Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0527
1.6961
0.4580
4.5500e-
003
0.1140
3.1800e-
003
0.1171
0.0329
3.0400e-
003
0.0359
0.0000
441.9835
441.9835
0.0264
0.0000
442.6435
Worker
0.3051
0.2164
2.5233
7.3500e-
003
0.7557
6.2300e-
003
0.7619
0.2007
5.7400e-
003
0.2065
0.0000
663.9936
663.9936
0.0187
0.0000
664.4604
Total
0.3578
1.9125
2.9812
0.0119
0.8696
9.4100e-
003
0.8790
0.2336
8.7800e-
003
0.2424
0.0000
1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451
0.0000
1,107.103
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1321
293.1321
0.0702
0.0000
294.8877
Total
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1321
293.1321
0.0702
0.0000
294.8877
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0527
1.6961
0.4580
4.5500e-
003
0.1140
3.1800e-
003
0.1171
0.0329
3.0400e-
003
0.0359
0.0000
441.9835
441.9835
0.0264
0.0000
442.6435
Worker
0.3051
0.2164
2.5233
7.3500e-
003
0.7557
6.2300e-
003
0.7619
0.2007
5.7400e-
003
0.2065
0.0000
663.9936
663.9936
0.0187
0.0000
664.4604
Total
0.3578
1.9125
2.9812
0.0119
0.8696
9.4100e-
003
0.8790
0.2336
8.7800e-
003
0.2424
0.0000
1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451
0.0000
1,107.103
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2789
286.2789
0.0681
0.0000
287.9814
Total
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2789
286.2789
0.0681
0.0000
287.9814
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0382
1.2511
0.4011
4.3000e-
003
0.1113
1.4600e-
003
0.1127
0.0321
1.4000e-
003
0.0335
0.0000
417.9930
417.9930
0.0228
0.0000
418.5624
Worker
0.2795
0.1910
2.2635
6.9100e-
003
0.7377
5.9100e-
003
0.7436
0.1960
5.4500e-
003
0.2014
0.0000
624.5363
624.5363
0.0164
0.0000
624.9466
Total
0.3177
1.4420
2.6646
0.0112
0.8490
7.3700e-
003
0.8564
0.2281
6.8500e-
003
0.2349
0.0000
1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392
0.0000
1,043.509
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2785
286.2785
0.0681
0.0000
287.9811
Total
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2785
286.2785
0.0681
0.0000
287.9811
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0382
1.2511
0.4011
4.3000e-
003
0.1113
1.4600e-
003
0.1127
0.0321
1.4000e-
003
0.0335
0.0000
417.9930
417.9930
0.0228
0.0000
418.5624
Worker
0.2795
0.1910
2.2635
6.9100e-
003
0.7377
5.9100e-
003
0.7436
0.1960
5.4500e-
003
0.2014
0.0000
624.5363
624.5363
0.0164
0.0000
624.9466
Total
0.3177
1.4420
2.6646
0.0112
0.8490
7.3700e-
003
0.8564
0.2281
6.8500e-
003
0.2349
0.0000
1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392
0.0000
1,043.509
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Total
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Total
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 Unmitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
6 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
5 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e-
003
0.1141 9.5000e-
004
0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e-
004
0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e-
003
0.1369 1.1400e-
003
0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003
0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e-
003
0.1369 1.1400e-
003
0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003
0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003
1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003
0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Total 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003
1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003
0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003
1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003
0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Total 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003
1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003
0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e-
003
0.1369 1.1400e-
003
0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003
0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e-
003
0.1369 1.1400e-
003
0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003
0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e-
003
0.1521 1.2700e-
003
0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003
0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e-
003
0.1521 1.2700e-
003
0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003
0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e-
003
0.1521 1.2300e-
003
0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003
0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e-
003
0.1521 1.2300e-
003
0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003
0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e-
003
0.1141 9.0000e-
004
0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004
0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e-
003
0.1141 9.0000e-
004
0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004
0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e-
003
1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003
0.3315 1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264 1,062.041
0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e-
003
1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003
0.3315 1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264 1,062.041
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Unmitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003
0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003
0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616 2.7100e-
003
0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003
0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 120.77
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
Local Hire Provision Net Change
With Local Hire Provision
Without Local Hire Provision
Attachment C
EXHIBIT B
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist
Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48
Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting . Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006 . Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference . Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants . Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference .
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust .
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America . Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants.
Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.
Case 3:10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
EXHIBIT C
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887‐9013
Email: [email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
G
eologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.
Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.
Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003);
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
4 • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • C ontributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6 Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
7 Hagemann, M.F ., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F ., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009‐ 2011.
9 U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 304
Response to Commenter Letter No. 5
Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney at Law
June 20, 2022
5-1 The commenter notes the comments are being submitted on behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters (Southwest Carpenter or SWRCC) and provides a summary of the proposed Project. The comment does not provide any specific comments or statements regarding the environmental analysis or conclusions contained in the Draft IS/MND; no further response is necessary.
5-2 The comment requests the City to provide notice to the commenter of all notices referring or related to the Project.
The commenter’s request will be gr anted in accordance with the California Public Records Act (Government Code §§6250 -620); California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resource Code §21000 et seq); and Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code §§65000-65010), as cited in the letter. The comment does not provide any specific comments or statements regarding the environmental analysis or conclusions contained in the Draft IS/MND; no further response is necessary.
5-3 The comment states the City should require the use of local skilled an d trained workforce to benefit the community’s economic development and environment. The comment further notes the community benefits of local hire and skilled and trained workforce requirements, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, an d transportation impacts. The comment does not provide any specific comments or statements regarding the environmental analysis or conclusions contained in the Draft IS/MND. As demonstrated in Public Review Draft IS/MND Sections 4.3, Air Quality; 4.8, Gree nhouse Gas Emissions, and 4.17, Transportation, there are no significant short -term construction or long -term operational environmental impacts that are related to the length of vehicle trips or the proximity of workers to the Project site. There is no obligation under CEQA to consider implementation of skilled and trained workforce requirements, and no changes to the IS/MND are required. 5-4 The comment states the City should prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project and summarizes excerpts of the CEQA Guidelines and case law regarding preparation of an EIR.
The comment does not provide any specific comments or statements regarding the environmental analysis or conclusions contained in the Draft IS/MND that would warrant preparation of a n EIR. The comment references additional comments as substantiation for the need to prepare an EIR; refer to response to comments 2-6 through 2-11, below. 5-5 The comment states the MND requires substantial revisions and at a minimum, the City must revise and recirculate the IS/MND if it does not prepare an EIR for the Project. The comment does not provide any specific comments or statements regarding the enviro nmental analysis or conclusions contained in the Draft IS/MND that would warrant recirculation of the IS/MND or preparation of an EIR. The comment references additional comments as substantiation for the U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 305
need to recirculate the IS/MND or prepare an EIR; refer to response to comments 2-6 through 2- 11, below.
5-6 The comment states public health risks related to construction work requires a mandatory findings of significance under CEQA and specifically references the risk for COVID -19. The comment recommends the City adopt mitigation measures to mitigate public health risks related to COVID-19 during the Project’s construction activities.
The potential for Project construction to cause COVID -19 to spread through worker exposure is not an impact on the envir onment under CEQA, rather it is a public health concern under the purview of federal, state, and local public health agencies. CEQA requires the consideration of significant changes in the environment caused by a proposed project; therefore, an existing adverse environmental condition that a project does not create or exacerbate is not responsible for mitigating that adverse condition. Implementation of the proposed Project would not create or exacerbate an existing environmental hazard or an existing public health hazard, and therefore, no mitigation is required. Compliance with existing mandates from federal, state, and local public health agencies, including California Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (Cal/OSHA) COVID-19 Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS) are specifically intended to address workplace health and safety (OSHSB 2021). Policy mandates from public health agencies are consistently updated to address rapidly changing circumstances and provide the most appropriate and m ethods for protecting worker safety. Federal OSHA standards that apply to protecting workers from infection include: requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE) (29 CFR part 1910, Subpart I (e.g., 1910.132 and 133)), respiratory protection (29 CFR 1910.134), sanitation (29 CFR 1910.141), and OSHA's requirements for employee access to medical and exposure records (29 CFR 1910.1020). Employers are also required by the General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, to provide a safe and healthfu l workplace free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm (OSHA 2021).
Therefore, compliance with mandatory federal, state, and local public health agency regulations would ensure adequate and appropriate protections for workplace safety and the proposed Project would not create or exacerbate an existing environmental or public health hazard. There is no aspect of the proposed Project that would prevent or interfere with the United Brotherhood of Carpenters providing the Carpenter union members with additional trainings related to COVID-
19. No changes to the environmental analyses included in the Draft IS/MND are required. 5-7 The comment states the IS/MND omits information regarding biological resources imp acts specific to the removal of trees and potential for nesting birds. More specifically, the comment asserts the IS/MND states that providing replacement trees and landscaping will mitigate impacts on nesting birds.
Draft IS/MND Section 4.4, Biological Resources, addresses the removal of trees located within the parking lot along the northern Project boundary and includes mitigation measures to address the potential for nesting migratory birds that are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA).
The analysis notes that replacement trees and landscaping would be provided; however, it does not conclude that this replacement would mitigate potential impacts to nesting birds. The Draft IS/MND specifically includes Mitigation Measure BIO -1 to reduce po tential impacts to nesting birds. Mitigation Measure BIO -1 requires that if construction activities cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey shall be conducted to determine U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 306
the potential for nests and if active nests are found, a Nesting Bird Plan shall be prepared and implemented. The Nesting Bird Survey and Nesting Bird Plan would be required to be prepared by a qualified biologist. No changes to the environmental analyses included in the Draft IS/MND are required.
5-8 The comment references the Project’s parking spaces and that eight percent of the total parking spaces are identified for carpool and electric vehicles. The comment further references the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and the need for electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure to support growing EV usage and that EV infrastructure should be required. As discussed in Draft IS/MND Section 4.6, Energy, the Project would be required to comply with the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11), commonly referred to as CALGreen. The California Building Standards Commission developed CALGreen in an effort to meet the State’s landmark initiative Assembly Bill (AB) 32 goals, whi ch established a comprehensive program of cost -effective reductions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. CALGreen was developed to (1) reduce GHG emissions from buildings; (2) promote environmentally responsible, cost -effective, and he althier places to live and work; (3) reduce energy and water consumption; and (4) respond to the environmental directives of the administration. CALGreen requires that new buildings employ water efficiency and conservation, increase building system efficiencies (e.g. lighting, heating/ventilation and air conditioning [HVAC], and plumbing fixtures), divert construction waste from landfills, and incorporate electric vehicles charging infrastructure. As stated in the IS/MND, the Project would be required to co mply with the most recent version of CALGreen, which would include incorporation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. No changes to the environmental analyses included in the Draft IS/MND are required.
5-9 The comment references Draft IS/MND mitigation specific to potential impacts to paleontological resources, stating the mitigation does not provide the Program it plans to implement or identify particular fossil remain types and planned policies and procedures to be incorporated. Draft IS/MND Section 4.7, Geology and Soils provides a summary of the types of fossils that have been located within similar soils within the area. The Draft IS/MND identifies condition of approval (COA) GEO-1, which provides for Worker Awareness and Environmental Program (WEAP) training and identifies the requirements for the training, including identifying the potential fossils within the Project area and providing specific policies and procedures in the event of discovery.
Additionally, COA GEO -1 requires the developme nt of the WEAP be conducted by a qualified vertebrate paleontologist, as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology and that the WEAP be provided to the City. Further, COA GEO-2 provides the specific procedures in the event fossils or fossil beari ng deposits are encountered, including a professional vertebrate paleontologist evaluate the find and that documentation and treatment occur in accordance with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards and the significance of the find be evaluated pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines. Mitigation Measure GEO -1 further requires paleontological resources monitoring by a qualified vertebrate paleontologist be required during ground disturbances exceeding a specific depth and identifies the specific requirements for monitoring. 5-10 The comment states the IS/MND lacks sufficient information and analysis on land use consistency and that consistency with the General Plan goals and policies and regional plans are not adequately addressed. The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation (General Commercial with Mixed -Use Overlay) for the site. The Draft IS/MND U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 307
addresses consistency with General Plan and Municipal Code policies and regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mit igating an environmental effect throughout each environmental topical section. Additionally, the Project’s consistency with applicable regional plans, such as the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG) 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020 -2045 RTP/SCS), is addressed in several sections, including Draft IS/MND Section 4.3, Air Quality and Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions. As discussed in the Draft IS/MND, the Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. The 2020 -2045 RTP/SCS land use types and associated population, housing, and employment forecasts are based on local general plans as well as input from local governments, such as the City of Gardena. These same forecast s are incorporated into other regional plans, including the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The Project would be consistent with the growth forecasts considered within these plans. No changes to the environmental analyses included in the Draft IS/MND are required.
5-11 The comment references CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 and asserts the IS/MND’s project description does not satisfy the requirements as it provides no statement of objectives and it provides no description of the Project’s economic characteristics. CEQA Guidelines Section 15124, is within CEQA Guidelines Article 9. Contents of Environmental Impact Reports, Sections 15120 to 15132. Article 9, as referenced, is specific to Environmental Impact Reports. An IS/MND has been prepared for the pr oposed project; therefore, identification of project objectives and economic characteristics is not required. No changes to the project description or environmental analyses included in the Draft IS/MND are required.
5-12 The comment is a conclusionary s tatement requesting preparation of an EIR or at a minimum recirculation of the Draft IS/MND. The comment does not provide any additional comments or statements regarding the environmental analysis or conclusions contained in the Draft IS/MND that were not identified in previous comments and addressed above; no further response is necessary.
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 308
This page intentionally left blank.
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 17
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1: Construction, grubbing, brushing, or tree removal shall be conducted outside of the state identified nesting season for migratory birds (i.e., typically March 15 through September 1), if possible. If construction activities cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a Pre -Construction Nesting Bird Survey within and adjacent to the Project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three days prior to initiating construction activities. If active nests are found during the Pre -Construction Nesting Bird Survey, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and implemented during construction. At a minimum, the NBP
shall include guidelines for addressing active nests,
establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be based on the nesting species, nesting sage, nest location, its sensitivity to disturbance, and intensi ty and duration of the disturbance activity.
Pre-
Construction if
Not Outside of
the Nesting
Season/Prior to
Issuance of
Permits/During
Construction, if
Active Nests
Found
Pre-
Construction
Nesting Bird
Survey/Nesting
Bird Plan, if
Active Nests
Found
Applicant/
Contractor,
Biologist and
Community
Development
Director/ City
Building Official
CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-1: Prior to the beginning of ground disturbances, the Project proponent shall retain an archaeologist meeting Secretary of the Interior Standards (SOI) to oversee spotcheck cultural resources monitoring of all excavations two feet and deeper within the Projec t site. Spotchecks shall occur weekly on average, and no less often than once every seven days that ground disturbance occurs. If a cultural object is uncovered, the qualified monitor shall be empowered to temporarily redirect work away from the find whil e it is evaluated. Work Prior to Ground
Disturbing
Activities
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
Involving
Construction
Site Monitoring
& Completion
of Daily
Monitoring
Logs
Applicant/
Contractor,
Approved
Archaeologist,
and Community
Development
Director
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 18
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
can continue a minimum of 50 feet away from the find. For finds that are not significant, work may resume immediately after the find is documented and removed. If a find is
significant, a mitigation plan shall be developed, and
mitigation completed, prior to work continuing within the 50 - foot cordon.
Excavations Two
Feet and Deeper
Archaeological
Resource
Evaluation/
Development
and
Implementation
of Mitigation
Plan, if
Applicable
CUL-2: Prior to the beginning of ground disturbances, the qualified monitor shall give a Worker Environmental
Awareness Program training presentation prepared by the SOI qualified supervising archaeologist to all construction staff.
This presentation shall inform construction personnel what cultural resources may be uncovered during the ground - disturbing phases of the project and what to do who to in case of a find.
Prior to Ground
Disturbing
Activities
Verification of
Provision of
Worker
Environmental
Awareness
Program
Training
Applicant/
Contractor,
Approved
Archaeologist,
and Community
Development
Director
CUL-3: Refer also to Mitigation Measure TCR-3 (Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources ). Procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains on non -federal lands have been mandated by California Health and Safety Code §7050.5, PRC §5097.98 and the California Code of Regulations (CCR) §15064.5(e). According to the provisions in CE QA, should human remains be encountered, all work in the immediate vicinity of the burial shall cease, and any necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area must be taken. The Los Angeles County Coroner shall be immediately notified and must then determine whether the remains are Native
American. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner has 24 hours to notify the Native During
Construction
Evaluation of
Remains/
Notification of
NAHC, if
Applicable
Tribal Monitor,
Archaeologist,
and Community
Development
Director
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 19
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
American Heritage Commission (NAHC), who will in turn,
notify the person they identify as the Most-Likely-Descendent (MLD) of any human remains.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1: Paleontological resources monitoring by a qualified vertebrate paleontologist (as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology) shall be required during ground disturbances greater than 5.0 feet below the historic surface elevation in native sediments. Paleontological monitoring shall entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor shall have the authority to
temporarily divert the construction equi pment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected.
Monitoring efforts can be reduced or eliminated at the
discretion of the project paleontologist after 30 percent of earthwork is completed.
Prior to Ground
Disturbing
Activities
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
Paleontological
Monitor
Agreement
Construction
Site Monitoring
& Completion
of Daily
Monitoring
Logs
Community
Development
Director/City
Building Official,
Approved
Paleontologist
and Applicant/
Contractor
TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
TCR-1: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to
Commencement of Ground -Disturbing Activities . The Project Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the
commencement of any “ground -disturbing activity” for the subject Project at all Project locations (i.e., both on -site and any off -site locations that are included in the Project description/definition and/or required in connection with the Project, such as public improvement work). “Ground -
disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, Prior to Ground
Disturbing
Activities
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
During
Construction, if
Discovery of
Tribal Cultural
Monitor
Agreement
Construction
Site Monitoring
& Completion
of Daily
Monitoring
Logs
Community
Development
Director/City
Building Official,
Approved Tribal
Monitor and
Applicant/
Contractor
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 20
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.
A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be
submitted to the City prior to the earlier of the
commencement of any ground -disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground - disturbing activity.
The monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground -disturbing activities, the t ype of construction activities performed, locations of ground - disturbing activities, soil types, cultural - related materials, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs shall identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs shall be provided to the Project Applicant/City of Gardena upon written request to the Tribe.
On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a
designated point of contact for the Project Applicant that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the Project site or in
connection with the Project are complete; or (2) a
determination and written n otification by the Kizh to the Project Applicant that no future, planned construction activity Tribal Cultural
Resources
Occurs
Written
Confirmation of
No Additional
Monitoring
Completion of
Resource
Recovery, if
Applicable
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 21
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
and/or development/construction phase at the Project site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.
Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.
TCR-2: Refer also to Mitigation Measure CUL-3
Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects . Native American human remains are
defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness.
Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.
If Native American human remains and/or grave goods
discovered or recognized on the Project site, then all
construction activities shall immediately cease. Health and Safety Code Section 7 050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and all ground -disturbing activities shall immediately halt and shall remain halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remain s. If the coroner
recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native
During
Construction
Evaluation of
Remains/
Notification of
NAHC, if
Applicable
Tribal Monitor,
Archaeologist and
Community
Development
Director
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 22
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
American or has reason to believe they are Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission, and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed.
Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).
Construction activities may resume in other parts of the Project site at a minimum of 200 feet a way from discovered human remains and/or burial goods, if the monitor
determines in its sole discretion that resuming construction activities at that distance is acceptable and provides the project manager express consent of that determination (along with any other mitigation measures the Kizh monitor and/or archaeologist deems necessary). (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f).)
Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial goods.
Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.
TCR-3: Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains . As the Most Likely Descendant (“MLD”), the Koo -nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial, the burial of Upon Discovery
of Remains
Implementation
of Procedures
for Burials and
Funerary
Remains
Tribal Monitor/
Tribe,
Archaeologist,
and Community
Development
Director, and
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 23
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial
burning of human remains.
If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the discovery location shall be treated as a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.
The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.
Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all sacred materials.
In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains
shall be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation
opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard shall be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend
diverting the Project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the Project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed.
In the event preservation in place is not possible despite good faith efforts by the Project Applicant/developer and/or landowner, before ground -disturbing activities may resume NAHC, if
applicable
U-Haul Redevelopment Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final
June 2022 Page 24
Mitigation Measures Implementation
Timing
Monitoring/
Reporting
Methods
Responsible
for Approval/
Monitoring
Verification
Initials Date Remarks
on the Project site, the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the Project for th e respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects.
Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.
The Tribe will work closely with the Project’s qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated
carefully, ethicall y and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be prepared and shall include (at a minimum) detailed descriptive notes and sketches. All data recovery data recovery -related forms of documentation shall be approved in adv ance by the Tribe. If any data recovery is performed, once complete, a final report shall be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does not authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 11-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ZONE CHANGE OF A 4.2 ACRE PROPERTY FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C- 3) WITH A MIXED- USE OVERLAY (MUO) TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL (C-4) WITH A MUO AND A ZONE TEXT AMENDEMENT TO ALLOW
FOR GREATER GROUND FLOOR STREET FRONTAGE WHEN A PROPOSED SELF- STORAGE FACILITY IS SET BACK AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY; AND APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 185,573 SQUARE FOOT SELF- STORAGE AND RETAIL CENTER AT 14206 VAN NESS AVENUE
(EA #5-21, ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21)
(APNS: 4061028051, 023, 033)
THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. RECITALS.
A. AREC 11, LLC (AREC) is the owner of that real property of approximately
4.2 acres located at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Van Ness Avenue, consisting of three parcels (APN Nos. 4081- 028-023, -033, AND - 051) and commonly known as 14206 Van Ness Avenue, Gardena (the “Property).
B. The Property is currently developed with a U -Haul facility that is decades old.
C. AMERCO Real Estate Company, which provides real estate and development services to the U -Haul System (AMERCO and U- Haul are collectively referred to herein as “U -Haul”) filed applications for a zone change from General Commercial (C -3) to Heavy Commercial (C -4), a zone text amendment changing the development for self-storage facilities, a conditional use permit, and site plan in order to redevelop the existing U-Haul facility on the Property (collectively “the Project”).
D. An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project and the draft MND was circulated for a 20-day public review period between May 5, 2022, to May 24, 2022.
E. On June 21, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Gardena held a duly noticed public hearing on the draft IS/MND and the approvals required for the Project at which time it considered all evidence, both written and oral.
F. In making the various findings set forth herein, the Planning Commission has considered all of the evidence presented by staff, the applicant and the public, whether written or oral, and has considered the procedures and the standards required by the Gardena Municipal Code. The record of these proceedings can be found at the RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
Community Development Depar tment, Room 101, 1700 West 162 nd Street, Gardena, California. The Director of Community Development is the custodian of such record.
G. Prior to adopting this Resolution, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 10-22 approving the mitigated negative declaration and adopting the mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the conditional use permit and site plan review and recommending that the City Council do the same for the zone change and zone text amendment.
SECTION 2. ZONE CHANGE/ZONING CODE AMENDMENT.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit C changing the zoning from the Property from General Commercial (C-3) with a Mixed- Use Overlay (MU O) to Heavy Commercial (C -4) with a MUO. In making this recommendation the Planning Commission incorporates the findings set forth in Exhibit C.
SECTION 3. SITE PLAN REVIEW
Site Plan Review (#3-21) for the development of 185,573 square foot self-storage facility and retail center, based on the following findings and subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A, and project plans attached hereto as Exhibit B, as the same may be modified by the conditions of approval.
A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and general purpose of the general plan and provisions of the municipal code.
The General Plan Land Use Plan designates the Property as General Commercial and Mixed Use Overlay.
The General Commercial land use designation provides
for a wide range of larger scale commercial uses to serve both the needs of the City and the region. It is intended for commercial uses such as regional retail, automobile dealerships, supermarkets, junior department stores, financial centers, professional offices, restaurants, and other commercial uses oriented to the traveling public. The maximum permitte d floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.5 in general and up to 2.75 for specific uses when allowed by the Zoning Code. The Mixed-Use Overlay land use designation permits residential development on selected areas designated for Commercial and Industrial land uses. The purpose of this land use designation is to allow greater flexibility of development alternatives, especially attractive higher density residential development in appropriate areas that are experiencing both physical and economic blight.
The Project is consistent with various goals and policies of the General Plan including the following:
RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
Table 2 – General Plan Consistency
Table 2a – Land Use
LU Goal 2: Develop and preserve high quality commercial centers and clean industrial uses that benefit the City’s tax base, create jobs, and provide a full range of services to the residents and businesses.
LU Policy 2.1: Require ample landscaping
and high-level maintenance in all new
and existing commercial and industrial
developments.
The Project will include ample
landscaping provided throughout the site,
including ten-foot landscape planters
along the perimeters of the Property and
the street frontages along Rosecrans
Avenue and Van Ness Avenue.
LU Policy 2.1: Require ample landscaping
and high-level maintenance in all new
and existing commercial and industrial
developments.
The majority of the site is paved and has
minimal landscaping along the along the
southernmost portion of the eastern
Property boundary and interspersed
along the northern Property boundary.
The Project will introduce more
landscaping throughout the site,
exceeding the minimum requirements of
the City’s Zoning Code.
LU Policy 2.2: Encourage the assembly of
smaller commercial properties into larger
centers and discourage the subdivision of
larger commercial/industrial sites into
smaller parcels.
As conditioned, the Project will
consolidate three lots into a larger
commercial Property.
LU Goal 3: Provide high quality, attractive and well-maintained commercial, industrial, and public environments that enhance the image and vitality of the City.
LU Policy 3.2: Encourage the upgrade
and rehabilitation of existing commercial
and industrial building facades and sites.
The existing U-Haul facility has been in
operation since 1983 and has made
minimal improvements to the building
over the past several years. The Project
includes the redevelopment and upgrade
of the existing facility to provide quality
services to the City and surrounding
communities.
RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
Table 2b – Economic Development
Economic Development Goal 1 : Promote a growing and diverse business community that provides jobs, goods and services for the local and regional market, and maintains a sound tax base for the City.
ED Policy 1.5: Support regional -serving
commercial development at key focus
areas – Artesia Boulevard Corridor and the
areas around the three intersections along
Rosecrans Avenue at Van Ness, Western
and Normandie.
The Project includes maintain a local
business that provides jobs and services
and maintains the City tax base.
The existing facility is located at the
northeast corner of Van Ness Avenue and
Rosecrans Avenue. The U -Haul moving
and self -storage facility will not only
service the City of Gardena but expand its
services to the surrounding South Bay
region.
Economic Development Goal 2: Expand, retain, and revitalize quality businesses.
ED Policy 2.1: Encourage the
assemblage of small commercial parcels
to accommodate quality commercial
development.
As conditioned, the Project will
consolidate three lots into a larger
commercial Property to develop a new,
modern U-Haul Moving and Storage
facility.
Table 2c – Community Design
DS Goal 4: Achieve high quality design for commercial uses.
DS 4.1: Promote a strong relationship
between buildings and the street.
All new buildings will be setback a
minimum 10-feet from the public rights-of-
way and include various trees and
shrubbery.
DS 4.2: Provide functional pedestrian
connections between adjacent
commercial uses.
As a condition of approval, the applicant
will be required to replace the sidewalk in
front of the Project site.
DS 4.8: Require loading areas, access
and circulation driveways, trash and
storage areas, and rooftop equipment to
All the loading areas, access and
circulation driveways, trash and storage
areas, and rooftop equipment to be
RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
be concealed from view and located as
far as possible from adjacent residences.
concealed from view and located as far
as possible from adjacent residences.
Therefore, for reasons stated above, and based upon the evidence included in the Staff Report, which is incorporated by reference, the Project is consistent with the intent and general purpose of the General Plan and the Gardena Municipal Code.
B. The proposed project will not adversely affect the orderly and harmonious development of the area and the general welfare of the city.
As set forth above and in the staff report, which is incorporated by reference, the site plan meets all of the development requirements and the proposal, as conditioned, will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, the surrounding land uses.
SECTION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
Conditional Use Permit ( #1-21) for the use of a self -storage facility on the Property , is hereby approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A.
A. That the use if one for which a conditional use permit is authorized; In accordance with GMC Section 18.34.030.X, self -storage facilities are permitted in the C -4 pursuant to an approved conditional use permit. Therefore, subject to the approval Zone Change #1- 21, the application for a conditional use permit is deemed proper and will allow the self -storage facility to continue to operate at the subject location.
B. That such use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community and is compatible with the surrounding uses; is in harmony with the general plan; is not detrimental to the surrounding properties, existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare; The facility is an existing self-storage facility that has been operating since 1983. The site is bounded by Van Ness Avenue to the west, Rosecrans Avenue to the south, a United States Postal Office to the north and residential townhomes to the east. T he redeveloped self-storage facility and truck rental facility would have minimal impacts on the surrounding neighborhood.
All storage units would have interior access only and
all parking of the business vehicles will be kept in the “shunting area” located in the covered first level of the facility , except for those rental vehicles located in the designated display stalls along Van Ness Avenue.
The existing eight-foot-high masonry wall along the eastern property line, abutting the RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
residential townhomes, will remain and a new 10- foot landscape planter with will be installed.
C. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use and all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping and other features required in order to adjust such use to those existing or permitted future uses on land in the neighborhood;
The Property has a dimension of 290 feet by 610 feet. As shown in the staff report, which is incorporated by reference, the Project meets or exceeds all the minimum development standards of the C -4 zone, including setbacks, walls, fencing, landscaping, and parking if the amendment to the C-4 zone text is approved.
D. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use;
Vehicular access to the site is provided off Van Ness Avenue via three drive aisles and one from Rosecrans Avenue. The Circulation Plan of the Gardena General Plan designates Rosecrans Avenue as an arterial roadway and Van Ness Avenue as a major collector roadway.
In accordance with the Circulation Plan of the General Plan major collector streets, such as Van Ness Avenue, are designed to carry approximately 15,000 to 25,000 vehicles a day. According to the most recent traffic counts from the City’s Public Works Department, Van Ness Avenue currently carries no more than 20,600 vehicles per day in the subject area. The Project is expected to generate 380 weekday daily vehicle trips. When taking a credit for the existing site uses, the Project is expected to generate 120 net new daily vehicle trips. The addition of 120 daily trips are well within the capacity of Van Ness Avenue.
The Circulation Plan states Rosecrans Avenue, an arterial street, is designed to carry approximately 40,000 to 60,000 vehicles a day. The City’s traffic counts show the subject area is currently carrying 31,800, and again the Project is expected to generate 120 net new daily vehicle trips. Therefore, the surrounding streets are properly designed to carry the quantity of traffic generated by the Project.
E. That the conditions stated in the decisions are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
The conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit #1- 21, will ensure that the self- storage facility will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, the surrounding uses in the vicinity.
RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
SECTION 4. APPEAL.
The approvals granted by this Resolution may be appealed within 10 calendar days from adoption of this resolution. All appeals must be in writing and f iled with the City Clerk within this time period with the appropriate fee. Failure to file a timely written appeal will constitute a waiver of any right of appeal. The City Council may also call this matter for review within the same time period.
SECTION 5. RECORD.
Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the Project. All summaries of information in the findings which precede this section are based on the entire record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.
SECTION 6. CUSTODIAN OF RECORD.
The Custodian of R ecord for the proceedings relating to the Project is Greg Tsujiuchi, Community Development Director, City of Gardena, 1700 West 162 nd Street, Gardena, California 90247. Mr. Tsujiuchi’s email is [email protected] and his phone number is (310) 217-9530.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Resolution shall take effect immediately ; the approvals shall only take effect fi the City Council approves the zone change and zone text amendment and those approvals become effective.
SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION.
The Secretary shall certify the passage of this resolution.
SECTION 9. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION.
Staff shall file a Notice of Determination within 5 working days of this approval.
RESO NO. PC 11-22
ZTA #2-21, ZC #1-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2022.
LANGLEY STEPHEN, CHAIR
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY COMMISSION
ATTEST:
___________________________________
GREG TSUJIUCHI, SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF GARDENA
I, Greg Tsujiuchi, Planning and Environmental Quality Commission Secretary of the City of Gardena, do hereby certify the following:
1. That a copy of this Resolution and attachments will be sent to the applicant and to the City Council as a report of the findings and action of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission; and
2. That the foregoi ng Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission of the City of Gardena at a regular meeting thereof, held the 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission:
AYES: n, Sherman, Pierce, Jackson, Pierce
NOES:
ABSENT:
Attachments:
• Exhibit A – Conditions of Approval
• Exhibit B – Project Plans
• Exhibit C – Draft Ordinance approving the Zone Change and Zoning Code • Exhibit D – Zone Change #1-21 Map
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF GARDENA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #5-21, SITE PLAN REVIEW #3-21 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #1-21
GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC 1. The applicant accepts all of the conditions of approval set forth in this document and shall sign the acknowledgement. A copy of the signed document shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of any construction permit.
GC 2. Development of this site shall comply with the requirements and regulations of Title 15 (Building and Construction) and Title 18 (Zoning) of the Gardena Municipal Code.
GC 3. The applicant shall comply with all written policies, resolutions, ordinances, and all applicable laws in effect at time of approval. The conditions of approval shall supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, and dimensions which may be shown on the project development plans.
GC 4. The floor plan layout shall be in accordance with the pl ans approved by the Commission and modified by these conditions of approval. The final completed project shall be in substantial compliance with the plans upon which the Commission based its decision, as modified by such decision.
GC 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, actions or proceedings, damages, costs (including without limitation attorneys’ fees), injuries, or liabilities against the City or its agents, office rs, or employees arising out of the City’s approval of Environmental Assessment #5- 21, Zone Change #1- 21, Zone Text Amendment #2-21, Site Plan Review #3- 21, and Conditional Use Permit #1-
21. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Although the applicant is the real party in interest in action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any action with the attorneys of its own choosing, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of any obligation under this condition, including the payment of attorneys’ fees.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
SPR1. Site Plan Review # 3-21 shall be utilized within a period not to exceed twelve (12) months from the date of approval , unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 18.44.060 of the Gardena Municipal Code. Utilization EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
shall mean the issuance of building permits. The twelve months shall not begin to commence until the legislative approvals become effective.
CO
NDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CUP1. Conditional Use Permit #1- 21 shall be utilized within a period not to exceed twelve (12) months from the date of approval, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 18.46.040 of the Gardena Municipal Code.
Utilization shall mean the issuance of a business license. The twelve months shall not begin to commence until the legislative approvals become effective.
CUP2. All pr oposed wall signs shall be subject to submittal and review for a sign permit with the Community Development Department. All proposed signs shall comply with the provision of the Gardena Municipal Code Chapter 18.58.
CUP3. All fences or walls visible from the public right -of-way shall be constructed of decorative building materials such as slump stone masonry, concrete block, wrought iron, or other similar materials.
CUP4. All storage of boats, campers, recreations vehicles, travel trailer, and other similar large items on the site
shall not be visible from the public right -of-way
or adjacent properties.
CUP5. The applicant shall prohibit any on-site residential manager unit.
P
LANNING
PL1.
PL2.
PL3.
PL4.
The applicant shall be required to apply for a lot line adjustment to combine the three lots into one.
The applicant shall submit a site lighting plan, with photometrics, for review and approval to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. The plan shall ensure that all exterior lighting (i.e., parking areas, building areas, and entries) shall employ illumination in a manner that meets the approval of the Building Official and the Director of Community Development or designee before building permits are issued. All light fixtures shall be designed and located in a manner that does not allow spillover onto adjacent properties.
No more than five rental vehicles s hall be on display at any time. Vehicles for display shall be located in the des ignated areas as shown in the plans approved by the Planning Commission, along Van Ness Avenue.
Price advertisements signage shall n ot be placed in the windows or on any vehicles on display.
BUI
LDING & SAFETY
BS1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable portions of the California Building EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) in effect at the time of permit application.
BS2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions set forth by other departments and agencies, including but not limited to: Gardena Planning, Gardena Public Works, and Los Angeles County Fire Department.
BS3. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Los Angeles County Fire Code and Fire Department requirements, as applicable.
BS4. All structures shall have fire protection via a sprinkler system under a NFPA 13R system.
BS5. The applicant shall demonstrate that coverages has been obtained under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control B oard and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing shall be provided to the Chief Building Official and the City Engineer. Projects subject to this requirement shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review on request. Best Management Practices shall be used during construction to prevent construction materials and soil from entering the storm drain.
BS6. The applicant shall submit a Final Priority WQMP to the Building Division for review and approval. This plan shall be in conformance with all current NPDES requirements. The WQMP must implement Low Impact Developmen t (LID) principles such that projects infiltrate, harvest, re-use, evaporation, or bio-treat storm water runoff. Sheet flowing storm -water, without filtering, is no longer acceptable.
BS7. Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified building inspector to determine the presence or absence of asbestos containing- materials (ACMs).
The sampling method to be us ed shall be based on the statistical probability that construction materials similar in color and texture contain similar amounts of asbestos. In areas where the material appears to be homogeneous in color and texture over a wide area, bulk samples shall be collected at discrete locations from within these areas. In unique or nonhomogeneous areas, discrete samples of potential ACMs shall be collected. The survey shall identify the likelihood that asbestos is present in concentrations greater than 1 percent in construction materials. If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard.
Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Common asbestos abatement techniques involve EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
removal, encapsulation, or enclosure. The removal of asbestos is preferred when the material is in poor physical condition and there is sufficient space for the removal technique. The encapsulation of asbestos is preferred when the material has sufficient resistance to ripping, has a hard or sealed surface, or is difficult to reach. The enclosure of asbestos is to be applied when the material is in perfect physical condition, or if the material cannot be removed from the site for reasons of protection against fire, heat, or noise.
BS8. If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional. A portable, field X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer shall be used to identify the locations of potential lead paint, and test accessible painted surfaces. The qualified Environmental Professional shall identify the likelihood that lead is present in concentrations greater than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) in/on readily accessible painted surfaces of the buildings.
If lead-based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust or fume hazard.
Potential methods to reduce lead dust and waste during removal include wet scraping, wet planning, use of electric heat guns, chemical stripping, and use of local High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) exhaust systems. Lead- based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1 532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead-based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the City Engineer.
BS9. The applicant shall provide a complete hydrology and hydraulic study prepared by a qualified engineer, and comply with the recommendations of the engineer, to the satisfaction of the Building Official.
BS10. The applicant shall submit a Final Geotechnical Investigation for City review/approval and comply with its recommendations and any revisions deemed necessary by the City’s Building Official. The Gardena Building Services Division will review construction plans to verify compliance with standard engineering practices, the GMC/CBSC, and the Geotechnical Investigation’s recommendations.
BS11. The applicant shall prepare construction and demolition waste recycling plans for review and approval by the Building Division. The a pplicant shall enroll in the city’s waste diversion program.
PUBLIC WORKS – ENGINEERING DIVISION
PW1. All work in the public right of way shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Plans and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, latest edition. This includes supplements thereto and City of Gardena Standard Drawings.
EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
PW2. Before undertaking any Encroachment/Excavation within the public right of way, the owner must first obtain the applicable permit from the Public Works Engineering Division.
PW3. The project shall utilize the County’s benchmarks and any controlling survey monumentation (property lines, tract lines, street centerline, etc.) which are at risk of being destroyed or disturbed during the course of the project must be preserved in accordance with Section 8771(b) of the California Business and Professions Code (Professional Land Surveyors Act). Preconstruction field ties, along with the preparation and filling of the required Corner Records or Record of Survey with the County of Los Angeles, shall be accomplished by, or under the direction of, a licensed surveyor or civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying.
Copies of said records shall be furnished to the City Engineering for review and approval prior to issuance of any onsite or offsite construction permit. In addition, any monuments disturbed or destroyed by this project must be reset and post ‐ construction Corner Records or Record of Survey filed with the County of Los Angeles. A copy of the recorded documents shall be submitted to the Engineering office for review and approval prior to issuance and/or finalizing any permits within the public right of way.
PW4. Prior to issuance of permits, all public improvements (if any) shall be guaranteed to be installed by the execution of an Agreement for Public Improvements secured by sufficient bond sureties or cash, complete indemnification form, Certification of Insurance (General Liability, Auto & Workers Compensation) naming City of Gardena as additional insured, contractor State License and City Business License.
PW5. All public im provements, studies, designs, plans, calculations and other requirements shall be installed, provided and supplied by the developer in accordance with City and State codes, policies and requirements at no cost to the City.
All work shall comply with City Standards and specifications and with the City of Gardena Municipal Codes and to be designed and signed by a registered Civil Engineer or other applicable professional license engineer(s).
PW6. The applicant shall remove and replace all sidewalk, curb, gutter, c urb ramp, and driveway fronting property . All incidental improvements such as traffic markings, re‐painting existing curbs, traffic signs, curb drains, etc. shall also be included.
PW7. The applicant shall remove and replace streetlights with concrete/marbleli te poles. All incidental improvements such as traffic markings, re‐painting existing curbs, curb drains, etc. shall also be included.
PW8. The applicant shall provide a ten -foot-wide roadway easement along the western property line of the south west corner property that abuts Van Ness Avenue (APN: 4061-028-023).
EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
PW9. The applicant shall provide traffic control plans per WATCH (Work Area Traffic Control Handbook) and/or California MUTCD (California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices) per the latest standard pending proposed controls (permanent‐overnight or temporary). The temporary/permanent traffic control plans shall be prepared by, or under the direction of, a licensed civil engineer or other authorized to practice traffic engineering.
PW10. The applicant shall submit as-built plan signed and stamped by the Engineer of Record shall be submitted to Public Works Department prior to finalizing and closing permit.
PW11. The applicant shall provide Street Improvement Plans showing all requirements and submit to Public Works Department for review and approval. Street Improvement Plan shall be stamped and signed by a Civil Engineer Registered in the state of California. An As ‐built plan signed and stamped by the Engineer of Record shall be submitted to Public Works Department prior to finalizing and closing permit. Any deviations from the approved plan will require a submittal of plan revision for the City review and approval.
PW12. The applicant is responsible for all applicable permit, plan check surety, sewer fees, and other incidental fees pertaining to the proposed project.
STANDARD CONDITIONS TO REDUCE IMPACTS
EN1. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures set forth in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
EN2. Prior to commencement of ground- disturbing activities, a qualified vertebrate paleontologist (as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology) shall develop Worker Awareness and Environmental Program (WEAP) Training for construction personnel. This training shall be presented to construction personnel and include what fossil remains may be found within the Project area and policies and procedures that must be followed in case of a discovery.
Verification of the WEAP Training shall be provided to the Gardena Community Development Department.
EN3. If fossils or fossil bearing deposits are encountered during ground- disturbing activities, work within a 25-foot radius of the find shall halt and a professional vertebrate paleontologist (as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology) shall be contacted immediately t o evaluate the find. The paleontologist shall have the authority to stop or divert construction, as necessary. Documentation and treatment of the discovery shall occur in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
significance of the find shall be evaluated pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines. If the discovery proves to be significant, before construction activities resume at the location of the find, additional work such as data recovery excavation may be warranted, as deemed neces sary by the paleontologist and full -time paleontological monitoring shall occur for the remainder of ground disturbance for the project.
EN4. Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of demolition, grading, and building permits, the following noise reduction techniques shall be included in the construction plans or specifications:
a. Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices.
b. The Project Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City’s Building Official that construction noise reduction methods shall be used where feasible, including shutting off idling equipment. c. During construction, equipment staging areas shall be located such that the greatest distance is between the staging area noise sources and noise- sensitive receptors.
d. Per Gardena Municipal Code Section 8.36.080, construction activities shall not occur during the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays; between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on Saturday; or any time on Sunday or a Federal holiday.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
FD1. The applicant shall submit plans and specifications to the County of Los Angeles Fire Department Fire Prevention Engineering Section Building Plan Check Unit for review prior to building permit issuance.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
SD1. The applicant shall pay a connection fee before a permit to connect to the sewer is issued. For more specific information regarding the connection fee application procedure and fees, please contact the Connection Fee Counter at (562) 908- 4288, extension 2727.
EA #5-21, SPR #3-21, CUP #1-21
June 21, 2022
AMERCO Real Estate Company, certifies that it has read, understood, and agrees to the Project Conditions listed herein.
____________________________________________
AMERCO Real Estate Company, Representative
By______________________________________
Dated__________________________________
ADARR RE-USEAREA
MOP/COMMRM
PROPOSED30' ACCESS
24"-36"SCREENWALL
24"-36"SCREENWALL
24"-36"SCREENWALL
24"-36"SCREENWALL
PROPOSEDBLDG. "A"RETAIL/OFFICE ±8,000 SF
PROPOSEDSTORAGEBLDG. "B" ±53,764 SF FOOTPRINT(5 STORY ±177,573 GSF)
GROUND FLOORSHUNTING AREA
5 x 5
10 x 15TOTAL
PROPOSED MIX
10 x 10
5 x 10 %
%%
%
%7,075628335,100317021st Flr33%
%%
%
SQ. FT.%%8258
100
442,20021
606,00056101,5001414910,675
10 x 8 %56017%1801
NON CLIMATE - 32%LOCKERSIZE
7 x 8 %22404%0007 x 10 %49017%1700
2nd Flr55%SQ. FT.%%1,37561597,95032
11211,200253,75035925,217
%21601%21120%1700
3rd Flr65%SQ. FT.%%1,62561688,40033
%1800%000%21401
4th Flr65%SQ. FT.%%1,62561648,20033
%21601
CLIMATE - 68%
%21120%1700
5th FlrSQ. FT.% QTYSQ. FT.%TOTAL65%%1,62561678,35033
%1800%000%21401
10 x 20 %%0003 100
49,5004449516,50015110111,8491,620%%
%
100
4415 %%
%
100
10810,80043253,7501537225,395%%
%
100
10710,70043253,7501536925,217%%
%
100
10810,80043253,7501537125,3452,400212%6002 %36002 %36002 %36002 %
%%
%
%4,875619524,95033499
%32004 %11202 %35015
QTYSQ. FT.%CLIMATE TOTAL
%100
32,3004332311,250157575,9571,1121,80029
%
%%
%
%2,20068810,15028203
%24013 %11202 %14002
QTYSQ. FT.%NON-CLIMATE TOTAL
%100
17,200481725,250153535,89250860023
SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
SITE AERIAL
SCALE: N.T.S.Zoning InformationProject Name:U-Haul Moving & Storage of GardenaMunicipality:City of Gardena, CAProject Address: 14206 S Van Ness Ave, Gardena CA 90249APN /Acre / Area: 4061028051 / 4.2±AC / 182,952± s.f.Current Zone: C-3/MUOProposed Zoning: C-4/MUOAdjacent Zoning:North - M-2South- C-3/P/MUOEast- C-3/MUOWest- C-3 & C-2/P/MUOProposed Uses: Self-Storage, Retail, Truck Share/Vehicle storageSetbacks:Front yard: 10 ft at streetSide yard: 10 ft at streetRear yard: 10 ft at streetFAR:Required: 2.75Proposed: 1.01(177,573±sf+8,000 ±sf=185,573 ±sf/182,952 ±sf)Height Limit:Required: 65 ftProposed: ±62'-5"Parking:General Retail:1sp/ 200 sfOffice: 1sp/300 sfStorage:1sp/ 1,000 sfProvided: Customer 49 spDisplay11 spTotal60 spLandscape: 5% (min)Required:9,148 ±sf(0.05 x 182,952 sf)Provided:23,396 ±sfBuffer: 10 ft (min)SITE DATA U-Haul of Gardena14206 Van Ness AveGardena, CA 90249PRELIMINARYSITE PLAN865031zlpb01-26-21SP1 - PRELIMINARY -
ADARR RE-USEAREA
MOP/COMMRM
5 x 5
10 x 15TOTAL
PROPOSED MIX
10 x 10
5 x 10 %
%%
%
%7,075628335,100317021st Flr33%
%%
%
SQ. FT.%%8258
100
442,20021
606,00056101,5001414910,675
10 x 8 %56017%1801
NON CLIMATE - 32%LOCKERSIZE
7 x 8 %22404%000
39 ADA LOCKERS REQUIRED/PROVIDED
7 x 10 %49017%1700
2nd Flr55%SQ. FT.%%1,37561597,95032
11211,200253,75035925,217
%21601%21120%1700
3rd Flr65%SQ. FT.%%1,62561688,40033
%1800%000%21401
4th Flr65%SQ. FT.%%1,62561648,20033
%21601
CLIMATE - 68%
%21120%1700
5th FlrSQ. FT.% QTYSQ. FT.%TOTAL65%%1,62561678,35033
%1800%000%21401
10 x 20 %%0003 100
49,5004449516,50015110111,8491,620%%
%
100
4415 %%
%
100
10810,80043253,7501537225,395%%
%
100
10710,70043253,7501536925,217%%
%
100
10810,80043253,7501537125,3452,400212%6002 %36002 %36002 %36002 %
%%
%
%4,875619524,95033499
%32004 %11202 %35015
QTYSQ. FT.%CLIMATE TOTAL
%100
32,3004332311,250157575,9571,1121,80029
%
%%
%
%2,20068810,15028203
%24013 %11202 %14002
QTYSQ. FT.%NON-CLIMATE TOTAL
%100
17,200481725,250153535,89250860023
MOP/COMMRM
OPEN TO BELOW
ADARR
MOP/COMMRM
OPEN TO BELOW
MOP/COMMRM
ROOF
ADARR
MOP/COMMRM
ROOF
D&R AREA1,580± S.F.
BREAKROOMOFFICE
SHOWROOM2,112± NET S.F.(2,600± GROSS S.F.)MCO AREA3,820± S.F.
PROPOSED8,000 SFRETAIL/OFFICEBUILDING "A"
U-Haul of Gardena14206 S Van Ness AveGardena, CA 90249PROPOSEDFLOOR PLANS865031KMBNH05/22/2019A1SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"FIRST FLOOR PLANSECOND FLOOR PLANTHIRD FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"FOURTH FLOOR PLANFIFTH FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"RETAIL / OFFICE BUILDING
WEST ELEVATION - BLDG. B
U-Haul of Gardena14206 S Van Ness AveGardena, CA 90249PROPOSEDELEVATIONSBLDG. B865031KMBNH05/22/2018A2 EAST ELEVATION - BLDG. B
SOUTH ELEVATION - BLDG. B
SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0"
SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0"
SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0"
SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0"
NORTH ELEVATION - BLDG. B
WALL SIGN
WALL SIGN
WALL SIGN
ADARR RE-USEAREA
MOP/COMMRM
10x15
10x105x55x10
SINGLE LEVEL with ADA doorADA door
D&R AREA1,580± S.F.
BREAKROOMOFFICEADARR
SHOWROOM2,112± NET S.F.(2,600± GROSS S.F.)
counter placement andorientation per retail group
MCO AREA3,820± S.F.
TREESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONT 8FICUS MICROCARPA NITIDA / INDIAN LAUREL FIG24" BOX PALMSQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONT 17SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANA / QUEEN PALM14` B.T.H. MIN.SHRUBSQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONT. 113AGAVE ATTENUATA / FOXTAIL AGAVE5 GAL. 33ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII / GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS5 GAL. 37HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA / RED YUCCA5 GAL. 115MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS / PINK MUHLY GRASS5 GAL. 59MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA / PINE MUHLY5 GAL. 174OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE' TM / LITTLE OLLIE OLIVE5 GAL. 20PHORMIUM TENAX `RADIANCE` / NEW ZEALAND FLAX5 GAL. 3PORTULACARIA AFRA / ELEPHANT BUSH5 GAL.
PLANT SCHEDULEWUCOLSMODERATEWUCOLSMODERATEWUCOLSLOWVERY LOWVERY LOWLOWLOWLOWLOWVERY LOW GROUND COVERSQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAME9,852 SFCRUSHED ROCK / 4" DEPTH MIN.COLOR TO BE BAJA CRESTA RUBBLE FROM SOUTHWESTBOULDER AND STONE. SIZE: 1" - 3"4,550 SFWOOD BARK MULCH / TRIPLE-SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH3" DEPTH MIN. 14206 VAN NESS AVENUEPREPARED FORU-HAUL ©
Know what's before you dig.below.Call 811 R
LANDSCAPE NOTE:THE SELECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS BASED ON CULTURAL, AESTHETIC, ANDMAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITHAPPROPRIATE SOIL AMENDMENTS, FERTILIZERS AND APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTSBASED UPON A SOILS REPORT FROM AN AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY SOIL SAMPLETAKEN FROM THE SITE. DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL FILL IN BETWEEN SHRUBS TOSHIELD THE SOIL FROM THE SUN, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION, AND RUN-OFF. ALL SHRUBBEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A 3" DEPTH TO HELP CONSERVE WATER, LOWER SOILTEMPERATURE, AND REDUCE WEED GROWTH. THE SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TOGROW IN THEIR NATURAL FORMS. ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THEGUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF GARDENA MUNICIPAL CODE.IRRIGATION NOTE:AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE 100% COVERAGEFOR ALL PLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE WATER SUPPLY FOR THIS SITE ISA POTABLE WATER CONNECTION AND A DEDICATED IRRIGATION METER WILL BEPROVIDED. LOW VOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLANTGROWTH WITH NO WATER LOSS DUE TO WATER CONTROLLERS, AND OTHERNECESSARY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL POINT SOURCE SYSTEM SHALL BEADEQUATELY FILTERED AND REGULATED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDEDDESIGN PARAMETERS. ALL IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THEGUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF GARDENA MUNICIPAL CODE.I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AB-1881 AND APPLIEDTHEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN.________________CHRISTOPHER L FREY, LLA 6623 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSREQUIREDPROVIDED1 TREE PRE EVERY 10 PARKINGSPACES60 PARKING SPACES / 10 = 6TREES8 NORTH
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPEPLAN
L1.0
1 ORDINANCE NO. xxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA REZONING THE 4.2 -ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
14206 VAN NESS AVENUE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO
HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND AMENDING GARDENA MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 18.34.030X
WHEREAS, AREC 11, LLC (AREC) is the owner of that real property of approximately 4.2 acres located at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Van Ness Avenue, consisting of three parcels (APN Nos. 4081-028-023, -033, AND -051) and commonly known as 14206 Van Ness Avenue, Gardena (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is currently developed with a U -Haul facility that is decades old; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2021, A MERCO Real Estate Company, which provides real estate and development services to the U -Haul System (AMERCO and U-Haul are collectively referred to herein as “U -Haul”) filed applications for a zone change from General Commercial (C-3) to Heavy Commercial (C-4), a zone text amendment changing the development for self-storage facilities, a conditional use permit, and site plan in order to redevelop the existing U-Haul facility on the Property; and WHEREAS, U-Haul would like to redevelop the Property with a modern state of the art 5- story facility consisting of approximately 177,500 square feet, an approxim ate 8,000 square foot building for retail sales of moving supplies and offices, and a truck rental facility (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the current U-Haul operations are a legal non-conforming use as self- storage facilities are not allowed in the C-3 zone; and WHEREAS, as a legal non-conforming use U-Haul cannot expand its facilities and therefore has no incentive to make any improvements to the existing improvements; and WHEREAS, the C-4 zone currently provides that self-storage units cannot exceed more than 75 feet of ground floor street frontage on a major collector or arterial street ; and
WHEREAS, it would be an improvement for the City if the dilapidated buildings on the Property were removed and replaced with modern state of the art facilities; and WHEREAS, the City, through its environmental consultant, prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project which was circulated for a 20 day period from May 5, 2022 to May 24, 2022; and
2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on th e project entitlements on June 21, 2022 at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 10- 22 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the conditional use permit and site plan review required for the Project and recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program from the zone change and zone text amendment; and WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. PC 11-22 wherein it approved the conditional use permit and site plan review and recommended that the City Council approve the zone change and zone text amendment set forth in this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the zone change and zone text amendment on XXX, 2022 at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, prior to adopting this Ordinance the City Council adopted Resolution No. XXX adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The zoning for the 4.2 acre property consisting of APNs Nos. 4081-028- 023, -033, and - 051 is hereby changed from General Commercial (C -3) to Heavy Commercial (C-4), as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2 . Section 18.34.030 .X relating to conditional use permits for self -storage facilities in the C-4 zone is hereby amended to read as follows:
X. Self-storage facilities; provided that:
1. The facility complies with the requirements of Section 18.46.030C.17; and
2. If the facility fronts on a major collector or arterial street it shall be set back at least 50 feet from the public right-of-way. If not set back at least 50 feet, then no more than 75 feet of the total building frontage facing the collector or arterial street on the ground floor may be the self-storage building(s).
Any other portion of building(s) fronting the street are permitted if they are allowed or conditionally allowed uses in the zone, including a retail component of the self-storage use; and
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the thirty-first date after adoption.
3 SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase o f this ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published as required by law, in a publication of general circulation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________, 2022.
_____________________________
TASHA CERDA, Mayor
ATTEST:
MINA SEMENZA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
LISA E. KRANITZ, Assistant City Attorney
Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, Intermap and the GIS user community
Zoning 2021
C2
C3
C4
M2
P
R1
MUO
Proposed Zone Change #1-21
Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Los Angeles, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, Intermap and the GIS user community
Zoning 2021
C2
C3
C4
M2
P
R1
MUO
Adopted Zone Change #1-21
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY COMMISSION
Regular PEQC Meeting Notice and Agenda
Website: www.cityofgardena.org
Tuesday, June 21, 2022 – 7:00 PM
1700 W. 162nd Street, Gardena, California
5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5. A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #4-22
The Planning Commission considered a request for a conditional use permit to operate an adult day care facility within an 11,830 square foot tenant space in an existing medical and professional office building located in the General Commercial (C-3) zone which qualified for an exemption from CEQA as, an Existing Facility.
APPLICANT: David Kim
LOCATION: 1045 Redondo Beach Blvd, Suites 150-190 (APN: 6114-028- 050)
Staff Report (4-22).pdf
Resolution (4-22).pdf
Conditions of Approval (4-22) - Adult day
care.pdf Project Plans (CUP #4-22).pdf
Commission Action: The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. PC 9-22, by vote of 5-0-0, approving the project and directing staff to file a Notice of Exemption.
5.B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #5-21, ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT #2-21, ZONE CHANGE #1-21, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #1-21, SITE PLAN #3-21
The Planning Commission considered a request of the following entitlements to develop a new U-Haul Moving, Storage, Retail store:
Zone Text Amendment (ZTA #2-21) to amend Gardena Municipal Code Section 18.34.030, to allow for greater ground floor street frontage when a proposed self-storage facility is set back at least 50 feet from the public right-of-way in the Heavy Commercial (C-4) zone.
Zone Change (ZC #1-19) to change the zoning of the site from General Commercial (C-3) with a Mixed-Use Overlay (MUO) to Heavy Commercial (C-4) with a MUO;
Conditional Use Permit (CUP #1-21) to allow for the self-storage facility within the C-4 Zone;
2 Site Plan Review (SPR #3- 21) to approve the proposed site plan to develop a new 177,573 gross square foot, five-story storage facility to the northern portion of the site and a separate 8,000-square foot single-story building for retail sales and office use within the southern portion; The project also included the review and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (EA #5-21) APPLICANT: AMERCO Real Estate Company/U-Haul
LOCATION: 14206 Van Ness Avenue (APNs: 4061028051, 023, 033) Staff Report.pdf
ATTACHMENT A - Resolution No. PC 10-22 (MND).pdf
Exhibit A - Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with Appendices.pdf Exhibit B - Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (REVISED June 21, 2022) Exhibit C - Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program.pdf ATTACHMENT B - Resolution No. PC 11-
22.pdf Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval.pdf
Exhibit B - Project Plans.pdf
Exhibit C - Draft Ordinance approving the Zone Change and Zoning Amendment.pdf Exhibit D - Zone Change #1-21 Map.pdf
Commission Action: The Planning Commission continued the item to a future meeting which will be re-noticed in the Gardena Valley News and new mailers will be sent to all properties within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
3 City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 11.A
Section: DEPARTMENTAL
ITEMS - ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
Meeting Date: June 28, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING
:
RESOLUTION NO. 6589
, Adopting The City of
Gardena's Two-Year Budget For Fiscal Years 2022-2023 And 2023-2024 COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Staff Recommendation: Conduct Public Hearing; allow each speaker three (3) minutes; and Adopt Budget Resolution No. 6589
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:
Presented for Public Hearing and City Council consideration is the City of Gardena’s Proposed Two-Year Budget for Fiscal
Years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, including Combined General Fund, Enterprise Funds and Special Revenue Funds.
The Proposed Budget was presented to the City Council and the public at the May 24, 2022 City Council meeting and Staff conducted a Community Budget Forum on June 1, 2022. The proposed Budget was public noticed in the Gardena Valley News on June 16, 2022. It has
been available for review and comment on the City’s website since May 25, 2022.
The proposed budget is based on conservative revenue and expenditures in both fiscal years, is structurally balanced, and reports General Fund surpluses of $37,008 in Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 and $39,136 in Fiscal Year 2023-2024
. The delta for total revenues and total
expenditures for all funds is primarily due to the timing of Special Revenue Funds. Staff recommends City
Council adopt Resolution No. 6589, thereby adopting the Budget for Fiscal Years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.
Copies of the Adopted Budget will be available for review on the City’s website at www.cityofgardena.org
and in the
City Clerks Office.
FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:
Proposed Budget
Revenue
Expenditure
General Fund
$
76,653,769
$
76,616,761
Enterprise Fund
(Gtrans)
$
35,437,041
$
35,437,041
Enterprise Fund
(Sewer)
$
2,660,000
$
2,427,020
Special Revenue &
Other Funds
$
124,451,147
$
127,676,351
Total Fiscal Year
2022-2023
$
239,201,957
$
242,157,173
Proposed Budget
Revenue
Expenditure
General Fund
$
77,593,605
$
77,554,469
Enterprise Fund
(Gtrans)
$
49,768,535
$
49,768,535
Enterprise Fund
(Sewer)
$
2,686,450
$
2,047,172
Special Revenue &
Other Funds
$
78,379,960
$
78,747,473
Total Fiscal Year
2023-2024
$
208,428,550
$
208,117,649
ATTACHMENTS:
Reso 6589.pdf
Budget Book - Proposed.pdf
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
CITY OF GARDENA
PROPOSED
BUDGET
FISCAL
YEAR:
2022-2023 ----------------- 2023-2024
CITY O
F GARDENA
PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 and 2023/2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 BUDGET MESSAGE AND GENERAL INFORMATION
City Manager’s Budget Message ......................................................................................................... i City Organization Chart ........................................................................................................................ 2 City Officials .......................................................................................................................................... 3 City Directory ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Budget Goal .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Budget Process .................................................................................................................................... 6 Budget Calendar ................................................................................................................................... 9 Budget Document Guide ...................................................................................................................... 10 Fund Structure ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Fund Descriptions ................................................................................................................................. 12 Accounting Principles and Policies ...................................................................................................... 15 Community Profile ................................................................................................................................ 19 City Map ............................................................................................................................................. 20 City Facilities and Properties ................................................................................................................ 21 City History Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 24 City Appointed Commissions, Corporations, etc. ................................................................................ 25 SECTION 2 PROPOSED BUDGET SUMMARIES FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023-2023/2024 General Fund Revenue and Expenditures FY22/23 ........................................................................... 29 General Fund Revenue and Expenditures FY23/24 .......................................................................... 30 General Fund Historical Revenue and Expenditure Summary ........................................................... 31 General Fund – Fund Balances ........................................................................................................... 32 General Fund Top Five Revenue Sources .......................................................................................... 33 General Fund Revenues By Account .................................................................................................. 34 Summary of Fund Activity FY22/23 .................................................................................................... 36 Summary of Fund Activity FY23/24 ..................................................................................................... 39 Summary of Revenues and Expenditures FY22/23 ............................................................................ 42 Summary of Revenues and Expenditures FY23/24 ............................................................................ 43
CITY OF GARDENA
PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 and 2023/2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 3 DEPARTMENT PROPOSED BUDGETS FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 -2023/2024 Operational Organization Chart ........................................................................................................... 46 Elected & City Manager’s Office .........................................................................................................
Staffing Plan ................................................................................................................................... 47 49
Administrative Services ........................................................................................................................
Staffing Plan – All Funds ................................................................................................................ 51 53
Recreation & Human Services ............................................................................................................. 57 Staffing Plan – All Funds .............................................................................................................. 59 Police ..…. ............................................................................................................................................ 64 Staffing Plan – All Funds ............................................................................................................... 66 Public Works ........................................................................................................................................ 70 Staffing Plan – All Funds ............................................................................................................... 72 Community Development .................................................................................................................... 77 Staffing Plan – All Funds ............................................................................................................... 79 Non-Departmental ............................................................................................................................... 83 GTrans … ............................................................................................................................................. 87 Staffing Plan – All Funds ................................................................................................................ 89 SECTION 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, DEBT SERVICE, INTERNAL SERVICE Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ............................................................................................... 97 Debt Service Funds ......................................................................................................................... 118 Internal Service Funds ..................................................................................................................... 133 SECTION 5 APPENDIX
Glossary of Terms ................................................................................................................................ 138 Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 143 CITY MANAGER’S
BUDGET MESSAGE
PROPOSED BUDGET
FY 2022/2023 & 2023/2024
CCIITTYY MMAANNAAGGEERR’’SS BBUUDDGGEETT MMEESSSSAAGGEE
BBEETTTTEERR TTOOGGEETTHHEERR
PPRROOPPOOSSEEDD BBUUDDGGEETT –– FFIISSCCAALL YYEEAARR 22002222//22002233 –– 22002233//22002244 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
Presented tonight for Council approval is the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 and 2023/2024. This proposed budget details the City’s plan to continue fiscal prudence and transparency while expanding valuable programs and services for our community.
The past two years, the Gardena community, along with the state, the nation, and the world, have seen unprecedented times with the impacts associated from the COVID -19 pandemic. The initial shelter -in-place mandate and the extended stay -at-home order had halted many activities, shutting down schools, businesses, and leisure travel. While the impact was swift and significant, Gardena responded immediately and pivoted quickly to continue our high-q uality services to our community. I want to first express my gratitude for the generous response and hard work from both our Council and our staff. We transitioned our operations in ways we could not have imagined before, including moving our public meetings online, providing planning and permitting services remotely, and connecting with our community through frequent and enhanced communication channels. Our dedication to our community remains as strong as ever.
We have a robust $56 million budget for the City ’s Capital Improvement Projects, making a continued investment in City facilities and infrastructure. $29 million will be invested in City parks, playgrounds, faciliti es, and public parkways including the Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center, the new Rosecrans Community Center and the Mas Fukai Park Rehabilitation. The remaining $27 million will be utilized to maintain City streets, sewers, storm drains, sidewalk s, curbs, crosswalks, signs, and traffic signals. Investments in equipment maintenance and programs ensuring compliance with State mandated safety and air quality regulations will also utilize these funds.
Through these challenging times, our staff connected with our community to provide information on financial assistance for businesses and families who had been impacted by the effects of COVID-19. The City developed three programs utilizing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) funding in the amount of $901,984. These programs have provided grants to 21 small businesses totaling $363,169 as well as providing rental, utility, and food assistance to 94 Gardena families with grants totaling $185,136. The City also enhanced food delivery and serv ices to seniors as well as programs to keep youth and families socially
TASHA CERDA, Mayor
RODNEY G. TANAKA, Mayor Pro Tem
PAULETTE FRANCIS, Councilmember
MARK E. HENDERSON, Councilmember
ART KASKANIAN, Councilmember
MINA SEMENZA, City Clerk
J. INGRID TSUKI YAMA, City Treasurer
CLINT D. OSORIO, City Manager
CARMEN VASQUEZ, City Attorney
i
engaged to prevent social isolation. Th is steadfast commitment to our community highlight s the best of who we are in these past two years. I am proud of what we have accomplished and overcome as an organization.
FISCAL YEARS 2022/2023 & 2023/2024 PROPOSED BUDGET:
As background, staff developed a two-year budget for the fiscal years 2020/ 21-2021/22 which was approved by Council on June 23 , 2020 to ensure that the City’s spending plan was structurally balanced. The budget was then amended for fiscal year 2021/2022 to include revenues received from the American Rescue Plan (ARP) on May 24, 2022. Placing a multi-year budget in place was intended to provide our community a stronger sense of fiscal sec urity during rapidly changing politic al, social and economic periods. We also turn our attention towards long-term fiscal sustainability, being thoughtful in maintaining our organization al strength and remaining resilient t hrough identifying opportuni ties to diversify our revenue sources and expand our revenue base. Now more than ever, Gardena must have local control over local funds for local needs – allowing Gardena to be self -reliant and ensuring that local tax dollars are spent for Gardena residents. As our community grows and flourishes, our organization must use our resources strategically to support our community. While reducing expenditures is a good short-term measure, targeting investments in strategic focus areas to respond to our evolving communi ty is the long-term solution to maintaining resiliency. Balancing short -term response and long-term investment will remain a priority for our organization. I am confident that this focus will guide us through any challenging time and make Gardena stronger and better than we were before.
The total City budget consists of General Fund revenues, Special Revenue Funds such as grant funds, and Enterprise F unds for the Transportation Department and City Sewer Maintenance Program. Only General Fund revenue is at t he full discretion of the City Council for spending appropriations. All other revenue is otherwise restricted because of the funding sources. Proposed expenditures are based upon an analysis of past expenditures in conjunction with revenue forecasts based on current economic conditions. Should the proposed budget be approved, the General Fund will be structurally balanced with a modest surplus of $37,008 in 2022/2023 and $39,136 in 2023/2024. Special Revenue Funds, however, are budgeted based on all avail able funds which includes the total of projected ne w revenue for the fiscal year and any carry -over funds which have already b een received but not yet spent. Special Revenue Funds are structurally balanced including carry -over funds from the prior fiscal years. The proposed budget shows a surplus with a General Fund revenue budgeted for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 at $76,653,769 and expenditures at $76,616,761 for a net surplus of $37,008 on June 30, 2023. Fiscal Year 2022/2023 total revenues for all funds, including transfers, are $239,201,957 with expenditures, including transfer out, at $242,157,173. For Fiscal Year 2023/2024 General Fund revenue is budgeted at $7 7,593,605 and expenditures at $7 7,554,469 for a net surplus of $ 39,136 on June 30, 2024. Fiscal Yea r 2023 /2024 total r evenues for all funds, including transfers, are $239,201,957 with expenditures, including transfer out, at $242,157,173. The delta for total revenues and total expenditures for all funds is due to the timing of the Special Revenue Funds. ii
iii
COUNCIL POLICY DIRECTION:
On December 15, 2020, Council adopted the City of Gardena Three-Year Strategic Plan for 2020-2023. It was determined that an update was necessary to the existing Strategic Plan due to the extraordinary obstacles facing the City because of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as continuing global uncertainty. Goals were updated in the new plan to address pertinent and pressing issues in the community. This plan will serve as a three-year guide of the City’s vision for the future through several action steps – proactive steps meant to maintain and improve our diverse and vibrant community as we continue to improve on a promising new beginning. Department goals and functions can be found at the beginning of each departmental section.
The City Coun
cils focus and commitment to our community, in conjunction with the efforts of management and staff, resulted in the following:
• Passage of M
easure G resulting in an additional $17.7 million in revenues to the General Fund under local control for local needs • The City issued a $101 million Taxable Pension Obligation Bond at 3.29% to save $51 million in interest costs over the next 19 years • The City issued a $15 million Lease Revenue Bond at 1.99% to Finance the Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Cen ter, the Rosecrans Community Center, and multiple park improvements • The City competed for and was awarded the Prop 6 8 grant for the maximum grant amount of $8.5 million, the largest single competitive grant awarded to the City, to fund the Ga rdena Community Aquatic & Senior Center. The City also received an appropriation from Congresswoman Maxine Waters for $1.4 million for the same project. • The City implemented a Financial Trans parency Dashboard to enhance transparency and public e ngagement. See QR codes below to access the full budget document as well as the Financial Transparency Dashboard.
ACCESS THE FULL CITY BUDGET HE RE: ACCESS THE DASHBOARD HERE:
iv
IN CONCLUSION:
The Fiscal Year 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 budget has been developed to strike a thoughtful balance between the short-term and long-term.
What I hope to accomplish with this budget is to provide the Council with a comprehensive framework with which t o make decisions. Even in challenging times, hope and op portunities abound. Decisions that are being made now will help maintain sustainability that will serve Gardena well in the future. The events in the past two years have certainly been unprecedented , but the support from the Council to our community and t o our organization have been just as unprecedented. Our core principles remain the same: to execute on the Council’s vision and to serve our community with high-caliber services. With this as our anchor, I am confident that whether we face new opportunities or whether we face challenging circumstances, we will come out better, stronger, and more resilient than we were before.
I would like to acknowledge Department Heads, Budget Coordinators, and the Administrative Services Budget Team, under the direction of Ray Beeman, Director of Administrative Services, who wor ked as a cohesive team to create our annual budget. I also want to thank t he leaders of the Gardena Police Officers Association (GPOA), the Gardena Management Employees Organization (GMEO), and the Gardena Municipal Employees Association (GMEA) , who are an important part of the team, as they faithfully represent the intere sts of their membership and work with City management for the benefit of this community. We are still better together.
Respect fully submitted,
CLINT D.
OSORIO, MPA
City Manager
v
PRESENTED TO
City of Gardena
California
For the Biennium Beginning
July 01, 2020
Executive Director
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Distinguished
Budget Presentation
Award
HIGHER QUALITY OF LIFE
…ACHIEVED BY CONSISTENT & CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
OUR MISSION
The elected leadership and employees of the City of Gardena individually and collectively are committed to maintaining an efficient and effective government that ensures the highest quality of life, a safe and attractive environment, and a sound economic future for the community.
OUR VISION
We envision Gardena as one of the most desired communities in which to live, do business, work, and play in the South Bay.
OUR DUTY
As public servants it is our duty and our desire to provide reliable service guided by our commitment to these Core Values.
ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES
• Fiscal Accountability & Sustainability
• Workforce Excellence
• Community Involvement
COMMUNITY VALUES
• Safe Community Environment
• Sustainable Economic Development
• Attractive & Livable Neighborhoods
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
GENERAL INFORMATION
1 CITY OF GARDENA ORGANIZATION CHART
CITIZENS OF GARDENA
APPOINTED CITY MANAGER (CEO)
ELECTED & CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
ELECTED MAYOR
ELECTED CI
TY COUNCIL
ELECTED CITY CLERK
APPOINTED DEPUTY CLERK
ELECTIONS & PUBLIC RECORDS
ELECTED CITY TREASURER
APPOINTED DEPUTY TREASURER
PUBLIC FUNDS & INVESTMENTS
APPOINTED COMMISSIONS
& BOARDS
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
COMMISSIONGARDENA MUNICIPAL BUS LINES
GTRANS
Transit Administration
Transportation Operations
Special Transit Services
Transit Equipment & Facilities
RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Program & Facility Administration
Recreation & Leisure Services
Sports Leagues
Special Events
Youth, Family & Senior Services
Permits & Licensing
Building & Planning
Business License Enforcement
Animal Control & Code Enforcement
Economic Development
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Police Administration
Police Oper
ations
Police Support Services
Transit Security
Public Safety & Information
Emergency Preparedness
Parking Enforcement
GJIPP
POLICE
Parks & Grounds Maintenance
Tree Trimming (Citywide)
City Facilities Maintenance
Streets & Traffic Signals/Signs
Sanitation, Recycling, Sewers
Engineering & Capital Projects
Handy Worker Program
PUBLIC WORKS
HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
RECREATION & PARKS COMMISSION
SENIOR CITIZENS COMMISSION
YOUTH COMMISSION
FIRE SERVICES
(CONTRACTED) - LA COUNTY
CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Fiscal Resources
Technology Resources
Risk Management
Investments
Purchasing
Human Resources
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Equipment Maintenance
AQMD Programs
CITY EQUIPMENT
(PW/GEN FUND)
Organization Administration
Policy Development/Implementation
Strategic Planning
Citizen, Business, Agency Relations
Intergovernmental Relations
CITY ATTORNEY
(CONTRACTED)
RENT MEDIATION BOARD
2 CITY OFFICIALS
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Tasha Cerda, Mayor
Occupation: Insurance Agent
Elected: City Clerk – March 2009
Appointed: Councilmember – September 2009
To fill unexpired term due to resignation of Councilmember Elected: Councilmember – March 2011
Elected: Councilmember – March 2013
Elected: Mayor – March 2017
Current Term Expires: June 2022
Rodney G. Tanaka, Mayor Pro Tem
Occupation: Retired Police Lieutenant/Licensed Pastor
Elected: Councilmember – March 2017
Current Term Expires: June 2022
Paulette Francis
, Councilmember
Occupation: Teacher
Elected: Councilmember – March 2020
Current Term Expires: March 2024
Mark E. Henderson, Councilmember
Occupation: College Professor
Elected: Councilmember – March 2015
Elected: Councilmember – March 2020
Current Term Expires: March 2024
Art Kaskanian, Councilmember
Occupation: Business Owner/Realtor
Elected: Councilmember – March 2017
Current Term Expires: June 2022
CITY CLERK AND CITY T
REASURER
Mina Semenza, City Clerk
Occupation: Real Estate
Elected: City Clerk – March 2013
Elected: City Clerk – March 2017
Current Term Expires: June 2022
J. Ingrid Tsukiyama, City Treasurer
Occupation: Re
tired
Elected: City Treasurer – March 2005
Elected: City Treasurer – March 2009
Elected: City Treasurer – March 2013
Elected: City Treasurer – March 2017
Current Term Expires: June 2022
APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Clint D. Osorio, City Manager
Appointed Acting City Manager in June 2019
Appointed City Manager in December 2019
Carmen Vasquez, City Attorney
Appointed as Contract City Att orney in January 2020
Pe
ter L. Wallin, Deputy City Attorney
Appointed as Contract City Att orney in February 2009
Lisa K
ranitz, Assistant City Attorney
Appointed as Contract City Att orney in February 2009
EXECUTIVE STAFF
– (All Appointed)
Michael Saffell, Police Chief
Ray Beeman, Director of Administrative Services
Greg Tsujiuchi, Community Development Director
Ernie Crespo, Transportation Director
Stephany Santin, Director of Recreation
Allan Rigg, Director of Public Works
Brian Bennett, Los Angeles County Assistant Fire Chief
3 ELECTED & ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
Mayor
Tasha Cerda (310) 217-9507
Mayor Pro Tem
Rodney G. Tanaka (310) 217-9507
Councilmembers
Paulette C. Francis (310) 217-9507
Mark E. Henderson (310) 217-9507
Art Kaskanian (310) 217-9507
City Clerk’s / City Treasurer's Office
City Clerk
Mina Semenza (310) 217-9565
Deputy City Clerk
Becky Romero (310) 217-9566
City Treasurer
J. Ingrid Tsukiyama (310) 217-9664
Deputy City Treasurer
Danny Rodriguez (310) 217-9693
(310) 217-9503
(310) 217-9544
Administrative Office
City Manager
Clint D. Osorio
City Attorney
Carm
en Vasquez
Director
Ray Beeman (310) 217-9502
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief of Police
Michael Saffell (310) 217-9601
RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Director
Stephany Santin (310) 217-9537
GTRANS
Director
Ernie Crespo (310) 965-8888
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Director
Greg Tsujiuchi (310) 217-9526
PUBLIC WORKS
Director
Allan Rigg (310) 217-9570
LA County Fire Department
Assistant Fire Chief
Brian Bennett (310) 329-3315
Gardena Station 162nd Street
Gardena Station 135th Street
4 BUDGET GOAL
To develop and maintain a struc
turally balanced budget that maximizes all
City resources necessary to build, sustain, and enhance the City’s future.
BUDGET TEAM
CITY MANAGER – CLINT D. OSORIO
DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES – RAY BEEMAN
Budget Managers – Mary Simonell, Khoi Quach, Sarah Read, Yurina Kim, Danny Rodriguez
BUDGET COORDINA
TORS
Elected and City Manager's Offices - Alejandra Orozco, Becky Romero Police – Captain Todd Fox, Captain Vince Osorio, Mayra Maciel Public Works – Kevin Kwak, Kevin Thomas, Kim Nolan
Community Development – Greg Tsujiuchi, Amanda Acuna
Recreation & Human Services - Christina Theobald, Nikki Sweeney, Nicola Howard Capital Impr
ovement Projects - Jun De Castro
Transportation Department - Ernie Crespo, Dana Pynn, Jennifer Abro 5 BUDGET PROCESS
MISSION OF THE BUDGET PROCESS: To help decision makers make informed choices about the provision of services and capital assets and to promote stakeholder participation in the process. - Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) BUDGET GOAL: T
o develop and maintain a structurally balanced budget that maximizes City resources necessary to build, sustain and enhance the City’s future.
Preparation and adoption of the fiscal year budget is guided by the following five organizational principles set by the City Council:
1. Fiscal Integrity and Long-Term Financial Stability
2. Quality Economic Development
3. Workforce Excellence
4. Continually Improving Quality of Life for Residents
5. Maintaining an Attractive, Vital Livable Community
BUDGET OBJECTI
VES: These organizational principles translate into
the following budget objectives:
1. Establishing budgetary and fiscal policies that address current needs and set the foundation for future decisions.
2. Adopting a structurally balanced budget with realistic annual revenue project ions and expenditures below revenue
projections.
3. Pursuing grant and other special funds to augment City services in specific program areas.
4. Building adequate reserve funds to meet the City’s current and future obligations.
5. Creating public -private partnerships with mutual economic and service benefit.
6. Setting charges and users fees to recover City costs for providing services as much as possible but without
overburdening citizens, businesses, and property owners.
7. Replacing or upg rading vehicles and other capital equipment based on comparative cost of required maintenance for safety and performance efficiency.
8. Implementing efficiencies in service delivery and departmental operations that improve customer service and the quality of life in the community.
9. Enhancing employee skills and compensation to attract and maintain the best qualified staff and highest level of public service possible.
10. Providing superior public safety including community -based policing to reduce crime.
11. Providing community service programs that meet a variety of interests and needs.
12. Improving the public image and physical appearance of the City with proper maintenance of public right s-of-way and code enforcement of private properties.
BUDGET ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES
Citizens, pr
operty owners and businesses are encouraged to share
ideas and provide input concerning the community and budgetary programs. This can be accomplished by discussing issues with City’s commissions and committees or directly with program m anagers.
Citizen input received during public hear ings or other correspondence is not only invited but needed to ensure that public needs are met.
Finance C
ommittee, comprised of two councilmembers (appointed by the Mayor) and the City Treasurer, reviews the City’s revenues and 6 BUDGET PROCESS
expenditures each quart
er and the City Manager’s proposed budget
before submitting to the City Council for adoption.
City Council pr
ovides direction for the preparation of the budget
through adoption of polic ies and ongoing input. Council is responsible for the review and adoption of the City budget.
City Manager is res
ponsible for:
providing staff direction for budget preparation
considering departmental budget requests and requests for supplemental budget items
reviewing projected revenues and expenditures with the Director of Administrative Services
formulating a comprehensive budget proposal for
submission to the City Council
presentation of a propos
ed budget
overseeing budget
administration throughout t
he fiscal
year
Director of Administrative Services is responsible for:
evaluating and report
ing the City’s fiscal condition
providing comprehensive revenue forecasts
providing budget orientation and training to all
departments
monitoring budget throughout the year and providing
updates to the City Manager and City Council
OVERVIEW OF CITY BUDGET PROCESS
The City’s annual
budget process commences in February with the
distribution of the updated Budget Manual that details the City’s general budgetary policy and the specific goals and objectives for the upcoming fiscal year. Departments are given specific instructions and timelines, the City’s chart of accounts, a rate schedule for apportioned cost s such as liability and health insurance, and budget forms and formats.
Each department hea
d is required to select a responsible individual in the department to be the Budget Coordinator. Following the budget kickoff by the City Manager and Director, all correspondenc e and meetings are conducted with the departments’ Budget Coordinators and the Finance Budget Team.
In March, the Director provides the City Manager with the tentative General Fund Revenue Projections. These set the pa
rameters for the
development of a budget. In turn, the preliminary departmental budget worksheets are returned to the Fiscal Resources Division with instructi
ons for modified expenditure requests based upon the available monies projected.
Target Budget Requests: It is the responsibility of each department to submit, as part of the budget request to the City Manager, a complete Statement of Justification. The statement must provide a formal and comprehensive explanation and justification of the propose d departmental budget program. This is important because the initial budget request submitted by each department is based on maintaining the current level of service. The “Target Budget” provides a point of origin for the detailed study and evaluation of each budget request by the City Manager compared to available revenue. The Target Budget has four basic components:
1. Proposed Work Plan: Department and program narratives, major accomplishments for fiscal year ending, major goals and objectives for the new fiscal year, w orkload/performance indicators and projected revenues/cost recovery from
department programs.
2. Proposed Staffing Plan: Departmental organization chart, personnel worksheets (benefits calculat ions), personnel schedules, staffing levels, and personnel by program activity.
3. Proposed Spending Plan: Department line- item wo rksheets, expenditure request worksheets, justification statements (if required), computer repair and replacement fund summary and capital expenditures one- year request and justification statement.
4. Revenue Projections: Department revenues based on the fees collected as part of the department’s operation. Emphasis 7 BUDGET PROCESS
is pl aced on maximizing cost r ecovery as appr opriate and justification for new or increase in existing fees.
Supplemental Budget Requests: Separate from the Target Budget s, departments submit a “wish list” of additional personnel, new or replacement equipment, or funding for new or expanded programs. All Supplemental Budget Requests are reviewed jointly with priority given to funding requests that best meet the objectives for the fiscal year and improve services across departmental lines. Unfunded requests are set aside until additional funding can be identified. This process will be expanded over the next fiscal year with a goal of developing a multi -year budgeting plan for rebuilding staffing levels, equipment replacement and program expansion.
Capital Outlay Requests: Capital requests are submitted separately with priority given to the replacement of aging and outdated equipment.
With the Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Budget, a “Technology Fund" was
instituted to protect the City’s investment in technology by ensuring funds to properly maintain and replace equipment when needed.
This is funded through departmental contributions based on a usage formula.
City Managers Review: At the end
of April, the City Manager reviews
a draft budget summary presented by the Director. Following the review and approval,
the Proposed Budget, or City
Manager’s Budget as it is somet
imes called, is finalized and printed for
distribution. Much of the focus of the annual budget process is on General Fund programs since this is the only funding area that is fully discretionary. Grant funded programs follow a similar process but are more specifically directed by the regulations of the particular funding source. The City’s adopted budget incorporates all City programs and specifically identifies the funding source for each.
Preliminary Budget: In May, a preliminary budget document is created, and the City Manager meets independently with each department head to review the department’s goals, objectives, programs and funding needs for the upcoming fiscal year. It is also the department head’s opportunity to ensure that all the needs of his/her department are understood and carefully considered in the allocation of funds.
Budget Hearing: A public workshop hearing is held approximately one month before the a doption of the City’s budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The City Manager presents to the Council the overall goals and objectives for the fiscal year, along with a review of significant factors affecting proposed revenues and expenditures.
Public c omment is he ard thr oug
hout t he month and revisions may b e
made to the budget as directed by the City Council.
Adoption: City Council shall adopt the budget by Resolution at the conclusion of the budget hearings. The adoption of the budget must occur prior to July 1, which is the beginning of the new fiscal year.
Budget Cont rol and Amendments : Since the budget is a planning document, throughout the fiscal year there may be a need for adjustments in the spending plan. As new revenues are identified, or unexpected expenditures arise, departments may need to re- prioritize the expenditure plan for their operations. If the modification can be made within the department’s approved appropriation, then the Department Head may make a written request for a budget transfer to reallocate funds as needed. The budget transfer request i s sent to Fiscal Resources for review and approval. Accounting staff verifies that funds are available as
requested, and the Director approves the
transfer. However, if the
department is unable to make the needed
adjustments within their department appropriation, additional approval is needed. The City Manager is
authorized to transfer funds between
departments up t
o ten thousand dollars. Amounts exceeding ten
thousand dollars must have the approval of the City Council. 8 BUDGET CALENDAR - FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 AND 2023-2024 BUDGET
February 14, 2022 –
April 18, 2022
During this period staff will be developing a plan of action for the FY 22/23 and 23/24 revenue projections, expenditure projections, and performance goals and narratives . Departments will be meeting with the City Manager to develop a proposed budget. The proposed budget will be presented for public review at the May 24th Council Meeting.
Staff continues dev
eloping various budget scenarios and monitoring the effects of COV ID-19 on the City ’s revenue streams.
April 6-7, 2022 Finance to meet with individual departments to discuss budget and supplemental requests April 4, 2022 Budget Requests Reviewed – analysis prepared for City Manager’s review April 18, 2022 City Manager Review - Preliminary FY 22/23 and FY 23/24 Budget Review May 12, 2022 Finance Committee – overview of FY 22/23 and FY 23/24 preliminary budget May 24, 2022 -
June 28, 2022 Public Review period for Proposed FY 22/23 and FY 23/24 Budget June 1, 2022 Community Budget Forum
June 28, 2022 Budget Hearing and Adoption of Budget FY 22/23 & FY 23/24 and Gann Resolution for Fiscal Year 22/23.
June 30, 2022 FY 22/23 and FY 23/24 budget to print / posted on website. 9 BUDGET DOCUMENT GUIDE
The “Adopted Budget” is the document that sets the expenditure policies for all monies received by the City. The budget is based on a “fiscal year” that begins each year on July 1 and ends twelve- months later on June 30. City staff develops a proposed budget under the direction of the City Manager. The “Proposed Budget” is presented at a Public Hearing with the City Council for consideration.
The City Council makes whatever changes they deem appropriate and vote to adopt the budget for the next fiscal year.
The budget is
designed to give the City Council a clear roadmap of
the City’s expenditure needs and available resources so that the Council can make sound budgetary decisions. It is through the appropriation of funds that the Council sets the program and project priorities for the ensuing fiscal year . This year two consecutive one- year budgets were presented to the City Council for consideration.
This proposed budget will cover fiscal year s 2022-2023 and 2023- 2024.
The budget document
begins with the City Manager’s budget
message, which provides an overview of the Fiscal Year Operating Budget by highlighting programs and major projects. Economic factors, changes in revenue, expenditures, and staffing levels are also addressed in the budget message. The budget document is divided into the following sections:
Budget Message
Intr
oduction
Budget Summaries
Operating Budget – General Fund with corresponding
Special Revenue Funds
Operating Budget – Enterprise Funds
Debt Service Funds
Internal Service Funds
Capital Improvement Program
Appendix
The Budget Summari
es section provides revenue and expenditure
analysis. This section presents historical data for comparative purposes along with staffing levels.
The Operating B
udgets secti on contains program description and
public service goal s. All Special Revenue Funds are grouped by operating department to provide a complete picture of department resources and functions.
The Appendix sec
tion contains the glossary of terms, abbreviations
and acronyms, and index.
10 CITY OF GARDENA FUND STRUCTURE
BUDGETARY FUNDS
Governmental Funds Proprietary Funds
General Fund
Major Fund
(See description)
Debt Service
Funds
Enterprise
Funds
Internal Service
Funds
Special Revenue
Funds
Capital
Improvement
Funds - Major
GTrans
Major Fund
(See description)
Sewer
Fund
–Self Insurance Liability
–Self Insurance Workers Comp
–Self Insurance Health Benefit
–2006 A Refunding COPs
–2007A Refunding Revenue Bonds
–2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds
–2017 Lease Financing
–2020 Taxable Pension Obligation Bond
–2021 Lease Revenue Bond
–Bicycle & Pedestrian Program
–PROP C Local Return
–Measure R – Local and Transit
–Measure A
–Department of Transportation
–Caltrans
–Consolidated Street Lighting District
–Artesia Landscape District
–State Gas Tax
–South Coast AQMD
–Community Development Block Grants
–Senior Bureau Grants
–Gardena Family Childcare
–Asset Seizure – Federal and Non-Federal
–Department of Justice (DOJ)
–California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
–Traffic Safety
–Supplemental Law Enforcement (SLESF)
–Park Land In Lieu
–Police Department Grants
–Post Employment Benefits Fund
–SB 1
–Measure M – Local
and Transit
–FEMA COVID-19
–American Rescue Plan (ARP)
–Prop 68
A major fund is classified as any fund which is at least 10% of the total appropriation 11 FUND DESCRIPTIONS
GENERAL FUND (Major Fund)
The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City and the only totally unrestricted fund that can be used for general operating expenses such as public safety, parks, recreation, engineering, planning and administration.
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (Grants)
Currently the City receives additional funding from various sources to provide many services which otherwise would be impossible for the City to support. Special revenue funds are restricted to a specific purpose and for a certain time frame. Continued or new funding is based on the federal, state or county which is providing the resources. The City is always seeking new grants for the betterment of the citizens and community .
Following is a description of the major grant funding that the City receives.
Artesia Lan
dscaping District: To account for monies received for the maintenance of medians on Artesia Boulevard.
American Rescue P
lan: Funding to address the devastating economic and health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asset Seizure:
Monies seized from criminal activities and used solely for law enforcement purposes.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): The CDBG program works to ensure decent affordable housing, to provide services to the mos t vulnerable citizens in our communities, and to create jobs through the expansion and retention of businesses. This federal funding is received through the Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD) and is an important tool for assisting local government in tackling the serious economic challenges facing the community.
Consolidated Street Lighting: To account for monies received for the maintenance and improvement of streetlights.
FEMA COVID-19: This Treasury Department allocatio n provides funding to local government t o support th e public health respons e and lay the foundation for a strong and equitable economic recovery.
Gardena Family Childcare: This grant provides low-cost childcare to low -moderate income families as well as offering early educ ation and development classes. This program through Cal SAFE also helps pregnant and parenting students and their children. These programs are funded through the California Department of Education.
Prop 68: $8.5 million competitive grant awarded to fund the Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center.
Measure M: To account for monies received for the improvement of freeway traffic flow; expand the rail and rapid transit system; repave local streets, repair
potholes, and synchronize signals; and to make public transportation more accessible, convenient, and affordable. 12 FUND DESCRIPTIONS
Measure R: To acc
ount for monies received for the improvement of local street traffic flow; repave local streets , repair potholes, and synchronize signals; and to make public transportation more accessible, convenient, and affordable.
Police Gra
nts: The Depa rtment of Justice, the California Office of Traffic Safety, and the Supplemental Law Enforcement Program provide funding to improve public safety. Grant funding pays for additional officers, improved technology, DUI checkpoints, gang enforcement programs, and pedestrian safety programs. Funding from these grants helps to promote public safety and awareness.
Post-Employm
ent Benefits Fund: This fund was set up to account for the City’s Other Post- Employment Benefits it pays to retired employees.
Prop C: To acc
ount for monies received for the reduction of local street traffic congestion; improve air quality; repav e local streets and repair potholes; and to make public transportation more accessible, convenient, and efficient.
Senate Bill
1 (SB 1): To account for monies received for the maintenance and rehabilitation and safety improvements on state highways, local streets and roads, and bridges and to improve the state’s trade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities.
Senior Bureau Grants: In 1965 the federal government passed the Older Americans Act to provide grant funding for programs which benefit seniors. This includes nutrition programs in the community and for those who are homebound; programs for low -income minority elders; health promotion and disease prevention activities; in- home services for frail elders, and those services which protec t the rights of older persons such as the long-term care ombudsman program.
South Coas
t AQMD Fund: To account for monies received from mot or vehicle tax and expended on programs to reduce air pollution which are necessary to implement the California Clean Air Act of 1988.
State Gas Tax: To account for monies received and expended from the state and county gas tax allocation.
Traffic Safety: To account for monies received under Section 1463 of the Penal Code and expended on traffic safety.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
Are used to account for financial resources used for capital improvement projects .
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Are used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of all general long- term debt obligations of the City. 13 FUND DESCRIPTIONS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
A proprietary fund accounts for business type activities of the City that receive a significant portion of funding through user charges with the intent to fully recover the cost of service. The Enterprise and Internal Services Funds are proprietary type funds.
Enterprise Funds:
GTrans (Maj or Fund) accounts for user charges, fees, feder al, state and county grants and all operating costs associated with the operation of the City’s bus lines. Although the GTrans is a separately op erating enterprise fund, it is still operationally a department of the City.
Sewer Fun d accounts for fees charged to users of the City’s sewer system. The fee is based upon the amount of domestic water used. The revenue is used to replace, rehabilitate, maintain, and improve the City’s sewer system.
Internal Service Funds:
The Internal Service Funds account for financing of goods or services provided by one City department to other departments of the City on a cost-reimbursement basis and consist of the following funds:
Self-Insurance Liability Fund
Self-Insurance Workers’ Compensation Fund
Self-Insurance Health Benefit Fund
FIDUCIARY FUNDS
Account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. Fiduciary funds are normally not budg eted because typically the trust agreement or law already provides adequate control over the trust fund resources. 14 ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES
FUND ACCOUNTING
The accounts of the C
ity are organized on the basis of funds and
account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for, in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The financial section in this budget is grouped by generic fund types and broad fund categories as follows:
Governmental Funds Proprietary Funds
General Fund Enterprise Funds
Special Revenue Funds Internal Service Funds
Capital Improvement Funds
Debt Service Funds
BASIS OF A
CCOUNTING AND BUDGETING
The City’s Governmental Fund Types (General, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Projects Funds) are accounted for and budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Revenue considered susceptible to accrual includes property taxes, sales taxes, interest and motor vehicle license fees.
Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. An exception to the general rule is compensated absences not payable within one year, and interest and principal on long- term debt which are recorded when due.
Proprieta
ry Fund Types are accounted for on an “income
determination” or “cost of services” measurement focus. Accordingly, all assets and all liabilities are included on the balance sheets, and the reported fund equity (total reported assets less total reported liabilities) provides an indication of the economic net worth of the funds. The operating statements for the City’s Proprietary Fund Types report increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total economic net worth. All Proprietary Fund Types are accounted for and budgeted using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when earned, and expenses are recognized when incurred.
FINANCIAL POLICIES
The following financial policies represent the long- standing principles and traditions which guide the City in its fiscal decisions.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
The City’s F
inance Committee is comprised of two c ouncilmembers,
(appointed by the Mayor) and the City Treasurer. The Committee meets quarterly with the City Manager to review and make recommendations on the City’s budget, debt, and other financial actions.
AUDITING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING
• California state statute requires an annual audit of the books of account, financial records and transactions of all administrative departments of the City by Independent Certified Public Accountants.
• The City will produce annual financial reports in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as outlined in Governmental Accounting, Auditing and Financ ial Reporting (GAAFR).
REVENUE POLICY
• The City will try to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to shelter it from short run fluctuations in any one- revenue source.
15 ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES
• The City w
ill follow an aggressive pol icy of collecting revenues, augmented in Fiscal Year 2002 by the implementation of the City’s new cashiering system.
• The City will establish all user charges and fees at a level closely related to the full cost (operating, direct, indirect and capital) of providing the service. The City will continue to review fees/charges periodically.
INVESTMENT OF IDLE FUNDS
• The safeguarding of all public monies shall be of the highest priority. Public money shall not be invested or managed in any manner, which would jeopardize the safety of the principal pursuant to California Government Code Section 53635.
• The City’s investment policy is reviewed and approved annually by the City Council.
• Direct responsibility for managing the City’s investment portfolio rests with the City Treasurer.
• All investments are made in accordance with the following criteria, stated in order of priority: safety, liquidity and yield.
PURCHASING POLICY
• The City’s departments will purchase the best value obtainable, securing the maximum benefit for each tax dollar expended, while giving all qualified vendors an equal opportunity to do business with the City.
• All purchases $30 ,000 - $50,000 require written quotes and must be ratified by the City Council.
• All purchases with a total cost over $50,00 0 must be procured by a formal bid and can only be authorized and awarded by the City Council.
• Whenever possible, local vendors shall be included as sources for all purchases.
RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
• The City is self -insured against each general liabilit y claim for the first $ 750,000 and each workers’ compensation claim for the first $500,000 and $750,000 for each GTrans claim against the City. The City carries insurance in excess of these amounts.
• The City’s role in managing its risk managem ent program is to be pr oactive, in nature, which will be accomplished through careful monitoring of losses, working closely with the third -party administrator and designing and implementing programs to minimize risk and reduce losses.
FIXED ASSET POLICY
• To safeguard the investment in fixed assets.
• To use the fixed asset system as a management tool for replacement of recurring items to avoid duplication and inefficient use of fixed assets.
• To comply with state laws and regulations.
• To provide information for preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP with emphasis placed on completion of GASB 34 requirements.
• When disposing of fixed assets , every effort should be made to recover some of the original cost by selling and or trading in the fixed asset.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICY
• The City will develop a multi -year plan for capital
improvements, update it annually and make all capital
improvements in accordance with this plan.
• Immediate capital replacement needs and smaller capital projects are funded on a pay-as-you-go basis through a budget transfer.
16 ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES
• Capital improvement
s involve the outlay of substantial funds;
therefore, the City prioritizes the use of non- general fund monies to support these expenditures.
DEBT POLICY
• To provide for proper planning of capital expenditures, financing requirements and guidelines for issuance of various debt instruments.
• To hold borrowing costs at a minimum and maintain ratios within established standards.
• To secure favorable ratings and competitive lower interest rates on all types of borrowing instruments, thereby providing a savings to all taxpayers.
BORROWING INSTRUMENTS
• Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes to be issued no more than once a year. Maximum maturity of notes wi ll be twelve months from date of issue. Notes will be rated by Moody’s Investor Service, Standard and Poor’s Ratings Group or Fitch Investors Service, L.P.
• Certificates of Participation (COPS) can be used as a financial alternative for acquiring assets.
• Revenue Bonds – City Council will evaluate all requests. • Mello-Roos financing – City Council will evaluate all requests.
BUDGET – GENERAL POLICY
• City staff will present to the City Council a structurally balanced budget proposal that does not rely on “one-t ime” revenues.
Annual recurring expenditures will be funded with annual recurring revenues.
• The City Council w
ill, by June 30 of each year , adopt a
structurally balanced operating and capital improvement spending plan for the ensuing fiscal year , where operating revenues are equal to, or exceed, operating expenditures. • The City will align and amend as appropriate its operating and capital spending plan with its strategic action plan priorities and economic development plan.
• City staff will complete and pre sent a quarte rly Budget a nd Economic Condition Analysis to the Finance Committee.
Recommended budget adjustments will be submitted to the City Council for consideration and approval.
• The City will establish and
maintain a General Fund Reserve
equal to at least twenty five percent (25%) of its annual General Fund operating budget. The amount will be revised annually and such funds will be expended only with the
approval of the City Council.
BUDGET – REVENUE
• Revenue projections will be based on multiple sources of information including, but not limited to , historical trends, federal, state and regional economic forecasts, service levels, changes in legislation and mandates and other statistical resources generally available.
• The City will develop and incorporat e into each s pending plan revenue and expenditure projections for five (5) additional years into the future and amend the projection annually as part of the budget review.
• When projecting revenues, the City will take into consideration the diversity, volat ility and sta bility of its revenue stream and will as much as possible base its core operating cost on historically stable revenue sources.
• The City will stabilize its revenue base by forecasting its annual operating expenditures on diverse revenue sources and limiting revenue growth projections in each revenue category.
17 ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES
• Revenues received
in excess of the budgeted projections will
be used for one-time expenditures or set aside as reserve.
BUDGET – EXPENDITURES
• Expenditures will be budgeted realistically for each expenditure category and can be adjusted internally as may become
necessary but will not exceed appropriation limits.
• Contingency funds will be included in the annual budget to provide funding for unanticipated o perating cost increases, one-time purchasing opportunities and one- time emergency expenditures to repair equipment and facilities. Unexpended funds will carry-over to the next fiscal year.
• In considering reductions in service levels, program cuts, or staffing reductions, the city will first assess options to improve operational efficiencies and develop additional revenues to cover the cost to continue the existing level of public service with existing Budget Policies.
• Limiting Cost
with Fees for Ser vice: Certa in services are used
selectively by a limited number of participants and, therefore, are not mandated City services. These services are provided based on individual interest and are provided only as funding is available. To fund these programs without limi ting basic services necessary for the general public, the City will perform a cost analysis to identify the city’s fully burdened cost for providing those services and , to the extent reasonable, set the fee based on full cost recovery. Such fee s shall be up dated frequently to ensure that the fees are reflective of actual city costs for the delivery of services.
• Unexpended funds within a fiscal year will be held in reserve or appropriated for one-time expenditures.
BUDGET – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
• Capital improvements will be financed primarily through special revenue funds, user fees, service charges, and developer agreements when benefits can be speci fically attributed to users of the facilities.
• The City will analyze the impact of capital improvem ents to ensure that operational and maintenance costs are balanced with on- going revenue to support facility operations.
18 COMMUNITY PROFILE – 2022
Gardena, Califor
nia is a full-service city located just 13 miles south of metropolitan Los Angeles in the South Bay area of Los Angeles County.
Gardena is strategically located near the intersections of the Harbor (110), San Diego (405), and Gardena (91) Freeways and just south of the Anderson (105) Freeway.
Date of Incorporation September 11, 1930
General Law City 1955
Form of Government Council-Manager Form
County Los Angeles, Second Supervisorial District
State Representatives 62nd & 66th Assembly Districts
35th Senatorial District
U. S. Representative 43rd U.S. Congressional District
Area 5.9 Square Miles
Population 60,344
Dwellings 21,373
Police Protection 87 sworn personnel and 2 7 marked units, including 2 canine units.
Fire Protection City Fire Department services were
transferred to the Consolidated Fire
Protection District of Los Angeles County
and became a contract service in October
2000.
Recreation and Parks 6 parks (37.36 acres) including 2 with skate parks, 1 community center, 1 municipal pool,
1 parkette, and 2 gymnasiums.
GTrans 66 coaches and 8 demand response
vehicles for elderly and disabled
passengers.
19 (;ITY ff {;ARDEl(A
z•
Not To Scale
......
CX>
I\J
:::,
a.
WESTERN
GRAMERCY
)>
� m en
j;
OJr
NORMANDIE I c3
ij\�� � �
�\ VERMONT
'\
l
cl-
® -: "----W -I
AVE.
......
C1)
C1) -
::J"
en
:-i
LEGEND:
� G) City Hall Administration Offices and Campus
@ Police Headquarters
[] ® Sister-City Parkette
@ Vincent Bell Memorial Park
© Edward L. Thornburg Park
PL.
@ Fire Department Headquarters
I
Fire Station 2
Public Works Building and Maintenance Yard
Kiyoto "Ken" Nakaoka Community Center
Ernest J. Primm Memorial Pool and James Rush Gymnasium
@ George H. Freeman Memorial Park
@ Mas Fukai Park
® Paul A. Rowley Memorial Park
@ Arthur Lee Johnson Memorial Park
@ National Guard
® Gardena Transit Administration, Operations, & Maintenance Facility (NEW) �
i i 0
CRENSHAW BL\AD.
�� )> )>() zII
OJ �r -I< )>oz
............
01 01 .i,.. .i,.. - -::J" ::J"
"U CJ)
r- :-i
VAN NSSS
� ......
.i,..
)> %?� ::J"
z en m :-i
...... :;o ...... ......
.i,.. 0 (,.) (,.)
--.J en <D 01 - - -
::J" m ::J" ::J"
en () en en
� :-i :-i :-i
z en
AVE.
� J
......
(,.)
I\J
:::,
a.
en
:-i
2 en 9 ) I..... GRAMERCY PL.
®\ 4\ 1� WESTERN I I AVE.
HARVARD
i I @
::J" �
en -
:-i I '3
I�+.�
��[ill�
� 5 ; �m7
G)
I�)> :;o BRIGHTON
HALLDAUE AVE.
AVE.
mr
en m G) C z 0 0
0 fi
......
C1)
.i,.. -
BUDLONG ::J"
�
II
1 ' 1� 1j
i
,,,��s : BUDLONG �: :AVE
:
1 :�
en OJ :-ir
0 -
en
:-i
en :-1 OJ
< 0 \iERMONll AVE.
20 CITY FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES
City Hall Administrative Offices and Campus
1700 West 162nd Street
The Administrati ve Offices have approximately 25,975 square feet of building space, which includes City Council Chambers, a Council Chambers Conference Room, 32 administrative offices and 9 bathrooms.
The buildings were built in 1962; and in f iscal year 2001- 2002, the Administrative Office building was renovated with automatic sliding glass doors to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The campus lawn in front of City Hall was dedicated on June 12, 1982 , as the Lucille Randolph Plaza , in honor of the City Clerk w ho served the City for twenty-three years.
Police Headquarters
1718 West 162nd Street
The Police Headquarters has approximately 63,475 square feet of site area and approximately 23,690 square feet of building space that includes a one- story brick masonry police headquarters structure (Class C construction). Built in 196 3, the needs of the department have far outgrown the building’ s capacity. Separate modular units have been constructed in the parking lot , and on an adjacent property to serve as annex offices.
Fire Department Headquarters
1650 West 162nd Street
The Fire Department Headquarters has approximately 27,925 square feet of site area and approximately 17,975 square feet of building space, which includes a two- story brick masonry fire station building (Class C construction). The building was built in 1963 and is currently leased to the Los Angeles County Fire District. The City contracts with the Los Angeles County Fire District for the provision of fire services. Fire Station 2
2030 West 135th Street
Fire Station 2 has approximately 26,140 square feet of site area and approximately 5,949 square feet of building space, which includes a pre- cast concrete fire station structure. The fire station structure was built in 1957 and includes an apparatus garage, offices, kitchen, dining area, chief’s quarter
s, dormitory and training tower. The fire station structure is currently leased to the Los Angeles County Fire District. The City contracts with the Los Angeles County Fire District for the provision of fire services.
Public Works Building and Maintenance Yard
1717 West 162nd Street
The Public Works Building has approximately 11,825 square feet of building space, which includes 10 administrative offices and 5 bathrooms.
The buildings were built in 1968 and 1990; and in fiscal year 2003- 2004, the building was renovated with automatic sliding glass doors to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. In addition, a City yard is adjacent to the Public Works Building to create a total land area of 1.850 acres.
Kiyoto “Ken” Nakaoka Community Center
1670 West 162nd Street
The Community Center has approximately 17,137 square feet of building space, which includes 6 classrooms, 4 offices, a kitchen and an auditorium that can accommodate up to 280 people. The building was built in 1975 and dedicated June 7, 1975. O n December 13, 1989, an expansion was dedicated in honor of the first Japanese- American to be elected (1966) to a City Council position in the United States , and the first elected Mayor of the City. During fiscal year 2001- 2002, the Community Center was renovated with automatic sliding glass doors to comply wit h the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Located in the Nakaoka Community Center, the Lucien “Lou” Lauzon Memorial Auditorium was d edicated August 22, 1981, in honor of his active community support, which included serving as a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee and the Beautification Committee. Ernest J. Primm Memorial Pool and James Rush Gymnasium 1651 West 162nd Street
The pool and gymnasium have approximately 62,650 square feet of site area and approximately 19,623 square feet of building space, which includes a one- story masonry gymnasium (Class C construction). The building was built in 1979. The Human Services Division offices are 21 CITY FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES
located in th
is building. The roof of the g ymnasium was renovated in fiscal year 2002- 2003, and the administrative office of the g ymnasium was renovated with automatic sliding glass doors in f iscal year 2004-2005 to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The pool was de
dicated as the Ernest J. Primm Memorial Pool on April
22, 1962, in honor of the founder of the card clubs in Gardena. On June 30, 1979, the gymnasium was rededicated as the James Rush Memorial Gymnasium in honor of the former Councilmember and Mayor of Gardena (1942 – 1956). Mr. Rush was also involved in the planning of the civic center grounds.
The Army National Guard
2100 West 154th Street
A portion of
the former Municipal Transportation Facility, 1.72 acres , was sold for development of residential units in 2015. The remaining portion of the propert y is leased to the State of California for use as a National Guard post.
GTrans
13999 South Western Avenue
The new transit facility opened in May 2009, o n a 9.1-acre site that accommodates a fleet of 100 buses, plus p aratransit and support vehicles. The facility is designed as a “Green Building,” emphasizing energy efficiency and environmental sensitivity and includes solar panels for power generation, bus simulators for operator traini ng, and current technology in bus maintenance equipment.
The administration and operations building is approximately 24,000 square feet in area. The maintenance building is approximately 45,000 square feet with a 4,000 square foot bus-wash structure and 2,800 square foot fuel island. A photovoltaic panel shade structure provides covered parking.
CITY PARK FACILITIES
(A) Sister-City Parkette - 160th Street/Harvard Boulevard Sister-City Parkette was renamed in August 2013 from Harvard Parkette.
The Parkette was dedicated in November 1958 as a neighborhood play area, is 0.19 acre and includes a slide and jungle gym, swings, and lunch benches.
(B) Vincent Bell
Memorial Park - 14708 South Halldale Avenue
This 1.87-acre park was d edicated on May 26, 1972 , in honor of a City Councilman who died in office shortly after his election in 1970. The facility is equipped with a recreation room, baseball diamond, outdoor basketball court, handball court, two tiny tot play areas, two picnic shelters, and a police office.
(C) Edward L.
Thornburg Park - 2320 West 149th Street
The Edward L. Thornburg 2.39-acre park was n amed for the developer who donated the land in 1953. The facility is equipped with a recreation room, baseball diamond, two outdoor basketball courts, handb all court, tiny tot play area, picnic shelter, martial arts room, and horseshoe pit. (D) George H. Fr
eeman Memorial Park - 2100 West 154th Place
This 2.71-acre park was dedicated on April 11, 1957, in honor of George Freeman, who served as the first City Recreation Director. The park is equipped with two recreation rooms, a baseball diamond, basketball court, handball court, tennis court, tiny tot play area, picnic shelter, and police office.
(E) Mas Fukai Par
k - 15800 South Brighton Avenue
4.53 acres were purchased from the County and dedicated as a City park in 1960. In June 2000, the Gardena City Council rededicated Recreation Park as Mas Fukai Park. Masani “Mas” Fukai was elected to Council in 1974 and served until his retirement in 1998. Mas, as his friends and associates call him, also served for five years as the Chief Deputy to then Los Angeles County Supervisor Kenneth Hahn. The facility is equipped with three recreation rooms, three baseball diamonds, two basketball courts, a handball court, tiny tot play area, picnic shelter, and kitchen. 22 CITY FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES
(F) Paul A. Row
ley Memorial Park - 13220 South Van Ness Avenue
This 18.17-acre park was d edicated July 21, 1962, in honor of the first City Adm inistrative Officer, 1959 – 1962. Mr. Rowley died of a heart attack in June 1962, while addressing a public affair at the park. The park was originally named Van Ness Park, when it opened in 1959. The expansion of the park facilities, which included the addition of a gymnasium, was dedicated February 12, 1990. The facility is equipped with two recreation rooms, a gymnasium, four baseball diamonds, three outdoor basketball courts (one full and two half) , a skate park opened in March 2012, four tennis cour ts, two tiny tot play areas, three picnic shelters, a kitchen, auditorium, weight room, teen center, and police office.
(G) Arthur Lee
Johnson Memorial Park - 1200 West 170th Street
This 7.5-acre park, originally dedicated July 9, 1977 , as South Park, was rededicated on January 13, 2007 as Arthur Lee Johnson Memorial Park.
Arthur Johnson marched with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in the civil rights movement, founded the Gardena Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Cultural Committee, and served as its president for twenty years . In 1973, his efforts made G ardena the first city west of the Mississippi to honor Dr.
King’s birthday with an annual commemorative celebration. Mr. Johnson served as a Planning and Environmental Quality Commissioner for twelve years. His many years of community service earned him the Gardena Black History Month Trailblazer Award and a place on the City’s Wall of Fame.
The Arthur Lee Johnson Memorial Park is equipped with a recreation room, two basketball courts, a skate park opened in June 2012, four tennis courts, a tiny tot play area, picnic shelter, soccer field, police shooting range, and entrance to the Gardena Willows Wetland. 23 CITY OF GARDENA HISTORIC TIMELINE
1930 Incorporation of City of Gardena on September 11, 1930 with a population of approximately 3,000.
Annexation of Western City on November 12, 1930.
2001 Eldorado Parking COP liquidated through agreement with Hustler for a net principal gain of $980,000.
2013 February Standard & Poor's raised the City's credit rating to A. 1936 First legal card club license in the State of California to Gardena.
2002 Eliminated the General Fund deficit a year ahead of schedule with a positive $1,048,182 balance on June 30, 2002.
Sold parking structure located at 1041 Redondo Beach Blvd.
Entered into sales agreement for 1.72 acres at
15350 Van Ness Avenue. September 2014, Standard & Poor's raised the City's credit rating to A+
1940 City bus service began on January 15,1940. Voters approved an increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 11% in November.
2014 Closed escrow on 15350 Van Ness Ave (former GTrans facility). Adopted 2016-2021 Five Year Strategic Plan. Council approved updated comprehensive fee resolution.
1953 Gardena Municipal Bus Lines moved to new location on Van Ness Avenue in November.
2005 Celebrated 75th anniversary. 2015 Adopted 2016-2021 Five Year Strategic Plan. Council approved updated comprehensive fee resolution. Civic Center
1954 City adopted its official seal and slogan
"Freeway City" on October 26, 1954.
2006 City Council approved settlement agreement with Sumitomo Trust and Union Bank that would restructure the $26 million debt on the failed First Time Homebuyer Program and the
2016 Mitchell Lansdell City Manager retires, Ed Medrano appointed Acting City Manager. Refinancing of the 2006 C Bond Debt. Reassesment of the Sewer Fees to ensure sewer upkeep.
1955 Gardena was designated as a General Law City by action of the State Legislature.
December - City made a $2.6 million payment to Sumitomo Trust and Union Bank on the long-term $26 million debt
thereby ending the debt service obligation on both failed programs.
2017 Ed Medrano appointed as City Manager.
1964 Adopted City flag. 2007 Received investment grade credit ratings:
Standard & Poor's BBB rating
Moody's Baa3 rating
2019 Clint D. Osorio appointed as City Manager
1980 Received the All America City Award. Refinanced the South Bay Regional Communications Center debt at an improved interest rate.
2020 March 2020 Novel Coronavirus Pandemic - COVID 19, Stay-at- 1982 Maintenance facility added at the Gardena Municipal Bus Lines.
Adopted 5 Year Plan 2007 - 2012.
Home orders issued and City Hall closed to the public.
December 2020 Pension Obligation Bond issued to refinance City's UAL effecting savings of $51 million. City revises Strategic
Plan to address effects of COVID
1994 Council action limited the number of card clubs from six to two.
November 20, 2007 City Manager Mitchell G. Lansdell was awarded the Municipal Leader of the Year for his 10-year effort to lead the City out of financial crisis.
2021 Issuance and sale of Lease Revenue Bond to finance a portion of the cost of the Aquatic & Senior Center, the renovation of the Chase Bank building to a community center, and various park improvements.
1995 Annexation of El Camino Village. 2009 May 2009 Gardena Municipal Bus Lines moved to new facility.
Dec 2009 Standard & Poor's raised the City's rating to A-.
City is awarded an $8.5 million Prop 68 competitive grant as well as an $1.4 million appropriation for the Aquatic & Senior Center
1996 Employee committees formed to review revenues, operational efficiencies, and customer service. A fourth committee compiled the information for council consideration.
2010 June 30, 2010 General Fund reserves = $8,649,750 or 20%.
September 11, 2010, City will celebrate its 80th Anniversary with a population of approximately 61,927.
To reduce expenditures, Council implemented hiring freeze and a 2% decrease in appropriated expenditures for last six months of the fiscal year.
2011 April 1, 2011 UUT rate collection at the maximum of 5%.
Senior exemption eligibility reduced to age 60.
1998 Council committed to a plan to eliminate the projected $5 million General Fund deficit with a $1 million set aside for the next five years.
May 10, 2011 Council adopted new fee resolution with an effective date of July 11, 2011.
2000 The newest card club in the State, the Hustler, opened in June 2000.
September 2011, the City purchased the Goodwill property as well as property adjacent to the Police Department.
Ending General Fund balance June 30, 2000 = ($2,719,574). 2012 Created "Super-Departments" as a transitional phase for operational efficiency and cost containment during succession planning.
24 CITY OF GARDENA COMMISSIONS, CORPORATIONS, AGENCIES, BOARDS, ADVISORY GROUPS,
COMMITTEES AND ASSOCIATIONS
The Mayor and City Council appoint members to Commissions, Corporations, Agencies, Boards, etc. to advise the City on important programs and polic y decisions. Public participation, therefore, is a vital component of the City's governing system. In addition, there are other important Committee and Association members who meet on a regular basis but are not appointed by the Mayor and City Council. All of the meetings are open to the public.
APPOINTED COMMISSIONS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
Composed of five members, this Commission was created in compliance with the State Government Code as an advisory agency to the City Council on all matters of land use and the environment. Its responsibilities are to investigate and report on the design and improvement of adopted subdivisions, and to submit reports and recommendations to the City Council on matters relating to zoning, land use, environment, the City's General Plan, and other related matters.
RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION
This Commission is composed of five members who advise the Council on matters relating to recreation and parks within the City. The Commission considers, advises, and/or recommends to the City Council the needs of the City pertaining to the acquisition, development, and use of facilities, buildings and structures for recreational and park purposes; promotes public interest in recreation and parks programs and regulations; and consults and confers with public officials and agencies, citizens, civic, educational, professional, and other organizations.
SENIOR CITIZENS COMMISSION
This Commission is composed of five members, appointed by the City Council, who advise them on all matters relating to the needs and concerns of the City's older adult population. The Commission coordinates its activities with those of the Affiliated Committee on Aging.
HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
The Human Services Commission is composed of five members who are responsible for the development and utilization of available resources to meet needs within the City. The Mayor and each Councilmember appoint one member. The Commission advises the Council on all matters relating to social conditions within the City, assesses and reports to the Council the social needs of the citizenry, and advises the Human Services Division regarding policy and program direction for meeting such needs and making appropriate recommendations to the Council.
GARDENA YOUTH COMMISSION
The Youth Commission is composed of five members appointed by the City Council and five "at-large" members approved by the Commission and ratified by the City Council. The Commission identifies and evaluates youth and community issues and p rojects and makes recommendations to the City Council to resolve such issues. Commission members also work as volunteers with community groups, organizations, and Recreation and Human Services programs
APPOINTED CORPORATIONS / AGENCIES / BOARDS
CITY OF GARDENA FINANCING AGENCY
The Agency was created in July 1991 as a Joint Powers Authority between the City of Gardena and the Gardena Parking Authority. The Agency provides for financing of the acquisition, construction and improvement of Public Capital Improvements, for working capital requirements, and for liability or other insurance programs of the City and the Parking Authority.
BOARD OF APPEALS
This board is comprised of the members of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission, with the building official as an ex -officio member. The Board is governed by the same procedures as the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission. The Board determines the suitability of alternate materials and methods of construction and provides reasonable interpretations of the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. The Board also determines whether a building constitutes a menace to public safety, and whether repairs, alterations, or demolition are necessary to abate the menace to public safety.
RENT MEDIATION B
OARD
This fifteen-member Board is composed of five landlords, five tenants, and five members-at-large, all of whom are appointed by the City Council to assist citizens in mediating rental increase-related disputes. 25 HOUSING APPEALS BOARD
This Board, consisting of members of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission, is authorized by the City Council to hear all appeals relating to violations of housing standards and is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Housing Code. The Community Development Director serves as secretary to the Housing Appeals Board.
APPOINTED ADVISORY GROUPS
GARDENA ECONOMIC BUSINESS ADVISORY COUNCIL (GEBAC)
Established in May 2016, its mission is to promote economic opportunities by establishing and preserving a business and job friendly environment to attract and retain businesses, industry and commerce, that will enhance Gardena’s economic viability, financial stability, and improve the overall quality of life of its residents. GEBAC has the following goals:
• Promote new business development opportunities;
• Strengthen the relationship between the City and the business community;
• Support retention and attraction of diversified tax base for the long - term viability of the City;
• Provide support on issues affecting the economy an d quality of life in the City
• Review City business practices and programs to ensure the City of Gardena remains business friendly
The Council consists of eleven members from the business community within the City of Gardena. GEBAC meets the 3
rd Wednesday of odd
months at 4:00 p.m.
GARDENA BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
This Committee has a maximum of nine voting members who study and make recommendations to the City Council relating to the beautification and livability of all areas of the City of Gardena. The Chairperson is a member of the City Council. Five of the members are appointed by the City Council, and the remaining three at-large members are nominated by the Committee Chair and ratified by City Council. Committee projects include elimination of graffiti , beautification of streets and parkways; tree planting, and other related activities.
NON-APPOINTED COMMITTEES / ASSOCIATIONS:
GARDENA VALLEY AFFILIATED COMMITTEE ON AGING
The Gardena Valley Affiliated Committee on Aging is composed of a five- member board of directors and members at large, who assist and coordinate the work of community organizations, government agencies, and private entities concerned with the betterment of living conditions for the aging. They coordinat e events, activities and programs into a unified approach that will meet the economic and social needs of the elderly, and those in need of assistance throughout the greater Gardena community.
The committee advises the Gardena Senior’s Bureau and the Gardena Senior Citizen’s Commission on all matters relating to the needs and concerns of the City’s older adult population.
GARDENA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION
The Gardena Sister City Association, comprised of community volunteers, has been active in promoting international friendship for over f ive decades. The program's goal is to learn more about the community, enjoy the hospitality, and build personal contacts with other cultures. This is done through adult and youth exchange programs that encourage person-to-person visitations in each city. Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan has been an official Sister City to Gardena since 1962 and Huatabampo, Sonora, Mexico , since 1973. Gardena has also maintained an unofficial mutual friendship with Rosarito, Baja, California, Mexico for many years.
GARDENA POLICE FOUNDATION
The Gardena Police Foundation is a partnership of citizens, businesses, and philanthropic organizations whose mission is to provide additional resources to improve public safety. Incorporated in September 2006 as an independent 501(c)3 non- profit organization, the Foundation relies solely on donations and fundraising efforts. The Board of Directors actively raises money from the community and awards grants directly to the police department in response to the department’s request for program, training and equipment needs not included in the City’s budget.
GARDENA TRAFFIC COMMITTEE
The City Traffic Committee is composed of City staff persons, incl uding the Chief of Police; Recreation, Human Services, Parks, & Facilities Director; and the Transportation Director. This Committee advises the City concerning traffic-related matters including, but not limited to, parking, stop signs, signals, and congestion, etc.
GARDENA RECREATION AND SPORTS ADVISORY BOARD
The Gardena Sports Advisory Board is made up of volunteers from the Community, who raise funds to assist the Recreation Department Sports Programs in providing participation scholarships to the low -income, as approved by Human Services , providing equipment and making repairs to City sports facilities as funds allow. They work to recognize the coaches that take the time to work with the youth of Gardena and serve as a review board to rule on second stage protests and coaching discipline matters. 26 PROPOSED
BUDGET SUMMARIES
FY 2022/2023 & 2023/2024
27 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
28 Revenue Sources General Fund % of Total Department Expenditures General Fund % of Total Sales and Use Tax 25,165,183$ 32.83% 32,878,497$ 42.91% Card C
lub Gross Revenue Fees 8,840,000$ 11.53% 6,509,050 8.50% Property
Tax 8,965,773$ 11.70% 13,501,048 17.62%
Vehicle
License Fees 7,509,721$ 9.80% 4,436,453 5.79%
Utility
Users Tax 4,902,643$ 6.40% 2,519,383 3.29%
Business
License Tax 2,677,500$ 3.49% 2,631,900 3.44%
Franchis
e and Other Taxes 4,714,425$ 6.15% 2,490,589 3.25%
License and
Permits 1,875,038$ 2.45%
Police
Public Works
Non-Departmental including Fire and RCC
Recreation & Human Services
Community Development
Elected and City Manager's Offices
Administrativ
e Services
Transfers Out 11,649,841 15.21%
Fines and Forfetuires 1,185,368$ 1.55% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 76,616,761$ 100.00% Investment Income 330,000$ 0.43%
Intergovernmental 532,500$ 0.69%
Current Service Charge 2,506,467$ 3.27%
Other Revenue 512,036$ 0.67%
Transfer In 4,239,000$ 5.53%
Charges to Other Funds 2,698,115$ 3.52%
TOTAL REVENUES 76,653,769$ 100.00%
GENERAL FUND REVENUE and EXPENDITURES 2022/2023
WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM… WHERE THE MONEY GOES…
Police, 42.91%Public Works,
8.50%
Non-Departmental
including Fire and
RCC, 17.62%
Recreation &
Human Services,
5.79%
Community
Development,
3.29%
Elected and City
Manager's Office,
3.44%
Administra
tive
Services, 3.25%
Transfers Out,
15.21%
Sales and Use Tax,
32.83%
Card Club Gross
Revenue Fees,
11.53%
Property Tax,
11.70%
Vehicle License Fees,
9.80%
Utility Users Tax,
6.40%
Business License
Tax, 3.49%Franchise and Other
Taxes, 6.15%
License and Permits,
2.45%
Fines and
Forfetuires, 1.55%
Investment
Income,
0.43%
Intergovernmental,
0.69%
Current Service
Charge, 3.27%
Other Revenue,
0.67%
Transfer In, 5.53%
Charges to Other
Funds, 3.52%
Other, 14.11%
29 Revenue Sources General Fund % of Total Department Expenditures General Fund % of Total Sales and Use Tax 25,623,576$ 33.02% 34,309,188$ 44.24% Card Cl
ub Gross Revenue Fees 9,193,600$ 11.85% 6,656,917 8.58% Property
Tax 9,234,746$ 11.90% 14,640,514 18.88%
Vehicle Li
cense Fees 7,659,916$ 9.87% 4,929,066 6.36%
Utility Use
rs Tax 4,929,272$ 6.35% 2,537,141 3.27%
Business
License Tax 2,811,375$ 3.62% 2,841,708 3.66%
Franchis
e and Other Taxes 4,879,429$ 6.29% 2,672,264 3.45% License and Per
mits 1,968,790$ 2.54%
Police
Public Works
Non-Departm
ental including Fire and RCC
Recreation & Human Services
Community Development
Elected and City Manager's Offices
Administrative Services
Transfers Out 8,967,671 11.56%
Fines and Forfetuires 1,220,929$ 1.57% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 77,554,469$ 100.00% Investment Income 355,000$ 0.46%
Intergovernmental 537,500$ 0.69%
Current Service Charge 2,377,600$ 3.06%
Other Revenue 512,036$ 0.66%
Transfer In 3,587,448$ 4.62%
Charges to Other Funds 2,702,388$ 3.48%
TOTAL REVENUES 77,593,605$ 100.00%
GENERAL FUND REVENUE and EXPENDITURES 2023/2024
WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM… WHERE THE MONEY GOES…
Police, 44.24%Public Works,
8.58%
Non-Departmental
including Fire and
RCC, 18.88%
Recreation &
Human Services,
6.36%
Community
Development,
3.27%
Elected and
City Manager's
Offices, 3.66% Administra
tive
Services, 3.45%
Transfers Out,
11.56%
Sales and Use Tax,
33.02%
Card Club Gross
Revenue Fees,
11.85%
Property Tax,
11.90%
Vehicle License Fees,
9.87%
Utility Users Tax,
6.35%
Business License
Tax, 3.62%
Franchise and Other
Taxes, 6.29%
License and Permits,
2.54%
Fines and
Forfetuires, 1.57%
Investment
Income,
0.46%
Intergovernmental,
0.69%
Current Service
Charge, 3.06%
Other Revenue,
0.66%
Transfer In, 4.62%
Charges to Other
Funds, 3.48%
Other, 12.98%
30 Revenues and Other Sources:
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Change in %
Proposed 2023-24 vs
Proposed 2022-23
Taxes 54,483,563 55,741,766 62,775,245 64,331,914 2.48% Licenses and Permits 2,397,538 1,779,976 1,875,038 1,968,790 5.00% Fines and Forfeitures 1,038,080 980,000 1,185,368 1,220,929 3.00% Investment Income (185,053) 255,000 330,000 355,000 7.58% Intergovernmental 547,901 577,500 532,500 537,500 0.94% Current Service Charges 2,401,917 2,268,298 2,506,467 2,377,600 -5.14% Other Revenue 492,320 512,036 512,036 512,036 0.00%
Charges to Other Funds 2,674,733 2,707,439 2,698,115 2,702,388 0.16% Transfer In 9,505,011 2,098,821 4,239,000 3,587,448 -15.37% Total Revenues 73,356,010 66,920,836 76,653,769 77,593,605 1.23% Expenditures:
Salaries and Benefits 32,094,341 37,085,479 42,894,296 46,695,443 8.86% Materials and Operations 16,816,978 18,572,196 21,902,370 21,741,101 -0.74% Capital Outlay 318,055 319,804 170,254 150,254 -11.75%
Fund Transfers 9,863,925 10,887,862 11,649,841 8,967,671 -23.02% Total Expenditures 59,093,299 66,865,341 76,616,761 77,554,469 1.22% Net Change in General Fund Fund Balance 14,262,711 55,495 37,008 39,136 Fund Balances - Beginning 10,693,492 24,956,203 25,011,698 25,048,706 0.15% Fund Balances - Ending* 24,956,203 25,011,698 25,048,706 25,087,842 0.30% * Fund 010 only
GENERAL FUND HISTORICAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 31 GENERAL FUND
BALANCE
$15.8
$20.9
$23.9 $23.9
$16.5
$10.6
$25.0
$32.0 $32.0 $32.1
31%
39%
44%
43%
27%
17%
42%
45%
42%
41%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
$0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0
$30.0
$35.0
June 2015 June 2016 June 2017 June 2018 June 2019 June 2020 June 2021 Projected June 2022
Proposed
June 2023
Proposed
June 2024
In Million USD
City established a 25% General
Fund Reserve Policy
32 GENERAL FUND TOP 5
REVENUES
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 Audited
2019-20 Audited
2020-21 Projected
2021-22 Proposed
2022-23 Proposed
2023-24
Sales & Use Tax $
25.6 M
33 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024
Audited Adopted Proposed Proposed
TAXES (001)
3101-3105 Property Taxes 8,760,400$ 8,704,633$ 8,965,773$ 9,234,746$ 3106 Sales and Use Tax 22,825,090$ 20,191,841$ 25,165,183$ 25,623,576$ 3107-09, 3112-13 Franchise Taxes 2,025,517$ 2,115,000$ 2,164,425$ 2,240,000$ 3110 Documentary Stamp Tax 285,357$ 275,000$ 290,000$ 295,000$ 3115-3116 Business License Tax 2,508,287$ 2,550,000$ 2,677,500$ 2,811,375$ 3117 Card Club Gross Revenue Fees 4,154,913$ 7,500,000$ 8,840,000$ 9,193,600$ 3118 Utility Users Tax 4,970,799$ 4,877,820$ 4,902,643$ 4,929,272$ 3119 Franchise Utility 849,606$ 825,000$ 870,000$ 884,429$ 3121 Hotel/Motel Tax 940,637$ 1,300,000$ 1,350,000$ 1,420,000$ 3122, 3349 Property Tax - Homeowner Tax Relief 38,964$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 3345 Motor Vehicle License In-Lieu 44,693$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 3346-3348 Vehicle License/Licenses In-Lieu 7,079,299$ 7,322,472$ 7,469,721$ 7,619,916$ TOTAL TAXES 54,483,563$ 55,741,766$ 62,775,245$ 64,331,914$ LICENSES & PERMITS (002)
3218-3220 Special and Entertainment Permits 139,011$ 150,000$ 157,500$ 165,375$ 3222-3232 Building and Other Permits 2,189,274$ 1,569,950$ 1,654,511$ 1,737,236$ 3234-3235 Appeals and Administration Fees 61,253$ 60,026$ 63,028$ 66,179$ 3473 Fireworks and Regulatory Fees 8,000$ -$ -$ -$
TOTAL LICENSES and PERMITS 2,397,538$ 1,779,976$ 1,875,038$ 1,968,790$ FINES & FORFEITURES (003)
3533-3535 Administrative Citation and Parking Fines 1,027,870$ 950,000$ 1,155,368$ 1,190,929$ 3536-3538 Court Fines 10,210$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ TOTAL FINES and FORFEITURES 1,038,080$ 980,000$ 1,185,368$ 1,220,929$ INVESTMENT INCOME (004)
3640 Interest on Investments 69,965$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 175,000$ 3641-3644 Rents and Concessions 33,997$ 55,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 3645 Fair Market Value on Investments (289,015)$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 3646 Other Investment Income -$ -$ -$
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME (185,053)$ 255,000$ 330,000$ 355,000$ FROM OTHER AGENCIES (005/006/007)
3311 Public Safety Augmentation 405,779$ 410,000$ 415,000$ 420,000$ 3375-3376 STC Reimbursement/POST Reimbursement 19,496$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 3378 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 32,494$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 3383-88,3772,3391 Other Reimbursements 90,132$ 135,500$ 85,500$ 85,500$ TOTAL FROM OTHER AGENCIES 547,901$ 577,500$ 532,500$ 537,500$ Revenue Sources
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY ACCOUNT
FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON
FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2021-2024
34 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024
Audited Adopted Proposed ProposedRevenue Sources
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY ACCOUNT
FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON
FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2021-2024
CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES (008)
3401-3402 Public Service Impact/Development Fees 156,000$ 32,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 3403 Business Registration Fee 1,846$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 3406 Trucking Impact Fee 2,026$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 3407 ATM Commission 20$ -$ -$ -$
3409 Passport Fees -$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$
3411 Tipping Fees - CDS Refuse 187,210$ 180,000$ 190,000$ 190,000$ 3404, 3418-31, 3470 Recreation Fees 81,006$ 254,683$ 326,500$ 331,500$ 3433-3435 Industrial Waste/Strong Motion/Runoff Fees 287,626$ 210,000$ 220,000$ 220,000$ 3450-3452 Planning - Fees 529,572$ 570,000$ 680,167$ 530,000$ 3453-3459 Miscellaneous Fees (Public Works) 51,150$ 55,800$ 55,800$ 55,800$ 3466 Sewer Connection Fees 38,116$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 3475 Police Towing Admin Fees 109,983$ 120,000$ 126,000$ 132,300$ 3491 Police Services Bus Lines 388,113$ 386,345$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 3462, 3482 Miscellaneous Fees (Police Department) 52,297$ 61,256$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 3405, 3432-38, 3463-90 Other 284,216$ 116,214$ 141,000$ 141,000$ 3492 Franchise - Admin Fees (AB939) 232,736$ 230,000$ 240,000$ 250,000$ TOTAL CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 2,401,917$ 2,268,298$ 2,506,467$ 2,377,600$ OTHER REVENUE (009)
3701 Franchise - Community Support 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 3770 Sale of Real or Personal Property 3,492$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 3705,3771-3787, 3789 Miscellaneous 113,814$ 102,036$ 152,036$ 152,036$ 3760, 3791 CIP and Engineering Costs Reimbursed 325,014$ 350,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 3901-3902 Prior Year Adjustments/Stale Checks -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 492,320$ 512,036$ 512,036$ 512,036$ 61,176,266$ 62,114,576$ 69,716,654$ 71,303,769$ CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS (084) 2,674,733$ 2,707,439$ 2,698,115$ 2,702,388$ FUNDS TRANSFERRED IN (089) 9,505,011$ 2,098,821$ 4,239,000$ 3,587,448$ .
73,356,011$ 66,920,836$ 76,653,769$ 77,593,605$
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
35 FUND DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
REVENUES IN REVENUES EXPENDITURES OUT EXPENDITURES
General 72,414,769$ 4,239,000$ 76,653,769$ 64,966,920$ 11,649,841$ 76,616,761$ General Fund 72,414,769 4,239,000 76,653,769 64,966,920 11,649,841 76,616,761 General Liability 1,913,564 2,236,852 4,150,416 2,650,414 - 2,650,414 Workers' Compensation 1,818,400 550,000 2,368,400 2,217,890 - 2,217,890 Health Benefits 10,116,768 - 10,116,768 8,445,957 1,636,852 10,082,809 Combined Internal Services Fund 13,848,732 2,786,852 16,635,584 13,314,261 1,636,852 14,951,113 Debt Service - 2006 Series A & B Refunding - 1,026,340 1,026,340 1,026,340 - 1,026,340 Debt Service - 2014 Taxable Lease Rev Ref Bonds - 506,011 506,011 506,011 - 506,011 Debt Service - 2007A Refunding Rev Bonds - 188,545 188,545 188,545 - 188,545 Debt Service - 2017 Lease Financing - 288,798 288,798 288,798 - 288,798 Debt Service - Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds 2020 5,153,063 2,500 5,155,563 5,155,563 - 5,155,563 Debt Service - Lease Revenue Bonds, 2021 6,020,000 940,500 6,960,500 940,500 6,020,000 6,960,500 Combined Debt Service 11,173,063 2,952,694 14,125,757 8,105,757 6,020,000 14,125,757 Capital Improvements - 40,504,947 40,504,947 40,504,947 - 40,504,947 GTrans 29,599,945 5,837,096 35,437,041 35,308,591 128,450 35,437,041 Sewer Fund 2,660,000 - 2,660,000 1,586,058 840,962 2,427,020 Combined Enterprise Funds 32,259,945 5,837,096 38,097,041 36,894,649 969,412 37,864,061 Equipment Revolving - - - - - -
Technology Replacement 203,141 500,000 703,141 208,000 - 208,000 Deferred Maintenance - 2,000,000 2,000,000
- 704,000 704,000
Post Employement Benefits Fund - 3,223,920 3,223,920 2,968,560 - 2,968,560 Vehicle Replacement Fund - 650,000 650,000 550,000 - 550,000 Measure H Homeless Initiative 110,000 - 110,000 110,000 - 110,000 Asset Seizure Fund-Non Federal - - - - - - Consolidated Street Lighting District 839,045 - 839,045 789,045 300,000 1,089, 045 Artesia Blvd. Landscape District 21,662 - 21,662 21,662 - 21,662 State Gas Tax 1,752,022 - 1,752,022 580,800 1,235,000 1,815,800 Maxine Waters Federal Earmark 1,400,000 - 1,400,000 - 1,400,000 1,400,000 Supplement Law Enforcement (SLESF) 150,000 - 150,000 150,000 - 150,000 Traffic Safety Fund 75,500 - 75,500 - 75,500 75,500
SUMMARY OF FUND ACTIVITY
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
36 FUND DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
REVENUES IN REVENUES EXPENDITURES OUT EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY OF FUND ACTIVITY
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
Asset Forfeiture Fund - - - - - -
Measure W Safe Clean Water Program 830,500 - 830,500 554,000 710,000 1,264,000 Surface Trans Program Local Hazard Grant 1,547,800 - 1,547,800 - 1,547,800 1,547,800 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program 56,814 - 56,814 - 136,000 136,000 Local Early Action Planning Grants 300,000 - 300,000 200,000 - 200,000 Measure M Transit 2,864,928 - 2,864,928 - 2,864,928 2,864,928 GTrans OPEB Trust 150,000 - 150,000 - - -
City OPEB Trust Fund - 600,000 600,000 - - - Measure R Transit 2,872,168 - 2,872,168 - 2,872,168 2,872,168 Prop A Local Return 1,491,878 - 1,491,878 1,491,878 - 1,491,878 Prop 1B Capital - - - - - -
Prop 1B Security 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000
AQMD - MSRC - - - - - -
Park
s and Recreation Urban Park Grant - - - - - - Measure A 1,750,000 - 1,750,000 - 1,750,000 1,750,000 South Coast AQMD 80,500 - 80,500 77,000 3,500 80,500 Prop C Local Return 1,241,151 - 1,241,151 37,947 4,050,000 4,087,947 Prop 68 State Parks Grant 8,715,103 - 8,715,103 - 8,715,103 8,715,103 Measure R Highway 3,658,267 - 3,658,267 - 3,658,267 3,658,267 Measure R Local Return 917,863 - 917,863 37,946 1, 150,000 1,187,946
In Lieu Funds 220,000 - 220,000 - 1,654,730 1,654,730 Measure M Local Return 1,057,978 - 1,057,978 26,305 1,470,000 1,496,305 SB 1- Gas Tax 1,395,521 - 1,395,521 - 4,293,047 4,293,047 SB 2 Planning Grants Program 310,000 - 310,000 100,000 - 100,000 American Rescue Plan (ARP) 2,300,000 - 2,300,000 - 2,300,000 2,300, 000 Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) Fund - 468,948 468,948 - - - Measure M Highway 2,736,000 - 2,736,000 - 2,736,000 2,736,000 UAL Fund - GTrans - 128,450 128,450 - - -
UAL Fund - Sewer - 5,962 5,962 - - - SCAMP 273,000 - 273,000 273,000 - 273,000 SCAMP - Home Delivery 219,000 - 219,000 219,000 - 219,000 37 FUND DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
REVENUES IN REVENUES EXPENDITURES OUT EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY OF FUND ACTIVITY
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
Supportive Services Program 119,000 - 119,000 119,000 - 119,000 Social Center for Mentally Disabled - 30,255 30,255 30,255 - 30,255 Senior Citizen Day Care - Trust - 65,159 65,159 65,159 - 65,159 Family Child Care 3,598,052 - 3,598,052 3,598,052 - 3,598,052 Family Child Care CRRSA - - - 5,610 - 5,610 Juvenile Justice & Intervention Program - - - - - - Prop 56 - Tobacco Grant Program - - - - - - BJA BYRNE Discretionary Grant 26,126 - 26,126 26,126 - 26,126 BJA Coronavirus Emergency Supp Funding - - - - - - ABC Local Law Enforcement Agencies Prog. - - - - - - State Homeland Security Grant Program - - - - - - OTS DUI Enforcement Awareness Program 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 HOME ARP 1,040,280 - 1,040,280 1,040,280 - 1,040,280 CDBG Admin 119,355 - 119,355 119,355 - 119,355 CDBG Handyman Fixup Program 238,710 - 238,710 238,710 - 238,710 CDBG Health and Saftey Code Enforcement 156,000 - 156,000 156,000 - 156,000 CDBG CV 380,000 - 380,000 380,000 - 380,000 CDBG Youth and Family Services Bureau 85,936 8,865 94,801 94,801 - 94,801 CDBG Senior Citizen Day Care Center - - - - - - Combined Special Revenue Funds 45,503,300 7,681,559 53,184, 859 14,368,491 43,726,043 58,094,534
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 175,199,809$ 64,002,148$ 239,201,957$ 178,155,025$ 64,002,148$ 242,157,173$ 38 FUND DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
REVENUES IN REVENUES EXPENDITURES OUT EXPENDITURES
General 74,006,157$ 3,587,448$ 77,593,605$ 68,586,798$ 8,967,671$ 77,554,469$ General Fund 74,006,157 3,587,448 77,593,605 68,586,798 8,967,671 77,554,469 General Liability 1,359,585 1,186,852 2,546,437 2,736,135 - 2,736,135 Workers' Compensation 1,476,306 500,000 1,976,306 2,279,683 - 2,279,683 Health Benefits 11,005,643 - 11,005,643 9,287,373 1,786,852 11,074,225 Combined Internal Services Fund 13,841,534 1,686,852 15,528,386 14,303,191 1,786,852 16,090,043 Debt Service - 2006 Series A & B Refunding - 1,025,189 1,025,189 1,025,189 - 1,025,189 Debt Service - 2014 Taxable Lease Rev Ref Bonds - 508,444 508,444 508,444 - 508,444 Debt Service - 2007A Refunding Rev Bonds - 187,545 187,545 187,545 - 187,545 Debt Service - 2017 Lease Financing - 287,950 287,950 287,950 - 287,950 Debt Service - Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds 2020 5,541,063 2,500 5,543,563 5,543,563 - 5,543,563 Debt Service - Lease Revenue Bonds, 2021 5,000,000 943,500 5,943,500 943,500 5,000,000 5,943,500 Combined Debt Service 10,541,063 2,955,128 13,496,191 7,552,691 5,000,000 13,496,191 Capital Improvements - 15,792,000 15,792,000 15,792,000 - 15,792,000 GTrans 43,334,439 6,434,096 49,768,535 49,638,864 129,671 49,768,535 Sewer Fund 2,686,450 - 2,686,450 1,656,153 391,019 2,047,172 Combined Enterprise Funds 46,020,889 6,434,096 52,454,985 51,295,017 520,690 51,815,707 Equipment Revolving - - - - - -
Technology Replacement 203,141 150,000 353,141 114,000 - 114,000 Deferred Maintenance - 650,000 650,000 - -
-
Post Employement Benefits Fund - 3,483,749 3,483,749 3,206,046 3,206,046 Vehicle Replacement Fund - 650,000 650,000 550,000 550,000 Measure H Homeless Initiative 68,883 68,883 68,883 68,883 Asset Seizure Fund-Non Federal - - - -
Consolidated Street Lighting District 864,141 864,141 814,141 50,000 864,141 Artesia Blvd. Landscape District 21,662 21,662 21,662 21,662 State Gas T
ax 1,752,022 1,752,022 590,597 1,150,000 1,740,597 Maxine Waters Federal Earmark - - -
Supplement Law Enforcement (SLESF) 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Traffic Safety Fund 75,500 75,500 75,500 75,500
SUMMARY OF FUND ACTIVITY
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
39 FUND DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
REVENUES IN REVENUES EXPENDITURES OUT EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY OF FUND ACTIVITY
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
Asset Forfeiture Fund - - - -
Measure W Safe Clean Water Program 830,500 830,500 554,000 400,000 954,000 Surface Trans Program Local Hazard Grant - - - - Bicycle and Pedestrian Program 40,000 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 Local Early Action Planning Grants - - - - Measure M Transit 2,864,928 2,864,928 - 2,864,928 2,864,928 GTrans OPEB Trust 200,000 200,000 - -
City OPEB Trust Fund - 600,000 600,000 - -
Measure R Transit 2,872,168 2,872,168 - 2,872,168 2,872,168 Prop A Local Return 1,507,058 1,507,058 1,507,058 1,507,058 Prop 1B Capital 697,000 697,000 697,000 697,000 Prop 1B Security - - -
AQMD - MSRC - - 50,000 50,000
Parks and Recreation Urban Park Grant - - - - Measure A 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000
South Coast AQMD 80,500 80,500 77,000 3,500 80,500 Prop C Local Return 1,241,151 1,241,151 41,228 1,050,000 1, 091,228 Prop 68 State Parks Grant - - -
Measure R Highway - - -
Measure R Local Return 917,863 917,863 41,228 750,000 791,228 In Lieu Funds 810,000 810,000 3,500,000 3,500,000
Measure M Local Return 1,057,978 1,057,978 28,329 950,000 978,329 SB 1- Gas Tax 1,395,521 1,395,521 1,375,000 1,375,000 SB 2 Planning Grants Program - - -
American Rescue Plan (ARP) 1,648,448 1,648,448 1,648,448 1,648,448 Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) Fund 466,957 466,957 - Measure M Highw
ay 2,627,000 2,627,000 2,627,000 2,627,000 UAL Fund - GTrans - 129,671 129,671 -
UAL Fund - Sewer - 6,019 6,019 -
SCAMP 280,376 280,376 280,376 280,376
SCAMP - Home Delivery 219,000 219,000 219,000 219,000 40 FUND DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
REVENUES IN REVENUES EXPENDITURES OUT EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY OF FUND ACTIVITY
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
Supportive Services Program 119,000 119,000 119,000 119,000 Social Center for Mentally Disabled 32,784 32,784 32,784 32,784 Senior Citizen Day Care - Trust 250 67,216 67,466 67,466 67,466 Family Child Care 3,669,933 3,669,933 3,669,933 3,669,933 Family Child Care CRRSA - - -
Juvenile Justice & Intervention Program - - - Prop 56 - Tobacco Grant Program - - -
BJA BYRNE Discretionary Grant 26,126 26,126 26,126 26,126 BJA Coronavirus Emergency Supp Funding - - - ABC Local Law Enforcement Agencies Prog. - -
State Homeland Security Grant Program - -
OTS DUI Enforcement Awareness Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 CDBG Admin 119,355 119,355 119,355 119,355
CDBG Handyman Fixup Program 238,710 238,710 238,710 238,710 CDBG Health and Saftey Code Enforcement 156,000 156,000 156,000 156,000 CDBG Youth and Family Services Bureau 85,936 11,837 97,773 97,773 97,773 CDBG Senior Citizen Day Care Center - - - - - - Combined Special Revenue Funds 27,315,150 6,248,233 33,563,383 12,940,695 20,428,544 33,369,239 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 171,724,793$ 36,703,757$ 208, 428,550$ 170,470,392$ 36,703,757$ 208,117,649$ 41 Fund Description Revenues Expenditures Delta
General Fund $76,653,769 $76,616,761 $37,008
Combined Internal Services $16,635,584 $14,951,113 $1,684,471 Combined Debt Service $14,125,757 $14,125,757 $0
Capital Improvement (CIP) $40,504,947 $40,504,947 $0
Combined Enterprise Funds
- Transportation $35,437,041 $35,437,041 $0
Combined Enterprise Funds
- Sewer $2,660,000 $2,427,020 $232,980
Special Revenue Funds $53,184,859 $58,094,534 ($4,909,675) Total All Funds
- not including beginning fund balance $239,201,957 $242,157,173 ($2,955,216)
SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 PROPOSED BUDGET - ALL FUNDS
A " structurally balanced budget " projects revenues to exceed expenditure appropriations within the term of the budget.
The City's fiscal year (term) is from July 1 - June 30 so expenditure appropriations must be made within revenue projections. The variance between revenue and expenditures is referred to as the "delta" (^) and may be positive, reflecting a structurally balanced budget, or negative, indicating a structural imbalance. A structural imbalance is normally the result of the revenue being received in a prior fiscal year. When a positive delta exists at the end of a fiscal year, revenues may be appropriated to expend in the next fiscal year or may be set aside as a reserve to be used for an emergency or one-time opportunities. Fund balance reserves are not intended to offset normal operating cost or to balance an unstructured budget. The General Fund is the only fund that is totally discretionary and therefore must balance a negative delta in any fund; conversely other funds may not be used to balance a negative delta in the General Fund. 42 Fund Description Revenues Expenditures Delta
General Fund $77,593,605 $77,554,469 $39,136
Combined Internal Services $15,528,386 $16,090,043 ($561,657) Combined Debt Service $13,496,191 $13,496,191 $0
Capital Improvement (CIP) $15,792,000 $15,792,000 $0
Combined Enterprise Funds
- Transportation $49,768,535 $49,768,535 $0
Combined Enterprise Funds
- Sewer $2,686,450 $2,047,172 $639,278
Special Revenue Funds $33,563,383 $33,369,239 $194,144
Total All Funds
- not including beginning fund balance $208,428,550 $208,117,649 $310,901
SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 PROPOSED BUDGET - ALL FUNDS
A " structurally balanced budget " projects revenues to exceed expenditure appropriations within the term of the budget.
The City's fiscal year (term) is from July 1 - June 30 so expenditure appropriations must be made within revenue projections. The variance between revenue and expenditures is referred to as the "delta" (^) and may be positive, reflecting a structurally balanced budget, or negative, indicating a structural imbalance. A structural imbalance is normally the result of the revenue being received in a prior fiscal year. When a positive delta exists at the end of a fiscal year, revenues may be appropriated to expend in the next fiscal year or may be set aside as a reserve to be used for an emergency or one-time opportunities. Fund balance reserves are not intended to offset normal operating cost or to balance an unstructured budget. The General Fund is the only fund that is totally discretionary and therefore must balance a negative delta in any fund; conversely other funds may not be used to balance a negative delta in the General Fund. 43 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
44 DEPARTMENT
PROPOSED BUDGETS
FY 2022/2023 & 2023/2024
45 OPERATIONAL DEPARTMENTS
ELECTED & CITY MANAGER'S OFFICES
Administrative
Services
Police
Recreation &
Human Services
GTrans
CITIZENS OF GARDENA
Public Works
Community
Development
46 CITY CLERK
•Maintaining records and
updating Municipal Code
•Provides resources to the
public and City staff
•Publication and posting of
ordinances, meetings, and
other legal notices
CITY MANAGER
•Appoint all department heads
and supervise the operation of
all City departments.
•Implementing Mayor and City
Council’s policy decisions and
objectives.
•Prepare and observe the municipal
budget and make recommendations
to the City Council.
CITY TREASURER
•Performs an oversight role
of the investing of all public
funds
•Advises the City Council
with regard to investment
policies and oversight
•Provides centralized
cashiering system services
for all City departments
ELECTED &
CITY MANAGER'S
OFFICES
City of Gardena
•Legislative body for the City of
Gardena and serve on various
committees, commissions, and boards
•Provides policy and operational
direction to the City Manager
•Establishes City services and service
levels; tax rates, fees, assessments,-
and other revenue as set forth by the
Gardena Municipal Code
CITY COUNCIL
J. Ingrid Tsukiyama
City Treasurer
Art Kaskanian
Councilmember
Mark E. Henderson Ed. D
Councilmember
Rodney G. Tanaka
Mayor Pro Tem
Tasha Cerda
Mayor
Paulette C. Francis
Councilmember
Mina Semenza
City Clerk
Clint Osorio
City Manager
47 Appointed City Manager
Chief Executive Officer
CLINT D. OSORIO
ELECTED MAYOR
TASHA CERDA
ELECTED CITY COUNCIL
RODNEY G. TANAKA
MARK E. HENDERSON
ART KASKANIAN
PAULETTE FRANCIS
ELECTED CITY CLERK
MINA SEMENZA
APPOINTED DEPUTY CITY CLERK
PUBLIC RECORDS & ELECTIONS
ELECTED CITY TREASURER
J. INGRID TSUKIYAMA
APPOINTED DEPUTY CITY TREASURER
PUBLIC FUNDS/INVESTMENTS
APPOINTED COMMISSIONS, BOARDS
& COMMITTEES
Administrative Support Provided by
Appropriate Operating Department
Appointed City Attorney
Contracted Legal Services
CARMEN VASQUEZ
CITIZENS OF GARDENA
ELECTED & CITY MANAGER'S OFFICES
RENT MEDIATION BOARD
48 ELECTED & CITY MANAGER'S OFFICES
Staffing Plan
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OFFICE
Elected Mayor (1) - - - - - -
Elected Councilperson (4) - - - - - -
Executive Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Mayor/Council Office 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Elected City Clerk (1) - - - - - -
Appointed Deputy City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Records Management Coordinator - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Customer Service Clerk II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Customer Service Clerk I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total City Clerk's Office 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
CITY TREASURER'S OFFICE
Elected City Treasurer (1) - - - - - -
Appointed Deputy City Treasurer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Appointed Deputy City Treasurer / Financial Services
Manager - - - - - 1.00
Senior Account Clerk - - - - 0.50 1.00
** Account Clerk 0.54 0.54 - - - -
Intern 0.75
Total City Treasurer's Office 1.54 1.54 1.00 1.75 1.50 2.00
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
City Manager (Appointed by City Council) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant City Manager - - - - 1.00 1.00
Public Information Officer - - - - 1.00 1.00
Administrative Aide 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 - -
Administrative Analyst I - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Senior Administrative Analyst 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Clerk Typist (Lobby Receptionist) 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Intern - - 0.33 0.33 0.80 0.80
Rent Mediation Board (15) - - - - - -
Total City Manager's Office 4.00 4.00 3.33 4.33 4.80 4.80 TOTAL ELECTED & CITY MANAGER'S OFFICES 9.54 9.54 9.33 11.08 11.30 11.80 *Vacant position (frozen) due to Covid related budget
shortfalls
**Positions eliminated due to Covid related budget
shortfalls
Elected & City Manager's Offices
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
49 Elected and City Manager's Offices Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
328,399 414,173 492,368 524,543
188 105,184 - 155,184
269,207 223,300 273,887 297,715
1,299,928 1,511,492 1,865,645 1,
864,266
City Clerk
General Elect
ion
City Treasurer
City Manager
Total Elected and City Manager's Offices 1,897,722 2,254,149 2,631,900 2,841,708 City Clerk
18%
General Election
5%
City Treasurer
11%
Executive Offices
66%
50 ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
City of Gardena
GOAL02
Conducting a
classification and
compensation study
to assure that top-
notch employees are
recruited and
retained.
Updating and
streamlining the City
websites to provide
easily accessible
information to the
community.
GOAL03GOAL01The Administrative Services Department includes Human Resources, Technology, and, the Finance
Division. We safeguard the short and long-term
financial stability of the community through prudent
fiscal policies, coordinate the recruitment and
retention of top-notch employees, and safeguard
the sensitive information that filters through our
technology department. We are committed to
providing excellent service to our internal
departments and our community.
More Information:
www.cityofgardena.org
PLANNING FOR
THE FUTURE.
Conduct an RFP to initiate the
process of obtaining a new
Enterprise Resource Planning
system for accounting,
procurement, planning,
human resources, permitting,
licensing, etc.
51 TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Network Infrastructure
Desktop Computer Support
Mobile Devices Support
Telephone Administration
Cable Television
Webmaster
Graphics/Publications
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DIRECTOR
RAY BEEMAN
CITY MANAGER
CLINT OSORIO
RISK MANAGEMENT
Claim Processing
Property Damage Processing
Purchase Citywide Insurance
FISCAL RESOURCES
Payroll & Benefits
Accounts Payable & Receivable
Revenue Management/Collections
Budgeting, Auditing,
Grant/Special Revenue Accounting
Financial Analysis & Reporting
Capital Funding/Debt Administration
PURCHASING
Procurement
Service Contracts
PO Issuance
INVESTMENTS
Investment Management
Investment Analysis
Ensure Sufficient Liquidity
HUMAN RESOURCES
Recruitment & Hiring
Classification & Compensation
Employee/Retiree Benefits
Workers Compensation
Labor Relations
Employee Services
52 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Staffing Plan
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Fiscal Resources
Administrative Services Director 1.00 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00 Chie
f Fiscal Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
* Accounting/Finance Manager 1.00 1.00 - - - -
* Senior Accountant 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Senior Accountant Grants 0.10 0.10 - - - -
Cost Accountant - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Services Manager - - - - 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst III 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst II 1.00 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst I 1.00 1.00 - - - -
** Admin Aide 1.00 1.00 - - - -
* Junior Accountant / Financial Services Technician 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Payroll/Personnel Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Payroll
Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Intern - - - 0.75 0.75 1.50
** Account Clerk 0.46 0.46 - - - -
Senior Account Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00
Total Fiscal Resources 13.56 13.56 7.00 7.75 10.25 10.50 Human Resources
Human Resourc
es Manager 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - - 0.40 0.40
Human Resources Analyst - - 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.50
Administrative Analyst I 2.00 2.00
** Human Resources Technician 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Human Resources Coordinator - - - - 0.50 0.50
Risk Management Analyst - - - - 1.00 1.00
Intern - - - - 0.75 0.75
Total Human Resources 1.25 1.25 2.80 2.80 3.55 3.55
Technology Resources
Technology Manag
er 1.00 - - - - -
Information Technology Supervisor - - - - 1.00 1.00 Information Technology Coordinator 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 ** Graphics Technician 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Help Desk Technician - - 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Intermediate Clerk Typist 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Intern - - - 0.75 - -
Total Technology Resources 6.00 5.00 3.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 20.81 19.81 12.80 14.30 17.80 18.05 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Administrative Services
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
53 Administrative Services Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Human Resources 273,412 266,376 460,249 409,144
Technology Resources 516,716 571,197 646,926 781,995
Fiscal Resources 865,842 1,065,111 1,383,414 1,481,125
Total Administrative Services 1,655,970 1,902,684 2,490,589 2,672,264 Human Resources
15%
Technology
Resources
29%
Fiscal Resources
56%
54 Special Revenue Funds
Administrative Services
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Technology Replacement Fund 100,125 153,600 208,000 114,000 Deferred Maintenance Fund 38,017 1,199,694 704,000 - Vehicle Replacement Fund 527,972 475,000 550,000 550,000 South Coast Air Quality Management
District 132,812 80,500 80,500 80,500
American Rescue Plan Act 7,501,031 - 2,300,000 1,648,448 HOME ARP - - 1,040,280 -
Community Development Block Grants 619,521 125,000 499,355 119,355 Total Administrative Services
Special Revenue Funds 8,919,478 2,033,794 5,382,135 2,512,303 Technology
Replacement Fund,
4%
Vehicle Replacement
Fund, 21.9%
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District, 3.2%
American Rescue
Plan Act, 65.6%
Community
Development Block
Grants, 4.8%
55 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
56 PLANNING FOR
THE FUTURE.
More Information:
www.cityofgardena.org
RECREATION
HUMAN
SERVICES
City of Gardena
GOAL02
Facilitate, volunteer, and
provide recreational
opportunities for
individuals with disabilities
that promote an optimal
lifestyle.
GOAL03
Provide a wide variety of
events and community
services which facilitate
community unity,
engagement, and
cultural participation.
GOAL01
To support and promote the
quality of life and the local
economy; and ensure public
safety by providing a number
and quality of safe, accessible,
and affordable programs.
The Recreation and Human Services Department is
responsible for providing a broad array of recreation,
social and community services to a diverse
community of individuals, families, and organizations.
The Department is advised by four Commissions
appointed by the City Council: Recreation and Parks,
Senior Citizens, Youth, and Human Services. The
Department has two program divisions: the
Recreation Division and the Human Services Division.
57 DIRECTOR
STEPHANY SANTIN
Recreation
Aquatics, Sports
Leisure Services
Park Activities
Special Events
CITY MANAGER
CLINT D. OSORIO
Human Services
Youth & Family Services
Family Child Care (Grant)
Senior Services
(Grant Funded)
Senior Day Care
Senior Meals Program
Senior Activities
HUMAN SERVICES
COMMISSION
RECREATION & PARKS
COMMISSION
SENIOR CITIZENS
COMMISSION
GARDENA YOUTH COMMISSION
RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
58 RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Staffing Plan
RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Recreation
Director of Recreation & Human Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Rec
reation Program Administrator 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Aide 1.00
Administrative Analyst I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
** Administrative Analyst II 1.00 1.00 - - - -
* Recreation Services Manager (Vacant) 1.00 1.00 - - - 1.00 * Recreation Supervisor 2.00 2.00 - 1.00 2.00 2.00
Intern - - 0.19 0.19 0.60 0.60
Community Services Counselor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Community Center Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 * Recreation Coordinator 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
** Senior Clerk Typist (Vacant) 2.00 2.00 - - - -
* Recreation Leader III (Vacant ) 0.65 0.65 - - - -
Lifeguard/Instructor 0.55 0.55 - - - 7.50
** Recreation Leader II 3.23 3.23 1.07 1.07 3.80 3.80
** Recreation Leader I 15.81 15.81 10.74 10.74 15.46 15.46 Activity Coordinator - - - 1.00 2.00 2.00
Recreation Commissioners (5) - - - - - -
Senior Citizens Commissioners (5) - - - - - -
Human Services Commissioners (5) - - - - - -
Gardena Youth Commissioners (10) - - - - - -
Total Recreation 37.24 37.24 21.00 22.00 32.86 43.36
Facilities
Custodian Lead 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.75 1.59 1.59
Custodian II 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Custodian I 1.69 1.69 - - 3.50 3.50
Total Facilities 11.69 11.69 9.00 9.75 13.09 13.09
* Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Recreation & Human Services
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
59 RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Staffing Plan
RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES cont.
Human Services
Family Child Care Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Family Child Care Education Coordinator 0.23 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Family Child Care Education Assistant III 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Family Child Care Education Assistant II 2.06 2.06 1.56 1.56 1.63 1.63 Family Child Care Program Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.51 1.51 1.85 1.85 Family Child Care Program Assistant I 0.56 0.56 0.29 0.29 0.45 0.45 Administrative Aide 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00
Human Services Aide - - - - 1.18 1.18
Community Aide I (Vacant) 0.25 0.25 - - - -
Community Aide II 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Aide III (Vacant) 0.35 0.35 - - - -
Certified Nursing Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44 Nutrition Services Coordinator 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Homeless Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00
Recreation Therapist (Vacant) 0.54 0.54 - - - -
Recreation Leader II (Vacant) 0.86 0.86 - - - -
Recreation Leader I 0.50 0.50 1.21 1.21 - -
Assistant Site Manager III 0.48 0.48 0.45 0.45 - -
Meal Services Coordinator 2.41 2.41
* Community Aide I 0.74 0.74 - - - -
* Peer Advocate Counselor II 1.07 1.07 - - - -
Geriatric
Aide 0.75 0.75 0.58 0.58 0.40 0.40
Assistant Site Manager I 0.54 0.54 0.52 0.52 - -
Total Human Services 16.70 16.70 15.56 15.56 19.36 19.36 TOTAL RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES 65.63 65.63 45.56 47.31 65.31 75.81 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Proposed
FY 21/24
Recreation & Human Services
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 21/23
60 Recreation & Human Services Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Custodian Maintenance 751,788 1,109,477 1,241,894 1,316,346 H.S. Youth/Family Services 138,185 176,819 434,353 495,754 Aquatics - - 301,407
Leisure Services 1,404,931 2,099,520 2,760,206 2,815,559 Total Recreation & Human Services 2,294,904 3,385,816 4,436,453 4,929,066 Custodian
Maintenance
27%
H.S. Youth/Family
Services
10%
Aquatics
6%
Leisure Services
57%
61 Special Revenue Funds
Recreation & Human Services
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Senior Programs 1,128,391 702,115 706,414 718,626
Family Child Care 2,635,094 2,841,831 3,603,662 3,669,933 Community Development Block Grants 77,849 90,000 94,801 97,773 Recreation Grants 1,527,918 1,328,952 13,629,833 3,943,883 Total Recreation & Human Services
Special Revenue Funds 5,369,252 4,962,898 18,034,710 8,430,215 Senior Programs
8%
Family Child Care
44%
Community
Development Block
Grants
1%
Recreation Grants
47%
62 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
63 POLICE
DEPARTMENT
City of Gardena
Innovation and Technology
to Create a Safer Future-
Use innovation and
technology to increase
safety and effectiveness
when impacting crime and
disorder.
Succession Planning-
Develop innovative ways
to recruit, mentor, and
retain the next generation
of employees at the
Gardena Police
Department.
GOAL02
District Policing-
Continue to evolve our
Community Policing
outreach to
strengthen trust with
our community
partners.
GOAL03GOAL01
Our role is to foster a responsible partnership with the community to identify, reduce, eliminate, and prevent
problems that impact community safety and order. Our
employees provide law enforcement services directed
toward achieving the goals and objectives of the Police Department and the City. While adhering to the Law
Enforcement Code of Ethics, we execute our activities
along with our fellow departments to ensure that all work efforts effectively mobilize the resources of the Police Department to promote public safety in our community.
More Information:
www.cityofgardena.org
PLANNING FOR
THE FUTURE.
64 CITY MANAGER
CLINT D. OSORIO
POLICE CHIEF
MICHAEL SAFFELL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DISTRICTS 1, 2, & 3
DETECTIVE BUREAU
JAIL & SUPPORT SERVICES
TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
TRANSIT SAFETY
GJJIP
POLICE
65 POLICE
Staffing Plan
Police & Community Safety
Sworn Staffing
Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Police Captain 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
* Police Lieutenant 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00
Police Sergeant 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 14.00 14.00
* Police Officer 73.00 72.00 67.00 66.00 64.00 66.00
Police Trainee - - 1.50 - 2.00 2.00
Total Sworn 95.00 94.00 88.50 87.00 89.00 91.00
Non-Sworn Police Department
Administrative Management Analyst I 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.40 ** Administrative Analyst III 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Forensic Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Admin Support Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant to Chief of Police - - - - 1.00 1.00 Administrative Aide 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Police Service Officer 9.00 9.00 7.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 * Police Records Technician II 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Police Records Technician I 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 * Police Service Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Public Safety Officer 1.00 1.00 - - - -
** Police Assistant 18.61 18.61 14.99 14.99 15.50 15.50 Total Non-Sworn 42.91 42.91 35.29 36.29 39.90 39.90
TOTAL POLICE & COMMUNITY SAFETY 137.91 136.91 123.79 123.29 128.90 130.90 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
Police & Community Safety
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
66 Police Department Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Juvenile Justice & Intervention Program 33,438 50,000 50,000 50,000 Transit Security 233,897 246,391 292,837 306,480
Parking Compliance 134,984 150,100 150,100 150,100
Police Operations 17,329,004 20,019,810 22,073,934 23,069,923 Police Support 7,533,109 8,176,350 10,311,626 10,732,685 Total Police 25,264,433 28,642,651 32,878,497 34,309,188 Transit Security
1%
Other
1%<
Police Operations
67%
Police Support
31%
67 Special Revenue Funds
Police Department
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
70,525 151,000 150,000 150,000
- 75,500 75,500 75,500
69,760 100,000 100,000 100,000
Supplemental Law Enforcement
Traffic Safety Fund
OTS DUI Enforcement Awareness
Police Grants 810,714 197,181 26,126 26,126
Total Police Department
Special Revenue Funds 950,999 523,681 351,626 351,626 Supplemental Law
Enforcement
(SLESF)
43%
Traffic Safety Fund
22%
OTS DUI
Enforcement
Awareness Program
28%
Police Grants
7%
68 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
69 PUBLIC WORKS
City of Gardena
GOAL02
Develop Geographical
Information System for
Efficient operations by
streamlining
processes.
GOAL03
Update City Design Standards
& Provisions insuring
Infrastructure compliance for
all buildings within the City
jurisdiction
GOAL01
Monitor and Update
Public Works Fleet and
Equipment to Reduce
replacement cost for
fleet improvement.
The Public Works Department maintains the
safety and aesthetics of the city streets,
facilities, parks, medians and equipment at
the highest standards.
The Department provides continual
maintenance and improvement of the City’s
physical infrastructure and facilities and
provides quality engineering service.
More Information:
www.cityofgardena.org
PLANNING FOR
THE FUTURE.
70 DIRECTOR
ALLAN RIGG
CITY MANAGER
CLINT D. OSORIO
STREETS & ENGINEERING
STREET MAINTENANCE & IMPROVEMENTS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS & SIGNS
SEWERS, SANITATION, RECYCLING
ENGINEERING, CAPITAL PROJECTS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
PUBLIC WORKS
PARKS
PARKS MAINTENANCE
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
TREE TRIMMING
71 PUBLIC WORKS
Staffing Plan
PUBLIC WORKS
Parks
Park Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
* Park Maintenance Lead 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Tree Trimmer II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Park Maintenance Worker II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ** Park Maintenance Worker I 6.64 6.64 3.00 4.50 4.50 4.50 Total Parks 14.64 14.64 11.00 12.50 11.50 11.50
Facilities
* Maintenance Painter 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Senior Building Maintenace Worker - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sr. Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Building Maintenance Worker - - - - 1.00 1.00
Building Maintenance Lead 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Facilities 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Handy-Worker Program (CDBG)
Public Works Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Home Improvement Leadperson 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Home Improvement Maintenance Helper 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Handy-Worker Program (CDBG) 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
Public Works
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Budgeted
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
Proposed
72 PUBLIC WORKS
Staffing Plan
PUBLIC WORKS cont.
Streets & Engineering
* Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assi
stant Director/City Engineer - - - - 1.00 1.00
Public Works Superintendent - - - - 1.00 1.00
Administrative Aide - - 1.00 1.00 - - Program Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00
* Administrative Management Analyst II 1.00 1.00 - - - - Administrative Analyst I 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Administrative Analyst II - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Civil Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Civil Engineer 1.00 1.00
* Street Maintenance Superintendent (Vacant) 1.00 1.00 - - - - Associate Engineer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Engineer - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Electrical/Signal Technician II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Works Inspector 1.00 1.00
Public Work Lead 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Electrical/Signal Technician I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Equipment Mechanic - - - - 1.00 1.00
Equipment Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Equipment Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Street Traffic Painter 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Street Sweeper Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sewer M
aintenance Worker 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
* Cement Finisher (Vacant) 1.00 1.00 - - - -
** Secretary 1.00 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00
* Engineering Aide 1.00 1.00 - - - -
* Street Maintenance Workers 3.55 3.55 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Graffiti Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Right-of-Way Worker 3.20 3.20 3.83 3.83 4.30 4.30
Intern - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Clerk Typist 0.68 0.68 - - - -
Total Streets & Engineering 33.43 33.43 25.83 28.83 32.30 32.30 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 54.07 54.07 41.83 46.33 48.80 48.80
* Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls FY 23/24
Proposed
Public Works
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Budgeted
FY 22/23
Proposed
73 Public Works Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
241,421 400,517 493,983 523,096
831,964 656,567 740,500 753,351
883,857 1,016,714 1,448,571 1,385,089
485,659 599,170 619,360 637,936
1,334,705 1,676,193 1,677,509 1,757,725
363,341 375,728 438,936 454,098
461,343 602,184 808,341 851,992
Public Works Administration
Building Maintenance Street
Maintenance
Traffic Signal and Signs
Park Maintenance
Equipment Maintenance
Engineering
Tree Trimming 238,109 234,809 281,850 293,630
Total Publ
ic Works 4,840,401 5,561,882 6,509,050 6,656,917
Public Works
Administration
8%
Building
Maintenance 11%
Street Maintenance
21%
Traffic Signal and
Signs
10%
Park Maintenance
26%
Equipment
Maintenance
7%
Engineering
13%
Tree Trimming
4%
74 Special Revenue Funds
Public Works
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Consolidated Lighting & Artesia
Landscape 758,068 802,443 1,110,707 885,803
State Gas Tax & SB 1 3,061,721 4,208,018 6,108,847 3,115,597 Sewer Fund (Enterprise) 1,287,499 2,826,109 2,427,020 2,047,172 Prop C Local Return 596,118 3,384,103 4,087,947 1,091,228 Measure M Local 185,259 3,062,616 1,496,305 978,329 Community Development Block Grants 158,433 250,000 238,710 238,710 Public Works Grants 1,505,551 7,177,364 10,530,013 4,462,228 Total Public Works
Special Revenue Funds 7,552,650 21,710,653 25,999,549 12,819,067 Consolidated
Lighting & Artesia
Landscape
7%
State Gas Tax & SB 1
24%
Sewer Fund
(Enterprise)
16%
Prop C Local Return
8%
Measure M Local
8%
Community
Development Block
Grants
2%
Public Works Grants
35%
75 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
76 PLANNING FOR
THE FUTURE.
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
City of Gardena
GOAL02
Expedite the building
plan check process by
providing online
payment option for
plan check fees,
reducing customer
wait time for plan
check process.
GOAL03
Maintain awareness and
applicability of all new
housing legislation to
minimize any negative
impacts to the City,
increasing knowledge
and proficiency of
housing legislation.
GOAL01
Establish economic
development programs to
enhance business
outreach, marketing, and
investment, increasing
communication and
partnership with local
businesses.
The Community Development Department provides a variety of services. City Planning provides support to administer plans, programs, design guidelines and new legislation. The Economic Development Division is responsible for the attraction, retention, and expansion of businesses. The Building and Safety Division reviews construction plans to ensure they meet state building codes, issue permits, and provides inspections. The Code Enforcement and Animal Control Division ensure code
compliance and investigate violations ensuring properties and activities are conducted in accordance with the City’s
municipal code.
More Information:
www.cityofgardena.org
77 CITY MANAGER
CLINT D. OSORIO
DIRECTOR
GREG TSUJIUCHI
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING & PLANNING
PERMITS & LICENSING
BUSINESS LICENSE ENFORCEMENT
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
ANIMAL CONTROL & CODE
ENFORCEMENT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
78 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Staffing Plan
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
Director of Community Development - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Adm
inistrative Services Manager 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Economic Development Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Administrative Aide (Vacant) 1.00 1.00 - - - -
Customer Service Clerk I 0.60 0.60
Intern - - - 0.34 - -
* General Building Inspector 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 ** Permit/Licensing Technician I 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Permit/Licensing Technician II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Planning Assistant 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00
Planning Commissioner (5) - - - - - -
Program Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00
Senior Clerk Typist (Vacant) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Senior Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Code Enforcement Officer 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Community Service Officer - - 1.00 1.75 1.75 1.75
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 16.00 16.00 11.00 12.09 15.35 15.35 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Community Development
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
79 Community Development Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Economic Development 14,514 - 159,907 170,426
Code Enforcement - - 106,651 115,211
Animal Control 79,138 185,029 280,361 296,146 Permits and Licenses 432,334 617,764 583,168 641,324
Building Services 930,947 845,629 1,323,731 1,245,469
Development Services & Planning 129,487 30,720 65,565 68,565 Total Community Development 1,586,421 1,679,142 2,519,383 2,537,141 Economic
Development
7%
Code Enforcement
4%
Animal Control
12%
Permits and
Licenses
25%
Building Services
49%
Development
Services & Planning
3%
80 Special Revenue Funds
Community Development
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Community Development Block Grants 123,458 163,378 156,000 156,000 SB 2 Planning Grant 58,283 169,006 100,000 - Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant 15,400 300,000 200,000 - Total Community Development
Special Revenue Funds 197,142 632,384 456,000 156,000
Community
Development Block
Grants, 100.0%
81 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
82 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
83 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
PUBLIC SAFETY
LA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT CONTRACT
SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC
COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (911)
AREA G (EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS)
CITY MANAGER
CLINT D. OSORIO
COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS
CITY CELEBRATIONS
NON-DEPARTMENTAL OPERATING
COSTS
DEBT SERVICE
84 Non-Departmental Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Public Safety / Fire, 911, Area G 11,045,005 12,017,155 12,854,048 13,493,514 City Services 644,519 534,000 647,000 1,147,000
Debt Service 1,969,141 2,017,437 2,952,694 2,955,128 Transfers Out 7,894,784 8,870,425 8,697,147 6,012,543 Post Employment Benefits Fund 2,653,280 3,178,346 2,968,560 3,206,046 Total Non-Departmental 24,206,730 26,617,363 28,119,449 26,814,231 Public Safety / Fire,
911, Area G
50%
City Services
4%
Debt Service
11%
Transfers Out
23%
Post Employment
Benefits Fund
12%
85 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
86 GOAL02
Develop and
implement employee
training programs to
improve customer
service, leadership and
communication skill
sets.
GOAL03
Create infrastructure supporting
Compressed Natural Gas fueling,
charging of zero-emission battery
electric buses and energy generation
through installation of charging
stations, solar panels and battery
storage.
GOAL01
Identify and implement new
service opportunities that
will provide improved
mobility for GTrans
customers, and promote
efficiencies within the design
and operation of the service.
Providing transit service to the City of Gardena and
surrounding communities for over 82 years, GTrans
provides safe and reliable transportation to the
communities we serve. Providing nearly 3 million
trips annually using a fleet of alternatively-fueled,
zero-emission buses, the service area extends to
various cities in the South Bay. In addition GTrans
operates a paratransit service for seniors and
persons with disabilities.
GTRANS
City of Gardena
More Information:
www.cityofgardena.org
PLANNING FOR
THE FUTURE.
87 TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR
ERNIE CRESPO
GTrans
Enterprise Fund
TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
CITY MANAGER
CLINT D. OSORIO
TRANSIT MAINTENANCE
Equipment Maintenance
Facility Maintenance
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
Fixed Route Operations
Para-transit Operations
GTRANS
88 GTRANS
Staffing
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
Transit Administration
* Transportation Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * T
ransit Administrative Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Transit Operations Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Human Resources Manager 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - - 0.60 0.60
Human Resources Analyst 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50
* Financial Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Transit Administration Supervisor - - - - 1.00 1.00 * Transportation Administrative Manager 1.00 1.00 - - - - * Administrative Analyst III 1.00 1.00 - - - -
* Administrative Analyst II - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Information Technology Systems Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Senior Accountant Grants 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Administrative Analyst I 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 * Administrative Aide 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
Administrative Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00
Financial Services Technician - - - - 1.00 1.00
* Program Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00
Transit Marketing Coordinator - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Human Resouces Coordinator - - - - 1.50 1.50
* Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
* Cust
omer Service Clerk I 1.79 1.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Intern - - - - 1.50 1.50
Total Transit Administration 17.89 17.89 15.10 16.20 20.70 20.70 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Transportation Department
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
89 GTRANS
Staffing
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT cont.
Budgeted
FY18/19
Budgeted
FY 19/20
Budgeted
FY 20/21
Budgeted
FY 21/22
Proposed
FY 22/23
Proposed
FY 23/24
Transit Operations
* Transit Operations Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Transit Training and Safety Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * - - - - 1.00 1.00
* - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Tranit Operations Training Coordinator
Transit Planning & Scheduling Analyst Senior
Transportation Operations Supervisor - - - - 1.00 1.00 * Route Supervisors 9.00 9.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
* Bus Operators 88.00 88.00 72.91 72.91 74.80 76.80
* Paratransit Dispatcher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
* Paratransit Drivers 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 6.30
Relief Bus Operator Trainees - - - - 2.00 2.00
Relief Bus Operators 5.00 5.00 8.41 8.41 13.50 13.50
Total Transit Operations 110.46 110.46 101.78 101.78 112.76 115.60 Transit Maintenance
* Transit Maintenance Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Tranist Maintenance Coordinator - - - - 1.00 1.00 * Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Administrative Management Analyst I 1.00 1.00 - - - - * Transit Equipment Mechanics - Lead 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 * Transit Equipment Mechanics 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 * Transit Parts/Storeroom Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 * Maintenance Coordinator - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr. Building Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Sr. Transit Utility Specialist 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 * Apprentice Mechanic 2.00 2.00 - - 1.00 1.00
* Equipment Utility Worker II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * Equipment Utility Worker I 5.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 Total Transit Maintenance 25.00 25.00 20.00 21.00 26.00 26.00 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 153.35 153.35 136.88 138.98 159.46 162.30 * Vacant positions (frozen) due to COVID related budget shortfalls ** Positions eliminated due to COVID related budget shortfalls Transportation Department
Staffing Plan - Full Time Equivalent Positions
90 GTrans Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Facility Maintenance 655,755 907,083 967,275 1,025,034
Administrat
ion 7,462,191 4,819,143 5,429,504 5,633,183
Special Transit 488,079 740,582 1,087,178 1,453,529
Transportation 9,985,876 12,421,810 13,242,836 13,769,698 Equipment Maintenance 2,365,722 2,818,375 3,195,737 3,329,170 Capital Expenditures - 26,899,018 9,080,386 22,122,575 Expense Charges 2,305,
675 2,389,033 2,305,675 2,305,675
Transfers Out 199,458 - 128,450 129,671
Total GTrans 23,462,756 50,995,044 35,437,041 49,768,535 Facility
Maintenance, 3%
Administration, 11%
Special Transit, 3%
Transportation, 28%
Equipment
Maintenance, 7%
Capital
Expenditures, 43%
Expense Charges,
5%
Transfers Out, 0%
91 Special Revenue Funds
GTrans
Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Measure M Transit 1,824,788 3,830,656 2,864,928 2,864,928 GTrans OPEB Trust Fund - - - -
Measure R Transit 1,843,446 2,372,061 2,872,168 2,872,168 Prop 1B Capital - - - 697,000
Prop 1B Security - 38,122 100,000 -
Prop A Local Return 938,759 1,122,325 1,491,878 1,507,058 Total GTrans
Special Revenue Funds 4,606,993 7,363,164 7,328,974 7,941,154 Measure M Transit ,
36%
Measure R Transit,
36%
Prop 1B Security, 0%
Prop A Local Return,
19%
92 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS (CIP),
DEBT SERVICE, and
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
94 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS (CIP)
PROPOSED BUDGET
FY 2022/2023 & 2023/2024
96 FY 2022-2023 FY 2023-2024
$ 20,261,114 $ 6,917,000
$ 20,243,833 $ 8,875,000PARK/FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS City Parks, playgrounds, facility grounds and public parkways
STREETS, SEWER & STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
Maintain City streets, sanitary sewers, storm drain systems, sidewa lks, curbs, crosswalk
s, and signs
Maintain and control City traffic signals
Mechanic
al maintenance of City vehicle and equipment
Ensure compliance with State mandated safety and air quality program CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TOTAL $ 40,504,947 $ 15,792,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
97 98
Park Land in
Lieu,
$1,654,730
Measure R
Highway,
$3,658,267
STPL,
$1,547,800
Prop C,
$3,550,000
Measure A,
$1,750,000
SB1,
$4,268,047 Measure M,
$1,420,000
Prop 68,
$8,715,103
Measure G /
Bond
Proceeds,
$6,020,000
Federal
Earmark,
$1,400,000
Measure M
Highway,
$2,736,000
Other,
$3,785,000
CAPITAL REVENUE
… Where the money comes from ...
Streets,
$19,001,114 ,
Parks &
Facilities,
$20,243,833 ,
Sewer,
$750,000
Storm
water, $510,000
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
… Where the money goes...
Capital Improvement Projects Fiscal Year 2022-2023
99 JOB NO. PR
OJECT DESCRIPTION
820 ( c ) Mas F
ukai Park Rehabilitation - $1,000,000
Develop construction document/PS&E and pursue grant
opportunity for construction phase.
961 ( c ) Bell Par
k Rehabilitation Program – $149,730
Replace picnic shelters, bleachers, fencing, netting, asphalt; renovate building, courts and restroom.
963 ( c ) Rec Fa
cilities Landscaping & Outdoor Improvements -
$75,000
Irrigation, landscaping, parking lot improvements.
966 ( c ) T
hornburg Park Improvements - $150,000
Renovate southern portion of the park to add recreation space and opportunities.
967 ( c ) Mu
lti-Park Improvements/Facility Master Plan Study -
$1,170,000
Develop a master plan for parks and facilities.
Renovate/repair recreation facilities
978 ( c ) Garde
na Community Aquatic & Senior Center -
$14,920,000
Demo existing facilities and construct new aquatic and
senior community center.
505 ( c ) Ro
secrans Community Center - $1,000,000
Feasibility and conceptual design phase.
509 ( c ) Fi
re Station No. 158 Roof Replacement (Ceiling Repair
Phase) - $654,000
Repair water damaged ceiling tiles, lighting, hazardous material abatement, and all other incidental work.
520 ( n ) Ro
wley Park Gymnasium HVAC Upgrade – 170,000
Replace three (3) existing Carrier/BDP gas electric package units.
521 ( n ) Pu
blic Works Yard Workshop HVAC Upgrade - $50,000
Install a new gas electric package unit, rooftop duct, lashings, curbs and plenum drops.
522 ( n ) Na
kaoka Community Center HVAC Upgrade - $40,000
Install two new specialized condenser coils on 40-ton existing condenser.
528 ( n ) Ci
vic Center Lighting Improvement – $400,000
Installation of new lighting and landscape improvements 529 ( n ) Par
k Electronic Signage – $250,000
Installation of new electronic signs for several parks
530 ( n ) Ro
wley Park Basketball Court Rehabilitation – $215,103
Renovate/repair the existing basketball court
100
JOB NO. PROJ
ECT DESC RIPTION
930 ( c ) Verm
ont Ave Traffic Signal Improvements - $1,270,000
Improve traffic signals at Vermont Ave. and Rosecrans Ave., and Redondo Beach Blvd.
935 ( c ) Artesi
a Blvd Signal Improvements - $3,910,000
Improve traffic signals between Western Ave. and Vermont Ave. to address existing and future traffic conditions. Scope and budget amended to include landscape and pavement
improvements.
944 ( c ) 170th S
t Improvements (Normandie to Vermont) -
$700,000
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement, striping and pedestrian
safety as needed.
945 ( c ) R
edondo Beach Blvd Street Improvements - $2,736,000
Improve traffic flow along Redondo Beach Blvd. from
Crenshaw Blvd. to Vermont Ave; new medians, improve
signal, signing & striping, rehabilitate concrete and
pavements.
959 ( c ) Vermont Ave Improvements (Artesia to Gardena) - $800,000
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement, striping, and improve
pedestrian safety as needed.
972 ( c ) New
Marked Crosswalk with Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
(PHB) on Vermont Ave & 133th St. - $167,800
Install new crosswalk with PHB to improve pedestrian and vehicle safety.
973 ( c ) New T
raffic Signal at Vermont & Magnolia - $128,267
Traffic signal improvement to create a safer, more efficient way for vehicles to cross Vermont Ave. and enhance traffic flow.
985 ( c ) Budlong Ave (El Segundo to RBB) and Halldale Ave (135
th to El Segundo) Street Improvements - $1,490,000
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement, striping and pedestrian
safety as needed.
987 ( c ) Lo
cal Street Improvements FY 2020/2021 - $1,000,000
Rehabilitate various local residential streets asphalt
pavement, striping and pedestrian safety as needed.
988 ( c ) Crensh
aw Blvd Improvements (Rosecrans to El
Segundo) - $250,000
Rehabilitate various local residential streets asphalt
pavement, striping and pedestrian safety as needed. Multi- year project and current budget for design phase only.
990 ( c ) Sewer
Master Plan - $350,000
Assessment of hydraulic capacity of the City’s major sewers and prioritized set of Capital Improvement Projects to
101
address existing and projected future capacity requirements including GIS implementation.
JOB NO. PROJEC
T DESC RIPTION
992 ( c ) Van Ness
Ave Street Improvements (RBB to Marine) -
$800,000
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement, striping and pedestrian
safety as needed.
993 ( c ) Pedestrian Safety Improvements FY 2020/2021 - $380,000
Remove and replace damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
access ramps at various locations.
994 ( c ) Lo
cal Street Improvements FY 2021/2022 - $1,893,047
Rehabilitate various local residential streets asphalt
pavement, striping and pedestrian safety as needed.
996 ( c ) Ve
rmont Ave Street Improvements (Rosecrans to 135th) -
$540,000
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement, striping, and improve
pedestrian safety as needed.
998 ( c ) Sto
rm Drain Debris Screen FY 2020/2021 - $145,000
Continue implementing the Statewide Trash Provisions
through multi-phase iterative approach. Install the Full Capture System Equivalency (FCSE) screens by year 2025
to all City jurisdictional catch basins.
999 ( c ) Sto
rm Drain Debris Screen FY 2021/2022 - $165,000
Continue implementing the Statewide Trash Provisions
through multi-phase iterative approach. Install the Full Capture System Equivalency (FCSE) screens by year 2025
to all City jurisdictional catch basins.
507 ( c ) Cityw
ide Wayfinding/Entry Sign Program - $135,000
Install new and replace existing Citywide wayfinding sings to help direct drivers on city streets to city facilities such as parks, fire stations, and City Hall.
506 ( n ) Garden
a Decorative Street Lighting - $250,000
Convert existing street lights to SCE approved decorative lights on Gardena Blvd between Vermont and Western and
162
nd Street from Denker Ave to Western Ave.
513 ( n ) Ped
estrian Safety Improvements FY 2022/2023 -
$356,000
Remove and replace damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
access ramps at various locations.
514 ( n ) Lo
cal Street Improvements FY 2022/2023 - $1,775,000
Rehabilitate various local residential streets asphalt
pavement, striping and pedestrian safety as needed.
515 ( n ) St
reet Sweeping Truck Replacement - $500,000
Replace the existing street sweeping truck that has
exceeded its life expectancy.
102
JOB NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
516 ( n ) St
orm Drain Debris Screen FY 2022/2023 - $200,000
Continue implementing the Statewide Trash Provisions
through multi-phase iterative approach. Install the Full Capture System Equivalency (FCSE) screens by year 2025
to all City jurisdictional catch basins.
517 ( n ) In
telligent Transportation System (ITS) Master Plan -
$100,000
Development of citywide traffic communication network and signal system improvements that will provide the foundation for future smart city solutions and prioritize CIP
improvements.
518 ( n ) Coun
ty Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization
Program (TSSP) on East Rosecrans Ave - $20,000
A multi-jurisdictional project through the County of Los Angeles Project TSSP. The East Rosecrans Ave corridor
project from Ocean Gate Ave in the City of Hawthorne to Vermont Ave in the City of Gardena. Agencies are required to provide 20% matching funds and Gardena is anticipating four intersections.
519 ( n ) Coun
ty Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization
Program (TSSP) on Redondo Beach Blvd - $2000,000
A multi-jurisdictional project through the County of Los Angeles Project TSSP. The Redondo Beach Blvd corridor
project from Artesia Blvd in the City of Redondo Beach to Vermont Ave in the City of Gardena. Agencies are required to provide 20% matching funds and the Crenshaw Blvd is
the only participated intersection by Gardena due to City’s its own project on RBB, JN #945.
103
FUNDING SOURCE STREETS, SEWER & STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COST Measure R Highway #930 (c) Vermont Ave Traffic Signal Improvement 1,270,000 #935 (c) Artesia Blvd. Street Improvements (Western to Vermont) 2,260,000 #973 (c) New Traffic Signal at Vermont/Magnolia 128,267 Measure R Highway - Total 3,658,267 $3,658,267 Measure M Highway #945 (c) RBB Street Improvements (Crenshaw to Vermont) 2,736,000 $2,736,000 STPL #944 (c) 170th Street Improvements - Normandie to Vermont 680,000 #959 (c) Vermont Ave Improvements - Artesia to Gardena 700,000 #972 (c) New Marked Crosswalk with PHB on Vermont/133 St. 167,800 STPL - Total 1,547,800 $1,547,800
SB 821 (TDA) #993 (c) Pedestrian Safety Improvements FY 2021-2022 80,000 #513 (n) Pedestrian Safety Improvements FY 2022-2023 56,000 SB 821 (TDA) - Total 136,000 $136,000
Prop C #935 (c) Artesia Blvd. Street Improvements (Western to Vermont) 1,650,000 #985 (c) Budlong Ave (135th to RBB) & Halldale Ave (135th to El Segundo) Street Improvements 1,000,000 #992 (c) Van Ness Ave St Improvements - RBB to Marine 800,000 #996 (c) Vermont Ave St Improvements - Rosecrans to 135th St 100,000 Prop C - Total 3,550,000 $3,550,000
Gas Tax #507 (c) Citywide Wayfinding Program 135,000
#514 (n) Local Street Improvements 2022-2023 400,000
#515 (n) Street Sweeping Truck Purchase 100,000
Gas Tax - Total 635,000 $635,000
Measure M Local #944 (c) 170th Street Improvements - Normandie to Vermont 20,000 #959 (c) Vermont Ave Street Improvements - Artesia to Gardena 100,000 #985 (c)
Budlong Ave (135th to RBB) & Halldale Ave (135th to El Segundo) Street Improvements 490,000 #988 (c) Crenshaw Blvd St. Improvements - Rosecrans to El Segundo 250,000 #996 (c) Multi-Year Vermont Ave St Improvements - Rosecrans to 135th St 240,000 #517 (n) Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Master Plan 100,000 #518 (n) County Regional TSSP on Rosecrans 200,000
#519 (n) County Regional TSSP on RBB 20,000
Measure M - Total 1,420,000 $1,420,000
SB 1 #987 (c) Local Street Improvements 2020-2021 - Various 1,000,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 FUNDING SUMMARY 104
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 FUNDING SUMMARY #994 (c) Local Street Improvements 2021-2022 - Various 1,893,047 #514 (n) Local Street Improvements 2022-2023 1,375,000
SB 1 - Total 4,268,047 $4,268,047
Measure R Local #993 (c) Pedestrian Safety Improvements FY 2021-2022 300,000 #996 (c) Vermont Ave St Improvements - Rosecrans to 135th St 200,000 #513 (n) Pedestrian Safety Improvements FY 2022-2023 300,000 Measure M Local - Total 800,000 $800,000
Sewer Fund #990 (c) Sewer Master Plan 350,000
#515 (n) Street Sweeping Truck Purchase 400,000
Sewer Fund - Total 750,000 $750,000
Measure W #998 (c) Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2020-2021 145,000 #999 (c) Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2021-2022 165,000 #516 (n) Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2022-2023 200,000 Measure W - Total 510,000 $510,000
Lighting District #506 (n) Gardena Decorative Street Lighting 250,000 $250,000 STREETS, SEWER & STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $20,261,114
FUNDING SOURCE PARK/FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COST
Park Land in Lieu #820 (c) Mas Fukai Park Improvements 1,000,000 #961 (c) Bell Park Rehabilitation Program 149,730
#963 (c) Recreation Facilities Landscape and Outdoor Improvements 75,000 #966 (c) Thornburg Park Improvement 150,000
#967 (c) Multi-Park Improvements/Facility Master Plan Study 70,000 #520 (n) Rowley Park Gymnasium HVAC Upgrade 170,000
#522 (n) NCC HVAC Upgrade 40,000
Park Land in Lieu - Total 1,654,730 $1,654,730 Measure A #967 (c) Multi-Park Improvements/Facility Master Plan Study 1,100,000 #528 (n) Civic Center Lighting Improvements 400,000
#529 (n) Park Electronic Signage 250,000
Measure A - Total 1,750,000 $1,750,000
Prop 68 #530 (n) Rowley Park Basketball Court Rehabilitation 215,103 #978 (c) Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center 8,500,000 105
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 FUNDING SUMMARY Prop 68 - Total 8,715,103 $8,715,103
Bond Proceeds / Measure G #978 (c) Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center 5,020,000 #505 (c) Rosecrans Community Center 1,000,000
General Fund / Measure G - Total 6,020,000 $6,020,000 Federal Earmarks #978 (c) Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center 1,400,000 $1,400,000 Deferred Maintenance Fund #509 (c) Fire Station No. 158 Roof Replacement 654,000 #521 (n) PW Yard Workshop Hvac Upgrade 50,000
Deferred Maintenance Fund - Total 704,000 $704,000
PARK/FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $20,243,833
CIP- FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 TOTAL $40,504,947
106
Park Land in
Lieu,
$3,500,000
Measure M
Highway,
$2,627,000
STPL,
$40,000
Gas Tax,
$550,000Prop C,
$550,000 Measure A,
$375,000
Measure G /
Bond
Proceeds,
$5,000,000
Measure R,
$400,000
Sewer Fund,
$300,000
Measure W,
$200,000
SB1,
$1,350,000
Measure M,
$900,000
CAPITAL REVENUE
… Where the money comes from ...
Streets,
$6,417,000
Parks/Facility
$8,875,000
Sewer,
$300,000
Storm
water,
$200,000
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
… Where the money goes...
Capital Improvement Projects Fiscal Year 2023-2024
107
JOB NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
820 ( c ) Mas Fukai Park Rehabilitation - $3,500,000
Construction of the multipurpose building at Mas Fukai Park
967 ( c ) Multi-Park Improvements/Facility Master Plan Study - $375,000
Renovate/repair recreation facilities
505 ( c ) Rosecrans Community Center - $5,000,000
Feasibility of demo existing facility and construct a new multipurpose community building
108
JOB NO. PROJ
ECT DESCRIPTION
945 ( c ) Re
dondo Beach Blvd Street Improvements - $2,627,000
Improve traffic flow along Redondo Beach Blvd. from
Crenshaw Blvd. to Vermont Ave; new medians, improve
signal, signing & striping, rehabilitate concrete and
pavements.
523 ( n ) Sto
rm Drain Master Plan - $300,000
Assessment of hydraulic capacity of the City’s major storm drains and prioritized set of Capital Improvement Projects to address existing and projected future capacity requirements including GIS implementation.
524 ( n ) Stor
m Drain Debris Screen FY 2023/2024 - $200,000
Continue implementing the Statewide Trash Provisions
through multi-phase iterative approach. Install the Full Capture System Equivalency (FCSE) screens by year 2025
to all City jurisdictional catch basins.
525 ( n ) Lo
cal Street Improvements FY 2023/2024 - $2,450,000
Rehabilitate various local residential streets asphalt
pavement, striping and pedestrian safety as needed.
526 ( c ) Nor
mandie Ave (Artesia to 177th), Cassidey St
(Normandie to Vermont) and Vermont Ave (177th to
182nd) Improvements - $900,000
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement, striping and pedestrian
safety as needed.
527 ( n ) Ped estrian Safety Improvements FY 2023/2024 - $440,000
Remove and replace damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
access ramps at various locations.
109
FUNDING SOURCE STREETS, SEWER & STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COST Measure M Highway #945 (c) RBB Street Improvements (Crenshaw to Vermont) 2,627,000 $2,627,000 Sewer Fund #523 (n) Storm Drain Master Plan 300,000 $300,000 Measure W #524 (n) Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2023-2024 200,000 $200,000 Gas Tax #525 (n) Local Street Improvements 2023-2024 550,000 $550,000 SB 1 #525 (n) Local Street Improvements 2023-2024 1,350,000 $1,350,000 Prop C #525 (n) Local Street Improvements 2023-2024 550,000 $550,000 Measure R Local #526 (n)
Normandie (Artesia to 177th), Cassidy (Normandie to Vermont) and Vermont (177th to 182nd) Street Improvements 400,000 $400,000
Measure M Local #526 (n)
Normandie (Artesia to 177th), Cassidy (Normandie to Vermont) and Vermont (177th to 182nd) Street Improvements 500,000
#527 (n) Pedestrian Safety FY 2023-2024 400,000
Measure M Local - Total 900,000 $900,000
SB 821 (TDA) #527 (n) Pedestrian Safety Improvements FY 2023-2024 40,000 $40,000 STREETS, SEWER & STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $6,917,000
FUNDING SOURCE PARK/FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COST
Park Land in Lieu #820 (c) Mas Fukai Park Improvements 3,500,000 $3,500,000 Measure A #967 (c) Multi-Park Improvements/Facility Master Plan Study 375,000 $375,000 Bond Proceeds / Measure G #505 (c) Rosecrans Community Center 5,000,000 $5,000,000 PARK/FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $8,875,000
CIP- FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 TOTAL $15,792,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 FUNDING SUMMARY 110
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) STREET REHABILITATION TEN (10) YEAR PLAN - FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2022-2032 Prop C SB 821 Gas Tax SB1 Federal Sewer Measure W Lighting Dist. 1,366$ R
1,650$ 2,523$ R
430$
5,567$ R
100$ L 700$
40$ L 167$
130$ R
1,000$ 500$ L
1,000$
980$ L
350$
775$
80$ 300$ L
1,893$
100$ 200$ L 240$ L
145$
145$
135$
250$
40$ 300$ L
400$ 1,375$
200$
Citywide Wayfinding/Entry Sign Program
Gardena Decorative Street Lighting
Pedestrian Safety FY 2022-2023
Local Street Improvements FY 2022-2023
(Various)
Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2022-2023
FUNDING ($1,000's)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
New Traffic Signal at Vermont/Magnolia
Budlong Ave (135th to RBB) and Halldale Ave
(135th to El Segundo) Street Improvements
Local Street Improvements FY 2020-2021
(Various)
Crenshaw Blvd St. Improvements (Rosecrans
to El Seg.)
Sewer Master Plan
Vermont Traffic Signal Improvement at RBB
Artesia Blvd. Street Improvements (Western
to Vermont)
170th Street Improvements (Normandie to
Vermont)
RBB Street Improvements (Crenshaw to
Vermont)
Vermont Ave Street Improvements (Artesia
to Gardena)
New Marked Crosswalk with PHB on
Measure R* Measure M*
Local Street Improvements FY 2020-2021
(Various)
Vermont Ave Street Improvements
(Rosecrans to 135th)
Storm Drain Debris Screeen FY 2020-2021
Storm Drain Debris Screeen FY 2021-2022
Van Ness Ave Street Improvements (RBB to
Marine)
Pedestrian Safety FY 2021-2022
111
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) STREET REHABILITATION TEN (10) YEAR PLAN - FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2022-2032 Prop C SB 821 Gas Tax SB1 Federal Sewer Measure W Lighting Dist.
FUNDING ($1,000's)
Measure R* Measure M*
100$ 400$
100$ L
20$ L
130$ L 200$
3,525$ 120$ 4,819$ 7,677$ # 2,528$ 2,375$ 1,297$ 750$ 690$ 250$ 300$
200$
550$ 1,350$
400$ L 500$ L
40$ 400$ L
-$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 550$ 1,350$ -$ 300$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
L 500$ 1,300$
1,600
200$
40$ Pavement Mangaement Program Update
Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2024-2025
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Storm Drain Master Plan
Development of Intelligent Transportation
System (ITS) Master Plan
Street Sweeping Truch Purchase
County Regional TSSP on Rosecrans
County Regional TSSP on RBB
Normandie (Artesia to 177th), Cassidey
(Normandie to Vermont) and Vermont
(177th to 182nd) Street Improvements
Pedestrian Safety FY 2023-2024
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2023 - 2024
FISCAL YEAR 2024 - 2025
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2024-2025
(Various)
Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2023-2024
Local Street Improvement FY 2024-2025
(Various)
Local Street Improvements FY 2023-2024
(Various)
132nd St (Wilton to Water Chanel), 135th
(Crenshaw to Budlong), 139th (Ardath to Van
Ness), 145th (Gramercy to Western), 146th
(Western to Denker), 157th ( Van Ness to
Gramercy), 164th (Normandie to New
Hampshire) and 166th St (Western to
Normandie) and Marine Ave (Western to
Vermont) Street Improvements
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2024-2025
112
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) STREET REHABILITATION TEN (10) YEAR PLAN - FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2022-2032 Prop C SB 821 Gas Tax SB1 Federal Sewer Measure W Lighting Dist.
FUNDING ($1,000's)
Measure R* Measure M*
590$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,600$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
L 500$ 1,300$
1,600
200$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,600$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
L 500$ 1,300$
1,000$
600$ 200$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,600$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
Arterial and Collector Streeet Improvements
Storm Drain Debris Screen FY 2025-2026
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2025-2026
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2026-2027
(Various)
Local Street Improvement FY 2026-2027
(Various)
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2026-2027
Storm Drain Rehabilitation FY 2026-2027
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2027-2028
(Various)
Arterial and Collector Streeet Improvements
FISCAL YEAR 2027 - 2028
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2026 - 2027
Normandie Ave (RBB to El Segundo),
Rosecrans Ave (Normandie to Purche PCC
Repair), Vermont Ave (132nd to 135th) &
Vermont (Roscecrans, Marine and RBB,
161st PCC Repair) and Western Ave (RBB to
139th) Street Improvements
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2025-2026
(Various)
Local Street Improvement FY 2025-2026
(Various)
FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 2026
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
FISCAL YEAR 2026 - 2027
113
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) STREET REHABILITATION TEN (10) YEAR PLAN - FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2022-2032 Prop C SB 821 Gas Tax SB1 Federal Sewer Measure W Lighting Dist.
FUNDING ($1,000's)
Measure R* Measure M*
L 500$ 1,300$
1,000$
600$ 200$
45$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,600$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
L 500$ 1,300$
1,000$
600$ 200$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,000$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
L 500$ 1,300$
1,000$
600$ 200$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,600$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
Arterial and Collector Streeet Improvements
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2029-2030
(Various)
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2029-2030
Storm Drain Rehabilitation FY 2029-2030
Pavement Mangaement Program Update
Local Street Improvement FY 2027-2028
(Various)
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2027-2028
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2028-2029
FISCAL YEAR 2029 - 2030
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2027 - 2028
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2028 - 2029
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2029 - 2030
FISCAL YEAR 2028 - 2029
Arterial and Collector Streeet Improvements
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2028-2029
(Various)
Storm Drain Rehabilitation FY 2027-2028
Storm Drain Rehabilitation FY 2028-2029
Arterial and Collector Streeet Improvements
Local Street Improvement FY 2029-2030
(Various)
Local Street Improvement FY 2028-2029
(Various)
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2030-2031
(Various)
FISCAL YEAR 2030 - 2031
114
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) STREET REHABILITATION TEN (10) YEAR PLAN - FISCAL YEARS ENDING 2022-2032 Prop C SB 821 Gas Tax SB1 Federal Sewer Measure W Lighting Dist.
FUNDING ($1,000's)
Measure R* Measure M*
L 500$ 1,300$
1,000$
600$ 200$
45$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,600$ 200$ -$ 550$ 900$ L
40$ 400$ L
L 500$ 1,300$
1,000$
600$ 200$
550$ 40$ 400$ 900$ 500$ 1,300$ -$ 1,000$ 200$ -$ * L - Local Share & R - Regional/Highway funds
Pavement Mangaement Program Update
Ped Safety Improvement FY 2031-2032
(Various)
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2030-2031
Sewer Rehabilitation FY 2031-2032
FISCAL YEAR 2031 - 2032
Arterial and Collector Streeet Improvements
Local Street Improvement FY 2031-2032
(Various)
Storm Drain Rehabilitation FY 2031-2032
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2031 - 2032
Local Street Improvement FY 2030-2031
(Various)
Storm Drain Rehabilitation FY 2030-2031
TOTAL Fiscal Year 2030 - 2031
115
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
116
DEBT SERVICE
PROPOSED BUDGET
FY 2022/2023 & 2023/2024
117
Series PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL Certificates of Participation (COPs):
2006 A¹ 21,010,000 27,690,971 48,700,971 6,565,000 1,891,193 8,456,193 625,000 398,910 1,023,910 5,940,000 1,492,283 7,432,283 2007 A 2,800,000 1,929,165 4,729,165 1,315,000 356,432 1,671,432 120,000 66,575 186,575 1,195,000 289,857 1,484,857 Direct Purchase Lease:
2017² 1,635,000 121,078 1,756,078 565,000 11,748 576,748 280,000 8,798 288,798 285,000 2,950 287,950 Lease Revenue Bonds:
2014¹ 9,110,000 8,035,249 17,145,249 8,815,000 4,721,178 13,536,178 65,000 438,366 503,366 8,750,000 4,282,812 13,032,812 2021 13,155,000 5,319,216 18,474,216 12,880,000 4,988,000 17,868,000 440,000 498,000 938,000 12,440,000 4,490,000 16,930,000 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds:
2020³ 101,490,000 36,502,806 137,992,806 98,285,000 32,480,434 130,765,434 3,665,000 2,938,951 6,603,951 94,620,000 29,541,483 124,161,483 $155,700,000 $79,598,485 $235,29 8,485 $128,425,000 $44,448,985 $172,873,985 $5,195,000 $4,349,600 $9,544,600 $123,230,000 $40,099,385 $163,329,385 Professional services and Admin. Fees: 9,545$
TOTAL: 9,554,145$
REVENUE SOURCES:
Transfer-in from General Fund 7,896,043$
Transfer-in from GTrans Fund 1,386,169$
Transfer-in from Sewer Fund 64,719$
Transfer-in from Grant Funds 207,214$
9,554,145$
¹ In Fiscal Year 2014/2015, 2006 Series B was refunded by the 2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds. ² In Fiscal Year 2016/2017, 2006 Series C was refunded by the 2017 Direct Purchase Lease Bonds. ³ Of the original principal issued, $79,193,585 was allocated to governmenal activities (General) and $22,296,415 was allocated to business-type activities (Enterprise).
ENDING BALANCE June 30, 2023ORIGINAL ISSUE BEGINNING BALANCE July 1, 2022 RETIRED FY 2022-23
CITY OF GARDENA
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
118
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Refunding Certificates of Participation
DATE OF ISSUES: June 7, 2006
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $21,010,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $6,565,000.00 *
(June 30, 2022)
DESCRIPTION: The 2006 Refunding Certificates of Participation Series AB&C are issued to (1) refinance certain financial obligations of the City in connection with a Memorandum of Understanding with certain financial institutions, (2) prepay and defease certain outstanding 1994 Refunding Certificates of Participation, (3) fund a reserve fund and (4) pay certain costs of issuance.
The total $21,010,000 includes $12,495,000 aggregate principal amount of Certificates of Participation (2006 Refinancing Project, Series A), and $8,515,000 aggregate principal amount of Certificates of Participation Series B (the 2006C Certificates.) *Note-In Fiscal Year 2014-2015 the 2006 Certificate of Participation, Series B, was refunded by the 2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2014. The econmic gain on the current refunding was $1,637,398 and the savings in debt service payments was $2,360,051.
The bond interest rates vary from 3.625% to 4.500%.
PAYMENT DATES: January 1 and July 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 1,024,939 1,026,340 1,025,189 TOTAL: 1,024,939$ 1,026,340$ 1,025,189$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 437,509 398,910 357,759
Principal payment 585,000 625,000 665,000
Administration and trustee fees 2,430 2,430 2,430
TOTAL: 1,024,939$ 1,026,340$ 1,025,189$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2006 REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION SERIES A
(Issued in 2006)
119
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Direct Purchase Lease
DATE OF ISSUES: June 2017
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $1,635,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $565,000.00
(June 30, 2022)
DESCRIPTION: The 2017 Direct Purchase Lease Bonds were issued to (1) refund 2016 Certificate of Participation, Series C, (2) interests due and (3) pay certain costs of issuance.
The bonds bear interest at 2.07%.
PAYMENT DATES: January 1 and July 1
PAYMENT AGENT: Zions Bank
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 294,594 288,798 287,950 TOTAL: 294,594$ 288,798$ 287,950$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 14,594 8,798 2,950 Principal payment 280,000 280,000 285,000 Administration and trustee fees - - - TOTAL: 294,594$ 288,798$ 287,950$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2017 DIRECT PURCHASE LEASE
(Issued in 2017)
120
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
South Bay Communication Center
DATE OF ISSUES: January 24, 2007
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $2,800,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $1,315,000.00
(June 30, 2022)
DESCRIPTION: The 2007 A Refunding Revenue Bonds are issued pursuant to Indenture of Trust, dated as of February 1, 2007 by and between the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority (SBRPCA), and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as trustee. The bonds are issued to refund SBRPCA Revenue Bonds 2001Series A (City of Gardena Project) in an amount of $2,800,000, to fund the Reserve Account, and to pay certain costs of issuance.
PAYMENT DATES: January 1 and July 1
PAYMENT AGENT: Bank of New York Trust Company
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 189,295 188,545 187,545
TOTAL: 189,295$ 188,545$ 187,545$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 72,325 66,575 60,575
Principal payment 115,000 120,000 125,000
Trustee admin. services 1,970 1,970 1,970
TOTAL: 189,295$ 188,545$ 187,545$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2007 REVENUE BONDS SERIES A
(Issued in 2007)
121
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds
DATE OF ISSUES: May 1, 2015
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $9,110,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $8,815,000.00
(June 30, 2022)
DESCRIPTION: The 2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, were issued to (1) refund the 2006B Certificates, (2) fund capitalized interest for a portion of the Bonds through May 1, 2017, and (3) pay a portion of the costs of issuance.
The bond interest rates vary from 3.950% to 5.000%.
PAYMENT DATES: May 1 and November 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 508,579 506,011 508,444
TOTAL: 508,579$ 506,011$ 508,444$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 440,934 438,366 435,799
Principal payment 65,000 65,000 70,000
Administration and trustee fees 2,645 2,645 2,645
TOTAL: 508,579$ 506,011$ 508,444$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2014 TAXABLE LEASE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(Issued in 2015)
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
122
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds
DATE OF ISSUES: November 1, 2020
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $101,490,000.00 ($79,193,585 General and $22,296,415 Enterprise) AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $98,285,000.00 ($76,692,723 General and $21,592,277 Enterprise) (June 30, 2022)
DESCRIPTION: The 2020 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds were issued to (1) finance a portion of the City's unfunded accrued actuarial liability to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and (2) pay the costs of issuance of the bonds. Of the original principal issued, $79,193,585 was allocated to governmenal activities (General) and $22,296,415 was allocated to business-type activities (Enterprise).
The bond interest rates vary from 1.081% to 3.363%.
PAYMENT DATES: April 1 and October 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 4,503,020 4,948,349 5,319,938 Transfer-in from GTrans Fund 1,252,647 1,386,169 1,490,541 Transfer-in from Sewer Fund 58,485 64,719 69,592
Transfer-in from Grant Funds 156,174 207,214 223,625
TOTAL: 5,970,325$ 6,606,451$ 7,103,696$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 2,972,825 2,938,951 2,891,196 Principal payment 2,995,000 3,665,000 4,210,000 Administration and trustee fees 2,500 2,500 2,500
TOTAL: 5,970,325$ 6,606,451$ 7,103,696$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2020 TAXABLE PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS
(Issued in 2020)
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
123
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Lease Revenue Bonds
DATE OF ISSUES: September 1, 2021
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $13,155,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $12,880,000.00
(June 30, 2022)
DESCRIPTION: The 2021 Lease Revenue Bonds were issued to (1) finance a portion of the costs of construction of the new Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center, (2) finance the costs of acquiring and renovating an existing building to be converted into a new Community Center, (3) finance various park improvements, and (4) pay the costs of issuance.
The bond interest rates vary from 3.000% to 5.000%.
PAYMENT DATES: May 1 and November 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 606,216 938,000 941,000
TOTAL: 606,216$ 938,000$ 941,000$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 331,216 498,000 476,000
Principal payment 275,000 440,000 465,000
Administration and trustee fees - - -
TOTAL: 606,216$ 938,000$ 941,000$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2021 LEASE REVENUE BONDS
(Issued in 2021)
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
124
Series PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL Certificates of Participation (COPs):
2006 A¹ 21,010,000 27,690,971 48,700,971 5,940,000 1,492,283 7,432,283 665,000 357,759 1,022,759 5,275,000 1,134,524 6,409,524 2007 A 2,800,000 1,929,165 4,729,165 1,195,000 289,857 1,484,857 125,000 60,575 185,575 1,070,000 229,282 1,299,282 Direct Purchase Lease:
2017² 1,635,000 121,078 1,756,078 285,000 2,950 287,950 285,000 2,950 287,950 - - - Lease Revenue Bonds:
2014¹ 9,110,000 8,035,249 17,145,249 8,750,000 4,282,812 13,032,812 70,000 435,799 505,799 8,680,000 3,847,013 12,527,013 2021 13,155,000 5,319,216 18,474,216 12,440,000 4,490,000 16,930,000 465,000 476,000 941,000 11,975,000 4,014,000 15,989,000 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds:
2020³ 101,490,000 36,502,806 137,992,806 94,620,000 29,541,483 124,161,483 4,210,000 2,891,196 7,101,196 90,410,000 26,650,287 117,060,287 $155,700,000 $79,598,485 $235,298 ,485 $123,230,000 $40,099,385 $163,329,385 $5,820,000 $4,224,279 $10,044,279 $117,410,000 $35,875,106 $153,285,106 Professional services and Admin. Fees: 9,545$
TOTAL: 10,053,824$
REVENUE SOURCES:
Transfer-in from General Fund 8,270,066$
Transfer-in from GTrans Fund 1,490,541$
Transfer-in from Sewer Fund 69,592$
Transfer-in from Grant Funds 223,625$
10,053,824$
¹ In Fiscal Year 2014/2015, 2006 Series B was refunded by the 2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds. ² In Fiscal Year 2016/2017, 2006 Series C was refunded by the 2017 Direct Purchase Lease Bonds. ³ Of the original principal issued, $79,193,585 was allocated to governmenal activities (General) and $22,296,415 was allocated to business-type activities (Enterprise).
ENDING BALANCE June 30, 2024ORIGINAL ISSUE BEGINNING BALANCE July 1, 2023 RETIRED FY 2023-24
CITY OF GARDENA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
125
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Refunding Certificates of Participation
DATE OF ISSUES: June 7, 2006
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $21,010,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $5,940,000.00 *
(June 30, 2023)
DESCRIPTION: The 2006 Refunding Certificates of Participation Series AB&C are issued to (1) refinance certain financial obligations of the City in connection with a Memorandum of Understanding with certain financial institutions, (2) prepay and defease certain outstanding 1994 Refunding Certificates of Participation, (3) fund a reserve fund and (4) pay certain costs of issuance.
The total $21,010,000 includes $12,495,000 aggregate principal amount of Certificates of Participation (2006 Refinancing Project, Series A), and $8,515,000 aggregate principal amount of Certificates of Participation Series B (the 2006C Certificates.) *Note-In Fiscal Year 2014-2015 the 2006 Certificate of Participation, Series B, was refunded by the 2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2014. The econmic gain on the current refunding was $1,637,398 and the savings in debt service payments was $2,360,051.
The bond interest rates vary from 3.625% to 4.500%.
PAYMENT DATES: January 1 and July 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 1,026,340 1,025,189 1,021,486 TOTAL: 1,026,340$ 1,025,189$ 1,021,486$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 398,910 357,759 314,056
Principal payment 625,000 665,000 705,000
Administration and trustee fees 2,430 2,430 2,430
TOTAL: 1,026,340$ 1,025,189$ 1,021,486$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2006 REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION SERIES A
(Issued in 2006)
126
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Direct Purchase Lease
DATE OF ISSUES: June 2017
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $1,635,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $285,000.00
(June 30, 2023)
DESCRIPTION: The 2017 Direct Purchase Lease Bonds were issued to (1) refund 2016 Certificate of Participation, Series C, (2) interests due and (3) pay certain costs of issuance.
The bonds bear interest at 2.07%.
PAYMENT DATES: January 1 and July 1
PAYMENT AGENT: Zions Bank
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 288,798 287,950 - TOTAL: 288,798$ 287,950$ -$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 8,798 2,950 - Principal payment 280,000 285,000 - Administration and trustee fees - - - TOTAL: 288,798$ 287,950$ -$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2017 DIRECT PURCHASE LEASE
(Issued in 2017)
127
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
South Bay Communication Center
DATE OF ISSUES: January 24, 2007
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $2,800,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $1,195,000.00
(June 30, 2023)
DESCRIPTION: The 2007 A Refunding Revenue Bonds are issued pursuant to Indenture of Trust, dated as of February 1, 2007 by and between the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority (SBRPCA), and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as trustee. The bonds are issued to refund SBRPCA Revenue Bonds 2001Series A (City of Gardena Project) in an amount of $2,800,000, to fund the Reserve Account, and to pay certain costs of issuance.
PAYMENT DATES: January 1 and July 1
PAYMENT AGENT: Bank of New York Trust Company
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 188,545 187,545 186,295
TOTAL: 188,545$ 187,545$ 186,295$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 66,575 60,575 54,325
Principal payment 120,000 125,000 130,000
Trustee admin. services 1,970 1,970 1,970
TOTAL: 188,545$ 187,545$ 186,295$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2007 REVENUE BONDS SERIES A
(Issued in 2007)
128
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds
DATE OF ISSUES: May 1, 2015
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $9,110,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $8,745,000.00
(June 30, 2023)
DESCRIPTION: The 2014 Taxable Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, were issued to (1) refund the 2006B Certificates, (2) fund capitalized interest for a portion of the Bonds through May 1, 2017, and (3) pay a portion of the costs of issuance.
The bond interest rates vary from 3.950% to 5.000%.
PAYMENT DATES: May 1 and November 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 506,011 508,444 505,679
TOTAL: 506,011$ 508,444$ 505,679$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 438,366 435,799 433,034
Principal payment 65,000 70,000 70,000
Administration and trustee fees 2,645 2,645 2,645
TOTAL: 506,011$ 508,444$ 505,679$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2014 TAXABLE LEASE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(Issued in 2015)
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
129
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds
DATE OF ISSUES: November 1, 2020
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $101,490,000.00 ($79,193,585 General and $22,296,415 Enterprise) AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $94,620,000.00 ($73,832,923 General and $20,787,077 Enterprise) (June 30, 2023)
DESCRIPTION: The 2020 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds were issued to (1) finance a portion of the City's unfunded accrued actuarial liability to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and (2) pay the costs of issuance of the bonds. Of the original principal issued, $79,193,585 was allocated to governmenal activities (General) and $22,296,415 was allocated to business-type activities (Enterprise).
The bond interest rates vary from 1.081% to 3.363%.
PAYMENT DATES: April 1 and October 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 4,948,349 5,319,938 5,712,295 Transfer-in from GTrans Fund 1,386,169 1,490,541 1,601,109 Transfer-in from Sewer Fund 64,719 69,592 74,754
Transfer-in from Grant Funds 207,214 223,625 242,304
TOTAL: 6,606,451$ 7,103,696$ 7,630,462$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 2,938,951 2,891,196 2,827,962 Principal payment 3,665,000 4,210,000 4,800,000 Administration and trustee fees 2,500 2,500 2,500
TOTAL: 6,606,451$ 7,103,696$ 7,630,462$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2020 TAXABLE PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS
(Issued in 2020)
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
130
BOND ISSUES: CITY OF GARDENA
Lease Revenue Bonds
DATE OF ISSUES: September 1, 2021
AMOUNT OF ISSUE: $13,155,000.00
AMOUNT OUTSTANDING: $12,440,000.00
(June 30, 2023)
DESCRIPTION: The 2021 Lease Revenue Bonds were issued to (1) finance a portion of the costs of construction of the new Gardena Community Aquatic & Senior Center, (2) finance the costs of acquiring and renovating an existing building to be converted into a new Community Center, (3) finance various park improvements, and (4) pay the costs of issuance.
The bond interest rates vary from 3.000% to 5.000%.
PAYMENT DATES: May 1 and November 1
PAYMENT AGENT: US Bank
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
REVENUE SOURCES
Transfer-in from General Fund 938,000 941,000 942,750
TOTAL: 938,000$ 941,000$ 942,750$
EXPENDITURES
Interest Expense 498,000 476,000 452,750
Principal payment 440,000 465,000 490,000
Administration and trustee fees - - -
TOTAL: 938,000$ 941,000$ 942,750$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
2021 LEASE REVENUE BONDS
(Issued in 2021)
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
131
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
PROPOSED BUDGET
FY 2022/2023 & 2023/2024
132
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Internal Serv
ice Funds are established to cover the cost of insurance and other ongoing administrative obligations and to separate these funds from the G eneral Fund account . The City is self -insured for general liability, w orker’s compensation and employee health benefits coverage. Funds in these accounts are used to pay all self -insured losses and related administrative costs with the balance in each account at the end of the fiscal year accumulated as reserves against future liabilities.
SELF - INSURA
NCE PROGRAMS
The City retains
the services of Third- Party Administrators
(TPA) to handle claims for general liability, worker’s
compensation and health care claims. Current services are provided by:
General Liabilit
y Claims – Carl Warren & Co.
Workers Compensation Claims – AdminSure
Health Benefits Plan – Health Now
• General Liability
The General Liability Fund provides for the City's general liability, self-insurance program, and other insurance needs in order to reduce cost and provide better control; to provide for the administration and legal service necessary for the operation of this program; to provide insurance protection against catastrophic loss or losses and to provide payment of liability insurance purchased in excess of the City’s self- insurance limits.
Charges to departments are established by the Director of Administrative Services and included in the budget manual.
Upon recommendation from the finance committee,
additional reserves may be transferred at year-end from the General Fund reserves.
• Workers Compensation
The Workers Compensation Fund is established to pay
administrative and legal services necessary for the
operation of this program; to provide payment of
compensation benefits and medical expenses associated
with industrial injuries; to provide insurance protection against a catastrophic loss or losses; to review and analyze the City’s industrial injury risks and determine the most suitable means of reducing employee expos ure, and to
develop procedures for the administration of the City’s Self- Insurance Compensation and Safety Program.
Charges to departments are established by the Director of Administrative Services and included in the budget manual.
PUBLIC SERVICE GOAL: To continually build and maintain adequate reserves through annual budget contributions to protect the City’s investment in the cost of insurance and other ongoing administrative obligations. 133
• Health Benefits
The City is self-insured for health benefits for its employees and purchases reinsurance to transfer some of its risk.
Rates are set by the Health Benefits Committee, which is comprised of management and one employee from each of
the employee bargaining groups. The committee reviews
the cost of health care, changes in benefits, and market trends in order to establish the rate for health insurance.
Fund levels are set at a 70% confidence
rate.
The fund is supported through contributions of both
employees and the City as negotiated each year with the employee bargaining groups. The City’s contribution is
$1,376 per month for the employee and one dependent.
Employees contribute an additional $494 per month if they have more than one dependent insured. Rates for life
insurance varies depending on the bargaining group.
134
Internal Service Funds Audited
2020-2021
Adopted
2021-2022
Proposed
2022-2023
Proposed
2023-2024
Self-Insurance Liability 1,895,716 2,364,423 2,650,414 2,736,135 Self-Insurance Workers Comp 3,161,078 1,940,032 2,217,890 2,279,683 Self-Insurance Health Benefit Fund 8,961,087 9,567,611 10,082,809 11,074,225 Total Internal Service Funds 14,017,881 13,872,066 14,951,113 16,090,043 Self-Insurance
Liability
17%
Self-Insurance
Workers Comp
14%
Self-Insurance
Health Benefit Fund
69%
135
APPENDIX
136
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
The total set of records and procedures that are used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of an entity.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Amounts owing to private persons, firms, or corporations for goods and services received.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Amounts owing from private persons, firms, or corporations for goods and services furnished.
ACCRUAL
Transactions and events are recognized as revenues/gains or expenses/losses when they occur, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows.
ADOPTION
Formal action by the City Council that sets the spending path for the fiscal year.
ALLOCATION
The practice of spreading costs among various cost centers on some predetermined reasonable basis (e.g., percentages) as opposed to distribution of expenses on a unit charge or direct identification basis.
ACTIVITY
A specific unit of work or service performed.
APPROPRIATI
ON
An authorization made by the City Council that permits officials to incur obligations against and to make expenditures of governmental resources. Appropriations are usually made for fixed amounts and are typically granted for a one-year period.
APPROPRIATI
ON ORDINANCE
The official enactment by the City Council establishing the legal authority for the City officials to obligate and expend resources.
ASSESSED VALUATION
The estimated value placed upon real and personal property by the County Assessor as the basis for levying property taxes.
ASSETS
The entries on a balance sheet showing all properties and claims against others that may be used directly or indirectly to cover liabilities.
AUDIT
A systematic examination of resource utilization concluding in a written report. It is a test of management’s internal accounting controls and is intended to:
• Ascertain whether financial statements fairly present financial positions and results of operations;
• Test whether transactions have been legally performed; • Identify areas for possible improvements in accounting practices and procedures;
• Ascertain whether transactions have been recorded accurately and consistently; and
• Ascertain the managerial conduct of officials responsible for governmental resources.
BALANCE SHEET
A statement purporting to present the financial position of an entity by disclosing its assets, liabilities, and fund equities as of a specific date.
Under varying circumstances, assets are carried at “lower of cost or market,” “cost less allowance for depreciation,” etc.
BOND (Debt Instrument)
A written promise to pay (debt) a specified sum of money (called principal or face value) at a specified future date (called the maturity date) along with periodic interest paid at a specified percentage of the principal (interest rate). Bonds are typically used for long- term debt to pay for specific capital expenditures.
BUDGET (Operating)
A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period (typically a fiscal year) and the proposed means of financing them (revenue estimates). The term is also sometimes used to denote the officially approved expenditure ceilings under which the City and its departments operate .
BUDGET CALENDAR
The schedule of key dates or milestones which the City follows in the preparation and adoption of the budget.
137
BUDGET MESSAGE (City Manager’s)
A general discussion of the proposed budget presented in writing as a part of, or supplement to, the budget document. The budget message explains principal budget issues against the background of financial experience in recent years and presents recommendations made by the City Manager
.
CAPITAL ASSETS
Assets of significant value and having a useful life of more than one year. Capital assets are also called fixed assets.
CAPITAL BUDGET
A plan of proposed capital expenditures and the means of financing them. The capital budget is enacted as part of the City’s consolidated budget which includes both operating and capital outlays, and is based on a capital improvement program (CIP).
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a period of ten future years setting forth each capital project, the amount to be expended in each year, and the method of financing those expenditures.
CAPITAL OUTLAYS
Expenditures for the acquisitions of capital assets. Includes the cost of land, buildings, permanent improvements, machinery, large tools, rolling, and stationary equipment.
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Projects which purchase or construct capital assets. Typically a capital project encompasses a purchase of land and/or the construction of a building or facility.
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Used to account for financial resources used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds).
CERTIFICATE
OF DEPOSIT
A negotiable or non-negotiable receipt for monies deposited in a bank or financial institution for a specified period and rate of interest.
COMMODITIES
Items of expenditure (in the operating budget) which after use, are consumed or show a material change in their physical condition, and which are generally of limited value and are characterized by rapid depreciation, i.e. office supplies and motor fuel.
CONTINGENCY
A budgetary reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise budgeted for.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Items of expenditure for services the City receives from an internal service fund or an outside company. Utilities, rent and maintenance service agreements are examples of contractual services.
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX (CPI):
A statistical description of price levels provided by the U.S. Department of Labor. The change in this index from year to year is used to measure the cost of living and economic inflation.
DEBT SERVICE
Payment of interest and repayment of principal to holders of the City’s debt instruments.
DEBT SERVICE FUND
Used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and payment of, general long-term debt.
DEFICIT
• The excess of entity’s liabilities over its assets (See Fund Balance). • The excess of expenditures or expenses over revenues during a single accounting period.
DEPARTMENT
An organizational unit comprised of one or more divisions.
DEPRECIATION
Expiration in the service life of capital assets attributable to wear and tear, deterioration, action of the physical elements, inadequacy or obsolescence.
• That portion of the cost of a capital asset, which is charged as an expense during a particular period.
DEBT RATIO
A ratio that indicates the proportion of debt compared to assets, calculated by dividing total debt by total assets.
138
DIVISION
A program or activity, within a department, that furthers the objectives of the City Council by providing services or products.
ENCUMBRANCES
Obligations in the form of purchase orders or contract commitments, which are chargeable to an appropriation and for which a part of the appropriation is reserved. They cease to be encumbrances when paid or when an actual liability is set up.
ENTERPRISE
FUND
Separate financial accounting used for government operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to business enterprises, and where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public be financed or recovered primarily through user charges, or where the governing body had decided that periodic determination of net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, or other purposes (i.e. utilities and transit systems).
EXPENDITURES
Where accounts are kept on the accrual or modified accrual basis of accounting, the cost of goods received or services rendered whether cash payments have been made or not. Where accounts are kept on a cash basis, expenditures are recognized only when the cash payments for the above purposes are made.
FISCAL YEAR
The City’s fiscal year is based on the twelve- month period beginning July 1st and ending the following June 30th.
FIXED CHARGES
Items of expenditure for services rendered by internal operations of the City. Examples include: rental equipment, computer services, building rental, indirect operating expenses, and depreciation.
FRINGE BENEF
ITS
Included are employee retirement, social security, Medicare, health, dental, life insurance, workers’ compensation, uniforms, and deferred compensation plans.
FULL FAITH AND CREDIT
A pledge of the City’s taxing power to repay debt obligations (typically used in reference to General Obligation Bonds or tax-supported debt).
FUND
An independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts recording cash and/or other resources together with all related liabilities, obligations, reserves and equities which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives.
FUND BALANCE
The excess of an entity’s assets over its liabilities. A negative fund balance is sometimes called a deficit.
GENERAL FUND
The fund supported by taxes, fees and other revenues that may be used for any lawful purpose. The general fund accounts for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
GENERAL OBLI
GATION BONDS
When the City pledges its full faith and credit to the repayment of the bonds it issues, then those bonds are general obligation (G.O. ) bonds.
Sometimes the term is also used to refer to bonds, which are to be repaid from taxes and other general revenues. In California, G.O. bonds must be authorized by public referenda with two- thirds voter approval.
GOVERNMENT
AL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD
To establish and improve standards in governmental accounting and financial reporting that will result in useful information.
INTERGOVE
RNMENTAL GRANT
A contribution of assets (usually cash) by one governmental unit or organization to another. Typically, these contributions are made to local governments from the State and Federal governments. Grants are usually made for specified purposes.
INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
Funds used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency to another department or agency within the same organization.
139
INVESTMENT
Securities and real estate purchased and held for the production of income in the form of interest, dividends, rental or base payments.
LIABILITY
Debt or other legal obligations arising out of transactions in the past, which must be liquidated, renewed or refunded at some future date; financial obligations entered in the balance sheet. NOTE: The term does not include encumbrances.
MATURITIES
The dates on which the principal or stated values of investments or debt obligations mature and may be reclaimed.
MODIFIED ACCRUAL
Revenues are recognized when measurable and available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when an event or transaction is expected to draw on current or available resources.
MUNICIPAL CODE
A book containing City Council Approved Ordinances currently in effect. The Code defines City Policy in various categories (i.e., building regulations, planning and zoning regulations, sanitation and health standards, and traffic regulations).
OBJECT OF E
XPENDITURE
Expenditure classifications based upon the types of categories of goods and services purchased. Examples include:
• personnel services (salaries and wages)
• contractual services (utilities, maintenance contracts, travel) • commodities
• fixed charges (rental of City equipment, City building rental) • capital outlays
OBJECTIVES
Departmental statements describing significant activities to be accomplished during the fiscal year.
OPERATING FUNDS
Resources derived from recurring sources used to finance ongoing operating expenditures and pay-as-you-go capital projects.
ORDINANCE
A formal legislative enactment by the governing board (City Council) of a municipality. If it is not in conflict with any higher form of law, it has the full force and effect of law within the boundaries of the municipality to which it applies.
PERFORMANCE M
EASURES
Specific quantitative measures of work performed within an activity or program (e.g., total miles of streets cleaned). A specific quantitative measure of results obtained through a program or activity (e.g., reduced incidence of vandalism due to new street lighting program).
PERSONNEL SERVI
CES
Items of expenditures in the operating budget for salaries and wages paid for services performed by City employees, the incident fringe benefit cost associated with City employment, and amounts paid to outside firms, consultants, or individuals for contract personnel services.
PROGRAM
An activity , or division, within a department, which furthers the objectives of the City Council, by providing services or a product.
RATING
The credit worthiness of a City as evaluated by independent agencies.
REIMBURSEME
NTS
Payments remitted by another agency, department, or fund to help defray the costs of a particular service or activity for which some benefit was obtained by the reimbursing party. These amounts are recorded as expenditures, or expenses in the reimbursing fund and as a reduction of expenditures, or expenses, in the fund that is reimbursed.
RESERVE
An account used to indicate that a portion of fund equity is legally restricted for a specific purpose, or set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise budgeted for. Reserve accounts can also be used to earmark a portion of fund balance to indicate that it is not appropriate for expenditures.
140
RESOLUTION
A special order of the City Council which requires less legal formality than an Ordinance in terms of public notice and the number of public readings prior to approval. A Resolution has lower legal standing than an Ordinance. The adopted operating budget is approved by Resolution and requires a majority vote of the Council members present at the time of adoption.
RESOURCES
Total dollars available for appropriations including estimated revenues, fund transfers, and beginning fund balances.
REVENUE
The term designates an increase to a fund’s assets which:
• does not increase a liability (e.g., proceeds from a loan); • does not represent a repayment of an expenditure already made; • does not represent a cancellation of certain liabilities; and • does not represent an increase in contributed capital.
REVENUE BONDS
When a government issues bonds, which do not pledge the full faith and credit of the jurisdiction, it issues limited liability revenue bonds.
Typically, pledges are made to dedicate one specific revenue source to repay these bonds. In addition to a pledge of revenues, such bonds sometimes may be secured by a lien against property.
REVENUE ESTIMA
TES
A formal estimate of how much revenue will be earned from a specific revenue source for some future period; typically, a future fiscal year.
REVOLVING
ACCOUNT
A reserve account that is funded by the amortization of a capital asset value charged annually to the user department with the accumulated funds used to replace the asset when it has reached the end of its normal life cycle.
SALARIES AND BENE
FITS
An operating budget category which generally accounts for full -time and part-time salaries, overtime costs, and fringe benefits.
SOURCE OF REV
ENUE
Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin.
SPECIAL REV
ENUE FUND
Used to account for the proceeds of special revenue sources that are restricted by law (or ad ministrative action) to expenditures for specific purposes.
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
This budget category accounts for all nonpersonnel, and noncapital outlay expenses (i.e., building/structure maintenance, contractual services, equipment maintenance, office supplies, small tool purchases, and utility costs).
TAXES
Compulsory charges levied by a government for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or property for current or permanent benefits, such as special assessments. Neither does this term include charges for services rendered only to those paying such charges.
TRIPLE-F
LIP
The revenue formula the State of California imposed on local government. T he formula modifies (flips) the rate of distribution of three (triple) revenue sources that are passed through and distributed by the State: property tax, sales tax and motor vehicle-in-lieu fees.
TRANSFERS IN/OUT
Payments from one fund to another fund, primarily for work or services provided.
TRUST AND AGENCY F
UND
A type of fund that temporarily holds monies for other agencies or legal entities.
UNIT COST
The cost required to produce a specific product or unit of service (e.g., the cost to purify one thousand gallons of water).
USER CHARGES (al
so known as USER FEES)
The payment of a fee for direct receipt of a public service by the party benefiting from the service.
YIELD
The rate earned on an investment based on the price paid. 141
AB Assembly Bill
ABC Alcoholic Beverage Control
ADA American Disabilities Act
ADCRC Alzheimers Day Care Resource Center
AMBAC American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
AQMD Air Quality Management District
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
ASST Assistant
ATF Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, US Bureau of
ATM Automated Teller Machine
AVE Avenue
BHS Behavioral Health Services
BIT Biannual Inspection of Terminals
BJA Bureau of Justice Assistance
BLDG Building
BLVD Boulevard
CA California
CAL OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Act
CALWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAPE Community Action Project for the Elderly
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CDE California Department of Education
CDPP County Delinquency Prevention Program
CEO Chief Executive Officer
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CHGS Charges
CINDEX Clerk's Index
CIP Capital Improvement Projects
CIS Continuous Improvement System
CJSSP County Justice System Subvention Program
CLEEP California Law Enforcement Equipment Program
CLETEP California Law Enforcement Technology
Equipment Program
CO Company
CO-ED Co-educational
C of O Certificate of Occupancy
COLA Cost of Living Adjustment
COPS Citizen Option for Public Safety
CORP Corporation
CPI Consumer Price Index
CSBG Community Services Block Grant
CSMFO California Society of Municipal Finance Officers
DEMO Demolition
DEV Development
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DIST District
DMH Department of Mental Health
DOC Document
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EAP Employee Assistance Program
EDWAA Economically Dislocated Worker Adjustment Act
E.G. For Example (Exempli Gratia)
ENF Enforcement
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ERAF Educational Relief Augmentation Fund
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
E & T Education and Training
ETC Etcetera
EXP Expense
FAU Federal Aid to Urban Areas
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FPPC Fair Public Practices Commission
142
G-CAN Gardena Community Action Network
GAAFR Governmental Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Practices
GAAS Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
GASB Governmental Accounting Standards Board
GBAC Gardena Business Advisory Council
GED General Education Development
GEPCO Gardena Employee Personal Computer Opportunity
GFCC Gardena Family Child Care
GFOA Government Finance Officers Association
GIS Geographic Information System
GMBL Gardena Municipal Bus Line
GMC Gardena Municipal Code
GRADE Gardena Regional Anti-Drug Education
GRAGA Gardena Royal and Ancient Golf Association
GREAT Gang Resistance Education and Training
HS Human Services
HUD The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ICMA International City/County Management Association
i.e. (Latin: id est) that is
IMPR Improvement
INC. Incorporated
IND Industrial
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
JAG Justice Assistance Grant Program
JR. Junior
JT POWERS Joint Powers
L.A. Los Angeles
LACDACC Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control LACoFD Los Angeles County Fire District
LLEBG Bureau of Justice Assistance Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program
LP Limited Partnership
LAIF Local Agency Investment Fund
LTD. Limited
MAINT Maintenance
MDC Mobile Data Computers
MDT Mobile Data Terminals
MGMT Management
MGR. Manager
MIC Management Information Center
MISC. Miscellaneous
MMIC Municipal Mutual Insurance Company
MTA Metropolitan Transportation Authority
N.A. National Association
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NRC National Revenue Corp.
OAA Older Americans Act
OCJP Office of Criminal Justice Planning
OJP Office of Justice Programs
OSHA Occupational, Safety and Health Administration
OTS Office of Traffic Safety
PARS Public Agency Retirement System
PERS Public Employee's Retirement System
PK. Park
PL Place
POP Problem Oriented Policing
POST Police Officers Standards and Training
PRIM Primary
PROG Program
PROP 127 Proposition 127: 1/2 cents of sales for public safety services (Public Safety Augmentation Fund)
PROP 40 Proposition 40: California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act
of 2002
PSI Progressive Solutions, Inc.
PT Part-time
143
RCC Regional Communication Center
REC. Recreation
RFP Request for Proposal
SB Senate Bill
S.B.R.P.C.A. South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority SBWIB South Bay Workforce Investment Board
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAMP Senior Community Action Meals Program
SCAMP HD Senior Community Action Meals Program-Home Delivered SCIBA Southern California International Business Academy SDA Service Delivery Area
SDCC Senior Day Care Center
SLESF Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund
SPORTS Service Providing Opportunities through Recreational Training & Support
SR. Senior
ST Street
STEP Strategic Traffic Enforcement Program
STEP Subsidized Transitional Employment Program
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
STPLHG Surface Transportation Program Local Hazard Grant SUBVN Subvention
SYETP Summer Youth Employment and Training Program
TDA Transportation Development Act
TEA 21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TECH Technical
TRANS Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes
TRAP Taskforce For Regional Auto Theft Prevention
TRG Training
TV Television
UHP Universal Hiring Program
US United States
USDOJ U.S. Department of Justice
WIA Workforce Investment Act
WRG Waste Resources of Gardena
WOTC Work Opportunity Tax Credits
YMCA Young Men's Christian Association
144
City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 11.B
Section: DEPARTMENTAL
ITEMS - ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
Meeting Date: June 28, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:
RESOLUTION NO. 6588
, Acknowledging the Receipt and Filing of the
Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 6588
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:
Staff requests that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 6588 approving the City's Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.
City staff completed a review of its Investment Policy to ensure compliance with state and federal statutes, maximizing interest and minimizing risk.
The purpose of the Investment Policy is to identify various policies and procedures that will foster a prudent and systematic investment program designed to seek the City objectives of safety, liquidity and return on investment through a diversified investment portfolio. The policy also serves to organize and formalize the City's investment related activities. The policy is written to incorporate industry best practices and recommendations from sources such as the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), California Municipal Treasurer's Association (CMTA), California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (CDIAC), the Association of Public Treasurers (APT) and Chandler Asset Management, Inc.
FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Reso. 6588 Investment Policy 2022-2023 with Policy.pdf
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
RESOLUTION
NO. 6588
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT
AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT
POLICY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed legislation into law effective January 1, 1996 (SB564); and
WHEREAS, this statement is intended to outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City's Cash Management System and for prudent investment of the City's funds, and to provide guidelines for suitable investments.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Treasurer of the City of Gardena declares the annual Statement of Investment Policy for fiscal year 2022- 2023 to be as outlined in the City of Gardena’s Investment Policy.
SECTION 2. An annual statement of investment policy for the City of Gardena has been filed by the Cit y Treasurer for fiscal year 2022- 2023 in compliance with Section 53646(A) (2) of the Government Code of the State of California .
SECTION 3. That this resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption by the City Council.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this reso lution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
Pass
ed, approved, and adopted this 28th day of June 2022.
TASHA CERDA, Mayor
ATTEST:
MINA SEMENZA , City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CARMEN VASQUEZ , City Attorney
CITY OF GARDENA
INVESTMENT POLICY
JULY 2022
1 CITY OF GARDENA
INVESTMENT POLICY
CONTENTS
I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 II. Scope ................................................................................................................................ 2 III. Prudence ........................................................................................................................... 2 IV. Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 3 V. Delegation of Authority ................................................................................................... 3 VI. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest ........................................................................................ 4 VII. Internal Controls ............................................................................................................... 4 VIII. Authorized Financial Institutions, Depositories, and Broker/Dealers.............................. 5 IX. Authorized Investments.................................................................................................... 6 X. Prohibited Investment Vehicles and Practices ............................................................... 10 XI. Investment Pools/Mutual Funds ..................................................................................... 11 XII. Collateralization ............................................................................................................. 11 XIII. Delivery, Safekeeping and Custody ............................................................................... 11 XIV. Maximum Maturity ........................................................................................................ 12 XV. Risk Management and Diversification ........................................................................... 12 XVI. Review of Investment Portfolio ..................................................................................... 13 XVII. Performance Evaluation ................................................................................................. 13 XVIII. Reporting ........................................................................................................................ 14 XIX. Review of Investment Policy ......................................................................................... 15
2 I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this investment policy is to identify various policies and procedures that will foster a prudent and systematic investment program designed to seek the City of Gardena objectives of safety, liquidity and return on investment thr ough a diversified investment portfolio. This policy also serves to organize and formalize the City of Gardena’s investment -related activities, while complying with all applicable statu tes governing the investment of public funds. This policy is written to incorporate industry best practices and recommendations from sources such as the Government Finance Officers Association ( GFOA), California Municipal Treasurers Association ( CMTA), California Debt and Investment Advisory Commiss ion (CDIAC) and the Association of Public Treasurers (APT).
This investment policy was endorsed and adopted by the City of Gardena’s City Council and is effective as of the 1st day of July, 2022, and replaces any previous versions.
II. S
COPE
This policy covers all funds and investment activities under the direct authority of the City of Gardena, as set forth in the State Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq., with the following exceptions:
• Proceeds of debt issuance shall be invested in acco rdance with the City of Gardena’s general investment philosophy as set forth in this policy; however, such proceeds are to be invested pursuant to the permitted investment provisions of their specific bond indentures.
• Any other funds specifically exempted by the City Council.
P
OOLING OF FUNDS
Except for cash in certain restricted and special funds, the City of Gardena will consolidate cash and res erve balances from all funds to maximize investment earnings and to increase efficiencies with regard to investment pricing, safekeeping and administration. Investment income will be allocated to the various funds based on their respective participation and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
III. P
RUDENCE
Pursuant to California Government Code, Section 53600.3, all persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of the City of Gardena are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the Prudent Investor Standard:
“…all governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore fiduciaries s ubject to the prudent investor standard. W hen investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, 3 prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the Agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquid ity needs of the Agency. Within the limitations of this section and considering individual investments as part of an overall strategy, investments may be acquired as authorized by law.”
The Treasurer and other au thorized persons responsible for managing City of Gardena funds acting in accordance with this investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes provided that the Treasurer or other authorize d persons acted in good faith.
Deviations from expectations of a security’s credit or market risk should be reported to the governing body in a timely fashion and appro priate action should be taken to control adverse developments.
IV. O
BJECTIVES
The City of Gardena’s overall investment program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism worthy of the public trust. The overriding objectives of the program are to preserve principal, provide sufficient liquidity, and manage investment risks, while seeking a market-rate of return.
• S
AFETY. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program.
Investments will be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To attain this objective, the City of Gardena will diversify its investments by investing funds among a variety of securities with independent returns.
• L
IQUIDITY. The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated.
• RETURN ON INVESTMENTS. The investment portfolio will be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the invest ment risk constraints f or safety and liquidity needs.
V. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
Authority to manage the City of Gardena ’s investment program is derived from California Government Code, Sections 41006 and 53600 et seq.
The City Council is responsible for the management of the City of Gardena ’s funds, including the administration of this investment policy. Management responsibility for the cash management of the City of Gardena’s funds is hereby delegated to the Treasurer or other authorized persons.
4 The Treasurer, or his/her designee, will be responsible for all transactions undertaken and will establish a system of procedures and controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials and employees. Such procedures will include explicit delegation of a uthority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer.
The City of Gardena may engage the services o f one or more external inve stment advisers, who are registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, to assist in the management of the City of Gardena ’s investment portfolio in a manner consistent with the City of Gardena’s objectives. External investment advisers may be granted discretion to purchase and sell investment securities in accordance with this investment policy.
The City of Gardena's overall investment program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. The City of Gardena recognizes that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses may be inevitable and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio’s return and the cash flow requirements of the City of Gardena.
VI. E
THICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust.
Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. Thus, employees and officials involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could create a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions.
Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the City Manager, or his/her designee, any material interests in financial institutions with which they conduct business, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the investment portfolio . Employees and officers shall refrain from undertaking any personal investment transactions with the same individual with whom business is conducted on behalf of the Agency.
VII. I
NTERNAL CONTROLS
The City Treasurer, or his/her designee, is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the entity are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable ass urance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management.
5 Periodically, as deemed appropriate by the City of Gardena and/or the City Council , an independent analysis by an external auditor shall be conducted to review internal controls, account activity and compliance with policies and procedures.
VIII. AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, DEPOSITORIES, AND BROKER/DEALERS
To the extent practicable, the Treasurer, or his/her designee, shall endeavor to complete investment transactions using a competitive bid process whenever possible. The City of Gardena’s Treasurer, or his/her designee, will determine which financial ins titutions are authorized to provide investment services to the City of Gardena . It shall be the City of Gardena’s policy to purchase securities only from authorized institutions and firms.
The Treasurer, or his/her designee, shall maintain procedures for establishing a list of authorized broker/dealers and financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes that are selected through a process of due diligence as determined by the City of Gardena. Due inquiry shall determine whe ther such a uthorized broker/dealers, and the individuals covering the City of Gardena are reputable and trustworthy, knowledgeable and ex perienced in Public Agency investing and able to meet all of their financial obligations. T hese institutions may include "primary" dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c 3-1 (uniform net capital rule).
In accordance with Section 53601.5, i nstitutions eligible to transact investment business with the City of Gardena include:
• Primary government dealers as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank and non- primary government dealers.
• Nationally or state-chartered banks.
• The Federal Reserve Bank.
• Direct issuers of securities eligible for purchase.
Selection of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to engage in transactions will be at the sole discretion of the City of Gardena , except where the City of Gardena utilizes an external investment adviser in which case the Agency may rely on the adviser for selection.
All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions (and which are not dealing only with the investment adviser) must supply the Treasurer, or his/her designee, with audited financials and a statement certifying that the institution has reviewed the California Government Code , Section 53600 et seq . and the City of Gardena’s investment policy. The Treasurer, or his/her designee, will conduct an annual review of the financial condition and registrations of such qualified bidders.
Public deposits will be made only in qualified public depositories as established by State law. Deposits will be ins ured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or, to the 6 extent the amount exceeds the insured maximum, will be collateralized in accordance with State law.
Selection of broker/dealers used by an external investment adviser retained by the City of Gardena will be at the sole discretion of the adviser. Where possible, transactions with broker/dealers shall be selected on a competitive basis and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded. If there is no other readily available competitive offering, best efforts will be made to document quotations for comparable or alternative securities. When purchasing original issue instrumentality securities, no competitive offerings will be required as all dealers in the selling group offer those securities a t the same original issue price.
IX. A
UTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
The City of Gardena ’s investments are governed by California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq . Within the investments permitted by the Code, the City of Gardena seeks to further restrict eligible investments to the guidelines listed below. In the event a discrepancy is found between this policy and the Code, the more restrictive parameters will take precedence. Percentage holding limits listed in this section app ly at the time the security is purchased.
Any investment currently held at the time the policy is adopted which does not meet the new policy guidelines can be held until maturity, and shall be exempt from the current policy. At the time of the investment’s maturity or liquidation, such f unds shall be reinvested only as provided in the current policy.
An appropriate risk level shall be maintained by primarily purchasing securities that are of high quality, liquid, and marketable. The portfolio shall be di versified by security type and ins titution to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual issuers.
1. M
UNICIPAL SECURITIES include obligations of the City of Gardena , the State of California and any local agency within the State of California, provided that:
• The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”). • No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • No more than 30% of the portfolio may be in Municipal Securities. • The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
2. MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (REGISTERED TREASURY NOTES OR BONDS ) of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.
• The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”). 7 • No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • No more than 30% of the portfolio may be in Municipal Securities. • The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
3. U.S. TREASURIES and other government obligations for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City of Gardena may invest in U.S. Treasuries, provided that:
• The maximum maturity is five (5) years.
4. FEDERAL AGENCIES or United States Government -Sponsored Enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including t hose issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government -sponsored enterprises. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City of Gardena may invest in Federal Agency or Governmen t-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), provided that:
• No more than 25% of the portfolio may be invested in any single Agency/GSE issuer.
• The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
• The maximum percent of agency callable securities in the portfolio will be 20%.
5. B
ANKER’S ACCEPTANCES, provided that:
• They are issued by institutions which have short -term debt obligations rated “A - 1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO ; or long- term debt obligations which are rated in a rating category of “A” o r its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
• No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Banker’s Acceptances. • No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • The maximum maturity does not exceed 180 days.
6. COMMERCIAL PAPER, provided that:
• The issuer is a corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets in excess of $500 million.
• The securities are rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO. • They are issued by corporations which ha ve long- term obligatio ns rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO. • City of Gardena may purchase no more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer.
• No more than 25% of the portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper. • No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • The maximum maturity does not exceed 270 days.
7. N
EGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCDS), issued by a nationally or state - chartered bank, a savings associa tion or a federal association, a state or federal credit 8 union, or by a federally licensed or state -licensed branch of a foreign bank, provided that:
• The amount of the NCD insured up to the FDIC limit does not require any credit ratings.
• Any amount above the FDIC in sured limit must be issued by institutions which have short-term debt obligations rated “A -1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO; or long- term obligations rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
• No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in NCDs (combined with CDARS).
• No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
8. FEDERALLY INSURED TIME DEPOSITS (Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit) in state or federally chartered banks, savings and loans, or credit unions, provided that:
• The amount per institution is limited to the maximum covered under federal insurance.
• No more than 20% of the portfolio wi ll be invested in a combination of federally insured and collateralized time deposits.
• The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
9. C
OLLATERALIZED TIME DEPOSITS (Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit) in state or federally chartered banks, savings a nd loans, or credit unions in excess of insured amounts which are fully collateralized with securities in accordance with California law, provided that:
• No more than 20% of the portfolio will be invested in a combination of federally insured and collateralized time deposits.
• The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
10. C
ERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT PLACEMENT SERVICE (CDARS), provided that:
• No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in a combination of Certificates of Deposit, including CDARS.
• The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
11. COLLATERALIZED BANK DEPOSITS. City of Gardena ’s deposits with financial institutions will be collateralized with pledged securities per California Government Code, Section 53651. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City of Gardena may invest in collateralized bank deposits.
12. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF), provided that:
• The City of Gardena may invest up to the maximum amount permitted by LAIF. • LAIF’s investments in instruments prohibited by or not specified in the City of Gardena’s policy do not exclude the investment in LAIF itself from the City of 9 Gardena’s list of allowable investments, provided LAIF’s reports allow the Treasurer to adequately judge the risk inherent in LAIF’s portfolio.
13. LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS
• Other LGIPs permitted by client.
• There is no issuer limitation for Local Government Investment Pools
14. C
ORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES (MTNS), provided that:
• The issuer is a corporation organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States.
• The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
• No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in MTNs. • No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
15. A
SSET-BACKED, MORTGAGE-BACKED, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH SECURITIES, AND COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS, provided that:
• The securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.
• No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities. • No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single Asset-Backed or Commercial Mortgage security issuer. There is no issuer limitation on any Mortgage security where the issuer is the US Treasury or a Federal Agency/GSE. • The maximum legal final maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
16. MUTUAL FUNDS AND MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940, provided that:
a. MUTUAL FUNDS that invest in the securities and obligations as authorized under California Government Code, Section 53601 (a) to (k) and (m) to (q) inclusive and that meet either of the following criteria:
1. Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two (2) NRSROs; or
2. Have retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years’ experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by California Government Code, S ection 53601 and with assets under management in excess of $500 million.
3. No more than 10% of the total portfolio may be invested in shares of any one mutual fund.
10 b. MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the I nvestment Company Act of 1940 and issued by diversified management companies and meet either of the following criteria:
1. Have attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two (2) NRSROs; or
2. Have retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less t han five years’ experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of $500 million.
3. No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in the shares of any one Money Market Mutual Fund.
c. No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities.
17. S
UPRANATIONALS, provided that:
• Issues are US dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubor dinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Developm ent, International Finance Corporation, or Inter -American Development Bank.
• The securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.
• No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities. • No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. • The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.
18. INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA (CalTrust)
• The City may invest in shares issued by CALTRUST in accordance with Section 53601 (p) of the Government Code. CalTrust is a joint power authority created for the benefit of local agencies.
19. LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOLED INVESTMENT FUND (LACPIF)
• The City may in vest in shares issued by LACPIF in accordance with Section 53601 (p) of the Government Code. LACPIF is a joint power authority created for the benefit of local agencies.
X. P
ROHIBITED INVESTMENT VEHICLES AND PRACTICES
• State law notwithstand ing, any investme nts not specifically described herein are prohibited, including, but not limited to futures and options. • In accordance with Government Code, Section 53601.6, investment in inverse floaters, range notes, or mortgage derived interest-only strips is prohibited. • No surplus city funds shall be invested in any repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, derivatives or noncollateralized corporate notes • Investment in any security that could result in a zero interest accrual if held to maturity is prohibit ed. Under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026, securities backed by the U.S. Government that could result in a zero- or negative -interest accrual if held to maturity are permitted.
11 • Trading securities for the sole purpose of speculati ng on the future direction of interest rates is prohibited.
• Purchasing or selling securities on margin is prohibited. • The purchase of foreign currency denominated securities is prohibited.
XI. INVESTMENT POOLS/MUTUAL FUNDS
The City of Gardena shall conduct a thorough investigation of any pool or mutual fund prior to making an investment, and on a continual basis thereafter. The Treasurer shall develop a questionnaire which will answer the following general questions:
1. A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives.
2. A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated.
3. A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited.
4. A description of who may invest in the program, how often, what size deposit and withdrawal are allowed.
5. A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings.
6. Are reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool/fund?
7. A fee schedule, and when and how is it assessed.
8. Is the pool/fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds? XII. C
OLLATERALIZATION
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (CDS). The City of Gardena shall require any commercial bank or savings and loan association to deposit eligible securities with an agency of a depository approved by the State Banking Department to secure any uninsured portion of a Non -Negotiable Certificate of Deposit. The value of eligibl e securities as defined pursuant to California Government Code, Section 53651, pledged against a Certificate of Deposit shall be equal to 150% of the face value of the CD if the securities are classified as mortgages and 110% of the face value of the CD for all other classes of security.
C
OLLATERALIZATION OF BANK DEPOSITS. This is the process by which a bank or financial institution pledges securities, or other deposits for the purpose of securing repayment of deposited funds. The City of Gardena shall require any bank or financial institution to comply with the collateralization criteria defined in California Government Code, Section 53651.
XIII. D
ELIVERY, SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY
DELIVERY-VERSUS-PAYMENT (DVP). All investment transactions shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment basis.
12 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY. To prot ect against potential losses due to failure of individual securities dealers, and to enhance access to securities, interest payments and maturity proceeds, all cash and securities in the City of Gardena’s portfolio shall be held in safekeeping in the City of Gardena ’s name by a third party custodian, acting as agent for the City of Gardena under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and the City of Gardena . All investment tran sactions will require a safekeeping receipt or acknowledgment generated from the trade. A monthly report will be received by the City of Gardena from the custodian listing all securities held in safekeeping with current market data and other information.
The only exceptions to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and securities purchases made with: (i) local government investment pools; (ii) time certificates of deposit, and, (iii) money mutual funds, since the purchased securities are not deliverable.
XIV. M
AXIMUM MATURITY
To the extent possible, investments shall be matched with anticipated cash flow requirements and known future liabilities.
The City of Gardena will not invest in securities maturing more than five (5) years from the date of trade settlement, unless the City Council has by resolution granted authority to make such an investment.
XV. R
ISK MANAGEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION
MITIGATING CREDIT RISK IN THE PORTFOLIO
Credit risk is the risk that a security or a portfolio will lose some or all of its value due to a real or perceived change in the ability of the issuer to repay its debt. The City of Gardena will mitigate credit risk by adopting the following strategies:
• The diversification requirements included in the “Authorized Investments” s ection of this policy are designed to mitigate credit risk in the portfolio.
• No more than 5% of the total portfolio may be deposited with or invested in securities issued by any single issuer unless otherwise specified in this policy.
• The City of Gardena may elect to sell a security prior to its maturity and record a capital gain or loss in order to manage the quality, liquidity or yield of the portfolio in response to market conditions or City of Gardena’s risk preferences.
• If securities owned by the City of Gardena are downgraded by a n NRSRO to a level below the quality required by this investment policy, it will be the City of Gardena’s policy to review the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio.
13 • If a security is downgraded, the Treasurer will use discretion in determining whether to sell or hold the security based on it s current maturity, the economic outlook for the issuer, and other relevant factors.
• If a decision is made to retain a downgraded security in the portfolio, its presence in the portfolio will be monitored and reported monthly to the City Council.
MITIGATING MARKET RISK IN THE PORTFOLIO
Market risk is the risk that the portfolio value will fluctuate due to changes in the general level of interest rates. The City of Gardena recognizes that, over time, longer -term portfolios have the potential to achieve higher returns. On the other hand, longer -term portfolios have higher volatility of return. The City of Gardena will mitigate market risk by providing adequate liquidity for short -term cash needs, and by making longer -term investments only with funds that are not needed for current cash flow purposes.
The City of Gardena further recognizes that certain types of securiti es, including variable rate securities, securities with principal paydowns prior to maturity, and securities with embedded options, will affect the market risk profile of the portfolio differently in different interest rate environments. The City of Gardena , therefore, adopts the following strategies to control and mitigate its exposure to market risk:
• The City of Gardena will maintain a minimum of six months of budgeted operating expenditures in short term investments to provide sufficient liquidity for e xpected disbursements.
• The maximum stated final maturity of individual securities in the portfolio will be five (5) years, except as otherwise stated in this policy.
• The duration of the portfolio will generally be approximately equal to the duration (typically, plus or minus 20%) of a Market Benchmark, an index selected by the City of Gardena based on the City of Gardena’s investment objectives, constraints and risk tolerances.
XVI. R
EVIEW OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
The Treasurer shall periodically, but no less than quarterly, review the portfolio to identify investments that do not comply with this investment policy and establish protocols for reporting major and critical incidences of noncompliance to the City Council.
XVII. P
ERFORMANCE EVALUATION
The investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market -average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the City of Gardena ’s 14 risk constraints, the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio, and state and local l aws, ordinances or resolutions that restrict investments.
The Treasurer shall monitor and evaluate the portfolio’s performance relative to the chosen market benchmark(s), which will be included in the Treasurer’s quarterly report.
The Treasurer shall sel ect an appropriate, r eadily available index to use as a market benchmark.
XVIII. REPORTING
M
ONTHLY REPORTS
Monthly transaction reports will be submitted by the Treasurer to the City Council within 30 days of the end of the reporting period in accordance with California Government Code Section 53607.
Q
UARTERLY REPORTS
The Treasurer will submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council which provides full disclosure of the City of G ardena’s investment activities within 30 days after the end of the quarter. These reports will disclose, at a minimum, the following information about the City of Gardena’s portfolio:
1. An asset listing showing par value, cost and independent third- party fair market value of each security as of the date of the report , the source of the valuation, type of investment, issuer, maturity date, interest rate and interest rate.
2. Transactions for the period.
3. A description of the funds, investments and programs (including lending programs) managed by contracted parties (i.e. LAIF; investment pools, outsi de money managers and securities lending agents)
4. A one-page summary report that shows:
a. Average maturity of the portfolio and modified duration of the portfolio; b. Maturity distribution of the portfolio;
c. Percentage of the portfolio represented by each investment category; d. Average portfolio credit quality; and,
e. Time-weighted total rate o f return for the portfolio for the prior one month, three months, twelve months and since inception compared to the City of Gardena ’s market benchmark returns for the same periods;
5. A statement of compliance with investment policy, including a schedule of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California Government Code, including a justification for their presence in the portfolio and a timetable for resolution.
6. A statement that the City of Gardena has adequate funds to meet its cash flow requirements for the next six months.
City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 11.C
Section: DEPARTMENTAL
ITEMS - ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
Meeting Date: June 28, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:
RESOLUTION NO. 6587
, Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal
Year 2022-2023 (GANN Limit)
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Staff Recommendation: Conduct Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 6587 which establishes the City's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 at $132,903,741, as required by Article XIII (B) of the California Constitution.
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:
In 1979, Proposition 4, known as the Gann Initiative, was approved by the voters. As a result, Article XIII (B) of the state statute (Government Code, Section 7900-10) was enacted and requires that each year thereafter the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its Appropriations Limit for the following year. Proposition 111, approved by the voters in 1990, amended Article XIII (B) further, and Council action is necessary to implement the amendments effective for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The amendments of Proposition 111 specify that the annual adjustment factor in calculating the Appropriations Limit will be increased by:
The change in population growth for the City
OR
County, whichever has the higher
population growth rate
The change in California per capita personal income
OR
The growth in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction within the City.
Pursuant to Proposition 111 amendments and upon Council approval, staff has calculated the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Appropriations Limit using the County's population change and the percentage change in per capita personal income in California.
The Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 is $132,903,741 with appropriations of $76,616,761 subject to the limit, leaving a remaining appropriations capacity of $56,286,980.
The Appropriations Limit calculation formula is attached as reference (Exhibit A).
The Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 was publicly noticed in the Gardena Valley News on June 16, 2022.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 6587, which establishes the Gann Limit for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 at $132,903,741.
FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:
Appropriations Limit: $132,903,741 Funding Source: All Revenue Sources Remaining Appropriations Capacity: $56,286,980 ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 6587 - Gann Limit FY22-23 with Exhibit.pdf
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 6587
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ITS APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the Government Code section 7910 requires the City Council to establish its appropriations limit pursuant to Article XIII B of the State Constitution; and
WHEREAS, said appropriations limit for fiscal year 2022- 2023 has now been calculated to be $132,903,741.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the spending limit calculation for fiscal year 2022 -2023 is set forth in “Exhibit A” attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth. The annual adjustment factors used in making such calculation are the cost of living adjustment – CPI based on the percentage change in California per capita income and the population adjustment based on the annual population change for Los Angeles County.
“The City of Gardena reserves the right to change or revise any growth factors associated with the calculation of the Proposition 111 limit if such changes or revisions would result in a more advantageous appropriations limit.”
SECTION 2. That this Resolution shall be effective immediately.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
Passed, approved, and adopted this 28
th day of June 2022.
TASHA CERDA, Mayor
ATTEST:
MINA SEMENZA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CARMEN VASQUEZ, City Attorney
RESOLUTION 6587 EXHIBIT A
CA
LCULATION OF THE GANN LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF GARDENA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSITION III AND ARTICLE XIII (B) EX
ECUTIVE SUMMARY: In November 1979, the voters of California approved Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Initiative. This proposition created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution placing limits on the amount of revenue that can be appropriated by all government entities in any fiscal year. The legislation mandates all governing bodies including the City of Gardena to annually establish the Appropriations Limit.
F
ISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the City of Gardena budget. The fiscal year 2022-2023 Appropriations Limit is $132,903,741 and will exceed the estimated General Fund spending plan of $76,616,761 in an amount of $56,286,980.
Amount & Calculation Source
A
. Appropriations Limit Fiscal Year 2021-2022 $124,453,358 Prior Fiscal Year B. Calculation Factors:
1) P
opulation decrease factor - .71% -0.71 + 100
(Los Angeles County) 100
7.55 + 100
100
C. Calculated Factor for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 0.9929 x 1.0755 = 1.0679 B(1) x B(2) D. Appropriations Limit Fiscal Year 2022-2023 $124,453,358 x 1.0679 = $132,903,741 A x C E. Annual Adjustment Increase: $8,450,383 D - A
2) Per Capita Cost of Living Change - 7.55% = 1.0755 State Department of Finance
CITY OF GARDENA
Appropriations Limit Schedule
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023
= 0.9929 State Department of Finance
S
TAFF ANALYSIS:
Appropriations subject to the Limit for the prior fiscal year 2021- 2022 totaled $66,865,341 against the Adopted Limit of $124,453,358 for that year.
FY 2022-2023 Appropriations Limit $132,903,741
F
Y 2022-2023 Adopted Budget Subject to Limit (*) 76,616,761 Remaining Appropriation Capacity (Deficit) $56,286,980
Available Capacity as a Percentage of Appropriation Limit 42.3517% (*) Actual Appropriations Subject to Limit
Fund# 010 - General Fund FY 2022-2023 Adopted Budget: $76,616,761
CITY OF GARDENA
Calculation on FY 2022-2023 Budget
Against
FY 2022-2023 Appropriations Limit
City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 11.D
Section: DEPARTMENTAL
ITEMS - ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
Meeting Date: June 28, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:
Authorization to Bind Excess Insurance Coverage Policies for Fiscal Year 2022-2023
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Staff Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to Purchase and Bind Excess Insurance Coverage
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:
Gardena is self-insured for General Liability and Workers Compensation insurance and obtains excess insurance coverage for extraordinary exposures for both, in addition to Commercial Property, Contractor’s Equipment insurance, and a crime bond for employees. Staff annually seeks renewal quotations and works diligently to ensure that adequate coverage is obtained at the best possible price.
This year insurance quotes were obtained through the City’s Joint Powers Authority (JPA) PRISM, formerly CSAC-EIA and for GTRANS liability insurance and vehicle physical damage insurance through their JPA ; California Transit Indemnity Pool (CalTip). The quote received from PRISM was an estimated premium of $1,052,685, which represented an increase of 8.59% or $83,234 compared to the prior year.
The quote received from CalTip was an estimated premium of $608,798, which represented an increase of 38.2% or $168,121 compared to the prior year. The quote received recommended coverage for fiscal year 2022-2023 and background details on these excess insurance policies is outlined in detail in the attached staff report.
In conclusion, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of the excess insurance coverage for fiscal year 2022-2023 at a total estimated cost of $1,757,151 (including a Broker Fee of $95,668) through the specified carriers and authorize the City Manager to execute the documents to bind the insurance policies.
FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:
Liability Fund
$881,536
Workers
Compensation
Fund
$102,642
GTrans Fund
$772,973
Total Estimated
Expenditures
$1,757,151
ATTACHMENTS:
Agenda Staff Report - Insurance.pdf
TYPE OF INSURANCE.pdf
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: AUTHORIZATION TO BIND EXCESS INSURANCE COVERAGE POLICIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully recommends that Council app rove the renewal of excess insurance policies for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 at an estimated total cost of $1,757,151 as specified in the summary of excess insurance coverage for Fiscal Year 2022- 2023. This is an increase to the City portion of premium is approximately 8.59% or $83,234 . The increase to the GTrans ( CalTIP) premium is 38.2% or $168,121. This figure is not reflective of the City’s loss history, but rather current market conditions as detailed in the background below.
Background:
In July 2018 the City joined t he CSAC-EIA, now known as PRISM, a risk sharing pool of California public agencies, dedicated to controlling losses and providing effective risk management solutions.
Through efforts of PRISM ’s member entities, the PRISM staff, and its l ong-term p artner, Alliant, PRISM has created risk coverage programs that are stable, secure and flex ible. PRISM is recognized as a leader and pioneer in the JPA risk management community. PRISM is the first JPA in California to receive the Government Finance O fficers Association’s Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting since June 30, 1994. Additionally, PRISM has been accredited with excellence continuously since 1989 by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA).
General liability and vehicle physical damage insurance for GTrans is procured through the California Transit Systems Joint Powers Authority, also known as the California Transit Indemnity Pool (CalTIP).
The pool is the result of the cooperative efforts of public transit operators acting collect ively to meet their insurance needs. CalTIP was created in 1987 and began providing a liability coverage progr am for its 12 initial members. Since that time, CalTIP has added a Vehicle Physical Damage Program and has expanded its scope of services to meet the needs of its members.
The insuranc e market has faced many challenges over the past 24 months. Global catastrophic events and years of low rates have created some instability in the overall marketplace. While there is still cap acity in the market, some lines of coverage have been impacted m ore hea vily tha n others which is a result of reduced profit, large claims payments and historic low rates – the market is currently working on stabilizing itself.
Property
The commercial property market is continuing to go through a market “correction” because losses are significantly eroding their profits. Several carriers are exiting or significantly reducing capacity in areas prone to Natural Catastrophe (CAT). The combination of attritional losses with CAT losses in the past several years is resulting in pricing inflations as well as coverage limitations. Adding insult to injury, many of the C AT losses of 2017 (the worst CA T year in history) and 2018 (the 4th largest loss year) continue to include higher than expected loss development. We saw this carry through 2019 and are
2 seeing it through 2022 due to claims resulting from COVID-19. Overall, there has been a decrease in property capacity.
Casualty
Beyond property insurance rates being on the rise, we are beginning to see a significant shift in the liability market as well. This shift is a result of record jury verdicts happening across the country that have increas ed at a pace none of the underwriting community could have ever planned for. This trend has hit the public sector especially hard. What would have resulted in a $300,000 award for individuals in years past is going for $3-$5 million, if not higher.
Deteriorating loss trends characterized by increased frequency of severity losses has caused markets to exit certain lines of business, reduce their capacity and rais e rates considerably, and this is cuttin g across all industries and cl assifications regardless of tenure with markets or past loss history. While we are hopeful rates wi ll begin to level off in the latter part of 2022 , we don’t expect aggressive competition for premium dollars to manifest itself, at least to the degree necessary to begin stabilizing the marketplace. As a consequence, insureds are looking to absorb more ri sk themselves in order to offset the rate increases.
Workers’ Compensation
Workers’ Compensation, by contrast, is the lone casualty line in which a competitive market exists for most industries in most states. Workplace injuries continue to decline year o ver year and loss ratios remain favorable and the majority of states continue to approv e rate reductions, even with the effects of COVID-19 in the workplace, rates have remained stable.
Summary
In summary, the insurance market is changing. The inc rease i n rates and changes to terms and conditions is driv en primarily by an increase in losses, but also partly to prepare for future losses.
Property rates are incre asing 15% -30% for “good” non -cat exposed accounts and much higher for accounts with losses or that are in CAT prone areas. Liability carriers have cut back their willingness to offer high limits but are not giving any reductions for lower limit structures . As we look into the future, much of the volatility of the market will be driven by c laims experience and carriers ability to offset claims wit h investment income. Both of these f actors need to improve for stability to return to the insurance marketplace.
SUMMARY OF EXCESS INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR FY 2022-2023:
• Liability insur ance for the City will be offered through the CSAC-EIA Program Altern ative (PRISM). The total estimated premium for the policy is $692,718 for $45,000,000 of coverage with a $750,000 SIR.
• Liability insurance for GTrans will be offered through the California Transit Indemnity Pool (CalTIP). The total premium for the policy is $555,087 for $2 5,000,000 of cove rage with a $250,000 SIR.
• Excess Workers Compensation will be of fered through the CSAC-EIA Program Alternative (PRISM). The total estimated annual premium for the policy is $150,892. o City portion of premium is $97,054 SIR $750,000
o GTrans portion of premium is $53,838 SIR $750,000
3 • Commercial Property insurance (including Contractor’s Equipment , Cyber Liability and Pollution) will be offered through the Alliant Property I nsurance Program (APIP). The total premium for the policy is $200,107 for $100,000,000 of coverage with a $25,000 deductible. o City portion of premium is $134,072
o GTrans portion of premium is $ 66,035
• Vehicle Physical Damag e insurance for GTrans will be offered through the California Transit Indemnity Pool (CalTIP) . The total premium for the policy is $ 53,711 for $56,000,000 of coverage with a $10,000 deductible.