other applicable agency resources for Title VI and related statutes will be posted on the City’s website at www.folsom.ca.us/TitleVI.

In particular, the following items will be covered in trainings:
 Review of Folsom’s Title VI Implementation Plan and other relevant documents

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
10  Language assistance services and “I Speak Cards” offered for public use  How to handle potential complaints
 Where to seek assistance for Title VI questions and concerns Annual Work Plan
The City of Folsom Public Works Department will annually establish and monitor program goals and accomplishments. The Title VI Specialist will ensure that employee training is conducted, language translation services continue to be available, public participation is optimal, and appropriate Title VI signage is posted. This also includes updating community statistics and corresponding with state and federal agencies as necessary.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
11 Appendix A

LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
Background
Executive Order 13166, “Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency” requires that Federal agencies work to ensure that the recipients of Federal financial assistance provide meaningful access to their Limited English Proficiency (LEP) applicants and beneficiaries.

As such, local agencies are required to ensure that Federally-funded programs and activities normally provided in English are accessible to LEP Persons. Each local agency shall perform an annual assessment to determine if modifications are needed to their programs and activities to ensure meaningful access by LEP persons. The assessment which is referred to as a “FourFactor” analysis is based on the following factors:

1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered.

2. The frequency of LEP contacts.

3. The nature and importance of the programs, services, or activities provided by the City of Folsom.

4. The resources available for LEP persons
The City of Folsom is approximately 25 miles east of Sacramento and has a population of approximately 75,000 (US Census: American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimate).

Four-Factor Analysis

1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered.

As shown in Table 1 below, Folsom has approximately 75,000 residents. 3,719 (5%) of residents in Folsom are considered LEP persons, with the majority of those LEP persons primarily speaking Spanish (1,186, 1.58% of the community).

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
12 Table 1: Languages Spoken in Folsom’s Residents
Language Spoken Group
Population
Group’s
Percentage
of
Population
Portion of
Group that
Speaks
English Very
Well
Portion of
Group that
Speak English
Less than Very
Well
English Only 57,619 76.8% 57,619 (76.8%) 0 (0%)
Spanish 4,797 6.4% 3,611 (4.8%) 1,186 (1.58%)
Other Indo-European
Languages
4,343 5.79% 3,722 (5%) 621 (0.83%)
Other Asian and Pacific Island
Languages
2,828 3.77% 2,336 (3.1%) 492 (0.66%)
Chinese (incl. Mandarin,
Cantonese)
1,461 1.95% 870 (1.2%) 591 (0.79%)
Vietnamese 812 1.08% 505 (0.7%) 307 (0.41%)
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 743 0.99% 634 (0.8%) 109 (0.15%) Arabic 670 0.89% 617 (0.8%) 53 (0.07%)
Russian, Polish, or other Slavic
Languages
447 0.60% 389 (0.5%) 58 (0.08%)
German or other West
Germanic Languages
429 0.57% 355 (0.5%) 74 (0.1%)
Korean 425 0.57% 257 (0.3%) 168 (0.22%)
Other and Unspecified
Languages
213 0.28% 157 (0.2%) 56 (0.07%)
French, Haitian, or Cajun 197 0.26% 193 (0.3%) 4 (0.01%) Total Population Above 5 Years 74,984 100% 71,265 (95%) 3,719 (5%) Source: US Census: American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimate https://data.census.gov/table?q=C16001&g=160XX00US0624638

2. The frequency of LEP contacts.

No data has been collected regarding frequency of contact with LEP persons at the City. Most interactions with LEP persons occur at the City’s Finance Department due to residents paying utility bills. Based on observation from Finance Department front-counter staff, the frequency for translation from Spanish to English is on average once per year.

Public Works staff does not regularly receive requests for translation through Federally funded programs/projects, though the outreach components of said programs/projects do typically have multi-lingual resources. Further, if translation services are needed, staff will provide said translation in a timely manner.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
13 3. The nature and importance of programs, services, or activities provided by the City of Folsom.

From observation provided by Public Works staff, requests for translation services for programs, services, or activities which are Federally-funded have never been received. As stated above, the front counter Staff with the City’s Finance Department are the ones who most frequently encounter LEP persons requesting and/or needing translation services, and those requests occur on average once per year.

Though Public Works Staff has received no requests for translation services on Federally-funded projects, programs and services, Staff is aware that five percent of the City’s residents are LEPs and therefore it is possible that LEPs will be stakeholder in any of the said projects, programs and services. As such, when Staff encounters the need for translation services, Staff will provide the services readily.

4. The Resources Available for LEP persons.

After a review of the City’s currently available resources for LEP persons, the City has determined that the current available resources are lacking and inconsistent. The City will remedy the lack of resources, through the action plan listed in the next section.

Action Plan
In order to ensure compliance with Title VI, and Executive Order 13166 the following publications and services will be made available for LEP person use:
 Non-Discrimination Policy Statement
o Statement shall be printed in English and Spanish. Said statement will be posted in the City Hall lobby in a highly visible location.
 Title VI Rights Poster
o Posters shall be printed in English and Spanish. Said posters will be posted in the City Hall lobby in a highly visible location, and additional copies will be available for the public to review and take.
 Title VI Complaint Form
o Complaint forms shall be printed in English and Spanish. Said forms will be in the City Hall lobby in a highly visible location.
 I Speak Cards
o I Speak Cards will be produced to easily identify translation services needed for Spanish. Said cards will be placed at all public counters and with the other Title VI information.
 Title VI Webpage on City’s Website
o All of the City’s Title VI resources will be posted on the City’s website at the following link: www.folsom.ca.us/TitleVI

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
14  Future Planning and Projects
o Public Works will ensure that all future projects and planning documents that are federally-funded utilize outreach methods that are compliant with Title VI and other related non-discriminatory assurances.
o Additionally, the City will ensure that outreach materials are available in English and Spanish, and that translators are readily available as necessary for any LEP Persons that would like to contribute or participate.

Lastly, the City will contract with an on-demand translation service provider and provide the telephone number for immediate translation services to those who are likely to encounter LEP persons, such that a translator can be contacted the moment one is needed.

To ensure continuous compliance, the City will review the Title VI Implementation Plan and Limited English Proficiency Plan regularly, but at a minimum, as new data from the US Census becomes available. As new regulations are created, the City will act promptly to update the existing plans and relevant resources.

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
15 Appendix B

YOUR RIGHTS AGAINST DISCRIMINATION UNDER
TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND

RELATED NON-DISCRIMINATORY AUTHORITIES
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

The following additional authorities provide protection against discrimination on the basis of sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other category protected by State or Federal law:

Section 162(a) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 (Section 324, Title 23 U.S.C.) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Section 6101-6107, Title 42 U.S.C.) The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (Public Law 200-209) Executive Order 12898 (issued February 11, 1994)
Executive Order 13166 (issued August 16, 2000)
Any person who believes that they have been discriminated against may file a written complaint with the City of Folsom Public Works Department, within 180 days of the alleged discrimination. Additional information and Title VI Complaint Forms can be obtained on the City of Folsom’s website, at the following location:
www.folsom.ca.us/TitleVI . Title VI Complaint Forms can also be obtained from the Public Works Department at City Hall.

To file a Title VI discrimination complaint, please use the following contact information:

City of Folsom
Public Works Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
(916) 461-6712
[email protected]

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
16 Appendix C

TITLE VI COMPLAINT FORM
Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act requires that “No person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” If you wish to submit a Title VI complaint to the City of Folsom Public Works Department, please complete the below information and submit this form to:

City of Folsom
Public Works Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
(916) 461-6702
[email protected]
Name:

Address:

City: State: Zip Code:

Cell: Home:

Name, title, and description of person(s) who allegedly discriminated against you:

Check the box(es) for the type(s) of discrimination that was experienced:

Race Sex Religion
Color Age Sexual Orientation
National Origin Disability Gender Identity
Other (Please Describe):

Date(s) that alleged event(s) took place:

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
17 Location(s) where the alleged event(s) took place:

Is the alleged discrimination still on-going?:

In your own words, please describe the alleged discrimination, explain what happened, and who you believe is responsible:

Please list any person(s) we may contact for additional information to provide further information for your complaint:

Have you filed this complaint with any other federal agency, state agency, federal court, or state court?:

If yes, please check all that apply:

Federal Agency Federal Court
State Agency State Court
Please provide the name, phone number, and email of the contact persons at the agency/court where the complaint was filed, below:

Please sign and date this form on the lines provided below. If any additional space is needed to provide information about this complaint, please attach the additional information to this form.

Signature: Date:

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
18 Appendix D
US DOT Title VI Assurances A-E

APPENDIX A
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “contractor”) agrees as follows:

1. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor (hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the Acts and the Regulations relative to Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S.

Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract.

2. Non-discrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR Part 21.

3. Solicitation for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the contractor of the contractor’s obligations under this contract and the Acts and the Regulations relative to Non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability.

4. Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Recipient or the FHWA to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Acts, Regulations, and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the contractor will so certify to the Recipient or the FHWA, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.

5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a contractor’s noncompliance with the Nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the Recipient will impose such contract sanctions as it or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:

1. withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies; and/or

2. cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.

6. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the Recipient or the FHWA may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the contractor becomes involved in, or threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such direction, the contractor may

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
19 request the Recipient to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the Recipient. In addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

APPENDIX B

CLAUSES FOR DEEDS TRANSFERRING UNITED STATES PROPERTY
The following clauses will be included in deeds effecting or recording the transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or granting interest therein from the United States pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 4:

NOW THEREFORE, the U.S. Department of Transportation as authorized by law and upon the condition that the California Department of Transportation will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon in accordance with Title 23 U.S.C., the regulations for the administration of the preceding statute, and the policies and procedures prescribed by the FHWA of the U.S. Department of Transportation in accordance and in compliance with all requirements imposed by Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. § 2000d to 2000d-4), does hereby remise, release, quitclaim and convey unto the California Department of Transportation all the right, title and interest of the U.S. Department of Transportation in and to said lands described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. (HABENDUM CLAUSE)
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto the California Department of Transportation and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits and will be binding on the California Department of Transportation, its successors and assigns.

The California Department of Transportation, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interest in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person will on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed [,] [and]* (2) that the California Department of Transportation will use the lands and interests in lands and interest in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations and Acts may be amended[, and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above-mentioned non-discrimination conditions, the Department will have a right to enter or re-enter said lands and facilities on said lands, and that above described land and facilities will thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the U.S. Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this instruction].* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to make clear the purpose of Title VI.)

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
20 APPENDIX C

CLAUSES FOR TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR IMPROVED UNDER THE ACTIVITY,

FACILITY, OR PROGRAM
The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the California Department of Transportation pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(a):

A. The (grantee, lessee, permittee, etc. as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree [in the case of deeds and leases add “as a covenant running with the land”] that:

1. In the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the property described in this (deed, license, lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a U.S. Department of Transportation activity, facility, or program is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Acts and Regulations (as may be amended) such that no person on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities.

B. With respect to licenses, leases, permits, etc., in the event of breach of any of the above Nondiscrimination covenants, the California Department of Transportation will have the right to terminate the (lease, license, permit, etc.) and to enter, re-enter, and repossess said lands and facilities thereon, and hold the same as if the (lease, license, permit, etc.) had never been made or issued.* C. With respect to a deed, in the event of breach of any of the above Nondiscrimination covenants, the California Department of Transportation will have the right to enter or re-enter the lands and facilities thereon, and the above described lands and facilities will there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the California Department of Transportation and its assigns.* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary to make clear the purpose of Title VI.)

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
21 APPENDIX D
CLAUSES FOR CONSTRUCTION/USE.ACCESS TO REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED UNDER THE

ACTIVITY, FACILITY OR PROGRAM
The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, permits, or similar instruments/agreements entered into by the California Department of Transportation pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(b):

A. The (grantee, licensee, permittee, etc., as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest ,and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add, “as a covenant running with the land”) that (1) no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land, and the furnishings of services thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits or, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Acts and Regulations, as amended, set forth in this Assurance.

B. With respect to (licenses, leases, permits, etc.) in the event of breach of any of the above of the above Non-discrimination covenants, the California Department of Transportation will have the right to terminate the (license, permits, etc., as appropriate) and to enter or re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said (license, permit, etc., as appropriate) had never been made or issued.*
C. With respect to deeds, in the event of breach of any of the above Nondiscrimination covenants, the California Department of Transportation will there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the California Department of Transportation and its assigns. (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary to make clear the purpose of Title VI.)

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

Title VI Implementation Plan
City of Folsom
22 APPENDIX E
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “contractor”) agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities, including, but not limited to: Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21. • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); • Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CR Part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
• Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); • Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination of the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 – 12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; • The Federal Aviation Administration’s Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); • Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; • Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100);
• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq).

11/14/2023 Item No.9.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Report
November 2023
SPIF Infrastructure
Fee Adjustment
Prepared for:

City of Folsom
Prepared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
November 3, 2023
EPS #142079

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

List of Tables
Table 1. SPIF Summary per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2 pages) ...................... 3 Table 2. Folsom Heights SPIF Summary per
Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft. (2 pages) ............................................................. 5 Table 3. Remaining Developable Land Uses .................................................. 12 Table 4. Folsom Heights Development ......................................................... 13 Table 5. Remaining Developable Land Uses .................................................. 14 Table 6. Summary of Estimated SPIF-Funded
Infrastructure Improvement Costs .............................................................. 19 Table 7. Estimated Roadway Costs (2 pages) ................................................ 21 Table 8. Estimated Dry Utilities Costs .......................................................... 23 Table 9. Estimated On-Site Potable Water System Costs ................................ 24 Table 10. Estimated Off-Site Potable Water System Costs ............................... 25 Table 11. Estimated Off-Site Potable Water and
Sewer System Costs and Sources of Funding ................................................ 26 Table 12. Estimated Recycled Water System Costs ........................................ 27 Table 13. Estimated Sewer System Costs ..................................................... 28 Table 14. Estimated Storm Drainage System Costs (2 pages) ......................... 29 Table 15. Estimated Habitat Mitigation Costs ................................................ 32 Table 16. Habitat Costs Calculation ............................................................. 33 Table 17. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Roadways Costs ............................... 36 Table 18. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Dry Utilities ..................................... 37 Table 19. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: On-Site Potable Water....................... 38 Table 20. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Off-Site Potable Water ...................... 39 Table 21. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Recycled Water ................................ 40 Table 22. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Sewer ............................................. 41 Table 23. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Storm Drainage ............................... 42 Table 24. Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Habitat Mitigation ............................. 43

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 1
Executive Summary
I n t r o d u c t i o n a n d B a c k g r o u nd
The City of Folsom (City) adopted the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee Program (SPIF, SPIF Program, or Fee Program) for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) on September 8, 2015, by Resolution No. 9642.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) prepared the SPIF Nexus Study dated August 28, 2015 (2015 Nexus Study). The Fee Program was requested to be created by property owners in the FPASP to equalize the allocation of costs for SPIF facilities among benefitting properties.

As stipulated in the 2015 Nexus Study, the City anticipated property owners would petition the City to consider one or more Specific Plan Amendments (SPAs).

Such SPAs, if approved by the City, would change the nature and mix of residential and nonresidential land uses. Any such SPAs approved by the City on or before June 30, 2016, would be incorporated into a SPIF Program update.

Between the adoption of the 2015 Nexus Study and June 30, 2016, the City approved SPAs that resulted in a change in the mix of FPASP residential and nonresidential land uses. As a result, EPS prepared a Fiscal Year (FY) 2017-2018 Nexus Study Update (2018 Nexus Study Update). Adopted by the City on January 9, 2018, by Resolution No. 10059, the 2018 Nexus Study Update included updated estimates of costs, land use and other fee program information required to determine the nexus between required infrastructure, habitat mitigation, parkland and public facilities land, and the developable land uses that will drive the demand for the facilities.

As intended and mentioned in the 2015 Nexus Study and 2018 Nexus Study Update, the City may update the nexus study periodically based on several factors, including changes in facility costs greater than annual escalation factors.

In 2020, the FPASP property owners requested an update to the 2018 Nexus Study to ensure the SPIF—Infrastructure Fee is reflective of the cost of SPIF backbone infrastructure construction.

Since the creation of the SPIF Program, the City has escalated the infrastructure portion of the fees using the change in Engineering News and Review’s Construction Cost Index (CCI) on July 1 of each calendar year. In addition, the public land and parkland equalization portion of the SPIF is adjusted on July 1 of every year using the current appraised value of residential land.

After the most recent fee adjustment on July 1, 2023, FPASP property owners and the City agreed to an additional one-time adjustment based on evidence that the escalation in fees calculated using CCI was not keeping pace with actual costs incurred by property owners installing SPIF-funded infrastructure. That one-time

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2
adjustment (the August 2023 Adjustment) was adopted by the Folsom City Council on August 22nd, 2023, with the adjusted fees taking effect on October 23, 2023.

After the August 2023 Adjustment was adopted by the City, EPS and MacKay & Somps, Inc. determined a set of SPIF-eligible infrastructure costs were erroneously omitted from the adjusted fee calculations. In omitting these costs, the total amount of infrastructure improvements to be funded by the SPIF was approximately $26.8 million lower than it should have been.

However, approximately $2.8 million in costs for already constructed improvements were included in the August 2023 Adjustment calculations.

This November 2023 adjustment removes those costs (for already completed improvements), and when combined with the above cost additions, results in a net increase of approximately $23.9 million in total SPIF costs to be funded as compared to the August 2023 Adjustment. All other factors used to calculate fees, including the remaining development capacity in the FPASP, remain unchanged from the August 2023 Adjustment.

Like the August 2023 Adjustment, this November 2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment adjusts the infrastructure portion of the SPIF, accounting for the following:

1. Current construction unit prices. These prices are based on a review of current construction contracts and bids for projects in and around the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Area.

2. Update remaining reimbursements owed to developers and land owners who constructed SPIF-funded improvements. The remaining reimbursement, which reflect the costs of installed infrastructure minus the amount of reimbursements that have been converted to fee credits, are considered “costs” allocated to the remaining development.

3. Changes in outside funding. Certain improvements which were originally expected to be SPIF-funded are now assumed to be funded by other sources.

4. Reflect remaining land uses. As detailed in Chapter 2, this Fee Update the remaining developable land to which these costs can be allocated.

The parkland and public land equalization portion of the SPIF remains unchanged, as do the allocation factors by which the costs are allocated to each land use.

As seen in Table 1 and Table 2, the adjusted fees now range from $28,193 to $59,228 per residential unit ($21,070 to $34,319 per unit for Folsom Heights).

This report describes the process by which EPS updated the remaining costs and land uses to arrive at the November 2023 Adjusted SPIF and includes detailed supporting documentation of the updated costs in technical appendices.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 1
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment SPIF Summary per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Item Low Density High Density Low Density Med. Density High Density Mixed Use Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF)
On- and Off-Site Roadways $18,198 $16,544 $14,890 $13,235 $12,408 $11,581 Dry Utilities $3,967 $3,967 $2,975 $2,975 $2,975 $2,975 On-Site Water $18,483 $11,591 $7,205 $5,952 $5,639 $5,012 Off-Site Water $1,670 $1,047 $651 $538 $509 $453
Recycled Water $5,157 $3,234 $2,010 $1,661 $1,573 $1,399 Drainage $9,146 $7,381 $7,715 $4,628 $4,235 $5,561
Sewer $2,623 $2,623 $1,967 $1,967 $1,967 $1,967
Habitat Mitigation $2,008 $1,013 $706 $363 $291 $339
Administration (3% of sum of all SPIF costs) $1,838 $1,422 $1,144 $940 $888 $879 Total SPIF Cost per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft. $63,090 $48,822 $39,263 $32,259 $30,486 $30,166 FY 2023-24 SPIF Fee Summary (Including Admin.) $59,228 $45,755 $36,703 $30,200 $28,541 $28,193 Difference from FY 2023-2024 SPIF Fee
Amount $3,862 $3,066 $2,559 $2,059 $1,944 $1,973
Percentage 6.5% 6.7% 7.0% 6.8% 6.8% 7.0%
Source: City of Folsom; MacKay & Somps; EPS.

Residential - SPIF Per Dwelling Unit
Single-Family Multifamily
SPIF Summary
Prepared by EPS 10/18/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 3

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 1
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment SPIF Summary per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Mixed Use Industrial/Office General Community Regional
Item Commercial Park (IND/OP) Commercial Commercial Commercial Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF)
On- and Off-Site Roadways $22.28 $18.73 $26.33 $26.33 $19.23 Dry Utilities $3.12 $2.10 $2.53 $2.86 $2.27
On-Site Water $5.84 $4.71 $4.44 $5.02 $3.78
Off-Site Water $0.53 $0.43 $0.40 $0.45 $0.34
Recycled Water $1.63 $1.32 $1.24 $1.40 $1.06
Drainage $12.67 $8.52 $10.27 $11.62 $9.23
Sewer $0.26 $0.52 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26
Habitat Mitigation $0.77 $0.52 $0.63 $0.71 $0.56
Administration (3% of sum of all SPIF costs) $1.41 $1.11 $1.38 $1.46 $1.10 Total SPIF Cost per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft. $48.51 $37.95 $47.48 $50.12 $37.85 FY 2023-24 SPIF Fee Summary (Including Admin.) $45.13 $35.37 $44.23 $46.67 $35.22 Difference from FY 2023-2024 SPIF Fee
Amount $3.38 $2.58 $3.25 $3.45 $2.62
Percentage 7.5% 7.3% 7.3% 7.4% 7.4%
Source: City of Folsom; MacKay & Somps; EPS.

Nonresidential - SPIF Per Bldg. Sq. Ft
SPIF Summary
Prepared by EPS 10/18/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 4

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 2
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Folsom Heights SPIF Summary per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Item Low Density High Density Low Density Med. Density High Density Mixed Use Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF)
On- and Off-Site Roadways $18,198 $16,544 $14,890 $13,235 $12,408 $11,581 Dry Utilities $3,967 $3,967 $2,975 $2,975 $2,975 $2,975 On-Site Water - - - - - - -
Off-Site Water - - - - - -
Recycled Water - - - - - -
Drainage $9,146 $7,381 $7,715 $4,628 $4,235 $5,561
Sewer - - - - - - -
Habitat Mitigation $2,008 $1,013 $706 $363 $291 $339
Administration (3% of sum of all SPIF costs) $1,000 $867 $789 $636 $597 $614 Total SPIF Cost per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft. $34,319 $29,772 $27,074 $21,838 $20,506 $21,070 FY 2023-24 SPIF Fee Summary (Including Admin.) $31,902 $27,638 $25,104 $20,275 $19,035 $19,524 Difference from FY 2023-2024 SPIF Fee (Amount) $2,417 $2,133 $1,970 $1,563 $1,471 $1,546 Difference from FY 2023-2024 SPIF Fee (Percentage) 7.0% 7.2% 7.3% 7.2% 7.2% 7.3% Source: City of Folsom; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Folsom Heights includes only Single-Family, Single-Family Low Density, and Multifamily Low Density residential land uses, and only General Commercial nonresidential land uses. However, this table shows the corresponding SPIF Fee for all FPASP land uses assuming the SPIF Infrastructure Fee components charged to Folsom Heights development.

Folsom Heights SPIF Summary
Residential - SPIF per Dwelling Unit [1]
Single-Family Multifamily
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 5

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 2
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Folsom Heights SPIF Summary per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Item
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF)
On- and Off-Site Roadways
Dry Utilities
On-Site Water
Off-Site Water
Recycled Water
Drainage
Sewer
Habitat Mitigation
Administration (3% of sum of all SPIF costs)
Total SPIF Cost per Dwelling Unit/Bldg. Sq. Ft.

FY 2023-24 SPIF Fee Summary (Including Admin.)
Difference from FY 2023-2024 SPIF Fee (Amount)
Difference from FY 2023-2024 SPIF Fee (Percentage)
Source: City of Folsom; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Folsom Heights includes only Single-Family, Single-Family Low Density, and Multifamily Low Density residential land uses, and only General Commercial nonresidential land uses. However, this table shows the corresponding SPIF Fee for all FPASP land uses assuming the SPIF Infrastructure Fee components charged to Folsom Heights development.

Mixed Use Industrial/Office General Community Regional
Commercial Park (IND/OP) Commercial Commercial Commercial $22.28 $18.73 $26.33 $26.33 $19.23
$3.12 $2.10 $2.53 $2.86 $2.27
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - $12.67 $8.52 $10.27 $11.62 $9.23
- - - - - $0.77 $0.52 $0.63 $0.71 $0.56
$1.17 $0.90 $1.19 $1.25 $0.94
$40.01 $30.76 $40.94 $42.76 $32.24
$37.07 $28.55 $38.03 $39.69 $29.90
$2.94 $2.22 $2.91 $3.07 $2.33

7.3% 7.2% 7.1% 7.2% 7.2%
Folsom Heights SPIF Summary
Nonresidential - SPIF per Bldg. Sq. Ft [1]
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 6

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 7
P u r p o s e o f S P I F A d j u s tm e n t
The City of Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 3.130 establishes the SPIF Program.

Per Section 3.130.030(F)(2), the City shall adjust the fees annually based on general changes in construction costs. For the past several years, since the adoption of the 2020 Nexus Study Update, this adjustment occurred by adjusting the fees based on the change in the CCI, as described above. However, under their rights described in Section 3.130.030(F)(6), property owners requested an additional review and adjustment of the SPIF fees, based on evidence from backbone infrastructure construction contracts that the CCI-escalated SPIF fees were not keeping pace with the actual cost of installing backbone infrastructure.

As this November 2023 SPIF Adjustment is based on general changes in construction costs (described in further detail in Chapter 3), in addition to adjusting the fees based on the remaining land uses and non-SPIF funding for backbone infrastructure, it is considered an adjustment under Section

3.13.030(F).

Compliance with Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602)
AB 602 added Section 66016.5(a) of the California Government Code and requires that any nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, calculate fees for residential uses proportional to building square footage. However, as described above, this November 2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment does not represent an adoption of a nexus study subject to these requirements. The nexus between each land use’s proportionate share of various facility types in the SPIF program remains unchanged, and this report does not request that the City adopt new nexus findings. As such, this November 2023 SPIF Adjustment does not represent a Nexus Study subject to Assembly Bill 602.

In addition, the SPIF Program already meets the requirements Government Code Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B), which exempts fee programs from the square footage if the City makes findings that include the following:

1. An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.

2. An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.

3. That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments, or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 8
With respect to finding 1 above, building square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate SPIF fees for several reasons. The SPIF program charges fees for most residential developments at the time that the final small-lot subdivision map is approved. For almost all developments, this is the final planning entitlement, and represents the point at which residential lot layouts are finalized and any installed infrastructure improvements are accepted by the City. At this stage, many developers have not yet begun to finalize designs for the homes that will be built on each lot and may even sell the subdivision to another homebuilding entity that will ultimately design and construct the home.

As such, at the time that the final maps are approved and SPIF fees are charged, the total building square footage of the development may not be reasonably estimated, and implementing the fee by square footage would be administratively burdensome. In addition, although the SPIF fee is charged as a single fee, each component of the SPIF Fee is calculated by most precisely estimating the demand or impact of each type of infrastructure by each type of housing in the FPASP. For example, impact on storm drainage facilities is directly correlated to the amount of impervious surface that each housing unit creates in the Plan Area, while impact on water facilities is a function of household population. These infrastructure-specific demand factors were adopted by the City in the 2020 Nexus Study Update and constitute a reasonable relationship between each SPIF Program component and the burden posed by development.

Lastly, the City’s residential zoning categories and policies in the fee structure support smaller developments. The nature of the housing market and the development standards in the FPASP result in smaller units being constructed in higher-density residential land use designations, and per-unit fees for the higherdensity land uses are significantly lower than the per-unit fees for low-density land uses. For example, the per unit SPIF fees for the higher density multifamily land uses, where the smallest residential units the Plan Area can be found, are all less than 65 percent of the fees for the lowest density residential land use. Nearly every component of the SPIF Program (with the exception of Dry Utilities and Sewer) charges proportionally less per unit to denser land use categories, as seen in Tables 17 through 24 later in this report. As such, adopting new nexus findings to calculate fees precisely on a square foot basis is unnecessary.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
SPIF Program Overview
The SPIF is a City-implemented plan area-specific development impact fee program applicable only to FPASP land uses.

The SPIF contains the following fee components:

SPIF—Infrastructure Fee.

SPIF—Parkland Equalization Fee.

SPIF—Public Facilities Land Equalization Fee.

SPIF—Administration Fee.

The SPIF Infrastructure Fee Component contains the following categories of improvements and costs:

Roadway facilities.

Dry utility facilities.

Sanitary sewer facilities.

Potable water facilities.

Recycled water facilities.

Storm drainage facilities.

Habitat mitigation for backbone infrastructure.

Supporting Documents
The following documents produced by or for the City have been used to inform this analysis:

Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Document.

Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City and FPASP Property Owners.

Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee Nexus Study Document.

Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee Nexus Study Fiscal Year 2020 Update Document.

Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan Document.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 10
Russell Ranch Specific Plan Amendment.

Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment.

Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment.

Carr Trust Specific Plan Amendment and Tentative Map.

Folsom Heights Specific Plan Amendment.

Broadstone Estates Specific Plan Amendment.

Infrastructure master plans prepared by or on behalf of the City.

O r g a n i z a t i o n o f R e p o r t
This SPIF Program Nexus Study is organized into the following chapters:

Chapter 1 summarizes the SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment.

Chapter 2 identifies the land uses that are subject to the Fee Program.

Chapter 3 describes the SPIF—Infrastructure Fee Component.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 11
Land Uses
As mentioned in the 2015 Nexus Study, the City anticipated one or more property owners to petition the City to consider a SPA. Such SPAs, if approved by the City, would change the nature and mix of residential and nonresidential land uses. Any such SPAs that were approved by the City on or before June 30, 2016, are incorporated into this SPIF Program Update.

In May 2015, the City approved its first SPA for the Russell Ranch project. This Nexus Study Update reflects the land use updates based on the following SPAs that have been approved on or before June 30, 2016:

Westland Eagle SPA; September 22, 2015.

Folsom Heights SPA; June 28, 2016.

Hillsborough SPA; May 24, 2016.

Broadstone Estates SPA; June 28, 2016.

Carr Trust; June 28, 2016.

As a result of the SPAs, the FPASP master land use summary as of June 30, 2016, included 35 single-family dwelling units that are not specifically assigned to one specific ownership entity. As these units are approved and included in the master land use table, they have been included in this Nexus Study Update. It is important to note that these units are anticipated to bear SPIF infrastructure costs, administration costs, and their proportionate share of parkland and public facility land dedication requirements. Table 3 shows the remaining developable land uses throughout the FPASP Area with respect to the June 30, 2016, baseline.

Folsom Heights
The FPASP contains a subarea referred to as Folsom Heights that is located in the eastern portion of the project and borders El Dorado County. Folsom Heights is located within the boundaries of the El Dorado Irrigation District (EID). As such, Folsom Heights will receive its water and sewer services from the EID and will not participate through the SPIF in funding FPASP water and sewer infrastructure.

Consequently, the Folsom Heights development is excluded for the purpose of allocating water and sewer improvement costs to the various land uses. Table 4 shows the Folsom Heights development is excluded from the water and sewer cost allocations. Table 5 details the land uses for remaining the FPASP, as amended by the SPAs through June 30, 2016, less the Folsom Heights development.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 3
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Remaining Developable Land Uses
Land Use Acres Units [1] Sq. Ft. Acres Units [1] Sq. Ft. Acres Units [1] Sq. Ft.

Residential du/acre
Single-Family (SF) 1-4 467.6 1,535 - (180.1) (561) - 287.5 974 - Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 4-7 822.0 4,453 - (588.1) (2,882) - 233.9 1,571 - Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 7-12 278.9 2,509 - (105.0) (833) - 173.9 1,676 - Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 12-20 47.8 896 - - - - 47.8 896 - Multifamily High Density (MHD) 20-30 64.3 1,601 - (14.3) (430) - 50.0 1,171 - Mixed Use District (MU) - Residential [3] 9-30 17.1 343 - - - - 17.1 343 - Subtotal Residential 1,697.7 11,337 - (887.5) (4,706) - 810.2 6,631 - Nonresidential target far
Mixed Use District (MU) - Commercial [3] 0.20 11.4 100,362 - - - 11.4 - 100,362 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 0.30 103.4 1,353,845 - - - 103.4 - 1,353,845 General Commercial (GC) [4] 0.25 54.0 586,970 - - - 54.0 - 586,970 Community Commercial (CC) 0.25 24.5 235,224 - - - 24.5 - 235,224 Regional Commercial (RC) 0.28 42.3 512,443 (11.0) - (133,602) 31.3 - 378,841 Subtotal Commercial 235.6 - 2,788,844 (11.0) - (133,602) 224.7 - 2,655,242 Total 1,933.3 11,337 2,788,844 (898.5) (4,706) (133,602) 1,034.9 6,631 2,655,242 Source: City of Folsom; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Units are an estimate based on target dwelling units. Actual dwelling units may differ but will fall within specified density range. [2] Based on the FPASP approved land uses for final maps and small lot final maps approved through July 15, 2023.

In addition, this includes Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 4, and Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Villages 4 and 8, as they have satisfied their SPIF obligation. [3] Mixed Use District is split 60% residential and 40% commercial. [4] Up to 25% of the General Commercial acres may be developed as office.

Density
Range
Beginning Land Uses
(As of June 30, 2016)
Developed Land Uses
(As of July 15, 2023) Remaining Land Uses
Prepared by EPS 8/10/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m01 07-24-2023 12

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 4
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Folsom Heights Development [1]
Land Use
Target
FAR Acres
Dwelling
Units
Building
Sq. Ft.

Residential
Single-Family (SF) - 42.4 134 -
Single-Family High Density (SFHD) - 55.1 273 -
Multifamily Low Density (MLD) - 14.9 123 -
Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) - - - -
Multifamily High Density (MHD) - - - -
Mixed Use District (MU) - Residential - - - -
Subtotal Residential 112.4 530 -
Nonresidential
Mixed Use District (MU) - Commercial - - - -
Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) - - - -
General Commercial (GC) 0.25 11.5 - 125,673
Community Commercial (CC) - - - -
Regional Commercial (RC) - - - -
Subtotal Commercial 11.5 - 125,673
Total Developable 123.9 530 125,673
Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The City has not approved any final maps or small lot final maps for Folsom Heights development. Therefore, this Nexus Study Update does not adjust Folsom Heights planned land uses.

Folsom Heights Land Uses
June 2016 SPAs
Prepared by EPS 8/10/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m01 07-24-2023 13

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 5
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Remaining Developable Land Uses (excluding Folsom Heights) [1] Density
Land Use Range Acres Units [2] Sq. Ft.

Residential du/acre
Single-Family (SF) 1-4 245.1 840 -
Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 4-7 178.8 1,298 -
Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 7-12 159.0 1,553 -
Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 12-20 47.8 896 -
Multifamily High Density (MHD) 20-30 50.0 1,171 -
Mixed Use District (MU) - Residential [3] 9-30 17.1 343 - Subtotal Residential 697.8 6,101 -
Nonresidential target far
Mixed Use District (MU) - Commercial [3] 0.20 11.4 - 100,362 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 0.30 103.4 - 1,353,845
General Commercial (GC) [4] 0.25 42.5 - 461,297
Community Commercial (CC) 0.25 24.5 - 235,224
Regional Commercial (RC) 0.28 31.3 - 378,841
Subtotal Commercial 213.1 - 2,529,569
Total 910.9 6,101 2,529,569
Source: City of Folsom; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
within the specified density range.
[3] Mixed Use District is split 60% residential and 40% commercial. [4] Up to 25% of the General Commercial acres may be developed as office. [2] Units are an estimate based on target dwelling units. Actual dwelling units may differ but will fall Remaining FPASP Land Uses
Excluding Folsom Heights
[1] Based on the FPASP approved land uses for final maps and small lot final maps approved through July 23, 2023. See Table 3 and Appendix A for details.

Prepared by EPS 8/10/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m01 07-24-2023 14

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
SPIF—Infrastructure Costs
This chapter identifies the FPASP Backbone Infrastructure elements and requirements (as more specifically defined below) as informed by the Specific Plan Document, City master plans, and infrastructure planning documents from other agencies that are included in the SPIF. Specific cost detail and infrastructure segment maps supporting FPASP Backbone Infrastructure are included in Appendices B through L. Cost estimates for SPIF infrastructure are based on information from MacKay & Somps and the City, unless otherwise indicated.

B a c k b o n e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e
Many people tend to use the term “backbone infrastructure” for all publicly owned facilities without specific distinction between backbone infrastructure and public facilities. The Fee Program uses the defined term Backbone Infrastructure to include most of the public service-based items that are underground or at ground level, which may be both on site or off site (i.e., within or outside the FPASP boundaries). Backbone Infrastructure is sized to serve the FPASP as a whole and in some cases may be sized to serve broader development areas, including existing development (e.g., future freeway interchanges). For the SPIF, Backbone Infrastructure includes the following items:

Roadways.1 Sewer Facilities.

Dry Utility Facilities.2 Storm Drainage Facilities.

Potable Water Facilities. Habitat Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure. Recycled Water Facilities.

It is important to note that Backbone Infrastructure costs include roadway median costs (median curbs and landscaping), as well as the costs for sidewalks/trails and streetlights adjacent to backbone roadways. Backbone Infrastructure does not include landscape corridors and soundwalls adjacent to backbone roadway facilities, with minor exceptions to this rule where a backbone roadway is adjacent to an open space area. 1
Includes on- and off-site roadways.
2 Dry utility facilities were included in Roadways in the 2015 Nexus Study; however, cost estimates for dry utility facilities significantly increased in the 2018 Nexus Study Update. Dry utility facilities have since been included and allocated as its own component.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 16
B a c k b o n e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e C o s t
A d j u s tm e n t s
As mentioned in Chapter 1 of this November 2023 SPIF Adjustment, EPS adjusted the Backbone Infrastructure cost estimates to ensure the SPIF Fee Program keeps pace with the actual cost of Backbone Infrastructure construction.

As such, EPS incorporated the following adjustments to update the SPIF Fee Program.

Incorporate Actual Costs
As detailed in Chapter 7 of the 2015 Nexus Study and subsequent nexus study updates, a private party (e.g., developer or landowner) may advance-fund eligible SPIF component (constructed Backbone Infrastructure or dedicated eligible park or public facilities land). That party would be defined as a “Constructing Owner” and will be due a reimbursement from the SPIF Program. The Infrastructure Fee Program Reimbursement Agreement (Fee Reimbursement Agreement) outlines the terms and conditions that a Constructing Owner completes Backbone Infrastructure improvements or dedicates parkland or public facility land and is eligible for fee reimbursement.

The total amount of reimbursement for completed Backbone Infrastructure will be based on actual costs incurred for eligible hard costs based on a properly bid construction contract. All hard costs will be subject to verification by the City and actual costs expended will go through a true-up process upon completion of the infrastructure component. The true-up process, which is more specifically detailed in the Fee Reimbursement Agreement, is the way the City, the SPIF Program Administrator, and the Constructing Owner finalize the amount of hard construction cost and related soft costs that will be subject to SPIF Fee reimbursement. As stipulated in the SPIF nexus study and Fee Reimbursement Agreement, this November 2023 SPIF Adjustment incorporates those reconciled costs for completed infrastructure. These true-up costs are added to the Backbone Infrastructure cost estimates to ensure the reconciled hard and soft costs are reflected in the SPIF Program.

Phase 1 and Phase 2 Construction Costs Adjustments
When EPS prepared the 2018 Nexus Study Update, Phase 1 SPIF facilities were completed to accommodate initial phases of FPASP development. Between the 2018 Nexus Study Update and this 2020 Nexus Study Update, Constructing Owners have engaged with the City in Fee Reimbursement Agreements for all the Phase 1 SPIF Backbone Infrastructure development. In addition, constructing

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 17
owners completed further SPIF backbone infrastructure between the 2020 Nexus Study Update and this November 2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment and have entered (or will imminently enter) into Fee Reimbursement Agreements with the City for these improvements. Improvements constructed during that time period are termed “Phase 2 Improvements.”
As of this November 2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment, EPS removed or adjusted the SPIF Facilities (or portions of) that are included the Fee Reimbursement Agreements to date, including use of Fee Reimbursements that were converted to Fee Credits and used to offset eligible SPIF fees. For the SPIF Program Fee Reimbursement Agreements that have not been fully transferred to SPIF—Infrastructure Fee credits, EPS adjusted the remaining costs using annual construction cost index (CCI) escalation factors. Furthermore, EPS reduced the remaining SPIF Fee Reimbursement amount by the SPIF-Infrastructure Fees paid to the City.

Phase 2 reimbursement agreements were executed based on CCI-escalated costs from the 2020 Nexus Study. For some of these agreements, these CCI-escalated cost estimates for the improvements were significantly less than actual costs incurred by the constructing owners. For agreements where actual costs exceeded CCI-escalated cost estimates, the reimbursement amount was adjusted by the difference between actual costs incurred and the CCI-escalated costs. These adjustments are shown in Table B-5. The Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction cost adjustments, including addition of the true-up costs described above, are provided in Appendix B of this November 2023 SPIF Adjustment.

Escalate Unit Cost Estimates
For the improvements remaining in the SPIF program, Mackay & Somps updated the unit costs based on a review of construction bids for 14 different backbone infrastructure projects in the FPASP area. The updated unit pricing was based primarily on the average of the lowest bid and the overall average bid. For unit prices where this calculation resulted in unit prices more than 10 percent above the unit price in the lowest bid, the updated unit price was based on the lowest bid plus 10 percent.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 18
O t h e r F P A S P D e v e l o pm e n t C o s t s
For this November 2023 SPIF Update, EPS calculated remaining habitat mitigation costs by subtracting the total habitat mitigation costs incurred in Phase 2 reimbursement agreements from the total habitat mitigation costs estimated in the 2020 Nexus Study Update.

B a c k b o n e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e C o s t S umm a r y Table 6 summarizes the estimated cost of Phase 1, Phase 2, and remaining FPASP Backbone Infrastructure (2023$), which includes the following facilities:

Roadways (On-Site and Off-Site).

Dry Utilities.

Water System (On-Site and Off-Site).

Recycled Water System.

Sanitary Sewer System.

Storm Drainage System.

Habitat Mitigation (for Backbone Infrastructure).

In the August 2023 Adjustment, the cost of total remaining FPASP Backbone Infrastructure inadvertently included approximately $2.9 million in roadway improvements that had already been completed by property owners or developers. This SPIF Adjustment removes those costs from the total amount of infrastructure remaining to be funded by the SPIF.

In addition, the August 2023 Adjustment erroneously omitted approximately $24.4 million in SPIF eligible improvements installed by Toll Brothers, as documented in the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreement in Table B-19. These costs are now included in the Phase 2 costs shown in Table 6. In addition, Toll Brothers submitted a True-Up analysis for their Folsom Ranch Phase 2 reimbursement agreement, shown in Table B-17. The total construction costs incurred by Toll Brothers in their Phase 1 improvements, as documented by the True Up Analysis, are used to adjust the amount of Phase 2 reimbursements to be funded by the SPIF, as shown in Table B-5.3 3
Phase 2 here refers to the Phases of the SPIF program, with Phase 1 occurring between 2016 and the 2020-21 SPIF Update, and Phase 2 occurring between that 2020-21 SPIF Update and these 2023 SPIF Adjustments. During Phase 2 of the overall SPIF improvements, Toll Brothers submitted two reimbursement agreements for their Folsom Ranch Development.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 6
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Summary of Estimated SPIF-Funded Infrastructure Improvement Costs (2023$) Phase 1 Phase 2 Remaining Total Funded by Costs at
Improvement Costs [1] Costs [1] Costs [2] Costs Other Sources Buildout Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee
On- and Off-Site Roadways
Backbone Roadway Rough Grading $3,107,902 $17,388,112 $24,705,607 $45,201,621 $0 $45,201,621 Backbone Roadways [3] $2,631,142 $19,394,889 $56,881,251 $78,907,282 $0 $78,907,282 Community Entry Improvements $0 $0 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $0 $2,700,000 Railroad Crossings $222,193 $215,050 $1,951,252 $2,388,495 $0 $2,388,495 City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $264,068 $368,815 $5,403,286 $6,036,169 $0 $6,036,169 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $645,095 $5,080,415 $13,269,462 $18,994,972 $0 $18,994,972 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $55,690 $119,335 $827,852 $1,002,877 $0 $1,002,877 Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Class 1 Trail $0 $331,853 $0 $331,853 $0 $331,853
Total On- and Off-Site Roadways $6,926,090 $42,898,469 $105,738,710 $155,563,269 $0 $155,563,269 Dry Utility $2,715,076 $6,892,170 $18,815,661 $28,422,907 $0 $28,422,907 On-Site Water $8,906,591 $9,432,997 $48,707,592 $67,047,180 $0 $67,047,180 Off-Site Water [4] [5] $20,999,741 $0 $20,784,870 $41,784,611 ($35,726,595) $6,058,016 Recycled Water $794,076 $4,718,729 $13,195,764 $18,708,569 $0 $18,708,569 Sewer [6] $936,431 $6,818,786 $6,666,675 $14,421,892 $0 $14,421,892 Drainage $3,768,439 $19,757,624 $45,982,584 $69,508,647 $0 $69,508,647 Habitat Mitigation $211,118 $1,709,905 $5,119,510 $7,040,533 $0 $7,040,533 Total SPIF Improvement Cost $45,257,562 $92,228,680 $265,011,366 $402,497,608 ($35,726,595) $366,771,013 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [2] Includes costs expected to be funded by SPIF and other funding sources. [3] Backbone Roadways: Assumes CFD No. 18 PAYGO for offsetting revenues. [4] Assumes a combination of CFD No. 2013-1, CFD No. 17, CFD No. 18, and other funds for offsetting revenues. See Table 11 for details.

Summary of SPIF Costs
[5] Off-Site Water - Remaining Phase 1 Costs: Includes costs for existing facilities not reflected in Table B-1 and Table B-11, and will be funded by sources other than the SPIF Infrastructure Fee. See Table 11 for details. [6] Sewer: CFD No. 18 funded portions of SPIF sewer facilities. These facilities have already been completed and are fully funded; and therefore, are not reflected in this table. See Table 11 for details.

Backbone Infrastructure Costs (2023$)
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 19

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 20
The adjustments to the cost estimates of the remaining SPIF-eligible improvements to be installed result in a $2.9 million reduction in total SPIFfunded improvements (existing and future) compared to the August 2023 Adjustment. The adjustments to the Toll Brothers improvements costs result in an increase of $26.8 million in Phase 2 reimbursement costs compared to the August 2023 Adjustment. The net total change from the August 2023 Adjustment is a $23.9 million increase in total costs to be funded by the SPIF.

As shown, a portion of Backbone Infrastructure costs are to be funded through sources other than SPIF—Infrastructure Fee Component revenues. Appendices B through L contain summary and unit cost estimate assumptions prepared by MacKay & Somps. The appendices are organized so that there is a separate appendix for each facility type. Each of these appendices (Appendix B through Appendix L) contains an illustration of the backbone infrastructure and summary of the total costs. Each appendix also contains detailed support for the cost estimates. The backbone infrastructure requirements for each element of the are described in further detail in the 2020 Nexus Study Update.

Tables 7 through 14 summarize the cost of remaining backbone infrastructure by infrastructure type. With the exception of the SPIF Water Treatment Plant component, the costs in these tables were estimated by Mackay & Somps using the updated unit pricing described above.

SPIF Water Treatment Plant Set-Aside Fee
As stipulated in the Water Supply Agreement between the City and the property owners, the FPASP development is responsible for reimbursing the City for having incurred past expenses to expand the water treatment facility and associated conveyance improvements. Therefore, the 2018 Nexus Study Update included approximately $13.4 million (2017$) in Water Supply Agreement existing facilities, of which $5.7 million was to be funded by CFD No. 18 PAYGO revenue and $7.7 million of which was to be included in the SPIF – Infrastructure Fee. The 2020 SPIF Nexus Study Update created a SPIF Water Treatment Plant Set-Aside to reimburse the City for these existing improvements, based on the total amount to be reimbursed to the City and projected amount of funding from CFD No. 18.

This Set-Aside Fee is not payable through the use of reimbursements converted to fee credits and is required to be paid in cash at the time of final map approval (or building permit for multifamily and nonresidential development), so that the City can recoup a portion of its expenditures for the Water Treatment Plant in a timeframe acceptable to the City.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 7
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Roadway Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Percentage 15% 20%

BACKBONE ROADWAYS SUMMARY
SPIF-Funded Roadways
Phase 1 Roadways [1]
Rough Grading - - - $3,107,902
Backbone Roadways - - - $2,631,142
Railroad Crossings - - - $222,193
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System - - - $264,068 Signalized Intersections & Improvements - - - $645,095
Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier - - - $55,690
Off-Site Roadway Improvements - - - $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways - - - $6,926,090
Phase 2 Roadways [1]
Rough Grading $17,388,112
Backbone Roadways $19,394,889
Railroad Crossings $215,050
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $368,815
Signalized Intersections & Improvements $5,080,415
Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $119,335
Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0
Class 1 Trails $331,853
Subtotal Phase 2 Roadways $42,898,469
Remaining Construction
Backbone Rough Grading
Alder Creek Parkway $1,759,952 $263,993 $351,990 $2,375,936 Oak Avenue Parkway $1,500,529 $225,079 $300,106 $2,025,714 East Bidwell Street $0 $0 $0 $0
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Empire Ranch Road $5,453,962 $818,094 $1,090,792 $7,362,849 Rowberry Drive $627,200 $94,080 $125,440 $846,720
Mangini Parkway $3,501,969 $525,295 $700,394 $4,727,659 Savannah Parkway $0 $0 $0 $0
Prairie City Road $5,456,837 $818,525 $1,091,367 $7,366,729 Placerville Road Utility Corridor $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Backbone Rough Grading $18,300,450 $2,745,067 $3,660,090 $24,705,607 Backbone Roadways
Alder Creek Parkway $19,220,675 $2,883,101 $3,844,135 $25,947,911 Oak Avenue Parkway $15,424,906 $2,313,736 $3,084,981 $20,823,622 East Bidwell Street $645,003 $96,750 $129,001 $870,753
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Empire Ranch Road $1,773,690 $266,054 $354,738 $2,394,482 Rowberry Drive $736,920 $110,538 $147,384 $994,842
Mangini Parkway $2,429,890 $364,483 $485,978 $3,280,351 Savannah Parkway $1,645,067 $246,760 $329,013 $2,220,841 Russell Ranch Road $0 $0 $0 $0
Scenic Vista Court $0 $0 $0 $0
Placerville Road $258,110 $38,717 $51,622 $348,449
Subtotal Backbone Roadways $42,134,260 $6,320,139 $8,426,852 $56,881,251 Roadways
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 21

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 7
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Roadway Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Roadways
Community Entry Improvements $2,000,000 $300,000 $400,000 $2,700,000 Railroad Crossings $1,445,372 $216,806 $289,074 $1,951,252 City Fiber Optic & Traffic Signal Control System $4,002,434 $600,365 $800,487 $5,403,286 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $9,829,231 $1,474,385 $1,965,846 $13,269,462 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $613,224 $91,984 $122,645 $827,852 Off-Site Roadway Improvements in Folsom
(Fair Share Cost - Assumed 50%) $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Remaining SPIF-Funded Construction $78,324,971 $11,748,746 $15,664,994 $105,738,710 Total SPIF-Funded Roadways $78,324,971 $11,748,746 $15,664,994 $155,563,269 Roadways Funded by PAYGO [2] $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL BACKBONE ROADWAYS [3] $78,324,971 $11,748,746 $15,664,994 $155,563,269 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [2] Future lane widening of Oak Avenue Parkway and Empire Ranch Road. [3] The horizontal total does not sum because construction, engineering/plan check/inspection, and contingency costs are not provided for the remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 Roadway costs.

Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 22

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 8
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Dry Utilities Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
SMUD Contract
Cost [1]
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Percentage 50% 15% 20%

SPIF DRY UTILITIES FACILITIES
Phase 1 Dry Utilities System [2] - - - - $2,715,076
Phase 2 Dry Utilities System [2] - - - - $6,892,170
Remaining Construction
Backbone Dry Utility System
Alder Creek Parkway $2,275,643 $1,137,821 $341,346 $455,129 $4,209,939 Prairie City Road $3,154,409 $1,577,204 $473,161 $630,882 $5,835,657 Oak Avenue Parkway $1,556,391 $778,195 $233,459 $311,278 $2,879,323 East Bidwell Street $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Empire Ranch Road $698,122 $349,061 $104,718 $139,624 $1,291,526 Rowberry Drive $309,891 $154,945 $46,484 $61,978 $573,298 Mangini Parkway $1,151,683 $575,842 $172,752 $230,337 $2,130,614 Savannah Parkway $215,069 $107,535 $32,260 $43,014 $397,878 Subtotal Backbone Dry Utility System $9,361,208 $4,680,604 $1,404,181 $1,872,242 $17,318,234 Electrical Transmission System - 69 KV Pole Relocation
Alder Creek Parkway $809,420 $404,710 $121,413 $161,884 $1,497,427 Subtotal Electrical Transmission System $809,420 $404,710 $121,413 $161,884 $1,497,427 Subtotal Remaining Construction $10,170,628 $5,085,314 $1,525,594 $2,034,126 $18,815,661 TOTAL DRY UTILITIES COSTS [3] $10,170,628 $5,085,314 $1,525,594 $2,034,126 $28,422,907 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] Reflects the estimated cost SMUD will charge for the installation of backbone electrical conductors. [2] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [3] The horizontal total does not sum because construction, SMUD contract costs, engineering/plan check/inspection, and contingency costs are not provided for the remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 Dry Utility costs.

Dry Utilities
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 23

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 9
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated On-Site Potable Water System Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Percentage 15% 20%

SPIF ON-SITE POTABLE WATER FACILITIES
Phase 1 On-Site Potable Water System [2] - - - $8,906,591 Phase 2 On-Site Potable Water System [2] - - - $9,432,997 Remaining Construction
Potable Water Pipelines System
Alder Creek Parkway $4,147,696 $622,154 $829,539 $5,599,389 Oak Avenue Parkway $2,107,671 $316,151 $421,534 $2,845,355 East Bidwell Street $0 $0 $0 $0
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Empire Ranch Road $1,141,982 $171,297 $228,396 $1,541,675 Rowberry Drive $218,247 $32,737 $43,649 $294,634
Mangini Parkway $1,549,556 $232,433 $309,911 $2,091,901 Savannah Parkway $0 $0 $0 $0
Prairie City Road $2,403,838 $360,576 $480,768 $3,245,182 Subtotal Potable Water Pipelines System $11,568,990 $1,735,348 $2,313,798 $15,618,136 Storage Reservoirs
Zone 3 - Phase 1 $5,590,859 $838,629 $1,118,172 $7,547,660 Zone 3 - Phase 2 $4,668,886 $700,333 $933,777 $6,302,995 Zone 4 $6,103,461 $915,519 $1,220,692 $8,239,672
Subtotal Storage Reservoirs $16,363,206 $2,454,481 $3,272,641 $22,090,328 Pressure Reducing Stations
Zone 3 to Zone 2 $83,502 $12,525 $16,700 $112,728
Zone 4 to Zone 3 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Pressure Reducing Stations $83,502 $12,525 $16,700 $112,728 Booster Pump Stations
Off-site Zone 3 Booster Pump $7,679,000 $1,151,850 $1,535,800 $10,366,650 Zone 3 to Pressure Zone 4 - Phase 2 $385,000 $57,750 $77,000 $519,750 Subtotal Booster Pump Stations $8,064,000 $1,209,600 $1,612,800 $10,886,400 Total Remaining Construction $36,079,697 $5,411,955 $7,215,939 $48,707,592 TOTAL ON-SITE POTABLE WATER COSTS [2] $36,079,697 $5,411,955 $7,215,939 $67,047,180 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [2] The horizontal total does not sum because construction, engineering/plan check/inspection, and contingency costs are not provided for the remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 On-Site Potable Water costs.

On-Site Potable Water
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 24

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 10
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Off-Site Potable Water System Costs (2023$)
Item Percentage Existing [1] Phase1 Phase 2 Total
Existing Facilities Shared Capacity
WTP Phase III $2,450,000 $2,450,000
WTP Phase IVA $1,110,000 $1,110,000
WTP Phase IVB $6,887,000 $6,887,000
Zone 3 East BPS $250,000 $250,000
Natoma Raw Water Pipeline $1,543,000 $1,543,000
Foothills Reservoirs $360,000 $360,000
Zone 3 East Distribution System $500,000 $500,000
Engineering, Admin, Construction Man., and Contingency $265,000 $265,000 Subtotal Existing Facilities $13,365,000 $0 $0 $13,365,000 Plus Escalation [2] $3,263,000 $3,263,000
WTP Set Aside Fee Collected ($3,628,259)
Subtotal Escalated Existing Facilities $12,999,741 $0 $0 $16,628,000 New Facilities
Transmission Pipelines - 24" [2] - $20,784,870 $20,784,870 Subtotal New Construction $0 - $20,784,870 $20,784,870
Subtotal New Facilities [3] $0 $0 $20,784,870 $20,784,870 Systems Optimization Review (SOR)
SOR Incurred $2,300,000 $2,300,000
Willow Hill SOR $0 $5,700,000 $0 $5,700,000
Subtotal SOR $2,300,000 $5,700,000 $0 $8,000,000
Total $15,299,741 $5,700,000 $20,784,870 $45,412,870
Source: Brown & Caldwell; MacKay & Somps.
[1] Phase 1 off-site water system costs based on actual construction costs for Phase 1 water systems.

Folsom Plan Area Cost
Off-Site Potable Water
[2] Existing off-site water system facility hard costs based on the costs included in the SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update, adjusted by 2 years of SPIF Infrastructure Fee escalations, equal to 24.42%, rounded to the nearest $1,000. [3] Does not include Phase 3 and Phase 4 Storage Tanks nor Zone 3 Booster Pump Station improvements. See Table 9 for details of these costs.

Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 25

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 11
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Off-Site Potable Water and Sewer System Costs and Sources of Funding (2023$) Remaining Water CFD 18
Total SPIF Treatment Water & Sewer
Estimated Infrastructure Plant Set- CFD 17 Bond Proceeds Item Costs Fee [1] Aside Fee [1] CFD 2013-1 Willow Hill & PAYGO [2] Total Off-Site Potable Water Facilities
Existing Facilities $12,999,741 $2,175,825 $3,882,191 $0 $0 $6,941,725 $12,999,741 Systems Optimization Review (SOR) $8,000,000 $0 $0 $2,300,000 $5,700,000 $0 $8,000,000 Off-Site Water Pipeline - Phase 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Off-Site Water Pipeline - Phase 2 [3] $20,784,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,784,870 $20,784,870 Subtotal Off-Site Potable Water Facilities $41,784,611 $2,175,825 $3,882,191 $2,300,000 $5,700,000 $27,726,595 $41,784,611 Total $41,784,611 $2,175,825 $3,882,191 $2,300,000 $5,700,000 $27,726,595 $41,784,611 Source: MacKay & Somps; CFD No. 2013-1 Hearing Report; CFD No. 17 Hearing Report; CFD No. 18 Hearing Report; EPS. [1] Off-Site Potable Water Existing Facilities: The SPIF Fee Program originally included $7,655,000 of existing water system costs the City invested in recent years.

The City requested that the City's past investments in the existing water system be allocated to the remaining FPASP land uses and charged as a Set-Aside Fee so the City can more efficiently recover its past water system investments. The amount shown in the SPIF reflects the proportion of SPIF credits that have been executed through July 15, 2020 through which the City will submit a SPIF Fee Program Reimbursement Agreement to be reimbursed by FPASP developers and builders through the SPIF Fee Program. The amount shown for the Water Treatment Plant Set-Aside Fee reflects the balance owed by the remaining undeveloped FPASP land uses. The amounts shown in these funding sources reflect FY 2023-2024 dollars.

See Appendix K for details.
[2] Funding consists of a combination of bond proceeds and PAYGO during the first 20 years of the CFD. [3] The amount shown to be covered by CFD No. 18 is based on a conservative Phase 2 Water Facilities funding approach.

Funding Sources
Off-Site Potable Water &
Sewer System
Costs and Sources of Funding
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 26

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 12
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Recycled Water System Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Percentage 15% 20%

SPIF RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES
Phase 1 Recycled Water System [1] - - - $794,076
Phase 1 Recycled Water System [1] - - - $4,718,729
Remaining Construction
Recycled Water Pipelines
Alder Creek Parkway $4,912,450 $736,868 $982,490 $6,631,808 East Bidwell Street $0 $0 $0 $0
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Mangini Parkway $1,238,866 $185,830 $247,773 $1,672,469 Empire Ranch Road $811,883 $121,782 $162,377 $1,096,042 Rowberry Drive $541,823 $81,273 $108,365 $731,460
Savannah Parkway $0 $0 $0 $0
Rustic Ridge Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Prairie City Road $1,363,500 $204,525 $272,700 $1,840,725 Placerville Road Utility Corridor $488,567 $73,285 $97,713 $659,565 Subtotal Recycled Water Pipelines $9,357,088 $1,403,563 $1,871,418 $12,632,069 Pressure Reducing Stations $417,552 $62,633 $83,510 $563,695 Zone 5 Storage Reservoir $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Remaining Construction $9,774,640 $1,466,196 $1,954,928 $13,195,764 TOTAL RECYCLED WATER COSTS [2] $9,774,640 $1,466,196 $1,954,928 $18,708,569 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fe payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [2] The horizontal total does not sum because construction, engineering/plan check/inspection, and contingency costs are not provided for the remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 Recycled Water costs.

Recycled Water
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 27

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 13
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Sewer System Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Percentage 15% 20%

SPIF SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer System [1] [2]
Sewer Pipelines - - - $936,431
Alder Creek Lift Station - - - $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer System - - - $936,431
Phase 2 Sanitary Sewer System [1] [2] $6,818,786
Remaining Construction
Sanitary Sewer Pipelines
Alder Creek Parkway $909,995 $136,499 $181,999 $1,228,493 Oak Avenue Parkway $0 $0 $0 $0
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Empire Ranch Road $0 $0 $0 $0
Rowberry Drive $218,293 $32,744 $43,659 $294,696
Mangini Parkway $260,426 $39,064 $52,085 $351,575
Savannah Parkway $0 $0 $0 $0
Prairie City Road $2,976,883 $446,532 $595,377 $4,018,792 Folsom Heights Drive $86,230 $12,935 $17,246 $116,411
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer Pipelines $4,451,827 $667,774 $890,365 $6,009,967 Sanitary Sewer Pump Stations & Force Mains
Alder Creek Sewer Lift Station - Phase 2 $130,511 $19,577 $26,102 $176,190 Russell Ranch Sewer Lift Station $0 $0 $0 $0
Sewer Odor Control System $355,940 $53,391 $71,188 $480,518 Subtotal Sanitary Sewer Pump Station & Force Mains $486,451 $72,968 $97,290 $656,709 Subtotal Remaining Construction $4,938,278 $740,742 $987,656 $6,666,675 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER COSTS [3] $4,938,278 $740,742 $987,656 $14,421,892 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [3] The horizontal total does not sum because construction, engineering/plan check/inspection, and contingency costs are not provided for the remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 Sanitary Sewer costs.

Sanitary Sewer
[2] Does not include approximately $4.7 million in improvments for the Phase 1 Alder Creek lift station that were funded by CFD 18.

Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 28

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 14
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Storm Drainage System Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Percentage 15% 20%

SPIF STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES
Phase 1 Storm Drainage System [1] - - - $3,768,439
Phase 2 Storm Drainage System [1] - - - $19,757,624
Remaining Construction
Storm Drain Pipelines
Alder Creek Parkway $7,771,336 $1,165,700 $1,554,267 $10,491,304 Oak Avenue Parkway $3,101,322 $465,198 $620,264 $4,186,785 East Bidwell Street $0 $0 $0 $0
Westwood Drive $0 $0 $0 $0
Empire Ranch Road $613,672 $92,051 $122,734 $828,457
Rowberry Drive $291,553 $43,733 $58,311 $393,596
Mangini Parkway $1,658,658 $248,799 $331,732 $2,239,188 Savannah Parkway $0 $0 $0 $0
Prairie City Road $4,439,167 $665,875 $887,833 $5,992,875 Miscellaneous Storm Drain Improvements $150,000 $22,500 $30,000 $202,500 Subtotal Storm Drain Pipelines $18,025,708 $2,703,856 $3,605,142 $24,334,705 Detention Basins [2]
Combo #1 $707,024 $106,054 $141,405 $954,482
Combo #2 $1,603,181 $240,477 $320,636 $2,164,294
Combo #3 $1,103,746 $165,562 $220,749 $1,490,057
Combo #4 $479,391 $71,909 $95,878 $647,178
Combo #5 $530,554 $79,583 $106,111 $716,248
DB #1 $618,740 $92,811 $123,748 $835,299
DB #2 $635,133 $95,270 $127,027 $857,430
DB #3 $586,765 $88,015 $117,353 $792,133
HMB #1 $550,683 $82,602 $110,137 $743,422
HMB #2 $526,570 $78,986 $105,314 $710,870
HMB #3 $593,265 $88,990 $118,653 $800,908
HMB #4 $500,936 $75,140 $100,187 $676,264
HMB #5 $512,513 $76,877 $102,503 $691,893
HMB #6 $1,142,192 $171,329 $228,438 $1,541,959
Storm Drainage
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 29

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 14
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Storm Drainage System Costs (2023$)
Item Construction
Engineering/
Plan Check/
Inspection Contingency Total
Storm Drainage
HMB #8 $828,852 $124,328 $165,770 $1,118,950
HMB #9 $548,302 $82,245 $109,660 $740,208
HMB #10 $791,156 $118,673 $158,231 $1,068,061
HMB #11 $569,218 $85,383 $113,844 $768,444
HMB #12 $863,036 $129,455 $172,607 $1,165,099
HMB #13 $859,511 $128,927 $171,902 $1,160,340
HMB #14 $798,235 $119,735 $159,647 $1,077,617
HMB #15 $686,463 $102,969 $137,293 $926,725
Subtotal Detention Basins $16,035,466 $2,405,320 $3,207,093 $21,647,879 Subtotal Remaining Construction $34,061,174 $5,109,176 $6,812,235 $45,982,584 TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE COSTS [3] $34,061,174 $5,109,176 $6,812,235 $69,508,647 Source: MacKay & Somps.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Infrastructure Backbone Facility costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [2] In this SPIF Nexus Study FY 2023 Update, DB No. 4 is combined with HMB No. 15, HMB No. 7 is combined with HMB No. 6, and HMB No. 17 is combined with HMB No. 18. [3] The horizontal total does not sum because construction, engineering/plan check/inspection, and contingency costs are not provided for the remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 Storm Drainage costs.

Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 30

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 31
This November 2023 SPIF Adjustment updates this fee based on (1) escalated cost of the share of existing City facilities for which FPASP development is responsible for funding; (2) Water Treatment Plant Set-Aside fees collected to date; and (3) updated revenue projections for CFD No. 18. As seen in Table 10, the remaining amount of reimbursement owed to the City for existing facilities is approximately $13.0 million. Approximately $2.2 million is to be reimbursed to the City through the SPIF Fee Program Reimbursement Agreement, and another $6.9 million is to be paid by CFD No. 18, leaving $3.8 million to be allocated to the remaining land uses through the Water Treatment Plan Set-Aside.

Habitat Mitigation Costs
The 2020 Nexus Study Update estimated remaining habitat mitigation costs by calculating the acreage of various habitat types that were projected to be impacted by SPIF Infrastructure construction and multiplying these acres by current estimates of per-acre mitigation costs for each habitat type. Recognizing that the remaining SPIF infrastructure will be constructed over an extended period of time and that habitat mitigation costs over this time period are difficult to predict, EPS estimated remaining habitat mitigation costs in the following manner.

First, the remaining habitat mitigation costs from the 2020 Nexus Study Update were escalated to current year dollars (2023$). EPS then subtracted the total habitat mitigation costs incurred by constructing owners during Phase 2, as documented by Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreements. The resulting figure of $5.1 million, as shown in Table 15 and 16, is then allocated to the remaining land uses.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 15
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Estimated Habitat Mitigation Costs (2023$)
Remaining Remaining Remaining
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Item Costs [1] Costs [1] Costs [2] Total
Total Habitat Costs $211,118 $1,709,905 $5,119,510 $7,040,533 Source: ECORP Consulting, Inc.; City of Folsom; EPS.
[1] The Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs shown reflect the Phase 1 and Phase 2 SPIF Habitat Mitigation costs included in SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements that have not been converted to SPIF credit, SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023, plus SPIF True-Up amounts. See Table B-1 through Table B-30 for details. [2] See Table 16 for further detail on remaining costs.

Habitat Mitigation
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 32

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 16
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Habitat Costs Calculation
2020 Nexus Study
Remaining Costs (2020$)
Remaining
Costs
(2023/24$)
Factor Escalated Amount
Toll Brothers
Folsom Ranch
Russell Ranch
Phase 2
Eagle Parcel
85A
Eagle Parcel
61+77 Total
$5,793,310 18.65% $6,873,763 $93,119 $395,718 $710,794 $554,622 $1,754,253 $5,119,510 Source: 2019-2020 SPIF Nexus Study; MacKay and Somps; EPS.

Escalation to 2023/24$
Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreement
Habitat Costs
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 33

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 34
Infrastructure Cost Allocation
As described in Chapter 3, SPIF—Infrastructure Costs, the cost estimates for Backbone infrastructure include the design and construction costs for the following types of facilities:

Roadways.

Dry Utilities.

On-Site Potable Water System.

Off-Site Potable Water System.

Recycled Water System.

Sanitary Sewer System.

Storm Drainage System.

Habitat Mitigation (for Backbone Infrastructure).

The methodology for determining how these costs are allocated to each type of land use in the FPASP are described in detail in the 2020 Nexus Study Update and summarized below:

1. Determine the total amount of land uses that will benefit from the infrastructure improvements (discussed in Chapter 2).

2. Determine the cost of infrastructure needed to serve new development (identified by the Specific Plan Document, City, and discussed in this Chapter 4).

3. Determine the net cost of infrastructure to be funded by the SPIF after accounting for other funding sources (calculated in this Chapter 4).

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 35

4. Determine the proportionate impact and the appropriate share of costs attributable to each land use:
a. Determine the appropriate factor to allocate the cost of required infrastructure improvements by improvement type (presented in this Chapter 4).
b. Apply the appropriate allocation factor to the anticipated land uses to determine the total number of equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) (see Tables 17 through 24).
c. Determine the percentage of total EDUs by land use category (Tables 17 through 24).
d. Multiply the percentage of EDUs by land use category by the total infrastructure cost by improvement type (Tables 17 through 24). e. Divide the allocated cost by land use type by the number of units by land use type to determine the justifiable fee per unit (for residential) or by building square feet to determine the justifiable fee per building square feet (for nonresidential).

As described above, the cost allocation factors used in this November 2023 SPIF Adjustment are unchanged from the 2020 Nexus Study Update.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 17
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Roadways Costs (2023$)
PM Peak PM Peak
Trips per Hour Trips Avg. Trip New Vehicle Cost per
Developable Units or Unit or 1,000 per Acre Length Trips Mile Trips EDU Total Percentage Cost Unit or Land Use Category ITE Code Acres Bldg. Sq. Ft. Bldg. Sq. Ft. (Nonres Only) (Miles) (Percentage) (VMT) Factor EDUs Allocation Distribution Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D E F G=C*E*F H=G/SFHD G I=B*G J=I/Total I K=J*Total K K/B Residential units per unit per unit per unit per unit per unit Single-Family (SF) 287.5 974 1.10 - 5.0 100% 5.50 1.10 1,071 11.39% $17,725,309 $18,198 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 233.9 1,571 1.00 - 5.0 100% 5.00 1.00 1,571 16.71% $25,990,723 $16,544 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 173.9 1,676 0.90 - 5.0 100% 4.50 0.90 1,508 16.04% $24,955,065 $14,890 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 0.80 - 5.0 100% 4.00 0.80 717 7.62% $11,858,785 $13,235 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 0.75 - 5.0 100% 3.75 0.75 878 9.34% $14,529,824 $12,408 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 0.70 - 5.0 100% 3.50 0.70 240 2.55% $3,972,230 $11,581 Subtotal Residential 810.2 6,631 5,986 63.66% $99,031,935 Formula A B C D=C*(B/A)/1000 E F G=D*E*F H=G/SFHD G I=A*H J=I/Total I K=J*Total K K/B Nonresidential bldg. sq. ft. per 1,000 SF per acre per acre per acre per acre per bldg. sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 820 Shopping Center 11.4 100,362 3.71 32.66 2.75 66% 59.28 11.86 135 1.44% $2,236,104 $22.28 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 750 Office Park 103.4 1,353,845 1.48 19.38 4.25 90% 74.11 14.82 1,533 16.30% $25,359,126 $18.73 General Commercial (GC) 820 Shopping Center 54.0 586,970 3.71 40.31 3.25 66% 86.47 17.29 934 9.94% $15,455,722 $26.33 Community Commercial (CC) 820 Shopping Center 24.5 235,224 3.71 35.62 3.25 66% 76.40 15.28 374 3.98% $6,193,769 $26.33 Regional Commercial (RC) 826 Specialty Retail Store 31.3 378,841 2.71 32.75 3.25 66% 70.25 14.05 440 4.68% $7,286,614 $19.23 Subtotal Nonresidential 224.7 2,655,242 3,417 36.34% $56,531,334 Total Plan Area 1,034.9 9,403 100.00% $155,563,269
Source: MacKay & Somps; City of Folsom; ITE Vehicle Trip Generation Rates - 9th Edition; EPS.

Roadways
Land Uses
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 36

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 18
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Dry Utilities (2023$)
Land Use
Developable
Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

A-EDU
Factor
Total
A-EDUs
Distribution
of A-EDUs
Assigned
Cost-A
B-EDU
Factor
Total
B-EDUs
Distribution
of B-EDUs
Assigned
Cost-B
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=C*A E=D/Total Acres F=Total Cost*E G H=G*B or G*A I=H/Subtotal H J=Subtotal F*I K=J/A L=J/B Residential units per acre per unit per unit
Single-Family (SF) 287.5 974 1.00 288 27.8% $7,896,391 1.00 974 17.4% $3,863,714 $13,439 $3,967 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 233.9 1,571 1.00 234 22.6% $6,423,761 1.00 1,571 28.0% $6,231,925 $26,645 $3,967 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 173.9 1,676 1.00 174 16.8% $4,775,649 0.75 1,257 22.4% $4,986,333 $28,677 $2,975 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 1.00 48 4.6% $1,312,853 0.75 672 12.0% $2,665,725 $55,768 $2,975 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 1.00 50 4.8% $1,373,743 0.75 878 15.7% $3,483,888 $69,654 $2,975 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 1.00 17 1.7% $469,661 0.75 257 4.6% $1,020,473 $59,677 $2,975 Subtotal 810.2 6,631 810 78.3% $22,252,057 5,610 100.0% $22,252,057 Nonresidential sq. ft. per acre per acre per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 1.00 11 1.1% $313,107 1.00 11 5.1% $313,107 $27,466 $3.12 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 1.00 103 10.0% $2,840,211 1.00 103 46.0% $2,840,211 $27,466 $2.10 General Commercial (GC) 54.0 586,970 1.00 54 5.2% $1,483,688 1.00 54 24.0% $1,483,688 $27,466 $2.53 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 1.00 25 2.4% $672,906 1.00 25 10.9% $672,906 $27,466 $2.86 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 1.00 31 3.0% $860,939 1.00 31 14.0% $860,939 $27,466 $2.27 Subtotal 224.7 2,655,242 225 21.7% $6,170,850 225 100.0% $6,170,850 Total Project 1,034.9 1,035 100.0% $28,422,907 $28,422,907 Source: MacKay & Somps; EPS
Dry Utilities
Land Uses Cost Allocation Basis Dry Utilities Cost Allocation Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 37

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 19
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: On-Site Potable Water (2023$) Land Use
Dev.

Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

Water
Demand [1]
Total
Demand
Distribution
of Demand
Assigned
Cost
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=C*A or B E=D/Total Demand F=Total Cost*E G=F/A H=F/B Residential units per unit per unit
Single-Family (SF) 245.1 840 0.59 496 23.2% $15,525,359 $63,342 $18,483 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 178.8 1,298 0.37 480 22.4% $15,044,812 $84,132 $11,591 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 159.0 1,553 0.23 357 16.7% $11,189,473 $70,391 $7,205 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 0.19 170 8.0% $5,333,005 $111,569 $5,952 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 0.18 211 9.8% $6,602,976 $132,015 $5,639 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 0.16 55 2.6% $1,719,192 $100,538 $5,012 Subtotal 697.8 6,101 1,769 82.7% $55,414,816
Nonresidential sq. ft. per acre per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 1.64 19 0.9% $585,678 $51,375 $5.84 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 1.97 204 9.5% $6,381,740 $61,713 $4.71 General Commercial (GC) 42.5 461,297 1.54 65 3.1% $2,049,337 $48,243 $4.44 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 1.54 38 1.8% $1,181,945 $48,243 $5.02 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 1.46 46 2.1% $1,433,664 $45,737 $3.78 Subtotal 213.1 2,529,569 371 17.3% $11,632,363
Total Project 910.9 2,140 100.0% $67,047,180
Source: Folsom Specific Plan Area Water Supply Assessment (June 2010), MacKay & Somps, EPS [1] Residential: acre feet/dwelling unit/year; nonresidential: acre feet/acre/year On-Site
Potable Water
Land Uses
Excluding Folsom
Heights Cost Allocation Basis Water Cost Allocation
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 38

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 20
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Off-Site Potable Water (2023$) Land Use
Dev.

Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

Water
Demand [1]
Total
Demand
Distribution
of Demand
Assigned
Cost
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=C*A or B E=D/Total Demand F=Total Cost*E G=F/A H=F/B Residential units per unit per unit
Single-Family (SF) 245.1 840 0.59 496 23.2% $1,402,786 $5,723 $1,670 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 178.8 1,298 0.37 480 22.4% $1,359,367 $7,602 $1,047 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 159.0 1,553 0.23 357 16.7% $1,011,020 $6,360 $651 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 0.19 170 8.0% $481,861 $10,081 $538 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 0.18 211 9.8% $596,609 $11,928 $509 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 0.16 55 2.6% $155,337 $9,084 $453 Subtotal 697.8 6,101 1,769 82.7% $5,006,979
Nonresidential sq. ft. per acre per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 1.64 19 0.9% $52,919 $4,642 $0.53 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 1.97 204 9.5% $576,619 $5,576 $0.43 General Commercial (GC) 42.5 461,297 1.54 65 3.1% $185,167 $4,359 $0.40 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 1.54 38 1.8% $106,794 $4,359 $0.45 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 1.46 46 2.1% $129,538 $4,133 $0.34 Subtotal 213.1 2,529,569 371 17.3% $1,051,037
Total Project 910.9 2,140 100.0% $6,058,016
Source: Folsom Specific Plan Area Water Supply Assessment (June 2010), MacKay & Somps, EPS [1] Residential: acre feet/dwelling unit/year; nonresidential: acre feet/acre/year Off-Site
Potable Water
Land Uses
Excluding Folsom
Heights Cost Allocation Basis Water Cost Allocation
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 39

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 21
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Recycled Water (2023$)
Land Use
Dev.

Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

Water
Demand [1]
Total
Demand
Distribution
of Demand
Assigned
Cost
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=C*A or B E=D/Total Demand F=Total Cost*E G=F/A H=F/B Residential units per unit per unit
Single-Family (SF) 245.1 840 0.59 496 23.2% $4,332,132 $17,675 $5,157 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 178.8 1,298 0.37 480 22.4% $4,198,042 $23,476 $3,234 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 159.0 1,553 0.23 357 16.7% $3,122,264 $19,642 $2,010 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 0.19 170 8.0% $1,488,100 $31,132 $1,661 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 0.18 211 9.8% $1,842,467 $36,837 $1,573 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 0.16 55 2.6% $479,716 $28,054 $1,399 Subtotal 697.8 6,101 1,769 82.7% $15,462,722
Nonresidential sq. ft. per acre per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 1.64 19 0.9% $163,425 $14,336 $1.63 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 1.97 204 9.5% $1,780,734 $17,220 $1.32 General Commercial (GC) 42.5 461,297 1.54 65 3.1% $571,838 $13,461 $1.24 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 1.54 38 1.8% $329,805 $13,461 $1.40 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 1.46 46 2.1% $400,044 $12,762 $1.06 Subtotal 213.1 2,529,569 371 17.3% $3,245,847
Total Project 910.9 2,140 100.0% $18,708,569
Source: Folsom Specific Plan Area Water Supply Assessment (June 2010), MacKay & Somps, EPS [1] Residential: acre feet/dwelling unit/year; nonresidential: acre feet/acre/year Recycled Water
Land Uses
Excluding Folsom
Heights Cost Allocation Basis Water Cost Allocation
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 40

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 22
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Sewer (2023$)
Land Use
Dev.

Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

ESDs per
Unit/
1k Sq. Ft. [1]
Total
EDUs
Distribution
of EDUs
Assigned
Cost
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=B*C or E=D/Total EDUs F=Total Cost*E G=F/A H=F/B D=B/1,000*C
Residential units per unit per unit
Single-Family (SF) 245.1 840 1.00 840 15.3% $2,203,181 $8,989 $2,623 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 178.8 1,298 1.00 1,298 23.6% $3,404,439 $19,038 $2,623 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 159.0 1,553 0.75 1,165 21.2% $3,054,946 $19,218 $1,967 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 0.75 672 12.2% $1,762,544 $36,873 $1,967 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 0.75 878 16.0% $2,303,504 $46,054 $1,967 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 0.75 257 4.7% $674,724 $39,458 $1,967 Subtotal 697.8 6,101 5,110 92.9% $13,403,337
Nonresidential sq. ft. per 1k sq. ft. per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 0.10 10 0.2% $26,323 $2,309 $0.26 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 0.20 271 4.9% $710,182 $6,868 $0.52 General Commercial (GC) 42.5 461,297 0.10 46 0.8% $120,991 $2,848 $0.26 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 0.10 24 0.4% $61,695 $2,518 $0.26 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 0.10 38 0.7% $99,364 $3,170 $0.26 Subtotal 213.1 2,529,569 388 7.1% $1,018,555
Total Project 910.9 5,499 100.0% $14,421,892
Source: MacKay & Somps; SASD; EPS.
[1] Reflects Sacramento Area Sewer District (SAS) ESD factors for monthly rates.

Sewer
Land Uses
Excluding Folsom
Heights Cost Allocation Basis Sewer Cost Allocation
Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 41

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 23
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Storm Drainage (2023$)
Land Use
Developable
Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

Impervious
Area per Acre
Total
EDUs
Distribution
of EDUs
Assigned
Cost
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=C*A E=D/Total EDUs F=Total Cost*E G=F/A H=F/B Residential units per unit
Single-Family (SF) 287.5 974 0.25 72 12.8% $8,908,195 $30,985 $9,146 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 233.9 1,571 0.40 94 16.7% $11,594,990 $49,576 $7,381 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 173.9 1,676 0.60 104 18.6% $12,930,184 $74,364 $7,715 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 0.70 33 6.0% $4,147,010 $86,758 $4,628 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 0.80 40 7.1% $4,959,254 $99,151 $4,235 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 0.90 15 2.7% $1,907,426 $111,545 $5,561 Subtotal 810.2 6,631 359 63.9% $44,447,060
Nonresidential sq. ft. per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 0.90 10 1.8% $1,271,617 $111,545 $12.67 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 0.90 93 16.6% $11,534,909 $111,545 $8.52 General Commercial (GC) 54.0 586,970 0.90 49 8.7% $6,025,682 $111,545 $10.27 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 0.90 22 3.9% $2,732,862 $111,545 $11.62 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 0.90 28 5.0% $3,496,518 $111,545 $9.23 Subtotal 224.7 2,655,242 202 36.1% $25,061,588
Total Project 1,034.9 561 100.0% $69,508,647
Source: MacKay & Somps, EPS
Storm Drainage
Land Uses Cost Allocation Basis Drainage Cost Allocation Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 42

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table 24
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Infrastructure Cost Allocation: Habitat Mitigation (2023$) Land Use
Developable
Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.

EDU
Factor
Total
EDUs
Distribution
of EDUs
Assigned
Cost
per
Acre
per Unit/
Sq. Ft.

Formula A B C D=C*A E=D/Total Acres F=Total Cost*E G=F/A H=F/B Residential units per acre per unit
Single-Family (SF) 287.5 974 1.00 288 27.8% $1,955,986 $6,803 $2,008 Single-Family High Density (SFHD) 233.9 1,571 1.00 234 22.6% $1,591,206 $6,803 $1,013 Multifamily Low Density (MLD) 173.9 1,676 1.00 174 16.8% $1,182,958 $6,803 $706 Multifamily Medium Density (MMD) 47.8 896 1.00 48 4.6% $325,202 $6,803 $363 Multifamily High Density (MHD) 50.0 1,171 1.00 50 4.8% $340,285 $6,803 $291 Mixed Use (MU) - Residential 17.1 343 1.00 17 1.7% $116,338 $6,803 $339 Subtotal 810.2 6,631 810 78.3% $5,511,974
Nonresidential sq. ft. per acre per sq. ft.

Mixed Use (MU) - Commercial 11.4 100,362 1.00 11 1.1% $77,559 $6,803 $0.77 Industrial/Office Park (IND/OP) 103.4 1,353,845 1.00 103 10.0% $703,538 $6,803 $0.52 General Commercial (GC) 54.0 586,970 1.00 54 5.2% $367,519 $6,803 $0.63 Community Commercial (CC) 24.5 235,224 1.00 25 2.4% $166,683 $6,803 $0.71 Regional Commercial (RC) 31.3 378,841 1.00 31 3.0% $213,260 $6,803 $0.56 Subtotal 224.7 2,655,242 225 21.7% $1,528,558
Total Project 1,034.9 1,035 100.0% $7,040,533
Source: ECORP Consulting, Inc.; MacKay & Somps; EPS
Habitat Mitigation
Land Uses Cost Allocation Basis Habitat Mitigation Cost Allocation Prepared by EPS 10/19/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023 43

11/14/2023 Item No.10.
2023 SPIF Infrastructure Fee Adjustment
November 3, 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 44
SPIF Program Adjustments and
Implementation
A u t om a t i c I n f l a t i o n A d j u s tm e n t s As more specifically described in the SPIF Ordinance, the costs on which the SPIF is based shall be updated annually based on changes in actual cost experiences (using unit price and other cost data from completed projects) or using a construction cost index such as the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (CCI). In the event an index is used, in July of each calendar year, the City will adjust the SPIF—Infrastructure Fee Component by the average of the change in the San Francisco CCI and the change in the 20-city CCI as reported in the Engineering News Record for the 12-month period ending in May.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

APPENDICES:

Appendix A: Final Map Approvals
Appendix B: Prior Phase Summary
Cost Adjustments
Appendix C: Reimbursement
Agreement Balances
Appendix D: Roadways
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix E: Dry Utility
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix F: On-Site Potable Water
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix G: Off-Site Potable Water
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix H: Recycled Water
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix I: Sanitary Sewer
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix J: Storm Drainage
Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix K: Accompanying Exhibits from
MacKay & Somps, Inc.

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

APPENDIX A:

Final Map Approvals

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table A-1
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Final Map Approvals [1]
Total Lots
Item Lots Unit Type Lots Unit Type
Fiscal Year
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 1 FM 108 SFHD - - 108
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 9 FM 103 SFHD - - 103
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 8 FM 78 SFHD - - 78
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 2 FM 98 SFHD - - 98
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 6 FM 43 SFHD - - 43
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 1 FM 52 SF - - 52
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 7 FM 41 SFHD - - 41
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 2 FM 25 SF - - 25
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 3 FM 26 SF - - 26
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 8 FM 52 SFHD - - 52
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 5 FM 41 SF - - 41
Russell Ranch Phase 1 Village 4 FM 114 MLD - - 114
Carr Trust Final Map 28 SFHD - - 28
White Rock Springs Ranch Village 1 FM 93 SFHD - - 93
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 5 FM 87 SFHD - - 87
White Rock Springs Ranch Villages 8 & 9 FM 86 SF - - 86 Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 6 FM 116 SFHD - - 116
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 7 FM 108 SFHD - - 108
White Rock Springs Ranch Villages 2 and 3 FM 29 SF 52 SFHD 81 White Rock Springs Ranch Villages 4, 5, 6 and 7 FM 21 SF 114 SFHD 135 Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 7 FM 68 SF - - 68
Enclave at Folsom Ranch FM 111 MLD - - 111
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 4 FM 86 SFHD - - 86
Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 4 FM 73 SFHD - - 73
Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 8 FM 36 MLD - - 36
Creekstone Phase 1 FM 71 MLD - - 71
Rockcress at Folsom Ranch FM 118 MLD - - 118
Mangini Ranch Phase 1 Village 3 FM 49 SFHD - - 49
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 1B and 1C FM 180 SFHD 18 MLD 198 Russell Ranch Phase 3A FM 103 SFHD 139 SF 242
Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 2 FM 74 SFHD - - 74
Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 1 FM 88 SFHD - - 88
Russell Ranch Phase 3B FM 110 SFHD - - 110
Mangini Ranch Phase 1C Village 1 FM 100 MLD - - 100
Mangini Ranch Phase 1C Village 2 FM 41 MLD - - 41
Mangini Ranch Phase 1C North Village 3 FM 35 MLD - - 35 Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 1D FM 55 SFHD 43 MLD 98 Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 3 FM 53 SFHD - - 53
Mangini Ranch Phase 1C South Village 4 115 MLD - - 115
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 1E 116 SFHD 31 MLD 147 Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village 1 102 SFHD - - 102
Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Villages 2 & 3 116 SFHD - - 116
Manigini Ranch Phase 3 Village 4 42 MLD - - 42
Russell Ranch Phase 2 Villages 1, 2 and 4 208 SFHD - - 208 Russell Ranch Phase 2 Village 3 63 SFHD - - 63
Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village 5 & 6 153 SFHD - - 153
Broadstone Estates Small Lot Map 81 SF - - 81
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 1F 100 SFHD - - 100 Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 3A 135 SFHD - - 135 Source: City of Folsom; Mackay and Somps; EPS.
[1] Does not include building permits issued for 152 MHD units for St. Anton.

Unit Type 1 Unit Type 2
Prepared by EPS 8/3/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m01 07-24-2023 Page 151 11/14/2023 Item No.10.

APPENDIX B:

Prior Phase Summary Cost Adjustments
Table B-1 Summary of Phase 1 Remaining SPIF
Infrastructure Costs ......................................... B-1 Table B-2 TNHC Only/Lennar Phase 1 Backbone
Facilities Reimbursement Analysis ...................... B-2 Table B-3 East Carpenter Improvement Company, LLC
(ECIC)/Enclave at Folsom Ranch, LLC (Enclave)
Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis ........ B-3 Table B-4 Summary of Phase 2 Remaining SPIF
Infrastructure Costs ......................................... B-4 Table B-5 Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreements
True-Up/Make-Up Adjustments .......................... B-5 Table B-6 ECIC Village 3 Reimbursement Agreement ........... B-6 Table B-7 Mangini Improvement Company, LLC (MIC)
Mangini North Phase 1B Backbone Facilities
Constructed .................................................... B-7 Table B-8 Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC Backbone Facilities
Reimbursement Analysis ................................... B-8 Table B-9 Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC White Rock
Springs Ranch (WRSR) Backbone Facilities
Constructed (3 pages) ...................................... B-9 Table B-10 ECIC Village 3 Reimbursement Agreement
Facilities Constructed (3 pages) ........................ B-12 Table B-11 ECIC Village 5 & 6 Backbone Facilities
Reimbursement Analysis .................................. B-15

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-12 ECIC Village 5 & 6 Backbone Facilities Constructed ................ B-16 Table B-13 Eagle Parcel 61 & 77 Facilities Reimbursement Analysis .......... B-17 Table B-14 Eagle Parcel 61 & 77 Backbone Facilities
Constructed (9 pages) ....................................................... B-18 Table B-15 Eagle Parcel 85 Facilities Reimbursement Analysis ................. B-27 Table B-16 Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC White Rock Springs Ranch (WRSR) Backbone Facilities Constructed (12 pages) .......................... B-28 Table B-17 Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 1 Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis .................................................... B-40 Table B-18 Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Backbone Phase 1 Facilities Constructed (6 pages) .......................................... B-41 Table B-19 Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis .................................................... B-47 Table B-20 Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Backbone
Facilities Constructed (7 pages) .......................................... B-48 Table B-21 CMB Phase 1E Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis ..... B-55 Table B-22 Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC White Rock Springs Ranch (WRSR) Backbone Facilities Constructed .......................................... B-56 Table B-23 Russell Ranch Phase 2 Backbone Facilities
Reimbursement Analysis .................................................... B-57 Table B-24 Russell Ranch Phase 2 Backbone Facilities
Constructed (10 pages) ..................................................... B-58 Table B-25 Russell Ranch Phase 3 Backbone Facilities
Reimbursement Analysis .................................................... B-68 Table B-26 Russell Ranch Phase 3 Backbone Facilities
Constructed (3 pages) ....................................................... B-69 Table B-27 Elliot Homes Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis ....... B-72 Table B-28 Elliot Homes Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis Detail (2 pages) ................................................... B-73 Table B-29 ECIC (Mangini Phase 2 Villages 7 & 10) ................................ B-75 Table B-30 ECIC (Mangini Phase 2 Villages 7 & 10) Detail (2 pages) ......... B-76

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-1
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Summary of Phase 1 Remaining SPIF Infrastructure Costs [1]

SPIF SPIF
TNHC ECIC/Enclave
Item Only Shared [2] Total Total
SPIF Facility Cost Estimate Phase 1 Roadways Rough Grading $2,973,704 $134,198 $3,107,902 $3,107,902 Backbone Roadways $2,353,943 $277,199 $2,631,142 $2,631,142 Railroad Crossings $222,193 $0 $222,193 $222,193
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $147,510 $116,558 $264,068 $264,068 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $434,083 $211,012 $645,095 $645,095 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $54,082 $1,608 $55,690 $55,690 Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $6,185,515 $740,575 $6,926,090 $6,926,090 Dry Utility System $2,187,788 $527,288 $2,715,076 $2,715,076 Potable Water System $8,448,078 $458,513 $8,906,591 $8,906,591 Off-Site Water System (Set-Aside) $0 $0 $0 $0
Recycled Water System $622,536 $171,540 $794,076 $794,076 Sanitary Sewer System
Sewer Pipelines $936,431 $0 $936,431 $936,431
Alder Creek Lift Station (Set-Aside) $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer System $936,431 $0 $936,431 $936,431 Storm Drain System $2,950,632 $817,807 $3,768,439 $3,768,439 Habitat Mitigation $211,118 $0 $211,118 $211,118
Total Phase 1 Costs $21,542,098 $2,715,723 $24,257,821 $24,257,821 ph1 costs remain
Source: SPIF Nexus Study Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; WestLand; TNHC; EPS. [1] Reflects the remaining balance of SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements for Phase 1 SPIF facilities less SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments paid through July 15, 2023, in Fiscal Year 2023-24 dollars.

See Table B-2 through Table B-4 for details.

Phase 1 Reimbursement Agreements (2023$) [1]
[2] Includes approximately $2.7 million in reimbursements that were transferred to UC Davis in September 2021 that have not been converted to fee credits as of August 2023.

Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-1

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-2
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustmen TNHC Only/Lennar Phase 1 Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis Zone 5 Water Tank and Zone 4 and Allocation Russell Ranch Russell Ranch Zone 6 Zone 5 Water Enclave of Remaining Alder Creek Grand Prairie Booster Booster Backbone Habitat Percentage Reimburse.

Item Parkway Road Pump Station Pump Station Infrastructure Mitigation Total of Total Amount SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursement Initial Reimbursement Amount [1] - - - - - - $41,986,506 Remaining Reimbursement Amount [2] - - - - - - $21,542,096 Net Remaining Reimbursement Amount - - - - - - $21,542,096 SPIF Facility Cost Estimate [4]
Phase 1 Roadways Rough Grading $4,667,845 $7,644 $1,035,637 $59,202 $58,176 $0 $5,828,504 13.8% $2,973,704 Backbone Roadways $4,482,660 $50,700 $0 $12,362 $68,040 $0 $4,613,762 10.9% $2,353,943 Railroad Crossings $234,000 $201,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,500 1.0% $222,193 City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $260,520 $28,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $289,120 0.7% $147,510 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $740,649 $0 $0 $0 $110,160 $0 $850,809 2.0% $434,083 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $91,260 $14,742 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,002 0.3% $54,082 Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0 Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $10,476,934 $303,186 $1,035,637 $71,564 $236,376 $0 $12,123,697 28.7% $6,185,515 Dry Utility System $4,041,540 $0 $149,058 $97,500 $0 $0 $4,288,098 10.2% $2,187,788 Potable Water System $2,358,460 $1,015,300 $8,941,400 $4,243,200 $0 $0 $16,558,360 39.2% $8,448,078 Off-Site Water System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Recycled Water System $917,280 $302,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,220,180 2.9% $622,536 Sanitary Sewer System
Sewer Pipelines $1,835,418 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,835,418 4.3% $936,431 Alder Creek Lift Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer System $1,835,418 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,835,418 4.3% $936,431 Storm Drain System $3,862,742 $1,920,542 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,783,284 13.7% $2,950,632 Habitat Mitigation [5] $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $413,795 $413,795 1.0% $211,118 Total Phase 1 Costs $23,492,374 $3,541,928 $10,126,095 $4,412,264 $236,376 $413,795 $42,222,832 100.0% $21,542,098 tnhc reimb Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; MIC; TNHC; EPS. [1] Based on Exhibit D of the TNHC Russell Ranch LLC (TNHC) SPIF Infrastructure Fee Program Fee Reimbursement Agreement. [2] Based on the reimbursement balances for TNHC as of July 15, 2020. TNHC's remaining SPIF Fee reimbursement amounts are detailed in Appendix C. [3] Reflects the allocation of SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments made as of July 15, 2023. [4] Unless otherwise noted, based on the Phase 1 SPIF Infrastructure cost estimates from the SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update, as detailed below.

Russell Ranch Alder Creek Parkway: See Table A-1.

Russell Ranch Grand Prairie Road: See Table A-2.

Zone 5 Water Tank and Zone 6 Booster Pump Station: See Table A-8.

Zone 4 and Zone 5 Water Booster Pump Station: See Table A-9.

Enclave Backbone Infrastructure: See Table A-10.
[5] Reflects the habitat mitigation amount reflected in tables supporting the Exhibit D of the MIC Phase 1 Backbone Facilities SPIF Reimbursement Agreement.

Phase 1 Construction Plan
TNHC Russell Ranch LLC/Lennar
Reimbursement Analysis
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-2

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-3
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment East Carpenter Improvement Company, LLC (ECIC)/Enclave at Folsom Ranch, LLC (Enclave) Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis Allocation
Alder Hydromod. of Remaining
Creek East Westwood Basin Percentage Reimburse.

Item Parkway Bidwell Drive No. 19 Total of Total Amount SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursement
Initial Reimbursement Amount [1] - - - - $10,456,880
Remaining Reimbursement Amount [2] - - - - $2,715,722
Less SPIF Infrastructure Fee Payments - - - - -
Net Remaining Reimbursement Amount - - - - $2,715,722
SPIF Facility Cost Estimate
Phase 1 Roadways
Rough Grading $295,168 $0 $221,561 $0 $516,729 4.9% $134,198 Backbone Roadways $647,855 $218,039 $201,457 $0 $1,067,351 10.2% $277,199 Railroad Crossings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $232,350 $164,234 $52,222 $0 $448,806 4.3% $116,558 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $634,400 $178,101 $0 $0 $812,501 7.8% $211,012 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $0 $6,192 $0 $0 $6,192 0.1% $1,608 Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $1,809,773 $566,566 $475,240 $0 $2,851,579 27.3% $740,575 Dry Utility System $1,052,886 $740,793 $236,642 $0 $2,030,321 19.4% $527,288 Potable Water System $464,700 $1,082,419 $218,383 $0 $1,765,502 16.9% $458,513 Off-Site Water System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Recycled Water System $211,365 $297,232 $151,918 $0 $660,515 6.3% $171,540 Sanitary Sewer System
Sewer Pipelines $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Alder Creek Lift Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Storm Drain System $1,203,513 $1,009,625 $140,772 $795,054 $3,148,964 30.1% $817,807 Habitat Mitigation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Total SPIF Facility Costs [3] $4,742,237 $3,696,635 $1,222,955 $795,054 $10,456,881 100.0% $2,715,722 ecic enclave reimb
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; MIC; TNHC; EPS. [1] Based on a cost-sharing agreement between ECIC and Enclave. Initial reimbursement amounts for each entity shown below.

ECIC - $5,799,132
Enclave - $4,657,748
[2] Based on the reimbursement balances for ECIC and Enclave as of July 15, 2023. Remaining reimbursement amounts for each entity is shown below and detailed in Appendix C.
[3] The Total SPIF Facility Costs may not equal the reimbursement amount due to rounding.

SPIF Facility Construction Plan
ECIC/Enclave
Reimbursement Analysis
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-3

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-4
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustmen Summary of Phase 2 Remaining SPIF Infrastructure Costs [1 ECIC ECIC Eagle Eagle Toll Bros. Toll Bros. CMB Elliot Homes Russell Russell ECIC Ph. 2C Ph. 2C Parcels Parcel Folsom Folsom Ranch Ph. 1E Broadstone & Ranch Ranch White Rock Ph. 2A Item V. 3 V. 5 and 6 61 and 77 85A Phase 1 [3] Phase 2 [3] Zone 4 Tank Phase 2 Phase 3 Springs Ranch Villages 7 & 10 Total SPIF Facility Cost Estimate [2]
Phase 2 Roadways Rough Grading $416,108 $0 $6,116,075 $3,864,292 ($349,185) $4,612,529 $1,864 $0 $963,343 $0 $185,540 $1,577,546 $17,388,112 Backbone Roadways $1,210,609 $0 $6,542,904 $1,447,987 ($1,849,962) $5,785,003 $146,417 $382,007 $3,689,146 $271,076 $400,025 $1,369,677 $19,394,889 Railroad Crossings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,050 City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $0 $0 $59,064 $18,592 ($19,624) $182,432 $18,842 $0 $109,509 $0 $0 $0 $368,815 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $0 $0 $763,891 $1,230,652 ($109,625) $1,020,660 $168,163 $0 $1,027,333 $0 $0 $979,341 $5,080,415 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $0 $0 $0 $0 ($4,646) $24,064 $0 $0 $99,917 $0 $0 $0 $119,335 Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Class 1 Trail $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $331,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $331,853 Subtotal Phase 2 Roadways $1,626,717 $0 $13,481,934 $6,561,523 ($2,333,042) $11,956,541 $335,286 $597,057 $5,889,248 $271,076 $585,565 $3,926,564 $42,898,469 Dry Utility System $548,831 $0 $1,574,525 $847,616 ($235,289) $2,177,660 $0 $0 $1,314,950 $0 $0 $663,877 $6,892,170 Potable Water System $885,311 $0 $1,397,883 $1,441,019 ($238,836) $2,580,588 $0 $1,393,128 $799,232 $528,246 $68,225 $578,201 $9,432,997 Off-Site Water System (Set-Aside) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Recycled Water System $824,068 $0 $1,254,275 $870,135 ($79,103) $1,511,967 $0 $0 $288,387 $0 $49,000 $0 $4,718,729 Sanitary Sewer System $0 $0 $2,704,043 $115,604 ($90,812) $288,225 $0 $0 $3,067,185 $364,493 $0 $370,048 $6,818,786 Storm Drain System $687,626 $0 $3,448,155 $3,552,141 ($737,473) $5,802,951 $209,064 $0 $5,602,786 $107,484 $28,230 $1,056,660 $19,757,624 Habitat Mitigation $0 $0 $554,622 $701,561 ($35,115) $93,119 $0 $0 $395,718 $0 $0 $0 $1,709,905 Total Phase 2 Costs $4,572,553 $0 $24,415,437 $14,089,599 ($3,749,670) $24,411,051 $544,350 $1,990,185 $17,357,506 $1,271,299 $731,020 $6,595,350 $92,228,680 p2 sum
Source: SPIF Nexus Study Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; WestLand; TNHC; EPS. [2] Reflects the costs associated with facilities funded by the SPIF Set-Aside Fee. [3] This agreement carries a negative balance, as the landowner converted more reimbursements to fee credits than they incurred in SPIF-eligible construction costs. [1] Reflects the remaining balance of SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursements for Phase 2 SPIF facilities less SPIF Infrastructure Fee payments paid through July 15, 2023, in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 dollars.

See Table B-5 through Table B-30 for details.

Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreements (2023$) [1]
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-4

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-5
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustmen Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreements True-Up/ Make-Up Adjustments ECIC ECIC Eagle Eagle Toll Bros. Toll Bros. CMB Elliot Homes Russell Russell ECIC Ph. 2C Ph. 2C Parcels Parcel Folsom Folsom Ph. 1E Broadstone & Ranch Ranch Ph. 2A Item Formula V. 3 [3] V. 5 and 6 [3] 61 and 77 85A Ranch Ph 1. Ranch Ph 2. [3] Zone 4 Tank Phase 2 Phase 3 Villages 7 & 10 [3] Initial Agreement Amount a $4,722,965 $338,940 $15,922,750 $8,111,345 $24,638,648 $24,411,051 $2,124,624 $1,097,145 $17,357,506 $1,271,299 $3,885,683 Agreement Year 22/23 22/23 21/22 21/22 21/22 23/24 22/23 22/23 23/24 23/24 20/21 CCI Escalation Factor (to adjust to 2023 $) b 8.87% 8.87% 14.91% 14.91% 14.91% 0.00% 8.87% 8.87% 0.00% 0.00% 18.71% CCI Escalated Agreement Amount c = a x (1 + b) $5,141,892 $369,004 $18,295,462 $9,320,681 $28,312,071 $24,411,051 $2,313,078 $1,194,462 $17,357,506 $1,271,299 $3,885,683 Construction Make-Up/ True Up Amount [1] d $5,141,892 $369,004 $24,415,437 $14,275,032 $24,320,954 $24,411,051 $2,313,078 $1,990,185 $17,357,506 $1,271,299 $3,885,683 Adjustment Factor e = d - c $0 $0 $6,119,975 $4,954,351 ($3,991,117) $0 $0 $795,723 $0 $0 $0 Remaining Balance (CCI Escalated) [2] f $4,572,552 $369,004 $18,295,462 $9,135,248 $241,447 $24,411,051 $544,350 $1,194,462 $17,357,506 $1,271,299 $6,595,350 Remaining Balance (Make-Up/ True Up Adjusted) g = e + f $4,572,552 $369,004 $24,415,437 $14,089,599 ($3,749,670) $24,411,051 $544,350 $1,990,185 $17,357,506 $1,271,299 $6,595,350 [1] Reflects actual costs incurred by landowners for backbone improvements. [2] From reimbursement tracking logs for each outstanding reimbursement agreement as of July 2, 2023. See Appendix C.

Phase 2 Reimbursement Agreements
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-5

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-6
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment ECIC Village 3 Reimbursement Agreement
Allocation
of Remaining
Savannah Placerville Percentage Reimburse.

Item Parkway Road Total of Total Amount
SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursement
Initial Reimbursement Amount - - $4,722,965
Remaining Reimbursement Amount [1] - - $4,572,552
Less SPIF Infrastructure Fee Payments - - $0
Net Remaining Reimbursement Amount - - $4,572,552
SPIF Facility Cost Estimate [2]
Phase 1 Roadways
Rough Grading $467,919 $0 $467,919 9.1% $416,108
Backbone Roadways $1,361,345 $0 $1,361,345 26.5% $1,210,609 Railroad Crossings $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $1,829,264 $0 $1,829,264 35.6% $1,626,717 Dry Utility System $617,167 $0 $617,167 12.0% $548,831
Potable Water System $995,543 $0 $995,543 19.4% $885,311 Off-Site Water System $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Recycled Water System 0 $926,675 $926,675 18.0% $824,068 Sanitary Sewer System $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Storm Drain System $773,244 $0 $773,244 15.0% $687,626
Habitat Mitigation $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Total Phase 2 Costs $4,215,218 $926,675 $5,141,893 100.0% $4,572,553 mic tnhc
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update; MacKay & Somps; ECIC; EPS. [1] Remaining reimbursement amount current as of July 15, 2023.

ECIC Village 3
Reimbursement Analysis
Phase 2 Construction Plan
[2] Unless otherwise noted, based on the SPIF Infrastructure cost estimates from the SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update, escalated to FY 2023-24 dollars.

Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-6

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-7
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Mangini Improvement Company, LLC (MIC) Mangini North Phase 1B Backbone Facilities Constructed Percentage SPIF Escalated SMUD Engineering/
of Facility Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract Plan Check/ SPIF Improvement Constructed Construction Escalation Cost Cost [1] Inspection Contingency Total Assumption 5.85% 50% 20% 10%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F Backbone Infrastructure Roadways - Signalized Intersections & Improvements Intersection No. 13 - E. Bidwell St./Mangini Pkwy.

Item 11 Traffic Signals 100% $300,000 $17,555 $317,555 $0 $63,511 $31,756 $412,821 Storm Drain
Hydro-Modification Basin No. 22 100% $641,970 $37,566 $679,536 $0 $135,907 $67,954 $883,397 Total Facilities $941,970 $55,121 $997,091 $0 $199,418 $99,709 $1,296,218 mic 1b detail
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; MIC; EPS. [1] Reflects the estimated cost SMUD will charge for the installation of backbone electrical conductors. [2] Estimate does not include costs for the traffic signals.

SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update Costs
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-7

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-8
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis Allocation
Hydromod. of Remaining
Mangini Savannah Detention Basin Percentage Reimburse.

Item Parkway Parkway Basin No. 8 No. 24 Total of Total Amount SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursement
Initial Reimbursement Amount [1] - - - - $10,999,824
Remaining Reimbursement Amount [2] - - - - $0
Less SPIF Infrastructure Fee Payments - - - - -
Net Remaining Reimbursement Amount - - - - $0
SPIF Facility Cost Estimate [3]
Phase 1 Roadways
Rough Grading $930,760 $0 $0 $0 $930,760 11.6% $0
Backbone Roadways $1,200,191 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,191 15.0% $0 Railroad Crossings $206,408 $0 $0 $0 $206,408 2.6% $0
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $196,412 $0 $0 $0 $196,412 2.4% $0 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $82,976 $0 $0 $0 $82,976 1.0% $0 Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $2,616,747 $0 $0 $0 $2,616,747 32.6% $0 Dry Utility System $1,080,305 $0 $0 $0 $1,080,305 13.5% $0 Potable Water System $207,371 $0 $0 $0 $207,371 2.6% $0 Off-Site Water System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Recycled Water System $286,219 $0 $0 $0 $286,219 3.6% $0 Sanitary Sewer System
Sewer Pipelines $189,895 $0 $0 $0 $189,895 2.4% $0
Alder Creek Lift Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer System $189,895 $0 $0 $0 $189,895 2.4% $0 Storm Drain System $950,987 $1,058,458 $702,611 $933,223 $3,645,279 45.4% $0 Habitat Mitigation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Total SPIF Facility Costs [4] $5,331,524 $1,058,458 $702,611 $933,223 $8,025,816 100.0% $0 wrsr reimb
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC; EPS. [1] Based on Exhibit D of the Gragg Ranch Recovery, LLC (Gragg) White Rock Springs Ranch (WRSR) SPIF Infrastructure Fee Program Fee Reimbursement Agreement.
[2] Based on the reimbursement balances for MIC as of July 15, 2020. Remaining reimbursement amounts for each entity is detailed in Appendix C. [3] See Table B-9 for details.
[4] The Total SPIF Facility Costs may not equal the reimbursement amount due to rounding.

Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC
Reimbursement Analysis
SPIF Facility Construction Plan
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-8

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-9
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC White Rock Springs Ranch (WRSR) Backbone Facilities Constructed Percentage SPIF Escalated SMUD Engineering/
of Facility Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract Plan Check/ SPIF Improvement Constructed Construction Escalation Cost Cost [1] Inspection Contingency Total Assumption 5.85% 50% 20% 10%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F Backbone Roadway Rough Grading
Mangini Parkway
MP 8-GD Clearing 100.0% $15,900 $930 $16,830 $0 $3,366 $1,683 $21,879 MP 8-GD Rough Grade 100.0% $581,000 $33,989 $614,989 $0 $122,998 $61,499 $799,485 MP 8-GD Erosion Control 100.0% $79,500 $4,651 $84,151 $0 $16,830 $8,415 $109,396 Subtotal Alder Creek Parkway $676,400 $39,569 $715,969 $0 $143,194 $71,597 $930,760 Backbone Roadways
Mangini Parkway
MP 8 Mangini Parkway 79.1% $872,200 $51,024 $923,224 $0 $184,645 $92,322 $1,200,191 Railroad Crossings
Mangini Parkway
At-Grade Railroad Crossing (Mangini Parkway; MP 7-8) 25.0% $150,000 $8,775 $158,775 $0 $31,755 $15,878 $206,408 Open Space Vehicular Barrier Mangini Parkway
MP 8 Mangini Parkway 100.0% $60,300 $3,528 $63,828 $0 $12,766 $6,383 $82,976 Signalized Intersections & Improvements Mangini Parkway Intersection No. 14 [2] Mangini Parkway/Savannah Parkway 13.8% $142,736 $8,350 $151,086 $0 $30,217 $15,109 $196,412 SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update Costs
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-9

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-9
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC White Rock Springs Ranch (WRSR) Backbone Facilities Constructed Percentage SPIF Escalated SMUD Engineering/
of Facility Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract Plan Check/ SPIF Improvement Constructed Construction Escalation Cost Cost [1] Inspection Contingency Total Assumption 5.85% 50% 20% 10%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update Costs Dry Utilities Mangini Parkway
MP 8-DU Mangini Parkway 100.0% $567,000 $33,170 $600,170 $300,085 $120,034 $60,017 $1,080,305 Potable Water Mangini Parkway
MP 8-W Mangini Parkway 100.0% $150,700 $8,816 $159,516 $0 $31,903 $15,952 $207,371 Non-Potable Water Mangini Parkway
MP 8-NP Zone 5 100.0% $92,000 $5,382 $97,382 $0 $19,476 $9,738 $126,597 MP 8-NP Zone 6 100.0% $116,000 $6,786 $122,786 $0 $24,557 $12,279 $159,622 Subtotal Mangini Parkway $208,000 $12,168 $220,168 $0 $44,034 $22,017 $286,219 Subtotal Non-Potable Water $208,000 $12,168 $220,168 $0 $44,034 $22,017 $286,219 Sanitary Sewer System
Sewer Pipelines - Mangini Parkway
MP 8-SS Mangini Parkway - 8" 100.0% $138,000 $8,073 $146,073 $0 $29,215 $14,607 $189,895 Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-10

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-9
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Gragg Ranch Recovery LLC White Rock Springs Ranch (WRSR) Backbone Facilities Constructed Percentage SPIF Escalated SMUD Engineering/
of Facility Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract Plan Check/ SPIF Improvement Constructed Construction Escalation Cost Cost [1] Inspection Contingency Total Assumption 5.85% 50% 20% 10%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update Costs Storm Drain
Pipelines - Mangini Parkway
MP 8-SD Mangini Parkway - 60" 100.0% $126,000 $7,371 $133,371 $0 $26,674 $13,337 $173,382 MP 8-SD Mangini Parkway - 48" 100.0% $198,400 $11,606 $210,006 $0 $42,001 $21,001 $273,008 MP 8-SD Mangini Parkway - 24" 100.0% $287,500 $16,819 $304,319 $0 $60,864 $30,432 $395,614 MP 8-SD Mangini Parkway - 15" 100.0% $46,800 $2,738 $49,538 $0 $9,908 $4,954 $64,399 MP 8-SD Mangini Parkway - 12" 100.0% $32,400 $1,895 $34,295 $0 $6,859 $3,430 $44,584 Subtotal Mangini Parkway $691,100 $40,429 $731,529 $0 $146,306 $73,153 $950,987 Pipelines - Savannah Parkway
SP 1-SD Savannah Parkway - 60" 29.3% $163,800 $9,582 $173,382 $0 $34,676 $17,338 $225,397 SP 1-SD 60" Storm Drain Outfall Structure to HMB #24 100.0% $30,000 $1,755 $31,755 $0 $6,351 $3,176 $41,282 SP 1-SD 60" Storm Drain Pipe Extended to HMB #244 100.0% $575,400 $33,661 $609,061 $0 $121,812 $60,906 $791,779 Subtotal Savannah Parkway $769,200 $44,998 $814,198 $0 $162,840 $81,420 $1,058,458 Detention Basins DB 8 Detention Basin No. 8 100.0% $510,600 $29,870 $540,470 $0 $108,094 $54,047 $702,611 HMB 24 Hydromodification Basin No. 24 100.0% $678,190 $39,674 $717,864 $0 $143,573 $71,786 $933,223 Subtotal Detention Basins $1,188,790 $69,544 $1,258,334 $0 $251,667 $125,833 $1,635,834 Subtotal Storm Drain $2,649,090 $154,972 $2,804,062 $0 $560,812 $280,406 $3,645,279 Total Facilities $5,614,426 $328,444 $5,942,870 $300,085 $1,188,574 $594,287 $8,025,816 wrsr detail
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2017-2018 Update; MacKay & Somps; WRSR; EPS. [1] Reflects the estimated cost SMUD will charge for the installation of backbone electrical conductors. [2] Estimate does not include costs for the traffic signals.

Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-11

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-10
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment ECIC Village 3 Reimbursement Agreement Facilities Constructed SPIF Escalated SMUD
Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract
SPIF Improvement Construction Escalation Cost Cost [2] Soft Costs Contingency Total Assumption 8.87% 50% 15% 20%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F Backbone Roadway Rough Grading
Savannah Parkway
SP 3-GD Savannah Pkwy Clearing (Phase 2C) $8,892 $789 $9,681 $0 $1,452 $1,936 $13,069 SP 3-GD Savannah Pkwy Rough Grade (Phase 2C) $265,015 $23,507 $288,522 $0 $43,278 $57,704 $389,505 SP 3-GD Savannah Pkwy Erosion Control (Phase 2C) $44,460 $3,944 $48,403 $0 $7,261 $9,681 $65,345 Subtotal Savannah Parkway $318,367 $28,239 $346,606 $0 $51,991 $69,321 $467,919 Backbone Roadways Savannah Parkway
SP 3 Savannah Parkway (phase 2C) $926,245 $82,158 $1,008,403 $0 $151,261 $201,681 $1,361,345 Subtotal Savannah Parkway $926,245 $82,158 $1,008,403 $0 $151,261 $201,681 $1,361,345 SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update Costs [1]
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-12

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-10
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment ECIC Village 3 Reimbursement Agreement Facilities Constructed SPIF Escalated SMUD
Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract
SPIF Improvement Construction Escalation Cost Cost [2] Soft Costs Contingency Total Assumption 8.87% 50% 15% 20%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update Costs [1]
Dry Utilities Savannah Parkway
SP 3-DU Savannah Pkwy $306,424 $27,180 $333,604 $166,802 $50,041 $66,721 $617,167 Subtotal Savannah Parkway $306,424 $27,180 $333,604 $166,802 $50,041 $66,721 $617,167 Potable Water
Savannah Parkway
SP 3-W Savannah Pkwy - 16" Zone 4 $209,658 $18,597 $228,255 $0 $34,238 $45,651 $308,144 SP 3-W Savannah Pkwy - 24" Zone 3 $467,699 $41,485 $509,184 $0 $76,378 $101,837 $687,399 Subtotal Savannah Parkway $677,358 $60,082 $737,439 $0 $110,616 $147,488 $995,543 Non-Potable Water
Placerville Road
PRC 3 - NP Placerville Road - 12" $395,561 $35,086 $430,648 $0 $64,597 $86,130 $581,374 PRC 3 - NP Placerville Road - 12" $234,939 $20,839 $255,779 $0 $38,367 $51,156 $345,301 Subtotal Placerville Road
Subtotal Non-Potable Water $630,501 $55,925 $686,426 $0 $102,964 $137,285 $926,675 Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-13

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-10
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment ECIC Village 3 Reimbursement Agreement Facilities Constructed SPIF Escalated SMUD
Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract
SPIF Improvement Construction Escalation Cost Cost [2] Soft Costs Contingency Total Assumption 8.87% 50% 15% 20%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update Costs [1]
Storm Drain
Savannah Parkway
SP 3-SD Savannah Pkwy - 24" SD $424,983 $37,696 $462,679 $0 $69,402 $92,536 $624,617 SP 3-SD Savannah Pkwy - 36" SD $101,124 $8,970 $110,094 $0 $16,514 $22,019 $148,627 Subtotal Savannah Parkway $526,107 $46,666 $572,773 $0 $85,916 $114,555 $773,244 Total Facilities $3,385,002 $300,250 $3,685,252 $166,802 $552,788 $737,050 $5,141,893 wrsr detail
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update; MacKay & Somps; ECIC; EPS. [1] Costs provided to EPS were escalated to FY 2022/23. [2] Reflects the estimated cost SMUD will charge for the installation of backbone electrical conductors.

Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-14

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-11
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment ECIC Village 5 & 6 Backbone Facilities Reimbursement Analysis Allocation
Alder of Remaining
Creek Percentage Reimburse.

Item Parkway Total of Total Amount
SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursement
Initial Reimbursement Amount - $369,004
Remaining Reimbursement Amount [1] - $0
Less SPIF Infrastructure Fee Payments - $0
Net Remaining Reimbursement Amount - $0
SPIF Facility Cost Estimate [2]
Phase 1 Roadways
Rough Grading $0 $0 0.0% $0
Backbone Roadways $369,004 $369,004 100.0% $0
Railroad Crossings $0 $0 0.0% $0
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $0 $0 0.0% $0 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $0 $0 0.0% $0
Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $0 $0 0.0% $0
Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $369,004 $369,004 100.0% $0
Dry Utility System $0 $0 0.0% $0
Potable Water System $0 $0 0.0% $0
Off-Site Water System $0 $0 0.0% $0
Recycled Water System $0 $0 0.0% $0
Sanitary Sewer System $0 $0 0.0% $0
Storm Drain System $0 $0 0.0% $0
Habitat Mitigation $0 $0 0.0% $0
Total Phase 2 Costs $369,004 $369,004 100.0% $0
mic tnhc
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update; MacKay & Somps; ECIC; EPS. [1] Remaining reimbursement amount current as of July 15, 2023.

ECIC Village 5 & 6
Reimbursement Analysis
Phase 2 Construction Plan
[2] Unless otherwise noted, based on the SPIF Infrastructure cost estimates from the SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update, escalated to FY 2023-24 dollars.

Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-15

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-12
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment ECIC Village 5 & 6 Backbone Facilities Constructed
SPIF Escalated SMUD
Nexus Study SPIF Construction Contract
SPIF Improvement Construction Escalation Cost Cost [2] Soft Costs Contingency Total Assumption 8.87% 50% 15% 20%
Formula A B C = A+B D = C*50% E = C*20% F = C*10% G = C+D+E+F Backbone Roadways
Alder Creek Parkway
ACP 8 Alder Creek Parkway $251,067 $22,270 $273,337 $0 $41,000 $54,667 $369,004 Total Facilities $251,067 $22,270 $273,337 $0 $41,000 $54,667 $369,004 wrsr detail
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update; MacKay & Somps; ECIC; EPS. [1] Costs provided to EPS were escalated to FY 2022/23. [2] Reflects the estimated cost SMUD will charge for the installation of backbone electrical conductors.

SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update Costs [1]
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-16

11/14/2023 Item No.10.

Table B-13
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF) 2023 Adjustment Eagle Parcel 61 & 77 Facilities Reimbursement Analysis
Alder Creek
Parkway Allocation
Alder East of Remaining
Creek Bidwell Percentage Reimburse.

Item Parkway Street Total of Total Amount
SPIF Infrastructure Fee Reimbursement
Initial Reimbursement Amount - - $15,922,750
Remaining Reimbursement Amount [1] - - $24,415,437
Less SPIF Infrastructure Fee Payments - - $0
Net Remaining Reimbursement Amount - - $24,415,437
SPIF Facility Cost Estimate [4]
Phase 1 Roadways
Rough Grading $6,009,379 $106,696 $6,116,075 25.1% $6,116,075 Backbone Roadways $6,205,724 $337,180 $6,542,904 26.8% $6,542,904 Railroad Crossings $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
City Fiber Optic & Traffic Control System $59,064 $0 $59,064 0.2% $59,064 Signalized Intersections & Improvements $763,891 $0 $763,891 3.1% $763,891 Open Space Vehicular Access Barrier $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Off-Site Roadway Improvements $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Subtotal Phase 1 Roadways $13,038,058 $443,876 $13,481,934 55.2% $13,481,934 Dry Utility System $1,574,525 $0 $1,574,525 6.4% $1,574,525 Potable Water System $1,230,075 $167,808 $1,397,883 5.7% $1,397,883 Off-Site Water System $0 $0 $0 0.0% $0
Recycled Water System $1,254,275 $0 $1,254,275 5.1% $1,254,275 Sanitary Sewer System $2,704,043 $0 $2,704,043 11.1% $2,704,043 Storm Drain System $3,412,574 $35,581 $3,448,155 14.1% $3,448,155 Habitat Mitigation [5] $554,622 $0 $554,622 2.3% $554,622 Total Phase 2 Costs $23,768,172 $647,265 $24,415,437 100.0% $24,415,437 mic tnhc
Source: SPIF Nexus Study FY 2019-2020 Update; MacKay & Somps; Eagle Commercial Properties; EPS. [1] Remaining reimbursement amount current as of July 15, 2023.

Eagle Parcel 61 & 77 Backbone Facilities
Reimbursement Analysis
Phase 2 Construction Plan
Prepared by EPS 11/2/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\142000\142079 Folsom SPIF Implementation\23 SPIF Update\Model\142079 SPIF Update m02 09-27-2023.xlsx B-17