1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
June 09, 2026, 6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.
Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table. Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins. When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium. Speakers generally have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.
Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:
In Person Online On TV
City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14
More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda
2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, June 09, 2026 6:30 PM
Justin Raithel, Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Barbara Leary, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Leary, Rohrbough, Aquino, Kozlowski, Raithel The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item w ill be continued to a future Council meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are generally limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.
Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
1. Approval of the May 12, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
2. Ordinance No. 1370 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying Special Taxes for the Fiscal Year 2026- 27 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 24 (Alder Creek West) (Second Reading and Adoption)
3 3. Resolution No. 11636 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non-Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program, Utilizing the $200,000 Allocation from the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201)
4. Resolution No. 11637 – A Resolution Authorizing Public Fireworks Displays During the Annual Folsom Pro Rodeo
5. Resolution No. 11638 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for Construction Management Services in the Amount of $521,438.77 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to be reimbursed from a Federal Grant for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No. PW2305
6. Resolution No. 11640 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and Appropriation of Funds
7. Resolution No. 11641 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a One-Year Extension to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-046) with Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC for an Estimated Cost of $288,000 from the Solid Waste Operating Fund (Fund 540) for Processing and Diversion of Commercial Recyclables NEW BUSINESS:
8. Resolution No. 11644 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $2,856,988.45, with $1,000,000 from the SB-1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Fund (Fund 235) and $1,856,988.45 from the Measure A Fund (Fund 276), for the Pavement Resurfacing Project FY 25-26, Project No. 8017, and Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $1,382,045.11 in the Measure A Fund (Fund 276)
PUBLIC HEARING:
9. Resolution No.11646 – A Resolution to Amend Resolution No. 11094 and Adopt an Amended Fee Schedule for the Ambulance Cost Recovery Program Provided by the Fire Department
10. Toll Brothers at Alder Creek - south of Alder Creek Parkway, east and west of Oak Avenue Parkway, north of Mangini Parkway, and east of Prairie City Road, in the Folsom Plan Area (MSTR25-00084)- Resolution No 11643 - A Resolution of the City Council Determining that the Toll Brothers at Alder Creek Project is Exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 and Approving a Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Planned Development Permit, Inclusionary Housing Plan, and Minor Administrative Modification (To be continued to June 23, 2026)
11. Resolution No. 11642 – A Resolution Adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan and Authorizing the City Manager to Submit the Plans to the California Department of Water Resources and to the California State Library
12. Resolution No. 11645 – A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Public Financing Authority
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
4 COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.
NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the abov e decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.
As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.
PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
This meeting of the City Council is recorded with closed captioning. The recording will be cablecast on Metro Cable Channel 14, the local government affairs channel on the Comcast and DirecTV U -Verse cable system, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The recording will also be video streamed at metro14live.saccounty.gov.The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1
City Council Special Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm with Mayor Raithel presiding.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Present:
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
Justin Raithel, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8:
Real Property Located along Leidesdorff Street (APN 070-0046-026 and 070-0042-002).
Negotiating Parties: City Manager Bryan Whitemyer and Community Development Director Pam Johns on behalf of the City of Folsom; Brian Martell and Moe Hirani on behalf of the property owners. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Sale
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Leary to adjourn to closed session. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Rohrbough, Leary, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
RECONVENE
Interim City Attorney Sari Dierking announced that no final action was taken during closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:37 pm.
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2
SUBMITTED BY:
_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
______________________________
Justin Raithel, Mayor
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1
City Council Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:37 pm with Mayor Raithel presiding.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Vice Mayor
Justin Raithel, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was recited.
AGENDA UPDATE
Interim City Attorney Sari Dierking advised that there was additional information for Item no. 10.
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
None
SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming May 17-23, 2026 as National Public Works Week, May 20, 2026 as City Works Day, and Recognizing Public Works as Emergency Responders
Mayor Raithel presented the Proclamation. Public Works Director Rebecca Neves provided a brief presentation.
2. Annual Presentation by the Sacramento- Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District regarding Regional Mosquito and Vector Management Efforts
Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District Assistant Manager Steve Ramos provided a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. Folsom ’s representative to the District,
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2
Craig Burnett , also spoke briefly . Mayor Raithel thanked Mr. Burnett for serving as the City’s representative to the board.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.
Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
3. Resolution No. 11595 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Engineering Consultant Services Agreement with R.E.Y. Engineers Inc. in the Amount of $346,986 for the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail Project, Project No. PK1604, from State Active Transportation Program Grant Funds in the Amount of $200,000 and Transportation Demand Act (Fund 248) in the Amount of $146,986, and Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $176,986 from Fund 248
4. Resolution No. 11606 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 23-009) with Domenichelli & Associates, Inc. for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Water System Rehabilitation Project No. 3 (Project WA2301) for $14,387 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $14,721 from the Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Fund (Fund 235) [Water Treatment Plant, Faucet Court, Deerwood Way, Folsom-Auburn Road, Oak Avenue Parkway, Price Way, Wales Drive, School Street, Pine Brook Drive, Overbrook Drive, Southwood Drive, Southcreek Circle]
5. Resolution No. 11607 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 25-016) with HF&H Consultants, LLC for $36,500 for the Water and Wastewater Rate Studies with $25,000 from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $11,500 from the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530)
6. Resolution No. 11610 - A Resolution Receiving Report from the Community Development Department on the Approval of a Parcel Map Waiver for the Emblem Empire Ranch Apartments Project and Determination that No Further CEQA Review is Required
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Leary to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
OLD BUSINESS
7. Resolution No. 11609 – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-2 Ballot Proceeding, Approving the Final Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Diagram and Assessments, and Ordering the Levying of Assessments for the Maintenance and Servicing of Improvements Within Said District
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 3
Municipal Landscape Services Manager Derik Perez provided a presentation.
Motion by Councilmember Leary, second by Councilmember Rohrbough to approve Resolution No. 11609. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
NEW BUSINESS:
8. Resolution No. 11608 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Michael Roberts Construction, Inc. for the Replacement of the Folsom Public Library Low- Slope Roof for a Cost Not To Exceed $948,044.71 (Fund 602)
Capital Projects Manager Ryan Neves provided a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Rohrbough to approve Resolution No. 11608. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
9. Resolution No. 11611 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Loewen Pump Maintenance for the Replacement of (1) Motor and Pump and Refurbishment of (1) Pump for the 50-meter Swimming Pool at the Steve Miklos Aquatics Center for a Cost Not-to-Exceed $88,392.70 (Fund 602)
Recreation and Community Services Manager Tom Hellmann provided a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 11611. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
PUBLIC HEARING:
10. Resolution No. 11613 - A Resolution Receiving the 2026 Ad Hoc Charter Review Committee Report to City Council with Recommended Amendments and Dissolving the Committee and
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 4
Direction to Staff Regarding Preparation of Potential Ballot Measure(s) Amending the City Charter and/or the Folsom Municipal Code for the 2026 General Municipal Election
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided a presentation. Ad Hoc Charter Review Committee Chair Bill Romanelli shared additional information. Interim City Attorney Sari Dierking responded to City Council questions regarding campaign contribution limits and the city attorney’s role in relation to the City Council. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer described the next approval steps for potential charter measures at future City Council meetings and responded to questions from the City Council.
Mayor Raithel opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m.
The following speakers spoke under this item:
• Macy Sherman
• Teresa Garcia
• Brad Shelton
• Jag Nagendra
• Julie Rees
• Adam Murphy
• Shelley Hudson
• Gwynne Willison
• Colleen Shannon
• Chad Vander Veen
• Jolene Livingston
• Julian Sarafian
• Josilyn Schrage
• Paul Kerfeld
The public hearing was closed at 8:19 p.m.
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer, Interim City Attorney Sari Dierking, and Utilities Director Marcus Yasutake responded to questions from the City Council. City Clerk Christa Freemantle provided additional information in response to City Council questions regarding Sacramento County’s fees for placing measure(s) on the ballot
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Rohrbough to approve Resolution No. 11613. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional comments
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 5
Motion by Councilmember Rohrbough, second by Councilmember Aquino to remove from further consideration for placement on the ballot:
• Term Limits (Report Item 2 - Charter section 2.01(E); and • City Council Compensation and Expenses (Report Item 3 - Charter section 2.06)
Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Rohrbough to remove from further consideration for placement on the ballot:
• City Council – reference to at-large elections (Report Item 1 - Charter section 2.01); and • Transition of Elected Officials from 1990 (Report Item 7 - Charter section 9.02)
Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
Motion by Councilmember Aquino, second by Councilmember Leary to remove from further consideration for placement on the ballot:
• Restriction on City Utility or Enterprise (franchise authority) (Report Item 4 – Charter section 2.07(D)
Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Aquino, Leary, Rohrbough, Raithel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None
In closing the City Council noted that the following items will be brought back to the May 26 City Council meeting for further consideration for the ballot:
Report Item 5 – City Attorney (method of appointment)
Report Item 6 – Boards and Commissions (striking language designating all as only advisory to the Council)
Report Item 8 – Campaign Contribution Limits (increasing the maximum contribution limit)
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
File 034-21 26-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
May 12, 2026
Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 6
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer gave a Castle Park update and thanked those involved in the City of Folsom’s 80th birthday party. He also spoke about the upcoming grand reopening of the Folsom bike park event, City Works Day, Battle of the Badges blood drive, and Fire Station 36 as a temporary location while repairs are completed at Fire Station 39.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Aquino expressed gratitude to everyone who contributed to the success of the City of Folsom’s 80th birthday celebration.
Councilmember Leary shared updates regarding her recent attendance and participation at the Guruvandana celebration, the Folsom Cordova Unified School District joint meeting, a site visit to the Sacramento Food Bank facility, the Tree Foundation fundraiser, and ongoing efforts surrounding the Water Forum Agreement.
Vice Mayor Rohrbough commented on the success of the 80th birthday celebration and extended formal recognition and thanks to the Parks and Recreation Department staff for their extensive hard work on the Castle Park build project.
Mayor Raithel echoed thanks to all volunteers and staff involved in the Castle Park build and the City of Folsom’s 80th birthday celebration. He highlighted his recent attendance at the Folsom Fire Department promotion ceremony, offering congratulations to the promoted personnel for their continued service. Mayor Raithel commended Councilmember Leary and Utilities Director Marcus Yasutake for their dedicated work on the Water Forum Agreement, and extended congratulations to Sutter Health on its new healthcare partnership with the Sacramento Kings. He concluded his remarks by reminding the public to vote for the "Ideas for Change" initiative and offering a special thank you to his mother for attending the evening's meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m.
SUBMITTED BY:
_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
______________________________
Justin Raithel, Mayor
06/09/2026 Item No.1.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE:
6/9/2026
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1370 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying Special Taxes for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to the City of Folsom
Community Facilities District No. 24 (Alder Creek West) (Second Reading and Adoption)
FROM: Finance Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the second reading and move to adopt the following ordinance:
Ordinance No. 1370 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying Special Taxes for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 24 (Alder Creek West) (Second Reading and Adoption)
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Public Facilitie s Financing Plan (“PFFP”), approved by the City Council on January 28, 2014 via Resolution 9298, is an $877 million plan that describes the backbone infrastructure and facility requirements, presents a comprehensive financing strategy, and sets forth the estimated time horizon for the development of the Folsom Plan Area (“FPA”).
Landowners within the FPA requested to form the pro posed City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 24 (Alder Creek West) (“CFD No. 24”), including four separate Improvement Areas (“IA”), designated as Improvement Area No. 1, No. 2A, No. 2B and No.
3. A boundary map showing the proposed CFD 24 and the four separate improvement areas is below
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
2 Special tax revenues generated from each IA within CFD No. 24 will help fund all or a portion of the project’s share of PFFP backbone infrastruct ure and facilities. A detailed list of authorized facilities can be found under Exhibit A of Resolution No. 11581. A summary of the facilities authorized to be funded by CFD No. 24 include, but are not limited to:
Transportation Improvements including all public ro adway improvement designed to meet the needs of development within CFD No. 24, in cluding internal subdivision streets and related underground utilities.
Water System Improvements
Recycled Water System Improvements
Drainage System Improvements
Wastewater System Improvements
Park, Parkway and Open Space Improvements
Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee Infrastructure
Other Incidental Expenses and Bond Issuance Costs
In addition, the following project-specific services are anticipated to be funded by CFD No. 24 special taxes:
Open space maintenance
Landscape corridors and paseos
Street light maintenance
Medians, entries and entry monumentation
Neighborhood park maintenance, repair and replacement Community amenities
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
3 Storm water management
Other miscellaneous costs related to any of the items described above Anticipated future repairs or replacements costs.
Public Services for Police, Fire and other emergency services
The proposed CFD No. 24 is located within the FPA a nd is generally bounded by U.S.
Highway 50 on the north, Prairie City Road on the w est, and White Rock Road on the south.
Each IA within CFD No. 24 includes several Assessor’s Parcel Numbers, which are identified in the proposed boundary map for CFD No. 24, includ ed as Attachment 4. The proposed development plan for each IA within CFD No. 24 includes the following:
The CFD No. 24 funding stream will be a combination of bonded indebtedness and pay-as- you-go (“PAYGO”) funding, both secured by the levy of special taxes upon property within the boundaries of CFD No. 24.
On April 14, 2026, this City Council approved a pro posed boundary map and declared the intention to form CFD No. 24 and to levy special ta xes within CFD No. 24 by passage of Resolution No. 11581. On that same date, this City Council declared the necessity for incurring bonded indebtedness in and for CFD No. 24 and in an d for each IA designated therein by passage of Resolution No. 11582.
A Public Hearing and landowner election were conducted on May 26, 2026. At that time, the following resolutions were approved by the Council:
Resolution No. 11625, the Resolution of Formation, which formed CFD No. 24, designated four separate IA’s, designated a future annexation area and authorized the levying of taxes therein
Resolution No. 11626, which deemed it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within the four respective IA’s within CFD No. 24
Resolution No. 11627, which called for a special ma iled-ballot election within each respective IA
Resolution No. 11628, which declared the results of the elections within each respective IA
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
4 The results of the landowner elections were as follows:
Improvement Area No. 1: 87 in favor of the ballot measure and zero opposed Improvement Area No. 2A: 42 in favor of the ballo t measure and zero opposed Improvement Area No. 2B: 86 in favor of the ballo t measure and zero opposed Improvement Area No. 3: 235 in favor of the ballo t measure and zero opposed
POLICY / RULE
Chapter 5 of the Folsom Plan Area Public Facilities Financing Plan authorizes the formation of CFDs to finance the construction, acquisition, and servicing of FPA backbone infrastructure and public facilities
Section 2.5.3 of the First Amended and Restated Tie r 1 Development Agreement authorizes the formation of infrastructure CFDs.
Resolution No. 9282 – A Resolution of the City Coun cil of the City of Folsom Approving Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
ANALYSIS
CFD No. 24 will be structured as an extended-term CFD and will provide the necessary funding to help fund all or a portion of the project’s shar e of PFFP backbone infrastructure and facilities, including related environmental mitigat ion obligations. The PFFP backbone infrastructure and facilities will be financed using both bond proceeds and PAYGO special tax revenues. The extended-term CFD structure is proposed to help to meet the challenge of high- cost infrastructure and facilities while also align ing the timing of future funding availability with the need for such funding.
The PFFP backbone facilities to be funded via CFD N o. 24, and listed above, were originally anticipated to be funded by either Community Facili ties District No. 18 (Folsom Plan Area - Area-Wide Improvements and Services) or funded as part of project specific CFDs established for each development within the FPA.
The special tax revenue generated from taxable parcels within each IA of CFD No. 24 will be comprised of a special tax to fund facilities and a special tax to fund services. The 2026/27 maximum facilities special tax rates, set forth in each IA’s Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), for each land use category are provided in the table below:
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
5 Land Use Category
Improvement
Area
Village
/ Lot #
2026/27
Maximum
Facilities
Special Tax
Rate Per
Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 1 5 $3,920 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 1 6 $3,505 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 1 7A $5,402 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 1 7B $4,522 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 1 7B $5,719 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2A 1A $2,547 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2A 1B $2,598 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2A 1C $2,498 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 2B 2A $2,947 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 2B 2B $2,563 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2B 3A $2,573 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 2B 3B $5,025 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 2B 4A $3,848 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 2B 4B $5,042 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8A $4,237 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8A $4,083 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8B $5,013 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8C $5,563 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 9A $5,086 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 9B $4,279 Lot Permit Ready Multi-Family/Non-Residential
Property IA 1, IA 2B, IA3 $20,000 Acre
Large Lot Property IA 1, IA 2B, IA3 $20,000 Acre
Undeveloped Property IA 1, IA 2B, IA3 $20,000 Acre Permit Ready Multi-Family/Non-Residential
Property IA 2A $23,000 Acre
Large Lot Property IA 2A $23,000 Acre
Undeveloped Property IA 2A $23,000 Acre
The CFD No. 24 facilities special tax can be levied and collected through Fiscal Year 2085/86.
Each fiscal year, commencing with 2027/28, the maxi mum facilities special tax rate will be increased by 2% annually.
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
6 The 2026/27 maximum services special tax rates, set forth in each IA’s RMA for each land use category are provided in the table below:
Land Use Category
Improvement
Area
Village
/ Lot #
2026/27
Maximum
Services
Special Tax
Rate Per
Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 1 5 $858 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 1 6 $616 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 1 7A $977 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 1 7B $659 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 1 7B $659 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2A 1A $450 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2A 1B $470 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2A 1C $400 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 2B 2A $578 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SFHD Zoning IA 2B 2B $566 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - MLD Zoning IA 2B 3A $461 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 2B 3B $857 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 2B 4A $931 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 2B 4B $840 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8A $695 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8A $695 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8B $869 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 8C $816 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 9A $796 Lot Single -Family Detached Property - SF Zoning IA 3 9B $653 Lot
The CFD No. 24 services special tax can be levied and collected until the bonds mature, or the “Transition Event”, per the RMA. Each fiscal year, commencing with 2027/28, the maximum services special tax rate will be increased by the maximum of two percent (2%) or the June annualized percentage change of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area, not to exceed four percent (4%).
After the Transition Event, both the facilities spe cial tax and services special tax levies will cease, and a transition services special tax will replace the prior funding. The transition services special tax will be an amount equal to 50% of the maximum facilities special tax rate the year prior to the Transition Event plus the maximum serv ices special tax rate the year prior to the Transition Event. Each fiscal year, commencing with the transition year, the maximum transition services special tax rate will be increa sed by the maximum of two percent (2%) or
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
7 the June annualized percentage change of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area, not to exceed four percent (4%).
As described above, CFD No. 24 will include an exte nded-term in order to provide the financing to fund CFD No. 24 authorized facilities through multiple CFD bond issues and the generation of PAYGO special tax revenue from the levy and collection of the special tax. The primary pledge of CFD No. 24 special tax revenues will be to service outstanding CFD No. 24 debt. Special tax revenues in excess of the annual debt service and administrative expenses will be used on a PAYGO basis. 100% of the PAYGO re venue beginning with CFD No. 24 formation through the 20th fiscal year is intended to be available to the landowners to fund eligible facilities. After that, any PAYGO revenue s may be used at the City’s discretion to continue to fund or acquire eligible facilities, or the City may elect to reduce the special tax levy amount to eliminate PAYGO revenues.
Ordinance No. 1370 authorizes the applicable specia l tax to be levied within each IA for FY 2026/27 and following fiscal years. The Ordinance was introduced for the first reading on May 26, 2026. No changes have been made to the ordinance since the first reading.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The services special tax for CFD No. 24 was structu red to include police, fire, and other emergency services as project-specific services.
The CFD No. 24 formation, bonded indebtedness, and expenses are solely the responsibility of CFD No. 24.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Folsom Plan Area Backbone Infrastructure Project were previously prepared for, and adopted by the City Council on February 24, 2015, in accordance with the requir ements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(c), the term “project” does not mean each separate governmental approval for an approved activity which may be subject to several discretionary approvals by governmental agencies. Additionally, the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment is not defined as a “project” under CEQA. CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) and 15061(b)(3).
ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. 1370 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying Special Taxes for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 24 (Alder Creek West) (Second Reading and Adoption)
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
8 Submitted,
Stacey Tamagni
CFO/Finance Director
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
Attachment 1
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
Ordinance No. 1370
ORDINANCE NO. 1370
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 AND FOLLOWING FISCAL YEARS
SOLELY WITHIN AND RELATING TO THE CITY OF FOLSOM
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 24
(ALDER CREEK WEST)
The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby ordains as follows:
SECTION 1 PURPOSE
The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby finds, determines and declares based on the record before it that:
1. The City is authorized to establish a community fac ilities district pursuant to the terms of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 53311 (the “Act”); and
2. On May 26, 2026, the City Council adopted its Resol ution No. 11625 (the “Resolution of Formation”) establishing the City of Folsom Communi ty Facilities District No. 24 (Alder Creek West) (the “District”) and designated four se parate improvement areas therein (the “Improvement Areas”), pursuant to the Act; and
3. In accordance with the separate Rate and Method of Apportionment for each Improvement Area, the Resolution of Formation approved the annu al levy, subject to voter approval, of a special tax in connection with each Improvement Area of the District (the “Special Tax”); and
4. The Resolution of Formation proposed the establishment of an appropriations limit for each Improvement Area of the District (the “Appropriations Limit”); and
5. On May 26, 2026, the City Clerk, as elections offic ial, conducted an election of the landowners of each Improvement Area of the District (the “Elections”); and
6. On May 26, 2026, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 11628 certifying that, at the Elections, the landowners of each Improvement Area of the District approved the Special Tax and the Appropriations Limit for each respective Improvement Area; and
7. The City Council desires to levy and impose the Spe cial Tax and to take other related actions.
SECTION 2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOL SOM RESOLVES :
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
Ordinance No. 1370
1. The recitals set forth in Section 1 are true and correct.
2. A special tax is hereby levied on all Taxable Prope rty (as defined in the respective Rate and Method of Apportionment) within each Improvemen t Area of the District, for the 2026-27 fiscal year and for all subsequent fiscal y ears in the amount of the maximum authorized tax, provided that this amount may be ad justed annually, subject to the maximum authorized special tax limit, by resolution of the City Council.
3. The Finance Director of the City of Folsom or designee thereof (the “CFD Administrator”) is authorized and directed, to determine each year, without further action of the City Council, the Special Tax, to prepare the annual Special Tax roll in the amount of the Special Tax in accordance with the related exhibit and, without further action of the City Council, to provide all necessary and appropriate informatio n to the Sacramento County Auditor- Controller’s Office (the “County”) in proper form, and in proper time, necessary to effect the correct and timely billing and collection of the Special Tax on the secured property tax roll of the County; provided, that as provided in t he Resolution of Formation and Section 53340 of the California Government Code, the City h as reserved the right to utilize any method of collecting the Special Tax which it shall , from time to time, determine to be in the best interests of the City of Folsom (the “City ”), including but not limited to, direct billing by the City to the property owners and supplemental billing.
4. The appropriate officers and agents of the City are authorized to make adjustments to the Special Tax roll prior to the final posting of the Special Tax to the County tax roll each fiscal year, as may be necessary to achieve a corre ct match of the Special Tax levy with the assessor’s parcel numbers finally utilized by t he County in sending out property tax bills.
5. The City agrees that, in the event the Special Tax is collected on the secured tax roll of the County, the County may deduct its reasonable and agreed charges for collecting the Special Tax from the amounts collected, prior to remitting the Special Tax collections to the City.
6. Taxpayers who have requested changes or corrections of the Special Tax pursuant to Section J of the respective Rate and Method of Appo rtionment and who are not satisfied with the decision of the CFD Administrator (whether the CFD Administrator disagrees with the taxpayer or concludes that the City is not authorized to consider the change requested), may appeal to the City Council. The appeal must be in writing and fully explain the grounds of appeal, and must be based solely on the correction of mistakes in the levy based upon the status of the property, and no other appeals will be allowed. The CFD Administrator shall schedule the appeal for consideration within a reasonable time at a City Council meeting.
SECTION 3 SEVERABILITY
If for any cause any portion of this ordinance is f ound to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
Ordinance No. 1370
this ordinance, and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels, shall not be affected.
SECTION 4 EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force as a tax measure thirty (30) days following its second reading and adoption at a meeting of the City Council; and before the expiration of twenty (20) days after its passage the same shall b e published, with the names of the members voting for and against the same, at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the District.
This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 26, 2026, and the second reading is to occur at the regular meeting of the City Council on June 9, 2026.
On a motion by Councilmember _________ seconded by Councilmember ___________, the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this __
th day of June 2026 by the following roll-call vote:
AYES : Councilmember(s):
NOES : Councilmember(s):
ABSENT : Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN : Councilmember(s):
Justin Raithel , MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle , CITY CLERK
06/09/2026 Item No.2.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE:
6/9/2026
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11636 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non -Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and
Redevelopment Agency Inter -Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program , Utilizing the $200,000 Allocation from the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201)
FROM: Community Development Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council m ove to adopt Resolution No. 11636 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non-Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program , Utilizing the $200,000 Allocation from the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201)
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On June 13, 202 3, the City Council approved Resolution No. 11045, authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) for continued participation in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 202 6. As part of the City’s participation in CDBG, the City Manager executed a contract with SHRA in May of 2026 to receive $200,000 in CDBG funds to subsidize the City of Folsom Seniors Helping Seni ors (SHS) Program for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
On June 10, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 11393 granting the City Manager the authority to execute agreements with five contractors - Benchmark Plumbing, F.L. Electric Service Company, Gray Construction a nd Securement Services, Inc. , Roseville Sheet Metal
06/09/2026 Item No.3.
2 Inc., and American River Companies dba Sac City Building Co. - to provide contractor services in accordance with the SHRA Seniors Helping Seniors I nter-Agency Contract. All five contracts were executed and qualified work assigned in kee ping with the City’s Seniors Helping Seniors Program.
On January 13, 2026, the City Council approved Resolution No. 11529 to add EZ Lift Accessibility Products (EZ Lift) as an additional contractor. This change was prompted by Gray Construction and Securement Services’ decision to divest a portion of their business and establish EZ Lift as a separate construction firm. EZ Lift assumed responsibility for certain services, including installation of porch wheelchair lifts for mobile home clients. Staff determined that adding EZ Lift to the City’s contractor pool would ensure continuity of these services moving forward , and following City Council’s authorization, the City Manager executed a contract with EZ Lift.
As noted previously, for Fiscal Year 2025 –26 the City Manager approved annual contracts with the six Seniors Helping Seniors contractors. These non-exclusive agreements will expire on June 30, 2026. Staff recommends authorizing the City Manager to execute new contracts with the same six contractors, effective through June 30, 2027, with a total aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $200,000, consistent with the City’s CDBG funding allocation.
POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code, City Council approval is required for professional services contracts in excess of $77,426.
ANALYSIS
The Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program provides assistance to low -income, age-qualified senior residents living in the City of Folsom. The program is designed to support seniors who do not have the financial means to complete essential health - and safety-related home repairs, and it serves both manufactured and traditional homes. Ea ch year, the city responds to more than 300 service requests through the SHS Program.
A total of six contractors have previously submitted qualification packages and currently provide services under the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program. With approval of this resolution and the associated contracts (not to exceed a combined total of $200,000 for all contracts), the following contractors will continue to support the City’s SHS Program:
1. Benchmark Plumbing
2. EZ Lift Accessibility Products
3. F.L. Electric Service Company
4. Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc.
5. Roseville Sheet Metal Inc.
6. American River Companies dba Sac City Building Co.
06/09/2026 Item No.3.
3 Each of these contractors has demonstrated expertise in the range of home repair services required for the SHS Program. They are in good standing with the City, evaluated based on performance, and recommended for renewed contracts. Moreover, all six contractors have extensive experience working with low -income senior citizens and physically disabled homeowners on small home repairs.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact to the City’s General Fund. Because the CDBG program requires expenditures to be made upfront and reimbursed afterward, the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201) is used to cover contractor and material costs. Invoi ces are submitted to SHRA monthly for reimbursement from grant proceeds. For Fiscal Year 2026 – 27, a total of $200,000 from Fund 201 has been appropriated for the SHS Program to cover materials and outside contractor expenses.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action by the City Council is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Review for Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11636 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non-Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program, Utilizing the $200,000 Allocation from the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201)
Submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
06/09/2026 Item No.3.
Resolution No. 11636
RESOLUTION NO.11636
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
NON-EXCLUSIVE AGREEMENTS WITH APPROVED LICENSED CONTRACTORS
TO IMPLEMENT THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY INTER-AGENCY CONTRACT FOR THE SENIORS HELPING SENIORS HOME REPAIR PROGRAM, UTILIZING THE $200,000 ALLOCATION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND (FUND 201)
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11045, granting the City Manager the authority to enter into an agreement with the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) for continued participation in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2026; and
WHEREAS, funds from the CDBG Program subsidize the City’s Seniors Helping Seniors (SHS) Program, which provides eligible senior citizens in the City with financial assistance to repair and remedy health and safety hazards in their homes; and
WHEREAS, SHRA has allocated $200,000 in CDBG funds to subsidize the City’s SHS Program for Fiscal Year 2026-27; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is required to enter into an Inter -Agency Contract with SHRA to receive the allocated $200,000 CDBG funds; and
WHEREAS, the CDBG funding program requires the expenditure of funds with reimbursement requested; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget includes an appropriation of $200,000 in the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201) for the SHS Program ; and
WHEREAS, contractors are selected based on their professional qualifications and experience to provide contractor services under the SHS Program; and
WHEREAS, the six contractors (Benchmark Plumbing, EZ Lift Accessibility Products, F.L. Electrical Service Company, Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc., Roseville Sheet Metal Inc ., and American River Companies dba Sac City Building Co. ) have existing contracts with the City for providing contractor services to June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, contracts of $77,426 or greater shall be approved by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute non-exclusive contracts for professional licensed contractor services with Benchmark Plumbing, EZ Lift Accessibility Products, F.L. Electric
06/09/2026 Item No.3.
Resolution No. 11636
Service Company, Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc ., Roseville Sheet Metal Inc., and American River Companies dba Sac City Building Co ., to render services under the City’s SHS Program through June 30, 20 27, not -to-exceed a combined total of $200,000 for all said contracts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June 2026, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
06/09/2026 Item No.3.
This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.
06/09/2026 Item No.3.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE:
6/9/2026
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11637 – A Resolution Authorizing Public Fireworks Displays During the Annual Folsom Pro Rodeo
FROM: Fire Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Fire Department recommends that the City Council pass and a pprove Resolution No. 11637 – A Resolution Authorizing Public Fireworks Displays During the Annual Folsom Pro Rodeo.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The annual Folsom Pro Rodeo is scheduled for July 2, July 3, and July 4, 2026, at Rodeo Park, with a proximate firework display each night.
The Fire Department is coordinating the safety requirements for these fireworks displays with the Folsom Chamber of Commerce and the California State Fire Marshal’s Office. The licensed firm Fireworks & Stage FX America has been secured by the Folsom Chamber of Commerce to operate these fireworks displays.
POLICY / RULE
Section 9.36.020 of the Folsom Municipal Code states that public displays of fireworks may only be held when authorized by resolution of the City C ouncil, after recommendation of the Fire Chief, and when under the supervision of a licensed pyrotechnic operator.
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
2 ANALYSIS
A public display of fireworks is proposed by the sponsor of the event to be fired each night at the conclusion of the rodeo. Staff have reviewed all safety issues relating to public fireworks displays and are working with the Folsom Chamber of Commerce and Fireworks & Stage FX America to mitigate any potential issues. Staff believes that these mitigation measures will reasonably satisfy the safety concerns.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as the overtime staff costs for the required fire safety officer standby each night will be paid by the Folsom Chamber of Commerce.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
There are no foreseeable environmental impacts.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 11637 – A Resolution Authorizing Public Fireworks Displays During the Annual Folsom Pro Rodeo
2. Fire Department Fire Safety Officer Service Agreement from Fireworks & Stage FX America – Folsom Pro Rodeo
Submitted,
Jason Solak, Fire Chief
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Attachment 1
Resolution No. 11637 – A Resolution Authorizing Public Fireworks Displays During the Annual Folsom Pro Rodeo
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Resolution No. 11637
RESOLUTION NO. 11637
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLIC FIREWORKS DISPLAYS
DURING THE ANNUAL FOLSOM PRO RODEO
WHEREAS, on the evenings of July 2, July 3, and July 4, 2026, the Folsom Chamber of Commerce will be sponsoring the annual Folsom Pro Rodeo at the Rodeo Park; and
WHEREAS, Folsom Municipal Code Section 9.36.020 authorizes the public display of fireworks; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom wishes to support the festivities of our nation’s independence, as well as family-oriented activities within the community,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes this public display of fireworks to celebrate this special occasion, with the recommendation of the Fire Chief, and under the supervision of licensed pyrotechnic operators.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9
th day of June 2026, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
___________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Attachment 2
Fire Department Fire Safety Officer Service Agreement from Fireworks & Stage FX America – Folsom Pro Rodeo
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Application for Permit for aPublic Display of PyrotechnicsP. O. Box 488Lakeside, CA 92040-0488(619) 938-8277Fax (619) 938-8273 Devices - 44;Bombardments - 23;
Michelle ToledoFolsom Fire Department535 Glenn DriveFolstom, CA 95630Folsom Chamber of CommerceAttn: Libby Siino200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Fireworks & Stage FX America, Inc. on behalf of the Sponsor Listed Above requests a permit toconduct a public display of fireworks in accordance with Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances.7/2/20269:45pmSite Information:Authority having Jurisdiction:Client:Date(s):PyrotechnicOperator(s)and LicenseNumber:(where required)Dan Russell Arena200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Brandon Waits 2936-02(Operator Name) (License No.)and assistants.Proof of currentGeneral Liability Insurance and Workers CompensationInsurance isattached.Adetailed diagramof the proposed firing site isattached.Ground Level Pyrotechnics (0 - 50 Foot typical Altitude):Low Level Pyrotechnics (51 - 125 foot typical altitude):Aerial Pyrotechnics (>125 foot typical altitude):
26144
PERMISSION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF PYROTECHNICS AS SPECIFIED HEREINIS HEREBY: PERMITTED DENIEDSignature of Permitting Authority DateCircle AppropriateTitle Description of Display:Time/Length:7/3/2026, 7/4/20267.5 minOffice contact:Julie Andrews(619) 938-8277, Fax (619) 938-8273BrandonCell:916-802-4482Email:[email protected] Chamber of Commerce on 7/2/2026 in Folsom, Ca.Fireworks fired Electrically, in Racks. 26144Fireworks & Stage FX Permit Reference No.Printed 5/4/
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Application for Permit for a TheatricalDisplay of PyrotechnicsP. O. Box 488Lakeside, CA 92040-0488(619) 938-8277Fax (619) 938-8273 Michelle ToledoFolsom Fire Department535 Glenn DriveFolstom, CA 95630Folsom Chamber of CommerceAttn: Libby Siino200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Fireworks & Stage FX America, Inc. on behalf of the Sponsor Listed Above requests a permit toconduct a public display of fireworks in accordance with Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances.7/2/20269:45pmSite Information:Authority having Jurisdiction:Client:Date and Time:PyrotechnicOperator(s)and LicenseNumber:(where required)Dan Russell Arena200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Brandon Waits 2936-02(Operator Name) (License No.)and assistants.Proof of currentGeneral Liability Insurance and Workers CompensationInsurance isattached.Adetailed diagramof the proposed firing site isattached. 26144PERMISSION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF PYROTECHNICS AS SPECIFIED HEREINIS HEREBY: PERMITTED DENIEDSignature of Permitting Authority DateCircle AppropriateTitleFireworks America Permit Reference No.Printed 5/4/ Description of Pyrotechnics and Special Effects:Proximate DevicesQtySizeGeneral Public Display License Number 0528:Other Dates: 7/3/2026, 7/4/2026Office contact:Julie Andrews(619) 938-8277, Fax (619) 938-827330MM Assorted Mines30MM Assorted Comets1430BrandonCell:916-802-4482Email:[email protected]
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Application for Permit for aPublic Display of PyrotechnicsP. O. Box 488Lakeside, CA 92040-0488(619) 938-8277Fax (619) 938-8273 Devices - 44;Bombardments - 23;
Michelle ToledoFolsom Fire Department535 Glenn DriveFolstom, CA 95630Folsom Chamber of CommerceAttn: Libby Siino200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Fireworks & Stage FX America, Inc. on behalf of the Sponsor Listed Above requests a permit toconduct a public display of fireworks in accordance with Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances.7/3/20269:45pmSite Information:Authority having Jurisdiction:Client:Date(s):PyrotechnicOperator(s)and LicenseNumber:(where required)Dan Russell Arena200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Brandon Waits 2936-02(Operator Name) (License No.)and assistants.Proof of currentGeneral Liability Insurance and Workers CompensationInsurance isattached.Adetailed diagramof the proposed firing site isattached.Ground Level Pyrotechnics (0 - 50 Foot typical Altitude):Low Level Pyrotechnics (51 - 125 foot typical altitude):Aerial Pyrotechnics (>125 foot typical altitude):
26145
PERMISSION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF PYROTECHNICS AS SPECIFIED HEREINIS HEREBY: PERMITTED DENIEDSignature of Permitting Authority DateCircle AppropriateTitle Description of Display:Time/Length:7/3/2026, 7/4/20267.5 minOffice contact:Julie Andrews(619) 938-8277, Fax (619) 938-8273BrandonCell:916-802-4482Email:[email protected] Chamber of Commerce on 7/3/2026 in Folsom, Ca.Fireworks fired Electrically, in Racks. 26145Fireworks & Stage FX Permit Reference No.Printed 5/4/
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Application for Permit for a TheatricalDisplay of PyrotechnicsP. O. Box 488Lakeside, CA 92040-0488(619) 938-8277Fax (619) 938-8273 Michelle ToledoFolsom Fire Department535 Glenn DriveFolstom, CA 95630Folsom Chamber of CommerceAttn: Libby Siino200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Fireworks & Stage FX America, Inc. on behalf of the Sponsor Listed Above requests a permit toconduct a public display of fireworks in accordance with Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances.7/3/20269:45pmSite Information:Authority having Jurisdiction:Client:Date and Time:PyrotechnicOperator(s)and LicenseNumber:(where required)Dan Russell Arena200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Brandon Waits 2936-02(Operator Name) (License No.)and assistants.Proof of currentGeneral Liability Insurance and Workers CompensationInsurance isattached.Adetailed diagramof the proposed firing site isattached. 26145PERMISSION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF PYROTECHNICS AS SPECIFIED HEREINIS HEREBY: PERMITTED DENIEDSignature of Permitting Authority DateCircle AppropriateTitleFireworks America Permit Reference No.Printed 5/4/ Description of Pyrotechnics and Special Effects:Proximate DevicesQtySizeGeneral Public Display License Number 0528:Other Dates: 7/3/2026, 7/4/2026Office contact:Julie Andrews(619) 938-8277, Fax (619) 938-827330MM Assorted Mines30MM Assorted Comets1430BrandonCell:916-802-4482Email:[email protected]
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Application for Permit for aPublic Display of PyrotechnicsP. O. Box 488Lakeside, CA 92040-0488(619) 938-8277Fax (619) 938-8273 Devices - 44;Bombardments - 23;
Michelle ToledoFolsom Fire Department535 Glenn DriveFolstom, CA 95630Folsom Chamber of CommerceAttn: Libby Siino200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Fireworks & Stage FX America, Inc. on behalf of the Sponsor Listed Above requests a permit toconduct a public display of fireworks in accordance with Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances.7/4/20269:45pmSite Information:Authority having Jurisdiction:Client:Date(s):PyrotechnicOperator(s)and LicenseNumber:(where required)Dan Russell Arena200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Brandon Waits 2936-02(Operator Name) (License No.)and assistants.Proof of currentGeneral Liability Insurance and Workers CompensationInsurance isattached.Adetailed diagramof the proposed firing site isattached.Ground Level Pyrotechnics (0 - 50 Foot typical Altitude):Low Level Pyrotechnics (51 - 125 foot typical altitude):Aerial Pyrotechnics (>125 foot typical altitude):
26146
PERMISSION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF PYROTECHNICS AS SPECIFIED HEREINIS HEREBY: PERMITTED DENIEDSignature of Permitting Authority DateCircle AppropriateTitle Description of Display:Time/Length:7/3/2025, 7/4/20257.5 minOffice contact:Julie Andrews(619) 938-8277, Fax (619) 938-8273BrandonCell:916-802-4482Email:[email protected] Chamber of Commerce on 7/4/2026 in Folsom, Ca.Fireworks fired Electrically, in Racks. 26146Fireworks & Stage FX Permit Reference No.Printed 5/4/
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Application for Permit for a TheatricalDisplay of PyrotechnicsP. O. Box 488Lakeside, CA 92040-0488(619) 938-8277Fax (619) 938-8273 Michelle ToledoFolsom Fire Department535 Glenn DriveFolstom, CA 95630Folsom Chamber of CommerceAttn: Libby Siino200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Fireworks & Stage FX America, Inc. on behalf of the Sponsor Listed Above requests a permit toconduct a public display of fireworks in accordance with Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances.7/4/20269:45pmSite Information:Authority having Jurisdiction:Client:Date and Time:PyrotechnicOperator(s)and LicenseNumber:(where required)Dan Russell Arena200 Wool StreetFolsom, Ca 95630Brandon Waits 2936-02(Operator Name) (License No.)and assistants.Proof of currentGeneral Liability Insurance and Workers CompensationInsurance isattached.Adetailed diagramof the proposed firing site isattached. 26146PERMISSION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF PYROTECHNICS AS SPECIFIED HEREINIS HEREBY: PERMITTED DENIEDSignature of Permitting Authority DateCircle AppropriateTitleFireworks America Permit Reference No.Printed 5/4/ Description of Pyrotechnics and Special Effects:Proximate DevicesQtySizeGeneral Public Display License Number 0528:Other Dates: 7/3/2025, 7/4/2025Office contact:Julie Andrews(619) 938-8277, Fax (619) 938-827330MM Assorted Mines30MM Assorted Comets1430BrandonCell:916-802-4482Email:[email protected]
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
PO Box 488, Lakeside, CA 92040
“The Difference is Quality” Toll Free: 800-464-7976, Phone: 619-938-8277 Fax:
619-938-8273
May 4, 2026
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
1325 J Street Suite 1530
Sacramento, Ca 95814
RE: Overnight Storage of 1.3g Display Fireworks
To Whom it may concern,
This letter is to notify you of our plan to store 1.3g display fireworks at 403 Stafford St Folsom, CA 95623 from July 2nd to July 5th, 2026. This product will be under direct supervision of a California licensed technician, transferred to the site and under 24-hour supervision.
This is in full compliance with 27CFR Part 555 and ATF Ruling 2007-2. In compliance with this ruling the temporary storage will be fire resistant, weather resistant, and theft resistant. Each door will be equipped with a five-tumbler padlock. The area will have 24-hour security.
Thank you,
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4/5 /2 /6 /7 □ /9 □ /7 /10 /11 /12 /3 □ /0 /13 □ /11 /14 /3 /2 /1 /15 /11 /16 □ /17 /17 /15 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 □ /24 /25 □ /26 /27 /1 /28 /28 /29 /30 □ /31 /32 /33 /30 □ /34 /35 /20 /36 /19 /37 /36 /19 /35 /19 /26 /38 /25 /39 /40 /41 /42 /43 /40 /44 □ /24 /25 /44 □ /45 /19 /35 /20 /35 /46 /35 /20 /21 /21 /3 /47 /48 /49 /50 /32 /33 /49 /51 /52 □ /31 /32 /33 /30 □ /34 /35 /26 /36 /37 /35 /36 /19 /35 /19 /27 /26 /18 /45 /45 /37 /21 /21 /19 /27 /27
/17 /49 /53 /30 /52 /28 /30 /30 □ /34
/54 /55 /56 □ /57 /58 /59 /60 /61 /62 □ /64 /61 /65 /66 /60 /67 /68 □ /69 □ /70 /71 /72 /71 /73 /67 /60 □ /74 /75 /76 /56 /77 /78 /76 /79 /80 □ /38 /75 /81 /56 /82 /80 /56 □ /75 /80 □ /75/80 /80 /83 /56 /84 □ /85 /78 □ /85 /55 /56 □ /86 /87 /78 /88 /56 □ /38 /75 /81 /56 /82 /80 /56 /56 □ /87 /89 □ /85 /55 /56 □ /24 /86 /90 /75 /91 /78 /76 /82 /75 /86 □ /92 /91 /91 /75 /81/56 □ /78 /91 □ /85 /55 /56 □ /41 /85 /86 /85 /56 □ /74 /75 /76 /56 □ /93 /86 /76 /80 /55 /86 /90 □ /86 /82 /84 □ /94 /86 /89 /87 /56 □ /76 /56 /88 /78 /79 /56 /84 □ /78 /76 □ /80 /83 /80 /95 /56 /82 /84 /56 /84 □ /91/78 /76 □ /56 /76 /76 /78 /76 /80 □ /78 /76 □ /91 /78 /76 □ /95 /76 /78 /88 /75 /84 /75 /82 /96 □ /75 /82 /81 /78 /76 /76 /56 /81 /85 □ /75 /82 /91 /78 /76 /94 /86 /85 /75 /78 /82 □ /95 /76/78 /88 /75 /84 /56 /84 □ /97 /98 □ /100 /101 /102 □ /103 /104 /104 /105 /106 /107 /103 /108 /100 □ /109 /110 □ /107 /109 /111 /104 /103 /108 /98 □ /110 /102 /104 /110 /102 /112 /102 /108 /100 /103 /100 /106 /113 /102 /112 /114 □ □ /115 /101 /106 /112 □/105 /106 /107 /102 /108 /112 /102 □ /116 /109 /102 /112 □ /108 /109 /100 □ /112 /102 /110 /113 /102 □ /103 /112 □ /109 /110 □ /104 /110 /109 /113 /106 /116 /102 □ /103 /108 /98 □ /117 /103 /110 /110 /103 /108 /100 /106 /102 /112□ /109 /110 □ /96 /83 /86 /76 /86 /82 /85 /56 /56 /80 □ /78 /91 □ /81 /78 /82 /85 /75 /82 /83 /56 /84 □ /90 /75 /81 /56 /82 /80 /83 /76 /56 □ /86 /82 /84 □ /75 /80 □ /80 /83 /87 /118 /56 /81 /85 □ /85 /78□ /75 /82 /88 /56 /80 /85 /75 /96 /86 /85 /75 /78 /82 /119 /42 /80 /80 /83 /56 /84 □ /120 /89 □ /24 /78 /76 /85 /82 /56 /89 □ /121/86 /90 /79 /56 /76 /74 /75 /76 /56 □ /40 /82 /96 /75 /82 /56 /56 /76 /75 /82 /96 □ /38 /75 /81 /56 /82 /80 /56 □ /93 /86 /82 /86 /96 /56 /76 /74 /75 /76 /56 □ /40 /82 /96 /75 /82 /56 /56 /76 /75 /82 /96 □ /86 /82 /84 □ /42 /82 /88 /56 /80 /85 /75 /96 /86 /85 /75 /78 /82 /80 □ /43 /75 /88 /75 /80 /75 /78 /82 /122 /56 /88 /75 /56 /77 /56 /84 □ /86 /82 /84 □ /25 /95 /95 /76 /78 /88 /56 /84 □ /120 /89 □ /24 /86 /90 /56 /87 □ /123 /55 /75 /90 /90 /75 /95 /80 /123 /76 /78 /96 /76 /86 /94 □ /24 /78 /78 /76 /84 /75 /82 /86 /85 /78 /76 /74 /75 /76 /56 □ /40 /82 /96 /75 /82 /56 /56 /76 /75 /82 /96 □ /86 /82 /84 □ /42 /82 /88 /56 /80 /85 /75 /96 /86 /85 /75 /78 /82 /80 □ /43 /75 /88 /75 /80 /75 /78 /82 /92 /74 /74 /42 /24 /40 □ /92 /74 □ /54 /124 /40 □ /41 /54 /25 /54 /40 □ /74 /42 /122 /40 □ /93 /25 /122 /41 /124 /25 /38 /123 /90 /56 /86 /80 /56 □ /88 /75 /80 /75 /85 □ /81 /86 /90 /91 /75 /76 /56 /119 /96 /78 /88 /94 /78 /85 /83 /80 /119 /78 /76 /96 □ /91 /78 /76 □ /94 /78 /76 /56 □ /75 /82 /91 /78 /76 /94 /86 /85/75 /78 /82 □ /78 /82 □ /90 /75 /81 /56 /82 /80 /75 /82 /96 □ /86 /82 /84 □ /95 /56 /76 /94 /75 /85 /85 /75 /82 /96 □ /77 /75 /85 /55 □ /24 /25 /38 □ /74 /42 /122 /40 /125 /29 /126 /127 /49 /53 □ /31 /49 /28 /48 /127 /32 /128 □ /129 □ /12 /30 /52 /30 /50 /32 /127 /17 /1 /15 /3 /130 /7 /3 □ /130 /131 /14 /132 /3 /2 /34 /12 /125 /31 /129 /133 /134 /135 /136 /0 /5 /2
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4/5 /2 /6 /7 □ /17 /1 /15 /3 /130 /7 /3
/137 /138 /139 /140 /141 /142 /143 □ /145 /146 /147 /148 /149 /150/142 /151 /138 /148 /146 /152 /31 /49 /28 /48 /127 /32 /128 □ □ /11 /153 /153 /50 /30 /28 /28 /15 /49 /33 /128 /154 /49 /48 /15 /51 /29 /52 /33 /128 /155 /25 /122 /42 /92 /156 /41 /155 /25 /122 /42 /92 /156 /41 /35 /35 /35 /35 /35 □ /156 /41 /25 /57 /67 /157 /71 □ /158 □ /159 /160 □ /161Page 45
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4/5 /2 /6 /7 □ /9 □ /7 /10 /11 /12 /3 □ /0 /13 □ /11 /14 /3 /2 /1 /15 /11 □ /16 /16 /15 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 □ /23 /24 □ /25 /26 /1 /27 /27 /28 /29 □ /30 /31 /32 /29 □ /33 /34 /19 /35 /18 /36 /35 /18 /34 /18 /25 /37 /24 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 /43 □ /23 /24 /43 □ /44 /18 /34 /19 /34/3 /45 /46 /47 /48 /31 /32 /47 /49 /50 □ /30 /31 /32 /29 □ /33 /34 /25 /35 /36 /34 /35 /18 /34 /18 /26 /51 /52
/16 /47 /53 /29 /50 /27 /29 /29 □ /33
/54 /55 /56 □ /57/58 /59 /60 /61 /62 /63 /60 /61 /64 □ /65 /66 /67 /56 /68 /69 /67 /70 /71 □ /37 /66 /72 /56 /51 /71 /56 □ /66 /71 □ /66 /71 /71 /73 /56 /74 □ /75 /69 □ /75 /55 /56 □ /52/76 /69 /77 /56 □ /37 /66 /72 /56 /51 /71 /56 /56 □ /76 /78 □ /75 /55 /56 □ /23 /52 /79 /66 /80 /69 /67 /51 /66 /52 □ /81 /80 /80 /66 /72 /56 □ /69 /80 □ /75 /55 /56 □ /40 /75 /52 /75 /56□ /65 /66 /67 /56 □ /82 /52 /67 /71 /55 /52 /79 □ /52 /51 /74 □ /83 /52 /78 /76 /56 □ /67 /56 /77 /69 /70 /56 /74 □ /69 /67 □ /71 /73 /71 /84 /56 /51 /74 /56 /74 □ /80 /69 /67 □ /56 /67 /67 /69 /67 /71 □ /69/67 □ /80 /69 /67 □ /84 /67 /69 /77 /66 /74 /66 /51 /85 □ /66 /51 /72 /69 /67 /67 /56 /72 /75 □ /66 /51 /80 /69 /67 /83 /52 /75 /66 /69 /51 □ /84 /67 /69 /77 /66 /74 /56 /74 □ /76 /78 □ /75/55 /56 □ /86 /87 /87 /88 /89 /90 /86 /91 /92 □ /94 /95 □ /90 /94 /96 /87 /86 /91 /97 □ /95 /98 /87 /95 /98 /99 /98 /91 /92 /86 /92 /89 /100 /98 /99 /101 □ □ /102 /103 /89 /99 □ /88 /89 /90 /98 /91 /99 /98□ /104 /94 /98 /99 □ /91 /94 /92 □ /99 /98 /95 /100 /98 □ /86 /99 □ /94 /95 □ /87 /95 /94 /100 /89 /104 /98 □ /86 /91 /97 □ /105 /86 /95 /95 /86 /91 /92 /89 /98 /99 □ /94 /95 □ /106 /107 /86/95 /86 /91 /92 /98 /98 /99 □ /69 /80 □ /72 /69 /51 /75 /66 /51 /73 /56 /74 □ /79 /66 /72 /56 /51 /71 /73 /67 /56 □ /52 /51 /74 □ /66 /71 □ /71 /73 /76 /108 /56 /72 /75 □ /75 /69 □ /66 /51 /77 /56 /71 /75 /66 /85 /52 /75/66 /69 /51 /109 /41 /71 /71 /73 /56 /74 □ /110 /78 □ /23 /69 /67 /75 /51 /56 /78 □ /111/52 /79 /70 /56 /67 /65 /66 /67 /56 □ /39 /51 /85 /66 /51 /56 /56 /67 /66 /51 /85 □ /37 /66 /72 /56 /51 /71 /56 □ /82 /52 /51 /52 /85 /56 /67 /65 /66 /67 /56 □ /39 /51 /85 /66 /51 /56 /56 /67 /66 /51 /85 □ /52 /51 /74 □ /41 /51 /77 /56 /71 /75 /66 /85 /52 /75 /66 /69 /51 /71 □ /42 /66 /77 /66 /71 /66 /69 /51 /112 /56 /77 /66 /56 /68 /56 /74 □ /52 /51 /74 □ /24 /84 /84 /67 /69 /77 /56 /74 □ /110 /78 □ /23 /52 /79 /56 /76 □ /113 /55 /66 /79 /79 /66 /84 /71 /113 /67 /69 /85 /67 /52 /83 □ /23 /69 /69 /67 /74 /66 /51 /52 /75 /69 /67 /65 /66 /67 /56 □ /39 /51 /85 /66 /51 /56 /56 /67 /66 /51 /85 □ /52 /51 /74 □ /41 /51 /77 /56 /71 /75 /66 /85 /52 /75 /66 /69 /51 /71 □ /42 /66 /77 /66 /71 /66 /69 /51 /81 /65 /65 /41 /23 /39 □ /81 /65 □ /54 /114 /39 □ /40 /54 /24 /54 /39 □ /65 /41 /112 /39 □ /82 /24 /112 /40 /114 /24 /37 /84 /79 /56 /52 /71 /56 □ /77 /66 /71 /66 /75 □ /72 /52 /79 /80 /66 /67 /56 /109 /85 /69 /77 /83 /69 /75 /73 /71 /109 /69 /67 /85 □ /80 /69 /67 □ /83 /69 /67 /56 □ /66 /51 /80 /69 /67 /83 /52 /75/66 /69 /51 □ /69 /51 □ /79 /66 /72 /56 /51 /71 /66 /51 /85 □ /52 /51 /74 □ /84 /56 /67 /83 /66 /75 /75 /66 /51 /85 □ /68 /66 /75 /55 □ /23 /24 /37 □ /65 /41 /112 /39 /4/115 /49 /116 /29 /27 /31 /116 /29 /48
/16 /1 /15 /3 /117 /7 /3 □ /117 /118 /14 /119 /3 /2 /33 /4/120 /121 /121 /122 /123 /0 /5 /2
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4/5 /2 /6 /7 □ /16 /1 /15 /3 /117 /7 /3
/124 /63 /125 /61 □ /127 □ /59 /128 □ /127Page 46
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4/5 /2 /6 /7 □ /9 □ /7 /10 /11 /12 /3 □ /0 /13 □ /11 /14 /3 /2 /1 /15 /11 /16 □ /17 /17 /15 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 □ /24 /25 □ /26 /27 /1 /28 /28 /29 /30 □ /31 /32 /33 /30 □ /34 /35 /20 /36 /19 /20 /36 /19 /35 /19 /26 /37 /25 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 /43 □ /24 /25 /43 □ /44 /19 /35 /20 /35 /45 /35 /20 /21 /21 /3 /46 /47 /48 /49 /32 /33 /48 /50 /51 □ /31 /32 /33 /30 □ /34 /35 /26 /36 /52 /35 /36 /19 /35 /19 /27 /26 /18 /44 /45 /44 /52 /21 /45 /21 /19 /27 /27
/17 /48 /53 /30 /51 /28 /30 /30 □ /34
/54 /55 /56 □ /57 /58 /59 /60 /61 /62 /63 /61 /64 /65 /66 /59 /60 /61 /62 /63 /61 □ /67 /68 /69 /56 /70 /71 /69 /72 /73 □ /37 /68 /74 /56 /75 /73 /56 □ /68 /73 □ /68 /73 /73 /76 /56 /77 □ /78/71 □ /78 /55 /56 □ /79 /80 /71 /81 /56 □ /37 /68 /74 /56 /75 /73 /56 /56 □ /80 /82 □ /78 /55 /56 □ /24 /79 /83 /68 /84 /71 /69 /75 /68 /79 □ /85 /84 /84 /68 /74 /56 □ /71 /84 □ /78 /55/56 □ /40 /78 /79 /78 /56 □ /67 /68 /69 /56 □ /86 /79 /69 /73 /55 /79 /83 □ /79 /75 /77 □ /87 /79 /82 /80 /56 □ /69 /56 /81 /71 /72 /56 /77 □ /71 /69 □ /73 /76 /73 /88 /56 /75 /77 /56 /77 □ /84 /71 /69 □ /56 /69 /69/71 /69 /73 □ /71 /69 □ /84 /71 /69 □ /88 /69 /71 /81 /68 /77 /68 /75 /89 □ /68 /75 /74 /71 /69 /69 /56 /74 /78 □ /68 /75 /84 /71 /69 /87 /79 /78 /68 /71 /75 □ /88 /69 /71 /81 /68 /77 /56 /77□ /80 /82 □ /78 /55 /56 □ /90 /91 /91 /92 /93 /94 /90 /95 /96 □ /98 /99 □ /94 /98 /100 /91 /90 /95 /101 □ /99 /102 /91 /99 /102 /103 /102 /95 /96 /90 /96 /93 /104 /102 /103 /105 □ □ /106 /107 /93 /103 □ /92 /93 /94 /102 /95 /103 /102□ /108 /98 /102 /103 □ /95 /98 /96 □ /103 /102 /99 /104 /102 □ /90 /103 □ /98 /99 □ /91 /99 /98 /104 /93 /108 /102 □ /90 /95 /101 □ /109 /90 /99 /99 /90 /95 /96 /93 /102 /103 □ /98 /99 □ /110 /111 /90/99 /90 /95 /96 /102 /102 /103 □ /71 /84 □ /74 /71 /75 /78 /68 /75 /76 /56 /77 □ /83 /68 /74 /56 /75 /73 /76 /69 /56 □ /79 /75 /77 □ /68 /73 □ /73 /76 /80 /112 /56 /74 /78 □ /78 /71 □ /68 /75 /81 /56 /73 /78 /68 /89 /79 /78/68 /71 /75 /113 /41 /73 /73 /76 /56 /77 □ /114 /82 □ /24 /71 /69 /78 /75 /56 /82 □ /115/79 /83 /72 /56 /69 /67 /68 /69 /56 □ /39 /75 /89 /68 /75 /56 /56 /69 /68 /75 /89 □ /37 /68 /74 /56 /75 /73 /56 □ /86 /79 /75 /79 /89 /56 /69 /67 /68 /69 /56 □ /39 /75 /89 /68 /75 /56 /56 /69 /68 /75 /89 □ /79 /75 /77 □ /41 /75 /81 /56 /73 /78 /68 /89 /79 /78 /68 /71 /75 /73 □ /42 /68 /81 /68 /73 /68 /71 /75 /116 /56 /81 /68 /56 /70 /56 /77 □ /79 /75 /77 □ /25 /88 /88 /69 /71 /81 /56 /77 □ /114 /82 □ /24 /79 /83 /56 /80 □ /117 /55 /68 /83 /83 /68 /88 /73 /117 /69 /71 /89 /69 /79 /87 □ /24 /71 /71 /69 /77 /68 /75 /79 /78 /71 /69 /67 /68 /69 /56 □ /39 /75 /89 /68 /75 /56 /56 /69 /68 /75 /89 □ /79 /75 /77 □ /41 /75 /81 /56 /73 /78 /68 /89 /79 /78 /68 /71 /75 /73 □ /42 /68 /81 /68 /73 /68 /71 /75 /85 /67 /67 /41 /24 /39 □ /85 /67 □ /54 /118 /39 □ /40 /54 /25 /54 /39 □ /67 /41 /116 /39 □ /86 /25 /116 /40 /118 /25 /37 /117 /83 /56 /79 /73 /56 □ /81 /68 /73 /68 /78 □ /74 /79 /83 /84 /68 /69 /56 /113 /89 /71 /81 /87 /71 /78 /76 /73 /113 /71 /69 /89 □ /84 /71 /69 □ /87 /71 /69 /56 □ /68 /75 /84 /71 /69 /87 /79 /78/68 /71 /75 □ /71 /75 □ /83 /68 /74 /56 /75 /73 /68 /75 /89 □ /79 /75 /77 □ /88 /56 /69 /87 /68 /78 /78 /68 /75 /89 □ /70 /68 /78 /55 □ /24 /25 /37 □ /67 /41 /116 /39 /1 /119 /47 /50 /49 /33 /30 /49 /120 /3 /46 /47 /50 /49 /33 /30 /49 /17 /1 /15 /3 /121 /7 /3 □ /121 /122 /14 /123 /3 /2 /34 /1 /120 /3 /124 /125 /125 /126 /127 /0 /5 /2
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4/5 /2 /6 /7 □ /17 /1 /15 /3 /121 /7 /3
/128 /129 /130 /63 □ /132 □ /60 /133 □ /132Page 47
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.
06/09/2026 Item No.4.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE:
6/9/2026
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Calendar
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11638 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for Construction Management Services in the Amount of $521,438.77 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to be reimbursed from a Federal Grant for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No.
PW2305
FROM: Public Works Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11638 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for Construction Management Services in the Amount of $521,438.77 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to be reimbursed from a Federal Grant for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No.
PW2305.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On December 8, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10571, authorizing staff to submit grant applications to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) for the 2020 –21 Funding Round. One of the regional projects submitted and successfully approved for funding was the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project.
The upcoming construction project consists of purchasing and installing new ITS equipment, including advanced traffic signal controllers; closed -circuit television cameras (CCTVs) to monitor traffic flow; upgrades and installation of fiber optic, including all necessary trenching and pavement restoration, installation of communication equipment to fill gaps that expand the capabilities of the Traffic Management Center; and expansion of signal performance measures
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
2 (SPM) software to proactively adjust signal timing and identify maintenance issues for more than 120 traffic signals throughout the City of Folsom. These improvements will enhance the City’s ability to monitor traffic conditions in real time, improve signa l coordination, and respond more quickly to congestion and maintenance needs.
Final design is now complete, and Caltrans has formally authorized the construction phase and approved the allocation of federal funding, positioning the project to begin active construction in August 2026, with work anticipated to conclude in early 2027.
Most recently, on March 24, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11579, authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction phase Program Supplement Agreement with Caltrans for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No.
PW2305, Federal Project No. 5288(052). Approving this agreement formally establishes the mechanisms for the City to receive federal reimbursements for eligible construction expenditures, including the costs associated with the construction management services agr eement under consideration today.
Because this project is federally funded via Caltrans Local Assistance, the City must strictly adhere to the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), which requires exhaustive daily documentation, certified payroll tracking, and specialized mate rial testing to maintain reimbursement eligibility. Retaining Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. provides the full -time, specialized field inspection and technical expertise necessary to verify integration with the City's Traffic Management Center without divert ing limited internal Public Works staff from daily municipal operations.
Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. will provide specialized construction management services divided into three operational phases:
• Pre-Construction Services: Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. will perform quality assurance and a 100% plan constructability review, establish document control systems, verify contract compliance with local assistance procedures, record existing site conditions, and facilitate the pre-construction conference.
• Construction Services: The firm will provide full-time field inspection and daily reporting, administer contracts and progress payments, review submittals and RFIs, monitor schedule control, enforce safety and labor compliance, and handle materials testing , utility coordination, and traffic control inspections.
• Post-Construction Services: To close out the project, Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. will verify and deliver independent stamped "As -Built" plans, manage and track punch list completion, and prepare the final expenditure report package to maintain federal funding reimbursement eligibility.
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
3 A map of the project limits is shown below:
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $77,426 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
On March 17, 2026, the Public Works Department advertised a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the project. Four proposals were received by the April 16, 2026 deadline, and one was deemed non-responsive due to incompleteness. A five-member panel evaluated the competitive proposals and conducted oral interviews in strict compliance with Chapter 10 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Based on the final evaluation of combined technical qualifications and interview perfor mance, Ghirardelli A ssociates, Inc. was determined to be the top-ranked, most qualified firm. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. in the amount of $521,438.77.
The Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project , Project No.
PW2305, was included in the City’s approved Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
4 with a budget of $5,078,312 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446). On February 9, 2026, the Feder al Highway Administration authorized the E -76 Allocation to proceed with the Construction and Construction Engineering phase . The total federal funding approved for the project across all phases is $5,716,000. A historical breakdown of the project funding allocations is summarized below:
Project Phase Fiscal
Year Funding Source Federal
Allocation
Local
Match Total Budgeted
Design 2022
Highway
Infrastructure
Program (HIP)
$114,507 $0.00 $114,507
Design 2022
Regional Surface
Transportation
(RSTP)
$785,493 $0.00 $785,493
Construction /
Construction
Management
2026
Regional Surface
Transportation
(RSTP)
$4,816,000 $0.00 $4,816,000
TOTAL
PROJECT
$5,716,000 $0.00 $5,716,000
The contract under consideration will utilize the newly authorized $4,816,000 in federal construction funding. Because the California Department of Transportation has approved the use of Toll Credits to satisfy the local match requirement, no local cash match from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) is required for this action. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Costs would be funded through the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and reimbursed by the federal grant. If additional pavement restoration is needed beyond the scope of the proposed project, the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) will be used to cover that portion of work.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
If approved the agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for construction management services in the amount of $521,438.77 will be funded through the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) in the ITS Master Plan Implementation Project , Project No. PW2305. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to cover the cost of the agreement and will be subsequently reimbursed by the federal grant.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Construction Management Services do not require further environmental review because the underlying project has already received all necessary environmental clearances. The project has been deemed Categorically Exempt from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) under Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Categorical Exclusion 23 CFR § 771.117(c)(21), and Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the State
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
5 CEQA Guidelines Class 1 Exemption (Section 15301), in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15300 et seq.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11638 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for Construction Management Services in the Amount of $521,438.77 in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) to be reimbursed from a Federal Grant for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No.
PW2305
Respectfully Submitted,
__________________________________
Rebecca Neves, Public Works Director/City Engineer
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
Resolution No. 11638
RESOLUTION NO. 11638
RESOLUTION NO. 11638 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $521,438.77 IN THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND (FUND 446) TO BE REIMBURSED
FROM A FEDERAL GRANT FOR THE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT, PROJECT NO.
PW2305
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10571, authorizing staff to submit grant applications to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) for the 2020–21 Funding Round; and
WHEREAS, the City has completed the design phase , and on February 9, 2026, the Federal Highway Administration authorized E -76 Sequence No. 6, releasing $4,816,000.00 in federal Regional Surface Transportation Program funding for the Construction and Construction Engineering phase; and
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2026, Public Works staff advertised a Request for Proposals for construction management services, contract administration and inspection services, and subsequently conducted a Qualifications -Based Selection process in strict compliance with Chapter 10 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual; and
WHEREAS, following comprehensive proposal scoring and panel interviews, Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified firm to support project delivery , and Public Works staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. in the amount of $521,438.77; and
WHEREAS, Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. will perform Pre-Construction Services , Construction Services , and Post -Construction Services includ ing but not li mited to , document control systems, verifying contract compliance with local assistance procedures, recording existing site conditions, field inspection and daily reporting , administer contract and progress payments , handle materials testing, utility coordination , delivery of independent stamped "As -Built" plans, and preparing the final expenditure report package to maintain federal funding reimbursement eligibility
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted in the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No. PW2305, utilizing the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) and federal grant reimbursements will be deposited into the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
Resolution No. 11638
Construction Management Services in the amount of $521,438.77 in the Transportation Improvement Fund ( Fund 446) to be reimbursed from a federal grant for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan Implementation Project, Project No. PW2305.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.
06/09/2026 Item No.5.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE:
6/9/2026
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Calendar
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11640 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Utilities Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Utilities Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11640 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and Appropriation of Funds.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Utilities Department identifies water infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water master plans, ongoing water condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. The City’s Water Master Plan (WMP) was last updated in 20 16 and is a key planning tool for water related infrastructure projects and programming for the Department. An important component of the WMP is the development of a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that shows the need for and timing of any improvements nec essary to correct deficiencies in the existing system and provide adequate service at build- out. The recommended projects are included in the City’s annual CIP budget and are one component incorporated into the City’s rate studies.
The following scope of work will be completed as part of the Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
2 • Data Review and Analysis: Examine and validate existing water system data to ensure its accuracy and completeness for effective modeling and planning. • Hydraulic Model Updates: Update and recalibrat e the hydraulic water model using InfoWater Pro to reflect current conditions and future needs. • Demand Analysis: Update and analyze average day, maximum day, and peak hour water demands, projecting both current and future requirements. This includes the refinement of zone specific diurnal curves.
• Capital Planning: Develop a ten-year capital improvement plan, including the preparation of cost estimates and prioritization of projects by fiscal year, to help guide future investments.
• Condition Assessment: Establish a robust program to evaluate the integrity and performance of infrastructure assets. Specifically develop a condition assessment approach for the City’s transmission mains.
• CEQA Analysis: Complete the environmental review in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act requirements.
• Reporting: Deliver comprehensive draft and final reports, providing actionable insights for City staff, stakeholders, and the public.
This Resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for consulting services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and appropriation of funds.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $77,426 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
On March 13, 2026, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to provide consulting services for the preparation of the City’s 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program. The City publicly advertised on March 13, 2026 for the Request for Proposal through the Sacramento Bee. Additionally, the RFP was made available on www.virtual-bid.com, www.publicpurchase.com, and the City’s website.
On April 16, 2026, Utilities department staff received proposals from Verdantas, Inc. and SRT Consultants. The proposals were reviewed and scored for project understanding, project team staffing, relevant qualifications, scope of work, project approach, and relevant experience. The technical evaluations were scored as shown in Table 1 based on a maximum technical score of 80.
Consultant UT 1 UT 2 UT 3 UT 4 Average
SRT Consultants 67 67 62 66 65.5
Verdantas, Inc. 68 73 78 69 72.0
Table 1: Consultant Technical Scores without Costs
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
3 After reviewing each proposal for project understanding, project team staffing, relevant qualifications, scope of work, project approach, and relevant experience, the proposals were reviewed for project costs. The fee schedules for the scope of work outlined in the request for proposal from each consultant are shown in Table 2.
Consultant Fee Amount
SRT Consultants $362,722.14
Verdantas, Inc. $279,196
Table 2: Consultant Project Costs
Verdantas, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the city based on the fee amount, past municipal project experience involving work of similar scope and their familiarity with the City’s water hydraulic model as they developed the current hydraulic model and currently perform updates and maintenance on the hydraulic model . Additionally, Verdantas, Inc. included a sub- consultant, HDR, that has significant experience working on the water treatment plant processes described in the RFP.
Table 3 shows the overall total scores including project costs based on a maximum score of 100.
Consultant
Technical Score
(Avg.)
Cost Score Total Score
SRT Consultants 65.5 15.4 80.9
Verdantas, Inc. 72.0 20.0 92.0
Table 3: Consultant Overall Scoring Including Project Costs
This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for consulting services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and appropriation of funds.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
If approved, the agreement with Verdantas, Inc. would be in the amount of $279,196 with $193,493 funded through the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 funded through the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) . The agreement will require an appropriation of $85,703 in the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521). Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for this agreement. Sufficient funds are available in the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for the requested appropriation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Citywide water infrastructure facilities have previously been evaluated at various levels of detail through previous environmental studies associated with the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, General Plan and recent amendments to the General Plan.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
4 As part of the scope of work, the project team will prepare an administrative Initial Study (IS) based on State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G that will be the basis of the environmental document to be prepared. They will incorporate the previous environmental analyses from the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, General Plan, and recent amendments to the General Plan to determine if the Water Master Plan improvements would create greater or new impacts to the environmental.
The IS will comply with CEQA Guidelines and City standards and is anticipated to support an ND. It will include the project description, regulatory and environmental context, permits, policy consistency, environmental evaluation, mitigation measures, findi ngs of significance, and evidence of public and agency coordination. Baseline conditions will be defined geographically, impacts will be assessed against significance criteria, and sources will be fully cited for a defensible CEQA record.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 11640 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and Appropriation of Funds
2. Verdantas, Inc. Proposal Scope
3. Verdantas, Inc. Proposal Fee
Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Attachment 1
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Resolution No. 11640
RESOLUTION NO. 11640
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH VERDANTAS, INC. FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE 2026 WATER MASTER PLAN AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR $279,196 WITH $193,493 ALLOCATED FROM THE WATER OPERATING FUND (FUND 520) AND $85,703 ALLOCATED FROM THE WATER CAPITAL FUND (FUND 521) AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has identified the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water system; and
WHEREAS, Verdantas, Inc. by reason of their past experience and abilities for performing these types of services are qualified to perform the required consulting services for the project; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) for $193,493 for this agreement; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for this agreement and the requested appropriation in the amount of $85,703; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Verdantas, Inc. for Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program for $279,196 with $193,493 allocated from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $85,703 allocated from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) and Appropriation of Funds
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $85,703 for this agreement. The appropriation will be made in the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for the amount of $85,703.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9
th day of June, 2026, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Attachment 2
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Proposal to Provide
Consulting Services for the
2026 Water Master Plan and
Condition Assessment Program
Submitted to Submitted by
April 16, 2026
80 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 280
Folsom, CA 95630
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Table of Contents
A. Transmittal Letter 2
B. Introduction 3
C. Scope of Work 5
D. Consultant and Sub-Consultant Staff 20
E. Consultant Qualifications and References 23
F. Team Resumes 28
G. Consultant Rate Schedule 35
Appendix A. Sample Agreement Modifications
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
80 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 280
Folsom, California 95630
+1 916-608-2212
Verdantas.com
A. Transmittal Letter April 16, 2026
City of Folsom
Attention: Marcus Yasutake, Utilities Director
Utilities Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
Subject: Response to Request for Proposals for Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program RFP
Verdantas Inc. (Verdantas) is pleased to provide the City of Folsom (City) with our proposal to develop the City’s 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program. Verdantas is an engineering, planning, and science services company made up of more than 2,200 diverse professionals across the country, many coming from strategic acquisitions of well-established firms, including water-industry experts Peterson Brustad Inc. (PBI). Now a part of Verdantas, our team has been supporting City projects since 2005 and has extensive experience working with the City. We are excited about the opportunity to continue working with the City on this project. We are confident that Verdantas will make an exceptional partner for the City of Folsom for the following reasons:
Verdantas completed the City’s 2016 Water Master Plan Update. Having completed the City’s 2016 Water Master Plan Update and continuing to support the City with on-call hydraulic modeling needs, Verdantas brings unparalleled institutional knowledge of Folsom’s water system and long-term resource needs. That foundation, combined with our proven planning and analytical tools, positions our team to seamlessly support the City’s current Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program.
Experienced, highly qualified professionals specialized in the water industry are committed to your project. Karl Brustad, PE, will provide overall quality control for the project. Karl has a background that is specialized in water projects and he has a long history of supporting water planning studies for numerous clients, including water master plans and UWMP’s. We are proposing Ashley Smith as the Project Manager for this project. Ashley managed the development of the City’s 2016 Water Master Plan and continues supporting the City with on-call hydraulic modeling support services. Ashley has also managed several transmission main condition assessment programs throughout the region. Ashley’s extensive experience supporting water planning studies makes her a perfect fit for your project. Right team, right fit. We are teaming with HDR and Dudek on this project. HDR will provide the City with Water Treatment Plant System Analysis while Dudek provides CEQA Support Services. They both bring decades of experience that will help ensure the WTP System Analysis and CEQA Support aspects of the scope of work are done to industry-standard expectations.
FIRM CONTACT INFORMATION
Verdantas – Folsom Office
80 Blue Ravine Road | Suite 280
Folsom, CA 95630
Primary Contact:
Ashley Smith, PE
(530) 200-6309 | [email protected]
Verdantas – Irvine Office
2600 Michelson Drive | Suite 400
Irvine, CA 92612
Signing Authority:
Kristen Williams, PG
(949) 681-4273 | [email protected]
A proven approach gets the job done right. Successful approaches breed successful projects, and we bring proven techniques to every stage of project development. From project management techniques that optimize project performance to good relationships with regulators, we keep the project on-track at every stage, saving our clients time and money in the short term, and delivering lasting value in the long-term. We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Folsom and are committed to providing quality service to you and the community you serve. We also acknowledge receipt of Addendum No. 1 issued on April 1, 2026.
Respectfully Submitted,
Kristen Williams, PG
Vice President/Area Lead
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 3
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
B. Introduction
Verdantas Inc. (Verdantas) is a nation-wide company specialized in engineering, planning, and science services to support their clients’ sustainability, resiliency, and strategic infrastructure objectives. Verdantas has grown exponentially in the last six years, strategically acquiring firms including Peterson Brustad Inc. (PBI). PBI was originally founded in September 2005 to provide engineering consulting services for the water industry.
We are diversified within the water resources realm and provide planning and design services for water and wastewater system master planning, distribution systems, water and wastewater treatment, water storage and pump station systems, well rehabilitation and new well development, wastewater collection systems, storm water management, integrated water resources management, and flood management support.
Karl Brustad, a founding principal of PBI and now an Assistant Vice President for Verdantas Inc., has more than 30 years of experience in the water industry, and is actively involved in project delivery. He ensures that his clients receive expert attention, high quality products, and outstanding client service. Our team has decades of experience delivering industry leading civil engineering design and consulting services that help our water clients move projects forward in support of our local communities.
As a subconsultant to Verdantas, HDR will support Task 7 – Water Treatment Plant System Analysis by providing a focused, data driven evaluation of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant (WTP) processes and associated infrastructure. Their approach emphasizes capacity verification, reliability, and operational redundancy to ensure the WTP can reliably meet projected average day, maximum day, and peak hour demands through build out while maintaining regulatory compliance and operational flexibility.
As a subconsultant to Verdantas, Dudek will support Task 10 – CEQA Support to ensure that the recommended capital improvements resulting from this project are compliant with CEQA requirements. It as anticipated that this project will be an Initial Study Negative Declaration (IS/ND).
History of Repeat Business
The true measure of a firm’s quality of service
comes in the form of repeat business. More
than 80% of legacy PBI’s annual services over
the last ten years were from repeat clients,
who now receive the same level of
specialized care and the additional benefits
of the larger Verdantas team. In the last
twenty years, our team has amassed multiple
projects with many of our clients shown in
the table to the right. These clients have
come to trust us with their water and
wastewater infrastructure and water
resource projects. Our team has completed
over 35 projects with the City of Folsom
alone.
# of projects
completed Repeat Clients
75+ California American Water (Cal Am)
35+ City of Folsom
35+ Placer County Water Agency (PCWA)
30+ Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (SBFCA)
30+ San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
(SJAFCA)
30+ Calaveras County Water District (CCWD)
20+ Sacramento Suburban Water District
(SSWD)
20+ San Joaquin County (SJC)
8 El Dorado Irrigation District (EID)
6 Fair Oaks Water District (District)
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 4
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Relevant Experience
Verdantas has provided continuous water-related planning and technical services to the City for over two decades, including water master planning, hydraulic model updates, and on-call system modeling support. Verdantas prepared the City of Folsom’s 2016 Water Master Plan Update, providing comprehensive data review and analysis, development of water demand projections, evaluation of demand management measures, and assessment of population and demographic trends. Our team evaluated system supplies and water supply reliability; updated the City’s hydraulic models for existing, intermediate, and build-out conditions; and evaluated the water system relative to current and future demands consistent with the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan.
The effort culminated in identification of system improvements and development of a 10-year Capital Improvement Program with cost estimates, along with preparation of the draft and final master plan reports.
In addition to recently completing a model update to the Folsom Plan Area (FPA), our team has been working directly with the City to develop an updated FPA infrastructure phasing plan to better guide on-going development.
Because of these prior efforts, we are intimately familiar with the City’s water system. Verdantas’ familiarity with the City’s hydraulic model is unparalleled, making our team the best choice for a streamlined master plan update.
In addition, Verdantas has developed numerous water master plans for our clients, which included condition assessments of existing facilities, development of hydraulic models for the evaluations of distribution systems, identification of deficiencies, alternatives analysis and identification of recommended improvements used to support the development of capital improvement programs. The Verdantas team has supported water master plans and hydraulic modeling for both large and small water agencies including: City of Folsom, Calaveras County Water District, Fair Oaks Water District, Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District, Calaveras Public Utility District, El Dorado Irrigation District, and Placer County Water Agency.
Verdantas has performed several risk-based assessments for neighboring agencies to streamline transmission main condition assessments. This methodology has delivered measurable results for our clients such as the City of Roseville, Fair Oaks Water District, and El Dorado Irrigation District, empowering them to proactively manage risk and extend the service life of their water systems.
Verdantas brings proven expertise, having successfully
deployed external EM bracelet scanners for both Fair Oaks Water District and the City of Roseville. We strategically chose external scanners to eliminate costly shutdowns required for internal scanning, ensuring uninterrupted service while delivering actionable data for informed asset management and risk
reduction.
HDR brings 45 years of experience delivering water system planning, design, and implementation projects. Their experience with WTP improvements includes tiered condition assessment of treatment processes, critical equipment, and pipelines; evaluation of treatment alternatives; and development of a phased, implementable roadmap for long-term redundancy and resilience. HDR has done similar facilities plan updates for Placer County Water Agency and the City of Santa Cruz.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 5
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
C. Scope of Work
A. Overview and Summary
Verdantas understands that the City of Folsom is seeking to develop a comprehensive 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program. Verdantas has a thorough understanding of the City’s goals and the critical challenges facing this effort, as outlined below.
Understanding City Objectives
The main objectives for this project include:
• Data Review and Analysis: Examine and validate existing water system data to ensure its accuracy and completeness for effective modeling and planning.
• Hydraulic Model Updates: The project requires updating and recalibrating the hydraulic water model using InfoWater Pro to reflect current conditions and future needs. • Demand Analysis: A critical component is to update and analyze average day, maximum day, and peak hour water demands, projecting both current and future requirements. This includes the refinement of zone specific diurnal curves.
• Capital Planning: The development of a ten-year capital improvement plan, including the preparation of cost estimates and prioritization of projects by fiscal year, will guide future investments. • Condition Assessment: Establishing a robust program to evaluate the integrity and performance of infrastructure assets is essential. Specifically developing a condition assessment approach for the City’s transmission mains.
• CEQA Analysis: Environmental review and compliance with California Environmental Quality Act requirements are integral to the planning process.
• Reporting: Delivery of comprehensive draft and final reports is required, providing actionable insights for City staff, stakeholders, and the public.
Verdantas recognizes that these objectives are designed to ensure the City’s water system remains resilient, well- maintained, and responsive to future growth and demand.
Understanding of Project Challenges
Several project challenges have been identified:
• Budget and Schedule Constraints: We understand that the City has an anticipated project budget of approximately $250,000, and that the City expects to maximize value, streamline processes, and maintain transparency regarding costs and hours. The schedule, beginning June 2026 and concluding by March 2027, calls for efficient management and early agreement on planning criteria. Our detailed project management plans have been proven successful in maintaining projects on time and within budget which is further described, herein.
•
Technical Robustness and Stakeholder Engagement: The plan must be technically robust and actionable. Experience with multi-pressure zone distribution systems and collaboration with City staff are key to achieving consensus and validating project data. Our team has a proven track record of assisting the City’s staff with modeling hydraulic challenges that the City faces and has intimate familiarity with the various pressure zones throughout the City’s system. We can leverage our familiarity of City’s system concerns to collaborate efficiently alongside the City in validating model data.
Addressing Water Vision Vulnerabilities: Building Redundancy in the Treatment Process The City of Folsom’s recently established Water Vision identified a critical vulnerability within the existing water
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 6
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
treatment system related to incomplete treatment process and conveyance redundancy. While the Water Treatment Plant has sufficient nominal capacity to meet projected buildout demands, the Vision notes that only a portion of this capacity is fully redundant and that several single-point-of-failure pipelines exist within and immediately downstream of the plant. Under certain equipment outage or pipeline failure scenarios—particularly during peak demand or concurrent stress conditions—these limitations could result in partial or complete loss of treated water supply, with reliance on storage and emergency interties that may only sustain short-duration impacts. As population growth, climate variability, and operational complexity increase, these redundancy gaps create systemwide risk that must be addressed through a comprehensive, system-level evaluation rather than isolated upgrades.
Verdantas’ team understands that the Water Treatment Plant System Analysis included in this scope is intended to address this vulnerability to advance the Water Vision’s goals for reliability and resiliency. Our team will evaluate treatment process redundancy, filter capacity constraints, and critical plant piping to quantify the maximum sustainable treated water output under credible failure scenarios. We will identify where existing single points of failure limit operational flexibility, assess the consequence and duration of potential outages, and evaluate how these vulnerabilities interact with peak demand, storage availability, and future supply conditions identified in the Water Vision.
Alignment with the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Alignment with the City’s forthcoming Urban Water Management Plan is critical. The Water Master Plan’s demand forecasts and planning criteria must be consistent with the latest data and recommendations, supporting sustainable growth and ensuring that all planning documents work in concert.
B. Project Approach
Successful approaches breed successful projects, and we bring proven techniques to every stage of project development . The following sections describe our approach to each of the primary project elements including:
water master plan update, hydraulic model update and calibration, WTP system analysis, and transmission main condition assessment.
Baseline Assumptions
Our approach to developing water master plans is to reach a common understanding with our clients on all assumptions and approaches in advance of updating the hydraulic model and developing a draft master plan. The first step is to present the planning/design criteria up front and utilize a workshop meeting to gain concurrence on the criteria prior to analyzing the system as a whole. This not only avoids possible rework but will help keep the project on schedule and on budget. This is a collaborative effort allowing us to provide recommendations, receive feedback from the City and ultimately summarize all critical assumptions and approaches that can be published in a Baseline Assumptions Technical Memorandum and agreed upon in advance of proceeding with model updates.
This has proven to be a very effective way in streamlining the process while avoiding unnecessary rework which allows the project to be completed within a 9-month timeline.
Figure 1. Sample Baseline Assumptions TM
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 7
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Intimate Familiarity with Existing Hydraulic Model
Because Verdantas recently completed the latest hydraulic model update in February, there is limited need to spend additional time reviewing the existing model. This distinct advantage allows our team to move immediately into demand updates and model calibration, setting us apart from other teams and enabling us to deliver results efficiently. We will work closely with City Staff to leverage our familiarity with system pressure zones to quickly and efficiently validate current operational settings to assist with the model calibration and validation.
Development of Updated Diurnal Curves by Zone
A realistic diurnal curve helps the model mimic field conditions, which is crucial for calibration of extended period simulations. During model calibration, using accurate zone-specific patterns improves the match between simulated and observed pressures/flows in each pressure zone. If incorrect patterns are used, the model might inaccurately predict tank drawdown or pressure drops at peak times. The City’s last diurnal curve assessment was performed in 2008 with the initial development of the model.
We will deliver a defensible, implementable solution
efficiently by leveraging our intimate familiarity with
the City’s hydraulic model and our working knowledge
of how the system is operated day-to-day—particularly
pump station control logic and PRV
setpoints/operating modes.
This familiarity is a key
differentiator, enabling faster start-up, fewer
calibration iterations, and a shorter path to decision- ready deliverables. This reduces ramp-up time, limits
avoidable rework, and allows us to focus data requests
on the handful of inputs that materially influence
diurnal patterns (zone boundary flows, tank levels,
interties, and known operational changes).
Our approach starts by confirming objectives and success criteria, then validating the current model representation of pump/PRV controls so demand patterns and operational settings are consistent. We will produce initial, zone-specific demand patterns promptly for early extended-period simulations, then refine them through targeted QA/QC (outlier screening, mass-balance verification using storage changes, and cross-comparisons across zones and seasons). Throughout the process, we prioritize close collaboration with City staff, maintaining a “no surprises” cadence with clear checkpoints and thoroughly documented decisions. This ensures that City stakeholders are actively engaged and have full visibility into what was done, why it was done, and how our deep understanding of the City’s model and operational parameters helps reduce schedule and delivery risk. By working hand-in-hand with the City, we build trust, foster transparent communication, and ensure that project outcomes align with the City’s goals and operational realities. Our diurnal curve development approach is outlined as follows:
• Align on zones and operations: Confirm our understanding of key pump/PRV controls (setpoints, schedules, modes) with City Operations staff.
• Targeted data, right resolution: Use 15-min to hourly flows, tank levels, pump status, and PRV settings; pull only the key tags/facilities.
• Data Validation and Transparency: Mass-balance check (inflow ± interties − ∆storage); compare each zones diurnal use patterns to known use patterns within each zone. • In Model Calibration: Apply patterns in the City’s model and refine using observed pressures/flows as provided by City’s Operations staff, accounting for pump/PRV/tank behavior.
Figure 2. Existing Zone 3 Diurnal Curve
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 8
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Model Calibration and Validation
For calibration of the hydraulic model, initial simulation runs will be made using estimated model parameters to ensure that the existing model results are reasonable and that there are no gross errors. Various calibration runs will then be made in steady-state mode and the model results will be evaluated for consistency with available data and field observations. If results are not reasonable, Verdantas will re-evaluate the adjustment parameters and re-run until a satisfactory match is obtained between modeled and observed values.
After an acceptable set of calibration parameters has been determined, Verdantas will examine the extent to which the set of calibrated values needs to be adjusted to match other steady-state demand simulations. In addition, to further refine the calibration, the calibration parameters will be used for time-varying conditions in an extended period simulation to see if there is reasonable agreement between modeled and observed pressures, flows, and tank water levels.
Depending upon the quality and quantity of available data, Verdantas will validate the model by running test data obtained under different conditions. For the validation, system demands, initial conditions, and operational rules will be adjusted to match the conditions at the time the test data was collected.
It is important to note that a discrepancy found during the calibration process can also mean that the system itself has problems. Possible problems include large leaks, unchartered services, previously undetected errors in the metered consumption, errors in recorded pipe sizes, unknown throttled or closed valves, worn pump impellers, or old construction debris left in pipes.
During the calibration process, it may be determined that additional supplemental data needs are required in order to achieve accurate model calibration or validation. If necessary, Verdantas will identify key locations and areas where additional data is needed and work cooperatively with the City to gather the information. For example, certain valves may need to be checked to ensure that they are not partially closed, or additional pressure readings may be needed in conjunction with tank level and/or flow meter readings. In addition, supplemental fire flow tests will be conducted to ensure model accuracy during peak demand and fire flow conditions.
This level of effort is based upon prior experience and assumes that up to 40 fire flow tests may be needed to support the calibration process. The fire flow tests are assumed to be performed with the assistance of City operations staff and will take up to 3 days in the field with our Staff Engineer. The first two fire flow tests will include the attendance of our Project Manager, Ashley Smith.
Water Treatment Plant System Approach
As a subconsultant to Verdantas, HDR will support the Water Treatment Plant System Analysis by providing a focused, data driven evaluation of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant (WTP) processes and associated infrastructure. Our approach emphasizes capacity verification, reliability, and operational redundancy to ensure the WTP can reliably meet projected average day, maximum day, and peak hour demands through build out while maintaining regulatory compliance and operational flexibility.
Data Review and Capacity Basis
We will begin by reviewing available background information provided by the City, including historical production data, process design criteria, operational setpoints, chemical usage records, filter run times, and residuals handling practices. Where available, we will confirm existing unit capacities against current operating constraints and identify any limiting conditions under peak demand or single unit outage scenarios. Capacity assessments will be coordinated with updated demand projections and distribution system analysis to maintain a consistent planning basis across the Water Master Plan.
Process Specific Evaluations
Using established water treatment design standards and best practices, we will systematically evaluate the
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 9
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
following WTP systems:
• Polymer and Chemical Feed Systems: Evaluate firm capacity, chemical storage duration, feed rate turndown, and redundancy to support peak treatment requirements and maintenance outages. • Pre Treatment and Clarification Processes: Confirm hydraulic and solids loading capacities relative to raw water quality variability and peak flow conditions. • Filter Facilities: Assess filter hydraulic capacity, filter loading rates, redundancy during backwash cycles, and operational flexibility under maximum day and peak hour conditions. • Backwash Systems: Review backwash supply, storage, pumping, and waste handling capacities to ensure reliable filter operations without constraining plant throughput. • Solids Handling Systems: Evaluate solids thickening, storage, and disposal capacity relative to current and projected solids production rates.
• Chlorine Contact Facilities: Verify effective contact time under peak flow and minimum baffling conditions for regulatory compliance.
• Pump Stations: Assess firm pumping capacity, redundancy, and operational flexibility to meet system demands and interface with downstream pressure zones.
Reliability and Redundancy Assessment
For each evaluated system, we will consider N 1 reliability, maintenance operational constraints, and critical single points of failure. Improvement needs will be identified where capacity shortfalls, limited redundancy, or aging infrastructure could affect operational resilience or regulatory compliance.
Improvement Identification and Coordination
Identified deficiencies will be translated into concept level improvement and expansion projects suitable for inclusion in the City’s 10-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Our findings and recommendations will be closely coordinated with the water master plan update to ensure consistency with distribution system triggers, demand forecasts, and overall Master Plan phasing. Improvements will be described at a planning level appropriate for future prioritization and cost estimating.
Deliverables
Our work will support development of concise technical memoranda, figures, and tabular summaries that clearly document assumptions, methodologies, and recommended WTP system improvements. These materials will be fully integrated into the Water Master Plan deliverables.
Condition Assessment Program Development Approach
We understand that the City of Folsom would like to develop a condition assessment program for their transmission mains 16in and larger, which total approximately 22 miles. The material types of the City’s transmission mains are predominantly mortar lined and coated steel and ductile iron pipe as shown below.
Our approach to developing a condition assessment program of the City of Folsom’s transmission mains will utilize 0 50,000
16 18 20 21 24 30 60
Length (feet)
Pipe Diameter (in)
Pipe Length by Diameter (Stacked by Material)
DuctileIron MortarLineCoatedSteel PrestressedConcreteCylinder
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 10
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
a typical asset management framework to provide recommendations for a replacement program. Condition assessment is one aspect of this process and can be performed in the field, via desktop, or both. AWWA’s latest Manual M77: Condition Assessment of Water Mains can be used as a guide to utilities on various practices available for condition assessment. This manual highlights that the higher the degree of inspection is, the higher the cost of the assessment will be.
Recognizing the importance of maximizing value and
minimizing unnecessary expenditures, we acknowledge that direct field condition assessments of the transmission mains are not included in this scope. Instead, our focus is on developing a robust and actionable program that empowers the City to proactively manage its assets. Deploying advanced technologies across all 22 miles of transmission mains would be cost- prohibitive and inefficient. By crafting a streamlined condition assessment framework, we equip the City to strategically pinpoint the segments and moments when high-impact
technologies should be utilized.
Verdantas strongly recommends launching the condition
assessment program with a targeted, risk-based desktop
evaluation that strategically identifies the highest-risk transmission main segments.
This approach ensures that
investments in advanced and more costly condition assessment technologies are focused where they will have the greatest impact—safeguarding critical infrastructure and optimizing resource allocation. This proven methodology has delivered measurable results for our clients such as the City of Roseville, Fair Oaks Water District, and El Dorado Irrigation District, empowering them to proactively manage risk and extend the service life of their water systems.
Verdantas’ recommends developing a program that starts
with an initial screening of the transmission mains utilizing a risk-based desktop evaluation that is consistent with AWWA- accepted methods. Risk can be expressed as the product of the consequence of failure (COF) and the likelihood of failure (LOF). Likelihood of failure for pipes is associated with various condition factors such as remaining useful life, material, and leak history. Consequence of failure is a measure of the impact on the community and customers of the potable
water system in the event that a failure of a transmission main occurs.
A customized pipe risk screening tool is recommended to support a desktop evaluation similar to the screening tool that Verdantas has developed for the City of Roseville. The results of the evaluation will identify the risk associated with each transmission main segment. The transmission
mains can then be prioritized by highest risk segments.
Likelihood and consequence of failure rankings are
combined into a matrix which prioritizes assets into risk- based categories. The potential risk scores and priority Figure 3. Asset Management Life Cycle
Figure 4. Risk Equation
5 5 10 15 20 25 Priority 1
4 4 8 12 16 20 Priority 2
3 3 6 9 12 15 Priority 3
2 2 4 6 8 10 Priority 4
1 1 2 3 4 5 Priority 5
1 2 3 4 5
Consequence of Failure
Likelihood of Failure
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 11
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
categories are shown in the typical risk matrix to the left. The resulting prioritized risk matrix would be the primary framework for defining the recommended implementation schedule for advanced technology field investigations.
Advanced technology field investigations will be reserved for the highest priority segments.
Electromagnetic (EM) inspection is an example of a proven advanced technology that delivers high-resolution results for steel mains by detecting areas of corrosion. Any reduction in the steel’s cross-sectional area directly impacts the pipe’s overall strength and can contribute to this deterioration. The goal of an electromagnetic scan is to pinpoint areas of wall loss. The industry offers diverse EM assessment tools, including internal and external scanners, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages; our team will provide a comprehensive evaluation to guide the City’s technology selection for maximum impact.
Verdantas brings
proven expertise, having successfully deployed external EM bracelet scanners for both Fair Oaks Water District and the City of Roseville.
We strategically chose external scanners to eliminate costly shutdowns required for internal scanning, ensuring uninterrupted service while delivering actionable data for informed asset management and risk reduction.
Detailed Scope of Work
The detailed scope of work is detailed as follows:
Task #1 – Information and Data Collection
Subtask 1.1 - This task includes the development of an information request memorandum to identify any data needs that will support the development of the baseline assumptions memorandum.
Task #2 – 2016 Water Master Plan Review
Subtask 2.1 - Verdantas will review the previous 2016 Water Master Plan document. Verdantas developed the previous 2016 Water Master Plan, so review will be minimal.
Task #3 – Water System Description
Subtask 3.1 -Verdantas will update the 2016 Water Master Plan and City General Plan, covering new facilities added since 2016. The scope includes: (1) service area description (current and future); (2) water system details (current and future); (3) operating characteristics for pressure zones, pump stations, reservoirs, valves, treatment, and distribution features; and (4) infrastructure maps showing pressure zones, reservoirs, booster pumps, flow control stations, and interties. Verdantas already has the operating characteristics of each pressure zone and will validate current information with City staff as part of the baseline assumptions memorandum.
Task #4 – Water Demand Analysis and Characterization
As part of the Water Demand Analysis and Characterization task, Verdantas will complete the following subtasks:
Subtask 4.1 - Identify existing and projected population in five-year increments to build-out using the City’s 2025 Draft Urban Water Management Plan figures.
Subtask 4.2 - Description and map of existing and projected land-use from the City’s most recent General Plan.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 12
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Subtask 4.3 - Update diurnal curves based on mass balance by zone. Subtask 4.4 - Summarize existing water use by land-use type using data from the City’s 2025 Draft Urban Water Management Plan
Subtask 4.5 - Summarize future water use through build-out by land-use type using data from the City’s 2025 Draft Urban Water Management Plan and make recommendations to update these or modify the land-use categories and include the necessary scope and fee to implement the recommendations. Subtask 4.6 - Include distribution system water loss based on the review of the City’s water loss audits submitted to the State.
Subtask 4.7 - Analyze the peaking factors for average day demand, maximum day demand, and peak hour demand and update each as needed through build-out.
Subtask 4.8 - Summarize water demands by pressure zone through build-out and compare to the information in the 2016 WMP.
Task 4 Deliverables:
Draft/final Baseline Assumptions Technical Memorandum.
Task 4 Assumptions:
Diurnal curve development based on data for production, storage, and flow between zones provided by City. Flow meters may need to be installed between zones and is assumed to be installed by others.
Task #5 – Hydraulic Model Update
As part of Hydraulic Model Update task, Verdantas will complete the following subtasks:
Subtask 5.1 – Describe current hydraulic model.
Subtask 5.2 - Describe modifications made to the existing water model. Subtask 5.3 - Verify operational set points for pump stations, reservoir levels, flow control facilities, and pressure zone boundaries.
Subtask 5.4 - Add necessary pipelines to include current water distribution network. Subtask 5.5 - Incorporate unit demand factors from Task 4 into updated hydraulic model. Subtask 5.6 - Recommend and implement the necessary actions for the validation and calibration of the hydraulic model, which shall include identifying key locations and City staff involvement to perform the necessary work.
Task 5 Assumptions:
Software used shall be updated in InfoWater Pro or ArcPro compatible software.
Task #6 – Water Distribution System Analysis
As part of the Water Distribution System Analysis and Characterization task, Verdantas will complete the following subtasks:
Subtask 6.1 - Analyze the water distribution system using the calibrated model through build-out in 5-year increments.
Subtask 6.2 – Develop system evaluation criteria based on latest performance criteria used for recent hydraulic analysis with the City.
Subtask 6.3 - Identify distribution system improvements.
Task 6 Assumptions:
Existing and buildout scenarios to be run on maximum day plus fire flow and peak hour demand. Final Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to be included in the Final Water Master Plan as part of Task 8.
Task #7 – Water Treatment Plant System Analysis (HDR)
Verdantas will identify any water treatment plant system improvements and recommend reliability and redundancy
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 13
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
projects for treatment processes and operations.
Subtask 7.1 – Data Review and Site Visits: HDR will perform a site visit at the City of Folsom WTP. Up to two HDR employees will attend for up to two hours. HDR will review relevant background information provided, including: (1) Existing WTP design criteria and nominal capacities; (2) Historical plant production and operational data; (3) Chemical usage records; (4) Available process flow diagrams and facility descriptions; (5) WTP as-built; (6) Historical raw water and treated water quality data (past five years); and (7) Past or ongoing WTP condition assessment data Subtask 7.2 – Water Treatment Process Capacity Evaluation: HDR will evaluate planning-level capacity, firm capacity, and operational constraints for the following WTP systems under average day and maximum day demand conditions:
1. Polymer Feed System Capacity – Evaluate feed rate capacity, storage duration, and redundancy.
2. Chemical Feed System Capacity – Assess overall chemical feed and storage capacity for treatment and disinfection processes.
3. Pre-Treatment Capacity – Review hydraulic and solids loading capacity relative to projected flow and raw water quality.
4. Filter Capacity – Evaluate hydraulic loading rates, filter availability during backwash, and redundancy.
5. Backwash System Capacity – Assess backwash supply, storage, pumping, and waste handling capacity.
6. Solids Handling Capacity – Evaluate solids generation rates and handling system capacity.
7. Chlorine Contact Tank Capacity – Review effective contact volume and detention time under peak flow conditions.
8. Pump Station Capacity – Assess firm pumping capacity, redundancy, and ability to meet projected operational demands.
Subtask 7.3 – Improvement Identification and Documentation: HDR will identify planning-level WTP improvement and expansion projects to address capacity, reliability, or redundancy deficiencies based on the agreed-upon target requirements for future WTP capacity. Each improvement will be developed to a conceptual level and a Class 5 cost estimate prepared. HDR will prepare concise technical memo summarizing the findings and recommendations to be incorporated into the Water Master Plan and Capital Improvement Program development.
Task 7 Deliverables:
Draft and Final technical memo.
Task 7 Assumptions:
Existing data to be provided by City within 2 (two) weeks of request for information The WTP analysis will rely on and incorporate the findings of the prior comprehensive WTP condition assessment, where applicable, to inform planning-level improvement recommendations. The system limitation identified will be related to:
o Single-unit outages (N-1 conditions).
o Maintenance operational constraints.
o Critical single points of failure.
The needed future capacity of the WTP (41 to 50 mgd estimated range) will be provided by the Prime Consultant based on input from HDR and the City.
All deliverables will be provided in electronic format.
Task #8 – Capital Improvement Program Development
Subtask 8.1 - Develop the necessary trigger points for implementation of capital projects. Prioritization will be given to the recommended improvements developed in Task 5 for implementation over the next 10 years by Fiscal Year. Verdantas will include Class 5 construction cost estimates for each project by Fiscal Year.
Task 8 Deliverables:
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 14
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
CIP including engineer’s estimate of probable costs for each project identified.
Task 8 Assumptions:
Final CIP to be incorporated into the Final Water Master Plan Task #9 – Condition Assessment Program Development
Verdantas will develop a condition assessment program and recommend a schedule of implementation. Subtask 9.1 - Identify up to three different technologies that can be used to perform condition assessment of the pipelines listed in Table 1.
Subtask 9.2 - Identify the pros and cons of each technology. Subtask 9.3 - Identify the infrastructure needs for each of the technologies (i.e. is an insertion point needed). Subtask 9.4 - Identify the costs associated with each technology. Subtask 9.5 - Recommend a condition assessment approach for each of the pipeline segments listed in Table 1, including any recommendations for the necessary inspection and testing of any cathodic protection systems.
Task 9 Deliverables:
Alternatives analysis for three different advanced assessment technologies.
Task 9 Assumptions:
Contracting of advanced assessment technologies excluded.
Task #10 – CEQA Support
Dudek will review existing City documents and confirm regulatory requirements and appropriate CEQA determination.
We anticipate that the WMP Update will require preparation of an Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND). Subtask 10.1 – CEQA Compliance Kickoff: Dudek will attend a virtual kick-off meeting with City staff and Verdantas. The purpose of the kickoff meeting is to: (1) identify relevant background data and technical studies; (2) clearly define the proposed project for the purposes of the environmental analysis; (3) discuss the cumulative scenario; (4) discuss the project schedule and important assumptions for achieving the schedule; (5) identify all anticipated discretionary actions; and (6) familiarize the Dudek team with the issues and concerns that the County determines to be important for analysis in the environmental document. Dudek will submit a Data Needs Request Form and a spreadsheet with questions to support preparation of the technical studies and the Initial Study (IS) analysis.
Subtask 10.2 – Project Description: Dudek will work with City staff and Verdantas to develop the project description that will define the project objectives, include narrative descriptions and figures showing the locations of planned improvements, identify the approximate implementation schedule, and outline design criteria and anticipated construction procedures. Dudek will submit a draft project description electronically and revise the project description based on City comments.
Subtask 10.3. AB 52 Support: Dudek will request a tribal contact list request through the Native American Heritage Commission and cultural resources records request through the North Central Information Center to obtain information on previously recorded cultural resources and investigations within the project area. We anticipate direct costs for the records search to be no more than $1,700. Dudek will provide limited support to the City in complying with the requirements of AB 52 by providing template letters for notification to Native American tribes regarding the project and assisting the City in responding to any tribal requests for information and/or consultation. Subtask 10.4 – Administrative Draft IS: Dudek will prepare an Administrative Draft IS evaluating the WMP update and proposed CIP improvements based on the CEQA IS checklist. The IS will comply with CEQA Guidelines and City standards and is anticipated to support an ND. It will include the project description, regulatory and environmental context, permits, policy consistency, environmental evaluation, mitigation measures, findings of significance, and evidence of public and agency coordination. Baseline conditions will be defined geographically, impacts will be assessed against significance criteria, and sources will be fully cited for a defensible CEQA record. Dudek will submit
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 15
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
the Administrative Draft IS electronically in PDF and Word as well as six hard copies for City review. Subtask 10.5 – Public Review IS/ND: Upon receiving a consolidated set of comments from the City, Dudek will revise the administrative draft IS and submit a screencheck IS/ND in the same format. After addressing any additional minor comments on the screencheck IS/ND, Dudek will prepare the Draft IS/ND for the 30-day public review period. Dudek will provide the IS/ND in PDF format that meets Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Level AA for posting on the City’s website. We assume that the City will be responsible for preparing public notices and submitting the notices to the Sacramento County Clerk and State Clearinghouse. Subtask 10.6 – Responses to Comments and Final IS/ND. Following conclusion of the public review period, Dudek will review all comments received in response to the draft IS/ND and categorize the comments by topic. It is assumed that no more than 20 unique substantive comments from agencies and the public will be received (note that a single comment letter may contain multiple comments). Dudek will prepare responses to the comments in a memo format, addressing the comments by topic (as opposed to numbering each individual comment and responding directly to each as is typically done in an EIR). If necessary, Dudek will also assemble text changes to the Final Initial Study/ND. Dudek will submit the responses and revised IS/ND to the City for review. We assume that a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will not be needed. Subtask 10.7 – City Council Adoption Support: Dudek will prepare a staff report to support City Council consideration of IS/ND adoption and draft the City Council Adopting Resolution. Dudek’s budget does not include participation in public hearings.
Subtask 10.8 – Tribal Consultations (Optional Task): At the request of the City, a Dudek Registered Professional Archeologist will assist the City in preparing for and participating in up to nine tribal consultation meetings which are assumed to last no more than 90 minutes each on average.
Task 10 Deliverables:
Draft and final CEQA project description.
Draft AB 52 notification letter templates.
Administrative Draft IS/ND (format as defined above). Screencheck and public draft IS/ND (six hard copies, Word and PDF electronic submittals). Public draft IS/ND also submitted in WCAG format.
Draft and final responses to comments memo and final IS/ND (six hard copies, Word and PDF electronic submittals, PDF submittal in WCAG format).
Draft and final Staff Report and Adopting Resolution for City Council approval (electronic submittal only; final versions in WCAG format).
Task 10 Assumptions:
Dudek will attend all meetings and public hearings virtually. The CEQA compliance kickoff meeting will last no more than one hour.
WMP Update improvements will be limited to those necessary to meet service demands consistent with buildout assumptions under the 2035 General Plan Amendments for Increased Residential Capacity Project Draft SEIR, will occur exclusively within existing right-of-way, and will not occur on any parcels that were not evaluated for sensitive environmental resources under the SEIR.
There will be no changes to the final CEQA project description throughout the CEQA compliance process. No technical studies will be required to support preparation of the IS/ND. The City will prepare and distribute all required public notices, conduct public outreach, and manage formal AB 52 consultation unless optional task 10.8 is authorized. No more than 20 unique comments will be received on the Public Draft IS/ND.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Verdantas.com 16
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Task #11 – Draft Report
Verdantas will develop a draft report and submit 6 hard copies, one electronic PDF copy, and one electronic Word copy for City review.
Task 11 Deliverables:
Draft Document
Task #12 – Final Report
Verdantas will develop a final report and submit 5 hard copies, one electronic Word copy, and one electronic ADA compliant PDF copy to the City.
Task 12 Deliverables:
Final Document
Task 12 Assumptions:
Final document will incorporate City comments from one consolidated round of review Task #13 – Supporting Documentation Provided to City
Verdantas will submit all supporting documentation to the City.
Task 13 Deliverables:
Source files for water model
Task #14 – Project Management
Verdantas will provide overall project management activities to keep the project on schedule and within budget. Tasks will include meetings, QA/QC, monthly invoicing and progress reporting, schedule updates, and budget management. Subtask 14.1 – General Project Management: Ashley Smith, project manager, will continuously review the project schedule and budget – if any deviations are identified Ashley will immediately notify the City and develop a corrective action plan to get the project back on schedule and within budget. Subtask 14.2 – Project Meetings: This task includes regularly scheduled calls to ensure the updated master plan is completed in a timely and efficient manner. This task includes a standing biweekly progress call with Verdantas’ project manager and the City’s project manager. We will provide an agenda for the biweekly call to keep it efficient and effective. These calls can range from 5 minutes to 30 minutes depending on the topics needing discussion. Our experience has found these standing calls to be very effective in keeping all parties informed and help keep projects on schedule and on budget. This task also includes up to four (4) project meetings. Subtask 14.3 – Quality Assurance/Quality Control: This task includes all quality assurance/control activities throughout the project. All deliverables will be reviewed and approved by Karl Brustad prior to delivery to the City. Subtask 14.4 – Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports: This task includes the development of monthly invoices that will be accompanied with monthly progress reports. The monthly invoices will detail hours by staff and include all expenses. The monthly progress reports will summarize the services provided during the month, identify any outstanding issues, include monthly cost by task and identify the remaining budget.
Task 14 Deliverables:
Meeting agendas (transmitted electronically), monthly invoices and monthly progress reports.
Task 14 Assumptions:
Project will be completed within 9 months of NTP.
Up to four (4) project review meetings
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 17
C. Project Schedule
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 18
D. Project Team
We understand that the City is seeking a qualified candidate to develop a clear, comprehensive, and actionable Water Master Plan that integrates with the City's long-term planning efforts. Our approach to planning studies is to confirm the planning criteria and client expectations up front during the kick-off meeting to gain concurrence with all team members prior to initiating any effort to ensure the utmost efficiency in the performance of the study. This not only avoids possible rework but will help keep the project on schedule and on budget.
Our team includes HDR for Task 7 and Dudek for Task 10, who’s efforts are anticipated to be approximately 65% of the total project. In order to manage a team of various members to a common goal, it is important to have a good project management plan. Our project management plan would include cadence calls with our team to ensure that our team is delivering on the City’s critical success factors for the project. This plan will also include schedule, budget, and quality control plans as described in the following sections.
Management of Schedule and Budget
We believe that good project management is essential to the success of a project. Our expertise and abilities as project managers have allowed Verdantas to provide specialized project management services for several of our clients’ projects and programs.
We believe in keeping all team members informed of the project status, which includes City staff, Verdantas staff, and other project stakeholders. To fulfill this need, we invite several team members to project meetings and send regular project updates to team members periodically via e-mail. We also like to utilize routine conference calls with the City’s project manager to provide status updates, address immediate needs, and ultimately keep the project on track and on schedule.
Constant oversight of the project budget and schedule is a proven method to avoiding surprises. We have implemented several project management tools to assist our project managers. Our accounting system provides up-to-date cost reports by task, which compares actual to budgeted costs. We have developed project scheduling templates using Microsoft Project, which track projects through completion. Our project schedules maintain a baseline schedule, so we can track the overall success of the schedule. The project schedule for completion of the project is included on the following page. All major outputs and meetings are included in the schedule. The schedule will be closely managed and monitored to ensure all necessary materials are completed by the date of the public hearing. This has been a proven approach and is expected to facilitate the successful completion of the project within the established 9-month timeframe.
Quality Assurance
We will utilize our established and recently updated quality control plan to ensure all deliverables are reviewed by senior staff with relevant experience to ensure the City receives quality deliverables. Karl Brustad will review all deliverables in advance of submitting to the City. We exclusively utilize Blue Beam Studio software to perform quality control reviews. This software will document all comments from senior staff including response from staff on how the comments were addressed. This allows for seamless backcheck by our reviewers to ensure the highest quality deliverables are submitted.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 19
E. Project Hours
Task No. Task Description
PIC | QA/QC
Karl
Brustad
Project
Manager 3:
Ashley
Smith
Project
Engineer I:
Laura
Hernandez
Staff Engineer
2: Hayden
Horan
Admin 2 Dudek HDR
Task 1 - Information and Data Collection
1.1 Information and Data Collection 2 6 12
Subtotal of Hours for Task 1: 0 2 6 12 0 0 0
Task 2 – 2016 Water Master Plan Review
2.1 2016 Water Master Plan Review 1 2 4
Subtotal of Hours for Task 2 0 1 2 4 0 0 0
Task 3 - Water System Description
3.1 Water System Description 2 4
Subtotal of Hours for Task 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 0
Task 4 - Water Demand Analysis and Characterization
4.1 Population Projections 1 4 8
4.2 Existing and Future Land-Use 1 6 12
4.3 Diurnal Curve Development 4 8 12 24
4.4 Demand by User Type 1 6 12
4.5 Buildout Demand 1 4 6
4.6 Water Loss Description 2 4 6
4.7 Peaking Factor Analysis 2 4 6 8
4.8 Demand Projections by Pressure Zone 1 4 8
Subtotal of Hours for Task 4 6 19 46 84 0 0 0
Task 5 - Hydraulic Model Update
5.1 Describe current hydraulic model 1 4 4
5.2 Describe modifications to existing water model 1 4 4
5.3 Verify operational set points 1 2 4
5.4 Add Infill and New Piping 1 4 8
5.5 Updated Demand Allocation 4 6 8
5.6 Model Calibration 6 12 16 32
Subtotal of Hours for Task 5 6 20 36 60 0 0 0
Task 6 - Water Distribution System Analysis
6.1 Water Distribution Analysis 1 4 8 12
6.2 Develop System Evaluation Criteria 2 4 4
6.3 Identify System Improvements 2 4 6 8
Subtotal of Hours for Task 6 3 10 18 24 0 0 0
Task 7 - Water Treatment Plan System Analysis
7.1 Data Review and Site Visit 34
7.2 Water Treatment Process Capacity Evaluation 76
7.3 Improvement Identification and Documentation 94 Subtotal of Hours for Task 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 204
Task 8 - Capital Improvement Program Development
8.1 Development of Capital Improvement Program 2 6 16 32 Subtotal of Hours for Task 8 2 6 16 32 0 0 0
Task 9 - Condition Assessment Program Development
9.1 Identify Assessment Technologies 4 16 8
9.2 Alternatives Analysis 2 6 16 12
9.3 Describe Required Infrastructure 6 12 16
9.4 Cost Benefit Analysis 2 6 12 24
9.5 Recommended approach 2 4 8 12
Subtotal of Hours for Task 9 6 26 64 72 0 0 0
Task 10 - CEQA Support
10.1 CEQA Compliance Kickoff 5
10.2 Project Description 27
10.3 AB 52 Support 13
10.4 Administrative Draft IS 92
10.5 Public Review IS/ND 50
10.6 Responses to Comments and Final IS/ND 56
10.7 City Council Adoption Support 32
10.8 Tribal Consultations (Optional Task) 22
Subtotal of Hours for Task 10 0 0 0 0 0 297 0
Task 11 - Draft Report
11.1 Development of Draft Report 8 24 32
Subtotal of Hours for Task 11 0 8 24 32 0 0 0
Task 12 - Final Report
12.1 Development of Final Report 4 12 16
Subtotal of Hours for Task 12 0 4 12 16 0 0 0
Task 13 - Supporting Documentation Provided to City
13.1 Source Document Export 1 2 4
Subtotal of Hours for Task 13 0 1 2 4 0 0 0
Task 14 - Project Management
14.1 General Project Management 18 9 15
14.2 Project Meetings 14 4 10
14.3 QA/QC 12
14.4 Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports 9 9
Subtotal of Hours for Task 14 12 41 13 0 9 0 25
TOTAL 35 144 248 340 9 297 229
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 20
D. Consultant and Sub-Consultant Staff
Verdantas has assembled a team that has the knowledge, experience and dedication to provide the City with the needed 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program Services. Our team was hand-picked to meet the specific needs of your project.
Ashley Smith, PE, will be the project manager for this project. She will be the City’s primary point of contact and will oversee all aspects of the project. We have selected Karl Brustad, PE, MBA to provide QA/QC. Our organization chart is shown below followed by the relevant experience of our project team.
Our proposed team is comprised of highly skilled professionals who have overseen projects for the City, and other water agencies, that align with the requested services.
Karl Brustad, PE, MBA | Principal-in-Charge | AVP
EDUCATION: MBA, California State University, Sacramento | BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico
LICENSES: CA – Civil Engineer - # 57869 | Grade IV Water Treatment Operator - #22526 TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: Water Infrastructure Planning, Design, and Operation. Water/Wastewater Master Planning
Karl Brustad has more than 30 years of experience in the planning, design, and construction of water and wastewater master plans, water supply, flood control systems, water distribution, wastewater collection, groundwater supply wells, water storage, water and wastewater pump stations, and water treatment systems. Karl has a deep, long-standing familiarity with the City of Folsom, having supported the City’s water and wastewater programs through master planning, on-call engineering, and capital delivery efforts over many years. He spent several years working for a water utility prior to entering the consulting field 25 years ago, where it gave him an understanding of the client’s perspective and expectations of consultants. He is intimately familiar with a variety of water and wastewater modeling applications.
Years of Industry
Experience: 30
Availability 20%
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 21
Ashley Smith, PE | Project Manager III
EDUCATION: BS Civil and Environmental Engineering; Minor in Sustainability in the Built Environment, University of California, Davis
LICENSES: CA – Civil Engineer - #86512 | Water Treatment Operator, Grade T2 - #42384 TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: Water Infrastructure Design and Planning, Water Master Planning, Hydraulic Modeling, Auto CAD/Civil 3D Design
Ashley has extensive experience leading and delivering water master planning efforts for public water agencies. She served as project engineer for the 2016 Water Master Plan Update for the City of Folsom, where she was responsible for data review and analysis, development of water demand projections, evaluation of demand management measures, population and demographic analysis, assessment of system supplies and water supply reliability, and water shortage contingency planning. Her role included updating and calibrating hydraulic models for existing, intermediate, and build-out conditions; evaluating the water system relative to current and future demands consistent with the 2015 UWMP; identifying system improvements; developing a 10-year Capital Improvement Program with cost estimates; and preparing draft and final master plan reports.
Laura Hernandez Uribe, PE | Project Engineer I
EDUCATION: MS, Engineering Sciences, University of the Pacific, CA. | BS Sciences University of the Pacific, CA - Specialization: Civil Engineering
LICENSES: : CA – Civil Engineer - #98220
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: Water Master Planning, Hydraulic Modeling Laura has worked on a variety of water infrastructure projects including water supply and treatment, water distribution, water storage, and pumping projects. She has experience in planning, modeling, designing, and permitting, as well as providing engineering services during construction for water resource projects. Laura is also proficient in InfoWater Pro, AutoCAD software.
Hayden Horan, EIT | Staff Engineer II
EDUCATION: BS Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, CA LICENSES: CA - Engineer-In-Training, No. 178955
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: Water Master Planning, Hydraulic Modeling Hayden joined Verdantas in 2023 and specializes in water distribution and metering infrastructure, water treatment, and pump station projects. He has experience modeling, design, cost estimating and construction support services for projects including wells, pipelines, water treatment facilities, and levees. He is proficient in ArcGIS, InfoWater Pro, and AutoCAD software.
Years of Industry
Experience: 12
Availability: 25%
Years of Industry
Experience: 9
Availability: 35%
Years of Industry
Experience: 2
Availability: 40%
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 22
Katherine Waugh | CEQA/NEPA Lead
EDUCATION: BS, Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning, University of California, Davis AFFILIATIONS: Association of Environmental Professionals TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: CEQA/NEPA
Katherine Waugh is a senior planner with 26 years’ experience with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutory requirements and environmental documentation procedures. She prepares CEQA documents for a wide range of public and private projects, managing projects effectively and maintaining momentum to meet schedule and budget requirements with attention to detail and a focus on quickly identifying and resolving critical issues. She has provided CEQA services on numerous WTP projects for water districts, cities, and municipalities throughout California.
Rich Stratton, PE | HDR Task Manager
EDUCATION: MS & BS Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign LICENSES: CA – Civil Engineer - #37261
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: Water Master Planning, Demand Forecasting, Hydraulic Modeling, Capital Improvement Planning
Rich brings 45 years of experience delivering water system planning, design, and implementation projects. His experience with WTP improvements includes tiered condition assessment of treatment processes, critical equipment, and pipelines; evaluation of treatment alternatives; and development of a phased, implementable roadmap for long-term redundancy and resilience. He offers a deep understanding of regional systems and leads complex master planning efforts that integrate demand forecasting, hydraulic modeling coordination, and capital improvement planning. His portfolio spans treatment facilities, pump stations, pipelines, and storage systems, with involvement in more than 90 water treatment projects as a project manager and senior technical advisor.
Arthur Xu, PE | HDR Project Engineer
EDUCATION: MS & BS Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis LICENSES: CA – Civil Engineer - # 92898
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES: Technical Analysis & System Evaluation, Hydraulic & Process Modeling Arthur has 10 years of experience in the water sector, supporting planning and design for municipal and regional water systems throughout Northern California. His work centers on technical analysis and system evaluation, with strengths in hydraulic and process modeling, condition assessment, and infrastructure planning. Specific areas of expertise include ActifloCARB pretreatment, dual-media filters, chemical systems, and solids handling improvements.
Years of Industry
Experience: 26
Availability: 30%
Years of Industry
Experience: 45
Availability: 25%
Years of Industry
Experience: 10
Availability: 30%
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 23
E. Consultant Qualifications and References
Previous Experience with Similar Projects
Our team has developed numerous water and wastewater master plans for our clients, which included condition assessments of existing facilities, development of hydraulic models for the evaluations of distribution and collection systems, identification of deficiencies, alternatives analysis and identification of recommended improvements used to support the development of capital improvement programs. Our team has supported water and wastewater master plans and hydraulic modeling for both large and small water Districts and municipalities including City of Folsom, City of Stockton, Calaveras County Water District, Fair Oaks Water District, El Dorado Irrigation District, Calaveras Public Utility District, Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District and Placer County Water Agency.
Below we have provided project examples and references for similar work. 2016 Water Master Plan Update & 2015 Urban Water Management Plan | City of Folsom
Client Contact: Marcus Yasutake, Director of Utilities
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630 | (916) 351-3528
Date of Completion: 2017
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager Provided evaluation of the water system relative to current and future water demands consistent with 2015 Urban Water Management Plan.
Provided data review and analysis, development of updated demand projections, analysis of demand management measures, system supplies, water supply reliability, water shortage contingency planning, and climate change.
Updated hydraulic models for existing, intermediate, and build out scenarios. Identified system improvements and prepared cost estimates and a 10-year Capital Improvement Program. 2023 Recycled Water Master Plan Update and Hydraulic Model | City of Folsom
Client Contact: Marcus Yasutake, Director of Utilities
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630 | (916) 351-3528
Date of Completion: 2023
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager The City expanded its service area to allow for future development projects in the areas south of Highway 50. As the City prepared for significant growth, focus was put on particular areas south of Highway 50. The major planned developments south of Highway 50 included the Easton Project and the Folsom Plan Area (FPA).
Verdantas updated the 2015 Folsom Plan Area (FPA) Non-Potable Water Analysis 2.0 (2015 Analysis) in conjunction with development of a hydraulic model for the non-potable water distribution system. The Plan included evaluation and sizing for existing infrastructure and planned backbone infrastructure.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 24
Folsom Plan Area (FPA) On-Call Modeling Support |
City of Folsom
Client Contact: Vaughn Fleischbein, PE, Senior Engineer 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630 | (916) 461-6165
Date of Completion: 2018 – Ongoing
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager; Laura Hernandez Uribe, Project Engineer
Provided on-c all hydraulic modeling support for the City of Folsom in support of development review within the Folsom Plan Area (FPA).
Integrated planned South of Highway 50 FPA developments and existing developments into the City’s hydraulic model.
Redistributed system demands by land
-us
e type to reflect current and future residential and commercial development within the FPA.
Performed hydraulic model runs to confirm acceptable importation of new infrastructure associated with proposed FPA developments.
Developed intermediate condition models to simulate temporary operating scenarios prior to construction of planned facilities.
Incorporated developer-pr
ovided data to evaluate both current and ultimate build -o
ut demand conditions
within the South of Highway 50 planning area.
Evaluated potential impacts of FPA development on existing infrastructure north of Highway 50 using updated hydraulic modeling scenarios.
Supported the City’s ongoing development review process through continued updates and maintenance of the FPA hydraulic model.
Tank & Cathodic Protection Inspections | City of Folsom Client Contact: Vaughn Fleischbein, PE, Senior Engineer 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630 | (916) 461-6165
Date of Completion: 2023 – Ongoing
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager; Laura Hernandez Uribe, Project Engineer
Performed water storage tank inspections as part of the City’s ongoing Tank Master Plan, Inspection, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation Program.
Conducted condition assessments of welded steel water storage reservoirs, including evaluation of overall tank condition to support maintenance and rehabilitation planning.
Inspected interior and exterior coating systems, documenting observed deficiencies related to corrosion, safety, and long
-te
rm performance.
Evaluated existing cathodic protection (CP) systems associated with City water storage tanks to assess effectiveness and condition.
Documented inspection findings and deficiencies for use in rehabilitation planning and prioritization of tank repairs, recoating, and CP improvements.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 25
2025 Water Master Plan and Hydraulic Model Update|
Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District
Client Contact: Erik Christeson, General Manager
33540 Loop Road Kirkwood, CA 95646 | (209) 258-4444
Date of Completion: 2025 – Ongoing
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager; Laura Hernandez Uribe, Project Engineer
Verdantas is currently developing the original water master plan that includes a detailed 20+ year capital improvement plan (CIP) used to support financial planning and ensure adequate funding for future improvements.
A hydraulic model was developed using InfoWater Pro to analyze different water supply and demand scenarios throughout the distribution system.
The Master Plan included an evaluation of the water system’s water supply, water demands, water treatment facilities, transmission system, distribution system, and storage facilities. The updated WMP will evaluate the materials, ages, and conditions of the existing infrastructure and provide recommendations to assist the District with updates to the risk and resilience assessment and emergency response planning.
Included the preparation of capital facilities improvements, which included estimated costs and an implementation schedule for a 5-year CIP and a 20-year Asset Management Program.
2023 Water Master Plan Update and 2008 Water Master Plan | Calaveras Public Utility District (CPUD)
Client Contact: Mathew Roberts, Interim General Manager 506 West Saint Charles Street, San Andreas, CA 95249 |
(209) 754-9442
Date of Completion: 2023
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager Verdantas developed the original water master plan that included a detailed 20+ year capital improvement plan (CIP) used to support financial planning and ensure adequate funding for future improvements. A hydraulic model was developed using InfoWater Pro to analyze different water supply and demand scenarios throughout the distribution system representing approximately 3,000 rural customers in mountainous terrain. The Master Plan included an evaluation of the water system’s water supply, water demands, water treatment facilities, transmission system, distribution system, and storage facilities. Verdantas prepared an update to the WMP to evaluate the capacity of the existing water system to meet existing and future water demands including fire flow capabilities. The updated WMP evaluated the materials, ages, and conditions of the existing infrastructure and provided recommendations to assist the District with updates to the risk and resilience assessment and emergency response planning.
Included the preparation of capital facilities improvements including estimated costs and implementation schedule for a 5-year CIP and a 20-year Asset Management Program.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 26
On-Call Modeling Support | Fair Oaks Water District (FOWD) Client Contact: Paul Siebensohn, Water Supply Superintendent 10326 Fair Oaks Blvd, Fair Oaks, CA 95628 | (916) 967‑5723 Date of Completion: 2015 – Ongoing
Verdantas Team Members: Karl Brustad, PIC; Ashley Smith, Project Manager Reviewed background system information to develop an understanding of overall District water system operations.
Identified and evaluated control settings to confirm consistency with documented system operations.
Verified hydraulic model calibration using pre-dr
ought fire flow test data provided by FOWD.
Updated system demands and allocated demand by land use using Sacramento County land -us
e data and
demand factors.
Verified model results against available field fire flow data to confirm accuracy of updated model conditions. Prepared technical memoranda documenting model verification, updated demands, results, and findings. Provided recommendations for ongoing maintenance and management of the District’s hydraulic model. Coordinated modeling activities with Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) updates and related planning efforts.
City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Backwash & Recycled Water Capacity Improvements (HDR) | City of Folsom
Client Contact: Kelsie Gugino, Associate Civil Engineer 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630 | (916) 461-6166
Date of Completion: 2021 – 2025
HDR Team Members: Rich Stratton, Project Manager
HDR provided design, CEQA categorical exemption documentation, and bidding phase services for targeted improvements to the decant pump station and reclamation backwash basin at the water treatment plant to enhance operational reliability, improve backwash water recycling efficiency, and increase system flexibility within the existing footprint. Improvements included installation of three new submersible decant pumps (two duty, one standby) with variable frequency drives providing a peak capacity of approximately 5 million gallons per day, implementation of a new automated control system to maintain a staff-specified discharge rate and eliminate manual throttling, replacement of aging and leaking slide gates at the wet well to improve isolation and reduce water loss, and modifications to the backwash basin piping to allow flow to either basin via new isolation valves, improving redundancy and operational flexibility. The project qualified for a CEQA exemption under the Existing Facilities exemption (Section 15301[b]) as it did not expand treatment capacity but significantly improved the performance, resilience, and long-term optimization of existing infrastructure in support of capital improvement and water reuse goals.
City of Santa Cruz Graham Hill Water Treatment Plan Facilities Plan Update (HDR) | City of Santa Cruz
Client Contact: Matt Zeman, Engineering Associate
212 Locust Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | (831) 420‑5030 Date of Completion: 2017 – 2020
HDR Team Members: Rich Stratton, Project Manager
As part of the City of Santa Cruz’s commitment to long-term water system reliability and regulatory readiness, HDR led a Facilities Plan Update for the 20-MGD Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant to identify and prioritize capital
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com 27
improvements addressing aging infrastructure, evolving water quality requirements, and climate-driven risks such as drought, wildfire, and seismic events. The effort included a tiered condition assessment of critical treatment, mechanical, electrical, and pipeline assets, combining Tier 1 visual inspections and staff input with Tier 2 advanced diagnostics such as thermography, vibration analysis, and ultrasonic testing. HDR also evaluated treatment and supply alternatives, including pilot testing of advanced technologies, a Distribution System Water Age Assessment, and feasibility analysis of a potential second treatment facility at the Hanson Quarry site to provide added capacity and redundancy. The resulting phased capital improvement roadmap aligns with the City’s operational priorities and regulatory obligations, providing a clear, actionable path to modernize the GHWTP and ensure a resilient, reliable water supply.
Placer County Water Agency Foothill Water Treatment Plan Phasing Study (HDR) | Placer County Water Agency
Client Contact: Heather Knutson, PE, Engineering Services Manager 144 Ferguson Road, Auburn, CA 95603 | (530) 823-4951
Date of Completion: 2024 – 2025
HDR Team Members: Rich Stratton, Project Manager
HDR developed a five-year phasing plan to address critical infrastructure needs at the 63 MGD Foothill Water Treatment Plant (WTP), supporting long-term system reliability, regulatory compliance, and capital planning. The plan is based on visual inspections of accessible infrastructure and equipment, operational input, and performance data, and provides a prioritized roadmap for targeted improvements.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Firm
Verdantas
Office Location
Folsom, CA
Education
MBA, California State University,
Sacramento
BS, Civil Engineering, California
State University, Chico
Licenses/Certifications
CA – Professional Engineer -
#57869
Grade 4 Water Treatment
Operator, CA No. 22526
Certificate of Advanced Business
Studies; CA State University,
Sacramento
Years of Experience
30 Years of Industry Experience
Verdantas.com
Karl Brustad, PE, MBA
Associate Vice President/Market Sector Leader
for the West - Water
Karl Brustad has more than 30 years of experience in the planning, design, and construction of water supply, water distribution, water storage, and water treatment systems. His experience includes groundwater and surface water treatment, storage tanks, pumping stations, pipeline distribution and conveyance, wells, master planning, flood control, telemetry, and SCADA. He is intimately familiar with a variety of water and wastewater modeling applications.
Project Experience
2016 Water Master Plan Update and Urban Water Management Plan – City of Folsom
Folsom, CA | 2015 – 2017
Verdantas provided data review and analysis, development of demand projections, analysis of demand management measures, population and demographic analysis, system supplies, water supply reliability, water shortage contingency planning, climate change, and other factors. Updated hydraulic models for existing, intermediate, and build-out scenarios. Evaluated the water system relative to current and future water demands consistent with 2015 Urban Water Management Plan and identified system improvements. Developed 10- year Capital Improvement Program including cost estimates. Prepared draft and final reports.
Recycled Water Master Plan Update and Hydraulic Model – City of Folsom
Folsom, CA | 2020 – 2024
Integrating planned South of Highway 50 FPA and existing developments into the City’s hydraulic model and redistributing demand data to new development by land type. The model runs tests to confirm acceptable importation of new infrastructure. An intermediate model was developed to simulate temporary operation conditions prior to the planned improvements being constructed.
On-Call Modeling Support Services
City of Folsom, California
Provide on-call modeling support services to assess proposed developments and provide theoretical fire flow test results in support of developer requests in lieu of the City having to perform field tests.
2020 and 2015 Urban Water Management Plan- Fair Oaks Water District
Fair Oaks, CA | 2016 & 2021
Verdantas completed the 2015 and 2020 UWMP for the Fair Oaks Water District.
Provided analysis for the current system and its efficiency and designing a master plan that would be capable of satisfying the demand from the system. Evaluated all aspects of the UWMP sections including water supply and demand for existing and future build-out scenarios, water shortage contingency planning, system supplies, and other factors.
F. Team Resumes
28 Page 92
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Firm
Verdantas
Office Location
Folsom, CA
Education
B.S. Civil and Environmental
Engineering with Minor in
Sustainability in the Built
Environment, UC Davis
Licenses/Certifications
Registered Professional Civil
Engineer California No. 86512
Water Treatment Operator,
Grade T2 No. 42384
Years of Experience
14 Years of Industry Experience
12 Years at Verdantas
Verdantas.com
Ashley Smith, PE
Senior Project Manager
Ashley has over 14 years of experience in water and water resources projects. She has extensive planning experience in water system master plans, capital improvement plans, and cost estimating. She has been the responsible project manager for dozens of water infrastructure projects since she joined Verdantas in 2014.
Project Experience
2016 Water Master Plan Update and 2015 Urban Water Management Plan – City of Folsom
Folsom, CA | 2015 – 2017
Ashley served as the project engineer responsible for data review, demand projections, and analysis of management measures, demographics, supplies, and system reliability. Updated hydraulic models for various scenarios and assessed water systems according to 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, recommending improvements. Developed a 10-year Capital Improvement Program with cost estimates and prepared reports.
Water Master Plan – Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District Kirkwood, CA. 2024 – 2025
Verdantas developed the District’s first integrated Water Master Plan to identify and prioritize improvements to water treatment, storage, and distribution systems and support growth. Hydraulic modeling was performed using InfoWater Pro. Ashley was the project manager.
2023 Water Master Plan Update and 2008 Water Master Plan – Calaveras Public Utility District (CPUD)
San Andreas, CA | 2023 – 2024
Verdantas prepared the original water master plan with a 20+ year capital improvement plan (CIP). Using InfoWater Pro, they modeled scenarios to assess supply and demand for about 3,000 rural customers, evaluating all major system components. The update will review capacity, infrastructure condition, and offer recommendations, costs, and schedules for a 5-year CIP and 20-year Asset Management Program. Ashley served as project manager.
Recycled Water Master Plan Update and Hydraulic Model – City of Folsom
Folsom, CA | 2020 – 2024
The City has expanded its service area south of Highway 50 to include the Easton Project and Folsom Plan Area. Verdantas is updating the 2015 Non-Potable Water Analysis, creating a hydraulic model, and assessing infrastructure. Ashley managed the project.
29Page 93
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Firm
Verdantas
Office Location
Folsom, CA
Education
Master’s in Engineering
Sciences, University of the
Pacific, CA.
B.S. Civil Engineering,
University of the Pacific, CA.
Licenses/Certifications
CA – Professional Engineer
No. 98220
Years of Experience
9 Years of Industry Experience
2 Years at Verdantas
Laura Hernandez, PE
Project Engineer
Verdantas.com
Water infrastructure design engineer supporting treatment, distribution, storage, and pumping projects. Experience includes planning, hydraulic modeling, design, and rehabilitation of wells, pipelines, storage, and treatment facilities. Proficient in InfoWater Pro and AutoCAD.
Project Experience
2023 Water Master Plan Update – Calaveras Public Utility District San Andreas, CA | 2023 – 2024
Supported the update of the hydraulic model, evaluated system capacity, fire flows, and long-term infrastructure needs; supported 5-year CIP and 20- year asset management planning.
On-Call Modeling Support Services – City of Folsom
Folsom, CA | 2019 – Ongoing
Conducted fire hydrant and distribution system analyses to support the City’s South of Highway 50 planning. Modeled fire-flow scenarios and utilized NFPA 291 extrapolation to determine available flow at 20 psi.
Sunset Boulevard Main Replacement Project – Placer County Water District (PCWA)
Rocklin, CA | 2023 – Ongoing
Design support of 2,800 LF of water main for Placer County Water Agency, co-authoring the preliminary design report, evaluating alignment and material options, and assisting with design and cost estimation.
Transmission Main Replacement Project – Fair Oaks Water District Fair Oaks, CA | 2024-2025
Design support for approximately 3,400 LF of 24” transmission water main.
Water Master Plan – Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District Kirkwood, CA | 2024-2025
Assisted with updating the hydraulic model, assessed system capacity, fire flows, and infrastructure needs; contributed to 5-year CIP and 20-year asset management planning.
30Page 94
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Firm
Verdantas
Office Location
Folsom, CA
Education
B.S. Civil Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento,
CA
Licenses/Certifications
CA - Engineer-In-Training, No.
178955
Years of Experience
4 Years of Industry Experience
2 Years at Verdantas
Hayden Horan, EIT
Staff Engineer
Verdantas.com
Hayden specializes in water infrastructure, water treatment, and pump station projects. He has experience modeling, designing, cost estimating, and restoring water resources including wells, pipelines, water treatment facilities, and levees. He is proficient in ArcGIS, AutoCAD, and InfoWater software.
Project Experience
2023 Water Master Plan Update – Calaveras Public Utility District San Andreas, CA | 2023 – Ongoing
Updated hydraulic model for approximately 3,000 connections; evaluated system capacity, fire flows, and long-term infrastructure needs; supported 5-year CIP and 20-year asset management planning.
Copper Cove Water System Improvements – Calaveras County Water District (CCWD)
San Andreas, CA | 2022 – Ongoing
Design and construction support for Clearwell’s, steel tanks with cathodic protection, booster pump stations, control building, and 20-inch transmission main.
Fruitridge Vista Water System 2020 Priority Main Replacement Project – Cal Am
Sacramento, CA | 2020 – Ongoing
Design and construction support for approximately 13,500 LF of front-yard mains, services, and meters; supported DDW variances and field coordination.
Dudley Main Replacement Project – Sacramento Suburban Water District (SSWD)
Sacramento, CA | 2024 – Ongoing
Design of two pipeline segments including approximately 3,450 LF of 16- inch ductile iron pipe and 6,000 LF of 20-inch ductile iron pipe; included cathodic protection, PDR, permitting, and bid assistance.
Irrigation System Renovation Plan Phase 1 – Hallwood Irrigation Company (HIC)
Marysville, CA | 2022 – Ongoing
Condition assessment, deficiency identification, design assistance for approximately 7,700 LF of 42-inch HDPE pipeline, and support for grant research and phased improvement planning.
31Page 95
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Santa Cruz, Graham Hill Water Treatment
Plant Facility Improvements Plan, Santa Cruz, CA
Rich was the project manager for the Graham
Hill WTP Facilities Improvements Plan to provide
upgrades to reliably produce 20‑MGD capacity,
including a tiered condition assessment of
treatment processes, critical equipment, and
pipelines; evaluation of treatment alternatives and
a potential second plant; and development of a
phased, implementable roadmap for long‑term
redundancy and resilience.
Placer County Water Agency, Foothill Water
Treatment Capacity Expansions and Phasing Plan,
Newcastle, CA
Rich served as project manager for final design,
bidding, and construction engineering services for
WTP capacity expansions, increasing total plant
capacity from 58 MGD to 63 MGD. Improvements
included Plant No. 1 upgrades, Plant No. 2 expansion
with new tube settlers and filter media, controls
and SCADA updates, and a phased improvement
plan with cost and schedule roadmap to ensure
long‑term reliability and redundancy.
Coastside County Water District, Nunes Water
Treatment Plant Upgrades, Half Moon Bay, CA
As the project manager, Rich provided predesign
and design of upgrades to the Nunes WTP ,
including filter rehabilitation, replacement of flow
meters, new filter‑to‑waste piping and pumping,
chemical system upgrades, and electrical and I&C
improvements. The project also evaluated adding
a new 1‑MGD sedimentation basin to provide
redundant capacity.
City of Folsom, Water Treatment Plant - Various
Improvements Projects, Folsom, CA
Rich was the project manager or the technical
lead for various improvements projects at the
Rich Stratton, PE
Project Manager
Rich brings 45 years of experience delivering water system planning, design, and implementation projects, including more than three decades with HDR. Working from the Folsom office, he offers a deep understanding of regional systems and leads complex master planning efforts that integrate demand forecasting, hydraulic modeling coordination, and capital improvement planning. His portfolio spans treatment facilities, pump stations, pipelines, and storage systems, with involvement in more than 90 water treatment projects as a project manager and senior technical advisor. Known for providing clear direction and practical solutions, Rich focuses on developing implementable strategies that enhance system reliability and support long‑t erm performance. Rich is fully available and will remain engaged, providing responsive leadership and hands‑o n technical oversight throughout project delivery.
EDUCATION
Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, University of Illinois,
Urbana‑C hampaign
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, University of Illinois,
Urbana‑C hampaign
REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer ‑ Ci vil,
California, US, No. C‑3 7261
INDUSTRY TENURE
45 years
HDR TENURE
30 years
WTP including owner’s representative engineering
services for design‑b uild alternative delivery
procurement of a new mechanical dewatering
system; design of new dry feed polymer system
for the Actiflo system; and pump and piping
improvements to the RBW system to allow for
basins to be taken out of service for maintenance.
San Jose Water Company, Montevina Water
Treatment Plant Improvements Progressive Design-
Build, San Jose, CA
As the design manager, Rich was responsible
for converting a 30‑MGD WTP from direct
filtration to polymeric membrane filtration,
including structural rehabilitation, pretreatment,
disinfection, solids thickening and dewatering,
and future fluoridation facilities. The project
incorporated innovative, cost‑effective solutions
such as hydraulic flocculation, energy‑efficient flash
mixing, repurposing existing filters and clearwells,
advanced solids handling, and nanofiltration of CIP
waste to minimize offsite disposal.
Nevada Irrigation District, Lake Wildwood Water
Treatment Plant Capacity Study and Master Plan,
Grass Valley, CA
Rich conducted a capacity and alternatives study
for the Lake Wildwood WTP , evaluating demand,
water quality, and facility condition to assess plant
improvements, expansion options, and a potential
pipeline, culminating in a system master plan with
prioritized recommendations.
Coastside County Water District, Denniston Water
Treatment Plant Treatability Study, Half Moon Bay,
CA
Rich supported a treatability study to convert the
1.5‑MGD Denniston WTP from direct filtration
to conventional treatment, addressing seasonal
turbidity spikes exceeding 50 NTU and Bin 2
Cryptosporidium requirements.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
32Page 96
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
West Hills Water Treatment Plan Expansion,
Hollister, CA
As project manager, Arthur was responsible for
expanding a 4.5‑MGD WTP to 6.75 MGD, including
new raw water pumps, ActifloCARB pretreatment,
dual‑media filters, chemical systems, and solids
handling improvements. The design included
detailed source water quality analysis to address
elevated iron, manganese, and TOC.
Placer County Water Agency, Colfax Water
Treatment Plant Replacement, Colfax, CA
Arthur was the design manager for a 2‑MGD
greenfield WTP replacing the Colfax plant, including
pretreatment, filtration, clearwells, chemical
systems, residuals handling, pumping systems, and
a pre‑engineered metal building.
Nevada Irrigation District, Lake Wildwood Water
Treatment Plant Replacement Alternatives, Grass
Valley, CA
Arthur served as project manager for the full
replacement of the 4‑MGD Lake Wildwood WTP ,
evaluating conventional, packaged, and alternative
treatment technologies.
Coastside County Water District, Nunes Water
Treatment Plant Upgrades, Half Moon Bay, CA
Arthur was the project manager for upgrades to
the 4.5‑MGD Nunes WTP , including rehabilitation
of conventional filters, a new plate settler basin for
redundancy, chemical addition improvements, valve
replacements, and rehabilitation of filter, clearwell,
and sedimentation basin structures.
Coastside County Water District, Denniston Water
Treatment Plant Treatability Study, Half Moon Bay,
CA
Arthur’s role as project manager involved a
treatability study converting the 1.5‑MGD Denniston
WTP from direct filtration to conventional
Arthur Xu, PE
Project Engineer
Arthur has 10 years of experience in the water sector, supporting planning and design for municipal and regional water systems throughout Northern California. His work centers on technical analysis and system evaluation, with strengths in hydraulic and process modeling, condition assessment, and infrastructure planning. He has prepared feasibility studies, developed demand projections, and contributed to the design of treatment, pumping, and conveyance facilities, helping translate data into practical, cost‑e ffective solutions. Arthur also brings experience with advanced tools such as CFD modeling and flow optimization, which reinforce his ability to evaluate system performance and identify targeted improvements. His analytical approach supports well‑i nformed decisions and efficient project implementation.
EDUCATION
Master of Science, Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
University of California, Davis
Bachelor of Science, Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
University of California, Davis
REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer, Civil, CA, No.
92898
INDUSTRY TENURE
10 years
HDR TENURE
10 years
treatment, addressing seasonal turbidity spikes over
50 NTU and Bin 2 Cryptosporidium requirements.
City of Vallejo, Travis Air Force Base Water
Treatment Plant Study, Vallejo, CA
Arthur was the project engineer evaluating
rehabilitation versus replacement of a 6‑MGD WTP ,
including analysis of treatment alternatives such as
pre‑ozonation, Actiflo, plate settlers, intermediate
ozonation, and GAC filtration.
City of Vallejo, Lakes Water System Water Supply
Alternatives Analysis, Vallejo, CA
As the project engineer, Arthur evaluated
alternatives to increase the City’s Lakes Water
System supply by 1 MGD, including treatment
options such as GAC filtration, ActifloCARB, and
ion exchange, as well as non‑treatment alternatives
involving pumping, storage, and distribution system
improvements.
San Jose Water Company, McLaughlin Station
Fluoridation System, San Jose, CA
Arthur was the project engineer for the design,
permitting, and construction management for the
addition of a fluoridation system (bulk storage in
building, chemical feed and dilution, and controls)
at the 9‑MGD (average) and 17 ‑MGD (peak)
McLaughlin Wellfield Station.
San Jose Water Company, Montevina Water
Treatment Plant Improvements Progressive Design-
Build, San Jose, CA
Arthur provided technical support for progressive
design‑build conversion of an existing 30‑MGD
WTP from direct filtration to membrane treatment,
including structural rehabilitation, pretreatment,
disinfection, residuals handling, dewatering, and
future fluoridation facilities.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
33Page 97
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Katherine Waugh
Katherine Waugh is a senior planner with 26 years’ experience with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutory requirements and environmental documentation procedures. She prepares CEQA documents for a wide range of public and private projects, managing projects effectively and maintaining momentum to meet schedule and budget requirements with attention to detail and a focus on quickly identifying and resolving critical issues.
Project Experience
Sun Valley Watershed Management Plan CEQA Services, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, California. Project manager for CEQA and CEQA- Plus analysis of the County’s implementation of two projects identified in the 2004 Sun Valley Stormwater Management Plan. One would convert a former gravel mine site into a wetlands park, which would provide stormwater detention and treatment, conveyance of the treated stormwater to existing groundwater infiltration basins, and approximately 15 acres of recreational amenities. The other project would construct a storm drain system to collect and convey stormwater to the wetlands park. There is no storm drain system in this area currently, which leads to significant roadway flooding during even low- rain events. Critical project issues included air quality and noise impacts during construction.
West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant, Tahoe City Public Utility District, Placer County, California.
Project manager for the preparation of an IS/MND and CEQA-Plus analysis evaluating Tahoe City Public Utility District’s replacement of an Interim Surface Water Treatment Plant with a permanent facility involving construction immediately adjacent to Lake Tahoe as well as residential uses, and pipeline installation along State Route 89. Critical project issues included light and noise impacts to adjacent residents and potential impacts to special-status plants and wildlife.
Delta Dams Rodent Burrow Remediation, Department of Water Resources, Contra Costa and Solano Counties, California. Project manager for the preparation of an IS/MND evaluating the California Department of Water Resource’s program to remediate rodent burrows at three earthen dams. Critical project issues included potential presence of special-status plants and wildlife and impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources.
Floriston Water Treatment Plant Upgrade, Floriston Property Owner’s Association Nevada County, California.
Project manager for the preparation of an IS/MND and CEQA-Plus analysis evaluating upgrades to the existing water treatment plant to comply with state drinking water standards. Critical project issues included potential aesthetic impacts associated with the placement of a water storage tank on a bluff overlooking Interstate 80, impacts to and removal of trees, and vibration impacts to potentially historic structures.
Lake Forest Water Improvement District, Placer County, California. CEQA analyst for a Tahoe City Public Utility District project to acquire the Lake Forest Water Improvement District and replace water service lines to affected residents.
Education
University of California,
Davis
BS, Environmental Policy
Analysis and Planning,
1997
Professional Affiliations
Association of
Environmental
Professionals
34Page 98
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program Verdantas.com 35
G. Consultant Rate Schedule
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program Verdantas.com 36
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
January to December 2026
City of Folsom
Water Systems Master Plan
$375 to $425
$350 to $425
$300 to $350
$250 to $300
Principal-in-Charge
Project Manager 4
Project Manager 3
Project Manager 2
Project Manager 1 $225 to $250
$275 to $325
$225 to $275
$175 to $225
Engineer 4
Engineer 3
Engineer 2
Engineer 1 $125 to $175
$375 to $425
$325 to $375
$275 to $325
$225 to $275
$225 to $275
$175 to $225
$125 to $175
$150 to $225
Technical Specialist 4
Technical Specialist 3
Technical Specialist 2
Technical Specialist 1
CAD Technician 3
CAD Technician 2
CAD Technician 1
Project Controller
Project Coordinator $150 to $200
HDR will invoice the City by HDR’s employee hourly billing rate for services provided. The billing rates cover payroll cost, employee benefits, and HDR overhead and profit. The ranges of hourly billing rates shown are intended to illustrate typical rates for each billing category. HDR rates will escalate rates each calendar year on January 1, by 4.5%.
EXPENSES
In-House Expenses
Vehicle Mileage (per mile)
Ground Transportation (includes Rental Car, Uber, and Train) Postage/Overnight Mail
Copies (black and white)
Copies (color)
Bond Plotting (black and white)
Bond Plotting – (color)
Current Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)
at cost
at cost
at cost
at cost
at cost
at cost
Please Note:Expenses and subconsultants are charged with a five percent markup.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com
Appendix A.
Sample Agreement Modifications
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom | Consulting Services for the 2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment Program
Verdantas.com
Sample Agreement Modifications
Verdantas Inc. would like to submit the following modifications to Section XII. Indemnification, presented within the City’s Sample Agreement.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Attachment 3
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Consulting Services for the
2026 Water Master Plan and
Condition Assessment Program
Submitted to Submitted by
PROPOSAL FEE
Proposal to Provide
April 16, 2026
80 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 280
Folsom, CA 95630
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
City of Folsom
2026 Water Master Plan and Condition Assessment
Estimated Work Effort and Cost
Verdantas, Inc.
Task No. Task Description Principal in Charge & QA/QCProject Manager 3Project Engineer 1Staff Engineer 2Administrative 2Verdantas LaborTotal Verdantas Labor ($)Dudek (CEQA Services)HDR (Water Treatment Analysis)
Total Cost ($)
2026 Rates 290.00$ 270.00$ 200.00$ 177.00$ 110.00$ Task 1 - Information and Data Collection
1.1 Information and Data Collection 2 6 12 20 $3,864 $3,864 Subtotal Task 1 0 2 6 12 0 20 $3,864 $0 $0 $3,864
Task 2 - 2016 Water Master Plan Review
2.1 2016 Water Master Plan Review 1 2 4 7 $1,378 $1,378 Subtotal Task 2 0 1 2 4 0 7 $1,378 $0 $0 $1,378
Task 3 - Water System Description
3.1 Water System Description 2 4 6 $1,340 $1,340
Subtotal Task 3 0 2 4 0 0 6 $1,340 $0 $0 $1,340
Task 4 - Water Demand Analysis and Characterization
4.1 Population Projections 1 4 8 13 $2,486 $2,486
4.2 Existing and Future Land-Use 1 6 12 19 $3,594 $3,594
4.3 Diurnal Curve Development 4 8 12 24 48 $9,968 $9,968
4.4 Demand by User Type 1 6 12 19 $3,594 $3,594
4.5 Buildout Demand 1 4 6 11 $2,132 $2,132
4.6 Water Loss Description 2 4 6 12 $2,402 $2,402
4.7 Peaking Factor Analysis 2 4 6 8 20 $4,276 $4,276
4.8 Demand Projections by Pressure Zone 1 4 8 13 $2,486 $2,486 Subtotal Task 4 6 19 46 84 0 155 $30,938 $0 $0 $30,938
Task 5 - Hydraulic Model Update
5.1 Describe current hydraulic model 1 4 4 9 $1,778 $1,778
5.2 Describe modifications to existing water model 1 4 4 9 $1,778 $1,778
5.3 Verify operational set points 1 2 4 7 $1,378 $1,378
5.4 Add Infill and New Piping 1 4 8 13 $2,486 $2,486
5.5 Updated Demand Allocation 4 6 8 18 $3,696 $3,696
5.6 Model Calibration 6 12 16 32 66 $13,844 $13,844
Subtotal Task 5 6 20 36 60 0 122 $24,960 $0 $0 $24,960
Task 6 - Water Distribution System Analysis
6.1 Water Distribution Analysis 1 4 8 12 25 $5,094 $5,094
6.2 Develop System Evaluation Criteria 2 4 4 10 $2,048 $2,048
6.3 Identify System Improvements 2 4 6 8 20 $4,276 $4,276 Subtotal Task 6 3 10 18 24 0 55 $11,418 $0 $0 $11,418
Task 7 - Water Treatment Plan System Analysis
7.1 Data Review and Site Visit 0 $0 $9,942 $9,942
7.2 Water Treatment Process Capacity Evaluation 0 $0 $21,232 $21,232
7.3 Improvement Identification and Documentation 0 $0 $25,747 $25,747 Subtotal Task 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $56,921 $56,921
Task 8 - Capital Improvement Program Development
8.1 Development of Capital Improvement Program 2 6 16 32 56 $11,064 $11,064 Subtotal Task 8 2 6 16 32 0 56 $11,064 $0 $0 $11,064
Task 9 - Condition Assessment Program Development
9.1 Identify Assessment Technologies 4 16 8 28 $5,696 $5,696
9.2 Alternatives Analysis 2 6 16 12 36 $7,524 $7,524
9.3 Describe Required Infrastructure 6 12 16 34 $6,852 $6,852
9.4 Cost Benefit Analysis 2 6 12 24 44 $8,848 $8,848
9.5 Recommended approach 2 4 8 12 26 $5,384 $5,384
Subtotal Task 9 6 26 64 72 0 168 $34,304 $0 $0 $34,304
Task 10 - CEQA Support
10.1 CEQA Compliance Kickoff 0 $0 $1,320 $1,320
10.2 Project Description 0 $0 $4,697 $4,697
10.3 AB 52 Support 0 $0 $4,571 $4,571
10.4 Admin Draft IS 0 $0 $15,739 $15,739
10.5 Public Review IS/ND 0 $0 $8,656 $8,656
10.6 Responses to Comments and Final IS/ND 0 $0 $10,309 $10,309
10.7 City Council Adoption Support 0 $0 $6,001 $6,001
10.8 Tribal Consultations (Optional Task) 0 $0 $4,191 $4,191 Subtotal Task 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $55,483 $0 $55,483
Task 11 - Draft Report
11.1 Development of Draft Report 8 24 32 64 $12,624 $12,624 Subtotal Task 11 0 8 24 32 0 64 $12,624 $0 $0 $12,624
Task 12 - Final Report
12.1 Development of Final Report 4 12 16 32 $6,312 $6,312 Subtotal Task 12 0 4 12 16 0 32 $6,312 $0 $0 $6,312
Task 13 - Supporting Documentation Provided to City
13.1 Source Document Export 1 2 4 7 $1,378 $1,378
Subtotal Task 13 0 1 2 4 0 7 $1,378 $0 $0 $1,378
Task 14 - Project Management
14.1 General Project Management 18 9 27 $6,660 $3,054 $9,714
14.2 Project Meetings 18 9 27 $6,660 $3,939 $10,599
14.3 QA/QC 12 12 $3,480 $3,480
14.4 Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports 9 9 18 $3,420 $3,420 Subtotal Task 14 12 45 18 0 9 84 $20,220 $0 $6,992 $27,212 COLUMN TOTALS 35 144 248 340 9 776 $159,800 $55,483 $63,913 $279,196 $275,005
$279,196
TOTAL COST WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKSPage 105
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.
06/09/2026 Item No.6.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
1 MEETING DATE:
6/9/2026
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Calendar
ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 11641 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a One-Year Extension to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-046) with Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC for an Estimated Cost of $288,000 from the Solid Waste Operating Fund (Fund 540) for Processing and Diversion of Commercial Recyclables
FROM: Utilities Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Utilities Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11641 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a One -Year Extension to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-046) with Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC for an Estimated Cost of $288,000 from the Solid Waste Operating Fund (Fund 540) for Processing and Diversion of Commercial Recyclables.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On April 14, 2020 the Folsom City Council adopted Resolution No. 10403 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Recycling Industries, Inc. for the purchase, processing, and diversion of recyclables collected from businesses. In 2024 the Recycling Industries (RI) facility utilized under this contract was purchased by Allied Waste Services of North America, L LC (Republic) and an assignment agreement was executed.
The City’s commercial recycling program was first established in 2002 to help meet the waste diversion requirements of California’s Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). The program expanded in 2012 to help businesses meet regulations established by California’s Mandatory Commercial Recycling Law (AB 341). Additional requirements were imposed by California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy (SB 1383) and now jurisdictions must provide recycling services to all businesses for specific recyclables such as cardboard, paper,
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
2 and plastic and metal containers, and businesses are prohibited from using trash containers to dispose of these items.
The Waste and Recycling Division provides the mandated collection of commercial recyclables from businesses; however, the program relies on the processing and marketing services of a private facility for compliance.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $77,426 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
The current agreement has a two-part compensation structure with a cost to the city for processing, and payment to the city for the value of the recyclables. Both rates were determined to be fair and competitive by a public bidding process. Since processing is a fixed cost, the city pays a flat rate per ton which escalates annually based on the Consumer Price Index. The rebate received by the city for the value of the material is a variable amount based on market value. The city receives a percentage of the actual revenue Republic receives for that material. The shared revenue structure incentivizes Republic to get the best price while allowing the city to benefit from favorable market conditions but also share the risk of market downturns.
The pricing structure described above is provided separately for loads of cardboard only and loads of mixed recyclables. Mixed recyclables are difficult to process into individual commodities, many of which are low in value. This results in a net cost to the city. Since SB 1383 regulations require businesses to recycle a wide range of materials, about 80% of what the city collects is mixed.
Dedicated cardboard loads are easy to sort and the material is high in value, frequently resulting in net revenue. Nearly all dedicated cardboard loads are collected through large compactor service for individual customers, so although the city initially receives this revenue, it is then returned to the customer to offset some of the cost of hauling.
The Division has been satisfied with Republic’s performance under the agreement and desires to secure the capacity for this material through a one -year contract extension. In F iscal Year 2026- 27, the Division will release a new Request for Proposals to secure a longer-term solution.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
In Fiscal Year 2026–27, the Waste and Recycling Division is projecting to spend about $288,000 after all rebates, for the processing and diversion of commercial recyclables collected from Folsom businesses. Since both the processing fee and rebate amounts are per ton, the amount of material collected will impact final cost as will market fluctuation for the value of the material. The projected cost is based on recent trends for both factors. Funds are budgeted and available in the Solid Waste Fund (Fund 540).
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 11641 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a One - Year Extension to the Agreement (Contract No. 173- 21 20- 046) with Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC for an Estimated Cost of $288,000 from the Solid Waste Operating Fund (Fund 540) for Processing and Diversion of Commercial Recyclables
2. Agreement for the Purchase, Diversion and Processing of Commercial Recyclable Material between City of Folsom and Recycling Industries, Inc.
3. Assignment agreement between City of Folsom and Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC
Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
Attachment 1
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
Resolution No. 11641
RESOLUTION NO. 11641
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A ONE- YEAR EXTENSION TO THE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 173-21 20-046) WITH
ALLIED WASTE SERVICES OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC FOR AN ESTIMATED COST OF $288,000 FROM THE SOLID WASTE OPERATING FUND (FUND 540) FOR
PROCESSING AND DIVERSION OF COMMERCIAL RECYCLABLES
WHEREAS, California’s Mandatory Commercial Recycling Law (AB 341) requires businesses to have a recycling program; and
WHEREAS, California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy (SB 1383) expanded on the requirements of AB 341 to require specific business recycling program parameters; and
WHEREAS, SB 1383 requires California jurisdictions to provide businesses with a collection program for recyclables; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom (City) Waste and Recycling Division (Division) provides recycling collection services available to all businesses within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Division relies on the services of a private facility to provide a compliant program by diverting collected materials from landfill disposal; and
WHEREAS, the current term of the facility agreement will end on June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the agreement contains an optional one -year extension upon mutual agreement of both parties; and
WHEREAS, the Division has been satisfied with the vendor ’s performance under the existing agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Division has determined that extending the agreement by one -year is in the best interest of the City; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Solid Waste Operating Fund (540); and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to Execute a One-Year Extension to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20- 046) with Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC for an Estimated Cost of $288,000 from the Solid Waste Operating Fund (Fund 540) for Processing and Diversion of Commercial Recyclables.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9
th day of June 2026, by the following roll-call vote:
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
Resolution No. 11641
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
__________________________________
Justin Raithel, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
Attachment 2
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
CITY OF FOLSOM AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL RECYCLABLE MATERIAL
PURCHASE, DIVERSION & PROCESSING SERVICES
WITH RECYCLING INDUSTRIES, INC.
This Agreement for Commercial Recyclable Material Purchase, Diversion & Processing Services ("Agreement") is made by and between the City of Folsom, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Recycling lndustries, lnc., a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR," as of July 1, 2020 ("Execution Date"), to read in its entirety as hereinafter set forth.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the State of California has found and declared that the amount of solid waste generated in California, coupled with diminishing landfill space and potential adverse environmental impacts from land filling, have created an urgent need for State and local agencies to enact and implement aggressive integrated waste management programs; and
WHEREAS, the CITY is required to implement plans for providing solid waste handling services to its citizens under the provisions of the California lntegrated Waste Management Act (the "Act" or "AB 939"), which is set forth in the California Public Resources Code at Section 40000, ef seq., including source reduction, recycling, composting activities and the collection, transfer and disposal of solid waste within the CITY boundaries subject to solid waste handling jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the CITY is required to divert at least 50% of its solid waste from landfills; and
WHEREAS, the state passed Assembly Bill 341 that set a goal to divert 75% of the waste stream by 2020; and
WHEREAS, due to the China National Sword program the costs for the provision of recycling services have increased significantly thereby negatively affecting the provision of recycling services and reduced the scrap value for recyclable materials throughout California and the rest of the United States; and WHEREAS, the City did issue Request for Pro sals No. SW- and received proposals from qualified respondents; and
WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR submitted the highest ranking proposal as determined by the CITY'S review committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did pass Resolution No. 10403, selecting CONTRACTOR for the Purchase, Diversion & Processing of its Commercial Recycling Materials; and
Folsom File No. 173-2120-046
-ilrf,ilililfr
ilif,|ililfi iltt lltt
37735
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
1 WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR, by reason of its qualifications, experience, and capabilities for performing the type of services contemplated herein, has proposed to provide the requested services; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to enter into this Agreement as follows.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:
Scope of Service
The scope of services to be provided by this Agreement are those services identified in EXHIBIT A attached hereto, the CITY'S Request for Proposal (RFP) SW 19120-01 dated December 20,2019 as amended, and CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated January 10,2020. Both the RFP and the Proposal are hereby incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. ln the event of any inconsistencies or ambiguities this Agreement shall govern overall.
CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all services stated in this Agreement for the compensation described herein.
2. Term of Aqreement
This Agreement shall be effective as of the date executed by all parties and approved as to form by the City Attorney and shall continue for a period of five (5) years with up to two one (1) year extensions that would be mutually agreed upon by both parties, by providing 90 days written notice prior to the expiration of the then-current term or any extension thereto. The services of this Agreement shall commence upon the full execution of the Agreement and continue unless othenryise terminated as set forth in Section 17 of this Agreement.
Community Service Program CRV Payment (CP): This Agreement shall remain in effect for an additional two (2) years beyond the term shown above, including any early termination and all extensions thereto, for the purposes of processing payment of any CP due to CITY or CONTRACTOR from CalRecycle.
3. Payments to or from the CITY
Payments to or from the CITY for the Services described shall be paid using the Folsom Recycling Rebate Worksheet prepared monthly by CONTRACTOR according to Section 4 of Exhibit A.
The CITY shall have the right to review all books and records kept by the CONTRACTOR and any SUB-CONTRACTORS in connection with the operation, invoicing and services performed under this Agreement.
2 Recycling I ndustries Commercial Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
4. Submission of Pavments
Payments due to CITY from CONTRACTOR on all material delivered to CONTRACTOR from the previous month must be received by the last day of the month following the month the materialwas delivered. Payments due to CONTRACTOR must be received by CONTRACTOR within 30 days from the date of the CONRACTOR's invoice.
CONTRACTOR shalltransmit payments and invoices relating to the purchase and processing of the CITY's Commercial Recyclable Materials to:
City of Folsom, Solid Waste/Recycling Division
Attn : Envi ronmental Specialist Supervisor
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, California 95630
CITY shall transmit payments relating to the purchase and processing of the CITY's Commercial Recyclable Materials to:
Recycling lndustries, lnc.
Attention: Accounting Department
4T4l WattAvenue
North Highlands, CA 95660
Standards of Performance
CONTRACTOR is authorized and able to do business in the State of California as a processor of waste materials. CONTRACTOR agrees that Services shall be performed and completed in the manner and in accordance with professional standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONTRACTOR and its SUB-CONTRACTORS or agents are engaged. This includes, without limitation, proper materials separation, recycling, marketing and disposal practices that are typically observed in this profession and are identified in further detail under Exhibit A, Request for Proposal No.SW-19120-001, CONTRACTOR shall not, either during or after the term of the Agreement, make public any reports or articles, or disclose to any third party any confidential information relative to this Agreement.
lntentionally Omitted
lnde Contractor
A. lt is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR's officers, agents, employees and subcontractors) is an independent CONTRACTOR and that no relationship of employer-employee exists between the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the payment of all taxes, workers' compensation insurance and unemployment insurance. Should CONTRACTOR desire any insurance protection, CONTRACTOR is to acquire same at its sole expense.
Re cy cl i n g t n d u str i e s Co m m e rc i o I Re cy cl i n g P r oce s s i n g Ag rtr r rc n, 5 6
7
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
8. B. CONTRACTOR's assigned personnel shall not be entitled to any benefits payable to employees of CITY.
C. CITY is not required to make any deductions or withholdings from the compensation payable to CONTRACTOR under the provisions of the Agreement and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of CONTRACTOR's assigned personnel.
D. CONTRACTOR, in the performance of its obligation hereunder, is only subject to the control or direction of CITY as to the designation of tasks to be performed and the results to be accomplished.
E. Any third persons employed or hired by CONTRACTOR shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of CONTRACTOR.
F. CONTRACTOR hereby indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from any and all claims that may be made against CITY based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Agreement. ln the event CONTRACTOR or any employee, agent, or SUB- CONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the CITY, CONTRACTOR shall further indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the CITY for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of CONTRACTOR or its employees, agents, or SUB-CONTRACTORS, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of CITY.
NTRACTOR enters into this Agreement as an independent CONTRACTOR and not as an officer, employee or representative of the CITY. Accordingly, CONTRACTOR shall provide information, recommendation, and advice to CITY, but shall possess no authority with respect to any CITY decision and no right to act on behalf of CITY in any capacity as agent, or to bind CITY to any obligations whatsoever.
Conflict of lnterest
CONTRACTOR certifies that it has disclosed to CITY any actual, apparent, or potential conflicts of interest that may exist relative to the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. CONTRACTOR agrees to advise CITY of any actual, apparent or potential conflicts of interest that may develop subsequent to the date of execution of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR further agrees to complete any statements of economic interest required by either CITY ordinance or State law.
9 4
Recycling lndustries Commercial Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
10. Neither this Agreement, any duties or obligations under this Agreement, nor the intention or expectations of the CITY will cause the CONTRACTOR to be a "public official" as that term is used in California Government Code section 87100. The CITY and CONTRACTOR agree that the CONTRACTOR is not a "public official" or "participating in governmental decisions" as those terms are used in section 87100. The CITY and CONTRACTOR also agree that no actions and opinions necessary for the performance of duties under this Agreement will cause the CONTRACTOR to be a "public official" or "participating in a governmental decision" as those terms are used in section 87100. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to be inconsistent with the CONTRACTOR's status as an independent CONTRACTOR.
Assiqnment and Subcontractinq
CONTRACTOR's rights, duties and obligations under this Agreement are not assignable or transferable, and CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any work, without the prior written approval of the CITY.
11. Ownership of Work Product
All technical data, evaluations, reports, plans and other work products of CONTRACTOR provided hereunder shall become the property of CITY and shall be delivered to CITY upon completion of the services authorized hereunder.
CONTRACTOR may retain copies thereof for its files and internal use. CITY representatives shall have access to work products for the purpose of inspecting same and determining that the services are being performed in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Publication of the information derived from work performed or data obtained in connection with services rendered under this Agreement must be approved in writing by CITY.
Both parties recognize that the CITY is a public entity subject to the requirements of the California Public Records Act ("PRA"). CONTRACTOR understands that the release of any written, printed, graphic, or electronically recorded information and document delivered by CONTRACTOR to the CITY will be governed by the PRA and agrees that the release of such material pursuant to the PRA shall not require CONTRACTOR's prior consent or approval.
12. lndemnification
CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, protect, defend, save and hold CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for death or injury to persons, or damage to property resulting from intentional or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR's officers, employees, volunteers, and agents during performance of this Agreement, or from any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct, negligent acts, or omissions of CONTRACTOR or its employees, SUB- CONTRACTORs, or agents, or by the quality or character of CONTRACTOR's work. lt is understood that the duty of CONTRACTOR to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by CITY of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve CONTRACTOR from liability under 5 Recycling I ndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply and shall further survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. By execution of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration.
13. lnsurance
During the term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall maintain and provide evidence of insurance coverage as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, at its own cost and expense. 14 Emplovment Practices
CONTRACTOR, by execution of this Agreement, certifies that it does not discriminate against any person upon the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, religion, disability or marital status in its employment practices.
15. Licenses. Permits. Etc.
CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature legally required for CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain and/or keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for CONTRACTOR to practice its profession at the time the services are performed.
16. Records
CONTRACTOR shall maintain records, books, documents and other evidence directly pertinent to the performance of work under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices.
17. Earlv Termination
CITY or CONTRACTOR may terminate the Agreement with or without cause by providing one hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice at any time during the term of the Agreement. ln the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR shall pay CITY and provide all services to CITY up to and including the date of termination.
18. Amendments
Any modification or amendment of any provision of this Agreement shall be in writing and must be executed by both parties hereto.
19. lncidentalBeneficiaries
It is expressly understood and agreed that the enforcement of these terms and conditions shall be reserved to CITY and CONTRACTOR. Nothing contained in the Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any third person. lt is the express intent of the CITY and CONTRACTOR that any 6 Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
such person or entity, other than CITY and CONTRACTOR, receiving services or benefits under this Agreement shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary.
20. Miscellaneous Provisions
A. Attorneys' Fees: ln the event an action or proceeding is instituted by either party for the breach or enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys'fees according to law.
B. Venue: This Agreement shall be deemed to be made in, and the rights and liabilities of the parties, and the interpretation and construction of the Agreement governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any legal action arising out of this Agreement shall be filed in and adjudicated by a state court in the County of Sacramento, State of California.
C. Enforceability: lf any term or provision of this Agreement is found to be void, voidable, invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction under the laws of the State of California, any and all of the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement shall remain binding.
D. Time: All times stated herein or in any other contract documents are of the essence.
E. Binding: This Agreement shall bind and inure to the heirs, devisees, assignees and successors in interest of CONTRACTOR and to the successors in interest of CITY in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein.
F. Survivorship: Any responsibility of CONTRACTOR for warranties, insurance, indemnity, record keeping or compliance with laws with respect to this Agreement shall not be invalidated due to the expiration, termination or cancellation of this Agreement.
G. Waiver: ln the event that either CITY or CONTRACTOR shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. Waiver shall not be deemed effective until and unless signed by the waiving party.
21. Entire Aqreement
This instrument and any attachments hereto constitute the entire Agreement between the CITY and CONTRACTOR concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior oral and written communications between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof.
22. Authoritv to Execute
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrants and represents that he/she/they has/have the authority to execute this 7 Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
Agreement on behalf of their entity and has/have the authority to bind their party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
23. Counterparts
This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and will become effective and binding upon the parties at such time as all of the signatories hereto have signed a counterpart of this Agreement. All counterparts so executed shall constitute one Agreement binding on all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the same counterpart.
END OF TEXT - SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS
8 Re cycl i ng I n d u stri es Com me rcio I Recycl i ng P rocessi ng Ag re e me nt
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
IN WITNESS WHEREOtr', the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed.
RECYCLING INDUSTRIES,INC., a Califomia (If a corporation, must be signed by two Corporation: officers of the corporation per Corporations Code section 313.)
$q -ZI 6t 5>
Date
ignature
Print Name
I.D.
\
fb
Title Title
CITY OF FOLSOM, A Municipal Corporation:
lo ,a IP
Date
ATTEST:
Elaine Andersen, City Manager
FTINDING AVAILABLE:
lo 7) 7e
Freemantle, City Date Tamagni, Finance Director Date
ORIGIN AS TO CONTENT: ORIGINAL APPROVED RM:
o20 to/zoloau
Dave Nugen, Public Director S 4fl8, City Attorney Date
ON
A certificate of acknowledgment in provisions bf Califomia Civil Code section 1189 must be attached for each person executing this agreement on behalf of contractor. This section provides, atpart (b): "Any certificate of acknowledgment taken in another place shall be sufficient in this state if it is taken in accordance with the laws of the place where the acknowledgment is made." 9 Recycling lndustries Commerciql Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT ctvtL coDE g 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of 9eCznmpurD
On gfrEN^g,uR- ttu. AnArr before me, KuaG-tft.H,? S.169,' NoStsY RtFLrC Dote Here lnsert Nome ond Title of the Officer
personary appeared Wpg( Scorr XuFr*rrrfu d- Um'orC urEg-LY kURtotrtv Name(s) of Signe(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. )
z
XII{CERLEY i055
Not.ry lublic - Crlifornir
Sacrrmento County
Commission t 2267121
My Comm. Expiras May 2. 2023
I certifu under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
Ploce Notory Seal qnd/or Stomp Above Signoture of
OPTIONAL
Completing this informotion con deter alterotion of the document or froudulent reottochment of this form to on unintended document.
Description of Attached Document Ctft oF Fq-bol.^ A([email protected]'1- RE cor*sruRcLAL tst-E Title or Type of Document: &
Document Date: rk Number of Pages:
\Nc-Signe(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Glaimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Signer's Name
tr Corporate Officer - Title(s): tr Cor - Title(s):
El Partner- n Limited n General -nLimitedtrGeneral
5 tr lndividual
rl Trustee
n Other:
El Attorney i u lndividual
u Trustee
tr Attorney in Fact
n Guardian or Conservator
o Other:
presenting:
02018 National Notary Association
or Conservator
Signer is Representing:
:l
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
1 EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is the scope of work for the purchase, processing and diversion services for the CITY of Folsom's Commercial Recyclable Materials:
CITY MATERIALS
1.1 Tonnaqe liveries
The CITY shall make its best effort to deliver an AVERAGE of 250 tons per month (3,000 tons/year) of CITY MATERIAL to CONTRACTOR's Receiving Facility.
1.2 Mandato Materials
Table 1 below reflects the mandatory materials the CONTRACTOR shall accept and process.
TABLE 1
Mandatorv
All Grades of Paper
All Glass Containers
All Plastic Containers
s"&
Steel, Bimetal and Aluminum
Foil & Cans
All Plastic Toys
Plastic Film (optional)
Styrofoam (optional)
1.3 UnpermittedMaterials
The CONTRACTOR shall maintain a load checking program designed to find materials which are not permitted to be delivered or handled at the CONTRACTOR's facility (hereinafter "Unpermitted Materials"). Unpermitted Materials include and are similar to, but are not limited to, materials designated as "hazardous" materials, medical and/or infectious waste, liquid waste, sewage sludge, special wastes, radioactive material, ash residue, or asbestos pursuant to the CONTRACTOR's permits or other laws and regulations for unacceptable materials at the facility.
Loads delivered by the CITY to the CONTRACTOR's transfer or receiving facility shall be inspected within fifteen (15) minutes of receipt by the CONTRACTOR to determine if said load contains any Unpermitted Materials. lf the CONTRACTOR finds Unpermitted Materials in a load delivered by the CITY, then the 1_0
Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
CONTRACTOR shall set aside the load and advise the CITY of said issue. The CITY must be notified via an email address AND cell phone number, both provided by CITY, within thirty (30) minutes of receipt of the load. Notification will not be considered delivered until the CONTRACTOR has received an acknowledgement of receipt of notification from CITY, either by email response or contact by telephone. The CITY shall arrange for, and have the unpermitted material removed within 18 hours of receipt of notice from the CONTRACTOR. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to notify the CITY of the unpermitted material will constitute acceptance of the load by the CONTRACTOR.
1.35 Prohibited Materials
The materials listed in Section 4.55 herein when found in the OCC loads shall be considered Prohibited Materials, otherwise known as contamination, and cause the load in question to be downgraded pursuant to that Section as follows.
The CONTRACTOR shall inspect each OCC load delivered or handled at the CONTRACTOR's facility for Prohibited Materials. Upon discovery of Prohibited Materials, the CONTRACTOR shall provide photographic evidence of the Prohibited Materials found in the load. The CONTRACTOR shall send photographs to the City at an email address designated by the City. The photographs must be sent within 24 hours of any loads downgraded pursuant to Section 4.55 herein and documented upon delivery of City material.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1 .45 of this Agreement, the City reserves the right to require the Contractor to weigh the amount of claimed contaminants to verify the claimed contamination. Failure to notify the City and provide photographic evidence shall waive any claim of Prohibited Materials or downgrade of materials.
1.4 GitvMaterialCharacterization
Within 20 days following the end of each quarter, CONTRACTOR shall conduct a total facility characterization of all tons processed from the CCMG (comingled) bunker and shipped by them during that quarter, including inventory that has been processed, but not yet shipped, The results of the characterization will be applied to all CITY MATERIAL delivered to CONTRACTOR during the next quarter. The initial composition found in the table below is from the first quarter (January- March) of 2020 (2020-Q1). The CONTRACTOR shall perform a new facility characterization for each quarter to determine the material composition to be applied to all CITY MATERIAL for the next quarter.
The characterization protocol must be documented in a Microsoft Excelformat and must include the following detail: a total of the net weight and percent of each recyclable material recovered (shipped and inventoried) during the subject quarter and the total net weight and percent of residual material shipped and inventoried during the subject quarter. This information shall be aggregated into a summary for the subject quarter in the format of the table below.
L'J"
Re cycl i n g I nd u stri e s Co m me rciol Re cycl i ng P rocessi ng Ag ree me nt
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
The CITY reserves the right to send a representative to the CONTRACTOR's facility to observe or review the characterization preparation and calculations to ensure that the CITY's interests are being met.
TABLE 2
FACILITY CHARACTERIZATION AND
MARKET VALUE
REVENUE/EXPENSE PERCENTAGE
COMMODITY
FOR 2020-Ql
Percent of Total
(bv weiqht)
PERCENT
REVENUE
PERCENT
EXPENSE
News #61#8 0o/o 70 130
Cardboard (OCC) 4132% 90 110
Mixed Paper 2056% 90 110
#1 PET .88o/o 80 120
#2 HDPE-Natural .27o/o 80 120
#2 HDPE-Colored .49o/o 80 120
#3 - #7 Sinsle Resin 0o/o 80 120
Mixed Riqid Plastic .16% 80 120
Aluminum .39o/o 80 120
Tin/Steel Cans 1.1 00/ 80 120
Other Metal 2.39% 80 120
3-Mix Glass 4.79% 80 120
Film Plastic 0% BO 120
Styrofoam 0o/o BO 120
Residual 27.86 80 120
Total 100.00%
1.45 City Contamination Audit
Once every six (6) months, on a date and time selected by the CONTRACTOR and approved by the City, the CONTRACTOR shall select a random load of OCC on which to conduct a Contamination Audit. The CONTRACTOR shall provide at least seven calendar days advance notice to the CITY of the Audit. The purpose of the Audit is to help identify the types and amounts of Prohibited Materials in the loads. The CONTRACTOR shall remove allthe Prohibited Materials from the random OCC load and weigh each material type and record the various materialtypes and weights on a log, in a format designated by the City, that will be provided to the City upon completion of the Audit.
Recycting I ndustries Commercial Recycling Process;i ng Agrr, ^!j,
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
1.5 Citv Commodities
Type of individually sorted commodities gleaned from CITY MATERIAL by the CONTRACTOR.
a. Market Value: Market value is the average scrap price per ton of individual commodities based on the actual commodity sales made by CONTRACTOR in the prior month added to CalRecycle RV payments for those commodities where California redemption value is available (currently aluminum, PET, HDPE and glass). The average per ton scrap price for each commodity will be the result of dividing the total value of the sales (positive or negative) of each commodity for a month by the total tons of the same commodity sold in the same month.
b. Revenue/Expense Percentage: Each month, CONTRACTOR will pay CITY a percentage as indicated in the table above of the positive market value (revenue) for each commodity sold the prior month and will debit the percentage of the negative market value (expense) for each commodity sold the prior month. lf any individual commodity is not sold during any month, the market value for the last month that individual commodity was sold will be used to establish the current market value for that commodity.
1.55 Addition of New Gommodities
The CITY may add new items in the future contingent on the marketability of those items and that any future sorts are mutually agreed upon between CITY and CONTRACTOR.
Any added materials to be sorted would require a new waste characterization of CITY material and the cost for that characterization would be borne by the party making the request. Any additional processing costs incurred by the CONTRACTOR for performing sorts on additional materials would be mutually agreeable between CONTRACTOR and CITY and would be applied as a contract amendment to the CONTRACTOR'S processing costs.
2. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTOR
2.1 CONTRACTOR shall allow the CITYs representative to inspect the CONTACTOR's facilities during normal operating hours with at least24 hour prior notification to ensure compliance with the agreement.
2.2 CONTRACTOR shall, at all times, assure that ingress, egress, and tipping area visibility is unobstructed by stored material or immoveable objects so that CITY vehicles may safely move on and off site.
2.3 CONTRACTOR's facility shall be designed and maintained to meet industry safety standards. CONTRACTOR shall ensure safe maneuvering of CITY vehicles and proper placement of loads when tipping. CONTRACTOR shall also provide an area for tipping of CITY vehicles separate from the general public (self-haul customers).
2.4 CONTRACTOR's facility shall provide all-weather surfaces to access tipping areas for CITY vehicles. All working roads and surfaces must be designed, constructed, and L3
Recycling I ndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
maintained to ensure lateral flow of surface water to prevent ponding, washout, overflow, and heavy-load damage.
2.5 CONTRACTOR shall be operationally and financially responsible for disposing of all residual materials from processed Clry material.
2.6 CONTRACTOR's receiving facilities shall be available to receive Clry vehicles SIX days per week, Monday through Saturday, any time from 6:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. (2:00 p.m. on Saturdays). The CITY collection fleets operate on all CITY holidays that fall on weekdays and Saturdays, and the CONTRACTOR's facility shall be open to weigh and accept Clry vehicles on those days.
2.65 CONTRACTOR shall provide all required equipment and labor for the processing of curbside recyclables. The CONTRACTOR shall have a certified truck scale on-site to weigh all incoming loads of CITY MATERIAL. CONTRACTOR shall provide documentation of scale certification upon request by the Clry.
2.7 CONTRACTOR shall limit queuing of CITY vehicles. CITY vehicles shall be able to enter CONTRACTOR'S facility, obtain weight and unload all commodities in a maximum of 15 minutes. Clry vehicle drivers will monitor the waiting time outside and at the CONTRACTOR's facility. lf the waiting time on any given day is greater than 15 minutes, there will be a charge of $1 per minute (over 15 minutes) to the CONTRACTOR made by the CITY collection vehicle to the facility for that day.
2.75 CONTRACTOR shall maintain the calibration of the scales and scale software used at its receiving facilities. The CONTRACTOR shall provide a receipt for each load to the vehicle driver. The receipt shall show the date, time, site address, and truck number, material type, and weights (gross, tare, net) at a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall use stored tare weights for CITY vehicles. The CONTRACTOR shall provide a monthly detailed report in a format approved by the CITY showing information relating to each load of CITY material delivered to the CONTRACTOR's facility.
2.8 CONTRACTOR shall accept all materials for off-loading CITY vehicles at the same location. Under no circumstances will the CITY agree to tip part of a truckload at one facility and then part of the same load at a second facility.
2.85 CONTRACTOR shall provide the use of non-pay, local call only, telephone in the event that a Clry driver needs to contact a supervisor regarding CITY business (e.9., equipment failure, sickness, etc.).
2.9 lf the CONTRACTOR is unable to accept Clry tonnage at its primary receiving facility on any given day, the CONTRACTOR shall provide a substitute receiving facility or compensate the Clry in the amount equal to any difference between the amount the CITY would have received with full and uninterrupted services under this Agreement and the amount the CITY actually receives for delivery of CITY material to another facility during the period of the CONTRACTOR's inability to correct the failure and resume full performance. Any additional off-route costs incurred by the CITY shall be included in the additional amounts paid by the CONTRACTOR to the CITY under this provision. These t4
Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement Page 128 06/09/2026 Item No.7.
additional off-route costs will be determined using the same time and motion methodology used to determine the off-route costs to CONTRACTOR's facility lf CONTRACTOR is unable to provide a substitute receiving facility that meets the requirements of Section 15 of this Agreement and Exhibit A, Section 2.6 of this Agreement, CITY reserves the right to secure an alternate delivery facility on its own behalf until CONTRACTOR can attain a suitable alternate delivery facility. This does not excuse CONTRACTOR from its obligation to secure an alternate facility under this Section. lf CITY is able to secure an alternate facility, CONTRACTOR shall compensate the CITY under Exhibit A, Section 4.60 of this Agreement.
2.95 CONTRACTOR assumes full ownership of CITY loads once CITY collection vehicles have scaled in and tipped at CONTRACTOR'S receiving facilities, except for loads or the portion of a load that have been found to contain unpermitted materials per Exhibit A, Section 1.3 of the Agreement.
2.96 CONTRACTOR will prepare Monthly Recycling Rebate Worksheet and invoice or submit payment to CITY monthly based on the amount due.
2.97 CONTRACTOR will calculate and include in the Monthly Recycling Rebate Worksheet the CONTRACTOR's Processing Costs based on the requirements within Section 4 of the Agreement.
3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY
3.1 CITY shall deliver Commercial Recyclable loads to the CONTRATOR's facility.
There will be an average of 2-3 truckloads or 7-10 tons per day delivered. CITY shall make its best effort to deliver an average of 250 tons per month or 3000 tons per year to CONTRACTOR's receiving facilities but will make not guarantee that it can meet this goal during the term of the Agreement.
3.2 CITY will provide CONTRACTOR with an updated Holiday schedule each year during the term of this Agreement.
3.3 CITY will distribute periodic public outreach and education materials regarding the optimal use of the CITY's Commercial Recycling Program.
3.4 CITY will transmit payment for invoices within 30 days of the date of the invoice
4. FINANCIAL FACTORS
4.1 Monthlv Recvclins Rebate Worksheet & CONTRAGTOR Settlement The Monthly Recycling Rebate Worksheet (Sample Attached) shall be used as the supporting documentation with the CONTRACTOR's monthly invoices or payments to CITY for settlement of CITY recycling rebates. The CONfRACTOR shall invoice or pay the CITY monthly. The invoice will reflect the amount due from or to the CITY for all CITY material delivered to CONTRACTOR's receiving facility. The invoiced amount for CITY material will be based on the total tons received by the CONTRACTOR for each 15 Re cycl i ng I nd u stries Co m me rcio I Re cycl i ng P rocess i ng Ag re e me nt
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
billing month. Scale records from the CONTRACTOR's scale system will be used for billing purposes when the CITY delivers materials directly to the CONTRACTOR's receiving facilities. Payments to the CITY will be due by the last day of the month following the month the material was delivered. Payments to the CONTRACTOR will be due 30 days from the date of the invoice to CITY. A Late Payment Penalty of eight percent (8%) will be assessed on all late payments, with an additional monthly interest charge of one and one half percent (1.5%), compounded monthly for every month thereafter. Monthly updates to the Commodity pricing as specified under Section 1.5 of this Exhibit shall be performed by CONTRACTOR staff and incorporated into the monthly invoices to CITY.
4.15 Contractor's Revenue to CITY
Market value is the average scrap price per ton of individual commodities based on the actual commodity sales made by CONTRACTOR in the prior month added to CalRecycle RV payments for those commodities where California redemption value is available (currently aluminum, PET, HDPE and glass). The average scrap price for each commodity will be the result of dividing the total value of the sales (positive or negative) of each commodity for a month by the total tons of the same commodity sold in the same month. Each month, CONTRACTOR will pay CITY the percentage of positive market value (revenue) for each commodity sold the prior month and will debit CITY the percentage of negative market value (expense) for each commodity sold the prior month as identified in Table 2 above. lf any individual commodity is not sold during any month, the market value for the last month that individual commodity was sold will be used to establish the current market value for that commodity.
4.2 Gross Revenue Per Ton
The Gross Revenue Per Ton is the CITY's allocated per ton value of the commodities as described in Section 4.15, calculated by multiplying the waste characterization percentage for each commodity, as determined in Section 1.4, by the prior month's market value for the same commodity.
4.25 Net Revenue Per Ton Pavment/Charqe
The Net revenue per ton is the per ton difference of the Gross Revenue Per ton and the CONTRACTOR's processing costs. Gross Revenue/ton - CONTRACTOR Processing cosUton = Net Revenueffon. The Net Revenue per ton may be positive or negative and is either the unit price per ton the CONTRACTOR will pay the CITY for its materials when the Net Revenue per ton is positive, or the unit price per ton the CITY will pay CONTRACTOR for its materials if the NET Revenue per ton is negative.
4.30 Gontractor Processino Cost and Contamination Reduction Offset This is the unit price cost the CONTRACTOR retains for receiving, sorting, baling, residual handling/disposal, marketing, and otherwise all other associated costs to process the CITY's material. The initial CONTRACTOR Processing Cost is $49.00 per ton for old corruoated containers (O and $119.75 oer ton for commercial cominqled recvclables (CCMG) as indicated in the Monthly Recycling Rebate L6
Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
Worksheet.
4.35 California Redemption Value Commoditv Gompensation The CONTRACTOR shall compensate the CITY for 100% the Redemption Value and Administrative Fees from the containers through the monthly revenue payments to the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall retain all of the Processing Payments received from CalRecycle from the CITY's material.
4.40 Supplemental Curbside Collectors Pavments (SCGP)
SCCP shall not be included as part of the California Redemption Value (RV) Funding items. The CITY shall retain the entire amount of the SCCP based on the most recent values calculated by CalRecycle (This is evaluated on tonnages shipped during the prior year). These amounts shall be calculated from DR-6 forms submitted by the CONTRACTOR to CalRecycle. The CITY will receive the SCCP funds directly from CalRecycle.
4.45 CRV Volume Reportinq Requirement
The CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR uses the facility Curbside Allocation methodology to report amounts of RV Materials to CalRecycle.
4.50 Contractor Annual Adiustments To Processins Costs
Adiustment Method
The CONTRACTOR Processing Cost shall be adjusted annually each July 1't, based on 100o/o of the annual change in the water and sewer and trash collection services Consumer Price lndex (CPl), in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted (Series lD: CUSR0000SEHG). The first annual adjustment shall be effective July 1 ,2021.
Maximum CPI Adiustment
The maximum annual CPI adjustment (increase or decrease) shall be no more than four percent (4%).First CPI Adjustment - Effective July 1, 2021 the CONTRACTOR Processing Cost shall be adjusted by an amount equal to the lesser of four percent (4%) or 100oh of the increase (or decrease if applicable) in the calculated CPI value.
4.55 Moisture Claims and Downgrades
The CITY shall be released from any moisture claims associated with the delivery of ONP #61#8, OCC and Mixed Paper in loads delivered by CITY to CONTRACTOR's receiving facilities.
Clean OCC delivered by the CITY to the CONTRACTOR's receiving facility shall not exceed 1 .0o/o by weight of Prohibited Materials. Prohibited Materials include but are not limited to wax cardboard, plastic, garbage, wood, hazardous waste, food waste, inerts, rock, or other non-fiber content. Any load exceeding these limits will be downgraded to a 17 Recycling I ndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
CCMG load and subject to the CCMG pricing
4.60 Price Neutralitv
The CITY requires a "Price Neutrality" clause. This clause will ensure the CITY remains "whole" in the event the CONTRACTOR is unable to perform the work of this agreement for a short period of time due to delays in facility operation, short-term facility closure, or any other condition that would prevent the CONTRACTOR from receiving CITY material normally directed to CONTRACTOR's facility during the term of this agreement. This Price Neutrality will ensure that the CITY receives the full compensation the CITY would have othenvise received from the CONTRACTOR as if the CITY materials were actually delivered to CONTRACTOR.
4.65 CitvFinancialAudit
The CITY reserves the right to audit the CONTRACTOR to determine the amount of CITY material processed and obtain any adjustments to that amount. CITY shall pay the costs of third party audit.
4.70 Contractor Performance Securitv
The CONTRACTOR shall provide and maintain a form of Performance Security that is acceptable to the CITY Attorney, to ensure continued services to the CITY. The security shall be renewed annually on or about July first of each year and may be in the form of a Letter of Credit, Performance Bond, cash, or such other type of security acceptable to the CITY. The security shall not be less than $50,000, which represents the estimated costs to the CITY to procure a replacement CONTRACTOR. The CITY shall be eligible to execute against the Security and/or terminate this Agreement if CONTRACTOR is unable or unwilling to perform the Agreement, or any portion thereof, after having been given not less than 60 days prior notification to perform by the CITY. 18 Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
boc)
()
Q
a-
6'
r)o
o
ei
o
b(D
o
C)
Q
\
do(o
ta
!Q
to
(!r
*io
Folsom Monthly Recycling Rebste Worksheet
sub-total 72.r4% Ss5.42
Scrap Revenue per Ton to City
RV and AF perTon Due to City
Gross Reveue Per Ton to Gty
Contractor Processing Cost per Ton
Net Revenue (Costl Per Ton to Citv
a
llt-m
o:l
J
Foo
o
5'(o
nou
0)
o
=o:x
@
J
oo
-S5o.oo
OCC Tons Processed
OCC Revenue per ton per Contractor
Less Contractor Processing Fee
Gros Reveue Per Ton to Gty
Net Revenue (Cost) Per Ton to Gty
14.18 s88.7e
(S+s.oo1
$39.79
S3e.7e
$sq.ag
s21.s8
$s6.42
($rrc.zs1
(s53.331
DUE TO CITY 766.
Total Material
Monthly Value
So.oo
S4,854.88
S195.92
Ss8.1o
51,025.18
5298.93
S1,798.08
S107.14
s11s.32
so.oo
$r.go
s0.00
(s1ss.23l
So.oo
s33.02
S1.34
$o.lg
$e.gr
$2.03
S122o
$0.73
S0.78
So.oo
$0.01
So.oo
-S1.os
I lon
Unit Revenue
5o.oo
S1.99
S1.82
So.o8
So.rc
/ton
Revenue
Tons
Redeemed
Processing Fees/Payments (PPl
100X netained by Contractor
Value
/Ton
So.oo
S41.58
S207.63
S28.1s
s28.1s
$4.02
/Ton
Revenue
So.or
So.o,
$o.o!
$o.ot
So.oo
Administrattue Fees {AFl
(0.75% of Rl/)
100% Relained bv Citv
Value
lTon
S24.oo
s0.s1
Ss.9o
$o.qz
S0.47
5316
S1ls5
$o.u
$o.sl
lTon
Revenue
S6.r4
100% Retained bv Citv
RetundValue (RV|
Value
lTon
S320o.oo
SE8.oE
S1.32ooo
s62.oo
SG2.oo
Scrap
Revenue/Ton
Due to City
So.oo
S33.02
$1.34
S0.39
S0.78
(s1.2sl
5o.so
So.sE
5o.qz
s0.00
So.o1
5o.oo
(s1.0sl
Percent Stfap
Revenue Due
to Chy
70%
90%
90%
80%
80%
120%
80%
80%
80%
80%
80%
L20%
$o.oo
s35.69
s1.4e
S0.49
90.98 ls1.04l
$0.70
So.zo
s0.s9
5o.oo
$o.oz
$o.oo
($o-881
lndexed Scrap
Revenue/Ton
Market
Value/Ton
57.22 S88,79
57.22 s4s.00
S508.89
-S21.82
s80.s4
Sz60.oc
s120.0c
Sooc
S10,oc
Sooc
-S36.8c
Percent of
Total Tons
Proessd
Iotal Tons Processed
Commodity
News (#6/fl81
occ l11l
Mhed Paper (21
fm cans
Aluminum
Glas{3-Mkl
PET
HDPE-Natural
HDPFColor
S3 - S7 Resin
Mhed Ricid Plastk
LtDPE Film Plastic
z7
Metal
Residual
100.00%Total
Subtoul Due {Costl to Citv s554.21 Subtobl Due (Cost) to City {se,330.8e)
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE
A. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect at all times during the term of the contract, at its sole cost and expense, policies of insurance as set forth herein:
1. General Liability:
a. General liability insurance including, but not limited to, protection for claims of bodily injury and property damage liability, personal and advertising injury liability and product and completed operations liability.
b. Coverage shall be at least as broad as lnsurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage form CG 0001 (occurrence).
c. Claims-made coverage is not acceptable
d. The limits of liability shall not be less than:
Each occurrence: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000)
Products & Completed Operations: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Personal & Advertising lnjury: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) e. lf a general aggregate limit of liability is used, the minimum general aggregate shall be twice the 'each occurrence' limit or the policy shall contain an endorsement stating that the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the project that is the subject of the contract. f. lf a products and completed operations aggregate limit of liability is used, the minimum products and completed operation aggregate shall be twice the 'each occurrence' limit or the policy shall contain an endorsement stating that the products and completed operations aggregate limit shall apply separately to the project which is the subject of the contract. g. lf the Contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
2. Automobile Liability:
a. Automobile liability insurance providing protection against claims of bodily injury and property damage arising out of ownership, operation, maintenance, or use of owned, hired, and non- owned automobiles.
20 Recycling lndustries Commercial Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
b. Coverage shall be at least as broad as lnsurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage form CA 0001, symbol 1 (any auto).
c. The limits of liability per accident shall not be less than:
Combined Single Limit One Million Dollars ($1,000,000)
d. lf Automobile Liability coverage, as required above, is provided by the Commercial General Liability form, the General Liability policy shall include an endorsement providing automobile liability as required above.
3. Workers' Compensation
a. Workers' Compensation lnsurance, with coverage as required by the State of California (unless the Contractor is a qualified self-insurer with the State of California), and Employer's Liability coverage.
b. Employer's Liability Coverage with a limit not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
c. Contractor shall sign and file with the City department responsible for this Agreement/Contract the Worker's Compensation Certificate contained in the Project Manual.
4. lnsurance Required in the Supplementary Conditions: Contractor shall be required to comply with all conditions as stipulated in the Standard Construction Specifications, any supplementary conditions and any special provisions as applicable.
5. INTENTIONALLY DELETED
6. Other lnsurance Provisions:
a. The Contractor's General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
i. The City, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered and specifically named as additional insureds on a separate endorsement as respects liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor, products and completed operations of the Contractor, premises owned, occupied, or used by the Contractor, or automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Contractor in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. ii. The Endorsement requirement may be satisfied with express provisions in the insurance policy(ies) which identifies any person or entity required to be included as an insured under the policy. A copy of the declarations page identifying the policy number, and pertinent provisions in the policy providing additional insured coverage shall be provided to the City. iii. The policy shall contain no special limitations on the scope of coverage afforded to the City, its officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
2t
Recycling I ndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
b. For any claims related to the project, the Contractor's General Liability and Automobile insurance coverage shall be primary insurance in their coverage of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers, and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies on the part of the Contractor, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
d. The Contractor's Workers Compensation and Employer's Liability policies shall contain an endorsement that waives any rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
e. Each insurance policy shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits, non-renewed, or materially changed except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail has been given to the City. Ten days prior written notice by certified mail shall be given to the City in the event of cancellation due to nonpayment of premium.
7. Acceptability of lnsurers: lnsurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:Vll.
8. The Contractor shall furnish the City with Certificates of lnsurance and endorsements or insurance binders, signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, evidencing the coverage required by this section, the Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and/or any Supplementary Conditions. The Contractor shall furnish complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including original endorsements specifically required hereunder if requested.
9. The Contractor shall report, by telephone to the Project Manager within 24 hours, and also report in writing to the City within 48 hours, after Contractor or any Subcontractors or agents have knowledge of, any accident or occurrence involving death of or serious injury to any person or persons, or damage in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) to property of the City or others, arising out of any work done by or on behalf of the Contractor as part of the contract.
10. Such report shall contain:
a. the date and time of the occurrence,
b. the names and addresses of all persons involved, and c. a description of the accident or occurrence and the nature and extent of the injury or damage
11. The City, at its discretion, may increase the amounts and types of insurance coverage required hereunder at any time during the term of the contract by giving 30 days written notice 22 Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
12. lf the Contractor fails to procure or maintain insurance as required by this section, the Standard Specifications, and any Supplementary Conditions, or fails to furnish the City with proof of such insurance, the City, at its discretion, may procure any or all such insurance.
Premiums for such insurance procured by the City shall be deducted and retained from any sums due the Contractor under the contract.
13. Failure of the City to obtain such insurance shall in no way relieve the Contractor from any of its responsibilities under the contract.
14. The making of progress payments to the Contractor shall not be construed as relieving the Contractor or its Subcontractors of responsibility for loss or direct physical loss, damage, or destruction occurring prior to final acceptance by the City.
15. The failure of the City to enforce in a timely manner any of the provisions of this section shall not act as a waiver to enforcement of any of these provisions at any time during the term of the contract.
16. ln the event Contractor carries Excess Liability Coverage, the Excess Liability Coverage shall apply to any and all claims related to the project on a primary and non-contributory basis, and the City's insurance or self-insurance coverage shall be excess to the Contractor's Excess Liability Coverage.
23 Recycling lndustries Commerciol Recycling Processing Agreement
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
BOND NO. 0781254
PREMIUM: $677.00
KNOW ALL MEN BY TIIESE PRESENTS THAT WE, Recycling lndustries, lnc. as Principal, and HARCO NATTONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a cor?oration duly organized and doing business under and by the virtue of the laws of the State of lllinois, and duly licensed hr the purpose of making. guaranteeing or becoming sole surety upon bonds or undertakings required or authorized by the laws of the said State, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto
City of Folsom
(l lereinafter called the Obligee)
in the sum of Fifty Thousand and 00/100
Dollars ($ 50'000.00 )
hr the payment whereof well and truly to be made we and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
TllE CONDITION OF TllE ABOVE OBLICATION lS SUCH TIIAT, wlIEREAS, fte above bounden PRINCIPAL entered into a written Agreement dated July 1 2020
-,
(a copy of which Agreement is or may be
attached hereto, and is hereby refened to and made a part hcreof), with the said Obligee to do and perform the following, to wit:
Commercial Recyclable Material Purchase, Diversion and Processing Services L This bond shall have the term beginning Julv 1,2020 and ending Julv 1.2021 but may be continued by cerrificate at lhe oplion of the Surety. Neither cancellation or flon-rcfl€wal by the Surety, nor failure, nof inability of the Principal to file a ref lacement bond sfialt constitute a loss to the Obligee recov6rable unddr'this bond. '
2. ln the event of default by the Principal in the perlormance of the Agreement during the term of this bond, the Surety shall be liable only for damages incuned by Obligee up to termination date of this bond.
3. No claim shall be had or maintained against the Surcty on this instrument untess such be brought or instituted and process served upon the Surety prior to expiration date of the bond; no suit shall be maintained against the Surely untess it be brought within one year from the termination or cxpiralion date of the bond.
4. If any conflict or inconsistency exists belween the Surety's obligations or undertakings as described in this bond and as described in the underlying document, then the terms otthis bond shall prevail.
5. The aggregate tiability of the surety is limited to lhe penal sum stated herein regardless of the number or amount of claims brought against this bond and regardless of the number of years this bond remains in force.
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
6. This bond shallnot bind the surety untess the bond is accepted by thc Obligee. lf the Obligee objects lo any language conrained herein, within 30 days of the date this bond is signed and sealed by the Surety, Obligee shall return this bond, cerlified mail or express courier, to the Surety al its address at:
I larco National lnsurance Company
Attenlion : Dorothy O'Connor
2999 Qak Rd., Suite 820
Walnul Creek. CA 94597
Failure to r€turn the bond as described above shall constitute Obligee's acceptance of the terms and conditions, herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall welland truly perform the work contracted lo be performed under said Agreement, then this obtigation lo be null and void, olherwise to remain in full force and effect. No right of action shall accrue under this bond to or lor the use olany person olher than the said Obligee.
SICNED AND SEN LED TIIIS 6th day of JulY 2020
llarco National I Company
Altorney-itt-Fact
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSU R.ANCE COMPANY
Member companies of IAT lnsurance Group, Headquartered: 702 Oberlin Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of lllinois, and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and having their principal offices located respectively in the cities of Rolling Meadows, lllinois and Newark, New Jersey, do hereby constitute and appoint
MYRNA SMITH
Pismo Beach. CA
their true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fac1 to execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety, any and all bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, which are or may be allowed, required or permitted by law, statute, rule, regulation, contract or othenivise, and the execution of such instrument(s) in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon the said HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIOELITY INSURANCE COi/iPANY, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by their regularly elec{ed officers at their principal offices.
This Power of Attorney is executed, and may be revoked, pursuant to and by authority of the By-Laws of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELIW INSURANCE COMPANY and is granted under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly held on the 13th day of December, 201E and by the Board of Directors of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY at a meoting held on the 13th day of December, 2018, 'RESOLVED, that (1) the Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Vice President, or Secretary of the Corporation shall have the power to appoint, and to revoke the appointments of, Attorneys-in-Fact or agents with power and authority as defined or limited in their respectiv€ powers of attorney, and to execute on behalf of the Corporation and affix the Corporation's seal thereto, bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and olher written obligations in the nature thereof or related thereto; and (2) any such Officers of the Corporation may appoint and revoke the appointments of joint-control custodians, agents for acceptance of process, and Attorneys-in-fact with authority to execute waivers and consents on behalf of the Corporalion; and (3) the signature of any such Officer of the Corporation and the Corporation's seal may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or eertification given for the execution of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, contract of indemnity or other written obligation in the nature thereof or related thereto, such signature and seals when so used whether heretofore or hereaf,er, being hereby adopted by the Corporation as the original signalure of such officer and the original seal of the Corporation, to be valid and binding upon the Corporation with the same force and effeci as though manually affixed."
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, HARCO NATIONAL INSUMNCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY have each executed and attested these presents on this 3'lst day of December, 2018
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
County of Essex
lN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand on this day,
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Gounty of Cook ::a$;*?-?i,;..
ifr SenL ,gl
'i#te-$
Executive Vice President, Harco National lnsurance Company and lnternational Fidelity lnsuranco Company
Onthis 31st dayof December,20j8 ,boforemecametheindividual whoexecutedtheprecedinginskument,tomepersonallyknown,and, being by me duly sworn, said he is the therein described and authorized officer of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COIIIPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seals affixed to said instrument are the Corporate Seals of said Companies; that the said Corporate Seals and his signature were duly affixed by order of the Boards of Directors of said Companies. lN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Newark, New Jersey the day and year first above written.
t
A.
My Commission Expires April 4,2023
CERTIFICATION
l, the undersigned ofiicer of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELIW INSURANCE COMPANY do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of the Power of Attorney and affidavit, and the copy of the Sections of the By-Laws of said Companies as set forth in said Power of Attorney, with the originals on file in the home office of said companies, and that the same are correct transcripts thereof, and of the whole of the said originals, and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and is now in full force and effect. fr
J"5 v,LoZ,2
t@
$tAt
lgx
A01 399
lrene Martins Assistant SecretarvPage 140
06/09/2026 Item No.7.
A notary public or olher ofllcer.conpleting this certilicate verifles only tho uentity ol the indivitlual who signed tredoatment to which this corlificate ls attached, and not the truthfulnss, accutacy, or validity of thai dod/ment.
GALIFORI|IA ALL.PURPOSC AeKilOWtlDCnEltT cNtL coDE s ltsg:$ca/i*ccg State of California
ol San Luis Obispo I
On lo.Lo b€fore me, Christina Doherlv , Notarv Public
Date Here lnsert Name and Titla ol the Officer
personally appeared Mvrna Smith __
Name(s) ol Signe(s)
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of Califomia that the foregoing paragraph
is true and conecl.
who proved to me on lhe basis of salisfactory. evidence to be il.rg.perconS) whose namefi) is/lffisubscdbed to the withln instrurnent and acknowlgqgeq..lg,me thatfl#she-46*Y uie"uteO'-rne same inIll(lhdrlffi*)Qulhorized capacity{O6fi and that Oy)OflfrierAl$f signaturelg on the inslrument the personfi],or th€ entity upon behalf ol which the persoffii acted, executei the insirument. tt
@.,:ffiq,i;;i',f,f,,,i,',,,
WITNESS hand and officialsaal.
Signalure
ol Public
OPTIONAL
Place Notaty Sg€jl Above
Thottgh this sec'bn is optional, completing this inlormation can deter alteration ol the documenl orlnudulent reattachment of this torm to an unintended document- Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date; Number of Pagos:
Signe(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Gtaimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Signer's Name
t
tr
tr
El lndividual
0Trustee
Corporate Oflicer - Tiile(s):
Partner - tr Limited lJ General
[! Atlorney in Fact
E Guardian or Conservator
Oflicer - Title(s):
O Limiled E Generat
13 Allorney in Fact
El Guardian or Conservator
E Corporate
lJ Partner -tr lndividual
E Trustee
tr Other: E OthenSigner ls Represenling Signer ls Bepresenting:
62015 National Notary Association . unrw.NationalNotary .org . 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) ttem {tS907