Agenda packet — Foster City City Council, July 20, 2026 (part 1 of 5)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITYORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

To Attend the Meeting in Person:

Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:

Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on nonagenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.

To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:

To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:

During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.

Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:

Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.

Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.

AGENDA
Monday, July 20, 2026 6:30 PM
1 teeetgbyeatopubccoet@ostectyogadbeadepatotetteecodbutotbe read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:

Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.

AGENDA
Monday, July 20, 2026 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF

DIRECTORS

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Stacy Jimenez, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Art Kiesel

4. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.

Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.

5. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.

This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.

5.1. City/EMID Regular Meeting Minutes of June 15, 2026

5.2. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Foster City Zoning Map to Modify the Previously Approved General 2 yy
Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.

5.1. City/EMID Regular Meeting Minutes of June 15, 2026

5.2. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Foster City Zoning Map to Modify the Previously Approved General Development Plan (GDP) for an Approximately 11.87Acre Land Known as Chess Hatch Master Plan Located at 11551159, 11611169, and 11751191 Chess Drive in the CM/PD (Commercial Mix/Planned Development Combining) District with an Amended GDP Removing Office as a Primary Use and Updating Associated Exhibits to Facilitate the Gilead Campus Expansion Project to Allow up to 800,000 Square Feet (SF) of Biotechnology or Research and Development (R&D) Uses with a Reduced Parking Ratio (APNs: 094010500, 094010510, 094010100) Gilead Sciences, Inc RZ20250005 (First Reading and Adoption of Second Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report on June 15, 2026)
a) Adopt Ordinance

5.3. An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Making Various Text Amendments to Chapter 17.78 Accessory Dwelling Units of Title 17, “Zoning” of the Foster City Municipal Code to Ensure Compliance with State Laws Related to Accessory Dwelling Units and Finding the Proposed Amendments Exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline Section 15061(B)(3), Common Sense Exemption and Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 – RZ20260002 (First Reading on June 15, 2026) a) Adopt Ordinance

5.4. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Terminating the Proclamation of Local Emergency Related to Cybersecurity Event a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

5.5. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Temporary Closure of Shell Boulevard Between East Hillsdale Boulevard and South Service Road, Balclutha Drive Between the RoundAbout on the Peninsula Jewish Community Center (PJCC) Campus and Shell Boulevard, and the Temporary Closure of the Shell Boulevard Exit of the South Service Road for Summer Days 2026
a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

5.6. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Adopting the Addendum to the Countywide Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

5.7. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Contract Amendment No.1 in the Amount of $50,000 to the Agreement to Thermal Mechanical Inc. for Citywide Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System Repair for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $200,000 Annually and Finding Project Exempt From Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1Existing Facilities)
a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

5.8. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract Amendment No. 2 in the Amount of $35,000 With Apex Testing Laboratories, Inc. for Testing and Inspection Services on the Foster City Community Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

5.9. a) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving and Adopting the Amended Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 20262027, Effective July 1, 2026; and
b) A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving and Adopting the Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 20262027, Effective July 1, 2026
c) Staff Report
d) Adopt Resolutions

5.10. a) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Master Professional Service Agreements With the Selected TwentyEight (28) Consultants (Blair, Church & Flynn Consulting Engineers, Nichols Consulting Engineers, NV5, Verde Design, Integrated Design 360, CSG Consultants, Ghirardelli Associates, Kier & Wright Civil Engineers and Surveyors, WHB Engineers, HydroScience Engineers, Carollo Engineers, Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Marina Construction Management, Swinerton Management & Consulting, David J. Powers & Associates, HuffmanBroadway Group, TRC Engineers, Consolidated Engineering Laboratories, Inspection Services, Advance Design Consultants, Interface Engineering, Biggs Cardosa Associates, Moffat & Nichol, ZFA Structural Engineers, Fehr & Peers, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, and Traffic Patterns) for OnCall Services in Civil Engineering, Construction Management & Inspection, Materials Testing, Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Engineering, Structural Engineering, and Traffic Engineering and Finding That the Project Is Categorically Exempt Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and
b) A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing the District President to Execute Master ProfessionalServiceAgreementsWiththeSelectedTwentyEight(28) 4 gg
Broadway Group, TRC Engineers, Consolidated Engineering Laboratories, Inspection Services, Advance Design Consultants, Interface Engineering, Biggs Cardosa Associates, Moffat & Nichol, ZFA Structural Engineers, Fehr & Peers, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, and Traffic Patterns) for OnCall Services in Civil Engineering, Construction Management & Inspection, Materials Testing, Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Engineering, Structural Engineering, and Traffic Engineering and Finding That the Project Is Categorically Exempt Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and
b) A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing the District President to Execute Master Professional Service Agreements With the Selected TwentyEight (28) Consultants (Blair, Church & Flynn Consulting Engineers, Nichols Consulting Engineers, NV5, Verde Design, Integrated Design 360, CSG Consultants, Ghirardelli Associates, Kier & Wright Civil Engineers and Surveyors, WHB Engineers, HydroScience Engineers, Carollo Engineers, Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Marina Construction Management, Swinerton Management & Consulting, David J.

Powers & Associates, HuffmanBroadway Group, TRC Engineers, Consolidated Engineering Laboratories, ISI Inspection Services, Advance Design Consultants, Interface Engineering, Biggs Cardosa Associates, Moffatt & Nichol, ZFA Structural Engineers, Fehr & Peers, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, and Traffic Patterns) for OnCall Services in Civil Engineering, Construction Management & Inspection, Materials Testing, Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Engineering, Structural Engineering, and Traffic Engineering and Finding That the Project Is Categorically Exempt Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)
c) Staff Report
d) Adopt Resolutions

5.11. A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing the President to Execute Contract Amendment No. Two (2) to the Vendor Agreement With CD & Power in the Amount of $26,484.18 for the Emergency Generator Replacements Project (CIP 455705) (CEQA Status: Categorically Exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Class 2Existing Facilities))
a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution

6. REPORTS

6.1. Real Estate Economic Market Analysis – Update #2
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report and Provide Policy Direction

6.2. Presentation From County Manager Mike Callagy and Board Supervisor Noelia Corzo on San Mateo County’s Intent to Purchase Real Property Described as 1065 E. Hillsdale Boulevard (APN 094524180) in Foster City With the Intent to Move Its Human Services Agency’s Operations Currently Located at 550 Quarry Road to the City of Foster City
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
63UpdateontheHousingElement20232031ProgramHD2aPotentialRe 5 yp
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report and Provide Policy Direction

6.3. Update on the Housing Element 20232031 Program HD2a Potential ReUse of Commercial Sites a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report and Provide Policy Direction

6.4. Report on Proposed Design Concepts for the City Hall, Police Station, and Fire Station Landscaping Improvements Project (CIP 301720) a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report and Provide Policy Direction

6.5. Community Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) General Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report

7. COMMUNICATIONS

7.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were processed via ACH on June 5 and July 2, 2026, and Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on June 5, June 16, and June 30, 2026
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required

8. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.

9. CLOSED SESSION

9.1. Threat to Public Services or Facilities
Consultation with: (Cory Call, Chief of Police, Caitlin Smith and Pasha Sternberg, Polsinelli PC)

9.2. Report Out from Closed Session

10. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
6 9. CLOSED SESSION

9.1. Threat to Public Services or Facilities
Consultation with: (Cory Call, Chief of Police, Caitlin Smith and Pasha Sternberg, Polsinelli PC)

9.2. Report Out from Closed Session

10. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.

Any attendee wishing a reasonable accommodation at the meeting based on disability should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting to ensure availability; requests made with less notice will still be considered, and the City will provide the requested accommodation or an effective alternative when feasible. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.

That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.

For City Council meetings, members of the public who wish to provide or receive language interpretation during the meeting using their own interpreter, another member of the public, or commercially available interpretation services may request reasonable assistance from the City Clerk Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Reasonable assistance may include arranging space for an interpreter, allowing additional time for interpretation, or helping participants use personal equipment or reasonably access available facilities for interpretation services, provided the interpretation does not disrupt the meeting.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.

City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:

LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:

STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
7 REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:

STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
8 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2026

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER OF CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Regular Meeting of June 15, 2026 of the City Council of the City of Foster City, sitting as said Council and as ex officio the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID), was called to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 620 Foster City Boulevard, Foster City, San Mateo County, California, by Mayor/President Art Kiesel.

This meeting was held as a hybrid meeting.

ROLL CALL
The Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary called the roll:

PRESENT: Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Stacy Jimenez, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Art Kiesel.

ABSENT: None.

STAFF PRESENT: Stefan Chatwin, City/District Manager; Benjamin Stock, City Attorney/District Legal Counsel; Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City/District Manager; Sofia Mangalam, Deputy City Manager; Diane Pitman, Administrative Services Director; Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director; Nate Cruz, Finance Director; Thai-Chau Le, Interim Community Development Director; Cory Call, Police Chief; Eric Cromosini, Police Officer; Kitty Dandan, Financial Services Manager; Tiffany Oren, Recreation Manager; Frank Fanara, Parks Manager; Nori Jabba, Housing and Sustainability Manager; Chuck Venook, Chief Building Official; Garrett Gotthardt, Parks Supervisor; Michael Miller, Fleet Supervisor; Estelle Gobrera, Management Coordinator; Yelena Cappello, Principal Management Analyst; Ryan Marquez, Senior Civil Engineer; Oz Jimenez, Recreation
Coordinator; Maira Blanco, Senior Planner; Kevin McGill, Assistant Planner; Dusty Landwehr, Recreation Coordinator; Daniel Weber, Parks Lead Maintenance Worker; Carlos Valerio, Parks
Maintenance Worker I; Patrick Vizconde, Administrative Assistant; Shuli Chen, Video Technician; and Priscilla Schaus,
Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
9 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF JUNE 21-27, 2026 AS “NATIONAL MOSQUITO CONTROL AWARENESS WEEK.”
Mayor Kiesel presented the Proclamation Declaring the Week of June 21-27, 2026 as “National Mosquito Control Awareness Week” to Rachel Curtis-Robles, San Mateo County Mosquito & Vector Control District Communications Director and San Mateo County Mosquito & Vector Control Board Member Paul Norton.

PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF JULY AS “PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH.”
Councilmember Sullivan presented the Proclamation Declaring the Month of July as “Parks and Recreation Month” to Oz Jimenez, Recreation Coordinator.

PUBLIC
Raymond Goins addressed the City Council regarding Juneteenth.

REPORTS
Without objection from the City Council, Mayor Kiesel moved the San Francisco Peninsula Destination Marketing Organization’s (DMO) New 2025–2028 Strategic Plan item out of agenda order.

SAN FRANCISCO PENINSULA DESTINATION MARKETING ORGANIZATION’S (DMO) NEW 2025–2028 STRATEGIC PLAN. NO ACTION TAKEN.

John Hutar, President & CEO of The San Francisco Peninsula, presented the report.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Vice Mayor/Vice President Niederhofer, seconded by Councilmember/Director Jimenez, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, approving the following items on the City/District Consent Calendar:

City/EMID Consent Calendar

1. City/EMID Regular Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2026;

2. City Resolution No. 2026-058, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City (1) Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election to Be Held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 for the Election of One (1) Member of the City Council for District 1 and One (1) Member of the City Council for District 2; Requesting That the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo Consolidate the General Municipal Election to Be Held on November 3, 2026 with

5.1 5.1 Minutes
10 the Statewide General Election Pursuant to Section 10403 of the Elections Code and to Permit the San Mateo County Registration and Elections Division to Conduct Said Election, and Authorizing the City Clerk to Execute a Service Agreement with the County of San Mateo for Election Services;”

3. City Resolution No. 2026-059, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with CDW Government LLC for the Purchase of Mobile Data Computer (MDC) Replacements for Police Patrol Cars in the Amount of $67,339.23;”

4. City Resolution No. 2026-060, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing a Change to the Previously Approved Appropriation from the Vehicle Replacement Fund (501) to Account No. 501-0560-431-4384, Decreasing the Amount from $88,456 to $78,126 ($10,330 Decrease); Amending the Award for the 2026 Ford Expedition Max Active 4WD Vehicle by Changing Vehicle to the 2027 Ford Expedition XL SSV4 in the Amount of $62,664 and $8,000 for Equipment Installation for a Total of $70,664; And Finding the Purchase Exempt from Review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 15061(B)(3);”

5. City Resolution No. 2026-061, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to the Existing Agreement with West Coast Code Consultants (WC3) for Professional On-Call Building Services for an Additional Amount of $100,000 for a Total Agreement Amount Not to Exceed $250,000, and to Extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2027 and Finding the Request Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(B)(3);”

6. City Resolution No. 2026-062, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the First Amendment to the Concession Agreement with Edgewater Marine LLC for Boat Rental Services, Extending the Agreement through September 30, 2026 and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Amendment;”

7. City Resolution No. 2026-063, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Amendment to the Joint Use Agreement between the City of Foster City/Estero Municipal Improvement District and the San MateoFoster City School District, Extending the Agreement through August 31, 2026, and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Amendment;”

8. EMID Resolution No. 3853, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving the Amendment to the Joint Use Agreement between the City of Foster City/Estero Municipal Improvement District and the San Mateo-Foster City School District, Extending the Agreement through August 31, 2026, and Authorizing the Board President to Execute the Amendment;”

9. City Resolution No. 2026-064, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Adding the New Job Description of Recreation Specialist and Approving Revised Job Descriptions for the Communications Specialist and Senior Building Inspector;”

10.EMID Resolution No. 3854, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Adding the New Job Description of Recreation

5.1 5.1 Minutes
11 Specialist and Approving Revised Job Descriptions for the Communications Specialist and Senior Building Inspector;”

11.City Resolution No. 2026-065, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Adopting an Updated Investment Policy Dated June 15, 2026;”

12.EMID Resolution No. 3855, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Adopting an Updated Investment Policy Dated June 15, 2026”; and

13.EMID Resolution No. 3856, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving a One-Year Extension of the Water/Wastewater Rate Assistance Program (W/WRAP) through June 30, 2027, and Unless Further Extended by the District Board, Will Automatically Sunset at the Conclusion of This Period; And Finding the Approval of the Extension Is Exempt from Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 15061(B)(3).”

ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2017, WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, FOR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY’S FEDERALLY-FUNDED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS IN FISCAL YEARS 2027, 2028, AND 2029 WITH AN AUTOMATIC RENEWAL FOR FISCAL YEARS 2030, 2031, AND 2032. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2026-066.

Without objection from the City Council, Mayor Kiesel removed this item from the Consent Calendar at the request of Councilmember Venkat.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember Venkat, seconded by Councilmember Sullivan, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2026-066, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement Dated September 20, 2017, with the County of San Mateo, for Continued Participation in the County’s Federally-Funded Housing and Community Development Programs in Fiscal Years 2027, 2028, and 2029 with an Automatic Renewal for Fiscal Years 2030, 2031, and 2032.”

PUBLIC HEARINGS
GILEAD CAMPUS EXPANSION MASTER PLAN PROJECT. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2026-067. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2026-068.

Senior Planner Blanco and Interim Community Development Director Le presented the staff report.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
12 Mayor Kiesel opened a public hearing to hear and consider comments regarding the Gilead Campus Expansion Master Plan Project.

No public testimony was received.

Without objection from the City Council, Mayor Kiesel closed the public hearing.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember Sullivan, seconded by Councilmember Venkat, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2026-067, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City to Approve the Second Addendum and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to the Chess-Hatch Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (Sch #2008122065), and Addendum Thereto, for the Proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Project - Up to 800,000 Square Feet of Research and Development (R&D) and Ancillary Uses, Located in the Chess Drive/Hatch Drive Area (APNs: 094-010-500, 094-010-510, 094-010-100) – Gilead Sciences, Inc.- EA2025- 0001.”
Motion by Councilmember Venkat, seconded by Vice Mayor Niederhofer, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, to introduce ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading, and pass ordinance to second reading, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Foster City Zoning Map to Modify the Previously Approved General Development Plan (GDP) for an Approximately 11.87-Acre Land Known as Chess Hatch Master Plan Located at 1155-1159, 1161-1169, and 1175-1191 Chess Drive in the C-M/PD (Commercial Mix/Planned Development Combining) District with an Amended GDP Removing Office as a Primary Use and Updating Associated Exhibits to Facilitate the Gilead Campus Expansion Project to Allow up to 800,000 Square Feet (SF) of Biotechnology or Research and Development (R&D) Uses with a Reduced Parking Ratio (APNs: 094-010-500, 094-010-510, 094-010-100) -- Gilead Sciences, Inc - - RZ2025-0005.”
Motion by Councilmember Jimenez, seconded by Vice Mayor Niederhofer, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2026-068, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Parking Agreement Between the City of Foster City and Gilead Sciences, Inc. for the Proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Project - Up to 800,000 Square Feet of Research and Development (R&D) and Ancillary Uses, Located in the Chess Drive/Hatch Drive Area (APNs: 094-010-500, 094-010-510, 094-010-100) – Gilead Sciences, Inc.” AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 17.78 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS OF TITLE 17, “ZONING” OF THE FOSTER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE

WITH STATE LAWS RELATED TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND FINDING

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS EXEMPT UNDER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINE SECTION 15061(B)(3), COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION AND PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.17 – RZ2026-0002.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
13 Assistant Planner McGill and Housing presented the staff report.

Mayor Kiesel opened a public hearing to hear and consider comments regarding Amendments to Chapter 17.78 Accessory Dwelling Units of Title 17, “Zoning” of the Foster City Municipal Code to Ensure Compliance with State Laws Related to Accessory Dwelling Units and Finding the Proposed Amendments Exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline Section 15061(B)(3), Common Sense Exemption and Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 – RZ2026-0002.

No public testimony was received.

Without objection from the City Council, Mayor Kiesel closed the public hearing.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Vice Mayor Niederhofer, seconded by Councilmember Sullivan, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0-0, to introduce ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading, and pass ordinance to second reading, “An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Making Various Text Amendments to Chapter 17.78 Accessory Dwelling Units of Title 17, “Zoning” of the Foster City Municipal Code to Ensure Compliance with State Laws Related to Accessory Dwelling Units and Finding the Proposed Amendments Exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline Section 15061(B)(3), Common Sense Exemption and Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 – RZ2026-0002” with the change to move the sentence “so long as required by California Government Code Section 66333, or successor code section” from Section

17.78.060(B)(3) to the end of the first sentence of Section 17.78.060(B)(2). 2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND WATER SHORTAGE
CONTINGENCY PLAN. EMID RESOLUTION NO. 3857.

Principal Management Analyst Cappello introduced Tina Wang, Water Resources Engineer from EKI Environment & Water, Inc, who presented the report.

President Kiesel opened a public hearing to hear and consider comments regarding the adoption of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

No public testimony was received.

Without objection from the EMID Board of Directors, President Kiesel closed the public hearing.

Discussion ensued.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
14 Motion by Vice President Niederhofer, seconded by Director Venkat, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting EMID Resolution No. 3857, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and the 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan; And Finding the Approval Exempt from CEQA Pursuant to Section 15282(v).” FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF THE CITY/DISTRICT. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2026-069. EMID RESOLUTION NO. 3858.

Finance Director Cruz presented the staff report.

Mayor/President Kiesel opened a public hearing to hear and consider comments regarding the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Limit of the City/District.

No public testimony was received.

Without objection from the City Council/EMID Board of Directors, Mayor/President Kiesel closed the public hearing.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember/Director Jimenez, seconded by Vice Mayor/Vice President Niederhofer, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2026-069, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Establishing the Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 Appropriations Limit Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution” and EMID Resolution No. 3858, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Establishing the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Appropriations Limit Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.”

FOSTER CITY WORKFORCE VACANCIES, RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION TRENDS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 2561 (AB 2561). MINUTE ORDER NO. 2080.

Administrative Services Director Pitman presented the staff report.

Mayor Kiesel opened a public hearing to hear and consider comments regarding the report on the Foster City Workforce Vacancies, Recruitment and Retention Trends in Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561 (AB 2561).

No public testimony was received.

Without objection from the City Council, Mayor Kiesel closed the public hearing.

Discussion ensued.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
15 Motion by Councilmember Venkat, seconded by Councilmember Sullivan, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting Minute Order No. 2080, receiving and accepting the Report on the Foster City Workforce Vacancies, Recruitment and Retention Trends in Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561 (AB 2561).

REPORTS

INTEGRATED ADAPTIVE CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION QUARTERLY REPORT. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2081.

Parks Manager Fanara introduced Dan Biteman, Senior Biologist from Wildlife Innovations, Inc., who presented the report.

Karen Fong addressed the City Council in person.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Councilmember Sullivan, seconded by Vice Mayor Niederhofer, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting Minute Order No. 2081, receiving and accepting the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan Project Implementation Quarterly Report.

RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION
FISCAL YEARS 2026-27 AND 2027-28 CITY/DISTRICT BUDGET. CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2026-070. EMID RESOLUTION NO. 3859.

Finance Director Cruz presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.

Motion by Vice Mayor/Vice President Niederhofer, seconded by Councilmember/Director Venkat, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2026-070, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Fiscal Year 2026- 27 and 2027-28 City Budget,” and EMID Resolution No. 3859, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving the Fiscal Year 2026- 27 and 2027-28 District Budget.”

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILDLIFE INNOVATIONS, INC. FOR CONTINUED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTEGRATED ADAPTIVE CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CEQA STATUS:

IS/MND APPROVED ON DECEMBER 2, 2024). CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2026-071.

Parks Manager Fanara presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
16 Motion by Councilmember Venkat, seconded by Councilmember Sullivan, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution No. 2026-071, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Wildlife Innovations, Inc. for Continued Implementation of the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan (CEQA Status: IS/MND Approved on December 2, 2024).”

COMMUNICATIONS
CITY/DISTRICT WARRANT OF DEMANDS. NO ACTION TAKEN.

City/District Warrant of Demands were Processed and Issued on May 28, 2026.

CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND

REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
Councilmember/Director Sullivan stated he attended the City’s Employee Luncheon on June 10 and the San Mateo Union High School District Board meeting on June 11. He announced he will be on vacation from June 25 to July 10.

Councilmember/Director Venkat stated she attended the Citizen Sustainability Advisory Committee meeting on June 10. On June 12, she attended the San Mateo-Foster City School District Partner Luncheon. She reminded the public that there will be a Juneteenth celebration event hosted by the Foster City Association of Black Residents and Island United Church on June 20, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m., at the Community Center Annex.

Councilmember/Director Jimenez thanked the City’s FISH/Wellness Committee for organizing the Employee Luncheon on June 10. On June 11, she attended the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) Board meeting.

She attended the League of California Cities Peninsula Division Partner Appreciation Brunch on June 13, and the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority (SMCEL-JPA) Board meeting on June 15, where she was elected as Vice Chair for the upcoming year.

Vice Mayor/Vice President Niederhofer thanked the City’s FISH/Wellness Committee for the Employee Luncheon on June 10. She congratulated Police Chief Call for 25 years of service with the City. She attended the SFO Community Roundtable meeting on June 3, and the Planning Commission meeting on June 4, where Commissioner Stoveland was selected as Chair and Commissioner Kenkre was selected as Vice Chair.

Mayor/President Kiesel stated he attended the Edgewater Marine Mixer with The San Francisco Peninsula on June 3 and the Leadership Council San Mateo County (SMC) Emerging Leader Program Graduation on June 5. On June 68, he spoke with residents at the Atria Senior Living Center at Foster Square. On June 8, he and attended the San Mateo County Library Joint Powers Authority Governing Board meeting, where they

5.1 5.1 Minutes
17 adopted their budget for FY 2026-27. On June 12, he attended the San Mateo-Foster City School District Partner Luncheon.

CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Kiesel recessed the meeting into Closed Session for:

1. Conference With Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9):Rosario Rodela Solaita v.

Foster City et al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 3:26- cv-04517;

2. Conference With Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9):Tuilatai Sabastiano Sevelo Jr. v. Foster City, San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 26CIV03897;

3. Conference With Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9): County of San Mateo, et al. v. State of California et al., San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CPF-25- 519270 (VLF Litigation); and

4. Report out of Closed Session.

Meeting recessed into Closed Session at 10:09 p.m. and reconvened at 10:37 p.m.

City Attorney/District Legal Counsel Stock reported that no action was taken in Closed Session.

ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no objection from the City Council/EMID Board, Mayor/President Kiesel adjourned the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 10:37 p.m.

5.1 5.1 Minutes
18 ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY AMENDING

THE FOSTER CITY ZONING MAP TO MODIFY THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP) FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 11.87-ACRE LAND KNOWN AS CHESS HATCH MASTER PLAN LOCATED AT 1155-1159, 1161- 1169, AND 1175-1191 CHESS DRIVE IN THE C-M/PD (COMMERCIAL MIX/PLANNED

DEVELOPMENT COMBINING) DISTRICT WITH AN AMENDED GDP REMOVING

OFFICE AS A PRIMARY USE AND UPDATING ASSOCIATED EXHIBITS TO

FACILITATE THE GILEAD CAMPUS EXPANSION PROJECT TO ALLOW UP TO 800,000 SQUARE FEET (SF) OF BIOTECHNIOLOGY OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) USES WITH A REDUCED PARKING RATIO (APNs: 094-010- 500, 094-010-510, 094-010-100) -- GILEAD SCIENCES, INC -- RZ2025-0005

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2009, the City Council certified a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Chess-Hatch Master Plan (“Approved Project”) and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) through Resolution No. 2009-91 for the Project in pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, the lead agency of Foster City (“City”) prepared an Addendum to the EIR to analyze the potential environmental impacts of changes to the Approved Project and the Initial Study/Addendum (First Addendum) was completed and adopted in 2013 by Resolution No. P-15-13; and
WHEREAS, on September 3, 2013, the City Council approved an Ordinance approving an amendment to the Foster City Zoning Map and a GDP for the +/- 11.89 gross acres to change the zoning designation from M-1/PD (Light Industrial/Planned Development) to C-M/PD with a GDP to allow up to 800,000 SF of Office, Biotechnology, or Research and Development (R&D) uses (Ordinance 573); and WHEREAS, on February 14, 2025, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Applicant”) submitted a Preliminary Review (PR2025-0003) application for the proposed Gilead Campus Expansion project (“Project”) on the subject 11.87-acre property; and WHEREAS, subsequently, the applicant submitted applications for: (i) an Environmental Assessment (EA2025-0001) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project; (ii) a General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment (RZ2025-0005) to amend the Chess Hatch GDP to remove office as a primary use and allow up to 800,000 SF or biotechnology and Research and Development (R&D) use; (iii) a Use Permit (UP2025-0012) to allow the construction of Phase 1, including an approximately 175,000 SF R&D building with ancillary uses, and (iv) a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map Application relocating one (1) existing parcel line and documenting disposition of existing and created easements to facilitate the proposed project located at Chess Drive/Hatch Drive area; and

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
19 WHEREAS, the Applicant requested to remove office use from the allowable uses, without changing the total developable square footage of 800,000 SF and will require the approval of amendment to the Foster City Zoning Map to modify the previously approved GDP in the C-M/PD District with an amended GDP removing office as a primary use and updating associated exhibits to facilitate the Project; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is requesting a reduced parking ratio of 1.2 space/1000 SF and a further reduction of 15% with an adequate Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted a parking study and TDM plan to support the reduced parking ratio for the project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the CEQA, the City prepared an Initial Study (“IS”) to analyze and disclose all potential environmental impacts associated with a Project; and WHEREAS, when a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared, an addendum can be prepared to build on or “tier” from the previous analysis if it meets CEQA Guidelines Section 15164; and WHEREAS, none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent environmental document have occurred; and
WHEREAS, the IS is a project-level analysis and includes all applicable technical reports for the proposed Project and based on this analysis, it was determined that the Project did not meet the criteria in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, for the above noted reasons, a Second Addendum to the ChessHatch Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (“Second Addendum”) was prepared; and
WHEREAS, where appropriate, the Second Addendum evaluates new significance criteria using the environmental checklist questions in Appendix G of the 2025 CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, full public involvement in the review of the Project has been ensured through duly noticed Planning Commission Study Sessions, Planning Commission and City Council public hearings and other means, including the following:
 On May 19, 2025, the City Council approved Task Order PLWS-2025-01 with PlaceWorks, Inc. to provide environmental review and documentation (Initial Study) for the Project.
 On June 16, 2025, a Gatekeeper Meeting was held at a City Council hearing to introduce the preliminary Project proposal, review the preliminary transportation study results, provide an overview of the anticipated environmental analysis and required studies, and seek input on the proposed Project and the associated environmental review.

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
20  On December 4, 2025, Planning Commission Study Session #1 to formally introduce the Project and the requested entitlements and to seek public input.  On February 5, 2026, Planning Commission Study Session #2 to respond to questions and comments presented by the Planning Commission on December 4, 2025, Study Session and to review next steps.
 On April 23, 2026, Planning Commission Study Session #3 to review and provide input on the Environmental Assessment and Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed Project.
 On May 21, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the following actions and recommendations: 1) a resolution of the Planning Commission recommending the City Council approve the Second Addendum to the Chess-Hatch Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR, SCH#2008122065), and addenda thereto, with the proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Master Plan Project - up to 800,000 square feet (SF) of research and development (R&D) and ancillary uses, located in the Chess Drive/Hatch Drive area (EA2025-0001), 2) a resolution of the Planning Commission approving a Specific Development Plan/Use Permit to allow the construction of Phase 1 of the proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Master Plan Project, including an approximately 175,000 SF research and development building (‘New Chess Facility/B1165 Building’) with ancillary uses, located in the Chess Drive/Hatch Drive area, 3) a resolution of the Planning Commission recommending the City Council approve an ordinance amending the Foster City Zoning Map to modify the previously approved General Development Plan (GDP) for an approximately

11.87-acre land known as Chess Hatch Master Plan located at 1155-1159, 1161- 1169, and 1175-1191 Chess Drive in the C-M/PD (Commercial Mix/Planned Development Combining) District with an amended GDP removing office as a primary use and updating associated exhibits to facilitate the proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Project (RZ2025-0005); and 4) a resolution of the Planning Commission approving a Vesting Tentative Map relocating one (1) existing parcel line and documenting disposition of existing and created easements to facilitate the proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Project located at Chess Drive/Hatch Drive area (RS2025-0002).

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is required by state law to hold at least one (1) public hearing before recommending adoption of an amendment to the City’s Zoning Map and the current GDP; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing was duly published on June 3, 2026, in the Foster City Islander for consideration of the General Development Plan Amendment at the City Council meeting of June 15, 2026; and on said date the Public Hearing was opened, held and closed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Second Addendum, all of the CEQA documents, staff reports, supplemental memorandums, and background reports on May 21, 2026, and all relevant evidence in the record and recommended City Council approval of the Second Addendum and MMRP to the Chess Hatch Master Plan EIR and addenda thereto, with the proposed project, by the adoption of Resolution P-06-26; and

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
21 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed all of the plans, CEQA documents, staff reports, supplemental memorandums, and background reports on May 21, 2026, and all relevant evidence in the record and recommended City Council approval of the ordinance to approve the General Development Plan Amendment by adoption of Resolution P-07-26; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed GDP Amendment and the City Council’s review of Addendum No. 2, the City Council has independently reviewed all of the CEQA documents in the record and has exercised its independent judgment in making the findings and determinations set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Foster City carefully reviewed and considered the staff report and all attachment thereto presented as part of the agenda for the public hearing regarding the proposed ordinance to amend the Foster City Zoning Map any and all timely submitted correspondence, all information submitted at or prior to the public hearing, and all public comment and testimony presented at the public hearing (collectively, the Record).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council does hereby find and determine based upon the aforementioned Record as follows:

A. The Public Hearing was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with State law (Government Code Section 65854) and the Foster City Municipal Code; and B. Pursuant to Foster City Municipal Code Section 17.36.030.E, a. The planned development complies with the applicable provisions of the adopted city general plan, because it is consistent with General Plan goals and policies, including LUC-C-9 Parcels Adjacent to Waterways, LUC-C-12-a Periodic Monitoring of Land Uses Throughout the City, LUC-C-13 Conformance with Chapter 17.68, LUC-D-1 Meeting Commercial and Industrial Land Use Needs, LUC-D-9 Design Review of Commercial and Industrial Projects, LUC-D-10 Health and Safety Performance Standards for Industrial and Commercial Activities, LUCD-11 Businesses Using Hazardous Materials, LUC-E-5 Access to New Commercial and Industrial Projects, LUC-F-1 Traffic Level of Service Standards, LUC-F-3 Employer-based Trip Reduction, LUC-G Provide Adequate Parking, LUC-G-1 Parking and Internal Circulation in Project Design, LUC-G-5 Bicycle Parking, LUC-H-2 Reduce GHG Emissions, LUC-H-5-a Tree and Landscape Program, LUC-K-1 Redevelopment Opportunities, and LUC-K-2 Consistency with City’s Infrastructure. b. The planned development complies with the city’s applicable objective design and development standards because the Project was evaluated and found consistent with the provisions of applicable FCMC regulations

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
22 and Chess Hatch Design Principles, incorporating proper site planning and architectural design per LUC-B, and would not result in more visual impacts in the Second Addendum as it pertains to building design (i.e., massing and glare) and operations than the certified EIR. In particular, the Phase 1 building would be a two-story lab building in the middle of the overall project site to accommodate large equipment for intended tasks and is proposed to be built in the middle of the project site to reduce vibration/noise impacts from the roadways. The building would be solid and rectangular in form so that the floor plates are similar in size and the curves, angles, arcades and cantilevers would act as punctuation to the overall design. Future Phase 2 will feature two taller signature buildings acting as bookends to define the campus edges and reinforce its identity, including an eight-story gateway building at the intersection of Foster City Boulevard and Chess Drive will mark the campus arrival. The Project, as conditioned, shall incorporate architectural screening for the Phase 2 parking structure to ensure appropriate shielding from city gateways. Furthermore, Phase 2 R&D buildings would be required to continue to implement mitigation measure VIS-1a and VIS-1b along with conditions of approval that would require project-specific design review at time of proposal. Furthermore, the Project is proposing development standards included in Exhibit A to support the development of the site.
c. Utility and service providers have verified that the proposed facilities will meet the needs of the population densities and land uses proposed. The Water Supply Assessment was provided by the applicant and reviewed by Estero Municipal Improvement District. As part of the environmental assessment, a Utility Impact Study was also prepared to confirm EMID’s existing sewer system has the capacity to support both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the proposed Project and future cumulative conditions and if any repairs to the system would be necessary to accommodate the proposed project plus future cumulative conditions.
d. The proposed ratios for off-street parking are consistent with the parking regulations of the city, as provided in Chapter 17.62 because FCMC Section 17.36.060 allows for deviation from parking standards based on (1) parking analysis and (2) transportation systems management plan (TSM)/travel demand management (TDM) plan. The Applicant has provided the required parking study pursuant to Section 17.36.060 demonstrating how and why the proposed parking ratio of 1.2 spaces per 1,000 SF would work with the new campus, and was made part of the record. The Applicant also submitted a TDM program (Exhibit D) employing all of the amenities and incentives known to reduce singleoccupancy vehicle trips to the campus. The parking analysis includes a parking demand study that demonstrates that the demand for the proposed use is less than the minimum off-street parking otherwise required per the Code as indicated by collecting parking data from a similar campus (South Campus) at the main Gilead campus. Staff will continue to be monitored through the implementation of the TDM plan.

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
23 Section 3. That the Foster City Zoning Map is amended to modify the previously approved GDP for an approximately 11.87-acre land known as Chess Hatch Master Plan located at 1155-1159, 1161-1169, and 1175-1191 Chess Drive in the C-M/PD (Commercial Mix/Planned Development Combining) District with an amended GDP removing office as a primary use and updating associated exhibits to facilitate the proposed Gilead Campus Expansion Project (APNs: 094-010-500, 094-010-510, 094-010-100) as shown on Exhibits A, B, C, D and E, attached hereto and incorporated herein and subject to the conditions of approval as shown on Exhibit C, attached and hereto and incorporated herein.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter is held to be invalid or unconstitutional including by any court with jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this article. The City Council declares that it would have passed this article, and each section, subsection, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, clauses, or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its final passage.

Section 6. Posting. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall have it posted in three (3) public places designated by the City Council.

This Ordinance was introduced and read on the 15th day of June, 2026, and passed and adopted on the 20th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________

ART KIESEL, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
24 EXHIBIT A: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

AMENDED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR

FOR THE GILEAD CAMPUS EXPANSION MASTER PLAN PROJECT
(FORMERLY CHESS HATCH MASTER PLAN)
APNs: 094-00-500, 094-00-510, 094-010-100
Description: The CM/PD (Commercial Mix/Planned Development) District of the ±11.87-acre lands bounded by Foster City Boulevard, Chess Drive, Foster City Lagoon and State Route 92 (APN: 094-010-100, -500, -510). The project site contains a General Development Plan to allow up to 800,000 square feet of biotechnology or research and development uses, a multistory parking structure and at-grade parking lots in two phases; accessory uses, such as commercial, industrial or light assembly uses which are incidental or supportive to the primary biotechnology or research and development uses; or other uses which, in the opinion of the planning director, are similar to and no more offensive than the above-listed uses; with up to 5,000 square feet of the total Project square footage to be used for retail, restaurant or other business-supporting ancillary commercial amenities; except that the following uses are excluded:
housing, schools, day care, and other uses primarily serving children.

GILEAD CAMPUS EXPANSION MASTER PLAN
Zoning C-M/PD (Commercial Mix/Planned Development)
Uses
Permitted Uses:  Biotechnology or Research and Development and accessory uses which are incidental or supportive
to the primary use;
 Up to 5,000 square feet of business-supporting
ancillary use.

Prohibited Uses Housing, schools, day care, and other uses primarily serving children.

Site Development Standards
Front Setback along Chess Drive 30 feet
Setback along Foster City Blvd 20 feet
Setback along HWY 92 20 feet
Setback along City lagoon 20 feet
Side Setback for Parcel 3 (North of
the site)
20 feet
Max Height 190 Feet
Massing Step down in height from north to south (Foster City lagoon to Foster City Blvd) to create a gradual transition in scale.

Max FAR (Full Build-Out) 1.55
Parking Ratio 1.2 Spaces/1,000 SF for R&D with 15% reduction for TDM plan (see Note)
Other standards
Gateway Landscape Area and
public-facing amenity
Corner of Chess Drive and Foster City Boulevard
Activation of Foster City Lagoon Onsite lagoon edge, in northwest direction.

Note: Parking Ratio pursuant to approved parking reduction study and TDM plan

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
25 EXHIBIT B: PHASING

The project includes two (2) development phases:

 Phase 1: Construction of up to a maximum 200,000-square-foot square feet, twostory research and development lab building with ancillary office uses and surface parking.
 Phase 2: Construction of up to 600,000 square feet of R&D uses and a multi-story parking structure.
 Maximum 800,000, total campus square footage. Remaining square footage from Phase 1 may be utilized for Phase 2.

The site layout is provided to generally depict phasing, the location of proposed building massing, gateway landscape area, and lagoon-edge activation, as follows:

o Massing. Buildings to visually step down from north to south (Foster City lagoon to Foster City Blvd).
o Gateway Landscape Area and public-facing amenity [Note 1]. On the corner of Chess Drive and Foster City Boulevard, the project shall include an onsite public-facing amenity, in addition to landscaping. Refer to Condition No. 9 of Exhibit C. o Activation of Foster City Lagoon [Note 2]. The project shall incorporate an activated lagoon edge along the Foster City lagoon through enhanced landscaping and site design that responds to the area adjacent to the lagoon. This may include a pathway or other similar usable outdoor area to be utilized by Gilead employees. Final design shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. Refer to Condition No. 13 of Exhibit C.
o Garage: Garage structure shall not front Chess Drive.

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
26 EXHIBIT C: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. A use permit(s) shall be issued prior to development of any new buildings/structures pursuant to Foster City Municipal Code Section 17.36.040, as amended.

2. An application for a use permit shall include and be accompanied by a specific development plan pursuant to FCMC Section 17.36.050, as amended.

3. Compliance with MMRP. In all phases of the project, the Project applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with Gilead Campus Expansion Master Plan Project Addendum on _____ by City Council (Reso. No. _____).

4. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan. A fifteen percent (15%) reduction in required parking will be permitted in accordance with the implementation of the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan on file (Exhibit D of this GDP Ordinance ___) and in accordance with the Parking Agreement with the City, and shall be maintained for the life of the project. In addition, the parking ratio for R&D in the Gilead Sciences Campus Expansion Master Plan Project will be 1.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of Research and Development space. The applicant shall provide annual compliance reports to the CDD Director.

5. Unless expressly provided otherwise in the PD zoning ordinance, the general provisions of the city zoning ordinance which apply to all zones also apply to PD districts.

6. The Use Permit (UP2025-0012) associated with the implementation of the Gilead Campus Expansion Master Plan Project includes a Vesting Tentative Map (RS2025-0002).

Pursuant to Section 16.32.050, as amended, a Vesting Tentative Map shall be valid for period of twelve (12) months. Therefore, the Use Permit shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of approval or conditional approval by the Planning Commission. Such approval or conditional approval may be extended for a period not to exceed two additional years by the planning commission upon written request, providing such request is made prior to the expiration of the one-year approval or conditional approval period, per Section

16.32.050, as amended.

7. Amendments.

A. Changes in the Gilead Campus Expansion Master Plan Project General Development Plan shall be considered the same as changes in the zoning map, and shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 17.74, as amended.

B. Changes to the Use Permit (UP2025-0012) shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 17.06, as amended.

8. Hazardous Materials List. The Project applicant shall provide the Community Development Director and Fire Chief a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) indicating handling and transporting of materials and spills prevention and response plan; and a hazardous materials list of all hazardous materials used on site prior to Certificate of Occupancy (of Phase 1 and Phase 2). If new hazardous materials not on the list are utilized onsite, the applicant shall provide the Community Development Director and Fire Chief, an updated HMBP and hazardous materials list, for the life of the project.

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
27 Phase 1:

9. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the Project applicant shall submit a design concept and site layout for the public-facing amenity open space (‘Gateway Landscape Area’) to be located at the corner intersection of Foster City Boulevard and Chess Drive. In addition to landscaping, the design concept shall include signage and physically permanent interactive amenities that connect the public realm with the open space and/or include other visual interest elements that provide an interactive experience. The final concept and site layout shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director.

Phase 2:

10. Circulation Analysis. Prior to approval of Phase 2 development by the Planning Commission or appropriate decision-making body, the applicant shall retain a qualified professional to conduct an on-site circulation analysis to confirm the proposed site ingress/egress locations are adequate. The analysis shall identify any necessary modifications to improve site circulation. The analysis shall also identify any necessary modifications, including potential relocation of driveways or implementation of turning restrictions on the westernmost driveway on Chess Drive. The analysis shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and the applicant shall make any modifications determined by the City Engineer to be necessary to improve circulation at ingress/egress locations.

11. Garage Screening. The Project applicant shall incorporate façade screening into the design of the multi-story parking structure. The parking structure screening shall be of compatible materials (in terms of color palette and materiality of Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildings) and screen openings on the parking structure’s façades such that no vehicles are visible from any floors when viewed from Foster City Boulevard or Highway 92.

12. Garage Location. At no time shall the parking garage structure be placed fronting Chess Drive.

13. Enhance lagoon edge on Project site. The final concept will be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director with the Phase 2 Use Permit. After issuance of Building Permit for construction but prior to Certificate of Occupancy of first Phase 2 building, the Project shall incorporate design features to treat the lagoon edge. This may include a pathway or other similar usable outdoor area to be utilized by Gilead employees.

14. Public Improvements
a. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prior to approval of any subsequent phases of development (Phase 2), the applicant shall conduct a subsequent Traffic Impact Analysis utilizing LOS and ensuring the Project does not incur an additional 4 second delay or greater at any of the following intersections that is operating unacceptably without the Project per adopted Foster City Land Use and Circulation Element dated February 1, 2016.

1. Foster City Boulevard/Vintage Park Drive-Chess Drive

2. Vintage Park Drive/Chess Drive

3. SR 92 WB Ramps/Chess Drive

4. Foster City Boulevard/Chess Drive

5. SR 92 EB Ramps/Metro Center Boulevard

6. Foster City Boulevard/Metro Center Boulevard

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
28 If a 4 second delay or greater is identified, physical improvements to the intersections may be necessary to minimize intersection delays caused by the Project. Any improvements, if needed, would be the responsibility of the applicant to install and in proportion to the Project's fair share contribution to the delay. If Foster City adopts a new Land Use Circulation Element prior to Phase 2, the project will be subject to the new Element.

15. Signage. New onsite signs shall follow the sign review process in Section 17.59.040, as amended, of the Municipal Code.

16. Tree Removal and Site Disturbance. Prior to tree removal of ground disturbance, whichever occurs first, that may directly or indirectly affect nesting raptors and other protected avian species shall be timed to avoid the breeding and nesting seasons (February 1 through August 31). If construction activities must occur during the breeding and nesting season, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting raptors and other protected avian species within 300 feet of the proposed construction activities. Pre-construction surveys should be conducted no more than seven (7) days prior to the start of tree removal and/or the construction activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through April) and no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding season (May through August). If raptors or other protected avian nests are identified during the preconstruction surveys, the qualified biologist would notify the project proponent and an appropriate no-disturbance buffer would be imposed within which no construction activities or disturbance would take place (generally 300 feet in all directions for raptors; other avian species may have species-specific requirements) until the young of the year have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the nest or parental care for survival, as determined by a qualified biologist. If no raptors or other protected avian nests are identified during the pre-construction surveys, construction activities, including vegetation and/or tree removal, may proceed with measures/recommendations as determined by the qualified biologist.

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
29 EXHIBIT D: TDM Plan

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
30 5.2

5.2 Ordinance
31 5.2

5.2 Ordinance
32 5.2

5.2 Ordinance
33 5.2

5.2 Ordinance
34 5.2

5.2 Ordinance
35 EXHIBIT E: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
Real property in the City of Foster City, County of San Mateo, State of California, described as follows:

PARCEL 1:

LOT 7, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "TRACT NO. 820 FOSTER CITY INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 1 IN UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA", FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON JANUARY 15, 1964 IN BOOK 59 OF MAPS AT PAGE(S) 35, 36 AND 37.APN: 094-010-100
PARCEL 2:

ALL OF PARCEL A, AS SAID PARCEL IS DELINEATED AND SO DESIGNATED UPON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "PARCEL MAP 11-73, IN THE INCORPORATED TERRITORY OF

THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 820, FOSTER CITY INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 1, RECORDED IN VOLUME 59 OF MAPS PAGES 35, SAN

MATEO COUNTY RECORDS AND ALSO BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL "A", TRACT NO. 801, FOSTER CITY NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 1. UNIT NO. 1, RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF MAPS AT PAGES 32 TO 41, SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS, FOSTER CITY SAN MATEO CO. CALIFORNIA", FILED FOR RECORD DECEMBER 10, 1973, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 23
OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 8, RECORDS OF SAID SAN MATEO COUNTY.

PARCEL 3:

ALL OF PARCEL "B", AS SAID PARCEL IS DELINEATED AND SO DESIGNATED UPON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "PARCEL MAP 11-73, IN THE INCORPORATED

TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 820, FOSTER CITY INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 1, RECORDED IN VOLUME 59 OF MAPS PAGE 35, SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS AND ALSO BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 'A' TRACT NO. 801, FOSTER CITY NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 1, UNIT NO. 1, RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF MAPS AT PAGES 32 TO 41, SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS, FOSTER CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA", FILED FOR RECORD DECEMBER 10, 1973, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 23 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 8, RECORDS OF SAID SAN MATEO COUNTY.

APN(S): 094-010-500 AND 094-010-510

5.2 5.2 Ordinance
36 ORDINANCE NO.____________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY MAKING VARIOUS TEXT AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 17.78 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS OF TITLE 17, “ZONING” OF THE FOSTER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE

WITH STATE LAWS RELATED TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND FINDING

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS EXEMPT UNDER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINE SECTION 15061(B)(3), COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION AND PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.17 – RZ2026-0002

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Law authorizes local jurisdictions to act by ordinance to provide for the creation and regulation of accessory dwelling units (“ADUs”) and junior accessory dwelling units (“JADUs”); and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 2026, four (4) key ADU bills became effective:

California Assembly Bill No. 462 (AB 462), California Assembly Bill No. 1154 (AB 1154), California Senate Bill No. 9 (SB 9), and California Senate Bill 543 (SB 543); and WHEREAS, these bills make further revisions to state law, and local jurisdictions need to readopt any local ordinances related to ADUs to include new provisions/clarifications; and
WHEREAS, these bills make further revisions to state law, and local jurisdictions need to readopt any local ordinances related to ADUs to include new provisions/clarifications; and
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, a Joint City Council/Planning Commission Special Meeting Study Session was held to update the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the public on the most recent State Laws affecting land use and ADUs; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Element is an integral part of the Foster City General Plan that identifies the community’s housing needs, states the community’s goals and objectives regarding housing production, rehabilitation, preservation, and conservation to meet those needs, and defines the policies and programs; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element Programs include the City’s commitment to timeframes for implementation and the Annual Progress Report (APR) to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), due by April 1st of each year, reports on progress in implementation of these Programs; and WHEREAS, amendments to Foster City Municipal Code, Title 17, Zoning are required for the implementation of the Housing Element program, H-D-4-a; and

5.3 5.3 Ordinance
37 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider a Resolution regarding the amendments to Chapter 17.78, and after conducting the public hearing, adopted Resolution No. P-11-26 with the Planning Commission recommending City Council approval of the amendments to Chapter 17.78; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2026, a public hearing notice was published and posted in three public places, and mailed pursuant to California Code Section 65090 for the City Council public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing where it carefully reviewed and considered the staff report and all attachments thereto, including the Planning Commission’s recommendation regarding the proposed amendments to various sections of Chapter 17.78, “Accessory Dwelling Units”, of Title 17, “Zoning” of the Foster City Municipal Code, to ensure compliance with State law related to ADUs and the associated CEQA finding, including any and all timely submitted correspondence, all information submitted at or prior to the public hearing, and all public comment and testimony presented at the public hearing (collectively, the “Record”).

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY DOES FIND AND ORDAIN as follows:

Section 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine based upon the aforementioned Record as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action; and

2. The proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies, or programs of the General Plan; and

3. The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan through the implementation of the Housing Element; and

4. The proposed Zoning amendments comply with and are required by applicable State laws; and

5. The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City; and
Section 2. The proposed actions would update the City’s existing Municipal Code to align with the requirements of the most recent updates to the State’s laws. The actions would not result in physical changes to the environment. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption. Additionally, Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 states that CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance to implement the provisions of Article 2 (commencing with Section 66314) or Article 3 (commencing with Section 66333) of Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of, the Government Code, which means that adoption

5.3 5.3 Ordinance
38 of this ordinance to update the Municipal Code to implement State ADU and JADU law is statutorily exempt from CEQA.

Section 3. Amendment. Various Sections of Chapter 17.78 “Accessory Dwelling Units” within Title 17, “Zoning” of the Foster City Municipal Code are hereby amended by repealing the existing sections Chapter 17.78 in their entirety and replacing those sections to read as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Those Sections within Chapter 17.78 not specifically replaced in Exhibit A (Sections 17.78.010 (Findings), 17.78.020 (Purpose), 17.78.030 (Application), 17.78.070 (Standards applicable to multifamily residence zoning districts), and 17.78.075 (Standards applicable to public facilities (PF) zoning districts)), shall remain unchanged in Chapter 17.78.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council does hereby declare that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. Taking Effect. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

Section 6. Posting. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall have it posted in three (3) public places designated by the City Council.

This Ordinance was introduced and read on the 15th day of June, 2026, and passed and adopted on the 20th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.3 5.3 Ordinance
39 Chapter 17.78

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Sections:

17.78.040 Definitions.

17.78.050 Permit application for an accessory dwelling unit.

17.78.060 Standards applicable to single-family residence zoning districts.

17.78.080 Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units.

17.78.090 Permit process.

17.78.100 Other provisions.

17.78.110 Appeal.

17.78.040 Definitions.

A. “Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:

1. An efficiency unit.

2. A manufactured home, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 18007.

3. Size limitations of ADUs is based on the square feet of interior living space of the ADU.

B. “Accessory structure” means a structure that is accessory and incidental to a dwelling located on the same lot.

C. “Attached accessory dwelling unit” means an ADU that is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e., addition) of an existing single-family residence and shares at least one wall with the single-family residence.

D. “Business Days” means regular days of business operations that excludes Saturday, Sunday, and holidays specified in Gov Code 6700 & 6701.

E. “Conversion accessory dwelling unit” means an ADU that is created within existing space, including a portion of a primary dwelling unit or existing non-habitable space in an existing primary or accessory structure.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
40 F. “Days” means a calendar day, representing a 24-hour period beginning at midnight.

In computations of time, this means every day on the calendar, including weekends and holidays, unless the law specifically states "business days".

G. “Detached accessory dwelling unit” means an ADU that is constructed as a separate structure from the primary dwelling unit and does not share any walls with the primary dwelling unit or an existing attached accessory structure.

H. “Efficiency unit” has the same meaning as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.1.

I. “High-quality transit corridor” means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than fifteen minutes during peak commute hours.

J. “Infeasible” shall mean when applicable development standards are applied, they would physically preclude development of a proposed ADU up to eight hundred fifty square feet with at least four-foot side and rear yard setbacks.

K. “Interior livable space” shall mean a space in a dwelling intended for human habitation, including living, sleeping, eating, cooking, or sanitation. Livable space includes bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchens, laundry rooms, closets, and interior stairs.

L. “Junior accessory dwelling unit” or “JADU” means a unit that is no more than five hundred square feet of interior livable space and contained entirely within a singlefamily residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure.

M. “Living area” means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics but does not include a garage or any accessory structure or building.

N. “Major transit stop” has the same meaning as defined in California Public Resources Code Section 21155.

O. “Objective standards” means standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.

P. “Passageway” means a pathway that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance of the ADU.

Q. “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
41 R. “State exempt unit” means an ADU or JADU that is constructed pursuant to Government Code Section 66323 and is not subject to Government Code Sections 66314 through 66322. State exempt units shall be subject exclusively to the provisions of Government Code Section 66323, notwithstanding any contrary requirements set forth in Sections 17.78.060, 17.78.070, and 17.78.080.

S. “Tandem parking” means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another. (Ord. 692 § 3 (Exh. A), 2025; Ord. 684 § 2 (Exh. I), 2024; Ord. 669 § 2 (Exh. A), 2023)

17.78.050 Permit application for an accessory dwelling unit.

The application for an ADU permit shall be made by the owners of the subject property in writing to the building division in the form designated by the building division and shall contain the following:

A. Completed building permit application form and applicable fee; B. Written project description;
C. Plans, drawings, and reports as required by the Foster City ADU Checklist;;and D. A copy of required deed restriction as included in Section 17.78.100, unless exempt. (Ord. 684 § 2 (Exh. I), 2024; Ord. 669 § 2 (Exh. A), 2023)

17.78.060 Standards applicable to single-family residence zoning districts.

The following shall apply to single-family lots in R-1, R-2 and R-1/PD zoning districts:

A. Number of Units. A single-family lot with a primary dwelling unit may have:

1. Option 1. One JADU (up to five hundred square feet); or

2. Option 2. One ADU (conversion, attached, or detached); or

3. Option 3.
a. One JADU (up to five hundred square feet); and
b. One conversion ADU; and
c. One newly constructed ADU (attached or detached, up to eight hundred fifty square feet).

4. Option 4.
a. One JADU (up to five hundred square feet); and
b. One newly constructed ADU over eight hundred fifty square feet.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
42 5. Option 5.
a. One JADU (up to five hundred square feet); and
b. One conversion ADU.

6. Option 6.
a. One JADU (up to five hundred square feet); and
b. One newly constructed ADU (up to eight hundred fifty square feet).

7. Option 7.
a. One conversion ADU; and
b. One newly constructed ADU (up to eight hundred fifty square feet).

B. Junior Accessory Dwelling Units.

1. The number of JADUs shall be limited to one unit per residential lot zoned for single-family residences that includes a proposed or existing single-family residence.

2. The property owner must reside in either the remaining portion of the primary dwelling unit or the JADU only if the JADU does not have an independent sanitary facility (e.g. restroom), so long as required by California Government Code Section 66333, or successor code section. Owner occupancy shall not be required if the owner is another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization.

3. The owner must record a deed restriction as outlined in California Government Code Section 66333, which shall run with the land, and shall include the following:
a. A prohibition on the sale of the JADU separate from the sale of the single-family residence, including a statement that the deed restriction may be enforced against future purchasers.
b. A restriction on the size and attributes of the JADU that conforms with this chapter.
c. If a JADU is rented, the unit shall not be rented for a period of less than thirty consecutive calendar days.

4. A JADU shall be constructed within the walls of the proposed or existing single-family residence, including attached garages.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
43 5. JADUs shall include a separate entrance from the primary dwelling entrance of the proposed or existing single-family residence.

If a permitted JADU does not include a separate bathroom, the permitted JADU shall include both a separate entrance from the primary dwelling entrance and an interior entry to the main living area to provide access to the shared sanitation facilities.

6. The JADU shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following:
a. A cooking facility with appliances.
b. A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit.

C. Attached ADUs. One attached ADU per single-family lot is permitted, subject to the following requirements:

1. Size. The total floor area of an attached ADU shall be not more than one thousand two hundred square feet or fifty percent of the existing or proposed primary dwelling, whichever is less.
a. In any case where 50% of the primary house SF is less than 850 SF, a maximum of 850 SF new constructed (attached or detached) shall be permitted.

2. Location. Unless a State Exempt ADU, attached ADUs shall not be located in the front yard unless development of an eight hundred-fifty-square-foot ADU is otherwise infeasible.

3. Setbacks. The side and rear setbacks shall be no less than four feet.

4. Height.
a. An attached ADU shall not exceed twenty-five feet in height, or the height requirement for the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. b. ADUs shall not exceed two stories in height.

5. Colors. An attached ADU or JADU shall use the same exterior wall and roof colors as the primary dwelling unit.

6. Roof Pitch and Eaves. An attached ADU or JADU shall have the same roof pitch as the primary dwelling with same eave details but may vary by up to two vertical inches more or less in every twelve horizontal inches.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
44 D. Detached ADUs. One newly constructed detached ADU per single-family lot is permitted, subject to the following requirements:

1. Size. The total floor area of a detached ADU shall not exceed one thousand two hundred square feet.

2. Location. Unless State Exempt ADU, detached ADUs shall not be located in the front yard unless development of an eight hundred-fifty-square-foot ADU is otherwise infeasible.
a. Exception – State Exempt ADUs are not restricted in the location provided the ADU meets the 4 foot setback.

3. Setbacks.
a. The side and rear setbacks shall be no less than four feet. b. The separation between the detached ADU and the primary dwelling shall be as per California Residential Code.

4. Height. A detached ADU shall not exceed sixteen feet in height, except in the following cases:
a. A height of eighteen feet, plus up to two (2) additional feet solely to accommodate a roof pitch aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit is permitted when an ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in this code section.

5. Colors. Detached ADUs shall utilize the same exterior wall and roof colors as the primary dwelling unit.

E. Conversion ADUs. One conversion ADU per single-family lot is permitted, subject to the following requirements:

1. Setbacks. No setbacks shall be required for ADU conversions located within the existing living area or an existing accessory structure, or an ADU that replaces an existing structure and is located in the same location and to the same dimensions as the structure being replaced. A legal accessory building (including a detached garage) may be converted into an ADU, provided the side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety.

2. Height. A conversion ADU shall not alter the height of the existing structure (single-family dwelling, accessory building, or garage) that is being converted.

3. Other Standards.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
45 a. Conversion ADUs in existing accessory structures may expand the existing dimensions of the structure no more than one hundred fifty square feet to accommodate ingress/egress. Any such expansion shall count towards the size of the ADU.

4. Colors. Conversion ADUs shall utilize same roof and exterior wall colors as the primary dwelling unit.

F. Additional Requirements. These requirements shall apply to all ADUs and JADUs on single-family lots except for those ADUs and JADUs that are state exempt:

1. Except as specified in this section, ADUs shall comply with lot coverage, open space, front setbacks, minimum lot size, and other zoning standards applicable to the primary dwelling, except in no event shall the application of any of these standards preclude at least an eight-hundred-square-foot ADU of interior livable space.

2. Windows. Second floor windows facing another residential property, less than ten feet from the property line, and larger than two square feet shall include at least one of the following:
a. Have obscured glazing; or
b. Be offset from neighbor’s windows to maximize privacy; or c. Include splayed windows to avoid direct views, as shown in Figure 1 (applies only to new construction).

Figure 1: ADU/JADU Window Locations for Privacy

3. Second Floor Balconies or Decks. Second floor balconies, decks, or rooftop terraces facing another residential property are prohibited (applies only to new construction).

4. Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting shall be mounted no higher than seven feet from grade and directed downwards. (Ord. 692 § 3 (Exh. A), 2025)

17.78.080 Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
46 A. Parking requirements for newly constructed ADUs shall not exceed one parking space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less. This space may be provided as tandem parking, including on an existing driveway or in setback areas, excluding the nondriveway front yard setback. Exception to the requirement for provision of one parking space may be made per subsection B of this section.

B. Parking is not required in the following instances:

1. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit.

2. When there is an approved car share vehicle for which a Foster City business license has been issued and remains active, located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.

3. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot; provided, that the ADU or the parcel satisfies any other any other criteria listed in Government Code Section 66322, subdivisions (a)(1)—(a)(5), as may be amended from time to time.

4. As a condition of construction of a JADU.

5. Where the ADU only includes a studio with no bedroom.

6. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant area.

7. Where the ADU is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure.

8. When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of, or is converted to, an ADU, then those off-street parking spaces are not required to be replaced. (Ord. 692 § 3 (Exh. A), 2025)

9. When the proposed ADU is a State Exempt ADU.

17.78.090 Permit process.

A. Unless otherwise specified in subsection D of this section, pursuant to California Government Code Section 66317 mandating ministerial approval of JADUs and ADUs if all of the applicable standards are met, the chief building official or the official’s designee shall approve the JADU and ADU permit within sixty calendar days of the complete application being submitted. The City shall determine the completeness of all ADU or JADU application within fifteen business days after receipt of application.

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
47 1. If a ADU and/or JADU is proposed as part of a new or remodeled primary residence, the sixty-calendar day timeline shall not commence until the primary residence is permitted.

2. The city may review and approve the ADU or JADU in conjunction with the new or remodeled primary residence, but the application to create the ADU or JADU shall be considered without discretionary review or hearing.

The chief building official or the official’s designee shall approve the ADU permit within thirty calendar days from the date the local agency receives a complete application if the application either:

1. Utilizes a plan for an accessory dwelling unit that has been preapproved by the local agency within the current triennial California Building Standards Code rulemaking cycle, or

2. Utilizes a plan that is identical to a plan used in an application for a detached accessory dwelling unit approved by the local agency within the current triennial California Building Standards Code rulemaking cycle.

B. If the city disapproves an application for an ADU or JADU, the building division shall return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant.

C. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU must be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time.

D. In conformance with Government Code Section 66314, the city shall, by resolution, adopt a program for the preapproval of designs for ADUs, which may be amended from time to time. Any application for an ADU utilizing a design plan for ADUs that has been preapproved pursuant to that program shall be approved or denied within thirty days.

1. The city shall also review accessory dwelling unit plan submissions for preapproval upon an application for such a request and payment of the applicable fee. The city shall approve or deny the preapproval applications, as specified. (Ord. 692 § 3 (Exh. A), 2025)

17.78.100 Other provisions.

A. Prior to obtaining a building permit for a JADU, a deed restriction, approved by the city attorney, shall be recorded with the county recorder’s office, which shall include the pertinent restrictions and limitations of a JADU identified in this section including but not limited to: prohibition of the sale of the JADU separate from the sale of the single-family residence; restrictions on the size and attributes of the JADU; and prohibitions on

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
48 rentals less than thirty consecutive days. Said deed restriction shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon any future owners, heirs, or assigns.

B. Owner Occupancy. Except for the JADU owner-occupancy requirements set forth in this chapter, no owner-occupancy requirement shall be enforced, and no deed restriction shall be required for ADU permit applications.

C. Permitting of Existing Unpermitted ADUs or JADUs. For any unpermitted or substandard ADU or JADU built before January 1, 2020, upon an owner’s request, the city’s chief building official shall not deny the permit unless they make a finding that correcting the violation is necessary to comply with the standards specified in California Health and Safety Code Section 17920.3 or the building is deemed substandard pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 17920.3, pursuant to California Government Code Section 66332.

D. Any ADU may be leased for a period not fewer than thirty consecutive days.

E. Fire flow and fire department access must comply with the California Fire Code as amended by the San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department, or an alternate means shall be proposed.

F. Fire Sprinklers.

1. An ADU shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence and may employ alternative methods for fire protection.

2. The construction of an ADU shall not trigger a requirement of fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling.

G. ADUs that are seven hundred fifty square feet of interior livable space or smaller are exempt from impact fees.

H. Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, the requirements for newly constructed ADUs shall not preclude constructing one ADU of at least eight hundred fifty square feet of interior livable space which is not more than sixteen feet in height, and at least four feet set back from the side and rear property lines.

I. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, an applicant shall not be required to correct nonconforming conditions on the subject property as a condition of obtaining permits to construct an ADU or JADU.

J. Any properties with ADUs built or developed by a nonprofit corporation may qualify to be sold or conveyed separately from the primary residence, pursuant to California Government Code Section 66341. A qualified nonprofit corporation is a nonprofit corporation which is organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
49 Code that has received a welfare exemption under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 214.15 for properties intended to be sold to low-income families who participate in a special no-interest loan program.

K. All JADUs and ADUs shall comply with the current Title 24 California Code of Regulations, as adopted by the city, and all related safety codes, except as otherwise permitted pursuant to California Government Code Section 66332. (Ord. 684 § 2 (Exh.

I), 2024; Ord. 677 § 3 (Exh. F), 2024; Ord. 669 § 2 (Exh. A), 2023) L. Per Gov. Code, §§ 66321, subds. (b)(2) and (b)(3); 66313, subd. (d) size limitations shall be based on the square footage of interior living space of an ADU or JADU.

M. All ADUs shall provide exterior access that is separate from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling.

17.78.110 Appeal.

A. In case the permit application is determine to be incomplete or is denied, the applicant not satisfied with an ADU permit decision of the Building Official, may, within 10 calendar days after the decision of the Building Official, appeal in writing to the Planning Commission, accompanied by a fee as set by resolution of the city council.

B. The appeal letter or completed appeal form shall specify:

1. The person making the appeal;

2. The specific item of appeal, and all supporting documentation, written in clear and concise language;

3. The basis for such appeal; and

4. The relief or action sought.

The appeal letter shall contain information substantiating the basis for appeal.

C. The Planning Commission shall review the written findings of staff, and shall consider the written and oral argument of the appellant, and render a decision within 60 business days of the appeal. Information not presented to the Planning Commission for consideration prior to rendering a decision may not be introduced at the meeting of the Planning Commission on the appeal.

D. If the appeal is approved, the application for the appeal and ADU shall be approved and issued within the original shot clock pertaining to the type of ADU application (30 calendar day or 60 calendar day review).

5.3 Attachment 1a - Exhibit A
50 DATE: July 20, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Benjamin L. Stock, City Attorney
DEPARTMENT: City Manager, City Attorney
SUBJECT: TERMINATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO

CYBERSECURITY EVENT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution terminating the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to the Cybersecurity Event.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 19, 2026, the City’s network was cyber attacked by an external actor, and this cybersecurity event caused network access to become unavailable, which significantly interfered with City staff’s ability to conduct business and provide services.

As a result of the conditions of disaster, the City Manager, in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed a state of local emergency on March 19, 2026, which was ratified by the City Council on March 23, 2026.

The conditions which caused the emergency have now been resolved and staff is recommending that the Local Emergency be terminated.

BACKGROUND
Government Code section 8630 and section 2.40.070 (A) of the Municipal Code empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, as that term is defined in Section 2.40.020 and the City Council is not in session.

5.4 Staff Report
51 On March 19, 2026, the City’s network was cyber attacked by an external actor and this cybersecurity event caused network access to become unavailable which significantly interferes with City staff’s ability to conduct business and provide services. As a result of the cybersecurity event, the City Manager, in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services did determine that a “local emergency”1 existed and issued a Proclamation of Local Emergency on March 19, 2026 (Attachment 2).

The City Council ratified the Proclamation of Local Emergency at its regular meeting on March 23, 2026 via City Resolution No. 2026-025, pursuant to Government Code section 8630(b). The City Clerk’s Office provided written notification of the Proclamation to the appropriate departments within San Mateo County and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services pursuant to Government Code 8607.

ANALYSIS
Due to the diligent efforts of staff, and through partnerships with cybersecurity experts provided by the City’s cybersecurity insurance provider, the City was able to recover control of its network systems. This included restoring systems throughout the City with additional cybersecurity measures implemented.

The Director of Emergency Services has determined that the conditions that created the local emergency have been resolved and as such recommends that the Proclamation of Local Emergency be terminated.

California Environmental Quality Act
The termination of the Proclamation of Local Emergency is not a project within the meaning of Section 15378 of CEQA Guidelines because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, either directly or ultimately.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with terminating the Local Emergency.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Proclamation of Local Emergency
1 As that term is defined in Section 2.40.020 of the Foster City Municipal Code (“FCMC”).

5.4 Staff Report
52 RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY

TERMINATING THE PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO

CYBERSECURITY EVENT

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 and section 2.40.070 (A) of the Municipal Code empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence of a local emergency when the City of Foster City (“City”) is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, as that term is defined in Section 2.40.020 and the City Council is not in session; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Director of Emergency Services is identified in the Municipal Code as the City Manager; and
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2026, the City’s network was cyber attacked by an external actor, and this cybersecurity event caused network access to become unavailable which significantly interferes with City staff’s ability to conduct business and provide services; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager, acting as Director of Emergency Services, did find that conditions of disaster to persons and property within this City were met; and WHEREAS, in response to these developments, the City Manager in his capacity as the City’s Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency on March 19, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, these conditions and the needed response were determined to be likely beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair pursuant to Foster City Municipal Code Chapters 2.40, 3.04 and without giving notice for bids to let the contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code 22050; and
WHEREAS, as contemplated in the Emergency Service Act contained in Government Code Section 8550 et seq., including Section 8558(c), the City Manager determined that a local emergency existed because of the existence of conditions of disaster to the safety of persons and property within the City caused by the aforesaid conditions which are beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk provided written notification of the Proclamation of Local Emergency and other necessary documents to the appropriate departments within San

5.4 Attachment 1 - Resolution
53 Mateo County and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services pursuant to Government Code 8607; and
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2026, the City Council ratified the Proclamation of Local Emergency via City Resolution No. 2026-025; and
WHEREAS, the conditions that caused the emergency have been resolved.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City, in accordance with Government Code section 8630, hereby terminates the Proclamation of Local Emergency ratified by the City Council on March 23, 2026 as the conditions that caused the local emergency to be declared have been resolved and no longer exist.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 20th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.4 Attachment 1 - Resolution
54 PROCLAMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY BY THE CITY

MANAGER OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY RELATED TO RANSOMWARE ATTACK
WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 and section 2.40.070 (A) of the Municipal Code empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence of a local emergency when the City of Foster City (“City”) is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, as that term is defined in Section 2.40.020 and the City Council is not in session; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Emergency Services is identified in the Municipal Code as the City Manager; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the City’s network was attacked by an external actor in the form of a ransomeware attack; and
WHEREAS, this attack caused network access to unavailable, which significantly interferes with City staff’s ability to conduct business and provide services and the network is expected to be down for a few days; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager, acting as Director of Emergency Services, did find that conditions of disaster to persons and property within this City were met due to the significant disruption to City services, including emergency services; and WHEREAS, in response to these developments, the City Manager in his capacity as the City’s Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency on March 19, 2026 at approximately 9:00 A.M.; and WHEREAS, these conditions and the needed response are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair pursuant to Foster City Municipal Code Chapters 2.40, 3.04 and without giving notice for bids to let the contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code 22050; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is not in session and cannot immediately be called into session; and
WHEREAS, this Proclamation shall be subject to confirmation by the City Council within seven days of execution; and
WHEREAS, the City will provide written notification of this Proclamation and other necessary documents to the appropriate departments within San Mateo County and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services pursuant to Government Code 8607.

5.4 Attachment 2 - Proclamation of Local Emergency
55 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED that a local emergency now exists throughout said City.

IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of said local emergency the powers functions and duties of the emergency organization of this City shall be those prescribed by state law, by ordinances, and resolutions of this City, and that this emergency proclamation shall expire on March 26, 2026, unless ratified and extended by the City Council of the City of Foster City.

Dated: March 19, 2026 _______________
Stefan Chatwin, City Manager

5.4 Attachment 2 - Proclamation of Local Emergency
56 DATE: July 20, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
Tiffany Oren, Recreation Manager
Frank Fanara, Parks Maintenance Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT AND STREET CLOSURES FOR FOSTER CITY SUMMER DAYS - AUGUST 14-16, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a temporary use permit on August 14-16, 2026, for the annual Foster City Birthday Celebration, Summer Days, at Leo J. Ryan Park and authorize the closure of portions of:
• Shell Boulevard
• Balclutha Drive between the roundabout and Shell Boulevard • The exit onto Shell Boulevard from the south service road of the Peninsula Jewish Community Center (PJCC) Campus; and
• Civic Center Drive.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Foster City Parks and Recreation Department will use Shell Boulevard, Leo J. Ryan Park, The VIBE Teen Center, and parking lot for Foster City Summer Days from 9:00 AM on Tuesday, August 11, 2026, until 5:00 AM on Tuesday, August 18, 2026.

Associated street closures for the event will occur between Tuesday, August 11, 2026, and Tuesday, August 18, 2026, as follows:

5.5 Staff Report
57 • Shell Boulevard to be closed to through traffic between East Hillsdale Boulevard and South Service Road
• Balclutha Drive to be closed to through traffic between the roundabout and Shell Boulevard
• Shell Boulevard exit off the far South Service Road on the PJCC campus to be closed
• The exit off Civic Center Drive onto Shell Boulevard, just west of the roundabout on the PJCC campus to be closed.

In addition, the Leo J. Ryan Park meadow will be unavailable from Monday, August 10 at 8:00 AM for placement and breakdown of some of the carnival rides through Tuesday, August 18, at 12:00 PM.

Signage will be placed on A-frames to draw attention to the parking lot and street closures. Information about the parking lot and street closures will also be shared through the City's electronic marquee, monthly e-newsletter, City Calendar, the event website, and the Foster City Islander. Information on the event and street and parking lot closures will be posted and distributed through the Community Center and The VIBE Teen Center, and in classes and activities that generally take place at these locations. The City has also shared this plan with the PJCC and Wornick Jewish Day School as it can impact their patrons.

BACKGROUND
On May 14, 2018, the City Council directed staff to create a new, revenue-generating large special event managed by City staff. City Council direction was to develop an event that would have a local/community focus with a Citywide celebratory appeal and would be self-sustaining or revenue positive. On February 22, 2022, the City Council authorized the addition of Summer Days as an on-going annual community event.

Summer Days is a multi-day event, that will incorporate the elements of a traditional community carnival with a modern twist. This event has traditionally featured food trucks, handmade craft vendors, local community organizations and businesses, beer and wine, entertainment, carnival rides, and the Rubber Ducky Races.

5.5 Staff Report
58 2026 Summer Days Activity Schedule:

Carnival (Meadow & Shell Boulevard)
Friday, August 14 - 5:00 PM-10:30 PM
Saturday, August 15 - 11:00 AM-11:00 PM
Sunday, August 16 - 11:00 AM-7:00 PM
Craft Vendors (Shell Boulevard)
Saturday, August 15 - 11:00 AM-6:00 PM
Sunday, August 16 - 11:00 AM-5:00 PM
Food and Beverage (Shell Boulevard & Parking Lot)
Saturday, August 15 - 11:00 AM-8:00 PM
Sunday, August 16 - 11:00 AM-5:00 PM
Entertainment (Amphitheater & Shell Boulevard)
Friday, August 14 – 5:00 PM-8:00 PM
Saturday, August 15 - 1:00 PM-5:00 PM
Sunday, August 16 - 1:00 PM-5:00 PM

ANALYSIS
The street festival concept encompasses a significant portion of Leo J. Ryan Park, as well as the Community Center. The proposed layout for 2026 includes and anticipates the following:
• Shell Boulevard (between East Hillsdale Boulevard and Foster Square Lane) closed to through traffic from 9:00 AM on Tuesday, August 11 until 5:00 AM on Tuesday, August 18. Due to the loss of access to the Community Center and its full parking lot, the street will be closed for an additional two days compared to previous years to allow for the increased setup time.
• Shell Boulevard (between Foster Square Lane and Bounty Drive) closed to through traffic from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17.
• Balclutha Drive (between the roundabout on the PJCC campus and Shell Boulevard) closed to through traffic from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17.
• Shell Boulevard exit from South Service Road of the PJCC campus will be closed from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August

17. • Shell Boulevard exit from Civic Center Drive will be closed from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17.

5.5 Staff Report
59 • Leo Ryan Park meadow will be temporarily closed to the public from 8:00 AM on Monday, August 10, through 12:00 PM on Tuesday, August 18, to allow for the setup of carnival attractions. This location is a new addition to this year’s event preparations.
• Security guards at barricades around the clock during the weekend, thus reducing the hours of reserve police officers.
• A wide walkway for attendees to move through the venue, therefore increasing public safety.
• Emergency access routes within the layout of the event • Use of The VIBE Teen Center and surrounding park
• Parkside Towers parking structure and Century Plaza parking lots will be used to provide public parking and monitored by local service club organizations. • Vendor parking will be at City Hall lot which will be monitored by Security. • Accessible parking will be located at the Community Center/Foster City Library lot.

The street festival concept allows participants to move from one side of Shell Boulevard to the other, while enjoying a wide variety of vendors and avoiding congestion.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Not Applicable

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Public Safety/Social Equity

FISCAL IMPACT
Preparing for the street closure requires staff time from the Parks Division, however, the tasks are completed and included as part of the maintenance team’s regular daily responsibilities leading up to the event.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Summer Days Event Map

5.5 Staff Report
60 RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY

AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF SHELL BOULEVARD BETWEEN

EAST HILLSDALE BOULEVARD AND SOUTH SERVICE ROAD, BALCLUTHA DRIVE

BETWEEN THE ROUND-ABOUT ON THE PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY

CENTER (PJCC) CAMPUS AND SHELL BOULEVARD, AND THE TEMPORARY

CLOSURE OF THE SHELL BOULEVARD EXIT OF THE SOUTH SERVICE ROAD FOR SUMMER DAYS 2026

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Foster City has requested a temporary street closure to allow the use of Leo J. Ryan Memorial Park on August 14-16, 2026, for Summer Days community event; and
WHEREAS, Section 21101(e) of Division 11 of the California Vehicle Code allows local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, to adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution allowing the temporary closing of any street for the purposes of any celebration, parade, or local special events where the closing is necessary for the protection of persons who are using that portion of the street; and WHEREAS, the street closures include: Shell Boulevard between East Hillsdale Boulevard. and South Service Road; Balclutha Drive between the round-about on the PJCC Campus and Shell Boulevard; the Shell Boulevard exit from the South Service Road of the PJCC Campus; and the Shell Boulevard exit from Civic Center Drive; and WHEREAS, members of the Foster City Police Department have reviewed the proposal for the event and recommend the closing for safety reasons; and WHEREAS, Section 2265(n) of Division 11 of the California Vehicle Code allows that whenever any vehicle is parked or left standing where local authorities by resolution or ordinance, have prohibited parking and have authorized the removal of vehicles, a peace officer engaged in the enforcement of parking laws may remove vehicles; no vehicle may be removed unless signs are posted giving notice of the removal.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby authorize the closure of Shell Boulevard between East Hillsdale Boulevard and Foster Square Lane from 9:00 AM on Tuesday, August 11 until 5:00 AM on Tuesday, August 18; Shell Boulevard between Foster Square Lane and Bounty Drive, Balclutha Drive between the round-about on the PJCC Campus and Shell Boulevard, and of the Shell Boulevard exit of the South Service Road of the PJCC Campus from 9:00am on Thursday, August 13, until 5:00am on Monday, August 17, 2026, for the purpose of Summer Days.

5.5 Attachment 1 - Resolution
61 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the posting of temporary no parking/tow away signs as approved by the Chief of Police; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief of Police or his duly appointed officer, as defined by the California Vehicle Code, may remove illegally parked vehicles as provided by this resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, as a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 20th day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.5 Attachment 1 - Resolution
62 Foster City Summer Days 2026 Event Layout
Under Construction
Car Show will be held on Shell Blvd. on Friday, August 14, only.

5.5 Attachment 2- Summer Days Event Map
63 Summer Days Street Closure Closeup
Street Closures:

Shell Boulevard (between East Hillsdale Boulevard and Foster Square Lane) closed to through traffic from 9:00 AM on Tuesday, August 11 until 5:00 AM on Tuesday, August 18 for setup and breakdown of the carnival rides that need to be moved to the street.

Shell Boulevard (between Foster Square Lane and Bounty Drive) closed to through traffic from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17 Balclutha Drive (between the round-about on the PJCC campus and Shell Boulevard) closed to through traffic from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17
Shell Boulevard exit from South Service Road of the PJCC campus will be closed from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17 Shell Boulevard exit from Civic Center Drive will be closed from 9:00 AM on Thursday, August 13 until 5:00 AM on Monday, August 17
The Meadow will be closed at 8:00 AM on Monday, August 10 through 12:00 PM on Tuesday, August 18 for setup, public usage, and breakdown of the carnival rides.

Phase 1XXX
XXX
Closed from 9am Tuesday 8/11 through
Tuesday 8/18
Phase 2 XXX

XXX XXX
Closed from 9am Thursday 8/13
through Monday 8/17

5.5 Attachment 2- Summer Days Event Map
64 DATE: July 20, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director
Laura Galli, Engineering Manager
Francine Magno, Senior Civil Engineer
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE COUNTY WIDE LOCAL

ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Foster City adopt the attached resolution accepting the Addendum to the Countywide Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
An LRSP is a comprehensive document to help guide the City with respect to targeted safety improvements and policies for its roadway system. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) initiated and developed a Countywide LRSP, which included individual plans for jurisdictions within the County, in order to assist agencies in becoming eligible for future U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Caltrans, and other safety funding opportunities.

In order to qualify for implementation grants under the US Department of Transportation (USDOT) Safe Streets for All (SS4A) grant program, jurisdictions must already have in place, a Safety Action Plan. As several jurisdictions began pursuing grant funding, it was discovered that the LRSPs were insufficient to serve as an Action Plan per the USDOT SS4A grant program requirements. Subsequently, C/CAG developed an Addendum to the Countywide LRSP to address the identified insufficiencies. The Addendum is

5.6 Staff Report
65 complete and USDOT has confirmed the Countywide LRSP and Addendum qualify as an eligible Action Plan. City Council’s adoption of the attached resolution accepting the Addendum to the Countywide LRSP, will render the City eligible for future USDOT SS4A grant programs.

BACKGROUND
In March 2023, the C/CAG Board of Directors hired Kittelson & Associates (Kittelson) to develop a San Mateo Countywide LRSP, which included a standalone chapter for Foster City. An LRSP identifies and analyzes roadway safety needs and develops a prioritized list of safety improvements. It establishes goals to reduce and eventually eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries using a data-driven, multi-disciplinary approach that increases safe mobility for all.

On June 13, 2024, the C/CAG Board of Directors approved Resolution 24-47 adopting the Final San Mateo Countywide LRSP and accompanying Vision Zero Goal.

At the June 16, 2025 meeting, the City Council adopted City Resolution No. 2025-51 which adopted the Countywide and Foster City (specific chapter) LRSP and its accompanying Vision Zero Goal.

ANALYSIS
Following the adoption of the Countywide LRSP, several jurisdictions within San Mateo County began pursuing grant funding to implement identified safety countermeasures. In attempting to pursue the USDOT SS4A grant program, these jurisdictions were ineligible to apply because the LRSP did not qualify as an Action Plan, per the grant application instructions. The USDOT indicated that two components of the LRSP needed further development to meet eligibility requirements for an Action Plan: (1) Strategy and Project Selection, specifically including timelines for prioritized safety projects, and (2) Progress and Transparency, outlining how implementation and reporting would be conducted.

Subsequently, C/CAG hired Kittelson & Associates (previous developer of the LRSP) to develop an addendum to the Countywide LRSP. The addendum was completed in April 2026 and expands on the required components by incorporating near and long-term timelines, and a clear reporting framework. C/CAG resubmitted the revised document to USDOT on April 21, 2026. Following review, USDOT confirmed that the C/CAG LRSP Addendum includes all required elements to qualify as an eligible Action Plan for the SS4A Implementation Grant.

The adoption of the Addendum to the Countywide LRSP will render the City eligible for future grant funding from the US Department of Transportation Safe Streets for All (SS4A), particularly the Implementation Program. The Implementation Program includes funding for, but not limited to, pedestrian safety enhancements, speed management, and intersection improvements. Staff anticipates pursuing the Implementation Program in the

5.6 Staff Report
66 future to implement projects identified in the LRSP and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, which is planned for adoption later this year.

CEQA
This action does not require a CEQA exemption.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this Council action. The development of the Addendum to the Countywide LRSP was completed by C/CAG and was funded through the C/CAG Congestion Relief Funds.

The adoption of the Addendum to the Countywide LRSP will render the City eligible for future grant funding opportunities.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Infrastructure and Facilities
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan

5.6 Staff Report
67 RESOLUTION NO. ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY ADOPTING

THE ADDENDUM TO THE COUNTYWIDE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) identifies and analyzes roadway safety needs and develops a prioritized list of safety countermeasures to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries; and
WHEREAS, the LRSP supports the goals of the California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and promotes a systematic, data-driven approach to improving roadway safety; and
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2024, the C/CAG Board adopted Resolution No. 24-47 approving the San Mateo Countywide LRSP and accompanying Vision Zero goal; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-51 adopting the San Mateo Countywide and Foster City LRSP and accompanying Vision Zero goal; and
WHEREAS, following adoption of the Countywide LRSP, jurisdictions began pursuing funding opportunities to implement identified safety improvements; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) provided feedback indicating that additional detail was required for the LRSP to qualify as an eligible Action Plan for the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Implementation Grant Program, specifically in the areas of Strategy and Project Selection and Progress and Transparency; and WHEREAS, an addendum to the Countywide LRSP was initiated in November 2025, with Kittelson & Associates retained to support the update effort; and WHEREAS, in coordination with C/CAG, a mini Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC), composed of members from the original LRSP advisory group, was convened to provide guidance and input throughout development of the addendum; and WHEREAS, the LRSP Addendum was completed in April 2026 and expands upon the original plan by incorporating project timelines for prioritized safety improvements and establishing a framework for implementation reporting and transparency; and WHEREAS, the updated LRSP Addendum was submitted to USDOT on April 21, 2026, and subsequently determined to include all required elements to qualify as an eligible Action Plan for the FY26 SS4A Implementation Grant and future SS4A funding opportunities.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Foster City adopts the Addendum to the San Mateo Countywide Local Roadway Safety Plan.

5.6 Attachment 1 - Resolution
68 PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 20th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.6 Attachment 1 - Resolution
69 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
April 10, 2026 Project# 32309
To: Jeff Lacap, Eva Gaye
C/CAG
From: Mike Alston, Grace Carsky, and Ravi Cohen
RE: C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum
Introduction and Summary
This memo serves as an addendum to the 2024 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) Countywide Local Road Safety Plan (Countywide LRSP). This memo provides additional context and information for the following aspects of the Countywide LRSP:
◼ Strategy and Project Selection: This section identifies how the plan arrived at a comprehensive set of projects and strategies to address the safety problems in the Countywide LRSP. It provides the reader with additional information about time ranges when projects and strategies will be deployed and an explanation of project prioritization criteria.
◼ Progress and Transparency: This section describes how C/CAG will measure progress over time using outcome data.

Both sections of this memo primarily point the reader back to information published in the Countywide LRSP and its constituent jurisdiction-specific chapters. The Countywide LRSP is available online at https://ccag.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/28717_CCAG-Countywide-LRSP-Countywide-Local-wappendices_Jun7_2.pdf. The constituent jurisdiction-specific chapters may be accessed individually online at https://ccag.ca.gov/plansreportslibrary-2/transportation/countywide-local-roadway-safety-plan/.

Strategy and Project Selection
This section serves as an addendum to the “Strategy and Project Selections” section of the Countywide LRSP. The “Strategy and Project Selections” section, located on pages 63 to 80 of the Countywide LRSP, details the locations throughout the County to be prioritized for improvement that were identified based on:
(1) Analysis of historical crash trends;
(2) Analysis of crash locations, severity, contributing factors, and types; (3) Systemic analysis of safety needs (i.e., identified risk factors); and (4) Spatial identification of high-risk locations based on the above-listed characteristics. 155 Grand Avenue, Suite 505
Oakland, CA 94612
P 510.839.1742

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 70 April 10, 2026 Page 2
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

This addendum provides summaries of the High Injury Network (HIN) and project prioritization methodologies and categorizes those projects by their expected timing (in progress, near-term, or longterm).

Part 1: High Injury Network Methodology Summary
Three HINs were created in development of the Countywide LRSP: A Pedestrian HIN, a Bicycle HIN, and a Motor Vehicle HIN. Crashes were assigned to a mode based on the most vulnerable party involved:
crashes involving a pedestrian were coded as pedestrian crashes, those involving a bicyclist, but no pedestrian were coded as bicyclist crashes, and those without a pedestrian or bicyclist involved were coded as motor vehicle crashes.

The team conducted a network screening which identified a severity-weighted crash frequency for every intersection and roadway in the County between 2018-2022. A severity weight was assigned to each crash based on the most severely injured party involved in that crash; the weights are given in Table 1. More information on the scoring method and rationale is provided on pages 23-24 of Appendix D of the Countywide LRSP.

Table 1: Weighting Crashes by Severity
Crash Severity
Weight for
Pedestrian or
Bicyclist Crash
Weight for Motor Vehicle Crash
All Locations Unsignalized
Intersection
Signalized
intersection Roadway
Property Damage
Only
Not included in
analysis 1 1 1
Possible Injury Not included in
analysis 6 6 6
Minor Injury 1 11 11 11
Severe Injury 3 191 120 165
Fatality 3 191 120 165
Source: C/CAG 2024
The network screening assigned each analysis segment or intersection a severity-weighted frequency value, or a “crash score,” by summing the cumulative score of all crashes occurring on it (or at the intersection). All road segments whose crash score exceeded a given threshold were included in the HIN.

The thresholds were selected such that the pedestrian and bicycle HINs represented 3.3% of the roadway network, while the roadway HIN represented 10% of the network.

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 71 April 10, 2026 Page 3
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

A more detailed description of the HIN Methodology is provided on pages 27-38 of Appendix D of the Countywide LRSP.

Part 2: Project Prioritization Methodology Summary
Project prioritization was conducted separately for each of the three HIN modes (pedestrians, bicycles, and motor vehicles). Each intersection was scored using three equally weighted factors:
◼ 5-year (2018 to 2022) crash frequency and crash severity at the intersection. ◼ A variable indicating whether the intersection is located within one or more local, regional, or federal priority areas.
◼ A variable indicating overlapping crash risk at a location, calculated by adding one point per location for each of these characteristics: located near a transit stop, located near a school, an unsignalized intersection, located on an arterial/collector road or a road with a 35 mph or higher speed limit.

A detailed discussion of the scores can be found in Figures 1-3 of Appendix D of the Countywide LRSP.

The factors were calculated using the following data for each mode.

The pedestrian, bicycle, and motor vehicle totals were each normalized (creating values of 0 to 1 for each) and added together, so an intersection could have a maximum score of 3. For each road segment, the scores of each intersection within it were added together to find a segment-level score. The segments with the highest scores were selected as prioritized locations. The Countywide LRSP deferred to the local agencies on prioritized projects if they prepared their own plan.

The project prioritization methodology is presented in-depth in Appendix D of the Countywide LRSP.

Part 3: Future Prioritization
The project lists developed for the Countywide LRSP represent a list of prioritized project locations and countermeasures to address identified systemic or location-specific crash patterns. They are not presented in rank-order priority, and the path to implementation varies for any project depending on a number of factors. For example, some projects may be able to be implemented in part or in whole with new development and associated infrastructure changes. Other projects may be candidates for grant funding like HSIP (based on crash history) or ATP (based on demographic and other project development history).

Each city will monitor its list while considering grant opportunities and while preparing its budget and CIP list, with an eye on how to implement these projects.

Part 4: Project Timing
For each project location identified, C/CAG worked with local agency staff to estimate a time horizon for project implementation. For the 10 agencies who created a plan alongside C/CAG, the estimated timeframes are shown in the tables below.

Each project is sorted into one of the three categories below:

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 72 April 10, 2026 Page 4
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
- In Progress / Construction Ready: Projects that are funded and for which the PS&E phase of design has already started or has finished. Construction is estimated to be completed before 2031.
- Near-Term / Concept Phase: Projects for which concept-level plans exist or have been funded.

Construction is estimated to begin by 2031 with completion dates estimated between 2032 and 2036.
- Long-Term / Planning Phase: All other projects. Construction is estimated to begin after 2031.

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 73 April 10, 2026 Page 5
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ATHERTON
The Town of Atherton’s prioritized projects can be found on page 16 to 18 of the “Town of Atherton Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Town of Atherton Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
El Camino Real, Berkshire Ave to
Spruce Ave (E to W town
limits)****
Corridor Yes X
1 El Camino Real and
Columbia Ave*,**
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
2 Loyola Ave and El Camino
Real*,**
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
3 El Camino Real and 5th
Ave*,**
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
4 Amherst Ave and El Camino
Real*,**
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
5 El Camino Real and
Berkshire Ave*,**
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 74 April 10, 2026 Page 6
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
6 El Camino Real and
Stockbridge Ave
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
7 Selby Ln and El Camino
Real*,**
Intersection Yes X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
8 Wilburn Ave and El Camino
Real
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
9 El Camino Real and
Almendral Ave
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
10 El Camino Real and Spruce
Ave***
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
11 El Camino Real and Isabella
Ave
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
12 El Camino Real and Ashfield
Rd
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
13 Maple Ave and El Camino
Real
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 75 April 10, 2026 Page 7
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
14 El Camino Real and Walnut
Ave
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
15 El Camino Real and
Tuscaloosa Ave
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
16 El Camino Real and
Redwood Way
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
17 El Camino Real and Lloyden
Dr
Intersection Yes Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
Alameda de las Pulgas,
Stockbridge Ave to Cam Al Lago
(E to W town limits)****
Corridor No X
18 Alameda de las Pulgas and
Stockbridge Ave*
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
19 Alameda de las Pulgas and
Walsh Rd
Intersection No Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
20 Callado Way and Alameda
de las Pulgas
Intersection No Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 76 April 10, 2026 Page 8
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
21 Fletcher Dr And Alameda
De Las Pulgas
Intersection No Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
22 Alameda De Las Pulgas and
Atherton Ave
Intersection No Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
23 Alameda De Las Pulgas and
Polhemus Ave
Intersection No Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
24 Alameda De Las Pulgas and
Karen Way
Intersection No Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start
by 2031, but dates are not
scheduled)
Valparaiso Ave, Camino por los
Arboles to Victoria Dr*
Corridor No X
25 Robert S Dr and Valparaiso
Ave***
Intersection No X Complete (a safety project has
been implemented)
26 Valparaiso Ave and Lee Dr Intersection No X Complete (a safety project has been implemented)
27 Park Ln and Valparaiso
Ave***
Intersection No X Complete (a safety project has
been implemented)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 77 April 10, 2026 Page 9
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
28 Elder Ave and Atherton
Oaks Ln
Intersection No X Complete (a safety project has
been implemented)
Middlefield Rd, Encina Ave to
Ringwood Ave
Corridor No X
29 Middlefield Rd and
Ravenswood Ave***
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
30 Middlefield Rd and
Ringwood Ave***
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
31 Middlefield Rd and Encina
Ave*
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
32 Middlefield Rd and Palmer
Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
33 Middlefield Rd and Watkins
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
34 Middlefield Rd and Oak
Grove Ave
Intersection No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
35 Lane Pl and Middlefield Rd Intersection No Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 78 April 10, 2026 Page 10
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
36 De Bell Dr and Middlefield
Rd
Intersection No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
37 Middlefield Rd and San
Benito Dr
Intersection No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
Other Corridors
38 Oak Grove Ave and Oak
Grove Ave (cul-de-sac)
Intersection No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
39 Glenwood Ave and Laurel
St***
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
40 Oak Grove Ave and de Bell
Dr
Intersection No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
* Intersection is shared jurisdictionally with Unincorporated San Mateo County. ** Roadway is Caltrans jurisdiction.
*** Intersection is shared jurisdictionally with Menlo Park. **** The Town is currently preparing a study on this corridor (see Table 1).

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 79 April 10, 2026 Page 11
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

BELMONT
The City of Belmont’s prioritized projects can be found on page 18 to 20 of the “City of Belmont Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in.

Table 3: City of Belmont Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Anita Ave and El Camino
Real
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
2 Ruth Ave and El Camino
Real
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
3 El Camino Real and
Belmont Ave
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
4 El Camino Real and
North Rd
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
5 El Camino Real and
Davey Glen Rd
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
6 Belmont Canyon Rd (W)
and Ralston Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 80 April 10, 2026 Page 12
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 Pullman Ave and Lyall
Way
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
8 El Camino Real and 5th
Ave
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
9 Flashner Ln and El
Camino Real
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
10 El Camino Real and
Broadway
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
11 El Camino Real and
Emmett Ave
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
12 Davis Dr and Ralston Ave Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start
before 2031)
13 Oneill Ave and Old
County Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
14 Ralston Ave and Belmont
Canyon Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 81 April 10, 2026 Page 13
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 Merry Moppet Ln and
Ralston Ave
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
16 Belmont Canyon Rd (E)
and Ralston Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
17 Hill St and El Camino
Real
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
18 Sterling View Ave and
Old County Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
19 Belmont Canyon Rd and
Ralston Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
20 Lassen Dr and Ralston
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
21 Old County Rd and
Waltermire St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
22 El Camino Real and
Waltermire St
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 82 April 10, 2026 Page 14
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
23 Belmont Canyon Rd and
Ralston Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
24 Harbor Blvd and Us
Highway 101 Hwy
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
25 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Monroe Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
26 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Cipriani Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
27 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Lyon Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
28 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Forest Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
29 Ralston Ave and
Academy Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
30 Ralston Ave and
Maywood Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 83 April 10, 2026 Page 15
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
31 Ralston Ave and Furlong
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
32 Ralston Ave and Villa Ave Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start
before 2031)
33 Ralston Ave and Chula
Vista Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
34 Granada St and Ralston
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
35 Notre Dame Ave and
Ralston Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
36 Ralston Ave and Misty Ln Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start
before 2031)
37 Ralston Ave and Chevy St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start
before 2031)
38 El Camino Real, North
Road to F Street
Corridor Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 84 April 10, 2026 Page 16
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
39 Ralston Avenue, Villa
Street to west of South
Road
Corridor No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)
40 Ralston Avenue, Christian
Drive to Villa Street
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start
before 2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 85 April 10, 2026 Page 17
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

BRISBANE
The City of Brisbane prioritized projects can be found on page 19 to 22 of the “City of Brisbane Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: City of Brisbane Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Bayshore Blvd and Main
St
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
2 Bayshore Blvd and San
Bruno Ave
Intersection No X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
3 Bayshore Blvd and Tunnel
Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
4 Sierra Point Pkwy and
Lagoon Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
5 Beatty Rd and Tunnel Ave Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
6 Alana Way and Beatty Rd Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 86 April 10, 2026 Page 18
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 Sierra Point Pkwy 101 NB
Hwy and NB 101 Sierra
Point Pkwy Hwy
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 Tunnel Ave and Lagoon
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Bayshore Blvd and Valley
Dr
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
10 Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
and Hill Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
11 Bayshore Blvd and
Industrial Way
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
12 Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
and Bayshore Blvd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
13 Valley Dr and Park Ln Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
14 Park Pl and Valley Dr Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 87 April 10, 2026 Page 19
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 San Bruno Ave and
Mendocino St
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
16 Cypress Ln and Valley Dr Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
17 Hill Dr and Silverspot Dr Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
18 San Francisco Ave and
Old County Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
19 San Bruno Ave and
Mariposa St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
20 Old County Rd and Park
Ln
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
21 Klamath St and Visitacion
Ave
Intersection No X In progress / construction ready
(construction is in progress or dates
are known)
22 Santa Clara St and San
Bruno Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 88 April 10, 2026 Page 20
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
23 San Bruno Ave and
Alvarado St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
24 Glen Pkwy and San Bruno
Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
25 Lake St and San Bruno
Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
26 San Bruno Ave and Tulare
St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
27 Monterey St and San
Bruno Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
28 Ross Way and Glen Pkwy Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
29 San Francisco Ave and
Plumas St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
30 Park Pl and Park Ln Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 89 April 10, 2026 Page 21
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
31 San Francisco Ave and
Inyo St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
32 Mariposa St and
Visitacion Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
33 Visitacion Ave and
Monterey St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
34 Mariposa St and Inyo St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
35 Sierra Point Rd and
Humboldt Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
36 Solano St and Mendocino
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
37 Solano St and San
Francisco Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
38 Mariposa St and Solano
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 90 April 10, 2026 Page 22
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
39 Sierra Point Rd and
Lassen St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
40 Mono St and Klamath St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
41 Visitacion Ave and
Mendocino St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
42 Humboldt Rd and Lassen
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
43 Humboldt Rd and Lake St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
44 Solano St and Humboldt
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
45 Main St and Hill Dr Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
46 Gladys Ave and San Bruno
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 91 April 10, 2026 Page 23
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
47 Klamath St and San Bruno
Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
48 San Bruno Ave and
Thomas Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
49 Sierra Point Rd and Ross
Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
50 Humboldt Rd and Glen
Pkwy
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
51 Sierra Point Rd and Glen
Pkwy
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
52 Humboldt Rd and Kings
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
53 Humboldt Rd and Sierra
Point Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
54 Humboldt Rd and San
Diego Ct
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 92 April 10, 2026 Page 24
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
55 Mariposa St and Plumas
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
56 Alvarado St and Visitacion
Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
57 Alvarado St and Monterey
St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
58 Alvarado St and
Mendocino St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
59 William Ave and San
Bruno Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
60 Humboldt Rd and Annis
Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
61 Lake St and Glen Park
Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
62 Bayshore Blvd, Geneva
Ave to S city limits
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 93 April 10, 2026 Page 25
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
63 Valley Dr, Bayshore Blvd
to Hills Dr
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
64 Tunnel, N city limit to
Bayshore Blvd
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 94 April 10, 2026 Page 26
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

COLMA
The Town of Colma prioritized projects can be found on page 16 to 17 of the “Town of Colma Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Town of Colma Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Hillside Blvd, from
Serramonte Blvd to Town
limit
Corridor No X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
2 Serramonte Blvd & NB
Hwy on-ramp
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
3 Colma Blvd Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
4 Serramonte Blvd, from El
Camino Real to Hillside
Blvd
Corridor No X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
4 Serramonte Blvd, from
Junipero Serra Blvd to El
Camino Real
Corridor No X X X In progress / construction ready
(construction is in progress or dates
are known)
5 Collins Ave, from
Serramonte Blvd to El
Camino Real
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 95 April 10, 2026 Page 27
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
6 El Camino Real Corridor Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase (Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
6 El Camino Real &
Mission Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
7 Junipero Serra Blvd &
Southgate Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 Junipero Serra Blvd &
Colma Blvd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Phillip Dr & Junipero
Serra Blvd
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
10 Hillside Blvd &
Serramonte Blvd
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
11 Lawndale Blvd Corridor No X X Complete (a safety project has been implemented)
12 Junipero Serra Blvd, from
Colma Blvd to Collins
Ave
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 96 April 10, 2026 Page 28
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

EAST PALO ALTO
The City of East Palo Alto prioritized projects can be found on page 17 to 18 of the “City of East Palo Alto Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 6.

Table 6: City of East Palo Alto Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Purdue Ave and
University Ave
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
2 University Ave and
Weeks St
Intersection Yes X X In progress / construction ready
(construction is in progress or dates
are known)
3 University Ave and
Adams Dr
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
4 University Ave and
Michigan Ave
Intersection Yes X X Complete (a safety project has been implemented)
5 Bay Rd and University
Ave
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
6 Notre Dame Ave and
University Ave
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
7 University Ave and
Kavanaugh Dr
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 97 April 10, 2026 Page 29
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
8 University Ave and
Sacramento St
Intersection Yes X X In progress / construction ready
(construction is in progress or dates
are known)
9 Donohoe St and
University Ave
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
10 O’Brien Dr and
University Ave
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
11 Cooley Ave and
University Ave
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
12 University Ave and
Runnymede St
Intersection Yes X X In progress / construction ready
(construction is in progress or dates
are known)
13 University Ave and Bell
St
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
14 Woodland Ave and
University Ave
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
15 Gloria Way and Bay Rd Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 98 April 10, 2026 Page 30
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
16 Glen Way and Bay Rd Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
17 Bay Rd and Palo Alto
Verde Ave
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
18 University Ave and 101
Ramps
Intersection Yes X X Complete (a safety project has been implemented)
19 Dumbarton Ave and
Bay Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
20 Demeter St and Bay Rd Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
21 Bay Rd and Addison
Ave
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
22 Oakwood Dr and Bay
Rd
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
23 Pulgas Ave and Bay Rd Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
24 Bay Rd and Fordham St Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 99 April 10, 2026 Page 31
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
25 Bay Rd and Ralmar Ave Intersection No X X Complete (a safety project has been implemented)
26 Clarke Ave and Illinois
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
27 Newbridge St and
Menalto Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
28 Newbridge St and
Poplar Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
29 Bay Rd and Addison
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
30 Mello St and
Newbridge St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
31 Saratoga Ave and
Newbridge St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
32 Bay Rd, Newbridge St
to Pulgas Ave
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
33 University Ave (SR 109),
N city limits to
Donohoe Rd
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 100
April 10, 2026 Page 32
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
34 Newbridge St, Bay Rd
to W city Limits
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 101
April 10, 2026 Page 33
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

FOSTER CITY
The City of Foster City prioritized projects can be found on page 17 to 18 of the “City of Foster City Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: City of Foster City Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Chess Dr and Foster
City Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
2 Regulus St and
Edgewater Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
3 Catamaran St and Shell
Blvd
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
4 Galleon Ln and Foster
City Blvd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
5 Hillsdale Blvd and
Parkway Ln
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
6 Marlin Ave and Foster
City Blvd
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 102
April 10, 2026 Page 34
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 Foster City Blvd and
3rd Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 Beach Park Blvd and
Egret St
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Altair Ave and
Edgewater Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
10 Marlin Ave and Beach
Park Blvd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
11 3rd Ave and Mariners
Island Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
12 Commons Ln and
Metro Center Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
13 Foster City Blvd and
Caravel Ln
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
14 Shell Blvd and Bounty
Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 103
April 10, 2026 Page 35
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 Hillsdale Blvd and
Meridian Bay Ln
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
16 Hillsdale Blvd and
Admiralty Ln
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
17 Foster City Blvd and
Civic Center Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
18 Foster City Blvd and
Admiralty Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
19 Shell Blvd and Civic
Center Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
20 Hillsdale Blvd and
Portal Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
21 Promontory Point Ln
and Hillsdale Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
22 Foster City Blvd and
Hillsdale Blvd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 104
April 10, 2026 Page 36
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
23 Edgewater Blvd and
Dorado Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
24 Beach Park Blvd and
Swordfish St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
25 Edgewater Blvd and
Ram Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
26 Tarpon St and Beach
Park Blvd
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
27 Foster City Blvd, Chess
Dr to Bounty Dr
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
28 Hillsdale Blvd, Sea
Spray Ln to north of
Pilgrim Dr
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
29 Shell Blvd, Hillsdale
Blvd to Beach Park
Blvd
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
30 Edgewater Blvd,
Hillsdale Blvd to Beach
Park Blvd
Corridor No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 105
April 10, 2026 Page 37
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

HALF MOON BAY
The City of Half Moon Bay prioritized projects can be found on page 18 to 19 of the “City of Half Moon Bay Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 8.

Table 8: City of Half Moon Bay Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Highway 1 and Poplar St Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
2 Highway 1 and Ruisseau
Francais Ave
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
3 Main St and Lewis Foster
Dr
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
4 Highway 1 and
Miramontes Point Rd
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
5 Highway 1 and Fairway
Dr
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
6 Highway 1 and Mirada
Rd
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 106
April 10, 2026 Page 38
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 Highway 1 and Redondo
Beach
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 Highway 1 and Roosevelt
Blvd
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Highway 1 and Filbert St Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
10 Highway 1 and Spindrift
Way
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
11 Filbert St and Purissima
St and Main St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
12 Highway 1 and Seymour
St
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
13 Church St and Kelly Ave Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase (Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
14 Highway 1 and Highway
92 Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 107
April 10, 2026 Page 39
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 Kelly Ave Corridor No X X X Near-term / concept phase (Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
16 Main St Corridor No X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
17 Poplar St, from Highway
1 to Railroad Ave
Corridor No X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
18 Highway 1, from
Miramontes Point Rd to
Main St South
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
19 Highway 1, from Main
Spindrift Way to Russeau
Francais Ave
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
20 Wavecrest Rd, from
Highway 1 to the Coastal
Trail
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
21 Miramontes Ave, from
Alsace Lorraine to east
end
Corridor No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 108
April 10, 2026 Page 40
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

HILLSBOROUGH
The Town of Hillsborough prioritized projects can be found on page 15 to 19 of the “Town of Hillsborough Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Town of Hillsborough Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Skyline Blvd and
Skyfarm Dr
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
2 Hayne Rd and Golf
Course Dr
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
3 Skyline Blvd and
Butternut Dr
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
4 Skyline Blvd and Rowan
Tree Ln
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
5 El Cerrito Ave and
Gramercy Dr
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
6 Santa Inez Ave and
Arlington Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 109
April 10, 2026 Page 41
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 Black Mountain Rd and
Denise Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 Black Mountain Rd and
Wedgewood Dr
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Merner Rd and Crystal
Springs Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
10 Crystal Springs Ter and
Crystal Springs Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
11 Crystal Springs Rd and
Ridgeway Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
12 Woodridge Rd and
Crystal Springs Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
13 Crystal Springs Rd and
El Cerrito Ave
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
14 Stonehedge Rd and
Baywood Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 110
April 10, 2026 Page 42
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 Hayne Rd and Golf
Course Dr
Intersection Yes X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
16 Kammerer Ct and
Bellevue Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
17 Black Mountain Rd and
Denise Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
18 Barbara Way and Hayne
Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
19 El Cerrito Ave and
Stonehedge Rd
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
20 Eucalyptus Ave and
Ralston Ave
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
21 Stonepine Rd and
Barroilhet Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
22 Ralston Ave and
Chateau Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 111
April 10, 2026 Page 43
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
23 Homeplace Ct and
Barroilhet Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
24 Eucalyptus Ave and
Tamarack Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
25 Stonepine Rd and
Stonepine Ct
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
26 Tamarack Dr and
Farmhill Ct
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
27 Tartan Trail Rd and
Lakeview Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
28 Downey Way and Acorn
Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
29 Fagan Dr and Margo Ln Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
30 Fagan Dr and Jackling
Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 112
April 10, 2026 Page 44
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
31 Irwin Dr and Forest
View Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
32 Forest View Ave and
Denham Ct
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
33 Carmelita Ave and
Armsby Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
34 Armsby Dr and
Reynolds Ct
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
35 Eucalyptus Ave and Geri
Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
36 El Cerrito Ave and
Waverly Pl
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
37 Warm Canyon Way and
Remillard Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
38 Hayne Rd and Darrell
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 113
April 10, 2026 Page 45
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
39 Remillard Dr and
Mosswood Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
40 Barbara Way and Hayne
Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
41 Camphor Ct and Rowan
Tree Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
42 Sherwood Ct and De
Sabla Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
43 Roehampton Rd and
Richmond Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
44 El Cerrito Ave and Poett
Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
45 Roblar Ave and Milford
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
46 Laureldale Rd and
Bridge Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 114
April 10, 2026 Page 46
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
47 Roehampton Rd and
Poett Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
48 Santa Inez Ave and
Santa Maria Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
49 Stonehedge Rd and St
Francis Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
50 Roblar Ave and El
Cerrito Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
51 Roblar Ave and Severn
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
52 Roblar Ave and Ericson
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
53 El Cerrito Ave and
Wickham Pl
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
54 Fallenleaf Dr and Bridge
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 115
April 10, 2026 Page 47
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
55 Homs Ct and El Cerrito
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
56 Stonehedge Rd and
Bridge Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
57 Floribunda Ave and
Pepper Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
58 Floribunda Ave and
Highgate Ln
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
59 Fairway Cir and
Floribunda Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
60 Pepper Ave and
Summerholme Pl
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
61 Newhall Rd and Willow
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
62 Alberta Way and
Roberts Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 116
April 10, 2026 Page 48
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
63 Alberta Way and Hayne
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
64 Robinwood Ln and
Hayne Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
65 Roberts Way and Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
66 Butternut Dr and Privet
Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
67 Churchill Dr And Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
68 Privet Dr and Churchill
Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
69 Grevillea Ct and
Butternut Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
70 Rowan Tree Ln and
Darrell Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 117
April 10, 2026 Page 49
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
71 Poett Rd and Roblar
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
72 Redwood Dr and Sierra
Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
73 Bridge Rd and
Redwood Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
74 Fallenleaf Dr and
Uplands Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
75 Uplands Dr and
Normandy Ct
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
76 Uplands Dr and
Redwood Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
77 Uplands Dr and
Rockridge Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
78 Rockridge Rd and
Greenbriar Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 118
April 10, 2026 Page 50
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
79 Rockridge Rd and
Creekwood Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
80 Barroilhet Ave and
Conifer Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
81 Eucalyptus Ave and
Barroilhet Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
82 Woodland Dr and
Tournament Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
83 Fairway Cir and Fairway
Cir
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
84 Floribunda Ave and
Walnut Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
85 Eucalyptus Ave and
New Place Rd
Intersection No X Complete (a safety project has been
implemented)
86 Eucalyptus Ave and
Floribunda Ave
Intersection No X Complete (a safety project has been
implemented)
87 Floribunda Ave and
Madrone Pl
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 119
April 10, 2026 Page 51
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
88 Eucalyptus Ave and
Bayberry Pl
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
89 Parkside Ave and
Ralston Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
90 Eucalyptus Ave and
Tevis Pl
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
91 Skyline Blvd (SR 35), N
town limit to Hayne Rd
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
92 Crystal Springs Rd, El
Cerrito Rd to S town
limit
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 120
April 10, 2026 Page 52
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

SAN CARLOS
The City of San Carlos prioritized projects can be found on page 18 to 21 of the “City of San Carlos Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 10.

Table 10: City of San Carlos Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Brittan Ave and Cordilleras
Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
2 Brittan Ave and Cedar St Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
3 Brittan Ave and Elm St Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
4 Greenwood Ave and
Tamarack Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
5 Brittan Ave and Rosewood
Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
6 Woodland Ave and Brittan
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 121
April 10, 2026 Page 53
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 Brittan Ave and Chestnut
St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 Brittan Ave and Orange
Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Walnut St and Brittan Ave Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
10 Brittan Ave and Old
County Rd
Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
11 Industrial Rd and Brittan
Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
12 Laurel St and Brittan Ave Intersection No X X Near-term / concept phase (Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
13 Industrial Rd and
Washington St
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
14 Edmonds Rd and Edmond
Dr
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 122
April 10, 2026 Page 54
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and San Carlos Ave
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
16 Tanklage Rd and Industrial
Rd
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
17 Cambridge St and San
Carlos Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
18 Circle Star Way and G St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
19 Brittan Ave and Hudson Ct Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
20 Upland Ave and San Carlos
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
21 Brittan Ave and Dayton
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
22 Brittan Ave and Brook St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 123
April 10, 2026 Page 55
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
23 Industrial Rd and San
Carlos Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
24 American St and Industrial
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
24 Industrial Rd and
Montgomery Ln
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
25 Terminal Way and
Industrial Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
26 Center St and Industrial Rd Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
27 Industrial Way and Taylor
Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
28 Industrial Rd and Cherry Ln Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
29 San Carlos Ave and Laurel
St
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 124
April 10, 2026 Page 56
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
30 Brittan Ave and Alameda
De Las Pulgas
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
31 Rockridge Rd and Alameda
De Las Pulgas
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
32 Lupin Ave and Alameda De
Las Pulgas
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
33 San Carlos Ave and Club
Dr
Intersection No X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
34 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Alma St
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
35 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Graceland Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
36 Old Country Rd and Taylor
Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
37 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Carmelita Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 125
April 10, 2026 Page 57
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
38 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and St Francis Way
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
39 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Pine Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
40 Quarry Rd and Old Country
Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
41 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Madera Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
42 Eaton Ave and Alameda De
Las Pulgas
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
43 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Oakview Dr
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
44 Hill Way and Alameda De
Las Pulgas
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
45 Alameda De Las Pulgas
and Wildwood Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 126
April 10, 2026 Page 58
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
46 Ridge Rd and Alameda De
Las Pulgas
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
47 Orange Ave and Arroyo
Ave
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
48 Arroyo Ave and Walnut St Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
49 Cedar St and Arroyo Ave Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
50 Brittan Ave, from Industrial
Rd to Crestview Dr
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
51 San Carlos Ave, from city
limits W of Cranfield to E
of Industrial Rd
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
52 Industrial Rd, from city
limits N of Quarry to
Center St
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
53 Alameda De Las Pulgas,
from San Carlos Ave to
Eaton Ave
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 127
April 10, 2026 Page 59
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
54 Old County Rd, from
Commercial St to city limit
S of Bing St
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
55 Arroyo Ave, from Tamarack
Ave to Industrial Rd
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
56 Cedar St, from San Carlos
Ave to Brittan Ave
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
57 Laurel St, from Bush St to
Brittan Ave
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
58 Holly St, from Magnolia
Ave to Industrial Rd
Corridor No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
59 Cherry St, from Cedar St to
El Camino Real
Corridor No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
60 Cordilleras Ave, from San
Carlos Ave to Brittan Ave
Corridor No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
61 Howard Ave, from Old
County Rd to Industrial
Ave
Corridor No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 128
April 10, 2026 Page 60
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
62 Chestnut St, from San
Carlos Ave to Woodland
Ave
Corridor No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
63 Bransten St, from Old
County Rd to Industrial Rd
Corridor No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
64 Commercial Ave, from Old
County Rd to Industrial Rd
Corridor No Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
65 Washington St, from Old
County Rd to Industrial Rd
Corridor No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 129
April 10, 2026 Page 61
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

WOODSIDE
The Town of Woodside prioritized projects can be found on page 18 to 21 of the “Town of Woodside Local Road Safety Plan.” The prioritized projects and timeframes are shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Town of Woodside Project Timeframes
ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
1 Woodside Rd and
Lindenbrook Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
2 Martinez Rd and La Honda
Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
3 Portola Rd and Old La
Honda Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
4 Woodside Rd and
Northgate Dr
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
5 Interstate Highway 280
Hwy and Farm Hill Blvd
Intersection Yes X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
6 La Honda Rd and Portola
Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 130
April 10, 2026 Page 62
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
7 La Honda Rd and Skyline
Blvd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
8 La Honda Rd and Fox Hill
Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
9 Portola Rd and Mountain
Home Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
10 La Honda Rd and
Grandview Dr
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
11 Portola Rd and Home Rd Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
12 Woodside Rd and Bear
Gulch Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
13 Canada Rd and Woodside
Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
14 High Rd and Woodside Rd Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 131
April 10, 2026 Page 63
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
15 Miramontes Rd and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
16 Woodside Rd and Fox
Hollow Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
17 Woodside Rd and Oakhill Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
18 Portola Rd and Montecito
Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
19 Canada Rd and Corto Ln Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
20 Canada Rd and Olive Hill
Ln
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
21 Portola Rd and Phillip Rd Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
22 Skywood Way and La
Honda Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 132
April 10, 2026 Page 64
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
23 Tripp Rd and Woodside
Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
24 Portola Rd and Forest
View Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
25 Southgate Dr and State
Highway 84 Hwy
Intersection Yes X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
26 Smoke Tree Ln and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
27 Canada Rd and Eucalyptus
Ct
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
28 Canada Rd and Bardet Rd Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
29 Canada Rd and Arbor Ct Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
30 Canada Rd and Alta Vista
Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 133
April 10, 2026 Page 65
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
31 Canada Rd and Neuman
Ln
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
32 Canada Rd and
Runnymede Rd
Intersection No X X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
33 Why Worry Ln and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
34 Woodside Rd and Roberta
Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
35 La Honda Rd and Friars Ln Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
36 Kings Mountain Rd and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
37 Woodside Rd and Martin
Ln
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
38 Woodside Rd and Bridle
Ln
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 134
April 10, 2026 Page 66
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
39 Woodside Rd and
Montelena Ct
Intersection Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
40 Canada Rd and Mission
Trail Rd
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
41 Canada Rd and Glenwood
Ave
Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
42 Canada Rd and Laning Dr Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
43 Tadin Ln and Portola Rd Intersection No X X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
44 Woodside Rd and Albion
Ave
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
45 Moore Rd and State
Highway 84 Hwy
Intersection Yes X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
46 Whiskey Hill Rd and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 135
April 10, 2026 Page 67
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
47 Quail Meadows Dr and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
48 Woodside Rd and Hobart
Heights Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
49 Shine Rd and Woodside
Rd
Intersection Yes X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
50 Canada Ln and Canada Rd Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
51 Woodside Rd and
Haciendas Dr
Intersection Yes X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
52 Dean Rd and Canada Rd Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
53 Canada Rd and Monticello
Ct
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
54 Canada Rd and Jefferson
Ave
Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 136
April 10, 2026 Page 68
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
55 Canada Rd and Godetia Dr Intersection No X X Long-term / planning phase (construction would not start before
2031)
56 Churchill Ave and
Woodside Rd
Intersection Yes X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)
57 Kings Mountain Rd and
Greer Rd
Intersection No X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
58 Portola Rd, Family Farm
Rd to E town limit
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
59 Canada Rd, W town limit
to Woodside Rd (SR84)
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
60 Portola Rd, Woodside Rd
(SR84) to E town limit
Corridor No X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
61 Woodside Rd, E town limit
to Haciendas Dr
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
62 Woodside Rd, Haciendas
Dr to Mountain Home Rd
Corridor Yes X X Near-term / concept phase
(Construction is expected to start by
2031, but dates are not scheduled)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 137
April 10, 2026 Page 69
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Strategy and Project Selection Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ID Location Corridor/
Intersection
State
Highway?
Vehicle
Emphasis
Bicycle
Emphasis
Ped
Emphasis
Timeframe
63 Woodside Road,
Mountain Home Road to
Kings Mountain Road
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)
64 Woodside Rd/La Honda
Rd, Kings Mountain Rd to
S town limit
Corridor Yes X X X Long-term / planning phase
(construction would not start before
2031)

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 138
April 10, 2026 Page 70
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Progress and Transparency Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Progress and Transparency
This section serves as an addendum to the “Progress and Transparency” section of the Countywide LRSP.

The “Progress and Transparency” section (pages 74-75 of the Countywide LRSP) details potential measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for tracking progress. This addendum provides additional information on the reporting structure as well as targets for the various MOEs.

COUNTYWIDE LRSP GOALS
The MOEs presented in this document aim to measure the County’s progress at achieving the Countywide LRSP’s goals. The goals (page 16 of the Countywide LRSP) include the following:
◼ Regularly review crash history and community needs to identify and prioritize opportunities to reduce crash risk for roadway users of all ages and abilities. ◼ Partner with local agencies to incorporate roadway safety into all actions. ◼ Implement context-appropriate safety countermeasures systemically and as part of all projects to target emphasis areas and underserved communities.
◼ Support agencies in providing opportunities for citizen engagement to identify issues and inform Countywide safety solutions.
◼ Embrace the Safe System Approach to promote engineering and non-engineering strategies in the community.
◼ Work with agencies to monitor safety projects and implementation to track progress towards goals.

Progress Reporting Structure

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TSAC)
The Transportation Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC) is a newly formed body which will consist of representatives from each of the 21 local agencies and relevant local, county, regional, and state agencies.

The TSAC will oversee evaluation of the Countywide LRSP and will facilitate collaboration across agencies to advance larger initiatives. Initiating the TSAC was a recommendation identified in the Countywide LRSP (page 57). The TSAC is set to officially commence in mid-2026. It will further refine the scope of the monitoring, including formalizing a monitoring structure for the 11 jurisdictions which did not participate in creating the Countywide LRSP.

REPORTING
To track the progress of each goal, C/CAG and the TSAC will publish an annual monitoring report. The report will feature MOEs aggregated at the countywide level and disaggregated to the jurisdiction level if there is an expected imbalance in outcomes among jurisdictions. C/CAG will issue a draft report to be reviewed by the local agencies and TSAC participants. The report will then be presented to the TSAC and to the C/CAG Board of Directors, who will assess implementation progress.

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 139
April 10, 2026 Page 71
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Progress and Transparency Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

The recommended MOEs are categorized below based on whether they focus on process or outcome.

Process MOEs
Process MOEs judge progress, and ultimately success or failure, based on the actions being taken to advance recommendations in the Countywide LRSP. The following process MOEs will be included in the report:
◼ P1: Number of TSAC meetings
◼ P2: Number of project locations identified in this plan advanced to construction ◼ P3: Number of projects which address an emphasis area1 advanced to construction ◼ P4: Share of identified projects within underserved communities advanced to construction ◼ P5: Number of trainings conducted regarding Safe System elements, available tools, or practices ◼ P6: Amount of grant money obtained for a high-visibility media campaign ◼ P7: Percent of school participation in SRTS and roadway safety education opportunities ◼ P8: Number of engagement touchpoints for safety plans or projects.

Outcome MOEs
Outcome MOEs track crash totals, which provide a direct measure or roadway safety. C/CAG can use these measures to understand if their actions have been effective. C/CAG will gather crash data from available sources to calculate each of these measures. The following outcome measures will be included in the annual report:
◼ General crash statistics
o O1: Total reported crashes
o O2: Fatal/severe injury crashes
◼ Emphasis area-related crash statistics
o O3: Crashes involving Pedestrians
o O4: Crashes Involving Bicyclists
o O5: Crashes under poor lighting conditions (in the evening) o O6: Crashes along Unsignalized intersections on arterials/collectors o O7: Crashes involving people between the ages of 15 and 34 o O8: Crashes involving people above the age of 50
o O9: Motor Vehicle crashes along roadway segments
o O10: Crashes along high-speed roadways
o O11: Crashes involving Alcohol
Further information on each MOE is presented in the two following sections. 1 Projects should address a specific crash type or factor such as improving a crosswalk to address pedestrian crashes.

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 140
April 10, 2026 Page 72
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Progress and Transparency Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Process Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs)
Each process MOE directly aligns with one or more goals identified in the Countywide LRSP (listed on page 1 of this addendum). Table 12: Process Measures of Effectiveness identifies the MOEs corresponding to each goal. The table also includes a numerical target for each MOE.

Table 12: Process Measures of Effectiveness
Measures of Effectiveness Annual Numerical
Target
P1: Number of TSAC meetings 4 (1 per quarter)
P2: Number of project locations identified in this plan advanced to construction
2 per jurisdiction
P3: Number of projects which address a Countywide LRSP emphasis area advanced to construction1
1 per jurisdiction
P4: Share of identified projects within underserved communities advanced to construction
5% of total identified
projects
P5: Number of trainings conducted regarding Safe System elements, available tools, or practices
1 per jurisdiction
P6: Amount of grant money obtained for a high-visibility media campaign 1 campaign funded (countywide)
P7: Percent of school participation in Safe Routes to School and roadway safety education opportunities
25% countywide
P8: Number of engagement activities for identified projects or safety planning activities
2 per jurisdiction
1: Projects should address a specific crash type or factor such as improving a crosswalk to address pedestrian crashes.

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 141
April 10, 2026 Page 73
C/CAG Countywide LRSP Addendum Progress and Transparency Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Outcome Measures of Effectiveness
The outcome MOEs were selected to align with the Countywide LRSP’s emphasis areas (located on pages 36 and 37 of the Countywide LRSP). C/CAG’s emphasis areas are:
◼ Pedestrian and bicyclist safety
◼ Nighttime/low light safety
◼ Unsignalized intersections on arterials/collectors
◼ Vulnerable age groups (youth and aging)
◼ Motor vehicle speed related roadway segment crashes
◼ High speed roadways (35+mph)
◼ Alcohol involvement
Table 13 lists each MOE and their corresponding emphasis area. C/CAG’s member jurisdictions have a goal to eliminate all fatal and severe injury crashes by 2050 and should aim for a year-over-year reduction in each of these metrics. The TSAC may re-select new MOEs every 3-5 years as new emphasis areas arise or countywide conditions significantly change.

Table 13: Outcome Performance Measures
Emphasis Area Measure of Effectiveness
No specific emphasis area; overall safety
performance
O1: Total reported crashes
Vision Zero O2: Fatal/severe injury crashes
Pedestrian and bicyclist safety – O3: Crashes involving pedestrians – O4: Crashes Involving bicyclists
Nighttime/low light safety O5: Crashes reported under poor lighting conditions (e.g., crashes reported in the evening)
Unsignalized intersections on arterials/collectors O6: Crashes reported at unsignalized intersections on arterials/collectors
Vulnerable age groups (youth and aging) – O7: Crashes involving people between the ages of 15 and 34
– O8: Crashes involving people above the age
of 50
Motor vehicle speed related roadway segment
crashes
O9: Motor vehicle crashes reported as speedrelated crashes High speed roadways (35+mph) O10: Crashes along roadways with a posted speed limit of 35 mph or higher
Alcohol involvement O11: Crashes involving alcohol

5.6 Attachment 2 - Addendum to County Wide Local Roadway Safety Plan 142
DATE: July 20, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director
Yelena Cappello, Principal Management Analyst
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH THERMAL

MECHANICAL INC FOR REPAIRS TO CITYWIDE HEATING,

VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEMS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 FOR A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED
AMOUNT OF $200,000

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing:

1. Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc., increasing the annual not-to-exceed amount for citywide heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system repair services by $50,000, from $150,000 to $200,000 annually; and

2. Finding that this action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 Class 1-Existing Facilities.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to aging HVAC infrastructure and the continued need for urgent repairs, additional contract authority is needed under the agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc. Staff recommends increasing the annual not-to-exceed amount by $50,000, from $150,000 to $200,000, to support ongoing HVAC repair needs through the remainder of the fiscal year.

5.7 Staff Report
143

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Building Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department maintains the City’s buildings and facilities. The City contracts for routine HVAC service and repair because this work is specialized. At its meeting in November 2024, the City Council approved an agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc. for programmed HVAC maintenance and repairs to existing equipment. The agreement includes $28,277 annually for Citywide HVAC System Programmed Maintenance, and a not to exceed amount of $150,000 for unforeseen repairs, from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027, with two optional extensions of one year each.

Due to aging HVAC infrastructure in City buildings, several systems have required urgent repair work to maintain safe and functional operations. Recent work has included emergency troubleshooting, replacement of failed variable air volume (VAV) components and other critical parts, repairs to underperforming and aging units, and work involving systems that circulate hot water. These repairs were necessary to maintain heating, cooling, and ventilation in occupied facilities, including the Council Chambers and recreation spaces used for rentals, classes, and camps.

Many of the City’s HVAC and control components are more than 25 years old and are becoming obsolete, contributing to increasingly frequent and complex repairs. Staff recommends increasing the agreement’s annual not-to-exceed amount by $50,000, from $150,000 to $200,000, to provide contract authority for approximately $38,000 in repairs completed during FY 2025-26 and sufficient annual authority for additional repairs during the remaining term of the agreement.

The HVAC Improvements in City Buildings project, CIP 301-685, will address needed HVAC replacements and is scheduled to begin this fiscal year. Following completion of those improvements, maintenance needs are expected to decrease. The existing agreement does not include the new Community Center, as that HVAC system will remain under warranty maintenance for one year. Staff will return with a contract amendment for the Community Center, if needed, after the warranty period ends.

CEQA
This action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Existing Facilities) as it involves the maintenance of existing building systems.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of Amendment No. 1, is $50,000 per year, increasing the not to exceed amount of $150,000 to $200,000. There are no changes to the preventative and routine maintenance portion of this contract. There are sufficient funds available in the Building Maintenance budget to cover additional costs. If expenditures are projected to exceed

5.7 Staff Report
144
the amount available in the FY 26-27 and FY 27-28 adopted budget, staff will return to the City Council to request an additional appropriation.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Contract Amendment No. 1
Attachment 3 – Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.

5.7 Staff Report
145
RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO.1 IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 TO THE AGREEMENT TO THERMAL MECHANICAL INC. FOR CITYWIDE HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR

CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM REPAIR FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 ANNUALLY AND FINDING PROJECT EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301 (CLASS 1-EXISTING FACILITIES)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City contracts for routine HVAC service and repair because this work is specialized; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting in November 2024, the City Council approved an agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc. for programmed HVAC maintenance and repairs to existing equipment, including $28,277 annually for Citywide HVAC System Programmed Maintenance, and a not to exceed amount of $150,000 for unforeseen repairs, from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027, with two optional extensions of one year each; and
WHEREAS, due to aging HVAC infrastructure in City buildings, several systems have required urgent repair work to address failing equipment and restore heating, cooling, and ventilation in City facilities; and
WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No. 1 increases the not to exceed amount by $50,000 from $150,000 to $200,000, to provide contract authority for approximately for repairs completed during FY 2025-26, and ensure sufficient authority is in place for the remainder of the agreement; and
WHEREAS, the project is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.) as this action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby:

1. Approve Contract Amendment No. 1 in an amount of $50,000 to the agreement to Thermal Mechanical Inc. for Citywide Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System Repair for a total amount not to exceed $200,000 annually, and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment; and

5.7 Attachment 1 - Resolution
146

2. Find that this action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (c) (Class 1-Existing Facilities).

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 20th day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.7 Attachment 1 - Resolution
147

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1)
DATE: July 20, 2026

ACCOUNT NO.: 505-0550-419-42-46
PROJECT: ANNUAL HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR

CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM

PROGRAMMED MAINTENANCE AND SYSTEM
REPAIR
TO: Thermal Mechanical, Inc.

CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Thermal Mechanical, Inc. and City of Foster City Based on mutual agreement, the parties agree to amend the Agreement dated November 4, 2024 (“Agreement”) to add additional services for unanticipated system repairs to HVAC unit at City Council Chambers, , which are identified as follows:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
ANNUAL PROGRAMMED MAINTENANCE $ 28,277
SYSTEM REPAIR – NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT $ 150,000
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1) TO

INCREASE SYSTEM REPAIR AMOUNTS DUE TO UNANTICIPATED REPAIRS NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT $ 50,000
TOTAL REVISED AGREEMENT AMOUNT $ 228,227
Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and provisions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
[Signatures on Next Page]

5.7 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No 1
148
Thermal Mechanical Inc. have given careful consideration to the work proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, to provide all equipment, furnish all materials except as may otherwise be noted above, and to perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and to accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.

SUBMITTED BY:

GERARDO DELFIN DATE

PROJECT MANAGER
ACCEPTED BY:

DAVID ROOD DATE

PRESIDENT, THERMAL MECHANICAL, INC
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:

ANDREW BROZYNA DATE

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR CITY:

ART KIESEL DATE
MAYOR
ATTEST:

BY:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS DATE

CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY:

BENJAMIN L STOCK DATE

CITY ATTORNEY

5.7 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No 1
149
1 VENDOR AGREEMENT FOR

ANNUAL HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING ( HVAC) SYSTEM

PROGRAMMED MAINTENANCE AND SYSTEM REPAIR
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 4th day of November, 2024 by and between the City of Foster City hereinafter called "CITY" and Thermal Mechanical, Inc. hereinafter called "VENDOR".

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into with reference to the following facts and circumstances:

A. That CITY desires to engage VENDOR to provide a product and/or services to the CITY;
B. That VENDOR is qualified to provide the product and/or services to the CITY and; C. That the CITY has elected to engage VENDOR upon the terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth.

1. A. Services. The services to be performed by VENDOR under this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit A, which is, by this reference, incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though it were fully set forth herein.

Performance of the work specified in said Exhibit A is hereby made an obligation of VENDOR under this Agreement, subject to any changes that may be made subsequently hereto upon the mutual written agreement of the said parties.

Where in conflict, the terms of this Agreement supersede and prevail over any terms set forth in Exhibit A.

B. Product. The product to be supplied by VENDOR under this Agreement is set forth in Exhibit A which is, by this reference, incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though it were fully set forth herein.

Timely delivery of the product specified in said Exhibit A is hereby made an obligation of VENDOR under this Agreement, subject to any changes that may be made subsequently hereto upon the mutual written agreement of the said parties.

2. Term; Termination.
a) The term of this Agreement shall commence upon January 1, 2025 and shall expire upon December 31, 2027, unless extended at the CITY’s sole discretion for up to two (2) one-year (12 months) increments. CITY shall Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
150
2 give VENDOR notice of its wish to renew at least 90 days prior to end of the existing term.
b) Notwithstanding the provisions of (a) above, the City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving written notice not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of termination, which date shall be included in said notice. CITY shall compensate VENDOR for any product delivered and/or for services rendered, and reimburse VENDOR for costs and expenses incurred, to the date of termination, calculated in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3. In ascertaining the services actually rendered to the date of termination, consideration shall be given both to completed work and work in process of completion. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed a limitation upon the right of CITY to terminate this Agreement for cause, or otherwise to exercise such rights or pursue such remedies as may accrue to CITY hereunder.

3. Compensation; Expenses; Payment. CITY shall compensate VENDOR for all products supplied or services performed by VENDOR hereunder as shown in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the combined total of compensation and reimbursement of costs payable hereunder shall not exceed the sums indicated in Exhibit B, unless additional amounts have been approved in advance of supplying the product, performing the services or incurring the costs and expenses by CITY’s City Council evidenced by motion duly made and carried.

Compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses hereunder shall be payable upon VENDOR meeting contract milestones as defined in Exhibit B. Billing shall include an itemized statement, briefly describing by task and labor category or cost/expense items billed.

4. Additional Services. In the event CITY desires the delivery of additional products or performance of additional services not otherwise included within Exhibit A, such products or services shall be authorized in advance by CITY’s City Manager (for contracts less than $50,000) or City Council (for contracts $ 50,000 or more) by motion duly made and carried. Such amendment to this Agreement shall include a description of the product to be delivered or services to be performed thereunder, the maximum compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses payable therefor, the time of performance thereof, and such other matters as the parties deem appropriate. Except to the extent modified by written amendment, all other terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed incorporated in each such amendment.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
151
3 5. Records. VENDOR shall keep and maintain accurate records of products delivered or of all time expended in performing services and costs and expenses incurred relating thereto. Said records shall be available to CITY for review and copying during regular business hours at VENDOR’s place of business or as otherwise agreed upon by the parties.

6. Authorization. This Agreement becomes effective when endorsed by both parties in the space provided below.

7. Documents. All documents, plans, drawings, renderings, and other papers, or copies thereof, as finally rendered, prepared by VENDOR pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, shall, upon preparation and delivery to CITY, become the property of CITY.

8. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the relationship of VENDOR to the CITY is that of an independent contractor and all persons working for or under the direction of VENDOR are its agents or employees and not agents or employees of the CITY.

9. Schedule. VENDOR shall adhere to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A; provided, that CITY shall grant reasonable extensions of time for the delivery of products or performance of services occasioned by governmental reviews of VENDOR’s work product or other unavoidable delays; provided, further, that such unavoidable delay shall not include strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, or other labor disturbances conducted by, or on behalf of, VENDOR’s officers or employees.

VENDOR acknowledges the importance to CITY of timely delivery of products or services and agrees to put forth its best professional efforts to perform in a manner consistent with that schedule.

10. Indemnity. To the fullest extent allowed by law, VENDOR hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and save harmless CITY and Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, suits, actions liability, loss, damage, expense, cost ( including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation) of every nature, kind or description, which may be brought against, or suffered or sustained by, CITY or Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees or agents caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, the negligence, intentional tortuous act or omission, or willful misconduct of VENDOR, its officers, employees, subcontractors or agents in the performance of any services or work pursuant to this Agreement.

The duty of VENDOR to indemnify and save harmless, as set forth herein, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
152
4 Civil Code; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to require VENDOR to indemnify CITY and Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees and agents against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code.

VENDOR’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law.

The defense and indemnification obligations of this agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained within this Agreement.

11. Insurance. VENDOR shall acquire and maintain Workers’ Compensation, employer’s liability, commercial general liability, owned and non -owned and hired automobile liability insurance coverage relating to VENDOR’s services to be performed hereunder covering CITY’s risks in form subject to the approval of the City Attorney and/or CITY’s Risk Manager. The minimum amounts of coverage corresponding to the aforesaid categories of insurance per insurable event shall be as follows:

Insurance Category Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation statutory minimum
Employer’s Liability $ 1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease
Commercial General $ 1,000,000 per occurrence and
Liability $ 2,000,000 aggregate for bodily
injury, personal injury and
property damage
Automobile Liability $ 1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage
coverage required to the extent
applicable to
VENDOR’s vehicle usage in
performing services hereunder)
It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the CITY as an Additional Insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of either (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
153
5 in this Agreement or ( 2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured.

VENDOR agrees to include with all subcontractors in their subcontracts the same requirements and provisions of this agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’ s work. Subcontractors hired by VENDOR shall agree to be bound to VENDOR and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as VENDOR is bound to CITY under this Agreement and its accompanying documents. Subcontractors shall further agree to include these same provisions with any sub-subcontractors. A copy of the indemnity and insurance provisions of this Agreement will be furnished to the Subcontractor upon request. VENDOR shall require all subcontractors to provide a valid certificate of insurance and the required endorsements included in the subcontract agreement and will provide proof of compliance to the CITY prior to commencement of any work by the subcontractor.

Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, VENDOR shall, on the Insurance Coverage form provided in Exhibit D, or equivalent, furnish CITY with certificates and copies of all declaration and endorsement pages for the insurance policy or policies required hereunder. With respect to commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance coverage, VENDOR must obtain and provide the following original endorsements:
a) Precluding cancellation or reduction in per occurrence limits before the expiration of thirty (30) days (10 days for nonpayment) after CITY shall have received written notification of cancellation in coverage or reduction in per occurrence limits by first class mail; b) Naming the CITY and Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, officers, boards, commissions, employees, and agents, as additional insureds; and
c) Providing the additional insured coverage under VENDOR’s insurance policy shall be primary and non-contributory insurance with respect to CITY and Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, officers, boards, commissions, employees, and agents, and any insurance or self -insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its Council, officers, boards, commissions, employees, or agents shall be in excess of VENDOR’s insurance and not contributory with it.

VENDOR and its insurer may not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance.

The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
154
6 excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non -contributory basis for the benefit of CITY, to the extent required by this Agreement, before the CITY’s insurance or self-insurance may be called upon to protect CITY as a named Insured.

All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to CITY for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability coverage. Policies containing and SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named VENDOR/Named Insured or CITY.

CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Any and all Subcontractors shall agree to be bound to VENDOR and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as VENDOR is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Subcontractors shall further agree to include the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, in any agreement with sub - subcontractors to the extent that they apply to the scope of the subsubcontractor’ s work. A copy of the indemnity and insurance provisions of this Agreement shall be furnished to any subcontractor upon request.

VENDOR shall maintain insurance as required by this Agreement to the fullest amount allowed by law and shall maintain insurance for a minimum of five (5) years following completion of this project or service. In the event VENDOR fails to obtain or maintain completed operations coverage as required by this Agreement, the CITY at its sole discretion may purchase the coverage required and the cost will be paid by VENDOR.

12. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. VENDOR certifies that he is aware of the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and VENDOR certifies that he will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this agreement.

13. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The VENDOR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The VENDOR will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and the employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, advancement, demotion, transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
155
7 selection for training, including apprenticeship. The VENDOR shall at all times be in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Americans With Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities. The VENDOR agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

14. Notice. All notices required by this Agreement shall be given to the CITY and VENDOR in writing, by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY: City of Foster City
610 Foster City Boulevard
Foster City, CA 94404-2299
Attention: Building and Vehicle Maintenance Manager Kurt Zander VENDOR: Name Thermal Mechanical
Address 425 Aldo Avenue
City, State, Zip Santa Clara, Ca 95054
Attention: Wayne Shipley
Email Address:wshipley@thermalmech. com

15. Non-Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable either in whole or in part.

16. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written agreement signed by both parties.

17. Validity. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.

18. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any suit or action initiated by either party shall be brought in the County of San Mateo, California. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto to enforce any provision of the Agreement, the unsuccessful party will pay the reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation of the successful party.

19. Mediation. Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, the parties shall meet in mediation and attempt to reach a resolution with the assistance of a mutually acceptable mediator. Neither party shall be permitted to file legal action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated resolution. The costs of the mediator, if any, shall be paid equally by the parties. If a mediated settlement is reached neither party shall be deemed the prevailing party for purposes of the settlement and each party shall bear its own legal costs.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
156
8 20. Conflict of Interest. VENDOR may serve other clients, but none who are active within the City of Foster City or who conduct business that would place VENDOR in a "conflict of interest" as that term is defined in State law.

21. Reliance on Professional Skill of VENDOR. VENDOR represents that it has the necessary professional skills to perform the services required and the CITY shall rely on such skills of the VENDOR to do and perform the work.

In performing services hereunder VENDOR shall adhere to the standards generally prevailing for the performance services similar to those to be performed by VENDOR hereunder.

22. PREVAILING WAGES. The services to be performed, and specifically repair services, include public works within the meaning of Labor Code Sections 1720 through 1861, and VENDOR must comply with state laws pertaining to prevailing wage and labor requirements, as more fully described in Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated in this Agreement by reference.

21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including Exhibits A, B C, D, and E, comprises the entire Agreement.

Signatures on Next Page]
Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
157
9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first above written by their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf.

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
Dated: _________________________________
Patrick Sullivan, Mayor
ATTEST:

Dated: ________________________________
Priscilla Schaus, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Dated:

Benjamin Stock, City Attorney
VENDOR
Dated:

David Rood, President
Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 12/ 2/ 2024 | 3: 05 PM PST
12/ 2/ 2024 | 5: 03 PM PST
12/ 3/ 2024 | 6: 59 AM PST
12/ 3/ 2024 | 9: 37 AM PST

5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc. 158
10 EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK and SCHEDULE
FOR

ANNUAL HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM

PROGRAMMED MAINTENANCE AND SYSTEM REPAIR
Locations to Be Serviced:

Location Name Address An
n
u
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Fr e
q
u
e
n
c
y
HV
A
C
U
n
i
t
s
Bo
i
l
e
r
U
n
i
t
s
Ex
h
a
u
s
t
F
a
n
Un
i
t
s
Controls Annual Maintenance All Buildings 1x NA NA NA
Police Station 1030 E. Hillsdale Bl. 4x 17 0 4
Council Chambers 620 Foster City Bl. 3x 10 0 2
City Hall 610 Foster City Bl. 4x 6 2 6
Library/Community Center 1000 Shell Bl. 4x 2 1 3
Corporation Yard 100 Lincoln Centre Dr. 4x 2 1 5
Teen Center 670 Shell Bl. 3x 4 0 4
Service may not be required depending upon the building demolition and construction schedule PART A: PROGRAMMED MAINTENANCE TASKS

PACKAGE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS & HEAT PUMPS

1. Lubricate fan bearings per manufacturer’s recommendation.

2. Check belts and sheaves, adjust as required.

3. Check coils for leaks.

4. Lubricate dampers and linkages.

5. Check drain pan and drains.

6. Inspect filters and change quarterly.

7. Check motor operating conditions.

8. Inspect electrical connections, contactors, relays, and operation/safety controls.

9. Check compressor oil level if accessible.

10. Check crankcase heater operation.

11. Start compressor. Check operation conditions.

12. Secure unit panels and inspect roof curb flashing.

13. Inspect temperature, safety and operational controls.

14. Check burner section for cleanliness and proper operation if applicable.

15. Check reversing valve operation if applicable.

16. Boiler Maintenance bi-annually
CONDENSING UNITS — AIR COOLED

1. Review manufacturer's recommendation for start-up.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
159
11 2. Energize crank case heater per manufacturer's recommendation for warm -up.

3. Visually inspect for leaks.

4. Vent system of trapped air.

5. Inspect electrical connections, contactors, relays, and operating/safety controls.

6. Check compressor oil level.

7. Check and test all operation controls.

8. Check operation conditions.

FAN COIL UNITS

1. Inspect motor.

2. Lubricate fan bearings

3. Inspect coil(s) for leak dependent on accessibility.

4. Inspect drain pan and trap.

5. Inspect belt and adjust tension.

6. Test operation unit internal on-off switch.

7. Clean or change filters per schedule.

8. Check condensate pump.

BOILERS

1. Inspect fireside of boiler and record condition.

2. Brush soot and dirt from flues and combustion chamber.

3. Inspect firebrick and refractory.

4. Visually inspect boiler pressure vessel for possible leaks and record condition.

5. Inspect low-water cutoff, manifolds and tubes. Clean as necessary.

6. Check hand valves and automatic feed equipment.

7. Inspect burner, flame detector and combustion air equipment.

8. Check fuel piping for leaks and proper support.

9. Check burner sequence or operation and combustion air equipment.

10. Check fuel supply.

11. Check auxiliary equipment operation.

12. Inspect burner, boiler and controls prior to start-up.

13. Start burner, check operation controls.

14. Check compressor unit.

15. Inspect spark igniter and replaced as scheduled.

16. Inspect and clean manifolds and tubes as necessary.

17. Test safety controls.

EXHAUST FAN UNITS

1. Inspect fan belts for wear and tension.

2. Check shaft bearing lubrication.

3. Remove exterior dust build-up on motor housing to ensure proper motor cooling.

4. Inspect electrical connections and operation/safety controls.

5. Check motor operation conditions.

BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM
Up to FOUR scheduled EIGHT-hour visits per year to accomplish the following:

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
160
12 1. Software maintenance, file maintenance and backups (on-site) and system optimization.

2. Investigation of reported problems from trouble log.

3. Control sequence evaluation, modification and enhancement.

4. Historical log review.

5. Field sensor verification and calibration spot checks.

6. Hardware communication tests and functional verification.

7. Control program and loop evaluation, modification and enhancement.

8. Hours of service: VENDOR shall be available for extra calls on a daily basis, five days per week, Monday through Friday. Standard hours are 7:00 am to 4:00 pm Monday through Friday.

9. Response time to an after-hours request must be within four hours.

Programmed Maintenance Project Schedule: As shown in chart above.

PART B: SYSTEM REPAIR
As authorized by the City, perform repairs and preventative maintenance not covered in Part A of the Scope of work on existing whole system components, encompassing all system parts from package units to vents, as needed and authorized by City staff by written Task Order. Examples may include but are not limited to repair of leaks, replacement of failed parts, electrical issues, mechanical failures, valve replacement.

Under no circumstances shall any single repair under this Agreement exceed a total cost, including time and materials, of $60,000, or $75,000, as may be approved by the Council after January 1, 2025.

System Repair Project Schedule: As needed and as requested by City Staff.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
161
13 EXHIBIT B
VENDOR’S FEES and PAYMENT MILESTONES
Summary
Annual Programmed Maintenance Contract
Services (Not to exceed amount):
28,277.00
System Repair Contract Services: As authorized by City based on time and materials at hourly rates
below not to exceed the sum
150,000 (one hundred fifty
thousand dollars) annually
Annual Increases
After the first calendar year of the Term of the Agreement, and after each subsequent year, including extensions pursuant to Section 2 of the Agreement, the not -to-exceed compensation paid to VENDOR for Programmed Maintenance shall increase 2.6%.

Itemized Fees
In addition to routine and preventative maintenance, VENDOR shall utilize the Hourly Labor and materials rate for unforeseen repairs to the system up to the City Manager’s, or their designee’s signing authority, which is currently $60,000, but may be increased by the City to $75,000 as of January 1, 2025.

Project Payment Schedule
Milestone
For Programmed Maintenance: Upon billing for service at rates based upon proposal; separate bills for each building and each service
For System Repair: Upon billing for service at time and materials cost at rates shown below. Invoices shall specify the building location of the work and specify work undertaken, number of hours, hourly rate for all personnel, materials used and cost for materials. The cost of materials shall be paid by the City upon documentation of such costs, plus Vendor’s markup of 20%.

Hourly Labor Rates for System Repair/Preventative Maintenance of Existing Equipment Days of Week/Time
of Day
Rate Per Hour
Journeyman
Annual Increase
to Rate
Standard Rate Monday-Friday $ 198.00 % 2.6
Overtime Rate Monday-Sunday $ 277.20 % 2.6
Holiday Rate $ 277.20 % 2.6
Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
162
14 EXHIBIT C
ADDITIONAL TERMS and CONDITIONS

1. VENDOR MUST BE A DELTA DIGITAL CONTROLS DISTRIBUTOR or provide Delta parts pricing and controls service staff info with proposal.

2. Service representative must check in with City Staff when on -site for scheduled service.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
163
15 EXHIBIT D

INSURANCE
VENDOR shall provide, in addition to the Certificates of Insurance, original Endorsement affecting the coverages specified in herein on the attached form. No substitute form will be accepted.

This is an Exhibit to, and made a part of and incorporated by reference to the Agreement dated Date of Agreement, by and between Thermal Mechanical, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Vendor”, and the City of Foster City, hereinafter referred to as "City", providing for professional services.

1. Vendor' s Duty to Show Proof of Insurance. Vendor, in order to protect City and its Council members, officials, agents, officers, and employees against all claims and liability for death, injury, loss and damage as a result of Vendor's acts, errors, or omissions in connection with the performance of Vendor's obligations, as required in this Agreement, shall secure and maintain insurance as described below. Vendor shall not perform any work under this Agreement until Vendor has obtained all insurance required under this section and the required certificates of insurance and all required endorsements have been filed with the City's authorized insurance representative, insurance Tracking Services Inc. (ITS). Receipt of evidence of insurance that does not comply with all applicable insurance requirements shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements set forth herein. The required documents must be signed by the authorized representative of the insurance company shown on the certificate. Upon request, Vendor shall supply proof that such person is an authorized representative thereof, and is authorized to bind the named underwriter( s) and their company to the coverage, limits and termination provisions shown thereon, Vendor shall promptly deliver to ITS a certificate of insurance, and all required endorsements, with respect to each renewal policy, as necessary to demonstrate the maintenance of the required insurance coverage for the term specified herein. Such certificates and endorsements shall be delivered to ITS prior to the expiration date of any policy and bear a notation evidencing payment of the premium thereof if so requested. Vendor shall immediately pay any deductibles and self-insured retentions under all required insurance policies upon the submission of any claim by Vendor or City as an additional insured.

1.1 Insurance Requirements
Commercial General Liability Insurance
Commercial General Liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Contractual Liability Insurance specifically concerning the indemnity provisions of this Agreement with the City ), ProductsCompleted Operations Hazard, liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy arising out of professional services rendered hereunder, Personal Injury (including bodily injury and death), and Property Damage for liability arising out of Vendor's performance of services under this Agreement.

The Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain no exclusions or limitation for independent contractors working on the behalf of the named insured. Vendor shall maintain the ProductsCompleted Operations Hazard coverage for the longest period allowed by law following termination of this Agreement. The amount of said insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be the policy limits, which shall be at least two million dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence and four million dollars ($4,000,000) aggregate.

Please note, the City will require a separate additional insured endorsement for the Commercial General Liability policy, listing the “City of Foster City, its Council members, officials, agents, officers, and employees”.

Business Automobile Liability Insurance
Automobile Liability Insurance against claims of Personal Injury (including bodily injury and death) and Property Damage covering any vehicle and/or all owned, leased, hired and non-owned vehicles used in the performance of Services pursuant to this Agreement with coverage equal to the policy limits, which shall be at least two million dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
164
16 Workers' Compensation Insurance
VENDOR shall submit written proof that VENDOR is insured against liability for workers' compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 3700 of the California Labor Code. VENDOR shall require any Subcontractors to provide workers' compensation for all of the Subcontractors' employees, unless the Subcontractors' employees are covered by the insurance afforded by VENDOR. If any class of employees engaged in work or services performed under this Agreement is not covered by California Labor Code section 3700, VENDOR shall provide and/or require each Subcontractor to provide adequate insurance for the coverage of employees not otherwise covered. Vendor shall also maintain employer' s liability insurance with limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily injury or disease.

Professional Liability Insurance
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, for liability arising out of, or in connection with, all negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with services tobe provided under this Agreement, with no exclusion for claims of one insured against another insured, with coverage equal to the policy limits, which shall not be less than five million dollars ($5,000,000) per occurrence and five million dollars ($5,000,000) aggregate.

Installation Floater
Installation Floater, covering the work performed under this Contract, against all risks of direct physical loss. The policy shall cover the Contractor’ s labor, materials and equipment, including materials and equipment in transit or away from the project site, to be installed in the existing structure(s). The coverage shall be written for an amount equal to the initial contract amount plus the value of any subsequent change orders, subject to a deductible of not more than [$10,000] payable by Contractor.

Cyber Liability Insurance
Cyber Liability Insurance, covering network risk and cyber liability (including coverage for unauthorized access, failure of security, breach of privacy perils, as well at notification costs and regulatory defense) in an amount of not less than $1,000,000. Such insurance shall be maintained in force at all times during the term of the Contract and for a period of two years thereafter for services completed during the term of the Contract.

1.2 Self-Insured Retention
Any self-insured retentions in excess of $100,000 must be declared on the Certificate of insurance or other documentation provided to City and must be approved by the City Risk Manager.

1.3 Claims-Made Basis Coverage
If any of the insurance coverages required under this Agreement is written on a claims-made basis, Vendor, at Vendor's option, shall either (i) maintain said coverage for at least five (5) years following the termination of this Agreement with coverage extending back to the effective date of this Agreement; ( ii) purchase an extended reporting period of not less than five (5) years following the termination of this Agreement; or (iii) acquire a full prior acts provision on any renewal or replacement policy.

2. City as Additional Insured
On Vendor's Commercial General Liability and Automobile policies, the City, its Council members, officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional insured's, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured. Any endorsement shall be provided using one of the following three options: (i) on ISO form CG 20 10 1 1 85; or (ii) on ISO form Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
165
17 CG 20 37 10 01 plus either ISO form CG 20 10 10 01 or CG 20 33 10 01; or (iii) on such other forms which provide coverage at least equal to or better than form CG 20 10 1 1 85.

3. Insurance terms and conditions:

3.1 Cancellation of Insurance
The above stated insurance coverages required to be maintained by Vendor shall be maintained until the completion of all of Vendor's obligations under this Agreement except as otherwise indicated herein.

Each insurance policy supplied by Vendor shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after ten (10) days written notice by Vendor in the case of non-payment of premiums, or thirty (30) days written notice in all other cases. This notice requirement does not waive the insurance requirements stated herein. Vendor shall immediately obtain replacement coverage for any insurance policy that is terminated, canceled, non-renewed, or whose policy limits have been exhausted or upon insolvency of the insurer that issued the policy.

3.2 All insurance shall be issued by a company or companies admitted to do business in California and listed in the current " Best's Key Rating Guide" publication with a minimum rating of A-; VII Any exception to these requirements must be approved by the City Risk Manager.

3.3 If Vendor is, or becomes during the term of this Agreement, self -insured or a member of a selfinsurance pool, Vendor shall provide coverage equivalent to the insurance coverages and endorsements required above. The City will not accept such coverage unless the City determines, inits sole discretion and by written acceptance, that the coverage proposed to be provided by Vendor is equivalent to the above-required coverages.

3.4 For any claims related to the Agreement, the Vendor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City , its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City , its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Vendor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3.5 Insurance coverages in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Vendor for any liability, whether within, outside, or inexcess of such coverage, andregardless of solvency or insolvency of the insurer that issues thecoverage; nor shall it preclude the City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provision of this Agreement or otherwise in law.

3.6 Failure by Vendor to maintain all such insurance in effect at all times required by this Agreement shall be a material breach of this Agreement by Vendor. City , at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from Vendor resulting from said breach. Alternatively, City may purchase such required insurance coverage, and without further notice to Vendor, City shall deduct from sums due to Vendor any premiums and associated costs advanced or paid by City for such insurance.

If the balance of monies obligated to Vendor pursuant to this Agreement are insufficient to reimburse City for the premiums and any associated costs, Vendor agrees to reimburse City for the premiums and pay for all costs associated with the purchase of said insurance. Any failure by City to take this alternative action shall not relieve Vendor of its obligation to obtain and maintain the insurance coverages required by this Agreement.

3.7 Should any of the required insurance ( other than errors and omissions insurance) be provided under a form of coverage that includes a general annual aggregate limit or provides that claims investigation or legal defenses costs be included in such general aggregate limit, such general annual aggregate limit shall be double the occurrence or claims limit specified above.

3.8 City may (but is under no obligation to) secure project-specific insurance, wrap-up insurance, or administer anowner controlled insurance program ("OCIP"), in which case Vendor and its subcontractors shall communicate this fact to their insurance carriers and request that the risk of this project be excluded from their practice policies. Vendor's fees under this Agreement (and the fee of its subcontractors under Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
166
18 subcontractor agreements) shall be reduced by the amount of insurance premiums that may be avoided by Vendor and its subcontractors by virtue of the City's obtaining the project-specific insurance, wrap-up insurance or administering an OCIP, and the exclusion of this project from coverage of Vendor's and subcontractors policies. Construction Manager and its subcontractors shall afford City access to their books and records and cooperate with City in verifying the amount of savings realized.

ATTACHED

1. Insurance Coverage Form
Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
167
19 EXHIBIT D
This INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM modifies or documents insurance provided under the following:

Named Insured: Effective Work Date(s):

Description of Work/Locations/Vehicles:

ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Foster City/Estero Municipal Improvement District (CITY) 610 Foster City Boulevard, Foster City, CA 94404
Attention: _________________________________, Contract Administrator Endorsement and Certificates of Insurance Required
The Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (Check all that apply)
Insurer Policy
No.

General Liability: ( a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, ( b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, ( c) premises owned, leased occupied or used by the Named Insured, and/or (d) permits issued for operations performed by the Named Insured. { Note:

MEETS OR EXCEEDS ISO Form # CG 20 10 11 85}
Auto Liability: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Other:

Certificates of Insurance Required (no endorsement needed) (Check all that apply) Insurer Policy No.

Workers Compensation: work performed by employees of the Named Insured while those employees are engaged in work under the simultaneous directions and control of the Named Insured and the Additional Insured.

Professional Liability:

PRIMARY/ NON-CONTRIBUTORY: This insurance is primary and is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of Additional Insureds.

SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST: The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limit of liability.

PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED' S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS: Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, emp loyees, or volunteers.

CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty ( 30) days' prior written notice ( ten ( 10) days if canceled due to non -payment) by regular mail return receipt requested has been given to the Additional Insured. Such notice shall be addressed as shown above.

WAIVER OF SUBROGATION: The insurer(s) named above agree to waive all rights of subro gation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the CITY.

Nothing herein contained shall vary, alter or extend any provision or condition of the Policy other than as above stated.

SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER I, ___________________________________________________________( print/type name), warrant that I have authority to bind the above-named insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ( original signature required) ORGANIZATION: TITLE:

ADDRESS:

TELEPHONE: ( ) DATE ISSUED:

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
168
20 Exhibit E

LABOR CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS

1. Public Works Project/ Prevailing Wage. The work to be performed under this Agreement is for “Public Works” within the meaning of Labor Code Sections 1720 to 1861. CONTRACTOR must therefore comply with state prevailing wage and labor law California Labor Code Sections 1720 to 1780, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, commencing with Section 16000) for work performed under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR’ s obligations under prevailing wage and labor compliance laws include, among other things, to: pay at least the applicable prevailing wage and travel and subsistence payments for public works activities performed under this Agreement; comply with overtime and working hour requirements; comply with apprenticeship obligations; comply with payroll recordkeeping requirements; and comply with other obligations as required by law. Copies of the applicable prevailing wage rates are on file with the CITY’s Project Manager, and shall be made available to any interested party upon request. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that the above requirements are included in all its contracts and any lower tier subcontracts for activities for the Project.

2. Registration with Department of Industrial Relations. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

CONTRACTOR must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations under Labor Code section 1725.5 when bidding and throughout performance of this agreement.

3. Wage Rates.
3(A). It shall be mandatory upon CONTRACTOR and upon any subcontractor to pay not less than the specified rates to all laborers, workers, and mechanics employed in the execution of the Contract. It is further expressly stipulated that CONTRACTOR shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit two hundred dollars 200.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement by CONTRACTOR or by any subcontractor; and CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all provisions of Section 1775 of the Labor Code.
3(B). The CITY will not recognize any claim for additional compensation because of the payment by the CONTRACTOR of any wage rate in excess of the prevailing wage rate set forth in the Agreement. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the CONTRACTOR in determining its bid, and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against the CITY on the Agreement.

4. Payroll Records. The CONTRACTOR and each subcontractor must comply with Labor Code Section 1776 and all requirements of contractors stated therein for the maintenance, inspection and certification of payroll records. The CONTRACTOR and Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
169
21 each subcontractor who fails to timely furnish payroll records or make the records available for inspection will forfeit to the CITY the penalty for non-compliance set forth in Labor Code Section 1776 for their respective failure.

5. Discrimination. The CONTRACTOR and each subcontractor must comply with the anti-discrimination requirements of Labor Code Section 1777.6.

Docusign Envelope ID: 135DA0C1- 1792-4507-A884-4CA4358915A2 5.7 Attachment 3 - Agreement with Thermal Mechanical, Inc.
170
DATE: July 20, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
Justin Lai, Senior Civil Engineer
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR $35,000.00 WITH APEX TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. FOR ADDITIONAL TESTING

AND INSPECTION SERVICES ON THE FOSTER CITY
COMMUNITY CENTER REBUILD PROJECT (CIP301-678)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing: (1) The City Manager to execute the attached Contract Amendment No. 2 with Apex Testing and Laboratories, Inc. (Apex) in the amount not-to-exceed $35,000 to provide additional testing and inspection services on the Foster City Community Center Rebuild Project (Project) (CIP 301-678).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommend that the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 2 with Apex in the amount of $35,000 for final material testing and inspection services on the Project, bringing the total contract to $406,520. Apex provides critical quality assurance for the building, and their scope was expanded to include essential building waterproofing.

The fiscal impact of this amendment is $35,000, and sufficient funds are already available within the project budget (Account No. 301-0910-678-4251), as waterproofing costs were previously budgeted. Approval of this amendment will ensure Apex can complete all remaining inspections and successfully bring the Community Center to final project closeout.

5.8 Staff Report
171

BACKGROUND
On September 3, 2024, the City Council approved the request to award the construction of the Community Center Rebuild Project to BHM Construction LLC., along with executing a contract to Apex for testing and inspection services. Apex’s contract amount was $341,520 with a contingency of $30,000. Authority was given to the City Manager to execute contract amendments up to the contingency amount.

On April 15, 2026, Amendment No. One (1) was issued for $30,000 to add additional testing and inspection services.

ANALYSIS
Apex provides the majority of material testing and inspection services for the project, which are critical for quality assurance. When the contract was initially awarded, the construction management team anticipated that the baseline funding would likely be exhausted due to the rigorous inspection schedule required to ensure a high-quality build.

During construction, staff added specialized waterproof testing to Apex’s scope of work to ensure the building was properly sealed. Because waterproof testing was already accounted for in the overall project budget, those allocated funds will directly cover the cost of this amendment. While the initial contract contingency was known to be insufficient for the full duration of the project, this phased amendment allowed staff to accurately assess and project the exact remaining funds needed for completion.

The project is now in its final stages. Staff recommend approving Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $35,000. This approval will ensure Apex can complete all remaining testing and inspections, successfully bringing the project to final closeout.

CEQA
In July 2023, the City of Foster City, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by the Secretary of Resources, and the City of Foster City Environmental Review Guidelines, prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH # 20231009) with Standards Conditions and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (SCAMMRP), and CEQA Findings (IS/MND) for the Recreation Center Rebuild Project.

On November 16, 2023, the City Planning Commission adopted the IS/MND and approved the Use Permit for the Project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b), the City prepared an Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the temporary Modular Buildings portion of the work.

5.8 Staff Report
172

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of this resolution is $35,000 with funds available in the overall project budget, account number 301-0910-678-4251. Any unspent funds revert to the originating fund balance following the closeout of the project. With Contract Amendment No. 2 executed, the total contract agreement with Apex would be $406,520.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Contract Amendment No. 2

5.8 Staff Report
173
RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,000 WITH APEX TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. FOR

TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES ON THE FOSTER CITY COMMUNITY REBUILD PROJECT (CIP301-678)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, City Council adopted City Resolution No. 2024-92 on September 3, 2024, approving a task order agreement for material testing and inspection services with Apex Testing Laboratories, Inc. for $341,520 and a project contingency of $30,000; and WHEREAS, the original agreement scope did not include waterproof testing; and WHEREAS, the City Manager authorized Amendment No. 1 on April 20,2026 in the amount of $30,000; and
WHEREAS, funding is available in the project budget account number 301-0910- 678-4251 due to waterproof testing being budgeted for.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute contract amendment No. 2 with Apex Testing Laboratories, Inc. in the amount not-to-exceed $35,000 to provide testing and inspection services on the Foster City Community Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301- 678).

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Agreements, in the forms attached hereto, with minor, non-substantive revisions that may be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney, and to execute any other necessary documents to effectuate the terms of the Agreement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 20th day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.8 Attachment 1 - Resolution
174

ORIGINAL

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2)
TO TASK ORDER ATL-2024-01
DATE: July 20, 2026 ACCOUNT NO. 301-0910-678-4251
PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY CENTER REBUILD PROJECT FORMALLY KNOWN AS THE RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT (CIP301-
678)
TO: APEX TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.

CHANGE REQUESTED BY: APEX TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. AND CITY OF

FOSTER CITY
Based on mutual agreement, Apex Testing Laboratories, Inc. and City of Foster City agree to amend the original Agreement dated October 11, 2024 (“Agreement”) pursuant to Section 17 of the Agreement to increase the compensation amount identified in Section 3 and add additional services relating to the Project for specified amounts, to Exhibit A (Scope of Services) identified in the Agreement as follows:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 341,520
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1) $ 30,000
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2) $ 35,000
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 406,520
Additional work included in the contract amendment:

Task #1: Additional Testing and Inspection Services

1. Continue assisting with testing and inspection services for the Community Center Rebuild Project CIP678, which includes all tasks listed in the original contract and additional testing and inspection such as waterproof testing.
$ 35,000
Subtotal $ 35,000
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 406,520
Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and provisions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

5.8 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No. 2
175
Apex Testing Laboratories, Inc. have given careful consideration to the work proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, to provide all equipment, furnish all materials except as may otherwise be noted above, and to perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and to accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.

SUBMITTED BY:

JUSTIN LAI DATE

PROJECT MANAGER
ACCEPTED BY:

ABDELKADER KHEFIA, PRESIDENT DATE

APEX TESTING LABORATORIES, INC
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:

DEREK SCHWEIGART DATE

PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR CITY:

STEFAN CHATWIN DATE

CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:

BY:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ___________________________________
BENJAMIN L. STOCK, CITY ATTORNEY

5.8 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No. 2
176
DATE: July 20, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Board of Directors
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City/District Manager
FROM: Diane Pitman, Administrative Services Director
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
SUBJECT: UPDATED CITY/DISTRICT PAY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026- 2027 EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council/EMID Board of Directors (hereafter referred to as “City Council”) adopt resolutions approving the updated Pay Plan for Fiscal Years 2026-2027, effective July 1, 2026.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council approves a Pay Plan at a regularly scheduled meeting as part of the budget adoption process or amends the Pay Plan if there are changes during the fiscal year.

On May 5, 2025, the City Council approved the unrepresented employee’s compensation and benefits plan, effective May 1, 2025. Within the approved compensation and benefits plan, a general wage increase is provided effective on July 1, 2026. This wage increase is equal to the percentage movement of the San Francisco-Hayward-Oakland CPI-U April 2025 to April 2026, with a minimum of 3% and a maximum of 5%. The CPI-U percentage for April 2025 to April 2026 is 3.8%.

In addition, on June 1, 2026, the City Council approved the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the City and the Foster City Police Officers Association (FCPOA). Within the approved MOU, a general wage increase plus a market

5.9 Staff Report
177
adjustment is provided effective July 1, 2026. This wage increase is equal to the percentage movement of the San Francisco-Hayward-Oakland CPI-U April 2025 to April 2026, with a minimum of 3% and a maximum of 5% plus a market adjustment. The CPI-U percentage for April 2025 to April 2026 is 3.8%. The market adjustments for the FCPOA classifications are:
• Police Dispatcher – 2.5%
• Lead Police Dispatcher – 2.5%
• Police Dispatcher Supervisor – 2.5%
• Police Officer – 5%
• Police Corporal – 5%
• Police Sergeant – 5%
The salary steps of the attached Pay Plan have updated salaries, increased by 3.8%, for all unrepresented employees.

The salary steps of the attached Pay Plan have updated salaries, increased by 3.8% plus market adjustments for all Foster City Police Officers Association employees.

To meet CalPERS requirements under Government Code 20636 and CCR section 570.5, which requires public agencies to provide a publicly available pay schedule, which is required to be duly approved and adopted by the Council, staff is bringing this forward to ensure the City's pay schedule is updated with the new pay rates based on the approved FCPOA MOU and unrepresented employees compensation and benefits plan. Staff requests approval of the resolutions to approve the amended Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 which will be effective July 1, 2026. Upon approval, staff will publish the updated Pay Plan on the City's website for public access on or near the effective date of this plan.

California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA General Rule Exemption

FISCAL IMPACT
The updated FY 2026-2027 Pay Plan reflects the approved salary ranges provided in the FCPOA MOU and unrepresented employees’ compensation and benefits plan. The FY 2026-2027 budget includes the 3.8% cost of living increase as well as the terms of the new FCPOA MOU.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Staff Empowerment and Operational Excellence

5.9 Staff Report
178
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – City Resolution
Attachment 2 – EMID Resolution
Attachment 3 – City/District Pay Plan for FY 2026-2027 Effective July 1, 2026 (redline) Attachment 4 – City/District Pay Plan for FY 2026-2027 Effective July 1, 2026

5.9 Staff Report
179
RESOLUTION NO. _____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED PAY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026- 2027, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2026

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and submitted to the City Council a schedule of pay ranges for job classifications for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; and WHEREAS, the schedule of pay ranges is referred to as the Pay Plan; and WHEREAS, the Pay Plan incorporates the negotiated salary increase for the classifications represented by Foster City Police Officer Association (FCPOA) labor unit and unrepresented management employees compensation and benefits plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Foster City must approve the Pay Plan in order for the pay ranges to become effective.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Foster City that the amended Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby adopted effective July 1, 2026.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the Regular Meeting held on the 20th day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

5.9 Attachment 1 - City Resolution
180
RESOLUTION NO. _____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ESTERO MUNICIPAL

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PAY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2026

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the District Manager has prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors a schedule of pay ranges for job classifications for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; and WHEREAS, the schedule of pay ranges is referred to as the Pay Plan; and WHEREAS, the Pay Plan incorporates the negotiated salary increase for the classifications represented by Foster City Police Officer Association (FCPOA) labor unit and unrepresented management employees compensation and benefits plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District must approve the Pay Plan in order for the pay ranges to become effective.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District that the amended Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby adopted effective July 1, 2026.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District at the Regular Meeting held on the 20th day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ART KIESEL, PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
______________________________________

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, DISTRICT SECRETARY

5.9 Attachment 2 - EMID Resolution
181
City of Foster City / Estero Municipal Improvement District FY 2025-2026 2026-2027 Pay Plan
Effective July 1, 20256
Exhibit A
Code Classification Unit FLSA Salary Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 229 Accountant I Other Management E Hourly $47.3245 $49.6907 $52.1752 $54.7840 $57.5232 $49.1229 $51.5790 $54.1579 $56.8658 $59.7091
Monthly $8,202.91 $8,613.05 $9,043.70 $9,495.89 $9,970.69 $8,514.64 $8,940.36 $9,387.37 $9,856.74 $10,349.57
Yearly $98,434.96 $103,356.66 $108,524.42 $113,950.72 $119,648.26 $102,175.63 $107,284.32 $112,648.43 $118,280.86 $124,194.89 923 Accountant II Other Management E Hourly $52.5805 $55.2095 $57.9700 $60.8685 $63.9119 $54.5786 $57.3075 $60.1729 $63.1815 $66.3406
Monthly $9,113.95 $9,569.65 $10,048.13 $10,550.54 $11,078.06 $9,460.29 $9,933.30 $10,429.97 $10,951.46 $11,499.03
Yearly $109,367.44 $114,835.76 $120,577.60 $126,606.48 $132,936.75 $113,523.49 $119,199.60 $125,159.63 $131,417.52 $137,988.35 516 Accounting Specialist AFSCME NE Hourly $37.8250 $39.7163 $41.7021 $43.7872 $45.9766 Monthly $6,556.33 $6,884.16 $7,228.36 $7,589.78 $7,969.28 Yearly $78,676.00 $82,609.90 $86,740.37 $91,077.38 $95,631.33 264 Administrative Assistant I AFSCME NE Hourly $39.1136 $41.0693 $43.1228 $45.2789 $47.5428 Monthly $6,779.69 $7,118.68 $7,474.62 $7,848.34 $8,240.75 Yearly $81,356.29 $85,424.14 $89,695.42 $94,180.11 $98,889.02 263 Administrative Assistant II AFSCME NE Hourly $43.1228 $45.2789 $47.5428 $49.9199 $52.4159 Monthly $7,474.62 $7,848.34 $8,240.75 $8,652.78 $9,085.42 Yearly $89,695.42 $94,180.11 $98,889.02 $103,833.39 $109,025.07 114 Administrative Services Director Executive Management E Hourly $108.6190 $114.0500 $119.7525 $125.7401 $132.0271 $112.7465 $118.3838 $124.3030 $130.5182 $137.0441
Monthly $18,827.29 $19,768.67 $20,757.10 $21,794.95 $22,884.70 $19,542.73 $20,519.86 $21,545.85 $22,623.15 $23,754.32
Yearly $225,927.52 $237,224.00 $249,085.20 $261,539.41 $274,616.37 $234,512.72 $246,238.30 $258,550.24 $271,477.86 $285,051.79 111 Assistant City Manager Executive Management E Hourly $121.2618 $127.3249 $133.6911 $140.3757 $147.3945 $125.8697 $132.1632 $138.7714 $145.7100 $152.9955
Monthly $21,018.71 $22,069.65 $23,173.12 $24,331.79 $25,548.38 $21,817.41 $22,908.29 $24,053.71 $25,256.40 $26,519.22
Yearly $252,224.54 $264,835.79 $278,077.49 $291,981.46 $306,580.56 $261,808.98 $274,899.46 $288,644.51 $303,076.80 $318,230.62 211 Assistant Engineer Other Management E Hourly $58.3810 $61.3000 $64.3650 $67.5833 $70.9625 $60.5995 $63.6295 $66.8110 $70.1515 $73.6591
Monthly $10,119.37 $10,625.33 $11,156.60 $11,714.44 $12,300.17 $10,503.91 $11,029.11 $11,580.57 $12,159.59 $12,767.57
Yearly $121,432.48 $127,504.00 $133,879.20 $140,573.26 $147,602.00 $126,046.96 $132,349.36 $138,966.88 $145,915.12 $153,210.88 225 Assistant Finance Director Other Management E Hourly $85.9297 $90.2262 $94.7375 $99.4744 $104.4481 $89.1950 $93.6548 $98.3375 $103.2544 $108.4171
Monthly $14,894.48 $15,639.21 $16,421.17 $17,242.23 $18,104.34 $15,460.47 $16,233.50 $17,045.17 $17,897.43 $18,792.30
Yearly $178,733.78 $187,670.50 $197,054.00 $206,906.75 $217,252.05 $185,525.60 $194,801.98 $204,542.00 $214,769.15 $225,507.63 220 Assistant Planner Other Management E Hourly $51.0417 $53.5938 $56.2735 $59.0872 $62.0416 $52.9814 $55.6305 $58.4120 $61.3326 $64.3992
Monthly $8,847.23 $9,289.59 $9,754.07 $10,241.78 $10,753.88 $9,183.44 $9,642.62 $10,124.75 $10,630.98 $11,162.52
Yearly $106,166.74 $111,475.10 $117,048.88 $122,901.38 $129,046.53 $110,201.31 $115,711.44 $121,496.96 $127,571.81 $133,950.30 207 Associate Civil Engineer Other Management E Hourly $64.8690 $68.1124 $71.5180 $75.0939 $78.8486 $67.3340 $70.7007 $74.2357 $77.9475 $81.8448
Monthly $11,243.96 $11,806.15 $12,396.45 $13,016.28 $13,667.09 $11,671.23 $12,254.79 $12,867.52 $13,510.90 $14,186.44
Yearly $134,927.52 $141,673.79 $148,757.44 $156,195.31 $164,005.09 $140,054.72 $147,057.46 $154,410.26 $162,130.80 $170,237.28 215 Associate Planner Other Management E Hourly $56.7154 $59.5512 $62.5288 $65.6552 $68.9380 $58.8707 $61.8142 $64.9049 $68.1501 $71.5576
Monthly $9,830.67 $10,322.21 $10,838.33 $11,380.23 $11,949.25 $10,204.25 $10,714.46 $11,250.18 $11,812.68 $12,403.32
Yearly $117,968.03 $123,866.50 $130,059.90 $136,562.82 $143,391.04 $122,451.06 $128,573.54 $135,002.19 $141,752.21 $148,839.90 507 Building Inspector AFSCME NE Hourly $53.0918 $55.7464 $58.5337 $61.4604 $64.5334 Monthly $9,202.58 $9,662.71 $10,145.84 $10,653.14 $11,185.79 Yearly $110,430.94 $115,952.51 $121,750.10 $127,837.63 $134,229.47 261 Building Lead Maintenance Worker AFSCME NE Hourly $44.2008 $46.4108 $48.7313 $51.1679 $53.7263 Monthly $7,661.47 $8,044.54 $8,446.76 $8,869.10 $9,312.56 Yearly $91,937.66 $96,534.46 $101,361.10 $106,429.23 $111,750.70

Page 1 of 7 ends

Foster City City CouncilJuly 20, 2026

Foster City City Council
July 20, 2026