Folsom City Council
January 27, 2026

1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
January 27, 2026, 6:30 PM

Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers generally have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:30 PM

Justin Raithel, Mayor

Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Barbara Leary, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Raithel The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item wil l be continued to a future Council meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are generally limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Recognition of 2025 Folsom Holiday Lights Contest Winners

2. Presentation from the Folsom Auburn Trail Riders Action Coalition (FATRAC) on the Public- Private Partnership Supporting the Rebuild of the Folsom Bike Park

3. Presentation from the Folsom Police Department Regarding E-Bikes in Our City: Current Status and Future Direction

3 CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

4. Approval of the January 13, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

5. Resolution No. 11541 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision
PUBLIC HEARING:

6. Resolution No. 11539 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and Modifying the Assessment Rate of the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District
NEW BUSINESS:

7. Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Historic District Commission

8. Resolution No. 11540 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,652,000 for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project, Project No. PW2605, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Development Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), and Approving the Project’s Inclusion in the CIP, with Project Funding Budgeted at $1,852,000, and Appropriation of Funds

9. Resolution No. 11542 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,121,056.62 for the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project, Project No.

PW2603, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Development Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 and Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $986,523.48 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276)

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

4 NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks , using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

This meeting of the City Council is recorded with closed captioning. The recording will be cablecast on Metro Cable Channel 14, the local government affairs channel on the Comcast and DirecTV U -Verse cable system, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The recording will also be video streamed at metro14live.saccounty.gov.The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should co nfirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made av ailable at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Scheduled Presentations
ITEM TITLE: Recognition of 2025 Folsom Holiday Lights Contest Winners

FROM: City Manager's Office

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Folsom City Council will recognize the winners of the 2025 Holiday Lights Contest.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom hosted the citywide Folsom Holiday Lights Contest in December 2025.

The City received 62 entries in five different categories. All participating homes and businesses were featured on the city website for community members to tour the displays.

The entries were judged by Folsom City Councilmembers. Winners received a commemorative sign from the City and were recognized in the City e-newsletter and on city social media pages.

The City of Folsom partnered with local news and media website Folsom Times, which helped promote the contest and provided each winner with prizes from local businesses.

2025 Folsom Holiday Lights Contest winners:
 Holly Jolly Residence – Best overall residence: 488 Rockport Circle  Clark Griswold – Best use of holiday lights (residential): 275 Thorndike Way  Hollywood Christmas – Best use of theme and/or fictional characters (residential): 316 Turn Pike Drive
 Merry and Bright Business – Festive commercial business display: Sutter Street  Illuminate the Block – Best multi-house display: Ledgemont Court

Submitted,

Christine Brainerd, Communications Director

03/02/2026 Item No.1.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

03/02/2026 Item No.1.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentation from the Folsom Auburn Trail Riders Action Coalition (FATRAC) on the Public-Private Partnership
Supporting the Rebuild of the Folsom Bike Park

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Folsom Auburn Trail Riders Action Coalition (FATRAC) will give the background on the public-private partnership supporting the revitalization of the Folsom Bike Park.

The presentation will be delivered by Jamison Larson, Sr. Management Analyst and Deborah Young, Executive Director - FATRAC.

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
No action is requested of the City Council at this time.

Submitted,

Kelly Gonzalez, Parks & Recreation Director

03/02/2026 Item No.2.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

03/02/2026 Item No.2.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentation from the Folsom Police Department Regarding E- Bikes in Our City: Current Status and Future Direction

FROM: Police Department

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom, like many surrounding jurisdictions, has experienced a notable increase in the use of electric bicycles (E-bikes) and e-scooters, particularly by juveniles. In some instances, these electric vehicles have been operated unsafely causing traffic safety concerns.

The Folsom Police Department has worked in collaboration with the Folsom Cordova School District to conduct education at the middle schools and has also conducted enforcement within the community. Staff will provide an overview and update on the most recent data, law, and enforcement and education strategies.

The presentation will be delivered by Chief Adam Green.

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
No action is requested of the City Council at this time.

Submitted,

Adam Green, Chief of Police

03/02/2026 Item No.3.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

03/02/2026 Item No.3.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Special Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday, January 13, 2026 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The special City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm with Mayor Raithel presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present:

Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
Justin Raithel, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: None

ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Homer Limon v. City of Folsom, Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 24-CH000958

2. Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8:

Purchase and Sale of Real Properties Located Along Sutter and Leidesdorff Streets (APN 070- 0042- 003, APN 070-0046-026, APN 070-0046-024 1108 Sutter Street, and 070-0042-002 1118 Sutter Street). Negotiating Parties: City Manager Bryan Whitemyer on Behalf of the City of Folsom, and Brian Martell and Moe Hirani. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Sale

Motion by Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to adjourn to closed session.

Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2

RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that the City Council approved the settlement in the matter of Homer Limon v. City of Folsom.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:31 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Justin Raithel, Mayor

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Regular Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday, January 13, 2026 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:31 pm with Mayor Raithel presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
Justin Raithel, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: None

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The pledge of allegiance was recited.

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang advised that there were no agenda updates.

BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

The following speakers spoke under this item:

1. Amanat Dhaliwal and Anushka Jasti

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Presentation Regarding the Leadership Folsom Project - Folsom Zoo Sanctuary Monument Sign Folsom Leadership Class representatives Erik Bagley and Laura Tinti made a presentation.

2. Presentation Regarding the Final Report for the Folsom Water Vision Utilities Director Marcus Yasutake made a presentation.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2

3. Approval of the December 4, 2025 City Council Special Meeting Minutes

4. Approval of the December 9, 2025 City Council Special Meeting Minutes

5. Ordinance No. 1359 – An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Amending Certain Sections of Chapter 17.104 (Inclusionary Housing) of the Folsom Municipal Code to Update the Methodology for Calculating In-lieu Fees Applicable to Residential Development, and to Incorporate Non-Substantive Cleanup Revisions for Clarity and Consistency (Second Reading and Adoption)

6. Updating Appointment of City Council Representatives to Regional Boards/Commissions

7. Resolution No. 11529 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Additional Non-Exclusive Agreement with an Approved Licensed Contractor to Implement the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program, Utilizing the $200,000 Allocation from the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201)

8. Pulled for discussion

9. Resolution No. 11531 - A Resolution Setting Aside the Approval and CEQA Determination for the 603 Sutter Street Mixed Use Project (PN-17-145) and All Associated Approvals

10. Resolution No. 11532 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Pur Water LLC for $971,500 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Supply of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Water Treatment Plant and $153,120 from the General Fund (Fund 010) for the Supply of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Steve Miklos Aquatic Center

11. Resolution No. 11534 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Amend the FY2025-26 Budget with an Additional Appropriation for Development Engineering Services Contracts in the Amount of $850,000 in the General Fund (Fund 010)

12. Resolution No. 11535- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Amend the FY 2025-26 Budget with an Additional Appropriation for Building Services Contracts in the Amount of $435,000 in the General Fund (Fund 010)

13. Resolution No. 11536- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Contract with M&M Electric in the amount of $87,371 for the Flashing Yellow Arrow Trial Project, Project No. PW2604, from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), and Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $136,111
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to approve Item Nos. 3-7 and 9-13 of the Consent Calendar. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 3

ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

PULLED FOR DISCUSSION:

8. Resolution No. 11530 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (TPMG) to Provide the Folsom Fire Department a Medical Director
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer pulled this item to recommend modifying the agreement from three years to one year. Interim Fire Chief Jason Solak and City Manager Bryan Whitemyer responded to questions from the City Council.

Motion by Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Aquino to amend and approve Resolution No. 11530 to modify the agreement term to one year. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Raithel
NOES: Leary, Rohrbough
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

NEW BUSINESS:

14. Resolution No. 11510 – A Resolution of the City Council Establishing Inclusionary Housing In- lieu Fee Amounts for For-sale Residential Development
Community Development Planning Manager Desmond Parrington made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. Housing Manager Stephanie Henry added additional information.

Motion by Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Aquino to approve Resolution No. 11510 [with the modification to the fee amount of zero dollars for 1,700 square feet].

The City Council discussed the proposed motion.

Amended motion by Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Aquino to amend and approve Resolution No. 11510 [with the modification to the fee amount of zero dollars for 1,500 square feet]. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

OLD BUSINESS

15. Castle Park - Play Structure Replacement Project:

i. Resolution No. 11537– A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Granite Construction, Inc. for Concrete Pavement Work for the Castle Park - Play Structure Replacement Project (PK2501) for a Not to Exceed

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 4

Amount of $72,356 and Appropriation of Measure A Funds (Fund 276) in the Amount of $79,592 Including 10% Contingency

ii. Resolution No. 11538– A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with KYA for Site Work for the Castle Park - Play Structure Replacement Project (PK2501) For a Not to Exceed Amount of $308,309 from the Parks and Recreation Equipment and Capital Fund (Fund 609) in the Amount of $257,755, and Appropriation of Measure A Funds (Fund 276) in the Amount of $55,609 for a Total Budgeted Amount of $313,364 Including a 10% Contingency for the Measure A Portion
Parks and Recreation Park Planner Hannah Perez made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

Motion by Vice Mayor Rohrbough, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 11537. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Motion by Vice Mayor Rohrbough, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to approve Resolution No. 11538. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

16. Resolution No. 11528– A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 11525 and Appointing Members to the 2026 Ad Hoc Charter Review Committee
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer presented information to the City Council.

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 11528 and appoint Vice Mayor Rohrbough to serve as the City Council representative to the Ad Hoc Committee. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

17. Public Meeting Related to Proposal to Modify the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District
Bryan Whitemyer made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 13, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 5

The following speakers spoke under this item:

1. Eileen Reynolds

2. Joe Gagliardi

3. Jim Snook

4. Dean Williams
Chief Financial Officer Stacey Tamagni provided additional information to the City Council.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer spoke about the Intel Folsom campus, the Public Safety Volunteers application deadline and recognized the CERT team that was in attendance. He also spoke about the upcoming community outreach meetings for the Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District.

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Kozlowski reminded everyone to drive safely.

Vice Mayor Rohrbough sent her condolences to Tom Pactol’s family and expressed gratitude for his service and contributions to the city.

Councilmember Leary thanked The Friends of Folsom Parkway for their volunteer work in the Natoma Station area and the staff for their support. She also thanked Communication Director Christine Brainerd for her work.

Councilmember Aquino spoke about hosting an exchange student from Pieve del Grappa, Italy and sent her condolences to Tom Pactol’s wife, Monica and family.

Mayor Raithel thanked Tom Pactol’s wife, Monica, his family, and the CERT friends in attendance and expressed his condolences. He spoke about Tom’s life and invited the public to donate to the two Folsom Lake College scholarships that were established in his name.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned in memory of Tom Pactol at 8:59 p.m.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Justin Raithel, Mayor

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

03/02/2026 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

1/27/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11541 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11541 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision was approved by the City Council per Resolution No. 10780 on January 11, 2022, as part of the larger Phase 2 vesting tentative map.

The action for consideration by the City Council is the approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision. The Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision will create a total of 61 single-family high density (SFHD) residential lots. With the approval of the Final Map, the subdivision process for this phase will be complete.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
2 The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision is located on the north side of White Rock Road, east of Oak Avenue Parkway, south of Mangini Parkway in the Folsom Plan Area (FPA) (please see above).

POLICY / RULE

The Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the City’s Subdivision Ordinance require that the City Council approve Final Maps and Subdivision Improvement Agreements.

ANALYSIS

The Final Map and conditions of approval for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision have been reviewed by the Community Development Department and other City departments. The Final Map has been found to be in substantial compliance with the approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, and all conditions pertaining to the map have been satisfied.

Attachment 5 includes the conditions of approval for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, which included the subphases of 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D.

As an update on progress with the Phase 2 entitlements and project, City Council has approved all final maps with the exception of Phase 2C, making this the last map of this phase to be considered for approval. The table include s information concerning when the condition is required to be satisfied (e.g. at Final Map, building permit, etc.), which City department is Ph 2C

OAK AVENUE PARKWAY

MANGINI PARKWAY

EAST BIDWELL STREET
Ph 2D
Ph 2B
Ph 2A

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
3 responsible for verifying that it has been satisfied, and comments or an explanation on how the condition was satisfied. This subdivision is consistent with the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) in regards to zoning and unit count.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

An Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS was previously adopted by the City Council on March 10, 2020, for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The applicant prepared an environmental memorandum for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project that demonstrates that n o new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the proposed project. As a result, no new environmental document is required, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(b).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11541 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision

2. Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision Improvement Agreement

3. Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision Final Map

4. Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

5. Table of Conditions of Approval for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

Submitted,

Rebecca Neves, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 1
A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 11541

RESOLUTION NO. 11541

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUBDIVISION

IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND ACCEPT OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2C SUBDIVISION, AND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2C

SUBDIVISION

WHEREAS, the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Surveyor as complying with the approved or conditionally approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for the subdivision; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C subdivision; and

WHEREAS, the City Council agrees to accept, subject to improvement, any and all offers of dedication as shown on the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C subdivision.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom that the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C subdivision is hereby approved.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Toll West , Inc. which will do business in California as Toll Brothers West, Inc., in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and accept the offers of dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C subdivision.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 2
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision Improvement Agreement

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
1 No Fee Document Pursuant to Government
Code Section 6103.

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Folsom

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

NAME City of Folsom
City Clerk
MAILING ADDRESS 50 Natoma Street
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Folsom, CA 95630

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE

CITY OF FOLSOM

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2026 by and between the City of Folsom, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and Toll West, Inc. which will do business in California as Toll Brothers West, Inc., a Delaware Corporation hereinafter referred to as “Subdivider”.

RECITALS

A. Subdivider has presented to the City a certain Final Map of a proposed subdivision of land located within the corporate limits of the City that has been prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, the subdivision ordinances of the City, and the Tentative Subdivision Map, if any, of the subdivision previously approved by the City Council of the City.

B. The proposed subdivision of land is commonly known and described as Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision and is herein referred to as the “subdivision”.

C. Subdivider has requested approval of the Final Map prior to the construction and completion of the public improvements (as shown on the approved improvement plans and listed in Exhibit A), including, but not limited to streets, highways, public ways, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, bikeways, storm drainage facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, domestic water facilities, public utility facilities, landscaping, public lighting facilities, park or recreational improvements and appurtenances thereto, in or required by the Subdivision Map Act, the subdivision ordinances of the City, the Tentative Subdivision Map and development agreement, if any, approved by the City. The foregoing improvements, more specifically listed on Exhibit A attached hereto, are hereinafter referred to as “the required improvements”.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
2 D. City Council has required as a condition precedent to the approval of the Final Map, the Subdivider first enters into and executes this subdivision improvement agreement with the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Performance of Work. Subdivider agrees to furnish, construct, and install at his own expense the required improvements as shown on the approved plans and specifications of the subdivision, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department, and is incorporated herein by reference, along with any changes or modifications as may be required by the City Engineer due to errors, omissions, changes in conditions, or changes in facilities as required by the City Engineer. The approved plans and specifications of the required improvements may be modified by the Subdivider as the development progresses, provided that any modification is approved in writing by the City Engineer. The total estimated cost of the required improvements, as shown on Exhibit A, is ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR DOLLARS ($1,374,764).

2. Work; Satisfaction of City Engineer. All of the work on the required improvements is to be done at the places, of the materials, and in the manner and at the grades, all as shown upon the approved plans and specifications and as required by the City’s Improvement Standards and Standard Construction Specifications and any applicable City ordinances or state and federal laws, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

3. Work; Time for Commencement and Performance. Work on the required improvements shall be completed by the Subdivider on or before twelve (12) months from the date of this Agreement. At least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the commencement of such work, the Subdivider shall notify the City Engineer in writing of the date fixed by Subdivider for commencement of the work.

4. Time of Essence; Extension.

a. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The date for completion of the work of construction may not be extended, except as provided in Section 16.36.110 of the Folsom Municipal Code.

5. Improvement Security. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Subdivider shall furnish the City:

a. Improvement security in the sum of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED

SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR
DOLLARS ($1,374,764), which sum is equal to the total estimated cost of constructing the required remaining improvements, and the cost of any other obligation to be performed by Subdivider under this Agreement, conditioned upon the faithful performance of this Agreement; and

b. Separate improvement security in the sum of ONE MILLION THREE

HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
3 FOUR DOLLARS ($1,374,764), which sum is equal to the estimated cost of constructing the required remaining improvements, securing payment to the contractor, subcontractor and to persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment to them for the construction of the required improvements.

c. The Subdivider shall deposit with the City THREE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($3,000.00) for the Final Map. The deposit may be used at the discretion of the City to correct deficiencies and conditions caused by the Subdivider, contractor, or subcontractors that may arise during or after the construction of the subdivision.

d. The estimated total cost of required improvements includes a ten percent (10%) construction cost contingency, the cost of the installation of survey monuments in the Subdivision to guarantee and secure the placement of such monuments as provided by Section 66496 of the Government Code of the State of California, and an estimated utility cost in addition to ensure installation of public utilities.

In lieu of providing the estimate of total utility costs, the Subdivider may submit, in a form acceptable to the City Engineer, certification from the utility companies that adequate security has been deposited to ensure installation.

6. Plan Checking and Inspection Fees. The Subdivider shall pay to the City fees for the checking, filing, and processing of improvement plans and specifications, and for inspecting the construction of the required improvements in the amounts and at the times established by the City.

7. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Subdivider shall indemnify, protect, defend, save and hold the City harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for death or injury to persons, or damage to property resulting from intentional or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of Subdivider or Subdivider’s officers, employees, volunteers, and agents during performance of this Agreement, or in connection with Subdivider’s work, or from any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct, negligent acts, or omissions of Subdivider or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, or by the quality or character of Subdivider’s work. It is understood that the duty of Subdivider to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Subdivider from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply and shall further survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. By execution of this Agreement, Subdivider acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration.

Subdivider shall, at his own cost and expense, defend any and all actions, suits, or legal proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City, its officers and employees, on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgement that may be rendered against the City in any such actions, suits or legal proceedings, or result thereof.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
4 8. Insurance. Subdivider and any contractors hired by Subdivider to perform any of the Required Improvements shall, at their expense, maintain in effect for the duration of this Agreement or until the required improvements are accepted by the City, whichever first occurs, not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Subdivider and it contractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Agreement. The failure of Subdivider or any of its contractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Agreement.

a. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Subdivider shall maintain limits not less than:

1. Comprehensive General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

3. Worker’s Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker’s Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.

b. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

c. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages

A. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Subdivider; products and completed operations of the Subdivider; premises owned, leased or used by the Subdivider; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Subdivider. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

B. The Subdivider’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance of self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Subdivider’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
5 C. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

D. The Subdivider’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

2. Worker’s Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights or subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Subdivider for the City.

3. All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided or cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.

d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best’s rating of not less than A: VII.

e. Verification of Coverage. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Subdivider shall furnish the City with original endorsements affecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

9. Title to Improvements. Title to and ownership of the required public improvements constructed under this Agreement by Subdivider shall vest absolutely in the City upon completion and written acceptance of such improvements by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall not accept the required improvements unless Subdivider certifies that such improvements have been constructed in conformity with the approved plans and specifications, approved modifications, if any, the approved Final Map, City Improvement Standards and Standard Construction Specifications, any applicable City Ordinances or State and Federal laws and after 35 days from the date of filing of a Notice of Completion.

10. Warranty Security. Prior to acceptance of the required improvements by the City Engineer, the Subdivider shall provide security in the amount and in the form as required by the City Engineer to guarantee the improvements against any defective work or labor done or defective materials used in the performance of the required improvements (Warranty Security) throughout the warranty security period which shall be the period of one year following completion and written acceptance of the improvements (Warranty Security Period). The amount of the Warranty Security shall not be less than 10 percent of the cost of the construction of the improvements, including the cash deposit required in paragraph 5C of this agreement, which shall be retained for the Warranty Security Period.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
6 11. Repair or Reconstruction of Defective Work or Materials. If, within the Warranty Security Period or the applicable statute of limitations, whichever is longer, any improvement or part of any improvement furnished and/or installed or constructed by Subdivider or any of the work done under this Agreement fails to fulfill any of the requirements of the Agreement or the specifications referred to herein as determined by the City, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to the City, repair, replace, or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the required improvements. If the Subdivider fails to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, or if the exigencies of the situation require repairs or replacements to be made before the Subdivider can be notified, then the City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work, and Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs plus fifteen percent (15%) within thirty (30) days of the date of billing for such work by City. The parties further understand and agree that the Warranty Security furnished pursuant to paragraph 10 of this Agreement shall guarantee and secure the faithful performance and payment of the provisions of this paragraph during the Warranty Security Period.

12. Subdivider Not Agent of City. Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider's obligations under this Agreement.

13. Notice of Breach and Default. If Subdivider refuses or fails to prosecute the work, or any part thereof, with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time specified, or any extension thereof, or fails to complete the work within such time, or if Subdivider should be adjudged a bankruptcy, or Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed in the event of Subdivider’s insolvency, or if Subdivider or any of Subdivider’s contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees should violate any of the provisions of this Agreement and the City may, but is under no obligation to, serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider’s surety, if any, of breach of this Agreement, or of any portion thereof.

14. Breach of Agreement; Performance By Surety or City. In the event of any such notice, Subdivider’s surety, if any, shall have the duty to take over and complete the work and the required improvements; provided, however, that if the surety within fifteen (15) days after the serving of such notice of breach upon it does not give the City written notice of its intention to take over the performance thereof within fifteen (15) days after notice to the City of such election, then the City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract, or by any other method the City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of the Subdivider, and the Subdivider’s surety shall be liable to City for any excess costs of damages incurred by the City; and in such event, the City, without liability for so doing, may take possession of and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant or other property belonging to Subdivider as may be on the site of the work and necessary therefor.

If the form of improvement security is other than a bond, then the City, after giving notice of breach of the Agreement, may proceed to collect against the improvement security in the manner provided by law and by the terms of the security instrument.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
7 15. Notices. All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid.

Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:

City of Folsom
Community Development Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
ATTN: Rebecca Neves, City Engineer

Notices required to be given to Subdivider shall be addressed as follows:

Toll West, Inc., which will do business in California as Toll Brothers West, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
110 Woodmere Road, Suite 120Folsom, CA 95630
ATTN; Greg Van Dam, Vice President – Land Development

Notices required to be given surety, if any, of Subdivider shall be addressed as follows:

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
ATTN; Daniel P. Dunigan, Attorney-in-Fact

Any party of the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

16. Attorney’s Fees. In the event any legal action is brought to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees, in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled.

17. Assignment. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the assigns, successors in interest, heirs, executors, and administrators of the parties, and the parties agree that the City may cause a copy of this Agreement to be recorded in the Sacramento County Recorder’s Office.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as follows:

SUBDIVIDER

Toll West, Inc., which will do business in California as Toll Brothers West, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

BY: BY:

Print Name: Gregory S. Van Dam ___ Print Name: Scott Esping

Title: Vice President Title: Assistant Secretary

Date: Date:

CITY OF FOLSOM, a Municipal Corporation

DATE:

Bryan Whitemyer

CITY MANAGER

ATTEST:

DATE:_______________________________
Christa Freemantle

CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

DATE:

Rebecca Neves

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DATE:

Steve Wang

CITY ATTORNEY

NOTICE: SIGNATURE(S) ON BEHALF OF “SUBDIVIDER” MUST BE NOTARIZED Certificate of Acknowledgement pursuant to Civil Code, Section 1189, must be attached.

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT – Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

BOND #
PREMIUM:

PERFORMANCE BOND
for
Subdivision Improvement Agreement

WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Folsom, a Municipal Corporation in the State of California, and Toll West, Inc. which will do business in California as Toll Brothers West, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, (hereinafter designated as “Principal”) have entered into an agreement where by principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated __________ 2026, and identified as the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,

WHEREAS, Said Principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement;

NOW THEREFORE, We, the principal, and
, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Folsom, hereinafter referred to as the City; in the penal sum of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR DOLLARS ($1,374,764), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors , and administrators, jointly and severally firmly by these presents.

The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by City in successful enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.

The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on , 2026.

BY
(PRINCIPAL)

BY
(PRINCIPAL)

BY
(SURETY)

(ADDRESS)

(CITY, STATE, ZIP)

(TELEPHONE)

APPROVED AS TO FORM

CITY ATTORNEY

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

BOND #
PREMIUM:

LABOR & MATERIALS BOND
for
Subdivision Improvement Agreement

WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Folsom, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Toll West, Inc. which will do business in California as Toll Brothers West, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, (hereinafter designated as “Principal”), have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated __________ 2026, and identified as the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,

WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Folsom to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California;

NOW THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Folsom and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure, in the sum of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR DOLLARS ($1,374,764), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, cost and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.

It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persona, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on , 2026.

BY
(PRINCIPAL)

BY
(PRINCIPAL)

BY
(SURETY)

(ADDRESS)

(CITY, STATE, ZIP)

(TELEPHONE)

APPROVED AS TO FORM

CITY ATTORNEY

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
13 Attach Exhibit “A”

Licensed Civil Engineer Stamped and Signed Bond Estimate

03/02/2026 Item No.5.
5/16/2025

FOLSOM PLAN AREA
Bond Estimate Summary
for
Toll Brothers - Phase 2C
Total Cost to
Cost Complete
Total Costs Phase 2C 3,422,396$ 1,374,764$
1 of 4

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

FOLSOM PLAN AREA
Improvement Plans for Project Phase 2C
% Cost to
Non-SPIF Reimbursable Quantities Complete Complete
ITEM
NO. QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Site Preparation

1. 625,900 SF Clearing & Grubbing 0.08 $ 50 ,072.00 $ 100% - $

2. 625,900 SF Erosion Control 0.20 $ 125,18 0.00 $ 100% - $ 175,252.00 $ - $
Sanitary Sewer System

1. 736 LF 6" Sanitary Sewer, PVC SDR 26 96.13 $ 70,751.68 $ 100% - $

2. 1,269 LF 8" Sanitary Sewer, PVC SDR 26 182.35 $ 231,402.15 $ 100% - $

3. 10 EA 48" Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 16,857.43 $ 168,574.30 $ 100% - $

4. 60 EA 4" Sanitary Sewer Service 2,492.85 $ 149, 571.00 $ 100% - $

5. 2 EA Connect to Existing Sewer Main 5,000.00 $ 1 0,000.00 $ 100% - $ $630,299.13 - $
Storm Drain System

1. 840 LF 12" Storm Drain, RCP CL III 124.11 $ 10 4,252.40 $ 100% - $

2. 290 LF 15" Storm Drain, RCP CL III 141.53 $ 41 ,043.70 $ 100% - $

3. 370 LF 18" Storm Drain, RCP CL III 151.33 $ 55 ,992.10 $ 100% - $

4. 12 EA 48" Standard Storm Drain Manhole 13,241.86 $ 158,902.32 $ 100% - $

5. 6 EA Type GOL-7 (On-Grade) Drainage Inlet 9,779.79 $ 58,678.74 $ 100% - $

6. 11 EA Modified Type 'B' Drainage Inlet 7,989.97 $ 87,889.67 $ 100% - $

7. 2 EA Connect to Existing Storm Drain Main 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 100% - $ $516,758.93 - $
Subtotal Site Preparation
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer System
Subtotal Storm Drain System
P:\7964\_WEST\Admin\Estimates\TB Phase 2c\Folsom_Bo nd Estimate_2C-10%.xlsx 2 of 4

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

FOLSOM PLAN AREA
Improvement Plans for Project Phase 2C
% Cost to
Non-SPIF Reimbursable Quantities Complete Complete
ITEM
NO. QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Potable Water Distribution System

1. 2,202 LF 8" Water Main, PVC C900 CL 235 109.02 $ 240,062.04 $ 100% - $

2. 8 EA 8" Gate Valve 3,585.09 $ 28,680.72 $ 100% - $

3. 8 EA
Fire Hydrant Assembly (6" Lead &
Appurtenances) 13,282.14 $ 106,257.12 $ 100% - $

4. 60 EA 1" Water Service 2,569.55 $ 154,173.00 $ 100% - $

5. 2 EA Connection to Existing Water Main 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 100% - $ $539,172.88 - $
Concrete

1. 4,429 LF
Modified Type 1 Rolled Curb & Gutter
(w/ 6" AB) 27.53 $ 121,930.37 $ 0% 121 ,930.37 $

2. 17,693 SF Sidewalk (6" PCC/ 6" AB) 8.99 $ 159,060.07 $ 0% 15 9,060.07 $

3. 8 EA Sidewalk Curb Ramp 2,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 0% 20,000.00 $ $300,990.44 300,990.00 $
Streetwork

1. 1,408 Ton Asphalt Concrete (Type 'B') 106.00 $ 149,248.00 $ 0% 149,248.00 $

2. 4,694 Ton Aggregate Base (Class 2) 31.47 $ 147,720.18 $ 0% 147,720.18 $

3. 192 SF Pavement Markings 12.85 $ 2,467.20 $ 0% 2,467.20 $

4. 56 LF 12" White Stripe Limit Line (Stop Line) 6.43 $ 360.08 $ 0% 360.0 8 $

5. 4 EA Street Name Sign on Post 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 0% 2,0 00.00 $

6. 4 EA Concrete Survey Monument 300.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 0% 1,2 00.00 $

7. 4 EA Stop Sign (R1-1) on Post 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 0% 2,0 00.00 $ $304,995.46 304,995.00 $ Subtotal Streetwork Subtotal Potable Water Distribution System
Subtotal Concrete
P:\7964\_WEST\Admin\Estimates\TB Phase 2c\Folsom_Bo nd Estimate_2C-10%.xlsx 3 of 4

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

FOLSOM PLAN AREA
Improvement Plans for Project Phase 2C
% Cost to
Non-SPIF Reimbursable Quantities Complete Complete
ITEM
NO. QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Street Lights & Joint Trench

1. 61 LOT Joint Trench Excavation & Backfill 8,000.00 $ 488,000.00 $ 0% 488,00 0.00 $

2. 1 EA Streetlight Service Point 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 0% 5,00 0.00 $

3. 13 EA LED Streetlight 11,600.00 $ 150,800.00 $ 0% 150,800 .00 $ Subtotal Street Lights & Joint Trench 643,800.00 $ 643,800.00 $ Landscaping & Sound walls

1. 0 SF Landscape & Irrigation 5.00 $ - $ 0% - $

2. 0 SF Masonry Retaining Wall 35.00 $ - $ 0% - $ Subtotal Landscaping & Sound walls - $ - $ Total 3,111,268.84 $ 1,249,785.00 $
Contingency 0 311,126.88 $ 124,978.50 $
Total Cost Estimate 3,422,396 $ 1,374,764 $ Summary Phase 2C
Total Cost Cost to Complete
Site Preparation & Earthwork 175,252.00 $ - $ Sanitary Sewer System 630,299.13 $ - $
Storm Drain System 516,758.93 $ - $
Potable Water Distribution System 539,172.88 $ - $ Concrete 300,990.44 $ 300,990.00 $
Streetwork 304,995.46 $ 304,995.00 $
Street Lights & Joint Trench 643,800.00 $ 643,800.00 $ Landscaping & Sound walls - $ - $ Contingency (10%) 311,126.88 $ 124,978 .50 $ Cost of Improvements 3,422,396 $ 1,3 74,764 $ P:\7964\_WEST\Admin\Estimates\TB Phase 2c\Folsom_Bo nd Estimate_2C-10%.xlsx 4 of 4

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 3
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C
Subdivision Final Map

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CURB AND GUTTERATTACHED SIDEWALK1'
C/L
FRONT LOT CORNER - ATTACHED SIDEWALKTYPICAL 1' OFFSET
R/W - P/LMONUMENT 1' DIA. BRASS DISC(TYP)

12.5' PUELOT
ROAD
REAR LOT CORNERTYPICAL 4' OFFSET
REAR LOT LINEMONUMENT 5/8"REBAR/CAP4'SIDE LOT LINEFRONT LOT CORNER - DETACHED SIDEWALK7'LANDSCAPE TYPICAL 7' OFFSET
ROAD
LOTC/LR/W - P/LMONUMENT, 1" DIA. BRASS DISC.
11' PPACURB AND GUTTER
DETACHEDSIDEWALK6'5'

1.ALL CURVE DIMENSIONS ARE RADIUS, DELTA AND ARC LENGTH. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. DUE TO ROUNDING THE SUM OF INDIVIDUAL DIMENSIONS MAY NOT EQUAL THE OVERALL DIMENSION.2.THIS FINAL MAP CONTAINS 11.455± ACRES GROSS CONSISTING OF 61 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 1 LETTERED LOT. THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS ARE NUMBERED WITH THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCES: 259-275, 286-329. THE LETTERED LOT IS LOT Z. 3."GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY - UPDATE FOR REGENCY AT FOLSOM RANCH" (PROJECT NO. E17053.042) WAS PREPARED BY YOUNGDAHL CONSULTING GROUP, INC IN MAY, 2019, AND IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT THE CITY OF FOLSOM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.4.ALL RESIDENTIAL FRONT LOT CORNERS WILL BE SET WITH A 1" DIAMETER BRASS DISC STAMPED "LS 9379" ON THE SIDEWALK WITH A 1.00 FOOT OFFSET ON THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED. WHERE SIDEWALK IS DETACHED, FRONT CORNERS WILL BE SET IN THE SIDEWALK ON THE SIDE LOT LINE WITH A 7.00 FOOT OFFSET WITH A 1" DIAMETER BRASS DISC STAMPED "LS 9379" (SEE DETAILS ON THIS SHEET).5.REAR RESIDENTIAL CORNERS WILL BE SET AS FOLLOWS (UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE)5.1.FOR LOTS 308-310, AND 313-327 WILL BE SET WITH A 5/8" REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 9379".5.2.FOR LOTS 262-264, 266-271, 287-296, 300-303 AND COMMON LINES OF 259/260, 264/265, 265/266, 297/298, 298/299,299/300, 303/304, 304/305, 305/306, AND 306/307 WILL BE SET WITH A 4.00 FOOT OFFSET ON THE SIDE LOT LINE WITH A5/8" REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 9379" (SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET).5.3.FOR LOTS 259, 265, 272, 273, 275, 286, 298, 299, 304-307, AND COMMON LINES OF 259/261, AND 311/329 WHICH FALLWITHIN A MASONRY SOUND/RETAINING WALL, WILL BE SET WITH A 3/4" BRASS TAG STAMPED "LS 9379" TO THE FACEOF WALL 2.00 FOOT ABOVE GROUND OR ON TOP OF THE WALL.6.LOT Z (PRIVATE ROAD) SHOWN HEREON AS KNOLLBROOK LANE, WHITE CEDAR LOOP, AND AVAZEDO PLACE SHALL BE GRANTED IN FEE SIMPLE TO THE REGENCY AT FOLSOM RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION (FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 2/4/2021, FILING # 4699707) AS A PRIVATE ROAD FOR THE BENEFIT AND GENERAL USE OF THE LOTS SHOWN HEREON.7.THIS MAP IS A PORTION OF THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP SUBDIVISION, TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH RESOLUTIONNO. 10400 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF FOLSOM, MARCH 10, 2020 AND A PORTION OF THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 RESOLUTION NO. 10780 PASSED AND ADOPTED JANUARY 11, 2022 BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF FOLSOM .8.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN THE DEED FROM CATHERINE HOLTHOUSE MANGINI AND ALBERT D. MANGINI (WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS ALBERT D. MANGINI), WIFE AND HUSBAND, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 2002, (BOOK) 20020912 (PAGE) 282, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RE-RECORDED MAY 9, 2007, (BOOK) 20070509 (PAGE) 525, OFFICIAL RECORDS.9.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" RECORDED JULY 15, 2014 AS BOOK 20140715, PAGE 426 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED JANUARY 29, 2016 AS BOOK 20160129, PAGE 0381 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED JANUARY 29, 2016 AS BOOK 20160129, PAGE 0382 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·"PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE FOLSOM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" RECORDED AUGUST 24, 2020, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 202008240893 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 2020 AS DOCUMENT NO. 202010061311 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.10.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND STIPULATIONS AS CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENTENTITLED "WATER SUPPLY AND FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND AGREEMENT", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOLSOM, AND FOLSOM REAL ESTATE SOUTH, LLC, ET AL, RECORDED JANUARY 24, 2013, (BOOK) 20130124 (PAGE) 1382, OFFICIAL RECORDS; AMENDMENT TO THE WATER SUPPLY AND FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND AGREEMENT, RECORDED JUNE 3, 2014, BOOK 20140603, PAGE 959, OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND AMENDMENT TO THE WATER SUPPLY AND FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND AGREEMENT, RECORDED JUNE 3, 2014, BOOK 20140603, PAGE 960, OFFICIAL RECORDS.11.THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2013-1 (WATER FACILITIES & SUPPLY), AS DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MAP, RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2013, AS (BOOK) 20121230 (PAGE) 311, AND IS SUBJECT TO ANY FUTURE ASSESSMENT THEREOF.12.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVER SAID LAND FOR AVIGATION AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, AS GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO AND THE CITY OF FOLSOM, IN DEED RECORDED JULY 15, 2014, (BOOK) 20140715 (PAGE) 427 AND (BOOK) 20140715 (PAGE) 553, OFFICIAL RECORDS.13.THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 17 (WILLOW HILL PIPELINE), AS DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MAP, RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 2015, AS (BOOK) 20150224 (PAGE) 424, AND IS SUBJECT TO ANY FUTURE ASSESSMENT THEREOF.14.THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM, COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18 (FOLSOM PLAN AREA - WIDE IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES), AS DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MAP, RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 2015, AS (BOOK) 20151209 (PAGE) 427, AND IS SUBJECT TO ANY FUTURE ASSESSMENT THEREOF.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 2018 AS BOOK 20181116, PAGE 0465 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

15.THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 23 (FOLSOM RANCH) IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, RECORDED JUNE 8, 2020 AS (BOOK) 20200608 (PAGE) 1611 AS DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MAP (BOOK)130 OF MAPS AT (PAGE)27, RECORDED APRIL 20, 2020 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 202112200572 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 2022 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 202212190567 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.16.THE LAND LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PROPOSED SCHOOL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 3 AS DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MAP, RECORDED JULY 7, 2006, IN BOOK 103, PAGE 9 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES, AS (BOOK) 20060707 (PAGE) 0662, OFFICIAL RECORDS.17.THE LAND LIES WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF CURRENT SCHOOL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 AS SHOWN ON BOOK 103, PAGE 9 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES.18.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT, RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 2004, (BOOK) 20041124 (PAGE) 1838, OFFICIAL RECORDS, THE EFFECT OF A DOCUMENT TITLED "QUITCLAIM DEED", RECORDED MAY 29, 2015, (BOOK) 20150529 (PAGE) 1400, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RE-RECORDED JULY 9, 2015, (BOOK) 20150709 (PAGE) 1401, OFFICIAL RECORDS.19.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ORDINANCE NO. SZC-2009-0001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, ORDINANCE NO. 83-10, AS AMENDED, AMENDING THE AEROJET SPECIAL PLANNING AREA ORDINANCE TITLE B, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE 3" RECORDED MARCH 23, 2009 AS BOOK 20090323, PAGE 1516 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.20.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" RECORDED JULY 15, 2014 AS BOOK 20140715, PAGE 552 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·"ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE FOLSOM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", RECORDED MAY 29, 2015 AS BOOK 20150529, PAGE 1409 AND RE-RECORDEDJULY 9, 2015 AS BOOK 20150709, PAGE 1409, BOTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED JULY 11, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 201707110163OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·"PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE FOLSOM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" RECORDED AUGUST 24, 2020, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 202008240894 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.·DOCUMENT(S) DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 202010060733 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.21.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED IN THE DEED FROM AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION FORMERLY KNOWN AS AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, AS GRANTOR, TO OAK AVENUE HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS GRANTEE, RECORDED MAY 29, 2015, (BOOK) 20150529 (PAGE) 1402, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RE-RECORDED JULY 9, 2015, (BOOK) 20150709 (PAGE) 1403.22.ANY EASEMENT FOR WATER COURSE OVER THAT PORTION OF THE LAND LYING WITHIN ALDER CREEK, TOGETHER WITH ANY RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC FOR FISHING AND RECREATION PURPOSES OVER THE PORTION OF THE LAND THAT IS PRESENTLY COVERED BY WATER DISCLOSED ON ASSESSOR PLAT BOOK 72 PAGE 6.23.PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY (INCLUSIONARY HOUSING AGREEMENT)" PER DN 202104020615.24.PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434(G) OF THE SUBDIVISION ACT THE FILING OF THIS FINAL MAP SHALL CONSTITUTEABANDONMENT OF THE EASEMENTS LISTED BELOW, NOT SHOWN HEREON WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THIS SUBDIVISION:A.PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ADJACENT TO PRIVATE ROAD LOT S AS SHOWN ON "FINAL MAP (PN 20-267), TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2A" PER 451 BM 4.B.DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER 20170329 OR 0528.

NOTES
CITY OF FOLSOM SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIA1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189JANUARY 2026 FINAL MAP (PN 20-267)TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOMRANCH PHASE 2CSHEET OF 5 BEING ALL OF LARGE LOT 2CC OF THAT FINAL MAP "FINAL MAP (PN 20-267), TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2D", FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 464 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST, MDM 2

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

BASIS OF BEARINGS

AVAZEDO PLACE (PRIVATE)
DCR - AREA 3 PERDN 202203171115

WHITECEDARLOOP

WHITECEDARLOOP

SUNNYDRIVEOAKS
(PRIVATE)
(PRIVATE)

VALLEY VIEW
N58°52'01"W76.89'(TIE)

APPROXIMATE C/LOF FUTURE TRAIL

KNOLLBROOKLANE (PRIVATE)OAKRIDGE LANE

CREEKWOOD
S15°17'43"E(R)S17°30'37"W(R)
R=1058.00'Δ=17°29'57"L=323.13'(1)(2)
N21°23'49"W85.75'(1)(2)
N68°23'12"E 149.03'(1)(2)R=606.00'Δ=5°09'05"L=54.48'(1)(2) R=581.00'Δ=49°35'39"L=502.90'(1)(2)
N07°19'23"W 17.12'(1)(2)R=592.50'Δ=3°05'00"L=31.89'(1)(2)N81°57'40"W 24.77'(1)(2) R=581.00' Δ=27°00'26" L=273.86'(1)(2)
N37°13'45"E 109.67'(1)(2)
N07°46'15"W 69.61'(1)(2)N20°59'42"W 59.29'(1)(2)N00°03'10"E 74.29'(1)(2) R=126.00'Δ=16°43'33"L=36.78'(1)(2)N05°10'37"W 48.84'(1)(2)N78°43'42"E 32.82'(1)(2) 273274
305303302301300304
288286290289
292291293294
297296295
298299
275
317 262
260259261
265263
272271270269268267266264
307311328
309308310306
316
320
312
326313314315
329327325318324323322321319
N27°36'57"W88.49'(2)N83°18'14"E80.22'(2)N11°43'25"W 255.27'(2) N20°28'25"W54.16'(2)N40°24'12"W50.42'(2)N52°44'24"W125.32'(2) N35°13'57"W169.78'(2)N68°36'11"E110.43'(2)
N21°23'49"W95.00'(2)
S41°05'24"W(R)S39°51'06"W(R)S36°46'06"W(R)
S34°37'33"W(R)
S32°47'41"E(R)
287
4 DCR - AREA 3B PERDN 202210190586
5 R/W (1)LOT Z
LOT ZLOT S(1)

LOT S(PRIVATE)
(PRIVATE)
(PRIVATE)

LANE (PRIVATE)

DRIVE (PRIVATE)

REGENCYPARKWAY
R=1000.00'Δ=37°37'27"L=656.66'(1)

WHITECEDARLOOP
MANGINI PARKWAYL=144.31'Δ=7°48'54"
30' PUE, LE & PAE (2)

WHITE CEDAR LOOP
REGENCY PARKWAY(1)272273
R=581.00'Δ=49°35'39"L=502.90'(1)(2)N09°45'01"W9.46'(1)(2)N80°14'59"E(R) 22.00'(1)(2)R=20.00'Δ=4°51'03"L=1.69'(1)(2) R=606.00'Δ=5°09'05"L=54.48'(1)(2)
S14°58'06"E(R)R=606': S16°27'43"E(R)R=20': S75°23'56"W(R)44.00'(1)(2)44.00'(1)(2)LOT ZLOT S(1)LOT K(1)LOT G(1) KNOLLBROOKLANE(1)
307
259LOT ZR=20.00'Δ=28°46'55"L=10.05'(1)(2)S17°30'37"W(R)N00°03'10"E74.29'(1)(2)N78°43'42"E16.00'(1)(2)N11°16'18"W 44.00'(1)(2)N78°43'42"E 32.82'(1)(2) LOT D(1)
LOT G(1)

AVAZEDOPLACE
286
27522.14'22.14'
N68°36'11"E2.01'(2)
N68°36'11"E2.01'(2)N21°23'49"W12.50'(2)
N21°23'49"W95.00'(2)N14°54'50"W44.28'(2)
LOT ZLOT X(2)
CITY OF FOLSOM SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIA1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189JANUARY 2026 FINAL MAP (PN 20-267)TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOMRANCH PHASE 2CSHEET OF 5 BEING ALL OF LARGE LOT 2CC OF THAT FINAL MAP "FINAL MAP (PN 20-267), TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2D", FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 464 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST, MDM N
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES.3

RADIAL BEARING (R)

REFERENCESLEGEND

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTPUE

SHEET INDEX NUMBER

OVERALL(OA)PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENTPAE

RECORD DATA PER REFERENCE( )

LANDSCAPE EASEMENTLE

SQUARE FEETSF
1-5/32 COPPER SURVEY MARKER WITH CENTER MARK STAMPED "LS 9379"

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SACRAMENTO COUNTYOR

RIGHT-OF-WAYR/W
SET 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 9379"BOOK OF MAPSBMDIMENSION POINT

CENTER LINEEXISTNG RIGHT-OF-WAY/IODEASEMENT LINEBOUNDARYLOT LINE & RIGHT OF WAYADJACENT PROPERTY LINELOT LINE DOCUMENT NUMBER, ORDNDECLARATION OF CONVENTS AND RESTRICTIONSDCRSET 3/4" BRASS TAG STAMPED "LS 9379"

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONHOA

XRECORD OF SURVEYRS

EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENTEVA

PARCEL MAPPM
(1)451 BM 4 (TOLL PHASE 2A)AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTIONDN 202502270306(2)464 BM 3 (TOLL PHASE 2D)

DRAINAGE EASEMENTDE
100200500SCALE: 1"=100'
SET STANDARD CITY OF FOLSOM MONUMENT WELLSTAMPED "LS 9379" BASIS OF BEARINGSTHE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LARGE LOT K AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP TITLED "TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2A" FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER 27, 2024 IN BOOK 451 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 4, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS AND HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 68°23'12" EAST BETWEEN THE FOUNDMONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON.FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LS 4533" PER 218 PM 17 TOLL BROTHERSAT FOLSOM RANCHPHASE 2A451 BM 4AND CERTIFICATE OFCORRECTIONDN 202502270306 SEE DETAIL "B"ON THIS SHEET
SEE DETAIL "A"ON THIS SHEET
DETAIL "B"SCALE: 1"=20'
DETAIL "A"SCALE: 1"=20'
TOLL BROTHERSAT FOLSOM RANCHPHASE 2B459 BM 8 ANDCERTIFICATE OFCORRECTIONDN 202502270367 FOUND STANDARD CITY OF FOLSOM MONUMENT WELLSTAMPED "LS 9379" PER (1) OR (2)

SAGEWOODLANE (PRIVATE)
FOUND 3/4" BRASS TAG STAMPED "LS 9379" SET PER (2)FOUND 1-5/32" COPPER SURVEY MARKER WITH CENTER MARKSTAMPED "LS 9379" PER (1) SEE DETAIL "C"ON THIS SHEET
DETAIL "C"SCALE: 1"=20' LOT DLOT E
250249248251252LOT A
LOT G
LOT KLOT J 144143142141140139138137136125124112113111
123
LOT H
LOT B
LOT X
LOT C

SHEET INDEX LINELOT X
40' DE 1 PER20170329 OR 0528
40' DE 2 PER20170329 OR 0528PORTION OF 40' DE 3PER 20170329 OR 0528 PARCEL 1A236 PM 10
24' PUE
TOLL BROTHERSAT FOLSOM RANCHPHASE 2D464 BM 3

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

REGENCY PARKWAY(PRIVATE)MANGINI PARKWAY
40' DE 1 PER20170329 OR 0528
40' DE 2 PER20170329 OR 0528
28' R/W PER20170329 OR 0527
251LOT F
(PRIVATE)

28.00'
R/W (1)C/L
28'

SUNNY OAKS DRIVE

46.5'33'
30' PUE/LE/PAE PERDN 202203251660
22'
N20°29'56"W 268.53'(OA)
N66°05'54"E 215.96'
Δ=4°19'38"L=20.54'
N27°36'57"W 88.49'(2)
N40°24'12"W 50.42'(2) N20°28'25"W 54.16'(2)57.08'65.00'65.00'68.18' N83°18'14"E 80.22'(2)N09°51'05"W 92.49'C4 N16°38'07"W 63.08' Δ=9°15'59"L=40.43'R=250.00'
N66°05'54"E 182.98'
174.64'
N78°43'42"E 115.07'22.00'(1)(2)70.22'
R=20.00'Δ=93°45'30"L=32.73' 54.12'26.45'R=30.00'Δ=22°19'54"L=11.69'Δ=33°31'58" L=29.26' Δ=43°16'09" L=37.76'
Δ=48°59'22"L=42.75'Δ=9°39'09"L=5.05'

43.42'

50.00'40.33'Δ=2°02'14"L=9.67'
C2C3Δ=33°25'46"L=29.17'Δ=43°41'47" L=38.13'Δ=28°25'55" L=24.81'R=30.00' Δ=22°19'54" L=11.69'N16°38'07"W 11.44'Δ=3°07'31" L=17.56'Δ=3°39'31" L=20.56'44.47'48.03'Δ=1°52'19" L=9.08'Δ=17°30'01" L=84.91'R=278.00'Δ=42°53'19"L=208.10'(OA)N44°23'34"E(R) 102.65' N60°46'34"E(R) 100.00'N78°16'35"E(R) 100.00'N78°16'35"E 98.28'N78°16'35"E 96.81'N78°16'35"E 96.18' N27°57'20"E 57.11'
N23°54'06"W 100.85'Δ=3°29'17"L=64.41'
N23°54'06"W 96.21'Δ=2°59'09"L=55.13'
Δ=2°42'30"L=50.01'
N23°54'06"W 96.55'Δ=2°42'33"L=50.03'
N23°54'06"W 99.62'Δ=2°42'57"L=50.15'
N49°40'41"W 96.51'40.23'Δ=2°53'31"L=53.40'
N87°41'02"E 98.08'46.66'69.43'N78°43'42"E 97.68'16.00'(1)R=20.00'Δ=28°46'55"L=10.05'(1)(2)N00°03'10"E 74.29'(1)(2)N20°59'42"W59.29'(1)(2)22.96' 104.07'
Δ=9°49'18"L=55.20'Δ=5°12'41"L=29.29'21.96'51.54'18.99'R=278.00'Δ=6°47'02"L=32.92'N16°38'07"W22.50'R=20.00'Δ=88°54'11"L=31.03' R=228.00'Δ=8°21'48"L=33.28'36.27'55.00'

55.75'
R=20.00'Δ=81°07'41"L=28.32'81.88'50.61'50.61'50.61'N15°01'48"W 242.76' N66°05'54"E 98.72'
N66°05'54"E 113.52'

50.09'N66°05'54"E 99.23'
N66°05'54"E 108.69'

50.09'N66°05'54"E 107.40'
N66°05'54"E 103.86'

50.09'55.00'116.94'

88.14'99.03'
N23°54'06"W 97.81'
N23°54'06"W 97.81'

22.00'(1)(2)
7,060 SF299
8,002 SF307
7,605 SF305
4,911 SF3034,782 SF3024,770 SF3015,407 SF300
6,864 SF304
7,272 SF3065,608 SF311
5,314 SF328
5,380 SF3097,815 SF308
7,883 SF310
5,144 SF312
5,400 SF313
5,072 SF329
5,555 SF3276,648 SF293
7,039 SF294
6,314 SF297
6,324 SF296
5,663 SF295
7,265 SF298
R=1058.00'Δ=17°29'57"L=323.13'(1)(2)
S29°18'23"E(R)
S26°19'15"E(R)
S23°36'44"E(R)
S20°54'11"E(R)
S18°11'14"E(R)
S15°17'43"E(R)
N37°13'45"E 109.67'(1)(2)
N11°43'25"W 255.27'(2)
N09°51'42"W(R)
N23°34'04"E(R)N67°15'51"E(R)
N21°51'53"W(R)
S11°13'22"E(R)
N50°33'35"W(R)S86°10'17"W(R)
N76°29'24"E(R)
N07°46'15"W 69.61'(1)(2)
S17°30'37"W(R)N78°43'42"E 86.22'N11°16'18"W44.00'(1)(2) N15°01'48"W 80.56'R=50.00'Δ=125°47'29"L=109.77'
Δ=12°40'44"L=6.64'N66°05'54"E 133.75'N23°54'06"W 95.11'N66°05'54"E 147.02' C1
N75°21'53"E37.28'R=50.00'Δ=133°22'56"L=116.40'C5N09°51'05"W 92.49'N09°51'05"W 92.49'R=322.00'Δ=42°53'19"L=241.03'(OA) R=300.00'Δ=42°53'19"L=224.56'(OA)Δ=16°23'01" L=79.49'

55.10'S74°56'14"W(R)S65°06'56"W(R)72.83'

9.06'
N15°01'48"W 278.71'
C6

53.11'4.00'

96.00'4.00'

4.00'96.00'98.65'4.00'
S32°47'41"E(R)

WHITE CEDAR LOOP(PRIVATE)

WHITE CEDAR LOOP(PRIVATE)

WHITE CEDAR LOOP(PRIVATE)
22'22'22'22'22'
22' 22'22'22'22'
22'22'22'22'
22'22'

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE
326314292 260259
N07°46'15"W 317.58'(1)
N78°43'42"E 90.53'(1)(PUBLIC)
R=1000.00'(1)Δ=25°01'26"L=436.75'

KNOLLBROOK LANE(PRIVATE)
PUE/PAE/LE(1)
PUE/PAE(1)
R/W (1)

30.00'

PUE/EVAPUE/EVA
LOT Z
LOT Z2.362±AC
PUE/EVALOT Z2.362±AC
LOT GPUE(1)R=625.00' Δ=3°30'03" L=38.19'(1)R=625.00' Δ=34°20'35" L=374.62'(1) N32°47'41"W58.00'(TIE)
PORTION OF 40' DE 3PER 20170329 OR 0528Δ=7°48'54"L=144.31' N10°05'21"W 31.07'(TIE TO EASEMENT)
30' PUE, LE& PAE(2)Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3C4C5C6
Radius30.00'30.00'50.00'300.00'322.00'272.00'
Delta22°19'54"20°08'55"27°49'28"6°47'02"6°47'02"6°21'52" Length11.69'10.55'24.28'35.52'38.13'30.21'
CITY OF FOLSOM SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIA1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189JANUARY 2026 FINAL MAP (PN 20-267)TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOMRANCH PHASE 2CSHEET OF 5 BEING ALL OF LARGE LOT 2CC OF THAT FINAL MAP "FINAL MAP (PN 20-267), TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2D", FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 464 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST, MDM SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.

SEE SHEET 5
N4080
200SCALE: 1"=40'
4 TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOMRANCH PHASE 2A451 BM 4 ANDCERTIFICATE OFCORRECTIONDN 202502270306 SEE SHEET 5
LOT D(1)
LOT C(1)
PARCEL 1A236 PM 10
TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOMRANCH PHASE 2D464 BM 3LOT X

SUNN OAKS DRIVE(PRIVATE)

OAKRIDGE LANE(PRIVATE)

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

S16°37'39"E(R)

REGENCY PARKWAY(PRIVATE)
N49°32'31"W 109.91'N20°29'56"W 268.53'(OA)
N80°14'59"E(R)44.00'(1)(2)R=20.00'Δ=4°51'03"L=1.69'(1)(2)9.46'(1)(2)

61.32'N78°43'42"E 108.56'

12.50'(2)N68°36'11"E2.01'(2)22.14'22.14'N68°36'11"E2.01'(2) N21°23'49"W 95.00'(2)

21.25'84.86'

84.92'

72.53'

52.79'

85.75'(1)71.68'
N21°23'49"W 98.52'
N21°23'49"W 98.72'55.00'55.00'22.34'R=606.00'Δ=5°09'05"L=54.48'(1) R=522.00' Δ=7°12'09" L=65.62'R=20.00'Δ=85°33'20"L=29.86'45.00' C2
N68°36'11"E 189.91'

22.00'L1
N35°13'57"W 58.01'R=210.00'Δ=17°30'27"L=64.17'
N52°44'24"W 81.77'Δ=7°07'58"L=34.61'31.02'50.75'Δ=3°42'34"L=15.02'Δ=13°47'54"L=55.87'4.61'53.40'Δ=0°53'00"L=8.05'R=522.00'Δ=9°23'28"L=85.56'R=20.00'Δ=85°33'20"L=29.86' 45.00'

55.00'N21°23'49"W 95.00'
N21°23'49"W 95.00'

76.65'
N54°46'03"E 95.00'
N40°58'09"E(R) 104.72'
N37°15'36"E 104.01'N85°29'17"E 47.47'
R=375.00'Δ=79°28'55"L=520.21'
N85°29'17"E 47.47'R=353.00'Δ=5°14'08"L=32.26'
R=20.00'Δ=107°46'24"L=37.62'
R=478.00'Δ=7°42'41"L=64.33'51.79'6.22'R=188.00'Δ=17°30'27"L=57.45'58.70'23.07'Δ=5°53'42"L=33.13'Δ=10°17'32"L=57.84'Δ=11°40'06"L=65.58' Δ=7°30'32" L=46.26'Δ=14°08'53" L=87.17'Δ=13°55'50"L=85.83' Δ=11°46'45"L=72.57'
Δ=10°42'18"L=65.95'
Δ=10°42'18"L=65.95'
Δ=10°42'18"L=65.95'N04°30'43"W(R) 116.56'43.26'
N06°11'35"E(R) 95.00'50.87'
N16°53'53"E(R) 95.00'N78°27'16"W48.13'
N54°39'41"W 48.36'
N66°05'54"E 131.69'
N27°36'12"E(R) 106.00'

10.79'46.74'N66°05'54"E 129.13'
N39°22'57"E(R) 112.15'55.46'N66°05'54"E 127.54'59.48'
N53°18'47"E(R) 106.00'

7.70'48.14'N66°05'54"E 110.36'63.17'
N66°05'54"E 115.77'

65.11'55.10'

22.00'11.76'R=478.00'Δ=7°02'50"L=58.79'R=20.00'Δ=85°28'43"L=29.84' Δ=5°31'18"L=38.26'Δ=2°14'33"L=15.54'34.44'13.03'Δ=5°15'29"L=36.43' Δ=7°38'26"L=52.94'
Δ=8°57'16"L=62.04'
Δ=8°56'49"L=61.99'
Δ=9°25'24"L=65.29'
Δ=7°24'58"L=51.39'Δ=7°43'18"L=53.50'Δ=7°09'41"L=49.62'Δ=7°38'26"L=52.94'Δ=7°38'26"L=52.94'Δ=1°40'43"L=11.63'N15°01'48"W 64.74'R=20.00' Δ=86°14'30"L=30.10'

47.25'28.50'
N05°04'59"W 100.01'Δ=6°58'55"L=70.80'
N04°30'43"W 100.56'Δ=5°01'43"L=50.99'
N00°44'46"E(R) 98.10'Δ=5°46'45"L=58.60'
N08°23'12"E(R) 96.37'Δ=6°30'01"L=65.92'
N17°20'28"E(R) 96.02'Δ=7°35'57"L=77.06'
N26°17'17"E(R) 97.49'Δ=7°36'10"L=77.09'
N26°17'17"E 101.21'Δ=6°24'55"L=65.05'
N54°32'10"E 108.42'Δ=3°41'13"L=37.39' N81°57'40"W24.77'(1)(2)R=592.50'Δ=3°05'00"L=31.89'(1)(2) N07°19'23"W17.12'(1)(2)N54°32'10"E 111.50'Δ=5°19'21"L=53.97' N58°00'38"E(R) 116.89'Δ=5°36'55"L=56.94' N65°39'04"E(R) 124.62'Δ=6°51'01"L=69.46'

60.68'

72.70'
Δ=6°58'12"L=70.68' N11°16'18"W 101.77'
Δ=2°14'57" L=22.81'R=126.00' Δ=16°43'33" L=36.78'(1)(2) N05°10'37"W48.84'(1)(2)32.82'(1)6,732 SF2606,774 SF259 7,934 SF261
8,501 SF265
6,053 SF263
6,384 SF2725,075 SF2715,365 SF2705,771 SF2696,680 SF2686,718 SF2676,439 SF266 5,818 SF264
7,359 SF2627,987 SF324
6,737 SF3235,722 SF3225,459 SF3219,569 SF319
6,388 SF316
5,975 SF320
6,343 SF3266,722 SF314
6,582 SF315
8,379 SF325
7,260 SF3186,728 SF317
6,459 SF2887,285 SF286
7,087 SF290
6,951 SF289
6,142 SF292
7,196 SF291
7,052 SF275
6,710 SF2735,424 SF274
R=278.00'Δ=42°53'19"L=208.10'(OA) N44°23'34"E(R) 102.65' R=300.00'Δ=42°53'19"L=224.56'(OA)
R=322.00'Δ=42°53'19"L=241.03'(OA)
N66°05'54"E 98.72'
N66°05'54"E 113.52'9.06'N15°01'48"W 242.76'(OA)104.07'N15°01'48"W 278.71'(OA) N78°43'42"E 115.07'22.00'22.00'N11°16'18"W44.00'(1)(2)
N73°17'29"E(R) 133.38'S65°50'52"W(R)R=581.00'Δ=27°00'26"L=273.86'(1)(2) S39°51'06"W(R)S36°46'06"W(R)
S30°56'20"W(R)
S24°31'24"W(R)
S16°55'14"W(R)
S09°19'18"W(R)
S02°49'16"W(R)
S02°57'28"E(R)
S07°59'11"E(R)
R=581.00'Δ=49°35'39"L=502.90'(1)(2)N09°45'01"W21.22'S14°58'06"E(R) R=500.00' Δ=11°43'30"L=102.32'
R=606.00':S16°27'43"E(R)R=20.00':S75°23'56"W(R)
N68°23'12"E 149.03'(2)
N68°36'11"E 169.67'
N21°23'49"W 98.25'(2)N14°54'50"W44.28'(2)

71.68'
N68°36'11"E 174.67'

76.68'
R=397.00'Δ=7°45'51"L=53.80'
N85°29'17"E 47.47'
R=397.00'Δ=79°28'55"L=550.73'
S06°45'16"E(R)
S35°42'41"W(R)
S43°07'39"W(R)S50°50'57"W(R)S41°05'24"W(R)S46°24'45"W(R) S34°37'33"W(R)
S52°01'40"W(R)S58°52'40"W(R)
S67°27'41"W(R)

50.43'

37.57'
N65°52'49"E 94.14'
R=353.00'Δ=79°28'55"L=489.69'
C1
N35°13'57"W 58.01'
N37°15'36"E(R)N52°44'24"W 81.77'
S43°09'17"W(R)S53°26'50"W(R)S65°06'56"W(R)
N52°44'24"W 81.77'
N52°44'24"W 125.32'(2)
N35°13'57"W 169.78'(2)
C3N35°13'57"W 58.01'R=500.00'Δ=13°45'26"L=120.05' Δ=8°30'28"L=77.51' N55°39'03"E(R)R=500':N68°31'29"E(R)R=375':S17°56'16"E(R)

98.65'4.00'
L2 33.75'

76.68'N68°36'11"E 110.43'(2)
N68°36'11"E 97.90'5,225 SF287

WHITE CEDAR LOOP(PRIVATE)

WHITE CEDAR LOOP(PRIVATE)
22'22'22'

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE
22'
22'22'22'22'22'22'
22'22'
22'22'
22'22'

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUEAVAZEDO PLACE(PRIVATE)

12.5' PUE

12.5' PUE
328313 327293 307
7' PUE(2)
N68°23'12"E 828.22'(1)(OA)N09°45'01"W 51.37'(1)
R=625.00'Δ=103°50'33"L=1132.75'(1)(OA)
N78°43'42"E 90.53'(1)24'
174.64'

KNOLLBROOK LANE(PRIVATE)

WHITE CEDAR LOOP(PRIVATE)
Δ=34°20'35"L=374.62'(1)
Δ=40°33'19"L=442.39'(1)
Δ=20°27'28"L=223.16'(1)
LOT Z2.362±AC

2.362±ACPUE/EVA

2.362±ACPUE/EVA
LOT Z

PUE/EVA
LOT Z
LOT Z
PUE/EVA(1)
Δ=4°59'08"L=54.38'(1) Curve TableCurve #C1C2C3Radius375.00'375.00'232.00'Delta13°25'33"3°27'34"17°30'27"Length87.87'22.64'70.89'Line TableLine #L1L2BearingN9°45'01"WN9°45'01"WLength11.76'11.76' CITY OF FOLSOM SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIA1025 Creekside Ridge Drive, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678(916) 773-1189JANUARY 2026 FINAL MAP (PN 20-267)TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOMRANCH PHASE 2CSHEET OF 5 BEING ALL OF LARGE LOT 2CC OF THAT FINAL MAP "FINAL MAP (PN 20-267), TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2D", FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 464 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST, MDM SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.

N4080
200SCALE: 1"=40'
5 TOLL BROTHERS ATFOLSOM RANCH PHASE2A451 BM 4AND CERTIFICATE OFCORRECTIONDN 202502270306 SEE SHEET 4SEE SHEET 4
LOT GPUE(1)
LOT KPUE(1)
LOT GPUE(1)
TOLL BROTHERS ATFOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2B459 BM 8AND CERTIFICATE OFCORRECTIONDN 202502270367 TOLL BROTHERS ATFOLSOM RANCHPHASE 2D 464 BM 3LOT X

OAKRIDGE DRIVE(PRIVATE)

SAGEWOOD LANE(PRIVATE)

VALLEY VIEW LANE(PRIVATE)
LOT B
TOLL BROTHERS ATFOLSOM RANCHPHASE 2D464 BM 3
TOLL BROTHERS ATFOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2A451 BM 4AND CERTIFICATE OFCORRECTION DN 202502270306 LOT X

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 4
Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2
Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 5
Table of Conditions of Approval for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 20-267)

NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST BIDWELL STREET AND WHITE ROCK ROAD

SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
No. Mitigation
Measure Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department Comments Condition
Satisfied

1. Final Development Plans
The owner/applicant shall submit final site development plans to the Community Development Department that shall substantially conform to the exhibits referenced below:

1. Illustrative Master Plan Exhibit, dated August 31, 2020

2. Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, dated
September 17, 2021

3. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, dated September 17, 2021

4. Preliminary Utility Plan, dated September 17, 2021

5. Preliminary Landscape Plan and Details, dated January 24, 2020

6. Preliminary Entry Exhibit, dated April 28, 2021

7. Preliminary Wall and Fence Exhibit, dated April 28, 2021

8. Preliminary Tree Preservation Exhibit, dated October 13, 2021

9. Minor Administrative Modification Exhibit, dated September 17, 2021

10. Inclusionary Housing Letter, dated November 16, 2020

11. Project Narrative

The Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is approved for the development of a 329-unit single-family residential subdivision (Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2). Implementation of the project shall be consistent with the above referenced items and these conditions of approval.

G, I, M, B

CD (P)(E)
The Community
Development Department has
reviewed and approved the
improvement plans and the
final map for the project. The
approved improvement plans
are in substantial compliance
with the preliminary grading
and drainage plans, the
preliminary site and utility
plans, the tree
preservation/removal plans,
the preliminary landscape
plans and the community
design guidelines.

The final map for this
subdivision is in substantial
compliance with the approved
Vesting Tentative
Subdivision Map.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 20-267)

NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST BIDWELL STREET AND WHITE ROCK ROAD

SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
No. Mitigation
Measure Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department Comments Condition
Satisfied

2. Plan Submittal
All civil engineering, improvement, and landscape and irrigation plans, shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department for review and approval to ensure conformance with this approval and with relevant codes, policies, standards and other requirements of the City of Folsom.

G, I

CD (P)(E)
Improvement plans for
Mangini Parkway, Regency
Parkway and the subdivision
have been approved by the
City and these improvements
are currently under
construction.

Yes

3. Validity
This approval of the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map shall be valid for a period of twenty four months pursuant to Section 16.16.110A of the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The term of the approved Inclusionary Housing Agreement shall track the term of the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, as may be extended from time to time pursuant to Section 16.16.110.A and 16.16.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act.

M

CD (P)
The small-lot vesting
tentative subdivision map for
the Toll Brothers at Folsom
Ranch Phase 2B subdivision
was approved by the City
Council on January 11, 2022.

Yes

4. FMC Compliance
The Small-Lot Final Map shall comply with the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act.

M

CD (E)
The small-lot vesting
tentative subdivision map for
the Toll Brothers at Folsom
Ranch Phase 2B subdivision
was approved by the City
Council on January 11, 2022.

Yes

5. Development Rights
The approval of this Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map conveys the right to develop. As noted in these conditions of approval for the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, the City has identified improvements necessary to develop the subject parcels. These improvements include on and off-site roadways, water, sewer, storm drainage, landscaping, sound-walls, and other improvements.

OG

CD (P)(E)(B)

PW, PR, FD,
PD

The Community
Development Department has
reviewed and approved the
improvement plans for the
both the required on-site and
off-site improvements for the
Phase 2B subdivision.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 20-267)

NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST BIDWELL STREET AND WHITE ROCK ROAD

SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
No. Mitigation
Measure Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department Comments Condition
Satisfied

6. Public Utility Easements
Public utility easements shall be provided for public utilities within private streets to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

M

CD (E)(P)
The final map for the Phase
2B subdivision includes all
required public utility
easements necessary to serve
all lots in the subdivision.

The public utility easements
are shown on the final map.

The residential streets serving
the lots in this subdivision are
private and are shown on the
final map.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 20-267)

NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST BIDWELL STREET AND WHITE ROCK ROAD

SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
No. Mitigation
Measure Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department Comments Condition
Satisfied

7. Indemnity for City
The owner/applicant shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, employees, or legislative body concerning the project, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable statutes of limitation. The City will promptly notify the owner/applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the owner owner/applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees, pursuant to this condition. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur:

• The City bears its own attorney’s fees and costs; and • The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith

The owner/applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the owner/applicant. The owner/applicant’s obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to this project.

OG

CD (P)(E)(B)

PW, PR, FD,
PD

The City standard subdivision
improvement agreement
includes language that
satisfies this condition. The
subdivision improvement
agreement will be executed
by the City Manager upon
approval by the City Council.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 20-267)

NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST BIDWELL STREET AND WHITE ROCK ROAD

SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
No. Mitigation
Measure Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department Comments Condition
Satisfied

8. Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
The Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision map is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all environmental mitigation measures identified in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FEIR/EIS) as amended by the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch CEQA Addendum dated February-2020.

OG

CD
The owner/applicant
complied with all applicable
mitigation measures from the
FPASP FEIR/EIS and other
approved environmental
documents prior to the
issuance of a grading permit.

Additionally, construction
inspection and monitoring is
being conducted throughout
construction by the City
and/or its Consultants.

Yes

9. ARDA and Amendments
The owner/applicant shall comply with all provisions of Amendments No. 1 and 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement and any approved amendments
thereafter by and between the City and the owner/applicant of the project including but not limited to Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Easton Valley Holdings, LLC, Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and West Scott Road, LLC/Toll West Coast, LLC, Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Oak Avenue Holdings, LLC, and Amendment No. 3 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Folsom Real Estate South, LLC/Toll West Coast, LLC.

M

CD (E)
The Community
Development Department has
reviewed the subdivision and
verified that it is in
compliance with Amendment
No. 1 and No. 2 to the First
Amended and Restated Tier 1
Development Agreement.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 20-267)

NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST BIDWELL STREET AND WHITE ROCK ROAD

SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
No. Mitigation
Measure Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department Comments Condition
Satisfied

10. 

Mitigation Monitoring
The owner/applicant shall participate in a mitigation monitoring and reporting program pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2634 and Public Resources Code 21081.6. The mitigation monitoring and reporting measures identified in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan FEIR/EIS and the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS have been incorporated into these conditions of approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. These mitigation monitoring and reporting measures are identified in the mitigation measure column. Applicant shall fund on a Time and Materials basis all mitigation monitoring (e.g., staff and consultant time).

OG CD (P)
The owner/applicant has
funded and participated in a
MMRP reporting program
performed by the City’s
consultant (Helix) and/or City
staff.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

POLICE/SECURITY REQUIREMENT

11. The owner/applicant shall consult with the Police Department in order to incorporate all reasonable crime prevention measures. The following security/safety measures shall be considered:

• A security guard on-duty at all times at the site or a six-foot security fence shall be constructed around the perimeter of construction areas.

• Security measures for the safety of all construction equipment and unit appliances.

• Landscaping shall not cover exterior doors or windows, block line-of-sight at intersections or screen overhead lighting.

G, I, B

PD
The owner/applicant
provided onsite security
during construction and has
incorporated line of sight
guidelines into landscaping
plans at intersections which
have been reviewed and
approved by the City.

Yes

DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND FEE REQUIREMENTS

12. Taxes and Fees
The owner/applicant shall pay all applicable taxes, fees and charges for the project at the rate and amount required by the Public Facilities Financing Plan and Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement.

M

CD (P)(E)

The owner/applicant has paid
all current taxes and fees
associated with this
subdivision.

Yes

13. Assessments
If applicable, the owner/applicant shall pay off any existing assessments against the property, or file necessary segregation request and pay applicable fees.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has paid
all taxes and fees associated
with this subdivision and
filed a tax segregation request
for applicable taxes.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

14. FPASP Development Impact Fees
The owner/applicant shall be subject to all Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Area development impact fees in place at the time of approval or subsequently adopted consistent with the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), Development Agreement and amendments thereto, unless exempt by previous agreement. The owner/applicant shall be subject to all applicable Folsom Plan Area plan-wide development impact fees in effect at such time that a building permit is issued. These fees may include, but are not limited to, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Fee, Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF), Solid Waste Fee, Corporation Yard Fee, Transportation Management Fee, Transit Fee, Highway 50
Interchange Fee, General Park Equipment Fee, Housing Trust Fee, etc.

Any protest to such for all fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this project will begin on the date of final approval (January 11, 2022), or otherwise shall be governed by the terms of Amendments No. 1 and 2 to ARDA. The fees shall be calculated at the fee rate set forth in the PFFP and the ARDA.

B

CD (P), PW,
PK
The Owner/Applicant shall
pay all required City fees and
Folsom Plan Area wide fees
prior to issuance of building
permits.

Yes

15. Legal Counsel
The City, at its sole discretion, may utilize the services of outside legal counsel to assist in the implementation of this project, including, but not limited to, drafting, reviewing and/or revising agreements and/or other documentation for the project. If the City utilizes the services of such outside legal counsel, the City shall provide notice to the owner/applicant of the outside counsel selected, the scope of work and hourly rates, and the
owner/applicant shall reimburse the City for all outside legal fees and costs incurred and documented by the City for such services.

The owner/applicant may be required, at the sole discretion of the City Attorney, to submit a deposit to the City for these services prior to initiation of the services. The owner/applicant shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for the services regardless of whether a deposit is required.

OG

CD (P)(E)
The City has not yet utilized
any outside services for any
type of legal issues for this
subdivision. If at any time
during the development of
this subdivision, any outside
legal services were necessary,
the owner/applicant would be
required to comply with this
condition.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

16. Consultant Services
If the City utilizes the services of consultants to prepare special studies or provide specialized design review or inspection services for the project, the City shall provide notice to the owner/applicant of the outside consultant selected, the scope of work and hourly rates, and the owner/applicant shall reimburse the City for actual costs incurred and documented in utilizing these services, including administrative costs for City personnel. A deposit for these services shall be provided prior to initiating review of the Grading Plan, Final Map, improvement plans, or beginning inspection, whichever is applicable.

G, I, M, B

CD (P)(E)

The City has provided notice
to the owner/applicant for
various Consultants
performing services for the
development of this
subdivision. The City has
collected deposits in advance
of such work for construction
inspection related services for
this subdivision.

Yes

GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

17. Walls/Fences/Gates
The final location, design, height, materials, and colors of the walls, fences, and gates shall consistent with the submitted Wall and Fence Exhibit and Details, dated April 28, 2021 subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department to ensure consistency with the Folsom Ranch Central District Design Guidelines.

G, I, B CD (P)(E)
The Community
Development Department has
verified that the proposed
walls and fences for the
subdivision are in compliance
with the Folsom Ranch
Central Design Guidelines.

Yes

18. The owner/applicant shall construct, and phase improvements as referenced in the traffic impact report prepared by T. Kear dated November 20, 2019 to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Department. The owner/applicant shall implement the following traffic conditions (Conditions of Approval Nos. 19- 25) prior to issuance of the 546th Regency Active Adult Community building permit (excluding the 47 model home
building permits).

I, B,O CD (E), PW,
FD
The owner/applicant is
currently constructing the on-
site and off-site public and
private improvements for the
Phase 2B subdivision. The
improvements will serve all
of the lots in the subdivision.

Yes

19. Regency Parkway (Segment 3)
Construct Regency Parkway as a two-lane roadway from the eastern edge of the planned bridge over the creek bisecting the project site to Mangini Parkway.

B CD (E), PW,
FD
The City has approved the
plans for these required
improvements and they are
currently under construction.

The Community
Development Department
will verify completion prior
to issuance of a building
permit in this subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

20. Mangini Parkway/Regency Parkway (Driveway 3)
Construct driveway as shown in (Figure 47 of the November 20, 2019 Transportation Impact Study):
• Northbound: one shared lane;
• Westbound: one through lane and one left turn lane in a 60’ pocket with 60’taper;
• Eastbound: one through lane and one right turn lane in a 150’ pocket with 60’taper;
• Control: side-street-stop-control.

B CD (E), PW,
FD
The City has approved the
plans for these required
improvements and they are
currently under construction.

The Community
Development Department
will verify completion prior
to issuance of a building
permit in this subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

21. East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway 6)
Modify driveway as shown in (Figure 51 of the November 20, 2019, Transportation Impact Study), unless intersection has been signalized:
• Northbound: one through lane and one left turn lane in a 150’ pocket with 60’ taper;
• Southbound: one through lane and one right turn lane in a 150’ pocket with 60’taper;
• Eastbound: one shared lane, plus a 300’ northbound
acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-turns from Regency Parkway (a second NB lane on East Bidwell
Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300’ acceleration lane);
• Westbound departure: two lanes separated by a median for two access gates shall be subject to City Engineers prior approval. • Control: side-street-stop-control.

B CD (E), PW,
FD
The City has approved the
plans for these required
improvements and they are
currently under construction.

The Community
Development Department
will verify completion prior
to issuance of a building
permit in this subdivision.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

22. Regency Phase 2 Internal Stop Control
Stop Control shall be installed at any internal Regency Phase 2 intersections with four (or more) legs as directed by the City Engineer. Roundabouts may replace stop control at internal intersections with authorization from the City Engineer. B CD (E), PW, FD
The City Engineer has
approved the improvement
plans for this subdivision and
they include the required stop
signs.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

23. East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway
Expand the intersection and update signal configuration as follows (Figure 57 of the November 20, 2019 Transportation Impact Study):
• NB: One left-turn lane in a 200’ pocket with 60’ taper, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane in a 150’ pocket with a 60’ taper (the second through lane should be developed 300’ south of the intersection);
• SB: One left-turn lane in a 200’ pocket with 60’ taper, one through lane, and one right-turn lane in a 150’pocket with 60’taper;
• EB and WB: One left-turn lane in a 200’ pocket with 60’ taper, one through lane, and one right-turn lane in a 200’pocket with 60’taper.

B CD (E), PW,
FD
The owner/applicant has
constructed these required
improvements at the
intersection and the City
Engineer has formally
accepted the required
improvements.

Yes

24. East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway
Reconstruct and modify signal at the East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway intersection as shown in Figure 59 of the November 20, 2019, Transportation Impact Study:
• NB Approach: One U-turn lane in a 150’ pocket with a 60’ taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150’ pocket plus 60’ taper.
• SB Approach: One left turn lane in a 240’ pocket plus 60’ taper, and two through lanes. The second SB through lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way, the estimated taper for merging the two southbound lanes into one should be 660 feet long based on a 55 mph design speed and 12-foot lane width. • WB Approach: One right turn lane, plus one left-turn lane in a 200’ pocket plus 60’ taper.

B CD (E), PW,
FD
The City has approved the
plans for these required
improvements and they are
currently under construction.

The Community
Development Department
will verify completion prior
to issuance of a building
permit in this subdivision.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

25. East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway
Reconstruct the East Bidwell Street/Savannah Pkwy intersection with the following geometry (Figure 61 of the November 20, 2019, Transportation Impact Study):
• NB Approach: One through lane and one shared through-right lane with a 150’ taper;
• SB Approach: One left turn lane in a 150’ pocket plus 60’ taper, and one through lane;
• WB Approach: One left turn lane in a 60’ pocket plus 60’ taper, and one through lane;
• SB departure: Construct a southbound receiving and
acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The
acceleration lane shall be in a 300’ pocket plus an appropriate taper.

B CD (E), PW,
FD
The City has approved the
plans for these required
improvements and they are
currently under construction.

The Community
Development Department
will verify completion prior
to issuance of a building
permit in this subdivision.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

26. Utility Infrastructure
• Utilities shall be constructed concurrent with the roadway phasing, as deemed appropriate and necessary to support the particular phase by the City Engineer.

• A particular development phase may be developed into sub- phases in which the roadway and utility phasing may
change. If sub-phasing is proposed, the City Engineer shall determine what roadway and utility improvements are
appropriate and necessary to serve the sub-phase.

G, I, M CD (E), PW,
FD
The Community
Development Department has
reviewed and approved the
phasing plan for Phase 2 of
the Toll Brothers at Folsom
Ranch Regency project. The
City Engineer has approved
the phasing plan to verify that
the proposed roadway and
infrastructure is appropriate
for each phase.

Yes

27. Off-site improvements / Rights of Entry
For any improvements constructed on private property that are not under the ownership or control of the owner/applicant, all rights-of- entry, and if necessary, a permanent easement shall be obtained and provided to the City. All rights of entry, construction easements, either permanent or temporary and other easements shall be obtained as set forth in Amendments No. 1 and 2 to ARDA, which shall be fully executed by all affected parties and shall be recorded with the Sacramento County Recorder, where applicable, prior to approval of grading and/or improvement plans.

G, I

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
provided copies of fully
executed rights-of-entry from
privately owned parcels that
adjoin the Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch project. The
fully executed rights-of-entry
are on file with the
Community Development
Department.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

28. Mine Shaft Remediation
The owner/applicant shall locate and remediate all antiquated mine shafts, drifts, open cuts, tunnels, and water conveyance or impoundment structures existing on the project site, with specific recommendations for the sealing, filling, or removal of each that meet all applicable health, safety and engineering standards.

Recommendations shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed engineer or geologist. All remedial plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of grading plans.

G

CD (E)
During the course of grading
and construction for the
subdivision no mine shafts or
tunnels were located or
discovered.

Yes

29. Prepare Traffic Control Plan.

Prior to construction, a Traffic Control Plan for roadways and intersections affected by construction shall be prepared by the owner/applicant. The Traffic Control Plan prepared by the owner/applicant shall, at minimum, include the following measures:

• Maintaining the maximum amount of travel lane capacity during non-construction periods, possible, and advanced notice to drivers through the provision of construction signage. • Maintaining alternate one-way traffic flow past the lay down area and site access when feasible.
• Heavy trucks and other construction transport vehicles shall avoid the busiest commute hours (7 a.m. to 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays).
• A minimum 72-hour advance notice of access restrictions for residents, businesses, and local emergency response agencies.

This shall include the identification of alternative routes and detours to enable for the avoidance of the immediate
construction zone.
• A phone number and City contact for inquiries about the schedule of the construction throughout the construction period. This information will be posted in a local newspaper, via the City’s web site, or at City Hall and will be updated on a monthly basis.

G

CD (E)
The Community
Development Department has
reviewed and approved and
will review and approve all
proposed traffic control plans
necessary to construct the
required subdivision
improvements. Grading and
construction of the
subdivision improvements
commenced in August of
2022 and will continue
through to the first quarter of
2024.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

30. State and Federal Permits
The owner/applicant shall obtain all required State and Federal permits and provide evidence that said permits have been obtained, or that the permit is not required, subject to staff review prior to approval of any grading or improvement plan.

G, I

CD (P)(E)
The owner/applicant has
obtained all required State
and Federal permits and
copies are available from the
Community Development
Department.

Yes

31. Water Quality Certification
A water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act is required before issuance of the record of decision and before issuance of the Section 404 permit. Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the owner/applicant shall obtain water quality certification for the project. Any measures required as part of the issuance of water quality certification shall be implemented pursuant to the permit conditions.

G

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
obtained all required State
and Federal permits including
Section 401 water quality
certification and copies are
available from the
Community Development
Department.

Yes

32. Landslide /Slope Failure
The owner/applicant shall retain an appropriately licensed engineer during the grading activities to identify existing landslides and potential slope failure hazards. The said engineer shall be notified a minimum of two days prior to any site clearing or grading to facilitate meetings with the grading contractor in the field.

G

CD (E) PW
The owner/applicant retained
a geotechnical engineer and
implemented
recommendations for this
mitigation measure. A
geotechnical report outlining
these recommendations is
available from Community
Development Department.

Yes

IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

33. Improvement Plans
The improvement plans for the required public and private subdivision improvements necessary to serve any and all phases of development shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to approval of a Final Map.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant
submitted improvement plans
for all infrastructure
improvements required to
serve this subdivision. The
City Engineer has reviewed
and approved all required
improvement plans to serve
this subdivision. Copies of
the improvement plans are
available from the
Community Development
Department.

Yes

34. Standard Construction Specifications and Details
Public and private improvements, including roadways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle lanes and trails, streetlights, underground infrastructure and all other improvements shall be provided in accordance with the latest edition of the City of Folsom Standard Construction Specifications and Details and the Design and Procedures Manual and Improvement Standards.

I

CD (P)(E)
The owner/applicant
submitted improvement plans
in accordance with the City’s
Standard Specifications.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

35. Water and Sewer Infrastructure
All City-owned water and sewer infrastructure shall be placed within the street right of way. In the event that a City-maintained public water or sewer main needs to be placed in an area other than the public right of way, such as through an open space corridor, landscaped area, etc., the following criteria must be met;

• The owner/applicant shall provide public sewer and water main easements
• An access road shall be designed and constructed to allow for the operations, maintenance and replacement of the public water or sewer line by the City along the entire water and/or sewer line alignment. However, no access road is required within the two pedestrian paseos (Lot BI and BJ) as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map)
• In no case shall a City-maintained public water or public sewer line be placed on private residential property.
• The domestic water and irrigation system owned and
maintained by the City shall be separately metered per City of Folsom Standard Construction Specifications and Details.

I

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
installed all City owned
sewer and water
infrastructure within the
private streets in the
subdivision. The outfall
trunk sewer line has been
installed within easements or
planned right of way within
future public streets.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

36. Lighting Plan
The owner/applicant of all project phases shall submit a lighting plan for the project to the Community Development Department.

The lighting plan shall be consistent with the Folsom Ranch Central District Design Guidelines:
• Shield or screen lighting fixtures to direct the light downward and prevent light spill on adjacent properties;
• Place and shield or screen flood and area lighting needed for construction activities, nighttime sporting activities, and/or security so as not to disturb adjacent residential areas and passing motorists;
• For public lighting in residential neighborhoods, prohibit the use of light fixtures that are of unusually high intensity or that blink or flash;
• Use appropriate building materials (such as low-glare glass, low-glare building glaze or finish, neutral, earth toned colored paint and roofing materials), shielded or screened lighting, and appropriate signage in the office/commercial areas to prevent light and glare from adversely affecting motorists on nearby roadways; and
• Design exterior on-site lighting as an integral part of the building and landscaping design in the Specific Plan Area.

Lighting fixtures shall be architecturally consistent with the overall site design. Lights used on signage should be directed to light only the sign face with no off-site glare.

I

CD (P)
The owner/applicant
submitted a Lighting Plan for
all roadways and this
subdivision in accordance
with the Design Guidelines
and City Standards for Street
Lighting. A copy of the
lighting plans are available
from the Community
Development Department.

Yes

37. Utility Coordination
The owner/applicant shall coordinate the planning, development and completion of this project with the various utility agencies (i.e., SMUD, PG&E, etc.). The owner/applicant shall provide the City with written confirmation of public utility service prior to approval of all final maps.

M

CD (P)(E)
The owner/applicant has
coordinated with all various
utility agencies. All required
utility easements are shown
on the final map for this
subdivision.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

38. Replacing Hazardous Facilities
The owner/applicant shall be responsible for replacing any and all damaged or hazardous public sidewalk, curb and gutter, and/or bicycle trail facilities along the site frontage and/or boundaries, including pre-existing conditions and construction damage, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

I, OG

CD (E)
There is a general note on the
approved improvements
plans requiring compliance
with this condition.

Yes

39. Future Utility Lines
All future utility lines lower than 69 KV that are to be built within the project shall be placed underground within and along the perimeter of the project at the developer’s cost. The
owner/applicant shall dedicate to SMUD all necessary underground easements for the electrical facilities that will be necessary to service development of the project.

M

CD (E)
All proposed utility service to
the lots in this subdivision
have been placed
underground
Yes

40. Water Meter Fixed Network System
The owner owner/applicant shall pay for, furnish and install all infrastructure associated with the water meter fixed network system for any City-owned and maintained water meter within the project.

I

CD (E),
EWR
The Owner/applicant has
completed the infrastructure
allowing for the water meter
fixed network system.

Meters will be furnished and
installed during home
construction for each
individual metered
connection.

Yes

41. Vertical Curb
All curbs located adjacent to landscaping, whether natural or manicured, and where parking is allowed shall be vertical.

I

CD (P)(B)
The approved improvement
plans for this subdivision
include vertical concrete curb
in compliance with this
condition.

Yes

42. Class II Bike Lanes
All Class II bike lanes shall be striped, and the legends painted to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. No parking shall be permitted within the Class II bike lanes.

I

CD (E)(P)
All Class II bike lanes have
been constructed in
accordance with the Specific
Plan, Design Guidelines and
City standards.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

43. 

Noise Barriers
Based on the Environmental Noise Assessment (the “2019 Noise Assessment”) prepared by Bollard Acoustical Consultants on November 24, 2019, the following measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department:
• 6-foot-tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all residential property boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway prior to occupancy of any residences adjacent to the aforementioned streets.
• For the proposed Regency Phase 1 and Phase 2 portions of the project (which are located at the northwest corner of the intersection of White Rock Road and East Bidwell Street and north of White Rock Road in the central portion of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project site), an 8-foot-tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all residential property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.
• Suitable materials for the traffic noise barriers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall barrier height may be achieved by utilizing a barrier and earthen berm combination.

Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an aco
ustical consultant and approved by the Community
Development Department prior to use.
• Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

I, O

CD (E)(P)
The approved landscape
plans for East Bidwell Street,
Mangini Parkway and White
Rock Road include the
required sound walls with the
required heights.along all of
these public streets in
accordance with the
recommendations of the
noted acoustical study.

The Community
Development Department
will review and approve all
site plans for each and every
lot in the subdivision to
verify compliance with this
condition.

Yes

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

44. Master Plan Updates
The City has approved the Folsom Plan Area Storm Drainage Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, and Water Master Plan. The owner/applicant shall submit complete updates to the approved master plans, if applicable, for the proposed changes to the master plans as a result of the proposed project. The updates to the master plans for the proposed project shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of grading and/or improvement plans.

The plans shall be accompanied by engineering studies supporting the sizing, location, and timing of the proposed facilities.

Improvements shall be constructed in phases as the project develops in accordance with the approved master plans, including any necessary off-site improvements to support development of a particular phase or phases, subject to prior approval by the City.

Off-site improvements may include roadways to provide secondary access, water transmission lines or distribution facilities to provide a looped water system, sewer trunk mains and lift stations, water quality facilities, non-potable water pipelines and infrastructure, and drainage facilities including on or off-site detention. No changes in infrastructure from that shown on the approved master plan shall be permitted unless and until the applicable master plan has been revised and approved by the City. Final lot configurations may need to be modified to accommodate the improvements identified in these studies to the satisfaction of the City.

The owner/applicant shall provide sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage improvements with corresponding easements, as
necessary, in accordance with these studies and the latest edition of the City of Folsom Standard Construction Specifications and Details, and the Design and Procedures Manual and Improvement Standards.

The storm drainage design shall provide for no net increase in run- off under post-development conditions.

G, I

CD(E),

EWR, PW
The Owner/applicant has
provided updated Master
Plans for approval prior to the
issuance of a grading permit.

Copies of the Master Plans
are available from the
Community Development
Department. The storm
drainage system for the
subdivision provides for no
net increase in run-off under
post development conditions.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

45. Best Management Practices
The storm drain improvement plans shall provide for “Best Management Practices” that meet the requirements of the water quality standards of the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board.

In addition to compliance with City ordinances, the
owner/applicant shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) that comply with the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Central Valley RWQCB, to reduce water quality effects during construction. Detailed information about the SWPPP and BMPs are provided in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality.” Each proposed project development shall result in no net change to peak flows into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, or to Buffalo Creek, Carson Creek, and Coyote Creek. The
owner/applicant shall establish a baseline of conditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow conditions shall be established for 2-, 5-, and 100-year storm events. These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the stormwater system on the Specific Plan Area. The baseline conditions, monitoring standards, and a monitoring program shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. Water quality and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance standards, which are described in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality,” are met and shall be designed as off-stream detention basins.

Discharge sites into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, as well as tributaries to Carson Creek, Coyote Creek, and Buffalo Creek, shall be monitored to ensure that pre-project conditions are being met. Corrective measures shall be implemented as necessary. The mitigation measures will be satisfied when the monitoring standards are met for 5 consecutive years without undertaking corrective measures to meet the performance standard.

G, I

CD (E)
The Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES permit
from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES
Permit requires the
implementation of BMP’s,
monitoring and reporting for
stormwater runoff. The
NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP),
which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to
the City and SRWQCB.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

46. Litter Control
During Construction, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for litter control and sweeping of all paved surfaces in accordance with City standards. All on-site storm drains shall be cleaned immediately before the commencement of the rainy season (October 15).

OG

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
complied with this provision
and completed periodic on-
site cleaning and sweeping of
the project site.

Yes

FIRE DEPT REQUIREMENTS

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

47. Prepare fuel modification plan (FMP)
The owner/applicant shall submit a Fuel Modification Plan consistent with the FPA Open Space Management Plan to the City for review and approval by the City. Final approval of the plan shall occur prior to the issuance of a building permit for any new construction. A Fuel Modification Plan shall consist of a set of scaled plans showing fuel modification zones indicated with applicable assessment notes, a detailed landscape plan and an irrigation plan. A fuel modification plan submitted for approval shall be prepared by one of the following: a California state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed landscape contractor, or a landscape designed, or an individual with expertise acceptable to the Fire Code Official.

Notification of fuel modification requirements are to be made upon sale to new property owners. Proposed changes to the approved Fuel Modification Plan shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation.

The owner/applicant shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide fuel
modification easement(s) for all residential properties located adjacent to open space areas within the development. The owner/applicant shall dedicate easements, if applicable, for the required fuel modification buffer. The fuel modification easement(s) shall be shown on the Final Map. The owner/applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance of the fuel modification areas until such time that the City takes ownership of the open space areas that are to be deeded to the City within the project site.

M, B

CD (P), FD
The Community
Development Department,
the Fire Department and the
Parks & Recreation
Department have reviewed
and approved the Fuel
Modification Plan (FMP) for
the subdivision. The fuel
modification easement, where
applicable, is shown on the
final map for this subdivision.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

48. All-Weather Access and Fire Hydrants
The owner/applicant shall provide all-weather access and fire hydrants before combustible materials are allowed on any project site or other approved alternative method as approved by the Fire Department. All-weather emergency access roads and fire hydrants (tested and flushed) shall be provided before combustible material or vertical construction is allowed on any project site or other approved alternative method as approved by the Fire Department. (All-weather access is defined as six inches of compacted aggregate base from May 1 to September 30 and two inches asphalt concrete over six inches aggregate base from October to April 30).

The building shall have illuminated addresses visible from the street or drive fronting the property. Size and location of address identification shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department.
• Residential Fire -Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinkler System:

The required fire-flow for the proposed residential portion of the project is determined to be 875 GPM for one hour.
• All public streets shall meet City of Folsom Street Standards. • The maximum length of any dead- end street shall not exceed 500 feet in accordance with the Folsom Fire Code (unless approved by the Fire Department).
• All-weather emergency access roads and fire hydrants (tested and flushed) shall be provided before combustible material storage or vertical construction is allowed. All-weather access is defined as 6” of compacted AB from May 1 to September 30 and 2”AC over 6” AB from October 1 to April 30
• The first Fire Station planned for the Folsom Plan Area may be required to be completed and operational at the time that the threshold of 1,500 occupied homes within the Folsom Plan Area is met.

G, I, M, B

CD (P), FD
The owner/applicant has
designed and received
approval for all weather
access improvements and fire
hydrants for this subdivision.

Permits for vertical
construction will not be
issued prior to these
improvements being
completed. As of September
1, 2023, the City has issued
approximately 2600
Certificates of Occupancy in
the Folsom Plan Area.

LANDSCAPE/TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

49. The owner/applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit, mitigate for removal of protected and heritage trees consistent with the Preliminary Tree Preservation/Removal Exhibit, dated October 13, 2021 and in accordance with Chapter 12.16 of the City of Folsom Municipal Code for Tree Preservation, and minimize indirect impacts to trees to be preserved. This shall include the following:

• A Tree Permit Application containing an application form, justification statement, site map, preservation program, and arborist’s report shall be submitted to the City of Folsom by the owner/applicant for issuance of a Tree Permit prior to
commencement of any grading or site improvement activities.

• A Mitigation Plan shall be prepared by the owner/applicant to mitigate for the removal of the protected Canopy Oak Trees and Isolated Oak Trees within the development site. The Mitigation Plan for the Isolated Oak Trees shall consist of replacement trees and/or payment of “In-Lieu” fees on a diameter inch bases consistent with 10-14, 10-15 of the FPASP. Replacement trees may be located within the
boundaries of the development parcel, a natural parkway, landscape corridor or passive or preserve open space zone, preferably within the Folsom Plan Area. The Mitigation Plan for the Isolated Oak Trees shall be subject to review and approval by the City. The Mitigation Plan for the Canopy Oak Trees shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements established by the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.

• The Conservation Areas shall be fenced prior to construction.

In addition, oak trees to be preserved within the Passive Recreation Open Spaces shall be fenced with high-visibility fencing prior to starting construction. The fencing shall be installed outside the tree preservation zone of oak trees, and shall surround the entirety of the tree preservation zone area.

Parking of vehicles, equipment, or storage of materials is prohibited within the Tree Protection Zone of Protected Trees at all times. Signs shall be posted on exclusion fencing stating

G, I

CD (P)(E)
The owner/applicant obtained
a Tree Permit from the
Community Development
Department for the removal
of protected oak trees that
were impacted by the grading
and construction of Phase 1
of the Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch project.

The Tree Permit was
approved prior to
commencement of grading
and construction in the
Summer of 2022. The
owner/applicant paid in-lieu
fees for the removal of some
trees, the City approved a
Tree Replacement Plan for
another portion of the tree
that were removed and
preserved existing oak trees
in El Dorado County for the
remaining mitigation for the
total number of protected
trees in accordance with this
condition.

The Conservation Easements
within the Phase 2 portion of
the subdivision were fenced
off around their boundaries in
advance of the
commencement of grading
and construction and the City
verified compliance by
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

that the enclosed trees are to be preserved. Signs shall state the penalty for damage to, or removal of, the protected tree.

inspecting the fence in
advance of grading.

50. • The owner/applicant shall retain an ISA certified project arborist for implementation of the project. The project arborist shall be responsible for overseeing onsite tree removal and tree preservation. Oak trees located adjacent to construction areas that may be indirectly impacted due to work within or near the Tree Protection Zone shall be identified and tagged by the project arborist during construction activities. The indirectly impacted trees shall be monitored by the project arborist for five years in accordance with the Conceptual Oak Plan and FPASP EIR/EIS Mitigation Measure 3A.3-5. Trees that appear to be dead or dying within five years of project implementation will be replaced as per the requirements of this Plan.

G

CD (P)(E)
The owner/applicant has
retained an ISA certified
project arborist. The project
arborist was on-site during
the removal of all protected
oak trees and was present
during grading within the tree
protection zone (TPZ) of
those tree that were to be
preserved. All of the
preserved trees were
identified, tagged and TPZ
fencing was placed around
them prior to commencement
of grading in August of 2022.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

51. Landscaping Plans
Final landscape plans and specifications shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and approved by the City prior to the approval of the first building permit. Said plans shall include all on-site landscape specifications and details including a tree planting exhibit demonstrating sufficient diversity and appropriate species selection to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Department. The tree exhibit shall include all street trees, accent trees, parking lot shading trees, and mitigation trees proposed within the development. Said plans shall comply with all State and local rules, regulations, Governor’s declarations and restrictions pertaining to water conservation and outdoor landscaping.

Landscaping shall meet shade requirements as outlined in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan where applicable. The landscape plans shall comply and implement water efficient requirements as adopted by the State of California (Assembly Bill 1881) (State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance) until such time the City of Folsom adopts its own Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance at which time the owner/applicant shall comply with any new ordinance. Shade and ornamental trees shall be maintained according to the most current American National Standards for Tree Care Operations (ANSI A-300) by qualified tree care professionals.

Tree topping for height reduction, view protection, light clearance or any other purpose shall not be allowed. Specialty-style pruning, such as pollarding, shall be specified within the approved landscape plans and shall be implemented during a 5-year establishment and training period. The owner/applicant shall comply with city-wide landscape rules or regulations on water usage. Owner/ applicant shall comply with any state or local rules and regulations relating to landscape water usage and landscaping requirements necessitated to mitigate for drought conditions on all landscaping in the Toll Brothers project.

B

CD (P)(E)
The Community
Development Department is
currently reviewing the
landscape and streetscape
plans for this subdivision.

Prior to plan approval, the
Community Development
Department will review the
plans for compliance with
this condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

52. Right of Way Landscaping
Landscaping along all road rights of way and in public open space lots shall be installed when the adjoining road or lots are constructed.

I, OG

CD (P)
The landscape and irrigation
improvements for all open
space parcels in the
subdivision will be
constructed upon completion
of the roads and lots that
adjoin them.

Yes

MAP REQUIREMENTS

53. Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Prior to the approval of any Final Map, the owner/applicant shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with the City, identifying all required improvements, if any, to be constructed with each proposed phase of development. The owner/applicant shall provide security acceptable to the City, guaranteeing construction of the improvements.

M

CD (E)
The required subdivision
improvement agreement is
included as part of the City
staff report accompanying the
final map for City Council
approval. The resolution
approving the final map for
this subdivision includes a
statement authorizing the City
Manager to execute the
subdivision improvement
agreement for the subdivision
along with approval of the
final map.

Yes

54. The Final Inclusionary Housing Plan
The Final Inclusionary Housing Plan shall be approved by the City Council, and the Inclusionary Housing Agreement approved by the City Attorney shall be executed prior to recordation of the first Small-Lot Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project.

M

CD (P)(E)
The owner/applicant has
executed an Inclusionary
Housing Agreement with the
City. The agreement allows
the owner/applicant to
provide an in-lieu fee
assigned to each building
permit in the subdivision. The
in-lieu housing fee will be
paid at the time of building
permit issuance.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

55. Department of Real Estate Public Report
The owner/applicant shall disclose to the homebuyers in the Department of Real Estate Public Report and the CC&R’s for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project the following items:

1) Future public parks and public schools are located in relatively close proximity to the proposed subdivision, and that the public parks may include facilities (basketball courts, a baseball field, softball fields, soccer fields, and playground equipment) that may generate noise impacts
during various times, including but not limited to evening and nighttime hours. The owner/applicant shall also
disclose that the existing public parks include nighttime sports lighting that may generate lighting impacts during evening and nighttime hours.

2) The soil in the subdivision may contain naturally occurring asbestos and naturally occurring arsenic.

3) The collecting, digging, or removal of any stone, artifact, or other prehistoric or historic object located in public or open space areas, and the disturbance of any archaeological site or historic property, is prohibited.

4) The project site is located within close proximity to the Mather Airport flight path and that overflight noise may be present at various times.

5) That all properties located within one mile of an on- or off- site area zoned or used for agricultural use (including livestock grazing) shall be accompanied by written
disclosure from the transferor, in a form approved by the City of Folsom, advising any transferee of the potential adverse odor impacts from surrounding agricultural
operations which disclosure shall direct the transferee to contact the County of Sacramento concerning any such

M

CD (P) PK
The Community
Development Department has
reviewed the subdivisions CC
& R’s and verified that all
required disclosures in this
condition of approval are
included.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

property within the County zoned for agricultural uses
within one mile of the subject property being transferred.

6) The project site is located adjacent to the future JPA Connector which may generate noise impacts during
various times including but not limited to evening and
nighttime hours.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

56. Public Utility Easements
The owner/applicant shall dedicate public utility easements for underground facilities on properties adjacent to the public and private streets. A minimum of twelve and one-half-foot (12.5’) wide Public Utility Easements for underground facilities (i.e., SMUD, Pacific Gas and Electric, cable television, telephone) shall be dedicated adjacent to all public and private street rights-of-way.

The owner/applicant shall dedicate additional width to
accommodate extraordinary facilities as determined by the City.

The width of the public utility easements adjacent to public and private right of way may be reduced with prior approval from public utility companies.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
dedicated a 12.5’ PUE along
all roadway utility corridors as
well as internal streets within
the subdivision. The public
utility easements are shown on
the final map.

Yes

57. Final Map Phasing
Should multiple Final Maps be filed by the owner/applicant, the phasing of maps shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

M

CD (E)
The Community
Development Department has
reviewed and approved the
phasing plan for Phase 2B of
the Toll Brothers project.

Yes

58. Backbone Infrastructure
As provided for in the ARDA and the Amendment No. 1 thereto, the owner/applicant shall provide fully executed grant deeds, legal descriptions, and plats for all necessary Infrastructure to serve the project, including but not limited to lands, public rights of way, public utility easements, public water main easements, public sewer easements, irrevocable offers of dedication and temporary construction easements. All required easements as listed necessary for the Infrastructure shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded with the Sacramento County Recorder pursuant to the timing requirements set forth in Section 3.8 of the ARDA, and any amendments thereto.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant provided
all necessary public utility
easements, grant deeds, offers
of dedication or temporary
construction easements
required to build all of the
required Backbone
Infrastructure needed to serve
the subdivision. These were
recorded with Sacramento
County Recorder by separate
instrument.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

59. New Permanent Benchmarks
The owner/applicant shall provide and establish new permanent benchmarks on the (NAVD 88) datum in various locations within the subdivision or at any other locations in the vicinity of the project/subdivision as directed by the City Engineer. The type and specifications for the permanent benchmarks shall be provided by the City. The new benchmarks shall be placed by the
owner/applicant within 6 months from the date of approval of the vesting tentative subdivision map.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
installed new benchmarks per
the direction of the City
Engineer and the new
benchmarks have been placed
in compliance with this
condition of approval.

Yes

60. Centralized Mail Delivery Units
All Final Maps shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. The owner/applicant shall provide a concrete base for the placement of any centralized mail delivery unit. Specifications and location of such base shall be determined pursuant to the applicable requirements of the U. S. Postal Service and the City of Folsom Community Development Department, with due consideration for street light location, traffic safety, security, and consumer convenience.

M

CD (E)
The final map for this
subdivision includes the
required easement for the
placement of centralized mail
delivery units. The USPS will
provide the owner/applicant
with the location of the mail
delivery unit and will provide
a concrete pad for the
placement is the specified
location in the subdivision.

Yes

61. Recorded Final Map
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the owner/applicant shall provide a digital copy of the recorded Final Map (in AutoCAD format) to the Community Development Department. The
exception to this requirement are model homes; subject to approval of the Community Development Department, building permits for model homes only may be issued prior to recording of the Final Map.

B

CD (E)
The Community
Development Department
shall verify that the
owner/applicant has provided
the required recorded copy of
the final map to the CDD
prior to building permit
issuance in the subdivision.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

62. Recorded Final Map
Prior to issuance of building permits, the owner/applicant shall provide the Folsom-Cordova Unified School District with a copy of the recorded Final Map.

B

CD (P),
FCUSD

The Community
Development Department
shall verify that the
owner/applicant has provided
the required recorded copy of
the final map to the FCUSD
prior to building permit
issuance in the subdivision.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of a
building
permit.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

63. Credit Reimbursement Agreement
Prior to the recordation of the first Small-Lot Final Map, the owner/applicant and City shall enter into a credit and
reimbursement agreement for constructed improvements that are included in the Folsom Plan Area’s Public Facilities Financing Plan.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has
executed all of the required
Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fee Credit/Reimbursement
Agreements for the Phase 2B
subdivision. The executed
agreements are on file with
the Community Development
Department.

Yes

PARKS AND RECREATION REQUIREMENTS

64. Prior to issuance of the 640th overall Regency Active Adult Community building permit (excluding the 45 model home
building permits), the owner/applicant shall construct the 0.5-acre dog park. Prior to issuance of the 830th overall Regency Active Adult Community building permit (excluding the 47 model home building permits), the owner/applicant shall construct the 1.2-acre amphitheater park. The location and size of the aforementioned private parks shall be consistent with the location and size depicted on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map dated September 17, 2021.

B, OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community
Development Department
and Parks & Recreation
Department will monitor the
progress of development of
the Regency age-restricted
project to verify compliance
with this condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of the
604th and
830th
building
permits

65. Prior to the issuance of the last building permit within Regency Phase 2, the owner/applicant shall complete grading of the public trails on Lots H, I, J, and N, and the Class 1 trail parallel to Mangini Parkway on Lots Q and R, as shown on the Toll Brothers Public Trails System Modification Exhibit and the Phase 1 Small- Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, dated January 24, 2020 and Phase 2 Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map dated September 17, 2021.

B CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community
Development Department
and Parks & Recreation
Department will monitor the
progress of development of
the Regency age-restricted
project to verify compliance
with this condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance
of the last
building
permit in
Regency
Phase 2

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

66. The owner/applicant shall include the maintenance of all graded subdivision trails within the responsibility of the development Homeowner’s Association (HOA) until the Open Space and
Mangini Parkway are deeded to the City. The City shall not incur any maintenance responsibility or expense as a result of these trails until the transfer of Open Space ownership to the City is complete.

G, I, OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community
Development and Parks
Departments will monitor the
development of the project to
verify compliance with this
condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
City
acceptanc
e of the
Open
Space

67. The owner/applicant shall include the maintenance of all private trail connections within the responsibility of the development Homeowner’s Association (HOA) in perpetuity. The City shall not incur any maintenance responsibility or expense as a result of these private trail connections to the public trails within the subdivision. G, I, OG CD (E) (P), PR
The Community
Development and Parks
Departments will monitor the
development of the project to
verify compliance with this
condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
City
acceptanc
e of the
Open
Space

68. The owner/applicant shall include the maintenance of all 86.1-acres of Open Space (Measure W Open Space) and fuel modification buffers, in accordance with the Folsom Plan Area Open Space Master Plan, within the responsibility of the development Homeowner’s Association (HOA) until the Open Space is deeded to the City. The City shall not incur any maintenance
responsibility or expense as a result of this Open Space until the transfer of Open Space ownership to the City is complete. In addition, the Open Space shall not be deeded to the City until development on both sides adjacent to the Open Space are complete and at such a time the City is ready to take ownership.

OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community
Development and Parks
Departments will monitor the
development of the project to
verify compliance with this
condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
City
acceptanc
e of the
Open
Space

69. Parkland dedications shall be calculated as net acreage.

G, I CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community
Development and Parks
Departments will monitor the
development of the project to
verify compliance with this
condition.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
acceptanc
e of
Parkland.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Mitigation Measures

70. Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Project Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP). Table 1 below describes the mitigation measures from the FPASP (May 2011) MMRP, as amended by the Revised Proposed Water Supply Facility Alternative (November 2012), Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014), the Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment (September 2015), and the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Project.

No. Mitigation
Number
(Source)
Mitigation Measures Timing Responsible
Agency
Comments Conditioned
Satisfied
Aesthetics
71-1 3A.1-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Construct and Maintain a Landscape Corridor Adjacent to U.S. 50. The project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development application adjacent to U.S. 50 shall fund, construct, and maintain a landscaped corridor within the SPA, south of U.S. 50. This corridor shall be 50 feet wide, except that the landscaped corridor width shall be reduced to 25 feet adjacent to the proposed regional mall. Landscaping plans and specifications shall be approved by Caltrans and the City of Folsom, and constructed by the project applicant(s) before the start of earthmoving activities associated with residential or commercial units. Landscaped areas would not be required within the preserved oak woodlands. As practicable,
landscaping shall primarily contain native and/or drought tolerant plants. Landscaped corridors shall be maintained in perpetuity to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom.

1. Plans and
specifications: before
approval of grading
plans and building
permits

2. Construction: before
the approval of
occupancy permits
associated with
residential and
commercial units

3. Maintenance: in
perpetuity
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch
subdivision does not
have any frontage
along US HWY 50
and therefore this
condition does not
apply to the
subdivision.

Yes
71-2 3A.1-4
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Screen Construction Staging Areas. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall locate staging and material storage areas as far away from sensitive biological resources and sensitive land uses (e.g., residential areas, schools, parks) as feasible. Staging and material storage areas shall be approved by the appropriate agency (identified below) before the approval of grading plans for all project phases and shall be screened from adjacent occupied land uses in earlier development phases to the maximum extent practicable. Screens may include, but are not limited to, the use of such visual barriers such as berms or fences. The screen design shall be approved by the appropriate agency to further reduce visual effects to the extent possible.

Before approval of
grading plans and
during construction for
all project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department.

The construction
staging area for the
subdivision is not
located near any
existing sensitive
biological resources,
land uses or existing
residences. The
construction area is
shown on the plans for
the subdivision and
the plans have been
approved by the
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries shall be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, and Caltrans) to reduce to the extent feasible the visual effects of construction activities on adjacent project land uses that have already been developed.

Community
Development
Department.

71-3 3A.1-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Establish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and Implement a Lighting Plan.

To reduce impacts associated with light and glare, the City shall:
 Establish standards for on-site outdoor lighting to reduce high-intensity nighttime lighting and glare as part of the Folsom Specific Plan design guidelines/standards.

Consideration shall be given to design features, namely directional shielding for street lighting, parking lot
lighting, and other substantial light sources, that would reduce effects of nighttime lighting. In addition,
consideration shall be given to the use of automatic
shutoffs or motion sensors for lighting features to further reduce excess nighttime light.
 Use shielded or screened public lighting fixtures to prevent the light from shining off of the surface intended to be illuminated.

To reduce impacts associated with light and glare, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall:
 Shield or screen lighting fixtures to direct the light downward and prevent light spill on adjacent properties.  Flood and area lighting needed for construction activities, nighttime sporting activities, and/or security shall be screened or aimed no higher than 45 degrees above straight down (half-way between straight down and straight to the side) when the source is visible from any off-site
residential property or public roadway.

Before approval of
building permits.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community
Development
Department (CDD)
has reviewed and
approved lighting
plans for subdivision.

The plans are in
compliance with the
condition of approval

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 For public lighting in residential neighborhoods, prohibit the use of light fixtures that are of unusually high intensity or brightness (e.g., harsh mercury vapor, low-pressure
sodium, or fluorescent bulbs) or that blink or flash.
 Use appropriate building materials (such as low-glare glass, low-glare building glaze or finish, neutral, earth- toned colored paint and roofing materials), shielded or screened lighting, and appropriate signage in the
office/commercial areas to prevent light and glare from adversely affecting motorists on nearby roadways.
 Design exterior on-site lighting as an integral part of the building and landscape design in the Folsom Specific Plan area. Lighting fixtures shall be architecturally consistent with the overall site design.
 Lighting of off-site facilities within the City of Folsom shall be consistent with the City’s General Plan standards.  Lighting of the off-site detention basin shall be consistent with Sacramento County General Plan standards.
 Lighting of the two local roadway connections from
Folsom Heights off-site into El Dorado Hills shall be
consistent with El Dorado County General Plan standards.

A lighting plan for all on- and off-site elements within the each agency’s jurisdictional boundaries (specified below) shall be submitted to the relevant jurisdictional agency for review and approval, which shall include the above elements. The lighting plan may be submitted concurrently with other improvement plans, and shall be submitted before the installation of any lighting or the approval of building permits for each phase. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary
development application shall implement the approved lighting plan.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties).

Air Quality
71-4 3A.2-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Control Air Pollutant Emissions
Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements. To reduce short-term construction emissions, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall require their contractors to implement SMAQMD’s list of Basic Construction Emission Control Practices, Enhanced Fugitive PM Dust Control Practices, and Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices (list below) in effect at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. In addition to SMAQMD-recommended measures, construction operations
shall comply with all applicable SMAQMD rules and
regulations.

Basic Construction Emission Control Practices
 Water all exposed surfaces two times daily. Exposed
surfaces include, but are not limited to soil piles, graded areas, unpaved parking areas, staging areas, and access roads.
 Cover or maintain at least two feet of free board space on haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material on the site. Any haul trucks that would be traveling along freeways or major roadways should be covered.
 Use wet power vacuum street sweepers to remove any
visible trackout mud or dirt onto adjacent public roads at least once a day. Use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.  Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph).
 All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, parking lots to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In
addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
 Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes Before the approval of
all grading plans by
the City and
throughout project
construction, where
applicable, for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance
Consultant (Helix)
have reviewed all
MMRP conditions and
verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and
construction in the
Summer of 2022. The
compliance table is on
file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

(as required by the state airborne toxics control measure [Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of
Regulations]). Provide clear signage that posts this
requirement for workers at the entrances to the site.
 Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and
determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.

Enhanced Fugitive PM Dust Control Practices – Soil
Disturbance Areas
 Water exposed soil with adequate frequency for continued moist soil. However, do not overwater to the extent that sediment flows off the site.
 Suspend excavation, grading, and/or demolition activity when wind speeds exceed 20 mph.
 Plant vegetative ground cover (fast-germinating native grass seed) in disturbed areas as soon as possible. Water appropriately until vegetation is established.

Enhanced Fugitive PM Dust Control Practices – Unpaved
Roads
 Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site.
 Treat site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road with a 6 to 12-inch layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel to reduce generation of road dust and road dust
carryout onto public roads.
 Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the construction site regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The phone number of SMAQMD
and the City contact person shall also be posted to ensure compliance.

Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 The project shall provide a plan, for approval by the City of Folsom Community Development Department and
SMAQMD, demonstrating that the heavy-duty (50
horsepower [hp] or more) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased, and
subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet- average 20% NOX reduction and 45% particulate
reduction compared to the most current California Air
Resources Board (ARB) fleet average that exists at the
time of construction. Acceptable options for reducing
emissions may include use of late-model engines, low-
emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after-treatment products, and/or other options as they become available. The project applicant(s) of each project phase or its representative shall submit to the City of Folsom Community Development Department and
SMAQMD a comprehensive inventory of all off-road
construction equipment, equal to or greater than 50 hp, that would be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours during any portion of the construction project. The inventory shall include the horsepower rating, engine production year, and projected hours of use for each piece of equipment. The inventory shall be updated and submitted monthly
throughout the duration of the project, except that an
inventory shall not be required for any 30-day period in which no construction activity occurs. At least 48 hours prior to the use of heavy-duty off-road equipment, the
project representative shall provide SMAQMD with the
anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreman. SMAQMD’s Construction Mitigation Calculator
can be used to identify an equipment fleet that achieves this reduction (SMAQMD 2007a). The project shall ensure that emissions from all off-road diesel powered equipment used on the SPA do not exceed 40% opacity for more than three minutes in any one hour. Any equipment found to exceed 40

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

percent opacity (or Ringelmann 2.0) shall be repaired
immediately, and the City and SMAQMD shall be notified
within 48 hours of identification of noncompliant
equipment. A visual survey of all in-operation equipment shall be made at least weekly, and a monthly summary of the visual survey results shall be submitted throughout the duration of the project, except that the monthly summary shall not be required for any 30-day period in which no construction activity occurs. The monthly summary shall include the quantity and type of vehicles surveyed as well as the dates of each survey. SMAQMD staff and/or other
officials may conduct periodic site inspections to determine compliance. Nothing in this mitigation measure shall
supersede other SMAQMD or state rules or regulations.
 If at the time of construction, SMAQMD has adopted a
regulation or new guidance applicable to construction
emissions, compliance with the regulation or new guidance may completely or partially replace this mitigation if it is equal to or more effective than the mitigation contained herein, and if SMAQMD so permits.
71-5 3A.2-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOX
Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements.

Implementation of the project or the other four other action alternatives would result in construction-generated NO
X
emissions that exceed the SMAQMD threshold of significance, even after implementation of the SMAQMD Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices (listed in Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1a).

Additionally, Mitigation Measure 3A.4-1 (Implement
Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions, pages 3A.4-14 to 15) has the potential to both reduce and increase NO
X emissions, depending on the types of
alternative fuels and engine types employed. Therefore, the project applicant(s) shall pay SMAQMD an off-site mitigation fee for implementation of any of the five action alternatives for the purpose of reducing NO
X emissions to a less-than-
significant level (i.e., less than 85 lb/day). All NOX emission reductions and increases associated with GHG mitigation shall Before the approval of
all grading plans by
the City and
throughout project
construction for all
project phases.

The City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
shall not grant
any grading
permits to the
respective
project
applicant(s)
until the
respective
project
applicant(s)
have paid the
appropriate
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

be added to or subtracted from the amount above the
construction threshold to determine off-site mitigation fees, when possible. The specific fee amounts shall be calculated when the daily construction emissions can be more accurately determined: that is, if the City/USACE select and certify the EIR/EIS and approves the Proposed Project or one of the other four other action alternatives, the City and the applicants must establish the phasing by which development would occur, and the applicants must develop a detailed construction schedule.

Calculation of fees associated with each project development phase shall be conducted by the project applicant(s) in consultation with SMAQMD staff before the approval of
grading plans by the City. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay into SMAQMD’s off-site construction mitigation fund to further mitigate construction generated emissions of NO
X that exceed
SMAQMD’s daily emission threshold of 85 lb/day. The
calculation of daily NO
X emissions shall be based on the cost
rate established by SMAQMD at the time the calculation and payment are made. At the time of writing this EIR/EIS the cost rate is $16,000 to reduce 1 ton of NOX plus a 5% administrative fee (SMAQMD 2008c). The determination of the final
mitigation fee shall be conducted in coordination with
SMAQMD before any ground disturbance occurs for any
project phase. Based on information available at the time of writing this EIR/EIS, and assuming that construction would be performed at a consistent rate over a 19-year period (and averaging of 22 work days per month), it is estimated that the off-site construction mitigation fees would range from
$517,410 to $824,149, depending on which alternative is selected. Because the fee is based on the mass quantity of emissions that exceed SMAQMD’s daily threshold of
significance of 85 lb/day, total fees would be substantially greater if construction activity is more intense during some phases and less intense during other phases of the 19-year build out period, and in any event, based on the actual cost rate applied by SMAQMD. (This fee is used by SMAQMD to
purchase off-site emissions reductions. Such purchases are off-site
mitigation fee
to
SMAQMD.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

made through SMAQMD’s Heavy Duty Incentive Program,
through which select owners of heavy-duty equipment in
Sacramento County can repower or retrofit their old engines with cleaner engines or technologies.)
71-6 3A.2-1c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Analyze and Disclose Projected PM10 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resulting from Construction of On-Site Elements. Prior to construction of each discretionary development entitlement of on-site land uses, the project applicant shall perform a project-level CEQA analysis (e.g., supporting documentation for an exemption, negative
declaration, or project-specific EIR) that includes detailed dispersion modeling of construction-generated PM
10 to disclose
what PM10 concentrations would be at nearby sensitive
receptors. The dispersion modeling shall be performed in accordance with applicable SMAQMD guidance that is in place at the time the analysis is performed. At the time of writing this EIR/EIS, SMAQMD’s most current and most detailed guidance for addressing construction-generated PM
10 emissions is found
in its Guide to Air Quality Assessment in Sacramento County (SMAQMD 2009a). The project-level analysis shall
incorporate detailed parameters of the construction equipment and activities, including the year during which construction would be performed, as well as the proximity of potentially affected receptors, including receptors proposed by the project that exist at the time the construction activity would occur.

Before the approval of
all grading plans by
the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes
71-7 3A.2-2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement All Measures Prescribed by the Air Quality
Mitigation Plan to Reduce Operational Air Pollutant
Emissions.

To reduce operational emissions, the project
applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall implement all measures prescribed in the SMAQMD-approved Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Air
Quality Mitigation Plan (AQMP) (Torrence Planning 2008), a copy of which is included in Appendix C2. The AQMP is
intended to improve mobility, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality as required by AB 32 and SB 375. The AQMP includes, among others, measures designed to provide bicycle parking at commercial land uses, an integrated
pedestrian/bicycle path network, transit stops with shelters, a Before issuance of
subdivision maps or
improvement plans.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

prohibition against the use the wood-burning fireplaces, energy star roofing materials, electric lawnmowers provided to homeowners at no charge, and on-site transportation alternatives to passenger vehicles (including light rail) that provide connectivity with other local and regional alternative
transportation networks.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.
71-8 3A.2-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Develop and Implement a Plan to Reduce Exposure of
Sensitive Receptors to Construction-Generated Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall develop a plan to reduce the exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by project construction activity associated with buildout of the selected alternative. Each plan shall be developed by the project applicant(s) in consultation with SMAQMD. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before the approval of any grading plans.

The plan may include such measures as scheduling activities when the residences are the least likely to be occupied, requiring equipment to be shut off when not in use, and prohibiting heavy trucks from idling. Applicable measures shall be included in all project plans and specifications for all project phases.

The implementation and enforcement of all measures identified in each plan shall be funded by the project applicant(s) for the respective phase of development.

Before the approval of
all grading plans by
the City and
throughout project
construction, where
applicable, for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes
71-9 3A.2-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive
Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air
Contaminants.

The following measures shall be implemented
to reduce exposure of sensitive receptors to Toxic Air
Contaminants.
 Proposed commercial and industrial land uses that have the potential to emit TACs or host TAC-generating activity
(e.g., loading docks) shall be located away from existing and proposed on-site sensitive receptors such that they do not expose sensitive receptors to TAC emissions that
exceed an incremental increase of 10 in 1 million for the cancer risk and/or a noncarcinogenic Hazard Index of 1.0.

Before the approval of
all grading plans by
the SMAQMD and
throughout project
construction, where
applicable, for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 The multi-family residences planned across from the off- site corporation yard near the southwest corner of the SPA shall be set back as far as possible from the boundary of the corporation yard and/or relocated to another area.
 Where necessary to reduce exposure of sensitive receptors to an incremental increase of 10 in 1 million for the cancer risk and/or a noncarcinogenic Hazard Index of 1.0,
proposed commercial and industrial land uses that would host diesel trucks shall incorporate idle reduction strategies that reduce the main propulsion engine idling time through alternative technologies such as, IdleAire, electrification of truck parking, and alternative energy sources for TRUs, to allow diesel engines to be completely turned off.
 Signs shall be posted in at all loading docks and truck loading areas which indicate that diesel-powered delivery trucks must be shut off when not in use for longer than 5 minutes on the premises in order to reduce idling
emissions. This measure is consistent with the ATCM to
Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling,
which was approved by the California Office of
Administrative Law in January 2005.
 Implement the following additional guidelines, which are recommended in ARB’s Land Use Handbook: A
Community Health Perspective (ARB 2005) and are
considered to be advisory and not regulatory:
 Sensitive receptors, such as residential units and daycare centers, shall not be located in the same building as dry- cleaning operations that use perchloroethylene. Dry-
cleaning operations that use perchloroethylene shall not be located within 300 feet of any sensitive receptor. A setback of 500 feet shall be provided for operations with two or more machines.
 Large gasoline stations (defined as facilities with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater) and sensitive land uses shall not be sited within 300 feet of The compliance table is
on file with the City.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

each other. Small gasoline-dispensing facilities (less than

3.6 million gallons of throughput per year) and sensitive land uses shall not be sited within 50 feet of each other. 71-10 3A.2-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an
Asbestos Dust Control Plan.

A site investigation shall be
performed to determine whether and where NOA is present in the soil and rock on the SPA. The site investigation shall include the collection of soil and rock samples by a qualified geologist. If the site investigation determines that NOA is present on the SPA then the project applicant shall prepare an Asbestos Dust Control Plan for approval by SMAQMD as
required in Title 17, Section 93105 of the California Code of Regulations, “Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining
Operations.” The Asbestos Dust Control Plan shall specify measures, such as periodic watering to reduce airborne dust and ceasing construction during high winds. Measures in the Asbestos Dust Control Plan may include but shall not be limited to dust control measures required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1a. The project applicant shall submit the plan to the Folsom Community Development Department for review
and SMAQMD for review and approval before construction of the first project phase. SMAQMD approval of the plan must be received before any asbestos-containing rock (serpentinite) can be disturbed. Upon approval of the Asbestos Dust Control Plan by SMAQMD, the applicant shall ensure that construction contractors implement the terms of the plan throughout the construction period.

Before the approval of
all grading plans by
the City and
throughout project
construction, where
applicable, for all
project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant
obtained approval for an
Asbestos Dust
Mitigation Plan from the
SMAQMD prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The approved Asbestos
Dust Mitigation Plan is
on file with the
Community
Development
Department.

Yes
71-11 3A.2-6
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Control Exposure of Sensitive
Receptors to Operational Odorous Emissions. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall implement the following measures:
 The odor-producing potential of land uses shall be
considered when the exact type of facility that would
occupy areas zoned for commercial, industrial, or mixed- use land uses is determined. Facilities that have the
Before the approval of
building permits by the
City and throughout
project construction,
where applicable, for
all project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

potential to emit objectionable odors shall be located as far away as feasible from existing and proposed sensitive
receptors.
 The multi-family residences planned across from the off- site corporation yard near the southwest corner of the SPA shall be set back as far as possible from the boundary of the corporation yard and/or relocated to another area. (This measure is also required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b to limit exposure to TAC emissions.)
 Before the approval of building permits, odor control devices shall be identified to mitigate the exposure of receptors to objectionable odors if a potential odor-
producing source is to occupy an area zoned for
commercial, industrial, or mixed-use land uses. The
identified odor control devices shall be installed before the issuance of certificates of occupancy for the potentially odor-producing use. The odor producing potential of a
source and control devices shall be determined in
coordination with SMAQMD and based on the number of
complaints associated with existing sources of the same nature.
 The deeds to all properties located within the plan area that are within one mile of an on- or off-site area zoned or used for agricultural use (including livestock grazing) shall be accompanied by a written disclosure from the transferor, in a form approved by the City of Folsom, advising any
transferee of the potential adverse odor impacts from
surrounding agricultural operations, which disclosure shall direct the transferee to contact the County of Sacramento concerning any such property within the County zoned for agricultural uses within one mile of the subject property being transferred.
 Truck loading docks and delivery areas shall be located as far away as feasible from existing and proposed sensitive receptors.
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

This subdivision is
residential and is not
adjacent to any odorous
land uses and is not
adjacent to the future
Corporation Yard
.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Signs shall be posted at all loading docks and truck loading areas which indicate that diesel-powered delivery trucks must be shut off when not in use for longer than 5 minutes on the premises in order to reduce idling emissions. This measure is consistent with the ATCM to Limit Diesel-
Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, which was
approved by California’s Office of Administrative Law in January 2005. (This measure is also required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b to limit TAC emissions.)
 Proposed commercial and industrial land uses that have the potential to host diesel trucks shall incorporate idle
reduction strategies that reduce the main propulsion engine idling time through alternative technologies such as,
IdleAire, electrification of truck parking, and alternative energy sources for TRUs, to allow diesel engines to be
completely turned off. (This measure is also required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b to limit TAC emissions.)
Biological Resources
71-12 3A.3-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Design Stormwater Drainage Plans and Erosion and
Sediment Control Plans to Avoid and Minimize Erosion
and Runoff to All Wetlands and Other Waters That Are to Remain on the SPA and Use Low Impact Development
Features.

To minimize indirect effects on water quality and wetland hydrology, the project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development application shall include stormwater drainage plans and erosion and sediment control plans in their improvement plans and shall submit these plans to the City Public Works Department for review and approval. For off-site elements within Sacramento County or El Dorado County
jurisdiction (e.g., off-site detention basin and off-site roadway connections to El Dorado Hills), plans shall be submitted to the appropriate county planning department. Before approval of these improvement plans, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a NPDES MS4 Municipal Stormwater Permit and Grading
Before approval of
improvement and
drainage plans, and on
an ongoing basis
throughout and after
project construction, as
required for all project
phases.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Owner/applicant
has received a NPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water
Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP’s, monitoring
and reporting for
stormwater runoff.

The NPDES Permit
includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency
and baseline
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Permit, comply with the City’s Grading Ordinance and County drainage and stormwater quality standards, and commit to implementing all measures in their drainage plans and erosion and sediment control plans to avoid and minimize erosion and runoff into Alder Creek and all wetlands and other waters that would remain on-site. Detailed information about stormwater runoff standards and relevant City and County regulation is provided in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality.” The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development entitlement shall implement stormwater quality treatment controls consistent with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Placer Regions in effect at the time the application is submitted. Appropriate runoff controls such as berms, storm gates, off-stream detention basins, overflow collection areas, filtration systems, and sediment traps shall be implemented to control siltation and the potential discharge of pollutants. Development plans shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) features, such as pervious strips, permeable pavements, bioretention ponds, vegetated swales, disconnected rain gutter downspouts, and rain gardens, where appropriate. Use of LID features is recommended by the EPA to minimize impacts on water
quality, hydrology, and stream geomorphology and is specified as a method for protecting water quality in the proposed specific plan. In addition, free spanning bridge systems shall be used for all roadway crossings over wetlands and other waters that are retained in the on-site open space. These bridge systems would maintain the natural and restored channels of creeks, including the associated wetlands, and would be designed with sufficient span width and depth to provide for wildlife movement along the creek corridors even during high- flow or flood events, as specified in the 404 permit.

In addition to compliance with City ordinances, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Management Practices
(BMPs) that comply with the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Central Valley RWQCB, to reduce water
modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
SRWQCB. There are
no off-site elements
outside the City limits
for this subdivision.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

quality effects during construction. Detailed information about the SWPPP and BMPs are provided in Chapter 3A.9,
“Hydrology and Water Quality.”
Each project development shall result in no net change to peak flows into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, or to Buffalo Creek, Carson Creek, and Coyote Creek. The project
applicant(s) shall establish a baseline of conditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow conditions shall be established for 2- , 5-, and 100-year storm events. These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the stormwater system on the SPA. The baseline conditions, monitoring
standards, and a monitoring program shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. Water quality and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance standards, which are described in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality,” are met and shall be designed as off-stream detention basins. Discharge sites into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, as well as tributaries to Carson Creek, Coyote Creek, and Buffalo Creek, shall be monitored to ensure that pre-project conditions are being met.

Corrective measures shall be implemented as necessary. The mitigation measures will be satisfied when the monitoring standards are met for 5 consecutive years without undertaking corrective measures to meet the performance standard.

See FEIR/FEIS Appendix S showing that the detention basin in the northeast corner of the SPA has been moved off stream.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado County for the roadway connections, Sacramento
County for the detention basin west of Prairie City Road, and Caltrans for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements) such that the performance standards described in Chapter 3A.9,
“Hydrology and Water Quality,” are met.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-13 3A.3-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Secure Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions
and Values of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and
Waters of the State.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans and before any groundbreaking activity associated with each distinct discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application requiring fill of wetlands or other waters of the U.S. or waters of the state shall obtain all necessary permits under Sections 401 and 404 of the CWA or the state’s Porter-Cologne Act for the respective phase. For each respective discretionary development entitlement, all permits, regulatory approvals, and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats shall be secured before implementation of any grading activities within 250 feet of waters of the U.S. or wetland habitats or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, including waters of the state, that potentially support Federally listed species. The project applicant(s) shall commit to replace, restore, or enhance on a “no net loss” basis (in accordance with USACE and the Central Valley RWQCB) the acreage of all wetlands and other waters of the U.S. that would be removed, lost, and/or degraded with implementation of project plans for that development
increment. Wetland habitat shall be restored, enhanced, and/or replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the City, as
appropriate, depending on agency jurisdiction, and as
determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes. As part of the Section 404 permitting process, a draft wetland mitigation and monitoring plan (MMP) shall be
developed for the project on behalf of the project applicant(s).

Before any ground-disturbing activities in an area that would adversely affect wetlands and before engaging in mitigation activities associated with each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall submit the draft wetland MMP to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB,
Sacramento County, El Dorado County, and the City for review Before the approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities for any
project development
phase containing
wetland features or
other waters of the
U.S. The MMP must
be approved before
any impact on
wetlands can occur.

Mitigation shall be
implemented on an
ongoing basis
throughout and after
construction, as
required.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

The Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP’s, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has
recorded Declarations of
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

and approval of those portions of the plan over which they have jurisdiction. The MMP would have to be finalized prior to impacting any wetlands. Once the final MMP is approved and implemented, mitigation monitoring shall continue for a minimum of 5 years from completion of mitigation, or human intervention (including recontouring and grading), or until the performance standards identified in the approved MMP have been met, whichever is longer.

As part of the MMP, the project applicant(s) shall prepare and submit plans for the creation of aquatic habitat in order to adequately offset and replace the aquatic functions and services that would be lost at the SPA, account for the temporal loss of habitat, and contain an adequate margin of safety to reflect anticipated success. Restoration of previously altered and degraded wetlands shall be a priority of the MMP for offsetting losses of aquatic functions on the SPA because it is typically easier to achieve functional success in restored wetlands than in those created from uplands. The MMP must demonstrate how the aquatic functions and values that would be lost through project implementation will be replaced.

The habitat MMP for jurisdictional wetland features shall be consistent with USACE’s and EPA’s April 10, 2008 Final Rule for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources (33 CFR Parts 325 and 332 and 40 CFR Part 230) and
USACE’s October 26, 2010 Memorandum Re: Minimum Level
of Documentation Required for Permit Decisions. According to the Final Rule, mitigation banks should be given preference over other types of mitigation because a lot of the risk and uncertainty regarding mitigation success is alleviated by the fact that mitigation bank wetlands must be established and
demonstrating functionality before credits can be sold. The use of mitigation credits also alleviates temporal losses of wetland function while compensatory wetlands are being established.

Mitigation banks also tend to be on larger, more ecologically valuable parcels and are subjected to more rigorous scientific study and planning and implementation procedures than typical permittee-responsible mitigation sites (USACE and EPA, 2008).

Permittee-responsible on-site mitigation areas can be exposed to Covenants &
Restrictions (DCR’s) in
compliance with the
requirements of the
USACE permit. The
DCR’s are shown on the
final map.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

long-term negative effects of surrounding development since they tend to be smaller and less buffered than mitigation banks.

The Final Rule also establishes a preference for a “watershed approach” in selecting locations for compensatory mitigation project locations, that mitigation selection must be “appropriate and practicable” and that mitigation banks must address watershed needs based on criteria set forth in the Final Rule. The watershed approach accomplishes this objective by expanding the informational and analytic basis of mitigation project site selection decisions and ensuring that both authorized impacts and mitigation are considered on a watershed scale rather than only project by project. This requires a degree of flexibility so that district engineers can authorize mitigation projects that most effectively address the case-specific circumstances and needs of the watershed, while remaining practicable for the permittee. The SPA includes portions of the Alder Creek, Buffalo Creek, Coyote Creek, and Carson Creek Watersheds. The majority of the SPA is within the Alder Creek Watershed. Alder Creek and Buffalo Creek are part of the Lower American River Watershed. Carson Creek and Coyote Creek are part of the Cosumnes River
Watershed. Mitigation credits may be available within the Cosumnes Watershed, but not within the American River
Watershed and not within the sub-watersheds of the SPA.

Therefore, aquatic habitats may need to be restored or created on the SPA and adjacent off-site lands, preferably within the affected watersheds, in order to successfully replace lost functions at the appropriate watershed scale where loss of function would occur. It is not likely feasible to provide compensatory mitigation for all aquatic resource impacts on site.

Therefore, a combination of on-site and off-site permittee- responsible mitigation and mitigation banking would likely be necessary to achieve the no-net-loss standard.

The SPA is located within the service areas of several approved mitigation banks (e.g., Bryte Ranch, Clay Station, Fitzgerald Ranch, and Twin City Mitigation Bank). The majority of
compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is proposed to be accomplished at an agency approved mitigation bank or banks authorized to sell credits to offset impacts in the SPA. The

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

applicants’ biological consultant, ECORP, has identified availability of approximately 31 vernal pool credits and 228 seasonal wetland credits at mitigation banks whose service area includes the SPA. Additional credits may also be available from pending, but not yet approved, mitigation banks.

However, availability is subject to change and, as noted above, a combination of mitigation bank credits and permittee- responsible on and off-site mitigation may be necessary to fully offset project impacts on wetlands and other waters of the U.S.

If USACE determines that the use of mitigation bank credits is not sufficient mitigation to offset impacts within the SPA, the October 26, 2010 Memorandum Re: Minimum Level of
Documentation Required for Permit Decisions requires USACE to specifically demonstrate why the use of bank credits is not acceptable to USACE in accordance with Section 33 CFR
332.3(a)(1).

Compensatory mitigation for losses of stream and intermittent drainage channels shall follow the Final Rule Guidelines, which specify that compensatory mitigation should be achieved through in-kind preservation, restoration, or enhancement within the same watershed, subject to practicability
considerations. The wetland MMP shall address how to
mitigate impacts on vernal pool, seasonal swale, seasonal wetland, seep, marsh, pond, and intermittent and perennial stream habitat, and shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or mitigate any off-site project- related impacts. The wetland compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
 Compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites. In General, compensatory mitigation sites should meet the following criteria, based on the Final Rule;
 located within the same watershed as the wetland or other waters that would be lost, as appropriate and practicable;  located in the most likely position to successfully replace wetland functions lost on the impact site considering
watershed-scale features such as aquatic habitat diversity,

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

habitat connectivity, available water sources and
hydrologic relationships, land use trends, ecological
benefits, and compatibility with adjacent land uses, and the likelihood for success and sustainability;
 A complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site preservation areas and off-site
compensatory mitigation areas, including wetland
functional assessment using the California Rapid
Assessment Method (CRAM) (Collins et al. 2008), or
other appropriate wetland assessment protocol as
determined through consultation with USACE and the
USFWS, to establish baseline conditions;
 Specific creation and restoration plans for each mitigation site;
 Use of CRAM to compare compensatory wetlands to the
baseline CRAM scores from wetlands in the SPA. The
compensatory wetland CRAM scores shall be compared
against the highest quality wetland of each type from the SPA;
 CRAM scores, or other wetland assessment protocol
scores, from the compensatory wetlands shall be compared against the highest quality wetland scores for each wetland type to document success of compensatory wetlands in
replacing the functions of the affected wetlands to be
replaced;
 Monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements, and the following elements:
 ecological performance standards, based on the best
available science, that can be assessed in a practicable manner (e.g., performance standards proposed by Barbour et al. 2007). Performance standards must be based on
attributes that are objective and verifiable;
 assessments conducted annually for 5 years after
construction or restoration of compensatory wetlands to determine whether these areas are acquiring wetland

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

functions and to plot the performance trajectory of
preserved, restored, or created wetlands over time.
 assessments results for compensatory wetlands shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands
assessed in the same year;
 assessments analysis conducted annually for 5 years after any construction adjacent to wetlands preserved on the
SPA to determine whether these areas are retaining
functions and values. Assessments results for wetlands
preserved on site shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
 analysis of assessments data, including assessment of potential stressors, to determine whether any remedial
activities may be necessary;
 corrective measures if performance standards are not met;  monitoring of plant communities as performance criteria (annual measure of success, during monitoring period)
and success criteria (indicative of achievement of
mitigation habitat requirement at end of monitoring
period) for hydrologic function have become established and the creation site “matures” over time;
 GIS analysis of compensatory wetlands to demonstrate
actual acreage of functioning wetland habitat;
 adaptive management measures to be applied if
performance standards and acreage requirements are not
being met;
 responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and
 responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or corrective actions.

A final operations and management plan (OMP) for all on- and off-site permittee-sponsored wetland preservation and
mitigation areas shall be prepared and submitted to USACE

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

and USFWS for review, comment and preliminary approval
prior to the issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. The plan shall include detailed information on the habitats present within the preservation and mitigation areas, the long-term management and monitoring of these habitats, legal protection for the preservation and mitigation areas (e.g., conservation easement, declaration of restrictions), and funding mechanism information (e.g., endowment). A final OMP for each discretionary development entitlement affecting wetlands must be approved prior to construction.

USACE has determined that the project will require an
individual permit. In its final stage and once approved by USACE, the MMP for the project is expected to detail
proposed wetland restoration, enhancement, and/or replacement activities that would ensure no net loss of aquatic functions in the project vicinity. Approval and implementation of the wetland MMP shall aim to fully mitigate all unavoidable impacts on jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including jurisdictional wetlands. In addition to USACE approval, approval by the City, Sacramento County, El Dorado County, and the Central Valley RWQCB, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes, will also be required.

Approvals from Sacramento County and El Dorado County
shall be required for impacts resulting from off-site project elements occurring in these counties, such as the off-site detention basin in Sacramento County and the roadway
connections into El Dorado County. To satisfy the requirements of the City and the Central Valley RWQCB, mitigation of impacts on the nonjurisdictional wetlands beyond the
jurisdiction of USACE shall be included in the same MMP. All mitigation requirements determined through this process shall be implemented before grading plans are approved. The MMP shall be submitted to USACE and approved prior to the
issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. Water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA will be required before issuance of a Section 404 permit. Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

project applicant(s) shall obtain water quality certification for the project. Any measures required as part of the issuance of water quality certification shall be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans, El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).
71-14 3A.3-2B
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson’s Hawk and Other Raptor
Nests. To mitigate impacts on Swainson’s hawk and other raptors (including burrowing owl), the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the SPA and active burrows on the SPA. The surveys shall be conducted before the approval of grading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of
construction for all project phases. To the extent feasible, guidelines provided in Recommended Timing and
Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in the
Central Valley (Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory
Committee 2000) shall be followed for surveys for Swainson’s hawk. If no nests are found, no further mitigation is required.

If active nests are found, impacts on nesting Swainson’s hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishing appropriate buffers around the nests. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until the young have fledged, the nest is no longer active, or until a qualified biologist has determined in consultation with DFG that reducing the buffer would not result in nest abandonment. DFG guidelines recommend
implementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile-wide buffers, but the size of the buffer may be adjusted if a qualified biologist and the City, in consultation with DFG, determine that such an
adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect the nest.

Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after construction activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest.

Before the approval of
grading and
improvement plans,
before any ground
disturbing activities,
and during project
construction as
applicable for all
project phases.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

If active burrows are found, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-disturbing activities.

The City shall consult with DFG. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors on all burrows to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial burrows within the project vicinity, as needed; however, burrow owl exclusions may only be used if a qualified biologist verifies that the burrow does not contain eggs or dependent young. If active burrows contain eggs and/or young, no
construction shall occur within 50 feet of the burrow until young have fledged. Once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside burrows, these burrows may be collapsed.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans), such that the performance criteria set forth in DFG’s guidelines are
determined to be met.
71-15 3A.3-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2b: Prepare and Implement a
Swainson’s Hawk Mitigation Plan.

To mitigate for the loss of Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Swainson’s hawk mitigation plan including, but not limited to the requirements described below.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first, the project applicant(s) shall preserve, to the satisfaction of the City or Sacramento County, as appropriate depending on
agency jurisdiction, suitable Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1:1 mitigation of habitat value for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat lost as a result of the project, as determined by the City, or Sacramento County, after consultation with DFG and a qualified biologist.

The 1:1 habitat value shall be based on Swainson’s hawk nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, Before the approval of
grading, improvement,
or construction plans
and before any ground
disturbing activity in
any project
development phase
that would affect
Swainson’s hawk
foraging habitat.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

availability, and use within the City’s planning area, or Sacramento County jurisdiction. The mitigation ratio shall be consistent with the 1994 DFG Swainson’s Hawk Guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California, which call for the following mitigation ratios for loss of foraging habitat in these categories: 1:1 if within 1 mile of an active nest site, 0.75:1 if over 1 mile but less than 5 miles, and 0.5:1 if over 5 miles but less than 10 miles from an active nest site. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through credit purchase from an established mitigation bank approved to sell Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat credits to mitigate losses in the SPA, if available, or through the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento County. The City, or Sacramento County if outside City
jurisdiction, after consultation with DFG, will determine the appropriateness of the mitigation land.

Before approval of such proposed mitigation, the City, or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin, shall consult with DFG regarding the appropriateness of the
mitigation. If mitigation is accomplished through conservation easement, then such an easement shall ensure the continued management of the land to maintain Swainson’s hawk foraging values, including but not limited to ongoing agricultural uses and the maintenance of all existing water rights associated with the land. The conservation easement shall be recordable and shall prohibit any activity that substantially impairs or diminishes the land’s capacity as suitable Swainson’s hawk habitat.

The project applicant(s) shall transfer said Swainson’s hawk mitigation land, through either conservation easement or fee title, to a third party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and DFG named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 815.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City or County, after consultation with DFG. The City, or County, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form of the conservation easement.

The City, or County, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the
easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

The project applicant(s), after consultation with the City, or County of jurisdiction, DFG, and the Conservation Operator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial
mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement of the
conservation easement. If an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City’s jurisdiction or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin to be distributed to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nonprofit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity. The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest of any conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior written approval of the City and DFG. Mitigation lands established or acquired for impacts incurred at the off-site detention basin shall require approval from Sacramento County prior to sale or transfer of mitigation lands or conservation easement.

If the Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transferred to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG, or Sacramento County and DFG depending on jurisdiction of the affected habitat. The City Planning Department shall ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City’s planning area is properly established and is functioning as habitat by reviewing regular monitoring reports prepared by the Conservation Operator of the mitigation site(s).

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Monitoring of the mitigation site(s) shall continue for the first 10 years after establishment of the easement and shall be funded through the endowment, or other appropriate funding mechanism, established by the project applicant(s). Sacramento County shall review the monitoring reports for impacts on habitat at the off-site detention basin.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County and Caltrans).
71-16 3A.3-2c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird
Nesting Colonies. To avoid and minimize impacts to tricolored blackbird, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall conduct a preconstruction survey for any project activity that would occur during the tricolored blackbird’s nesting season (March 1–August 31). The preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist before any activity occurring within 500 feet of suitable nesting habitat, including freshwater marsh and areas of riparian scrub vegetation. The survey shall be conducted within 14 days before project activity begins.

If no tricolored blackbird colony is present, no further mitigation is required. If a colony is found, the qualified biologist shall establish a buffer around the nesting colony. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active.

The size of the buffer shall be determined in consultation with DFG. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature of the project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, and other relevant
circumstances.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries (i.e., U.S. 50 interchange improvements) must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans) and must be sufficient to achieve the performance criteria described above.

Before the approval of
any ground-disturbing
activity within 500 feet
of suitable nesting
habitat as applicable
for all project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-17 3A.3-2d
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts.

The project applicant of all project phases containing potential bat roosting habitat shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for roosting bats. Surveys shall be conducted in the fall to determine if the mine shaft is used as a hibernaculum and in spring and/or summer to determine if it is used as a maternity or day roost. Surveys shall consist of evening emergence surveys to note the presence or absence of bats and could consist of visual surveys at the time of emergence. If evidence of bat use is observed, the number and species of bats using the roost shall be determined. Bat detectors may be used to supplement survey efforts. If no bat roosts are found, then no further study shall be required.

If roosts of pallid bat or Townsend’s big-eared bats are determined to be present and must be removed, the bats shall be excluded from the roosting site. A mitigation program
addressing compensation, exclusion methods, and roost
removal procedures shall be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation. Exclusion methods may include use of one-way doors at roost entrances (bats may leave but not reenter), or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be
restricted during periods of sensitive activity (e.g., during hibernation or while females in maternity colonies are nursing young). The loss of each roost (if any) will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction and
installation of bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.

Before the approval of
any ground-disturbing
activity within 500 feet
of suitable nesting
habitat as applicable
for all project phases.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes
71-18 3A.3-2g
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal
Pool Invertebrates and Implement All Permit Conditions.

No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for Federally listed vernal pool invertebrates, or within adequate buffer areas (250 feet or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with Before the approval of
any grading or
improvement plans,
before any ground
disturbing activities
within 250 feet of said
U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
District; U.S.

Fish and
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

approval from USFWS), until a biological opinion (BO) or Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) letter has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development entitlements affecting such areas have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site construction. Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation
describing methods to protect existing vernal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1a, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss of vernal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation of habitat, account for the temporal loss of habitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards are not met.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vernal pool habitat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss of acreage, function, and value of affected vernal pool habitat. The final habitat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of 404 Permits for Projects with Relatively Small Effects on Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction of the Sacramento Field Office, California (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an
alternative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat acreage,
function, and value.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application “potentially affecting vernal pool habitat” shall ensure that there is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and restoration of vernal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health.

This standard shall be accomplished by requiring the project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application affecting vernal pool or seasonal wetland habitat to identify the habitat or lesser
distance deemed
sufficiently protective
by a qualified biologist
with approval from
USFWS, and on an
ongoing basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for all
project phases as
required by the
mitigation plan, BO,
and/or BMPs.

Wildlife
Service; and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

extent of indirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identifying all such habitat within 250 feet of project construction activities or by providing an alternative technical evaluation. If a lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage of vernal pool habitat for each wetted acre of any indirectly affected vernal pool habitat at a ratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion of the Section 7
consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet of the habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS. The project applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for direct or indirect impacts that have already been mitigated to the satisfaction of USFWS through another BO or mitigation plan (i.e., if impacts on specific habitat acreage are mitigated by one project phase or element, the project applicant(s) will not be required to mitigate for it again in another phase of the project).

A standard set of BMPs shall be applied to construction occurring in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USFWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality - Land” for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).
71-19 3A.3-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4a: Secure and Implement
Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a Section 1602 streambed alteration Before the approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any construction
California
Department
of Fish and
Game and
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

agreement from DFG for all construction activities that would occur in the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds on the SPA. As a condition of issuance of the streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting riparian habitat shall hire a qualified restoration ecologist to prepare a riparian habitat MMP. The draft MMP shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or
compensate for impacts on the stream channel of Alder Creek and other drainage channels within DFG jurisdiction, and the bed and banks of the on-site ponds. Mitigation measures may include establishment or restoration of riparian habitat within the project’s open space areas along preserved stream corridors, riparian habitat restoration off-site, or preservation and enhancement of existing riparian habitat either on or off the SPA. The compensation habitat shall be similar in composition and structure to the habitat to be removed and shall be at ratios adequate to offset the loss of riparian habitat functions and services at the SPA. The riparian habitat compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
 compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites;
 complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
 site-specific management procedures to benefit
establishment and maintenance of native riparian plant
species, including black willow, arroyo willow, white
alder, and Fremont cottonwood;
 a planting and irrigation program if needed for
establishment of native riparian trees and shrubs at
strategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and irrigation may not be necessary if preservation of
functioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or if restoration can be accomplished without irrigation or
planting);
activities (including
clearing and grubbing)
that affect the bed and
bank or riparian and
freshwater marsh
habitat associated with
Alder Creek and other
on-site or off-site
drainage channels and
ponds.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 in kind reference habitats for comparison with
compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and
success criteria) to document success;
 monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be
monitored for a minimum period of five years);
 ecological performance standards, based on the best
available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount of dead woody vegetation gaps and bare ground, and
survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation
planting sites must achieve 80% survival of planted
riparian trees and shrubs by the end of the five-year
maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying
trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
 corrective measures if performance standards are not met;  responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and
 responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or
corrective actions.

Any conditions of issuance of the Streambed Alteration
Agreement shall be implemented as part of project construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage
channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site drainage channels under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and riparian habitat.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the Caltrans.
71-20 3A.3-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Conduct Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass
Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization
Measures or Compensatory Mitigation.

The project
applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine if valley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concurrently with any special-status plant surveys conducted on site as special-status plant surveys are floristic in nature, i.e. require that all species encountered be identified, and require preparation of a plant community map. If valley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report to the City of Folsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any of the off-site project elements.

If valley needlegrass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent of the community shall be mapped and the acreage of this community type, if any, that would be removed by project implementation shall be calculated. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting valley needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City of Folsom to determine appropriate mitigation for removal of valley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation. Mitigation measures shall include one or more of the following components sufficient to achieve no net loss of valley needlegrass grassland acreage:
establishment of valley needlegrass grassland within project’s open space areas currently characterized by annual grassland, establishment of valley needlegrass grassland off-site, or preservation and enhancement of existing valley needlegrass grassland either on or off the SPA. The applicant(s) shall compensate for any loss of valley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation at a minimum 1:1
replacement ratio.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-21 3A.3-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak
Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees
Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize
Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees Retained On Site.

The
project applicant(s) shall prepare an oak woodland mitigation and monitoring plan. The project applicant(s) of all on- and off- site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or
individual trees shall adhere to the requirements described below, which are consistent with those outlined in California Public Resources Code 21083.4. Pursuant to Sacramento
County General Plan policy, the acreage of oak woodland habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculated as the oak tree canopy area within stands of oak trees having greater than 10% cover plus a 30-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge of the tree canopy. Oak trees located in areas greater than 30 feet from stands meeting the greater than 10% tree canopy cover criterion were
considered isolated trees and not part of the blue oak woodland community. Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below.
 Preserve approximately 399 acres of existing oak
woodland habitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion of ground verification by a qualified arborist, the actual amount of oak woodland present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount
preserved could also be slightly greater or lesser than 399 acres).
 Create 243 acres of oak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination of blue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees in the following SPA locations:
 Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase
containing protected
trees or oak woodland.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant
obtained a Tree Permit
from the Community
Development
Department for the
removal of protected
oak trees that were
impacted by the
grading and
construction of Phase
3 of the Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch
project.

The Tree Permit was
approved prior to
commencement of
grading and
construction in the
Summer of 2022. The
owner/applicant paid
in-lieu fees for the
removal of some trees,
the City approved a
Tree Replacement
Plan for another
portion of the tree that
were removed and
preserved existing oak
trees in El Dorado
County for the
remaining mitigation
for the total number of
protected trees in
accordance with this
condition.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 Preserve and passive open space zones throughout the
SPA.
 Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak
woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e. catch slopes).
 Other practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space.
 Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodland mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
 A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defined below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination of acorns, seedlings,
and various sizes of container trees (#1 container, #5
container, #15 container) or transplanted trees shall be incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) shall have a minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
 One established acorn equals one unit (acorns will be over planted to maximize potential germination).
 One oak seedling equals one unit.
 One #1 container oak tree equals two units.
 One #5 container oak tree equals three units.
 One #15 container oak tree equals four units.
 One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
 One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh).
 Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to
augment overall habitat values. Each non oak tree species shall represent unit values described above for oak trees,

The Conservation
Easements within the
Phase 3 portion of the
subdivision were fenced
off around their
boundaries in advance of
the commencement of
grading and construction
and the City verified
compliance by
inspecting the fence in
advance of grading.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

but non oak species shall comprise no more than 10% of
the mitigation plantings.
 Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland
habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento and El Dorado Counties may be secured and
placed under conservation easement in lieu of onsite
mitigation measures if necessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.  Create oak woodlands off site. Plant a combination of blue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees at off-site location(s), if needed to achieve the creation goal of 243 acres of new blue oak woodland habitat. This measure would only be
needed if 243 acres of blue oak woodland could not be
created in the SPA. Off-site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation. Off-site tree planting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally support
blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed
through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to project development. Planted areas
shall be placed under conservation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.
 The oak woodland mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant(s) shall include a maintenance and monitoring program for any replacement trees. The program shall
include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria. Replacement oak trees shall be
maintained and monitored for a minimum of eight years
from the date of planting and irrigation shall be provided to planted trees for the first five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80%
survival rate for planted trees by the end of the eight-year maintenance and monitoring period. Dead and dying trees

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80%
survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning
Department. The security will be forfeited if the project applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and monitoring and meet the success criteria.

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation
The project applicant(s) of all on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated trees and the off-site Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S. 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; and the underground sewer force main shall develop a map depicting the tree canopy of all oak trees in the survey area and identifying the acreage of tree canopy that would be preserved and the acreage that would be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak trees (those not located within the delineated boundary of oak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director. As a condition of the tree removal permit, project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement.

The City’s Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project applicants have developed a plan, as set forth Section 10 of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (attached to this EIR/EIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide
compensatory mitigation for removal of protected trees in the SPA. In addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the following elements shall be included in a protected tree mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and agreed upon by the City:
 Project applicant(s) of projects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered
professional forester to perform a determinate survey of tree species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas of the project site proposed for tree removal and
encroachment of development. The condition of individual

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
 5 = Excellent; No problems – tree has no structural
problems, branches are properly spaced and tree
characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.
 4 = Good; No apparent problems – tree is in good
condition and no apparent problems from visual
inspection. If potential structural or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and
more serious health problems can be averted.
 3 = Fair; Minor problems – There are some minor
structural or health problems that pose no immediate
danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist
report are completed correctly the defect(s) can be
minimized or eliminated.
 2 = Poor; Major problems – the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with correct
arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe
removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. If the
recommended actions are completed correctly, hazard can be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. If no action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed.
 1 = Hazardous or non correctable condition – the tree is in extremely poor condition and in non-reversible decline.

This rating is assigned to a tree that has structural and/or health problems that no amount of tree care work or effort can change. The issues may or may not be considered a
dangerous situation. The tree may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an unacceptable risk of spreading the disease or pests(s) to other trees.

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

 0 = Dead – the tree has no significant signs of life (dead or very close to being dead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criteria
 The determination for whether an isolated tree shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed
with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the
condition and size of the tree as follows:
 Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation.  Trees rated 2 may be removed at 50% of the normal
Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.
 Trees rated 3, 4, and/or 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.
 Native isolated oaks measuring 24 inches or greater dbh for a single trunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rated a 3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the
tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties.
 Native oaks measuring between 12 and 24 inches dbh and rated a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the
tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated 2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation
planting criteria described here) would result.
 Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 12 inches dbh shall not be removed unless
unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation
planting criteria described here) would result.
 Native oak trees measuring 1 inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated,
included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated a 3, 4, or a 5. Credits shall only be accepted if the tree protection zone (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge of the tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater trees are
protected on a construction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List. STPC shall not count if they the tree is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected tree to be preserved. The City shall
accept the preservation of native oak trees in this size class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC criteria:
 Folsom Municipal Code requires one of the following be planted as compensation for each diameter inch of
protected tree removed:
 half of a 24-inch box tree;
 one #15 container tree;
 two #5 container trees; or
 $150 in-lieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution.
 The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and irrigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The plan shall include a 5-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acorns with an annual monitoring report that includes corrections needed with proposed work plan, and notice of compliance within 90-days of annual
monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The security will be forfeited if the project

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

applicant or designated responsible party fails to fulfill the Planting and Maintenance Agreement.
 To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected trees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all
affected project phases shall install high visibility fencing outside the outer edge of the drip lines of all trees to be retained on the SPA during project construction. The
fencing may be installed around groups or stands of trees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines of all trees are protected. Grading, trenching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, irrigation, and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines of protected trees). If the activities listed cannot be avoided within the drip line of a particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and
compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the tree in question shall be monitored for a period of five years and replaced only if the tree appears to be dead or dying within five years of project implementation.

Through a combination of the mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation of blue oak woodland habitat in the open space areas, the project
applicant(s) can satisfy the mitigation requirements for removal of trees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined through consultation with the Sacramento County Planning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with Caltrans.
71-22 WS-1
(Addendum
)
Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for
Construction Employees.

Prior to beginning construction activities, the Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

The training shall describe the importance of onsite biological resources, including special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests of special-status birds; and roosting habitat for special- status bats. The biologist shall also explain the importance of other responsibilities related to the protection of wildlife during construction such as inspecting open trenches and looking under vehicles and machinery prior to moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to brief them on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation
requirements. If new construction personnel are added to the project, the contractor’s superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before starting work.

An environmental awareness handout that describes and
illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

71-23 WS-2
(Addendum
)
Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vernal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for western spadefoot. If no western spadefoot individuals are found during the
preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If western spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
within suitable tadpole
habitat.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

71-24 NWPT-1
(Addendum
)
Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle
Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable habitat for northwestern pond turtle. If no northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be
required. If northwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity of the project.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
within suitable
northwestern pond
turtle habitat.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes
71-25 NB-1
(Addendum
)
Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey.

The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within 14 days prior to commencement of construction during the nesting season (1 February through 31 August).

If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW.

The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent of the nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist. Once the young are independent of the nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside of the nesting season.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City
.

Yes
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
71-26 3A.5-1a
(Addendum)
Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.

The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identifying historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those During all construction
phases
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
On June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

adverse effects as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department.
71-27 3A.5-1b
(Addendum)
Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural
Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform
Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be
Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables and
management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly
reference the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each
individual development phase or off-site element, the
applicable oversight agency (City of Folsom, El Dorado
County, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) of all project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
 The project applicant shall retain the services of a qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site
element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified
resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identify locations that are Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
On June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department.

Yes

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of known resources, geomorphology, and
topography. The inventory report shall specify the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate.
 The identification of any sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction of each individual
development phase shall be performed in concert with
monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.
 For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency’s direction) shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of “significant” (under CEQA) cultural
resources. These findings shall be reviewed by the
applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and treatment measures provided in this
EIR/EIS.
 Where possible, the project shall be configured or
redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources.

Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place if possible, as suggested under California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance of historic properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public
Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800.
 Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases (under the applicable agency’s direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measures that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist of

03/02/2026 Item No.5.

data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because of the data they contain (which may
contribute to research). Alternatively, for historical
architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive,
narrative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIR/EIS.
 To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare an appropriate
prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate treatment.
 These steps and documents may be combined with the
phasing of management and documents prepared pursuant
to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).
71-28 3A.5-2
(Addendum)
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-
Site Monitoring If Required, Stop Work if Cultural
Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.

To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following:
 Before the start of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
On June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
Yes