Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Foster City City Council
April 18, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
April 18, 2022
Body
Foster City City Council
Pages
21
Original file
16.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on fostercity.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

CITY OF FOSTER CITY/

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

THIS MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953 (AS AMENDED BY AB 361) WHICH AUTHORIZES TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS UNDER THE BROWN ACT DURING CERTAIN PROCLAIMED STATES OF EMERGENCY. THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PROCLAIMED A STATE OF EMERGENCY RELATED TO COVID-19 ON MARCH 4, 2020. THIS TELECONFERENCED MEETING IS NECESSARY SO THAT THE CITY CAN CONDUCT ESSENTIAL BUSINESS AND IS PERMITTED UNDER GOVER NMENT CODE 54953 IN ORDER TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY OF ATTENDEES. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY-ORG.ZOOM.US/J/89156007725 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

Consistent with Government Code Section 54953, this City/District Meeting will be held via teleconference in addition to in person. City Councilmembers/District Board and staff will attend in person or via teleconference.

To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can observe the meeting from home or attend the meeting in person. Below is information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting.

To Attend the Meeting in Person:
• Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404

To Provide Public Comment in Person:
• Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the s taff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non- agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.

To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
• To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercity-org.zoom.us/j/89156007725

• To dial-in via phone:
1-669-900-6833 or
1-408-638-0968
And enter Webinar ID: 891 5600 7725

To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
• During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dial-in attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.

Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda
• Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) 1 Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.

AGENDA

Monday, April 18, 2022 6:30 PM

REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF DIRECTORS

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL

Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Jon Froomin, Sanjay Gehani, Sam Hindi, Patrick Sullivan, and Mayor/President Richa Awasthi

4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

4.1. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2022 as Arab American Heritage Month

4.2. Presentation from OneShoreline, San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District

5. PUBLIC

Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda. Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.

2 6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR

All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on thes
e items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member
so requests. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.

6.1. City/EMID Minutes

6.1.1. City/EMID Special Meeting of March 28, 2022

6.1.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting of April 4, 2022

6.2. City/EMID Resolutions for Adoption (First City Resolution Number to be used tonight is 2022-37 and EMID Resolution Number to be used tonight is 3644)

6.2.1. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorizing the Call for Bids for the Street Rehabilitation Project Fiscal Year 2020- 2021 (CIP 301-697)
a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

6.2.2. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Adopting a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Funded by SB 1: the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

6.2.3. a) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Extending the Proclamation of the Existence of a Local
Emergency Caused by the Threat of the Novel Covid-19 Virus, and Proclaiming the Continuing Need for the City Council, Planning Commission and Committees to Meet by
Teleconference and Allowing for Increased Meeting Accessibility via in Person and Teleconference Meeting Participation; and b) A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Proclaiming the Continuing Need for the Estero Municipal Improvement District Board of Directors, Planning Commission, and Committees to Meet by
Teleconference and Allowing for Increased Meeting Accessibility via in Person and Teleconference Meeting Participation
3 c) Staff Report
d) Adopt Resolutions

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS

7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Proposed Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 2022-2023
a) Open Public Hearing
b) Staff Report
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Services Charges Schedule for FY 2022-2023
f) Action - A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Services Charges Schedule for FY 2022-2023

8. REPORTS

8.1. Levee Protection Planning & Improvements Project (CIP 327-657) Monthly Update
a) Staff Report
b) Action - By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report

9. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION

9.1. An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 Et Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action -
i) Introduce Ordinance by title, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion pass ordinance to second reading

10. RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION

10.1. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Issuance of a Request for Proposals for a Climate Action Plan (CAP) Outreach Services and CEQA Review for the Final Draft of the Climate Action Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action - Adopt Resolution

10.2. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Providing Direction Regarding Operational Aspects of the Workforce Housing 4 Project and Approving Amended Revenues and Expenditures Budget for the Remainder of FY 2021-2022 for the Workforce Housing Fund (Fund 139)
a) Staff Report
b) Action - Adopt Resolution

11. COMMUNICATIONS

11.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 31, 2022, April 5, 2022, and ACH were Processed on April 5, 2022 a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required

12. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS

AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS

City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.

13. CLOSED SESSION

13.1. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation- Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9:
(One potential case)

13.2. Report Out from Closed Session

14. ADJOURNMENT

The public is invited to attend.

Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 286-3250 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.

City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:

LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctv-live-stream:

STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings on-demand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
5 Proclamation

Proclamation
of the City of Foster City, California

Recognizing April 2022 as Arab American Heritage Month

WHEREAS, Arab American Heritage Month is a nationwide celebration and observance that honors the achievements of Arab Americans and recognizes their significant cultural and economic contributions; and

WHEREAS, since the early days of our country’s inception, Arab Americans have been making valuable contributions to virtually every aspect of American society in medicine, law, business, education, technology, government, military service, and culture; and

WHEREAS, since migrating to America, men and women of Arab descent have shared their rich culture and traditions with neighbors and friends; and

WHEREAS, they brought with them to America their resilient family values, strong work and diligent ethic, dedication to education, and diversity in faith and creed that have added strength to our great democracy; and

WHEREAS, Arab Americans have also enriched our society by sharing in the entrepreneurial American spirit that makes our nation free and prosperous; and

WHEREAS, Arab Americans join all Americans in the desire to see a peaceful and diverse society, where every individual is treated equally and feels safe; and

WHEREAS, Arab American issues such as civil rights abuse, harmful stereotyping, bullying, prejudice, and discrimination must be addressed through education and awareness; and

WHEREAS, the incredible contributions and heritage of Arab Americans have helped build a better nation, state, and city , and have consistently contributed to our quality of life, economy, and vitality.

NOW, THEREFORE, I RICHA AWASTHI, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY do hereby recognize April 2022 as Arab Heritage Month and encourage all citizens to celebrate the diversity and history of Arab American communities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and have caused the official seal of the City
of Foster City to be affixed this 18 th of April, two
thousand twenty-two, A.D.

RICHA AWASTHI, MAYOR

6 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 28, 2022

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER OF CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The duly called and noticed special meeting of the City Council of the City of Foster City (City), sitting as said Council and as ex officio the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) of March 28, 2022 was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor/President Awasthi.

Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, as amended through Order N- 08-21, the meeting was held as a hybrid meeting.

ROLL CALL
The Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary called the roll:

PRESENT: Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Jon Froomin, Sanjay Gehani, Sam Hindi, Patrick Sullivan, and Mayor/President Richa Awasthi.

ABSENT: None.

STAFF PRESENT: Kevin Miller, Interim City/District Manager, Benjamin Stock, City Attorney/District Legal Counsel; Jennifer Phan, Interim Deputy City Manager; Edmund Suen, Finance Director; Marlene Subhashini, Community Development Director; Maria Saguisag-Sid, Human Resources Director; Tracy Avelar, Police Chief; Robert Marshall, Fire Marshal; Rob Lasky, IT Manager; Marty Cooper, Chief Building Inspector; Laura Galli, Engineering Manager; Tiffany Oren, Recreation Manager; Yelena Cappello, Deputy City Clerk; Julie Paping, Interim Principal Management Analyst; ‘Andra Lorenz, Senior Management Analyst; Shuli Chen, Video Technician and Priscilla Schaus, Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary.

PUBLIC
Evan Adams addressed the City Council via email.

STUDY SESSION
Mayor/President Awasthi recessed the meeting into Study Session for the following:
7 1. Policy Direction Regarding Preparation of Budget and Five-Year Financial Plan

2. Capital Improvement Funds
a. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program - FY 2022-2023 to FY 2026-2027 b. Long-Term Capital Improvement Project Funding - City Capital Investment Fund - FY 2022-2023 to FY 2036-2037
c. Long-Term Capital Improvement Project Funding - Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds - FY 2022-2023 to FY 2036-2037

3. Enterprise Funds
a. Review of Projected Water Rates for FY 2022-2023; Policy Direction for Rate Notification Under Proposition 218
b. Review of Projected Wastewater Rates for FY 2022-2023 to FY 2026-2027; Policy Direction for Rate Notification Under Proposition 218

4. Internal Service Funds
a. Internal Service Funds Summary
b. Vehicle Replacement Fund
c. Equipment Replacement Fund
d. Self-Insurance Fund
e. Information Technology Fund
f. Building Maintenance Fund
g. Compensated Absences
h. Longevity Recognition Benefits Plan and Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) Benefits Plan Internal Service Funds

5. Updates to Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 2022-2023

6. Special Reports
a. Project Recommendations from the Community Beautification Subcommittee
b. Community Benefits Fund
Motion by Councilmember/Director Gehani, seconded by Councilmember/Director Hindi, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, Minute Order No. 1849 was adopted as follows:

1. Proceed to include the proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Program – FY 2022-2023 to FY 2026-2027 in the FY 2022-2023 budget as presented, adjusted, and recommended;

2. Proceed with the Long-Term Capital Improvement Projects Program and Funding Plan - City Capital Investment Fund - FY 2022-2023 to FY 2036-2037 as presented; but maintain a $10 million placeholder in the City Capital Investment Fund/CIP Fund Balance for Levee CIP project cost overrun contingency;

3. Proceed with the Long-Term Capital Improvement Projects Program and Funding Plan - Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds - FY 2022-2023 to FY 2036-2037 as presented;

4. Proceed with the water rate adoption that reflect increases of 5.0% for fixed charges and 3% for variable charges for residential, irrigation and fire line customers.

Proceed with distribution of Proposition 218 notice based on the Board of Directors’ direction regarding water rates;

5. Proceed with continuing the rolling 5-year wastewater rate increases, including the previously approved increases of 14.25% per year from FY 2021-2022 through FY 2022-2023 and 10.00% for FY 2023-2024, and adding an increase of 2.0% for FY 2024-2025. Proceed with distribution of Proposition 218 notice based on the Board 8 of Directors’ direction regarding an informational reminder that there is a 14.25% wastewater rates increase for FY 2022-2023;

6. Proceed with preparing the Vehicle Replacement Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;

7. Proceed with preparing the Equipment Replacement Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;

8. Proceed with preparing the Self Insurance Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;

9. Proceed with preparing the Information Technology Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;

10.Proceed with preparing the Building Maintenance Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;

11.Proceed with preparing the Compensated Absences Fund based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report and proceed to evaluate IRC Section 115 irrevocable trust options;

12.Proceed with preparing the Longevity Recognition Benefits Plan and Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) Benefits Plan based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report and proceed to evaluate IRC Section 115 irrevocable trust options;

13.Receive and accept the report on Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule as part of the FY 2022-2023 budget and proceed with the 4% increase in most fees as part of cost recovery for increases in personnel costs and services and supplies costs that support the provision of services and proceed with adjustments and amendments contained in the staff report; and

14.Proceed with appropriating $520,000 from the Community Benefits Fund to be included in the FY 2022-2023 budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report.

Meeting recessed into study session at 6:32 p.m. and reconvened at 8:50 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION
Mayor/President Awasthi recessed the meeting into Closed Session for:

1. Public Employee Appointment (Government Code §54957) Title: City/District Manager;

2. Conference with Labor Negotiator (Government Code §54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Mayor/President
Unrepresented Employee: City/District Manager; and

3. Report Out from Closed Session.

Meeting recessed into closed session at 8:50 p.m. and reconvened at 9:05 p.m.

City Attorney/District Legal Counsel Stock reported that the City Council met in closed session and had two reportable actions:

1. The City Council/EMID Board of Directors appointed Finance Director Suen as Interim City/District Manager, 5-0-0; and
9 2. The City Council/EMID Board of Directors requested for City Attorney/District Legal Counsel Stock to prepare an employment agreement for review at the April 4, 2022 City Council meeting, 5-0-0.

ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no objection from the City Council/EMID Board, Mayor/President Awasthi adjourned the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
10 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 4, 2022

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER OF CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Regular Meeting of April 4, 2022 of the City Council of the City of Foster City, sitting as said Council and as ex officio the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID), was called to order at 6:31 p.m. by Mayor/President Richa Awasthi.

Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, as amended through Order N-08-21, the meeting was held as a hybrid meeting.

ROLL CALL
The Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary called the roll:

PRESENT: Councilmembers/ex officio Directors Jon Froomin, Sanjay Gehani, Sam Hindi, Patrick Sullivan, and Mayor/President Richa Awasthi.

ABSENT: None.

STAFF PRESENT: Kevin Miller, Interim City/District Manager, Denise Bazzano, Assistant City Attorney/District Legal Counsel; Jennifer Phan, Interim Deputy City Manager; Edmund Suen, Finance Director; Marlene Subhashini, Community Development Director; Maria Saguisag-Sid, Human Resources Director; Tracy Avelar, Police Chief; Kent Thrasher, Fire Chief; Robert Marshall, Fire Marshal; Cory Call, Police Captain; Mark Lee, Police Lieutenant; William Sandri, Police Lieutenant; Louis Sun, Public Works Director; Rob Lasky, IT Manager; Yelena Cappello, Deputy City Clerk; Julie Paping, Interim Principal Management Analyst; Francine Magno, Senior Engineer; Kevin Ortiz, Management Coordinator; Shuli Chen, Video Technician and Priscilla Schaus, Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary.

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER KEVIN M. MILLER.

Mayor Awasthi presented the proclamation in recognition of Interim City Manager Kevin M. Miller to Kevin Miller.
11 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF APRIL 10-16, 2022 AS "NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEEK"
Vice Mayor Froomin presented the proclamation declaring the Week of April 10-16, 2022 as "National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week" to Dispatcher Adrienne Salas.

PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF APRIL 17-23, 2022 AS "VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION WEEK".

Councilmember Hindi presented the proclamation declaring the Week of April 17-23, 2022 as "Volunteer Appreciation Week" to Emergency Service Volunteer Charlie Bogert.

PRESENTATION BY FIRE CHIEF KENT THRASHER ON SAN MATEO
CONSOLIDATED FIRE DEPARTMENT (SMC FIRE).

Fire Chief Ken Thrasher gave a presentation on the San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department (SMC Fire).

PUBLIC
Doris Duncan addressed the City Council via email.

ITEM REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR/AGENDA
LETTER IN SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 1814 (GRAYSON) - TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATORS.

Communications Director/City Clerk Schaus announced that “By Minute Order, Approve a Letter in Support of Assembly Bill 1814 (Grayson) - Transportation Electrification:

Community Choice Aggregators” has been removed from the agenda and tabled until further notice because AB 1814 has been pulled from consideration for this year.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember/Director Sullivan, seconded by Councilmember/Director Gehani, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, approving the following items on the City/District Consent Calendar:

City/EMID Consent Calendar

1. Minutes of Special Meeting of March 15, 2022;

2. Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 21, 2022;

3. City Resolution No. 2022-30, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Award of Construction Contract to First Serve Productions Inc. for the Construction of (CIP 301–701) Sport Court Resurfacing Project and to 12 Appropriate Additional Funding in the Amount of $15,000, From General Fund CIP 301 to Fully Fund Construction;”

4. City Resolution No. 2022-31, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Grant of Easement by and Between the City of Foster City and Gilead Sciences, Inc for Public Pedestrian Access, Sidewalk, and Stormwater Treatment Purposes Located at 1165, 1167, 1169, 1175. 1181, 1185, 1191, 1159, 1161, and 1163 Chess Drive (APNS 094-010-500 and 094-010-510);”

5. City Resolution No. 2022-32, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City in Support of the Wyland Foundation's 2022 Mayor’s Challenge for Water Conservation;”

6. EMID Resolution No. 3638, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving an Amendment to the Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement Between the City and County of San Francisco and Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County;”

7. EMID Resolution No. 3639, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving a Minimum Purchase Transfer from the City of Mountain View to the City of East Palo Alto;” and

8. EMID Resolution No. 3640, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing (1) Contract Change Order No. Four in the Amount of $105,000 to the Agreement With EPS, Inc. dba Express Plumbing for the Construction of CIP 405–636; and (2) the Purchase of Emergency Bypass Piping for a Not to Exceed Amount of $125,000.”

REPORTS
REPORT ON MINIMUM WAGE NEXT STEPS. MINUTE ORDER NO.1850.

Councilmember Gehani recused himself due to a conflict of interest because he owns a business within Foster City.

Councilmember Gehani left the room from 7:07 p.m. to 7:46 p.m.

Interim Deputy City Manager Phan presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember Hindi, seconded by Councilmember Sullivan, and carried by roll call vote, 3-0-1, Vice Mayor Froomin abstained, adopting Minute Order No. 1850, directing staff to:

1. Prepare an ordinance to add a new chapter to the Foster City Municipal Code providing minimum wage of $15.75/hour, starting as soon as feasible to carry through end of 2022; and
13 2. And to increase minimum wage to $16.50/hour starting January 1, 2023, with increases on January 1 thereafter based on the Regional Consumer Price Index capped at 3%.

REPORT ON BUSINESS LICENSE TAX ORDINANCE REVISION AND POTENTIAL NOVEMBER 8, 2022 ELECTION BALLOT MEASURE. MINUTE ORDER NO. 1851.

Finance Director Suen presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember Gehani, seconded by Councilmember Hindi, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, adopting Minute Order No. 1851, directing staff to:

1. Receive and accept the report on a potential revenue enhancement measure to increase the City’s Business License Tax (BLT) gross receipts cap; and

2. Proceed with increasing the Business License Tax gross receipts cap for a potential ballot measure for the November 8, 2022 election.

RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF FOSTER CITY AND

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO FOR DISPOSABLE FOOD SERVICE WARE ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 4.107 OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE) EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-33.

Interim Principal Management Analyst Paping presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember Hindi, seconded by Councilmember Gehani, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2022-33, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Foster City and County of San Mateo for Disposable Food Service Ware Ordinance (Chapter 4.107 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code) Education and Enforcement Activities.”
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. THREE (3) IN THE AMOUNT OF $400,000 WITH

SCHAAF & WHEELER CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS FOR PHASE III SERVICES

FOR THE LEVEE PROTECTION PLANNING AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 327-657). CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-34.

Public Works Director Sun presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.
14 Motion by Councilmember Sullivan, seconded by Councilmember Froomin, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2022-34, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Contract Amendment No. Three (3) in the Amount of $400,000 With Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers for Phase III Services for the Levee Protection Planning and Improvements Project (CIP 327-657).”

CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND THE CALIFORNIA

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND A FINANCING AGREEMENT

WITH THE SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY IN

CONNECTION WITH THE FINANCING OF THE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM,

ESTABLISHING ONE OR MORE PLEDGED SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR REPAYMENT OF FUNDING. EMID RESOLUTION NO. 3641.

Finance Director Suen presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Director Hindi, seconded by Director Gehani, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, adopting EMID Resolution No. 3641, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing a Construction Loan Agreement with the San Mateo-Foster City Public Financing Authority, the City of San Mateo and the California State Water Resources Control Board and a Financing Agreement With the San Mateo-Foster City Public Financing Authority in Connection with the Financing of the Clean Water Program, Establishing One or More Pledged Sources of Revenue for Repayment of Funding, and Taking Certain Other Actions Relating Thereto.”
AMENDED PAY PLANS FOR THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-35. EMID RESOLUTION NO. 3642.

Human Resources Director Saguisag-Sid presented the staff report.

Motion by Councilmember/Director Gehani, seconded by Councilmember/Director Froomin, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2022-35, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving and Adopting the Amended Pay Plan Effective April 16, 2022” and EMID Resolution No. 3642, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving and Adopting the Amended Pay Plan Effective April 16, 2022.” APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-36. EMID RESOLUTION NO. 3643.

Assistant City Attorney Bazzano presented the staff report. 15 Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember/Director Sullivan, seconded by Councilmember/Director Gehani, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2022-36, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Appointing Edmund Suen as Interim City Manager and Approving Employment Agreement for Interim City/District Manager Services Between the City of Foster City and Edmund Suen” and EMID Resolution No. 3643, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Appointing Edmund Suen as Interim District Manager and Approving Employment Agreement for Interim City/District Manager Services Between the City of Foster City and Edmund Suen.”

COMMUNICATIONS
CITY/DISTRICT WARRANT OF DEMANDS. NO ACTION TAKEN.

City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 15, 2022, and ACH were Processed on March 18, 2022.

COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS,

AND CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS
Interim City/District Manager Miller expressed his appreciation for the reception and the proclamation. He stated he valued the opportunity he was given to come back as the Interim City Manager and enjoyed reconnecting with the City Council and employees. He complimented City Attorney Stock and Assistant City Attorney Bazzano. He also thanked the City Council for the opportunity to serve the community he loves.

Councilmember/Director Sullivan thanked Interim City Manager Miller for coming back and stated he looks forward to Finance Director Suen’s leadership as Interim City Manager.

Councilmember/Director Gehani spoke about the importance of individuals leading an organization and what they demonstrate through their actions, and thanked the entire organization for stepping up, especially during a pandemic.

Councilmember/Director Hindi thanked Interim City Manager Miller for his dedication to the community and his excellent leadership and also thanked his wife for allowing him to come back to help. He thanked Finance Director Suen for stepping up as Interim City Manager and stated he looks forward to working with him. He stated he attended the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) meeting on March 23. In recognition of first day of Ramadan on April 2, he wished everyone a “Ramadan Kareem” and “Ramadan Mubarak”.
16 Vice Mayor/Vice President Froomin thanked Interim City Manager Miller and Finance Director Suen for stepping him. He requested to agendize campaign finance funding and also consideration of two-year budgeting.

Mayor/President Awasthi thanked Interim City Manager Miller for the learning opportunity she received while working with him. She stated that the City is in a much better position now and is confident that Finance Director Suen as Interim City Manager will continue to provide stability, and also maintain and enhance the culture of excellence in governance.

ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no objection from the City Council/EMID Board, Mayor/President Awasthi adjourned the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 9:06 p.m.
17 DATE: April 18, 2022

TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council

VIA: Edmund Suen, Interim City Manager

FROM: Louis Sun, Public Works Director

SUBJECT: STREET REHABILIATION PROJECT (CIP 301-697) –

APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND

AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Plans and Specifications and authorizing the call for bids for the Street Rehabilitation Project FY 2020-2021 (CIP 301-697).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CIP 301-697 consists of street rehabilitation and pavement maintenance on various streets in Neighborhood No. 1 and No. 8. The rehabilitation project will help to increase and maintain the City’s overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is a numerical index used to indicate the general condition of a pavement. Foster City's current PCI rating is 79, or "Very Good" condition, the highest-ranking level. Design for the project was performed in-house by Public Works staff.

Existing funding of $1,500,000 is provided by a combination of Measure A, Measure M, Gas Tax, and SB1 is available in the approved budget for construction. The City Council action will allow staff to advertise the project for bidding. Construction is anticipated to take approximately 3 months.

18 BACKGROUND
In 2021, the pavement condition survey was performed for a majority of the streets in the City and the data was entered into the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Pavement Management Program (PMP). The PMP allows the City to compare and analyze the street conditions. Based on the PMP analysis, combined with the input received from the public and the City’s maintenance crew, streets are identified and prioritized for work.

The scope of work includes but is not limited to slurry, full-width grinding, asphalt overlays, striping, and utility adjustments. The upgrade of the existing non-compliant curb ramps, in conformance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), are also included. Striping plans have been reviewed by Traffic Review Committee and will add to better visibility for all modes of transportation.

ANALYSIS
The ongoing maintenance of the public streets is essential to maintain the integrity of the City’s roadways and maintain an acceptable Pavement Condition Index for our city. Continual improvements and maintenance lead to higher quality roadways at a lower cost. The locations and type of treatments to be performed as part of CIP 301-697 are listed below:

Street Rehabilitation (including Base Repairs, Asphalt Milling, and Asphalt Overlay):
Boothbay Avenue from Galveston Street to Port Royal Avenue Bounty Drive from Foster City Boulevard to Comet Drive (Additional Alternate)
Dolphin Isle
Preventative Maintenance (including Crack Sealing, Base Repairs, and Slurry Seal):
Boothbay Avenue from Edgewater Boulevard to Galveston Street Chesapeake Avenue from Boothbay Avenue to Biscayne Avenue Edgewater Boulevard from Beach Park Boulevard to Baffin Street Nantucket Street from Chesapeake Avenue to Biscayne Avenue 19 Port Royal Avenue from Edgewater Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard
Shell Boulevard from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Catamaran Street Constitution Drive from Lurline Drive to Comet Drive
All locations identified above include striping and signage improvements, utility adjustments if necessary, and the retrofitting of existing non-compliant curb ramps in conformance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Plans and specifications for CIP 301-697 are complete and ready for bidding.

Public Works staff prepared the plans and specifications in-house resulting in time and cost savings. Construction is anticipated to begin in August 2022 and will take approximately 3 months to complete. The overall project management and daily inspection will also be provided by a combination of in-house staff and consultant support. The project schedule is as follows:

Approval of Plans and Specifications
& Authorization to Call for Bids
April 18, 2022
Bid Opening May 24, 2022
Award of Contract June 20, 2022
Contract Execution and Construction July - November 2022 Project Notice of Completion November 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
CIP 301-697 has an approved balance of $1,500,000 that was funded by Measure A, Measure M, Gas Tax and SB1. Based on the Engineer’s Estimate, adequate funding is available for construction of the project. An additional street will be included as alternative bid option to maximize the project construction budget. If based on the Contractor’s bid prices, there is a remaining construction budget available, these additional streets will be included in the construction contract.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREAS
This item is in alignment with the “Facilities and Infrastructure” value/priority area. Street rehabilitation projects continue to improve traffic operations, safety and accessibility for everyone.
20 Attachments:
Attachment 1 – Resolution
Link to Plans and Specifications - https://www.fostercity.org/CIP301- 697-Plans-Specs
21 RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY

APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT FISCAL YEAR 2020- 2021(CIP 301-697)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, Plans and Specifications for the Street Rehabilitation Project Fiscal Year 2020-2021 (CIP 301-697) have been completed and are ready for bid; and WHEREAS, funding in the amount of $1,500,000 provided by a combination of Measure A, Measure M, Gas Tax, and SB1 is available in the approved project budget for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for CIP 301-697 which involves pavement maintenance improvements in Neighborhoods No. 1 and No. 8; and
WHEREAS, based on the Engineer’s Estimate, adequate funding is available in CIP 301-697 to fully fund construction with an option for an additional alternate.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby approve the plans and specifications and authorize the call for bids for the Street Rehabilitation Project Fiscal Year 2020-2021 (CIP 301-697).

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 18th day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RICHA AWASTHI, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
22 DATE: April 18, 2022

TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council

VIA: Edmund Suen, Interim City Manager

FROM: Louis Sun, Public Works Director

SUBJECT: ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution adopting one (1) project, Traffic Signal System Upgrades (FY 2020-2021) Project, for FY 2022- 2023 funding by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1) and reaffirming three previous projects; Traffic Signals at Various Locations (CIP 301-681), Dynamic Signage for the Traffic Relief Pilot Program (CIP 301-694), and FY 2020-2021 Street Rehabilitation (CIP 301- 697) utilizing SB 1 funding.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SB 1 helps agencies with supplemental funding to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs of the local street system. The FY 2022-2023 SB 1 funds may be used toward new projects and projects earmarked to receive SB 1 funding in previous years. To satisfy the requirements for receiving SB 1 funding, it is necessary to pass a resolution adopting the projects which will utilize this funding. It is therefore recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving one new (1) project, Traffic Signal System Upgrades (FY2020-2021) Project, for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 funding by SB 1, and reaffirming three previous projects:
23 Traffic Signals at Various Locations (CIP 301-681), Dynamic Signage for the Traffic Relief Pilot Program (CIP 301-694), and FY 2020-2021 Street Rehabilitation (CIP 301-697), utilizing SB 1 funding.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
SB 1 was filed with the Secretary of State on April 28, 2017. This bill established a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) in the State Transportation Fund to be used to address deferred maintenance on the state highway system and the local street systems. Annual SB 1 funding amounts are determined by its sources: increases per gallon fuel excise taxes, increases in diesel fuel sales taxes and registration fees, and inflationary tax rate adjustments in future years.

SB 1 provides a supplemental funding source to be used to support road maintenance projects, assisting the City with funding to maintain its roadways in “Very Good” condition, the highest-ranking level, with a Pavement Condition Index rating of 79.

Foster City has received SB 1 funding in previous years as follows:
$194,683.76 for FY 2017-2018, $614,146.22 for FY 2018-2019, $583,558.48 for FY 2019-2020, $612,539.90 for FY 2020-2021, and $280,029.35 as of February 2022 for FY 2021-2022. The State Department of Finance estimates Foster City/EMID’s FY 2022-2023 revenues will be $680,240 (Attachment 2). Unexpended RMRA funds may be carried over to subsequent fiscal years.

Staff is recommending the inclusion of one new project and the reaffirmation of three previous projects for utilization of SB 1 funding for FY 2022-2023:

1.CIP 301-698 Traffic Signal System Upgrades (New Project):

The City’s traffic signal system was evaluated as part of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Intersection Evaluation Study (CIP 301-664). This part of the study focused on evaluation of the existing traffic signal infrastructure network and identifies various equipment enhancements which include the following required upgrades: (1) Citywide communications upgrade; (2) Traffic signal field hardware replacements (cabinets, traffic signal and pedestrian heads and push button signals); (3) Traffic Signal controllers replacement; and (4) Central computer system upgrade.
24 2.CIP 301-681 Traffic Signals at Various Locations (Previous Project):

The City’s traffic signal system was evaluated as part of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Intersection Evaluation Study (CIP 301-664). This part of the study focused on inventory of the existing traffic signal infrastructure network and identifies opportunities to improve efficiency through either equipment or operations enhancements. This project is built upon recommendations from CIP 301-664 as well as input received from the City Council. The scope of work includes the installation of new traffic signal systems at four intersections.

3.CIP 301-694 Dynamic Signage for Traffic Relief Pilot Program (Previous Project):

This project is a traffic calming project to address evening commute traffic traveling from US 101 to Route 92 via eastbound East Hillsdale Boulevard. Included is the installation of dynamic signage at the intersections of East Hillsdale Boulevard/Edgewater Boulevard and East Hillsdale Boulevard/Shell Boulevard, which activate during the commute hours when left turns are not permitted, as a permanent solution to minimize cut-through traffic

4.Street Rehabilitation Project (FY 20/21) (CIP 301-697) (Previous Project):

Street rehabilitation, including pavement grinding, base repair, asphalt overlay, slurry seal, thermoplastic pavement striping and pavement markings, signage improvements, updated access ramps, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair and adjusting utility covers to grade.

Approving the attached resolution will satisfy SB 1 requirements, ensuring compliance with the following Streets and Highways Code:
2034.
(a) (1) Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 2032 from the Controller in a fiscal year, an eligible city or county shall submit to the commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. All projects proposed to receive funding shall be adopted by resolution by the applicable city council or county board of supervisors at a regular public meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the resolution allows the City to continue to receive SB 1 funding, 25 estimated at $680,240 for FY 2022-2023, to supplement predetermined road maintenance projects.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREAS
This item is in alignment with the “Facilities and Infrastructure” Value/Priority Area. SB-1 funding supplements road maintenance projects necessary for Foster City to maintain a standard of excellence with regards to street infrastructure.

Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues 26 RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $680,240 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2022-2023 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the sixth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects and safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging infrastructure, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and into the future; and
WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads network is rated with a Pavement 27 Condition Index of 79, “Very Good” condition (the highest-ranking category), and this revenue will help us maintain or increase the overall quality of our road system; and

WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby acknowledge and approve:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following newly proposed project will be funded in-part with Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Revenues:

CIP 301-689 Traffic Signal System Upgrades
a. Anticipated funding sources: (SB 1 ($1,550,000); Measure W ($1,900,000); City CIP ($6,000,000);
b. Project Description: The City’s traffic signal system was evaluated as part of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Intersection Evaluation Study (CIP 301-664). This part of the study focused on evaluation of the existing traffic signal infrastructure network and identifies various equipment enhancements which include the following required upgrades: (1) Citywide communications upgrade; (2) Traffic signal field hardware replacements (cabinets, traffic signal and pedestrian heads and push button signals); (3) Traffic Signal controllers replacement; and (4) Central computer system upgrade;
c. Project Location: 24 signalized intersections throughout Foster City; d. Estimated Project Schedule: Phased upgrades beginning in August 2022 – July 2026;
e. Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 – 50 years (individual components of the traffic signal system vary).

3. The following previously proposed and adopted projects may also utilize Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery. With the relisting of this project in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund this project with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
28 CIP 301-681 Traffic Signals at Various Locations
a. Associated with Foster City Resolution 2021-77;
b. Project Description: The City’s traffic signal system was evaluated as part of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Intersection Evaluation Study (CIP 301-664). This part of the study focused on inventory of the existing traffic signal infrastructure network and identifies opportunities to improve efficiency through either equipment or operations enhancements. This project is built upon recommendations from CIP 301-664 as well as input received from the City Council. The scope of work includes the installation of new traffic signal systems at various intersections;
c. Project Location: E. Hillsdale Blvd./Beach Park Blvd. & Gull Ave.; Foster City Blvd. & Polynesia Dr.; Beach Park Blvd. & Shell Blvd.; Edgewater Blvd. & Port Royal Ave. (north end);
d. Estimated Project Schedule: May 2022 – December 2022; e. Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 – 50 years (individual components of the traffic signal system vary).

CIP 301-694 Dynamic Signage for Traffic Relief Pilot Program a. Associated with City of Foster City Resolution 2021-77; b. Project Description: This project is a traffic calming project to address evening commute traffic traveling from US 101 to Route 92 via eastbound East Hillsdale Boulevard. Included is the installation of dynamic signage at the intersections of East Hillsdale Boulevard/Edgewater Boulevard and East Hillsdale Boulevard/Shell Boulevard, which activate during the commute hours when left turns are not permitted, as a permanent solution to minimize cut- through traffic.
c. Project Location: E. Hillsdale Blvd. & Edgewater Blvd., E. Hillsdale Blvd. & Shell Blvd.;
d. Estimated Project Schedule: Construction – January 2022 – March 2022; e. Estimated Project Useful Life: 12 -25 years.
29 Street Rehabilitation (FY 2020/2021) (CIP 301-697)
a. Associated with City of Foster City Resolution 2020-29; b. Project Description: street rehabilitation, including pavement grinding, base repair, asphalt overlay, slurry seal, thermoplastic pavement striping and pavement markings, updated access ramps, curb and gutter repair, grading, drainage improvements, and adjusting utility covers to grade; c. Project Location: Shell Boulevard from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Catamaran Street; Dolphin Isle; Constitution Drive; Bounty Drive; Various Neighborhood 8 streets;
d. Estimated Project Schedule: June 2022 - December 2022 e. Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 to 20 years.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 18th day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RICHA AWASTHI, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
30 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Updated January 20, 2022
The California Local Government Finance Almanac
Shared Revenue Estimates: State Revenue Allocations to Cities and Counties Local Streets and Roads Estimates: 2020-21, 2021-22
Including Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
The state of California imposes per-gallon excise taxes on gaso line and diesel fuel, sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and registration taxes on motor vehicles with allocations dedicated to transportation purposes.1 The local (city and county) portions of these allocations flow thro ugh the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), the familiar gasoline tax revenues that have been in place for decades, and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which allocates mu ch of the revenue from the Roa d Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall).

State taxes transferred to and allocated through the state Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) include:
• The per gallon “gasoline tax” and “diesel fuel tax” imposed on the use of vehicle fuels. • T
he “use fuel tax,” imposed on vendors and users of motor vehicle fuels that are not taxed under either the gasoline or diesel fuel tax, such as liquefied petroleum gas, ethanol, methanol and natural gas (both liquid and gaseous) for use on state highways. Use Fuel Tax rates vary depending on the type of fuel. • Variab
le rate per gallon gasoline diesel fuel excise taxes impo sed in 2010-11 in a complicated arrangement known as the “fuel tax swap.” This rate replaced the previous Proposition 42 sales tax on gasoline.

T
ransportation taxes allocated to cities and counties through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) include:
• An additional 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excis e tax effective November 1, 2017 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
• An additional 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with half of the revenues going to the state Trade Corridor Enhancem ent Account (TCEA) and half to th e RM
RA. Annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020. • An additional vehicle registration tax called the “Transportati on Improvement Fee” with rates based on the value of the motor vehicle effective January 1, 2018 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
• An additional $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emissions v ehicles of model year 2020 or later effective July 1, 2020 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2021.

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) also adopted annual inflationary adjustments beginning July 1, 2020 to all per-gallon motor vehicle fuel excise taxes including the rates allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA).
1 Taxes on aircraft jet fuel are transferred to the state Aeronautics Account. 2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis, CA • 95616-6616 • Tel 530.758.3952 Attachment 2
31

Page 2 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2103-2108 “HUTA” Cities and counties receive revenue from the motor vehicle fuel taxes imposed pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7360(a) and (b) through the Highway User Tax Account under the following formulas outlined in the Streets and Highways code and illustrated in Figure 1.

Section 2104. Section 2104 allocates funds to counties with designated allotm ents for engineering and administration, snow removal, heavy rainfall / storm damage as well as county streets, roads and public mass transit guideways and facilities.

Section 2105. Section 2105(a) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in e xcess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among counties based on population.

Section 2105(b) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in e x c e s s o f 9 c e n t s p e r g a l l o n ( i . e . t h e Proposition 111 rate) monthly among cities based on population.

Section 2106. Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon are allocated as follows:
a. $7.2 million per year to the State Bicycle Transportation Account. b. $400 per month to each city ($2,308,800 per year among the 481 eligible cities2) c. $800 per month to each county ($556,800 per year among the 58 counties) d. The residual amount to each county and the cities in that county based on registered vehicles. In each county, from this amount, the county receives an allotment base d on the share of assessed value of t h e c ou n t y w h i c h i s i n t h e u n i n c or p or a t e d a r e a . T h e r e ma i n d e r is allocated to the cities within the county based on population.

2 The city of Rolling Hills has only private streets and is therefor not eligible to receive these allocations. 32

Page 3 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Section 2107. This section provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as follows. a. Each city with snow removal costs in excess of $5,000 is allocated 50 percent of the cost exceeding $5,000.
b. The remainder is allocated to cities based on population.

Section 2107.5. These funds (about $2.7 million per year) are allocated to cities annually in July based on population as follows:

Section 2107.5 funds must be used for engineering costs and adm inistrative expenses related to city streets. Cities with populations under 10,000 may also expend the moneys for street construction or acquisition of street rights-of-way.

Section 2103 HUTA and the 2010 Gasoline Sales Tax – Excise Tax Swap In March 2010 as a part of a special budget session called by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Legislature enacted a swap of state sales taxes on gasoline for a gasoline excise t ax. Intended to be “revenue neutral,” the fuel tax swap provided the Legislature with greater flexibility in the use of funds, in particular relieving the general fund from the cost of state transportation debt service payments. The fuel tax swap:

1. Repealed the state sales tax on gasoline (local rates including the Bradley Burns are NOT affected);

2. Increased the excise tax on gasoline by 17.322 cents and added an annual adjustment mechanism intended to ensure the new excise tax provides, over time, the same amount of revenues expected from the sales tax on gas (no more, no less);

3. Increased the sales tax on diesel by 1.75 percent and allocated 75 percent to local transit agencies and 25 percent to state transit programs. The excise tax on diesel was reduced from 18 cents to 13.6 cents.

Sales tax revenues from diesel must go to transit funding.

4. Provided for a specific allocation of the funds among state and local transportation needs.

Revenues from the new Section 2103 excise tax rate are now allocated as follows:

1. State transportation debt service;

2. Remainder allocated:
a. 44 percent to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); b. 12 percent State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP); c. 44 percent evenly split between cities and counties using current HUTA formulas.

Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basi s and to counties 75 percent based on the proportion of registered vehicles and 25 percent based on the proportion of maintained county road miles.

City Population Annual Allocation
over 500,000 $ 20,000
100,000 to 500,000 $ 10,000
50,000 to 99.999 $ 7,500
25,000 to 49,999 $ 6,000
20,000 to 24,999 $ 5,000
15,000 to 19,999 $ 4,000
10,000 to 14,999 $ 3,000
5,000 to 9,999 $ 2,000
less than 5,000 $ 1,000
Streets & Highway Code §2107.5
33

Page 4 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

The law included expressed legislative intent to fully replace the local streets and road funds cities and counties would have received under Proposition 42 state sales tax on gasoline with allocations from the new higher motor vehicle excise tax (HUTA) rate.

However, the swap created certain revenue effects related to the timing and receipt of revenues. In particular, the law provided that the new excise tax rate be adjusted annually by the BOE to garner an amount of revenues equal to what Prop42 would have provided in the prior year. Th us, the annual Sec 2103 funds were always “looking backward.” If the Section 2103 amounts generated less than Prop42 would have, the difference was made up until the following year.

In the years following the swap, there were a number of snafus and changes in interpretation of the Section 2103 allocation. In FY2011-12 SCO allocated more money to citi es and counties and did not fully backfill state transportation programs for weight fees that were used for debt service and loans that those funds would have otherwise received. This was contrary to the Legislature’s inte ntion, but the statute was not clear. The statute was clarified in the 2013 budget to clarify the original intent of the weight fee swap to fully backfill state transportation funds. [Streets & Highways Code 2103 (a)(1)(D)].

The Section 2103 Local Streets and Roads allocation to cities and counties have varied and declined dramatically and, due to BOE’s failure to enact a rate increase in 2018, fel l to $244 million for FY2018-19, about 5 percent down from prior year.

Changes to HUTA Allocated Rates, Including the Variable Rate by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall)
In addition to increasing various fuel and motor vehicle regist ration taxes, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) removed BOE’s discretionary rate settin g role over the Section 2103 variable rate and reset the variable rate at 17.3 cents per gallon on July 1, 2019, up from the current 11.7 cents. This adjustment more than doubled Section 2103 revenue allocations for FY2019-20 over the prior year.

With regard to diesel fuel taxes, SB1 also eliminated the price-based adjustment mechanism applied to the diesel fuel tax rate.

On July 1, 2020, and every July 1 thereafter, the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates including the 18 cent per gallon base rate, the 17.3 percent per gallon rate, the diesel fuel excise tax rate and vehicle registration taxes are increased by the change in the California Consumer Price Index.

Streets & Highways Code Section 2103 Variable Gas Tax Allocations to Cities and Counties

34

Page 5 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Rates effective July 1, 2022
Effective Date Base Rate Sec2103 SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2010 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.353
July 1, 2011 $ 0.180 $ 0.177 $ 0.357
July 1, 2012 $ 0.180 $ 0.180 $ 0.360
July 1, 2013 $ 0.180 $ 0.215 $ 0.395
July 1, 2014 $ 0.180 $ 0.180 $ 0.360
July 1, 2015 $ 0.180 $ 0.120 $ 0.300
July 1, 2016 $ 0.180 $ 0.098 $ 0.278
July 1, 2017 $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.297
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.120 $ 0.417
July 1, 2019 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.120 $ 0.473
July 1, 2020 $ 0.192 $ 0.185 $ 0.128 $ 0.505
July 1, 2021 $ 0.194 $ 0.187 $ 0.130 $ 0.511
July 1, 2022
est $ 0.206 $ 0.198 $ 0.137 $ 0.541
California Gasoline Excise Tax Rates - Per Gallon
Effective Date Base Rate SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2017 $ 0.160 $ 0.160
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2019 $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2020 $ 0.171 $ 0.214 $ 0.385
July 1, 2021 $ 0.173 $ 0.216 $ 0.389
July 1, 2022 est $ 0.183 $ 0.228 $ 0.411
California Diesel Excise Tax Rates
Wt Fees ~$1.7 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C )
56%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(A-B)

51.2%
Str&Hw ys §2108

22.6% (i )
Str&Hw ys §2104

14.6% (i)
Str&Hw ys §2107
Counties (iv)
Cities (v)
State
Highway
Account
Allocation of Gasoline Excise Tax Revenues

54.1¢
Per Gal10.3¢
§2105

10.3¢
§2104, §2106,
§2107,§2108
77% (iii) Str&Hw ys §2105

11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105b

11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105a

11.5% (i),(ii)
Str&Hw ys §2106 Cities and
Counties

19.8¢
§2103
Transportation
Debt Service
(State General
Remainder to...

Wt Fee Offset ~$1.2 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)

13.7¢
§2036
Road
Maint.
and
Rehab.

Account
Rev&Tax §7360(a)
Rev&Tax §7360(b)
Rev&Tax §7360(c)
Highway Users Tax Acount
35

Page 6 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Use of Funds: HUTA
The use of local Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds is restricted by Article XIX of the California State Constitution and by Streets and Highways Code Section 2101. All Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds allocated from the Highway Users Tax Account must be expended for the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their e n v i r o n m e n t a l e f f e c t s , t h e p a y m e n t f o r p r o p e r t y t a k e n o r d a m a g ed for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes. (b) The research and planning for exclusive public mass transi t guideways (and their related fixed facilities), the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
(c) The construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), including the mitigat ion of their environmental ef f e c t s , t h e p a y m e n t f o r p r o p e r t y t a k e n o r damaged for such purposes, the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes, and the maintenance of the structures and the immediate right-of-way for the public mass transit guideways. (d) The payment of principal and interest on voter-approved bo nds issued for the purposes specified above.

Three Year State General Fund TCRF Loan Repayment Funds SB1 stipulated the repayment of $706 million by the state General Fund to transportation funds over three fiscal years: 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. Under SB1, $75 million wa s all ocat ed t o l ocal s tree ts and r oads f rom repayments of Transportation Congestion Relief Funds (TCRF) in each of these three years. These funds were allocated half to cities and half to counties with the city fun ds allocated among cities on a per capita basis, the county funds allocated among counties based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.

These TCRF revenues may be deposited in local HUTA funds.3 However, these TCRF funds carry slightly different use requirements than HUTA funds. TCRF funds may be expended on ly for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction or storm damage repair. For these purposes, • “Maintenance” means patching and/or overlay and sealing. • “Reconstruction” includes any overlay, sealing or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the state minimum standards, but does not include widening for the purpose of traffic capacity.
• “Storm damage repair” is repair or reconstruction of local stre ets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States.

3 Note that the “loan repayment” is between the state general fund and state transportation funds. From an accounting standpoint this is NOT a debt repayment to local agencies, it is simply revenue. 36

Page 7 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2031 “RMRA” The Road Repair and Accountabilit y Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) repr esented a significant additional investment in California’s transportation systems of over $5 billion per year . The Act increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabili zed the problematic price-based fuel tax rates and provided for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act is more than doubling local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUT A) and through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which it established.

The RMRA receives funds4 from the following new taxes imposed under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017:
• A 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017. • A 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017, half of which will be allocated to Trade Corridors Enhancement Account (TCEA) with the remaining half to the RMRA. • A new vehicle registration tax called the “transportation improvement fee,” effective January 1, 2018, based on the market value of the vehicle.
• An additional new $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emission vehicles model year 2020 and later effective July 1, 2020.
• Annual rate increases to these taxes beginning July 1, 2020 (July 1, 2021 for the ZEV fee), and every July 1 thereafter for the change in the California Consumer Price Index. The first adjustment made on July 1, 2020 covered CPI change for two years: November 1, 2017 through November 12, 2019.

4 In addition, funds from a 4 percent increase in the diesel sales tax to 5.75 percent from the prior 1.75 percent effective November 1, 2017 are allocated to the Public Transportation Account.

Effective Date
Vehicle Value Jan 2018 Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022
0 - $4,999 $ 25 $ 27 $ 27 $ 28
$5,000 - $24,999 $ 52 $ 54 $ 55 $ 56
$25,000 - $34,999 $ 105 $ 107 $ 110 $ 112
$35,000 - $59,999 $ 157 $ 161 $ 165 $ 168
$60,000 & over $ 183 $ 188 $ 192 $ 196
SB1 Transportation Improvement Fee
37

Page 8 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

The Road Repair and Accountability Act directs the State Controller to allocate, on a monthly basis, fifty percent of the revenues in the RMRA to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOP) in the State Highway Account and half to cities and counties. But there are a series of specific program allocations, subject to appropriation in the annual state budget, to be taken out first:

1. Administrative costs.

2. $200 million for the State-Local-Partnership Program for existing and aspiring self-help jurisdictions.

3. $100 million annually for the Active Transportation Program for the purpose of encouraging increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.

4. $400 million for state bridge and culvert maintenance and rehabilitation.

5. $25 million for the state’s Freeway Service Patrol program.

6. $5 million for five years through FY 2021-22 for pre-apprenticeship training programs of the California Workforce Development Board.

7. $25 million for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning.

8. $7 million for transportation research and transportation-related workforce education, training, and development including $5 million to the University of California and $2 million to the California State University.

38

Page 9 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Use of Funds: RMRA
[Streets and Highways Code Section 2030]
The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar but, not identical, to HUTA use rules. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, R MRA local streets and roads al l oc a t i on s m u s t b e u s e d f or p r oj e c t s “t h a t include, but are not limited to,” the following
• Road maintenance and rehabilitation
• Safety projects
• Railroad grade separations
• Traffic control devices
• Complete street components, “including active transportation pu rposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capt ure projects in conjunction with any other allowable project.”
RMRA funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement for projects eligible for state or federal funds.

SB1 also contains non-obligatory intent language regarding the use of funds. “To the extent possible and cost effective,” cities and counties are to use a use:
• advanced recycling techniques that reduce greenhouse gas emissions; • automotive technologies, ZEV fueling, infrastructure-to-vehicle; • communications autonomous vehicle systems;
39

Page 10 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

• resiliency re climate change, fires, floods, sea level rise; and • complete street elements, access for bicycles, pedestrians.

If a city or county has an average Pavement Condition Index tha t meets or exceeds 80, the city or county may spend its RMRA funds on transportation priorities other than these. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2037] Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2036] The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states tha t the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new roads funds do not supplant existing levels of city and cou nty general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than average of 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 years. In making this calculation an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with in additional expenditures in the following year.

The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits t o ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not m et its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.

For further guidance, see the State Controller’s “ Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties.”
Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034] The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior t o receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location, schedule, useful life. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034(a)]
The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.

There are no additional use or reporting requirements on Highwa y Users Tax Account funds (Streets and Highways Code Sec 2103-2107) or on the three year transportation loan repayment funds.

Budgeting and Accounting for RMRA Funds: The ~60 Day Delay The allocation of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account ( RMRA) revenues to cities and counties takes many weeks. It takes the State Controller’s Office roughly 30 to 60 days from the time of revenue collection by t h e s t a t e , t h r o u g h t h e v a r i o u s s t a t u t o r y s e t a s i d e s t o d i s t r i b ute the funds to cities and counties in monthly allocations. Consequently, the estimates shown in this report a re for revenues collected for July through June are not received on a cash basis by local agencies until Septem ber through August. That is, for example, the FY2022-23 figure for your agency is revenues collected in and for July 2022 through June 2023 but distributed in 40

Page 11 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

monthly allocations September 2022 through August 2023. Cities and counties thus have two choices in the budgeting and accounting of RMRA revenues:
1) apply a 60 day accrual policy to RMRA funds (recommended); or 2) adjust RMRA budgets (especially in FY2017-18) to reflect a distributed cash basis.

Local Streets and Roads (HUTA and RMRA) Revenue Estimates for FY2021-22 and FY2021-23
We have computed revenue estimates for each city and county using a model reflecting the local allocation formulas, latest population figures used by the State Controller for allocations and estimates by the state Department of Finance (DOF) of statewide HUTA and RMRA tax revenues provided in the Governor’s Proposed 2022-23 Budget (released January 10, 2022) and analyses of SB1(Beall), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fuel consumption was sharply down during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic but has largely recovered to its prior, slightly declining trajectory. Recently, fuel prices have increased steeply but the price of fuel no longer has a direct effect on local streets and roads revenues because all rates are per gallon, regardless of price.

Despite lower fuel consumption, scheduled rate increases stipulated in SB1 have kept local allocations of revenue growing at a modest pace. Total 2019-20 LSR allocations (including HUTA, TCRF, and RMRA) were 4.0 percent above 2018-19. Allocations in 2020-21 were 2.8 percent up from 2019-20. For the current year FY2021-22, the Department of Finance currently projects total LSR allocations to cities and counties will be

14.8 percent above the prior year. For the budget year FY2022-23, DOF estimates total local streets and roads allocations will grow 10.8 percent.
41

Page 12 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

 Governor’s Proposal to Suspend the Annual Fuel Tax Rate Adjustments In his FY 2022-23 Proposed Budget, the Governor floats the idea of a fuel tax increase suspension for 2022.

That is, the fuel tax rate increases that would otherwise occur under SB1 would be suspended for one year.

Because these growth factors are based on computed inflation relative to 2017, if this suspension is for one year, the 2023 adjustment would bring rates up to where they would otherwise have been and the revenue effect would be for one year only.

The revenue figures contained in the Proposed Budget reflect a full funding of state and local transportation programs under HUTA and RMRA. They do NOT reflect this fuel tax suspension. Moreover, both the Governor and Legislature have indicated their commitment to backfill any revenue impact on local streets and roads allocations so as to hold those allocations harmless. Consequently, these estimates reflect those full allocations.

HUTA (Highway Users Tax Account)
Revenues allocated to cities and counties through HUTA under Sections 2103-2107 of the Streets and Highways Code are derived from per gallon rates. As described above, these rates are adjusted annually on July

1. Revenue changes depend on the combined effects of 1) these rate adjustments, 2) taxable gallonage, and 3) the relative change of statutory transfers including the “weight fee offset” that pays state transportation bond debt.

Statewide fuel consumption (gallons) had been relatively flat in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions caused a steep decline in fuel consumption in the spring of 2020. The effects of this are expected to ease up gradually as restrictions are lifted and travel resumes. Sec2104-2108 HUTA allocations (not including RMRA or the sec2103 variable fuel taxes) dropped 6.5 percent in 2019-20 from the prior 2018- 19 year. But this drop-off was more than offset by the doubling of the Sec2103 allocations due to the reset of the formerly price-based rate. FY2019-20 contained the most dramatic fiscal and economic effects of the pandemic, those during the months of April through June 2020.

With a recovery in fuel consumption as the COVID effects begin to ease and with additional rate adjustments kicking in each July 1, DOF estimates total HUTA revenue growth in FY 2021-22 of 18.0 percent and 11.4 percent growth in FY2022-23.

RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account)5
The Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1) taxes that provide funding to cities and counties through the RMRA began on November 1, 2017 when the new per-gallon fuel excise taxes took effect. On January 1, 2018, the new vehicle registration tax, the “Transportation Improvement Fee,” took effect. Cities, counties and other recipients of these revenues saw the first full year of these revenues in FY2018-19. A $100 zero emission vehicle registration tax began on July 1, 2020.

DOF now estimates FY2021-22 RMRA revenues will be 11.0 percent higher than FY2020-21 actuals and that FY2022-23 revenues will grow by 9.5 percent over the current year.

Why does city/county RMRA growth differ from city/county HUTA growth? Under SB1, various fixed-amount statutory allocations are made from the new SB1 tax rates prior to the city and county allocations.

5 Note that RMRA revenues are delayed 60 days from collection to allocation. That is, the revenues for a July 1 to June 30 fisca l year are allocated September 1 through August 31. These are spendable in the fiscal year because your accounting staff “accrues” them back into your fiscal year.
42

Page 13 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
An individual city’s allocations will of course also be affected by change in the city’s population relative to the change in state population. Changes for allocations to counties will be affected other factors in the allocation rules including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.

California Local Streets and Roads Program - State Funds to Cities and Counties

Looking Ahead: Long Term Estimates of Local Streets and Roads Funding Assuming a gradual recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, we can expect stable, modest year over year growth in local streets and roads revenues in future years. While fuel consumption may remain flat overall, annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues.

Due to complicated statutory transfers from these revenues before the city and county allocations are made (including the $1.7 billion transfer for state transportation debt service), actual growth in funding allocated to cities and counties varies somewhat among the various categories of local streets and roads allocations and will not exactly mirror total tax collections. Taking all these factors into account, for the purposes of long-term transportation program planning, we estimate transportation allocations to cities and counties will increase in outyears at the following growth rates:

-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 FY25-26 Millions
§2103
cities&countie s
§2104
counties
§2106
§2107
cities
estimated projected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Road
Maintenance
&
Rehabilitation
AccountTCRF loan
repayment
H.U.T.A.
§2105
cities&counties
Estimated Annual Revenue Growth Rate over prior year
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Beyond
HUTA 2103 1.3% 0.7% 0.8% -0.8% 0.5%
HUTA 2104 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
HUTA 2105 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
HUTA 2106 county 1.7% 2.1% 1.0% 1.3% 1.5%
HUTA 2106 city 2.1% 2.5% 1.3% 1.7% 1.9%
HUTA 2107 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
RMRA 5.0% 5.3% 6.0% 7.2% 5.9%
43

Page 14 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
Allocations to each particular city also will be affected by annual changes in the city’s population relative to the change in state population in cities. The current forecast for California population, provided by the Demographics Unit of the California Department of Finance is as follows:6

If you think your city’s population growth will be significantly different from the statewide average in cities, then you should adjust accordingly. For example, the City of Agartha’s planning department estimates the city will see average annual residential population growth of 1.5 percent annually over the next ten years. The city’s estimated HUTA 2105 allocation for FY2022-23 is $381,200. The long term projection of Section 2105 revenue would be:
$381,200 x Sec2105 growth x Agartha Population Growth ÷ Statewide City Population Growth So, for 2023-24, the city would estimate $381,200 x 1.019 x 1.015 ÷ 1.0057 = $391,149 And long term …

Changes for allocations to counties will be affected by other factors in the allocation rules, including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.

mjgc

ATTACHMENTS:

A) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2021-22 B) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2022-23 C) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2021-22 D) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2022-23

6 See http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/ . California population in cities estimated by author based on recent historic trend of proportion of population in cities.

California 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Population 39,466,855 39,657,243 39,862,922 40,080,241 40,311,181 40,529,241 40,742,869 40,951,365 Population in Cities 33,012,988 33,188,953 33,377,891 33,576,762 33,787,241 33,987,124 34,183,479 34,375,717 percent change 0.53% 0.57% 0.60% 0.63% 0.59% 0.58% 0.56% 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Population 41,153,499 41,350,915 41,539,031 41,717,426 41,886,845 42,047,279 42,198,325 Population in Cities 34,562,797 34,746,091 34,921,744 35,089,387 35,249,638 35,402,476 35,547,550 percent change 0.54% 0.53% 0.51% 0.48% 0.46% 0.43% 0.41% 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 HUTA Sec2015 381,200$
2105 growth 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8%
Agartha pop 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%
Cities pop 0.57% 0.60% 0.63% 0.59% 0.58% 0.56%
HUTA Sec2015 392,035$ 404,640 $ 413,036 $ 423,440 $ 434,792 $ 446,536 $ 44 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 685,902 478,398 269,238 651,953 7,500 2,092,992 1,675,310 3,768,301 ALBANY 157,212 109,651 65,411 149,431 4,000 485,704 383,989 869,693 BERKELEY 990,142 690,596 386,533 941,134 10,000 3,018,406 2,418,412 5,436,818 DUBLIN 548,618 382,646 216,311 521,464 7,500 1,676,539 1,339,995 3,016,535 EMERYVILLE 106,730 74,441 45,948 101,448 3,000 331,567 260,688 592,255 FREMONT 1,986,364 1,385,434 770,610 1,888,048 10,000 6,040,456 4,851,675 10,892,131 HAYWARD 1,340,606 935,036 521,649 1,274,252 10,000 4,081,543 3,274,418 7,355,961 LIVERMORE 773,518 539,508 303,017 735,233 7,500 2,358,776 1,889,311 4,248,087 NEWARK 414,328 288,982 164,537 393,821 6,000 1,267,668 1,011,992 2,279,660 OAKLAND 3,693,191 2,575,898 1,428,649 3,510,395 10,000 11,218,132 9,020,583 20,238,715 PIEDMONT 95,791 66,812 41,731 91,050 3,000 298,383 233,968 532,351 PLEASANTON 664,592 463,534 261,022 631,698 7,500 2,028,346 1,623,259 3,651,605 SAN LEANDRO 740,217 516,281 290,179 703,580 7,500 2,257,756 1,807,973 4,065,730 UNION CITY 617,171 430,460 242,740 586,624 7,500 1,884,495 1,507,435 3,391,930

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,569 1,094 5,604 1,491 1,000 10,758 3,832 14,590 IONE 67,145 46,832 39,206 63,822 2,000 219,005 164,002 383,006 JACKSON 39,441 27,509 25,010 37,489 1,000 130,448 96,334 226,782 PLYMOUTH 8,522 5,944 9,167 8,101 1,000 32,734 20,816 53,550 SUTTER CREEK 21,209 14,792 15,668 20,159 1,000 72,828 51,802 124,630

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 14,645 10,215 10,295 13,920 1,000 50,075 35,770 85,845 CHICO 945,443 659,421 359,540 898,648 10,000 2,873,052 2,309,236 5,182,288 GRIDLEY 55,833 38,942 25,749 53,069 2,000 175,593 136,371 311,964 OROVILLE 151,480 105,653 61,637 143,982 4,000 466,751 369,987 836,738 PARADISE 222,331 155,069 88,221 243,742 6,000 715,363 543,040 1,258,403

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 34,243 23,883 28,138 32,548 1,000 119,811 83,637 203,448

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 53,153 37,073 18,218 50,522 2,000 160,966 129,826 290,792 WILLIAMS 46,530 32,453 16,546 44,227 2,000 141,757 113,649 255,407 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
45 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 956,959 667,453 400,983 909,594 10,000 2,944,989 2,337,364 5,282,353 BRENTWOOD 560,507 390,938 236,851 532,765 7,500 1,728,561 1,369,034 3,097,596 CLAYTON 95,553 66,646 44,359 90,824 3,000 300,383 233,388 533,771 CONCORD 1,096,244 764,600 458,647 1,041,985 10,000 3,371,477 2,677,567 6,049,044 DANVILLE 372,326 259,687 158,944 353,898 6,000 1,150,854 909,403 2,060,257 EL CERRITO 210,696 146,955 92,028 200,267 5,000 654,946 514,623 1,169,569 HERCULES 219,329 152,976 95,602 208,473 6,000 682,379 535,708 1,218,088 LAFAYETTE 215,038 149,983 93,826 204,394 6,000 669,241 525,228 1,194,468 MARTINEZ 312,296 217,818 134,091 296,838 6,000 967,043 762,779 1,729,822 MORAGA 142,635 99,484 63,851 135,575 4,000 445,545 348,384 793,929 OAKLEY 363,753 253,707 155,394 345,749 6,000 1,124,603 888,463 2,013,066 ORINDA 161,783 112,839 71,778 153,775 4,000 504,176 395,153 899,329 PINOLE 164,251 114,560 72,800 156,121 4,000 511,732 401,180 912,912 PITTSBURG 631,748 440,627 266,345 600,480 7,500 1,946,700 1,543,040 3,489,740 PLEASANT HILL 289,450 201,884 124,633 275,124 6,000 897,091 706,980 1,604,070 RICHMOND 933,910 651,377 391,440 887,686 10,000 2,874,414 2,281,067 5,155,481 SAN PABLO 263,230 183,596 113,778 250,201 6,000 816,804 642,937 1,459,741 SAN RAMON 711,164 496,017 299,223 675,965 7,500 2,189,870 1,737,012 3,926,882 WALNUT CREEK 604,773 421,813 255,177 574,840 7,500 1,864,103 1,477,153 3,341,256

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 64,813 45,205 24,714 61,605 2,000 198,337 158,306 356,643

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 92,331 64,398 60,668 87,761 3,000 308,158 225,518 533,676 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 198,417 138,390 124,858 1,233,784 5,000 1,700,449 484,631 2,185,080 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
46 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 1,033,161 720,601 356,479 982,025 10,000 3,102,266 2,523,487 5,625,753 COALINGA 153,379 106,978 57,009 145,788 4,000 467,153 374,627 841,780 FIREBAUGH 68,909 48,062 28,256 65,498 2,000 212,726 168,310 381,035 FOWLER 55,977 39,042 23,854 53,206 2,000 174,080 136,723 310,803 FRESNO 4,636,650 3,233,935 1,583,074 4,407,157 20,000 13,880,815 11,324,973 25,205,788 HURON 62,786 43,792 26,172 59,679 2,000 194,429 153,355 347,784 KERMAN 136,682 95,332 51,325 129,917 4,000 417,256 333,844 751,100 KINGSBURG 110,953 77,387 42,568 105,462 3,000 339,369 271,002 610,372 MENDOTA 105,560 73,625 40,732 100,335 3,000 323,252 257,829 581,081 ORANGE COVE 81,248 56,668 32,456 77,226 2,000 249,598 198,446 448,044 PARLIER 134,223 93,617 50,488 127,579 4,000 409,907 327,837 737,744 REEDLEY 221,220 154,295 80,101 210,270 6,000 671,886 540,327 1,212,213 SANGER 231,955 161,782 83,756 220,475 6,000 703,968 566,549 1,270,517 SAN JOAQUIN 35,150 24,516 16,765 33,410 1,000 110,841 85,853 196,694 SELMA 207,652 144,831 75,483 197,374 5,000 630,339 507,187 1,137,526

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 72,310 50,434 26,576 68,731 2,000 220,050 176,615 396,666 WILLOWS 52,856 36,866 20,718 50,240 2,000 162,680 129,101 291,781

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 146,120 101,915 72,886 138,888 4,000 463,808 356,897 820,705 BLUE LAKE 10,702 7,464 9,787 10,172 1,000 39,125 26,139 65,264 EUREKA 230,582 160,824 112,241 219,169 6,000 728,816 563,194 1,292,010 FERNDALE 11,626 8,109 10,217 11,051 1,000 42,003 28,397 70,400 FORTUNA 101,133 70,538 51,924 96,128 3,000 322,723 247,017 569,740 RIO DELL 28,561 19,920 18,108 27,147 1,000 94,737 69,760 164,496 TRINIDAD 3,112 2,171 6,250 2,958 1,000 15,491 7,601 23,093

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 231,726 161,623 96,437 220,257 6,000 716,044 565,990 1,282,033 CALEXICO 343,316 239,453 140,566 326,323 6,000 1,055,658 838,546 1,894,204 CALIPATRIA 65,339 45,572 30,639 62,105 2,000 205,655 159,590 365,244 EL CENTRO 381,578 266,140 155,697 362,692 6,000 1,172,106 932,000 2,104,106 HOLTVILLE 52,882 36,884 25,712 50,264 2,000 167,742 129,163 296,905 IMPERIAL 172,052 120,002 72,839 163,536 4,000 532,429 420,236 952,665 WESTMORLAND 19,547 13,633 12,530 18,579 1,000 65,289 47,742 113,031

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 33,276 23,209 18,781 31,629 1,000 107,894 81,276 189,170 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
47 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 186,680 130,204 55,550 177,441 5,000 554,875 455,965 1,010,840 BAKERSFIELD 3,369,913 2,350,421 920,920 3,203,118 10,000 9,854,373 8,230,981 18,085,354 CALIFORNIA CITY 119,739 83,514 37,351 113,812 3,000 357,416 292,460 649,877 DELANO 449,792 313,717 127,077 427,529 7,500 1,325,615 1,098,612 2,424,226 MARICOPA 9,786 6,825 7,460 9,302 1,000 34,373 23,902 58,276 MCFARLAND 119,094 83,065 37,176 113,200 3,000 355,535 290,886 646,421 RIDGECREST 250,934 175,019 73,017 238,514 6,000 743,484 612,904 1,356,388 SHAFTER 173,401 120,942 51,939 164,818 5,000 516,100 423,529 939,629 TAFT 79,094 55,166 26,302 75,179 2,000 237,740 193,185 430,925 TEHACHAPI 122,232 85,253 38,029 116,182 3,000 364,696 298,550 663,246 WASCO 227,393 158,600 66,617 216,138 6,000 674,749 555,406 1,230,155

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 131,484 91,706 41,516 124,976 4,000 393,682 321,147 714,829 CORCORAN 210,416 146,759 63,558 200,001 5,000 625,735 513,939 1,139,674 HANFORD 508,643 354,765 146,836 483,468 7,500 1,501,212 1,242,356 2,743,568 LEMOORE 227,342 158,565 68,284 216,090 6,000 676,281 555,281 1,231,563

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 129,321 90,198 48,047 122,920 4,000 394,486 315,866 710,352 LAKEPORT 40,484 28,236 18,338 38,480 1,000 126,539 98,881 225,420

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 152,192 106,150 46,950 227,246 4,000 536,537 371,727 908,265

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 173,477 120,995 72,026 164,891 5,000 536,388 423,716 960,104 ALHAMBRA 731,474 510,183 288,260 695,270 7,500 2,232,687 1,786,619 4,019,305 ARCADIA 488,961 341,037 194,282 464,760 7,500 1,496,539 1,194,283 2,690,822 ARTESIA 140,108 97,721 59,094 133,173 4,000 434,097 342,212 776,308 AVALON 33,691 23,499 17,856 32,024 1,000 108,070 82,291 190,361 AZUSA 420,501 293,288 167,752 399,689 6,000 1,287,230 1,027,071 2,314,301 BALDWIN PARK 643,934 449,126 254,337 612,063 7,500 1,966,960 1,572,804 3,539,764 BELL 307,988 214,813 124,151 292,744 6,000 945,696 752,257 1,697,953 BELLFLOWER 656,850 458,134 259,342 624,338 7,500 2,006,164 1,604,349 3,610,513 BELL GARDENS 358,139 249,792 143,586 340,413 6,000 1,097,929 874,751 1,972,680 BEVERLY HILLS 289,247 201,742 116,889 274,930 6,000 888,808 706,483 1,595,290 BRADBURY 8,887 6,199 8,244 8,447 1,000 32,777 21,707 54,484 BURBANK 881,665 614,937 346,462 838,026 10,000 2,691,090 2,153,458 4,844,547 CALABASAS 206,413 143,968 84,789 196,197 5,000 636,367 504,163 1,140,530 CARSON 777,741 542,453 306,190 739,247 7,500 2,373,131 1,899,626 4,272,757 CERRITOS 424,411 296,015 169,267 403,404 6,000 1,299,097 1,036,619 2,335,716 CLAREMONT 302,798 211,193 122,140 287,811 6,000 929,942 739,581 1,669,523 COMMERCE 108,740 75,843 46,939 103,358 3,000 337,880 265,596 603,476 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
48 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL COMPTON 829,139 578,302 326,107 788,101 7,500 2,529,148 2,025,165 4,554,313 COVINA 414,107 288,828 165,274 393,611 6,000 1,267,821 1,011,453 2,279,275 CUDAHY 201,868 140,797 83,028 191,877 5,000 622,570 493,061 1,115,631 CULVER CITY 337,549 235,431 135,607 320,842 6,000 1,035,430 824,461 1,859,891 DIAMOND BAR 480,964 335,459 191,183 457,159 7,500 1,472,265 1,174,751 2,647,016 DOWNEY 947,835 661,088 372,104 900,921 10,000 2,891,948 2,315,077 5,207,026 DUARTE 181,957 126,910 75,312 172,951 5,000 562,130 444,428 1,006,558 EL MONTE 987,632 688,846 387,526 938,749 10,000 3,012,752 2,412,281 5,425,033 EL SEGUNDO 141,278 98,538 59,548 134,285 4,000 437,649 345,070 782,719 GARDENA 511,722 356,912 203,102 486,394 7,500 1,565,629 1,249,875 2,815,504 GLENDALE 1,728,527 1,205,600 674,637 1,642,973 10,000 5,261,737 4,221,911 9,483,649 GLENDORA 437,063 304,839 174,170 415,430 7,500 1,339,003 1,067,522 2,406,525 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 122,681 85,567 52,341 116,609 3,000 380,198 299,648 679,846 HAWTHORNE 737,758 514,566 290,695 701,242 7,500 2,251,761 1,801,967 4,053,728 HERMOSA BEACH 165,412 115,370 68,900 157,225 4,000 510,908 404,018 914,926 HIDDEN HILLS 16,222 11,315 11,086 15,419 1,000 55,043 39,623 94,666 HUNTINGTON PARK 499,790 348,590 198,478 475,053 7,500 1,529,411 1,220,733 2,750,143 INDUSTRY 3,825 2,667 6,282 3,635 1,000 17,409 9,341 26,751 INGLEWOOD 934,156 651,548 366,803 887,920 10,000 2,850,428 2,281,668 5,132,096 IRWINDALE 12,220 8,523 9,535 11,615 1,000 42,893 29,847 72,740 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 171,688 119,747 71,332 163,190 5,000 530,957 419,345 950,302 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 46,225 32,241 22,713 43,937 2,000 147,115 112,904 260,019 LAKEWOOD 680,255 474,459 268,412 646,585 7,500 2,077,210 1,661,515 3,738,725 LA MIRADA 412,394 287,634 164,611 391,983 6,000 1,262,622 1,007,270 2,269,891 LANCASTER 1,368,446 954,453 535,099 1,300,715 10,000 4,168,713 3,342,417 7,511,131 LA PUENTE 339,941 237,099 136,533 323,115 6,000 1,042,689 830,302 1,872,990 LA VERNE 280,555 195,679 113,520 266,669 6,000 862,423 685,252 1,547,675 LAWNDALE 277,884 193,816 112,485 264,130 6,000 854,314 678,728 1,533,042 LOMITA 173,256 120,842 71,940 164,681 5,000 535,719 423,177 958,896 LONG BEACH 3,966,385 2,766,443 1,541,849 3,770,067 10,000 12,054,744 9,687,857 21,742,601 LOS ANGELES 33,270,219 23,205,055 12,897,640 31,623,497 20,000 101,016,411 81,262,195 182,278,605 LYNWOOD 592,588 413,313 234,439 563,257 7,500 1,811,097 1,447,389 3,258,486 MALIBU 107,231 74,790 46,354 101,923 3,000 333,298 261,910 595,207 MANHATTAN BEACH 297,947 207,810 120,260 283,200 6,000 915,218 727,734 1,642,952 MAYWOOD 234,644 163,657 95,729 223,030 6,000 723,060 573,115 1,296,175 MONROVIA 326,305 227,589 131,249 310,154 6,000 1,001,297 796,996 1,798,293 MONTEBELLO 533,515 372,112 211,547 507,109 7,500 1,631,784 1,303,106 2,934,890 MONTEREY PARK 512,027 357,125 203,220 486,684 7,500 1,566,555 1,250,621 2,817,176 NORWALK 895,063 624,282 351,654 850,762 10,000 2,731,761 2,186,184 4,917,944 PALMDALE 1,323,519 923,118 517,689 1,258,011 10,000 4,032,336 3,232,682 7,265,019 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 113,955 79,481 48,960 108,315 3,000 353,711 278,335 632,045 PARAMOUNT 468,100 326,487 186,198 444,931 7,500 1,433,216 1,143,330 2,576,546 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
49 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL PASADENA 1,232,206 859,429 482,303 1,171,217 10,000 3,755,155 3,009,650 6,764,805 PICO RIVERA 535,576 373,549 212,346 509,067 7,500 1,638,039 1,308,139 2,946,178 POMONA 1,283,196 894,994 502,063 1,219,684 10,000 3,909,937 3,134,195 7,044,131 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 353,136 246,302 141,647 335,657 6,000 1,082,742 862,531 1,945,272 REDONDO BEACH 566,028 394,789 224,147 538,012 7,500 1,730,475 1,382,518 3,112,993 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 68,672 47,897 31,412 65,273 2,000 215,252 167,730 382,982 ROSEMEAD 459,866 320,744 183,007 437,105 7,500 1,408,221 1,123,218 2,531,439 SAN DIMAS 288,348 201,115 116,540 274,076 6,000 886,079 704,287 1,590,366 SAN FERNANDO 209,916 146,410 86,146 199,526 6,000 647,998 512,717 1,160,716 SAN GABRIEL 338,737 236,259 136,067 321,971 6,000 1,039,033 827,361 1,866,394 SAN MARINO 111,488 77,759 48,004 105,969 3,000 346,220 272,307 618,527 SANTA CLARITA 1,878,947 1,310,513 732,927 1,785,948 10,000 5,718,335 4,589,310 10,307,645 SANTA FE SPRINGS 153,735 107,226 64,375 146,126 4,000 475,463 375,497 850,960 SANTA MONICA 788,375 549,870 310,310 749,355 7,500 2,405,410 1,925,600 4,331,010 SIERRA MADRE 92,577 64,570 40,675 87,995 3,000 288,817 226,118 514,935 SIGNAL HILL 98,513 68,710 42,976 93,637 3,000 306,836 240,617 547,453 SOUTH EL MONTE 180,592 125,958 74,783 171,653 5,000 557,985 441,093 999,079 SOUTH GATE 818,777 571,074 322,091 778,251 7,500 2,497,693 1,999,854 4,497,547 SOUTH PASADENA 217,667 151,816 89,150 206,893 6,000 671,526 531,648 1,203,174 TEMPLE CITY 307,191 214,257 123,842 291,986 6,000 943,276 750,310 1,693,586 TORRANCE 1,233,325 860,210 482,737 1,172,281 10,000 3,758,553 3,012,384 6,770,937 VERNON 2,502 1,745 5,769 2,378 1,000 13,394 6,110 19,504 WALNUT 253,003 176,463 102,843 240,481 6,000 778,790 617,957 1,396,747 WEST COVINA 899,719 627,529 353,458 855,187 10,000 2,745,893 2,197,555 4,943,447 WEST HOLLYWOOD 306,343 213,666 123,514 291,180 6,000 940,702 748,239 1,688,941 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 70,130 48,914 31,977 66,659 2,000 219,680 171,292 390,972 WHITTIER 730,948 509,816 288,056 694,770 7,500 2,231,091 1,785,335 4,016,425 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
50 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 158,747 110,722 42,779 150,890 4,000 467,137 387,738 854,875 MADERA 561,143 391,382 139,049 533,369 7,500 1,632,444 1,370,587 3,003,031

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 17,537 12,231 12,414 16,669 1,000 59,851 42,833 102,684 CORTE MADERA 85,047 59,318 41,724 80,837 3,000 269,926 207,726 477,652 FAIRFAX 63,584 44,348 32,406 60,436 2,000 202,774 155,302 358,076 LARKSPUR 103,406 72,123 49,695 98,288 3,000 326,512 252,568 579,080 MILL VALLEY 123,385 86,058 58,370 117,278 3,000 388,091 301,367 689,457 NOVATO 453,565 316,349 201,723 431,116 7,500 1,410,253 1,107,829 2,518,082 ROSS 21,599 15,065 14,177 20,530 1,000 72,370 52,755 125,125 SAN ANSELMO 107,604 75,051 51,518 102,278 3,000 339,450 262,821 602,271 SAN RAFAEL 500,460 349,057 222,083 475,690 7,500 1,554,790 1,222,369 2,777,159 SAUSALITO 62,371 43,502 31,879 59,284 2,000 199,036 152,340 351,377 TIBURON 80,188 55,929 39,615 76,219 2,000 253,950 195,857 449,807

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 62,829 43,821 32,795 59,719 2,000 201,165 153,459 354,624 POINT ARENA 3,808 2,656 6,497 3,619 1,000 17,579 9,300 26,879 UKIAH 136,317 95,077 65,540 129,570 4,000 430,505 332,953 763,459 WILLITS 42,740 29,810 23,844 40,624 2,000 139,017 104,391 243,408

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 269,751 188,144 85,287 256,400 6,000 805,582 658,865 1,464,447 DOS PALOS 47,276 32,974 18,906 44,936 2,000 146,093 115,472 261,565 GUSTINE 49,566 34,571 19,589 47,113 2,000 152,839 121,065 273,904 LIVINGSTON 131,000 91,369 43,887 124,516 4,000 394,773 319,967 714,739 LOS BANOS 363,532 253,554 113,269 345,539 6,000 1,081,894 887,924 1,969,818 MERCED 771,441 538,059 234,979 733,258 7,500 2,285,236 1,884,237 4,169,473

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 24,473 17,070 12,472 24,743 1,000 79,758 59,776 139,534

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 69,825 48,701 59,478 1,918,387 2,000 2,098,390 170,547 2,268,937 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
51 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 34,115 23,795 14,804 32,427 1,000 106,140 83,326 189,467 DEL REY OAKS 14,162 9,877 8,953 13,461 1,000 47,453 34,590 82,042 GONZALES 71,996 50,215 25,911 68,432 2,000 218,555 175,849 394,404 GREENFIELD 156,050 108,841 50,559 148,327 4,000 467,776 381,151 848,928 KING CITY 127,006 88,583 42,042 120,720 3,000 381,351 310,211 691,562 MARINA 185,883 129,648 59,307 176,683 6,000 557,521 454,018 1,011,539 MONTEREY 240,681 167,869 75,375 228,769 6,000 718,694 587,862 1,306,556 PACIFIC GROVE 131,746 91,889 43,432 125,226 4,000 396,294 321,789 718,083 SALINAS 1,358,559 947,557 403,171 1,291,316 10,000 4,010,603 3,318,267 7,328,870 SAND CITY 3,265 2,277 5,757 3,103 1,000 15,403 7,974 23,377 SEASIDE 280,054 195,330 86,921 266,193 6,000 834,498 684,030 1,518,529 SOLEDAD 218,260 152,230 68,801 207,457 6,000 652,748 533,098 1,185,847

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 176,402 123,036 59,637 167,671 5,000 531,747 430,861 962,608 CALISTOGA 45,284 31,584 18,877 43,042 2,000 140,787 110,605 251,392 NAPA 673,292 469,603 214,101 639,968 7,500 2,004,464 1,644,510 3,648,974 SAINT HELENA 51,474 35,902 20,801 48,926 2,000 159,103 125,725 284,828 YOUNTVILLE 24,872 17,348 12,532 23,641 1,000 79,392 60,750 140,142

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 109,054 76,062 104,859 103,656 3,000 396,631 266,363 662,994 NEVADA CITY 26,127 18,223 28,772 24,834 1,000 98,956 63,815 162,771 TRUCKEE 137,487 95,894 130,948 1,740,605 4,000 2,108,934 335,812 2,444,746 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
52 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 422,418 294,625 182,622 401,510 7,500 1,308,675 1,031,752 2,340,426 ANAHEIM 2,997,435 2,090,627 1,266,607 2,849,075 10,000 9,213,744 7,321,205 16,534,949 BREA 382,765 266,968 165,930 363,820 6,000 1,185,483 934,900 2,120,383 BUENA PARK 692,194 482,786 296,188 657,934 7,500 2,136,603 1,690,678 3,827,281 COSTA MESA 956,383 667,050 407,401 909,046 10,000 2,949,880 2,335,956 5,285,836 CYPRESS 411,546 287,042 178,046 391,177 6,000 1,273,811 1,005,198 2,279,009 DANA POINT 282,819 197,258 123,856 268,821 6,000 878,754 690,783 1,569,537 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 469,058 327,155 202,256 445,842 7,500 1,451,811 1,145,670 2,597,482 FULLERTON 1,182,385 824,681 502,539 1,123,862 10,000 3,643,468 2,887,964 6,531,432 GARDEN GROVE 1,462,609 1,020,129 620,503 1,390,217 10,000 4,503,458 3,572,409 8,075,867 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,669,506 1,164,434 707,599 1,586,873 10,000 5,138,412 4,077,752 9,216,164 IRVINE 2,302,883 1,606,197 974,227 2,188,901 10,000 7,082,206 5,624,769 12,706,975 LAGUNA BEACH 192,693 134,398 85,916 183,155 5,000 601,162 470,650 1,071,812 LAGUNA HILLS 263,501 183,785 115,724 250,459 6,000 819,469 643,599 1,463,069 LAGUNA NIGUEL 552,629 385,444 237,436 525,277 7,500 1,708,286 1,349,792 3,058,078 LAGUNA WOODS 137,996 96,249 62,891 131,166 4,000 432,302 337,054 769,357 LA HABRA 532,616 371,485 229,011 506,254 7,500 1,646,867 1,300,911 2,947,778 LAKE FOREST 716,888 500,010 306,583 681,406 7,500 2,212,387 1,750,993 3,963,380 LA PALMA 132,018 92,079 60,374 125,484 4,000 413,955 322,452 736,407 LOS ALAMITOS 97,843 68,243 45,988 93,000 3,000 308,074 238,981 547,055 MISSION VIEJO 798,136 556,678 340,785 758,632 7,500 2,461,731 1,949,440 4,411,170 NEWPORT BEACH 728,141 507,859 311,320 692,102 7,500 2,246,922 1,778,479 4,025,401 ORANGE 1,164,874 812,467 495,168 1,107,218 10,000 3,589,727 2,845,193 6,434,920 PLACENTIA 433,951 302,669 187,477 412,472 7,500 1,344,069 1,059,921 2,403,989 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 408,595 284,984 176,803 388,372 6,000 1,264,754 997,990 2,262,745 SAN CLEMENTE 543,276 378,920 233,499 516,386 7,500 1,679,581 1,326,946 3,006,527 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 303,595 211,749 132,602 288,569 6,000 942,515 741,528 1,684,043 SANTA ANA 2,810,033 1,959,920 1,187,718 2,670,950 10,000 8,638,621 6,863,480 15,502,101 SEAL BEACH 207,278 144,571 92,056 197,019 5,000 645,925 506,276 1,152,200 STANTON 335,582 234,059 146,067 318,972 6,000 1,040,681 819,656 1,860,336 TUSTIN 678,482 473,223 290,415 644,900 7,500 2,094,520 1,657,186 3,751,707 VILLA PARK 49,286 34,376 25,548 46,847 2,000 158,056 120,381 278,437 WESTMINSTER 775,638 540,986 331,314 737,248 7,500 2,392,687 1,894,489 4,287,176 YORBA LINDA 575,339 401,283 246,996 546,862 7,500 1,777,981 1,405,260 3,183,241 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
53 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 122,393 85,366 57,617 116,335 3,000 384,711 298,943 683,654 COLFAX 18,419 12,847 12,748 17,507 1,000 62,521 44,988 107,508 LINCOLN 420,815 293,507 186,397 399,987 6,000 1,306,706 1,027,837 2,334,543 LOOMIS 57,732 40,267 29,714 54,875 2,000 184,588 141,011 325,598 ROCKLIN 597,582 416,797 262,679 568,005 7,500 1,852,563 1,459,589 3,312,152 ROSEVILLE 1,245,511 868,709 542,284 1,183,864 10,000 3,850,367 3,042,148 6,892,516

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 17,842 12,444 8,822 130,509 1,000 170,617 43,579 214,196

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 273,338 190,646 118,764 259,809 6,000 848,558 667,626 1,516,183 BEAUMONT 446,781 311,617 191,079 424,668 7,500 1,381,645 1,091,259 2,472,904 BLYTHE 176,530 123,125 78,401 167,792 5,000 550,848 431,172 982,020 CALIMESA 86,802 60,542 40,991 82,506 2,000 272,841 212,013 484,854 CANYON LAKE 93,493 65,209 43,780 88,865 3,000 294,347 228,355 522,703 CATHEDRAL CITY 457,695 319,230 195,629 435,041 7,500 1,415,095 1,117,916 2,533,011 COACHELLA 405,559 282,867 173,892 385,486 6,000 1,253,804 990,575 2,244,379 CORONA 1,436,982 1,002,255 603,928 1,365,858 10,000 4,419,024 3,509,816 7,928,840 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 255,131 177,947 111,173 242,504 6,000 792,756 623,156 1,415,912 EASTVALE 573,473 399,982 243,901 545,089 7,500 1,769,946 1,400,703 3,170,649 HEMET 716,778 499,933 303,650 681,301 7,500 2,209,162 1,750,724 3,959,886 INDIAN WELLS 46,030 32,105 23,991 43,752 2,000 147,877 112,427 260,305 INDIO 776,953 541,903 328,739 738,497 7,500 2,393,592 1,897,700 4,291,292 JURUPA VALLEY 916,670 639,352 386,992 871,300 10,000 2,824,314 2,238,959 5,063,273 LAKE ELSINORE 549,186 383,042 233,775 522,004 7,500 1,695,508 1,341,383 3,036,891 LA QUINTA 349,778 243,960 150,635 332,465 6,000 1,082,837 854,328 1,937,166 MENIFEE 845,345 589,604 357,254 803,504 7,500 2,603,207 2,064,746 4,667,953 MORENO VALLEY 1,775,948 1,238,674 745,255 1,688,047 10,000 5,457,924 4,337,736 9,795,659 MURRIETA 976,667 681,198 412,007 928,326 10,000 3,008,198 2,385,500 5,393,698 NORCO 229,496 160,067 100,485 218,137 6,000 714,186 560,542 1,274,728 PALM DESERT 457,008 318,750 195,343 434,388 7,500 1,412,990 1,116,238 2,529,228 PALM SPRINGS 404,957 282,447 173,641 384,914 6,000 1,251,959 989,105 2,241,063 PERRIS 669,731 467,119 284,034 636,582 7,500 2,064,966 1,635,811 3,700,777 RANCHO MIRAGE 159,417 111,189 71,266 151,526 4,000 497,399 389,374 886,773 RIVERSIDE 2,750,105 1,918,122 1,151,415 2,613,987 10,000 8,443,629 6,717,105 15,160,733 SAN JACINTO 434,765 303,236 186,069 413,246 7,500 1,344,816 1,061,909 2,406,725 TEMECULA 956,306 666,997 403,518 908,974 10,000 2,945,795 2,335,769 5,281,564 WILDOMAR 313,873 218,918 135,665 298,338 6,000 972,793 766,632 1,739,425 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16 54 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 744,644 519,368 338,535 707,787 7,500 2,317,835 1,818,785 4,136,620 ELK GROVE 1,510,505 1,053,535 681,780 1,435,742 10,000 4,691,561 3,689,393 8,380,954 FOLSOM 697,935 486,791 317,602 663,391 7,500 2,173,219 1,704,701 3,877,919 GALT 221,466 154,466 104,057 210,504 6,000 696,492 540,928 1,237,420 ISLETON 7,055 4,921 7,962 6,706 1,000 27,645 17,233 44,877 RANCHO CORDOVA 675,540 471,170 307,564 642,104 7,500 2,103,877 1,649,999 3,753,876 SACRAMENTO 4,372,945 3,050,008 1,964,672 4,156,504 20,000 13,564,128 10,680,876 24,245,004

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 350,956 244,782 144,788 333,586 6,000 1,080,112 857,207 1,937,320 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 18,241 12,722 12,076 17,338 1,000 61,377 44,553 105,929

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 298,049 207,881 129,903 283,297 6,000 925,131 727,982 1,653,113 APPLE VALLEY 630,493 439,752 269,444 599,287 7,500 1,946,476 1,539,974 3,486,450 BARSTOW 205,260 143,163 90,956 195,101 5,000 639,480 501,346 1,140,826 BIG BEAR LAKE 44,003 30,691 23,270 417,351 2,000 517,315 107,477 624,792 CHINO 747,807 521,574 318,685 710,794 7,500 2,306,360 1,826,511 4,132,871 CHINO HILLS 700,971 488,908 299,026 666,276 7,500 2,162,682 1,712,116 3,874,798 COLTON 459,603 320,560 197,714 436,855 7,500 1,422,232 1,122,576 2,544,808 FONTANA 1,814,261 1,265,397 766,319 1,724,463 10,000 5,580,440 4,431,315 10,011,755 GRAND TERRACE 105,144 73,335 48,933 99,940 3,000 330,353 256,814 587,168 HESPERIA 814,536 568,117 346,694 774,221 7,500 2,511,068 1,989,498 4,500,566 HIGHLAND 466,913 325,659 200,782 443,803 7,500 1,444,657 1,140,430 2,585,087 LOMA LINDA 211,111 147,244 93,412 200,662 5,000 657,430 515,638 1,173,068 MONTCLAIR 335,794 234,207 145,746 319,174 6,000 1,040,921 820,174 1,861,095 NEEDLES 45,394 31,661 23,854 43,147 2,000 146,055 110,874 256,929 ONTARIO 1,543,407 1,076,484 652,631 1,467,016 10,000 4,749,538 3,769,758 8,519,295 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,485,124 1,035,833 628,167 1,411,617 10,000 4,570,740 3,627,401 8,198,141 REDLANDS 603,391 420,849 258,068 573,526 7,500 1,863,334 1,473,777 3,337,111 RIALTO 869,776 606,644 369,880 826,726 10,000 2,683,026 2,124,419 4,807,445 SAN BERNARDINO 1,834,164 1,279,278 774,673 1,743,381 10,000 5,641,496 4,479,927 10,121,423 TWENTYNINE PALMS 254,122 177,243 111,466 241,544 6,000 790,376 620,691 1,411,067 UPLAND 665,796 464,374 284,262 632,842 7,500 2,054,774 1,626,200 3,680,975 VICTORVILLE 1,078,411 752,162 457,453 1,025,035 10,000 3,323,060 2,634,008 5,957,069 YUCAIPA 471,780 329,054 202,826 448,429 7,500 1,459,589 1,152,319 2,611,908 YUCCA VALLEY 189,360 132,073 84,282 179,988 5,000 590,703 462,510 1,053,213 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16 55 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 979,457 683,144 427,740 930,978 10,000 3,031,319 2,392,314 5,423,633 CHULA VISTA 2,327,348 1,623,260 1,009,773 2,212,155 10,000 7,182,536 5,684,525 12,867,060 CORONADO 209,432 146,073 95,235 199,066 5,000 654,807 511,537 1,166,344 DEL MAR 36,108 25,184 20,392 34,321 1,000 117,005 88,194 205,199 EL CAJON 875,508 610,643 382,854 832,175 10,000 2,711,179 2,138,420 4,849,600 ENCINITAS 528,215 368,416 232,889 502,071 7,500 1,639,091 1,290,161 2,929,252 ESCONDIDO 1,286,325 897,176 560,249 1,222,658 10,000 3,976,408 3,141,837 7,118,246 IMPERIAL BEACH 235,526 164,273 106,502 223,868 6,000 736,169 575,269 1,311,438 LA MESA 505,226 352,381 222,962 480,219 7,500 1,568,288 1,234,009 2,802,297 LEMON GROVE 223,408 155,821 101,270 212,350 6,000 698,848 545,671 1,244,518 NATIONAL CITY 532,116 371,136 234,573 505,779 7,500 1,651,104 1,299,689 2,950,793 OCEANSIDE 1,498,887 1,045,432 652,035 1,424,699 10,000 4,631,053 3,661,017 8,292,070 POWAY 414,981 289,438 183,993 394,441 6,000 1,288,853 1,013,587 2,302,440 SAN DIEGO 11,965,672 8,345,724 5,171,702 11,373,426 20,000 36,876,524 29,226,040 66,102,563 SAN MARCOS 816,648 569,589 357,437 776,228 7,500 2,527,402 1,994,655 4,522,057 SANTEE 481,668 335,950 212,789 457,828 7,500 1,495,735 1,176,470 2,672,205 SOLANA BEACH 117,254 81,781 55,431 111,450 3,000 368,917 286,392 655,309 VISTA 875,720 610,791 382,945 832,376 10,000 2,711,832 2,138,938 4,850,770

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 7,420,149 5,175,348 1,941,168 7,052,886 20,000 21,609,551 18,123,643 39,733,194

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 63,609 44,366 29,891 60,461 2,000 200,326 155,364 355,691 LATHROP 241,708 168,584 100,142 229,744 6,000 746,178 590,368 1,336,547 LODI 583,014 406,636 234,772 554,157 7,500 1,786,078 1,424,005 3,210,083 MANTECA 740,472 516,458 296,882 703,822 7,500 2,265,133 1,808,595 4,073,728 RIPON 138,157 96,361 59,297 131,319 4,000 429,134 337,448 766,582 STOCKTON 2,721,052 1,897,858 1,078,130 2,586,372 10,000 8,293,412 6,646,144 14,939,556 TRACY 836,144 583,187 334,620 794,758 7,500 2,556,209 2,042,273 4,598,482

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 148,868 103,831 78,056 141,499 4,000 476,254 363,608 839,862 ATASCADERO 251,205 175,209 128,415 238,772 6,000 799,600 613,566 1,413,167 EL PASO DE ROBLES 263,501 183,785 134,466 250,459 6,000 838,211 643,599 1,481,811 GROVER BEACH 111,564 77,813 59,699 106,042 3,000 358,118 272,494 630,611 MORRO BAY 86,785 60,530 47,506 82,490 3,000 280,311 211,972 492,282 PISMO BEACH 68,756 47,956 38,634 65,353 2,000 222,700 167,937 390,637 SAN LUIS OBISPO 390,575 272,415 196,997 371,244 6,000 1,237,231 953,976 2,191,208 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16 56 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 58,631 40,894 29,447 55,729 2,000 186,701 143,206 329,907 BELMONT 224,468 156,560 99,159 213,357 6,000 699,544 548,260 1,247,804 BRISBANE 38,830 27,083 21,123 36,908 1,000 124,945 94,843 219,787 BURLINGAME 252,248 175,936 110,838 239,763 6,000 784,785 616,114 1,400,899 COLMA 14,068 9,812 10,714 13,372 1,000 48,967 34,362 83,329 DALY CITY 920,927 642,321 391,930 875,346 10,000 2,840,525 2,249,357 5,089,882 EAST PALO ALTO 257,370 179,509 112,991 244,632 6,000 800,501 628,624 1,429,125 FOSTER CITY 278,503 194,248 121,874 264,718 6,000 865,342 680,240 1,545,582 HALF MOON BAY 104,381 72,803 48,679 99,215 3,000 328,078 254,950 583,028 HILLSBOROUGH 96,597 67,373 45,406 91,815 3,000 304,192 235,936 540,128 MENLO PARK 295,319 205,977 128,943 280,702 6,000 916,940 721,313 1,638,253 MILLBRAE 190,878 133,132 85,039 181,430 5,000 595,480 466,218 1,061,697 PACIFICA 321,310 224,105 139,869 305,407 6,000 996,690 784,797 1,781,487 PORTOLA VALLEY 38,669 26,971 21,055 36,755 1,000 124,450 94,449 218,899 REDWOOD CITY 722,350 503,819 308,454 686,597 7,500 2,228,719 1,764,332 3,993,051 SAN BRUNO 381,061 265,779 164,986 362,200 6,000 1,180,026 930,737 2,110,763 SAN CARLOS 252,825 176,338 111,080 240,311 6,000 786,555 617,522 1,404,077 SAN MATEO 873,829 609,472 372,132 830,579 10,000 2,696,011 2,134,319 4,830,330 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 569,310 397,078 244,121 541,132 7,500 1,759,140 1,390,534 3,149,673 WOODSIDE 47,726 33,287 24,863 45,364 2,000 153,239 116,570 269,809

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 46,089 32,146 20,833 43,808 2,000 144,876 112,572 257,449 CARPINTERIA 111,903 78,049 43,727 106,364 3,000 343,044 273,322 616,366 GOLETA 274,237 191,273 100,198 260,664 6,000 832,372 669,821 1,502,193 GUADALUPE 70,775 49,363 29,420 67,272 2,000 218,830 172,867 391,696 LOMPOC 360,344 251,330 130,152 342,508 6,000 1,090,334 880,136 1,970,470 SANTA BARBARA 789,113 550,385 279,307 750,056 7,500 2,376,361 1,927,402 4,303,762 SANTA MARIA 911,141 635,496 321,757 866,044 10,000 2,744,438 2,225,454 4,969,893 SOLVANG 46,742 32,601 21,060 44,429 2,000 146,832 114,167 261,000 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16 57 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 352,203 245,652 145,583 334,770 6,000 1,084,208 860,252 1,944,460 CUPERTINO 497,407 346,928 203,624 472,788 7,500 1,528,246 1,214,912 2,743,159 GILROY 479,964 334,761 196,651 456,208 7,500 1,475,084 1,172,307 2,647,391 LOS ALTOS 258,727 180,455 108,218 245,921 6,000 799,322 631,938 1,431,260 LOS ALTOS HILLS 71,148 49,624 33,239 67,626 2,000 223,637 173,778 397,415 LOS GATOS 261,492 182,383 109,323 248,549 6,000 807,747 638,691 1,446,438 MILPITAS 641,628 447,518 261,272 609,870 7,500 1,967,787 1,567,170 3,534,957 MONTE SERENO 30,562 21,316 17,016 29,049 1,000 98,944 74,648 173,592 MORGAN HILL 401,735 280,199 165,382 381,851 6,000 1,235,167 981,234 2,216,401 MOUNTAIN VIEW 702,269 489,813 285,511 667,510 7,500 2,152,603 1,715,285 3,867,888 PALO ALTO 573,736 400,165 234,134 545,339 7,500 1,760,875 1,401,346 3,162,220 SAN JOSE 8,732,627 6,090,765 3,495,409 8,300,402 20,000 26,639,203 21,329,358 47,968,561 SANTA CLARA 1,108,736 773,312 447,984 1,053,858 10,000 3,393,891 2,708,076 6,101,967 SARATOGA 259,032 180,668 108,340 246,211 6,000 800,252 632,684 1,432,936 SUNNYVALE 1,304,464 909,828 526,221 1,239,899 10,000 3,990,412 3,186,142 7,176,554

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 85,572 59,684 38,515 81,337 3,000 268,109 209,010 477,119 SANTA CRUZ 508,346 354,558 205,087 483,186 7,500 1,558,677 1,241,631 2,800,308 SCOTTS VALLEY 99,683 69,526 44,075 94,749 3,000 311,034 243,475 554,509 WATSONVILLE 435,587 303,810 176,420 414,028 7,500 1,337,346 1,063,918 2,401,264

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 90,754 63,298 53,825 86,262 3,000 297,139 221,665 518,804 REDDING 777,750 542,459 424,938 739,255 7,500 2,491,902 1,899,647 4,391,549 SHASTA LAKE 90,372 63,032 53,619 85,899 3,000 295,922 220,733 516,655

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 6,521 4,548 6,179 22,453 1,000 40,702 15,928 56,630

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 8,404 5,861 8,955 7,988 1,000 32,208 20,526 52,734 DUNSMUIR 13,992 9,759 11,718 39,158 1,000 75,627 34,176 109,802 ETNA 6,301 4,395 7,915 5,989 1,000 25,599 15,389 40,989 FORT JONES 6,021 4,199 7,777 5,723 1,000 24,720 14,706 39,426 MONTAGUE 12,237 8,535 10,850 11,631 1,000 44,253 29,888 74,141 MOUNT SHASTA 28,900 20,157 19,088 95,906 1,000 165,051 70,588 235,639 TULELAKE 8,565 5,974 9,035 8,141 1,000 32,714 20,920 53,634 WEED 25,160 17,549 17,240 23,915 1,000 84,864 61,454 146,318 YREKA 65,848 45,927 37,356 63,255 2,000 214,385 160,833 375,218 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16 58 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 229,903 160,351 107,905 218,524 6,000 722,683 561,537 1,284,220 DIXON 171,272 119,457 81,610 162,795 4,000 539,135 418,330 957,465 FAIRFIELD 1,000,691 697,954 453,579 951,161 10,000 3,113,386 2,444,178 5,557,564 RIO VISTA 85,479 59,619 43,135 81,248 2,000 271,482 208,782 480,264 SUISUN CITY 244,921 170,826 114,640 232,799 6,000 769,186 598,218 1,367,405 VACAVILLE 831,395 579,875 377,655 790,245 7,500 2,586,669 2,030,674 4,617,343 VALLEJO 999,343 697,014 452,975 949,880 10,000 3,109,211 2,440,885 5,550,096

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 77,449 54,018 38,289 73,615 2,000 245,370 189,167 434,538 COTATI 62,998 43,940 32,040 59,880 2,000 200,859 153,873 354,732 HEALDSBURG 100,065 69,792 48,068 95,112 3,000 316,037 244,407 560,445 PETALUMA 518,166 361,407 228,854 492,520 7,500 1,608,447 1,265,617 2,874,063 ROHNERT PARK 360,267 251,277 160,579 342,436 6,000 1,120,559 879,950 2,000,508 SANTA ROSA 1,456,122 1,015,605 634,424 1,384,051 10,000 4,500,201 3,556,564 8,056,765 SEBASTOPOL 64,932 45,288 32,876 61,718 2,000 206,815 158,596 365,410 SONOMA 92,636 64,611 44,856 88,051 3,000 293,155 226,263 519,418 WINDSOR 236,212 164,752 106,938 224,521 6,000 738,423 576,947 1,315,369

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 414,684 289,231 168,982 394,159 6,000 1,273,056 1,012,862 2,285,918 HUGHSON 61,930 43,194 29,319 58,865 2,000 195,309 151,263 346,572 MODESTO 1,859,629 1,297,040 741,067 1,767,586 10,000 5,675,322 4,542,127 10,217,449 NEWMAN 101,439 70,751 44,962 96,418 3,000 316,569 247,763 564,332 OAKDALE 197,051 137,438 82,817 187,298 5,000 609,605 481,296 1,090,901 PATTERSON 197,620 137,834 83,042 187,838 5,000 611,334 482,684 1,094,018 RIVERBANK 213,605 148,983 89,371 203,032 6,000 660,991 521,727 1,182,718 TURLOCK 634,479 442,532 256,004 603,075 7,500 1,943,590 1,549,709 3,493,299 WATERFORD 75,846 52,900 34,829 72,092 2,000 237,667 185,253 422,919

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 79,433 55,402 35,714 75,501 2,000 248,050 194,014 442,064 YUBA CITY 600,186 418,613 238,379 570,479 7,500 1,835,157 1,465,948 3,301,105

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 64,991 45,330 30,986 61,775 2,000 205,081 158,741 363,822 RED BLUFF 121,028 84,413 53,564 115,037 3,000 377,042 295,609 672,651 TEHAMA 3,799 2,650 6,331 3,611 1,000 17,391 9,279 26,670

TRINITY COUNTY
20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16 59 ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 224,866 156,838 87,779 213,736 6,000 689,219 549,233 1,238,452 EXETER 93,255 65,043 39,212 88,640 3,000 289,151 227,775 516,926 FARMERSVILLE 96,054 66,995 40,245 91,300 3,000 297,593 234,610 532,204 LINDSAY 111,004 77,422 45,762 105,510 3,000 342,698 271,127 613,825 PORTERVILLE 505,166 352,340 191,213 480,163 7,500 1,536,382 1,233,864 2,770,247 TULARE 587,211 409,563 221,489 558,147 7,500 1,783,910 1,434,258 3,218,168 VISALIA 1,180,884 823,634 440,562 1,122,436 10,000 3,577,516 2,884,298 6,461,814 WOODLAKE 68,299 47,636 30,003 64,918 2,000 212,856 166,818 379,674

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 41,578 28,999 31,520 39,520 1,000 142,617 101,553 244,170

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 591,129 412,296 259,477 561,871 7,500 1,832,273 1,443,827 3,276,100 FILLMORE 134,045 93,492 62,551 127,410 4,000 421,497 327,402 748,900 MOORPARK 305,122 212,814 136,256 290,019 6,000 950,211 745,256 1,695,467 OJAI 63,270 44,129 32,059 60,138 2,000 201,596 154,536 356,132 OXNARD 1,735,659 1,210,574 752,577 1,649,752 10,000 5,358,562 4,239,331 9,597,892 PORT HUENEME 198,213 138,248 90,197 188,403 5,000 620,061 484,134 1,104,195 SAN BUENAVENTURA 902,560 629,510 393,651 857,887 10,000 2,793,608 2,204,493 4,998,102 SANTA PAULA 260,262 181,525 116,929 247,380 6,000 812,097 635,687 1,447,784 SIMI VALLEY 1,055,498 736,180 459,542 1,003,255 10,000 3,264,476 2,578,043 5,842,519 THOUSAND OAKS 1,074,281 749,281 467,634 1,021,109 10,000 3,322,306 2,623,921 5,946,227

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 587,627 409,853 245,217 558,542 7,500 1,808,739 1,435,273 3,244,012 WEST SACRAMENTO 457,644 319,194 192,037 434,993 7,500 1,411,368 1,117,791 2,529,160 WINTERS 64,601 45,058 31,230 61,404 2,000 204,293 157,788 362,081 WOODLAND 517,098 360,661 216,362 491,504 7,500 1,593,125 1,263,007 2,856,132

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 103,465 72,164 43,155 98,344 3,000 320,129 252,713 572,842 WHEATLAND 30,613 21,352 16,148 29,098 1,000 98,211 74,772 172,983 Statewide Total 280,549,500$ 195,675,500 $ 113,803,593 $ 271,887,500 $ 2,709,500 $ 864,625,593$ 685,239,500 $ 1,549,865,093$ Notes:

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.

4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.

5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16 60 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 796,626 521,851 293,741 712,933 7,500 2,332,651 1,843,723 4,176,374 ALBANY 182,590 119,611 71,027 163,408 4,000 540,636 422,590 963,226 BERKELEY 1,149,978 753,324 421,904 1,029,162 10,000 3,364,368 2,661,527 6,025,896 DUBLIN 637,181 417,402 235,909 570,239 7,500 1,868,231 1,474,701 3,342,931 EMERYVILLE 123,959 81,203 49,761 110,936 3,000 368,860 286,894 655,753 FREMONT 2,307,018 1,511,275 841,569 2,064,644 10,000 6,734,506 5,339,399 12,073,905 HAYWARD 1,557,017 1,019,966 569,539 1,393,438 10,000 4,549,961 3,603,585 8,153,546 LIVERMORE 898,386 588,512 330,650 804,002 7,500 2,629,049 2,079,238 4,708,287 NEWARK 481,212 315,231 179,338 430,656 6,000 1,412,437 1,113,724 2,526,162 OAKLAND 4,289,374 2,809,871 1,560,581 3,838,734 10,000 12,508,560 9,927,394 22,435,955 PIEDMONT 111,254 72,880 45,153 99,566 3,000 331,853 257,488 589,341 PLEASANTON 771,875 505,638 284,764 690,783 7,500 2,260,560 1,786,440 4,047,000 SAN LEANDRO 859,709 563,175 316,621 769,388 7,500 2,516,394 1,989,723 4,506,117 UNION CITY 716,800 469,559 264,787 641,493 7,500 2,100,140 1,658,973 3,759,112

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,822 1,194 5,678 1,631 1,000 11,325 4,217 15,542 IONE 77,984 51,086 42,394 69,791 2,000 243,255 180,488 423,743 JACKSON 45,808 30,008 26,882 40,995 1,000 144,693 106,018 250,711 PLYMOUTH 9,898 6,484 9,572 8,858 1,000 35,812 22,909 58,721 SUTTER CREEK 24,632 16,136 16,674 22,044 1,000 80,487 57,009 137,497

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 17,009 11,142 10,804 15,222 1,000 55,178 39,366 94,544 CHICO 1,098,064 719,317 392,409 982,702 10,000 3,202,492 2,541,377 5,743,869 GRIDLEY 64,846 42,479 27,690 58,033 2,000 195,048 150,080 345,128 OROVILLE 175,933 115,249 66,903 157,449 4,000 519,534 407,181 926,715 PARADISE 258,221 169,155 95,950 263,508 6,000 792,834 597,630 1,390,465

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 39,770 26,053 30,300 35,592 1,000 132,715 92,045 224,760

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 61,733 40,440 19,462 55,248 2,000 178,883 142,877 321,760 WILLIAMS 54,041 35,401 17,635 48,364 2,000 157,441 125,074 282,516 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
61 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 1,111,439 728,078 437,692 994,672 10,000 3,281,882 2,572,332 5,854,213 BRENTWOOD 650,989 426,448 258,352 582,596 7,500 1,925,885 1,506,659 3,432,544 CLAYTON 110,978 72,699 48,025 99,319 3,000 334,022 256,850 590,872 CONCORD 1,273,209 834,050 500,700 1,139,446 10,000 3,757,404 2,946,734 6,704,139 DANVILLE 432,430 283,275 173,226 386,999 6,000 1,281,930 1,000,822 2,282,752 EL CERRITO 244,708 160,303 100,111 218,999 5,000 729,121 566,356 1,295,477 HERCULES 254,734 166,871 104,016 227,972 6,000 759,593 589,561 1,349,154 LAFAYETTE 249,751 163,606 102,075 223,512 6,000 744,944 578,027 1,322,971 MARTINEZ 362,709 237,602 146,071 324,603 6,000 1,076,985 839,459 1,916,444 MORAGA 165,660 108,520 69,323 148,256 4,000 495,759 383,406 879,165 OAKLEY 422,473 276,752 169,348 378,088 6,000 1,252,660 977,777 2,230,437 ORINDA 187,899 123,088 77,984 168,158 4,000 561,130 434,877 996,007 PINOLE 190,765 124,966 79,101 170,723 4,000 569,555 441,510 1,011,065 PITTSBURG 733,730 480,650 290,579 656,645 7,500 2,169,104 1,698,157 3,867,261 PLEASANT HILL 336,176 220,221 135,736 300,857 6,000 998,990 778,050 1,777,040 RICHMOND 1,084,670 710,542 427,266 970,715 10,000 3,203,192 2,510,376 5,713,568 SAN PABLO 305,723 200,272 123,875 273,604 6,000 909,473 707,569 1,617,042 SAN RAMON 825,966 541,071 326,504 739,190 7,500 2,440,232 1,911,629 4,351,861 WALNUT CREEK 702,401 460,127 278,377 628,607 7,500 2,077,011 1,625,647 3,702,657

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 75,276 49,311 26,559 67,367 2,000 220,513 174,220 394,733

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 107,236 70,248 65,844 95,970 3,000 342,298 248,188 590,486 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 230,447 150,960 135,982 1,251,424 5,000 1,773,814 533,349 2,307,163 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
62 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 1,199,942 786,055 389,065 1,073,877 10,000 3,458,939 2,777,165 6,236,103 COALINGA 178,139 116,695 61,846 159,424 4,000 520,103 412,287 932,390 FIREBAUGH 80,033 52,428 30,429 71,625 2,000 236,515 185,229 421,744 FOWLER 65,013 42,589 25,620 58,183 2,000 193,404 150,468 343,872 FRESNO 5,385,134 3,527,678 1,729,315 4,819,374 20,000 15,481,501 12,463,437 27,944,938 HURON 72,922 47,769 28,152 65,261 2,000 216,104 168,772 384,876 KERMAN 158,746 103,991 55,636 142,068 4,000 464,441 367,404 831,846 KINGSBURG 128,864 84,416 46,067 115,326 3,000 377,673 298,245 675,918 MENDOTA 122,600 80,313 44,061 109,720 3,000 359,694 283,748 643,442 ORANGE COVE 94,363 61,815 35,019 84,449 2,000 277,646 218,396 496,042 PARLIER 155,890 102,120 54,722 139,512 4,000 456,243 360,794 817,037 REEDLEY 256,931 168,309 87,079 229,938 6,000 748,256 594,644 1,342,901 SANGER 269,400 176,477 91,071 241,097 6,000 784,045 623,502 1,407,547 SAN JOAQUIN 40,824 26,743 17,873 36,535 1,000 122,975 94,484 217,459 SELMA 241,172 157,986 82,032 215,835 5,000 702,026 558,173 1,260,199

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 83,982 55,015 28,594 75,159 2,000 244,750 194,370 439,120 WILLOWS 61,389 40,214 22,193 54,939 2,000 180,735 142,079 322,814

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 169,708 111,172 79,194 151,879 4,000 515,953 392,775 908,728 BLUE LAKE 12,429 8,142 10,249 11,124 1,000 42,944 28,767 71,711 EUREKA 267,804 175,432 122,196 239,669 6,000 811,101 619,810 1,430,911 FERNDALE 13,503 8,845 10,719 12,084 1,000 46,152 31,251 77,404 FORTUNA 117,459 76,945 56,290 105,119 3,000 358,813 271,849 630,662 RIO DELL 33,171 21,730 19,341 29,686 1,000 104,929 76,772 181,701 TRINIDAD 3,615 2,368 6,385 3,235 1,000 16,602 8,366 24,967

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 269,134 176,303 104,928 240,859 6,000 797,224 622,887 1,420,111 CALEXICO 398,736 261,203 153,146 356,845 6,000 1,175,931 922,842 2,098,773 CALIPATRIA 75,886 49,712 33,033 67,914 2,000 228,545 175,633 404,178 EL CENTRO 443,175 290,314 169,679 396,615 6,000 1,305,783 1,025,691 2,331,474 HOLTVILLE 61,418 40,234 27,650 54,966 2,000 186,268 142,148 328,415 IMPERIAL 199,826 130,902 79,143 178,833 4,000 592,704 462,481 1,055,184 WESTMORLAND 22,702 14,872 13,246 20,317 1,000 72,136 52,542 124,678

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 38,647 25,317 20,076 34,587 1,000 119,628 89,446 209,074 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
63 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 216,816 142,031 60,252 194,037 5,000 618,136 501,802 1,119,938 BAKERSFIELD 3,913,911 2,563,913 1,005,807 3,502,717 10,000 10,996,348 9,058,416 20,054,765 CALIFORNIA CITY 139,068 91,100 40,367 124,457 3,000 397,993 321,861 719,853 DELANO 522,400 342,213 138,407 467,517 7,500 1,478,037 1,209,052 2,687,089 MARICOPA 11,366 7,445 7,707 10,172 1,000 37,690 26,305 63,995 MCFARLAND 138,319 90,610 40,176 123,787 3,000 395,893 320,128 716,021 RIDGECREST 291,442 190,917 79,338 260,823 6,000 828,519 674,517 1,503,036 SHAFTER 201,392 131,927 56,307 180,234 5,000 574,861 466,105 1,040,966 TAFT 91,862 60,176 28,294 82,211 2,000 264,543 212,606 477,149 TEHACHAPI 141,963 92,997 41,108 127,049 3,000 406,117 328,562 734,679 WASCO 264,101 173,006 72,345 236,354 6,000 751,807 611,239 1,363,046

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 152,709 100,036 44,918 136,665 4,000 438,328 353,431 791,759 CORCORAN 244,383 160,090 69,002 218,708 5,000 697,183 565,604 1,262,787 HANFORD 590,752 386,988 159,997 528,688 7,500 1,673,926 1,367,247 3,041,173 LEMOORE 264,042 172,968 74,167 236,302 6,000 753,478 611,102 1,364,580

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 150,197 98,391 52,054 134,417 4,000 439,059 347,619 786,678 LAKEPORT 47,019 30,801 19,593 42,079 1,000 140,492 108,822 249,314

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 176,760 115,791 50,855 240,777 4,000 588,183 409,096 997,279

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 201,481 131,985 78,255 180,313 5,000 597,034 466,310 1,063,345 ALHAMBRA 849,554 556,524 314,525 760,301 7,500 2,488,404 1,966,222 4,454,626 ARCADIA 567,893 372,014 211,839 508,230 7,500 1,667,476 1,314,340 2,981,816 ARTESIA 162,725 106,597 64,125 145,629 4,000 483,077 376,613 859,690 AVALON 39,130 25,633 19,066 35,019 1,000 119,848 90,563 210,411 AZUSA 488,382 319,928 182,851 437,073 6,000 1,434,234 1,130,319 2,564,553 BALDWIN PARK 747,883 489,921 277,458 669,311 7,500 2,192,074 1,730,913 3,922,987 BELL 357,706 234,325 135,210 320,125 6,000 1,053,365 827,879 1,881,245 BELLFLOWER 762,883 499,747 282,927 682,735 7,500 2,235,793 1,765,629 4,001,422 BELL GARDENS 415,953 272,481 156,445 372,253 6,000 1,223,132 962,687 2,185,818 BEVERLY HILLS 335,939 220,066 127,275 300,646 6,000 989,926 777,503 1,767,429 BRADBURY 10,322 6,762 8,563 9,237 1,000 35,884 23,889 59,772 BURBANK 1,023,990 670,792 378,120 916,410 10,000 2,999,312 2,369,938 5,369,250 CALABASAS 239,734 157,044 92,201 214,548 5,000 708,528 554,845 1,263,372 CARSON 903,291 591,725 334,116 808,391 7,500 2,645,023 2,090,590 4,735,612 CERRITOS 492,922 322,902 184,506 441,136 6,000 1,447,467 1,140,827 2,588,294 CLAREMONT 351,678 230,376 133,012 314,731 6,000 1,035,798 813,929 1,849,727 COMMERCE 126,294 82,732 50,843 113,025 3,000 375,894 292,296 668,190 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
64 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL COMPTON 962,985 630,830 355,879 861,814 7,500 2,819,008 2,228,748 5,047,756 COVINA 480,956 315,063 180,144 430,427 6,000 1,412,590 1,113,132 2,525,721 CUDAHY 234,455 153,586 90,276 209,824 5,000 693,141 542,627 1,235,768 CULVER CITY 392,039 256,816 147,727 350,852 6,000 1,153,434 907,342 2,060,775 DIAMOND BAR 558,605 365,930 208,453 499,918 7,500 1,640,406 1,292,845 2,933,251 DOWNEY 1,100,842 721,136 406,138 985,188 10,000 3,223,303 2,547,805 5,771,108 DUARTE 211,330 138,437 81,845 189,128 5,000 625,740 489,105 1,114,845 EL MONTE 1,147,063 751,415 422,989 1,026,553 10,000 3,358,019 2,654,780 6,012,800 EL SEGUNDO 164,084 107,488 64,621 146,846 4,000 487,038 379,759 866,797 GARDENA 594,328 389,330 221,476 531,888 7,500 1,744,522 1,375,521 3,120,043 GLENDALE 2,007,560 1,315,106 736,703 1,796,646 10,000 5,866,015 4,646,327 10,512,342 GLENDORA 507,617 332,528 189,864 454,287 7,500 1,491,796 1,174,837 2,666,633 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 142,485 93,339 56,746 127,516 3,000 423,087 329,770 752,857 HAWTHORNE 856,853 561,304 317,186 766,832 7,500 2,509,675 1,983,113 4,492,788 HERMOSA BEACH 192,114 125,850 74,840 171,931 4,000 568,735 444,633 1,013,368 HIDDEN HILLS 18,841 12,342 11,669 16,862 1,000 60,714 43,606 104,320 HUNTINGTON PARK 580,470 380,253 216,424 519,486 7,500 1,704,133 1,343,449 3,047,582 INDUSTRY 4,442 2,910 6,419 3,975 1,000 18,746 10,280 29,027 INGLEWOOD 1,084,955 710,729 400,346 970,970 10,000 3,177,001 2,511,037 5,688,038 IRWINDALE 14,192 9,297 9,974 12,701 1,000 47,165 32,847 80,012 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 199,403 130,624 77,497 178,454 5,000 590,977 461,501 1,052,478 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 53,687 35,169 24,373 48,047 2,000 163,275 124,254 287,529 LAKEWOOD 790,067 517,554 292,837 707,062 7,500 2,315,021 1,828,542 4,143,563 LA MIRADA 478,966 313,760 179,418 428,646 6,000 1,406,791 1,108,527 2,515,318 LANCASTER 1,589,352 1,041,148 584,236 1,422,375 10,000 4,647,110 3,678,420 8,325,530 LA PUENTE 394,817 258,635 148,740 353,337 6,000 1,161,529 913,770 2,075,298 LA VERNE 325,844 213,453 123,594 291,611 6,000 960,502 754,139 1,714,641 LAWNDALE 322,742 211,421 122,463 288,835 6,000 951,460 746,958 1,698,418 LOMITA 201,225 131,818 78,161 180,084 5,000 596,288 465,718 1,062,006 LONG BEACH 4,606,670 3,017,724 1,684,270 4,122,695 10,000 13,441,358 10,661,747 24,103,105 LOS ANGELES 38,640,958 25,312,805 14,092,272 34,581,355 20,000 112,647,391 89,431,231 202,078,622 LYNWOOD 688,248 450,855 255,717 615,941 7,500 2,018,260 1,592,891 3,611,151 MALIBU 124,541 81,584 50,204 111,456 3,000 370,785 288,238 659,023 MANHATTAN BEACH 346,044 226,686 130,959 309,689 6,000 1,019,378 800,890 1,820,268 MAYWOOD 272,522 178,523 104,154 243,891 6,000 805,089 630,728 1,435,817 MONROVIA 378,979 248,261 142,966 339,164 6,000 1,115,370 877,116 1,992,486 MONTEBELLO 619,640 405,912 230,704 554,540 7,500 1,818,296 1,434,103 3,252,399 MONTEREY PARK 594,682 389,563 221,605 532,205 7,500 1,745,555 1,376,342 3,121,897 NORWALK 1,039,551 680,986 383,793 930,337 10,000 3,044,667 2,405,954 5,450,621 PALMDALE 1,537,172 1,006,966 565,212 1,375,677 10,000 4,495,027 3,557,654 8,052,681 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 132,351 86,700 53,052 118,446 3,000 393,548 306,315 699,863 PARAMOUNT 543,664 356,142 203,006 486,547 7,500 1,596,859 1,258,265 2,855,125 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
65 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL PASADENA 1,431,118 937,492 526,548 1,280,765 10,000 4,185,923 3,312,201 7,498,124 PICO RIVERA 622,033 407,479 231,577 556,682 7,500 1,825,271 1,439,642 3,264,914 POMONA 1,490,340 976,287 548,138 1,333,765 10,000 4,358,531 3,449,265 7,807,796 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 410,142 268,674 154,327 367,052 6,000 1,206,195 949,238 2,155,433 REDONDO BEACH 657,401 430,648 244,471 588,334 7,500 1,928,354 1,521,498 3,449,852 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 79,757 52,247 33,877 71,378 2,000 239,259 184,591 423,851 ROSEMEAD 534,101 349,877 199,519 477,989 7,500 1,568,986 1,236,132 2,805,118 SAN DIMAS 334,895 219,382 126,894 299,711 6,000 986,883 775,087 1,761,970 SAN FERNANDO 243,802 159,709 93,684 218,188 6,000 721,383 564,259 1,285,642 SAN GABRIEL 393,418 257,719 148,230 352,086 6,000 1,157,453 910,533 2,067,985 SAN MARINO 129,485 84,822 52,007 115,881 3,000 385,195 299,681 684,876 SANTA CLARITA 2,182,261 1,429,549 800,395 1,952,994 10,000 6,375,199 5,050,659 11,425,857 SANTA FE SPRINGS 178,552 116,966 69,895 159,794 4,000 529,207 413,244 942,452 SANTA MONICA 915,641 599,816 338,619 819,444 7,500 2,681,020 2,119,174 4,800,194 SIERRA MADRE 107,521 70,435 43,999 96,225 3,000 321,181 248,849 570,030 SIGNAL HILL 114,416 74,951 46,513 102,395 3,000 341,275 264,806 606,081 SOUTH EL MONTE 209,744 137,399 81,267 187,709 5,000 621,118 485,435 1,106,554 SOUTH GATE 950,950 622,945 351,491 851,043 7,500 2,783,930 2,200,893 4,984,823 SOUTH PASADENA 252,804 165,606 96,966 226,244 6,000 747,620 585,093 1,332,714 TEMPLE CITY 356,780 233,718 134,872 319,297 6,000 1,050,667 825,737 1,876,404 TORRANCE 1,432,418 938,344 527,022 1,281,929 10,000 4,189,712 3,315,210 7,504,922 VERNON 2,905 1,903 5,859 2,600 1,000 14,268 6,724 20,993 WALNUT 293,845 192,491 111,928 262,974 6,000 867,237 680,079 1,547,316 WEST COVINA 1,044,958 684,528 385,764 935,176 10,000 3,060,427 2,418,468 5,478,895 WEST HOLLYWOOD 355,795 233,073 134,513 318,415 6,000 1,047,797 823,457 1,871,254 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 81,451 53,357 34,495 72,894 2,000 244,197 188,512 432,709 WHITTIER 848,944 556,124 314,302 759,754 7,500 2,486,624 1,964,809 4,451,433 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
66 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 184,373 120,779 46,298 165,003 4,000 520,453 426,716 947,169 MADERA 651,728 426,932 151,488 583,257 7,500 1,820,905 1,508,368 3,329,273

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 20,368 13,342 13,119 18,228 1,000 66,057 47,139 113,197 CORTE MADERA 98,776 64,706 45,146 88,398 3,000 300,025 228,608 528,633 FAIRFAX 73,848 48,376 34,964 66,089 2,000 225,277 170,914 396,191 LARKSPUR 120,099 78,674 53,855 107,481 3,000 363,109 277,958 641,067 MILL VALLEY 143,303 93,874 63,333 128,248 3,000 431,758 331,662 763,421 NOVATO 526,783 345,084 219,970 471,440 7,500 1,570,776 1,219,195 2,789,971 ROSS 25,085 16,433 15,046 22,450 1,000 80,015 58,058 138,073 SAN ANSELMO 124,974 81,868 55,847 111,844 3,000 377,532 289,241 666,774 SAN RAFAEL 581,248 380,762 242,216 520,182 7,500 1,731,909 1,345,250 3,077,159 SAUSALITO 72,439 47,453 34,389 64,829 2,000 221,110 167,655 388,765 TIBURON 93,132 61,009 42,841 83,348 2,000 282,329 215,546 497,875

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 72,971 47,802 35,389 65,305 2,000 223,467 168,886 392,353 POINT ARENA 4,422 2,897 6,654 3,958 1,000 18,930 10,235 29,165 UKIAH 158,323 103,713 71,169 141,689 4,000 478,894 366,424 845,318 WILLITS 49,639 32,517 25,609 44,424 2,000 154,189 114,885 269,074

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 313,296 205,233 92,745 280,382 6,000 897,656 725,098 1,622,755 DOS PALOS 54,908 35,969 20,213 49,140 2,000 162,230 127,080 289,310 GUSTINE 57,567 37,711 20,960 51,519 2,000 169,757 133,235 302,992 LIVINGSTON 152,147 99,668 47,509 136,163 4,000 439,487 352,132 791,619 LOS BANOS 422,216 276,584 123,320 377,859 6,000 1,205,979 977,184 2,183,164 MERCED 895,973 586,931 256,307 801,842 7,500 2,548,553 2,073,653 4,622,207

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 28,424 18,620 13,183 26,919 1,000 88,146 65,785 153,931

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 81,097 53,125 64,544 1,924,595 2,000 2,125,360 187,691 2,313,051 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
67 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 39,622 25,956 15,731 35,460 1,000 117,769 91,703 209,472 DEL REY OAKS 16,448 10,775 9,337 14,720 1,000 52,280 38,067 90,347 GONZALES 83,618 54,776 27,868 74,833 2,000 243,095 193,527 436,621 GREENFIELD 181,241 118,727 54,799 162,200 4,000 520,967 419,467 940,434 KING CITY 147,508 96,629 45,493 132,011 3,000 424,642 341,396 766,037 MARINA 215,890 141,425 64,357 193,209 6,000 620,880 499,659 1,120,539 MONTEREY 279,534 183,116 81,915 250,166 6,000 800,732 646,958 1,447,690 PACIFIC GROVE 153,014 100,236 47,012 136,938 4,000 441,200 354,138 795,338 SALINAS 1,577,868 1,033,625 440,084 1,412,098 10,000 4,473,674 3,651,842 8,125,516 SAND CITY 3,792 2,484 5,846 3,393 1,000 16,515 8,776 25,291 SEASIDE 325,263 213,072 94,530 291,091 6,000 929,956 752,794 1,682,750 SOLEDAD 253,493 166,058 74,731 226,861 6,000 727,143 586,689 1,313,832

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 204,879 134,211 64,718 183,354 5,000 592,162 474,175 1,066,337 CALISTOGA 52,594 34,453 20,181 47,068 2,000 156,296 121,723 278,019 NAPA 781,981 512,257 233,495 699,826 7,500 2,235,058 1,809,828 4,044,886 SAINT HELENA 59,783 39,163 22,284 53,503 2,000 176,733 138,364 315,096 YOUNTVILLE 28,887 18,923 13,248 25,852 1,000 87,911 66,857 154,768

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 126,658 82,971 114,131 113,351 3,000 440,111 293,139 733,250 NEVADA CITY 30,345 19,878 30,993 27,157 1,000 109,373 70,230 179,603 TRUCKEE 159,682 104,604 142,637 1,752,829 4,000 2,163,751 369,570 2,533,321 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
68 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 490,608 321,386 199,099 439,065 7,500 1,457,657 1,135,470 2,593,128 ANAHEIM 3,481,304 2,280,522 1,383,524 3,115,560 10,000 10,270,910 8,057,183 18,328,093 BREA 444,554 291,217 180,860 397,849 6,000 1,320,480 1,028,883 2,349,363 BUENA PARK 803,934 526,639 323,187 719,473 7,500 2,380,733 1,860,637 4,241,370 COSTA MESA 1,110,769 727,640 444,705 994,072 10,000 3,287,187 2,570,782 5,857,969 CYPRESS 477,981 313,115 194,098 427,765 6,000 1,418,959 1,106,248 2,525,207 DANA POINT 328,474 215,176 134,888 293,964 6,000 978,501 760,225 1,738,726 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 544,777 356,871 220,552 487,543 7,500 1,617,244 1,260,841 2,878,085 FULLERTON 1,373,255 899,588 548,659 1,228,981 10,000 4,060,483 3,178,282 7,238,766 GARDEN GROVE 1,698,715 1,112,789 677,553 1,520,249 10,000 5,019,306 3,931,532 8,950,838 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,939,011 1,270,201 772,719 1,735,299 10,000 5,727,230 4,487,676 10,214,907 IRVINE 2,674,632 1,752,090 1,064,052 2,393,636 10,000 7,894,410 6,190,210 14,084,620 LAGUNA BEACH 223,799 146,605 93,432 200,286 5,000 669,123 517,963 1,187,086 LAGUNA HILLS 306,038 200,478 126,002 273,886 6,000 912,404 708,299 1,620,702 LAGUNA NIGUEL 641,839 420,454 258,992 574,408 7,500 1,903,193 1,485,483 3,388,675 LAGUNA WOODS 160,273 104,991 68,274 143,434 4,000 480,972 370,938 851,909 LA HABRA 618,596 405,228 249,787 553,606 7,500 1,834,716 1,431,687 3,266,403 LAKE FOREST 832,614 545,426 334,546 745,140 7,500 2,465,226 1,927,015 4,392,242 LA PALMA 153,329 100,442 65,524 137,220 4,000 460,516 354,867 815,383 LOS ALAMITOS 113,638 74,441 49,805 101,699 3,000 342,583 263,005 605,588 MISSION VIEJO 926,977 607,242 371,917 829,590 7,500 2,743,226 2,145,411 4,888,636 NEWPORT BEACH 845,684 553,988 339,722 756,837 7,500 2,503,730 1,957,264 4,460,994 ORANGE 1,352,917 886,265 540,605 1,210,780 10,000 4,000,566 3,131,211 7,131,778 PLACENTIA 504,003 330,160 204,403 451,052 7,500 1,497,119 1,166,471 2,663,590 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 474,554 310,869 192,741 424,698 6,000 1,408,862 1,098,315 2,507,177 SAN CLEMENTE 630,976 413,338 254,690 564,686 7,500 1,871,189 1,460,340 3,331,529 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 352,604 230,983 144,444 315,559 6,000 1,049,590 816,072 1,865,662 SANTA ANA 3,263,651 2,137,943 1,297,325 2,920,773 10,000 9,629,692 7,553,444 17,183,137 SEAL BEACH 240,739 157,703 100,141 215,447 5,000 719,030 557,170 1,276,200 STANTON 389,754 255,319 159,157 348,807 6,000 1,159,037 902,053 2,061,090 TUSTIN 788,008 516,206 316,880 705,220 7,500 2,333,814 1,823,778 4,157,593 VILLA PARK 57,242 37,498 27,470 51,228 2,000 175,439 132,483 307,922 WESTMINSTER 900,848 590,125 361,569 806,205 7,500 2,666,247 2,084,937 4,751,183 YORBA LINDA 668,215 437,732 269,438 598,012 7,500 1,980,897 1,546,527 3,527,424 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
69 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 142,151 93,120 62,511 127,216 3,000 427,997 328,995 756,993 COLFAX 21,392 14,013 13,485 19,145 1,000 69,035 49,510 118,545 LINCOLN 488,746 320,167 203,224 437,399 6,000 1,455,536 1,131,162 2,586,698 LOOMIS 67,052 43,924 32,022 60,007 2,000 205,006 155,186 360,192 ROCKLIN 694,049 454,655 286,573 621,132 7,500 2,063,910 1,606,317 3,670,227 ROSEVILLE 1,446,571 947,615 592,086 1,294,595 10,000 4,290,867 3,347,966 7,638,833

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 20,722 13,575 9,195 132,095 1,000 176,587 47,960 224,547

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 317,463 207,962 129,324 284,110 6,000 944,859 734,740 1,679,600 BEAUMONT 518,904 339,922 208,339 464,388 7,500 1,539,053 1,200,960 2,740,013 BLYTHE 205,026 134,308 85,221 183,486 5,000 613,042 474,516 1,087,559 CALIMESA 100,814 66,041 44,344 90,223 2,000 303,422 233,326 536,749 CANYON LAKE 108,585 71,132 47,392 97,177 3,000 327,286 251,311 578,597 CATHEDRAL CITY 531,580 348,226 213,311 475,732 7,500 1,576,349 1,230,296 2,806,645 COACHELLA 471,028 308,560 189,560 421,542 6,000 1,396,690 1,090,155 2,486,844 CORONA 1,668,951 1,093,292 659,443 1,493,612 10,000 4,925,298 3,862,647 8,787,944 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 296,317 194,110 121,030 265,186 6,000 882,643 685,800 1,568,443 EASTVALE 666,048 436,313 266,056 596,073 7,500 1,971,990 1,541,512 3,513,502 HEMET 832,486 545,343 331,341 745,025 7,500 2,461,695 1,926,719 4,388,414 INDIAN WELLS 53,460 35,021 25,770 47,844 2,000 164,094 123,729 287,824 INDIO 902,375 591,125 358,755 807,571 7,500 2,667,326 2,088,470 4,755,795 JURUPA VALLEY 1,064,647 697,426 422,405 952,795 10,000 3,147,273 2,464,035 5,611,307 LAKE ELSINORE 637,840 417,835 254,992 570,829 7,500 1,888,996 1,476,228 3,365,224 LA QUINTA 406,241 266,119 164,147 363,562 6,000 1,206,070 940,211 2,146,281 MENIFEE 981,807 643,159 389,912 878,659 7,500 2,901,036 2,272,309 5,173,345 MORENO VALLEY 2,062,635 1,351,185 813,864 1,845,936 10,000 6,083,620 4,773,795 10,857,415 MURRIETA 1,134,328 743,072 449,738 1,015,156 10,000 3,352,295 2,625,307 5,977,601 NORCO 266,543 174,606 109,351 238,540 6,000 795,041 616,892 1,411,933 PALM DESERT 530,782 347,703 212,998 475,018 7,500 1,574,001 1,228,450 2,802,451 PALM SPRINGS 470,329 308,102 189,286 420,916 6,000 1,394,632 1,088,536 2,483,168 PERRIS 777,844 509,548 309,908 696,124 7,500 2,300,923 1,800,254 4,101,177 RANCHO MIRAGE 185,151 121,288 77,425 165,699 4,000 553,564 428,517 982,081 RIVERSIDE 3,194,048 2,092,348 1,257,659 2,858,483 10,000 9,412,537 7,392,354 16,804,892 SAN JACINTO 504,948 330,780 202,865 451,898 7,500 1,497,991 1,168,660 2,666,651 TEMECULA 1,110,681 727,582 440,462 993,993 10,000 3,282,718 2,570,577 5,853,294 WILDOMAR 364,541 238,802 147,790 326,242 6,000 1,083,376 843,699 1,927,075 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16 70 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 864,850 566,543 369,459 773,989 7,500 2,582,341 2,001,622 4,583,963 ELK GROVE 1,754,342 1,149,229 744,508 1,570,032 10,000 5,228,111 4,060,276 9,288,387 FOLSOM 810,602 531,007 346,585 725,440 7,500 2,421,134 1,876,069 4,297,203 GALT 257,216 168,497 113,254 230,193 6,000 775,160 595,305 1,370,465 ISLETON 8,194 5,368 8,255 7,333 1,000 30,151 18,965 49,116 RANCHO CORDOVA 784,590 513,967 335,618 702,162 7,500 2,343,837 1,815,868 4,159,706 SACRAMENTO 5,078,860 3,327,045 2,146,270 4,545,277 20,000 15,117,452 11,754,592 26,872,043

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 407,610 267,016 157,759 364,787 6,000 1,203,173 943,380 2,146,553 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 21,185 13,878 12,750 18,959 1,000 67,772 49,031 116,804

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 346,163 226,763 141,495 309,795 6,000 1,030,216 801,164 1,831,380 APPLE VALLEY 732,273 479,695 293,965 655,340 7,500 2,168,773 1,694,783 3,863,557 BARSTOW 238,395 156,167 98,939 213,349 5,000 711,850 551,745 1,263,595 BIG BEAR LAKE 51,106 33,479 24,981 421,263 2,000 532,830 118,281 651,111 CHINO 868,524 568,950 347,769 777,277 7,500 2,570,020 2,010,124 4,580,144 CHINO HILLS 814,128 533,316 326,289 728,596 7,500 2,409,829 1,884,230 4,294,058 COLTON 533,796 349,677 215,589 477,715 7,500 1,584,278 1,235,425 2,819,703 FONTANA 2,107,133 1,380,334 836,881 1,885,758 10,000 6,220,107 4,876,781 11,096,888 GRAND TERRACE 122,118 79,996 53,023 109,288 3,000 367,425 282,631 650,056 HESPERIA 946,025 619,719 378,374 846,636 7,500 2,798,255 2,189,496 4,987,750 HIGHLAND 542,286 355,239 218,942 485,313 7,500 1,609,280 1,255,074 2,864,354 LOMA LINDA 245,191 160,619 101,623 219,431 5,000 731,863 567,473 1,299,336 MONTCLAIR 390,000 255,480 158,806 349,027 6,000 1,159,314 902,623 2,061,937 NEEDLES 52,722 34,537 25,619 47,183 2,000 162,060 122,020 284,080 ONTARIO 1,792,556 1,174,262 712,658 1,604,231 10,000 5,293,708 4,148,720 9,442,427 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,724,864 1,129,919 685,927 1,543,651 10,000 5,094,361 3,992,052 9,086,413 REDLANDS 700,795 459,075 281,535 627,170 7,500 2,076,076 1,621,931 3,698,007 RIALTO 1,010,182 661,747 403,708 904,052 10,000 2,989,689 2,337,980 5,327,669 SAN BERNARDINO 2,130,249 1,395,477 846,009 1,906,446 10,000 6,288,180 4,930,280 11,218,460 TWENTYNINE PALMS 295,145 193,343 121,349 264,137 6,000 879,973 683,088 1,563,061 UPLAND 773,274 506,554 310,156 692,034 7,500 2,289,519 1,789,677 4,079,196 VICTORVILLE 1,252,496 820,482 499,395 1,120,910 10,000 3,703,283 2,898,797 6,602,080 YUCAIPA 547,939 358,942 221,174 490,373 7,500 1,625,928 1,268,158 2,894,086 YUCCA VALLEY 219,928 144,070 91,647 196,822 5,000 657,467 509,005 1,166,472 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16 71 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 1,137,569 745,195 466,929 1,018,056 10,000 3,377,748 2,632,806 6,010,555 CHULA VISTA 2,703,046 1,770,704 1,102,892 2,419,065 10,000 8,005,708 6,255,972 14,261,680 CORONADO 243,241 159,341 103,615 217,686 5,000 728,882 562,960 1,291,842 DEL MAR 41,937 27,472 21,837 37,531 1,000 129,777 97,060 226,836 EL CAJON 1,016,840 666,108 417,883 910,011 10,000 3,020,842 2,353,389 5,374,231 ENCINITAS 613,484 401,879 254,023 549,032 7,500 1,825,918 1,419,857 3,245,775 ESCONDIDO 1,493,974 978,668 611,716 1,337,018 10,000 4,431,376 3,457,677 7,889,052 IMPERIAL BEACH 273,546 179,194 115,926 244,807 6,000 819,473 633,099 1,452,572 LA MESA 586,783 384,388 243,176 525,136 7,500 1,746,984 1,358,060 3,105,044 LEMON GROVE 259,472 169,974 110,208 232,212 6,000 777,866 600,525 1,378,391 NATIONAL CITY 618,014 404,847 255,864 553,086 7,500 1,839,311 1,430,342 3,269,654 OCEANSIDE 1,740,849 1,140,390 712,007 1,557,956 10,000 5,161,202 4,029,048 9,190,250 POWAY 481,970 315,728 200,597 431,335 6,000 1,435,630 1,115,480 2,551,109 SAN DIEGO 13,897,264 9,103,779 5,650,459 12,437,223 20,000 41,108,726 32,164,043 73,272,768 SAN MARCOS 948,478 621,326 390,112 848,831 7,500 2,816,247 2,195,172 5,011,418 SANTEE 559,423 366,465 232,061 500,650 7,500 1,666,099 1,294,737 2,960,836 SOLANA BEACH 136,182 89,210 60,123 121,875 3,000 410,389 315,182 725,571 VISTA 1,017,086 666,270 417,983 910,231 10,000 3,021,570 2,353,959 5,375,529

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 8,617,967 5,645,433 2,120,589 7,712,567 20,000 24,116,557 19,945,557 44,062,114

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 73,877 48,395 32,216 66,116 2,000 222,604 170,983 393,587 LATHROP 280,726 183,897 108,977 251,233 6,000 830,833 649,716 1,480,549 LODI 677,128 443,571 256,081 605,989 7,500 1,990,269 1,567,156 3,557,425 MANTECA 860,004 563,369 323,946 769,653 7,500 2,524,472 1,990,407 4,514,879 RIPON 160,460 105,114 64,346 143,602 4,000 477,522 371,371 848,892 STOCKTON 3,160,305 2,070,244 1,177,583 2,828,285 10,000 9,246,417 7,314,260 16,560,677 TRACY 971,121 636,159 365,181 869,095 7,500 2,849,055 2,247,576 5,096,632

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 172,899 113,262 84,844 154,734 4,000 529,739 400,160 929,900 ATASCADERO 291,757 191,123 139,869 261,105 6,000 889,854 675,246 1,565,100 EL PASO DE ROBLES 306,038 200,478 146,480 273,886 6,000 932,882 708,299 1,641,180 GROVER BEACH 129,573 84,881 64,786 115,960 3,000 398,200 299,887 698,087 MORRO BAY 100,795 66,028 51,463 90,205 3,000 311,491 233,281 544,771 PISMO BEACH 79,856 52,312 41,769 71,466 2,000 247,402 184,819 432,222 SAN LUIS OBISPO 453,625 297,159 214,806 405,967 6,000 1,377,557 1,049,877 2,427,434 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16 72 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 68,096 44,608 31,731 60,942 2,000 207,376 157,602 364,979 BELMONT 260,703 170,780 107,903 233,314 6,000 778,699 603,375 1,382,074 BRISBANE 45,099 29,543 22,636 40,361 1,000 138,638 104,377 243,014 BURLINGAME 292,968 191,917 120,663 262,189 6,000 873,737 678,050 1,551,787 COLMA 16,339 10,704 11,262 14,623 1,000 53,928 37,816 91,744 DALY CITY 1,069,591 700,664 427,801 957,220 10,000 3,165,276 2,475,477 5,640,754 EAST PALO ALTO 298,917 195,814 123,016 267,513 6,000 891,259 691,818 1,583,077 FOSTER CITY 323,461 211,892 132,722 289,478 6,000 963,552 748,622 1,712,175 HALF MOON BAY 121,231 79,416 52,744 108,495 3,000 364,886 280,579 645,466 HILLSBOROUGH 112,190 73,493 49,169 100,403 3,000 338,255 259,654 597,909 MENLO PARK 342,991 224,686 140,446 306,957 6,000 1,021,079 793,824 1,814,904 MILLBRAE 221,691 145,225 92,474 198,400 5,000 662,790 513,085 1,175,875 PACIFICA 373,178 244,461 152,384 333,972 6,000 1,109,996 863,690 1,973,685 PORTOLA VALLEY 44,911 29,420 22,562 40,193 1,000 138,086 103,944 242,030 REDWOOD CITY 838,957 549,581 336,590 750,816 7,500 2,483,445 1,941,695 4,425,140 SAN BRUNO 442,574 289,920 179,829 396,078 6,000 1,314,401 1,024,301 2,338,702 SAN CARLOS 293,638 192,355 120,928 262,788 6,000 875,709 679,600 1,555,310 SAN MATEO 1,014,889 664,831 406,168 908,266 10,000 3,004,154 2,348,876 5,353,030 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 661,212 433,145 266,296 591,745 7,500 1,959,898 1,530,320 3,490,218 WOODSIDE 55,430 36,311 26,721 49,607 2,000 170,069 128,288 298,358

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 53,529 35,066 22,319 47,906 2,000 160,819 123,889 284,708 CARPINTERIA 129,967 85,139 47,334 116,313 3,000 381,753 300,798 682,552 GOLETA 318,507 208,646 109,038 285,044 6,000 927,235 737,157 1,664,392 GUADALUPE 82,200 53,847 31,702 73,564 2,000 243,312 190,244 433,556 LOMPOC 418,513 274,158 141,767 374,544 6,000 1,214,983 968,614 2,183,597 SANTA BARBARA 916,498 600,377 304,742 820,211 7,500 2,649,328 2,121,157 4,770,486 SANTA MARIA 1,058,225 693,219 351,125 947,048 10,000 3,059,618 2,449,172 5,508,790 SOLVANG 54,288 35,563 22,567 48,584 2,000 163,001 125,644 288,645 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16 73 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 409,058 267,965 158,627 366,083 6,000 1,207,733 946,731 2,154,464 CUPERTINO 577,703 378,440 222,047 517,009 7,500 1,702,698 1,337,044 3,039,742 GILROY 557,443 365,168 214,428 498,878 7,500 1,643,418 1,290,155 2,933,573 LOS ALTOS 300,493 196,846 117,801 268,923 6,000 890,063 695,465 1,585,528 LOS ALTOS HILLS 82,633 54,131 35,874 73,952 2,000 248,590 191,247 439,837 LOS GATOS 303,704 198,949 119,008 271,797 6,000 899,458 702,896 1,602,354 MILPITAS 745,204 488,166 285,036 666,914 7,500 2,192,820 1,724,712 3,917,533 MONTE SERENO 35,496 23,252 18,148 31,767 1,000 109,663 82,152 191,815 MORGAN HILL 466,586 305,650 180,261 417,567 6,000 1,376,064 1,079,874 2,455,938 MOUNTAIN VIEW 815,635 534,303 311,521 729,944 7,500 2,398,904 1,887,717 4,286,621 PALO ALTO 666,353 436,513 255,384 596,347 7,500 1,962,096 1,542,218 3,504,315 SAN JOSE 10,142,316 6,643,998 3,818,844 9,076,768 20,000 29,701,926 23,473,532 53,175,459 SANTA CLARA 1,287,716 843,554 489,049 1,152,429 10,000 3,782,749 2,980,311 6,763,059 SARATOGA 300,847 197,078 117,934 269,240 6,000 891,100 696,286 1,587,386 SUNNYVALE 1,515,041 992,469 574,535 1,355,871 10,000 4,447,916 3,506,434 7,954,351

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 99,386 65,106 41,639 88,945 3,000 298,076 230,021 528,097 SANTA CRUZ 590,408 386,763 223,646 528,380 7,500 1,736,696 1,366,449 3,103,144 SCOTTS VALLEY 115,775 75,841 47,714 103,612 3,000 345,942 267,951 613,893 WATSONVILLE 505,903 331,406 192,322 452,753 7,500 1,489,885 1,170,871 2,660,756

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 105,404 69,048 58,367 94,330 3,000 330,149 243,948 574,098 REDDING 903,300 591,731 463,868 808,400 7,500 2,774,799 2,090,612 4,865,412 SHASTA LAKE 104,961 68,757 58,142 93,934 3,000 328,794 242,923 571,717

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 7,574 4,961 6,307 23,033 1,000 42,875 17,529 60,404

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 9,760 6,394 9,340 8,735 1,000 35,229 22,590 57,818 DUNSMUIR 16,251 10,646 12,359 40,402 1,000 80,657 37,611 118,268 ETNA 7,318 4,794 8,204 6,549 1,000 27,864 16,936 44,801 FORT JONES 6,993 4,581 8,053 6,258 1,000 26,884 16,184 43,069 MONTAGUE 14,212 9,310 11,411 12,719 1,000 48,652 32,893 81,544 MOUNT SHASTA 33,565 21,988 20,412 98,475 1,000 175,441 77,684 253,125 TULELAKE 9,947 6,516 9,427 8,902 1,000 35,793 23,023 58,816 WEED 29,222 19,143 18,392 26,152 1,000 93,909 67,632 161,540 YREKA 76,477 50,099 40,372 69,109 2,000 238,057 177,001 415,058 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16 74 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 267,016 174,916 117,458 238,963 6,000 804,354 617,986 1,422,340 DIXON 198,920 130,308 88,727 178,022 4,000 599,977 460,384 1,060,361 FAIRFIELD 1,162,230 761,350 495,162 1,040,127 10,000 3,468,870 2,689,884 6,158,754 RIO VISTA 99,278 65,035 46,687 88,848 2,000 301,847 229,770 531,617 SUISUN CITY 284,459 186,342 124,817 254,574 6,000 856,192 658,355 1,514,547 VACAVILLE 965,605 632,546 412,203 864,159 7,500 2,882,013 2,234,811 5,116,825 VALLEJO 1,160,664 760,325 494,502 1,038,726 10,000 3,464,216 2,686,260 6,150,476

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 89,951 58,925 41,392 80,501 2,000 272,768 208,184 480,951 COTATI 73,168 47,931 34,564 65,481 2,000 223,145 169,342 392,486 HEALDSBURG 116,218 76,132 52,077 104,008 3,000 351,435 268,977 620,412 PETALUMA 601,813 394,234 249,614 538,587 7,500 1,791,748 1,392,845 3,184,593 ROHNERT PARK 418,425 274,100 175,013 374,465 6,000 1,248,003 968,408 2,216,412 SANTA ROSA 1,691,180 1,107,854 692,764 1,513,506 10,000 5,015,303 3,914,094 8,929,398 SEBASTOPOL 75,414 49,402 35,478 67,491 2,000 229,784 174,539 404,323 SONOMA 107,590 70,480 48,567 96,287 3,000 325,925 249,009 574,934 WINDSOR 274,344 179,716 116,402 245,521 6,000 821,983 634,945 1,456,928

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 481,626 315,502 184,195 431,026 6,000 1,418,349 1,114,682 2,533,031 HUGHSON 71,927 47,118 31,591 64,371 2,000 217,007 166,469 383,476 MODESTO 2,159,825 1,414,852 809,289 1,932,915 10,000 6,326,880 4,998,733 11,325,613 NEWMAN 117,814 77,177 48,683 105,436 3,000 352,110 272,670 624,780 OAKDALE 228,861 149,922 90,046 204,817 5,000 678,646 529,680 1,208,325 PATTERSON 229,521 150,354 90,292 205,408 5,000 680,574 531,207 1,211,781 RIVERBANK 248,086 162,516 97,207 222,022 6,000 735,831 574,175 1,310,006 TURLOCK 736,902 482,727 279,280 659,483 7,500 2,165,892 1,705,497 3,871,389 WATERFORD 88,089 57,705 37,611 78,835 2,000 264,241 203,875 468,116

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 92,256 60,434 38,578 82,563 2,000 275,831 213,518 489,349 YUBA CITY 697,072 456,636 260,022 623,838 7,500 2,045,069 1,613,315 3,658,384

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 75,483 49,447 33,412 67,553 2,000 227,894 174,698 402,593 RED BLUFF 140,565 92,081 58,082 125,797 3,000 419,525 325,325 744,850 TEHAMA 4,412 2,890 6,473 3,949 1,000 18,724 10,212 28,936

TRINITY COUNTY
20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16 75 ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 261,166 171,084 95,467 233,728 6,000 767,445 604,446 1,371,891 EXETER 108,309 70,951 42,401 96,930 3,000 321,592 250,673 572,265 FARMERSVILLE 111,560 73,080 43,529 99,839 3,000 331,008 258,195 589,203 LINDSAY 128,923 84,455 49,558 115,379 3,000 381,314 298,382 679,696 PORTERVILLE 586,714 384,343 208,486 525,074 7,500 1,712,118 1,357,901 3,070,019 TULARE 682,003 446,765 241,567 610,352 7,500 1,988,187 1,578,439 3,566,627 VISALIA 1,371,512 898,446 480,939 1,227,421 10,000 3,988,318 3,174,248 7,162,566 WOODLAKE 79,324 51,963 32,338 70,990 2,000 236,615 183,588 420,204

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 48,290 31,633 33,995 43,216 1,000 158,135 111,762 269,897

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 686,554 449,746 283,075 614,425 7,500 2,041,299 1,588,970 3,630,269 FILLMORE 155,683 101,984 67,902 139,327 4,000 468,896 360,315 829,211 MOORPARK 354,377 232,144 148,437 317,146 6,000 1,058,103 820,175 1,878,278 OJAI 73,483 48,137 34,584 65,763 2,000 223,968 170,071 394,039 OXNARD 2,015,843 1,320,532 821,865 1,804,059 10,000 5,972,299 4,665,497 10,637,796 PORT HUENEME 230,210 150,806 98,109 206,025 5,000 690,150 532,802 1,222,952 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1,048,258 686,690 429,682 938,128 10,000 3,112,758 2,426,104 5,538,862 SANTA PAULA 302,275 198,014 127,319 270,519 6,000 904,126 699,591 1,603,717 SIMI VALLEY 1,225,884 803,049 501,678 1,097,094 10,000 3,637,704 2,837,206 6,474,910 THOUSAND OAKS 1,247,700 817,340 510,520 1,116,617 10,000 3,702,177 2,887,696 6,589,873

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 682,486 447,081 267,494 610,784 7,500 2,015,345 1,579,556 3,594,901 WEST SACRAMENTO 531,521 348,187 209,386 475,679 7,500 1,572,273 1,230,160 2,802,433 WINTERS 75,030 49,150 33,679 67,147 2,000 227,006 173,650 400,656 WOODLAND 600,572 393,421 235,965 537,476 7,500 1,774,933 1,389,973 3,164,906

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 120,168 78,719 46,709 107,543 3,000 356,139 278,118 634,256 WHEATLAND 35,555 23,291 17,200 31,819 1,000 108,865 82,289 191,154 Statewide Total 325,838,000$ 213,449,000 $ 124,134,540 $ 296,829,500 $ 2,709,500 $ 962,960,540$ 754,124,500 $ 1,717,085,040$ Notes:

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.

4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.

5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16 76 ATTACHMENT C
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Source: CSAC
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Maintnc
Sec2103 (2) Sec2104 Sec2105 Sec2106 HUTA Rehab Acct
ALAMEDA COUNTY 8,384,599 13,650,512 6,221,435 408,166 28,664,712 20,479,305 49,144,017 ALPINE COUNTY 163,137 290,232 138,185 22,026 613,580 398,462 1,012,042 AMADOR COUNTY 810,831 708,673 521,894 190,283 2,231,681 1,980,446 4,212,127 BUTTE COUNTY 2,743,491 2,465,206 1,765,859 412,978 7,387,534 6,700,952 14,088,486 CALAVERAS COUNTY 1,230,752 1,009,598 792,178 318,937 3,351,465 3,006,100 6,357,565 COLUSA COUNTY 959,880 610,599 617,831 116,346 2,304,656 2,344,498 4,649,154 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 7,100,212 11,120,564 5,320,608 902,502 24,443,886 17,342,201 41,786,087 DEL NORTE COUNTY 498,548 329,733 320,893 109,330 1,258,504 1,217,700 2,476,204 EL DORADO COUNTY 2,598,594 3,605,610 1,953,012 807,644 8,964,860 6,347,042 15,311,902 FRESNO COUNTY 9,126,793 9,545,885 5,874,497 1,182,329 25,729,504 22,292,105 48,021,609 GLENN COUNTY 1,171,307 749,033 753,916 139,338 2,813,594 2,860,906 5,674,500 HUMBOLDT COUNTY 2,232,827 1,727,952 1,437,168 401,153 5,799,100 5,453,659 11,252,759 IMPERIAL COUNTY 4,112,843 2,395,954 2,647,248 425,908 9,581,953 10,045,581 19,627,534 INYO COUNTY 1,359,102 960,853 874,791 120,061 3,314,807 3,319,593 6,634,400 KERN COUNTY 8,456,883 8,618,249 5,443,307 1,932,101 24,450,540 20,655,857 45,106,397 KINGS COUNTY 1,746,800 1,321,310 1,124,335 218,807 4,411,252 4,266,542 8,677,794 LAKE COUNTY 1,224,175 996,604 787,945 334,892 3,343,616 2,990,035 6,333,651 LASSEN COUNTY 1,175,966 931,481 756,915 125,182 2,989,544 2,872,285 5,861,829 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 51,110,365 82,543,840 37,682,591 2,608,129 173,944,925 124,836,584 298,781,509 MADERA COUNTY 2,559,216 1,689,334 1,647,249 481,187 6,376,986 6,250,860 12,627,846 MARIN COUNTY 1,893,846 2,530,909 1,245,616 283,830 5,954,201 4,625,701 10,579,902 MARIPOSA COUNTY 777,078 533,752 500,169 128,686 1,939,685 1,898,005 3,837,690 MENDOCINO COUNTY 1,816,849 1,315,114 1,169,423 392,090 4,693,476 4,437,638 9,131,114 MERCED COUNTY 3,439,853 2,709,365 2,214,075 576,896 8,940,189 8,401,807 17,341,996 MODOC COUNTY 1,144,547 865,076 736,692 62,918 2,809,233 2,795,545 5,604,778 MONO COUNTY 841,522 774,487 541,649 31,320 2,188,978 2,055,408 4,244,386 MONTEREY COUNTY 3,818,973 4,300,505 2,458,097 853,162 11,430,737 9,327,804 20,758,541 NAPA COUNTY 1,330,957 1,553,334 856,676 305,000 4,045,967 3,250,850 7,296,817 NEVADA COUNTY 1,411,631 1,688,542 908,602 307,387 4,316,162 3,447,894 7,764,056 ORANGE COUNTY 17,344,378 29,396,802 13,328,114 720,956 60,790,250 42,363,479 103,153,729 PLACER COUNTY 3,875,029 5,930,419 2,980,920 805,615 13,591,983 9,464,722 23,056,705 PLUMAS COUNTY 944,250 1,042,945 607,770 149,978 2,744,943 2,306,322 5,051,265 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 15,407,016 22,662,148 10,707,660 1,534,128 50,310,952 37,631,490 87,942,442 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 10,893,843 14,755,142 7,458,174 2,098,215 35,205,374 26,608,109 61,813,483 SAN BENITO COUNTY 919,371 778,967 591,757 157,804 2,447,899 2,245,556 4,693,455 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 14,685,236 21,556,867 10,176,157 1,438,363 47,856,623 35,868,551 83,725,174 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 20,140,359 31,345,467 14,721,866 1,921,776 68,129,468 49,192,637 117,322,105 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 3,868,645 4,963,934 2,490,069 9,600 11,332,248 9,449,129 20,781,377 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 6,185,778 7,654,783 3,981,501 902,824 18,724,886 15,108,705 33,833,591 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3,346,034 3,331,756 2,153,688 646,113 9,477,591 8,172,657 17,650,248 SAN MATEO COUNTY 4,425,381 7,084,220 3,260,044 282,555 15,052,200 10,808,951 25,861,151 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 3,371,461 4,351,196 2,272,784 784,652 10,780,093 8,234,763 19,014,856 SANTA CLARA COUNTY 10,331,518 16,724,552 7,530,666 292,619 34,879,355 25,234,635 60,113,990 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 2,206,086 2,788,359 1,511,077 626,246 7,131,768 5,388,344 12,520,112 SHASTA COUNTY 2,613,071 2,528,760 1,681,914 405,038 7,228,783 6,382,401 13,611,184 SIERRA COUNTY 457,983 432,242 294,783 33,941 1,218,949 1,118,619 2,337,568 SISKIYOU COUNTY 1,872,148 1,551,292 1,205,016 201,870 4,830,326 4,572,704 9,403,030 SOLANO COUNTY 3,256,965 4,581,759 2,116,187 200,223 10,155,134 7,955,106 18,110,240 SONOMA COUNTY 4,687,193 5,635,501 3,016,931 907,467 14,247,092 11,448,424 25,695,516 STANISLAUS COUNTY 4,854,217 5,616,251 3,124,436 716,520 14,311,424 11,856,379 26,167,803 SUTTER COUNTY 1,487,292 1,182,256 957,301 200,790 3,827,639 3,632,696 7,460,335 TEHAMA COUNTY 1,647,546 1,012,121 1,060,449 258,011 3,978,127 4,024,115 8,002,242 TRINITY COUNTY 865,414 694,559 557,027 92,469 2,209,469 2,113,765 4,323,234 TULARE COUNTY 5,799,942 4,635,429 3,733,156 726,349 14,894,876 14,166,304 29,061,180 TUOLUMNE COUNTY 1,143,082 1,041,148 735,750 314,931 3,234,911 2,791,968 6,026,879 VENTURA COUNTY 5,473,121 8,537,071 4,044,171 601,609 18,655,972 13,368,045 32,024,017 YOLO COUNTY 2,030,241 2,134,845 1,306,773 173,116 5,644,975 4,958,843 10,603,818 YUBA COUNTY 1,175,323 876,904 756,501 280,040 3,088,768 2,870,715 5,959,483 Total 280,549,500$ 376,370,000 $ 195,675,500 $ 31,682,407 $ 884,277,407 $ 617,450,500 $ 1,501,727,907$ Notes:

Highway Users Tax Acct (1) Streets & Hwys Code TOTAL
Annual

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 1
77 ATTACHMENT D
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Source: CSAC
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Maintnc
Sec2103 (2) Sec2104 Sec2105 Sec2106 HUTA Rehab Acct
ALAMEDA COUNTY 9,738,107 14,943,155 6,799,281 445,097 31,925,640 22,538,026 54,463,666 ALPINE COUNTY 189,472 291,006 138,822 23,178 642,478 438,518 1,080,996 AMADOR COUNTY 941,721 769,526 568,427 207,025 2,486,699 2,179,534 4,666,233 BUTTE COUNTY 3,186,367 2,689,120 1,923,306 450,354 8,249,147 7,374,578 15,623,725 CALAVERAS COUNTY 1,429,429 1,090,144 862,810 347,600 3,729,983 3,308,294 7,038,277 COLUSA COUNTY 1,114,831 618,822 672,917 126,237 2,532,807 2,580,183 5,112,990 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 8,246,384 12,169,278 5,812,307 985,236 27,213,205 19,085,558 46,298,763 DEL NORTE COUNTY 579,028 358,701 349,504 118,571 1,405,804 1,340,112 2,745,916 EL DORADO COUNTY 3,018,080 3,841,424 2,086,858 881,589 9,827,951 6,985,090 16,813,041 FRESNO COUNTY 10,600,111 10,429,426 6,398,275 1,290,993 28,718,805 24,533,062 53,251,867 GLENN COUNTY 1,360,389 759,470 821,137 151,360 3,092,356 3,148,504 6,240,860 HUMBOLDT COUNTY 2,593,268 1,882,752 1,565,308 437,433 6,478,761 6,001,899 12,480,660 IMPERIAL COUNTY 4,776,771 2,581,255 2,883,280 464,482 10,705,788 11,055,432 21,761,220 INYO COUNTY 1,578,499 968,610 952,789 130,296 3,630,194 3,653,301 7,283,495 KERN COUNTY 9,822,060 9,419,929 5,928,640 2,110,237 27,280,866 22,732,327 50,013,193 KINGS COUNTY 2,028,782 1,444,838 1,224,582 238,191 4,936,393 4,695,445 9,631,838 LAKE COUNTY 1,421,790 1,089,111 858,199 365,033 3,734,133 3,290,614 7,024,747 LASSEN COUNTY 1,365,799 941,314 824,403 135,892 3,267,408 3,161,027 6,428,435 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 59,361,001 90,352,288 41,180,840 2,848,905 193,743,034 137,386,018 331,129,052 MADERA COUNTY 2,972,344 1,845,212 1,794,120 524,884 7,136,560 6,879,240 14,015,800 MARIN COUNTY 2,199,565 2,767,465 1,359,438 309,239 6,635,707 5,090,708 11,726,415 MARIPOSA COUNTY 902,520 541,175 544,765 139,721 2,128,181 2,088,806 4,216,987 MENDOCINO COUNTY 2,110,140 1,434,227 1,273,690 427,532 5,245,589 4,883,740 10,129,329 MERCED COUNTY 3,995,140 2,964,656 2,411,485 629,461 10,000,742 9,246,415 19,247,157 MODOC COUNTY 1,329,309 868,878 802,377 67,859 3,068,423 3,076,573 6,144,996 MONO COUNTY 977,367 779,249 589,943 33,333 2,379,892 2,262,032 4,641,924 MONTEREY COUNTY 4,435,461 4,705,079 2,677,264 931,325 12,749,129 10,265,499 23,014,628 NAPA COUNTY 1,545,810 1,697,961 933,058 332,371 4,509,200 3,577,648 8,086,848 NEVADA COUNTY 1,639,507 1,821,213 989,614 334,979 4,785,313 3,794,501 8,579,814 ORANGE COUNTY 20,144,243 32,185,403 14,568,760 786,869 67,685,275 46,622,148 114,307,423 PLACER COUNTY 4,500,567 6,380,429 3,207,735 879,372 14,968,103 10,416,181 25,384,284 PLUMAS COUNTY 1,096,679 1,051,947 661,960 162,985 2,973,571 2,538,170 5,511,741 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 17,894,137 24,801,340 11,698,712 1,675,388 56,069,577 41,414,467 97,484,044 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 12,652,413 16,153,892 8,150,182 2,291,743 39,248,230 29,282,939 68,531,169 SAN BENITO COUNTY 1,067,783 850,504 644,519 171,537 2,734,343 2,471,294 5,205,637 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 17,055,842 23,516,073 11,084,584 1,570,751 53,227,250 39,474,305 92,701,555 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 23,391,574 34,308,131 16,086,429 2,098,956 75,885,090 54,137,820 130,022,910 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 4,493,152 5,432,760 2,712,087 9,600 12,647,599 10,399,021 23,046,620 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 7,184,335 8,379,523 4,336,497 985,589 20,885,944 16,627,536 37,513,480 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3,886,177 3,643,284 2,345,714 705,092 10,580,267 8,994,229 19,574,496 SAN MATEO COUNTY 5,139,761 7,754,799 3,562,470 307,846 16,764,876 11,895,542 28,660,418 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 3,915,709 4,758,703 2,481,057 856,467 12,011,936 9,062,578 21,074,514 SANTA CLARA COUNTY 11,999,313 18,310,152 8,231,200 318,843 38,859,508 27,771,394 66,630,902 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 2,562,209 3,045,376 1,647,548 683,383 7,938,516 5,930,017 13,868,533 SHASTA COUNTY 3,034,893 2,749,913 1,831,875 441,679 8,058,360 7,024,004 15,082,364 SIERRA COUNTY 531,914 433,846 321,066 36,197 1,323,023 1,231,071 2,554,094 SISKIYOU COUNTY 2,174,365 1,568,684 1,312,456 219,686 5,275,191 5,032,384 10,307,575 SOLANO COUNTY 3,782,730 5,014,788 2,312,051 217,886 11,327,455 8,754,809 20,082,264 SONOMA COUNTY 5,443,836 6,163,699 3,285,924 990,663 15,884,122 12,599,298 28,483,420 STANISLAUS COUNTY 5,637,823 6,147,481 3,403,015 782,022 15,970,341 13,048,264 29,018,605 SUTTER COUNTY 1,727,382 1,292,584 1,042,656 218,505 4,281,127 3,997,880 8,279,007 TEHAMA COUNTY 1,913,505 1,032,373 1,155,000 281,029 4,381,907 4,428,646 8,810,553 TRINITY COUNTY 1,005,115 699,725 606,692 100,147 2,411,679 2,326,255 4,737,934 TULARE COUNTY 6,736,214 5,065,091 4,066,009 792,762 16,660,076 15,590,398 32,250,474 TUOLUMNE COUNTY 1,327,608 1,121,542 801,350 343,222 3,593,722 3,072,636 6,666,358 VENTURA COUNTY 6,356,635 9,339,657 4,416,774 656,463 20,769,529 14,711,893 35,481,422 YOLO COUNTY 2,357,978 2,335,598 1,423,286 188,267 6,305,129 5,457,341 11,762,470 YUBA COUNTY 1,365,053 954,416 823,952 305,099 3,448,520 3,159,299 6,607,819 Total 280,549,500$ 376,370,000 $ 195,675,500 $ 31,682,407 $ 884,277,407 $ 617,450,500 $ 1,501,727,907$ Notes:

Highway Users Tax Acct (1) Streets & Hwys Code TOTAL
Annual

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 1
78 DATE: April 18, 2022

TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council

FROM: Edmund Suen, Interim City Manager
Jennifer Phan, Interim Deputy City Manager

SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE PROCLAMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A

LOCAL EMERGENCY, THE CONTINUING NEED FOR CITY

COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION AND COMMITTEES

TO MEET BY TELECONFERENCE FOR INCREASED

ACCESSIBILITY, AND A GENERAL UPDATE ON THE NOVEL
CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council/EMID Board of Directors adopt the attached resolutions extending the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency caused by the threat of the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and proclaiming the continuing need for City Council/EMID Board of Directors, Planning Commission, and Committees to meet by teleconference and allow for increased meeting accessibility via in person and teleconference meeting participation (Attachments 1 and 2).

The general update is informational only and no further action is required.

BACKGROUND
On March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency in response to the outbreak of respiratory illness due to the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). On March 5, 2020, San Mateo County declared a Local Health Emergency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 101080 due to the introduction of COVID-19 in San Mateo County. On March 16, 2020, the County of San Mateo Public Health Officer issued an order to "shelter in 79 place", effective March 17, 2020 at 12:01 am. This order, amongst other things, ceased non-essential activities in the County in an effort to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19. Essential City operations like police, fire, and wastewater treatment services, as well as the maintenance of critical infrastructure, are continuing to be provided. Most other City services have returned to pre-pandemic levels or have been reasonably modified (for a limited basis) in conjunction with the Health Officer’s order or to administer City operations.

The City Manager, acting as the City’s Director of Emergency Services, was authorized to make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property as affected by such emergency. As a result, on March 16, 2020, the City Manager acting as Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency due to conditions and threatened conditions of peril due to the expansion of the COVID-19 virus. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 8630, the City Council ratified the proclamation made by the Director of Emergency services on March 18, 2020 per Resolution No. 2020-23, within the required seven (7) days of the proclamation.

Local Emergency
Since the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency back in March, the City Council has continued to receive updates at its meetings on the operational impacts and actions taken by the City related to COVID-19. The City Council had also received an overview of the City's recovery plan at its Vision & Policy Summit on June 4, 2020 and a presentation from the County of San Mateo on its Recovery Initiative on October 5, 2020. On October 6, 2020, the County Board of Supervisors accepted the final report on the SMC Recovery Initiative, which outlines a path toward a more equitable, healthy and connected community in the recovery from COVID-19.

To-date, the City Council had approved the continuation of the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency at its meetings on April 6, June 1, July 20, September 8, November 2, 2020, January 4, March 1, May 17, July 19, September 20, November 15, December 13, 2021, January 18, February 22, and March 21, 2022. Per Government Code Section 8630, the City Council must reevaluate whether to continue the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency every sixty (60) days until the emergency is terminated.

Given the conditions creating the local emergency have not entirely abated, one of the items for City Council consideration is to extend the proclamation. 80 Continuing In-Person/Teleconference Hybrid Meetings
Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361) was signed into law by the Governor on September 16, 2021. AB 361 comes as the provisions of Executive Order No.

N-29-20 (as revised by Executive Order No. N-08-21), which modifies the requirements for conducting meetings via teleconference during the COVID- 19 pandemic, expired on September 30, 2021. While the intent of Executive Order No. N-29-20 and AB 361 are both to facilitate public access to meetings via teleconferencing options, there are differences between the two. AB 361 amends the Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to continue using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology after the September 30, 2021 expiration of the current Brown Act exemptions as long as there is a “proclaimed state of emergency” by the Governor and certain findings are made regarding the need to conduct teleconferenced meetings.

On October 18, 2021, the City Council/Board of Directors approved resolutions to implement and utilize teleconference accessibility to conduct public meetings, pursuant to AB 361. Findings must be made every thirty (30) days to continue to the practice of such. By approving the resolutions attached, the City Council/EMID Board, Planning Commission, and Committees may continue to conduct meetings as they have been without interruption, allowing for increased accessibility to the public and meeting participants to join in person or via teleconference, as applicable. Approving the resolutions under AB 361 would also allow the continued flexibility that was provided by Executive Order No. N-29-20 to allow
Councilmembers/EMID Board Members or Planning Commissioners and other Committee Members to attend the meeting via teleconference without following the normal teleconference requirements under the Brown Act, which include listing the teleconference location on the published agenda and posting the agenda at the site of the teleconference. If circumstances change and it is determined that safety concerns prohibit in-person meeting participation entirely, members may pivot to teleconferencing only without the preparation that is otherwise required under the Brown Act, while maintaining accessible public meetings.

Timeline
A summarized timeline of the various directives and orders as it pertains to the County of San Mateo, from the start of the pandemic to-date, is outlined in Attachment 3. At the outset of the pandemic, health orders were frequently 81 changing in response to the varying COVID-19 case/transmission rates. City staff has since then provided updates to City Council at its regular meetings to keep both the City Council and the community abreast of any new developments on COVID-19 that may arise. The frequency of these updates transitioned to a monthly basis on March 2020. In alignment with the State's reopening, as well as the County of San Mateo ceasing its biweekly briefings, these updates are provided (for informational purposes only) on an as needed basis or every thirty (30) days when the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency is brought brought back to City Council for renewal (until no longer necessary) in conjunction with the findings of continuing the need to conduct teleconferenced meetings until no longer applicable. Timely updates and information will continue to be issued and available through the County of San Mateo directly, or on the City website and via the weekly e-Newsletter.

Latest Updates
San Mateo County lifted universal mask requirements for vaccinated individuals for most indoor public settings beginning Wednesday, February

16. Unvaccinated individuals still need to wear masks indoors. Everyone, regardless of vaccination status, is required to wear masks indoors in high- risk settings, including public transportation, health care settings, congregate settings like correctional facilities and homeless shelters, long-term care facilities, and in K-12 schools and childcare settings.

The City Council returned to in-person, hybrid public meetings on March 7, 2022. Effective March 14, 2022, employees and members of the public are no longer required, though strongly encouraged, to wear masks at all Foster City facilities, including City Hall and the Council Chambers.

Vaccinations and booster shots are still available throughout San Mateo County, at County-sponsored clinics, community clinics, private health care providers, pharmacies and other venues. To find a clinic, please visit https://www.smchealth.org/vaccine-clinic-calendar. Appointments are not required, though strongly encouraged, as only a limited number of participants without appointments may be vaccinated. Appointments can be made at https://myturn.ca.gov or by calling the CA COVID-19 Hotline at 1- 833-422-4255.

Residents 50 and over and those who are immunocompromised are now eligible for a second COVID-19 booster, four months after their first booster.

Those eligible for a second booster may book an appointment through the 82 state's MyTurn system as of April 6. The County Health's community clinics will provide boosters for walk-ins, though appointments are recommended to avoid long waits.

As of April 5, 2022, a total of 693,952 individuals have been vaccinated in San Mateo County with at least one dose, representing 96.9% of the population age 12+ or 94.3% of the population age 5+.

Testing remains an important strategy in continuing to reduce the spread of the disease. For those looking for testing locations and schedules, please visit https://www.smcgov.org/testing.

ANALYSIS
With the disruption in normal operations due to COVID-19 and the Public Health Order to “Shelter in Place”, City operations were implemented based on essential functions identified in the City's Continuity of Operations (COOP) and Continuity of Government (COG) Plan.

In the City's response to COVID-19, the main objective is to keep the community safe, reduce the risk of transmission, and help slow the spread of the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Outlined in the COVID-19 Response Plan Summary are six broad priority areas in which the City has focused its efforts to-date (Attachment 4).

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with adoption of the resolutions.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREAS
This item is in alignment to the "City Council Operations and Improved Community Engagement," "Public Safety and Social Equity," and "Staff Empowerment and Operational Excellence" Value/Priority Areas. The City recognizes the importance of reliable and timely communications to public, and as such, will continue to ensure delivery of information for all matters related to City services and COVID-19 response and recovery are shared.

Increasing accessibility to public meetings amid the COVID-19 crisis encourages the public to engage with the City Council/EMID Board of 83 Directors, Planning Commission, and Committees in an equitable and safe manner.

Attachments:
Attachment 1 - City Resolution (Extending the Local Emergency and Continuing the Need for Teleconferencing)
Attachment 2 - EMID Resolution (Continuing the Need for Teleconferencing)
Attachment 3 - COVID-19 Timeline (as of March 10, 2022) Attachment 4 - COVID-19 Response Plan Summary (as of March 10, 2022)
84 RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY

EXTENDING THE PROCLAMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE THREAT OF THE NOVEL COVID-19 VIRUS, AND PROCLAIMING

THE CONTINUING NEED FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND

COMMITTEES TO MEET BY TELECONFERENCE AND ALLOWING FOR INCREASED

MEETING ACCESSIBILITY VIA IN PERSON AND TELECONFERENCE MEETING

PARTICIPATION

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, on January 30, 2020, due to confirmed cases of a severe acute respiratory illness caused by a new coronavirus (“COVID-19”), the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern, and on January 31, 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services declared a Public Health Emergency for the United States of America; and
WHEREAS, on or about March 4, 2020, as part of the State of California's response to address the global COVID-19 outbreak, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the state prepare for broader spread of COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2020, San Mateo County declared a Local Health Emergency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 101080 due to the potential introduction of COVID-19 in San Mateo County; and
WHEREAS, on March 12, 2020, the President of the United States declared a National Emergency in response to the spread of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, Section 2.40.070(A) of the Foster City Municipal Code empowers the City Manager, as the Director of Emergency Services, to proclaim (subject to ratification by the City Council within seven days) the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is not in session; and
WHEREAS, based on the expanding threat of the novel COVID-19 virus, the City Manager, Acting as Director of Emergency Services, of the City of Foster City proclaimed the existence of a local emergency within the City on March 16, 2020; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, per Resolution No. 2020-23, the City Council of the City of Foster City ratified the proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services and 85 extended the period of the existence of a Local Emergency for an additional 30 days or unless sooner terminated; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2020, June 1, 2020, July 20, 2020, September 8, 2020, November 2, 2020, January 4, 2021, March 1, 2021, May 17, 2021, July 19, 2021, September 20, 2021, November 15, 2021, December 13, 2021, January 18, February 22, and March 21, 2022, per Resolutions No. 2020-33, 2020-50, 2020-75, 2020-96, 2020- 113, 2021-9, 2021-24, 2021-63, 2021-103, 2021-129, 2021-172, 2021-185, 2022-5, 2022-15, and 2022-28 respectively, the City Council of the City of Foster City extended the period of the existence of a Local Emergency for an additional 60 days or unless sooner terminated; and
WHEREAS, San Mateo County had completed the variance process as set forth by the California Department of Public Health on June 15, 2020, allowing the County for a gradual re-opening to match the maximum as allowed by the State’s Resilience Roadmap; and
WHEREAS, although collective efforts taken to date regarding this public health emergency have slowed the virus’ trajectory, the emergency and the attendant risk to public health remain significant; and
WHEREAS, San Mateo County was added to the State’s monitoring list on July 29, 2020 and since then ranked in the Purple or Widespread risk level on August 28, 2020, in the Red or Substantial risk level on September 22, 2020, in the Orange or Moderate risk level on October 27, 2020, and in the Red or Substantial risk level on November 17, 2020; and
WHEREAS, San Mateo County then rolled back to the Purple or Widespread risk level on November 29, 2020 and a Limited Stay at Home order went into effect on November 30, 2020, with a Regional Stay at Home order to follow on December 17, 2020; and
WHEREAS, once the Regional Stay at Home order was lifted, San Mateo County rolled back to the Purple or Widespread risk level on January 25, 2021, moving into the Red or Substantial risk level on February 24, and then into the Orange or “Moderate” risk level on March 17; and
WHEREAS, the State has transitioned away from the Blueprint for a Safer Economy beginning June 15, 2021; however, the conditions creating the local emergency have not entirely abated, COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of Foster City residents and Delta variant and other variants continue to emerge and are highly transmissible in indoor settings; and
WHEREAS, San Mateo County continues to experience COVID-19 cases and related hospitalizations; and
86 WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act allows local legislative bodies to meet by teleconference so long as the enumerated requirements are met (California Government Code section 54953); and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, and every 60 days thereafter, the City of Foster City passed a resolution proclaiming a Local Emergency, as defined by the California Emergency Services Act (California Government Code section 8558) as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; and
WHEREAS, the recently amended Ralph M. Brown Act allows local legislative bodies to continue meeting by teleconference during a gubernatorial proclaimed state of emergency if the local legislative body determines, by majority vote, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees (California Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(B)); and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2021 the City Council adopted City Resolution No. 2021-155 proclaiming the continuing need for the City Council, Planning Commission and Committees to meet by teleconference and allowing for increased meeting accessibility via in person and teleconference meeting participation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Foster City:

1. The proclamation of a local emergency is hereby extended for at least an additional 60 days, or until the proclamation is next extended by resolution. Per Government Code Section 8630, the City Council shall review and renew this declaration every 60 days until the emergency is terminated.

2. The City Council of the City of Foster City hereby declares that the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated into this resolution as findings of the City Council.

3. Due to COVID-19, holding meetings in-person only will present imminent risks to the health and safety to attendees; and

4. The City Council/EMID Board of Directors and Planning Commission have safety measures and technology in place to allow hybrid meetings which allow in-person and teleconferenced appearances at meetings, which reduces the risks to health and safety of appearing in person for meetings because the number of attendees is reduced. Committees have conducted meetings remotely during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and are currently reviewing options for conducting hybrid meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e). The Parks and Recreation Committee held its first hybrid meeting on November 2, 2021.

5. The State of California and the City of Foster City continue to follow safety 87 measures in response to COVID-19 as ordered or recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), California Department of Public Health (DPH), and/or County of San Mateo, as applicable, including facial coverings when required. Based upon that guidance, in-person attendance indoors at public meetings continues to present a health risk for certain segments of the population, necessitating the need to reduce the number of in-person meeting attendees.

6. The City Council hereby declares that, pursuant to the findings listed in this Resolution, that the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and the City Council/EMID Board appointed Commissions and Committees are authorized to utilize teleconferencing to conduct public meetings pursuant to AB 361 and Government Code § 54953, as amended thereby.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council determines that, every 30 days, it will reconsider the circumstances of the emergency and review whether it continues to directly impact the ability of the Council/EMID Board and appointed Committee and Commission members to meet safely in person.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the special meeting held on the 18th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RICHA AWASTHI, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
88 RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ESTERO MUNICIPAL

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PROCLAIMING THE CONTINUING NEED FOR THE

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

PLANNING COMMISSION, AND COMMITTEES TO MEET BY TELECONFERENCE

AND ALLOWING FOR INCREASED MEETING ACCESSIBILITY VIA IN PERSON AND

TELECONFERENCE MEETING PARTICIPATION

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act allows local legislative bodies to meet by teleconference so long as the enumerated requirements are met (California Government Code section 54953); and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, and every 60 days thereafter, the City of Foster City passed a resolution proclaiming a Local Emergency, as defined by the California Emergency Services Act (California Government Code section 8558) as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; and
WHEREAS, the recently amended Ralph M. Brown Act allows local legislative bodies to continue meeting by teleconference during a gubernatorial proclaimed state of emergency if the local legislative body determines, by majority vote, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees (California Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(B)); and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and such State of Emergency remains in effect; and
WHEREAS, COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of Foster City residents and Delta variant and other variants continue to emerge and are highly transmissible in indoor settings; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, November 15, December 13, 2021, January 18, February 22, and March 21, 2022 per Resolutions No. 3610, 3621, 3624, 3630, 3634, and 3637 respectively, the EMID Board of Directors proclaimed the continuing need for the Estero Municipal Improvement District Board of Directors, Planning Commission, and Committees to meet by teleconference and allowed for increased meeting accessibility via in person and teleconference meeting participation; and WHEREAS, San Mateo County continues to experience COVID-19 cases and related hospitalizations.
89 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District finds that:

1. The Estero Municipal Improvement District Board of Directors (EMID Board) hereby declares that the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated into this resolution as findings of the EMID Board.

2. Due to COVID-19, holding meetings in-person only will present imminent risks to the health and safety to attendees; and

3. The City Council/EMID Board of Directors and Planning Commission have safety measures and technology in place to allow hybrid meetings which allow in-person and teleconferenced appearances at meetings, which reduces the risks to health and safety of appearing in person for meetings because the number of attendees is reduced. Committees have conducted meetings remotely during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and are currently reviewing options for conducting hybrid meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e). The Parks and Recreation Committee held its first hybrid meeting on November 2, 2021.

4. The State of California and the City of Foster City continue to follow safety measures in response to COVID-19 as ordered or recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), California Department of Public Health (DPH), and/or County of San Mateo, as applicable, including facial coverings when required. Based upon that guidance, in-person attendance indoors at public meetings continues to present a health risk for certain segments of the population, necessitating the need to reduce the number of in-person meeting attendees.

5. The EMID Board of Directors hereby declares that, pursuant to the findings listed in this Resolution, that the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and the City Council/EMID Board appointed Commissions and Committees are authorized to utilize teleconferencing to conduct public meetings pursuant to AB 361 and Government Code § 54953, as amended thereby.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the EMID Board of Directors determines that, every 30 days, it will reconsider the circumstances of the emergency and review whether it continues to directly impact the ability of the Council/EMID Board and appointed Committee and Commission members to meet safely in person. 90 PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District at the special meeting held on the 18th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RICHA AWASTHI, PRESIDENT
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, DISTRICT SECRETARY
91 Attachment 3
NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) TIMELINE
Last Updated: Wednesday, April 6 , 2022

DATE ACTIVITY/DESCRIPTION
March 4, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency in response to the outbreak of respiratory illness due to the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19).

March 5, 2020 County of San Mateo declared a Local Health Emergency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 101080 due to the introduction of COVID-19 in San Mateo County.

March 31, 2020 County of San Mateo Public Health Officer issued a new order extending the "shelter in place" period through May 3, 2020, which was a complement to the indefinite statewide stay -at- home order issued by Governor Gavin Newsom earlier in March.

April 29, 2020 County of San Mateo Public Health Officer issued a new order (alongside the other Bay Area Health Officers) extending the shelter in place orders through May 31, 2020.

May 15, 2020 A revised order was issued, superseding the last order, bringing County of San Mateo into alignment with early Phase 2 of Governor Gavin Newsom’s Resilience Roadmap. The order maintained that all individuals continue to shelter in place and continues to restrict most activity, travel, and governmental and business functions to essential n eeds, outdoor activities, and outdoor businesses but adds additional businesses and activities to the list of permitted functions.

May 28, 2020 A revised order was issued with a few modifications to the previous order to allow places of worship to hold services and retail stores to allow customers inside. It also provided guidelines for additional activities such as car parades and protests.

June 4, 2020 A revised order was issued to allow outdoor dining and charter boat operations, as well as amending the guidelines for funerals.

June 17, 2020 The County of San Mateo Public Health Officer rescinded the shelter in place order and replaced it with the Safer Community Order. The Safer Community Order align ed County of San Mateo with the State’s Resilience Roadmap and limits gatherings to no more than 50 people, outline d social distancing and face covering requirements, allow ed for "social bubbles," and requir ed businesses to implement a social distancing protocol and written health and safety plans.

July 29, 2020 County of San Mateo was added to the state's monitoring list due to an increase in the rate of COVID-19 cases in the County and as a result, specific indoor businesses were required to cease operations starting August 2, unless they could be modified to operate outside or by pick-up.

August 28, 2020 County of San Mateo was placed in the purple tier rank or "widespread" county risk level under the State's new color-coded reopening system.

September 22, 2020 County of San Mateo moved to the red tier rank or "substantial" county risk level.

October 27, 2020 County of San Mateo moved to the orange tier rank or "moderate" county risk level.

November 17, 2020 As COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations surged and ICU capacity levels declined, County of San Mateo rolled back to the red tier rank or "substantial" county risk level.

November 29, 2020 County of San Mateo then rolled back to the purple tier rank or "widespread" county risk level.

November 30, 2020 A Limited Stay at Home order went into effect.

December 17, 2020 A Regional Stay at Home order then went into effect.

January 25, 2021 The Regional Stay at Home order ended and the County of San Mateo returned to the purple tier rank or “widespread” county risk level.

February 24, 2021 County of San Mateo moved into the red tier rank or "substantial" county risk level.

March 17, 2021 County of San Mateo moved into the orange tier rank or "moderate" county risk level. 92 April 2, 2021 The California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released updated guidance recommending delaying travel until persons are fully vaccinated.

Fully vaccinated travelers should follow CDC travel guidance and are not required to test or quarantine before or after travel unless they have symptoms concerning for COVID-19 disease.

April 6, 2021 Governor Gavin Newsom outlines the State’s next step in the COVID-19 pandemic recovery, moving beyond the Blueprint for a Safer Economy, and announces that on June 15, California will fully reopen if criteria are met.

April 15, 2021 The California Department of Public Health adjusted its Orange Tier 3 guidance for gatherings, private events and indoor seated live events and performances. O utdoor gathering size increases to 50 people. For private events or meetings such as receptions or conferences, outdoor gatherings are limited to 100 people. Indoor live events or performances are allowed with capacity limits and modifications including physical distancing, advance ticket purchases, designated areas for eating and drinking, and attendance limited to in-state visitors.

May 3, 2021 The California Department of Public Health provides updated guidance on use of face coverings, which essentially provides exceptions for those fully vaccinated in outdoor settings.

May 12, 2021 County of San Mateo moved into the yellow tier rank or "minimal" county risk level.

May 19, 2021 Bay Area Health Officers release statement in support of the California Department of Public Health’s strategy to continue with current masking guidance until June 15, when the State will align with the CDC’s updated masking guidance.

June 3, 2021 Bay Area Health Officers release statement in support the opening of California schools for full time in-person instruction for all grades in the fall of 2021.

June 15, 2021 State of California officially reopens and moves “Beyond the Blueprint” which ends the color- coded reopening tier systems and lifts most restrictions on businesses. Most County of San Mateo offices reopen in-person as well.

July 16, 2021 County of San Mateo Joins Bay Area Counties in recommending masking indoors as precaution against COVID-19, particularly the increased circulation of the Delta variant.

July 19, 2021 City of Foster City began hybrid in-person and virtual City Council meetings.

July 26, 2021 County of San Mateo announces face coverings are required s olely at County -operated facilities.

July 26, 2021 City of Foster City reopened City Hall to the general public for walk-ins during regular business hours from 8:00 AM-5:00 PM, Monday to Friday.

July 29, 2021 City of Foster City announces face coverings are required at all times indoors when visiting City facilities.

August 3, 2021 County of San Mateo issues a health order requiring all individuals, regardless of vaccination status, to wear face coverings when indoors in public settings, with limited exceptions.

August 9, 2021 City of Foster City reopened Recreation Center and began offering indoor programs again.

August 26, 2021 Bay Area Health Officers release statement reaffirming support for full in-person school, given safety measures and flexibility for different approaches to meet the needs and capacities of a of schools and districts.

September 16, 2021 Governor Gavin Newsom signs Assembly Bill 361, as the provisions of Executive Order No. N- 29-20 (as revised by Executive Order No. N -08-21), which modifies the requirements for conducting meetings via teleconference during the COVID -19 pandemic, expire s on September 30, 2021. AB 361 amends the Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to continue using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology as long as there is a “proclaimed state of emergency” by the Governor and certain findings are made regarding the need to conduct teleconferenced meetings.

September 30, 2021 San Mateo County Health announces it will be launching Booster Clinics at the Event Center October 7, 2021 Bay Area Health Officers issue criteria for lifting COVID-19 indoor masking requirements to allow organizations to set those requirements independently.

October 18, 2021 City of Foster City/EMID adopts resolutions so the City Council/EMID Board, Planning Commission, and Committees may continue to conduct meetings as they have been without 93 interruption, allowing for increased accessibility to the public and meeting participants to join in person or via teleconference, as applicable, under AB 361.

December 1, 2021 The California Department of Public Health has published a fact sheet about the Omicron variant. County Health is working with the state to understand potential local impacts.

December 15, 2021 The California Department of Public Health has mandated that everyone in California wear a mask in indoor public spaces and workplaces. The order is in effect December 15, 2021 to January 15, 2022.

January 5, 2022 The California Department of Public Health announces the extension of its mask mandate. The order is in effect December 15, 2021 to February 15, 2022.

January 5, 2022 City of Foster City/EMID announces that City Council, Planning Commission, citizen advisory committees, and other public meetings will be held virtually for the months of January and February starting January 13, 2022.

February 16, 2022 Indoor masking is no longer required by the State or County, except for unvaccinated individuals. Everyone, regardless of vaccination status, must continue to mask indoors in high- risk settings, including public transportation, health care settings, congregate settings like correctional facilities and homeless shelters, long-term care facilities, and in K-12 schools and childcare settings.

March 7, 2022 The City Council returned to in-person hybrid public meetings.

March 14, 2022 Indoor masking is no longer required, though strongly encouraged, at City facilities.

94

Page 1 of 21 ends
← All documents from this meeting