MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Policy
T-1.2
M-P1 Sidewalk
Demonstration
Project
Construct sidewalks
along streets
identified in the
high priority area of
the Fresno ATP as a
priority project
Public Works FY2018 General fund,
TBD
Policy
T-8.3
M-2A Street Funding Plan Establish a
development
impact fee for road
improvements
Public Works;
Mayor/City
Manager, Finance
FY2018 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
T-8.3
M-2B Existing Street
Improvements
Program currently
needed street
improvements
into the capital
improvement plan
and construct the
improvements as
funding becomes
available
Public Works;
Finance
Include in the
budget for
FY2019
Capital
improvement
program
Policy
T-10.1
M-2C Construct
New Street
Improvements
Construct complete
streets improvements
as needed for new
development
Public Works;
Developers
1 to 15 years DIF and
Developer
funded
Policy
T-10.1
M-3 Contractual
Assessment District
Establish a
contractual
assessment district
to fund complete
street improvements
in existing
developed areas
to complement
sidewalk and
streetscape
improvements
installed by adjacent
and nearby new
development
Public Works;
Finance
FY2019 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Goals
T-12 and
T-13
M-4 Landscape
and Lighting
Maintenance
District
Engage Plan Area
property owners
in establishing
a lighting and
landscape
maintenance district
to fund ongoing
maintenance of
complete street
and other public
realm improvements
throughout the Plan
Area
Councilmember’s
Office; Public
Works; Finance
FY2019 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
8-22 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
TABLE 8-5 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Mobility Goal T-10 M-5A Complete Streets
Funding
In planned areas
with existing
development,
engage property
owners to establish
an assessment
district to construct
complete street
improvements inlieu of a voluntary
contractual
assessment district
Councilmember’s
Office; Public
Works; Finance
FY2020 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Goal T-10 M-5B Construct
Complete Street
Improvements
Construct complete
street improvements
Public Works In conjunction
with new
development,
upon
voluntary
participation
by property
owners
through a
contractual
assessment
district
or upon
establishment
of an
assessment
district
Developer;
Assessment
district
Policy
T-4.1
M-6 Bicycle and Trail
Network
Program bicycle and
trail facilities from the
Fresno ATP into the
capital improvement
plan and construct
the facilities as
funding is available
Public Works;
Finance
10 years
for priority
network (see
Fresno ATP for
specifics)
Refer to Fresno
ATP
Policy
T-6.2
M-7 Public Transit Conduct an annual
meeting with FAX to
review development
activity and projects
in the entitlement
process in order to
ensure FAX transit
routes adequately
connect existing
and future
residential areas to
key destinations,
including schools,
retail, employment,
and recreation
and to ensure the
establishment of bus
rapid transit routes
along Elm Avenue
and California
Avenue
Planning and
Development
2018 Redirection
of existing
resources;
would not
require
additional
funding
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-23
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Policy
T-9.1
M-8A Establish Truck
Routes
Adopt an ordinance
establishing the truck
routes shown on the
Existing, Planned
and Recommended
Truck Routes Map
Mayor / City
Manager; Public
Works
2018 Does not
require
additional
funding
Policy
T-9.1
M-8B Truck Route
Improvements
Program needed
truck route
improvements
into the capital
improvement plan
and construct the
improvements as
funding is available
City and County
Public Works
Include in the
budget for
FY2019
Capital
improvement
program
Policy
T-3.5
M-9A Safe Routes to
School Plan
Develop safe routes
to school plans for
schools serving the
Plan Area.
Planning and
Development;
Public Works
FY2019 General fund,
$45,000
Policy
T-3.5
M-9B Safe Routes
to School
Improvements
Program safe
routes to school
improvements
into the capital
improvement
plan, apply for
grant funding,
and construct
improvements as
funding is available
Public Works;
Planning and
Development
Include in the
budget for
FY2020
Grants;
Capital
improvement
program
TABLE 8-5 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Mobility 8-24 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Goal PF-2 P-P1 New Park Priority
Project
Construct new park
at Grove Street,
west of Elm Avenue
as a priority project
to serve existing
neighborhoods on
either side
PARCS FY2018 General fund,
Approximately
$150,000 (City
staff will need
to identify
specific
improvements
and extimate
the cost)
Policy
PF-1.3
P-2A Parks
Environmental
Cleanup Plan
Develop a plan to
remediate toxic sites
on and/or adjacent
to existing parkland
PARCS; Public
Works
1 to 2 years General fund,
$55,000
Policy
PF-1.3
P-2B Parks
Environmental
Cleanup
Remediate toxic sites
on and/or adjacent
to existing parkland.
PARCS; Public
Works
2 to 5 years TBD
Policy
PF-1.2
P-3 Park Safety Address delinquent
activity and vagrant
populations on
parkland through
a ranger program,
increased
enforcement, or
additional PARCS
programming
PARCS; Police
Department
FY2018 and
ongoing
Redirection
of existing
resources
TABLE 8-6 Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Parks
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-25
TABLE 8-6 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Parks Goal PF-1 P-4A Parks Improvement
Plan
Develop a parks
improvement plan
for existing parks
PARCS FY2018 in
coordination
with Fresno
Parks Master
Plan
General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
PF-1.1
P-4B Improve Existing
Parks
Upgrade existing
parks’ infrastructure,
landscaping,
seating, and
amenities
PARCS; Public
Works
10 years in
coordination
with the
Fresno Parks
Master Plan
TBD
Goal PF-2 P-5 New Park Master
Plans
Develop a
conceptual
master plan for
neighborhood parks
in each geographic
quarter-section
with the first new
development
proposed
Planning and
Development;
PARCS
Concurrent
with future
development
proposals and
Fresno Parks
Master Plan
Developers
Policy
PF-2.1
P-6 Develop New
Parks
Develop and
maintain
neighborhood and
community parks
PARCS; Public
Works
Subsequent
to future
development
proposals
Development:
DIFs
Maintenance:
General Fund
8-26 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
this page intentionally left blank
MEMORANDUM
DATE August 8, 2017
TO Sophia Pagoulatos
City of Fresno, Development and Resource Management Department FROM Bruce Brubaker, PlaceWorks
SUBJECT Revisions to the Public Review Draft Southwest Fresno Specific Plan This memo describes recommended changes to the Public Review Draft of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (Draft Plan), released May 2017. These changes are based on two criteria:
1. Discussions from the Steering Committee (Committee) at Committee meetings held on June 26 and July 6, 2017. The purpose of the Committee meetings was to review public comments received on the Draft Plan and recommend revisions to the Plan to address these comments.
2. Revisions recommended by the technical consultant team based on the recent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis for the Draft Plan.
The proposed revisions are shown below, with the associated public comment that led to the revision.
Text from the Draft Plan is shown in italics with deleted text in strikethrough and new text in doubleunderline.
Other public comments not addressed in this memo will be addressed through responses in a separate comment matrix and/or redline version of the Draft Plan to be released before the Draft Plan is presented to the Planning Commission and City Council, anticipated to be in October 2017.
Revisions as Discussed with the Steering Committee
CHAPTERS 1 TO 3: PLAN INTRODUCTION, VISION, AND LAND USE Public Comment: Guiding Principles on Industrial Compatibility (page 2-4).
To improve the compatibility of industrial uses near residential land uses, change the Guiding Principle (second bullet) to read:
Restrict the proximity ofProhibit new industrial development in the Specific Plan Area consistent with the proposed Specific Plan land use and zoning provisions and restrict the proximity of truck routes near residential areas to the maximum extent feasible.
August 8, 2017 | Page 2
Public Comment: Guiding Principles on Industrial Compatibility (page 2-4).
Public Comment: Remove truck route on Church Avenue which passes through homes and three schools (map on page 5-11).
To strengthen the outcomes from the upcoming Industrial Land Use Compatibility Study, revise the following language to Policy LU-8.5 on page 3-15:
Policy LU-8.5: Assess the compatibility of Industrial and heavy commercial land uses with existing neighborhoods through the completion of the Industrial Land Use Compatibility Study. The study should identify and adopt long-term solutions to address the findings from the assessment.
Options should include greening strategies, relocation, and amortization. As a part of the planning process for the study, the City should work with the County, community, and stakeholders, such as business owners, to relocate truck routes away from neighborhoods to the extent possible. The study is to be completed by December 8, 2017.
Public Comment: Land Use Map (page 3-4).
The Specific Plan land use map proposes Community Commercial and Urban Neighborhood land uses on parcels on the south side of Whites Bridge Avenue between Marks and Hughes Avenues (see a focused image below of Figure 3-2, the Draft Plan’s Land Use Map). It may not be feasible to develop that level of retail if there is not yet a market demand for that retail. To address this, the Plan will add to these parcels a dual use land use designation (or similar mechanism) to allow Medium Low Density Single Family on those parcels subject to certain restrictions on timing and public hearing requirements, to be determined by City staff prior to adoption of the Specific Plan.
Revise Figure 3-3 accordingly (see page 3).
41 41
180
99 99
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
DANRONQUILLO DR
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
FIG AVENUE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD
HUGHES AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
FIGURE 3-3 Dual Land Use Designation Map for Plan Area
RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT
CMX Corridor/Center Mixed-Use O Office
Medium Density (5 - 12 du/ac)
Medium High Density (12 - 16 du/ac)
Urban Neighborhood (16 - 30 du/ac)
Medium Low Density (3.5 - 6 du/ac)
City Limit Sphere of Influence
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
O
CMX CMX
O
O
O
August 8, 2017 | Page 4
Public Comment: The Implementation Chapter should include more detail in implementation priorities and cost estimates.
At their July 6, 2017 meeting, the Committee created implementation priorities to be added to the Draft Plan. One of the priorities was to “Include an anti-displacement policy.” This policy has been added under Goal LU-4 as Policy LU-4.8 on page 3-13:
Policy LU-4.8: Establish an anti-displacement strategy and an anti-displacement and relocation program to minimize and avoid the displacement of existing residents outside of the Plan Area caused by new development.
CHAPTERS 4 AND 5: DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND TRANSPORTATION Public Comment: Existing and Potential Transit Routes (map on page 5-7).
Strengthen the commitment to prevent reduction of transit routes west of Highway 99 and to better serve the disadvantaged neighborhoods in Southwest Fresno. Reinforce this commitment by supporting the new routes shown on the Figure 5-6 of the Draft Plan, and revise Policy T-7.1 on page 5-25 as follows:
Policy T-7.1: ConsiderWork with FAX to not reduce transit routes west of Highway 99, and work to enhanced transit service along Elm Avenue and Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard to connect to future BRT routes and the FAX and HSR stations in Downtown when there is demand from development along the Mixed Use and Jobs those corridors. Public Comment: Promote and incentivize zero emission buses.
Add a new policy under Goal T-7 on page 5-25:
Policy T-7.3: Promote and incentivize zero emission buses in the Plan Area. Public Comment: Ensure transit is accessible to residents in the neighborhoods (map on page 5-7).
The Plan must ensure that focusing transit on corridors with intensive land uses does not result in failure to provide efficient services to neighborhoods that are not along corridors and looks at alternative first and last mile solutions to allow all residents to benefit from these services. Add a new policy under Goal T-7 on page 5-25:
Policy T-7.4: In order to provide service to the maximum number of riders possible, consider first and last mile solutions, which may include smaller connecting busses or complete street measures such as wider sidewalks, safer street crossings, and bicycle facilities.
August 8, 2017 | Page 5
Public Comment: Remove truck route on Church Avenue passing by homes and three schools (map on page 5-11).
After deliberation by the Committee about truck routes on Church Avenue and throughout the Plan Area, direction was given to consider removal of the existing truck route on Church Avenue between Fruit and Elm Avenues (leaving a truck route on Church Avenue from West to Fruit Avenues). Revise Figure 5-6 on page 5-11 of the Plan accordingly (see page 6). In addition, revise the third bullet point on page 5-12 of the Draft Plan as follows:
The truck routes along Jensen Avenue between Knight and Elm Avenues and along Church Avenue between Fruit and Elm Avenues should be eliminated to avoid passing through multiple residential neighborhoods and schools. The pParallel truck routes along Church and Central Avenues should be used as an alternative. Jensen and Church Avenues east of Elm Avenue should remain a truck routes so that trucks can access Highway 41 and the industrial areas in the “reverse triangle” between Highways 41 and 99. Jensen Avenue west of Knight Avenue should remain a truck route to service existing industrial and future office uses south of Jensen Avenue. Public Comment: Will 6-lane roads be necessary on Hughes at Whites Bridge? (map on page 5-9).
The committee discussed limiting roads to four lanes in the Plan Area. After deliberation, the Committee decided to let the Plan’s EIR traffic analysis, which was underway at the time, make recommendations for the required number of lanes on roads. The Committee did not take action on this comment. See section “Revisions from CEQA Analysis” of this memo on page 18 for proposed roadway changes to streets within the Plan Area based on the EIR traffic analysis. Public Comment: Questions the Plan’s recommendation for enhanced sidewalk design and street tree and street lighting spacing requirements (pages 5-14 through 5-18).
The Draft Plan discusses recommendations for sidewalk widths, street tree spacing, and streetlight spacing. The committee took no action. Staff reviewed and decided to revise these sections to match City standards and definitions. Relevant text in the Plan has been revised accordingly and for clarity on pages 5-14 (along with Figure 5-7), 5-17, and 5-18 as follows:
Sidewalks
Wherever possible, existing sidewalks should be widened through a public easement for pedestrian purposes on the adjacent private property to accommodate a throughway zone for pedestrian traffic along with a curb zone and a building frontage zone, as illustrated in Figure 5-7. This should be accommodated as vacant parcels are developed and existing buildings are redeveloped; buildings should be set back from the back of walk to accommodate the following zones and widths. New sidewalks should also be provided in these areas with widths that are consistent with City standardsthree zones and be no less than 12 feet in width.
Truck Routes
ounty Permit Route
isting Truck Route
UTURE PLANNED TRUCK ROUTE
isting Industrial Land Use
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
HUGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-6 Existing, Planned, and Recommended Truck Routes Existing Truck Route
Existing Residential Land Use
in Plan Area
Existing Industrial Land Uses Served
by Truck Routes in Southwest Fresno
Recommended Elimination of
Existing Truck Route
Recommended New Truck Route
CARGILL
MEAT SOLUTIONS
BUSSETO
FOODS
FOSTER
POULTRY
FARMS
FRESNO
CHANDLER
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
Source: City of Fresno
August 8, 2017 | Page 7
• Throughways Zone. Maintain 5- to 6-foot minimum pedestrian-through zones throughways that are completely clear of obstructions (e.g., tree grates, planters, light poles, etc.) and meet all applicable Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations. Relocate utility boxes out of the pedestrian-through throughwayszone, where feasible. For new sidewalks adjacent to residentialonly projects, provide a 7-foot wider throughway zone adjacent to the private parcel. • Curbs Zone. Place street furniture, including light poles, benches, and trash receptacles, in the outer 2-foot minimum zone area adjacent to the curb. Landscape strips are also appropriate in this zone areaand should be at least 5 feet wide, and 6 to 8 feet wide where landscaped with larger trees. Widths of landscape strips should be consistent with City standards. • Building Frontages Zone. In areas with mixed-use development, improve facades of adjacent commercial buildings with awnings and other pedestrian-scale enhancements. New commercial development should be built close to the property line, with setbacks for wider throughways zones and building frontages zones. Building fFrontages zones can accommodate sidewalk cafés, store entrances, retail displays, and/or landscaping. They are not needed on low-density, residential streets. Acquire public access easements on private property to expand sidewalks and useable pedestrian areas and/or add street trees and landscaping for common open space.
Figure 5-7 Building Frontage, Throughway, and Curb Areas Zones on a Sidewalk Streetscape Amenities
• Lighting. Energy-efficient street light poles and pedestrian lights (e.g., solar, LED) should be consistently spaced according to City standardsevery 20 to 30 feet to provide sufficient lighting August 8, 2017 | Page 8
for pedestrians on the sidewalk and bicyclists in the street; they should alternate with street trees.
o Where the sidewalk is adjacent to the street, pedestrian lights should be attached to the street light poles.
o Where the sidewalk is separated from the street, pedestrian lights should be installed as separate units and consistently spaced according to City standardsevery 20 to 30 feet.
Green Infrastructure
• Landscaping and Street Trees. Plant street trees to provide shade for pedestrians on sidewalks, reduce the heat island effect, and beautify the street. Space trees at an interval distance consistent with City standards 20 to 30 feet apart in between street lights. If trees are planted in bulb-outs or a parking lane, they should be spaced to allow for parking stalls in between.
Install tree grates that are flush with the sidewalk to protect the trees’ roots and are not tripping hazards.
Public Comment: What are the definitions of terms like biofiltration, trench, and sharrow? (pages 5- 19 and 5-21)
Regarding these terms, biofiltration trench (or bioswale) is a place for stormwater to collect and soak into the ground during rainstorms. Sharrows are roads shared between bicycles and vehicles (marked by arrows that communicate the shared lane, i.e., a share-the-lane-arrow).
In order to clarify terms that are not commonly understood, the Draft Plan will have an added section with definitions of terms. The new definitions section will be included in the Final Draft of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (Final Plan).
Public Comment: On page 5-23, “new wide sidewalks” in Policy T-1.4 needs to be defined.
Revise Policy T-1.4 to indicate that widths of new sidewalks will be determined by the Citywide Development Code.
Policy T-1.4: Encourage the provision of new wide sidewalks in new development areas or widen existing sidewalks where ROW is available to provide an adequate and clear path of travel for accessibility, consistent with the California Building Code and ADA. The width of new or widened sidewalks will be determined according to the City of Fresno’s Citywide Development Code.
CHAPTERS 6 AND 7: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES
Public Comment: Concern that the chapter and parks acreage comparison in Table 6-1 reflects the acreage counts in the General Plan of 3.45 acres per 1,000 residents; still counts Hyde Park, and still includes ponding basin parks (page 6-1 – 6-8).
August 8, 2017 | Page 9
Revise this section to show the acreage and parkland ratio does not meet the City’s parkland standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents. Park acreage accounting should not include Hyde Park, the Regional Sports Complex, and portions of ponding basin parks that are inaccessible yearround. This account also should not include Hinton, Bigby Villa, and Pride Parks – although they are within walking distance of the Plan Area, they are outside of the Plan Area boundary and should not be a part of the acreage count for the Plan. In addition, update the amenities listed at existing parks. Revise the Draft Plan language as follows:
Existing Parkland Inventory
Table 6-1 provides information on the existing parks and open space within walking distance of Southwest Fresno residents, which includes all parkland less than 40 acres in size owned and/or maintained by the City of Fresno, San Joaquin River Parkway, and Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District’s (FMFCD) ponding basin parks within or just outside the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan Area (Plan Area). Parkland over 40 acres in size is considered a regional park, such as the Regional Sports Complex, and therefore not included in this table. In the case of FMFCD, only the portions of ponding basin parks that are usable year round are counted in this table – see discussion below. Policy POSS-1-a on page 5-20 of the General Plan states that the City’s parkland standard is three acres per 1,000 residents for Pocket, Neighborhood, and Community parks, with an aspirational goal of five acres per 1,000 residents for all parks throughout the city, if additional funding for regional parks and trails is identified. Using the City’s methodology of counting open space as parkland, Table 6-1 shows that the existing parks listed meets and even exceeds the General Plan’s parkland standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents at a ratio of 3.45 acres per 1,000 residents. The parkland-to-resident ratio calculation uses a Southwest Fresno population of 12,649 people. Note that the table does not include Southwest Fresno’s Regional Sports Complex since it is a regional park and more than 40 acres in size.
There has been extensive discussion from the community about what types of open space meet the community’s criteria for usable parkland, which are reflected in Table 6-1. The community has expressed that there are certain types of open space designated by the General Plan that fall short from the community’s parkland criteria and should not be considered usable parkland, described below:
• Ponding Basins and Ponding Basin Parks. Some of Fresno’s ponding basins are used seasonally as parkland. The Plan Area’s ponding basins (Basin FF and Basin TT2) are retention basins, which are designed to retain and infiltrate water. The community, however, does not consider ponding basins/ponding basin parks as adequate parkland because they have limited amenities and access. The west section of Basin FF (west of West Avenue) is for recharge only and has no public access. The east section of Basin FF has a tot lot at the southeast corner, which is open to the general public year-round, but access to the rest of the basin is used as a driving range and limited to the Fresno-Greater San Joaquin Valley Junior Golf Foundation. Basin TT2’s “upper level” play area is generally closed during the winter depending on the conditions affected by the winter season’s rain.
August 8, 2017 | Page 10
• Hyde Park. The community expressed that open space located on or close to a landfill or toxic site, such as Hyde Park, should not be counted as parkland due to concerns for the community’s environmental health and the limited uses allowed on the land. • The Regional Sports Complex. The community thinks that the Regional Sports Complex is inadequate parkland because it is not within walking distance of most existing Southwest Fresno residential neighborhoods and requires an entry fee.
When following the community’s parkland criteria and excluding the types of unusable parkland previously described such as ponding basin park areas with limited access and Hyde Park, Table 6-1 reflects the community’s parkland criteria and does not include Hyde Park nor the full acreage for ponding basin parks, which includes portions of the ponding basin park that are used for retention, not publicly accessible, or not open year-round. The General Plan states that the City’s parkland standard is three acres per 1,000 residents for Pocket, Neighborhood, and Community parks, and two acres per 1,000 residents for Regional Parks, trails, and greenways.
Table 6-1 shows that existing parkland in Southwest Fresno equals a total of 22.0918.91 acres, which yields a parkland-to-resident ratio of 1.741.49 acres per 1,000 residents. 1.741.49 acres per 1,000 residents is well below the General Plan’s three 3 acres per 1,000 residents standard.
The Plan recommends providing new parkland to increase total acreage. The Plan also recommends as well as the following mitigations regarding that would improve the conditions of inadequate existing parks so that the existing parkland in Southwest Fresno better fits the community’s parkland criteria:
• Increase access and improve amenities at ponding basin parks. To improve the usability of ponding basin parks, the Plan recommends increasing amenities and access so that these parks can function better as parkland in order to serve nearby residents. Furthermore, parkland acreage for ponding basin parks should be limited to the upper and/or middle levels of the park that are usable as parkland; this method of counting acreage will improve the accuracy of the parkland-to-resident ratio. These acreage totals are already reflected in Table 6-1. • Re-designate Hyde Park’s land use from Community Park to general Open Space. Because Hyde Park is located on a landfill, park amenities and development on the land are limited. Redesignating Hyde Park as a different type of land use will improve the accuracy of the parklandto-resident ratio in Southwest Fresno. • Increase accessibility to the Regional Sports Complex. Currently, the Regional Sports Complex is located away from existing residential neighborhoods and has limited walkable or bikeable access. As described in Chapter 5, Transportation, the Plan proposes to connect all Southwest Fresno neighborhoods to the Regional Sports Complex via new bikeways and multi-use trails.
The Plan’s overall land use vision also locates new residential neighborhoods in the Sphere of Influence (SOI) within walkable distance of the Regional Sports Complex.
August 8, 2017 | Page 11
TABLE 6-1 Existing Parkland Inventory Counted Toward the General Plan’s 3 Acres per 1,000 Residents Standard
Park
Name
Existing
Acreage Notes Existing Amenities
Chandler* 2.00
Mini park surrounded on all
sides by housing; located
west of Chandler Airport
Barbecues, Basketball Courts,
Children’s Play StructuresArea, Picnic
Tables, Drinking Fountain
CFD11_TR554
9_04*
0.35 Surrounded on all sides by
housing; unnamed
Benches, Walking Course
Habitat* 1.30 Surrounded on all sides by
housing
None
Sunset* 0.98
Located next to the Sunset
Neighborhood Center and
Sunset Elementary School
Barbecues, Children’s Play
StructuresArea, Community Center,
Computer Lab, Kitchen, Picnic
Tables, Restrooms, Social Hall,
Wading Pool, Parking Lot
Mary Ella
Brown*
4.25 Located next to the Mary
Ella Brown Community
Center
Baseball/Softball Fields, Children’s
Play StructuresArea, Community
Center, Computer Lab,
Football/Soccer Field, Kitchen,
Parking Lot, Restrooms, Social Hall,
Swimming Pool, Wading Pool,
Community Garden, Basketball
Courts
Neilsen* 4.15 Neighborhood park
adjacent to Fresno Park
Barbecues, Baseball/Softball Fields,
Basketball Courts, Children’s Play
StructuresArea, Football/Soccer Field,
Picnic Tables, Restrooms, Benches,
Drinking Fountain
Almy Park* 0.41 New pocket park built by
Habitat for Humanity
Benches, Shade StructuresCanopy
Tent, Picnic Tables/Benches,
Children’s Play Structures
Hinton* 6.18
Just outside of the Plan
Area, but within walking
distance of Plan Area
residences; located next to
Barbecues, Baseball/Softball Fields,
Basketball/Tennis/Hockey Court,
Children’s Play Area, Football/Soccer
Field, Picnic Tables, Tennis Courts
August 8, 2017 | Page 12
Park
Name
Existing
Acreage Notes Existing Amenities
Cecil C. Hinton Community
Center
Bigby-Villa* 2.09
Pocket park just outside of
the Plan Area, but within
walking distance of Plan
Area residences; near Bigby
Villa Apartments
Children’s Play Area
Pride Park* 0.38
Pocket park just outside of
the Plan Area, but within
walking distance of Plan
Area residences and near
Franklin School
Benches, Trash Can, Porta Potty
Ponding
Basin/Park FF
1.47 Owned by FMFCD; this
acreage only accounts for
the portion that is usable
year-round
Barbecue Grills, Benches,
ShadeCanopy Structure, Drinking
Fountains, Picnic Tables, Picnic
Shelter, Children’s Play Structures
Ponding
Basin/Park
TT2
4.00 Owned by the FMFCD; this
acreage only accounts for
the portion that is most
accessible with amenities
during non-rainy seasons;
closed during rainy season
Benches, ShadeCanopy Structures,
Children’s Play Structures
Hyde* 16.03 Neighborhood park near
toxic site; on landfill
None
TOTAL
ACREAGE
43.5918.91 acres
Parkland-toResidents
Ratio
3.451.49 acres per 1,000 residents
* Parks owned by the City of Fresno.
Source: Acreage and list of amenities from City of Fresno.
August 8, 2017 | Page 13
Additionally, include language to Policy PF-1.3 on page 6-11 that includes the seeking of funds for the remediation of the Hyde Park open space, so it may be cleaned up for other potential uses.
Policy PF-1.3: Remediate toxic sites on and/or directly adjacent to existing parkland to improve the environmental health of the community and prepare the sites for other potential uses, with the remediation of Hyde Park being a high priority. Seek funds to implement remediation.
Public Comment: Concern that Washington Union school district does not show enough planned K12 schools to accommodate future population growth (page 6-12).
Revise Policy PF-5.1 on page 6-12 as follows. Note that this policy includes all three school districts in the Plan Area, not just Washington Union.
Work with school districts and public charter schools in siting new schools for anticipated potential increases in the Southwest Fresno residential population and the resulting impacts on school capacity and enrollment. If necessary, assist the school districts with future plan amendments to add new school sites.
Public Comment: The Implementation Chapter should include more detail in implementation priorities and cost estimates.
At their July 6, 2017 meeting, the Committee created implementation priorities to be added to the Draft Plan. One of the priorities was to “create a workforce policy that prioritizes local hiring in the 93706 zip code.” Add a new policy under Goal PF-7 on page 6-13 as follows:
Policy PF-7.4: Establish a workforce policy to encourage businesses and City programs in the Plan Area to hire Plan Area residents in the 93706 zip code, consistent with applicable laws.
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION
Public Comment: The Implementation Chapter should include more detail in implementation priorities and cost estimates.
Revise the “Implementation Action Plan” section of the Draft Plan to include implementation priorities as identified by the Steering Committee at their July 6, 2017 meeting with an accompanying figure (see page 16). The new implementation priorities take the place of the “easy short- term wins” in the Draft Plan. The implementation action plan tables will be revised prior to presenting the Draft Plan to the Planning Commission and City Council to reflect these new implementation priorities as well as any policy revisions that were made in other chapters, described in this memo.
See section on Chapter 3, Land Use on page 4 of this memo for the incorporation of one of the August 8, 2017 | Page 14
Committee’s implementation priorities, “Include an anti-displacement policy” as an additional policy to the Draft Plan.
See section on Chapter 6, Public Facilities on page 13 of this memo for the incorporation of one of the Committee’s implementation priorities, “create a workforce policy that prioritizes local hiring in the 93706 zip code.”
Revise the Implementation Action Plan section starting on page 8-17 as follows:
IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN
Tables 8-2 through 8-67 set forth the implementation action plan for the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan. The actions are organized into five categories:
• Land Use
• Community Resources
• Economic Development
• Infrastructure
• Mobility
• Parks
The highest implementation priority (or “#1 priority”) for the Plan is the Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard (MLK) Activity Center Magnet Core. This #1 priority acts as the “hub of a wheel,” with other supporting implementation priorities functioning and supporting elements of the #1 priority, like the spokes of the wheel. These implementation priorities are also contained in the implementation action plan, identified with a “P” for the #1 priority and “SP” for the supporting priorities. The #1 priority and its supporting priorities are shown on Figure 8-1 and are as follows:
LU-P1 (#1 Priority): MLK Activity Center Magnet Core – Incentivize and support development of the proposed Community College Campus
• I-P1: Underground infrastructure for MLK Activity Center Magnet Core (i.e., sewer, water, storm drain)
• M-P1: New Complete Streets for Church Avenue, MLK Jr. Boulevard, and Jensen Avenue o Restriping
o Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk
o Bike lanes
o Street trees, lighting
o Transit stops
Supporting Priorities
1. P-SP1: Build New Park at MLK Activity Center Magnet Core
2. M-SP1: Trails Network
• To connect to MLK Activity Center Magnet Core
• Other location
August 8, 2017 | Page 15
3. P-SP2A: Parks Improvement Plan
P-SP2B: Revitalize Existing Parks
4. LU-SP2: Marks Avenue/Whites Bridge Avenue Magnet Core
5. LU-SP3: Grocery Store or food coop at one of the Magnet Cores
6. ED-SP1: New Employment Training and Career Preparation Center and Workforce Policy
7. CR-SP1: Create an Implementation Oversight Committee to oversee implementation of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
8. LU-SP4: Prioritize the California Ave BRT / Mixed Use corridor
9. LU-SP5: Anti-displacement Strategy and Programs
The implementation action plan identifies four actions as priorities. These relatively focused measures are intended to be implemented or at least started around the time the Plan is adopted to demonstrate to the community the City’s commitment to the Plan. These actions are highlighted as “easy short-term wins” for the Southwest Fresno community. The priority actions, identified with a “P” are:
o CR-P1: Implementation Oversight Committee
o ED-P1: Employment Skills and Training Workshop
o M-P1: Sidewalk Demonstration Project
o P-P1: New Park Priority Project
The implementation action plan is a framework. It is fully anticipated that, over time, the City will make adjustments to this plan.
41 41
180
99 99
NMX
NMX
O
O
O
O
R O
G
CMX
CMX CMX
C C
C
PB
PB
PB
PB
PB PBP PB
PB
PB
P
CP
CP
NP
NP
NP
CZ
RP
A
PG&E
HOSP
E
M
PB
PB
C
E
R C
NP*
NP*
E
C
NP
NP
E
M
NC
WR
NC
PBP
PF
PF
PF
C
NMX
C C
P
R
CZ
CMX
CMX
CMX
NMX
PF
OS OS
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
DANRONQUILLO DR
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
FIG AVENUE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD
HUGHES AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
FIGURE 8-1 Implementation Priorities Overlaid on Land Use Map for Plan Area 1 1
3 2
4 8
5 3
1 1
5 6 7 9
3 3
3 3
3 3
RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYMENT
MIXED-USE
PUBLIC FACILITIES OPEN SPACE
COMMERCIAL
O Office
Office Restricted
Automobile /Vehicle Sales and
Services are are not permitted
O No Auto
P Park
CZ Clear Zone
NP Neighborhood Park
CP Community Park
RP Regional Park
PB Ponding Basin
PBP Ponding Basin Park
NP* Neighborhood Park*
CMX Corridor/Center Mixed-Use
NMX Neighborhood Mixed-Use
SS Special School
C College
E Elementary School
PF Public Facility
M Middle School
A Airport
HOSP Hospital
NC Neighborhood Center
PG&E PG&E Station
Water Recharge
Basin
WR
R Regional
CH Church
C Community
*The exact location of the parks within the Mission Ranch development will be determined in a future planning process.
Medium Density (5 - 12 du/ac)
Medium High Density (12 - 16 du/ac)
Urban Neighborhood (16 - 30 du/ac)
Medium Low Density (3.5 - 6 du/ac)
Low Density (1 - 3.5 du/ac)
Office*
After 85% of the land in Fresno’s “Reverse
Triangle” is occupied with heavy industrial
uses, light industrial uses are permitted
O*
City Limit Sphere of Influence
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
Implementation Priorities 6, 7, and 9 are not associated to a location and are thus not shown on this map.
G General
OS Open Space
IMPLEMENTATION
PRIORITIES
Number 1
Priority
Supporting
Priorities
O
August 8, 2017 | Page 17
Revisions from the CEQA Analysis
Following are revisions recommended by the technical consultant team based on the recent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis for the Draft Plan. Add additional language to Policy PF-2.4 starting on page 6-11 to ensure that the acreage of existing and new parklands will be adequate for existing and new residents within the Plan Area:
Policy PF-2.4: Meet the General Plan’s parkland standard for at least three acres of parkland to be provided per 1,000 residents for all parkland less than 40 acres in size owned and/or maintained by the City of Fresno, San Joaquin River Parkway, FMFCD ponding basin/parks, owned and maintained by an HOA and publically accessible (no gate), and where there is little likelihood that the use or access will change, while striving for five acres of parkland to be provided per 1,000 residents which includes all parkland counted toward three acres per 1,000 residents, all parkland 40 acres or greater in size, and all trails of any size. As new development occurs in the Plan Area, monitor residential population growth compared to development of new parklands to meet the three acres of parkland to be provided per 1,000 residents ratio. If the ratio is not met, explore additional ways to increase the amount of dedicated parkland in the Plan Area, including but not limited to designating additional lands for parkland development.
Add a new goal and policy after Goal LU-10 on page 3-15 in Chapter 3, Land Use, that addresses green building code standards for new development:
Goal LU-11: Promote sustainable, or “green”, building standards for new development to help improve the overall air quality of the Plan Area.
Policy LU-11.1: Encourage compliance with voluntary residential and non-residential California Green Building Code (CALGreen) standards through the creation of CALGreen incentive programs. Revise Policy LU-8.4 on page 3-15 to include “vibration” in the list of performance standard types on the operation of existing industrial activity.
Policy LU-8.4: In collaboration with the appropriate local, State, and/or federal agency, regularly enforce and evaluate performance and performance standards on the operation of existing industrial activity related to air quality, odor, and noise, and vibration in order to maintain compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods and uses.
Fehr & Peers’ traffic analysis for the Plan’s EIR proposes revised and specific changes to the planned roadway network in Southwest Fresno when compared to the roadway network inputs in the Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR). Based on Fehr & Peers’ analysis, Figure 5-5 (see page 21) and the text under the “Vehicles” section on page 5-10 of the Plan should be revised as follows:
August 8, 2017 | Page 18
In addition to these proposed improvements, tThe Plan recommends a few additional or alternative improvements to the GP MEIR’s planned roadway improvements to accommodate the Plan’s proposed development patterns and capacity. Table 5-1 and Figure 5-5 shows the Plan’s recommendations to key streets within the Plan Area, which are also described below:. Note that proposed improvement numbers 4, 5, and partially 8 are located outside the Plan Area and are recommended to provide continuity with roadways in the Plan Area. These recommendations could be incorporated as future amendments to the General Plan and Downtown Neighborhoods Community Plan (DNCP).
o Additional roadway lanes may be required on the Regional Retail Corridor along Whites Bridge Avenue compared to the planned number of lanes identified in the GP MEIR. The GP MEIR shows a planned two-lane roadway (one lane each direction) on Whites Bridge Avenue, and instead, four or six lanes could be needed depending on the intensity of the regional retail.
o Additional roadway lanes for key connections near magnet cores may be necessary, such as along Hughes Avenue around the Regional Retail Magnet Core and along Walnut Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard around the Community College Magnet Core. o A complete streets approach is recommended for all of the Plan’s identified corridors.
Existing and planned four-lane facilities and could instead be reduced to two lanes if additional capacity is provided on parallel facilities.
TABLE 5-1. SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN NUMBER OF LANES FROM FRESNO GP MEIR Id Roadway Segment
Number of Lanes
GP MEIR1 PROPOSED SWFSP2
1 Marks Ave. SR 180 to Whites
Bridge Avenue
4 6 Divided
2 Whites Bridge
Ave.
Marks Avenue to
Roeding Drive
2 4 Divided – Marks to Hughes
2 Divided – Hughes to Roeding
3 West Ave. Channing Ave. to
Kearney Blvd.
2 2 Divided – Whites Bridge to Kearney
4 California Ave. Walnut Ave. to
MLK Jr. Blvd.
4 2 + TWTL
5 Walnut Ave. California Ave. to
Church Ave.
4 2 Undivided
6 Walnut Ave. Church Ave. to
Jensen Ave.
4 2 + TWLTL
7 Church Ave. Walnut Ave. to
Clara Ave.
2 2 + TWLTL
8 Elm Ave. California Ave. to
North Ave.
4 2 Divided
August 8, 2017 | Page 19
Id Roadway Segment
Number of Lanes
GP MEIR1 PROPOSED SWFSP2
9 Jensen Ave. Elm Ave. to SR 41 4 4 Divided
10 North Ave. MLK Jr. Blvd. to
Elm Ave.
4 3 2 + TWLTL
Notes: 1Based on figures in Appendix H-7 of the Fresno General Plan MEIR (2014). The General Plan MEIR did not indicate whether roadways would have a raised median, two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL), or be undivided. 2 Proposed changes for the Plan are based on traffic analysis for the Plan’s PEIR. Additional detailed notes are provided below. 3 Although the Fresno MEIR shows this segment as 4 lanes, the more recent 41 + North Corridor Complete Streets Plan proposed this segment to have 2 lanes + TWLTL or Median instead.
TWLTL = two-way left-turn lane
Divided = raised median or TWLTL used to separate opposing travel directions; decision to install raised median or TWLTL should be determined based on surrounding land uses, demand for access, or need for access control.
Undivided = no raised median or TWLTL separating opposing travel directions.
1. Marks Avenue: SR 180 to Whites Bridge Avenue. Northbound Marks Avenue already provides sufficient capacity (2 through lanes; 2 lanes onto SR 180 eastbound on-ramp).
Southbound Marks Avenue may need an additional travel lane to serve future traffic demand.
2. Whites Bridge Avenue: Marks Avenue to Roeding Drive. Four lanes are necessary to serve the planned Regional Retail Magnet Core between Marks and Hughes Avenues.
3. Roeding Drive/West Avenue: Whites Bridge Avenue to Kearney Boulevard. Maintaining the existing 2-lane cross-section from Whites Bridge Avenue south to Kearney Boulevard would sufficiently serve traffic demand near Chandler Airport.
4. California Avenue: Walnut Avenue to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Traffic demand can be adequately served with the existing 2 lanes plus TWLTL cross-section. Widening to 4 lanes, as identified in the General Plan MEIR, would likely require right-of-way (ROW) acquisition.
5. Walnut Avenue: California Avenue to Church Avenue. Future traffic demand is at the upper end of the capacity for a 2-lane roadway, which indicates that a TWLTL or widening to 4 lanes may be necessary to provide sufficient capacity. However, right-of-way constraints between California Avenue and Church Avenue may preclude widening to provide a TWLTL or additional through lanes (i.e., widen to a 4-lane roadway). The General Plan MEIR identified 4 lanes along the Plumas Street alignment, curving back to Walnut Avenue just north of Church Avenue. This curve has since been removed through the DNCP and amended General Plan.
6. Walnut Avenue: Church Avenue to Jensen Avenue. Traffic demand can be adequately served with 2 lanes plus TWLTL. Four lanes identified in General Plan MEIR are not necessary to serve traffic demand and would be challenging to implement between Grove August 8, 2017 | Page 20
Avenue and Jensen Avenue through existing neighborhood without further ROW acquisition.
7. Church Avenue: Walnut Avenue to Clara Avenue. Traffic demand is expected to be greater on Church Avenue compared to the General Plan MEIR with the addition of the proposed magnet core in the quarter-section bounded by Church Avenue, Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard, Jensen Avenue, and Knight Avenue. Traffic demand on this segment indicates that four lanes would be necessary to avoid over-capacity conditions. However, this segment of Church Avenue would serve a community college, neighborhood mixed-use, community commercial, and medium-density residential uses in the proposed MLK Activity Center Magnet Core, in addition to Gaston Middle School a short distance away.
Given the nature of these uses, providing wide sidewalks, attractive bikeways, and transit facilities along this corridor in accordance with the Complete Streets Design Guidelines and policies in the Plan will encourage non-vehicular travel for this pedestrian activity center. Furthermore, the Fresno ATP shows that a Class I bike path is planned along this segment of Church Avenue to further support walking and biking. As such, it is justified for the City to accept a lower LOS for this corridor and provide fewer travel lanes for vehicular traffic to maintain and prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes. Improvements to Church Avenue should consider:
• Available right-of-way/curb-to-curb width for existing built-up areas • Plans for multimodal facilities, such as bikeways, sidewalks, etc. • Need for on-street parking to serve fronting development • Driveway frequency and access demand (i.e., higher demand/more frequent driveways to access fronting development would make TWLTL more necessary)
8. Elm Avenue: California Avenue to North Avenue. Two lanes are sufficient to serve future traffic demand. The existing 4-lane cross-section could be repurposed to provide a more multimodal corridor, including the following possible options:
• Enhanced streetscape with wider sidewalks
• Enhanced bikeways (i.e., cycle track or buffered bike lane) • Increased on-street parking
• Transit-only lanes to support future bus rapid transit (BRT) These improvements would support the Corridor/Center Mixed-Use and Neighborhood Mixed-Use land use designations along the Elm Avenue corridor.
9. Jensen Avenue: Elm Avenue to SR 41. Traffic demand on this segment indicates that six lanes would be necessary to serve traffic demand traveling to/from SR 41 at LOS D or better. However, right-of-way constraints, on-street parking demand, and balancing the mobility needs with the City’s focus on supporting walking, biking, and transit to create a multimodal network would make widening to six lanes infeasible. Therefore, the Plan maintains the existing four-lane configuration.
1 Existing Number of Lanes
1 2
3 4
MAGNET
MAGNET
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-5 Existing and Planned Number of Roadway Lanes Number of Roadway Lanes*
1 Lane
2 Lanes
3 Lanes
4 Lanes
# Increase in Number of Lanes
1 2
3 4
5 #
6 7
8 9
10 #
Reduction in Number of Lanes
Sources: City of Fresno; 2035 Fresno General Plan
Southwest Fresno Specific Plan’s Proposed Changes in Number of Lanes *Based on figures in Appendix H-7 of the Fresno General Plan MEIR (2014).
S CLARA AVE
No change in Number of Lanes, but Divided
August 8, 2017 | Page 22
10. North Avenue: Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to Elm Avenue. The 41+North Corridor Complete Streets Plan changed the plan for North Avenue from a 4-lane divided roadway (in the General Plan MEIR) to a 2-lane with a TWLTL configuration. Our initial traffic analysis shows that the 2-lane with TWLTL configuration is at the upper end of the capacity for this configuration.
........................................................................................................................
A PPENDIX C
A IR Q UALITY AND G REENHOUSE
G AS D ATA
........................................................................................................................
Regional Construction Emissions Worksheet (Annual) - Unmitigated Annual Emissions (Tons/Yr)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
2018 105 54 48 0 13 5
2019 38 40 34 0 10 3
2020 4 29 25 0 7 2
2021 3 26 22 0 7 2
2022 3 24 20 0 7 2
2023 3 19 19 0 7 2
2024 3 19 17 0 7 2
2025 3 19 16 0 7 2
2026 2 19 15 0 7 2
2027 2 18 15 0 7 2
2028 2 18 14 0 7 2
2029 2 18 13 0 7 2
2030 2 17 13 0 7 2
2031 2 17 12 0 7 2
2032 2 17 12 0 7 2
2033 2 17 11 0 7 2
2034 2 17 11 0 7 2
2035 1 17 10 0 7 2
2036 1 13 8 0 5 1
Max Annual Emissions 105 54 48 0 13 5
Regional Thresholds 10 10 100 27 15 15
Exceed Thresholds? Yes Yes No No No No
Regional Operational Emissions Worksheet
Regional Emission (Tons/Yr)
Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Non-Residential
Area 35.632 1.337 22.017 0.008 0.208 0.208
Energy 0.539 4.764 3.151 0.029 0.372 0.372
Mobile 25.807 453.812 253.669 2.423 176.432 48.049
Total 61.978 459.913 278.837 2.460 177.012 48.629
Residential
Area 37.923 1.939 31.876 0.012 0.302 0.302
Energy 0.550 4.699 2.000 0.030 0.380 0.380
Mobile 4.302 75.642 42.282 0.404 29.408 8.009
Total 42.774 82.280 76.157 0.446 30.089 8.690
Combined
Area 73.555 3.276 53.893 0.020 0.510 0.510
Energy 1.088 9.463 5.150 0.059 0.752 0.752
Mobile 30.109 529.454 295.952 2.827 205.840 56.058
Total 104.752 542.193 354.994 2.906 207.101 57.319
Regional Thresholds 10 10 100 27 15 15
Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
GHG Emissions Worksheet
Proposed Project Buildout
Year MTons Total
2018 13,504.93
2019 11,597.20
2020 10,244.92
2021 9,997.67
2022 9,750.08
2023 9,458.90
2024 9,331.38
2025 9,102.44
2026 8,951.05
2027 8,797.39
2028 8,630.72
2029 8,545.83
2030 8,482.36
2031 8,394.08
2032 8,351.88
2033 8,225.52
2034 8,172.97
2035 8,160.15
2036 6,565.64
Total 174,265.11
Year 2035 Emission Rates
Source Buildout MTCO2e/Year Percent of Project Total
Non-Residential
Area 1,304.35 0%
Energy - New Buildings 21,289.99 6%
Mobile1 227,407.69 68%
Waste 14,659.58 4%
Water 617.56 0%
Total All Sectors 265,279.15
Residential
Area 1,891.85 1%
Energy - New Buildings 16,693.66 5%
Mobile1 37,904.78 11%
Waste 3,894.47 1%
Water 1,231.89 0%
Total All Sectors 61,616.65
Combined
Area 3,196.19 1%
Energy - New Buildings 37,983.64 11%
Mobile1 265,312.47 80%
Waste 18,554.05 6%
Water 1,849.45 1%
Amortized Construction Emissions2 5,808.84 2%
Total All Sectors 332,705 100%
Assumed Bright-Line Screening Threshold 900
Exceed Threshold? Yes
1 Based on year 2035 emission rates.
2 Total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years based on SCAQMD methodology; SCAQMD. 2010, September 28. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 15. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/2010/sept28mtg/sept29.html.
CalEEMod Land Use Inputs: Full Buildout Summary (Proposed New Uses) Type Land Use Type
Land Use Unit
Amount
Land Use Size
Metric Lot Acreage
Land Use Square
Feet
Residential Single Family 4,221 DU 823.55 7,597,800
Residential Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910 DU 103.55 2,910,000 Retail Regional Shopping Center 403.370 100BSF 37.04 403,370 Retail Strip Mall 1,294.669 1000bsf 138.72 1,294,669
Commercial General Office 2,489.065 1000bsf 114.28 2,489,065 Education Junior College (2yr) 308.493 1000bsf 23.61 308,493 Commercial Government Office Building 16.988 1000bsf 1.95 16,988 Parking Other Non-Asphalt 42.626 Acre 42.63 0
1,285.32
Project Location: Fresno County SJVAPCD
Climate Zone: 3
Operation Year: 2040
Land Use Setting: Urban
Utility Company: PG&E
Land Uses/Development
Buildout Land Uses
Population: Persons
Employment: Employees
Service Population (Residents/Employees): 0 persons
Land Uses Square Footage DU Lot Acreage
Single Family 7,597,800 4,221 823.55
Apartments Mid-Rise 2,910,000 2,910 103.55
Subtotal 10,507,800 7,131 927.10
Regional Shopping Center 403,370 0 37.04
Strip Mall 1,294,669 0 138.72
General Office 2,489,065 0 114.28
Junior College (2yr) 308,493 0 23.61
Government Office Building (Airport) 16,988 0 1.95
Parking Non-Asphalt (ROW) 0 0 42.63
Subtotal 4,512,586 0 358 1,285.319998
Trip Generation
Total Future Cumulative Daily Trips: 224,634 trip ends
Total Future Cumulative Daily Vehicle Miles: 1,806,108 miles Average Trip Length 8.04 mi/trip end
Project Trips and VMT
Existing Daily Trips 32,343 trip ends
Existing Plus Project Daily Trips: 215,196 trip ends
Proposed Project Daily Trips: 182,853 trip ends 535,145,280 Land Use Trips Per Day** Trip Generation Rate
Single Family 26,122 6.19 210,026 76449325.74
Apartments Mid-Rise 26,122 8.98 210,026 76449325.74
Regional Shopping Center 26,122 64.76 210,026 76449325.74 Strip Mall 26,122 20.18 210,026 76449325.74
General Office 26,122 10.49 210,026 76449325.74
Junior College (2yr) 26,122 84.68 210,026 76449325.74
Government Office Building (Airport) 26,122 1537.63 210,026 76449325.74 Parking Non-Asphalt (ROW) 0 0 1,470,179 535,145,280
Total 182,853 NA
*Based on information provided by Fehr & Peers.
**For purposes of this analysis, vehicle trips and miles traveled are proportioned equally between the land uses.
Water Use
CalEEMod Inputs
Land Use Total Water Demand (gpy)1, 2 Indoor (gpy)1, 2 Outdoor (gpy)3 Single Family 953,576,134 398,151,123 555,425,011
Apartment Mid-Rise 181,752,110 141,029,602 40,722,508
Regional Shopping Center 22,983,583 12,167,779 10,815,804 Strip Mall 90,367,774 96,707,226 0
General Office 66,740,759 33,370,379 33,370,379
Junior College (2yr) 24,126,106 12,063,053 12,063,053
Government Office Building 1,209,975 213,525 996,450
Other Non-Asphalt 3,397,567 1,956,347 1,441,220
Total 1,344,154,008 695,659,035 654,834,425
1 Based on water demand and wastewater generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on 365 days per year.
3 Outdoor water used is assumed to be the difference between total water demand and indoor (wastewater) use.
Solid Waste*
Land Use
Annual Solid Waste Generated
(tpy)1, 2
Single Family 7,744
Apartment Mid-Rise 2,963
Regional Shopping Center 2,650
Strip Mall 11,416
General Office 10,902
Junior College (2yr) 1,126
Government Office Building 93
Other Non-Asphalt 0
Total 36,895
1 Based on solid waste generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on 365 days per year.
Electricity (Buildings)
Architectural Coating
Land Use Land Use Amount (BSF)
CalEEMod Paintable
Surface Area
Multiplier*
Total Paintable
Surface Area
(BSF)
Total Paintable Interior
Surface Area (BSF)*
Total Paintable
Exterior Surface
Area (BSF)*
Regional Shopping Center 403,370 2.0 806,740 605,055 201,685 Strip Mall 1,294,669 2.0 2,589,339 1,942,004 647,335
General Office 2,489,065 2.0 4,978,129 3,733,597 1,244,532 Junior College (2yr) 308,493 2.0 616,986 462,740 154,247 Government Office Building 16,988 2.0 33,977 25,483 8,494 Non-Residential Sub-Total 6,768,879 2,256,293
Single Family 7,597,800 2.7 20,514,060 15,385,545 5,128,515 Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910,000 2.7 7,857,000 5,892,750 1,964,250 Residential Sub-Total 21,278,295 7,092,765
*Based on CalEEMod methodology in calculating the paintable surface areas for a residential and nonresidential building.
Buildings constructed after January 1, 2017 are required to meet the 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. The 2016 Standards are 5% more energy efficient for non-residential buildings and 28% more energy efficient for residential buildings than the 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.
Water Demand Calcuation Worksheet1
Land Use
Abbreviation
Proposed
SWSP Per BFC
Proposed
SWSP Per PW2
Water Flow
Factor (gpd/ac)
Master Plan
(Mgpy)
SWSP
(Mgpy)
cbp Employment - Business Park 0.0 0.0 1700 0.0 0.0
cc Commercial - Community 109.8 62.5 1500 60.1 34.2
cgh Commercial - General 0.4 0.0 1700 0.2 0.0
cmx Corridor/Center Mixed Use 96.3 57.5 1700 59.7 35.7
co Employment - Office 195.0 114.3 1600 113.9 66.7
cr Commercial - Regional 63.5 37.0 1700 39.4 23.0
cz Clear Zone 13.9 11.9 0 0.0 0.0
hwy Commercial - Highway & Auto 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
ih Industrial - Heavy 0.0 0.0 1200 0.0 0.0
il Industrial - Light 0.0 0.0 1800 0.0 0.0
nmx Neighborhood Mixed Use 136.3 18.7 3000 149.2 20.4
obp Open Space - Ponding Basin 180.4 21.4 250 16.5 2.0
obpp Open Space - Ponding Basin 29.0 0.0 250 2.6 0.0
orp Open Space - Park 1.6 0.0 1500 0.9 0.0
orpc Open Space - Community Park 1.9 0.0 1500 1.1 0.0
orpn Open Space - Neighborhood Park 4.5 0.0 1500 2.5 0.0 orpr Open Space - Regional Park 134.6 0.0 1500 73.7 0.0 os Open Space - Unspecified 18.3 2.6 1500 10.0 1.4
pa Public Facilities - Airport 2.0 2.0 1700 1.2 1.2
pc Public Facilities - College 23.6 23.6 2800 24.1 24.1 pf Public Facilities 137.4 0.0 700 35.1 0.0
pnc Public Facilities - Neighborhood Center 5.4 0.0 1200 2.4 0.0 pqch Public Facilities - Church 0.0 0.0 1200 0.0 0.0
pqge Public Facilities - PG&E Substatoin 3.8 0.0 1700 2.4 0.0 pqmh Public Facilites - Hospital 5.1 0.0 2000 3.7 0.0
pse Public Facilities - Elementary School 18.0 0.0 2600 17.0 0.0 psm Public Facilities - Middle School 38.9 0.0 2600 37.0 0.0 pwrb Public Facilites - Water Recharge 6.7 6.7 0 0.0 0.0 rh Residential High Density 0.0 17.7 3400 0.0 22.0
rl Residential Low Density 41.4 6.6 1600 24.2 3.9
rm Residential Medium Density 873.8 377.4 3750 1,196.0 516.5 rmh Residential Medium High Density 33.8 0.0 4200 51.8 0.0 rml Residential Medim Low Density 511.8 439.5 2700 504.4 433.2 run Residential Urban Neighborhood Density 107.3 85.8 5100 199.8 159.8 2,794.5 1,285.3 Total 2,628.9 1,344.15401
1 Based on water demand rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on the Dual Land Use Scenario.
WATER COMPARISON
Wastewater Calcuation Worksheet1
Land Use
Abbreviation
Proposed
SWSP Per BFC
Proposed
SWSP Per PW2
Wastewater
Flow Factor
(gpd/ac)
Master Plan
Wastewater
Usage (Mgpy)
SWSP
Wastewater
Usage (Mgpy)
cbp Employment - Business Park 0.0 0.0 1100 0.0 0.0
cc Commercial - Community 109.8 62.5 800 32.1 18.3
cgh Commercial - General 0.4 0.0 950 0.1 0.0
cmx Corridor/Center Mixed Use 96.3 57.5 3250 114.2 68.2 co Employment - Office 195.0 114.3 800 56.9 33.4
cr Commercial - Regional 63.5 37.0 900 20.9 12.2
cz Clear Zone 13.9 11.9 0 0.0 0.0
hwy Commercial - Highway & Auto 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
nmx Neighborhood Mixed Use 136.3 18.7 1500 74.6 10.2
obp Open Space - Ponding Basin 180.4 21.4 250 16.5 2.0
orp Open Space - Park 1.6 0.0 250 0.1 0.0
orpc Open Space - Community Park 1.9 0.0 500 0.4 0.0
orpn Open Space - Neighborhood Park 4.5 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
orpr Open Space - Regional Park 134.6 0.0 300 14.7 0.0
os Open Space - Unspecified 18.3 2.6 0 0.0 0.0
pa Public Facilities - Airport 2.0 2.0 300 0.2 0.2
pc Public Facilities - College 23.6 23.6 1400 12.1 12.1 pf Public Facilities 137.4 0.0 300 15.0 0.0
pse Public Facilities - Elementary School 18.0 0.0 700 4.6 0.0 psm Public Facilities - Middle School 38.9 0.0 700 9.9 0.0 pwrb Public Facilites - Water Recharge 6.7 6.7 0 0.0 0.0 rh Residential High Density 0.0 17.7 3400 0.0 22.0
rl Residential Low Density 41.4 6.6 600 9.1 1.5
rm Residential Medium Density 873.8 377.4 900 287.0 124.0 rmh Residential Medium High Density 33.8 0.0 2800 34.5 0.0 rml Residential Medim Low Density 511.8 439.5 1700 317.6 272.7 run Residential Urban Neighborhood Density 107.3 85.8 3800 148.9 119.0 2,794.5 1,285.3 Total 1,180.7 695.7
1 Based on wastewater generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on the Dual Land Use Scenario.
WASTEWATER COMPARISON
Solid Waste Calcuation Worksheet1
Classification
Category
Land Use
Abbreviation Land Use
Calrecycle
Classification
SWSP
(area in
Acres)2
Unit per
Acre or
FAR
Solid Waste
Generation
Rate
Solid Waste
Generation Unit
SWSP
Estimated
Waste
Generation
(tons/year)
Commercial cbp Employment - Business Park Office 0.00 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial cc Commercial - Community Retail 62.54 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 5,966 Commercial cgh Commercial - General Retail 0.00 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Mixed Use cmx Corridor/Center Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use 57.51 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 4,115 Commercial co Employment - Office Office 114.28 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 10,902 Commercial cr Commercial - Regional Commercial Mixed Use 37.04 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 2,650 Commercial crbp Emplyment - Regional Businees Park Commercial Mixed Use 0.00 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public cz Clear Zone Zero Waste 11.89 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial hwy Commercial - Highway & Auto Industrial 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial ih Industrial - Heavy Industrial 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial il Industrial - Light Industrial 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Mixed Use nmx Neighborhood Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use 18.67 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 1,336 Public obp Open Space - Ponding Basin Zero Waste 21.44 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public obpp Open Space - Ponding Basin (b) Zero Waste 0.00 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orp Open Space - Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orpc Open Space - Community Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orpn Open Space - Neighborhood Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orpr Open Space - Regional Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pa Public Facilities - Airport Transportaion 1.95 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 93 Public pc Public Facilities - College Education 23.61 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 1,126 Public pf Public Facilities Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pnc Public Facilities - Neighborhood Center Education 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pqch Public Facilities - Church Public/Institutional 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pqge Public Facilities - PG&E Substatoin Utilities 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pqmh Public Facilites - Hospital Hospital 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pse Public Facilities - Elementary School Schools 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public psm Public Facilities - Middle School Schools 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pss Public Facilites - Special School Schools 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pwrb Public Facilites - Water Recharge Zero Waste 6.66 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Residential rh Residential High Density Multi Family 17.72 19.5 7 lbs per unit/day 442 Residential rl Residential Low Density Single Family 6.64 3 10 lbs per unit/day 36 Residential rm Residential Medium Density Multi Family 377.38 8.5 7 lbs per unit/day 4,098 Residential rmh Residential Medium High Density Multi Family 0.00 14 7 lbs per unit/day 0 Residential rml Residential Medium Low Density Multi Family 439.53 4.5 10 lbs per unit/day 3,610 Residential run Residential Urban Neighborhood Density Multi Family 85.82 23 7 lbs per unit/day 2,522 1282.69 36,895
1 Based on solid waste generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on the Dual Land Use Scenario. 0
CalEEMod Construction Run Land Use Inputs:
Type Land Use Type
Land Use Unit
Amount
Land Use
Size Metric Lot Acreage
Land Use
Square Feet
Residential Single Family 4,221.0 DU 823.6 7,597,800.0
Residential Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910.0 DU 103.5 2,910,000.0 Retail Regional Shopping Center 403.4 100BSF 37.0 403,370.2 Retail Strip Mall 1,294.7 1000bsf 138.7 1,294,669.4
Commercial General Office 2,489.1 1000bsf 114.3 2,489,064.6 Education Junior College (2yr) 308.5 1000bsf 23.6 308,493.1 Commercial Government Office Building 17.0 1000bsf 2.0 16,988.4 Parking Other Non-Asphalt 42.6 Acre 42.6 0.0
1,285.32 15,020,386
Project Location: Fresno County SJVAPCD
Climate Zone: 3
Operation Year 2035
Land Use Setting Urban
Utility Company PG&E
Architectural Coating
VOC content of 150 grams per liter (CalEEMod default), per SJVAPCD Rule 4601, Architectural Coatings.
Land Use Land Use Amount (BSF)
CalEEMod
Paintable
Surface Area
Multiplier*
Total
Paintable
Surface Area
(BSF)
Total Paintable
Interior Surface
Area (BSF)*
Total
Paintable
Exterior
Surface Area
(BSF)*
Regional Shopping Center 403,370 2.0 806,740 605,055 201,685 Strip Mall 1,294,669 2.0 2,589,339 1,942,004 647,335
General Office 2,489,065 2.0 4,978,129 3,733,597 1,244,532 Junior College (2yr) 308,493 2.0 616,986 462,740 154,247 Government Office Building 16,988 2.0 33,977 25,483 8,494 Non-Residential Sub-Total 6,768,879 2,256,293
Single Family 7,597,800 2.7 20,514,060 15,385,545 5,128,515 Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910,000 2.7 7,857,000 5,892,750 1,964,250 Residential Sub-Total 21,278,295 7,092,765
*Based on CalEEMod methodology in calculating the paintable surface areas for a residential and nonresidential building.
Construction Phasing
5-Day Work Week
CalEEMod Default Schedule
Phase Name* Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Days
Demolition 1/1/2018 4/28/2056 10,000
Site Preparation 4/29/2056 4/2/2079 6,000
Grading 4/29/2079 9/26/2138 15,500
Building Construction 9/27/2138 11/11/2732 155,000
Paving 11/12/2732 1/10/2775 11,000
Architectural Coating 1/11/2775 3/10/2817 11000
Duration 789.8 years
Adjusted CalEEMod Default Schedule - with Overlap (Normalized for 25 year Buildout) Phase Name Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Days
Demolition 1/1/2018 3/19/2019 317
Site Preparation 1/1/2018 9/21/2018 190
Grading 1/1/2018 11/18/2019 491
Building Construction 1/1/2018 10/20/2036 4,906
Paving 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 348
Architectural Coating*** 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 348
*CalEEMod default schedule.
**Assumes duration as 33 percent of the Building Construction phase duration.
Construction Equipment Mix:
Equipment Pieces of Equipment Hrs Op HP LF Total Days
Worker Trips/
Day
CalEEMod
Vendor
Building Demolition Default Default+2
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.40
Excavators 3 8 158 0.37
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 247 0.40
Water truck* 1 2
Site Preparation Default Default+2
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 247 0.40
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 97 0.37
Water truck* 1 2
Rough Grading Default Default+2
Excavators 2 8 158 0.38
Graders 1 8 157 0.41
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40
Scrapers 2 8 367
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 97 0.37
Water truck* 1 2
Building Construction* Default Default
Cranes 1 7 231 0.29
Forklifts 3 8 89 0.20
Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37
Welders 1 8 46 0.45
Asphalt Paving Default Default+8
Pavers 2 8 130 0.42
Paving Equipment 2 8 132 0.36
Rollers 2 8 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Default Default
Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48
*Assumes water truck and two trips per day for the water truck.
GHG Emissions Target Setting - Forecasting the 2030 Efficiency Target 2020 Scoping Plan Emissions Inventory
1990 End Use Sector MTCOe2 Notes
Electricity 96,100,000 Removed Industrial
Transportation 137,990,000 On-Road Only
Landfills 6,260,000 Landfill Extracted from Industrial
Wastewater 3,170,000 Wastewater Treatment Extracted from Industrial Commercial 13,860,000 Removed National Security
Residential 29,660,000 Includes all
TOTAL LAND USE 287,040,000
2030 Scoping Plan Emissions Inventory
End Use Sector 2030 MMTCO2e
Reference
Scenario
Scoping Plan
Scenario Change
Percent
Change Sector Definition
Residential 47.6 38.4 -9.2 -19.3% Residential final energy consumption Commercial 37.2 26.8 -10.4 -27.8% Commercial final energy consumption Transportation 123.1 104.1 -19 -15.5% Transportation energy consumption Industrial* 32.2 27.7 -4.5 -14.0% Industrial manufacturing final energy consumption, Oil & Gas Extraction* 11.6 11.2 -0.4 -3.4% Energy used in the extraction of oil and gas Petroleum Refining* 42.8 36.8 -5.9 -13.9% Energy used in petroleum Refining Agriculture 7.9 6 -1.9 -24.1%
Energy use of physical infrastructure of agriculture, like buildings and pumps
Transportation Communications and Utilities 5.7 4.3 -1.4 -23.8% Transportation Communications and Utilities (TCU)
energy supports public infrastructure, like street lighting and waste treatment facilities
Non-Energy GHGs* 84.3 49.4 -34.9 -41.40%
Examples of non-energy GHG emissions include methane
and N2O emissions from agriculture and waste,
refrigerant F-gases, and emissions from cement
production
Solid Waste Non-Energy GHGs 10.73 9.17 -1.56 -14.54% Isolated the Solid Waste Subsector Unspecified 0 0 0 n/a
392.4 304.8 -87.6 -22.30%
GAP* Cap-and-Trade (Industrial Sectors) -132.4 -44.8
*Cap-and-Trade & new 20% Industrial Measure to Cover GAP Source: CARB 1990 Inventory. California Air Resources Board. 2007, November. California Greenhouse Gas Inventory (millions of metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent) — Summary by Economic Sector.
Source: Pathways Main Outputs Final (Jan 2017). California Air Resources Board. 2017, January 20. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update: The Proposed Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf.
GHG Emissions Target Setting - Forecasting the 2030 Efficiency Target
STATEWIDE SERVICE POPULATION CALCULATIONS
Population
2020 40,619,346
2030 44,085,600
2035 45,747,645
2040 47,233,240
2050 49,779,362
CALIFORNIA SERVICE POPULATION (ESTIMATE)
Employment
Total
Employment
Farm
Employment
Natural
Resources and
Mining
Employment
Manufacturing
Employment
Employment
w/o Industrial
and
Agricultural
Sectors
2020 17,511,810 417,750 25,690 1330860 15,737,510
2030 19,210,760 420,010 25,790 1370380 17,394,580
2035 20,027,660 421,330 25,980 1388630 18,191,720
2040 20,848,900 422,660 26,180 1407190 18,992,870
2050 22,595,640 425,320 26,590 1445270 20,698,460
Service Population (SP)
Total
Employment
Employment
w/o Industrial
and
Agricultural
Sectors
2020 58,131,156 56,356,856
2030 63,296,360 61,480,180
2035 65,775,305 63,939,365
2040 68,082,140 66,226,110
2050 72,375,002 70,477,822
Project Horizon Year Estimate 2040
2040 population 47,233,240
2040 employment (w/o industrial & Ag) 18,992,870
2040 SP 66,226,110
California Department of Finance. 2014, December. Report P-1 (County): State and County Total Population Projections, 2010-2060 (5 -year increments). http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Projections/ California Department of Transportation. 2016. Long-Term Socio-Economic Forecasts by County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/eab/socio_economic.html GHG Emissions Target Setting - Forecasting the 2030 Efficiency Target 2030 Scoping Plan - Efficiency Metric
Year 2020 Plan-Level
2020 Target (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 431
2020 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 10.6
2020 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 7.6 Year 2020 Project-Level
2020 Target (Project-Level) MMTCO2e 287.0
2020 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 7.1
2020 Per Service Population Target (Project-Level) MTCO2e/sp 5.1 Year 2030 Plan-Level
2030 Target (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 260
2030 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 5.9
2030 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 4.1 Year 2030 Project-Level
Land Use Inventory (Project-Level) MMTCO2e 182.8
2030 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 4.1
2030 Per Service Population Target (Project-Level) MTCO2e/sp 3.0 Year 2050 Plan-Level
2050 Target estimated (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 86
2050 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 1.7
2050 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 1.2 Year 2050 Project-Level
2050 Target estimated (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 57
2050 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 1.2
2050 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 0.8 Project Horizon Year Estimate 2040
Land Use Inventory (Project-Level) MMTCO2e 120.1 -58%
2035 Per Service Population Target (Project-Level) MTCO2e/sp 1.8
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Strip Mall 1,294.67 1000sqft 138.72 1,294,669.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 403.37 1000sqft 37.04 403,370.00 0 Single Family Housing 4,221.00 Dwelling Unit 823.55 7,597,800.00 12072 Apartments Mid Rise 2,910.00 Dwelling Unit 103.55 2,910,000.00 8323 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 42.63 Acre 42.63 0.00 0
Junior College (2Yr) 308.49 1000sqft 23.61 308,493.00 0 Government Office Building 16.99 1000sqft 1.95 16,988.00 0 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 2,489.07 1000sqft 114.28 2,489,065.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 9:05 PM Construction - Fresno County, Annual
Construction
Fresno County, Annual
tblLandUse LotAcreage 57.14 114.28
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,856,962.80 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,294,670.00 1,294,669.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 16,990.00 16,988.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 308,490.00 308,493.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1,294,670.00 1,294,669.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,489,070.00 2,489,065.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 308,490.00 308,493.00 tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1,856,962.80 0.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 2,489,070.00 2,489,065.00 tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 16,990.00 16,988.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 11,000.00 348.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6,000.00 190.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 317.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 15,500.00 491.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 11,000.00 348.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 155,000.00 4,906.00
Fleet Mix -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Based on the Dual Land Use scenario
Construction Phase - Based on CalEEMod default and normalized to an 25-year buildout. Assumes overlap of all phases.
Trips and VMT - Assumes one water truck and 2 trips per water truck.
Grading -
0.0000 9,730.579
6 9,730.579
6 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.080
3 2022 3.2214 24.2950 20.4405 0.1050 6.5842 0.1879 6.7721 1.7799 0.1769 1.9568
0.0000 9,977.311
3 9,977.311
3 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.669
8 2021 3.4894 25.9569 22.2751 0.1077 6.6095 0.2174 6.8269 1.7867 0.2047 1.9914
0.0000 10,223.57
79 10,223.57
79 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.91
53 2020 3.8914 28.7198 24.6331 0.1104 6.6348 0.3100 6.9447 1.7936 0.2929 2.0865
0.0000 11,568.11
96 11,568.11
96 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.20
31 2019 37.7934 39.5163 34.1206 0.1253 9.1216 0.7643 9.8859 2.7715 0.7146 3.4860
0.0000 13,467.25
62 13,467.25
62 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
57 2018 104.9187 53.9225 47.6396 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2Total CO2
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 29.72 138.72
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2040
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1,370.45 823.55
tblLandUse LotAcreage 9.26 37.04
tblLandUse LotAcreage 7.08 23.61
tblLandUse LotAcreage 76.58 103.55
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.39 1.95
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 13,467.25
62 13,467.25
62 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
57 Maximum 104.9187 53.9225 47.6396 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686
0.0000 6,556.889
2 6,556.889
2 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.640
9 2036 1.1719 13.4138 8.3300 0.0705 5.3182 0.0337 5.3519 1.4377 0.0322 1.4698
0.0000 8,149.276
5 8,149.276
5 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.153
7 2035 1.4564 16.6714 10.3530 0.0877 6.6097 0.0419 6.6516 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
0.0000 8,162.004
3 8,162.004
3 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.974
5 2034 1.5293 16.7724 10.6387 0.0878 6.5844 0.0504 6.6348 1.7800 0.0484 1.8284
0.0000 8,214.426
5 8,214.426
5 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.520
3 2033 1.6071 16.8498 11.0192 0.0884 6.5844 0.0517 6.6360 1.7800 0.0496 1.8295
0.0000 8,340.546
3 8,340.546
3 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.883
1 2032 1.7180 17.0735 11.5324 0.0898 6.6350 0.0535 6.6885 1.7937 0.0513 1.8449
0.0000 8,382.636
4 8,382.636
4 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.076
4 2031 1.8254 17.1194 11.9852 0.0903 6.6097 0.0548 6.6645 1.7868 0.0525 1.8393
0.0000 8,470.734
8 8,470.734
8 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.355
6 2030 1.9530 17.2484 12.5547 0.0912 6.6097 0.0565 6.6661 1.7868 0.0540 1.8408
0.0000 8,532.556
5 8,532.556
5 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.828
8 2029 2.0815 17.9850 13.1478 0.0918 6.6097 0.1078 6.7174 1.7868 0.1011 1.8879
0.0000 8,617.278
8 8,617.278
8 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.716
0 2028 2.1961 18.0793 13.7696 0.0928 6.5843 0.1093 6.6936 1.7799 0.1025 1.8825
0.0000 8,783.700
8 8,783.700
8 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.392
5 2027 2.3219 18.3185 14.5413 0.0946 6.6096 0.1118 6.7214 1.7868 0.1048 1.8916
0.0000 8,937.183
7 8,937.183
7 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.053
3 2026 2.4357 18.5349 15.3735 0.0963 6.6096 0.1134 6.7230 1.7868 0.1063 1.8931
0.0000 9,088.403
4 9,088.403
4 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.443
1 2025 2.5526 18.7583 16.2210 0.0979 6.6096 0.1141 6.7236 1.7868 0.1069 1.8937
0.0000 9,317.122
7 9,317.122
7 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.377
2 2024 2.7133 19.2004 17.4006 0.1005 6.6349 0.1265 6.7614 1.7936 0.1186 1.9122
0.0000 9,444.604
3 9,444.604
3 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.896
2 2023 2.8635 19.4306 18.5175 0.1019 6.5842 0.1377 6.7219 1.7799 0.1292 1.9091
0.0000 6,556.888
8 6,556.888
8 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.640
6 2036 1.1719 13.4138 8.3300 0.0705 5.3182 0.0337 5.3519 1.4377 0.0322 1.4698
0.0000 8,149.276
1 8,149.276
1 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.153
3 2035 1.4564 16.6714 10.3530 0.0877 6.6097 0.0419 6.6516 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
0.0000 8,162.003
9 8,162.003
9 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.974
0 2034 1.5293 16.7724 10.6387 0.0878 6.5844 0.0504 6.6348 1.7800 0.0484 1.8284
0.0000 8,214.426
1 8,214.426
1 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.519
9 2033 1.6071 16.8498 11.0192 0.0884 6.5844 0.0517 6.6360 1.7800 0.0496 1.8295
0.0000 8,340.545
9 8,340.545
9 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.882
7 2032 1.7180 17.0735 11.5324 0.0898 6.6350 0.0535 6.6885 1.7937 0.0513 1.8449
0.0000 8,382.635
9 8,382.635
9 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.076
0 2031 1.8254 17.1194 11.9852 0.0903 6.6097 0.0548 6.6645 1.7868 0.0525 1.8393
0.0000 8,470.734
4 8,470.734
4 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.355
2 2030 1.9530 17.2484 12.5547 0.0912 6.6097 0.0565 6.6661 1.7868 0.0540 1.8408
0.0000 8,532.556
1 8,532.556
1 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.828
5 2029 2.0815 17.9850 13.1478 0.0918 6.6097 0.1078 6.7174 1.7868 0.1011 1.8879
0.0000 8,617.278
4 8,617.278
4 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.715
7 2028 2.1961 18.0793 13.7696 0.0928 6.5843 0.1093 6.6936 1.7799 0.1025 1.8825
0.0000 8,783.700
5 8,783.700
5 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.392
1 2027 2.3219 18.3185 14.5413 0.0946 6.6096 0.1118 6.7214 1.7868 0.1048 1.8916
0.0000 8,937.183
4 8,937.183
4 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.052
9 2026 2.4357 18.5349 15.3735 0.0963 6.6096 0.1134 6.7230 1.7868 0.1063 1.8931
0.0000 9,088.403
1 9,088.403
1 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.442
7 2025 2.5526 18.7583 16.2210 0.0979 6.6096 0.1141 6.7236 1.7868 0.1069 1.8937
0.0000 9,317.122
3 9,317.122
3 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.376
8 2024 2.7133 19.2004 17.4006 0.1005 6.6349 0.1265 6.7614 1.7936 0.1186 1.9122
0.0000 9,444.603
9 9,444.603
9 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.895
8 2023 2.8635 19.4306 18.5175 0.1019 6.5842 0.1377 6.7219 1.7799 0.1292 1.9091
0.0000 9,730.579
3 9,730.579
3 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.080
0 2022 3.2214 24.2950 20.4405 0.1050 6.5842 0.1879 6.7721 1.7799 0.1769 1.9568
0.0000 9,977.311
0 9,977.311
0 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.669
4 2021 3.4894 25.9569 22.2751 0.1077 6.6095 0.2174 6.8268 1.7867 0.2047 1.9914
0.0000 10,223.57
75 10,223.57
75 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.91
49 2020 3.8914 28.7198 24.6331 0.1104 6.6348 0.3100 6.9447 1.7936 0.2929 2.0865
0.0000 11,568.11
82 11,568.11
82 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.20
18 2019 37.7934 39.5163 34.1206 0.1253 9.1216 0.7643 9.8859 2.7715 0.7146 3.4860
0.0000 13,467.25
37 13,467.25
37 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
32 2018 104.9187 53.9224 47.6395 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686 Year tons/yr MT/yr
20 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 7.0096 7.0096
21 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 5.5629 5.5629
18 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 6.8799 6.8799
19 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 6.9555 6.9555
16 10-1-2021 12-31-2021 7.4767 7.4767
17 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 6.8572 6.8572
14 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 7.3299 7.3299
15 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 7.4105 7.4105
12 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 8.2545 8.2545
13 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 7.3141 7.3141
10 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 8.0726 8.0726
11 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 8.1613 8.1613
8 10-1-2019 12-31-2019 10.1141 10.1141
9 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 8.1647 8.1647
6 4-1-2019 6-30-2019 19.3643 19.3643
7 7-1-2019 9-30-2019 10.9084 10.9084
4 10-1-2018 12-31-2018 38.8479 38.8479
5 1-1-2019 3-31-2019 36.7948 36.7948
2 4-1-2018 6-30-2018 40.0052 40.0052
3 7-1-2018 9-30-2018 40.2738 40.2738
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2018 3-31-2018 39.7143 39.7143
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBioCO2Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
0.0000 13,467.25
37 13,467.25
37 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
32 Maximum 104.9187 53.9224 47.6395 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686 48 10-1-2029 12-31-2029 5.0829 5.0829
46 4-1-2029 6-30-2029 5.0057 5.0057
47 7-1-2029 9-30-2029 5.0607 5.0607
44 10-1-2028 12-31-2028 5.1584 5.1584
45 1-1-2029 3-31-2029 4.9724 4.9724
42 4-1-2028 6-30-2028 5.0793 5.0793
43 7-1-2028 9-30-2028 5.1351 5.1351
40 10-1-2027 12-31-2027 5.2339 5.2339
41 1-1-2028 3-31-2028 5.1024 5.1024
38 4-1-2027 6-30-2027 5.1528 5.1528
39 7-1-2027 9-30-2027 5.2095 5.2095
36 10-1-2026 12-31-2026 5.3202 5.3202
37 1-1-2027 3-31-2027 5.1201 5.1201
34 4-1-2026 6-30-2026 5.2368 5.2368
35 7-1-2026 9-30-2026 5.2944 5.2944
32 10-1-2025 12-31-2025 5.4090 5.4090
33 1-1-2026 3-31-2026 5.2045 5.2045
30 4-1-2025 6-30-2025 5.3236 5.3236
31 7-1-2025 9-30-2025 5.3821 5.3821
28 10-1-2024 12-31-2024 5.5436 5.5436
29 1-1-2025 3-31-2025 5.2914 5.2914
26 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 5.4551 5.4551
27 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 5.5150 5.5150
24 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 5.6865 5.6865
25 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 5.4833 5.4833
22 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 5.5949 5.5949
23 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 5.6564 5.6564
74 4-1-2036 6-30-2036 4.5103 4.5103
75 7-1-2036 9-30-2036 4.5599 4.5599
72 10-1-2035 12-31-2035 4.5783 4.5783
73 1-1-2036 3-31-2036 4.5285 4.5285
70 4-1-2035 6-30-2035 4.5103 4.5103
71 7-1-2035 9-30-2035 4.5599 4.5599
68 10-1-2034 12-31-2034 4.6415 4.6415
69 1-1-2035 3-31-2035 4.4788 4.4788
66 4-1-2034 6-30-2034 4.5729 4.5729
67 7-1-2034 9-30-2034 4.6231 4.6231
64 10-1-2033 12-31-2033 4.6828 4.6828
65 1-1-2034 3-31-2034 4.5406 4.5406
62 4-1-2033 6-30-2033 4.6137 4.6137
63 7-1-2033 9-30-2033 4.6644 4.6644
60 10-1-2032 12-31-2032 4.7338 4.7338
61 1-1-2033 3-31-2033 4.5810 4.5810
58 4-1-2032 6-30-2032 4.6634 4.6634
59 7-1-2032 9-30-2032 4.7147 4.7147
56 10-1-2031 12-31-2031 4.7937 4.7937
57 1-1-2032 3-31-2032 4.6824 4.6824
54 4-1-2031 6-30-2031 4.7217 4.7217
55 7-1-2031 9-30-2031 4.7736 4.7736
52 10-1-2030 12-31-2030 4.8618 4.8618
53 1-1-2031 3-31-2031 4.6894 4.6894
50 4-1-2030 6-30-2030 4.7880 4.7880
51 7-1-2030 9-30-2030 4.8406 4.8406
49 1-1-2030 3-31-2030 4.7561 4.7561
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1227.5
Acres of Paving: 42.63
Residential Indoor: 21,278,295; Residential Outdoor: 7,092,765; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,768,878; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,256,293;
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 348
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 5 348 5 Paving Paving 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 5
491
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/1/2018 10/20/2036 5 4906 3 Grading Grading 1/1/2018 11/18/2019 5
317
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2018 9/21/2018 5 190 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2018 3/19/2019 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
Highest 40.2738 40.2738
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Demolition - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 1,018.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 5,090.00 1,502.00 0.00
Grading 8 20.00 2.00 0.00 10.80
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 2.00 0.00
Demolition 6 15.00 2.00 0.00 10.80
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 21.5666 21.5666 1.3800e0030.0174 4.1000e- 0.0000 21.6013 004
0.0178 4.6600e0033.9000e0045.0500e003Total 0.0116 0.0443 0.0759 2.4000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3692 458.3692 0.1263 0.0000 461.5263 003
Off-Road 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3692 458.3692 0.1263 0.0000 461.5263 003
NBioCO2Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.2 Demolition - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 21.5666 21.5666 1.3800e0030.0174 4.1000e- 0.0000 21.6013 004
0.0178 4.6600e0033.9000e0045.0500e003Total 0.0116 0.0443 0.0759 2.4000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3686 458.3686 0.1263 0.0000 461.5258 003
Off-Road 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3686 458.3686 0.1263 0.0000 461.5258 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.5227 4.5227 2.8000e0043.7300e- 0.0000 4.5297
003
7.0000e0053.8100e0031.0000e0037.0000e0051.0700e003Total 2.2400e0038.8800e0030.0144 5.0000e005
0.0000 2.9994 2.9994 9.0000e0053.3600e- 0.0000 3.0016
003
2.0000e0053.3800e0038.9000e0042.0000e0059.1000e004Worker 1.9800e0031.3100e0030.0131 3.0000e005
0.0000 1.5233 1.5233 1.9000e0043.7000e- 0.0000 1.5282
004
5.0000e0054.3000e0041.1000e0045.0000e0051.6000e004Vendor 2.6000e0047.5700e0031.2900e0032.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9537 96.9537 0.0270 0.0000 97.6280 003
Off-Road 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9537 96.9537 0.0270 0.0000 97.6280 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.7163 0.0000 1.7163 0.9434 0.0000 0.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.3 Site Preparation - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.5227 4.5227 2.8000e0043.7300e- 0.0000 4.5297
003
7.0000e0053.8100e0031.0000e0037.0000e0051.0700e003Total 2.2400e0038.8800e0030.0144 5.0000e005
0.0000 2.9994 2.9994 9.0000e0053.3600e- 0.0000 3.0016
003
2.0000e0053.3800e0038.9000e0042.0000e0059.1000e004Worker 1.9800e0031.3100e0030.0131 3.0000e005
0.0000 1.5233 1.5233 1.9000e0043.7000e- 0.0000 1.5282
004
5.0000e0054.3000e0041.1000e0045.0000e0051.6000e004Vendor 2.6000e0047.5700e0031.2900e0032.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9536 96.9536 0.0270 0.0000 97.6279 003
Off-Road 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9536 96.9536 0.0270 0.0000 97.6279 003
Off-Road 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 0.2448 0.2448 0.2252 0.2252 0.0000 330.2187 330.2187 0.1028 0.0000 332.7888 003
Fugitive Dust 1.7163 0.0000 1.7163 0.9434 0.0000 0.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 17.7971 17.7971 1.0800e0030.0149 3.1000e- 0.0000 17.8241 004
0.0152 3.9900e0033.0000e0044.2900e003Total 9.9300e0030.0332 0.0654 1.9000e004
0.0000 12.5837 12.5837 4.1000e0040.0137 9.0000e- 0.0000 12.5941 005
0.0138 3.6300e0039.0000e0053.7200e003Worker 8.9500e0036.0900e0030.0604 1.4000e004
0.0000 5.2134 5.2134 6.7000e0041.2600e- 0.0000 5.2301
003
2.2000e0041.4800e0033.6000e0042.1000e0045.7000e004Vendor 9.8000e0040.0272 4.9100e0035.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 1.7163 0.2448 1.9611 0.9434 0.2252 1.1686 0.0000 330.2191 330.2191 0.1028 0.0000 332.7892 003
Off-Road 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 0.2448 0.2448 0.2252 0.2252 0.0000 330.2191 330.2191 0.1028 0.0000 332.7892 003
Total 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 2.1293 0.3437 2.4730 0.8829 0.3162 1.1992 0.0000 739.2630 739.2630 0.2301 0.0000 745.0165 003
Off-Road 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 0.3437 0.3437 0.3162 0.3162 0.0000 739.2630 739.2630 0.2301 0.0000 745.0165 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.4 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 17.7971 17.7971 1.0800e0030.0149 3.1000e- 0.0000 17.8241 004
0.0152 3.9900e0033.0000e0044.2900e003Total 9.9300e0030.0332 0.0654 1.9000e004
0.0000 12.5837 12.5837 4.1000e0040.0137 9.0000e- 0.0000 12.5941 005
0.0138 3.6300e0039.0000e0053.7200e003Worker 8.9500e0036.0900e0030.0604 1.4000e004
0.0000 5.2134 5.2134 6.7000e0041.2600e- 0.0000 5.2301
003
2.2000e0041.4800e0033.6000e0042.1000e0045.7000e004Vendor 9.8000e0040.0272 4.9100e0035.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 1.7163 0.2448 1.9611 0.9434 0.2252 1.1686 0.0000 330.2187 330.2187 0.1028 0.0000 332.7888 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 2.1293 0.3437 2.4730 0.8829 0.3162 1.1992 0.0000 739.2621 739.2621 0.2301 0.0000 745.0156 003
Off-Road 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 0.3437 0.3437 0.3162 0.3162 0.0000 739.2621 739.2621 0.2301 0.0000 745.0156 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 26.3683 26.3683 1.5400e0030.0226 4.4000e- 0.0000 26.4069 004
0.0230 6.0500e0034.2000e0046.4700e003Total 0.0150 0.0466 0.0990 2.9000e004
0.0000 19.2067 19.2067 6.3000e0040.0209 1.4000e- 0.0000 19.2225 004
0.0210 5.5500e0031.3000e0045.6800e003Worker 0.0137 9.3000e0030.0923 2.1000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 2.1293 0.2740 2.4033 0.8829 0.2521 1.1350 0.0000 640.5652 640.5652 0.2027 0.0000 645.6319 003
Off-Road 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 0.2740 0.2740 0.2521 0.2521 0.0000 640.5652 640.5652 0.2027 0.0000 645.6319 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.4 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 26.3683 26.3683 1.5400e0030.0226 4.4000e- 0.0000 26.4069 004
0.0230 6.0500e0034.2000e0046.4700e003Total 0.0150 0.0466 0.0990 2.9000e004
0.0000 19.2067 19.2067 6.3000e0040.0209 1.4000e- 0.0000 19.2225 004
0.0210 5.5500e0031.3000e0045.6800e003Worker 0.0137 9.3000e0030.0923 2.1000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 2.1293 0.2740 2.4033 0.8829 0.2521 1.1350 0.0000 640.5644 640.5644 0.2027 0.0000 645.6311 003
Off-Road 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 0.2740 0.2740 0.2521 0.2521 0.0000 640.5644 640.5644 0.2027 0.0000 645.6311 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 22.6815 22.6815 1.2800e0030.0199 3.5000e- 0.0000 22.7136 004
0.0203 5.3300e0033.3000e0045.6600e003Total 0.0119 0.0382 0.0770 2.5000e004
0.0000 16.4250 16.4250 4.9000e0040.0184 1.2000e- 0.0000 16.4373 004
0.0185 4.8900e0031.1000e0045.0000e003Worker 0.0109 7.1500e0030.0717 1.8000e004
0.0000 6.2565 6.2565 7.9000e0041.5200e- 0.0000 6.2764
003
2.3000e0041.7500e0034.4000e0042.2000e0046.6000e004Vendor 1.0600e0030.0311 5.3000e0037.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3497 3.0524 2.2943 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2862 310.2862 0.0760 0.0000 312.1867 003
Off-Road 0.3497 3.0524 2.2943 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2862 310.2862 0.0760 0.0000 312.1867 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 22.6815 22.6815 1.2800e0030.0199 3.5000e- 0.0000 22.7136 004
0.0203 5.3300e0033.3000e0045.6600e003Total 0.0119 0.0382 0.0770 2.5000e004
0.0000 16.4250 16.4250 4.9000e0040.0184 1.2000e- 0.0000 16.4373 004
0.0185 4.8900e0031.1000e0045.0000e003Worker 0.0109 7.1500e0030.0717 1.8000e004
0.0000 6.2565 6.2565 7.9000e0041.5200e- 0.0000 6.2764
003
2.3000e0041.7500e0034.4000e0042.2000e0046.6000e004Vendor 1.0600e0030.0311 5.3000e0037.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3497 3.0524 2.2942 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2859 310.2859 0.0760 0.0000 312.1864 003
Off-Road 0.3497 3.0524 2.2942 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2859 310.2859 0.0760 0.0000 312.1864 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,266.44
96 10,266.44
96 0.8475 0.0000 10,287.63
78 Total 4.4913 30.3701 28.5425 0.1108 6.6094 0.2638 6.8731 1.7867 0.2511 2.0378
0.0000 4,888.102
0 4,888.102
0 0.1610 0.0000 4,892.126
8 Worker 3.4774 2.3657 23.4768 0.0542 5.3105 0.0363 5.3467 1.4115 0.0334 1.4449
0.0000 5,378.347
6 5,378.347
6 0.6865 0.0000 5,395.511
0 Vendor 1.0139 28.0044 5.0658 0.0566 1.2989 0.2275 1.5264 0.3752 0.2176 0.5929 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 5,331.932
3 5,331.932
3 0.6774 0.0000 5,348.868
3 Vendor 0.9024 26.4989 4.5174 0.0561 1.2990 0.1922 1.4912 0.3752 0.1839 0.5591 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8110 306.8110 0.0747 0.0000 308.6795 003
Off-Road 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8110 306.8110 0.0747 0.0000 308.6795 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,266.44
96 10,266.44
96 0.8475 0.0000 10,287.63
78 Total 4.4913 30.3701 28.5425 0.1108 6.6094 0.2638 6.8731 1.7867 0.2511 2.0378
0.0000 4,888.102
0 4,888.102
0 0.1610 0.0000 4,892.126
8 Worker 3.4774 2.3657 23.4768 0.0542 5.3105 0.0363 5.3467 1.4115 0.0334 1.4449
0.0000 5,378.347
6 5,378.347
6 0.6865 0.0000 5,395.511
0 Vendor 1.0139 28.0044 5.0658 0.0566 1.2989 0.2275 1.5264 0.3752 0.2176 0.5929
0.0000 4,743.581
0 4,743.581
0 0.1413 0.0000 4,747.113
0 Worker 3.1385 2.0651 20.6977 0.0525 5.3105 0.0352 5.3456 1.4115 0.0324 1.4439
0.0000 5,331.932
3 5,331.932
3 0.6774 0.0000 5,348.868
3 Vendor 0.9024 26.4989 4.5174 0.0561 1.2990 0.1922 1.4912 0.3752 0.1839 0.5591 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8106 306.8106 0.0747 0.0000 308.6792 003
Off-Road 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8106 306.8106 0.0747 0.0000 308.6792 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,075.51
33 10,075.51
33 0.8187 0.0000 10,095.98
13 Total 4.0409 28.5640 25.2151 0.1086 6.6094 0.2274 6.8368 1.7867 0.2163 2.0030
0.0000 4,743.581
0 4,743.581
0 0.1413 0.0000 4,747.113
0 Worker 3.1385 2.0651 20.6977 0.0525 5.3105 0.0352 5.3456 1.4115 0.0324 1.4439
0.0000 9,920.168
8 9,920.168
8 0.7795 0.0000 9,939.655
7 Total 3.6137 26.2064 22.4259 0.1069 6.6348 0.1636 6.7984 1.7936 0.1553 1.9489
0.0000 4,613.778
0 4,613.778
0 0.1236 0.0000 4,616.868
6 Worker 2.8784 1.8257 18.5327 0.0511 5.3308 0.0343 5.3651 1.4169 0.0316 1.4485
0.0000 5,306.390
8 5,306.390
8 0.6559 0.0000 5,322.787
1 Vendor 0.7353 24.3807 3.8933 0.0558 1.3040 0.1294 1.4333 0.3767 0.1237 0.5004 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4091 303.4091 0.0740 0.0000 305.2596 003
Off-Road 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4091 303.4091 0.0740 0.0000 305.2596 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,075.51
33 10,075.51
33 0.8187 0.0000 10,095.98
13 Total 4.0409 28.5640 25.2151 0.1086 6.6094 0.2274 6.8368 1.7867 0.2163 2.0030
3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 9,920.168
8 9,920.168
8 0.7795 0.0000 9,939.655
7 Total 3.6137 26.2064 22.4259 0.1069 6.6348 0.1636 6.7984 1.7936 0.1553 1.9489
0.0000 4,613.778
0 4,613.778
0 0.1236 0.0000 4,616.868
6 Worker 2.8784 1.8257 18.5327 0.0511 5.3308 0.0343 5.3651 1.4169 0.0316 1.4485
0.0000 5,306.390
8 5,306.390
8 0.6559 0.0000 5,322.787
1 Vendor 0.7353 24.3807 3.8933 0.0558 1.3040 0.1294 1.4333 0.3767 0.1237 0.5004 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4087 303.4087 0.0740 0.0000 305.2592 003
Off-Road 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4087 303.4087 0.0740 0.0000 305.2592 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 9,675.024
7 9,675.024
7 0.7414 0.0000 9,693.559
9 Total 3.2414 23.6820 20.1121 0.1042 6.6095 0.0923 6.7017 1.7867 0.0871 1.8738
0.0000 4,438.665
1 4,438.665
1 0.1096 0.0000 4,441.405
0 Worker 2.6491 1.6182 16.7506 0.0491 5.3105 0.0331 5.3435 1.4115 0.0304 1.4419
0.0000 5,236.359
6 5,236.359
6 0.6318 0.0000 5,252.155
0 Vendor 0.5922 22.0638 3.3615 0.0551 1.2990 0.0592 1.3582 0.3753 0.0567 0.4319 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2867 302.2867 0.0729 0.0000 304.1099 003
Off-Road 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2867 302.2867 0.0729 0.0000 304.1099 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,675.024
7 9,675.024
7 0.7414 0.0000 9,693.559
9 Total 3.2414 23.6820 20.1121 0.1042 6.6095 0.0923 6.7017 1.7867 0.0871 1.8738
0.0000 4,438.665
1 4,438.665
1 0.1096 0.0000 4,441.405
0 Worker 2.6491 1.6182 16.7506 0.0491 5.3105 0.0331 5.3435 1.4115 0.0304 1.4419
0.0000 5,236.359
6 5,236.359
6 0.6318 0.0000 5,252.155
0 Vendor 0.5922 22.0638 3.3615 0.0551 1.2990 0.0592 1.3582 0.3753 0.0567 0.4319 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2863 302.2863 0.0729 0.0000 304.1095 003
Off-Road 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2863 302.2863 0.0729 0.0000 304.1095 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,429.336
8 9,429.336
8 0.7079 0.0000 9,447.033
3 Total 2.9996 22.2650 18.3132 0.1015 6.5842 0.0827 6.6669 1.7799 0.0780 1.8579
0.0000 4,262.834
5 4,262.834
5 0.0974 0.0000 4,265.269
0 Worker 2.4506 1.4391 15.2126 0.0472 5.2901 0.0320 5.3221 1.4061 0.0294 1.4355
0.0000 5,166.502
3 5,166.502
3 0.6105 0.0000 5,181.764
3 Vendor 0.5490 20.8258 3.1006 0.0543 1.2941 0.0507 1.3448 0.3738 0.0485 0.4224 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2428 301.2428 0.0722 0.0000 303.0471 003
Off-Road 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2428 301.2428 0.0722 0.0000 303.0471 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3462 301.3462 0.0717 0.0000 303.1383 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,429.336
8 9,429.336
8 0.7079 0.0000 9,447.033
3 Total 2.9996 22.2650 18.3132 0.1015 6.5842 0.0827 6.6669 1.7799 0.0780 1.8579
0.0000 4,262.834
5 4,262.834
5 0.0974 0.0000 4,265.269
0 Worker 2.4506 1.4391 15.2126 0.0472 5.2901 0.0320 5.3221 1.4061 0.0294 1.4355
0.0000 5,166.502
3 5,166.502
3 0.6105 0.0000 5,181.764
3 Vendor 0.5490 20.8258 3.1006 0.0543 1.2941 0.0507 1.3448 0.3738 0.0485 0.4224 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2425 301.2425 0.0722 0.0000 303.0467 003
Off-Road 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2425 301.2425 0.0722 0.0000 303.0467 003
Total 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3458 301.3458 0.0717 0.0000 303.1380 003
Off-Road 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3458 301.3458 0.0717 0.0000 303.1380 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,143.258
1 9,143.258
1 0.5000 0.0000 9,155.757
9 Total 2.6591 17.5606 16.4058 0.0984 6.5842 0.0467 6.6309 1.7799 0.0436 1.8235
0.0000 4,102.984
4 4,102.984
4 0.0869 0.0000 4,105.156
4 Worker 2.2828 1.2879 13.8891 0.0454 5.2901 0.0312 5.3213 1.4061 0.0287 1.4347
0.0000 5,040.273
7 5,040.273
7 0.4131 0.0000 5,050.601
5 Vendor 0.3763 16.2727 2.5167 0.0530 1.2941 0.0156 1.3097 0.3738 0.0149 0.3888 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3462 301.3462 0.0717 0.0000 303.1383 003
Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 003
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,143.258
1 9,143.258
1 0.5000 0.0000 9,155.757
9 Total 2.6591 17.5606 16.4058 0.0984 6.5842 0.0467 6.6309 1.7799 0.0436 1.8235
0.0000 4,102.984
4 4,102.984
4 0.0869 0.0000 4,105.156
4 Worker 2.2828 1.2879 13.8891 0.0454 5.2901 0.0312 5.3213 1.4061 0.0287 1.4347
0.0000 5,040.273
7 5,040.273
7 0.4131 0.0000 5,050.601
5 Vendor 0.3763 16.2727 2.5167 0.0530 1.2941 0.0156 1.3097 0.3738 0.0149 0.3888 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 003
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,013.400
4 9,013.400
4 0.4984 0.0000 9,025.859
3 Total 2.5205 17.4393 15.2827 0.0969 6.6349 0.0462 6.6810 1.7936 0.0431 1.8367
0.0000 3,973.020
5 3,973.020
5 0.0784 0.0000 3,974.979
5 Worker 2.1515 1.1661 12.8707 0.0439 5.3308 0.0306 5.3614 1.4169 0.0282 1.4451
0.0000 5,040.379
9 5,040.379
9 0.4200 0.0000 5,050.879
8 Vendor 0.3691 16.2732 2.4120 0.0530 1.3041 0.0156 1.3196 0.3767 0.0149 0.3916 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,013.400
4 9,013.400
4 0.4984 0.0000 9,025.859
3 Total 2.5205 17.4393 15.2827 0.0969 6.6349 0.0462 6.6810 1.7936 0.0431 1.8367
0.0000 3,973.020
5 3,973.020
5 0.0784 0.0000 3,974.979
5 Worker 2.1515 1.1661 12.8707 0.0439 5.3308 0.0306 5.3614 1.4169 0.0282 1.4451
0.0000 5,040.379
9 5,040.379
9 0.4200 0.0000 5,050.879
8 Vendor 0.3691 16.2732 2.4120 0.0530 1.3041 0.0156 1.3196 0.3767 0.0149 0.3916 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,785.748
5 8,785.748
5 0.4904 0.0000 8,798.009
6 Total 2.3742 17.1311 14.1220 0.0944 6.6096 0.0452 6.6548 1.7868 0.0422 1.8289
0.0000 3,800.343
9 3,800.343
9 0.0703 0.0000 3,802.101
3 Worker 2.0149 1.0494 11.8137 0.0420 5.3105 0.0299 5.3404 1.4115 0.0275 1.4390
0.0000 4,985.404
6 4,985.404
6 0.4201 0.0000 4,995.908
2 Vendor 0.3593 16.0816 2.3082 0.0524 1.2991 0.0153 1.3144 0.3753 0.0147 0.3899 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2026
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,785.748
5 8,785.748
5 0.4904 0.0000 8,798.009
6 Total 2.3742 17.1311 14.1220 0.0944 6.6096 0.0452 6.6548 1.7868 0.0422 1.8289
0.0000 3,800.343
9 3,800.343
9 0.0703 0.0000 3,802.101
3 Worker 2.0149 1.0494 11.8137 0.0420 5.3105 0.0299 5.3404 1.4115 0.0275 1.4390
0.0000 4,985.404
6 4,985.404
6 0.4201 0.0000 4,995.908
2 Vendor 0.3593 16.0816 2.3082 0.0524 1.2991 0.0153 1.3144 0.3753 0.0147 0.3899 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,634.528
9 8,634.528
9 0.4836 0.0000 8,646.619
8 Total 2.2573 16.9076 13.2744 0.0928 6.6096 0.0445 6.6541 1.7868 0.0415 1.8283
0.0000 3,681.273
2 3,681.273
2 0.0645 0.0000 3,682.885
2 Worker 1.9053 0.9571 11.0428 0.0407 5.3105 0.0294 5.3399 1.4115 0.0271 1.4385
0.0000 4,953.255
6 4,953.255
6 0.4192 0.0000 4,963.734
5 Vendor 0.3520 15.9506 2.2317 0.0521 1.2991 0.0151 1.3143 0.3753 0.0145 0.3898 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 4,925.320
9 4,925.320
9 0.4180 0.0000 4,935.770
7 Vendor 0.3459 15.8184 2.1706 0.0518 1.2992 0.0149 1.3141 0.3753 0.0143 0.3896 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2027
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,634.528
9 8,634.528
9 0.4836 0.0000 8,646.619
8 Total 2.2573 16.9076 13.2744 0.0928 6.6096 0.0445 6.6541 1.7868 0.0415 1.8283
0.0000 3,681.273
2 3,681.273
2 0.0645 0.0000 3,682.885
2 Worker 1.9053 0.9571 11.0428 0.0407 5.3105 0.0294 5.3399 1.4115 0.0271 1.4385
0.0000 4,953.255
6 4,953.255
6 0.4192 0.0000 4,963.734
5 Vendor 0.3520 15.9506 2.2317 0.0521 1.2991 0.0151 1.3143 0.3753 0.0145 0.3898
0.0000 3,555.725
0 3,555.725
0 0.0585 0.0000 3,557.188
3 Worker 1.7976 0.8729 10.2717 0.0393 5.3105 0.0280 5.3384 1.4115 0.0258 1.4372
0.0000 4,925.320
9 4,925.320
9 0.4180 0.0000 4,935.770
7 Vendor 0.3459 15.8184 2.1706 0.0518 1.2992 0.0149 1.3141 0.3753 0.0143 0.3896 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,481.045
9 8,481.045
9 0.4765 0.0000 8,492.959
0 Total 2.1435 16.6912 12.4423 0.0911 6.6096 0.0429 6.6525 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
0.0000 3,555.725
0 3,555.725
0 0.0585 0.0000 3,557.188
3 Worker 1.7976 0.8729 10.2717 0.0393 5.3105 0.0280 5.3384 1.4115 0.0258 1.4372
0.0000 8,315.783
5 8,315.783
5 0.4666 0.0000 8,327.448
9 Total 2.0184 16.4582 11.6786 0.0893 6.5843 0.0407 6.6250 1.7799 0.0380 1.8179
0.0000 3,431.334
3 3,431.334
3 0.0532 0.0000 3,432.665
0 Worker 1.6786 0.7949 9.5627 0.0379 5.2901 0.0260 5.3161 1.4061 0.0239 1.4300
0.0000 4,884.449
2 4,884.449
2 0.4134 0.0000 4,894.783
9 Vendor 0.3398 15.6633 2.1158 0.0514 1.2942 0.0147 1.3089 0.3739 0.0141 0.3880 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 003
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2028
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,481.045
9 8,481.045
9 0.4765 0.0000 8,492.959
0 Total 2.1435 16.6912 12.4423 0.0911 6.6096 0.0429 6.6525 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
3.5 Building Construction - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 8,315.783
5 8,315.783
5 0.4666 0.0000 8,327.448
9 Total 2.0184 16.4582 11.6786 0.0893 6.5843 0.0407 6.6250 1.7799 0.0380 1.8179
0.0000 3,431.334
3 3,431.334
3 0.0532 0.0000 3,432.665
0 Worker 1.6786 0.7949 9.5627 0.0379 5.2901 0.0260 5.3161 1.4061 0.0239 1.4300
0.0000 4,884.449
2 4,884.449
2 0.4134 0.0000 4,894.783
9 Vendor 0.3398 15.6633 2.1158 0.0514 1.2942 0.0147 1.3089 0.3739 0.0141 0.3880 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 003
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 8,229.901
6 8,229.901
6 0.4598 0.0000 8,241.395
3 Total 1.9030 16.3577 11.0487 0.0883 6.6097 0.0389 6.6486 1.7868 0.0364 1.8232
0.0000 3,346.140
3 3,346.140
3 0.0487 0.0000 3,347.357
3 Worker 1.5664 0.7296 8.9666 0.0370 5.3105 0.0243 5.3348 1.4115 0.0224 1.4339
0.0000 4,883.761
3 4,883.761
3 0.4111 0.0000 4,894.038
0 Vendor 0.3366 15.6281 2.0821 0.0514 1.2992 0.0146 1.3138 0.3753 0.0140 0.3893 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2030
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,229.901
6 8,229.901
6 0.4598 0.0000 8,241.395
3 Total 1.9030 16.3577 11.0487 0.0883 6.6097 0.0389 6.6486 1.7868 0.0364 1.8232
0.0000 3,346.140
3 3,346.140
3 0.0487 0.0000 3,347.357
3 Worker 1.5664 0.7296 8.9666 0.0370 5.3105 0.0243 5.3348 1.4115 0.0224 1.4339
0.0000 4,883.761
3 4,883.761
3 0.4111 0.0000 4,894.038
0 Vendor 0.3366 15.6281 2.0821 0.0514 1.2992 0.0146 1.3138 0.3753 0.0140 0.3893 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,127.701
2 8,127.701
2 0.4511 0.0000 8,138.977
9 Total 1.7822 16.2129 10.4462 0.0872 6.6097 0.0371 6.6468 1.7868 0.0347 1.8215
0.0000 3,259.261
4 3,259.261
4 0.0444 0.0000 3,260.372
5 Worker 1.4491 0.6676 8.3963 0.0360 5.3105 0.0227 5.3331 1.4115 0.0209 1.4323
0.0000 4,868.439
8 4,868.439
8 0.4066 0.0000 4,878.605
4 Vendor 0.3331 15.5453 2.0499 0.0512 1.2992 0.0145 1.3137 0.3753 0.0138 0.3892 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2031
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,127.701
2 8,127.701
2 0.4511 0.0000 8,138.977
9 Total 1.7822 16.2129 10.4462 0.0872 6.6097 0.0371 6.6468 1.7868 0.0347 1.8215
0.0000 3,259.261
4 3,259.261
4 0.0444 0.0000 3,260.372
5 Worker 1.4491 0.6676 8.3963 0.0360 5.3105 0.0227 5.3331 1.4115 0.0209 1.4323
0.0000 4,868.439
8 4,868.439
8 0.4066 0.0000 4,878.605
4 Vendor 0.3331 15.5453 2.0499 0.0512 1.2992 0.0145 1.3137 0.3753 0.0138 0.3892 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,039.602
7 8,039.602
7 0.4438 0.0000 8,050.698
7 Total 1.6546 16.0839 9.8767 0.0862 6.6097 0.0355 6.6451 1.7868 0.0332 1.8200
0.0000 3,182.833
8 3,182.833
8 0.0405 0.0000 3,183.845
8 Worker 1.3242 0.6091 7.8513 0.0351 5.3105 0.0211 5.3316 1.4115 0.0195 1.4309
0.0000 4,856.769
0 4,856.769
0 0.4034 0.0000 4,866.852
9 Vendor 0.3304 15.4748 2.0254 0.0511 1.2992 0.0143 1.3136 0.3753 0.0137 0.3890 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Total 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3479 344.3479 0.0138 0.0000 344.6933 003
Off-Road 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3479 344.3479 0.0138 0.0000 344.6933 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2032
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,039.602
7 8,039.602
7 0.4438 0.0000 8,050.698
7 Total 1.6546 16.0839 9.8767 0.0862 6.6097 0.0355 6.6451 1.7868 0.0332 1.8200
0.0000 3,182.833
8 3,182.833
8 0.0405 0.0000 3,183.845
8 Worker 1.3242 0.6091 7.8513 0.0351 5.3105 0.0211 5.3316 1.4115 0.0195 1.4309
0.0000 4,856.769
0 4,856.769
0 0.4034 0.0000 4,866.852
9 Vendor 0.3304 15.4748 2.0254 0.0511 1.2992 0.0143 1.3136 0.3753 0.0137 0.3890 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3475 344.3475 0.0138 0.0000 344.6929 003
Off-Road 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3475 344.3475 0.0138 0.0000 344.6929 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,996.198
3 7,996.198
3 0.4397 0.0000 8,007.189
8 Total 1.5465 16.0341 9.4158 0.0857 6.6350 0.0341 6.6691 1.7937 0.0318 1.8255
0.0000 3,128.019
5 3,128.019
5 0.0372 0.0000 3,128.949
2 Worker 1.2170 0.5609 7.4013 0.0345 5.3308 0.0198 5.3506 1.4169 0.0182 1.4351
0.0000 4,868.178
9 4,868.178
9 0.4025 0.0000 4,878.240
6 Vendor 0.3295 15.4731 2.0145 0.0512 1.3042 0.0143 1.3185 0.3768 0.0136 0.3904 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2033
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,996.198
3 7,996.198
3 0.4397 0.0000 8,007.189
8 Total 1.5465 16.0341 9.4158 0.0857 6.6350 0.0341 6.6691 1.7937 0.0318 1.8255
0.0000 3,128.019
5 3,128.019
5 0.0372 0.0000 3,128.949
2 Worker 1.2170 0.5609 7.4013 0.0345 5.3308 0.0198 5.3506 1.4169 0.0182 1.4351
0.0000 4,868.178
9 4,868.178
9 0.4025 0.0000 4,878.240
6 Vendor 0.3295 15.4731 2.0145 0.0512 1.3042 0.0143 1.3185 0.3768 0.0136 0.3904 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,872.707
2 7,872.707
2 0.4301 0.0000 7,883.458
3 Total 1.4369 15.8183 8.9187 0.0844 6.5844 0.0324 6.6168 1.7800 0.0303 1.8103
0.0000 3,046.421
1 3,046.421
1 0.0340 0.0000 3,047.270
3 Worker 1.1115 0.5142 6.9333 0.0336 5.2901 0.0184 5.3085 1.4061 0.0169 1.4229
0.0000 4,826.286
1 4,826.286
1 0.3961 0.0000 4,836.188
0 Vendor 0.3255 15.3041 1.9855 0.0508 1.2943 0.0140 1.3083 0.3739 0.0134 0.3873 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2034
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,872.707
2 7,872.707
2 0.4301 0.0000 7,883.458
3 Total 1.4369 15.8183 8.9187 0.0844 6.5844 0.0324 6.6168 1.7800 0.0303 1.8103
0.0000 3,046.421
1 3,046.421
1 0.0340 0.0000 3,047.270
3 Worker 1.1115 0.5142 6.9333 0.0336 5.2901 0.0184 5.3085 1.4061 0.0169 1.4229
0.0000 4,826.286
1 4,826.286
1 0.3961 0.0000 4,836.188
0 Vendor 0.3255 15.3041 1.9855 0.0508 1.2943 0.0140 1.3083 0.3739 0.0134 0.3873 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,820.285
0 7,820.285
0 0.4251 0.0000 7,830.912
4 Total 1.3591 15.7409 8.5383 0.0838 6.5844 0.0311 6.6155 1.7800 0.0291 1.8091
0.0000 2,996.592
0 2,996.592
0 0.0314 0.0000 2,997.376
9 Worker 1.0349 0.4806 6.5649 0.0331 5.2901 0.0172 5.3073 1.4061 0.0158 1.4218
0.0000 4,823.692
9 4,823.692
9 0.3937 0.0000 4,833.535
5 Vendor 0.3242 15.2604 1.9733 0.0507 1.2943 0.0140 1.3082 0.3739 0.0133 0.3873 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 4,840.776
0 4,840.776
0 0.3930 0.0000 4,850.599
7 Vendor 0.3243 15.2805 1.9708 0.0509 1.2993 0.0139 1.3132 0.3754 0.0133 0.3887 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0128 0.0000 343.3530 003
Off-Road 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0128 0.0000 343.3530 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2035
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,820.285
0 7,820.285
0 0.4251 0.0000 7,830.912
4 Total 1.3591 15.7409 8.5383 0.0838 6.5844 0.0311 6.6155 1.7800 0.0291 1.8091
0.0000 2,996.592
0 2,996.592
0 0.0314 0.0000 2,997.376
9 Worker 1.0349 0.4806 6.5649 0.0331 5.2901 0.0172 5.3073 1.4061 0.0158 1.4218
0.0000 4,823.692
9 4,823.692
9 0.3937 0.0000 4,833.535
5 Vendor 0.3242 15.2604 1.9733 0.0507 1.2943 0.0140 1.3082 0.3739 0.0133 0.3873
0.0000 2,965.466
9 2,965.466
9 0.0294 0.0000 2,966.201
0 Worker 0.9734 0.4564 6.2788 0.0327 5.3105 0.0162 5.3266 1.4115 0.0149 1.4263
0.0000 4,840.776
0 4,840.776
0 0.3930 0.0000 4,850.599
7 Vendor 0.3243 15.2805 1.9708 0.0509 1.2993 0.0139 1.3132 0.3754 0.0133 0.3887 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0128 0.0000 343.3526 003
Off-Road 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0128 0.0000 343.3526 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,806.242
9 7,806.242
9 0.4223 0.0000 7,816.800
7 Total 1.2977 15.7368 8.2496 0.0836 6.6097 0.0301 6.6398 1.7868 0.0282 1.8150
0.0000 2,965.466
9 2,965.466
9 0.0294 0.0000 2,966.201
0 Worker 0.9734 0.4564 6.2788 0.0327 5.3105 0.0162 5.3266 1.4115 0.0149 1.4263
0.0000 6,280.885
1 6,280.885
1 0.3398 0.0000 6,289.379
9 Total 1.0441 12.6618 6.6376 0.0673 5.3182 0.0242 5.3424 1.4377 0.0227 1.4603
0.0000 2,386.007
9 2,386.007
9 0.0236 0.0000 2,386.598
5 Worker 0.7832 0.3672 5.0519 0.0263 4.2728 0.0130 4.2858 1.1357 0.0120 1.1476
0.0000 3,894.877
2 3,894.877
2 0.3162 0.0000 3,902.781
4 Vendor 0.2609 12.2947 1.5857 0.0410 1.0454 0.0112 1.0566 0.3020 0.0107 0.3127 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0041 276.0041 0.0103 0.0000 276.2611 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Total 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0041 276.0041 0.0103 0.0000 276.2611 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Off-Road 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2036
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,806.242
9 7,806.242
9 0.4223 0.0000 7,816.800
7 Total 1.2977 15.7368 8.2496 0.0836 6.6097 0.0301 6.6398 1.7868 0.0282 1.8150
3.6 Paving - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 6,280.885
1 6,280.885
1 0.3398 0.0000 6,289.379
9 Total 1.0441 12.6618 6.6376 0.0673 5.3182 0.0242 5.3424 1.4377 0.0227 1.4603
0.0000 2,386.007
9 2,386.007
9 0.0236 0.0000 2,386.598
5 Worker 0.7832 0.3672 5.0519 0.0263 4.2728 0.0130 4.2858 1.1357 0.0120 1.1476
0.0000 3,894.877
2 3,894.877
2 0.3162 0.0000 3,902.781
4 Vendor 0.2609 12.2947 1.5857 0.0410 1.0454 0.0112 1.0566 0.3020 0.0107 0.3127 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0037 276.0037 0.0103 0.0000 276.2607 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Total 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0037 276.0037 0.0103 0.0000 276.2607 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Off-Road 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Total 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5917 271.5917 0.0846 0.0000 273.7054 003
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5917 271.5917 0.0846 0.0000 273.7054 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.6 Paving - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Total 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5914 271.5914 0.0846 0.0000 273.7051 003
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5914 271.5914 0.0846 0.0000 273.7051 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Total 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Worker 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0670 89.0670 0.0282 0.0000 89.7715 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0670 89.0670 0.0282 0.0000 89.7715 004
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 97.4990 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Total 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Worker 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0669 89.0669 0.0282 0.0000 89.7714 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0669 89.0669 0.0282 0.0000 89.7714 004
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003
Off-Road 0.0390 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3991 004
Archit. Coating 97.4990 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Total 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Worker 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003Total 97.5380 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3992 004
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003Off-Road 0.0390 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3992 004
0.0000 11.1067 11.1067 9.4000e004
5.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301
003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Total 32.5113 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004
0.0000 11.1067 11.1067 9.4000e0045.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301 003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Off-Road 0.0116 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004 Archit. Coating 32.4997 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Total 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Worker 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003Total 97.5380 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3991 004
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
0.0000 11.1066 11.1066 9.4000e0045.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301 003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Total 32.5113 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004
0.0000 11.1066 11.1066 9.4000e0045.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301 003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Off-Road 0.0116 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004 Archit. Coating 32.4997 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e0030.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742 003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Total 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e0030.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742 003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Worker 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e003
0.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742
003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Total 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e0030.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742 003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Worker 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1.3 User Entered Comments
Only CalEEMod defaults were used.Project Characteristics - CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Strip Mall 1,294.67 1000sqft 138.72 1,294,669.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 403.37 1000sqft 37.04 403,370.00 0 Single Family Housing 4,221.00 Dwelling Unit 823.55 7,597,800.00 12072 Apartments Mid Rise 2,910.00 Dwelling Unit 103.55 2,910,000.00 8323 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 42.63 Acre 42.63 0.00 0
Junior College (2Yr) 308.49 1000sqft 23.61 308,493.00 0 Government Office Building 16.99 1000sqft 1.95 16,988.00 0 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 2,489.07 1000sqft 114.28 2,489,065.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 9:14 PM Construction - Fresno County, Summary Report
Construction
Fresno, Summary Report
15.0166 W 24.3263 S 149.9310 W 158.6809 S 0.8229 S 53.0520 W 15.0166 W
0.8483 S 53.4458 W 15.3914 W
2023 Building Construction 24.3263 S 149.9310 W 158.6809 S 0.8229 S 53.0520 W
0.8483 S 53.4458 W 15.3914 W 27.2557 S 187.3526 W 174.2828 S 199.5350 W 189.1126 S 0.8674 S 53.6668 W 15.5997 W
2022 Building Construction 27.2557 S 187.3526 W 174.2828 S
16.2685 W
2021 Building Construction 29.4365 S 199.5350 W 189.1126 S 0.8674 S 53.6668 W 15.5997 W 29.4365 S
16.2685 W 32.6465 S 220.1385 W 208.0496 S 0.8863 S 54.3686 W
0.9040 S 55.0382 W 16.9060 W
2020 Building Construction 32.6465 S 220.1385 W 208.0496 S 0.8863 S 54.3686 W
0.9040 S 55.0382 W 16.9060 W 36.5558 S 241.1706 W 232.4517 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W 17.3712 W
2019 Building Construction 36.5558 S 241.1706 W 232.4517 S
5.8389 W
2018 Building Construction 40.6521 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W 17.3712 W 40.6521 S
5.8389 W 4.8556 S 54.8583 W 34.1390 S 0.0643 S 11.2369 W
0.0644 S 11.4884 W 6.0703 W
2019 Grading 4.8556 S 54.8583 W 34.1390 S 0.0643 S 11.2369 W
0.0644 S 11.4884 W 6.0703 W 5.2194 S 59.8853 W 35.9513 S
48.5544 W 23.2569 S 0.0402 S 20.8079 W 12.3477 W
2018 Grading 5.2194 S 59.8853 W 35.9513 S
1.7089 W
2018 Site Preparation 4.6801 S 48.5544 W 23.2569 S 0.0402 S 20.8079 W 12.3477 W 4.6801 S
1.7089 W 3.6031 S 36.1041 W 22.6424 S 0.0407 S 1.9345 W
0.0407 S 2.0785 W 1.8444 W
2019 Demolition 3.6031 S 36.1041 W 22.6424 S 0.0407 S 1.9345 W
0.0407 S 2.0785 W 1.8444 W 3.8185 S 38.6665 W 22.9626 S PM10 PM2.5
Year Phase lb/day
2018 Demolition 3.8185 S 38.6665 W 22.9626 S
ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX CO SO2
Peak Daily Construction Emissions
Peak Daily Construction Emissions
Unmitigated Mitigated
Grading - Fleet Mix - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors -
2.0 Peak Daily Emissions
Land Use - Based on the Dual Land Use scenarioConstruction Phase - Based on CalEEMod default and normalized to an 25-year buildout. Assumes overlap of all phases.Trips and VMT - Assumes one water truck and 2 trips per water truck.
Construction 2018 13,467.2562 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.9357 13,467.2537 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.9331 CH4 N2O CO2e
GHG Activity Year MT/yr
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2
3.0 Annual GHG Emissions
Annual GHG
Annual GHG
Unmitigated Mitigated
Exceed Significance?
17.3712 W
Air District Threshold
17.3712 W 753.4776 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W
0.0913 S 8.5453 S 2.3966 S
Peak Daily Total 753.4776 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W
0.0913 S 8.5453 S 2.3966 S 752.8599 S 5.3026 W 38.4560 S
5.9775 W 43.2659 S 0.0940 S 8.5688 S 2.4200 S
2019 Architectural Coating 752.8599 S 5.3026 W 38.4560 S
0.7920 S
2018 Architectural Coating 753.4776 S 5.9775 W 43.2659 S 0.0940 S 8.5688 S 2.4200 S 753.4776 S
0.7920 S 1.5351 S 15.2951 W 15.2044 S 0.0241 S 0.9486 S
0.0241 S 1.0802 S 0.9131 S
2019 Paving 1.5351 S 15.2951 W 15.2044 S 0.0241 S 0.9486 S
0.0241 S 1.0802 S 0.9131 S 1.7330 S 17.5794 W 15.4066 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W 14.3287 W
2018 Paving 1.7330 S 17.5794 W 15.4066 S
14.3287 W
2036 Building Construction 11.9607 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W 14.3287 W 11.9607 S
14.3287 W 11.9607 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W
0.7053 S 52.3807 W 14.3947 W
2035 Building Construction 11.9607 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W
0.7053 S 52.3807 W 14.3947 W 12.6464 S 128.8452 W 90.4074 S 129.4742 W 93.7263 S 0.7101 S 52.3906 W 14.4038 W
2034 Building Construction 12.6464 S 128.8452 W 90.4074 S
14.4137 W
2033 Building Construction 13.3431 S 129.4742 W 93.7263 S 0.7101 S 52.3906 W 14.4038 W 13.3431 S
14.4137 W 14.1977 S 130.2314 W 97.4276 S 0.7159 S 52.4013 W
0.7227 S 52.4131 W 14.4247 W
2032 Building Construction 14.1977 S 130.2314 W 97.4276 S 0.7159 S 52.4013 W
0.7227 S 52.4131 W 14.4247 W 15.1857 S 131.1262 W 101.7310 S 132.1630 W 106.6551 S 0.7308 S 52.4259 W 14.4365 W
2031 Building Construction 15.1857 S 131.1262 W 101.7310 S
14.7974 W
2030 Building Construction 16.2870 S 132.1630 W 106.6551 S 0.7308 S 52.4259 W 14.4365 W 16.2870 S
14.7974 W 17.3944 S 137.8571 W 111.8001 S 0.7361 S 52.8190 W
0.7469 S 52.8338 W 14.8111 W
2029 Building Construction 17.3944 S 137.8571 W 111.8001 S 0.7361 S 52.8190 W
0.7469 S 52.8338 W 14.8111 W 18.4624 S 139.1653 W 117.6445 S 140.5215 W 123.8764 S 0.7591 S 52.8493 W 14.8255 W
2028 Building Construction 18.4624 S 139.1653 W 117.6445 S
14.8371 W
2027 Building Construction 19.4834 S 140.5215 W 123.8764 S 0.7591 S 52.8493 W 14.8255 W 19.4834 S
14.8371 W 20.4873 S 142.2466 W 131.0835 S 0.7731 S 52.8616 W
0.7869 S 52.8669 W 14.8422 W
2026 Building Construction 20.4873 S 142.2466 W 131.0835 S 0.7731 S 52.8616 W
0.7869 S 52.8669 W 14.8422 W 21.5220 S 144.0282 W 138.3137 S 146.9369 W 147.9268 S 0.8046 S 52.9585 W 14.9283 W
2025 Building Construction 21.5220 S 144.0282 W 138.3137 S2024 Building Construction 22.8278 S 146.9369 W 147.9268 S 0.8046 S 52.9585 W 14.9283 W 22.8278 S Exceed Significance?
Significance ThresholdTotal
6,556.8888 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.64078,149.2761 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.1533 Construction 2036 6,556.8892 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.6410
8,162.0039 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.9740
Construction 2035 8,149.2765 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.1537
8,214.4261 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.5200
Construction 2034 8,162.0043 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.9744
8,340.5459 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.8827
Construction 2033 8,214.4265 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.5204
8,382.6359 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.0760
Construction 2032 8,340.5463 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.8831
8,470.7344 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.3552
Construction 2031 8,382.6363 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.0764
8,532.5561 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.8284
Construction 2030 8,470.7348 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.3556
8,617.2784 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.7156
Construction 2029 8,532.5565 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.8288
8,783.7005 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.3921
Construction 2028 8,617.2788 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.7160
8,937.1834 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.0529
Construction 2027 8,783.7008 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.3925
9,088.4031 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.4426
Construction 2026 8,937.1837 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.0532
9,317.1223 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.3769
Construction 2025 9,088.4034 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.4430
9,444.6039 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.8959
Construction 2024 9,317.1227 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.3773
9,730.5793 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.0799
Construction 2023 9,444.6043 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.8963
9,977.3110 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.6695
Construction 2022 9,730.5796 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.0802
10,223.5775 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.9150
Construction 2021 9,977.3113 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.6699
11,568.1182 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.2018
Construction 2020 10,223.5779 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.9153Construction 2019 11,568.1195 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.2032 Paving Equipment Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
0.00 Pavers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00Graders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change
0.00 Generator Sets Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change
0.00 Excavators Diesel No Change 0 5 No Change 0.00Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change
0.00 Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change
0.00 0.00
OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation
Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioPhase ROG NOx CO SO2 CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Exhaust PM10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1
Date: 7/31/2017 9:09 PM
Construction
Fresno County, Mitigation Report
Construction Mitigation Summary
2.42870E-001 0.00000E+000 1.17098E+003 1.17098E+003 2.40800E-001 0.00000E+000 1.17700E+003
8.52185E+001 6.49000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.53808E+001
Cranes 7.21140E-001 6.37238E+000 3.68809E+000 1.34100E-002 2.62240E-001
4.45292E+001
Concrete/Industrial
Saws
8.07100E-002 6.11380E-001 5.89660E-001 9.90000E-004 4.12600E-002 4.12600E-002 0.00000E+000 8.52185E+001 Air Compressors 5.05600E-002 3.41590E-001 3.22070E-001 5.20000E-004 2.52500E-002 2.52500E-002 0.00000E+000 4.44266E+001 4.44266E+001 4.10000E-003 0.00000E+000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated tons/yr Mitigated mt/yr
4.62877E+002
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
1.09830E-001 0.00000E+000 4.61705E+002 4.61705E+002 4.68800E-002 0.00000E+000
2.13617E+003 4.72250E-001 0.00000E+000 2.14798E+003
Welders 5.77260E-001 3.31462E+000 4.08581E+000 6.27000E-003 1.09830E-001
6.79260E+002
Tractors/Loaders/B
ackhoes
1.31034E+000 1.15316E+001 1.67478E+001 2.43500E-002 5.69040E-001 5.26740E-001 0.00000E+000 2.13617E+003
2.41370E-001 0.00000E+000 6.73975E+002 6.73975E+002 2.11410E-001 0.00000E+000
6.59048E+002 2.05840E-001 0.00000E+000 6.64193E+002
Scrapers 5.44360E-001 6.67418E+000 4.14747E+000 7.44000E-003 2.62350E-001
8.36305E+001
Rubber Tired
Dozers
9.82880E-001 1.05615E+001 3.69327E+000 7.23000E-003 5.13720E-001 4.72630E-001 0.00000E+000 6.59048E+002
5.29900E-002 0.00000E+000 8.29821E+001 8.29821E+001 2.59400E-002 0.00000E+000
1.28911E+002 4.02900E-002 0.00000E+000 1.29918E+002
Rollers 8.70200E-002 8.45740E-001 6.71090E-001 9.10000E-004 5.76000E-002
1.49928E+002
Paving Equipment 8.05800E-002 8.90200E-001 8.81470E-001 1.42000E-003 4.37100E-002 4.02200E-002 0.00000E+000 1.28911E+002
5.45800E-002 0.00000E+000 1.48766E+002 1.48766E+002 4.65000E-002 0.00000E+000
1.47920E+002 4.64000E-002 0.00000E+000 1.49080E+002
Pavers 1.10160E-001 1.21365E+000 1.01629E+000 1.64000E-003 5.93300E-002
1.38783E+003
Graders 1.23790E-001 1.68679E+000 4.61240E-001 1.63000E-003 5.45200E-002 5.01600E-002 0.00000E+000 1.47920E+002
2.52160E-001 0.00000E+000 1.38645E+003 1.38645E+003 5.49200E-002 0.00000E+000
1.06484E+003 2.22740E-001 0.00000E+000 1.07041E+003
Generator Sets 6.84020E-001 6.07983E+000 8.98686E+000 1.61400E-002 2.52160E-001
4.56705E+002
Forklifts 7.65630E-001 6.16757E+000 8.59735E+000 1.21900E-002 3.35850E-001 3.10300E-001 0.00000E+000 1.06484E+003
1.27490E-001 0.00000E+000 4.53159E+002 4.53159E+002 1.41810E-001 0.00000E+000
1.17099E+003 2.40800E-001 0.00000E+000 1.17701E+003
Excavators 2.70540E-001 2.86217E+000 3.16201E+000 4.99000E-003 1.38580E-001
8.53809E+001
Cranes 7.21140E-001 6.37238E+000 3.68809E+000 1.34100E-002 2.62240E-001 2.42870E-001 0.00000E+000 1.17099E+003 Concrete/Industrial 4.12600E-002 0.00000E+000 8.52186E+001 8.52186E+001 6.49000E-003 0.00000E+000 Saws
8.07100E-002 6.11380E-001 5.89660E-001 9.90000E-004 4.12600E-002
0.00000E+000 4.44267E+001 4.44267E+001 4.10000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.45293E+001 CO2e
Unmitigated tons/yr Unmitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 5.05600E-002 3.41590E-001 3.22070E-001 5.20000E-004 2.52500E-002 2.52500E-002 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
0.00 Welders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel No Change 0 9 No Change
0.00 Scrapers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel No Change 0 6 No ChangeRollers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19124E-006 1.19124E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.18822E-006
1.19372E-006 1.19372E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19182E-006 Welders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 2.44750E-006 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 1.19247E-006
Tractors/Loaders/Bac
khoes
0.00000E+000 8.67184E-007 1.19419E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.18699E-006 1.18699E-006 0.00000E+000
1.18353E-006 1.18353E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.18941E-006 Scrapers 0.00000E+000 1.49831E-006 2.41111E-006 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 1.19574E-006
Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00000E+000 9.46833E-007 2.70763E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.20508E-006 1.20508E-006 0.00000E+000
1.24117E-006 1.24117E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23154E-006 Rollers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 1.20058E-006
Paving Equipment 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.20996E-006 1.20996E-006 0.00000E+000
1.14927E-006 1.14927E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.14033E-006 Pavers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 1.18891E-006
Graders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19009E-006 1.19009E-006 0.00000E+000
1.19267E-006 1.19267E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.18646E-006 Generator Sets 0.00000E+000 1.64478E-006 1.11274E-006 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 1.18238E-006
Forklifts 0.00000E+000 1.62138E-006 1.16315E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19163E-006 1.19163E-006 0.00000E+000
1.18703E-006 1.18703E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.18946E-006 Excavators 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 1.17122E-006
Cranes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17345E-006 1.17345E-006 0.00000E+000
1.12545E-006 1.12545E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.12286E-006 Concrete/Industrial
Saws
0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000
CO2e
Percent Reduction
Air Compressors 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
4.61705E+002 4.68800E-002 0.00000E+000 4.62877E+002
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10
2.14798E+003
Welders 5.77260E-001 3.31462E+000 4.08580E+000 6.27000E-003 1.09830E-001 1.09830E-001 0.00000E+000 4.61705E+002
5.26740E-001 0.00000E+000 2.13617E+003 2.13617E+003 4.72250E-001 0.00000E+000
6.73974E+002 2.11410E-001 0.00000E+000 6.79259E+002
Tractors/Loaders/Bac
khoes
1.31034E+000 1.15316E+001 1.67478E+001 2.43500E-002 5.69040E-001
6.64193E+002
Scrapers 5.44360E-001 6.67417E+000 4.14746E+000 7.44000E-003 2.62350E-001 2.41370E-001 0.00000E+000 6.73974E+002
4.72630E-001 0.00000E+000 6.59047E+002 6.59047E+002 2.05840E-001 0.00000E+000
8.29820E+001 2.59400E-002 0.00000E+000 8.36304E+001
Rubber Tired Dozers 9.82880E-001 1.05615E+001 3.69326E+000 7.23000E-003 5.13720E-001
1.29918E+002
Rollers 8.70200E-002 8.45740E-001 6.71090E-001 9.10000E-004 5.76000E-002 5.29900E-002 0.00000E+000 8.29820E+001
4.02200E-002 0.00000E+000 1.28911E+002 1.28911E+002 4.02900E-002 0.00000E+000
1.48765E+002 4.65000E-002 0.00000E+000 1.49928E+002
Paving Equipment 8.05800E-002 8.90200E-001 8.81470E-001 1.42000E-003 4.37100E-002
1.49080E+002
Pavers 1.10160E-001 1.21365E+000 1.01629E+000 1.64000E-003 5.93300E-002 5.45800E-002 0.00000E+000 1.48765E+002
5.01600E-002 0.00000E+000 1.47920E+002 1.47920E+002 4.64000E-002 0.00000E+000
1.38645E+003 5.49200E-002 0.00000E+000 1.38783E+003
Graders 1.23790E-001 1.68679E+000 4.61240E-001 1.63000E-003 5.45200E-002
1.07041E+003
Generator Sets 6.84020E-001 6.07982E+000 8.98685E+000 1.61400E-002 2.52160E-001 2.52160E-001 0.00000E+000 1.38645E+003
3.10300E-001 0.00000E+000 1.06484E+003 1.06484E+003 2.22740E-001 0.00000E+000
4.53159E+002 1.41810E-001 0.00000E+000 4.56704E+002
Forklifts 7.65630E-001 6.16756E+000 8.59734E+000 1.21900E-002 3.35850E-001 Excavators 2.70540E-001 2.86217E+000 3.16201E+000 4.99000E-003 1.38580E-001 1.27490E-001 0.00000E+000 4.53159E+002 Site Preparation Roads 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Site Preparation Fugitive Dust 1.72 0.94 1.72 0.94 0.00 0.00Paving Roads 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
0.00 0.00
Paving Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Grading Roads 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
0.00 0.00
Grading Fugitive Dust 4.26 1.77 4.26 1.77 0.00 0.00Demolition Roads 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
0.00 0.00
Demolition Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Building Construction Roads 124.24 33.59 124.24 33.59
0.00 0.00
Building Construction Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Architectural Coating Roads 1.42 0.38 1.42 0.38 PM10 PM2.5
Architectural Coating Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase Source PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5
Unmitigated Mitigated Percent Reduction
No Clean Paved Road % PM Reduction 0.00
Frequency (per day)
No Unpaved Road Mitigation Moisture
Content %
Vehicle Speed (mph)
No Water Exposed Area PM10 Reduction PM2.5
Reduction
No Replace Ground Cover of Area
Disturbed
PM10 Reduction PM2.5
Reduction
No Soil Stabilizer for unpaved
Roads
PM10 Reduction PM2.5
Reduction
Fugitive Dust Mitigation
Yes/No Mitigation Measure Mitigation Input Mitigation Input Mitigation Input
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Strip Mall 1,294.67 1000sqft 138.72 1,294,669.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 403.37 1000sqft 37.04 403,370.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 2,910.00 Dwelling Unit 103.55 2,910,000.00 8323 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 42.63 Acre 42.63 0.00 0
Junior College (2Yr) 308.49 1000sqft 23.61 308,493.00 0 Government Office Building 17.00 1000sqft 1.95 16,998.00 0 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 2,489.07 1000sqft 114.28 2,489,065.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 9:53 PM Operation Non-Residential - Fresno County, Annual
Operation Non-Residential
Fresno County, Annual
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.39 1.95
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,294,670.00 1,294,669.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 57.14 114.28tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 308,490.00 308,493.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,856,962.80 0.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,489,070.00 2,489,065.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 17,000.00 16,998.00tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1,856,962.80 0.00tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1,294,670.00 1,294,669.00tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 17,000.00 16,998.00tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 308,490.00 308,493.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 500.00 1.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 2,489,070.00 2,489,065.00 Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Water And Wastewater - Based on data provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.Solid Waste - Based on data provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Vehicle Emission Factors - Land Use - Based on Dual Land Use. Assumes apartments of 4 stories or higher.Construction Phase - Operation run only.Vehicle Trips - Based on VMT and ADT information provided by Fehr & Peers.Woodstoves - tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 64.70 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 64.40 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 62.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 88.60 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 423.54 2,650.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1,359.40 11,416.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 15.81 93.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 401.04 1,126.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1,338.60 2,963.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 2,314.84 10,902.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 29.72 138.72
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2040
tblLandUse LotAcreage 76.58 103.55tblLandUse LotAcreage 9.26 37.04tblLandUse LotAcreage 7.08 23.61 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 10.80 8.04tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 48.40 100.00tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 15.90 0.00tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 7.50 0.00tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 35.70 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 35.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 40.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 34.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 7.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 19.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 16.30 100.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 16.60 100.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 6.40 100.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.04tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.04tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.04tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.04tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.04tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 5.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 68.93 1,537.63
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 27.49 84.68tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 8.98tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 10.49tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 64.76tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 20.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 1,537.63tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.21 84.68tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 8.98tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 10.49tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 64.76tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 20.18tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 1,537.63tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 11.23 84.68tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 8.98tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 10.49tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 54.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 45.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 50.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 77.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 11.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 15.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 16.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 1.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 4.00 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 23,666,648.67 12,063,053.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 271,143,324.59 33,370,379.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 2,069,905.76 996,450.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 95,899,471.39 96,707,226.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 119,529,309.18 40,722,508.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,956,347.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 29,878,632.99 12,167,779.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,377,214.66 213,525.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 15,131,136.04 12,063,053.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 189,598,214.56 141,029,602.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 442,391,740.12 33,370,379.00tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt
2.21 0.00
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 64.76tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 20.18 6,022.445
3 250,499.8
836
256,522.32
89 367.4143 0.5097 265,859.5
891
Total 62.0016 460.1253 278.9817 2.4617 175.6285 1.3995 177.0280 47.2933 1.3522 48.6455 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 105.2588 569.5314 674.7902 0.3880 0.2342 754.2922 5,917.186
6 0.0000 5,917.1866 349.6957 0.0000 14,659.57
93 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 226,996.7
055
226,996.70
55 16.4392 0.0000 227,407.6
853
Mobile 25.8070 453.8115 253.6694 2.4229 175.6285 0.8030 176.4315 47.2933 0.7557 48.0490
0.0000 21,637.63
69 21,637.636
9 0.8334 0.2524 21,733.68
62 Energy 0.5624 4.9766 3.2954 0.0307 0.3886 0.3886 0.3886 0.3886
0.0000 1,296.009
7 1,296.0097 0.0580 0.0231 1,304.346
1 Area 35.6322 1.3372 22.0170 8.0900e- 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 003
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
2.2 Overall Operational
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 103.55 0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 103.55 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 18,312,710.54 10,815,804.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 58,777,095.37 0.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,441,220.00
0.00 1.18 0.01 0.00 1.22 0.03 0.35 0.22 0.22 0.02 10.39 0.22 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
6,001.393
6 249,958.5
553
255,959.94
89 367.3236 0.4568 265,279.1
542
Total 61.9777 459.9128 278.8371 2.4604 175.6285 1.3830 177.0115 47.2933 1.3357 48.6290 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 84.2070 469.6944 553.9014 0.3111 0.1875 617.5582 5,917.186
6 0.0000 5,917.1866 349.6957 0.0000 14,659.57
93 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 226,996.7
055
226,996.70
55 16.4392 0.0000 227,407.6
853
Mobile 25.8070 453.8115 253.6694 2.4229 175.6285 0.8030 176.4315 47.2933 0.7557 48.0490
0.0000 21,196.14
57 21,196.145
7 0.8196 0.2461 21,289.98
54 Energy 0.5385 4.7641 3.1508 0.0294 0.3720 0.3720 0.3720 0.3720
0.0000 1,296.009
7 1,296.0097 0.0580 0.0231 1,304.346
1 Area 35.6322 1.3372 22.0170 8.0900e- 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 156,753.47 156,753.47 156,753.47 458,748,433 458,748,433 Strip Mall 26,126.44 26,126.44 26126.44 76,460,596 76,460,596 Regional Shopping Center 26,122.24 26,122.24 26122.24 76,448,306 76,448,306 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Junior College (2Yr) 26,122.93 26,122.93 26122.93 76,450,331 76,450,331 Government Office Building 26,139.71 26,139.71 26139.71 76,499,430 76,499,430 General Office Building 26,110.34 26,110.34 26110.34 76,413,489 76,413,489 Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 26,131.80 26,131.80 26131.80 76,476,281 76,476,281
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 226,996.7
055
226,996.70
55 16.4392 0.0000 227,407.6
853
Unmitigated 25.8070 453.8115 253.6694 2.4229 175.6285 0.8030 176.4315 47.2933 0.7557 48.0490
0.0000 226,996.7
055
226,996.70
55 16.4392 0.0000 227,407.6
853
Mitigated 25.8070 453.8115 253.6694 2.4229 175.6285 0.8030 176.4315 47.2933 0.7557 48.0490 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434 0.000910 0.000395
0.000910 0.000395
Strip Mall 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 Regional Shopping Center 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434
0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434 0.000910 0.000395
0.000910 0.000395
Apartments Mid Rise 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434
0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434 0.000910 0.000395
0.000910 0.000395
Junior College (2Yr) 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 Government Office Building 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434
0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434 0.000910 0.000395
SBUS MH
General Office Building 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Strip Mall 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Regional Shopping Center 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Junior College (2Yr) 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Government Office Building 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
General Office Building 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW
5,565.955
4 0.1067 0.1020 5,599.031
1 0.3886 0.3886 0.3886 0.0000 5,565.9554
746.4195
Total 0.5624 4.9766 3.2954 0.0307 0.3886
4.0900e- 0.0518 0.0000 742.0102 742.0102 0.0142 0.0136
003
0.0518 0.0518 0.0518
231.1824 4.4300e003 4.2400e- 003 232.5562
Strip Mall 1.39047e+
007
0.0750 0.6816 0.5726
0.0161 0.0161 0.0161 0.0000 231.1824
0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center
4.33219e+
006
0.0234 0.2124 0.1784 1.2700e003 0.0161
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 365.4644 7.0000e003 6.7000e- 003 367.6362
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0255 0.0255 0.0255 0.0000 365.4644
11.9716
Junior College
(2Yr)
6.84854e+
006
0.0369 0.3357 0.2820 2.0100e003 0.0255
8.3000e004 0.0000 11.9009 11.9009 2.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 1,742.677
0 0.0334 0.0320 1,753.032
8 Government
Office Building
223014 1.2000e003 0.0109 9.1800e- 003
0.1217 0.1217 0.1217 0.0000 1,742.6770
2,487.414
8 General Office
Building
3.26565e+
007
0.1761 1.6008 1.3447 9.6000e003 0.1217
0.1726 0.0000 2,472.7207 2,472.720
7 Apartments Mid 0.0136 0.1726 0.1726 0.1726 0.0474 0.0453 Rise
4.6337e+0
07 0.2499 2.1351 0.9086
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
5,565.955
4 5,565.9554 0.1067 0.1020 5,599.031
1 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
0.3886 0.3886 0.3886 0.3886 0.0000
0.1021 0.0977 5,360.631
1 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.5624 4.9766 3.2954 0.0307
0.3720 0.3720 0.0000 5,328.963
7 5,328.9637
16,134.65
51 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.5385 4.7641 3.1508 0.0294 0.3720 0.3720
0.0000 0.0000 16,071.68
15 16,071.681
5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7267 0.1504
15,867.18
19 15,867.181
9 0.7175 0.1484 15,929.35
43 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2
Other Non-Asphalt 0.0000
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
46.2672
Junior College
(2Yr)
3.61245e+
006
1,050.9040 0.0475 9.8300e003 1,055.021 8
Government
Office Building
158421 46.0866 2.0800e003 4.3000e- 004
4,117.447
3 General Office
Building
2.31981e+
007
6,748.5892 0.3052 0.0631 6,775.032
1 Land Use kWh/yr t
o
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.40984e+
007
4,101.3769 0.1855 0.0384
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5,328.9637 5,328.963
7 0.1022 0.0977 5,360.631
1 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
0.3720 0.3720 0.3720 0.3720 0.0000
0.0131 716.3265
Total 0.5385 4.7641 3.1508 0.0294
0.5495 3.9200e- 0.0497 0.0497 0.0000 712.0948 712.0948 0.0137 003
0.0497 0.0497
221.8619 221.8619 4.2500e003 4.0700e- 003 223.1803
Strip Mall 1.33442e+
007
0.0720 0.6541
0.0155 0.0155 0.0155 0.0155 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center
4.15753e+
006
0.0224 0.2038 0.1712 1.2200e003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 348.2942 348.2942 6.6800e003 6.3900e- 003 350.3639
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000
0.0243 0.0243 0.0243 0.0243 0.0000
2.1000e004 11.3858
Junior College
(2Yr)
6.52679e+
006
0.0352 0.3199 0.2688 1.9200e003
7.9000e004 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 11.3185 11.3185 2.2000e- 004 8.7300e- 003 6.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 7.9000e- 004 1,657.4027 1,657.402
7 0.0318 0.0304 1,667.251
8 Government
Office Building
212101 1.1400e003 0.0104
0.1157 0.1157 0.1157 0.1157 0.0000
0.0436 2,392.122
9 General Office
Building
3.10586e+
007
0.1675 1.5225 1.2789 9.1300e003
0.1660 0.1660 0.0000 2,377.9917 2,377.991
7 0.8738 0.0131 0.1660 0.1660 0.0456
CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
4.45619e+
007
0.2403 2.0533
PM2.5
Total
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO
Mitigated
3,114.868
7 Total 15,867.181
9 0.7175 0.1484 15,929.35
43 Strip Mall 1.06655e+
007
3,102.7114 0.1403 0.0290
0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center
3.32296e+
006
966.6878 0.0437 9.0400e003 970.4755
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
45.5846
Junior College
(2Yr)
3.56448e+
006
1,036.9488 0.0469 9.7000e003 1,041.011 9
Government
Office Building
156084 45.4067 2.0500e003 4.2000e- 004
4,082.335
0 General Office
Building
2.28558e+
007
6,649.0258 0.3007 0.0622 6,675.078
6 Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.39781e+
007
4,066.4016 0.1839 0.0380
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3,157.217
0 Total 16,071.681
5 0.7267 0.1504 16,134.65
51 Strip Mall 1.08105e+
007
3,144.8944 0.1422 0.0294
Regional
Shopping Center
3.36814e+
006
979.8304 0.0443 9.1700e003 983.6697
0.0000 1,296.009
7 1,296.0097 0.0580 0.0231 1,304.346
1 Total 35.6322 1.3372 22.0170 8.0900e- 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 003
Landscaping 0.6472 0.2487 21.5538 1.1400e- 0.1200 0.1200 0.1200 0.1200 0.0000 35.3762 35.3762 0.0338 0.0000 36.2213 003
0.0000 1,260.633
5 1,260.6335 0.0242 0.0231 1,268.124
8 Hearth 0.1274 1.0885 0.4632 6.9500e- 0.0880 0.0880 0.0880 0.0880 003
Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
28.9889
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
5.8687
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 1,296.009
7 1,296.0097 0.0580 0.0231 1,304.346
1 Unmitigated 35.6322 1.3372 22.0170 8.0900e- 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 003
0.0000 1,296.009
7 1,296.0097 0.0580 0.0231 1,304.346
1 Mitigated 35.6322 1.3372 22.0170 8.0900e- 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Unmitigated 674.7902 0.3880 0.2342 754.2922
Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 553.9014 0.3111 0.1875 617.5582
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow Shower
0.0000 1,296.009
7 1,296.0097 0.0580 0.0231 1,304.346
1 Total 35.6322 1.3372 22.0170 8.0900e- 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 0.2080 003
Landscaping 0.6472 0.2487 21.5538 1.1400e- 0.1200 0.1200 0.1200 0.1200 0.0000 35.3762 35.3762 0.0338 0.0000 36.2213 003
0.0000 1,260.633
5 1,260.6335 0.0242 0.0231 1,268.124
8 Hearth 0.1274 1.0885 0.4632 6.9500e- 0.0880 0.0880 0.0880 0.0880 003
Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
28.9889
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
5.8687
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
212.1580
Total 674.7902 0.3880 0.2342 754.2922
Strip Mall 96.7072 /
0 186.4441 0.1247 0.0758
5.7651
Regional
Shopping Center
12.1678 /
10.8158
34.4711 0.0162 9.6400e003 37.7496
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
1.95635 /
1.44122
5.2391 2.5900e003 1.5500e- 003
1.4870
Junior College
(2Yr)
12.0631 /
12.0631
35.5391 0.0161 9.5700e003 38.7947
Government
Office Building
0.213525 /
0.99645
1.4262 3.2000e004 1.8000e- 004
351.0189
General Office
Building
33.3704 /
33.3704
98.3129 0.0446 0.0265 107.3190
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
141.03 /
40.7225
313.3575 0.1837 0.1110
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 5,917.1866 349.6957 0.0000 14,659.579
3 to
MT/yr
Mitigated 5,917.1866 349.6957 0.0000 14,659.579
3 8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
169.7264
Total 553.9014 0.3111 0.1875 617.5582
Strip Mall 77.3658 /
0 149.1553 0.0997 0.0607
4.8168
Regional
Shopping Center
9.73422 /
10.156
29.1076 0.0130 7.7300e003 31.7364
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
1.56508 /
1.35331
4.3953 2.0800e003 1.2400e- 003
1.3312
Junior College
(2Yr)
9.65044 /
11.3272
30.1386 0.0130 7.6800e003 32.7498
Government
Office Building
0.17082 /
0.935667
1.2820 2.6000e004 1.4000e- 004
286.6011
General Office
Building
26.6963 /
31.3348
83.3732 0.0359 0.0212 90.5966
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
112.824 /
38.2384
256.4494 0.1472 0.0888
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5,741.123
7 Total 5,917.1866 349.6957 0.0000 14,659.57
93 Strip Mall 11416 2,317.3448 136.9512 0.0000
0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center
2650 537.9261 31.7905 0.0000 1,332.689
0 Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
46.7698
Junior College
(2Yr)
1126 228.5678 13.5080 0.0000 566.2671
Government
Office Building
93 18.8782 1.1157 0.0000
1,490.097
2 General Office
Building
10902 2,213.0075 130.7850 0.0000 5,482.632
4 Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
2963 601.4622 35.5454 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Load Factor Fuel Type
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power
5,741.123
7 Total 5,917.1866 349.6957 0.0000 14,659.57
93 Strip Mall 11416 2,317.3448 136.9512 0.0000
0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center
2650 537.9261 31.7905 0.0000 1,332.689
0 Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
46.7698
Junior College
(2Yr)
1126 228.5678 13.5080 0.0000 566.2671
Government
Office Building
93 18.8782 1.1157 0.0000
1,490.097
2 General Office
Building
10902 2,213.0075 130.7850 0.0000 5,482.632
4 Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
2963 601.4622 35.5454 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor
1.3 User Entered Comments
Only CalEEMod defaults were used.Project Characteristics - Land Use - Based on Dual Land Use. Assumes apartments of 4 stories or higher.
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Strip Mall 1,294.67 1000sqft 138.72 1,294,669.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 403.37 1000sqft 37.04 403,370.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 2,910.00 Dwelling Unit 103.55 2,910,000.00 8323 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 42.63 Acre 42.63 0.00 0
Junior College (2Yr) 308.49 1000sqft 23.61 308,493.00 0 Government Office Building 17.00 1000sqft 1.95 16,998.00 0 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 2,489.07 1000sqft 114.28 2,489,065.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 9:55 PM Operation Non-Residential - Fresno County, Summary Report Operation Non-Residential
Fresno, Summary Report
Exceed Significance?
Air District Threshold
367.8715 S 2,540.1404 W 1,788.7686 S 14.2504 S 1,000.6219 W 275.8470 W 995.1038 W 270.3289 W
Peak Daily Total 368.0027 S 2,541.3047 W 1,789.5608 S 14.2576 S 1,000.7126 W 275.9377 W Off-Site Mobile 163.6222 S 2,484.7232 W 1,520.7202 S 13.9073 S 995.1038 W 270.3289 W 163.6222 S 2,484.7232 W 1,520.7202 S 13.9073 S
2.9505 S 26.1046 S 17.2646 S 0.1609 S 2.0385 S 2.0385 S
3.4796 S 3.4796 S
On-Site Energy 3.0817 S 27.2688 S 18.0568 S 0.1681 S 2.1292 S 2.1292 S
3.4796 S 3.4796 S 201.2988 S 29.3126 S 250.7838 S 0.1822 S PM2.5
Operational Activity lb/day
On-Site Area 201.2988 S 29.3126 S 250.7838 S 0.1822 S
ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10
Peak Daily Operational Emissions
Peak Daily Operational Emissions
Unmitigated Mitigated
Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors -
2.0 Peak Daily Emissions
Woodstoves - Water And Wastewater - Based on data provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.Solid Waste - Based on data provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Construction Phase - Operation run only.Vehicle Trips - Based on VMT and ADT information provided by Fehr & Peers.
Exceed Significance?
Significance Threshold
255,959.9489 367.3235 0.4568 265,279.1540
Total
Operational 2040 256,522.3289 367.4143 0.5097 265,859.5908 CH4 N2O CO2e
GHG Activity Year MT/yr
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2
3.0 Annual GHG Emissions
Annual GHG
Annual GHG
Unmitigated Mitigated
No Land Use Increase Transit Accessibility 0.25
No Land Use Improve Destination Accessibility 0.00No Land Use Improve Walkability Design 0.00No Land Use Increase Diversity 0.23 0.54 Input Value 3
No Land Use Increase Density 0.00
Mitigation
Selected
Category Measure % Reduction Input Value 1 Input Value 2
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Operational Mobile Mitigation
Project Setting:
18.13 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 20.00 17.53 17.92 19.84 19.94
4.26 4.24 4.23 4.26
Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 Natural Gas 4.26 4.27 4.39 4.27 4.26 4.26 0.00 4.26
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.27 1.27 1.28 1.27
Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 Electricity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.27Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total
CO2 CH4
Operational Percent Reduction Summary
Category ROG NOx CO SO2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1
Date: 7/31/2017 9:55 PM
Operation Non-Residential
Fresno County, Mitigation Report
Total VMT Reduction 0.00
No School Trip Implement School Bus Program 0.00
Commute Commute Subtotal 0.00
No Commute Provide Ride Sharing ProgramNo Commute Employee Vanpool/Shuttle 0.00 2.00No Commute Market Commute Trip Reduction Option 0.00No Commute Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules
0.00 No Commute Workplace Parking ChargeNo Commute Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out"No Commute Transit SubsidyNo Commute Implement Trip Reduction Program Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal 0.00
Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Subtotal 0.00 No Transit Improvements Increase Transit Frequency 0.00No Transit Improvements Expand Transit Network 0.00No Transit Improvements Provide BRT System 0.00 Parking Policy Pricing Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal 0.00 No Parking Policy Pricing On-street Market Pricing 0.00No Parking Policy Pricing Unbundle Parking Costs 0.00No Parking Policy Pricing Limit Parking Supply 0.00 Neighborhood Enhancements Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal 0.00 No Neighborhood Enhancements Implement NEV Network 0.00No Neighborhood Enhancements Provide Traffic Calming MeasuresNo Neighborhood Enhancements Improve Pedestrian Network Land Use Land Use SubTotal 0.00
No Land Use Integrate Below Market Rate Housing 0.00
Refrigerator 15.00
DishWasher 15.00Fan 50.00Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % ImprovementClothWasher 30.00 No Install High Efficiency LightingNo On-site Renewable Energy Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented Mitigation Measure Input Value 1 Input Value 2 Yes Exceed Title 24 5.00
No % Electric LeafblowerNo % Electric ChainsawNo Use Low VOC Paint (Parking) 150.00No % Electric LawnmowerNo Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior) 150.00No Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior) 150.00No Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior) 150.00No Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior) 150.00No No HearthNo Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Area Mitigation
Measure Implemented Mitigation Measure Input Value
No Only Natural Gas Hearth
Solid Waste Mitigation
Mitigation Measures Input ValueInstitute Recycling and Composting ServicesPercent Reduction in Waste Disposed Yes Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems 6.10
No Water Efficient Landscape 0.00 0.00
Yes Install low-flow Shower 20.00
No Turf Reduction 0.00
Yes Install low-flow Kitchen faucet 18.00Yes Install low-flow Toilet 20.00 No Use Grey Water 0.00
Yes Install low-flow bathroom faucet 32.00
Input Value 2
No Apply Water Conservation on Strategy 0.00 0.00No Use Reclaimed Water 0.00 0.00 Water Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented Mitigation Measure Input Value 1
Solid Waste - Based on information provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.
Energy Mitigation -
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Based on Dual Land Use secnario.Vehicle Trips - Based on ADT and VMT data povided by Fehr & Peers.Woodstoves - Assumes no woodstoves.Water And Wastewater - Based on water demand and wastewater data provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Floor Surface Area Population
Single Family Housing 4,221.00 Dwelling Unit 823.55 7,597,800.00 12072
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 10:18 PM Operation-Residential - Fresno County, Annual
Operation-Residential
Fresno County, Annual
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 823.55 0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 823.55 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 275,015,142.15 398,151,123.28tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 173,379,111.35 555,425,011.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt
2.21 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 6.19tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.52 6.19tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 6.19tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 48.40 100.00tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 15.90 0.00tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 10.80 8.04tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 35.70 0.00tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 7.30 0.00tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 7.50 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2040
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4,345.92 7,744.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1,370.45 823.55
Water Mitigation - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors -
0.0000 16,617.53
20 16,617.532
0 0.6096 0.2043 16,693.65
95 Energy 0.5499 4.6988 1.9995 0.0300 0.3799 0.3799 0.3799 0.3799
0.0000 1,879.764
1 1,879.7641 0.0838 0.0335 1,891.848
6 Area 37.9225 1.9391 31.8756 0.0117 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1,712.828
5 59,703.71
53 61,416.543
9 96.9244 0.5918 64,016.00
49 Total 42.9547 83.8258 76.8150 0.4555 29.2741 0.9402 30.2143 7.8830 0.9323 8.8152 140.8665 1,192.266
7 1,333.1332 0.5388 0.3175 1,441.214
9 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1,571.962
0 0.0000 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000 3,894.469
4 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 37,836.27
68 37,836.276
8 2.7401 0.0000 37,904.77
97 Mobile 4.3016 75.6422 42.2821 0.4039 29.2741 0.1338 29.4080 7.8830 0.1260 8.0089
0.0000 18,795.40
78 18,795.407
8 0.6615 0.2408 18,883.69
23 Energy 0.7307 6.2444 2.6572 0.0399 0.5049 0.5049 0.5049 0.5049
0.0000 1,879.764
1 1,879.7641 0.0838 0.0335 1,891.848
6 Area 37.9225 1.9391 31.8756 0.0117 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 26,127.99 26,127.99 26,127.99 76,465,130 76,465,130 Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 26,127.99 26,127.99 26127.99 76,465,130 76,465,130
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 37,836.27
68 37,836.276
8 2.7401 0.0000 37,904.77
97 Unmitigated 4.3016 75.6422 42.2821 0.4039 29.2741 0.1338 29.4080 7.8830 0.1260 8.0089
0.0000 37,836.27
68 37,836.276
8 2.7401 0.0000 37,904.77
97 Mitigated 4.3016 75.6422 42.2821 0.4039 29.2741 0.1338 29.4080 7.8830 0.1260 8.0089 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.00 13.29 0.41 0.00 13.40 1.42 1.64 3.92 3.85 0.16 16.76 3.75 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.42 1.84 0.86 2.17
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
1,684.655
2 57,365.99
46 59,050.649
8 96.7684 0.4926 61,616.64
55 Total 42.7739 82.2801 76.1572 0.4456 29.2741 0.8152 30.0893 7.8830 0.8073 8.6903 112.6932 1,032.421
8 1,145.1150 0.4346 0.2547 1,231.888
4 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1,571.962
0 0.0000 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000 3,894.469
4 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 37,836.27
68 37,836.276
8 2.7401 0.0000 37,904.77
97 Mobile 4.3016 75.6422 42.2821 0.4039 29.2741 0.1338 29.4080 7.8830 0.1260 8.0089 7,231.738
1 7,231.7381 0.1386 0.1326 7,274.712
7 0.5049 0.5049 0.5049 0.5049 0.0000
0.1043 0.0998 5,473.996
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7307 6.2444 2.6572 0.0399
0.3799 0.3799 0.0000 5,441.659
6 5,441.6596
11,608.97
96 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.5499 4.6988 1.9995 0.0300 0.3799 0.3799
0.0000 0.0000 11,563.66
98 11,563.669
8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5229 0.1082
11,175.87
24 11,175.872
4 0.5053 0.1046 11,219.66
28 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.131442 0.002311 0.001064 0.004434 0.000910 0.000395
SBUS MH
Single Family Housing 0.520917 0.027990 0.176880 0.088790 0.007604 0.003152 0.034112 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
0.00 0.00 100 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Single Family Housing 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW
5,441.6596 5,441.659
6 0.1043 0.0998 5,473.996
7 0.3799 0.3799 0.3799 0.3799 0.0000
0.0998 5,473.996
7 Total 0.5499 4.6988 1.9995 0.0300
0.3799 0.3799 0.0000 5,441.6596 5,441.659
6 1.9995 0.0300 0.3799 0.3799 0.1043
CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
1.01973e+
008
0.5499 4.6988
PM2.5
Total
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO
7,231.738
1 0.1386 0.1326 7,274.712
7 Mitigated
0.5049 0.5049 0.5049 0.0000 7,231.7381
7,274.712
7 Total 0.7307 6.2444 2.6572 0.0399 0.5049
0.5049 0.0000 7,231.7381 7,231.738
1 Single Family 0.0399 0.5049 0.5049 0.5049 0.1386 0.1326 Housing
1.35518e+
008
0.7307 6.2444 2.6572
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
11,219.66
28 Total 11,175.872
4 0.5053 0.1046 11,219.66
28 Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
3.84167e+
007
11,175.872
4 0.5053 0.1046
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
11,608.97
96 Total 11,563.669
8 0.5229 0.1082 11,608.97
96 Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
3.97498e+
007
11,563.669
8 0.5229 0.1082
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
0.0000 1,879.764
1 1,879.7641 0.0838 0.0335 1,891.848
6 Total 37.9225 1.9391 31.8756 0.0117 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 Landscaping 0.9333 0.3602 31.2037 1.6500e- 0.1738 0.1738 0.1738 0.1738 0.0000 51.1956 51.1956 0.0487 0.0000 52.4139 003
0.0000 1,828.568
4 1,828.5684 0.0351 0.0335 1,839.434
7 Hearth 0.1848 1.5789 0.6719 0.0101 0.1277 0.1277 0.1277 0.1277 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
29.6732
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
7.1312
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 1,879.764
1 1,879.7641 0.0838 0.0335 1,891.848
6 Unmitigated 37.9225 1.9391 31.8756 0.0117 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015
0.0000 1,879.764
1 1,879.7641 0.0838 0.0335 1,891.848
6 Mitigated 37.9225 1.9391 31.8756 0.0117 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Unmitigated 1,333.1332 0.5388 0.3175 1,441.2149
Category t
o
MT/yr
Mitigated 1,145.1150 0.4346 0.2547 1,231.8884
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow Shower
0.0000 1,879.764
1 1,879.7641 0.0838 0.0335 1,891.848
6 Total 37.9225 1.9391 31.8756 0.0117 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 0.3015 Landscaping 0.9333 0.3602 31.2037 1.6500e- 0.1738 0.1738 0.1738 0.1738 0.0000 51.1956 51.1956 0.0487 0.0000 52.4139 003
0.0000 1,828.568
4 1,828.5684 0.0351 0.0335 1,839.434
7 Hearth 0.1848 1.5789 0.6719 0.0101 0.1277 0.1277 0.1277 0.1277 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
29.6732
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
7.1312
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1,231.888
4 Total 1,145.1150 0.4346 0.2547 1,231.888
4 Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
318.521 /
521.544
1,145.1150 0.4346 0.2547
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
1,441.214
9 Total 1,333.1332 0.5388 0.3175 1,441.214
9 Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
398.151 /
555.425
1,333.1332 0.5388 0.3175
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3,894.469
4 Total 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000 3,894.469
4 Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
7744 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000 3,894.4694
ton
MT/yr
Mitigated 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000 3,894.4694
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power
3,894.469
4 Total 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000 3,894.469
4 Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
7744 1,571.9620 92.9003 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Water And Wastewater - Based on water demand and wastewater data provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.
Solid Waste - Based on information provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers.Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation -
1.3 User Entered Comments
Only CalEEMod defaults were used.Project Characteristics - Land Use - Based on Dual Land Use secnario.Vehicle Trips - Based on ADT and VMT data povided by Fehr & Peers.Woodstoves - Assumes no woodstoves.
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Floor Surface Area Population
Single Family Housing 4,221.00 Dwelling Unit 823.55 7,597,800.00 12072
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 10:20 PM Operation-Residential - Fresno County, Summary Report
Operation-Residential
Fresno, Summary Report
Exceed Significance?
Significance Threshold
59,050.6498 96.7684 0.4926 61,616.6437
Total
Operational 2040 61,416.5438 96.9244 0.5918 64,016.0060 CH4 N2O CO2e
GHG Activity Year MT/yr
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2
3.0 Annual GHG Emissions
Annual GHG
Annual GHG
Unmitigated Mitigated
Exceed Significance?Air District Threshold
246.8301 S 482.4177 W 627.5282 S 2.7466 S 172.9924 W 52.1854 W 165.8660 W 45.0590 W
Peak Daily Total 247.8212 S 490.8872 W 631.1323 S 2.8007 S 173.6771 W 52.8702 WOff-Site Mobile 27.2729 S 414.1588 W 253.4768 S 2.3181 S 165.8660 W 45.0590 W 27.2729 S 414.1588 W 253.4768 S 2.3181 S
3.0129 S 25.7466 S 10.9560 S 0.1643 S 2.0816 S 2.0816 S
5.0448 S 5.0448 S
On-Site Energy 4.0040 S 34.2161 S 14.5601 S 0.2184 S 2.7664 S 2.7664 S
5.0448 S 5.0448 S 216.5443 S 42.5123 S 363.0955 S 0.2642 S PM2.5
Operational Activity lb/day
On-Site Area 216.5443 S 42.5123 S 363.0955 S 0.2642 S
PM2.5 ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10
Peak Daily Operational Emissions
Unmitigated Mitigated
ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10
Peak Daily Operational Emissions
Vehicle Emission Factors -
2.0 Peak Daily Emissions
Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors -
No Land Use Improve Destination Accessibility 0.00
No Land Use Improve Walkability Design 0.00No Land Use Increase Diversity -0.01 0.13 Input Value 3
No Land Use Increase Density 0.00
Mitigation
Selected
Category Measure % Reduction Input Value 1 Input Value 2
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Operational Mobile Mitigation
Project Setting:
14.52 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 20.00 13.41 14.10 19.34 19.77
24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75
Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 Natural Gas 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.76 24.75 24.75 0.00 24.75
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.35 3.35 3.36 3.35
Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 Electricity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.35
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Operational Percent Reduction Summary
Category ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1
Date: 7/31/2017 10:19 PM
Operation-Residential
Fresno County, Mitigation Report
Total VMT Reduction 0.00
No School Trip Implement School Bus Program 0.00
Commute Commute Subtotal 0.00
No Commute Provide Ride Sharing ProgramNo Commute Employee Vanpool/Shuttle 0.00 2.00No Commute Market Commute Trip Reduction Option 0.00No Commute Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules
0.00 No Commute Workplace Parking ChargeNo Commute Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out"No Commute Transit SubsidyNo Commute Implement Trip Reduction Program Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal 0.00
Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Subtotal 0.00 No Transit Improvements Increase Transit Frequency 0.00No Transit Improvements Expand Transit Network 0.00No Transit Improvements Provide BRT System 0.00 Parking Policy Pricing Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal 0.00 No Parking Policy Pricing On-street Market Pricing 0.00No Parking Policy Pricing Unbundle Parking Costs 0.00No Parking Policy Pricing Limit Parking Supply 0.00 Neighborhood Enhancements Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal 0.00 No Neighborhood Enhancements Implement NEV Network 0.00No Neighborhood Enhancements Provide Traffic Calming MeasuresNo Neighborhood Enhancements Improve Pedestrian Network Land Use Land Use SubTotal 0.00
No Land Use Integrate Below Market Rate Housing 0.00No Land Use Increase Transit Accessibility 0.25 Refrigerator 15.00
DishWasher 15.00Fan 50.00Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % ImprovementClothWasher 30.00 No Install High Efficiency LightingNo On-site Renewable Energy Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented Mitigation Measure Input Value 1 Input Value 2 Yes Exceed Title 24 28.00
No % Electric LeafblowerNo % Electric ChainsawNo Use Low VOC Paint (Parking) 150.00No % Electric LawnmowerNo Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior) 150.00No Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior) 150.00No Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior) 150.00No Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior) 150.00No No HearthNo Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Area Mitigation
Measure Implemented Mitigation Measure Input Value
No Only Natural Gas Hearth
Solid Waste Mitigation
Mitigation Measures Input ValueInstitute Recycling and Composting ServicesPercent Reduction in Waste Disposed Yes Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems 6.10
No Water Efficient Landscape 0.00 0.00
Yes Install low-flow Shower 20.00
No Turf Reduction 0.00
Yes Install low-flow Kitchen faucet 18.00Yes Install low-flow Toilet 20.00 No Use Grey Water 0.00
Yes Install low-flow bathroom faucet 32.00
Input Value 2
No Apply Water Conservation on Strategy 0.00 0.00No Use Reclaimed Water 0.00 0.00 Water Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented Mitigation Measure Input Value 1
........................................................................................................................
A PPENDIX D
C ULTURAL R ESOURCES
........................................................................................................................
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND RESOURCE
ASSESSMENT: CULTURAL RESOURCES
SOUTHWEST FRESNO SPECIFIC PLAN
Prepared for:
Kyle Simpson
PLACEWORKS, Inc.
1865 Herndon Avenue, Suite K
Fresno, CA 93611
(559) 575-4338
Prepared by:
C. Kristina Roper, M.A., RPA
Jon L. Brady, M.A., William B. Secrest, Jr., and Justin M. Brady Sierra Valley Cultural Planning
40854 Oak Ridge Drive
Three Rivers, CA 93271
July 2017
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................2
2.0 SETTING .............................................................................................................................3
2.1 The Natural Environment...................................................................................................4
2.2 The Prehistoric Period.......................................................................................................4
2.3 The Ethnographic Period...................................................................................................6
2.4 Historic Period...................................................................................................................7
2.4.1 The Early Years..........................................................................................................7
2.4.2 The Colony System in Fresno County: 1875-1903......................................................8
2.4.3 West Fresno: 1900-1945 ..........................................................................................10
2.4.4 Social Development within the SFSP........................................................................11
2.4.5. West Fresno and Fresno-At-Large ..........................................................................12
2.5 Ethnic Context.................................................................................................................13
2.5.1 Phase I: The Small-Scale Farmers ...........................................................................13
2.5.2 Phase II: African American Dominance ....................................................................14
2.5.3 Phase III: The Melting Pot ........................................................................................15
3.0 EXISTING RESOURCES....................................................................................................16
3.1 Records Search ..............................................................................................................16
3.1.1 Cultural Resources Previously Identified within the SFSP Study Area......................17
3.1.2 Windshield Survey and Documents Search of the SFSP Study Area .......................17
4.0 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION...............................................................................18
5.0 OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS.............................18
5.1 Opportunities...................................................................................................................23
5.2 Constraints......................................................................................................................23
5.3 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................23 REFERENCES CITED..............................................................................................................24 QUALIFICATIONS OF PREPARERS .......................................................................................27 ATTACHMENT 1: Records Search Results
ATTACHMENT 2: Southwest Fresno Properties Spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT 3: Native American Consultation
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Fresno has contracted with Placeworks, Inc., to prepare a program level EIR for the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan. This Plan serves as the first major planning effort and environmental review to focus on major issues such as land use planning, development and design, parks and open space, transportation, and utilities for the Southwest Fresno area. The EIR will include, among other components a summary of existing conditions and resource assessments of the physical setting, biological and cultural resources, infrastructure and hydrology, traffic and circulation, as well as opportunities and constraints.
The area addressed by the Plan lies within the southwestern most part of the city of Fresno, within Fresno County (see Figure 1). The Southwest Fresno Specific Plan Area (SFSP) is located at the southwest portion of the City of Fresno and bordered by Highway 180, Highway 99, and Highway 41. Immediately surrounding the Specific Plan Area to the west and south are unincorporated parts of Fresno County. The Specific Plan Area only includes land within the existing city’s limits and is approximately a total of 3140 acres. Farther to the west are the City of Kerman and the Fresno‐Clovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility. To the east beyond Highway 99 and Highway 41 are Downtown Fresno and the remaining parts of Fresno along with many other cities within Fresno County, including Clovis, Fowler, and Selma.
The purpose of a Specific Plan is to develop policies, programs, regulations, and guidelines to implement the jurisdiction’s adopted General Plan. A Specific Plan effectively establishes a link between implementing policies of the General Plan and the individual development proposals in a defined area. The Plan implements the goals and policies set forth in the City of Fresno General Plan (General Plan) by building upon its concepts for the Southwest Development Area. The SFSP also includes ideas and measures that have been extensively tailored and reviewed by the Southwest Fresno community and stakeholders. The SFSP provides guiding principles, policies, development criteria, and implementation strategies to coordinate private development and public improvements given the unique opportunities and characteristics of this important part of the city of Fresno.
Sierra Valley Cultural Planning (SVCP) has completed a cultural resources assessment for the SFSP to satisfy the requirements of CEQA. Specific tasks included:
• a search of archaeological base maps, records, and reports on file at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center at CSU Bakersfield;
• review of reports on file with SVCP and local historic records repositories; • consultation with local historical societies and individuals with knowledge of the area’s history;
• consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission and local Native American groups; and;
• spot-checking of potential historic sites.
This report summarizes known information of documented cultural resources and provides an historic context for evaluation of cultural resources. It includes attachments which document building construction during the historic era, locations of known and suspected historic structure sites, and cultural resources records for documented resources within the study area.
Study Area
Figure 1. Southwest Fresno Specific Plan Study Area.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 4
2.0 SETTING
2.1 The Natural Environment
Initially agricultural land, Southwest Fresno has gradually transitioned with more residential, industrial, and commercial uses sprinkled throughout. Today, Southwest Fresno is made up of a patchwork of land uses that abut each other, including subdivisions, industry, and farmland.
Topography of the study area is relatively level, sloping gradually from east to west.
Soils within the area include mainly well-developed sandy loams of the Ramona, Atwater, Greenfield, Borden, Pachappa and San Joaquin series, with lesser inclusions of younger soils of the Delhi, Hanfod, and Hesperia series. Elevation ranges from approximately 260-290 feet above mean sea level.
Prior to EuroAmerican exploration and settlement in the region, the central San Joaquin Valley was extensive grassland covered with spring-flowering herbs. Stands of trees -- sycamore, cottonwoods, box elders and willows -- lined the stream and river courses with groves of valley oaks in well-watered localities with rich soil. Rivers yielded fish, mussels, and pond turtles; migratory waterfowl nested in the dense tules along the river sloughs downstream. When the Spanish first set foot in the area, they found the deer and tule elk trails to be so broad and extensive that they first supposed that the area was occupied by cattle. Grizzly bears occupied the open grassland and riparian corridors on the valley floor and adjacent foothills. Smaller mammals and birds, including jackrabbits, ground squirrels, and quail were abundant. Native Americans occupants of the region describe abundant sedge beds, along with rich areas of deer grass, plants that figure prominently in the construction of Native American basketry items.
2.2 The Prehistoric Period
The San Joaquin Valley and adjacent Sierran foothills and Coast Range have a long and complex cultural history with distinct regional patterns that extend back more than 11,000 years (McGuire 1995). The first generally agreed-upon evidence for the presence of prehistoric peoples in the region is represented by the distinctive basally-thinned and fluted projectile points, found on the margins of extinct lakes in the San Joaquin Valley. These projectiles, often compared to Clovis points, have been found at three localities in the San Joaquin Valley including along the Pleistocene shorelines of former Tulare Lake. Based on evidence from these sites and other well-dated contexts elsewhere, these Paleo-Indian hunters who used these spear points existed during a narrow time range of 11550 cal B.C. to 8550 cal B.C. (Rosenthal et al. 2007).
As a result of climate change at the end of the Pleistocene, a period of extensive deposition occurred throughout the lowlands of central California, burying many older landforms and providing a distinct break between Pleistocene and subsequent occupations during the Holocene. Another period of deposition, also a product of climate change, had similar results around 7550 cal B.C., burying some of the oldest archaeological deposits discovered in California (Rosenthal and Meyer 2004).
The Lower Archaic (8550-5550 cal B.C.) is characterized by an apparent contrast in economies, although it is possible they may be seasonal expressions of the same economy.
Archaeological deposits which date to this period on the valley floor frequently include only large stemmed spear points, suggesting an emphasis on large game such as artiodactyls (Wallace 1991). Recent discoveries in the adjacent Sierra Nevada have yielded distinct milling assemblages which clearly indicate a reliance on plant foods. Investigations at Copperopolis Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 5 (LaJeunesse and Pryor 1996) argue that nut crops were the primary target of seasonal plant exploitation. Assemblages at these foothill sites include dense accumulations of handstones, millingslabs, and various cobble-core tools, representing “frequently visited camps in a seasonally structured settlement system” (Rosenthal et al. 2007:152). During the Lower Archaic, regional interaction spheres were well established. Marine shell from the central California coast has been found in early Holocene contexts in the Great Basin east of the Sierra Nevada, and eastern Sierra obsidian comprises a large percentage of flaked stone debitage and tools recovered from sites on both sides of the Sierra (Rosenthal et al. 2007:152).
About 8,000 years ago, many California cultures shifted the main focus of their subsistence strategies from hunting to nut and seed gathering, as evidenced by the increase in food-grinding implements found in archeological sites dating to this period. This cultural pattern is best known for southern California, where it has been termed the Milling Stone Horizon (Wallace 1954, 1978a), but recent studies suggest that the horizon may be more widespread than originally described and is found throughout the central region during the Middle Archaic Period. Dates associated with this period vary between 9,000 and 2,000 cal BP, although most cluster in the 6,800 to 4,500 cal BP range (Basgall and True 1985).
On the valley floor, early Middle Archaic sites are relatively rare; this changes significantly toward the end of the Middle Archaic. In central California late Middle Archaic settlement focused on river courses on the valley floor. “Extended residential settlement at these sites is indicated by refined and specialized tool assemblages and features, a wide range of nonutilitarian artifacts, abundant trade objects, and plant and animal remains indicative of year-round occupation” (Rosenthal et al. 2007:154). Again, climate change apparently influence this shift, with warmer, drier conditions prevailing throughout California. The shorelines of many lakes, including Tulare Lake, contracted substantially, while at the same time rising sea levels favored the expansion of the San Joaquin/Sacramento Delta region, with newly formed wetlands extending eastward from the San Francisco Bay.
In contrast with rare early Middle Archaic sites on the valley floor, early Middle Archaic sites are relatively common in the Sierran foothills, and their recovered, mainly utilitarian assemblages show relatively little change from the preceding period with a continued emphasis on acorns and pine nuts. Few bone or shell artifacts, beads, or ornaments have been recovered from these localities. Projectile points from this period reflect a high degree of regional morphological variability, with an emphasis on local toolstone material supplemented with a small amount of obsidian from eastern sources. In contrast with the more elaborate mortuary assemblages and extended burial mode documented at Valley sites, burials sites documented at some foothill sites such as CA-FRE-61 on Wahtoke Creek are reminiscent of “re-burial” features reported from Milling Stone Horizon sites in southern California. These reburials are characterized by re-interment of incomplete skeletons often capped with inverted millingstones (McGuire 1995:57).
A return to colder and wetter conditions marked the Upper Archaic in Central California (550 cal B.C. to cal A.D. 1100). Previously desiccated lakes returned to spill levels and increased freshwater flowed in the San Joaquin and Sacramento watershed. Cultural patterns as reflected in the archeological record, particularly specialized subsistence practices, emerged during this period. The archeological record becomes more complex, as specialized adaptations to locally available resources were developed and valley populations expanded into the lower Sierran foothills. New and specialized technologies expanded and distinct shell bead types occurred across the region. The range of subsistence resources utilized and exchange systems expanded significantly from the previous period. In the Central Valley, archaeological evidence Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 6 of social stratification and craft specialization is indicated by well-made artifacts such as charmstones and beads, often found as mortuary items.
The period between approximately cal A.D. 1000 and Euro-American contact is referred to as the Emergent Period. The Emergent Period is marked by the introduction of bow and arrow technology which replaced the dart and atlatl at about cal A.D. 1000 and 1300. In the San Joaquin region, villages and small residential sites developed along the many stream courses in the lower foothills and along the river channels and sloughs of the valley floor. A local form of pottery was developed in the southern Sierran foothills along the Kaweah River.
Archaeological excavations at habitation sites in Merced and Fresno counties have revealed an artifact assemblage belonging to the Yokuts groups who inhabited the valley floor and adjacent foothills into historic times (Olsen and Payen 1968, 1969; Pritchard 1970).
2.3 The Ethnographic Period
Prior to Euro American settlement, most of the San Joaquin Valley and its bordering foothills of the Sierra Nevada and Diablo Range were inhabited by speakers of Yokutsan languages. The majority of the Valley Yokuts people lived on the eastern side of the San Joaquin Valley. The study area falls within the territory of the Gashowu (also referred to as Casson in the 1851 Treaty of Camp Barbour and in the 1933 Roll of California Indians [National Archives 1933]). The Gashowu, a Tribe of the Kings River Yokuts group of the Foothill Yokuts division, occupied Auberry Valley and the drainages that flowed into the Fresno-Clovis area including Little Dry Creek, Sales Creek, Dog Creek, Big Dry Creek, Red Bank Creek, and Fancher Creek. Some of these creeks also fed into the San Joaquin Valley near the present day cities of Fresno and Clovis (Kroeber 1925:Plate 47; Latta 1999; Wallace 1978b). Known ethnographic villages included Pohoniu, near Letcher; Yokau, on Auberry Road two and half miles north of its intersection with Millerton Road; and Oto at the present day Table Mountain Rancheria (Figure 4).
The Native American occupants of the San Joaquin Valley and adjoining Sierran foothills were hunters and gatherers who depended upon the seasonal procurement of locally abundant vegetal and faunal resources. As with their neighboring tribes, the Gashowu lived in permanently established villages during most of the year, usually between the months of October and May (Gayton 1930:365). During the rest of the year, the Gashowu would move across their territory, tracking seasonally available plant resources as well as game and fish.
Their principal villages were situated along permanent stream courses, while temporary camp sites and special use areas were scattered throughout their territory. Bedrock milling sites, the most visible vestige of Native American occupation, were located in rock boulders and outcrops above perennial stream courses and in scattered locations throughout the Fresno Plains along intermittent stream courses where conditions favored the presence of localized pools or wells of fresh water (Meighan and Dillon 1987:326-327). At the time of contact in the late 1700s, the abundance of resources in the valley and adjoining foothills provided a nearly sedentary life, with high population density typically limited elsewhere to agricultural adaptations (Baumhoff 1963).
Numerous accounts of Valley Yokuts life ways offer details of pre-European land use in the San Joaquin Valley. The reader is referred to Gayton (1930, 1948), Kroeber (1925), Latta (1999), McCarthy (1995), Spier (1978) and Wallace (1978b) for additional information on precontact Yokuts subsistence and culture.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 7 Figure 2. Northern Valley Yokuts Village Locations (from Kroeber 1925: Plate 47).
.
2.4 Historic Period
The following brief narrative chronicles both the social and commercial history of the SFSP area between 1860 and 2000.
2.4.1 The Early Years
Fresno County, formed in 1856, was carved from portions of Mariposa, Merced, and Tulare counties. The original county seat for the county was established at Millerton in 1856. In 1874, the city of Fresno – established in 1872 by the Central Pacific Railroad – had become the county seat and was incorporated by 1885.
The Central Pacific Railroad, having completed the western segment of the Transcontinental Railroad, decided to connect the northern part of the state with Los Angeles (Eaton 1965: ix). The railroad line would traverse Fresno County with its principal stop being located at Sycamore (now Herndon) on the San Joaquin River. Construction crews commenced work on the rail line on December 31, 1869. During an inspection tour, several officials of the Central Pacific Railroad including its director, Leland Stanford, visited the 2,000 acre ranch of A.
J. Easterby (Clough and Secrest 1984:121). Upon seeing the fields of “gently-waving green grain,” Stanford exclaimed “Wonderful! Here we must build the town” (Eaton 1965). The new site was located in the “Sinks of the Dry Creek,” the lowest spot between the San Joaquin and the Kings rivers (Clough and Secrest 1984:121; Eaton 1965).
Project Study
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 8 Shortly after Leland Stanford’s visit to Easterby’s ranch, the Contract and Finance Company (a real estate subsidiary of Central Pacific) purchased 4,480 acres of land from the so-called German Syndicate of which Easterby was a member. This group of German-born residents of San Francisco had previously purchased 80,000 acres from William S. Chapman (Eaton 1965: ix; Clough and Secrest 1984:121).
By the spring of 1873 track had been laid as far as the new town site of Fresno. In April 1873 Fresno had side tracks and a turning table. Over the course of the next month the town site was surveyed by Edward H. Mix. It was divided into “302- by 400-foot blocks, with 25- by 150-foot lots and twenty-foot alleys” (Eaton 1965; Clough and Secrest 1984:121). The cost of individual lots was dependent upon location – lots ranged from $60 to $250. Within two years the city boasted of having “four general stores, two fruit stores, one drugstore, three hotels, two restaurants, six saloons, two law offices, two physicians, one tinsmith, one saddleshop, two butcher shops, three blacksmiths, one tailor, the Expositor, and twenty-five private residences” (Clough and Secrest 1984:122).
While the city’s beginnings are directly linked to the presence of the railroad in the San Joaquin Valley, it was the development of the colony system and agriculture that made Fresno the leading agricultural center of the San Joaquin Valley.
2.4.2 The Colony System in Fresno County: 1875-1903
The colony system involved land speculation where investors, generally not from the San Joaquin Valley, purchased large tracts of land and divided them into 20- and 40-acre lots and sold them to prospective buyers from the east. Most buyers were interested in establishing small-scale farms. Real estate agents, especially from the San Francisco area, promoted excursions to Fresno that were often successful for the agents and those they represented.
According to one source the “…arrival of newcomers greatly accelerated the growth of the outlying districts” (Thickens 1942:56).
The model for future agricultural colonies in Fresno and ultimately the San Joaquin Valley was the Central California Colony, established in 1875 (Figure 3). The colony was located south of Fresno and encompassed approximately 3,840 acres. Bernard Marks, who had been a miner and a principal at the Lincoln School in San Francisco, was able to convince William S. Chapman, who owned much of the land in the valley, that a self-contained irrigated colony could be a profitable venture. Chapman reached an agreement with Marks whereby twenty-one square miles of the best land would be at the heart of their scheme. Of this 3,840 acres south of Fresno was divided into 192 20-acre lots. The size of each lot was to be oneeighth mile wide and one-quarter of a mile long (Thickens 1942:24).
Located north of the Central California Colony was the Fresno Colony established by Thomas E. Hughes. The colony was bounded by California Avenue on the north, Fruit Avenue on the west, North Avenue to the south and East Avenue on the east. The colony acreage totaled 2,880 acres and was subdivided into 144 20-acres lots (Clough and Secrest 1984:144).
Hughes, realizing the success of the Central Colony, decided to undertake a similar project and subsequently contracted with Edmund Janssen for nine and one-half sections of land from which the Fresno Colony was laid out. Before the purchase could be finalized, Janssen died.
Hughes eventually purchased the nine and one-half sections of land from Janssen’s widow for $40,000 or about $6.50 per acre; however, the land was without water for irrigation. Hughes addressed this problem by proposing that in return for water rights and water distribution for the Fresno Colony he would transfer ownership of five other sections of land to M. J. Church (Winchell 1933:140).
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 9 Figure 3. 1885 Map depicting Colony Development around the City of Fresno.
Once Hughes had settled the water issue, he commenced to advertise the availability of the lots within the Fresno Colony. Hughes was able to make arrangements with the railroad company to run excursions to the Fresno area. On one of these excursions over 300 people made trip; the success of the Central Colony greatly impressed many of the visitors, resulting in the sale of a number of lots at $50 per acre. At the end of three months over one-third of the lots were sold. Over time all of the lots were purchased (Winchell 1933:140; Walker 1941:44).
In 1885, several other colonies were established in the general vicinity of the current study area. These included the California Colony (later known as the West Park Colony), the Union Colony, and the Fruitvale Estate (Kearney 1885; Map of Colony System, nd). The California Colony was originally proposed by M.J. Church, who had purchased 6,240 acres of land from both William Chapman and Thomas E. Hughes. It would later be known as the West Park Colony. According to Thompson’s 1891 Atlas of Fresno County the colony was also known as the Bank of California Tract. This tract of land bordered the western edge of the Union Colony and the Central California Colony. The Union Colony was much smaller the any of the other three colonies mentioned above, the total acreage being only 960 acres (Kearney 1885).
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 10 The Fruitvale Estate of M. Theodore Kearney, which included 7,000 acres of productive agricultural land, originally extended east as far as present-day South Marks Avenue and as far north as present-day West Madison Avenue. Kearney, who had purchased the land in 1883, irrigated the lands extensively while subdividing over half of the acreage for immediate sale.
Most of the lots along present-day West Madison Avenue were 10-acre lots. If the buyers, however, even after making improvements on the land, could not make their payments, Kearney was not above foreclosing on a family.
By 1903, 48 separate colonies or tracts were established in Fresno County representing approximately 71,080 acres (Panter 1994:9). These colonies helped break up the vast estates and initiated what agricultural historian Donald Pisani has termed "the horticultural small-farm phase" of California agriculture (Datel 1999:97).
2.4.3 West Fresno: 1900-1945
During this period southwest Fresno remained largely dedicated to agriculture. Small farms continued to dominate the project area up to 1945; however, during this period it became evident that famers were willing to sell their land to investors who were intent on developing both residential and commercial/industrial properties.
In 1888 Block 9 of the Fresno Colony was once again subdivided into what was known as the Long Brothers Addition. This new subdivision consisted of four blocks containing 50 parcels on each block (200 lots total). By the mid-1940s less than half of the lots in the Long Brothers Addition had buildings located on them, with most of these being concentrated around California Avenue. By 1961 most of the lots were developed with single-family residences. In the 1990s many of the extant buildings were demolished. By 1998 only approximately 10 historic-era buildings remained; today there are none (Thompson 1891, Guard 1913; Progressive Map Service 1920, 1935).
While Block 9/the Long Brothers Addition was subdivided just eight years after the Fresno Colony was established, Block 10 would wait another 64 years before it was once again subdivided. In 1944 The Alta Vista Homes Company subdivided block 10 into 60 individual lots of varying sizes. At the time of the subdivision California Heights remained vacant land with no trees, infrastructure, or buildings in place. By 1950 the subdivision included dirt and paved roads, some trees, and buildings, including the Bethel Mission Church. By 1961 all of the roads had been paved and almost all of the lots had buildings on them. Although most of the historicera building just east (Block 9/ Long Brothers Addition) has been demolished, today, most of the buildings constructed in the California Heights subdivision in the 1940s through the 1960s remain.
Some of the other residential tracts to be developed within the study area included: The El Capitan Tract (1911); the Golden Lind Tract (1913); the Buena Vista Tract (n.d.); the South Fig Avenue Heights Tract (1944); and the Sunset Terrace (1946) (Guard 1911; Harvey 1913; Progressive Map Service 1920 and 1935).
By the late 1930s, a boom occurred in residential construction in southwest Fresno. A number of housing tracts were being laid out, ultimately resulting in the construction of new housing. A review of the 1939 Fresno City directory shows an increase in the number of residences within the study area. As noted previously, some of these housing developments were concentrated along North and Jensen avenues (historicalaerials.com). By 1951-1952, residential construction had increased substantially (R.L. Polk & Company, 1939; 1951-52). In 1964, the largest housing developments were concentrated along Jensen Avenue between Elm Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 11 and Fig avenues, as well as between South Knight and South Fruit avenues north of Jensen Avenue. On North Avenue, in 1964, the largest concentration of residential tracts was located between West Roy and East Samson avenues. Beyond these housing developments, most of the project area remained dedicated to agriculture.
Along with residential development within the project area, commercial and light industrial development was beginning to expand into West Fresno from the downtown area.
Areas of industrial expansion after World War II increased especially along Elm Avenue west of present day State Route 99 and along Whitesbridge Road from Thorne Avenue to Marks Avenue. Most of this development came following World War II. Commencing in the late 1980s, southwest Fresno saw a significant increase in both commercial and light industrial development as property values in this area have remained relatively stable due to the availability of land.
In 1937, The City of Fresno established the Fresno Sanitary Landfill (FSL) on 20 acres located in the southwest portion of the SFSP study area. By the time of its closure in 1987, it had expanded to 140 acres bounded on the north by Jensen Avenue, on the east by West Avenue, on the south by North Avenue, and on the west by agricultural lands east of Marks Avenue (Figure 4). The FSL was designed by Jean Vincenz who served as commissioner of public works, city engineer, and manager of utilities in Fresno from 1931 to 1941. Prior to establishment of the FSL, the City contracted with the Fresno Disposal Company which operated an incinerator. The FSL established the prototype for the modern sanitary landfill in the United States. “Vincenz's design, incorporating the trench method, layering of waste and dirt, and daily covering of the fill area introduced a method of disposal that for its time provided a systematic and hygienic method of disposal through the use of the best technology available.
No other solid waste disposal option was as widely utilized in the United States and elsewhere as the sanitary landfill. And although the method has drawn criticism in recent years, there is not likely to be a single disposal option developed for many years that will attain such universal acceptance and use” (Melosi 2000). The FSL is a National Historic Landmark and listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Figure 4. Fresno Sanitary Landfill
2.4.4 Social Development within the SFSP
Fresno has always had an ethnically diverse population and nowhere is that more prevalent than in the study area. Through archival research several groups have been identified including Germans, Chinese, Armenians, Japanese, African Americans, and Hispanic/Latinos.
Germans began arriving in Fresno County around 1887. Many of these arrivals were from Russia where they had settled along the Volga River as early as the 1760s. Many of these Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 12 recent arriving immigrants were farmers in the Old Country, while others were skilled laborers or craftsmen. According to Thompson’s 1891 Atlas of Fresno County a large number of families identified where of German descent. The 1890 U.S. Census Report also notes the presence of families with Danish and English surnames located in the study area as well.
Although there is an absence of Chinese surnames appearing in the roles of property ownership during the latter 1800s within the study area, there were nonetheless a large pool of laborers of Chinese descent in the Fresno area. M. Theodore Kearney was known to have Chinese laborers working on his Fruitvale Estate. While he had both white and Chinese laborers, he provided separate living quarters for both groups. Archival records suggest that few if any Chinese families were able to purchase land within the study area during the late 1800s and early 1900s.
During the latter 1800s and early 1900s, Armenians made their way to America, with many coming to Fresno County, escaping the poor conditions of their homeland. For the Armenians, assimilation into American culture was much easier than that of the Chinese. First, most Chinese arriving in California were male and many arrived already planning their return to the homeland. For Armenians the primary social unit was the family. They were a Christian and Caucasian people, consequently their assimilation into American culture was much smoother (Hamilton et al. 2014:29). While the number of Armenian families owning property in the study area during the 1880s and 1890s was small, ownership of property during the first two decades of the 20th century increased significantly.
Japanese immigration to America was not unlike that of the Chinese, as the initial immigrants were laborers. Japanese farm laborers were drawn to Fresno County during the latter 1880s and 1890s. They were welcomed to the area due to the lack of Chinese laborers resulting from the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The Japanese community settled within the Fresno city limits in an area bounded by present-day State Route 99, Tulare, Mono and G streets. Many found work on large and small farms alike (Brady and Hattersley-Drayton 2003:12; Bulbulian 2001:34).
As with the Armenians, Japanese families invested their money in land. During the first two decades of the 20th century, Japanese families were purchasing land and planting vineyards and orchards across the county. There were not a significant number of families located within the study area during the early years of the 20th century, but in the last 50 years the number of families owning farms in the study area has grown substantially.
One of the last ethnic groups to make inroads into land ownership within the study area was Hispanics/Latinos. Many Hispanic/Latinos could be found in the older neighborhoods located in the study area. Archival research suggests that most Hispanic/Latinos living in southwest Fresno were purchasing or renting residential property. One such area was the located within the California Heights subdivision located west of South Walnut Avenue. During the 1940s and 1950s, this subdivision was home to one of the few Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods within the study area. The number of Hispanic/Latino families within the study area has grown substantially over the last 50 years. An expanded consideration of the ethnic makeup of the study area is presented in the following section 2.5 Ethnic Context.
2.4.5. West Fresno and Fresno-At-Large
Since its incorporation in 1885, the City of Fresno has continued to expand north, west and east. With the advent of affordable public transportation in Fresno, moving north into new subdivisions was made more attractive as well as more affordable, as housing prices during the Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 13 latter 1800s were controlled, in part, by housing availability. Consequently, Fresno’s growth along with urban sprawl has invariably focused on the north, rather than to the east and west.
Only the San Joaquin River has posed a barrier to City of Fresno’s growth north of the downtown area that was once both the hub of both commercial and residential expansion. As a consequence the expansion into southwest Fresno and the study area has been slower. It is only in the last 30 years that expansion into West Fresno has become more prevalent.
In summary, the study area initially had its beginnings in the colony system – an area dedicated to 20 and 40-acre parcels that were home to many of Fresno’s new arrivals from other parts of the world. It was here that families of many different ethnic backgrounds were able to purchase land and raise families on their farms. It was here that families were able to experience both social and economic freedoms not afforded to them in their native lands.
Consequently, most families continued to farm their lands for several generations. Land ownership was slow to change.
While there was some residential tracts established in the study area prior to 1940, it was not until after WWII that both residential and commercial development began to take hold in the study area. Today, there is greater investment in the Southwest Fresno study area in both residential and commercial development. Although there are still large parts of the study area that remain dedicated to farming, urban sprawl seems to finally be making its mark on the land.
2.5 Ethnic Context
Assembling the ethnic history of the SFSP is a challenging task for several reasons.
With much of the area populated by farmers, the working poor and the poverty-stricken, most of the residents have been occupied by other concerns and have not managed to write histories or reminiscences that lend perspective to the area’s past. While there have been local journals that have recorded some of the narrative, such as the California Advocate newspaper and Grapevine magazine, their coverage extended mostly to the African American community and only for a portion of the area’s recorded history. Finally, coverage by mainstream journalism (namely, The Fresno Bee) has been spotty since the 1960s and almost nonexistent before that time. Increasing interest in West Fresno since the civil rights era has helped fill this gap but there are, of course, many missing decades.
However, by making reference to some basic local history tools—namely, the Fresno County property atlases, the United States Census, and certain of the Bee’s articles—it is possible to reconstruct a broad-brush portrait of changing ethnicities within the SFSP. If the result is necessarily incomplete, at least it gives an idea of how the area and its residential composition has evolved, and delineates three distinct stages of development.
2.5.1 Phase I: The Small-Scale Farmers
Settlement of the SFSP commenced in the early 1870s, when the city of Fresno was founded and farmers began purchasing tracts and individual lots of land. The “colony” system, where a major investor or investors resold farming lots to individual purchasers, was inaugurated by Bernhard Marks’s Central California Colony (1875), an enterprise whose northern boundaries impinged on the SFSP. Within this same area, the Marks enterprise— which was highly successful, and a forerunner of similar operations instituted throughout Fresno County—was followed by the Fresno, West Park and Union colonies during the 1880s.
A reading of the aforementioned county property atlases discloses the SFSP’s earlier settlement patterns. Thomas H. Thompson’s Fresno County atlas (1891), especially the plates illustrating the eastern half of Township 14 South, Range 19 East and the northern half of Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 14 Township 14 South, Range 20 East, show that some of Fresno’s most prominent citizens were early landholders in the neighborhood. Among them were irrigation pioneers Moses J. Church and Ingvart Teilman, large-scale grain farmer August Weihe, entrepreneur Fulton G. Berry (for whom Fresno’s Fulton Street was named), jeweler H.C. Warner, and attorney (and onetime California chief justice) David S. Terry.
In the space of fifteen years or so, when William Harvey’s property atlas appeared (1907), the agricultural landscape began to change noticeably. While Teilman, Berry and Weihe (among others) remained in the district, older owners were selling off their holdings. The average acreage of the area’s farms was decreasing, with 20- and 40-acre lots becoming increasingly common. Significantly, Armenians were beginning to take up noticeable sections of the whole; among the names mentioned by Harvey are M. Nahigian, M. Surabian, R. Damirgian, and G. Ohanessian.
By the 1920s and 1930s (Progressive 1920, 1936), further changes were afoot.
Armenians came to occupy perhaps a fifth of the area’s land; Japanese and Italians, who had begun a sizeable migration to Fresno County circa 1910, were occupying much of the SFSP; and the profusion of 10- and 20-acre farms was readily evident. The Japanese tended to occupy the area west of Chandler Field, the municipal airport established in 1929; and the Italians were becoming noticeable in the southern sections, along with Germans and occasional Slavs.
When the United States entered World War II, what would eventually become the SFSP could fairly be described as a diverse, multi-ethnic agricultural neighborhood—albeit, one first occupied by native Americans, with more recent immigrants entering the mix as the decades went by. Save for the Japanese, the farmers were also mostly white.
2.5.2 Phase II: African American Dominance
Greater Fresno’s African American population, minuscule before the Depression, began to grow substantially after that time. The reasons for this phenomenon are stated hazily in the available historical record. Kuhn (1964) put it thus: “They have moved to the area from Texas and Oklahoma and elsewhere, hoping to find a better, easier life. Instead, they have found only another cotton field at the end of the rainbow.” This was certainly true of the Black Okies of south-central Fresno County and Kings County, a group whose background was highly obscure until Mark Arax’s 2002 Los Angeles Times articles brought it wider attention.
Clemings (2001) offered another frustratingly vague explanation of this phenomenon:
“African-Americans moved into the area in large numbers after World War II. Many of them were immigrants, too, moving to California in search of opportunities that had been denied them elsewhere.” When an adequate history of Fresno’s African Americans is written—none yet exist—perhaps some telling details will surface at last.
African Americans settled to the west and south of West Fresno’s Chinese-JapaneseLatino-Volga German-Italian core. This eventually came to include much of the SFSP, especially when a number of low-income housing developments began to open in the 1950s and 1960s. While some African Americans did open up smaller businesses and became entrepreneurs, their commercial activities centered on the traditional precincts of West Fresno.
Those among them who lived in the SFSP inhabited largely residential tracts.
Kuhn (1964), excerpting 1960 U.S. Census figures, showed how dominant the African American was along the SFSP’s southern sectors. Census Tract 9, centering on the old Fresno and Central California colonies’ acreages, was roughly 60 percent African American and 30 Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 15 percent Hispanic/Latino. Tract 10, adjoining Tract 9 to the south, had an African American population of 79.1 percent. He added, in a note of appropriate bleakness: “It, of all the tracts, fit any specifications for an economic and racial ghetto.”
Prejudice, the difficulties of the seasonal labor market, and a lack of educational attainment took their toll on Fresno’s African Americans. Along with the Highway City and Malaga neighborhoods, the SFSP became one of the metropolitan area’s most poverty-stricken zones. By the early 1960s, more than half of Fresno’s African American population of 15,000 was living on the West Side, many of them in economically desperate circumstances (Bort 1963).
2.5.3 Phase III: The Melting Pot
For the rest of the 1960s and the 1970s, the SFSP’s neighborhoods remained predominantly African American, but a noticeable shift was in the works. “The seven census tracts generally covering the west Fresno area are bounded roughly by Southern Pacific Railroad tracks on the east, Belmont Avenue on the north, Marks Avenue on the west and Central Avenue on the south. In those tracts, African-Americans constituted 63.5 percent of the population in 1980. Last year, the share was down to 48.6 percent” (Steinberg 1991).
The decline in the African American population was partially due to a combined Hispanic/Latino and Southeast Asian influx. In the 1980-1990 period, the percentage of Hispanics/Latinos in Tract 9 jumped from 16 percent to 27.4 percent, and the percentage of Asians from 0.3 to 15.5—a staggering more-than fifty-fold increase in only ten years. No doubt the Asian influx was triggered by the 1975 collapse of Laos and South Vietnam, which brought thousands of refugees to Fresno County.
Other factors which drove the African American exodus were rising incomes, the virtual elimination of housing discrimination, and continued impoverishment in the 1990s due to the transfer of redevelopment funds away from West Fresno and into other projects: “In March 1994, $1,196,500 in redevelopment funds was transferred from west Fresno to the downtown baseball stadium project. In August 1994, another $1,194,900 was transferred for the stadium.” (Krikorian 2000)
One area resident, Rubi Pegues-White, executive director of the African American Historical and Cultural Museum of the San Joaquin Valley, put it thus: “"I feel like west Fresno as a community was raped by redevelopment. When I drive through the community and see the redevelopment that never happened, it really hurts."
By the time the 2000 U.S. Census was tabulated, the shift from African American neighborhood dominance to Hispanic/Latino was well underway:
• West Fresno, one of the city's oldest neighborhoods and a longtime focus of its African-American community, now has more Hispanics/Latinos than AfricanAmericans. • Since 1980, the area bounded roughly by North, Marks and Nielsen avenues and the Union Pacific Railroad tracks has undergone a startling shift in its racial and ethnic makeup.
• Twenty years ago, almost two-thirds of its population was African American and less than one-third was Hispanic/Latino. In 1990, slightly more than half were Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 16 African American and about 36% Hispanic/Latino, with Asians making up most of the remainder.
• But last year's census showed that Hispanics/Latinos now outnumber African Americans by a margin of 47% to 36%. The same is true in six of the area's seven census tracts: Hispanics now outnumber African Americans, even though 20 years ago African Americans made up the largest group in all seven tracts. • Today, the only west Fresno tract where African Americans still outnumber Hispanics/Latinos is the southernmost, bounded by Fruit, Jensen, Elm avenues and the North Central Canal south of North Avenue (Clemings 2001).
The 2010 U.S. Census showed a continuing decline of the African American populations in key Fresno tracts. In the 7th, encompassing the areas to the north and west of Chandler Field, African Americans, Hispanic/Latinos and whites each made up roughly a third of the total.
Results were similar in Tract 11, equivalent to the far eastern section of the Specific Plan Area.
In tracts 9.01 and 9.02, mentioned above, the major ethnic populations were, in descending order, Hispanic/Latino (28.9 percent), white (23.6 percent), African American (22.9 percent) and Asian (18.6 percent). African Americans, though still dominant in Tract 10 (29.7 percent), had seen their proportion decline by more than half, with Hispanic/Latinos and whites coming in close to their number (26.1 and 23.9 percent, respectively); Asians made up all but six percent of the difference.
Thus, the third major ethnic shift in the SFSP area is well underway. After a long period of single-group dominance, it is now becoming noticeably diverse.
3.0 EXISTING RESOURCES
3.1 Records Search
A records search was completed of archaeological base maps, records, and reports on file at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center at CSU Bakersfield. As part of the literature review, the following files were reviewed at the SSJVIC:
• California Inventory of Historic Resources;
• California Historical Landmarks;
• California Points of Historical Interest;
• National Register of Historic Places;
• A Guide to Historic Architecture in Fresno (online site: www.HistoricFresno.org); • California Register of Historical Resources;
• The Historic Property Data File for Fresno County as maintained by the Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento (HRI)
Forty-eight cultural resources, consisting primarily of historic-era single family homes, have been previously identified and recorded within the SFSP study area (Attachment 1, Table 1). No Native American sites have been previously documented within the study area. A minimum of 28 projects have been completed within portions of the study area (Attachment 1, Table 2).
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 17
3.1.1 Cultural Resources Previously Identified within the SFSP Study Area Based on current information, there are 51 known cultural resources sites previously documented within the SFSP study area. These include 48 historic-era buildings, one landfill site, one refuse scatter concentration, and a cement structure foundation.
The 48 historic-era structures/facilities documented within the study area include 39 single-family residences (11 of which include ancillary structures such as detached garages and/or storage sheds), two multiple-family complexes, a vacant dairy barn, an industrial repair yard with three buildings, a miscellaneous industrial building, a commercial building, an educational complex, a military complex, and a park with pool and recreation facilities.
Previously recorded structures date to two main building periods, the 1910s (12 structures) and the 1940s (15 structures). Two residential dwellings date to the early 1900s, with seven dating to the 1920s and three to the 1930s. Nine structures date to the 1950s. The refuse scatter concentration noted above is estimated to date to the late 19th/early 20th century based on artifact types present. A concrete foundation, which may be the remains of a backyard kitchen typically constructed by Volga German families, is estimated to date to the 1920s based on examination of Sanborn records. The Fresno Sanitary Landfill was constructed in 1937 and closed in 1987.
One resource - the Fresno Sanitary Landfill - is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); it is also listed as a National Landmark. The Teilman Home at 919 W. Kearney Boulevard is listed on the Local Register of Historic Resources.
Figure 5. Teilman Home, 919 W. Kearney Boulevard, Fresno, California.
3.1.2 Windshield Survey and Documents Search of the SFSP Study Area A search was made of the City of Fresno Assessor’s online records for parcels located within the study area. A minimum of 3060 parcels are present within the study area. Of these, 215 parcels are vacant, 2457 are residential, 131 are commercial, 27 are agricultural, 2 include portions of the Fresno Irrigation District canal network, and 19 parcels include churches.
In general the study area is dominated by residential buildings, many of which were constructed in the 1940s (513) and 1950s (639). Building construction in the 1960s included 365 Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 18 residences, 40 in the 1970s, 180 in the 1980s, 171 in the 1990s, and 21 in the first decade of this century. Agricultural land is confined for the most part to the western portions of the study area. Commercial/light industry is located along W. Jensen and S. Elm avenues; however, the number of businesses in these two categories is small.
A windshield survey was conducted of the study area to ground truth information gathered from the Assessor’s online database. The purpose of this survey was to identify properties that may have qualities which would make them potentially eligible for listing in local, state or national registers of historic properties. A minimum of 50 buildings, predominately residential, appear potentially significant and warrant further investigation. Also included in potentially significant property is a segment of an 1890s canal.
There are a number of housing subdivisions within the study area that date to the mid1900s. From an architectural standpoint, none of them appear to meet criteria for historic district, mainly because so many of them have been altered subsequent to construction.
Figures 6 through 9 depict land use and housing development within portions of the study area.
4.0 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION
The City of Fresno sent a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on February 23, 2017. NOPs were also sent to 13 local Native American tribes/individuals. Responses were subsequently received from Ron Goode (North Fork Mono) by telephone and Robert Pennell (Table Mountain Rancheria) via written response (Attachment 3).
On June 30, 2017, the NAHC was contacted to identify any areas of importance to Native peoples within the study area that have been documented in the Commission’s Sacred Lands files. To date no response has been received.
5.0 OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
Known cultural resources within the SFSP study area at present are limited to historicera buildings, structures and archaeological sites. No Native American sites or other resources have been identified within the study area. As noted above, based on current information, there are a minimum of 41 known cultural resources sites within the SFSP area. In addition to these resources, a number of historic sites are known to exist in the planning area but have not been formally recorded. At least 50 historic-period resources were identified within the SFSP area during the present study that may qualify for federal, state, or local register listing.
A small portion of lands included within the SFSP study area have been surveyed and cultural resources documented. Utilization of the available data is integral to planning for future uses and activities and to determine the best management strategy for such resources at this programmatic phase of the planning process. All actions taken pursuant to the SFSP shall be planned and implemented in coordination with provisions and implementing guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended March 18, 2010, which states that identification and evaluation of historical resources is required for any action that may result in a Figure 6: The two housing developments are over 30 years apart, but there are some obvious differences: The 1950s development has smaller parcels, whereas the 1980s area has some larger parcels and the introduction of irregular parcels, cul-de-sacs, and non-linear roads.
This is a 1950s
housing development.
This is a 1980s
housing development.
Figure 7: This area is located in the northwest part of the Southwest Fresno Project area. This is area was to be part of the proposed Running Horse golf course in the early part of the 2000s. Kearney Boulevard runs through the middle of this area.
This is farmland owned in
the pre-WWII primarily by
first generation Japanese
families.
Figure 8: This is one of the largest 1940s housing developments in west Fresno. During the post-WWII period there was a housing shortage and this is one of the projects that provided affordable housing in the latter 1940s.
This is a 1940s
housing development.
Figure 9: This is home to light industry on the west side of Fresno between South Elm Avenue (previously State Route 41) and the realigned State Route 41 South between Jensen Avenue to the north and North Avenue to the south. Most of the Southwest Fresno Project area is dedicated largely to housing, agriculture, and light industry.
This area is home to light industry
on the west side of Fresno dating
to the latter 1900s.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 23 potential adverse effect on the significance of such resources, which includes archaeological resources as well as the built environment. Once specific projects are planned, targeted studies can be conducted to avoid or minimize impacts to significant cultural resources.
5.1 Opportunities
The following opportunities allow for better understanding, interpretation, and management of cultural resources within the SFSP area:
• Opportunities for interpretation of the historic past of Southwest Fresno Parkway; • Preservation and long-term maintenance and management of significant historic sites within the SFSP area, including adaptive re-use of historic buildings; • Collaboration with local communities in the identification, interpretation, and management of cultural properties.
5.2 Constraints
Development of the SFSP area may be constrained by the following:
• All development projects must be preceded by both archaeological survey, which may include both surface and subsurface survey, as well as identification and evaluation of the built environment.
• In the event that buried archaeological deposits are encountered during grounddisturbing projects, all work within 25 meters of the discovery shall cease until the finds can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist.
• Although no known prehistoric or Native American human remains have been identified within or in the vicinity of the Planning Area, there is a possibility that ground‐disturbing activities associated with cumulative development may uncover previously unknown buried human remains. The uncovering of human remains is considered a significant impact.
5.3 Recommendations
The following recommendations are offered to ensure that cultural resources are afforded an appropriate level of protection and preservation within the SFSP area. • Incorporate within the Specific Plan the preservation and long-term maintenance and management of significant cultural resources
• Ensure that the local communities, including Native American tribes, are included in all planning and development activities
• Conduct archaeological field inventories prior to development of specific plans for land uses that could disturb or destroy sensitive and significant cultural resources, including previously undocumented resources
• Focus the placement of new development in areas that will not impinge on the historic nature of older neighborhoods where potentially significant buildings and structures may be located.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 24
REFERENCES CITED
Basgall, M. E. and D. L. True
1985 Archaeological investigations in Crowder Canyon, 1973-1984: Excavations at Sites SBR-421B, SBR-421C, SBR-421D, and SBR-713. Report on file, Caltrans, Sacramento, California.
Baumhoff, M. A.
1963 Ecological Determinants of Aboriginal California Populations. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 49(2). Berkeley, California.
Bort, James Jr.
1963 “Making Integration Work: Mass Shift of Negroes is Unlikely.” The Fresno Bee, 21 November 1963.
Brady, J. L. and Karana Hattersley-Drayton
2003 Historic Property Survey for the City of Fresno Veterans, South Marks and West California EA H-2003-23. Prepared for the City of Fresno by J & R Environmental Services & Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Project Manager, City of Fresno Planning Department.
Bulbulian, Berge
2001 The Fresno Armenians – History of a Diaspora Community. Word Dancer Press, Sanger, California.
Clemings, Russell
2001 “Ethnic Shift.” The Fresno Bee, 17 June 2001.
Clough, Charles W. and William B. Secrest Jr.
1984 Fresno County – The Pioneer Years: From the Beginning to 1900. Panorama West Books, Fresno, California.
Datel, Robin Elisabeth.
1999 “Picturing the Central Valley through Maps.” In Picturing California’s Other Landscape: the Great Central Valley. Ed. Heath Schenker, 93-116.Heyday Books, Berkeley, California.
Eaton, Edwin M.
1965 Vintage Fresno – Pictorial Recollections of a Western City. The Huntington Press, Fresno, Calfiornia.
Gayton, A. H.
1948 Yokuts and Western Mono Ethnography I: Tulare Lake, Southern Valley, and Central Foothill Yokuts. University of California Anthropological Records 10(1). Berkeley, California.
Guard, W. C.
1913 Atlas of Fresno County, California. W.C. Guard, Fresno, California.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 25 Hamilton, M. Colleen, Randy Baloain, Kholood Abdo Hintzman, and Keith Warren 2014 Results of Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring and Data Recovery at CAFRE-3544H, Fresno Veterans Home, Fresno, California. Prepared for ICF Jones & Stokes, Los Angeles, California by Applied EarthWorks, Inc., Fresno, California.
Harvey, William
1907 Atlas of Fresno County. Fresno, California.
Kearney, M. Theo
1985 Map of Portion of Fresno County, California Showing Some of Its Principal Irrigating Canals, Colonies, Vineyards and Orchards. San Francisco, California.
Krikorian, Michael
1964 “A West Side Story.” The Fresno Bee, 19 March 2000.
Kroeber, A. L.
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California (1976 Dover Edition). Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 76, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.
Kuhn, Gene
1964 “Poverty Amid Plenty: Hunger, Despair Blight Nation’s Farm Heartland.” The Fresno Bee, 26 July 1964.
Latta, Frank F.
1999 Handbook of Yokuts Indians. 50th Anniversary Commemorative Edition. Brewer’s Historical Press, Exeter, CA, and Coyote Press, Salinas, California.
McGuire, Kelly R.
1995 Test Excavations at CA-FRE-61, Fresno County, California. Occasional Papers in Anthropology 5. Museum of Anthropology, California State University Bakersfield, California.
Meighan, Clement W., and B. D. Dillon
1984 Redbank and Fancher Creeks Intensive Cultural Resources Survey. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District. Report on file, Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, CSU Bakersfield. File number FR-24/53.
Panter, John
1994 “Central California Colony: ‘Marvel of the Desert.” Fresno Past And Present 36:2 (Summer 1994) 1-11.
Philips, G.H.
1993 Indians and Intruders in Central California, 176901849. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.
Progressive Map Service
1920 Progressive Atlas of Fresno County. Fresno, California.
Progressive Map Service
1936 Progressive Atlas of Fresno County. Fresno, California.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 26 Punnet Brothers
n.d. Map Showing Colony System of Settlement Surrounding Fresno, Fresno County, California. Drawn by Punnett Brothers, San Francisco, California.
R.L. Polk & Company
1939 Polk’s Fresno (Fresno County) City Directory. San Francisco: R.L. Polk & Company. 1951 Polk’s Fresno (Fresno County) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Company, San Francisco, California.
Rawls, James J.
1984 Indians of California, The Changing Image. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.
Spier, Robert F. G.
1978 Foothill Yokuts. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 471-484. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Steinberg, Jim
1991 “Everyone Didn’t Count in West Fresno Census.” The Fresno Bee, 26 March 1991.
Thickens, Virginia Emily
1942 Pioneer Colonies of Fresno County. M.A. Thesis, University of California.
Thompson, Thomas H.
1891 Official Historical Atlas Map of Fresno County. Thos. H. Thompson, Tulare, California.
Walker, Ben Randall
1941 The Fresno County Blue Book. Arthur H. Cawston, Fresno, California.
Winchell, Lilbourne Alsip
1933 History of Fresno County and the San Joaquin Valley. Arthur H. Cawston, Fresno, California.
Wallace, William J.
1954 The Little Sycamore Site and the Early Milling Stone Cultures of Southern California.
American Antiquity 20(2):112-123.
1978a Post-Pleistocene Archeology, 9000 to 2000 B.C. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 25-36. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
1978b Southern Valley Yokuts. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 448-461. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Walker, Ben Randall
1941 The Fresno County Blue Book. Arthur H. Cawston, Fresno, California.
Winchell, Lilbourne Alsip
1933 History of Fresno County and the San Joaquin Valley. Arthur H. Cawston, Fresno, California.
Existing Conditions and Resources Assessment: Cultural Resources Page 27
WEB SITES
National Archives and Records Administration
1900 Twelfth Census of the United States. www.ancestry.com accessed July 18, 2015 U.S. Census Bureau
2010 “2010 Census Interactive Population Map.” Retrieved on July 18, 2017 from https://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/.
QUALIFICATIONS OF PREPARERS
C. Kristina Roper meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for archaeology. Ms. Roper has a B.A. in Anthropology from the University of California, Berkeley, and a M.A. in Cultural Resources Management from Sonoma State University. She has over 35 years of archaeological survey and excavation experience, including both prehistoric and historic sites, in California, Nevada, Oregon, and Idaho, and has produced over 300 professional reports. For the past 20 years Ms. Roper has served as a Lecturer in Anthropology at California State University, Fresno. Ms. Roper is a Registered Professional Archaeologist in good standing and since 2015 has served as a Commissioner with the City of Fresno Historic Preservation Commission. As sole proprietor of a cultural resources management firm established in 1995, her responsibilities include all aspects of project management, from marketing and development, to project completion, and include NEPA, CEQA, and NHPA (Section 106) compliance.
Jon L. Brady meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for archaeology and architectural history. Mr. Brady holds a B.A. in both Political Science and Anthropology and an M.A. in History (with an emphasis on Historical Archaeology) from California State University, Fresno.
Mr. Brady has worked as a consulting archaeologist and historian over the last thirty years working with both Section 106 and CEQA compliance documents. He has also taught at the community college level in California over the last sixteen years as an adjunct instructor.
Courses taught include Ancient Civilizations, Modern European History, U.S. History, Political Science, Cultural Anthropology, and Field Methods in Archaeology.
William B. Secrest, Jr. has been a historical researcher, specializing in Fresno County and the San Joaquin Valley, for the past thirty years. He holds a B.A. in Journalism from California State University, Fresno, and an M.S. in library science from Florida State University. In addition, he is a member of the Academy of Certified Archivists. Since 2006, he has been employed as the Local History Librarian for the Fresno County Public Library system. Among his publications are Fresno County: The Pioneer Years (1984) and the revised edition of Wallace Smith's San Joaquin Valley history, Garden of the Sun (2004). Mr. Secrest peered reviewed and conducted archival research for the Historical Section for this report.
Attachment 1
Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center
Records Search No. 15-225
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
Table 1. Resource List
SSJVIC Record Search 15-225 Primary No.
Trinomial
P-10-004648 Resource Name - NORTH-1S Building Historic HP02 (Single family property)
2000 (L. Palmer, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-004649 Resource Name - NORTH-3S Building Historic HP02 (Single family property)
2000 (L. Palmer, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-004650 Resource Name - NORTH-4N Building Historic HP04 (Ancillary building)
2000 (L. Palmer, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-004651 Resource Name - NORTH-4S Building Historic HP02 (Single family property)
2000 (L. Palmer, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-004652 Resource Name - NORTH-5N Building Historic HP03 (Multiple family property)
2000 (L. Palmer, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005021 Resource Name - Nishikawa
Home
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005022 Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005023 Resource Name - Mortensen
Residence
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005024 Resource Name - Bill's Bait and
Tackle
Building Historic HP06 (1-3 story
commercial building)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005025 Resource Name - Garoian
Residence
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005026 Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005027 Resource Name - 570 So.
Hughes Avenue
Building Historic HP02 (Single family FR-00250
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005032 Resource Name - Smith
Residence
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Cal Trans)
P-10-005034 Resource Name - National Linen
Service
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1994 (Jim Fisher, Caltrans)
P-10-005229 Resource Name - The Valdes
Residence
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1996 (Dolores Mellon, City of
Fresno)
P-10-005410 Resource Name - 612 N. Mayor Building Historic HP02 (Single family FR-02054 property)
2004 (W. Nettles, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005411 Resource Name - 626 N. Mayor Building Historic HP02 (Single family FR-02054 property)
2004 (W. Nettles, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005412 Resource Name - 630 N Mayor Building Historic HP02 (Single family FR-02054 property)
2004 (W. Nettles, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)