Folsom City Council
May 26, 2026

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Attachment 2

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Attachment 2
Section / Title:

Section 4.07 (Boards and Commissions)
What Change is Recommended and Why:

1. Remove “All boards and commissions only shall be advisory to the Council” Removing this restrictive phrasing allows for greater flexibility in how commissions and committees operate. The change is not intended to diminish the Council's ultimate oversight; rather, it is designed to preserve and clarify the City Council’s authority to formally delegate specific responsibilities or decision-making powers to boards and commissions through an ordinance when deemed appropriate. This adjustment would ensure the Charter does not inadvertently block the Council from empowering commissions and committees to take direct action on specialized matters.

2. Add “committees” to boards and commissions.

Adding this reference clarifies that members of committees must be residents and registered voters of the City, as are Council Members and members of boards and commissions.

Committee Vote:

The Committee voted 7-0 in favor of recommendation 1. Recommendation 2 is proposed by staff to close a loophole in the existing Charter language. This recommendation was not identified by staff until preparation for the City Council meeting on 5/12/26.

Current Language:

4.07 Boards and Commissions:

The City Council may by ordinance create other Boards and Commissions and prescribe their powers and duties, determine the number and qualification of the members, their method of selection, term of office and removal, and fix their compensation, if any. All boards and commissions only shall be advisory to the Council. Each member of any Board or Commission shall be a resident and registered voter of the City.

Proposed Language:

4.07 Boards, Commissions, and Committees:

The City Council may by ordinance create other Boards, Commissions, and Committees and prescribe their powers and duties, determine the number and qualification of the members, their method of selection, term of office and removal, and fix their compensation, if any. Each member of any Board, Commission, or Committee shall be a resident and registered voter of the City.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Redline Showing Changes:

4.07 Boards , and Commissions , and Committees :

The City Council may by ordinance create other Boards , and Commissions , and Committees and prescribe their powers and duties, determine the number and qualification of the members, their method of selection, term of office and removal, and fix their compensation, if any. All boards and commissions only shall be advisory to the Council. Each member of any Board , or Commission , or Committee shall be a resident and registered voter of the City.

#####

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Attachment 3

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Attachment 3
Section / Title:

Folsom Municipal Code § 2.48.030 (Campaign Contribution Limitation) What Change is Recommended and Why:

Increase campaign contribution limits from $150 to a higher amount to be determined.

The Committee recommended that campaign contribution limits increase from $150 to $750 to balance the influence of political action committees and special interests on local elections.

The Council deliberated on May 12, 2026 and did not yet reach a consensus regarding a new campaign contribution limit to be submitted to the voters at the November 3, 2026 election.

Committee Vote:

The Committee voted 7-0 in favor of the recommendation of raising the campaign contribution limit to $750.

Current Language:

2.48.030 Campaign contribution limitation.

A. No person other than a candidate shall make, and no campaign treasurer shall solicit or accept, any contribution which will cause the total amount contributed by such person with respect to a single election in support or opposition to such candidate, including contributions to all committees supporting or opposing such candidate, to exceed $150.

B. Extension of credit for a period of more than 90 days is prohibited. Extension of credit for more than $1,000 is prohibited; provided, however, a candidate may personally borrow any amount and such funds shall be considered as a contribution by the candidate personally; provided, further, that such transaction is fully disclosed and documented in accordance with applicable law.

C. The terms of this section are applicable to any contributions made to a candidate or committee hereunder, whether used by such candidate or committee to finance a current campaign, to pay deficits incurred in a prior campaign, or otherwise.

D. If any person is found guilty of violating the terms of this section, the amount of funds received constituting such violation shall be paid by the candidate or committee treasurer who received such funds to the city finance director for deposit in the general fund of the city.

E. As used in this section, “extension of credit” means any loan, gift, forbearance or forgiveness of debt without adequate compensation.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Proposed Language:

2.48.030 Campaign contribution limitation.

A. No person other than a candidate shall make, and no campaign treasurer shall solicit or accept, any contribution which will cause the total amount contributed by such person with respect to a single election in support or opposition to such candidate, including contributions to all committees supporting or opposing such candidate, to exceed $_____.

B. Extension of credit for a period of more than 90 days is prohibited. Extension of credit for more than $1,000 is prohibited; provided, however, a candidate may personally borrow any amount and such funds shall be considered as a contribution by the candidate personally; provided, further, that such transaction is fully disclosed and documented in accordance with applicable law.

C. The terms of this section are applicable to any contributions made to a candidate or committee hereunder, whether used by such candidate or committee to finance a current campaign, to pay deficits incurred in a prior campaign, or otherwise.

D. If any person is found guilty of violating the terms of this section, the amount of funds received constituting such violation shall be paid by the candidate or committee treasurer who received such funds to the city finance director for deposit in the general fund of the city.

E. As used in this section, “extension of credit” means any loan, gift, forbearance or forgiveness of debt without adequate compensation.

Redline Showing Changes:

2.48.030 Campaign contribution limitation.

A. No person other than a candidate shall make, and no campaign treasurer shall solicit or accept, any contribution which will cause the total amount contributed by such person with respect to a single election in support or opposition to such candidate, including contributions to all committees supporting or opposing such candidate, to exceed $150 $_____ .

B. Extension of credit for a period of more than 90 days is prohibited. Extension of credit for more than $1,000 is prohibited; provided, however, a candidate may personally borrow any amount and such funds shall be considered as a contribution by the candidate personally; provided, further, that such transaction is fully disclosed and documented in accordance with applicable law.

C. The terms of this section are applicable to any contributions made to a candidate or committee hereunder, whether used by such candidate or committee to finance a current campaign, to pay deficits incurred in a prior campaign, or otherwise.

D. If any person is found guilty of violating the terms of this section, the amount of funds received constituting such violation shall be paid by the candidate or committee treasurer who received such funds to the city finance director for deposit in the general fund of the city.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

E. As used in this section, “extension of credit” means any loan, gift, forbearance or forgiveness of debt without adequate compensation.

#####

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

06/09/2026 Item No.15.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

5/26/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11620 – A Resolution Approving the Master Development Plan for Jackrabbit Hill Park

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 11620 – A Resolution Approving the Master Development Plan for Jackrabbit Hill Park.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Jackrabbit Hill Park, formerly known as Neighborhood Park #1 (NP1), is in the Folsom Plan Area (FPA), south of Highway 50 at the intersection of Empire Ranch Road and Mangini Parkway. It is located adjacent to a future elementary school site. Jackrabbit Hill Park will be the second park designed and built in the FPA. The Parks and Recreation M aster Plan – 2015 Update (PRMP) proposed the following programmed elements for the 10.75-acre site.

• Soccer Field (lighted)
• Youth Baseball Field (lighted)
• Children’s Playground
• Basketball Court (lighted)
• Group Picnic Area
• Restroom Building
• Parking Lot

As stated in the PRMP, these programmed elements and facilities are opportunities and suggestions for future parks and not intended to be absolute directives. The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) also allows for changes to the original programmed facilities to accommodate changes in the City's needs. Part of the planning process for parks includes an assessment of historical, current, and future trends, as well as an evaluation of past field use throughout the City. Trends in the recreation industry as a whole are also considered. Staff research and analysis, combined with input received during the community engagement process, and available funding contribute to the determination of the facilities to be provided in each park.

06/09/2026 Item No.16.
2 At the October 28, 2025, City Council meeting, a design contract was approved with Wilson Design Studio (WDS) for the park planning services of Jackrabbit Hill Park. The planning process includes an updated Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Cost Estimate, community outreach, master development plan, preparation of construction documents and specifications, and construction administration assistance.

Staff are in the process of establishing Park Development Design Principles to ensure that each park is programmed, planned, and designed to best serve the recreational needs of Folsom residents. The Park Development Design Principles (“Principles”) aim to ensure t hat each park type meets the needs of residents within its service area while ensuring that the overall park and recreation system is properly balanced with the right amount of active and passive amenities to serve the entire Folsom demographic. The design principles were presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission in January and also reviewed during the community outreach meeting.

Jackrabbit Hill Park is a neighborhood park, serving a ½ mile radius with an anticipated length of visitor stay between one and two hours. According to the Principles, the amenities typically included in a neighborhood park are:

o Playground with separate areas for 2-5 and 5-12 age groups with swings and shade elements
o Picnic area with shade shelter
o Site furnishings, including a drinking fountain and benches o Loop trails
o No more than two types of sports courts
o Non-programmable natural turf fields and
o Garden areas
o Design may need to provide support amenities such as parking, restrooms, and lighting, depending on the final amenities provided

POLICY / RULE
The development of the recreation facilities is identified in the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan – 2015 Update, which is a companion document to the Parks and Recreation Element of the City’s General Plan. The project -specific Jackrabbit Hill Park Master Development Plan requires approval by the City Council in order to be in compliance with the adopted Folsom 2035 General Plan, including Goal PR 1.1, which states, “Develop and maintain quality parks that support the diverse needs of the community.” And Goal PR 3.1, which states “Encourage community members and organizations to participate in the planning, development, and maintenance of the recreation facilities and programs.”

ANALYSIS
Staff hosted the first community workshop for Jackrabbit Hill Park at Alder Creek Elementary School on January 26, 2026. The workshop included an informational presentation from Park Planning staff about the park project background, neighborhood park amenities, and the park site's existing conditions. After the presentation, there was an interactive design charrette activity for attendees to participate in. During the charrette, the community members developed five concept

06/09/2026 Item No.16.
3 plans for the park and presented the concepts to one another and to staff. Approximately 45 community members attended the first community workshop.

Following the first workshop, additional feedback was collected from the community through an online survey, which was open from January 26 to February 1, 2026, and received 171 responses.

The survey was utilized to gather input from the broader community within the park service radius.

The survey contained questions about the community’s preferred park amenities.

In collaboration with WDS, staff prepared two draft master development plans, which were presented to the community at a second community workshop held at Alder Creek Elementary School on February 23, 2026. Approximately 20 community members attended the s econd community workshop. Both draft master development plans incorporated the amenities identified at the first community workshop and prioritized in the online survey. The main differences between the two draft Master Development Plans, referred to as Op tion 1 and Option 2, relate to the orientation and placement of park amenities on the site, as well as the amenities’ proximity to one another. Key differences between the two options include:

Option 1
• Included a passive reflection/wellness space with a view overlook. • The playgrounds, group picnic pavilion, and community plaza were closer to the restroom and parking lot.

Option 2
• The basketball and pickleball courts were closer to the restroom and parking lot. • The playgrounds, group picnic pavilion, and community plaza were closer to the view overlook.

Following the second community workshop, public online voting was open from February 23 to March 1, 2026, to allow the community to vote on their preferred draft master development plan option and provide feedback to the City. There were 108 responses to the online voting survey, and the results were:

Option 1 – 74 votes (69%)
Option 2 – 31 votes (29%)
Unsure – 3 votes (2%)

The top-voted plan, Option 1, was further refined to create the proposed Master Development Plan (See Attachment 2). This plan includes the following amenities:

• Parking lot off of Rock Springs Ranch Drive (+/- 78 parking stalls) • Restroom (double all-gender with drinking fountain)
• Drinking fountains
• Basketball court
• Four pickleball courts
• Flexible multi-use lawn with multipurpose rectangular field (soccer, lacrosse, etc.) • Playground for 2–5-year-olds, with shade

06/09/2026 Item No.16.
4 • Playground for 5–12-year-olds, with shade
• Three outdoor fitness stations
• Shaded group picnic pavilion
• Community plaza with shade trees, picnic tables, and a raised platform • Passive seating area with views
• Accessible pathway connection to the future school site • Nature area with a walking path
• Walking loop path

Staff met with the Planning and Development Subcommittee of the Parks & Recreation Commission on April 17, 2026, to review development of the park master plan design. During this meeting, the Subcommittee reviewed a summary of community engagement and the draft master plan design. The Subcommittee supported the Master Development Plan.

On May 5, 2026, the Parks & Recreation Commission unanimously approved a recommendation to forward the Master Development Plan to the City Council for approval.

Theming will play an integral part in the design of Jackrabbit Hill Park. Design themes help shape the park’s overall character, identity, and style, influencing elements such as play areas, site furnishings, buildings, structures, paving, and planting. The j ackrabbit hill theme may be interpreted through animal -shaped play equipment, animal habitat -inspired park landforms and features, and regional native planting. The Parks & Recreation Commission strongly supports incorporating the jackrabbit hill theme into the park design.

Funding for the design and engineering of Jackrabbit Hill Park was approved in the budget for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget in the amount of $706,614. Funding was provided from the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Capital Fund (Fund 472). Funding for the construction phase will be considered during the Fiscal Year 2026-27 CIP budget. The preliminary construction cost is estimated at $7.1M, and the total project budget is $8.7M. As the design and engineering progress, modificat ions may need to be made to the Master Development Plan to ensure that the project remains within the current estimated budget.

Below is a summary of the current estimated project costs:

Estimated Budget:

Item Cost
Park Construction $7,100,000
(includes 10% construction contingency)

Estimated Soft Costs $900,000
(Design & Engineering, Permits, Admin Costs)

Project Contingency $700,000
Total $8,700,000

FINANCIAL IMPACT

06/09/2026 Item No.16.
5 There is no direct financial impact in approving the Master Development Plan for Jackrabbitt Hill Park (Project PK2601).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Jackrabbit Hill Park was included in the FPA Environmental Impact Report in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11620 – A Resolution Approving the Master Development Plan for Jackrabbit Hill Park

2. Jackrabbit Hill Park – Master Development Plan

Submitted,

Kelly Gonzalez,
Parks & Recreation Department Director

06/09/2026 Item No.16.

Attachment 1

06/09/2026 Item No.16.

Resolution No. 11620

RESOLUTION NO. 11620

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR

JACKRABBIT HILL PARK

WHEREAS, the Jackrabbit Hill Park project (the “Project”) is identified in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as a future neighborhood park; and

WHEREAS, the City conducted community outreach, including public workshops and surveys, to develop a preferred Master Development Plan; and

WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report for the Folsom Plan Area, inclusive of the Project, has been prepared to fulfill the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and

WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Master Development Plan and unanimously recommended City Council approval on May 5, 2026; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom approves the Jackrabbit Hill Park Master Development Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26
th day of May, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

06/09/2026 Item No.16.

Attachment 2

06/09/2026 Item No.16.

06/09/2026 Item No.16.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

06/09/2026 Item No.16.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

5/26/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11629 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc. for the Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment in the Amount of $335,000 from the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the New Corporation Yard Project and Appropriation of Funds

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11629 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc. for the Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment in the Amount of $335,000 from the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the New Corporation Yard Project and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The City of Folsom is undertaking a major effort to relocate and modernize its existing Corporation Yard, currently located at 1300 Leidesdorff Street, a 14 -acre site that houses the City’s maintenance and operations divisions, including solid waste, fleet services, and portions of utilities. The Corporation Yard also serves as the primary location for equipment and operations during emergency response. The existing yard, built in the 1960’s , contains several temporary , outdated, and undersized structures and no longer meets operational or spatial needs for the City as it has grown over the past 60 years.

In 2013, the City annexed approximately 3,500 acres of unincorporated Sacramento County land south of U.S. Highway 50, known as the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP). As part of that annexation, the City committed to developing a new 36-acre Corporation Yard south of Highway 50 to serve the growing community and future City operations.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.
2 The proposed new Corporation Yard site is located just south of the Capital Southeast Connector and bordered to the south and west by the newly aligned Scott Road. The project is a strategic investment rather than a simple relocation, and efforts will include evaluation of alternatives for a modern, energy -efficient, resilient, inclusive, and safety -compliant facility to accommodate approximately 275 staff members (maintenance, operations, and administrative). The updated planning effort will also validate prior staffing assumptions, evaluate modern operational practices, and incorporate long-term considerations such as fleet electrification, digital storage, hybrid work environments, and future operational resiliency.

POLICY / RULE

Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code requires City Council approval for contracts with an estimated value of $77,426 or more.

ANALYSIS

The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on August 4, 2025, seeking qualified firms to provide consulting services for site planning and environmental assessment. Proposals were due on September 5, 2025. Although numerous consulting firms accessed the RFP and proactive engagement occurred during the proposal process , only one proposal was received , likely due to the specific nature of the project and industry workload . With the receipt of one proposal, staff conducted a team meeting with Griffin and performed a thorough reference check to evaluate the proposer’s qualifications and performance history. The firm, Griffin Structures , Inc. , received highly favorable references from other municipalities that have contracted with the firm for similar types of work. The proposal submitted by Griffin Structures , Inc. was responsive to all requirements outlined in the RFP and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of municipal facilities, the project scope and deliverables.

Griffin Structures, Inc.’s proposal outlines a detailed scope of work that includes:
• Validation and analysis of the 2008 Corporation Yard Needs Assessment Study, including recalibration of staffing and service assumptions based on current needs and anticipated operation changes to address components such as advanced clean fleet. • Preparation of staff and space projections validation & alignment (2050 buildout scenario)
• Utility identification and coordination
• Site survey
• Development and evaluation of conceptual alternatives with comparative costing and operational analysis
• Development of a preliminary site plan incorporating sustainability, EV infrastructure, resiliency, and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles • Environmental documentation
• Strategic grant funding support aligned with clean energy, resiliency, and fleet electrification initiatives
• Preparation of a final report and presentation for City Council consideration

06/09/2026 Item No.17.
3 The proposed scope of work and associated fee for these services are provided as attachments to this staff report. The scope outlines the specific tasks and deliverables for completion, while the fee proposal details the corresponding costs for each task. These documents have been reviewed by City staff and are consistent with the anticipated level of effort required to complete the project.

Due to the historic knowledge of this project through various planning documents and to allow this initial effort to commence timely, this item is being brought to City Council in advance of the FY 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program budget adoption which is anticipated at the end of June.

Griffin Structures, Inc. has provided an anticipated schedule of approximately seven months to complete the scope of services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

If approved, the agreement with Griffin Structures Inc. would be authorized for $335,000. Staff is requesting an appropriation in the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) in the amount of $335,000 to the New Corporation Yard Project for the agreement. Sufficient funds are available in the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the appropriation. Future phases, including environmental, design, and construction will be brought back to City Council during future budget discussions for capital improvement planning.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The award of this Consultant and Professional Services agreement is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Any future construction or implementation project resulting from this contract will be subject to separate environmental review under CEQA prior to approval.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11629 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc. for the Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment in the Amount of $335,000 from the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the New Corporation Yard Project and Appropriation of Funds

2. Existing Corporation Yard Location Map

3. New Corporation Yard Location Map

4. Griffin Structures, Inc. – Scope of Work

5. Griffin Structures, Inc. – Fee Proposal

06/09/2026 Item No.17.
4 Respectfully Submitted,

Rebecca Neves, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 11629 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc. for the Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment in the Amount of $335,000 from the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fun d 459) for the New Corporation Yard Project and Appropriation of Funds

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

Resolution No. 11629

RESOLUTION NO. 11629

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. FOR THE CORPORATION YARD SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $335,000 FROM THE CORPORATION YARD CAPITAL FUND (FUND 459) FOR THE NEW

CORPORATION YARD PROJECT AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom is undertaking efforts to relocate and modernize its existing Corporation Yard to better accommodate operational and spatial needs for City maintenance, operations, and utility divisions; and

WHEREAS, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was advertised on August 4, 2025, seeking qualified firms to provide consulting services for corporation yard planning, operational needs validation, conceptual site planning, utility coordination, environmental assessment, and long - range facility planning related to the proposed new Corporation Yard south of U.S. Highway 50; and

WHEREAS, Griffin Structures, Inc. submitted a responsive proposal that demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the City’s project requirements and was determined by staff to be qualified based on reference checks and proposal evaluation; and

WHEREAS, the consulting services will include validation and refinement of the City’s 2008 Corporation Yard Needs Assessment to support long-term operational planning through the 2050 planning horizon; and

WHEREAS, the proposed planning effort includes evaluation of sustainability, resiliency, fleet electrification, and future operational infrastructure needs associated with development of a modern Corporation Yard facility; and

WHEREAS, an appropriation in the amount of $335,000 in the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) to the New Corporation Yard Project will require ; and

WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the appropriation; and

WHEREAS, the contract will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc. for the Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment in the amount of $335,000 from the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the New Corporation Yard Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

Resolution No. 11629

authorized to appropriate $335,000 in the Corporation Yard Capital Fund (Fund 459) for the New Corporation Yard Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 26th day of May 2026, by the following roll -call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Corporation Yard Location Map

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 2

EXISTING CORPORATION YARD LOCATION MAP

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 3
New Corporation Yard Location Map

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 3

NEW CORPORATION YARD LOCATION MAP

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 4
Griffin Structures, Inc. – Scope of Work

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

CITY OF FOLSOM
Consulting Services for the City of Folsom Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment Revised Proposal
MAY 4, 2026

WALNUT CREEK CORPORATE YARD

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

MORGAN HILL CORPORATE YARD

SAN MATEO JOINT

USE CORPORATE YARD

TUSTIN CORPORATE YARD, WATER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
& EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER

HAYWARD CORPORATE
YARD

TIBURON CORPORATE YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

Why Our Team?
Significant
experience with:

Public Works &
Corporate Yards
Maintenance
Services Facilities
LEED Silver, Gold,
Platinum & Net Zero
Energy Facilities
Northern California
Experience with
Projects of Similar Size,
Scale, & Needs
Unparalleled corporate yard
portfolio and experience and
project delivery from Concept to
Keys.

Local experience with Public
Sector Corporate Yards.

Highlighted
Projects:

San Mateo Joint Use
Corporate Yard
Santa Cruz County
Sanitation District
Tustin Corporate Yard,
Water Administration
Building & EOC
Walnut Creek Corporate
Yard
Hayward Corporate Yard
Morgan Hill Maintenance
& Operations Yard
Tiburon Corporate Yard
Demonstrated development
experience managing projects
from assessment through
implementation.

CONFIDENTIAL
California Civil Code § 3426.1 (d); California Evidence Code section 1040 and 1060; California Government Code section 6254(k); Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) DO NOT RELEASE WITHOUT GRIFFIN STRUCTURES’ CONSENT & REDACTIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Transmittal Letter 1
B. Introduction 2
C. Scope of Work 4
D. Consultant and Subconsultant Staff 1 7
E. Consultant Qualifications and References 2 0
F. Team Resumes 2 5
G. Consultant Rate Schedule 4 1
H. Appendix 4 2

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

TUSTIN WATER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,

CORPORATE YARD & EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
A. TRANSMITTAL LETTER

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
A. T R A n SMITTAL L E TTER 1
GRIFFI n STRUCTURESA. T R A n SMITTAL L E TTER 1
T R A n S M I T T A L
Consulting Services for the City of Folsom Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment
MAY 4, 2026
Ryan Chance, Engineering Manager
City of Folsom - Public Works
50 na toma Street
Folsom, California 95630
Dear City Evaluation Team,
We thank you for the opportunity to propose and look forward to speaking with you. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions.

Respectfully,
Dustin Alamo, CCM, LEED AP, DRE Broker #01930629
Vice President & Predevelopment Manager, Project Manager P: (408) 955-0431 | E: [email protected] » With exception to the comments contained within our appendix, we have read, understood, and agreed to all statements in the request for proposal and acknowledge receipt of all addenda and amendments as well as to the terms, conditions, and attachments referenced.

SEnT FROM GRIFFIn STRUCTURES LOCATED AT 1850 WARBURTOn AVEnUE, SUITE 120 SA nTA CLARA, CA 95050

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

POMONA WATER RESOURCES HEADQUARTERS & YARD
B. INTRODUCTION

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESB. In T RODUCTIO n 2
1850 WARBURTO n AVE, SUITE 120 | SA n TA CLARA, CA | 408.955.0431 May 4, 2026
Ryan Chance, Engineering Manager
City of Folsom
50 nat oma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
RE: Consulting Services for the City of Folsom Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment Dear Mr. Chance & Evaluation Team,
Griffin Structures is pleased to submit our proposal to the City of Folsom for the Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment Project. This represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to replace an outdated facility with a modern, efficient, and sustainable operations hub that will support the City’s services and growth through 2050 and beyond.

As a leader in program and construction management, Griffin has delivered more than 300 municipal facility planning efforts, including over 50 corporation yards and operations centers across California, many of which we have guided through implementation. We understand that success is not defined by planning alone, but by delivering solutions that are practical, cost-aligned, and executable, with clear phasing strategies and defensible CEQA pathways that maintain uninterrupted City operations.

A key strength we bring to Folsom is our ability to build upon prior planning efforts and translate them into actionable outcomes. We will leverage the City’s 2008 Corporation Yard ne eds Assessment as a baseline, validate and recalibrate its assumptions with current operational input, and advance a forward-looking, implementable plan that reflects today’s service delivery models, emerging technologies, and long-term growth.

To deliver on this approach, we have assembled a highly integrated team of trusted partners with deep experience across every element of the RFP scope:
• LPA Design Studios – Project Architect and nationally recognized design, firm with whom we’ve partnered for over 25 years on more than $5 billion in public-sector projects.
• BKF Engineers & MNS Engineers – Civil engineering and surveying, providing accurate site data and early utility coordination.
• Twining, Inc. – Geotechnical engineering, delivering practical recommendations for grading, pavement, and foundations. • Dudek – Environmental consulting and CEQA compliance, with extensive experience preparing defensible addenda and technical studies.
• Townsend Public Affairs (TPA) – Grant strategy and funding support aligned with clean energy, fleet electrification, and resiliency initiatives.

This team has collaborated on numerous complex municipal projects, including consolidated corporation yards and multi- agency operations centers similar in scale and complexity to Folsom’s effort. Together, we will validate and update the City’s needs assessment, coordinate utilities for the 36-acre site, ground planning decisions in survey and geotechnical data, evaluate multiple site concepts with cost comparisons, and advance a Council-ready plan that is efficient, resilient, and financially grounded.

I will personally serve as Project Manager, bringing direct experience delivering corporation yard and utility facility projects throughout California. Griffin Structures has served as a trusted advisor to public agencies for more than four decades, and we are ready to bring that expertise to Folsom immediately.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to the opportunity to partner with the City on this important effort.

Dustin Alamo, CCM, DBIA, LEED AP, DRE Broker 0193029
Vice President, Project Manager
P: 408.955.0431 | E: [email protected]

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
B. In T RODUCTIO n 3
Introduction

ABOUT US
Founded in 1981, Griffin Structures is a diversified Owner's Representative / Program, Project and Construction Management firm serving public, private, non-profit, and institutional sectors. A unique aspect of our firm rests not only in our unparalleled administration and corporation / maintenance yard portfolio, but also in our ability to strategically manage assessments thru project implementation.. We hereby confirm we are ready to provide all applicable services as outlined within the RFP.

CONCEPT TO KEYSCONCEPT TO KEYS
Unlike our competitors, Griffin Structures possesses the experience and capacity to manage projects from Concept to Keys. By researching and evaluating current and future needs and engaging users before facility planning begins, Griffin Structures can assist clients in creating a framework for solid, information-based decision-making, providing clear options and tradeoffs for initial capital outlay, facility delivery methods, and the budgetary considerations of future costs and considerations.

CORPORATE YARD EXPERIENCECORPORATE YARD EXPERIENCE
Griffin Structures brings extensive experience in the planning, design, and delivery of municipal facilities, including corporate yard projects. Our expertise encompasses the development of efficient, functional spaces that align with operational needs and long-term community goals. Additionally, our strong presence in nort hern California positions us as a trusted partner for projects requiring a deep understanding of local needs and regional dynamics.

REGIONAL EXPERIENCEREGIONAL EXPERIENCE
The corporation / maintenance yard portfolio of Griffin Structures is extensive, including projects for the Cities of Tiburon, Walnut Creek, Hayward, and San Mateo County as well as a number of similar facilities across the state. Similar to your project, these corporate yards have included fleet / maintenance docks, vehicle & equipment storage, sustainability considerations, and more. Additionally, the yards we have programmed and delivered have included environmental services, water districts, sanitation systems, fleet services, parks and building infrastructure, and other key components. We are incredibly familiar with green design given our experience on a series of LEED Silver, Gold, Platinum, and net Zero Energy projects.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

WESTMINSTER CORPORATE YARD
C. SCOPE OF WORK

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESC. S C OPE O F W ORK 4
The City of Folsom is advancing the
development of a new, modern Corporation
Yard to replace its outdated 14-acre facility
on Leidesdorff Street. The existing yard,
comprised largely of temporary and aging
structures, no longer meets the City’s
operational, spatial, or infrastructure needs
and is not positioned to support long-term
growth, sustainability goals, or evolving service
delivery demands.

Following the 2013 annexation of the Folsom
Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) south of
Highway 50, the City acquired a 36-acre site
in 2018 at the southeast corner of Prairie
City Road, White Rock Road, and Scott Road.

This site presents a unique opportunity to
develop a consolidated, state-of-the-art
Corporation Yard that can efficiently support
approximately 275 maintenance, operations,
and administrative staff while improving
service delivery across the City.

A critical component of this effort is building
upon the City’s 2008 Corporation Yard ne eds
Assessment as a foundational baseline for
population and staffing projections. While
this prior work provides a valuable starting
point, it requires thoughtful validation and
refinement in collaboration with City staff
to reflect current operations, service delivery
models, and organizational changes, including
the removal of Transit services from the City’s
portfolio.

This updated analysis will recalibrate
population growth assumptions, staffing
projections, and service demands to align
with current conditions and future planning
horizons, ultimately informing a realistic and
defensible 2050 buildout scenario.

Project Overview and
Understanding of Project Challenges

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 5
Based on these validated projections, the project
will advance a comprehensive reassessment
of facility and site requirements using current
industry standards and forward-looking planning
considerations. This includes evaluating modern
space standards, evolving workstation strategies,
increased reliance on electronic records and
reduced physical storage, gender-neutral and
inclusive facility design, and operational shifts
such as fleet electrification and associated
infrastructure needs.

In parallel, the project will address the
complexities of developing an undeveloped site,
including identification and coordination of all
required utility infrastructure, preparation of a
detailed topographic and boundary survey, and
evaluation of site constraints and opportunities.

Multiple conceptual site alternatives will be
developed and tested, each supported by order-
of-magnitude cost estimates to enable informed
decision-making and alignment with City
priorities.

The City envisions a high-performing facility
centered on operational efficiency, safety,
and sustainability. Key programmatic and
infrastructure considerations include:
• Electric vehicle charging infrastructure for fleet
and staff vehicles
• Opportunities for on-site renewable energy
generation, including solar
• An OSHA-compliant fleet maintenance facility
designed to support both conventional and
electric vehicles
• A dedicated battery quarantine area for damaged
EV batteries
• A Household Hazardous Waste facility with public
receiving and reuse components
• Adequate fueling and wash facilities for light-
and heavy-duty vehicles
• Long-term planning for a potential future solid
waste transfer station
Additionally, the project includes preparation
of updated environmental documentation to
support CEQA compliance, along with strategic
grant support to position the City for funding
opportunities related to emissions reduction,
clean energy, and sustainable infrastructure.

Key objectives of this project are to:
• Validate and update population, staffing,
and service assumptions based on the 2008
study and current City operations.
• Reassess facility and site needs for a 2050
buildout scenario using modern planning
standards.
• Identify and coordinate all required utility
infrastructure to serve the undeveloped site.
• Prepare a detailed site survey to inform
planning and design decisions.
• Develop and evaluate multiple conceptual
site alternatives with associated cost
estimates.
• Advance a preferred site plan for stakeholder
alignment and environmental clearance.
• Document environmental requirements and
support CEQA compliance.
• Provide grant strategy and funding support
aligned with sustainability and infrastructure
goals.

WESTMINSTER CORPORATE YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 6
Project Approach
The City of Folsom has embarked on a critical
effort to plan and design a new Corporation
Yard to replace its undersized and outdated
facility at Leidesdorff Street. The new 36-acre
site, acquired in 2018 as part of the Folsom
Plan Area Specific Plan annexation, represents
an opportunity to create a modern, efficient,
and sustainable operations hub that can
accommodate approximately 275 employees
and the City’s growing service needs through
2050 and beyond.

Our team recognizes that this project is more
than a facility replacement; it is a strategic
reset of how the City plans, delivers, and
supports municipal services. Our approach
builds upon the City’s 2008 Corporation
Yard ne eds Assessment as a foundational
baseline, validates and re calibrates those
assumptions with current operational realities,
and advances a forward-looking planning
framework that reflects modern service
delivery, emerging technologies, and long-term
growth through 2050 and beyond
TASK 1: BACKGROUND

INVESTIGATION
We will begin by assembling and analyzing
all relevant background documentation, with
a focused evaluation of the 2008 Corporation
Yard ne eds Assessment to understand its
underlying assumptions related to population
growth, staffing projections, service delivery
models, and facility requirements.

Rather than treating the 2008 study as
outdated, we will use it as a structured
baseline and work with City staff to validate,
adjust, or replace key assumptions based on
current conditions. This includes confirming
organizational structure changes (such as the
removal of Transit services), evaluating how
service delivery has evolved, and identifying
where prior projections remain valid or require
recalibration. This approach ensures continuity
with prior planning efforts while grounding the
project in present-day realities.

TASK 2 - STAFF AND SPACE

PROJECTIONS VALIDATION &

ALIGNMENT
Building on Task 1, we will develop a validated
and forward-looking staffing and facility needs
assessment for the 2050 buildout horizon. This
effort will not start from scratch, but instead
will recalibrate the City’s prior projections
using the 2008 study as a benchmark, updated
through direct engagement with staff, current
operational data, and future service planning
assumptions.

This includes:
• Division-Level Workshops – We will engage
each division slated to occupy the new
Corporation Yard through focused workshops
designed to capture operational realities and
explore future efficiencies. Each session will:

POMONA WATER RESOURCES

HEADQUARTERS AND YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 7
» Map Operational Workflows - Document
how each division currently operates,
including daily routines, inter-department
coordination, and areas of operational
friction.
» Assess Staffing Levels - Review current
headcounts, supervisory structures, and
projected growth scenarios to ensure the
facility program accommodates both near-
term and 2050 buildout needs.
» Evaluate Equipment Requirements -
Inventory vehicle fleets, specialized tools,
and maintenance equipment, identifying
storage, circulation, and access needs for
each function.
» Define Space Needs - Translate operational
activities into space allocations,
adjacencies, and flexibility requirements,
ensuring each division’s functional needs are
captured.

In addition to capturing input, we will bring
best practices in municipal operations to help
each division think beyond current limitations,
including:
» Workplace Evolution - Right-sizing
administrative areas based on hybrid
work, flexible workstations, and shared
environments.
» Digital Transformation - Reduced reliance
on physical storage and increased
accommodation for electronic records and
data infrastructure.
» Inclusive Design - Integration of gender-
neutral and inclusive facilities aligned with
current standards and expectations.
» Fleet Electrification - Planning for EV fleet
transition, including charging infrastructure,
maintenance impacts, and battery
management.
» Operational Resiliency - Designing for
redundancy, emergency response, and
continuity of operations.
» Advanced Storage Systems - Applying
modern vertical and modular storage
technologies to maximize usable space and
minimize footprint.
» Just in Time Material Delivery - Exploring
procurement and inventory strategies
that reduce the need for excessive on-site
storage while maintaining reliability of
service delivery.
» Centralized Warehousing Concepts -
Identifying opportunities for shared storage,
cross-division inventory control, and
consolidated logistics to improve efficiency
and reduce redundancy.
» Operational Benchmarking - Sharing
lessons learned from comparable municipal
corporation yards to highlight innovative
approaches that can be adapted to Folsom’s
context.

Outcome: By combining direct staff input with
proven best practices, the needs assessment
will not only reflect “what is” but will also
identify opportunities for “what could be,”
helping the City achieve operational efficiency,
sustainability, and long-term adaptability.

Scenario Planning – We will develop forward-
looking projections for staffing and facility
requirements in 5-, 10-, and 20-year increments to
provide the City with a roadmap that anticipates
growth and change. This includes analyzing
population and service demand trends, regulatory
mandates, and emerging technologies such as
electric vehicle fleet adoption, alternative fueling
infrastructure, and renewable energy integration.

Our approach ensures the new Corporation Yard
is not only right-sized for current needs but also
adaptable to future demands, minimizing the risk of
costly retrofits and ensuring long-term resiliency.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 8
• Functional Space Standards – We will apply
industry-recognized benchmarks for municipal
service facilities as a baseline, then refine them
through the lens of Folsom’s specific operational
requirements. This includes calibrating square
footage allocations, adjacencies, and support
spaces to reflect the City’s workflows, staffing
levels, and equipment needs. By utilizing best
practices with local context, the resulting space
program will strike the right balance between
efficiency, flexibility, and operational fit, ensuring
each division can perform effectively while
maximizing long-term value.

Outcome: The resulting ne eds Assessment will
represent a validated, future-ready planning
framework that bridges past assumptions
with current realities and emerging trends. It
will provide the City with a defensible basis
for decision-making, ensuring the Corporation
Yard is right-sized, operationally efficient, and
adaptable to future change.

TASK 3 - UTILITY

IDENTIFICATION AND

COORDINATION
The 36-acre site currently lacks utility
infrastructure, requiring careful planning and
coordination. Working with our team member,
BKF Engineering, we will map, document, and
analyze all nearby utility corridors and engage
directly with providers (water, sewer, electric,
gas, telecommunications) to confirm service
capacities, extension requirements, and any
relocation challenges.

A Utility Coordination Report will be prepared,
including:
• A utility base map with topographic and record
data.
• Agency correspondence and service confirmation.
• Identification of conflicts, easements, and
relocation needs.
• Recommendations for phasing utility service to
align with site development.

By addressing utilities early, the City can avoid costly redesigns and ensure infrastructure investments
support sustainability goals, including solar readiness and EV charging infrastructure.

TASK 4 - SITE SURVEY
To support the programming, master planning,
and conceptual design effort, our team will
undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the
site through surveying efforts. This investigation
will provide the baseline technical information
necessary to inform site layout, building
placement, and cost modeling.

The survey, prepared by MnS Engineers, will
establish accurate boundary conditions and
generate a detailed topographic base map of the
project site, ensuring all future planning decisions
are grounded in precise existing conditions. The
scope will include:
• Record Boundary Survey
» Researching deeds, plats, and right-of-way
maps to establish legal boundaries.
» Recovering a minimum of three sufficient
monumentation points to confirm the Record
Boundary.
» Preparing a Record Boundary Map for project
use.
» Deliverable: Certified Record Boundary Survey
and Map in both PDF and CAD formats.
• Topographic Survey
» Field data collection using GPS and robotic
total station equipment.
» Mapping visible utilities and confirming size/
material when available.
» Producing aerial topography at 1” = 20’
planimetric scale with 1-foot contour mapping.
» Deliverable: Topographic Base Map in
AutoCAD Civil 3D and PDF formats.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 9
Assumptions:
• If a discrepancy is discovered with existing
monumentation or there is insufficient
monumentation to determine the right-of-way,
work will be paused, and the client will be
notified.
• The setting of new monuments and filing of
Record of Survey/Corner Records are not included
in this scope.

TASK 5 - CONCEPTUAL

ALTERNATIVES AND COSTING
Working with our project architect, LPA
Design Studios, we will develop up to four
distinct conceptual alternatives that illustrate
different approaches to site planning, building
configuration, and long-term adaptability.

Each alternative will serve as a “test case” to
evaluate how the Corporation Yard can most
effectively meet current and future operational
requirements while balancing sustainability, cost,
and community impacts.

Key Elements of Exploration:
• Site Layouts: Alternatives will test compact versus
dispersed operational models, exploring how
building clustering, circulation patterns, and yard
organization can influence efficiency, security, and
user convenience.
• Infrastructure Strategies: Concepts will compare
centralized service cores (fueling, wash, and
utility nodes located in one hub) against modular,
distributed strategies that allow flexibility for
growth and reduce single-point dependencies.
• Sustainability Enhancements: Each scenario will
be structured to integrate sustainable features
such as rooftop or carport-mounted solar arrays,
robust EV charging infrastructure for both
fleet and staff vehicles, stormwater harvesting
and reuse for irrigation and wash-down,
and consideration of LEED-equivalent design
strategies.
• Phasing and Expansion Potential: Alternatives
will demonstrate how the site can be
implemented in logical, buildable phases that
maintain operational continuity while also
preserving opportunities for expansion as staffing,
fleet size, and service responsibilities evolve.

TUSTIN CORPORATE YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 10
Comparative Evaluation:

For each alternative, we will prepare concept-
level cost estimates that address building
construction, site improvements, utility
infrastructure, and sustainable components.

These estimates will be paired with a
comparative evaluation matrix that highlights:
• Operational efficiencies and workflow
implications.
• Capital cost considerations.
• Scalability and ability to adapt to future
technologies, including electrification and smart-
yard applications.
• Potential permitting or environmental challenges
tied to each concept.

Outcome: This task ensures the City and
stakeholders have a clear, side-by-side
understanding of the trade-offs between
alternatives. The process empowers decision-
makers to weigh operational priorities against
financial and sustainability goals and select
a preferred direction with confidence and
transparency.

TASK 6 - PRELIMINARY SITE
PLAN
Building on stakeholder feedback, best practices
in yard planning, and direction from City Council,
our project architect, LPA Design Studios,
will refine the preferred alternative into a
comprehensive Preliminary Site Plan. This plan
will not only illustrate the physical arrangement
of facilities, but also articulate how the site will
perform as a modern, resilient, and sustainable
public works campus.

Key Features of the Plan:
• Integrated EV Infrastructure: Dedicated charging
stations for both staff and fleet vehicles will be
incorporated into parking and circulation areas,
designed to scale with future fleet electrification
goals. Service panels and conduits will be
strategically placed to minimize disruption during
future capacity upgrades.
• Solar-Ready Design & Energy Efficiency: The
site will be designed with roof and canopy areas
optimized for photovoltaic arrays, paired with
energy-efficient building systems (HVAC, lighting,
envelope) to reduce long-term operating costs.
• OSHA-Compliant Fleet Maintenance: A purpose-
built maintenance building will include service
bays sized and outfitted for both conventional
and electric vehicles, ensuring safe and efficient
servicing of an evolving fleet. Specialized
equipment, ventilation, and safety measures
will be integrated to meet OSHA standards and
emerging EV maintenance protocols.
• Battery Quarantine Zone: Recognizing the unique
hazards associated with lithium-ion batteries,
a dedicated and secure isolation area will be
included to safely store damaged or compromised
EV batteries until removal or recycling.
• Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Center: A
dual-function facility will provide safe storage
of HHW while also supporting a public reuse
program, helping the City promote sustainability
and reduce waste streams.

COVINA PUBLIC WORKS YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 11
• Fueling & Emergency Resilience: Fueling
infrastructure will include both daily-use capacity
and emergency reserves to maintain continuity
of operations during outages or regional supply
disruptions.
• Heavy- and Light-Duty Wash Stations: Wash
facilities will be designed with appropriate sizing,
water reclamation systems, and environmental
safeguards to support the full range of City fleet
vehicles.
• Future Waste Transfer Station Allocation: The
plan will reserve strategically located space for a
potential transfer station, preserving flexibility for
future operational expansion without disrupting
core yard functions.
• Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED): The design will integrate CPTED
principles to promote natural surveillance,
reinforce territorial control, and reduce
vulnerability through thoughtful site layout,
lighting, access control, and visibility.

Deliverables & Communication Tools:

The Preliminary Site Plan will be clearly
presented using visual graphics, block diagrams,
and narrative descriptions to communicate
technical detail in an accessible manner. These
materials will help both decision-makers and the
community understand the rationale behind the
layout, the operational benefits, and the long-
term adaptability of the site.

TASK 7 - ENVIRONMENTAL

DOCUMENTATION
While the annexation EIR provides baseline
environmental coverage for the site, additional
CEQA documentation will be required to support
grading, site development, and eventual
construction of the new Corporation Yard. Our
first step will be to evaluate the adequacy of the
existing CEQA record and confirm with City staff
the most efficient path forward.

At this stage, we are anticipating the City will
need to prepare an Addendum to the existing
EIR documenting that the design and future
operation of the Corporation Yard would not
result in any new environmental impacts beyond
those previously evaluated. The annexation EIR
already includes numerous mitigation measures
that will apply to the proposed project, such as:
• Preparation of an updated Wetland Delineation;
• Completion of a Phase II ESA;
• Development of a hazardous materials
contingency plan; and
• Preparation of a drainage master plan.

If Griffin Structures is selected to perform this work, we will refine the scope of services with the City to
confirm which of these technical studies are required
to support the Addendum. With the exception of the
drainage master plan (anticipated to be prepared by
others), our environmental partner Dudek is capable
of completing the necessary studies and integrating
them into the Addendum.

TUSTIN CORPORATE YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 12
Our CEQA documentation services will include:
• Preparation of the Addendum to the EIR, including
technical support and consistency analysis;
• Coordination with City staff and legal counsel to
ensure compliance and defensibility;
• Preparation of public notices and staff reports as
needed; and
• Support at public hearings with Planning
Commission and City Council.

Exclusions and Assumptions:
• This scope assumes preparation of an Addendum
only; preparation of a full Supplemental or
Program EIR is not included.
• Additional technical studies beyond those listed
above may be required if determined by the City
or regulatory agencies; these would be scoped
separately.
• Permitting outside the CEQA process (e.g., USACE,
CDFW, RWQCB approvals) is not included but can
be provided under a separate scope.

TASK 8 - GRANT FUNDING

SUPPORT
Recognizing the significant cost of a modern
Corporation Yard, our team will provide proactive
support to identify, pursue, and secure external
funding opportunities that align with the City’s
sustainability and operational priorities.

Conduct Focused Orientation
We will begin with an orientation to fully
understand the City’s clean energy and resiliency
goals as they relate to the Corporation Yard,
including fleet electrification, renewable energy,
recycling, and emergency response capabilities.

These discussions will ensure alignment with
Council direction and departmental priorities,
building a foundation for targeted funding
pursuits.

Craft a Strategic Funding Plan
Following orientation, we will prepare a strategic
funding plan that identifies priority Corporation
Yard projects and maps them to appropriate
federal, state, and regional grant programs.

This roadmap will clarify which opportunities
to pursue first, establish timelines, and help the
City maximize competitiveness.

Identify, Research, and Monitor Funding
Opportunities
We will continuously research and monitor
relevant funding streams, keeping the City
apprised of emerging opportunities and
regulatory updates. Because the scope of this
task may vary depending on available funding
programs, we have included an allowance of
hours. This allowance is intended as a baseline
and may not fully capture all potential needs
though we would be pleased to refine with the
City as appropriate. Our support will focus on
programs tied to:

EV fleet charging infrastructure
and servicing facilities.
• Solar and renewable energy systems, including
battery storage.
• Hazardous waste, recycling, and household
hazardous waste (HHW) reuse facilities.
• Resiliency measures and emergency preparedness
infrastructure.

Through a regularly updated funding matrix
and ongoing guidance, we will help the City
pursue the highest-value programs, reducing
project costs while advancing sustainability and
resiliency objectives.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 13

CONCLUSION
The development of the new Folsom Corporation
Yard represents a once in a generation
opportunity to deliver a modern operations
hub that is functional, secure, sustainable,
and fiscally responsible. This project will not
only consolidate critical City services but also
advance broader community goals around
resiliency, clean energy, and operational
efficiency.

By methodically addressing the eight defined
tasks including program validation, site survey,
CEQA documentation, and environmental
compliance while layering in stakeholder
engagement, cost and schedule realism, and
proactive funding support, our team will equip
the City of Folsom with a comprehensive
roadmap from vision to implementation. The
outcome will be a state-of-the-art facility that
supports City operations for decades to come,
balances short term project delivery with long
term lifecycle value, and positions the City as a
leader in sustainable municipal infrastructure.

ADDITIVE ALTERNATES
To further support the project, we’ve identified
several supplemental items that may be of
interest to the City as the work progresses.

These include the following:

1. Baseline Geotechnical Investigation
Our partner, Twining, will perform a geotechnical
investigation to evaluate the general geologic
and subsurface conditions of the site and
provide preliminary design recommendations to
inform conceptual planning and cost modeling.

Scope of Work:
• Advance approximately six (6) soil borings
strategically located across the site to
characterize subsurface conditions representative
of the overall property.
• Borings will extend to approximate depths of
20 to 50 feet, depending on anticipated load
conditions.
• Conduct laboratory testing on collected samples
to assess soil strength, compressibility, expansion
potential, and corrosion potential.
• Analyze field and laboratory data to develop
recommendations related to:
» Foundation and slab support parameters.
» Pavement section design for light- and heavy-
duty vehicle areas.
» Earthwork and grading, including soil
suitability and cut/fill considerations.
» Seismic design criteria in accordance with
CBC, including liquefaction and settlement
potential.
» Corrosion protection for buried utilities.

POMONA WATER RESOURCES

HEADQUARTERS AND YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. S C OPE O F W ORK 14
Assumptions:
• Investigation is intended to provide a planning-
level understanding of site conditions to support
master planning and conceptual design.
• A detailed design-phase investigation will be
required once final building layouts and structural
systems are established.
• Groundwater monitoring wells, specialized
liquefaction testing, and long term
instrumentation are excluded.

Deliverable:

A geotechnical engineering report summarizing
boring logs, laboratory test results, analyses, and
conceptual-level recommendations, provided in
PDF format.

2. Enhanced Geotechnical Investigation -
Add-on to Additive Alternate 1
This enhanced scope builds on the baseline
investigation by tailoring the analysis to the
anticipated new construction and covered
facilities envisioned in the current building
program. The expanded study will provide
building-specific design recommendations
and a more detailed assessment of subsurface
variability across functional areas of the site.

Enhanced Scope Includes:
• Advancing seven to ten (7-10) borings,
strategically distributed to represent each major
facility type and yard function.
• Incorporating supplemental shallow borings or
test pits in pavement and yard areas for improved
pavement design data.
• Performing an expanded suite of laboratory tests
to refine strength, compressibility, and corrosion
parameters.
• Providing structure-specific analyses and
recommendations, including:
» Foundation systems for one- to three-story
structures.
» Slab on-grade and mat slab design
parameters.
» Pavement section design for passenger and
heavy fleet-traffic.
» Earthwork and grading guidance with cut/fill
balance and on-site soil suitability.
» Seismic design criteria and liquefaction/
settlement potential per CBC.
» Corrosion protection strategies for underground
utilities.

Deliverable:

A comprehensive geotechnical engineering report
summarizing boring logs, laboratory results,
engineering analyses, and tailored conceptual
design recommendations aligned with the
building program. This enhanced level of study
provides a stronger technical foundation for the
architectural and structural design teams during
programming and early design development.

3. Corporate Yard Drainage Master Plan
Our partner, LPA, will prepare a drainage master
plan specific to the corporate yard site, which
would inform infrastructure design and provide
supporting documentation for the EIR and
subsequent design phases.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. SC OPE O F W ORK15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
Kickoff Meeting
Prepare Data Request
Review / Analzye Information
2STAFF AND SPACE PROJECTIONS VALIDATION & ALIGNMENT
Survey and Inventory of Space
Validation Workshops
Staff Projection Alignment
Space Projection Validation
Parking Projections
3UTILITY IDENTIFICATION AND COORDINATION
Research / Analyze Utilities w/ Providers
Draft Utility Plan
Utility Coordination Report
4SITE SURVEY
Record Boundary Survey
Topographic Survey
5CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES AND COSTING
Adjacency Diagrams / Test Fit Site Layouts
Phasing Considerations
Conceptual Statement of Probable Cost
Comparative Evaluation Matrix
6PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
Preferred Preliminary Site Plan Refinement
Updated Project Phasing / Costs
7ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
EIR Addendum - Administrative Draft
Screencheck Draft
EIR Addendum - Final Draft
Technical Reports (TBD in negotiations / discussions with the City) 8GRANT FUNDING SUPPORT
Orientation Meeting
Strategic Funding Plan
Idenfify, Research, and Monitor Funding Opportunities
Denotes meeting w/ City
Week:

Project Schedule

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
C. SC OPE O F W ORK16
Project Manager
Program Analyst
Program Analyst
Program Analyst
Cost
Estimator
Project Architect
LPA Design
Team
Project Engineer
Engineer Team
Project Engineer
Engineer Team
Principal Planner
Environ. Planner
Grants Director
Grants Team
Phase

DESCRIPTION
Dustin Alamo
Krista Beatie
Hailey Muller
Ariana Ramzian
Ryan Craven
Jeremy Hart
Blended Rate
Walter Stemberga
Blended Rate
Robert Newman
BlendedRate
ChristineKronenberg
Angelica Chiu
Alex Gibbs
Blended Rate
1 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
Kickoff Meeting
4 –
2 – –
2 –
–
–
–
–
2 –
2 –
Prepare Data Request
2 –
4 – –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Review / Analzye Information
8 4
16 4 –
2 –
2 –
2 –
2 –
2 –
2 STAFF AND SPACE PROJECTIONS VALIDATION & ALIGNMENT
Survey and Inventory of Space
8 4
24 4 –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Validation Workshops
8 –
8 – –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Staff Projection Alignment
8 40
16 8 –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Space Projection Validation
8 20
80 40
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Parking Projections
2 –
8 20
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Presentation / Revisions
8 4
16 4 –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
3 UTILITY IDENTIFICATION AND COORDINATION
Research / Analyze Utilities w/ Providers
2 –
–
– –
–
–
4 20
–
–
–
–
–
–
Draft Utility Plan
2 –
–
– –
–
–
8 24
–
–
–
–
–
–
Utility Coordination Report
4 –
–
– –
–
–
12 40
–
–
–
–
–
–
4 SITE SURVEY
Record Boundary Survey
8 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
16 40
–
–
–
–
Topographic Survey
8 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
40 80
–
–
–
–
5 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES AND COSTING
Adjacency Diagrams / Test Fit Site Layouts
8 4
16 4 –
16 80
4 8
–
–
–
–
–
–
Phasing Considerations
8 2
16 4 –
8 16
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Conceptual Statement of Probable Cost
16 –
4 –
80 8
–
–
–
4 –
–
–
–
–
Comparative Evaluation Matrix
8 4
16 4 –
8 16
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
Preferred Preliminary Site Plan Refinement
8 –
4 – –
20 40
2 4
–
–
–
–
–
–
Updated Project Phasing / Costs
16 –
8 –
20 –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
EIR Addendum - Administrative Draft
8 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
16 20
–
–
Screencheck Draft
2 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
4 12
–
–
EIR Addendum - Final Draft
2 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
4 12
–
–
Technical Reports (TBD in negotiations / discussions with the City) –
–
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8 GRANT FUNDING SUPPORT
Orientation Meeting
2 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4 8
Strategic Funding Plan
2 –
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8 16
Idenfify, Research, and Monitor Funding Opportunities
–
–
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Subtotal Hours
160 82 238 92 100 64 152 32 96 62 120 28 44
16 24
CEQA Specialist

TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Project Manager / Needs Assessment / Cost Estimator
Architect
Utility Specialist
Civil Engineer
Grant Funds Specialist

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

LPA DESIGN STUDIOS

BKF ENGINEERS

MNS ENGINEERS
DUDEK
Task and Subtask Summary Table

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

MAINTENANCE YARD & PUMP STATION
D. CONSULTANT AND SUB-CONSULTANT STAFF

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESD. C O n SULTA n T A n D S U BCO n SULTA n T S T AFF 17

NAME COMPANY ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES
Dustin Alamo,

CCM, DBIA,

LEED AP
Griffin
Structures
Project
Manager
Vice President
Dustin Alamo, using his extensive
Corporate Yard experience, will serve
as the Project Manager working directly
our proposed team and City to ensure
successful delivery.

Hailey Muller Griffin
Structures
Program
Analyst
Hailey Muller will support the project as
lead for Task 2 using her experience with
Corporate Yards to update the facility
needs assessment.

Ariana
Ramzian
Griffin
Structures
Program
Analyst
Ariana Ramzian will use her background
in Corporate and Maintenance Yard
programming to support space
projections on the project.

Krista Beatie,
CMIT
Griffin
Structures
Program
Analyst
Krista Beatie will support the staff
projection portion of the project. Krista
has successfully worked on numerous
Corporate Yards and City Projects
coordinating staffing needs.

Ryan Craven,

CPE, CMIT
Griffin
Structures
Cost
Estimator
Ryan Craven will use his expertise in
estimating to lead the cost modeling
and ensure Folsom’s fiscal objectives are
achieved in the project budget.

Ben Santos,
PLS BKF Engineers Utility
Specialist
Ben Santos will lead Task 3 of the
project. With 24 years of experience
managing utility location, he will oversee
the utility connection opportunities and
Utility Coordination Report.

Robert
ne wman, PE MnS Engineers Civil Engineer
Lead
As Lead Civil Engineer, Robert will
prepare Task 4, Site Survey using his
46 years of experience and team of
engineers to produce a detailed site
report.

Jeremy Hart,
AIA, LEED AP, BD+C,
nCARB
LPA Design
Studios
Project
Architect
As Project Architect, Jeremy will use his
Corporate Yard experience to coordinate
the design team and the city leading the
conceptual designs and a preliminary site
plan for the project (Tasks 5 & 6).

Project Team
Griffin Structures collaborates closely with our utility locators, engineers, architects, environmental planners, and grant specialists to ensure effective communication between the team, that design concepts are translated into practical, constructible plans aligned with client expectations, and information gathered is routinely shared and coordinated across each task in the project. We work in tandem with the City to coordinate the project monitoring site assessment activity, capturing progress, and working collectively to deliver projects on schedule and in budget. Our primary goal is to streamline all aforementioned collaborative efforts, ensuring a well-executed project which aligns with client expectations, operating as one team and as an overall extension of client staff.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
D. C O n SULTA n T A n D S U BCO n SULTA n T S T AFF 18

NAME COMPANY ROLE /

TITLE RESPONSIBILITIES
Christine
Kronenberg Dudek CEQA Planner
Christine has 29 years of experience
focused on CEQA compliance. She will lead
Task 7, Environmental Documentation, by
coordinating with City staff to prepare an
addendum to the
existing EIR.

Angelica Chiu Dudek Environ.

Planner
Angelica specializes in CEQA
documentation and will use her experience
on public projects in California to support
Task 7 by coordinating environmental
compliance on the project.

Alex Gibbs Townsend
Public Affairs
Grants
Specialist
Alex’s 15 years of experience in public
policy and has successfully worked with
cities to obtain millions in grant funding.

Alex will lead Task 8 of the project, Grant

Funding Support.

Paul Soltis, PE,
GE
Twining
Consulting
Sr.

Geotechnical
Engineer
Paul Soltis supports the optional
Additive Alternates using his 33 years of
experience. Paul will use his Geotechnical
background to investigate any subsurface
conditions and provide preliminary design
recommendations.

Adrian Moreno,
PE
Twining
Consulting
Project
Engineer
Adrian Moreno will support Paul in
Additive Alternates monitoring field testing
and laboratory data output in preparation
of geotechnical recommendations.

Jon Browning,

PG, CEG
Twining
Consulting
Cert.

Engineering
Geologist
Jon Browning has over 20 years experience
in engineering geology and environmental
consulting. He will support Twining by
leveraging his knowledge of engineering
techniques to mitigate geological hazards.

Liangcai He,
PhD, GE
Twining
Consulting
Chief
Geotechnical
Engineer
Liangcai He brings 33 years of expertise
in earthquake engineering, soil-structure,
and earthwork supporting the geotechnical
investigation of the project.

Hossein
Bahmyari, PhD
Fellow, DGE, PE
Twining
Consulting
Sr.

Geotechnical
Engineer
Hossein Bahmyari will use his extensive
experience to support the Twining team
with Alternates by providing compliance
oversight of specifications and standards
for the geotechnical investigation.

Project Team

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURES 19
Project Team Organization Chart

CORE PROJECT TEAM
Dustin Alamo

CCM, LEED AP, DRE
Project Manager
Ben Santos
PLS
Utility Specialist
BKF Engineering
Paul Soltis

CCM, LEED AP, DRE
Geo Engineering
Twining Consulting
Robert ne wman

PE, PLS
Civil Engineer
MnS Engineering
Christine Kronenberg
CEQA Specialist
Dudek
Alex Gibbs
Grants Specialist
Townsend Public
Affairs

PROJECT SUPPORT
TEAM
Jeremy Hart
AIA, LEED AP BD+C, nC ARB
Project Architect
LPA Design Studios
Ariana Ramzian
Program Analyst
Krista Beatie
CMIT
Program Analyst
Ryan Craven

CPE, CMIT
Project Manager
Hailey Muller
Program Analyst
Task 3 Lead
Task 2 Lead
Task 4 LeadOptional
Task 5 & 6 LeadTask 7 LeadTask 8 Lead

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

MORGAN HILL CORPORATE YARD
E. CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS AND REFERENCES

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESE. C O n SULTA n T Q U ALIFICATIO n S A n D R E FERE n C ES 20

DESCRIPTION
Griffin Structures assessed the feasibility of a shared Corporate Yard facility for the County of San Mateo, and the Cities of Belmont, San Carlos, and Redwood City,
consolidating their existing yards that support essential public works functions. To assess the feasibility of a
joint-use yard, the study evaluated the 17.33-acre County- owned site that offers sufficient area to accommodate a consolidated facility. The team explored various facility management models presenting governance frameworks for
a shared facility. A proposed program for the joint facility supported consolidated services with suggestions for more efficient operations to streamline work processes. The study evaluated the logistical, operational, and financial viability of this joint facility, focusing on streamlining operations, enhancing resource sharing, and optimizing space while
addressing each city’s specific needs.

The final program consisted of 130,000 SF in building space with a total of 12.6 acres in development and a preliminary construction cost of $315 million. The study culminates in a comprehensive program, governance framework, timeline,
and preliminary budget, giving the four jurisdictions a robust foundation to evaluate the future of a shared corporate yard.

VALUE + SIZE
$315,000,000 | 130,000 SF
CLIENT + CONTACT
County of San Mateo
Justin Mates
Deputy County Executive
(650) 363-4136
[email protected]

COMPLETION DATE
July 2025

REPRESENTATIVE TEAM MEMBERS
• Dustin Alamo, CCM, DBIA, LEED AP
• Hailey Muller
• Krista Beatie, CMIT
• Ariana Ramzian
• Ryan Craven, CPE, CMIT
San Mateo Joint Corporate Yard Pre-Development
SA n MATEO, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
E. C O n SULTA n T Q U ALIFICATIO n S A n D R E FERE n C ES 21

DESCRIPTION
Griffin Structures provided Program and Construction
Management for the new Tustin Corporate Yard and
Emergency Operations Center. The project consisted
of demolition of an existing fire station and facilities maintenance office trailers; and construction of a new
17,284 SF corporate yard office building including a state- of-the-art Emergency Operations Center, back up emergency dispatch center, and RACES (Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service) room.

The facility includes a new wellness center for City staff use, locker rooms, new water lab, facilities maintenance offices, break room, and conference rooms. The project also encompasses new covered parking, photo voltaics, and a
new landscape demonstration garden.

VALUE + SIZE
$16,000,000 | 18,000 SF
CLIENT + CONTACT
City of Tustin
Jason Churchill
Deputy Public Works Director
(714) 573-3355
[email protected]

TESTIMONIAL
“Over the past several years, the City of Tustin
has enjoyed working with Griffin Structures, as
they have provided the City with excellent and
responsive service.”
-City of Tustin

COMPLETION DATE
June 2018

REPRESENTATIVE TEAM MEMBERS
• Dustin Alamo, CCM, DBIA, LEED AP
• Ryan Craven, CPE, CMIT
• Jeremy Hart, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, nCARB
Tustin Water Administration Building, Corporate Yard &
Emergency Operations Center
CITY OF TUSTI n , CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
E. C O n SULTA n T Q U ALIFICATIO n S A n D R E FERE n C ES 22

DESCRIPTION
Griffin Structures is assisting the county of Santa Cruz in the development of a Facilities Plan that will guide the District’s investment in current and future facilities. The D.A. Porath Sanitation Facility is an existing property that serves as the primary pumping station between the eastern County sewer system and the City of Santa Cruz Treatment Plant. There are three buildings on the 7.4-acre property: Pump Building, Services Building, and Storage Warehouse. D.A. Porath is located at 2750 Lode Street within the community of Live Oak in the unincorporated County.

The District also plans to acquire a smaller satellite
operations facility in the southern portion of the District’s service range. Therefore, the Facilities Plan is needed to strategically allocate District resources between the two facilities and guide acquisition of the future satellite Operations Facility and development of Master Plans.

The scope of work generally includes the following project components/phases:
• Programming ne eds Analysis
• Operations and Staffing Plan
• Environmental Analysis of satellite Operations Facility property • Master Plan for satellite Operations Facility
• Master Plan for D.A. Porath Facility
VALUE + SIZE
$20,000,000 | 28,000 SF
CLIENT + CONTACT
County of Santa Cruz
Travis Cary
Director of Capital Projects
(831) 454-2339
[email protected]

COMPLETION DATE
September 2021

REPRESENTATIVE TEAM MEMBERS
• Dustin Alamo, CCM, DBIA, LEED AP
• Ariana Ramzian
• Ryan Craven, CPE, CMIT
• Jeremy Hart, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, nCARB
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District Facilities Plan
CITY OF SA n T A CRUZ, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
E. C O n SULTA n T Q U ALIFICATIO n S A n D R E FERE n C ES 23

DESCRIPTION
Griffin was initially selected by the to develop a Space ne eds Analysis for the relocation of the City’s Public Works Maintenance Yard. Subsequent to the Space ne eds Analysis, Griffin Structures also provided Program and Construction Management services for the maintenance yard relocation.

The project involves two phases: (1) Phase 1 of the project will include site improvements at three separate locations throughout the City.

The improvements will include new material bins; new
waste disposal facilities; steel canopies for protection of materials for compliance with WQMP requirements; the
construction of a new Bomb Squad storage facility complete with CCTV; evidence vehicle storage; security fencing; and mechanical, electrical and plumbing improvements. (2)
Phase 2 will encompass the comprehensive renovation of
the existing storage warehouse into office facilities for the relocation of facility maintenance staff, traffic control staff, theater scene assembly facility, structural retrofit, and the construction of a new mechanical mezzanine.

VALUE + SIZE
$18,000,000 | 40,000 SF
CLIENT + CONTACT
City of Walnut Creek
Rich Payne
Public Services Manager
(925) 943-5899 x2437
[email protected]

COMPLETION DATE
June 2016

REPRESENTATIVE TEAM MEMBERS
• Dustin Alamo, CCM, DBIA, LEED AP
Walnut Creek Public Works Yard
CITY OF WAL n UT CREEK, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
E. C O n SULTA n T Q U ALIFICATIO n S A n D R E FERE n C ES 24

DESCRIPTION
Griffin Structures teamed with LPA Architects to modernize the City of Hayward’s Corporation Yard addressing the
evolving needs of the Public Works Utilities Division and Maintenance Services Department. The team is providing
an in-depth needs assessment, site evaluation, master
plan, building program, conceptual design, and a phased construction plan to ensure uninterrupted operations. Key focal points of the project include enhancing circulation and parking capacity on the site, developing long term storage solutions, and a design focused on sustainable elements.

The final plan will provide the City of Hayward with a
flexible plan to support operations for years to come.

VALUE + SIZE
In Progress
CLIENT + CONTACT
City of Hayward
Alex Ameri
Director of Public Works
(510) 583-4700
[email protected]

COMPLETION DATE
Ongoing

REPRESENTATIVE TEAM MEMBERS
• Dustin Alamo, CCM, DBIA, LEED AP
• Hailey Muller
• Krista Beatie, CMIT
• Ariana Ramzian
• Ryan Craven, CPE, CMIT
• Jeremy Hart, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, nCARB
Hayward Corporate Yard

HAYWARD, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

STANTON CORPORATE YARD
F. TEAM RESUMES

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESF. T E AM R E SUMES 25
Dustin Alamo
CCM, DBIA, LEED AP, DRE BROKER #01930629
Vice President, Strategic Services

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture, University of
Colorado, Boulder

CERTIFICATION
Certified Construction Manager (CCM)
Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA)
Associate
LEED Accredited Professional
State of California Licensed Real Estate
Broker DRE #01930629

AFFILIATIONS
Construction Management Association of
America, Member
Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA),
Member
U.S. Green Building Council, Member

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
21 QUALIFICATIONS
Dustin serves as the Vice President of Strategic Services for Griffin Structures, Inc. His primary responsibilities include the executive management of all needs assessment and master planning projects ranging by facility type, including corporate yards, administration facilities, library and cultural arts buildings, law enforcement facilities, fire safety facilities, community and senior centers, utility facilities, and others. In addition, Dustin is skilled at developing long-term facility plans (ranging from $10M to $400M) which incorporate future space requirements, phasing considerations, and capital funding mechanisms such as bonds, repositioning real estate assets, and public private partnerships (P3).

With a formal background in architecture, Dustin is
knowledgeable in aspects of design. He understands the process and skill-set required for developing and building architectural programs, site plans, floor plans, elevations, and technical detailing. Dustin is a Certified Construction Manager (CCM), LEED accredited professional and a licensed Real Estate Broker in the state of California.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
San Mateo Joint Corporate Use Yard, CA
Tustin Water Administration Building, Corporate Yard & Emergency Operations Center, CA
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District Maintenance Yard & Pump Station, CA
Whittier Corporate Yard, CA
Walnut Creek Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Hayward Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Stanton Corporate Yard, CA
Westminster Corporate Yard, CA
Pomona Water Resources Headquarters & Yard, CA
Jurupa Community Services Dist. Facility Pre-Development, CA Morgan Hill Maintenance & Ops. Yard Pre-Development, CA Rancho Palos Verdes Corporate Yard Pre-Development Services, CA ne wport Beach Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Orange Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Salinas Maintenance Yard Pre-Development, CA
San Dimas Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 26
Hailey Muller
Program Analyst

EDUCATION
Master of Data Analytics, Oregon State
University
Bachelor of Business Planning & Market
Analysis, Whitworth University

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
9 QUALIFICATIONS
Hailey Muller is a Program Analyst specializing in dynamic and adaptable plans that support changing needs through the optimization of facility and land use. Her work for public sector and higher education planning projects utilize flexible programming principles in support of comprehensive master plans, space utilization studies, and design projects. Hailey’s background in data-driven analytics is supported by her master’s studies in data science, paired with ten years of experience in the facilities planning industry, which allows her to guide the planning process towards the highest and best use of space.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
San Mateo Joint Corporate Use Yard, CA
Hayward Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Whittier Corporate Yard, CA
Laguna Beach Corporate Yard Master Plan, CA
Oregon State University Facilities Yard, OR
Manteca Police Headquarters, CA
Manteca Fire Station #6
Oregon State Police Central Point, OR
Chaffey Community College District Master Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District
Amendment 5 Program Moves, El Cajon, CA
Cuyamaca Space Utilization, Rancho San Diego, CA
Space Utilization Studies, El Cajon, CA
Riverside Community College District IETTC Master Plan, CA San Bernardino Community College District Facilities Master Plan, CA Bucknell University Lower Campus Planning Study, Lewisburg, PA Cuyahoga Community College Master Plan, Highland Hills, OH Des Moines Area Community College Master Plan, Ankeny, IA Florida International University Campus Master Plan, Miami, FL Lane College Campus Master Plan, Jacksonville, FL
Marist College Campus Plan Update, Poughkeepsie, nY
Oregon State University Off-Site Space Utilization Study, OR University of Washington Space Utilization Study, WA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 27
Ariana Ramzian
Program Analyst

EDUCATION
Master of Arts, Interior Architecture &
Design, Academy of Art University
Bachelor of Science, Managerial
Economics, University of California, Davis

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
7 QUALIFICATIONS
As part of Griffin Structures’ Strategic Services division, Ariana is an experienced space planner. Her background in providing needs assessments and auditing allows for Ariana to effectively interview stakeholders, analyze data, and formulate conclusions and recommendations on operational efficiencies. As a Project Analyst at Griffin, Ariana utilizes her process skills to then prepare staff and space projections while organizing an assortment of detailed documentation in an orderly, logical manner. Ariana develops building and needs assessments, feasibility studies, master plans, and technical reports. Ariana is an excellent communicator whose strengths include synthesizing complex data into tables, charts, and narratives which are easily comprehended by a variety of stakeholders.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
San Mateo Joint Corporate Use Yard, CA
Hayward Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District Maintenance Yard & Pump Station, CA
Morgan Hill Corporate Yard, CA
Laguna Beach Corporate Yard Master Plan, CA
Whittier Corporate Yard, CA
Jurupa Community Services District Maint. & Water Treatment Yard, CA ne wport Beach Corporate Yard, CA
County of Orange Facilities Strategic Plan, CA
San Bernardino County Downtown Master Plan, CA
San Jacinto Civic Center, CA
Eastvale Civic Center & City Hall, CA
Laguna Beach City Hall, CA
OCERS Headquarters, Santa Ana, CA
San Juan Capistrano Paseo Adelanto Mixed-Use Housing & City Hall, CA Cupertino 1045 Torre Avenue Building Renovation (Interim City Hall), CA Morgan Hill Butterfield Fire Station, CA
Tustin Police Department, CA
Monterey Public Safety Facility Feasibility Study, CA
San Ramon Fire Protection District Training Facility, CA Escondido Public Library Infrastructure & Modernization Project, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 28
Krista Beatie
CMIT
Program Analyst

EDUCATION
Master of Interior Architecture, Chatham
University
Bachelor of Science, Brigham Young
University

CERTIFICATION
Construction Manager in Training (CMIT)

AFFILIATIONS
Construction Real Estate Women (CREW)
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC)

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
8 QUALIFICATIONS
As a Program Analyst for Griffin Structures, Krista Beatie serves in our Strategic Services division to assist the Griffin Structures team to provide early programming for all client types. With a Master’s in Interior Architecture at Chatham University, Krista Beatie has served on a variety of project types, from public safety facilities, educational institutions to commercial architecture and design.

Through her education and experience, Krista has developed a passion for sustainability and holistic design, assisting her clients to realize the full potential of their space.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
San Mateo Joint Corporate Use Yard, CA
Hayward Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Whittier City Yard, CA
Morgan Hill Corporate Yard, CA
Laguna Beach Corporate Yard Master Plan, CA
OC Mosquito & Vector Control District, CA
Rancho Palos Verdes Maintenance Yard, CA
Anaheim Civic Center, CA
Los Alamitos Civic Center, CA
Menifee City Hall, CA
Laguna Beach City Hall, CA
San Bernardino County Downtown Master Plan, CA
San Bernardino County Facilities Strategic Plan, CA
Orange County Facilities Master Plan, CA
San Jacinto Civic Center, CA
Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS) Headquarters, CA Mountain View Corporate Center, Ogden, UT
Rocky Mountain Advisory Offices TI, Salt Lake City, UT
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Offices TI, Sat Lake City, UT UMB Bank Offices TI, Ogden, UT
UPMA Regent Street Lobbies, Salt Lake City, UT
Method Communications TI, Salt Lake City, UT
nort h Tooele Fire Station 61, UT

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 29
Ryan Craven

CPE, CMIT
Cost Estimator

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Construction
Engineering, national U niversity, Costa
Mesa

CERTIFICATION
Certified Public Estimator (CPE)
Construction Manager in Training (CMIT)

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Plumbing Engineers
(ASPE)
Corenet Glob al (Young Leaders Group)

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
17 QUALIFICATIONS
Ryan is an expert in value engineering and construction cost estimating, including master planning, conceptual, schematic design development, and construction document phases. He is a skilled mediator, participating in change order preparation, validation, and negotiation. He has reconciliation experience with general contractors and subcontractors, and communicates well with all design team members, promoting open-door dialogue and effective project solutions.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
San Mateo Joint Corporate Use Yard, CA
Hayward Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
County of Orange Civic Center, Santa Ana, CA
Morgan Hill Maintenance & Ops. Yard Pre-Development, CA Tiburon Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District Facilities Plan, CA Tustin Water Administration Building, Corporate Yard & Emergency Operations Center, CA
Westminster Corporate Yard, CA
Ontario Municipal Service Center, CA
Stanton Corporate Yard, CA
Pomona Water Resources Headquarters & Yard, CA
Alameda City Aquatic Center Pre-Development, CA
East Bay Regional Park District, Public Safety & Administration Building Renovation, CA
Rancho Palos Verdes Civic Center (Community Center, Plaza, EOC/ Maintenance Yard, Sheriff Substation, Council Chambers), CA Access Services, Antelope Valley Paratransit (Fleet) Operations & Maintenance Facility
UC Santa Barbara Cabrillo Park Fleet Management & Corporate Yard Pre- Development, CA
Salinas Maintenance Yard Pre-Development, CA
Westminster Public Safety Training Center, CA
Cathedral City Fire Station no . 411, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 30
Jeremy Hart
AIA, LEED AP BD+C, nCARB
Principal-in-Charge

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture
Cal Poly Pomona

CERTIFICATION
Licensed Architect, California
no . 29148
LEED Accredited Professional

AFFILIATIONS
American Institute of Architects
U.S. Green Building Council

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
26 QUALIFICATIONS
As Director of Civic + Cultural at LPA, Jeremy Hart designs with discovery and impact in mind. With more than 25 years of experience, he believes that the direction of design should reflect the will of the community.

As an architect and a history buff, Jeremy is driven by the desire to create and influence our environment in a meaningful way. He asserts that architects’ ability to create meaningful impressions on people can influence a community, interactions and the surrounding environment. Jeremy approaches each project like a puzzle that needs to be solved, uncovering each factor that may contribute to a project. Jeremy strives to learn how the project site and environment will inform the functional requirements of the building program and the values of the community.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District Master Plan, CA
Tustin Water Administration Building, Corporate Yard & Emergency Operations Center, CA
Laguna Beach Corporate Yard Master Plan, CA
ne wport Beach Corporate Yard Pre-Development, CA
Irvine Fire Station no .20, CA
Cathedral City Fire Station no . 411, CA
Salinas Police Services Headquarters, CA
Campbell Police Department Headquarters, CA
Chino Hills Government Center & City Hall, CA
Hesperia Police Department Headquarters, CA
County of Orange Civic Center Facilities Strategic Plan, Santa Ana, CA County of Orange Admin North Coun ty of Orange Admin South San Bernardino County, CA
Government Center Public Def enders’ Building
High Desert Government Center Public Safety Operations Center Valley Communication Center 222 H ospitality Building Brentwood City Hall & Council Chambers, CA
Hesperia Civic Center (City Hall & Library), CA
West Hollywood Aquatics & Recreation Center, CA
Laguna niguel Crown Valley Civic Center, CA
Chino Hills Library, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 31
Ben Santos
PLS
City Utility Locating Manager

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Geodetic
Engineering, University of the
Philippines Diliman

CERTIFICATION
Professional Land Surveyor, CA
#9251

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
24 QUALIFICATIONS
Ben has 24 years of professional experience in
surveying, and will manage utility locating processes.

He is a licensed Geodetic Engineer with experience in
control surveys and ground deformation studies. His
responsibilities include preparation of Topographic
Surveys, Differential Leveling Surveys, ALTA/NSPS
Surveys, Boundary Surveys, Subdivision Maps, Elevation
Certificates, Corner Records, Record of Survey Maps,
Plats & Legal Descriptions. Ben works directly with
computer-aided drafting and design (CADD) using
Autodesk Civil 3D, and has extensive experience
working with aerial mapping, digital photogrammetry,
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographic
Information Systems (GIS). He has been involved with
utility locating and mapping for numerous projects.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Bridge Housing Corp. Mayfair Affordable Development
Utility Locating, El Cerrito, CA

Chabot/Las Positas Community College District Utility
Locating, Livermore, CA
Palo Alto Utility Survey, Palo Alto, CA
City of Santa Clara On-Call Surveying/GIS & Utility
Locating, Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara County Fairgrounds Site Utilities
Assessment, Santa Clara, CA
Cormorant Energy LLC Cow Palace Utility Locating,
Daly City, CA
County of Santa Cruz On-Call Utility, Santa Cruz, CA
Google LLC Midpoint MP Utility Locating Services, San
Jose, CA
Stanford Health Care MRI Trailer Utilities, San Jose, CA John Muir Health WCMC Utility Mapping, Walnut
Creek, CA
PG&E Utility Locating & BIM Modeling, Davis, CA
Strada Investment Group Centre Pointe Business Park
Utility Locating, Walnut Creek CA
USF Project Management University of San Francisco
Utility Staking, San Francisco, CA
Lendlease 30 Van nes s Topo & Utility Locating Survey,
San Francisco, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 32
Robert ne wman

PE, PLS
Civil Engineer

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Cal Poly Pomona
Masters of Public Administration,
CSU nort hridge

CERTIFICATION
PE, Civil Engineering, CA #51733 |
PLS, CA #6696

AWARDS & AFFILIATIONS
APWA Top Ten Leader - national
Award
President, APWA SoCal Chapter &
LA City County Engineers Assoc.

President, League of Cities Public
Works Officers Department
President, CIty and County
Engineers Association, LA County
Board Member, League of Cities
Executive Board

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
46 QUALIFICATIONS
Robert is a Licensed Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor
with more than 46 years of experience leading public
infrastructure, site development, and facility planning projects across California. As a former Public Works
Director and seasoned consultant, he has successfully
delivered over $1 billion in capital improvement
programs, including complex roadway, stormwater,
and civic facility projects. Robert brings deep expertise in coordinating with multiple agencies, managing
right-of-way acquisition and entitlement processes,
and guiding development impact assessments. His
collaborative leadership and technical insight have
supported long-range planning efforts, Community
Facilities District (CFD) formation, and the successful execution of high-profile public and private projects.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Canyon Country Community Center, Santa Clarita, CA
Cooper Street Parking Structure, Santa Clarita, CA
Fair Oaks Planning & Fiscal Impact Analysis, Santa
Clarita, CA
Golden Valley Ranch Planning & Fiscal Analysis, Santa
Clarita, CA
nort h Valencia II Planning & Fiscal Analysis, Santa
Clarita, CA
Olsen Ranch Development, Paso Robles, CA
Beechwood Development, Paso Robles, CA
The Landing Engineering & Utility Coordination, Paso
Robles, CA
10th Street West Widening Project, Palmdale, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 33
Christine Kronenberg
Principal Planner

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Administration, Political
Science, University of Colorado
Boulder
Masters of City Planning, San Diego
State University

AWARDS & AFFILIATIONS
American Planning Association

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
29 QUALIFICATIONS
Christine Kronenberg is a principal with 29 years’
experience preparing and managing a range of
projects primarily focused on compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Christine
has been responsible for preparation of environmental
documents throughout nort hern California for both
public- and private-sector clients. She has experience
working in a range of geographies and on highly
controversial and complex projects. Her environmental
project experience includes General Plan and
Specific Planning projects and urban and greenfield
development, including large-scale annexation
projects. She manages the preparation of all types
of environmental documents and understands the
importance of meeting project deadlines, schedules,
and budgets. Christine expertly identifies issues
that require immediate attention and effectively
communicates with project participants, keeping them
informed throughout the process to keep projects on
schedule and within budget.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Dowdell Industrial Park MnD, Rohnert Park CA
Aviator and East Monte Vista Warehouse MnD,
Vacaville, CA
Alamo Mixed Use Modified IS/15183 Checklist,
Vacaville, CA
Maverik Gas Station Mitigated ne gative Declaration,
CartWright Engineering, Sacramento, CA
Holiday Inn and Suites MnD, Rohnert Park, CA
Maverick Store at Granite Regional MnD, Sacramento
CA
Conco Warehouse Development Initial Study/15183
Checklist, Vacaville, CA
Vaca Valley Hotel Project MnD, Vacaville, CA
Fairgrounds Subdivision Project MnD, Sacramento, CA
Farmstead Project Modified IS/15183 Checklist,
Vacaville, CA
Roseville Hotel and Conference Center EIR, Roseville,
CA
Addendum to the Kaiser South Sacramento Medical
Expansion EIR, Sacramento, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 34
Angelica Chiu
Environmental Planner

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Environmental
Policy and Planning, University of
California Davis

AWARDS & AFFILIATIONS
Association of Environmental
Planners

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
6 QUALIFICATIONS
Angelica Chiu is an environmental planner with
6 years’ experience specializing in California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document
preparation and compliance, as well as project
coordination for both public and private sector clients throughout California. Angelica provides analytical
support and project management assistance to
senior staff for a variety of projects, including new
residential, hotel, commercial, mixed-use, and
warehouse developments. She also has experience
with education projects, public utilities projects, and statewide programs. Angelica facilitates timely and
efficient completion of project deliverables with quality assurance.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Industrial Wastewater Reclamation Facility EIR,
Gonzales, CA
Blue Ridge at Suisun Valley IS/15183 Checklist,
Fairfield, CA
Sun Grove and Mendes Park Site Master Plan
Addendums, Elk Grove, CA
Orange Apartments and Retail Development IS/15183
Checklist, Vacaville, CA
Orange Apartments and Retail Development IS/15183
Checklist, Vacaville, CA
Kaiser Permanente Fresno Medical Office Building
IS/15183 Checklist, Fresno, CA
San Francisco Fell Street Department of Motor Vehicles
Field Office IS, San Francisco, CA
Inspire Charter School Addendum, Chico, CA
Conco Warehouse Development Project IS/15183
Checklist, Vacaville, CA
Neal Road Recycling and Waste Facility Composting IS/
nD, Butte County, CA
Dowdell Industrial Park IS/MND, Rohnert Park, CA
Aviator and East Monte Vista WarehouSE IS/MND,
Vacaville, CA
nort h San Pedro Park & Bassett Park Master Plan EIR,
San Jose, CA
Sierra College Lighting Project IS & nD, Rocklin, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 35
Alex Gibbs
Grants Director

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Politics, University
of San Francisco
Masters of Geotechnical Engineering
University of Colorado

CERTIFICATION
Professional Grant Writing
Certification, San Diego State
University

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
15 QUALIFICATIONS
Alex brings 15 years of experience in public policy and legislative advocacy to TPA. Alex has four years of
experience working for the State Legislature, analyzing, researching, writing, and shepherding bills through the legislative process. Alex has also secured significant
grant funding for clients throughout California. Alex
has expertise in the policy sectors of parks and
recreation, natural resources, local governance, public safety, and transportation.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
In addition to his expertise in parks and recreation,
transportation, and public safety, Alex has a strong
network of relationships with State Legislators, key
staff, and various state departments and agencies.

Some of his accomplishments include:

Ale x coordinated with County of Kern staff to
secure over $17 million in grant funding from the
Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Grant
Program administered by the California Department
of Health Care Services to establish a youth crisis
walk-in center facility. Alex crafted a competitive
application and leveraged a strategic network of
agency relationships to ensure the project’s success.

The critical funding will allow the County to continue
to expand its capacity to provide alternatives to
incarceration, hospitalization, homelessness, and
institutionalization.

Ale x worked closely with the City of Oakland staff to
secure $7 million in grant funding from the Clean CA
Local Grant Program. Alex leveraged relationships
with the California Department of Transportation
and the City’s legislative delegation to advocate for
two funded projects successfully. This funding helped
the City of Oakland conduct the Courtland Creek
Restoration Project and the Oakland Mini Parks
Beautification Project, which provided significant
remediation and beautification of public resources
for residents.

Ale x worked with the City of San Leandro to
secure $4.5 million in grant funding from the
Building Forward Library Infrastructure Program
administered by the California State Library to
upgrade libraries throughout the City. Alex tailored
the grant application’s message and narrative and
worked with City staff to create a project budget and
timeline to ensure competitiveness.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 36
Paul Soltis
PE, GE
Project Executive, Senior
Geotechnical Engineer

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
Masters of Geotechnical Engineering
University of Colorado

CERTIFICATION
PE, CA #56140 | GE, CA #2606

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
33 QUALIFICATIONS
Paul Soltis, PE, GE, brings more than 33 years of
technical expertise to Twining. His experience includes geotechnical investigations and analyses relative
to roads, bridges, highways, and other California
infrastructure projects. His focus is on interaction with the design team during development of construction
documents to achieve the most appropriate foundation
type and most efficient site preparation techniques.

Paul has extensive on-call contract management
experience and the proven ability to simultaneously
maintain and manage multiple projects. Paul is
responsible for the technical oversight of the firm’s
geotechnical projects and management of the firm’s
geotechnical personnel.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
On-Call Geotechnical Engineering and Material Testing
Services, Millbrae, CA
Twining recently completed a three-year contract to provide all services and work required to review geotechnical reports, slope stability review, field materials testing, and laboratory materials testing. Task orders under this contract included both design and construction services for sanitary sewers, storm and water mains, roadways, grading, drainage, paving, and park and building facilities. Paul served as the Geotechnical Engineer of Record for this contract.

Almond Grove Street Reconstruction Project - Phase 1
& 2, Los Gatos, CA
P aul provided senior project engineering for phase 1 and 2 of this rehabilitation project, which consisted of removal and replacement of all sidewalks, curb, gutter, driveways and accessibility ramps, and the removal and replacement of the concrete, removing the north side of the streets in sections before moving on to the removal and replacement of the south side of the streets.

Cochran Street Bridge Widening, Simi Valley, CA
P aul provided Senior Geotechnical Engineering oversight during the design of the bridge widening at the Llajas Creek overcrossing. Twining provided geotechnical field investigation in support of the design of bridge foundations consisting of cast-indrilled- hole (CIDH) piles. The work was performed for the City of Simi Valley utilizing Caltrans design and construction standards. The investigation was performed in limited access conditions with the presence of active traffic and required coordination with the County of Ventura Flood Control District.

Paul served as the GE of Record for the project.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 37
Adrian Moreno
PE
Project Engineer

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona

CERTIFICATION
PE, CA #87057

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
12 QUALIFICATIONS
Adrian Moreno, PE, brings over 12 years of technical
expertise to Twining. He excels at geotechnical
engineering functions at any project stage, from the
management of subsurface investigations, laboratory
testing programs, and the preparation of geotechnical
and foundation recommendation reports during
the design phase, to the management of quality
control testing and inspection programs during the
construction phase of projects. Adrian has managed
several complex projects, from initial authorization
to completion, and is familiar with all aspects of
project management, including client interaction, work
scheduling reviewing of field and laboratory data,
establishing and monitoring project budget, invoicing,
and quality control.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Walerga Road Bridge Replacement, County of Placer,
CA
The Placer County Department of Public Works is replacing the existing bridge on Walerga Road over Dry Creek, approximately three miles west of the City of Roseville between Baseline Road and PFE Road.. Twining provided quality control materials testing and inspection services on the project. Adrian provided project engineering, overseeing testing and inspections.

I-10/Rancho Avenue Eastbound Widening Project,
Colton, CA
T his project consisted of evaluating the subsurface conditions at the site and providing recommendations for widening
the existing on-ramp and constructing a new retaining
wall. Twining developed a subsurface exploration program, laboratory testing, and engineering analysis for the completion of the design, construction documents, and permit applications.

As the Project Engineer, Adrian took on site soil samples, made observations, and assisted in the preparation of the geotechnical recommendations report.

Shoemaker Bridge Replacement, Long Beach, CA
Sho emaker Bridge is an extension of Shoreline Drive in Long Beach that traverses the Los Angeles River. Adrian is serving as a staff engineer during the design of the bridge and performs sampling and analysis and prepares reports. Samples and information from the borings and CPTs will be used to develop deep foundation recommendations for support of abutments and the bridge span over the river. Additional borings and CPTs on the land side will be performed to develop geotechnical recommendations for retaining walls and new pavements.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 38
Jon Browning

PG, CEG
Certified Engineering Geologist

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Administration,
Geography, Emphasis in
Environmental and natur al
Resources, San Diego State
University
GIS Certificate, San Diego Mesa
College

CERTIFICATION
PG, CA #9012 | CEG, CA #2615

AWARDS & AFFILIATIONS
Association of Environmental and
Engineering Geologists (AEG)
San Diego Association of Geologists

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
20 QUALIFICATIONS
Jon Browning, PG, CEG, brings over 20 years of
experience in engineering geology and environmental
consulting. His work includes geologic feasibility
studies, site characterization, seismic site assessments, and engineering design for mining, civil, and land
development projects. Jon specializes in subsurface
geotechnical exploration for fault trench and landslide investigations, geologic field mapping, managing large
field projects, directing subcontractors, consulting
with clients, and preparing technical reports. Jon has
extensive experience in subsurface geotechnical and
mineral exploration using various drilling techniques,
including hollow stem auger, solid stem auger, mud/
air rotary, direct push, reverse circulation, sonic,
dual rotary, and cone penetrometer testing. His
environmental geology expertise covers remedial
investigation/ feasibility studies (RI/FS), hydrogeology characterization, remediation system installation,
aquifer pump testing, and soil/ groundwater
investigations, including well installation. As a Certified Engineering Geologist, Jon leverages his knowledge
of geological principles and engineering techniques
to assess and mitigate geological hazards, provide
geological interpretations, and offer recommendations
to support engineering projects.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Shoemaker Bridge Replacement, Long Beach, CA
The Shoemaker Bridge is an extension of Shoreline Drive in Long Beach that traverses the Los Angeles River. The scope of work included drilling several deep borings and cone penetration tests (CPT), up to 200 feet deep, in the river using an amphibious carrier with a drill rig and CPT device. Samples and information from the borings and CPTs were used to develop deep foundation recommendations for support of abutments and the bridge span over the river. As a Certified Engineering Geologist, Jon observed subsurface drilling and helped draft the report on geologic hazard sections.

SAnDAG, South Bay Bus Transit, Chula Vista, CA
T his $16.9 million project consisted of the construction of a six- mile, dedicated bus rapid transit guideway along East Palomar Street in the City of Chula Vista. Twining provided quality control material testing and inspection of asphalt and soils. Jon served as an Assistant Project Manager by providing oversight of inspector soils compaction daily field reports, during the replacement of project underground utility lines.

View Crest Road Geotechnical, Glendale, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 39
Liangcai He

PHD, PE, GE
Chief Geotechnical Engineer

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Hydraulic and
Hydropower Engineering, Tsinghua
University, China
Masters of Civil and Structural
Engineering, Emphasis in
Geotechnical Engineering, nan yang
Technological University, Singapore
PhD, Structural Engineering,
Emphasis in Geotechnical
Engineering, University of California,
San Diego

CERTIFICATION
PE, CA #73280 | GE, CA #3033

AWARDS & AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
33 QUALIFICATIONS
Dr. Liangcai He, PE, GE, brings over 33 years of
experience to Twining. Liangcai has extensive
experience in earthquake engineering, soil-structure
interaction, field investigations, earthwork and
foundation design, retaining walls, seepage and
groundwater modeling, embankment dams and levees,
slope stability, and preparation of technical reports.

His responsibilities have included project planning
and management, proposals, cost estimates, field
investigation, laboratory testing, engineering analyses, report preparation, plan review, and construction
monitoring. Liangcai has performed numerous analyses
and modeling for ground motion, site seismic response,
liquefaction, lateral spreading, static and dynamic
soil-structure interaction, system identification and
optimization, slope stability and deformation, bearing
capacity, elastic and consolidation settlement,
lateral earth pressure, and soil springs. As Chief
Geotechnical Engineer, Liangcai will lead geotechnical
investigations, analyses, and design efforts, ensuring
the integrity and safety of structures by assessing soil conditions, providing expert recommendations, and
overseeing quality assurance protocols.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
United States Army Corps of Engineers, P-159
Operations Access Points, Camp Pendleton
This 2018 joint United States Army Corps of Engineers, Caltrans, and North County Transit District project at Camp Pendleton, consisted of the widening and remediation of an existing roadway that provides access to Red Beach. An existing
railroad bridge was demolished and replaced with a two-span steel girder bridge. The project also added new retaining walls, associated site work, drainage, and shoring. Twining’s scope of services on this federally funded project includes providing geotechnical soils testing and quality assurance services.

Liangcai served as the Chief Geotechnical Engineer.

Al15GT22 Sewer Group 843, San Diego, CA
T he project consisted of the installation of new sewer mains in San Diego’s Logan Heights neighborhood. Twining is
performing the geotechnical investigation of the proposed construction area to obtain information regarding the existing subsurface condition and to evaluate the feasibility of trenchless installation method and other alternative construction methods.

Liangcai served as the Chief Geotechnical Engineer.

On-Call Professional Pavement Engineering, Simi
Valley, CA

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
F. T E AM R E SUMES 40
Hossein Bahmyari

PHD FELLOW, DGE, PE
Project Executive, Senior
Geotechnical Engineer

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Islamic Azad
University, Tehran, Iran
Masters of Geotechnical &
Foundation Engineering, Islamic
Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Masters of Civil Engineering &
Materials Engineering, University of
nebr aska
PhD Fellow, Geotechnical
Engineering, University of nebr aska

CERTIFICATION
Diplomat Geotechnical Engineering
(DGE) | PE, CA #96426

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
20 QUALIFICATIONS
Hossein Bahmyari brings over 20 years of extensive
experience in geotechnical engineering design,
analysis, and investigation to Twining. With a diverse
portfolio of projects, including high-rise structures,
underground facilities, and critical infrastructure such as tunnels, highways, dams, and levees, Hossein has
worked with a wide range of clients, including private
companies and esteemed government entities like
State Departments of Transportation, the Army Corps
of Engineers, nAVFAC, State and national W ater
Authorities, and the Federal Highway Administration.

Hossein possesses a comprehensive skill set in the
field. His areas of expertise encompass a wide array
of geotechnical solutions, including retaining walls,
shoring and support systems, cofferdam design, earth
retaining structures, soil nails, anchor bolts, slope
analysis and stability, evaluation of underground
utility protection, working surface design, settlement
analysis, dewatering, pile drivability analysis, as well as the design of shallow and deep foundations such
as driven piles and drilled shafts. Throughout his
career, spanning nearly two decades, he has effectively served as a project manager and technical supervisor,
successfully overseeing, and guiding numerous
geotechnical projects. As Senior Geotechnical Engineer, Hossein will assist in conducting geotechnical analyses, providing technical expertise, and ensuring compliance
with project specifications and standards, contributing to the successful execution of the project.

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Department of Transportation, Carson City, nV
The State of Nevada Department of Transportation embarked on a project aimed at improving Interstate 15. Hossein played a crucial role in a specific section of the project, located near Tropicana Avenue in the city of Nevada. Hossein’s
responsibilities included designing soil nail walls for the demolition of existing bridges and the construction of new bridges and MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) walls.

Desalination Plant Project, Calsbad, CA
T he Desalination Plant project in Carlsbad, California involved the construction of a new facility for desalinating water.

Hossein played a crucial role as a geotechnical design engineer, focusing on various aspects of the project. One of Hossein’s responsibilities was the design and recommendations for all deep foundations, particularly the trestle piles that would support heavy equipment during construction.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

POMONA WATER RESOURCES HEADQUARTERS & YARD
G. CONSULTANT RATE SCHEDULE

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESG. C O n S ULTA n T R A TE S CH EDULE 41 All proposed hourly rates are fully burdened and include overhead, profit, taxes, and benefits. The hours identified for each individual employee and task are estimates only and are not to be construed as not to exceed hours for any individual task, phase, or time period. We reserve the right to reallocate hours between staff members and tasks, in consultation with City staff, in order to accomplish the overall objectives and requirements of the project.

POSITION A S S O C I A T E D
FIRM 2025 A N T I C I P A T E D
2026 CHANGES
Project Manager $290 N/A
Program Analyst
$250 N/A
Cost Estimator
$235 N/A
Project Architect $280 N/A
Design Team $230 N/A
Civil Project Engineer $265 N/A
Civil Engineer Team $230 N/A
Utility Project Engineer $260 N/A
Utility Engineer Team $230 N/A
CEQA Specialists: Principal Planner $350 N/A
CEQA Specialists: Environmental
Planner
$235 N/A
Grants Funds Specialist: Grants
Director
$300 N/A
Grant Funds Specialist: Grants Team $250 N/A
Registered Geo Engineer $250 N/A
Sr. Engineer / Geologist $225 N/A
Team Geologist $200 N/A
Drilling Specialists $160 N/A
Consultant Rate Schedule
2025-2026

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

WESTMINSTER CORPORATE YARD
H. APPENDIX

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFI n STRUCTURESH. A P PE n D I x 42
Exceptions
We have reviewed the City of Folsom's Sample Contract - Consultant and Professional Services Agreement and Exhibits, and have included the proposed exceptions and deviations below.

ATTACHMENT A: SAMPLE CONTRACT - CONSULTANT AND

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
• III. Schedule for Performance. Insert at end of first sentence:  “subject to extensions for causes beyond Consultant’s reasonable control.”
• XI. Ownership of Work Product. Insert after first sentence: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, any intellectual property owned, created, made, conceived, reduced to practice, or developed prior to, or independent of, any services performed under this Agreement (“Prior Intellectual Property”) will remain the property of Consultant. Upon execution of this Agreement, Consultant hereby grants to City a non-exclusive, perpetual, fully-paid, assignable license In Consultant’s Prior Intellectual Property used on this Project as reasonable required to make use of the work product for the sole purpose of completing the design, construction, remodeling of the Project, provided that the City substantially performs its obligations, including prompt payment of all undisputed sums when due under this Agreement. This assignable license in Consultant’s Prior Intellectual Property not used on this Project.
• XII. Indemnification. Remove from the first sentence “immediately” and “agents, and volunteers” • XII. Indemnification. In the first sentence: replace “or damages that” with “or damages to the extent that they”
• XII. Indemnification. In the third sentence: replace “liability was caused by” with “liability was not caused by” and replace “of an indemnified party” with “of Consultant”. • XII. Indemnification. In the second paragraph: remove paragraph starting with “The duty to defend” and ending with “comparative liability of the indemnified party”. • V. Invoicing. At the end of Section V: add “Consultant reserves the right to add 1 1/2 % per month (18% per year) service charge on any non-disputed unpaid balances over 60 days outstanding.

EXHIBIT B - INSURANCE
• A.1.g. General Liability. Respectfully request to delete g.: “If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.” • A.5. Professional Liability Insurance. Replace “occurrence” with “occurrence with claim. • A.6.a.ii. Other Insurance Provisions. Respectfully request to delete “agents and volunteers”. • A.6.a.iii. Other Insurance Provisions. Respectfully request to delete “agents and volunteers”. • A.5.b. Other Insurance Provisions. Respectfully request to delete “agents and volunteers” from lines 3-4 and 5 of the paragraph.
• A.5.c. Other Insurance Provisions. Respectfully request to delete “agents and volunteers”. • A.5.d. Other Insurance Provisions. Respectfully request to delete “agents and volunteers”. • A.5.e. Other Insurance Provisions. Remove the following from paragraph e.: “suspended, voided”, “by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits”, “or materially changed”, “certified”.

06/09/2026 Item No.17.
n O RTHER n CALIFOR n I A OFFICE
1850 WARBURTO n AVE n UE
SUITE 120
SA n T A CLARA, CA 95050
408 955 0431
SOUTHER n CALIFOR n I A OFFICE
1 TECH n O LOGY DRIVE
BUILDI n G I SUITE 829
IRVI n E , CA 92618
949 497 9000

WALNUT CREEK CORPORATE YARD

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

MORGAN HILL CORPORATE YARD

SAN MATEO JOINT

USE CORPORATE YARD

TUSTIN CORPORATE YARD, WATER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
& EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER

HAYWARD CORPORATE
YARD

TIBURON CORPORATE YARD

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 5
Griffin Structures, Inc. – Fee Proposal

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

F EE P ROPOSAL A

FEE PROPOSAL
Consulting Services for the City of Folsom Corporation Yard Site Planning and Environmental Assessment
OCTOBER 23, 2025
Ryan Chance, Engineering Manager
City of Folsom - Public Works
50 natoma Street
Folsom, California 95630

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES

FEE PROPOSALB
Fee Proposal
Project
Manager
Program
Analyst
Program
Analyst
Program
Analyst
Cost
Estimator
Project
Architect
LPA Design
Team
Project
Engineer
Engineer
Team
Project
Engineer
Engineer
Team
Principal
Planner
Environ.

Planner
Grants
Director
Grants
Team
PhaseDESCRIPTION
Dustin
Alamo
Krista
Beatie
Hailey
Muller
Ariana
Ramzian
Ryan
Craven
Jeremy
HartBlended RateWalter
StembergaBlended RateRobert
Newman
Blended
Rate
Christine
Kronenberg
Angelica
Chiu
Alex
Gibbs
Blended
Rate
$290$250$250$250$235$280$230$260$230$265$230$350$235$300$250 1BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION$16,330
Kickoff Meeting 4–2––2–––––2–2–
Prepare Data Request2–4––––––––––––
Review / Analzye Information84164–2–2–2–2–2–
2STAFF AND SPACE PROJECTIONS VALIDATION & ALIGNMENT$86,180 Survey and Inventory of Space84244–––––––––––
Validation Workshops8–8––––––––––––
Staff Projection Alignment840168–––––––––––
Space Projection Validation8208040–––––––––––
Parking Projections2–820–––––––––––
Presentation / Revisions84164–––––––––––
3UTILITY IDENTIFICATION AND COORDINATION$27,880
Research / Analyze Utilities w/ Providers2––––––420–––––– Draft Utility Plan2––––––824––––––
Utility Coordination Report4––––––1240––––––
4SITE SURVEY $47,080
Record Boundary Survey8––––––––1640––––
Topographic Survey8––––––––4080––––
5CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES AND COSTING$89,800
Adjacency Diagrams / Test Fit Site Layouts84164–168048–––––– Phasing Considerations82164–816––––––––
Conceptual Statement of Probable Cost16–4–808–––4–––––
Comparative Evaluation Matrix84164–816––––––––
6PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN$30,900
Preferred Preliminary Site Plan Refinement 8–4––204024–––––– Updated Project Phasing / Costs16–8–20––––––––––
7ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION$22,220
EIR Addendum - Administrative Draft8––––––––––1620––
Screencheck Draft2––––––––––412––
EIR Addendum - Final Draft2––––––––––412––
Technical Reports (TBD in negotiations / discussions with the City)––––––––––––––– –
8GRANT FUNDING SUPPORT$10,760
Orientation Meeting2––––––––––––48
Strategic Funding Plan2––––––––––––816
Idenfify, Research, and Monitor Funding Opportunities––––––––––––––– Subtotal Hours160822389210064152329662120284416241310
Subtotal Cost$46,400$20,500$59,500$23,000$23,500$17,920$34,960$8,320$22,080$16,430$27,600$9,800$10,340$4,800$6,000$331,150 Reimbursables (insurance, reprographics, etc.)$3,850
GRAND TOTAL$335,000

ADDITIVE ALTERNATES
1BASELINE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION50,000
2ENHANCED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (ADD-ON TO ADDITIVE ALTERNATE #1)55,000 3DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN - CORPORATE YARD SITE (ONLY)60,000 TOTAL
CEQA Specialist

TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Project Manager / Needs Assessment / Cost EstimatorArchitectUtility SpecialistCivil EngineerGrant Funds Specialist

GRIFFIN STRUCTURESLPA DESIGN STUDIOSBKF ENGINEERSMNS ENGINEERSDUDEK

06/09/2026 Item No.17.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

5/26/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11630 - A Resolution Adopting a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the Cit y Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11630 - A Resolution Adopting a List of Project s for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

On April 28, 2017, California Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), which establishes the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) to address deferred maintenance on the state highway and local street and road systems. The Bill states that funds shall be used for projects that include, but are not limited to, the following:

 Roadway drainage, maintenance, and rehabilitation
 Safety projects
 Railroad grade separations
 Complete street components, including active transp ortation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and stormwater capture projects  Traffic control devices
 Match for state/federal funds for eligible projects
 Purchase of equipment needed for eligible roadway and infrastructure maintenance

06/09/2026 Item No.18.
2 The City of Folsom is estimated to receive approxim ately $2.6 million of RMRA funds for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

The Fiscal Year 2026-27 Senate Bill 1 (SB-1) funds will be allocated to support the following infrastructure projects aimed at enhancing transpor tation and pedestrian safety, roadway maintenance, and overall operational efficiency.

Project Title: Greenback Lane Culvert and Paving Project FY26-27 SB-1 Funding: $500,000
Schedule: FY 2026-27
Useful Life: 50 years
Description: This project proposes to replace an existing culve rt that conveys Hinkle Creek below Greenback Lane, just west of the intersection of Greenback and Folsom Blvd. The culvert has reached the end of its useful service l ife, and replacement in the next few years is necessary.

Location: On Greenback Lane, approximately 250’ west of the G reenback Lane / Folsom Auburn Road intersection.

Project Title: Bridge Preventative Maintenance
FY26-27 SB-1 Funding: $1,030,000
Schedule: FY 2026-27
Useful Life: 50 years
Description: This project provides bridge maintenance of various local bridges throughout Folsom based on annual Caltrans bridge inspection r eports. Construction improvements may be implemented as individual projects based on need.

Locations: This project is currently in the scoping and budget ing phase. Final bridge list for FY 26/27 can be provided at the request of City Council.

Project Title: Central Business District (CBD) Storm Drain Realignment Phase 1 FY26-27 SB-1 Funding: $257,076
Schedule: FY 2026-27
Useful Life: 50 years
Description: An existing public storm drain, located at 511 East Bidwell Street, crosses private property without the proper easements and is in need of replacement. In collaboration with the property owners, this project will realign this seg ment of storm drain away from the existing structure and within a new easement to the south.

Location: This project is located on East Bidwell Street, aff ronting and adjacent to 511 East Bidwell Street.

06/09/2026 Item No.18.
3 POLICY / RULE

To receive SB-1 funds, local agencies are required by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to annually submit a list of proje cts that may be constructed and funded with RMRA funds, and the list must be part of an ap proved Resolution. The list of projects allows the City to scope the Capital Improvements to meet the available funding.

ANALYSIS

Staff has reviewed the most recent SB-1 reporting and spending requirements and found them to be reasonable and realistic to achieve.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

There is no direct financial impact in adopting the list of projects to submit to the California Transportation Commission that may be constructed and funded with Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Act funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11630 - A Resolution Adopting a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2026- 27 to be Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act

2. Map of FY 2026-27 Proposed SB 1 Funded Projects

Submitted,

Rebecca Neves, Public Works Director/City Engineer

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

Attachment 1

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

Resolution No. 11630

RESOLUTION NO. 11630

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 TO BE FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

WHEREAS , Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Account ability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), was passed by the Le gislature and signed into law by California Governor Brown in April 2017 to address the signifi cant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and

WHEREAS , SB 1 includes accountability and transparency pro visions that will ensure that Folsom residents are aware of the projects proposed for funding in their community, and which projects have been completed each Fiscal Year; and

WHEREAS , the City must pass a resolution adopting a list o f eligible projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Re habilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the loca tion of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and

WHEREAS , the list of projects will include projects that m ay not be completed in the fiscal year allotted due to available funding; and

WHEREAS , the City projects to receive an estimated $2.6 million in RMRA funding from SB 1 in Fiscal Year 2026-27; and

WHEREAS , this is the tenth year in which the City is recei ving SB 1 funding that will enable the City to continue essential infrastructur e and storm drain improvement projects that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and

WHEREAS , the SB 1 project list and overall investment in F olsom’s local streets and roads infrastructure - with a focus on basic mainte nance and safety, investing in the complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting edge tech nology, materials, and practices — will have significant positive co-benefits citywide; and

WHEREAS , the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom approves this Resolution adopting the list of projects below to be funded in FY 2026-27 by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

Resolution No. 11630

Project
Project
Description

Project Location
Estimated
Project
Schedule
Estimated
Useful Life
Greenback Lane
Culvert and Paving
Project

Design and
replacement of
existing culvert
On Greenback Lane,
approximately 250’ west
of the Greenback Lane /
Folsom Auburn Road
intersection
Begin July 2026
End June 2027
50 year life

Bridge Preventative
Maintenance (design
and local match)
Bridge
Maintenance as
identified by
Caltrans bridge
inspection
reports
Various locations
including Lake Natoma
Crossing and Folsom
Lake Crossing
Begin July 2026
End June 2027
50 year life
Central Business
District Storm Drain
Realignment Phase 1

Relocation of
existing public
storm drain
On East Bidwell Street,
affronting and adjacent to
511 East Bidwell Street
Begin July 2026
End June 2027
50 year life

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26
th day of May 2026 by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

Attachment 2

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

06/09/2026 Item No.18.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

5/26/2026
AGENDA SECTION:

New Business
SUBJECT: Presentation of the City Manager’s FY 2026-27 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Public Financing Authority

FROM: Finance Department

The City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 proposed budget will be presented. This budget will encompass the 12-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 and will also include the Capital Improvement Plan.

For Fiscal Year 2026-27, revenues in the General Fund are estimated at $118,311,724, plus transfers-in of $6,042,136, for total estimated revenues of $124,353,860. Proposed expenditures are $123,421,517, with transfers out of $880,468, for total expenditures of $124,301,985. Proposed expenditures are slightly below estimated revenues in an effort to ensure that General Fund expenditures at the end of the fiscal year are within the total revenues available.

The May 26, 2026, presentation of the proposed budget is the first step in the budget adoption process. The City Council will hold a public hearing on June 9, 2026, receive public input and have their first opportunity to adopt the FY 2026-27 Budget. If needed, the public hearing can be continued to the June 23, 2026, City Council meeting. Per the City’s municipal code, the budget must be adopted by the last working day of the fiscal year (June 30)

Submitted,

06/09/2026 Item No.19.
2 Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director/CFO

06/09/2026 Item No.19.