Agenda packet — Folsom City Council, October 8, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

Page 131 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

Monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements, and the following elements:
. ecological performance standards, based on the best available science, that can be assessed in a practicable manner (e.g., performance standards proposed by Barbour et al. 2007). Performance standards must be based on attributes that are objective and verifiable; . assessments conducted annually for 5 years after construction or restoration of compensatory wetlands to determine whether these areas are acquiring wetland functions and to plot the performance trajectory of preserved, restored, or created wetlands over time.
. assessments results for compensatory wetlands shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
r assessments analysis conducted annually for 5 years after any construction adjacent to wetlands preserved on the SPA to determine whether these ireas are retaining functions and values. Assessments iesults for wetlands preserved on site shatl also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
. analysis of assessments data, including assessment of potential stressors, to determine whether any remedial activities may be necessary;
. corrective measures if performance standards are not mst; . monitoring of plant communities as performance critena (annual measure of success, during monitoring period) and success criteria (indicative of achievement of mitigation habitat requirement at end of monitoring period) for hydrologic function have become established and the creation site "matures" over time;
. GIS analysis of compensatory wetlands to demonstrate actual acreage of functioning wetland habitat; I adaptive management measures to be applied if performance standards and acreage requirements are not being met;
. responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and t responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifuing success or prescribing implementation or conective actions.

A final operations and management plan (OMP) for all on- and off-site permittee-sponsored wetland preservation and mitigation areas shall be prepared and submitted to USACE and USFWS for review, iomment and preliminary approval pnor to the issuance ofany permits under Section 404 ofthe CWA. The plan shall include detailed information on the habitats present wittrin the preservation and mitigation areas, ihe long-term management and monitoring of these habitats, legal protection for the preservation and mitigation areas (e.g., conservatton easement, declaration ofrestrictions), and funding mechanism information (e.g., endowment). A final OMP for each discretionary development entitlement affecfing wetlands must be approved prior to construction.

Resolutron No. 10670

Page 69 of 141 ends

Page 132 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

California
Department of
Fish and Game
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department.

Before the
approval of
grading and
improvement
plans, before
any ground
disturbing
activities, and
during project
construction as
applicable for
all project
phases.
certification shall be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developecl by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans, El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson's Hawk and Other Raptor Nests' To mitigate impacts on Swainson's hawk and other raptors (including bunowing owl), the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified biotogisfto conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of t|e SPA and aclive bunows on the SPA. The surveys shall be conducted before the approval of grading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construition for a[ project phases. To the extent feasible, guidelines provided in Recommended timing and Ir,tethodology for Swainson's Hawk Nesting Surveys in the Central Valley (Swainson's Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000) shall be followed for surveys for Swainson's hawk, If no nests are found, no further mitigation is required.

34.3-2a
(FPASP
f,rwErs)
106
-14
Resolution No. 10670

Page 70 of 141 ends

Page 133 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of
grading,
improvement,
or constructlon
plans and
before any
ground
dishrbing
activity in any
project
development
phase that
would affect
Swainson's
hawk foraging
habitat.
likely t0 nest. ofthe nest by a and after
construction activities will be required if the activity has to adversely affect the nest.

If active bunows are found, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-distrubing activities.

The City shall consult with DFG. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors on all bunowi to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial bunows within the project vicinity, as needed; however, burrow owl exclusions may only be used if a qualified biologist verifies that the bunow does not contain eggs or dependent young. Ifactive bunows contain eggs and/or young, no construction shall occur wiihin 50 feet of the bunow until young have fledged. Once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside burrows, these burrows may be collapsed.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable prqect phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans), such that the performance criteria set forth in DFG's guidelines are determined to be met.

Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2b: Prepare and Implement a swainson's Hawk Mitigation Plan.

To mitigate for ttre loss of Swainson's hawk foraging habitat, the pro1ect applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare-and implement a Swainson's hawk mitrgation plan including, but not limited to the requirements described below.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first, ihe project apptican(s) shall preserve, to the satisfaction of the City or Sacramento County, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdictio4 suitable Swainson's hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1: I niltigition of habitat value for Swainson's hawk foraging habitat lost as a result ofthe project, as determined by the City, or Sacramento County, after consultation with DFG and a qualified biologist The I : i habitat value shall be based on Swainson's hawk nesting distnbution and an assessment of habitat quality, availability, and use within the city's planning area, or Sacramento County jurisdiction The mitigition ratio shall be consistent with the 1994 DFG Swainson's Hawk Guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson's Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of Caiifomia, whicli call for the following mitigation ratios for loss of foraging habitat in these categories: 1 :1 if within 1 mile of an active nest site, 0.75:l if over I mile but less than 5 miles, and 0.5:1 if over 5 miles but less than 10 miles from an active nest site. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through credit purchase from an established mitigation bank approved to sell Swainson's hawk foraging habitat credits to mitigate losses in the SPA, if available, or tlrough the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento County. The City, or Sacramento County if outside City jurisdiction, after consultation with DFG, will determine the appropnateness of the mitigation land.
3A.3-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-15
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 71 of 141 ends

Page 134 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
-Before
approval of such proposed mitigation, the City, or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin, shall consult with DFG regarding the appropriateness of the mitigation. Ifmitigation is accomplished through conservation easement, then such an easement shall ensure the continued management of the land to maintain Swainson's hawk foraging values, including but not limited to ongoing agriculhral uses and the maintenance of all existing water rights associated with the land. The conservation easement shall be recordable and shall prohibit any ictivity that substantially impairs or diminishes the land's capacity as suitable Swainson's hawk habitat.

The prqect applicant(s) shall transfer said Swainson's hawk mitigation land, through either conservation easement or feb title, to a third party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and DFG named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation organization that meets the critena of Civil Code Section 815.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City or County, after consultation with DFG. The City, or County, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form of the conservation easement. The City, or County, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms ofthe easement.

The project applican(s), after consultation with the City, or County ofjwisdiction, DFG, and the ConiervationOperator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement ofthe conservation easement.

If an endowmeni is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City's junsdiction or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin to be distributed to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nbnpiofit conservition agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity.

The-Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest of any conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior wntten approval of the City and DFG. Mitigation lands established or aCquired for impacts incuned at the off-site detention basin shall require approval from Sacramento County prior to sale or transfer ofmitigation lands or conservation easement.

If the Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transfined to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG, or Sacramento County and DFG depending on jurisdiction of the affected habitat. The City Planning Department shail ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City's planning area is properly established and is functioning as habitat by reviewing regular monitoring reports prepared by the Conservation Operator ofthe mitigationiite(s). Monitoring ofthe mitigation site(s) shall continue for the first 10 years after establishmint of the easement and shall be funded through the endowment, or other appropriate funding mechanism, established by the project applicant(s). Sacramento County shall review the monitonng reports for impacts on habitat at the off-site detention basin.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 72 of 141 ends

Page 135 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was venfied pnor
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of any
ground-
disturbing
activity within
500 feet of
suitable nesting
habitat as
applicable for
all project
phases.

Before the
approval of any
ground-
disnrbing
activity within
500 feet of
suitable nesting
habitat as
applicable for
all project
phases.
coordinated
agency(ies)
elements outside of the City boundaries must be
by the project applican(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight (i.e., Sacramento County and Caltrans).
performance criteria described above.

The survey shall be conducted within 14 days before project activity begins.

If no tricolored blackbird colony is present, no further mitigation is required. If a colony is found, the qualified biologist shall establish a buffer around the nesting colony. No proJect activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active. The size ofthe buffer shall be determined in consultration with DFG. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature ofthe project activity, the extent ofexisting disturbance in the area, and other relevant circumstances.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundanes (i.e., U.S, 50 interihange improvements) must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans) and must be sufficient to achieve the Avoid and Minimize to Special-Status Bat Roosts. The project applicant of all project phases containing potential bat roosting habitat
Surveys shall be conducted in the fall to
shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for roosting bats. determine if the mine shaft is used as a hibemaculum and in spring and/or summer to determine if it is used as
emergence surveys to note the presence or
emergence. If evidence of bat use is observed, the number and species ofbats determined. Bat detectors may be used to supplement swvey efforts. Ifno bat further study shall be required.
using the roost shall be
if roosts of pallid bat or Townsend's big+ared bats are determined to be present and must be removed, the bats shall be excluded from the roosting site. A mitigation program addressing compensation, exclusion methods, and roost removal procedures shall be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation.

Exclusion methods may include use of one-way doors at roost entrances (bats may leave but not resnter), or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be restricted during periods of sensitive activity (e.g., during hibemation or while females in maternity colonies are nursingyoung). The loss of each roost (if any) will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction ind installation of bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the orisinal a maternity or day roost. Surveys shall consist ofevening absence ofbats and could consist ofvisual surveys at the time of roosts are found, then no
3A.3-2c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.3-2d
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
r06
-16
106
-17
Resolution No. 10670
Page73 of 141

Page 136 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
Distric! U.S.

Fish and
Wildlife
Service; and
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of any
grading or
improvement
plans, before
any ground
disturbing
activities within
250 feet of said
habitat or lesser
distance
deemed
sufficiently
protective by a
qualified
biologist with
approval from
USFWS, and on
a.n ongoing
basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for
all project
phases as
required by the
mitigation plan,
BO, and/or
BMPs.
roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.

Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Inverlebrates and Implement All Permit Conditions. No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for Federally listed vemal pool invertebrates, or within adequate buffer areas (250 feet or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS), until a biological opinion (BO) or Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) letter has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development entitlements affecting such areas have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site construction.

Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation describing methods to protect existing vemal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 34.3-1a, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss ofvernal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation ofhabitat, account for the temporal loss of habitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards are not mel
The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vemal poolha6itat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss of acreage, function, ind value ofaffected vernal pool habitat. The final habitat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of 404 Permits for Projects with Relatively Small Effects on Listid Vemal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction of the Sacramento Field Office, California (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an alternative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss ofhabitatacreage, function, and value.

The project applicant(s) for any particutar discretionary development application "potentially affecting vernal pool habitat" shall ensure that there is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and iestoration of vemal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health. This standard shall be accomplished by requiring the project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application affecting vemal pool or seasonal wetland habitat to identify the extent of indirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identifuing all such habitat within 250 feet of project construction activities or by providing an alternative technical evaluation. If a lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage ofvemal pool habitat for each wetted acre ofany indirectly affected vernal pool habitat at a ratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion ofthe Section 7 consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet ofthe habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist witlt aooroval from USFWS. The proiect applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for 343-29
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-18
Resolution No. 1 0670
Page74of141

Page 137 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The City
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

California
Deparftnent of
Fish and Game
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before
approval of
grading or
improvement
plans or any
construction
activities
(including
clearing and
grubbing) that
affect the bed
and bank or
riparian and
freshwater
marsh habitat
associated with
Alder Creek
and other on-
site or off-site
drainage
channels and
ponds.
direct or indirect impacts
or mitigation plan (i.e., if
mitigated to the another BO
impacts on specific habitat acreage are mitigated by one proJ phase of
ect phase or element,
the project applicant(s) will not be required to mitigate for it agarn ln another the project).

A standard set of BMPs shall be applied to conshuction occuning in areas within 250 feet of off-site vemal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologtst (with approval from USpWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat, Refer to Section 3A.9, "Hydrolory and Water Quality - Land" for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundanes must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ie$ (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans) > compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mrtigation sites; > complete assessment ofthe existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
> site-specific management procedures to benefit establishment and maintenance ofnative nparian plant species, including black willow, anoyo willow, white alder, and Fremont cottonwood; > a planting and inigation program if needed for establishment ofnatiVe riparian trees and shrubs at strategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and inigation may not be necessary if preservation of functioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or ifrestoration can be accomplished without inigation or planting);
> in kind reference habitats for comparison with compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and success criteria) to document success;
(FPASP
ErwErs)
r06
-19
Resolution No. 10670

Page 75 of 141 ends

Page 138 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
venfied compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of gading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.
> montoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be monitored for a minimum period of five years); > ecological performance standards, based on the best available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount of dead woody vegetation gaps and bare ground, and survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation planting sites must achieve 80% survival of planted riparian trees and shrubs by the end of the five-year maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
> corrective measures ifperformance standards are not met; > responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and > responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or conective actions.

Any conditions of issuance ofthe Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be implemented as part ofproject construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site drainage channels under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and riparian habitat.

Mitigation for the
applicable project
U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each phase with the Caltrans.

Cotrduct Surveys to Identify rnd Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine ifvalley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concurrently wth any special-status plant surveys conducted on site is special-status plant surveys are floristic in nature, i.e, require that all species encountered be identified, and require preparation of a plant community map. If valley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the boianisfshall document ihe findings in a letter report to the City of Folsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any of the off+ite project elements.

If valley needlegass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent ofthe community shall be mapped and the acreage ofthis community type, ifany, that would.be removed by project implementation shali be calculated. The prqect applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting valtey needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City ofFolsom to determine appropriate mrtrgation for removal of valley needlegass grassland resulting from project implementation.

Mitigation measures shall include one or more of the following components sufficient to achieve no net loss ofvallev needlesrass srassland acreage: establishment ofvalley needlegrass grassland within projecl's open 3A.3-4b
(FPASP
ErRyErs)
106
-20
ResolutionNo. 10670
Page76 of l4l

Page 139 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The obtained a Tree
Permit from the Community
Development Department for the
removal ofprotected oak trees that
were impacted by the grading and
consfiuction ofPhase 3 ofthe Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch project.

The Tree Permit was approved Prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.

The owner/applicant paid inJieu
fees for the removal of some trees,
the Crty approved a Tree
Replacement Plan for another
portion of the tree that were removed
and preserved existing oak trees in
El Dorado County for the remaining
mitigation for the total number of
protected hees in accordance with
this condition.

The Conservation Easements within the
Phase 3 portion ofthe subdivision were
fenced offaround their boundaries in
advance ofthe commencement of
grading and construction and the City
verified compliance by inspecting the
fence in advance of gading.

SPA, The
woodland habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculaied as the oak tree canopy area within stands of oak trees having greater than 10% cover plus a 30-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge ofthe tree canopy. Oak trees located in areas greater than 30 feet from stands meeting the greater than l0% tree canopy coveicriterion were considered isolated trees and not part ofthe blue oak woodland community. Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below. > Preserve approxmately 399 acres of existing oak woodland habitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion of ground verification by a qualified arborist, the actual amount ofoak woodland present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount preserved could also be slightly greater or lesser than 399 acres). > Create 243 acres ofoak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination ofblue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees in the following SPA locations:
. Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat. . Preserve and passive open space zones tluoughout the SPA. . Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak woodlands that will be impacted by prqect grading (i.e. catch slopes).
' Other practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space. . Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodtand mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
> A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defined below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination ofacorns, seedlings, and various sizes of container trees (#1 container, #5 container, #15 container) or transplanted trees shall be incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) shall have a minimum of35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
3A.3-5 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-21
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 77 of 141 ends

Page 140 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
. One established acom equals one unit (acoms will be over planted to maximize potential germination). . One oak seedling equals one umt.
. One #l container oaktree equals two units.
. One #5 container oaktree equals three units.
. One #15 container oaktree equals fow units.
. One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
. One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh). . Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to augment overall habitat values. Each non oak tree species shall represent unit values described above for oak trees, but non oak species shall comprise no more than 10% ofthe mitigation plantings. > Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento and El Dorado Counties may be secured and placed under conservation easement in lieu of onsite mitigation measures if necessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuitY.
> Create oak woodlands off site. Plant a combination of blue oak acoms, seedlings, and trees at off-site location(s), if needed to achieve the creation goal of 243 acres of new blue oak woodland habitat. This measure would only be needed if 243 acres of blue oak woodland could not be created in the SPA. Off- site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation. Off-site tree ptanting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally support blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to prqect development. Planted areas shall be placed under conservation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity. > The oak woodtand mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant(s) shall include a maintenance and monitoring program for any replacement trees. The program shall include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria. Replacement oak trees shall be maintained and monitored for a minimum of eight years from the date of planting and inigation shall be provided to planted trees for the first five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80% survival rate for planted trees by the end of the eight- year maintenance and monitoring period. Dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department.

The security will be forfeited ifthe project applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and monitoring and meet the success cnteria Resolution No. I 0670

Page 78 of 141 ends

Page 141 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation
The project applicant(s) of all on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated frees and the off-slte Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S. 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; andthe underground sewer force main shall develop a map depicting the tree canopy of all oak trees in the survey area and identiSing the acreage oftree canopy that would be presewed and the acreage that wogld be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak trees (those not located within the delineated boundary ofoak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director. As a condition ofthe tee removal permi! project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement. The City's Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project ipplicants have developed a plan, as set forth Section 10 ofthe Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (atiached tothrs EIREIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide compensatory mitigation for removal ofprotected trees in the SPA. In addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the following elements shatl be included in a protected trei mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and agreed upon by the City:
> Project applican(s) of projects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered professional forester to perform a determinate survey of tree species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas of the project site proposed for tree removal and encroachment of development. The condition of individual trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
. 5 = Excellent; No problems - tree has no structwal problems, branches are properly spaced and tree characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.
. 4 = Good; No apparent problems - tree is in good condition and no apparent problems from visual inspection. If potential structural or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and more serious health problems can be averted. . 3 = Fair; Minor problems - There are some minor structural or health problems that pose no immediate danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist report are completed conectly the defect(s) can be minimized or eliminated.
. 2 = Poor; Major problems - the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with correct arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. If the recommended actions are completed conectly, hazard can be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. If no action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed. . 1 = Hazardous or non conectable condition - the fee is in extremely poor condition and in non- reversible decline. This ratine is assimed to a tree that has structural and/or health problems that no Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 79 of 141 ends

Page 142 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
amount oftree care work or effort can change. The issues may or may not be considered a dangerous situation. The tree may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an unacceptable risk of spreading the disease or pests(s) to other trees. . 0 = Dead - the tree has no significant signs of life (dead or very close to being dead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criterir
> The determination for whether an isolated tree shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the condition and size ofthe tree as follows:
. Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation. . Trees rated 2may be removed at 50% of the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation . Trees rated 3,4, and/or 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation. ' Native isolated oaks measunng 24 inches or greater dbh for a single trunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rated a 3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading ofthe SPA properties.
. Native oaks measuring between I 2 and 24 inches dbh and rated a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall($ higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top ofthe wall) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated 2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteria described here) would result. . Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 12 inches dbh shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteria described here) would result. . Native oak trees measuring I inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated, included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated a 3, 4, or a 5. Credits shatl only be accepted if the tree protection zone (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge ofttre tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater trees are protected on a construction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List, STPC shall not count ifthey the tree is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected tree to be preserved. The City shall accept the preservation of native oak trees in this size class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC criteria:
> Folsom Municipal Code requires one ofthe following be planted as compensation for each diameter inch of protected tree removed:

Resolution No. 10670

Page 80 of 141 ends

Page 143 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
. half of a 24-inch box tree;
. one #15 container tree;
. two #5 container trees, or
. $ 1 50 in-lieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution. > The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and inigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The plan shall include a 5-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acorns with an annual monitoring report that includes coneitions needed with proposed work plan, and notice of compliance within 90-days of annual monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The security will be forfeited ifthe prqect applicant or designated responsible party fails to fulfill the Planting and Maintenance Agreement.
> To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected trees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all affected project phases shall install high visibility fencing outside the outer edge ofthe drip lines of all trees to be retained on the SPA during project construction, The fencing may be installed around groups or stands oftrees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines of all trees ire protected. Grading, fienching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, inigatioq and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines of protected trees). If the activities listed cinnot be avoided within the drip line of a particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the tee in question shall be monitored for a period of five years and replaced only ifthe tree appears to be dead or dying within five years ofproject implementation.

Through a combination ofthe mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation ofblue oak woodland habitat in the open space aleas, the prqect applicant(s) c91 satisfu the mitigation requirements for removal offees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined through consultation with the Sacramento County Pianning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom. for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each project phase with Caltrans.

Mitigation
applicable
Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for Construction Employees.

Prior to beginning construction activities, the Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop shall describe theand conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees. The training importance
status birds;
other responsibilities related to the protection of wildlife durins construction such as insoecting open trenches of onsite biological resources, including special-status wildlife and roosting habitat for special-status bats. The biologist shall habitats; potential nests of special-
also explain the importance of
ws-I
(Addendum)
t06
-22
Resolution No. 10670

Page 81 of 141 ends

Page 144 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
dishrbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, within
suitable tadpole
habitat.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, within
suitable
northwestern
pond turtle
habitat.
under vehicles
wildlife that could become
are no snakes, small
constructron areas or undermammals, or other
equipment.

The environmental awareness progam shall be provided to all construction personnel to brief them on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biologicai resources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation requirements. If new construction personnel are added to the project, ihi contractor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before itarting work. An environmental alvareness handout that describes and illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.

Conduct Preconstruction Survey
The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstructior westem.spadefoot . suruey within +8 hours ofthe initiation ofconstruction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vemal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for western spadefoot. Ifno westem spadefoot inclividuals are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and tho City, and no further mitigation shall be required. Ifwestern spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.

Preconstruction Northwestern Turtle Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours ofthe initiation ofconstruction activity within suitable habitat for northwestem pond tr.ytle. If no northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a lettei report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If northwestern pond tr.utles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity of the project.
ws-2
(Addendum)
NWPT-1
(Addendum)
106
-23
106
-24
Resolution No. 10670

Page 82 of 141 ends

Page 145 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

On June 10, 2019, the US ArmY CorPs
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch RegencY
projecl has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.
-25 (Addendum)
3A.Sla
(Addendum)
The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construition atiivities on the project site within 14 days prior to commencement ofconstruction during the nesting season (l February ttrough 3l August)
If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW. The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent ofthe nest, to be determined by a qualified biologisi. Once the young are independent ofthe nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside ofthe nesting season.

Preconstruction
Resources
with the Plogrammatic Agreement
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

During all
construction
phases
California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Cultural
106
:16 Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identifuing historii properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those adverse effects as required under Seciion 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Histonc Preservation 1725 23rd Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.
@luationofCulturalResourcesfortheCaliforniaRegisterofHistoric Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables and management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly reference the California Register of Historical ResourceJlCRHR) lisfing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each individual development phase or off-site element, the applicable oversight agency (city of Fobom, El Dorado county, sacramento county, or caltrans), or the project applicant(s) of all project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
> The project applicant shall retain the services ofa qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of culhual resources within each individual development phase or off-site element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identifr locations that are sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of (Addendum)
3A.$lb106
J1
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 83 of 141 ends

Page 146 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
known resources, geomorphology, and topography. The inventory monitoring of ground-disfi:rbing work in these areas by a qualified report shall specify the location of
archaeologist and monitoring in the
vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate. > The identification of any sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction of each individual development phase shall be performed in concert with monitoring activities performed under the PA to mirumize the potential for conflicting requirements.
> For each resource that is determined eligible for the cRH& the applicable agency or the prqect applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the sirvices ofa qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of "significant" (under CEQA) culfitral resources.

These findings shall be reviewed by the applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and treatment measures provided in this EIREIS. > Where possible, the project shall be configured or redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resourcos. Altematively, these resources may be preserved in place ifpossible, as suggested under Califomia Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance ofhistoric properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public Resowce Code and 36 CFR Part 800 > Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement featment measures that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measwes may consist of data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because of the data they contain (which may contribute to research). Alternatively, for histoncal architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive, narrative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance tlresholds and standards provided in this EIR/EIS. > To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall prepare an appropriate prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions aginst which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate treatrnent.
> These steps and documents may be combined with the phasing ofmanagement and documents prepared pursuant to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applican(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Resolution No. 10670

Page 84 of 141 ends

Page 147 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

On June 10, 2019, the US Army CorPs
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed wlth
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department. Compliance
with this condition is monitored through
construction inspection.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of Avoidance as Required.

To reduce potentiat impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following:
> Before the start of $ound-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity ofthe project APE, to educate them about the possibility ofencountering buried cultural resources and inform them ofthe proper procedures should culfural resources be encountered. > As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion of the SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with respect to monitoring > Should any cultural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts ofbone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicimty ofthe find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and shall assess the significance ofthe find by evaluating the resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. Ifthe resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 34.5-1a and 3A.5-lb shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light ofthe approved land uses and shall implement the approved mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Monitoring If Required, Stop Work
the Find, and Perform Treatment or
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.
3A"$2
(Addendum)
106
-28
Resolution No. 10670

Page 85 of 141 ends

Page 148 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

There have been no human rematns
discovered during the course of grading
and construction in the project.

Sacramento
County
Coroner; Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
During all
ground
dishrbing
activities, for
any project
phase.
number of tlte USACE resources member shall also be
included.

The on-site sensitivity training shall be canied out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor.

Ifunanticipated discoveries ofadditional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 (l), are made during the construction ofthe project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
> The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius of the unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of Attachment G of the HPMP. The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, ifpresent, shall noti! the USACE within 24 hours ofthe discovery. > The USACE shall notify the Stiate Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatrnent measures in accordance with this HPTP.

Once tG USACE makes a formal determination of eligibility for the resource, the USACE will notift the SHPO within 48 hours ofthe determination and afford the SHPO an opportunity to comment on appropnate treatment. The SHPO shall respond within 72 hours ofthe request to consult. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hows shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the treatment measures.

The project applicants shalt be required to submit to ttre City proofofcompliance in the form ofa completed tairung roster and copy oftaining materials.

Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if lluman Remains arc Health and Safety CodeProcedurcs'
Encountered and Comply with California
In accordance with the Califomia Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground- disturbing activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applican(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area ofthe find and notift the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the natue ofthe remains. The coroner is required to examrne all discoveries ofhuman remains within 48 hours ofreceiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5tb1). If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the NAH-C by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).
3A"$3
(Addendum)
106
:29
Resolution No. 10670

Page 86 of 1 ends

Page 149 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
has
to the
Geotechnical report for the
on file with the City.

City. The
subdivision is
Geology and Soils
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
of building
permits and
ground-
the Califomia Public Resources Code.

Upon the discovery ofNative American remains, the procedxres above regarding involvement of the applicable county ioroner, notification ofthe NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be'followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensure that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted culturil or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or dishrbed by furIher developmint artivity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being ganted access to the site to inspect the site and make recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and analysis, preservation in piace, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturaliy appropriate treatment. Ai suggested by AB 2641 (Chapter 863, Statutes of 2006), the concemed pariies may extend rliscussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. A'B 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
> recordthe site withtheNAHC orthe appropriate InformationCenter, > use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or > record a reintemment document with the county.

The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native Ameiicin hwnan remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identifu an Most Likely Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site The projlct applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subjectio further distuiUance if lt rqects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant_and mediation by itre UAUC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements ouaide of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be cooriinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans). on of a discovery human remains are 5097,9 of
The project applicants shall be required to submit
training roster and copy oftraining materials.
to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed 3L.7-lt
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-30
Resolution No. 10670

Page 87 of 141 ends

Page 150 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
has been
constructlon
inspection by the City
Compliance with this condition has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
actlvlttes.

Before issuance
of building
permits and
ground-
disturbing
activities.

Before the start
of construction
activities.
review and to City or county department The final
geotechnical engineering report shall address and make recommendations on the following:
site preparation;
soil bearing capacity;
appropriate sources and types of fill;
potential need for soil amendments;
road, pavement, and parking areas;
structural foundations, including retaining'wall design; grading practices;
soil conosion olconcrete and steel;
e rosion/winterization;
seismic ground shaking;
liquefaction; and
> expansive/unstablesoils.

In ad{ition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall Monitor shall be a
geotechnical or soils englneer retained by project applicant(s) ofeach project phase. The geotechnical or all excavation, placement offill, and disposal ofmaterialssoils engineer shall provide oversight during removed from and deposited on both on- and off-site construction areas Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be
project phase with the affected oversight
or Caltrans).
3A.7-lb
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A7-3 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-31
r06
-32
Resolution No. 10670

Page 88 of 141 ends

Page 151 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and all
improvement plans in the subdivision to
verify compliance with mitigation
measure.

Development
Departrnent
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
earthmoving
activities.
permits
Hillside
for new shall be
Development state's NPDES permit, and shall
associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the prqect applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a Califomia Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submittedto the El Dorado County Public Works Departrnent and the Fl D_orado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills.

The plan sirall be consistent with El Dorado County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and ihe state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west of Prairie City Road, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before is-suance of a grading-permit. The plan shall be consistent with sacramento County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment bontrol brdinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location, implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all eiosion and sediment control measures, a description ofmeasures desigrred to control dust and stabilize the construction-site road and entrance, and a description ofthe location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering of stockpiled soils to reduce wtnd erosion.

Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction of reiaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabitization of construction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source oftransportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-l (discussed in Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land") would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.

Divert
phases
nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project
perched water
that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and during the winter months away from building foundations. 3A7-5 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-33
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 89 of 141 ends

Page 152 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
venfied compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement ofgrading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The
Community
Development
Department
ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
final maps and
building
permits for all
discretionary
development
project,
including all
on- and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
Before
of
During
earthmoving
activities in the
ione and
Mehrten
Formations.

To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particular discretionary development apptication shall implement all feasible measwes for reducing GHG emissions associated with consiructionthat are recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use ofon-site equipment, workei commute trips, and truck trips carrying materials and equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for consfuction (e.g., concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request.for bid to_contractors for the ionstruction of each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most cunent list of GHG reduction measues that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these contract
development
construction
discretionary
subsequent
particular
theas
anyfor
wellasbidfor
applicant(s)
request
The
respectrvethein
contractorpnmary
implementedbe
selectedthe
measures
with
GHG Emissions.to ControlImplement
measures arethatasubmit to the
Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically important paleontologicil resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
> Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the ione or Mehrten Formations, the project applican(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to train all construclion personnel involved with earthmoving activities, including the site superintendent, regarding the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered. > Ifpaleontological resources are discovered during earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall immediately cease work in the vicinity of the find and notifu the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines (1996). The i.rou.ry plan may include, but is not limited to, a field suwey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feisible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of coordinated by the project applican(s) ofeach applicable agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be
project phase with the affected oversight
Personnel if Paleontological Resources are
IrR/EIS)
r (FPASP
3A.7-10
(FPASP
EIn/EIS)
ChangeGreenhouse Gas
-35
106
-34
Resolution No. 10670

Page 90 of 141 ends

Page 153 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
project
construction.
considered infeasible particular development phase al time. The repor! including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by ttt City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applican(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction ofeach development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection ofa primary contractor, this meisure requires that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD's recommended measures for reducing construction-related GHG emissions at tlte time of wnting this EIiVEIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
> Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
. reduce unnecessary idling (modifu work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort); . perform equipment maintonance (inspections, detect failures early, conections); . train equipment operators in proper use of equipment; . use the proper size of equipment for the job; and
. use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains) > Use alternative fuels for electncity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use electrical power.
> Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen fNQ] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.) Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB 2009b).
> Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction worker commutes.
> Reduce electricity use in the construction office by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more efficient ones > Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and demolition debris (goal ofat least 75% by weight). > Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials (goal ofat least 20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and cwb materials), > Minimize the amount ofconcrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option. > Produce concrete on-site ifdetermined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 9 ends

Page 154 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The owner/applicant worked with an
organization Urban Wood Rescue which
is a program in association with the
Sacramento Tree Foundation that makes
wood products from large trees that are
removed as a result of development. The
owner/applicant provided most of the
large trees that were removed as a part of
the grading and construction for the
project to Urban Wood Rescue and they
made table, furniture, etc. from the trees
that were provided, The remaining trees
and tree canopy was mulched by the
owner/applicant and is stored on site to
use as mulch in the landscape areas
throughout the project. No removed trees
were transported to the landfill in
accordance with this condition of
approval.

The subdivision is not within any
identified area where contaminated
groundwater is present. Therefore there
is no required Phase I or Phase 2
Environmental Assessment required.
r06
-36
3L.4:2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
and Implement Urbrn Forestry Program and/or Before
Program to Off-Set Inss
would continue to provide
of On-Site Trees. The lrees on project site contain sequestered carbon and of final maps and/or building
permits for all
project phases
requnng
discretionary
approval,
including all
on- and off-site
elements.

Community
Development
Department
future carbon sequestration during their $owlng life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any and provide necessary funding for urban
particular discretionary development application shall
participate and community forestry program (such
the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute [Urban ForestPcosystems Institute 20091) fo ensure that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that ofall harvestable removed treeiis harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., fumitue building, Hazards and Hazardous
3A.8-2 (FPASP
EIR/f,rS)
Complete to the Extent to Which May Have Been and City of -t7 Contaminated tn Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments and during earth movlng
activities
Community
Development
Department
Implement Required Measures, The project applican(s) for any discretionary development application shail conduct Pliase I Environmental Site Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, andior other appropriate testing for all areas of the SPA > Use EPA-certified SmartWay trucks for deliveries and
about the SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is
equipment transport. Additional information
available from ARB's Heary-Duty Vehicle
Greenhouse Gas Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).
> Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist of the use of nonpotable water from a local source.

In addition to SMAQMD-recommended measures, constructron actMty shall comply wrth all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 92 of 141 ends

Page 155 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

There are no overhead powerlines
existing within this subdivision and all
proposed and fuhre utility lines to serve
this subdivision will be placed
City of Folsom
Community
Atthe
submission of
and include, as necessary potential contamlnatlon
) before constructionthat have not yet been covered by ln Exhibrt 3A, 8-1 actlvltles begin ln those areas. Recommendations the Phase and il Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities ln these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce healih hazards associated with potential exposwe to hazardous substances:
> Prepare a plan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off- site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistnbution of clean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall include measures that ensure the safe transport, use, and disposal ofcontaminated soil and building debns removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the contraotor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and teat the contaminated groundwater to remove contaminants before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The project applican(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measwes for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous materials removed from the site at an appropriate off-site disposal facility.
> Noti! the appropriate Federal, siate, and local agencies ifevidence ofpreviously undiscovered soil or groundwatei iontamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction ictivities. Any contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County Environmental Management Departrnen! central valley RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state, or local regulatory agencies. > Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD pertaining to the contents of any existing pole' mounted transformers located in the SPA, The assessment shall determine whether existing on-site electrical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is identified, the maintenance and/or disposal of the transformer shall be subject to the regulations ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority ofthe Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.
3A.E-6 (FPASP
ErR/EIS)
106
-38
Resolution No. 10670

Page 93 of 141 ends

Page 156 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
underground in accordance with the
subdivision's conditions of approval.

City and its
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Development
Department
City
Community
Development
Department
tentative map
applications.
lssuance
of grading
permits for the
proJect water
features.
from the 00-1 power or within 50 feet from the power The notification would acknowledge that theinclude discussion ofthe scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather the distance where backgound levels may increase, and provide tha! given some
to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.
uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided but is not limited to, the following components:
> Description ofthe project.
> Description ofdetention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
> Goals of the plan.
> Description of the water management elements and features that would be implemented, including:
. BMPs that would implemented on-site;
. public education and awareness;
r sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
. mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
. stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater Management Plan). > Long-term maintenance ofthe detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable conditions or maintenance by a homeowner's association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applican($ shall coordinate witit the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and vector control District to identif' and implement BMPs based on their potential effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could include, but are not limited to, the following:
3A.8-7 (FPASP
ErR/ErS)-39
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 94 of 141 ends

Page 157 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The received a
MDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). TheNDESPermit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.
^ter Quali{
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Submittal of the
State
Construction
General Permit
NOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development
and submittal of
any other
locally required
plans and
specifications
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all on-site
project phases
> build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as practicable to discourage dense plant growth; > perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant densihes to facilitate the ability ofmosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move tlroughout vegetated area; > design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water. The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling; > coordinate cleaning ofcatch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operatrons; > enforce the prompt removal of silt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water quality;
> ifthe sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception ofthe inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area of water for mosquito egg- laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipes); and
> design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy dewatering ofthe unit if necessary (Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The prqect applicant(s) of the project phase containing the off-site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e , Sacramento County) @rmits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the rssuance of grading permits, the project applicant(s) of all projects dishrbing one or more acres (including phased construction of smaller areas which are part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage__under the 3WnCS's NPOBS stormwater permit for general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ), including preparation and submittal ofa projeclspecific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) ihail also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City of FolsoT, El Dorado County (ior the off-site roldways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Altemative). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identifu and specifu:
> the use ofan effective combination ofrobust erosion and sediment conhol BMPs and construction techniques accepted by the local jwisdictions for use in the project area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoff and the release, mobilization, and exposure of pollutants, including legacy sources ofmercury from project-related construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences the implementation of approved local plans, non-stormwater management controls, permanent post- construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities; 3A.9-1(FPASP
ErR/[rs)
106
-40
Resolution No. 10670

Page 95 of 141 ends

Page 158 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
City ofFolsom
Public Works
Department
and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

Before approval
of grading plans
and building
> the pollutants that are likely to be used dunng construction and nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubncants, that could be present in stormwater drainage
and other types of materials used for
equipment operation;
> spill prevention and contingency measures, including measures to prevent or clean up spills ofhazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
> personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPI and > the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation ofthe SWPPP. > Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and construction/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as tlose listed below. > Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of sediment into nearby drarnage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of construction. These measures may include silt fences, staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation. > Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoffvelocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and transpiration. > Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoffby conveying swface runoff down sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoffto a watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over iloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and facility infrastructure.

A copy ofthe approved SWPPP shall be maintained and available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Caltrans shall coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare anU Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements Contained in Those Plans.3A.9-2 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-4t
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 96 of 141 ends

Page 159 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
requires the
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitorrng
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owneriapplicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.
and that runoff would be basins or
tluough other improvements (e.g., source biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfication impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
> an accurate calculation of pre-project and post-project runoff scenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
> runoffcalculations for the l0-year and 10O-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage pipeline sizes conftrmed based on alignments and detention facility locations finalized in the design phase; > a description ofthe proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system; > project-specific standards for installing drainage systems; > City and El Dorado County flood control design requirements and measures designed to comply with them;
Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range ofconditions needed 6 fimit hydromodification and maintain cunent stream geomorphology. ttrese SI4pi witt be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> use ofLow Impact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoffat the point of origination (thise may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept stormwater);
> enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration charactenstics; > bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bank erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and iniet floodplain restoration feahres that provide for enhancement ofriparian habitat and maintenance of nah.ral hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions; > minimize slope differences between any stormwater or detention facility outfall channel with the existing receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and > minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel and floodplain conidor, and utilize open bottom box culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage courses.

The
and
final shall demonstrate to the satisfaction ofthe City of Folsom and Et
permits of all
pmject phases.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 97 of 141 ends

Page 160 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB) The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The MDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submifted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has prepared storm
drain design reports and provided storm
drain calculations for all ofthe proposed
storm drainage features and
detention/water quality and
hydromodification basins necessary to
serve this subdivision. These reports
have been reviewed and approved by the
Community Development and Public
Works Departments.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Public Works
Department
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all project
phases and off-
site elements
and
implementation
tlroughout
project
construction.
increased from pre-development levels such that
range of conditions should be calculated for each
should be used, e.g., an Ep of 1 +10% or other as
Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works
AEP) flood channeled and TU or damage to
structures within or down SPA would not occur and that would not be existing stream geomorphology would be changed (the
receiving water if feasible, or a conservative estimate approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality
Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundanes must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County. shall include the elements described below.
> A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis of proposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage desi gn features.
> Predevelopment and post development calcutations demonstrating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the "'Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Placer Regions" ([SSQP 2007b] per NPDES Permit No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-20084142, page 46) and El Dorado County's NPDES SWMP (County of El Dorado 2004).
> Source control programs to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization, prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management ofpublic trash collection areas.
> A pond management component for the proposed basins that shall include management and maintenance requirements for the design feahres and BMPs, and responsible parties for maintenance and funding. > LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but are not limited to:
. surface swales;
I replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement); ' impervious surfaces disconnection; and
3A.9-3 (FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
I
-42
Resolution No. 10670

Page 98 of 141 ends

Page 161 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

There are no existing or proposed dams
upstream from this subdivision and
therefore there is no requirement to
perform the analysis required in this
condition of approval.

The
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
tluough construction inspection.

City of Fotsom
Community
Development
Department
Noise and
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal to the
City oftentative
maps or
improvement
plans.

Before and
during
construction
activities on the
SPA and within
El Dorado
Hills.
. fiees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be placed along the nafiral drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage patterns. The reduction in runoff as a result ofthe LID ionfigurations shall be quantified based on the runoff reduction credit system methodology described in "storirwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4" (SSQP 2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoff volumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coor{inated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans. of the City of Folsom Public Works Department.
@Practices,PrepareandImplementaNoiseControlPlrn,and
Monitor and Record Consiruction Noise near Sensitive Receptors. To reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant(s) and their primary contrictors for engiGring design and construction of all prqect phases shall ensure that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year of project construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
> Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.

Monday through Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. > All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-sensitive land uses.
3A.94 (FPASP

EIR/XIS)
3A"11-1
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
-43
r06
-44
Resolution No. 10670

Page 99 of 141 ends

Page 162 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

Blasting has been necessary tlroughout
the course of grading and construction in
this subdivision. The blasting has not
been within 2000 feet of any sensitive
receptor. The blasting contractor has
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
bulldozing and
blasting
activities on the
All construction equipment shall be properly maintained exhaust mufflers and engine strouds, in accordance with and equipped with noise-reduction intake and
manufacturers' recommendations. Equipment
engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.

All motonzed construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead ofriveting, mixing concrete offsite instead of on-site).

Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and generators) as planned phases are built out and future noise sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to future construction activities.

Written notification of construction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet of construction activities. Notification shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction activities are anticipated to occur and contact information, including a daytime telephone number, for the project representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification.

To the extent feasible, acoustic barriers (e.g., lead curtains, sound barriers) shall be constructed to reduce construction-generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses. The barriers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site construction equipment.

When installed properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by approximately 8-10 dB (EPA 1971).

When future noise sensitive uses are within close proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise' attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be located between noise sources and future residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise.

The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a construction noise management plan. This plan shall identifu specific measwes to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above.

The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the constnrction noise management plan is approved by the City of Folsom, Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofthe applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries.

Implement to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Recepton to Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
> To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted within 275 feet ofexisting or future sensitive receptors.
3A.11-3
(F.PASP
f,rR/f,IS)
106
-45
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 100 of 141 ends

Page 163 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
obtained a blasting permit from the City
and the Community Development
Department has verified compliance with
the permit ttrough construchon
inspection.

The implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construction inspection.

There are no sensitive receptors within
600 feet of any on-going construction
and grading activity in the subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
SPA and wrthin
El Dorado Hills
and the County
of Sacramento
Before
submittal of
improvement
plans for each
project phase,
and during
project
operations for
testing of
emergency
generators.

To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existrng or future sensitive receptors.
> All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of Califomia.
> A blasting plan, including estimates ofvibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement ofthe first blast.
> Each blast shall be monitored and documented for groundboume noise and vibration levels at the nearest sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Implement Measures to Project-Generated Strtionary
The prqect applican(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following meaiures to rlduce the effect of noise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:
> Routine testing and preventive maintenance ofemergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). All electrical generators shall be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers' specifications. > Extemal mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate featres designed to reduce noise emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that incorporate noise-reduction featgres, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment enclosures shall be onented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby noise- sensitive receptors.
> Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this anatysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every how during the night time [10 p.m to 7 a.m.l). Reduction of parking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensittve land uses.
> Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p m. to 7 a.m.l). Reduction of loading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as from noise sensitive land noise barriers between docks
3A.11-5
(FPASP
ErR/[rs)
106
-46
Resolution No. 10670

Page 101 of 141 ends

Page 164 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
and streetscape plans
the subdivision include the required
masonry walls in the required height and
required locations. The Community
Development Department will monitor
compliance during construction and
veriS that the sound walls are complete
prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy in the subdivision.

The Community Development
Department will monitor compliance
dunng construction and verif that the
sound walls are complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in
the subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Public Services
to
building
occupancy
to
building
occupancy
sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise- sensitive land uses,
Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise barriers, as detailed below, to reduce traffiC noise levels below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of60 dB Ldn. > 6-foot tall solid noise baniers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway. > For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion ofthe project, a 7-foot tall solid noise banier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road. > For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase I and Phase 2 portions of the project, an 8-foot tall solid noise banier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise baniers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall banier height may be achieved by utilizing a banier and earthen berm combination. Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant pnor to use Banier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of 117-122 feelftomthe ultimate atignment ofWhite Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to puiing building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White i{ock Road improvements are funded and moving forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services of a noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustiial analysis based on the actual property boundary setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measwes to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City ofFolsom noise standards.

Interior Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design featr-ues have been implemented.
> For the first-row ofhomes located along White Rock Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor building facades shall maintain minimum window assembly STC ratings of 34 > Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.
4-13-l
(Addendum)

4.13-2
(Addendum)
r06
-47
-48
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 102 of 141 ends

Page 165 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Community Development
Deparfinent has reviewed and
approved all traffrc control plans
required for the construction ofboth
off-site and on-site improvements
for this subdivision to veri$
compliance with City ordinances and
to minimize delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site elements outside
the City limits for this subdivision.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifi adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of all
relevant plans
and/or permits
and during
construction of
all project
phases.

Before issuance
of building
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all prqect
phases.
frepare and tmplement a Construction Traffic Control Plan. The project applicant(s) of all project phaies shatl prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic control plans must follow any applicable standards ofthe agency responsible for G affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising of planned lane closures, warning signage, a flag person to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by emergency vehicles. Dwing project construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the Cilifornia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval of all project plans or permrts, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applican(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and,ior Sacramento Counties and Caltrans). lncorporate Crlifornia Fire Code; City ofFolsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval. To reduce impacts related to the provision of new fire services, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following, as described below.

1. Incorporate into prqect designs fire flow requirements based on the Califomia Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (iity of FolsomMunicipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic spnnkler systems, the availability of-adequate fire. flow, and the locations of hydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided torhe City of Folsom Fire I)epartment as descnbed by Zoning Code Section 1 7.57.080 ("Vehicular Access Requirements"). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and baricades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Baniers Standard, as required by the City ofFolsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for review and approval before the issuance of building permits.

In additron to the above measwes, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall incorporate the provisions described below for the portion ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area, if it is determined ihrough City,El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 178-acre portion of the SPA.

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements based on the EDHFD fire prevention standards.

For commercial development, improvement plans showing roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler svstems. fire alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements shall be sutmitted to the ED 3A-14-1
(FPASP
ErR/[rs)
3A.14-2
(FPASP
IrR/Ers)
106
-49
106
-50
Resolution No. 10670

Page 103 of 141 ends

Page 166 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifu adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Traffic
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
of building
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed pnor
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.
submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklen shall submit sprinkler-design shee(s) and hydraulic calculafions from a Califomia State Licensed C-I6 Contractor.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy of any structures until the project applicant(s) have^obtained a Certificate ofOccupancy from the City ofFolsom Community Development Department verifying that all fire prevenlion items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 1 78-acre area of the SPA within the EDIIFD service area.

Incorporate Flow Requirements into phases
shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow Califorma Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, and/or EDHFD for those areas of the SPA within the EDHFD servrce area and shall verify to City of Folsom Fire Deparhnent that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance of occupancy permits or final inspections for all prqect phases.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair snare to luno the Construction of Improvements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intenection 1), To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lanes, one through lane, and one right-tum lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate ind reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard,/Blue Ravine Road intersection (lntersection 1).
3A.14-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

34.15-14
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
06 -51
106
_<t
Resolution No. 10670

Page 104 of 141 ends

Page 167 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected pnor to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Deparhnent
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
imorovement
The Applicant Shall Pay a l-air Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements at the Sibley StreetlBlue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Streeitslue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn laneg two through lanes, and one righfturn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Streeitslue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersiction (Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West),AMhite Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal must be installed.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Intersection 41). To ensure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left tum lane and two ihrough lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two through lanes and one dedicated right-tum lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

34.15-1b
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
3A.15-1c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-le
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
106
-53
106
-54
106
-55
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 05 of 14 I

Page 168 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic ImPact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infiastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department and
Caltrans
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

Before project
build out.

Design ofthe
White Rock
Road widening
to four lanes,
from Grant Line
Road to Prairie
City Road, with
Intersection
imnrovements
Fund and Construct Improvements to the OakAvenue Parkway/Middle (Intersection 44), To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway,{r4iddle Road intersection operates at an icceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.
in Fair Share Funding to Reduce Impacts to the
(Sacramento County Intersection 2).

Participate
Rock Road
in Fair Share to Reduce Impacts on Line Road/White
Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Intersection 3). Improvements must be made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The cunently County proposed
Cordova
White Rock Road widening proJect will widen and reaJign White Rock Road from the Rancho City limit to the EI Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line). the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock RoadThis widening includes improvements to to be the through movement. The rmprovements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane, two northbound left tum lanes, two northbound turn lanes, two westbound left tum lanes and lanes. This the of the White Rock
3A.15-1f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

34.15-1h
(TPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-ri
(FPASP
f,rR/f,IS)
r06
-56
106
-:t /
106
-58
Resolution No. 10670

Page 106 of 141 ends

Page 169 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
will pay its fair
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
has begun, and
because this
widening
project is
environmentally
cleared and
fully funded,
it's construction
is expected to
be complete
before the hrst
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
phase two of
the Hazel
Avenue
widening, from
Madison
Avenue to
Cunagh Downs
Drive, is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
complete. The
applicant shall
oav its
@ntationofthisimprovemen|theintersectionwouldoperateatan] acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvemmts, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Plrt@FafushareFundingofImprovementstoReduceImp-ac1sonHazelAvenuebetween Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Rordway Segment l0). To ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS betrveen Cunagh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part ofthe County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.
3A.ls-lj
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
r06
-59
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 107 of 141 ends

Page 170 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

El Dorado
County
Department of
Transportation
proportionate
share offunding
of
improvements
to the agency
responsible for
improvements,
based on a
progIam
established by
that agency to
reduce the
impacts to
Hazel Avenue
between
Madison
Avenue and
Cunagh Downs
Drive
(Sacramento
County
Roadway
Segment 10).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Intersection 3).
3A.1$ll
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-60
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 08 of 14 1

Page 171 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infmstructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and the City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
Caltrans
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prolect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
recommended in the Traffic operations Analysis Report for the u.s. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, in Fair Share to Reduce Impacts on Line Road/ State
Route t6 Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/State Route 1 6 lntersectlon operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-tum lane and one shared tlrough/right-turn lane. Protected left-tum signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection are
Measure A funding.
contained within the County Development Fee Program, and are scheduled for Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offirnding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improGments, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). -tatticipate
in Fair Slrare Funding oflrnprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lare must be constructed. This improvement is cunently planned as part of the Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and community Enhancements Project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvemints to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment r).
3A.15-10
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-lp
(FPASP
ErRfirs)
3A.15-lq
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-61
106
-62
106
-63
Resolution No. 10670

Page 109 of 141 ends

Page 172 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructwe
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
complete.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project has
started since the
writing of the
DrAft EIS/EIR,
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built,
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
aooroval ofthe
Erticipttein Fali Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Progam.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). partlcipate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.

The appiicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus 3A.15-1r
(FPASP
IrR/Ers)
3A.15-ls
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-64
106
-65
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 10 of 141

Page 173 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofRancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
and Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
or for by applicant, to to
US, 50 and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).
in Fair Share to Reduce Impacts on 50 between
Parttcipate m fat Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS befween Hazel Avenue and Srmrise Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be- consfucted.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S, 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency tb reduce the impacts to lVestbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1 8).
3A.15-Iu
(FPASP
f,rwErs)
3A.15-1v
(F',PASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-66
r06
-67
Resolution No. 10670
Page lll ofl41

Page 174 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision pay of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportatron fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
will pay its fair share
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This suMivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build oul A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Partfup=ttelnTtir Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound/T'olsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsibie for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4) 3A.15-1w
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
t06
-68
106
-69
106
-70
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 1 ends

Page 175 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
will pay its fair share
the following improvements wtth the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior 1o
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
farticipate in tr'air Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8), To ensure thai Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an improvement may involve a "braided ramp".

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Easibound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave (Freeway Weave 8). farticipate in fair Share Funding oflrnprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S.50 Eastbound/Oak Avenui parkway Loop Merge (Frecway Merge 9), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastboundi Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9) 3A.15-12
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.1$laa
(FPASP
ErR/[IS)
106
-71
106
_1'
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l3 of 141

Page 176 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision pay of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
subdivision will pay its
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Before project
build oul A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
frrst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
in Fair Share Funding to Reduce Impacts on
Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbounh auxiliary lane tliat ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of impiovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parlrway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29)' To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at should start the westbound auxiliaryan acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp lane that ends at the Prairie City Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus
impacts to the U.S. 50
study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway
applicant, to reduce the
Merge 29).
participate in fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ,utnp diuerg. must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor l,toUrtity Fee Program, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to thi U.S. 50 Westbountl/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge32) 3A.15-1dd
(FPASP
EIRvf,rS)
3A.15-1ee
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1ff
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-tt
106
-74
106
-75
Resolution No. 10670

Page 1 ends

Page 177 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Deparftnent and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Particifate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 33). constructed. Improvements to tlus freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. Thts auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).
3A.15-1gg
(FPASP
ErR/f,IS)
3A.r5-1hh
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
-76
106
ResolutionNo. 10670
Page I l5 of 141

Page 178 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision pay
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructwe
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
will pay its fair share
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Deparffnent
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before approval
of improvement
plans for all
project phases
any particular
discretionary
development
application that
includes
residential and
commercial or
mixed-use
development.

As a condition
of project
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

TarficipateE Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operate s at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard offramp diveige must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobiiity Fee Program, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency iesponsibie for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 WestboundiHazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38). 5e,/etoptommerclal Support Sewices and Mixed-use Development Concunent with Housing Developmenl and Develop and Provide Options for Altemative Transportation Modes. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with iesidential uses shall develop commercial and mixed-use development concunent with housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to intemalize vehicle tnps.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To fwther minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial ienters siritt develop and implement safe and secure bicycle.parking to promote altemative transLortation uses and reduce the volume ofsingle-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discrehonary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent of travel ly_traryit The project's faii-share participation and ihe associated timing ofthe improvements and service shall be identified in the project conditions ofapproval and/or the prqect's development agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT

34.15-lii
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-2a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-78
r06
-79
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 16 of 141

Page 179 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision pay
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its farr share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Concunent with
construction for
all project
phases.

Concunent with
construction for
all project
phases.

As a condition
of project
approval and/or
as a condition
ofthe
development
agreement for
all prqect
phases.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
oroiect ohase
Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program. The project applican(s) for any parhcular discretionary development application shall pay an appropnate amount into the City's existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.
roadways and intersections.

Pay Full Cost ofldentified Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program. In acCordance with Measue W, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's tralsportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because ofthe Specific Plan.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intenection (Folsom Intenection 2), To ensure that the Sibley Streettslue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicanl to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). 3A.r5-2b
(FPASP
f,rR/EIS)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP
ErR/[rs)
3A.15-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.l$4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-80
106
-81
106
-82
106
-83
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 17 of 141

Page 180 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements wrth the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
-The
Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the f,ast Bidwell SfteeVdoilege Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street interseition operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one left-through lane, and two dedicated right-turn lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study orother appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell StreetNesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

The Appticantshall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/Iion Point Road Intenection (Folsom Intersection 21), To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /lron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lanes, four through lanes and a right-tum lane, and the southbound approach must be 3A.15-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.ls-4d
(FPASP
f,rR/f,rs)
106
-84
106
-8s
106
-86
Resolution No. 10670
Pagell8ofl4l

Page 181 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
subdivision will pay its
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
burlding permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
oroiect ohase
to consist of two lanes and a right-tum City of
Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this irnprovement is infeasible.

Applicant Shall Pay
^
to the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/
Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23). To improve LOS at the Serpa Wayi Iron Point Road lntersectlorL the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist of one left-turn lane, one shared left-through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportlonate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by
reduce the impacts to the
a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for Serpa Way/lron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23)by applicanl to 3A.15-4e
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-4f
(FPASP
ETwEIS)
106
-87
106
-E8
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l9 of 141

Page 182 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
dunng which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
subdivision map to
Intersection 24).
project phase the improvement
The Applicant Shall Fund and
Parkway Intenection (Folsom
Parkway intersection operates at
Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-tum lanes, two through lanes, and two righltum lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Prrticipate in Fair Share Funding of lnprovements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoailWhite Rock Road Intersection (Sacra-mento County Intenection 3). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type of $ade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County's Proposed General Plan. Implementation ofthese improvements would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho 3A.1$4g
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.154i
(FPASP

EIWETS)
3A.1s-4j
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-89
106
-90
106
-91
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 120 ends

Page 183 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its iair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructwe
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Departrnent of
Transportation.
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before pmject
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
oroiect phase
implemented by sacramento county and the city of Rancho cordova. The applicant shall pay_ its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and iaclson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvementwould more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on thts roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding
Curragh Downs Drive and U,S.50
of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

To improve operation
this roadway segment
County's general plan
on Hazel Avenue between Cunagh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50 westbound ramps, could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento because the county's policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes.

Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.154q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segrnent will improve operations on this roadway segment and, therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12- between Cunagh Downs Drive
13)
3A.154k
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.1$41
(rPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-92
106
-93
Resolution No. 10670

Page 121 of 141 ends

Page 184 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision pay share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastrucftre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected pnor to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
Share Funding Irnprovements White Rock
Segment 28).
3A.15-4m
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
3A.15-4n
(F',PASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.1$4o
OPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-94
106
-95
r06
-96
Resolution No. 10670

Page 122 of 141 ends

Page 185 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected pnor to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructr.re
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
dunng which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
nroiect nhase
agency to
1 )
@dingofImprovementstoReduceImpactsontheHazelAvenue/U'S.50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1). To ensure that the Hazel AvenueAJ S. 50 westbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of onl dedicated left turn lane, one shared left tluough lane and three dedicated right-turn lanes.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible forim,provements, based on a piogram established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1 ).

PartlAprb in Fatr Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfanrlel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Comdor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely 1o be implemented by Caltrans by 2030 Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). 3A.15-4p
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)
3A.l54q
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-97
106
-98
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 123 of 141 ends

Page 186 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This subdivision pay of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructwe
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
will pay its fair share
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision witl pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Deparhnent of
Transportation.
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a progam established by that agency to reduce the impaits to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Shrre Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie
City Road slip on ramp should merge with the
City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the northbound Prairie eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak 3A.154r
(FPASP
f,rR/f,rs)
3A.15-4s
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-4r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-99
106
100
106
101
Resolution No. 10670

Page 124 of 141 ends

Page 187 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
and Sacramento County
Transportation fees collected prror
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
to
subdivision will pay its
the following improvements wrth the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
oroiect ohase
Avenue Parkway ramp Measurss 3A.15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to
be implemented
the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must by
may be
reduce
determined
Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).
ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Prrticipate in f,'air Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reducc Impacts on the U,S. 50 f,astbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp (see mitigation measure 3A. I 5-4u, v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should te braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus siudy or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).
3A.15-4u
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4v
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
102
142
103
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 125 of 141 ends

Page 188 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

This suMivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportalion fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
tarticpate in fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiiiary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidweli Street- Scott Road offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of impiovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).
particlpate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Wesibound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27), To ensure thal Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwetl Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of finding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 27).

Parttcipate tn Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound / Prairie city Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35), To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbourrd Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that iontinues beyond the Folsom Boulevard off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road 3A.15-4w
(FPASP
EIruEIS)
3A.15-4x
(FPASP
ErR/[IS)
3A.154y
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
r06
t04
106
t05
106
106
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 126 of 141 ends

Page 189 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This condition will be satisfied prior to
issuance ofthe 546ft building permit in
the Phase 2 portion ofthe Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch Regency project in
accordance with previous conditions of
approval. The Phase I portion ofthe
Regency project consists of 545 dwelling
umts, The VTSM for the Phase 2 portion
ofthe Regency project has not yet been
approved by the City Council.

The Capital Southeast Connector -JPA
has executed a construction contract with
Goodfellow Brothers, Inc. to construct
the Capital Southeast Connector from
Prairie Cify Road to East Bidwell Street.

The construction contract was executed
in December of2020. Grading and
construction commenced in April 2021.

The project wrll include the relocation
and signalization of the existing White
Rock Road/East Bidwell Street
inlersection. The owner/applicant will
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.
slip ramp would merge into
implemented by Caltrans,
be determined by a nexus
the impacts to the U.S. 50
lane. Improvements to
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimprovements, as may study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). segment must be
East Bidwell (Driveway #6). to Brothers Site, the
project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown Figure 4-2 of the Addendum > Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 1 SO-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; > Southbound: one tlru lane and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60'foot taper; > Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-tums from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and > Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left tums to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bldwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signatization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/White to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has progammed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street{Vhite Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 201 7 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual intersection tayout for this mitigation. Under this scenano, fair share is defined as the project's responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be.considered to beimplemented once the JPA has let contracts for consfiuction ofthe new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before prqect traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.

4.17-l
(Addendum)

4.17-2
(Addendum)
106
lD7
106
r08
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 127 of 141 ends

Page 190 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
pay the Sacramento County
Transportation Development Fee prior to
issuance of all building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community Development
Deparhnent has reviewed and approved
the improvement plans for the
construction of these required
improvements including the plans for the
modification to the existing traffic signal
at the intersection of East Bidwell Street
and Mangini Parkway. These
improvements are cwrently under
construction.

The required improvements in this
condition have been completed and
accepted by the City. These
improvements were constructed as part
ofthe off-site improvements for the
Mangini Ranch Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements,
with the
exception of the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second
northbound thru
lane pnor to
issuance of
phase 2
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
nermits.
(B) Bidwell StreelMhite Rock geometry
Figure 44 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-5 of the Addendum):
> Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right- tum lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second thru lane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);
> Southbound: One left-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- tum lane in a I 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
> Eastbound and westbound: One leflturn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60'foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.

East Bidwell Street/Savrnnah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-6 ofthe Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared through-right lane with a 150-foot taper; > Southbound approach: One left tum lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot iaper, and one through lane; > Westbound approach: One left turn lane in a 60-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane; > Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropnate taper.

Note that unsignalized Ieft tums to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A futwe sigral at

4.17-3
(Addendum)

4.17-4
(Addendum)
r06
109
106
lt0
Resolution No. 10670

Page 128 of 141 ends

Page 191 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Community Development
Department has approved the plans for
the reconstruction and signalization of
the East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek
Parkway intersection in accordance wrth
this condition.

The Capital Southeast Connector-JPA
project is cunently under construction.

The Connector project will implement
and complete Option A in this condition.

The owner/applicant shall implement the
reouired imorovements to the
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
and one thru
southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
and the second
thru southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits
this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell StreeflAlder Creek Parhray. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the prqect applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figwe 4-7 ofthe Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 1 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right tum lane in a I 50-foot pocket plus 60-foot traper. > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two tlnough lanes.

The second southbound tlrough lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way. > Westbound approach: One right tum lane, plus one left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions ofapproval from neighboring projects.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parlrway, Prior to project buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) prqect has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate anticipated U-Tums. Expand or construct a signalized intersection as follows:

4.t7-5
(Addendum)

4.17-6
(Addendum)
r06
.t1l
106
112
Resolution No. i0670

Page 129 ends

Page 192 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
intersection in compliance with this
condition prior to issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy in the Phase 3
portion ofthe project.

The Phase I Sanitary Sewer
infrastruchre including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the Alder Creek
Parkway sewer lift station and forced
main to serve this subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA landowners and
have been completed and accepted by
the City and are cunently in operation.

The City obtained a letter from Regional
San which provides verification that
there is adequate capacity in the existing
Regional San conveyance and treatment
system to accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at buildout.

Confirmation from Regional San was
required because the Folsom Plan Area
is served by the existing Regional San
Lift Station on Iron Point Road. The City
Sewer Lift Station and Forced Main
which connects to the Regional San Lift
Station has been accepted by the City
and is cwrently in operation.

Utilities and Service Systems
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right turns. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a lefl/U-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Signalize with protected phasing for left-tums and U-turns. > Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound nght tum requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 of the Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and Off-Site Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured through payment ofthe City's facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40, "Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site waste\ryater conveyance infrastruchue and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Demonstrate Adequrte SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity, The project applican(s) of all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.
3A.16-1
(FPASP
EIR/f,IS)
3A.16-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
113
106
tl4
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 130 of 141 ends

Page 193 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The owner/applicant has constructed the
necessary infrastructure to provide
potable water to the subdivision. The
potable Phase i water infrastructrue for
the Folsom Plan Area has been reviewed,
approved and accepted by the City and is
cunently in operation.

The off-site potable water infrastructure
to serve the subdivision has been
reviewed, approved and accepted by the
City and is cunently in operation. in
addition, the City has verified that the
off-site potable water infrastruclure is
adequate to serve the subdivision.

This condition is not applicable to this
subdivision. The water supply for this
subdivision is provided by the City of
Folsom Water Treatment Plant rather
than an Off-Site Water Treatment Plant
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
Additional Measures
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
buitding
permits for any
project phases.
showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar projeclspecific discretionary approval or enhtlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) of that project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure Thrt Adequate Finrncing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proofto the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is enswed or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe iinal subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected). If an off-site water treatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on- site WTP altemative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval ofthe final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.
3A.18-t
(FPASP
ETRyEIS)
3A.18-2a
(FPASP
EIR/f,IS)
3A.1&2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
115
106
ll6
r06
117
Resolution No. 10670

Page 131 of 141 ends

Page 194 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the fuhre Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction of the
City
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval offirst
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U,S.

Highway 50.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Recepton to Operational Emissions ofToxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Tralfic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, wrth the input ofthe City of Folsom, the City ofRancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development a$eement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts ofannual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjunsdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption ofa TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implemeniation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City'sjurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itselfa "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 1 5096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion ofthis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means ofmitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunenfly feasible or practical. However, as the prefened, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those podons of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than 296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009.

March. Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version2.2.7\, or such different tlreshold of simificance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure AIR-
l-Land
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)
106
ll8
ResolutionNo. 10670

Page 132 of 141 ends

Page 195 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
time, f any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than significant.

As an altemative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck taffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures :
> Thequarryprojectapplicant(s)shouldmeetwiththeCityofFolsomtodiscussmitigationstrategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health fusk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be localed along the sides ofroadway segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. Each project- level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project-level analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel trucks), and emission rates representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk determined by in the HRA exceeds 296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by S}vL{QMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. ifthis mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the results of the HM, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applican(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA untrl said mitigation fees are paid.
. implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south ofa roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the dispersion and frltration of mobile-source TACs associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the trees reach maturity, which breaks the line of sight between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes. These tees should be planted before occupation ofany affected sensitive land uses. This measure encouraees the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe Resolution No. 10670

Page 133 of 141 ends

Page 196 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval of first
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.
50 construction ofpotentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of these trees should be maintained through the duration of the quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s).
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
r equip all affected residences and school buildings developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle Anesting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air intake points to the interior rooms, . use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from roadway air pollution sources as possible; and . develop and implement an ongoing educatron and maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part ofthe Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City ofFolsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input ofthe City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 201 0, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development a$eement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility oftruck traffic from the quanies with the future urban development in the SPA and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, Desilva Gates, or Walltown quany project applicants as ihese projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities of the quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's junsdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons- the Citv of Folsom considers itself a "responsible asencv" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-l-Land
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
ll9
Resolution No. 10670

Page 134 of 141 ends

Page 197 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

Guidelines, CCR Section 1 538 l), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as ofthe completion oftltis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could anse from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation ofthe precise means of mrtigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the prefened, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic tkough the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the haffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more resfictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntanly implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive ieceptors to noise generated by quarry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of 3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above.

The City encourages implementation ofthe following measures:
> The quany project applicant(s) should meet with the City ofFolsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City ofFolsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides ofroadway segments that are identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted using an approved three dimensional traffic noise modeling program (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each project- level analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City of Folsom for the purpose of discloswe to the public and decision makers. The project-level analysis should account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the percentage ofhealy trucks). Ifthe incremental increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the ttreshold of significance recommended by the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:

ResotutionNo. 10670

Page 135 of 141 ends

Page 198 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The FPA landowners have satisfied all of
the mitigatron measures for the design
and construction ofthe Phase 1 Water
and Sewer Backbone Infrastructure to
serve the first of development in the
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
Model the benefits ofsoundwalls (benn/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected receptors not to exceed a total height ofeight feet (two-foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). Ifthis mitigation measure is determined by the City olFolsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of rubberized asphalt at the expense ofthe quarry truck applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s). > Implement the installation ofrubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive receptors that carry quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of traffic noise levels. The inclusion ofrubberized asphalt would provide an additional 3 to 5 dB of traffic noise reduction. The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by the quarry truck applican(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South ofU.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City ofFolsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
> To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
. Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed construction plans of residences adjacent to affected roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the intenor noise level standard of45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks. . Determine the interior quarry truck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck applicant(s) should pay for the cost of window package upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated windows) required to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applican(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off-Site Water Facility Alternative. The prqect applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastucture and off-site water facility altemative improvements. The project appticant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Fo lsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014):

N/AI06
120
Resolution No. 10670

Page 136 of 141 ends

Page 199 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

FPA. The Phase 1 backbone
Infrastrucfure was completed and
accepted by the City in 2018 and is
cunently in use in the FPA and being
owned and operated by the City. The off-
site water facility altemative
improvements were not implemented.

The water for the FPA was provided
through the conservation of existing
water in the City. The new water supply
alternative was validated in 2014.

Public Works
Department
project phase,
the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to
the City's
satisfaction the
fair share
contnbution
towards
implementation
of Backbone
Infrastructure
and Off-Site
Water Facility
improvements
and associated
required
mitigation as
identified in the
Folsom South of
U.S. Highway
50 Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated
Negative
Declaralion
(December
2014) or the
Revised
ProposedOf-
Site Wder
Facility
Alternalive
Addendwn to
the FPASP
EINEIS
(approved
December
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-1: Design above ground pump station and storage tank facilitie s to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-1: Prepare and Implement NOX Reduction Plan > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2:Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l: Conduct Special-Status Plant Suweys; Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measwe IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vemal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhom Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western Spadefoot Toad > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond Turtle > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's Hawk Nesting Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foraging Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored Blackbird > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting Raptors > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-I0: Special-Status Bats > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l2: Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-13: Conduct Surveys to Identifu and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Pemit and Section 401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Waters of the State Resolution No. 10670

Page 137 of 141 ends

Page 200 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
2012); as
applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l5: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Impl€ment an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l l: American Badger > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property treatment plans > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure M-l: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan for the detention basin West of Praine City Road. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure MI-l: Greenhouse Gas Emissions > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XW-l : Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3: North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V1-4 Norftr of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XI-l North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Revised Proposed Off-Site Waer Facility Alternative Addendwn to the FPASP EIMEIS (approved December I 1, 2012):
> 38.1-2a:Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural Facilities.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 138 of 141 ends

Page 201 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
> 38.1-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 38.1-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 38.1-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
> 3P..2-1a'. Develop and Implement a Construction NOX Reduction Plan, > 3P,2-1c: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during Construction.
> 3P.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors. > 3B.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to Acceptable Concentrations.
> 38.4-1a: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during Construction. > 3B.4-1b Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water Facilities Climate Action Plan. > 34.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 34 5-1b: Perform an inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.
> 3A5-2: Conduct Conskuction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Culnral Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> 3A.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 3B.7-la Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement Required Measures.
> 3B.7-lb: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Confingency Measures Into Final Pipeline Design. > 3P..7-4: Implement Conosion Protection Measures.
> 38.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work ifPaleontological Resouces are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
> 38.8-la: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 38.8-lb: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials Management Plan. > 38.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 139 of 141 ends

Page 202 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Capital Southeast Connector - JPA
project commenced construction in April
2021. Since the project is now complete
this condition has been satisfied.

CD (E)M
> 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 3B.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible Materials. > 38.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. > 3B.9-1a: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. > 38 9-1b: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. > 3B.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for Structural Facilities. > 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment. > 38.11-1a: Limit Construction Hours.
> 38.I l-lb: Minimize Noise from Construction F4uipment and Staging. > 38.1 1-1c: Maximize the Use of Noise Baniers.
> 38. 1 1-1d: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources Dunng Construction. > 38.I l-le: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechamsm for Filing Noise Complaints. > 38.11-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization Measures. > 3B. l2-i: Provide for Continued Recreational Access as Identified in Mitigation Measure 3.14- l a > 38. l5-1a: Prepare Traffic Contiol Plan.
> 38. 15-1b: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions. > 38.16-3a: Minimize Utitity Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert. > 38.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and Implement Appropnate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
> 38.17-1a: Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practioes. > 38 l7-1b: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program. > 3A.l8-l: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. > 3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

White Rock Road Shoukler Imptovements
The owner/applicant shall construct shoulder improvements along the project's entire frontage of westbound White Rock Road to the satisfaction of the City prior to approval of the first small lot final map. In lieu of constructing the aforementioned interim shoulder improvements, the owner/applicant may enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and post

20. Resolution No. 10670

Page 140 of 141 ends

Page 203 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the Phase 38 subdivision improvements
plans and all ofthe existing oak trees
that are required to be preserved are
currently in place and have been
protected during grading and
construction which commenced in the
fall of 2021. The Community
Development Department has allowed
various revisions to the City
development standards to further
enhance the preservation ofthe existing
oak trees.
cD (E) (P)
cD (E) (P)
M
M
adequate security to the City's satisfaction to ensure construction of said improvements; the security shall be for a minimum period of 10 years.

Ifshoulder improvements are constructed and/or funded by the owner/applicant, then said costs may be included in any applicable fee program established and approved for the Folsom Plan Area subject to approval by the City and the actual costs expended by the owner/applicant may therefore be eligible for a credit and/or reimbursement.

Ifconstruction ofthe Capital Southeast Corurector Project between Scott Road and the El Dorado Cormty line has commenced during the term of the required Subdivision Improvement Agreement, then the shoulder improvement condition will be deemed satisfied and the security shall be released to the owner/applicant.

The owner/applicant shall preserve the oak tees shown in the blue color on the atlached Site Plan Exhibit for the Traditional Subdivision. The owner/applicant shall also make every attempt to preserve the tree shown in red on the attached Site Plan Exhibit provided that the City Arborist concurs (since this oak hee will be approximately 3' lower than adjacent pad grades). The additional land created from elimination of lots 49, 56, and 57 as shown on the Site Plan Exhibit shall be incorporated into the adjacent residential lots to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Department. Consistent with FPASP Policy 10.19, the Community Development Director will allow modifications to the development standards to order to accommodate preservation of the oak tree onLot 62 as shown on the attached Site Plan Exhibit. This condition shall be satisfied prior to approval of the Final Map for the Traditional Subdivision. 2l
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 141 of 141 ends

Page 204 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.7.
ffi
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: t01812024
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 1272 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ray Gaskin Service to Purchase and Install New Side Loader Collection Equipment FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMME,NDATION / COIINCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 1 1272 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ray Gaskin Service to Purchase and Install New Side Loader Collection Equipment.

BACKGRO / ISSUE
The Public Works Department must maintain a fleet of collection vehiclds that is able to provide efficient and reliabie solid waste collection service. The City's requirement for these collection vehicles is based on the need to maintain its aging fleet and to provide the current level of services.

The department is requesting authorization to purchase a new collection body installed on an existing truck that has otherwise been determined to be mechanically sound. The purchase will update the body and extend the useful life of a truck that would otherwise need to be replaced at a cost ofover $500,000.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Ray Gaskin Service (Ray Gaskin) for the removal of an obsolete and worn-out waste collection body, and purchase and installation of one New Way automated side loader collection body, to be installed on existing City solid waste collection vehicle number lI2L The total cost for the purchase and installation of this body will not exceed $243 ,633 . Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Solid Waste Operating Fund (Fund 540). 1

Page 205 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.8.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $73,209 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

Section 2.36.170 of the Folsom Municipal Code permits cooperativd purchasing agreements for the procurement of any supplies, equipment, service, ot construction with one or more public procurement units in accordance with an agreement entered into or between the participants.

ANALYSIS
Sourcewell is a national cooperative purchasing entity of which the City of Folsom is a member. The City has purchased numerous items through Sourcewell. New Way Truck has a current contract with Sourcewell for solid waste collection bodies at a price that has been assessed to be fair, reasonable, and competitive. Ray Gaskin is the local representative and distributor for New Way Truck. Sourcewell contract number #110223-NWY will be utilized for the purchase of a New Way Automated Side Loader Body and installation on an existing City owned chassis.

FINANCIA I,IMPACT
The purchase and installation of new Side Loader collection equipment on a currently owned vehicle that would otherwise need to be replaced was anticipated and included in the approved Fiscal Year 2024-25 Solid Waste Operating Budget. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Solid Waste Fund (Fund 540) for the purchase and installation. The Department is requesting that the contract be authorized for a not to exceed amount of $243,633. This price includes taxes and delivery.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11272 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ray Gaskin Service to Purchase and Install New Side Loader Collection Equipment Submitted,
2 Mark Rackovan, Public Works Director

Page 206 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.8.

RESOLUTION NO. II272

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH RAY GASKIN SERVICE TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL NEW

SIDE LOADER COLLECTION EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has validated its need to update an automated side loader solid waste collection vehicle; and
WHEREAS, this purchase will be made through Sourcewell, which used its recognized cooperative purchasing agreement to award a contract to New Way Trucks, represented locally by Ray Gaskin Service, in an amount not to exceed $243,633; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Solid Waste Fund (Fund 540) Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the execution of a contract with Ray Gaskin Service for the purchase and installation of one new automated side loader collection body on an existing City owned vehicle; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Ray Gaskin Service to Purchase and Install New Side Loader Collection Equipment for the Public Works Department at a not to exceed amount of $243,633.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of October 2024,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No.ll272
Page I of I Page 207
10/08/2024 Item No.8.

This page is intentionqllA left blank
to fo"cilitote double- sided printtng
and minimize poper trse.

CITY OF
DIgTINC?IVE BY NATURE
FOLSOl\[

Page 208 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.8.
: i r!.i. .::-' i :::\'l
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: r01812024
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 1273 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Folsom Lake Ford for the Purchase of Five Police Vehicles
FROM: Police Department

RECO ATION / CITY COUN ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11273 ' A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Folsom Lake Ford for the Purchase of Five Police Vehicles.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Service Delivery Plan adopted by the City Council calls for replacing marked police cars at 75,000 miles. The Police Department is currently utilizing 12 vehicles with mileage exceeding 75,000 miles, 10 of which are marked patrol vehicles. Five Ford police vehicles were ordered from the Folsom Lake Ford in September2}22;however, the production of these vehicles was postponed indefinitely. Folsom Lake Ford contacted the Police Department in February of 2024 to explain the delay and offer these vehicles as 2025 models at the fixed price set in September 2022,,with the understanding that manufacturing would begin in the Fall of 2024.

Nationwide, the supply of vehicles is limited, disproportionately affecting SUVs, including vehicles for police service. The Police Department is fortunate that the Ford Motor Company has agreed to the price quoted in Septemb er 2022. This quote is part of a State of California contract which ensures the best available price for these vehicles. 1 POLICY / RULE

Page 209 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

Section 2.36.080 of the Folsom Municipal Code requires that the City Council award contracts above $73,209.00.

Section 2.36.I70 of the Folsom Municipal Code permits cooperative purchasing agreements for procuring supplies, equipment, service, or construction with one or more public procurement units following an agreement between the participants. Such cooperative purchasing may include but is not limited to, joint or multiparty contracts between public procurement units and open-ended state public procurement unit conttacts, which are made available to the City.

ANALYSIS
Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs) have become an industry standard for law enforcement since their introduction in2013. Ford Explorers are proven to be incredibly durable and reliable for the heavy use demands typical of a police patrol vehicle.

This purchase of five Ford Explorer police vehicles will reduce the number of marked patrol vehicles exceeding 75,000 miles to five.

FINANCIA I,IMPACT
The purchase of police vehicles was anticipated and included in the approved Fiscal Year2024- 25 Police Budget. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the General Fund (Fund 010) for the purchape. The purchase agreement for the five Ford police vehicles would be authorized for an amount not to exceed $330,210. Once these new vehicles go into service, five high- mileage police vehicles will be disposed of following City Policy.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11273 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Folsom Lake Ford for the Purchase of five Police Vehicles

2. Quote from Folsom Lake Ford
Submitted,
Richard Hillman, Chief of Police
2Page 210
10/08/2024 Item No.9.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 211 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

RESOLUTION NO. II273

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH FOLSOM LAKE FORD FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIVE

FORD POLICE VEHICLES
WHEREAS, the City has elected to purchase five Ford police vehicles for the Folsom Police Department; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available for the purchase of the police vehicles in the Police Department's Fiscal Year 2024-25 General Fund (Fund 010) budget; and
WHEREAS, this purchase is through Folsom Lake Ford, the only vendor able to currently supply these vehicles.

WHEREAS, the agreement wili be in a format acceptable to the City Attorney.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a purchase agreement with Folsom Lake Ford for the purchase of five Ford police vehicles for an amount not to exceed $330,210.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of October 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmembers(s)
Councilmembers(s)
Councilmembers(s)
Councilmembers (s)
Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1273

Page 1 of 1 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 213 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

PRICE QUOTATION

FOLSOM LAKE FORD
12755 FOLSOM BLVD.

FOLSOM, CA 95630
(916) 351-4202 - Direct Date: 912312024
To: Lieutenant Jake VerHalen I Operations Division / Folsom Police Department From: Mark A. Paoli / Fleet Director / Folsom Lake Ford Subject: Pricing for 2024 Ford Interceptor (State of California Contract#l-22-23-l4C) $49,340.00 - Bid Price (2024 Ford Police Inrerceptor utility AwD I 3.3L V6 Hybrid) -2,853.00 - Baltistic Door Panel Delete (Level III+) Credit Per State Contract (90E) 5,047.00 - Ballistic Door-Panels (Level IV+1 Driver & Passenger Front Doors (90G) 3,757.00 - Ready-for-the-Road Package (67H)
1,100.00 - Paint Four Doors White (CAL) Lifetime Warranty 705.00 - Police Perimeter Alert (688)
637.00 - Rear Auxiliary Air Conditioning (17A)
620.00 - Spot Lamps - Dual Unity LED (51S)
601.00 - Rear Quarter Glass Side Marker LED Lights (63L) 576.00 - Front Warning Auxiliary LED Lights (21L)
408.00 - Rear Auxiliary Liftgate LED Lights (43A)
354.00 - Remote-Keyless Entry (55F) - Includes 4 Keys and 4 FOBs 350.00 - Underbody Deflector Plate (76D)
304.00 - Side Marker LED Lights - Sideview Mirrors (638) 273.00 - Police Engine Idle Feature (47A)
240.AA - Rear Camera On-Demand (l9V)
194.00 - Police Wire Harness Connector Kit - Front/Rear (67V) l5l .00 - Pre-Collision Assist (76P)
1 14.00 - H8 AGM Battery ( l9K)

78.00 - Rear-Door Controls lnoperable - Locks/Handles/Windows (68G)

64.00 - Tail Lamp Police Interceptor Housing Only (86T)

54.00 - Switchable Red/White Lighting In Cargo Area (l7T)

54.00 - Keyed Alike - Code I l5iX (59G)
$61,168.00 - Selling Price (Agate Black Metallic Paint dFour White Doors)

85.00 - Documentation Fee
$61,253.00 - Subtotal
4,747.1 1 - Sales Tax (7.75%)

33.00 - DMV Electronic Filing Fee

8.75 - California Tire Fee
$66,041.86 - Total Price (EACH)
X5
$330,209.30 - Total Price (5-Interceptors) F.O.B. Folsom, CA

Page 214 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

Payment Terms: $500.00 Discount Per Vehicle for Payment Within 20 Days / Net 30 Included: park Car Feature, Ford Telematics (Includes Complimentary Two-Year Subsuiption), Front License Plate Bracket, Gtobal Lock/Unlock Feature, Noise Suppression, Police lnterceptor Badge Delete, Rear View Camera (Displayed In Rear View Mirror), Reverse Sensing, SYNC (Bluetooth), Trailer Hitch (Class III - Includes Wiring), Upfitter Switches(4) Mounted on Steering Wheel and 5yrl100k/0ded Powertrain Warranty.

Page 215 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

This page is intenti,onqllA Ieft blCInk
to facilitote do,uble- sided printing
and minimize paper ttse.

CITY OF

DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
FOLSON{

Page 216 ends

10/08/2024 Item No.9.

Folsom City CouncilOctober 8, 2024

Folsom City Council
October 8, 2024