Agenda — Fountain Valley City Council, February 20, 2024 (part 1 of 3)

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE FOUNTAIN

VALLEY AGENCY

FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/

FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Closed Session 4:00 p.m.

Study Session 4:30 p.m.

Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Council Chambers
10200 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
http://www.fountainvalley.org
MEETING ASSISTANCE: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, anyone needing special assistance to participate in a meeting of the government bodies listed herein should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 593-4445. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting allows the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting.

AGENDA COMMUNICATIONS: All revised or additional documents and writings related to an item on this agenda provided to all or a majority of the government body members after distribution of the agenda packet, are available for public inspection (1) in the City Clerk’s Office at 10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 during normal business hours; and (2) in the Council Chambers at the time of the meeting. Unless directed otherwise by a government body listed herein all actions shall be based on/memorialized by the latest document submitted as a late communication.

PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS: Persons wishing to address the City Council or other government body listed complete a speaker card and give it to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period. Requests to speak will not be accepted after the public comment session begins without permission of the Mayor/Chair. Speakers must limit remarks to a total of (3) three minutes and address the City Council through the Mayor. Comments to individuals or staff are not permitted. Scheduled Matters, including Public Hearings: Indicate on the card what item you want to address. Unscheduled Matters: Indicate on the card what subject matter you want to address. Comments must be related to issues that are within the jurisdiction of the governing body listed on the agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the governing body may not enter into discussion regarding items not on the agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the governing bodies listed herein to be routine and will be enacted on simultaneously with one motion without discussion unless separate action and/or discussion is requested by a governing body member, staff, or a member of the public.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: Persons wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to a proposal are given an opportunity to do so during the public hearing. Those wishing to address a governing body during the hearing are requested to complete the speaker card and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing. If a proposed action is challenged in court, there may be a limitation to raising only those issues raised during the hearing or in written correspondence received by the governing body at or before the hearing.

Note: The Fountain Valley City Council serves as the Successor Agency to the Fountain Valley Agency for Community Development (Successor Agency), the Fountain Valley Housing Authority, and the Fountain Valley Finance Authority. The Actions of the Successor Agency are separate and apart from the actions of the City Council.

ZOOM LINK INFORMATION
• Participants that choose to watch the City Council meeting through zoom are automatically placed in the waiting room and will only be allowed into the Zoom meeting if they request to make a public comment. In order to make a public comment, you will indicate through the chat feature which item you would like to speak on, and click on the “raise hand” icon to let the administrator know you wish to speak. • All participants are muted unless you are requesting to speak, at which time you will be allowed to unmute and make you comment.
• All public comments are allowed up to 3 minutes to speak.

Topic: City Council
Time: Feb 20, 2024 06:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87566037692?pwd=dk5DTGhpbWRYZ3RhdnBrTTg5Z3VzQT09 Meeting ID: 875 6603 7692
Passcode: 488637

CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 4:00 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Closed Session matters only)
Persons wishing to speak on a Closed Session matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card indicating the item they want to address and to give the card to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period.

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6.

Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager, Maggie Le, Finance Director, Ryan Smith, Human Resources Director, Carrie Hanes, Community Development Director / Deputy City Manager, Omar Dadabhoy, Attorney for the City, Colin Burns Employee Organizations: Police Officers' Association (POA), Police Officers' Management Unit (POMU), Fire Association (FVFA), Fountain Valley Municipal Employees Association (Field Services unit), Fountain Valley General Employees Association (FVGEA), Fountain Valley Professional and Technical Employees (P&T), Individually Represented Battalion Chiefs and Individually Represented P&T (IRP&T)

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 potential case)

STUDY SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 4:30 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Study Session matters only)
Persons wishing to speak on a Study Session matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card indicating the item they want to address and to give the card to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period.

1. Economic Development Plan Priorities – Presentation by Omar Dadabhoy, Community Development Director / Deputy City Manager

2. Best practice for a multi-year systematic approach to program and fund building maintenance needs for City facilities – Presentation by Scott Smith – Public Works Director

3. Public Notices Assessment – Presentation by Omar Dadabhoy, Community Development Director / Deputy City Manager

OPEN SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 p.m.

INVOCATION
SALUTE TO THE FLAG Council Member Patrick Harper

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY/ ROLL CALL Council Members: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Vice Mayor/Vice Chair Bui, Mayor/Chair Grandis

ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS

CITY MANAGER / MAYOR UPDATE

PRESENTATIONS
• Certificates of Recognition to the 2024 Miss Fountain Valley Winner Love Bradley and Her Court – Presentation by Mayor Grandis
• Presentation of Retirement Proclamations to Police Chaplains Tom Bjorquist and Wayne Wilson – Presentation by Mayor Grandis
• Presentation on Customer Service Survey – Presentation by Rob Frizzelle, Community Services Director
• Request for Support of AB 1805 – Presentation by Assemblyman Tri Ta

FIRST CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
The Unscheduled Matters Public Comments portion will last 15 Minutes at the beginning of the meeting. Any requests to speak on unscheduled matters after the initial 15 minutes, will be heard at the end of the meeting, unless the Mayor approves an extension of this time. If an individual speaks during the First unscheduled matters time period, they do not get to speak at the end of the meeting as well. Persons wishing to speak on an unscheduled matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card and to give the card to the City Clerk. Each person will have up to 3 minutes to speak. The City Clerk will call upon those that wish to speak.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Scheduled Matters Only)
Persons wishing to speak on Agenda item(s) are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card indicating the item they want to address and to give the card to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period. Each person will be given up to 3 minutes to speak on the entire Consent Calendar, 3 minutes to speak on each item pulled from the consent calendar, and 3 minutes to speak on any agendized item(s) not appearing on the Consent Calendar.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar Items 1 – 4 will be approved simultaneously with one motion, unless separate action/or discussion is requested.

1. Waive the reading in full of all ordinances under consideration and direct the Mayor to read by titles only.

2. Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the January 30, 2024 Adjourned Regular Meeting Page 6 3. City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Update for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024. Page 19

4. Approve the Register of Demands for the period of 1/20/2024 to 2/9/2024 Page 25 Recommended Action: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 to approve the attached Register of Demands representing payments made by the City of Fountain Valley between 1/20/2024 and 2/9/2024 for a total of $2,638,866.36.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Each person will have up to 3 minutes to speak on each Public Hearing.

5. Continued -- A Public Hearing regarding the adoption of a Resolution to establish an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee – Presentation by Omar Dadabhoy, Community Development Director / Deputy City Manager Page 42
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

6. Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project #24010 – Presentation by Ryan Damon, Assistant Engineer Page 76
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Accept the bids and award a construction contract to DASH Construction Company Inc. for the Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project #24010 in the amount not-to-exceed $2,786,449.50;

2. Accept the proposal and authorize Staff to issue a Purchase Order to Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants On-Call contract for Material Testing Services in the amount not-to-exceed $12,075.

3. Approve a Project Budget Amendment in the amount of $100,000.

7. Approve Construction Contract for Capital Improvements City of FV Sourcewell ezIQC Contract Horizons Construction Company Int’l for Sports Park Restroom Repairs for $151,359.16 & approve offsetting Budget Amendments of $128,027 to revenue & expense – Presentation by Scott Smith, Public Works Director Page 177 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the Construction Contract for Capital Improvements City of Fountain Valley Sourcewell ezIQC Contract Horizons Construction Company Int’l Inc. for the Fountain Valley Sports Park Restroom Repairs in the not-to-exceed amount of $151,359.16.

2. Approve the offsetting Budget Amendments of $128,027 to revenue and expense, as requested by the Finance Department.

8. Approve an agreement with Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP (RAMS) to perform professional audit services – Presentation by Ryan Smith, Finance Director Page 344 Recommended Action: Approve the Agreement with RAMS to Perform Professional Audit Services for Three (3) Fiscal Years Beginning with Fiscal Year 2023-24.

APPOINTMENTS

9. Committee, Commission and Board Appointments for 2024 – Presentation by Rick Miller, City Clerk

COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION

SECOND CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
Persons wishing to speak on an unscheduled matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker and to give the card to the City Clerk. Each person will have up to 3 minutes to speak. The City Clerk will call upon those that wish to speak.

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY AB 1234/GENERAL

COMMENTS

ADJOURN THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR

AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY
Tonight’s City Council Meeting is being Adjourned in the Memory of Chris Fowler The next Regular Meeting of the Fountain Valley City Council is March 5, 2024 at 6:00 p.m., in the Fountain Valley Council Chambers, 10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley.

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL MEMO
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: February 20, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Prioritization of Action Items Related to the Recently Adopted Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On July 18, 2023 staff presented a draft version of the City’s Economic Development Action Pan (EDAP) at a Study Session with the City Council and HdL Companies who prepared the plan. Based on the feedback received at the Study Session, the EDAP was updated and approved on November 7, 2023 by the City Council. Subsequenlty, as part of the City’s most recent Strategic Planning Session, Staff was directed to prepare a prioritized list of the Action Items contained within the EDAP.

DISCUSSION:

The EDAP contains a number of action items related to six focus areas and an Other Economic Development Activities category. The six focus areas are the Crossings, Shopping Centers, Mile Square Park, Restaurants and Night-Life Activity, Medical and Health Care, and City Hall Engagement. Based on the City Council’s request, Staff has reviewed all of the action items and prepared the attached prioritization list. The action items were separated into four categories which correspond to fiscal years. In addition to creating a prioritized list, this method will also allow for future budgets to reflect any funding that may be required for implementation.

Prepared By: Victor Viramontes, Management Analyst
Reviewed By: Omar Dadabhoy, Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Economic Development Action Plan

2. Recommended Action Item Prioritization
Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP) Action Items Priority Priority: Priority 1 Current FY, Priority 2 FY 2024/25, Priority 3 FY 2025/26, Priority 4 FY 2026/27 Page 1 Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics

1. The Crossings Create an inventory of existing businesses, as well as vacant and underutilized spaces, within the area to better evaluate the strengths of business mixes and potential for new business opportunities.

Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners/managers
-Percent total known businesses
included in inventory

2. Shopping Centers The city should verify the ownership and property managers for each of the centers and schedule one-on-one meetings with them.

Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners/property
managers
-Percent of total known
owners/managers verified
-Number of meetings with
owners/managers
The city should identify existing or pending vacancies with the centers Near-term (ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners/property
managers
-Percent of known vacant or
underutilized spaces identified
Participate in trade shows such as International Shopping Centers (ICSC) and the American Lodging Investment Summit (ALIS).

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners
-Filling vacant spaces with new
business attraction

3. Mile Square Park Work with hotels for package deals for people and event organizers who are staying in Fountain Valley for Sporting events at Mile Square Park.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, Hotels -Number of hotels providing
package deal -
Investment/deal provided by
hotels -Number of Mile
Square Park users who use the
hotel package(s)

4. Restaurants and NightLife Activity Build a restaurant and entertainment guide for visitors, Fountain Valley employees, and residents.

Short-term City, Park District,
Restaurants
-Number restaurants willing to
participate in a guide program
-Visits/clicks to online restaurant
guide
Explore the possibility of a Night Market such as La Puente and 626 Market. Longer-term (ongoing)
City, restaurants and
community
-Number of events & participation
at events by restaurants and
attendees
Priority 1 Action Items (Current FY)
Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP) Action Items Priority Priority: Priority 1 Current FY, Priority 2 FY 2024/25, Priority 3 FY 2025/26, Priority 4 FY 2026/27 Page 2 Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics

5. Medical and Health
Care
Identify complimentary uses and specific businesses to attract into the city to support the health care industry.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers, medical
and healthcare businesses
-Number of meetings held with
task force

6. City Hall Engagement Develop a toolkit for businesses outlining various available programs and incentives. Short-term City Staff -Creation of material -Regular review and maintenance of online
materials
Actively participate in industry organizations and community engagement to cultivate relationships with tenants, brokers, property owners and other real estate decision maker.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff, Local/regional
organizations, local
businesses, property
owners/managers
-Attendance at related meetings
Strengthen social media presence with active postings. Short-term (ongoing)
City Staff -Social media postings, following
and engagement

7. Other Economic
Development Activities
Tell the Fountain Valley story to better market business and/or development of opportunities in Fountain Valley.

Short-term City, local businesses,
property owner/managers,
real estate professionals
-Creation of story/branding for
City's Economic Development
Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics

1. The Crossings The city should continue to communicate with the property owners in person annually (and their real estate representatives) to understand their desire for potential for development and be aware of development opportunities that fit within the property owners and city's objectives.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, local businesses, local
property owners/managers
- Percent of vacant spaces
-Total vacancy rate
Given the existing mix of home furnishings businesses, one niche option to consider is new short-term branding and marketing opportunities to designate this as a Design + Home Furnishings District in support of existing businesses in the Crossings that fall within those categories.

1. The Crossings, 2. Shopping Centers, 3. Mile Square Park, 4. Restaurants and Night-Life Activity

5. Medical and Health Care, 6. City Hall Engagement, 7. Other Economic Development Activities Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP) Action Items Priority Priority: Priority 1 Current FY, Priority 2 FY 2024/25, Priority 3 FY 2025/26, Priority 4 FY 2026/27 Page 3 Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics The city should work with existing businesses to undertake a focused marketing campaign to market the businesses in the area to residents and outside the community consumers.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners/managers
-Creation of marketing campaign -
Percent businesses participating in
marketing campaign

3. Mile Square Park Analyze the restaurants that are within convenient driving distance from the park.

Consider whether there are any voids in types of restaurants that would cater to families Longer-term City, restaurants -Number of restaurant voids filled (if voids exist)
Create hotel and restaurant guides for visitors and event organizers who come to Fountain Valley for sporting or other events held at Mile Square Park on the food and over-night stay options within the city limits. Create a few "templates" for one-day or multi-day visits to Fountain Valley geared towards families or other key users of the Mile Square Park.

Short-term City, Hotels, Restaurants -Number hotels and restaurants willing to participate in a guide
program -Visits to
online hotel and restaurant guide

4. Restaurants and NightLife Activity Identify and actively seek unique restauranteurs or developers willing to come to Fountain Valley and add value, as well as improve aesthetics of existing shopping centers or strip malls.

Longer-term City, property
owners/managers,
restaurants/businesses
-Private investment to improve
restaurant facades
Develop a brand and logo for Fountain Valley restaurants, as well as a tagline for Fountain Valley restaurants as a destination. Consider co-branding with Kei Concepts, the owner of several restaurants in Fountain Valley, and tie in existing themes of local Fountain Valley restaurants.

Near-term City, restaurants -Creation of brand and logo -Creation of restaurant destination
tagline

5. Medical and Health
Care
Work with Local brokers and property owners to encourage the attraction of medical/healthcare related business.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers, medical
and healthcare businesses
-Relationships built with brokers
and property owners/managers
Identify spaces available to meet the needs of medical related complimentary uses. Longer-term (ongoing)
City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers, medical
and healthcare businesses
-Percent of known vacant or
underutilized spaces identified
Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP) Action Items Priority Priority: Priority 1 Current FY, Priority 2 FY 2024/25, Priority 3 FY 2025/26, Priority 4 FY 2026/27 Page 4 Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics Create restaurant and hotel guide for employees and families of hospital patients. Short-term City, local brokers, property
owners/managers, medical
and healthcare businesses
-Healthcare and medical facility byin -Number of guides distributed and referenced at restaurants and
hotel

6. City Hall Engagement Develop a Business Concierge Service wherein businesses receive one-on-one assistance to navigate through the city's permitting, entitlement and development process.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff
Feature business successes, new openings, and entrepreneurs. Short-term (ongoing)
City Staff, local businesses -Number of businesses featured per quarter

7. Other Economic
Development Activities
Form a 'Team Fountain Valley' comprised of key city staff to help support existing Fountain Valley businesses as well as quickly advance new development opportunities in Fountain Valley, including having an ombudsman or concierge program.

Near-term City -Defining roles for development
ombudsman or concierge program
roles and assigning staff
Work with leading businesses and business stakeholders in the community in the formulation of a new Shop Local marketing program to assist independently owned small businesses in Fountain Valley.

Near-term City, businesses
Constantly seek quality development for Fountain Valley that creates a strong sense of place or placemaking through consistent design standards, amenities, and effective public spaces.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Quality development
opportunities/leads -Number
of quality development leads that
come to fruition
Creation of an Economic Development Tourism Advisory Group consisting of City Staff, as well as business and Chamber leaders.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, leisure industry and
other businesses, Chamber
-Number of meetings held with
Advisory Group -
Follow through on recommended
Action Items from the Group
Conduct a survey of the small business community on identifying barriers to business growth, along with soliciting ways to enhance the business climate in Fountain Valley.

Short-term City, local businesses -Number total responses to survey Create a business visitation program for Fountain Valley, where key city staff visit businesses monthly to engage in fact finding about needs and wants of local businesses.

Short-term City, local businesses -Number businesses visited per quarter
Priority 3 Action Items (FY 2025/26)

1. The Crossings, 2. Shopping Centers, 3. Mile Square Park, 4. Restaurants and Night-Life Activity

5. Medical and Health Care, 6. City Hall Engagement, 7. Other Economic Development Activities Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP) Action Items Priority Priority: Priority 1 Current FY, Priority 2 FY 2024/25, Priority 3 FY 2025/26, Priority 4 FY 2026/27 Page 5 Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics

1. The Crossings The Specific Plan defines the geographic boundaries; however, the city should consider clearly identifying commercial boundaries within the area to help market and identify existing and future business and development opportunities more easily.

Short-term City, local property
owners/managers
-Completion of commercial
boundary identification
The city should identify existing uses that may not be the highest and best use of the property or buildings. If there are uses that appear to be underutilized, work with the property owners to potentially redevelop those properties.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners/property
managers
-Number of properties identified
Assist property owners in marketing the centers and specific businesses Longer-term (ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners/property
managers
-Increase in business customer
activity

2. Shopping Centers Work with the property owners on strategies to assist with aesthetic improvements to the centers. Consider programs to waive city fees or pay overtime.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property owners
-Investment in existing properties

3. Mile Square Park Evaluate pedestrian and bicycle connectivity between Mile Square Park and major retail areas in Fountain Valley to determine opportunities for improvements, such as adding bike lanes or crosswalks, or making improvements for overall safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular drivers.

Short-term City, park users -Investment in improving
connectivity from park to retail
centers

4. Restaurants and NightLife Activity Consider a business attraction grant with a focus on restaurant attraction to help more independently owned restaurants expand into Fountain Valley.

Short-term City, businesses, property
owners/managers,
restaurants
-Public investment in grant
program -Effectiveness
of business attraction grant
Consider a façade improvement grant program for existing restaurants. Longer-term City -Restaurant participation Explore programs to provide city assistance for financing of restaurant specific improvements that may be shared such as grease interceptors.

Long-term City, restaurants, property
owners
-Restaurant and property owner
participation
Establish Fountain Valley as an 18-hour city by enhancing efforts to attract nighttime entertainment and restaurant operators that appeal to the employee and restaurant populations.

Long-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants -increased patronage of
restaurants.

Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP) Action Items Priority Priority: Priority 1 Current FY, Priority 2 FY 2024/25, Priority 3 FY 2025/26, Priority 4 FY 2026/27 Page 6 Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics Work with the Vietnamese owned restaurants to organize and market special events focused on attracting Vietnamese population to Fountain Valley.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants and cafes -Percent of participating
restaurants -Number
of events & participation at events
by restaurants and attendees

6. City Hall Engagement Develop an informational/investment packet for specific key industries (food/medical). Longer-term City Staff -Creation of material -Regular review and maintenance of online
materials
Develop targeted short videos to help tell our story Longer-term City Staff, local businesses -Creation of short videos -Regular review and update videos
(quarterly, biannually, or yearly)
Develop an effective brand for marketing Fountain Valley as an outstanding place to live, work, visit, shop, dine and invest. As part of this effort, ensure that www.ExperienceFV.org is up to date.

Short-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of story/branding for
City's Economic Development
-Updates made to Experience
FV.org
Explore ways to create successful special events such as Restaurant Week, to capitalize on the abundance and diversity of restaurants in the community.

Short-term City, local businesses,
property owners/managers
-Creation of restaurant week
-Participation numbers for
restaurants and attendees -
Number of events
Focus Area EDAP Action Item HdL Timeline Partners Success Metrics

1. The Crossings The Crossing appears to not have a specific identity. The city should undertake the rebranding of the commercial sections of the area, based upon the existing and desired uses.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, local property
owners/managers, existing
businesses located in The
Crossings
-Creation of branding for the
commercial areas of The Crossings
Amend the existing Crossings Specific Plan as appropriate. longer-term City, local businesses, local property owners/mangers
N/A
Priority 4 Action Items (FY 2026/27)

1. The Crossings, 2. Shopping Centers, 3. Mile Square Park, 4. Restaurants and Night-Life Activity

3. Mile Square Park Explore opportunities for additional recreational amenities and concessions at Cityowned property at Mile Square Park.Longer-term City, park users -Investment in new or improved recreational amenities or
concessions

6. City Hall Engagement Develop a strategic foreign direct investment plan to attract investment. Longer-term City Staff

7. Other Economic
Development Activities
Continue to upgrade technology and utility infrastructure to help with economic development efforts.

Longer-term City -Investment in upgrading
technology and utility for economic
development purposes
Ensure land use policies are appropriate for future redevelopment or repositioning opportunities aimed at producing the 'highest and best uses' over the long-term.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Number of amendments to land
use policies aimed at enhancing FV
+ effectiveness of those
amendments
Explore new technology possibilities for Fountain Valley's planning services functions (and their supporting consultants) to electronically accept and process plan review submittals.

Longer-term City -Investment in upgrading
technology for FV's planning
services -
Improvements in efficiency due to
technology investment
Consider ways to capitalize on the fact that Fountain Valley is a gateway to leisure destinations Orange County, in particular Huntington Beach and Anaheim.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of marketing materials
capitalizing on FV as a gateway city
to leisure destinations
Diversify the business mix in Fountain Valley and work with brokers and developers to fill vacancies with the "right" types of businesses.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Number of new, diverse
businesses filling vacancies in
Fountain Valley
Consider new and innovative ways to attract vehicular traffic off the I-405 and into the community (targeted ads, electronic billboards, etc.). Build on previous marketing attempts by incorporating the rebranding or new branding efforts for the major shopping centers, restaurants and night-life, and Mile Square Park.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property owners/managers
-Investment in marketing
-Effectiveness of marketing efforts

1. The Crossings, 2. Shopping Centers, 3. Mile Square Park, 4. Restaurants and Night-Life Activity

5. Medical and Health Care, 6. City Hall Engagement, 7. Other Economic Development Activities Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Focus Area EDAP Action Item Timeline Partners Success Metrics Priority Assigned to

Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/managers
-Percent total known
businesses included in
inventory
1 The city should continue to communicate with the property owners in person annually (and their real estate representatives) to understand their desire for potential for development and be aware of development opportunities that fit within the property owners and city's objectives.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, local businesses,
local property
owners/managers
- Percent of vacant
spaces -
Total vacancy rate
2 The Specific Plan defines the geographic boundaries; however, the city should consider clearly identifying commercial boundaries within the area to help market and identify existing and future business and development opportunities more easily.

Short-term City, local property
owners/managers
-Completion of
commercial boundary
identification
3 The Crossing appears to not have a specific identity. The city should undertake the rebranding of the commercial sections of the area, based upon the existing and desired uses.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, local property
owners/managers,
existing businesses
located in The
Crossings
-Creation of branding for
the commercial areas of
The Crossings
2 Given the existing mix of home furnishings businesses, one niche option to consider is new short-term branding and marketing opportunities to designate this as a Design + Home Furnishings District in support of existing businesses in the Crossings that fall within those categories.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, existing design
and home furnishings
businesses located in
The Crossings
-Percent of businesses
interested in
participating in a Design
+ Home Furnishings
District
2 The city should work with existing businesses to undertake a focused marketing campaign to market the businesses in the area to residents and outside the community consumers.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/managers
-Creation of marketing
campaign -Percent
businesses participating
in marketing campaign
2 Amend the existing Crossings Specific Plan as appropriate. longer-term City, local businesses,
local property
owners/mangers
N/A 4
Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)

2. Shopping
Centers
The city should verify the ownership and property managers for each of the centers and schedule one-on-one meetings with them.

Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Percent of total known
owners/managers
verified -
Number of meetings
with owners/managers
1 The city should identify existing or pending vacancies with the centers
Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Percent of known
vacant or underutilized
spaces identified
1 The city should identify existing uses that may not be the highest and best use of the property or buildings. If there are uses that appear to be underutilized, work with the property owners to potentially redevelop those properties.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Number of properties
identified
3 Assist property owners in marketing the centers and specific businesses
Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Increase in business
customer activity
3 Participate in trade shows such as International Shopping Centers (ICSC) and the American Lodging Investment Summit (ALIS).

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, businesses, local
property owners
-Filling vacant spaces
with new business
attraction
1 Work with the property owners on strategies to assist with aesthetic improvements to the centers. Consider programs to waive city fees or pay overtime.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, businesses, local
property owners
-Investment in existing
properties
3/4

3. Mile Square Park Work with hotels for package deals for people and event organizers who are staying in Fountain Valley for Sporting events at Mile Square Park.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, Hotels -Number of hotels
providing package deal
-Investment/deal
provided by hotels -
Number of Mile Square
Park users who use the
hotel package(s)
1 Analyze the restaurants that are within convenient driving distance from the park. Consider whether there are any voids in types of restaurants that would cater to families
Longer-term City, restaurants -Number of restaurant
voids filled (if voids
exist)
2 Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Explore opportunities for additional recreational amenities and concessions at City-owned property at Mile Square Park.

Longer-term City, park users
-Investment in new or
improved recreational
amenities or concessions
4 Create hotel and restaurant guides for visitors and event organizers who come to Fountain Valley for sporting or other events held at Mile Square Park on the food and over-night stay options within the city limits. Create a few "templates" for oneday or multi-day visits to Fountain Valley geared towards families or other key users of the Mile Square Park.

Short-term City, Hotels,
Restaurants -Number hotels and
restaurants willing to
participate in a guide
program -Visits to
online hotel and
restaurant guide
2 Evaluate pedestrian and bicycle connectivity between Mile Square Park and major retail areas in Fountain Valley to determine opportunities for improvements, such as adding bike lanes or crosswalks, or making improvements for overall safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular drivers.

Short-term City, park users -Investment in
improving connectivity
from park to retail
centers
3/4

4. Restaurants and
Night-Life Activity
Consider a business attraction grant with a focus on restaurant attraction to help more independently owned restaurants expand into Fountain Valley.

Short-term
City, businesses,
property
owners/managers,
restaurants
-Public investment in
grant program -
Effectiveness of business
attraction grant
3 Identify and actively seek unique restauranteurs or developers willing to come to Fountain Valley and add value, as well as improve aesthetics of existing shopping centers or strip malls.

Longer-term City, property
owners/managers,
restaurants/businesses
-Private investment to
improve restaurant
facades
2 Consider a façade improvement grant program for existing restaurants.

Longer-term City -Restaurant
participation
3 Explore programs to provide city assistance for financing of restaurant specific improvements that may be shared such as grease interceptors.

Long-term City, restaurants,
property owners
-Restaurant and
property owner
participation
3/4
Establish Fountain Valley as an 18-hour city by enhancing efforts to attract nighttime entertainment and restaurant operators that appeal to the employee and restaurant populations.

Long-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants -increased patronage of
restaurants.
2/3
Develop a brand and logo for Fountain Valley restaurants, as well as a tagline for Fountain Valley restaurants as a destination.

Consider co-branding with Kei Concepts, the owner of several restaurants in Fountain Valley, and tie in existing themes of local Fountain Valley restaurants.

Near-term City, restaurants -Creation of brand and
logo -
Creation of restaurant
destination tagline
2 Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Build a restaurant and entertainment guide for visitors, Fountain Valley employees, and residents.

Short-term City, Park District,
Restaurants
-Number restaurants
willing to participate in a
guide program -
Visits/clicks to online
restaurant guide
1 Work with the Vietnamese owned restaurants to organize and market special events focused on attracting Vietnamese
population to Fountain Valley.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants and
cafes
-Percent of participating
restaurants -
Number of events &
participation at events
by restaurants and
attendees
3 Explore the possibility of a Night Market such as La Puente and 626 Market.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants and
community -Number of events &
participation at events
by restaurants and
attendees
1 5. Medical and
Health Care
Work with Local brokers and property owners to encourage the attraction of medical/healthcare related business.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers,
medical and healthcare
businesses
-Relationships built with
brokers and property
owners/managers
1 Identify complimentary uses and specific businesses to attract into the city to support the health care industry.

Short-term
(ongoing) City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers,
medical and healthcare
businesses
-Number of meetings
held with task force
1 Identify spaces available to meet the needs of medical related complimentary uses.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers,
medical and healthcare
businesses
-Percent of known
vacant or underutilized
spaces identified
2 Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Create restaurant and hotel guide for employees and families of hospital patients.

Short-term City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers,
medical and healthcare
businesses
-Healthcare and medical
facility by-in -Number of
guides distributed and
referenced at
restaurants and hotel
2 6. City Hall
Engagement
Develop a toolkit for businesses outlining various available programs and incentives.

Short-term City Staff
-Creation of material -
Regular review and
maintenance of online
materials
1 VV
Develop an informational/investment packet for specific key industries (food/medical).

Longer-term City Staff
-Creation of material -
Regular review and
maintenance of online
materials
3 Conduct a targeted outreach program at various tradeshows and conferences that align with division initiatives and priorities.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff
-Tradeshow attendance
-Leads developed at
tradeshows
1 Actively participate in industry organizations and community engagement to cultivate relationships with tenants, brokers, property owners and other real estate decision maker.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff,
Local/regional
organizations, local
businesses, property
owners/managers
-Attendance at related
meetings
1 Develop a strategic foreign direct investment plan to attract investment.

Longer-term City Staff - 4
Develop a Business Concierge Service wherein businesses receive one-on-one assistance to navigate through the city's permitting, entitlement and development process.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff - 2
Strengthen social media presence with active postings. Short-term (ongoing)
City Staff -Social media postings,
following and
engagement
1 Feature business successes, new openings, and entrepreneurs. Short-term (ongoing)
City Staff, local
businesses
-Number of businesses
featured per quarter
2 Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Develop targeted short videos to help tell our story Longer-term City Staff, local businesses
-Creation of short videos
-Regular review and
update videos
(quarterly, biannually, or
yearly)
3 7. Other Economic
Development
Activities
Form a 'Team Fountain Valley' comprised of key city staff to help support existing Fountain Valley businesses as well as quickly advance new development opportunities in Fountain Valley, including having an ombudsman or concierge program.

Near-term City
-Defining roles for
development
ombudsman or
concierge program roles
and assigning staff
2/3
Continue to upgrade technology and utility infrastructure to help with economic development efforts.

Longer-term City
-Investment in
upgrading technology
and utility for economic
development purposes
4 Ensure land use policies are appropriate for future redevelopment or repositioning opportunities aimed at producing the 'highest and best uses' over the long-term.

Longer-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Number of
amendments to land use
policies aimed at
enhancing FV +
effectiveness of those
amendments
4 Explore new technology possibilities for Fountain Valley's planning services functions (and their supporting consultants) to electronically accept and process plan review submittals.

Longer-term City
-Investment in
upgrading technology
for FV's planning
services -
Improvements in
efficiency due to
technology investment
4 Work with leading businesses and business stakeholders in the community in the formulation of a new Shop Local marketing program to assist independently owned small businesses in Fountain Valley.

Near-term City, businesses 2
Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Constantly seek quality development for Fountain Valley that creates a strong sense of place or placemaking through consistent design standards, amenities, and effective public spaces.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Quality development
opportunities/leads -
Number of quality
development leads that
come to fruition
2 Tell the Fountain Valley story to better market business and/or development of opportunities in Fountain Valley.

Short-term
City, local businesses,
property
owner/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of
story/branding for City's
Economic Development
1 Develop an effective brand for marketing Fountain Valley as an outstanding place to live, work, visit, shop, dine and invest. As part of this effort, ensure that www.ExperienceFV.org is up to date.

Short-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of
story/branding for City's
Economic Development
-Updates made to
Experience FV.org
3 Consider ways to capitalize on the fact that Fountain Valley is a gateway to leisure destinations Orange County, in particular Huntington Beach and Anaheim.

Longer-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of marketing
materials capitalizing on
FV as a gateway city to
leisure destinations
3/4
Creation of an Economic Development Tourism Advisory Group consisting of City Staff, as well as business and Chamber leaders.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, leisure industry
and other businesses,
Chamber
-Number of meetings
held with Advisory
Group -Follow
through on
recommended Action
Items from the Group
2 Conduct a survey of the small business community on identifying barriers to business growth, along with soliciting ways to enhance the business climate in Fountain Valley.

Short-term City, local businesses -Number total responses to survey
2 Diversify the business mix in Fountain Valley and work with brokers and developers to fill vacancies with the "right" types of businesses.

Longer-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Number of new, diverse
businesses filling
vacancies in Fountain
Valley
3/4
Economic Development Action Plan (EDAP)
Explore ways to create successful special events such as Restaurant Week, to capitalize on the abundance and diversity of restaurants in the community.

Short-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers -Creation of restaurant
week -Participation
numbers for restaurants
and attendees -Number
of events
3/4
Consider new and innovative ways to attract vehicular traffic off the I-405 and into the community (targeted ads, electronic billboards, etc.). Build on previous marketing attempts by incorporating the rebranding or new branding efforts for the major shopping centers, restaurants and night-life, and Mile Square Park.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers
-Investment in
marketing -
Effectiveness of
marketing efforts
3/4
Create a business visitation program for Fountain Valley, where key city staff visit businesses monthly to engage in fact finding about needs and wants of local businesses.

Short-term City, local businesses -Number businesses
visited per quarter
2 Focus Area EDAP Action Item Timeline Partners Success Metrics

Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/managers
-Percent total known
businesses included in
inventory
The city should continue to communicate with the property owners in person annually (and their real estate representatives) to understand their desire for potential for development and be aware of development opportunities that fit within the property owners and city's objectives.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, local businesses,
local property
owners/managers
- Percent of vacant
spaces -
Total vacancy rate
The Specific Plan defines the geographic boundaries; however, the city should consider clearly identifying commercial boundaries within the area to help market and identify existing and future business and development opportunities more easily.

Short-term City, local property
owners/managers
-Completion of
commercial boundary
identification
The Crossing appears to not have a specific identity. The city should undertake the rebranding of the commercial sections of the area, based upon the existing and desired uses.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, local property
owners/managers,
existing businesses
located in The
Crossings
-Creation of branding for
the commercial areas of
The Crossings
Given the existing mix of home furnishings businesses, one niche option to consider is new short-term branding and marketing opportunities to designate this as a Design + Home Furnishings District in support of existing businesses in the Crossings that fall within those categories.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, existing design
and home furnishings
businesses located in
The Crossings
-Percent of businesses
interested in
participating in a Design
+ Home Furnishings
District
The city should work with existing businesses to undertake a focused marketing campaign to market the businesses in the area to residents and outside the community consumers.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/managers
-Creation of marketing
campaign -Percent
businesses participating
in marketing campaign
Amend the existing Crossings Specific Plan as appropriate. longer-term City, local businesses,
local property
owners/mangers
N/A

2. Shopping Centers The city should verify the ownership and property managers for each of the centers and schedule one-on-one meetings with them.

Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Percent of total known
owners/managers
verified -
Number of meetings
with owners/managers
The city should identify existing or pending vacancies with the centers
Near-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Percent of known
vacant or underutilized
spaces identified
The city should identify existing uses that may not be the highest and best use of the property or buildings. If there are uses that appear to be underutilized, work with the property owners to potentially redevelop those properties.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Number of properties
identified
Assist property owners in marketing the centers and specific businesses
Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, businesses, local
property
owners/property
managers
-Increase in business
customer activity
Participate in trade shows such as International Shopping Centers (ICSC) and the American Lodging Investment Summit (ALIS).

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, businesses, local
property owners
-Filling vacant spaces
with new business
attraction
Work with the property owners on strategies to assist with aesthetic improvements to the centers. Consider programs to waive city fees or pay overtime.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, businesses, local
property owners
-Investment in existing
properties

3. Mile Square Park Work with hotels for package deals for people and event organizers who are staying in Fountain Valley for Sporting events at Mile Square Park.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, Hotels -Number of hotels
providing package deal
-Investment/deal
provided by hotels -
Number of Mile Square
Park users who use the
hotel package(s)
Analyze the restaurants that are within convenient driving distance from the park. Consider whether there are any voids in types of restaurants that would cater to families
Longer-term City, restaurants -Number of restaurant
voids filled (if voids
exist)
Explore opportunities for additional recreational amenities and concessions at City-owned property at Mile Square Park.

Longer-term City, park users
-Investment in new or
improved recreational
amenities or concessions
Create hotel and restaurant guides for visitors and event organizers who come to Fountain Valley for sporting or other events held at Mile Square Park on the food and over-night stay options within the city limits. Create a few "templates" for oneday or multi-day visits to Fountain Valley geared towards families or other key users of the Mile Square Park.

Short-term City, Hotels,
Restaurants -Number hotels and
restaurants willing to
participate in a guide
program -Visits to
online hotel and
restaurant guide
Evaluate pedestrian and bicycle connectivity between Mile Square Park and major retail areas in Fountain Valley to determine opportunities for improvements, such as adding bike lanes or crosswalks, or making improvements for overall safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular drivers.

Short-term City, park users -Investment in
improving connectivity
from park to retail
centers

4. Restaurants and
Night-Life Activity
Consider a business attraction grant with a focus on restaurant attraction to help more independently owned restaurants expand into Fountain Valley.

Short-term
City, businesses,
property
owners/managers,
restaurants
-Public investment in
grant program -
Effectiveness of business
attraction grant
Identify and actively seek unique restauranteurs or developers willing to come to Fountain Valley and add value, as well as improve aesthetics of existing shopping centers or strip malls.

Longer-term City, property
owners/managers,
restaurants/businesses
-Private investment to
improve restaurant
facades
Consider a façade improvement grant program for existing restaurants.

Longer-term City -Restaurant
participation
Explore programs to provide city assistance for financing of restaurant specific improvements that may be shared such as grease interceptors.

Long-term City, restaurants,
property owners
-Restaurant and
property owner
participation
Establish Fountain Valley as an 18-hour city by enhancing efforts to attract nighttime entertainment and restaurant operators that appeal to the employee and restaurant populations.

Long-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants -increased patronage of
restaurants.

Develop a brand and logo for Fountain Valley restaurants, as well as a tagline for Fountain Valley restaurants as a destination.

Consider co-branding with Kei Concepts, the owner of several restaurants in Fountain Valley, and tie in existing themes of local Fountain Valley restaurants.

Near-term City, restaurants -Creation of brand and
logo -
Creation of restaurant
destination tagline
Build a restaurant and entertainment guide for visitors, Fountain Valley employees, and residents.

Short-term City, Park District,
Restaurants
-Number restaurants
willing to participate in a
guide program -
Visits/clicks to online
restaurant guide
Work with the Vietnamese owned restaurants to organize and market special events focused on attracting Vietnamese
population to Fountain Valley.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants and
cafes
-Percent of participating
restaurants -
Number of events &
participation at events
by restaurants and
attendees
Explore the possibility of a Night Market such as La Puente and 626 Market.

Longer-term
(ongoing)
City, restaurants and
community -Number of events &
participation at events
by restaurants and
attendees

5. Medical and
Health Care
Work with Local brokers and property owners to encourage the attraction of medical/healthcare related business.

Short-term
(ongoing) City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers,
medical and healthcare
businesses
-Number of meetings
held with task force
Identify spaces available to meet the needs of medical related complimentary uses.

Longer-term
(ongoing) City, local brokers,
property
owners/managers,
medical and healthcare
businesses
-Percent of known
vacant or underutilized
spaces identified
Create restaurant and hotel guide for employees and families of hospital patients.

6. City Hall
Engagement
Develop a toolkit for businesses outlining various available programs and incentives.

Short-term City Staff
-Creation of material -
Regular review and
maintenance of online
materials
Develop an informational/investment packet for specific key industries (food/medical).

Longer-term City Staff
-Creation of material -
Regular review and
maintenance of online
materials
Conduct a targeted outreach program at various tradeshows and conferences that align with division initiatives and priorities.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff
-Tradeshow attendance
-Leads developed at
tradeshows
Actively participate in industry organizations and community engagement to cultivate relationships with tenants, brokers, property owners and other real estate decision maker.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff,
Local/regional
organizations, local
businesses, property
owners/managers
-Attendance at related
meetings
Develop a strategic foreign direct investment plan to attract investment.

Longer-term City Staff -
Develop a Business Concierge Service wherein businesses receive one-on-one assistance to navigate through the city's permitting, entitlement and development process.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City Staff -
Strengthen social media presence with active postings. Short-term (ongoing)
City Staff -Social media postings,
following and
engagement
Feature business successes, new openings, and entrepreneurs. Short-term (ongoing)
City Staff, local
businesses
-Number of businesses
featured per quarter
Develop targeted short videos to help tell our story Longer-term City Staff, local businesses
-Creation of short videos
-Regular review and
update videos
(quarterly, biannually, or
yearly)

7. Other Economic
Development
Activities
Form a 'Team Fountain Valley' comprised of key city staff to help support existing Fountain Valley businesses as well as quickly advance new development opportunities in Fountain Valley, including having an ombudsman or concierge program.

Near-term City
-Defining roles for
development
ombudsman or
concierge program roles
and assigning staff
Continue to upgrade technology and utility infrastructure to help with economic development efforts.

Longer-term City
-Investment in
upgrading technology
and utility for economic
development purposes
Ensure land use policies are appropriate for future redevelopment or repositioning opportunities aimed at producing the 'highest and best uses' over the long-term.

Longer-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Number of
amendments to land use
policies aimed at
enhancing FV +
effectiveness of those
amendments
Explore new technology possibilities for Fountain Valley's planning services functions (and their supporting consultants) to electronically accept and process plan review submittals.

Longer-term City
-Investment in
upgrading technology
for FV's planning
services -
Improvements in
efficiency due to
technology investment
Work with leading businesses and business stakeholders in the community in the formulation of a new Shop Local marketing program to assist independently owned small businesses in Fountain Valley.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Quality development
opportunities/leads -
Number of quality
development leads that
come to fruition
Tell the Fountain Valley story to better market business and/or development of opportunities in Fountain Valley.

Short-term
City, local businesses,
property
owner/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of
story/branding for City's
Economic Development
Develop an effective brand for marketing Fountain Valley as an outstanding place to live, work, visit, shop, dine and invest. As part of this effort, ensure that www.ExperienceFV.org is up to date.

Short-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of
story/branding for City's
Economic Development
-Updates made to
Experience FV.org
Consider ways to capitalize on the fact that Fountain Valley is a gateway to leisure destinations Orange County, in particular Huntington Beach and Anaheim.

Longer-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Creation of marketing
materials capitalizing on
FV as a gateway city to
leisure destinations
Creation of an Economic Development Tourism Advisory Group consisting of City Staff, as well as business and Chamber leaders.

Short-term
(ongoing)
City, leisure industry
and other businesses,
Chamber
-Number of meetings
held with Advisory
Group -Follow
through on
recommended Action
Items from the Group
Conduct a survey of the small business community on identifying barriers to business growth, along with soliciting ways to enhance the business climate in Fountain Valley.

Short-term City, local businesses -Number total responses to survey
Diversify the business mix in Fountain Valley and work with brokers and developers to fill vacancies with the "right" types of businesses.

Longer-term
City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers, real
estate professionals
-Number of new, diverse
businesses filling
vacancies in Fountain
Valley
Explore ways to create successful special events such as Restaurant Week, to capitalize on the abundance and diversity of restaurants in the community.

Short-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers -Creation of restaurant
week -Participation
numbers for restaurants
and attendees -Number
of events
Consider new and innovative ways to attract vehicular traffic off the I-405 and into the community (targeted ads, electronic billboards, etc.). Build on previous marketing attempts by incorporating the rebranding or new branding efforts for the major shopping centers, restaurants and night-life, and Mile Square Park.

Longer-term City, local businesses,
property
owners/managers
-Investment in
marketing -
Effectiveness of
marketing efforts
Create a business visitation program for Fountain Valley, where key city staff visit businesses monthly to engage in fact finding about needs and wants of local businesses.

Short-term City, local businesses -Number businesses
visited per quarter
City of Fountain Valley
Memorandum
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Smith, Public Works Director
DATE: February 20, 2024
SUBJECT: Study Session on “Best practice for a multi-year systematic approach to program and fund building maintenance needs for City facilities” ______________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Fountain Valley maintains 31 facilities, which amounts to approximately 226,000 square feet. The age range for the facilities is 4 to 60 years, with an average of 35 years.

The City’s six-month strategic planning objectives for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024 includes the priority: “Present to City Council a best practice for a multi-year systematic approach to program and fund building maintenance needs for City facilities.” This study session is intended to provide information about facility maintenance asset management methods that may be incorporated into the City’s current programing and funding practices to create an enhanced approach toward multi-year budgeting.

DISCUSSION:

On November 16, 2023, the City Council held a strategic planning session with the executive management team and department managers. Those in attendance collaborated to establish the City’s six-month strategic planning objectives for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024. One of the selected priorities listed in the Six-Month Strategic Objectives Matrix is “Present to City Council a best practice for a multi-year systematic approach to program and fund building maintenance needs for City facilities.” This priority falls within the MAINTAIN,

BUILD, AND MODERNIZE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT GROWTH AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THE CITY three-year goal.

City staff has coordinated this Study Session in response to the subject strategic objective.

The Study Session includes a presentation by Intelligent Systems & Engineering Services (ISES) Corporation. ISES will address the importance and value of having a detailed asset data portfolio when establishing facility maintenance priorities, creating annual budgets, and

Page 2 ends

making decisions whether to repair or replace structures.

The City of Fountain Valley maintains 31 facilities, which amounts to approximately 226,000 square feet. The age range for the facilities is 4 to 60 years, with an average of 35 years.

Staff anticipates that a detailed Facility Condition Assessment (FCA), including Asset Management System (AMS) software with the data loaded into the AMS, will cost approximately $200,000. The time needed to complete an FCA and AMS database is approximately 6 months.

The City is presently conducting a technical assessment of Geographic Information System (GIS) applications and resources that are implemented within various City departments. The purpose of the assessment is to document the City’s GIS portfolio, identify the relative maturity and future direction of these systems, and to properly align with other Information Technology (IT) initiatives that are currently underway or planned.

The future AMS software solution may integrate with GIS. Therefore, staff will evaluate software compatibility and continuity with IT initiatives. With City Council direction, staff can create and budget for a facilities maintenance asset management project within an upcoming fiscal year.

Staff is seeking direction from City Council to:

1. Allocate funding in an upcoming fiscal year to complete a Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) of all City facilities, Asset Management System (AMS) database, and AMS software, or

2. Continue with the City’s present facility maintenance management practices.

Attachments:

1. City Facilities Exhibit

2. ISES slide presentation

FACILITY CONDITION

ASSESSMENTS
provided by
Who We Are
Facilities consulting firm
Established in 1987
Headquarters in Atlanta, GA
Founded to provide FCAs
Core business and primary service
Incorporated in
1987, with
worldwide
experience
Leading
provider of
Facility
Assessment
services
Expertise to assist
our clientele in
all facets
of facilities
management
operations
ISES Corp Overview
Our Services
3 BILLION

GROSS SQUARE FEET
75,000

BUILDINGS
37 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Facility Types
• Airplane hangars
• Athletics (stadiums, gyms, fields)
• Barns and stables
• Chapels and houses of
worship
• Childcare facilities
• Classrooms
• Courthouses
• Data centers
• Dining halls and restaurants
• Dorms and student
apartments
• Fire and police stations
• Fraternity and sorority houses
• Greenhouses and
observatories
• Hardscape
• Hospitals, clinics and
veterinaries
• Hotels and motels
• Jails and prisons
• Ice rinks and arenas
• Laboratories
• Libraries
• Office and admin space
• Parking lots and structures
• Parks and playgrounds
• Pools and natatoriums
• Physical plants
• Research centers
• Retail facilities
• Shops and trades bldgs
• Single-family residential
• Student unions
• Theaters, auditoriums and
film studios
• Utility infrastructure systems
• Warehouses
• Wineries
What Is an FCA?
A visual, nondestructive inspection
Identification of current and projected needs
Includes code upgrade issues and facility use change
needs
Needs are prioritized and have estimated costs
Benefits of an ISES Corp FCA
Data assists with decisions of whether
to renovate or demolish
Prioritized renewal needs with cost
estimates
Centralized database allows you to see
the big picture
Detailed lifecycle inventory of cyclical
renewable components
Why Does the City Need an FCA?
• Acts as a roadmap for
current and future
spending.
• Identifies critical building
failure points capable of
massively disrupting city
operations.
• Helps justify your budget.
“You can’t
manage
what you
can’t
measure”
John Chiang
Former CA State Treasurer
Collecting Objective Data
Proper management of an
asset portfolio means
knowing:
• What you have
• What condition it’s in
• How much EUL (Existing
Useful Life) is left
• How much it will cost to
repair or replace
Condition Assessment Program
Tires
$1800
Alignment
$210
Tune Up
$650
Struts
$3200
Belts
$500
Battery
$550
Exhaust
$2500
Oil Pan
$1500 Radiator
$1200
Intake
$1000
Rust/Paint
$1000
Repair or
replace?
Front
Brakes
$1700
Windshield
$1800
Your New Car! Life Is Good!!
Primary Goal of FCA
Generate data that
can be used to
support your facility
renewal decisions.

FCA Process
Report
Delivery
Capital
Planning
Onsite
Assessment
Upload
to AMS
Quality
Assurance
Building Systems Inspected
Exterior
Interior
ADA
Health
HVAC
Fire/Life
Safety
Vertical
Trans Site
Plumbing
Electrical
Summary of Findings
10-Year
Renewal
Needs
Nonrecurring
Deferred
(Recurring)
Projected
(Recurring)
Preliminary Energy Assessment
Benchmarking Data
• Gauges building performance against similar buildings • Measures Energy Use Intensity and Energy End Use
• Review utility bills
Energy Conservation Measures
• Potential opportunities recommended for further investigation • Categorized into cost categories to indicate approximate level of resources required
o Operations and Maintenance
o Low‐Cost/No‐Cost
o Capital Improvement
What Are Renewal Needs?
• Bringing facilities up to City
standards and conditions
• Enhancing user safety and
mitigating liability
• Renewing lifecycle of
existing assets
• Preventive maintenance
activities
• Replacements due to failure
• Cosmetic renovations
What Kind of Need?
• Renewable components
• Cyclical replacement
• Deferred or projected
renewal
• Used to forecast future
needs
Recurring
• One-time repairs or
replacements
• Accessibility or fire/life
safety improvements
• Alter building for new
use
Nonrecurring
1 Pricing Renewal Needs
• Cost library developed inhouse
• Embedded into AMS
• Uses RSMeans, but not limited
strictly to published cost data
indices
• Assessors trained to adjust useful
life to reflect actual conditions
• Better quality data results in
ability to provide realistic budget
costs
ISES
Cost
Library
Establishing CRVs
Basis City
Cost
Construction
Markup
Professional
Fees Demo Size Situational
+ + + + + +
Facility Condition Index
FCI =
Deferred Renewal
CRV
FCNI =
10-Year Renewal Needs*
CRV
Facility Condition Needs Index
*Deferred & Projected Renewal + Nonrecurring Needs
Customized FCA database
Report and presentation of
entire facilities portfolio
Individual building reports
FCA Deliverables
AMS
FCA
Deliverables
Reports
Project Summary
AMS Reporting
• Data in sortable and reportable
formats
• Reporting parameters that can be
tailored to fit your needs
• Report output supports your
budgetary and planning
processes
AMS Database
• Provided for one year
• Houses FCA data
• Web-based and user-friendly
• Includes unlimited training
• Reports can be exported to PDF
and Excel
Our Track Record
• Deliver project as
proposed, at original
quoted price
• Continual support
• Findings result in
increased funding
levels for our clients
Commitment
to

SERVICE
Dedication
to

QUALITY
Regular
callbacks to
perform
additional
services
Better Data. Better Decisions.

Thank You!
Tony Simpson
Vice President
909.206.3303
[email protected]

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA
City Facilities
Number Description Address Sq Feet Year Built / Remodeled Age 1 CITY HALL OFFICES 10200 SLATER AVENUE 17,751 1964 602 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10200 SLATER AVENUE 4,555 1964 603 POLICE FACILITY 10200 SLATER AVENUE 60,250 1983 414 POLICE STORAGE 10200 SLATER AVENUE 1,500 2013 115 CITY HALL UTILITY CENTER 10200 SLATER AVENUE 900 2013 116 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB 10200 SLATER AVENUE 8,721 1974 507 DAY CARE 17565 LOS ALAMOS 9,311 1964 608 FIRE STATION # 1 17737 BUSHARD STREET 8,519 1964 609 FIRE STATION # 2 16767 NEWHOPE STREET 5,141 1966 58 10 PARKS BUILDINGS 17902 LOS ALAMOS 707 1968 5611 WATER RESERVOIR # 1 18460 EUCLID STREET 2,103 2015 912 WATER RESERVOIR # 2 9300 TANAGER STREET 3,592 2020 413 WELL PUMP SITE # 4 17300 CALLE ZARGOZA 900 1971 5314 WELL PUMP SITE # 12 16201 EUCLID 2,200 2000 2415 WELL PUMP SITE # 8 MT. RICHARDSON/EDINGER 1,250 1977 4716 STORM WATER PUMP STATION 16489 SANDALWOOD STREET 600 2017 717 STORM WATER PUMP STATION 8917 COCKATOO AVENUE 1,033 2020 418 RECREATION CENTER 16400 BROOKHURST STREET 21,945 1973 5119 RESTROOM STORAGE CONCESSION (TENNIS CENTER) 16400 BROOKHURST ST. 721 1975 4920 RESTROOM CONCESSION 16400 BROOKHURST ST. 721 1975 4921 RESTROOM CONCESSION 16400 BROOKHURST ST. 721 1981 4322 RESTROOM CONCESSION 16400 BROOKHURST ST. 721 1985 3923 LIBRARY 17635 LOS ALAMOS STREET 15,578 2000 2424 WELL PUMP SITE # 10 17032 NEWHOPE STREET 1,705 1990 3425 WELL PUMP SITE # 11 16640 BROOKHURST STREET 1,350 1990 3426 WELL PUMP SITE # 6 11775 WARNER AVE 600 1976 4827 CITY YARD 17300 MT HERRMANN STREET 29,390 1989 3528 THE CENTER AT FOUNDERS VILLAGE SR. COMM. CENTER 17967 BUSHARD ST. 16,652 2005 1929 WELL PUMP SITE # 9 9293 POINSETTIA 1,576 2010 1430 RESTROOM CONCESSION - SNACK A 16400 BROOKHURST STREET 2,310 2008 1631 RESTROOM CONCESSION - SNACK B 16400 BROOKHURST STREET 3,070 2008 16 Total Square Feet = 226,093 Avg. Age = 35

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL MEMO
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: February 20, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Enhanced Notification Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

At their regularly scheduled meeting on November 21, 2023, the City Council directed Staff to review the City’s existing Enhanced Notification Policy and provide options for additional methods that could be used to reach a greater number of residents. In order to provide a comprehensive and outside perspective, the City hired Tripepi Smith, a consulting firm specializing in outreach and communications.

DISCUSSION:

The report developed by Tripepi Smith is attached to this Memorandum and will be covered in greater detail as part of the Study Session. The report describes the requirements of State Law, reviews the City’s current Enhanced Notification Policy, provides comparisons to surrounding cities and provides an array of options for City Council consideration.

Prepared By: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director
Reviewed By: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Notification Policy Report dated January 30, 2024

2. Recommended Action Item Prioritization
City of Fountain Valley
Community Development Notification
Policy Report
Submitted January 30, 2024, by:

Jon Barilone, Principal
Kylie Sun, Business Analyst
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 3 State of California Legal Requirements for Noticing ....................................................... 3 Existing City Notification Policy - June 2022 ................................................................... 4 Notification Policy Comparison Research ........................................................................ 6 Additional Ideas to Consider ........................................................................................... 9 Executive Summary
The City of Fountain Valley Community Development Department provides services designed to protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare. Comprised of current and advanced planning, building and safety services, code enforcement, and housing, the department focuses on the future as well as the present in its mission to ensure orderly development throughout the city.

The Community Development Department has partnered with Tripepi Smith to conduct research on the State’s legal requirements for public noticing, evaluate the City of Fountain Valley’s public notification policy, and compare it to surrounding comparable cities. This report outlines our findings and provides recommendations to enhance the City’s current notification process.

State of California Legal Requirements for Noticing
The State of California requires minimum levels of notice that must be provided to the public prior to holding a hearing on a private development project or planning and zoning matter.

This report highlights key requirements of the State law according to California Legislature (1984) CHAPTER 2.7. Public Hearings 65090 – 65096.

Color key:
• Red text outlines how notice shall be delivered.
• Orange text outlines when notice shall be delivered.
• Green text outlines to whom notice shall be delivered. 65090.
(a) When a provision of this title requires notice of a public hearing to be given pursuant to this section, notice shall be published pursuant to Section 6061 in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdiction of the local agency which is conducting the proceeding at least 10 days prior to the hearing, or if there is no such newspaper of general circulation, the notice shall be posted at least 10 days prior to the hearing in at least three public places within the jurisdiction of the local agency. 65091.
(a) When a provision of this title requires notice of a public hearing to be given pursuant to this section, notice shall be given in all of the following ways:
(1) Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to the owner of the subject real property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll.
(2) N/A for our purposes.
(3) Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to each local agency expected to provide water, sewage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services to the project, whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be significantly affected. (4) Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to all owners of real property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll within 300 feet of the real property that is the subject of the hearing. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed or delivered pursuant to this paragraph or paragraph (1) is greater than 1,000, a local agency, in lieu of mailed or delivered notice, may provide notice by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the local agency in which the proceeding is conducted at least 10 days prior to the hearing. (5) If the notice is mailed or delivered pursuant to paragraph (4), the notice shall also either be:
(A) Published pursuant to Section 6061 in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the local agency which is conducting the proceeding at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
(B) Posted at least 10 days prior to the hearing in at least three public places within the boundaries of the local agency, including one public place in the area directly affected by the proceeding.
65092.
(a) When a provision of this title requires notice of a public hearing to be given pursuant to Section 65090 or 65091, the notice shall also be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to any person who has filed a written request for notice with either the clerk of the governing body or with any other person designated by the governing body to receive these requests.

Existing City Notification Policy - June 2022
The City of Fountain Valley has historically provided notice that exceeds the minimum amounts required by State law. The City’s policy (last updated June 2022) outlines the City’s standards for providing “enhanced” notice or notice that exceeds State requirements.

The City’s enhancements to State law noticing requirements are laid out as follows. Significant enhancements are bolded for emphasis.

Whenever a public hearing is required to be noticed in accordance with Government Code Section 65091, the following shall apply:

1. When notice is to be mailed or delivered pursuant to 65091 (a)(3), the 300-foot noticing distance shall be increased to 500 feet. The 500-foot noticing distance provided for by this Policy shall be measured from the exterior property lines of the real property that is the subject of the hearing.
a. Notification boundaries shall include lots on both sides of interior residential streets.
b. All developed property not identified on the latest equalized assessor’s tax role but for which Certificate of Occupancies have been issued by the City should be notified and addressed as “Occupant.”

2. For a project that is located on real property that fronts an arterial street, the 500-foot radius shall not include the width of the arterial street and shall begin on the opposite side of the street.

3. For a project that is located adjacent to freeway right-of-way, the 500-foot radius shall not include the width of the freeway right-of-way and shall begin on the opposite side of the freeway right-of-way.

4. For a project that is located on property next to a mobile home park, notification via delivery or mail shall be provided to the occupants of each mobile home space that is located within the 500 ft. radius in addition to the owner of the mobile home park.

5. For a project that is adjacent to a homeowners’ association, for which the names and addresses of the officers of the homeowners’ association are on file with the City, all officers of said homeowners’ association shall be notified.

6. For a project that has regional significance, the Community Development Director shall provide notice to a significantly larger area as determined in his or her discretion.

7. For a project that is located within or adjacent to commercial or industrial centers, notice shall be provided to the property owner of the commercial or industrial center as well as to the commercial industrial tenants located within the 500-foot radius.

For any development project (public or private), notice of the project shall be provided, along with a brief description of the project, in the electronic Fountain Valley Newsletter, at least 10 calendar days prior to the City Council of Planning Commission meeting at which the project will be discussed or acted upon.

For any development project (private or public) that is proposed to be 5 stories or above, or 60 feet in height or above (as measured from the ground adjacent to the project), notice of any discussion or action before the City Council or Planning Commission shall be provided at least 10 calendar days prior to the public meeting at which the project will be discussed or acted upon, as follows:

1. By advertisement on the Public Cable Television Authority; and

2. By email to all persons on the City’s list of recipients of the electronic Fountain Valley Newsletter.

Notification Policy Comparison Research
While the City of Fountain Valley exceeds the public noticing requirements as outlined by the State of California, the city can benefit from reviewing the notification practices of surrounding cities and cities of similar populations. This report outlines the notification policies of 10 comparable cities, organized by population size.

City & Key Information Radius Notification Enhancements

1. City of Seal Beach
Population: 25,046
Area: 11.29 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Similar in
land area.

Information source:

11.5.10.025 Public
Notification. Section A.
500 ft. One page in the newspaper is needed for
more significant developments in Seal
Beach.

2. City of Cypress
Population: 49,955
Area: 6.58 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Similar
population, similar in land area.

Information source:

Notice of Hearing
500 ft. The City of Cypress provides notifications
via its local newspaper.

3. City of Placentia
Population: 51,951
Area: 6.62 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Similar in
population, similar in land area.

Information Source:

Development Plan Review
300 ft. -
500 ft.

The City of Placentia does not provide
any notification enhancements.

4. City of Tustin 300 ft. -
500 ft.

The City of Tustin does not provide any
notification enhancements.

Population: 79,514
Area: 11.08 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity, similar in land area.

Information Source: Instructions for
Filling a Development Action Section
B. Submittal Requirement Checklist
and Description

5. City of Newport Beach
Population: 85,159
Area: 23.80 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity.

Information source:

Public Hearing Requirements
Attachment B
300 ft. The City of Newport Beach does not
provide any notification enhancements.

6. City of Westminster
Population: 90,638
Area: 10.05 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity, similar in land area.

Information source:

Land Use and Development
Application Packet, page 5 (section
17-21)
300 ft. -
500 ft.

The City of Westminster does not provide
any notification enhancements.

7. City of Costa Mesa
Population: 111,490
Area: 15.65 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity.
700 ft.,
900 ft. or
1,100 ft
The City of Costa Mesa provides an onsite posting in the form of a flyer.

Newspaper publication is also required
for more significant development
projects.

Developments 150-225 feet in height
require a 700-foot notification radius;
Information source:

Code of Ordinance: Chapter III
Planning Applications, Section 13-29
d.
developments 225-300 feet in height
require a 900-foot notification radius;
developments more than 300 feet in
height require a 1,100-foot notification
radius.

8. City of Garden Grove
Population: 171,637
Area: 17.94 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity.

Information source:

Land Permit Use General Information
Section IV. Application Process
500 ft. The City of Garden Grove does not
provide any notification enhancements.

9. City of Huntington Beach
Population: 197,481
Area: 26.75 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity.

Information source: Public
Notification Policy
500 ft. The City of Huntington Beach provides
(General Plan Amendments) and ZMA's
(Zoning Map Amendments) for public
school sites or for sites larger than 5
acres.

10. City of Santa Ana
Population: 311,379
Area: 27.27 sq mi
Reason for comparing: Close in
proximity.

Information source:

Sunshine Ordinance Example of Onsite Public Notice Page 2 300ft. or
2,000 ft.

In accordance with the Sunshine
Ordinance, the City of Santa Ana requires
notifications to be sent out via mail
notices, flyers, newspapers, and
newsletters.

The City of Santa Ana requires a 2,000-
foot radius within city boundaries and a
300-foot radius outside city boundaries.

All residents within those radii must be
alerted of the upcoming development.

Additional Ideas to Consider
As noted, the City of Fountain Valley already exceeds the public noticing requirements as outlined by the State of California. Tripepi Smith has outlined a few additional ideas to enhance the City’s existing practices, which range from policy modifications to leveraging the City's existing communication platforms. It will be up to City leadership to determine the viability of these ideas:

1. Double the City's current noticing radius from 500 feet to 1,000 feet.

2. Establish a 1:20 noticing requirement for building height. For every one foot of building height, the noticing would go out 20 additional feet.

3. Establish thresholds for when a project would trigger a Citywide notice, such as a certain height limit.

4. Double what is required by State law.
a. The State of California requires notification of projects for a 300 ft radius. In Fountain Valley, provide notification for all within a 600 ft radius. b. The State of California requires a 10-day notice. In Fountain Valley, provide a 20-day notice.

1. Note: A 20-day noticing period may delay projects or have an impact on economic development efforts. We’d recommend establishing thresholds for when a 20-day notice is required, and when a 10-day notice will suffice.

5. "Boost" posts about notices on Facebook and Instagram, targeting everyone who selfidentifies as living in Fountain Valley. a. This requires a dedicated budget for these digital placements, as the minimum suggested spend for each post is approximately $100-200. b. Your strategy may include lumping several notices together in a single post, or a single notice with a call to action to visit the Community Development webpage for more information.

6. Leverage the targeting features of Nextdoor to post every notice. a. The radius can be anywhere from 0.5 miles to 2 miles out from a specific address.

7. Develop a "self-serve" GIS map that is consistently updated with new developments throughout the city.
a. Host the GIS map on the City’s website, specifically on the City’s Community Development webpage.
b. Ensure residents are aware of the GIS map by pushing out information on where to find it and how to use it, via the City’s existing communication methods. c. Note: It is our understanding the City does not have the capability of executing a GIS map at this time. In the meantime, the City could consider creating an interactive Google Map, which allows a “Name” and “Description” for each pin.

8. Provide email/text notifications for members of the public who want to specifically be notified of all developments in the city, regardless of where they are happening. a. Individual notifications via the website's Notify Me function. b. AND/OR, provide a separate function dedicated to development notices only.

9. Dedicate a certain section/percentage of regular City communications to development updates.
a. A section within a larger, more regular communication, such as the monthly City Manager's Update or quarterly City Manager's Report.
b. Establish a baseline of how often the City will point social media followers/subscribers to the City's Community Development webpage, such as twice a month.

10. Include a compilation/summary of notices as part of every Council Meeting agenda.

11. Increase the threshold for when notices need to be posted on the local cable television network (PCTA).

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL POLICY

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION

POLICY STATEMENT
State law provides various minimum levels of notice that must be provided to the public prior to holding a hearing on a private development project or planning and zoning matter.

The City of Fountain Valley has historically provided notice that exceeds the minimum amounts required by State law. This Policy details the City’s standards for providing enhanced notice of such projects and matters.

REQUIRED NOTICE
Notwithstanding anything in this Policy to the contrary, the minimum amount of notice shall be that which is required by State law. Anything above the minimum notice required by State law is referred to herein as “enhancing noticing.” The enhanced noticing provisions of this Policy are directive, not mandatory. The failure to provide the enhanced notice discussed in this Policy shall not void or invalidate any City action, discussion, or decision.

ENHANCEMENTS TO STATE LAW NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Whenever a public hearing is required to be noticed in accordance with Government Code Section 65091, the following shall apply:

1. When notice is to be mailed or delivered pursuant to 65091(a)(3), the 300-foot noticing distance shall be increased to 500 feet. The 500-foot noticing distance provided for by this Policy shall be measured from the exterior property lines of the real property that is the subject of the hearing.
a. Notification boundaries shall include lots on both sides of interior residential streets.
b. All developed property not identified on the latest equalized assessor’s tax role but for which Certificate of Occupancies have been issued by the City should be notified and addressed as “Occupant.”

2. For a project that is located on real property that fronts an arterial street, the 500- foot radius shall not include the width of the arterial street and shall begin on the opposite side of the street.

5. For a project that is adjacent to a homeowners’ association, for which the names and addresses of officers of the homeowners’ association are on file with the City, all officers of said homeowners’ association shall be notified.

6. For a project that has regional significance, the Community Development Director shall provide notice to a significantly larger area as determined in his or her discretion.

7. For a project that is located within or adjacent to commercial or industrial centers, notice shall be provided to the property owner of the commercial or industrial center as well as to all commercial/industrial tenants located within the 500-foot radius.

ENHANCED NOTICE OF ALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
For any development project (public or private), notice of the project shall be provided, along with a brief description of the project, in the electronic Fountain Valley Newsletter, at least 10 calendar days prior to the City Council or Planning Commission meeting at which the project will be discussed or acted upon.

ENHANCED NOTICE OF LARGER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
For any development project (public or private) that is proposed to be 5 stories or more, or 60 feet in height or above (as measured from the ground adjacent to the project) (see FVMC 21.18.050), notice of any discussion or action before the City Council or Planning Commission shall be provided (as used herein, notice is considered provided on the day it is placed for pickup in the US Mail) at least 10 calendar days prior to the public meeting at which the project will be discussed or acted upon, as follows:

1. By advertisement on the Public Cable Television Authority; and

2. By posting the item on the City’s website; and

3. By postcard to all residential properties in the City.

Adopted/Effective: This policy shall supersede the City Council’s Policy on Public Notification adopted on March 21, 1989, including any amendments thereto.

MINUTES OF THE

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FOUNTAIN

VALLEY AGENCY

FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ FOUNTAIN VALLEY

HOUSING AUTHORITY
Closed Session 4:15 p.m.

Study Session 5:00 p.m.

Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Tuesday, January 30, 2024
Council Chambers

CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 5:15 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Closed Session matters only)
There were no public comments

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6.

2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 17101 Bushard Street and 17737 Bushard Street, Fountain Valley, CA 92708Agency negotiator: Maggie Le, City Manager, Omar Dadabhoy, Community Development Director / Deputy City Manager, Scott Smith, Director of Public Works, Colin Burns, Attorney for the City, Ryan Smith, Finance Director, Bill McQuaid, Fire Chief
Negotiating parties: City of Fountain Valley and Laguna Beach County Water District

Page 6 ends

Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
No Reportable Action

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 Potential Case – Join Amicus Support re Johnson v. City of Grants Pass USSCT) Item was brought forward as a late breaking item. City Council voted 5-0 to introduce the item into Closed Session. The City Council voted 5-0 to approve joining the amicus brief.

STUDY SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 5:05 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Study Session matters only)
There were no public comments on Study Session items

1. Presentation on the Orange County Power Authority – Presentation by Scott Smith, Public Works Director
Representatives from both Orange County Power Authority and SCE presented the benefits of their programs. City Council requested that the city give authorization to the OCPA to pull our current power needs and usage rates in the City.

2. Group Homes Update – Presentation by Bill Curley, Harper & Burns Bill Curley presented options of moving forward with the Group Homes item on tonight’s agenda.

OPEN SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 6:01 p.m.

INVOCATION Council Member Jim Cunneen
SALUTE TO THE FLAG Council member Kim Constantine

Page 7 ends

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY/ ROLL CALL Council Members Present: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Vice Mayor/Vice Chair Bui, Mayor/Chair Grandis

Council Members Absent: None

ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS
Bill Curley provided information to the City Council in regards to item 2 on the Study Session.

PRESENTATIONS
 Certificate of Recognition Presented to Tam Nguyen – Presentation by Mayor Glenn Grandis Mayor Grandis presented a Certificate of Recognition to Tam Nguyen.  Certificate of Recognition to Pizza D’z for their Free Meal Holiday Program – Certificate Presented by Mayor Glenn Grandis
Mayor Grandis recognized Pizza D’z with a Certificate of Recognition for their Free Meal Holiday Program.
 City of Kindness Recognition to Paul and Christie Araiza Mayor Grandis recognized Paul and Christie Araiza with a City of Kindness award for all there help with the tree lighting ceremony.
 Update from SIFI – Introduction by Scott Smith, Public Works Director Jordan Harris of SIFI gave an update on the progress SIFI is making installing there fiber network throughout the city.

FIRST CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
None

Page 8 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar Items 1 – 3 and 5 – 8 were approved simultaneously. Item number 4 was pulled by Mayor Grandis for discussion.

1. Waive the reading in full of all ordinances under consideration and direct the Mayor to read by titles only.

ACTION: Move to waive the reading in full of all ordinances under consideration and direct the Mayor to read by titles only
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

2. 3.

Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the January 16, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting ACTION: Move to Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the January 16, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Approve the Register of Demands for the period of 1/6/2024 to 1/19/2024 ACTION: Move to Approve Register of Demands for the period of 1/6/2024 to 1/19/2024 MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

Page 9 ends

ABSTAIN: None

4. Item Pulled by Mayor Grandis
Second Read and Adoption of An Ordinance Adding Chapters 4.35 Group Homes and 21.29 Group Homes and Amending Section 21.08.030 Residential Zoning District Land Uses and Permit Requirements to the Fountain Valley Municipal Code Public Comments: Amber Pitt, Chad Pitt, Barbara Breznan, Ben Nielsen, Joseph Milligan, Krystle Bevins, Evan Jorgensen, Jill Tanner, Denise Lobianco and Lyle Schepple ACTION: Move to Approve the Second Read and Adoption of An Ordinance Adding Chapters 4.35 Group Homes and 21.29 Group Homes and Amending Section

21.08.030 Residential Zoning District Land Uses and Permit Requirements to the Fountain Valley Municipal Code
MOTION: Harper SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

5. City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Update for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024
ACTION: Move to Approve the City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Update for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024
MOTION: Harper SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Page 10 ends

6. Request to Destroy Police Department Records
ACTION: Move to Approve the Request to Destroy Police Department Records MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

7. Approval of a Resolution of the City of Fountain Valley implementing preferential permit parking for TET Festival, Easter, Cinco de Mayo, Mother's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day and Labor Day for 2024
ACTION: Move to Approve a Resolution of the City of Fountain Valley implementing preferential permit parking for TET Festival, Easter, Cinco de Mayo, Mother's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day and Labor Day for 2024
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

8. Adopt a Resolution Approving Application for Specified Grant Funds from the California Budget Act of 2023; Fountain Valley Universally Accessible Playground ACTION: Move to Approve a Resolution Approving Application for Specified Grant Funds from the California Budget Act of 2023; Fountain Valley Universally Accessible Playground
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Page 11 ends

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

9. Award a Construction Contract to Global Road Sealing, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Modifications for Euclid Street at Condor Avenue, and Talbert Avenue at Bushard Street Project ACTION: Move to Award a Construction Contract to Global Road Sealing, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Modifications for Euclid Street at Condor Avenue, and Talbert Avenue at Bushard Street Project
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Cunneen
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

10. Demolition Services for SPEC Building Project
ACTION: Move to Approve Demolition Services for SPEC Building Project MOTION: Harper SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

11. Preliminary Architectural and Concept Design Services for Fire Station 1 ACTION: Move to Approve Preliminary Architectural and Concept Design Services for Fire Station 1
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Bui
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Page 12 ends

12. 13.

Hosting Agreements for GeoViewer Online, Mobile & CMMS Work Order ACTION: Move to Approve Hosting Agreements for GeoViewer Online, Mobile & CMMS Work Order
MOTION: Constantine SECOND: Harper
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Adopt a Resolution to effect certain changes to the City’s Master Salary Schedule in conformance with Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5 and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System
ACTION: Move to Approve a Resolution to effect certain changes to the City’s Master Salary Schedule in conformance with Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5 and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System MOTION: Cunneen SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Constantine, Cunneen, Harper, Bui, Grandis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

APPOINTMENTS

14. Committee, Commission and Board Appointments for 2024 – Presentation by Rick Miller, City Clerk
Advisory Committee for the Persons with Disabilities
The following applicants were appointed to the Committee by a 5-0 vote from the City Council:

Philip Nisco, Jan Werts, Kayla Borack and Glenn Bleiweis Fountain Valley Community Foundation
The following applicants were appointed to the Committee by a 5-0 vote from the City Council:

Rob Frizzelle and Dennis Cole. Jynene Johnson was appointed by a 4-0 vote.

Housing and Community Development
The following applicants were appointed to the Committee by a 5-0 vote from the City Council:

Michael White and Matthew Langer

Page 13 ends

Measure HH Committee
The following applicants were appointed to the Committee by a 5-0 vote from the City Council:

Randy Takayama
Planning Commission
The following applicants were appointed to the Commission. Anh Vu received 4 votes, Richard Lopez received 3 votes and Matthew Langer received 3 votes. Cheryl Brothers was voted as the Planning Commission alternate by a 4-1 vote from the City Council.

COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION
None

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
None
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY AB 1234/GENERAL COMMENTS Vice Mayor Bui
January 17 Attended the Committee / Commission Interviews January 18 Attended the Mayor’s Breakfast
January 24-26 Attended the Cal Cities Mayor’s and Councilmembers Conference January 28 Attended the 5 year anniversary of Grocery Outlet Council Member Cunneen
January 17 Attended the Committee / Commission Interviews January 18 Attended the Mayor’s Breakfast
January 25 Attended the orange County Library Board Meeting Mayor Grandis
January 17 Attended the PCTA Board meeting, filmed the first city Podcast with David Troung, the OCTA Sanitation District steering meeting and the committee / commission interviews
January 18 Attended the Mayors Breakfast
January 22 Attended the Cal Cities Sober Living task Force January 23 Attended the Lunar New Year Luncheon at the Senior Center January 24-26 Attended the Cal Cities Mayor’s and Councilmembers Conference January 28 Attended the 5 year anniversary of Grocery Outlet January Attended the Kinder Vision Free Baseball clinic Council Member Constantine
January 17 I participated in the PCTA (Public Cable Television Authority) Meeting as Board

Page 14 ends

Vice Chair at Stanton City Hall Council Chambers, then watched a January HR Webinar Series “A Workshop on Achieving Your New Year Goals” on Zoom, later I met with Shopoff, a local developer in regards to the parcel of land they own at the corner of Euclid and Heil. I saw graphics of a development they are interest to have built there. That evening, I participated in interviews for several for the City’s Commission, Committee, and Boards at City Hall.

January 18 Participated in the monthly Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control Board Meeting at the OC Mosquito and Vector Control District Office in Garden Grove. – January 21st through January 24th:

As the City of Fountain Valley Trustee, and in my 3rd year, for the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District, I attended the 4-day MVAC (Mosquito and Vector Control Association of California) Conference in Monterey with trustees of a few other cities and a few OCMVCD staff. It was the 92nd annual Conference and the theme was “Vector Control in the Modern World”.

The Conference was at the Portola Hotel & Spa at Monterey Bay and adjacent Monterey Conference Center, on Monterey, California. We flew to San Jose, CA at 9 a.m., then drove to Monterey.
-On Sunday, January 21st, there was a Trustee Session from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. - “District Preparedness in Times of Change” that I attended.

Information from various presenters included:
“Jumping in: Engaging with the association as a trustee” “From Aedes to Zika: Vector control in the modern world” “Understanding board member/trustee district liability issues” “Indemnification of directors and employees authority”
“Defense and indemnification of directions and employees - civil actions” “Mitigating director liability - resources and support” For me, this 4 hours of presentations was very beneficial. I am now in my 3rd year as a Trustee (City of Fountain Valley).

In the evening, attended the vendor exhibits and the Presidents Reception at the Monterey Bay Conference Center. As a group, we had dinner at Kona, a local restaurant.
-On January 22nd, attended speaker sessions from 8 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. on this 2nd conference day:
“Morning Plenary Session and Reeves New Investigator Award” “Welcome to the MVCAC Conference” by Conklin Reid, MVCAC President “AMCA update”
“The mosquito crusades: by their deeds you will know them” “A road not traveled - the Africa mosquito/malaria control story” “Cases & faces a VBD clinical primer”
“Getting the public on your team: how to engage the public using social media” “Reeves new investigator - Dengue and chikunguya virus loads in the mosquito Andes a Egypt are determined by distinct genetic architectures”

Page 15 ends

“Effectively engaging a diverse population”
“The crucial role of strong resident-technician relationships in vector control programs”
“What’s the procedure? Taking surveillance date to social media” “Trials and tribulations of language translations for community outreach” “Can you visualize it? Community science data for grades K-8” “The forgotten audience: How improving internal communication can inspire fellow vector control employees”
“Surpassing the static”: Video content increases engagement(s)” “Hands on”: Produce, shoot, and edit great photos and videos in 5 minutes” “3D Printing symposia”
“Introduction to 3D printing”
“Developing a 3D printing program and preliminary results” “A 3D printed vector surveillance trap (VST)”
“Using 3D printing to support programs at Placer Mosquito and Vector Control District“
“A tool to make more tools for mosquito control”
“Using 3D printed tools to streamline mosquito control product evaluations” “Leveraging 3D printing for custom solutions in vector control applications” “3D printing: A gateway to budget-friendly solutions at Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District”
“3D printing at Delta Mosquito and Vector Control District” As a group, we had dinner at Medici Pizza.
-On January 23rd, attended speaker sessions from 8. a.m. to 5 p.m. on this 3rd conference day:
“District preparedness and planning”
‘Methods and challenges of evaluations mosquito control strategies” “Evolution of the OPS application”. Adapting to the modern landscape of mosquito control in the Coachella Valley”
“Surveillance for mosquito-borne Encephalitis Virus activity in California, 2023” “A day in the life of a service request”
“Targeting”. Directing surveillance efforts to optimally deploy control resources” “Incorporating Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) into IPM toolbox to control invasive Andes mosquitoes in the West VAlley region of San Bernardino, California” “Preparing the public for sterile male releases”
“The Southern California SIT joint pilot project update year two: The journey of developing engagement strategies and processes for X-ray sterilized male Aedes egypti releases”
“Moving towards sterile male mosquito mass releases: Fitness assessments of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)
“Mosquito Pool Shipping Conditions”
“Enhancing local preparedness: Mobilizing volunteer resources against local transmission of Aedes-borne disease in Los Angeles County “CalSurv development: New tools for vector control”
“Making use of your data: Decisionmaking and reporting using CalSurv” “Evaluation of the sensitivity and utility of dead bird surveillance for West Nile Virus in Sacramento and Yolo Counties”
“Enhancing public health entomology training”
“The pivotal power of prudence when managing mosquito and vector control money”

Page 16 ends

“AMCA drone program: Removing barriers and encouraging innovation “Using drones for mapping: A brief introduction to the dos and don’ts” “Dispersal drone-related operations: Risk mitigation with other flying objects, people, and property”
“The battle at Big Sur”
“Methods and applications for mosquito larval habitat identification and automated treatments”
“Implementation of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) into Vector Control Program” “Utilizing drones in Contra Costa County to conduct larviciding treatments during an above average rainfall mosquito season”
‘UAS realtime wind speed data collection”
“Local Transmission of Dengue Panel Discussion” with various panelists. This panel summarized the lessons learned from the first local transmission of Dengue in California, emphasizing the importance of ongoing surveillance, community engagement, and global collaboration to prevent and manage emerging infectious diseases in the future.

As a group, we had lunch at Alvarado Street Brewery, then attended the Mosquito and Vector Control of California Conference closing event that evening at the Monterey Bay Aquarium.

January 24 Attended some of the MVCAC (Mosquito and Vector Control Association of California) Board Meeting, we had lunch at Famiglia Medici Poor House Bistro in San Jose, CA, then drove to the airport to catch our flight back to Orange County via Southwest Airlines that evening.

January 25 Watched the “2024 Retail Expansion Outlook: Market Trends and Growth Opportunities” workshop on Zoom, then watched the January ADA Shop Talk Webinar: Voting Locations.

January 26 Stopped by the movie for senior citizens “The Call of the Wild” at Founders Village Community and Senior Center, then watched the replay of the recent Orange County Board of Supervisors Meeting on the County’s website.

January 27 Stopped by the Green Valley Community Shred Event at the Green Valley Family Clubhouse parking lot, then enjoyed a nice lunch and bingo at the Friends of the Fountain Valley Library General Meeting and Birthday Bingo event at the Fountain Valley Library.

January 28 Attended the 5 Years Anniversary Ribbon Cutting Celebration at Grocery Outlet, then attended the Annual Major League Baseball Players Legends Alumni for Youth event at the Fountain Valley Sports Park. Was lots of fun again this year! Council Member Harper
January 17 Attended the ACCOC Board meeting and the Committee / Commission interviews January 18 Attended the Mobile Source Air Pollution reduction meeting January 22 Attended the OCTA Board Meeting
January 24 Attended the OCTA Finance Committee meeting
January 25 Attended the SARFPA meeting
January 28 Attended the 5 year anniversary of Grocery Outlet

Page 17 ends

ADJOURN THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING

AUTHORITY
Mayor Grandis adjourned the meeting at 8:19 pm to the next Meeting of the Fountain Valley City Council on February 20, 2024 at 6:00 p.m., in the Fountain Valley Council Chambers, 10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Glenn Grandis, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Rick Miller, City Clerk

Page 18 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: February 20, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Update for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024.

Three-Year Strategic Goals
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☒ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☒ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☒ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On November 16, 2023 the City Council held a strategic planning session with executive management team and department managers. The Strategic Plan was then presented to City Council at the December 19, 2023 City Council Meeting for adoption. Those that were in attendance collaborated to establish the City’s six-month strategic planning objectives for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024. The strategic plan has and will continue to serve as a guideline for both the Council and City staff as we work to achieve our goals over the next few years. The Strategic Plan goals on the attached spreadsheet have been updated so that the City Council can see the progress that has been made on the action items.

DISCUSSION:

During the City’s Strategic Planning session on November 16, 2023, City Council, executive management team including department managers discussed achievements and missed opportunities.

There were group discussions that led to the creation of the City’s six-month strategic planning objectives. As adopted the vision and mission statements are:

The City of Fountain Valley vision statement is:

Fountain Valley is a safe, inclusive, and desirable community where you can live your best life! The City of Fountain Valley mission statement is:

The City of Fountain Valley is a team driven organization committed to providing excellent service to our community through our Core Values: Fiscal Stability, Honesty, Integrity and Ethical Behavior, Teamwork, Innovation, Quality of Life, and Excellent Customer Service.

Page 19 ends

City of Fountain Valley Strategic Plan
February 20, 2024

Page 2 ends

Through the collaborative efforts, City Council and City staff finalized the six-month strategic objectives matrix for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024 (Attachment No. 1) in support of the new goals for 2023-2026.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The fiscal impact has been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2023-24.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

Attorney for the City has reviewed this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Receive and File the updated strategic objectives matrix for November 16, 2023 through May 23, 2024.

Alternative No. 2: Direct staff to take an alternate action.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1.

Prepared by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Reviewed by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Colin Burns, Attorney for the City
Attachment:

1. Six Month Strategic Objectives Matrix for May 11, 2023 – November 16, 2023

Page 20 ends

C I T Y O F F O U N T A I N V A L L E Y

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
N o v e m b e r 1 6 , 2 0 2 3 – M a y 2 3 , 2 0 2 4
City of Fountain Valley Vision Statement
Fountain Valley is a safe, inclusive, and desirable community where you can live your best life! City of Fountain Valley Mission Statement
The City of Fountain Valley is a team driven organization committed to providing excellent service to our community through our core values.

Core Values
Fiscal Stability, Honesty, Integrity and Ethical Behavior, Teamwork, Innovation, Quality of Life, and Excellent Customer Service THREE-YEAR GOAL: ENHANCE THE CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT OF “A NICE PLACE TO LIVE”

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGET
REVISE
D
BUDGET

1. By March 5,
2024, to City
Manager
Police Chief-lead with Deputy
City Manager/Community
Development Director
Present City’s action plan for the Central Cities
Navigation Center to City Manager. X
N/A On target to present to
CM in March, pending
CCNC has finalized
operational guidelines.

2. By March 19,
2024, City
Council meeting
Community Services Directorlead with Finance Director
and Public Works Director
Create an RFP for Parks Master Plan.

X
$175,00
0 to
$250,00
0 (Park
Funds)

3. By February
20, 2024, City
Council meeting
Public Works Director Present more information on Orange County Power Authority and its program for City Council
consideration.

X N/A Presented to City Council
at the January 30, 2024
Study Session.

Page 21 ends

B
THREE-YEAR GOAL: ACHIEVE FISCAL STABILITY BY EVALUATING PROCESSES, AND ATTRACT

AND RETAIN REVENUE PRODUCING BUSINESSES/OPPORTUNITIES

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGET
REVISE
D
BUDGET

1. By April 2, 2024, City
Council meeting
Finance Director-lead
and Executive
Management Team
Prepare and present the fee study results to City Council for adoption.

X In budget Meeting with
Departments regarding
Fee supported
services

2. By March 19, 2024,
City Council Meeting
Finance Director Present potential amendments languages of the Responsible Spending Pledge with feedback from the
Measure HH Advisory Committee for City Council
consideration.

X N/A Meeting with HH
Committee in early
March

3. By February 20,
2024, City Council
Meeting
Deputy City
Manager/Community
Development Director
Present and prioritize the Economic Development Plan’s
goals and objectives with implementation schedule for
City Council consideration.

X N/A Presenting item to City
Council on February

20. 4. By March 19, 2024,
City Council Meeting
City Attorney-lead
with Finance Director
and City Clerk
Present a potential Transit Occupancy Tax increase
assessment option.

X N/A Gathered surrounding
cities TOT data.

Page 22 ends

C
THREE-YEAR GOAL: ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALITY STAFF THROUGH

BEST PRACTICES AND TRENDS

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGE
T
REVIS
ED
BUDGET

1. By December
19, 2023, city
Council
Meeting
HR Director,
Community Services
Director and
Engagement Team
Present and bring forward top trends in workforce and labor market for approval and adoption.

X N/A Staff received direction
from City Council on a
possible 4/10 pilot
program and profession
development programs
including scholarship
from employees’ family
members.

2. By April 16,
2024, City
Council
meeting
HR Director and
Engagement Team
Based on the December 19, 2023 recommendation on
priorities on workforce top trends, implement City Council direction on professional development, team building
experience and/or work schedule options.

X Need budget The Engagement Team
is working on a high
level 4/10 pilot program
and is conducting a
survey to confirm City
Hall interest to present
information and an
anticipated
implementation plan.

Page 23 ends

D
THREE-YEAR GOAL: MAINTAIN, BUILD, AND MODERNIZE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT

GROWTH AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THE CITY

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGET
REVISE
D
BUDGET

1. By April 16, 2024, City
Council meeting
Public Works Director
and IT Director
Present current and future plans for citywide high speed internet access.

X In
budget
SiFi presented an
update to the City
Council on
January 30, 2024.

A website link to
FV Internet
Providers has
been added to the
City’s website.

Bi-monthly status
updates will be
sent to City
Council.

2. By May 21, 2024, City
Council Meeting
Public Works Director
and Fire Chief
 Finalize the bid process for the demolition and
design phases for the 17101 Bushard property.
 Initiate demolition and start work towards 30% of
design.
 Research Fire Station 1 potential project funding
and ongoing revenue opportunities.

X In
budget
Presented to City
Council on
January 30, 2024.

3. By May 7, 2024, City
Council meeting
IT Director Build, upgrade, and modernize a secure network infrastructure. Starting phase 1.

In
budget
On schedule for
5/7/24. The next
network upgrade
for Routers and
Core is February
13, 2024

4. By February 20,
2024, City Council
meeting
Public Works
Director-lead and
Finance Director
Present to City Council a best practice for a multi-year systematic approach to program and fund building
maintenance needs for City facilities.

X N/A Scheduled for
February 20, 2024

Page 24 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: February 20, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: City of Fountain Valley Register of Demands for the period of 1/20/2024 to 2/9/2024 Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☒ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City ☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Attached is the Register of Demands for the City of Fountain Valley to be ratified by the City Council.

DISCUSSION:

Pursuant to the State of California’s Government Code 37201 through 37210, the Director of Finance or their designated representative hereby certify to the accuracy of the following demands and to the availability of funds for payment thereof. Demands paid by the city shall be inspected and ratified by the legislative body on the next available Council agenda. The Finance Department has prepared the attached Register of Demands summarizing the City's payments released since the previous City Council meeting.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:

The attached Register of Demands represents payments made by the City of Fountain Valley between 1/20/2024 and 2/9/2024 for a total of $2,638,866.36.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City reviewed this staff report and concurs with the recommended action.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

Page 25 ends

Page 2 ends

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Approve the attached Register of Demands.

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve as presented and provide direction to staff.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 to approve the attached Register of Demands representing payments made by the City of Fountain Valley between 1/20/2024 and 2/9/2024 for a total of $2,638,866.36.

Prepared by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Reviewed by: Colin Burns, City Attorney
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachment 1: Register of Demands 1/20/2024 to 2/9/2024.

Page 26 ends

City Of Fountain Valley
Register of Demands
1/20/2024 - 2/9/2024
Department
Check
Date Vendor Description Doc #
Check/ACH
# Amount
10010100 CITY COUNCIL
02/07/24 AMAZON 22112 1563 206.61
206.61
10010102 LEGAL SERVICES
01/31/24 HARPER AND BURNS, LL 22094 1552 11,874.00
11,874.00
10010103 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
01/31/24 TRIPEPI, SMITH & ASS 21425 2309370 240.00
02/07/24 AMAZON 22096 1563 48.33
288.33
10010104 ADMIN SERVICES
01/31/24 AT&T MOBILITY 22114 2309315 50.07
02/06/24 AMAZON 21516 1560 102.95
02/06/24 AMAZON 22213 1560 4,204.28
02/06/24 AMAZON 22080 1560 300.27
01/24/24 AMAZON 22079 1529 4,265.46
02/06/24 AMAZON 21512 1560 34.50
01/24/24 RELIABLE TRANSLATION 21709 2309286 80.00
01/24/24 AMAZON 22078 1529 90.02
01/24/24 TOTAL RECALL CAPTION 22053 2309303 525.00
9,652.55
10010105 RECORDS MANAGEMENT
01/31/24 ORANGE COUNTY REGIST 22115 2309356 2,458.52
2,458.52
10020200 HUMAN RESOURCES
01/24/24 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W 22088 2309254 2,583.00
01/24/24 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W 22089 2309255 6,622.00
01/24/24 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W 22090 2309256 2,067.00
01/24/24 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W 22091 2309257 748.00
01/24/24 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W 22092 2309258 170.00
01/31/24 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC 22173 2309331 147.00
01/31/24 AMAZON 22215 1548 65.16
02/08/24 RETURN TO WORK PARTN
CHAIRS

TOTAL CITY COUNCIL

CITY LEGAL SERVICES

TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES

GENERAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES

OFFICE SUPPLIES

TOTAL OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
ADMIN CELL PHONES 11.27 - 12.26

STATE OF THE CITY SUPPLIES

FILM CAMERA

BACKDROP/EQUIPMENT

VIDEO/LIGHTING EQUIPMENT

OFFICE SUPPLIES

VIETNAMESE MESSAGE TRANSLATION

BACKDROP/EQUIPMENT

CART SERVICES FOR DISABILITY COMMITTEE

TOTAL ADMIN SERVICES
LEGAL NOTICE - DECEMBER 2023

TOTAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT
DECEMBER 2023 CLIENT MATTER FO030-00035
DECEMBER 2023 CLIENT MATTER FO030-00028
DECEMBER 2023 CLIENT MATTER FO030-00001
DECEMBER 2023 CLIENT MATTER FO030-00033
DECEMBER 2023 CLIENT MATTER FO030-00028
DECEMBER 2023 HR PARTIAL PMT
AMAZON INV 1J4V-H6JR-G117 EE AWARDS
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS JOB ANALYSIS 22294 2309427 189.00
02/08/24 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES (1/12/2024) 22325 2309452 231.20 02/08/24 SHRED-IT USA LLC HR DEPT SHRED-IT STERICYCLE 22326 2309463 113.76 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 12,936.12
10030300 PLANNING
02/08/24 RELIABLE TRANSLATION SPANISH/VIETNAMESE TRANSLATION STR 22437 2309426 150.00

Page 27 ends

02/08/24 KOSMONT REALTY SEP'23 - REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES 22337 2309456 3,003.00 02/08/24 RELIABLE TRANSLATION SPANISH TRANSLATION NO. ISLAND RESIDENT 22436 2309426 77.12 02/08/24 KOSMONT REALTY OCT'23 - REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES 22338 2309456 1,409.20 01/24/24 ORANGE COUNTY REGIST ADVERTISEMENTS - DEC-JAN NOTICE 21610 2309262 1,635.06 02/07/24 KLING CONSULTING GRO DEC'23 SOILS RVW CONSULTING SVCS 23-1829 22107 2309387 850.00 02/07/24 KLING CONSULTING GRO DEC'23 SOILS RVW CONSULTING SVCS 23-2254 22108 2309387 850.00 02/07/24 KLING CONSULTING GRO DEC'23 SOILS RVW CONSULTING SVCS 23-1185 22110 2309387 850.00 01/24/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES-CLEANING SUPPLIES -1VQF- 21728 1529 13.68 01/24/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES TECH EQUIPMENT- 1XMG- 21720 1529 71.73 01/24/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNER-1P3H-CHQ9-MRDQ 22082 1529 22.84 01/24/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES-AVERY LABELS-1FHF-H4V7- 22084 1529 11.95 02/08/24 BLDG REFUND CE CITATION DISMISSAL C5000112 17686 22300 2309397 1,500.00 02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/262/25 PLANNING, BLDG, & CDBG CE CELLS & 22365 2309482 123.83 TOTAL PLANNING 10,568.41
10030301 BUILDING & SAFETY
01/31/24 OC SANITATION DISTRI DECEMBER 2023 SEWER CONNECTION 21542 2309355 (482.29) 01/31/24 DEPARTMENT OF CONSER 4TH QTR 2023 SMIP FEES 21550 2309329 (314.09) 02/08/24 BLDG REFUND 80% REFUND FOR BUILDING PERMIT 23-337 22303 2309396 218.40 02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/262/25 PLANNING, BLDG, & CDBG CE CELLS & 22365 2309482 202.56 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY (375.42)
10040400 FINANCE
01/31/24 CSMFO 2024 CSMFO CONFERENCE EVENT 22065 2309327 50.00 01/31/24 CSMFO 2024 CSMFO CONFERENCE EVENT 22066 2309327 50.00 01/31/24 CSMFO 22068 2309327 50.00
01/31/24 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SE
2024 CSMFO CONFERENCE EVENT
COST ALLOCATION & RATE STUDY THRU DEC 22013 2309377 3,834.00 TOTAL FINANCE 3,984.00
10040401 PURCHASING
02/08/24 OFFICE DEPOT PAPER ORDER - SENIOR CENTER (2 CT) 22358 2309458 86.76 TOTAL PURCHASING 86.76
10050500 ENGINEERING
02/08/24 CANON SOLUTIONS AMER NOV'23 - PLOTTER/SCANNER MAINT AND 22393 2309450 358.16 01/24/24 AMAZON CREDIT AMAZON INVOICE 1XNH-6CV9-4PHD 21609 1529 (203.32) 02/08/24 CANON SOLUTIONS AMER DEC'23 - PLOTTER/SCANNER MAINT AND 22394 2309450 358.16 01/31/24 AT&T MOBILITY CELL PHONE 11/27/23-12/26/23 TG, KK, KH, SS 22025 2309314 181.64 02/08/24 CANON SOLUTIONS AMER JAN'24 - PLOTTER/SCANNER MAINT AND 22395 2309450 358.16 02/08/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE 01/03/24 22389 2309479 852.91 02/08/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE 01/08/24 22390 2309479 1,077.36 02/08/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE 01/16/24 22391 2309479 1,054.92 02/08/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE 01/22/24 22392 2309479 1,077.36 02/08/24 CANON SOLUTIONS AMER FEB'24 - PLOTTER/SCANNER MAINT AND 22396 2309450 358.16 TOTAL ENGINEERING 5,473.51
10050503 STREET LIGHTING
01/24/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO STREET LIGHTS 12/1 - 12/31/23 21678 2309293 9,226.93 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING 9,226.93
10050550 RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Page 28 ends

01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 3.78 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 3.78 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 3.78 01/24/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR BACKFLOW REPAIR 21749 2309251 120.43 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 3.78 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 3.78 02/08/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S IRRIGATION PARTS FOR STOCK-MEDIANS 22237 2309413 695.05 02/08/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S ROW IRRIGATION-STOCK 22241 2309414 124.28 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 3.78 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO ROW - JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24) 22421 2309469 83.51 TOTAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY 1,045.95
10050551 TREE MAINTENANCE
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 3.20 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 3.20 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 3.20 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 177.63 02/08/24 KIRBY BUILT MONUMENT BENCH PURCHASED BY C.S. 22308 2309417 1,461.34 01/24/24 G&G TROPHY PLAQUE FOR TREE MONUMENT 22023 2309247 364.24 01/31/24 MONROE PACIFIC WHOLE PARKWAY TREES-STOCK 22157 2309351 215.50 01/31/24 KIRBY BUILT BENCH PLAQUE PURCHASED BY C. S. 22163 2309342 187.36 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 3.62 02/08/24 A.Y. NURSERY PARKWAY TREE REPLACEMENTS-JAN 2024 22242 2309391 1,125.56 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 21.66 TOTAL TREE MAINTENANCE 3,566.51
10050552 PARK MAINTENANCE
01/24/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S TOOLS FOR TRUCKS 304, 239, 221 21748 2309250 274.32 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 3.20 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 3.20 01/31/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE PARKS LANDSCAPE MAINT DEC 2023 22151 2309348 19,096.80 01/31/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE CIVIC FAC. LANDSCAPE DEC 2023 22153 2309349 2,940.03 01/31/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SENIOR CENTER EXTRA WORK-PLANT 22155 2309350 2,750.00 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 3.20 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 3.20 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 3.20 01/24/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO MCDOWELL PARK (12/19/23-1/18/24) 22067 2309295 31.48 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 3.20 02/08/24 MONROE PACIFIC WHOLE PLANT MATERIAL FOR CITY HALL PARKING LOT 22244 2309419 2,020.31 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO IRRIGATION/PARKS SCE - JAN (12/28/23-1/28/24) 22410 2309464 665.05 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO NIEBLAS PARK - JAN (1/5/24-2/4/24) 22413 2309466 24.84 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 27,822.03
10050553 CONCRETE MAINTENANCE
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 4.04 01/24/24 AT&T MOBILITY CELLS, TABLETS, IPADS 21760 2309232 100.00 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 4.04 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 4.04

Page 29 ends

01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 4.04 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 4.04 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 4.04 TOTAL CONCRETE MAINTENANCE 124.24
10050554 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 16.14 01/24/24 AT&T MOBILITY CELLS, TABLETS, IPADS 21760 2309232 75.58 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 16.14 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 16.14 01/31/24 UNITED RENTALS NORTH PROPANE 8512-PATCH TRUCK 22160 2309372 81.81 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 16.14 01/24/24 VULCAN MATERIAL COMP UTILITY REPAIRS 22086 2309310 515.65 01/31/24 VULCAN MATERIAL COMP SINK HOLE REPAIR-9270 LILY AVE 22161 2309376 681.70 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 16.14 02/08/24 VULCAN MATERIAL COMP UTILITY REPAIR-11594 COLEY RIVER 22370 2309483 780.01 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 16.14 TOTAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 2,231.59
10050555 STORM DRAIN MAINT
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 3.63 02/08/24 RED WING BUSINESS AD SAFETY BOOTS-R.W. 22409 2309461 215.00 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 46.23 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 3.20 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 3.20 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 3.20 01/31/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO SANDALWOOD PUMP STATION SCE (12/15/23- 22071 2309361 543.13 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 3.20 02/07/24 SO CALIF GAS CO WALNUT PUMP STATION JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24 22372 2309382 95.40 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO SANDALWOOD PUMP STATION -JAN (1/5/24- 22403 2309474 47.54 TOTAL STORM DRAIN MAINT 963.73
10050556 TRAFFIC CONTROL
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 6.82 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 6.82 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 6.82 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 6.82 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 6.82 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 6.82 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONTROL 40.92
10050558 RECREATION CENTER
02/08/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE NOV'23 - SP LANDSCAPE MAINT 22306 2309418 35,889.48 02/08/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE NOV'23 - SP EXTRA WORK-MAINLINE BY FIELD 22307 2309418 720.00 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 6.81 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 6.81 02/08/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE DEC'23 - SP LANDSCAPE MAINT 22234 2309418 35,889.48 02/08/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE DEC'23 SP EXTRA WORK - MAINLINE BREAK 22235 2309418 1,376.00 01/24/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR SPORTS PARK 21750 2309252 96.51

Page 30 ends

01/24/24 GRAINGER, INC. ORANGE FENCE AND AIP TIES ALONG DG 21745 2309248 365.16 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 6.81 02/08/24 ALAN'S LAWNMOWER & G WATER JUGS TO COMPLY WITH OSHA 22310 2309392 225.03 01/24/24 RESOURCE BUILDING MA SAIL MIX FOR STOCK PILE @ SPORTS PARK 21747 2309287 120.46 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 6.81 02/08/24 RED WING BUSINESS AD SAFETY BOOTS AND INSOLES-T.V. 22246 2309425 215.00 01/24/24 SAKIOKA WHOLESALE NU PLANT MATERIAL - ISLAND PLANTER IN FRONT

21746 2309292 54.95
01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 6.81 02/08/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S IRRIGATOON SUPPLIES FOR SP 22309 2309415 815.56 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 6.81 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER 75,808.49
10050559 GRAFFITI CONTROL
01/31/24 VISTA PAINT CORP GRAFFITI REMOVER AND BRUSHES 22162 2309375 201.08 TOTAL GRAFFITI CONTROL 201.08
10060600 FIRE SUPPRESSION
01/31/24 AT&T MOBILITY FIRE CELL PHONES - 12.9.23 - 1.8.24 22187 2309317 185.31 01/31/24 AT&T MOBILITY FIRE BACK UP CELLS - 12.9.23 - 1.8.24 22189 2309318 120.72 01/31/24 CITY OF HUNTINGTON B AGREEMENT FIRE DEPT. TRAINING FACILITY - 22177 2309324 12,586.00 TOTAL FIRE SUPPRESSION 12,892.03
10060602 AMBULANCE SERVICES
01/31/24 CARE AMBULANCE AMBULANCE SERVICES SURGE FOR 22174 1550 31,312.50 01/31/24 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22178 2309321 543.54 01/31/24 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22179 2309321 297.90 01/31/24 MCKESSON MEDICAL-SUR MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22184 1555 124.94 01/31/24 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES, AMBULANCE BILLING SERVICES - DECEMBER 22186 1558 13,843.00 01/31/24 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22210 2309321 427.69 01/31/24 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22181 2309346 218.00 01/31/24 TURNOUT MAINTENANCE MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22185 2309371 154.00 01/31/24 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 22209 2309346 755.02 01/31/24 CARE AMBULANCE AMBULANCE SERVICES OT PAY PERIOD 23-25 22176 1550 275.76 TOTAL AMBULANCE SERVICES 47,952.35
10060603 FIRE PREVENTION
01/31/24 AT&T MOBILITY FIRE CELL PHONES - 12.9.23 - 1.8.24 22187 2309317 45.07 TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION 45.07
10070700 PATROL
01/31/24 AMAZON RETURN OF I-PAD CASE - CHIEF 22138 1544 (27.18) 01/24/24 VERIZON WIRELESS DEPARTMENT CELL PHONES 12/26-1/25/24 21602 2309309 1,220.48 01/31/24 AT&T MOBILITY DEPARTMENT CELL PHONES - 11/27-12/26/23 22130 2309316 280.26 01/31/24 CITY NET OUTREACH SERVICES - DECEMBER 2023 22134 2309323 26,753.02 02/08/24 GALLS, LLC C. GARCIA NAMEPLATE 22318 2309455 11.20 02/08/24 GALLS, LLC RECRUIT HERELD NAMEPLATE 22319 2309455 11.20 01/31/24 L.N. CURTIS & SONS RECRUIT HERALD ACADEMY SUPPLIES 22139 2309343 194.21 01/31/24 L.N. CURTIS & SONS RECRUIT C. GARCIA ACADEMY SUPPLIES 22140 2309343 180.55 01/31/24 GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE POLICE ACADEMY FEES - J. HERELD 22141 2309339 2,304.00 01/31/24 G & W TOWING TOW FEES - 1/19/24 (DALE) 22145 2309337 90.00

Page 31 ends

02/08/24 RIO HONDO REGIONAL T TUITION - ZANE/RODRIGUEZ SUPERVISORY 22314 2309462 456.00 01/31/24 ZANE, JOSEPH MEALS/MILEAGE SUPERVISORY SCHOOL 1/2- 22146 1559 413.91 01/31/24 AMAZON ROLLING CLOTHES ORGANIZER 22147 1544 29.21 02/08/24 PREMIER UNIFORMS RECRUIT HERELD & C. GARCIA ACADEMY 22316 2309460 1,062.40 02/08/24 PREMIER UNIFORMS BREAST CANCER PATCHES 22317 2309460 553.36 02/08/24 HUGHES, WILLIAM HOTEL/MEALS SLI 1/18/-1/20/24 22191 1578 581.61 TOTAL PATROL 34,114.23
10070701 INVESTIGATION
01/31/24 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLIC RECORD SEARCHES - DECEMBER 2023 22132 2309368 584.18 01/31/24 COUNTY OF ORANGE AFIS - JANUARY 2024 22128 2309326 2,052.00 01/31/24 EFFICIENT X-RAY, INC BIOHAZARD WASTE PICKUP 22133 2309333 65.00 01/31/24 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC PARTIAL PAYMENT OF PD LIVE SCAN FEES - 22143 2309330 477.00 02/08/24 AMAZON RECRUITMENT - 3-RING BINDERS 22320 1576 77.82 TOTAL INVESTIGATION 3,256.00
10070702 TRAFFIC
02/08/24 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CROSSING GUARDS - 1/7/24-1/20/24 22311 1575 9,567.54 02/08/24 MOSHER, BRIAN REIMBURSE FOR DUI CHECKPOINT FOOD 22313 1581 201.53 TOTAL TRAFFIC 9,769.07
10070703 CANINE
01/31/24 VCA WEST COAST SPECI KP POMIX MED SERVICES - 1/16/24 22142 2309373 1,009.20 TOTAL CANINE 1,009.20
10070705 L.E. COMMUNICATIONS
02/08/24 SPARKLETTS PD WATER DELIVERY - 1/3/24 & 1/17/24 22312 2309478 328.47 TOTAL L.E. COMMUNICATIONS 328.47
10070707 CRIME PREVENTION
01/31/24 THE PIN CENTER RACES & RSVP PINS 22137 2309365 230.67 01/31/24 AMAZON HP TONER CARTRIDGE - 17WM-M441-VX3D 22129 1544 65.24 02/08/24 FV RACES REIMBURSE FOR UNIFORMS PURCHASED 22399 2309454 278.16 TOTAL CRIME PREVENTION 574.07
10070708 RANGE
01/31/24 CITY OF WESTMINSTER RANGE - 12/13, 12/20, 12/29 22135 2309325 1,209.00 01/31/24 ADKINS, BERTRUM A. RANGEMASTER - JANUARY 2024 22144 1543 875.00 TOTAL RANGE 2,084.00
10080800 RECREATION CENTER
02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON BILL REC CENTER 12-2-23 - 1-1-24 22225 2309449 45.02 02/08/24 VERMONT SYSTEMS INC. VSI - REMOTE TRAINING 22302 1584 87.50 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER 132.52
10080801 ATHLETICS
01/24/24 D&B UMPIRES Adult Softball League Umpires (14) Games 21763 2309241 504.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22026 2309280 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22028 2309268 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22029 2309264 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22030 2309270 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22031 2309266 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22033 2309277 80.00

Page 32 ends

01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22034 2309269 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22035 2309281 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22036 2309271 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22038 2309284 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22039 2309267 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22041 2309276 160.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22042 2309273 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22043 2309272 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22044 2309278 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22046 2309279 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22047 2309275 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22049 2309274 80.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND NO LONGER HOSTING DIVISION C YBKB 22050 2309283 80.00 02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON BILL REC CENTER 12-2-23 - 1-1-24 22225 2309449 37.64 02/08/24 SCMAF - ORANGE COUNT (10) SCMAF Memberships for 2024 22290 2309432 390.00 TOTAL ATHLETICS 2,531.64
10080802 FIELD OPERATIONS
01/24/24 SONRISE ELECTRIC INC Inspection and repairs of scoreboards 3 & 4 21764 2309296 430.00 TOTAL FIELD OPERATIONS 430.00
10080810 SENIOR & COMM CENTER
01/24/24 AMAZON REFUND FOR SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 1FKV- 21729 1529 (16.29) 02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS SENIOR CENTER CELL 1/2-2/1/24 22289 2309448 136.35 01/24/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 1G3Y-TYCY-4GJ4 21738 1529 10.17 01/24/24 S.C. GYM REPAIR SC FITNESS ROOM MONTHLY SERVICE & 22051 2309291 244.81 01/24/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 1JGR-3MM1-QVKV 22054 1529 170.02 01/24/24 AMAZON FILE FOLDER & CARAFE 19JX-3VFC-C7HN 21740 1529 27.71 01/24/24 AMAZON REFUND FOR SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 1KQX- 21731 1529 (23.61) 01/24/24 LEI JES CATERING CATERING FOR LUNCH & LEARN 21756 1537 466.55 01/24/24 AMAZON SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 1T1N-3J6L-RJJF 22055 1529 10.86 01/31/24 BLDG REFUND REFUND FOR RENTAL ON DECEMBER 6, 2023 22098 2309320 25.00 02/08/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES - COFFEE 22214 1576 30.48 01/31/24 LEI JES CATERING CATERING FOR LUNAR NEW YEAR LUNCHEON 22148 1554 1,170.97 02/08/24 THUY VAN DANCE COMPA ENTERTAINMENT FOR LUNAR NEW YEAR 22275 2309445 200.00 02/08/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES - BATTERIES/FOIL 22349 1576 30.26 02/08/24 BLDG REFUND REFUND FOR BUILDING RENTAL ON 6/30/24 22299 2309398 200.00 02/08/24 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCT SC HELIUM TANK RENTAL - JANUARY 22446 2309488 12.50 TOTAL SENIOR & COMM CENTER 2,695.78
10080811 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION
01/24/24 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CA SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES - DEC 22060 2309235 6,029.50 01/31/24 4IMPRINT, INC ADVERTISING FOR SENIOR MOBILITY 22171 2309311 1,072.45 TOTAL SENIOR TRANSPORTATION 7,101.95
10080820 CONTRACT CLASSES
01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 321200-A1 21767 2309282 246.00 01/24/24 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 312210-A1 22106 2309265 61.00 01/31/24 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 321093-A1 22201 2309357 192.38

Page 33 ends

02/08/24 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR SOCCER 1 22223 2309423 166.00 02/08/24 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR ZUMBA GOLD 22274 2309400 72.00 02/08/24 WEST GROVE VOLLEYBAL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 22276 1585 218.23 02/08/24 QUANTUM SIGNS & GRAP BANNERS - LUNAR NEW YEAR FESTIVAL 22279 2309422 821.06 02/08/24 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR LINE DANCING 2/3 22281 2309403 42.37 02/08/24 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR LINE DANCING 2/3 22282 2309401 32.37 02/08/24 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR INTEGRAL TAI CHI II 22283 2309402 10.00 02/08/24 THE RINKS WESTMINSTE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 22433 1583 409.50 TOTAL CONTRACT CLASSES 2,270.91
10080821 SPECIAL EVENTS
02/08/24 FUN EXPRESS, LLC LUNAR NEW YEAR SUPPLIES 22381 2309453 109.04 02/08/24 FUN EXPRESS, LLC EASTER EGG FILLERS 22384 2309453 651.88 TOTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 760.92
10080822 ANNUAL EVENTS
01/31/24 BEARCOM RADIOS FOR SUMMERFEST 22172 2309319 757.24 TOTAL ANNUAL EVENTS 757.24
10080823 PARK PATROL
02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON BILL REC CENTER 12-2-23 - 1-1-24 22225 2309449 51.32 TOTAL PARK PATROL 51.32
10093001 GENERAL FUND
01/31/24 THE PLANNING CENTER GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OCT 23 22165 2309366 16,502.50 01/31/24 THE PLANNING CENTER GENERAL PLAN UPDATE - NOV 23 22169 2309366 9,106.25 01/24/24 THE PLANNING CENTER GENERAL PLAN UPDATE-DECEMBER 2023 21742 2309302 1,340.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 26,948.75
10095000 GENERAL FUND
02/08/24 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE DEC'23 SOD AND TOP SOIL FOR FIELD 22236 2309418 21,275.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 21,275.00
10097000 GF PROJ RECURRING
01/31/24 COUNTY OF ORANGE 800 MHZ AGREEMENT 1/1/24-3/31/24 22131 2309326 32,329.00 TOTAL GF PROJ RECURRING 32,329.00
11010050 ISF IS ADMIN CAPITAL
01/24/24 GOVINVEST, INC ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION - GOVINVEST 22022 1536 30,000.00 01/24/24 AMAZON APC REPLACEMENT BATTERY CARTRIDGE (1) 21363 1529 615.50 01/31/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP SERVICE - D. P. 12/24/23 21239 2309364 1,640.00 01/31/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP SERVICE - D. Z. 12/24/23 21241 2309364 3,200.00 01/31/24 CIVIC PLUS, LLC CIVICENGAGE ANNUAL FEE 21661 1551 1,604.11 01/31/24 LENOVO INC LENOVO DESKTOP TC M75S 21234 2309345 1,489.88 01/24/24 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO SPECTRUM ENTERPRISE DIGITAL BOXES 12/1 - 21595 2309236 167.73 02/07/24 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT M9483-01 OVERAGE 12/1 - 21668 2309378 129.36 02/06/24 AMAZON CISCO ETHERNET MODULE AND 10GTEK 21337 1560 1,397.77 02/06/24 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTO MICROSOFT 365 E3 - SUBSCRIPTION 21459 1561 147,926.06 02/07/24 NMK CORPORATION NMK CORE MIGRATION AND TMC 21464 2309381 2,700.00 02/07/24 AMAZON HP 201A TONER CARTRIDGES (4 PACK) 21518 1563 358.96 02/07/24 AMAZON USB TO USB C ADAPTER PACK 21519 1563 10.32 02/07/24 AMAZON HP 401A TONER CARTRIDGES 21547 1563 388.12

Page 34 ends

01/31/24 TPX COMMUNICATIONS TPX MAIN CITY PH LINE 12/9-1/8/24 22105 2309369 4,678.54 02/07/24 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT 41585-01 OVERAGE 12/6 - 1/5/2024 21667 2309383 74.40 02/07/24 LENOVO INC LENOVO TP DOCK 21662 2309380 591.58 02/07/24 LENOVO INC LENOVO THINKPAD X1 CARBON LAPTOPS 22045 2309388 2,581.46 02/07/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP STAFFING - C. M. PE1/21/24 22217 2309390 1,271.70 02/07/24 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP STAFFING - D. P. PE 1/21/24 22218 2309390 1,148.00 02/07/24 IMGB SOLUTIONS EXCHANGE SERVER SUPPORT 22232 2309386 1,400.00 02/08/24 CMS SOLUTIONS NEC SV9100 CP20 CPU REPLACEMENT 22324 2309451 2,773.13 TOTAL ISF IS ADMIN CAPITAL 206,146.62
11010104 ISF IS
01/24/24 AT&T MOBILITY AT&T IT CELL PHONES 11/27 - 12/26/23 21601 2309231 75.08 TOTAL ISF IS 75.08
11094001 ISF IS FINANCE PRJ NON-REC
02/08/24 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES HCM - IMP 12/28/23 C ROBINS 22346 2309480 1,400.00 02/08/24 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP-HCM 12/19 ROBINS & 12/27 ABRAHAM 22348 2309480 3,200.00 02/08/24 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP-HCM 1/8, 1/9, 1/10, &1/11/24 ABRAHAM 22350 2309480 6,400.00 02/08/24 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP-MUNIS MIG - 1/5/24 ROBINS 22351 2309480 1,400.00 TOTAL ISF IS FINANCE PRJ NON-REC 12,400.00
11110000 ISF GB CITY HALL
01/24/24 TRICOM FIRE & ELECTR INSPECTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS AT ALL 22097 2309304 245.00 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. USED BATTERY COLLECTION TUBES 22264 2309412 445.17 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE CREDIT FIX PO #240045 -NOV 21481 2309332 (106.07) 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND OCT. 21482 2309332 106.07 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND NOV. 21483 2309332 106.07 01/24/24 PRINGLES DRAPERIES NEW SHADE FOR WINDOW 22103 2309263 324.79 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 10.30 01/24/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER T-1 METRO NET 12/25 - 1/24/24 21491 2309242 718.10 01/24/24 AT&T MOBILITY CELLS, TABLETS, IPADS 21760 2309232 210.78 01/24/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER EOC LINES 12/28 - 1/27/24 21726 2309246 532.53 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 10.30 01/31/24 VERIZON SELECT SERVI LD SELECT 11/30 - 12/29/23 21727 2309374 12.58 01/24/24 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY EXTRA KEYS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL RM 22099 2309253 59.91 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 10.30 02/08/24 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC REPAIR CITY HALL 12-5-23 22249 2309421 1,192.00 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 10.30 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 10.30 02/08/24 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY CITY HALL - KEYS 22256 2309416 79.30 02/08/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN JAN'24 - PEST CONTROL CH 22269 2309429 76.00 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 46.22 02/08/24 THE TINT PROS INSTALLED WINDOW FILM FOR POD CAST AREA 22258 2309444 500.00 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO CITY HALL GAS JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24) 22377 2309471 938.70 TOTAL ISF GB CITY HALL 5,538.65
11150000 ISF GB CITY YARD
02/08/24 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERV ANNUAL ELEVATOR TESTING 22285 2309394 1,650.00 01/24/24 TRICOM FIRE & ELECTR INSPECTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS AT ALL 22097 2309304 245.00

Page 35 ends

01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE CREDIT FIX PO #240045 -NOV 21481 2309332 (87.51) 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND OCT. 21482 2309332 87.51 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND NOV. 21483 2309332 87.51 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. BAY HEATER PART 22259 2309407 77.61 01/24/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN MONTHLY PEST CONTROL 22100 2309288 149.00 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. BATTERIES FOR STOCK 22262 2309410 49.36 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO CITY YARD JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24_ 22415 2309467 3,018.62 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO CITY YARD GAS JAN (1/5/24-2/2/24) 22404 2309475 318.63 TOTAL ISF GB CITY YARD 5,595.73
11160001 ISF GB FS1
02/07/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FS#1 PHONE 1/13 - 2/12/24 22227 2309385 203.86 01/24/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN MONTHLY PEST CONTROL 22101 2309289 85.00 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. BOLLARD COVERS 22260 2309408 108.74 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. BOLLARD COVERS FD 1-2 22261 2309409 803.98 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO FS #1-JAN (12/28/23-1/28) 22304 2309440 1,242.12 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO FS #1 GAS JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24) 22378 2309472 691.43 TOTAL ISF GB FS1 3,135.13
11160002 ISF GB FS2
01/24/24 TRICOM FIRE & ELECTR INSPECTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS AT ALL 22097 2309304 245.00 01/31/24 AT&T AT&T FS#2 CKT METRO 11/20 - 12/19/2023 21486 2309313 58.10 01/31/24 AT&T AT&T FS#2 & CY PH LINES 11/22 - 12/21/23 21488 2309313 30.47 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO FS #2 JAN (12/20/23-1/21/24) 22293 2309439 610.43 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO FS #2 JAN (1/5/24-2/2/24) 22405 2309476 363.58 TOTAL ISF GB FS2 1,307.58
11170000 ISF GB POLICE DEPARTMENT
01/24/24 TRICOM FIRE & ELECTR INSPECTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS AT ALL 22097 2309304 245.00 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE CREDIT FIX PO #240045 -NOV 21481 2309332 (227.16) 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND OCT. 21482 2309332 227.16 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND NOV. 21483 2309332 227.16 01/24/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER PD DISPATCH FAX 12/13 - 1/12/24 21604 2309244 112.83 01/24/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER CENTRA NET TO 911 12/28 - 1/27/24 21544 2309243 309.53 01/24/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER PD DISPATCH 12/28 - 1/27/24 21725 2309245 406.36 01/31/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER JAIL PHONE 1/7 - 2/6/24 22104 2309336 144.39 02/08/24 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC REPAIR PD 11-30-23 22250 2309421 4,483.00 02/08/24 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC REPAIR PD 12-7-23 22251 2309421 1,192.00 02/07/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI PD DISPATCH FAX 1/13 - 2/12/24 22226 2309384 113.10 02/08/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN JAN'24 - PEST CONTROL 22268 2309428 112.00 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO PD GAS JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24) 22373 2309470 1,256.64 TOTAL ISF GB POLICE DEPARTMENT 8,602.01
11180000 ISF GB REC CENTER
01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE CREDIT FIX PO #240045 -NOV 21481 2309332 (460.79) 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND OCT. 21482 2309332 460.79 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND NOV. 21483 2309332 460.79 02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. TOILET PARTS FOR PARK RESTROOMS 22266 2309434 69.59 02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. PLUMBING PARTS FOR PARK RESTROOMS 22267 2309435 118.30

Page 36 ends

02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. TOOL FOR SPECIAL URINAL 22263 2309411 18.44 02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. FAUCETS FOR PARK RESTROOMS 22265 2309433 359.05 02/08/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN JAN'24 - PEST CONTROL SPORTS PARK 22270 2309430 184.00 02/08/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN JAN'24 PEST CONTROL REC CNTR 22271 2309431 86.00 02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. FIELD 14 RESTROOMS PLUMBING PARTS 22284 2309437 62.20 02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. PLUMBING PART FOR PARK RESTROOMS 22272 2309436 28.49 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO SPORTS PARK JAN (12/29/23-1/29/24) 22411 2309465 19.11 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO MAINT BLNG - JAN (12/29/23-1/29/24) 22419 2309468 17.87 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO REC CENTER JAN (1/5/24-2/2/24) 22406 2309477 815.34 TOTAL ISF GB REC CENTER 2,239.18
11180001 ISF GB SR CENTER
01/24/24 TRICOM FIRE & ELECTR INSPECTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS AT ALL 22097 2309304 245.00 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE CREDIT FIX PO #240045 -NOV 21481 2309332 (165.38) 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND OCT. 21482 2309332 165.38 01/31/24 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 AMEND NOV. 21483 2309332 165.38 02/08/24 AR INDUSTRIES MAIN DOOR REPAIR - SENIOR CNTR 22273 2309395 2,205.98 01/31/24 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FRONTIER SC ELEV/FIRE LN 1/4 - 2/3/24 22014 2309335 314.24 01/24/24 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN MONTHLY PEST CONTROL 22102 2309290 137.00 02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO SENIOR CENTER-JAN (12/28/23-1/28/24) 22305 2309441 1,315.09 02/08/24 SO CALIF GAS CO SENIOR CENTER GAS JAN (1/4/24-2/1/24) 22379 2309473 644.33 TOTAL ISF GB SR CENTER 5,027.02
11250001 PW - FLEET MGMT
01/31/24 ALAN'S LAWNMOWER & G BATTERY FOR GENERATOR HONDA 22207 2309312 103.88 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 68.53 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 68.53 01/31/24 MCPEEK DODGE OF ANAH UNIT 404 PARTS 22200 2309347 254.54 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 68.53 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 68.53 01/31/24 MCPEEK DODGE OF ANAH UNIT 330 BCM REFLASH 22202 2309347 220.00 01/31/24 GARDEN GROVE HYUNDAI BATTERY FOR UNIT 309 22204 2309338 120.53 01/31/24 RON TURLEY ASSOCIATE RTA FLEET SOFTWARE QUARTELY 22208 2309359 1,980.00 01/31/24 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 22195 2309358 7.03 01/31/24 DANIEL'S TIRE SERVIC STOCK TIRES 22199 2309328 1,424.59 01/31/24 MCPEEK DODGE OF ANAH UNIT 331 BCM REFLASH 22203 2309347 220.00 01/31/24 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY FOR UNIT 197 22205 2309334 122.05 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 68.53 01/31/24 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 22196 2309358 462.02 01/31/24 SPECIALISTS AUTOGLAS WINDSHIELD FOR UNIT 136 22194 2309362 266.00 01/31/24 LD SMOG & REPAIR INC ANNUAL SMOG INSPECTION 22197 2309344 975.60 01/31/24 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS PART FOR UNIT 272 22206 2309334 151.41 01/31/24 THEODORE ROBINS FORD PART FOR UNIT 272 22198 2309367 702.14 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 68.53 TOTAL PW - FLEET MGMT 7,420.97
11350053 ISF EQ PW R&C CAPITAL
01/24/24 AMAZON HAND VACUUMS 1RJL-LNK4-CVP9 22087 1530 345.90

Page 37 ends

TOTAL ISF EQ PW R&C CAPITAL 345.90
11400400 SELF INSURANCE
02/07/24 BROWN & BROWN OF CAL WORKERS COMPENSATION 22/23 AUDIT 22371 2309379 14,325.00 01/31/24 ATHENS ADMINISTRATOR ATHENS PREFUND CLAIM REQUEST 009 22183 1549 84,259.22 02/07/24 ATHENS ADMINISTRATOR REPLENISHMENT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 01/1/24 22280 1574 142,685.96 TOTAL SELF INSURANCE 241,270.18
11400411 SELF INSURANCE
02/08/24 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPME ACCT #932-0092-1 UNEMP BENEFITS(10/1/23 - 22444 2309485 5,132.10 02/08/24 HARPER AND BURNS, LL DEC'23 CLAIMS LITIGATION 22095 1577 9,730.89 01/31/24 NUYEN, LANIE CLAIM SETTLEMENT FOR CLAIM 23-22 22032 2309354 9,500.00 TOTAL SELF INSURANCE 24,362.99
11400430 SELF INSURANCE
02/08/24 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL 02/01/24-02/29/2024 - LIFE 22286 2309443 3,347.33 02/08/24 MYERS-STEVENS & TOOH MARCH 2024 PORAC LTD (ACCT 54541) 22298 2309420 1,455.30 TOTAL SELF INSURANCE 4,802.63
11500000 ISF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01/24/24 AFLAC JANUARY 2024 AFLAC ACCT HH049 22012 2309229 3,628.92 01/24/24 STANDARD INSURANCE C 2401_VISION_ACTIVE (010124 - 013124) 22069 2309298 2,410.82 01/24/24 STANDARD INSURANCE C 2401_VISION_COBRA (010124 - 013124) 22070 2309299 65.92 01/31/24 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO FEBRUARY 2024 DELTA DENTAL 22149 2309352 11,524.17 01/31/24 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO FEBRUARY 2024 DELTACARE HMO 22150 2309353 2,157.52 01/24/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY POLI PR PPE 011924 DPD DEDUCTIONS 22117 1534 2,450.00 01/24/24 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOY PR PPE 011924 DPT & DYD DEDUCTIONS 22118 1541 375.65 01/24/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CRED PR PPE 011924 CU DEDUCTIONS 22119 1531 44,606.60 01/24/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FIRE PR PPE 011924 DFR DEDUCTIONS 22120 1532 2,727.64 01/24/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY GENE PR PPE 011924 DGE DEDUCTIONS 22121 1533 494.00 01/24/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P PLAN#803216-PPE 011924 RHF & RHS 22122 1538 2,530.60 01/24/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P PLAN# 800389 RHA & RHC DEDUCTIONS 22123 1539 1,161.33 01/24/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P PLAN# 800414 RHM DEDUCTIONS 22124 1540 203.54 01/24/24 U.S. BANK N.A. PR PPE 011924 PAR & PRE DEDUCTIONS 22125 1542 2,725.97 01/24/24 FVPOA PAC PR PPE 011924 POL DEDUCTIONS 22126 1535 525.00 02/08/24 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL 02/01/24-02/29/2024 - LIFE 22286 2309443 1,543.45 02/07/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY POLI PR PPE 020224 DPD DEDUCTIONS 22422 1567 2,400.00 02/07/24 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOY PR PPE 020224 DPT & DYD DEDUCTIONS 22423 1572 375.65 02/07/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CRED PR PPE 020224 CU DEDUCTIONS 22424 1564 44,947.60 02/07/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FIRE PR PPE 020224 DFR DEDUCTIONS 22425 1565 2,727.64 02/07/24 FOUNTAIN VALLEY GENE PR PPE 020224 DGE DEDUCTIONS 22426 1566 494.00 02/07/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P PLAN #803216-PPE 020224 RHF & RHS 22427 1569 2,480.60 02/07/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P PLAN #800389 RAH & RHC DEDUCTIONS 22428 1570 1,161.33 02/07/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P PLAN # 800414 - RHM DEDUCTIONS 22429 1571 203.54 02/07/24 U.S. BANK N.A. PR PPE 020224 PAR & PRE DEDUCTIONS 22430 1573 3,067.48 02/07/24 FVPOA PAC PR PPE 020224 POL DEDUCTIONS 22431 1568 510.00 TOTAL ISF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 137,498.97
11500450 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02/08/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P 10/01/23 - 12/31/23 - PLAN 803210 QTRLY RHS 22340 1580 1,006.25

Page 38 ends

01/31/24 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO FEBRUARY 2024 DELTA DENTAL 22149 2309352 10,822.86 01/31/24 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO FEBRUARY 2024 DELTACARE HMO 22150 2309353 510.10 01/31/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P MS PLAN #803210-RETIREE REIMB MARCH 2024 22222 1556 133,277.80 02/08/24 MISSION SQUARE RET P 01/01 - 3/31/24 - PLAN #106082 QTRLY FEE 22339 1579 125.00 TOTAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 145,742.01
23030310 CDBG CODE ENFORCEMENT
02/08/24 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/262/25 PLANNING, BLDG, & CDBG CE CELLS & 22365 2309482 79.92 TOTAL CDBG CODE ENFORCEMENT 79.92
23030315 CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE
01/24/24 BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS O PSA SUB-RECIPIENT GRANT PER 23-24 ACTION 22024 2309234 2,419.00 TOTAL CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE 2,419.00
23130320 FVHA 1ST TIME HOMEBUYER
02/08/24 AMERINAT 2024 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOAN PORTFOLIO 22255 2309393 9,000.00 02/08/24 AMERINAT 2024 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LPU/LDP SERVICE 22257 2309393 4,500.00 TOTAL FVHA 1ST TIME HOMEBUYER 13,500.00
30095300 CAPITAL IMP - FACILITIES
02/08/24 PLAYPOWER LT FARMING PP #2 - UAP 6/24/23-12/20/23 22407 1582 220,703.40 01/31/24 J R UNIVERSAL CONSTR PD LOCKER ROOM CONSTRUCTION PP 4 22052 1553 542,079.30 TOTAL CAPITAL IMP - FACILITIES 762,782.70
30095301 CAPITAL IMP - ROAD REHAB
01/31/24 ONYX PAVING COMPANY RES. ROADWAY REH PP 4 11/01/23-12/20/23 22212 1557 6,400.00 02/06/24 ONYX PAVING COMPANY RES. ROADWAY REH PP 5 (BALANCING 22376 1562 95,157.21 TOTAL CAPITAL IMP - ROAD REHAB 101,557.21
50000000 WF NON-DEPARTMENTAL
01/24/24 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 12/11/23 22017 2309305 102.16 01/24/24 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 11/20/2023 22018 2309306 82.84 01/24/24 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 11/01/23 22019 2309307 14.15 01/24/24 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 12/21/23 22020 2309308 25.59 TOTAL WF NON-DEPARTMENTAL 224.74
50040403 WF UTILITY BILLING
01/31/24 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES: PENS. STAMP SET, FILE 22190 1544 65.93 TOTAL WF UTILITY BILLING 65.93
50050570 WF WTR PROD. OPNS
02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. SP VALVE 22416 2309487 70.47 02/08/24 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. CL2 REPAIRS 22417 2309487 94.33 01/31/24 AMAZON SPRINKLER PIPE NIPPLE 139N-CDHP-9G1V 22077 1545 5.42 01/24/24 TESCO CONTROLS INC SCADA VPN REPAIR 21169 2309301 717.50 01/24/24 RED WING BUSINESS AD DAVID G WORK BOOTS 21166 2309285 215.00 01/24/24 LIFECOM GAS MONITOR CALIBRATION 21474 2309259 65.00 01/24/24 RED WING BUSINESS AD DAVE KELLY WORK BOOT 21476 2309285 233.81 01/24/24 SPECIAL T WATER SYST SOFT WATER SYSTEM REPAIRS 21165 2309297 290.26 01/24/24 BLUE-WHITE INDUSTRIE WIRE CONVERSION KIT 21475 2309233 760.17 01/24/24 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP C SANDALWOOD SUMP REPAIR 21477 2309261 3,329.64 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 13.46 01/24/24 AT&T MOBILITY CELLS, TABLETS, IPADS 21760 2309232 291.51

Page 39 ends

01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 13.46 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 13.46 02/07/24 SPECIAL T WATER SYST SOFT WATER SYSTEM REPAIRS 21494 2309389 1,992.50 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 59.67 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 13.46 01/31/24 AMAZON 1 IN BINDERS 22085 1546 16.43
02/08/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO WELLS -JAN (12/7/23-1/7/24) 22291 2309438 68,312.76 01/31/24 AMAZON PRINTABLE SHIPPING LABELS 1CL9-XPJX-7X6L 22164 1547 30.87 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 13.46 TOTAL WF WTR PROD. OPNS 76,552.64
50050571 WF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 55.94 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 28.12 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 28.12 01/31/24 GRAINGER, INC. SPRAY PAINT & ASPHALT LUTE 22063 2309340 821.56 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 28.12 01/31/24 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S 20'- 8" PVC PIPE 22058 2309341 304.88 01/24/24 HANSON AGGREGATES, L CMB 25 TONS 21722 2309249 450.58 02/08/24 RED WING BUSINESS AD REDWING BOOTS 22253 2309424 215.00 01/31/24 GRAINGER, INC. HIGH VISIBILITY VESTS 22062 2309340 67.12 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 28.12 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. SFTY APPRL - RAIN JACKETS 22245 2309406 392.97 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. TOOLS - SCREWDRIVER 3/8 TIP 22238 2309406 42.08 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. SFTY APPRL - RAIN PANTS 2XL 22239 2309406 53.98 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. SFTY APPRL - SAFETY VESTS 22240 2309406 67.12 02/08/24 GRAINGER, INC. SFTY APPRL - RAIN PANTS L 22243 2309406 106.41 02/08/24 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST DEC 2023 TURF REMOVAL & S2D 22345 2309457 111.00 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 28.12 02/08/24 OMEGA INDUSTRIAL SUP FOOD GRADE LUBE AND DRILL EXTRACTOR 22398 2309459 879.39 02/08/24 YO FIRE 1" COURTESY VALVES 22402 2309484 2,477.54 02/08/24 UNDERGROUND SERVICE JAN'24 DIGALERT TICKETS 22400 2309481 211.25 02/08/24 UNDERGROUND SERVICE FEB'24 DIGALERT CAL STATE FEE 22401 2309481 92.40 TOTAL WF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 6,489.82
50050572 WF WTR QUAL & TREATMENT
02/08/24 USA BLUE BOOK CHLORINE REAGANTS AND WHIPES 22301 2309446 880.26 02/08/24 SWEETNER PROD SALT FOR CHLORINE 22229 2309442 2,779.31 TOTAL WF WTR QUAL & TREATMENT 3,659.57
50050573 WF CUSTOMER SERVICE
01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 3.48 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 3.48 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 3.48 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 39.56 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 3.20 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 3.20 TOTAL WF CUSTOMER SERVICE 56.40

Page 40 ends

50050574 WF METER M & R
01/24/24 AQUA-METRIC SALES 8" OMNI METER 21723 2309230 2,780.15 01/24/24 AQUA-METRIC SALES 8" OMNI T2 REG 21724 2309230 409.45 TOTAL WF METER M & R 3,189.60
50150580 SF SEWER MAINTENANCE
01/31/24 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFF ANNUAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT 7/01/23- 22037 2309363 26,498.00 01/24/24 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFF ANNUAL PERMIT FEE FOR SWRCB WASTE 22040 2309300 20,085.00 01/24/24 OC SANITATION DISTRI OC SAN Q1 2023/2024 FOG BMP INSPECTIONS 22027 2309260 732.00 02/08/24 UTILITY CRANE & EQUI BELT AND BEARING KIT 22221 2309447 3,032.88 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-21-23) 21739 2309239 6.83 01/24/24 AT&T MOBILITY CELLS, TABLETS, IPADS 21760 2309232 80.48 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (12-28-23) 21743 2309240 49.42 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-4-24) 21737 2309238 6.40 01/24/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-11-24) 21730 2309237 6.40 01/24/24 SO CALIF EDISON CO SEWER LIFT STATION (12/13/23-1/11/24) 21721 2309294 364.27 02/08/24 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS GOLDENBELL MANHOLE COATING 22220 2309405 5,174.00 01/31/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS (1-18-24) 22166 2309322 6.40 02/08/24 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORMS 1-25-24 22228 2309399 6.40 TOTAL SF SEWER MAINTENANCE 56,048.48
50250590 SWF SOLID WASTE
02/08/24 REPUBLIC SERVICES, I JAN'24 - RUBBISH HAULING 22420 2309486 392,622.56 TOTAL SWF SOLID WASTE 392,622.56
60030301 CUSTODIAL - BLDG SAFETY
01/31/24 OC SANITATION DISTRI DECEMBER 2023 SEWER CONNECTION 21542 2309355 9,645.71 01/31/24 DEPARTMENT OF CONSER 4TH QTR 2023 SMIP FEES 21550 2309329 6,281.87 TOTAL CUSTODIAL - BLDG SAFETY 15,927.58
60070701 CUSTODIAL - ASSET SEIZ INVSTGT
02/08/24 COUNTY OF ORANGE COMPLETED ASST FORFEITURE DR#23-18815 22278 2309404 4,685.18 TOTAL CUSTODIAL - ASSET SEIZ INVSTGT 4,685.18
TOTAL $2,638,866.36

Page 41 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: February 20, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Continued -- A Public Hearing regarding the adoption of a Resolution to establish an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Feen
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On December 19, 2023, the City Council reviewed a second reading and adopted an ordinance creating, in part, an Inclusionary Housing program (IH). The ordinance was adopted as an implementation item of the Housing Element and requires that developers constructing 10 or more units to set-aside 15% of the units for lower income households.

On January 16, 2024, the City Council considered a resolution to establish an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee which would allow for developers to pay a fee instead of constructing the affordable units. The City would then be required to sequester those funds for use in developing/subsidizing future affordable housing developments.

At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council requested additional information regarding the inclusion housing in-lieu fees established by other Orange County cities and continued the item to a date certain: February 20, 2024.

DISCUSSION:

PlaceWorks, the City’s housing and General Plan consultant prepared Attachment #3, a Memorandum which compares the City of Fountian Valley’s proposed Inclusionary Housing Fee

Page 42 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting February 20, 2024

Page 2 ends

to Irvine, Santa Ana and Huntington Beach per the City Council’s request. Table 1 below from PlaceWorks’ report provides a synopsis of the per unit fee assessed by the three comparison cities.

Variations in Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fees can vary from city-to-city due to a number of factors including:
• Inclusionary Housing Ordinance: Fees are calculated based off the requirements of the inclusionary housing ordinance adopted by the local jurisdiction. No two ordinances are alike and as such, the fee calculations will vary.
• Timing: Fees studies are a point in time calculation. The timing of when the fees were established and when the fee study was conducted will determine the property values at that time.

Page 43 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting February 20, 2024

Page 3 ends

• Comparisons: In those cities that review the economics involved in recently completed affordable housing projects, the comparison projects selected will play a role in determining the fee.
• Local Conditions: Some cities limit their property valuation studies to communities within their cities. They may select a handful of representative communities within their jurisdiction and analyze the economics based on assumptions on valuations, construction costs and other factors in those neighborhoods.
• Redevelopment/Successor Agencies: Some cities’ fees were established when there were still redevelopment agencies, or in the aftermath, when cities still held land through their successor agencies. Having land available to provide for affordable housing was a major subsidy that cities could provide.
• Impacts of New RHNA: Some cities established their in-lieu fees prior to the latest RHNA cycle and recent changes in state law. With larger affordable housing targets and requirements to rezone additional land if identified affordable housing sites are developed without affordable housing, cities are now considering updating or adopting inclusionary housing ordinances and raising in-lieu fees to better ensure that affordable housing gets developed.
• Lack of State Guidance: The primary reason that in-lieu fees vary from city to city is that the State Code provides no guidance on in-lieu fees, so each city has to determine its own methodology and priorities. For example, if a city desires to minimize the impact to marketrate development, they may use a methodology that leads to a lower fee. Other cities may want to push the developer to construct on-site affordable housing, so they use a methodology that leads to a higher fee (The methodology proposed by Staff is to establish a fee that will allow the city to collaborate with affordable housing developers to construct the 15% affordable housing in the event the developer does not construct the housing onsite, without overly burdening market rate development).

FINANCIAL REVIEW:

The Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fee could potentially generate funds if future developers select to not construct some or all of their required inclusionary housing. The potential future funds would be utilized for the development of affordable housing units in the City to construct those units that would have other been constructed as part of new development over 10 units in size.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

The item was published in the Orange County Register twice, at least five days apart. Postings occurred on December 14, 2023 and January 4, 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Page 44 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting February 20, 2024

Page 4 ends

No further environmental review is necessary for the proposed ordinance pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) (Common Sense Exemption) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (State CEQA Guidelines) and the adoption of the Resolution is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the adoption of Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fees consists of the creation of a governmental funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4)); and the Resolution commits no fees to any specific project.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorneys for the City reviewed this original staff report included as Attachment #1.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

Alternative No. 2: Do not adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

Alternative No. 3: Establish the Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee at some reduced amount.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is requesting that the City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 – Adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

Prepared by: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Staff Report dated January 16, 2024, including a Resolution establishing the Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee with the attached PlaceWorks Study recommending the fee amount

2. Resolution establishing the Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee with the attached PlaceWorks Study recommending the fee amount

Page 45 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting February 20, 2024

Page 5 ends

3. PlaceWorks Memorandum dated February 14, 2024 entitled, “Comparison of Inclusionary Housing Requirements and In-Lieu Fees for Fountain Valley, Irvine, Santa Ana, and Huntington Beach

Page 46 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: January 16, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: A Public Hearing regarding the adoption of a Resolution to establish an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Ordinance further allows for developers to pay an in-lieu fee instead of constructing the required affordable units. The fee would be collected by the City and set-aside for future subsidy of affordable units. This agenda item is requesting that the Inclusionary Housing InLieu fee be set at $44,542 per market rate unit which equals the $296,950 required to subsidize an affordable unit, as calculated in the attached report.

Background:

Across California, cities are experiencing what is often referred to as a "housing crisis." The demand for housing continues to grow faster than supply, causing both homeowners and renters to be "housing cost-burdened" (i.e. spending more than 30% of their income on housing). High housing costs lead to overcrowding, economic instability, and homelessness, particularly among vulnerable groups such as seniors, lower income families, and persons with physical and mental

Page 47 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting January 16, 2024

Page 2 ends

disabilities. Approximately 63% of renters and 42% of mortgage‐holding households in Fountain Valley experience some level of overpayment. The vast majority (70%) of the City’s renter households that earn less than $50,000 spent over half of their income on rent, with roughly two‐ thirds of such households paying at least $1,500 per month in rent. A portion of ownership households no longer owe any money on their mortgage resulting in a lower rate (30%) of overpayment overall for owner‐occupied households.

Based on 2014‐2018 HUD Comprehensive Affordable Housing Strategy (CHAS) data, 78% of extremely‐low income households that are renters in Fountain Valley experience overpayment, and 83% of extremely‐low income households that are owners experience overpayment. Nearly all of very‐low income renters (93%) and 79% of low‐income households that are renters experience overpayment. For owners, 51% of very‐low income and 48% of low‐income households experience overpayment.

Under state law, the City must adopt plans, policies and programs that provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development, and demonstrate how the City’s share of regional growth will be accommodated. Through the state-mandated Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA") process, cities are allocated housing production targets, including for households with very low, low, and moderate incomes (defined by the percentage of area median income or "AMI"). The City of Fountain Valley, like all cities, must meet a significantly higher housing development target in the 6th RHNA cycle planning period from 2021 through 2029.

The table below shows the number of units by income category, and the percentage of the total, that Fountian Valley has been allocated.

Fountain Valley
6th Cycle RHNA Allocation (2021-2029)
Income Category (% of AMI) 6th Cycle Percent
Very Low (<51%)
2,093 43%
Low (51 to 80%
Moderate (81 to 120%) 834 17%
Above Moderate (>120) 1912 40%
Total RHNA 4,839 100%
To assist in meeting the housing production goals in the lower income categories, the City adopted Program 1c in the Housing Element. Program 1c states, “The City will adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance to ensure the provision of affordable housing units in all new residential developments with 10 or more units. This process will include an evaluation of ordinances adopted

Page 48 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting January 16, 2024

Page 3 ends

by jurisdictions in the greater Southern California region. The City is targeting a 15 percent inclusionary requirement.”
DISCUSSION:

The City’s recently adopted Inclusionary Housing ordinance requires developers constructing ten or more units to set aside 15% of the units for lower income households. The ordinance also allows developers to pay an in-lieu fee instead of constructing the affordable units. The City would then be required to sequester those funds for use in developing/subsidizing future affordable housing developments. The funds could be used to provide incentives or subsidies for the production of affordable housing and also support administrative functions related to affordable housing development, including the preparation of inclusionary housing plans and affordable housing agreements for eligible projects. Local affordable housing funds are often leveraged with other regional, State, and Federal funding sources by affordable housing developers to produce more units of housing with the same "local dollars" than might be achieved with an on-site only inclusionary housing policy.

The challenge is to set the fee at an amount that accurately reflects the subsidy required to construct affordable multifamily housing units. This fee must be calculated to represent the estimated gap between the cost to construct affordable housing and the likely funding from conventional financing and expected federal/state subsidies (typically 4% low income housing tax credits).

The largest construction related costs are typically land/acquisition and physical construction.

However, there are a plethora of other related costs, such as design, interest on the loans, etc.

Typical funding would include 4% Federal tax credit financing and loans from conventional banks that would be repaid through rental payments from future tenants. The subsidy is required as the rents paid by affordable tenants would be significantly less than market rate units and therefore, less conventional bank financing could be obtained.

Proposed Fee
The City’s consultant team from PlaceWorks prepared a report calculating the proposed fee (Attachment 1 Exhibit A). The methodology used was to first calculate the gap in funding between market rate and affordable units. For this, PlaceWorks analyzed six projects that were awarded federal tax credits in 2021 and 2022 from across Orange County (Irvine, Lake Forest, Orange, and Santa Ana). Based on the cost of development for those six projects, they calculated the financing gap, which is the difference between the cost of producing an affordable unit and the financing available for said unit. There are three main categories of financing. One is typical bank financing which would be in the form of a loan to be paid back from future rental payments. The second is 4% Federal Tax Credits which are derived from tax exempt bonds issued by the California Debt Limitation Allocation Committee (CDLAC). The third category is funding from various local, county, state or federal housing programs (this would include funding an in-lieu fee).

Page 49 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting January 16, 2024

Page 4 ends

The difference between the cost of producing the unit and the financing available is then the subsidy needed for the project. Per the methodology used by PlaceWorks, the financing gap is currently $296,950 per affordable unit.

As such, Staff is proposing that a developer have the option of paying the $296,950 per each affordable unit required by the City or as an alternative, pay the fee based on the number of market rate units. If the latter is selected, the fee amounts to $44,542 per unit.

The methodology for calculating the fee per market rate unit is based on dividing the total amount due by the total number of units. For example, if a developer is constructing 20 units, the City’s Inclusionary Housing ordinance would require that 3 units (20 x 15%) be affordable and the remaining 17 could be market rate units. If the developer chose to build these three affordable units, they would not be subject to the in-lieu fee. However, if the developer chose to build 20 market-rate units (no affordable units) and instead pay the in-lieu fee, the required in-lieu fee would be $890,850 ($296,950 x 3). If the $890,850 is divided by the 20 market rate units being constructed, the amount of subsidy required per market rate unit equals $44,542.

FINANCIAL REVIEW:

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

The item was published in the Orange County Register twice, at least five days apart. Postings occurred on December 14, 2023 and January 4, 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorneys for the City reviewed this staff report.

Page 50 ends

Council Action Request
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee
City Council Meeting January 16, 2024

Page 5 ends

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

Alternative No. 2: Do not adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

Alternative No. 3: Establish the Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee at some reduced amount.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is requesting that the City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 – Adopt a Resolution establishing an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee.

Prepared by: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution establishing the Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee with the attached PlaceWorks Study recommending the fee amount

Page 51 ends

1 RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN

VALLEY APPROVING A REPORT ABOUT AND ESTABLISHING THE

AMOUNT OF FEES PAYABLE IN-LIEU OF PROVIDING ONSITE

INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AS ALLOWED BY
SECTION 21.17 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM OF THE CITY'S

MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley is a California municipal corporation and general law city (”City”); and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65580(d) states that all cities have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing and to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2022, the City of Fountain Valley ("City") adopted the 2021- 2029 Housing Element of the General Plan in compliance with State law and the Housing Element was certified by the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development on October 13, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Element includes the goal of encouraging the development of affordable housing to meet the City's assigned share of the regional housing need as well as establishing an inclusionary housing program; and
WHEREAS, state law supports the City's ability to require a portion of residential development projects be made available for low to moderate income households, including under an inclusionary housing program;
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2023 the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley (“City Council”) introduced for first reading Ordinance No. 1604 that amends the Development Code and adds an inclusionary housing requirement for new Residential Development Projects in the City (Section 21.17 Inclusionary Housing Program of the City's Municipal Code) and conducted second reading and adopted the IH Ordinance on December 19, 2023 (“IH Ordinance” and “IH Program”); and
WHEREAS, in implementation of the IH Program, Section 21.17.050 of the IH Ordinance allows, as an alternative to the owner (developer) of a new Residential Development Project providing fifteen percent (15%) of the dwelling units as affordable units onsite, the option to pay fees in-lieu of constructing and covenanting onsite the mandatory number of Inclusionary Units (“IH In Lieu Fees”); and
WHEREAS, the IH Ordinance authorizes the imposition of IH In Lieu Fees on the new for-sale and rental Residential Development Projects to provide funds equal to the cost of providing affordable housing onsite and to mitigate the impact of market-rate housing developments on the need for affordable housing, where applicants are allowed to pay the IH In Lieu Fees rather than provide affordable units onsite; and

Page 52 ends

2 WHEREAS, to ensure that the IH In Lieu Fees adopted by this Resolution do not exceed the cost of providing affordable housing onsite or the actual affordable housing impacts attributable to the Residential Development Projects on which the fees are imposed, the City Council has received and considered that certain report dated October 25, 2003, prepared by Placeworks, Inc., an independent consultancy that provides a comprehensive range of planning, housing, design, and environmental services, entitled “Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation” that includes, among other information, an affordability gap analysis, which report is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A and made a part hereof (“Placeworks Report”); and
WHEREAS, the Placeworks Report demonstrates the impact of new market-rate housing on the need for affordable housing and supports the imposition of an in-lieu fee of $296,950 per affordable unit which alternatively equates to $44,542 per market rate unit in each new Residential Development Project to mitigate the impact; and WHEREAS, the Placeworks Report approved by this Resolution shows that the IH In Lieu Fees imposed by this Resolution are economically feasible and will not pose a constraint on the construction of new Residential Development Projects in the City; and WHEREAS, the IH In Lieu Fees established by this Resolution are equal to or lower than the amount needed to fully mitigate the impacts of new for sale and rental residential projects as shown therein; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019, at least 14 days prior to the public hearing at which the City Council first considered the adoption of the IH InLieu Fees, notice of the time and place of the hearing was mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased fees or service charges; and
WHEREAS, notice was published in the Orange County Register on December 14, 2023, and January 4, 2024, setting forth the time and manner of compliance with the requirements of law of providing notice of the time and place for the public hearing in the form and manner required by Government Code sections 66018, 6062(a) and 66019; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Sections 66016.5(a)(5)(B) and 66019(b), the PlaceWorks Report containing the data supporting the imposition of the IH In Lieu Fees was made available for public review and comment for 10 days prior to the public hearing at which the City Council first considered the adoption of the IH In Lieu Fees; and WHEREAS, ten (10) days advance notice of the public hearing at which the City Council first considered the adoption of the IH In Lieu Fees was given by publication in accordance with Section 6062a of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, on January 16, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing and at the conclusion, continued the item to a dater certain: February 20, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost attributable to new residential development; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt IH In-Lieu Fees for new Residential Development Projects as authorized by Ordinance No. 1604;

Page 53 ends

3 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley finds and resolves as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. The City Council further finds:

2.1 The purpose of the IH In-Lieu Fees is to provide funds to the City to cause development and construction of affordable housing and establish and implement affordable housing programs as would otherwise be provided onsite and to mitigate the burdens created by new residential development on the need for low-income housing. An applicant for a new Residential Development Project may elect to provide affordable units onsite or meet the IH Ordinance requirements through other means that include the payment of the IH In-Lieu Fees.

2.2 In compliance with the IH Ordinance, all affordable housing impacts fees collected shall be deposited in the City's Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund and shall be separately accounted for and used for purposes authorized by Section 21.17.070(g) to provide affordable housing projects and programs for income-eligible households and special needs populations in the City (including reasonable administration and compliance monitoring of the IH Program).

2.3 There is a need in the City for housing and housing programs affordable to lower income households as the term “Lower income households” is defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5.

2.4 The Placeworks Report describes cost estimates that are reasonable for constructing affordable housing, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed these costs. Based thereon, the proposed IH In-Lieu Fees are economically feasible and will not pose a constraint on housing production. (a) The City Council approves the Placeworks Report, and finds such report satisfies the following:
(i) The basis for a per unit IH In-Lieu Fees of $296,950 per affordable unit or $44,542 per market rate unit, rather than a square footage fee, is the appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a Residential Development Project; (ii) The IH In-Lieu Fees are a feasible and reasonable alternative and bear a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by a Residential Development Project; and
(iii) That the $296,950 per affordable unit or $44,542 per market rate unit (vs square footage) fee structure supports and otherwise ensures smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.

Section 3. Per the IH Ordinance, the City Council hereby adopts the IH In-Lieu Fee of $296,950 per affordable unit which can alternatively be calculated at $44,542 per market rate unit in new Residential Development Projects.

Page 54 ends

4 3.1 As an example, the IH Ordinance requires 15 percent inclusionary housing, which means that for each group of 20 new dwelling units, there would be three (3) affordable units and 17 market rate units. If the developer chooses not to build the affordable units, then all 20 units would be market rate, and the in-lieu fee across all 20 units would need to add up to the affordable housing financing gap for three affordable dwellings, of $890,849 ($296,950 per affordable unit X 3 affordable units). This works out to an in-lieu fee of $44,542 per market rate unit ($890,849 total affordable housing gap for 3 affordable units ÷ 20 market rate units).

Section 4. The adoption of the Resolution is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the adoption of IH In-Lieu Fees consists of the creation of a governmental funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4)); and the Resolution commits no fees to any specific project.

Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

Section 6. On July 1 of each calendar year, the amount of the IH In-Lieu Fees shall be increased based on the increase in the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index.

All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPIU), unless changed by resolution of the City Council. The first annual adjustment of the IH In Lieu Fees shall take place July 1, 2024.

Section 7. This Resolution shall go into full force and effect either 60 days after the adoption of this fee, or on the date that the IH Ordinance goes into effect, whichever date is later.

Section 8. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within the 90-day time period as established by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20 DAY OF February, 2024.

ATTEST:

Rick Miller, City Clerk Glenn Grandis, Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM

HARPER & BURNS LLP
_____
Attorneys for the City
City of Fountain Valley

Page 55 ends

5 EXHIBIT A: Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation from PlaceWorks dated October 25, 2023

Page 56 ends

6 ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation from PlaceWorks dated October 25, 2023

Page 57 ends

PlaceWorks | 3 MacArthur Place, Santa Ana CA 92707 | 714.966.9220 | placeworks.com

MEMORANDUM
Date: DRAFT October 25, 2023
To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director City of Fountain Valley
From: Colin Druker, Principal
Steve Gunnells, Chief Economist
Subject: Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation Summary
This memo recommends the amount for an in-lieu fee for the inclusionary housing requirement. It recommends an in-lieu fee in the amount of $44,542 per new market-rate unit or $296,950 per affordable unit required, and recommends text for a resolution to set the amount of the in-lieu fee.

Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 2

1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2

2. Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2

3. Affordable Housing Gap Calculation ......................................................................................... 3

4. Fee Calculation...................................................................................................................... 5 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 6

5. Resolution Establishing the Amount of The In-lieu Fee ............................................................... 6 Appendix ..................................................................................................................................... 7

Page 58 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 2
Analysis

1. INTRODUCTION
1A. Background
To ensure that new development in Fountain Valley generates sufficient affordable housing for the City to meet its obligations under the Regional Housing Needs Assessment and the City’s adopted General Plan Housing Element, the City is considering amending its Development Code to include an inclusionary housing requirement. The City is required to allow at least one method of compliance as an alternative to the developer providing the required number of affordable units on the same site as a new residential development project. One of the alternative methods of compliance that is being considered is the option to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing inclusionary housing units.

The purpose of this memo is to provide a methodology for calculating the in-lieu fee and to recommend the amount of the fee.

2. METHODOLOGY
2A. General Approach
The general approach is to determine the typical cost for the City to have an affordable housing unit built.

The in-lieu fee would then be set at a level that would generate sufficient revenue to have the required number of affordable units built.
2A(i) Example
Take, for example, a hypothetical residential subdivision that would have 100 lots. The inclusionary housing provisions would require that 15 of the units (15 percent of the total) be below-market-rate units (BMR) that are restricted to low-income households. The remaining 85 units would be sold at market rate (MR) prices1
.

If, instead of a mixed-income development project (i.e., 15 BMR and 85 MR units), the developer chose the alternative of paying an in-lieu fee, the proposed project would have 100 MR units, and the total amount of in-lieu fees paid should be sufficient to have 15 affordable housing units constructed elsewhere in Fountain Valley.

If that cost were $200,000 per affordable unit, then the in-lieu fee for the project should be at least $3 million (15 BMR units X $200,000 per unit = $3 million). Because the developer’s proposed project has 100 MR houses, the in-lieu fee, on a per unit basis, would be $30,000 ($3 million total ÷ 100 MR units = $30,000 per unit).
1 Under the state’s Density Bonus Law, a developer providing affordable housing units as part of a mixedincome residential development could also be eligible for a density bonus, which would permit the developer to construct additional market rate units. However, a developer choosing to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing affordable units is not eligible for a density bonus. For simplicity, the issue of density bonus units is omitted because it does not affect the in-lieu fee.

Page 59 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 3
2B. Affordable Housing Development Finance
Most affordable housing is constructed and operated by specialized affordable housing developers. They have expertise in accessing a variety of funding sources, and they have expertise in qualifying incomeeligible households. The recommended fee derived in subsequent sections is based on six Orange County affordable housing projects that the state awarded tax credits in 2021 and 2022. Details on these projects are provided in the Appendix in Tables A-1 through A-6.

There are three important types of funding for the permanent financing of affordable housing developments. First and foremost are Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC). These are tax credits that the federal government annually provides to states to distribute to affordable housing development projects. In California, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee awards tax credits on a competitive basis annually. Affordable housing developers have indicated that it is not uncommon for an application to take up to three rounds before being successful. However, they have also indicated that they are rather confident in their ability to eventually receive tax credit funding for projects. 2 As shown in Table A-4, in the
six Orange County affordable housing projects, tax credits accounted for 33 percent to 54 percent of the total permanent financing.

Affordable housing projects also rely on conventional bank financing for permanent funding, just as market rate developers do. Residents of affordable housing projects pay rent—albeit a reduced rent that is affordable. These rent payments cover the operation and maintenance expenses. The amount of rent in excess of operation and maintenance costs is used to repay the conventional bank financing.

Finally, there are all the other sources of funding. Part of the art of affordable housing development is being able to piece together a variety of other funding sources to fully fund a development. Part of the challenge is timing these other sources to coincide with the awarding of tax credit funding. 2C. Fee Basis
Affordable housing developers have indicated their confidence in obtaining tax credits and conventional bank financing. If funding from in-lieu fees can make up the difference from all the other funding sources they usually piece together, they should be able to develop affordable housing in Fountain Valley. Thus, the basis for the in-lieu fee is the gap between the development cost and the tax credit funds plus bank financing. This amount is calculated below.

3. AFFORDABLE HOUSING GAP CALCULATION
3A. Average Development Cost
Table A-5 in the Appendix provides a breakdown of the development costs for each of the six Orange County affordable housing projects, adjusted for inflation into June 2023 dollars. Generally, construction costs for affordable housing projects can be expected to be similar across Orange County jurisdictions, with the exception of the cost to acquire land. To calculate the affordable housing gap, the analysis separates 2 There are two types of LIHTC, commonly referred to as 4 percent credits and 9 percent credits. The affordable housing developers interviewed for this report say that the 9 percent credits are very challenging to get but that they are confident that they can obtain 4 percent tax credits for affordable housing projects. References to tax credits in this report refer to the 4 percent tax credits, and the permanent financing data in Table A-4 and Table A-6 are for 4 percent tax credits.

Page 60 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 4
out the land cost and substitutes a Fountain Valley-specific estimate of the cost to acquire land for affordable housing development.

Table 1, below, provides the total development cost less the land acquisition cost for the six Orange County affordable housing projects combined, the total number of affordable dwelling units across the six projects, and the resulting weighted average development cost, excluding land, per affordable residential unit. The data indicated that, on average, each unit of affordable housing costs $478,000 plus the cost to acquire land.

Table 1: Weighted Average Development Cost per Unit,
Excluding Land, in Inflation Adjusted June 2023 Dollars for Six Recent Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County;
2021 and 2022
Total Development Cost $251,475,024
Less Land Acquisition Cost $28,328,414
Development Cost, ex. Land $223,146,610
Total Number of Affordable Units 467
Average Development Cost per Unit, ex. Land $477,830
Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using cost data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee and inflation-adjustment data based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPI-U).
3B. Estimated Land Acquisition Cost
There is little vacant land in Fountain Valley and even less vacant land that is actively sold. Thus, estimating the cost to acquire land for affordable housing development is challenging. However, the analysis identified four property sales since 2018. These sites ranged from 1.96 acres (the Prada affordable housing development) to 18.64 acres (the Miller property). The data are provided in Table A-7 After adjusting for inflation, the weighted average price is $3.59 million per acre.

The six Orange County affordable housing projects provided a total of 467 affordable housing units across a total of 25.03 acres, which results in a weighted average density of 18.66 affordable housing units per acre. With an average price of $3.59 million per acre, the estimated land cost per unit is $192,343 ($3.58 million per acre ÷ 18.66 units per acre).
3C. Average Project Financing
Table A-6 in the Appendix provides a breakdown of the funding sources used for permanent financing of the six Orange County affordable housing projects, adjusted for inflation into June 2023 dollars. Table 2, below, shows the total permanent bank financing and the total federal tax credit equity as well as the weighted average per unit. The data indicate that, on average, the typical affordable housing unit is funded with $154,500 in conventional bank financing and $219,000 in federal tax credits.

Page 61 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 5
Table 2: Weighted Average Bank Financing and Federal Tax Equity per Unit in Inflation Adjusted June 2023 Dollars for Six Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County; 2021 and 2022 Total Number of Units 467
Total Permanent Bank Financing $72,140,422
Average Bank Financing per Unit $154,476
Total 4% Federal Tax Credit Equity $102,154,813
Average Tax Credit Equity per Unit $218,747
Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using funding data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee, and inflation-adjustment data based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPI-U).
3D. Affordable Housing Financing Gap
The affordable housing financing gap—which is the amount that the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee would cover—is the difference between the development cost and the two types of permanent financing that affordable housing developers can reliably access. As shown in Table 3, the analysis estimates the average affordable housing financing gap per unit in Orange County, in June 2023 dollars, at $297,000.

Table 3: Average Affordable Housing Financing Gap per Unit in Inflation Adjusted June 2023 Dollars for Recent Six
Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County; 202a and 2022 Construction Cost per Unit (ex. Land) $477,830
Land Cost per Unit $192,343
Less Bank Financing -$218,747
Less Federal 4% Tax Credit Equity -$154,476
Required Subsidy per Unit $296,950
Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using cost and funding data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee, and inflation-adjustment data based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPI-U).

4. FEE CALCULATION
The City could adopt a fee of $296,950 per affordable housing unit that is required under the inclusionary housing provisions in the Zoning Ordinance when the developer chooses to forego construction of those units. However, to facilitate an easy application of the in-lieu fee, the City may consider structuring the fee based on the number of proposed market rate units.
4A. Fee per Unit
The City is considering a development code amendment that requires 15 percent inclusionary housing.

This means that for each group of 20 new dwelling units, there would be 3 affordable units and 17 market rate units. If the developer chooses not to build the affordable units, then all 20 units would be market rate, and the in-lieu fee across all 20 units would need to add up to the affordable housing

Page 62 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 6
financing gap for three affordable dwellings, of $890,849 ($296,950 per affordable unit X 3 affordable units). This works out to an in-lieu fee of $44,542 per market rate unit ($890,849 total affordable housing gap for 3 affordable units ÷ 20 market rate units).

Recommendations

5. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE IN-LIEU FEE In conjunction with the adoption of the Development Code amendment, the City Council should adopt a resolution establishing the amount of the in-lieu fee. The resolution should state:

Pursuant to Development Code Section (insert section number authorizing an in-lieu fee), the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee is hereby established in the amount of $44,542 per new residential dwelling unit.

On July 1 of each calendar year, the amount of the in-lieu fee shall be increased based on the increase in the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index. All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPI-U), unless changed by resolution of the City Council.

Page 63 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 7
Appendix
Table A-1: Project Descriptions for Recent Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County; 2021 and 2022 Project Number CA-21-756 CA-21-757 CA-21-615 CA-21-647 CA-22-464 CA-22-553 Project Name Westview House Lynx Family
Housing
Orange
Corporate Yard Portola Senior The Meadows Seniors Apartments Cartwright Family
Apartments
Site Address 2530 & 2534
Westminster Ave
Lynx Street and
Astor Street
637 West Struck
Avenue
SE Corner Glen Ranch and
Saddleback Ranch Roads 20621 Lake Forest Drive 17861 Cartwright Road Santa Ana, CA 92706 Irvine, CA 92618 Orange CA 92867 Lake Forest CA 92679 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Irvine, CA 92614

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
# of Residential Buildings 2 8 2 1 1 1
# of Units 85 144 62 58 65 60
# of Tax Credit Units 84 142 61 57 64 59
Housing Type Non-Targeted Large Family Large Family Non-Targeted Seniors Large Family Unit Mix
1-Bedroom 23 40 17 52 15
2-Bedroom 4 64 18 40 13 17
3-Bedroom 34 40 44 1 28
4-Bedroom 24
Affordability Mix
At or below 30% AMI 63 15 9 10
At or below 40% AMI
At or below 50% AMI 93 37 10
At or below 60% AMI 21 35 18 18
At or below 70% AMI 8
At or below 80% AMI 13
Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee.

Page 64 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 8
Table A-2: Project Cost Summary for Recent Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County; 2021 and 2022 Project Number CA-21-756 CA-21-757 CA-21-615 CA-21-647 CA-22-464 CA-22-553 Project Name Westview House Lynx Family
Housing
Orange
Corporate Yard Portola Senior The Meadows Seniors Apartments Cartwright Family
Apartments
Site Address 2530 & 2534
Westminster Ave
Lynx Street and
Astor Street
637 West Struck
Avenue
SE Corner Glen Ranch and
Saddleback Ranch Roads 20621 Lake Forest Drive 17861 Cartwright Road Santa Ana, CA 92706 Irvine, CA 92618 Orange CA 92867 Lake Forest CA 92679 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Irvine, CA 92614

TOTAL PROJECT COST
Land and Acquisition 7,401,288 3,521,000 4,321,000 18,559 2,785,000 8,121,174 Construction Costs 29,107,442 42,417,022 16,645,802 10,207,108 14,855,714 18,635,921 Rehabilitation Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Construction Contingency 1,475,372 2,123,401 1,654,493 1,076,424 742,786 1,925,692 Soft Cost Contingency 100,000 198,794 300,000 307,613 300,000 390,589 Relocation 0 0 0 0 0 0
Architectural/Engineering 865,000 2,337,500 1,175,000 877,387 1,020,000 1,375,000 Const. Interest, Permanent Financing 1,705,335 2,973,000 1,649,232 1,613,489 2,005,766 3,459,980 Legal Fees 187,500 350,000 160,000 0 148,000 162,500
Reserves 1,302,160 468,422 283,800 267,747 198,600 297,200 Other Costs 2,142,944 5,062,463 2,235,179 1,399,374 2,806,900 3,243,897 Developer Fee 2,525,000 4,400,000 3,463,825 1,953,655 3,176,902 4,213,730 Total 46,812,041 63,851,602 31,888,331 21,794,074 28,039,668 41,825,683

Page 65 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 9
Table A-3: Construction Finance Summary for Recent Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County; 2021 and 2022 Project Number CA-21-756 CA-21-757 CA-21-615 CA-21-647 CA-22-464 CA-22-553 Project Name Westview House Lynx Family
Housing
Orange
Corporate Yard Portola Senior The Meadows Seniors Apartments Cartwright Family
Apartments
Site Address 2530 & 2534
Westminster Ave
Lynx Street and
Astor Street
637 West Struck
Avenue
SE Corner Glen Ranch and
Saddleback Ranch Roads 20621 Lake Forest Drive 17861 Cartwright Road Santa Ana, CA 92706 Irvine, CA 92618 Orange CA 92867 Lake Forest CA 92679 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Irvine, CA 92614

TOTAL PROJECT COST
Bank Financing 12,145,497 8,242,790 2,400,200 4,307,355 3,304,626 1,491,406 Bank Financing (Tax Exempt) 23,990,343 32,110,131 16,100,000 11,245,815 14,900,000 21,000,000 City 3,513,907 0 1,600,000 0 0 9,450,000
County Housing 1,450,349 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred Costs 2,322,638 3,677,422 3,039,768 1,062,177 3,181,742 3,786,378 State 0 0 1,250,000 0 0 1,574,810
Other 0 100 3,000,000 3,732,585 100 100
Other 0 18,253,102 762,500 953,655 2,760,000 0
Other 0 0 100 100 0 0
Tax Credit Equity 3,389,307 2,835,594 3,735,763 492,387 3,893,200 4,522,989 Total 46,812,041 65,119,139 31,888,331 21,794,074 28,039,668 41,825,683 Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee.

Page 66 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 10
Table A-4: Permanent Finance Summary for Recent Affordable Housing Projects; Orange County; 2021 and 2022 Project Number CA-21-756 CA-21-757 CA-21-615 CA-21-647 CA-22-464 CA-22-553 Project Name Westview House Lynx Family
Housing
Orange
Corporate Yard Portola Senior The Meadows Seniors Apartments Cartwright Family
Apartments
Site Address 2530 & 2534
Westminster Ave
Lynx Street and
Astor Street
637 West Struck
Avenue
SE Corner Glen Ranch and
Saddleback Ranch Roads 20621 Lake Forest Drive 17861 Cartwright Road Santa Ana, CA 92706 Irvine, CA 92618 Orange CA 92867 Lake Forest CA 92679 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Irvine, CA 92614

TOTAL PROJECT COST
Bank Financing 12,915,001 16,610,000 11,836,390 5,499,000 6,772,550 12,309,880 City 3,904,341 0 1,600,000 0 0 9,450,000
County Housing 4,258,280 0 0 0 1,192,320 0
County Other 1,450,349 0 479,520 0 0 567,000
State 7,312,537 0 1,250,000 0 0 1,574,810
State 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred Developer Fee 25,000 1,900,000 963,825 122,912 2,176,902 2,583,598 Tax Credit Equity 16,946,533 27,088,400 11,995,996 7,146,442 15,137,796 15,340,295 General Partner Equity and Contribution 0 100 100 3,732,585 100 100 Other 0 18,253,102 762,500 4,339,380 2,760,000 0
Other 0 0 3,000,000 953,755 0 0
Total 46,812,041 63,851,602 31,888,331 20,840,319 28,039,668 41,825,683 - Tax Credit Equity % of Total 36% 42% 38% 34% 54% 37%
Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee.

Page 67 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 11
Table A-5: Project Cost Summary for Recent Affordable Housing Projects, Adjusted for Inflation (June 2023 Dollars); Orange County; 2021 and 2022
Project Number CA-21-756 CA-21-757 CA-21-615 CA-21-647 CA-22-464 CA-22-553 Project Name Westview House Lynx Family
Housing
Orange
Corporate Yard Portola Senior The Meadows Seniors Apartments Cartwright Family
Apartments
Site Address 2530 & 2534
Westminster Ave
Lynx Street and
Astor Street
637 West Struck
Avenue
SE Corner Glen Ranch and
Saddleback Ranch Roads 20621 Lake Forest Drive 17861 Cartwright Road Santa Ana, CA 92706 Irvine, CA 92618 Orange CA 92867 Lake Forest CA 92679 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Irvine, CA 92614 Inflation Adjustment 1.120 1.120 1.120 1.120 1.030 1.030

TOTAL PROJECT COST
Land and Acquisition 8,288,986 3,943,303 4,839,253 20,785 2,869,247 8,366,841 Construction Costs 32,598,538 47,504,447 18,642,271 11,431,331 15,305,101 19,199,660 Rehabilitation Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Construction Contingency 1,652,326 2,378,078 1,852,930 1,205,528 765,255 1,983,944 Soft Cost Contingency 111,994 222,637 335,981 344,508 309,075 402,404 Relocation 0 0 0 0 0 0
Architectural/Engineering 968,747 2,617,856 1,315,927 982,619 1,050,855 1,416,594 Const. Interest, Permanent Financing 1,909,870 3,329,576 1,847,038 1,807,008 2,066,441 3,564,645 Legal Fees 209,988 391,978 179,190 0 152,477 167,416
Reserves 1,458,339 524,604 317,838 299,860 204,608 306,190 Other Costs 2,399,965 5,669,646 2,503,263 1,567,213 2,891,809 3,342,025 Developer Fee 2,827,844 4,927,728 3,879,270 2,187,973 3,273,004 4,341,196 Total 52,426,597 71,509,853 35,712,962 19,846,825 28,887,872 43,090,915

PER AFFORDABLE UNIT COSTS
Construction Cost per Sq. Ft. 297 314 234 230 232 240
Per Unit Cost 550,730 443,414 514,328 300,943 431,380 697,095 True Cash Per Unit Costs 550,730 406,192 450,395 300,943 397,889 655,199 Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using cost summary data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee and inflation-adjustment data based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPI-U).

Page 68 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 12
Table A-6: Permanent Finance Summary for Recent Affordable Housing Projects, Adjusted for Inflation (June 2023 Dollars); Orange County; 2021 and 2022
Project Number CA-21-756 CA-21-757 CA-21-615 CA-21-647 CA-22-464 CA-22-553 Project Name Westview House Lynx Family
Housing
Orange
Corporate Yard Portola Senior The Meadows Seniors Apartments Cartwright Family
Apartments
Site Address 2530 & 2534
Westminster Ave
Lynx Street and
Astor Street
637 West Struck
Avenue
SE Corner Glen Ranch and
Saddleback Ranch Roads 20621 Lake Forest Drive 17861 Cartwright Road Santa Ana, CA 92706 Irvine, CA 92618 Orange CA 92867 Lake Forest CA 92679 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Irvine, CA 92614 Inflation Adjustment 1.120 1.120 1.120 1.120 1.030 1.030

TOTAL PROJECT COST
Bank Financing 14,464,004 18,602,175 13,256,026 6,158,541 6,977,421 12,682,255 City 4,372,621 0 1,791,901 0 0 9,735,864
County Housing 4,769,011 0 0 0 1,228,388 0
County Other 1,624,301 0 537,033 0 0 584,152
State 8,189,590 0 1,399,923 0 0 1,622,448
State 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred Developer Fee 27,998 2,127,883 1,079,425 137,654 2,242,754 2,661,752 Tax Credit Equity 18,979,071 30,337,336 13,434,775 8,003,574 15,595,716 15,804,341 General Partner Equity and Contribution 0 112 112 4,180,265 103 103 Other 0 20,442,348 853,953 4,859,838 2,843,490 0
Other 0 0 3,359,815 1,068,147 0 0
Total 52,426,597 71,509,853 35,712,962 24,408,018 28,887,872 43,090,915 - Tax Credit Equity % of Total 36% 42% 38% 33% 54% 37%
Source: PlaceWorks 2023, using data from the CA Tax Credit Allocation Committee and inflation-adjustment data based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, All items in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, chained, not seasonally adjusted (C-CPI-U).

Page 69 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Recommendation
DRAFT October 25, 2023 • Page 13
Site Sales Price
Estimate
Inflation
Adjusted Price Area (acres) Per unit Price ($/acre)
Prado/Related 6,443,882 7,611,955 1.96 3,883,651
Slater 169-122-02 2,394,553 2,802,235 0.68 4,120,934
Slater 169-122-07 4,615,500 5,531,485 1.18 4,687,699
Slater 169-122-08 5,431,500 6,509,427 1.48 4,398,261
Miller Property 65,000,000 72,424,580 18.64 3,885,439
School Site 33,500,000 37,326,514 12.90 2,893,528
Total - 132,206,196 36.84 -
Weighted Average - - - 3,588,659

Page 70 ends

PlaceWorks | 3 MacArthur Place, Santa Ana CA 92707 | 714.966.9220 | placeworks.com

MEMORANDUM
Date: February 14, 2024
To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director City of Fountain Valley
From: Colin Druker, Principal
Steve Gunnells, Chief Economist
Subject: Comparison of Inclusionary Housing Requirements and In-Lieu Fees for Fountain Valley, Irvine, Santa Ana, and Huntington Beach
This memo provides a comparison of inclusionary housing requirements and potential in-lieu fees to support discussions about the proposed in-lieu fee being considered by the City of Fountain Valley. The analysis presents potential in-lieu fee based on two prototypical residential projects if developed in Fountain Valley, Irvine, Huntington Beach, and Santa Ana. These jurisdictions were selected due to their proximity to the Fountain Valley housing market and their administration of an inclusionary housing ordinance.

1. PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT
1A. Triplex Prototype
The triplex prototype would provide 70 single-family attached dwelling units as triplexes, with two townhouse type units and one carriage house flat over the three attached garages. The units vary in size from 1,225 to 1,758 square feet, for a total gross floor area of 140,243 square feet. The site would be

4.7 acres for a density of 14.9 units per acre. This prototype would be toward the lower end of development intensity but would be consistent with what could be built in portions of the Crossings Specific Plan. Although it is immaterial to the calculation of the fee in Fountain Valley, this prototype would most likely be built as a for-sale product.
1B. Multifamily Prototype
The multifamily prototype would provide 114 apartments. The units would range in size from 870 to 1050 square feet, for a total gross floor area of 146,660 square feet. The site would be 3.8 acres, for a gross density of 30.0 units per acre. Again, it does not matter for Fountain Valley’s proposed in-lieu fee, but this prototype would most likely be developed as a for-rent product.

Page 71 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Comparison of Inclusionary Housing Requirements and In-Lieu Fees February 14, 2024 • Page 2 of 5

2. FOUNTAIN VALLEY ANALOG
2A. In-Lieu Fee Option in Fountain Valley
Under Fountain Valley’s current requirements, new housing projects with 10 or more units are required to restrict rents or sales prices for 15 percent of the units to be affordable to lower income households. In place of developing the units onsite, the City allows an applicant to pay an in-lieu fee. Previous analysis identified a recommended in-lieu fee of $296,950 per affordable unit required. 2A(i) Triplex Prototype
If the triplex prototype were developed in Fountain Valley currently and did not include affordable housing, the developer might be eligible to pay a total in-lieu fee of $3,266,450, which is 10.5 units rounded up to 11 affordable units and multiplied by $296,950 per required affordable unit. 2A(ii) Multifamily Prototype
If the multifamily prototype were developed in Fountain Valley and did not include affordable housing, the developer might be eligible to pay a total in-lieu fee of $5,048,150, which is 17.1 units rounded down1 to 17 affordable units and multiplied by $296,950 per required affordable unit.

3. IRVINE ANALOG
3A. Current In-Lieu Fee Requirement in Irvine
Under Irvine’s current requirements2, the in-lieu fee, established in 2010, would be $16,694 per unit, based on the total number of units to be developed when the developer does not build affordable units onsite. Under the current inclusionary requirements in Irvine, the developer must demonstrate to the City that it is not financially feasible to provide affordable housing units onsite in order to use the in-lieu fee.

The in-lieu fee is currently based only on a per-unit land cost methodology (amount needed to purchase the land, but not to build the units). The current inclusionary requirement in Irvine is 15 percent: five percent low-income households, five percent very low-income households, and five percent moderate. 3A(i) Triplex Prototype
If the triplex prototype were developed in Irvine currently and did not include affordable housing, the developer might be eligible to pay a total in-lieu fee of $1,168,580 (70 units X $16,694), which is $106,235 per required affordable unit (70 units X 15% affordable unit requirement = 11 units rounded up).
3A(ii) Multifamily Prototype
If the multifamily prototype were developed in Irvine and did not include affordable housing, the developer might be eligible to pay a total in-lieu fee of $1,903,116 (114 units X $16,694), which is $105,729 per required affordable unit (114 units X 15% affordable unit requirement= 18 units rounded up). 1 The rounding down is assumed based on anticipated changes to the City’s Inclusionary Ordinance. 2 Per Chapter 2-3. Affordable Housing Implementation Procedure of the Irvine Zoning Ordinance.

Page 72 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Comparison of Inclusionary Housing Requirements and In-Lieu Fees February 14, 2024 • Page 3 of 5
3B. Recommended In-Lieu Fee in Irvine
Irvine is currently considering revisions to its inclusionary housing program3. Under the current recommendation, the inclusionary requirement would be increased to 9 percent very low-income, 6 percent low-income, and 5 percent moderate-income households.

Irvine’s study calculates an in-lieu fee for three multifamily for-rent scenarios and for three single-family attached for-sale scenarios. For each one, the study calculates a per market-rate unit fee and a per square foot fee. However, the study does not make a recommendation on whether the per unit or the per square foot fee should be used. In addition, the study provides an average fee across the three multifamily scenarios and an average fee across the three single-family attached scenarios. Again, there is a fee per market-rate unit and a fee per square foot. Irvine’s study does not make a recommendation between individual fees for each scenario versus using the average fee across each of the three scenarios.

For simplicity, this analysis uses the fee per market-rate unit averaged across the three multifamily scenarios and the fee per market-rate unit averaged across the three single-family attached scenarios.

It is important to note that the recommended in-lieu fee recognizes that the fee would likely be insufficient to fully construct the number of affordable housing units that are required, and that the City would have to leverage other funding sources to meet the affordable housing targets. However, the study recommends replacing the current land cost methodology with an affordability gap methodology that generates a higher fee that represents the difference between the cost to develop an affordable unit and the value of the unit when sold or rented to an income-qualified household.
3B(i) Triplex Prototype
The current recommendation for single-family attached for-sale housing would apply an inclusionary housing requirement only for moderate-income household because their analysis found that an inclusionary housing requirement for very low-income and low-income households for for-sale housing would not be financially feasible. The recommended requirement is that single-family attached for-sale housing provide 10 percent of the units affordable to moderate-income household. For this prototype, with 70 market-rate units, the inclusionary requirement would be 7 housing units affordable to moderateincome households.

Irvine’s study calculates an in-lieu fee of $21,178 per market rate unit for single-family attached for-sale housing. For this prototype, the total in-lieu fee would be $1,482,460 (70 units X $21,178 per unit).

This generates a fee of $211,780 per required affordable unit (70 units X 10% affordable unit requirement).
3B(ii) Multifamily Prototype
The current recommendation for inclusionary housing multifamily for-rent housing that 20 percent of the units be affordable (9% to very low-income households; 6% to low-income households; 5% to moderateincome households). For this prototype, with 114 units, the inclusionary requirement would be 22.8 affordable units.
3 City of Irvine, Affordable Housing Requirement and In-Lieu Fee Update Study, August 3, 2023.

Page 73 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Comparison of Inclusionary Housing Requirements and In-Lieu Fees February 14, 2024 • Page 4 of 5
Irvine’s study calculates an in-lieu fee of $75,213 per market rate unit ($41,029 for very low-income, $21,178 for low-income, and $13,006 for moderate-income households). For this prototype, the total inlieu fee would be $8,574,282 (114 units X $75,213 per unit). This would generate a fee of $376,065 per affordable unit (114 units X 20% affordable unit requirement).

4. SANTA ANA ANALOG
4A. Triplex Prototype
For ownership housing, the City of Santa Ana requires that five percent of the units be affordable to moderate income households. For this protype, the City would require 3.5 affordable units, which would be rounded up to a requirement for 4 affordable units.

Santa Ana’s in-lieu fee applicable to this prototype is $15 per square foot of habitable area in the market rate homes. For this prototype, the habitable area, which excludes garages, would be 105,168 square feet. The total in-lieu fee would be $1,577,520. This would generate a fee of $394,380 per affordable unit ($394,380 fee in-lieu of providing four affordable units). 4B. Multifamily Prototype
For rental projects, Santa Ana’s inclusionary requirement varies based on the income-levels at which the units will be rented. One option is for 10 percent affordable, with 5 percent low-income, 3 percent very low-income, and 2 percent extremely low-income households. With a 10 percent inclusionary requirement, this prototype would provide 11.5 affordable units, rounded up to 12 units.

The fee for this prototype would $15 per square foot of habitable space. Excluding hallways, common space, etc., this prototype has a net floor area of 109,980 square feet. Thus, the total in-lieu fee would be $1,649,700. This would generate a fee of $137,475 per affordable unit.

5. HUNTINGTON BEACH ANALOG
The Huntington Beach Affordable Housing provisions require new development to provide 10 percent of the units for inclusionary housing. For rental projects, the units must be affordable to very low-income and low-income households. With for-sale housing, the requirement is expanded to also allow moderateincome households.

Huntington Beach only allows the use of an in-lieu fee for rental residential development projects with 100 or fewer units. Although the multifamily prototype would not be eligible to use an in-lieu fee, the analysis assumes that the fee could be used in order to provide a comparison of the order of magnitude of the fee relative to the fee being considered in Fountain Valley. As of 2022, the amount of the fee varies with project size. For ownership housing in projects with 30 or more units, the fee is $27.20 per square foot of net leasable floor area and is capped at 2,000 square feet per unit. For rental projects, the fee is $38.40 per square foot of net floor area and is also capped at 2,000 square feet per unit. 5A. Triplex Prototype
This prototype, with 70 units, would be required to provide 10 percent affordable housing, or 7 units.

None of the units in this prototype exceed 2,000 square feet, so the fee would be applied to the full net

Page 74 ends

Memo To: Omar Dadabhoy, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Comparison of Inclusionary Housing Requirements and In-Lieu Fees February 14, 2024 • Page 5 of 5
floor area, 105,168 square feet. The total fee would be $2,860,570. This would generate a fee of $408,653 per affordable unit.
5B. Multifamily Prototype
With a 10 percent inclusionary requirement, this prototype would provide 11.4 affordable units, which would be rounded up to 12 units. With a net floor area of 109,980 square feet, the total fee collected would be $4,223,232. This would generate $281,549 per affordable unit.

6. COMPARISON SUMMARY
The number of affordable units and estimated in-lieu fee collected per affordable unit required information are summarized in the following table.

Table 1. Inclusionary Requirements and Estimated In-lieu Fee Comparison Summary Development Type Jurisdiction
Affordability Required Estimated
In-lieu Fee per
Mix Affordable Unit 1 Units
Triplex Prototype
70 For-sale Single-Family Attached Housing Units
Fountain Valley (Draft) 15% LWR 11 $296,950
Irvine—Current Requirement 10% LWR2, 5% M 11 $106,235
Irvine—Recommended3 10% M 7 $211,780
Santa Ana3 5% M 4 $394,380
Huntington Beach3 10% M 7 $408,653
Multifamily Prototype
114 For-rent Multifamily Apartments
Fountain Valley (Draft) 15% LWR 17 $296,950
Irvine—Current Requirement 10% LWR2, 5% M 18 $105,729
Irvine—Recommended3 9% VL, 6% L, 5% M 23 $376,065
Santa Ana3 5% L, 3% VL, 2% EL 12 $137,475
Huntington Beach3,4 10% LWR 12 $351,936

1. LWR - lower (0–80% AMI), EL - extremely low (0–30% AMI), VL - very low (30–50% AMI), L - low (50–80% AMI), M - moderate (80–120% AMI), AMI – area median income as measured on a county level.

2. Irvine currently requires 5% VL and 5% L, or 10% if combined and 60% AMI income limits.

3. Irvine and Huntington Beach currently require and/or are considering a different requirement for ownership and rental projects.

4. Huntington Beach restricts the use of in-lieu fees to for-rent projects with 100 units or fewer. The prototype is still evaluated and included in this table to illustrate the magnitude of the in-lieu fee that those jurisdictions could theoretically collect.

Note: In-lieu fee figures are estimates based on PlaceWorks’ interpretation of inclusionary housing requirements from documents and ordinances published on city websites, as viewed in February 2024.

Page 75 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: February 20, 2024
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project #24010

3. Approve a Project Budget Amendment in the amount of $100,000.

Three-Year Strategic Goals
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☒ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff recommends that the City Council accept the bids and award a construction contract to DASH Construction Company Inc. for the Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements to Slater Avenue, Project #24010 (Project) in the amount not-to-exceed $2,786,449.50. Staff also recommends that the City Council accept the proposal and authorize staff to issue a Purchase Order to Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants On-Call contract for material testing services in the amount not-to-exceed $12,075 and approve a Project Budget Amendment in the amount of $100,000.

This Project provides rehabilitation and resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street. The project also includes concrete improvements to sidewalks and curb ramps to meet ADA compliance along all pedestrian pathways in this area,

Page 76 ends

Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements to Slater Avenue, Project# 24010 February 20, 2024

Page 2 ends

reconstruction of ADA compliant driveway approaches, the restoration of circular inductive traffic loops, and concrete bus pads on Warner Avenue. In addition, the project includes curb and sidewalk replacement on Slater Avenue between San Bayes Street and Los Jardines West Street.

DISCUSSION:

Utilizing the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP), Public Works staff identified Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street as this year’s arterial street improvement project. The scope of work for the project includes the removal and reconstruction of deteriorated sections of the roadway and placement of a fiber-reinforced rubberized asphalt concrete overlay covering the entire project’s limits. The use of fiberreinforced rubberized asphalt concrete provides numerous benefits including a highly skidresistant surface that reduces noise, resists rutting, and provides increased durability and longevity.

This project also includes concrete improvements to sidewalks and curb ramps to meet ADA compliance along all pedestrian pathways in this area, reconstruction of ADA compliant driveway approaches, and the restoration of circular inductive traffic loops and concrete bus pads on Warner Avenue. In addition, the project includes curb and sidewalk replacement on Slater Avenue between San Bayes Street and Los Jardines West Street.

On December 12, 2023, the City publicly advertised Request for Bid (RFB) 23-011, Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project# 24010. On January 16, 2024, the City received seven (7) bids. The lowest responsible and responsive bidder, DASH Construction Company, Inc. submitted a bid for $2,786,449.50 in accordance with City requirements and purchasing policies.

Contractor Total Bid Amount

1. DASH Construction Company, Inc. $2,786,449.50

2. ONYX PAVING COMPANY INC. $2,896,000.00

3. Sequel Contractors, Inc. $2,998,959.05

4. Hardy & Harper, Inc. $3,015,000.00

5. R.J. Noble Company $3,253,860.75

6. All American Asphalt $3,467,703.00

7. Excel Paving Company $3,499,791.60
Engineer’s Estimate: $2,500,000
Staff estimates construction will begin in spring 2024 and conclude by summer 2024.

The lowest responsible and responsive bidder, DASH Construction Company, Inc., has successfully completed similar projects for other California municipalities including in the Cities of El Segundo, Chino, Ontario, Westlake Village, and Burbank.

Page 77 ends

Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements to Slater Avenue, Project# 24010 February 20, 2024

Page 3 ends

The Project will also require materials testing services during construction. City staff solicited proposals from the City Council-approved Materials Testing On-Call consultant list, approved on May 17, 2022, including Twining, Inc. and Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants (Ninyo & Moore). Twining submitted a proposal in the amount not-toexceed $12,679 and Ninyo & Moore submitted a proposal in the amount not-to-exceed $12,075. City staff found the Ninyo & Moore proposal to be comprehensive and a good value; therefore, City staff is recommending City Council accept Ninyo & Moore’s proposal and authorize staff to issue a Purchase Order in the amount not-to-exceed $12,075.

Ninyo & Moore is a well-known materials testing firm with a good reputation, and has provided materials testing services for various Southern California agencies, including Fountain Valley.

Ninyo & Moore has provided consulting services to Fountain Valley in the past, including providing materials testing services for projects such as the Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Heil Avenue from Euclid Street to Harbor Blvd and Ward Street from Edinger Avenue to North City Limits; Residential Roadway Rehabilitation Projects in City Quadrants D7, E1, & F1, D3, D1; Pedestrian Pathway Improvements within School Zones (GT228); and NB Newland Street at Ellis Avenue.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The adopted FY 2023/2024 budget for Project No. 24010 is not sufficient to fund this Project.

The proposed budget amendment in the amount of $100,000 will be funded by Measure M, the Water Fund, and the Sewer fund, as shown in the table below.

Project No. 24010 Budget
Funding Source Budget Proposed
Addition to
Budget
Amended Project
Budget
General Fund $631,500.00 $0 $631,500.00
RMRA (SB1) Funding $1,413,160.00 $0 $1,413,160.00
Traffic Improvement Fund $23,000.00 $0 $23,000.00
Measure M Funding $877,340.00 $14,844.00 $892,184.00
Water Fund $25,000.00 $43,500.00 $68,500.00
Sewer Fund $30,000.00 $41,656.00 $71,656.00
Total $3,000,000.00 $100,000.00 $3,100,000.00
Project No. 24010 Costs
Construction Contract (DASH Construction Company, Inc.) $2,786,449.50 10% Contingency $278,644.95
Materials Testing Services (Ninyo & Moore) $12,075
Staff Time $22,830.55
Total Project Cost $3,100,000.00
It should be noted that the City's standard Public Works contract provides the Director of Public Works authority to issue change orders of up to 10% of the original contract amount. When the Council approves the contract, it approves this authority. Ten percent, is generally considered within the normal range of changed conditions on a public works construction project and, by providing change order

Page 78 ends

Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements to Slater Avenue, Project# 24010 February 20, 2024

Page 4 ends

authority upfront, Council helps to reduce the possibility of delay damages that could be incurred when a contractor must stop work and wait for authorization to proceed.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City has reviewed and approved the DASH Construction Company, Inc. contract for construction. The Attorney for the City also reviewed the Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultant contract from the City Council-approved Materials Testing On-Call consultant list approved on May 17, 2022.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1:

3. Approve a Project Budget Amendment in the amount of $100,000.

Alternative No. 2:

1. Reject all bids and do not award a construction contract to DASH Construction Company Inc. for the Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project #24010 in the amount not-to-exceed $2,786,449.50;

2. Do not accept the proposal and do not authorize Staff to issue a Purchase Order to Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants On-Call contract for Material Testing Services not-to-exceed $12,075.

3. Do not approve a Project Budget Amendment in the amount of $100,000.

This is not the recommended action, as this will not allow the City to provide the much-needed roadway rehabilitation and resurfacing on Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and improvements on Slater Avenue.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

Page 79 ends

Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements to Slater Avenue, Project# 24010 February 20, 2024

Page 5 ends

3. Approve a Project Budget Amendment in the amount of $100,000.

Prepared by: Terri Phan, Management Aide
Recommended by: Ryan Damon, Assistant Engineer
Reviewed by: Temo Galvez, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director / City Engineer Approved by: Scott Smith, P.E., Director of Public Works Fiscal Review by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director / City Treasurer Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachment 1: DASH Construction Company Inc. Contract
Attachment 2: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants On-Call Materials Testing Contract CON 22-27
Attachment 3: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants On-Call Materials Testing Proposal

Page 80 ends

1 PWK20201211
Dear Contractor:

In entering into an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley, you must designate your form of business entity. There are three basic types of business entities. They are:

1. A Sole Proprietorship
(with or without a “dba”)

2. A Partnership

3. A Corporation
In entering into contracts with the City of Fountain Valley, please indicate the complete name of your business in one of the following acceptable formats:

1. John Smith, Sole Proprietor;
or
John Smith, Sole Proprietor,
doing business as “Acme Roofing”

2. Smith and Dokes, a California Partnership;

3. Smith Corporation, Inc.,
a California Corporation
In signing the agreement with the City of Fountain Valley, you or your agent must sign in one of the following manners so the capacity in which you or your agent is signing is clear:

1. ___________________________
John Smith, Sole Proprietor

2. Smith and Dokes
By: ______________________
John Smith, Partner

3. Smith Corporation, Inc.

By: ______________________
Vice President
Your Public Notary must indicate your capacity when acknowledging your signature.

Page 81 ends

2 PWK20201211

CONTRACT
CON-___-___
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 20th day of February, 2024, by and between the CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, hereinafter referred to as “CITY,” and DASH Construction Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “CONTRACTOR.”

WITNESSETH
That for and in consideration of the promises and agreements hereinafter made and exchanged, CITY and CONTRACTOR mutually agree as follows:

SCOPE OF THE WORK AND CONTRACT SUM

1. Scope of the Work. CONTRACTOR shall perform all the work and shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, tools, expendable equipment, utility and transportation services required to construct Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project No. 24010 (hereafter referred to as “PROJECT”).

2. Labor and Materials. All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the plans and specifications entitled Rehabilitation and Resurfacing of Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue from Brookhurst Street to Bushard Street and Improvements on Slater Avenue, Project No. 24010 and CONTRACTOR agrees to do everything required by this AGREEMENT, the plans and specifications, and the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.

All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be performed under the direction, administration, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.

3. Contract Sum. CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above agreed to be done, the sum of two million seven hundred eighty-six thousand four hundred forty-nine dollars and 50/100 ($2,786,449.50).

NOTICE TO PROCEED AND TIMING

4. Notice to Proceed. No work, services, material, or equipment shall be performed or furnished under this AGREEMENT unless and until a “Notice to Proceed” has been given to CONTRACTOR by CITY and all bonds and certificates of insurance required pursuant hereto have been furnished to and approved by CITY.

5. Time of Completion. CONTRACTOR agrees to commence the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT on the start of construction date specified in the “Notice To Proceed” and to diligently prosecute the work to completion by the completion date specified in the Notice to Proceed, which the parties agree is SIXTY (60) WORKING DAYS.

6. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this AGREEMENT.

7. Liquidated Damages/Additional Actual Damages. It is agreed by the parties hereto that in case the total work called for hereunder in all parts and requirements is not finished or completed within the number of working days as set forth herein, damage will be sustained by

Page 82 ends

3 PWK20201211
the CITY, and that it is and will be impractical and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual damage which the CITY will sustain in the event of and by reason of such delay. It is therefore agreed the CONTRACTOR will pay to the CITY the sum of SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED and 00/100 Dollars ($6,300) per calendar day for each and every day of delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of days prescribed in Section 5, and the CONTRACTOR agrees to pay said liquidated damages herein provided for and further agrees that the CITY may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the CONTRACTOR hereunder.

Liquidated damages shall be a measurement of the sum to compensate the public for inconvenience from not having the work completed on time and the cost of CITY staff to monitor the job beyond the completion date. CITY shall further be entitled to recover its additional actual damages incurred which shall be supplemental to the liquidated damages.

Provided strict compliance with Section 22 below is effected, the CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed with liquidated damages for any portion of the delay in completion of the work beyond the time named herein due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fire, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strike, and unsuitable weather, or delays of subcontractors due to such causes.

JOB PROGRESS AND COOPERATION

8. Job Progress. CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain a realistic critical path analysis throughout the project. CONTRACTOR agrees to meet with CITY’s PROJECT MANAGER or designee on a weekly or other periodic basis, or as requested by CITY to review job progress.

PROJECT MANAGER for purposes of this AGREEMENT shall be the Director of Public Works or such designee as has been given the authority for this project in a written designation.

CONTRACTOR agrees to provide CITY with critical path analysis documentation whenever job progress is impacted so that the completion date may be affected or whenever delays or other impacts may give rise to CONTRACTOR’s claim for additional days or additional damages. Delay and other claims of damages based on CONTRACTOR’s planned early completion are prohibited.

9. Cooperation. CONTRACTOR agrees to cooperate with CITY’s PROJECT MANAGER or designee and to provide submittals and participate in meetings in a good faith effort to complete the project. If disagreements arise, CONTRACTOR agrees to document the disagreement in accordance with these AGREEMENT provisions and provide CITY with early notice of the same for later resolution but shall continue to cooperate and prosecute the work to completion in a diligent manner. Nothing herein shall excuse CONTRACTOR’s strict compliance with Section 22 if additional time or money is sought.

10. CONTRACTOR’S Independent Investigation.
(a) No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist, or of conditions or difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this AGREEMENT, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this AGREEMENT out to bid, will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill in every detail all requirements of said AGREEMENT, specifications, and plans, nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time except as provided in Section 22 of this AGREEMENT.

Page 83 ends

4 PWK20201211
(b) Except as specifically provided in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, information provided for purposes of bidding do not represent “conditions indicated” as being in existence and are provided for the convenience of the parties in making their own investigation.

PREVAILING WAGES & LABOR, WAGE, AND HOURS LAWS

11. Compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act. This provision does not apply to this AGREEMENT.

12. Public Work/DIR Registration. Notice is provided pursuant to Labor Code Section 1781 that this is a “public work” as defined in Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, to which Section 1771 applies. CONTACTOR shall pay prevailing wages, unless exempt. All contractors and subcontractors working on this job shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations using online form 100.

13. Prevailing Wage Rates. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/PWD/index.htm and are on file at City Hall, which shall be made available to any interested party upon request.

CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of the determination of the director of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at each job site. Said per diem wages are deemed to include employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation and travel time, and subsistence pay, all in accordance with Section 1773.1 of the Labor Code.

14. Payroll Records. The provisions of Section 1776 of the Labor Code regarding the preparation, maintenance, and filing of payroll records are applicable to this AGREEMENT. Each contractor and subcontractor shall keep accurate payroll records, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. Electronic certified payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement or contain the same information. THE CONTRACTOR’S AND SUBCONTRACTOR’S PAYROLL RECORDS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO CITY ON A WEEKLY BASIS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTAL OF SUB-CONTRACTOR’S PAYROLL RECORDS. Additionally, CONTRACTOR or subcontractor has 10 days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of a written notice requesting the records enumerated in Section 1776 subdivision (a) of the Labor Code. In the event that CONTRACTOR or subcontractor fails to comply within the 10-day period, he or she shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit one hundred dollars ($100) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. CITY may deduct this penalty from any monies due or that may become due CONTRACTOR under this AGREEMENT.

15. Penalty. CONTRACTOR and any subcontractor under CONTRACTOR shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid (either by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor under CONTRACTOR) less than the prevailing rate set forth herein on the work provided for in this AGREEMENT. CITY may deduct the penalty from any monies due or that may become due CONTRACTOR under this AGREEMENT. The difference between the prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate shall also be paid to each worker by CONTRACTOR or subcontractor, in accordance with Section 1775 of the Labor Code of the State of California.

16. Apprentices. If applicable, the provisions of Labor Code Section 1777.5 requiring

Page 84 ends

5 PWK20201211
the use of apprentices in certain ratios to journeymen on the project are hereby imposed upon CONTRACTOR.

17. Legal Day’s Work. In the performance of this AGREEMENT, not more than eight (8) hours shall constitute a day’s work, and the CONTRACTOR shall not require more than eight (8) hours of labor in a day from any person employed by him hereunder except as provided in Labor Code Section 1815. CONTRACTOR shall conform to Article 3, Chapter 1, Part 7 (Sections 1810 et seq.) of the Labor Code of the State of California, and it is agreed that the CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY as a penalty the sum of Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of this AGREEMENT by the CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor for each calendar day during which any worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in any one (1) calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one (1) week in violation of said article. CITY may deduct this penalty from any sums owed pursuant to this AGREEMENT.

PROGRESS PAYMENTS AND RETENTION

18. Progress Payments. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7201, prior to the fifteenth (15th) day of the month next following the commencement of the work, there shall be paid to CONTRACTOR a sum equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work as determined by CITY and thereafter prior to the fifteenth (15th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments up each month to ninety-five percent (95%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work as determined by CITY, less all previous payments and authorized deductions, provided that CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last Wednesday of each preceding month. Pursuant to Public Contract Code 7107, CITY shall make the final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, within sixty (60) days after the date of completion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with all documentation required by this AGREEMENT, including the Final Closeout Agreement and Release of All Claims, as well as any other documents required by the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, such as as-builts, red-line plans, manufacturers and specific guarantees, and owner’s manuals prior to receiving final payment. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the Director of Public Works, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the AGREEMENT, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the AGREEMENT. Partial payments on the AGREEMENT price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Nothing herein shall limit CITY’s right to withhold one hundred fifty percent (150%) of disputed amounts in the event of a good faith dispute.

19. Prompt Payments. CITY agrees to promptly make progress payments on undisputed and properly submitted payment requests within thirty (30) days and to comply with the provisions of Public Contract Code Section 20104.50.

20. Retention Securities. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, CONTRACTOR will be entitled to post approved securities with the CITY or an approved financial institution in order to have the CITY release funds retained by the CITY to ensure performance of the AGREEMENT.

Page 85 ends

6 PWK20201211

21. Federal Participation. This provision does not apply to this AGREEMENT. If this project had involved federal funds, other provisions would be incorporated into this AGREEMENT.

If those provisions had applied, the Davis-Bacon Act would govern the payment of prevailing wages.

CHANGE ORDERS / EXTRA TIME / EXTRA WORK

22. Request for Extra Time or Additional Compensation. The following provisions must be strictly complied with to obtain additional time to complete the job or to obtain additional compensation:
(a) Request for Change Order – Additional Time. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly notify the CITY of any delay and shall within ten (10) days from the beginning of any such delay notify the CITY in writing of the cause of the delay, and the CITY shall extend the time for completing the work if in its judgment the cause so merits. The CITY’s determination on this matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR shall be required to submit a Request for Change Order, as set forth in this AGREEMENT, to the CITY’s PROJECT MANAGER within ten (10) days of the beginning of such delay. No adjustment shall be allowed for such delay unless there is strict compliance with this contractual provision. CONTRACTOR’s remedy shall be limited to the extra days granted and to any damages that it may be entitled to using the formula agreed to by the parties for all damages as provided in Section 22. (b) Request for Change Order – Additional Compensation Sought. (i) Should CONTRACTOR claim that the CITY is demanding extra work from it or consider any work demanded of it to be outside the requirements of this AGREEMENT or if it considers any instruction, ruling, or decision of the PROJECT MANAGER to be unfair, he shall within ten (10) days after any such demand is made, or instruction, ruling, or decision is given, file a written protest with the PROJECT MANAGER, stating clearly and in detail his objections and the reasons therefor. Except for such protests and objections as are made of record, in the manner and within the time above stated, the CONTRACTOR shall be deemed to have waived and does hereby waive all claims for extra work, damages, and extensions of time on account of demands, instructions, rulings, and decision of the PROJECT MANAGER.
(ii) Should CONTRACTOR claim that additional compensation is due it because of an unforeseen condition, CONTRACTOR shall bring that to CITY’s attention promptly and, within ten (10) days, shall submit a written request for change order to CITY. Except for such claims as are made of record, in the manner and within the time above stated, the CONTRACTOR shall be deemed to have waived and does hereby waive all claims for additional compensation on account of unforeseen conditions. (c) Request for Change Order – City Form to Be Used. CITY’s Request for Change Order form, which is attached hereto as part of this AGREEMENT, shall be the form that must be submitted in a timely fashion for a request for either additional time or additional compensation. By initialing, the CONTRACTOR specifically agrees to use said form for those purposes and understands that, if he does not submit that form in a timely manner, he waives the right to request additional time or compensation. No oral modifications or other forms of communication shall be accepted as compliance with this provision.

Contractor’s Initials ________

Page 86 ends

7 PWK20201211
(d) Change Order. Should CITY agree that a change order is warranted for either additional time or compensation, a written change order shall be executed. If CITY does not agree to the change order, and CONTRACTOR has provided timely notices and submitted its written request for change order in a timely manner, CONTRACTOR will have preserved the issue for later resolution in compliance with other procedures set forth in this AGREEMENT or as the law (including, but not limited to, Public Contract Code 9204) may otherwise require or allow. (e) Change Order Authority. The following authority is hereby given to make change orders:
(i) Change Orders for Extra Time. The City Manager, Director of Public Works, or PROJECT MANAGER shall have the authority to grant extra days without limit. (ii) Change Orders for Extra Compensation. The Director of Public Works shall have the authority to make change orders up to an aggregate amount of Ten Percent (10%) of the original contract amount.

23. Damages / Extra Work Compensation. The parties have agreed to modify the formula for damages set forth in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. The parties agree that the following damage formula shall be used to measure all of CONTRACTOR’s damages or extra work required by this job. CONTRACTOR shall be limited to the following:

Direct costs Mark-up
Labor 20%
Materials 15%
Equipment Rental 15%
Subcontracted work 10% (first $5,000)
Subcontracted work 5% (work in excess of first $5,000)
Specialty Subcontracting
(required by extra work) 5% (Provided at least three (3) competitive bids are obtained
and CONTRACTOR selected
the lowest bidder)

Excluded from recovery shall be “Eichleay damages,” home office overhead, insurance and bonding costs, lost bonding capacity, lost profits, and lost interest.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges that his recovery for damages or extra work is limited as provided in this Section.

Contractor’s Initials ________

Page 87 ends

8 PWK20201211

SUBCONTRACTING

24. Subcontracting. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that he or she is aware of the provisions of the “Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act” (Public Contract Code Sections 4100 et seq.) and agrees to comply with all applicable provisions thereof. If any part of the work to be done under this AGREEMENT is subcontracted, the subcontract shall be in writing and shall provide that all work to be performed thereunder shall be performed in accordance with this AGREEMENT. Upon request, certified copies of any or all subcontracts shall be furnished to CITY.

The subcontracting of any or all of the work to be done will in no way relieve CONTRACTOR of any part of his responsibility under the AGREEMENT. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4110, CONTRACTOR’s violation of any of the provisions of the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act violates this AGREEMENT and CITY may cancel this AGREEMENT or assess CONTRACTOR a penalty of not more than 10 percent (10%) of the subcontract involved. CITY may deduct this penalty from any monies due or that may become due to CONTRACTOR for work performed under this AGREEMENT.

All persons engaged in the work, including subcontractors, will be considered as employees of CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be held responsible for their work. CITY will deal directly with and make all payments to CONTRACTOR.

When a subcontractor fails to prosecute a portion of the work required under this AGREEMENT in a manner satisfactory to the CITY, CONTRACTOR shall remove such subcontractor immediate upon written request of the CITY, and shall request approval of a replacement subcontractor to perform the work in accordance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act at no added cost to the City.

STOP NOTICES

25. Additional Costs. Pursuant to Civil Code Section 9358, upon receipt of a stop notice, CITY shall withhold from payment to CONTRACTOR sufficient funds due or to become due to pay the claim stated in the stop notice and provide for reasonable costs of litigation. One hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the amount of the claim stated in the stop notice shall be a reasonable amount to withhold. In addition to the remedies authorized by law, CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY for administrative expenses incurred in processing Notices to Withhold, Stop Notices, or similar legal documents arising out of a failure of CONTRACTOR to pay for labor or materials. Said obligation shall be provided for in CONTRACTOR’s payment bond. CITY shall have the right to deduct any such expenses from amounts due or to become to CONTRACTOR under this AGREEMENT.

COMPLETION

26. CONTRACTOR’S Waiver. CONTRACTOR agrees to execute a Final Close Out Agreement and Release of All Claims on CITY’s form. The execution by CONTRACTOR of the Final Close Out Agreement and Release of All Claims shall constitute a waiver of all claims against CITY under or arising out of this AGREEMENT unless otherwise stated in said document.

27. Guarantees. CONTRACTOR shall and hereby does guarantee all work for a period of one (1) year after the date of acceptance of the work by the CITY and shall repair and replace any and all such work, together with any other work which may be displaced in so doing, that may prove defective in workmanship and/or materials within the one (1) year period from the date of acceptance, without expense whatsoever to the CITY, ordinary wear and tear and usual abuse or

Page 88 ends

9 PWK20201211
neglect excepted. In the event of failure to comply with the aforementioned conditions within five (5) days after being notified in writing, the CITY is hereby authorized to proceed to have the defects repaired and made good at the expense of the CONTRACTOR, who shall pay the cost and charges therefor immediately on demand. This guarantee shall be in addition to any manufacturer or specific guarantees that may be required. CONTRACTOR shall provide those manufacturer and specific guarantees before CONTRACTOR may claim entitlement to final payment.

INDEMNIFICATION

28. Indemnity. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable legal counsel fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONTRACTOR's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should conflict of interest principles preclude a single legal counsel from representing both CITY and CONTRACTOR, or should CITY otherwise find CONTRACTOR’s legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable legal counsels’ fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the result of the CONTRACTOR’s negligent, reckless or wrongful performance. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR obligations under this section apply regardless of whether or not such claim, charge, damage, demand, action, proceeding, loss, stop notice, cost, expense, judgment, civil fine or penalty, or liability was caused in part or contributed to by an Indemnitee. However, without affecting the rights of CITY under any provision of this agreement, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY for liability attributable to the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY, provided such sole or active negligence or willful misconduct is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction.

In instances where CITY is shown to have been solely or actively negligent or committed willful misconduct, and where CITY’s sole or active negligence or willful misconduct accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of CONTRACTOR will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY.

Notwithstanding any limits provided for indemnification, CONTRACTOR’s duty to defend is broader. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR agrees to provide CITY with a defense, with counsel reasonably acceptable to CITY, or pay CITY’s costs of defense, upon service of any complaint, petition, or other pleading that requires CITY to defend itself in any proceeding arising out of the work described in this AGREEMENT. Said obligation shall not extend to disputes between CONTRACTOR and CITY.

INSURANCE

29. Insurance. Without limiting CONTRACTOR’s indemnification of CITY, and prior to commencement of Work, CONTRACTOR shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this AGREEMENT, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to CITY.

Page 89 ends

10 PWK20201211
General liability insurance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability, and a $2,000,000 completed operations aggregate.

Automobile liability insurance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this AGREEMENT, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.

Umbrella or excess liability insurance. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits of not less than $4,000,000 that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including commercial general liability and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
 A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond in the event that any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectable in whole or in part for any reason;
 Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement;  Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; and  Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies.  Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.

Workers’ compensation insurance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000) for CONTRACTOR ’s employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Section 3700 of the Labor Code In addition, CONTRACTOR shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Section 3700 for all of the subcontractor’s employees.

CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

Pollution liability insurance. Environmental Impairment Liability Insurance shall be written on a Contractor’s Pollution Liability form or other form acceptable to CITY providing coverage for liability arising out of sudden, accidental and gradual pollution and remediation. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 dollars per claim and in the aggregate. All activities contemplated in this AGREEMENT shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.” The policy shall provide coverage for the hauling of waste from the PROJECT site to the final disposal location, including non-owned disposal sites.

Products/completed operations coverage shall extend a minimum of three years after PROJECT completion. Coverage shall be included on behalf of the insured for covered claims arising out of the actions of independent contractors. If the insured is using subcontractors, the Policy must include work performed “by or on behalf” of the insured. Policy shall contain no language that would invalidate or remove the insurer’s duty to defend or indemnify for claims or

Page 90 ends

Fountain Valley City CouncilFebruary 20, 2024

Fountain Valley City Council
February 20, 2024