Folsom City Council
January 27, 2026

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

as necessary based upon the sensitivity of the project APE, to educate them about the possibility of encountering
buried cultural resources and inform them of the proper procedures should cultural resources be encountered.
 As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion of the SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown
cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with
respect to monitoring.
 Should any cultural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity of the find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight
agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and shall assess the significance of the find by evaluating the
resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. If the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or
destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved
mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department. Compliance
with this condition is
monitored through
construction inspection.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitivity training program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for
construction supervisors. The sensitivity training program shall provide information about notification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for
coordination between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and information about other treatment or issues that may arise if cultural resources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocol shall be communicated to all new construction personnel during
orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible location inside the construction job trailer. The phone number of the USACE cultural resources staff member shall also be included.

The on-site sensitivity training shall be carried out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor.

If unanticipated discoveries of additional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 (l), are made during the construction of the project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
 The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius of the unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional
qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of
Attachment G of the HPMP. The Construction Manager, or
archaeological monitor, if present, shall notify the USACE within 24 hours of the discovery.
 The USACE shall notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an
unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance with this HPTP. Once the USACE

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

makes a formal determination of eligibility for the
resource, the USACE will notify the SHPO within 48
hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an
opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The
SHPO shall respond within 72 hours of the request to
consult. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the
treatment measures.

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials.
71-29 3A.5-3
(Addendum)
Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.

In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing
activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area of the find and notify the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional
archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature of the remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5[b]). If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the NAHC by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner’s findings are complete, the project
applicant(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC-designated Most Likely Descendant shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for acting on notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code.

During all ground
disturbing activities,
for any project phase.

Sacramento
County
Coroner;
Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
There have been no
human remains
discovered during the
course of grading and
construction in the
project.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Upon the discovery of Native American remains, the
procedures above regarding involvement of the applicable county coroner, notification of the NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensure that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make
recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and
analysis, preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatment. As suggested by AB 2641 (Chapter 863, Statutes of 2006), the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. AB 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
 record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate
Information Center,
 use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or
 record a reinternment document with the county.

The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native American human
remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identify an Most Likely Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials.

Geology and Soils
71-30 3A.7-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC
Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations.

Before building permits are issued and construction activities begin any project development phase, the project applicant(s) of each project phase shall hire a licensed geotechnical engineer to prepare a final geotechnical subsurface
investigation report for the on- and off-site facilities, which shall be submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified below). The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make
recommendations on the following:
 site preparation;
 soil bearing capacity;
 appropriate sources and types of fill;
 potential need for soil amendments;
 road, pavement, and parking areas;
 structural foundations, including retaining-wall design;  grading practices;
 soil corrosion of concrete and steel;
 erosion/winterization;
 seismic ground shaking;
 liquefaction; and
Before issuance of
building permits and
ground-disturbing
activities.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant has
provided Geotechnical
Report to the City. The
Geotechnical report for
the subdivision is on file
with the City.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 expansive/unstable soils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions, and shall determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the version of the CBC that is applicable at the time building and grading permits are applied for. All recommendations
contained in the final geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented by the project applicant(s) of each project phase.

Special recommendations contained in the geotechnical
engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before construction begins. Design and construction of all new project development shall be in accordance with the CBC. The project applicant(s) shall provide for engineering inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with
recommendations contained in the geotechnical report.
71-31 3A.7-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All
earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant(s) of each project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement of fill, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on both on- and off- site construction areas.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Before issuance of
building permits and
ground-disturbing
activities.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Compliance with this
condition has been
monitored through
construction inspection
by the City.

Yes
71-32 3A.7-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and
Erosion Control Plan. Before grading permits are issued, the project applicant(s) of each project phase that would be located within the City of Folsom shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan.

The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department before issuance of grading permits for all new development. The plan shall be consistent Before the start of
construction activities.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Compliance with this
condition has been
monitored through
construction inspection
by the City.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

with the City’s Grading Ordinance, the City’s Hillside
Development Guidelines, and the state’s NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan.

The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills. The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County’s Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state’s NPDES
permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west of Prairie City Road, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall be
consistent with Sacramento County’s Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state’s NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location,
implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description of measures designed to control dust and stabilize the
construction-site road and entrance, and a description of the location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering of stockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion. Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction of retaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabilization of construction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source of transportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-1 (discussed in Section 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality – Land”) would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.
71-33 3A.7-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building
Foundations. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist of perforated pipe and gravel, surrounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months away from building foundations.

Before and during
earthmoving activities.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and all
improvement plans in
the subdivision to verify
compliance with
mitigation measure.

Yes
71-34 3A.7-10
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if
Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the
Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a
Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically important paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
 Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the Ione or Mehrten Formations, the
project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to train all construction personnel
involved with earthmoving activities, including the site superintendent, regarding the possibility of encountering During earthmoving
activities in the Ione
and Mehrten
Formations.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2020.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered.
 If paleontological resources are discovered during
earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall
immediately cease work in the vicinity of the find and
notify the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage
coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change
71-35 3A.4-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Additional Measures to Control Construction-
Generated GHG Emissions.

To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particular discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures for reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are
recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use of on-site equipment, worker commute trips, and truck trips carrying materials and
equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for construction (e.g., Before approval of
small-lot final maps
and building permits
for all discretionary
development project,
including all on- and
off-site elements and
implementation
throughout project
construction.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary
development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most current list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract with the selected primary contractor. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application may submit to the City and SMAQMD a report that substantiates why specific
measures are considered infeasible for construction of that particular development phase and/or at that point in time. The report, including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by the City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction of each development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection of a primary contractor, this measure requires that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD’s recommended measures for reducing
construction-related GHG emissions at the time of writing this EIR/EIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
 Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
 reduce unnecessary idling (modify work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort);
 perform equipment maintenance (inspections, detect
failures early, corrections);
 train equipment operators in proper use of equipment;  use the proper size of equipment for the job; and
 use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains).

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Use alternative fuels for electricity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use
electrical power.
 Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen [NOX] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.)
Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB
2009b).
 Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction
worker commutes.
 Reduce electricity use in the construction office by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more
efficient ones.
 Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and
demolition debris (goal of at least 75% by weight).
 Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials (goal of at least 20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and curb materials).
 Minimize the amount of concrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option.
 Produce concrete on-site if determined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.
 Use EPA-certified SmartWay trucks for deliveries and
equipment transport. Additional information about the
SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is available
from ARB’s Heavy-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas
Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to
efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist of the use of nonpotable water from a local source.

In addition to SMAQMD-recommended measures, construction activity shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.
71-36 3A.4-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community
Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The trees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary funding for urban and community forestry program (such as
the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest
Ecosystems Institute [Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensure that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that of all harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., furniture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and fund an off-site tree program that includes a level of tree planting that, at a minimum, increases carbon
sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime.

This program shall be funded by the project applicant(s) of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an
independent Certified Arborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements of Mitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3,
“Biological Resources - Land.” Final approval of the program shall be provided by the City. Components of the program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the City of Folsom would simultaneously mitigate the loss of oak
Before approval of
final maps and/or
building permits for all
project phases
requiring discretionary
approval, including all
on- and off-site
elements.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant
worked with an
organization Urban
Wood Rescue which is a
program in association
with the Sacramento
Tree Foundation that
makes wood products
from large trees that are
removed as a result of
development. The
owner/applicant
provided most of the
large trees that were
removed as a part of the
grading and construction
for the project to Urban
Wood Rescue and they
made table, furniture,
etc. from the trees that
were provided. The
remaining trees and tree
canopy was mulched by
the owner/applicant and
is stored on site to use as
mulch in the landscape
areas throughout the
project. No removed
trees were transported to
the landfill in accordance
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The California Urban Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008). All unused vegetation and tree material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative material should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant.
with this condition of
approval.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
71-37 3A.8-2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which
Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in
Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental
Site Assessments and Implement Required Measures.

The
project applicant(s) for any discretionary development
application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing for all areas of the SPA and include, as necessary, analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potential contamination sites that have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 3A.8-1) before construction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following
measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substances:
 Prepare a plan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off-site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution of clean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall
include measures that ensure the safe transport, use, and Before and during
earth moving activities
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The subdivision is not
within any identified
area where contaminated
groundwater is present.

Therefore there is no
required Phase 1 or
Phase 2 Environmental
Assessment required.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

disposal of contaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the
contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and treat the contaminated groundwater to remove contaminants
before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The
project applicant(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal of
hazardous materials removed from the site at an
appropriate off-site disposal facility.
 Notify the appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies if evidence of previously undiscovered soil or groundwater contamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction activities. Any
contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County
Environmental Management Department, Central Valley
RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state,
or local regulatory agencies.
 Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD
pertaining to the contents of any existing pole-mounted transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall
determine whether existing on-site electrical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is
identified, the maintenance and/or disposal of the
transformer shall be subject to the regulations of the Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority of the
Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-38 3A.8-6
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure.

Potential purchasers of residential properties near the transmission lines shall be made aware of the controversy surrounding EMF exposure. The California Department of Real Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant’s final Subdivision Public Report application, which shall be provided to purchasers of properties within 100 feet from the 100-115kV power line , or within 150 feet from the 220-230 kV power line . The notification would include a discussion of the scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where background levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

At the submission of
tentative map
applications.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
There are no overhead
powerlines existing
within this subdivision
and all proposed and
future utility lines to
serve this subdivision
will be placed
underground in
accordance with the
subdivision’s conditions
of approval.

Yes
71-39 3A.8-7
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Implement a Vector Control Plan in
Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and
Vector Control District. To ensure that operation and design of the stormwater system, including multiple planned detention basins, is consistent with the recommendations of the
Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District
regarding mosquito control, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Vector Control Plan. This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the City for approval before issuance of the grading permit for the detention basins under the City’s jurisdiction. For the off-site detention basin, the plan shall be submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance of the grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008). The plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following components:
 Description of the project.

Before issuance of
grading permits for the
project water features.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Description of detention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
 Goals of the plan.
 Description of the water management elements and
features that would be implemented, including:
 BMPs that would implemented on-site;
 public education and awareness;
 sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
 mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
 stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater
Management Plan).
 Long-term maintenance of the detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable
conditions or maintenance by a homeowner’s association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identify and implement BMPs based on their potential
effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could
include, but are not limited to, the following:
 build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as
practicable to discourage dense plant growth;
 perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant
densities to facilitate the ability of mosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move throughout vegetated area;
 design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water.

The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction
during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling;

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 coordinate cleaning of catch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operations;
 enforce the prompt removal of silt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water
quality;
 if the sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception of the inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area of water for mosquito egg–laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipes); and
 design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy
dewatering of the unit if necessary (Sacramento Yolo
Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant(s) of the project phase containing the off- site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County).

Hydrology and Water Quality
71-40 3A.9-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and
Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the issuance of
grading permits, the project applicant(s) of all projects disturbing one or more acres (including phased construction of smaller areas which are part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage under the SWRCB’s NPDES stormwater permit for
general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ),
including preparation and submittal of a project-specific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) shall also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City of Folsom, El Dorado County (for the off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Alternative). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identify and specify:
 the use of an effective combination of robust erosion and sediment control BMPs and construction techniques
accepted by the local jurisdictions for use in the project Submittal of the State
Construction General
Permit NOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development and
submittal of any other
locally required plans
and specifications
before the issuance of
grading permits for all
on-site project phases
and off-site elements
and implementation
throughout project
construction.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP’s, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoff and the release, mobilization, and exposure of pollutants, including legacy sources of
mercury from project-related construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion
control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation
ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences
 the implementation of approved local plans, non-
stormwater management controls, permanent post-
construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance
responsibilities;
 the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and
nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other types of materials used for equipment operation;
 spill prevention and contingency measures, including
measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
 personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit
requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs
specified in the SWPPP; and
 the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP.
 Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and
construction/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as those listed below.  Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control
measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of
sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
SRWQCB.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

construction. These measures may include silt fences,
staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation.  Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoff
velocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and transpiration.
 Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoff by conveying surface runoff down
sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoff to a
watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and
facility infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be maintained and
available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Caltrans shall coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project
SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).
71-41 3A.9-2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement
Requirements Contained in Those Plans.

Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off- site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, demonstrating that off-site upstream runoff would be appropriately conveyed through the SPA, and that project-related on-site runoff would Before approval of
grading plans and
building permits of all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfication impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
 an accurate calculation of pre-project and post-project runoff scenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
 runoff calculations for the 10-year and 100-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as
required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage
pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and
detention facility locations finalized in the design phase;  a description of the proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system;
 project-specific standards for installing drainage systems;  City and El Dorado County flood control design
requirements and measures designed to comply with them; Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range of conditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain current stream geomorphology. These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
 use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoff at the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious
surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept
stormwater);
BMP’s, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
SRWQCB.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics;
 bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bank
erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for
enhancement of riparian habitat and maintenance of natural hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions;
 minimize slope differences between any stormwater or
detention facility outfall channel with the existing
receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and  minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel
and floodplain corridor, and utilize open bottom box
culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage
courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado County Department of
Transportation that 100-year (0.01 AEP) flood flows would be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures within or down gradient of the SPA would not occur, and that hydromodification would not be increased from pre-development levels such that existing stream geomorphology would be changed (the range of
conditions should be calculated for each receiving water if feasible, or a conservative estimate should be used, e.g., an Ep of 1 ±10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works
Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County.
71-42 3A.9-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Develop and Implement a BMP and Water Quality
Maintenance Plan. Before approval of the grading permits for any development project requiring a subdivision map, a
Prepare plans before
the issuance of grading
permits for all project
City of
Folsom
Community
The Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

detailed BMP and water quality maintenance plan shall be prepared by a qualified engineer retained by the project applicant(s) the development project. Drafts of the plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom and El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, for review and approval concurrently with development of tentative subdivision maps for all project phases. The plan shall finalize the water quality improvements and further detail the structural and nonstructural BMPs proposed for the project. The plan shall include the elements described below.
 A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis of proposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage design features.
 Predevelopment and post development calculations
demonstrating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the ’“Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and
South Placer Regions” ([SSQP 2007b] per NPDES Permit
No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0142, page 46)
and El Dorado County’s NPDES SWMP (County of El
Dorado 2004).
 Source control programs to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to
recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization,
prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management of public trash collection areas.
 A pond management component for the proposed basins
that shall include management and maintenance
requirements for the design features and BMPs, and
responsible parties for maintenance and funding.
 LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but
are not limited to:
phases and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout project
construction.

Development
Department
and Public
Works
Department
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP’s, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has
prepared storm drain
design reports and
provided storm drain
calculations for all of the
proposed storm drainage
features and
detention/water quality
and hydromodification
basins necessary to serve
this subdivision. These
reports have been
reviewed and approved
by the Community
Development and Public
Works Departments.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 surface swales;
 replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement);
 impervious surfaces disconnection; and
 trees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be placed along the natural drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage patterns. The reduction in runoff as a result of the LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoff reduction credit system methodology described in “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4” (SSQP
2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoff volumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans.
71-43 3A.9-4
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream
of the Project Site and Make Improvements if Necessary.

Prior to submittal to the City of tentative maps or improvement plans the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall perform conduct studies to determine the extent of inundation in the case of dam failure. If the studies determine potential exposure of people or structures to a significant risk of flooding as a result of the failure of a dam, the applicants(s) shall implement of any feasible recommendations provided in that study, potentially through drainage improvements, subject to the approval of the City of Folsom Public Works Department.

Prior to submittal to
the City of tentative
maps or improvement
plans.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
There are no existing or
proposed dams upstream
from this subdivision
and therefore there is no
requirement to perform
the analysis required in
this condition of
approval.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Noise and Vibration
71-44 3A.11-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and
Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors.

To
reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant(s) and their primary contractors for engineering design and construction of all project phases shall ensure that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year of project construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing
construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
 Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and
Sundays.
 All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-
sensitive land uses.
 All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction intake and exhaust
mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with
manufacturers’ recommendations. Equipment engine
shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.
 All motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling.
 Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead of riveting, mixing concrete offsite instead of on-site).
 Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and
generators) as planned phases are built out and future noise Before and during
construction activities
on the SPA and within
El Dorado Hills.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant has
implemented noise
reducing construction
practices included as part
of the required Noise
Control Plan.

Compliance with these
requirements has been
monitored through
construction inspection.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to future construction activities.
 Written notification of construction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet of construction activities. Notification shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction
activities are anticipated to occur and contact information, including a daytime telephone number, for the project
representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-
sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification.
 To the extent feasible, acoustic barriers (e.g., lead curtains, sound barriers) shall be constructed to reduce construction- generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses.

The barriers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site
construction equipment. When installed properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by
approximately 8–10 dB (EPA 1971).
 When future noise sensitive uses are within close
proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise-
attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be located between noise sources and future residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise.
 The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a
construction noise management plan. This plan shall
identify specific measures to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above. The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the construction noise
management plan is approved by the City of Folsom.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project
applicant(s) of the applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries.
71-45 3A.11-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive
Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
 To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted within 275 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
 To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
 All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of
California.
 A blasting plan, including estimates of vibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement of the first blast.
 Each blast shall be monitored and documented for
groundbourne noise and vibration levels at the nearest
sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Before and during
bulldozing and
blasting activities on
the SPA and within El
Dorado Hills and the
County of Sacramento
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Blasting has been
necessary throughout the
course of grading and
construction in this
subdivision. The blasting
has not been within 2000
feet of any sensitive
receptor. The blasting
contractor has obtained a
blasting permit from the
City and the Community
Development
Department has verified
compliance with the
permit through
construction inspection.

Yes
71-46 3A.11-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-
Generated Stationary Sources.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following measures to reduce the effect of noise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:
 Routine testing and preventive maintenance of emergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). All Before submittal of
improvement plans for
each project phase,
and during project
operations for testing
of emergency
generators.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant has
implemented noise
reducing construction
practices included as part
of the required Noise
Control Plan.

Compliance with these
requirements has been
monitored through
construction inspection.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

electrical generators shall be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications.
 External mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate features designed to reduce noise
emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating
generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that
incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment
enclosures shall be oriented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby
noise-sensitive receptors.
 Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of parking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.
 Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of loading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as possible from noise sensitive land uses, constructing noise barriers between loading docks and noise-sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to
provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.

There are no sensitive
receptors within 600 feet
of any on-going
construction and grading
activity in the
subdivision.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-47 4.13-1
(Addendum
)
Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise barriers, as detailed below, to reduce traffic noise levels below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of 60 dB Ldn.
 6-foot tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property
boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini
Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway.
 For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion of the project, a 7-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.
 For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase 1 and
Phase 2 portions of the project, an 8-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be
constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to
White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise barriers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall barrier height may be achieved by utilizing a barrier and earthen berm combination.

Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use.

Barrier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of 117-122 feet from the ultimate alignment of White Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White Rock Road improvements are funded and moving
forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services of a noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual property boundary setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measures Prior to building
occupancy
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The landscape and
streetscape plans for the
subdivision include the
required masonry walls
in the required height
and required locations.

The Community
Development
Department will monitor
compliance during
construction and verify
that the sound walls are
complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy in the
subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a C of O
in the appropriate
phase of
development of the
project.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City of Folsom noise standards.
71-48 4.13-2
(Addendum
)
Interior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been
implemented.
 For the first-row of homes located along White Rock
Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor
building facades shall maintain minimum window
assembly STC ratings of 34.
 Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the
occupants to close doors and windows as desired to
achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

Prior to building
occupancy
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community
Development
Department will monitor
compliance during
construction and verify
that the sound walls are
complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy in the
subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a C of O
in the appropriate
phase of
development of the
project.

Public Services
71-49 3A.14-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control
Plan. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic control plans must follow any applicable standards of the agency responsible for the affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising of planned lane closures, warning signage, a flag person to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by
emergency vehicles. During project construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval of all project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the Before the approval of
all relevant plans
and/or permits and
during construction of
all project phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and
approved all traffic
control plans required
for the construction of
both off-site and on-
site improvements for
this subdivision to
verify compliance
with City ordinances
and to minimize
delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site
elements outside the City
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties and Caltrans).
limits for this
subdivision.
71-50 3A.14-2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Incorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fire
Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if
Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and
Approval.

To reduce impacts related to the provision of new
fire services, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following, as described below.

1. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic
sprinkler systems, the availability of adequate fire flow, and the locations of hydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section

17.57.080 (“Vehicular Access Requirements”). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and barricades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers
Standard, as required by the City of Folsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and
Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for
review and approval before the issuance of building permits.

In addition to the above measures, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall incorporate the provisions described below for the portion of the SPA within the EDHFD service area, if it Before issuance of
building permits and
issuance of occupancy
permits or final
inspections for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom Fire
Department,
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City Fire
Department has
reviewed and approved
all proposed
improvements for the
subdivision. The City FD
will verify adequate fire
flow prior to building
permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

is determined through City/El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 178-acre portion of the SPA.

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements based on the EDHFD fire prevention standards. For
commercial development, improvement plans showing
roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval. For residential development, improvement plans showing property lines and adjacent streets or roads; total acreage or square footage of the parcel; the footprint of all structures; driveway plan views describing width, length, turnouts, turnarounds, radiuses, and surfaces; and driveway profile views showing the percent grade from the access road to the structure and vertical clearance shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklers shall submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a California State Licensed C-16 Contractor.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy of any structures until the project applicant(s) have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Department verifying that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre area of the SPA within the EDHFD service area.
71-51 3A.14-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Incorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs.

The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, and/or EDHFD for those areas of the SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verify to City of Folsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance of occupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases.

Before issuance of
building permits and
issuance of occupancy
permits or final
inspections for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom Fire
Department,
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City Fire
Department has
reviewed and approved
all proposed
improvements for the
subdivision. The City FD
will verify adequate fire
flow prior to building
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit. Page 163
03/02/2026 Item No.5.

permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Traffic and Transportation
71-52 3A.15-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Folsom
Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 1).

To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road
intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection
(Intersection 1).

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented and
when fair share
funding should be
paid.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-53 3A.15-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements at the Sibley Street/Blue
Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2).

To ensure that the
Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 2).

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented and
when fair share
funding should be
paid.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-54 3A.15-1c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to
the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersection
(Intersection 28).

To ensure that the Scott Road (West)/White
Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal must be installed.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-55 3A.15-1e
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside
Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection
(Intersection 41). To ensure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane and two through lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two through lanes and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-56 3A.15-1f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue
Parkway/Middle Road Intersection
(Intersection 44). To ensure that the Oak Avenue
Parkway/Middle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-57 3A.15-1h
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard
Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

To ensure
that the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including “jug handle” ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. 50/Hazel Avenue interchange is a mitigation measure for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel
Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
and Caltrans
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-58 3A.15-1i
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road
Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road
(Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Improvements must be
made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The currently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will
widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line). This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road to be the through movement. The improvements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound right turn lanes, two westbound left turn lanes and two westbound through lanes. This improvement also includes the signalization of the White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With
implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency Before project build
out. Design of the
White Rock Road
widening to four lanes,
from Grant Line Road
to Prairie City Road,
with Intersection
improvements has
begun, and because
this widening project
is environmentally
cleared and fully
funded, it’s
construction is
expected to be
complete before the
first phase of the
Proposed Project or
alternative is built.

Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line
Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County
Intersection 3).
71-59 3A.15-1j
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue
and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10).

To
ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS
between Curragh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part of the County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.

Before project build
out. Construction of
phase two of the Hazel
Avenue widening,
from Madison Avenue
to Curragh Downs
Drive, is expected to
be completed by year
2013, before the first
phase of the Proposed
Project or alternative is
complete. The
applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of
funding of
improvements to the
agency responsible for
improvements, based
on a program
established by that
agency to reduce the
impacts to Hazel
Avenue between
Madison Avenue and
Curragh Downs Drive
(Sacramento County
Roadway Segment
10).

Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-60 3A.15-1l
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way
Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).

To ensure
that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized and separate northbound left and right turn lanes must be striped.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
El Dorado
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-61 3A.15-1o
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50
Eastbound
Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an alternate parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel route. It is preferred to alleviate the congestion on U.S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end of this reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east of Folsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-62 3A.15-1p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16
Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12).

To ensure that the
Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. Protected left-turn signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, and are scheduled for Measure A funding.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n and the City
of Rancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Works
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12).
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-63 3A.15-1q
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel
Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lane must be constructed. This improvement is
currently planned as part of the Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and Community Enhancements Project. The applicant
shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard
(Freeway Segment 1).

Before project build
out. Construction of
the Sacramento 50
Bus-Carpool Lane and
Community
Enhancements Project
is expected to be
completed by year
2013, before the first
phase of the Proposed
Project or alternative is
complete.

Construction of the
Sacramento 50 Bus-
Carpool Lane and
Community
Enhancements Project
has started since the
writing of the Draft
EIS/EIR.

Caltrans This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-64 3A.15-1r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel
Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3).

To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and
Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3).

Transportatio
n
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-65 3A.15-1s
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-66 3A.15-1u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie
City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard, an
auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-67 3A.15-1v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel
Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18).

To
ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18).
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Works and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-68 3A.15-1w
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard
Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

To ensure that Eastbound
U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations
Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom
Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-69 3A.15-1x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5).

To ensure that Eastbound U.S.
50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off- ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed. This improvement was
recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane
improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). 71-70 3A.15-1y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6).

To ensure that Eastbound
U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Eastbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-71 3A.15-1z
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp
Weave (Freeway Weave 8).

To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50
operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an
improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an
improvement may involve a “braided ramp”.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave
(Freeway Weave 8).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-72 3A.15-1aa
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9).

To ensure that
Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9).
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-73 3A.15-1dd
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50
Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 23).

To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50
operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would
merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-74 3A.15-1ee
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29).

To ensure
that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-75 3A.15-1ff
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road
Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32).

To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway
Merge 32).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-76 3A.15-1gg
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road
Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33).

To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway
Merge 33).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit
71-77 3A.15-1hh
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard
Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).

To ensure that Westbound U.S.
50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-78 3A.15-1ii
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue
Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38).

To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Works
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-79 3A.15-2a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use
Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and
Develop and Provide Options for Alternative Transportation Modes. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop
commercial and mixed-use development concurrent with
housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to internalize vehicle trips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To further minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume of single-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent of travel by transit. The project’s fair-share participation and the associated timing of the improvements and service shall be identified in the project Before approval of
improvement plans for
all project phases any
particular discretionary
development
application that
includes residential
and commercial or
mixed-use
development. As a
condition of project
approval and/or as a
condition of the
development
agreement for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

conditions of approval and/or the project’s development agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT.
71-80 3A.15-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in the City’s Transportation System
Management Fee Program. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the City’s existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of
single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and
intersections.

Concurrent with
construction for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-81 3A.15-2c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation
Management Association. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall join and participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association to reduce the number of single-occupant
automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Concurrent with
construction for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-82 3A.15-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Pay Full Cost of Identified Improvements that Are Not
Funded by the City’s Fee Program. In accordance with
Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City’s transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because of the Specific Plan.

As a condition of
project approval
and/or as a condition
of the development
agreement for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-83 3A.15-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Sibley Street/Blue
Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

To ensure
that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left- turn lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-84 3A.15-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Oak Avenue
Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom
Intersection 6).

To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East
Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right- turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-85 3A.15-4c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell
Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street
intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one left-through lane, and two dedicated right- turn lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell
Street/Nesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-86 3A.15-4d
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell
Street/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 21).

To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /Iron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-87 3A.15-4e
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron
Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

To
improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist of one left-turn lane, one shared left-through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/Iron Point Road
Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-88 3A.15-4f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch
Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection
24).

To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road
intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all of the following improvements are required: The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

and a right-turn lane. The westbound approach must be
reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and a through-right lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval of the first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-89 3A.15-4g
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to
the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway
Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33).

To ensure that the Oak
Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be
reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-90 3A.15-4i
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road
Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

To ensure
that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection
operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type of grade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County’s Proposed General Plan.

Implementation of these improvements would assist in
reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-91 3A.15-4j
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock
Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway
Segments 5-7).

To improve operation on Grant Line Road
between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP.

Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and
Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5- 7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-92 3A.15-4k
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer
Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County
Roadway Segment 8)
. To improve operation on Grant Line
Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highway, this
roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This
improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be
implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County
Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.
71-93 3A.15-4l
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs
Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County
Roadway Segments 12-13).

To improve operation on Hazel
Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50
westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento County’s general plan because the county’s policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes. Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.15- 4q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and,
therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-94 3A.15-4m
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line
Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway
Segment 22).

To improve operation on White Rock Road
between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the
Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this
roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County.

The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because of other development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road
(Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).
71-95 3A.15-4n
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire
Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento
County Roadway Segment 28).

To improve operation on
White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson
Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be
implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-96 3A.15-4o
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing
Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1).

To ensure that the
White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-97 3A.15-4p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound
Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1).

To ensure that
the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection
operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
Sacramento
County
Department
of
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane, one shared left through lane and three dedicated right-turn lanes.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1). subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Transportatio
n.

Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-98 3A.15-4q
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel
Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project’s impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-99 3A.15-4r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho
Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an
additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This
improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project’s impact. The Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova
Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).
71-
100
3A.15-4s
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5).

To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the
eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4t). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This
improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project’s impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-
101
3A.15-4t
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City
Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the
northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures
3A.15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue
Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. Improvements Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.
71-
102
3A.15-4u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City
Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6).

To ensure that
Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the
northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off
ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-
103
3A.15-4v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City
Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp
Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50
operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full
auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).
71-
104
3A.15-4w
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

To ensure
that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 8).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-
105
3A.15-4x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch
Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27).

To ensure
that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound
Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge
(Freeway Merge 27).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-
106
3A.15-4y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35).

To ensure that
Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the
northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval of the first
Sacramento
County
Department
of
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be
implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 35).
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Transportatio
n.

Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
71-
107

4.17-1
(Addendum
)
East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6). Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:
 Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150- foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
 Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 150- foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
 Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left- turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is
equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and
 Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization. Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.
71-
108

4.17-2
(Addendum
)
East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:

Prior to issuance of
phase 1 building
permits.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Capital Southeast
Connector -JPA has
executed a construction
contract with
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers
Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 of the Addendum provides a
conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project’s responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee.

The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be
considered to be implemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction of the new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry. Figure 4-4 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

Goodfellow Brothers,
Inc. to construct the
Capital Southeast
Connector from Prairie
City Road to East
Bidwell Street. The
construction contract
was executed in
December of 2020.

Grading and construction
commenced in April
2021 and was completed
in April of 2023. The
project included the
relocation and
signalization of the
existing White Rock
Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The
owner/applicant will pay
the Sacramento County
Transportation
Development Fee prior
to issuance of all
building permits in the
subdivision.
71-
109

4.17-3
(Addendum
)
East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-5 of the Addendum):
 Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second thru lane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);  Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all geometric
improvements, with
the exception of the
second northbound
thru lane prior to
issuance of phase 1
building permits.

Construct the second
northbound thru lane
prior to issuance of
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and approved
the improvement plans
for the construction of
these required
improvements including
the plans for the
modification to the
existing traffic signal at
the intersection of East
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.
phase 2 building
permits.

Bidwell Street and
Mangini Parkway. These
improvements have been
completed and accepted
by the City.
71-
110

4.17-4
(Addendum
)
East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-6 of the Addendum):

 Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared
through-right lane with a 150-foot taper;
 Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;
 Westbound approach: One left turn lane in a 60-foot
pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;
 Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization. Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the future.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with the
exception of one thru
northbound lane prior
to issuance of phase 1
building permits.

Construct the second
thru northbound lane
prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The required
improvements in this
condition have been
completed and accepted
by the City. These
improvements were
constructed as part of the
off-site improvements
for the Mangini Ranch
Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

Yes
71-
111

4.17-5
(Addendum
)
East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 of the Addendum:
 Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 150-foot
pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with the
exception of one thru
northbound lane and
one thru southbound
lane prior to issuance
of phase 1 building
permits. Construct the
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Community
Development
Department has
approved the plans for
the reconstruction and
signalization of the East
Bidwell Street/Alder
Creek Parkway
intersection in
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit. Page 189
03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes. The
second southbound through lane can be dropped south of
Old Ranch Way.
 Westbound approach: One right turn lane, plus one left- turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate
geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions of approval from neighboring projects.
second thru
northbound lane and
the second thru
southbound lane prior
to issuance of phase 3
building permits.
accordance with this
condition.
71-
112

4.17-6
(Addendum
)
White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project
buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate
anticipated U-Turns. Expand or construct a signalized
intersection as follows:
 Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right turns.  Eastbound: A thru lane and a left/U-turn in 300-foot
pocket plus taper.
 Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot
pocket plus taper.
 Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U- turns.
 Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital
Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted
standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy
intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound right turn requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 of the Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Capital Southeast
Connector-JPA project
has been completed. The
Connector project will
implement and complete
Option A in this
condition. The
owner/applicant shall
implement the required
improvements to the
intersection in
compliance with this
condition prior to
issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy
in the Phase 3 portion of
the project.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance of a
building permit in
Phase 3

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Utilities and Service Systems
71-
113
3A.16-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater
Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and Off-Site
Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate
Financing Is Secured.

Before the approval of the final map
and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured through payment of the City’s facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40,
“Facilities Augmentation Fee – Folsom South Area Facilities Plan,” or other sureties to the City’s satisfaction. Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrastructure and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Phase 1 Sanitary
Sewer infrastructure
including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the
Alder Creek Parkway
sewer lift station and
forced main to serve this
subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA
landowners and have
been completed and
accepted by the City and
are currently in
operation.

Yes
71-
114
3A.16-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment
Capacity. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new
wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map–level study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The City obtained a
letter from Regional San
which provides
verification that there is
adequate capacity in the
existing Regional San
conveyance and
treatment system to
accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at
buildout. Confirmation
from Regional San was
required because the
Folsom Plan Area is
served by the existing
Regional San Lift
Station on Iron Point
Road. The City Sewer
Lift Station and Forced
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Main which connects to
the Regional San Lift
Station has been
accepted by the City and
is currently in operation.
71-
115
3A.18-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) of that project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and
improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The owner/applicant has
constructed the
necessary infrastructure
to provide potable water
to the subdivision. The
potable Phase 1 water
infrastructure for the
Folsom Plan Area has
been reviewed, approved
and accepted by the City
and is currently in
operation.

Yes
71-
116
3A.18-2a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance
Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City’s satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The off-site potable
water infrastructure to
serve the subdivision has
been reviewed, approved
and accepted by the City
and is currently in
operation. In addition,
the City has verified that
the off-site potable water
infrastructure is adequate
to serve the subdivision.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.
71-
117
3A.18-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity
(if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected).

If an off-site water treatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on-site WTP alternative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map–level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval of the final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
This condition is not
applicable to this
subdivision. The water
supply for this
subdivision is provided
by the City of Folsom
Water Treatment Plant
rather than an Off-Site
Water Treatment Plant
Yes
Additional Measures
71-
118
Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
AIR-1-
Land
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining
Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce
Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic.

The
City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management
Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of
Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including
representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert’s Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that quarry
trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. Highway

50. City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community
Development
Department and the
Public Works
Department will work
closely to implement the
future Truck
Management Plan
(TMP) and coordinate
responses to any future
entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the
TMP and make sure the
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
approval of a future
TMP

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic.

The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert’s facility until a TMP is adopted.

The City of Folsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quarries, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City’s authority to control the activities of the quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries.

For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a “responsible agency” (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some
discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on
roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the
environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical. requirements in this
condition of approval are
met to the satisfaction of
the City.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described
above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than 296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009. March. Recommended Protocol for
Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version 2.2:7), or such different threshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if
any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than
significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages
implementation of the following measures:
 The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
 A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway
segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. Each
project-level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of
disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project-

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

level analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel trucks), and emission rates
representative of the vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk
determined by in the HRA exceeds 296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by
SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the
following:
 Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the
results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project
applicant(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said
mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom.

No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
 Implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both
directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the
dispersion and filtration of mobile-source TACs
associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the trees reach maturity, which breaks the line of sight between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

These trees should be planted before occupation of any
affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting of these trees in advance of the construction of potentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of
these trees should be maintained through the duration of the quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing
maintenance of these trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s).
 To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy
of the affected residences and schools:
 equip all affected residences and school buildings
developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle
Arresting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air
intake points to the interior rooms;
 use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
 locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from
roadway air pollution sources as possible; and
 develop and implement an ongoing education and
maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

71-
119
Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-1-
Land
Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining
Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce
Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that would
place sensitive
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community
Development
Department and the
Public Works
Department will work
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
approval of a future
TMP.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants.

When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert’s participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety
improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the SPA and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert’s facility until a TMP is adopted. The City of Folsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the
unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quarries, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City’s authority to control the activities of the quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to
accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a “responsible agency” (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)

receptors along
roadways that quarry
trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. 50.
closely to implement the
future Truck
Management Plan
(TMP) and coordinate
responses to any future
entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the
TMP and make sure the
requirements in this
condition of approval are
met to the satisfaction of
the City.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of 45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive receptors to noise generated by quarry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of 3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above.

The City encourages implementation of the following
measures:
 The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
 A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

along the sides of roadway segments that are identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted
using an approved three dimensional traffic noise modeling program (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each project-level
analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City of Folsom for the purpose of
disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project- level analysis should account for the location of the
receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the percentage of heavy trucks). If the incremental increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by
the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be
employed, which may include the following:
 Model the benefits of soundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected
receptors not to exceed a total height of eight feet (two- foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this
mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of
rubberized asphalt at the expense of the quarry truck
applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within
the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s).
 Implement the installation of rubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive
receptors that carry quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of traffic noise levels. The inclusion of rubberized asphalt would provide an
additional 3 to 5 dB of traffic noise reduction. The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

the quarry truck applicant(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project
applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said
mitigation fees are paid.
 To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy of the affected residences and schools:
 Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed
construction plans of residences adjacent to affected
roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks.
 Determine the interior quarry truck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck
conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be
necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck
applicant(s) should pay for the cost of window package
upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated
windows) required to achieve the interior noise level
standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50
Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA. 71-
120
N/A Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off- Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall Before approval of
final maps and
City of
Folsom
The FPA landowners
have satisfied all of the
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

participate in the FPASP owners’ group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructure and off-site water facility alternative improvements. The project applicant shall coordinate with owners’ group to implement the following measures detailed in the Folsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative
Declaration (December 2014):
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-1: Design above
ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and
implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-1: Prepare and
Implement NOX Reduction Plan
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2: Pay Off-site
Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissions
Generated by Construction.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A
Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust
Control Plan.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-1: Conduct
Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and
Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement
Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement
Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western
Spadefoot Toad
issuance of building
permits for any project
phase, the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to the
City’s satisfaction the
fair share contribution
towards
implementation of
Backbone
Infrastructure and Off-
Site Water Facility
improvements and
associated required
mitigation as identified
in the Folsom South of
U.S. Highway 50
Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
(December 2014) or
the Revised Proposed
Off-Site Water Facility
Alternative Addendum
to the FPASP EIR/EIS
(approved December
2012); as applicable.

Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
mitigation measures for
the design and
construction of the Phase
1 Water and Sewer
Backbone Infrastructure
to serve the first of
development in the FPA.

The Phase 1 backbone
Infrastructure was
completed and accepted
by the City in 2018 and
is currently in use in the
FPA and being owned
and operated by the City.

The off-site water
facility alternative
improvements were not
implemented. The water
for the FPA was
provided through the
conservation of existing
water in the City. The
new water supply
alternative was validated
in 2014.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond
Turtle
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson’s
Hawk Nesting Habitat
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson’s
Hawk Foraging Habitat
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored
Blackbird
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting
Raptors
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status Bats
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement
Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-13: Conduct
Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass
Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization
Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure
Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section
401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure
No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of
the U.S., and Waters of the State
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-15: Conduct Tree
Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland
Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and
Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect
Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat
Retained On-Site.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-11: American
Badger

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-1: Comply with
the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property treatment plans
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct
Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site
Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend
Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are
Encountered and Comply with California Health and
Safety Code Procedures.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-1: Prepare Site-
Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and
Implement Appropriate Recommendations.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monitor
Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and
Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control
Plan.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(b): Prepare and
Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control
Plan for the detention basin West of Prairie City Road.  Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-1: Acquire
Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and
Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VII-1: Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVI-1: Prepare and
Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3: North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-4 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V1-4 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-1 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners’ group to implement the following measures detailed in the Revised Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative
Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS (approved December 11,
2012):
 3B.1-2a: Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural
Facilities.
 3B.1-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
 3B.1-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards.  3B.1-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
 3B.2-1a: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX
Reduction Plan.
 3B.2-1c: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during
Construction.
 3B.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors.
 3B.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and
Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to
Acceptable Concentrations.
 3B.4-1a: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during
Construction.
 3B.4-1b Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water
Facilities Climate Action Plan.
 3A.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
 3A.5-1b: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places,

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform
Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be
Avoided.
 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education,
Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if
Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the
Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or
Avoidance as Required.
 3A.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California
Health and Safety Code Procedures.
 3B.7-1a: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement
Required Measures.
 3B.7-1b: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency
Measures Into Final Pipeline Design.
 3B.7-4: Implement Corrosion Protection Measures.
 3B.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
 3B.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-
Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
 3B.8-1b: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials
Management Plan.
 3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.
 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
 3B.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible
Materials.
 3B.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 3B.9-1a: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and
Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
 3B.9-1b: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
 3B.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for
Structural Facilities.
 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet
Protection and On-site Containment.
 3B.11-1a: Limit Construction Hours.
 3B.11-1b: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment
and Staging.
 3B.11-1c: Maximize the Use of Noise Barriers.
 3B.11-1d: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction.
 3B.11-1e: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a
Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints.
 3B.11-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization
Measures.
 3B.12-1: Provide for Continued Recreational Access as Identified in Mitigation Measure 3.14-1a.
 3B.15-1a: Prepare Traffic Control Plan.
 3B.15-1b: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions.
 3B.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert.
 3B.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and
Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize
Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
 3B.17-1a: Implement Construction Dewatering Best
Management Practices.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 3B.17-1b: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program.
 3A.18-1: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply
Availability.
 3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water
Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site
Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate
Financing Is Secured.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11539 – A Resolution of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and Modifying the Assessment Rate of the Folsom Tourism Business
Improvement District

FROM: City Manager's Office

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council conduct the public/protest hearing and if a majority protest does not exist, approve Resolution No. 11539 – A Resolution of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and Modifying the Assessment Rate of the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The City of Folsom established the FTBID in 2012 via the adoption of Resolution No. 9071, pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (California Streets and Highway Code § 36500 et seq.) (the “89 Law”) and Ordinance No. 1171 (which c odified Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 3.100). The FTBID is a benefit assessment district that provides specific benefit directly to the Folsom lodging businesses that are assessed that is not provided to those not paying the assessment. The boundaries of t he FTBID are the boundaries of the City of Folsom.

Benefit assessment districts have been used successfully in Folsom as well as other destination areas throughout the state to improve tourism and drive additional room nights to assessed businesses. The FTBID includes all lodging businesses with twenty or more rooms, existing and in the future, within the boundaries of the City of Folsom.

Resolution No. 9071 established the FTBID with an assessment rate of 4% to be levied for a term of 20 years, commencing on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 13, 2032. Assessments are levied on lodging businesses on the basis of benefit.

03/02/2026 Item No.6.
2 Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation (TEDCorp), serving as the Owners’ Association for FTBID, has recommended to the lodging business owners to pursue modification of the FTBID in order to expand a revenue source devoted to marketing Folsom as a tourist, meeting, and event destination.

The 89 Law and Ordinance No. 1171 allow the Folsom City Council (Council) to modify the FTBID in accordance with Section 36540 of the 89 Law. To initiate the modification process, TEDCorp has requested that Council increase the FTBID assessment rates. The proposed modified assessment rate is eight percent (8%) of gross room rental revenue, increasing the current rate of four percent (4%) of gross room rental revenue. The additional 4% assessment will be dedicated to improvements (as defined in the 89 Law), including but not limited to development of facilities that attract overnight visitation to businesses paying the TBID assessment, infrastructure improvements, and marketing and development efforts directly related to the facilities and associated visitor growth. The increased assessments will provide specific benefit to the Folsom lodging businesses that are assessed that it does not provide to those not charged. To continue the modification process, Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to Modify the FTBID. To complete the modification process, Council must adopt this Resolution of Modification.

Assuming no majority protest at this Public Hearing, the Council could adopt a resolution of modification on the same night. The increased rate and list of authorized expenditures of the FTBID would be effective as soon as practicable following the modific ation proceedings for the FTBID, which effective date is estimated for April 1, 2026.

TEDCorp staff evaluated lodging assessments (both through TBIDs and Transient Occupancy Tax) in nearby jurisdictions. This information is included in Attachment 2, and indicates that an increase of 4% will not affect the competitiveness of Folsom lodging against other lodging choices in the region.

POLICY / RULE

City of Folsom Ordinance No. 1171 establishes procedures for forming parking and business improvement areas supplemental to the 1989 Law.

ANALYSIS

TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS

Tourism Business Improvement Districts (TBIDs) utilize the efficiencies of private sector operation in the market -based promotion of tourism. These special assessment districts allow assessed business owners to organize their efforts to increase tourism. Business owners within the TBID fund the TBID, and those funds are used to provide services and facilities that are desired by and benefit the assessed businesses within the TBID.

TBID benefits:

• Funds cannot be diverted for other government programs;

03/02/2026 Item No.6.
3 • They are customized to fit the needs of each destination; • They allow for a wide range of services and improvements, including, but not limited to, destination marketing, tourism promotion, and sales lead generation; • They are designed, created, and governed by those who will pay the assessment with oversight by the city; and
• They provide a stable funding source for tourism promotion.

FTBID MODIFICATION PROCESS

Holding the final hearing, declaring results of the majority protest proceedings, and adopting this Resolution will result in the modification of the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District (FTBID). The businesses within the FTBID shall be specifically benefitted by the activities and improvements funded by the assessments.

October 24, 2025 WRITTEN REQUEST (COMPLETED)
The TEDCorp, serving as Owners’ Association, has provided a letter requesting modification of the FTBID. This written request allowed the Council to initiate proceedings for FTBID modification at the November 12, 2025 meeting.

November 12, 2025 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO MODIFY FTBID (COMPLETED) Upon the written request of the Owners’ Association, the City may propose to modify the FTBID.

NOTICE (COMPLETED)
A copy of the Notice and Resolution of Intention to Modify were mailed by first class mail to the owners of all lodging businesses within the FTBID. Mailing the notice began a mandatory forty-five (45) day period in which owners may protest FTBID modification.

January 13, 2026 PUBLIC MEETING (COMPLETED)
Allow public testimony on the modification of the FTBID. No Council action required.

January 27, 2026 PUBLIC HEARING
Hold a public hearing on the proposed modification to the FTBID.

If written protests are received from the owners of businesses in the modified FTBID which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessments proposed to be levied, and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than fifty percent (50%), no further proceedings to modify the proposed assessment against such businesses shall be taken.

If the Council, following the public hearing, decides to modify the FTBID as described in the Resolution of Intention to Modify, the Council shall adopt a resolution of modification.

03/02/2026 Item No.6.
4 April 1, 2026 Target date for FTBID assessment modifications to take effect.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

None immediately. In FY24/25, the FTBID assessments generated approximately $1,248,000 in revenue. The proposed modifications would increase the assessment rate from 4% of gross room rental revenue to 8% of gross room rental revenue. In addition, because the FTBID assessments levied on lodging businesses are intended to increase room rentals on lodging business being assessed within the City, there may be an increase in transient occupancy tax and sales tax collections.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This action is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11539 – A Resolution of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and Modifying the Assessment Rate of the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District

2. TEDCorp Lodging Assessment Evaluation

Submitted,

Bryan Whitemyer
City Manager

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Attachment 1

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Resolution No. 11539

RESOLUTION NO. 11539

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM DECLARING RESULTS OF

MAJORITY PROTEST PROCEEDINGS AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT RATE

OF THE FOLSOM TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, Streets and Highways Code §36500 et seq., (1989 Law) authorizes cities and counties to establish parking and business improvement areas for the purpose of promoting tourism; and WHEREAS, the City of Folsom (City) adopted Ordinance No. 1171, which establishes procedures for forming parking and business improvement areas supplemental to the 1989 Law; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 1171, the City Council established the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District (FTBID) on October 23, 2012, by Resolution No. 9071; and

WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1171 authorizes the FTBID Owners’ Association at any time to recommend the City modify the FTBID; and

WHEREAS, the Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation (TEDCorp) has facilitated the request to modify the FTBID; and

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2025 at 6:30 PM at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630, the Council adopted a Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 11506; and

WHEREAS, the public meeting and public hearing to consider the modification of the FTBID has been properly noticed in accordance with Folsom Municipal Code Section 3.100.090 and pursuant to Gov. Code §54954.6; and

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2026 at 6:30 PM at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630, the Council held a public meeting regarding the modification of the FTBID, and the Council heard and received objections and protests, if any, to the modification of the FTBID assessment rate and the levy of the proposed assessment; and

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2026 at 6:30 PM at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630, the Council held a public hearing regarding the modification of the FTBID, and the City Council heard and received all objections and protests, if any, to the modification of the FTBID assessment rate; and

WHEREAS, the City Clerk has determined that there was no majority protest. A majority protest is defined as written protests received from owners of businesses in the modified FTBID which would pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessments proposed to be levied. Protests are weighted based on the assessment proposed to be levied on each assessed business; and

WHEREAS, the City bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that an

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Resolution No. 11539

assessment imposed for a specific benefit or specific government service is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the costs to the City in providing the specific benefit or specific government service, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the specific benefits or specific government services received by the payor.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom as follows:

1. The recitals set forth herein are adopted by the City Council as findings and they are true and correct.

2. The City Council hereby modifies the assessment rate from a rate of four percent (4%) to eight percent (8%).

3. The FTBID modified pursuant to this Resolution will be subject to any amendments to the Folsom Municipal Code chapter 3.100.

4. The City Clerk, or his or her designee, is directed to take all necessary actions to complete the modification of the FTBID assessment rate.

5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the Council.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this xx day of xxxx, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Attachment 2

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Current Regional TBID Rates
Proposed TBID Rates
• Increase TBID to 8% combine with TOT at 8%
• Total of 16% puts Folsom on par with surrounding cities Jurisdiction TOT Rate TBID Assessment TOTAL
CA State Tourism
Assessment
Rancho Cordova 12% 4.50% 16.50% + 0.195%
Placer Valley (Roseveille, Rocklin, Lincoln) 10% $6.50 per room nt (4.55% at $143 ADR) 14.55% + 0.195% City of Sacramento 12% 3.45%, 2.875%, 2.3%, 1.15% by zone +1% STID) 15.45% + 0.195% Elk Grove 12% 4% City; 1% County 17% + 0.195%
Folsom 8% 4% 12% + 0.195%

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council Meeting

Additional Information
Transmittal

Instructions to staff: Deliver original and 30 stapled/double-sided copies to the City Clerk’s Department; City Clerk’s Department will distribute via email and hardcopy to City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk.

Updated: Jan 2026
MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Public Hearing
STAFF REPORT TITLE Resolution No. 11539 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and
Modifying the Assessment Rate of the Folsom Tourism
Business Improvement District
FROM: Finance Department

Staff is providing the attached additional information for the above-referenced agenda item.

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

www.ChooseFolsom.com
Folsom Tourism & Economic Development Corporation
200 Wool Street, Folsom, CA 95630
916-985-2698
January 21, 2026

Honorable Mayor and Folsom City Council
City of Folsom
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630

Re: Request for Postponement of the Public Hearing on the Adoption of a Resolution Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and Modifying the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District

To the Honorable Mayor and Folsom City Council:

I am writing to formally express my request for consideration to postpone the public hearing to modify the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District (FTBID) and declaration of results of majority protest proceedings.

Since its establishment, the FTBID has been a successful mechanism for strengthening the City of Folsom’s tourism economy. In October 2025, the FTBID Owners’ Association, the Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation (TEDCorp), submitted a written request to modify the FTBID assessment rat e. Since October 2025, TEDCorp has conducted outreach efforts and has worked towards building consensus with lodging businesses and community members to garner support for the FTBID modification. TEDCorp is continuing these outreach efforts and respectfully requests that the public hearing, declaration of results of majority protest proceedings, and adoption of a resolution modifying the FTBID be postponed from the January 27, 2026, Folsom City Council meeting, to the February 24, 2026, meeting. As a result of the postponement of the final hearing, the protest period shall be extended, and the results of the majority protest proceedings are expected to be heard at the February 24, 2026, meeting.

Thank you for your consideration. Should you require additional materials or wish to discuss further, please contact me at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Joe Gagliardi
President & CEO

03/02/2026 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
SUBJECT: Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Historic District Commission

FROM: City Clerk's Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff requests that the Mayor, with approval from the City Council, appoint an at-large member to the Folsom Historic District Commission . This appointment will fill the vacant Historic Preservation seat and will complete the remainder of the current term, which is scheduled to expire in December 2027.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 17.52 establishes the Folsom Historic District Commission and defines the Committee’s purpose of the Historic District Commission, in part, as to preserve and enhance the historic, small-town atmosphere of the Historic District; to encourage an active business climate which promotes the development of a diverse range of businesses compatible with the Historic District; to retain the residential areas within the Historic District; to ensure that new residential and commercial development is consistent with the historical character of the Historic District; and to increase the awareness, understanding, and appreciation of the history of the city.

The Commission is comprised of s even members consisting of one representative who is actively involved with historic preservation, one representative who is a resident of the Historic District, one representative who owns a business within the Sutter Street Subarea, two Planning Commissioners, one representative from a Historic District business outside the Sutter Street Subarea, and one architect, landscape architect, or other design professional with expertise in historic preservation.

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
2 The current vacant position is for the representative who is actively involved with historic preservation. The vacancy was created due to the expiration of the previous appointee’s two- year term ending in December 2025. During the recent end-of-year recruitment cycle, the City Clerk’s Department did not receive any applications to fill this seat for the next term. At that time, Council directed staff to advertise another recruitment for the position.

A Notice of Vacancy was published in the City’s newsletter, posted on the city’s website and social media pages, and on the bulletin boards located at City Hall. An email notification was also sent to the City’s Commission and Committee Vacancy Notice subscribers.

POLICY / RULE

In the event of a vacancy in an at -large commission seat, such as the current Historic District Commission vacancy, the City Council possesses the authority to appoint a qualified individual to serve the remainder of the unexpired term , as outlined in Folsom Municipal Code Section

2.35.030 and further reinforced by Section 17.52. 050, which specifically addresses vacancies within the Historic District Commission. These sections stipulate that if an at -large seat becomes vacant before its term concludes, the City Council shall make an appointment for the remaining duration of that term.

ANALYSIS

There is currently one vacancy on the Folsom Historic District Commission for a representative who is actively involved with historic preservation . The remainder of the two-year term for this position will end in December 2027.

The application period for this recruitment concluded on January 8, by which time a total of two applications were received by the City Clerk’s Department from John Lane and Lisa Mealoy. Applications were provided to the Councilmembers on January 9 for advance review and consideration.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Recruitment Packet for Historic District Commission (Historic Preservation Representative)

Respectfully submitted,

Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk

03/02/2026 Item No.7.

Recruitment Packet for Historic District Commission
The Historic District Commission works to ensure the protection of the historic and cultural character of the city’s Historic District. The commission reviews the design and architecture of new and altered structures within the Historic District. It also reviews applications for sign permits, conditional use permits, variances, land divisions, and land mergers within the Historic District. In addition, the commission advises and makes recommendations to the City Council concerning matters associated with historic landmarks, sites, and structures.

Authority: Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 17.52
Rules of Conduct - Adopted December 2022
View agendas, minutes and webcasts
The current recruitment is to fill the the vacant Historic Preservation seat only.

Apply by Thursday, January 8, 2026.

Positions
Vacant, Position 1, Historic Preservation
Cole, Kathleen Marie, Position 2, Resident of the Historic District Gomez, Lisa, Position 3, Business Owner Within the Sutter Street Subarea Herrera, Matt, Position 4, Planning Commission Member
West, Daniel, Position 5, Planning Commission Member
Felts, John, Position 6, Representative from a Historic District Business Outside the Sutter Street Subarea
Cabrera, Jennifer, Position 7, Architect, Landscape Architect, or Other Design Professional

03/02/2026 Item No.7.

Applicants Information
Lane, John
Mealoy, Lisa

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
1/4
Historic District Commission Application
Historic District Commission Seat
Please identify which seat you qualify for:

Representative who is actively involved with historic preservation Applicant Information
First Name
John
Last Name
Lane
Residence Address Line 2
City
Folsom
State
CA
Zip Code
95630
Email
[email protected]
Phone
(916) 837-3375
Employer and Occupation
Teichert Materials. Director of Environmental Compliance Currently Serving on a Commission/Committee?
No
If yes, please specify:

Folsom Residency / Registered Voter Verification
Registered to vote?
Yes
Financial Disclosure / Ethics Training
I understand that commission and committee members must file statements disclosing financial information.

Yes
I understand that commission and committee members must complete ethics and harassment training.

Yes
E-Filed
12/15/2025
06:53:48
Filing ID:
12735

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
2/4
Informational Questions
Why do you want to serve on this commission or committee? Response
My long-held belief is to engage and contribute to my community wherever possible. To this end, I have served my country and volunteered for veteran’s support, youth mentorship and on non-profit boards and community organizations since I was a young person. I would like to continue now by serving my immediate community in the City of Folsom as the active historic preservation member of the Historic District Commission (HDC). In this position, my goal would be to provide unbiased and fair consideration of proposed design and architecture improvements in the District, pertinent projects and, when appropriate, support the City Council.

What do you think is (are) the top issue(s) facing this commission or committee? Response

1. Working with quickly evolving local control land use laws enacted by CA State legislature which are limiting local control.

2. Preserving and protecting the Historic District of Folsom while following the Historic District Design and Development Guidelines, to the extent possible.

3. Achieving continued growth and vibrancy of the historic district while continuing to address real and perceived parking availability issues.

4. Achieving continued preservation of the historic character of the Historic District while also recognizing and balancing continued new projects in both the residential and commercial areas.

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
3/4
Briefly describe how your experiences qualify you to serve on the commission or committee.

Response
I have several areas of experience that would allow me to effectively serve as the active historic preservation member of the Historic District Commission (HDC).

Foremost, I bring an understanding of the challenges and opportunities of historic preservation. I continue to gain this experience through 20+ years of architectural renovation and preservation of homes in the Sacramento area and, more recently, historical design and build of our home within the Historic District. In these examples, I have worked closely with architects and engineers to understand and incorporate historical integrity in both design and construction. I continue to actively invest in broadening my knowledge of the history and character of Folsom and the Historic District. I am a current member of the Folsom Historical Society and the Murer House Foundation.

Secondly, I bring a strong working knowledge of CEQA and the land use entitlement process. I continue to develop my knowledge of local Folsom policy and ordinances related to the Historic District. I have worked primarily over the last 25 years on the applicant side CEQA/NEPA land use entitlements as a project manager, and more recently as the Environmental Manager, for a large local construction company. I also have experience working on the lead agency side of the entitlement process for SMUD as a CEQA/NEPA Project Manager. With this background, I bring well-rounded knowledge of the permitting process and how applicants and lead agencies work together with Commissions, City Councils and County Board of Supervisors to understand and consider all interests in the process.

Lastly, I have experience working with communities, non-profits, business organizations and people. In this capacity, I continue to learn how to work constructively and fairly with different groups of stakeholders with varying degrees of interest and needs. Among my experiences, I have been fortunate enough to be matched with six young men as a mentor through the Big Brothers/Big Sisters (BB/BS) program and am current mentoring a seventh. I later served on the Sacramento region BB/BS Board of Directors. I currently serve on the Board of Directors for the American River Parkway Foundation.

Which commission or committee meetings have you attended? Response
Folsom Historic District Commission, Folsom Planning Commission, Folsom City Council, Folsom Historic District Parking Ad-Hoc, Sacramento City Council, Sacramento County Board of Supervisors.

Truth and Accuracy

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
4/4
Signature
John Lane
Signature Date
12/15/2025

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
1/3
Historic District Commission Application
Historic District Commission Seat
Please identify which seat you qualify for:

Representative who is actively involved with historic preservation Applicant Information
First Name
Lisa
Last Name
Mealoy
Residence Address Line 2
City
Folsom
State
CA
Zip Code
95630
Email
[email protected]
Phone
(916) 804-9381
Employer and Occupation
Strategic Resource Advisors, Inc/ Consultant
Currently Serving on a Commission/Committee?
No
If yes, please specify:

Folsom Residency / Registered Voter Verification
Registered to vote?
Yes
Financial Disclosure / Ethics Training
I understand that commission and committee members must file statements disclosing financial information.

Yes
I understand that commission and committee members must complete ethics and harassment training.

Yes
E-Filed
01/05/2026
21:38:09
Filing ID:
12756

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
2/3
Informational Questions
Why do you want to serve on this commission or committee? Response
As a resident of Folsom for the past 30 years, I value the historic district as a key attraction for the City which must be preserved, while also maintained and improved.

Thoughtful and educated engagement with all stakeholders will ensure that it is protected and an engaging asset for the community for years to come.

What do you think is (are) the top issue(s) facing this commission or committee? Response
Continuing to find a balance between the interests of the various stakeholders:
residents, property owners, business owners, historic community, cultural components, as well as changing zoning and access laws will always be a challenge.

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
3/3
Briefly describe how your experiences qualify you to serve on the commission or committee.

Response
Under contract to the Downtown Sacramento Partnership, I worked on retail business issues for three years in Historic Old Sacramento, which included working with the Sacramento History Museum, California State Railroad Museum, Military Museum, property owners, business owners, residents, the historic community, California State Parks, City of Sacramento, City Historian and the Sacramento Convention and Visitors Bureau. I worked with property owners and the Redevelopment Department to ensure that historic building maintenance was completed, business owners on compliance with items like sign ordinances, negotiating district events, and participated in marketing efforts. Key to this work was understanding that I could be in a room with ten different stakeholders, with ten conflicting opinions, all of which could be correct based on their perspectives. I learned how to negotiate solutions amongst invested and committed community members to find reasonable resolutions.

I served as the Executive Director for the Friends of Sutter's Fort for over seven years, balancing a robust historic reenactors, overseeing business and marketing operations, fundraising, and working with California State Parks on the largest restoration of the Fort since its reconstruction. In this capacity, I served on the Midtown Business Association, representing the Fort and Parks, as their Treasurer. I worked with the City of Sacramento's Parking team and other City Departments. At the Fort I also worked closely with the Sacramento Convention and Visitors Bureau along with serving on the board of Sacramento Area Museums.

I just recently completed a term on the board of the Sutter Club Foundation, which focused on the historic restoration of the Sutter Club in Downtown Sacramento. I am still engaged with the Foundation, although I am now on the overall Sutter Club Board of Directors. In my capacity at the Foundation, I worked with the board on non-profit finance and compliance as well as prioritizing historic projects to ensure access (mainly ADA) as well as appropriate preservation.

Which commission or committee meetings have you attended? Response
Library Commission
Truth and Accuracy
Signature
Lisa Mealoy
Signature Date
01/05/2026

03/02/2026 Item No.7.

LISA MEALOY [email protected]/916.804.9381 CORE

COMPETENCIES
Over 25 years of experience in leadership and change management, strategic planning and community engagement. I excel in managing budgets, creating fiscally sound organizations with multiple revenue streams, and fostering inclusive, innovative cultures. My strong relationship building skills and passion for establishing and building public private partnerships en sures sustainable growth and operational excellence.

EDUCATION

EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION
M.B.A., CSU Sacramento, May 2023
B.A. Political Science, University of California, Davis

Strategic Resource Advisors, Inc.

President 7/2024 - present
Focused organizational and strategic consulting including change management, fiscal oversight, leveraging revenue generation and partnerships in the areas of education, board relations, workforce development and non-profit leadership. Specific projects including community college consortiums to address workforce education in energy and water, education foundation finance.

Key clients: ACWA Foundation, contract Executive Director; Golden State Clean Energy, workforce development; Golden West College Foundation, non-profit finance management

Community College League of California
Chief Operating Officer 9/2020 – 6/2024
Director District Services and Development 3/2017- 9/2020 Leadership
• Built and led a team of dedicated non-profit professionals in a supportive, yet autonomous environment. Fostered open communication, encouraged staff to ask questions, and empowered them to develop confidence in their skills and creativity. Cultivated an inspiring, diverse, and inclusive workplace aligned with the organization's vision.
• Developed strong relationships with multiple Boards, including community college CEOs, Trustees, and Chief Business Officers, to address key challenges such as declining enrollment, campus unrest, environmental sustainability, DEIA, and financial management. Engaged with industry leaders, identified and facilitated grant opportunities, and managed sponsorship relationships. Led the organization’s work on public-private partnerships.
• Led teams of remote consultants and employees which encouraged positive interaction while ensuring KPIs were achieved through consistent communication, engagement and feedback.

Revenue Generation
• Transformed a low-margin, consultant-led, stagnant technical services division into a profitable, growing department. Recognized colleges' reliance on industry expertise, acquired a deep understanding of the services provided, brought in new advisors, and oversaw all engagements to deliver best-in-class services at competitive prices. Successfully marketed and sold district services, driving division growth to $17.5 million in annual revenue. • Expanded corporate partnership and sponsorships into new program areas. Worked with partners to establish better visibility and outreach which drove additional revenues including 32% year over year growth in 2023-24.

Finance
• Collaborated with existing finance team to correct accounting systems to comply with non-profit finance standards including, 990s, restricted funds, pass-throughs, cash held for others, audits.

Evaluated sales tracking system, determined areas of significant losses, worked with staff to correct issues resulting in net positive revenue.

Human Resources
• Guided human resources staff to bring into compliance with current CA law regarding contract labor,

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
mandated reimbursements for employee costs, provided employee training on benefits. Recruited, trained and mentored new employees, supporting ongoing growth and building positive and cohesive teams. Ensured that proper staff management procedures are utilized for employee development, and corrective action plans if needed.

Program Management
• Evaluated each program for operational efficiency and integrity, making changes to staffing and consultants, and restructuring as needed. Hired and supported subject matter expert staff to overhaul all areas of the services including streamlining and correcting accounting issues, bringing areas into compliance, restructuring net negative programs to become profitable. Revised program accounting to track income and expenses which allowed visibility into profitability and opportunities for revenue growth and cost controls. Provided financial and investment performance reporting to various boards. • Managed Library Consortium team including negotiating contract and implementation of system wide ExLibris database system, overseeing accounting processes associated with Library Services Platform and online resource purchasing.
• Programs: $250M JPA multi-college investment trust; $5M charitable gift annuity trust, solar and battery storage, wholesale electricity procurement consortium, system-wide library resources, state and federal policy and procedures, bond financing, student housing, cloud based board management software system (BoardDocs/Diligent).
• Partnerships: Sought out and built new partnerships, specifically in student housing and leveraged connections to address legislative and funding changes which would have derailed projects in process.

Worked with financial partners provide technical assistance to smaller college foundations on issues such as endowments and planned giving.
• Managed all aspects of Corporate Partners and Sponsorship program.

Friends of Sutter’s Fort
Founding Executive Director 10/2009-3/2017
• Transformed docent association into foundation to partner with California State Parks at Sutter’s Fort State Historic Park and local corporations, tourism agencies, donors, education and historic community to create innovative programming and fund restoration efforts through public-private partnerships. Worked in partnership with State Park District Superintendent, board, onsite management and park staff to create cohesive efforts on fundraising, program development and restoration.

Foundation Leadership and Financial Management
• Provided executive level strategic leadership to the organization and board of directors, partnering with California State Parks to cultivate donor relationships and engage stakeholders in public-private partnerships for restoration and programming.
• Developed and executed long-term revenue strategies, overseeing all finances and budget management for a $1.3 million budget (not including one-time major gifts), identifying ongoing revenue streams to stabilize cash flow and support organizational goals. • Managed refresh of retail operations including store renovation, merchandising, staffing and branding.
• Appointed to the Governor’s Parks Forward Transformation team to represent foundations which support State Parks. Presented to California State Parks Leadership Team on Successful Partnership with Cooperating Foundations.

Administrative and Staff Leadership
• Managed administration, finance, human resources, and program operations, including overseeing staff training, volunteer programs, and business analysis. Directly supervised accounting and retail teams, ensuring accurate non-profit finance and accounting controls were implemented. • Supervised staff performance and development, ensuring alignment with organizational goals and supporting ongoing professional growth.
• Administered systems for tracking donations and grants, ensuring compliance with donor stipulations, and reporting financial standing to the Board and senior administration. • Participated in long-term planning and strategic development with the Board and senior leadership, contributing to the establishment of the foundation as a recognized source of support for public-

03/02/2026 Item No.7.
private partnerships and historical preservation efforts.

Program Revenue Development and Fundraising
• Created on-going revenue streams to stabilize income and cash flow by evaluating customer interests, collaborating with staff and marketing efforts to community members, tourism and educational partners. • Led new program development, including events, retail and educational programming that increased annual revenue by 575% during tenure.
• Designed and implemented comprehensive development programs, corporate and foundation relations, and grant writing, securing the largest contributions for educational programming, restoration projects, and exhibits received in Fort history. Solicited, secured and managed private and grant donations for preservation projects, educational programming, and exhibit development. • Collaborated with community organizations, industry leaders, and philanthropic groups to identify funding opportunities, manage donor relations, and secure in-kind gifts for education and preservation efforts. Included sponsorship development, securing major gifts, and managing corporate and community funding agreements.

Campaign Development and Donor Cultivation
• Planned and managed campaigns for restoration and programming, engaging volunteers, Board members, and corporate partners to meet fundraising goals. • Cultivated relationships with on-going and potential donors, establishing systems for donor outreach, recognition, and engagement. Led initiatives to develop deferred and planned giving programs to enhance long-term financial support.
• Oversaw membership development and donor communications, preparing targeted materials to acknowledge and celebrate contributions while aligning messaging with strategic organizational goals.

Marketing and Community Engagement
• Developed and oversaw promotional campaigns to advance the foundation's mission, including the creation of marketing materials and community outreach efforts. Represented the foundation at community events and on boards such as the Midtown Business Association and Sacramento Area Museums Association.
• Engaged in DEI initiatives by collaborating with community leaders, stakeholders, and education representatives to incorporate inclusivity into programming. Created Spanish-language materials for outreach and training.

LRM Consulting
LLC Principal, 2005-2010
Old Sacramento Business Association/Downtown Sacramento Partnership 2006 – 2010 Liaison between State of California, California State Parks, City of Sacramento, museums, property owners and business owners on issues involving business development, preservation community and public private partnerships in Old Sacramento.

Historic Old Sacramento Foundation
Consulted on fundraising, event planning, restoration partnerships, educational programming.

LOCAL

AFFILIATIONS
Sutter Club Board of Directors, Communications Chair January 2025- present Sutter Club Foundation, Board of Directors, Treasurer 2023 - 24 Board of Directors Midtown Business Association (PBID) 2012 - 2017 Finance Chair/Executive Committee 2013 - 2014
Board of Directors California League of Parks Associations 2012 – 2014, 2017 - 2017 Board of Directors, Sacramento Associations of Museums Executive Committee 2016 - 2017 Sacramento Convention and Visitors Bureau “2015 Tourism Champion” Partnership Advisor to the Governor’s Parks Forward Transformation Commission 2015- 2017

03/02/2026 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11540 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,652,000 for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project, Project No.

PW2605, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Developer Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), and Approving the Project’s Inclusion in the CIP, with project funding budgeted at $1,852,000, and Appropriation of Funds

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Resolution No. 11540 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,652,000 for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project, Project No. PW2605, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Developer Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), and Approving the Project’s Inclusion in the CIP, with project funding budgeted at $1,852,000, and Appropriation of Funds

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing (POC) project will provide a grade-separated crossing of East Bidwell Street connecting the future Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail project and adjacent residential and office uses on the east side to various land uses (retail, parks, schools, etc.) on the west side. East Bidwell Street, between Highway 50 and Clarksville Road/Scholar Way, is one of Folsom’s most heavily traveled roadways, featuring regionally significant shopping centers, office parks, medical offices, essential services, and service destinations that generate intense peak-hour congestion and operational challenges. Currently, there is no grade-separated crossing of East Bidwell Street in the immediate area, and additional pedestrian trips across East Bidwell Street could further exacerbate the existing traffic congestion of the corridor. The proposed POC

03/02/2026 Item No.8.
2 is anticipated to be located somewhere between Via Sol and Iron Point Road, as shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 – Conceptual Crossing Locations

The City’s Planning Commission approved a new development at the northeast corner of East Bidwell Street and Iron Point Road for the Sutter Medical Office Building, also known as Broadstone Crossing II, that was conditioned to address the project’s direct impacts on the operations of nearby roadways and major intersections. While the project is expected to bring much-needed jobs and services to the region, it is also adding new traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle demands that need to be carefully managed. On August 20, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Development Agreement between the City, Elliott Homes, and Sutter Health for the Sutter Medical Office Building project. As documented in the staff report and Conditions of Approval, the developer is required to fund up to $2.5 million for design, environmental clearance, and right-of-way acquisition of a pedestrian overcrossing across East Bidwell Street.

On September 9th, 2025, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1354 approving the Development Agreement, formalizing Elliott Homes’ commitment to fund the public improvements, including up to $2.5 million for the design phase of the East Bidwell Street Pedestrian Overcrossing.

Additional operational improvements are also being considered to mitigate the impacts on the adjacent developments. As noted in the development agreement, construction of the POC, along with any future maintenance or repairs, is the responsibility of the City.

POLICY / RULE

In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, Public Works projects or purchases costing $75,049 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

In accordance with California Government Code Section 4526, the selection by a state or local agency of professional services from private architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, or construction project management firms shall be based on demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the required services.

03/02/2026 Item No.8.
3 ANALYSIS

On October 20, 2025, Parks & Recreation staff prepared and released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for engineering design and environmental clearance services for the East Bidwell POC Project.

The scope of the proposed work involves CEQA and NEPA compliance, conceptual alternatives analysis, public outreach, design engineering, and preparation of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates.

On November 17, 2025, staff received two proposals in response to the RFP. A review panel consisting of city staff from the Public Works and Parks & Recreation departments, along with one representative from Elliott Homes, separately evaluated and scored the proposals based on criteria including relevant experience, qualifications of the proposed team, understanding of the project scope, and approach to the work. The methods of analysis are consistent with the requirements of Chapter 10 of the Caltrans Loca l Assistance Project Manual for consultant selection and comply with a qualification-based selection process as required by California Government Code Section 4526. The results of the independent scoring are summarized below:

Firm Name Total Average Score
Wood Rodgers, Inc. 84.6
Dokken Engineering, Inc. 82.2

Following the proposal, review process and discussion, staff elected to hold consultant interviews with both firms. Upon conclusion of the interview process, Wood Rodgers, Inc. was selected as the highest-ranked firm from the selection panel. The Wood Rodgers proposal and interview demonstrated a superior understanding of the project constraints . They identified innovative approaches to public outreach and to developing a federal nexus to begin the NEPA process early.

The Wood Rodgers team was previously selected for both the Highway 50 Class I Undercrossing Project and the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project, highlighting the efficiencies and cost savings that could be realized by combining certain efforts across the projects, including surveys , right-of-way base mapping, and utili ty coordination. Additionally, they presented a well-rounded team with strong technical expertise and a proven track record of success on similar types of projects. As a result, the staff recommends awarding the contract to Wood Rodgers, Inc.

In accordance with California Public Contract Code § 4526, which mandates a qualifications-based selection process for professional services such as engineering and construction management, the City is prohibited from opening or considering sealed cost proposals during the evaluation phase, except for the firm ranked highest based on qualifications. Only after Wood Rodgers was identified as the top-ranked proposer was cost considered during contract negotiations.

The contract with Wood Rodgers, Inc., would be authorized in the amount of $ 1,652,000. The current project budget is summarized as follows:

Design Costs Costs
Wood Rodgers $1,652,000

03/02/2026 Item No.8.
4 Staff Time (Design) $200,000
Design Total: $1,852,000

Preliminary construction estimates for the project range from $9.0 to $14 .0 million. Detailed construction costs will be refined as design progresses, once a preferred crossing location and structure type have been determined.

Although construction funding has not yet been identified, the scope of work for Wood Rodgers, Inc. includes grant application identification and development support services.

Staff will use the City’s standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

The East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project is being delivered as a City Capital Improvement Project consistent with the Broadstone Crossing Phase II Development Agreement.

Under that Agreement, Elliott Homes is obligated to fund the cost of design, environmental clearance, and right-of-way acquisition for a cost not to exceed $2.5 million.

As outlined in the Development Agreement, Elliott Homes has provided an initial deposit of $1.0 million for the project. Once the available fund balance drops below $150,000, Elliott Homes is required to provide an additional $1.5 million. The proposed contract for Wood Rodgers, Inc. and the estimated staff time needed to complete the design are $1,852,000

Funding for the future construction of the POC is not identified as a requirement of the Development Agreement. Future grant applications for construction funding will be brought to the City Council for consideration at a later date.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
If approved, the contract with Wood Rodgers, Inc. would be for an amount not to exceed $1,652,000. The East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project (PW2605) is not included in the FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Plan; therefore, an appropriation is required to fund the contract and staff time associated with the project. Staff recommends an appropriation of $1,852,000 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446). Sufficient funds are available in the Transportation Improvement Fund to support the proposed appropriation and would be fully offset by developer funding deposited for the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Part of this project’s scope of services includes performing both a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review, which would provide environmental clearance for the project's construction. Staff will seek City Council certification of the environmental documents at a later date.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 11540 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,652,000 for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project, Project No. PW2605,

03/02/2026 Item No.8.
5 from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Developer Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), and Approving the Project’s Inclusion in the CIP, with project funding budgeted at $1,852,000, and Appropriation of Funds

Submitted,

Kelly Gonzalez, Parks and Recreation Director

03/02/2026 Item No.8.

Resolution No. 11540

RESOLUTION NO. 11540

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A DESIGN

AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WOOD RODGERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,652,000 FOR THE EAST BIDWELL PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING PROJECT, PROJECT NO. PW2605, FROM A

DEVELOPER FUNDING OBLIGATION OUTLINED IN THE DEVELOPER
AGREEMENT ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL PER ORDINANCE NO. 1354 IN THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND (FUND 446), AND APPROVING THE PROJECT’S INCLUSION IN THE CIP, WITH PROJECT FUNDING BUDGETED AT $1,852,000, AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

WHEREAS, the City desires to design a grade -separated pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing along the East Bidwell corridor between Via Sol and Iron Point Road; and

WHEREAS, on September 9th, 2025, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1354 approving the Broadstone Crossing Phase II Development Agreement, formalizing Elliott Homes, Inc. commitment to fund public improvements, including up to $2.5 million for the design phase of the East Bidwell Street Pedestrian Overcrossing; and

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2025, Parks and Recreation staff prepared and released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for engineering design and environmental clearance services for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing (POC) Project.; and

WHEREAS, on November 17, 2025, staff received two qualified proposals; and

WHEREAS, following evaluation and ranking of the proposals and subsequent interviews, Wood Rodgers, Inc. was selected based on their project understanding, qualifications, approach to the scope of work, and extensive experience with similar projects in the past; and

WHEREAS, staff reviewed and negotiated the scope and work and fee proposal with Wood Rodgers, and both sides have agreed to complete the work for a not -to-exceed amount of $1,652,000; and

WHEREAS, staff costs for management and delivery of the project are estimated to be $200,000; and

WHEREAS, as outlined in the Development Agreement, an initial deposit of $1.0 million has been provided by Elliott Homes, Inc. for the project . Once the available fund balance drops below $150,000, Elliott Homes is required to provide the additional $1.5 million.

WHEREAS, an appropriation of $1,852,000 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project (PW2605) will be required to cover the cost of the contract and staff time and would be fully offset by developer funding deposited for the project; and

03/02/2026 Item No.8.

Resolution No. 11540

WHEREAS, the Design and Consulting Services Agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby authorizes the City Manager to e xecute a design and engineering consultant services agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the amount of $1,652,000 for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project, Project No. PW2605, from a developer funding obligation outlined in the developer agreement adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354, and Approving the Project’s Inclusion in the CIP, with project funding budgeted at $1,852,000: and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $1,852,000 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project (PW2605).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27
th day of January 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Justin Rathel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

03/02/2026 Item No.8.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

03/02/2026 Item No.8.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11542 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc . in the Amount of
$1,121,056.62 for the East Bidwell Street Operational
Improvements Project, Project No. PW2603, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Develop ment Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 and
Appropriation of Fu nds in the amount of $986,523.48 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276)

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11542 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,121,056.62 for the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project, Project No. PW2603, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Develop ment Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 and Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $986,523.48 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The East Bidwell Street corridor is one of the City’s most heavily traveled arterial routes and a key connector to major commercial, residential, and medical destinations. In recent years, the City has been actively coordinating with Elliott Homes and Sutt er Health on the Broadstone II Crossing Project at the corner of East Bidwell Street and Iron Point Road, a significant development effort directly tied to the corridor. These private -sector partners are investing in major infrastructure

03/02/2026 Item No.9.
2 improvements in the Broadstone area, including new internal streets, multimodal facilities, utility upgrades, and circulation enhancements that support the long-term buildout of the district.

On August 20, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Development Agreement between the City, Elliott Homes, and Sutter Health for the Sutter Medical Office Building project. As documented in the staff report and Conditions of Approval, the developer is required to fund the City’s construction of numerous operational improvements along East Bidwell Street and Iron Point Road to mitigate project -generated traffic impacts. These required improvements include turn -lane additions, lane -striping modifications, channelization changes, and updated traffic signal coordination at multiple intersections from Scholar Way to Placerville Road, consistent with the Transportation Impact Study for Broadstone Crossing Phase II.

The Development Agreement establishes that the City will deliver the required East Bidwell Street operational improvements as a Capital Improvement Project, with Elliott Homes contributing an initial amount of $1.445 million towards the preliminary design and right of way costs, and will be responsible for additional construction related costs as identified in the Developer Agreement.

This partnership model aligns the timing of the City’s infrastructure work with the phasing of the Broadstone II development and formalizes the shared responsibility between Elliott Homes, Sutter Health, and the City for mitigating project-related traffic impacts.

On September 9, 2025, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 1354 , approving the Development Agreement, formalizing Elliott Homes’ commitment to fund the public improvements, including approximately $3.6 million for East Bidwell Street operational upgrades and a fair -share commitment toward the pedestrian overcrossing. Since that time, the developer, Elliott Homes, has provided the initial amount of $1.445 million and it has been deposited into the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) by the Finance Department for the project’s delivery.

The Broadstone II Crossing Project Transportation Impact Study identifies several operational deficiencies along East Bidwell Street that must be addressed to maintain acceptable levels of service. Increased traffic from the Sutter medical campus expansion, Broadstone commercial area, and adjacent residential neighborhoods results in congestion at the Scholar Way/Power Center Drive, Broadstone Parkway, and Iron Point Road intersections. These findings underscore the need for targeted geometric, signal, and multimodal improvements, as well as pavement rehabilitation along the corridor, to support mobility, emergency access, and consistency with the City’s General Plan transportation policies.

In addition to the operational improvements required under the Development Agreement, this project provides an opportunity for the City to address existing pavement deficiencies along the East Bidwell Street corridor. By combining pavement rehabilitation with the planned intersection, roadway, and signal modifications, the City can minimize construction disruptions, avoid repeated lane closures, and reduce long -term maintenance costs. Coordinating pavement work with the other project elements allows the full corridor to be brought up to a consistent condition, extending pavement life while delivering the required traffic mitigation improvements in a single, comprehensive construction effort. Pavement restoration efforts beyond the intersection improvements are to be funded through the City’s Measure A Fund (Fund 276) and will be tracked separately for the duration of the project.

03/02/2026 Item No.9.
3 Award of a design contract to Wood Rodgers , Inc. is consistent with the Planning Commission and the City Council’s direction and the obligations codified in the Development Agreement. The consultant will advance the conceptual traffic mitigation measures shown in Exhibit B, incorporate pavement maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and ensure the final design reflects both the developer’s commitments and the City’s long-term operational requirements.

POLICY / RULE

Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $75,049 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

In accordance with California Government Code Section 4526, selection by a state or local agency for professional services of private architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, or construction project management firms shall be on the basis of demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required.

ANALYSIS

In October 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) through Public Purchase that was downloaded by nine prime consulting firms seeking a qualified consulting team to provide comprehensive design, permitting, environmental, and right of way support services. This included direct outreach to various consulting firms and advertisement on the City’s webpage. The RFP emphasized the Public Private partnership, Caltrans involvement, project delivery schedule, public outreach, and constructability.

Staff prepared and released a request for proposal in alignment with a qualification-based selection process as required by California Government Code Section 4526.

Staff received four proposals, all from qualified consultant teams. Four members of City staff and one representative from Elliott Homes participated in both scoring the proposals and the interviews. A matrix of the aggregated scores is listed below.

Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3 Reviewer 4 Reviewer 5 Average Bennett
Engineering
(Ben|En)*
74 84 65 75 88 77.2

Jacobs 79 84 75 56 84 75.6
Kimley-Horn
and Associates,
Inc.
79 61 72 78 81 74.2

Wood
Rodgers*
88 67 70 67 84 75.2

*Interviewed

03/02/2026 Item No.9.
4 Based on the scores and detailed discussion by the committee, two firms were asked to participate in interviews. As a result of the interview process , the selection committee was unanimous in its recommendation of Wood Rodgers, Inc. The initial fee proposal submitted by the consultant for all tasks was $1,639,383.87. As part of the contract award process, the city engaged in scope and fee negotiations with the consultant and determined that a reduced and refined scope was appropriate for the project.

Staff is recommending approval of a contract in the amount not to exceed $1,121,056.62, with authorization to issue a Notice to Proceed along with the related appropriations.

The project’s scope of work for preliminary engineering includes the following tasks:

• Preliminary engineering design and conceptual and final design • Topographic surveys
• Utility coordination
• Right of way determination
• Caltrans Coordination
• Public Outreach

Upon completion of that phase of work, staff will come back to Council for an update of the final design.

03/02/2026 Item No.9.
5 The East Bidwell Street Operational Project is being delivered as a City Capital Improvement Project consistent with the Broadstone Crossing Phase II Development Agreement. Under that Agreement, Elliott Homes is obligated to fund the full cost of the East Bidwell Street / Iron Point Road traffic abatement measures identified in the Transportation Impact Study, with an estimated roadway improvement cost of approximately $3.6 million.

For the roadway improvements, the Agreement requires the developer to provide an initial deposit of approximately $1.445 million at issuance of the first vertical building permit for the Sutter Medical Office Building, followed by an additional deposit of approximately $2.155 million after the initial deposit is expended, for a total of $3.6 million to cover the design, right of way, environmental clearance, and construction costs of the East Bidwell Street operational improvements. The initial deposit of $1.445 million has already been received by the City and is available in the project budget.

Design and construction of the pavement rehabilitation portion along the East Bidwell Street corridor is not part of the developer’s obligations under the Development Agreement and will be funded by the City. For this phase of work, the pavement rehabilitation design and related efforts will be funded out of the Measure A Fund (Fund 276). This portion of work is estimated to be $134,533.14 based on the scope and fee from Wood Rodgers, Inc. Approval of this resolution would appropriate $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276) to the East Bidwell Street Operational Project, Project No. PW2603 , to cover the pavement rehabilitation portion of the design scope.

The proposed project budget and funding to date are as follows:

Funding Sources Amount
Fund 276 Measure A Fund (Proposed) $ 134,533.14 Fund 446 Developer Funding Obligation (Proposed) $ 986,523.48 Total Appropriations (Proposed) $ 1,121,056.62

FINANCIAL IMPACT

If approved, the contract with Wood Rodgers, Inc. would be for an amount not to exceed $1,121,056.62. The East Bidwell Street Operation al Improvements Project (PW2603) was not included in the FY 2025–26 Capital Improvement Plan; therefore, an appropriation is required to fund the contract , funded by the deposit received in the amount of $1.445 million in developer funds and local funds for pavement rehabilitation work. Staff recommends a total appropriation of $1,121,056.62, consisting of $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276) and $986,523.48 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446). Sufficient funds are available in both the Measure A Fund and the Transportation Improvement Fund to support the proposed appropriation.

The appropriation from the Transportation Improvement Fund would be fully offset by the received developer funding that has been deposited into that account for the project.

03/02/2026 Item No.9.
6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Approval of this item authorizes design and preliminary engineering services only and does not approve a specific construction project or any physical changes to the environment. As such, this action is not a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Any future construction of the East Bidwell Street operational improvements and pavement rehabilitation will be subject to separate environmental review under CEQA once a detailed scope of work and project footprint are defined.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11542 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,121,056.62 for the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project, Project No. PW2603, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Develop ment Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 and Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $986,523.48 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276)

2. Wood Rodgers, Inc. Scope of Work

Submitted,

Rebecca Neves, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER

03/02/2026 Item No.9.

Attachment 1

03/02/2026 Item No.9.

Resolution No. 11542

RESOLUTION NO. 11542

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A DESIGN

AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WOOD RODGERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,121,056.62 FOR THE EAST BIDWELL STREET OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PROJECT NO. PW2603,

FROM A DEVELOPER FUNDING OBLIGATION OUTLINED IN THE

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL PER ORDINANCE NO. 1354 AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $986,523.48 FROM THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND (FUND 446) AND $134,533.14 FROM THE MEASURE A FUND (FUND 276)

WHEREAS, the East Bidwell Street corridor is one of the City of Folsom’s most heavily traveled arterial roadways and serves as a key connection to commercial, residential, and medical land uses; and

WHEREAS, the City has entered into a Development Agreement with Elliott Homes and Sutter Health for the Broadstone Crossing Phase II project, which requires the implementation of traffic operational improvements along East Bidwell Street and Iron Point Road consist ent with the approved Transportation Impact Study; and

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1354 on September 9, 2025, approving the Development Agreement and formalizing the developer’s obligation to fund approximately $3.6 million in East Bidwell Street operational improvements; and

WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) in October 2025 in accordance with California Government Code Section 4526 to solicit qualified engineering firms to provide professional design, permitting, and right of way services for the East Bidwell Street Operational Project; and

WHEREAS, four qualified consultant teams submitted proposals, which were evaluated by a selection panel consisting of City staff and a representative from Elliott Homes, and following interviews and negotiations, Wood Rodgers, Inc. was unanimously recommended as the most qualified firm; and

WHEREAS, funds in the amount of approximately $1.445 million have been received from Elliott Homes pursuant to the Broadstone Crossing Phase II Development Agreement and are available for the East Bidwell Street Operational Project to support design and right of wa y costs associated with the East Bidwell Street / Iron Point Road operational improvements; and

WHEREAS, an appropriation from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276) and in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project (PW2603) will be required to cover the cost of the contract; and

WHEREAS, the appropriation from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) will be fully offset by the received developer funding that has been deposited into that account for

03/02/2026 Item No.9.

Resolution No. 11542

the project; and

WHEREAS, the contract will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,121,056.62 for professional engineering and consulting services associated with the East Bidwell Street Operational Rehabilitation Project, Project No. PW2603; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276) and $986,523.48 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project, Project No. PW2603.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 27
th day of January 2026, by the following roll -
call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

03/02/2026 Item No.9.

Attachment 2

03/02/2026 Item No.9.

City of Folsom
East Bidwell Street Operaonal and Pavement Rehabilitaon Project Scope of Work
City of Folsom | East Bidwell Street Operaonal and Pavement Rehabilitaon Project | Exhibit A-1

1. Project Management

1.1. Project Management
Consultant will dedicate a Project Manager to coordinate all consultant operaons with city, including but not limited to, tracking progress of the scope of work and administering subcontracts. Consultant shall provide overall project management, coordinaon, and supervision of project staff to facilitate the performance of the work in accordance with standards and requirements of the city and other applicable standards and requirements. The Project Manager consultant shall prepare and submit monthly project progress reports to city Project Manager.

Consultant will prepare and update the Project schedule monthly or as needed. Project schedule shall be logical, complete, and shall consider city peer reviews. Consultant will provide regular reporng on the project status, including, but not limited to, project schedule including planned and actual target dates, contract budget, general progress on project tasks, and project issues and concerns. and procedures.

This scope assumes project management will be required over an eighteen (18) month schedule.

1.2. Coordinaon and Meengs
Consultant shall conduct a project kick-off meeng and regular monthly meengs with the city, and shall conduct meengs and coordinaon with other stakeholders, city, Caltrans, and other agencies, in monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meengs or technical workshops and focused meengs as necessary. Consultant will prepare agendas and meeng minutes, communicaon and distribuon of project records and informaon, and responses to all internal requests for informaon about the project. This scope assumes that three (3) coordinaon meengs will be held with Caltrans during the Encroachment Permit approval process, and eighteen (18) monthly PDT meengs held in-person or virtually

1.3. Caltrans Encroachment Permit
Consultant will coordinate with Caltrans and submit an Encroachment Permit applicaon for the widening of E.

Bidwell Street, pavement rehabilitaon, and pavement delineaon work within Caltrans’ right-of-way. To facilitate the encroachment permit process and to track expenses within the various funding sources, two (2) encroachment permit applicaons will be submi4ed to Caltrans. One applicaon will cover the intersecon modificaons to the E. Bidwell / Iron Point Intersecon, and the other will cover the pavement rehabilitaon.

Comments received from Caltrans will be tabulated and assessed, and responses will be provided. This scope assumes two (2) rounds of comments / responses will be required to obtain encroachment permit approval for each applicaon.

Task 1 Deliverables
• Project Schedule / Progress Reports (Updated Monthly – 18 Months) • Monthly PDT Meeng Agendas and Notes (18)
• Stakeholder Meeng Agendas and Notes (3)
• Caltrans Plan Comment Review and Response Matrices (2 per applicaon)