Agenda packet — Fowler City Council, April 21, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

APPENDIX C - IPAC SPECIES LIST
254
Section , Item B
02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
Phone: (916) 414-6600 Fax: (916) 414-6713
In Reply Refer To:

Project Code: 2025-0057192
Project Name: Clayton Avenue Industrial Subdivision
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 255
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
2 of 8
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultationhandbook.pdf Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/whatwe-do.

The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.

In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservationmigratory-birds.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.
256
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
3 of 8
▪
Attachment(s):

Official Species List

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
(916) 414-6600
257
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
4 of 8

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2025-0057192
Project Name: Clayton Avenue Industrial Subdivision
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Annexation and re-zoning for residential and industrial purposes.

Project Location:

The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@36.6400021,-119.68718307859262,14z Counties: Fresno County, California
258
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
5 of 8

1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
1 259
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
6 of 8

MAMMALS

NAME STATUS
Fresno Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5150
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered
BIRDS

NAME STATUS
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus
Population: Western U.S. DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3911
Threatened

REPTILES

NAME STATUS
Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Gambelia silus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/625
Endangered
Northwestern Pond Turtle Actinemys marmorata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1111
Proposed
Threatened

AMPHIBIANS

NAME STATUS
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
Population: U.S.A. (Central CA DPS)
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened
Western Spadefoot Spea hammondii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5425
Proposed
Threatened

INSECTS

NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Proposed
Threatened
260
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
7 of 8

CRUSTACEANS

NAME STATUS
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened

CRITICAL HABITATS

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.

YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
261
Section , Item B
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
8 of 8

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Private Entity
Name: Kira McCall
Address: 1518 Mill Rock Way
Address Line 2: Ste 100
City: Bakersfield
State: CA
Zip: 93311
Email [email protected]
Phone: 6616165900
262
Section , Item B

APPENDIX D - NRCS SOILS REPORT
263
Section , Item B
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Eastern Fresno
Area, California Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
February 14, 2025264
Section , Item B
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.

They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.

Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.

The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 265
Section , Item B
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 266
Section , Item B
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Eastern Fresno Area, California......................................................................13 DhA—Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, MLRA 17..........................13 Hc—Hanford sandy loam............................................................................14 Hsd—Hesperia sandy loam, very deep.......................................................15 Hsr—Hesperia fine sandy loam, very deep.................................................16 References............................................................................................................19 4 267
Section , Item B
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).

Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 268
Section , Item B
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.

The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.

These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.

Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report
6 269
Section , Item B
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Custom Soil Resource Report
7 270
Section , Item B
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 271
Section , Item B
9 Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4058080 4058160 4058240 4058320 4058400 4058480 4058560 4058080 4058160 4058240 4058320 4058400 4058480
259120 259200 259280 259360 259440 259520 259600 259680 259760 259840 259120 259200 259280 259360 259440 259520 259600 259680 259760 259840 36° 38' 31'' N
119° 41' 40'' W
36° 38' 31'' N
119° 41' 9'' W
36° 38' 15'' N
119° 41' 40'' W
36° 38' 15'' N N 119° 41' 9'' W
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Meters
Map Scale: 1:3,560 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
272
Section , Item B

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:

Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Eastern Fresno Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Aug 30, 2024
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2022—May 30, 2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
10 273
Section , Item B
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI DhA Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes, MLRA 17

0.0 0.1%
Hc Hanford sandy loam 3.2 6.8%
Hsd Hesperia sandy loam, very
deep

27.7 59.7%
Hsr Hesperia fine sandy loam, very
deep

15.5 33.4%
Totals for Area of Interest 46.4 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.

Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate Custom Soil Resource Report
11 274
Section , Item B
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.

Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.

These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.

The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.

Custom Soil Resource Report
12 275
Section , Item B
Eastern Fresno Area, California
DhA—Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, MLRA 17
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2ss8r
Elevation: 30 to 430 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 310 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Delhi and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Delhi
Setting
Landform: Dunes on fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Eolian deposits derived from sandy alluvium derived from granite Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
C1 - 7 to 25 inches: loamy sand
C2 - 25 to 60 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY906CA - Non-Alkali San Joaquin Valley Desert Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
13 276
Section , Item B
Landform: Depressions on fan remnants
Hydric soil rating: No
Dello
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Depressions on fan remnants
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Hilmar
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Hc—Hanford sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl5f
Elevation: 200 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, rise Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 16 inches: sandy loam
C - 16 to 72 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
14 277
Section , Item B
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, channeled
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Channels on alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Hsd—Hesperia sandy loam, very deep
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2yc9k
Elevation: 210 to 310 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 310 to 326 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hesperia and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hesperia
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Custom Soil Resource Report
15 278
Section , Item B
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Ap2 - 5 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 32 inches: sandy loam
Btk - 32 to 60 inches: sandy loam
2Bdk - 60 to 67 inches: stratified silt loam
2Cd - 67 to 79 inches: stratified silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 60 inches to densic material Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low (0.01 to

0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 2.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 6.0 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R017XY906CA - Non-Alkali San Joaquin Valley Desert Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Hsr—Hesperia fine sandy loam, very deep
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2yc9f
Elevation: 240 to 320 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 316 to 327 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Custom Soil Resource Report
16 279
Section , Item B
Map Unit Composition
Hesperia and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hesperia
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 5 inches: fine sandy loam
Ap2 - 5 to 11 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 32 inches: fine sandy loam
Btk - 32 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam
2Bdk - 60 to 67 inches: stratified silt loam
2Cd - 67 to 79 inches: stratified silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 60 inches to densic material Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low (0.01 to

0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 2.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R017XY905CA - Dry Alluvial Fans and Terraces Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed, loam surface
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
17 280
Section , Item B
Custom Soil Resource Report
18 281
Section , Item B
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 19 282
Section , Item B
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report
20 283
Section , Item B
Appendices
Tentative Map No. 6471
February 2025 C-1
Appendix C: Cultural Resources Information
284
Section , Item B
To: Jackie Lancaster Record Search 24-414
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
400 E. Main Street, Suite 300
Visalia, CA 93291
Date: September 24, 2024
Re: City of Fowler Clayton Industrial Tentative Map Project. Project No. 2619-22-023 Phase TTM County: Fresno
Map(s): Malaga 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies completed within the project area. There have been four cultural resource studies conducted within the onehalf mile radius: FR-00135, 02287, 02452, 02642. 285
Section , Item B
Record Search 24-414

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS According to the information in our files, there are no recorded cultural resources within the project area. There are three recorded cultural resource within the one-half mile radius: P-10-002962, 003930, 004423.

These resources consist of historic era refuse scatter, a railroad, & park.

There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, for the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project intends to annex approximately 83.04 acres of farmland into the City of Fowler. Additionally, we understand this project would prezone approx. 30.65 acres to light industrial zone district and the remaining to future residential development, with future improvements to intersections when warranted. Further, we understand the existing project area is agricultural land. Please note that agriculture does not constitute previous development, as it does not destroy cultural resources, but merely moves them around within the plow zone. As such, there are no further cultural resource investigations needed to annex and prezone properties. However, prior to any future stages of this project that require ground disturbance, we recommend a qualified, professional consultant conduct a field survey to determine if cultural resources are present. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Jeremy E David, Assistant Coordinator Date: September 24, 2024 Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.
286
Section , Item B
Appendices
Tentative Map No. 6471
February 2025 D-1
Appendix D: Traffic Impact Study
287
Section , Item B
Clayton and Golden State Blvd. Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study
September 2024
Prepared for:

City of Fowler
Prepared by:

VRPA Technologies, Inc.
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105
Fresno, CA 93722
In Association With:

Precision Engineering
Vrpa TECHNOIOGIES. INC.
288
Section , Item B
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study
Study Team
 Georgiena Vivian, President, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], (559) 259-9257
 Erik Ruehr, Dir. of Traffic Engineering, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], (858) 566-1766
 Jeff Stine, Senior Transportation Planner, VRPA Technologies, Inc. [email protected], (858) 566-1766
 Nisha Pathak, Transportation Engineer, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], (559) 271-1200
289
Section , Item B
Table of Contents
Section Description Page

1.0 Introduction 1-1

1.1 Description of the Region/Project 1-1

1.1.1 Project Access 1-1

1.1.2 Study Area 1-1

1.1.3 Study Scenarios 1-2

1.2 Methodology 1-2

1.2.1 Intersection Analysis 1-2

1.2.2 Roadway Segment Analysis 1-3

1.2.3 Queuing Analysis 1-3

1.3 Policies to Maintain Level of Service 1-4

2.0 Existing Conditions 2-1

2.1 Existing Traffic Counts and Roadway Geometrics 2-1

2.2 Existing Functional Roadway Classification System 2-1

2.3 Affected Streets and Highways 2-2

2.4 Level of Service 2-6

2.4.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis 2-6

2.4.2 Queuing Analysis 2-6

2.4.3 Roadway Segment Analysis 2-7

2.5 Study Area Collision Analysis 2-7

3.0 Traffic Impacts 3-1

3.1 Trip Generation 3-1

3.2 Trip Distribution 3-1

3.3 Project Traffic 3-3

3.4 Existing Plus Project Conditions 3-3

3.5 Horizon Year Without Project Conditions 3-3

3.6 Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions 3-3

3.7 Impacts 3-3

3.7.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis 3-3

3.7.2 Queuing Analysis 3-4

3.7.3 Roadway Segment Analysis 3-4
290
Section , Item B

4.0 Roadway Improvements 4-1

4.1 Roadway Improvements 4-1

4.2 Equitable Share Responsibility 4-3

Appendices
Appendix A – Roadway Functional Class and Peak Hour
Level-of-Service Thresholds
Appendix B – Traffic Counts
Appendix C – Synchro Worksheets
Appendix D – Detailed Collision Data
Appendix E – Signal Warrant Worksheets

List of Tables
1-1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions 1-8 1-2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions 1-9 1-3 Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions 1-10
1-4 Peak Hour Two-Way Segment Volume Thresholds 1-11
2-1 Existing Intersection Operations 2-8
2-2 Existing Queuing Operations 2-9
2-3 Existing Roadway Segment Operations 2-10
3-1 Project Trip Generation 3-1
3-3 Intersection Operations 3-13
3-3 Queuing Operations 3-14
3-4 Roadway Segment Operations 3-15
4-1 Intersection Operations with Roadway Improvements 4-5 4-2 Left Turn and Right Turn Storage Requirements 4-6
4-3 Horizon Year Equitable Share Responsibility 4-7
List of Figures
1-1 Regional Location 1-5
1-2 Project Location 1-6
1-3 Project Site Plan 1-7
2-1 Existing Lane Geometry 2-3
2-2 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic 2-4
2-3 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic 2-5
2-4 Study Area Collision Map 2-11
3-1 Trip Distribution 3-2
3-2 Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-5
291
Section , Item B
3-3 Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-6
3-4 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-7
3-5 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-8
3-6 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-9 3-7 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-10 3-8 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-11 3-9 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-12 4-1 Proposed Lane Geometry 4-4

292
Section , Item B
1-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Description of the Region/Project
This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) has been prepared for the purpose of analyzing traffic conditions related to the proposed Clayton and Golden State Boulevard Property Prezone (Project) in the County of Fresno. The Project site, currently outside of the City of Fowler limits but within the City of Fowler’s sphere of influence, proposes land uses of Light Industrial and Medium Low Residential. The Annexation/Prezone proposes a prezone to M-1 and R-1-7. The Project also proposes a 44-lot industrial subdivision on the area with a land use designation of Light Industrial, which is consistent with the General Plan. The Annexation/Prezone of the subject property would affect traffic operations that may trigger the need for improvements and/or other measures within the study area to address traffic operations. The Project will be located on approximately 45.04 acres of land, south of Clayton Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and North Fowler Avenue at 5469 East Clayton Avenue, Fowler, CA (APNs 340-120-05-28, and 340-120-05-29).

Figures 1-1 and 1-2 show the location of the Project along with major roadways in the Project area. The Project site plan is provided in Figure 1-3.

1.1.1 Project Access
Site access will be provided at two Project Driveways along Clayton Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue. At the south end of the Project, Lynn Avenue dead ends at the south property line.

1.1.2 Study Area
The following intersections and roadway segments included in this TIS were determined in consultation with County of Fresno and Caltrans staff that include:

Intersections

1. American Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

2. American Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

3. Jefferson Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

4. Clovis Avenue and Jefferson Avenue

5. Clovis Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

6. Fowler Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

7. Clayton Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

8. Clayton Avenue and Fowler Avenue

9. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 NB Ramps

10. Clayton Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

11. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 SB Ramps

12. Adams Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

13. Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

14. Merced Street and Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp
mwm.
293
Section , Item B
1-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction

1.1.3 Study Scenarios
This TIS includes level of service (LOS) analysis for the following traffic scenarios (Study Scenarios):
 Existing Conditions
 Existing Plus Project Conditions
 Horizon Year 2044 Without Project Conditions
 Horizon Year 2044 Plus Project Conditions

1.2 Methodology
When preparing this TIS, guidelines set by the City of Fowler were followed. In analyzing street and intersection capacities, LOS methodologies from the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) were applied. The City of Fowler LOS standards were applied to quantitatively assess the performance of study area intersections and roadway segments. In addition, safety concerns were considered when determining the need for appropriate mitigation resulting from increased traffic near sensitive uses.

1.2.1 Intersection Analysis
Intersection LOS analysis was conducted using the Synchro 12 software program. Synchro 12 supports HCM 6th Edition methodologies and is an acceptable program by City of Fowler staff for assessment of traffic impacts. Levels of Service can be determined for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. All the study intersections are currently unsignalized except for two intersections (American Avenue at SR 99 NB On Ramp and Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp) mwm.
294
Section , Item B
1-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
which do not have any intersection controls.

Tables 1-1 and 1-2 indicate the ranges in the amounts of average delay for a vehicle at signalized and unsignalized intersections for the various levels of service ranging from LOS “A” to “F”.

When an unsignalized intersection does not meet acceptable LOS standards, the investigation of the need for a traffic signal shall be evaluated. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (California MUTCD) introduces standards for determining the need for traffic signals. The California MUTCD indicates that the satisfaction of one or more traffic signal warrants does not in itself require the installation of a traffic signal. In addition to the warrant analysis, an engineering study of the current or expected traffic conditions should be conducted to determine whether the installation of a traffic signal is justified. The California MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3) was used to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at unsignalized intersections that fall below current LOS standards.

1.2.2 Roadway Segment Analysis
According to the HCM, LOS is categorized by two parameters of traffic: uninterrupted and interrupted flow. Uninterrupted flow facilities do not have fixed elements such as traffic signals that cause interruptions in traffic flow. Interrupted flow facilities do have fixed elements that cause an interruption in the flow of traffic, such as stop signs and signalized intersections along arterial roads. A roadway segment is defined as a stretch of roadway generally located between signalized or controlled intersections.

Segment LOS is important in order to understand whether the capacity of a roadway can accommodate future traffic volumes. Table 1-3 provides a definition of segment LOS. The performance criteria used for evaluating volumes and capacities on the road and highway system for this study were estimated using Table 5.14-2 (Roadway Functional Class and Peak Hour Levelof-Service Thresholds) from the City of Fresno General Plan and Development Code Update Master Environmental Impact Report. The tables consider the capacity of individual road and highway segments. Street segment capacity was determined using information shown in Table 1-4 based on the Level of Service Tables included in Appendix A.

1.2.3 Queuing Analysis
Queuing analysis was performed at study intersections utilizing the Synchro 12 software program. This software aligns with the methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition. Synchro provides queuing results in feet for signalized intersections while the 95th percentile queue for unsignalized intersections are expressed in number of vehicles. A vehicle length of 25 feet was applied to estimate the queue length, in feet, for unsignalized intersections.
mwm.
295
Section , Item B
1-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction

1.3 Policies to Maintain Level of Service
An important goal is to maintain an acceptable level of service along the highway, street, and road network. To accomplish this, the City of Fowler adopted minimum levels of service to control congestion that may result as new development occurs.

The City of Fowler’s General Plan, adopted April 18, 2023, encourages a LOS ‘C’ throughout the local circulation network according to Policy MOB-5. In addition, Policy MOB-5 indicates that LOS ‘D’ may be allowed during peak hours at intersections of major streets, at SR 99 interchanges, and along street segments where additional improvements are not feasible. LOS ‘D’ may also be allowed along streets with the potential for a high level of pedestrian and bicyclist activity. LOS ‘E’ may be permitted during peak hour use of certain road intersections and segments where pedestrian and bicycle activity is prioritized. For purposes of this analysis, LOS ‘D’ was applied to intersections of major streets (American Avenue, Golden State Boulevard, Clovis Avenue, SR 99 Ramps) in the study area while LOS ‘C’ was applied to all other intersecting streets/roadways.

Fresno County’s 2000 General Plan, policy number TR-A.2, identifies a minimum LOS standard of ‘D’ on urban roadways within the spheres of influence of the cities of Fresno and Clovis and identifies a minimum LOS standard of ‘C’ on all other roadways in the county.

Based on guidance from Caltrans, the LOS for operating State highway facilities is based on Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) identified in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS “C” and LOS “D” on State highway facilities; however, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS.

If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than this target LOS, the existing MOE should be maintained. In general, the region-wide goal for an acceptable LOS on all freeways, roadways segments, and intersections is “D”. For undeveloped or not densely developed locations, the goal may be to achieve LOS “C”.
mwm.
296
Section , Item B
1-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Regional Location
Figure
1-1
Manteca Yosemite National Park
Modesto 1
Turlock
395
■ •• ®
SierraNational Forest
'395
Dinuba Inyo National Forest
Hanford Visalia '395 Tulare
•101 Porterville
Coalinga
Sequoia National Forest 101
395* Delano
SL Ridgecrest o .

Obispo
A “
National Monument Santa Mana •395]
, I Lancaster
y Palmdale V
Lompoc
LEGEND
Project Location
i/rpa TECHNOIOGIES INC.
ircmwewn i*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Regional Location
Figure
1-1
Manteca Yosemite National Park
Modesto 1
Turlock
395
■ •• ®
SierraNational Forest
'395
Dinuba Inyo National Forest
Hanford Visalia '395 Tulare
•101 Porterville
Coalinga
Sequoia National Forest 101
395* Delano
SL Ridgecrest o .

Obispo
A “
National Monument Santa Mana •395]
, I Lancaster
y Palmdale V
Lompoc
LEGEND
Project Location
i/rpa TECHNOIOGIES INC.
ircmwewn i*c
297
Section , Item B
1-6 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project Location
Figure
1-2
American Ave
Sunnyside Ave
Fowler Ave
North
Jefferson Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Aye
Minnewawa Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
------- Study Roadway Segment
Adams Ave
Sumner Ave
VrPA TECHNOLOGIES,INC
Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project Location
Figure
1-2
American Ave
Sunnyside Ave
Fowler Ave
North
Jefferson Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Aye
Minnewawa Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
------- Study Roadway Segment
Adams Ave
Sumner Ave
VrPA TECHNOLOGIES,INC
Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
298
Section , Item B
1-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project Site Plan
Figure
1-3
j4O-T00-*W

SAHA FARMWLLC
EXISDNG 60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF HAY AVENUE
0OGHOSANPHILIPTW E EXCEPTION #12 - 20' IRRIGADON RIGHT OF IMr-i EXCEPTION #8 - 20' PUBUC RIGHT OF HW-1 PROPOSED 20' RIGHT OF IVAV DEDICATION-] North EXISTING COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY- -EXISTING 40' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY CTR 1/4 COR. SEC 9 15/21-, EAST EXISTING STAND PIPE- CLAYTON — ;if ", 657.51' 20.00' ............... 1305.03H- 99.00" ] cP. | 207.48’ 85.00'
'3>. 105.00' 105.00’ 100.10’ 119.00’ 119.00' 101.78' 2 §

0.46 2 ACRES
3 o

0.48 § ACRES 5
■ > 38 -o § 0.41 §
2 ACRES 2 4 §

0.48 S
ACRES "
10 g

0.49 o ACRES ~
6 8

0.49 g
ACRES
7 8

0.49 8
ACRES "
8 8

0.49 g
ACRES ~
9 0.49 ACRES
5 8 s

0.47 $ ACRES

85.00/b
LROAD
LIGHT, POLE 1.07 ACRES
L=53.62
L=57.96
-L=29.74

26.69'
I | 105.00' 105.00' 1 19.00' 119,00' | 119.00' 121.78' 12 CULVERT AND WALL ABANDONED 'WaILRWLll- EASL. 8 37 8 8 0.42 8
~ ACRES "
140.09' U 100.10 99.00’ IW

85.00'
'EP
119.00’ 119.00’ 119.00' 44

0.86 ACRES
121.78’ 14 8

0.55 g
ACRES
15 0.55 130.55 ACRES
12 0.55 ACRES
11 0.54 ACRES g
8 8 36 8
8 0-42 g
ACRES
ACRES S 8

73.63' 105.00' 119.00’ 1 19.00' 119.00’ 119.00' 388.63’ 60'
121.78' 40
35 g
8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 16 8

0.55 8
ACRES
18 8

0.55 g
ACRES
17 8

0.55 ACRES
20 0.54 ACRES
19 0.55 ACRES
ACRES g
257.24' 21.69’ --------- L=29.74 99.00' 121.78’ 119.00' 119.00' 119.00’ 8 34 g 8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 39

0.87 ACRES

51.79‘\ L=29.74
138.00' 138.00' 120.00' 100.00’ 22

0.44 ACRES
21 0.44 ACRES
EXCEPTION L=64.88 #5 & #7 - 100' RIGHT OF WAY FOR- RAILROAD PURPOSES 121.78' 25 8

0.58 ACRES
24 0.58 ACRES
23 0.58 ACRES s g
£ 8 33 8
8 0.42 g
ACRES "
SECDON LINE — k

PARCEL LINE
120.00' 120.00' 139.83' 138.00' 138.00' 229.83' 186.00' 27

0.43 g
ACRES g
L=33.04- L=29.74

61.69' |
28 0.44 ACRES
121.78' EXCEPTION f9 - 15' DITCH EASEMENT 26 $

0.67 ACRES
L=78.54
136.00'
■d b 32
§ n 8
0-56 § ACRES g
100.00'
L=71.34 OUTLOT A

1.44 ACRES

64.52' | L=29.74 121.78' L= 40.24 29 s

0.60 § ACRES
30 ■o 31

0.56 ACRES
I K

0.52 S
ACRES 2

54.45' 130.00' 116.52'
InnageSource: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. \/rpa TCCHHOUmiEt INC WEST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 10 15/21- FOUND 1" IRON PIPE, L.S. 2484, DOWN 0.8’ PER RECORD OF SURVEY BK. 43, PG. 78 EXISTING MAILBOXES (3h &
-EXISTING STAND PIPE PROPANE TANKi. 65.4’ r&
-EXISTING HOUSE
APPROX. LOCATION OF SANITARY SEWER SEPTIC TANK'' 18.82' —EXISTING BARN

18.15' I 105.00’ 105.00' 1 H-26.69’ 1 =29.74 EXISTING STAND 43 8 42 8

0.48 g 0.48 g

M ACRES ACRES
105.00’ 105.00'
--EXISTING WATER TANK

GAS TANK- POWER POLE W/ELECTRICAL METER
ELECTRIC PANEL8' DIRT ROAD

EXISTING WATER FILTER- & WATER LINE

REMAINDER

0.46 2 ACRES
3 o

0.48 § ACRES 5
■ > 38 -o § 0.41 §
2 ACRES 2 4 §

0.48 S
ACRES "
10 g

0.49 o ACRES ~
6 8

0.49 g
ACRES
7 8

0.49 8
ACRES "
8 8

0.49 g
ACRES ~
9 0.49 ACRES
5 8 s

0.47 $ ACRES

85.00/b
LROAD
LIGHT, POLE 1.07 ACRES
L=53.62
L=57.96
-L=29.74

26.69'
I | 105.00' 105.00' 1 19.00' 119,00' | 119.00' 121.78' 12 CULVERT AND WALL ABANDONED 'WaILRWLll- EASL. 8 37 8 8 0.42 8
~ ACRES "
140.09' U 100.10 99.00’ IW

85.00'
'EP
119.00’ 119.00’ 119.00' 44

0.86 ACRES
121.78’ 14 8

0.55 g
ACRES
15 0.55 130.55 ACRES
12 0.55 ACRES
11 0.54 ACRES g
8 8 36 8
8 0-42 g
ACRES
ACRES S 8

73.63' 105.00' 119.00’ 1 19.00' 119.00’ 119.00' 388.63’ 60'
121.78' 40
35 g
8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 16 8

0.55 8
ACRES
18 8

0.55 g
ACRES
17 8

0.55 ACRES
20 0.54 ACRES
19 0.55 ACRES
ACRES g
257.24' 21.69’ --------- L=29.74 99.00' 121.78’ 119.00' 119.00' 119.00’ 8 34 g 8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 39

0.87 ACRES

51.79‘\ L=29.74
138.00' 138.00' 120.00' 100.00’ 22

0.44 ACRES
21 0.44 ACRES
EXCEPTION L=64.88 #5 & #7 - 100' RIGHT OF WAY FOR- RAILROAD PURPOSES 121.78' 25 8

0.58 ACRES
24 0.58 ACRES
23 0.58 ACRES s g
£ 8 33 8
8 0.42 g
ACRES "
SECDON LINE — k

PARCEL LINE
120.00' 120.00' 139.83' 138.00' 138.00' 229.83' 186.00' 27

0.43 g
ACRES g
L=33.04- L=29.74

61.69' |
28 0.44 ACRES
121.78' EXCEPTION f9 - 15' DITCH EASEMENT 26 $

0.67 ACRES
L=78.54
136.00'
■d b 32
§ n 8
0-56 § ACRES g
100.00'
L=71.34 OUTLOT A

1.44 ACRES

64.52' | L=29.74 121.78' L= 40.24 29 s

0.60 § ACRES
30 ■o 31

0.56 ACRES
I K

0.52 S
ACRES 2

18.15' I 105.00’ 105.00' 1 H-26.69’ 1 =29.74 EXISTING STAND 43 8 42 8

0.48 g 0.48 g

M ACRES ACRES
105.00’ 105.00'
--EXISTING WATER TANK

GAS TANK- POWER POLE W/ELECTRICAL METER
ELECTRIC PANEL8' DIRT ROAD

EXISTING WATER FILTER- & WATER LINE

REMAINDER

14.39 ACRES
PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL
1287.51'
5 i
34O- T20-0&
ftAZWWIPAULETTE
fowleravenue
10‘ DIRT ROAD
WATER CONNECTION- 150.00' 477,08'
-01 960.48'
EXISTING 6' BLOCK WALL'
\RPA
299
Section , Item B
1-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-1
Signalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions
(Highway Capacity Manual)
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (sec/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION Describes operations with very low delay. This level of service occurs whentherels no conflict!ng trafficfora minorstreet. A <10,0 Describes operations with moderately low delay. This level generally occurs with a small amount of conflicting traffic causing higher levels of averagedelay.
>10.0-20.0
Describes operations with average delays. Thesehigher delays may result from a moderate amount of minor street traffic. Queues begin to get longer.
>20.0-35.0
Describes a crowded operation, with below average delays. Atlevel D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from shorter gaps on the mainline and an increase of minor street D >35.0-55.0 Describes operations at or near capacity, This level is considered by many E agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values >55.0-80.0 Describes operations that are at the failure point. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over- saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceedthe capacity of the intersection. Insufficient gaps of suitable size exist to allow minor traffic to cross the intersection safely.

F >80.0
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (sec/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION Describes operations with very low delay. This level of service occurs whentherels no conflict!ng trafficfora minorstreet. A <10,0 Describes operations with moderately low delay. This level generally occurs with a small amount of conflicting traffic causing higher levels of averagedelay.
>10.0-20.0
Describes operations with average delays. Thesehigher delays may result from a moderate amount of minor street traffic. Queues begin to get longer.
>20.0-35.0
Describes a crowded operation, with below average delays. Atlevel D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from shorter gaps on the mainline and an increase of minor street D >35.0-55.0 Describes operations at or near capacity, This level is considered by many E agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values >55.0-80.0 Describes operations that are at the failure point. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over- saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceedthe capacity of the intersection. Insufficient gaps of suitable size exist to allow minor traffic to cross the intersection safely.

F >80.0
300
Section , Item B
1-9 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-2
Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions (Highway Capacity Manual)
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (seq/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION A No delay for stop-controlled approaches. 0 - 10.0
B Describes operations with minor delay,
©j
©
>10.0-15.0
C Describes operations with moderate delays.
©j
>15.0-25.0
D Describes operations with some delays.
©I
©
>25.0-35.0
E Describes operations with high delays and long queues. ©j
©
>35.0-50.0
F Describes operations with extreme congestion, with very high delays and long queuesunacceptable to most drivers.
©J
o
>50.0
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (seq/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION A No delay for stop-controlled approaches. 0 - 10.0
B Describes operations with minor delay,
©j
©
>10.0-15.0
C Describes operations with moderate delays.
©j
>15.0-25.0
D Describes operations with some delays.
©I
©
>25.0-35.0
E Describes operations with high delays and long queues. ©j
©
>35.0-50.0
F Describes operations with extreme congestion, with very high delays and long queuesunacceptable to most drivers.
©J
o
>50.0
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
301
Section , Item B
1-10 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-3
Roadway Segment
Level of Service Definitions
(Highway Capacity Manual)

LEVEL OF SERVICE l DEFINITION
A
st Represents free flow. Individual vehicles are virtually unaffected by the presenceof others in the traffic stream.

B
Is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other vehicles in the = ta __ traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedomto select desired speedsis _ ' relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to ' fcs ’ H maneuver. *
=
'
C
-UK OL
Is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of therange of flow in which the operation of individual vehicles becomes significantly affected by interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream, r D
Ha Is a crowded segment of roadway with a large number of vehicles restricting mobility and a stableflow. Speedand freedom to maneuver are „ r - : severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience.
a
E
r- 1
Representsoperating conditions at or near the level capacity. Alt speeds w , are reducedto a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow M will causebreakdowns in traffic movement.
*
Is used to define forced or breakdown flow (stop-and-go gridlock). This m condition exists when the amount of traffic approaches a point where the amount of traffic exceeds the amount that can travel to a destination. __i -7 r Operations within the queues are characterized by stop and go waves,and jgr they are extremely unstable. z? W
LEVEL OF SERVICE l DEFINITION
A
st Represents free flow. Individual vehicles are virtually unaffected by the presenceof others in the traffic stream.

B
Is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other vehicles in the = ta __ traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedomto select desired speedsis _ ' relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to ' fcs ’ H maneuver. *
=
'
C
-UK OL
Is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of therange of flow in which the operation of individual vehicles becomes significantly affected by interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream, r D
Ha Is a crowded segment of roadway with a large number of vehicles restricting mobility and a stableflow. Speedand freedom to maneuver are „ r - : severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience.
a
E
r- 1
Representsoperating conditions at or near the level capacity. Alt speeds w , are reducedto a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow M will causebreakdowns in traffic movement.
*
Is used to define forced or breakdown flow (stop-and-go gridlock). This m condition exists when the amount of traffic approaches a point where the amount of traffic exceeds the amount that can travel to a destination. __i -7 r Operations within the queues are characterized by stop and go waves,and jgr they are extremely unstable. z? W
302
Section , Item B
1-11 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-4
Peak Hour Two-Way Segment Volume Thresholds

Lanes Median A B C D E
2 Divided N/A N/A 440 1,640 1,860
4 Divided N/A N/A 1,000 3,470 3,730
2 TWTL N/A N/A 420 1,550 1,760
4 TWTL N/A N/A 940 3,290 3,550
2 Undivided N/A N/A 340 1,270 1,480
4 Undivided N/A N/A 770 2,740 2,980
2 TWTL N/A N/A 420 1,550 1,760
4 TWTL N/A N/A 940 3,290 3,550
2 Undivided N/A N/A 340 1,270 1,480
4 Undivided N/A N/A 770 2,740 2,980
2 Undivided N/A N/A 700 930 1,000
2 Divided N/A N/A 700 930 1,000
Level of Service

COLLECTORS
N/A- LOS is not achievable because of the type of facility LOCAL

ARTERIAL
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
303
Section , Item B
2-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions

2.0 Existing Conditions

2.1 Existing Traffic Counts and Roadway Geometrics
The first step toward assessing Project traffic impacts is to assess existing traffic conditions.

Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements were collected at each study intersection by National Data and Surveying Services. Intersection turning movement counts were conducted for the peak hour periods of 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM for study intersections on either Tuesday, November 14, 2023, or Thursday, February 22, 2024. Traffic count data worksheets are provided in Appendix B. The day on which counts were taken is representative of typical traffic volumes within the study area. Schools were in session and the weather was mild.

2.2 Existing Functional Roadway Classification System
Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the type of service they are intended to provide. Fundamental to this process is the recognition that individual streets and highways do not serve travel independently in any major way. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads.

The current hierarchical system of roadways consists of the following six (6) basic classifications:
 Freeways – Limited-access facilities designed for high-speed regional mobility. Freeways may include up to eight lanes (four lanes in each direction). SR 99, in the Project study area, is classified as a freeway.
 Expressways –High-speed, two- to six-lane divided roadways, primarily servicing through and cross-town traffic, with no direct access to abutting property and at-grade intersections located at approximately half-mile intervals. Golden State Boulevard is classified as an Expressway in the study area per the City of Fowler General Plan Circulation Diagram.  Arterial – Typically four- to six-lane divided roadways, with somewhat limited access to abutting properties, and with the primary purpose of moving traffic within and between community plan areas and to and from freeways and expressways. The portions of American Avenue and Clovis Avenue within the City of Fowler Planning Area are classified as Arterials.  Collectors – Two to four-lane undivided roadways, with the primary function of connecting local streets and arterials and neighborhood traffic generators and providing access to abutting properties. Lincoln Avenue, Fowler Avenue, Clayton Avenue, and Merced Street are classified as a Collector in the study area per the City of Fowler General Plan.

 Local Streets – Two- to three-lane public or private roadways designed to provide direct access to properties while discouraging traffic between major streets. They are intended to carry low volumes of traffic and support unrestricted on-street parking.

VlWM rrowowMnme
304
Section , Item B
2-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions

2.3 Affected Streets and Highways
Street and highway intersections and segments near and adjacent to the Project site were analyzed to determine levels of service utilizing HCM-based methodologies described previously.

The study intersections and street and highway segments included in this TIS are listed below.

Intersections

1. American Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

2. American Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

3. Jefferson Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

4. Clovis Avenue and Jefferson Avenue

5. Clovis Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

6. Fowler Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

7. Clayton Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

8. Clayton Avenue and Fowler Avenue

9. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 NB Ramps

10. Clayton Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

11. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 SB Ramps

12. Adams Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

13. Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

14. Merced Street and Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp

15. Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps
Roadway Segments
 Fowler Avenue between:
 Adam Avenue and Clayton Avenue
 Clayton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
 Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Avenue
 Clayton Avenue between:
 Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue
 Lincoln Avenue between:
 Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
 Jefferson Avenue between:
 Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
The existing lane geometry at study area intersections is shown in Figure 2-1. All the study intersections are currently unsignalized except for two intersections (American Avenue at SR 99 NB On Ramp and Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp) which do not have any intersection controls. Figures 2-2 and 2-3 show existing traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours in the study area.

VlWM rrowowMnme
305
Section , Item B
2-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Existing LaneGeometry
Jefferson Ave
Lincoln Ave

8. Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 Amenrarr Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp •1 Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave 15 Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps v4?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave ijJi 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd RoI
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Clovis Ave Frontage

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
1 1 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
*ittr
LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
r Lane Geometry
Study Roadway Segment
JU
4*
HIL
Private Dwv •
306
Section , Item B
2-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing AM PeakHour Traffic
Figure
2-2
Lincoln Ave
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Aye F
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp "T to CO — 279
75 82
124
122
46 175
102
226 119
v4?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave o o
cxi cn
IIL
t ___26 I 16
©
*111- o co m
in
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
-

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps <-A------- 19 « ---------702 x ~416
nr coco
r- CO
f — 29
CM
04 O'
JI
* ------- 42 •
37 ---i
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
t- -r- in
rr ID
v- in
25 t
17 ---------
58 1
ittr 04 o>
co
04 LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
r Lane Geometry
Study Roadway Segment ' letterson AV" and Golden Sialo Blvd CMO)
’T- m> JU
20 ___J nil
o co
r- coCM
•1 Joftenion Avn and Clovts AVe
r- OJTJ hL
Private Dwv
4~° ©
H
nil-CO r- cnin
ttcwotwcnu«
307
Section , Item B
2-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing PM PeakHour Traffic
Figure
2-3
Incoln Av<
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Frcmlaoe
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 2
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp T co <o r- 171
63 139
65 63 ■65
nlirCM O

O V- CN
116
203
247 65
24 170
336
■1 Jotfer on Ave and ClovtS Ave
0 0
$
Private Dwy
\/rpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave CM03
r- co
to
IIL co co nlF* O N LO
LO
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
r- tn CXio
co 41 ' x 573
nil X' to tO 03
• r u
’T <D — CD
Ji
< -------33 •
62— I
LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
r Lane Geometry
Study Roadway Segment
125 ------->
*r co m- CM
' lefferson /W" and Golden Sialo Blvd
to 0) co
J II
40 J
31 I nil O
CXI
ttcwotwcnu«
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing PM PeakHour Traffic
Figure
2-3
Incoln Av<
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Frcmlaoe
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 2
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp T co <o r- 171
63 139
65 63 ■65
nlirCM O

2.4 Level of Service

2.4.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis
All intersection LOS analyses were estimated using Synchro 12 Software. Various roadway geometrics, traffic volumes, and properties (peak hour factors, storage pocket length, etc) were input into the Synchro 12 Software program to accurately determine the travel delay and LOS for each study scenario. The intersection LOS and delays reported represent the HCM 6th Edition outputs. Synchro assumptions, listed below, show the various Synchro inputs and methodologies used in the analysis.
 Lane Geometry
 Storage lengths for turn lanes for existing intersections were obtained from aerial photos and rounded to the nearest 25 feet
 VRPA conducted a field study of the specified intersections and segments to verify lane geometry and intersection control as well as to obtain other pertinent data.  Traffic Conditions
 Peak hour factors (PHF) for each intersection approach were obtained from the traffic counts discussed in Section 2.1 and were utilized for Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. For all future scenarios, a PHF of 0.92 was applied unless the existing PHF was greater than 0.92. The value of 0.92 was used because it is the default value recommended in the HCM.
 Heavy vehicle percentages were based on the field traffic counts.  Roadway link speed limits were observed in the field and input into the Synchro network to determine roadway link speeds
 Two of the study intersections function without a traffic control which prevents Synchro from generating a delay since synchro does not support intersections without a traffic control. As a result, a ‘dummy leg’ with a stop control and no volumes was input into the Synchro model at American Avenue at SR 99 NB On Ramp and Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp.

Results of the analysis show that a majority of the study intersections currently operate at or better than the City of Fowler LOS criteria. Clovis Avenue at SR 99 SB On Ramp is currently operating at LOS F. Table 2-1 shows the intersection LOS for the existing conditions. Synchro 11 (HCM 6th Edition) Worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

2.4.2 Queuing Analysis
Table 2-2 provides a queue length summary for left and right turn lane approaches at study intersections. As shown in Table 2-2, existing traffic at the westbound left approach for the Merced Street and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Avenue intersection exceeds the existing 50-foot storage pocket.

VlWM rrowowMnme
309
Section , Item B
2-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions

2.4.3 Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Results of the AM and PM peak hour LOS segment analysis along the existing street and highway system are reflected in Table 2-3. The performance criteria used for evaluating volumes and capacities on the road and highway system for this study were estimated using Table 5.14-2 from the City of Fresno General Plan and Development Code Update Master Environmental Impact Report included in Appendix A. Results of the analysis show that all of the study roadway segments meet the City of Fowler’s minimum acceptable level of service criteria during both the AM and PM peak hour.

2.5 Study Area Collision Analysis
The Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) provided by University of California, Berkeley was used to evaluate traffic collisions in the study area. TIMS utilizes geocoded data provided by the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). SWITRS is a tool used by California Highway Patrol (CHP) and other Allied Agencies throughout California and includes various types of statistical reports and data. The database serves as a means to collect and process data gathered from a collision scene. Information from the TIMS database shows that approximately 176 injury accidents and 9 fatal accidents have occurred throughout the study area during the 5- year period between January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2022. A graphical representation of traffic collisions throughout the study area for the 5-year period reflected above is provided in Figure 2-4. More detailed collision data is provided in Appendix D. The Fresno County region had approximately 15,033 injury accidents and 737 fatal accidents over the same timeframe referenced above. Injury and fatal accidents in the study area represent 1.2% of incidents that occurred in the Fresno County Region. Rear-End collisions represent 45% of the accidents in the study area while broadside collisions represent 23%. Unsafe Speed ranked as the highest primary crash factor at 44% of accidents in the study area. Automobile right-of-way was the second highest primary crash factor at 16%.

VlWM rrowowMnme
310
Section , Item B
2-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Table 2-1
Existing Intersection Operations

DELAY LOS
AM 11.7 B
PM 12.0 B
AM 7.8 A
PM 7.7 A
AM 12.4 B
PM 13.7 B
AM 26.7 D
PM 27.2 D
AM 16.3 C
PM 24.1 C
AM 10.2 B
PM 10.1 B
AM 12.1 B
PM 15.3 C
AM 9.0 A
PM 9.2 A
AM 19.0 C
PM 16.6 C
AM 9.1 A
PM 10.7 B
AM >50.0 F
PM >50.0 F
AM 9.6 A
PM 10.3 B
AM 0.0 A
PM 0.0 A
AM 20.9 C
PM 15.2 C
AM 21.0 C
PM 17.5 C
DELAY is measured in seconds
LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded Merced St a nd SR 99 NB Ra mps
D
D
D
All Way Stop
One Way Stop
Merced St a nd SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
15 10
11 12
13 14
Adams Ave SR 99 NB On Ra mps No Control (1) D
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 D
Two Way Stop C
Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp One Way Stop D
Two-way Stop D
One Way Stop
One Way Stop
Cla yton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB On Ramp
D
Clovis Ave and Jeffers on Ave One Way Stop D
Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave One Way Stop D
Golden State Blvd a nd Jeffers on Ave One Way Stop
Fowler Ave and Lincoln Ave

CONTROL TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING
(1) Synchro does n’t generate a delay for inters ections without a traffic control. A ‘dummy leg’ with a stop control and no volumes wa s input into the Synchro model.

Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps One Way Stop D

INTERSECTION
For all-way s top controlled intersections , delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For two-way and one-way s top controlled intersections , delay results show the delay for the wors t movement.

Golden State Blvd a nd Clayton Ave Two Way Stop D
Fowler Ave and Cl ayton Ave One Way Stop C
American Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp No Control (1) D
American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
VlWM rrowowMni«c
311
Section , Item B
2-9 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Table 2-2
Existing Queuing Operations
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
SB Right 225 18 3
NB Left 150 3 0
SB Right 150 0 0
NB Left 150 0 0
SB Left 150 0 0
NB Left 75 0 0
SB Left 150 3 5
SB Right 125 0 0
NB Left 150 13 5
WB Left 50 10 5
SB Right 50 0 0
NB Left 50 0 0
SB Left 125 63 48
EB Left 75 83 203
EB Right 150 5 23
NB Right 100 13 28
WB Left 50 80 60
EB Left 50 15 15
Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes exceedance

INTERSECTION

EXISTING QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)

EXISTING
Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave
7 Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
3 Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave
4 Clovis Ave and Jefferson Ave
5 9 Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
11 Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB On Ramp
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
14 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
VlWM rrowowMni«c
312
Section , Item B
2-10 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Table 2-3
Existing Segment Operations
VOLUME LOS AM 125 C
PM 124 C AM 175 C
PM 144 C AM 93 C
PM 129 C AM 10 C
PM 11 C AM 88 C
PM 101 C AM 8 C
PM 3 C
LOS = Level of Se rvi ce / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded C
C
C
C
C
2 Lanes Divided C
2 Lanes Divided
2 Lanes Undivided
Jefferson Avenue
Lincon Avenue
Clayton Avenue
Adams Avenue and Clayton Avenue
Clayton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
2 Lanes Divided
2 Lanes Undivided
Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue
Collector
Collector
Local
Local
Collector
Local
Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Avenue
2 Lanes Divided
Fowler Avenue

STREET SEGMENT

SEGMENT

DESCRIPTION

TARGET LOS PEAK HOUR

EXISTING ROADWAY

FUNCTIONAL

CLASSIFICATION
VlWM rrowowMni«c
313
Section , Item B
2-11 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Study Area Collision Map (01/01/2018 - 12/31/2022)
Figure
2-4
1 Broadside
Accidents
North
Armstrong Ave
Fowler Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Ave
LEGEND
til
ro
ro
£o
c=
§
Head-On
Sideswipe
Rear End
Adams Ave Broadside
Hit Object
Vehicle/Pedestrian 0) <
£CD
C
c
0)
txt
Overturned
S
o
o
Other
Sumner Ave I
>
1 3
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Study Area Collision Map (01/01/2018 - 12/31/2022)
Figure
2-4
1 Broadside
Accidents
North
Armstrong Ave
Fowler Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Ave
LEGEND
til
ro
ro
£o
c=
§
Head-On
Sideswipe
Rear End
Adams Ave Broadside
Hit Object
Vehicle/Pedestrian 0) <
£CD
C
c
0)
txt
Overturned
S
o
o
Other
Sumner Ave I
>
1 3
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.
314
Section , Item B
3-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts

3.0 Traffic Impacts
This chapter provides an assessment of traffic and the impact on the surrounding street system.

3.1 Trip Generation
The Annexation/Prezone proposes a prezone to M-1 and R-1-7. The Project also proposes a 44- lot industrial subdivision on 45.04 acres of land. The trip generation was based on the highest level of trip generation of all feasible uses at the Project site as determined in discussions with City of Fowler staff. The result of these discussions were the assumption of use of the General Light Industrial trip generation category with a floor area ration of 0.20, resulting in 392,000 sq. ft. of development. There is an area shown on the project site that indicates a proposal for residential use, but this is not considered to be part of the project for trip generation purposes.

The considerations described above led to the recommended trip generation for weekday AM (7:00-9:00am) and PM (4:00-6:00pm) peak hours shown in Table 3-1. Any exceedance of the values shown in Table 3-1 would require consideration of a revised traffic study.

Table 3-1
Project Trip Generation

3.2 Trip Distribution
Project trip distribution percentages for the Existing Plus Project and Horizon Year scenarios is shown in Figure 3-1. These percentages are based upon knowledge of the study area, engineering judgement, prevailing traffic patterns in the study area, major routes, population centers, and other existing developments.

Site access will be provided at two Project Driveways along Clayton Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue. At the south end of the Project, Lynn Avenue dead ends at the south property line. Regional access to the site is provided via SR 99.

DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT)
IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL General Light Industrial
(Auto Trips) 110 392 ksf 3.638 1,426 0.730 88:12 253 33 286 0.640 14:86 34 217 251 General Light Industrial
(Truck Trips) 110 392 ksf 0.250 98 0.010 50:50 2 2 4 0.010 50:50 2 2 4 1,524 255 35 290 36 219 255
1,720 259 39 298 40 223 263
Source: Generation factors from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.

Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.

PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent
ITE Land Use Code

TOTAL TRIP GENERATION

TOTAL TRIP GENERATION (PCE)
LAND USE Size WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME RATE IN:OUT SPLIT VOLUME RATE IN:OUT SPLIT VOLUME l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 315
Section , Item B
3-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Trip Distribution
Figure
3-1
American Ave
0) <■O
to
>1
c
15%
<
o
cn
co
§
E
<
5% 5%
V)
Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave Peach Ave
5% 5%
Lincoln Ave
5%
5%
Clayton Ave
<u
<
roS
ro
5 a>
5%
5% 5% Adams Ave
North
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
Trip Distribution %
------- Study RoadwaySegment
Sumner Ave 15%
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
V'frP4 OOPWtMM
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Trip Distribution
Figure
3-1
American Ave
0) <■O
to
>1
c
15%
<
o
cn
co
§
E
<
5% 5%
V)
Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave Peach Ave
5% 5%
Lincoln Ave
5%
5%
Clayton Ave
<u
<
roS
ro
5 a>
5%
5% 5% Adams Ave
North
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
Trip Distribution %
------- Study RoadwaySegment
Sumner Ave 15%
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
V'frP4 OOPWtMM 316
Section , Item B
3-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts

3.3 Project Traffic
Project traffic as shown in Table 3-1 was distributed to the roadway system using the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 3-1. The graphical representation of the resulting AM and PM peak hour Project trips used is shown in Figures 3-2 and 3-3.

3.4 Existing Plus Project Conditions
An Existing Plus Project Scenario was analyzed to include existing traffic plus traffic generated by the Project. The peak hour trips for the Project were added to existing traffic volumes to analyze the impacts. The resulting traffic is shown in Figures 3-4 and 3-5.

3.5 Horizon Year Without Project Conditions
The impacts of the Project were analyzed considering future traffic conditions, approximately twenty (20) years in the future or the year 2044. The levels of traffic expected in the horizon year relate to the cumulative effect of traffic increases resulting from the implementation of the General Plans of local agencies, including the City of Fowler. Traffic conditions without the Project in the Horizon Year were estimated based upon the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) regional travel model. In cases where the model showed less than 2% growth per year, traffic conditions without the Project in the Horizon Year were estimated based upon a 2% per year growth factor. Traffic conditions resulting from this scenario are shown in Figures 3-6 and 3-7.

3.6 Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions
The addition of Project trips, which were distributed to the roadway system using the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 3-1 (Section 3.3), were added to Horizon Year Without Project traffic volumes. Traffic conditions resulting from this scenario are shown in Figures 3-8 and 3-9.

3.7 Impacts

3.7.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Table 3-2 provides the intersection level of service analysis for the study intersections considering the study scenarios discussed above. Potential roadway improvement measures are discussed in Chapter 4 of this report. Results of the analysis show that the Project will contribute to an unacceptable LOS at eight (8) of the study intersections when comparing the Horizon Year scenarios.
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 317
Section , Item B
3-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts

3.7.2 Queuing Analysis
Table 3-3 provides a queue length summary for left and right turn lane approaches at study intersections. The queue lengths presented in Table 3-3 represent the 95 percentile queue lengths for the respective lane movements based on the Synchro traffic signal timing program.

Results of the queuing analysis shows that existing queue storage will be adequate to serve expected peak hour queue lengths at most of the intersections. However, storage will be insufficient at two (2) of the study intersection considering the Horizon Year scenario.

3.7.3 Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Results of the AM and PM peak hour LOS segment analysis along the existing street and highway system are reflected in Table 3-4. Results of the analysis show that all of the study roadway segments meet the City of Fowler’s minimum acceptable level of service criteria during both the AM and PM peak hour.
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 318
Section , Item B
3-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-2
J American Ave
Z£
1 I
I
|I
i I
I
I
I
1 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave arid SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 6 0
?
[stop] 0
39 ,'fl 0
0 ■1Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave
0 , <o 0
0 <d
0□
Private Owy
o 0 o
0 0
0 - o e>
c
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ono t 0 *7----- 0
j 0
0 t 0 —
0 | O CXI o
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps I 10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ 52 LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 3 lefferson AVf and Golden Sialo Blvd O CD
CO
Jll
O to
»•
H
0?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
VfrP4 rwtwtMM t*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-2
J American Ave
Z£
1 I
I
|I
i I
I
I
I
1 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave arid SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 6 0
?
[stop] 0
39 ,'fl 0
0 ■1Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave
0 , <o 0
0 <d
0□
Private Owy
o 0 o
0 0
0 - o e>
c
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ono t 0 *7----- 0
j 0
0 t 0 —
0 | O CXI o
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps I 10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ 52 LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 3 lefferson AVf and Golden Sialo Blvd O CD
CO
Jll
O to
»•
H
0?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
VfrP4 rwtwtMM t*c 319
Section , Item B
3-6 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-3
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd 0 0
0 0
0 0
■
1 American Ave end SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB Un Ramp 33 0 O O ID < LEGEND
Study Intersection
12 0
0 Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
Study RoadwaySegment
u 0 ol/»P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 i
CMO
11 J1

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
r-~ CO mrr
41 8 • . 0 ------ 12 ____*
o
MolsB
1 letferson AV"
■
and Goklen Slain Blvd

O CMO HIL
Private Dwy
-H
•
H O T~ O
V rwtwtMM t*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-3
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd 0 0
0 0
0 0
■
1 American Ave end SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB Un Ramp 33 0 O O ID < LEGEND
Study Intersection
12 0
0 Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
Study RoadwaySegment
u 0 ol/»P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 i
CMO
11 J1

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
r-~ CO mrr
41 8 • . 0 ------ 12 ____*
o
MolsB
1 letferson AV"
■
and Goklen Slain Blvd

O CMO HIL
Private Dwy
-H
•
H O T~ O
V rwtwtMM t*c 320
Section , Item B
3-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Clayton Avo A
i
5 1
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Avs 6. Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd COo
to co
ilL
t ___26
L 16 0
w- O CD
CO 9
------32
t ___ 2 ••------- 150
<-j— 18
f 29 •H
•
o ooin
in © 0 f 26 ■/ »
1/ ; EMn o
v COco
0 t 1 ------(a
o i •II* O CD CO
cp in CM A
North
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps «— '■--------- 31 « ------------- 710
A.4G8
111
co r -
*“ CM
• r — 29 10 r-•fl124
102
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave

T- T-(O
rr m in
• 103 t 17 — 5*
58 1 *itbo~ CMCD
CO
CM
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 279
75 74
132
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
© Stop Sign
Lane Geometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
241
Private Dwy
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

V'frP4 rwtwtMM
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Clayton Avo A
i
5 1
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Avs 6. Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd COo
to co
ilL
t ___26
L 16 0
w- O CD
CO 9
------32
t ___ 2 ••------- 150
<-j— 18
f 29 •H
•
o ooin
in © 0 f 26 ■/ »
1/ ; EMn o
v COco
0 t 1 ------(a
o i •II* O CD CO
cp in CM A
North
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps «— '■--------- 31 « ------------- 710
A.4G8
111
co r -
*“ CM
• r — 29 10 r-•fl124
102
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave

V'frP4 rwtwtMM 321
Section , Item B
3-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-5

5. Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave T Co
r- CO to
UL co co
o co1-0 (Ocxj
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd t_ o T~~ 39130
f 157 T~i
• e
0 f 3 ------V* 0 i 4b
s ”
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ Clovis Ave Frontage
co■>-
4 i <Dbp
099 ---------•
f 6 ------
581
in <DOCM ® r'“
t ___ 14
« ------208
33 •
H
62 ----1
11 SR 99 SB R amps and Clovis Ave 12 AdamsAve and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp »- CO CM
CO r- r- * ------ 74
t 171
63 77 t 24 ___
2 * 170 | 2------1
201 ~~~T
10 J/
127 ------* nrcor-<N
349 ------* 209
1 American Ave -and SR 99 SB Oft Ramp ----- 34
I--- 79
•
« ------65
247 ------»
1 letterscin 7W>and Golden stale Blvd
IOuo<n
co •Ml
40 J
31 I
nil
O’ K
V- CO
CXJ
LEGEND
Project Site
© Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment <1 Jefferson Ave and Clovis AV? o io cm
MIL
Private Dwy w O O
0 H
nlPCOb- O Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

V'frP4 rwtwtMM
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-5

V'frP4 rwtwtMM 322
Section , Item B
3-9 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-6
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
o tn <-■
5 IIL
t ____ 39 I M
•
1th
o cm to CM
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave
48 12 Jefferson Ave
0 39
25 CO(D CD
Iincoln Ave T CO

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 415
111 107
181
nib <jp tn ro
v152 37
25 336
l/RP4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave ------- 28
* ---------- 1043
•618
175 ------ 207 ___* — 43
68 f 260
_* ____122
184
4 Jefferson Ave and Clovis AV?
4K
Private Dwv o o tn
•
H
COTLEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
*;s LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
26 « ____ 746
nil co ’M- COCO
co
t©
43 — ! 36 |
nrwwtMM t*c 323
Section , Item B
3-10 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-7
J American Ave <
s
I
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
254
94 207
97 94
niF* COO> D O 6i t- 172
302
367 97
36 253
499 186
15 Merced Street end SR 99 NB Ramps
o t- co hil
1 0
0 Private Owy
0 0
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
* ------ 850* ------ 58
r NJ NJ
*ltb
ctnsCXIco
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 851
36 Adams Ave
I
I
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 1 iatterspn 7\V" and Golden Slain Blvd 111 o co CMO) 61 i
l/RP4 TECHNOIOGIEI. INC
V'frP4 rwtwtMM t*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-7
J American Ave <
s
I
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
254
94 207
97 94
niF* COO> D O 6i t- 172
302
367 97
36 253
499 186
15 Merced Street end SR 99 NB Ramps
o t- co hil
1 0
0 Private Owy
0 0
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
* ------ 850* ------ 58
r NJ NJ
*ltb
ctnsCXIco
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 851
36 Adams Ave
I
I
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 1 iatterspn 7\V" and Golden Slain Blvd 111 o co CMO) 61 i
l/RP4 TECHNOIOGIEI. INC
V'frP4 rwtwtMM t*c 324
Section , Item B
3-11 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-8
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
co tn
co ■tr
k
t ____ 39
I 24
•
ItbO CT> CM
f?
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ’ 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd ij 48 12
0 39
25 00 COCD
r- tr CO
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
3 8
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 415
111 128
184
• ------ 109
181
S8
299
152
351
l/RP4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps ISOl ---------* OF nil tn
r- co
t- CM — 43
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
CO
CDCM — CMCO
•
115 t 25 -------
z -»
86 j
co co
xr v- co
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
190 — »
nr
t— CD
in
3 lefterson AVi- and Golden Stale Blvd
to in CMco
-J 1 1
nilco o COCD
CO
.© 43 — I
36 |
A
Private Dwv oom
e
g T- co
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-8
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
co tn
co ■tr
k
t ____ 39
I 24
•
ItbO CT> CM
f?
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ’ 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd ij 48 12
0 39
25 00 COCD
r- tr CO
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
3 8
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 415
111 128
184
• ------ 109
181
S8
299
152
351
l/RP4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps ISOl ---------* OF nil tn
r- co
t- CM — 43
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
CO
CDCM — CMCO
•
115 t 25 -------
z -»
86 j
co co
xr v- co
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
190 — »
nr
t— CD
in
3 lefterson AVi- and Golden Stale Blvd
to in CMco
-J 1 1
nilco o COCD
CO
.© 43 — I
36 |
A
Private Dwv oom
e
g T- co
325
Section , Item B
3-12 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-9

6. Lincoln Ave and F owler Ave
43 0
74 21
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
2 American Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB Un Ramp 254
94 240
97 105 LEGEND
172 Study Intersection
308
367
512
------ Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
Lane Geometry
Study RoadwaySegment
i/rpa TECHNOtOGIES. /WC
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd

O CMCXI CD CO
Jib
t 158
•
0 f 4 ------ o i 2 f
602
18"'
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
* ------ 852
* ------ 58
r
•
*]IPO
coco
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ Clovis Ave Frontage

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps *1
- 107
* --------- 944
101
— 303 ___.
$
1 1 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
to r-- cij C to r- CM(0
109 t 36- 2 »
253 j 3 \
299— _»
15 |
188 ------* t ___eos r*
1 tofferson AV1
i> mid Golden Stele Blvd
to „ < ____ 1127
86 ___J
61 I nil
o to CMCM
CO
o co hil
Private Dwv
T- O O
• 1 f 0 ------<->
o ; 4 -J
1 1149 ------* 0 “T*
V'RPA rHWWMWtir*c 326
Section , Item B
3-13 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Table 3-2
Intersection Operations

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 12.3 B 13.4 B 14.2 B
PM 12.1 B 14.1 B 14.3 B AM 7.8 A 7.9 A 7.9 A
PM 7.7 A 7.8 A 7.8 A
AM 12.9 B >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
PM 14.0 B >50.0 F * >50.0 F * AM 27.1 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F * PM 27.5 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F * AM 16.4 C 32.4 D 32.8 D
PM 24.6 C >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
AM 10.4 B 11.2 B 11.3 B
PM 10.2 B 10.9 B 11.0 B
AM 13.2 B 31.1 D 36.1 E
PM 16.9 C >50.0 F * >50.0 F
AM 9.3 A 9.0 A 9.3 A
PM 9.3 A 9.5 A 9.5 A
AM 21.2 C 44.6 E * >50.0 F *
PM 17.5 C 29.0 D 31.2 D
AM 9.6 A 9.4 A 10.0 B
PM 10.9 B 11.0 B 11.1 B AM >50.0 F * >50.0 F * >50.0 F PM >50.0 F * >50.0 F >50.0 F AM 9.7 A 10.4 B 10.5 B
PM 10.4 B 12.1 B 12.1 B AM 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A
PM 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A
AM 21.2 C >50.0 F >50.0 F PM 16.1 C >50.0 F >50.0 F AM 22.8 C >50.0 F >50.0 F PM 17.9 C >50.0 F >50.0 F DELAY is meas ured in seconds LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS s tandard has been exceeded * Does not meet peak hour signal warrants.
10 11
12 13
14 5
6 7
8 9
1 2
3 4

INTERSECTION
Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps One Way Stop D
(1) Synchro does n’t generate a delay for intersections without a traffic control. A ‘dummy leg’ with a stop control and no volumes was input into the Synchro model. 15 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave All Way Stop D Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp One Way Stop D
Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps One Way Stop D
Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp One Way Stop D
Adams Ave SR 99 NB On Ramps No Control(1) D
Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave One Way Stop D
Clovis Ave and Jeffers on Ave One Way Stop D

EXISTING PLUS

PROJECT
American Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp No Control (1) D

CONTROL TARGET

LOS PEAK HOUR

HORIZON YEAR

WITHOUT PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT
American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp Two-way Stop D
D
Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave One Way Stop
Fowler Ave and Lincoln Ave Two Way Stop
Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave Two Way Stop
Fowler Ave and Clayton Ave One Way Stop
Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps D
CD
C
For all-way stop controlled intersections , delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For two-way and one-way s top controlled i ntersections, delay results s how the delay for the worst movement.

One Way Stop
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 327
Section , Item B
3-14 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Table 3-3
Queuing Operations
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
SB Right 225 18 3 25 5 25 5
NB Left 150 3 0 5 5 5 5
SB Right 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB Left 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB Left 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB Left 75 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB Left 150 3 5 5 10 5 10
SB Right 125 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB Left 150 13 8 33 13 33 15
WB Left 50 10 8 35 18 40 20
SB Right 50 0 0 5 8 8 8
NB Left 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB Left 125 65 58 200 98 208 113
EB Left 75 315 280 245 448 510 503
EB Right 150 5 23 10 35 10 35
NB Right 100 13 28 20 48 20 50
WB Left 50 85 80 263 210 275 270
EB Left 50 15 15 35 30 35 33
Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes exceedance

INTERSECTION

EXISTING QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)

EXISTING PLUS

PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

WITHOUT PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
3 Golden Sta te Bl vd and Jefferson Ave
4 Clovis Ave a nd Jefferson Ave
5 Clovis Ave a nd Lincoln Ave
7 Golden Sta te Bl vd and Clayton Ave
9 Clovis Ave a nd SR 99 NB Ramps
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
11 Clovis Ave a nd SR 99 SB On Ramp
15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
14 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 328
Section , Item B
3-15 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Table 3-4
Roadway Segment Operations

VOLUME LOS VOLUME LOS VOLUME LOS AM 140 C 186 C 201 C
PM 137 C 185 C 198 C AM 190 C 260 C 275 C
PM 157 C 214 C 227 C AM 108 C 137 C 152 C
PM 142 C 191 C 204 C AM 110 C 14 C 114 C
PM 250 C 16 C 261 C AM 88 C 131 C 131 C
PM 101 C 150 C 150 C AM 8 C 11 C 11 C
PM 3 C 4 C 4 C

STREET SEGMENT SEGMENT DESCRIPTION

ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

TARGET LOS PEAK HOUR HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT EXISTING PLUS PROJECT HORIZON YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT Fowler Avenue 2 Lanes Undivided Local C
Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Collector C Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue Adams Avenue and Clayton Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Collector C Clayton Avenue Lincon Avenue
Jefferson Avenue LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standa rd has been e xceeded Clayton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Collector C Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue 2 Lanes Undivided Local C Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Local C l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 329
Section , Item B
4-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements

4.0 Roadway Improvements

4.1 Roadway Improvements
As discussed in Section 3.0 (Impacts), roadway improvements may be desirable to support the development of the Project, as well as to accommodate traffic increases related to overall growth in the study area. The Project site, currently outside of the City of Fowler limits but within the City of Fowler’s sphere of influence, proposes land uses of Light Industrial and Medium Low Residential. The Project proposes a 44-lot industrial subdivision on the area with a land use designation of Light Industrial, which is consistent with the General Plan. The Annexation/ Prezone of the subject property would affect traffic operations that may trigger the need for improvements and/or other measures within the study area to address traffic operations. It is recommended that roadway improvements or traffic impact fees be evaluated at the time that additional developments are presented for implementation.

Considering the criteria provided in Section 1.3 (Policies To Maintain Level of Service) and the results presented in Section 3.0, the following improvements may be implemented to alleviate roadway deficiencies identified in this Transportation Impact Study.

INTERSECTIONS

3. Golden State Boulevard and Jefferson Avenue
Recommended improvements:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Widen the eastbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)
Recommended improvements are not sufficient to alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization.

4. Clovis Avenue and Jefferson Avenue
No improvements are recommended.

The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under the Horizon Year scenarios. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection.
mwm.
330
Section , Item B
4-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements

5. Clovis Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
Recommended improvements:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)
Recommended improvements are not sufficient to alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization.

7. Clayton Avenue and Golden State Boulevard
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Horizon Year Without Project Conditions
The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under this scenario (PM Peak Hour only). However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. As a result, no improvements are recommended under this scenario.  Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions
o Install a traffic signal
o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a shared left-through lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)

9. SR 99 NB Ramps and Clovis Avenue
No improvements are recommended.

The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under the Horizon Year scenarios (AM Peak Hour only). However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection.

11. SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Avenue
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Existing Plus Project Conditions
mwm.
331
Section , Item B
4-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under this scenario. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. As a result, no improvements are recommended under this scenario.

 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic signal when warranted
o Widen the southbound approach to the intersection to include two left turn lanes, a through lane, and a shared through-right lane (adding one left turn lane) o Widen the eastbound approach to the intersection to include one left turn lane, one shared left-through lane, and one right turn lane (adding one left turn lane) Alternatively, a roundabout could be installed at the intersection which would achieve acceptable levels of service (LOS A for AM and PM peak hour) considering the roadway configuration notated below.
 Northbound approach – 2 lane entry: 1 left-through lane and 1 through-right lane  Southbound approach – 2 lane entry: 1 left-through lane and 1 through-right lane  Eastbound approach – 2 lane entry: 1 left lane and 1 through-right lane

14. Merced Street and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Avenue
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic signal when warranted
o Widen the northbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane with right-turn overlap phasing (adding one right turn lane with right-turn overlap phasing)
o Widen the southbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a shared through-right lane (adding one left turn lane)

15. Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic Signal when warranted
o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a through lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane).

The level of service resulting from the potential improvements identified above is shown in Table mwm.
332
Section , Item B
4-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
4-1 with recommended storage pocket lengths presented in Table 4-2. Figure 4-1 shows the recommended improvements at the respective intersections considering the Horizon Year Plus Project scenario.

It is recommended that the applicant’s team work with the City of Fowler and Caltrans to determine whether any of the improvements described above would be appropriate for implementation as a condition of the Project or would be justification for the payment of fair share fees.

4.2 Equitable Share Responsibility
The Project may be required to contribute a fair-share towards the costs of improvements that are identified for the Horizon Year scenario. The intent of determining the equitable responsibility for the improvements identified above for the Horizon Year scenario, is to provide a starting point for early discussions between the applicant and the City of Fowler/Caltrans to address traffic improvement equitability and to calculate the equitable share for mitigating traffic impacts. The formula used to calculate the equitable share responsibility to City of Fowler/Caltrans facilities is as follows:

Equitable Share = (Project Trips)/(Horizon Year Plus Project Traffic – Existing Traffic) Table 4-3 shows the Project’s equitable fair share responsibility on a percentage basis for improvements to City of Fowler/Caltrans facilities as described above. The equitable fair share responsibility shown in Table 4-3 is the result of LOS enhancements related to capacity. mwm.
333
Section , Item B
4-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Proposed LaneGeometry
Figure
4-1
American Ave 5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave
Adams Ave
Sumner Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 American Ave and SR 99 NB Qn Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp •1 Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave 15 Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd Jib
aaae
4b

10. Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 1
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 1 1 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
4 ILL
a ti __ Lib
LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
£ Lane Geometry — Study Roadway Segment
Roadway Improvement
$ New Traffic Signal
3 JeffersonAve and Gohlnr stale?Blvd
4IL
Private Dwv
334
Section , Item B
4-6 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Table 4-1
Intersection Operations with Roadway Improvements

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 12.9 B >50.0 F >50.0 F
PM 14.0 B >50.0 F >50.0 F
AM 27.1 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
PM 27.5 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
AM 16.4 C >50.0 F >50.0 F
PM 24.6 C >50.0 F >50.0 F
AM 13.2 B 31.1 D 3.8 A
PM 16.9 C >50.0 F * 6.3 A
AM 21.2 C 44.6 E * >50.0 F *
PM 17.5 C 29.0 D 31.2 D
AM >50.0 F * 10.8 B 11.9 B
PM >50.0 F * 10.8 B 11.1 B
AM 21.2 C 49.1 D 49.7 D
PM 16.1 C 28.4 C 30.6 C
AM 22.8 C 14.2 B 15.7 B
PM 17.9 C 14.4 B 15.1 B
DELAY is measured in seconds
LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded Recommended i mprovements are not sufficient to alleviate level of servi ce deficiencies at the inters ection. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies. However, this inters ection does not meet the peak hour traffic si gnal warrant becaus e the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. * No improvements are recommended as this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify si gnalization. 15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps D
14 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave D
11 Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps D
9 Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps D
7 Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave D
5 Clovis Ave and Lincol n Ave D
4 Clovis Ave and Jefferson Ave D
3 Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave D

HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING PLUS

PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

WITHOUT PROJECT
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
335
Section , Item B
4-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Table 4-2
Left Turn and Right Turn Storage Requirements
SB Right 225 225
NB Left 150 150
SB Right 150 150
EB Right -- 50
NB Left 150 150
SB Left 150 150
NB Left 75 75
SB Left 150 150
WB Right -- 50
SB Right 125 125
WB Right -- 125
NB Left 150 150
WB Left 50 50
SB Right 50 50
NB Left 50 50
SB Left 125 2 @ 125
EB Left 75 2 @ 75
EB Right 150 150
NB Right 100 100
NB Right -- 375
SB Left -- 350
WB Left 50 50
EB Left 50 50
WB Right -- 50
Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes new or increased storage length

INTERSECTION

EXISTING QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
3 Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave
4 Clovis Ave and Jefferson Ave
5 Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave
7 Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave
9 Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps

HORIZON YEAR

RECOMMENDED QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
14 Merced St/Fowler Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramps
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
11 Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB On Ramp
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
336
Section , Item B
4-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Table 4-3
Horizon Year Equitable Share Responsibility

INTERSECTION PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING PROJECT TRIPS HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT

FAIR SHARE

PERCENTAGE
AM 591 45 1,818 3.7%
PM 699 39 2,131 2.7%
AM 1,323 15 1,982 2.3%
PM 1,429 13 2,137 1.8%
AM 423 105 1,428 10.4%
PM 596 237 2,097 15.8%
AM 1,082 86 1,693 14.1%
PM 1,103 57 1,697 9.6%
AM 1,180 6 1,759 1.0%
PM 1,075 33 1,630 5.9%
AM 1,383 45 2,100 6.3%
PM 1,172 39 1,781 6.4%

14. Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave

15. Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps

7. Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave

11. Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps

5. Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave

3. Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave
337
Section , Item B
Clayton and Golden State Blvd. Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study Appendices
September 2024
Prepared for:

City of Fowler
Prepared by:

VRPA Technologies, Inc.
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105
Fresno, CA 93722
In Association With:

Precision Engineering
Vrpa TECHNOIOGIES. INC.
338
Section , Item B
Appendix A – Roadway Functional Class and
Peak Hour Level-of-Service Thresholds
339
Section , Item B
City of Fresno
General Plan and Development Code Update
Master Environmental Impact Report Transportation and Traffic It should be noted that this traditional methodology used to analyze the roadway system does not consider the potential impact on walking, bicycling, and transit. Pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders are all users of the roadway system but may not be fully recognized in the traffic operations analysis and the calculation of LOS. The LOSthresholds in Table 5.14-2 are based on driver's comfort and convenience. Identifying the need for roadway improvements based on the resulting roadway LOScan have unintended impacts to other modes such as increasing the walking time for pedestrians. In evaluating the roadway system, a lower vehicle LOSmay be desired when balanced against other community values related to resource protection, social equity, economic development, and consideration of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users.

Table 5.14-2: Roadway Functional Classand Peak Hour Level-of-Service Thresholds Functional Class Median Lanes
Peak Hour Level of Service Capacity Threshold

A B C D E
Freeway
N/A1 4 2,720 4,460 6,630 7,720 8,630
3+Aux 2,360 3,860 5,640 6,730 7,530
3 2,000 3,270 4,660 5,740 6,430
2+Aux 1,650 2,700 3,850 4,760 5,340
2 1,300 2,130 3,050 3,790 4,260
State Expressway
Divided 6 2,410 3,960 5,730 7,450 8,450
4 1,610 2,650 3,810 4,960 5,630
2 810 1,340 1,890 2,470 2,810
City Expressway
Raised
Median
6 1,860 6,170 6,520
5 1,520 5,110 5,430
4 1,180 4,050 4,340
2 520 1,910 2,160
Super Arterial
Raised
Median
6 4,910 6,240
5 4,040 5,195
4 3,170 4,150
Arterial
Raised
Median
8 2,120 7,070 7,490
6 1,560 5,270 5,610
5 1,280 4,370 4,670
4 1,000 3,470 3,730
3 720 2,555 2,795
2 440 1,640 1,860
TWLTL3 4 940 3,290 3,550
2 420 1,550 1,760
FirstCarbon Solutions M:\DriveT@VOLl\shared\31680016 - Fresno General Plan MEIRXFresnoGPMEIR_FINAL7.22.14X31680016Sec 05-14 Transportation MEIR7.22.14.doc 5.14-7 340
Section , Item B
City of Fresno
General Plan and Development Code Update
Transportation and Traffic Master Environmental Impact Report Peak Hour Levelof ServiceCapacityThreshold
FunctionalClass Median Lanes A B C D E
Undivided 4 770 2,740 2,980
2 340 1,270 1,480
Collector
TWLTL 4 940 3,290 3,550
2 420 1,550 1,760
Undivided 4 770 2,740 2,980
2 340 1,270 1,480
One-Way
Undivided 3 1,960 2,240 2,430 2,610
2 1,250 1,490 1,620 1,740
1 550 740 800 870
Rural State
Highway
Undivided 2 310 570 1,020 1,730 2,470
Rural Arterial
Divided 4 1,950 3,580 3,780
Undivided 2 570 1,230 1,310
Rural
Collector/Local
Undivided 2 700 930 1,000
Notes: 1 N/A - Not applicable for operational class
2 Aux - Auxiliary Lane
3 TWLTL- Two-way Left-turn Lane
- LOSis not achievable because of type of facility.

Source: Fehr & Peers 2012.

Exhibit 5.14-2 shows existing AM peak hour traffic volumes (two-way total) and LOS(SeeAppendix H-3 for detail) and Exhibit 5.14-3 shows existing PM peak hour traffic volumes (two-way total) and LOS(SeeAppendix H-4 for detail). Exhibit 5.14-4 illustrates the planned roadway number of lanes.

Most roadways operate at LOSD or better during the AM and PM peak hours, except for the following, which operate at LOSEand F:

City of Fresno
• Willow Avenue - Copper to Behymer Avenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Willow Avenue - Behymer Avenue to Shepherd Avenue (LOSF during the PM peak hour) • Golden State Boulevard - Shaw Avenue to Swift Avenue (LOSF during the PM peak hour) • Golden State Boulevard - Motel Drive to Ashlan Avenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • NeesAvenue - Jordan Avenue to PaulaAvenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Cornelia Avenue - Ashlan Avenue to Griffith Way (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Marks Avenue - Dakota Avenue to Weber Avenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Clinton Avenue - Valentine Avenue to Marks Avenue (LOSF during the PM peak hour)

5.14-8 FirstCarbon Solutions M:\DriveT@VOLl\shared\31680016 - Fresno General Plan MEIR\Fresno GPMEIR_FINAL7.22.14\31680016 Sec05-14 Transportation MEIR7.22.14.doc 341 Section , Item B
Appendix B – Traffic Counts
342
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-001 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 2 71 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 1 71 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 4 0 TEV 128 0 149 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.70 0.83
4 0 2 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 4 67 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 3 47 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 75

NORTHBOUND
N Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 73 HT (AM)
E Clayton Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Clayton Ave
5 0 5

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 71
N Fowler Ave & E Clayton Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
N Fowler Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 48 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
130
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
110
120
0 0
2 0
0 4
0680
4630
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
4 0
0 1
1700
2450
343
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-002 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 2 150 0 1 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 391 2 1 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 2
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
1 0 3 0 TEV 424 0 597 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.94 0.83
0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 1 191 5 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 266 1 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 151

NORTHBOUND
Golden State Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
7 0 1
Cars (AM) 393 HT (AM)
E Clayton Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Clayton Ave
2 0 1

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 196
Golden State Blvd & E Clayton Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Golden State Blvd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 270 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0260
0170
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
0 1
0 0
0200
0190
1 0
0 1
0 3
03652
11745
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
0 0
0 1
21300
02471
344
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-003 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 12 239 0 1 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 5 359 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 0 40 0 TEV 596 0 700 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.91 0.82
18 0 31 0
0 0 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 10 254 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 4 19 283 0 AM
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 294
S Golden State Blvd & E Jefferson Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Golden State Blvd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 304 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 391 HT (AM)
E Jefferson Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Jefferson Ave
31 0 15

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 261

NORTHBOUND
S Golden State Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
4 0
0 1
1230
3140
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
8 0
0 8
4280
3280
0 0
27 0
0 39
43360
72400
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
10 0
0 12
82110
162550
345
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-004 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 1 749 3 5 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 613 2 8 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0
0 1 0 4
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 TEV 1306 0 1394 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.97 0.96
1 0 0 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 3 766 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 1 3 537 1 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 751

NORTHBOUND
S Clovis Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
2 0 4
Cars (AM) 613 HT (AM)
E Jefferson Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Jefferson Ave
4 0 3

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(WB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 776
S Clovis Ave & E Jefferson Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Clovis Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 547 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0421
0550
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
1 0
0 0
0901
1430
1 0
0 0
0 1
05711
37110
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
3 0
0 0
0 1
16592
24941
346
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-005 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 720 30 2 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 572 39 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0
0 18 0 26
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 18 0 16
0 0 0 0 TEV 1325 0 1429 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.97 0.94
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 757 25 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 516 15 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 736

NORTHBOUND
S Clovis Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
64 0 45
Cars (AM) 590 HT (AM)
E Lincoln Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Lincoln Ave
0 0 0

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(WB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 775
S Clovis Ave & E Lincoln Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Clovis Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 544 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0411
0573
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 2
0 0
0881
0431
18 0
0 16
0 0
053138
070022
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
26 0
0 14
0 0
063229
047314
347
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-006 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 1 47 9 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 2 53 3 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0
0 5 0 5
1 29 0 32
0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8
0 0 0 0 TEV 194 0 233 0 0 0 0
26 0 50 1 PHF 0.90 0.90
17 0 14 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 6 66 2 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 12 31 6 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 72

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
55 0 41
Cars (AM) 70 HT (AM)
E Lincoln Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Lincoln Ave
45 0 37

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 71
S Fowler Ave & E Lincoln Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 36 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3
1 1
3 0
020
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
1 1
1 0
100
002
5 26
13 2
47 0
2513
6622
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
5 32
16 7
25 0
0479
12314
348
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-007 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 63 0 72
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 299 0 398 0 0 0 0
119 0 125 1 PHF 0.86 0.87
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 3 0 207 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 1 0 107 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 SB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
332 0 226
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
E Adams Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Adams Ave
73 0 66

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 0
SR 99 SB Ramps & E Adams Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 SB Ramps Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3
0 0
6 0
000
007
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 1
0 0
5 0
000
007
0 60
0 0
119
0 000
30200
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 71
0 0
114
0 000
10100
349
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-008 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
1 171 0 279
1 63 0 75
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 580 0 570 0 0 0 0
226 0 336 1 PHF 0.95 0.87
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB on ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
336 0 226
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
W Adams Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
W Adams Ave
75 0 63

CONTROL
No Control
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 171
SR 99 NB on ramps & W Adams Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB on ramps Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 279 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 3
0 0
13 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
12 1
0 0
12 0
000
000
163
60 0 0
323
0 000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
267
74 0 0
214
0 000
000
350
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-009 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 41 151 545 2 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 31 173 427 2 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 0 65 0 TEV 1084 0 1105 0 0 0 0
17 0 24 1 PHF 0.94 0.84
58 0 170 1
0 1 2 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 2 201 10 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 4 232 9 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 209

NORTHBOUND
S Clovis Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
461 0 571
Cars (AM) 343 HT (AM)
SR 99 SB Ramps

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
SR 99 SB Ramps
45 0 33

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 268
S Clovis Ave & SR 99 SB Ramps
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Clovis Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 259 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
10 0
0 4
41832
0142
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
6 0
4 2
13566
0182
0 0
160 0
24 61
27155395
21878
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
52 0
13 23
40116479
42147
351
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-010 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 21 72 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 14 196 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 33 0 42
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 172 0 305 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.93 0.67
37 0 62 1
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 0
SR 99 SB Off Ramp & E Clayton Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 SB Off Ramp Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 258 HT (AM)
E Clayton Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Clayton Ave
63 0 47

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(WB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 109

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 4
6 0
0 0
380
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
4 0
0 0
190
000
0 29
56 0
0 0
111880
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 42
33 0
0 0
20630
000
352
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-011 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 19 702 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 27 605 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 0 0
1 573 0 416
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 24 0 29
0 0 0 0 TEV 1423 0 1494 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.97
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 68 196 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 118 139 0 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 769
SR 99 NB Ramps & S Clovis Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB Ramps Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 555 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 630 HT (AM)
S Clovis Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
S Clovis Ave
137 0 95

CONTROL
1-Way Stop (WB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 731

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
53 0
0 5
0 0
4550
2170
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
37 0
0 0
0 0
21070
5150
520
0 0 19
0 0
235500
661790
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
379
0 0 29
0 0
175950
1131240
353
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-001 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 134 0 115 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 34 0 73 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
1 65 0 122
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 473 0 419 0 0 0 0
102 0 247 1 PHF 0.79 0.81
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
320 0 217
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
American Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
American Ave
256 0 99

CONTROL
1-Way Stop (SB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0
SR 99 SB Off Ramp & American Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 SB Off Ramp Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 0
0 7
0 0
12 0
108
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 22
0 0
18 0
9015
000
0 58
0 0
235
0 33065
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 100
0 0
84 0
1250100
000
354
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-002 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0

0.5 139 0 89

0.5 65 0 124
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
46 0 116 0 TEV 434 0 523 0 0 0 0
175 0 203 1 PHF 0.73 0.80
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB On Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
203 0 175
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
American Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
American Ave
124 0 65

CONTROL
No Control
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 255
SR 99 NB On Ramp & American Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB On Ramp Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 135 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 0
8 7
0 0
12 8
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
10 19
0 0
23 7
000
000
131
58 0 0
191
108
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
79 105
0 0
152
39 000
000
355
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-003 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 14 85 202 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 32 126 172 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM

0.5 0.5 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 116 0 98
0 0 0 0 0 215 0 217
0 0 0 0 TEV 1180 0 1074 0 0 0 0
201 0 135 2 PHF 0.91 0.94
27 0 32 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 13 0 233 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 10 0 326 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 329

NORTHBOUND
Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
540 0 729
Cars (AM) 373 HT (AM)
Merced St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Merced St
122 0 161

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0
Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Merced St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 2
0 2
0 4
4 0
146
009
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 6
1 16
2 0
0914
108
0 114
32 211
131
0 31122166
130224
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 92
26 201
199
0 1476188
90318
356
Section , Item B
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-004 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
0 188 0 210
1 306 0 307
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
161 0 152 0 TEV 1383 0 1172 0 0 0 0
568 0 386 1 PHF 0.92 0.94
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 24 4 112 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 12 0 125 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
498 0 693
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Merced St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Merced St
319 0 330

CONTROL
1-Way Stop (NB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 344
SR 99 NB Ramps & Merced St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB Ramps Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 371 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 2
7 5
0 0
8 11
000
119
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
7 21
0 0
20 4
000
2011
181
301
0 0
378
141
000
233103
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
203
286
0 0
548
157
000
100114
357
Section , Item B
Appendix C – Synchro Worksheets
358
Section , Item B

EXISTING CONDITIONS
359
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 115 134
Future Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 115 134
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 129 154 0 146 170
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 283 154
Stage 1 - - - - 154 -
Stage 2 - - - - 129 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 684 879
Stage 1 0 - - 0 848 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 870 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 684 879
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 684 -
Stage 1 - - - - 848 -
Stage 2 - - - - 870 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.8

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 684 879
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.213 0.193
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 11.7 10.1
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.8 0.7
+ + r
360
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 175 0 0 124 82 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 46 175 0 0 124 82 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 63 240 0 0 170 112 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 170 0 - - - 0 - 240
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - 0 0 - 0 0 796
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - - - - - - 796
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.6 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1332 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.047 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.1 - -
361
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 18 239 12 19 283
Future Vol, veh/h 20 18 239 12 19 283
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 22 20 263 13 21 311
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 479 132 0 0 276 0
Stage 1 263 - - - - -
Stage 2 216 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 426 779 - - 1228 -
Stage 1 650 - - - - -
Stage 2 692 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 412 779 - - 1228 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 412 - - - - -
Stage 1 650 - - - - -
Stage 2 668 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 12.4 0 0.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 1228 - 530 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.079 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8 - 12.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.1 - 0.3 - -
362
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 537 1 3 749 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 537 1 3 749 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 33 38 90 25 75 92 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 4 16 0 0 8 597 4 4 814 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1139 1441 409 1030 1441 301 818 0 0 601 0 0 Stage 1 824 824 - 615 615 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 315 617 - 415 826 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 115 130 493 186 130 692 634 - - 788 - - Stage 1 259 383 - 443 478 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 571 477 - 583 382 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 114 128 493 182 128 692 634 - - 788 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 114 128 - 182 128 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 256 381 - 437 472 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 564 471 - 575 380 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 25.3 26.7 0.1 0

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 634 - - 185 182 788 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.043 0.088 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.8 - - 25.3 26.7 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - D D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.3 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
363
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 516 15 30 720
Future Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 516 15 30 720
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 92 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 16 27 0 532 15 31 742
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1014 289 742 0 0 562 0
Stage 1 555 - - - - - -
Stage 2 459 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 218 705 482 - - 999 -
Stage 1 511 - - - - - -
Stage 2 575 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 203 695 482 - - 985 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 203 - - - - - -
Stage 1 504 - - - - - -
Stage 2 543 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.3 0 0.4

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 482 - - 361 985 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.12 0.031 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 16.3 8.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.1 -
fl ft* ft
364
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 31 60 9 47 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 31 60 9 47 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 29 19 9 36 6 13 34 67 10 52 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 188 200 53 191 167 68 53 0 0 101 0 0 Stage 1 73 73 - 94 94 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 115 127 - 97 73 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 770 694 1012 767 724 992 1546 - - 1485 - - Stage 1 934 832 - 910 815 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 887 789 - 907 832 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 728 683 1012 719 712 992 1546 - - 1485 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 728 683 - 719 712 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 926 826 - 902 808 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 836 782 - 853 826 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.9 10.2 0.9 1.2

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1546 - - 784 736 1485 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.061 0.068 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 0 - 9.9 10.2 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - -
365
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 150 2 0 266 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 150 2 0 266 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 160 2 0 283 1
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 302 444 80 365 446 142 284 0 0 162 0 0 Stage 1 160 160 - 284 284 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 142 284 - 81 162 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 625 505 961 462 503 747 1268 - - 1407 - - Stage 1 823 762 - 581 673 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 843 673 - 795 761 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 623 505 961 461 503 747 1268 - - 1407 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 623 505 - 461 503 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 823 762 - 581 673 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 841 673 - 794 761 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 12.1 10.8 0 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1407 - - 505 619 1268 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.002 0.005 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 12.1 10.8 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
366
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 4 3 47 71 2
Future Vol, veh/h 1 4 3 47 71 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 1 6 4 67 101 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 184 105 106 0 - 0
Stage 1 105 - - - - -
Stage 2 79 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 803 947 1313 - - -
Stage 1 917 - - - - -
Stage 2 942 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 797 945 1310 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 797 - - - - -
Stage 1 912 - - - - -
Stage 2 940 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9 0.5 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1310 - 911 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.008 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
367
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 416 118 139 0 0 702 19
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 416 118 139 0 0 702 19
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 31 0 438 124 146 0 0 739 20
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 764 - - 759 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 394 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 370 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 338 0 0 835 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 647 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 666 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 288 0 - 835 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 288 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 551 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 666 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 19 4.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 835 - 288 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - 0.106 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - 19 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - 0.4 - - -
368
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 72 21 42 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 72 21 42 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 40 77 23 45 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 77 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 77 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 924 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 943 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 924 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 924 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 943 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 9.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 924 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
369
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 545 151 41
Future Vol, veh/h 25 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 545 151 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 27 18 62 0 0 0 4 247 10 580 161 44
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1475 1598 103 205 0 0 247 0 0
Stage 1 1343 1343 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 132 255 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 111 85 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Stage 1 197 182 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 862 644 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 59 0 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 59 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 196 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 461 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 74.9 0.1 7.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1356 - - 59 907 1246 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.757 0.068 0.465 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - - 165.6 9.3 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 3.3 0.2 2.5 - -
f'h
370
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 119 0 0 72 1 107
Future Vol, veh/h 119 0 0 72 1 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 138 0 0 84 1 124
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 222 138
Stage 1 - - - - 138 -
Stage 2 - - - - 84 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 764 897
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 886 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 937 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 764 897
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 764 -
Stage 1 - - - - 886 -
Stage 2 - - - - 937 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 905 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.139 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - -
371
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 226 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 226 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 238 0 0 79 294 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 238
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 798
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 798
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
372
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 125 161 568 0 0 307 210
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 125 161 568 0 0 307 210
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 0 136 175 617 0 0 334 228
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1415 1529 617 562 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 967 967 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 448 562 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 138 117 476 999 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 342 331 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 607 508 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 114 0 476 999 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 114 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 282 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 607 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 21 2.1 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 999 - 372 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.175 - 0.4 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 - 21 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 1.9 - -
373
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 20.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 217 98 0 Future Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 217 98 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 222 93 15 11 0 358 0 221 30 238 108 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 23.8 22.5 18.4 18.1

HCM LOS C C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 228 336 301 217 98
LT Vol 0 10 202 217 0
Through Vol 201 0 85 0 98
RT Vol 27 326 14 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 251 369 331 238 108
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.52 0.677 0.668 0.546 0.233
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.474 6.605 7.269 8.238 7.776
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 481 546 496 439 462
Service Time 5.533 4.657 5.322 5.99 5.528
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.522 0.676 0.667 0.542 0.234
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.4 22.5 23.8 20.5 12.9
HCM Lane LOS C C C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.9 5.1 4.9 3.2 0.9
374
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 73 34
Future Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 73 34
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 305 80 0 90 42
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 385 80
Stage 1 - - - - 80 -
Stage 2 - - - - 305 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 601 977
Stage 1 0 - - 0 921 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 728 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 601 977
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 601 -
Stage 1 - - - - 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - 728 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 601 977
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.15 0.043
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 12 8.9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.5 0.1
+ + r
375
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 116 203 0 0 65 139 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 116 203 0 0 65 139 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 145 254 0 0 81 174 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 81 0 - - - 0 - 254
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - 0 0 - 0 0 782
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - - - - 782
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1486 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.098 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.3 - -
376
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 31 359 5 10 254
Future Vol, veh/h 40 31 359 5 10 254
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 49 38 438 6 12 310
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 635 219 0 0 444 0
Stage 1 438 - - - - -
Stage 2 197 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 409 752 - - 937 -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 814 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 397 752 - - 937 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 397 - - - - -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 790 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 13.7 0 0.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 937 - 500 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.173 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - 13.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.6 - -
377
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 766 0 2 613 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 766 0 2 613 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 25 38 93 25 25 96 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 8 824 0 8 639 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1083 1495 320 1176 1495 412 639 0 0 824 0 0 Stage 1 655 655 - 840 840 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 428 840 - 336 655 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 170 121 673 145 121 586 934 - - 556 - - Stage 1 419 458 - 324 377 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 572 377 - 649 458 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 166 118 673 143 118 586 934 - - 556 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 166 118 - 143 118 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 415 452 - 321 374 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 563 374 - 640 452 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 27.2 11.2 0.1 0.1

HCM LOS D B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 934 - - 166 586 556 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.024 0.007 0.014 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - - 27.2 11.2 11.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
378
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 757 25 39 572
Future Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 757 25 39 572
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 19 19 0 805 27 41 609
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1239 431 609 0 0 847 0
Stage 1 834 - - - - - -
Stage 2 405 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 155 570 586 - - 780 -
Stage 1 365 - - - - - -
Stage 2 616 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 142 562 586 - - 769 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 142 - - - - - -
Stage 1 360 - - - - - -
Stage 2 573 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 24.1 0 0.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 586 - - 227 769 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.169 0.054 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 24.1 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.6 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
379
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 66 2 3 53 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 66 2 3 53 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 56 16 3 32 6 7 73 2 3 59 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 173 155 60 190 155 74 61 0 0 75 0 0 Stage 1 66 66 - 88 88 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 107 89 - 102 67 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 788 735 1003 768 735 985 1536 - - 1518 - - Stage 1 942 838 - 917 820 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 896 819 - 902 837 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 753 730 1003 708 730 985 1536 - - 1518 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 753 730 - 708 730 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 937 836 - 912 816 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 851 815 - 827 835 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.1 10.1 0.6 0.4

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1536 - - 776 754 1518 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.092 0.055 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.1 10.1 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.2 0 - -
380
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 2 0 1 2 391 0 1 191 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 2 0 1 2 391 0 1 191 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 2 0 1 2 471 0 1 230 6
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 592 713 236 477 710 118 236 0 0 471 0 0 Stage 1 475 475 - 235 235 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 117 238 - 242 475 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 388 354 763 376 355 908 1321 - - 1080 - - Stage 1 537 553 - 627 707 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 872 705 - 620 553 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 386 353 763 372 354 908 1321 - - 1080 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 386 353 - 372 354 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 536 552 - 626 706 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 870 704 - 615 552 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 15.3 12.8 0 0

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1080 - - 353 463 1321 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.01 0.008 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 0 - 15.3 12.8 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
381
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 2 4 47 71 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 2 4 47 71 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 5 2 5 57 86 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 160 89 89 0 - 0
Stage 1 89 - - - - -
Stage 2 71 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 829 966 1500 - - -
Stage 1 932 - - - - -
Stage 2 949 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 823 964 1497 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 823 - - - - -
Stage 1 927 - - - - -
Stage 2 947 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.2 0.6 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1497 - 865 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.008 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 9.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
382
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 573 68 196 0 0 605 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 573 68 196 0 0 605 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 25 0 591 70 202 0 0 624 28
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 654 - - 652 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 342 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 312 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 361 0 0 924 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 640 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 665 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 334 0 - 924 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 334 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 591 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 665 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.6 2.4 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 924 - 334 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 - 0.074 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 - 16.6 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 0.2 - - -
383
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 62 196 14 33 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 62 196 14 33 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 67 67 67 67 67 67
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 93 293 21 49 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 293 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 293 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 677 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 735 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 677 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 677 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 735 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 10.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 677 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
384
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 29.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 427 173 31
Future Vol, veh/h 65 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 427 173 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 77 29 202 0 0 0 2 239 12 508 206 37
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1365 1484 122 243 0 0 239 0 0
Stage 1 1241 1241 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 124 243 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 134 123 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Stage 1 228 243 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 876 701 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 81 0 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 81 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 228 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 529 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 108 0.1 6.5

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1313 - - 81 894 1282 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 1.308 0.226 0.397 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - - 294.7 10.2 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 8.1 0.9 1.9 - -
f'h
385
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 123 0 0 63 3 207
Future Vol, veh/h 123 0 0 63 3 207
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 141 0 0 72 3 238
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 213 141
Stage 1 - - - - 141 -
Stage 2 - - - - 72 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 773 904
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 883 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 948 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 773 904
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 773 -
Stage 1 - - - - 883 -
Stage 2 - - - - 948 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 917 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.263 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.1 - -
386
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 386 0 0 72 197 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 386
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 660
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 660
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
387
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 112 152 386 0 0 306 188
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 112 152 386 0 0 306 188
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 4 119 162 411 0 0 326 200
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1161 1261 411 526 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 735 735 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 526 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 214 157 628 1016 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 471 400 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 655 500 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 180 0 628 1016 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 180 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 396 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 655 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.5 2.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1016 - 436 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 - 0.342 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 - 17.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 1.5 - -
388
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.2
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 215 116 0 Future Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 215 116 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 183 134 34 14 0 248 0 144 34 229 123 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.4 13.2 12.9 14.7

HCM LOS C B B B
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 167 246 330 215 116
LT Vol 0 13 172 215 0
Through Vol 135 0 126 0 116
RT Vol 32 233 32 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 178 262 351 229 123
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.328 0.426 0.606 0.465 0.233
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.644 5.856 6.219 7.312 6.801
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 540 615 579 492 528
Service Time 4.697 3.901 4.261 5.058 4.547
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.33 0.426 0.606 0.465 0.233
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.9 13.2 18.4 16.3 11.6
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 2.1 4 2.4 0.9
389
Section , Item B

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT
390
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 154 134
Future Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 154 134
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 129 154 0 195 170
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 283 154
Stage 1 - - - - 154 -
Stage 2 - - - - 129 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 684 879
Stage 1 0 - - 0 848 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 870 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 684 879
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 684 -
Stage 1 - - - - 848 -
Stage 2 - - - - 870 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 684 879
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.285 0.193
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 12.3 10.1
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1.2 0.7
+ + r
391
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 214 0 0 124 88 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 46 214 0 0 124 88 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 63 293 0 0 170 121 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 170 0 - - - 0 - 293
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - 0 0 - 0 0 744
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - - - - - - 744
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.4 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1332 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.047 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.1 - -
392
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 18 278 12 19 289
Future Vol, veh/h 20 18 278 12 19 289
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 22 20 305 13 21 318
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 524 153 0 0 318 0
Stage 1 305 - - - - -
Stage 2 219 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 396 753 - - 1183 -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 689 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 382 753 - - 1183 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 382 - - - - -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 665 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 12.9 0 0.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 1183 - 498 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.084 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 - 12.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.1 - 0.3 - -
393
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 539 1 3 762 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 539 1 3 762 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 33 38 90 25 75 92 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 4 16 0 0 8 599 4 4 828 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1154 1457 416 1039 1457 302 832 0 0 603 0 0 Stage 1 838 838 - 617 617 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 316 619 - 422 840 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 111 127 487 183 127 691 625 - - 786 - - Stage 1 254 377 - 442 477 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 570 476 - 577 377 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 109 125 487 179 125 691 625 - - 786 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 109 125 - 179 125 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 251 375 - 436 471 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 563 470 - 569 375 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 26.2 27.1 0.1 0

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 625 - - 178 179 786 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.045 0.089 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.8 - - 26.2 27.1 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - D D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.3 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
394
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 518 15 30 733
Future Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 518 15 30 733
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 92 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 16 27 0 534 15 31 756
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1023 290 756 0 0 564 0
Stage 1 557 - - - - - -
Stage 2 466 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 215 704 472 - - 997 -
Stage 1 510 - - - - - -
Stage 2 570 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 200 694 472 - - 983 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 200 - - - - - -
Stage 1 503 - - - - - -
Stage 2 538 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.4 0 0.3

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 472 - - 358 983 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.121 0.031 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 16.4 8.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.1 -
fl ft* ft
395
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 33 60 9 60 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 33 60 9 60 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 29 19 9 36 6 13 37 67 10 67 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 206 218 68 209 185 71 68 0 0 104 0 0 Stage 1 88 88 - 97 97 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 118 130 - 112 88 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 750 678 992 746 708 989 1527 - - 1481 - - Stage 1 917 820 - 907 813 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 884 787 - 891 820 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 708 667 992 699 697 989 1527 - - 1481 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 708 667 - 699 697 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 909 814 - 899 806 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 833 780 - 837 814 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10 10.4 0.8 1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1527 - - 766 721 1481 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.062 0.069 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10 10.4 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - -
396
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 9 0 29 18 150 2 0 266 53
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 9 0 29 18 150 2 0 266 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 10 0 31 19 160 2 0 283 56
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 340 537 80 430 511 170 339 0 0 162 0 0 Stage 1 198 198 - 311 311 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 142 339 - 119 200 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 587 447 961 410 462 713 1210 - - 1407 - - Stage 1 782 734 - 557 654 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 843 636 - 750 732 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 554 439 961 404 454 713 1210 - - 1407 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 554 439 - 404 454 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 769 722 - 548 654 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 807 636 - 736 720 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 13.2 11.4 0.9 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1407 - - 439 604 1210 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.002 0.067 0.016 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 13.2 11.4 8 0.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0.2 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
397
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 6 16 47 71 15
Future Vol, veh/h 3 6 16 47 71 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 4 9 23 67 101 21
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 231 114 124 0 - 0
Stage 1 114 - - - - -
Stage 2 117 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 755 936 1292 - - -
Stage 1 908 - - - - -
Stage 2 906 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 738 934 1290 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 738 - - - - -
Stage 1 889 - - - - -
Stage 2 904 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.3 2 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1290 - 858 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.015 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.1 - 0 - -
398
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 468 118 217 0 0 710 31
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 468 118 217 0 0 710 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 31 0 493 124 228 0 0 747 33
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 850 - - 780 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 476 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 374 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 298 0 0 820 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 588 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 663 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 253 0 - 820 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 253 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 499 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 663 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 21.2 3.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 820 - 253 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.151 - 0.121 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 - 21.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - 0.4 - - -
399
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 150 21 42 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 150 21 42 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 40 161 23 45 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 161 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 161 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 828 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 865 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 828 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 828 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 865 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 828 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
400
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 79.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 103 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 553 151 41
Future Vol, veh/h 103 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 553 151 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 110 18 62 0 0 0 4 247 10 588 161 44
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1491 1614 103 205 0 0 247 0 0
Stage 1 1359 1359 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 132 255 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 108 83 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Stage 1 193 178 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 862 644 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 57 0 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 57 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 192 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 455 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 490.6 0.1 7.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1356 - - 57 907 1246 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 2.24 0.068 0.472 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - -$ 723.2 9.3 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 12.6 0.2 2.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
401
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 132 0 0 74 1 107
Future Vol, veh/h 132 0 0 74 1 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 153 0 0 86 1 124
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 239 153
Stage 1 - - - - 153 -
Stage 2 - - - - 86 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 747 880
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 873 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 935 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 747 880
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 747 -
Stage 1 - - - - 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - 935 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 9.7

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 888 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.141 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - -
402
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 241 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 241 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 254 0 0 79 294 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 254
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 782
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 782
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
403
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 164 161 568 0 0 313 210
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 164 161 568 0 0 313 210
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 0 178 175 617 0 0 340 228
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1421 1535 617 568 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 967 967 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 454 568 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 137 116 476 994 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 342 331 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 603 505 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 113 0 476 994 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 113 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 282 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 603 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 22.8 2.1 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 994 - 390 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 - 0.491 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 - 22.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 2.6 - -
404
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 21.2
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 223 98 0 Future Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 223 98 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 222 93 15 11 0 358 0 221 30 245 108 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 24.1 22.8 18.6 18.6

HCM LOS C C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 228 336 301 223 98
LT Vol 0 10 202 223 0
Through Vol 201 0 85 0 98
RT Vol 27 326 14 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 251 369 331 245 108
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.523 0.681 0.671 0.562 0.233
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.511 6.643 7.307 8.253 7.791
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 479 543 493 436 461
Service Time 5.572 4.696 5.363 6.009 5.546
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.524 0.68 0.671 0.562 0.234
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.6 22.8 24.1 21.1 12.9
HCM Lane LOS C C C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3 5.2 4.9 3.4 0.9
405
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 79 34
Future Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 79 34
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 305 80 0 98 42
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 385 80
Stage 1 - - - - 80 -
Stage 2 - - - - 305 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 601 977
Stage 1 0 - - 0 921 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 728 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 601 977
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 601 -
Stage 1 - - - - 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - 728 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 601 977
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.162 0.043
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 12.1 8.9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.6 0.1
+ + r
406
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 116 209 0 0 65 172 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 116 209 0 0 65 172 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 145 261 0 0 81 215 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 81 0 - - - 0 - 261
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - 0 0 - 0 0 775
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - - - - 775
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1486 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.098 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.3 - -
407
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 31 365 5 10 287
Future Vol, veh/h 40 31 365 5 10 287
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 49 38 445 6 12 350
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 662 223 0 0 451 0
Stage 1 445 - - - - -
Stage 2 217 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 393 748 - - 931 -
Stage 1 610 - - - - -
Stage 2 795 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 381 748 - - 931 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 381 - - - - -
Stage 1 610 - - - - -
Stage 2 771 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 14 0 0.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 931 - 485 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.179 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - 14 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.6 - -
408
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 777 0 2 615 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 777 0 2 615 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 25 38 93 25 25 96 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 8 835 0 8 641 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1091 1508 321 1188 1508 418 641 0 0 835 0 0 Stage 1 657 657 - 851 851 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 434 851 - 337 657 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 168 119 672 142 119 581 933 - - 550 - - Stage 1 418 457 - 319 372 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 568 372 - 648 457 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 164 116 672 139 116 581 933 - - 550 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 164 116 - 139 116 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 414 450 - 316 369 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 559 369 - 639 450 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 27.5 11.2 0.1 0.1

HCM LOS D B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 933 - - 164 581 550 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.024 0.007 0.015 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - - 27.5 11.2 11.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
409
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 768 25 39 574
Future Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 768 25 39 574
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 19 19 0 817 27 41 611
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1252 437 611 0 0 859 0
Stage 1 846 - - - - - -
Stage 2 406 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 152 565 585 - - 772 -
Stage 1 359 - - - - - -
Stage 2 616 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 139 557 585 - - 761 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 139 - - - - - -
Stage 1 354 - - - - - -
Stage 2 573 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 24.6 0 0.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 585 - - 222 761 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.173 0.055 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 24.6 10 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.6 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
410
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 77 2 3 55 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 77 2 3 55 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 56 16 3 32 6 7 86 2 3 61 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 188 170 62 205 170 87 63 0 0 88 0 0 Stage 1 68 68 - 101 101 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 120 102 - 104 69 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 770 721 1000 751 721 969 1533 - - 1501 - - Stage 1 940 836 - 903 810 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 882 809 - 899 835 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 735 716 1000 692 716 969 1533 - - 1501 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 735 716 - 692 716 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 935 834 - 898 806 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 838 805 - 824 833 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.2 10.2 0.5 0.4

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1533 - - 763 740 1501 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.093 0.056 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.2 10.2 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.2 0 - -
411
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 47 0 157 30 391 0 1 191 13
Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 47 0 157 30 391 0 1 191 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 57 0 189 36 471 0 1 230 16
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 660 791 236 550 783 123 246 0 0 471 0 0 Stage 1 543 543 - 240 240 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 117 248 - 310 543 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 346 319 763 328 322 902 1310 - - 1080 - - Stage 1 489 515 - 622 703 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 872 697 - 558 515 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 265 307 763 316 310 902 1310 - - 1080 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 265 307 - 316 310 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 471 496 - 599 702 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 688 696 - 533 496 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.9 14.3 0.7 0

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1080 - - 307 632 1310 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.012 0.389 0.028 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 0 - 16.9 14.3 7.8 0.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 1.8 0.1 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
412
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 13 6 47 71 3
Future Vol, veh/h 15 13 6 47 71 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 18 16 7 57 86 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 165 90 92 0 - 0
Stage 1 90 - - - - -
Stage 2 75 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 823 965 1496 - - -
Stage 1 931 - - - - -
Stage 2 945 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 816 963 1493 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 816 - - - - -
Stage 1 924 - - - - -
Stage 2 943 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.3 0.8 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1493 - 878 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.038 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
413
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 581 68 208 0 0 650 94
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 581 68 208 0 0 650 94
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 25 0 599 70 214 0 0 670 97
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 689 - - 767 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 354 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 335 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 342 0 0 836 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 631 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 646 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 313 0 - 836 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 313 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 578 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 646 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.5 2.4 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 836 - 313 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 - 0.079 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 - 17.5 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 - 0.3 - - -
414
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 62 208 14 33 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 62 208 14 33 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 67 67 67 67 67 67
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 93 310 21 49 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 310 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 310 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 662 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 722 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 662 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 662 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 722 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 10.9

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 662 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.074 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
415
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 55.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 77 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 472 173 31
Future Vol, veh/h 77 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 472 173 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 92 29 202 0 0 0 2 239 12 562 206 37
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1473 1592 122 243 0 0 239 0 0
Stage 1 1349 1349 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 124 243 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 113 105 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Stage 1 199 216 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 876 701 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 63 0 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 63 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 199 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 492 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v218.1 0.1 7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1313 - - 63 894 1282 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 1.909 0.226 0.438 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - - $ 568 10.2 10 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 11.2 0.9 2.3 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
416
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 127 0 0 74 3 207
Future Vol, veh/h 127 0 0 74 3 207
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 146 0 0 85 3 238
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 231 146
Stage 1 - - - - 146 -
Stage 2 - - - - 85 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 755 898
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 879 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 936 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 755 898
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 755 -
Stage 1 - - - - 879 -
Stage 2 - - - - 936 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.4

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 911 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.265 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.1 - -
417
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 349 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 349 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 401 0 0 72 197 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 401
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 647
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 647
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
418
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 118 152 386 0 0 339 188
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 118 152 386 0 0 339 188
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 4 126 162 411 0 0 361 200
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1196 1296 411 561 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 735 735 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 461 561 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 204 149 628 986 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 471 400 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 631 482 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 171 0 628 986 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 171 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 394 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 631 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.9 2.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 986 - 433 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 - 0.359 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 - 17.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 1.6 - -
419
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 248 116 0 Future Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 248 116 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 183 134 34 14 0 248 0 144 34 264 123 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.3 13.7 13.2 16.3

HCM LOS C B B C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 167 246 330 248 116
LT Vol 0 13 172 248 0
Through Vol 135 0 126 0 116
RT Vol 32 233 32 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 178 262 351 264 123
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.335 0.437 0.62 0.54 0.235
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.782 6.012 6.362 7.364 6.853
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 529 597 565 491 523
Service Time 4.842 4.064 4.411 5.115 4.603
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.336 0.439 0.621 0.538 0.235
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.2 13.7 19.3 18.5 11.7
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 2.2 4.2 3.2 0.9
420
Section , Item B

HORIZON YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT
421
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 171 199
Future Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 171 199
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 165 197 0 186 216
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 362 197
Stage 1 - - - - 197 -
Stage 2 - - - - 165 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 616 832
Stage 1 0 - - 0 811 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 838 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 616 832
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 616 -
Stage 1 - - - - 811 -
Stage 2 - - - - 838 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 616 832
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.302 0.26
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 13.4 10.8
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1.3 1
+ + r
422
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 260 0 0 184 122 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 68 260 0 0 184 122 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 74 283 0 0 200 133 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 200 0 - - - 0 - 283
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - 0 0 - 0 0 754
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - - - - - 754
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.6 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1298 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.057 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.2 - -
423
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 811 28 41 961
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1392 406 0 0 839 0
Stage 1 811 - - - - -
Stage 2 581 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 93 495 - - 742 -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 424 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 86 495 - - 742 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 86 - - - - -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 394 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 66.6 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 742 - 138 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - 0.622 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - 66.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 3.3 - -
424
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 798 1 4 1113 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 798 1 4 1113 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 1 7 0 0 4 867 1 4 1210 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1661 2095 606 1489 2095 434 1211 0 0 868 0 0 Stage 1 1219 1219 - 876 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 442 876 - 613 1219 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 42 51 354 85 51 567 426 - - 603 - -
Stage 1 138 249 - 308 362 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 470 362 - 444 249 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 41 50 354 84 50 567 426 - - 603 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 41 50 - 84 50 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 137 247 - 305 359 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 466 359 - 440 247 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 55.8 51.4 0.1 0

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 426 - - 73 84 603 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.03 0.078 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.5 - - 55.8 51.4 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
425
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 791 23 46 1103
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1488 422 1103 0 0 829 0
Stage 1 818 - - - - - -
Stage 2 670 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 104 577 283 - - 792 -
Stage 1 370 - - - - - -
Stage 2 444 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 94 569 283 - - 781 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 94 - - - - - -
Stage 1 365 - - - - - -
Stage 2 408 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 32.4 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 283 - - 195 781 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.333 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 32.4 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1.4 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
426
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 46 89 13 70 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 46 89 13 70 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 42 27 13 52 8 20 50 97 14 76 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 274 292 77 278 244 99 77 0 0 147 0 0 Stage 1 105 105 - 139 139 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 169 187 - 139 105 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 676 617 981 672 656 954 1515 - - 1429 - - Stage 1 898 806 - 862 780 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 831 743 - 862 806 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 617 602 981 607 640 954 1515 - - 1429 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 617 602 - 607 640 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 885 798 - 849 768 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 757 732 - 786 798 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.6 11.2 0.9 1.2

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1515 - - 709 656 1429 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.098 0.111 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.6 11.2 7.5 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.4 0 - -
427
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 472 4 0 838 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 472 4 0 838 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 502 4 0 891 2
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 948 1395 251 1144 1398 447 893 0 0 506 0 0 Stage 1 502 502 - 892 892 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 446 893 - 252 506 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 214 139 746 107 138 446 749 - - 1048 - - Stage 1 517 538 - 221 356 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 559 356 - 610 536 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 212 139 746 106 138 446 749 - - 1048 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 212 139 - 106 138 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 517 538 - 221 356 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 554 356 - 609 536 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 31.1 22.2 0 0

HCM LOS D C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1048 - - 139 216 749 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.008 0.03 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 31.1 22.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
428
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 6 4 70 106 3
Future Vol, veh/h 1 6 4 70 106 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 1 7 4 76 115 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 207 119 120 0 - 0
Stage 1 119 - - - - -
Stage 2 88 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 779 930 1296 - - -
Stage 1 904 - - - - -
Stage 2 933 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 774 928 1294 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 774 - - - - -
Stage 1 899 - - - - -
Stage 2 931 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9 0.4 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1294 - 902 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.008 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
429
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 618 175 207 0 0 1043 28
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 618 175 207 0 0 1043 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 45 0 651 184 218 0 0 1098 29
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1135 - - 1127 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 586 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 549 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 194 0 0 604 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 517 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 540 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 135 0 - 604 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 135 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 359 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 540 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 44.6 6.2 0

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 604 - 135 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.305 - 0.335 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.6 - 44.6 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - E A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.3 - 1.4 - - -
430
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 55 107 31 62 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 55 107 31 62 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 59 115 33 67 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 115 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 115 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 879 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 907 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 879 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 879 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 907 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 9.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 879 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 -
HCM Lane LOS A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
431
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 170.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61
Future Vol, veh/h 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 39 27 91 0 0 0 6 367 14 862 238 65
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2191 2374 152 303 0 0 367 0 0
Stage 1 1995 1995 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 196 379 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 36 ~ 25 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Stage 1 85 80 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 800 561 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 8 0 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 8 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 85 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 184 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 1750.5 0.1 13.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1248 - - 8 842 1119 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 8.245 0.109 0.77 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 - -$ 4165.1 9.8 18.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 9.8 0.4 8 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
432
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 177 0 0 107 1 159
Future Vol, veh/h 177 0 0 107 1 159
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 192 0 0 116 1 173
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 308 192
Stage 1 - - - - 192 -
Stage 2 - - - - 116 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 682 837
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 838 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 906 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 682 837
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 682 -
Stage 1 - - - - 838 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.4

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 842 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.207 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.8 - -
433
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 354 0 0 117 437 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 354
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 688
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 688
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
434
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 19.9
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 20 0 202 260 917 0 0 496 339
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2103 2272 917 835 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1437 1437 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 666 835 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 50 40 319 790 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 200 198 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 479 381 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 34 0 319 790 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 34 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 134 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 479 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 186.3 2.6 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 790 - 183 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 - 1.212 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 - 186.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.4 - 11.9 - -
435
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 142.7
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Future Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 350 159 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 191 210.9 83.9 66.6

HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 339 499 447 322 146
LT Vol 0 15 300 322 0
Through Vol 299 0 126 0 146
RT Vol 40 484 21 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 368 542 486 350 159
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.986 1.369 1.312 0.995 0.431
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.759 10.159 10.976 11.929 11.456 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 313 363 335 308 317
Service Time 9.759 8.159 8.976 9.629 9.156
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.176 1.493 1.451 1.136 0.502
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 83.9 210.9 191 86.6 22.6
HCM Lane LOS F F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 10.4 23.9 20.6 10.5 2.1
436
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 108 51
Future Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 108 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 399 105 0 117 55
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 504 105
Stage 1 - - - - 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - 399 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 512 947
Stage 1 0 - - 0 897 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 659 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 512 947
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 512 -
Stage 1 - - - - 897 -
Stage 2 - - - - 659 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 512 947
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.229 0.059
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 14.1 9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.9 0.2
+ + r
437
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 302 0 0 97 207 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 172 302 0 0 97 207 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 187 328 0 0 105 225 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 105 0 - - - 0 - 328
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - 0 0 - 0 0 711
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - - - - - - 711
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1456 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.4 - -
438
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 20.4
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1218 12 22 862
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1711 609 0 0 1230 0
Stage 1 1218 - - - - -
Stage 2 493 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 81 412 - - 430 -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 576 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 76 412 - - 430 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 76 - - - - -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 537 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 289 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 430 - 115 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.389 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 - 289 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 11 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 439
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1138 0 3 911 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1138 0 3 911 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 93 92 92 96 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1224 0 3 949 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1575 2187 475 1713 2187 612 949 0 0 1224 0 0 Stage 1 955 955 - 1232 1232 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 620 1232 - 481 955 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 73 45 533 58 45 434 713 - - 360 - -
Stage 1 276 333 - 186 246 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 440 246 - 532 333 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 72 44 533 57 44 434 713 - - 360 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 72 44 - 57 44 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 274 330 - 185 245 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 436 245 - 528 330 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 55.8 13.3 0 0.1

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 713 - - 72 434 360 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.015 0.003 0.009 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - - 55.8 13.3 15.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
440
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1197 39 62 904
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1826 633 904 0 0 1251 0
Stage 1 1232 - - - - - -
Stage 2 594 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 62 420 380 - - 547 -
Stage 1 221 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 53 414 380 - - 539 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 53 - - - - - -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 90.7 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 380 - - 94 539 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.611 0.114 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 90.7 12.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 2.9 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
441
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 98 3 4 79 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 98 3 4 79 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 80 23 4 47 8 10 107 3 4 86 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 252 226 88 276 226 109 89 0 0 110 0 0 Stage 1 96 96 - 129 129 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 156 130 - 147 97 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 699 671 968 674 671 942 1500 - - 1474 - - Stage 1 908 814 - 872 787 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 844 787 - 853 813 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 651 664 968 592 664 942 1500 - - 1474 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 651 664 - 592 664 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 902 812 - 866 781 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 782 781 - 748 811 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.9 10.8 0.6 0.3

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1500 - - 714 684 1474 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.145 0.086 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.9 10.8 7.5 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.3 0 - -
442
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 1232 0 2 602 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 1232 0 2 602 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 1339 0 2 654 11
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1678 2016 670 1344 2011 333 665 0 0 1339 0 0 Stage 1 1347 1347 - 664 664 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 331 669 - 680 1347 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 57 397 73 58 660 913 - - 506 - -
Stage 1 158 216 - 319 454 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 653 452 - 311 216 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 60 56 397 67 57 660 913 - - 506 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 60 56 - 67 57 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 155 212 - 314 451 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 647 449 - 299 212 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 74.6 45.2 0.1 0

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 506 - - 56 96 913 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.078 0.068 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 0 - 74.6 45.2 9 0.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B A - F E A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
443
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 3 6 70 106 1
Future Vol, veh/h 6 3 6 70 106 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 7 3 7 76 115 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 212 118 118 0 - 0
Stage 1 118 - - - - -
Stage 2 94 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 774 931 1464 - - -
Stage 1 905 - - - - -
Stage 2 927 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 767 929 1461 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 767 - - - - -
Stage 1 899 - - - - -
Stage 2 925 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.5 0.6 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1461 - 814 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.012 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 9.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
444
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 291 0 0 899 40
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 291 0 0 899 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 37 0 877 104 300 0 0 927 41
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 972 - - 968 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 508 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 464 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 220 0 0 701 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 521 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 550 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 187 0 - 701 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 187 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 444 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 550 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 29 2.8 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 701 - 187 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - 0.198 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11 - 29 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - 0.7 - - -
445
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 62 291 21 49 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 62 291 21 49 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 67 316 23 53 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 316 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 316 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 657 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 717 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 657 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 657 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 717 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 11

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 657 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.081 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 -
446
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 197.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46
Future Vol, veh/h 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 105 39 275 0 0 0 3 325 16 689 279 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1851 2013 165 329 0 0 325 0 0
Stage 1 1682 1682 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 169 331 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 63 57 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Stage 1 131 148 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 832 641 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 26 0 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 26 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 131 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 350 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 818 0.1 8.2

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1220 - - 26 838 1189 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 5.56 0.328 0.58 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8 - -$ 2352.4 11.4 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 17.9 1.4 3.9 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
447
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 186 0 0 94 4 308
Future Vol, veh/h 186 0 0 94 4 308
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 202 0 0 102 4 335
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 304 202
Stage 1 - - - - 202 -
Stage 2 - - - - 102 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 686 836
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 830 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 920 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 686 836
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 686 -
Stage 1 - - - - 830 -
Stage 2 - - - - 920 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 847 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.4 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.9 - -
448
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 499 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 499 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 542 0 0 102 276 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 542
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 538
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 538
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
449
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.6
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 38 6 177 240 611 0 0 484 297
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1724 1872 611 781 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1091 1091 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 633 781 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 97 65 483 815 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 319 270 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 525 380 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 68 0 483 815 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 68 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 225 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 525 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 93.6 3.2 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 815 - 231 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.295 - 0.958 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3 - 93.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.2 - 8.5 - -
450
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 74.5
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Future Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 339 183 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 150.1 47.1 30.8 41.4

HCM LOS F E D E
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 249 365 491 319 172
LT Vol 0 19 256 319 0
Through Vol 201 0 187 0 172
RT Vol 48 346 48 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 265 388 522 339 183
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.668 0.866 1.232 0.875 0.446
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.927 8.702 8.489 9.976 9.453
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 366 419 428 367 384
Service Time 7.927 6.702 6.55 7.676 7.153
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.724 0.926 1.22 0.924 0.477
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 30.8 47.1 150.1 53.2 19.5
HCM Lane LOS D E F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.6 8.6 21.3 8.4 2.2
451
Section , Item B

HORIZON YEAR PLUS PROJECT
452
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.9
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 210 199
Future Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 210 199
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 165 197 0 228 216
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 362 197
Stage 1 - - - - 197 -
Stage 2 - - - - 165 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 616 832
Stage 1 0 - - 0 811 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 838 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 616 832
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 616 -
Stage 1 - - - - 811 -
Stage 2 - - - - 838 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 616 832
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.371 0.26
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 14.2 10.8
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1.7 1
+ + r
453
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 299 0 0 184 128 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 68 299 0 0 184 128 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 74 325 0 0 200 139 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 200 0 - - - 0 - 325
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - 0 0 - 0 0 714
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - - - - - 714
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.5 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1298 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.057 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.2 - -
454
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 853 28 41 967
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1437 427 0 0 881 0
Stage 1 853 - - - - -
Stage 2 584 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 86 478 - - 715 -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 423 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 80 478 - - 715 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 80 - - - - -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 392 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 76.1 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 715 - 129 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - 0.666 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.3 - 76.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 3.6 - -
455
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 800 1 4 1126 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 800 1 4 1126 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 1 7 0 0 4 870 1 4 1224 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1676 2112 613 1499 2112 436 1225 0 0 871 0 0 Stage 1 1233 1233 - 879 879 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 443 879 - 620 1233 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 41 50 350 84 50 565 420 - - 601 - -
Stage 1 135 245 - 307 361 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 469 361 - 440 245 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 41 49 350 83 49 565 420 - - 601 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 41 49 - 83 49 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 134 243 - 304 357 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 465 357 - 436 243 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 55.8 52 0.1 0

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 420 - - 73 83 601 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.03 0.079 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.7 - - 55.8 52 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
456
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 793 23 46 1116
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1496 423 1116 0 0 831 0
Stage 1 820 - - - - - -
Stage 2 676 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 103 577 277 - - 791 -
Stage 1 369 - - - - - -
Stage 2 441 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 569 277 - - 780 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 - - - - - -
Stage 1 364 - - - - - -
Stage 2 405 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 32.8 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 277 - - 193 780 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.337 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 32.8 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1.4 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
457
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 48 89 13 83 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 48 89 13 83 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 42 27 13 52 8 20 52 97 14 90 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 290 308 91 294 260 101 91 0 0 149 0 0 Stage 1 119 119 - 141 141 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 171 189 - 153 119 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 660 604 964 656 643 952 1498 - - 1426 - - Stage 1 883 795 - 860 778 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 829 742 - 847 795 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 601 589 964 591 627 952 1498 - - 1426 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 601 589 - 591 627 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 870 787 - 847 766 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 755 731 - 771 787 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.8 11.3 0.9 1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1498 - - 695 643 1426 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.1 0.113 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.8 11.3 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.4 0 - -
458
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 11 0 33 19 502 4 0 891 57
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 986 1488 251 1210 1464 474 948 0 0 506 0 0 Stage 1 540 540 - 920 920 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 446 948 - 290 544 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 201 122 746 94 126 426 714 - - 1048 - - Stage 1 491 517 - 211 346 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 559 335 - 575 515 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 180 117 746 91 121 426 714 - - 1048 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 180 117 - 91 121 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 473 498 - 203 346 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 516 335 - 553 496 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 36.1 24.9 0.6 0

HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1048 - - 117 224 714 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.009 0.195 0.027 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 36.1 24.9 10.2 0.2 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - E C B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0.7 0.1 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
459
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 8 17 70 106 16
Future Vol, veh/h 3 8 17 70 106 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 3 9 18 76 115 17
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 242 126 134 0 - 0
Stage 1 126 - - - - -
Stage 2 116 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 744 922 1280 - - -
Stage 1 897 - - - - -
Stage 2 906 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 730 920 1278 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 730 - - - - -
Stage 1 882 - - - - -
Stage 2 904 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.3 1.5 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1278 - 859 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - 0.014 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
460
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 670 175 284 0 0 1051 40
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 670 175 284 0 0 1051 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 45 0 705 184 299 0 0 1106 42
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1220 - - 1148 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 667 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 553 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 171 0 0 593 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 469 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 537 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 0 - 593 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 324 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 537 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 53.3 5.3 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 593 - 118 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.311 - 0.384 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 - 53.3 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.3 - 1.6 - - -
461
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 55 185 31 62 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 55 185 31 62 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 59 199 33 67 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 199 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 199 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 787 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 832 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 787 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 787 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 832 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 10

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 787 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 -
462
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 739.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61
Future Vol, veh/h 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 122 27 91 0 0 0 6 367 14 870 238 65
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2207 2390 152 303 0 0 367 0 0
Stage 1 2011 2011 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 196 379 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 35 ~ 25 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Stage 1 ~ 83 79 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 800 561 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 8 0 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 8 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 ~ 83 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 178 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 5475.3 0.1 13.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1248 - - 8 842 1119 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 18.617 0.109 0.778 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 - -$ 8832.7 9.8 18.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 20.4 0.4 8.3 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
463
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 0 0 109 1 159
Future Vol, veh/h 190 0 0 109 1 159
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 207 0 0 118 1 173
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 325 207
Stage 1 - - - - 207 -
Stage 2 - - - - 118 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 667 821
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 825 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 905 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 667 821
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 667 -
Stage 1 - - - - 825 -
Stage 2 - - - - 905 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 826 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.211 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.8 - -
464
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 351 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 351 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 369 0 0 117 437 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 369
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 674
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 674
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
465
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 29
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 20 0 245 260 917 0 0 502 339
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2109 2278 917 841 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1437 1437 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 672 841 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 50 40 319 786 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 200 198 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 475 379 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 33 0 319 786 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 33 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 134 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 475 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 239 2.6 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 786 - 194 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.331 - 1.361 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 - 239 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.4 - 15.3 - -
466
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 145
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Future Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 357 159 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 193.2 213.5 85 70.5

HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 339 499 447 328 146
LT Vol 0 15 300 328 0
Through Vol 299 0 126 0 146
RT Vol 40 484 21 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 368 542 486 357 159
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.989 1.375 1.317 1.014 0.432
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.83 10.215 11.036 11.96 11.486 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 310 358 335 307 316
Service Time 9.83 8.215 9.036 9.66 9.186
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.187 1.514 1.451 1.163 0.503
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 85 213.5 193.2 91.8 22.6
HCM Lane LOS F F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 10.4 24.1 20.7 11 2.1
467
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 114 51
Future Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 114 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 399 105 0 124 55
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 504 105
Stage 1 - - - - 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - 399 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 512 947
Stage 1 0 - - 0 897 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 659 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 512 947
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 512 -
Stage 1 - - - - 897 -
Stage 2 - - - - 659 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 512 947
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.242 0.059
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 14.3 9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.9 0.2
+ + r
468
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 308 0 0 97 240 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 172 308 0 0 97 240 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 187 335 0 0 105 261 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 105 0 - - - 0 - 335
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - 0 0 - 0 0 705
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - - - - - - 705
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1456 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.4 - -
469
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 21.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1225 12 22 898
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1736 613 0 0 1237 0
Stage 1 1225 - - - - -
Stage 2 511 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 78 409 - - 427 -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 564 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 73 409 - - 427 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 73 - - - - -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 526 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 311.8 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 427 - 111 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.439 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.9 -$ 311.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 11.4 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 470
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1149 0 3 913 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1149 0 3 913 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 93 92 92 96 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1235 0 3 951 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1583 2200 476 1725 2200 618 951 0 0 1235 0 0 Stage 1 957 957 - 1243 1243 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 626 1243 - 482 957 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 72 44 532 56 44 430 712 - - 355 - -
Stage 1 275 332 - 183 243 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 436 243 - 532 332 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 71 43 532 55 43 430 712 - - 355 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 71 43 - 55 43 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 273 329 - 182 242 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 432 242 - 528 329 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 56.5 13.4 0 0.1

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 712 - - 71 430 355 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.015 0.003 0.009 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - - 56.5 13.4 15.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
471
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1209 39 62 906
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1839 639 906 0 0 1263 0
Stage 1 1244 - - - - - -
Stage 2 595 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 416 379 - - 541 -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 52 410 379 - - 533 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 52 - - - - - -
Stage 1 215 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 94.3 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 379 - - 92 533 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.624 0.116 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 94.3 12.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 3 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
472
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 109 3 4 81 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 109 3 4 81 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 80 23 4 47 8 10 118 3 4 88 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 265 239 90 289 239 120 91 0 0 121 0 0 Stage 1 98 98 - 140 140 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 167 141 - 149 99 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 686 660 965 661 660 929 1498 - - 1460 - - Stage 1 906 812 - 861 779 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 833 778 - 851 811 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 638 653 965 580 653 929 1498 - - 1460 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 638 653 - 580 653 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 900 810 - 855 774 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 771 773 - 746 809 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 11 10.9 0.6 0.3

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1498 - - 703 673 1460 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.147 0.087 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 11 10.9 7.5 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.3 0 - -
473
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 22.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 53 0 172 35 1339 0 2 654 20
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1740 2087 670 1410 2077 337 674 0 0 1339 0 0 Stage 1 1409 1409 - 668 668 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 331 678 - 742 1409 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 55 52 397 64 52 656 906 - - 506 - -
Stage 1 144 202 - 317 452 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 653 447 - 282 202 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 36 44 397 ~ 52 44 656 906 - - 506 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 36 44 - ~ 52 44 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 122 171 - 269 449 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 479 444 - 233 171 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 95.6 216.5 0.9 0

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 506 - - 44 175 906 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.099 1.286 0.038 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 0 - 95.6 216.5 9.1 0.7 - HCM Lane LOS B A - F F A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 12.8 0.1 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
474
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 14 8 70 106 3
Future Vol, veh/h 17 14 8 70 106 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 18 15 9 76 115 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 217 119 120 0 - 0
Stage 1 119 - - - - -
Stage 2 98 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 769 930 1462 - - -
Stage 1 904 - - - - -
Stage 2 923 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 761 928 1459 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 761 - - - - -
Stage 1 897 - - - - -
Stage 2 921 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.5 0.8 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1459 - 828 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.041 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 9.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
475
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 303 0 0 944 107
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 303 0 0 944 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 37 0 877 104 312 0 0 973 110
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1007 - - 1083 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 520 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 487 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 208 0 0 634 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 513 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 535 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 174 0 - 634 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 174 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 429 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 535 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 31.2 2.9 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 634 - 174 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 - 0.213 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 - 31.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 0.8 - - -
476
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 92 303 21 49 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 92 303 21 49 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 100 329 23 53 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 329 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 329 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 645 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 707 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 645 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 645 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 707 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 11.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 645 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 -
477
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 303.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46 Future Vol, veh/h 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 118 39 275 0 0 0 3 325 16 738 279 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1949 2111 165 329 0 0 325 0 0
Stage 1 1780 1780 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 169 331 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 54 50 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Stage 1 ~ 115 132 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 832 641 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 20 0 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 20 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 ~ 115 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 315 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 1273.3 0.1 8.9

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1220 - - 20 838 1189 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 7.88 0.328 0.621 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8 - -$ 3475.2 11.4 12.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 20.1 1.4 4.5 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
478
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 188 0 0 105 4 308
Future Vol, veh/h 188 0 0 105 4 308
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 204 0 0 114 4 335
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 318 204
Stage 1 - - - - 204 -
Stage 2 - - - - 114 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 673 834
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 828 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 908 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 673 834
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 673 -
Stage 1 - - - - 828 -
Stage 2 - - - - 908 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 845 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.401 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 2 - -
479
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 512 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 512 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 557 0 0 102 276 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 557
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 528
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 528
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
480
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14.4
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 38 6 183 240 611 0 0 519 297
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1759 1907 611 816 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1091 1091 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 668 816 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 92 62 483 790 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 319 270 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 506 366 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 64 0 483 790 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 64 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 222 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 506 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 107.6 3.3 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 790 - 226 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.304 - 1.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 - 107.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.3 - 9.3 - -
481
Section , Item B
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 83.3
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Future Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 376 183 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 162.2 51 32.4 56

HCM LOS F F D F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 249 365 491 353 172
LT Vol 0 19 256 353 0
Through Vol 201 0 187 0 172
RT Vol 48 346 48 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 265 388 522 376 183
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.681 0.884 1.261 0.974 0.449
Departure Headway (Hd) 10.206 8.96 8.69 10.093 9.571
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 358 408 418 361 379
Service Time 8.206 6.96 6.756 7.793 7.271
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.74 0.951 1.249 1.042 0.483
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 32.4 51 162.2 73.7 19.8
HCM Lane LOS D F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.8 9 22.2 10.8 2.2
482
Section , Item B

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT RESULTS
483
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 811 28 41 961
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1392 406 0 0 839 0
Stage 1 811 - - - - -
Stage 2 581 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 93 495 - - 742 -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 424 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 86 495 - - 742 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 86 - - - - -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 394 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 53.9 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 742 - 86 495 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - 0.543 0.079 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - 88.3 12.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 2.4 0.3 - -
484
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 11.8
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1218 12 22 862
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1711 609 0 0 1230 0
Stage 1 1218 - - - - -
Stage 2 493 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 81 412 - - 430 -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 576 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 76 412 - - 430 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 76 - - - - -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 537 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v166.7 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 430 - 76 412 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.23 0.161 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 - 274.1 15.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 7.1 0.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 485
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 853 28 41 967
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1437 427 0 0 881 0
Stage 1 853 - - - - -
Stage 2 584 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 86 478 - - 715 -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 423 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 80 478 - - 715 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 80 - - - - -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 392 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 60.4 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 715 - 80 478 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - 0.584 0.082 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.3 - 99.9 13.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 2.6 0.3 - -
486
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1225 12 22 898
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1736 613 0 0 1237 0
Stage 1 1225 - - - - -
Stage 2 511 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 78 409 - - 427 -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 564 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 73 409 - - 427 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 73 - - - - -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 526 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v180.4 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 427 - 73 409 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.281 0.162 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.9 - 297.4 15.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 7.3 0.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 487
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 791 23 46 1103
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1488 422 1103 0 0 829 0
Stage 1 818 - - - - - -
Stage 2 670 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 104 577 283 - - 792 -
Stage 1 370 - - - - - -
Stage 2 444 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 94 569 283 - - 781 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 94 - - - - - -
Stage 1 365 - - - - - -
Stage 2 408 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 28.8 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 283 - - 94 569 781 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.263 0.071 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 56.5 11.8 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1 0.2 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
488
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1197 39 62 904
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1826 633 904 0 0 1251 0
Stage 1 1232 - - - - - -
Stage 2 594 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 62 420 380 - - 547 -
Stage 1 221 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 53 414 380 - - 539 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 53 - - - - - -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 74.5 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 380 - - 53 414 539 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.542 0.069 0.114 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 134.7 14.3 12.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 2.1 0.2 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
489
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 793 23 46 1116
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1496 423 1116 0 0 831 0
Stage 1 820 - - - - - -
Stage 2 676 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 103 577 277 - - 791 -
Stage 1 369 - - - - - -
Stage 2 441 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 569 277 - - 780 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 - - - - - -
Stage 1 364 - - - - - -
Stage 2 405 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 29.1 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 277 - - 93 569 780 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.266 0.071 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 57.2 11.8 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1 0.2 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
490
Section , Item B
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1209 39 62 906
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1839 639 906 0 0 1263 0
Stage 1 1244 - - - - - -
Stage 2 595 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 416 379 - - 541 -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 52 410 379 - - 533 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 52 - - - - - -
Stage 1 215 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 76.7 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 379 - - 52 410 533 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.552 0.07 0.116 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 138.9 14.4 12.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 2.1 0.2 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
491
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1159 1856 1159 1856 1707 1856 1856 1796 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1 0 11 0 33 19 502 4 0 891 57
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Cap, veh/h 0 101 0 398 0 54 191 1667 853 0 1766 113
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.54 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1856 0 1392 0 982 35 3074 1572 0 3347 208 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1 0 11 0 33 276 245 4 0 467 481
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1392 0 982 1633 1476 1572 0 1706 1759 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 0.12
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 101 0 398 0 54 1058 800 853 0 925 954 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.62 0.26 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1870 0 1738 0 990 4147 3868 4121 0 4472 4609 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 10.3 2.8 2.8 2.3 0.0 3.2 3.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 21.3 2.9 3.0 2.3 0.0 3.6 3.6 LnGrp LOS B B C A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1 44 525 948
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.0 18.5 3.0 3.6
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 5.7 16.6 5.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 58.5 22.5 58.5 22.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 2.0 4.0 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.3 0.0 3.1 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 3.8
HCM 6th LOS A
4+ f 4T>
492
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1159 1856 1856 1856 1811 1856 1856 1767 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 4 0 53 0 172 35 1339 0 2 654 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Cap, veh/h 0 290 0 399 0 246 118 2022 967 93 1999 61
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1856 0 1385 0 1572 36 3289 1572 1 3251 99 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 4 0 53 0 172 730 644 0 355 0 321 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1385 0 1572 1759 1566 1572 1762 0 1590 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 4.1 10.2 10.6 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.01 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 290 0 399 0 246 1178 963 967 1175 0 977 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.70 0.62 0.67 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 921 0 876 0 780 2786 2450 2460 2820 0 2488 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 14.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 15.7 4.9 5.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.6 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 14.0 0.0 14.8 0.0 19.3 5.4 5.8 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.8 LnGrp LOS B B B A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 4 225 1374 676
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.0 18.2 5.6 3.8
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.7 10.6 28.7 10.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 61.5 19.5 61.5 19.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 2.1 12.6 6.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.0 0.0 11.6 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 6.3
HCM 6th LOS A
4+ f 4T>
493
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1544 1752 1856 1781 1574 1722 1559 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 35 0 6 367 0 862 238 65
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 24 10 3 8 22 12 23 3
Cap, veh/h 115 104 14 670 1192 1305 349
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.37 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1544 1485 1767 3474 0 3182 2312 618 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 35 0 6 367 0 862 151 152
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1544 1485 1767 1692 0 1591 1481 1448 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.0 8.7 1.8 1.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.0 8.7 1.8 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.43
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 115 104 14 670 1192 836 817
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.33 0.42 0.55 0.72 0.18 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 837 762 259 1850 3181 2073 2026
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.6 16.7 0.0 18.5 13.5 0.0 10.1 4.0 4.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 1.9 0.0 18.4 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.0 18.5 0.0 37.0 14.2 0.0 10.9 4.1 4.1 LnGrp LOS B B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 68 373 1165
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 14.6 9.1
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 11.9 7.0 4.8 25.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.5 20.5 18.5 5.5 52.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 5.7 2.8 2.1 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.3 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 10.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
494
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1856 1811 1856 1796 1604 1781 1841 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 72 85 0 3 325 0 689 279 50
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 3 6 3 7 20 8 4 13
Cap, veh/h 193 208 7 647 1024 1474 261
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.31 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1856 1535 1767 3503 0 3291 2970 525 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 85 0 3 325 0 689 163 166
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1856 1535 1767 1706 0 1646 1749 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 6.4 1.8 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 6.4 1.8 1.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 193 208 7 647 1024 868 867
V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.41 0.41 0.50 0.67 0.19 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1064 1145 279 2203 3069 2484 2480 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.3 14.4 0.0 17.3 12.6 0.0 10.5 4.9 4.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 1.3 0.0 33.5 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.5 15.7 0.0 50.8 13.3 0.0 11.2 5.0 5.0 LnGrp LOS B B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 157 328 1018
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.6 13.6 9.2
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.3 11.1 8.4 4.6 21.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.5 22.5 21.5 5.5 49.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 5.0 3.5 2.1 3.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.5 1.6 0.5 0.0 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 10.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
495
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1544 1752 1856 1781 1574 1722 1559 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 141 0 0 6 367 0 870 238 65
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 24 10 3 8 22 12 23 3
Cap, veh/h 336 0 14 654 1179 1284 343
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.37 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 3393 0 1485 1767 3474 0 3182 2312 618
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 141 0 0 6 367 0 870 151 152
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 0 1485 1767 1692 0 1591 1481 1448 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.9 0.0 9.5 2.0 2.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.9 0.0 9.5 2.0 2.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.43
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 336 0 14 654 1179 823 804
V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.56 0.74 0.18 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1569 0 243 1819 2903 1944 1900
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.9 0.0 0.0 19.7 14.6 0.0 10.9 4.4 4.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.8 0.0 0.0 38.3 15.4 0.0 11.8 4.5 4.5 LnGrp LOS B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 141 373 1173
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 15.7 9.9
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.3 12.2 8.5 4.8 26.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.5 21.5 18.5 5.5 52.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 5.9 3.6 2.1 4.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 1.8 0.4 0.0 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
496
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1856 1811 1856 1796 1604 1781 1841 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 79 94 0 3 325 0 738 279 50
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 3 6 3 7 20 8 4 13
Cap, veh/h 197 212 7 633 1072 1505 266
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.33 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1856 1535 1767 3503 0 3291 2970 525 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 79 94 0 3 325 0 738 163 166
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1856 1535 1767 1706 0 1646 1749 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 1.7 0.0 0.1 3.1 0.0 7.0 1.8 1.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 1.7 0.0 0.1 3.1 0.0 7.0 1.8 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 197 212 7 633 1072 886 885
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.44 0.41 0.51 0.69 0.18 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 1107 270 2037 3061 2403 2399 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.8 14.9 0.0 17.9 13.2 0.0 10.6 4.8 4.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 1.5 0.0 33.5 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.1 16.3 0.0 51.4 13.9 0.0 11.4 4.9 4.9 LnGrp LOS B B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 173 328 1067
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.2 14.2 9.4
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 11.2 8.6 4.6 22.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.5 21.5 21.5 5.5 49.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 5.1 3.7 2.1 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.7 1.6 0.6 0.0 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
497
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1752 1856 1752 1856 1856 0 1856 1841 1811 1767 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 350 159 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 0 3 4 6 9 0
Cap, veh/h 356 637 107 292 0 640 0 355 47 381 853 0
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.44 0.44 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1711 1462 245 1217 0 1572 0 1605 212 1725 1767 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 326 0 160 16 0 526 0 0 368 350 159 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1711 0 1708 1217 0 1572 0 0 1817 1725 1767 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.5 0.0 6.4 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 21.8 21.8 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.5 0.0 6.4 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 21.8 21.8 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 0 743 292 0 640 0 0 402 381 853 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.19 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 412 0 799 292 0 640 0 0 438 447 955 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.6 0.0 19.4 36.9 0.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 41.9 41.9 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 22.9 21.9 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.9 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 12.0 11.5 2.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 65.6 0.0 19.5 37.0 0.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 64.8 63.8 16.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E B D D E E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 486 542 368 509
Approach Delay, s/veh 50.4 37.4 64.8 49.0
Approach LOS D D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 25.0 28.8 28.8 52.4 57.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 20.5 28.5 26.5 51.5 59.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.5 22.5 23.8 23.8 8.4 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 49.1
HCM 6th LOS D
4 i*
498
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1841 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 339 183 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 319 629 161 318 0 666 0 257 61 388 837 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.44 0.44 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1425 365 1121 0 1560 0 1448 345 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 272 0 250 20 0 368 0 0 265 339 183 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1790 1121 0 1560 0 0 1793 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.5 0.0 7.6 1.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 11.9 15.5 5.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.5 0.0 7.6 1.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 11.9 15.5 5.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.19 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 319 0 790 318 0 666 0 0 319 388 837 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.87 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 560 0 1102 361 0 725 0 0 504 665 1319 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.2 0.0 15.2 26.8 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 31.5 14.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 6.6 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 5.5 7.1 2.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 39.7 0.0 15.4 26.8 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.0 39.8 38.1 14.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B C B D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 522 388 265 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 19.2 39.8 29.7
Approach LOS C B D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.6 21.8 22.9 19.4 41.4 42.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 20.5 31.5 23.5 51.5 59.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.5 16.8 17.5 13.9 9.6 7.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 28.4
HCM 6th LOS C
4 i*
499
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1752 1856 1752 1856 1856 0 1856 1841 1811 1767 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 357 159 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 0 3 4 6 9 0
Cap, veh/h 356 633 106 290 0 644 0 354 47 387 858 0
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.43 0.43 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.49 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1711 1462 245 1217 0 1572 0 1605 212 1725 1767 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 326 0 160 16 0 526 0 0 368 357 159 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1711 0 1708 1217 0 1572 0 0 1817 1725 1767 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.7 0.0 6.5 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 22.0 22.5 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.7 0.0 6.5 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 22.0 22.5 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 0 740 290 0 644 0 0 401 387 858 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.22 0.06 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.19 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 409 0 793 290 0 644 0 0 434 443 947 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.0 0.0 19.7 37.4 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 42.3 42.1 16.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 23.4 23.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.0 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 12.2 11.9 2.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 66.4 0.0 19.8 37.4 0.0 37.2 0.0 0.0 65.7 65.1 16.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS E B D D E E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 486 542 368 516
Approach Delay, s/veh 51.0 37.2 65.7 50.1
Approach LOS D D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.6 25.0 29.4 29.0 52.6 58.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 20.5 28.5 26.5 51.5 59.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.7 22.5 24.5 24.0 8.5 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 49.7
HCM 6th LOS D
4 i*
500
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1841 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 376 183 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 316 614 157 308 0 688 0 254 60 423 865 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.43 0.43 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.24 0.47 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1425 365 1121 0 1560 0 1448 345 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 272 0 250 20 0 368 0 0 265 376 183 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1790 1121 0 1560 0 0 1793 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.1 0.0 8.1 1.3 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 18.0 5.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.1 0.0 8.1 1.3 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 18.0 5.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.19 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 316 0 772 308 0 688 0 0 314 423 865 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.32 0.07 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.89 0.21 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 514 0 1031 344 0 738 0 0 460 675 1280 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.0 0.0 16.5 28.5 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 35.0 32.2 13.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 9.1 8.8 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 0.0 3.2 0.3 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 6.0 8.5 2.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.2 0.0 16.7 28.6 0.0 18.6 0.0 0.0 44.1 41.0 14.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B C B D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 522 388 265 559
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.5 19.1 44.1 32.1
Approach LOS C B D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 22.1 25.5 19.9 42.3 45.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 20.5 33.5 22.5 50.5 60.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.1 17.1 20.0 14.5 10.1 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.8 1.6 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 30.6
HCM 6th LOS C
4 i*
501
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1604 1856 1752 1841 1856 0 0 1796 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 0 202 260 917 0 0 496 339
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 20 3 10 4 3 0 0 7 3
Cap, veh/h 27 0 273 328 1181 0 0 651 570
Arrive On Green 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 143 0 1445 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 222 0 0 260 917 0 0 496 339
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1588 0 0 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.3 18.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 9.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.3 18.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 9.0 Prop In Lane 0.09 0.91 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 0 0 328 1181 0 0 651 570
V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 600 0 0 730 2211 0 0 1236 1082
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.7 0.0 0.0 20.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 14.5 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.6 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.9 3.8 0.0 0.0 4.3 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.3 0.0 0.0 24.4 7.9 0.0 0.0 16.4 14.4 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 1177 835
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.3 11.5 15.5
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 37.4 14.1 23.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 61.5 21.5 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 20.3 9.3 14.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 8.3 0.6 4.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.2
HCM 6th LOS B
502
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1604 1781 1796 1856 0 0 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 6 177 240 611 0 0 484 297
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 20 8 7 3 0 0 3 4
Cap, veh/h 49 8 230 305 1141 0 0 645 542
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 239 38 1114 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 221 0 0 240 611 0 0 484 297
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1391 0 0 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 0.0 6.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 11.6 7.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.6 0.0 0.0 6.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 11.6 7.7 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.80 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 288 0 0 305 1141 0 0 645 542
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 524 0 0 746 2279 0 0 1305 1097
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.9 0.0 0.0 19.8 5.6 0.0 0.0 14.5 13.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.2 0.0 0.0 24.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 14.1 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 221 851 781
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.2 11.2 15.5
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.9 35.5 13.5 22.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 62.0 22.0 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 11.5 8.8 13.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.4 0.5 3.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.4
HCM 6th LOS B
503
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1604 1856 1752 1841 1856 0 0 1796 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 0 245 260 917 0 0 502 339
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 20 3 10 4 3 0 0 7 3
Cap, veh/h 26 0 314 323 1158 0 0 645 565
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.18 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 120 0 1466 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 265 0 0 260 917 0 0 502 339
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1586 0 0 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 20.4 0.0 0.0 13.8 9.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 20.4 0.0 0.0 13.8 9.8 Prop In Lane 0.08 0.92 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 0 0 323 1158 0 0 645 565
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 585 0 0 646 2019 0 0 1147 1004
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.6 0.0 0.0 21.7 7.8 0.0 0.0 15.9 14.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.9 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 0.0 26.4 9.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 15.6 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 265 1177 841
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 12.9 17.0
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.4 39.2 14.7 24.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 60.5 20.5 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.8 22.4 9.9 15.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 8.2 0.5 4.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.7
HCM 6th LOS B
504
Section , Item B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1604 1781 1796 1856 0 0 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 6 183 240 611 0 0 519 297
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 20 8 7 3 0 0 3 4
Cap, veh/h 49 8 234 301 1156 0 0 673 566
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 233 37 1121 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 227 0 0 240 611 0 0 519 297
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1390 0 0 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.3 0.0 0.0 7.2 9.9 0.0 0.0 13.2 8.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.3 0.0 0.0 7.2 9.9 0.0 0.0 13.2 8.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.81 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 290 0 0 301 1156 0 0 673 566
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 507 0 0 656 2134 0 0 1266 1065
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 5.7 0.0 0.0 15.1 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.6 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.8 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 0.0 25.9 6.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 14.2 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 227 851 816
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 11.6 16.0
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 37.8 13.9 23.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 61.5 20.5 36.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 11.9 9.2 15.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.3 0.5 4.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B
505
Section , Item B

INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Site: 101 [HY Plus Project AM (Site Folder: General)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.4.221 Clovis Ave-SR 99 SB Ramps
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Intersection Performance - Hourly Values
Performance Measure Vehicles: All MCs Persons
Travel Speed (Average) km/h 49.7 49.7 km/h
Travel Distance (Total) veh-km/h 1950.2 2340.2 pers-km/h Travel Time (Total) veh-h/h 39.2 47.1 pers-h/h
Desired Speed km/h 65.0
Speed Efficiency 0.76
Travel Time Index 7.39
Congestion Coefficient 1.31
Demand Flows (Total) veh/h 1840 2208 pers/h
Arrival Flows (Total) veh/h 1840
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) % 3.0
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Arrivals) % 3.0
Degree of Saturation 0.648
Practical Spare Capacity % 31.1
Effective Intersection Capacity veh/h 2839
Control Delay (Total) veh-h/h 4.41 5.30 pers-h/h
Control Delay (Average) sec 8.6 8.6 sec
Control Delay (Worst Lane by MC) sec 14.7
Control Delay (Worst Movement by MC) sec 37.9 37.9 sec
Geometric Delay (Average) sec 0.0
Stop-Line Delay (Average) sec 8.6
Idling Time (Average) sec 6.5
Intersection Level of Service (LOS) LOS A
95% Back of Queue - Veh (Worst Lane) veh 6.4
95% Back of Queue - Dist (Worst Lane) m 49.7
Ave. Que Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) 0.04
Effective Stops (Total) veh/h 514 617 pers/h
Effective Stop Rate 0.28 0.28
Proportion Queued 0.31 0.31
Performance Index 50.5 50.5
Cost (Total) $/h 986.42 986.42 $/h
Fuel Consumption (Total) L/h 192.4
Carbon Dioxide (Total) kg/h 455.4
Hydrocarbons (Total) kg/h 0.040
Carbon Monoxide (Total) kg/h 0.56
NOx (Total) kg/h 0.699
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements.

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand effects.

In Network analysis, Arrival Flows will be reduced if Upstream Capacity Constraint exists.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Site: 101 [HY Plus Project PM (Site Folder: General)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.4.221 Clovis Ave-SR 99 SB Ramps
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Intersection Performance - Hourly Values
Performance Measure Vehicles: All MCs Persons
Travel Speed (Average) km/h 49.9 49.9 km/h
Travel Distance (Total) veh-km/h 1945.7 2334.8 pers-km/h Travel Time (Total) veh-h/h 39.0 46.8 pers-h/h
Desired Speed km/h 65.0
Speed Efficiency 0.77
Travel Time Index 7.42
Congestion Coefficient 1.30
Demand Flows (Total) veh/h 1845 2213 pers/h
Arrival Flows (Total) veh/h 1845
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) % 3.0
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Arrivals) % 3.0
Degree of Saturation 0.588
Practical Spare Capacity % 44.6
Effective Intersection Capacity veh/h 3138
Control Delay (Total) veh-h/h 4.53 5.43 pers-h/h
Control Delay (Average) sec 8.8 8.8 sec
Control Delay (Worst Lane by MC) sec 18.6
Control Delay (Worst Movement by MC) sec 44.6 44.6 sec
Geometric Delay (Average) sec 0.0
Stop-Line Delay (Average) sec 8.8
Idling Time (Average) sec 6.4
Intersection Level of Service (LOS) LOS A
95% Back of Queue - Veh (Worst Lane) veh 4.0
95% Back of Queue - Dist (Worst Lane) m 31.4
Ave. Que Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) 0.03
Effective Stops (Total) veh/h 614 736 pers/h
Effective Stop Rate 0.33 0.33
Proportion Queued 0.33 0.33
Performance Index 51.7 51.7
Cost (Total) $/h 979.77 979.77 $/h
Fuel Consumption (Total) L/h 190.9
Carbon Dioxide (Total) kg/h 451.9
Hydrocarbons (Total) kg/h 0.040
Carbon Monoxide (Total) kg/h 0.56
NOx (Total) kg/h 0.695
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements.

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand effects.

In Network analysis, Arrival Flows will be reduced if Upstream Capacity Constraint exists.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

Site Model Variability Index (Average value of largest changes in Lane Degrees of Saturation from the third to the last Main (TimingCapacity) Iterations): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 3 (Maximum: 10)
Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance - Annual Values
Performance Measure Vehicles: All MCs Persons
Demand Flows (Total) veh/y 885,391 1,062,470 pers/y
Delay (Total) veh-h/y 2,173 2,608 pers-h/y
508
Section , Item B
Effective Stops (Total) veh/y 294,596 353,515 pers/y
Travel Distance (Total) veh-km/y 933,921 1,120,705 pers-km/y Travel Time (Total) veh-h/y 18,718 22,461 pers-h/y
Cost (Total) $/y 470,292 470,292 $/y
Fuel Consumption (Total) L/y 91,624
Carbon Dioxide (Total) kg/y 216,927
Hydrocarbons (Total) kg/y 19
Carbon Monoxide (Total) kg/y 268
NOx (Total) kg/y 334
1 Hours per Year: 480 (Site)
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2023 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: VRPA TECHNOLOGIES | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 7:57:00 PM Project: C:\Users\jellard\Desktop\Shared Items on VRPA1\Project_NP\Clayton and Goldenstate Blvd Property Rezone\SIDRA\HY Plus Project.sip9
509
Section , Item B
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 34 91 6 381 862 303
v/c Ratio 0.14 0.16 0.28 0.02 0.48 0.68 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 26.5 26.9 5.5 28.5 21.5 16.9 3.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 26.5 26.9 5.5 28.5 21.5 16.9 3.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 10 0 2 54 112 9
Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 40 22 13 116 206 37
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 625 583 655 205 1446 2273 2707
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.14 0.03 0.26 0.38 0.11
Intersection Summary
510
Section , Item B
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 160 16 526 368 350 159
v/c Ratio 0.80 0.25 0.19 0.76 0.81 0.80 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 53.1 23.5 52.5 27.9 51.8 50.8 12.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.5
Total Delay (s/veh) 53.1 23.5 52.5 27.9 51.8 60.8 12.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 208 72 11 224 233 220 50
Queue Length 95th (ft) #354 123 33 364 #396 #367 89
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 364 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 456 901 237 733 494 495 1059
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 116 592
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.18 0.07 0.72 0.74 0.92 0.34
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
511
Section , Item B
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 260 917 496 339
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.61 0.70 0.73 0.41
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.3 30.3 9.0 24.3 3.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.3 30.3 9.6 24.3 3.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 81 128 141 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 80 203 360 323 48
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 636 655 1678 1106 1104
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 380 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.41 0.71 0.45 0.31
Intersection Summary
512
Section , Item B
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 73 275 3 341 689 329
v/c Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.56 0.01 0.46 0.64 0.15
Control Delay (s/veh) 22.8 22.7 8.5 27.0 20.7 18.2 4.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 22.8 22.7 8.5 27.0 20.7 18.2 4.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 18 0 1 42 81 12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 62 56 9 103 171 53
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 717 748 828 198 1547 2171 3077
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.33 0.02 0.22 0.32 0.11
Intersection Summary
513
Section , Item B
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 250 20 368 265 339 183
v/c Ratio 0.70 0.38 0.20 0.47 0.69 0.73 0.18
Control Delay (s/veh) 43.9 22.9 49.0 9.6 43.2 41.4 11.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1
Total Delay (s/veh) 43.9 22.9 49.0 9.6 43.2 42.0 12.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 137 94 10 46 129 169 49
Queue Length 95th (ft) 264 187 38 135 258 314 101
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 388 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 565 1126 278 929 521 672 1333
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 101 568
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.22 0.07 0.40 0.51 0.59 0.24
Intersection Summary
514
Section , Item B
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 240 611 484 297
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.70 0.38
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.6 29.4 5.6 23.1 3.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.6 29.4 5.9 23.1 3.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 72 66 132 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 85 188 176 310 46
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 651 670 1696 1184 1103
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 507 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.37 0.51 0.41 0.27
Intersection Summary
515
Section , Item B
Queues
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR SET SER NWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 11 33 521 4 948
v/c Ratio 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.20 0.00 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.0 16.9 9.7 2.2 0.5 2.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.0 16.9 9.7 2.2 0.5 2.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 2 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 13 17 41 1 78
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1099 3588 1938 3391
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 125
Base Capacity (vph) 1168 802 694 2945 1568 3351
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.18 0.00 0.28
Intersection Summary
516
Section , Item B
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 75 91 6 381 870 303
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.29 0.26 0.03 0.49 0.69 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 28.2 28.6 4.9 30.8 23.2 18.3 3.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 28.2 28.6 4.9 30.8 23.2 18.3 3.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 24 0 2 58 122 11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 74 21 14 126 227 41
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 602 582 635 197 1459 2141 2613
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.03 0.26 0.41 0.12
Intersection Summary
517
Section , Item B
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 160 16 526 368 357 159
v/c Ratio 0.80 0.26 0.20 0.76 0.81 0.80 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 53.5 23.6 52.6 27.7 52.2 51.3 12.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.5
Total Delay (s/veh) 53.5 23.6 52.6 27.7 52.2 63.6 12.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 208 72 11 224 233 226 50
Queue Length 95th (ft) #354 123 33 364 #396 #379 89
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 364 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 454 896 236 731 492 493 1054
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 115 592
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.18 0.07 0.72 0.75 0.94 0.34
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
518
Section , Item B
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 265 260 917 502 339
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.64 0.72 0.75 0.42
Control Delay (s/veh) 19.5 33.4 10.9 26.8 3.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 19.5 33.4 11.6 26.8 3.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 90 163 159 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 215 437 348 51
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 634 598 1620 1060 1073
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 9 373 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.44 0.74 0.47 0.32
Intersection Summary
519
Section , Item B
Queues
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR SET NWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 53 172 1374 676
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.32 0.42 0.66 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 20.0 26.3 7.9 7.7 4.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 20.0 26.3 7.9 7.7 4.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 12 0 99 34
Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 49 45 206 74
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1099 3588 1938 1656
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150
Base Capacity (vph) 712 369 710 3098 3082
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.14 0.24 0.44 0.22
Intersection Summary
520
Section , Item B
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 79 275 3 341 738 329
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.27 0.56 0.01 0.47 0.66 0.15
Control Delay (s/veh) 24.0 23.7 8.6 28.0 21.6 18.6 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.0 23.7 8.6 28.0 21.6 18.6 4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 21 0 1 44 90 13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 68 57 9 106 186 53
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 697 725 813 193 1439 2178 3042
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.02 0.24 0.34 0.11
Intersection Summary
521
Section , Item B
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 250 20 368 265 376 183
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.38 0.21 0.47 0.70 0.76 0.18
Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 24.1 50.3 9.9 45.8 41.7 11.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2
Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 24.1 50.3 9.9 45.8 42.9 11.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 104 11 54 140 200 50
Queue Length 95th (ft) 267 190 38 140 #262 345 99
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 388 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 523 1063 267 927 480 687 1308
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 141 608
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.24 0.07 0.40 0.55 0.69 0.26
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
522
Section , Item B
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 240 611 519 297
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.72 0.37
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.8 30.9 5.5 23.5 3.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.8 30.9 5.8 23.5 3.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 75 67 147 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 85 193 177 329 45
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 655 609 1679 1186 1104
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 6 521 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.40 0.53 0.44 0.27
Intersection Summary
523
Section , Item B
Appendix D – Detailed Collision Data
524
Section , Item B
= TIJUIC SWITRS GIS Map I 1V I SafeTREC, UC Berkeley @EN Map SWITRS Tools Options Layers Basemaps Print Help Q. 5 U Results
Selected Factors:

Date 01/01/2018-12/31/2022 County Fresno
City All
Result Summary:
15,470 oF 15,770 98.193) crashes mapped
185 crashes selected. Clear Selection
wy.tjAOiO
J
2 4>
£iVa!1bt Fowler
Easton
Fowler SuVvh Canal
E CIr FO
Olewider
I f Z
525
Section 10, Item B
S’c. zarc
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
Crash Severity Count %
Crashes
1 - Fata1 9 4.36%
2 - nj_ n/ ' 5e f- = 16
3 - njl ■Othe r 11 '.sibl e; 53 23.6 %
_ - - (Complaint of Pam 1Q 7 H7.Sui
: v
3 - Inj uFy :C'th er 4 - Inj u n/ (C □ mp lai nt
Visible) of Pain '
1 - Fate
Crash Seventy
♦ - Fata • 5 - Inury (Othe 1' VisiDe■ ® a - iniury i"Compia nt o f z - i'Seve-5. Pain <
526
Section 10, Item B
E
:- c _ rc
Number of Crashes by Type of Crash
Type of Crash Count %
-- . jt E’.czsc 0 G 0096
A- Head-On 6 3-24
£ - Sidesvy pe 12 649
C - Pear End 34
D - Broadside 42 Z2.7G9E
E - Hit 0b|ecr 23 15.14%
F - Overturned 4 2.16%
G - ■ 'ehicle Pedestrian 6 3-M«
H - Other 3 ■.62%
135 Crashes
10 c
5°
z CT
■ *>'
z
z
Type ofCrash
® - - - j l Stated L A - nead-Or
# E - Hit Object
® C-Rear B - Sides ±nc 1
,vise
D - Broadside
r--Other
- - Overturned G - verjc e/Pedestna'-
527
Section 10, Item B
Ei;.Day of Week and Time
Number of Crashes per Day of Week per Time
185Crashes
25-00 - Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
□
21:00-23:59 1 2 0 2 2 3 2
18:00-20:59 8 0 2 2 7 5 3 c ■5:00-17:59 7 5 n 6 9 4 1
12:00-14 50 5 3 4 5 3 5 3
09:00-' 1:59 1 5 1 2 2 4 2
10 06:00-08:59 7 3 12 4 4 4 0
03:00-05:59 O □ 0 3 3 2 0 1
00:00-02:59 3 1 1 3 0 4 2
1 - Monday 2 -Tuesday 3- Wednesday 4 -Thursday 5 -Friday 6 - Saturday 7- Sunday 528
Section 10, Item B
B\ Tta-y Crasri Factor (
c C-'l '
Number of Crashes by PCF Violation
Crashes
MM i \
PCF Violation
0 CC-U'knc-v. 1
0 Oc -
lTi- ip roper - assing
09 - Aina m i- ?■■=■Rig t c? a.
i - ~ -=F ■:Sigrz 1 =-r £ rrj
D 1 - _-
r
'' : r;c ;r ESz.r; -.c ._ "z=r ;i-= r- L = n Ce Z" - IC rr- ,-r Z'-jc 0 Oj - j -G= _
'e Sceed
0 £>S- rnproper Tumiric
' 1- - =zazz■a■ ■ D;at zn
0 G
- - _nsa-e _=- e ZFarige
i-Dtrc- -i-u-.t- jr Ze.ZErZZ' a - ;'
529
Section 10, Item B
Appendix E – Signal Warrant Worksheets
530
Section 10, Item B
LEGEND
X Existing Plus Project AM XPM
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
SR 99 SB Ramps / Clovis Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 531
Section 10, Item B
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Golden State Blvd / Jefferson Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

X XAM PM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 533
Section 10, Item B
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Clovis Ave / Lincoln Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAMXPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 534
Section 10, Item B
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Golden State Blvd / Clayton Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

X XPM AM XPM
XAM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 536
Section 10, Item B
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Merced St / SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
PM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 537
Section 10, Item B
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Merced St / SR 99 SB NB Ramps
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
X AM
PM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2026
FROM: MATT FLOOD, Community & Economic Development Director SUBJECT: CONSIDER: Adopting Ordinance No. 2026-05 Modifying the Regulations related to Tobacco Retailers, Council waive the First Reading of the Ordinance by title only and Conduct a Public Hearing for Ordinance No. 2026-05. Staff Recommends: Council Waive the First Reading of Ordinance No. 2026-05 Repealing and Replacing Chapter 20 of Title 5 relating to the regulation of Tobacco Retailers by title only; Open the Public Hearing; Close the Public Hearing; and Adopt Ordinance No. 2026-05.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Together with the Fresno County Department of Health, staff has requested the proposed updates to the Chapter of the Fowler Municipal Code dealing with regulations related to Tobacco Retailers.

BACKGROUND
Staff was contacted by the division of County Health that promotes anti-tobacco policies and requested that they work with staff on updates to various aspects of the City of Fowler’s policies related to tobacco.

One part of this is to update the chapter of the Fowler Municipal Code (FMC) that lays out the rules and regulations for Tobacco Retailers within the City Limits.

These regulations will still be in the same place within the FMC (Title 5, Chapter 20), retain almost all of the rules that have been there, and add elements that help update and clarify the law.

Some of the significant changes are:
 Modernized definitions, prohibitions, and restrictions, including new and detailed definitions for electronic smoking devices, flavored tobacco or others related to youthtargeted marketing schemes, as well as prohibiting use of vending machines, “loosie” sales, and other harmful practices;
 Establishes strict locational restrictions, including minimum distance requirements of 1,000 feet from youth-oriented facilities or other tobacco retailers; 540
Section 10 , Item C
 Imposes a population-based cap (one per 2,500 residents) on the number of tobacco retailer licenses;
 Explicitly prohibits tobacco retailing in pharmacies and at locations licensed for cannabis retail activity (some references to cannabis are put at the suggestion of the County to “future-proof” the ordinance language;
 Prohibits delivery sales of tobacco products, including online, app-based, and curbside transactions;
 Contains comprehensive pricing and packaging regulations, including minimum price floors, minimum package sizes, prohibitions on discounts and coupons, and requirements for child-resistant packaging;
 Prohibitions on free samples, promotional pricing, and multi-pack discounts;  Expands penalty structures by maintaining escalating fines and license consequences but tying them more explicitly to both unlicensed activity and general violations, and by formalizing ineligibility periods for license reissuance;  Strengthens the application and licensing process, making it more thorough than the current ordinance;
 Enhances procedural clarity for notices, hearings, and appeals, including defined timelines and processes, representing a more formalized administrative enforcement structure than the current ordinance.

Enforcement will be coordinated between Code Enforcement, Fowler Police Department, and the applicable County, State, and Federal authorities.

PUBLIC NOTICE
A notice of Public Hearing was published in the Business Journal on April 10, 2026, notifying the public that this ordinance was being considered by Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
“This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.”, qualifying for the “common sense” exemption as a policy change.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with the following general plan goals or policies:

General Plan Goal CH-2
Impacts from pollution are minimized through thoughtful and deliberate land use planning.

FISCAL IMPACT
No significant fiscal impacts are foreseen at this time.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
As no product or service is being procured, the Procurement Process does not apply. 541
Section 10 , Item C

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Ordinance No. 2026-05
542
Section 10 , Item C

Page 1 of 22 ends

Fowler City CouncilApril 21, 2026

Fowler City Council
April 21, 2026