Agenda, first session — Garden Grove City Council, May 24, 2022 (part 1 of 4)

AGENDA
Garden Grove City
Council
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
6:30 PM
Community Meeting
Center 11300 Stanford
Avenue Garden Grove
California 92840
Steve Jones
Mayor
Diedre Thu-Ha Nguyen
Mayor Pro Tem - District 3
George S. Brietigam
Council Member - District 1
John R. O'Neill
Council Member - District 2
Patrick Phat Bui
Council Member - District 4
Stephanie Klopfenstein
Council Member - District 5
Kim B. Nguyen
Council Member - District 6
COVID-19 Information : Members of the public can address the City Council during the public comment portion of the meeting in person or via e-mail. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, masks or face coverings are required to be worn if you are not vaccinated. If you feel ill or are showing symptoms of COVID-19, please consider submitting comments by e-mail. Instructions are available on the City's website at https://ggcity.org/city-council/meetings-participation

Meeting Assistance
: Any person requiring auxiliary aids and services, due to a disability, to address the City Council, should contact the City Clerk's Office 72 hours prior to the meeting to arrange for accommodations. Phone: (714) 741-5040.

Agenda Item Descriptions
: Are intended to give a brief, general description of the item. The City Council may take legislative action deemed appropriate with respect to the item and is not limited to the recommended action indicated in staff reports or the agenda.

Documents/Writings
: Any revised or additional documents/writings related to an item on the agenda distributed to all or a majority of the Council Members within 72 hours of a meeting, are made available for public inspection at the same time (1) in the City Clerk's Office at 11222 Acacia Parkway, Garden Grove, CA 92840, during normal business hours; (2) on the City's website as an attachment to the City Council meeting agenda; and (3) at the Council Chamber at the time of the meeting.

Public Comments
: Members of the public who attend the meeting in-person and would like to address the City Council are requested to complete a pink speaker card indicating their name and address, and identifying the subject matter they wish to address. This card should be given to the City Clerk before the meeting begins. General comments are made during "Oral Communications" and should be limited to matters under consideration and/or what the City Council has jurisdiction over.

Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding a Public Hearing matter will be called to the podium at the time the matter is being considered.

Manner of Addressing the City Council
: After being called by the Mayor, you may approach the podium, it is requested that you state your name for the record, and proceed to address the City Council. All remarks and questions should be addressed to the City Council as a whole and not to individual Council Members or staff members. Any person making impertinent, slanderous, or profane

Page 1 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE
remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the City Council shall be called to order by the Mayor.If such conduct continues, the Mayor may order the person barred from addressing the City Council any further during that meeting.

Time Limitation: When any group of persons wishes to address the City Council on the same subject matter, the Mayor may request a spokesperson be chosen to represent the group, so as to avoid unnecessary repetition.At the City Council's discretion, a limit on the total amount of time for public comments during Oral Communications and/or a further limit on the time allotted to each speaker during Oral Communications may be set.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING.

AGENDA

ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBER BRIETIGAM, COUNCIL MEMBER

O'NEILL, COUNCIL MEMBER BUI, COUNCIL MEMBER KLOPFENSTEIN, COUNCIL MEMBER K. NGUYEN, MAYOR PRO TEM D. NGUYEN , MAYOR JONES

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA

1. PRESENTATIONS

1.a. Community Spotlight - Garden Grove Strong Heroes for their selfless acts of service during the coronavirus pandemic.

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (to be held simultaneously with other legislative bodies)
RECESS

CONDUCT OTHER LEGISLATIVE BODIES' BUSINESS

RECONVENE

3. CONSENT ITEMS
(Consent Items will be acted on simultaneously with one motion unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Council Member .)

3.a. Adoption of a Proclamation declaring June as LGBTQ Pride Month. (Action Item)

3.b. Approval of a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Westminster for street rehabilitation on Hazard Avenue from Bushard Street to Ward Street in Garden Grove. ( Action Item)

3.c. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Downtown Assessment District Budget; adoption of a Resolution initiating proceedings for the levying of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23; adoption of a Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report; and adoption of

Page 2 of 376 ends

a Resolution of Intention fixing a time and date for a public hearing. (Action Item)

3.d. Adoption of Resolutions for Initiating proceedings for the Levying of Fiscal Year 2022-23 Assessment for: City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District, Street Lighting District No. 99-1, the Park Maintenance District, the Engineer's Report, and the intention for fixing a time and date to conduct a public hearing. (Action Item)

3.e. Authorization to issue a purchase order to Motorola Solutions for police motorcycle radios. (Cost: $58,000) ( Action item)

3.f. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to an Agreement with Civiltec Engineering, Inc. for engineering and condition assessment of Well Nos. 16, 19, and 25 (Cost: $70,330) ( Action Item)

3.g. Receive and file warrants. ( Action Item)

3.h. Approval to waive full reading of ordinances listed. ( Action Item)

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Motion to approve will include adoption of each Resolution unless otherwise stated.)

4.a. Introduction and first reading of an ordinance adopting the Garden Grove Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy Entitled: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove adopting the Garden Grove Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy pursuant to Government Code 7071 . (Action Item)

5. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MATTERS

5.a. Consideration of an appointment to fill a vacancy on the Housing Authority Commission. ( Action Item)

6. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

6.a. Award of contracts to DUDEK and JIG Consultants for on-call construction management and inspection services for various water and sewer projects. (Cost: $500,000 each contract) (Joint Action Item with the Sanitary District )

6.b. Award a contract to All American Asphalt, for Various Street Rehabilitation 2022 Projects. (Cost: $4,798,930) (Action Item)

7. ORDINANCES PRESENTED FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION

7.a. Second reading of Ordinance No. 2933
Entitled: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove approving Amendment No. A-034-2022, a text amendment to Chapter 9.18 (Mixed Use Regulations and Development
Standards) of Title 9 of the City of Garden Grove Municipal Code to establish "Automobile Fleet Storage" as a conditionally permitted use in the NMU (Neighborhood Mixed Use) zone, and

Page 3 of 376 ends

to establish related special operating conditions and development standards. (Action Item)

7.b. Second reading of Ordinance No. 2934
Entitled: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove, California, adding Chapters 8.92 and 8.94 to Title 8 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code establishing regulations prohibiting the unlawful possession of catalytic converters in the city, and repairs and sales of bicycles and bicycle parts on public property. (Action Item)

8. MATTERS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND CITY

MANAGER

9. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular City Council Meeting is Tuesday, June 14, 2022, at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, 92840.

Page 4 of 376 ends

Agenda Item - 3.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Teresa Pomeroy
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: City Clerk
Subject: Adoption of a Proclamation
declaring June as LGBTQ
Pride Month. ( Action Item)
Date: 5/24/2022
Attached is a proclamation declaring June as LGBTQ Pride Month recommended for adoption.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Proclamation 5/19/2022 Proclamation 5-24-
22_LGBTQI_Proclamation.June_2022.pdf

Page 5 of 376 ends

PROCLAMATION

June 2022 as LBGTQ Pride Month

WHEREAS, Our nation was founded on the principle of equal rights for all people, but the fulfillment of this promise has been long in coming for many Americans.

Some of the most inspiring moments in our history have arisen from the various civil rights movements that have brought one group after another from the margins to the mainstream of American society; WHEREAS, In the movement toward equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, and intersex (LBGTQ) people, a historic turning point occurred on June 28, 1969, in New York City, with the onset of the Stonewall Riots. During these riots, LBGTQ citizens rose up and resisted police harassment that arose out of discriminatory criminal laws that have since been declared unconstitutional. In the four decades since, civil rights for LBGTQ people have grown substantially, and LBGTQ pride celebrations have taken place around the country every June to commemorate the beginning of the Stonewall Riots; and
WHEREAS, California has been a leader in advancing the civil rights of its LBGTQ citizens. And while further progress is needed, it is important to recognize and celebrate the substantial gains that have been achieved.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT DECLARED that the City of Garden Grove does hereby proclaim June 2022 as LBGTQ Pride Month.

May 24, 2022

Page 6 of 376 ends

Agenda Item - 3.b.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Approval of a Cooperative
Agreement with the City of
Westminster for street
rehabilitation on Hazard
Avenue from Bushard Street
to Ward Street in Garden
Grove. (Action Item)
Date: 5/24/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to approve the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Garden Grove and the City of Westminster for the rehabilitation of Hazard Avenue from Bushard Street to Ward Street.

BACKGROUND
The City of Garden Grove prepared a street rehabilitation project for Hazard Avenue, from Bushard Street to Ward Street, and has offered to improve the City of Westminster's portion. Approximately one-half of the work lies within the City of Westminster.

This proposed agreement provides delineation of responsibilities and construction costs between the City of Garden Grove and the City of Westminster for subject project. The City of Garden Grove is serving as lead agency.

DISCUSSION
The City of Westminster has reviewed the plans, specifications, and construction estimate of the project and verified the work within the City of Westminster. The project cost for the City of Westminster's portion of the project is estimated at $521,285.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There will be no financial impact to the General Fund. This improvement is included in the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Budget and is funded by Measure "M2" Fairshare, Gas Tax and the City of Westminster funds.

Page 7 of 376 ends

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Westminster for the rehabilitation of Hazard Avenue from Bushard Street to Ward Street; and

Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and make minor modifications as appropriate thereto on behalf of the City.

By: Nick Hsieh, P.E. Associate Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
AGREEMENT 5/10/2022 Agreement
Westminster_-
_GG_Coop_Agreement_-
_Hazard_Ave_(1).doc
EXHIBIT A 5/10/2022 Exhibit Exhibit_A_-
_Location_Map.pdf

Page 8 of 376 ends

•
•

956753.1 Page 1 of 8

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated this _____ day of _________________, 2022, is made and entered into by and between the City of Westminster, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “WESTMINSTER” and the City of Garden Grove, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “ GARDEN GROVE”.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, GARDEN GROVE is contemplating the rehabilitation of the pavement surface of that portion of Hazard Avenue from Bushard Street to Ward Street, located in the City of Westminster, (hereinafter the “GG PORTION”); and,

WHEREAS, there is a portion of Hazard Avenue located within the boundaries of WESTMINSTER (hereinafter “WESTMINSTER PORTION”); and,

WHEREAS, WESTMINSTER desires to have GARDEN GROVE rehabilitate the WESTMINSTER PORTION of Hazard Avenue in conjunction with the GG PORTION, collectively the “PROJECT”, and GARDEN GROVE is willing to do so. The exact location of the WESTMINSTER PORTION is described in detail in the document attached hereto as Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference. The estimated cost of the WESTMINSTER PORTION , including a ten percent (10%) contingency , is Three Hundred and Ninety-Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy-Three Dollars ($ 394,873) (the "Estimated Cost").

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following promises, covenants, and conditions, the parties hereto do agree as follows:

1. DUTIES OF WESTMINSTER

a. Upon commencement of the PROJECT, GARDEN GROVE shall include the WESTMINSTER PORTION as a part of GARDEN GROVE’s public works project, prepare the request for bids, hire the lowest responsible bidder (the “Successful Contractor”), and oversee and administer the PROJECT in the WESTMINSTER PORTION in the same manner and to the same extent as the GARDEN GROVE PORTION, all in accordance with all applicable laws governing construction of public works by GARDEN GROVE, including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act and laws governing public bidding and the payment of prevailing wages. If GARDEN GROVE, in its sole discretion, determines not to proceed with the PROJECT at any time prior to commencement of actual work, this Agreement shall terminate with

Page 9 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 2 of 8
no further action required by either party. In the event the projected actual cost of the WESTMINSTER PORTION, as reflected in the Successful Contractor's bid, exceeds the Estimated Cost by twenty percent (20%), GARDEN GROVE shall not award a contract to the Successful Bidder for the WESTMINSTER PORTION without prior written approval of
WESTMINSTER.

b. At least thirty (30) calendar days prior to release of the Notice Inviting Bids for the PROJECT, GARDEN GROVE ’s City Engineer shall provide WESTMINSTER’s City Engineer a copy of the PROJECT’s plans and specifications for hi s approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If WESTMINSTER’s City Engineer objects to the plans and specifications, and if his objections cannot be satisfied through discussions with GARDEN GROVE’s City Engineer, the WESTMINSTER PORTION shall not be included in the PROJECT and GARDEN GROVE shall proceed with the GARDEN GROVE PORTION only.

c. GARDEN GROVE agrees that it shall not permit nor cause any hazardous materials to be brought upon, kept, used, stored, generated or disposed of in, or, or about the WESTMINSTER PORTION. “Hazardous Materials” shall mean any material that, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, or any combination thereof, is deemed by a federal, state, or local governmental authority to pose a present or potential hazard to human health or safety or to the environment.

d. GARDEN GROVE shall ensure that its contract with the Successful Contractor requires the Successful Contractor provide insurance acceptable to WESTMINSTER as shown in Exhibit “B,” to name WESTMINSTER as an additional insured, and to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless WESTMINSTER in the same manner and to the same extent as GARDEN GROVE. GARDEN GROVE shall not permit construction of any portion of the PROJECT to commence until evidence of the required insurance and additional insured endorsements have been provided to and approved by WESTMINSTER.

2. WESTMINSTER’S DUTIES

a. WESTMINSTER shall pay GARDEN GROVE for the actual cost of the work on the WESTMINSTER PORTION based upon unit prices bid of the Successful Contractor and quantities actually used on the WESTMINSTER PORTION. WESTMINSTER shall pay GARDEN GROVE the total amount due for the WESTMINSTER PORTION upon official final approval of the work by WESTMINSTER provided that such final approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

Page 10 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 3 of 8

b. WESTMINSTER agrees that any permits required by the Successful Contractor for the work to be performed on the WESTMINSTER PORTION shall be issued to the Successful Contractor at no cost to GARDEN GROVE or the Successful Contractor.

c. WESTMINSTER shall provide its own inspection services for the WESTMINSTER PORTION of the work.

d. WESTMINSTER agrees to fully cooperate with GARDEN GROVE and the Successful Contractor in the prosecution of the work, traffic control, and any other matters required for completion of the PROJECT in the WESTMINSTER PORTION.

e. WESTMINSTER acknowledges that GARDEN GROVE is not the contractor for the PROJECT and that GARDEN GROVE does not warrant any work performed by the Successful Contractor. Notwithstanding the above, GARDEN GROVE shall require the Successful Contractor to provide WESTMINSTER with any and all warranties, insurance coverage, and indemnities and any other rights the Successful Contractor agrees to provide to GARDEN GROVE under the construction contract and as provided by law.

f. In addition to the above, WESTMINSTER also agrees to pay GARDEN GROVE for all costs associated with any change orders pertaining to the WESTMINSTER PORTION, provided the chang e orders have been previously approved in writing by WESTMINSTER’s City Engineer.

3. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This writing constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all oral or written representat ions or written agreements that may have been entered into between the parties. No modification s or revisions shall be of any force or effect, unless the same is in writing and executed by the parties hereto.

4. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any of the attached Exhibit, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Agr eement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.

Page 11 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 4 of 8

5. ASSIGNMENT

Neither WESTMINSTER nor GARDEN GROVE may assign or transfer its rights or obligations under this Agreement, or any part thereof, without the written consent of the other party.

6. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof.

7. GOVERNING LAW

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid under any applicable statute or rule of law, then such portion only shall be deemed invalid. Venue shall exclusively be in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange, California.

8. NO WAIVER

No waiver or failure to exercise any right, option, or privilege under the terms of this Agreement on any occasion shall be construed to be a waiver of any other right, option, or privilege on any other occasion.

9. NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS

The parties do not intend to create rights in, or to grant remedies to, any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established herein.

Page 12 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 5 of 8

10. NOTICES

Notices and communication concerning this Agreement shall be sent to the following addresses:

GARDEN GROVE WESTMINSTER

City of Garden Grove City of Westminster
Attention: Dan Candelaria, P.E., T.E. Attention: Jake Ngo, P.E.

City Engineer Public Works Director/City Engineer
11222 Acacia Parkway 8200 Westminster Blvd.

Garden Grove, CA 92842 Westminster, CA 92683

Either party may, by notice to the other party, change the address specified above.

Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications concerning this Agreement may be provided by personal delivery, facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth above. Such communication shall be deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) five (5) calendar days after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent through regular United States mail.

11. EFFECTIVE DATE

The effective date of this Agreement shall be the latest date of execution hereinafter set forth opposite the names of the signatures hereto.

12. INDEMNITY

GARDEN GROVE and WESTMINSTER each hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the other party, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, representatives, volunteers, and agents from and against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property), demands, workers’ compensation benefits, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of any kind or nature, arising from the activities of the indemnitor or its officers, agents, or employees on the PROJECT, or any breach of contract, negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of the indemnitor, or its officers, agents, or employees arising out of the performance of, or failure to perform, any provisions of this Agreement. Neither party assumes liability for the acts or omissi ons of persons other than each p arty’s respective officers, agents, or employees. In the event judgment is entered agains t both p arties because of joint or concurrent negligence of both p arties, or their officers, agents, or employees, an apportionment of liability to pay such judgment shall be made by a court of competent jurisdiction. The respective obligations of the parties pursuant to this Section

Page 13 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 6 of 8
shall survive expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

13. COOPERATION

In the event any claim or action is brought against GARDEN GROVE relating to the performance rendered under this Agreement, WESTMINSTER shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation which GARDEN GROVE might require.

14. COSTS

Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein.

15. HEADINGS

Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

16. CONSTRUCTION.

The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question o f intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

17. SEVERABILITY

If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any p arty, is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good faith negotiations.

18. COUNTERPARTS

This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

Page 14 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 7 of 8

19. CORPORATE AUTHORITY

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.

[Signatures on the following page.]

Page 15 of 376 ends

956753.1 Page 8 of 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the dates hereinafter respectively set forth.

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, ATTEST:
a municipal corporation

By: ___________________________ _____________________________ Scott C. Stiles, City Manager Teresa Pomeroy, Garden Grove City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM: DATE OF EXECUTION:

______________________________ _____________________________ Omar Sandoval, Garden Grove City Attorney

CITY OF WESTMINSTER, ATTEST:
a municipal corporation

By: ___________________________ _____________________________ Christine Cordon, Interim City Manager Lucie Colombo, Westminster Interim City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM: DATE OF EXECUTION:

__________________________________ _____________________________ Christian Bettenhausen, Westminster City Attorney

Page 16 of 376 ends

Page 17 of 376 ends

Agenda Item - 3.c.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Approval of the Fiscal Year
2022-23 Downtown
Assessment District Budget;
adoption of a Resolution
initiating proceedings for the
levying of assessments for
Fiscal Year 2022-23;
adoption of a Resolution
approving the Engineer’s
Report; and adoption of a
Resolution of Intention fixing
a time and date for a public
hearing. (Action Item)
Date: 5/24/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to (1) approve the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget for the Downtown Assessment District No. 1 (District); (2) Adopt a resolution initiating proceedings for the levying of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23; (3) Adopt a resolution approving the Engineer’s Report; and (4) Adopt a Resolution of Intention fixing a time and date for the public hearing.

BACKGROUND
In 1977, the City Council formed the District per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act). Through an annual assessment, the District funds the construction and maintenance of special public improvements along Main Street such as planters, sidewalks, and streetlights. The Act requires that the City Council initiate the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments.

To comply with these requirements, the following actions need to take place:

Approval of FY 2022-23 assessment district budget (Attachment 1); Adoption of a resolution initiating procedures for levying assessment (Attachment 2);
Adoption of a resolution approving the Engineer’s Report (Attachments 3 & 4); and

Page 18 of 376 ends

• •
•
Adoption of a resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments and to fix a date and time for a public hearing (Attachment 5).

DISCUSSION
On March 10, 2022, the Downtown Commission approved the FY 2022-23 budget and is hereby submitting it to City Council for final review. Total expenses for FY 2022-23 are $46,000. The proposed assessment reflects no increase from the previous year and remains at $19.92 per linear-foot, which is equivalent to a $498 levy for the typical 25-foot storefront on Main Street.

The following actions recommended are for City Council to adopt the attached resolutions, thereby initiating proceedings for the annual assessment, ordering the preparation of and approving an Engineer’s Report, and finally setting a public hearing for June 14, 2022, at 6:30 p.m.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The beginning fund balance for the District is estimated at $91,442, with an estimated FY 2022-23 assessment revenue of $27,200 and total FY 2022-23 expenses of $46,000.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve the proposed Budget for the Downtown Assessment District No. 1 for 2022-23;
Adopt the attached Resolution initiating proceedings for the Downtown Assessment District No. 1;
Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report for the Downtown Assessment District No. 1; and
Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments for the Downtown Assessment District No. 1, and set a public hearing for June 14, 2022, at 6:30 p.m.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
FY22-23
Downtown
Assessment
Budget
5/12/2022 Backup Material 1._RPT_-_Downtown_FY22-23_05-09-22_Budget.pdf Resolution
Initiating
Proceedings
5/12/2022 Resolution 2._Downtown_Assessment_Initiating_Proceedings_Reso.doc Resolution
Approving
Engineer's Report
5/12/2022 Resolution 3._Downtown_Assessment_Approving_Report.doc

Page 19 of 376 ends

•
•
•
•
•
Downtown
Assessment
Engineer's Report
5/12/2022 Backup Material 4._RPT_-_Downtown_FY22-23_05-09-22.pdf Resolution
Setting Public
Hearing
5/12/2022 Resolution 5._Downtown_setting_PH_6-14-22.doc

Page 20 of 376 ends

ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͛ƐZĞƉŽƌƚ
ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ
ŝƚǇŽĨ'ĂƌĚĞŶ'ƌŽǀĞ
&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌϮϬϮϮͲϮϯ

ϯ
WZd///ʹK^d
^d/Dd

dŚĞŝƚǇΖƐďƵĚŐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐŝŶŐŽĨůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĚĞƚĂŝůƐƚŚĞĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚĐŽƐƚƐĨŽƌ &ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌϮϬϮϮͲϮϯĂƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ ƚŚŝƐZĞƉŽƌƚ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĨĞĞƐ͕ ůĞŐĂů ĨĞĞƐ͕ ƉƌŝŶƚŝŶŐ͕ŵĂŝůŝŶŐ͕ ƉŽƐƚĂŐĞ͕ ƉƵďůŝƐŚŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂůůŽƚŚĞƌ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚĐŽƐƚƐ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ƉƌŽĐĞĞĚŝŶŐƐ͘

dŚĞϭϵϳϮĐƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƐƉĞĐŝĂůĨƵŶĚďĞƐĞƚͲƵƉĨŽƌƚŚĞƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐĂŶĚĞǆƉĞŶĚŝƚƵƌĞƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘dŚĞ ϭϵϳϮĐƚĂůƐŽŚĂƐƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŝŶŐĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƌĞƐĞƌǀ ĞƚŽĨƵŶĚĐĂƉŝƚĂůŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ͘ &ƵŶĚƐ ƌĂŝƐĞĚ ďǇ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ƵƐĞĚ ŽŶůǇ ĨŽ ƌ ƚ Ś Ğ Ɖ Ƶ ƌ Ɖ Ž Ɛ Ğ Ă Ɛ Ɛ ƚ Ă ƚ Ğ Ě Ś Ğ ƌ Ğ ŝ Ŷ ͘ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚďǇƚŚĞŝƚǇŵĂǇďĞŵĂĚĞƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂƐƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůĚĞĞŵƐ ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘ŶǇďĂůĂŶĐĞŽƌĚĞĨŝĐŝƚƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐŽŶ:ƵůǇϭŵƵƐƚďĞĐĂƌƌŝĞĚŽǀĞƌƚŽƚŚĞŶĞǆƚĨŝƐĐĂůǇĞĂƌ͘ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ
ϮϬϮϭͲϮϮ
WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ
ϮϬϮϮͲϮϯΎ
^ƚĂƌƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ;&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞĂƐŽĨ:ƵůǇϭͿ Ψϵϱ͕ϲϳϰ Ψϵϭ͕ϰϰϮ

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚZĞǀĞŶƵĞƐ
dŽƚĂů
ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƐ͗ ΨϮϲ͕ϳϬϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϳϬϬ
/ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ ΨϱϬϬ ΨϱϬϬ
^ƵďƚŽƚĂůZĞǀĞŶƵĞƐ͗ ΨϮϳ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϮϬϬ

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚ
ǆƉĞŶĚŝƚƵƌĞƐ
dƌĂƐŚWŝĐŬhƉ ΨϬ ΨϬ
'ĞŶĞƌĂůDĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ Ψϭϲ͕ϴϬϬ Ψϭϴ͕ϱϬϬ
^ƚƌĞĞƚ>ŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ ΨϮ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϬϬϬ
^ƚƌĞĞƚ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ
DĂŝŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ĞĂƐŽŶĂůĂŶŶĞƌƐ Ψϯ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϬϬϬ
^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞůĞĂŶŝŶŐ Ψϯ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϲ͕ϰϬϬ
WƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ Ψϯ͕ϱϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϱϬϬ
ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ ΨϮ͕ϰϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϲϬϬ
/ŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞ ΨϳϯϮ ΨϬ
^ƵďƚŽƚĂů
ǆƉĞŶĚŝƚƵƌĞƐ͗ Ψϰϭ͕ϰϯϮ Ψϰϲ͕ϬϬϬ

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚzĞĂƌ
ŶĚ&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ Ψϴϭ͕ϰϰϮ ΨϳϮ͕ϲϰϮ
&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞĞƚĂŝů
KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐZĞƐĞƌǀĞ;ϱϬйŽĨKΘDͿ ΨϮϯ͕ϬϬϬ
ĂƉŝƚĂůZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚZĞƐĞƌǀĞ Ψϰϵ͕ϲϰϮ
ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĞƚĂŝů
dŽƚĂů&ƌŽŶƚ&ĞĞƚ;&&ͿŝŶƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͗ ϭ͕ϯϰϬ͘ϰϱ ϭ͕ϯϰϬ͘ϰϱ ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚZĂƚĞ;Ψͬ&&Ϳ͗ Ψϭϵ͘ϵϮ Ψϭϵ͘ϵϮ
Ύ&ƵŶĚďĂůĂŶĐĞĂĚũƵƐƚĞĚĂĨƚĞƌĂŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƌĞǀŝĞǁ

Page 21 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE) INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2022-23 FISCAL YEAR

FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND

ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 OF CHAPTER 1 OF THE ACT

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove formed the Downtown Assessment District by Resolution No. 5348-77 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2 (commencing with Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code; and

WHEREAS, the Act requires that proceedings for the levy of annual assessments after the formation of an Assessment District shall be initiated by Resolution describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements, and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Garden Grove:

SECTION 1. The improvements, including maintenance thereof, have not changed substantially and are described as follows:

The maintenance of the public improvements within the boundaries of the Downtown Assessment District associated with street cleaning, landscape maintenance, and repair and replacement of the public improvements as required from time to time.

SECTION 2. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Sections 22565 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.

SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Garden Grove authorizes staff to initiate proceedings necessary to establish the levy of an annual assessment for the Downtown Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for the Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Page 22 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT REGARDING THE LEVY OF AN ANNUAL

ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RESOLVES,
DETERMINES, AND ORDERS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Garden Grove, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code, did by previous Resolution order the City Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act in connection with the proposed levy of an annual assessment for the City of Garden Grove Downtown Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2021-22.

SECTION 2. The City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council the City Engineer’s report for the City of Garden Grove Downtown Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

SECTION 3. The City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the City Engineer’s report and the report is hereby approved as filed.

Page 23 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
ENGINEER’S REPORT

DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

May 9, 2022

REPARED BY

22 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
www.weareharris.com

Page 24 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE
I
B Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Engineer’s Certification .................................................................................................. i Part I - Overview ........................................................................................................... 1 Part II - Plans and Specifications ................................................................................... 2 Part III – Cost Estimate .................................................................................................. 3 Part IV – Method of Apportionment............................................................................. 4 Appendix A – Assessment Diagram .............................................................................. 6 Appendix B- Assessment Roll ........................................................................................ 8

Page 25 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

i
ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION
AGENCY: THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

PROJECT: DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the annual levy of assessments within the Downtown Assessment District of the City of Garden Grove to provide services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Services will be provided through June 30, 2023.

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), and in accordance with the City of Garden Grove’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for:

DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Overview: Provides the background and reason for the District.

PART II
Plans and Specifications: Plans and specifications for the improvements showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements.

PART III
C
ost Estimate: The estimated cost to be funded by the District for the operation, servicing and maintenance of the improvements for fiscal year 2022-23, including incidental costs and expenses in

Page 26 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

ii
connection therewith.

PART IV
M
ethod of Apportionment: The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the maintenance and/or servicing of the existing and ultimate improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.

Appendices
A
ppendix A – Assessment Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided and in conformance with the assessment methodology adopted by the City Council for the levying of assessments.

DATED: May 9, 2022

___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Orange
State of California

Page 27 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates
■ Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

1 PART I – OVERVIEW
This Report has been prepared and is submitted for consideration by the City Council of the City of Garden Grove under the authority of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 as set forth in Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

Background
In 1977, the City of Garden Grove formed the Main Street Assessment District (MSAD) No. 1 to provide fu
nds for the construction and maintenance of special public improvements along Main Street. Those include planters, trees, streetscaping, sidewalks, benches, trash receptacles, drinking fountains, streetlights, drainage, and bollards.

Following formation of the District, assessments were adjusted periodically as the cost of providing services increased. The current assessment rate has not been increased since 1989. The existing assessment was deemed to be exempt from the requirements set forth in Section 4 of Article XIIID by Section 5(a) following the passage of Prop 218 in 1996 which added Article XIIID to the State Constitution.

Any increase to the current assessment after July 1, 1997 is subject to the requirements of Section 4 and may not be increased without the approval of the property owners within the District.

The assessment rate was proposed to be increased for Fiscal Year 2004-05 to keep up with the rising costs and the higher levels of maintenance requested by the businesses within this Assessment District.

Notices and ballots were mailed to all property owners in the District in accordance with Section 4, Article XIIID of the California State Constitution (Proposition 218). On June 8, 2004, the public hearing was held, the ballots were tabulated, and the property owners rejected the proposed assessment increase.

Therefore, the assessments will remain the same in Fiscal Year 2022-23 as in previous years and the services funded by the assessment have been adjusted to match the funds available. No City contribution is made to this District.

In the fall of 2017, Council approved changing the name of the district from “Main Street Assessment District No. 1” to “Downtown Assessment District”.

Page 28 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

2 PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Garden Grove, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: A portion of Main Street from Garden Grove Boulevard to Acacia Parkway and a portion of Garden Grove Boulevard between 150.16 feet west of the centerline of Main Street and 150.06 feet east of the centerline of Main Street, all being within said District.

Descriptions of Improvements
The facilities to be maintained and serviced for the District as described as follows: Facilities include but ar
e not limited to: streetscape improvements including sidewalks, decorative paving, street lights, street trees, and street furniture, including bollards, benches, trash receptacles, drinking fountains, miscellaneous planters, and related items within the boundaries of said District.

Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities.

The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing and describing the general nature, location, and the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the Director of Public Works and are incorporated herein by reference.

Page 29 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

3 PART III – COST ESTIMATE
The City's budget for the operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting details the estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2022-23 as available at the time of preparation of this Report, and includes engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the District proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. The 1972 Act also has provisions for establishing a separate reserve to fund capital improvements as part of the assessment. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Proposed
Fiscal Year
2021-22
Proposed
Fiscal Year
2022-23*
Starting Fund Balance (Fund Balance as of July 1) $95,674 $91,442 Estimated Revenues
Total Estimated Assessments: $26,700 $26,700
Interest $500 $500
Subtotal Revenues: $27,200 $27,200
Estimated Expenditures
Trash Pick Up $0 $0
General Maintenance $16,800 $18,500
Street Lighting $2,000 $2,000
Street Improvements $10,000 $10,000
Main Street Seasonal Banners $3,000 $3,000
Streetscape Cleaning $3,000 $6,400
Professional Services $3,500 $3,500
Administrative Support $2,400 $2,600
Insurance $732 $0
Subtotal Expenditures: $41,432 $46,000
Estimated Year End Fund Balance $81,442 $72,642
Fund Balance Detail
Operating Reserve (50% of O&M) $23,000
Capital Replacement Reserve $49,642
Assessment Detail
Total Front Feet (FF) in Assessment District: 1,340.45 1,340.45 Assessment Rate ($/FF): $19.92 $19.92
* Fund balance adjusted after a District review

Page 30 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

4 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits t
he establishment of assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, landscaping, parks and recreational facilities.

The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that:

The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.

The Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment District if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In addition, Proposition 218, the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which was approved on the November 1996 statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the California Constitution, requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost for the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article XIIID provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. It also requires that publicly owned properties which benefit from the improvements be assessed.

If the assessment is approved by the property owners as required by Article XIIID of the California Constitution, Section 53739 of the Government Code allows that the assessment may be imposed thereafter at “…any rate or amount that is less than or equal to the maximum amount authorized by the voter approved ordinance or resolution”.

Section 53739 also allows that the assessment may be adjusted for inflation based upon a clearly defined formula that is stated in the resolution that is approved by the property owners at an election authorizing the levy of the assessment.

The formula to be used to distribute the costs of providing the enhanced levels of services described in this Report to the assessable parcels within the District was approved by the City Council at the time the District was formed.

Page 31 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

5 Special Benefit Analysis
Street Landscaping - Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade, enhance surroundings and desirability of the properties.

In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated:
"... there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly.... Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City,..." It should be noted that the definition of “parkways” above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping along the roadway.

The ongoing operation and maintenance and operation of streetlights benefit all properties within the District by providing security, safety and community character and vitality as outlined below. Streetlights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area.

BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING
Security and Safety
• Mitigates crime
• Alleviates the fear of crime
• Enhances safe ingress/egress to property
Community Character and Vitality
• Promotes social interaction
• Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image

Methodology
The parcels of land in the District are all commercial properties and are assessed based on a linear foot (
LF) frontage on Main Street and Garden Grove Boulevard. City-owned parking lot properties are not considered to benefit from the improvements and are therefore excluded from assessment. The table below provides the assessment apportionment for the District.

The actual assessments levied in any fiscal year will be as approved by the City Council and may not exceed the maximum assessment rate without receiving property owner approval for the increase.

Previous Estimated Total Maximum
Fiscal Year 21-22 Fiscal Year 22-23 District Fiscal Year 22-23 Total Asmt Total Asmt Frontage* Asmt per LF
$26,700 $26,700 1,340.45 $19.92
* Total frontage may differ due to rounding.

Page 32 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

6 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal year to which this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

A reduced copy of the City of Garden Grove Downtown Assessment District Map is provided on the following page.

Page 33 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Page 34 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates

ACACIA PARKWAY
rr=--- --- --------Sl /
----- ---- t'-- -090-161 - 01 I LEGEND -- ---- - I
089 213-3 4 ~ ??~=-!~~ :-J2_ I -- ---- 000-000-00 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BOUNDARY 089-213-22 090 - 61 Qj I
089-213-38
~--- -------.ii
----------- LOT UNE
-- --- - -· 090-161-04 - -- - DISTRICT BOUNDARY --- ----- -· 090-16 1-34 ------089-213 19 w 089-21.S-18 090- 16"-06 => z 089-213-17 090-161-07
w ---
>
090-161-08
<( 089-213-37 090-tGl - 09 ---------w 090-161-10
> 089- 213- '4 I- 090-161- 1;
0 089- 213- 13 w 090- 161- 12
~ w -
~
(..'.) 089-213- 12 ~ 090-161-13
--------- t-(/) 090-161-14
089-21 3-11 z 090-161-15
<( 090- 161-16
f
f~ ·- --- --- i-----
---
~~
089 - 213-35 ~
0-10 ~--- ---- .., ---------Q.5!Q-161- i7 I
089-213-33 090-161-18: I
I
,_ __________ ,
I
1''=100'
~~
i SCALE:

I
L ~ARq~~- - _.9~_ov~_J BOULEVARD
-
CITY or GARDEN GROVE
-

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM - DOWNTOWN ASSESSMEN T DISTRICT
-·-
Engineer’s Report
Downtown Assessment District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

8 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
The total proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and the amount of the total proposed assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel within the District, as shown on the latest assessment roll at the Orange County Assessor's Office, are contained in the Assessment Roll provided below.

The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.

Proposed
Fiscal Year
Assessor's Linear 2022-23
Parcel No. Feet Asmt
089-213-11 25.50 $507.91
089-213-12 49.50 $985.95
089-213-13 25.00 $497.95
089-213-14 25.00 $497.95
089-213-17 50.00 $995.90
089-213-18 25.00 $497.95
089-213-19 25.00 $497.95
089-213-22 25.00 $497.95
089-213-33 155.09 $3,089.30
089-213-34 101.05 $2,012.98
089-213-35 75.00 $1,493.85
089-213-37 50.00 $995.90
089-213-38 75.00 $1,493.85
090-161-01 47.27 $941.53
090-161-02 50.00 $995.90
090-161-03 50.00 $995.90
090-161-04 25.00 $497.95
090-161-06 25.00 $497.95
090-161-10 25.00 $497.95
090-161-11 25.00 $497.95
090-161-12 25.00 $497.95
090-161-13 25.00 $497.95
090-161-14 25.00 $497.95
090-161-15 25.00 $497.95
090-161-16 50.42 $1,004.27
090-161-17 25.25 $502.93
090-161-18 161.37 $3,214.58
090-161-34 50.00 $995.90
1,340.45 $26,700.00

Page 35 of 376 ends

11 I Harris & Associates

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE,

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN

IMPROVEMENTS IN THE DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED, AND DECLARING

ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT TO PAY THE COST AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE

QUESTION OF THE LEVY OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove, adopted Resolution No. _____, which described existing and any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in the Downtown Assessment District, and ordered the City Engineer to prepare and file a report pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, i.e., Division 15, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter "Act");

WHEREAS, the City Council formed an Assessment District to finance the maintenance of certain improvements under the Act;

WHEREAS, the proposed boundaries of such Assessment District are shown on a map thereof which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in such Assessment District, which map is designated "Assessment Diagram Downtown Assessment District" as part of the report of the City Engineer described more fully herein below and such map is on file in the City Clerk’s Office;

WHEREAS, the City Engineer is competent to make and file with the City Council a report regarding maintenance of the improvements, which is required by the Act;

WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the City Engineer to procure the required information and prepare and present to the City Council the written report of maintenance required by the Act;

WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared the report, and filed it with the City Clerk and presented it to the City Council and the City Council has examined the report;

WHEREAS, under the Act, before levying and collecting assessments in the Assessment District, the City Council is required to adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to do so; and

WHEREAS, the City Council proposes no increase in assessment for a total of $19.92 per linear foot of frontage on Main Street and Garden Grove Boulevard.

Page 36 of 376 ends

Garden Grove City Council
Resolution No. 9679-21

Page 2 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the public interest and necessity require the maintenance of certain improvements in the streets and other public easements as hereinafter described, and the City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments covering the real property benefited by the improvements, pursuant to the Act.

Section 2. The City Council intends to order maintenance of improvements in certain streets, and other public easements, as follows:

A portion of Main Street from Garden Grove Boulevard to Acacia Parkway and a portion of Garden Grove Boulevard between 150.16 feet west of the centerline of Main Street and 150.06 feet east of the centerline of Main Street, all being within the district, including on street parking, sidewalks, center gutter, street lights, street trees, and street furniture, including bollards, benches, trash receptacles, drinking fountains, miscellaneous planters, and related items.

Section 3. The District is designated Downtown Assessment District, and is generally located on Main Street between Acacia Parkway and Garden Grove Boulevard.

Section 4. The report of the City Engineer is hereby approved, and the City Clerk is directed to endorse the fact and date of approval on the report and to file the report in its office. Reference is hereby made to the report, on file with City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained; the boundaries of the Assessment District; and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.

Section 5. An assessment will be levied pursuant to the Act upon all property in Downtown Assessment District subject to assessment under the Act to pay the balance of costs and expenses of the maintenance of the improvements.

Section 6. Notice is hereby given that as there is no increase in the assessment for the 2022-23 Fiscal Year for Downtown Assessment District, there will only be one Public Hearing, which will be held on June 14, 2022, at 6:30 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the City Council may hear same), in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, which is hereby set as the time and place for the Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, in which each signer is interested, sufficient to identify the property, which must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the Public Hearing. In addition, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to be heard at the Public Hearing. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons.

Page 37 of 376 ends

Garden Grove City Council
Resolution No. 9679-21

Page 3 ends

Section 7. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution of Intention to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city of Garden Grove, California, not less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.

Page 38 of 376 ends

Agenda Item - 3.d.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Adoption of Resolutions for
Initiating proceedings for the
Levying of Fiscal Year 2022-
23 Assessment for: City of
Garden Grove Street Lighting
District, Street Lighting District
No. 99-1, the Park
Maintenance District, the
Engineer's Report, and the
intention for fixing a time and
date to conduct a public
hearing. (Action Item)
Date: 5/24/2022

OBJECTIVE
To adopt resolutions initiating proceedings for the levying of FY 2022-23 assessments for (1) the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District, (2) the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1, and (3) the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District (hereafter collectively referred to as District(s)); to adopt the resolution approving the Engineer’s Reports for those Districts; and to adopt the Resolutions of Intention for the levying of FY 2022-23 assessments for those Districts.

BACKGROUND
Annually, the City of Garden Grove levies assessments against properties within the city to pay for the installation, maintenance, and servicing of public street lighting and park maintenance. In order to continue the lighting of streets and the maintenance of parks at the current service levels, it is necessary to initiate the proceedings of levying annual assessments per the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

DISCUSSION
The first step in this process is to adopt the resolutions initiating proceedings and order the City Engineer to prepare and file reports for the Districts. The resolutions are included as attachments A1, A2, and A3. The Engineer’s Report for each District contains a general synopsis, financial summaries, a diagram showing District boundaries and the methodology used to determine the assessment levels per land use category.

Page 39 of 376 ends

The following table summarizes District costs, assessment levels and General Fund contributions to cover each District’s balance. The cost for each property owner was calculated based on benefits received from each District.

FY2022-23 District Assessments

District Name Assessment
Revenue
General Fund
Contribution
Total District
Cost
Street Lighting District $1,346,099 $503,233 $1,849,322 99-1 Lighting $9,879.14

$1,696.72 $11,575.86
Park Maint. District $708,284 $1,698,074 $2,406,358

The rates for each District for FY 2022-23 are the same rates adopted by the City Council in FY 2021-22.

The second step for City Council is to adopt the resolution approving the attached City Engineer’s Report. This resolution is included as Attachment B. The third and final step is the adoption of a resolution declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments for each District (Attachments C1, C2, C3). Per these resolutions, the public hearing date has been set for June 14, 2022.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The adoption of assessments will raise approximately $1,346,099 in revenue for the Street Lighting District, $9,879 for Street Lighting District 99-1, and $708,284 for the Park Maintenance District.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Adopt the attached Resolutions initiating the proceedings and requesting the Engineer to prepare and file a report for: 1) the Street Lighting District (A1), 2) the Street Lighting District No. 99-1 (A2), and 3) the Park Maintenance District (A3);

Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report for: 1) the Street Lighting District, 2) the Street Lighting District No. 99-1, and 3) the Park Maintenance District (B); and

Adopt the attached Resolutions of Intention for the Street Lighting District (C1), Street Lighting District No. 99-1 (C2), and the Park Maintenance District (C3).

By: Trevor Smouse, Sr. Administrative Analyst

Page 40 of 376 ends

•
•
•
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Resolution Initiating
Proceedings - Garden
Grove Street Lighting
District
5/12/2022 Resolution A1_GG_St_Lighting_Initiating_Proceedings.doc Resolution Initiating
Proceedings - Garden
Grove Street Lighting
District 99-1
5/12/2022 Resolution A2_Dist_99-1_Initiating_Proceedings.doc Resolution Initiating
Proceedings - Garden
Grove Park
Maintenance District
5/12/2022 Resolution A3_Park_InitiatingProceedings_Reso.doc Resolution City
Engineer's Report for
the levy of annual
assessment - Garden
Grove Street Lighting
District, Street
Lighting District No.
99-1 and Park
Maintenance District
5/12/2022 Resolution B_Eng_Report_Approval_Reso.doc
Resolution Intention
to Levy and Collect
Assessments -
Garden Grove Street
Lighting District
5/12/2022 Resolution C1_Lighting_ROI_Reso_setting_PH_6-14-

22.doc
Resolution Intention
to Levy and Collect
Assessments -
Garden Grove Street
Lighting District 99-1
5/12/2022 Resolution C2_99-1_ROI_Reso_setting_PH_6-14-22.doc Resolution Intention
to Levy and Collect
Assessments -
Garden Grove Park
Maintenance District
5/12/2022 Resolution C3_Park_ROI_Reso_setting__PH_6-14-22.doc FY 2022-23 Engineer's
Report - Street
Lighting District
5/12/2022 Backup Material RPT_-_SLD_FY22-23_05-11-22.pdf FY 2022-23 Engineer's
Report - Street
Lighting District 99-1
5/12/2022 Backup Material RPT_-_SLD_99-1_FY22-23_05-09-22.pdf FY 2022-23 Engineer's
Report - Park
Maintenance District
5/12/2022 Backup Material RPT_-_PMD_FY22-23_05-09-22.pdf

Page 41 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE) INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2022-23 FISCAL YEAR

FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT AND ORDERING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 OF CHAPTER 1 OF SAID ACT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE FINDS:

The City Council of the City of Garden Grove formed the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District (formerly the Garden Grove City Landscaping and Lighting District [Resolution No. 6357-83] pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “Act”).

The Act requires that proceedings for the levy of annual assessments after the formation of an Assessment District shall be initiated by resolution describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements, and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Garden Grove:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Garden Grove hereby proposes the levy of an annual assessment for the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for Fiscal Year 2022-

23. SECTION 2. The proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are generally described as the installation, maintenance, and servicing of public street lighting facilities including traffic signals, necessary for the proper maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks throughout the city.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby orders the City Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk a written report in accordance with Sections 22565 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.

Page 42 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET SEQ. OF

THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE) INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2022-23 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1 AND ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 OF CHAPTER 1 OF SAID ACT

The City Council of the City of Garden Grove formed the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “Act”) and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Garden Grove:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Garden Grove proposes the levy of an annual assessment for the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

SECTION 2. The proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are generally described as the maintenance and servicing of public street lighting within the Assessment District.

Page 43 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND ORDERING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 OF CHAPTER 1 OF SAID ACT

The City Council of the City of Garden Grove formed the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District (Resolution No. 7981-97) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “Act”) and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

The Act requires that proceedings for the levy of annual assessments after the formation of an Assessment District shall be initiated by Resolution describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements, and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Garden Grove:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Garden Grove hereby proposes the levy of an annual assessment for the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for Fiscal Year 2022-

23. SECTION 2. The proposed improvements may be briefly described as the maintenance of public parks throughout the city.

Page 44 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT REGARDING THE LEVY OF AN ANNUAL

ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT, CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1 AND THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RESOLVES,
DETERMINES, AND ORDERS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Garden Grove, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code, did by previous resolutions order the City Engineer to prepare and file reports in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act in connection with the proposed levy of an annual assessment for the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District, City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1, and the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

SECTION 2. The City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council such City Engineer’s report for the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2022-23, City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1 for Fiscal Year 2022-23, and City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-

23. SECTION 3. The City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the City Engineer’s report, and the report is hereby approved as filed.

Page 45 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE) DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 AND SETTING A

TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LEVY OF THE PROPOSED

ASSESSMENTS

The City Council of the City of Garden Grove adopted Resolution ____, initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 within the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District describing the proposed improvements and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, i.e., Division 15, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “Act”).

The City Engineer has prepared the report, filed same with the City Clerk and presented same to the City Council, with the City Council examining and approving the report.

Under the Act, before levying and collecting assessments in the Assessment District, the City Council is required to adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to do so.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RESOLVES, DETERMINES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the public interest and necessity require the installation, maintenance, and servicing of public lighting facilities in the streets of the city as hereinafter described, and the City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 covering the real property benefited by the improvements, pursuant to the Act.

SECTION 2. The proposed improvements are generally described as follows:

The maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks throughout the city, namely the installation, maintenance, and servicing of public street lighting facilities including traffic signals.

SECTION 3. The Assessment District is designated as the “City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District.” The boundaries of the District are generally coterminous with the boundaries of the city of Garden Grove, and generally include all parcels within the city.

Page 46 of 376 ends

Garden Grove City Council
Resolution No. _____

Page 2 ends

SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the City Engineer’s report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District.

SECTION 5. An assessment will be levied pursuant to the Act upon all property in the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2022-23, subject to assessment under the Act, as described in the City Engineer’s report. No assessment shall be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local agency. The rates of the assessment to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are not proposed to increase from the rate levied in Fiscal Year 2021-22.

SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that June 14, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the City Council may hear same), in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place for a Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessments. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, stating all grounds of objection. Protests by property owners must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. In addition, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard at the Public Hearing. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested person.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution of Intention to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city of Garden Grove, California, with the publication being not less than ten (10) days prior to the date herein fixed for the Public Hearing.

Page 47 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE) DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 AND

SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LEVY OF THE

PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS

The City Council of the City of Garden Grove adopted Resolution No. ____, initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 within the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1 describing the proposed improvements and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, i.e., Division 15, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “Act”).

The City Engineer has prepared the report, filed same with the City Clerk and presented same to the City Council, with the City Council examining and approving the report.

Under the Act, before levying and collecting assessments in the Assessment District, the City Council is required to adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to do so.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RESOLVES, DETERMINES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the public interest and necessity require the maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities as hereinafter described, and the City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 covering the real property benefited by the improvements, pursuant to the Act.

SECTION 2. The proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are generally described as the maintenance and servicing of public street lighting within the Assessment District.

SECTION 3. The Assessment District is designated as the “City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1.” This District consists of the following areas: the first involving an area easterly of Dale Street between Lampson Avenue and Chapman Avenue and an area west of Fairview Street approximately 900 feet

Page 48 of 376 ends

Garden Grove City Council
Resolution No. ____

Page 2 ends

south of Trask Avenue, the second involving an area on Gail Lane north of Chapman Avenue.

SECTION 5. An assessment will be levied pursuant to the Act upon all property in the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1 for Fiscal Year 2022-23, subject to assessment under the Act, as described in the City Engineer’s report. Parcels within the District that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local or regional governmental agency, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements. The rates of the assessment to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are not proposed to increase from the rates levied in Fiscal Year 2021-2022.

SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that June 14, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the City Council may hear same), in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place for a Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessments. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, stating all grounds of objection. Protests by property owners must contain a description of the property, in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of the City prior to the conclusion of the Public Hearing. In addition, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard at the Public Hearing. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested person.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution of Intention to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Garden Grove, California, with the publication being not less than ten (10) days prior to the date herein fixed for the Public Hearing.

Page 49 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE) DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 AND SETTING A

TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LEVY OF THE PROPOSED

ASSESSMENTS

The City Council of the City of Garden Grove adopted Resolution No. _____, initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2022- 23 within the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District, describing the proposed improvements and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, i.e., Division 15, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “Act”).

The City Engineer has prepared the report, filed same with the City Clerk and presented same to the City Council with the City Council examining and approving the report.

Under the Act, before levying and collecting assessments in the Assessment District, the City Council is required to adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to do so.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RESOLVES, DETERMINES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the public interest and necessity require the maintenance of public parks in the city, and the City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 covering the real property specially benefited by the park maintenance, pursuant to the Act.

SECTION 2. The proposed improvements are generally described as the maintenance of public parks throughout the city.

SECTION 3. The Assessment District is designated as the “City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District.” The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the city of Garden Grove, and generally include all parcels within the city.

SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the City Engineer’s report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the

Page 50 of 376 ends

Garden Grove City Council
Resolution No. _____

Page 2 ends

boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District.

SECTION 5. An assessment will be levied pursuant to the Act upon all property in the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022- 23, subject to assessment under the Act, as described in the City Engineer’s report.

Parcels within the District that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local or regional governmental agency, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements. The rates of the assessment to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are not proposed to increase from the rates levied in Fiscal Year 2021-22.

SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that June 14, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the City Council may hear same), in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place for a Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessments. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk stating all grounds of objection. Protests by property owners must contain a description of the property, in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of the City prior to the conclusion of the hearing. In addition, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard at the hearing. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested person.

Page 51 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
ENGINEER’S REPORT

STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

May 11, 2022

REPARED BY

22 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
www.weareharris.com

Page 52 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE
I
B Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Engineer’s Certification .................................................................................................. i Part I - Overview ........................................................................................................... 1 Part II - Plans and Specifications ................................................................................... 3 Part III – Cost Estimate .................................................................................................. 4 Part IV - Method of Apportionment ............................................................................. 6 Appendix A - Assessment Diagram ............................................................................. 14 Appendix B- Assessment Roll ...................................................................................... 16

Page 53 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

i
ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION
AGENCY: THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

PROJECT: STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT

TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the annual levy of assessments within the Street Lighting District of the City of Garden Grove to provide lighting services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Services will be provided through June 30, 2023.

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 5(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Garden Grove’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for:

STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Overview: Provides the background and reason for the District.

PART II
Plans and Specifications: Plans and specifications for the existing and ultimate improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference.

Page 54 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

PART III
Cost Estimate: An estimate of the costs of the maintenance and/or servicing of the existing and ultimate improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-23, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment: The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the maintenance and/or servicing of the existing and ultimate improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll

DATED: May 11, 2022

___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Orange
State of California

Page 55 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates
B Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

1 PART I – OVERVIEW
This Report as filed complies with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“Act”). Also part of this report, but not bound herein, is the assessment roll on file with the City Clerk which indicates each property’s assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Following the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996 which added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, the City has continued to levy assessments within the District at the current rate since Proposition 218 allowed certain exemptions for existing assessments as set forth in Article XIIID, Section 5(a). The City has to make a contribution to the District annually because revenues from the assessment are less than the cost for the services provided by the District. For Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City will be required to contribute $503,233 to balance the budget. Any increase in the assessment, including the addition of a CPI escalator, will require that a ballot be mailed to each property owner subject to the assessment, and that a majority of property owners (weighted by assessment amount) returning their ballot must approve of the increase in the assessment. In addition, any other changes needed to comply with the requirements of Proposition 218 would have to be made at that time.

The proposed lighting maintenance assessment revenue for Fiscal Year 2022-23, as described in this Report, is approximately $1,346,099. The typical homeowner’s assessment will be $28.71, which is the same as that assessed for lighting prior to the passage of Proposition 218 and last year. The estimated fund balance at the end of Fiscal Year 2022-23 is expected to be zero.

Page 56 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

2 Current Financial Summary

Adopted
Fiscal Year
2021-22
Proposed
Fiscal Year
2022-23

REVENUE
Uncommitted Fund Balance (as of July 1) $0 $0
Estimated Assessment Revenue $1,338,348 $1,346,099
General Fund Contribution $409,565 $503,233
Subtotal Est. Revenue $1,747,913 $1,849,332

EXPENSES
Estimated Operating Expenses $1,747,913 $1,849,332
Capital Improvements $0 $0
Subtotal Est. Expenses $1,747,913 $1,849,332
Estimated Uncommitted Fund Balance (as of June 30) $0 $0

Page 57 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

3 PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Garden Grove, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows:

Street Lighting - The plans for local lighting including alley lighting, and certain arterial lighting, consist of the lamp location list, the Diagram, and the County Assessor’s Maps, all of which are on file in the City Clerk’s office and are incorporated herein by reference.

The Diagram shows the existing District boundaries and includes all of the areas of the District with existing street lights. The lamp location list is a tabulated listing of every street in the District by street in alphabetical order. Included in the items listed for each lamp is the exact location by street address, number and lamp size. Lamps are not placed in specific zones, unless they clearly only benefit certain parcels (e.g., Main Street lights, which are funded through the Downtown Assessment District).

The County Assessor’s Maps show each parcel, including its parcel number and the dimension of each parcel in the District. Preceding the Assessor’s Maps is an information sheet, which gives instructions for finding an individual parcel’s street lighting assessments and for finding lamp locations. These maps are available for inspection in the Engineering Services Division of the Public Works Department.

Specifications for street lighting within the District are indicated within a previously executed contract dated July 22, 1958, by and between the City of Garden Grove and Southern California Edison Company, a copy of which is attached by reference to this report.

Traffic Signals and Freeway Lighting - Maps showing the location of traffic signals and freeway lighting within the District, and specifications showing the general nature, location and extent of proposed capital improvements, are on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.

Page 58 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

4 PART III – COST ESTIMATE
The City's budget for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting details the estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2022-23 as available at the time of preparation of this report, and includes engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the District proceedings.

Note: Amounts above are rounded to whole number sand may be off slightly due to rounding.

T
he 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District.

Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Estimated
Costs
Allocated
Engineering &
Incidentals
Contributions
from Other
Funds
Total to
Assessment
Local Lighting Cost
(f
rom Street Lighting Cost Table) $881,285
Total Local Lighting Cost $881,285 $253,776 ($402,001) $733,060 Alley Lighting Costs
(from Street Lighting Cost Table) 2,078.64 $
Total Alley Lighting Cost $2,079 $599 ($1,193) $1,484
Arterial Lighting Cost to All Assessable Properties:

Arterial Lighting Cost $304,378
Signal Maintenance $243,117
Freeway Underpass Lighting (LS3 Sched. incl. in Arterial Lights above) $5,000 Total Arterial Lighting Cost $552,495 $159,098 ($100,038) $611,555 Total Lighting Costs $1,435,859 $413,473 ($503,233) $1,346,099 Engineering and Incidentals
2181021000 Management - Regular Salaries $25,446
2185101000 Public Works General Administration Regular Salaries $41,095 2185241465 Street Lighting Regular Salaries $211,794
2185241465 Overtime $1,703
2185241465 Commodities $2,540
2185241465 Insurance / Liability $41,095
2185241465 Facilities Maint., Finance Mgmt., Operational and General $63,300 Admin Support
2185241465 Contractual Services $26,500
Total Engineering and Incidentals $413,473
Starting Fund Balance (Fund Balance as of July 1, 2022) $0 General Fund Contribution to balance budget ($503,233)
Total Contributions from Other Funds ($503,233)
Estimated Reserve (Fund Balance as of June 30, 2023) $0 Total Estimated 2022-23 Assessment $1,346,099

Page 59 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

5 The detail of the estimated cost of operating, maintaining and servicing local and arterial street lighting including alleys and safety lights within the District for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is set forth below:

1 The costs above represent the conversion of the Edison-owned and City-owned street lights to light e
mitting diode (LED). The new LED rate changes are reflected in current budgeted estimated costs.

STREET LIGHTING - EDISON OWNED
Local Lighting:

WaKs Lamp Size Number Cost
22 3,000 L 6 @ $ 11.62 x 12 mos. 836.64$
31 4,000 L 4,266 @ 12.25 x 12 mos. 627,102.00
39 5,000 L 1,665 @ 12.68 x 12 mos. 253,346.40
5,937 881,285.04$ 881,285.04$
Alley Lighting:

WaKs Lamp Size Number Cost
31 4,000 L 10 @ $ 12.25 x 12 mos. 1,470.00$
39 5,000 L 4 @ 12.68 x 12 mos. 608.64
14 2,078.64$ 2,078.64$
Arterial Lighting:

WaKs Lamp Size Number Cost
71 8,500 L 19 @ $ 15.37 x 12 mos. 3,504.36$
82 10,000 L 1,212 @ 16.58 x 12 mos. 241,139.52
136 15,000 L 51 @ 20.38 x 12 mos. 12,472.56
1,282 257,116.44$ 257,116.44$
STREET LIGHTING - CITY OWNED (Arterial)
WaKs Lamp Size Number Cost
39 9,500 L 6 @ $ 1.75 x 12 mos. 126.00$
71 16,000 L 55 @ 3.40 x 12 mos. 2,244.00
138 27,500 L 580 @ 6.45 x 12 mos. 44,892.00
641 47,262.00$ 47,262.00$
TOTAL 1,187,742.12$ 1

Page 60 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

6 PART IV - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits t
he establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, landscaping and park and recreational facilities.

Section 22573, of the Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
Exemption from Articles XIIC and XIID
As a result of the passage of Proposition 218 by Voters on November 5, 1996, Articles XIIIC and XIIID were ad
ded to the California Constitution. The new procedural and approval process outlined in these articles apply to those districts that do not qualify for an exemption as provided therein. There are several exemptions provided, including: 1) a district that received prior voter approval, 2) a district originated with a petition signed by 100 percent of the property owners in the district, or 3) a district complying with the requirements set forth in Section 5(a) of Article XIIID that states:
“…assessments existing on the effective date of this Article shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 [if they were] imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control.” The street lighting assessment existed in Fiscal Year 1996-97 and funded improvements that are classified as street improvements. Street improvement as defined herein is based on the definitions provided by the Office of the Controller for the State of California in the Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures published by the Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs. The state’s gas tax program is administered in city agencies, but audited by the Office of the State Controller. The proceeds of the gas tax are

Page 61 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

7 statutorily limited to expenditures for streets and roads. Because the funds are restricted to street and road costs, the State Controller has developed “Street Purpose Definitions and Guidelines” based on the Manual of Uniform Highway Accounting and Financial Management Procedures developed by the American Association of State Highway Officials. Street improvement, as it relates to this District, is defined as the construction, operation, or maintenance of facilities within the right-of-way used for street or road purposes including but not limited to the following:
• Installation or expansion of the street lighting system including replacement of old equipment with superior equipment, installation of traffic signals at intersections and railroad crossings, replacement of equipment as required for relocations for street purposes, and purchase and installation of traffic signal control equipment.
• Servicing lighting systems and street or road traffic control devices including repainting and repairing traffic signals and lighting standards; and furnishing of power for street and road lighting and traffic control devices.

Therefore, the assessments levied for street improvements as defined above are exempt from the Article XIIID procedural and approval process.

Special Benefit Analysis
L
ocal Lighting - The installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting along streets and alleys in close proximity to certain lots or parcels provides a special benefit to such lots or parcels, by providing illumination resulting in: 1) improved security of such lots or parcels, 2) improved ingress and egress from such lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset, and 3) improved nighttime visibility for the local access of emergency vehicles. In the case of commercial lots or parcels, these local lights, by improving ingress and egress, facilitate the opening and operation of businesses after sunset.

Arterial Lighting - The installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of arterial lighting (including traffic signals, intersection safety lighting, freeway underpass lighting, and lighting on arterial streets) provides a special benefit to each and every assessable lot or parcel within the District by: 1) improved nighttime visibility for the access of emergency vehicles, and 2) improved safety and traffic circulation to and from parcels citywide.

Methodology
L
ocal Lighting Assessment
The special benefit from operation, maintenance and servicing of local street lighting within the District only accrues to those parcels within the District located in areas where such lighting is provided.

Therefore, parcels without local street lighting are not assessed for the cost of providing such lighting.

Generally, a parcel is determined to have local lighting provided if a street light is within approximately 90 feet of the parcel.

Page 62 of 376 ends

11 I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

8 The benefit from local lighting can be measured by increased safety to people and property, as well as the increased availability of lighting. In order to establish the proportionate share of local lighting benefit to any parcel of land in relation to the total special benefits to be received by local lighting, it is necessary to establish a benchmark to relate that one parcel to all others. The benchmark is called the Assessment Unit (AU). The District uses the Single Family Residence (SFR) as the benchmark AU. All other land uses will be compared to the benchmark of the Single Family Residence to gain a comparative Assessment Unit based on population and parcel size as described below. For parcels with local lighting, there exists the core benefit of available lighting for every parcel in the District near a street light. This “Availability” benefit is apportioned to parcels with local lighting in the District on a per parcel basis, and has been assigned one-fourth of the SFR Assessment Unit. In addition to this benefit, parcels in the District benefit from improved safety related to people who own or use the parcels in the District (“Safety to People”), which has been assigned one-half of the SFR Assessment Unit. Parcels also benefit from improved safety related to the parcel itself (“Safety to Property”), which has been assigned one-fourth of the SFR Assessment Unit. The three benefit factors are then added together for a total of 1 AU per SFR.

Safety to People Benefit + Safety to Property Benefit + Availability Benefit = SFR Benefit 1/2 AU 1/4 AU 1/4 AU 1 AU Safety to People
Assessment law requires that benefit be apportioned to parcels in the District based on the benefit the land receives. It is not, however, contradictory to relate the benefit property receives to the benefit people owning or using such property receive from improved safety as a result of the District’s improvements. The Safety to People benefit results in a benefit to land, especially in residential properties, because clearly what is good for people improves the property desirability and the ability to sell homes, rent apartments, or mobile home spaces.

What is good for people is also important to the Nonresidential and Nonprofit properties in the District.

Nonresidential properties receive Safety to People benefit from street lighting through the reduction in criminal acts to employees in their parking lots as well as related traffic safety of employees.

Therefore, the Safety to People benefit received by Nonresidential parcels is, at a minimum, that amount received by single family parcels for every portion of the Nonresidential property equal in size to a typical single family parcel. In addition, in order to distribute benefit between the Nonresidential parcels, the individual lot size of each Nonresidential parcel will be used to compute the parcel’s benefit points.

Nonprofit properties benefit from local street lighting through the reduction in criminal acts to members or visitors on property grounds as well as traffic safety to people traveling to and from the property.

However, on an ongoing basis, nonprofit properties generally have an inconsistent number of people using the facilities on a day-to-day basis. Unlike an office, warehouse, or retail establishment, a typical nonprofit facility will have one or two days of intense use and more days of less intensive use where a

Page 63 of 376 ends

11 I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

9 small staff takes care of necessary duties. Therefore, the nonprofit parcels should be assessed at a lower level than other Nonresidential properties, with a minimum assessment equal to a single family residence.

The safety benefit as it relates to safety of the person is apportioned to properties in the District based on the following demographic population information for residential uses as provided by the City of Garden Grove Planning Department. The Nonresidential and Nonprofit uses are related to the residential uses utilizing the Single Family Residential average density of 7,200 square feet as shown in Table 1:

Safety to Property
Both Residential and Nonresidential properties, including Commercial, Industrial, Nonprofit and Vacant parcels, receive benefit from local lighting operation, maintenance and servicing related to the protection of buildings, personal property, business equipment, inventory, materials, etc. located on the property.

The Safety to Property benefit is apportioned to properties in the District based on relative property size as available from the City of Garden Grove Planning Department for Residential uses and Assessor’s Parcel Maps for Nonresidential land uses.

For the Residential uses, an average density has been used to determine the per unit parcel size. The Nonresidential, Nonprofit and Vacant uses are related to the Residential uses utilizing the Single Family Residential average density of 7,200 square feet as shown in Table 2:

Land Use Description Population
per Unit
Rounded % of
SFR
Safety to People
Benefit (1/2)
Single Family Residential (SFR) 3.51/unit 100% 0.50
Con
dominium 3.02/unit 85% 0.43
Multiple Family Residential 3.38/unit 95% 0.45
Mobile Home 1.50/unit 40% 0.20
Nonresidential 3.51/7,200 sq. ft. 100% 0.50
Nonprofit 1.755/7,200 sq. ft. 50% 0.25
Vacant 0/parcel 0% 0.00
TABLE 1 - POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS (SAFETY TO PEOPLE)
Land Use Description Square Feet
per Unit
Rounded % of
SFR
Safety to Property
Benefit (1/4)
Single Family Residential (SFR) 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.25 Co
ndominium 3,300 sf/unit 46% 0.12
Multiple Family Residential 2,600 sf/unit 36% 0.09
Mobile Home 3,700 sf/unit 51% 0.13
Nonresidential 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.25
Nonprofit 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.25
Vacant 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.25
TABLE 2 - AVERAGE DENSITY PER LAND USE (SAFETY TO PROPERTY)

Page 64 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

10 In determining the benefit for local lighting, larger properties do not necessarily receive benefit in proportion to their larger size, because a large share of the property may not be protected by the light on the street. In addition, these properties would typically have to provide their own privately funded lighting system in order to afford protection to their entire lot. To account for this, Safety to Property benefit points per unit will only be assigned up to 20 dwelling units or 20 times 7,200 square feet (144,000 square feet) for Nonresidential and Vacant properties. However, a lower maximum assessment, based on 5 dwelling units or 36,000 square feet, is appropriate for the nonprofit parcels, because these properties are less susceptible to criminal activity since the services provided on the premises are not for profit.

Table 3 shows the breakdown of the Assessment Unit benefit points assigned to each land use for those properties located in areas with local street lights.

Land Use Description Safety to
People
Safety to
Property
Availability
Benefit Total AU's
Single Family Residential (SFR) .50/unit .25/unit .25/p arcel 1.00/parcel Condominium .43/unit .12/unit .25/parcel .79/parcel
Multi-family up to 20 units .45/unit .09/unit .25/parcel .54/unit + .25/parcel Multi-family more than 20 units .45/unit 1.80/parcel .25/parcel .45/unit + 2.05/parcel Mobile Home up to 20 units .20/unit .13/unit .25/parcel .33/unit + .25/parcel Mobile Home more than 20 units .20/unit 2.60/parcel .25/parcel .20/unit + 2.85/parcel Nonresidential minimum 7,200sf * .50/parcel .25/parcel .25/parcel 1.00/parcel Nonresidential 7,200 to 144,000sf .50/7,200sf .25/7,200sf .25/parcel .75/7,200sf + .25/parcel Nonresidential > 144,000sf .50/7,200sf 5.00/parcel .25/parcel .50/7,200sf + 5.25/parcel Nonprofit minimum 10,800sf * .50/parcel .25/parcel .25/parcel 1.00/parcel Nonprofit 10,800 to 36,000sf .25/7,200sf .25/7,200sf .25/parcel .50/7,200sf + .25/parcel Nonprofit > 36,000sf .25/7,200sf 1.25/parcel .25/parcel .25/7,200sf + 1.50/parcel Vacant minimum 7,200sf .00/7,200sf .25/parcel .25/parcel .50/parcel Vacant 7,200 to 144,000sf .00/7,200sf .25/7,200sf .25/parcel .25/7,200sf + .25/parcel Vacant maximum > 144,000sf .00/7,200sf 5.00/parcel .25/parcel 5.25/parcel *Minimum assessment is equal to a single family residence TABLE 3 - LOCAL LIGHTING BENEFIT FACTORS

Page 65 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

11 Table 4 provides a summary of assessment units for the different land uses for local lighting benefit.

T
he rate per AU is calculated by dividing the total budget amount by the total number of AU's:

Arterial Lighting
All parcels in the District receive a special benefit from the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of traffic signals and freeway lighting as well as the operation, maintenance and servicing of safety lighting and street lighting on arterial streets. The arterial lighting, traffic signals, safety lighting, freeway lighting, and capital improvements (Arterial Lighting) are provided throughout the City and all properties in the City may easily access these improvements. In contrast to Local Lighting, Arterial Lighting benefits properties primarily because the properties, and the persons using the properties, are provided safe arterial street access. Therefore, Arterial Lighting benefit will be apportioned to Residential and Nonresidential parcels in the District on a per unit basis taking into account demographic population information.

Nonresidential and Nonprofit parcels rely in large part on the flow of through traffic to attract employees, members and customers, and therefore benefit from Arterial Lighting, at least as much as single family residential parcels. Accordingly, these parcels are assessed the minimum that would be assessed to a 7,200 square foot Residential parcel. Since larger parcels, which attract more employees, members and customers, derive a greater benefit from the traffic signals and safety lighting than smaller parcels, the assessment for a Nonresidential or Nonprofit parcel is calculated based on the square footage of the parcel.

Arterial Lighting benefit is based on the demographic population information shown in Table 1 (Population Demographics) above. All residential uses are related based on the average population for the respective land use. The Nonresidential and Nonprofit land uses have been assigned a minimum single family factor Single Family Residential 22,038 22,040 0 22,040.000
Condominium 5,925 5,966 0 4,713.140
Multiple Family Residential 1,063 12,689 0 6,711.460
Mobile Home 12 1,197 0 273.600
Nonresidential * 1,510 0 68,241,251 7,109.381
Nonprofit * 124 0 8,074,333 426.756
Vacant 60 0 902,659 48.071
30,732 41,892 77,218,243 41,322.408
Square feet shown are total square feet. Nonresidential and Nonprofit parcels are assessed a minimum of 1 AU.
*
Totals
Total AU's
TABLE 4 - LOCAL LIGHTING ASSESSMENT UNIT SUMMARY
Parcels Dwellings Square FtLa nd Use Description
$733,060 / 41,322.408 AU's = $17.74 / AU

Page 66 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

12 under the premise that regardless of the Nonresidential use, the minimum benefit to the parcel is that of a single family residence.

The single family factor of 1.0 benefit point per unit is assigned to every 7,200 square foot portion of a Nonresidential parcel with every parcel assigned a minimum of 7,200 square feet. The 7,200 square feet is based on the City of Garden Grove Planning Department information regarding typical zoning density for single family houses of six homes per acre as shown in Table 2 (Average Density Per Unit) above.

Nonprofit parcels benefit from safe arterial street access and the flow of through traffic to attract members. Because Nonprofit parcels are typically used less intensively than other Nonresidential uses, they are assessed at a lower rate than the Nonresidential uses. Nonprofit parcels are assessed at one-half the rate of the Nonresidential uses, with a minimum assessment equal to a single family residence.

Table 5 shows the breakdown of the Assessment Units assigned to each land use for all assessable property in the District.

Land Use Description Total AU's
Single Family Residential (SFR) 1.00 / unit
Co
ndominium 0.85 / unit
Multiple Family Residential 0.95 / unit
Mobile Home 0.40 / unit
Nonresidential 1.00 / 7,200 sf *
Nonprofit 0.50 / 7,200 sf *
Vacant 0.25 / parcel
*Minimum assessment is equal to a Single Family Residence (SFR) TABLE 5 - ARTERIAL LIGHTING BENEFIT

Page 67 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

13 Table 6 provides a summary of assessment units for the different land uses for arterial lighting benefit.

The rate per AU is calculated by dividing the total budget amount by the total number of AU's:

A
lley Lighting
Residential properties fronting alleys with local alley lighting are assessed for local alley lighting contiguous to such parcels in addition to any other lighting benefits. These properties receive a special and direct benefit from the local alley lighting. There are currently 58 single family residential parcels receiving this benefit, therefore the rate per parcel is calculated by dividing the total budget amount by the total number of parcels:

Engineering and Incidental Expenses
All parcels within the District benefit from the ongoing operation of the District. Therefore, all parcels assessed in the District receive a share of the administrative costs for the District based on their lighting benefit.

Total Assessment
The total assessment for each parcel is the sum of its assessments for local lighting, alley lighting, arterial lighting, engineering and incidentals, and, if appropriate, its assessment for Downtown Assessment District Lighting improvements.

Single Family Residential (SFR) 26,316 26,319 26,319.000 Condominium 5,926 5,971 5,075.350
Multiple Family Residential 1,147 13,454 12,781.300
Mobile Home 14 1,559 623.600
Nonresidential * 1,545 74,103,891 10,353.809
Nonprofit * 124 8,045,326 575.175
Vacant 79 1,035,917 19.750
35,151 47,303 83,185,134 55,747.984
Square feet shown are total square feet. Nonresidential and Nonprofit parcels are assessed a minimum of 1 AU.
*
Totals
Total AU's
TABLE 6 - ARTERIAL LIGHTING ASSESSMENT UNIT SUMMARY
Parcels Dwellings Square FtLa nd Use Description
$611,555 / 55,747.984 AU's = $10.97 / AU
$1,484 / 58 parcels = $25.59 / Parcel

Page 68 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

14 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the area assessed for Downtown Assessment District Lighting (nonresidential properties on Main Street between Acacia Parkway and Garden Grove Boulevard previously titled “Main Street Assessment District No. 1”) is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal year to which this report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report.

A reduced copy of the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting Maintenance District Map is provided on the following page.

Page 69 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Page 70 of 376 ends

4 ---5
6 --
IMN..._
8 --
10 11
12 ll
~,-
16 11
18 19
20 --21
22 2J
2•
.L · _ o
H I Harris & Associates
i
~ ! --
.. ,
i ! --_ ,...._ . n,;
. L..' ; :I ::··· -.I!..:-:·· L ·:.··· L:: .. :_1. ·::::1c · .... J::-_ :·:] , .. --::-~·L_ ... it..-~1':~-::i..~ --i::::...: 1f ;,~; r , :: . .c.~-:-.:...1_·.:::.:s:::::::1= .:..L -·..,_
---
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

16 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
The total proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and the amount of the total proposed assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel within the District, as shown on the latest assessment roll at the Orange County Assessor's Office, are contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.

Page 71 of 376 ends

11 I Harris & Associates

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
ENGINEER’S REPORT
STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

May 9, 2022

REPARED BY

22 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
www.weareharris.com

Page 72 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE
I
B Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Engineer’s Certification .................................................................................................. i Part I - Overview ........................................................................................................... 1 Part II - Plans and Specifications ................................................................................... 2 Part III – Cost Estimate .................................................................................................. 3 Part IV – Method of Apportionment............................................................................. 5 Appendix A – Assessment Diagram ............................................................................ 12 Appendix B- Assessment Roll ...................................................................................... 16

Page 73 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

i
ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION
AGENCY: THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

PROJECT: STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1

TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the annual levy of assessments within the Street Lighting District No. 99-1 of the City of Garden Grove to provide lighting services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Services will be provided through June 30, 2023.

STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Overview: Provides the background and reason for the District.

PART II
Plans and Specifications: Plans and specifications for the existing and ultimate improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference.

Page 74 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the maintenance and/or servicing of the existing and ultimate improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.

Appendices
A
ppendix A – Assessment Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll

DATED: May 9, 2022

___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Orange
State of California

Page 75 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates
■ Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

1 PART I – OVERVIEW
This Report is prepared pursuant to the City Council action taken at their regular meeting ordering a Report for the Street Lighting District No. 99-1 and the levy of assessments for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023. This Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Proposition 218 as stated in Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution (hereinafter referred to as “Articles”), and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as “Act”).

Background
The City of Garden Grove currently levies an assessment for street lighting on parcels throughout the City t
hrough its Citywide Street Lighting District (hereinafter referred to as “Citywide SLD”). Since the formation of the Citywide SLD, two non-contiguous residential areas have been annexed and incorporated into the City pursuant to LAFCO Annexation No. 141. These two areas were previously provided local and arterial street lighting by the County of Orange. The City is now required to provide resources in order to maintain the current levels of service for both local and arterial lighting for these two areas. Zone 1 is assessed for local and arterial lighting within this District. Zone 2 is assessed for local lighting only in this District, while the arterial lighting is covered by the Citywide SLD.

The assessment methodology contained herein incorporates an analysis of general benefit and special benefit as approved by the City Council at the time the District was formed. The assessments to be levied on each property do not exceed the reasonable cost of proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel from the funded operation and maintenance of street light improvements.

In addition to LAFCO Annexation No. 141, six owners of residential property, in a contiguous area of the City currently within Citywide SLD and assessed for arterial lighting only, petitioned the City for the installation and maintenance of a single local street lamp to benefit their properties. Therefore, the annual costs of maintaining the local and arterial lighting that benefit these property owners is to be assessed annually through the District.

Page 76 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

The improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District are that portion of the local and arterial street lighting system of the City of Garden Grove that confers special benefit to the District parcels. The specific location of both local and arterial street light improvements within the City can be found on the Street Light Inventory Maps maintained by the City and on file in the office of the City Engineer where they are available for inspection.

Article XIIID of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, and engineering and incidental costs relating to the operation and maintenance of the local and arterial lighting benefiting the District parcels.

The local street lighting improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District include all Edison owned street lights within the right-of-way of the local public streets located within the boundaries of the District as displayed in Exhibit A. These lights are all within close proximity to the District parcels and provide special benefit to such parcels.

The arterial street lighting improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District include a reasonable allocation of all Edison-owned street light operation, maintenance and servicing on the major arterial streets within the City that provide special benefit to Zone 1. Arterial lighting for parcels within Zone 2 is currently provided by an assessment through the Citywide SLD and are not part of the District improvements.

Page 77 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

3 PART III – COST ESTIMATE
The City's budget for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting details the estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2022-23 as available at the time of preparation of this Report, and includes engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the District proceedings.

Lighting Cost Zone 1 Zone 2 Total
Lamp Size Number
4,000 lumen LED bulbs 43 @ $139.32 per year $5,870.94 $119.82 $5,990.76 Engineering & Incidentals (1) $818.97 $16.71 $835.68
Cost Local Lighting $6,689.91 $136.53 $6,826.44
Arterial Lighting Cost (2) $3,789.28 $0.00 $3,789.28
Less: City Contribution (3) ($1,250.46) $0.00 ($1,250.46) Engineering & Incidentals (1) $660.00 $0.00 $660.00
Cost Arterial Lighting $3,198.82 $0.00 $3,198.82
Total Lighting Cost $9,888.73 $136.53 $10,025.26
District Engineering (4) $1,529.48 $21.12 $1,550.60
Total 2022-23 District Expense Budget* $11,418.21 $157.65 $11,575.86 General Fund Contribution (5) ($1,645.51) ($51.21) ($1,696.72) Estimated Assessment Revenue
Local Assessment $5,967.20 $106.44 $6,073.64
Arterial Assessment $3,805.49 $0.00 $3,805.49
Total Estimated 2022-23 Assessment $9,772.70 $106.44 $9,879.14 Cost per assessed parcel SINGLE FAMILY $28.71 $17.74
CONDOS/TOWNHOMES $23.33
MULTI-FAMILY Varies
VACANT Varies
(1) Engineering and Incidentals include, but are not limited to, City Engineering department maintenance. (2) Gail Lane property owners pay for arterial lighting through the Citywide SLD. (3) City contribution represents 33% of arterial lighting cost relating to general benefit. (4) District engineering includes the cost of compliance with Proposition 218. (5) General Fund contribution required to offset shortfall due to fixed assessment rates. * Fund Balance included in the Citywide District

Page 78 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

4 The Edison-owned street lights were converted to light emitting diode (LED) in 2018 and the City owned lights were converted to LED in 2020.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District.

Page 79 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

5 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits t
he establishment of assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, landscaping and park and recreational facilities.

Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Zones of Benefit
The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment District if "by reason o
f variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
The District has two zones of benefit which were established at the time of formation to apportion the cost of the District improvements based on proportional special benefit conferred on each property in the zones. The District provides Zone 1, as described below, both local and arterial lighting benefits and provides Zone 2 local lighting benefit only. Zone 2, as described below, is currently assessed for arterial lighting through the Citywide SLD.

Zone 1
Zone 1 of the District is comprised of property within LAFCO Annexation No. 141 that incorporates into the City boundary two non-contiguous residential areas. The first annexation area includes 290 parcels in the area northeast of the corner of Dale Street and Lampson Avenue. The second annexation area includes 54 parcels on the west side of Fairview Avenue, south of Trask Avenue. These areas are displayed on separate maps as Appendix A.

Page 80 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

6 Zone 2
Zone 2 includes 6 single-family residential parcels located on Gail Lane, north of Chapman Avenue. This area of the City was without local street lighting, and the property owners of the parcels petitioned the City for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of a single local street light on Gail Lane that benefits their properties.

Boundaries of the District
The boundaries of Street Lighting District No. 99-1 are three non-contiguous residential areas in the City an
d are shown on the maps on file in the office of the City Engineer and attached as Appendix A.

In addition, Article XIIID Section 4 of the State Constitution requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Section 4 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits.

Methodology
General Benefit
T
he City recognizes that a portion of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the City’s arterial lighting improvements funded by the District provide a general benefit to the public at large. City traffic studies have shown that 33% of the City traffic flow on arterial streets is related to through traffic from surrounding regional areas. This pass-through traffic is an appropriate measure of the general benefit provided by the maintenance, operation and servicing of arterial lights. Therefore, the City is making a contribution of funds to the District equal to or in excess of the 33% of the estimated arterial lighting costs for the District. This amount is shown in the Estimated District Budget as the “City Contribution”.

Special Benefit
Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution define special benefit as “a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute ‘special benefit’.” The method of assessment for each Zone analyzes the special benefit each parcel receives from the improvements funded in each Zone. The costs are spread to the individual parcels based on their assigned Assessment Units.

Page 81 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

7 Assessments for the District are being levied to provide funding for the following:

1. The operation, maintenance, and servicing of local street lights in close proximity, within approximately 90 feet, to certain lots and parcels which provide a direct special benefit to such lots or parcels.

2. The operation, maintenance, and servicing of arterial street lights which provide a special benefit to all the assessable parcels within the District whether or not such parcels are in close proximity to such lighting.

Local Lighting Apportionment
The special benefit from operation, maintenance and servicing of local street lighting within the District only accrues to those parcels within the District located in areas where such lighting is provided.

Therefore, parcels without local street lighting are not assessed for the cost of providing such lighting.

Generally, a parcel is determined to have local lighting provided if a street light is within approximately 90 feet of the parcel.

The benefit from local lighting can be measured by increased safety to people and property, as well as the increased availability of lighting. In order to establish the proportionate share of local lighting benefit to any parcel of land in relation to the total special benefits to be received by local lighting, it is necessary to establish a benchmark to relate that one parcel to all others. The benchmark is called the Assessment Unit (AU). The District uses the Single Family Residence (SFR) as the benchmark AU. All other land uses will be compared to the benchmark of the Single Family Residence to gain a comparative Assessment Unit based on population and parcel size as described below. For parcels with local lighting, there exists the core benefit of available lighting for every parcel in the District near a street light. This “Availability” benefit is apportioned to parcels with local lighting in the District on a per parcel basis, and has been assigned one-fourth of the SFR Assessment Unit. In addition to this benefit, parcels in the District benefit from improved safety related to people who own or use the parcels in the District (“Safety to People”), which has been assigned one-half of the SFR Assessment Unit. Parcels also benefit from improved safety related to the parcel itself (“Safety to Property”), which has been assigned one-fourth of the SFR Assessment Unit. The three benefit factors are then added together for a total of 1 AU per SFR.

Safety to People Benefit + Safety to Property Benefit + Availability Benefit = SFR Benefit 1/2 AU 1/4 AU 1/4 AU 1 AU
Safety to People
The Safety to People benefit results in a special benefit to residential parcels because local street lighting improves traffic safety during ingress and egress to the property and creates a deterrent to crime against people on the property. Vacant, non-developable properties within the District are not perceived to receive Safety to People benefit.

Page 82 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

8 The Safety to People benefit is apportioned to properties in the District based on the following demographic population information for residential uses as provided by the City of Garden Grove Planning Department, as shown in Table 1.

Safety to Property
The Safety to Property benefit results in a special benefit to both residential and vacant non-developable parcels because local lighting operation, maintenance and servicing provides for the protection of buildings and personal property against crimes such as theft and vandalism. The Safety to Property benefit is apportioned to properties in the District based on relative property size as available from the City of Garden Grove Planning Department for residential uses.

For all residential uses, an average density has been used to determine the per unit parcel size. Vacant uses are related to the Residential uses utilizing the Single Family Residential average density of 7,200 square feet as shown in Table 2.

In determining the benefit for local lighting, larger properties do not necessarily receive benefit in p
roportion to their larger size, because a large share of the property may not be protected by the light on the street. In addition, these properties would typically have to provide their own privately funded lighting system in order to afford protection to their entire lot. To account for this, Safety to Property benefit points per unit will only be assigned up to 20 dwelling units or 20 times 7,200 square feet (144,000 square feet) for Vacant properties.

Table 3 shows the breakdown of the Assessment Unit benefit points assigned to each land use for those properties located in areas with local street lights.

Land Use Description Population
per Unit
Rounded % of
SFR
Safety to People
Benefit (1/2)
Single Family Residential (SFR) 3.51/unit 100% 0.50
Co
ndominium 3.02/unit 85% 0.43
Multiple Family Residential 3.38/unit 95% 0.45
Vacant 0/parcel 0% 0.00
TABLE 1 - POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS (SAFETY TO PEOPLE)
Land Use Description Square Feet
per Unit
Rounded % of
SFR
Safety to Property
Benefit (1/4)
Single Family Residential (SFR) 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.25 Co
ndominium 3,300 sf/unit 46% 0.12
Multiple Family Residential 2,600 sf/unit 36% 0.09
Vacant 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.25
TABLE 2 - AVERAGE DENSITY PER LAND USE (SAFETY TO PROPERTY)

Page 83 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

9 T
able 4 provides a summary of assessment units for the different land uses for local lighting benefit.

The rate per AU is calculated by dividing the total budget amount by the total number of AU's:

Arterial Lighting Apportionment
A
ll parcels in the District receive a special benefit from the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of traffic signals and freeway lighting as well as the operation, maintenance and servicing of safety lighting and street lighting on arterial streets. The arterial lighting, traffic signals, safety lighting, freeway lighting, and capital improvements (Arterial Lighting) are provided throughout the City and all properties in the City may easily access these improvements. In contrast to Local Lighting, Arterial Lighting benefits properties primarily because the properties, and the persons using the properties, are provided safe arterial street access. Therefore, Arterial Lighting benefit will be apportioned to parcels in the District on a per unit basis taking into account demographic population information.

Vacant properties, which have no people residing on the property, also benefit from arterial lighting because of the convenience associated with emergency vehicle access and other traffic that must use the arterial streets to service the vacant properties in the District. Therefore, Vacant parcels are assigned a Land Use Description Safety to
People
Safety to
Property
Availability
Benefit Total AU's
Single Family Residential (SFR) .50/unit .25/unit .25/p arcel 1.00/parcel Condominium .43/unit .12/unit .25/parcel .79/parcel
Multi-family up to 20 units .45/unit .09/unit .25/parcel .54/unit + .25/parcel Multi-family more than 20 units .45/unit 1.80/parcel .25/parcel .45/unit + 2.05/parcel Vacant minimum 7,200sf .00/7,200sf .25/parcel .25/parcel .50/parcel Vacant 7,200 to 144,000sf .00/7,200sf .25/7,200sf .25/parcel .25/7,200sf + .25/parcel Vacant maximum > 144,000sf .00/7,200sf 5.00/parcel .25/parcel 5.25/parcel TABLE 3 - LOCAL LIGHTING BENEFIT FACTORS
Single Family Residential 284 284 278.00 6.00 284.000
Condominium 52 52 41.08 0.00 41.080
Multiple Family Residential 13 26 17.29 0.00 17.290
Vacant 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
349 362 0 336.37 6.00 342.370Totals
Total AU'sPa rcels Dwellings Square FtLand Use Description Zone 2 AU'sZone 1 AU's TABLE 4 - LOCAL LIGHTING ASSESSMENT UNIT SUMMARY
/ 342.370 AU's = $17.74 / AU$6,073.64

Page 84 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

10 per parcel benefit point. Vacant parcels are assigned 0.25 benefit points per parcel, based on the core benefit attributable to every assessable parcel in the District from Arterial Lighting.

Table 5 shows the breakdown of the Assessment Units assigned to each land use for all assessable property in the District.

Table 6 provides a summary of assessment units for the different land uses for arterial lighting benefit.

The rate per AU is calculated by dividing the total budget amount by the total number of AU's:

District Engineering Costs
D
istrict Engineering Costs include legal, assessment engineering, and other engineering related costs necessary to achieve the District’s compliance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution. All parcels in the District benefit from the District Engineering Costs. Each parcel in the zone is allocated a proportionate share of the District Engineering Cost based on its assigned benefit points.

Total Assessment
The total assessment for each parcel is the sum of its assessment for local and arterial lighting. Table 7 summarizes the Fiscal Year 2022-23 assessment rates for the various land uses in Zones 1 and 2.

Land Use Description Total AU's
Single Family Residential (SFR) 1.00 / unit
Co
ndominium 0.85 / unit
Multiple Family Residential 0.95 / unit
Vacant 0.25 / parcel
TABLE 5 - ARTERIAL LIGHTING BENEFIT
Single Family Residential 278 278 278.000 0.000 278.000 Condominium 52 52 44.200 0.000 44.200
Multiple Family Residential 13 26 24.700 0.000 24.700
Vacant 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
343 356 0 346.900 0.000 346.900Totals
Total AU's
TABLE 6 - ARTERIAL LIGHTING ASSESSMENT UNIT SUMMARY
Parcels Dwellings Square FtLa nd Use Description Zone 1 AU's Zone 2 AU's $3,805.49 / 346.900 AU's = $10.97 / AU

Page 85 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

11 Zone 2
Single-family
R
esidential
Condos/
Townhomes
Multi-family
Residential 1 Vacant 2
Single-family
R
esidential
Assessment per parcel per unit per unit per parcel per pa r cel Local $17.74 $14.01 $9.58 $4.44 $17.74
+ $4.44 per
parcel
+ $4.44 per
parcel
Arterial $10.97 $9.32 $10.42 $2.74 N/A
Total $28.71 $23.33 Varies Varies $17.74
1 Multi-Family Residential rate shown is for Multiple Family Residential parcels up to 20 units 2 Vacant rate shown is for a Vacant parcel sized between 7,200 to 144,000 SF Zone 1
TABLE 7 - SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT RATES

Page 86 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

12 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The Assessment Diagram, which shows the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District, is on file in the offices of the City Engineer and the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by reference.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the Fiscal Year to which this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

Page 87 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Page 88 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY lll,HfS ~

GARDEN GROVE CITY LIMITS

ALAMITOS
INITRMEOIA TE SCHOO<.
8 I!:
"' < <> < :c
I
City Of Garden Grove
I I
•
. . Department Of Public Works
R/W NO:
■ I Harris & Associates
PREPARED BY :
f.A.

DRAWN BY:

IA.B.

PROJECT NO. : CHECKED BY:
210 J.S.

APPR0\1£0 BY :
-c-m~r-N-G!=Ntt~R--

STREET LIGHTING
DISTRICT No. 99-1
ZONE 1 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY BlJT IS COIAPll.£D FROIA EXISTING RECORDS Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Page 89 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
-· l RANC1i£RO WAY --•---- r---
~
W
::1 f--- -'
,- Q
hi i.t ~ 0 w
Cl' 1---- - ·- er
,_ t.;; - -··- · ·-- -< w
VJ
j j Ji-
:r
:'.J -- ----
u - -z
<(
-' oc
:J
"--- ·
ffiASK AVENUE
---
' I w
LJ
t-
1 I?
oc ~ :, <(
1--- 0
~
()
w
I
I i'=
-'
I
<(
a, ~
I 0
I oc oc a:: w r-- '(Q
(;
- w
·~ .~
:;;:

L...
,__
(~
t--
I
~
,-
t-- DR. !£ROY L. DOIG
t-- INITRMEDIATE SCHOOi..
f---
f---
.
f--
--

GARDEN GROVE CITY LIMITS
fYHG NO. :

Ii
City Of Garden Grove
A-XXXX
. PREPARED BY : . Department Of Public Works
C
-
T.A.

DllAWN BY:

1.1.B.

STREET LIGHTING R/W NO:

PROJECT NO. : CHECKED BY:
210 J.S.

DISTRICT No . 99-1 SCAt.£: 1•-200·
APPR<NED BY :
~l!'i' E:fl1llflEER
ZONE I n11s IS NOT A SURVEY BUT IS COW'IUD ffil)IA EXISTING RECORDS ----~-- ---·-
Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Page 90 of 376 ends

R I Harris & Associates

DONNA LANE
/ -
-=::>
It
~~
w
~ __,
(~
__, -;,
<>
\ ~'- 'U:' /
~\_ I r=:::~-
-,
<,J
:z: w
5 z < __,
.... w -w i3 w "' ~ <
Vl ~
i!: z z -' < <>
'- '- Cl
Q-!APMAN A VENUE
-
(
lj;' /
l I
~
<(
.... w
z
- DWG NO. ,
•
City Of Garden Grove

A- XXXX
'
PREPARED BY :

Department Of Public W arks
TA
- DRAWN BY:

IA.B.

STREET LIGHTING
PROJECT NO. : CHECKED BY:

R/W NO: 210 J.S.

DISTRICT No. 99-1 SCALE: 1 •-100•
IJ>PRCNED BY :
~II? EJ.l~lflEER
ZONE2 TiilS IS HOT A SURVEY BUT IS COIAPILED FRO\A EXISTING RECORDS Engineer’s Report
Street Lighting District No. 99-1
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

16 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
An assessment of the estimated cost of maintenance and/or servicing of the existing improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District for the Fiscal Year to which this Report applies are on file in the offices of the City Engineer and the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.

Page 91 of 376 ends

11 I Harris & Associates

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
ENGINEER’S REPORT

PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

May 9, 2022

REPARED BY

22 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
www.weareharris.com

Page 92 of 376 ends

GARDEN GROVE
I
B Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Engineer’s Certification .................................................................................................. i Part I - Overview ........................................................................................................... 1 Part II - Plans and Specifications ................................................................................... 3 Part III – Cost Estimate .................................................................................................. 5 Part IV – Method of Apportionment............................................................................. 6 Appendix A – Assessment Diagram ............................................................................ 17 Appendix B- Assessment Roll ...................................................................................... 19

Page 93 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

i
ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION
AGENCY: THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

PROJECT: PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the annual levy of assessments within the Park Maintenance District of the City of Garden Grove to provide park maintenance services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Services will be provided through June 30, 2023.

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Garden Grove’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for:

PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Overview: Provides the background and reason for the District.

Page 94 of 376 ends

B I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Appendices
A
ppendix A – Assessment Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll

DATED: May 9, 2022

___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Orange
State of California

Page 95 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates
IIII H ·g • 1111 arns Assoc1ates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

1 PART I – OVERVIEW
This Report as filed complies with Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Also part of this report, but not bound herein, is the assessment roll on file with the City Clerk which indicates each property’s City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

In order to comply with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution in Fiscal Year 1997-98, the City Council ordered an Engineer’s Report that complied with the new benefit analysis requirements pursuant to Proposition 218 and submitted the District’s assessments to property owners via mailed ballot which passed by a majority vote but did not include an annual escalator. The new District was formed to fund park maintenance, as more thoroughly described in this Report.

Starting Fiscal Year 2020-21, the City added four parks to the list of parks being maintained. They are:
• Faylane Park
• Gutosky Park
• Jardin De Los Ninos Park
• Spirit of 76 Mini Park
The Park Maintenance District assessment for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 is proposed to total $708,284.

Under the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Park Maintenance District, the typical homeowner will pay $13.75, which represents their proportional special benefit for the cost of maintaining community parks.

For the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the assessments will be levied at the same rate and method as levied last year. The estimated fund balance at the end of Fiscal Year 2022-23 is expected to be zero.

Page 96 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

2 Current Financial Summary

1 See the footnotes below Table 1 - FUNDING BY COMMUNITY PARK on page 9 for the General Benefit c
alculation.
2 Assessment Shortfall equals the Total Assessable Cost from Table 1 - FUNDING BY COMMUNITY PARK o
n page 9 less Estimated Assessment Revenue.
3 Total Costs from Table 1 - FUNDING BY COMMUNITY PARK.

N
OTE: the Amounts shown in the table above have been rounded to whole numbers and may be off slightly due to rounding

Adopted
Fiscal Year
2021-22
Proposed
Fiscal Year
2022-23

REVENUES
Un
committed Fund Balance (as of July 1) $0 $0
City General Fund Contribution:

General Benefit 1 $839,397 $794,100
A
ssessment Shortfall 2 $996,233 $903,974
T
otal City Contribution $1,835,630 $1,698,074
Assessment Revenue $708,002 $708,284
Total Park Maintenance Revenues $2,543,632 $2,406,358

EXPENSES
Operating, Engineering and Incidental Expenses 3 $2,543,632 $2,406,358 Total Park Maintenance Expenses $2,543,632 $2,406,358
Uncommitted Fund Balance (as of June 30) $0 $0
Total City Contribution $1,835,630 $1,698,074
Total To Assessment $708,002 $708,284

Page 97 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

The City currently funds the operation and maintenance of park and recreational improvements, including park and grounds maintenance, for 19 community parks. The City’s park system provides for a uniform distribution of green area and recreation facilities throughout the District’s boundary. Each property in the District is within close proximity of a park facility and specially benefits from the availability of these improvements.

The existing park and recreational facilities to be maintained and serviced are located in the following parks:

The District will fund costs in connection with the maintenance and servicing of the park and recreation facilities including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities. The facilities are described as follows:

Parks and Recreational Facilities
Park and recreational facilities include, but are not limited to: landscaping, lights, athletic fields, p
laygrounds, playground equipment, public restrooms, park furniture, site amenities, and appurtenant facilities which are located within the public parks within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to: Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, h
ardscapes, fixtures, sidewalks and appurtenant facilities.

Atlantis Park Gutosky Park * Twin Lakes Park
Chapman Sports Complex Hare School Park Village Green Park Civic Center Complex Jardin De Los Ninos Park * West Grove Park Eastgate Park Lake School Park West Haven Park
Edgar Park Magnolia Park Woodbury Park
Fayland Park * Pioneer Park
Garden Grove Park Spirit of 76 Mini Park *
* Added in FY 2020-21

Page 98 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

4 Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to: Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors, equipment including g
uys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide lighting.

Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance and servicing of the park and recreational facilities and appurtenant facilities, including:
repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the park and recreation facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other public improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any other improvements and the furnishing of electric energy for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing and describing the general nature, are on file in the office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk and are by reference herein made a part of this Report.

Page 99 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

5 PART III – COST ESTIMATE
The City's budget for the maintenance and servicing of park and recreational facilities details the estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2022-23 as available at the time of preparation of this Report, and includes engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the District proceedings.

Note: Amounts above are rounded to whole numbers and may be off slightly due to rounding.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District.

F
unds raised by assessment revenue shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate.

Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
Community Park & Recreational Facilities $1,706,358
General Fund Contribution ($1,204,111)
Subtotal Operation & Maintenance = $502,247

ENGINEERING & INCIDENTALS
Regular Salaries $430,103
Overtime $0
Commodities $22,251
Equipment Pool Rental $113,381
Contractual Services $134,266
General Fund Contribution ($493,963)
Subtotal Engineering & Incidentals = $206,037
Total to Assessment = $708,284

Page 100 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

6 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits t
he establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, landscaping and park and recreational facilities.

Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In addition, Article XIIID Section 4 of the State Constitution requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Section 4 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits.

Reason for the Assessment
The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the servicing and maintenance of parks and r
ecreational improvements and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services.

Special Park Benefit Analysis
The maintenance and servicing of parks and recreational improvements provide a particular and distinct s
pecial benefit to parcels within the District. The desirability of parcels within the District is specifically enhanced by the presence of well-maintained parks and recreational facilities which are available for the use and enjoyment of residents, customers, clients, employees and visitors of the assessed parcels.

Having properly maintained parks readily accessible to properties within the District means that the

Page 101 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

7 owners and visitors of the assessed parcels may enjoy the benefits of such improvements available for use while the owner avoids the expense of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements.

Each parcel within the District is located within reasonable proximity to a park, and therefore benefits from the improvements provided in that park.

In addition to providing opportunities for recreational use, the property maintenance and servicing of park and recreational facilities improves the aesthetics of nearby parcels through the proper maintenance and servicing of landscaping, reduces pollution and noise in surrounding areas through the provision of open space and the planting of otherwise barren areas, and reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the abatement of graffiti. Also, the proper maintenance and servicing of parks which also serve as drainage basins such as Twin Lakes and similar landscaped areas not only facilitates proper drainage (and thereby reduces the potential for flood damage to properties in the District), but also beautifies and makes safer flood control facilities that would otherwise be unsightly and potentially dangerous. All of the above contribute to the desirability of the properties within the District.

General Park Benefit Analysis
Along with the special benefits received by the parcels in the District, there are general benefits conferred b
y the maintenance, operation and servicing of park and recreational facilities that benefit the public at large.

The general benefit from the park and recreational improvements can be measured by examining the type of facilities used at each park that provide benefit to the public at large. The neighborhood parks provide facilities that, by definition, almost exclusively benefit the surrounding tract neighborhood. In the City’s General Plan, a neighborhood park is meant to be located within walking or biking distance of each property in the neighborhood. The cost of maintaining these parks is not included in the Assessment District.

Community parks provide amenities that are farther reaching, servicing a population between 10,000 and 50,000 within a radius of one to two miles. Each parcel within the District is within two miles of a community park, therefore, each parcel receives a special benefit from community parks. Several of the community parks include pools, sports fields, tennis courts and other community amenities. Community parks also have neighborhood park attributes such as passive and active recreation opportunities focused on neighborhood recreational activities.

E
ach community park has been reviewed to determine the benefit associated with community and neighborhood amenities as defined in the City’s General Plan. The cost of maintenance, servicing and operation associated with the community amenities of the community parks is 65% of the total maintenance, servicing and operation costs. Therefore, 65% of each community park is related to community amenities, while the other 35% is related to neighborhood amenities.

Page 102 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

8 Additionally, each community park has been examined to determine the number of registrations received by the Park and Recreation Department for individuals or teams outside the District boundaries. The ratio of out-of-District registrations to total registrations is used to determine the portion of each park budget that are of general benefit. This proportion has been determined to be 20% for the neighborhood amenities and 40% for the community amenities. Therefore, the portion of the community park’s maintenance, servicing and operation that confers a general benefit to the parcels in the District is 20% of the neighborhood amenities and 40% of the community amenities.

The general benefit associated with the community parks includes the benefit the general public receives from the aesthetic and other environmental improvements associated with open space areas. The general benefit portion of the City’s parks should not be funded through the Assessment District and may be funded through the General Fund or other sources. Therefore, the amount that may be funded through the District for any given community park is comprised of two elements: community amenities – 60% of the 65% of a community park’s operating budget, and neighborhood amenities – 80% of 35% of the community park’s operating budget. The remaining budget confers a general benefit and will be paid from funds other than the District. Based on the above analysis, the amount of park and recreational improvements that may be funded through the District is shown in Table 1.

Page 103 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

9 Methodology
The benefit from parks can be measured by increased safety, the availability of improvements for r
ecreational use, and other property-related benefits. In order to establish the proportionate share of park benefit to any parcel of land in relation to the total special benefits to be received by parks, it is necessary to establish a benchmark to relate that one parcel to all others. The benchmark is called the Assessment Unit (AU). The District uses the Single Family Residence (SFR) as the benchmark AU. All other Park Name Total Park Costs
Assessable
Neighborhood
Amenities (1)
Assessable
Community Park
Costs (2)
Total Assessable
Costs (3)
Atlantis $72,191 $20,213 $28,154 $48,367
G
arden Grove $625,653 $175,183 $244,005 $419,188
Eastgate $72,191 $20,213 $28,154 $48,367
West Grove $120,318 $33,689 $46,924 $80,613
Magnolia $96,254 $26,951 $37,539 $64,490
Woodbury $48,127 $13,476 $18,770 $32,246
Village Green $120,318 $33,689 $46,924 $80,613
Civic Center $216,572 $60,640 $84,463 $145,103
Hare $240,636 $67,378 $93,848 $161,226
Pioneer $72,191 $20,213 $28,154 $48,367
Edgar $96,254 $26,951 $37,539 $64,490
Twin Lakes $96,254 $26,951 $37,539 $64,490
West Haven $168,445 $47,165 $65,694 $112,859
Chapman Sports $48,127 $13,476 $18,770 $32,246
Lake $24,064 $6,738 $9,385 $16,123
Faylane Park $96,254 $26,951 $37,539 $64,490
Gutosky Park $96,254 $26,951 $37,539 $64,490
Jardin De Los Ninos $72,191 $20,213 $28,154 $48,367
Spirit of 76 Mini Park $24,064 $6,738 $9,385 $16,123
Total $2,406,358 $673,779 $938,479 $1,612,258
Note: Amounts in Table 1 are rounded to whole numbers and may be off slightly due to rounding TABLE 1 - FUNDING BY COMMUNITY PARK
(1) The neighborhood amenities portion of the Community Parks is estimated to be 35 percent of the total park costs. The special benefit that may be assessed in the District is 80 percent of the 35 percent associated with neighborhood park amenities (e.g., Twin Lakes: $96,254 x 35% x 80% = $26,951). (2) The community amenities portion of the Community Parks is estimated to be 65 percent of the total park costs. The special benefit that may be assessed in the District is 60 percent of the 65 percent associated with community park amenities (e.g., Twin Lakes: $96,254 x 65% x 60% = $37,539). (3) The Total Assessable Costs shows the total amount that can be spread to the parcels within the district, however due to the fixed assessment rates,the total amount that to be collected by assessments is $708,284.

Page 104 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

10 land uses will be compared to the benchmark of the Single Family Residence to gain a comparative Assessment Unit based on population and parcel size as described below. Based on citizens’ input and engineering judgment regarding the factors involved, it has been determined that park maintenance and servicing benefit primarily stems from increased safety and other property-related benefits. Therefore, the safety portion of the benefit has been assigned two-thirds of the SFR Assessment Unit, and the recreational portion of the benefit has been assigned one-third, to total 1 AU per SFR.

Safety Benefit + Recreation Benefit = SFR Benefit

2/3 AU 1/3 AU 1 AU
In comparing the other land uses to the Single Family Residence, two factors are used: population data and parcel size. The benefit from the availability of improvements for recreational use is apportioned to parcels in the District based on the relative population within a given land use as determined by the City of Garden Grove Planning Department. The benefit to parcels from increased safety and other property- related benefits is apportioned to other residential uses based on average parcel size as compared to the Single Family Residence. The benefit to Nonresidential, Nonprofit, Governmental and Vacant properties for increased safety and other property-related benefits is apportioned based on these parcels’ specific property size as compared to the typical 7,200 square foot SFR lot.

Multiple Family Residential properties such as apartments, mobile homes and condominiums benefit from the park maintenance and servicing funded by the District. Residents of these types of parcels have the opportunity to use the recreational facilities and benefit from safer parks and the other property-related benefits mentioned above. Because Multiple Family Residential properties have fewer people per dwelling (see Table 2), they receive a proportionally smaller benefit from the improvements and their assessments have been decreased accordingly.

Nonresidential parcels, including commercial and industrial properties, benefit from the proper maintenance and servicing of parks, since such parks attract potential customers, employees, and membership from outside the District, and encourage residents of the City to leave their residences and patronize these establishments. All Nonresidential parcels are assessed according to their parcel square footage for safety benefit resulting from park maintenance and servicing. Using the Single Family Residence as a base, Nonresidential properties receive the same number of AU’s as an SFR for every 7,200 square feet of land. Furthermore, Nonresidential parcels less than 7,200 square feet in size are assigned a minimum of 1 AU. Since the safety benefit for an SFR parcel is no less than 1 AU, it is reasonable to set 1 AU as the minimum safety benefit for non-residential parcels.

The benefit of recreational amenities is apportioned to parcels in the District based on population data from the City of Garden Grove Planning Department as shown in Table 2. This table also shows the weighted amount of benefit that each land use receives from having recreational amenities in close proximity. As it was determined that the recreational amenities made up one-third of the total benefits

Page 105 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

11 received, the rounded percentage of each land use’s population, as compared to the SFR’s population, is then multiplied by one-third.

The safety associated with well-maintained parks directly benefits properties because businesses and p
roperty owners want to be located in safe neighborhoods with safe parks. Safety benefit is appropriately measured based on land area for all of the uses. However, it would be impractical to charge different amounts within the residential land uses. Therefore, the residential properties are applied an assessment unit based on the average parcel size of each land use as shown below in Table 3. The table also shows the weighted amount of benefit that each land use receives from the safety associated with having parks in close proximity. As it was determined that the safety factor made up two-thirds of the total benefits received, the rounded percentage of each land use’s population, as compared to the SFR’s population, is then multiplied by two-thirds.

The weighted benefits received from recreation and safety are then added together to determine the as
sessment unit for each of the land uses as shown in Table 4.

Land Use Description Population
per Unit
Rounded % of
SFR
Recreation
Benefit (1/3)
Single Family Residential (SFR) 3.51/unit 100% 0.33
Co
ndominium 3.02/unit 85% 0.28
Multiple Family Residential 3.38/unit 95% 0.32
Mobile Home 1.50/unit 40% 0.13
Nonresidential (min. SFR rate) 3.51/7,200 sq. ft. 100% 0.33 TABLE 2 - POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS (RECREATION)
Land Use Description Square Feet
per Unit
Rounded % of
SFR
Safety
Benefit (2/3)
Single Family Residential (SFR) 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.67 Co
ndominium 3,300 sf/unit 46% 0.30
Multiple Family Residential 2,600 sf/unit 36% 0.24
Mobile Home 3,700 sf/unit 51% 0.34
Nonresidential (min. SFR rate) 7,200 sf/unit 100% 0.67
TABLE 3 - AVERAGE PARCEL SIZE (SAFETY TO PROPERTY)

Page 106 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

12 Nonprofit, Government and Vacant parcels receive less benefit than other Nonresidential parcels in the D
istrict from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City and are therefore assessed at lower levels, as discussed below.

Nonprofit parcels receive less benefit than other Nonresidential parcels in the District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City for several reasons. Nonprofit parcels function differently than Nonresidential parcels in that they: 1) typically operate fewer days in the week, 2) generally have an inconsistent number of people using the facilities daily, and 3) have a less intensive use than the property size alone would indicate because in general the large Nonprofit parcels in the District contain large green areas that function as open space. Since the Nonprofit parcels receive less safety and recreation benefit than Nonresidential parcels, the Nonprofit parcels are assessed at a lower level than the Nonresidential parcels. Nonprofit parcels are assessed at 0.67 AU for every 7,200 square feet of land, with a minimum assessment of 1 AU, and are only assessed for the first 28,800 square feet. Since the safety benefit for an SFR parcel is no less than 1 AU, it is reasonable to set 1 AU as the minimum safety benefit for Nonprofit parcels.

As a result of the passage of Proposition 218, the assessment methodology for the District has to determine the special benefit that should be attributed to public agency parcels within the District boundary. Section 4 of the Proposition states,
“Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that such publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.”
Government properties also benefit from the proper maintenance and servicing of parks, since such parks attract potential employees as shown below. Proper maintenance, operation and servicing of parks benefits Government parcels because:
• they reduce property-related crimes against public parcels within the District, especially vandalism, through the abatement of graffiti;
Land Use Description Recreation
Benefit + Safety Benefit =
Single Family Residential (SFR) 0.33 + 0.67 = 1.00 AU per p arcel Condominium 0.28 + 0.30 = 0.58 AU per parcel
Multiple Family Residential 0.32 + 0.24 = 0.56 AU per unit Mobile Home 0.13 + 0.34 = 0.47 AU per unit
Nonresidential (min. SFR rate) 0.33 + 0.67 = 1.00 AU per 7,200 sf TABLE 4 - ASSESSMENT UNIT CALCULATION
Assessment Unit

Page 107 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

13 • they improve the aesthetics of public parcels through the proper maintenance and servicing of landscaping and the planting of otherwise barren areas; • they reduce pollution and noise in surrounding areas throughout the provision of open space; • having properly maintained parks readily accessible to the public properties means that the public agencies may enjoy the benefits of such improvements available for use while avoiding the expense of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements; and • spraying and treating of landscaping for disease and weed control reduces the likelihood of insect or weed infestation spreading to the landscaping located on public properties with the District.

Government parcels, however, receive less benefit than other Nonresidential parcels in the District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City. For instance, a portion of most public properties within the District is used as a park and/or recreation area. Additionally, Government properties generally do not benefit from the resale value of their properties. Consequently, the specific benefit that is conferred to other properties in the District is not conferred to Government properties.

Therefore, the public parcels are assessed at half the rate of Nonresidential uses, receiving 0.50 AU for every 7,200 square feet of land.

Like Government parcels, Vacant parcels receive a special benefit from the safety improvements due to a decrease in vandalism as a result of the increased desirability of a parcel that is located in areas with a landscaping program. Since there are fewer improvements on a Vacant parcel and people are not using the parcel, the safety benefit to vacant parcels received is lower than other Nonresidential parcels.

Therefore, Vacant parcels are assessed at one-quarter the rate of Nonresidential parcels, receiving 0.25 AU for every 7,200 square feet of land.

The assessment unit formulas for Nonprofit, Government and Vacant parcels are shown below in Table 5.

T
able 6 provides a summary of assessment units for the different land uses for park special benefit.

Land Use Description
Nonprofit 0.67 per 7,200 sf
(1
.00 minimum,

2.68 maximum)
Government 0.50 per 7,200 sf
Vacant 0.25 per 7,200 sf
Assessment Unit
TABLE 5 - ASSESSMENT UNIT FORMULA FOR NONPROFIT,
GO

VERNMENT AND VACANT PARCELS

Page 108 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

14 The rate per AU is calculated by dividing the total budget amount by the total number of AU's:

S
ample calculations for various land use types are provided in Table 7.

Single Family Residential 26,594 26,598 1.00 / unit 26,598.000 Condominium 5,978 6,023 0.58 / unit 3,493.340
Multiple Family Residential 1,162 13,507 0.56 / unit 7,563.920 Mobile Home 14 1,559 0.47 / unit 732.730
Nonresidential * 1,535 0 69,232,773 1.00 / 7,200 sf 9,643.040 Nonprofit * 125 0 8,083,636 0.67 / 7,200 sf 257.201
Government 236 0 45,916,147 0.50 / 7,200 sf 3,188.626
Vacant 78 0 998,891 0.25 / 7,200 sf 34.683
35,722 47,687 124,231,447 51,511.540
Square feet shown are total square feet. Nonresidential and Nonprofit parcels are assessed a minimum of 1 AU. Nonprofit parcels are only assessed for the first 28,800 square feet, or a maximum of 2.68 AU's.
*
Totals
AU Factor Total AU's
TABLE 6 - ASSESSMENT UNIT SUMMARY
Parcels Dwellings Square FtLa nd Use Description
$708,284 / 51,511.540 AU's = $13.75 / AU

Page 109 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

15 Table 8 summarizes the total assessments to be levied by land use. The percentage of each land use’s assessment in relation to the total assessment is also shown below.

TABLE 7

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR VARIOUS LAND USES
Total Assessment
L
and Use AU Calculation AUs @ $13.75 / AU
Single Family Residential 1 DU x 1 AU/DU = 1.000 $13.75 Condominium 1 DU x 0.58 AU/DU = 0.580 $7.98
Multiple Family Residential:

Duplex 2 DU x 0.56 AU/DU = 1.120 $15.40
4-plex 4 DU x 0.56 AU/DU = 2.240 $30.80
10-Unit Apartment 10 DU x 0.56 AU/DU = 5.600 $77.00
Mobile Home Park:
30 Spaces 30 DU x 0.47 AU/DU = 14.100 $193.88
95 Spaces 95 DU x 0.47 AU/DU = 44.650 $613.94
Nonresidential: min. 1 AU
5,000 sf Nonres 1.000 $13.75
10,000 sf Nonres 10,000 sf x 1 AU/7,200 sf = 1.389 $19.10 25,000 sf Nonres 25,000 sf x 1 AU/7,200 sf = 3.472 $47.74 50,000 sf Nonres 50,000 sf x 1 AU/7,200 sf = 6.944 $95.48 Nonprofit: min. 1 AU, max. 2.68 AU
10,000 sf Nonprofit 1.000 $13.75
15,000 sf Nonprofit 15,000 sf x 0.67 AU/7,200 sf = 1.396 $19.20 25,000 sf Nonprofit 25,000 sf x 0.67 AU/7,200 sf = 2.326 $31.98 50,000 sf Nonprofit 2.680 $36.85
Government:
10,000 sf Nonres 10,000 sf x 0.50 AU/7,200 sf = 0.694 $9.54 25,000 sf Nonres 25,000 sf x 0.50 AU/7,200 sf = 1.736 $23.87 50,000 sf Nonres 50,000 sf x 0.50 AU/7,200 sf = 3.472 $47.74 Vacant:
10,000 sf Nonres 10,000 sf x 0.25 AU/7,200 sf = 0.347 $4.77 25,000 sf Nonres 25,000 sf x 0.25 AU/7,200 sf = 0.868 $11.94 50,000 sf Nonres 50,000 sf x 0.25 AU/7,200 sf = 1.736 $23.87

Page 110 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

16 Note: Amounts in Table 8 are rounded to whole numbers and may be off slightly due to rounding.

Land Use
Residential (Single Family, Multi-Family, Condo and
Mo
bile Home) $527,835 75%
Nonresidential (Commercial, Industrial) $132,592 19%
Nonprofit (Churches) $3,537 0%
Government (Schools, City Property) $43,844 6%
Vacant $477 0%
Approximate 2022-23 Assessments to Be Collected $708,284 100% Residential properties comprise 75% of the District assessment amount, the remaining property types comprise 25% of the total District assessment amount.

TABLE 8 - SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENTS BY LAND USE
Approximate
20 22-23 Total
Assessments by
Land Use
Assessments by Land
Use as a % of the Total
District Assessments

Page 111 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

17 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City Boundary and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference.

A reduced copy of the City of Garden Grove Park Maintenance District Map that was created when formed is provided on the following page.

Page 112 of 376 ends

= I Harris & Associates
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

Page 113 of 376 ends

■ I Harris & Associates
--... __
8 9
10 11
10 12
---
.......
17 18
I
18 ,.
21 I
I I I
~ -·-- 4J"-- - - --i-- --'t-- ---f-- - - ----ji!---f-- --J:-- -+---+-- --l ~ --• :~·:.:..:::1•·=-=·.:-:o.•=·.:-::11.:-::-:::r:c.=:1r=-=·::r:r..:::·-=·-_:-·::i1..:.:··:::·-:i:c::::·::·=.,,::·-:.:::··:J1•c-=-:·::r1=::r=::::r=::;c=-·-1-.::..1c .. ::-:r:J :.:::::i:= ::c.:=.y,::--=:-;"' ~~l~ !:'...::==i ___ £:-=c:=i::"""= "::i.:..,:.:::.:.r.:=:::t:= ::u.:=::i::=::::::~ -----
Engineer’s Report
Park Maintenance District
City of Garden Grove
Fiscal Year 2022-23

19 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
The total proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and the amount of the total proposed assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel within the District, as shown on the latest assessment roll at the Orange County Assessor's Office, are contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.

Page 114 of 376 ends

11 I Harris & Associates
Agenda Item - 3.e.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Tom DaRé
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Police Chief
Subject: Authorization to issue a
purchase order to Motorola
Solutions for police
motorcycle radios. (Cost:
$58,000) (Action item)
Date: 5/24/2022

OBJECTIVE
To obtain City Council authorization to issue a purchase order to Motorola Solutions to purchase four (4) police motorcycle radios.

BACKGROUND
The purchase of two fully-equipped police motorcycles was approved in both the adopted FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 City budgets, for a total of four motorcycles.

The appropriations also included funds for the purchase of a police radio for each motorcycle.

DISCUSSION
On September 14, 2021, the Police Department requested a purchase order be issued to Motorola for seven vehicle radios, utilizing pricing in the Motorola Orange County Equipment and Services Price Book Agreement #MA-060-21010004. The City Council authorized that purchase and also approved dispensing with bidding for a sole source purchase pursuant to Garden Grove Municipal Code 2.50.060(C). This sole source purchase will be made pursuant to that approval and utilizing the same price book agreement.

The cost of each radio configuration is approximately $14,111, for a total of approximately $56,444, including tax. The Department requests, however, that the purchase order be issued in the amount not to exceed (NTE) $58,000 to account for any minor variations in costs or unanticipated increases prior to the purchase order being issued.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds were appropriated in FYs 2021-22 and 2022-23 for the purchase of four (4) fully- equipped police motorcycles. There is no additional impact to the General Fund.

Page 115 of 376 ends

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Authorize the Finance Director to issue a purchase order to Motorola Solutions for the purchase of (4) police motorcycle radios.

By: Courtney Chibosky, Fiscal Analyst

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Motorola_4 motor radio
quote 5/12/2022 Backup Material Motorola_4-Motor_radio_quote.pdf Minutes_9-14-
2021_Motorola 5/12/2022 Backup Material Minutes_2021_9_14_Meeting_Motorola- 7_vehicle_radios.pdf
Council report_9-14-
2021_Motorola 5/12/2022 Backup Material Motorola-_7_car_radios-council_9-14- 2021.pdf

Page 116 of 376 ends

•
Motorola Solutions Attention: Kim Caplan Christine Toth Quote: 03292021GGHRRM 10680 Treena Street, Suite 200 Phone: 858-442-3979 Phone: 517-376-0485 San Diego, Ca 92131 [email protected]@bearcom.com PREPARED FOR: Rebecca Meeks
AGENCY : Garden Grove
Qty: Model Description List Price Price Book Extended
APX6500 MOBILE HOT RED RECEIVER MOTORCYCLE RADIO AES ENCRYPTION

HOT RED RECEIVER GREEN RADIO MOTORCYCLE-PRIMARY RADIO FOR MOTORCYCLE CONFIGURATION 4 M25URS9PW1BN APX6500 ENHANCED 700/800 MHZ MID POWER MOBILE 10-35 WATT $9,793.00 $7,099.00 $28,396.00 4 G806 ENH: ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX
4 G51 ENH: SMARTZONE OPERATION APX
4 G361 ADD: P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE
4 GA09008 ADD:GROUP SERVICES
4 G996 ADD: PROGRAMMING OVER P25 (OTAP)
4 G298 ENH: ASTRO 25 OTAR W/ MULTIKEY
4 G843 ADD: AES ENCRYPTION
4 GA00805 ADD: APX O7 CONTROL HEAD.
4 G444 ADD: APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE
4 G67 ADD: REMOTE MOUNT MID POWER
4 G174 ADD: ADD 700/800 ANTENNA
4 W22 ADD: MOTORCYCLE HAND MICROPHONE
4 B18 ADD: AUXILARY SPKR 7.5 WATT
4 GA00235 ADD: NO GPS/WIFI ANTENNA NEEDED
4 GA001115 ADD: DUAL RADIO STACKABLE MID POWER TRUNNION 4 G138 ADD: APX MOTORCYCLE CH SFWR
4 W620 ADD: NO MTRCYCLE ENCL NEEDED APX
4 GA01116 ADD: DUAL RADIO AUDIO COMBINER
4 GA01113AA ENH: DUAL RADIO OPERATION (PRIMARY RADIO)
4 G78 ADD: ESSENTIAL SERVICE

HOT RED RECEIVER RED RADIO MOTORCYCLE-SECONDARY RADIO FOR MOTORCYCLE CONFIGURATION 4 M25URS9PW1BN APX6500 ENHANCED 700/800 MHZ MID POWER MOBILE 10-35 WATT $8,272.00 $5,997.00 $23,988.00 4 G806 ENH: ASTRO DIGITAL CAI OP APX
4 G51 ENH: SMARTZONE OPERATION APX
4 G361 ADD: P25 TRUNKING SOFTWARE
4 GA09008 ADD:GROUP SERVICES
4 G996 ADD: PROGRAMMING OVER P25 (OTAP)
4 G298 ENH: ASTRO 25 OTAR W/ MULTIKEY
4 G843 ADD: AES ENCRYPTION
4 G88 ADD: NO CONTROL HEAD NEEDED
4 G444 ADD: APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE
4 G67 ADD: REMOTE MOUNT MID POWER
4 G174 ADD: ADD 700/800 ANTENNA
4 G90 ADD: NO MICROPHONE NEEDED
4 G142 ADD: NO SPEAKER NEEDED
4 GA00235 ADD: NO GPS/WIFI ANTENNA NEEDED
4 GA001117 ADD: DUAL RADIO OPERATION (SECONDARY RADIO)
4 G138 ADD: APX MOTORCYCLE CH SFWR
4 W620 ADD: NO MTRCYCLE ENCL NEEDED APX
4 G78 ADD: ESSENTIAL SERVICE

ADDITIONAL MOTORCYCYLE PARTS-REQUIRED ADDITIONAL PARTS FOR MOTORCYCLE CONFIGURATION 4 H1835A 8 MODE DIRECT ENTRY
4 NNTN7279B CONTROL HEAD SUN SHADE/HOOD
Pricing per Orange County Price Book Agreement # MA-060-21010004 QUOTE TERMS AND CONDITIONS :
1) Quotes are exclusive of all installation and programming charges(unless expressly stated) and all applicable taxes. Subtotal $52,384.00 2) Purchaser will be responsible for shipping costs, which will be added to the invoice. Tax $4,059.76 3) Prices quoted are valid for thirty(30) days from the date of this quote. Shipping 4) Unless otherwise stated, payment will be due within thirty days after invoice. Total $56,443.76 Equipment Details and Pricing
5) The information provided in this quote is provided for budgetary purposes only, and does not constitute an offer to sell or license any Motorola product.

Page 117 of 376 ends

"MOTOROLA

-1- 9/14/21

MINUTES

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

Regular Meeting

Tuesday, September 14, 2021

Community Meeting Center
11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92840

CONVENE MEETING

At 6:35 p.m., Mayor Jones convened the meeting with Council Members O’Neill, D.

Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, and Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen present.

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

RECESS

At 6:40 p.m., Mayor Jones recessed the meeting.

RECONVENE

At 7:26 p.m., Mayor Jones reconvened the meeting.

ROLL CALL PRESENT: (6) Council Members O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen,
Mayor Jones

ABSENT: (1) Council Member Brietigam

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

Speakers: John Rowles, Aaron Downs, Kay Kearney, Tom Raber, Tanya Pham, and Don Worshire [sic]

Written Communications: Celeste Rivero, Lucy Dunn, Cecilia Bustamante Pixa, Roy English, Thanh Huynh, Antonella Castro, Leslie Prado, Michelle Murphy, and Tam Nguyen.

Page 118 of 376 ends

-2- 9/14/21

CONSIDERATION OF A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE CALIFORNIA-NEVADA DISTRICT EXCHANGE CLUBS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, INC., FOR CO-

SPONSORSHIP OF THE FIRST ANNUAL GARDEN GROVE VETERANS DAY CELEBRATION (F: 60.2)

Following staff introduction, City Council discussion, and comments from Kay Kearney, event organizer, it was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member O’Neill that:

This matter be postponed for the purpose of getting more information from the event organizers including working towards the inclusion of credible Veterans groups and civic organizations.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A RELOCATION PLAN; APPROVAL OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY; ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION BY THE GARDEN GROVE

HOUSING AUTHORITY APPROVING A HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND LOAN AGREEMENT; AND APPROVAL BY THE GARDEN

GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR EIGHT PROJECT BASED VOUCHER PAYMENTS

FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING LOCATED AT 11742 STUART DRIVE, GARDEN GROVE (JOINT ACTION WITH THE GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY) (F: H-55-American Family Housing)

CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Following staff recommendation, it was moved by Mayor Jones, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen that:

Resolution No. 9707-21 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove, California, approving the Relocation Plan for the Stuart Drive Permanent Supportive Housing Project with rehabilitation and implementation of the project, to be implemented by the developer, American Family Housing, a California non-profit public benefit corporation; and making certain other findings in connection therewith, be adopted; and

A Cooperation Agreement by which the City will transfer $1,400,000 of HOME Program funds to the Housing Authority to implement the project, be approved.

The motion carried by a 5-0-1-1 vote as follows:

Page 119 of 376 ends

-3- 9/14/21
Ayes: (5) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam
Abstain: (1) Bui

HOUSING AUTHORITY ACTION

Following staff introduction, comments from Milo Peinemann, CEO of American Family Housing, and Housing Authority discussion, Commissioner Bui expressed concern with the Relocation Plan.

Following further discussion, it was moved by Chair K. Nguyen, seconded by Commissioner O’Neill that:

Resolution No. 182-21 entitled: A Resolution of the Garden Grove Housing Authority approving the HOME Investment Partnership affordable housing and loan agreement (11742 Stuart Drive); authorizing the Authority Director to implement the HOME Agreement and project documents, finding and determining the project is categorically exempt under CEQA; and, making certain other findings in connection therewith, be adopted; and

Eight Mainstream Project Based Vouchers be allocated as the financial subsidy for American Family Housing to complete and operate the project.

The motion carried by a 6-0-2-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) Beckles, O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Klopfenstein, K.

Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (2) Brietigam, Tindoc
Abstain: (1) Bui

RECESS

At 8:15 p.m., Mayor Jones recessed the meeting.

RECONVENE

At 8:31 p.m., Mayor Jones reconvened the meeting with Council Members O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, and K. Nguyen present.

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ORANGE COUNTY VETERANS CEMETERY IN ANAHEIM HILLS (F: 91.2)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

Page 120 of 376 ends

-4- 9/14/21
Resolution No. 9708-21 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove supporting the Orange County Veterans Cemetery in Anaheim Hills, and encouraging federal, state, and local government support for this much needed project, be adopted.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

ADOPTION OF A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING SEPTEMBER AS NATIONAL RECOVERY MONTH IN GARDEN GROVE (F: 83.1)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

September be recognized as National Recovery Month in Garden Grove.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

ADOPTION OF A PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF GARDEN GROVE HIGH SCHOOL (F: 83.1)

This matter was considered later in the meeting.

EXONERATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS FOR TRACT MAP NO. 18169, A SUBDIVISION PROJECT LOCATED AT 9861 11TH STREET, GARDEN GROVE (F: 103.TT.18169)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

The Public Improvement bonds be exonerated for Tract Map No. 18169, a subdivision project located between Kerry and Brookhurst Streets on the north side at 9861 11th Street, Garden Grove.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Page 121 of 376 ends

-5- 9/14/21
Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER WITH MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS FOR

MOBILE VEHICLE-MOUNTED RADIOS

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

The Finance Director be authorized to issue a purchase order in the approximate amount of $87,078 to Motorola Solutions for the purchase of (7) mobile vehicle- mounted radios; and
The City Manager or his designee be authorized to execute the purchase order and make any minor modifications as necessary thereto on behalf of the City.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF AN INCREASE TO BLANKET PURCHASE ORDERS TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, VULCAN MATERIALS, AND R.J. NOBLE FOR ASPHALT

PRODUCTS

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

The Finance Director be authorized to increase the blanket purchase order for three (3) vendors for asphalt products in the firm and fixed amount of $200,000 for a total of $800,000 per year; and
The City Manager be authorized to review and approve annual renewals, provided that sufficient funds are budgeted for renewal.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

Page 122 of 376 ends

-6- 9/14/21

AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP FOR (4) FOUR NEW UTILITY BODY TRUCKS

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

The Finance Director be authorized to issue a purchase order in the amount of $244,174.63 to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of four (4) new Public Works Department utility body trucks.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

AWARD A CONTRACT TO BLUE VIOLET NETWORKS LLC, TO INSTALL A NEW JAIL SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEM (F: 55-Blue Violet Networks LLC)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

A two year contract be awarded to Blue Violet Network LLC, with an option to extend the agreement for two additional years for professional installation and maintenance services of the jail camera surveillance system;
The City Manager or his designee be authorized to execute the contract on behalf of the City, and make minor modifications as appropriate; and The City Manager or his designee be authorized to execute option years on behalf of the City.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

Page 123 of 376 ends

-7- 9/14/21
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 OF THE AGREEMENT WITH HOWROYD-WRIGHT EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, INC., DBA APPLEONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES FOR TEMPORARY STAFFING (F: 55-Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc., dba AppleOne Employment Services)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

Amendment No. 2 of the agreement with Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc., dba AppleOne Employment Services, in an amount not to exceed $100,000, through June 30, 2022, be approved;
Four additional option year agreements in the amount of $100,000 per year, be approved; and
The City Manager be authorized to execute Amendment No. 2, and option year agreements, and to make minor modifications as appropriate.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

AWARD A CONTRACT FOR RFP NO. S-1284-A TO VALLEY MAINTENANCE

CORPORATION TO PROVIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES AT CITY PARKS (F: 55-Valley Maintenance Corporation)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

A contract be awarded for janitorial services to Valley Maintenance Corporation in the firm, fixed price amount of $146,400 through Fiscal Year 2022, with an annual option to renew the contract in the following amounts: $158,352 for Years 2 and 3, and $170,604 for Years 4 and 5;
The City Manager be authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City and make minor modifications as appropriate thereto; and
The City Manager be authorized to execute each option year.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Page 124 of 376 ends

-8- 9/14/21
Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

RECEIVE AND FILE MINUTES FOR THE MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 24, 2021 (F: Vault)

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

Minutes from the meeting held on August 24, 2021, be received and filed.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

WARRANTS

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen, seconded by Council Member D. Nguyen that:

Payroll Checks 184644 through 184663; Direct Deposits D384820 through D385429; and Wires W2830 through W2833 have been audited for accuracy and have been verified by the Finance Director for payment and be received and filed.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

ADOPTION OF A PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF GARDEN GROVE HIGH SCHOOL (F: 83.1)

Following Council Member Klopfenstein’s invitation to the Mayor and Council to attend the 100 year alumni picnic on Saturday, September 18, 2021, she moved to approve adoption of a Proclamation celebrating the 100th anniversary of Garden Grove High School, seconded by Council Member Bui.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Page 125 of 376 ends

-9- 9/14/21
Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A RELOCATION PLAN; APPROVAL OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY; ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION BY THE GARDEN GROVE

HOUSING AUTHORITY APPROVING A HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND LOAN AGREEMENT; AND APPROVAL BY THE GARDEN

GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR EIGHT PROJECT BASED VOUCHER PAYMENTS

FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING LOCATED AT 11742 STUART DRIVE, GARDEN GROVE (JOINT ACTION WITH THE GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY) (F: H-55-American Family Housing)

This matter was considered earlier in the meeting.

APPROVAL TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 2021-2022 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) (F: 55-State of California Office of Traffic Safety) (XR: 82.15)

Following staff introduction and City Council comment, it was moved by Council Member Bui, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen that:

Participation in the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) be authorized, and grant funding, in the amount of $278,000, be accepted;
Authorize the City Manager as Authorizing Official, the Finance Director as Fiscal Official, and Police Officer Jeremy Morse as Grant Director on behalf of the City; and That Grant monies be allocated to fund Selective Traffic Enforcement Operations.

The motion carried by a 6-0-1 vote as follows:

Ayes: (6) O’Neill, D. Nguyen, Bui, Klopfenstein, K. Nguyen, Jones
Noes: (0) None

Absent: (1) Brietigam

MATTERS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND CITY MANAGER

GRAFFITI ABATEMENT UPDATE AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL (F: 24.5)

Staff provided a graffiti abatement update noting the program has been in place for the past 20 years in conjunction with clean-up of public rights of way. The procedures for choosing the one of the four standard colors and color matching were

Page 126 of 376 ends

-10- 9/14/21
reviewed, as well as addressing graffiti on private property in compliance with Government Code Section §53069.3 and the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 8.64. The City contracts for graffiti removal and contractor employees are trained in color matching. Private property owners who do not remove graffiti are referred to the City’s Code Enforcement Division.

MATTERS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND CITY MANAGER (Continued)

Council Member Bui encouraged everyone to get a COVID-19 vaccination and to wear a mask in order to help other people and prevent the spread.

Council Member Klopfenstein shared that recent Vector Control testing in Garden Grove for the West Nile Virus revealed negative results; however, she encouraged everyone to dump and drain standing water on their property, and to contact Vector Control as a resource for questions and information.

Mayor Pro Tem K. Nguyen expressed appreciation for the Vector Control update, and for positive comments from tonight’s speakers, John Rowles and Aaron Downs.

Council Member D. Nguyen encouraged everyone to support local businesses and to visit Koreatown’s QT Golden Marketplace, a new business on Garden Grove Boulevard in District 3 that offers food, teas, and boba.

Council Member O’Neill congratulated Garden Grove High School for its 100th anniversary. He noted that half of Magnolia Park is closed and under construction, which will be a great improvement on completion. He expressed his condolences to the Pulido family at the passing of the family’s patriarch, Salvador, who at 86 years passed away on August 20, 2021.

City Manager Stiles noted the Be Well deployment team will consist of staff members from Be Well OC, the Orange County Fire Authority, Garden Grove’s Police Department and Community and Economic Development Department. A presentation on Be Well’s deployment steps and protocols will be provided at the September 28, 2021, City Council meeting. With the completion of the Census, the City’s contractual re-districting demographer, David Ely, has reported that there have been no significant changes to the population in Garden Grove from the time that council districts were established, and Mr. Ely will be presenting at the November 9, 2021, City Council meeting.

Mayor Jones expressed condolences to the Bushinsky family for the passing of Garden Grove resident, Ira Bushinsky, who recently passed away from a tragic accident leaving behind his wife Colleen, daughters Sarah and Rachel and five grandchildren.

Page 127 of 376 ends

-11- 9/14/21

ADJOURNMENT

At 8:51 p.m., Mayor Jones adjourned the meeting in memory of Ira Bushinsky. The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 28, 2021, at 5:30 p.m. at the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California.

Teresa Pomeroy
City Clerk

Page 128 of 376 ends

Page 129 of 376 ends

9/15121, 9:50 AM
To:

Dept.:

Subject:

OBJECTIVE
Coversheet
City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Scott C. Stiles From:

City Manager Dept.:

Authorize issuance of a purchase order Date:
with Motorola Solutlons for mobile
vehicle-movnted radios. (Cost:
$87,078) (Action Item)
Tom DaRe
Police Chief
9/14/2021
Agenda Item -3.e.

For the City Council to authorize the issuance of a purchase order to Motorola Solutions in the amount of approximately $87,078 for seven (7) mobJle vehlcle-mounted radios.

BACKGROUND
In Ffscal Year 2019-20, the City Council appropriated funds for the purchase and full outfitting of five (5) patrol vehicles and two (2) traffic enforcement trucks. Due to pandemic-related delays, however, the City was unable to procure new patrol vehicles prior to June 30, 2020.

In order to get addltlonal patrol cars "on the street" as quickly as possible, Public Works Fleet agreed to outfit and put into service vehicles intended for changeovers. In order to do this radios were removed from police vehicles not in use during the pandemic, but this left the Department w!th no radios for those vehicles and no spares. Purchasing seven (7) mobile vehicle-mounted radios will restore the fleet's communications capabilities and allow for three spare radio(s).

RJSCIJSSIOl'JI
Motorola is the exclusive provider to the County of Orange for its countywide inter-agency and publlc safety radio system. Motorola's radio transceivers, accessories, and parts support the P25, BOO MHz radio network for the County of Orange.

The full line of BOO MHz radio subscriber equipment contains programming information that Js locked by a unique System Key, which is only issued to the County of Orange. All radio transceivers contain hardware and a System Key or Factory Software customized to the County of Orange. In addition, all Law and Fire agency subscriber equipment is equipped with hardware encryption that cannot be removed and is specific to the County's public safety platform.

Pursuant to Garden Grove Municipal Code Section 2.0S0.060(c), Motorola Solutions Is a slngle source provider for the mobile vehicle-mounted radios ut!llzed by the Police Department. The City may use the Orange County Equipment and Services Price Book Agreement #MA-060-21010004 for the purchase of patrol vehicle radios from Motorola.

FmANCIAL IMeACT
In FY 2019-20, funds were appropriated for the purchase of five (5) "fully equipped" patrol vehicles and twoJ2) "fully equipped" Traffic enforcement vehicles. Due to pandemic-related delays In procurement, funds were carrle over to FY 2021-22 to execute this project. There is no additional Impact to the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
• Authorize the Finance Director to issue a purchase order in the approximate amount of $87,078 to Motorola Solutions for the purchase of (7) mobile vehicle-mounted radios; and • Authorize the City Manager or his deslgnee to execute the purchase order and make any minor modifications as necessary thereto on behalf of the City.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type
fgges from Motorola Price Book
,&greement #MA-060-2101004 8/25/2021 Backup Material
~
https:l/gardengrove.novusagenda.com/AgendaPubllc/CoverSheet.aspx?ltemlD=3719&Meeling1D=672 file Name
Pages_from_Motorola-
ORANGE_COVNTY _PRICE_BOOK_AGREEM E:NT# _MA-
060-2101004_VS_FINAL_l2-18-2020,pdf
1/2

Page 130 of 376 ends

9/15/21, 9:50 AM
Mot,orola Solutions ouom
~
8/25/2021
Coversheet
Backup Materral
https:/fgardengrove.novusagenda.com/ AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ltemlD=3719&Meeling!D=672 Motorola_GG_HRR_8-25-2021_QUOTE-1397602-
4_(7J_Car _Radlos.pdf
2/2

Page 131 of 376 ends

9/15121, 9:50AM
G

GARDEH GROVE
AGENDA
Garden Grove City Council
Tuesday, September 14,
2021
6:30 PM
Community Meeting
Center, 11300 Stanford
Avenue, Garden Grove,
California 92840
Garden Grove City Council Meetings
Steve Jones
Mayor
Kim B. Nguyen
Mayor Pro Tern -District 6
George S. Brietigam
Council Member -District 1
John R. 0'Nelll
Council Member• District 2
Diedre Thu-Ha Nguyen
Council Member -District 3
Patrick Phat Bui
Council Member-District 4
Stephanie Klopfenstein
Council Member -District 5
COVID-19 Information: Masks are required to be worn and adherence to six foot distancing from others when attending public meetings.

M..u.tmg Assistance: Any person requiring auxlltary aids and services, due to a disability, to address the City Council, should contact the City Clerk's Office 72 hours prior to the meeting to arrange for accommodations. Phone: (714) 741-5040.
~genda Item DescrlP.tlons: Are intended to give a brief, general descriptlon of the Item. The City Councll may take legislative action deemed appropriate with respect to the item and Is not llmlted to the recommended action indicated in staff reports or the agenda.

DocumentsfWrlt)ng1: Any revised or additional documents/Writings related to an item on the agenda distributed to all or a majority of the Council Members within 72 hours of a meeting, are made available for public inspection at the same time (1) in the City Clerk's Office at 11222 Acacia Parkway, Garden Grove, CA 92840, during normal business hours; (2) on the City's website as an attachment to the City Council meeting agenda; and (3) at the Council Chamber at the time of the meeting.

PVhllc Comments: Members of the public desiring to address the City Council are requested to complete a pink speaker card Indicating their name and address, and Identifying the subject matter they wish to address. This card should be given to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting.

General comments are made during 'Oral Communlcatlons" and should be limited to matters under consideration and/or what the City Council has jurisdiction over. Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding a Public Hearing matter will be called to the podium at the time the matter is being considered.

Manner of Addressing~ Councll: After being called by the Mayor, you may approach the podium, !I Is requested that you state your name for the record, and proceed to address the City Council. All remarks and questions should be addressed to the City Council as a whole and not to individual Council Members or staff members. Any person making impertinent, slanderous, or profane remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the City Council shall be called lo order by the Mayor.If such conduct continues, the Mayor may order the person barred from addressing the City Council any further during that meeting.

Time limitation: When any group of persons wishes to address the City Council on the same subject matter, ·the Mayor may request a spokesperson be chosen to represent the group, so as lo avoid unnecessary repetition.At the City Council's discretion, a limit on the total amount of time for public comments during Oral Communications and/or a further ltmlt on the time allotted to each speaker during Oral Communications may be set.
https://ggcity.org/cgl-bln/city _councll/vlew _ video _novus.cgi?id=672 1/3

Page 132 of 376 ends

9/15/21, 9:50 AM Garden Grove City Council Meetings
PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING.

AGENDA
ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBER BRIETIGAM, COUNCIL MEMBER O'NEILL, COUNCIL MEMBER D. NGUYEN, COUNCIL MEMBER BUI, COUNCIL MEMBER KLOPFENSTEIN, MAYOR PRO TEM K. NGUYEN, MAYOR JONES

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (to be held slmultaneou;,ly with other legislative bodies)

2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

2.a. Consideration of a written request from the California-Nevada District Exchange Clubs Charitable Foundation,~, for co sponsorshiP-of the first annual Garden Grove Veterans Dav..

Celebration, (Cost: $31.QJ_(Action Item)_
RECESS
C0NDUO OTHER LEGISLATIVE BODIES' BUSINESS

RECONVENE

3. CONSENT ITEMS
(Co11Sent Items will be acted on simultaneously with one motio11 unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Council Membe1:)

3.a. MQQtlon of a ResolutJon suQRQ.tllng the orange county Veterans Cemetery in Anaheim Hills. (Action Item)

3.b. fill.QQtlon of a Proclamation recognizing~1::1tember as National Recoverv. Month in Garden Grove. (Action Item).

3.c. MPption of a Proclamation celebrating the 100th Anniversary_of Garden Grove High School, (Action Item)

3.d. Exoneration of Public Improvement bonds for Tract MaR No. 18169,. a subdivision Jll'.Qject located at 9861 11th Street, Garden Grove. (Action Item)

3.e. Authorize issuance of a RUrchase order with Motorola So)utions for mobile vehicle-mounted radios. (Cost: $61.,.ill..8.)_(Action Item).

3.f. Authorize the issuance of an Increase to blanket purchase orders to AU American Asplia.lt, Vulcan Materials, and R.J. Noble for asP.halt 12roducts. (Cost; $.200,000)_(Actlon Item).

3.g, Authorize the Issuance of a purchase order to National Auto fleet ~rru.HLfPL<.1) four new utiHty_bod_v. trucks. (~$.iM,174.63). https://ggcity.org/cgi-blnlcity _ council/view_ vldeo_novus.cgi?id"'672 213

Page 133 of 376 ends

9/15/21, 9:50 AM Garden Grove City Council Meetings
!Action Item)

3.h. Award a contract to Blue Violet Networks LLC. to install a new jail survelllance camera system. (Cost; $'il,~L(Action Item)

3.i. Approval of Amendment No. 2 of the agreement with Howroyd.:.

Wright EmQ!.Q.v.ment Ag~v.,~,....d.b.uppleOne Emlili2.y.m.ent Services for temp.lJ..CaJ:Y. staffing,_(~$100,m)_ (Action Item).:.

3.j. Award a contract for RFP No. 5-1284-A to Valley Maintenance .CO...rporatlon to provide janltorlal services at City parks. (Cast... .$..H2Mm <Action Item)

3.k. Receive and file minutes from the meeting held on Aug~,. 2021. (Action Item).

3.1. Receive and flle warrants. (Action Item).

4. ITEt:::JS FOR CONSIDERATION

4.a, Ad9.Rtion of a Resolution by: the CitY. Council apR.rQ.Ying a Relocation Plan;...eP-,Proval of a C00P-eration Agreement with the Garden Grove Housing Authoritv.,;..rul.QP-tlon of a Resolution by the Garden Grove Hous(ng Authorltv....2Pl2CIDlln.9 a Home Investment Partnershr12 Affordable Housing and Loan Agreement; gillj_gpproval by.-th.e Garden Grove Housing Authority_fg_[_gj_g.b.t...RJ:Qject based voucher R,g,yments for the implementation of permanent supportive housing located at 11742 Stuart Drive, Garden Grove. (Joint Action Item with the Garden Grove Housing Authority~).

4. b. A1wroval to R,atlk:ipate i□ the 2021-2022 Office of Traffic Safety_ .(OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Prog.@fil..(SIEE).._(.Gran.t Fundlng.l.._$.278,000)(Act/on Item).

5. MATTERS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND CITY

MANAGER

5.a. Graffiti Abatement UP-date as reguested by: the City Council,

6. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular City Council Meeting is Tuesday, September 28, 2021, at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, 92840.

Happy Birthday to Council Member Brietigam
https:f/ggcity.org/cgi-bin/city _council/view_ video _novus.cgi?ld=672 3/3 Agenda Item - 3.f.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Approval of Amendment No.
1 to an Agreement with
Civiltec Engineering, Inc. for
engineering and condition
assessment of Well Nos. 16,
19, and 25 (Cost: $70,330)
(Action Item)
Date: 5/24/2022

OBJECTIVE
To request City Council approval of Amendment No. 1 to an agreement with Civiltec Engineering Inc. (Civiltec) to provide engineering and condition assessment of Well Nos. 16, 19, and 25.

BACKGROUND
The City’s 2020 Water Master Plan has identified the need for three (3) of the potable water wells within the City to be rehabilitated. The preliminary recommendation includes reconditioning and modernization/automation of the wells. Prior to the commencement of the design for the rehabilitation of the wells, the City’s Water Services Division contracted with Civiltec to conduct an engineering and condition evaluation of each well to determine the remaining expected useful lifespan of the wells. As part of the contract, it included an optional scope for the design of rehabilitation of Well 19.

DISCUSSION
The City has proceeded with the optional scope to design the rehabilitation of Well 19, as the findings of the well assessment showed that Well 19 is in good condition.

To accommodate the addition of the per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) treatment at Well 19, additional improvements were identified. These improvements include the design of a new storm drain, modification to the existing Chlorine Chemical Treatment Dosing System, and the modification to the shading structure.

An amendment to the existing agreement is required to include fees for the additional design services, from $468,606 to $538,936, a $70,330 increase. The amendment will ensure Civiltec can provide the additional design services required for the Well

Page 134 of 376 ends

19 Rehabilitation Project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. This cost will be financed with Water Funds in the amount of $70,330.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve Amendment No. 1 to the existing agreement with Civiltec Engineering, Inc., increasing the existing agreement amount from $468,606 to $538,936, a $70,330 increase; and

Authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement on behalf of the City and make minor modifications as appropriate thereto.

By: Rebecca Li, Sr. Civil Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Amendment no. 1 5/9/2022 Agreement Contract_Amendment01_Proposal.pdf

Page 135 of 376 ends

•
•
-1-
AMENDMENT 1 TO
CIVILTEC ENGINEERING INC.

ENGINEERING AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF WELL NOS 16, 19, AND 25

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
between the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE and CIVILTEC ENGINEERING, INC., is made and entered into, to be effective the 24 day of May, 2022, as follows:

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the City of Garden Grove (“City”) has employed Civiltec Engineering Inc. (“Consultant”) to provide Engineering and Condition Assessment of Well Nos 16, 19, and 25; and

WHEREAS, the City has requested that Consultant to perform additional services identified in the attached proposal (engineering services to design a new drainage system and modification to the chlorine chemical dosing system and shade structure for Well 19); and

WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have agreed to the proposal and to increase compensation to cover the additional services.

AMENDMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein, the original Agreement compensation of $468,606.00 is hereby adjusted and the Scope of Work is hereby amended pursuant to Attachments 1 , incorporated herein by reference. Based on the amended Scope of Work, the total compensation amount of the Agreement is increased to a not to exceed amount of $538,936, which reflects an increase in compensation of $70,330.00 for Amendment 1 to cover the additional services to be provided by Consultant.

All provisions of the Agreement not affected herein shall remain in full force and effect.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

Page 136 of 376 ends

-2-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement for Engineering and Condition Assessment of Well Nos 16, 19, and 25 at Garden Grove, California.

CITY of GARDEN GROVE ATTEST:

By: By:

City Manager City Clerk

Approved as to form: Date:

City Attorney

Civiltec Engineering, Inc.

By: Date:

Its:

By:

Its:

Page 137 of 376 ends

Civil, Water, Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation and
Electrical/Controls Engineering ● Construction Management ● Surveying California ● Arizona

1440 N. Harbor Blvd., Suite 721, Fullerton, CA 92835 | P: 714.459.7957 | F: 714.459.7464 April 28, 2022

City of Garden Grove Sent Via Email: [email protected] 13802 Newhope Street
Garden Grove, California 92843

ATTN: Rebecca Li | Senior Civil Engineer

RE: Proposal for the Well 19 Storm Drain Connection
Civiltec Proposal No. PF22017.00

Dear Ms. Li,

Civiltec engineering, inc. (Civiltec) appreciates the opportunity to provide professional surveying and engineering services to the City of Garden Grove (Client) for the above referenced project. We understand this project is for the placement of a new pump to waste storm drain line for the Well 19 pumping system and proposed treatment plant in Garden Grove, California. The project will consist of placement of a new minimum 18” diameter RCP pipeline extending from the Well 19 site within Orangewood Avenue to the intersection of Orangewood and Euclid Street (approximately 1,400 feet in length). The new pipeline will connect with an existing City of Anaheim 72” storm drain pipeline.

Permitting coordination and acquisition with the City of Anaheim will be developed and considered in the ultimate alignment selection process. In addition, Civiltec will prepare design plans for a new chloring chemical dosing system within the Well 19 building enclosure. The existing chlorine storage tank will be kept in service. OCWD will prepare the design elements for the chlorine analyzer and its drainage to a future drain line connection to the storm drain. Civiltec will anticipate this component with necessary provisions in our plans. Lastly, a new shade structure will be designed to replace the existing chain link fence that is configured within the existing well 19 wall enclosure.

AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERS
Civiltec proposes to assign C. Shem Hawes, PE, as company representative. He is a Principal in the firm and the Fullerton Branch Manager. He will be responsible for the firm’s timely response and quality completion. He has complete authority to handle all contract ual matters, commit Civiltec’s resources as necessary and take all action necessary to meet your requests. Shem will be assisted by Alec Escamilla as the staff engineer. Civiltec will manage this project directly from our Fullerton office.

Page 138 of 376 ends

City of Garden Grove
Storm Drain Connection
April 28, 2022

Page 2 of 6 ends

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Based on our project understanding and professional experience, we have identified the following scope of services.

Phase 1 – Preliminary Design
Task 1 - Meeting and Project Management
Arrange and conduct a workshop with Garden Grove and Civiltec project team to formalize design criteria, discuss schedules, and obtain any data, CAD files, plans, or documents that Garden Grove may have in its possession relative to the project. In addition, meetings will be held during all major design milestones and as necessary to facilitate project execution. We have anticipated participating in 3 web-based team meetings to consider design elements and discussion. Meeting minutes and action items will be provided within 7 days of each meeting.

Task 2 - Utility Research and Data Collection
Civiltec will perform a complete utility investigation and data research of the site considering all major elements of the research necessary for design development. Our objective is to obtain all record information available for the site including record drawings of the site improvements, substructure drawings, boundary information, aerial photographs, vertical and horizontal control, preliminary engineering reports, record drawings, assessor’s parcel maps, etc. Civiltec will conduct a site visit to identify existing conditions that may affect design and construction of the proposed project.

Task 3 - Field Survey
Civiltec will perform a detailed field survey to locate existing features, obtain information on above- grade, on-site and off- site utilities and, if manho les are accessible, obtain invert elevations for the sewer and storm drain lines within street right-of-way. Water valves, utility vaults and other visible facilities will be documented using Underground Service Alert (USA) dig alert markings.

Task 4 - Base Mapping and Site Plan
Civiltec will plot the topographic information from the field survey in coordination with our field investigation and review public right -of-way maps, utility information obtained from research, and prepare the base map of the project areas, as necessary.

Task 5 – Concept Alignment and Analysis
Civiltec will prepare a concept alignment and pr epare technical memorandum establishing the benefits of the proposed pipe alignment considering cost, connection to City of Anaheim storm drain facilities, City of Anaheim permitting requirements and street resurfacing from the context of moratorium impacts. Results will be presented to confirm the proper approach moving forward.

Phase 2 – Design Services
Civiltec will prepare plans and specifications for civil, and all other aspects of the project based on direction from Garden Grove. The drawings will be created in AutoCAD 2019 for Windows in Civil3D on 24-inch by 36 -inch size sheets. Our design includes preparation of the plans for permitting purposes. Our efforts also include additional detailed electrical design for the Well 19 site.

Page 139 of 376 ends

City of Garden Grove
Storm Drain Connection
April 28, 2022

Page 3 of 6 ends

We propose to pr ov ide three submittals for approval of the plans and specifications. The following list identifies the key submittals, meetings, and design information proposed for the design.

Task 1 - 50% Design Submittal and Review
Submit complete design drawings, plans, and specification table of contents. The 50% design drawings will include topography map, location, and sizes of all found utilities, demolition plan and details. The 50% submittal will include title sheet, plan sheets, typical sections, and pipeline detail sheets.

We will meet with Garden Grove to discuss comments approximately one week following the 50% submittal.

Task 2 - 90% Design Submittal and Review
Civiltec will prepare detailed design plans for construction based on comments from the 50% design.

Civiltec’s 90% design submittal will include the piping layout and profiles, details, notes, dimensions, standard drawing references, connection details, and other pertinent information. Large-scale details will be provided for necessary tie-in connection points. Technical specifications, detailed engineer’s construction cost estimate, and bid schedule will be completed in accordance with Garden Grove’s requirements. The submittal will include complete designs and plans, first draft of complete specifications document, a narrative of progress addressing outstanding issues, and design completion.

We will meet with Garden Grove to discuss comments approximately one wee k following the 90% submittal.

Task 4 - Final Design Submittal
Civiltec will incorporate comments from the 90% design review corrections from Garden Grove. The final submittal will include original Mylar plans and original contract specifications signed by a California Professional Licensed Civil Engineer. A PDF set of plans will be submitted to Garden Grove for approval prior to final printing. We will also review Garden Grove ’s provided special provisions and update, as necessary. The front -end special provisions will be provided by Garden Grove to be included in the bid documents.

Task 5 – Specifications, Permits and Cost Estimate
Civiltec will prepare detailed technical specifications, permits, cost estimate, and special provisions to support the drawings and complete the elements of the project at each of the design milestones.

Garden Grove ’s technical specifications and standard drawings will be implemented where applicable. We understand that Garden Grove will furnish the specifications and Civiltec will refine these specifications to be project specific. We will also incorporate the latest Garden Grove front-end contract documents and general provisions and develop necessary project specific special provisions. We will apply for connection permits to the City of Anaheim public works department and consider directions made by Anaheim.

Phase 3 – Hydrogeologic Services
During the course of well inspection and investigation for Well 25 it was discovered that a joint in the existing casing required repair. Best Drilling and Pump will install a 10’ swage patch from 15’ to 25’

Page 140 of 376 ends

City of Garden Grove
Storm Drain Connection
April 28, 2022

Page 4 of 6 ends

below ground surface. This work will be performed prior to pump placement within the well by us e of a 16” diameter mild steel swage patch.

SCHEDULE
Civiltec is available to commence this project immediately. Based on the scope of work described previously, we can complete this project within 4 months of notice to proceed considering reasonable review times by permitting agencies.

FEE DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE
Professional fees for the above-described services will be billed on a time and materials, not to exceed basis as summarized below. A breakdown of our hours and fees is included as Attachment A.

Phase 1. Preliminary Design........................................................................................... $14,465.00 Phase 2. Design Services .................................................................................................. $32,020.00 Phase 3. Hydrogeologic Services .................................................................................. $23,845.00 Total ...................................................................................................................... $70,330.00

Any work not authorized within 3 months of the date of this proposal will be subject to renegotiations based on current rates. Capacity and impact fees associated with application filings shall be the responsibility of the Client. Additional services may be authorized by the Client based on Civiltec’s Hourly Rate Schedule. Civiltec will bill monthly for all work performed and expenses incurred on the project’s behalf.

If this proposal is acceptable, please return a signed copy to our office. Again, thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forward to working with you on this project. Please contact the undersigned directly with any comments or questions.

Sincerely,

Civiltec engineering, inc.

C. Shem Hawes, PE ([email protected]
)
Principal, Senior Engineer
CSH:AV

Page 141 of 376 ends

City of Garden Grove
Storm Drain Connection
April 28, 2022

Page 5 of 6 ends

Attachment(s): A – B reakdown of Hours and Fees

Proposal Acceptance:

The Terms and Conditions of this proposal are:

Accepted this day of 2022.

By Authorized Client Representative:

Rebecca Li | Senior Civil Engineer Date

W:\Proposals\2022 Proposals \Fullerton\PF22017.00-Garden Grove -Storm Drain Connection \Proposal\Drafts\DRAFT PF22017.00 - Garden Grove-Storm Drain Connection.docx

Page 142 of 376 ends

Attachment A
Breakdown of Hours and Fees

Page 143 of 376 ends

PF22017.00-Garden Grove-Storm Drain Connection
City of Garden Grove
Time and Fee Estimate
Date: April 28, 2022
HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY HOURS BY Best SrE SrPE SE D CADT PT Admin 2MS SM Drilling and Pump REIMB. TOTAL Scope of Work 240.00$ 205.00$ 155.00$ 145.00$ 110.00$ 120.00$ 80.00$ 240.00$ 185.00$ (x1.15) EXPENSES COST Phase 1 - Preliminary Design 14,465.00$
Task 1 - Meeting and Project Management 4 2 1 1 1,605.00$ Task 2 - Utility Research and Data Collection 1 8 1 2 750.00$ 2,400.00$ Task 3 - Field Survey 1 4 8 2,780.00$
Task 4 - Base Mapping and Site Plan 1 2 4 16 3,590.00$
Task 5 - Concept Alignment and Estimates 4 6 8 4 1 4,090.00$ Phase 2 - Design Services 32,020.00$
Task 1 - 50% Design Submittal and Review 5 8 14 24 2 8,650.00$ Task 2 - 90% Design Submittal and Review 6 14 20 32 2 12,210.00$ Task 3 - Final Design Submittal 2 6 10 14 2 5,450.00$
Task 4 - Specifications and Cost Estimate 3 6 16 8 4 5,710.00$ Phase 3 - Hydrogeologic Services 23,845.00$
Task 1 - Hydrogeologic Services 4 2 22,575.00$ 23,845.00$ HOURS 31 44 79 90 0 16 13 8 2 283
BUDGET 7,440.00$ 9,020.00$ 12, 245.00$ 13,050.00$ -$ 1, 920.00$ 1, 040.00$ 1, 920.00$ 370. 00$ 22, 575.00$ 750. 00$ 70, 330.00$ SR. PIC = Sr. Principal Engineer PIC = Principal Engineer SrE = Senior Engineer SrPM = Sr. Project Manager PrEE = Principal Electrical Engineer PM = Project Manager SrPE = Sr. Project Engineer PE = Project Engineer SrD = Sr. Designer SE = Staff Engineer D = Designer DD = Designer/Drafter
CADT = CAD Technician JrE = Junior Engineer PT = Planning Technician Admin = Administrative Assistant/Clerical CO = Resident Eng./Const. Observer 2MS = Two Person Survey Crew SM = Survey Manager SLS = Staff Land Surveyor
Prepared by CIVILTEC ENGINEERING 4/28/2022 Page 1

Page 144 of 376 ends

Agenda Item - 3.g.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Patricia Song
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Finance
Subject: Receive and file warrants.
(Action Item)
Date: 5/24/2022
Attached are the warrants recommended to be received and filed.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Warrants 5/19/2022 Warrants 04272022.pdf
Warrants 5/19/2022 Warrants 05012022.pdf
Warrants 5/19/2022 Warrants 05042022.pdf
Warrants 5/19/2022 Warrants 05112022.pdf

Page 145 of 376 ends

City of
Garden Grove
Certificate of Warrants
Register Dates:
4/27/2022

Fin
ance Director
Patricia Song

Note
: Checks 00678423 & 00678424 were over run.

This is to c ertify the demands covered by Wire numbers 0000103 1 through 00 001048, EFT numbers 00022412 through 00022438, and check numbers 00678355 through 00678453 inclusive as listed on this register and have been verified by the Fi nance Division as properly issued a nd bear all pr oper signatures.

Page 146 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 21, 2022 and Apr 28, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 16, 2022 5:05:26 PM Page 1
AP - Checking Account
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar
00001031 V00789 SO CALIF EDISON CO 04/28/2022 $7,359.37 00001032 V00789 SO CALIF EDISON CO 04/28/2022 $256.37 00001033 V00789 SO CALIF EDISON CO 04/28/2022 $2,467.09 00001034 V00792 SO CALIF GAS CO 04/27/2022 $106.13 00001035 V00792 SO CALIF GAS CO 04/27/2022 $24,763.59 00001036 V00686 FRONTIER COMMUNICATION 04/27/2022 $1,352.02 00001037 V02780 THE PITNEY BOWES BANK INC. RESERVE ACCOUNT 04/27/2022 $20,000.00 00001038 V02724 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREA 04/27/2022 $310,923.16 00001039 V01375 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 04/27/2022 $96,718.66 00001040 V02725 EMPOWER RETIREMENT, LL 04/27/2022 $115,044.44 00001041 V02152 EXPERT PAY CHILD SUPPO 04/27/2022 $1,691.06 00001042 V02091 MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT 04/27/2022 $343.38 00001043 V02724 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREA 04/27/2022 $305,061.04 00001044 V01375 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 04/27/2022 $93,762.72 00001045 V02725 EMPOWER RETIREMENT, LL 04/27/2022 $115,560.05 00001046 V02152 EXPERT PAY CHILD SUPPO 04/27/2022 $1,691.06 00001047 V02091 MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT 04/27/2022 $343.38 00001048 PC000062 UNION BANK PCARD AUTO PAYMENT 04/27/2022 $35,123.97 00022412 V00093 ABSOLUTE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 04/27/2022 $5,502.00 00022413 V02922 AMERICAN WATER COLLEGE, LLC 04/27/2022 $8,139.00 00022414 V00489 BAY ALARM COMPANY 04/27/2022 $691.50 00022415 V01345 BORDER TIRE 04/27/2022 $1,141.00 00022416 V01042 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO, INC 04/27/2022 $2,026.18 00022417 V01036 CITIBANK %CITIGROUP 04/27/2022 $5,949.23 00022418 V00672 CRON & ASSOCIATES TRANSCRIPTION, INC 04/27/2022 $4,339.84 00022419 V02754 E-PLAN, INC. 04/27/2022 $15,360.00 00022420 V00679 ENTERPRISE FLEET MGMT, INC 04/27/2022 $5,841.78 00022421 V00305 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS 04/27/2022 $102.00 00022422 V00218 GRAINGER 04/27/2022 $390.92 00022423 V02761 HASCO OIL COMPANY 04/27/2022 $963.17 00022424 V00716 INTERVAL HOUSE 04/27/2022 $110,712.54 00022425 V01286 JTB SUPPLY CO, INC 04/27/2022 $10,255.13 00022426 V02892 MEDIAMAX NETWORK LLC 04/27/2022 $10,000.00

Page 147 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 21, 2022 and Apr 28, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 16, 2022 5:05:26 PM Page 2
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022427 V00271 MONTROSE AIR QUALITY SERVICES, LLC 04/27/2022 $902.50 00022428 V02941 NAMY, INC. 04/27/2022 $6,250.00 00022429 V00082 NFINIT 04/27/2022 $933.63 00022430 V02205 OCAPICA 04/27/2022 $14,490.31 00022431 V02602 OMEGA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 04/27/2022 $906.21 00022432 V02768 PACIFIC PLUMBING COMPANY OF SANTA ANA 04/27/2022 $980.00 00022433 V00210 PEST OPTIONS, INC 04/27/2022 $1,442.25 00022434 V00425 PETDATA 04/27/2022 $4,533.10 00022435 V00250 SIMPSON CHEVROLET OF GG 04/27/2022 $1,446.49 00022436 V00817 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS, INC 04/27/2022 $2,269.01 00022437 V00520 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR CO 04/27/2022 $441.50 00022438 V01474 WEX BANK 04/27/2022 $2,420.32 00678355 OTV001906 MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC 04/25/2022 $14,480.25 00678356 V00573 ALAN'S LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER, INC 04/27/2022 $182.40 00678357 V00635 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC 04/27/2022 $6,711.00 00678358 V00895 ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY 04/27/2022 $1,000.00 00678359 V00639 ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY DEV 04/27/2022 $900.00 00678360 V00640 ANGELUS QUARRIES, INC 04/27/2022 $2,017.75 00678361 V00864 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC 04/27/2022 $1,360.00 00678362 V00145 AUTONATION FORD TUSTIN 04/27/2022 $2,982.43 00678363 V00179 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALIST 04/27/2022 $1,479.00 00678364 V01038 BRUCE HALL LAND SURVEYOR, INC 04/27/2022 $3,300.00 00678365 V01038 BRUCE HALL LAND SURVEYOR, INC 04/27/2022 $12,680.00 00678366 V01038 BRUCE HALL LAND SURVEYOR, INC 04/27/2022 $7,369.00 00678367 V01494 C G LANDSCAPE, INC 04/27/2022 $1,484.00 00678368 V00411 CALIFORNIA FUELS & LUBRICANTS 04/27/2022 $263,177.00 00678369 V01033 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 04/27/2022 $145.00 00678370 V01703 CARUS CORPORATION 04/27/2022 $629.46 00678371 V02433 CASHSTAR INC 04/27/2022 $4,116.00 00678372 H9009 CHANTECLAIR APTS 04/27/2022 $1,238.00 00678373 V00638 CITY OF ANAHEIM 04/27/2022 $483.33 00678374 V00579 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 04/27/2022 $99.00 00678375 V00667 CONTINENTAL CONCRETE CUTTING 04/27/2022 $1,057.00 00678376 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 04/27/2022 $6,840.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 148 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 21, 2022 and Apr 28, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 16, 2022 5:05:26 PM Page 3
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00678377 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 04/27/2022 $12,906.25 00678378 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 04/27/2022 $52,830.83 00678379 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 04/27/2022 $1,129.32 00678380 V00537 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 04/27/2022 $1,143.00 00678381 V01541 DISNEYLAND RESORT 04/27/2022 $9,443.00 00678382 V00233 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO BIN 139107 04/27/2022 $367.38 00678383 V02204 FAMILIES FORWARD, INC. 04/27/2022 $25,963.16 00678384 OTV001911 INC. FENCEWORKS RENTAL SYSTEMS 04/27/2022 $429.00 00678385 OTV001909 GISELLE FERNANDEZ 04/27/2022 $35.00 00678386 V02053 FIELDMAN,ROLAPP & ASSC., INC 04/27/2022 $3,050.00 00678387 V00658 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 04/27/2022 $390.60 00678388 V00054 GALLS LLC 04/27/2022 $2,115.45 00678389 V00690 GARDEN GROVE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 04/27/2022 $100.00 00678390 V00692 GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 04/27/2022 $1,567.82 00678391 V00698 GENERAL PUMP CO, INC 04/27/2022 $9,151.10 00678392 V02116 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC. 04/27/2022 $6,000.00 00678393 V00707 HACH COMPANY, INC 04/27/2022 $837.28 00678394 V00544 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS, LLC 04/27/2022 $24.70 00678395 V00711 HILL'S BROS LOCK & SAFE, INC 04/27/2022 $173.04 00678396 V00034 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 04/27/2022 $6,141.14 00678397 H00105 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LONG BEACH 04/27/2022 $14,792.15 00678398 H00105 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LONG BEACH 04/27/2022 $6,372.15 00678399 V01296 ICMA ICMA MEMBERSHIP PAYMENTS 04/27/2022 $3,000.00 00678400 V00135 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY, INC 04/27/2022 $1,053.30 00678401 V00182 INFOSEND, INC 04/27/2022 $1,095.89 00678402 V00531 IRV SEAVER MOTORCYCLES 04/27/2022 $1,305.69 00678403 V00717 J & M SERVICE, INC 04/27/2022 $803.34 00678404 V02865 JACOB GREEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 04/27/2022 $216.84 00678405 V01486 JAMES PRODUCTIONS, INC 04/27/2022 $2,122.70 00678406 V00038 JEANNE K DUNHAM LCSW 04/27/2022 $5,329.65 00678407 V00071 JM NURSERY 04/27/2022 $1,103.81 00678408 V00721 KELLY PAPER 04/27/2022 $527.99 00678409 V00726 KOA CORPORATION 04/27/2022 $4,000.00 00678410 V00220 LABSOURCE, INC 04/27/2022 $2,604.69 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 149 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 21, 2022 and Apr 28, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 16, 2022 5:05:26 PM Page 4
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00678411 OTV001907 TOMY LE 04/27/2022 $1,000.00 00678412 V00555 LIFECOM, INC 04/27/2022 $1,169.29 00678413 OTV001908 MARIA MARTINEZ 04/27/2022 $165.92 00678414 V00736 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 04/27/2022 $111.77 00678415 V01570 MEEDER PUBLIC FUNDS, INC 04/27/2022 $6,000.00 00678416 V00420 MIKE RAAHAUGES SHOOTING ENTERPRISES 04/27/2022 $105.24 00678417 V01218 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO, INC 04/27/2022 $688.76 00678418 V00541 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 04/27/2022 $334.75 00678419 V00557 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 04/27/2022 $403.43 00678420 V01080 NITV FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC 04/27/2022 $5,189.40 00678421 V00459 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 04/27/2022 $50.00 00678422 V00551 OC HOUSING AUTHORITY 04/27/2022 $11,625.00 00678425 V00371 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 04/27/2022 $6,380.66 00678426 V00756 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC 04/27/2022 $5,354.47 00678427 V00770 PROACTIVE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC 04/27/2022 $11,200.00 00678428 V00693 REPUBLIC SERVICES 676 04/27/2022 $86.54 00678429 V02771 CINTHIA B. ROSALES RAMIREZ 04/27/2022 $255.00 00678430 V00778 ROSEBURROUGH TOOL, INC 04/27/2022 $1,389.56 00678431 V00155 RPW SERVICES, INC 04/27/2022 $3,500.00 00678432 V00542 SCHORR METALS, INC 04/27/2022 $653.59 00678433 V00784 SHOETERIA 04/27/2022 $769.86 00678434 V00795 SPARKLETTS 04/27/2022 $193.29 00678435 V01119 STANDARD INSURANCE CO RAS EXECUTIVE BENEFITS 04/27/2022 $884.27 00678436 V00228 SUPERION, LLC 04/27/2022 $8,706.25 00678437 V01389 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 04/27/2022 $541.05 00678438 V01389 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 04/27/2022 $900.97 00678439 V00465 TIERRA WEST ADVISORS, INC 04/27/2022 $3,067.50 00678440 V00344 TIM HOGAN GRAPHICS 04/27/2022 $683.49 00678441 V00597 TOTAL COMPENSATION SYSTEMS, INC 04/27/2022 $3,915.00 00678442 V00806 TOXGUARD FLUID TECHNOLOGIES 04/27/2022 $352.17 00678443 V01623 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, INC 04/27/2022 $2,912.61 00678444 V01123 TRANSAMERICA EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04/27/2022 $7,459.60 00678445 V00815 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST, INC 04/27/2022 $63.07 00678446 V00152 UNITED WATER WORKS, INC 04/27/2022 $13,943.93 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 150 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 21, 2022 and Apr 28, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 16, 2022 5:05:26 PM Page 5
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00678447 V01201 US BANK 04/27/2022 $2,750.00 00678448 V00501 US BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN, CA 04/27/2022 $1,464.90 00678449 V00398 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY WESTERN DIVISION 04/27/2022 $1,135.92 00678450 V00527 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 04/27/2022 $2,603.39 00678451 V00824 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 04/27/2022 $1,342.53 00678452 V01636 WESTAMERICA COMMUNICATIONS 04/27/2022 $4,679.58 00678453 V00582 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, A PROFESSIONAL CORP
04/27/2022 $41,135.86
EFT: 27 $218,429.61
Check: 115 $1,799,593.00
Total: 142 $2,018,022.61
Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 151 of 376 ends

City of Garden Grove
Certificate of Warrants
5/01/2022

This is to certify the demands covered by EFT numbers 00022439 through 00023427, and c
heck numbers 00678454 through 00678665 inclusive as listed on this register and have been verified by the Fi nance Division as properly issued and bear all proper signatures.

Note:

Finance Director
Patricia Song

Page 152 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 1
AP - Checking Account
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022439 H00252 12111 BAILEY STREET LLC 05/01/2022 $1,294.00 00022440 H0951 12392 TO 12432 GROVEVIEW 05/01/2022 $764.00 00022441 H00286 12909 CORDARY LLC 05/01/2022 $2,545.00 00022442 H3409 12911 GALWAY ST, LLC 05/01/2022 $4,335.00 00022443 H3297 13251 NEWLAND, LLC 05/01/2022 $12,812.00 00022444 H4567 15915 LA FORGE ST WHITTIER, LLC 05/01/2022 $775.00 00022445 H3906 19822 BROOKHURST, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,537.00 00022446 H2617 2300 W EL SEGUNDO, LP DBA LOTUS GARDENS 05/01/2022 $9,854.00 00022447 H4149 2555 WEST WINSTON ROAD, LP PEBBLE COVE

APARTMENTS
05/01/2022 $1,489.00
00022448 H4791 606 SOUTH 6TH ST ASSOCIATES, LP 05/01/2022 $7,350.00 00022449 H2483 7632 21ST ST, LP 05/01/2022 $7,935.00 00022450 H2971 8080 BEVER PLACE-NEGBA, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,418.00 00022451 H4654 8572 STANFORD, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,378.00 00022452 H1044 ABCO CROWN VILLA,LTD 05/01/2022 $905.00 00022453 H3560 ACACIA VILLAGE 05/01/2022 $26,550.00 00022454 H9002 ACACIAN APTS 05/01/2022 $41,840.00 00022455 H00121 ADRIAN REALTY LLC 05/01/2022 $2,932.00 00022456 H4389 ADRIATIC APTS 05/01/2022 $1,081.00 00022457 H3401 AEGEAN APARTMENTS 05/01/2022 $7,455.00 00022458 H4741 PARVIZ ALAI 05/01/2022 $4,482.00 00022459 H00251 ALDERS APARTMENT COMPANY 05/01/2022 $1,815.00 00022460 H00033 ALEXANY NGUYEN PROPERTIES, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,442.00 00022461 H3512 ALFRED P VU & JULIE NGA HO, LLC 05/01/2022 $3,127.00 00022462 H1684 REHANA ALIBULLA 05/01/2022 $2,746.00 00022463 H4121 ALLARD APARTMENT, LLC 05/01/2022 $7,186.00 00022464 H3645 LYNN KATHLEEN ALLEN 05/01/2022 $1,263.00 00022465 H2454 ALTEZA,INC 05/01/2022 $1,870.00 00022466 H4668 AMCAL OCEANA FUND, LP OCEANA APARTMENTS 05/01/2022 $1,383.00 00022467 H2489 AMERICAN FAMILY HOUSING 05/01/2022 $6,814.00 00022468 H00093 SALMAN M AMIR 05/01/2022 $2,664.00 00022469 H2938 ANAHEIM SUNSET PLAZA APTS 05/01/2022 $7,177.00 00022470 H4371 CHUNG NAN AOU 05/01/2022 $1,744.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 153 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 2
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022471 H00181 AP TRUST DATED 01/20/21 05/01/2022 $1,114.00 00022472 H4254 ARBOR VILLAS, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,541.00 00022473 H00048 JESSIE WONG ARIAS 05/01/2022 $1,780.00 00022474 H4027 TIMOTEO ARJON 05/01/2022 $1,378.00 00022475 H4729 ARTESIA BOULEVARD 44, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,360.00 00022476 H3930 EIDA A ATTIA 05/01/2022 $1,794.00 00022477 H4272 PAUL AUDUONG 05/01/2022 $1,521.00 00022478 H4532 AUGUSTA GROUP INVESTMENTS INC 05/01/2022 $1,248.00 00022479 H00180 AVANATH FESTIVAL LP 05/01/2022 $2,626.00 00022480 H00084 AVANATH GROVE LP 05/01/2022 $43,884.00 00022481 H2062 AYNEM INVESTMENTS, LP 05/01/2022 $16,840.00 00022482 H00210 B2B INVESTMENTS LLC 05/01/2022 $1,718.00 00022483 H4505 BACH & JASON NGUYEN INVESTMENT LLC 05/01/2022 $1,771.00 00022484 H4295 BAKER RANCH AFFORDABLE, LP 05/01/2022 $1,745.00 00022485 H4403 HA BANH 05/01/2022 $1,600.00 00022486 H2370 BARRY SAYWITZ PROP TWO, LP 05/01/2022 $5,315.00 00022487 H4777 BDA INVESTMENTS, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,246.00 00022488 H00092 BEACH BOULEVARD COTTAGES LLC 05/01/2022 $414.00 00022489 H4797 BEACH CREEK PARTNERS II, LP 05/01/2022 $1,446.00 00022490 H4735 BEACHWOOD VILLAGE APARTMENTS 05/01/2022 $1,280.00 00022491 H4368 BEHRENS PROPERTIES, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,008.00 00022492 H3168 BELAGE PRESERVATION, LP 05/01/2022 $1,264.00 00022493 H4463 BERTINA PANG LOH CHANG 05/01/2022 $848.00 00022494 H3365 JAIME OR MAGALI BERTRAN 05/01/2022 $1,493.00 00022495 H3115 ANIL BHALANI 05/01/2022 $1,309.00 00022496 H0645 N C BHATT 05/01/2022 $4,652.00 00022497 H4746 BMN INVESTMENTS, INC 05/01/2022 $2,692.00 00022498 H00167 DAVID BORTHWICK 05/01/2022 $971.00 00022499 H3966 ADEL A BOUTROS 05/01/2022 $1,448.00 00022500 H4331 BOWEN PROPERTY, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,534.00 00022501 H0231 MAI BOZARJIAN 05/01/2022 $21,936.00 00022502 H4085 MAI BOZARJIAN 05/01/2022 $5,269.00 00022503 H4399 BRIAR CREST / ROSE CREST 05/01/2022 $3,251.00 00022504 H4784 BRIDGE WF CRYSTAL VIEW AGP, LLC 05/01/2022 $4,699.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 154 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 3
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022505 H0968 SHARON OR NORMAN BROWN 05/01/2022 $4,415.00 00022506 H4088 BACH BUI 05/01/2022 $1,066.00 00022507 H4656 DANIEL D BUI 05/01/2022 $2,600.00 00022508 H3590 DUNG BUI 05/01/2022 $931.00 00022509 H4699 KIMLOAN THI BUI 05/01/2022 $1,452.00 00022510 H4664 LONG BUI 05/01/2022 $1,185.00 00022511 H0276 MINH Q BUI 05/01/2022 $2,065.00 00022512 H3322 MONICA BUI 05/01/2022 $1,639.00 00022513 H1510 NGA HUYNH BUI 05/01/2022 $1,217.00 00022514 H4779 TAM BUI 05/01/2022 $1,555.00 00022515 H4760 THINH BUI 05/01/2022 $1,615.00 00022516 H4108 THUAN BUI 05/01/2022 $4,270.00 00022517 H4075 TRIET THO-MINH BUI 05/01/2022 $2,100.00 00022518 H3524 DAVID M BURLEY 05/01/2022 $1,636.00 00022519 H2916 THU T CAI-NGUYEN 05/01/2022 $570.00 00022520 H3272 CAMBRIDGE HEIGHTS, LP 05/01/2022 $1,256.00 00022521 H2159 HUONG B CAO 05/01/2022 $514.00 00022522 H4457 MYTRANG CAO 05/01/2022 $754.00 00022523 H2856 PHUOC GIA CAO 05/01/2022 $2,188.00 00022524 H00139 CASA CIENTO ASSOCIATES LP C/O ARNEL

MANAGEMENT CO
05/01/2022 $831.00
00022525 H4524 CASA MADRID 05/01/2022 $2,355.00 00022526 H4073 CASCADE TERRACE APARTMENTS 05/01/2022 $5,075.00 00022527 H4689 DAVID G CASCINO 05/01/2022 $2,374.00 00022528 H3904 KOU LEAN CHAN 05/01/2022 $1,109.00 00022529 H4135 CHIEN CHAN,MIN OR TRAN 05/01/2022 $5,763.00 00022530 H1229 EVELYN CHANG 05/01/2022 $3,056.00 00022531 H9008 SHERRI CHANG 05/01/2022 $2,016.00 00022532 H1368 CHARLESTON GARDENS, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,401.00 00022533 H1239 CHATHAM VILLAGE APTS 05/01/2022 $6,294.00 00022534 H3494 ALICE CHAU 05/01/2022 $2,439.00 00022535 H4714 KENNY CHAU 05/01/2022 $1,834.00 00022536 H3757 DENNIS KYINSAN CHEN 05/01/2022 $5,360.00 00022537 H1362 SHIAO-YUNG CHEN 05/01/2022 $6,583.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 155 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 4
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022538 H9010 T C CHEN 05/01/2022 $22,077.00 00022539 H3490 CHERRY WEST PROPERTIES 05/01/2022 $1,251.00 00022540 H1788 STEPHEN CHEUNG 05/01/2022 $1,573.00 00022541 H3094 PAUL M CHEY 05/01/2022 $2,700.00 00022542 H4707 NARITH CHHUM 05/01/2022 $1,845.00 00022543 H0317 LI-YONG CHIANG 05/01/2022 $1,372.00 00022544 H0159 DON J G CHONG 05/01/2022 $5,528.00 00022545 H1946 JOHN CHUN 05/01/2022 $1,220.00 00022546 H9011 KYU B CHUNG 05/01/2022 $5,620.00 00022547 H4444 CITRUS GROVE, LP 05/01/2022 $928.00 00022548 H00277 CITY OF COMPTON LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY 05/01/2022 $967.12 00022549 H00129 CLEARWATER INVESTMENTS 05/01/2022 $6,878.00 00022550 H3246 KATHLEEN P CLIFTON 05/01/2022 $1,363.00 00022551 H4785 CM 2080 NEW, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,283.00 00022552 H0776 PONCH CO 05/01/2022 $1,165.00 00022553 H3137 KATHY D COLACION 05/01/2022 $2,371.00 00022554 H4337 COMMUNITY GARDENS PARTNERS, LP 05/01/2022 $5,481.00 00022555 H3359 NORMA S CONCEPCION 05/01/2022 $1,420.00 00022556 H2193 CONCORD MGMT, LLC 05/01/2022 $894.00 00022557 H3752 CONNOR PINES, LLC 05/01/2022 $14,084.00 00022558 H0642 CONTINENTAL GARDENS APTS 05/01/2022 $13,780.00 00022559 H1134 CONTINENTAL GARDENS APTS 05/01/2022 $4,717.00 00022560 H00080 COUNTRY SQUIRE TUSTIN LLC 05/01/2022 $1,225.00 00022561 H0039 COURTYARD VILLAS 05/01/2022 $9,097.00 00022562 H4556 CST CAPITAL, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,480.00 00022563 H4686 CTC INVESTMENT GROUP, INC 05/01/2022 $1,251.00 00022564 H0017 KHANH CUNG 05/01/2022 $2,598.00 00022565 H3376 CURTIS FAMILY TRUST 05/01/2022 $1,295.00 00022566 H4659 D1 SENIOR IRVINE HOUSING PARTNERS, LP 05/01/2022 $1,727.00 00022567 H2985 NGHIA HO OR PHAN VE TU DAC 05/01/2022 $5,818.00 00022568 H4646 HUONG NGOC DAI 05/01/2022 $938.00 00022569 H00082 DAISY APARTMENT HOMES LLC 05/01/2022 $1,518.00 00022570 H2100 BINH DINH DAM 05/01/2022 $1,371.00 00022571 H3947 ANNIE DANG 05/01/2022 $1,924.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 156 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 5
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022572 H3369 CHINH VAN DANG 05/01/2022 $1,534.00 00022573 H4561 MIKE M DANG 05/01/2022 $2,299.00 00022574 H3065 DAVID DANG 05/01/2022 $1,578.00 00022575 H4598 THANH-THUY THI DANG 05/01/2022 $1,096.00 00022576 H1895 JOSEPH N DAO 05/01/2022 $1,409.00 00022577 H00157 MAI DAO 05/01/2022 $2,135.00 00022578 H00050 MICHELLE DAO 05/01/2022 $1,775.00 00022579 H1245 NELSON NGUYEN DAO 05/01/2022 $4,940.00 00022580 H1750 TRU DAO 05/01/2022 $4,686.00 00022581 H2184 TU VAN DAO 05/01/2022 $713.00 00022582 H9413 TU VAN DAO 05/01/2022 $2,246.00 00022583 H3021 NGOC-THUY DAO 05/01/2022 $1,574.00 00022584 H1802 LUONG-NGUYEN DAO-PHAM, LOC THI OR PHAM 05/01/2022 $2,592.00 00022585 H4239 RICHARD DAVIS 05/01/2022 $3,072.00 00022586 H4607 DE ANZA PLAZA APTS II 05/01/2022 $1,268.00 00022587 H4071 DEERING II FAMILY, LP 05/01/2022 $1,199.00 00022588 H3626 CLARA J DEWYER 05/01/2022 $911.00 00022589 H4583 HOI TUAN DIEP 05/01/2022 $1,313.00 00022590 H00067 BIEN T DINH 05/01/2022 $2,286.00 00022591 H4595 HAI DINH 05/01/2022 $1,377.00 00022592 H2147 HANH DINH 05/01/2022 $2,144.00 00022593 H4223 KATHLEEN DINH 05/01/2022 $1,750.00 00022594 H1479 KIM DINH 05/01/2022 $2,539.00 00022595 H4373 LAN THAI DINH 05/01/2022 $4,754.00 00022596 H3629 LONG T DINH 05/01/2022 $3,577.00 00022597 H4372 NHU Y DINH 05/01/2022 $1,249.00 00022598 H4406 THU V DINH 05/01/2022 $496.00 00022599 H4594 TUAN DINH 05/01/2022 $2,370.00 00022600 H4619 Y NHA DINH 05/01/2022 $3,890.00 00022601 H3284 DNK PROPERTY, LLC 05/01/2022 $16,006.00 00022602 H4498 BRANDON BINH DO 05/01/2022 $2,993.00 00022603 H4717 BYRON DO 05/01/2022 $2,255.00 00022604 H4718 DAITRANG DO 05/01/2022 $2,687.00 00022605 H4418 DOMINIC HAU DO 05/01/2022 $993.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 157 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 6
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022606 H00131 KEVIN HUNG DO 05/01/2022 $1,537.00 00022607 H1867 MINH C DO 05/01/2022 $4,065.00 00022608 H4450 MY-PHUONG DO 05/01/2022 $1,381.00 00022609 H1674 NANCY DO 05/01/2022 $1,380.00 00022610 H4802 NGA N DO 05/01/2022 $2,308.00 00022611 H00186 NOAN THI DO 05/01/2022 $2,214.00 00022612 H3593 THUY THI DO 05/01/2022 $1,387.00 00022613 H3181 TIM DO 05/01/2022 $1,135.00 00022614 H3671 TINA DO 05/01/2022 $1,429.00 00022615 H9016 TINA DO 05/01/2022 $4,243.00 00022616 H3732 XUYEN THI DO 05/01/2022 $1,242.00 00022617 H00137 CRYSTAL DOAN 05/01/2022 $1,276.00 00022618 H0580 HARRY DOAN 05/01/2022 $593.00 00022619 H4639 HIEP THI DOAN 05/01/2022 $2,659.00 00022620 H3609 HOAI T DOAN 05/01/2022 $1,620.00 00022621 H4808 HUEY G DOAN 05/01/2022 $3,910.00 00022622 H3999 HUY DOAN 05/01/2022 $1,388.00 00022623 H4289 HUY DOAN 05/01/2022 $744.00 00022624 H4420 KYLAM DOAN 05/01/2022 $1,803.00 00022625 H3980 NHA & JOANNE TRANG VU DOAN 05/01/2022 $1,670.00 00022626 H3855 PHUONGNGA THI DOAN 05/01/2022 $2,192.00 00022627 H4615 THANH QUE DOAN 05/01/2022 $1,620.00 00022628 H2424 JERRY DOIDGE 05/01/2022 $1,396.00 00022629 H3382 DOLCE VITA INVESTMENTS, LLC 05/01/2022 $6,002.00 00022630 H1744 MINH TRANG DONG 05/01/2022 $1,032.00 00022631 H2945 DORADO SENIOR APARTMENTS, LP 05/01/2022 $2,396.00 00022632 H4413 WILLIAM A DOWD III 05/01/2022 $1,152.00 00022633 H3228 DSN INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC 05/01/2022 $6,733.00 00022634 H3510 DTP INVESTMENTS, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,747.00 00022635 H4464 CHRISTINE H DU 05/01/2022 $1,243.00 00022636 H00061 DULILEON NINE LLC 05/01/2022 $1,125.00 00022637 H1385 DAVID C DUNN 05/01/2022 $2,492.00 00022638 H9021 DAVID F DUNNETT 05/01/2022 $1,375.00 00022639 H3866 HONG MANH DUONG 05/01/2022 $1,241.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 158 of 376 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates May 1, 2022
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on Apr 29, 2022 10:59:07 AM Page 7
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00022640 H00287 KAREN DUONG 05/01/2022 $2,151.00 00022641 H1885 MINH B DUONG 05/01/2022 $5,589.00 00022642 H3688 THAI VAN DUONG 05/01/2022 $1,480.00 00022643 H00081 TIFFANY DUONG 05/01/2022 $998.00 00022644 H3087 CHI THI DUONG 05/01/2022 $2,220.00 00022645 H2869 HUNG Q DUONG 05/01/2022 $1,240.00 00022646 H2781 GLADYS DYO 05/01/2022 $587.00 00022647 H00091 E-Z HOUSING GROUP LLC 05/01/2022 $1,614.00 00022648 H2422 EASTWIND PROPERTIES, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,895.00 00022649 H4770 EBL, LLC 05/01/2022 $5,651.00 00022650 H2036 DANIEL T EDLUND 05/01/2022 $1,596.00 00022651 H00220 KIM Y EHLE 05/01/2022 $1,089.00 00022652 H00233 EL NILE INVESTMENTS LLC 05/01/2022 $1,111.00 00022653 H4250 EL PUEBLO APTS 05/01/2022 $2,875.00 00022654 H4294 EL RAY PARTNERS, LLC 05/01/2022 $8,162.00 00022655 H4438 ELIAS CAPITAL GROUP, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,835.00 00022656 H00250 EMERALD RIDGE APARTMENTS 05/01/2022 $1,656.00 00022657 H4234 TERRY C ENGEL 05/01/2022 $1,575.00 00022658 H3299 EVERGREEN ESTATE EXPANSION, LLC 05/01/2022 $7,974.00 00022659 H00030 FAIRECREST REAL ESTATE, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,571.00 00022660 H1553 FAIRVIEW MGMT COMPANY 05/01/2022 $2,603.00 00022661 H5769 BOONE FAN 05/01/2022 $3,288.00 00022662 H3034 FBC APARTMENTS 05/01/2022 $780.00 00022663 H4757 FG GOLDENWEST SENIOR APTS, LP 05/01/2022 $18,717.00 00022664 H1702 FLOYD H FIELDS 05/01/2022 $1,268.00 00022665 H1689 WENDY FINCH 05/01/2022 $1,006.00 00022666 H00049 FIVE POINTS HOUSING LP 05/01/2022 $3,702.00 00022667 H3329 FOREVERGREEN EXPANSION, LLC 05/01/2022 $1,449.00 00022668 H00200 FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERS LP 05/01/2022 $1,502.00 00022669 H00051 FOUR SEASON 339 LLC 05/01/2022 $1,203.00 00022670 H7410 FRANCISCAN GARDENS APTS 05/01/2022 $28,322.00 00022671 H2569 WILLIAM FRECHTMAN 05/01/2022 $1,537.00 00022672 H4610 FREEDOMPATH PROPERTIES, LLC 05/01/2022 $2,650.00 00022673 H3691 FU CRAIG FA, LLC 05/01/2022 $4,913.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 159 of 376 ends

Garden Grove City CouncilMay 24, 2022

Garden Grove City Council
May 24, 2022