there is no feasible alternative to such development of the subject property and provided that the following conditions are met:
(a) The record property owner grants an avigation easement to the City of Fresno.
(b) The record property owner executes an agreement in favor of the City of Fresno, whereby the property owner shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City and the ALUC, and every officer and employee thereof from any and all loss, liability, damages, costs, suits or claims arising out of the location of the development within the 65 CNEL contour. (c) New residential structures shall incorporate noise insulation in compliance with Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations such that interior noise levels are reduced to no more than 45 db CNEL.
(6) An acoustical analysis shall be required prior to the approval of a special permit (site plan or conditional use permit) for any new residential use, transient lodging, school, library, hospital, nursing home, day nursery, church, auditorium or a concert hall located within a 65 or greater CNEL contour. For single family residential proposals, an acoustical analysis shall be required as a condition of subdivision map approval, said analysis to be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. The acoustical analysis shall be completed in a manner consistent with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. A special permit for the uses listed above shall not be approved unless the acoustical analysis demonstrates that interior noise levels attributable to exterior sources does not exceed 45 db CNEL in any habitable room with windows and doors closed. In quantifying aircraft noise exposure of the project site, the acoustical analysis shall include consideration of engine run up noise where applicable. A single report may suffice for all similar proposals within the same CNEL contour.
(7) Within the 70 CNEL contour, new or redeveloped schools, hospitals, nursing homes, libraries, day nurseries, churches, auditoriums, and amphitheaters shall be prohibited. New residential uses (excluding transient lodging) shall be prohibited, except as provided for in Policy No. (8), below.
(8) Existing residential uses lying within the 70 CNEL contour, that conform to the land use designations of this plan, may be remodeled in such a way that does not increase the floor space of the residence, or rebuilt if destroyed by fire, explosion or other
catastrophic means, consistent with regulations adopted by the local jurisdiction.
(9) When applying the noise compatibility criteria listed in Table 1 to a given location, the basis for evaluation shall be the maximum CNEL contour shown in the CLUP.
(10) If a noise analysis, including noise monitoring, indicates that project noise exposure may be higher or lower than indicated by the Airport Land Use Noise Compatibility Criteria, Table 1, due to site-specific conditions or changes in Airport/aircraft operations, the noise exposure used for project evaluation may be adjusted at the discretion of the ALUC.
3.2 Overflight
Noise from individual aircraft can be intrusive and annoying in locations beyond the limits of the mapped noise contours. Sensitivity to aircraft overflights varies from one person to another. The purpose of overflight compatibility policies is to help notify people about the presence of overflights near airports so that they can make informed decisions regarding acquisition or lease of property in the affected areas. Overflight compatibility is particularly important with regard to residential land uses.
(1) The overflight compatibility of proposed land uses within the AIA shall be evaluated in accordance with the policies set forth in this section.
(2) Except when overriding circumstances exist, a condition for approval of any residential development proposal (i.e., zone change, subdivision map, conditional use permit, site plan review) within the AIA, as defined herein, shall be the dedication of an avigation easement to the City of Fresno.
(3) An Avigation Easement and Agreement shall be required for all development proposals (commercial, industrial or residential) within the 65 CNEL contour. The avigation easement shall contain the following property rights:
(a) Right-of-flight at any altitude above acquired easement surfaces.
(b) Right to generate noise, vibrations, fumes, dust and fuel particle emissions.
(c) Right-of-entry to remove, mark, or light any structures or growths above easement surfaces.
(d) Right to prohibit creation of electrical interference, unusual light sources, and other hazards to aircraft flight.
(e) Right to prevent erection or growth of all objects above acquired easement surfaces.
The easement surfaces acquired shall be based on Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations except that no easement surface less than 35 feet above ground shall be acquired.
(4) A Covenant shall be required as a further condition for approval of residential development proposals within the AIA and all development proposals within the 65 CNEL contour. The local jurisdiction shall, except where overriding circumstances exist, require the property owner(s) to record a covenant providing the following:
(a) That it is understood by the owners and owners' successors in interest that the real property in question lies close to the Fresno Chandler Executive Airport and that the operation of the airport and the landing and take-off of aircraft may generate high noise levels which will affect the habitability and quiet enjoyment of the property.
(b) That the owners covenant to accept and acknowledge the operation of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport. (5) The above avigation easement, covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded in the office of the Fresno County Clerk/Recorder and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the present and subsequent owners of the property. (6) Effective January 1, 2004, California state statutes (Business and Professional Code Sections 1102.6, 1103.4 and 1353) require that, as part of residential real estate transactions, information be disclosed regarding whether the property is situated within an AIA.
Buyer notification shall be accomplished by the use of real estate disclosure statements for property within the AIA. The disclosure statements shall notify the buyers of property located within the AIA of Fresno Chandler Executive Airport and that aircraft overflights may affect the habitability and quiet enjoyment of the property.
3.3 Safety
The intent of land use safety compatibility is to minimize the risks associated with an off-airport aircraft accident or emergency landing. Risks both to people and property on the ground in the vicinity of the airport and to people on board aircraft are considered. The safety compatibility of land use development is outlined in Table 3. The zone boundaries are based upon general aviation aircraft accident location data contained in the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook along with data regarding the runway configuration and aircraft operational procedures at FCH.
(1) Land uses or land use characteristics which may affect safe air navigation or, because of their nature and proximity to an airport, may be incompatible with the airport shall be avoided in the vicinity of FCH.
(2) The criteria which shall be used to evaluate whether a land use is acceptable with respect to its airport proximity are set forth in Table 3, entitled Airport Land Use Safety Compatibility Criteria. The indicated Safety Compatibility Zones (SCZs), as defined in the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, shall be used.
NOTE: Within SCZs 3 and 4 the following shall apply:
(a) Existing development that conforms to existing zoning regulations may be rebuilt in the event it is destroyed by fire or Act of God in accordance with regulations of the local jurisdiction.
(b) The regulations identified in the California Land Use Handbook, are not intended to take development rights such that the economic viable use of land is unduly restricted.
Therefore, development of vacant property or redevelopment of property in accordance with the zoning regulations shall not be prohibited on the basis of the restrictions set forth in Table 3. This provision shall not apply to schools, hospitals, nursing homes, churches, auditoriums, concert halls,
amphitheaters or other uses that would result in a large concentration of people.
(3) Land uses which attract wildlife that pose a hazard to aviation activities are a special concern adjacent to airports. Examples of land use which may attract hazardous wildlife include landfills and bodies of standing water. In reviewing a project for safety compatibility, the most current version of the FAA Advisory Circular AC No. 150/5200-33 (Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports) shall be considered. The review area identified in this
circular is outlined as the boundary within 10,000 feet of the Airport Operations Area.
3.4 Airspace Protection
The objective of airspace protection policies is to ensure that structures and other uses of the land do not cause hazards to aircraft in flight in the airport vicinity.
Hazards to flight include physical obstructions to the navigable airspace, wildlife hazards (particularly bird strikes) and land use characteristics that create visual or electronic interference with aircraft navigation or communication. Boundaries of this zone represent the imaginary surfaces defined for the airport in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77. (1) No structure, tree, or other object shall be permitted to exceed the height limits established in accordance with Part 77, Subpart C, of the FAR. This criterion applies unless, in the case of a proposed object or growing tree, one or more of the following conditions exist:
(a) The object would be substantially shielded by existing permanent structures or terrain in a manner such that it clearly would not affect the safety of air navigation;
(b) The FAA has conducted an aeronautical study and either determined that the object would not result in a hazard to air navigation or made recommendations for the object's proper marking and lighting as an obstruction, and FAA
recommendations, if any, are properly implemented;
(c) The object is otherwise exempted from the requirements of FAR Part 77.
In the case of an existing object, this criterion also applies unless the object exceeded the prescribed height limits at the time the Plan is adopted or amended, marking and lighting may still be required.
(2) No object shall be permitted to be erected that, because of height or other factors, would result in an increase in the minimum ceiling or visibility criteria for an existing or proposed instrument approach procedure to any runway.
(3) The FAR Part 77 surfaces depicted on the Airspace Protection Surfaces (Sheet 2 through Sheet 6 of the Airport Layout Plans) shall be used in conjunction with the above airspace policies to determine whether the height of an object is acceptable.
CHAPTER 4: COMPATIBILITY ZONE MAPS
4.1 Noise Contours
The 1999 FCH AMP provides the activity forecast used in the contour calculations. Refer to Figure 1 Environs Plan for the Noise Contours at FCH.
4.2 Safety Zones
The California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (Handbook), October 2011, provides guidance for Safety Zone Configuration. These zones are delineated based on the type of airport, size of airport, and operational characteristic. Refer to Figure 1 Environs Plan for the Safety Compatibility Zones at FCH.
4.3 Airspace Protection Surfaces
Part 77 of the FAR, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, establishes standards for determining obstructions to navigable airspace and the effects of such obstructions on the safe and efficient use of that airspace. Refer to Sheet 2 through Sheet 6 of the Airport Layout Plans for the Airspace Protection Surfaces.
4.4 Airport Layout Plan
The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) is an FAA approved document that depicts planned development at the airport. Refer to Sheet 1 of the Airport Layout Plans for the 2011 FAA approved ALP. For evaluation purposes the most recent ALP on file with FAA shall be used.
CHAPTER 5: PROCEDURAL POLICIES
5.1 Types of Actions Reviewed
Review of local actions pertaining to airport land use compatibility is one of the fundamental reasons for the formation of an ALUC. The law specifies that local jurisdictions must refer certain actions to the ALUC for review. Local land use actions included in this category are proposed adoption or amendment of general plans, specific plans, zoning ordinances, and building regulations affecting land within an AIA. Also required to be submitted for ALUC review are several types of airport development plans. ALUC review of three categories of airport plans is mandatory in accordance with state law. These reviews are: airport master plan, construction plan for new airports and airport expansion plan.
5.2 Project Information
Project review materials, must be submitted to acting staff of the Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). A project description, including relevant land use information as well as detailed geographical location maps, site plans, architectural drawings are required for a review request.
5.3 Timing of Review
Time is a factor with regard to the project review process in two ways:
(1) Timing of Project Submittal. Plans and projects shall be referred to the ALUC at the earliest reasonable point in time so that the Commission’s review can be duly considered by the local jurisdiction prior to formalizing its actions. Depending upon the type of plan or project and the normal scheduling of meetings, ALUC review can be done before, after, or concurrently with review by the local planning commission and other advisory bodies, but must be accomplished before final action by the decision making bodies. (2) Response Time Requirement. The ALUC must respond within 60 days of referral to local agency requests for a consistency determination on plans or projects for which submittal is mandatory.
However, this response period does not begin until such time as all information necessary for accomplishment of the project review has been submitted to the Commission.
5.4 ALUC Staff Responsibilities
(1) Coordinate with local agency staff to obtain information regarding specific projects to be reviewed by the ALUC;
(2) Provide general assistance to local agency staff regarding airport compatibility issues;
(3) Work with ALUC chairman regarding meeting schedules and agendas;
(4) Prepare staff reports and meeting agendas;
(5) Issue required public notices of pending Commission actions; (6) Record meeting minutes;
(7) Notifying local agencies of Commissions decisions on items submitted for review.
5.5 ALUC Action Choices
ALUC choices of action on a land use plan or project submitted for review may either be consistent or inconsistent with the compatibility plan. Although the Aeronautics Act (Sections 21676(a) and 21676.5(a)) mentions only the above two choices of action and no mention is made about finding a proposal consistent with conditions attached. The Fresno County ALUC has decided to approve projects with conditions attached. When a finding of consistency is made contingent upon certain conditions, the conditions should be limited in scope and described in a manner which allows compliance to be clearly assessed.
CHAPTER 6: INITIAL REVIEW OF GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
There are no conflicts between the recently adopted CLUP and the local jurisdiction plans. As outlined by the Handbook, consistency does not require being identical. It means only that the concepts, standards, physical characteristics, and resulting consequences of proposed action must not conflict with the intent of law or the compatibility plan to which the comparison is made.
The Handbook specifically outlines that to be fully consistent with the compatibility plan, a general plan must not have any direct conflicts with the compatibility plan; and must delineate a mechanism or process for ensuring that individual land use development proposals comply with the ALUC criteria.
SECTION B
TABLES, FIGURES & AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN
TABLE 1
AIRPORT LAND USE NOISE COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA
LAND USE CATEGORY
Exterior Noise Exposure
(CNEL)
60-65 65-70 70-75
Residential, Lodging, and Care
*Residential (including single-family, multi-family) 0 _ _ Retirement homes, residential support facilities, hospitals, nursing homes, large child day care centers, adult day care facilities
0 0 _
*Hotels, motels, other transient lodging 0 0 _
*Mobile Homes 0 _ _
Public and Institutional
* Schools, libraries 0 0 _
*Places of worship, auditoriums, concert halls, theaters, indoor arenas 0 0 _
Cemeteries, Parking + + 0
Commercial and Industrial
Offices, service commercial, retail, shopping centers,
restaurants
+ 0 _
Wholesale, warehousing, research and development, light industrial
+ + 0
Extractive industry, industrial, manufacturing, utilities + + 0 Agricultural, and Recreational
Cropland + + +
Nature preserves, Livestock breeding, Zoos 0 0 _
Regional parks, athletic fields, golf courses, outdoor spectator sports, water recreational facilities, horse stables
+ 0 0
Amphitheaters 0 _ _
TABLE 1 (cont.)
AIRPORT LAND USE NOISE COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA
LEGEND
Symbol Land Use
Acceptability
Interpretation/Conditions
+ Compatible The activities associated with the specific land use may be carried out with essentially no interference from
aircraft noise.
0 Conditional The indicated noise exposure will cause interference with the activities. Building structure must be capable of attenuating noise to the indoor acceptable CNEL,
standard construction methods will normally suffice.
Indoor Uses: Noise exposure may cause moderate
interference with indoor activities, extensive
construction features required to make the indoor
environment acceptable.
Outdoor Uses: CNEL is acceptable for outdoor
activities, although some noise interference may occur, caution should be exercised with regards to noisesensitive uses. _ Incompatible Unacceptable noise interference upon these activities will occur indoor and outdoor. Adequate structural
noise insulation is not practical under most
circumstances. Severe noise interference makes
outdoor activities unacceptable
* Acoustical
Analysis
Required
An acoustical analysis shall be performed by an
individual or firm experienced in Acoustical
Engineering
TABLE 2
INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION (dBA)
CNEL RANGE (Annual Average)
GENERALIZED LAND USE 60-65 65-70 70-75
Residential AS -- --
Transient Lodging AS 251dBA --
Schools, Hospitals and Nursing Homes AS 251dBA --
Commercial AS AS 25dBA
Manufacturing2 + AS 25dBA
Legend
+ Uses normally acceptable.
-- Uses should not be permitted.
1 Acoustical studies may indicate a need for additional insulation in noise sensitive living areas such as sleeping quarters and areas of the facility used at night for relaxing and conversing. 2 Noise level reductions are for those portions of the buildings where the public is received, office areas, and noise sensitive areas where noise levels are low.
AS Acoustical studies shall be performed to determine if insulation should be added to sensitive occupancy areas.
TABLE 3
AIRPORT LAND USE SAFETY COMPATABLITY CRITERIA
LAND USE CHARACTERISTIC
SAFETY ZONES
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6
Residential Uses -- (A) (B) (C) -- +
Other Uses in Structures -- (D,E) (E) (E) -- +
Other Uses Not in Structures (D,F) (D) + + -- +
SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS (IN OR OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES)
Distracting Lights or Glare -- -- -- -- -- +
Sources of Smoke or Electrical
Interference -- -- -- -- -- +
Attractor of Birds -- -- -- -- -- +
NOTES
1. See Figure 1, Safety Compatibility Zones.
2. Refer to Figure 2 for dimensional layout of the Safety Compatibility Zones.
INTERPRETATION
+ Compatible: Use is acceptable with little or no risks. ( ) Conditional: Land use proposals that fall within this category must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by Commission or jurisdiction having authority. The Commission or jurisdiction having authority may determine the use to be acceptable under conditions cited below.
A Density no greater than 1 dwelling unit per 3 acres.
B Density no greater than 2 dwelling units per acre.
C Density no greater than 5 dwelling units per acre.
D No uses attracting more than 10 persons per acre.
E No schools, hospitals, nursing homes, or similar uses.
F Characteristic cannot reasonably be avoided or located outside the indicated safety zone. -- Incompatible: Use is unacceptable due to associated high risks.
City of Fresno Municipal Code
Chapter 10
Article 1. Noise Regulations
§ 10-101. Title
This article shall be known as the "Noise Ordinance of the City of Fresno." (Orig. Ord. 1076; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1972).
§ 10-102. Definitions
(a) Unless the particular provision or the context requires, the definitions and provisions contained in this section shall govern the construction, meaning, and application of words and phrases used in this article, and, except to the extent that a particular word or phrase is otherwise specifically defined in this section, the definitions and provisions contained in Article 2 (commencing with Section 1-201) of Chapter 1 of this Code shall also govern the construction, meaning, and application of words and phrases used in this article. The definition of each word or phrase shall constitute, to the extent applicable, the definition of each word or phrase which is derivative from it, or from which it is a derivative, as the case may be.
(b) Ambient Noise. "Ambient noise" is the all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment, being usually a composite of sounds from many sources near and far. For the purpose of this ordinance, ambient noise level is the level obtained when the noise level is averaged over a period of fifteen minutes, without inclusion of the offending noise, at the location and time of day at which a comparison with the offending noise is to be made. Where the ambient noise level is less than that designated in this section, however, the noise level specified herein shall be deemed to be the ambient noise level for that location.
DISTRICT TIME SOUND LEVEL DECIBELS
Residential 10 pm to 7 am 50
Residential 7 pm to 10 pm 55
Residential 7 am to 7 pm 60
Commercial 10 pm to 7 am 60
Commercial 7 am to 10 pm 65
Industrial anytime 70
(c) Decibel. "Decibel" means a unit of sound level when the base of the logarithm is the tenth root of ten and the quantities concerned are proportional to power. (d) Emergency Work. "Emergency work" means work necessary to restore property to a safe condition following a public calamity, work required to repair structures or otherwise protect persons or property from an imminent exposure to danger or damage, or work by private or public utilities when restoring or repairing utility service.
(e) Frequency. "Frequency" of a function periodic in time means the reciprocal of the primitive period.
The unit is the hertz and shall be specified.
(f) Hertz. "Hertz" shall mean the complete sequence of values of a periodic quantity which occurs during a period.
(g) Microbar. "Microbar" means a unit of pressure commonly used in acoustics and is equal to one dyne per square centimeter.
(h) Period. "Period" of a periodic quantity means the smallest increment of time for which the function repeats itself.
(i) Periodic Quantity. "Periodic quantity" means oscillating quantity, the values of which recur for equal increments of time.
(j) Sound Level. "Sound level" (noise level), in decibels (dB) is the sound pressure level as measured with the "A" weighting and slow response by a sound level meter. (k) Sound Level Meter. "Sound level meter" means an instrument including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and frequency weighting networks for the measurement of sound levels which satisfies the pertinent specifications published by the American National Standards Institute, New York, New York, in "American Standard Sound Level Meters for Measurement of Noise and Other Sounds," S1.4-1971, or the most recent revision thereof.
(l) Motor Vehicles. "Motor vehicles" includes, but is not limited to, minibikes and go-carts. (m) Sound Amplifying Equipment. "Sound amplifying equipment" means any machine or device for the amplification of the human voice, music, or any other sound. "Sound amplifying equipment" shall not include standard automobile radios or tape players when used and heard only by the occupants of the vehicle in which the automobile radio is installed. "Sound amplifying equipment," as used in this article, shall not include warning devices on authorized emergency vehicles, or horns or other warning devices on any vehicle, which are used only for traffic safety purposes. (n) Sound Truck. "Sound Truck" means any motor vehicle, or any other vehicle regardless of motive power, whether in motion or stationary, having mounted thereon, or attached thereto, any sound amplifying equipment. (Orig. Ord. 1076; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1973). § 10-103. Decibel Measurement Criteria
Decibel measurement made pursuant to the provisions of this article shall be based on a reference sound pressure of 0.0002 microbars as measured with a sound level meter using the "A" weighted network.
(Orig. Ord. 1076; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1972).
§ 10-104. Monitoring Procedures
The following procedures shall be employed for monitoring and evaluating noise in the community unless otherwise specified in this Article:
(a) The evaluation shall be conducted any time of the day or night when the offending noise source is being operated.
(b) For outside measurements, the location selected for monitoring shall be at a point at least ten feet from any building, wall, or obstruction (trees, bushes, etc.) whenever possible. In cases where no point on the property line satisfies this criteria, readings will be taken as far as possible from the nearest obstruction and such distance will be noted. For inside measurements, the monitoring location shall be at least three feet from any wall.
(c) The sound level meter shall be equipped with an omnidirectional microphone. (d) No individual other than the operator shall be within ten feet of the sound level meter during the sample period.
(e) The ambient noise level shall be determined with the offending noise source not in operation, in the following manner:
(1) Calibrate the sound level meter in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. (2) Set the sound level meter on the "A" weighted network at slow response. (3) Without the offending noise source in operation, set the microphone in a vertical position on the complaining party's property with the microphone head approximately four feet above the ground or floor. The operator shall face the noise source and record the meter's instantaneous response (reading) observed at fifteen second intervals for a period of fifteen minutes. The arithmetical average (mean) reading is interpreted as the ambient noise level of that sampling point. (f) With the offending noise source in operation, the operator shall again record the instantaneous response at the same location at fifteen second intervals for a fifteen minute period, or, for a noise source of less than fifteen minutes, the operator shall record the instantaneous response at fifteen second intervals for the time the offending noise source is in operation. The arithmetical average (mean) response level recorded while the offending noise source is in operation is interpreted as the offending noise level.
(Orig. Ord. 1076; Am. Ord. 5331, 1958; Rep. Ord. 5376, 1958; Added Ord. 72-163, 1972). § 10-105. Excessive Noise Prohibited
No person shall make, cause, or suffer or permit to be made or caused upon any premises or upon any public street, alley, or place within the city, any sound or noise which causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing or working in the area, unless such noise or sound is specifically authorized by or in accordance with this article. The provisions of this section shall apply to, but shall not be limited to, the control, use, and operation of the following noise sources:
(a) Radios, musical instruments, phonographs, television sets, or other machines or devices used for the amplification, production, or reproduction of sound or the human voice. (b) Animals or fowl creating, generating, or emitting any cry or behavioral sound. (c) Machinery or equipment, such as fans, pumps, air conditioning units, engines, turbines, compressors, generators, motors or similar devices, equipment, or apparatus. (d) Construction equipment or work, including the operation, use or employment of pile drivers, hammers, saws, drills, derricks, hoists, or similar construction equipment or tools. (Orig. Ord. 1076; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1972; Am. Ord. 2001-41, § 1, 5-20-01; Am. Ord. 2014-16, § 2, eff. 4-18-14).
§ 10-106. Prima Facie Violation
Any noise or sound exceeding the ambient noise level at the property line of any person offended thereby, or, if a condominium or apartment house, within any adjoining living unit, by more than five decibels shall be deemed to be prima facie evidence of a violation of Section 8-305. (Orig. Ord. 1678; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1972).
§ 10-107. Schools, Hospitals, And Churches
No person shall create any noise on any street, sidewalk, or public place adjacent to any school, institution of learning, or church while the same is in use, or adjacent to any hospital, which noise unreasonably interferes with the workings of such institution or which disturbs or unduly annoys patients in the hospital, provided conspicuous signs are displayed in such street, sidewalk, or public place indicating the presence of a school, church, or hospital. (Orig. Ord. 3667; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1972).
§ 10-108. Public Address Systems
No person, other than personnel of law enforcement or governmental agencies, shall install, use or operate within the city a loudspeaker or sound amplifying equipment in a fixed or movable position or mounted upon any sound truck for the purposes of giving instructions, directions, talks, addresses, lectures or transmitting music to any person or assemblages of persons in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, park or other public property without first filing a registration statement and obtaining approval thereof as set forth in this section.
(a) Registration Statements: Filing. Every user of such sound amplifying equipment shall file a registration statement with the Controller five days prior to the date on which the sound amplifying equipment is intended to be used, which statement shall contain the following information:
(1) The name, address, and telephone number of both the owner and user of the sound amplifying equipment;
(2) The maximum sound producing power of the sound amplifying equipment which shall include the wattage to be used, the volume in decibels of sound which will be produced, and the approximate distance for which sound will be audible from the sound amplifying equipment; (3) The license and motor number if a sound truck is to be used; (4) A general description of the sound amplifying equipment which is to be used; and (5) The dates and times such equipment is intended to be used. (b) Registration Statements: Approval. The Controller shall return to the applicant within five working days an approved copy of the registration statement unless he finds that:
(1) Use of the equipment would constitute a detriment to traffic or pedestrian safety; or (2) The registration statement required reveals that the applicant would violate any provisions of this Code.
(c) Disapproval. In the event the registration statement is disapproved, the Controller shall endorse upon the statement his reasons for disapproval and return it forthwith to applicant. (d) Revocation of Suspension. Any registration statement approved hereunder shall be revocable and may be revoked by the Controller when a fact is found to exist which would have been a ground for refusal to approve same or when there has been a violation of any of the terms of this article. Said statement may be reinstated by the Controller upon terms or conditions reasonably calculated to alleviate the dereliction.
(e) Appeal. Any person aggrieved by any action of the Controller regarding a registration statement may appeal such decision under the procedures in Chapter 1, Article 4. If no appeal is filed within the time prescribed, the action of the Controller shall be final. (f) Regulations. The commercial and noncommercial use of such sound amplifying equipment shall be subject to the following regulations:
(1) The only sound permitted shall be either music or human speech, or both. (2) The operation of such sound amplifying equipment shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. each day.
(3) No sound emanating from such sound amplifying equipment shall exceed fifteen decibels above the ambient noise as measured at any property line.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (3) of this subsection, such sound amplifying equipment shall not be operated within two hundred feet of churches, schools or hospitals. (5) In any event, the volume of sound shall be so controlled that it will not be unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring, disturbing, or cause annoyance or discomfort to reasonable persons of normal sensitiveness within the area of audibility.
(g) Duration of Registration Statement. Registration statements approved pursuant to this section shall be valid for the period specified thereon by the Controller, which period shall not exceed one year.
Statements approved hereunder for a full year shall be automatically renewed from year to year without further application or filing, provided that the Controller may fix an earlier termination date for any such statement at any time following the initial renewal thereof, whenever he deems it in the public interest to do so, by mailing, at least five days prior to the date so fixed, a written notice of such fact to the applicant at the address shown in his application.
(h) Any registration statement requesting approval for the use of a loudspeaker or sound amplifying equipment on any mall street, as defined in Section 14-1801 of this Code, shall be filed with and approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation, rather than the Controller. In all other respects, the procedure set forth in this section shall be followed. The Director of Parks and Recreation shall notify the Controller of each such registration statement he approves. (Orig. Ord. 3667; Rep. and Added Ord. 72-163, 1972; Am. Ord. 75-136, § 2, eff. 1-30-76; Am. Ord. 80- 109, § 1, eff. 8-8-80; Am. Ord. 80-171, § 73, eff. 12-26-80; Am. Ord. 98-65, § 19, eff. 10-1-98; Am. Ord. 2005-14, § 37, eff. 4-9-05).
§ 10-109. Exceptions
The provisions of this article shall not apply to:
(a) Construction, repair or remodeling work accomplished pursuant to a building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, or other construction permit issued by the city or other governmental agency, or to site preparation and grading, provided such work takes place between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on any day except Sunday.
(b) Emergency work.
(c) Any act or acts which are prohibited by any law of the State of California or the United States. (Added Ord. 72-163, 1972; Am. Ord. 80-171, § 74, eff. 12-26-80). § 10-110. Permits
A permit may be issued authorizing noises prohibited by this article whenever it is found that the public interest will be served thereby or that extreme hardship will result from the strict enforcement hereof, as follows:
(a) Application for permit. Application for permits shall be in writing and shall contain the following information:
(1) The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant. (2) A general description of the equipment, apparatus, or other sound source to be utilized, and the area in which it will be utilized.
(3) An estimate of the maximum sound level which will be generated by the equipment, apparatus, or sound source to be utilized and the basis for such estimate. (4) The inclusive dates between which the sound will be generated. (5) Facts showing that the public interest will be served by the issuance of such permit or that extreme hardship will accrue to the applicant if such permit does not issue. (b) Criteria. Applications shall be filed with the Chief Administrative Officer of the City, who shall approve or disapprove same within five working days. The criteria which shall be considered by the Chief Administrative Officer in determining whether the requested permit shall issue will include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) The level of the noise for which a permit is sought. (2) The ambient noise level in the vicinity where the sound source will be utilized. (3) The proximity of the noise to residential sleeping facilities. (4) The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise will emanate. (5) The density of the inhabitation of the area within which the noise will emanate. (6) The time of the day or night the noise will occur.
(7) The duration of the noise.
(8) Whether the noise will be recurrent, intermittent, or constant. (c) Issuance of Permit. The Chief Administrative Officer shall issue the requested permit unless he finds, considering the aforementioned criteria, that the public interest will suffer thereby and that such public detriment exceeds the hardship to be suffered by the applicant if the permit is not issued. In the event the Chief Administrative Officer disapproves the application, he shall return same to the applicant with a statement of the reasons for such action. In approving a permit hereunder, the Chief Administrative Officer may impose such conditions as he deems necessary to protect the public interest. (d) Revocation or Suspension. Any permit issued hereunder shall be revocable and may be revoked by the Chief Administrative Officer when a fact is found to exist which would have been a ground for refusal to approve same or when there has been a violation of any of the terms or conditions thereof. (e) Repealed.
(f) Repealed. (Added Ord. 72-163, 1972; Am. Ord. 80-171, §§ 75, 76, eff. 12-26-80; Am. Ord. 81-157, § 28, eff. 12-11-81).
§ 10-111. Injunction
In addition to other remedies provided by law, the operation or maintenance of any device, instrument, vehicle or machinery in violation of any provision of this article, which operation or maintenance causes discomfort or annoyance to reasonable persons or normal sensitiveness or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or peace of residents in the area, shall be deemed, and is declared to be, a public nuisance and may be subject to abatement summarily by a restraining order or injunction issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. (Added Ord. 72-163, 1972).
Fresno County General Plan 6-1 October 2000
HEALTH AND SAFETY ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Planning for growth and development requires the consideration of a wide range of public safety issues. Safety hazards are naturally induced, such as seismic and geologic hazards, flooding, and wildland fire hazards. Some hazards are the result of natural hazards that are exacerbated by human activity and alteration of the natural environment, such as dam failure, urban fires, and development in sensitive areas such as floodplains or areas subject to erosion and landslides. Finally, some hazards are manmade, including airport crash hazards, hazardous materials, and crime. In addition to safety issues related to hazardous conditions, the planning process should account for other issues related to community health and safety, such as noise exposure.
Many of the health and safety risks associated with development can be avoided through locational decisions made at the planning stages of development, while others may be lessened through the use of mitigation measures in the planning and land use regulation process. This element outlines Fresno County’s strategy for ensuring the maintenance of a healthy and safe physical environment.
The Health and Safety Element is divided into seven sections: Emergency Management and Response; Fire Hazards; Flood Hazards; Seismic and Geological Hazards; Airport Hazards; Hazardous Materials; and Noise.
A. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE
Although Fresno County seeks to minimize hazards and reduce safety risks, in the event of an emergency, quick and effective response is vital. The County’s Emergency Response Program is designed to respond to a wide range of emergency situations.
Policies in this section seek to create an effective emergency response and management system for Fresno County through periodic evaluation of the Emergency Response Program, by ensuring that vital public infrastructure is designed to remain operational during and after a major disaster event, by siting critical emergency response facilities as far from potential disaster impact areas as is practical, and through continuing public education and outreach on emergency preparedness and disaster response programs. Related policies are included in Section PF-H, Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services.
Goal HS-A To protect public health and safety by preparing for, responding to, and recovering from the effects of natural or technological disasters.
Policies
Policy HS-A.1 The County shall, through the Fresno County Operational Area Master Emergency Services Plan, maintain the capability to effectively respond to emergency incidents, including maintenance of an emergency operations center.
Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-2 Fresno County General Plan
Definitions for the Health and Safety Element
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone: A regulatory zone, delineated by the State Geologist, within which sitespecific geologic studies are required to identify and avoid fault rupture hazards prior to subdivision of land and/or construction of most structures for human occupancy.
Critical Facility: Facilities which either provide emergency services or house or serve many people who would be injured or killed in case of disaster damage to the facility. Examples include hospitals, fire, police, and emergency service facilities, utility “lifeline” facilities such as water, electricity, gas supply, sewage disposal, and communications and transportation facilities.
dB: Decibel; a unit used to express the relative intensity of a sound as it is heard by the human ear. dBA: The “A-weighted” scale for measuring sound in decibels; weighs or reduces the effects of low and high frequencies in order to simulate human hearing. Every increase of 10dBA doubles the perceived loudness though the noise is actually ten times more intense.
Fault: A fracture in the earth’s crust forming a boundary between rock masses that have shifted.
Flood, 100-Year: The magnitude of a flood that has 1/100, or one percent chance of occurring in any given year.
Flood Hazard Area: Those areas subject to inundation by a 100-year flood, or subject to damage from shallow groundwater.
Geologic Hazards: Include the following:
Seismic hazard areas delineated on fault maps as subject to potential surface rupture, on soil maps indicating materials particularly prone to shaking or liquefaction, and in local and regional seismic safety plans;
Landslide hazard areas delineated on slope stability maps and in local and regional geologic or safety plans; and
Other geologic hazards such as expansive soils and subsidence areas.
Hazardous Material: Any substance that, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment if released into the workplace or the environment. The term includes, but is not limited to, hazardous substances and hazardous wastes. Examples include pesticides, herbicides, toxic metals and chemicals, liquefied natural gas, explosives, volatile chemicals, and nuclear fuels.
Ldn - Day-Night Average Sound Level. The A-weighted average sound level for a given area (measured in decibels) during a 24-hour period with a 10 dB weighting applied to night-time sound levels. The Ldn is approximately numerically equal to the CNEL for most environmental settings.
Levee: A bank constructed to control or confine flood waters.
Liquefaction: The transformation of loose water-saturated granular materials (such as sand or silt) from a solid into a liquid state. A type of ground failure that can occur during an earthquake.
Noise: Any sound that is undesirable because it interferes with speech and hearing, or is intense enough to damage hearing, or is otherwise annoying. Noise, simply, is "unwanted sound." Noise Attenuation: Reduction of the level of a noise source using a substance, material, or surface, such as earth berms and/or solid concrete walls.
Seismic: Caused by or subject to earthquakes or earth vibrations.
Subsidence: The gradual local settling or sinking of the earth’s surface with little or no horizontal motion (subsidence is usually the result of gas, oil, or water extraction, hydrocompaction, or peat oxidation, and not the result of a landslide or slope failure).
Wildland Fire: A fire occurring in a suburban or rural area which contains uncultivated lands, timber, range, watershed, brush, or grasslands. This includes areas where there is mingling of developed and undeveloped lands.
Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-3 October 2000
Policy HS-A.2 The County shall, within its authority and to the best of its ability, ensure that emergency dispatch centers, emergency operations centers, communications systems, vital utilities, and other essential public facilities necessary for the continuity of government are designed in a manner that will allow them to remain operational during and following an earthquake or other disaster.
Policy HS-A.3 The County shall ensure that the siting of critical emergency response facilities such as hospitals, fire stations, sheriffs’ offices and substations, dispatch centers, emergency operations centers, and other emergency service facilities and utilities are sited and designed to minimize their exposure and susceptibility to flooding, seismic and geological effects, fire, avalanche, and explosions as required by State regulations. Exception to this policy shall be allowed on the condition that the only alternative location would be so distant as to jeopardize the safety of the community, given that precautions are taken to protect the facility.
Policy HS-A.4 The County shall continue to conduct programs to inform the general public of emergency preparedness and disaster response procedures.
Implementation Programs
Program HS-A.A The County shall maintain agreements with other local, State, and Federal agencies to provide coordinated disaster response.
Responsibility: Sheriff’s Office
County Administrative Officer
Public Works Department
County Fire District
County Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program HS-A.B The County shall continue to monitor and periodically evaluate County emergency planning, operations, and training capabilities. (See Policy HSA.1) Responsibility: County Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program HS-A.C The County shall continue to periodically evaluate County-owned safety and emergency management facilities and public utility systems for susceptibility to damage due to flood inundation or seismic or geologic hazards and implement corrective actions should problems be identified. (See Policies HS-A.2 and HS-A.3)
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Planning & Resource Management Department
County Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program HS-A.D The County shall continue to conduct programs to inform the general public of emergency preparedness and disaster response procedures. (See Policy HS-A.4)
Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-4 Fresno County General Plan
Responsibility: County Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
B. FIRE HAZARDS
Structural and wildland fire hazards can threaten life and property in Fresno County. Wildland fires resulting from either natural or manmade causes occur in forests, brush, grasslands, fallow agricultural areas, and vacant lots. Such fires are capable of causing widespread damage to Fresno County’s valuable range and forest lands, in addition to threatening the lives and personal property of persons residing in wildfire-prone areas. Wildfires can also exacerbate air quality problems, particularly during the summer months when ambient air quality is already low.
Structural fires generally result from manmade causes and can easily spread through denselysettled urban areas, causing large-scale loss of personal property, personal injury, and, occasionally, fatalities.
Policies in this section are designed to ensure that new development is constructed to minimize potential fire hazards, minimize the risk of fire in already developed areas, and to provide public education concerning fire prevention. Related policies are included in Section PF-H, Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services.
Goal HS-B To minimize the risk of loss of life, injury, and damage to property and natural resources resulting from fire hazards.
Policies
Policy HS-B.1 The County shall review project proposals to identify potential fire hazards and to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive measures to reduce the risk to life and property.
Policy HS-B.2 The County shall ensure that development in high fire hazard areas is designed and constructed in a manner that minimizes the risk from fire hazards and meets all applicable State and County fire standards. Special consideration shall be given to the use of fire-resistant construction in the underside of eaves, balconies, unenclosed roofs and floors, and other similar horizontal surfaces in areas of steep slopes.
Policy HS-B.3 The County shall require that development in high fire hazard areas have fireresistant vegetation, cleared fire breaks separating communities or clusters of structures from native vegetation, or a long-term comprehensive vegetation and fuel management program. Fire hazard reduction measures shall be incorporated into the design of development projects in fire hazard areas.
Policy HS-B.4 The County shall require that foothill and mountain subdivisions of more than four (4) parcels provide for safe and ready access for fire and other emergency equipment, for routes of escape that will safely handle evacuations, and for roads and streets designed to be compatible with topography while meeting fire safety needs.
Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-5 October 2000
Policy HS-B.5 The County shall require development to have adequate access for fire and emergency vehicles and equipment. All major subdivisions shall have a minimum of two (2) points of ingress and egress.
Policy HS-B.6 The County shall work with local fire protection agencies, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and the U.S. Forest Service to promote the maintenance of existing fuel breaks and emergency access routes for effective fire suppression and in managing wildland fire hazards.
Policy HS-B.7 The County shall require that community fire breaks be coordinated with overall fire break plans developed by the foothill and mountain fire agencies.
Firebreak easements in subdivisions of more than four parcels or in built-up areas shall include access for firefighting personnel and motorized equipment. Easements shall be dedicated for this purpose.
Policy HS-B.8 The County shall refer development proposals in the unincorporated county to the appropriate local fire agencies for review of compliance with fire safety standards. If dual responsibility exists, both agencies shall review and comment relative to their area of responsibility. If standards are different or conflicting, the more stringent standards shall apply.
Policy HS-B.9 The County shall require that provisions for establishing year-round fire protection in foothill and mountain areas are developed where concentrations of population are such that structural fire protection is needed.
Policy HS-B.10 The County shall ensure that existing and new buildings of public assembly incorporate adequate fire protection measures to reduce potential loss of life and property in accordance with State and local codes and ordinances.
Policy HS-B.11 The County shall require new development to have water systems that meet County fire flow requirements. Where minimum fire flow is not available to meet County standards, alternate fire protection measures, including sprinkler systems, shall be identified and may be incorporated into development if approved by the appropriate fire protection agency.
Policy HS-B.12 The County shall promote installation and maintenance of smoke detectors in existing residences and commercial facilities that were constructed prior to the requirement for their installation.
Policy HS-B.13 The County shall work with local fire agencies to develop high-visibility fire prevention programs, including education programs and voluntary home inspections.
Implementation Programs
Program HS-B.A The County shall review the design of all buildings and structures to ensure they are designed and constructed to State and local regulations and standards as part of the building permit plan check process. (See Policy HSB.2) Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-6 Fresno County General Plan
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Time Frame: Ongoing
C. FLOOD HAZARDS
Flooding is a natural occurrence in the Central Valley because it is the drainage basin for thousands of watershed acres of Sierra Nevada and Coast Range foothills and mountains.
Flooding in Fresno County occurs primarily along the Kings River in the central-eastern portion of the county, some sections of the San Joaquin River, and many of the foothill streams along the east and west sides of the valley. A variety of mechanisms are currently employed to reduce flood damage in flood prone areas, including flood control reservoirs, levee systems, and watershed treatment.
Policies in this section are designed to minimize flood hazards by restricting development in flood prone areas, requiring development that does occur in floodplains to be designed to avoid flood damage, and through public education about flood hazards. Related policies are included in Section PF-E, Storm Drainage and Flood Control, and Section LU-C, River Influence Areas.
Goal HS-C To minimize the risk of loss of life, injury, and damage resulting from flood hazards.
Policies
Policy HS-C.1 The County shall encourage the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District to control stormwater flows originating in the streams of the Fresno County Stream Group, generally located east and north of the Fresno-Clovis urban area, by dams or other storage means prior to entering the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan area.
Policy HS-C.2 The County shall require that the design and location of dams and levees be in accordance with applicable design standards and specifications and accepted design and construction practices.
Policy HS-C.3 The County shall promote a floodplain management approach in flood hazard areas that are presently undeveloped by giving priority to regulation of land uses over development of structural controls as a method of reducing flood damage.
Policy HS-C.4 The County shall encourage the performance of appropriate investigations to determine the 100-year water surface elevations for the San Joaquin River, taking into account recent storm events and existing channel conditions, to identify the potential extent and risk of flooding. New development, including public infrastructure projects, shall not be allowed along the river until the risk of flooding at the site has been determined and appropriate flood risk reduction measures identified.
Policy HS-C.5 Where existing development is located in a flood hazard area, the County shall require that construction of flood control facilities proceed only after a complete review of the environmental effects and a project cost/benefit analysis.
Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-7 October 2000
Policy HS-C.6 The County shall promote flood control measures that maintain natural conditions within the 100-year floodplain of rivers and streams and, to the extent possible, combine flood control, recreation, water quality, and open space functions. Existing irrigation canals shall be used to the extent possible to remove excess stormwater. Retention-recharge basins should be located to best utilize natural drainage patterns.
Policy HS-C.7 The County shall continue to participate in the Federal Flood Insurance Program by ensuring compliance with applicable requirements.
Policy HS-C.8 During the building permit review process, the County shall ensure project compliance with applicable Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) standards pertaining to residential and non-residential development in the floodplain, floodway, or floodway fringe.
Policy HS-C.9 The County shall prohibit the construction of essential facilities in the 100- year floodplain, unless it can be demonstrated that the facility can be safely operated and accessed during flood events.
Policy HS-C.10 The County shall require that all placement of structures and/or floodproofing be done in a manner that will not cause floodwaters to be diverted onto adjacent property, increase flood hazards to other property, or otherwise adversely affect other property.
Policy HS-C.11 The County shall encourage open space uses in all flood hazard areas. Land Conservation contracts and open space and scenic easements should be made available to property owners.
Policy HS-C.12 The County shall consider dam failure inundation maps of all reservoirs in making land use and related decisions.
Policy HS-C.13 The County shall continue public awareness programs to inform the general public and potentially affected property owners of flood hazards and potential dam failure inundation.
Implementation Programs
Program HS-C.A The County shall continue to participate in the Federal Flood Insurance Program. The County shall maintain flood hazard maps and other relevant floodplain data and shall revise or update this information as new information becomes available. In the County’s review of applications for building permits and discretionary permits and proposals for capital improvement projects, the County shall determine whether the proposed project is within the 100-year floodplain based on these maps. (See Policy HS-C.7) Responsibility: Public Works Department
Planning & Resource Management Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-8 Fresno County General Plan
Program HS-C.B The County shall continue to implement and enforce its Floodplain Management Ordinance. (See Policy HS-C.8)
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Planning & Resource Management Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program HS-C.C The County shall continue to develop and review relevant dam failure evacuation plans and continue to provide public information on dam failure preparedness. (See Policy HS-C.13)
Responsibility: Public Works Department
County Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
D. SEISMIC AND GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS
There are a number of active and potentially-active faults within and adjacent to Fresno County.
Although most of Fresno County is situated within an area of relatively low seismic activity by comparison to other areas of the state, the faults and fault systems that lie along the eastern and western boundaries of the county, as well as other regional faults, have the potential to produce high-magnitude earthquakes throughout the county. The principle earthquake hazard is groundshaking. Older buildings constructed before building codes were established and newer buildings constructed before earthquake-resistant provisions were included in the building codes are the most likely to be damaged during an earthquake. Other geologic hazards in Fresno County include landslides, subsidence, expansive soils and erosion, and volcanic hazards.
Policies in this section seek to ensure that new buildings and facilities are designed to withstand seismic and geologic hazards.
Goal HS-D To minimize the loss of life, injury, and property damage due to seismic and geologic hazards.
Policies
Policy HS-D.1 The County shall continue to support scientific geologic investigations that refine, enlarge, and improve the body of knowledge on active fault zones, unstable areas, severe groundshaking, avalanche potential, and other hazardous geologic conditions in Fresno County.
Policy HS-D.2 The County shall ensure that the General Plan and/or County Ordinance Code is revised, as necessary, to incorporate geologic hazard areas formally designated by the State Geologist (e.g., Earthquake Fault Zones and Seismic Hazard Zones). Development in such areas, including public infrastructure projects, shall not be allowed until compliance with the investigation and mitigation requirements established by the State Geologist can be demonstrated.
Policy HS-D.3 The County shall require that a soils engineering and geologic-seismic analysis be prepared by a California-registered engineer or engineering geologist prior to permitting development, including public infrastructure Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-9 October 2000
projects, in areas prone to geologic or seismic hazards (i.e., fault rupture, groundshaking, lateral spreading, lurchcracking, fault creep, liquefaction, subsidence, settlement, landslides, mudslides, unstable slopes, or avalanche).
Policy HS-D.4 The County shall require all proposed structures, additions to structures, utilities, or public facilities situated within areas subject to geologic-seismic hazards as identified in the soils engineering and geologic-seismic analysis to be sited, designed, and constructed in accordance with applicable provisions of the Uniform Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) and other relevant professional standards to minimize or prevent damage or loss and to minimize the risk to public safety.
Policy HS-D.5 Pursuant to the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (Public Resources Code, Chapter 7.5), the County shall not permit any structure for human occupancy to be placed within designated Earthquake Fault Zones unless the specific provisions of the Act and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations have been satisfied.
Policy HS-D.6 The County shall inventory unreinforced masonry structures, including emergency facilities and other critical facilities constructed prior to 1948, used for human occupancy (excluding single-family residential structures), and evaluate the facilities for seismic safety. If found below acceptable standards, the County shall implement a program to mitigate potential hazards.
Policy HS-D.7 The County shall ensure compliance with State seismic and building standards in the evaluation, design, and siting of critical facilities, including police and fire stations, school facilities, hospitals, hazardous material manufacture and storage facilities, bridges, large public assembly halls, and other structures subject to special seismic safety design requirements.
Policy HS-D.8 The County shall require a soils report by a California-registered engineer or engineering geologist for any proposed development, including public infrastructure projects, that requires a County permit and is located in an area containing soils with high “expansive” or “shrink-swell” properties.
Development in such areas shall be prohibited unless suitable design and construction measures are incorporated to reduce the potential risks associated with these conditions.
Policy HS-D.9 The County shall seek to minimize soil erosion by maintaining compatible land uses, suitable building designs, and appropriate construction techniques. Contour grading, where feasible, and revegetation shall be required to mitigate the appearance of engineered slopes and to control erosion.
Policy HS-D.10 The County shall require the preparation of drainage plans for development or public infrastructure projects in hillside areas to direct runoff and drainage away from unstable slopes.
Policy HS-D.11 The County shall not approve a County permit for new development, including public infrastructure projects where slopes are over thirty (30) percent unless it can be demonstrated by a California-registered civil Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-10 Fresno County General Plan
engineer or engineering geologist that hazards to public safety will be reduced to acceptable levels.
Policy HS-D.12 In known or potential landslide hazard areas, the County shall prohibit avoidable alteration of land in a manner that could increase the hazard, including concentration of water through drainage, irrigation, or septic systems, undercutting the bases of slopes, removal of vegetative cover, and steepening of slopes.
Policy HS-D.13 The County shall not approve a County permit for new development, including public infrastructure projects, in known or potential avalanche hazard areas unless it can be demonstrated by a California-registered engineer or engineering geologist that the structures will be safe under anticipated snow loads and avalanche conditions.
Policy HS-D.14 Whenever zoning is employed to restrict the use of land subject to severe geologic hazards (e.g., landslides), the County shall designate parcels so restricted for open space uses.
Policy HS-D.15 The County Board of Review or other subsequently-appointed body shall serve as the review body on appeals from seismic and geologic hazard requirements.
Implementation Programs
Program HS-D.A The County shall regularly review readily available information published by the California Division of Mines and Geology and other agencies and use the information to update County maps and the General Plan Background Report. (See Policies HS-D.1 and HS-D.2)
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Public Works Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program HS-D.B The County shall inventory unreinforced masonry structures, including emergency facilities and other critical facilities constructed prior to 1948, used for human occupancy (excluding single-family residential structures), and evaluate the facilities for seismic safety. If found below acceptable standards, the County shall implement a program to mitigate potential hazards.
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Public Works Department
Time Frame: FY 02-03; 03-04
Program HS-D.C The County shall develop a public awareness program to aid in the identification and mitigation of unreinforced masonry structures. (See Policy HS-D.6)
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Time Frame: FY 02-03
Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-11 October 2000
E. AIRPORT HAZARDS
Airport safety hazards include hazards posed to aircraft and hazards posed by aircraft to people and property on the ground. With proper land use planning, aircraft safety risks can be reduced, primarily by avoiding incompatible land uses.
Policies in this section are designed to minimize public exposure to risks associated with airport operations and to minimize the siting of land uses near airports that might interfere with airport operations. Related policies are included in Section HS-F, Hazardous Materials, and Section HS-G, Noise.
Goal HS-E To minimize the exposure of the public to high noise levels and safety hazards through land use controls and policies for property in the vicinity of airports; and to limit urban encroachment around airports in order to preserve the safety of flight operations and the continued viability of airport facilities.
Policies
Policy HS-E.1 The County shall review the Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission’s Airport Land Use Policy Plans (CLUPPs) to determine the appropriate land uses around airports. The County shall limit land uses in airport safety zones to those uses listed in the applicable CLUPPs as compatible uses.
Exceptions shall be made only as provided for in the CLUPPs. Such uses shall also be regulated to ensure compatibility in terms of location, height, and noise.
Policy HS-E.2 The County shall ensure that new development, including public infrastructure projects, does not create safety hazards such as glare from direct or reflective sources, smoke, electrical interference, hazardous chemicals, or fuel storage in violation of adopted safety standards.
Policy HS-E.3 The County shall ensure that development, including public infrastructure projects, within the airport approach and departure zones complies with Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Administration Regulations (Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace).
Implementation Programs
Program HS-E.A The County shall refer to the Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission for review projects within the Airport Review Area requiring amendments of general, community and specific plans, airport master plans, rezoning applications, zoning ordinance text amendments, and building code amendments for consistency with the appropriate Airport Land Use Policy Plan.
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission
Time Frame: Ongoing
Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-12 Fresno County General Plan
F. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Hazardous waste handlers and generators in Fresno County include industries, businesses, public and private institutions, and households. The transport, storage, use, and disposal of toxic or hazardous materials poses potential safety hazards in the event of unintentional exposure, leak, fire, or accident.
Policies in this section are designed to ensure that development projects minimize public risks associated with both intended and unintended exposure to hazardous materials and wastes.
Related policies are included in Section HS-A, Emergency Management and Response.
Goal HS-F To minimize the risk of loss of life, injury, serious illness, and damage to property resulting from the use, transport, treatment, and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes.
Policies
Policy HS-F.1 The County shall require that facilities that handle hazardous materials or hazardous wastes be designed, constructed, and operated in accordance with applicable hazardous materials and waste management laws and regulations.
Policy HS-F.2 The County shall require that applications for discretionary development projects that will use hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste in large quantities include detailed information concerning hazardous waste reduction, recycling, and storage.
Policy HS-F.3 The County, through its Hazardous Materials Incident Response Plan, shall coordinate and cooperate with emergency response agencies to ensure adequate countywide response to hazardous materials incidents.
Policy HS-F.4 For redevelopment or infill projects or where past site uses suggest environmental impairment, the County shall require that an investigation be performed to identify the potential for soil or groundwater contamination. In the event soil or groundwater contamination is identified or could be encountered during site development, the County shall require a plan that identifies potential risks and actions to mitigate those risks prior to, during, and after construction.
Policy HS-F.5 The County shall require that demolition of structures where friable asbestos or other hazardous materials could be released into the environment comply with applicable regulations and standards.
Policy HS-F.6 The County shall work cooperatively with the State Department of Toxic Substances Control and Regional Water Quality Control Board to promote the timely and efficient cleanup of contaminated sites under the regulatory oversight of these agencies.
Policy HS-F.7 The County shall ensure that the mining and processing of minerals in the County is conducted in compliance with applicable environmental protection standards.
Policy HS-F.8 The County shall encourage and promote household hazardous waste information and collection programs.
Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-13 October 2000
Implementation Programs
Program HS-F.A The County shall review discretionary uses which involve use of hazardous materials or generate hazardous wastes in regulated quantities. (See Policy HS-F.2)
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Department of Community Health
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program HS-F.B The County shall investigate funding alternatives for site acquisition, development, and operation for a permanent household waste facility.
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Time Frame: FY 01-02
Program HS-F.C The County shall review the plans to mitigate soil or groundwater contamination for redevelopment or infill projects. (See Policy HS-F.4) Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Department of Community Health
Time Frame: Ongoing
G. NOISE
Noise is subjectively defined as unwanted sound. Noise can result from many sources, including traffic on freeways and other roads, railroad operations, aircraft, and industrial activities. Exposure to excessive noise is often cited as a health problem, primarily in terms of its contribution to undue stress and annoyance. The Background Report includes an analysis of major noise sources in the county and noise contours along major traffic corridors.
Policies in this section set noise standards and seek to protect noise-sensitive uses from excessive noise either through noise-reducing project design features or by allowing noisesensitive land uses to only locate in areas with ambient noise levels below specific thresholds.
Related policies are included in Section LU-D, Westside Freeway Corridor, and Section LU-F, Urban Development Patterns.
Goal HS-G To protect residential and other noise-sensitive uses from exposure to harmful or annoying noise levels; to identify maximum acceptable noise levels compatible with various land use designations; and to develop a policy framework necessary to achieve and maintain a healthful noise environment.
Policies
Policy HS-G.1 The County shall require that all proposed development incorporate design elements necessary to minimize adverse noise impacts on surrounding land uses.
Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-14 Fresno County General Plan
Policy HS-G.2 The County shall require new roadway improvement projects to achieve and maintain the normally acceptable noise levels shown in Chart HS-1: “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments.”
Policy HS-G.3 The County shall allow the development of new noise-sensitive land uses (which include, but are not limited to, residential neighborhoods, schools, and hospitals) only in areas where existing or projected noise levels are “acceptable” according to the Chart HS-1: “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments.” Noise mitigation measures may be required to reduce noise in outdoor activity areas and interior spaces to these levels.
Policy HS-G.4 So that noise mitigation may be considered in the design of new projects, the County shall require an acoustical analysis as part of the environmental review process where:
a. Noise sensitive land uses are proposed in areas exposed to existing or projected noise levels that are “generally unacceptable” or higher according to the Chart HS-1: “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments;”
b. Proposed projects are likely to produce noise levels exceeding the levels shown in the County’s Noise Control Ordinance at existing or planned noise-sensitive uses.
Policy HS-G.5 Where noise mitigation measures are required to achieve acceptable levels according to land use compatibility or the Noise Control Ordinance, the County shall place emphasis of such measures upon site planning and project design. These measures may include, but are not limited to, building orientation, setbacks, earthen berms, and building construction practices.
The County shall consider the use of noise barriers, such as soundwalls, as a means of achieving the noise standards after other design-related noise mitigation measures have been evaluated or integrated into the project.
Policy HS-G.6 The County shall regulate construction-related noise to reduce impacts on adjacent uses in accordance with the County's Noise Control Ordinance.
Policy HS-G.7 Where existing noise-sensitive uses may be exposed to increased noise levels due to roadway improvement projects, the County shall apply the following criteria to determine the significance of the impact:
a. Where existing noise levels are less than 60 dBLdn at outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses, a 5 dBLdn increase in noise levels will be considered significant;
b. Where existing noise levels are between 60 and 65 dBLdn at outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses, a 3 dBLdn increase in noise levels will be considered significant; and
c. Where existing noise levels are greater than 65 dBLdn at outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses, a 1.5 dBLdn increase in noise levels will be considered significant.
Policy Document Health and Safety Element
Fresno County General Plan 6-15 October 2000
Policy HS-G.8 The County shall evaluate the compatibility of proposed projects with existing and future noise levels through a comparison to Chart HS-1, “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments.”
Policy HS-G.9 The County shall not allow the development of new residential land uses in areas exposed to existing or projected levels of noise from aircraft operations at any airport or air base which exceed 60 dBLdn or CNEL.
Implementation Programs
Program HS-G.A The County shall amend and enforce the Fresno County Noise Ordinance as necessary consistent with the policies and standards within this element. (See Policies HS-G.1 through HS-G.9)
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Department of Community Health
Time Frame: FY 01-02
Program HS-G.B The County shall develop an effective noise control program that includes:
a. An ordinance (1) defining acceptable noise levels based on land use, (2) setting forth monitoring methodology and determination of violations, (3) defining exemptions and variance procedures, and (4) delineating enforcement and abatement procedures; and
b. A public information program to inform county residents of the impact of noise on their lives.
Responsibility: Planning & Resource Management Department Department of Community Health
Time Frame: FY 01-02
Health and Safety Element Policy Document
October 2000 6-16 Fresno County General Plan
County of Fresno Code of Ordinances
Chapter 8.40 - NOISE CONTROL
Sections:
8.40.010 - Purposes.
The board of supervisors declares and finds that excessive noise levels are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety and contrary to the public interest as follows:
A. By interfering with sleep, communication, relaxation and the full use of one's property; B. By contributing to hearing impairment and a wide range of adverse physiological and psychological stress conditions; and
C. By adversely affecting the value of real property.
It is the intent of this chapter to protect persons from excessive levels of noise within or near a residence, school, church, hospital or public library and to warn persons of the hazards of excessive noise in places of public entertainment.
(Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.020 - Definitions.
The following words, phrases and terms as used in this chapter shall have the following meanings:
A. "Agricultural property" means land used for or devoted to the production of crops and livestock.
B. "Ambient noise level" means the composite of noise from all sources excluding the alleged offensive noise. In this context it represents the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location for a specified time of the day or night.
C. "'A' weighted sound level" means the sound level in decibels as measured with a sound level meter using the "A" weighted network (scale) at slow meter response. The unit of measurement is referred to herein as dB(A) or dBA.
D. "Construction" means construction, erection, enlargement, alteration, conversion or movement of any building, structures or land together with any scientific surveys associated therewith.
E. "Cumulative period" means an additive period of time composed of individual time segments which may be continuous or interrupted.
F. "Decibel" means a unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to twenty times the logarithm to the base ten of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is twenty micropascals.
G. "Emergency work" means the use of any machinery, equipment, vehicle, manpower or other activity in a short term effort to protect, or restore safe conditions in the community, or work by private or public utilities when restoring utility service.
H. "Fixed noise source" means a device or a machine which creates sounds while fixed or stationary, including but not limited to residential, agricultural, industrial and commercial machinery and equipment, pumps, fans, compressors, air conditioners and refrigeration equipment.
I. "Health officer" means the health officer of the county or his duly authorized deputy.
J. "Hospital" means any building or portion thereof used for the accommodation and medical care of the sick, injured or infirm persons and includes rest homes and nursing homes.
K. "Impulsive noise" means a noise of short duration, usually less than one second, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay.
L. "Intruding noise level" means the sound level created, caused, maintained or originating from an alleged offensive source, measured in decibels, at a specified location while the alleged offensive source is in operation.
M. "Mobile noise source" means any noise source other than a fixed noise source.
N. "Noise disturbance" means any sound which violates the quantitative standards set forth in this chapter.
O. "Residential property" means a parcel of real property which is developed and used either in whole or in part for residential purposes.
P. "School" means public or private institutions conducting regular academic instruction at preschool, kindergarten, elementary, secondary or collegiate levels.
Q. "Simple tone noise" means any noise which is distinctly audible as a single pitch (frequency) or set of pitches as determined by the health officer.
R. "Sound level meter" means an instrument meeting American National Standard Institute's Standard S1.4-1971 for Type l or Type 2 sound level meters or an instrument and the associated recording and analyzing equipment which will provide equivalent data. (Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.030 - Noise measurement criteria.
Any noise measurement made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be made with a sound level meter using the "A" weighted network (scale) at slow meter response. Fast meter response shall be used for impulsive type sounds. Calibration of a measurement equipment utilizing an acoustic calibrator shall be performed immediately prior to recording any noise data.
The exterior noise levels shall be measured within fifty feet of the affected residence, school, hospital, church or public library. Where practical, the microphone shall be positioned tree to five feet above the ground and away from reflective surfaces.
The interior noise levels shall be measured within the affected dwelling unit, at points at least four feet from the wall, ceiling or floor nearest the noise source, with windows in the normal seasonal configuration. The reported interior noise level shall be determined by taking the arithmetic average of the readings taken at the various microphone locations.
(Ord. 78-602, § 1)
8.40.040 - Exterior noise standards.
A. It is unlawful for any person, including an owner, whether through the owner or the owner's agent, lessee, sublessor, sublessee or occupant, at any location within the unincorporated area of the county, to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise, on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person which causes the exterior noise level when measured at any affected single- or multiple-family residence, school, hospital, church or public library situation in either the incorporated or unincorporated area to exceed the noise level standards as set forth in the following table:
Category
Cumulative Number of minutes in any onehour time period Noise Level Standards, dBA
Daytime 7 a.m. to 10
p.m.
Nighttime 10 p.m. to 7
a.m.
1 30 50 45
2 15 55 50
3 5 60 55
4 1 65 60
5 0 70 65
B. In the event the measured ambient noise level exceeds the applicable noise level standard in any category above, the applicable standard shall be adjusted so as to equal the ambient noise level.
C. Each of the noise level standards specified above shall be reduced by five dB(A) for simple tone noises, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or for recurring impulsive noises.
D. If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be measured, the noise level measured while the source is in operation shall be compared directly to the noise level standards. (Ord. 01-013, § 1; Ord. 78-602, §)
8.40.050 - Interior noise standards.
A. It is unlawful for any person, at any location within the unincorporated are of the county to operate or cause to be operated within a dwelling unit, any source of sound or to allow the creation of any noise which causes the noise level when measured inside a receiving dwelling unit situated in either the incorporated or unincorporated are to exceed the noise level standards as set forth in the following table:
Category
Cumulative Number of minutes in any onehour time period Noise Level Standards, dBA
Daytime 7 a.m. to 10
p.m.
Nighttime 10 p.m. to 7
a.m.
1 5 45 35
2 1 50 40
3 0 55 45
B. In the event the measured ambient noise level exceeds the applicable noise level standard in any category above, the applicable standard shall be adjusted so as to equal the ambient noise level.
C. Each of the noise level standards specified above shall be reduced by five dB(A) for simple tone noises, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or for recurring impulse noises.
D. If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be measured, the noise level measured while the source is in operation shall be compared directly to the noise level standards. (Ord. 01-013, § 2; Ord. 78-602, § 1)
8.40.060 - Noise source exemptions.
The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this chapter:
A. Activities conducted in public parks, public playgrounds, and public or private school grounds, including but not limited to school athletic and school entertainment events; B. Any mechanical device, apparatus or equipment used, related to or connected with emergency activities or emergency work;
C. Noise sources associated with construction, provided such activities do not take place before six a.m. or after nine p.m. on any day except Saturday or Sunday, or before seven a.m. or after five p.m. on Saturday or Sunday;
D. Noise sources associated with the maintenance of residential property provided such activities take place between the hours of six a.m. and nine p.m. on any day except Saturday or Sunday, or between the hours of seven a.m. and nine p.m. on Saturday or Sunday; E. Noise sources associated with agricultural activities on agricultural property; F. Noise sources associated with a lawful commercial or industrial activity caused by mechanical devices or equipment, including air conditioning or refrigeration systems, installed prior to the effective date of this chapter; that this exemption shall expire on July 1, 1980; G. Noise sources associated with work performed by private or public utilities in the maintenance or modification of its facilities;
H. Noise sources associate with the drilling or redrilling of petroleum, gas, injection or water wells; I. Noise sources associated with the collection of waste or garbage from property devoted to commercial or industrial uses;
J. Any activity to the extent regulation thereof has been preempted by state or federal law. (Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.070 - Air conditioning and refrigeration.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.40.040 where the intruding noise source when measured as provided in Section 8.40.030 is an air conditioning or refrigeration system or associated equipment installed prior to July 1, 1980, the exterior noise level shall not exceed fifty-five dBA, except where such equipment is exempt from the provisions of this chapter. The exterior noise level shall not exceed fifty dBA for such equipment installed or in use after July 1, 1980. (Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.080 - Waste and garbage collection equipment.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.40.040, noise sources associated with the collection of waste or garbage from residential property by persons authorized to engage in such activity, and who are operating truck-mounted loading or compacting equipment, shall not take place before six a.m. or after seven p.m., and the noise level created by such activities when measured at a distance of fifty feet in an open area shall not exceed the following standards:
1. Eighty-five dBA for equipment in use, purchased or leased within six months from the effective date of this chapter;
2. Eighty dBA for that equipment set forth in subsection D (1) above after five years from the effective date of this chapter.
3. Eighty dBA for new equipment purchased or lease after six months from the effective date of this chapter.
4. Seventy-five dBA for new equipment purchased or leased after thirty-six months from the effective date of this chapter.
(Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.090 - Electrical substations.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.40.040, noise sources associated with the operation of electrical substations shall not exceed fifty dBA when measured as provided in Section 8.40.030. (Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.100 - Warning signs in places of public entertainment.
It is unlawful for any person to operate or permit the operation or playing of any loudspeaker, musical instrument, motorized racing vehicle, or other source of sound for public entertainment within a building or structure wherein the noise level exceeds ninety-five dBA as read on the slow response of a sound level meter at any point normally occupied by a customer, without a conspicuous and legible sign stating:
"WARNING! SOUND LEVELS WITHIN MAY CAUSE HEARING IMPAIRMENT." (Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.110 - Variances.
A. The owner or operator of a noise source which the health officer has determined violates any of the provisions of this chapter may file an application with the health officer for variance from strict compliance with any particular provisions of this chapter were such variance will not result in a hazardous condition or a nuisance and strict compliance would be unreasonable in view of all the circumstances. The owner or operator shall set forth all actions taken to comply with such provisions,
and the reasons why immediate compliance cannot be achieved. A separate application shall be filed for each noise source; provided, however, that several mobile sources under common ownership or fixed sources under common ownership on a single property may be combined into one application.
B. Upon receipt of the application and within thirty days, the health officer shall either (1) approve such request in whole or in part, (2) deny the request, or (3) refer the request directly to the board of review for action thereon in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. In the event the variance is approved, reasonable conditions may be imposed which may include restrictions on noise level, noise duration and operating hours, an approved method of achieving compliance and a time schedule for its implementation. The decision of the health officer is subject to appeal to the board of review for a hearing de novo by filing a written appeal with the health officer not later than fifteen days following the mailing of the health officer's decision to the applicant.
C. Factors which the health officer or the reviewing body must consider shall include but not be limited to the following:
1. Uses of property within the area affected by the noise;
2. Factors related to initiating and completing all remedial work;
3. Age and useful life of the existing noise source;
4. The general public interest, welfare and safety.
D. The board of review may grant variances from provisions of this chapter subject to such terms, conditions and requirements and may be deemed reasonable to achieve compliance with the provisions of this chapter. The health officer or his duly appointed representative shall act as secretary of the board of review during its consideration of a variance from the provisions of this chapter.
E. Within fifteen days following the decision of the board of review on an application for a variance, the applicant may appeal the decision to the board of supervisors for a hearing de novo by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of the board of supervisors. The board of supervisors shall either affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the board of review. Such decision shall be final and shall be based upon the considerations set forth in this section.
(Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
8.40.120 - Violation—Enforcement.
The violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall be an infraction punishable as provided in Section 1.12.020 of this code. The provisions of this chapter may also enforced an injunction issued out of the superior court upon suit of the county. Any violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to be a public nuisance.
The county health officer shall enforce the provisions of this chapter. Right of entry for inspection shall be as provided Section 1.08.010 of this code.
(Ord. 602, § 1, 1978)
24-hr Ldn CNEL
INPUT INPUT INPUT CALCS CALCS
Time D/E/N Day 1, 1-h Leq Day 2, 1-h Leq AVG Lvl Penalty Adj'd SPL Penalty Adj'd SPL 17:00:00 D 59.1 0 59.1 0 59.1 0 59.1
18:00:00 D 57 0 57.0 0 57.0 0 57.0
19:00:00 E 58.1 0 58.1 0 58.1 5 63.1
20:00:00 E 58.6 0 58.6 0 58.6 5 63.6
21:00:00 E 62.3 0 62.3 0 62.3 5 67.3
22:00:00 N 53.4 0 53.4 10 63.4 10 63.4
23:00:00 N 52.8 0 52.8 10 62.8 10 62.8
0:00:00 N 55.3 0 55.3 10 65.3 10 65.3
1:00:00 N 58.2 0 58.2 10 68.2 10 68.2
2:00:00 N 50.3 0 50.3 10 60.3 10 60.3
3:00:00 N 49.8 0 49.8 10 59.8 10 59.8
4:00:00 N 53.1 0 53.1 10 63.1 10 63.1
5:00:00 N 53.4 0 53.4 10 63.4 10 63.4
6:00:00 N 55.4 0 55.4 10 65.4 10 65.4
7:00:00 D 56.8 0 56.8 0 56.8 0 56.8
8:00:00 D 57.6 0 57.6 0 57.6 0 57.6
9:00:00 D 54.2 0 54.2 0 54.2 0 54.2
10:00:00 D 55 0 55.0 0 55.0 0 55.0
11:00:00 D 56.3 0 56.3 0 56.3 0 56.3
12:00:00 D 62.9 0 62.9 0 62.9 0 62.9
13:00:00 D 63.3 0 63.3 0 63.3 0 63.3
14:00:00 D 57.4 0 57.4 0 57.4 0 57.4
15:00:00 D 62.9 0 62.9 0 62.9 0 62.9
16:00:00 D 57.4 0 57.4 0 57.4 0 57.4
24h Leq Ldn CNEL
58.2 61.9 62.6
Noise Metrics Calculations
25 30
35 40
45 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 16:04 17:04 18:04 19:04 20:04 21:04 22:04 23:04 0:04 1:04 2:04 3:04 4:04 5:04 6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:04 11:04 12:04 13:04 14:04 15:04 16:04 17:04 Noise Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location LT-1 Time History
Tuesday May 16- Wednesday May 17, 2016
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100
17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 Noise Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location LT-1 Interval
Tuesday May 16- Wednesday May 17, 2016
Leq
Lmax
Lmin
L2
L8
L25
L50
L90
L99
24-hr Ldn CNEL
INPUT INPUT INPUT CALCS CALCS
Time D/E/N Day 1, 1-h Leq Day 2, 1-h Leq AVG Lvl Penalty Adj'd SPL Penalty Adj'd SPL 16:00:00 D 52.2 0 52.2 0 52.2 0 52.2
17:00:00 D 60.2 0 60.2 0 60.2 0 60.2
18:00:00 D 54.8 0 54.8 0 54.8 0 54.8
19:00:00 E 53.5 0 53.5 0 53.5 5 58.5
20:00:00 E 54.4 0 54.4 0 54.4 5 59.4
21:00:00 E 50.5 0 50.5 0 50.5 5 55.5
22:00:00 N 48.9 0 48.9 10 58.9 10 58.9
23:00:00 N 47 0 47.0 10 57.0 10 57.0
0:00:00 N 46.8 0 46.8 10 56.8 10 56.8
1:00:00 N 45.8 0 45.8 10 55.8 10 55.8
2:00:00 N 45.7 0 45.7 10 55.7 10 55.7
3:00:00 N 47.3 0 47.3 10 57.3 10 57.3
4:00:00 N 48.8 0 48.8 10 58.8 10 58.8
5:00:00 N 55.7 0 55.7 10 65.7 10 65.7
6:00:00 N 52.8 0 52.8 10 62.8 10 62.8
7:00:00 D 53 0 53.0 0 53.0 0 53.0
8:00:00 D 53.5 0 53.5 0 53.5 0 53.5
9:00:00 D 52.4 0 52.4 0 52.4 0 52.4
10:00:00 D 54.5 0 54.5 0 54.5 0 54.5
11:00:00 D 52.7 0 52.7 0 52.7 0 52.7
12:00:00 D 50.7 0 50.7 0 50.7 0 50.7
13:00:00 D 55.3 0 55.3 0 55.3 0 55.3
14:00:00 D 51.6 0 51.6 0 51.6 0 51.6
15:00:00 D 54.1 0 54.1 0 54.1 0 54.1
24h Leq Ldn CNEL
53.2 57.5 57.9
Noise Metrics Calculations
25 30
35 40
45 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 16:04 17:04 18:04 19:04 20:04 21:04 22:04 23:04 0:04 1:04 2:04 3:04 4:04 5:04 6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:04 11:04 12:04 13:04 14:04 15:04 16:04 17:04 Noise Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location LT-2 Time History
Tuesday May 16- Wednesday May 17, 2016
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100
16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 Noise Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location LT-2 Interval
Tuesday May 16- Wednesday May 17, 2016
Leq
Lmax
Lmin
L2
L8
L25
L50
L90
L99
24-hr Ldn CNEL
INPUT INPUT INPUT CALCS CALCS
Time D/E/N Day 1, 1-h Leq Day 2, 1-h Leq AVG Lvl Penalty Adj'd SPL Penalty Adj'd SPL 16:00:00 D 50.9 0 50.9 0 50.9 0 50.9
17:00:00 D 48.1 0 48.1 0 48.1 0 48.1
18:00:00 D 52.1 0 52.1 0 52.1 0 52.1
19:00:00 E 49.8 0 49.8 0 49.8 5 54.8
20:00:00 E 46.8 0 46.8 0 46.8 5 51.8
21:00:00 E 49.6 0 49.6 0 49.6 5 54.6
22:00:00 N 44.3 0 44.3 10 54.3 10 54.3
23:00:00 N 46.2 0 46.2 10 56.2 10 56.2
0:00:00 N 47.2 0 47.2 10 57.2 10 57.2
1:00:00 N 43.3 0 43.3 10 53.3 10 53.3
2:00:00 N 43.7 0 43.7 10 53.7 10 53.7
3:00:00 N 43.4 0 43.4 10 53.4 10 53.4
4:00:00 N 50.8 0 50.8 10 60.8 10 60.8
5:00:00 N 53.4 0 53.4 10 63.4 10 63.4
6:00:00 N 54.4 0 54.4 10 64.4 10 64.4
7:00:00 D 56.3 0 56.3 0 56.3 0 56.3
8:00:00 D 54 0 54.0 0 54.0 0 54.0
9:00:00 D 54.2 0 54.2 0 54.2 0 54.2
10:00:00 D 55.2 0 55.2 0 55.2 0 55.2
11:00:00 D 58.8 0 58.8 0 58.8 0 58.8
12:00:00 D 51 0 51.0 0 51.0 0 51.0
13:00:00 D 53.5 0 53.5 0 53.5 0 53.5
14:00:00 D 53.7 0 53.7 0 53.7 0 53.7
15:00:00 D 51.2 0 51.2 0 51.2 0 51.2
24h Leq Ldn CNEL
52.4 56.7 56.9
LT-3 Noise Metrics Calculations
25 30
35 40
45 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 15:29 16:29 17:29 18:29 19:29 20:29 21:29 22:29 23:29 0:29 1:29 2:29 3:29 4:29 5:29 6:29 7:29 8:29 9:29 10:29 11:29 12:29 13:29 14:29 15:29 16:29 Noise Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location LT-3 Time History
Tuesday May 16- Wednesday May 17, 2016
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100
16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 Noise Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location LT-3 Interval
Tuesday May 16- Wednesday May 17, 2016
Leq
Lmax
Lmin
L2
L8
L25
L50
L90
L99
40 42
44 46
48 50
52 54
56 58
60 14:52 14:53 14:54 14:55 14:56 14:57 14:58 14:59 15:00 15:01 15:02 15:03 15:04 15:05 15:06 15:07 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-1
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-1 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 14:52:49 900 48.9 78.5 58.9 43.2 53.6 51.7 51.3 49.8 48.1 45.2 55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 12:21 12:22 12:23 12:24 12:25 12:26 12:27 12:28 12:29 12:30 12:31 12:32 12:33 12:34 12:35 12:36 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-2
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-2 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 12:21:43 900 60.1 89.7 70.9 54.8 64.9 62 61.8 60.6 59.3 57.1 45 47
49 51
53 55
57 59
61 63
65 13:35 13:36 13:37 13:38 13:39 13:40 13:41 13:42 13:43 13:44 13:45 13:46 13:47 13:48 13:49 13:50 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-3
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-3 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 13:35:21 900 56 85.6 69 43 64.6 62 61.1 55.3 49.4 45.2 55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 16:12 16:13 16:14 16:15 16:16 16:17 16:18 16:19 16:20 16:21 16:22 16:23 16:24 16:25 16:26 16:27 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-4
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-4 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 16:12:01 900 59.8 89.4 75.8 54.1 66.7 61.7 61.1 58.9 57.6 55.6 45 47
49 51
53 55
57 59
61 63
65 15:48 15:49 15:50 15:51 15:52 15:53 15:54 15:55 15:56 15:57 15:58 15:59 16:00 16:01 16:02 16:03 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-5
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-5 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 15:48:59 900 55.8 85.3 73 45.6 65.6 58.6 56.9 52.5 50.8 48.5 50 52
54 56
58 60
62 64
66 68
70 15:23 15:24 15:25 15:26 15:27 15:28 15:29 15:30 15:31 15:32 15:33 15:34 15:35 15:36 15:37 15:38 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-6
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-6 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 15:23:08 900 58.4 88 74.3 49 67.7 60.5 60 57.6 55.5 52 40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 14:23 14:24 14:25 14:26 14:27 14:28 14:29 14:30 14:31 14:32 14:33 14:34 14:35 14:36 14:37 14:38 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-7
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-7 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 14:23:32 900 46.7 76.3 55.5 40.5 50.5 49.3 49 47.8 46.3 43.1 45 47
49 51
53 55
57 59
61 63
65 13:56 13:57 13:58 13:59 14:00 14:01 14:02 14:03 14:04 14:05 14:06 14:07 14:08 14:09 14:10 14:11 Sound Level, dBA
Time of Day
Fresno SW Specific Plan
Measurement Location ST-8
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
ST-8 Intervals
Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin L( 2) L( 8) L(10) L(25) L(50) L(90) ---------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 17-May-17 13:56:40 900 57.9 87.4 70.6 44.7 65.4 62.3 61.7 58.4 54.5 48.2 1 Whitesbridge Ave Marks Ave to Roeding Dr 2,800 55 12 50 Soft 2U 1 2 Whitesbridge Ave Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave 2,300 45 12 50 Soft 2U 2 3 Kearney Blvd Marks Ave to West Ave 2,400 45 12 50 Soft 2U 3 4 Kearney Blvd West Ave to Thorne Ave 2,000 45 12 50 Soft 2U 4 5 California Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 2,000 55 12 50 Soft 2U 5 6 California Ave West Ave to Fresno St 4,300 35 48 50 Soft 4D 6 7 California Ave Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd 6,600 35 24 50 Soft 2D 7 8 Ventura St MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street 9,900 35 48 50 Soft 4D 8 9 Church Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 1,200 50 12 50 Soft 2U 9 10 Church Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 2,600 40 12 50 Soft 2U 10 11 Church Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 4,300 40 12 50 Soft 2U 11 12 Jensen Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 5,200 55 12 50 Soft 2U 12 13 Jensen Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 8,700 55 12 50 Soft 2U 13 14 Jensen Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 12,000 45 48 50 Soft 4D 14 15 North Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 5,200 40 12 50 Soft 2U 15 16 Marks Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 6,900 55 24 50 Soft 2D 16 17 Marks Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 2,300 55 12 50 Soft 2U 17 18 Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave 2,600 40 36 50 Soft 4U 18 19 Hughes Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 400 55 12 50 Soft 2U 19 20 Hughes Ave California Ave to Church Ave 200 55 12 50 Soft 2U 20 21 Roeding Dr/West Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 900 40 12 50 Soft 2U 21 22 West Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 900 55 12 50 Soft 2U 22 23 Fruit Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 2,400 40 12 50 Soft 2U 23 24 Thorne Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 2,900 40 12 50 Soft 2U 24 25 Walnut Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 3,600 40 12 50 Soft 2U 25 26 Walnut Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 600 55 12 50 Soft 2U 26 27 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdCalifornia Ave to Jensen Ave 6,300 35 12 50 Soft 2U 27 28 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdJensen Ave to North Ave 3,300 45 12 50 Soft 2U 28 29 Elm Ave Ventura St to Jensen Ave 7,100 40 48 50 Soft 4D 29 30 Elm Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 4,800 40 48 50 Soft 4D 30 Southwest Fresno SP
EXISTING
LANES
SITE
CONDITION
DISTANCE
to Reciever
LANE
DISTANCE
POSTED
SPEED
# ROADWAY SEGMENT ADT LIMIT
ROAD
CLASSIFICATION SPEED
LANE
DISTANCE ANALYST
2U 40 12 NJF 73.6 75.55%
4U 40 36 13.6 13.96%
4D 45 48 10.22 10.49%
6D 45 84
2D 40 24
DAILY HOURLY
% A 97.42% DAY 75.5%
% MT 1.84% EVENING 14.0%
% HT 0.74% NIGHT 10.5%
Source: Riverside, County of, Department of Public Health, Office of Industrial Hygiene. 2009, November. For Determining and M Riverside County Fleet Mix: Secondary, Collectors, or Smaller Vehicle Overall % Day (7 AM to Evening (7 Night (10 PM to 7 AM) Auto 97% 73.60 13.60 10.22
Medium Truck 2% 0.90 0.04 0.90
Heavy Truck 1% 0.35 0.04 0.35
74.85 13.68 11.47
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
EXISTING
CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
Distance to
Reciever CNEL
dBA
CNEL
dBA
CNEL
60 dBA CNEL
1 Whitesbridge Ave Marks Ave to Roeding Dr 2,800 50 64.8 22 48 104 2 Whitesbridge Ave Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave 2,300 50 61.7 14 30 65 3 Kearney Blvd Marks Ave to West Ave 2,400 50 61.9 14 31 66 4 Kearney Blvd West Ave to Thorne Ave 2,000 50 61.1 13 27 59 5 California Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 2,000 50 63.3 18 39 83 6 California Ave West Ave to Fresno St 4,300 50 61.9 14 31 67 7 California Ave Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd 6,600 50 63.6 19 40 87 8 Ventura St MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street 9,900 50 65.5 25 54 116 9 Church Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 1,200 50 60.0 11 23 50 10 Church Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 2,600 50 60.9 12 27 58 11 Church Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 4,300 50 63.1 17 37 81 12 Jensen Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 5,200 50 67.5 34 73 157 13 Jensen Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 8,700 50 69.7 48 103 221 14 Jensen Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 12,000 50 69.0 43 93 200 15 North Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 5,200 50 63.9 20 42 92 16 Marks Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 6,900 50 68.7 41 89 191 17 Marks Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 2,300 50 63.9 20 42 91 18 Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave 2,600 50 61.0 13 27 59 19 Hughes Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 400 50 56.3 6 13 28 20 Hughes Ave California Ave to Church Ave 200 50 53.3 4 8 18 21 Roeding Dr/West Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 900 50 56.3 6 13 28 22 West Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 900 50 59.8 11 23 49 23 Fruit Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 2,400 50 60.6 12 25 55 24 Thorne Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 2,900 50 61.4 13 29 62 25 Walnut Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 3,600 50 62.3 15 33 72 26 Walnut Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 600 50 58.1 8 17 37 27 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdCalifornia Ave to Jensen Ave 6,300 50 63.4 18 39 84 28 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdJensen Ave to North Ave 3,300 50 63.2 18 38 82 29 Elm Ave Ventura St to Jensen Ave 7,100 50 65.5 25 54 116 30 Elm Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 4,800 50 63.8 19 41 89 Noise Level
(dBA)
# ROADWAY
Southwest Fresno SP
SEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Whitesbridge Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to Roeding Dr Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,800
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 172 3 1 127 2 1 32 1 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -10.4 -27.6 -31.6 -11.7 -28.9 -32.9 -17.7 -34.9 -38.9 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.3 52.2 52.2 61.0 50.8 50.9 54.9 44.8 44.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.0 Leq EVENING= 61.7 Leq NIGHT= 55.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 61.3
Ldn= 64.1
CNEL= 64.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 20 44 94 CNEL: 22 48 104
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Whitesbridge Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,300
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 141 3 1 104 2 1 26 0 0
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -10.3 -27.6 -31.5 -11.7 -28.9 -32.9 -17.7 -34.9 -38.9 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 58.9 49.9 50.5 57.6 48.6 49.2 51.6 42.6 43.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 60.0 Leq EVENING= 58.6 Leq NIGHT= 52.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 58.2
Ldn= 61.0
CNEL= 61.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 13 27 59 CNEL: 14 30 65
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Kearney Blvd Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,400
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 147 3 1 109 2 1 27 1 0
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -10.2 -27.4 -31.4 -11.5 -28.7 -32.7 -17.5 -34.7 -38.7 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 59.1 50.1 50.7 57.8 48.8 49.4 51.8 42.8 43.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 60.1 Leq EVENING= 58.8 Leq NIGHT= 52.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 58.3
Ldn= 61.2
CNEL= 61.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 13 28 60 CNEL: 14 31 66
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Kearney Blvd Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Thorne Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,000
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 123 2 1 91 2 1 23 0 0
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -11.0 -28.2 -32.1 -12.3 -29.5 -33.5 -18.3 -35.5 -39.5 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 58.3 49.3 49.9 57.0 48.0 48.6 51.0 42.0 42.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 59.3 Leq EVENING= 58.0 Leq NIGHT= 52.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 57.6
Ldn= 60.4
CNEL= 61.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 12 25 53 CNEL: 13 27 59
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,000
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 123 2 1 91 2 1 23 0 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -11.8 -29.1 -33.0 -13.1 -30.4 -34.3 -19.1 -36.4 -40.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.8 50.7 50.7 59.5 49.4 49.4 53.5 43.4 43.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.6 Leq EVENING= 60.3 Leq NIGHT= 54.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 59.8
Ldn= 62.7
CNEL= 63.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 16 35 75 CNEL: 18 39 83
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Fresno St Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 4,300
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 264 5 2 195 4 1 49 1 0
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.5 -23.8 -27.7 -7.8 -25.1 -29.0 -13.9 -31.1 -35.1 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 58.7 51.1 52.4 57.4 49.8 51.1 51.3 43.8 45.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 60.2 Leq EVENING= 58.9 Leq NIGHT= 52.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 58.4
Ldn= 61.3
CNEL= 61.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 13 28 61 CNEL: 14 31 67
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,600
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 24
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 405 8 3 299 6 2 75 1 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.7 -21.9 -25.9 -6.0 -23.2 -27.2 -12.0 -29.2 -33.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.4 52.9 54.1 59.1 51.5 52.8 53.1 45.5 46.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.9 Leq EVENING= 60.6 Leq NIGHT= 54.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 60.1
Ldn= 63.0
CNEL= 63.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 17 37 79 CNEL: 19 40 87
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Ventura St Analyst: NJF
Segment: MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 9,900
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 607 11 5 449 8 3 112 2 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.9 -20.2 -24.1 -4.2 -21.5 -25.4 -10.2 -27.5 -31.4 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.3 54.8 56.0 61.0 53.5 54.7 55.0 47.4 48.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.8 Leq EVENING= 62.5 Leq NIGHT= 56.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.0
Ldn= 64.9
CNEL= 65.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 23 49 106 CNEL: 25 54 116
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Church Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 1,200
SPEED (mph) 50
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 74 1 1 54 1 0 14 0 0
Speed in MPH 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 71.1 78.8 83.0 71.1 78.8 83.0 71.1 78.8 83.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -13.6 -30.9 -34.8 -14.9 -32.2 -36.1 -21.0 -38.2 -42.1 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 57.4 47.8 48.1 56.1 46.5 46.8 50.1 40.5 40.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 58.3 Leq EVENING= 57.0 Leq NIGHT= 51.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 56.5
Ldn= 59.4
CNEL= 60.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 10 21 46 CNEL: 11 23 50
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Church Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Walnut Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,600
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 159 3 1 118 2 1 30 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -9.3 -26.5 -30.5 -10.6 -27.9 -31.8 -16.6 -33.9 -37.8 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 58.0 49.7 50.6 56.7 48.4 49.3 50.6 42.4 43.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 59.2 Leq EVENING= 57.9 Leq NIGHT= 51.9 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 57.4
Ldn= 60.3
CNEL= 60.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 11 24 52 CNEL: 12 27 58
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
11 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Church Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 4,300
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 264 5 2 195 4 1 49 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -7.1 -24.4 -28.3 -8.4 -25.7 -29.6 -14.4 -31.7 -35.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.2 51.9 52.8 58.8 50.6 51.4 52.8 44.5 45.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.4 Leq EVENING= 60.1 Leq NIGHT= 54.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 59.6
Ldn= 62.5
CNEL= 63.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 16 34 73 CNEL: 17 37 81
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
12 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 5,200
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 319 6 2 236 4 2 59 1 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -7.7 -24.9 -28.9 -9.0 -26.2 -30.2 -15.0 -32.2 -36.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.0 54.8 54.9 63.6 53.5 53.5 57.6 47.5 47.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.7 Leq EVENING= 64.4 Leq NIGHT= 58.4 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.9
Ldn= 66.8
CNEL= 67.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 31 66 143 CNEL: 34 73 157
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
13 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: West Ave to Walnut Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 8,700
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 534 10 4 394 7 3 99 2 1
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.4 -22.7 -26.6 -6.8 -24.0 -27.9 -12.8 -30.0 -34.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 67.2 57.1 57.1 65.9 55.8 55.8 59.9 49.8 49.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.0 Leq EVENING= 66.7 Leq NIGHT= 60.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.2
Ldn= 69.1
CNEL= 69.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 43 93 201 CNEL: 48 103 221
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
14 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 12,000
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 736 14 6 544 10 4 136 3 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.2 -20.4 -24.4 -4.5 -21.7 -25.7 -10.5 -27.7 -31.7 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.3 57.3 57.9 65.0 56.0 56.6 58.9 50.0 50.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.3 Leq EVENING= 66.0 Leq NIGHT= 60.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 65.5
Ldn= 68.4
CNEL= 69.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 39 84 182 CNEL: 43 93 200
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
15 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: North Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 5,200
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 319 6 2 236 4 2 59 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.3 -23.5 -27.5 -7.6 -24.8 -28.8 -13.6 -30.9 -34.8 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 61.0 52.7 53.6 59.7 51.4 52.3 53.7 45.4 46.3
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 62.2 Leq EVENING= 60.9 Leq NIGHT= 54.9 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 60.4
Ldn= 63.3
CNEL= 63.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 18 39 83 CNEL: 20 42 92
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
16 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Marks Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,900
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 24
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 423 8 3 313 6 2 78 1 1
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.4 -23.7 -27.6 -7.8 -25.0 -29.0 -13.8 -31.0 -35.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.2 56.1 56.1 64.9 54.8 54.8 58.9 48.8 48.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.0 Leq EVENING= 65.7 Leq NIGHT= 59.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 65.2
Ldn= 68.1
CNEL= 68.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 37 80 173 CNEL: 41 89 191
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
17 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Marks Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,300
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 141 3 1 104 2 1 26 0 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -11.2 -28.5 -32.4 -12.5 -29.8 -33.7 -18.5 -35.8 -39.7 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 61.4 51.3 51.3 60.1 50.0 50.0 54.1 44.0 44.0
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 62.2 Leq EVENING= 60.9 Leq NIGHT= 54.9 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 60.4
Ldn= 63.3
CNEL= 63.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 18 38 83 CNEL: 20 42 91
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
18 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Analyst:NJF
Segment: Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,600
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 36
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 159 3 1 118 2 1 30 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -9.3 -26.5 -30.5 -10.6 -27.9 -31.8 -16.6 -33.9 -37.8 Distance (reference) -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 58.1 49.8 50.7 56.7 48.5 49.4 50.7 42.5 43.3
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 59.3 Leq EVENING= 58.0 Leq NIGHT= 52.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 57.5
Ldn= 60.4
CNEL= 61.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 11 25 53 CNEL: 13 27 59
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
19 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Hughes Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 400
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 25 0 0 18 0 0 5 0 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -18.8 -36.1 -40.0 -20.1 -37.4 -41.3 -26.1 -43.4 -47.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 53.8 43.7 43.7 52.5 42.4 42.4 46.5 36.4 36.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 54.6 Leq EVENING= 53.3 Leq NIGHT= 47.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 52.8
Ldn= 55.7
CNEL= 56.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 6 12 26 CNEL: 6 13 28
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
20 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Hughes Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Church Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 200
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 12 0 0 9 0 0 2 0 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -21.8 -39.1 -43.0 -23.1 -40.4 -44.3 -29.1 -46.4 -50.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 50.8 40.7 40.7 49.5 39.4 39.4 43.5 33.4 33.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 51.6 Leq EVENING= 50.3 Leq NIGHT= 44.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 49.8
Ldn= 52.7
CNEL= 53.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 4 8 16 CNEL: 4 8 18
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
21 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Roeding Dr/West Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 900
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 55 1 0 41 1 0 10 0 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -13.9 -31.1 -35.1 -15.2 -32.5 -36.4 -21.2 -38.5 -42.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 53.4 45.1 46.0 52.0 43.8 44.7 46.0 37.7 38.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 54.6 Leq EVENING= 53.3 Leq NIGHT= 47.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 52.8
Ldn= 55.7
CNEL= 56.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 6 12 26 CNEL: 6 13 28
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
22 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: West Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 900
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 55 1 0 41 1 0 10 0 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -15.3 -32.5 -36.5 -16.6 -33.8 -37.8 -22.6 -39.9 -43.8 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 57.3 47.2 47.2 56.0 45.9 45.9 50.0 39.9 39.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 58.1 Leq EVENING= 56.8 Leq NIGHT= 50.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 56.3
Ldn= 59.2
CNEL= 59.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 10 21 44 CNEL: 11 23 49
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
23 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Fruit Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,400
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 147 3 1 109 2 1 27 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -9.6 -26.9 -30.8 -11.0 -28.2 -32.2 -17.0 -34.2 -38.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 57.6 49.3 50.2 56.3 48.0 48.9 50.3 42.0 42.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 58.9 Leq EVENING= 57.5 Leq NIGHT= 51.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 57.1
Ldn= 60.0
CNEL= 60.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 11 23 50 CNEL: 12 25 55
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
24 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Thorne Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 2,900
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 178 3 1 131 2 1 33 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -8.8 -26.1 -30.0 -10.1 -27.4 -31.3 -16.2 -33.4 -37.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 58.4 50.2 51.0 57.1 48.8 49.7 51.1 42.8 43.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 59.7 Leq EVENING= 58.4 Leq NIGHT= 52.4 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 57.9
Ldn= 60.8
CNEL= 61.4
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 12 26 56 CNEL: 13 29 62
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
25 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Walnut Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 3,600
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 221 4 2 163 3 1 41 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -7.9 -25.1 -29.1 -9.2 -26.4 -30.4 -15.2 -32.4 -36.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 59.4 51.1 52.0 58.1 49.8 50.7 52.1 43.8 44.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 60.6 Leq EVENING= 59.3 Leq NIGHT= 53.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 58.8
Ldn= 61.7
CNEL= 62.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 14 30 65 CNEL: 15 33 72
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
26 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Walnut Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 600
SPEED (mph) 55
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 37 1 0 27 1 0 7 0 0
Speed in MPH 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8 72.7 79.9 83.8
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -17.1 -34.3 -38.2 -18.4 -35.6 -39.6 -24.4 -41.6 -45.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 55.6 45.5 45.5 54.3 44.2 44.2 48.3 38.1 38.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 56.4 Leq EVENING= 55.0 Leq NIGHT= 49.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 54.6
Ldn= 57.5
CNEL= 58.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 7 16 34 CNEL: 8 17 37
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
27 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,300
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 386 7 3 286 5 2 72 1 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.9 -22.1 -26.1 -6.2 -23.4 -27.4 -12.2 -29.4 -33.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.1 52.6 53.9 58.8 51.3 52.6 52.8 45.3 46.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.6 Leq EVENING= 60.3 Leq NIGHT= 54.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 59.9
Ldn= 62.7
CNEL= 63.4
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 16 35 76 CNEL: 18 39 84
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
28 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 3,300
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 202 4 2 150 3 1 37 1 0
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -8.8 -26.0 -30.0 -10.1 -27.3 -31.3 -16.1 -33.3 -37.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.5 51.5 52.1 59.2 50.2 50.8 53.2 44.2 44.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.5 Leq EVENING= 60.2 Leq NIGHT= 54.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 59.7
Ldn= 62.6
CNEL= 63.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 16 35 75 CNEL: 18 38 82
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
29 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Elm Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Ventura St to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 7,100
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 435 8 3 322 6 2 81 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.9 -22.2 -26.1 -6.2 -23.5 -27.4 -12.3 -29.5 -33.5 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.5 54.2 55.1 61.2 52.9 53.8 55.2 46.9 47.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.8 Leq EVENING= 62.4 Leq NIGHT= 56.4 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.0
Ldn= 64.8
CNEL= 65.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 23 49 105 CNEL: 25 54 116
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
30 Scenario: EXISTING Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Elm Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 4,800
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 294 6 2 218 4 2 55 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.6 -23.9 -27.8 -7.9 -25.2 -29.1 -14.0 -31.2 -35.2 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.8 52.5 53.4 59.5 51.2 52.1 53.5 45.2 46.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 62.1 Leq EVENING= 60.7 Leq NIGHT= 54.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 60.3
Ldn= 63.1
CNEL= 63.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 17 38 81 CNEL: 19 41 89
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
1 Whitesbridge Ave Marks Ave to Roeding Dr 19,200 45 48 50 Soft 4D 1 2 Whitesbridge Ave Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave 6,300 45 12 50 Soft 2U 2 3 Kearney Blvd Marks Ave to West Ave 8,400 45 12 50 Soft 2U 3 4 Kearney Blvd West Ave to Thorne Ave 7,100 45 12 50 Soft 2U 4 5 California Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 5,300 45 12 50 Soft 2U 5 6 California Ave West Ave to Fresno St 17,000 35 48 50 Soft 4D 6 7 California Ave Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd 8,900 35 24 50 Soft 2D 7 8 Ventura St MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street 24,500 35 48 50 Soft 4D 8 9 Church Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 7,800 40 12 50 Soft 2U 9 10 Church Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 9,500 40 12 50 Soft 2U 10 11 Church Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 11,900 40 36 50 Soft 4U 11 12 Jensen Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 6,900 45 48 50 Soft 4D 12 13 Jensen Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 20,000 45 48 50 Soft 4D 13 14 Jensen Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 31,800 45 48 50 Soft 4D 14 15 North Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 11,000 40 12 50 Soft 2U 15 16 Marks Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 20,100 45 48 50 Soft 4D 16 17 Marks Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 7,300 45 48 50 Soft 4D 17 18 Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave 7,800 40 48 50 Soft 4D 18 19 Hughes Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 6,400 45 12 50 Soft 2U 19 20 Hughes Ave California Ave to Church Ave 3,100 45 12 50 Soft 2U 20 21 Roeding Dr/West Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 4,800 40 12 50 Soft 2U 21 22 West Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 6,600 45 12 50 Soft 2U 22 23 Fruit Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 10,100 40 12 50 Soft 2U 23 24 Thorne Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 6,300 40 12 50 Soft 2U 24 25 Walnut Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 11,900 40 12 50 Soft 2U 25 26 Walnut Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 9,400 45 12 50 Soft 2U 26 27 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdCalifornia Ave to Jensen Ave 17,300 35 12 50 Soft 2U 27 28 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdJensen Ave to North Ave 16,000 45 12 50 Soft 2U 28 29 Elm Ave Ventura St to Jensen Ave 10,900 40 48 50 Soft 4D 29 30 Elm Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 15,100 40 48 50 Soft 4D 30 Southwest Fresno SP
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT
LANES
SITE
CONDITION
DISTANCE
to Reciever
LANE
DISTANCE
POSTED
SPEED
# ROADWAY SEGMENT ADT LIMIT
ROAD
CLASSIFICATION SPEED
LANE
DISTANCE ANALYST
2U 40 12 NJF 73.6 75.55%
4U 40 36 13.6 13.96%
4D 45 48 10.22 10.49%
6D 45 84
2D 40 24
DAILY HOURLY
% A 97.42% DAY 75.5%
% MT 1.84% EVENING 14.0%
% HT 0.74% NIGHT 10.5%
Source: Riverside, County of, Department of Public Health, Office of Industrial Hygiene. 2009, November. For Determining and M Riverside County Fleet Mix: Secondary, Collectors, or Smaller Vehicle Overall % Day (7 AM to Evening (7 Night (10 PM to 7 AM) Auto 97% 73.60 13.60 10.22
Medium Truck 2% 0.90 0.04 0.90
Heavy Truck 1% 0.35 0.04 0.35
74.85 13.68 11.47
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT
CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.
Distance to
Reciever Leq Ldn CNEL
dBA
CNEL
dBA
CNEL
60 dBA CNEL
1 Whitesbridge Ave Marks Ave to Roeding Dr 19,200 50 67.6 70.4 71.1 59 127 274 2 Whitesbridge Ave Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave 6,300 50 62.5 65.4 66.0 27 59 127 3 Kearney Blvd Marks Ave to West Ave 8,400 50 63.8 66.7 67.3 33 71 153 4 Kearney Blvd West Ave to Thorne Ave 7,100 50 63.1 65.9 66.6 30 64 137 5 California Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 5,300 50 61.8 64.7 65.3 24 52 113 6 California Ave West Ave to Fresno St 17,000 50 64.3 67.2 67.9 36 78 167 7 California Ave Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd 8,900 50 61.4 64.3 64.9 23 49 106 8 Ventura St MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street 24,500 50 65.9 68.8 69.4 46 99 213 9 Church Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 7,800 50 62.2 65.1 65.7 26 56 120 10 Church Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 9,500 50 63.0 65.9 66.6 29 63 137 11 Church Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 11,900 50 64.1 67.0 67.6 35 75 161 12 Jensen Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 6,900 50 63.1 66.0 66.6 30 64 138 13 Jensen Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 20,000 50 67.7 70.6 71.2 61 130 281 14 Jensen Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 31,800 50 69.7 72.6 73.3 82 178 383 15 North Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 11,000 50 63.7 66.6 67.2 32 70 151 16 Marks Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 20,100 50 67.8 70.6 71.3 61 131 282 17 Marks Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 7,300 50 63.4 66.2 66.9 31 67 144 18 Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave 7,800 50 62.4 65.3 65.9 27 57 123 19 Hughes Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 6,400 50 62.6 65.5 66.1 28 59 128 20 Hughes Ave California Ave to Church Ave 3,100 50 59.5 62.3 63.0 17 37 79 21 Roeding Dr/West Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 4,800 50 60.1 63.0 63.6 19 40 87 22 West Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 6,600 50 62.7 65.6 66.3 28 61 131 23 Fruit Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 10,100 50 63.3 66.2 66.8 31 66 142 24 Thorne Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 6,300 50 61.3 64.1 64.8 22 48 104 25 Walnut Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 11,900 50 64.0 66.9 67.5 34 74 159 26 Walnut Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 9,400 50 64.3 67.2 67.8 36 77 165 27 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvCalifornia Ave to Jensen Ave 17,300 50 64.2 67.1 67.8 35 76 164 28 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvJensen Ave to North Ave 16,000 50 66.6 69.5 70.1 51 109 236 29 Elm Ave Ventura St to Jensen Ave 10,900 50 63.8 66.7 67.3 33 72 154 30 Elm Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 15,100 50 65.2 68.1 68.8 41 89 192 Noise Level (dBA)
# ROADWAY
Southwest Fresno SP
SEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Whitesbridge Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to Roeding Dr Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,200
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1178 22 9 870 16 7 218 4 2
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.1 -18.4 -22.3 -2.4 -19.7 -23.6 -8.5 -25.7 -29.6 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 68.3 59.3 59.9 67.0 58.0 58.6 61.0 52.0 52.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 69.3 Leq EVENING= 68.0 Leq NIGHT= 62.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 67.6
Ldn= 70.4
CNEL= 71.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 54 115 248 CNEL: 59 127 274
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Whitesbridge Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,300
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 386 7 3 286 5 2 72 1 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.0 -23.2 -27.2 -7.3 -24.5 -28.5 -13.3 -30.5 -34.5 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.3 54.3 54.9 62.0 53.0 53.6 56.0 47.0 47.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.3 Leq EVENING= 63.0 Leq NIGHT= 57.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.5
Ldn= 65.4
CNEL= 66.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 25 53 115 CNEL: 27 59 127
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Kearney Blvd Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 8,400
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 515 10 4 381 7 3 95 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.7 -22.0 -25.9 -6.0 -23.3 -27.2 -12.0 -29.3 -33.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.5 55.6 56.1 63.2 54.3 54.8 57.2 48.2 48.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.6 Leq EVENING= 64.3 Leq NIGHT= 58.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.8
Ldn= 66.7
CNEL= 67.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 30 65 139 CNEL: 33 71 153
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Kearney Blvd Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Thorne Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 7,100
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 435 8 3 322 6 2 81 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.4 -22.7 -26.6 -6.8 -24.0 -28.0 -12.8 -30.0 -34.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.8 54.8 55.4 62.5 53.5 54.1 56.5 47.5 48.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.8 Leq EVENING= 63.5 Leq NIGHT= 57.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.1
Ldn= 65.9
CNEL= 66.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 27 58 124 CNEL: 30 64 137
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 5,300
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 325 6 2 240 5 2 60 1 0
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.7 -24.0 -27.9 -8.0 -25.3 -29.2 -14.0 -31.3 -35.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.5 53.6 54.1 61.2 52.3 52.8 55.2 46.2 46.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.6 Leq EVENING= 62.3 Leq NIGHT= 56.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 61.8
Ldn= 64.7
CNEL= 65.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 22 48 102 CNEL: 24 52 113
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Fresno St Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 17,000
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1043 20 8 771 15 6 193 4 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -0.6 -17.8 -21.8 -1.9 -19.1 -23.1 -7.9 -25.1 -29.1 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.6 57.1 58.4 63.3 55.8 57.1 57.3 49.8 51.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.1 Leq EVENING= 64.8 Leq NIGHT= 58.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.3
Ldn= 67.2
CNEL= 67.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 33 70 152 CNEL: 36 78 167
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 8,900
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 24
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 546 10 4 403 8 3 101 2 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.4 -20.6 -24.6 -4.7 -21.9 -25.9 -10.7 -27.9 -31.9 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 61.7 54.2 55.4 60.4 52.8 54.1 54.4 46.8 48.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.2 Leq EVENING= 61.9 Leq NIGHT= 55.9 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 61.4
Ldn= 64.3
CNEL= 64.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 21 45 96 CNEL: 23 49 106
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Ventura St Analyst: NJF
Segment: MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 24,500
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1503 28 11 1111 21 8 278 5 2
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 1.0 -16.2 -20.2 -0.3 -17.5 -21.5 -6.3 -23.5 -27.5
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.2 58.7 60.0 64.9 57.4 58.6 58.9 51.4 52.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.7 Leq EVENING= 66.4 Leq NIGHT= 60.4 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 65.9
Ldn= 68.8
CNEL= 69.4
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 42 90 194 CNEL: 46 99 213
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Church Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 7,800
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 478 9 4 354 7 3 89 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.5 -21.8 -25.7 -5.8 -23.1 -27.0 -11.9 -29.1 -33.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.7 54.5 55.3 61.4 53.1 54.0 55.4 47.1 48.0
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.0 Leq EVENING= 62.7 Leq NIGHT= 56.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.2
Ldn= 65.1
CNEL= 65.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 23 51 109 CNEL: 26 56 120
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Church Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Walnut Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 9,500
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 583 11 4 431 8 3 108 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.7 -20.9 -24.9 -5.0 -22.2 -26.2 -11.0 -28.2 -32.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.6 55.3 56.2 62.3 54.0 54.9 56.3 48.0 48.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.8 Leq EVENING= 63.5 Leq NIGHT= 57.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.0
Ldn= 65.9
CNEL= 66.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 27 58 124 CNEL: 29 63 137
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
11 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Church Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 11,900
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 36
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 730 14 6 539 10 4 135 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.7 -19.9 -23.9 -4.0 -21.2 -25.2 -10.0 -27.3 -31.2 Distance (reference) -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.7 56.4 57.3 63.4 55.1 56.0 57.3 49.1 49.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.9 Leq EVENING= 64.6 Leq NIGHT= 58.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.1
Ldn= 67.0
CNEL= 67.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 32 68 147 CNEL: 35 75 161
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
12 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,900
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 423 8 3 313 6 2 78 1 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.6 -22.8 -26.8 -6.9 -24.1 -28.1 -12.9 -30.1 -34.1 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.9 54.9 55.5 62.5 53.6 54.2 56.5 47.6 48.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.9 Leq EVENING= 63.6 Leq NIGHT= 57.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.1
Ldn= 66.0
CNEL= 66.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 27 58 126 CNEL: 30 64 138
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
13 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: West Ave to Walnut Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 20,000
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1227 23 9 907 17 7 227 4 2
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.0 -18.2 -22.1 -2.3 -19.5 -23.5 -8.3 -25.5 -29.5 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 68.5 59.5 60.1 67.2 58.2 58.8 61.2 52.2 52.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 69.5 Leq EVENING= 68.2 Leq NIGHT= 62.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 67.7
Ldn= 70.6
CNEL= 71.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 55 118 255 CNEL: 61 130 281
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
14 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 31,800
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1950 37 15 1442 27 11 361 7 3
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 1.1 -16.2 -20.1 -0.2 -17.5 -21.4 -6.3 -23.5 -27.5
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 70.5 61.5 62.1 69.2 60.2 60.8 63.2 54.2 54.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 71.5 Leq EVENING= 70.2 Leq NIGHT= 64.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 69.7
Ldn= 72.6
CNEL= 73.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 75 161 348 CNEL: 82 178 383
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
15 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: North Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 11,000
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 675 13 5 499 9 4 125 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.0 -20.3 -24.2 -4.3 -21.6 -25.5 -10.4 -27.6 -31.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.2 55.9 56.8 62.9 54.6 55.5 56.9 48.6 49.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.5 Leq EVENING= 64.2 Leq NIGHT= 58.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.7
Ldn= 66.6
CNEL= 67.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 30 64 137 CNEL: 32 70 151
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
16 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Marks Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 20,100
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1233 23 9 911 17 7 228 4 2
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -0.9 -18.2 -22.1 -2.2 -19.5 -23.4 -8.3 -25.5 -29.4 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 68.5 59.5 60.1 67.2 58.2 58.8 61.2 52.2 52.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 69.5 Leq EVENING= 68.2 Leq NIGHT= 62.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 67.8
Ldn= 70.6
CNEL= 71.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 55 119 256 CNEL: 61 131 282
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
17 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Marks Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 7,300
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 448 8 3 331 6 3 83 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.3 -22.6 -26.5 -6.6 -23.9 -27.8 -12.7 -29.9 -33.8 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.1 55.1 55.7 62.8 53.8 54.4 56.8 47.8 48.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.1 Leq EVENING= 63.8 Leq NIGHT= 57.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.4
Ldn= 66.2
CNEL= 66.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 28 61 130 CNEL: 31 67 144
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
18 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Analyst:NJF
Segment: Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 7,800
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 478 9 4 354 7 3 89 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.5 -21.8 -25.7 -5.8 -23.1 -27.0 -11.9 -29.1 -33.0 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.9 54.6 55.5 61.6 53.3 54.2 55.6 47.3 48.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.2 Leq EVENING= 62.8 Leq NIGHT= 56.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.4
Ldn= 65.3
CNEL= 65.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 24 52 112 CNEL: 27 57 123
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
19 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Hughes Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,400
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 393 7 3 290 5 2 73 1 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.9 -23.1 -27.1 -7.2 -24.5 -28.4 -13.2 -30.5 -34.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.4 54.4 55.0 62.0 53.1 53.6 56.0 47.1 47.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.4 Leq EVENING= 63.1 Leq NIGHT= 57.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.6
Ldn= 65.5
CNEL= 66.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 25 54 116 CNEL: 28 59 128
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
20 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Hughes Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Church Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 3,100
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 190 4 1 141 3 1 35 1 0
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -9.0 -26.3 -30.2 -10.4 -27.6 -31.6 -16.4 -33.6 -37.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.2 51.2 51.8 58.9 49.9 50.5 52.9 43.9 44.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.2 Leq EVENING= 59.9 Leq NIGHT= 53.9 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 59.5
Ldn= 62.3
CNEL= 63.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 15 33 72 CNEL: 17 37 79
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
21 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Roeding Dr/West Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 4,800
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 294 6 2 218 4 2 55 1 0
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.6 -23.9 -27.8 -7.9 -25.2 -29.1 -14.0 -31.2 -35.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 60.6 52.3 53.2 59.3 51.0 51.9 53.3 45.0 45.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 61.9 Leq EVENING= 60.6 Leq NIGHT= 54.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 60.1
Ldn= 63.0
CNEL= 63.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 17 37 79 CNEL: 19 40 87
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
22 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: West Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,600
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 405 8 3 299 6 2 75 1 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.8 -23.0 -27.0 -7.1 -24.3 -28.3 -13.1 -30.3 -34.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.5 54.5 55.1 62.2 53.2 53.8 56.2 47.2 47.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.5 Leq EVENING= 63.2 Leq NIGHT= 57.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.7
Ldn= 65.6
CNEL= 66.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 26 55 119 CNEL: 28 61 131
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
23 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Fruit Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 10,100
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 619 12 5 458 9 3 115 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.4 -20.6 -24.6 -4.7 -22.0 -25.9 -10.7 -28.0 -31.9 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.9 55.6 56.5 62.5 54.3 55.2 56.5 48.2 49.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.1 Leq EVENING= 63.8 Leq NIGHT= 57.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.3
Ldn= 66.2
CNEL= 66.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 28 60 129 CNEL: 31 66 142
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
24 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Thorne Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,300
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 386 7 3 286 5 2 72 1 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.5 -22.7 -26.7 -6.8 -24.0 -28.0 -12.8 -30.0 -34.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 61.8 53.5 54.4 60.5 52.2 53.1 54.5 46.2 47.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.1 Leq EVENING= 61.7 Leq NIGHT= 55.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 61.3
Ldn= 64.1
CNEL= 64.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 20 44 94 CNEL: 22 48 104
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
25 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Walnut Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 11,900
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 730 14 6 539 10 4 135 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.7 -19.9 -23.9 -4.0 -21.2 -25.2 -10.0 -27.3 -31.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.6 56.3 57.2 63.3 55.0 55.9 57.2 49.0 49.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.8 Leq EVENING= 64.5 Leq NIGHT= 58.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.0
Ldn= 66.9
CNEL= 67.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 31 67 144 CNEL: 34 74 159
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
26 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Walnut Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 9,400
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 577 11 4 426 8 3 107 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.2 -21.5 -25.4 -5.5 -22.8 -26.7 -11.6 -28.8 -32.7 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.0 56.1 56.6 63.7 54.7 55.3 57.7 48.7 49.3
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.1 Leq EVENING= 64.8 Leq NIGHT= 58.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.3
Ldn= 67.2
CNEL= 67.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 32 70 150 CNEL: 36 77 165
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
27 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 17,300
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1061 20 8 784 15 6 196 4 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -0.5 -17.7 -21.7 -1.8 -19.0 -23.0 -7.8 -25.1 -29.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.5 57.0 58.3 63.2 55.7 57.0 57.2 49.7 50.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.0 Leq EVENING= 64.7 Leq NIGHT= 58.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.2
Ldn= 67.1
CNEL= 67.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 32 69 149 CNEL: 35 76 164
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
28 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 16,000
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 981 19 7 725 14 6 182 3 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.9 -19.2 -23.1 -3.2 -20.5 -24.4 -9.2 -26.5 -30.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 67.3 58.4 58.9 66.0 57.1 57.6 60.0 51.0 51.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.4 Leq EVENING= 67.1 Leq NIGHT= 61.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.6
Ldn= 69.5
CNEL= 70.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 46 99 214 CNEL: 51 109 236
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
29 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Elm Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Ventura St to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 10,900
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 669 13 5 494 9 4 124 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.1 -20.3 -24.3 -4.4 -21.6 -25.6 -10.4 -27.6 -31.6 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.4 56.1 57.0 63.1 54.8 55.7 57.0 48.8 49.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.6 Leq EVENING= 64.3 Leq NIGHT= 58.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.8
Ldn= 66.7
CNEL= 67.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 30 65 140 CNEL: 33 72 154
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
30 Scenario: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Project: Southwest Fresno SP Roadway: Elm Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 15,100
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 926 17 7 685 13 5 171 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.7 -18.9 -22.9 -3.0 -20.2 -24.2 -9.0 -26.2 -30.2 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.8 57.5 58.4 64.5 56.2 57.1 58.5 50.2 51.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.0 Leq EVENING= 65.7 Leq NIGHT= 59.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 65.2
Ldn= 68.1
CNEL= 68.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 37 81 174 CNEL: 41 89 192
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
1 Whitesbridge Ave Marks Ave to Roeding Dr 19,500 45 48 50 Soft 4D 1 2 Whitesbridge Ave Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave 10,500 45 12 50 Soft 2U 2 3 Kearney Blvd Marks Ave to West Ave 9,700 45 12 50 Soft 2U 3 4 Kearney Blvd West Ave to Thorne Ave 9,900 45 12 50 Soft 2U 4 5 California Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 8,800 45 12 50 Soft 2U 5 6 California Ave West Ave to Fresno St 26,200 35 48 50 Soft 4D 6 7 California Ave Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd 11,900 35 24 50 Soft 2D 7 8 Ventura St MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street 35,400 35 48 50 Soft 4D 8 9 Church Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 6,700 40 12 50 Soft 2U 9 10 Church Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 14,200 40 12 50 Soft 2U 10 11 Church Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 19,600 40 36 50 Soft 4U 11 12 Jensen Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 19,600 45 48 50 Soft 4D 12 13 Jensen Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 31,400 45 48 50 Soft 4D 13 14 Jensen Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 38,700 45 48 50 Soft 4D 14 15 North Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 17,500 40 12 50 Soft 2U 15 16 Marks Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 31,900 45 48 50 Soft 4D 16 17 Marks Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 13,800 45 48 50 Soft 4D 17 18 Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave 19,000 40 48 50 Soft 4D 18 19 Hughes Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 8,100 45 12 50 Soft 2U 19 20 Hughes Ave California Ave to Church Ave 5,900 45 12 50 Soft 2U 20 21 Roeding Dr/West Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 11,000 40 12 50 Soft 2U 21 22 West Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 15,000 45 12 50 Soft 2U 22 23 Fruit Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 12,300 40 12 50 Soft 2U 23 24 Thorne Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 5,900 40 12 50 Soft 2U 24 25 Walnut Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 11,800 40 12 50 Soft 2U 25 26 Walnut Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 14,600 45 12 50 Soft 2U 26 27 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdCalifornia Ave to Jensen Ave 19,300 35 12 50 Soft 2U 27 28 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdJensen Ave to North Ave 15,900 45 12 50 Soft 2U 28 29 Elm Ave Ventura St to Jensen Ave 19,300 40 48 50 Soft 4D 29 30 Elm Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 15,600 40 48 50 Soft 4D 30 Southwest Fresno SP
CUMULATIVE
LANES
SITE
CONDITION
DISTANCE
to Reciever
LANE
DISTANCE
POSTED
SPEED
# ROADWAY SEGMENT ADT LIMIT
ROAD
CLASSIFICATION SPEED
LANE
DISTANCE ANALYST
2U 40 12 NJF 73.6 75.55%
4U 40 36 13.6 13.96%
4D 45 48 10.22 10.49%
6D 45 84
2D 40 24
DAILY HOURLY
% A 97.42% DAY 75.5%
% MT 1.84% EVENING 14.0%
% HT 0.74% NIGHT 10.5%
Source: Riverside, County of, Department of Public Health, Office of Industrial Hygiene. 2009, November. For Determining and M Riverside County Fleet Mix: Secondary, Collectors, or Smaller Vehicle Overall % Day (7 AM to Evening (7 Night (10 PM to 7 AM) Auto 97% 73.60 13.60 10.22
Medium Truck 2% 0.90 0.04 0.90
Heavy Truck 1% 0.35 0.04 0.35
74.85 13.68 11.47
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CUMULATIVE
CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
Distance to
Reciever CNEL
dBA
CNEL
dBA
CNEL
60 dBA CNEL
1 Whitesbridge Ave Marks Ave to Roeding Dr 19,500 50 71.1 60 128 276 2 Whitesbridge Ave Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave 10,500 50 68.3 38 83 178 3 Kearney Blvd Marks Ave to West Ave 9,700 50 67.9 36 78 169 4 Kearney Blvd West Ave to Thorne Ave 9,900 50 68.0 37 79 171 5 California Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 8,800 50 67.5 34 73 158 6 California Ave West Ave to Fresno St 26,200 50 69.7 48 103 223 7 California Ave Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd 11,900 50 66.2 28 60 129 8 Ventura St MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street 35,400 50 71.0 59 126 272 9 Church Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 6,700 50 65.0 23 50 108 10 Church Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 14,200 50 68.3 39 83 179 11 Church Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 19,600 50 69.8 48 104 225 12 Jensen Ave Marks Ave to West Ave 19,600 50 71.2 60 129 277 13 Jensen Ave West Ave to Walnut Ave 31,400 50 73.2 82 176 380 14 Jensen Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 38,700 50 74.1 94 203 436 15 North Ave Walnut Ave to Elm Ave 17,500 50 69.2 44 95 206 16 Marks Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 31,900 50 73.3 83 178 384 17 Marks Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 13,800 50 69.6 47 102 219 18 Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave 19,000 50 69.7 48 104 223 19 Hughes Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 8,100 50 67.1 32 69 150 20 Hughes Ave California Ave to Church Ave 5,900 50 65.8 26 56 121 21 Roeding Dr/West Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 11,000 50 67.2 32 70 151 22 West Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 15,000 50 69.8 49 105 226 23 Fruit Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 12,300 50 67.7 35 75 162 24 Thorne Ave Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave 5,900 50 64.5 21 46 100 25 Walnut Ave California Ave to Jensen Ave 11,800 50 67.5 34 73 158 26 Walnut Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 14,600 50 69.7 48 103 222 27 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdCalifornia Ave to Jensen Ave 19,300 50 68.2 38 82 177 28 Martin Luther King Jr. BlvdJensen Ave to North Ave 15,900 50 70.1 51 109 235 29 Elm Ave Ventura St to Jensen Ave 19,300 50 69.8 49 105 226 30 Elm Ave Jensen Ave to North Ave 15,600 50 68.9 42 91 196 Noise Level
(dBA)
# ROADWAY
Southwest Fresno SP
SEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Whitesbridge Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to Roeding Dr Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,500
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1196 23 9 884 17 7 221 4 2
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.1 -18.3 -22.3 -2.4 -19.6 -23.6 -8.4 -25.6 -29.6 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 68.4 59.4 60.0 67.1 58.1 58.7 61.0 52.1 52.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 69.4 Leq EVENING= 68.1 Leq NIGHT= 62.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 67.6
Ldn= 70.5
CNEL= 71.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 54 117 251 CNEL: 60 128 276
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Whitesbridge Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Roeding Dr to Thorne Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 10,500
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 644 12 5 476 9 4 119 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.7 -21.0 -24.9 -5.1 -22.3 -26.3 -11.1 -28.3 -32.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.5 56.5 57.1 64.2 55.2 55.8 58.2 49.2 49.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.5 Leq EVENING= 65.2 Leq NIGHT= 59.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.8
Ldn= 67.6
CNEL= 68.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 35 75 162 CNEL: 38 83 178
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Kearney Blvd Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 9,700
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 595 11 5 440 8 3 110 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.1 -21.3 -25.3 -5.4 -22.6 -26.6 -11.4 -28.7 -32.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.2 56.2 56.8 63.8 54.9 55.4 57.8 48.9 49.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.2 Leq EVENING= 64.9 Leq NIGHT= 58.9 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.4
Ldn= 67.3
CNEL= 67.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 33 71 153 CNEL: 36 78 169
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Kearney Blvd Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Thorne Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 9,900
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 607 11 5 449 8 3 112 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.0 -21.2 -25.2 -5.3 -22.6 -26.5 -11.3 -28.6 -32.5 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.2 56.3 56.8 63.9 55.0 55.5 57.9 49.0 49.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.3 Leq EVENING= 65.0 Leq NIGHT= 59.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.5
Ldn= 67.4
CNEL= 68.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 33 72 155 CNEL: 37 79 171
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 8,800
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 540 10 4 399 8 3 100 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.5 -21.8 -25.7 -5.8 -23.1 -27.0 -11.8 -29.1 -33.0 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.7 55.8 56.3 63.4 54.5 55.0 57.4 48.4 49.0
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.8 Leq EVENING= 64.5 Leq NIGHT= 58.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.0
Ldn= 66.9
CNEL= 67.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 31 67 144 CNEL: 34 73 158
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Fresno St Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 26,200
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1607 30 12 1188 22 9 298 6 2
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 1.3 -15.9 -19.9 0.0 -17.2 -21.2 -6.0 -23.2 -27.2
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.5 59.0 60.3 65.2 57.7 58.9 59.2 51.7 52.9
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.0 Leq EVENING= 66.7 Leq NIGHT= 60.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.2
Ldn= 69.1
CNEL= 69.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 44 94 202 CNEL: 48 103 223
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: California Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Fresno St to MLK Jr. Blvd Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 11,900
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 24
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 730 14 6 539 10 4 135 3 1
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.1 -19.4 -23.3 -3.4 -20.7 -24.6 -9.4 -26.7 -30.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.9 55.4 56.7 61.6 54.1 55.4 55.6 48.1 49.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.4 Leq EVENING= 63.1 Leq NIGHT= 57.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.6
Ldn= 65.5
CNEL= 66.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 25 54 117 CNEL: 28 60 129
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Ventura St Analyst: NJF
Segment: MLK Jr. Blvd to B Street Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 35,400
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 2171 41 16 1605 30 12 402 8 3
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 2.6 -14.6 -18.6 1.3 -15.9 -19.9 -4.7 -21.9 -25.9
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 67.8 60.3 61.6 66.5 59.0 60.2 60.5 53.0 54.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 69.3 Leq EVENING= 68.0 Leq NIGHT= 62.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 67.5
Ldn= 70.4
CNEL= 71.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 53 115 247 CNEL: 59 126 272
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Church Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 6,700
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 411 8 3 304 6 2 76 1 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.2 -22.4 -26.4 -6.5 -23.7 -27.7 -12.5 -29.8 -33.7 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 62.1 53.8 54.7 60.8 52.5 53.4 54.8 46.5 47.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 63.3 Leq EVENING= 62.0 Leq NIGHT= 56.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 61.5
Ldn= 64.4
CNEL= 65.0
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 21 46 98 CNEL: 23 50 108
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Church Ave Analyst: NJF
Segment: West Ave to Walnut Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 14,200
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 871 16 7 644 12 5 161 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.9 -19.2 -23.1 -3.2 -20.5 -24.4 -9.3 -26.5 -30.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.3 57.1 57.9 64.0 55.7 56.6 58.0 49.7 50.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.6 Leq EVENING= 65.3 Leq NIGHT= 59.3 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.8
Ldn= 67.7
CNEL= 68.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 35 75 162 CNEL: 39 83 179
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
11 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Church Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,600
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 36
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1202 23 9 889 17 7 223 4 2
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -0.5 -17.8 -21.7 -1.8 -19.1 -23.0 -7.9 -25.1 -29.0 Distance (reference) -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.8 58.5 59.4 65.5 57.2 58.1 59.5 51.2 52.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.1 Leq EVENING= 66.8 Leq NIGHT= 60.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.3
Ldn= 69.2
CNEL= 69.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 44 95 204 CNEL: 48 104 225
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
12 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Marks Ave to West Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,600
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1202 23 9 889 17 7 223 4 2
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.0 -18.3 -22.2 -2.4 -19.6 -23.5 -8.4 -25.6 -29.6 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 68.4 59.4 60.0 67.1 58.1 58.7 61.1 52.1 52.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 69.4 Leq EVENING= 68.1 Leq NIGHT= 62.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 67.6
Ldn= 70.5
CNEL= 71.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 54 117 252 CNEL: 60 129 277
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
13 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: West Ave to Walnut Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 31,400
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1926 36 15 1423 27 11 357 7 3
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 1.0 -16.2 -20.2 -0.3 -17.5 -21.5 -6.3 -23.6 -27.5
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 70.4 61.5 62.0 69.1 60.2 60.7 63.1 54.2 54.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 71.5 Leq EVENING= 70.2 Leq NIGHT= 64.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 69.7
Ldn= 72.6
CNEL= 73.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 74 160 345 CNEL: 82 176 380
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
14 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Jensen Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 38,700
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 2374 45 18 1754 33 13 439 8 3
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 1.9 -15.3 -19.3 0.6 -16.6 -20.6 -5.4 -22.6 -26.6
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 71.3 62.4 63.0 70.0 61.1 61.6 64.0 55.1 55.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 72.4 Leq EVENING= 71.1 Leq NIGHT= 65.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 70.6
Ldn= 73.5
CNEL= 74.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 85 184 396 CNEL: 94 203 436
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
15 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: North Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Walnut Ave to Elm Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 17,500
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1073 20 8 793 15 6 199 4 2
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.0 -18.3 -22.2 -2.3 -19.6 -23.5 -8.3 -25.6 -29.5 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.2 58.0 58.9 64.9 56.6 57.5 58.9 50.6 51.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.5 Leq EVENING= 66.2 Leq NIGHT= 60.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 65.7
Ldn= 68.6
CNEL= 69.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 40 87 187 CNEL: 44 95 206
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
16 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Marks Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 31,900
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1957 37 15 1446 27 11 362 7 3
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 1.1 -16.2 -20.1 -0.2 -17.5 -21.4 -6.2 -23.5 -27.4
Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 70.5 61.5 62.1 69.2 60.2 60.8 63.2 54.2 54.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 71.6 Leq EVENING= 70.2 Leq NIGHT= 64.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 69.8
Ldn= 72.6
CNEL= 73.3
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 75 162 348 CNEL: 83 178 384
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
17 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Marks Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 13,800
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 846 16 6 626 12 5 157 3 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.6 -19.8 -23.8 -3.9 -21.1 -25.1 -9.9 -27.1 -31.1 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.9 57.9 58.5 65.6 56.6 57.2 59.5 50.6 51.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.9 Leq EVENING= 66.6 Leq NIGHT= 60.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.1
Ldn= 69.0
CNEL= 69.6
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 43 93 199 CNEL: 47 102 219
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
18 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Hughes Ave/Roeding Dr Analyst:NJF
Segment: Belmont Ave to Whitesbridge Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,000
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1165 22 9 861 16 7 216 4 2
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -0.7 -17.9 -21.9 -2.0 -19.2 -23.2 -8.0 -25.2 -29.2 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.8 58.5 59.4 65.5 57.2 58.1 59.5 51.2 52.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.0 Leq EVENING= 66.7 Leq NIGHT= 60.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.2
Ldn= 69.1
CNEL= 69.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 44 94 203 CNEL: 48 104 223
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
19 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Hughes Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 8,100
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 497 9 4 367 7 3 92 2 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -4.9 -22.1 -26.1 -6.2 -23.4 -27.4 -12.2 -29.4 -33.4 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.4 55.4 56.0 63.1 54.1 54.7 57.1 48.1 48.7
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.4 Leq EVENING= 64.1 Leq NIGHT= 58.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.6
Ldn= 66.5
CNEL= 67.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 29 63 136 CNEL: 32 69 150
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
20 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Hughes Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Church Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 5,900
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 362 7 3 267 5 2 67 1 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -6.3 -23.5 -27.4 -7.6 -24.8 -28.8 -13.6 -30.8 -34.8 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 63.0 54.0 54.6 61.7 52.7 53.3 55.7 46.7 47.3
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 64.0 Leq EVENING= 62.7 Leq NIGHT= 56.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 62.3
Ldn= 65.1
CNEL= 65.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 24 51 110 CNEL: 26 56 121
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
21 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Roeding Dr/West Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 11,000
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 675 13 5 499 9 4 125 2 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -3.0 -20.3 -24.2 -4.3 -21.6 -25.5 -10.4 -27.6 -31.6 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.2 55.9 56.8 62.9 54.6 55.5 56.9 48.6 49.5
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.5 Leq EVENING= 64.2 Leq NIGHT= 58.1 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 63.7
Ldn= 66.6
CNEL= 67.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 30 64 137 CNEL: 32 70 151
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
22 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: West Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 15,000
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 920 17 7 680 13 5 170 3 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.2 -19.4 -23.4 -3.5 -20.8 -24.7 -9.5 -26.8 -30.7 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 67.1 58.1 58.7 65.7 56.8 57.3 59.7 50.8 51.3
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.1 Leq EVENING= 66.8 Leq NIGHT= 60.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.3
Ldn= 69.2
CNEL= 69.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 44 95 205 CNEL: 49 105 226
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
23 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Fruit Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 12,300
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 754 14 6 558 11 4 140 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.6 -19.8 -23.7 -3.9 -21.1 -25.1 -9.9 -27.1 -31.1 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.7 56.4 57.3 63.4 55.1 56.0 57.4 49.1 50.0
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.0 Leq EVENING= 64.6 Leq NIGHT= 58.6 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.2
Ldn= 67.1
CNEL= 67.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 32 69 148 CNEL: 35 75 162
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
24 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Thorne Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Whitesbridge Ave to California Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 5,900
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 362 7 3 267 5 2 67 1 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -5.7 -23.0 -26.9 -7.1 -24.3 -28.2 -13.1 -30.3 -34.3 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 61.5 53.2 54.1 60.2 51.9 52.8 54.2 45.9 46.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 62.8 Leq EVENING= 61.5 Leq NIGHT= 55.4 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 61.0
Ldn= 63.9
CNEL= 64.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 19 42 90 CNEL: 21 46 100
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
25 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Walnut Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 11,800
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 724 14 5 535 10 4 134 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.7 -20.0 -23.9 -4.0 -21.3 -25.2 -10.1 -27.3 -31.2 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 64.5 56.3 57.1 63.2 54.9 55.8 57.2 48.9 49.8
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 65.8 Leq EVENING= 64.5 Leq NIGHT= 58.5 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.0
Ldn= 66.9
CNEL= 67.5
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 31 67 144 CNEL: 34 73 158
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
26 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Walnut Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 14,600
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 895 17 7 662 13 5 166 3 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -2.3 -19.6 -23.5 -3.6 -20.9 -24.8 -9.6 -26.9 -30.8 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.9 58.0 58.5 65.6 56.7 57.2 59.6 50.6 51.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.0 Leq EVENING= 66.7 Leq NIGHT= 60.7 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.2
Ldn= 69.1
CNEL= 69.7
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 43 93 201 CNEL: 48 103 222
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
27 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Analyst:NJF
Segment: California Ave to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,300
SPEED (mph) 35
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1184 22 9 875 17 7 219 4 2
Speed in MPH 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0 65.1 74.8 80.0
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow 0.0 -17.3 -21.2 -1.3 -18.6 -22.5 -7.3 -24.6 -28.5
Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.0 57.5 58.7 63.7 56.2 57.4 57.7 50.2 51.4
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 66.5 Leq EVENING= 65.2 Leq NIGHT= 59.2 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 64.7
Ldn= 67.6
CNEL= 68.2
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 35 75 161 CNEL: 38 82 177
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
28 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 15,900
SPEED (mph) 45
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 12
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 975 18 7 721 14 5 181 3 1
Speed in MPH 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1 69.3 77.6 82.1
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.9 -19.2 -23.1 -3.3 -20.5 -24.5 -9.3 -26.5 -30.5 Distance (reference) -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 67.3 58.3 58.9 66.0 57.0 57.6 60.0 51.0 51.6
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.3 Leq EVENING= 67.0 Leq NIGHT= 61.0 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.6
Ldn= 69.4
CNEL= 70.1
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 46 99 213 CNEL: 51 109 235
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
29 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Elm Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Ventura St to Jensen Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 19,300
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 1184 22 9 875 17 7 219 4 2
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -0.6 -17.8 -21.8 -1.9 -19.1 -23.1 -7.9 -25.2 -29.1 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 66.9 58.6 59.5 65.5 57.3 58.1 59.5 51.2 52.1
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 68.1 Leq EVENING= 66.8 Leq NIGHT= 60.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 66.3
Ldn= 69.2
CNEL= 69.8
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 44 95 205 CNEL: 49 105 226
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
FHWA RD-77-108 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
30 Scenario: CUMULATIVE Project: Southwest Fresno SP
Roadway: Elm Ave Analyst:NJF
Segment: Jensen Ave to North Ave Date:
ROADWAY INPUTS
ADT 15,600
SPEED (mph) 40
ROAD NEAR-FAR LN. DIST. 48
DISTANCE ROAD CL (ft) 100 DAILY HOURLY
SOFT/HARD CONDITIONS Soft % A 97.4% DAY 75.5%
GROUND ABSORPTION (α) 0.5 % MT 1.8% EVENING 14.0%
GRADE (%) 0% % HT 0.7% NIGHT 10.5%
LEFT VIEW -90
RIGHT VIEW 90
Distance to Receiver 50
DAYTIME EVENING NIGHT
AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT AUTOS MT HT
Vehicles per hour 957 18 7 707 13 5 177 3 1
Speed in MPH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Left angle -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90 -90
Right angle 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Reference levels (dBA) 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2 67.4 76.3 81.2
ADJUSTMENTS
Flow -1.5 -18.8 -22.7 -2.8 -20.1 -24.0 -8.8 -26.1 -30.0 Distance (reference) -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 Distance (Propagation) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Finite Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LEQ 65.9 57.6 58.5 64.6 56.3 57.2 58.6 50.3 51.2
VEHICULAR NOISE DAY= 67.2 Leq EVENING= 65.9 Leq NIGHT= 59.8 Leq RESULTS FEET FROM CENTERLINE (dBA):
NOISE LEVELS AT Leq= 65.4
Ldn= 68.3
CNEL= 68.9
70 65 60
NOISE CONTOUR: 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
ROAD CENTERLINE DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FEET): Ldn: 38 83 178 CNEL: 42 91 196
11-Jul-17
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
CALCULATION AREA
........................................................................................................................
A PPENDIX G
T RAFFIC D ATA
........................................................................................................................
TRAFFIC COUNTS:
HOURLY ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS
TYPE OF COUNT
Seven Day Volume
STREET
LOCATION
: DIRECTIONAL
: S/O CALIFORNIA
: HUGHES
Interval
Start
Mon
5/15/2017
Tue
5/16/2017
Fri
5/19/2017
Wed
5/17/2017
Thu
5/18/2017
Sat
5/20/2017
Sun
5/21/2017
Mon - Fri
Average 7 Day Average
NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB
12:00 AM - - 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
1:00 AM - - 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2:00 AM - - 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3:00 AM - - 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4:00 AM - - 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0
5:00 AM - - 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
6:00 AM - - 7 4 - - - - - - - - - - 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0
7:00 AM - - 3 7 - - - - - - - - - - 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0
8:00 AM - - 6 11 - - - - - - - - - - 6.0 11.0 6.0 11.0
9:00 AM - - 4 2 - - - - - - - - - - 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0
10:00 AM - - 7 6 - - - - - - - - - - 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.0
11:00 AM - - 5 8 - - - - - - - - - - 5.0 8.0 5.0 8.0
12:00 PM 4 6 7 4 - - - - - - - - - - 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
1:00 PM 8 8 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
2:00 PM 9 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9.0 12.0 9.0 12.0
3:00 PM 13 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - 13.0 14.0 13.0 14.0 4:00 PM 15 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15.0 11.0 15.0 11.0 5:00 PM 6 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.0 9.0 6.0 9.0
6:00 PM 9 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9.0 3.0 9.0 3.0
7:00 PM 8 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0
8:00 PM 5 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0
9:00 PM 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.0 7.0 6.0 7.0
10:00 PM 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0
11:00 PM 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12:00 AM -
12:00 PM
Volume
Peak Hours
Totals 85 41 0 0 0 0 0 120.5 120.5
- - 7 11 - - - - - - - - - - 7.0 11.0 7.0 11.0
- - 6:00 AM 8:00 AM - - - - - - - - - - 6:00 AM 8:00 AM 6:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume
12:00 PM -
12:00 AM
15 14 7 4 - - - - - - - - - - 15.0 14.0 15.0 14.0
4:00 PM 3:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM - - - - - - - - - - 4:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 3:00 PM 80 49 0 0 0 0 0 122.0 122.0
Combined 165 90 0 0 0 0 0 242.5 242.5
Split (%) 51.5 48.5 45.6 54.4 - - - - - - - - - - 49.7 50.3 49.7 50.3 1 TRAFFIC COUNTS:
INTERSECTION PEAK PERIOD TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 48 0 85 6 0 106 5 18 0 57 16 8 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 73 0 109 4 0 160 7 15 0 72 36 9 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 39 0 166 5 0 216 8 5 0 80 31 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 69 0 138 2 0 206 8 13 0 77 26 7 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 57 0 117 8 0 162 19 12 0 71 23 9 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 50 0 85 7 0 144 14 18 0 81 21 14 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 51 0 79 6 0 129 17 16 0 80 14 11 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 51 0 98 6 0 139 13 17 0 68 36 7 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 438 0 877 44 0 1262 91 114 0 586 203 68
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 33 0 112 10 0 211 9 18 0 104 26 7 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 26 0 117 6 0 174 8 10 0 129 17 4 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 19 0 134 5 0 231 12 12 0 122 35 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 113 6 0 212 9 7 0 105 35 7 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 19 0 129 2 0 229 12 10 0 106 25 6 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 22 0 126 2 0 162 9 2 0 106 32 4 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 105 2 0 173 8 7 0 104 26 4 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 23 0 122 4 0 166 4 7 0 100 20 4 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 168 0 958 37 0 1558 71 73 0 876 216 38
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 238 0 530 19 0 744 42 45 0 300 116 28 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 77 0 493 19 0 846 41 39 0 462 112 19 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.912 4.7%
PM 493 0 77 0.931
PM 0.918 3.8%
AM 530 0 238 0.928
PHF 0.913 0.877
AM PM
0 0 116 112
846 744 300 462
41 42 0 0
PM AM
PHF
0.937 0.914 PHF
##### 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
SR 41 SB Ramps
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
Northbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 41 SB Ramps @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.706885°
-119.786360°
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0001000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000000000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0001000000000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001000000000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000000000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000000000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0001000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000100
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000000000
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0002000000000000
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 00 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 0 2 AM 0000 Peds <>
00 AM PM
00 00
00 00
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 00
Peds <>
0000 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 41 SB Ramps
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
SR 41 SB Ramps Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 SB Ramps @ Jensen Ave 36.706885°
Fresno -119.786360°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Jensen Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS
52 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 SB Ramps @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
SR 41 SB Ramps
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 2 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 104 50 6 0 71 27 15 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 8 0 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 135 98 9 0 100 37 20 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 7 0 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 127 128 6 0 104 46 10 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 10 0 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 161 114 10 0 93 37 8 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 5 0 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 132 87 11 0 89 37 14 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 4 0 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 112 82 8 0 98 34 21 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4 0 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 105 75 14 0 90 45 18 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 7 0 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 123 67 16 0 97 51 23 TOTAL 47 0 162 22 0 0 0 0 0 999 701 80 0 742 314 129
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 4 0 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 122 122 17 0 126 129 14 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 9 0 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 103 97 12 0 137 115 8 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 12 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 106 144 9 0 145 109 7 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 12 0 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 94 131 9 0 128 74 12 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 9 0 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 108 140 9 0 122 143 9 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 13 0 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 85 99 1 0 125 79 10 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 18 0 46 5 0 0 0 0 0 85 101 5 0 112 50 4 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 15 0 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 98 91 6 0 105 45 11 TOTAL 92 0 230 26 0 0 0 0 0 801 925 68 0 1000 744 75
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 30 0 89 13 0 0 0 0 0 555 427 36 0 386 157 52 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 42 0 102 13 0 0 0 0 0 411 512 39 0 532 441 36 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.936 6.1%
PM 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.932 4.3%
AM 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.923 0.893
AM PM
0 0 157 441
411 555 386 532
512 427 0 0
PM AM
PHF
0.905 0.918 PHF
0.875 30 0 89 AM
0.857 42 0 102 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
SR 41 NB Ramps
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
Northbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 41 NB Ramps @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.706883°
-119.783606°
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000100000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0100000000000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0100000000000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000100000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000200000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000100000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000100
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000100000000
TOTAL 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000100000000
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0100000400000000
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 01 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 1 4 AM 0000 Peds <>
00 AM PM
00 00
00 00
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 00
Peds <>
1000 AM
4 0 1 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 41 NB Ramps
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
SR 41 NB Ramps Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 NB Ramps @ Jensen Ave 36.706883°
Fresno -119.783606°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Jensen Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS
47 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 NB Ramps @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
SR 41 NB Ramps
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 4 0 30 24 111 50 37 9 0 68 4 10 20 92 0 14 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 6 0 26 14 124 36 41 9 0 89 5 10 23 125 0 17 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 6 0 26 6 160 64 31 9 0 116 9 13 35 124 0 13 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 4 0 36 11 177 83 33 15 0 122 9 12 36 134 0 22 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 3 0 27 9 133 43 45 23 0 86 8 12 24 132 0 28 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 9 0 33 15 100 52 38 23 0 97 9 12 35 136 0 32 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 7 0 43 18 105 48 29 19 0 85 9 11 24 120 0 25 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 13 0 42 19 101 46 34 23 0 103 17 25 8 126 0 21 TOTAL 52 0 263 116 1011 422 288 130 0 766 70 105 205 989 0 172 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 13 0 84 8 108 26 21 32 0 163 8 20 22 137 0 21 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 12 0 49 16 127 31 18 28 0 149 7 17 15 129 0 13 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 17 0 87 15 109 30 26 17 0 161 9 15 25 139 0 18 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 8 0 73 8 133 28 13 16 0 127 9 13 21 118 0 22 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 12 0 107 4 113 16 16 10 0 158 5 11 14 113 0 12 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 12 0 34 7 135 20 17 5 0 144 4 8 14 109 0 15 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 12 0 47 6 116 17 19 14 0 137 3 8 8 89 0 12 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 6 0 30 7 115 19 23 18 0 112 6 10 13 103 0 9 TOTAL 92 0 511 71 956 187 153 140 0 1151 51 102 132 937 0 122 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 22 0 122 41 570 242 147 70 0 421 35 49 130 526 0 95 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 50 0 293 47 477 115 78 93 0 600 33 65 83 523 0 74 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.873 11.5%
PM 78 115 477 0.952
PM 0.934 12.4%
AM 147 242 570 0.818
PHF 0.925 0.87
AM PM
00 00
600 421 526 523
33 35 130 83
PM AM
PHF
0.959 0.924 PHF
0.857 22 0 122 AM
0.825 50 0 293 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 99 SB Offramp / SE Ave @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.706915°
119.776195°
SR 99 SB Offramp
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000100000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0001000000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0001000000000001
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000100000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0001000000000100
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000000000002
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000000000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000100000001
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000100
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0001000000000001
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0001000200000102
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 02 PM 0 0 0 1
PM Peak Total 1 5 AM 0001 Peds <>
21 AM PM
00 00
00 01
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 00
Peds <>
0000 AM
2 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 SB Offramp / SE Ave @ Jensen Ave 36.706915°
Fresno 119.776195°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 99 SB Offramp
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
SE Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE 114 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 SB Offramp / SE Ave @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
SR 99 SB Offramp
Jensen Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Westbound left turns are protected. Northbound and southbound approaches are split.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 24 17 22 17 6 0 40 6 25 147 0 20 0 178 13 14 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 28 10 31 14 8 0 42 12 17 173 0 26 0 232 25 15 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 33 17 22 5 10 0 34 3 32 203 0 15 0 296 12 18 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 29 28 23 8 15 0 28 3 37 239 0 15 0 249 21 20 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 29 21 30 13 11 0 43 9 39 173 0 22 0 253 20 24 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 35 10 21 13 5 0 40 10 22 158 0 23 0 249 19 21 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 20 12 17 8 12 0 42 8 31 143 0 18 0 221 22 25 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 23 8 23 12 12 0 35 7 20 177 0 30 0 212 11 29 TOTAL 221 123 189 90 79 0 304 58 223 1413 0 169 0 1890 143 166 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 38 9 27 11 12 0 72 6 20 249 0 27 0 239 8 12 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 48 9 29 9 12 0 43 4 18 224 0 26 0 208 8 9 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 45 15 39 12 7 0 78 5 21 256 0 19 0 265 16 12 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 47 14 35 10 8 0 67 5 24 210 0 19 0 219 19 13 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 28 12 32 13 15 0 96 7 18 245 0 13 0 232 16 6 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 33 11 20 11 8 0 45 4 21 247 0 15 0 202 13 9 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 19 11 22 7 17 0 54 5 16 230 0 10 0 171 20 7 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 27 5 25 12 14 0 38 3 9 224 0 15 0 165 15 1 TOTAL 285 86 229 85 93 0 493 39 147 1885 0 144 0 1701 115 69 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 119 76 106 40 44 0 147 27 125 788 0 78 0 1030 78 77 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 153 52 126 46 38 0 286 21 84 958 0 66 0 918 64 40 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.939 8.8%
PM 286 0 38 0.73
PM 0.903 6.5%
AM 147 0 44 0.884
PHF 0.94 0.827
AM PM
84 125 78 64
958 788 1030 918
00 00
PM AM
PHF
0.899 0.874 PHF
0.941 119 76 106 AM
0.836 153 52 126 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 99 NB Offramp / SE Ave @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.706803°
119.771753°
SE Ave
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000100010000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0001100000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000100000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0001000000020000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000010000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0001000100000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000100000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0001000100020000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000110000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100020000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000101040000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0002000100010000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0003000200030000
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002000000040000
TOTAL 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 16 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0002100100030000
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0002000411070000
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 16 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 2 13 AM 0012 Peds <>
00 AM PM
10 00
10 00
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 37
Peds <>
1000 AM
4 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 NB Offramp / SE Ave @ Jensen Ave 36.706803°
Fresno 119.771753°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SE Ave
Jensen Ave Jensen Ave
SR 99 NB Offramp Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE 71 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 NB Offramp / SE Ave @ Jensen Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
SE Ave
Jensen Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Eastbound left turns are protected. Northbound and southbound left turns are permitted.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 36 0 60 5 0 40 2 4 5 30 0 8
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 58 0 60 7 0 62 4 7 8 28 0 11
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 75 0 47 1 0 85 1 10 5 47 0 6
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 92 0 51 5 0 85 2 9 8 34 0 12
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 86 0 35 9 0 67 1 11 7 35 0 8
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 82 0 30 7 0 66 5 10 7 24 0 6
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 57 1 39 12 0 51 4 7 4 34 0 8
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 47 0 40 6 0 70 2 5 5 32 0 7
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 533 1 362 52 0 526 21 63 49 264 0 66
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 22 1 29 10 0 80 1 3 10 36 0 6 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 26 0 28 7 0 94 1 12 11 44 0 8 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 24 0 33 6 0 67 1 2 14 68 0 9
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 25 0 38 3 0 78 2 6 11 46 0 5
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 12 0 44 2 0 92 6 5 10 45 0 5
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 30 0 34 7 0 70 2 6 9 43 0 5
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 24 0 46 6 0 96 1 3 8 42 0 5
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 21 0 29 5 0 84 2 4 7 25 0 3
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 184 1 281 46 0 661 16 41 80 349 0 46
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 311 0 193 22 0 299 8 37 28 144 0 37 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 87 0 143 18 0 331 10 25 46 203 0 27 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.903 9.8%
PM 143 0 87 0.913
PM 0.981 8.5%
AM 193 0 311 0.881
PHF 0.87 0.882
AM PM
00 00
331 299 144 203
10 8 28 46
PM AM
PHF
0.827 0.759 PHF
##### 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 41 SB Ramps @ North Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.692279°
-119.786655°
SR 41 SB Ramps
North Ave North Ave
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000000100
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000100
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0002000000000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0003000001000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000001000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0001000000000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001000000000100
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000000000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000001000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000001000000
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0002000000000100
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0002000001000100
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 12 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 2 2 AM 0002 Peds <>
00 AM PM
00 00
10 11
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 00
Peds <>
0000 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 SB Ramps @ North Ave 36.692279°
Fresno -119.786655°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 41 SB Ramps
North Ave North Ave
SR 41 SB Ramps Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE 76 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 SB Ramps @ North Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
SR 41 SB Ramps
North Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Westbound left turns are protected.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 3 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 22 49 0 4 0 32 16 11 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 3 0 11 5 0 0 0 0 44 92 0 14 0 35 30 16 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 7 0 19 4 0 0 0 0 49 122 0 9 0 43 64 9 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 4 0 17 5 0 0 0 0 32 133 0 13 0 35 39 17 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 28 129 0 15 0 43 40 9 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 32 105 0 12 0 31 33 14 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 30 81 0 12 0 32 33 9 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 1 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 38 76 0 6 0 41 39 11
TOTAL 20 1 94 30 0 0 0 0 275 787 0 85 0 292 294 96
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 11 6 0 0 0 0 33 55 0 12 0 49 69 8 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 56 65 0 11 0 46 61 13 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 6 0 14 7 0 0 0 0 39 49 0 7 0 81 78 13 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 3 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 44 60 0 7 0 46 49 8
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 4 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 65 50 0 10 0 56 79 10 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 5 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 36 54 0 7 0 45 65 7
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 2 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 61 62 0 6 0 45 57 8
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 1 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 51 53 0 10 0 33 42 5
TOTAL 25 1 65 27 0 0 0 0 385 448 0 70 0 401 500 72
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 15 0 55 19 0 0 0 0 153 476 0 51 0 156 173 51 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 17 1 35 12 0 0 0 0 204 224 0 35 0 229 267 44 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.845 11.8%
PM 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.915 9.3%
AM 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.884 0.92
AM PM
204 153 173 267
224 476 156 229
00 00
PM AM
PHF
0.769 0.78 PHF
0.673 15 0 55 AM
0.663 17 1 35 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 41 NB Ramps @ North Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.692270°
-119.785180°
SR 41 NB Ramps
North Ave North Ave
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000001000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000001000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000001000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000000000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000000000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000000000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000001000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000001000000
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000000000
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000001000000
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000001000000
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 10 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 1 0 AM 0000 Peds <>
00 AM PM
00 00
11 00
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 00
Peds <>
0000 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 NB Ramps @ North Ave 36.692270°
Fresno -119.785180°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 41 NB Ramps
North Ave North Ave
SR 41 NB Ramps Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE 49 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 41 NB Ramps @ North Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
SR 41 NB Ramps
North Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS WB left turn is protected
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 53 20 10 12 29 0 8 77 17 61 7 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 81 22 2 14 39 0 6 102 38 91 9 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 126 31 5 13 48 0 5 109 43 105 3 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 102 34 7 13 65 0 2 121 39 81 7 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 111 23 5 12 55 0 2 102 31 64 7 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 99 19 8 16 49 0 3 113 36 57 7 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 87 19 6 26 48 0 6 65 37 61 9 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 88 24 6 20 59 0 6 87 32 57 11 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 747 192 49 126 392 0 38 776 273 577 60 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 97 32 2 33 95 0 6 43 42 64 9 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 116 31 7 23 106 0 4 45 30 77 9 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 117 35 1 29 90 0 1 37 67 40 4 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 103 21 2 38 95 0 1 38 49 58 4 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 130 32 4 44 87 0 2 28 61 62 3 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 134 27 3 30 97 0 3 34 50 55 2 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 106 24 3 19 73 0 4 31 42 55 1 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 101 23 3 19 71 0 1 37 46 55 4 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 904 225 25 235 714 0 22 293 387 466 36 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 438 107 25 54 217 0 12 445 149 307 24 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 466 119 14 134 378 0 8 148 207 237 20 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.904 3.6%
PM 0 378 134 0.962
PM 0.951 2.5%
AM 0 217 54 0.869
PHF 0.974 0.876
AM PM
148 445 0 0
207 149 0 0
237 307 0 0
PM AM
PHF
##### ##### PHF
0.868 0 438 107 AM
0.903 0 466 119 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Fresno Street
SR 99 SB Ramps SR 99 SB Ramps
Northbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 99 SB Ramps @ Fresno St
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.730795°
-119.799546°
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000100000001
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000005
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000002
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000010100000004
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000010000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000000000008
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000040000000003
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000100000006
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000020000000006
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000000000006
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0010020000000008
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000004
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000010000000002
TOTAL 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 24 PM 0 6 0 0
PM Peak Total 6 22 AM 0100 Peds <>
21 22
AM PM
00 00
00 00
00 00
PM AM
Peds <> 00
Peds <>
2000 AM
1 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Fresno Street
SR 99 SB Ramps SR 99 SB Ramps
Fresno Street Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 SB Ramps @ Fresno St 36.730795°
Fresno -119.799546°
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax City of Fresno
www.metrotrafficdata.com 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
SR 99 SB Ramps
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Southbound left turns are protected.
74 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 SB Ramps @ Fresno St
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
Fresno Street
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
City of Fresno
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93721-3623
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 32 91 0 8 0 28 18 7 0 0 0 0 13 9 33 4 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 47 145 0 6 0 37 26 6 0 0 0 0 16 12 54 5 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 65 175 0 4 0 33 34 6 0 0 0 0 25 16 51 4 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 56 159 0 3 0 44 38 3 0 0 0 0 36 24 71 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 44 176 0 7 0 41 28 2 0 0 0 0 23 13 61 6 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 42 165 0 8 0 48 31 4 0 0 0 0 15 20 67 3 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 41 121 0 6 0 52 38 2 0 0 0 0 20 11 47 8 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 41 128 0 8 0 60 44 9 0 0 0 0 22 14 41 8 TOTAL 368 1160 0 50 0 343 257 39 0 0 0 0 170 119 425 42 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 56 84 0 3 0 92 84 4 0 0 0 0 28 21 38 10 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 51 113 0 7 0 103 90 6 0 0 0 0 29 17 28 7 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 60 98 0 2 0 88 104 1 0 0 0 0 32 24 46 7 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 35 103 0 2 0 94 98 2 0 0 0 0 33 30 48 9 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 64 96 0 3 0 100 142 2 0 0 0 0 25 25 39 4 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 57 109 0 3 0 100 100 2 0 0 0 0 28 16 48 5 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 58 82 0 3 0 66 71 6 0 0 0 0 19 13 28 7 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 48 75 0 4 0 73 53 1 0 0 0 0 21 10 20 2 TOTAL 429 760 0 27 0 716 742 24 0 0 0 0 215 156 295 51
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 207 675 0 22 0 166 131 15 0 0 0 0 99 73 250 17 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 216 406 0 10 0 382 444 7 0 0 0 0 118 95 181 25 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.935 3.4%
PM 444 382 0 0.853
PM 0.938 2.3%
AM 131 166 0 0.905
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 250 181
0 0 73 95
0 0 99 118
PM AM
PHF
0.805 0.887 PHF
0.919 207 675 0 AM
0.937 216 406 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
SR 99 NB Ramps @ Fresno St
Fresno
Tuesday, April 04, 2017 Clear
Eastbound
36.731294°
119.798822°