Folsom City Council
February 10, 2026

1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
February 10, 2026, 6:30 PM

Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers generally have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, February 10, 2026 6:30 PM

Justin Raithel, Mayor

Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Barbara Leary, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Leary, Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Raithel The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item w ill be continued to a future Council meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are generally limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

3 CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

1. Approval of the January 27, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes

2. Approval of the January 28, 2026 City Council Special Meeting Minutes

3. Mayor’s Appointment and Confirmation by the City Council of Planning Commissioner to Serve on the Historic District Commission

4. Resolution No. 11533 – A Resolution Approving the Historic District Commission’s Recommendation for Approval of a Design Review for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project Located at 115 Wool Street and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA Under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines

5. Resolution No. 11546 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with REY Engineering, Inc. for Contract Development Engineering Management Staff Services up to $200,000 Utilizing Salary and Benefit Cost Savings from the General Fund (Fund 010)

6. Resolution No. 11547- A Resolution Electing to Participate in and Authorizing the City Manager to Implement the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act in Conformance with Public Contract Code 22010

7. Resolution No. 11549- A Resolution Accepting 2023 and 2025 Growth Funding and 2024 Initial Funding, Citizen’s Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grants for the Purchase of Technology, Recruiting/Promotion Services and Equipment to Improve Police Operations in Accordance with State Requirements and Appropriation of Funds in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012)

8. Resolution No. 11550- A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program Offered by the California Highway Patrol to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Provide DUI Enforcement and Training, and Purchase Police Vehicles

9. Resolution No. 11551- A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant Offered by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Distracted Driving, Seat Belt Enforcement, and Purchase of Police Vehicles
OLD BUSINESS:

10. Resolution No. 11543 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Approve an Additional Contingency in the Amount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 24-052) with Euro Style Management for the Construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

11. Resolution No. 11544 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 24-039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for $583,399 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

4 12. Resolution No. 11545 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 24-006) with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for $84,000 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

13. Resolution No. 11548– A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineers Report, Declaring the Intention to Order the Formation of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2, to Levy and Collect Assessments, to Provide Notice of Public Hearing and Direct the Mailing of Assessment Ballots Within the Proposed District in the City of Folsom NEW BUSINESS:

14. Update and Discussion Regarding Countywide Homelessness Shared Governance

15. Update and Direction on Senate Bill (SB) 802 Ashby

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the abov e decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

This meeting of the City Council is recorded with closed captioning. The recording will be cablecast on Metro Cable Channel 14, the local government affairs channel on the Comcast and DirecTV U -Verse cable system, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The recording will also be video streamed at metro14live.saccounty.gov.The City does not control

5 scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

6 This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 27, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Regular Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday January 27, 2026 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm with Mayor Raithel presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Justin Raithel, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: None

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The pledge of allegiance was recited.

AGENDA UPDATE
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking advised that there was additional information for Item No. 6.

BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

There were no requests to speak under this item.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Recognition of 2025 Folsom Holiday Lights Contest Winners Mayor Raithel introduced this item. Folsom Times Bill Sullivan thanked the City of Folsom and businesses for their partnership and announced the winners in the following categories:

Holly Jolly Residence – Best overall residence:
488 Rockport Circle
Clark Griswold – Best use of holiday lights (residential):
275 Thorndike Way
Hollywood Christmas – Best use of theme and/or fictional characters (residential):

02/10/2026 Item No.1.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 27, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2

316 Turn Pike Drive
Merry and Bright Business – Festive commercial business display:

Sutter Street
Illuminate the Block – Best multi-house display:

Ledgemont Court

2. Presentation from the Folsom Auburn Trail Riders Action Coalition (FATRAC) on the Public - Private Partnership Supporting the Rebuild of the Folsom Bike Park Senior Management Analyst Jamison Larson introduced the item. A presentation was then made by Deborah Young, Executive Director of FATRAC, along with Lucas Raley, FATRAC Board Member and Randy Spangler, Designer and Builder. The presenters responded to questions from the City Council.

3. Presentation from the Folsom Police Department Regarding E-Bikes in Our City: Current Status and Future Direction
Police Chief Adam Green made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

Lieutenant Jacob VerHalen and City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional information.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

4. Approval of the January 13, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

5. Resolution No. 11541 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2C Subdivision

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Rohrbough to approve Item Nos. 4- 5 of the Consent Calendar. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

PUBLIC HEARING:

6. Resolution No. 11539 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of Majority Protest Proceedings and Modifying the Assessment Rate of the Folsom Tourism Business Improvement District
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer introduced the item. He advised that Choose Folsom is requesting that the item be continued to the second meeting in February. Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking responded to questions from the City Council.

02/10/2026 Item No.1.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 27, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 3

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second Vice Mayor Rohrbough to continue the item to the February 24, 2026 City Council meeting.

Councilmember Aquino, Councilmember Leary, and Mayor Raithel made further comments.

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Rohrbough to continue the public hearing and Resolution No. 11539 to the February 24, 2026 City Council meeting. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Raithel
NOES: Aquino, Leary
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

NEW BUSINESS:

7. Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Historic District Commission City Clerk Christa Freemantle introduced the item.

Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to appoint John Lane to the Historic District Commission to fill the Historic Preservation seat.

Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

8. Resolution No. 11540 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,652,000 for the East Bidwell Pedestrian Overcrossing Project, Project No. PW2605, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Development Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), and Approving the Project’s Inclusion in the CIP, with Project Funding Budgeted at $1,852,000, and Appropriation of Funds
Parks and Recreation Capital Project Manager Ryan Neves made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional information.

Motion by Councilmember Leary, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to approve Resolution No.11540. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

02/10/2026 Item No.1.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 27, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 4

9. Resolution No. 11542 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in the Amount of $1,121,056.62 for the East Bidwell Street Operational Improvements Project, Project No.

PW2603, from a Developer Funding Obligation Outlined in the Development Agreement Adopted by City Council per Ordinance No. 1354 and Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $986,523.48 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and $134,533.14 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276)
Public Works Senior Civil Engineer Zach Bosch made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional information.

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No.11542. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Leary, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer spoke about the Castle Park rebuild project application deadline. He thanked attendees of the recent Neighborhood Park No. 1 meeting and announced that an upcoming meeting is scheduled. He also commended the Police Department for recent arrests related to a traffic stop and a mail theft investigation, and noted the Police Department's upcoming Block Captain meeting.

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Kozlowski spoke about the upcoming State of the City Address and the high school basketball and soccer playoffs, as well as the start of spring sports, including track and field.

Vice Mayor Rohrbough had no comments. She asked about scheduling a future Council workshop regarding City priorities.

Councilmember Leary reminded residents of Natoma Station of an upcoming Landscaping and Lighting meeting. She expressed her condolences to the family and friends of Elinor Steffy.

Councilmember Aquino spoke about the recent Air District meeting she attended, highlighting the district’s investment in the community.

Mayor Raithel thanked Library Director Thom Gruneisen for the invitation to the Lego Challenge. He spoke about working with Assembly Member Josh Hoover on SB79, state legislation from Senator Ashby regarding SB802, and the upcoming State of the City Address.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 8:11 p.m.

SUBMITTED BY:

02/10/2026 Item No.1.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 27, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 5

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Justin Raithel, Mayor

02/10/2026 Item No.1.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

02/10/2026 Item No.1.

File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
January 28, 2026

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Special Meeting

MINUTES

Wednesday, January 28, 2026 11:45 AM

CALL TO ORDER

The special City Council meeting was called to order at 11:58 am with Mayor Raithel presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present:

Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
Justin Raithel, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: None
SPECIAL PRESENTATION:

1. Mayor's 2026 State of the City Address

Mayor Raithel presented the 2026 State of the City Address.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 12:39 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Justin Raithel, Mayor

02/10/2026 Item No.2.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

02/10/2026 Item No.2.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Mayor’s Appointment and Confirmation by the City Council of Planning Commissioner to Serve on the Historic District Commission

FROM: City Clerk's Department

RECOMMENDATION

Staff is requesting that the Mayor, with the consent of the City Council, appoint Amanda Ross to replace Matt Herrera as a Planning Commission representative to the Historic District Commission for the remainder of the term ending in December 2026, as recommended by the Planning Commission.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The terms of all at-large appointments to City of Folsom commissions and committees (except three of the at-large appointments to the Historic District Commission) expire in December of even numbered years. Two members of the Planning Commission are designated by ordinance to serve on the Historic District Commission. Historically the Planning Commission has voted to recommend members of the Planning Commission to serve on the Historic District Commission.

On January 28, 2025, Matt Herrera and Dan West were appointed to serve as the Planning Commission representatives on the Historic District Commission for the term ending in December 2026. Due to time constraints, Matt Herrera has requested to step down from his Historic District Commission seat mid-term and will continue to serve on the Planning Commission only. On January 21, 2026 the Planning Commission made a recommendation for Amanda Ross to fill the seat and serve the remainder of the current term. Dan West will continue to serve the remainder of his term as appointed through the end of December 2026.

Accordingly, staff is bringing forth this nomination for the City Council’s approval.

02/10/2026 Item No.3.
2 POLICY

Folsom Municipal Code Section 17.52.020 establishes the Historic District Commission as a seven-member commission appointed by the Mayor with the consent of the City Council.

Specific seat requirements are set forth as:

A. One representative who is actively involved with historic preservation; B. One representative who is a resident of the historic district; C. One representative who owns a business within the Sutter Street subarea; D. Two planning commissioners;
E. One representative from a historic district business outside the Sutter Street subarea; F. One architect, landscape architect, or other design professional with expertise in historic preservation.

Folsom Municipal Code Section 17.52.040 provides that members of the Historic District Commission are appointed to serve two years.

Respectfully submitted,

Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk

02/10/2026 Item No.3.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11533 – A Resolution Approving the Historic District Commission’s Recommendation for Approval of a Design Review for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project Located at 115 Wool Street and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA Under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines

FROM: Community Development Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Historic District Commission held a public meeting for the project on January 7, 2026. Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actio n confirming the Commission’s decision:

1. Approve Resolution No. 11533 for a Design Review for The Square Rehabilitation Project located at 115 Wool Street.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The applicant is requesting approval for design review to construct a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource, at 115 Wool Street, as discussed in the attached Staff Report.

During the February 4, 2026 Historic District Commission meeting, the Commission modified Conditions 9f to allow a standing seam metal roof to be used for the new Blacksmith Forge Annex building, and Condition 10 providing additional clarification that the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the applicant is operational in nature, does not create an obligation on the City to proceed with the project, and will not have an environmental impact.

The modified conditions of approval are provided in Attachment 2.

POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code (FMC) Section 17.52.300 requires that all new office, industrial, commercial, and residential structures undergo design review by the Historic District Commission.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
2 Per the recent Robert Delp v. City of Folsom et al. decision, the Historic District Commission does not currently have approval authority and all entitlements in the Historic District require final approval by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
Staff have determined that the project complies with the Folsom Municipal Code and the Historic District Design and Development Guidelines, as discussed in the attached staff report.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
As conditioned, the applicant shall be responsible for construction costs associated with the project, and be required to modify or enter into a new agreement with the City regarding use and maintenance.

The costs of construction will not impact the General Fund, however costs associated with maintenance are to be determined by the modified or new agreement between the City and the Folsom Historical Society.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines. Based on staff’s analysis of this project, none of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines apply to the use of the categorical exemptions in this case.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11533 – A Resolution Approving the Historic District Commission’s Recommendation for Approval of a Design Review for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project Located at 115 Wool Street and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA Under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines

2. Revised Conditions of Approval, dated February 4, 2026

3. Draft Historic District Commission Minutes, dated February 4, 2026

4. Historic District Commission Staff Report and Attachments, dated February 4, 2026

Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Attachment 1

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Resolution No. 11533

RESOLUTION NO. 11533

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION’S

RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF A DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE
SQUARE (PIONEER VILLAGE) REHABILITATION PROJECT LOCATED AT 115

WOOL STREET AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15303 (NEW CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES) AND SECTION 15331 (HISTORICAL RESOURCE

RESTORATION/REHABILITATION)

WHEREAS, the Historic District Commission on February 4, 2026, held a public meeting on the proposed design review for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235), reviewed the staff report as well as the associated exhibits and attachments, considered public comment, and provided a recommendation to City Council; and

WHEREAS notice has been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and City Code; and

WHEREAS the Historic District Commission determined that the proposed project would be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 and Section 15331;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby confirms the recommendation of the Historic District Commission and approves a design review for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235).

This approval is subject to the revised conditions of approval included in the staff report presented to the City Council and this Resolution is based on the following findings:

GENERAL FINDINGS

A. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND CITY CODE.

B. THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE OF THE CITY.

CEQA FINDINGS

C. THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15303 (NEW CONSTRUCTION OF CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES ) AND SECTION 15331 (HISTORICAL RESOURCE RESTORATION/REHABILITATION) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

D. THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF SUCCESSIVE PROJECTS OF THE SAME TYPE IN THE SAME PLACE, OVER TIME IS NOT SIGNIFICANT IN THIS CASE.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Resolution No. 11533

E. NO UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST TO DISTINGUISH THE PROPOSED PROJECT FROM OTHERS IN THE EXEMPT CLASS.

F. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE CHANGE IN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A HISTORICAL RESOURCE.

DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS
H. THE PROJECT IS COMPLIANT WITH THE REQUIRED DESIGN STANDARDS OF FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.52.

I. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL.

J. THE BUILDING MATERIALS, TEXTURES AND COLORS USED IN THE PROPOSED

PROJECT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT AND ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL DESIGN THEME OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Attachment 2

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
THE SQUARE (PIONEER VILLAGE) REHABILITATION PROJECT (DRCL25-00235) Cond.

No.

Mitigation
Measure GENERAL REQUIREMENTS When
Required
Responsible
Department

1. The applicant shall submit final site development plans to the Community Development Department that shall substantially conform to the exhibits referenced below, as modified by these conditions of approval:

• Project Narrative (Attachment 5)
• Plan Set (Attachment 6)
• Color and Materials Board (Attachment 7)

This project approval is for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project ( DRCL25- 00235) which includes the construction of a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource , at 115 Wool St. Implementation of the project shall be consistent with the above-referenced items as modified by these conditions of approval.

B CD (P)(E)

2. Building plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval to ensure conformance with this approval and with relevant codes, policies, standards and other requirements of the City of Folsom.

B CD (P)(E)(B)

3. The project approval granted under this staff report shall remain in effect for two years from final date of approval (Expires February 10, 2028). Failure to obtain the relevant building or other permits within this time period, without the subsequent extension of this approval, shall result in the termination of this approval. The owner/applicant may file an application with the Community Develo pment Department for an extension not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date of the approval, along with appropriate fees and necessary submittal materials pursuant to Section 17.52.350 of the Folsom Municipal Code. If after approval of this project, a lawsuit is filed which seeks to invalidate any approval, entitlement, demolition permit, sign permit or other construction permit required in connection with any of the activities or construction authorized by the project approvals, or to enjoin the project contemplated herein, or to challenge the issuance by any governmental agency of any environmental document or exemption determination, the one year period for submitting a complete permit application referenced in FMC section 17.52.350(A) shall be tolled during the time that any litigation is pending, including any appeals.

B CD (P)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

4. The owner/applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, employees, or legislative body concerning the project. The City will promptly notify the owner/applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and will cooperate fully in the defense. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur:
• The City bears its own attorney’s fees and costs; and • The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith.

The owner/applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the owner/applicant.

OG

CD (P)(E)(B)

PW, PR, FD,
PD

DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND FEE REQUIREMENTS

5. The owner/applicant shall pay all applicable taxes, fees and charges at the rate and amount in effect at the time such taxes, fees and charges become due and payable.

B CD(P)(E)

6. If applicable, the owner/applicant shall pay off any existing assessments against the property, or file necessary segregation request and pay applicable fees.

B CD(E)

7. The City, at its sole discretion, may utilize the services of outside legal counsel to assist in the implementation of this project, including, but not limited to, drafting, reviewing and/or revising agreements and/or other documentation for the project. If the City utilizes the services of such outside legal counsel, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all outside legal fees and costs incurred by the City for such services. The applicant may be required, at the sole discretion of the City Attorney, to submit a deposit to the City for these services prior to initiation of the services. The applicant shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for the services regardless of whether a deposit is required.

B CD(P)(E)

8. If the City utilizes the services of consultants to prepare special studies or provide specialized design review or inspection services for the project, the applicant shall reimburse the City for actual costs it incurs in utilizing these services, includin g administrative costs for City personnel. A deposit for these services shall be provided prior to initiating review of the improvement plans, or beginning inspection, whichever is applicable.

B CD(P)(E)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

9. The project shall comply with the following architecture and design requirements:

a) The design, materials, and colors of the proposed The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) shall be consistent with Attachments 5, 6, and 7 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

b) Building Permits shall be required.

c) The project shall adhere to the standards, guidelines, and recommendations of the most recent version of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for Rehabilitation.

d) Repairs to the Ashland Station building shall, whenever feasible, maintain and reuse the existing wood material. Repairs may include limited replacement, which shall be limited to only damaged components; new materials shall be in-kind and/or historically compatible that match the existing materials in terms of composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repairs shall be performed using recognized conservation methods.

e) The proposed deck for Ashland Station shall be freestanding with no physical connection to the Ashland Station building. The footings for the deck support posts shall be designed so that there are minimal impacts to the existing footings/foundation of Ashland Station, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

f) The roof of the Blacksmith Forge Annex shall be wood shingles standing seam metal that uses a similar color used for the roof the Roundhouse Building located at 824 Sutter Street, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. (This condition was modified at the 2-4-26 Historic District Commission Meeting).

All Conditions of Approval as outlined herein shall be made as a note or separate sheet on the Construction Drawings.

OG CD (P)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

10. Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy is contingent upon the Folsom Historical Society entering into a new agreement with the City or an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Understanding, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for operation and maintenance of The Square (also known as Pioneer Village).

Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy is contingent upon the Folsom Historical Society entering into a new agreement with the City or an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for operation and maintenance of The Square (also known as Pioneer Village). Any MOU entered into between the City and the applicant related to the Square will be operational in nature, will not create any obligation on the City to proceed with the project, will not affect the City’s total discretion to make environmental review determinations related to the project, and the MOU will not otherwise result in an impact on the environment. (This condition was modified at the 2-4-26 Historic District Commission Meeting).

O CD (P), PR

11. A professional report shall be prepared by the applicant that details the current conditions of Ashland Station, specifies what components are proposed to be repaired, and details the proposed repair treatment in accordance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for Rehabilitation. This report shall be provided to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for all work related to Ashland Station.

B CD(P)

12. If the Community Development Department determines that an experienced historic preservation construction monitor is necessary to ensure the rehabilit ation and restoration work for the Ashland Station complies with the Rehabilitation Standards in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties , the City shall retain the services of such a monitor at the applicant’s expense.

DC CD(P)

13. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with this project for construction and rehabilitation.

DC CD(P)

NOISE REQUIREMENT

14. Compliance with the City of Folsom Noise Control Ordinance, General Plan Safety & Noise Element and Standard Construction Specifications and Details Section 7.23 is required.

Hours of construction operation shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays

I, B CD (P)(E)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays. Request to work during days and times not permitted under these regulations may only occur with written permission from the City of Folsom Community Development Director or duly authorized deputy.

RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT

WHEN REQUIRED
CD
(P)
(E)
(B)
(F)
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Engineering Division
Building Division
Fire Division
I Prior to approval of Improvement Plans
M Prior to approval of Final Map
B Prior to issuance of first Building Permit
O Prior to approval of Occupancy Permit
G Prior to issuance of Grading Permit
PW Public Works Department DC During construction
PR Park and Recreation Department OG On-going requirement PD Police Department

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Attachment 3

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
February 4, 2026

HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES
February 4, 2026
6:30 p.m.
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, California 95630

CALL TO ORDER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION:

A regular meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order at 6:34 p.m. with Chair Kathy Cole presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Commissioners Present: Mathew Herrera, Commissioner
John Felts, Commissioner
Jennifer Cabrera, Chair
Lisa Gomez, Commissioner
John Lane, Commissioner
Kathy Cole, Vice Chair

Commissioners Absent: Dan West, Commissioner

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

CITIZEN COMMUNICATION:

NONE

OATH OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED TO COMMISSIONERS

Oath of Office was administered to Kathy Cole, John Lane and Lisa Gomez.

COMMENDATION HONORING MARK DASCALLOS FOR HIS DISTINGUISHED SERVICE ON THE HISTORIC

DISTRICT COMMISSION

ELECTION OF CHAIR

A unanimous vote by the Commission was called to elect Jennifer Cabrera as Chair of the Historic District Commission.

ELECTION OF VICE CHAIR

A unanimous vote by the Commission was called to elect Kathy Cole as Vice Chair of the Historic District Commission.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
February 4, 2026

MINUTES:

The minutes of December 3, 2025, meeting were approved as submitted.

NEW BUSINESS:

1. DRCL25-00235: The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation)

A Public Hearing to request Design Review for a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource, located in The Square (also known as Pioneer Village) at 115 Wool St. The project site is within the Historic District (HD) Zoning District within the Sutter Street Subarea of the Historic District, and the General Plan land-use designation of the project site is Historic Folsom Mixed-Use (HF). The project is categorically exempt under 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (Project Planner: Nathan Stroud / Applicant: Folsom Historical Society)

COMMISSIONER LANE MOVED RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION (DRCL25 -00235) FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 420 SQUARE -FOOT NEW BLACKSMITH FORGE ANNEX BUILDING AND EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS TO ASHLAND STATION, AN ELIGIBLE HISTORIC RESOURCE, AT 115 WOOL

STREET, BASED ON THE (FINDINGS A-H), AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT (CONDITIONS 1-14) WITH MODIFICATION TO CONDITION 9F TO ALLOW STANDING SEAM

ROOF WITH A COLOR THAT MATCHES THE ROUNDHOUSE BUILDING AND WITH THE MODIFICATION TO CONDITION 10 AS NOTED IN THE GREEN SHEET.

Correction to Condition 10

The correction to Condition 10 shown below is to provide additional language to provide greater clarification regarding the nature of the memorandum of understanding, however this would not substantively change the timing or requirements of this condition:

Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy is contingent upon the Folsom Historical Society entering into a new agreement with the City or an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Understanding, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for operation and maintenance of The Square (also known as Pioneer Village).

Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy is contingent upon the Folsom Historical Society entering into a new agreement with the City or an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for operation and maintenance of The Square (also known as Pioneer Village). Any MOU entered into between the City and the applicant related to the Square will be operational in nature, will not create any obligation on the City to proceed with the project, will not affect the City’s total discretion to make environmental review determinations related to the project, and the MOU will not otherwise result in an impact on the environment.

COMMISSIONER HERRERA SECONDED THE MOTION.

The Motion carried the following roll call vote:

AYES: HERRERA, FELTS, CABRERA, GOMEZ, LANE, COLE
NOES: NONE

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
February 4, 2026

RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: WEST

MOTION PASSED

PLANNING MANAGER REPORT:

Planning Manager, Desmond Parrington, provided an update on the following items:

• The 603 Sutter Street Project, the applicant submitted a request to withdraw that was approved by the City Council. The project will not be moving forward.
• The next Historic District Commission regular meeting will be held on March 4, 2026. There will be one item that will address the changes to our ADU ordinance.
• There is an update on sign enforcement. The Community Development Department met with the Historic District on January 14, 2026 to discuss the changes to the sign regulation. • Kathy Cole, as a member of the California Preservation Foundation has been working closing with Staff and the Mayor onchanges we are hoping to get to SB 79.
• We are still working on AB 1061

STAFF LEVEL APPROVED DESIGN REVIEWS

• One project approved at staff level for a detached ADU located at 291 Leidesdorff Street. The Design Review is located on City the website

There being no further business to come before the Folsom Historic District Commission, Chair Jennifer Cabrera adjourned the meeting at 7:33 p.m.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

________________________________________________
Karen Sanabria, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SPECIALIST

APPROVED:

________________________________________________
Jennifer Cabrera, CHAIR

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Attachment 4

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
Type: Public Meeting
February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 1
Historic District Commission Staff Report
50 Natoma Street, Council Chambers
Folsom, CA 95630
Project Name: The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) File #: DRCL25-00235
Request: Design Review, Commission Level
Location: 115 Wool St. Folsom, CA 95630
Parcel(s): APN 070-0052-023-0000
Staff Contact: Nathan Stroud, Associate Planner
[email protected], (916) 461-6220

Property Owner Applicant
City of Folsom Folsom Historical Society
50 Natoma Street Attn: Jeremy Bernau
Folsom, CA 95630 823 Sutter Street
Folsom, CA 95630

Project Summary
The proposed project involves Design Review for a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource, located at 115 Wool Street. The subject property is in the Historic District (HD) Zoning District within the Sutter Street Subarea of the Historic District , with a General Plan land- use designation of Historic Folsom Mixed-Use (HF). The City Council will take final action.

Staff have determined that the project complies with the standards provided in the Folsom Municipal Code and the Historic District Design and Development Guidelines and recommends approval of the project as conditioned.

Policy/Rule
Folsom Municipal Code (FMC) Section 17.52.300 states that the Historic District Commission shall have final authority relating to the design and architecture of all exterior renovations, remodeling, modification, addition, or demolition of existing structures within the Historic Dis trict. FMC Section 17.52.330 states that, in reviewing projects, the Commission shall consider the following criteria:
a) Project compliance with the General Plan and any applicable zoning ordinances; b) Conformance with any city -wide design guidelines and historic district design and development guidelines adopted by the city council;

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
Type: Public Meeting
February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 2
c) Conformance with any project -specific design standards approved through the planned development permit process or similar review process; and d) Compatibility of building materials, textures and colors with surrounding development and consistency with the general design theme of the neighborhood.

However, as a result of the recent Robert Delp v. City of Folsom et al. decision, the Historic District Commission does not currently have approval authority and all entitlements in the Historic District require final approval by the City Council.

Recommendation
Conduct a public meeting and upon conclusion confirm staff’s determination that the project is exempt from CEQA and recommend approval of an application (DRCL25-00235) for design review for a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource , at 115 Wool Street, based on the Findings below (Findings A-H), and subject to the conditions of approval attached to this report (Conditions 1-14).

Table of Contents
1 – Project Site Information
2 – Description/Analysis
3 – Proposed Conditions of Approval
4 – Vicinity Map
5 – Project Narrative
6 – Plan Set
7 – Color and Materials Board
8 – Historic Photos
9 – Site Photos
10 – HPL Comments Letter, 11/4/25
11 – Applicant Response to HPL Comments Letter

Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1

PROJECT SITE INFORMATION
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Historic Folsom Mixed-Use (HF)

ZONING Historic District (HD) within the Sutter Street
Subarea of the Historic District

ADJACENT LAND USES/ZONING North: Folsom Depot (SUT/HD) South: Commercial Uses (SUT/HD)
East: Commercial Uses (SUT/HD)
West: Commercial Uses (SUT/HD)

SITE CHARACTERISTICS The project site contains a historic interpretation area (The Square aka Pioneer Village) on the
northeast portion of a 192,100-square-foot
(4.41-acre) parcel.

APPLICABLE CODES FMC Chapter 17.52, HD, Historic District FMC Section 17.52.300, Design Review
FMC Section 17.52.5 10, Sutter Street Subarea
Special Use and Design Standards
Historic District Design and Development
Guidelines (DDG’s)

PUBLIC NOTICING A notice was posted on the project site five days prior to the Historic District Commission and City
Council Meetings that met the requirements of
FMC Section 17.52.320.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 4
ATTACHMENT 2

DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
Applicant’s Proposal
The applicant, Jeremy Bernau on behalf of the Folsom Histor ical Society, is requesting Design Review approval for a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource, at 115 Wool Street.

The new Blacksmith Forge Annex is intended to provide additional storage and additional outdoor space for blacksmith demonstrations and classes, and is proposed to be similar in materials to the existing Ashland Station building.

The modifications to Ashland Station include removal of an existing non-original door and roof cover on the structure, reopening of an original entrance, reuse and repair of an existing large wooden cargo door, and adding a new deck in front of the structure for access. Damaged components of the existing materials for the existing wooden cargo door is proposed to be replaced with like -for-like, historically compatible materials.

Overall, the intent is to rehabilitate the structure in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

Ashland Station is not a listed historic resource on the national, state, or local historic registers; however, the building is potentially eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources based on feedback provided by the State Historic Resources Commission.

General Plan and Zoning Consistency
The project site is within the Historic District (HD) within the Sutter Street Subarea of the Historic District, and the General Plan land -use designation of the project site is Historic Folsom Mixed-Use (HF).

The following table shows applicable General Plan goals/policies:

General Plan Policies (2035)
Goals/Policies Description
LU 1.1.9
(Preserve Historic
Resources)
Recognize the importance of history in the City of Folsom, and preserve historic and cultural resources throughout the city, to the extent feasible.

LU 2.1.1
(Historic Folsom)
Maintain the existing street fabric and pattern and enhance the tourist-oriented, historic commercial uses in the Historic Folsom commercial areas to preserve the unique character of Folsom’s historic center and support local business.

NCR 5.1
(Cultural Resources)
Encourage the preservation, restoration, and maintenance of cultural resources, including buildings and sites, to enrich our sense of place and our appreciation of the city’s history.

The project involves the modification of a potentially eligible historic resource (known as Ashland Station) , which was relocated from its original location to The Square (also known as Pioneer Village) in 1973. The project is intended to partially rehabilitate the

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 5
structure to its original exterior appearance through the removal of a non -original entrance, and the restoration of an original entrance to the structure. The rehabilitation work is considered consistent with General Plan Goal NRC 5.1 and General Plan Policy

1.1.9. Furthermore, the construction of the Blacksmith Forge Annex for historic interpretive demonstrations is also consistent with General Plan Policies LU 1.1.9 and LR

2.1.1. The following table shows how the proposed Blacksmith Forge Annex relates to the applicable development standards:

Sutter Street Subarea Development Standards
(FMC 17.52.510)
Required Proposed
Setbacks No Setbacks Required 6 Foot Setback from nearest Property Line Height Maximum 35 Feet ~16.4 Feet

The following table shows how the proposed Ashland Station front deck relates to the applicable development standards:

Sutter Street Subarea Development Standards
(FMC 17.52.510)
Required Proposed
Setbacks No Setbacks Required 34 Foot Setback from nearest Property Line

The project has been determined to satisfy the applicable development standards of the Sutter Street Subarea outlined in the Folsom Municipal Code.

Building Design and Architecture
Blacksmith Forge Annex
The proposed project is subject to compliance with FMC 17.52.510 and the Historic District Design and Development Guidelines ( DDGs). FMC 17.52.510(B) and Section

5.02.01(a) of the DDGs establishes the design concepts for the Sutter Street Subarea, which states that new structures should be of a pre-1900s design. The Building Materials Palette, which is Attachment 2 of Appendix D of the DDGs, also provides a list of what materials are considered appropriate or inappropriate for the project. The Building Materials Palette allows for the use of wood board -and-batten siding, wood shingle roof, and corrugated metal woof for accessory structures.

The proposed Blacksmith Forge Annex (approx. 420 square-feet) is intended to be similar to the colors and materials of the Ashland Station building, including the use of a corrugated metal roof, and stained cedar board-and-batten wood siding . The structure also includes a vented cupola, painted black to match the hardware of the existing blacksmith workshop adjacent to the proposed new annex. The corrugated metal roof is proposed to match Ashland Station; however, the corrugated roof at Ashland Station is not original, as the structure was originally shingled. After discussions with the applicant, the applicant has agreed to use a wooden shingle roof instead, which is reflected as a requirement in Condition 9f.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 6
Based on staff’s review of the project , as conditioned , the proposed Blacksmith Forge Annex has been determined to be consistent with the Building Materials Palette of the DDGs, and with the pre-1900s design concept for the Sutter Street Subarea due to being similar to the original Ashland Station structure (c. early 1860s) in design.

Ashland Station Rehabilitation
The Historic Commercial Design Criteria of Appendix D of the DDGs state that for restorations, restoration work shall not destroy distinguishing qualities or character of the structure and its environment . Furthermore, deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced wherever possible , and in the event that replacement is necessary, the new material shall match in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. The criteria also states that replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of original features, substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence. These guidelines align with the rehabilitation standards of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

The project proposes to restore the structure to a more original appearance while making some modifications to address egress requirements. This includes the removal of non - original elements (a door and cover), repairing and reusing the original existing wooden cargo door, modifying the cargo door from a hinged (i.e., swing) to a slide operation for egress as required by the Building Code, constructing a deck for access, and constructing French doors behind the cargo doors. Furthermore, damaged portions of the existing cargo door is proposed to be repaired with in -kind, historically compatible materials to address existing rot and termite damage. The non -original entrance will also be closed using historically compatible materials.

The existing entrance door and cover on the corner of the west elevation of the structure, shown in Attachment 9, was installed in 2021 and is not original to the structure itself, as shown in historic photos of the structure provided in Attachment 8. Based on the same historic photo evidence, the large wooden cargo door in the center of the west elevation has been confirmed as an original entrance to the structure. The project would be restoring the structure to a more original appearance.

Based on staff’s review of the scope of work, staff consider the restoration and repair work consistent with the Historic Commercial Design Criteria of the DDGs, and has determined that the project will not destroy distinguishing qualities or the character of the structure or its environment. A more detailed analysis is provided in the subsequent section below in review of the project ’s compliance with the standards for rehabilitation under the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties – Rehabilitation Standards
“Rehabilitation” is among one of the four treatments outlined in the Secretary if the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (SOI Standards) , and is defined as the ”act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions of features which convey

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 7
its historical, cultural, or architectural values.” Of the four treatments, rehabilitation allows for alterations and construction of new additions to an existing structure, if necessary for the continued or new use of a historic building , as long as the features essential to the building’s historic character are retained. There are ten standards for rehabilitation, which are listed in the table below:

Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties # Rehabilitation Standards

1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships.

2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided.

3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.

4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved.

5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.

6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.

7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.

8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

In identifying the defining features that contribute to the historic character of Ashland Station, staff have reviewed the 2012 Annual Report by the State Historical Resources Commission which reviewed the nomination of Ashland Station (referred to as Ashland Depot) for listing as a historic resource. The report highlighted Ashland Station as an example of 1860s vernacular railroad architecture that includes post and beam framing, board and batten siding, double -hung wooden sash windows, and large wooden cargo doors. Vernacular architecture is marked by the use of locally available materials and traditional methods of construction . Typically, vernacular styles have regional variation depending on the skills and materials of the locality , and can be minimally decorated or of a simple design. The features noted previously are the defining features of this particular structure’s vernacular style.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 8
The applicant has provided a Project Narrative in Attachment 5 detailing compliance with the SOI Standards for Rehabilitation, and staff have provided Condition 9c requiring that the project adhere to the most recent version of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for Rehabilitation. Furthermore, Condition 11 requires the applicant to submit a professional report documenting the existing conditions of Ashland Station, identifying the specific components proposed for repair and the proposed treatment methods in order to verify compliance with the SOI Standards prior to commencement of the rehabilitation work . Although not anticipated to be necessary, Condition 12 allows the City to retain the services of a Historic Preservation monitor, should it be deemed necessary, to ensure that the rehabilitation work adheres to the SOI Standards.

Staff’s own assessment of the project’s compliance is noted in the s ubsequent sections of this report.

Protection, Maintenance, and Repair of Historic Materials and Features The SOI Standards generally seek the least degree of intervention possible, which prioritizes protection and maintenance of defining historic features whenever feasible. If it is not feasible due to extensive deterioration of the material, repair is allowed that includes the limited replacement with in-kind or historically compatible substitute material.

Based on the project narrative, the project proposes to reuse the existing wooden cargo door to the extent feasible, making repairs as needed to sections damaged by rot and termite damage. Repairs are proposed to be performed using in -kind, historically compatible wood material . Furthermore, removal of the non -original entrance door will also utilize historically compatible wood material to close the opening.

Staff have added Condition 9d to ensure that the project adheres to the proposed repair work consistent with the SOI Standards, requiring that replacement be limited to only damaged components, and that the work use in-kind or historically compatible materials that match existing materials in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities.

Alterations and Code-Required Work (Accessibility and Life Safety) The SOI Standards for Rehabilitation allow for some exterior and interior alterations which are needed as part of the building’s continued use, including to meet accessibility and life-safety requirements. Alterations should not radically change, obscure, or destroy character-defining spaces, materials, features, or finishes. New additions should also be constructed in such a manner that they can be removed in the future without impairing the integrity of the historic property.

The project propose s to add a new deck in front of Ashland Station to allow for access through the restored cargo door, and a new French door entrance behind the cargo door.

Additionally, the existing cargo doors, which have a hinged (i.e., swing) operation are proposed to be altered to a slide operation for purposes of meeting egress requirements.

The deck and the French doors are proposed to be constructed so as to allow for their removal, with t he deck proposed to be a freestanding structure with no physical

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 9
connection to the Ashland Station building. Both additions are intended to be visually subordinate to the building, with the French doors being screened behind the original repaired cargo doors and the deck being constructed so as to be clearly identifiable as contemporary work in order to not create a false sense of the structure’s history. The modification of the cargo doors from a hinged to a slide operation is necessary to meet egress requirements under the California Building Code, and will not drastically alter the visual appearance of the structure due to reusing the existing cargo doors.

Conclusion
Overall, staff have determined that the project is consistent with the standards for rehabilitation outlined in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, and have placed conditions to ensure adherence to these standards and best practices.

Use and Maintenance, and Related Projects
The Square (also known as Pioneer Village) is currently owned by the City of Folsom, but operated by the Folsom Historical Society. In order to construct an additional structure on City property and make modifications to Ashland Station, the Folsom Historical Society will need to either modify their agreement with the City or enter into a new agreement with the City prior to construction for use and maintenance of the property. Staff have provided Condition 10 reflecting this requirement. Additionally, Condition 13 has been provided specifying that the applicant is responsible for all costs associated with this project for construction and rehabilitation.

Environmental Review
The project is categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) for the construction of the proposed Blacksmith Forge Annex, and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) for the rehabilitation of Ashland Station . Based on staff’s analysis of this project, none of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines apply to the use of the categorical exemption in this case.

As a part of the analysis for this project, staff closely reviewed CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(f), which states that categorical exemptions shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. As relevant to this project, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 includes resources determined by the State Historical Resources Commission to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources as a historic resource.

In order for the Ashland Station rehabilitation work to be considered exempt under Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines, the work would need to be performed in a manner consistent with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties . Staff have reviewed the project against the standards for rehabilitation in the previous sections of this report, and have placed requirements for adherence to the rehabilitation standards. As such, staff have determined that the Ashland Station rehabilitation work will be performed in accordance

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 10
with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and thus qualifies for exemption under Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Public Comments
The Heritage Preservation League (HPL) prepared a comments letter, provided in Attachment 10, which provided feedback on the project . After preparation of the letter, HPL met with the applicant to discuss the project to address any questions or concerns.

The applicant provided responses to the HPL comments letter, which are provided in Attachment 11. After meeting with the applicant, HPL has stated in an email that they are “satisfied that all aspects of the proposed project will enhance the interpretive area of Folsom’s Railroad Block and that the rehabilitation of Ashland Station can be completed in compliance with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards”.

Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the proposed project, subject to the attached conditions of approval.

Historic District Commission Action
Move to recommend approval of an application (DRCL25-00235) for design review for a 420 square -foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource, at 115 Wool Street, based on the (Findings A-H), and subject to the conditions of approval attached to this report (Conditions 1-14).

GENERAL FINDINGS
A. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND CITY CODE.

B. THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY.

CEQA FINDINGS
C. THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER 15303 (NEW CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES) AND 15331 (HISTORICAL RESOURCE

RESTORATION/REHABILITATION) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES.

D. THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF SUCCESSIVE PROJECTS OF THE SAME TYPE IN THE SAME PLACE, OVER TIME IS NOT SIGNIFICANT IN THIS CASE.

E. NO UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST TO DISTINGUISH THE PROPOSED PROJECT FROM OTHERS IN THE EXEMPT CLASS.

F. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

City of Folsom Page 11
CHANGE IN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A HISTORICAL RESOURCE.

DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS
G. THE BUILDING MATERIALS, TEXTURES AND COLORS USED IN THE

PROPOSED PROJECT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING

DEVELOPMENT AND ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL DESIGN THEME OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

H. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE HISTORIC

DISTRICT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 3
Proposed Conditions of Approval

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
THE SQUARE (PIONEER VILLAGE) REHABILITATION PROJECT (DRCL25-00235) Cond.

No.

Mitigation
Measure GENERAL REQUIREMENTS When
Required
Responsible
Department

1. The applicant shall submit final site development plans to the Community Development Department that shall substantially conform to the exhibits referenced below, as modified by these conditions of approval:
• Project Narrative (Attachment 5)
• Plan Set (Attachment 6)
• Color and Materials Board (Attachment 7)
This project approval is for The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25- 00235) which includes the construction of a 420 square-foot new Blacksmith Forge Annex building and exterior modifications to Ashland Station, an eligible historic resource, at 115 Wool St. Implementation of the project shall be consistent with the above-referenced items as modified by these conditions of approval.

B CD (P)(E)

2. Building plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval to ensure conformance with this approval and with relevant codes, policies, standards and other requirements of the City of Folsom.

B CD (P)(E)(B)

3. The project approval granted under this staff report shall remain in effect for two years from final date of approval (Expires February 10, 2028). Failure to obtain the relevant building or other permits within this time period, without the subsequent extension of this approval, shall result in the termination of this approval. The owner/applicant may file an application with the Community Development Department for an extension not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date of the approval, along with appropriate fees and necessary submittal materials pursuant to Section 17.52.350 of the Folsom Municipal Code. If after approval of this project, a lawsuit is filed which seeks to invalidate any approval, entitlement, demolition permit, sign permit or other construction permit required in connection with any of the activities or construction authorized by the project approvals, or to enjoin the project contemplated herein, or to challenge the issuance by any governmental agency of any environmental document or exemption determination, the one year period for submitting a complete permit application referenced in FMC section 17.52.350(A) shall be tolled during the time that any litigation is pending, including any appeals.

B CD (P)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

4. The owner/applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, employees, or legislative body concerning the project. The City will promptly notify the owner/applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and will cooperate fully in the defense. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur:
• The City bears its own attorney’s fees and costs; and • The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith.

The owner/applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the owner/applicant.

OG

CD (P)(E)(B)

PW, PR, FD,
PD

DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND FEE REQUIREMENTS

5. The owner/applicant shall pay all applicable taxes, fees and charges at the rate and amount in effect at the time such taxes, fees and charges become due and payable.

B CD(P)(E)

6. If applicable, the owner/applicant shall pay off any existing assessments against the property, or file necessary segregation request and pay applicable fees.

B CD(E)

7. The City, at its sole discretion, may utilize the services of outside legal counsel to assist in the implementation of this project, including, but not limited to, drafting, reviewing and/or revising agreements and/or other documentation for the project. If the City utilizes the services of such outside legal counsel, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all outside legal fees and costs incurred by the City for such services. The applicant may be required, at the sole discretion of the City Attorney, to submit a deposit to the City for these services prior to initiation of the services. The applicant shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for the services regardless of whether a deposit is required.

B CD(P)(E)

8. If the City utilizes the services of consultants to prepare special studies or provide specialized design review or inspection services for the project, the applicant shall reimburse the City for actual costs it incurs in utilizing these services, including administrative costs for City personnel. A deposit for these services shall be provided prior to initiating review of the improvement plans, or beginning inspection, whichever is applicable.

B CD(P)(E)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

9. The project shall comply with the following architecture and design requirements:
a) The design, materials, and colors of the proposed The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) shall be consistent with Attachments 5, 6, and 7 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. b) Building Permits shall be required.
c) The project shall adhere to the standards, guidelines, and recommendations of the most recent version of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for Rehabilitation.
d) Repairs to the Ashland Station building shall, whenever feasible, maintain and reuse the existing wood material. Repairs may include limited replacement, which shall be limited to only damaged components; new materials shall be in-kind and/or historically compatible that match the existing materials in terms of composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repairs shall be performed using recognized conservation methods.
e) The proposed deck for Ashland Station shall be freestanding with no physical connection to the Ashland Station building. The footings for the deck support posts shall be designed so that there are minimal impacts to the existing footings/foundation of Ashland Station, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.
f) The roof of the Blacksmith Forge Annex shall be wood shingles, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

All Conditions of Approval as outlined herein shall be made as a note or separate sheet on the Construction Drawings.

OG CD (P)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

10. Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy is contingent upon the Folsom Historical Society entering into a new agreement with the City or an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Understanding, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for operation and maintenance of The Square (also known as Pioneer Village).

O CD (P), PR

11. A professional report shall be prepared by the applicant that details the current conditions of Ashland Station, specifies what components are proposed to be repaired, and details the proposed repair treatment in accordance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for Rehabilitation. This report shall be provided to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for all work related to Ashland Station.

B CD(P)

12. If the Community Development Department determines that an experienced historic preservation construction monitor is necessary to ensure the rehabilitation and restoration work for the Ashland Station complies with the Rehabilitation Standards in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties , the City shall retain the services of such a monitor at the applicant’s expense.

DC CD(P)

13. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with this project for construction and rehabilitation.

DC CD(P)

NOISE REQUIREMENT

14. Compliance with the City of Folsom Noise Control Ordinance, General Plan Safety & Noise Element and Standard Construction Specifications and Details Section 7.23 is required.

Hours of construction operation shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays. Request to work during days and times not permitted under these regulations may only occur with written permission from the City of Folsom Community Development Director or duly authorized deputy.

I, B CD (P)(E)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT WHEN REQUIRED
I Prior to approval of Improvement Plans
M Prior to approval of Final Map
B Prior to issuance of first Building Permit
O Prior to approval of Occupancy Permit
CD
(P)
(E)
(B)
(F)
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Engineering Division
Building Division
Fire Division
G Prior to issuance of Grading Permit
PW Public Works Department DC During construction
PR Park and Recreation Department OG On-going requirement PD Police Department

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 4
Vicinity Map

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 5
Project Narrative

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

1 Ashland Station Project Narrative
Overview
This report explains the proposed alterations to the existing building known as Ashland Station, located at 196 Wool Street, and its compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the treatment of Historic Properties (SOI Standards) under Rehabilitation. Because the project follows these Standards, it is consistent with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which allow a project in conformance with the SOI Standards to be presumed to have a less-than-significant impact on historical resources. Accordingly, the project qualifies for a Class 31 categorical exemption under CEQA.

Existing Conditions
The building is a single-story, wood-frame structure with barn-style design elements. It is located within The Square, an outdoor interpretive area situated in Folsom’s historic railroad block. The building appears on the City of Folsom’s preliminary inventory of potentially eligible historic resources; however, no formal designation has been adopted to date.

Proposed Project Summary
The project involves the rehabilitation of Ashland Station while addressing life-safety and functional requirements. The existing barn doors will be repaired using like-kind, historically compatible materials, addressing minor rot and termite damage through in-place preservation treatments. To meet egress requirements, the barn doors will be converted to a sliding operation; this change will retain the doors’ original outward appearance and will not be perceptible from the exterior. A non-original door installed in 2021 will be removed, and the opening will be restored using historically compatible materials to maintain the building’s character. All interventions are designed to protect the building’s defining features while accommodating functional and code requirements.

Three panel true divided lite Fr. doors will be installed behind the barn doors. This addition is designed to be fully reversible, visually subordinate to the historic form, and screened from primary public views, ensuring minimal impact on the building’s historic integrity. A 13’ x 10’ deck or dock will also be added, carefully designed to be reversible and visually subordinate,

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

2 preserving the original character of the structure. Photographic documentation and other historical evidence have guided the design of all interventions to ensure that character-defining features are preserved and that all new work is compatible with the historic building.

SOI Standards for Rehabilitation Compliance
Since the 1970s, Ashland Station has functioned as an interpretive site. The proposed rehabilitation enhances this use by accommodating improved access and functionality while ensuring that the building’s distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships are minimally altered. Required interventions, including the new door, balcony, and stairs, are designed to be reversible and visually subordinate, maintaining compatibility with the historic form.

The building’s distinctive materials, features, and spatial relationships will be retained. No defining characteristics will be removed or obscured. Interventions for code compliance, such as the new door, balcony, and stairs, are designed to have minimal visual impact while preserving the building’s historic character. No elements will be altered to create a false sense of history.

Modern interventions will be clearly distinguishable from the historic fabric and easily removable, ensuring the physical record of the building’s evolution remains legible. Non-original features with no historic value, such as the 2021 door, will be removed. Earlier historic fabric will be repaired or replaced in-kind using materials that are compatible with the original, while modern additions will be identifiable as contemporary work.

Character-defining features, including the barn doors, siding, trim, and other exterior materials, will be repaired rather than replaced whenever possible, maintaining the building’s original appearance and historic integrity. Where deterioration exists (e.g., minor rot or insect damage), materials will be repaired using methods and materials that match the original in composition, texture, and appearance, preserving historic fabric whenever feasible.

No abrasive, destructive, or inappropriate treatments are proposed. All preservation work will follow recognized best practices for wood conservation and material care. No subsurface

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

3 excavation is proposed that would affect known or suspected archaeological resources, ensuring compliance with preservation requirements.

The deck or dock addition are differentiated from the historic structure in a way that does not diminish or obscure the building’s original form, scale, or primary views. They are visually subordinate, compatible, and fully reversible. All new work, including the deck or dock and Fr. doors are designed to be fully removable without damaging historic materials, ensuring that future restoration or changes can be made without compromising the building’s historic integrity.

Therefore, all proposed work meets the standards outlined by the SOI for Rehabilitation.

CEQA Compliance and Regulatory Justification
Ashland Station, located at 196 Wool Street, is being considered a historic resource at the discretion of the City of Folsom’s Planning Department in accordance with §21084.1 of the Public Resources Code. It is included on the City’s preliminary list of cultural resources, and it is anticipated that it will be listed on the official City of Folsom Cultural Resources Inventory in the future. Therefore, this project has been designed to treat the building as a presumptive historic resource (Valley Advocates v. City of Fresno, 2008).

The proposed project restores character-defining features and preserves the building’s historic integrity in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (SOI Standards). The work avoids substantial alteration of character-defining features and is therefore consistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(c), which generally considers a project conforming to the SOI Standards to have a less-than-significant impact on historical resources. Conformance also supports a presumption of less-than-significant impact under §15064.5(b)(3). Photographic documentation and historical evidence have been used to guide restoration decisions, demonstrating that the proposed work preserves the building’s defining features and historic integrity.

Although historic resources are generally not categorically exempt under §15300.2(c), this project qualifies for a Class 31 categorical exemption under CEQA §15331 because it involves the restoration and preservation of an existing historic structure, with alterations limited to repair

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

4 and maintenance that maintain the building’s original character. All work is fully reversible, visually subordinate, and supported by documentation, ensuring that the project meets the exemption criteria.

Conclusion
The proposed project complies with all applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. It has been carefully designed to preserve the existing building’s architectural integrity, guided by photographic and historical documentation, and any new features are visually and physically reversible. The project will not materially impair any historic characteristics and is consistent with CEQA Guidelines as a preservation-sensitive rehabilitation project. Therefore, the project should be given a Class 31 categorical exemption under CEQA.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Mr. Nathan Stroud
City of Folsom
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
RE: Ashland Station
Nathan,
Please find below the questions and answers to your questions regarding the proposed French doors at Ashland Station.

1. Proposed New Blacksmith Forge Annex
The corrugated metal roof on Ashland Station is not original to the structure and originally use to be shingles. The proposed Blacksmith Forge Annex is proposed to utilize a corrugated metal roof to match the non-original roof of Ashland Station.

Folsom History will agree to use fire retardant wood shingles rather than the proposed metal roof.

2. Ashland Station Rehabilitation-Revised Project Narrative Please see answers to questions in 4. below.

3. Ashland Station Rehabilitation-SOI Standards of Compliance Folsom History will prepare a report that details the current conditions of Ashland Station, specifies what components are proposed to be repaired and details the proposed repair treatment in accordance with Secretary of the Interior Standards for the treatment of historic properties for rehabilitation. This report shall be provided to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for all work related to Ashland Station.

If the Community Development Department determines a construction monitor is necessary, Folsom History will provide a monitor with the knowledge of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the treatment of historic properties.

4. Ashland Station Rehabilitation-Proposed French Doors

1. Would you be able to explain more about why the construction of the French door is necessary instead of utilizing the existing hinged barn doors? The existing barn doors would need to be substantially strengthened and modified to support frequent use and the installation of the necessary hardware to meet egress requirements. Simply hanging the doors on barn door hardware and sliding them out of the way would better preserve the existing barn doors.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

The French door 3-panel unit would simply be screwed into the existing opening with no need for additional modification and the unit would be designed to accommodate hardware to meet egress requirements. To return to the original configuration, the French door unit could simply be unscrewed from the opening and the sliding barn door hardware changed back to the original hinges.

2. Would you explain more about the fall hazards, weather and road noise issues that necessitate the doors?
Currently, without the proposed deck, the barn doors open out, and visitors could fall to the ground. With the proposed deck, since the barn doors are solid offering no visibility and swing out, the barn doors could hit and potentially injure visitors standing on the deck when opened.

Since the barn door opening is large and faces southwest, the weather, road noise and noise from events in the plaza and amphitheater can impact programs held inside Ashland Station. Since only the center French door is active in the 3-panel unit, the weather and noise impacts are cut by 2/3rds. The French door unit is weather tight and sealed unlike the existing barn doors.

The outswing barn doors also limit the usability of a large portion of the proposed deck.

3. Why were alternative options infeasible?
While the current installation of the single door with panic hardware is a viable option to address required egress, sound and weather impacts, it added a new opening requiring modification to the wall and detracts from the historical integrity of Ashland Station.

Removing the single door and modifications will return access to the original opening, preserve the existing doors and still offer the required egress while limiting the weather and noise impacts to programs in Ashland Station.

Using the historical opening and simply screwing a 3-panel French door specifically built to fit into the existing opening, provides the lightest touch to address the weather, noise and required egress requirements. In addition, from the exterior, the look of the barn doors is the same when shut, they do not have to be modified and their use is limited better preserving the barn doors.

4. Any other alternatives considered require modifications to the walls and opening.

If you have any additional questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
Jerry Bernau, Board Member
823 Sutter Street, Folsom, CA 95630
916.985.2707
www.folsomhistory.org

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 6
Plan Set

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 7
Color and Materials Board

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
196 Wool Street
The Square, Ashland Station, The Blacksmith Annex
Color Board

French Doors - Simpson 77512
Nantucket ¾ Lite

Stain- CUTEK® Colortones in
“Ashwood” double strength to match
existing aged wood

Roof- Corrugated metal to match
existing roof

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 8
Historic Photos

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
1 Eugene Hepting 1939

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
2 1976

1973

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
3 1976

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 9
Site Photos

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Ashland Station West elevation

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Blacksmith Annex Location

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 10
HPL Comment 11/4/25

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

HERITAGE PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF FOLSOM

PROJECT APPLICATION REVIEW
November 4, 2025

PROJECT SITE: The Square on Folsom’s Historic Railroad Block in the Sutter Street Subarea Including: Ashland Station at 815 Leidesdorff Street and the Blacksmith Shop at 196 Wool Street.

REQUEST: Design Review of Building Modifications, Building Additions and Repairs

PROJECT HISTORY: Application Circulated by the City on October 23, 2025 Feedback requested by November 12, 2025

PROJECT SITE
The Square is an interpretive area at the northeast corner of Folsom’s Historic Railroad Block. In 1856 this site became the end-station of California’s first railroad between Sacramento and Folsom. The Railroad Block is listed as California Historical Landmark No. 558 under the title: ‘Terminal of Californias First Passenger Railroad’.

ASHLAND STATION
History
Historic records support the local belief that Ashland Station was built by Sacramento, Placer and Nevada Railroad in 1862. The building is known as the oldest railroad building in California and the only remaining building associated with Sacramento Valley Railroad. The structure was relocated from a site across the American River to Folsom’s Historic Railroad Block in 1973.

Environmental Statement
The applicant has requested an exemption from environmental review based on Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation). This exemption applies when all the repairs are completed in consistency with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards.

Foundation and Framing
A unique part of Ashland Station is the heavy timber frame, assembled without hardware. The building has a large perimeter beam with mortice and tenon joints. Vertical posts raise the lower beam 2-2.5 feet above grade. The application does not provide any information about the current condition of the foundation or framing.

A new 10’x 13’ raised deck has been proposed along the west façade of Ashland Station. While the building elevations show that posts will be installed to support the perimeter of the new deck, it is not clear if new posts will also be installed along the foundation of Ashland Station. As an option, the applicant may intend to rest the deck on a new header that is attached directly to the historic structure.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Any excavation close to the existing foundation posts could be a concern. Attaching a header board and applying weight to the old railroad structure may also compromise the existing foundation and building frame. Before the deck design is finalized, Ashland Station should therefore be inspected by an engineer or architect with a structural background.

Proposed Building Alterations
Several changes are proposed along the west façade of Ashland Station. In addition to the deck addition, the existing large barn doors are proposed to be re-hung along an exterior overhead rail. The applicant is also proposing to install a three-paneled French door along the inside of the existing opening. Since the existing structure does not have insulation, heating or air-conditioning, the purpose of an extra door is not clear. The proposed new door with mostly glass, also does not seem compatible with the rustic railroad building.

Previous Building Alterations
Prior to 2010, a narrow, covered storage area was installed against a portion of the north elevation of Ashland Station. By 2015 the storage area was expanded to the full length of the building, and the roof cover was raised up to allow for a seating area. As a result, it may be difficult to access the doors along the north side of the building (including two 6-foot-wide sliding doors and a 3-foot-wide man door). In addition, most of the north building facade is no longer visible from Leidesdorff Street.

In 2021, a new entrance door with a small porch cover was installed along the west elevation. This addition was not consistent with the early railroad design, and the applicant is now proposing to remove these additions. A small deck area that also was installed in 2021 will be preserved and used to access the proposed new deck.

Maintenance
The applicant is proposing to replace some of the visibly deteriorated exterior materials (including siding and trim boards). However, the application package does not include any information regarding potential structural damage.

Project Site
A small shed has been located close to the southwest corner of the train depot. This storage building does not complement the historic design and building materials used for Ashland Station, and it also provides a minimal separation from the old railroad building.

General Statement:

The applicant is the City’s selected developer of the railroad block. Bernau Development Corporation has also been responsible for the restauration of Folsom’s historic passenger depot. HPL is therefore confident that the restauration of Ashland Depot will be completed as specified by the Secretary of the Interiors. However, based on the age and history of the railroad building, HPL recommends that the overall structure should be inspected for damage before the repairs are approved. In addition, HPL

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
recommends that the applicant should be required to document the repair work and submit a follow-up report to Folsom History (the property owner) and the City.

HPL supports the applicants intent to maintain Ashland Station and to keep the building available for public use. However, HPL would like more information about how the proposed French door may improve the future use of Ashland Station. As an option, the existing doors could be hung along the interior of the building (similar to the four existing cargo doors). This would provide a wide opening towards the deck area and expand the use of the building without introducing a new door that is less compatible with the railroad depot.

Project Recommendations:

1. Add the following information to the submittal package:
a) A project narrative, that describes the future plans for Ashland Station. b) A professional report that analyzes the current condition of Ashland Station specifies what repairs are needed and describes the least invasive way to support the new deck. c) Details of the deck, deck railing and a three-panel door. (The selected door should have a more commercial design).

2. The applicant or an independent monitor should be responsible for the supervision of the project and the preparation of a follow-up report that is submitted to Folsom History (the property owner) and the City.

Proposed Future Goals:
• Remove the covered deck area that obstructs the north façade of Ashland Station (and access to three existing doors).
• Relocate the small shed (with T-111 siding) that is located close to the southwest corner of Ashland Station.

THE BLACKSMITH SHOP
Folsom’s Blacksmith Forge is located at the northeast corner of Leidesdorff Street and Wool Street. It is a replica of the railroad shop that at one time was used by Sacramento Valley Railroad.

The applicant is proposing to install an open structure with a small, enclosed storage space close to the west side of the existing building. A project narrative has not been provided, but it appears that the blacksmith annex will replace the existing public seating area close to the Wool Street entrance to The Square.

Regarding the proposed façade materials, HPL recommends that the applicant should select a roof material with the profile of early metal roofs (non-corrugated sheet metal with flat or standing seams).

Project Recommendation:

Add the following information to the submittal package:

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
a) A project narrative, that describes the future plans for the Blacksmith Shop and Annex. b) Details of the proposed exterior materials, including roofing, roof vents, a door and potentially paint colors. (Select a roof material that is compatible with materials used between 1850 and 1950.)

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Historic District Commission
The Square (Pioneer Village) Rehabilitation Project (DRCL25-00235) February 4, 2026

Attachment 11
Applicant Response to HPL Comments

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

HERITAGE PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF FOLSOM

PROJECT APPLICATION REVIEW
November 4, 2025

PROJECT SITE: The Square on Folsom’s Historic Railroad Block in the Su!er Street Subarea Including: Ashland Sta&on at 815 Leidesdorff Street and the Blacksmith Shop at 196 Wool Street.

REQUEST: Design Review of Building Modifica&ons, Building Addi&ons and Repairs

PROJECT HISTORY: Applica&on Circulated by the City on October 23, 2025 Feedback requested by November 12, 2025

PROJECT SITE
The Square is an interpre&ve area at the northeast corner of Folsom’s Historic Railroad Block. In 1856 this site became the end-sta&on of California’s first railroad between Sacramento and Folsom. The Railroad Block is listed as California Historical Landmark No. 558 under the &tle: ‘Terminal of Californias First Passenger Railroad’.

ASHLAND STATION
History
Hist oric records support the local belief that Ashland Sta&on was built by Sacramento, Placer and Nevada Railroad in 1862. The building is known as the oldest railroad building in California and the only remaining building associated with Sacramento Valley Railroad. The structure was relocated from a site across the American River to Folsom’s Historic Railroad Block in 1973.

Environmental Statement
The applicant has requested an exemp&on from environmental review based on Sec&on 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Historical Resource Restora&on/Rehabilita&on). This exemp&on applies when all the repairs are completed in consistency with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards.

Founda&on and Framing
A unique part of Ashland Sta&on is the heavy &mber frame, assembled without hardware. The building has a large perimeter beam with mor&ce and tenon joints. Ver&cal posts raise the lower beam 2-2.5 feet above grade. The applica&on does not provide any informa&on about the current condi&on of the founda&on or framing.

A new 10’x 13’ raised deck has been proposed along the west façade of Ashland Sta&on. While the building eleva&ons show that posts will be installed to support the perimeter of the new deck, it is not clear if new posts will also be installed along the founda&on of Ashland Sta&on. As an op&on, the applicant may intend to rest the deck on a new header that is a!ached directly to the historic structure.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

The deck will be built free standing without any connecon to the exisng structure. The foong for the deck support posts will be placed so there is no surcharge impacng the exisng foongs/foundaon of Ashland Staon. As part of the building plans to be submi ed, structural engineering will confirm this.

Any excava&on close to the exis&ng founda&on posts could be a concern.

The deck foongs are relavely shallow and will be spaced away from the exisng structure’s foongs/foundaon to eliminate any potenal undermining. As part of the building plans to be submi
ed, structural engineering will confirm that.

A!aching a header board and applying weight to the old railroad structure may also compromise the exis&ng founda&on and building frame. Before the deck design is finalized, Ashland Sta&on should therefore be inspected by an engineer or architect with a structural background.

The deck will not impact the structure of the exisng structure in any way. The sliding barn door hardware may require backing for a
achment. The structural engineer will review this too.

The true divided light F. doors will be sized for the exisng door opening under the exisng header.

Proposed Building Altera&ons
Several changes are proposed along the west façade of Ashland Sta&on. In addi&on to the deck addi&on, the exis&ng large barn doors are proposed to be re-hung along an exterior overhead rail. The applicant is also proposing to install a three-paneled French door along the inside of the exis&ng opening. Since the exis&ng structure does not have insula&on, hea&ng or air-condi&oning, the purpose of an extra door is not clear. The proposed new door with mostly glass, also does not seem compa&ble with the rus&c railroad building.

For fire, life and safety, a second exit is required for egress. In 2021, that is why the door was added to the west elevaon. The exisng barn doors do not meet code for egress. The new Fr. doors in the exisng door opening will meet this egress requirement without a new penetraon in the west elevaon. When the barn doors are closed, the Fr. doors will be covered from the exterior elevaon. The new specified true divided light Fr. doors are consistent with the style of Fr. doors in other railroad depots built in the mid-1800s.

Previous Building Altera&ons
Prior to 2010, a narrow, covered storage area was installed against a por&on of the north eleva&on of Ashland Sta&on. By 2015 the storage area was expanded to the full length of the building, and the roof cover was raised up to allow for a sea&ng area. As a result, it may be difficult to access the doors along the north side of the building (including two 6-foot-wide sliding doors and a 3-foot-wide man door). In addi&on, most of the north building facade is no longer visible from Leidesdorff Street.

In 2021, a new entrance door with a small porch cover was installed along the west eleva&on. This addi&on was not consistent with the early railroad design, and the applicant is now proposing to remove

02/10/2026 Item No.4.
these addi&ons. A small deck area that also was installed in 2021 will be preserved and used to access the proposed new deck.

Maintenance
The applicant is proposing to replace some of the visibly deteriorated exterior materials (including siding and trim boards). However, the applica&on package does not include any informa&on regarding poten&al structural damage.

Project Site
A small shed has been located close to the southwest corner of the train depot. This storage building does not complement the historic design and building materials used for Ashland Sta&on, and it also provides a minimal separa&on from the old railroad building.

The applicaon does not address the exisng storage building.

General Statement:

The applicant is the City’s selected developer of the railroad block. Bernau Development Corpora&on has also been responsible for the restaura&on of Folsom’s historic passenger depot. HPL is therefore confident that the restaura&on of Ashland Depot will be completed as specified by the Secretary of the Interiors. However, based on the age and history of the railroad building, HPL recommends that the overall structure should be inspected for damage before the repairs are approved. In addi&on, HPL recommends that the applicant should be required to document the repair work and submit a follow-up report to Folsom History (the property owner) and the City.

All work will be documented and provided as recommended.

HPL supports the applicants intent to maintain Ashland Sta&on and to keep the building available for public use. However, HPL would like more informa&on about how the proposed French door may improve the future use of Ashland Sta&on. As an op&on, the exis&ng doors could be hung along the interior of the building (similar to the four exis&ng cargo doors). This would provide a wide opening towards the deck area and expand the use of the building without introducing a new door that is less compa&ble with the railroad depot.

Instead of swinging hinge hardware, the exisng barn doors will be mounted to sliding barn door hardware on the outside of the building. This will allow code compliant Fr. doors to be mounted in the exisng opening. When Ashland Staon is in use, the exisng barn doors cannot currently be le- open for egress or light because of fall hazards, weather and road noise.

Project Recommenda&ons:

1. Add the following informa&on to the submi!al package:
a) A project narra&ve, that describes the future plans for Ashland Sta&on.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

At this me, the applicaon is for the blacksmith annex and the removal of the exisng door and shed roof that was added in 2021. The deck and Fr. doors simply replace this egress requirement while maintaining the historical integrity of the freight building.

b) A professional report that analyzes the current condi&on of Ashland Sta&on specifies what repairs are needed and describes the least invasive way to support the new deck.

This deck will not impact the exisng structure. Historically, it is very common that a freight dock and/or ramp were used to access the raised floor of a railroad freight depot.

c) Details of the deck, deck railing and a three-panel door. (The selected door should have a more commercial design).

The Fr. doors are of the same design as similar depots of the mid-1800s and are sourced from the same manufacturer that supplied the new Fr. doors in the SP depot, next door. The railing and balusters shown are simple square wood balusters as would have been installed in the 1800’s.

2. The applicant or an independent monitor should be responsible for the supervision of the project and the prepara&on of a follow-up report that is submi!ed to Folsom History (the property owner) and the City.

Since 1994, the applicant is a licensed California General Contractor located in Folsom with significant design and construcon experience in Folsom’s historic District including the SP depot at 200 Wool Street, 807/809 Su
er Street, 823 Su
er Street, 824 Su
er Street, 905-915 Su
er
Street, 921 Su
er Street, 507, 509, & 511 Figueroa Street, 509 Wool Street, 610 Mormon Street, 909 Mormon Street and the relocaon of Emma’s Place to 216 Natoma Street. On behalf of Folsom Cordova Unified School District, the applicant also researched, evaluated and prepared the successful nominaon of Granite Grammar School to the California Register of Historic Resources.

Proposed Future Goals:
• Remove the covered deck area that obstructs the north façade of Ashland Sta&on (and access to three exis&ng doors).
• Relocate the small shed (with T-111 siding) that is located close to the southwest corner of Ashland Sta&on.

The exisng Fr. door and shed roof that were added in 2021 will be removed.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

THE BLACKSMITH SHOP
Folsom’s Blacksmith Forge is located at the northeast corner of Leidesdorff Street and Wool Street. It is a replica of the railroad shop that at one &me was used by Sacramento Valley Railroad.

The applicant is proposing to install an open structure with a small, enclosed storage space close to the west side of the exis&ng building. A project narra&ve has not been provided, but it appears that the blacksmith annex will replace the exis&ng public sea&ng area close to the Wool Street entrance to The Square.

The site plan shows the black smith annex will be built just west of the current blacksmith shop and north of the sidewalk just north of Ashland Staon. This is not an exisng public seang area. It is where a temporary metal frame canopy structure exists where blacksmithing currently take place.

Regarding the proposed façade materials, HPL recommends that the applicant should select a roof material with the profile of early metal roofs (non-corrugated sheet metal with flat or standing seams).

The metal roof will match the metal roof on Ashland Staon.

Project Recommenda&on:

Add the following informa&on to the submi!al package:
a) A project narra&ve, that describes the future plans for the Blacksmith Shop and Annex.

Blacksmithing is very popular at the Square. When we have classes or are busy, the blacksmiths currently expand into this area. It will also be used for vising blacksmiths. It will replace the temporary metal frame and a
ached tarps.

b) Details of the proposed exterior materials, including roofing, roof vents, a door and poten&ally paint colors. (Select a roof material that is compa&ble with materials used between 1850 and 1950.)

As presented in the color board, the natural wood will be stained to match the exisng blacksmith shop, and the metal roof will match Ashland Staon. The metal vents and hardware will be black to match the exisng blacksmith shop.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council Meeting

Additional Information
Transmittal

Instructions to staff: Deliver original and 30 stapled/double-sided copies to the City Clerk’s Department; City Clerk’s Department will distribute via email and hardcopy to City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk.

Updated: Jan 2026
MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
STAFF REPORT TITLE Resolution No. 11533 – A Resolution Approving the Historic District Commission’s Recommendation for Approval of a
Design Review for The Square (Pioneer Village)
Rehabilitation Project Located at 115 Wool Street and
Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA Under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures) and Section 15331 (Historical Resource
Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines

FROM: Community Development Department

Staff is providing the attached additional information for the above-referenced agenda item:

Even though Google Maps shows the address of The Square (also known as Pioneer Village) as 196 Wool Street, the official address listed by the Sacramento County Assessor’s Office is 115 Wool Street.

02/10/2026 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11546 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with REY Engineering, Inc. for Contract Development Engineering Management Staff Services up to $200,000 Utilizing Salary and Benefit Cost Savings from the General Fund (Fund 010)

FROM: Community Development Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council move to approve Resolution No. 11546 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with REY Engineering, Inc. for Contract Development Engineering Management Staff Services up to $200,000 U tilizing Salary and Benefit Cost Savings from the General Fund (Fund 010).

BACKGROUND
All engineering plans for proposed development in the C ity of Folsom are submitted to the Community Development Department, Engineering Division. The submittals are reviewed by qualified plan check staff for conformance to engineering standards and best practices prior to issuance of site improvement permits . Once the site improvement permits are issued and construction begins, qualified construction inspection staff will inspect the site to ensure construction is consistent with the approved plans and requirements.

Development activity in the City each year fluctuates in response to a variety of factors including but not limited to economic conditions, market demand, land use trends, and land availability and readiness. Regardless of the fluctuation, the City is obligated to review plans, issue permits, and conduct inspections in a timely manner . Since the recession in 2008, the Community Development Department has utilized a model of minimal baseline staffing in all divisions for relatively low levels of development activity and utilizing a contract service model to supplement baseline staffing levels for higher levels of development activity for plan check, inspections, and contract surveying services. For the last ten-year period, development activity has consistently exceeded baseline staffing capacity and the City has utilized contract services for a variety of engineering service demands. Costs for those contract services are generally covered by the pay for service model of fee revenue associated with development activity.

02/10/2026 Item No.5.
2 On January 14, 2026 City Council approved additional contract budget appropriation for both development engineering and building services to support higher levels of development activity. At the same time, Community Development has been recruiting to fill several current staffing vacancies in the development engineering team as shown in the table below.

CDD Engineering Positions # Staff Current Status
Development Engineering Manager 1 Vacant
Senior Civil Engineer 1 Vacant
Assistant Civil Engineer 2 Filled
Senior Construction Inspector 1 Vacant

Currently, with the promotion and transfer of top senior engineering staff (Rebecca Neves and Turaj Hosseini) to the Public Works Department, the Community Development Engineering Team has three vacant positions. After a recent failed recruitment for Development Engineering Manager, staff recommends a half -time consultant contract to staff that role for the 2026 calendar year utilizing salary and benefit cost savings from the vacant position . Community Development will move forward with recruitments for the vacant Senior Civil Engineer and Senior Construction Inspector in the near term and plan to recruit for Development Engineering Manager again in the next nine to twelve months.

Staff is recommending the City Manager be authorized to execute a contract with REY Engineering, Inc for a part -time contract Development Engineering Manager for a one -year period, with a cumulative not-to-exceed annual amount of $200,000 utilizing savings from General Fund (Fund 010) salary and benefit cost savings for that position.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, contracts greater than $77,426 shall be awarded by the City Council. Contracts for professional services are not required to go through a standard public procurement process pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code section

2.36.120. Engineering services are included in the definition of professional services in section

2.36.030. As applicable here, contracting for any work or operation of the City is a City Management Right as described in the City of Folsom Personnel Rules and Regulations, section

2.03.030(H).

ANALYSIS
As described in the background section of this report, Folsom has experienced consistently high volumes of development engineering permit, plan check, and inspection activity over the last ten years exceeding our baseline staffing capacity. The third- party service contracts for engineering services that were authorized in 2025 included on-call staffing positions in addition to engineering plan check, surveying, and inspection services. In response to engineering staffing vacancies for promotion and reorganization in October and November 2025, Community Development requested consultant resumes for Development Engineering Manager and selected Vanessa Humphreys, PE, with REY Engineering, Inc for a limited term supplemental staffing during recruitment for that position.

02/10/2026 Item No.5.
3 In January 2026, the City conducted interviews for Development Engineering Manager to replace Rebecca Neves and were unsuccessful in finding a qualified candidate to lead the team.

Community Development now recommends a longer-term contract solution to fill the staffing vacancy for Development Engineering Manager while we recruit for the other two staffing vacancies. Fortunately, Vanessa Humphreys , PE, with REY, Engineering Inc. has agreed to serve as contract Development Engineering Manager approximately half time for the 2026 calendar year. Vanessa lives and works in Folsom and has more than 28 years of experience in public works, residential, and commercial development projects. Va nessa will be contracted approximately half time (20 hours/week) to manage the team and services for development engineering in partnership with other City divisions and departments. Staff anticipates that the appropriation of time (20 hours/week) for the Contract Development Engineering Manager will be distributed and funded as outlined below.

 Administrative Work (~10 hours/week). This mid-management position includes staff training and mentoring, coordination with other Community Development divisions and other City departments, responding to public inquiries, and other non- billable tasks .

This work would be paid for through City Council appropriated salary and benefit cost savings from the vacant Development Engineering Manager position under this new contract and is not anticipated to be full cost recovery.

 Development Project Work (~10 hours/week). For larger and more complex engineering reviews of development projects, this mid-management position would lead in-house engineering plan check with cost recovery from engineering fees paid for through appropriated contract engineering budget . On January 12, 2026 City Council amended the contract engineering budget appropriation to increase the initial contract budget amount and the contract expenses for this work would be covered under that contract budget and are anticipated to be full cost recovery.

In the current FY 2025- 26 budget approved by City Council , salary and benefit funds for the Development Engineering Manager in the amount of $216,614 are budgeted and available annually for this position. REY Engineering, Inc. hourly rate for contract Development Engineering Manager is $315/hour. The annual cost for 10 hours estimated administrative work each week for a year is $163,800. Staff has also requested that REY prepare an update to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance in the Folsom Municipal Code at a cost of not more than $20,000.

This resolution requests approval to transfer $200,000 from engineering salary and benefit savings to execute a one-year contract with REY Engineering, Inc for a not -to-exceed amount of $200,000 for supplemental contract staff services as outlined herein.

The cost of baseline development engineering staffing and supplemental contract consultant services is primarily offset by revenue generated by Engineering Plan Check and Inspection Fees adopted by City Council Resolution. There are some services provided by the engineering staff that do not have a corresponding fee or revenue source (e.g., public record requests, public inquiries, certain enforcement services, surveying and mapping of City owned property).

The General Fund (Fund 010) Engineering Division salary and be nefit appropriation is established by City Council budget authorization. In the current FY 2025-26 budget, salary and

02/10/2026 Item No.5.
4 benefit funds for the Development Engineering Manager in the amount of $216,614 are budgeted and available annually with incremental adjustments. This Resolution authorizes the transfer of $200,000 from appropriated engineering division salary and benefit cost savings to support part-time contract staffing for the Development Engineering Manager for one year with REY Engineering, Inc up to a not to exceed amount of $200,000.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
If approved, the contract with REY Engineering, Inc. would be approved for an amount not to exceed $200,000. Adequate funding is available within the General Fund (Fund 010) to support this expenditure. The cost of the agreement will be fully offset by salary and benefit savings resulting from the vacant Development Engineering Manager position.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) ( the Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11546 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with REY Engineering, Inc. for Contract Development Engineering Management Staff Services up to $200,000 utilizing Salary and Benefit Cost Savings from the General Fund (Fund 010)

Submitted,

Pam Johns, Community Development Director

02/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 11546

RESOLUTION NO. 11546

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH REY ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONTRACT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT STAFF SERVICES UP TO $200,000 UTILIZING SALARY AND BENEFIT COST SAVINGS FROM THE GENERAL FUND (FUND 010)

WHEREAS, the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, has established the need for as-needed outside development engineering staffing, plan check, construction inspection, and on-call surveying services; and

WHEREAS, funds have been appropriated and are available for this purpose in the 2025-2026 fiscal year budget through both salary and benefits and engineering contracts; and

WHEREAS, engineering staff vacancies and recruitment challenges have created the need to consider contract staff services; and

WHEREAS, City Council has appropriated $216,614 for the Development Engineering Manager salary and benefits as part of the FY 2025-26 annual budget; and

WHEREAS, the Development Engineering Manager position has been vacant since September 1, 2025 and after an unsuccessful recruitment for the position, Community Development recommends an alternative part-time contract position with a qualified consultant for a full year; and

WHEREAS, REY Engineering, Inc. is a qualified consultant currently under contract with the City to provide engineering services; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a contract with REY Engineering, Inc. for c ontract Development Engineering Management Staff Services up to $200,000 with Salary and Benefit Cost Savings in the General Fund (Fund 010).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.5.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

02/10/2026 Item No.5.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11547 – A Resolution Electing to Participate in and Authorizing the City Manager to Implement the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act in
Conformance with Public Contract Code 22010

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11547 - A Resolution Electing to Participate in and Authorizing the City Manager to Implement the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act in Conformance with Public Contract Code 22010.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA) is a voluntary statutory program that provides alternative bidding procedures for public works projects under specified dollar thresholds identified in Public Contract Code 22032 and 22034. By adopting CUPCCAA, the City of Folsom will be authorized to use informal bidding procedures for public works projects up to the statutory limit (currently $220,000 as adjusted every five years by the State Controller), improving efficiency, reducing administrative burden, and increasing flexibility in delivering routine infrastructure maintenance and repair projects such as concrete and asphalt work.

Currently, the City of Folsom is not subject to CUPCCAA and must follow the standard competitive formal bidding procedures for public works projects under the Folsom Municipal Code. These procedures generally require formal bidding for most public works projects, regardless of size, unless another statutory exception applies.

CUPCCAA was enacted to provide local agencies with a uniform and streamlined accounting and bidding framework for smaller public works projects, while maintaining competitive

02/10/2026 Item No.6.
pricing and transparency. Participation in CUPCCAA is voluntary and requires adoption by City Council resolution and notification to the State Controller’s Office. Currently, 303 of the 483 incorporated cities in the state are participating in this voluntary adoption.

POLICY / RULE

Public works contracting and procurement by the City of Folsom is governed by the Folsom Municipal Code Chapters 2.36 and 2.37 and the City’s adopted purchasing and contracting policies, which require compliance with the California Public Contract Code and established approval thresholds for the City Council and City Manager. Adoption of CUPCCAA does not alter these local authority limits but provides an alternative bidding framework that may be used within existing City approval authority.

The California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (Public Contract Code §§22000–22045) authorizes local agencies to use alternative bidding and accounting procedures for public works projects upon election by resolution of the governing body.

Key provisions include:

• PCC §22030 – Election to participate in CUPCCAA and notice to the State Controller; • PCC §22032 – Establishment of dollar thresholds for force account, informal bidding, and formal bidding, as adjusted annually by the State Controller; • PCC §22034 – Informal bidding procedures and award to the lowest responsible bidder; • PCC §22033 – Prohibition on splitting projects to evade bidding requirements.

Once adopted, CUPCCAA will allow the City to use informal bidding procedures for eligible public works projects up to the statutory limit (currently $220,000), while projects exceeding that amount will continue to require formal competitive bidding.

Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) may be used to establish or update lists of qualified contractors for informal bidding under CUPCCAA. Final award of any public works project shall be based on price competition and awarded to the lowest responsible bidder in accordance with the Public Contract Code.

Recently, the City advertised a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in accordance with CUPCCAA requirements to establish on-call construction contractor lists by trade. As a result of this outreach, the City received nine Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from interested contractors. City staff are currently reviewing and evaluating the submitted SOQs to determine qualified contractors for inclusion on the on-call lists. Upon completion of this review, staff will bring an item to City Council in the near future recommending award of on-call construction contracts to the selected contractors, with individual projects to be bid and awarded based on price competition consistent with CUPCCAA informal bidding procedures.

ANALYSIS

02/10/2026 Item No.6.

Once adopted, CUPCCAA authorizes the City to use the following procedures (based on current Public Contract Code 22032 thresholds:

a) Public projects up to $75,000: May be performed by City employees (force account), negotiated contract, or purchase order.
b) Public projects up to $220,000: May be awarded using informal bidding procedures, which include solicitation of written bids from a list of qualified contractors. c) Public projects exceeding $220,000: Must be awarded using formal competitive bidding procedures.

The $220,000 threshold is adjusted every five years by the State Controller pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22020.

Informal Bidding Procedures

Under CUPCCAA, informal bidding requires the City to:
• Maintain a list of qualified contractors by trade category. • Provide notice inviting informal bids to all contractors on the applicable list. • Award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder.
• Avoid splitting projects to circumvent bidding thresholds.

The City may use a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process to establish or refresh its contractor lists, provided that final award of each project is based on price competition consistent with CUPCCAA requirements.

Benefits to the City

Adoption of CUPCCAA will:
• Reduce procurement timelines for small and mid-sized public works projects. • Enhance flexibility in delivering routine infrastructure maintenance. • Maintain transparency and competition.
• Align the City with common best practices used by peer agencies statewide.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

There is no direct fi nancial impact associated with the adoption of CUPCCAA. The Act provides alternative procurement procedures but does not increase project costs or obligate the City to expend funds beyond those already budgeted for public works projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The recommended action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5), as it is an administrative action that does not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment.

02/10/2026 Item No.6.

ATTACHMENT

Resolution No. 11547 - A Resolution Electing to Participate in and Authorizing the City Manager to Implement the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act in Conformance with Public Contract Code 22010

Submitted,

Rebecca Neves, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

02/10/2026 Item No.6.

Resolution No. 11547

RESOLUTION NO. 11547

A RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT THE CALIFORNIA UNIFORM PUBLIC

CONSTRUCTION COST ACCOUNTING ACT IN CONFORMANCE WITH PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE 22010

WHEREAS, the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA), Public Contract Code sections 22000 et seq., establishes alternative accounting and bidding procedures for public works projects under specified dollar thresholds; and

WHEREAS, CUPCCAA authorizes public agencies to use informal bidding procedures for qualifying public works projects, thereby improving efficiency while maintaining competition and transparency; and

WHEREAS, participation in CUPCCAA is voluntary and requires adoption of a resolution by the governing body and notification to the State Controller’s Office pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22030; and

WHEREAS, adoption of CUPCCAA will allow the City of Folsom to utilize informal bidding procedures for eligible public works projects up to the statutory threshold, as adjusted every five years by the State Controller, while projects exceeding that threshold will continue to require formal competitive bidding; and

WHEREAS, CUPCCAA requires the City to maintain lists of qualified contractors by trade category, provide notice inviting informal bids to contractors on the applicable list, award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, and avoid splitting projects to circumve nt bidding requirements; and

WHEREAS, the City may use a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process to establish or update contractor lists for informal bidding purposes, provided that final award of individual projects is based on price competition consistent with CUPCCAA; and

WHEREAS, the City Attorney has reviewed the City’s proposed participation in the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act and has determined that implementation of the Act presents no known legal issues or conflicts with existing law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom elects to participate in and authorizes the City Manager to implement the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10
th day of February 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

02/10/2026 Item No.6.

Resolution No. 11547

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11549 – A Resolution Accepting 2023 and 2025 Growth Funding and 2024 Initial Funding, Citizen’s Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grants for the Purchase of Technology, Recruiting/Promotion Services and Equipment to Improve Police Operations in Accordance with State Requirements and
Appropriation of Funds in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012)

FROM: Police Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council pass and ado pt Resolution No. 11549 - A Resolution Accepting 2023 and 2025 Growth Funding and 2024 Ini tial Funding, Citizen’s Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grants for the Purchase of Technology, Recruiting/Promotion Services and Equipment to Improve Police Operations in Accor dance with State Requirements and Appropriation of Funds in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012)

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In fiscal year 1996/97 the State of California first enacted the Citizen’s Option for Public Safety (COPS) program under Assembly Bill 3229. Under this program, cities and counties receive state funds to augment front-line police services. Grant awards are based on per capita population, with $100,000 being the minimum guaranteed award. The City of Folsom has been awarded funding for fiscal year 2022-23 (growth) of $112,567.56, fiscal year 2023-24 (initial) of $132,933.03, fiscal year 2024-25 (growth) of $13 8,019.80. These funds were received but mistakenly not approved by council for appropriation.

Government Code Section 30061 requires that these funds shall be appropriated pursuant to a request from the Police Chief or the Chief Administ rator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for the respective city. The request for use of this funding shall specify the front-line law enforcement needs of the request ing entity including the personnel, equipment, and programs that are necessary to meet those needs.

02/10/2026 Item No.7.
2 POLICY / RULE
The Citizen’s Option for Public Safety program is an on-going state program, but it requires a separate budget appropriation for continued funding . The funds must be used to supplement and not supplant existing local funding for law enforcement services.

ANALYSIS
The Citizen’s Option for Public Safety Funds cannot be used for administrative overhead allocations more than 0.5 percent, nor can the allocation be used to fund the costs of any capital project or construction project that does not direc tly support front-line law enforcement services.

The City of Folsom and the Folsom Police Department are committed to utilizing technology to identify and deter criminals, as well as for adm inistrative purposes like recruiting and promotion. The Folsom Police Department is also com mitted to acquiring and updating equipment in the department to provide services to the public as well as to be as efficient with staff time as possible.

The Chief of Police requests approval to utilize AB 3229 Citizen’s Option for Public Safety state funds for FYs 2023-25 in the amount of $383,5 20.39 for the purchase of technology, recruiting/promotion services and equipment to improve police operations.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There are no matching requirements for the AB3229 funds and no direct impact on the General Fund. Because COPS Funds are required to be separately appropriated, staff is also requesting an appropriation of $383,520.39 to be added to the police department budget for the FY 2025- 26 COPS funding award disbursement received from th e County of Sacramento Department of Finance. The appropriation will be made in the FY 2025-26 budget in the Police Department in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11549- A Resolution Accepting 2023 and 2025 Growth Funding and 2024 Initial Funding, Citizen’s Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grants for the Purchase of Technology, Recruiting/Promotion Services and Equip ment to Improve Police Operations in Accordance with State Requirements and Appropriatio n of Funds in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012).

Submitted,

Adam Green, Chief of Police

02/10/2026 Item No.7.

Attachment 1

02/10/2026 Item No.7.

Resolution No. 11549

RESOLUTION NO. 11549

A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 2023 AND 2025 GROWTH FUNDING AND 2024 INITIAL FUNDING, CITIZEN’S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) GRANTS

FOR THE PURCHASE OF TECHNOLOGY, RECRUITING/PROMOTION SERVICES

AND EQUIPMENT TO IMPROVE POLICE OPERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH

STATE REQUIREMENTS AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE GENERAL GRANT FUND (FUND 012)

WHEREAS, the State of California enacted the Citizen’s Optio n for Public Safety (COPS) program, under Assembly Bill 3229, to fund front-line law enforcement services ; and

WHEREAS,
the COPS funding awarded to the City of Folsom for fiscal year 2022-23 (growth) was $ 112,567.56; fiscal year 2023-24 (initial) was $ 132,933.03; fiscal year 2024-25 (growth) was $138,019.80 and

WHEREAS,
these state funds are separate and apart from the p roposed allocations from the City’s general fund and an appropriation is needed; and

WHEREAS ,
the Chief of Police has requested to allocate and a ppropriate these funds for the purchase of technology, recruiting/promotion services and equipment to improve police operations ; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that the City Council of the City of Folsom
hereby authorizes the use of the AB3229, Citizen’s Option for Public Safety (COPS) state funding in accordance with the request of the Chief of Police to purchase technology, recruiting/promotion servic es and equipment to improve police operations.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate an additional $383,520.39 as expenditures and as intergovernmental revenue in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012) to the Police Department budget in fiscal year 2025-26.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11550 A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program Offered by the California Highway Patrol, to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Provide DUI
Enforcement and Training, and Purchase Police Vehicles

FROM: Police Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Counci l pass and adopt Resolution No.11550 – A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program Offered by the California Highway Patrol , to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Provide DUI Enforcement and Training, and Purchase Police Vehicles

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Enhancing Road Safety Through Proactive Measures
From 2020 to 2024, Folsom experienced collisions involving impaired drivers, resulting in injuries and fatalities. However, in 2025, thanks to grant-funded proactive saturation patrols and DUI checkpoints, the city saw a 66% decrease in DUI-related traffic collisions.

Officers conducted 212 arrests for driving under the influence during patrol operations and dedicated enforcement efforts. These efforts are part of a broader commitment to ensuring our streets are safe for everyone.

Securing Funding for Future Initiatives

02/10/2026 Item No.8.
2 To further these safety goals, the Folsom Police Department seeks to apply for a State of California grant from the California Highway Patrol. This funding is crucial and will be used for:
• DUI checkpoints and other enforcement activities.
• Educational presentations for school groups to promote safe driving. • The purchase of specialized equipment including LIDAR units • The acquisition of new police vehicles to be used for traffic and DUI enforcement.

This grant will allow the police department to continue its proactive approach to road safety, building on the progress already made and ensuring Folsom remains a safe community.

POLICY / RULE

City Council Resolution 8367 states that grant applications, including any requiring an ongoing commitment of resources or staff, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to submittal.

ANALYSIS

Law Enforcement grants provide financial assistance to allied agencies for the education, prevention, and the enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products. The intent of the se programs is to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve the Organization/Agency’s effectiveness through training and development of new strategies. Each of these action items will help reduce the number of DUI collisions and hopefully lower the BAC level found during arrests.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The State of California through the Department of the California Highway Patrol is offering the grant with no local matching funds required. If awarded, staff will return to request the City Council authorize the City Manager to accept the grant award, and also request an increase in revenue estimates and appropriations in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012). Costs would be funded initially through the General Grant Fund (Fund 012) and reimbursed by the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 11550 – A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program offered by the California Highway Patrol , to

02/10/2026 Item No.8.
3 Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Provide DUI Enforcement and Training, and Purchase Police Vehicles.

Submitted,

Adam Green, Chief of Police

02/10/2026 Item No.8.

Resolution No. 11550

RESOLUTION NO. 11550

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR A

CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PROGRAM OFFERED BY THE CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY PATROL, TO REDUCE AND MITIGATE THE IMPACTS OF IMPAIRED

DRIVING, PROVIDE DUI ENFORCEMENT AND TRAINING, AND PURCHASE

POLICE VEHICLES
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom Police Department is requesting the City Council authorize the Police Department to apply for a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant program for the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, from the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol; and,
WHEREAS, selective enforcement of the primary causes of collisions are an effective way to deter motorists would speed, drive while under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products, or otherwise drive unsafe, thereby reducing fatal and injury collisions; and,
WHEREAS, the grant monies will be used to reimburse personnel overtime costs associated with selective traffic enforcement and the training of officers in the detection, apprehension and prosecution of impaired drivers; and,
WHEREAS, the grant monies will be used to conduct community outreach programs through school presentations and “Know Your Limits” campaigns; and, WHEREAS, the grant monies will be used to purchase equipment used for DUI checkpoints, police traffic vehicles and the associated radios and emergency equipment.

WHEREAS, the grant monies require no local matching funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom herby authorizes the Police Department to apply for a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program offered by the California Highway Patrol which will provide funding to conduct selective traffic enforcement geared at reducing the number of fatal and injury collisions in the City and provide funding for additional traffic enforcement vehicles.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2026, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

__________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.8.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11551 A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant O ffered by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Distracted Driving, Seat Belt Enforcement, and Purchase of Police Vehicles

FROM: Police Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11551 – A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to apply for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant Program Offered by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Distracted Driving, Seat Belt Enforcement, and Purchase of Police Vehicles.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Enhancing Road Safety Through Proactive Measures
From 2020 to 2024, Folsom experienced collisions involving impaired drivers, resulting in injuries and fatalities. However, in 2025, thanks to grant-funded proactive saturation patrols and DUI checkpoints, the city saw a 66% decrease in DUI-related traffic collisions.

Officers conducted 212 arrests for driving under the influence during patrol operations and dedicated enforcement efforts. These efforts are part of a broader commitment to ensuring our streets are safe for everyone.

In 2025, Folsom experienced 1,534 vehicle collisions, resulting in 549 investigations, 328 people injured and 6 fatalities. In addition to DUI related collisions, unsafe speed continues to represent the highest primary collision factor in these cases, and in 2025, 1,256 citations

02/10/2026 Item No.9.
2 were issued for speed. Furthermore, distracted driving continued to present safety concerns in Folsom, and in 2025, 192 citations were issued for distracted driving. These efforts are part of a broader commitment to ensuring our streets are safe for everyone.

Securing Funding for Future Initiatives
To further these safety goals, the Folsom Police Department intends to apply for a State of California grant from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). This funding is crucial and will be used for:
• DUI checkpoints and other enforcement activities
• Pedestrian and bicycle enforcement
• Motorcycle safety enforcement
• Traffic safety educational presentations to promote safe driving • The acquisition of two new police motorcycles
This grant will allow the police department to continue its proactive approach to road safety, building on the progress already made and ensuring Folsom remains a safe community.

POLICY / RULE

City Council Resolution 8367 states that grant applications, including any requiring an ongoing commitment of resources or staff, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to submittal.

ANALYSIS

Law Enforcement grants provide financial assistance to allied agencies for the education, prevention, and the enforcement of laws related to dangerous driving, including speeding, distracted driving and driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs. The intent of these programs is to educate the public and enforcement of driving laws on the roadway, to improve the Organization/Agency’s effectiveness through training and development of new strategies. Each of these action items will help reduce the number of vehicle collisions.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The State of California through the Office of Traffic Safety is offering the grant with no local matching funds required. If awarded, staff will return to request the City Council authorize the City Manager to accept the grant award, and also request an increase in revenue estimates and appropriations in the General Grant Fund (Fund 012). Costs would be funded initially through the General Grant Fund (Fund 012) and reimbursed by the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety.

02/10/2026 Item No.9.
3 ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 11551 – A Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Apply for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant offered by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to Reduce and Mitigate the Impacts of Impaired Driving, Distracted Driving, Seat Belt Enforcement, and Purchase of Police Vehicles.

Submitted,

Adam Green, Chief of Police

02/10/2026 Item No.9.

Resolution No. 11551

RESOLUTION NO. 11551

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR A

SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) GRANT OFFERED BY THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) TO REDUCE AND

MITIGATE THE IMPACTS OF IMPAIRED DRIVING, DISTRACTED DRIVING, S EAT

BELT ENFORCEMENT, AND PURCHASE OF POLICE VEHICLES

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom Police Department is requesting the City Council authorize the Police Department to apply for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant for the Period of October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027, from the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety; and,
WHEREAS, selective enforcement of the primary causes of collisions are an effective way to deter motorists would speed, drive while under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, drive while distracted, or otherwise drive unsafe, thereby reducing fatal and injury collisions; and, WHEREAS, the grant monies will be used to reimburse personnel overtime costs associated with selective traffic enforcement and the training of officers in the detection, apprehension and prosecution of impaired drivers; and,
WHEREAS, the grant monies will be used to conduct community outreach programs through educational presentations and campaigns; and,
WHEREAS, the grant monies will be used to purchase police motorcycles, including communication radios and associated emergency equipment; and, WHEREAS, the grant monies require no local matching funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby authorizes the Police Department to apply for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant from the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), which will provide funding to conduct selective traffic enforcement geared at reducing the number of fatal and injury collisions in the City and additional traffic vehicles.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2026, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

__________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.9.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Old Business
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11543 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Approve an Additional Contingency in the Amount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 24-052) with Euro Style
Management for the Construction of the Tower Tank
Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

FROM: Utilities Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Utilities Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11543 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Approve an Additional Contingency in the Amount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Agreement (Contract No. 174- 21 24- 052) with Euro Style Management for the Construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The Utilities Department identifies water infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water master plans, ongoing water condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. Through these efforts, portions of the water system have been identified as needing rehabilitation or replacement in order to improve the reliability of the water distribution system.

These efforts led to the Utilities Department identifying the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project as a priority project.

The Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project involves improvements and repairs to five of the City’s water storage tanks due to aging infrastructure. The water tanks being rehabilitated include Tower Tank, Foothills Tanks No. 1 and No. 2, South Tank, and East Tank No. 2. The work at all five

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
2 tanks was scheduled to occur during the low water demand periods (October through April) as identified below:

 East Tank No. 2 - Completed (Fiscal Year 2024-25)
 South Tank - Completed (Fiscal Year 2024-25)
 Tower Tank – Out of service for construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)  Foothills Tank No. 1 – In Service and Awaiting Construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)  Foothills Tank No. 2 – Out of service for Construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)

During construction, multiple unforeseen conditions occurred at East Tank No. 2, Tower Tank, and Foothills Tank No. 2. The majority of the unforeseen conditions were related to structural deficiencies and their associated improvements. Structural deficiencies could only be identified once each of the tanks was taken offline and drained, and 30-foot-tall scaffolding erected to allow a licensed structural engineer to perform condition assessment of roof rafters, beams, girders, and connection plates. Photos of the condition of various structural components for each of the tanks listed above can be seen in Attachment No. 3. The project has also been impacted by site constraints, utilities, electrical improvements, property owner constraints, rock removal and other ancillary items.

Foothills Tank No. 1 was originally scheduled to be completed in the Spring of 2026, but due to the other deficiencies identified at Foothills Tank No. 2, this work is now proposed to be completed later this year. The City has not been able to inspect Foothills Tank No. 1 because this tank needs to remain in-service to meet water demand s while other tanks are out of service . Since Foothills Tank No. 1 is two years older than Foothills Tank No. 2, the project team anticipates that the additional unforeseen structural rehabilitation work at Foothills Tank No. 1 will be similar to that identified at Foothills Tank No. 2.

The additional work identified at each tank location is impacting both the project completion schedule and costs. The authorized contingency of 15% approved by City Council through Resolution No. 11246 will be exceeded and additional contingency will be required.

This Resolution will authorize the City Manager to approve an additional contingency in the amount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Agreement (Contract No. 174- 21 24- 052) with Euro Style Management for the construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA 2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

POLICY / RULE

Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $77,426 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

ANALYSIS

During construction upgrades of East Tank, Tower Tank and Foothills Tank No. 2, additional work has been identified that will exceed the authorized contingency of 15% approved by City Council

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
3 through Resolution No. 11246. The majority of the unforeseen conditions are related to structural deficiencies and the necessary improvements to fix these deficiencies to extend the serviceable life of each of the tanks . O ther impacts such as site constraints, utilities, electrical improvements, property owner constraints, rock removal and other ancillary items , including the cost impact to the overall project, are listed below by tank.

East Tank No. 2 (total approximate extra cost of $20,000)

 Interior overflow structure modifications (approximate extra cost of $12,500).  Rock removal during trenching with inadequate site access for industry standard rock removal equipment (approximately extra cost of $6,200).  Flushing connection modifications (approximate extra cost of $500).

Tower Tank (total approximate extra cost of $500,000)

 Site constraints, utility and property owner constraints, as well as additional SMUD requirements for installing permanent power to the Tower Tank site during construction (anticipated not-to-exceed cost is $250,000).
 Structural Modifications (approximate extra cost of $223,000). o Replacement of additional 23 rafters (approximate extra cost of $200,000). o Removal of 282 flat bars (approximate extra cost of $43,000). o Removal of Bid Item No. 12 - Replacement of twenty (20) rafter braces (approximate credit of $69,000).
o Install 439 rafter braces (approximate extra cost of $380,000).  Due to the significant difference in bid quantity versus actual quantity during construction, Bid Item No. 12 was renegotiated at a lower cost per the City’s General Provisions.
o Due to the change in character of work and schedule constraints for placing the tank back in service to meet water demands and maintain water reliability, Bid Item No. 13 was renegotiated as identified below:
 Deletion of seal welding and required materials ( approximate credit of $360,000).
 Installation of interior roof joint sealing material (approximate extra cost of $21,000).
o Straightening of the northside W16 Girder (approximate extra cost of $8,000).  Other anticipated ancillary work such as rock removal, tank electrical, etc. (approximate extra cost of $27,000).

Foothills Tank No. 2 (total approximate extra cost of $1,450,000)

 Replacement of 60 of 64 outer rafters (94%) (approximate extra cost of $496,800).  Replacement of 21 of 32 inner rafters (66%) (approximate extra cost of $126,000).  Blasting and Coating all steel above the water-line (approximate extra cost of $252,000).  Installation of 376 braces (approximate extra cost of $300,800).  Rehabilitation of 6 of the 7 girders (approximate extra cost of $21,000).  Replace center cone support with halo (approximate extra cost of $59,600).

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
4  Full dance floor scaffolding (approximate extra cost of $130,000).  Interior spot repair below the waterline (approximate extra cost of $30,000).  Other ancillary work (approximate extra cost of $33,800).

Rehabilitation work on East Tank and South Tank was completed in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Tower Tank and Foothills Tank No. 2 are currently out of service for construction, and Foothills Tank No. 1 is in service awaiting construction and the completion of work at Foothills Tank No. 2. As work on the tanks cannot be performed during the summer months due to peak water demands, the contract documents require the contractor to complete work on Foothills Tank No. 1 and Foothills Tank No. 2 by April 15, 2026, and T ower Tank by May 1, 2026. Due to the amount of extra work recommended by the structural engineer to maintain the structural integrity of the tanks, the contractor will not able to meet the deadline for Foothills Tank No. 1 by April 15, 2026 and will need to return during the next low demand water period starting on October 16, 2026 to complete the work for Foothills Tank No. 1.

Given that Foothills Tank No. 1 is two years older than Foothills Tank No. 2, the project team anticipates that additional unforeseen rehabilitation work and associated costs for Foothills Tank No. 1 will be similar or more than that required for Foothills Tank No. 2. City staff have outlined the cost impacts below:

Foothills Tank No. 1 (total approximate extra cost of $1,550,000)

 Anticipate replacement of 64 of 64 outer rafter s (100%) (approximate extra cost of $529,920).
 Anticipate replacement of 26 of 32 inner rafter s (81%) (approximate extra cost of $156,000).
 Anticipate blasting and c oating all steel above the water -line (approximate extra cost of $252,000).
 Anticipate installing 376 braces (approximate extra cost of $300,800).  Anticipate rehabilitating all 7 girders (approximate extra cost of $25,000).  Replace center cone support with halo (approximate extra cost of $59,600).  Full dance floor scaffolding (approximate extra cost of $130,000).  Interior spot repair below the waterline (approximate extra cost of $30,000).  Interior/Exterior overflow modification (approximate extra cost of $21,760).  Exterior center vent rehabilitation (approximate extra cost of $25,000).  Other ancillary work (approximate extra cost of $19,920).

The additional unforeseen rehabilitation work already identified on Foothills Tank No.2, East Tank No. 2, and Tower Tank totals approximately $1, 970,000 which exceeds the 15% contingency of $716,550 authorized by City Council through Res olution No. 11246. It is estimated that an additional contingency in the amount of $1,550,000 will be required to complete work on Foothills Tank No. 1 for a total change in extra work amount of $3,520,000 above the original contract amount of $4,777,000 that was approved by City Council on August 27, 2024, through Resolution No. 11246.

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
5 City staff is r equesting authorization for approval of an additional contingency for the project in the amount of $2,803,450 above the original $716,550 contingency funds approved by City Council for a revised not-to-exceed contingency amount of $3,520,000.

This Resolution will authorize the City Manager to approve an additional contingency in the amount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Agreement (Contract No. 174- 21 24- 052) with Euro Style Management for the construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA 2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

On August 27
th, 2024, through Resolution No. 11246, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with Euro Style Management for the construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (WA 2402) in the amount of $4,777,000 with a total project budget for this agreement in the amount of $5,493,550 which included a 15% contingency in the amount of $716,550.

The Utilities Department recommends that the contingency amount budgeted for this agreement be increased by an additional $2,803,450 above the original $716,550 for a new total contingency in the amount of $3,520,000. This request will result in a new total not- to-exceed construction budget in the amount of $8,297,000.

Project costs expended and encumbered to date include design, advertisement, Community Department Building permit fees, construction administration services, construction management services, inspection services and construction, totaling approximately $6,573,657. An appropriation is therefore needed for additional construction costs, and staff is requesting an appropriation of $2,803,450 in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for an updated total project budget of $9,377,107. Sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the appropriation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 – California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 – Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 – Categorical Exceptions, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11543 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to A pprove an Additional Contingency in the A mount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 24-052) with Euro Style Management for the C onstruction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA 2402) and Appropriation of Funds

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
6 2. Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project Map

3. Water Storage Tank Photos

4. Structural Inspection Reports (Tower Tank and Foothills Tank No. 2)

Submitted,

Marcus Yasutake, Director

UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Attachment 1

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Resolution No. 11543

RESOLUTION NO. 11543

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE AN ADDITIONAL CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,803,450 FROM THE WATER OPERATING FUND (FUND 520) FOR THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 174-21 24-052) WITH EURO STYLE MANAGEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT WA2402) AND

APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water distribution system; and

WHEREAS, the rehabilitation work identified to enhance the City’s water distribution system and to continue to provide reliable water service to the City includes rehabilitating Tower Tank, Foothills Tanks No. 1 and No. 2, South Tank, and East Tank No. 2; and

WHEREAS, on August 27, 2024, through Resolution No. 11246, the City Council approved awarding a contract to Euro Style Management in the amount of $4,777,000 with the budgeted amount to include a 15% contingency of $716,550 for a total not -to-exceed amount of $5,493,550 for the construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds; and

WHEREAS, the Utilities Department is requesting authorization for approval of an additional contingency for the project in the amount of $2,803,450 above the original $716,550 contingency funds approved by City Council for a revised not -to-exceed contingency amount of $3,520,000; and

WHEREAS, this request will increase the construction budget by $2,803,450 for a total not-to-exceed construction budget in the amount of $8,297,000; and

WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520), however an appropriation in the amount of $2,803,450 is needed for the project, increasing the overall project budget from $6,573,657 to $9,377,107; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to approve an additional contingency in the amount of $2,803,450 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the agreement with Euro Style Management for the construction of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds for an amount of $2,803,450 for a total not-to-exceed construction budget of $8,297,000; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $2,803,450 for this agreement. The appropriation will be from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) fund balance in the amount of $2,803,450.

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Resolution No. 11543

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Attachment 2

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

ATTACHMENT 2

TOWER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT MAP

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Attachment 3

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

ATTACHMENT 3

WATER STORAGE TANK PHOTOS

1. Photo No. 1 – Tower Tank steel rafter cantilever leg bottom showing bottom flange deterioration, corrosion and paint coating failure

2. Photo No. 2 – Tower Tank steel rafter top flange deterioration and corrosion (top flange compromised for length of orange paint shown along the web of the steel I-beam)

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

3. Photo No. 3 – Tower Tank steel rafter after removal from Tower Tank showing top flange corrosion and loss of steel material

4. Photo No. 4 – Foothills No. 2 south-east steel girder bottom flange damage and loss of material (4-Ft in length)

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

5. Photo No. 5 – Foothills No. 2 northern steel girder bottom flange showing deterioration, corrosion and loss of steel material

6. Photo No. 6 – Foothills No. 2 – steel rafter bottom flange deterioration and corrosion (various locations)

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

7. Photo No. 7 – Foothills Tank No. 2 rafter end at crows nest (center support) showing loss of coating, corrosion and loss of steel material

8. Photo No. 8 – Significant rafter deterioration and loss of material showing pitting and corrosion and loss of paint coating.

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

9. Photo No. 9 – Foothills Tank No. 1 rafter bottom flange corrosion

10. Photo No. 10 – Foothills Tank No. 1 roof vent corrosion and loss of steel material

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Attachment 4

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

PO Box 2592 • Carmichael, CA 95609-2592 • e-mail: [email protected] Construction observation services are for the purpose of providing project administration, observation and investigation of specific aspects of the project. They do not relieve the contractor of its responsibilities of performing the work in accordance with the plans and specifications. They do not include supervision or direction of the means, methods or actual work of the contractor or responsibility for jobsite safety.

Construction Observation Log

To: JP Davis
From: Brad Friederichs
Date: 12/15/2025
Project: Folsom Tower Tank Rehabilitation

Present: Alex (GC), Jesse (WYA)
Project No.: 24001

Project Status:

Observe blasted areas of corroded areas on beams. Prepare a count and mark damaged beams.

Directions:

1. 46 beams in the outer ring and 9 beams in the inner ring are damaged and need to be replaced.

2. Remove all existing flat strap bracing including grinding and removing welded piece on top of the flange at existing beams to remain.

3. All beams including existing beams to have ¾” diameter rod bracing at 6 ft cc max on each side of the beam. Weld the rod to the beam web with a butt weld. Rod to be placed no more than 1” below the top flange.

4. The beams framing into the center column are severely corroded. Repair involves design and construction of a new 7 ft diameter center cone detail as stated in plan detail 4/S300. This is a design-build item. The contractor will design a new cone and submit details for review.

5. The seams of the roof plates overlap approximately 2”. In some areas, the overlapped plates have spread due to layup issues during construction or the pressure of corrosion in the joint. For all joints, clean surfaces and paint inside the joint as much as possible. Apply Sika 1A in lieu of seam welding to any remaining gap. This does not negatively impact the structural integrity of the tank roof.

6. The existing W16 girder on the north side of the tank is twisted on one end. Disconnect the roof beams (provide temporary support) and straighten the beam as much as is feasible. Install ¼” plate stiffeners at the end. Reattach the roof beams to the girder by bolting or welding.

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Where Value and Engineering Come Together
PO Box 2592 Carmichael, CA 95609-2592
(916) 505.0519 • [email protected]
January 18, 2026
Mr. JP Davis
West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Foothills Tank No. 2 – Detailed Roof Structural Inspection Report

PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This report presents the findings of a comprehensive structural inspection conducted on January 16, 2026, to evaluate the condition of the roof framing system for Foothills Tank No. 2 in Folsom, California. The inspection focused on assessing the extent and severity of corrosion damage to structural steel members and identifying necessary repairs to maintain the structural integrity in accordance with the California Building Code.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The tank roof structure consists of a radial beam and circumferential girder support system with a central steel cone support (commonly referred to as a "crows nest"). The structural configuration includes:
• 32 radial W8×10 steel beams at the inner radius
• 64 radial W8×10 steel beams at the outer radius
• 7 circumferential W16×26 steel girders providing support • Central inverted plate steel cone column supported structure

INSPECTION FINDINGS

1. Radial Beams (W8×10)
Significant corrosion damage was observed on a substantial number of the radial beams. A total of approximately 61 beams exhibit deterioration beyond economical repair and require complete replacement:
• 19 of 32 beams at the inner ring (59%)
• 42 of 64 beams at the outer ring (66%)
The corrosion pattern and paint failure characteristics suggest the deterioration resulted from inadequate surface preparation and/or inappropriate coating materials during the original construction. Evidence indicates the following contributing factors:
• Insufficient mechanical preparation (cleaning/abrasion) of steel surfaces prior to coating

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
2 | Page

• Poor adhesion between primer and steel substrate, evidenced by widespread delamination
• Potential use of water-based primer incompatible with the service environment The flanges show the most severe section loss, compromising the beams' flexural capacity. Photographic documentation (see attached images) clearly shows advanced corrosion with significant metal loss on the flanges.

Recommendation: Replace all 61 deteriorated beams with new W8×10 sections.

Ensure proper surface preparation per SSPC-SP standards and specify appropriate coating systems for potable water tank interiors. Paint all new and existing structural steel and roof plates above the water line.

Additional Structural Deficiency: The existing lateral bracing configuration for the top (compression) flanges is inadequate. Currently, only one top flange brace per beam provides support at approximately 16-foot spacing, which exceeds recommended limits for compression flange stability. This deficiency increases the risk of lateral-torsional buckling under design loads.

Recommendation: Install ¾-inch diameter steel rod bracing at 6-foot centers near the top flanges, similar to the bracing configuration implemented at Tower Tank.

This modification will provide adequate lateral support in accordance with the CBC.

2. Circumferential Girders (W16×26)
Six of the seven W16×26 circumferential girders exhibit localized corrosion damage requiring structural repair (see attached images). The majority of deterioration occurs on the bottom (tension) flanges, with the damage concentrated in discrete areas rather than distributed along the full member length.

Repair Strategy: Cover plate reinforcement provides the most practical and economical solution for restoring the lost section capacity. The specific repair requirements vary based on damage location relative to the support points:

For damage located within the outer quarter-points of the span (areas of high shear, lower moment):
• Repair required when flange area loss exceeds 20%
• Install 3/8-inch × 6-inch steel cover plates
• Extend plates minimum 12 inches beyond damaged area each direction • Fillet weld plates to both sides of bottom flange and across the end per AWS D1.1 standards
For damage located in the middle half of the span (area of maximum moment):
• Repair required when flange area loss exceeds 5%
• Install 3/8-inch × 6-inch steel cover plates using same detailing as above These repair thresholds are based on CBC provisions for section loss and ensure adequate structural capacity with appropriate safety factors maintained.

3. Center Column Support System
Multiple beam webs at the central support exhibit corrosion damage requiring reinforcement (see attached images). Many of these deficiencies will be addressed through the replacement of deteriorated radial beams as previously described. For beams being retained in place with damaged web connections, vertical stiffener plates will be required to restore shear transfer capacity at the support.

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
3 | Page

Design Deficiency: The existing "crows nest" center support consists of an inverted plate steel cone structure positioned directly below the roof vent opening. It is supported by a single steel column. This configuration creates a significant operational problem: the enclosed cone limits adequate air circulation into and out of the tank interior. Limited air exchange occurs only through the narrow gaps between radial beams, resulting in poor ventilation that likely contributed to the accelerated corrosion observed throughout the structure.

Optional Recommendation: Replace the existing solid cone structure with an open "halo beam" support system (see attached images). This would consist of a circular steel beam supported by radial columns, allowing unrestricted air flow while maintaining equivalent structural support for the radial beams. This modification will:
• Significantly improve air circulation and ventilation • Reduce moisture accumulation on steel surfaces
• Extend the service life of protective coatings
• Minimize future corrosion and maintenance requirements

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The inspection has identified substantial structural deterioration requiring comprehensive repair to maintain in order for the structure to comply with the CBC. The primary findings and recommended actions include:

1. Replace 61 corroded radial beams (19 inner ring, 42 outer ring) with new W8×10 sections

2. Install supplemental top flange bracing at 6-foot centers on all radial beams

3. Repair six deteriorated circumferential girders using welded cover plates

4. Reinforce corroded beam web connections at center support with vertical stiffeners

5. Optional: Replace solid cone center support with open halo beam system to improve ventilation
If the City elects to proceed with these repairs, VE Solutions Inc. will prepare details showing proper installation procedures, material requirements, welding details, and quality control provisions. The work that involves replacement in-kind will not be detailed but only stated in a document. These documents will provide the contractor with clear technical direction to execute the work in accordance with the CBC.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding these findings or require additional information to support project planning and budgeting decisions.

Sincerely yours,

Brad Friederichs, P.E.

California License No. S2780
Attachments: Photographic documentation of observed conditions

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
4 | Page

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
1/16/2026

W8x10 Beam Deterioration

W8x10 Top Flange Corrosion Paint Showing Primer Debonded from Steel

02/10/2026 Item No.10.
5 | Page

W16x26 Girder Flange Corrosion W8 Beam at Center Support

New Halo Type Support

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Where Value and Engineering Come Together
PO Box 2592 Carmichael, CA 95609-2592
(916) 505.0519 • [email protected]
February 3, 2026
Mr. JP Davis
West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Foothills Tank No. 2 – Supplemental Roof Structural Inspection Report

SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION FINDINGS
On January 31,2026 it was requested that I do another inspection since the contractor had installed scaffolding inside the tank and was able to sand blast the areas that we previously observed from a distance. As well the sand blasting removed paint that was restricting observation of the corrosion damage to the beams. The additional blasting revealed more extensive corrosion of the structural roof beams in comparison to what was seen on previous site visit.

As a result, a total of 81 beams W8 roof beams exhibit deterioration that is beyond economical repair and require complete replacement:

The total beam replacement is:
• 21 of 32 beams at the inner ring (66%)
• 60 of 64 beams at the inner ring (94%)

The damaged beams to be replaced have been marked with green tape.

All of the other recommendations of the previous report are in effect and still valid.

Sincerely yours,

Brad Friederichs, P.E.

California License No. S2780

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

02/10/2026 Item No.10.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Old Business
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11544 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
(Contract No. 173-21 24-039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for $583,399 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

FROM: Utilities Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Utilities Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11544 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24-039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for $583,399 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The Utilities Department identifies water infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water master plans, ongoing water condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. Through these efforts, portions of the water system have been identified as needing rehabilitation or replacement in order to improve the reliability of the water distribution system.

These efforts led to the Utilities Department identifying the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project as a priority project.

The Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project involves improvements and repairs to five of the City’s water storage tanks due to aging infrastructure. The water tanks being rehabilitated include Tower Tank, Foothills Tanks No. 1 and No. 2, South Tank, and East Ta nk No. 2. The work at all five

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
2 tanks was scheduled to occur during the low water demand periods (October through April) as identified below:

 East Tank No. 2 – Completed (Fiscal Year 2024-25)
 South Tank – Completed (Fiscal Year 2024-25)
 Tower Tank – Out of service for construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)  Foothills Tank No. 1 – In Service and Awaiting Construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)  Foothills Tank No. 2 – Out of service for Construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)

During construction, multiple unforeseen conditions occurred at East Tank No. 2, Tower Tank, and Foothills Tank No. 2. The majority of the unforeseen conditions were related to structural deficiencies and their associated improvements. Structural deficiencies could only be identified once each of the tanks was taken offline and drained, and 30-foot-tall scaffolding erected to allow a licensed structural engineer to perform condition assessment of roof rafters, beams, girders, and connection plates. Photos of the condition of various structural components for each of the tanks listed above can be seen in Attachment No. 3. The project has also been impacted by site constraints, utilities, electrical improvements, property owner constraints, rock removal, and other ancillary items.

Foothills Tank No. 1 was originally scheduled to be completed in the Spring of 2026, but due to the other deficiencies identified at Foothills Tank No. 2, this work is now proposed to be completed later this year. The City has not been able to inspect Foothills Tank No. 1 because this tank needs to remain in-service to meet water demands while other tanks are out of service. Since Foothills Tank No. 1 is two years older than Foothills Tank No. 2, the project team anticipates that the additional unforeseen structural rehabilitation work at Foothills Tank No. 1 will be similar to that identified at Foothills Tank No. 2.

Additional effort by West Yost & Associates , Inc. related to construction management and inspection services as identified in Amendment No. 1 includes project coordination, project management, and additional construction inspection for Tower Tank, Foothills Tank No. 1, and Foothills Tank No. 2.

This Resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24-039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for $ 583,399 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for additional construction management and inspection services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

POLICY / RULE

Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value or $77,426 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
3 ANALYSIS

In October 2024, the City of Folsom entered into an agreement with West Yost & Associates, Inc. to provide construction management and inspection services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $549,734. This initial work included project management during construction, inspection services, submittal management, responses to Requests for Information (RFI), construction meetings, progress payment reviews, etc. West Yost & Associates, Inc. is currently providing construction management and inspection services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project.

Due to the various unforeseen site conditions as described in the Background Section, the schedule for construction management and inspection services will need to be extended from April 2026 to January 2027. Additional construction management and inspection services recommended to be provided by West Yost & Associates, Inc. as part of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project include the following:

- Project management and resident engineer services:
o Coordination of additional submittals and Requests for Information (RFIs). o Coordination of additional Construction Change Directives (CCD) and Change Orders.
- Construction inspection including overtime and weekend work for additional improvements to Tower Tank (to be completed by May 1, 2026) and Foothills Tank No. 2 (to be completed by April 15, 2026).
- Construction inspection for improvements to Foothills Tank No. 1 (to be completed by January 2027).
- Special inspections for coatings and welding.
- Structural inspection for Foothills Tank No. 1.
- Coordination and construction inspection for SMUD electrical improvements at Tower Tank.
- Preparation of Tank Reports to comply with State regulations.

The total cost to provide additional construction management and inspection services by West Yost & Associates , Inc. as part of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project is $ 583,399. This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 039) with West Yost & Associates , Inc. for additional construction management and inspection services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project for a new not -to- exceed amount of $1,045,565 and appropriation of funds.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The City Council approved Resolution No. 11243 on August 27, 2024 in the amount of $549,734 for construction management and inspection services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (WA2402).

The Utilities Department recommends that Amendment No. 1 to the agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24-039) for additional Construction Management and Inspection Services be executed with

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
4 West Yost & Associates, Inc. for an additional $583,399 for a new not-to-exceed contract total of $1,133,133. The project budget will require an appropriation in the amount of $583,399 for this amendment. Assuming adoption of Resolution No. 11543 for an Additional Contingency for the Agreement (Contract No. 174- 21 24-052) with Euro Style Management for construction on the same project (WA2402), which is being presented to City Council at the same meeting on February 10, 2026, this will bring the total project budget from $9,377,107 to $9,960,506. Sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the appropriation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 – California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 – Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 – Categorical Exceptions, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11544 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for $583,399 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

2. Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project Map

3. Water Storage Tank Photos

4. Structural Inspection Reports (Tower Tank and Foothills Tank No. 2)

Submitted,

Marcus Yasutake, Director

UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Attachment 1

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Resolution No. 11544

RESOLUTION NO. 11544

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-21 24-039) WITH WEST YOST & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR $583,399 FROM THE WATER OPERATING FUND (FUND 520) FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND

INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE TOWER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT WA2402) AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water distribution system; and

WHEREAS, the rehabilitation work identified to enhance the City’s water distribution system and to continue to provide reliable water service to the City includes rehabilitating Tower Tank, Foothills Tanks No. 1 and No. 2, South Tank, and East Tank No. 2; and

WHEREAS, West Yost & Associates, Inc. by reason of their experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required additional construction management and inspection services for this project; and

WHEREAS, assuming adoption of Resolution No. 11543 for an additional contingency for the Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 24-052) with Euro Style Management for construction on the same project (WA2402) which is being presented to City Council at the same meeting on February 10, 2026, where the total project budget was increased from $6,573,657 to $9,377,107 ; and

WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of funds in the amount of $583,399 is needed for a revised project budget of $9,960,506 and sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for this appropriation; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for additional construction management and inspection services for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) in the amount of $583,399 and the new contract not-to-exceed amount, including Amendment No. 1 is $1,133,133.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $583,399 for this agreement. The appropriation will be from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) fund balance in the amount of $583,399.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10
th day of February, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Resolution No. 11544

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Attachment 2

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

ATTACHMENT 2

TOWER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT MAP

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Attachment 3

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

ATTACHMENT 3

WATER STORAGE TANK PHOTOS

1. Photo No. 1 – Tower Tank steel rafter cantilever leg bottom showing bottom flange deterioration, corrosion and paint coating failure

2. Photo No. 2 – Tower Tank steel rafter top flange deterioration and corrosion (top flange compromised for length of orange paint shown along the web of the steel I-beam)

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

3. Photo No. 3 – Tower Tank steel rafter after removal from Tower Tank showing top flange corrosion and loss of steel material

4. Photo No. 4 – Foothills No. 2 south-east steel girder bottom flange damage and loss of material (4-Ft in length)

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

5. Photo No. 5 – Foothills No. 2 northern steel girder bottom flange showing deterioration, corrosion and loss of steel material

6. Photo No. 6 – Foothills No. 2 – steel rafter bottom flange deterioration and corrosion (various locations)

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

7. Photo No. 7 – Foothills Tank No. 2 rafter end at crows nest (center support) showing loss of coating, corrosion and loss of steel material

8. Photo No. 8 – Significant rafter deterioration and loss of material showing pitting and corrosion and loss of paint coating.

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

9. Photo No. 9 – Foothills Tank No. 1 rafter bottom flange corrosion

10. Photo No. 10 – Foothills Tank No. 1 roof vent corrosion and loss of steel material

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Attachment 4

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

PO Box 2592 • Carmichael, CA 95609-2592 • e-mail: [email protected] Construction observation services are for the purpose of providing project administration, observation and investigation of specific aspects of the project. They do not relieve the contractor of its responsibilities of performing the work in accordance with the plans and specifications. They do not include supervision or direction of the means, methods or actual work of the contractor or responsibility for jobsite safety.

Construction Observation Log

To: JP Davis
From: Brad Friederichs
Date: 12/15/2025
Project: Folsom Tower Tank Rehabilitation

Present: Alex (GC), Jesse (WYA)
Project No.: 24001

Project Status:

Observe blasted areas of corroded areas on beams. Prepare a count and mark damaged beams.

Directions:

1. 46 beams in the outer ring and 9 beams in the inner ring are damaged and need to be replaced.

2. Remove all existing flat strap bracing including grinding and removing welded piece on top of the flange at existing beams to remain.

3. All beams including existing beams to have ¾” diameter rod bracing at 6 ft cc max on each side of the beam. Weld the rod to the beam web with a butt weld. Rod to be placed no more than 1” below the top flange.

4. The beams framing into the center column are severely corroded. Repair involves design and construction of a new 7 ft diameter center cone detail as stated in plan detail 4/S300. This is a design-build item. The contractor will design a new cone and submit details for review.

5. The seams of the roof plates overlap approximately 2”. In some areas, the overlapped plates have spread due to layup issues during construction or the pressure of corrosion in the joint. For all joints, clean surfaces and paint inside the joint as much as possible. Apply Sika 1A in lieu of seam welding to any remaining gap. This does not negatively impact the structural integrity of the tank roof.

6. The existing W16 girder on the north side of the tank is twisted on one end. Disconnect the roof beams (provide temporary support) and straighten the beam as much as is feasible. Install ¼” plate stiffeners at the end. Reattach the roof beams to the girder by bolting or welding.

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Where Value and Engineering Come Together
PO Box 2592 Carmichael, CA 95609-2592
(916) 505.0519 • [email protected]
January 18, 2026
Mr. JP Davis
West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Foothills Tank No. 2 – Detailed Roof Structural Inspection Report

PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This report presents the findings of a comprehensive structural inspection conducted on January 16, 2026, to evaluate the condition of the roof framing system for Foothills Tank No. 2 in Folsom, California. The inspection focused on assessing the extent and severity of corrosion damage to structural steel members and identifying necessary repairs to maintain the structural integrity in accordance with the California Building Code.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The tank roof structure consists of a radial beam and circumferential girder support system with a central steel cone support (commonly referred to as a "crows nest"). The structural configuration includes:
• 32 radial W8×10 steel beams at the inner radius
• 64 radial W8×10 steel beams at the outer radius
• 7 circumferential W16×26 steel girders providing support • Central inverted plate steel cone column supported structure

INSPECTION FINDINGS

1. Radial Beams (W8×10)
Significant corrosion damage was observed on a substantial number of the radial beams. A total of approximately 61 beams exhibit deterioration beyond economical repair and require complete replacement:
• 19 of 32 beams at the inner ring (59%)
• 42 of 64 beams at the outer ring (66%)
The corrosion pattern and paint failure characteristics suggest the deterioration resulted from inadequate surface preparation and/or inappropriate coating materials during the original construction. Evidence indicates the following contributing factors:
• Insufficient mechanical preparation (cleaning/abrasion) of steel surfaces prior to coating

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
2 | Page

• Poor adhesion between primer and steel substrate, evidenced by widespread delamination
• Potential use of water-based primer incompatible with the service environment The flanges show the most severe section loss, compromising the beams' flexural capacity. Photographic documentation (see attached images) clearly shows advanced corrosion with significant metal loss on the flanges.

Recommendation: Replace all 61 deteriorated beams with new W8×10 sections.

Ensure proper surface preparation per SSPC-SP standards and specify appropriate coating systems for potable water tank interiors. Paint all new and existing structural steel and roof plates above the water line.

Additional Structural Deficiency: The existing lateral bracing configuration for the top (compression) flanges is inadequate. Currently, only one top flange brace per beam provides support at approximately 16-foot spacing, which exceeds recommended limits for compression flange stability. This deficiency increases the risk of lateral-torsional buckling under design loads.

Recommendation: Install ¾-inch diameter steel rod bracing at 6-foot centers near the top flanges, similar to the bracing configuration implemented at Tower Tank.

This modification will provide adequate lateral support in accordance with the CBC.

2. Circumferential Girders (W16×26)
Six of the seven W16×26 circumferential girders exhibit localized corrosion damage requiring structural repair (see attached images). The majority of deterioration occurs on the bottom (tension) flanges, with the damage concentrated in discrete areas rather than distributed along the full member length.

Repair Strategy: Cover plate reinforcement provides the most practical and economical solution for restoring the lost section capacity. The specific repair requirements vary based on damage location relative to the support points:

For damage located within the outer quarter-points of the span (areas of high shear, lower moment):
• Repair required when flange area loss exceeds 20%
• Install 3/8-inch × 6-inch steel cover plates
• Extend plates minimum 12 inches beyond damaged area each direction • Fillet weld plates to both sides of bottom flange and across the end per AWS D1.1 standards
For damage located in the middle half of the span (area of maximum moment):
• Repair required when flange area loss exceeds 5%
• Install 3/8-inch × 6-inch steel cover plates using same detailing as above These repair thresholds are based on CBC provisions for section loss and ensure adequate structural capacity with appropriate safety factors maintained.

3. Center Column Support System
Multiple beam webs at the central support exhibit corrosion damage requiring reinforcement (see attached images). Many of these deficiencies will be addressed through the replacement of deteriorated radial beams as previously described. For beams being retained in place with damaged web connections, vertical stiffener plates will be required to restore shear transfer capacity at the support.

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
3 | Page

Design Deficiency: The existing "crows nest" center support consists of an inverted plate steel cone structure positioned directly below the roof vent opening. It is supported by a single steel column. This configuration creates a significant operational problem: the enclosed cone limits adequate air circulation into and out of the tank interior. Limited air exchange occurs only through the narrow gaps between radial beams, resulting in poor ventilation that likely contributed to the accelerated corrosion observed throughout the structure.

Optional Recommendation: Replace the existing solid cone structure with an open "halo beam" support system (see attached images). This would consist of a circular steel beam supported by radial columns, allowing unrestricted air flow while maintaining equivalent structural support for the radial beams. This modification will:
• Significantly improve air circulation and ventilation • Reduce moisture accumulation on steel surfaces
• Extend the service life of protective coatings
• Minimize future corrosion and maintenance requirements

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The inspection has identified substantial structural deterioration requiring comprehensive repair to maintain in order for the structure to comply with the CBC. The primary findings and recommended actions include:

1. Replace 61 corroded radial beams (19 inner ring, 42 outer ring) with new W8×10 sections

2. Install supplemental top flange bracing at 6-foot centers on all radial beams

3. Repair six deteriorated circumferential girders using welded cover plates

4. Reinforce corroded beam web connections at center support with vertical stiffeners

5. Optional: Replace solid cone center support with open halo beam system to improve ventilation
If the City elects to proceed with these repairs, VE Solutions Inc. will prepare details showing proper installation procedures, material requirements, welding details, and quality control provisions. The work that involves replacement in-kind will not be detailed but only stated in a document. These documents will provide the contractor with clear technical direction to execute the work in accordance with the CBC.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding these findings or require additional information to support project planning and budgeting decisions.

Sincerely yours,

Brad Friederichs, P.E.

California License No. S2780
Attachments: Photographic documentation of observed conditions

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
4 | Page

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
1/16/2026

W8x10 Beam Deterioration

W8x10 Top Flange Corrosion Paint Showing Primer Debonded from Steel

02/10/2026 Item No.11.
5 | Page

W16x26 Girder Flange Corrosion W8 Beam at Center Support

New Halo Type Support

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Where Value and Engineering Come Together
PO Box 2592 Carmichael, CA 95609-2592
(916) 505.0519 • [email protected]
February 3, 2026
Mr. JP Davis
West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Foothills Tank No. 2 – Supplemental Roof Structural Inspection Report

SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION FINDINGS
On January 31,2026 it was requested that I do another inspection since the contractor had installed scaffolding inside the tank and was able to sand blast the areas that we previously observed from a distance. As well the sand blasting removed paint that was restricting observation of the corrosion damage to the beams. The additional blasting revealed more extensive corrosion of the structural roof beams in comparison to what was seen on previous site visit.

As a result, a total of 81 beams W8 roof beams exhibit deterioration that is beyond economical repair and require complete replacement:

The total beam replacement is:
• 21 of 32 beams at the inner ring (66%)
• 60 of 64 beams at the inner ring (94%)

The damaged beams to be replaced have been marked with green tape.

All of the other recommendations of the previous report are in effect and still valid.

Sincerely yours,

Brad Friederichs, P.E.

California License No. S2780

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

02/10/2026 Item No.11.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Old Business
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11545 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement
(Contract No. 173-21 24-006) with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for $84,000 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

FROM: Utilities Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Utilities Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11545 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 3 to the A greement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 006) with HydroS cience Engineers, Inc. for $ 84,000 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The Utilities Department identifies water infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water master plans, ongoing water condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. Through these efforts, portions of the water system have been identified as needing rehabilitation or replacement in order to improve the reliability of the water distribution system.

These efforts led to the Utilities Department identifying the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project as a priority project.

The Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project involves improvements and repairs to five of the City’s water storage tanks due to aging infrastructure. The water tanks being rehabilitated include Tower Tank, Foothills Tanks No. 1 and No. 2, South Tank, and East Tank No. 2. The work at all five

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
2 tanks was scheduled to occur during the low water demand periods (October through April) as identified below:

 East Tank No. 2 - Completed (Fiscal Year 2024-25)
 South Tank - Completed (Fiscal Year 2024-25)
 Tower Tank – Out of service for construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)  Foothills Tank No. 1 – In Service and Awaiting Construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)  Foothills Tank No. 2 – Out of service for Construction (Fiscal Year 2025-26)

During construction, multiple unforeseen conditions occurred at East Tank No. 2, Tower Tank, and Foothills Tank No. 2. The majority of the unforeseen conditions were related to structural deficiencies and their associated improvements. Structural deficiencies could only be identified once each of the tanks was taken offline and drained, and 30-foot-tall scaffolding erected to allow a licensed structural engineer to perform condition assessment of roof rafters, beams, girders, and connection plates. Photos of the condition of various structural components for each of the tanks listed above can be seen in Attachment No. 3. The project has also been impacted by site constraints, utilities, electrical improvements, property owner constraints, rock removal and other ancillary items.

Foothills Tank No. 1 was originally scheduled to be completed in the Spring of 2026, but due to the other deficiencies identified at Foothills Tank No. 2, this work is now proposed to be completed later this year. The City has not been able to inspect Foothills Tank No. 1 because this tank needs to remain in service to meet water demand s while other tanks are out of service . Since Foothills Tank No. 1 is two years older than Foothills Tank No. 2, the project team anticipates that the additional unforeseen structural rehabilitation work at Foothills Tank No. 1 will be similar to that identified at Foothills Tank No. 2.

Additional effort by HydroScience Engineers, Inc. associated with construction administration services related to submittal review, responding to Request s for Information (RFI’s), additional project management and progress meeting attendance has also been identified as part of Amendment No. 3 for this project.

This Resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 006) with HydroSc ience Engineers, Inc. for $84,000 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for additional design and engineering services during construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds.

POLICY / RULE

Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $77,426 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
3 ANALYSIS

Additional engineering services recommended to be provided by HydroScience Engineers, Inc. as part of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project include the following:

o Design modifications.
o Review of additional submittals and resubmittals.
o Review of additional Requests for Information (RFIs). o Additional project management.
o Attending additional progress meetings.
o Additional effort required to update as -built drawings upon completion of construction.

The total cost to provide additional engineering services by Hydr oscience Engineers, Inc. as part of the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project is $84,000. This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 006) with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for additional design and engineering services during construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project for a new not-to-exceed amount of $591,556 and appropriation of funds.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The City Council approved the following Resolutions for design and e ngineering services during construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402):

 Resolution No. 11167 on February 13, 2024 in the amount of $398,950  Resolution No. 11242 on August 27, 2024 for Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $70,844  Resolution No. 11470 on October 14, 2025 for Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $37,762

The Utilities Department recommends that Amendment No. 3 to the agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24-006) for additional Design and Engineering Services During Construction be executed with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for an additional $84,000 for a new not-to-exceed contract total of $591,556. This project budget will require an appropriation in the amount of $ 84,000 for this amendment.

Assuming adoption of Resolution No. 11543, for an Additional Contingency for the Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 24-052) with Euro Style Management for construction on the same project (WA2402), which is being presented to City Council at the same meeting on February 10, 2026, and assuming adoption of Resolution No. 11544 for Amendment No. 1 to the agreement (Contract No. 173-21 24-039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for work on the same project (WA2402), which is being presented to City Council at the same meeting on February 10, 2026, this will bring the total project budget from $9,960,506 to $10,044,506. Sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for the appropriation.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 – California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 – Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 – Categorical Exceptions, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11545 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 3 to the agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24 -006) with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for $84,000 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for Additional Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) and Appropriation of Funds

2. Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project Map

3. Water Storage Tank Photos

4. Structural Inspection Reports (Tower Tank and Foothills Tank No. 2)

Submitted,

Marcus Yasutake, Director

UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Attachment 1

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11545

RESOLUTION NO. 11545

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDEMNT NO. 3 TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-21 24-006) WITH HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS, INC. FOR $84,000 FROM THE WATER OPERATING FUND (FUND 520) FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE TOWER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT WA2402) AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water distribution system; and

WHEREAS, the rehabilitation work identified to enhance the City’s water distribution system and to continue to provide reliable water service to the City includes rehabilitating Tower Tank, Foothills Tanks No. 1 and No. 2, South Tank, and East Tank No. 2; and

WHEREAS, HydroScience Engineers, Inc. by reason of their experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required additional design and engineering services during construction for this project; and

WHEREAS, assuming adoption of Resolution No. 11543 for an additional contingency for the Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 24-052) with Euro Style Management for construction on the same project (WA2402) which is being presented to City Council at the same meeting on February 10, 2026, where the total project budget was increased from $6,573,657 to $9,377,107; and

WHEREAS, assuming adoption of Resolution No. 11544 for Amendment No. 1 to the agreement (Contract No. 173-21 24-039) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for work on the same project (WA2402), which is being presented to City Council at the same meeting on February 10, 2026, where the total project budget was increased from $9,377,107 to $9,960,506; and

WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of funds in the amount of $84,000 is needed for a revised project budget of $10,044,506 and sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for this appropriation; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 24- 006) with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for additional design and engineering services during construction for the Tower Tank Rehabilitation Project (Project WA2402) in the amount of $84,000 and the new contract not-to-exceed amount, including Amendment No. 3 is $591,556.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $84,000 for this agreement. The appropriation will be from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) fund balance in the amount of $84,000.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11545

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Attachment 2

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT 2

TOWER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT MAP

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Attachment 3

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT 3

WATER STORAGE TANK PHOTOS

1. Photo No. 1 – Tower Tank steel rafter cantilever leg bottom showing bottom flange deterioration, corrosion and paint coating failure

2. Photo No. 2 – Tower Tank steel rafter top flange deterioration and corrosion (top flange compromised for length of orange paint shown along the web of the steel I-beam)

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

3. Photo No. 3 – Tower Tank steel rafter after removal from Tower Tank showing top flange corrosion and loss of steel material

4. Photo No. 4 – Foothills No. 2 south-east steel girder bottom flange damage and loss of material (4-Ft in length)

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

5. Photo No. 5 – Foothills No. 2 northern steel girder bottom flange showing deterioration, corrosion and loss of steel material

6. Photo No. 6 – Foothills No. 2 – steel rafter bottom flange deterioration and corrosion (various locations)

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

7. Photo No. 7 – Foothills Tank No. 2 rafter end at crows nest (center support) showing loss of coating, corrosion and loss of steel material

8. Photo No. 8 – Significant rafter deterioration and loss of material showing pitting and corrosion and loss of paint coating.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

9. Photo No. 9 – Foothills Tank No. 1 rafter bottom flange corrosion

10. Photo No. 10 – Foothills Tank No. 1 roof vent corrosion and loss of steel material

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Attachment 4

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

PO Box 2592 • Carmichael, CA 95609-2592 • e-mail: [email protected] Construction observation services are for the purpose of providing project administration, observation and investigation of specific aspects of the project. They do not relieve the contractor of its responsibilities of performing the work in accordance with the plans and specifications. They do not include supervision or direction of the means, methods or actual work of the contractor or responsibility for jobsite safety.

Construction Observation Log

To: JP Davis
From: Brad Friederichs
Date: 12/15/2025
Project: Folsom Tower Tank Rehabilitation

Present: Alex (GC), Jesse (WYA)
Project No.: 24001

Project Status:

Observe blasted areas of corroded areas on beams. Prepare a count and mark damaged beams.

Directions:

1. 46 beams in the outer ring and 9 beams in the inner ring are damaged and need to be replaced.

2. Remove all existing flat strap bracing including grinding and removing welded piece on top of the flange at existing beams to remain.

3. All beams including existing beams to have ¾” diameter rod bracing at 6 ft cc max on each side of the beam. Weld the rod to the beam web with a butt weld. Rod to be placed no more than 1” below the top flange.

4. The beams framing into the center column are severely corroded. Repair involves design and construction of a new 7 ft diameter center cone detail as stated in plan detail 4/S300. This is a design-build item. The contractor will design a new cone and submit details for review.

5. The seams of the roof plates overlap approximately 2”. In some areas, the overlapped plates have spread due to layup issues during construction or the pressure of corrosion in the joint. For all joints, clean surfaces and paint inside the joint as much as possible. Apply Sika 1A in lieu of seam welding to any remaining gap. This does not negatively impact the structural integrity of the tank roof.

6. The existing W16 girder on the north side of the tank is twisted on one end. Disconnect the roof beams (provide temporary support) and straighten the beam as much as is feasible. Install ¼” plate stiffeners at the end. Reattach the roof beams to the girder by bolting or welding.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Where Value and Engineering Come Together
PO Box 2592 Carmichael, CA 95609-2592
(916) 505.0519 • [email protected]
January 18, 2026
Mr. JP Davis
West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Foothills Tank No. 2 – Detailed Roof Structural Inspection Report

PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This report presents the findings of a comprehensive structural inspection conducted on January 16, 2026, to evaluate the condition of the roof framing system for Foothills Tank No. 2 in Folsom, California. The inspection focused on assessing the extent and severity of corrosion damage to structural steel members and identifying necessary repairs to maintain the structural integrity in accordance with the California Building Code.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The tank roof structure consists of a radial beam and circumferential girder support system with a central steel cone support (commonly referred to as a "crows nest"). The structural configuration includes:
• 32 radial W8×10 steel beams at the inner radius
• 64 radial W8×10 steel beams at the outer radius
• 7 circumferential W16×26 steel girders providing support • Central inverted plate steel cone column supported structure

INSPECTION FINDINGS

1. Radial Beams (W8×10)
Significant corrosion damage was observed on a substantial number of the radial beams. A total of approximately 61 beams exhibit deterioration beyond economical repair and require complete replacement:
• 19 of 32 beams at the inner ring (59%)
• 42 of 64 beams at the outer ring (66%)
The corrosion pattern and paint failure characteristics suggest the deterioration resulted from inadequate surface preparation and/or inappropriate coating materials during the original construction. Evidence indicates the following contributing factors:
• Insufficient mechanical preparation (cleaning/abrasion) of steel surfaces prior to coating

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
2 | Page

• Poor adhesion between primer and steel substrate, evidenced by widespread delamination
• Potential use of water-based primer incompatible with the service environment The flanges show the most severe section loss, compromising the beams' flexural capacity. Photographic documentation (see attached images) clearly shows advanced corrosion with significant metal loss on the flanges.

Recommendation: Replace all 61 deteriorated beams with new W8×10 sections.

Ensure proper surface preparation per SSPC-SP standards and specify appropriate coating systems for potable water tank interiors. Paint all new and existing structural steel and roof plates above the water line.

Additional Structural Deficiency: The existing lateral bracing configuration for the top (compression) flanges is inadequate. Currently, only one top flange brace per beam provides support at approximately 16-foot spacing, which exceeds recommended limits for compression flange stability. This deficiency increases the risk of lateral-torsional buckling under design loads.

Recommendation: Install ¾-inch diameter steel rod bracing at 6-foot centers near the top flanges, similar to the bracing configuration implemented at Tower Tank.

This modification will provide adequate lateral support in accordance with the CBC.

2. Circumferential Girders (W16×26)
Six of the seven W16×26 circumferential girders exhibit localized corrosion damage requiring structural repair (see attached images). The majority of deterioration occurs on the bottom (tension) flanges, with the damage concentrated in discrete areas rather than distributed along the full member length.

Repair Strategy: Cover plate reinforcement provides the most practical and economical solution for restoring the lost section capacity. The specific repair requirements vary based on damage location relative to the support points:

For damage located within the outer quarter-points of the span (areas of high shear, lower moment):
• Repair required when flange area loss exceeds 20%
• Install 3/8-inch × 6-inch steel cover plates
• Extend plates minimum 12 inches beyond damaged area each direction • Fillet weld plates to both sides of bottom flange and across the end per AWS D1.1 standards
For damage located in the middle half of the span (area of maximum moment):
• Repair required when flange area loss exceeds 5%
• Install 3/8-inch × 6-inch steel cover plates using same detailing as above These repair thresholds are based on CBC provisions for section loss and ensure adequate structural capacity with appropriate safety factors maintained.

3. Center Column Support System
Multiple beam webs at the central support exhibit corrosion damage requiring reinforcement (see attached images). Many of these deficiencies will be addressed through the replacement of deteriorated radial beams as previously described. For beams being retained in place with damaged web connections, vertical stiffener plates will be required to restore shear transfer capacity at the support.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
3 | Page

Design Deficiency: The existing "crows nest" center support consists of an inverted plate steel cone structure positioned directly below the roof vent opening. It is supported by a single steel column. This configuration creates a significant operational problem: the enclosed cone limits adequate air circulation into and out of the tank interior. Limited air exchange occurs only through the narrow gaps between radial beams, resulting in poor ventilation that likely contributed to the accelerated corrosion observed throughout the structure.

Optional Recommendation: Replace the existing solid cone structure with an open "halo beam" support system (see attached images). This would consist of a circular steel beam supported by radial columns, allowing unrestricted air flow while maintaining equivalent structural support for the radial beams. This modification will:
• Significantly improve air circulation and ventilation • Reduce moisture accumulation on steel surfaces
• Extend the service life of protective coatings
• Minimize future corrosion and maintenance requirements

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The inspection has identified substantial structural deterioration requiring comprehensive repair to maintain in order for the structure to comply with the CBC. The primary findings and recommended actions include:

1. Replace 61 corroded radial beams (19 inner ring, 42 outer ring) with new W8×10 sections

2. Install supplemental top flange bracing at 6-foot centers on all radial beams

3. Repair six deteriorated circumferential girders using welded cover plates

4. Reinforce corroded beam web connections at center support with vertical stiffeners

5. Optional: Replace solid cone center support with open halo beam system to improve ventilation
If the City elects to proceed with these repairs, VE Solutions Inc. will prepare details showing proper installation procedures, material requirements, welding details, and quality control provisions. The work that involves replacement in-kind will not be detailed but only stated in a document. These documents will provide the contractor with clear technical direction to execute the work in accordance with the CBC.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding these findings or require additional information to support project planning and budgeting decisions.

Sincerely yours,

Brad Friederichs, P.E.

California License No. S2780
Attachments: Photographic documentation of observed conditions

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
4 | Page

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
1/16/2026

W8x10 Beam Deterioration

W8x10 Top Flange Corrosion Paint Showing Primer Debonded from Steel

02/10/2026 Item No.12.
5 | Page

W16x26 Girder Flange Corrosion W8 Beam at Center Support

New Halo Type Support

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Where Value and Engineering Come Together
PO Box 2592 Carmichael, CA 95609-2592
(916) 505.0519 • [email protected]
February 3, 2026
Mr. JP Davis
West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Foothills Tank No. 2 – Supplemental Roof Structural Inspection Report

SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION FINDINGS
On January 31,2026 it was requested that I do another inspection since the contractor had installed scaffolding inside the tank and was able to sand blast the areas that we previously observed from a distance. As well the sand blasting removed paint that was restricting observation of the corrosion damage to the beams. The additional blasting revealed more extensive corrosion of the structural roof beams in comparison to what was seen on previous site visit.

As a result, a total of 81 beams W8 roof beams exhibit deterioration that is beyond economical repair and require complete replacement:

The total beam replacement is:
• 21 of 32 beams at the inner ring (66%)
• 60 of 64 beams at the inner ring (94%)

The damaged beams to be replaced have been marked with green tape.

All of the other recommendations of the previous report are in effect and still valid.

Sincerely yours,

Brad Friederichs, P.E.

California License No. S2780

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

02/10/2026 Item No.12.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

2/10/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

Old Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11548 – A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineers Report, Declaring the Intention to Order the Formation of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025- 2, to Levy and Collect Assessments, to Provide Notice of Public Hearing and Direct the Mailing of Assessment Ballots Within the Proposed District in the City of Folsom

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No.11548 – A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineers Report, Declaring the Intention to Order the Formation of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2, to Levy and Collect Assessments, to Provide Notice of Public Hearing and Direct the Mailing of Assessment Ballots Within the Proposed District in the City of Folsom

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

On June 24, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 11403 - A Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Formation of a Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (“District”) to be known as the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025- 2. As part of the formation process, and in order to levy the a nnual assessment should the District be formed, an Engineer’s Report must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) and Article 4 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code).

The attached Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 202 6-2027 (Attachment 2) is submitted for City Council review and approval. Included within the report are the following:

02/10/2026 Item No.13.
2 A. Plans and specifications for the maintenance of the improvements.

B. Estimate of the cost of maintaining the improvements.

C. Diagram of the assessment District.

D. Assessment of the estimated costs for maintaining the improvements.

Under the provisions of Proposition 218, a public hearing must be held on the levy of new assessments at least 45 days after notice of the proposed assessment was mailed to record owners of each parcel in the new District. The attached resolution directs the mailing of such notice and sets the public hearing for April 28, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California 95630.

POLICY / RULE

The City Council is required to approve, or modify and approve, the Engineer’s Report as part of the formation process pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code § 22586). The City Council is required to adopt a resolution declaring the intention to form a new Landscaping and Lighting District and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to Section 22587 of the Streets and Highways Code.

Pursuant to Section 22605(d) of the Streets and Highways Code, the original Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District will be consolidated with the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2

Pursuant to Section 22611 of the Streets and Highways Code, all assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and installments of the original Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District shall be transferred to, and assumed by, the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025- 2 for the continued maintenance and servicing of the improvements.

ANALYSIS

The Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District was formed by Resolution No. 3024 on June 18, 1990, to maintain improvements within the District. These improvements include landscaping and associated improvements along Iron Point Road, Blue Ravine Roa d, Turnpike Drive, Black Diamond Drive, and Natoma Station Drive, as well as the subdivision’s streetlights, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, open space, monument entry signage, soundwalls, mini - parks, and art monuments. This District was formed pri or to Proposition 218 and, therefore, does not have an escalator built into the annual rate.

There are 1,272 single-family dwelling units within the District, and it is one of the older Districts in the city. In early 2025, the District pursued the Proposition 218 reassessment process; however, the resulting ballot measure did not receive suffici ent support, with voters opposing the assessment. The District is increasingly unable to keep pace with rising operational and maintenance costs, which have placed significant strain on its financial resources. The District maintains the aforementioned improvements along the frontages and medians of Iron Point Road, Blue Ravine Road, Turnpike Drive, Black Diamond Drive, and Natoma Station Drive. In addition

02/10/2026 Item No.13.
3 to maintaining these areas, the District is responsible for servicing costs for irrigation, water, and electricity to the street and landscape lights.

Revenue from the existing assessment (approximately $170,000 annually) is allocated yearly to maintain the District’s features. The existing per-unit rate of $91.70 has not been increased since it was established over 36 years ago. Approximately 37% of the budget currently covers scheduled and unscheduled landscape maintenance; 9% to streetlight maintenance and supplies; 23% to water and electricity; and 31% to incidental cost (non- landscape contract services, electrical repairs, vandalism response/repair s, hazard tree removal, sidewalk repair, yearly backflow testing, preparation of Engineer’s Reports, publications/mailings, staff, overhead, county auditor fee). The existing revenue from collected assessments has been unable to fund the expected day- to-day unscheduled costs, such as irrigation repairs and plant/tree replacements, as well as not being able to set aside funds for life-cycle costs in the District.

The primary objective of forming a new District to replace the existing District is to specifically provide the level of service originally intended, address deferred maintenance of the improvements within the District, plan for life -cycle replacements and repairs for years into the future, and provide for an annual inflationary adjustment as needed. Such deferred items include outdated and un-centralized irrigation systems, replacement of missing landscaping, addressing tree care, and implementing water conservation measures such as replacing dead/dying trees and shrubs with water-wise plantings and LED streetlight retrofits. Should the new Landscaping and Lighting District be formed, it is proposed to complete many of the deferred maintenance improvement s over the first few years, as well as embark on the phased replacement plan for the older landscape areas.

Staff conducted community outreach meetings on May 20, 2025, and May 28, 2025, to inform property owners of the results of the failed assessment and to solicit input regarding potential next steps, including interest in initiating a subsequent reassessment in accordance with Proposition 218. Based on feedback from community outreach meetings and subsequent communications, a majority of participating property owners supported pursuing another assessment effort. In response to this demonstrated interest, staf f initiated a reassessment process in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218 and applicable state law. As part of the process to form a new assessment District, staff initiated a public outreach program for the Natoma Station community with two public meetings that were held on January 22, 2026, and January 29, 2026. The intent of the meetings was to discuss the option proposed to address the District’s financial condition and develop a viable option that will ultimately be voted on and approved (or denied) by the property owners within the District. Staff presented an option for the District utilizing the trips method of apportionment. This proposal would create a new District that consolidates and replaces the existing District. This new Distr ict would cover the regular maintenance and servicing of the District assets, cover the deficit, address all deferred maintenance, and provide some enhancements. There was a thoughtful discussion to ensure those in attendance had their questions answered. As a result of these two public meetings, those in attendance were supportive of the proposed option for the District; as such, it will be the option to appear on the ballot for the entire community to vote on.

02/10/2026 Item No.13.
4 In addition, the City’s website includes information about the proposed assessment, and staff have spoken with numerous residents by phone and email about the proposed District. City staff have distributed information about the new District via mail, e -news, the City Website, and social media. Staff’s presentations for the community outreach meetings have been uploaded to the City’s website for community members who could not attend.

This report and resolution are being submitted for City Council review and approval. The preliminary Engineer’s Report is prepared in accordance with Proposition 218 and the Streets and Highways Code. It includes the following: plans and specifications, estimated costs and budgets, method of apportionment, the assessment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027, and the assessment diagram.

The property owners of Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District will be receiving a ballot to vote on the proposal to form a new assessment District in late February. The Public Hearing is set for April 28, 2026, which will provide the required 45- day period for the District property owners to consider the proposed assessment. At the public hearing, ballots will be counted and, in the absence of a majority protest against the imposition of a new assessment, the City Council may consider approving a resolution to approve the Final Engineer’s Report, form the District, and authorize the levy and collection of the new assessments. The proceeding for the formation of a new assessment District shall be abandoned if a majority protest exists.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The maximum assessment amount is calculated as the total cost of improvements, less the portion attributable to general benefit in accordance with Proposition 218. The general benefit of $53,617.44, determined to be 15.095% of total improvement costs, includes benefits to the broader community, including Sheldon Park and Mann Park. In addition to the funding for this general benefit portion, the City will contribute an additional $30,492.10 annually from the General Fund (Fund 010) to further offset general benefit costs associated with Sheldon Park and Mann Park.

The total maximum amount to be assessed in Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 is $527,371.40. The remaining costs of the District will be funded through the assessment and will directly benefit properties within the District boundaries.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The formation of a financing District, maintaining and servicing existing landscaping and lighting improvements, is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act. No environmental review is required.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11548 – A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineers Report, Declaring the Intention to Order the Formation of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025- 2, to Levy and Collect Assessments, to Provide Notice of Public Hearing and Direct the Mailing of Assessment Ballots Within the Proposed District in the City of Folsom

02/10/2026 Item No.13.
5 2. Preliminary Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2

3. Map of Assessment District- Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025- 2 Submitted,

Kelly Gonzalez, Director
Parks & Recreation Department

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Attachment 1

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11548

RESOLUTION NO. 11548

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT,

DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF THE NATOMA STATION MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2025-2, TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ASSESSMENTS, TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND

DIRECT THE MAILING OF ASSESSMENT BALLOTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED

DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF FOLSOM

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom proposes to establish a benefit assessment district known as the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2 (“District”), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code) (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and,

WHEREAS, the proposed District is established to provide for the levy and collection of assessments to pay the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements and facilities in the District that provide both direct and special benefits to the properties within the District; and,

WHEREAS, the procedures for the proposed assessment D istrict formation provides owners of property within the District with the opportunity to submit ballots for the proposed District formation and assessment levies that would fund the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the public improvements; and

WHEREAS, should the proposed new District be approved by a protest ballot proceeding, the new District shall replace the existing Natoma Station Landscape and Lighting District; and,

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom retained NBS as engineer of record for the purpose of assisting with the formation and annual levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 22605(d) of the Streets and Highways Code, the original Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District will be consolidated with the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2; and,

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 22611 of the Streets and Highways Code, all assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and installments of the original Natoma Station Landscaping and Lighting District shall be transferred to, and assumed by, the Natoma Station Maintenanc e Assessment District No. 2025-2 for the continued maintenance and servicing of the improvements.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom as follows:

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11548

1. Intention: The City Council hereby declares its intention to order the formation of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2, pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments to pay for the costs of services and improvements described in Section 6 of this Resolution.

2. Preliminary Engineer’s Report: A Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the formation of the District has been made and filed with the City Clerk. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Preliminary Engineer’s Report and deems it sufficient. The City Council hereby approves the Preliminary Engineer’s Report.

3. Calling a special ballot proceeding: Pursuant to California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID, (hereafter referred to as the “Proposition 218”), an assessment ballot proceeding is hereby called on behalf of the District on the proposition of levying the assessments and the assessment ran ge formula to allow for reasonable inflationary increases within the District.

4. The assessment ballot proceeding for the District on the proposition of authorizing the assessments and the assessment range formula to allow for reasonable inflationary increases, pursuant to Section 4, Sub- Section 4 (c and d) of Proposition 218 consists of a ballot and mailed notice, distributed to the property owners of record within the District as of the County’s last equalized roll. Each property owner’s vote is weighted by the amount of their proposed assessment and may return the ballot by mail or i n person to the City Clerk not later than the conclusion of the Public Hearing on April 28, 2026. At the Public Hearing, pursuant to Section 4, Sub- Section 4 (e) of Proposition 218 the agency shall tabulate the ballots to determine if a majority protest exists. The ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the af fected property. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the Public Hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessments exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessments.

5. District Boundaries: The boundary of the District is generally described as follows: within the City of Folsom, bound by Folsom Boulevard to the west from Blue Ravine Road to the El Dorado Freeway to the south, connecting to Iron Point Road, and west of Prairie City Road, described in more detail in the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2.

6. Description of Improvements: A detailed description of the improvements can be found in the Preliminary Engineer’s Report. Generally, the improvements within the District may include, but are not limited to:

(1) the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street trees and other landscaping throughout the boundary of the District, including but not limited to groundcover, turf, trees, weed, and pest management; shrubs, planters, street medians in the public right of way as well as open space, trails and green belt areas dispersed throughout the District; and may also include sidewalk and hardscape improvements, entry monuments and associated

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11548

appurtenant facilities. Eligible District costs may include, but are not limited to, personnel, furnishing electrical energy, utilities such as water, refuse and gas, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services;

(2) the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street lighting, including theme light poles, ornamental lighting, and other appurtenant facilities in the public right -of-way areas throughout the boundary of the District. The improvements are generally descri bed as the maintenance, operation, and servicing of public street lighting facilities, including all works or improvements used or useful for the lighting of any public places, including ornamental standards, luminaires, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances;

(3) the maintenance, operation, and servicing of Public Art within the District. Costs include, but are not limited to, personnel, supplies, contracting services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory maintenance of these art pieces located at village entries and mini parks.

7. Proposed Assessment Amounts: For Fiscal Year 2026/27, the proposed assessments are outlined in the Preliminary Engineer’s Report, which details the annual assessments and formula.

8. Public Hearing(s): The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning the formation of the District and the initial levy of assessments, as well as its intention to conduct Public Hearings annually, post District formation, concerning the continuing levy of assessments for the District in accordance with the Act.

9. Notice: The City shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing to all property owners within the District by mail and cause the publication of this Resolution once in the local newspaper for two consecutive weeks not less than ten (10) days before the date of the Public Hearing, and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices. Property owners will be provided an assessment ballot to approve or protest the proposed assessment and the assessment range formula to allow for reasonable inflationary increases. Ballots must be received prior to the conclusion of the Public Hearing, at which they will be tabulated. At the Public Hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.

10. Notice of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council at 6:30 p.m. on April 28, 2026, or as soon thereafter as feasible at City Council Chambers, 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630.

11. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of such hearing as provided by law.

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11548

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2026, by the following roll -call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

____________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Attachment 2

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

nbsgov.com

Preliminary Formation and Annual Engineer’s Report For:

Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment
District No 2025-2

Fiscal Year 2026/27

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 District History ........................................................................................................ 1

1.2 Legislative Context .................................................................................................. 1

2. Improvements .................................................................................................................. 3

2.1 Landscaping and Park Maintenance ....................................................................... 3

2.2 Street Lighting ......................................................................................................... 5

2.3 Public Art ................................................................................................................ 6

3. Special Benefits ................................................................................................................ 7

3.1 Improved Aesthetics and Livability ......................................................................... 7

3.2 Improved Safety and Accessibility .......................................................................... 8

4. Separation and Quantification of General Benefits ........................................................... 9

4.1 General Benefit Analysis ......................................................................................... 9

5. Special Benefit Distribution ............................................................................................ 14

5.1 Parcel Characteristics ............................................................................................ 14

5.2 Land Use Classifications ........................................................................................ 14

5.3 Trip Factor ............................................................................................................. 16

5.4 Total Benefit Points............................................................................................... 16

6. Budget ............................................................................................................................ 17

6.1 Maximum Amount to be Assessed ....................................................................... 17

6.2 FY 2026/27 Maximum Assessment Rate ............................................................... 18

6.3 Annual Maximum Assessment Rate Inflation ....................................................... 18

6.4 Future Changes to Parcel Characteristics .............................................................. 19

6.5 Data for Annual Assessment Calculations ............................................................. 19

6.6 Appeals ................................................................................................................. 19

6.7 Method of Collection ............................................................................................ 20

7. Engineer’s Statement...................................................................................................... 21

8. Assessment Diagram ...................................................................................................... 22

9. Assessment Roll .............................................................................................................. 23

10. References ...................................................................................................................... 24

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

Table of Tables

TABLE 1. AVERAGE DAILY TRIP GENERATION WITHIN THE DISTRICT ............................................................... 10 TABLE 2. ROADWAY DESIGN CAPACITY THROUGH DISTRICT ........................................................................... 10 TABLE 3. ESTIMATED PASS THROUGH VEHICLE TRIPS ...................................................................................... 11 TABLE 4. ESTIMATED TRAVEL TIME THROUGH DISTRICT ................................................................................. 11 TABLE 5.TOTAL PASS-THROUGH TIME ............................................................................................................. 11 TABLE 6. TOTAL PASS-THROUGH PERCENTAGE ............................................................................................... 11 TABLE 7. ADJUSTED TOTAL PASS-THROUGH PERCENTAGE .............................................................................. 12 TABLE 8. OVERALL GENERAL BENEFIT .............................................................................................................. 13 TABLE 9. LAND USE BENEFIT POINTS ................................................................................................................ 15 TABLE 10. FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 ESTIMATED BUDGET .................................................................................... 17 TABLE 11. BREAKDOWN OF MAXIMUM TO BE ASSESSED................................................................................ 17

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 1

1. Introduction

1.1 District History
The property owners of Natoma Station in the City of Folsom (“City”) desire to fund the operation, enhanced service levels of maintenance and servicing of certain landscaping, street lighting, parks and public art as described in Section 2 of this Report through an annual assessment. The proposed assessment is subject to the substantive and procedural requirements described in Section 4, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Article XIII D”). The assessment is authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq.) (“the “Act”).

The Natoma Station area currently has an assessment district which was established in 1990 to provide a source of funding for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, parks, public art, and other improvements within the district. However, while costs have continued to increase and the district has continued to build out and add additional trees, landscaping and street lighting, there has not been an increase in the assessment rate as there is no inflator.

As the existing assessment district revenue does not provide sufficient funding for the services and improvements, the City proposes to form a new assessment district that is intended to fund ongoing annual maintenance, operation, and servicing of the landscaping, street lighting, public art, and other improvements; reserve funds for replacement and repair of the improvements; administrative expenses; and an allowance for an annual inflator so the assessment rate may be increased over time as costs increase, without conducting a new ballot proceeding. The proposed assessment district is the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2 (“District”). If approved, the District will replace the existing assessment district beginning in Fiscal Year 2026/27.

1.2 Legislative Context
In 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218, known as the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. Article XIII D established new substantive and procedural requirements on agencies for levying assessments, being levies on real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. “Special benefit” is defined in Article XIII D as “a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on a real property located in the district or to the public at large.”
Article XIII D imposes five basic substantive requirements on assessments:
(1) All parcels that will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed must be identified;
(2) The general benefits must be distinguished from the special benefits conferred on the parcels;
(3) The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel must be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property-related service being provided;

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 2
(4) The amount assessed to a parcel must not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel and must not include any costs attributable to the general benefit; and
(5) Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.

Article XIII D also imposes procedural requirements on assessments, which include preparing an engineer’s report, providing written notice of the proposed assessment and public hearing to property owners, holding a public hearing, and providing for a protest ballot proceeding.

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 3

2. Improvements
The assessments will fund the following maintenance, operation, and servicing activities related to the following improvements:
• Landscaping
• Street Lighting
• Park Maintenance
• Public Art
The maintenance, operation, and servicing activities listed above are collectively referred to as the “Improvements.” A general illustration of the location of the Improvements is shown below, and the Assessment Diagram can be found in Section 8.

For illustration purposes only, not an official map.

2.1 Landscaping and Park Maintenance
The Improvements include the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street trees and other landscaping throughout the boundary of the District including but not limited to: groundcover, turf, trees, weed and

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 4
pest management; shrubs, planters, street medians in the public right of way as well as open space, trails and green belt areas dispersed throughout the District; and may also include sidewalk and hardscape improvements, entry monuments and associated appurtenant facilities. Eligible District costs may include, but are not limited to personnel, furnishing electrical energy, utilities such as water, refuse and gas, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services.

The general location of the Improvements within the District is shown in the illustration above. The maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping generally includes the following:

1. 9.37 acres of streetscapes

2. 7 large entry monument signs

3. 10,200 linear feet of 6’ sound wall

4. 1,045 linear feet of iron fencing

5. 9.1 acres of open space

6. 2 mini parks

7. 2 community parks

8. 16 irrigation controllers

9. 37 backflows

10. 27 corner pillars (between fences)

11. Redwoods on Black Diamond Drive

12. Open space/basin maintenance

13. Overall maintenance of sidewalks (pressure washing, crack filling, etc.)

14. Tree maintenance

15. Painting, replacing park light poles

16. Replacing obsolete, inefficient, and aging infrastructure with new industry-standard equipment

17. Sufficient funding for current and future maintenance and replacement costs

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 5

2.2 Street Lighting
The Improvements include the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street lighting, including theme light poles, ornamental lighting and other appurtenant facilities in the public right of way areas throughout the boundary of the District. The Improvements are generally described as: maintenance, operation, and servicing of public street lighting facilities, including all works or improvements used or useful for the lighting of any public places, including ornamental standards, luminaires, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances. Maintenance, operation, and servicing includes, but is not limited to, personnel, furnishing utilities, electrical energy and timing/switching, lamp changing, emergency services, pole painting, fixture cleaning, glassware replacement, and rehabilitation, which includes modernization and replacement of systems; repairs including poles, conduit, wiring and fusing, and fixtures repair and replacement; contracting services and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. Currently, there are 296 total streetlights within the District.

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 6

2.3 Public Art
The Improvements include the maintenance of public art pieces found in the boundary of the District. The City has 28 public art pieces, 21 of which are located within the District. The District will fund costs in connection with the maintenance of the public art pieces including, but not limited to, personnel, supplies, contracting services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory maintenance of these art pieces located at village entries and mini parks.

02/10/2026 Item No.13.

City of Folsom Final Engineer’s Report – Natoma Station MAD No. 2025-2 Prepared by NBS – February 2026 7

3. Special Benefits
The Improvements will confer special benefits upon certain parcels within the proposed District based upon the parcel characteristics described in Section 5. This section provides a description of those special benefits.

Improvement Benefit(s)
Landscaping, Parks, Public Art, and
Street Lighting
Improved Aesthetics and Livability and Improved Safety
Improved Safety and Accessibility

3.1 Improved Aesthetics and Livability
The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the ongoing maintenance, operation, and servicing of the Improvements within the District. Specifically, landscaping, parks and public art are believed to create a more beautiful, aesthetically pleasing environment within a community, and they enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the area. A study by the University of Georgia found "People’s preferences for locating areas of social interactions in calming, beautiful, and nature-dominated areas revolve around the presence of community trees and forests" (Coder, 1996). The same study noted “Large old street trees were found to be the most important indicator of attractiveness in a community” (Coder).

Conversely, "appeal decreases when Improvements are not well maintained, unsafe, or destroyed by vandalism” (The Victoria Transportation Institute, 2011). Streetscapes and public art have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, and public art that is well maintained, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity, and attract residents and visitors to the community. Therefore, the landscaping and public art Improvements will confer aesthetic benefits to properties in close proximity.

Livability is a measurement of the factors that add up to a community’s quality of life, including but not limited to the built and natural environments, economic prosperity, social stability and equity, cultural, entertainment and recreation possibilities. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute explains that “Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community...” In addition, the presence of natural areas and green landscapes are positively related to neighborhood satisfaction (Kearney, 2006). The presence of street trees has been shown to encourage increased physical activity and increased social cohesion in the urban environment (VanDillen et al., 2011). Therefore, the street trees and other landscaping will confer livability benefits to property within the District.

Additionally, street lighting contributes to the aesthetic appeal of neighborhoods and supports local economies by making non-residential areas more inviting. In fact, the streetlights themselves can contribute to the overall aesthetic of an area. According to an American Gas Lamp Works article titled Replacing Street Lights for Brighter and Safer Communities, “Well-lit streets aren’t just a convenience – they’re essential for a thriving community. Streetlights create a welcoming ambiance that invites people to linger in public