Agenda packet — Glendale City Council, July 11, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T Uverse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live, on YouTube.com/myglendale, and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices usinga free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at glendaleca.gov/agendas. Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. For public comments and questions during the meeting, call (818) 937-8100. Public comments ona specific agenda item will be taken when that agenda item is discussed. If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E.

Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (818) 548-2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please specify the language for which you require translation. The exclusive use of City provided interpreters is not required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.

JULY 11, 2023

ROLL CALL

1. CLOSED SESSION – 1:00 PM (To Commence at 3:00 PM)
a. Conference with Labor Negotiators. The City-designated negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Paula Adams, Aymee Martin, and Jason Bradford. The names of the employee organizations are: Glendale City Employees’ Association, Glendale Management Association, Glendale Police Officers’ Association, Glendale Fire 1 TYPED 7/6/2023 11:01:05 AM
07 11 23
CC
Fighters Association and I.B.E.W., Local 18, Unit 40. Unrepresented Employees:

Executives and Confidential Employees
b. Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Manager c. Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Attorney

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Dan Brotman
b. Invocation: Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the July 11, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on Thursday, July 6, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, July 18, 2023

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Special City Council and Regular City Council Meetings of June 27, 2023
b. Community Development, re: Professional Service Agreement Contract Amendment to Increase Maximum Cost of Contract with Overland Pacific & Cutler by $300,000

1. Motion authorizing amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Overland Pacific & Cutler to increase the maximum cost by $300,000 for a new not-to-exceed amount of $616,778 over an additional two-year term
c. Fire Department, re: Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation InterGovernmental Transfer (PP-GEMT-IGT) Program

1. Motion authorizing the Glendale Fire Department to participate in the Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer (PPGEMT-IGT) program that was established by Assembly Bill 1705; authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute grant documents on behalf of the City; and approve the City’s proportional amount of the non-federal matching funds

2. Resolution of Appropriation
d. Police Department, re: State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program, Grant Funds in the amount of $389,966 to reduce and mitigate the impacts of impaired driving in local communities

1. Motion to accept grant funds in the amount of $389,966 and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California – Department of California Highway Patrol for the award of funds under the California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Law Enforcement Grant Program
e. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for Independent Expert Review Services Related to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Permit Applications

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Telecom Law Firm (TLF) to provide 2 TYPED 7/6/2023 11:01:05 AM
07 11 23
CC
Independent Expert Review Services Related to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTF) Permit Applications in the amount of $450,000 for a duration of three years from the date of the contract execution with an option to extend the contract for two additional one-year terms at $150,000 per year

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS
a. Public Works, re: Contract for the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride Transit Services

1. Resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the Beeline fixed-route agreement for a one-year period for a not to exceed the amount of $12,234,395 and to amend the Dial-A-Ride service operation and maintenance agreement with MV Transportation, Inc. for a one-year period for a not to exceed amount of $1,025,578, for a total amount of $13,259,973

2. Resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with MV Transportation, Inc. for the operation and maintenance of the City’s Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services in a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a six-year term, with two, two-year extension options; if the 1st option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $106,245,519 for a total eight-year term; and, if the 2nd option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $137,828,127 for a total ten-year term b. City Attorney, re: Initial Review of Proposed Subject Matter of Charter Amendments Pertaining to a Directly Elected Mayor, Council Districts, Councilmember Compensation, Contract Procurement and Miscellaneous Changes to the City Charter

1. Motion Directing Staff to Commence Drafting Charter Amendments c. Management Services, re: Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Denouncing Antisemitism and all Forms of Hatred and Prejudice

1. Resolution Denouncing Antisemitism and all forms of hatred and prejudice

9. HEARINGS
a. Public Works, re: Approval of the Final Engineer’s Report and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Annual Assessments for the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24

1. Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the City of Glendale’s North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24

2. Resolution Ordering the Levy and Collection of the City of Glendale’s North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24 b. Community Development, re: Ordinance for Introduction of Amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Regarding Hotel Uses, As Directed by City Council on February 7, 2023 (General Plan Amendment Case No. PGPA-001238-2023)

1. Ordinance for Introduction Amending the DSP
3 TYPED 7/6/2023 11:01:05 AM
07 11 23
CC
c. City Attorney, re: Second Public Hearing Regarding the Composition of Council Districts Related to the City's Proposed Transition to District-Based Councilmember Elections

1. Motion Directing Staff Regarding Preparation of Draft District Maps d. Community Development, re: Appeal of Design Review Board’s Approval of Design Review Case No. PDR-2201810 located at 1650 Hazbeth Lane to construct a new 3,239 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence and a detached 997 squarefoot, three-car garage

1. Motion to sustain the Design Review Board’s decision to approve the Design Review Application with conditions

2. Motion to continue the matter, directing the City Attorney to draft findings reversing the Design Review Board’s decision and denying the Project

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes.

Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision.

The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

14. NEW BUSINESS

15. ADJOURNMENT
4 TYPED 7/6/2023 11:01:05 AM
07 11 23
CC
1 M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
JUNE 27, 2023
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Hall Council Chambers, in said City, at 4:04 p.m. on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

June 22, 2023
Date
A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, June 27, 2023, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. City Attorney, re: Authorization to Join Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management (PRISM) Joint Powers Authority and Annual Insurance Policy Renewals for Fiscal Year 2023-2024
a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with PRISM and memoranda of understanding for PRISM’s General Liability Program 2 and its Excess Workers’ Compensation Program b. Motion authorizing the annual renewal of liability insurance policies for the City's property, excess liability, workers' compensation, cyber liability, and other miscellaneous coverages for 2023-24 fiscal year, in an amount not-to-exceed $7,724,283.97

2. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for Parking Management Services a. Resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an amendment to professional services agreement (PSA) #C105715A with Modern Parking, Inc. for parking management services for four downtown Glendale parking facilities, extending the PSA duration for one year, and increasing the amount by $2,869,524
b. Resolution of appropriation for parking management services Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 p.m. June 22, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Paula Devine at 5:00 p.m. June 22, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 p.m. June 22, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 p.m. June 22, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 p.m. June 22, 2023 Glendale, CA Mayor Brotman called the meeting to order at 4:04 p.m.

ROLL CALL
- Absent: Najarian
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, June 27, 2023 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on Thursday, June 22, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall. 5 of 446
2 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presenting:

Ann Mauer, Chief Asst. City Attorney
a. Resolution 23-91 authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with PRISM and memoranda of understanding for PRISM’s General Liability Program 2 and its Excess Workers’ Compensation Program Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
b. Motion authorizing the annual renewal of liability insurance policies for the City's property, excess liability, workers' compensation, cyber liability, and other miscellaneous coverages for 2023-24 fiscal year, in an amount not-to-exceed $7,724,283.97 Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

2. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for Parking Management Services Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presenting:

Tad Dombroski, Parking Manager
a. Resolution 23-92 dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an amendment to professional services agreement (PSA) #C105715A with Modern Parking, Inc. for parking management services for four downtown Glendale parking facilities, extending the PSA duration for one year, and increasing the amount by $2,869,524
Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian
6 of 446
3 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent
Abstain:
b. Resolution 23-93 of appropriation for parking management services Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian
ADJOURNMENT- 4:20 p.m.

Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
7 of 446
1 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
June 13, 2023
ROLL CALL-Absent: Najarian

1. CLOSED SESSION – 4:21 p.m.
a. Conference with Labor Negotiators. The City-designated negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Gillian van Muyden, Paula Adams, Aymee Martin, Jason Bradford, Mark Young and Peter Brown. The names of the employee organizations are: Glendale City Employees’ Association, Glendale Management Association, Glendale Police Officers’ Association, Glendale Firefighters Association and I.B.E.W., Local 18, Unit 40.

Unrepresented Employees: Executives and Confidential Employees Chief Asst. City Attorney Gillian van Muyden indicated that action is not anticipated.

Council recessed to Closed Session at 4:22 p.m.

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:05 PM
Roll Call- Absent: Najarian
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Dan Brotman
b. Invocation: Rick Schechter, Temple Sinai
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the June 27, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, July 4, 2023 The regular Housing Authority and Council Meeting for July 4th have been cancelled. The next regular meeting will be on July 11, 2023.

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Joint City Council and Housing Authority, Special City Council, and Regular City Council Meetings of June 13, 2023, and the Special City Council Meeting of June 20, 2023
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
8 of 446
2 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
b. Public Works, re: Contract for Central Library Youth Spaces Renovations

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract with PCL Construction Services, Inc., for the Central Library Youth Services Renovation, per Specification No. 3888, in the amount of $6,527,157, plus a 10% contingency amount of $652,716
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

2. Resolution 23-105 of appropriation
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
c. Public Works, re: Contract Award for the Central Library Roof Replacement Project

1. Motion accepting Best Contracting Services, Inc.’s request to withdraw its bid and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract with AME Builders, Inc., for the Central Library Roof Replacement Project, per Specification No. 3942, in the amount of $2,846,900, plus a 10% contingency $284,690 Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
d. Glendale Water and Power, re: Shifting of Funds from Glendale Water and Power’s (GWP’s) Electric Depreciation Fund - GWP Projects

1. Resolution 23-94 of Appropriation to shift funds from Glendale Water & Power’s (GWP’s) Electric Depreciation Fund - GWP Projects: Project GWP00648AAES Vault Replacement to Electric Depreciation Fund; Projects GWP00642AA ES Pole Replacement Program in the amount of $150,000 and GWP00649AA ES Cable Replacement Program in the amount of $300,000 for a total amount of $450,000
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
9 of 446
3 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
e. Human Resources, re: Contract Award for Workers’ Compensation Third Party Administrator Services and Bill Review for all the City’s work-related injuries

1. Motion Authorizing City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Adminsure Inc. to provide Third Party Administrator services and Bill Review for all the City’s work-related injuries for a period of three years with two one-year options to renew
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
f. Public Works, re: Final Map for Tract No. 83215, for a 6-Unit Condominium Subdivision at 1029 Melrose Avenue

1. Resolution 23-95 Approving the Final Map for Tract No. 83215 Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
g. Public Works, re: Continuation of Glendale Beeline Participation in Metro’s Student Fareless System Initiative known as GoPass

1. Motion authorizing Glendale Beeline to continue accepting Metro’s Fareless System Initiative K-14 GoPass
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
h. Community Development, re: Appropriation of $500,000 in Grant Funds from California Department of Housing and Community Development, LEAP Planning Grants Program

1. Resolution 23-96 of Appropriation in the amount of $500,000 Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
i. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for Citywide Facilities Condition Assessment

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments, LLC (Bureau Veritas) for the Citywide Facilities Condition Assessment in the amount of $167,593, plus a 15% contingency of $25,139
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
10 of 446
4 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
j. Community Services and Parks, re: Supportive Services Program Grant Funds from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department

1. Motion authorizing acceptance of grant funds from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department in the amount of $45,087 for the Supportive Services Program for FY 2023-2024, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute all agreements certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement funding
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
k. Police Department, re: The County of Los Angeles Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund, Request for Authorization to Accept Grant Funds in the amount of $16,000 for prosecution and/or investigation of real estate fraud

1. Motion to approve the Glendale Police Department’s participation in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Program and to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept grant funds in the amount of $16,000, and to execute the necessary agreements, certifications, and other documents required to accept the grant funds
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

2. Resolution 23-97 of appropriation
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
l. Police Department, re: Donation of Police Tasers to the City of Arvin, California

1. Resolution 23-98 Declaring Six (6) Tasers (and related equipment) Outdated and Surplus Property and Authorizing their Donation to the City of Arvin, California
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
11 of 446
5 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
m. Community Services and Parks, re: Amendment Ten for FY 2023-24 Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department (AD) baseline funding allocation of $431,000 for Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) services

1. Motion authorizing acceptance of grant funds from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department in the amount of $431,000 for the Elderly Nutrition Program for FY2023-2024 and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment Ten to the County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department Contract Subaward Number ENP202106 Subaward period July 2020 – June 2024 to accept and implement Los Angeles County AD funding Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
n. Community Services and Parks, re: Request for Approval of Submission of Verdugo Workforce Development Board’s Application for Approval for local area subsequent designation and local board recertification

1. Motion to Approve submission of the Verdugo Workforce Development Board’s FY 2023-2024 and FY 2024-2025 application for local area subsequent designation and local board recertification to the Governor, State Workforce Development Board and Employment Development Department; and Authorize the Mayor and City Manager or a designee to execute all relevant agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents with contractors, vendors, the Governor, State of California, and the United States Department of Labor necessary for VWDB’s local area subsequent designation and local board recertification; and VWDB’s implementation of Career Services to residents and businesses in the Verdugo Workforce Development Area
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
Councilmember Kassakhian announced that Crescenta Valley will host its 16th Annual Fireworks Show for the 4th of July celebration. He asked council to adjourn in memory of former Mayor and Councilmember Carl Raggio. Kassakhian and Devine spoke fondly of Mr.

Raggio and extended their condolences to his family.

Councilmember Devine attended the Age of Learning Kick-Off Summer food truck luncheon, the Armenian School Foundation fundraising event, and the Glendale Education Foundation’s annual donor celebration. Devine also attended the Glendale Police Foundation Gala where they honored Dr. Patrick Wade, who was the president of the foundation for many years.

Councilmember Asatryan added that the Crescenta Valley fireworks Show is free for active military personnel and children under 7 years old.

Mayor Brotman extended his condolences to the Raggio family. He attended the Glendale 12 of 446
6 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Education Foundation’s annual donor celebration and the Armenian School Foundation fundraising event. He also attended the Bike Safety Day event held at the Pacific Community Center, which was sponsored by the City of Glendale, AAA of SoCal, and Walk ‘n Rollers. The Bike and Safety event was led by Senator Portantino who is an avid cyclist.

Brotman wished everyone a Happy 4th of July and asked the public to be safe.

Fire Chief Ernst stated selling fireworks in the city and some neighboring cities is illegal. He asked everyone to be safe and to report any illegal activities to Fire or Police Department.

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)
Raffi Joe Wartanian

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS
a. Community Services and Parks, re: Replacement of Gas-Powered Landscape Maintenance Equipment with Zero Emission Battery Powered Equipment for all Park Facilities in the City of Glendale to Achieve Green Zone Certification Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presenting:

Koko Panosian, Deputy Director of Community Services & Parks Dan Mabe, American Green Zone Alliance

1. Resolution 23-99 establishing standardization of manufacturers, dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the Purchasing Administrator to issue a Purchase Order to B&M Lawn & Garden in the amount of $208,355.05 for the purchase of STIHL and Husqvarna brand battery operated landscape maintenance equipment
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
b. Public Works, re: North Brand Boulevard Complete Streets Demonstration Project Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presenting:

Sarkis Oganesyan, Deputy Director of Public Works/ City Engineer Public Comments:

Mike Borisov
Alexander Yesayan
13 of 446
7 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Brotman
None
Najarian
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

1. Resolution 23-100 adopting the Plans and Specification for the North Brand Boulevard Complete Streets Demonstration Project, Specification No. 3942, Plan No. 1-3114; and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bid Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Devine
c. Public Works, re: Building Maintenance and Repair Services Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manger
Presenting:

Yazdan Emrani, Director of Public Works

1. Resolution 23-101 Adopting Specification No. 3945, for the Citywide Repairs and Maintenance of Elevator Systems at Various Facilities Project; and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise for Bids
Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian

2. Resolution 23-102 dispensing with competitive bidding and awarding a 5-year contract to Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. for the proprietary maintenance and repairs of Mitsubishi elevators at Police Building and Central Library Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian

3. Resolution 23-103 Adopting Specification No. 3946, for the Repair and Maintenance of Industrial Doors and Gates at Various City Facilities Project; and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise for Bids
Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian

4. Resolution 23-104 Adopting Specification No. 3949 for Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) Systems Repair and Maintenance at Various City Facilities Project; and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise for Bid
Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian
14 of 446
8 9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes. Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision.The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

Anastasia Khanyan
Ramella Eraghi
Allan Durham
Peter Perige
Alexander Yesayan
Joe

14. NEW BUSINESS

15. ADJOURNMENT– 7:27 p.m., in memory of the late and great Carl W. Raggio Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Devine
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
15 of 446
4b

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Service Agreement Contract Amendment to Increase Maximum Cost of Contract with Overland Pacific & Cutler by $300,000.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendale contracts with Overland Pacific and Cutler (“OPC”), for property management and acquisition services for various City and Housing Authority projects.

The City entered into a three-year professional services agreement with Overland Pacific and Cutler on December 22, 2020 for a not-to-exceed cost of $180,000 for such services. Subsequent amendments in 2021 and 2022 for Housing and Economic Development increased the not-to-exceed amount to $316,778. The intent of this staff report is to request an additional two-year term with OPC through December 21, 2025 and increasing the contract by $300,000, for a new not-to-exceed amount of $616,778. 16 of 446
2 b 4

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Services rendered by Overland Pacific and Cutler supports the activity of the Housing and Economic Development Divisions for Community Development Department.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize a contract amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Overland, Pacific and Cutler to increase the maximum cost by $300,000, for a new not-to-exceed amount of $616,778 over an additional two-year term.

BACKGROUND
The City of Glendale contracts for professional services with firms that offer specialized expertise. One such firm, Overland Pacific and Cutler (“OPC”), provides acquisition agent and property management services for various City and Housing Authority real estate acquisition projects. Specific services provided by OPC include appraisal preparation/analysis; preparation of notifications and offer letters; acquisition negotiations and escrow settlements; tenant relocation; and property management.

The City of Glendale entered into a professional services agreement with OPC on December 22, 2020, for a three-year term that ends on December 22, 2023, for a notto-exceed cost of $180,000. A contract amendment for the Housing Division was authorized in November of 2021 in the amount of $66,778 for services needed for the acquisition of Harrower Village affordable housing project at 912 E. Broadway; bringing the not-to-exceed amount to $246,778. In June 2022, staff requested a contract amendment in the amount of $70,000 in anticipation of property management and appraisal services prior to the expiration of the contract term in December 2023, bringing the not-to-exceed amount to $316,778.

ANALYSIS
As property management work continues, an extended term and contract maximum is requested to continue to provide services by Economic Development and Housing Divisions. This work includes property maintenance and management services for the Artsakh Street Retail Units, Museum of Neon Art, and other City owned facilities, property appraisal services, market studies, identification of appropriate uses, and building assessments and estimates.

Overland Pacific & Cutler has proven to provide the quick service and variety of services necessary to efficiently manage projects, property, and provide related resources.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
No outreach was necessary for this item.
17 of 446
3 b 4

FISCAL IMPACT
The not-to-exceed contract with Overland Pacific and Cutler is increasing by $300,000.

As this is a not-to-exceed contract, Purchase Orders will be utilized for services needed.

The cost for this year is $130,000, which was approved as a part of the FY 23-24 budget, and no additional funding is needed at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$80,000 43110-1010-CDD-2511-P0000 General Fund
$50,000 GL: 43110-2130-CDD-0020-P0000
PL: G65004
Low- and ModerateIncome Housing Funds

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subjected to CEQA/NEPA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit #1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the contract amendment with OPC to increase the maximum cost in the amount of $300,000 and extend the term by two years. This will allow staff to continue providing uninterrupted service to other departments’ acquisition needs as well as maintain the City’s obligations as a landlord with our tenants.

Alternative 2: Decline to authorize the contract amendment with OPC. This will result in the cessation of the ongoing property management and appraisal services needed in the future. Should any property management issues arise, or appraisal services be needed, staff would need to go through the process of hiring a qualified firm for services or utilize our own Facilities group.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Tamar Sadd, Deputy Director of Community Development
18 of 446
4 b 4
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Finance Disclosure Statement.
19 of 446
CC_07112023_Motion_4b1.pdf
MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded by
Council Member ______________, that the City Council hereby authorizes staff to amend the Professional Services Agreement with Overland Pacific & Cutler to increase the maximum cost by $300,000 for a new not-to-exceed amount of $616,778 over an additional two-year term.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
20 of 446
21 of 446
22 of 446
4c

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer (PP-GEMT-IGT) Program.

2. Resolution of Appropriation

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Since 1999 Medi-Cal has paid a base rate of $118.20 for patients transported by public agency emergency medical services (EMS) providers. The Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer (PP-GEMT-IGT) program that was established by the California Legislature and Governor Newsom (AB 1705) and managed by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) will provide an add-on payment of $946.92 to bring the total payment for ambulance transportation up to $1,065 for those patients covered by Medi-Cal. The program is estimated to bring in net new revenue of approximately $2.1 million to the General Fund.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Fiscal Responsibility
23 of 446
2 c 4

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Fire Department to participate in the Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer program that was established by Assembly Bill 1705; authorize the City Manager to execute grant documents; approve the City’s proportional amount of the non-federal matching funds; and approve the Resolution of Appropriation.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Department has participated in the GEMT-CPE and QAF (Senate Bill 523) programs for over 12 years. These programs augmented funding for the ambulance transportation services provided to Medi-Cal patients. As a public fire departmentbased emergency ambulance provider, patients are charged fees for services as authorized by the City Council and recommended by the County of Los Angeles. The fees for ambulance transportation change each year based on the County directive. An ALS transport fee for Glendale Fire Department is currently $2,550 base rate that does not include the cost of supplies, medications, and necessary services. The average ALS transportation bill is about $2,700.

GFD responded to more than 18,000 medical calls and transported approximately 12,000 medical emergency patients to the hospital in calendar year 2022. Those numbers typically increase by about 3 to 3.5% each year. Based on recent data, GFD is estimated to transport more than 6,000 patients covered by Medi-Cal or Medi-Medi in 2023 which reflects more than a 30% payor mix.

Patients can be covered by Medi-Cal if they meet the qualification requirements including an income/poverty test based on family size and income, are disabled, or have certain medical conditions, or are enrolled in CalFresh, SSI/SSP, or CalWorks. Unlike patients with private insurance or in most cases Medicare, Medi-Cal patients do not have a co-pay and medical providers, such as the GFD, must accept Medi-Cal payments as payment in full. The reimbursements to the Fire Department have historically been capped at $118.20 and reflects a significant loss in comparison to the base rates listed above. To help offset the revenue loss, in 2017, Senate Bill 523 established a GEMT-Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) program that provided an additional net $188 per Medi-Cal transport. While helpful, there is still a significant revenue shortfall. Assembly Bill 1705, which ended the QAF program as of December 31, 2022, was created to help agencies throughout California bridge this revenue loss for MediCal transports.

ANALYSIS
Starting in January 2023, ambulance bills for patients enrolled in Medi-Cal Fee-forService and Managed Care will be automatically paid a base rate of $118.20 plus the new add-on amount of $946.92. Bills for patients enrolled in both Medi-Cal Managed Care and Medicare (also known as dual enrollment or Medi-Medi) will be paid a base rate of $118.20, the Medicare rate of $415 plus a new add-on amount of $531.80 to reach the $1,065 compensation rate. Based on the number of Medi-Cal enrolled 24 of 446
3 c 4
patients that GFD expects to transport in calendar year 2023, this program will result in total new gross revenue of $4,581,759 from the new add-on payments.

Funding for the new PP-GEMT-IGT add-on payments for Medi-Cal patient ambulance transportation by public providers is made from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) federal funds matched with local funds. The mechanism of the legislation prohibits State of California general funds to be used, so the program requires that public ambulance providers voluntarily provide the State with the amount needed, which is approximately $110 million collectively, through an Inter-Governmental Transfer (IGT). California DHCS then uses the non-federal funds to draw down the available matching federal funds and use the combined amount to pay the add-on amount per transport. DHCS estimated that Glendale Fire’s proportional amount of the non-federal share will be $1,884,557 for calendar year 2023. In addition, DHCS charges an administrative fee of 10% which will be $188,455 for calendar year 2023.

In addition to Glendale’s non-federal share and administrative fee, Assembly Bill 1705 ended the GEMT-Certified Public Expense (GEMT-CPE) and Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) programs. As such, the revenue from these terminated programs is subtracted from the gross revenues to accurately calculate the net new revenue. Lastly, Glendale contracts with Wittman Enterprises to provide ambulance billing services and their fee is

3.75% of collected revenue. When accounting for the new revenues and costs, the PPGEMT-IGT program is expected to generate approximately $2.1 million in net new revenue as summarized in the table below.

PP-GEMT-IGT
Summary
Estimated Gross Revenue $4,581,759
Less:

Glendale’s Non-Federal Share $1,884,557
Administrative Fee 188,455
End of QAF & GEMT Revenue 202,455
Collection Fee 171,816
Total Cost (2,447,283)
Net Revenue $2,134,476
DHCS will normally invoice the City’s portion of the annual non-federal share plus DHCS’s 10% administration fees four times per year (quarterly). However, due to delays on the part of the state, in 2023 the annual IGT amount will be divided into thirds and the year’s DHCS admin fees will be added to the second and third invoices which are like to be due in September and December. The first PP-GEMT-IGT invoice was due on June 15 at which point the program’s health is being evaluated. The State is aware that Glendale is in process to participate pending City Council approval.

The IGT invoices to providers are based on maximum participation, meaning every public ambulance provider in the state. Every provider, Glendale included, is currently 25 of 446
4 c 4
being paid the add-on rates regardless of whether we are submitting our IGT. For every provider that does not contribute IGT funds, the invoices for participating agencies will increase proportionally, thus resulting in reduced net revenue. If too few agencies participate with IGT fund contributions, then the program would become insolvent and would revert to the traditional GEMT and QAF programs with much lower reimbursement fees. If the city chooses not to pay the IGT invoices to the State, our net revenue will be much higher, but we would cause all the participants to have higher invoices and we would contribute to the possibility that the program fails. As the analysis indicates, the Glendale Fire Department anticipates that when fully funded, this program will bring in significantly more revenue from Medi-Cal transports than the City has historically received.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
The expired SB523 and GEMT programs provided supplemental reimbursement in the amount of approximately $202,455 to the City in Calendar Year 2022 to augment the losses in revenue from the transport of Medi-Cal patients. The new PP-GEMT-IGT program is automatically providing add-on reimbursements to every public provider agency in California. In Glendale, this means that for the ambulance transportation of all Medi-Cal patients there will be a gross estimated $4,581,759 in new revenue, of which $2,447,283 is requested to be appropriated to pay for IGT invoices, applicable fees, and expenses related to supporting the program. After factoring in expenditures and the removal of the revenue of the old GEMT programs, our estimated final net new revenue for Calendar Year 2023 is $2,134,476.

The GEMT IGT was not included as part of the FY 2023-24 budget, therefore, staff is requesting for a Resolution of Appropriation from the General Fund. The appropriation request is outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $2,447,283 33511-1010-GFD-4001-
P0000-
44760-1010-GFD-4001-
P0000-
General Fund
$2,134,476 33511-1010-GFD-4001-
P0000-
25300-1010-000 General Fund
Funding for IGT invoices in future fiscal years will be appropriated during the annual budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subject to CEQA review. 26 of 446
5 c 4

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve as requested by the Fire Department Alternative 2: Not approve the Fire Department’s request Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Todd Tucker, Battalion Chief
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 - Department of Health Care Services Public Provider Intergovernmental Transfer Program for Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Services Certification Form
27 of 446
Cc_07112023_Motion_4c1.Pdf
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Fire Department is authorized to participate in the Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer Program; and that the City Manager is authorized to execute all documents necessary for the Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer Program.

The City Council also approves and authorizes the payment of the invoiced amount of the program’s non-federal share as outlined in the staff report.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
28 of 446
29 of 446
30 of 446

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES

PUBLIC PROVIDER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER PROGRAM FOR

GROUND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
CERTIFICATION FORM FOR STATE CALENDAR YEAR 2023
I, the undersigned, hereby declare and certify on behalf of ______________________ (the “Public Entity”) as follows:

1. As a public administrator, a public officer, or other public individual, I am duly authorized to make this certification.

2. The Public Entity elects to make this intergovernmental transfer (IGT) to the Department of Health Care Service (DHCS) as a voluntary contribution to the nonfederal share of Medi-Cal expenditures for purposes of Assembly Bill 1705 (2019) pursuant to Sections 14105.94, 14105.945, 14129, 14129.3, and 14164 of the Welfare and Institutions (W&I) Code. All funds transferred pursuant to this certification qualify for federal financial participation (FFP) pursuant to Section 1903(w) of the Social Security Act and Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 433 Subpart B, and are not derived from impermissible sources such as recycled Medicaid payments, federal money excluded from use as the non-federal share, impermissible health care-related taxes, or non-bona fide provider-related donations.

3. Voluntary contributions attributable to the period of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, will be made via recurring transfers as indicated on the invoices provided to the Public Entity by DHCS. The Public Entity acknowledges that any transfers made pursuant to this certification during this time period are considered an elective IGT made pursuant to W&I Code sections 14105.945 and 14164, to be used by DHCS, subject to paragraph four herein, exclusively as the source for the non-federal share of ground emergency medical transport public provider supplemental payments in both Medi-Cal fee-for-service payments and the portion of the risk-based capitation rate to Medi-Cal managed care health plans associated with reimbursement made in accordance with Section 14105.945, subdivision (h)(1) (hereafter, the AB 1705 Public Provider (PP) Ground Emergency Medical Transportation (GEMT) Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) Program, or the PP-GEMT IGT Program), and DHCS costs associated with administering the PPGEMT IGT Program.

4. DHCS may accept this voluntary contribution to the extent it is able to obtain FFP for the PP-GEMT IGT Program as permitted by federal law. In the event DHCS is unable to obtain FFP for the PP-GEMT IGT Program, or the full payments cannot otherwise be made to and retained by eligible public providers, and, therefore, all or a portion of the transferred amount cannot be used as the non-federal share of payments, DHCS will notify the Public Entity via e-mail and return the applicable portion of the unused IGT amount, no later than 90 days after such notification.

5. The Public Entity acknowledges that, in accordance with W&I Code section 14105.945, subdivision (h)(2), DHCS shall assess a ten percent (10%) fee on each 31 of 446

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES

PUBLIC PROVIDER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER PROGRAM FOR

GROUND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
CERTIFICATION FORM FOR STATE CALENDAR YEAR 2023
transfer of public funds to the state to pay for health care coverage and to reimburse DHCS its costs associated with administering the PP-GEMT IGT Program.

6. The Public Entity acknowledges that the IGT is to be used by DHCS for the filing of a claim with the federal government for federal funds and understands that any misrepresentation regarding the IGT may violate federal and state law.

7. The Public Entity acknowledges that all records of funds transferred are subject to review and audit upon DHCS’ request. The Public Entity will maintain documentation supporting the allowable funding source of the IGTs.

8. Upon notice from the federal government of a disallowance or deferral related to this IGT, the Public Entity responsible for this IGT shall be the entity responsible for the federal portion of that expenditure.

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further understand that the known filing of a false or fraudulent claim, or making false statements in support of a claim, may violate the Federal False Claims Act or other applicable statute and federal law and may be punishable thereunder.

Executed on this ______ day of _________, 20XX at __________________, California.

Signature of Authorized Person: __________________________________________ Name of Authorized Person: _____________________________________________ Title of Authorized Person: ______________________________________________ Name of Public Entity: _______________________________________________ NPI of Public Entity: _______________________________________________ Amount of IGT: $X.XX
32 of 446

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES

PUBLIC PROVIDER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER PROGRAM FOR

GROUND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
CERTIFICATION FORM FOR STATE CALENDAR YEAR 2023
# # #
33 of 446
4d

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program, Grant Funds in the amount of $389,966 to reduce and mitigate the impacts of impaired driving in local communities.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The intent of this report is to request to accept $389,966 in grant funds from the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program.
34 of 446
2 d 4

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the attached motion approving participation in the State of California – Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Law Enforcement Grant Program and accept grant funds in the amount of $389,966.

BACKGROUND
With the passage of Proposition 64 in 2016, The Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use Marijuana Act (AUMU), California voters mandated the state to set aside funding for the CHP to provide grants to local governments and qualified non-profit organizations for the education, prevention, and enforcement of impaired driving laws pursuant to Section 34019 (f)(3)(B) of the Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC).

ANALYSIS
In February 2023, staff submitted an application seeking grant funds to the State of California – Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Law Enforcement Grant Program. The CHP Program provides law enforcement agencies with funding to help reduce and mitigate the impacts of impaired driving in local communities. The intent of the program is to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve an agency’s effectiveness through training and development of new strategies.

The Glendale Police Department has been approved to use CHP’s Cannabis Tax Fund Law Enforcement Grant Program funds to continue to enhance its capabilities in identifying impaired drivers while operating motor vehicles. The grant funds will be used to help meet the Department’s goal of training 100% of patrol and traffic personnel in Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) and Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) programs, as well as continue to train internal and external personnel within the County of Los Angeles for Drug Recognition Expert (DRE), SFST, and ARIDE Recertification classes. The City of Glendale has a strong partnership with the CHP DRE Unit and will continue to host annual DRE schools and SFST / DRE instructor schools. The Department will also be able to host quarterly certification sites to train officers on how to identify drivers who may be impaired by alcohol and/or drugs while operating motor vehicles upon a roadway. Using best practice strategies, the Police Department strives to reduce the number of persons killed and/or injured by drivers under the influence of alcohol and drugs, and these grant funds will assist with these efforts.
35 of 446
3 d 4

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Participation in this program provides the Glendale Police Department the ability to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve its effectiveness through training and development of new strategies.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY2023-24 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program award in the amount of $389,966 was included as part of the FY2023-24 approved budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation:

Amount From (Account
String)
To (Accounting
String)
Funding Source
$389,966 GL: 32610-2610-
2610-GPD-0020-
P0000-T0000-F0000-
0000-0000-
PL: GPD01004AG
Police Fund – State
Grants
$374,751 GL: 41100-2610-GPD0020-P0000-T0000-
F0000-0000
PL: GPD01004AG
Police Fund - Labor
$8,815 GL: 44550-2610-GPD0020-P0000-T0000-
F0000-0000
PL: GPD01004AG
Police Fund – Travel
$6,400 GL: 43110-2610-GPD0020-P0000-T0000-
F0000-0000
PL: GPD01004AG
Police Fund –
Contractual Services

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subjected to CEQA/NEPA review. There is no possibility that the acceptance of this award may have a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3))

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements. 36 of 446
4 d 4

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve as requested by the Police Department.

Alternative 2: Deny the Police Department’s request. If the request is denied, the Police Department will not be able to utilize the grant funding for training, education, and enforcement of laws relating to impaired drivers and will have to utilize the general fund for those activities.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Scott Byrne, Police Sergeant
Alison Finch, Public Safety Business Administrator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
None.
37 of 446
cc_07112023_motion_4d1.pdf
MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded by
Council Member ______________, that the City Council hereby accepts grant funds from the State of California – Department of California Highway Patrol under the California Highway Patrol (CHP), Cannabis Tax Fund Law Enforcement Grant Program in the amount of $389,966 and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California – Department of California Highway Patrol for the award of funds.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
38 of 446
4e

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement for Independent Expert Review Services Related to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Permit Applications

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Telecom Law Firm (TLF) to provide Independent Expert Review Services Related to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTF) Permit Applications in the amount of $450,000 for a duration of three years from the date of the contract execution with an option to extend the contract for two additional one-year terms at $150,000 per year.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
WTF permit applications require a certain level of expert review that cannot be completed with current in-house staff expertise.

The intent of this item is to hire TLF for independent expert review services related to WTF permit applications in the amount of $450,000 for a term of three years, with an option to extend the contract for two additional one-year terms at $150,000 per year. 39 of 446
2 4e

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Not Applicable

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Telecom Law Firm for Independent Expert Review Services Related to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Permits Applications in the amount of $450,000 for a duration of three years from the date of the contract execution with an option to extend the contract for two additional one-year terms at $150,000 per year.

BACKGROUND
With the rapidly increasing demand for broadband and data services, the wireless communication industry and wireless service providers seek to deploy smaller cell (Small Cells) and distributed antenna systems (DAS). Many, if not all, of these facilities are placed in the public right of way. While the City of Glendale must adhere to federal and state laws and regulations when reviewing and considering wireless communications facilities applications, it does have its own stringent ordinance for WTF installations on private property, City-owned property (such as parks and City-owned facilities, which are not in the public right of way), and the public right of way. The City’s requirements for WTF installation permits on private properties and City-owned properties are contained in Title 30 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC), and the requirements to install WTF in the public right of way are contained in Chapter 12.38 of the GMC.

ANALYSIS
The City must process WTF permit applications within a set statutory time-line, set by both federal and state statutes. Below is a brief summary of the time-lines, commonly referred to as the “Shot Clock.”
47 USC Section 332c (The “Shot Clock”)
Under this federal Shot Clock rule, municipalities have 150 days to review applications for new WTFs, and 90 days for applications for collocations and other requests. The amended Section 322c clarifies that these Shot Clock rules also apply to DAS and Small Cells to the extent they are used to provide personal wireless services, regardless of whether the provider provides different services which are regulated differently. The Shot Clock commences upon the submission of the application and runs regardless of any local moratoriums.

For the currently very popular Small Cell attachments, FCC 2018 Order creates a newer, shorter shot clock and further cuts down the timeframe for those Small Cell attachments which are proposed to be collocated on existing structures (whether such structures have wireless facilities on them or not), as follows:
40 of 446
3 4e
• Small cells attached to an existing structure (i.e. a utility pole, tower, street light, traffic signal, building) - 60 days Shot Clock;
• Small Cells attached to a new/replacement structure – 90 days Shot Clock, and • WTFs (these are normally not Small Cells) which are free standing (i.e. towers, monopole, monopine) - 150 days Shot Clock.

The Shot Clock commences upon the submission of an application and the municipality has 10 days to notify the applicant, in writing, if the application is incomplete.

Municipalities and applicants may “toll” (pause) the Shot Clock by mutual agreement if needed.

California Government Code Section 65964.1:

This state statute imposes a “deemed-approved” remedy for a municipality’s failure to act on wireless permit applications for new sites and collocations. If the local agency fails to process an application for a new wireless site or a collocation, within 150 days and 90 days, respectively, the application shall be deemed approved. The Shot Clock can be paused if the wireless carrier submits an application and the local agency, within 30 days, provides a written explanation indicating why the application is incomplete.

The wireless carrier has the opportunity to re-submit the application, which then gives the local agency 10 days to determine if the re-submitted materials are complete. If a municipality does not act within the Shot Clock, the application is deemed approved. In the FCC 2018 Order, the FCC established two evidentiary presumptions against municipalities: first, the municipality is presumed to have failed to act within a reasonable time as required under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iii), and second the municipality’s failure to act is considered presumptive evidence that it intended to effectively prohibit wireless service facilities (whether Small Cell or WTF) under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II). Federal courts rely on these presumptions to grant injunctive relief and order municipalities to order the permits sought by the applicants.

Under the above-described Shot Clock, municipalities must act quickly in their review and processing of WTF permit applications. For these reasons, having a technical expert consultant, who is ready to assist City staff with complex reviews, will be beneficial to the City.

Glendale Municipal Code Provisions:

For both public right of way and private properties, the GMC sets forth extensive application requirements whereby an applicant for a WTF or Small Cell permit must provide the following information:
• Accurate mapping of the proposed site and all existing WTF locations and Small Cell sites owned by the applicant;
41 of 446
4 4e
• Certification demonstrating compliance with FCC’s RF safety standards; • Justification of proposed height;
• Analysis of alternative sites and configurations;
• Visual impact analysis with accurate photo simulations; • Projection of future needs within the City of Glendale; • Analysis of the significant gap in service the proposed WTF, or assessment of the accuracy of the coverage enhancement for Small Cells; • Demonstration that the proposed WTF or Small Cell has been designated to the minimum height and diameter;
• Maintenance and monitoring program for the proposed WTF or Small Cell, and • Demonstration of good faith efforts to co-locate the WTF or Small Cell, where possible.

In instances where the review of the technical aspects of an individual application requires expertise beyond what is available through City staff, the GMC Section

12.08.037(I) grants the City the discretion to hire an independent qualified technical expert consultant at the applicant’s expense, to evaluate technical and other aspects of a WTF permit application. The expert review can include, but is not limited to, assisting the City with the evaluation of the following:
• Alternative Site Analysis (including consideration of preferred locations), and • RF Emission Compliance Verification
TLF and Services to be Provided:

Dr. Jonathan L. Kramer, TLF’s founder and principal, is a nationally recognized radio frequency/broadband technology engineer, who also holds a Doctorate in Law and Policy degree. Dr. Kramer is a telecommunications expert, with over 35 years of experience in the field. Over the last 25 years, Dr. Kramer has served as a telecommunications expert for government agencies across the United States. Dr.

Kramer/TLF is retained by local governments as an advisor and expert. Dr. Kramer has assisted the City on numerous wireless technology matters, including the drafting of the City’s GMC provisions relating to WTF permitting requirements, and in 2020 with a permit reconsideration and appeal matter before the City Council.

Since 2020, TLF has assisted Public Works with the technical review of WTF permit applications in the public right of way. TLF’s services have been and will be utilized on an as-needed basis when a WTF permit application is received for review and consideration of:
• Completeness of application review;
• Design Analysis;
42 of 446
5 4e
• Alternative Sites analysis and evaluation of time, place, and manner considerations and comparison of proposed location for compliance with City requirements;
• Radio Frequency FCC Compliance Analysis, and
• Other analysis as necessary.

Staff has negotiated different alternatives based on the complexity level of the issues and required review with the option of review fees as follows:
• A la carte basis – for instances such as where the City requires expert review assistance with one or few issues;
• All-inclusive basis – for instances such as where the entire permit application should be reviewed by an independent expert, and
• Hourly Basis – for specific tasks, such as analysis of a specific issue or question at the request for the City.

The technical review charges incurred by TLF will be reimbursed to the City by the carrier applicants when they are in connection with WTF permit submittals.

The current PSA with TLF will expire in August 2023. TLF was selected pursuant to a Request for Proposals (RFP) process in 2020. On March 5, 2020, the City, through its City Attorney’s Office issued the RFP and invited qualified consulting firms to submit proposals for consideration to act as the City’s independent expert for the technical review of WTF permit applications, at the request of the City. Since then TLF has assisted Public Works with numerous technical reviews of WTF permit applications and related items and currently is assisting Public Works with numerous pending WTF permit applications with many more anticipated. For the foregoing reasons, and in order to maintain the continuity of services, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the herein-requested PSA going forward with TLF.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable

FISCAL IMPACT
The independent expert review services for WTF permit applications will cost $450,000 for the 3-year contract duration and potentially an additional $300,000 for the optional 2- year extension or $750,000 total. The funds for the first year of this service in the amount of $150,000 was approved as a part of the FY 2023-24 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. Funding for the remaining contract years will be requested as a part of the City’s annual budget process. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:
43 of 446
6 4e
Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$150,000 GL: 43110-1010-PWD-7536-P0000 General Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not Applicable; the action requested herein to retain consulting services is ministerial and does not constitute a project for the purposes of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager to enter into and execute a PSA with TLF as described in this report.

Alternative 2: Elect not to award the PSA as recommended herein. This would result in permit application delays and the approval of applications without expert and City review after state-imposed deadlines.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Dorine Martirosian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: TLF Campaign Disclosure Forms
44 of 446
7 4e
45 of 446

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Telecom Law Firm, to provide Independent Expert Review Services Related to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Permit Applications in the not to exceed amount of $450,000 for three years, with an option to extend the contract for two additional one-year terms at $150,000 per year, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
46 of 446
EXHIBIT 1
IV. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address
2708 Wilshire Blvd. #330
2708 Wilshire Blvd. #330
City
Santa Monica
State
CA
Zip
President, Chairman of BOD
Treasurer
Chief Operating Officer
Jonathan Kramer
Jonathan Kramer
Robert May III
90403
Santa Monica
San Diego
90403
92108
CA
3570 Camino del Rio North #102 CA
Jonathan Kramer, Robert May
Jonathan Kramer
Directors
More than 10% interest owner 2708 Wilshire Blvd. #330 Santa Monica CA 92108 * “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
47 of 446
Subcontractor(s)**:

Full Name
NONE
Name Address
Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by: Not applicable Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named X Contractor Subcontractor:
 I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and  I hereby certify that:
.
.
.

I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is 2 pages.

Executed on:

Signatu
9th day of June , 20 23 , at: Los Angeles
Print Full Name:
, California.

Dr. Jonathan L. Kramer
Addres nta Monica CA 90403
Phone Number: (310) 312-9900 ext 121 E-mail Address: [email protected] 48 of 446 8a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Contract for the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride Transit Services

1.) Resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the Beeline fixed-route agreement for a one-year period for a not to exceed the amount of $12,234,395 and to amend the Dial-A-Ride service operation and maintenance agreement with MV Transportation, Inc. for a one-year period for a not to exceed amount of $1,025,578, for a total amount of $13,259,973.

2.) Resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with MV Transportation, Inc. for the operation and maintenance of the City’s Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services in a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a six-year term, with two, two-year extension options; if the 1st option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $106,245,519 for a total eight-year term; and, if the 2nd option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $137,828,127 for a total ten-year term.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On June 13, 2023, Public Works staff presented to City Council a proposed contract with MV Transportation based on proposals to award a new operations and maintenance contract for a six-year term with additional renewal option years. City Council instead directed staff to negotiate an extension to the current Beeline and DialA-Ride (DAR) operations contracts for a one-year period and return for Council’s consideration and approval. The new negotiated one-year extension amount of $13,259,973 includes the contracted operations as well as pass-through expenses for major vehicle and equipment repairs, special equipment needs, fuel for the DAR vehicles, and minor service modifications as needed for each service. This newly negotiated one-year extension option represents an increase of $1,940,267 for both the Beeline fixed-route and the DAR service operation and maintenance proposal by MV Transportation.
49 of 446
2 a 8

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Mobility, Traffic, and Pedestrian Safety: Continued transit services will connect people and places in our community in a safe, reliable, environmentally friendly way

RECOMMENDATION
That City Councill provide direction to staff.

BACKGROUND
Glendale provides the Beeline fixed-route bus and Dial-A-Ride paratransit services for the community. These services are operated by a contractor. The current service contracts with MV Transportation, Inc. expired on June 30, 2023. The Beeline contract was last awarded in 2015 and the Dial-A-Ride contract in 2016, both through a competitive procurement process.

On March 2, 2023, the Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued for the operation and maintenance of fixed route and Dial-A-Ride transit services. The RFP was emailed to ten firms known to operate transit services and was posted on the City website under the “RFP/RFQ/BID Page.” On March 9 and March 11 two non-mandatory preproposal and facility/fleet inspection meetings were held, respectively. The virtual preproposal meeting was attended by six firms and the in-person facility and fleet inspection meeting by four firms. Three addendums were issued in response to questions, and the final submittal due date was extended for a total of an eight-week timeframe, which is greater than the average for similar tier 2 operators.

On April 26, 2023, the City received two proposals from Keolis Transportation and MV Transportation. The proposals are summarized within Exhibit 1.

ANALYSIS
At the June 13, 2023, City Council meeting, Councilmembers offered questions regarding the Beeline and DAR operations RFP, which staff has provided responses to below:

Evaluation Panel
The use of transit professionals who have experience in contracted services is the preferred method for small to medium municipal transit properties. The City of Glendale has used transit professional evaluation panels for at least 20 years. The cities of Pasadena, Santa Clarita, and Los Angeles all use transit professionals as proposal evaluators. Transit professionals review the proposals and attend the interviews with the intent to evaluate each proposal based on the City of Glendale's stated criteria. Transit professionals have transit service contracting experience with direct knowledge of 50 of 446
3 a 8
transit service operating expectations, operating costs, and electrification of a transit fleet. Per the City of Glendale’s City Attorney’s response, there is no conflict of interest with transit professionals on the evaluation panel.

RFP Preparation and Schedule
Staff began the Beeline and Dial-A-Ride operations RFP in January 2023. The RFP preparation was time consuming and took two months to complete before it was released on March 2, 2023.

Originally, staff had planned on placing this item before the City Councill on May 23, 2023, for consideration of award to allow sufficient time for the thirty-day startup if a new contractor, other than the incumbent, was selected. However, due to two separate extension requests by one of the firms, that ultimately did not submit a proposal, the overall schedule was delayed by nearly a month. Consequently, the earliest date which this item could have been considered by the City Council was at the June 13th meeting.

Despite efforts to accommodate the time extension request of a potential third company that ultimately did not submit a proposal, only two proposals were received by the revised April original 26th due date. During the submittal timeframe, the evaluation panel of transit professionals were selected and met to review the proposals and conduct the interviews. Both proposals successfully proceeded through the selection process, with the recommended firm, MV Transportation, Inc., providing the most responsive and responsible proposal at the lowest price.

RFP Outreach and Follow Up
Originally the RFP was sent to ten transit contractors and posted on the City of Glendale's RFP page. Six transit contractors attended the non-mandatory pre-proposal meeting, and four firms visited the Beeline Bus Maintenance facility and submitted questions. Ultimately, two firms submitted proposals.

Glendale Transit staff contacted the remaining two firms that had previously attended the pre-proposal conference, including the facility and vehicle site visit, and submitted questions but did not submit a proposal. A representative from Southland Transit, who had asked for the second extension but did not submit a proposal stated that they did not have enough time to complete the Federal Transit Administration’s Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) requirement. The RFP included a 3.6% DBE goal which requires proposers to identify DBE firms, and the associated costs, and show a good faith effort to reach the goal.

The DBE goal is a federal government requirement for all federal operating and capital transit contracts. Beeline and Dial-A-Ride services receive federal operating grants from 51 of 446
4 a 8
the federal government. Furthermore, 90% of the combined Beeline and Dial-A-Ride fleet was procured with federal grant funds. Lastly, the Beeline maintenance facility is also federally funded. Therefore, the operating contract must include federal procurement clauses, including the DBE requirements.

The RFP due date was extended, first for ten days and then an additional three weeks per request by one potential proposer, effectively doubling the submittal period. In doing so, potential bidders were afforded a total of eight weeks, which allowed more than sufficient time to respond to the DBE requirements including the good faith effort.

Most small to medium size agencies schedule a four-to-six-week submittal period, and most large agencies provide an eight-to-ten-week submittal period. For example, Pasadena Transit five weeks, Santa Clarita Transit seven weeks, LA Metro eight and half weeks, Foothill Transit ten weeks, and OCTA ten weeks. Additionally, Beeline's 2016 RFP had a four-week submittal period and the ability to meet DBE requirements was not a factor in that solicitation. Finally, at no time during the recent solicitation effort was it mentioned by any of the firms that the timeframe to meet DBE requirements was a limiting factor in their decision to pursue submittal of a proposal.

The fourth firm was Transportation Concepts that expressed initial interest but did not successfully execute a proposal. They cited the requirement to identify five Key Personnel as the reason for not submitting a proposal. They would only be able to identify a General Manager and at most, a Maintenance Manager. Identifying additional key personnel, such as an Assistant General Manager, whose primary responsibility would be managing the electrification of the Beeline fleet, Operations Manager, or a Safety and Training Manager, was difficult to staff, and therefore, would negatively impact their evaluation score. In response to this objection, an addendum to the RFP was made which reduced the Key Personnel requirement to three, with the other two to be filled after contract award; however, Transportation Concepts still did not submit a proposal.

Finally, two of the larger transit firms active in the Los Angeles area, TransDev and First Transit merged in early March 2023 and may have contributed to neither firm submitting a proposal.

It is not unusual to receive two proposals for these types of contracts, as exemplified by the recent OCTA, Foothill Transit, and Metro procurements. In each of these cases, there were ultimately no more than two qualified proposers, which were interviewed.

Upon speaking with other transit agencies in Los Angeles County, they noted the transit industry is experiencing a driver shortage but also a management staff shortage.

Without key personnel, companies such as Transportation Concepts would be unable to submit a proposal since transit agencies require these positions to be filled along with 52 of 446
5 a 8
their resumes, so evaluators can ensure the personnel is qualified. The lack of management staff is contributing to the number of firms responding.

Eliminating or reducing the key personnel requirement would not be advisable since the key personnel performs critical work to maintain service quality, safety, and maintenance of the buses, and aid in the transition to battery-electric buses.

Length of MV Contract Award
The length of the proposed 6-year contract in question is similar to the existing Beeline contract. The FY 2016 Beeline contract was also for six years with two, one-year renewal options. The current RFP contract term is for six years and two, two-year renewal options that allows the City to lock in the low contract price for multiple years.

The longer contract period allows for:
• Amortization of equipment over six years, lowering the annual cost. • Teamsters Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) expires June 2027 and locks the wages and benefits for the next four years.
• The initial six-year term includes each contract years increases including wages and CPI. The two, two-year options also include wage and CPI increases with an average of a 4% CPI increase.
• Successfully transitioning to battery-electric buses is a 10-year process and needs an experienced long-term operations partner.

MV Transportation’s proposed cost over the six-year term is $74.5 million with a firstyear cost of $11 million. The cost per revenue hour is used to compare cost amongst transit agencies. The table shows Glendale's favorable cost per revenue hour.

Contracted Fixed-Route Hourly Service Rates
Cost per
Revenue Hour Rate
Burbank (18 buses) (MV) $93.23
Pasadena (29 buses) (TransDev) $96.77
Glendale (44 buses) (MV) Glendale Proposed $100.52
AVTA (77 buses) (MV) $106.77
53 of 446
6 a 8
Metro South Region (70 buses) (MV) $128.26
Metro North Region (49 buses) (TransDev) $137.79
LADOT South (108 buses) (MV) $141.24
Metro East Region (37 buses) (Southland) $149.29
LADOT North (123 buses) (MV) $181.45
Foothill Transit recently awarded a contract to Keolis and noted a 42% increase in costs. Their hourly rate increased from $131.95 to $187.09. The increased cost of labor drove the contract’s higher price.
1-Year Extension of the Existing Contract with MV
The City Council directed staff to negotiate a one-year extension with MV Transportation, Inc. for the existing Beeline and Dial-A-Ride contracts and return to Council for its consideration. The one-year extension does not include new items included in the RFP such as an Assistant General Manager overseeing the electrification of the Beeline fleet, including ensuring the charging infrastructure and the battery-electric buses are operating, training drivers to optimize the range of the batteryelectric buses, and training mechanics.

The issues described previously, including driver shortage, qualified key personnel, and increasing labor costs, will continue to impact the transit industry for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, qualified transit operators evaluate each municipal opportunity, based on its merits and how successful they can be in winning the associated contract.

The current proposers may re-evaluate their business development strategies with the City, depending on the outcome of the current procurement. Furthermore, some of the more experienced drivers may be relocated to other, more long-term contracts.

The negotiated cost for a one-year extension to the Beeline’s contract is $12,234,395 and the cost to extend the Dial-A-Ride’s contract is $1,025,578, for a total cost of $13,259,973. Both contract extensions include pass-through costs. As compared to the original proposed six-year agreement, including pass-through costs, represents a $1.94 million increase for one year of operation and maintenance of the Beeline operation, representing a 17% increase. By way of example, $1.94 million is equal to the annual operating cost of two Beeline routes or the purchase of two battery-electric buses.

The table below shows the Best and Final Offer (BAFO) price MV Transportation provided, the contract extension cost, and the difference between the two. The equivalent one-year cost for both the Beeline fixed-route and the Dial-A-Ride service 54 of 446
7 a 8
operation and maintenance proposed six-year agreement would be $11,319,706, in Fiscal Year 23-24.

MV BAFO 6-Year
Contract
Award*
MV 1-Year
Contract
Extensions*
Difference
FY 2024 $11,319,706 $13,259,973 $1,940,267
FY 2025 $11,736,749
FY 2026 $12,463,212
FY 2027 $13,071,286
FY 2028 $13,731,792
FY 2029 $14,184,055
6-Year Base Term Total $76,506,800
*Pass through costs are included
The reason for the increase in rates over the existing contracts as negotiated with MV Transportation is summarized below:
• Wages- MV factored in for the necessary wages for the extension period in alignment with the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and the expected wages for nonbargained and salaried personnel. • Benefits- MV factored in for the necessary benefits for the extension period in alignment with the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and the expected benefits for non-bargained and salaried personnel.
• Depreciation- MV factored in for needed replacement of items given their end of useful life to ensure they can continue to provide a safe and reliable service to the city and its ridership. These items include the replacement of DriveCam and Mobileye units and associated hardware, five Road Supervisory vehicles, Shop trucks, Shop equipment, and other IT items. The recovery of these costs is contemplated over the first twelve months of the extension term pricing to align with the City’s request and mitigate MV’s risk of recovery should the term not extend beyond that time. • Contingency- Given the possibility of only a one-year extension and the uncertainty of a long-term award to MV, should a new procurement be initiated, MV expects it will 55 of 446
8 a 8
experience staff turnover. MV has factored in contingency costs necessary to bring needed personnel in to temporarily fill open positions from other MV locations and/or the need to find replacement staff during this period on a short-term basis, which will cost substantially more than in a long-term employment scenario. • Repairs- MV has factored in for needed repairs during the extension period for Cityowned equipment on the city-provided revenue fleet.

Transit Electrification
The RFP included the hiring of a new Assistant General Manager responsible for the electrification of the Beeline bus fleet. This new position will be responsible for ensuring the electrification infrastructure is installed and operating, and training drivers and mechanics on the operation and maintenance of the battery-electric buses. Many transit agencies have experienced setbacks in their transition and advise other transit agencies to have an experienced staff with bus electrification to avoid service disruptions and optimize the operating range.

The first five electric buses and charging infrastructure are scheduled to arrive in April 2024 and the one-year contract extension option will not have the benefit of the new Assistant General Manager to aid in operations and training. This could delay the introduction of these five buses into service and the corresponding GHG reductions afforded by transitioning to zero-emission buses.

Month-to-Month Extension
Since the contract expired at the end of June 2023, staff negotiated a one-month extension with MV Transportation, so that the final determination on the status of this contract can be made by Council, accordingly.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The contract award for the operation and maintenance of the Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services will provide continued transportation options for the public. Public Works reached out to industry businesses known to operate transit services. The department directly emailed the businesses as well as posted the RFP on the City’s website.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contract extension for the Beeline is $12,234,395 and the Dial-A-Ride contract extension is $1,025,578 for a total amount of $13,259,973. Funding is available in the FY 2023-24 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined in the table below. Future year costs will be budgeted as part of the annual budget process
Requested FY 2023-24 Appropriation
56 of 446
9 a 8
Amount Account String Funding Source
$13,259,973 GL: 43110-2580-PWD-7533 Transit Utility Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is exempt per Section 15061 (b) (3). The project is covered by the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposed action pertains to a contract that will allow the continuation of existing Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services. This amended contract will not result in any significant change in services or physical changes to the environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Adopt a resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager or his designee, to extend the Beeline and Dial-A-Ride contracts for oneyear with MV Transportation, Inc.

Alternative 2: Adopt a resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager to contract with MV Transportation, Inc. as recommended in Exhibit 1.

This will provide seamless continuation of Beeline bus and Dial-A-Ride paratransit services to our community.

Alternative 3: Elect not to award either contract. This may result in stoppage of valuable transit services to the public with adverse consequences for dependent riders who rely on the services as their means of transportation.

Alternative 4: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Martha D’Andrea, Transit Manager
57 of 446
10 a 8
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Staff Report and Attachments from June 13, 2023 Exhibit 2: Campaign Disclosure Form
58 of 446
1 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER OR A DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND AMEND TO EXTEND

FOR ONE-YEAR THE BEELINE FIXED ROUTE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

CONTRACT AND THE DIAL-A-RIDE DEMAND RESPONSE OPERATION AND

MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale has provided Beeline fixed-route bus service since 1984 and Dial-A-Ride paratransit service since 1988 for the community; WHEREAS, since their inception, both transit services have been operated by professional contractors whose expertise is required in providing high quality, efficient, reliable Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services to the public that meet federal, state and local regulations and safety laws;
WHEREAS, the contracts with the City’s current Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit operations and maintenance contractor, MV Transportation, Inc., expire on June 30, 2023;
WHEREAS, MV Transportation, Inc. has the experience, personnel, resources, and desire to operate and maintain the City’s transit services; WHEREAS, MV Transportation, Inc., has proven that as the incumbent contractor, operating the Beeline transit service for 22 years and the Dial-A-Ride paratransit service for 7 years, it possesses the ability to reliably and efficiently operate and maintain the City’s transit services;
WHEREAS, the City desires to extend the two contracts for one-year from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024,
WHEREAS, procurement of the transit services contractor does not readily lend itself to a formal competitive bidding process and a contract award to the lowest responsible bidder, as required by the City’s Charter and the Glendale Municipal Code, because of the distinctive nature of operating and maintaining public transit services— which requires consideration of additional important factors, such as service quality and technical expertise;
WHEREAS, the Council finds that sufficient budgetary funds exist to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute one-year contract amendments with MV Transportation, Inc., to operate and maintain the City’s transit services; 59 of 446
2 WHEREAS, Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Sec. 9 provides an exemption to competitive bidding when the Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and
WHEREAS, given the need to continue providing transit services to the public, it appears that adequate justification exists and it is in the City’s best interest to dispense with competitive bidding and to authorize the City Manager or a designee to negotiate and execute contract amendments to extend the transit services contracts for an additional year.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

1. The foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct, and are a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding, and authorizing the contract amendments to extend the transit services contracts by one-year.

2. The Council hereby:

A. Dispenses with competitive bidding;
B. Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to negotiate and amend the Beeline service operation and maintenance agreement with MV Transportation, Inc. to extend the contract for a one-year period from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, for a not to exceed amount of $12,234,395 and to amend the Dial-A-Ride service operation and maintenance contract with MV Transportation, Inc. for a one-year period from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, for a not to exceed amount of $1,205,578, for a total not to exceed amount of $13,259,973— subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Adopted this day of , 2023.

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
60 of 446
3 I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
61 of 446
1 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING; APPROVING A

CONTRACT AWARD THROUGH A COMPETITIVE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCUREMENT PROCESS; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR A DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A 6-YEAR AGREEMENT, WITH TWO, 2-YEAR RENEWAL OPTIONS WITH MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

TO PROVIDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF

BEELINE FIXED-ROUTE AND DIAL-A-RIDE TRANSIT SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale has provided Beeline fixed-route bus service since 1984 and Dial-A-Ride paratransit service since 1988 for the community; WHEREAS, since their inception, both transit services have been operated by professional contractors whose expertise is required in providing high quality, efficient, reliable Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services to the public that meet federal, state and local regulations and safety laws;
WHEREAS, the contracts with the City’s current Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit operations and maintenance contractor, MV Transportation, Inc., expire on June 30, 2023;
WHEREAS, procurement of the transit services contractor does not readily lend itself to a formal competitive bidding process and a contract award to the lowest responsible bidder, as required by the City’s Charter and the Glendale Municipal Code, because of the distinctive nature of operating and maintaining public transit services— which requires consideration of additional important factors, such as service quality and technical expertise;
WHEREAS, issuance of a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) procurement process is better suited for obtaining a qualified transit services contractor, as it allows for an evaluation of proposals based on important criteria that cannot be considered if the traditional competitive bidding/lowest responsible bidder procurement process were used;
WHEREAS, the City being a subrecipient of both federal and state grant funds, and to facilitate qualifying for any future potential federal or state funding, must comply with state and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) procurement and contracting requirements;
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2023, the Public Works Department issued an RFP, inviting proposals to operate and maintain the Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services; 62 of 446
2 WHEREAS, on April 26, 2023, two firms submitted proposals and after review and evaluation of the two proposals, MV Transportation, Inc., had the highest score and the lowest cost proposal;
WHEREAS, MV Transportation, Inc. has the experience, personnel, resources, and desire to operate and maintain the City’s transit services; WHEREAS, MV Transportation, Inc., has proven that as the incumbent contractor, operating the Beeline transit service for 22 years and the Dial-A-Ride paratransit service for 7 years, it possesses the ability to reliably and efficiently operate and maintain the City’s transit services;
WHEREAS, the Council finds that sufficient budgetary funds exist to authorize the City Manager to execute a 6-year agreement (initial term), with two 2-year renewal options with MV Transportation, Inc., to operate and maintain the City’s transit services; WHEREAS, Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Sec. 9 provides an exemption to competitive bidding when the Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and
WHEREAS, given the need to continue providing transit services to the public, it appears that adequate justification exists and it is in the City’s best interest― upon recommendation of the Director of Public Works― to dispense with competitive bidding and the requirement that the Council award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder, and to authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute a six-year contract, with two 2-year renewal options, with MV Transportation Inc. to operate and maintain the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

1. The foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct, and are a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding, approving a contract award through a competitive request for proposal procurement process and authorizing the execution of an agreement with the highest scoring RFP proposer.

2. The Council hereby:

A. Dispenses with competitive bidding;
B. Accepts and approves the proposal submitted by MV Transportation, Inc. in response to the Request for Proposals issued by the Public Works Department— to operate and maintain the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services; and
C. Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a 6-year agreement, from December July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2029 63 of 446
3 (initial term)— subject to approval by the City Attorney— with MV Transportation, Inc. to provide the services in a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a 6-year term, with two 2-year renewal options; if the 1st renewal option is exercised, the amount will not exceed $106,245,519 for a total 8-year term; and, if the 2nd renewal option is exercised, the amount will not exceed $137,828,127 for a total 10- year term.

Adopted this day of , 2023.

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
64 of 446

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award of Contract for the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride Transit Services Contract
(1) Resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with MV Transportation, Inc. for the operation and maintenance of the City’s Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services in a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a six-year term, with two, two-year extension options; if the 1st option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $106,245,519 for a total eight-year term; and, if the 2nd option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $137,828,127 for a total ten-year term.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 13, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Glendale’s Beeline fixed-route bus and Dial-A-Ride paratransit services offer public transportation options to the community. The services are operated by a contractor.

Public Works Transit staff requested proposals to award a new operations and maintenance contract for a six-year term with additional option years. The proposed contract with MV Transportation, Inc. (MV) will be for a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for the initial six-year term. The amount includes the contracted operations as well as pass through expenses for major vehicle and equipment repairs, special equipment needs, fuel for the DAR vehicles, and minor service modifications as needed. 8b
65 of 446

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Environmental Stewardship: Continued transit services will provide shared rides with cleaner fueled vehicles (CNG and future zero-emission battery-electric) to decrease carbon footprints and improve air quality in our community.

Housing: Continued transit operations will offer senior and low-income tenants in existing and future housing developments transportation options to work, school and businesses.

Mobility/Connectivity/Safety: Continued transit services will connect people and places in our community in a safe, reliable, environmentally friendly way.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution dispensing with competitive bidding to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with MV Transportation, Inc. for the operation and maintenance of the City’s transit services in a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a six-year term, with two,two-year extension options; if the 1st option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $106,245,519 for a total eight-year period; and, if the 2nd option to extend is exercised, the amount will not exceed $137,828,127 for a total ten-year term.

BACKGROUND
Glendale provides the Beeline fixed-route bus and Dial-A-Ride paratransit services for the community. The services are operated by a contractor. The current service contracts with MV Transportation, Inc. will expire on June 30, 2023. The Beeline contract was last awarded in 2015 and the Dial-A-Ride contract in 2016, both through a competitive procurement process.

At that time, the City did not have a transit facility, so the contractors were required to provide the operations yards. In late 2020, service operations were moved to the newly built, City owned, Beeline Transit Facility. Fortunately, both contracts were with the same service operator which facilitated a smooth transition to the new facility. Having two different contractors operating at one facility would have been extremely challenging and may have proven to adversely alter the nature and quality of the two service operations and vehicle maintenance.

The nature and space design of the transit facility, the City’s plans to move to a batteryelectric,zero-emission fleet, and the benefit of recognizing economies of scale with shared staff and resources for the two services, necessitated consolidating the two operations into a single contract.

The Request for Proposals (RFP) included a new Assistant General Manager position to aid in the transition from CNG to battery-electric buses. The transition to a zero2 8b 66 of 446
emission fleet requires a contractor who has experience with battery-electric buses and can address the challenges of operating and maintaining the new fleet.

On March 2, 2023, the RFP was issued for the operation and maintenance of fixed route and Dial-A-Ride transit services. The RFP was emailed to ten firms known to operate transit services and was posted on the City website under the “RFP/RFQ/BID Page.” Nonmandatory preproposal and facility/fleet inspection meetings were held on March 9 and March 11, respectively. The virtual preproposal meeting was attended by six firms and the in-person facility and fleet inspection meeting by four firms. Three addendums were issued in response to questions and to extend the proposal due date.

On April 26, 2023, the City received two proposals from Keolis Transportation and MV Transportation. Keolis Transportation is a national/international transit company that operates 23,000 vehicles providing more than 3 billion passenger trips worldwide. Keolis currently has operating contracts with Victor Valley Transportation Authority (116 vehicles), Foothill Transit (148 vehicles including 14 battery-electric buses), and the recently awarded Orange County Transportation Authority (209 vehicles). MV Transportation is a national transit company that operates in 26 states. MV Transportation has operating contracts with Antelope Valley Transit Authority (all battery-electric fleet), the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (365 vehicles including 29 battery-electric buses), and Santa Clarita Transit (120 vehicles). The proposals are summarized in the table in the Analysis section.

ANALYSIS
Selection
The proposals from Keolis and MV Transportation, Inc., the incumbent contractor, were reviewed and scored by Glendale’s Transit Manager and three other transit professionals representing Antelope Valley Transit Authority (AVTA), City of Redondo Beach/Beach Cities Transit, and Foothill Transit. Collectively, they provided extensive expertise on contracted transit services as well as zero-emission bus deployment and operations.

The selection committee interviewed the proposer teams on May 9, 2023 and reviewed and scored the proposals based on the RFP evaluation criteria. The individual scores were averaged to provide the final ranking.
3 8b
67 of 446
The RFP evaluation criteria and scoring results are shown in the following chart:

Evaluation Scoring Summary
Possible
Points Evaluation Criteria Keolis

4.75 MV
Part I. Background, Affirmations, Certifications, and Financial Sustainability 5 5.00 Part II. Qualifications and Technical Proposal
Technical Capacity - Operations
Technical Capacity - Vehicle Maintenance
Technical Capacity - Facilities and Equipment
Technical Capacity - Administration
15 10
5 10
10 15

8.25 6.50

4.50 6.50

6.75 11.75

14.75 9.00

4.50 8.50

9.25 13.00
Safety Program & Employee Training
Experience, References, and Performance Record
Part III. Price Proposal, Incentives, and Staffing Plan Price Proposal
Staffing Plan
20 10
10 9.25

5.50 6.25

18.75 10.00
Bidding Preference for Retention of Employees 6.25
Totals 110 70.00 99.00
MV Transportation, Inc., was the proposer with the highest score of 99 and the lowest cost proposal.
4 8b
68 of 446
MV Transportation
As the incumbent contractor, MV Transportation has been an excellent partner in providing transit services to our community. As the successful contractor in multiple competitive City awards, MV has operated the Beeline bus service for 22 years. They have now operated the DAR service for 7 years. Their local team and employees have been and are committed to serving the Glendale public. Their regional and corporate team have been accessible and responsive to City needs. During economic downturns, MV has provided cost discounts at the City’s request. During the pandemic, they initiated additional safety and cleaning measures and kept their Glendale workforce intact. Of significant note, Glendale is one of the only agencies, especially in our region, that had a full workforce, including drivers which are at an industry-wide shortage, operating services without cancellations and disruptions, making it possible for essential workers and transit dependent riders to be able to get around.

With over 45 years experience, MV Transportation is the largest privately owned transportation provider in North America. MV offers paratransit, fixed route, school bus, commuter and shuttle services, fleet and facility maintenance, transit management technologies, labor management, and service model design. It operates more than 190 transit contracts in the United States and Canada. A few of MV’s local clients include LA Metro, Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), AVTA, and Cities of Santa Clarita and Burbank.

Some highlights of MV Transportation’s proposal are:
▪ Enhanced Technology – MV is adopting the HoloLens2 extended reality maintenance system in Glendale. The technology allows maintenance technicians to virtually tap into remote assist and built-in guides to troubleshoot fleet issues. It is also deploying newer paratransit dispatching and reservations software including a passenger portal web application to confirm, cancel or book trips.
▪ Experienced Local Management Team – The current MV management staff will remain assigned to the Glendale contract, providing service continuity and extensive Beeline and Dial-A-Ride operations knowledge. The new assistant general manager will bring experience with zero-emission service deployments. ▪ Strong Employee Relations – MV’s local management team has worked closely with Teamsters Local 848. A new labor agreement was negotiated in November 2022 for nearly a 5-year term until June 30, 2027. In addition, low employee turnover of less than 6% over last year as well as the number of longtime Beeline and Dial-A-Ride employees confirms their commitment to retaining local workers. They offer competitive wages, benefits and a positive labor environment. 5 8b
69 of 446
▪ Excellent Maintenance Program – MV has passed the California Highway Patrol terminal inspection each year of the current agreements (8 years total). They have proposed enhancements to their maintenance program and had already begun training the local maintenance staff in anticipation of Glendale’s move to batteryelectric vehicles. ▪ Superior Safety and Training Programs – MV’s training program provides ongoing annual skill enhancement training for the bus operators, above and beyond what is required and training programs for all employees. MV’s safety program is very strong resulting in zero reportable Beeline and Dial-A-Ride incidents in the last six years. In addition, MV provides incentive pay to mechanics that complete Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) certifications and offers multi-lingual technicians English as a Second Language (ESL) training assistance to attain those certifications.

Cost Proposal
The RFP cost proposals are listed below. Also noted below is MV Transportation’s best and final offer (BAFO).

Keolis
$430,762

MV MV BAFO
Start Up Cost (Not Included in Totals)
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2026
FY 2027
FY 2028
$13,304,418
$13,907,848
$14,434,796
$15,122,260
$15,716,350
$16,383,465
$88,869,136
$11,249,064
$11,628,327
$12,327,955
$12,931,957
$13,581,663
$14,027,256
$75,746,222
$11,022,109
$11,428,188
$12,135,552
$12,727,639
$13,370,781
$13,811,154
$74,495,424
FY 2029
6-Year Base Term Total
FY 2030
FY 2031
$16,512,877
$17,114,151
$33,627,028
$14,458,253
$14,909,209
$29,367,462
$14,255,432
$14,701,451
1st Option Term Total $28,956,883
8-Year Total $122,496,164 $105,113,684 $103,452,307
FY 2032
FY 2033
$17,556,005
$18,186,545
$35,742,550
$15,371,659
$15,850,772
$31,222,431
$15,139,452
$15,612,844
2nd Option Term Total $30,752,296
10-Year Total $158,238,713 $136,336,115 $134,204,602
In addition to the RFP proposed operating cost, there are several one-time and ongoing pass-through expenses. These cost items are traditionally excluded from the RFP process to avoid having Proposers cloud their proposals with expenses outside of their control. The additional contract activities and related costs include special vehicle 6 8b
70 of 446
equipment needs, vehicle major component repairs/replacement, DAR vehicle fuel, and minor service adjustments. An additional 2.7% is added for these items as noted in the tables below.

Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 6-Year Total Annual Proposal Cost $11,022,109 $11,428,188 $12,135,552 $12,727,639 $13,370,781 $13,811,154 $74,495,424 Additional Pass-Through Costs (2.7%) $297,597 $308,561 $327,660 $343,646 $361,011 $372,901 $2,011,376 TOTAL $11,319,706 $11,736,749 $12,463,212 $13,071,286 $13,731,792 $14,184,055 $76,506,800 1st Option
Yr 8
FY 2031
2nd Option
Yr 10
FY 2033
Yr 7
FY 2030
1st Option
Total
Yr 9
FY 2032
2nd Option
Total
10-Year
8-Year Total Total
Annual Proposal Cost $14,255,432 $14,701,451 $28,956,883 $103,452,307 $384,897 $396,939 $781,836 $2,793,212
TOTAL $14,640,329 $15,098,390 $29,738,719 $106,245,519
$15,139,452 $15,612,844 $30,752,296 $134,204,602
$408,765 $421,547 $830,312 $3,623,524
$15,548,217 $16,034,391 $31,582,608 $137,828,127
Additional Pass-Through Costs (2.7%)
RFP/PSA Dashboard
Project Description Contract to operate the Beeline fixed route and Dial-ARide transit services and to maintain their fleet vehicles.

RFP Approved NA
Advertisement Method City website, direct email to industry firms know to operate transit services
RFP Issued March 2, 2023
RFP Due Date April 26, 2023
Company Name(s) and
Proposal Amount(s)
Keolis – $88,869,136 (6-year term)
Keolis Startup Cost - $430,762 (one-time cost in 1st
year)
MV Transportation, Inc. - $75,746,222 (6-year term)
MV Transportation, Inc. BAFO - $74,495,424 (6-year
term)
Selection Criteria Background, Affirmations, Certifications and Financial Sustainability; Qualifications and Technical Proposal
(Operations, Vehicle Maintenance, Facilities &
7 8b
71 of 446
Equipment, Administration, Safety and Training
Program, Experience, References, Performance
Record); Price Proposal & Staffing Plan
Recommended
Consultant(s):

MV Transportation, Inc.

New / Existing Consultant(s) Existing
Procurement Method
Contract Term
RFP
Initial 6-year term with 2, 2-year options (possible max 10-year term)
Project Begins
Project Ends
July 1, 2023
June 30, 2029
1 st option if exercised June 30, 2031
2 nd option if exercised June 30, 2033

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The contract award for the operation and maintenance of the Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services will provide continued transportation options for the public. Public Works reached out to industry businesses know to operate transit services. The department directly emailed the businesses as well as posted the RFP on the City’s website.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contract with MV Transportation, Inc. will cost a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a six-year term. The cost for Year 1 in the amount of $11,319,706 was requested as part of the FY 2023-24 budget. Staff had anticipated a 20% upsurge due mostly to increased labor costs, however, the contract cost will be well below the budgeted amount.

No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council requested funding is outlined in the table below. Future year costs will be budgeted as part of the annual budget process.

Proposed FY 2023-24 Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$13,900,000 43110-2580-PWD-7533-P0000 Transit Utility Fund 8 8b
72 of 446

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Adopt a resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager to contract with MV Transportation, Inc. as recommended herein. This will provide seamless continuation of Beeline bus and Dial-A-Ride paratransit services to our community.

Alternative 2: Elect not to award the contract as recommended herein. This may result in stoppage of valuable transit services to the public with adverse consequences for dependent riders who rely on the services as their means of transportation.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Martha D’Andrea, Transit Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Disclosure Form
9 8b
73 of 446
74 of 446
75 of 446
76 of 446
77 of 446
78 of 446
79 of 446
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING; APPROVING A

TO PROVIDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF

BEELINE FIXED-ROUTE AND DIAL-A-RIDE TRANSIT SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale has provided Beeline fixed-route bus service since 1984 and Dial-A-Ride paratransit service since 1988 for the community; WHEREAS, since their inception, both transit services have been operated by professional contractors whose expertise is required in providing high quality, efficient, reliable Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services to the public that meet federal, state and local regulations and safety laws;
WHEREAS, the contracts with the City’s current Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit operations and maintenance contractor, MV Transportation, Inc., expire on June 30, 2023;
WHEREAS, procurement of the transit services contractor does not readily lend itself to a formal competitive bidding process and a contract award to the lowest responsible bidder, as required by the City’s Charter and the Glendale Municipal Code, because of the distinctive nature of operating and maintaining public transit services— which requires consideration of additional important factors, such as service quality and technical expertise;
WHEREAS, issuance of a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) procurement process is better suited for obtaining a qualified transit services contractor, as it allows for an evaluation of proposals based on important criteria that cannot be considered if the traditional competitive bidding/lowest responsible bidder procurement process were used;
WHEREAS, the City being a subrecipient of both federal and state grant funds, and to facilitate qualifying for any future potential federal or state funding, must comply with state and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) procurement and contracting requirements;
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2023, the Public Works Department issued an RFP, inviting proposals to operate and maintain the Beeline and Dial-A-Ride transit services; 1 80 of 446
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2023, two firms submitted proposals and after review and evaluation of the two proposals, MV Transportation, Inc., had the highest score and the lowest cost proposal;
WHEREAS, MV Transportation, Inc. has the experience, personnel, resources, and desire to operate and maintain the City’s transit services; WHEREAS, MV Transportation, Inc., has proven that as the incumbent contractor, operating the Beeline transit service for 22 years and the Dial-A-Ride paratransit service for 7 years, it possesses the ability to reliably and efficiently operate and maintain the City’s transit services;
WHEREAS, the Council finds that sufficient budgetary funds exist to authorize the City Manager to execute a 6-year agreement (initial term), with two 2-year renewal options with MV Transportation, Inc., to operate and maintain the City’s transit services; WHEREAS, Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Sec. 9 provides an exemption to competitive bidding when the Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and
WHEREAS, given the need to continue providing transit services to the public, it appears that adequate justification exists and it is in the City’s best interest― upon recommendation of the Director of Public Works― to dispense with competitive bidding and the requirement that the Council award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder, and to authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute a six-year contract, with two 2-year renewal options, with MV Transportation Inc. to operate and maintain the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

2. The Council hereby:

Dispenses with competitive bidding;
Accepts and approves the proposal submitted by MV Transportation, Inc. in response to the Request for Proposals issued by the Public Works Department— to operate and maintain the Beeline fixed-route and Dial-A-Ride transit services; and
C. Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a 6-year agreement, from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2029 (initial 2 81 of 446
term)— subject to approval by the City Attorney— with MV Transportation, Inc. to provide the services in a not to exceed amount of $76,506,800 for a 6-year term, with two 2-year renewal options; if the 1st renewal option is exercised, the amount will not exceed $106,245,519 for a total 8-year term; and, if the 2nd renewal option is exercised, the amount will not exceed $137,828,127 for a total 10- year term.

Adopted this
ATTEST:
day of , 2023.

Mayor
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
3 82 of 446
83 of 446
84 of 446
85 of 446
86 of 446
87 of 446
88 of 446
8b

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Initial Review of Proposed Subject Matter of Charter Amendments Pertaining to a Directly Elected Mayor, Council Districts, Councilmember Compensation, Contract Procurement and Miscellaneous Changes to the City Charter

1. Motion Directing Staff to Commence Drafting Charter Amendments

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Report provides a summary of charter provisions of California cities pertaining to the role, duties, term, and term limits for a directly elected mayor. The report also provides a summary of charter provisions of California cities regarding salary and compensation of council members and mayor.
89 of 446
2 b 8

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Improve Operations and Efficiency of City Government: Amendments to the City Charter improve operations and efficiency of government by setting forth the governing principles of the City’s operations. Amending the Charter to establish City Council districts may improve operations and efficiencies by improving constituent services as councilmembers will have more day-to-day interaction with the residents and issues affecting particular neighborhoods. Other proposed amendments to the Charter may improve operations and efficiencies such as by amending the charter provisions pertaining to contract procurement process.

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council review the options presented regarding proposed Charter amendments pertaining to a directly elected mayor, council districts, council compensation, and contracting and provide direction to staff to commence drafting amendments to the City Charter for Council consideration

BACKGROUND
On May 2, 2023, the Council adopted a resolution declaring its intent to transition to City Council districts, with a directly elected mayor, for consideration by the City’s voters at the March 2024 election. The direction provided was to pursue and study a plan of six Council districts and a directly elected mayor. The Council directed staff to provide information regarding the role and duties of a directly elected mayor, including participation and voting in Council meetings, along with the term and term limits for the mayor position. The Council also directed staff to provide information regarding salary/compensation for councilmembers. This Report provides information on these issues. As it stated during the May 2, 2023 meeting, staff is also presenting a brief synopsis on amending the charter to provide additional flexibility in the City’s contracting procedures.

ANALYSIS
Directly Elected Mayor
Role and Duties
The City Attorney’s Office surveyed 36 charter cities in California with directly elected mayors. Five of those cities’ charters were silent on the mayoral duties, leaving it to either state law or municipal code provisions to set forth the mayoral duties. The provisions regarding the role and duties of the remaining cities are set forth in Exhibit 1. In summary, the charters of the surveyed cities assign some or all of the following duties and role to directly elected mayors:
• The mayor is recognized as the official head of the City for all political, representative and ceremonial purposes and by the Governor for military purposes.
• The Mayor is charged with the performance of all duties lawfully delegated to it by the Charter, the council, or other laws.
90 of 446
3 b 8
• The mayor has the primary, but not the exclusive, responsibility for communicating the policies, programs and needs of the City government to the people, and as occasion requires, he or she may inform the people of any major change in policy or program.
• The mayor signs all legal instruments and documents to which the City is a party except where otherwise provided or by applicable law, ordinance, or resolution, minute action, or order of the Council, unless delegated to others such as the City Manager.
• The mayor is authorized to take command of the police, maintain order, and enforce the law during a time of extreme public danger or emergency, with the consent of the council, and for such period as the council may fix, with the advice and support of the city manager and city attorney.
• The mayor represents the city in all regional public agencies which require an elected city official, unless otherwise determined by the city council. • Some charters authorize the mayor to make policy, program and budget recommendations to the council.
• Some charters expressly authorize the mayor to coordinate the agenda with the city manager and staff.
• Some charters authorize the mayor to appoint and remove members of the boards and commissions, subject to approval of the Council
• Some charters give the mayor the primary but not the exclusive responsibility for interpreting the policies, programs and needs of the City government to the people, • Some charters authorize the mayor to inform the people of any change in policy or program.

Staff seeks Council direction on what duties and roles it would like to include in a proposed charter amendment to establish the position of directly elected mayor. In addition, staff believes it is appropriate for these charter provisions to clarify that the directly elected mayor position will not be a “strong-mayor” position and that the executive and administrative duties will remain with the City Manager.

Participation at Council Meetings and Voting/Veto Authority If the Council puts forth a charter amendment to create a directly elected mayor position, it should clearly identify the Mayor’s role at Council meetings and vis-à-vis the Council.

Most cities surveyed provide that the mayor is the presiding member, e.g. chair, at the council meetings, may participate in council discussions during council meetings and may make motions and may second motions. Most charters provide that the mayor is a voting member of the city council, although other options include providing that the mayor votes only in the event of a tie (Riverside) or that the mayor does not vote but has veto power over specified matters (Long Beach, Riverside and San Bernadino). It appears the prior discussion has centered on a directly elected mayor being a voting member of Council and staff seeks confirmation on that point.
91 of 446
4 b 8
Term
If a charter amendment for directly elected mayor is proposed, it should define the term for which the elected mayor serves. All charters surveyed make the term of the mayor either two years or four years.

Term Limits
The Council can propose a term limit of its choosing. Glendale’s councilmembers serve a maximum of three terms, from terms commencing in 2017. Surveyed charters vary in number of terms from two to four (when the terms are only two years) for the mayor.

Council Districts
In addition to giving staff direction regarding providing information on a proposed charter amendment for a directly elected mayor, the Council has also initiated the process to transition to Council districts by way of a charter amendment. The direction given to date is to pursue a six-district plan along with the directly elected mayor. As noted in the Report of the same date regarding the district transition process, there has not been unanimity on the issue of the directly elected mayor and staff seeks confirmation that Council desires to propose a directly elected mayor with six council members serving in districts, or alternative plans such as a seven-member district plan.

Adjustments to Make Charter Internally Consistent with Provisions Creating a Larger City Council.

There are several provisions of the Charter which are based on the assumption of a fivemember Council. If the Council is enlarged to seven members, these provisions should be modified.
• Article VI, Section 3 provides that a quorum of Council is three members. This will have to be modified to four members with a seven-member voting Council • The granting of a franchise, adoption of an ordinance, adoption of a budget or budget appropriation and payment of money ordered require three votes. This will require a similar change.
• The sale of real estate and the adoption of ordinances which change the zoning or development standards of real property require a 4/5ths vote of the Council. A 4/5ths vote of a seven-member Council will be six votes. The purpose of these provisions is to require a super-majority vote to undertake these important actions.

The Council should consider whether it wants to require six Council votes to take these actions. The Council could maintain a super-majority with five of seven votes. Alternatively, it could leave the requirement for 4/5ths vote, which would require six votes. The Council may want to clarify, either way, whether five or six affirmative votes will be required to approve these matters. 92 of 446
5 b 8
Council compensation
The City Council directed staff to prepare a review of council compensation models and methods provided by other charter cities. As a charter city, Glendale has plenary – or absolute - authority to establish in its charter the manner and method by which its elected and appointed officers are compensated, notwithstanding conflicting state law. (Article XI, section 5, subdivision (b)). Nevertheless, Article IV, Section 3 of the Charter, as amended in 2005, incorporates state law provisions for salaries of councilmembers in general law cities:
“Compensation for council members is hereby set, and from time to time shall be changed, in accordance with the schedule and procedure for adjustment applicable to the City of Glendale set forth in the provisions of the Government Code relating to salaries of council members in general law cities. The compensation of council members may also be increased during the terms of their respective offices by vote of the electors.”
The ”schedule” and “procedure for adjustment” set forth in the Government Code is a reference to Government Code Section 36516, subdivisions (a) and (b), and Section 36516.5. Section 36516(a) establishes the salaries for general law cities at $800 per month for cities over 150,000 and up to 250,000 in population. The “procedure for adjustment” set forth in Government Code Section permits cities to adjust council salaries by up to 5 percent per calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment. Under Government Code Section 36516.5, “a change in compensation does not apply to a council member during the council member’s term. This prohibition shall not prevent the adjustment of all members of a council serving staggered terms whenever one or more members of the city council becomes eligible for a salary increase by virtue of the councilmember beginning a new term.” In other words, an amendment to council salary does not take effect until at least one councilmember commences a new term. However, an adjustment approved by the voters can take effect upon certification of the election.

Utilizing the procedure for adjustment in the Charter and Section 36516(b), the Council has twice amended the Council salary since 2005, which amendments took effect in 2007 and 2013, respectively. The current councilmember salary is $1,430 per month. Since the Council has not adjusted council salaries since 2013, the Council could make an adjustment utilizing the above procedure to adjust the Council salaries effective April 2024 up to 55% (5 percent times 11 years) to $2,216.50 per month.

Alternatively, the Council could place a charter amendment on the ballot to adjust Council salaries or establish a different method to adjust Council salaries. In 2015, the Council placed a charter amendment on the ballot (Measure C) that would have permitted the Council to adjust salaries by Council Ordinance. Measure C failed by a significant margin,

76.6% No to 23.4% Yes. One primary reason it likely failed is because it was believed the Charter amendment would leave the Council unfettered discretion to set its own salaries.
93 of 446
6 b 8
Other charter cities have set forth in their charters the procedures for the method and manner of establishing and adjusting Council salaries in a number of ways:
• Some city charters established a base compensation for the directly elected mayor and councilmembers, subject to adjustments that may either be regular in nature or at the Council’s discretion, but subject to a percentage cap or CPI. • Some city charters index salaries of the mayor and councilmembers to area median income or a wage index. For example, the City of Santa Barbara sets the councilmembers’ salary at 80% of area median income (AMI) in Santa Barbara County, and the Mayor’s salary at 100% of the AMI. AMI, based on household size, in Los Angeles County is currently as set forth below:
1-Person 2-Person 3-Person 4-Person
$68,750 $78,550 $88,400 $98,200
• At least one city charter indexes salaries to other positions. Chula Vista’s Mayor’s salary is 66% of that of Superior Court judges in the State, while the councilmembers’ salaries are set at 40% of the Mayor’s salary. The current salary of Chula Vista’s Mayor is $152,575.02 while the Council’s salary is set at $61,030.06.
• Some city charters establish or authorize the establishment of a council compensation committee to either establish council salaries and compensation. In one case (Pasadena), the commission was a one-time appointment and subsequent increases were permissible subject to a cap, while others have salary setting commissions that periodically review salaries (Sacramento). • Some city charters utilize the approach that Measure C would have taken by authorizing their Councils to establish salaries by ordinance. • Some charters – like Glendale’s – expressly incorporate state law. • Some charters are silent. In some cases, those cities have followed state law; others they have set salaries by Council ordinance.

Exhibit 2 to this Report provides an overview of the cities surveyed, including council and mayoral salaries, as well as a summary of the criteria set forth in their charters.

Staff seeks Council direction on a potential amendment to the City Charter regarding the manner and method of setting and adjusting council salaries.

Contract Procurement
The City Charter requires the Council “to provide a complete procedure to ensure the integrity of awarding all contracts.” With certain limited exceptions, e.g. professional services, the Charter requires all contracts for supplies, materials, labor and public works to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. While this is a sound public contracting practice, and the appropriate default for the awarding of many city contracts, there are 94 of 446
7 b 8
other public contracting models that are both competitive but take into account other determinative factors besides price. These include the awarding of competitive requests for proposals for specialized services, design-build contracts, and construction manager – at risk contracts. In many cases these contracting models are not specifically awarded to “lowest responsible bid.” For example, in many cases, it may be appropriate or desirable to give weight to a proposer’s experience on a particular type of project rather than only setting minimum criteria that a bidder must satisfy to qualify.

This often requires the Council to “dispense” with competitive bidding even though the process itself was competitive, simply because the contract is not being awarded based solely on the proposal or bid being the lowest price. This can cause confusion and give an inaccurate appearance that the City is diverting from a competitive bidding practice in awarding contracts. Staff is requesting Council authority to draft Charter amendment language – subject to Council’s review and approval (and the voters’ approval) - that would provide flexibility in the Charter to maintain the variety of competitive bidding practices described above, but would also allow the City to utilize contract procurement processes alternative to “lowest responsible bid” when appropriate, without referring to the process as “dispensing” with competitive bidding.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Making the transition to a directly elected Mayor, an expanded Council, and Council districts will have cost impacts in terms of salary, benefits, and related costs associated with staffing a larger Council and a directly elected Mayor. Staff will provide an assessment of these costs prior to seeking Council’s approval to submit charter amendment language to the voters.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This activity involves organizational and administrative activities of the government related to election procedures and eligibility requirements, and such internal procedural and eligibility changes have no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. As such, this action is not a “project” subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 14 Cal. Code Regs § 15378.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES

1. The Council could provide direction to the City Attorney on the drafting of Charter amendments for the March 2024 election.

2. The Council could decline to direct the City Attorney to prepare Charter amendments.
95 of 446
8 b 8

3. The Council could select an alternative not identified by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Sample Charter Provisions of Role and Duties of Directly Elected Mayor

2. Charter City Salary Comparison – Councilmembers and Mayor 96 of 446

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that regarding the Report to Council dated July 11, 2023 pertaining to a Directly Elected Mayor, Council Districts, Council Compensation, Public Contracting and Miscellaneous Charter Amendments, the Council directs staff to commence drafting amendments to the Charter as follows:

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
97 of 446
Exhibit 1 – Mayoral Role and Duties
Alameda: Article VI. Mayor
Sec. 6-1. The Mayor shall be the official and ceremonial head of the City and shall preside at all meetings of the Council. They may take command of the Police and Fire Departments and govern the City by proclamation whenever the Council determines that public danger or emergency requires such action.

Sec. 6-2. During the absence or disability of the Mayor, the Vice Mayor of the Council shall perform the official duties of the Mayor, and during the absence or disability of both Sec. 6-3. Vacancies of the office of Mayor shall be filled by the Council.

Sec. 6-4. There is hereby appropriated to the use of the Mayor in the discharge of their office the sum of fifty dollars each month for which they need furnish no vouchers.

Anaheim: Section 504. Mayor
The Mayor shall have the same rights, privileges, powers and duties as are held by members of the City Council and shall be regarded as a member of the City Council for all purposes except to the extent expressly inconsistent with any other provision of this Charter or other applicable law.

The Mayor may make and second motions and shall have a voice and vote in all proceedings of the City Council. The Mayor shall be the official head of the City for ceremonial purposes. The Mayor shall have the primary, but not the exclusive, responsibility for communicating the policies, programs and needs of the City government to the people, and as occasion requires, he or she may inform the people of any major change in policy or program. The Mayor shall perform such other duties consistent with his or her office as may be prescribed by this Charter or as may be imposed by the City Council.

The Mayor shall serve for a term of four years and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

The City Council shall designate one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore, who shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the City Council. The Mayor Pro Tempore shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the Mayor's absence or disability.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter to the contrary, no person shall file nominating papers, or other equivalent declaration of candidacy as may be required or authorized by law, for election to both the office of Mayor and member of the City Council at the same election. The City Clerk shall reject, refuse to accept for filing, and otherwise refuse to process any such nominating papers or other declaration of candidacy for the office of Mayor or City Council member where such person has previously filed 98 of 446
nominating papers or a declaration of candidacy for election to the office of Mayor or City Council member at the same election. In the event a person seeks to simultaneously file nominating papers or declarations of candidacy for election to both the offices of Mayor and member of the City Council at the same election, the City Clerk shall reject, refuse to accept for filing, and otherwise refuse to process all such nominating papers or declarations of candidacy simultaneously tendered.

Berkeley: Section 21. The Mayor's Powers
The Mayor shall be the chairperson of the Council, and shall preside at the meetings of the Council and perform such other duties consistent with their office as may be imposed by the Council. They shall be entitled to a vote on all matters coming before the Council, but shall possess no veto power. They shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes, by the courts for the purposes of serving civil processes, and by the Governor for military purpose. They may use the title of Mayor in any case in which the execution of contracts or other legal instruments in writing, or other necessity arising from the general laws of this State, may so require; but this shall not be construed as conferring upon them administrative or judicial functions or other powers or functions of a Mayor, under the general laws of the State. The powers and duties of the Mayor shall be such as are conferred upon them by this amendment, together with such others as may be conferred by the Council in the pursuance of the provisions of this amendment, and no others.

Carlsbad: Silent
Chula Vista: Section 304 Presiding Officer, Mayor - (A) Duties (A) Duties. The Mayor shall be a member of the City Council and shall perform all the functions and have all the powers and rights of a duly elected Councilmember. In addition to said powers and duties, the Mayor shall have the power and duty:
(1) to report to the City Council annually on the affairs of the City and to recommend for its consideration such matters as the Mayor deems appropriate; (2) to be the official head of the City for all political and ceremonial purposes and, in the name and on behalf of the City, to sign all legal instruments and documents to which the City is a party except where otherwise provided herein or by applicable law, ordinance, or resolution, minute action, or order of the Council;
(3) to take command of the police, maintain order, and enforce the law during a time of extreme public danger or emergency, with the consent of the Council, and for such period as the council may fix, with the advice and support of the City Manager and City Attorney; (4) to assume the primary, but not the exclusive responsibility, for describing to the people the policies, programs and needs of the City government and for informing the 99 of 446
people of any major change in policy or program. The Mayor may represent the City in any and all matters involving other governmental agencies, provided that no act, promise, commitment or agreement entered into or committed by the Mayor shall be binding upon the City unless duly authorized or ratified by the City Council; (5) to represent the City in all regional public agencies which require an elected City official, unless otherwise determined by the City Council; (6) to supervise the operation of the mayor/council office and personnel assigned thereto; (7) to perform such other duties consistent with the office as may be prescribed by this Charter or delegated to the Mayor or imposed on the Mayor by the City Council if not inconsistent with the provisions of this Charter; and
(8) to exercise the full-time function as Mayor of the City during the usual business hours that the offices of the City are open, and such other hours and times as shall be necessary to discharge in full the duties imposed upon the Mayor.

Compton: Section 600. Presiding Officer. Mayor.

The member of the City Council to be nominated from the City at large and to be known as the Mayor shall be the presiding officer of the City Council. The Mayor shall have a voice and vote in all its proceedings. He shall be the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes and he shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter or as may be imposed by the City Council consistent with his office.

El Cajon: Silent
Fresno: Section 400. Power and Duties
The executive power of the City shall be vested in the office of the Mayor. The Mayor shall have the power to veto legislative and budgetary actions of the Council pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of this Charter. The Mayor shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the City, responsible for providing leadership and taking issues to the people and marshalling public interest in and support for municipal activity. The Mayor shall be responsible to the People of Fresno for the proper and efficient administration of all affairs of the City.

In addition to these general responsibilities, the Mayor shall have the following specific duties:
(a) The Mayor shall execute and enforce all laws and ordinances and policies of the City. (b) The Mayor shall have sole authority to appoint and remove the Chief Administrative Officer.
(c) The Mayor shall exercise control over the Chief Administrative Officer. 100 of 446
(d) The Mayor shall prepare or cause to be prepared the proposed annual City budget, and shall submit the same to the Council for its deliberation and approval. (e) The Mayor shall have the power of veto in all legislative matters which must be passed by the City Council, except as provided in this Chapter. (f) The Mayor shall have power of veto in all actions of Council relating to the budget, including line item budgetary veto authority over all programs and budgetary units. This authority includes the ability to reduce or eliminate the fiscal year funding to any program or budget unit.
(g) The Mayor shall not directly supervise any City department. (h) The Mayor shall provide the liaison between the Administrative Service and the Council, fostering a sense of cohesion among Councilmembers and educating the public about the needs and prospects of the City.
(i) The Mayor shall provide community leadership and actively promote economic development to broaden and strengthen the commercial and employment base of the City.
(j) The Mayor shall recommend to the Council such measures and ordinances as he or she may deem necessary or expedient and to make such other recommendations to the Council concerning the affairs of the City as the Mayor finds desirable. (k) The Mayor shall investigate those affairs of the City under the mayor's supervision.

Hayward: Section 604. Mayor (Powers and Duties)
Until the General Municipal Election next following the effective date of this section, the Council's presiding officer shall be selected and hold office as provided theretofore.

Thereafter, the elected Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes, and by the Courts for the purpose of serving civil processes. The Mayor shall be the presiding officer of the Council, shall preside at the meetings of the Council and shall sign the official documents of the Council. The Mayor shall be included as a member of the Council at all meetings of the Council for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. The Mayor shall be entitled to a vote on all matters coming before the Council, but shall possess no veto power. The Mayor may use the title of Mayor in all cases, but the same shall not be construed as conferring upon the Mayor's administrative or judicial functions or other powers or functions of a Mayor under the general laws of the State.

Inglewood: Article XX Section 1, 2, 3
The Mayor of the city shall be the chief executive of said city, and as such shall sign all contracts on behalf of the city, countersign all warrants, and perform such other duties as may from time to time be assigned to him by the council. In all other respects he shall 101 of 446
perform the same duties and have the same rights as any other member of the council.

The mayor shall preside at all meetings of the council and in case of his absence the council may appoint a mayor pro tempore and in case of the absence of the city clerk, any deputy or assistant city clerk may act as clerk, and in the absence of the said clerk or any of his deputies or assistants, the mayor or mayor pro tempore shall appoint one of the members of the council clerk pro tempore. In addition to any other duties which the Mayor and City Council are or may be required to perform they shall also be responsible for following supervising contract employees, attending meetings, necessary travel, oversight on policy development, providing constituent services and serving as the City's Parking Authority, Housing Authority, Public Financing Authority and Redevelopment Agency.

Irvine: Section 400 - Mayor and City Council
The City Council, hereinafter termed "Council," shall consist of a Mayor and four (4) Council members elected to office from the City at large in the manner provided in this Charter.

The Mayor shall serve a term of two (2) years. Any person who serves two (2) full terms as Mayor shall not be eligible to serve again as Mayor. If a Mayor serves a partial term in excess of one (1) year, it shall be considered a full term for the purpose of this provision. Other than as set forth herein, eligibility for office, compensation, vacancies and the filling of vacancies shall be the same for the office of Mayor as provided for the office of Council member by this Charter. The Mayor, in addition to serving as the presiding officer of the Council, shall have all of the rights, powers and duties of a Council member and shall be a member of the Council.

The term of office for a Council member shall be four (4) years. Alternatively, and successively, two (2) four-year terms shall be filled at one general municipal election and two (2) four-year terms at the next such election, consistent with the sequence of terms of Council members existing on the effective date hereof. Any person who serves two (2) full terms as a member of the City Council shall not be eligible to serve again as a member of the City Council. If a Council member serves a partial term in excess of two (2) years, it shall be considered a full term for the purpose of this provision.

If at any general municipal election, one (1) or more Council member, whose term of office will not expire as of the election, and who would be required to vacate the office of Council member if elected to the office of Mayor, files as a candidate for the office of Mayor, the following procedure will be used to fill the contingent vacancy in the office of Council member that would arise if the sitting Council member were elected Mayor: To the extent legally possible, the ballot for the office of Council member, the official election materials and voter information pamphlet shall notify the voters that they may cast ballots for not more than three (3) candidates for the office of Council member; that at least two (2) Council offices shall be filled by election; and that if a Council member whose term of office will not expire as of the election is elected to the office of Mayor, the vacancy in the office of that Council member shall be filled by the candidate for Council member receiving the third highest number of votes at the same municipal election.

The term of the Mayor and a Council member shall commence at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council following certification of the election results by the election official or such earlier other date as may be established by ordinance of the City Council, and he or she shall 102 of 446
serve until his or her successor qualifies. Any ties in voting and any determination with respect to which Council member is to fill which office shall be settled by the casting of lots. No person shall hold both the office of Mayor and Council member.

The term limits established by this section shall be applicable prospectively only. The term limits shall not apply to any term that began before November 4, 2014.

As used herein the term "qualifies" shall mean, in addition to the provisions of the general law, having taken the oath of office following the election and his or her term of office shall have commenced.

Lancaster: Section 202. The Mayor
In addition to any other authority granted to the Mayor by this Charter, the ordinances and regulations of the City or laws of the State, but not by way of limitation, as provided in Government Code Section 40605, the Mayor, with the consent of the City Council, shall have the authority to make all appointments to, or removals from all boards, commissions and committees.

Long Beach: Section 202. Mayor and Vice-Mayor
(a) DUTIES OF MAYOR.

The Mayor shall be the chief legislative officer of the City and as such shall have the power to veto actions of the City Council pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 213 of this Charter. The performance of the duties of the office of Mayor shall be considered as the full-time employment of the person occupying that office. The Mayor shall preside at meetings of the City Council. The Mayor shall have no vote, but may participate fully in the deliberations and proceedings of the City Council. The Mayor shall be recognized as head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes and by the governor for purposes of military law, but shall have no administrative duties other than those provided for in Section 207. The Mayor shall represent the City at large and utilize the office of Mayor to provide community leadership and as a focal point for the articulation of city-wide perspectives on municipal issues.

On or before the 15th day of January of each year, the Mayor shall communicate by message to the City Council a statement of the conditions and affairs of the City, and make recommendations on such matters as the Mayor may deem expedient and proper. (b) NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF MAYOR.

Candidates for the office of Mayor shall be nominated by the City at large at the primary nominating election. In the event that no candidate for nomination to the office of Mayor receives a majority of the votes cast for all candidates for the office of Mayor at the primary nominating election, the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the office of Mayor at the primary nominating election shall be the candidates and the only candidates for such office whose names shall be printed upon the ballots to be used at the general municipal election. (c) TERM OF MAYOR.
103 of 446
In 1988, a Mayor shall first be nominated and elected by the City at large in the manner provided in Subsection 202(b) of this Charter for a term of two (2) years, and, commencing in 1990 and thereafter, for a term of four (4) years, from the date he or she shall take office after being duly elected Mayor, or until a successor shall be elected and take office. The term of the Mayor shall commence on the third Tuesday of July following his or her election, and he or she shall serve until his or her successor qualifies.
(d) NO PERSON CAN BE CANDIDATE FOR TWO ELECTED CITY OFFICES AT THE SAME TIME.

A person cannot be a candidate at the same election for two or more of the elected City offices. (e) VACANCY IN OFFICE OF MAYOR.

In the event of a vacancy occurring in the office of the Mayor, existing by reason of any cause, the Council shall immediately cause an election to be held to fill such vacancy, which election shall be called within sixty (60) days after such vacancy occurs and shall be held within one hundred and twenty (120) days after such vacancy occurs, provided that if such vacancy occurs within one hundred and twenty (120) days, but not less than eighty-eight (88) days, from the date of a municipal primary nominating election at which the office of Mayor would regularly be filled, the City Council shall not cause a special election to be held to fill the vacancy but said vacancy shall be filled as a part of the regular election process. If elected by a specially called election pursuant to this Subsection 202(e), the Mayor so elected shall serve for the remainder of the unexpired term of the Mayor whose vacation of the office has caused the special election to be held.
(f) VICE-MAYOR.

The Council shall biennially, at the same time that Councilmembers regularly take office for new terms, select one of its members who shall be the Vice-Mayor. The Vice-Mayor shall perform all duties and, except for the power to veto actions of the City Council, may exercise all powers of the Mayor as prescribed by this Charter or by ordinance when the Mayor is absent, unable to perform his or her duties or has vacated the office by reason of any cause and until a successor has been elected and taken office.

Modesto: Section 601. Powers and Duties of Mayor
The Mayor shall have the following powers and duties:
(a) The Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all political, representative and ceremonial purposes and by the Governor for military purposes; (b) The Mayor may review with the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk prior to each Council meeting the items on the Council's agenda and to add matters thereto; (c) The Mayor may make recommendations to the City Manager on matters of policy and programs;
104 of 446
(d) The Mayor may direct the Charter Officers to prepare and provide information to the Council on matters of policy and programs which require Council decision; (e) The Mayor may request budgetary and any other information from the Charter Officers that the Mayor determines is necessary for the conduct of the Mayor's duties; (f) The Mayor, together with the Council, annually shall conduct a written performance evaluation of each Charter Officer which shall include, without limitation, an evaluation of the Charter Officer's performance in implementing the Council's Statement of Policy for that Charter Officer developed pursuant to Section 725 of this Charter.
(g) The Mayor may appoint, with the advice and consent of the Council, a Chairman, a ViceChairman, one regular member and one alternate member to each standing, special and ad hoc committee of the Council;
(h) The Mayor may appoint, with the advice and consent of the Council, such advisory boards, commissions and ad hoc committees as may be necessary or desirable to advise and assist in the work of the Council;
(i) The Mayor may appoint such other advisory boards and ad hoc committees as may be necessary or desirable to advise and assist in the work of the Mayor; provided, however, that the members of such advisory boards or ad hoc committees shall not receive any compensation; (j) The Mayor may recommend adjustments to the City budget and to propose the modification or curtailment of any city service. If the Mayor recommends any increases in the City budget, the Mayor shall recommend the method of financing such expenditures. If the Mayor proposes the modification or curtailment of any city service, the Mayor shall provide specific recommendations and the reasons for such proposal;
(k) The Mayor shall prepare and deliver the Mayor's Proposed Budget Priorities and Direction and the Mayor's Budget Message pursuant to Section 1302A of the Charter and the Mayor's Final Budget Modifications pursuant to Section 1303 of the Charter; (l) The Mayor may select and hire staff to the office of Mayor and the City Council as may be necessary or desirable to advise and assist in the work of the Mayor and City Council; provided, however, that the Mayor shall not appoint to any position any business associate or any person related to him or her or to the City Manager or to any member of the Council by blood or marriage within the second degree. If staff is provided to the Council under this section, such staff shall be provided on an equal basis to each member of the Council. All such appointees shall serve at the pleasure of the Mayor in the Unclassified Service; and shall serve under such terms and conditions, salaries and benefits as are similar to other employees in Modesto's service. In the event an employee of the City who holds a Classified Service position is appointed to a position in the Unclassified Service under this Section, he or she may return to a position in the Classified Service. Such return to the Classified Service shall be without loss of any rights or privileges that currently pertain to the Classified Service;
(m) When a vacancy occurs, the Mayor shall nominate at least two candidates for Council consideration for appointment to the position of City Manager. The Mayor may express to the Council a preference among final candidates;
105 of 446
(n) After consultation with the Council, the Mayor may comment in writing upon the independent, written performance evaluation conducted annually by the City Manager of each head of a city department which is under the administration of the City Manager; (o) The Mayor may attend and participate in executive meetings of the City Manager and heads of City departments which are under the administration of the City Manager; (p) In time of public danger or emergency, the Mayor may, with the consent of the Council, or pending a meeting of the Council, direct the administration of the City Government through the City Manager;
(q) The Mayor shall be charged with the duty of making recommendations to the Council on all major matters of policy and program which require Council decision. The Mayor shall have the primary, but not exclusive, responsibility for interpreting the policies, programs and needs of the City government to the community;
(r) The Mayor may also, on the Mayor's own account, as may each individual Councilmember, inform the community on any matters of policy or program which the Mayor believes the welfare of the community makes necessary;
(s) It shall be the duty of the Mayor to represent the Council in its relationships with civic groups within the City, and by direction of the Council, the Mayor shall represent the City in its relationships with other governmental agencies on matters of policy and program. (t) The Mayor shall preside at meetings of the Council and shall have a vote as a member of the Council. The Mayor shall have no power to veto any ordinance or resolution adopted by the Council;
(u) The Mayor shall have authority to preserve order at all Council meetings and to remove or cause the removal of any person from any meeting of the Council for disorderly conduct, to enforce the rules of the Council, and to determine the order of business under the rules of the Council;
(v) The Mayor shall exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be consistent with the Mayor's office or as may be granted to the Mayor by the Council not inconsistent with this Charter.

Nothing in this section shall be construed in any way as an infringement or limitation on the powers and duties of the City Manager as chief administrative officer and head of the administrative branch of the City government as prescribed in other sections of this Charter.

Oceanside: Silent
Palmdale: Silent
106 of 446
Pasadena: Section 406. The Mayor
The Mayor shall be nominated and elected by the voters of the City at large for a term of four years, except as provided in Section 401 (B). The Mayor shall be a voting member of the City Council and shall preside at meetings of the City Council. The Mayor shall act as chief executive of the City in performing all acts required to be performed under the laws of the State of California and this Charter. The Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes, by the Courts for the purpose of serving civil process and by the Governor of the State for military purposes. The Mayor shall have a voice and vote in all proceedings of the City Council and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter or as may be imposed by the City Council consistent with his or her office.

Pomona: Section 406. Mayor
The Mayor, in addition to the powers and duties prescribed elsewhere in this Charter, shall have the power and duty:
(a) To report to the Council on the affairs of the City and to recommend for its consideration such matters as may be deemed of current and on-going concern. (b) To report to the citizens the policies, programs and needs of City government and inform the people of any major change in those policies or programs. (c) To be the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes. (d) To exercise and perform such other powers and duties as may be delegated to or required by this Charter or by the Council if not inconsistent with the provisions of this Charter.

Richmond: Section 2. Powers and Duties of the Mayor
The Mayor shall be a member of the City Council and shall have all of the powers and duties of a member of the Council unless otherwise specified herein. In addition, the Mayor shall have the following powers and duties:
(a) Political Position. The Mayor shall be the chief elected officer and ceremonial head of the City, responsible for providing civic leadership and taking issues to the people, and marshalling public interest in and support for municipal activity. The Mayor shall be concerned with the general development of the community and the general level of City services and activity programs and may develop and inform City residents of policies and programs which he or she believes are necessary for the welfare of the City.
(b) Policy, Program and Budget. The Mayor may make recommendations to the City Council on matters of policy and program which require Council decision and may propose ordinances and resolutions for Council consideration. The Mayor shall work with the City Manager in preparing an annual budget for submission to the City Council. The Mayor shall make an annual report to the City Council as to the conditions and affairs of the City. (c) (As amended at election November 6, 1984 and November 2,2004) Appointments and Removals. The Mayor shall have the authority at any regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council to make appointments to or removals from all City boards, commissions and committees 107 of 446
with the concurrence of at least four (4) other members of the City Council. (Added at the election November 2, 2004) Effective with the November 2008 election, the Mayor shall have the authority at any regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council to make appointments to or removals from all City boards, commissions and committees with the concurrence of at least three (3) other members of the City Council.
(d) Relationship with City Council. The Mayor shall be a voting member of and preside over meetings of the City Council. The Mayor shall annually appoint standing committees of the City Council; provided that the Mayor shall not be a member of such committees. Reports of the standing committees shall be made at regular City Council meetings or whenever the Mayor shall so require.
(e) (As amended at election November 2, 2004) Continuance Authority. The Mayor shall have the authority to continue any item being considered by the City Council at a Council meeting for up to two weeks. The Council may override an action taken by the Mayor to continue an item by the affirmative vote of five (5) members of the Council. (Added at the election November 2, 2004) Effective with the November 2008 election, the Mayor shall have the authority to continue any item being considered by the City Council at a Council meeting for up to two weeks. The Council may override an action taken by the Mayor to continue an item by the affirmative vote of four members of the Council.
(f) Administrative Responsibility. The Mayor shall sign all contracts on behalf of the City which are acted upon and approved by the City Council unless otherwise delegated by the City Council to a City official or employee, and shall exercise such other.

Riverside: Section 405. Duties of Mayor
The Mayor shall be the presiding officer at all meetings of the City Council and shall have a voice in all its proceedings but shall not vote except to break a City Council tie-vote which exists for any cause. The Mayor shall be the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes. The Mayor shall have the primary but not exclusive responsibility for interpreting the policies, programs and needs of the City government to the people, and of informing the people of any major change in policy or program. The Mayor shall advise the City Council on all matters of policy and public relations and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter. During the months of January or February, the Mayor shall deliver a State of the City message at any location within the City that the Mayor deems appropriate at which the Mayor will present the Mayor's programs, objectives and priorities.

The City Council shall designate one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore, who shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the City Council. In the absence of the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall assume the duties of the Mayor. The Mayor Pro Tempore shall conduct the Council meetings and shall vote only as a member of the Council, not as Mayor Pro Tempore. In the event of a tie vote, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall not have a tie-breaking vote and Council vote shall be recorded as a negative or "nay" vote. With regards to the veto power, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall not have the power to veto acts of the City Council.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Charter, when a tie-vote exists for any cause, in order to break that tie, the Mayor shall have the same voting right as a member of the City Council for or against the item before the City Council. The Mayor's vote shall be deemed a City Council 108 of 446
member's vote for all purposes, including the introduction or adoption of both ordinances and resolutions.

Salinas: Section 5.1. Mayor
(a) The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council, and shall perform such other duties as are generally required of a presiding officer. S/he shall have a voice and vote in all its proceedings but shall have no veto power, and shall be recognized as the official head of the City.
(b) The Mayor shall sign all conveyances made by Salinas and all contracts to which it is a party and shall acknowledge the execution of all instruments executed by the City that require acknowledgment.

Sacramento: Section 40. Mayor – Functions
(a) The presiding officer of the city shall be the mayor. (b) The mayor:
(1) Shall be recognized as the official head of the city for the performance of all duties lawfully delegated to the mayor by this Charter, by action of the council or by other laws. (2) Shall provide leadership within the community in the sense that the mayor shall have the primary, but not exclusive, responsibility of interpreting the policies, programs and needs of city government to the people, and as the occasion requires, may inform the people of any change in policy or program;
(3) Shall have the right but not the exclusive power to make recommendations to the city council on matters of policy and program that require council decisions; (4) Shall be a member of the city council and shall be entitled to make and second motions on matters before the city council and vote on city council actions, but shall possess no veto power over actions of the city council;
(5) Shall be included within the terms “council” and “city council” used in this Charter unless otherwise expressly provided;
(6) May propose ordinances and resolutions which shall be considered by the city council; (7) Shall appoint and may remove members of the boards and commissions and advisory agencies in accordance with Article XV except as otherwise provided in this Charter; (8) Shall have and exercise such other powers and duties as provided in this Charter, the laws of the state, and ordinances and resolutions of the city. 109 of 446
San Bernardino: Section 303. Powers and Duties of the Mayor The Mayor shall have the following powers and perform the following duties, in addition to others as specified in this Charter:
(a) Attend and preside at meetings of the Council and may participate fully in all discussions, but shall not be entitled to vote except in the event of a tie, to veto a matter, and as otherwise provided in this Charter;
(b) Have the authority to veto any Council action approved by fewer than five (5) members of the Council;
(c) Shall participate in the vote (1) to appoint or remove the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk and fix their compensation and (2) to appoint or remove members of boards, commissions or committees, except committees made up wholly of less than a majority of City Council members;
(d) Appoint the members and officers of Council committees (committees made up wholly of less than a majority of City Council members), and perform other duties as specified by the Council;
(e) Be recognized as the head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes and by the governor for purposes of military law;
(f) Be the chief spokesperson for the City; and
(g) Represent the City in intergovernmental relations and establish and maintain partnerships and regional leadership roles to advance the City's interest; and may delegate such roles to other members of the Council; and
(h) Execute all ordinances, resolutions and contracts approved by the City Council except as otherwise authorized by the City Council.

The Mayor shall have no administrative, appointment or removal powers except as otherwise provided in this Charter.

The office of Mayor shall be a full-time position and the incumbent shall not engage in any business, professional or occupational activities that interfere with the discharge of the duties of the office.

San Luis Obispo: Section 407. Mayor - Powers and Duties The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the City Council and perform such other duties consistent with the office as may be imposed by the Council or by vote of the people. The Mayor shall be entitled to, and must vote when present, but shall possess no veto power. As presiding officer of the Council, the Mayor will faithfully communicate the will of the Council majority to the City Manager in matters of policy. The Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes.
110 of 446
Santa Ana: Section 404 – Presiding Officer, Mayor
The mayor shall be a member of the City Council and shall preside over the meetings of the City Council. The mayor shall have voice and vote in all of the City Council's proceedings and shall be recognized as head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes. The mayor shall have no administrative duties but shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this charter, or imposed by the City Council, consistent with their office.

The mayor shall be elected by the voters of the City at large at each general municipal election in November of even-numbered years for a two-year term commencing on the same date as the terms of other council members elected in such year. No person may be a candidate for mayor and a candidate for any other office on the City Council in the same election. In the event an incumbent City Council member other than the mayor is elected mayor such other office shall become vacant at the time they assume office as mayor and the City Council shall call a special election to fill the vacancy.

To be eligible to be elected to the office of mayor a person must be a qualified voter as provided for in the Elections Code of the State of California. If the mayor is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, the office shall immediately become vacant and be so declared by the city council.

Santa Barbara: Section 504. The Mayor
The Mayor shall be the presiding officer at all meetings of the City Council and shall be included as a member of the City Council for all purposes under this Charter unless otherwise expressly provided. He shall be counted in determining a quorum and shall be entitled to vote on all matters but shall possess no veto power. The mayor may make and second motions and shall have a voice and vote in all its proceedings. He shall be the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes. He shall have the primary but not the exclusive responsibility for interpreting the policies, programs and needs of the City government to the people, and as occasion requires, he may inform the people of any change in policy or program. He shall perform such other duties consistent with his office as may be prescribed by this Charter or as may be imposed by the City Council.

Santa Clara: Section 704.3 Mayor - Powers and Duties
The Mayor shall have the following powers and duties:
(a) The Mayor shall have the power to make recommendations to the City Council on matters of policy and programs which require City Council decision; provided, that if he/she recommends any increases in the City budget, he/she shall recommend the method of financing such expenditure; and provided, further, that if he/she proposes curtailment of service, such recommendations and his/her reason therefor shall be specific. He/she may also, on his/her own account, inform the community on matters of policy or program which he/she believes the welfare of the community make necessary.
(b) The Mayor shall preside at meetings of the City Council and shall have the vote as a member of the City Council. He/she shall have no veto power.
111 of 446
(c) The Mayor shall have authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any meeting of the City Council for disorderly conduct, to enforce the rules of the City Council and to determine the order of business under the rules of the City Council.
(d) The Mayor shall exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the City Council, provided that the same are not inconsistent with this Charter.

Nothing in this section shall be construed in any way as an infringement or limitation on the powers and duties of the City Manager as Chief Administrative Officer and head of the administrative branch of the City government as prescribed in other sections of this Charter. Except as otherwise herein provided, the Mayor shall possess only such authority over the City Manager and the administrative branch as he/she possesses as one member of the City Council. (Added by electors at election held November 5, 1968, approved by Joint Resolution of Legislature filed with the Secretary of State January 15, 1969; Amended by electors at an election held March 7, 2000, Charter Chapter 11 of the State Statutes of 2000)
Santa Cruz: Section 604. Presiding Officer – Mayor
(a) The Mayor shall be elected at-large, shall preside at the meetings of the Council, be a voting member of the Council, shall have a voice and vote in all Council proceedings, and shall be recognized as the titular head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes and by the Governor for purposes of military law but shall have no regular administrative duties. (b) The Mayor shall have the discretion to set City Council agendas and to change the order of business on the agendas provided, however, that an item may be added to a future City Council agenda at the direction of three members of the City Council. (c) The Mayor shall have the primary but not exclusive responsibility for interpreting the policies, programs, and needs of the City government to the people, and, as occasion requires, the Mayor may inform the people of any change in policy or program. (d) The Mayor shall perform such other duties consistent with the office as may be prescribed by this Charter or as may be imposed by the City Council.
(e) The City shall maintain a “Council-Manager” form of government, and the Mayor possesses only such authority over the City Manager and the administrative branch as he or she possesses as one member of the Council.
(f) The Council shall elect a Vice-Mayor, who shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the City Council. The Vice-Mayor shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the Mayor's absence or disability. The Vice-Mayor shall be elected by the Council at the second meeting in November in each non-election year, and at the first regularly or specially scheduled evening Council meeting following the County election official’s certification of the general municipal election results in each election year. The Mayor and Vice-Mayor so elected shall serve until their successors have been elected. Nothing herein shall prevent a Councilmember from serving consecutive terms as Vice-Mayor.
112 of 446
Santa Maria: Silent
Stockton: Section 1102. Powers and Duties
The Mayor shall have the following powers and duties:
(a) To review with the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk prior to each Council meeting the items on the Council’s agenda and to add matters thereto; (b) To make recommendations to the Council on matters of policy and programs which require Council decision;
(c) To make recommendations to the City Manager on matters of policy and programs; (d) To direct those officials appointed by the Council to prepare and provide information to the Council on matters of policy and programs which require Council decision; (e) To request budgetary and any other information from those officials appointed by the Council that the Mayor determines is necessary for the conduct of the Mayor’s duties; (f) To appoint, with the advice and consent of the Council, a Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, one regular member and one alternate member to each standing, special and ad hoc committee of the Council;
(g) To appoint, with the advice and consent of the Council, such advisory boards, commissions and ad hoc committees as may be necessary or desirable to advise and assist in the work of the City Council. All members of the Council, including the Mayor and Vice-Mayor, may be so appointed;
(h) To appoint such other advisory boards and ad hoc committees as may be necessary or desirable to advise and assist in the work of the Mayor; provided, however, that the members of such advisory boards or ad hoc committees shall not receive any compensation; (i) To address, not less than annually, the citizens of the City concerning the current status of City affairs and articulating the policy plans which the Mayor proposes for the City during the ensuing year;
(j) To inform the citizens, at other times during the year, of any matters of policy or programs which the Mayor believes are for the welfare of the community; (k) To recommend adjustments to the City Budget and to propose the modification or curtailment of any city service. If the Mayor recommends any increases in the City budget, the Mayor shall recommend the method of financing such expenditures. If the Mayor proposes the modification or curtailment of any city service, the Mayor shall provide specific recommendations and the reasons for such proposal;
(l) To preside at meetings of the Council and to vote as a member of the Council without power of veto;
113 of 446
(m) To preserve order at all Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any meeting of the Council for disorderly conduct, to enforce the rules of the Council and to determine the order of business under the rules of the Council; (n) To select and appoint, with the advice and consent of the Council, such professional, technical and clerical employees to the office of Mayor as may be necessary or desirable to advise and assist in the work of the Mayor; provided, however, that the Mayor shall not appoint to any position any business associate or any person related to him or her or to the City Manager or to any member of the Council by blood and marriage within the third degree, except that the foregoing prohibition against nepotism may be waived by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Council if the Council finds that the proposed appointment is in the interest of the City. All such appointees shall serve at the pleasure of the Mayor in the unclassified service; and shall serve under such terms and conditions, salaries and benefits as are similar to other unclassified employees. The Council shall provide in the annual budget funding for no less than three positions in the office of the Mayor, including the Public Information Officer appointed by the Mayor pursuant to Section 1151 of Article XI;
(o) To exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Council, provided the same are not inconsistent with this Charter.

Nothing in this Section shall be construed in any way as an infringement or limitation on the powers and duties of the City Manager as Chief Administrative Officer and head of the administrative branch of the City government as prescribed in other sections of this Charter.

Except as otherwise provided in this Charter, the Mayor shall possess only such authority over the City Manager and the administrative branch as he or she possesses as one member of the Council.

Sunnyvale: Section 607. Presiding Officer. Mayor
The mayor shall be a member of the City Council and shall preside over the meetings of the City Council. The mayor shall have voice and vote in all of the City Council's proceedings and shall be recognized as head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes. The mayor shall have no administrative duties but shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this charter, or imposed by the City Council, consistent with their office.

To be eligible to be elected to the office of mayor a person must be a qualified voter as provided for in the Elections Code of the State of California. If the mayor is convicted of 114 of 446
a crime involving moral turpitude, the office shall immediately become vacant and be so declared by the city council.

Torrance: 610 The Mayor
The Mayor shall preside at the meetings of the City Council, and in case of his absence or inability to act, the City Council shall appoint a Mayor Pro Tempore, who shall serve only until such time as the Mayor returns and is able to act, and for such period shall have all the powers and duties of the Mayor. The Mayor shall be a member of the City Council for all purposes and shall have all the rights, powers and duties of a member of the City Council in addition to those powers and duties conferred upon him by virtue of his office as Mayor. Unless otherwise expressly provided to the contrary, any provision in this Charter which relates to the City Council or to members of the City Council shall be interpreted to include the Mayor as a member of the City Council. The Mayor shall sign all warrants drawn on the City Treasury, and shall sign all written contracts required by ordinance to be approved by the City Council and all conveyances made up or entered into by said City. The Mayor shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations, to take affidavits and to testify the same under his hand. The Mayor is authorized to acknowledge the execution of all instruments executed by said City that are required to be acknowledged. (Ratified Spec. Mun. Elec. 10/29/57, Amend. No 2; Approved by State Legislature Concurrent Res. No. 1 on 2/4/58). (Ratified Gen. Mun. Elec. 3/7/78, filed with Sec'y of State 3/27/78, Recorded with County Recorder, Los Angeles County 6/20/78).

Vallejo: Section 318. Powers and Duties of the Mayor
The Mayor shall preside at meetings of the Council, shall have a vote in all matters before the Council, and shall be recognized as the head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes.

Vista: Silent
115 of 446
EXHIBIT 2 – Charter City Salaries
City Councilmember
Salary/Month
Mayor Salary/
Month
Charter Requirement
Alameda $25,997.00 $25,997.00 Annual salary not to exceed 30% of the salary for all "Occupations, United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, San FranciscoOakland-Hayward Area.” The specific salary amount and payment details will be determined by a Council resolution.

Alhambra $917.00 $993.00 $50/mo. for Council; $75/mo. for Mayor; Adjusted per State Law.

Anaheim $1,500.00 $1,500.00 State Law
Burbank $1,548.00 $1,548.00 State Law
Carlsbad $2,264.18 $2,364.18 Charter Silent; Salaries Established By Ordinance Chula Vista $5,085.84 $12,714.59
(the directly
elected Mayor
is a full-time
position)
Mayor: 66% of the salary of Superior Court judges in the State; Council: 40% of the salary of the Mayor
Compton $600.00 $600.00 Charter: $600 per month
Culver City $485.12 $485.12 State Law
El Cajon $2,194.00 $3,176.00 State Law.

Fresno $6,666.67 $10,833.33
(the directly
elected Mayor
is a full-time
position and
has strongmayor elements
in the role)
Charter allows Council to establish by ordinance
Hayward $2,081.25 $3,330.00 Charter allows Council to establish by ordinance Inglewood $5,055.01 $9,275.25 Initially set by ordinance not to exceed average household income in Los Angeles County. Subsequent adjustments
116 of 446
permitted in an amount not to exceed the 5% annual cap set in State Law.

Irvine $880.00 $880.00 State Law
Lancaster $600.00 $600.00 Council can adopt ordinance by 4/5ths vote Long Beach $3,540.00 $14,158.00
(the directly
elected Mayor
is a full-time
position)
(a) Commencing with the first Mayor to assume the office of Mayor on or after July 1, 1988, the Mayor shall receive an annual salary of Sixty-seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($67,500.00), which salary shall be automatically adjusted on July 1, 1989, and on July 1 of each year thereafter equivalent to the most recent upward change in the annual average of the Consumer Price Index as published by the United States
Department of Labor for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim metropolitan area.

For purposes of calculating the annual adjustment under this section the base year shall be that year ending with the quarter ending December 31, 1988. The Mayor's salary shall first be adjusted on July 1, 1989, and annually thereafter, based on the annually calculated change from the base year.
(b) Each member of the City Council shall receive a salary which shall be twenty-five percent of that provided for the Mayor under Subsection (a) of this Section 203.

Modesto $2,000.00 $3,600.00 Upon Recommendation of Citizen’s Salary Setting Commission Oceanside $1,932.75 $2,107.92 Charter Silent
Palmdale $759.00 $1,265.00 Charter Silent
Palo Alto $1,000.00 $1,000.00 State Law
Pasadena $1,742.65 $2,613.78 Initially established by a compensation commission.

Adjustments permitted every two years not to exceed 5% per year.

Pomona $819.00 $1,638.00 Council salaries established pursuant to limits in state law.

Adjustments per CPI. Mayor’s salary twice that of Council. 117 of 446
Richmond $1,402.50 $3,875.00 Charter Initially Set Mayor’s Salary at $3,000. Subject to adjustment by five votes of Council, not including the Mayor.

Council salary established and adjusted per State Law.

Riverside $3,448.00 $6,897.00 Per the Charter, the Council reviews salaries of Council and Mayor in January of every odd-numbered year. It may adjust salaries in an amount not to exceed 5 percent.

Salinas $276.92 bi-weekly $369.23 biweekly
State Law
Sacramento $8,566.08 $13,683.75
(Mayor is fulltime)
Compensation Commission established by Charter shall meet at least once a year. Compensation must be reasonable and consistent with other cities similar in size and structure.

San Bernardino $3,125.00 $4,166.67 Established/adjusted by Council ordinance following a public hearing and giving due recommendation to an advisory
commission charged with periodic review of compensation for elected positions. Compensation of Mayor shall be
commensurate with that for a full-time position.

San Luis Obispo $987 bi-weekly $1,244 biweekly
By ordinance. Reviewed in even-numbered years. Mayor to receive greater compensation than councilmembers.

Santa Ana $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Established per the formula in State Law. No adjustments without voter approval.

Santa Barbara $4,671.33 $5,839.17 Beginning July 1, 2005, Mayor’s salary set at 100% of Area Median Income (AMI). Councilmembers salary set at 80% AMI.

Compensation reduced by $25 per meeting of Council,
including study sessions, missed.

Santa Clara $2,000.00 $2,500.00 Effective July 1, 2017, Council salaries set at $2,000 per month and Mayor’s salary set at $2,500. Commencing on July 1, 2019, Council and Mayor salaries set by Salary Setting
Commission.

Santa Cruz $1,710.35 $3,420.68 Council salaries established at $1,000 per month and Mayor salary established at $2,000 per month. Adjustments permitted by Council not to exceed 5% per year.

Santa Maria $1,956.90 $1,956.90 Charter Silent. Salaries set by Municipal Code. 118 of 446
Santa Monica $1,385.00 $1,661.00 Council salaries initially set at $750 per month and Mayor salary initially set at $900 per month. Automatic increases on July 1 of each year set to CPI.

Santa Rosa $800.00 $1,200.00 State Law
Stockton $2,447.04 $7,540.30 Salary of Council and Mayor adopted by Council upon recommendation of a Salary Setting Commission. Council may adopt the Commission’s recommendation or a lesser amount, but not a greater amount. The Mayor’s compensation shall be greater than the Council.

Sunnyvale $2,913.38 $3,884.52 Effective January 1, 2012, salaries of Council established at $2,088.64 per month and Mayor at $2,784.86 per month.

Annual CPI increases thereafter.

Torrance $100.00 $100.00 Charter limitation of $100 per month.

Vallejo $1,225.00 $1,225.00 State Law.

Ventura $600.00 $700.00 Established amounts per the Charter.

Vista $2,955.00 $3,067.00 Charter Silent. Established by Municipal Code. 119 of 446
8c

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Consideration of Adopting a Resolution Denouncing Antisemitism and all Forms of Hatred and Prejudice

1. Resolution Denouncing Antisemitism and all forms of hatred and prejudice

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City received a letter from the Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys requesting the City Council’s support to bring forward a resolution denouncing antisemitism, hatred, and prejudice. The Anti-Defamation League recorded 3,697 incidents of assault, harassment, and vandalism in 2022, a 36% increase over 2021 reported incidents. Several cities in San Gabriel Valley have adopted such resolutions.

The intent of this staff report is to request City Council’s consideration of adopting a resolution denouncing antisemitism and all forms of hatred and prejudice. Establishing this resolution would provide continued support in promoting inclusion and equity and will stand up to hatred and prejudice.
120 of 446
2 c 8

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A

RECOMMENDATION
That City Council consider adopting the resolution denouncing antisemitism, and all forms of hatred and prejudice.

BACKGROUND
The City received a letter on April 18, 2023 from the Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys requesting the City Council’s support to bring forward a resolution denouncing antisemitism, hatred, and prejudice.

ANALYSIS
Antisemitism, including harassment on the basis of actual or perceived Jewish origin, ancestry, ethnicity, identity, affiliation, or faith, remains a persistent, pervasive, and disturbing problem in contemporary American society. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) recorded 3,697 incidents of assault, harassment, and vandalism in 2022, a 36% increase over 2021 reported incidents. The ADL also reported that widespread belief in antisemitic conspiracy theories and tropes nearly doubled since 2019 and remain at the highest levels in 30 years. According to the American Jewish Committee’s 2021 State of Antisemitism in America report, one in four American Jews has been the target of antisemitism over the past 12 months including verbal or physical attacks, harassment online or on social media. Discrimination on the basis of religion, race, and ethnicity is unlawful under the County’s human rights law, as well as under state and federal law.

Staff has prepared a resolution denouncing antisemitism for the City Council’s consideration. The Resolution Denouncing Antisemitism for Council consideration, from the Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys, has been adopted by the cities of Claremont, Upland, Monrovia, Alhambra, Sierra Madre, Temple City, Dimond Bar, Pasadena, South Pasadena, Walnut, and San Gabriel.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
N/A

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements. 121 of 446
3 c 8

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Pass the resolution in support of denouncing antisemitism, and all forms of hatred and prejudice.

Alternative 2: Choose not to approve this resolution.

Alternative 3: City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Armineh Hoonanian, Principal Administrative Officer
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: April 18, 2023 letter from the Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys
122 of 446
RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

DENOUNCING ANTISEMITISM AND ALL FORMS OF HATRED AND PREJUDICE WHEREAS, the City of Glendale is committed to inclusion and advancement of diversity and equity for people of all races, ethnicities, national origins, religions, ages, genders, and backgrounds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale takes great pride in diversity and respect for all people, and the Jewish community is an important part of the City’s fabric, recognizing our diversity as a key strength for the City and our Character; and WHEREAS, the City of Glendale supports efforts directed at eradicating antisemitism and all forms of hatred, and supports expanded education programs, including Holocaust programs, to counter intolerance and discrimination; and WHEREAS, the City of Glendale condemns antisemitism in all its forms, including: hatred and prejudice directed towards Jewish community members; stereotypes or conspiracy theories about Jews; Holocaust denial or distortion, and; extremist indoctrination or recruitment related to any form of antisemitism; and WHEREAS, the City of Glendale affirms that hatred and bias in any form are not acceptable in our community. The City of Glendale remains committed to our vision of welcoming and serving the people of Glendale to create a community that offers a high quality of life; and
WHEREAS, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) recorded 3,697 incidents of assault, harassment, and vandalism in 2022, a 36% increase over 2021 reported incidents. The ADL also reported that widespread belief in antisemitic conspiracy theories and tropes nearly doubled since 2019 and remain at the highest levels in 30 years; and
WHEREAS, any victims of antisemitism in the City of Glendale are urged to report any incidents so that local law enforcement can respond, track such incidents, and bring perpetrators to justice; and
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale, on behalf of its citizen and as supporters and allies of our Jewish community, does hereby proclaim the City of Glendale’s condemnation of antisemitism. The City of Glendale strongly stands against hate, bias, or violence based on identity and remains committed to the principles of nondiscrimination and human rights.
123 of 446

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1. That the City of Glendale condemns all forms of hate, racism, and violence perpetrated, tolerated, or encouraged by any group or individual.

SECTION 2. The City of Glendale supports our Jewish community members and condemns racism, intolerance, hate and violent attacks against them.

SECTION 3. That the City of Glendale is committed to protecting all residents and to be treated fairly, with dignity, and to have their humanity, existence, history, and contributions valued.

Adopted this _____ day of July, 2023.
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
124 of 446

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________
City Clerk
125 of 446
President
Julie Solberg
Vice President
David Levy
Chief Financial Officer
John Carlton*
Secretary
Julie Bank
Board of Governors
Mickey Bernath
Avi Bilu
Julie Gamberg
Lawrence Lurvey
Jeanine Mann
Stuart Miller*
Oran Reznik
Past Federation President
Executive Director
Jason Moss, MSW, MAJCS
Program and Community
Outreach Director
Rebecca Russell
Cultural Arts
Program Coordinator
Cantor Judy Sofer
Operations and
Communications Manager
Karen Galeana
PJ Library and PJ OurWay
Program Coordinator
Debby Singer
PJ Library and PJ OurWay
Program Assistant
Robyn Brahinksy
Camp Gan Shalom Director
Annabella Tornek
JEWISH
FEDERATION OF THE GREATER SAN GABR\EL

AND POMONA
April 18, 2023
Mayor Ardy Kassakhian
City of Glendale
Glendale City Hall
613 E. Broadway, Suite 200
Glendale, CA 91206
Dear Mayor Kassakhian,
My name is Jason Moss, and I
am the Executive Director of the Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys. The mission of the Jewish Federation is to build community by strengthening and enhancing Jewish life for the estimated 30,000 - 45,000 Jews living between Glendale and Rancho Cucamonga. We do this by providing programs and services that support the needs of the Jewish community and act as the Jewish voice on issues that affect the greater Jewish community.

It is in this capacity that I
am writing you today to share with you that the Jewish
community is on edge.

Our country has witnessed an unprecedented spike in antisemitic incidents and attacks over the last several years. In its Audit of Antisemitism Incidents 2021, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) recorded 2,717 incidents of assault, harassment, and vandalism. The ADL also recently reported that widespread belief in antisemitic conspiracy theories and tropes nearly doubled since 2019 and the highest levels in 30 years. In November 2022, FBI Director Christopher Wray stated, "A full 63% of religious hate crimes are motivated by antisemitism—targeting a group that makes up just 2.4% of our population. Foreign terrorist organizations like ISIS have promoted antisemitic violent extremism for decades.

They continue to target Jewish Americans in their attack plots. But we also confront the threat of people here, on our soil, whose hateful views—often paraded online—boil over into acts of violence."
Locally, over the last year, driveways throughout our community have been strewn with hate-laden flyers, blaming Jews for everything from COVID, "how every aspect of Disney grooming," "Trump's Campaign Funding," and linking Jews to the pornography industry.

And the number of antisemitic verbal attacks and confrontations Jewish students are having in local schools has also dramatically increased. As a result of these incidents and others, along with the pervasiveness of antisemitism online, the Jewish community feels like we are being hit from all sides. The very essence of our right to live as Jews is under attack.

In December 2022, I wrote the enclosed Op-ed expressing the local Jewish community's concern about this latest rise of antisemitism and its impact on people's mental health and well-being.

Serving the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys
114A W. Lime Avenue I Monrovia, CA 91016 |
626.445.0810 |
Fax 626.445.5977
[email protected] www.jewishsgpv.org
126 of 446
Antisemitism has emerged at all levels of our society and must be confronted through a multifaceted, targeted approach, including at the City, County, State, and Federal government levels.

As the mayor of Glendale, we need your and Glendale City Council's help, and I am asking you to
commit to this effort by taking the following steps:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. Join over 700+ Mayors nationwide and sign the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and US Conference of Mayors statement to combat antisemitism.

Glendale City Council adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition on antisemitism
Propose, approve, and adopt a resolution denouncing and condemning antisemitism and all forms of hatred (including the jew-hatred flyers thrown on driveways) Appoint a City of Glendale staff member to create and convene a task force made up of
representatives from various ethnic and racial groups to work with the city to:
o Foster relationships between the groups
o Develop a
Zero-tolerance policy against all forms of hatred.
o Develop an educational plan to train Glendale's staff and law enforcement personnel on detecting and reacting to all forms of hatred.

Allocate resources for initiatives fostering interfaith acceptance, understanding, and harmony.

As an elected official, you are in an important and unique position to affect change through your direct engagement with our local Jewish community.

Now, I know that if the City of Glendale takes each of these steps, there is no guarantee that antisemitism or hatred will be immediately eradicated. However, I do know that if you do nothing, things will continue to get worse.

I urge you to stand with us, and let's show people that antisemitism and all forms of hatred will not be tolerated or accepted in Glendale.

Resp tively,
on Moss, MSW, MAJCS
xecutive Director
cc: Daniel Brotman, Councilmember
Paula Devine, Councilmember
Ara Najarian, Councilmember
Elen Asatryan, Councilmember
Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Serving the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys
114A W. Lime Avenue I Monrovia, CA 91016 |
626.445.0810 |
Fax 626.445.5977
[email protected] www.jewishsgpv.org
127 of 446
9a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Approval of the Final Engineer’s Report and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Annual Assessments for the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

1. Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the City of Glendale’s North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

2. Resolution Ordering the Levy and Collection of the City of Glendale’s North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District (“District”) was formed on January 9, 2007 pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15, of the California Streets and Highway Code. There are five Zones within the boundaries of the District and they receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements and services to be provided. On June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted resolutions to initiate proceeding and declare its intention to continue the levy in FY 2023-

24. This report includes resolutions to approve the final Engineer’s Report for the Fiscal Year 2023-24 (“Engineer’s Report”) and a resolution ordering the levy. The levy currently funds landscaping maintenance and irrigation, mechanical weeding services and pest control, litter abatement and tree maintenance.
128 of 446
2 a 9

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Economic Development: Continuation of maintenance services for the special benefits in the District are consistent with the economic development City Council priority.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the City of Glendale’s North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and Resolution Ordering the Levy and Collection of the City of Glendale’s North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

BACKGROUND
The North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District (“District”) was formed on January 9, 2007 pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15, of the California Streets and Highway Code. The District includes the parcels of land bounded by Linden Avenue to the North, San Fernando Road to the East (including properties on the east side of San Fernando Road), Fairmont Avenue and State Route 134 to the South and Interstate 5 to the West.

There are five Zones within the boundaries of the District and they receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements and services to be provided. Under the 1972 Act, the District is authorized to fund, service and/or maintain the following improvements:
• Lawn/ground cover, shrub, and tree care including weeding, pruning and feeding; • Hardscape maintenance including sweeping/cleaning and debris collection; • Water costs including water usage and irrigation maintenance and repair; and • Maintenance costs for site amenities that may include but are not limited to benches, trash receptacles and lighting.

On June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted resolutions that initiated proceedings, preliminarily approved the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Engineer’s Report, declared its intention to levy and collect assessments and charges, and appointed a time and place to hear objections to the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

The Engineer’s Report defines the boundaries of the District, describes the benefits, identifies the costs associated with these improvements, and lists the parcels and owner of record with the amount of the assessment. It also provides an annual update of the District including proposed expenses and revenues, including the proposed assessments to be levied on the Los Angeles County tax roll for Fiscal Year 2023-24. In addition, the Engineer’s Report contains a budget for which all parcels within the District will be assessed based on their geographical proximity to the various improvement projects in the area. The five Zones within the District were created to account for varying levels of landscape improvements; including amount, type, and frequency of maintenance. For example, Zone 1 (east and west side of San Fernando Road) has different amounts and types of public landscaping than Zone 4 which includes the GC3 campus. 129 of 446
3 a 9
To establish the annual assessment amount for each parcel within each of the five Zones, the assessment rate for each Zone is calculated by dividing the net cost budgeted for that zone (“Balance to Levy”) by the Total EBU (assessed acreage) for all benefitting properties within each respective Zone. This Assessment Rate is then applied back to each parcel’s assigned EBU (individual acreage) to determine the parcel’s proportionate benefit and assessment obligation for the improvements.

The following formulas are used to calculate each parcel’s Levy Amount (proportional assessment obligation) for each Zone.

Total Balance to Levy (Zone Budget)/Total EBU (Acres) = Assessment Rate per EBU Assessment Rate per EBU x Parcel’s EBU = Parcel Assessment The Engineer’s Report includes Fiscal Year 2023-24 assessments as well as an estimate for the assessment at full build-out. The established rates are for the following Zones for Fiscal Year 2023-24:

Fiscal Year 2023-24 Levy/EBU
• Zone 1: $826.92
• Zone 2: $82.69
• Zone 3: $82.80
• Zone 4: $128.22
• Zone 5: $241.88

ANALYSIS
The North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District is an assessment district. The proportional assessment calculated for each parcel will be applied to the Los Angeles County Tax Rolls for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The total assessment for Fiscal Year 2023-24 is $70,000 (Exhibit A, Engineer’s Report) which is slightly less than last year. The funds collected from property owners will be used mainly for landscaping, irrigation, debris collection and maintenance of zones in the San Fernando Road Corridor Project Area. These services are provided by multiple contractors working in this area on a regular basis including West Coast Arborists, Inc. for tree maintenance; Parkwood Landscape Maintenance, Inc. for landscape maintenance services and litter control and Pest Options, Inc. for weed control services.

Long-term, staff is looking at potentially using these funds to replace landscaping in some areas in the district and to refurbish the street furniture on San Fernando Road.

Over the past year, funds collected from this levy has been used to plant 15 trees, prune 52 trees and remove eight trees in the district. All 797 City-owned trees in the district are pruned every five to six years with the next pruning cycle scheduled to take place in FY 2023-24. Approximately 5,200 tree waterings took place in the past year which were all funded by this levy. Last year the levy also funded approximately ten hours per month of targeted weed control visits. Additionally, it funded monthly litter collection, shrub vine 130 of 446
4 a 9
and tree maintenance, ground cover maintenance and irrigation system maintenance for public landscaped areas on San Fernando Road, Flower Street, Fairmont Avenue and the Fairmont Bridge.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
This staff report includes a public hearing. The public hearing affords property owners in the district to object to continuation of the levy as well as other interested parties to express their views on the landscape maintenance district.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subject to CEQA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the attached resolutions continuing the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District levy into Fiscal Year 2023-24.

Alternative 2: Deny the attached resolutions terminating the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District Levy.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Petra Beglarian, Management Analyst
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: City of Glendale Annual Engineer’s Report: North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District- 2023-24 Engineer’s Annual Levy Report. 131 of 446
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE CITY OF
GLENDALE’S NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (commencing with Section 22500) Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and provisions of the City of Glendale Municipal Code (hereinafter referred to as the “Municipal Code”) did by previous Resolution, order the preparation of the fiscal year 2023/2024 Engineer’s Report for the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District (hereinafter referred as the “District”), and WHEREAS, said Engineer’s Report was filed with the City Clerk and based on this Report the City Council did by Resolution, on June 13, 2023, declared its intention to levy and collect assessments and charges against lots and parcels of land within the Districts for the fiscal year 2023/2024, to pay the maintenance, servicing and operation of the improvements related thereto, and
WHEREAS, this City Council has examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and hereby finds that the assessments and charges have been spread proportionately in accordance with the special benefit each property receives from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report or as modified by Council action and incorporated herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The Engineer’s Report as presented is hereby approved pursuant to Section 22623 of the Act and provisions of the Municipal Code, and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

SECTION 3. Copies of this resolution shall be filed in the offices of the City Manager, Finance Director and Public Works Engineering Departments.

SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this resolution.

ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 11th day of July 2023.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
132 of 446

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____ was duly adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ______ day of ______________________, 2023 and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
133 of 446
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN

THE NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2023, the City Council of the City of Glendale initiated proceedings and declared its intention to levy and collect assessments against lots and parcels of land within the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District (hereinafter referred to as the “District”) for fiscal year 2023/2024, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and WHEREAS, the designated Assessment Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Glendale and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council the Engineer’s Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Report”) in connection with the proposed levy and collection of special benefit assessments upon eligible parcels of land within the District, and the City Council did by previous Resolution approve such Report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to levy and collect assessments against parcels of land within the District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, to pay the costs and expenses for the maintenance, servicing and operation of landscape maintenance within street medians and parkways located within the District; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Following notice duly given, the City Council has held a full and fair Public Hearing regarding its Resolution approving or amending the Report prepared in connection herewith; the levy and collection of assessments, and considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons.

SECTION 3. Based upon its review (and amendments, as applicable) of the Report, a copy of which has been presented to the City Council and which has been filed with the City Clerk, the City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a) The land within the District will receive special benefit by the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities within the boundaries of the District.
b) The District includes all of the land receiving such benefit. c) The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within the District has been apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among the eligible parcels in proportion to the special benefit to be received by each parcel from the improvements and services for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024.
134 of 446
d) The proposed special benefit assessment calculated and apportioned for fiscal year 2023/2024 are consistent with the previously adopted Rate and Method and constitute a continuation of assessments existing on the effective date of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution. That the assessments are imposed exclusively to finance the maintenance, operation and servicing expenses for streets and that the assessments are exempt from the requirements of Article XIIID.

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made, which improvements are briefly described as the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements including ground cover, shrubs, trees or other vegetation; irrigation and drainage systems associated with the landscaping; various hardscapes and amenities including sidewalks, pathways, decorative curbing or ground cover, retaining walls, monuments, water features, trash receptacles, benches, and ornamental lighting that are located within the public right-of-ways or dedicated easements, and all appurtenant facilities related thereto or that may be authorized pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

SECTION 5. The County Auditor of Los Angeles County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each parcel of land the amount of levy, and such levies shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the levy shall be paid to the City Treasurer and placed in a fund for the District.

SECTION 6. The City Treasurer shall deposit all money representing assessments collected by the County for the District to the credit of a fund for the City of Glendale North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District, and such money shall be expended only for the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements as described in the Report.

SECTION 7. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the District annual levy for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024.

SECTION 8. The Assessment Engineer selected by the City Council is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of this Resolution and the assessments with the County Auditor of the County of Los Angeles no later than August 10, 2023.

SECTION 9. Copies of this resolution shall be filed in the offices of the City Manager, Finance Director and Public Works Engineering Departments.

SECTION 10. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this resolution.

ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 11th day of July, 2023.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
135 of 446

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
136 of 446
JUNE 1 3 , 202 3

CITY OF GLENDALE

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
202 3 /202 4 ENGINEER'S REPORT
Prepared For:

City of Glendale
633 East Broadway #209
Glendale, CA 91206
818.548.3900
Prepared By:

Cooperative Strategies
2855 Michelle Drive, Suite 230
Irvine, CA 92606
844.654.2421
Exhibit 1
137 of 446

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
I. ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT ..................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 3 III. IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .................... 4 A. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ............................................. 4 B. AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS .................................... 5 C. IMPROVEMENT PLANS ............................................... 7 IV. BENEFIT ANALYSIS ..................................................... 11 A. SPECIAL BENEFITS .................................................. 12 B. ZONES OF BENEFIT ................................................. 13 C. GENERAL BENEFIT .................................................. 16 V . METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...................................... 18 A. ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGY ............................... 18 B. ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION ............................. 20 C. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA ................................ . 21 D. ANNUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT .................... 21 VI. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ................................................. 22 VII. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ............................................... 2 3 VIII. ASSESSMENT ROLL ..................................................... 2 5

EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A:
2023/2024 Assessment Calculation
EXHIBIT B :
2023/2024 Assessment Roll
138 of 446
SECTION I – ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 1 ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2023, the City Council ("Council") of the City of Glendale ("City"), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways Code, et seq. ("1972 Act"), adopted Resolution 23-71 ("Resolution") initiating proceedings for the levy for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 assessments within the assessment district referred to as the "North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District" ("District") to pay for the construction, installation, maintenance, and service of improvements ("Improvements") more particularly described in the Resolution; and WHEREAS, Cooperative Strategies has been designated as the (“Assessment Engineer”) and the Resolution directed the Assessment Engineer to prepare and file a report (the "Engineer’s Report") pursuant to Section 22565, et seq., of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution ("Proposition 218"); and
WHEREAS, the 1972 Act and Proposition 218 require that the Engineer's Report shall contain the following:
a. Plans and specifications for the Improvements
b. An estimate of the costs of the Improvements
c. A diagram of the Assessment District
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the Improvements e. If bonds or notes will be issued pursuant to Section 22662.5 of the Streets and Highways Code, an estimate of their principal amount;
NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned, acting as an agent for Cooperative Strategies, Assessment Engineer for the Assessment District, by virtue of the power vested in me under the 1972 Act and the order of the Board, hereby submits this Engineer's Report and makes the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated costs of the Improvements, including the incidental costs and expenses, to be paid by each Benefit Zone (defined below) of the District.
139 of 446
SECTION I - ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT JUNE 13, 2023
I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within the Assessment District by apportioning the amount allocable to each Benefit Zone among t he several lots or parcels of each such Benefit Zone in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel of each such Benefit Zone from the Improvements, as more particularly set forth in the l ist attached under separate cover (the "Assessment Roll") and by this reference made a part of this Engineer's Report. The assessme nt diagram appearing herein is a representation of the assessment diagram to be approved by resolut ion by the Cit y Council for t he City of Glendale. Reference is hereby made t o the Assesso r' s Maps of the County of Los Angeles for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 for a more particular description of the property. Each parcel of lar.1d assessed is d escribed on the Asses sment Roll by referen ce to its parcel number as shown on the Los Angeles County Assessment Roll.
,~ti!~
Stephen A. Runk, P.E.

License Number: C234 73

CITY OF GLEN DALE

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRI DOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 140 of 446
SECTION II - INTRODUCTION JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 3

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City, this Engineer’s Report for the District is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the 1972 Act.

At a Public Hearing held on January 9, 2007, a majority of the affected property owners that will receive a special benefit from the improvements and maintenance for which the assessment was proposed approved the formation of the District in accordance with the notice, hearing and balloting provisions of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. Section 2 of the California Constitution defines "assessment" as any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. Assessments are sometimes referred to as “special assessments” or "special benefit assessments."
The Report quantifies the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel subject to the proposed assessment in relation to the aggregate capital cost of the public improvements and maintenance being provided, and calculates the amount of the assessment to be imposed on each identified parcel. The assessment approved by the property owners established an initial maximum assessment rate for each zone and included the assessment range calculation currently applied to all District zones. There is a fixed annual inflationary adjustment to the maximum assessment rates per each parcel's proportional benefit ("Equivalent Benefit Units" or "EBUs") of three percent (3%). The maximum assessment rates established for the previous fiscal year are recalculated to establish the new maximum assessment rates that may be levied for that fiscal year. Contained in the Report is a budget for which all parcels within the District will be assessed based on their geographical proximity to the various improvement projects planned for the area. The five (5) zones within the District were created to account for varying levels of landscape improvements; including amount, type, and frequency of maintenance.

The Report also provides an annual update of the District including the proposed expenses and revenues, any substantial change in the existing improvements or the District, and the proposed assessments to be levied on the Los Angeles County ("County") tax roll for Fiscal Year 2023/2024. The District and the zones therein have been established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the City Council annually conducts a public hearing to accept property owner and public comments and testimony, to review the Report and approve the annual assessments to be levied on the county tax roll for that fiscal year. All assessments approved by the City Council have been prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution.
141 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 4

IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS
As applicable or may be applicable to this District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment.
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices.
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments. • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services. • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements.
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.
142 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 5 The 1972 Act defines "maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

B . DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The District is located within the City of Glendale and generally includes the parcels of land bounded by Linden Avenue to the north, San Fernando Road to the East (including properties on the east side of San Fernando Road), Fairmont Avenue and Highway 134 ("SR134") to the south, and Interstate 5 to the west. An Assessment Diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, and is hereby made a part of this Report by reference. All lots or parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on the county assessor's maps on file in the Los Angeles County Assessor's office. Said assessor's maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of such lots or parcels.

It has been determined that the parcels of land within the five (5) definable zones described below will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements and services to be provided. The parcels comprising each zone will receive a special benefit that affects the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from its effect on other parcels and the public at large. The five zones within the District are generally described as follows:

ZONE 1
Zone 1 generally incorporates and includes those parcels within the District that are located along San Fernando Road between East Linden Avenue and Fairmont Avenue/Ventura Freeway (SR134), which have parcel frontage along San Fernando Road or may be part of an overall development (group of parcels) that San Fernando Road is considered a primary access point to the property.
143 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 6 ZONE 2
Zone 2 incorporates and includes those parcels within the District that are generally located between Allen Avenue and Cleveland Road that are south and west of Zone 1 (parcels along San Fernando Road), but are north and east of the MetroLink right-of-way (including the right-of-way properties).

This Zone includes, but is not limited to, parcels that have frontage or may be adjacent to Standard Avenue and Hale Avenue, as well as portions of Allen Avenue, Thompson Avenue, and Western Avenue (including parcel 5627-002-011 which is a flag lot located on Western Avenue, but has a small access point to San Fernando Road).

ZONE 3
Zone 3 incorporates and includes those parcels within the District that are generally located west and south of the MetroLink right-of-way, north and west of Western Avenue, east and north of the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5), and south and east of Allen Avenue. This Zone includes, but is not limited to, parcels that have frontage or may be adjacent to North Cosmic Way, Dana Street, Irving Avenue, and Raymond Avenue, as well as portions of Allen Avenue, Thompson Avenue, Flower Street (north of Western Avenue) and Western Avenue (north side of the street).

ZONE 4
Zone 4 is considered the heart of the Grand Central Creative Center that incorporates and includes those parcels within the District that are generally located west and south of the MetroLink right-of-ways, east and north of the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5), south and east of Western Avenue and north and west of the Golden State Freeway/Ventura Freeway interchange or that portion of Flower Street that provides east/west traffic flow. This Zone includes, but is not limited to, parcels that have frontage or may be adjacent to south Cosmic Way, Justin Avenue, Maurine Avenue, Ruberta Avenue, Sonora Avenue, Grand Central Avenue, Grandview Avenue, Circle Seven Drive, Davis Avenue, Hazel Street, Paula Avenue, as well as portions of Air Way, Flower Street and Western Avenue.
144 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 7 ZONE 5
Zone 5 incorporates and includes those parcels within the District that are not included as part of Zones 1, 2, 3 or 4, and are generally located south and west of San Fernando Road and the MetroLink right-of-ways, south and east of Flower Street (that potion that provides east/west traffic flow), and north of the Ventura Freeway. This Zone includes, but is not limited to, parcels with frontage or access from a portion of Flower Street (east/west), Air Way or Bekins Way.

C. IMPROVEMENT PLANS
The purpose of this District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscape improvements and amenities within the area known as the North San Fernando Road Corridor which includes landscape improvements associated with the Grand Central Creative Campus Master Plan ("GC3 Disney Project") and the San Fernando Road Streetscape Project. While portions of the San Fernando Road Streetscape Project have already been completed in conjunction with the San Fernando Road Rehabilitation Project, additional landscape improvements along San Fernando Road are proposed, and the construction of the Grand Central Creative Campus provides a landscaped urban environment and park-like setting that enhances the desirability and economic opportunities for properties in close proximity to the improvements.

The District provides the necessary funding source for the annual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements that have been constructed and installed for the benefit of properties within the District.

These improvements may include, but are not limited to various plant materials including turf, ground cover, shrubs, trees or other vegetation; irrigation and drainage systems associated with the landscaping; various hardscapes and amenities including sidewalks, pathways, decorative curbing or ground cover, retaining walls, monuments, water features, trash receptacles, benches, and ornamental lighting that are located within the public right-of-ways or dedicated easements within the District.

The maintenance of these improvements generally include, but are not limited to all annual costs for materials, equipment, labor and incidental expenses including administrative expenses as well as the performance of occasional or periodic repair and maintenance activities such as irrigation repairs, plant replacement, tree trimming, rehabilitation or replacement of various hardscape amenities.
145 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 8 The proposed improvements to be maintained and funded in whole or in part through the District assessments generally include, but are not limited to:

Parkway landscaping along Flower Street
• Approximately 14,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the north and south side from Raymond Street to Sonora Avenue.
• Approximately 40,500 square feet of parkway landscaping on the north and south side from Sonora Avenue to Flower Street extension. • Approximately 12,500 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side to Air Way.

Parkway landscaping along Air Way
• Approximately 40,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the north and south side from Sonora Avenue to Grandview Avenue.
• Approximately 20,500 square feet of parkway landscaping on the north and south side from Grandview Avenue to Flower Street.

Tree wells and Parkway landscaping along San Fernando Road • Tree wells on the north and south side from Linden Avenue to SR-134. • Approximately 2,000 square feet of median landscaping. • Approximately 3,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the north and south side from Fairmont Avenue to Doran Street.

Parkway landscaping along Western Avenue
• Approximately 7,500 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side, South of Air Way.
• Approximately 2,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side, South of Flower Street.
146 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 9 Parkway landscaping along SR-134
• Approximately 23,000 square feet of parkway landscaping North and South of Flower Extension.
• Approximately 4,100 square feet of parkway landscaping along the east and west side of Fairmont Bridge, South of San Fernando Road. • Approximately 2,000 square feet of parkway landscaping along the east side of Fairmont, North and South of San Fernando Road to SR-134 ramps.

Parkway landscaping along Sonora Avenue
• Approximately 13,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side, from Victory Blvd. to Flower Street.
• Approximately 11,500 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side, from Flower Street to Air Way.

Parkway landscaping along Grandview Avenue
• Approximately 13,500 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side, from Flower Street to Air Way.

Parkway landscaping along Paula Avenue
• Approximately 10,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the east and west side, South of Flower Street to Interstate 5.

Parkway landscaping along Truitt Street
• Approximately 2,000 square feet of parkway landscaping on the north side, from Davis Avenue to Paula Avenue.

Parkway landscaping adjacent to power plant
Entry signs, monuments, signage, ornamental structures, and other related facilities
All appurtenant facilities, equipment, materials and utilities related to the aforementioned improvements
147 of 446
SECTION III – IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 10 Detailed maps and descriptions of the location and extent of the proposed improvements to be maintained by the District are contained in various documents including the San Fernando Road Streetscape Project Plans and the GC3 Disney Project that are on file in the Office of Economic Development of the City and by reference are made part of this Report and the improvements as described herein.
148 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 11

BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The establishment of an assessment district under the 1972 Act permits a city to provide certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of various improvements including street lighting, landscaping, parks and recreational facilities, and appurtenant amenities. The costs of these improvements are levied according to a benefit assessment which is based on the concept of assessing only those properties that benefit from the improvements and services provided by the assessment district.

The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits each receives from the improvements. The California Constitution states that an agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed.

The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement or the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement or for the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

In identifying and determining the proportional special benefit to various properties within the District it was necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. While the full extent of the improvements provided by this District may be modified as development of properties within the District progresses, generally, the improvements that are contained and detailed in two overall project plans that are identified as the San Fernando Road Rehabilitation Project (specifically the San Fernando Road Streetscape Project), and the GC3 Disney Project (hereafter referred to collectively as "Project Areas" or individually as "Project Area"). Each of these Project Areas identifies various landscape improvements and amenities that will be incorporated into the District for ongoing maintenance, the most extensive of which is outlined in the Grand Central Creative Campus Master Plan. Together, these Project Areas creates a destination point, traffic circulation and area of activity to promote business opportunities, enhance the overall urban environment and the aesthetic appeal of the area known as the North San Fernando Road Corridor. 149 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 12 A. SPECIAL BENEFITS
As a general matter, an assessment represents the entirety of the cost of the improvements and services allocated to individual properties within an assessment district. This proportionality requirement ensures that the aggregate assessment imposed on all parcels is distributed among all assessed parcels in proportion to the special benefits conferred on each parcel.

With the exception of a few isolated parcels that are currently identified as single-family residential properties, and the parcels that comprise the MetroLink right-of-way, the properties within the District boundaries and originally identified in the Project Areas are generally zoned for nonresidential (commercial/ industrial) use or in some cases mixed use (combined residential/commercial use). By creating a destination point and area of activity through construction and installation of landscape improvements and associated amenities in the Project Areas, the City hopes to enhance and revitalize the business environment in the North San Fernando Road Corridor by establishing an attractive entertainment business center that encourages and stimulates business opportunities and commercial growth for the area that will in turn provide direct and special benefits to properties within the District. The special benefits properties within the District will receive from the proposed improvements include, but are not limited to:
• Improved aesthetic appeal of nearby properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced business opportunities and commercial growth that is facilitated by a well -maintained area and an overall development plan that not only attracts customers and increases overall foot traffic, but aides in retaining customers in the area.
• Enhanced adaptation of adequate green space, trees, and amenities within the urban environment.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of properties within the District resulting from their association with well-maintained improvements. • Enhanced quality of life and working environment within the area that is promoted by well-maintained landscaped areas and amenities. • Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities within public areas.
150 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 13 • Increased social opportunities and leisure activities for customers, residents and families, provided by a well-maintained neighborhood destination place for relaxation, socializing, and entertainment that is within easy walking distance.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.

The preceding special benefits contribute to the overall aesthetic value and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District and thereby provide a special enhancement to these properties. Furthermore, it has been determined that the lack of funding to properly service and maintain the improvements would ultimately result in the deterioration of the improvements and facilities, which in turn could negatively impact the properties within the District. As such, the annual costs of ensuring the ongoing maintenance and operation of these improvements are considered a distinct and special benefit to the properties within the District and are therefore considered the financial obligation of those properties. The cost of any improvement or portion thereof that is considered to be of general benefit shall not be included as part of the special benefit assessments allocated to properties within the District.

B . ZONES OF BENEFIT
Improvements that provide a special benefit to an isolated group of parcels of land located within the District are considered to be a localized benefit, and the costs associated with these improvements are assessed to all applicable parcels receiving the localized benefit. The proposed improvements and maintenance provide a distinct and special benefit to all the non-exempt properties within the District and the proportional costs and expenses associated with each improvement is not mutually exclusive or isolated to a particular parcel or group of parcels. Because the location and extent of the various improvements in relationship to parcels immediately adjacent or in close proximity to specific improvements must also be considered, five (5) definable areas with differing degrees of localized benefit were formed within the District was formed to reflect the proportional special benefits that various areas of the District receive from the specific improvements planned for the District. A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the five zones therein is attached and incorporated herein under "Section VI. 151 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 14 Assessment Diagram" of this Report. These five zones and the improvements that are generally located within those zones are outlined in the following:

Zone 1
Zone 1 includes parcels that are located along San Fernando Road between East Linden Avenue and Fairmont Avenue/Ventura Freeway (Highway 134), which have parcel frontage along San Fernando Road or may be part of an overall development (group of parcels) that San Fernando Road is considered a primary access point to the development. The improvements specifically associated with Zone 1 (within or directly adjacent to the Zone) include:
• The maintenance/rehabilitation of existing street trees (tree wells) that line San Fernando Road.
• Parkway and median landscaping along San Fernando Road. • Future improvements planned for San Fernando Road that may include, but is not limited to benches, trash containers and other amenities to accommodate pedestrian traffic in the area.

Zone 2
Zone 2 includes parcels that are located between Allen Avenue and Cleveland Road that are south and west of Zone 1 (parcels along San Fernando Road), but are north and east of the MetroLink right-of-way (including the right-of-way properties). The improvements planned for Zone 2 include less extensive landscaping than that found in Zone 1.

The improvements specifically associated with Zone 2 (within or directly adjacent to the Zone) include:
• Landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Sonora Avenue.
• Landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Western Avenue.
152 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 15 Zone 3
Zone 3 includes parcels that are located west and south of the MetroLink right of-way, north and west of Western Avenue, east and north of the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5), and south and east of Allen Avenue. Zone 3 properties are adjacent to the Grand Central Creative Campus (considered the hub of the District) and the improvements directly associated with Zone 3 and are similar to those of Zone 2. The improvements specifically associated with Zone 3 (within or directly adjacent to the Zone) include:
• Landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Western Avenue.
• Landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Flower Street.
• Landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Air Way.

Zone 4
Zone 4 is considered the heart of the proposed Grand Central Creative Center that includes parcels within the District that are located west and south of the MetroLink right-of-ways, east and north of the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5), south and east of Western Avenue and north and west of the Golden State Freeway/Ventura Freeway interchange or that portion of Flower Street that provides east/west traffic flow. These properties generally comprise the Grand Central Creative Campus that includes a mix of media and entertainment office uses. The improvements specifically associated with Zone 4 (within or directly adjacent to the Zone) include:
• Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Sonora Avenue.
• Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Grandview Avenue.
• Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Paula Avenue.
• Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Truitt Street.
153 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 16 • Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation adjacent to power plant.
• Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Western Avenue.
• Parkway landscaping and tree maintenance/rehabilitation along Air Way.
• Parkway and median landscaping, tree maintenance
/rehabilitation, and irrigation along Flower Street.

Zone 5
Zone 5 incorporates and includes parcels within the District that are not included as part of Zones 1, 2, 3 or 4, and are generally located south and west of San Fernando Road and the MetroLink right-of-ways, south and east of Flower Street (that potion that provides east/west traffic flow), and north of the Ventura Freeway. The properties within Zone 5 reside along an area that functions as a corridor into the District as opposed to a focal point of the District. These properties have a significantly different relationship to the improvements than other properties within the District and therefore have been established as a separate Zone. The improvements specifically associated with Zone 5 (within or directly adjacent to the Zone) include:
• Parkway landscaping and irrigation along SR-134.
• Parkway and median landscaping, tree maintenance/
rehabilitation, and irrigation along Flower Street.

C. GENERAL BENEFIT
Only special benefits are assessable, and local governments may not impose assessments to pay for the cost of providing a general benefit to the community. If a proposed project provides both special benefits and general benefits, the assessment engineer’s report must separate the benefits, and only the special benefits may be assessed. The fact that a benefit is conferred throughout a district does not make it general rather than special. 154 of 446
SECTION IV – BENEFIT ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 17 In that circumstance, the characterization of a benefit may depend on whether the parcel receives a direct advantage from the improvement through its direct proximity the improvement or receives an indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement.

In reviewing the overall improvements plans described and outlined in the Project Areas, there are proposed landscaped areas included in these plans that are outside the defined boundaries of the District. These particular improvement areas include minor landscape amenities that provide entryway corridors to the District along SR134 and Fairmont Avenue, as well as the District's two entryways from Victory Boulevard, namely Sonora Avenue and Western Avenue. It was determined that all of the costs associated with these off-site landscaped improvements are considered a General Benefit. The cost of maintaining these improvements are budgeted independently in the overall District budget as "General Benefit" costs and are not included as part of the budgets and assessments for properties within the District. These improvements and associated incidental expenses will be funded through other revenue sources available to the City.
155 of 446
SECTION V – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 18

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Based on the provisions of the 1972 Act and the California Constitution, the following sections summarize an analysis of the special benefits properties receive from the improvements and services provided; the basis upon which the District's boundaries and zones were established, identification of overall variances in special benefit from the improvements; the formulas used to calculate each parcel's proportional special benefit assessment based on the entirety of the cost to provide the improvements and the parcels receiving such special benefit; and the establishment of an Assessment Range Formula to address anticipated cost increases due to inflation.

A. ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGY

1. Equivalent Benefit Units
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each parcel from the improvements. The California Constitution however prohibits benefit assessments from being based on the value of property. Instead, a district establishes a benefit formula and each parcel in a localized benefit zone is assessed according to the benefit it receives from the services and improvements.

Although the size of a parcel does not provide a direct correlation to the actual use of the property, it does provide a relative comparison to its potential use as compared to other properties. Likewise, the size of a parcel when compared to surrounding properties provides a reasonable and proportional relationship to its use, access and nexus (relative frontage) to the major streets within the area where the improvements exist. Therefore, it was determined that for this District, each parcel's proportional benefit (EBU) shall be equal to the parcel's assigned acreage (rounded to two decimal places).

2. Exempt Parcels
Properties that are not assessed for District improvements may include but are not limited to:
156 of 446
SECTION V – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 19 • Lots or parcels identified as public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County).
• Dedicated public utility or transportation easements and rightof-ways including, but not limited to railroad properties, drainage facilities, properties owned by utility companies and used to supply various public utilities including water, gas, telephone and electricity.
• Dedicated public easements including open space areas, rightof-ways, parkways, parks or other publicly owned properties that are part of the District improvements or may provide similar services or benefits to private properties within the District.

3. Allocation of Improvement Costs
In reviewing the overall improvements planned for this District, it was apparent that there are variations in the nature, type and extent of the various improvements that will be constructed throughout the District that facilitated the establishment of the five zones previously identified. However, it is also apparent that in their entirety, the improvements were designed to create an urban environment that will attract customers, enhance traffic flow and promote business and commercial opportunities throughout the District. In fact, many of the landscape improvements are adjacent to and associated with, properties within more than one zone (Portions of Western Avenue and Flower Street being examples of areas where more than one zone is directly associated with the same improvements). In addition, several of the District's improvements including most median islands will be constructed and implemented to facilitate traffic circulation into and within the District. These traffic circulation enhancements and the improvements associated with them will promote business activity and the benefit to all assessed parcels within the District.

Based collectively on the preceding discussion and findings, it was determined that 20 percent (20%) of the cost to maintain all District improvements (District's Total Direct Costs) shall be allocated as a district-wide special benefit ("District-wide Direct Costs"). 157 of 446
SECTION V – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 20 As such, 20 percent of the costs associated with maintaining each improvement budgeted for the Fiscal Year (Direct Costs) will be allocated proportionately to each zone based on the total number of EBU's associated with parcels in that zone as a percentage of the District's Total EBU's. (Each parcel therefore shares proportionately in these costs based on their assigned EBU). The remaining maintenance costs associated with the various improvements (80 percent) is allocated to the respective zone or zones that are directly associated with those improvements ("Zone-specific Direct Costs"). Specific improvements that are directly affiliated with more than a single Zone is allocated proportionately to parcels within each affected Zone based on their proportional EBU.

Together, the proportional District-wide Direct Costs calculated for each zone and the Zone-specific Direct Costs determined for each zone establishes the total Direct Costs budgeted for each zone of the District.

Incidental expenses including, but not limited to the City's administration and overhead expenses, professional services, county fees and funds to be collected as part of the District's operational reserve shall be allocated as district-wide expenses with each parcel proportionately sharing in those costs and expenses based on their assigned EBU.

Many of the planned improvements described in these documents will be phased in over time as part of various development agreements or related construction projects, and therefore the budget established for each zone to maintain the various District improvements each Fiscal Year will be reflective of only those improvements and services that need to be funded that Fiscal Year.

B. ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION
To establish the annual assessment amount for each parcel within each of the five zones, the assessment rate for each zone is calculated by dividing the net cost budgeted for that zone ("Balance to Levy") by the Total EBU (assessed acreage) of all benefiting properties within each respective zone. This Assessment Rate is then applied back to each parcel's assigned EBU (individual acreage) to determine the parcel's proportionate benefit and assessment obligation for the improvements. The following formulas are used to calculate each parcel's Levy Amount (proportional assessment obligation) for each zone.
158 of 446
SECTION V – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 21 Total Balance to Levy (Zone Budget)/ Total EBU (Acres) = Assessment Rate per EBU
Assessment Rate per EBU x Parcel's EBU =
Parcel Levy Amount
C. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
There is a fixed annual inflationary adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rates per EBU of three percent (3%). Beginning in Fiscal Year 2008/2009 and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment Rates established for the previous Fiscal Year shall be recalculated to establish the new Maximum Assessment Rates that may be levied for that Fiscal Year.

D. ANNUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT
Although the Maximum Assessment Rates increases each year, the actual assessment may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment Rate adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. If the budget and assessments calculated in any subsequent Fiscal Year requires an assessment rate greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the proposed assessments would be considered an increased assessment and would require approval of the affected property owners through a protest ballot proceeding before the incremental increase may be imposed. 159 of 446
SECTION VI – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 22

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The following page summarizes the 2023/2024 levy for Zones 1 through 5 to fund the District improvements based on the improvements to be maintained and the associated incidental expenses for Fiscal Year 2023/2024, resulting in the proportional assessments calculated for each parcel that will be applied to the County Tax Rolls for Fiscal Year 2023/2024. Please see Exhibit A for more detail on the 2023/2024 levy calculation.

TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF 202 3 /202 4 LEVY
Zone
Total
Parcels
Parcels
Levied
Total
EBUs
Levy
per EBU
Total
Levy
Zone 1 146 138 46.54 $826.82 $38,480.20
Zone 2 53 37 20.45 $82.69 $1,691.01
Zone 3 63 63 32.39 $82.80 $2,681.89
Zone 4 173 167 163.97 $128.22 $21,024.23
Zone 5 12 9 25.31 $241.88 $6,121.98
Total 447 414 288.66 N/A $69,999.32
160 of 446
SECTION VII – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 23

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram showing the boundaries of the District is shown on the following page. A full size copy of the Assessment Diagram is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Glendale and available for inspection and by reference is made part of this report. For details of the dimensions of the parcels within the District, reference is made to Los Angeles County Assessor's Maps that are on file in the office of the County Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. 161 of 446
Norton Ave
Zook Dr
Graynold Ave
Davis Ave
Zoo Dr
§¨¦5
¬«
Flower St
Air Wy
Sonora Ave
Allen Ave
Lake St
Irving Ave
Grand Central Ave
Fairfield St
Fairmont Ave
Thompson Ave
Paula Ave
Newby St
Davis Ave
Justin Ave
Hale St
Dana St
Grover Ave
Hazel St
Willard Ave
Raymond Ave
Pelanconi Ave
Dale Ave
Grange St
Rosedale Ave
Kellogg Ave
Circle Seven Dr
Truitt St
Standard Ave
Aristo St
E Linden Ave
Blossom St
Bekins Wy
Cleveland Rd
Justin Ave
Ruberta Ave
Thompson Ave
Winchester Ave
Western Ave
Raymond Ave
Ruberta Ave
Winchester Ave
Cosmic Wy
Flower St
Emens Wy
Ruberta Ave
Thompson Ave
Grandview Ave
Irving Ave
Lake St
Idlewood Rd
Zoo Dr
5 San Fernando Rd
W Glenoaks Blvd
Highland Ave
Western Ave
W Kenneth Rd
Grandview Ave
S Lake St
Victory Blvd
Lake St
6 W Doran St
W Alameda Ave
Riverside Dr
Fairmont Ave
Flower St

CITY OF GLENDALE

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 µ2
Miles
May 2022
Boundary of NSFRC LMD
Areas of General Benefit
NSFRC LMD Zones
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Other Parcels
City of Glendale Outside of NSFRC LMD
Outside of City of Glendale
162 of 446
SECTION VIII – ASSESSMENT ROLL JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE 25

ASSESSMENT ROLL
Exhibit B provides the list of the parcels and proposed Fiscal Year 2023/2024 assessment amounts for each of the parcels within the District as determined by the assessment rates and method of apportionment described herein.

S:\Clients\City of Glendale\Demographics\Landscape Maintenance District\SY2324\Reports\Working\EngineersReport_CityofGlendale_NSFRCLMD_2324_D1.docx 163 of 446
EXHIBIT A JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE B-1

EXHIBIT A
202 3 /202 4 ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
164 of 446
General Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone
Benefit 1 2 3 4 5
Parkway Maintenance $32,400 $6,480 $15,876 $0 $0 $4,860 $5,184 Median Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Tree Maintenance $40,000 $8,000 $23,139 $349 $557 $7,523 $432 Landscape Utilities (Water/Electricity) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Miscellaneous Materials & Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sub-Total Annual Maintenance $72,400 $14,480 $39,015 $349 $557 $12,383 $5,616 Parkway Rehabilitation/Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Median Rehabilitation/Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Tree Rehabilitation/Replacement $10,000 $2,000 $6,598 $116 $186 $956 $144 Sub-Total Long-Term Maintenance $10,000 $2,000 $6,598 $116 $186 $956 $144 Total Direct Cost $82,400 $16,480 $45,613 $465 $743 $13,339 $5,760 City Administration Overhead $5,000 $0 $806 $354 $561 $2,840 $438 Professional Fees for Admin $7,200 $0 $1,161 $510 $808 $4,090 $631 County Administration Fee $600 $0 $97 $43 $67 $341 $53
Miscellaneous Administration Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sub-Total Administration $12,800 $0 $2,064 $907 $1,436 $7,271 $1,122 Reserve Fund Collection/(Transfer) ($21,200) $0 ($11,209) ($566) ($897) ($6,674) ($1,854) Revenues from Other Sources (Contribution) ($4,000) $0 ($645) ($283) ($449) ($2,272) ($351) General Benefit Share $0 $0 $2,657 $1,168 $1,849 $9,361 $1,445 Sub-Total Levy Adjustments ($25,200) $0 ($9,197) $319 $503 $415 ($760) Total Incidentals/Adjustments ($12,400) $0 ($7,133) $1,226 $1,939 $7,686 $362 Balance to Levy $70,000 $0 $38,480 $1,691 $2,682 $21,025 $6,122 Total Parcels 447 N/A 146 53 63 173 12
Parcels Levied 414 N/A 138 37 63 167 9
Total EBU 288.66 N/A 46.54 20.45 32.39 163.97 25.31
Levy per EBU N/A $826.82 $82.69 $82.80 $128.22 $241.88
Maximum Levy per EBU 23/24 N/A N/A $1,119.74 $856.26 $1,234.07 $2,914.21 $1,467.86 Maximum Levy per EBU 22/23 N/A N/A $1,087.13 $831.32 $1,198.13 $2,829.33 $1,425.11 Estimated Beginning Fund Balance $265,874 $0 $42,866 $18,836 $29,833 $151,027 $23,312 Reserve Fund Collection/(Transfer) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance $265,874 $0 $42,866 $18,836 $29,833 $151,027 $23,312

CITY OF GLENDALE

NORTH SAN FERNADO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2023/2024 ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
Budget Item Total Cost
Parcel Summary
Fund Balance Information
Annual Maintenance Expenses
Long-Term Maintenanec Expenses (CIP)
Incidental Expenses/Adjustments
Administration
Levy Adjustments
Direct Costs

Page 1 of 1 ends

165 of 446
EXHIBIT B JUNE 13, 2023

CITY OF GLENDALE
NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PAGE B-1

EXHIBIT B
202 3 /202 4 ASSESSMENT ROLL
166 of 446
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
5593-003-906 5 13.29 $241.88 $1,467.86 $3,214.59
5593-003-909 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5593-003-910 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5593-003-911 5 0.13 $241.88 $1,467.86 $31.44
5623-021-030 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
5623-021-031 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5623-021-032 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5623-021-033 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5623-021-034 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-021-035 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-021-036 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5623-023-009 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
5623-023-012 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-023-015 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-023-016 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-023-017 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-023-018 1 0.09 $826.82 $1,119.74 $74.41
5623-023-028 1 0.06 $826.82 $1,119.74 $49.61
5623-023-029 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5623-025-036 1 0.27 $826.82 $1,119.74 $223.24
5623-025-037 1 0.18 $826.82 $1,119.74 $148.83
5623-025-038 1 0.09 $826.82 $1,119.74 $74.41
5623-025-043 1 0.50 $826.82 $1,119.74 $413.41
5623-026-004 1 0.26 $826.82 $1,119.74 $214.97
5623-026-066 1 0.24 $826.82 $1,119.74 $198.44
5623-026-072 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5623-026-073 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5623-026-074 1 0.25 $826.82 $1,119.74 $206.71
5623-027-037 1 0.25 $826.82 $1,119.74 $206.71
5623-027-902 1 0.25 $826.82 $1,119.74 $206.71
5623-027-903 1 0.51 $826.82 $1,119.74 $421.68
5623-029-001 1 0.21 $826.82 $1,119.74 $173.63
5623-029-002 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5623-029-003 1 0.46 $826.82 $1,119.74 $380.34
5623-029-020 1 0.22 $826.82 $1,119.74 $181.90
5623-029-021 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
5623-030-017 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
167 of 446 Page 1 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5623-030-022 1 0.42 $826.82 $1,119.74 $347.26
5623-030-023 1 0.37 $826.82 $1,119.74 $305.92
5623-033-001 1 0.73 $826.82 $1,119.74 $603.58
5623-034-008 1 0.10 $826.82 $1,119.74 $82.68
5623-034-009 1 0.07 $826.82 $1,119.74 $57.88
5623-034-010 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
5623-034-011 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
5623-034-012 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
5623-034-013 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
5623-037-010 1 0.21 $826.82 $1,119.74 $173.63
5623-037-018 1 0.45 $826.82 $1,119.74 $372.07
5623-038-022 1 0.57 $826.82 $1,119.74 $471.29
5623-040-027 1 0.30 $826.82 $1,119.74 $248.05
5623-040-028 1 1.30 $826.82 $1,119.74 $1,074.87
5623-040-031 1 3.65 $826.82 $1,119.74 $3,017.89
5623-040-032 1 1.33 $826.82 $1,119.74 $1,099.67
5623-040-900 1 1.57 $826.82 $1,119.74 $1,298.11
5624-005-028 1 0.33 $826.82 $1,119.74 $272.85
5624-008-001 1 0.27 $826.82 $1,119.74 $223.24
5624-008-002 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5624-008-003 1 0.07 $826.82 $1,119.74 $57.88
5624-008-004 1 0.07 $826.82 $1,119.74 $57.88
5624-008-023 1 0.34 $826.82 $1,119.74 $281.12
5624-009-011 1 0.22 $826.82 $1,119.74 $181.90
5624-009-020 1 0.50 $826.82 $1,119.74 $413.41
5624-012-030 1 0.36 $826.82 $1,119.74 $297.66
5624-012-035 1 0.04 $826.82 $1,119.74 $33.07
5624-012-036 1 0.33 $826.82 $1,119.74 $272.85
5624-013-007 1 0.08 $826.82 $1,119.74 $66.15
5624-013-008 1 0.08 $826.82 $1,119.74 $66.15
5624-013-011 1 0.15 $826.82 $1,119.74 $124.02
5624-013-016 1 0.15 $826.82 $1,119.74 $124.02
5624-013-017 1 0.08 $826.82 $1,119.74 $66.15
5624-013-019 1 0.31 $826.82 $1,119.74 $256.31
5624-013-020 1 0.15 $826.82 $1,119.74 $124.02
5624-013-021 1 0.22 $826.82 $1,119.74 $181.90
5624-013-022 1 0.31 $826.82 $1,119.74 $256.31
168 of 446 Page 2 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5624-013-023 1 0.08 $826.82 $1,119.74 $66.15
5624-013-024 1 0.15 $826.82 $1,119.74 $124.02
5624-013-025 1 0.34 $826.82 $1,119.74 $281.12
5624-014-002 2 0.26 $82.69 $856.26 $21.50
5624-014-003 2 0.13 $82.69 $856.26 $10.75
5624-014-004 2 0.13 $82.69 $856.26 $10.75
5624-014-011 2 0.26 $82.69 $856.26 $21.50
5624-014-013 2 0.12 $82.69 $856.26 $9.92
5624-014-017 2 0.18 $82.69 $856.26 $14.88
5624-014-018 2 0.17 $82.69 $856.26 $14.06
5624-014-019 2 0.17 $82.69 $856.26 $14.06
5624-014-020 2 0.17 $82.69 $856.26 $14.06
5624-014-021 2 0.13 $82.69 $856.26 $10.75
5624-015-001 2 0.03 $82.69 $856.26 $2.48
5624-015-002 2 0.04 $82.69 $856.26 $3.31
5624-015-003 2 0.04 $82.69 $856.26 $3.31
5624-015-004 2 0.04 $82.69 $856.26 $3.31
5624-015-005 2 0.12 $82.69 $856.26 $9.92
5624-015-006 2 0.88 $82.69 $856.26 $72.77
5624-015-028 2 0.58 $82.69 $856.26 $47.96
5624-015-029 2 0.50 $82.69 $856.26 $41.35
5624-015-030 2 0.29 $82.69 $856.26 $23.98
5624-015-034 2 0.48 $82.69 $856.26 $39.69
5624-015-035 2 0.48 $82.69 $856.26 $39.69
5624-015-900 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-015-901 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-015-902 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-016-018 2 3.31 $82.69 $856.26 $273.70
5624-016-019 2 2.36 $82.69 $856.26 $195.15
5624-016-900 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-016-901 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-016-902 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-016-903 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-017-001 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5624-017-002 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
5624-017-016 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5624-017-017 1 0.27 $826.82 $1,119.74 $223.24
169 of 446 Page 3 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5624-017-026 2 0.50 $82.69 $856.26 $41.35
5624-017-027 2 0.61 $82.69 $856.26 $50.44
5624-017-030 1 0.60 $826.82 $1,119.74 $496.09
5624-017-031 2 1.89 $82.69 $856.26 $156.28
5624-017-032 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-017-033 1 0.47 $826.82 $1,119.74 $388.61
5624-017-034 1 0.20 $826.82 $1,119.74 $165.36
5624-018-018 2 0.14 $82.69 $856.26 $11.58
5624-018-019 2 0.82 $82.69 $856.26 $67.81
5624-018-024 1 1.50 $826.82 $1,119.74 $1,240.23
5624-018-027 1 1.27 $826.82 $1,119.74 $1,050.06
5624-022-005 3 1.96 $82.80 $1,234.07 $162.29
5624-022-900 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-022-902 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5624-023-001 3 0.73 $82.80 $1,234.07 $60.44
5624-023-003 3 1.35 $82.80 $1,234.07 $111.78
5624-023-004 3 0.30 $82.80 $1,234.07 $24.84
5624-023-010 3 0.15 $82.80 $1,234.07 $12.42
5624-023-011 3 0.15 $82.80 $1,234.07 $12.42
5624-023-016 3 0.30 $82.80 $1,234.07 $24.84
5624-023-018 3 0.73 $82.80 $1,234.07 $60.44
5624-023-019 3 0.18 $82.80 $1,234.07 $14.90
5624-023-020 3 0.43 $82.80 $1,234.07 $35.60
5624-024-001 3 2.47 $82.80 $1,234.07 $204.52
5624-024-002 3 0.73 $82.80 $1,234.07 $60.44
5624-024-003 3 0.76 $82.80 $1,234.07 $62.93
5624-024-004 3 1.33 $82.80 $1,234.07 $110.12
5624-025-001 3 1.10 $82.80 $1,234.07 $91.08
5624-025-005 3 1.10 $82.80 $1,234.07 $91.08
5624-025-006 3 1.53 $82.80 $1,234.07 $126.68
5624-025-008 3 1.51 $82.80 $1,234.07 $125.03
5624-025-009 3 1.96 $82.80 $1,234.07 $162.29
5624-025-010 3 1.50 $82.80 $1,234.07 $124.20
5624-025-011 3 3.15 $82.80 $1,234.07 $260.82
5624-026-001 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-002 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-026-003 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
170 of 446 Page 4 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5624-026-004 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-026-005 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-006 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-007 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-008 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-009 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-010 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-026-011 3 0.08 $82.80 $1,234.07 $6.62
5624-026-012 3 0.20 $82.80 $1,234.07 $16.56
5624-026-904 3 0.79 $82.80 $1,234.07 $65.41
5624-026-905 3 0.22 $82.80 $1,234.07 $18.22
5624-027-001 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-027-002 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-027-003 3 0.13 $82.80 $1,234.07 $10.76
5624-027-004 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-005 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-006 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-013 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-014 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-015 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-016 3 0.19 $82.80 $1,234.07 $15.73
5624-027-018 3 0.22 $82.80 $1,234.07 $18.22
5624-027-021 3 0.34 $82.80 $1,234.07 $28.15
5624-027-022 3 0.17 $82.80 $1,234.07 $14.08
5624-027-023 3 0.10 $82.80 $1,234.07 $8.28
5624-027-024 3 0.02 $82.80 $1,234.07 $1.66
5624-028-001 3 0.38 $82.80 $1,234.07 $31.46
5624-028-003 3 0.18 $82.80 $1,234.07 $14.90
5624-028-014 3 0.18 $82.80 $1,234.07 $14.90
5624-028-017 3 0.21 $82.80 $1,234.07 $17.39
5624-028-020 3 0.23 $82.80 $1,234.07 $19.04
5624-028-021 3 0.45 $82.80 $1,234.07 $37.26
5624-028-022 3 0.23 $82.80 $1,234.07 $19.04
5624-028-023 3 0.52 $82.80 $1,234.07 $43.06
5624-029-004 3 0.10 $82.80 $1,234.07 $8.28
5624-029-005 3 0.24 $82.80 $1,234.07 $19.87
5624-029-007 3 0.46 $82.80 $1,234.07 $38.09
171 of 446 Page 5 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5624-029-013 3 0.22 $82.80 $1,234.07 $18.22
5624-029-032 3 0.23 $82.80 $1,234.07 $19.04
5627-001-001 1 0.40 $826.82 $1,119.74 $330.73
5627-001-002 1 0.07 $826.82 $1,119.74 $57.88
5627-001-003 1 0.34 $826.82 $1,119.74 $281.12
5627-001-004 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-005 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-006 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-007 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-008 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-009 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-013 2 0.27 $82.69 $856.26 $22.33
5627-001-014 2 0.71 $82.69 $856.26 $58.71
5627-001-016 2 0.44 $82.69 $856.26 $36.38
5627-001-017 2 0.57 $82.69 $856.26 $47.13
5627-001-018 2 0.46 $82.69 $856.26 $38.04
5627-001-019 2 0.50 $82.69 $856.26 $41.35
5627-001-020 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-001-902 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5627-001-903 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5627-002-007 1 1.08 $826.82 $1,119.74 $892.97
5627-002-009 2 0.81 $82.69 $856.26 $66.98
5627-002-010 2 0.84 $82.69 $856.26 $69.46
5627-002-011 2 1.02 $82.69 $856.26 $84.34
5627-002-012 1 0.22 $826.82 $1,119.74 $181.90
5627-002-015 1 0.13 $826.82 $1,119.74 $107.49
5627-002-016 1 0.39 $826.82 $1,119.74 $322.46
5627-002-017 1 2.86 $826.82 $1,119.74 $2,364.71
5627-002-900 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5627-002-901 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5627-003-008 4 3.62 $128.22 $2,914.21 $464.16
5627-003-009 4 0.11 $128.22 $2,914.21 $14.10
5627-003-018 4 3.34 $128.22 $2,914.21 $428.25
5627-003-021 4 1.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $151.30
5627-003-022 4 2.80 $128.22 $2,914.21 $359.02
5627-003-023 4 8.69 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1,114.23
5627-003-801 4 1.68 $128.22 $2,914.21 $215.41
172 of 446 Page 6 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5627-003-901 4 0.08 $128.22 $2,914.21 $10.26
5627-003-902 4 0.42 $128.22 $2,914.21 $53.85
5627-003-903 4 0.62 $128.22 $2,914.21 $79.50
5627-006-003 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-006-004 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-006-005 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-006-006 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-006-007 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-006-008 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-006-900 4 0.00 $128.22 $2,914.21 $0.00
5627-006-901 4 0.00 $128.22 $2,914.21 $0.00
5627-006-902 4 0.00 $128.22 $2,914.21 $0.00
5627-007-005 4 0.08 $128.22 $2,914.21 $10.26
5627-007-006 4 0.08 $128.22 $2,914.21 $10.26
5627-007-007 4 0.16 $128.22 $2,914.21 $20.52
5627-007-008 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-007-009 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-007-010 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-007-011 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-007-012 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-007-013 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-007-017 4 0.32 $128.22 $2,914.21 $41.03
5627-007-018 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-007-019 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-007-020 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-008-009 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-008-010 4 0.21 $128.22 $2,914.21 $26.93
5627-008-011 4 0.22 $128.22 $2,914.21 $28.21
5627-008-021 4 0.61 $128.22 $2,914.21 $78.21
5627-008-023 4 0.31 $128.22 $2,914.21 $39.75
5627-008-900 4 0.00 $128.22 $2,914.21 $0.00
5627-008-901 4 0.09 $128.22 $2,914.21 $11.54
5627-008-902 4 0.23 $128.22 $2,914.21 $29.49
5627-008-903 4 0.28 $128.22 $2,914.21 $35.90
5627-008-904 4 0.55 $128.22 $2,914.21 $70.52
5627-008-906 4 0.03 $128.22 $2,914.21 $3.85
5627-009-001 4 0.27 $128.22 $2,914.21 $34.62
173 of 446 Page 7 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5627-009-002 4 0.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $24.36
5627-009-003 4 0.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $24.36
5627-009-004 4 0.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $24.36
5627-009-005 4 0.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $24.36
5627-009-006 4 0.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $24.36
5627-009-015 4 0.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $24.36
5627-009-017 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-009-018 4 0.20 $128.22 $2,914.21 $25.64
5627-009-019 4 0.32 $128.22 $2,914.21 $41.03
5627-009-020 4 0.58 $128.22 $2,914.21 $74.37
5627-010-001 4 0.28 $128.22 $2,914.21 $35.90
5627-010-004 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-006 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-010 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-011 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-013 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-014 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-016 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-010-025 4 0.15 $128.22 $2,914.21 $19.23
5627-010-028 4 0.27 $128.22 $2,914.21 $34.62
5627-010-029 4 0.73 $128.22 $2,914.21 $93.60
5627-010-035 4 0.42 $128.22 $2,914.21 $53.85
5627-010-036 4 0.40 $128.22 $2,914.21 $51.29
5627-010-037 4 0.55 $128.22 $2,914.21 $70.52
5627-011-005 4 0.15 $128.22 $2,914.21 $19.23
5627-011-013 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-011-014 4 0.33 $128.22 $2,914.21 $42.31
5627-012-002 4 0.08 $128.22 $2,914.21 $10.26
5627-012-003 4 0.04 $128.22 $2,914.21 $5.13
5627-012-007 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-012-008 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-012-019 4 0.44 $128.22 $2,914.21 $56.42
5627-012-022 4 0.13 $128.22 $2,914.21 $16.67
5627-012-023 4 0.11 $128.22 $2,914.21 $14.10
5627-012-027 4 0.48 $128.22 $2,914.21 $61.55
5627-012-028 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-012-030 4 0.11 $128.22 $2,914.21 $14.10
174 of 446 Page 8 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5627-012-031 4 0.44 $128.22 $2,914.21 $56.42
5627-013-038 4 1.55 $128.22 $2,914.21 $198.74
5627-013-900 4 0.01 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1.28
5627-016-044 4 1.95 $128.22 $2,914.21 $250.03
5627-018-019 4 1.39 $128.22 $2,914.21 $178.23
5627-018-020 4 1.38 $128.22 $2,914.21 $176.94
5627-018-021 4 1.55 $128.22 $2,914.21 $198.74
5627-018-025 4 1.21 $128.22 $2,914.21 $155.15
5627-018-026 4 1.93 $128.22 $2,914.21 $247.46
5627-018-027 4 1.38 $128.22 $2,914.21 $176.94
5627-018-030 4 0.94 $128.22 $2,914.21 $120.53
5627-018-035 4 0.99 $128.22 $2,914.21 $126.94
5627-018-039 4 1.90 $128.22 $2,914.21 $243.62
5627-018-040 4 2.23 $128.22 $2,914.21 $285.93
5627-018-043 4 0.01 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1.28
5627-018-044 4 0.59 $128.22 $2,914.21 $75.65
5627-018-045 4 0.83 $128.22 $2,914.21 $106.42
5627-018-060 4 3.26 $128.22 $2,914.21 $418.00
5627-018-061 4 1.70 $128.22 $2,914.21 $217.97
5627-018-062 4 1.73 $128.22 $2,914.21 $221.82
5627-018-063 4 7.53 $128.22 $2,914.21 $965.50
5627-018-065 4 0.37 $128.22 $2,914.21 $47.44
5627-018-066 4 14.32 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1,836.11
5627-018-900 4 0.00 $128.22 $2,914.21 $0.00
5627-019-069 4 1.95 $128.22 $2,914.21 $250.03
5627-019-070 4 1.07 $128.22 $2,914.21 $137.20
5627-019-071 4 1.12 $128.22 $2,914.21 $143.61
5627-019-072 4 3.43 $128.22 $2,914.21 $439.79
5627-019-073 4 0.53 $128.22 $2,914.21 $67.96
5627-019-087 4 5.19 $128.22 $2,914.21 $665.46
5627-019-088 4 13.28 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1,702.76
5627-020-903 5 0.23 $241.88 $1,467.86 $55.63
5627-020-908 5 5.70 $241.88 $1,467.86 $1,378.72
5627-020-910 5 1.22 $241.88 $1,467.86 $295.09
5627-020-911 5 3.86 $241.88 $1,467.86 $933.66
5627-021-014 1 0.58 $826.82 $1,119.74 $479.56
5627-021-016 1 0.77 $826.82 $1,119.74 $636.65
175 of 446 Page 9 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5627-021-017 1 0.69 $826.82 $1,119.74 $570.51
5627-021-018 1 0.65 $826.82 $1,119.74 $537.43
5627-022-001 1 0.57 $826.82 $1,119.74 $471.29
5627-022-002 1 0.29 $826.82 $1,119.74 $239.78
5627-022-003 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5627-022-004 1 0.14 $826.82 $1,119.74 $115.75
5627-022-005 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
5627-022-006 1 0.33 $826.82 $1,119.74 $272.85
5627-022-012 1 1.86 $826.82 $1,119.74 $1,537.89
5627-023-002 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-023-005 4 0.18 $128.22 $2,914.21 $23.08
5627-023-008 4 0.35 $128.22 $2,914.21 $44.88
5627-023-019 4 0.67 $128.22 $2,914.21 $85.91
5627-023-020 4 0.64 $128.22 $2,914.21 $82.06
5627-023-021 4 1.41 $128.22 $2,914.21 $180.79
5627-023-022 4 0.99 $128.22 $2,914.21 $126.94
5627-023-023 4 1.26 $128.22 $2,914.21 $161.56
5627-023-024 4 2.35 $128.22 $2,914.21 $301.32
5627-023-025 4 0.57 $128.22 $2,914.21 $73.09
5627-023-026 4 0.57 $128.22 $2,914.21 $73.09
5627-023-027 4 0.82 $128.22 $2,914.21 $105.14
5627-023-028 4 1.86 $128.22 $2,914.21 $238.49
5627-023-029 4 0.59 $128.22 $2,914.21 $75.65
5627-023-030 4 0.65 $128.22 $2,914.21 $83.34
5627-023-031 4 0.91 $128.22 $2,914.21 $116.68
5627-023-032 4 1.58 $128.22 $2,914.21 $202.59
5627-023-033 4 0.38 $128.22 $2,914.21 $48.72
5627-023-034 4 0.23 $128.22 $2,914.21 $29.49
5627-023-035 4 0.24 $128.22 $2,914.21 $30.77
5627-023-036 4 0.28 $128.22 $2,914.21 $35.90
5627-023-037 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-023-038 4 0.50 $128.22 $2,914.21 $64.11
5627-023-039 4 0.34 $128.22 $2,914.21 $43.59
5627-023-040 4 0.51 $128.22 $2,914.21 $65.39
5627-023-041 4 0.44 $128.22 $2,914.21 $56.42
5627-023-042 4 0.38 $128.22 $2,914.21 $48.72
5627-023-043 4 0.34 $128.22 $2,914.21 $43.59
176 of 446 Page 10 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5627-023-045 4 2.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $274.39
5627-023-046 4 2.26 $128.22 $2,914.21 $289.78
5627-023-047 4 0.43 $128.22 $2,914.21 $55.13
5627-023-900 1 0.84 $826.82 $1,119.74 $694.53
5627-023-901 4 0.01 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1.28
5627-023-904 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5627-023-905 2 0.00 $82.69 $856.26 $0.00
5627-024-003 4 0.15 $128.22 $2,914.21 $19.23
5627-024-005 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-024-006 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-024-007 4 0.15 $128.22 $2,914.21 $19.23
5627-024-011 4 0.14 $128.22 $2,914.21 $17.95
5627-024-013 4 0.50 $128.22 $2,914.21 $64.11
5627-024-014 4 0.49 $128.22 $2,914.21 $62.83
5627-024-015 4 0.69 $128.22 $2,914.21 $88.47
5627-024-904 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5627-024-905 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5627-024-906 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5627-025-001 4 0.15 $128.22 $2,914.21 $19.23
5627-025-002 4 0.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $37.18
5627-025-016 4 0.09 $128.22 $2,914.21 $11.54
5627-025-903 5 0.24 $241.88 $1,467.86 $58.05
5627-025-904 5 0.02 $241.88 $1,467.86 $4.84
5627-025-905 5 0.62 $241.88 $1,467.86 $149.97
5627-025-906 5 0.00 $241.88 $1,467.86 $0.00
5627-025-907 4 0.00 $128.22 $2,914.21 $0.00
5627-025-908 5 0.00 $241.88 $1,467.86 $0.00
5627-025-909 5 0.00 $241.88 $1,467.86 $0.00
5627-025-910 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5627-025-911 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5627-025-912 1 0.00 $826.82 $1,119.74 $0.00
5627-027-055 4 0.95 $128.22 $2,914.21 $121.81
5627-027-056 4 0.88 $128.22 $2,914.21 $112.83
5627-027-057 4 0.25 $128.22 $2,914.21 $32.06
5627-027-058 4 1.62 $128.22 $2,914.21 $207.72
5627-027-060 4 0.83 $128.22 $2,914.21 $106.42
5627-027-061 4 1.13 $128.22 $2,914.21 $144.89
177 of 446 Page 11 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5627-027-062 4 0.50 $128.22 $2,914.21 $64.11
5627-027-063 4 0.54 $128.22 $2,914.21 $69.24
5627-027-064 4 1.96 $128.22 $2,914.21 $251.31
5627-027-067 4 1.07 $128.22 $2,914.21 $137.20
5627-027-068 4 0.52 $128.22 $2,914.21 $66.67
5627-027-069 4 1.29 $128.22 $2,914.21 $165.40
5627-027-075 4 1.85 $128.22 $2,914.21 $237.21
5627-027-078 4 3.13 $128.22 $2,914.21 $401.33
5627-027-079 4 6.06 $128.22 $2,914.21 $777.01
5627-027-900 4 0.01 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1.28
5627-027-901 4 0.01 $128.22 $2,914.21 $1.28
5628-031-017 1 0.19 $826.82 $1,119.74 $157.10
5628-031-018 1 0.34 $826.82 $1,119.74 $281.12
5628-031-019 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
5628-031-020 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
5628-031-021 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5628-031-022 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5628-031-024 1 0.27 $826.82 $1,119.74 $223.24
5628-031-025 1 0.52 $826.82 $1,119.74 $429.95
5628-032-010 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5628-032-011 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-032-012 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-032-013 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-032-014 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5628-038-005 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-038-006 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-038-007 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5628-038-027 1 0.21 $826.82 $1,119.74 $173.63
5628-039-001 1 0.41 $826.82 $1,119.74 $339.00
5628-039-007 1 0.37 $826.82 $1,119.74 $305.92
5628-039-010 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-039-013 1 0.11 $826.82 $1,119.74 $90.95
5628-039-016 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-039-017 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5628-039-018 1 0.23 $826.82 $1,119.74 $190.17
5635-017-020 1 0.61 $826.82 $1,119.74 $504.36
5635-017-021 1 0.55 $826.82 $1,119.74 $454.75
178 of 446 Page 12 of 13
APN
LMD
Zone EBUs
2023/2024
Applied Rate
2023/2024
Maximum Rate
2023/2024
Levy
2023/2024 ASSESSMENT ROLL

NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

CITY OF GLENDALE
5635-017-022 1 0.31 $826.82 $1,119.74 $256.31
5635-019-014 1 0.12 $826.82 $1,119.74 $99.22
5635-019-015 1 0.17 $826.82 $1,119.74 $140.56
179 of 446 Page 13 of 13
9b

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Public Hearing: Ordinance for Introduction of Amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Regarding Hotel Uses, As Directed by City Council on February 7, 2023 (General Plan Amendment Case No. PGPA-001238-2023).

1. Ordinance for Introduction Amending the DSP

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pursuant to City Council direction of February 7. 2023, staff has prepared amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) related to hotel uses. These amendments (General Plan Amendment Case No. PGPA-001238-2023) were presented to the Planning Commission for review on June 7, 2023, and the Commission’s comments and recommendation of adoption of said amendments are included for City Council’s consideration.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council review the proposed amendments to the DSP and introduce and subsequently adopt the Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. 180 of 446
2 BACKGROUND
On October 19, 2021, City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 5977 temporarily prohibiting new hotel development projects within the DSP. On November 30, 2021, City Council extended this hotel use moratorium for 10 months and 15 days (Interim Ordinance No. 5978). The moratorium exempted projects that received at least a Stage I Preliminary Design Review Approval. This moratorium was based on the potential impacts of hotels in Downtown, including several recent proposals that had been approved, and to allow the opportunity to also conduct a market study to identify expected future demand of hotels as well as gaps in the market. On October 18, 2022, City Council adopted a one-year extension of the hotel use moratorium (Interim Ordinance No. 5995), which is the final extension allowed by law. The hotel moratorium will thus expire in approximately three months, on October 19, 2023, by operation of law, unless sooner terminated by the City Council through adoption of zoning or development standards related to the subject of the moratorium, or through other Council action.

On September 13, 2022, City Council directed staff to investigate changes to the DSP hotel use incentive system. City Council requested the changes focus on the development of amenity-rich hotels that would bring new hospitality typologies to the City, while filling gaps within the hotel market. City Council also requested more information on the potential to use a Conditional Use Permit process for hotel uses within the DSP.

On February 7, 2023, staff provided City Council an outline of recommended amendments to the current hotel incentive program to encourage hotel developments that fill gaps in the type and quality of hotels in Downtown Glendale. The recommendations were derived from a market study commissioned by the City that identified the need for amenity-rich hotels that would include services such as spas, meaningful event space, and high-quality catering. Following feedback and direction from City Council, staff drafted updates to DSP regarding hotel uses in general and also specific threshold standards for hotels related to the DSP Community Benefit Incentive Program. Council also directed staff to no longer consider the Conditional Use Permit process.

In addition to amendments related to hotel uses/standards, staff is also presenting some minor DSP clean-ups and clarifications also reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission.

ANALYSIS
Hotels are a permitted use in the DSP and hotel projects can be developed by two different means: either by right in compliance with the DSP zoning standards (height, FAR, design) or through the Community Benefit Incentive Program. This program affords increased building height and FAR for certain projects, such as hotels, which provide community benefits in line with the City’s priorities. The community benefit of a hotel is based on its role as an important component of a thriving business district that not only provides temporary accommodations for guest and visitors, but also amenities available for use by the general public, such as entertainment, restaurants and meeting 181 of 446
3 rooms. Hotels also support increased economic activity and increased retail tax revenue. If a hotel meets the community benefit system objectives, hotels can build to the maximum allowable height and/or density within the proposed project’s district.

During the February 7, 2023 meeting, Council’s discussion focused on ensuring a higher caliber of hotel uses in the Downtown by requiring certain amenities and services. In order to meet the need for amenity-rich hotels in the Downtown, as identified in the presented hotel market study, Council directed that a range of community benefit options be incorporated into the DSP, providing clarity for applicants and the public. Council also specified that all hotels, regardless of whether the Community Benefit Program was utilized, be required to covenant (or agree) to maintain the use as a hotel, and provide the community benefits, in perpetuity; this would be done through a Development Agreement by the City and the hotel developer. Lastly, Council discussed possibly changing hotels from a “by right” land use in the DSP to a conditionally permitted one that would require a Conditional Use Permit. However, following much discussion, Council elected to forgo adding another separate discretionary process in addition to the Development Agreement process, as well as the required Design Review process, which already addresses site planning, massing and scale, and architectural design issues. It was pointed out that if the intent is to have amenity-rich hotels in Downtown, the CUP process is not a discretionary review procedure conducive to conditioning projects to incorporate certain features or amenities. Council’s ultimate direction was to focus on the hotel requirements and amenities instead.

The list below outlines the proposed amendments to the DSP, based on Council’s direction, as set forth in the Ordinance for introduction:

DSP Chapter 3 – Land Use Amendments
To address Council’s direction, staff proposes to amend the DSP Land Use Chapter 3 by modifying the existing hotel definition to ensure a higher caliber of hotel in the DSP and to require a Development Agreement for all new hotels. Staff recommends the following new footnote for hotels in the Land Use Chart – Table 3-A-4:
“Hotel” means a building in which there are fifty (50) or more guest rooms where temporary lodging is provided for compensation, for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, and where no provision is made for stove-top or oven cooking in any individual room or suite. A development agreement or covenant is required for all new hotels in the DSP. All new hotels in the DSP must also meet the minimum quality standard of facilities and service equal to the general requirements of an American Automobile Association three (3) diamond rating or higher, as established in the “AAA Hotel Requirements and Diamond Guidelines” and all subsequent amendments thereto.”
As called out in this footnote, staff is recommending that all new hotels provide amenities and services equal to AAA’s established rating system’s three diamond status, or equivalent. According to the rating guidelines (Exhibit 3), this would mean that new hotels must be “distinguished, multifaceted with enhanced physical attributes, amenities and guest comforts”, versus a two diamond status hotel which would be 182 of 446 4 “affordable, with modestly enhanced facilities, décor and amenities”. The AAA guidelines go into further detail regarding Exterior, Public Areas, Guest Rooms, Bathrooms, and other hospitality standards required for the three diamond rating level; the combination of such amenities would ensure that all new proposals meet the elevated caliber of hotels intended by Council in the DSP.

The proposed footnote also specifies that all hotel development projects in the DSP, regardless of the hotel development project’s election to utilize any available incentives, shall enter into a development agreement and/or covenant with the City, as directed by Council. Because Council called for hotel developments to be of a specified quality and type, this development agreement requirement will memorialize the caliber and amenities of hotel project.

DSP Chapter 7 – Community Benefits Amendments
All new hotels in the DSP currently have the option of utilizing the Community Benefits (incentive) Program to maximize development potential. While the existing hotel incentive system that allows for increases to height and FAR is being maintained and no changes are proposed to the height and FAR limits, Council directed that the requirements for a hotel to participate in the incentive program be modified and enhanced.

Proposed amendments to DSP Section 7.2.3 - Hotel include a new point-based system of menu options that ensures all new hotels utilizing the Community Benefits Program feature increased amenities and community benefits. Each enhanced onsite use or amenity is assigned a point value, depending on the extent of the community benefit. To achieve the maximum development potential, new hotels must not only meet the minimum quality standard of facilities and service equal to the general requirements of an AAA three diamond rating, but also, they must provide a combination of features and amenities that total a minimum of 10 points. This menu of features and amenities includes those identified in the Council motion from February 7th, such as restaurants and taverns (using the AAA diamond rating system), meeting spaces, additional publicly accessible open space, sustainable design, local hiring agreement, contribution to the City’s affordable housing fund, etc., as well as ones proposed by staff. For example, staff suggests that a five diamond hotel, with all the luxury appointments and amenities associated with this rating level, automatically be granted the 10 points required for the additional/maximum height and FAR in the subject zone. Developers can incorporate any combination of such uses and amenities in the table, provided the value totals 10 points. This guarantees higher caliber, amenity-rich hotels with greater community benefits, as intended by Council, while allowing greater flexibility to the hotel developer/operator with menu options.
183 of 446
5 Amendments to the DSP Section 7.2.3 include a new definition for the local hiring requirement*, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. A labor peace agreement requirement was requested by City Council to be considered as a community benefit. However, after discussion with a local union and legal research and analysis by the City Attorney’s Office, it is staff’s opinion that the inclusion of a labor peace requirement as an optional menu item has some legal risks, in that there is an argument that such a regulation, though voluntary, may be preempted by Federal law under the broad preemption doctrine applicable to the National Labor Relations Act. Accordingly, staff can no longer recommend a labor peace agreement to be a consideration for an incentive. Staff explained these concerns to the Planning Commission, and the Commission specifically recommended that a labor peace agreement requirement option not be included in the Ordinance.

Use or Amenity Points
Minimum quality standard of facilities and service equal to the general requirements of an AAA five (5) diamond rating or higher, as established in the “AAA Hotel Requirements and Diamond Guidelines” and all subsequent amendments thereto, or equivalent rating system. 10 Minimum quality standard of facilities and service equal to the general requirements of an AAA four (4) diamond rating or higher, as established in the “AAA Hotel Requirements and Diamond Guidelines” and all subsequent amendments thereto, or equivalent rating system. 8 Full-service restaurant, upscale and comparable to a AAA Three Diamond restaurant
4 Full-service restaurant, not upscale/AAA Two Diamond, with breakfast service
3 Full-service restaurant, not upscale/AAA Two Diamond, without breakfast service
2 Roof-top deck with full-service restaurant or tavern 4 Tavern (bar or lounge), separate from restaurant 3
Separate spa facility open to the public 3
Separate convention or meeting space available to the
public/community
3 Additional publicly accessible open space equivalent to a minimum of 20% of the required publicly accessible open space
2 Live entertainment, as defined in GMC 5.16.010 and subject to any required licenses and/or permits
2 LEED Platinum (or equivalent) sustainable design 5
Contribution equal to the half of the amount of the affordable housing commercial development impact fee, as defined in GMC Chapter 4.11, from which hotels are currently exempt
5 Local hiring requirement* 2
Participation in the GWP peak demand response program 3 Participation in transportation demand program (if not already required by the GMC 30.32.171)
1 Airport shuttle 1
Available bicycle rental or bicycle share program 1
184 of 446
6 For the sake of illustration, below are several combinations that would meet the minimum 10 point requirement for the enhanced Community Benefit Hotel incentive program:

Scenario 1:
4-star hotel 8
Local hiring requirement 2

Scenario 2:

Full service restaurant, upscale, 3-stars 4
LEED Platinum sustainable design 5
Airport shuttle 1
Scenario 3:

Roof-top deck with restaurant 4
Additional publicly accessible open space 2
Labor peace agreement 2

Scenario 4:

Full service restaurant, 2-stars without breakfast 2
Separate meeting space 3
Contribution to affordable housing fund 5

Scenario 5:

Full service restaurant, 2-stars with breakfast 3
Separate spa facility open to the public 3
Participation in GWP Peak Demand Program 3
Available bicycle rental program 1

Proposed hotels utilizing the Community Benefits program would not be limited to the above scenarios but could incorporate any combination of the uses and amenities identified in the table.

Additional Proposed Amendment to Chapter 7 – Community Benefits Staff is also proposing two minor clean-ups to the DSP 7.2.1 SB 1818 Affordable Housing Density Bonus Law incentive program: eliminating references to “SB 1818” and updating the maximum density bonus from 35 percent to 50 percent to be consistent with State law.

Planning Commission Review
The proposed amendments were reviewed by the Planning Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting on June 7, 2023. The Planning voted unanimously (4-0) to recommend approval of the DSP amendments to City Council. The Planning Commission also supported the recommendation of staff (as further described at the hearing) that the labor peace agreement be eliminated as a menu option item. 185 of 446
7 STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Public notices consistent with state law and Glendale Municipal Code were provided for the proposed amendments.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Project has been determined to be exempt from further environmental review under CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because the majority of the proposed amendments deal with clarifications and additional entitlement requirements for hotels in the DSP, and the minor additional amendments to the density bonus provisions to be consistent with state law, that do not affect the current development thresholds related to FAR, density and height, and do not have any potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Introduce and subsequently adopt the ordinance amending the DSP, as described in this report.

Alternative 2: Do not introduce the ordinance amending the DSP, in which case the development standards and guidelines in the DSP will remain as is, and the moratorium on new hotel uses will continue until its expiration on October 19, 2023.

Alternative 3: Introduce and subsequently adopt the ordinance amending the DSP, as described in this report, but with revisions.

Alternative 4: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Vilia Zemaitaitis, Principal Planner
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Planning Commission’s Motion, dated June 7, 2023

2. City Council Motion and Staff Report, dated February 7, 2023

3. Current AAA Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines - Lodging 2019

4. Current AAA Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines – Restaurants 2019
186 of 446
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DSP),

REGARDING HOTEL USES
(CASE NO. PGPA-001238-2023)
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1. DSP Section 3.3 Land Uses & Permit Requirements - Land Use Chart Table 3-A-1 is hereby amended for hotel uses, as shown in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. DSP Chapter 7 – Community Benefit, Sections 7.2.1 – SB 1818 Affordable Housing Density Bonus Law and 7.2.3 – Hotel, are hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 4. Severability. This ordinance is adopted under the authority of the Charter of the City of Glendale and State law. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase is declared invalid or otherwise void by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any remaining provision hereof. In this regard the City Council finds and declares that it would have adopted this measure notwithstanding any partial invalidity hereof.

SECTION 5. Development or tentative tract map applications which have been deemed complete, hotel projects that have received at least a Stage I Preliminary Design Review approval, approved discretionary entitlements, or ministerial projects submitted to plan check prior to the adoption of this ordinance shall be reviewed under the zoning rules and regulations which were in effect on the day prior to adoption of this ordinance. The foregoing notwithstanding, any applicant may make a request in writing to the Director of Community Development that his or her application be reviewed under the zoning rules and regulations as amended by this ordinance.

Passed by the Council of the City of Glendale on the day of , 2023.

Mayor
Attest
City Clerk
1 187 of 446

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE)
I, Suzie Abajian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, California, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was passed by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, by a vote of four-fifths (4/5ths) of the members thereof, at a regular meeting held on the
Ayes:
day of , 2023 by the following vote:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
2 188 of 446
Exhibit A
189 of 446
190 of 446
191 of 446
192 of 446
193 of 446
194 of 446
195 of 446
196 of 446
197 of 446
Exhibit B
198 of 446
199 of 446
200 of 446
201 of 446
202 of 446
203 of 446
204 of 446
205 of 446

7.3.5 Public Art 7.3.6 Priority Uses

COMMUNITY BENEFIT COMMUNITY BENEFIT
Public art helps to improve the character and
physical environment of Glendale. It promotes
and enhances the general welfare by allowing
citizens to experience and interact with artworks
in an environment that is open to all. Public art
encourages community pride through its power
to create distinctive places that are unique to
Glendale. Placing works of art in key public
locations helps establish a cultural legacy for the
City by allowing the shared cultural experience
of art, accessible to all, to extend over many
generations.

To ensure a livable urban environment for all, the
City may identify particular uses that are deficient
in or around downtown, or would add to the
overall quality of life for residents, visitors, and
those employed within the City.

A project shall provide one of the following:

A. Child care or day care facility open to the public.

B. Artist studio.

C. Performance venue such as a community
theater or art gallery.

D. Other use defined as a priority by City Council
and approved by the Director of Community
Development.

STANDARDS
A. Projects must comply with the Urban Art
requirements of GMC Chapter 30.37 and the
public art must be installed and maintained onsite in the publicly accessible open space area.

B. The applicant shall submit an application for
the Urban Art Plan, and the application shall
be considered by City Council or as part of the
project's design review process.

C. The urban artwork approved with the Urban
Art Plan shall be installed in compliance with
the Urban Art Plan prior to issuance of Final
Certificate of Occupancy.

ABOVE: Public art as a community benefit ABOVE: A day care facility or artist studio as a community benefit.

GLENDALE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PꢀN 7-9
206 of 446
1 PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION
Moved by Planning Commissioner Lee, and seconded by Planning Commissioner Minassian, that this project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3), as described in the staff report dated June 7, 2023, and that upon consideration at a public hearing of the proposed ordinance relating generally to regulations for hotel projects in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) area, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to DSP Chapters 3 and 7 (General Plan Amendment Case No. PGPA001238-2023). The Planning Commission supports the recommendation of staff (as further described at the hearing) that the labor peace agreement requirement be eliminated as a menu option item.

Adopted this 7th day of June, 2023.

VOTE
Ayes: Chraghchian, Fuentes, Lee, Minassian
Noes:

Absent: Shahbazian
Abstain:
207 of 446
208 of 446
209 of 446

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Direction Regarding Downtown Specific Plan Hotel Incentives

1. Motion providing specific direction to staff to amend the Downtown Specific Plan hotel incentives

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for February 7, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff has outlined recommended amendments to the current incentive program for hotel uses in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The recommendations would amend the DSP incentive system to encourage hotel developments that fulfill gaps in the type and quality of hotels proposed and eventually developed in Downtown Glendale. If City Council agrees with staff’s recommendations, staff will make changes to the incentive program, and return to City Council for adoption (following Planning Commission recommendation), which will then end the current hotel use moratorium in the DSP. Staff is requesting direction from City Council regarding staff’s recommended amendments. 210 of 446
2 a

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council direct staff to update the hotel use incentive within the DSP, and return for adoption, following Planning Commission recommendation, ending the existing hotel moratorium.

BACKGROUND
On October 19, 2021, City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 5977 temporarily prohibiting new hotel development projects within the DSP. City Council extended this hotel use moratorium for 10 months and 15 days on November 30, 2021 (Interim Ordinance No. 5978). The moratorium exempted projects that had an approved development agreement prior to the effective date, as well as any hotel project that had received at least a Stage I Design Review Approval. This moratorium was based on the potential impacts of hotels in Downtown, including several recent proposals that had been approved, and to also conduct a market study to identify expected future demand of hotels within the City. On October 18, 2022, City Council adopted a one-year extension of the hotel use moratorium (Interim Ordinance No. 5995), which is the final extension allowed by law. The hotel moratorium will thus expire on October 19, 2023 by operation of law, unless sooner terminated by the City Council through adoption of zoning or development standards related to the subject of the moratorium, or through other Council action.

The recommendation was derived from a market study commissioned by the City that identified the need for amenity-rich hotels that would include services such as spas, meaningful event space, and high-quality catering.

ANALYSIS
Use Incentive
Hotels can be developed by two different means. Currently, hotels are a permitted use in the Downtown and in all DSP districts. Provided that a proposed project meets the development standards of the project’s DSP zoning district (height, FAR, design, etc.), a project can be developed by-right. Like all downtown developments, a hotel project must go through the Design Review process, including Stage I and II by City Council, as well as advisory review by the Design Review Board.

Hotel developments can also utilize the hotel use incentive. Hotel uses are identified in DSP, Chapter 7 as a community benefit, and, as such, are afforded increased density and building height. A hotel is defined as a community benefit based on its role as an 211 of 446
3 a

important component of a thriving business district, and its ability to oftentimes provide amenities that are available for use by the general public. These amenities can include entertainment, restaurants, and meeting rooms. Hotels that participate in the community benefit program are required to provide ground floor designs that enhance the uses and activity of the pedestrian realm. This can be accomplished by including cafes, restaurants, or retail space at the ground level, as well as public art.

The use incentive was included in the original 2006 DSP and maintained during the 2019 updates. The goal of the incentive has been to encourage the development of hotels, which had been identified as a needed use in the downtown. This need has been based on what had been a deficiency of hotel rooms in Downtown Glendale, and the desire to create a more attractive destination for visitors within the region. In addition to creating vibrancy in the downtown, hotels generate revenue for the City by way of the transient occupancy tax (TOT). Encouraging hotels to be built would lead to increased sales, property, and TOT tax revenue for the City as hotels open for business.

If a hotel meets the community benefit system objectives, hotels can build to the maximum allowable height and/or density within the proposed project’s district as illustrated in the table below. In exchange, hotels are required to covenant (or agree) to maintain the use as a hotel, and provide the community benefit, in perpetuity.

Staff proposes that the existing hotel incentive system that allows for increases to height and density be maintained, but that requirements for a hotel to participate in the incentive program be modified. The proposed modifications would focus the incentive program on hotel typologies and amenities that are currently deficient within the City. Other types of hotels without such amenities would still be allowed, but would not be eligible to use the incentive system.
212 of 446
4 a

Hotel typologies can be distinguished by star ratings (or equivalent rating structure). To obtain a four or five start rating, hotels must provide certain amenities, services, and ambiance. As part of this report, staff has outlined potential amenities and services that could create a menu of options for future developments. These have been separated into two categories: spatial requirements and amenities. These could include the following:

Spatial Requirements:
• Spa;
• Convention Center Space;
• Suite Options for Rooms;
• Upscale Full-Service Restaurant;
• Separate Lounge or Bar Area;
• Upscale Gift Shop; and
• Enhanced Catering Services for Large Scale Events.

Amenities:
• Art Gallery;
• Spa Services;
• Multiple Guest Service Areas (i.e. concierge, bell stand, video kiosk, etc.); • Enhanced Fitness Facilities; and
• Live Entertainment.

The above list of amenities and requirements does not represent all potential options; staff is seeking feedback on additional spatial requirements or amenities, as well as the number or combination (e.g.,. one spatial requirement and two amenities) that could be required for any future hotel that utilizes the incentive system. Following Council input, staff will develop potential alternatives and a full list that would be presented at the time of adoption of any amendments to the hotel use incentive. This would include minimum square footage requirements for any spatial requirement item.

Conditional Use Permit
City Council also expressed a desire to evaluate the possibility of imposing a new conditional use permit (CUP) requirement for hotels, instead of allowing them by right. In general, a CUP is a zoning tool used to ensure that a proposed use is compatible in operation with the surrounding neighborhood, such as regarding noise, lighting, safety, etc. Such uses often include taverns, banquet halls, heliports, transmission facilities, etc.

A noticed public hearing is required for all CUPs and conditions can be applied to individual projects that address specific contextual challenges and possible operational issues to ensure compatibility. Moreover, if there is evidence that a use is violating a condition of its CUP, enforcement tools include the revocation or modification of the CUP, following a public hearing.
213 of 446
5 a

Currently, all hotel projects in the DSP undergo Design Review that includes review by the City Council at both Stage I (conceptual design) and Stage II (final design and environmental review), as well as an advisory review by the Design Review Board (DRB).

Each of these reviews present opportunities to provide feedback, guidance, and conditions (or comments in the case of DRB) to ensure that a project is contextually appropriate and responsive to design review standards.

Adding a CUP requirement may add some redundancy to the existing DRB process related to contextual issues. However, DRB conditions are limited to design and architectural considerations such as colors, materials, window/door placement, mass, scale and articulation. Compared to the incentive process recommended, the DRB process is not an effective tool to require or even to encourage desired amenities or features.

Similarly, the CUP process would not be a particularly effective tool to encourage high quality hotels with desired amenities either. CUP conditions must generally be reasonably related to protecting the surrounding property and neighborhood or to lessen or prevent any detrimental effect. Thus, CUP conditions typically focus on eliminating or at least reducing the secondary impacts that typically stem from the unique use being permitted, such as: noise (through limits on hours of operation, including on after-hours loading/unloading, among other activities), visual/aesthetic (through limits on signs or lighting/glare), traffic, litter, and safety/crime. As such, the CUP process is not a discretionary review procedure conducive to conditioning projects to incorporate certain features or amenities.

Moreover, new hotels would undergo environmental review to disclose and analyze any environmental impacts and would require mitigation for significant environmental effects.

These mitigation measures may also lessen the same secondary impacts a CUP may address, though a CUP may be more effective at imposing conditions that address operational issues as opposed to CEQA mitigation measures that are imposed to avoid or lessen significant environmental impacts identified in a mitigated negative declaration or an EIR. CUP conditions must be related to the project impacts but may address operational conditions unrelated to environmental impacts. That being said, it is staff’s assessment that adding a CUP process will not likely add appreciable value to the current process of entitling a new hotel use given City Council’s goal of encouraging more highquality hotels with specific amenities and offerings. Notably, staff investigated other cities in the region and did not discover any that require a CUP for a hotel use.

In sum, staff believes that a CUP requirement would lengthen the review process with no appreciable additional value, as Design Review and Development Agreements (both utilized in the development of any Downtown hotel project) allow for the application of conditions unique to the site or surrounding context. Furthermore, the Environmental 214 of 446
6 a

Review process would address the project’s environmental impacts and impose mitigation measures to address significant environmental impacts. Accordingly, the most effective way to meaningfully increase the number of hotels with certain desired amenities and qualities, of which the City is deficient, is to adopt targeted and attractive incentives that have a high likelihood of being utilized. These types of incentives will go a very long way to ensure the types of hotels proposed meet the needs of the community and of the tourists/visitors the City wants to attract.

Furthermore, because hotels using the incentive will be required to enter into a recorded covenant or statutory Development Agreement with the City, that runs with the land, to ensure that the City receives the benefit of the Hotel Incentive in exchange for the incentive, the City will be able to include some operational and maintenance requirements in such an agreement. A Development Agreement (“DA”) is a negotiated contract between the City and a developer that is adopted by City ordinance pursuant to state law (Government Code section 65864) and which is recorded against the property proposed for development. The DA typically “freezes” the then-current land use, development and/or zoning regulations for a particular project, and must advance the City’s local planning policies and be consistent with the General Plan. This provides cities and developers certainty over time as to which regulations will apply to a project and is important for larger or phased developments. DAs can also contain provisions that lock in the community benefits and set forth the specific incentive program provisions applicable to a project. The DA is an important planning tool that allows public agencies greater latitude to advance local planning policies, sometimes in new and creative ways.

If Council desires, the hotel use incentive may be modified to require the Development Agreement to contain covenants ensuring the community benefits are implemented. Staff recommends that the range of community benefit options be incorporated into the DSP so as to provide clarity for applicants and the public at large.

Next Steps
Following feedback and direction from City Council, staff will draft updates to the DSP Hotel Use Incentive consistent with the goal and intent of attracting high-quality, amenityrich hotels to fill the existing market gap. Staff will present the proposed changes to the Planning Commission for recommendation and return to City Council to adopt any recommended changes.

Upon Council adoption of any amendments to the hotel use incentive, the existing moratorium would terminate, unless it expires sooner by operation of law.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A.
215 of 446
7 a

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Environmental Review of any DSP amendment City Council directs staff to prepare will be conducted prior to Planning Commission consideration of such amendments.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide feedback and specific direction with respect to amendments to the hotel use incentive, including to the proposed amenity system, and direct staff to make updates the Downtown Specific Plan Hotel Use Incentive.

2. Provide feedback, decline to direct staff to amend the Downtown Specific Plan Hotel Use Incentive, and provide alternative direction regarding requiring a CUP or otherwise changing the existing land use requirements for hotels within the Downtown Specific Plan.

3. Council may choose any other alternative not recommended by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
216 of 446
217 of 446
ntroduction
Dear Hospitality Professional,
We genuinely value your interest in our unique AAA Inspected & Approved program. Only AAA solicits and combines travel preferences of over 59 million members with hospitality trends and opinion to create an inspection and approval process that is world renowned. Our program is designed to use professional travel experts and member-driven criteria to quantify and recommend only the finest accommodations in the most desired travel destinations. To that end, we proudly present the latest edition of the AAA Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines for lodgings.

These guidelines are provided with two objectives in mind:
♦ To ensure our ratings program is accurate and relevant to the travel information needs of over 59 million AAA/CAA members.
♦ To provide a valuable reference to help property managers and owners achieve your goal of being AAA Inspected & Approved and Diamond Rated.

AAA values opportunities to partner with the hospitality industry by gathering your input, discussing our ratings and openly sharing with you how the Diamond Rating System applies to your property. We urge you to take full advantage of the information provided by AAA inspectors during evaluations, as our experts collectively visit more than 28,000 lodgings every year — gathering insight on a wide range of lodging styles and experiences across the United States, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean.

We appreciate your continued service to members and participation in AAA programs.

Sincerely,
Michael Petrone
Michael Petrone, CEC
Director, AAA Content Development
A brief note about AAA and property inspections: Since its inception in 1902 as a federation of independent motor clubs, AAA has existed to help make road travel safer and more enjoyable for its now more than 59 million members. AAA is a leading provider of roadside assistance, travel services and trip planning products, and an influential voice in automotive and travel safety legislation and funding. AAA offers member discounts, insurance and financial services.

More than 80 years ago, in 1937, AAA hired its first field representatives to inspect and report on lodgings and restaurants. In 1963, AAA introduced a rating system for lodgings, adding the diamond symbol in 1977 in honor of the association’s 75-year anniversary. A decade later, the Diamond Rating system was expanded to include inspector ratings for restaurants, prompting AAA to seek industry input for its first comprehensive AAA Approval & Diamond Rating Guidelines for restaurants, published in 1989. Prior to this, only minimum Approval Requirements were printed and distributed on request.

I
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 2 218 of 446
Section One
AAA Inspected & Approved
Meet the Inspectors!
Section Two
The Inspection Process
Part 1: Apply for an inspection
What to expect during the AAA on-site inspection
Part 2: Fulfill AAA Approval Requirements
Approval Requirements and Diamond Rating Guidelines – what’s the difference?
Part 3: Achieve your AAA Diamond Rating
The AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines
What the Diamonds Mean
Glossary
Exterior
Public Areas
Guest Rooms
Bathrooms
The AAA Four and Five Diamond Ratings
Four and Five Diamond Service Expectations
AAA Hospitality Standards
Section Three
The Listing
AAA Lodging Listings: Rich in Inspection Details
Eligibility Criteria for Separate Lodging Listing
FYI Designation
Lodging Classifications and Subclassifications
Accessibility
Member Comment Procedures
The AAA Appeals Process
Green Programs
Contact Information

CONTENTS
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 3 219 of 446

SECTION ONE
MEET THE INSPECTORS!
While we can’t reveal their identities, we can offer you a closer look at the qualities and experiences that make AAA’s seasoned industry professionals so fascinating.

Meet the Experts
Scroll through creatively angled portraits that tell a
story and captivating biographies on topics from
previous jobs to food and travel tips.

Inspector Shadows
Tag along as reporters and bloggers
follow AAA inspectors on actual lodging
and restaurant evaluations, watching and
listening as they look under bedspreads
and sample the menus.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 4 220 of 446
Twitter
Follow your favorite #AAAInspector @AAA_Travel for a
smorgasbord of entertaining observations and
discoveries from the road.

Inspection Videos
Enjoy a behind-the-scenes look at how AAA
inspections are conducted. Follow along on an actual
evaluation to see what inspectors expect and look for
on the job.

Visit AAA.com/Diamonds for more!
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 5 221 of 446
AAA Inspectors: THE Travel Experts
hen AAA inspectors enter properties across
North America – unscheduled and requesting
prompt access to guest rooms – good things
follow. That’s because, for more than 80 years,
AAA has represented the gold standard for lodging and
restaurant inspections.

Long before there were websites, social networks and
consumer reviews to help travelers find a clean lodging and a good meal, AAA inspectors were looking under beds and
tasting the meatloaf all along North America’s roadways.

Since 1937, AAA has been conducting on-site evaluations and publishing the results to help members make informed travel decisions. AAA attributes this longevity to a system so reliable it benefits industry as much as travelers – plus a team of highly trained, full-time inspectors with extensive industry experience.

ONE APPROVAL, FIVE DIAMONDS
Unlike many rating providers, AAA excludes substandard
properties. “Only good options are AAA Inspected &
Approved, so members can focus on the fit,” said AAA
Director of Content Development Michael Petrone. “That’s where the Diamonds come in. After properties pass
inspection they receive a rating of one to five AAA
Diamonds.”
The number of Diamonds lets travelers know what to expect.

Sometimes a good night’s sleep or a simple meal is all that’s needed. Other times the facilities, ambience and services are essential to the experience. “Each additional Diamond
indicates more elaborate surroundings and attention from service staff,” said Petrone.

The guidelines inspectors apply follow a progression based on what’s typical across the industry, with increased
expectations at each level. The attributes are weighted based on member priorities. “The collective result is a highly reliable way of categorizing,” said Petrone. “Travelers can use the quick-glance AAA Inspector Ratings or take in the full picture with the wealth of descriptive details also provided.”
CONNECTING TO 59 MILLION MEMBERS
How do properties benefit from such scrutiny? They have the assurance of published, regularly calibrated Approval
Requirements and Diamond Rating Guidelines – and an
opportunity for immediate face time with inspectors to
discuss the results, market trends and potential property changes.

Once ratings are confirmed, lodgings and restaurants are added to AAA’s database for listing in travel information and trip planning tools. This means exposure to 59 million
AAA/CAA members in the resources they use to make travel planning and buying decisions – and eligibility for logo licensing and advertising programs for increased visibility and reach.

W
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 6 222 of 446

SECTION TWO

THE INSPECTION PROCESS
The inspection process includes three parts:

1. Apply for an inspection using the form available at AAA.biz/Diamonds.

2. Fulfill AAA’s Approval Requirements and receive the AAA Inspected & Approved designation.

3. Achieve your AAA Diamond Rating calculated from objective rating scores recorded during the inspection and subjective elements based on the inspector’s professional experience and training.

PART 1: Apply for an inspection
By applying for – and/or consenting to – an inspection, you agree to allow AAA to publish your property information and the respective Diamond Rating in our digital and printed travel information. Currently listed establishments need not reapply, as our inspectors routinely reassess Approved properties.

To expedite the application process, we suggest the following approach:
• Verify your property's eligibility by reviewing the AAA Approval Requirements. Properties must meet all Approval Requirements to be valid applicants.
• Complete and submit the Lodging Inspection Application (pdf). • Complete and submit the Lodging Application Processing Fee Form (pdf). The nonrefundable $500 application processing fee helps offset the costs of validating property information; it does not guarantee an inspection or influence the outcome.

Important notes:
• If our records indicate past disqualifying issues, you may be asked to provide written documentation and receipts of the corrective action taken since then.
• AAA does not guarantee an immediate inspection of all properties that apply, and we reserve the right to apply priority consideration to those demonstrating the highest degree of AAA member value according to the following criteria:
 PREFERRED LOCATION
 NEWLY BUILT / RENOVATED
 REPUTATION
 HIGH DEGREE OF CLEANLINESS AND COMFORT
 APPROPRIATELY MAINTAINED CONDITIONS
• We will provide written notice of your application status as soon as possible after completing our review. • If your property is selected for inspection, the unannounced visit will occur within one year of the application date as we have an inspector available in your area.
• Basic listings in AAA travel products are provided without charge to AAA Inspected & Approved properties and those designated as FYIs.

For more information, review our Applications FAQ.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 7 223 of 446
What to Expect During the AAA On-Site Inspection
Introduction, Interview
On arrival (unannounced), the AAA inspector will speak with a property representative for a brief, but extremely important, interview to:
• Collect factual information for potential use in AAA travel products. • Be advised by you of any recent changes and/or plans for improvement. • Answer your questions.

Property Assessment
Following the interview, the inspector will request a tour of all public areas and a cross section of guest rooms.

We strongly encourage owner/management and key personnel to participate during the inspection as our inspector will point out strengths and weaknesses of your property as appropriate*.
*This valuable, no-cost dialogue is unique to the AAA inspection process.

PROPERTIES MUST MEET ALL AAA APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS BEFORE RATING FACTORS ARE ASSESSED.

Assessment Summary
If a property meets all rating requirements and is Approved, the inspector will recommend a Diamond Rating based on the points assigned to public areas, guest rooms and bathrooms as noted at the time of the inspection. Each approved property will receive a AAA Inspected & Approved decal at the conclusion of the evaluation to affix in a visible property location. Additionally, we will provide you a AAA Inspection Summary by email which includes your property’s Approval status and the Diamond Rating (if applicable)*. *This valuable information is unique to the AAA inspection process.

For more information, review our Inspections FAQ.

Lodging Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 8 224 of 446
PART 2: Fulfill AAA Approval Requirements

AAA APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS REFLECT THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS AS ESTABLISHED THROUGH MEMBER FEEDBACK*.
*This research is unique to the AAA inspection process.

To be designated as AAA Inspected & Approved, an establishment must pass inspection by meeting the following requirements:

Cleanliness and Condition

1. All facilities associated with a property are clean and well maintained throughout.

2. At a minimum, each guest unit is thoroughly cleaned, with complete bed and bath linens changed between guest stays.

3. Basic housekeeping services and supplies are available on request.

4. All indoor areas are properly heated, air-conditioned and/or ventilated to ensure guest comfort.

Management and Style of Operation
Businesses will:

5. Provide AAA/CAA members value in all aspects of operation.

6. Cater primarily to transient rather than residential guests, with four or more private units available for AAA/CAA members.

7. Maintain compliance with all local, state and federal codes.

Owners/Operators will:

8. Assist AAA in the resolution of AAA/CAA member complaints.

9. Accommodate unannounced AAA property inspections within 20 minutes of notice.

10. Conduct business in a professional and ethical manner — providing attentive, conscientious service to guests.

11. Place AAA/CAA members in AAA Inspected & Approved guest units only. Overflow buildings or guest units associated with the property, but not approved by AAA, are not acceptable accommodations.

12. Provide a responsible representative readily accessible at all times to address guest needs or requests.

13. Provide guests 24-hour access to communications for emergency or critical information.

Owners/Operators will not:

14. Use AAA branding (logo, Diamond Ratings) without AAA’s explicit permission.

Exterior and Public Areas
Businesses will have:

15. Accurate, legible signage in appropriate areas (e.g., entry, corridors, walkways, stairways, landings, parking areas).

16. Good illumination in all public areas (e.g., entry, corridors, walkways, stairways, landings, parking areas).

17. Procedures in place to ensure all facilities associated with a property and provided for guest use (e.g., restaurant, health club, gift shop, recreational facilities) meet all appropriate AAA Approval Requirements.

Guest Rooms
Each guest unit will have:

18. A clean and comfortable bed with a mattress pad, two sheets, two pillows with pillowcases, and an appropriate bed covering.

19. A nightstand or equivalent by each bed, a chair, a writing surface, a waste container, drawers/shelving and clothes-hanging facilities.

20. Adequate shades, drapes, blinds or treatments to cover all windows or other transparent areas to provide guest privacy.

21. An adequate level of soundproofing to muffle exterior sounds.

22. An active light switch at the main entry.

23. Good overall illumination to include direct lighting at a writing surface and at each bed.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 9 225 of 446

24. Exterior/hallway facing door(s) equipped with a functional primary lock and a secondary deadbolt lock.

25. Working deadbolt lock(s) on each door to connecting guest units or maintenance corridors.

26. A viewport or window (convenient to the door) for each entry door.

27. A working lock for each window in a ground floor unit.

28. A working smoke detector.

Guest Bathrooms
Each guest unit will have:

29. A private bathroom solely dedicated for use by the guest(s).

30. A toilet, sink with adequate shelf space, mirror, convenient electrical outlet and a tub/shower with a non-slip surface.

31. Good overall illumination to include direct lighting at the mirror(s).

32. Two bath towels, two hand towels, two face cloths and two cups/glasses.

33. Toilet tissue, a cloth bath mat, and two bars of soap or equivalent.

34. Non-porous surfaces (e.g., floors, walls, baseboards) in all toilet areas.

Approval Requirements and Diamond Rating Guidelines – what’s the difference? AAA’s Diamond Rating System comprises two distinct components. The Approval Requirements are uncompromising, mandatory standards that result in one of two outcomes: pass or fail. The Diamond Rating Guidelines, applied only to properties that meet the Approval Requirements, are somewhat flexible. The overall rating is based on a prevalence of expected attributes and the inspector’s professional judgment in the context of thousands of property inspections.

Properties must meet all AAA Approval Requirements to be designated AAA Inspected & Approved.

Approval Requirements are common-sense qualifications AAA/CAA members say are essential to their satisfaction and professional operators routinely seek to achieve.

Properties must meet most AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines for a particular level to be assigned that rating.

The Diamond Rating Guidelines reflect attributes typically — but not universally — observed throughout a lodging industry segment. Therefore, the lack of some components listed for a designated rating level does not necessarily preclude the achievement of that rating. During evaluations, inspectors assess each attribute of the property and assign the most appropriate rating that will provide the best match in meeting AAA member expectations.

Not all guidelines apply to all property types. For example, meeting rooms are not expected at a bed and breakfast, but are essential at a convention-oriented hotel. Additionally, downtown hotels may lack extensive landscaping Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 10 Primary lock is a keyed mechanism that allows the door to be locked from the outside. Passkeys are strictly controlled and available only to recognized guests and essential associates for routine room access (e.g., management, housekeeping/ maintenance staff, security).

Secondary lock is a mortised, deadbolt-locking mechanism with a one-inch throw extending from the edge of the door into the door frame. This extra device affords guests a certain level of privacy. Unlike the primary lock passkeys, master keys for secondary locks are available only to essential associates and only for emergency purposes (e.g., management or security).

Secondary Lock Variances
In certain instances, the requirement for secondary locks may be modified to allow exceptions or provide increased guest security. The most common are noted below. AAA claims the right of final arbitrator in all decisions related to locks.

Sliding Glass Doors – Each sliding door must be equipped with an effective locking device. An effective secondary security lock is required on all ground-floor doors and those accessible from common walkways and adjoining balconies.

French Doors – In addition to the deadbolt lock, surface-mounted slide bolts must be installed at the top and bottom to secure the stationary/auxiliary door. These bolts must extend into the upper doorframe and the lower doorframe or floor and must be strong and sturdy mechanisms.
226 of 446
features in comparison to what is typical in more rural locations. AAA inspectors apply only those Diamond Rating Guidelines applicable for the property classification.

PART 3: Achieve Your AAA Diamond Rating
The AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines

AAA DIAMOND RATINGS FOR LODGINGS REPRESENT A COMBINATION OF THE OVERALL QUALITY, RANGE OF FACILITIES, AND LEVEL OF HOSPITALITY OFFERED BY A PROPERTY. The widely recognized and trusted AAA Diamonds help members choose lodgings that will meet their needs and expectations.

AAA's Diamond Rating Guidelines indicate what is typically found at each rating level — from simple economy to highly personalized luxury. The Diamond Rating is determined based on a compilation of all property characteristics, with a focus on the overall guest experience rather than on individual elements. While properties at the same rating level may have variations in the attributes offered, a predominance of characteristics from a particular rating level drives the rating.

The inspector’s Diamond Rating recommendation is based on both the Diamond Rating Guidelines and professional judgment — an essential component of the rating assessment. Our inspectors are North America’s travel experts, immersed in the hospitality industry on a daily basis as they conduct more than 29,000 lodging inspections per year.

What the Diamonds Mean
One Diamond
Budget-oriented, offering basic comfort and hospitality.

Two Diamond
Affordable, with modestly enhanced facilities, décor and amenities.

Three Diamond
Distinguished, multifaceted with enhanced physical attributes, amenities and guest comforts.

Four Diamond
Refined, stylish with upscale physical attributes, extensive amenities and a high degree of hospitality, service and attention to detail.

Five Diamond
Ultimate luxury, sophistication and comfort with extraordinary physical attributes, meticulous personalized service, extensive amenities and impeccable standard of excellence.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 11 227 of 446
Glossary
When you see the following terms used in the following Diamond Rating Guidelines pages, please refer back to this page for more information.
• Basic – Of, relating to, or forming the base or essence; simplest form; minimal amounts. • Connective Technology/Connectivity – The integration of technology and information systems that allow guests and lodging operators to interact on an increasingly personalized and technologically connected basis. • Decorative – Obvious ornamental embellishment with attractive results. • e.g. – For example. Items following are only examples of what is typical and should not be interpreted as a required appointment.
• Leading Edge – Most advanced in their profession; luxuriant, luxury materials, highly fashionable/grand design and functionality working in sync to provide a sumptuous level of comfort. • Luxurious – Characterized by opulence, sumptuousness, or rich abundance; extremely comfortable, elegant or enjoyable.
• Modest/Modestly Enhanced – More than basic; slight enhancement; limited in size or scope. • Upscale – Obviously high grade; upmarket, luxurious feel; cohesive designs; not just the latest trend.

KEY NOTES:
• Additional Impressions – All areas may be subject to point additions/subtractions related to the subjective impressions of the inspector pertaining to comfort, design and layout, or other unique features.

Note: AAA/CAA members express significant dissatisfaction with additional non-use fees (e.g., “resort fees”, safes, microwaves, refrigerators, etc.). Free and effective internet bandwidth within the guest room is also a typical guest expectation.
• Additional Features – Some features and amenities (recreation facilities, microwaves, coffeemakers, iron, etc.) are not rated on a 1-5 Diamond scale, but are factored into the overall property rating based on availability and/or general quality according to AAA member expectations for the rating level. • Exceptions – Not all of the Diamond Rating Guidelines will apply to all property types. AAA inspectors will only use the sections of the Diamond Rating Guidelines that are appropriate for the property classification in assessing the overall Diamond Rating. If an attribute exists at the property, it will be rated accordingly.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 12 228 of 446

EXTERIOR
General Curb
Appeal
Minimal quantity,
variety and/or
coordination of basic
materials
Basic design and
effect
Increased quantity,
variety and/or
coordination of
materials
Modest design and
effect
Decorative materials
Well-coordinated and
distinctive design
Significantly enhanced
effect
Upscale materials
Substantial, cohesive
and impressive design
Upscale effect
Luxurious materials
Leading-edge design
and effect
Building Structure
& Design
Basic materials,
design and/or
function
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
and/or function
e.g., roof mansard, gable,
cupola, window
shutters/sashes, siding,
columns, railings
Significant decorative
enhancements to
materials, design
and/or function in the
most prominent
structural areas,
such as the façade
Obvious distinctive
effect
e.g., enhanced roofs,
window
treatments/moldings,
stone/veneer accents or
balconies
Upscale
enhancements
Substantial, cohesive
and impressive design
and effect throughout
the property footprint
Grand architectural
features
Leading-edge design
and effect throughout
the property footprint
Landscaping Minimal quantity,
variety of plants
and/or landscape
materials
Basic surroundings
and visual interest
Modest
enhancements to
quantity, variety of
plants and/or
landscape materials
Some surroundings
reflect a coordinated
design of moderate
visual interest
Significant, decorative
enhancements to
quantity, variety of
plants and/or
landscape materials
Overall decorative
design
Creates an obvious
visual interest in most
areas
The entire grounds
are professionally
planned and
manicured with an
extensive use of
appropriate, mature
plants and landscape
materials
Cohesive, upscale
design that
withstands seasonal
weather conditions
At least one upscale
accent feature
e.g., statuary, water
feature, serenity garden

Luxuriant landscape
materials
Leading-edge design
and effect that
withstands seasonal
weather conditions
Multiple upscale
accent features are
meticulously
integrated by design
e.g., statuary, water
feature, serenity garden
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 13 229 of 446

EXTERIOR
Main Entrance Basic materials,
design and/or
function
Covered entry door
If covered entry has
drive-through
capability, capacity is
limited to one-car
width
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
and/or function
Covered entry door
If covered entry has
drive-through
capability, capacity is
limited to one-car
width
One additional feature
e.g., bench seating,
double entry doors,
automatic entry doors,
revolving doors, entry
vestibule, enhanced
façade or driving surface
Significant decorative
enhancements to
materials, design and
function
Covered drivethrough entry
capacity is
appropriate for the
size of the lodging
(minimum two-car
width or depth)
At least three
additional features
e.g., bench seating,
double entry doors,
automatic entry doors,
revolving doors, entry
vestibule, enhanced
façade or driving surface
Upscale materials,
design
Covered drivethrough entry with
capacity greater than
two-car width and
depth
At least three
additional features
e.g., bench seating,
double entry doors,
automatic entry doors,
revolving doors, entry
vestibule, enhanced
façade or driving surface
Luxurious materials
Leading-edge design
and effect
Covered drivethrough entry with
capacity greater than
two-car width and
depth
Expanded drive or
courtyard
Additional Guest Impressions and Features
The following items are not assigned a Diamond Rating, but are factored into the overall rating of the exterior/public areas.

Location – The impression made by the location of the property, proximity to attractions or natural features.

Parking – The availability of free on-site parking for guest vehicles.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 14 230 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
General Décor Style Predominantly basic
materials, design
Minimal function
and/or coordination
Adequate level of
comfort
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
Increased function
and/or coordination
Enhanced level of
comfort
Distinctive style
Significant
enhancements to
materials, design
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality; openconcept designs that
facilitate social
interaction
Obvious degree of
comfort
Upscale materials,
design and/or
function
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality; openconcept designs that
facilitate social
interaction
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Luxurious materials
Leading-edge design
and effect
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Floor Coverings Basic materials,
design
e.g., basic linoleum/sheet
vinyl, plain ceramic tile,
painted concrete, low
density pile carpet (with
limited/no padding–floor
feels hard)
Modestly enhanced
materials
e.g., floating wood
laminates, patterned
linoleum/vinyl,
polished/stamped
concrete, carpet tiles,
medium density pile
carpet of simple
design/pattern (with
padding that provides
average comfort
underfoot)
Decorative materials
and distinctive design
with patterns,
textures or inlays
e.g., enhanced wood
laminates, engineered
wood flooring, carpet,
ceramic/stone/glass tile,
terra cotta, luxury vinyl
tile/plank
Hard-surfaced floors
have decorative area
rugs in seating areas
and other locations as
appropriate
Highest grade
materials and upscale
design with patterns,
textures or inlays
e.g., wood, marble or
other upscale stone floors,
high density pile carpet
(with padding that
provides exceptional
comfort underfoot)
Hard-surfaced floors
have upscale area
rugs in seating areas
and other locations as
appropriate
Highest grade
materials with custom
inlays or textured
enhancements
e.g., wood, marble or
other upscale stone floors,
high density pile carpet
(with padding that
provides exceptional
comfort underfoot)
Leading-edge design
and effect
Area rugs are
luxurious
Free Floor Space Obviously restricted
by size and/or
placement of
appointments
Modest restrictions
due to size and/or
placement of
appointments
No restrictions, as
placement of
appointments is wellproportioned to area
size and traffic flow
Area size and
placement of
appointments provide
an obvious degree of
spaciousness allowing
increased ease of
movement for guests
Area size and
placement of
appointments provide
an abundance of
space that contributes
to the ultimate level
of comfort and
relaxation
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 15 231 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Furniture Quality
& Design
Basic materials,
design
Minimal function
and/or coordination
Provides an adequate
level of comfort
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
Increased function
and/or coordination
Provides an enhanced
level of comfort
Significant distinctive
enhancements to
materials, design
Well-coordinated with
increased
functionality
Provides an obvious
degree of comfort
Upscale materials
e.g., granite/stone, solid
wood, polished metals,
high-gloss lacquers,
veneer finishes with solid
wood accents, high-grade
laminate insets
Upscale design and/or
function
e.g., antiques, leather,
plush padding, designer
fabric, sculptured shape,
crisp line
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Luxurious materials
Custom workmanship
Leading-edge design
and effect
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Guest Service
Area(s)
Basic, small counter
registration
Enhanced front desk
e.g., size or design
Multiple guest service
capability
Enhanced front
desk/pods/alternative
check-in methods
Multiple guest service
capability
Part of a spacious
common area
Uniformed staff
Enhanced front
desk/pods/alternative
check-in methods
Multiple guest service
areas
e.g., front desk, bell stand,
concierge, video kiosk
Part of a spacious
common area
Uniformed staff
Enhanced front
desk/pods/alternative
check-in methods
Multiple guest service
areas
e.g., front desk, bell stand,
concierge, video kiosk
Part of a spacious
common area
Uniformed staff
Staffed concierge
area (minimum 16
hrs./day)
Illumination Basic fixtures
Good level of overall
illumination
Modestly enhanced
design, materials,
positioning and/or
function
Good level of overall
illumination
Decorative and wellcoordinated design,
materials and/or
function
Well-positioned
Good level of overall
illumination
Fixtures reflect
upscale design
Well-positioned
Excellent level of
overall illumination
enhances the
intended use of the
space
Custom fixtures of
outstanding quality
Well-positioned
Excellent level of
overall illumination
enhances the
intended use of the
space
Leading-edge
illumination effect
that provides
day/night transition
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 16 232 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Seating Layout Minimal or no capacity Expanded overall
capacity
Multipurpose hard
and soft seating
Expanded overall
capacity
Expanded capacity for
each function (soft
seating, dining,
workspaces)
Expanded overall
capacity
Expanded capacity for
each function (soft
seating, dining,
workspaces)
Multiple
conversational
groupings
One semi-private area
(away from traffic
flow)
Expanded overall
capacity
Expanded capacity for
each function (soft
seating, dining,
workspaces)
Multiple
conversational
groupings
Multiple semi-private
areas (away from
traffic flow)
Wall Coverings Basic materials,
design
e.g., drywall with basic
paint finish or plain vinyl
coverings
Rubber or vinyl
baseboards
Modest
enhancements
e.g., knockdown, orange
peel, comb, slap brush
Carpeted baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
Wood, ceramic tile or
enhanced composite
baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
One upscale design
enhancement
e.g., furniture-finish wood
planking, soft wall
coverings, crown/cove
molding, wainscot,
architectural feature
Oversize (>4”)
wood/stone
baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
Multiple design
enhancements
throughout
e.g., furniture-finish wood
planking, soft wall
coverings, crown/cove
molding, wainscot,
architectural feature
Oversize (>4”)
wood/stone
baseboards
Leading-edge effect
Decorative
Enhancements
Poster(s) or common
artwork with
unframed/thin,
un-enhanced wood,
metal, or plastic
frame(s)
Common knickknacks
Common artwork
with enhanced
frame(s) -Or- other
modest appointments
e.g., live plants, floral
displays, prints, assorted
pieces, sculptures, accent
wall, water features,
fireplace
Well-coordinated,
decorative framed
artwork or
appointments that
provide distinctive
appeal
e.g., live plants, floral
displays, prints, assorted
pieces, sculptures, accent
wall, water features,
fireplace
Well-coordinated,
decorative framed
artwork or
appointments
Varied assortment
that provides a
thematic upscale
appeal
e.g., live plants, floral
displays, prints, assorted
pieces, sculptures, accent
wall, water features,
fireplace
Well-coordinated,
decorative framed
artwork or
appointments
Varied assortment
that provides a
thematic upscale
appeal
Variety of styles and
accent pieces
e.g., custom artwork,
limited edition prints,
canvas art, tapestries, or
lithographs with
enhanced matting and
preservation frames,
assorted artisan pieces,
sculptures
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 17 233 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Connective
Technology
Basic level of
connectivity to
include wireless
internet access
Wireless internet
access available
throughout the
property
e.g., multiple routers,
consistent signal strength
Convenient electrical
outlets
Workspaces with
printing capability
Wireless internet
access available
throughout the
property
e.g., multiple routers,
consistent signal strength
Convenient electrical
outlets
Workspaces with USB
or other alternative
charging capability
Remote access
printing capability
Additional
connectivity options
e.g., interactive electronic
reader board with local
information, boarding
pass kiosk, device
available for electronic
check-in/check-out, RFID
keys, mobile device check
in
Superior internet
speed and capacity
available throughout
the property
e.g., multiple routers,
consistent signal strength
Remote guest service
access through mobile
device
Remote access
printing capability
One additional
technology feature
e.g., mobile device room
key access, wireless
charging systems,
advanced business
computing equipment
Superior internet
speed and capacity
available throughout
the property
e.g., multiple routers,
consistent signal strength
Advanced guest
connectivity capability
across all guest
interactions (front
desk, bell service,
concierge,
maintenance, food
and beverage,
housekeeping,
recreation)
One additional
technology feature
e.g., mobile device room
key access, wireless
charging systems,
advanced business
computing equipment
Leading-edge
technology
Elevator Elevator is available
for guest use in all
multi-story buildings
Basic elevator with no
enhancement
Elevator is available
for guest use in all
multi-story buildings
Landing includes
at least one accent
feature
e.g., chair/sofa, table,
lamps/wall sconce, phone,
artwork, mirror,
flowers/plants
Elevator is available
for guest use in all
multi-story buildings
Elevator includes
decorative
appointments
Landing includes
multiple accent
features
e.g., chair/sofa, table,
lamps/wall sconce, phone,
artwork, mirror,
flowers/plants
Multiple elevators
Upscale appointments
Landings are recessed
and include multiple
accent features
e.g., chair/sofa, table,
lamps/wall sconce, phone,
artwork, mirror,
flowers/plants
Additional service
elevator is available
for staff use
Multiple elevators
Elevator cabs have
additional features
e.g., high speed,
destination dispatch, dual
call button panels,
television, music, card key
access, voice indicators
Landings are recessed
and include multiple
accent features
e.g., chair/sofa, table,
lamps/wall sconce, phone,
artwork, mirror,
flowers/plants
Additional service
elevator is available
for staff use
Leading-edge effect
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 18 234 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Exercise Facility Not available Designated room on
site
Three pieces of
cardio/strength
equipment
Mirrors
Television
Water cooler
Towels
Clock
Sanitizer
Designated room on
site
Four or more pieces of
professional grade
equipment
Mirrors
Television
Water cooler
Towels
Clock
Sanitizer
Additional personal
training options
e.g., free weights,
benches, floor mats,
physio balls, toning
bars/rollers
Specialized, highimpact flooring
Multiple televisions or
individual televisions
for each piece of
cardio equipment
One additional
amenity
e.g., infused water,
bottled water, chilled
towels, aromatherapy
scents, ear buds, fresh
fruit
Upscale facility
Full array of state-ofthe-art fitness
equipment
appropriate with
room count
Provides an obvious
degree of
spaciousness
Additional personal
training options
e.g., free weights, benches,
floor mats, physio balls,
toning bars/rollers
Specialized, highimpact flooring
Multiple televisions or
Individual televisions
for each piece of
cardio equipment
Three or more
additional amenities
e.g., infused water,
bottled water, chilled
towels, aromatherapy
scents, ear buds, fresh
fruit
Leading-edge facility
Full array of state-ofthe-art fitness
equipment
appropriate with
room count
Provides an obvious
degree of
spaciousness
Luxurious health club
environment with
attendants
Personal training
options / guided
programs
In-room exercise
programs available
Specialized, highimpact flooring
Multiple televisions or
Individual televisions
for each piece of
cardio equipment
Comprehensive array
of amenities
Dressing area includes
lockers, showers and
restrooms
Athletic gear available
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 19 235 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Food & Beverage
Outlets
Restaurant
OR
One quick-service
outlet on site
i.e., comparable to a One
Diamond restaurant
OR

One full-service
restaurant
i.e., comparable to a Two
Diamond restaurant
Lounge or bar area
Grab-and-go option
available
OR

Upscale, full-service
restaurant
i.e., comparable to a Three
Diamond restaurant
Separate lounge or
bar area
Room service
available for
breakfast, lunch and
dinner
OR

Multiple outlets
including an upscale,
full-service restaurant
i.e., at least one is
comparable to a Four
Diamond restaurant
Separate lounge or
bar area
Room service
available 24/7
OR

Breakfast Area Standard continental
breakfast
minimum: juice, pastry,
and hot beverage
Expanded breakfast
including at least one
hot item.
e.g., waffles/pancakes,
eggs, breakfast meats
Dedicated area with
modest restrictions
due to size and/or
placement of
appointments
Limited seating is
available
Television
Expanded breakfast
includes multiple hot
items
e.g., waffles/pancakes,
eggs, breakfast meats
Appointments are
well-proportioned to
area size, with
appropriate seating
for the size of the
establishment
Television
Clearly refined menu
Full service
Upscale surroundings
Appointments are
well-proportioned to
area size, with
appropriate seating
for the size of the
establishment
Television
Not applicable
Meeting Rooms Not available Small (size of one to
two guest rooms)
Expanded meeting
space
Decorative
appointments
Comprehensive
facility
Ample variety of
meeting rooms
e.g., ballroom,
boardroom, theater,
and/or meeting rooms of
various sizes
Upscale appointments
Comprehensive
facility
Latest technology
Ample variety of
meeting rooms
e.g., ballroom,
boardroom, theater,
and/or meeting rooms of
various sizes
Luxuriously
appointed, first-class
facilities
Leading-edge effect
Comprehensive facility
Latest technology
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 20 236 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Restrooms Not available Restroom available Decorative
appointments
Multiple restrooms in
a convenient location
(If property has expanded
meeting facilities, then
additional restrooms are
available in proportion)
Upscale appointments
Multiple restrooms in
a convenient location
(If property has expanded
meeting facilities, then
additional restrooms are
available in proportion)
Multiple locations
First-class with
luxurious appointments
Multiple restrooms in a
convenient location
(If property has expanded
meeting facilities, then
additional restrooms are
available in proportion)
Multiple locations
Signage
Throughout
Property
Basic materials,
design
Limited locations
Modestly enhanced
materials, design
Limited locations
Decorative materials,
design enhancements
Ample locations
Intuitive, upscale
materials, design and
location
Ample locations
Custom materials,
Intuitive design
Creatively placed for a
leading-edge effect
Ample locations
Sundries & Shops Not available Modest selection of
amenities available at
the front desk
OR
In vending machine
e.g., toothbrush/paste,
razors, mouthwash,
shower caps, combs
Dedicated sundry area
OR
Conventional gift
shop offering a
moderate variety of
merchandise
e.g., health and beauty
items, food, beverage,
basic technology
accessories and reading
materials
Upscale gift shop
providing a wide
variety of
merchandise
OR
Property is
conveniently
connected to
shopping area
Variety of first-class
shops
OR
Property is
conveniently
connected to
shopping area
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 21 237 of 446

PUBLIC AREAS
Swimming Pool Not available Pool area reflects the
use of modest
materials and design
Limited amount of
furniture in simple or
mixed styles
Well-appointed with
decorative features
and enhanced design
Good variety of
comfortable,
coordinated pool
furniture
Well-appointed with
upscale materials and
design
Good variety of
comfortable,
coordinated pool
furniture
Includes at least one
additional feature
e.g., hot tub, whirlpool
spa, steam room, sauna,
fountain, waterfall, zeroentry, infinity edge,
children’s splash pad,
kiddie pool, water slide
Food and beverage
service is available
poolside
Luxurious materials
Leading-edge
appointments
e.g., in-pool seating,
sculptures, water feature,
exotic plants and gardens,
stone/tile surfaces with
designer inlays
Good variety of
upscale pool furniture
Includes at least one
additional feature
e.g., hot tub, whirlpool
spa, steam room, sauna,
fountain, waterfall, zeroentry, infinity edge,
children’s splash pad,
kiddie pool
Additional poolside
amenities
e.g., cabanas, Bali beds,
umbrellas, lotions, food
and beverage outlet
Attendants on duty
Food and beverage
service is available
poolside
Additional Guest Impressions and Features
The following items are not assigned a Diamond Rating, but are factored into the overall rating of the exterior/public areas.

Ceilings – The impression made by the quality of ceiling finishes in the public areas.

Additional Recreational Facilities/Programs – The availability of substantial on-site recreational facilities.

Spa – The availability of on-site spa facilities.

Resort / Non-use Fee(s) – A detraction for the automatic collection of separate fees for facilities, amenities or services regardless of guest use.

Overall Impression – The overall subjective impression of the exterior and public spaces.

Other – The general impression made by the design, layout or other standout features.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 22 238 of 446

GUEST ROOMS
General Décor Style Predominantly basic
materials, design
Minimal function
and/or coordination
Adequate level of
comfort
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
Increased function
and/or coordination
Enhanced level of
comfort
Significant
enhancements to
materials, design
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality
Obvious degree of
comfort
Comprehensive
design reflecting
streamlined, trendy,
contemporary or
traditional styles
Upscale materials,
design and/or
function
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Luxurious materials
Leading-edge design
and effect
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Bed / Bedding Basic materials,
design (headboard,
bed base, mattress
and bed covering)
Bed linens are of
common blends,
thread counts (sheer,
coarse to touch,
quilted spreads)
Pillows are of a
standard grade (thin
polyester batting)
Modestly enhanced
materials, design
(headboard, bed base,
mattress and bed
covering)
e.g., quilted or soft top
mattress, duvet
Bed linens are smooth
to touch
Pillows are of an
enhanced grade (thick
cluster fiber)
Decorative headboard
e.g., upholstered, multiple
textures, shelving, reading
lights, oversize mural
Mattress includes
comfort enhancement
e.g., pillow top, foam
padding
Bed linens are smooth
to touch
Pillows are of an
enhanced grade (thick
cluster fiber)
Three accent features
to bed linens
e.g., triple sheeting,
overstuffed duvet,
skirting, wrapped box
spring, bed throw/scarf,
multiple pillows,
embroidered pillow
cases/shams
Upscale materials
Oversize or custom
made headboard, bed
base, mattress
Bed linens are very
soft to the touch and
tightly woven
Pillows are of an
upscale grade
e.g., down, natural
memory fibers, hypoallergenic, gel
Three accent features
to bed linens
e.g., triple sheeting,
overstuffed duvet,
skirting, wrapped box
spring, bed throw/scarf,
multiple pillows,
embroidered pillow
cases/shams
Luxurious materials
Leading-edge effect
Bed linens have a
luxuriously soft, silklike feel
Pillows are of an
upscale grade
e.g., down, natural
memory fibers, hypoallergenic, gel
Three accent features
to bed linens
e.g., triple sheeting,
overstuffed duvet,
skirting, wrapped box
spring, bed throw/scarf,
multiple pillows,
embroidered pillow
cases/shams
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 23 239 of 446

GUEST ROOMS
Floor Coverings Basic materials,
design
e.g., basic linoleum/sheet
vinyl, plain ceramic tile,
painted concrete, low
density pile carpet (with
limited/no padding—
floor feels hard)
Modestly enhanced
materials
e.g., floating wood
laminates, patterned
linoleum/vinyl,
polished/stamped
concrete, carpet tiles,
medium density pile
carpet of simple
design/pattern (with
padding that provides
average comfort
underfoot)
Decorative materials
and distinctive design
with patterns,
textures or inlays
e.g., enhanced wood
laminates, engineered
wood flooring, carpet,
ceramic/stone/glass tile,
terra cotta, luxury vinyl
tile/plank
Hard-surfaced floors
have decorative area
rugs in seating areas
and other locations as
appropriate
Highest grade
materials and upscale
design with patterns,
textures or inlays
e.g., wood, marble or
other upscale stone floors,
high density pile carpet
(with padding that
provides exceptional
comfort underfoot)
Hard-surfaced floors
have upscale area
rugs in seating areas
and other locations as
appropriate
Highest grade
materials with custom
inlays or textured
enhancements
e.g., wood, marble or
other upscale stone floors,
high density pile carpet
(with padding that
provides exceptional
comfort underfoot)
Leading-edge design
and effect
Hardwood or fine
quality tile/stone
surface at entry
Area rugs are
luxurious
Free Floor Space Obviously restricted
by size and/or
placement of
appointments
Modest restrictions
due to size and/or
placement of
appointments
No restrictions, as
placement of
appointments is wellproportioned to room
size and traffic flow
Room size and
placement of
appointments provide
an obvious degree of
spaciousness allowing
increased ease of
movement for
multiple guests
Room size and
placement of
appointments provide
an abundance of
space that contributes
to the ultimate level
of comfort, privacy
and relaxation for
multiple guests
Furniture Quality
& Design
Basic materials,
design
Minimal function
and/or coordination
Adequate level of
comfort
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
Increased function
and/or coordination
Enhanced level of
comfort
Significant distinctive
enhancements to
materials, design
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality
Obvious degree of
comfort
Upscale materials
e.g., granite/stone, solid
wood, polished metals,
high-gloss lacquers,
veneer finishes with solid
wood accents, high-grade
laminate insets
Upscale design and/or
function
e.g., antiques, leather,
plush padding, designer
fabric, sculptured shape,
crisp line
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Luxurious materials
Custom workmanship
Leading-edge design
and effect
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 24 240 of 446

GUEST ROOMS
Illumination ≥ Three lighting
fixtures reflect basic
materials, design
and/or functionality
Good level of overall
illumination
≥ Three lighting
fixtures reflect
modest
enhancements to
materials, design,
functionality and/or
placement
Good level of overall
illumination
≥ Four lighting
fixtures reflect
decorative materials,
design
Well-positioned from
multiple sources
Good level of overall
illumination at each
key task area
≥ Four lighting
fixtures reflect
upscale materials,
design
Well-positioned from
multiple sources
Superior functionality
provides for ambience
options
e.g., dimmers, point
lighting, multiple
switches, remote control
and/or natural light
sources
Excellent level of
overall illumination
≥ Four custom lighting
fixtures of
outstanding quality
Well-positioned from
multiple sources
Superior functionality
provides for ambience
options
e.g., dimmers, point
lighting, multiple
switches, remote control
and/or natural light
sources
Excellent level of
overall illumination
Leading-edge
illumination effect
Mirror Less than full length Full-length mirror
Unframed/beveled
OR
Simple metal/wood
frame
Full-length mirror
Decorative
frame/design
enhancement
Full-length mirror
Upscale frame/design
enhancement
Multiple locations
Full-length mirror
Custom frame/design
enhancement
e.g., luxurious materials,
artistic design, oversized,
multiple viewing angles
Multiple locations
Seating Layout One chair
Adequate level of
comfort
Seating for two
guests
Enhanced level of
comfort
Seating for two
guests
Enhanced desk chair
(ergonomic or
coordinated with
décor)
Chair positioned for
television viewing
Additional
multifunctional
seating option
Obvious degree of
comfort
Seating for three
guests
e.g., loveseat, sofa or two
chairs (in addition to desk
chair)
Enhanced desk chair
(ergonomic or
coordinated with
décor)
Chair positioned for
television viewing
Additional
multifunctional
seating option
One additional
furniture piece
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Seating for three
guests
e.g., loveseat, sofa or two
chairs (in addition to desk
chair)
Enhanced desk chair
(ergonomic or
coordinated with
décor)
Furniture layout
clearly designed for
small grouping
Two additional
furniture pieces
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 25 241 of 446

GUEST ROOMS
Hang Space for
Clothing
Open wall-mounted
clothes rack
Basic wire,
plastic/nondetachable hangers
Drawers/shelving
available
Recessed area or
modestly enhanced,
freestanding armoire
Detachable wood or
heavy metal/plastic
hangers
Drawers/shelving
available
Fully enclosed area or
enhanced quality
freestanding armoire
Closet can enclose
full-length apparel
Matching, open-hook,
wood/sculptured
plastic hangers (heavy
gauge with metal
hook)
Some with skirt or
pant hanging
attachments
Ample supply (for two
guests)
Upscale quality
enclosure
Closet can enclose fulllength apparel
Matching, open-hook,
wood/sculptured
plastic hangers (heavy
gauge with metal
hook)
Some with skirt or pant
hanging attachments
Ample supply (for two
guests)
Two or more additional
features
e.g., illumination,
drawers, shoe rack, walkin capability, two or more
shelves, upgraded luggage
racks/designer style
benches
Upscale quality
enclosure
Closet can enclose
full-length apparel
Comprehensive
selection of hangers
for ≥ three guests
At least two satin
hangers
Closet is illuminated
Three or more
additional features
e.g., illumination,
drawers, shoe rack, walkin capability, two or more
shelves, upgraded luggage
racks/designer style
benches
Television Type
& Placement
≤ 32-inch screen > 32-inch flat-panel
Channel directory
Two additional
features
e.g., all-in-one multimedia
hub, high-definition
channels, free/pay movie
channels, digital
art/property information,
mood effects, multiple
viewing angles, acoustic
board, smart TV
functionality, streaming
capability, surround
sound
≥ 40-inch flat-panel
Channel directory
Cables and cords are
hidden from view
Three additional
features
e.g., all-in-one multimedia
hub, high-definition
channels, free/pay movie
channels, digital
art/property information,
mood effects, multiple
viewing angles, acoustic
board, smart TV
functionality, streaming
capability, surround
sound
≥ 43-inch flat-panel
Channel directory
Cables and cords are
hidden from view
Four additional
features
e.g., all-in-one multimedia
hub, high-definition
channels, free/pay movie
channels, digital
art/property information,
mood effects, multiple
viewing angles, acoustic
board, smart TV
functionality, streaming
capability, surround
sound
> 43-inch flat-panel
Seamlessly integrated
with room design
Channel directory
Cables and cords are
hidden from view
Five additional
features
e.g., all-in-one multimedia
hub, high-definition
channels, free/pay movie
channels, digital
art/property information,
mood effects, multiple
viewing angles, acoustic
board, smart TV
functionality, streaming
capability, surround
sound
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 26 242 of 446

GUEST ROOMS
Work Space /
Writing Surface
(A work space /
writing surface is
judged on the basis of
available space)
Minimal area
e.g., small wall-mounted
writing surface or small
task table
Medium-size desk or
task table
Large-size desk, task
table or alternative
work/writing surface
Electrical outlet and
USB port at desktop
(for guest use)
Large-size desk, task
table or alternative
work/writing surface
Multiple electrical
outlets and USB ports
at desktop
Large-size desk, task
table or alternative
work/writing surface
Multiple electrical
outlets and USB ports
at desktop
Work space is
appropriately
enhanced by unique
style/design
Uncluttered, with
efficient functionality
Ventilation Window style airconditioning units
Heat and/or air
conditioning available
on a seasonal basis as
needed
Heat and air
conditioning available
on demand
Conveniently located
through-wall HVAC
units
Easily accessible
controls
Conveniently located
through-wall HVAC
units
Modern and quiet
Digital thermostat
control on wall
Central system
Digital thermostat
control on wall
Central system
Quiet and
inconspicuous form
and function
Digital thermostat
control on wall
Wall Coverings Basic materials,
design
e.g., drywall with basic
paint finish or plain vinyl
coverings
Rubber or vinyl
baseboards
Modest
enhancements
e.g., knockdown, orange
peel, comb, slap brush
Carpeted baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
Wood, ceramic tile or
enhanced composite
baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
One upscale design
enhancement
e.g., furniture-finish wood
planking, soft wall
coverings, crown/cove
molding, wainscot,
architectural feature
Oversize (>4”)
wood/stone
baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
Multiple design
enhancements
e.g., furniture-finish wood
planking, soft wall
coverings, crown/cove
molding, wainscot,
architectural feature
Leading-edge effect
Oversize (>4”)
wood/stone
baseboards
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 27 243 of 446

GUEST ROOMS
Decorative
Enhancements
Poster(s) or common
artwork with
unframed/thin,
un-enhanced wood,
metal, or plastic
frame(s)
Common knickknacks
Common artwork
with enhanced
frame(s) -Or- other
modest appointments
e.g., live plants, floral
displays, prints, assorted
pieces, sculptures, accent
wall, water features,
fireplace
Well-coordinated,
decorative framed
artwork or
appointments that
provide distinctive
appeal
Well-coordinated,
upscale framed
artwork or
appointments
Varied assortment of
styles and accent
pieces that provide a
thematic upscale
appeal
Well-coordinated,
luxurious framed
artwork or
appointments
Varied assortment of
styles and accent
pieces that provide a
leading edge or
luxurious appeal
e.g., custom artwork,
limited edition prints,
canvas art, tapestries, or
lithographs with enhanced
matting and preservation
frames, assorted artisan
pieces, sculptures
Window Coverings Basic window
covering provides for
guest privacy
Modestly enhanced
materials, design or
function
e.g., blackout effect,
blinds, full-length drapes,
shutters, sheers, fabric
side panels, rods with
finials, valance, glass
treatment, cornice
Decorative
enhancements to
design
e.g., blackout effect,
blinds, full-length drapes,
shutters, sheers, fabric
side panels, rods with
finials, valance, glass
treatment, cornice
The overall
treatments are
upscale and provide a
significant visual
interest
Custom design,
luxurious materials
Leading-edge effect
e.g., power operation,
special tinting or effect
Additional Guest Impressions and Features
The following items are not assigned a Diamond Rating, but are factored into the overall rating of the guest room.

Ceilings – The impression made by the quality of ceiling finishes in the guest room.

Technology – The impression made by the technology features in the guest room.

Coffee/Tea – The quality, presentation and selection of coffee/tea, equipment, cups and condiments.

Microwave – A microwave oven is present in each guest room.

Refrigerator – A refrigerator is present in each guest room.

Guest Information – The availability and presentation of information on the property and guest services.

Iron & Board – A full-size iron and board are present in each guest room, or quick pressing service is offered.

Robes – A robe is present in each guest room (two in doubles).

Slippers – A set of slippers is present in each guest room (two sets in doubles).

Safe – A safe is present in each guest room.

Internet – Wireless internet access in guest rooms is offered free, or at an additional cost.

Overall Impression – The overall subjective impression of the guest rooms.

Other – The general impression made by the design, layout, or other standout features.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 28 244 of 446

BATHROOMS
General Décor Style Predominantly basic
materials, design
Minimal function
and/or coordination
Adequate level of
comfort
Modest
enhancements to
materials, design
Increased function
and/or coordination
Enhanced level of
comfort
Significant
enhancements to
materials, design
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality
Obvious degree of
comfort
Comprehensive
design reflecting
streamlined, trendy,
contemporary or
traditional styles
Upscale materials,
design and/or
function
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Luxurious materials
Well-coordinated,
with increased
functionality to
provide leading-edge
design and effect
Exceptional degree of
comfort
Counter/ Shelf
Space; Available
Basic materials,
design
e.g., glass shelving, metal,
or sheet laminate
Modestly-enhanced
materials, design
e.g., poured acrylic,
cultured marble/granite,
ceramic tile
≥ 3 sq. ft.

Decorative materials,
design
e.g., quartz, granite
≥6 sq. ft.

Upscale materials,
design
e.g., marble or other solid
stone
≥ 8 sq. ft.

Multiple counters
and/or shelves
Upscale materials,
design
e.g., marble or other solid
stone
≥ 8 sq. ft.

Multiple counters
and/or shelves
Leading-edge effect
Floor Coverings Basic materials,
design
e.g., basic linoleum/sheet
vinyl, painted concrete
Modestly enhanced
materials, design
e.g., ceramic tile,
patterned linoleum/vinyl
Decorative materials
and design with
patterns, textures or
inlays
e.g., enhanced wood
laminates, engineered
wood flooring,
ceramic/stone/glass tile,
polished/stamped
concrete, terra cotta,
luxury vinyl tile/plank
Highest grade
materials and upscale
design
e.g., solid wood, antique
reclaimed tiles, pebble
mosaics, marble,
granite/other upscale
stone floors
Area rug(s) as
appropriate

Highest grade
materials
e.g., solid wood, antique
reclaimed tiles, pebble
mosaics, marble,
granite/other upscale
stone floors
Luxurious area rug(s)
as appropriate
Custom inlays or
textured
enhancements
Leading-edge design
and effect
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 29 245 of 446

BATHROOMS
Free Floor Space Obviously restricted
by size and/or
placement of
appointments
Modest restrictions
due to size and/or
placement of
appointments
(If vanity area is separate
from the toilet area, it is
positioned in plain view of
the guest room)
No restrictions, as
placement of
appointments is wellproportioned to room
size and traffic flow
(If vanity area is separate
from the toilet area, it is
positioned in restricted
view from the rest of the
guest room)
Room size and
placement of
appointments provide
an obvious degree of
spaciousness,
allowing increased
ease of movement
Room size and
placement of
appointments provide
an abundance of
space that contributes
to the ultimate level
of comfort and
relaxation for multiple
guests
Illumination Basic lighting fixtures
e.g., box/egg crate style,
Hollywood bulbs
Modestly enhanced
lighting fixtures
e.g., enhanced plastic
cover, tube lighting
Decorative lighting
fixtures
Multiple locations
Upscale design and
materials
Multiple locations
Illuminated shower
Excellent level of
overall illumination at
each location
Upscale design and
materials
Multiple locations
Illuminated shower
Custom function(s)
provides for ambience
options
e.g., dimmers, point
lighting, multiple
switches, and/or natural
light sources
Leading-edge
illumination effect
Mirror Basic materials,
design
Modest design/size
enhancement
e.g., framed, beveled,
etched
Proportionately sized
Decoratively
framed/designed
e.g., floating, illuminated
Proportionately sized
Upscale materials,
design
Makeup mirror
Upscale materials,
design
Leading-edge effect
e.g., television, defogger
Illuminated makeup
mirror
Personal Care
(If eco-friendly options
exist, dispensers must
coordinate with
General Décor Style as
described previously)
Two small-size bars of
soap (or equivalent)
One packet or bottled
item
Two medium-size bars
of soap (or
equivalent)
Two bottled items
Multi-piece personal
care package includes:
• Two large-size bars
of soap
• Three bottled items
Decorative
presentation
Multi-piece personal
care package includes:
• Two large-size bars
of soap
• Four bottled items
• Two additional
items
Enhanced by
fragrance, natural
supplement,
packaging, etc.

Upscale presentation
Comprehensive and
luxurious selection of
fashionable bath
products
Ample-size bars of
soap and bottled
items
Leading-edge effect
Scale
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 30 246 of 446

BATHROOMS
Shower
Curtain/Door
Basic materials,
design
e.g., plastic or vinyl
curtain
Modest materials,
design enhancement
Lightweight curtain
e.g., vinyl/polyester
Or- lightweight glass
door with aluminum
frame
Decorative materials,
design
Double curtain
-Or- glass door with
aluminum frame
-Or- door-less design
Upscale materials,
design
e.g., linen texture, hemp,
cotton/cotton-poly blend
Double curtain
-Or- heavyweight glass
door with/without
metal frame
-Or- door-less design
Leading-edge effect
Double curtain
-Or- heavyweight glass
door with/without
metal frame
Additional luxury
enhancement
(etched, frosted,
embossed, tinted,
upscale custom
hardware, etc.)
Shower Fixtures Metal or plastic
Basic design, single
function
Metal or plastic
Adjustable settings
Decorative materials,
design and enhanced
function
e.g., rain showerhead,
oversize wall-mounted
showerhead, massage
feature
Upscale materials,
design
One custom water
feature
e.g., body jets, hand-held
sprayers, multiple
showerheads, oversize
ceiling rain shower, panel
systems, steam shower
Upscale materials,
design
Multiple custom
water features
e.g., body jets, hand-held
sprayers, multiple
showerheads, oversize
ceiling rain shower, panel
systems, steam shower
Sink Basic materials,
design
Wall-mounted
(no base)
Modest enhancement
to materials, design
Wall-mounted, vanity
style
Self-rimming
porcelain/porcelain on
steel
-Or- seamless poured
acrylic or cultured
marble/granite
Decorative materials,
design
e.g., under-mounted,
pedestal, vessel
Upscale materials
and/or functionality
e.g., glass, stainless steel,
colored vitreous china,
brass, nickel, copper,
marble, real/synthetic
stone
Upscale materials
and/or functionality
e.g., glass, stainless steel,
colored vitreous china,
brass, nickel, copper,
marble, real/synthetic
stone
Multiple sinks
Toilet Basic design
Two-piece, round
(with/without lid)
Two-piece, elongated
(with lid)
Two-piece, elongated
(with lid)
Decorative design
enhancement
Upscale design
-Or- increased
functionality
Recessed area
Upscale design
-Or- increased
functionality
Enclosed toilet-only
area
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 31 247 of 446

BATHROOMS
Towels Basic, lightweight
Rough to touch
Low absorbency
Displayed on caddies
Modest
enhancements in
design, lightweight
Rough to touch
Low absorbency
Displayed on bars
and/or shelves
Modest
enhancements in
design, medium
weight
Soft to touch
Medium absorbency
Displayed on bars
and/or shelves
Upscale design,
heavyweight
Plush to touch
Firm, self-supporting
feel
Premium cotton with
high absorbency
Luxurious
appearance, with
intricate and detailed
enhancements to
design
Heavyweight
Plush to touch
Firm, self-supporting
feel
Premium cotton with
high absorbency
Generous-size towels
or bath sheets
Tub
(If available)
Basic materials
e.g., fiberglass, acrylic,
porcelain on steel
Straight sided
rectangular design
< 5 ft. length
-Or- one-piece
fiberglass tub and
shower surround
combination
Basic materials
e.g., fiberglass, acrylic,
porcelain on steel
Standard size (5 ft.
length x 2.5 ft. width)
Decoratively
enhanced materials,
design
Standard size (5 ft.
length x 2.5 ft. width)
Upscale materials,
design
e.g., oversize (> 5ft. length
x 2.5 ft. width), oval,
round/free form
And/or enhanced
functionality
e.g., water jets, handheld
sprayer
Upscale materials,
design
e.g., oversize (> 5ft. length
x 2.5 ft. width), oval,
round/free form
And/or enhanced
functionality
e.g., water jets, handheld
sprayer
Leading-edge effect
e.g., two-person
capability, European
soaking style, contoured
back, built-in lumbar back
support
Tub / Shower
Surround
Basic materials,
design
e.g., fiberglass, metal
Modest enhancement
to materials, design
e.g., acrylic, ceramic tile,
cultured marble/granite
Decorative materials,
design
Ceramic tile/solid
surface
Tub and shower
height soap dishes
Upscale materials,
design
Solid surface
e.g., marble, granite,
stone or glass/porcelain
tiles
Tub and shower
height soap dishes
Upscale materials,
design
Solid surface
e.g., marble, granite,
stone or glass/porcelain
tiles
Leading-edge effect
Custom treatment
Integrated
seating/shelving
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 32 248 of 446

BATHROOMS
Wall Coverings Basic materials,
design
e.g., drywall with basic
paint finish or plain vinyl
coverings
Rubber or vinyl
baseboards
Modest
enhancements
e.g., knockdown, orange
peel, comb, slap brush
Tiled baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
Wood/ceramic tile or
enhanced composite
baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian plaster,
vinyl coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
One upscale design
enhancement
e.g., furniture-finish wood
planking, crown/cove
molding, wainscot,
architectural feature
Oversize (> 4”)
wood/stone
baseboards
Decorative
enhancements
e.g., expert-smooth
painted drywall,
plaster/Venetian
plaster, vinyl
coverings/wood
planks/veneers/stone,
accent wall(s)
Multiple design
enhancements
e.g., furniture-finish wood
planking, crown/cove
molding, wainscot,
architectural feature
Oversize (> 4”)
wood/stone
baseboards
Leading-edge effect
Decorative
Enhancements
One modest
appointment
One piece of
decorative artwork
-Or- other decorative
appointment
Upscale artwork
-Or- other
appointments that
provide a distinctive
or thematic upscale
appeal
Upscale artwork
-Or- other
appointments that
provide a distinctive
or thematic upscale
appeal
Variety of styles and
accent pieces
e.g., framed art, assorted
artisan pieces/sculptures,
floral displays or plants
Additional Guest Impressions and Features
The following items are not assigned a Diamond Rating, but are factored into the overall rating of the bathroom.

Ceilings – The impression made by the quality of ceiling finishes in the bathroom.

Hair Dryer – The quality, presentation and features of the hair dryer provided in the bathroom.

Night-light – A night-light is present in the bathroom.

Television – A television is present in the bathroom.

Vanity Seating – A seat with counter space and mirror are available in, or adjacent to, the bathroom.

Overall Impression – The overall subjective impression of the bathrooms.

Other – The general impression made by the design, layout, or other standout features.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 33 249 of 446
The AAA Four and Five Diamond Ratings
These prestigious ratings are achieved by a small percentage of all Approved properties — typically the most luxurious and pampering properties throughout North America. Less than one-half of one percent of AAA Inspected & Approved lodgings receive the Five Diamond Rating, while only six percent receive the Four Diamond Rating.

Establishments at these rating levels must consistently reflect upscale and extraordinary characteristics in their physical attributes and guest services.

Four and Five Diamond Service Expectations
AAA Four Diamond Properties
Properties identified by AAA as potential candidates for the Four Diamond Rating must employ competent, full-time personnel and systems to provide guests with a comprehensive level of hospitality. Key guest service interaction points are:
• PHONE OPERATIONS
• ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE
• CHECK IN/OUT
• LUGGAGE ASSISTANCE
• ROOM DELIVERY
• HOUSEKEEPING
• GENERAL / CONCIERGE SERVICES
AAA Five Diamond Properties
Properties identified by AAA as potential candidates for the Five Diamond Rating undergo multiple unannounced evaluations by a AAA inspector and a final decision by a panel of experts. Properties that receive the Five Diamond Rating are subject to rigorous on-site assessments of all guest service areas. Each section is assigned a point value based on the overall levels of competency, refinement and hospitality.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 34 250 of 446
AAA Hospitality Standards

1. Reservation Services
• Initial call to property is properly received
• Reservationist thanks caller for contacting the property or reservations office • Reservationist provides an appropriate introduction to guest • Reservationist addresses caller by name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Reservationist anticipates caller's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Reservationist provides rate structure and room availability • Reservationist provides an overview of facilities and services • Reservationist exhibits competent/accurate knowledge of all associated facilities and hours of operation • Reservationist reviews reservation request
• Reservationist exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Reservationist is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Reservationist extends an appropriate closing
• Property provides follow-up reservation confirmation in advance of arrival

2. Arrival Services
• Cars in queue are acknowledged and appropriately handled on arrival • Attendant promptly opens the car door
• Attendant extends an appropriate welcome
• Attendant provides an appropriate introduction
• Attendant confirms guest's name
• Attendant uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant explains parking procedures
• Valet parking is offered
• Attendant promptly offers to unload luggage
• Attendant explains luggage handling procedures
• Attendant provides unsolicited direction to registration area • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant or lobby greeter escorts guest to the appropriate area • Attendant extends an appropriate closing

3. Check In Services
• Attendant extends an appropriate welcome
• Attendant provides an appropriate introduction
• Attendant confirms guest's name
• Attendant addresses guest by name during initial greeting • Attendant discreetly uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant gathers and provides information in a discreet manner to protect guest security and privacy • Preregistered guests are not solicited for additional information • Attendant confirms rate and type of room
• Attendant discreetly provides room number
• Attendant provides all registration materials to the guest in a manner that is convenient for the guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Guest is escorted to room
• Attendant extends an appropriate closing
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 35 251 of 446

4. Bell Services (Check In)
• Luggage delivered before guest, with guest escort or within five minutes of guest’s initial arrival to room • Attendant extends an appropriate greeting
• Attendant uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant takes the initiative in providing property information • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant places luggage on luggage stand or in appropriate area • Attendant explains features and functions of room, including technology and connectivity features • Attendant offers to fill ice bucket
• Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant extends an appropriate closing

5. Evening Housekeeping Services
• Attendant folds back or removes bedding as appropriate • Attendant straightens bathroom
• Attendant refolds toilet tissue point
• Attendant cleans soiled surfaces
• Attendant replaces or straightens (if reuse elected by guest) used towels • Attendant replenishes depleted amenities as appropriate • Attendant empties wastebasket
• Attendant adjusts drapes as appropriate
• Attendant adjusts room lighting
• Attendant delivers complimentary amenity
• Attendant refreshes ice
• Attendant replaces used glasses
• Attendant displays evening services available to the guest, such as: laundry, room service or shoeshine information
• Attendant leaves printed nighttime sentiment for guest • There is additional evidence of personalized services

6. Guest Requests
• Service phone extension is answered within three rings • Operator extends an appropriate greeting
• Operator uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Operator anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Operator is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Guest service is available by alternate means (digital application, texting, in-room device) • Requests are acknowledged and expected fulfillment time is given • Requests are handled with sense of urgency
• Item or service is received promptly, or at requested time • Delivery interaction includes the use of guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Staff anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Staff follows up appropriately to ensure guest satisfaction 7A. In-Room Dining (Order Services)
• Service is available 24/7
• Menu includes ingredients and dishes in keeping with other upscale dining option(s) offered at the property • Service number is answered within three rings, or instant access is available through other device/system • Operator extends an appropriate greeting
• Operator uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Operator exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Operator anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Operator repeats order to guest for confirmation
• Operator is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Operator provides time estimate for delivery (within 30 minutes) • Operator extends an appropriate closing
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 36 252 of 446
7B. In-Room Dining (Delivery Services)
• Delivered within five minutes of operator's commitment (guest is notified in advance if more than five minutes early) • Attendant extends an appropriate greeting
• Attendant uses guest’s name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant confirms tray/table placement
• Attendant is appropriately conversant during set-up and delivery • Attendant reviews guest order
• Attendant asks guest's permission to prepare table, pour beverage and remove food cover(s); acts accordingly
• Food presentation and quality of ingredients reflect an upscale experience • All appropriate dishware and linens are of an upscale quality • All food is served at the proper temperature
• All food is prepared as ordered
• Attendant provides written or spoken instructions for table/tray removal • Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant extends an appropriate closing
• Trays/tables are removed within 15 minutes, on request

8. Concierge Services
• Concierge is on duty or a "special services" number is available for guest use 24/7 • Attendant extends an appropriate greeting
• Attendant uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant demonstrates an extensive knowledge of area attractions and services • Attendant demonstrates first-hand knowledge beyond common internet search capability • Attendant fulfills guest's special request(s)
• Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant extends an appropriate closing

9. Bell Services (Check Out)
• Service number is answered within three rings, or alternative electronic request is acknowledged • Operator extends an appropriate greeting
• Operator uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Operator exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Operator offers to retrieve car or arrange other transportation • Operator is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Operator extends an appropriate closing
• Attendant arrives within ten minutes of request
• Attendant extends an appropriate greeting
• Attendant uses guest's name as appropriate to the manner of the guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant is appropriately conversant with guest while providing assistance • Attendant inquires about, or checks for, guest belongings possibly left behind • Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant extends an appropriate closing
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 37 253 of 446

10. Check Out Services
• Alternative check out methods are available (mobile/online/in-room device) • Attendant recognizes waiting guests appropriately
• Attendant extends an appropriate greeting
• Attendant confirms guest's name
• Attendant uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant inquires about guest stay / engages in conversation with guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant offers a copy of the folio for review
• Attendant confirms payment method
• Attendant presents guest folio options as appropriate • Attendant expresses a sincere thank you for staying at the property • Attendant sincerely encourages guest to return
• Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant extends an appropriate closing

11. Departure Services
• Given adequate notice, the guest's vehicle is waiting or alternate transportation is readily available • Attendant extends an appropriate greeting
• Attendant uses guest's name as appropriate for the manner of the guest • Attendant anticipates guest's needs or offers a personalized recommendation • Attendant is appropriately conversant with guest
• Attendant reviews all of guest's belongings and their placement in vehicle • Attendant opens and closes door for guest(s)
• Attendant is efficient and sensitive to the manner of the guest • Attendant exhibits a sincere desire to meet and comply with all guest requests • Attendant extends an appropriate closing

12. Miscellaneous Staff Services
• Guests are graciously provided directions or offered assistance via escort on request • All associates display a high level of engagement
• There is evidence that all associates are empowered by management to resolve guest issues immediately • All associates fulfill guest's special requests
• All associates are appropriately attired; name tags are clearly visible, or proper introduction is provided • All associates demonstrate appropriate behavior
• All associates demonstrate appropriate hygiene
• Short-notice pressing is available
• Shoeshine service is available
• At least one food and beverage outlet is comparable to a Four or Five Diamond Rating Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 38 254 of 446

SECTION THREE
The Listing
Once a property is Approved, we use factual property information and descriptive details to create lodging listings in AAA travel information products. Basic listings do not contain advertising or promotional verbiage, and are published at no cost to the establishment.

While you provide the objective information contained in lodging listings, the descriptive narrative is composed by AAA experts to convey key property components to guide AAA/CAA members. All listing information is updated annually, and establishments are contacted accordingly. Failure to provide information in a timely manner may result in the removal of your property from our products.

AAA Lodging Listings: Rich in Inspection Details
Lodging listings in AAA’s digital travel information products include the AAA Inspector Rating, AAA Inspector Notes and up-to-date property details. In 2017, four more elements were added based on member interest. (View actual listing on AAA.com.)
AAA Inspector Rating Details are the actual
overall, room, bath and public area
inspection scores.

A Rated lodgings scored in the top 25% for
cleanliness and condition across all rating
levels.

Best Of [1-5] Diamond have inspection
scores in the top 20% for their rating level,
no member complaints in the past 12
months and are A Rated.

Inspector Pick marks notable offerings in
categories of interest to members (e.g.,
family friendly).

AAA Inspected & Approved and Diamond
Rated lodgings are eligible to participate in
AAA’s optional, fee-based logo licensing
program. Licensees may promote the highly
recognized AAA Inspected & Approved
logos and Diamond Ratings in media
announcements, advertising materials and
on signage. Licensees also receive enhanced listings in AAA products and are eligible to participate in optional promotions. Visit AAA.biz/multimedia for more information.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 39 255 of 446
Eligibility Criteria for Separate Lodging Listing (Dual-branded development) AAA only provides separate listings for areas or sections of a property that provide clearly differentiated member experiences. The distinct sections may be located at the same property, in the surrounding complex or at a contiguous structure. The following criteria are applied to determine if a lodging is eligible for separate listing consideration. If applicable, qualified entities are each assigned their own Diamond Rating based on the guidelines outlined on pages 13-38.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SEPARATE LODGING LISTING
Diamond
Rating
1, 2, 3 4 5
Property is open to the public on a full-time basis    Property name/brand is distinctly different   
Property contact phone number is exclusive   
Concept/Theme is distinctly different   
Marketing program is distinctly different and exclusive to the property    Booking capability is exclusive to the property   
All consumer media channels position the property as a separate entity    Property is clearly distinct by virtue of a separate wing, tower or series of contiguous floors    Primarily, property access is restricted to registered guests for the brand   Staff is clearly identifiable with the brand (uniform, manner) and solely dedicated to the property   Exterior entrances are exclusive to the property 
Reception area is solely dedicated to the property 
Common areas/facilities are separate and exclusively dedicated to the property  Arrival process is solely dedicated to the property 
In-room services are solely dedicated to the property  Concierge services are solely dedicated to the property  A property must clearly qualify as a distinct and separate entity. The following examples are NOT eligible for separate listings:
• Concierge levels that offer upgraded amenities and sometimes a higher level of service. • Property sections or buildings that are separate but not clearly differentiated. • Exclusive sections of a property that require additional guest membership qualifications and, therefore, are not readily available for use by all AAA/CAA members.

FYI Designation
For lodgings, this designation identifies properties that are notable and offer potential member value but have not been inspected or Diamond Rated due to one of the following reasons:
• Too new to rate.
• Under construction.
• Undergoing extensive renovations.
• Has not been inspected.
• Does not meet all Approval Requirements but provides members a highly distinct and valuable experience.

Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 40 256 of 446
Lodging Classifications
ALL DIAMOND RATED LODGINGS ARE CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE STYLE OF OPERATION. CLASSIFICATIONS MAY BE PRECEDED BY ONE OR MORE SUBCLASSIFICATIONS IF APPLICABLE:

Bed and Breakfast: Typically owner-operated with extensive personal touches. Guests are encouraged to interact during evening and breakfast hours. A continental or full, hot breakfast is included in the room rate.

Cabin: Often located in wooded, rural or waterfront locations. Freestanding units are typically rustic and of basic design. Essential cleaning supplies, kitchen utensils and complete bed and bath linens are supplied.

Condominium: Apartment-style accommodations of varying design or décor. Units often contain one or more bedrooms, a living room, a full kitchen and an eating area. Essential cleaning supplies, kitchen utensils and complete bed and bath linens are supplied.

Cottage: Often located in wooded, rural or waterfront locations. Freestanding units are typically home-style in design and décor. Essential cleaning supplies, kitchen utensils and complete bed and bath linens are supplied.

Country Inn: Although similar in definition to a bed and breakfast, country inns are usually larger in scale with spacious public areas and offer a dining facility that serves breakfast and dinner.

Hotel: Typically a multistory property with interior room entrances and a variety of guest unit styles. The magnitude of the public areas is determined by the overall theme, location and service level, but may include a variety of facilities such as a restaurant, shops, a fitness center, a spa, a business center and meeting rooms.

House: Freestanding units of varying home-style design. Often containing two or more bedrooms, a living room, a full kitchen, a dining room and multiple bathrooms. Essential cleaning supplies, kitchen utensils and complete bed and bath linens are supplied.

Motel: A one- or two-story establishment with exterior room entrances and drive up parking. Public areas and facilities are often limited in size and/or availability.

Ranch: Typically a working ranch featuring an obvious rustic, Western theme, equestrian-related activities and a variety of guest unit styles.

SUBCLASSIFICATIONS (IF APPLICABLE):

Boutique: Often thematic, typically informal yet highly personalized; may have a luxurious or quirky style that is fashionable or unique.

Casino: Offers extensive gambling activities, such as blackjack, craps, keno and slot machines.

Classic: Renowned and landmark properties, older than 50 years, well known for their unique style and ambience.

Contemporary: Overall theme reflects characteristics of present mainstream trends.

Extended Stay: Offers a predominance of long-term accommodations with a designated full-service kitchen area in each unit.

Historic: Over 75 years old with one of the following documented historical features:
 Maintains the integrity of its historical nature
 Listed on the National Register of Historic Places
 Designated a National Historic Landmark or located in a National Register Historic District Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 41 257 of 446
Resort: Extensive recreational facilities and programs may include golf, tennis, skiing, fishing, water sports, spa treatments or professionally guided activities.

Retro: Overall theme reflects a contemporary design that reinterprets styles from a past era.

Vacation Rental: Typically houses, condominiums, cottages or cabins; these properties are “home away from home” self-catering accommodations.

Vintage: Overall theme reflects upon and maintains the authentic traits and experience of a past era.

Accessibility
Accessible Features Icon
Denotes a property that has some accessible features. It may be fully accessible, semi-accessible, or meet some of the needs of hearing-impaired individuals.

Accessibility is not a AAA Approval Requirement and will not affect your Diamond Rating. However, we strongly encourage you to make every effort to meet the needs of all your guests – including mature travelers and those with disabilities.

Member Comment Procedures

AAA MEMBER RELATIONS CLOSELY MONITORS THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF COMMENTS SUBMITTED ABOUT AAA INSPECTED & APPROVED PROPERTIES. All comments are carefully reviewed for validity and included as part of the property record.

If complaints are received, AAA will notify you and provide an opportunity to resolve the matter in a reasonable period of time. If a member complaint is determined to be of an extreme nature, AAA may act to disapprove your property immediately.

If your property is disapproved because of member complaints, you may submit a written request for re-inspection one year from the date of disapproval. The request should include an explanation of actions taken to limit future complaints and be addressed to:

The AAA Appeals Process
THE APPEALS PROCESS IS A RESOURCE FOR ALL INSPECTED PROPERTIES.

What can I appeal?
You may appeal your property’s Approval status or Diamond Rating. Each situation is handled on an individual basis.

AAA Inspections & Diamond Ratings
1000 AAA Drive, Mailstop 51
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 42 258 of 446
What is the process to file an appeal?
Before you file an appeal, please contact AAA Customer Service to discuss your questions or concerns. An analyst may be able to answer your questions immediately or, if additional information or discussion is needed, will direct you to the AAA Regional Manager of Inspections for your area.

If an issue remains unresolved after the above steps, you may choose to present relevant information to the AAA Appeals Committee for objective review. All appeals must be submitted by property owners/operators in writing to the address below. You may include pictures, documents or other pertinent materials to support the appeal. To expedite review, please outline the specific concerns in a succinct manner. Each appeal is thoroughly researched and given thoughtful consideration and a substantive reply by the committee. The committee’s decision on your appeal is considered as AAA’s final response. You will be notified as to the status of your appeal within 45 days of receipt of your written statement.

Green Programs
AAA supports environmental management and sustainability throughout the lodging industry to the extent that truly effective programs maintain quality standards of guest comfort. We strongly encourage continued use of programs that offer guests choices without negative consequences for noncompliance. Effective green programs are intended to reduce waste without reducing guest comfort.

In AAA travel information products, lodgings certified by approved green programs are identified with an icon in their listing.

AAA is not involved in the evaluation or certification of a property's environmental practices but does regularly review requirements and best practices related to the most reputable sustainable programs.

AAA Appeals Committee
1000 AAA Drive, Mailstop 51
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
AAA Customer Service
407-444-8370, Option 2
[email protected]
M-F, 8:30 a.m.-5:15 p.m. (ET)
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 43 259 of 446
Establishments in all areas of the U.S. (excluding Southern California; see below), Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean should contact AAA at:

Establishments in Southern California should contact the following AAA club:

Automobile Club of Southern California
P.O. Box 25001
Santa Ana, CA 92799-5001
Inspections and Official Appointments
714-885-2247
Advertising
714-885-2394
AAA Listings/Customer Service
[email protected]
407-444-8370, Option 2
AAA Inspections & Diamond Ratings
1000 AAA Drive, Mailstop 51
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
Official Appointments and Advertising
407-444-8280
Lodging Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 44 260 of 446
261 of 446
262 of 446
ntroduction
Dear Hospitality Professional,
On behalf of AAA, I am pleased to introduce to you the latest edition of the AAA Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines for restaurants.

These guidelines are provided with two objectives in mind:
♦ To ensure our ratings program is accurate and relevant to the restaurant information needs of over 59 million AAA/CAA members.
♦ To provide a valuable reference for helping you achieve your establishment’s AAA Approval and Diamond Rating goal.

To that end, we feel it is important for AAA to partner with the hospitality industry by gathering your input, discussing our ratings and openly sharing with you how the Diamond Rating System applies to your restaurant. We urge you to take full advantage of the information provided by AAA inspectors during evaluations, as each of our experts eats in over 200 restaurants every year — representing insight on a wide range of dining experiences across the United States, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean.

We appreciate your continued service to members and participation in AAA programs.

More than 80 years ago, in 1937, AAA hired its first field representatives to inspect and report on lodgings and restaurants. In 1963, AAA introduced a rating system for hotels, adding the diamond symbol in 1977 in honor of the association’s 75-year anniversary. A decade later, the Diamond Rating system was expanded to include inspector ratings for restaurants, prompting AAA to seek industry input for its first comprehensive AAA Approval & Diamond Rating Guidelines for restaurants, published in 1989. Prior to this, only minimum Approval Requirements were printed and distributed on request.

I
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 2 263 of 446
Section One
AAA Inspections and Diamond Ratings
How do I apply for an inspection?
How are the Approval decision and Diamond Rating determined? The AAA Five Diamond Rating
Defining AAA Approval Requirements and AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines What’s the difference between AAA Approval Requirements and AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines?
AAA Approval Requirements
Section Two
AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines
What the Diamonds Mean
Food Service
Presentation Initial Contact
Menu Components Food & Beverage Service
Preparation
Décor
Design Elements
Section Three
The Listing
FYI Designation
Restaurant Classifications and Cuisine Types
Accessibility
Member Comment Procedures
The AAA Appeals Process
Green Programs
Contact Information

CONTENTS
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 3 264 of 446

SECTION ONE
AAA Inspections and Diamond Ratings
How do I apply for an inspection?
The first step to becoming AAA Approved, Diamond Rated and listed in AAA travel information products is to be inspected. To be considered a valid applicant for AAA inspection, establishments must meet all of the Approval Requirements for their restaurant category. The requirements reflect members' basic expectations for a restaurant experience. We recommend you carefully review the requirements to verify your establishment's eligibility before applying.

Currently listed establishments need not reapply, as our inspectors will routinely conduct follow-up inspections of your restaurant.

By applying for inspection, you agree that, if your establishment is selected and passes inspection, AAA may publish your restaurant’s pertinent information and Diamond Rating in AAA travel information products, regardless of the rating level assessment. The decision to inspect a restaurant is at the sole discretion of AAA. The decision to Approve a restaurant and the choice of a rating level are based on conditions noted at the time of the inspection.

To expedite the application process, we suggest the following approach:
• Verify your establishment's eligibility by reviewing the AAA Approval Requirements. Restaurants must meet all Approval Requirements to be valid applicants.
• Complete and submit the Restaurant Inspection Application (pdf). • Complete and submit the Restaurant Application Processing Fee Form (pdf). The nonrefundable $300 application processing fee helps offset the costs of validating property information; it does not guarantee an inspection or influence the outcome.

AAA guarantees a fair review of all applications and, for those who qualify, an inspection within one year of acceptance notification. AAA reserves all rights to apply priority consideration to establishments providing the highest degree of AAA member value in making travel-related decisions. Key considerations determined through ongoing member research include:
• HIGHLY DESIRABLE OR CONVENIENT LOCATION
• NEWLY BUILT, NEWLY OPENED, OR RECENTLY RENOVATED
• HIGH DEGREE OF COMFORT, CLEANLINESS AND CONDITION
• NOTABLE OR REPUTABLE
• UNIQUE CUISINE, DESIGN OR STYLE OF OPERATION
Once your establishment is Approved, an inspector will revisit periodically to confirm or update your status and rating.

All inspections are unannounced to ensure an unbiased dining experience.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 4 265 of 446
How are the Approval decision and Diamond Rating determined? The AAA evaluation consists of three parts:
• RESERVATION
• DINING EXPERIENCE
• INTERVIEW
First, your property must meet all AAA Approval Requirements and provide member value. All establishments are validated through a combined process of applications, inspections, referrals and media research.

Second, if your restaurant qualifies, the inspector will dine anonymously while benchmarking the experience against our Diamond Rating guidelines, which reflect AAA member priorities and typical trends throughout the restaurant industry. Our inspector will also assess key subjective elements based on the on-site dining experience. The comprehensive evaluation includes a review of the following key dining essentials:
• CLEANLINESS AND CONDITION
• FOOD
• SERVICE
• DÉCOR
• MANAGEMENT AND STAFF
AAA’s intent is to capture the essence of the total dining experience rather than just particular attributes of your restaurant. Our research shows that AAA members consider the quality of the food and service to be the most significant factors when eating out — and décor to be less important in defining their dining experience. Therefore, we assign the highest weight (85% of the overall Diamond Rating) to food and service elements — with décor making up just 15% of the rating.

Once our assessment is complete, the inspector will recommend or assign a Diamond Rating (or other appropriate designation) based on existing conditions at the time of the evaluation. The achievement of a AAA Diamond Rating means that your restaurant is one of an exclusive group that has successfully completed this rigorous evaluation process.

Lastly, AAA will contact the owner, general manager or restaurant designee for a brief interview. This is an extremely important part of the evaluation, as the data gathered is used in our worldwide travel information applications.

The AAA Five Diamond Rating
If the AAA inspector determines that your establishment meets the Five Diamond guidelines for a world-class experience, your restaurant will be considered for the prestigious Five Diamond Rating. All Five Diamond Rating recommendations are forwarded to AAA's Five Diamond Committee for thorough review. Those that qualify will be advised via email of the committee's assessment.

A couple of tidbits:

Rating adjustments are restricted to
limited cases and are applied at the
sole discretion of AAA.

The frequency of subsequent AAA
evaluations varies slightly, depending
on factors such as classification,
rating, history, AAA member and AAA
club feedback, and operational
changes at an establishment.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 5 266 of 446
Defining AAA Approval Requirements and
AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines
What’s the difference between AAA Approval Requirements and AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines?
While the Approval Requirements are mandatory standards, the Diamond Rating guidelines are a reflection of what is typically seen throughout the various market segments of the restaurant industry. Therefore, failure to meet all Approval Requirements precludes an establishment from passing inspection, but variances in some rating categories does not necessarily preclude the achievement of that rating.

Additionally, while the same Approval Requirements apply to all restaurant types, not all Diamond Rating guidelines apply. AAA inspectors use only the sections of the Diamond Rating guidelines applicable to the restaurant’s classification. This approach allows restaurateurs to be creative in developing their market identity and steadfast in meeting the needs of their guests while achieving a Diamond Rating level relevant to AAA member expectations.

AAA Approval Requirements
The AAA Approval Requirements for restaurants are essential, common-sense qualifications AAA members say are important and, similarly, standards most professional operators routinely employ. To be AAA Approved, an establishment must meet the following requirements:

Cleanliness and Condition

1. Establishment must provide AAA members value in all aspects of operation.

2. All facilities directly associated with an establishment must be clean and well-maintained throughout.

3. All food and beverage must be wholesome, free from contamination and properly handled and stored.

Management Style of Operation

4. An establishment may not use AAA trademarks — including, but not limited to, the AAA logo and Diamond Rating — without AAA’s prior written consent.

5. The establishment must be appropriately located for business or leisure travel.

6. The establishment must assist AAA in the resolution of member complaints.

7. All restaurant staff must conduct business in a professional and ethical manner providing attentive, conscientious service to guests.

8. Restaurant management, or a designated representative, must be readily accessible at all times for guest needs or requests.

9. The primary business operation of the establishment must be directly related to the preparation and service of food.

10. Management must readily provide establishment information as requested by AAA on a continuing basis for the purpose of maintaining accurate travel information for AAA products and publications.

11. The establishment must be in compliance with all local, state and federal codes.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 6 267 of 446
Exterior and Public Areas

12. Establishments must have accurate, legible signage in appropriate areas.

13. All facilities directly associated with an establishment (such as banquet rooms, bakeries and gift shops) provided for guest use must meet all appropriate AAA Approval Requirements.

14. Adequate illumination is required in all public areas. This includes sufficient lighting in all corridors, walkways, stairways, landings and parking areas.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 7 268 of 446

SECTION TWO
AAA Diamond Rating Guidelines
AAA DIAMOND RATINGS FOR RESTAURANTS REPRESENT A COMBINATION OF THE OVERALL FOOD, SERVICE AND DÉCOR OFFERED. The widely recognized and trusted Diamonds help AAA members choose the right restaurant experience to fit the whim or special occasion.

AAA inspectors determine a restaurant’s Diamond Rating using standards based on AAA member priorities, insight from our expert inspectors and involvement from various restaurant industry professionals.

Diamonds are assigned using a member-solicited weighted average of all restaurant characteristics, with a focus on overall guest impression rather than on individual elements. The final factor is the professional judgment of our inspectors: North America’s travel experts in reviewing over 30,000 restaurants per year.

What the Diamonds Mean
One Diamond
Simple, economical food, often quick-serve, in a functional environment.

Two Diamond
Familiar food, often cooked to order, served in casual surroundings.

Three Diamond
Trendy cuisine, skillfully prepared and served, with expanded beverage options, in an enhanced setting.

Four Diamond
Distinctive fine-dining. Creative preparations, skillfully served, often with wine steward, amid upscale ambience.

Five Diamond
Leading-edge cuisine of the finest ingredients, uniquely prepared by an acclaimed chef, served by expert service staff led by maître d’ in extraordinary surroundings.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 8 269 of 446
FOOD
(50% of overall Diamond Rating)
Presentation Overall impact or visual appeal incorporating dishware, food placement and garnish used in combination to present appetizers, soups, salads, main courses, desserts and other offerings.

Food Placement & Visual
Appeal Functional, not stylish Common concepts are
noticeably enhanced
Well-coordinated
using innovative/
expanded concepts
implemented in
precise fashion
3D plus*:

Artistic/ detailed
concept with wellbalanced portions and
a variety of textures,
colors and ingredients
4D plus:

Extremely imaginative
with uniquely exclusive
concepts
No discernible garnish
is used
Limited use of
common garnishes:
primarily ornamental in
nature (parsley, lemon
wedge, lettuce leaf,
kale, cherry tomato,
etc.)
Garnishes are less
familiar; refined
placement or
techniques (patterned
slicing, fine dice,
julienne, or other
precise styles, carved
vegetables or fruits,
specialty greens,
flowers, or herbs)
Artistically integrated
as ornamental or
flavor enhancements
Each ingredient and
plate component
supports a leadingedge plate design and
enriches the concept;
food and garnish are in
perfect harmony
Dishware
Disposable materials
or basic synthetic
baskets
Predominantly basic
quality ceramic, glass
or washable synthetic
(polycarbonate /
melamine) or woven
baskets; some
disposable condiment
containers or side
dishes
2D plus:

Noticeable
enhancements to
design and materials
with appropriate
accessories, such as:
bread & butter plates,
ramekins, pitchers
3D plus:

The finest quality
materials and design
throughout (fine
china, custom ceramic,
porcelain, etc.)
Some use of varied
and unique pieces as
part of the overall food
presentation (creative
packaging)
4D plus:

Predominant use of
varied and unique
pieces as part of the
overall food
presentation (creative
packaging)
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 9 * Plus - When you see this term used (such as 2D plus), it means that the rating includes the bolded elements of the previous columns in addition to elements of the current column. 270 of 446
FOOD
(50% of overall Diamond Rating)
Menu
Components The features that make up the menu item.

Ingredients
All forms of staple
items (fresh, frozen,
canned, dried, etc.);
No uncommon items
Frequent use of
convenience foods
Predominantly staple
items with some
uncommon items
Some evidence of the
use of convenience
foods
Blend of staple and
uncommon, with
some use of unique
(artisanal)* items;
Predominantly fresh
and/or specialty items
No evidence of the
use of convenience
foods
* Relating to or being a
food or beverage made by
hand or by traditional
methods
3D plus:

Increased use of
uncommon and
unique (artisanal)
items.
4D plus:

Predominant use of
unique (artisanal) and
uncommon items;
most ingredients are
unique to each dish
Preparation The selection, measurement and combining of ingredients in an ordered procedure to achieve a desired result.

Menu incorporates a
limited variety of
common food
preparation
techniques
Menu incorporates an
increased variety of
common food
preparation
techniques
2D plus:

Menu incorporates
some advanced food
preparation
techniques and chefcomposed dishes
à la minute*
3D plus:

Menu incorporates an
increased variety of
advanced cooking
techniques
4D plus:

Food is prepared in a
manner that is highly
imaginative and
unique
Typical of a short
order* cook
*Someone in a restaurant
kitchen who cooks food
that can be prepared
easily or quickly
Typical of a
professionally-trained
cook
Typical of a highly
experienced cook or
chef
*prepared to order,
rather than being prepped
in advance and held for
service
Typical of a series of
professionally-trained
chefs
Commensurate with a
mastery of the
culinary arts; typical of
a renowned
professional chef
Standard Rotation
(excluding daily
specials) Predominantly
standard menu
selections throughout
the year
Limited menu
selections change
seasonally
Most menu selections
change seasonally
Menus available
suggesting food and
beverage pairings
3D plus:

Some menu selections
change daily/weekly,
driven by market
availability
A chef’s tasting menu
is offered; typically in
addition to à la carte
selections
4D plus:

Most menu selections
change daily/weekly
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 10 * Plus - When you see this term used (such as 2D plus), it means that the rating includes the bolded elements of the previous columns in addition to elements of the current column. 271 of 446
The “OH!” Zone
FOOD
Beverages Quality and variety of offerings. At higher rating levels, beverages typically include sparkling and still bottled water along with a diverse selection of wines (varying degrees of complexity, price range, availability and production style). If alcoholic beverages are not provided or are limited, the inspector gives consideration to prevailing laws and restaurant concepts.

Bread Availability, appropriateness for the cuisine or meal and, to increasing degrees at higher rating levels, quality and complexity, from simple and processed to creative and imaginative.

Competency Extent to which the food is prepared and cooked as ordered; degree to which the cooking techniques preserve colors, textures and consistency of soups, sauces and emulsions.

Complimentary Chef’s Extra Availability, quality and creativity. Typically found only at the Four and Five Diamond levels. May include a chef starter (amuse-bouche), intermezzo (palate-cleansing course), soup, confections, pastries and/or cookies (mignardises and petits fours), a complimentary drink or parting gift.

Other Optional category for including additional observations or increasing the impact of a separately recorded observation.

Portion Size Appropriateness of serving size in relation to cuisine, style or rating level.

Taste Measure of how ingredients, sauces and seasonings complement or conflict each other.

Temperature Appropriateness of the food temperature.

Value Appropriateness of cost in relation to elements of the food, service and décor.

Variety Degree to which variety fits guest expectations and the restaurant concept and its impact on quality.

Subjective Zones

MEASURES ON SEVERAL IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THE

DINING EXPERIENCE ARE STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY
PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND EXPECTATIONS.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 11 272 of 446

SERVICE
(35% of overall Diamond Rating)
Initial Contact Establishing a connection through interaction via remote communication or direct contact.

Initial Greeting
Limited or no greeting
at entrance
Handled by an
associate with
multiple
responsibilities
(cashier/hostess/
waitperson)
When unattended,
there is an indication
that advises guest to
“Please wait to be
seated”
Solely dedicated
greeter(s) handle(s)
guest’s reservation,
arrival and
determines seating
3D plus:

Professional
host/hostess is
engaging, wellpracticed and
knowledgeable
Reservation time is
honored within ten
minutes; if delayed,
the attendant is adept
at making proper
accommodations
without hesitation
4D plus:

Greeter uses guest’s
name upon engaging
guest
Offers personal
assistance with coats,
packages, umbrellas,
etc.

Seating
Self-seating Associate leads guest
to table; advises guest
of server’s name
Menu is at the table or
presented as guest is
seated
Associate is engaging;
initiates a
conversation as guest
is seated
Menu and wine list
(if available) are
presented at the
appropriate time and
offered directly to
each guest
Extra place settings
are removed if
necessary
3D plus:

A well-practiced
approach with
personal assistance
provided, such as the
moving of a chair
and/or table as
appropriate
Table is preset per
reservation
4D plus:

Guest’s name is used
as appropriate;
anticipates guest’s
needs in some
additional manner
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 12 * Plus - When you see this term used (such as 2D plus), it means that the rating includes the bolded elements of the previous columns in addition to elements of the current column. 273 of 446

SERVICE
(35% of overall Diamond Rating)
Food & Beverage
Service
The level of assistance provided guests from order-taking through food delivery, payment and departure.

Style
Counter service order
and pickup (quick
serve, cafeteria or
complete buffet-style
service)
Some self-service
aspects may be
evident (digital device
ordering and
payment), however,
table service is
predominant; single
server responsibility is
clearly evident
2D plus:

No self-service
aspects; team
approach is clearly
evident
3D plus:

Distinguished
delivery, well-defined
roles; proficient with
a strong desire to be
of assistance
4D plus:

Exceptionally efficient
while seamlessly
exceeding guest
expectations;
all service staff display
expert knowledge of
the menu; courses are
described as they are
served
Functional approach Service style is
practical and
deliberate;
appropriate to the
overall theme
Service style is skilled,
measured and
accommodating
Provides an elevated
level of personal
attention adapted to
the convenience and
comfort of the guest
Provides a meticulous
degree of personal
attention and
demonstrates an
unconditional desire
to be of service
Beverage
Information
Common reference of
beverages available
with no additional
description provided
Enhanced beverage
reference available,
including additional
descriptions of
specialty drinks,
wines and/or spirits
2D plus:

A knowledgeable
staff representative is
available to
accommodate guest’s
special needs.
3D plus:

Most associates are
well-versed on
providing menuspecific assistance
with beverage
selection (such as
wine/beer pairings)
4D plus:

Expert beverage
knowledge is readily
available;
(professional
mixologist and
sommelier)
Check Settlement
Payment is made by
guest with the cashier
Server handles check
settlement
Check presentation
materials are basic,
such as: check/receipt
only or the use of a
common plate, plastic
tray or branded credit
card merchant folder
2D plus:

Check presentation
materials are
enhanced in a manner
relative to the overall
theme
3D plus:

Server is discreet in
anticipating and
presenting check for
settlement
Check presentation
materials are
consistent with the
upscale décor and
theme of
establishment
4D plus:

Check presentation
includes mignardises
and/or a take- home
gift, such as a
personalized menu,
specialty item, boxed
chocolates
Departure
Staff
acknowledgment
not expected
Server thanks guest
2D plus:

Host/hostess
acknowledges guest
departure
3D plus:

Several staff
members
acknowledge guest
departure
4D plus:

Guest’s name is used
during departure
Staff anticipates
guest’s needs in some
manner, such as:
validate parking,
arrange
transportation, offer
to retrieve coats
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 13 274 of 446
The Hospitality Zone

SERVICE
Attentiveness Degree to which the servers are thoughtful, caring, considerate and focused on guest satisfaction, with greater attention to detail expected at higher rating levels.

Competency Measure of staff capabilities, awareness and aptitude for meeting guest needs.

Congeniality Cordiality of staff in all areas.

Guest Feels Well Served At the end of the dining experience, degree to which the guest feels that staff has provided exemplary hospitality.

Knowledge Efficiency, style and correctness of staff in answering questions about food and beverage offerings and general restaurant information.

Mobile-Enabled Service Options Extent to which the use of mobile devices for ordering and payment enhance or detract from service.

Other Optional category for including additional observations or increasing the impact of a separately recorded observation.

Reservations Ease and efficiency of the reservation process online, or by phone.

Special Requests Degree to which staff will accommodate special guest needs (within reason) and the chef will make menu alterations for reasons of taste, preference or health concerns.

Timeliness Suitability and correctness of the experience (well-paced for guest needs).

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 14 Subjective Zones

MEASURES ON SEVERAL IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THE

DINING EXPERIENCE ARE STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY
PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND EXPECTATIONS.

If offerings in these areas are noted by the
inspector as typical, a “blank” (no score) is
assigned; if the offering is atypical, either positively or negatively, a “+0.01” or “-0.01” is assigned. Zone
scores are tallied, and the combined total impacts
the establishment’s Diamond Rating computation.
275 of 446
DÉCOR
(15% of overall Diamond Rating)
Design Elements The use of colors, space, texture, and other components to define the appearance, functionality and ambience.

Materials
(Colors, fabrics,
textures, fixtures,
etc.)
Predominantly basic
materials
Obvious
enhancements to
materials
Significant
enhancements to
materials
Upscale materials Luxurious and/or
unique materials
Overall Impression
Basic appeal;
practical; purposeful
Primary focus is on
seating capacity and
quick turnover rather
than comfort
1D plus:

Enhanced level of
overall comfort and
appeal
A good balance
between a welcoming
ambience and
maximum seating
capacity
2D plus:

Advanced level of
overall comfort and
appeal
Provides an enriched
and efficient guest
experience
3D plus:

Design is highly
functional, wellsuited for comfort
and extended dining
4D plus:

Luxurious, leadingedge (innovative,
intelligent, efficient)
Entrance / Foyer
No reception area Clearly-defined
reception area/stand
2D plus:

Distinct separation
between the
reception area and
dining areas (diners
are not distracted by
waiting guests)
3D plus:

Design characteristics
are clearly upscale
4D plus:

Design characteristics
are clearly luxurious
and uniquely
appointed
Waiting Area
and/or Lounge
None Small waiting area or
bar with seating
Appropriately-sized
waiting area or
lounge (with tables,
chairs/booths);
distinctly separate
from the main dining
area
3D plus:

Design characteristics
are clearly upscale
4D plus:

Design characteristics
are clearly luxurious
and uniquely
appointed
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 15 * Plus - When you see this term used (such as 2D plus), it means that the rating includes the bolded elements of the previous columns in addition to elements of the current column. 276 of 446
DÉCOR
(15% of overall Diamond Rating)
Design Elements
(continued)
The use of colors, space, texture, and other components to define the appearance, functionality and ambience.

Tabletop Covers
Bare surfaces of basic
quality materials
(such as: laminate,
wood, metal, acrylic,
vinyl, resin, molded
melamine) with
standard finish
1D plus:

Modest
enhancements, such
as: paper placemats,
paper/vinyl /plastic
tablecloths, butcher
paper/acrylic overlay
If exposed, table
surfaces are of a
decorative style with a
polished /lacquered
finish or glass overlay
Synthetic treatments,
such as: polyester,
poplin, spandex,
leatherette −
tablecloths, placemats
or runners
If exposed, table
surfaces are of
designer quality
materials, such as:
highly polished fine
wood, granite, marble
Enhanced with natural
quality treatments,
such as: cottonsynthetic blends,
leather, rattan,
bamboo − tablecloths,
placemats or runners
Tables are padded or
double tablecloths are
used as silencers
Tablecloths are
natural fabrics with a
luxurious feel
(typically
cotton/linen) with a
freshly-pressed
appearance (minimal
wrinkles or creasing)
Napery
Basic, paper napkins
1D plus:

Enhanced design or
weight
Synthetic cloth
napkins
Natural fabrics
(typically cotton)
Luxurious linen
Table Setting
Enhancements
None or basic need
items, such as:
condiment containers,
salt, pepper, sugar,
napkin dispenser
Common overall
appeal
Utensils rolled in
napkin, paper
placemats, preset
menu, children’s
games and/or
promotional flyers,
etc.

Trendy overall appeal
Cloth napkin folds;
preset utensils and
glassware
Decorative table
enhancement
(flowers, candles,
ornament, etc.)
3D plus:

Well-coordinated
first-class effect
4D plus:

Charger or show plate
Flatware
Disposable materials Washable materials,
everyday quality of
basic design;
lightweight grade
2D plus:

Medium-weight grade
stainless steel with
obvious matching
design enhancements
3D plus:

The finest quality
stainless steel (18/10
or 18/8) heavyweight
grade with upscale
design enhancements
Coordinated set
throughout with
appropriate pieces
for menu offerings
4D plus:

Silver plated or finer
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 16 * Plus - When you see this term used (such as 2D plus), it means that the rating includes the bolded elements of the previous columns in addition to elements of the current column. 277 of 446
DÉCOR
(15% of overall Diamond Rating)
Design Elements
(continued)
The use of colors, space, texture, and other components to define the appearance, functionality and ambience Glassware
Disposable materials Washable plastic
(polycarbonate/
melamine) or
heavyweight glass of
common style
Pieces are often
uncoordinated
throughout
Medium-weight glass
with distinct style;
appropriate pieces
for beverage
offerings
3D plus:

Lightweight glass of
the finest quality
4D plus:

Consistent
throughout all aspects
of beverage service
(design and quality of
barware is
comparable to table
settings)
Chairs/Stools/
Benches
Simple, functional,
unpadded; limited
comfort
Enhanced design for
good comfort
2D plus:

Well-coordinated
materials and design
with coverings or
padding for
sustainable comfort
3D plus:

Upscale materials and
design with ample
padding on seat and
back for extended
comfort
4D plus:

Luxurious; materials
and design provide
the highest degree of
comfort
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 17 * Plus - When you see this term used (such as 2D plus), it means that the rating includes the bolded elements of the previous columns in addition to elements of the current column. 278 of 446
The Comfort Zone
DÉCOR
Ambience Impact of the surroundings on the dining experience.

Cleanliness Cleanliness throughout the restaurant.

Comfort Functionality and overall impression of the furnishings.

Condition Condition throughout the restaurant.

Illumination Functionality, design and effect of the lighting.

Information Design & Presentation
(menu, business card, etc.)
Character of the menu, wine list and business cards.

Noise Level Impact of noise on the dining experience.

Other Optional category for including additional observations or increasing the impact of a separately recorded observation.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 18 Subjective Zones

MEASURES ON SEVERAL IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THE

DINING EXPERIENCE ARE STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY
PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND EXPECTATIONS.

If offerings in these areas are noted by the
inspector as typical, a “blank” (no score) is
assigned; if the offering is atypical, either positively or negatively, a “+0.01” or “-0.01” is assigned. Zone
scores are tallied and the combined total impacts
the establishment’s Diamond Rating computation.
279 of 446
AAA Restaurant Inspections Video
“From Soup to Nuts”
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 19 Watch the process AAA restaurant inspectors use to ensure AAA/CAA members have positive dining experiences at eateries across North America.

Listen in as an inspector shares a meal — and the inside scoop — during a AAA restaurant evaluation. Learn why anonymity is important and how AAA's restaurant listings offer members a detailed picture of what to expect at your restaurant.
280 of 446

SECTION THREE
The Listing

ONCE A RESTAURANT IS APPROVED, AAA GATHERS FACTUAL INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTIVE DETAILS TO ADD TO OUR DATABASE, USED TO CREATE RESTAURANT LISTINGS IN AAA’S PRINT AND DIGITAL TRAVEL PLANNING PRODUCTS. The listings, which contain no advertising or promotional verbiage, are published in AAA products at no cost to the establishment.

Listing copy describing the restaurant is based in part on objective information provided by the establishment. This listing information is updated annually, and establishments are contacted accordingly. Failure to provide listing information in a timely manner may result in the deletion of your establishment from our database.

Listings also include narrative composed by AAA’s professionally trained inspectors. Inspectors employ a degree of skilled subjectivity to convey key components of the restaurant experience to AAA members.

AAA Approved and Diamond Rated restaurants are eligible to participate in AAA’s optional, fee-based Official Appointment logo licensing program. Licensees may promote the renowned AAA/CAA Approved logo and Diamond Ratings in media announcements, advertising materials and on signage. Licensees also receive enhanced listings in AAA products and are eligible to purchase display advertising. Visit AAA.biz/multimedia for more information.

FYI Designation
For restaurants, this designation identifies establishments that have not yet been evaluated by a AAA inspector but offer potential member value. These restaurants are unrated due to one of the following reasons:
• The establishment is undergoing extensive renovations. • The establishment has not been evaluated.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 20 281 of 446
Restaurant Classifications and Cuisine Types

ALL AAA APPROVED AND DIAMOND RATED RESTAURANTS ARE CLASSIFIED BY THE OVERALL DINING AND SERVICE CONCEPT, AGE OF OPERATIONS AND/OR HISTORIC STATUS OF BUILDING.

Brewpub: Specializes in the brewing of beer; typically limited food menu and full table service.

Buffet-style: Typically traditional comfort items available at self-service food and beverage stations; limited table service.

Casual Dining: Full table service in a relaxed atmosphere.

Classic: Renowned and landmark restaurant operations in business longer than 25 years; known for unique style and ambience.

Dinner Theater: Full or limited table service; typically limited food and beverage menu; entertainment provided in conjunction with the dining experience.

Fine Dining: Full table service; notable, upscale and complex elements are evident throughout.

Gastropub: Full table service; relaxed ambience of a tavern/bar but with enhanced focus on cuisine similar to that of a more advanced full-service restaurant.

Historic: Includes at least one of the following documented historical features:
• Maintains the integrity of the historical nature
• Listed on the National Register of Historic Places
• Registered as or located in a National Historic Landmark or located in a National Register Historic District Note: If a restaurant is located in a National Historic Landmark/District, it must retain the original historic character and/or significantly contribute to the historic value of the associated area to be designated as Historic.

Quick-Serve: Counter- or self-service food and beverages; includes traditional fast food menu items and casual setting.

Sports Bar: Full table service; sports theme experience.

Restaurants are also identified by more than 100 cuisine types (such as Italian or French) and, if applicable, additional descriptors (such as Northern or Traditional) to provide user a general sense of the type of cuisine offered.

Accessibility
Denotes a restaurant that has some accessible features. It may be fully accessible, semi-accessible, or meet some of the needs of hearing-impaired individuals.

Accessibility is not a requirement for listing and will not affect your Diamond Rating. However, we strongly encourage you to make every effort to meet the needs of all your guests – including the mature traveler and those with disabilities.

Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 21 282 of 446
Member Comment Procedures

AAA MEMBER RELATIONS CLOSELY MONITORS THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF COMMENTS SUBMITTED ABOUT APPROVED PROPERTIES. All comments are carefully reviewed for validity and included as part of the property record. If complaints are received, AAA will notify the establishment and provide an opportunity to resolve the matter within a reasonable period of time. If a member complaint is determined to be of an extreme nature, AAA may act to disapprove a property immediately.

If a property is disapproved for member complaints, a written request for a re-evaluation may be submitted, accompanied by an explanation of the actions taken to limit future complaints.

Note: Properties may not reapply until one year has passed from the date of disapproval.

All requests may be addressed to:

The AAA Appeals Process
THE APPEALS PROCESS IS A RESOURCE FOR ALL INSPECTED PROPERTIES.

What can I appeal?
You may appeal your property’s Approval status or Diamond Rating. Each situation is handled on an individual basis.

How do I file an appeal?
First, contact:

In many cases, our analysts will be able to answer your question(s) immediately. If there is a continuing need for additional information or discussion, we will direct your call to the AAA Regional Manager for your area.

AAA Inspections & Diamond Ratings
1000 AAA Drive, Mailstop 51
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
AAA Customer Service
407-444-8370, Option 2
[email protected]
Monday through Friday,
8:30am to 5:15pm (Eastern Time)
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 22 283 of 446
The AAA Appeals Process (cont’d)
If an issue remains unresolved after the above steps, an establishment may choose to present relevant information to the AAA Appeals Committee for objective review. All appeals must be submitted by property management in writing and may include pictures, documents or other pertinent materials to support the appeal. In order to expedite this process, appeals should outline the specific concerns in a succinct manner. Each appeal is thoroughly researched and given thoughtful consideration and a substantive reply by the committee. The committee’s decision on your appeal is considered as AAA’s final response. You will be notified as to the status of your appeal within 45 days of receipt of your written statement.

All appeals should be sent to:

Green Programs

AAA SUPPORTS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY THROUGHOUT THE

RESTAURANT INDUSTRY TO THE EXTENT THAT TRULY EFFECTIVE PROGRAMS MAINTAIN QUALITY STANDARDS OF GUEST COMFORT. We strongly encourage continued use of programs that offer guests choices without negative consequences for noncompliance. Effective green programs are intended to reduce waste without reducing guest comfort.

In AAA travel information products, restaurants certified by approved green programs are identified with an ECO icon in their listing.

This icon indicates restaurants that are environmentally sustainable in their use of food, water, energy, waste, chemicals, disposables and more.

AAA Appeals Committee
1000 AAA Drive, Mailstop 51
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 23 284 of 446
Establishments in all areas of the U.S. (excluding Southern California; see below), Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean should contact AAA at:

Establishments in Southern California should contact the following AAA club:

Automobile Club of Southern California
P.O. Box 25001
Santa Ana, CA 92799-5001
Inspections and Official Appointments
714-885-2247
Advertising
714-885-2394
Restaurant Approval Requirements & Diamond Rating Guidelines Page 24 AAA Listings/Customer Service
[email protected]
407-444-8370, Option 2
AAA Inspections & Diamond Ratings
1000 AAA Drive, Mailstop 51
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
Official Appointments and Advertising
407-444-8280
285 of 446
286 of 446
9c

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Second Public Hearing Regarding the Composition of Council Districts Related to the City's Proposed Transition to District-Based Councilmember Elections

1. Motion Directing Staff Regarding Preparation of Draft District Maps

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Council has initiated the process to transition from its at-large council election system to council districts. This matter is the second public hearing to solicit public input on the composition of council districts.
287 of 446
2 c 9

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A.

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council conduct the second public hearing pertaining to the composition of council districts related to the City’s proposed transition to district-based elections and provide any direction regarding draft maps it deems appropriate.

BACKGROUND
On May 2, 2023, the Council adopted Resolution No. 23-55 declaring its intent to initiate the process to transition from at-large to district-based councilmember elections pursuant to Elections Code section 10010. The Council directed staff to commence the process to transition to council districts by way of amendment to the City Charter, to include a proposal to transition to six council districts and a directly elected mayor who would be a voting member of the Council. This hearing is the second public hearing the Council will hold regarding the composition of council districts.

ANALYSIS
Public Hearing
Pursuant to Elections Code section 10010, the Council is required to hold two public hearings before the preparation of draft maps, and then have at least two public hearings after the publication of draft maps. The City intends to have at least five public hearings with the fifth hearing being the adoption of the final map. After this public hearing, the additional public hearings are scheduled for August 15, 2023, October 10, 2023, and October 24, 2023. The principal purpose of this second public hearing is for the City’s demographer, National Demographics Corporation (NDC), to provide another overview of the criteria the City must utilize for preparation of the maps and for the public to provide input on the consideration of those criteria in developing maps and the composition of the districts.

District Criteria
In accordance with Elections Code section 21601, the Council must draw districts that satisfy the following criteria:
• Council districts must be substantially equal in population based on the total population of residents of the city as determined by the most recent census with adjustments mandated by the State of California.
• Council district boundaries must comply with the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, and the federal Voting Rights Act. • The Council shall adopt district boundaries using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority:
(i) To the extent practicable, council districts shall be geographically contiguous. (ii) To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A “community of interest” is a population that shares common social or 288 of 446
3 c 9
economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. (iii) Council district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city. (iv) To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, council districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.
• The Council must not draw district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party.

Feedback and Direction on Draft Maps
After the second public hearing, NDC will commence preparation of draft maps taking into consideration the criteria above as well as public comment provided with respect to these criteria. Those draft maps, along with all draft maps submitted by members of the public, will then be published no later than August 8, 2023, seven days prior to the 3rd public hearing. It is appropriate for Council to provide input at the conclusion of the second hearing regarding the district criteria, including what local neighborhoods or local communities of interest should be preserved in particular districts.

Additionally, although the Council’s feedback and direction to date have been to pursue a district plan that include six council districts and a directly elected mayor, the Council has not been unanimous on the type of district plan to pursue and whether or not to include a directly elected mayor. If the Council desires to direct the preparation of draft maps other than an option involving six districts and a directly elected mayor, it should direct the demographer to do so at this second hearing. While having alternative maps and governance plans may add to the complexity of the process, if the Council desires to leave its options open, now is the best time to provide the direction to the demographer to prepare draft maps that consider seven council districts or other alternative plans for public review and feedback.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The City has commenced an extensive public outreach process in conjunction with the districting process. In addition to at least five public hearings before the Council, the City – with the assistance of outreach consultant Tripepi Smith – is scheduled to hold community workshops, numerous pop-ups at City events, and engage in additional public outreach efforts including issuance of press releases, advertising, social media engagement and mailers. The outreach is being conducted in multiple languages – English, Armenian, Spanish, Korean, and Tagalog. As of the date of this Report, the City will have held four public workshops/pop-ups, of a total of 20 to be held. A listing of the dates, times and locations of the remaining public workshops and pop-ups is set forth in Exhibit 1. A website dedicated to the districting effort, which will include draft 289 of 446
4 c 9
maps, calendar of hearings and workshops dates and pertinent updates, has been established at https://mapglendale.org. The website is available in the following languages: English, Armenian, Spanish, Korean, and Tagalog and addresses questions on the frequently asked questions portion of the website. Along with digital outreach and engagement, a banner will be hung on Verdugo Rd. across from the Glendale Community College Campus. Lastly, the outreach team hired Glendale Youth Alliance to distribute outreach packets to Glendale businesses, specifically bakeries and grocery stores across the City. Stakeholders are welcome to submit public comments and share your thoughts throughout the process by attending district formation meetings, sending a direct email to [email protected], and/or submitting feedback through the contact form on MapGlendale.org.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES

1. The Council can conduct the public hearing and provide the direction for the demographer to prepare draft maps for six council districts.

2. The Council can conduct the public hearing and provide the direction for the demographer to prepare draft maps for six council districts, seven council districts, and/or another alternative.

3. The Council can select an alternative not identified by staff. 290 of 446
5 c 9

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Schedule of Remaining Public Hearings, Workshops, and Pop-Ups 291 of 446

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that regarding the 2nd public hearing for the transition to Council districts held on July 11, 2023, the Council directs staff and the City’s demographer to take the following into consideration as they prepare the draft maps for the transition from the City’s at-large election system to a by-district election system:

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
292 of 446
MapGlendale.org
Follow us
Scan to learn more and for translations:

Traducciones a continuación:

Mga pagsasalin sa ibaba:

Թարգմանությունները ստորև:
아래 번역:

Join our community workshops, submit public comment, and share your thoughts throughout the outreach process to ensure your voice is heard for how future elections happen in Glendale.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
JULY
AUG
OCT
OCT
11 15
10 24

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
6:00 PM

WORKSHOPS
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
AUG
AUG
AUG
AUG
AUG
AUG
SEPT
20 22
22 27
17 19
19 21
30 31
7 BRAND LIBRARY
6:30 PM

GRIFFITH MANOR PARK
10:00 AM

MAPLE PARK
2:00 PM

CHEVY CHASE LIBRARY
6:30 PM

VIRTUAL MEETING
6:30 PM

CHEVY CHASE LIBRARY
10:00 AM

ADULT REC CENTER
2:30 PM

GRIFFITH MANOR PARK
6:30 PM

SPARR HEIGHTS CENTER
6:30 PM

CHEVY CHASE LIBRARY
6:30 PM

GRIFFITH MANOR PARK
6:30 PM

POP-UP EVENTS
JULY
JULY
AUG
AUG
SEPT
15 16
1 25
16 CRUISE NIGHT
Brand Blvd • 5:30 PM

VARDAVAR WATER FESTIVAL
Verdugo Park • 12:00 PM

NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
Pacific Park • 5:00 PM

SUMMER CONCERTS
Brand Park • 7:00 PM

TOUCH-A-TRUCK
At Elks Lodge • 9:00 AM
Help Shape Future
City Council Elections!
@MyGlendale
293 of 446
9d

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Public Hearing on Appeal of Design Review Board’s Approval of Design Review Case No. PDR-2201810 located at 1650 Hazbeth Lane to construct a new 3,239 squarefoot, two-story, single-family residence and a detached 997 square-foot, three-car garage.

1. Motion to sustain the Design Review Board’s decision to approve the Design Review Application with conditions.

2. Motion to continue the matter, directing the City Attorney to draft findings reversing the Design Review Board’s decision and denying the Project.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for July 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This hearing is to consider an appeal of the Design Review Board’s (DRB) February 9, 2023 approval of a Design Review Application to construct a new 3,239 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence and a detached 997 square-foot, three-car garage on a 6.61 acre (287,930 square-foot) lot with an average current slope of approximately

66.4%, zoned R1R II (“Project”). The Project includes a tram (3.5 foot by 5 foot metal passenger basket on approximately 140 linear feet of track) and proposes 6,732 cubic yards (CY) of grading (3,498 CY cut, 2,734 CY fill, 500 CY export).

On February 22, 2023, a neighboring resident filed an appeal requesting the City Council reverse the DRB’s approval of the Design Review Application.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Housing: The Project (as proposed) can contribute to the health of the City through an economically viable infill project that would provide an additional single residential unit to help meet housing demand in the City and the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirements for the region.
294 of 446
2 9d

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council sustain the Design Review Board’s decision to approve Design Review Case No. PDR 2201810. If the Council wishes to reverse the Design Review Board’s decision and deny the Project, a second alternate motion is included to continue this matter for two weeks, without further public notice, and direct the City Attorney to prepare written findings in support of denying the Design Review Board case.

BACKGROUND
Appellant: Pamela Sellers, Neighbor
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 5648-024-013
Zone: R1R II (Restricted Residential, Floor Area District II) Zone Land Use Element: Low Density Residential
Existing Site Characteristics: The subject site is an irregularly shaped lot located at the terminus of Hazbeth Lane. The site is undeveloped and is a vacant hillside lot with an average current slope of approximately 66.4%. The property’s terrain slopes upwards from the street and consists of varied topography that consists of several peaks and valleys. Vehicular and pedestrian access onto the property is provided by a common access paved road across 1653 and 1656 Hazbeth Lane, and pedestrian access to the house is provided by a stairway and a tram constructed adjacent to the concrete stairway set into the hillside which will provide access between the house and the detached garage located downhill from the two-story dwelling.

Surrounding Land Use/Zoning: The Project site is surrounded by R1R zoned properties developed with single-family residences.

Zoning Existing Uses
North R1R II – (Restricted Residential, Floor
Area District II) Zone
Single-family residential
South R1R II – (Restricted Residential, Floor
Area District II) Zone
Single-family residential
East R1R II – (Restricted Residential, Floor
Area District II) Zone
Single-family residential
West R1R II – (Restricted Residential, Floor
Area District II) Zone
Single-family residential Center
295 of 446
3 9d
Project Site R1R II – (Restricted Residential, Floor
Area District II) Zone
Single-family residential
Environmental Determination: The Project is exempt from CEQA review as a Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” exemption pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the Project involves the construction of one single-family dwelling in a residential zone.

Project History:

February 9, 2022 Design Review Application PDR2201810 was submitted.

February 9, 2023 Design Review Board approved the Project.

February 22, 2023 Appeal was filed by the neighbor requesting the City Council reverse the DRB’s approval (Exhibit 9).

ANALYSIS
Appellant – Neighbor
1) Appellant contends the DRB ignored the City’s Hillside Development Review Policy by Section 30.11.040 (A) of the GMC failed to take consideration of criteria (a-e) of the reference code section.

Staff’s Response:

The DRB was provided a staff report and presentation with an analysis and findings.

Below are criteria “a” through “e” (italicized) with staff’s determination. a. Development shall be in keeping with the design objectives in the Glendale Municipal Code, the hillside design guidelines and the landscape Guidelines for hillside development as now adopted and as may be amended from time to time by city council.

The proposed 3,239 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence and a detached 997 square-foot, three-car garage was analyzed by staff for consistency with the Hillside Design Guidelines (adopted November 29, 2011), landscape guidelines and GMC. Staff’s analysis was provided to the DRB via a staff report (dated February 9, 2023) and presentation during the meeting.

Criteria “b – e” below are summaries of staff’s findings presented to the DRB. b. Development shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in terms of size, scale, bulk/mass, roofline orientation, setbacks, and site layout. 296 of 446
4 9d
The surrounding neighborhood is a mixture of one- and two-story single-family residences that range in size from 1,571 sq. ft. - 3,492 sq. ft. and with floor area ratios (FAR) ranging from 0.09 - 0.15. While the proposed dwelling is larger than others in the neighborhood in terms of size and area, the building relates well with the lot as the site because of the large lot (approximately 6.61 acres) such that Project will result with an insignificant FAR of 0.01. Additionally, the property has limited frontage on Hazbeth Lane and the proposed building pad will be located behind several parcels already developed with single-family dwellings accessed by private access way. The building will be sited in the saddle between a knoll and the hillside at the northeast portion of the lot to allow the building mass to follow the upslope terrain as recommended by the Hillside Guidelines. At the closest distances to the adjacent properties, the proposed improvements will be set back 107 feet, 84 feet, 188 feet and 203 feet from the southern, eastern, northwestern, and western property lines, respectively, and comply with the underlying zone setback standards.
c. Site plans shall show preservation of prominent natural features, native vegetation and open space in a manner compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, minimizing alteration of terrain necessary for development.

The site is undeveloped and is a vacant hillside lot with an average current slope of approximately 66.4%. The surface of the site is mostly bare, with patches of wild grasses, plants, and small trees/bushes scattered throughout the property.

There are no protected indigenous tree species on or within 20 feet of the property.

The Project proposes to cut approximately 3,498 cubic (CY) of material from the hillside saddle and fill 2,734 CY at other areas of the property to accommodate transitional slopes for the driveway, fire truck hammerhead turn and building pad for the detached garage. An approximately 500 CY of the remaining material will be exported off-site.

The Project proposes a re-landscaped area of 59,715 square-feet (1.37 acre) of the property and will consist of a variety of California native and Californiafriendly trees, shrubs, and ground cover, such as 22 Coast Live Oaks (24 inch box), 6 California Sycamore (24 inch box), 10 Western Redbud (24 inch box), 225 Orange Red Lantana (5 gallon), 38 California Coffeeberry (5 gallon), 49 Carmel Creeper (5 gallon) and Coyote Bush. The new landscaping will be planted adjacent to proposed buildings, driveway and tram to enhance the property’s aesthetic appearance and blend the development into the natural hillside.
d. Site plans for development of property on steep slopes shall take into account the visual impact on surrounding properties.
297 of 446
5 9d
Majority of the massing of the building is on the first level. The ground floor is 2,678 square-feet and the second level is 561 square-feet. The single-family dwelling’s two-story profile will not be overbearing to the adjacent neighbors because single-family dwelling will be sited 238 feet, 124 feet, 226 feet, 188 feet, and 203 feet away from the neighboring properties to the south, east, north and west, respectively. The two-story volume steps toward the upslope side of the property following the natural topography of the lot. The single-family dwelling will be sited at a sloped saddle and concealed from certain vantages from the southern direction.
e. The architectural style and architectural elements of in-fill development shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood
The adjoining neighborhood, which lies at a distance from the Project site, is comprised of a variety of contemporary Ranch-style single-family dwellings. The proposed house is well designed and compatible with the nearby homes. Finish materials selected will blend in with the surrounding hillside and include quality materials, such as, composite (wood-like) horizontal siding, cementitious fiberboard (Hardie) trims (fascia, window surrounds, and accent bands), river rock base bands, and a standing seam metal roof colored in dark brown.

Materials and colors are consistent on all four sides of the house and the visible exterior of the garage. The windows consist of a variety of operations that are consistent with the style of the building, such as, horizontal sliding, casement, hopper and fixed. The windows and exterior doors are constructed of metal-clad wood colored in dark bronze. An approximately 140 foot (length) tram will be constructed adjacent to the concrete stairway set into the hillside providing access to and from the detached garage downhill from the two-story dwelling. A condition is recommended that the tracks and basket be finished with a color that blends into the colors of the surrounding hillside.
2) Appellant contends the Project is violation of other specific provisions of the law, such as, Sections 30.42.020 (B) and (C), 30.47.030 (I), 13.43.030 (A) (1) and (D), 15.12.067.067 and 16.08.020 of the GMC.

Staff’s Response:
i. Sections 30.42.020 (B) and (C) - Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Findings GMC Section 30.42.020 is no longer applicable. On December 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5818 streamlining of Planning Entitlements and Miscellaneous Revisions and minor clean-ups – which eliminated the requirement of an approval of CUP for any projects involving a property with an average current slope exceeding fifty percent (50%), or where the project grading will exceed 1,500 cubic yards, and revised Section 30.47.030 – (Design Review) Authority for such projects involving properties with an average current slope exceeding fifty percent (50%), or where the project grading will exceed 1,500 298 of 446
6 9d
cubic yards. As a result, the Project is not subject to the findings of 30.42.030 (B) and (C), and are reviewable by the DRB for site planning, design, general layout, and appearance.
ii. Section 30.47.030 (I) – (Design Review) Review and approval of plans and proposals by the review authority.

The subject section grants Design Review the authority to review applications and the power to impose conditions related to site planning, design, general layout, and appearance. And, as stated above, for any project where the property has an average current slope exceeding fifty (50) percent, or where the project grading will exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) cubic yards, the review authority may impose conditions to address impacts related to construction and grading, including, but not limited to, haul routes, protection of indigenous trees and requirements and conditions of approval of any city department that are reasonably related to the public health, safety or welfare. On February 9, 2023, the DRB reviewed and approved the Project plans and associated exhibits with a 4-0 vote with one board member absent.
iii. Sections 13.43.030 (A) (1) and 13.43.030 (D) – (Low impact development standards) Authority.

The purpose of Low Impact Development (LID) standards are to: i) Minimize the percentage of impervious surfaces on land developments by minimizing soil compaction during construction, designing projects to minimize the impervious area footprint, and employing low impact development (LID) design principles to mimic predevelopment hydrology through infiltration, evapotranspiration and rainfall harvest and use; ii) Prevent pollutants of concern from leaving the development site in stormwater as the result of storms, up to and including a water quality design storm event; and iii) Minimize hydromodification impacts to natural drainage systems.

Under Section 2.52.120 (“Powers and Duties”), the authority of the DRB is limited only to appearance, site planning, design and general layout for Design Review applications. Moreover, LID standards are reviewed and enforced by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit, pursuant to GMC 13.43.060(B)(1) (“ . . . LID plan shall be approved prior to issuance of a grading permit for such development project, or when no grading permit is required, prior to the issuance of a building permit . . .”). Accordingly, the DRB is not the appropriate review authority for LID standards, which will be reviewed under a separate process to ensure the standards are being met, and the DRB approval of the Project is not in violation of Chapter 13.43. 299 of 446
7 9d
iv. Section 15.12.067 (A)– Hillside design guidelines (Grading in Hillside Areas and Excavation Blasting).

The cited section of the GMC states the City Engineer or Building Official shall not issue a grading permit for a grading plan which is inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the hillside design guidelines. This section of the code does not authorize the City Engineer or Building Official to act as the design review authority granted to the DRB by Section 30.47.030 (I). On February 9, 2023, the DRB reviewed and approved the Project plans and associated exhibits for consistency. As an additional check, during Building & Safety plan check, the City Engineer and/or Building Official will verify grading plans for consistency with the DRB’s approval, as well as applicable codes.
v. Section 16.08.020 - Secondary ridgeline areas, restrictions in The Project site does not consist of a primary or secondary ridgeline. As a result, this section of the does not apply.
3) Appellant contends the DRB gave no consideration to safety issues of building the house on the knoll.

Staff’s Response:

The Project was reviewed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and was determined to qualify for an exemption from any further CEQA review as a Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” because the Project involves the construction of one single-family dwelling in a residential zone. No unusual circumstances exist, and no aspect of the Project will result in a significant effect on the environment. There are no safety issues related to the project that present significant environmental impacts.

As part of staff review of the application, the Project was routed to various departments, such as the Building & Safety Division, Public Works – Engineering Division and Glendale Water & Power for comment (Exhibit 7). Standard comments were received with requirements upon submittal of plans for building plan check. All necessary permits (i.e., building, fire, engineering, grading, etc.) will be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction must be in compliance with the Glendale Building Code and all other applicable regulations. No comments were received in terms of safety issues or other impacts related to construction of the house on the knoll. 4) Appellant contends the City Council had reversed the Zoning Administrator and Hearing Officer’s approval decisions concerning three separate CUP’s concerning grading during 2008, 2010 and 2012. The appellant further contends the Project is essentially identical to the 2012 CUP application and the location of the residence, garage and tram have not changed. The City Council specifically outlined their findings on why the Project was not compatible with the area, scope and magnitude of the Project raises many safety and feasibility questions and conflicts with the Hillside Design Guidelines.
300 of 446
8 9d
Staff’s Response:

During 2008, 2010 and 2012, three separate CUP application approvals were reversed by the City Council. In 2012, the City Council overturned the Planning Commission’s approval decision and denied the CUP because the associated structures and facilities were found to be detrimental to the public health or safety, the general welfare, or the environment in contravention of GMC 30.42.030 (B) for the following reasons:
• Significant grading (4,760 cubic yards) for the house, detached garage and tram system will cause degradation to the site and the hillside. • The house will still be prominently featured on the hillside and have negative aesthetic and visual impacts on surrounding properties. • While some level of development on the site is appropriate, the amount of grading and driveway construction necessary to place the house where the applicant proposes to build it creates too much conflict with the goals and policies of the GMC and Hillside Design Guidelines.
• While the Council expressed no opinion on the feasibility or appropriateness of any alternative locations for the Project, the City Council finds that there is important conflicting information presented in the record regarding economic and engineering feasibility of the building on the so-called “flat pad” at the bottom of the hills. Just by way of example and without limiting any future consideration, it is noted that the building on the so called “flat pad” at the bottom of the hill of Hazbeth Lane has potential for construction of a new home. Consideration of such issues will have to be left to a future application, but it is noted that the record in this matter and on the previous application on this Project site provide evidentiary support that building on the flat pad is feasible from an economic and engineering standpoint.

On December 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5818 streamlining of Planning Entitlements – which eliminated the requirement of an approval of CUP for any projects involving a property with an average current slope exceeding fifty percent (50%), or where the project grading will exceed 1,500 cubic yards, and revised Section

30.47.030 – establishing Design Review to be the review authority for such projects.

While the current Project is not subject to CUP findings – which were the basis for denial of the 2008, 2010 and 2012, three separate CUP applications – on February 9, 2023, the DRB reviewed the Project in terms of grading, site planning, design, general layout, and appearance. Under its authority, the DRB reviewed the Project’s scope of work against the required criteria of the Hillside Design Guidelines and municipal code and approved the Project.

As specified within Section 30.47.100 (Design Review Appeals), all appeals shall be de novo in that an independent reexamination of the matter shall be made.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.
301 of 446
9 9d

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the action recommended in this report, other than the additional property tax or other revenue that may be generated if the Project is approved and ultimately developed in the future.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744, Exhibit 8 is attached and contains the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest or more in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Project is exempt from CEQA review as a Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” exemption pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the Project involves the construction of one single-family dwelling in a residential zone. There is no reasonable possibility that this project will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council has the following options:
1: Sustain the Design Review Board’s decision to approve the Design Review application with conditions.
2: Sustain the Design Review Board’s decision to approve the Design Review application with additional/removed and/or amended conditions. 3: Reverse the Design Review Board’s decision and deny the Design Review application.
4: Consider any other alternatives to design review submission not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Dennis Joe, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:

Jay Platt, Principal Urban Designer
Erik Krause, Deputy Director of Community Development
302 of 446
10 9d
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS

1. Reduced Plans and Staff Report (DRB, February 9, 2023)

2. Photos of Existing Property and Neighborhood

3. Location Map

4. Material Board

5. Tram Schematic Diagram and Photos of Existing Installations

6. Public Comment (to DRB, February 9, 2023)

7. Interdepartmental Comments

8. Conflict of Interest Statement and Campaign Disclosure Form

9. Appeal Form (completed by the appellant)

10. DRB Record of Decision date February 9, 2023
303 of 446
MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____________________________, seconded by Council Member _________________________, that upon review and consideration of all documents, materials and exhibits relative to the appeal of the Design Review Board approval with conditions of Design Review Case No. PDR-2201810, located at 1650 Hazbeth Lane, (the “Design Review Case”), and after having conducted a public hearing on said appeal pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (“GMC”), and receiving testimony, the City Council of the City of Glendale, California, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby SUSTAINS the Design Review Board’s decision to APPROVE the Design Review Case with conditions (“Project”), based on the findings and conclusions set forth in the June 13, 2023 staff report from the Director of Community Development, including any attachments thereto, and including additional condition(s) set forth below in this motion. Further, the Council hereby adopts, and incorporates herein by this reference, the analysis, findings, conclusions and conditions of the Design Review Board in its Record of Decision dated February 9, 2023 (Exhibit 10 to the staff report to Council).

DRB CONDITIONS:

1. The tram passenger basket and tracks are to be painted with a natural color to blend into the hillside, such as brown or grey-brown.

2. Prior to building plan check submittal, proposed locations of the lighting fixtures are to be provided on revised plans for staff review. Use larger sized plants at the pool deck to ensure adequate buffering between this area and the neighbors to the north.

ADDITIONAL COUNCIL-IMPOSED CONDITONS:

3. Adel Luzuriaga (Applicant/Owner), and their respective successors; owners by deed, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure or otherwise; assigns; and/or any real party in interest with an interest in the property that is the subject of this approval, and/or with an interest in the Project site, that is named as a party in any suit (hereinafter collectively the “Developer”), agree to and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Glendale (the “City”), and each of its agents, officers, council members, commissioners, attorneys, employees and representatives (the “Indemnities”) from any claim, action or proceeding brought against the City and/or the Indemnities to attack, set aside, void or annul any City land use or California Environmental Quality Act approval for the Project. The Developer agrees to use legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City. The foregoing shall include, without limitation, payment of all damages awarded against the City and/or the Indemnities, if any, costs of suit, attorney’s fees, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action 304 of 446
or proceeding. In the event that a claim, action or proceeding referenced herein is brought, the City shall promptly notify the Developer of the existence of the claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of such claim, action or proceeding. As used herein, “land use approval” shall refer to decisions of the City approving requests of applicants for planning permits, including, but not limited to, general plan amendments, annexations, zone changes, zoning ordinance text amendments, tentative maps, vesting tentative maps, tentative parcel maps, reversions to acreage, final maps, final modifications or amendments, time extensions, parcel map waivers, lot line adjustments, boundary line adjustments, certificates of compliance, conditional certificates of compliance, design review approval(s), development agreements, conditional use permits, conditional use permit modifications, conditional use permit extensions, variances, variance modifications, precise plan of design, specific plans, density bonus review/housing plan applications, sign permits, parking reduction permits, site plans, temporary use permits, any administrative or discretionary permit pertaining to a land use approval and/or any accompanying California Environmental Quality Act determination(s) pertaining to the type of approval referred to in this section, and any other similar approval.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
305 of 446
MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded by
Council Member that upon review and consideration of
all documents, materials, exhibits, and testimony relative to the appeal of Design Review Case No. PDR-2201810, located at 1650 Hazbeth Lane, and after conducting a public hearing on said appeal pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (“GMC”), and receiving testimony, the City Council, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby REVERSES the Design Review Board’s decision and DENIES the design review case. The City Council hereby continues this matter for two weeks until the June 27, 2023 City Council meeting, without further public notice, and directs the City Attorney to prepare written findings in support of denying the Design Review Case.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
306 of 446
PROJECT AREA DATA : LOT AREA

6.61 acres - 287,930 HOUSE 1st FLOOR SQ.FT. HOUSE 2nd FLOOR

TOTAL HOUSE FLOOR AREA
(GROSS)
2678 SQ.FT. 561 SQ.FT. 3239 SQ.FT.
3 CAR GARAGE

TOTAL FLOOR AREA
997 SQ.FT. 4236 FLOOR AREA SQ.FT. RATIO: 4236 / 287,930 =

0.0 15 MAIN HOUSE COVERAGE GARAGE COVERAGE

ENTRY PORTICO COVERAGE

TOTAL COVERAGE
3862 SQ.FT. 1077 SQ.FT
288 SQ.FT
.5227 SQ.FT.

LOT COVERAGE: 5227 / 287,930 = 0.018

LANDSCAPE AREA

1.8 % 59,715 UNGRADED SQ.FT. OPEN SPACE
6 acres 284,504 SQ.FT. RATIO OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO SITE

20. 2%
KNOLLAA5
BA5
TERR ACE EL.90 7
B D
0 2' 4' 8'
TERR ACE EL.90 7
2 1ST FLOOR EL.907 .5'
XW
C 2 WAT ER

TAN STO K REY
MEC
H
ARE HOU A SE5 C 11
10 A6
9 F E
8 7
6 5
4 5x6"=2'-6" 3 GAR AGE
2 1 ENTR Y

PORTI CO
CA6 EL.8 50
TURNAR
B OUND
A5

38.1 8°
A
A5 GLENMONT PRIVAT E DRIVE

REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT
E12/1
2/22

SCAL PROPOSED
E:

SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE: 9/18/ 22
SHEET TITLE: SITE
SHEET NUMBER: PLAN A
SHEE T 0OF
307 of 446
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE
terra SKYLIGHTS
ceel.9 07.0
TW EL TW EL 908.0 912.0
STANDIN G SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN
LOCK - 15'-6 VINTAGE 1/2" 6'- 3" 6'- 3" 8'-2 1/2"
2'- 6"
slope down
4:12
slope down
4:12 STANDIN G SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN
LO3CK - VINTAGE
B D 4
SOLAR ba PANELS
th
5'- 8"
slope down
4:12 12'-6" x12'-6" +
slope down
4:12
3'
STANDIN G SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN

LOCK - VINTAGE
mas ter bedr
oom
1 8' 12' 2. 0
terra
ceel.9 07.0
slope down
4:12
slope down
4:12 17'x1 7'-6" TW EL 12' 908.0 -4"
SOLAR PANELS STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN

LOCK - VINTAGE
clo set 14' x14'
2 roof plan 4- 0x6- 8 terra
ceel. 907. 0
scale: 1/8" = 1'- 0" pan try2- 4x8- 0
F offi 17'- ce 6"x14 '
kitc hen 14'- 6"x13 '
hills ide slop
e
dow
n
11'- 55/64
"
19'-2 9/64" living / dining 20'x 30' XBW
C balc
ony
E TW EL 908.0 MAIN FLOOR EL. 907.5'
bedr
oom 14 x 13'-6"
Water Tank & mecha nica equipm ent are el. 908
6 terra
ceel.9 07.0
open
loft 11'-6 x 13'" clos et 6'-5" x 6'-3" 2- 8x8- 0
2- 8x6- 8
tub bedr
/
oom 12 x 13'-6"
ent
ry
2-8x6-8 laun dry 8'-4" x 6'-6"4- 0x6- 8
sho wood wer deck el.907 .0
bathr
oom 9'-9" x 7'-6"
terra
ceel.9 07.0 5 W D

REVISI ONS
MARK F E F F DAT 30'E
-3" 12/1 TW EL 2/22
912.0 first floor plan
second scale: 1/4" = 1'- floor plan
0" 2678 sq.ft.
scale: 1/4" = 1'- 0" 561 sq.ft.

TW EL 918.0
TW EL 924.0
SCAL E:

DAT
E:
0 2' 4' 8
'
0 2' 4'8
' terra
ceel.9 07.0
22 x 6" = 11' 9/18
SHEET TITLE:/22
FLOOR

SHEET PLANS
NUMBER:A
11'-10 1/2" 6'- 0" 18'-1 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" SHE
ET 1OF
308 of 446
south elevatio
n
scale: 1/4" = 1'- 0"
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE HARDITRIM FACIA - 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 2 EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR - IPE HARDITRIM BANDING - 4/4 RUSTICCOLOR: TIMBER BARK
4 1
2 4 METAL CLAD WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN EXTERIOR SIDING: LOCK - VINTAGE FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR HARDITRIM - IPE BANDING - 4/4 RUSTICCOLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 1 2 BASE OF 2 EXTERIOR WALLS: CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE 4 TW EL 924.0
12 4
1 1 2 2
3 4 TW EL 4 918.0
TW EL 912.0
TW EL 912.0
RAILING: FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME TERRACE EL 907.0
TW EL 908.0 DECKING: FIBERCON CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR: IPE RETAINING WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND STAI RS

TRAM WAY
north elevatio
n
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN scale: LOCK - VINTAGE 1/4" = 1'- 0" 1 2 HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2
4 4 HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON
METAL CLAD WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
COLOR - IPE HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 2
1 2
1 4 4
2 4 BASE OF EXTERIOR WALLS: CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE 1 2 3
RAILING: FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME WATER TANK COLOR: SERENGETI SAND

REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT 12/1 E
2/22
TW EL 908.0
RETAINING WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND
SCAL E:

DATE: 9/18/ 22
SHEET TITLE:ELEVA

SHEET TIONS
NUMBER: A
2 a
SHE
ET OF
309 of 446
south elevatio
nscale: 1/4" = 1'-0" STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE HARDITRIM FACIA - 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 2 EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR - IPE HARDITRIM BANDING - 4/4 RUSTICCOLOR: TIMBER BARK
4 1
2 4 METAL CLAD WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN EXTERIOR SIDING: LOCK - VINTAGE FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR HARDITRIM - IPE BANDING - 4/4 RUSTICCOLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 1 2 BASE OF 2 EXTERIOR WALLS: CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE 4 4
1 1 2 1 2 2
3 4 4
RAILING: FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD RETAINING WALLS: FRAME COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND DECKING: FIBERCON CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR: IPE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE north elevatio nscale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 2 HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2
4 4 HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON
METAL CLAD WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
COLOR - IPE HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 2
1 2
1 4 4
2 4 BASE OF EXTERIOR WALLS: CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE 1 2 3
RAILING: FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME WATER TANK COLOR: SERENGETI SAND REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT 12/1 E
2/22 RETAINING WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND
SCAL E:

DATE: 9/18/ 22
SHEET TITLE: COL ELEVA OR
T IONS
SHEET NUMBER: A
2 b
SHE
ET OF
310 of 446
Door Legend ID 1 2 4 5 6
Typ
e
Double Bi- Parting Sliding DoorTriple Sliding DoorFrench Swing w/ SidelitesFrench Swing w SidelightsTriple Sliding Quanti Door ty
W x H Size
1 1 2 1 1
16'x 8'12'x 8'2'- 8"x8'3'x8
'
10'x 8' 2'-8" 2'- 8" 2'-8"
2' 3' 2'
3D Front View
"U" Value
SHG F

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 Window 5 Legend ID A B C D E
Case ment
2 F
Case ment
4 G
Fixe
d west
5 elevatio
nscale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Typ
e
Horizontal Sliders Horizontal Sliders Horizontal Sliders Awni ng STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
2 COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE
Quanti ty
W x H Size
1 3 3
12'x 5'10'x 5'8'x5
'
7'x 2'3'x 5'2'x5
'
4'x2
' HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
3D Front HARDITRIM View
FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR - IPE "U" Factor
SHG F

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5

0.3 2

0.2 5
1 2 4
1 2
G1 G2 G3
Hollow Metal
2 5' 5' 4 RAILING: FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME Upward Acting Sectional Metal Panel Garage Door Upward Acting Sectional METAL CLAD Metal Panel Garage Door WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE 1 1
18'x 7'9'x 7'3'x6'- HARDITRIM 8"
BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
TW EL 924.0 1
2 1 1 2 2 BASE OF EXTERIOR WALLS: CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE 4 4 4 SKYLI
1 GHTS
TW EL 2
918.0 3
WAT ER COLOR: TANK SERENGETI SAND
TW EL TW EL 912.0 912.0 TWEL 908.0 not
e: TERR ACE EL 907.0
Doors & Windows are
to be
RETAINING WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND
Anderson metal clad wood frame
"E" series - dark bronze exterior
east elevati
onscale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK EXTERIOR WALLS AT FIREPLACE CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2
1 4 2 METAL CLAD 4
WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR RAILING: FEENEY - IPE

STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME
5' 5'
TW EL 1 924.0 2
1 4
2 4
TW EL 918.0

REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT 12/1 E
2/22 TW EL 912.0
EL 907.0 SCAL RETAININ E: G WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND DECKING: FIBERCON CONCORDIA HORIZON COLO R: IPE
DATE: 9/18/ 22
SHEET TITLE:ELEVA

SHEET TIONS
TRAM NUMBER: WAY A
3 a
SHE
ET OF
311 of 446
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN west LOCK - VINTAGE elevatio nscale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON 1
2 COLOR - IPE 4
1 2 4 RAILING: FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME METAL CLAD WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 2 1
2 BASE OF EXTERIOR WALLS: CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE 4 4
WATER TANK COLOR: SERENGETI SAND
RETAINING WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
east elevati
onscale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR WALLS AT FIREPLACE CULTURED STONE - RIVERROCK COLOR: LAKE TAHOE HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC
COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2
1 4 2 METAL CLAD 4
WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING

CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR
RAILING: FEENEY - IPE
STAINLESS STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME 1
2 1 4
2 4
RETAININ G WALLS: COLORED CONCRETE: SERENGETI SAND
DECKING: FIBERCON CONCORDIA HORIZON COLO R: IPE

REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT 12/1 E
2/22
TRAM WAY SCAL E:

DATE: 9/18/ 22
SHEET TITLE: COL ELEVA OR
T IONS
SHEET NUMBER: A
3 b
SHE
ET OF
312 of 446
21' -4" 2
4'
22' -4"

HARDITRIM FACIA
4/4 RUSTIC
COLOR: TIMBER BARK
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGEHARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 2
entry portico
1 2
4 HARDITRIM 4
BANDING 4/4 RUSTI C
COLOR: TIMBER BARK
6x6 POSTS COLOR: TIMBER BARK 2 car
garage el. 850'
2 car
gar age
tra 1 car
garage m
garage east elevation scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"

PANELED GARAGE DOOR
COLOR: TIMBER BARK
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING
CONCORDIA HORIZON STANDING SEAM - COLOR - IPE METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2
entry portico
6x6 POSTS COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2 21' -4" 3'- 8"
4 HARDITRIM 4
BANDING 4/4 RUSTI C
COLOR: TIMBER BARK 1 car
garage el. 850'
2 car
gar age
tra 1 car
garage m
garage east elevation scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"

PANELED GARAGE DOOR
COLOR: TIMBER BARK
2 5' STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF METAL CLAD WINDOW FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING

CONCORDIA HORIZON
- COLOR - IPE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN garage LOCK - VINTAGE floor plan
COLOR: WESTERN HARDITRIM LOCK - VINTAGE FACIA: 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 2
1 997 2 sq.ft. 4 4 6x6 POSTS COLOR: TIMBER BARK
1 0 2' 2 4' 4
8 '
tra
entry m
portico RAILING: FEENEY STAINLES S STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME 2 car
gar age
tra
mplatf orm
1 car
garage
HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK

RETAINING WALLS - COLORED CONCRETE - SERENGETI SAND
garage south elevation scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR - IPE

REVISI ONS
MARK

DAT METAL CLAD WINDOW E
FRAME COLOR: DARK BRONZE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE
12/1
2/22
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR: WESTERN LOCK - VINTAGE 1 2 1
2 HARDITRIM FACIA: 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK 6x6 POST S HARDITRIM FACIA 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
4 4
1 2
COLOR: TIMBER BARK 4
SCAL E:
tra
m DATE: 9/18/ 22
entry portico SHEET GARAGE TITLE: & ROOF RAILING: FEENEY STAINLES S STEEL CABLE IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME 2 car
gar age
PLAN tra
mplatf orm
1 car
garage
SHEET NUMBER:A
4 HARDITRIM BANDING 4/4 RUSTIC COLOR: TIMBER BARK
garage south elevation scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"

RETAINING WALLS - COLORED CONCRETE - SERENGETI SAND
EXTERIOR SIDING: FIBERCON CLADDING CONCORDIA HORIZON COLOR - IPE SHE
ET OF
313 of 446
knoll - el. 930
2nd flr el.91 7.5'
TW EL plan 924.0
ter 5'
TW EL 918.0 plan 1st ter floor el.90 7.5'
5' TW EL 912.0 terr
ace terr
ace TW EL 912.0 el.907' EL 907.0
sectio n A/A5 scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"
main house el. 907.5'
TW EL908. 0
EL 907.0
TW EL908. 0 site stairs & tramw
ay
entry portico REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT 12/1 E
gar 2/22
age
el. 850' SCAL E:

DATE: 9/18/ 22
drive
way
SHEET TITLE: SECT
SHEET NUMBER: IONS A
5 sectio n B/A5 scale: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
SHE
ET OF
314 of 446
12 12
4 4
5' 5'
TW EL 12 924.0
12 4
4 TW EL 918.0
TW EL 912.0
EL 907.0

TRAM WAY

24.7 5°
sectio n C/A6 scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"

REVISI ONS
MARK
DAT 12/1 E
2/22
SCAL E:

DATE: 9/18/ 22
SHEET TITLE: SECT
SHEET NUMBER: IONS A
SHE
ET 6OF
315 of 446
316 of 446
317 of 446
318 of 446
PROPOSED 2- STOREY

STUCCO RESIDENCE

COVER EDENTR Y

PORTI CO

LANDING TOENTER TRAM

BASIS OF BEARINGS BENCH MARK
8 1 bel 1
ow.

OWN
ER Know
what's Callbefore you
dig.
319 of 446

COVER EDENTR Y

PORTIC O

LANDING TOENTER TRAM

BASIS OF BEARINGS

BENCH MARK
8 1 bel 1
ow.

Know
what's
OWN Callbefore you ER
dig.
320 of 446
COVER
ED
ENTR
Y

PORTIC O

LANDING TO

ENTER TRAM

COVER EDENT RY PORTI CO

LANDIN G TO ENTER TRAM

BASIS OF BEARINGS

BENCH MARK
8 1 bel 1
ow.

Know
what' s
OWN Callbefore you ER
dig. 321 of 446
GARAG
E
FF = 850.00 DRIVEW AY

SECTIO N A
SECTIO
N B
GARAG
E
FF = 850.00

PORTIC O
FF = 850.00

DRIVEW AY GARAG E
FF = 850.00
SECTIO
N D

SECTIO N C
8 1 bel 1
ow.

Know
what's OWN Callbefore you ER
dig.
322 of 446
323 of 446
COLOR CODE EARTHWORK QUANTITY 15' - 3' FILL
3' - 0 FILL
0 - 5' CUT
5' - 17' CUT
8 1 1 OWN
ER 324 of 446
325 of 446
326 of 446
327 of 446
328 of 446
329 of 446
330 of 446
331 of 446
332 of 446
333 of 446
CITY OF GLENDALE, DESIGN REVIEW STAFF CA REPORT – SINGLE FAMILY February 9, 2023 1650 Hazbeth Lane Hearing Date Addr
ess Design Review Board (DRB) 5648- Review 024-013 Type APN PDR22 01810 Adel Luzuriag a
Case Number Appli cant Dennis Joe, Senior Planner Adel Luzuriag a
Case Planner Own
er
Project Summary Applicant proposes to construct a new 3,239 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence and a detached 997 square-foot, three-car garage on a 6.61 acre (287,930 square-foot) lot with an average current slope of approximately 66.4%, zoned R1R II. The project includes a tram (3.5 foot by 5 foot metal passenger basket on approximately 140 linear feet of track) and proposes 6,732 cubic yards (CY) of grading (3,498 CY cut, 2,734 CY fill, 500 CY export).

Environment al Review The project is exempt from CEQA review as a Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” exemption pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the project involves the construction of one single-family dwelling in a residential zone
Existing Property/Backgr ound The subject site is an irregularly shaped lot located at the terminus of Hazbeth Lane. The site is undeveloped and is a vacant hillside lot with an average current slope of approximately 66.4%. The property’s terrain slopes upwards from the street and consists of varied topography that consists of several peaks and valleys. Vehicular and pedestrian access onto the property is provided by a common access paved road across 1653 and 1656 Hazbeth Lane.

Staff Recommendation Approve with Conditions
______________________________________
__________________________________ Last Date Reviewed / Decision First time submittal for final review. 334 of 446
Zone: RIR FAR District: II Although this design review does not convey final zoning approval, the project has been reviewed for consistency with the applicable Codes and no inconsistencies have been identified. Active/Pending Permits and Approvals None. Site Slope and Grading 50% or greater current average slope: The project will include 6,232 cubic yards (CY) of grading (3,498 CY cut, 2,734 CY fill, 500 CY export). Neighborho od Survey Avera ge of Range of Properties within 300 linear feet of subject property Properties within 300 linear feet of subject propertySubject Property Propos 23,00 al 1 SF 10,870 SF – 37,460 SF 287,93 Lot size 0 SF Setbac k
House size
30 Ft 2,602 SF0.123 Ft – 115 Ft 1,571 SF – 3,492 SF 0.09 – 0.15162 Ft 3,239 SF0.01 Floor Area Ratio
Number of stories
Primarily 1 story 1 and 2 stories 2 storie
s
DESIGN ANALYSIS ______________________________________
__________________________________ Site Planning Are the following items satisfactory and compatible with the project site and surrounding area? Building Location ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Setbacks of buildings on site Prevailing setbacks on the street ☐ Building and decks follow topography Garage Location and Driveway ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Predominant pattern on block ☐ Compatible with primary structure ☐ Permeable paving material ☐ Decorative paving 2 335 of 446
Landscape Design ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Complementary to building design ☐ Maintains existing trees when possible ☐ Maximizes permeable surfaces ☐ Appropriately sized and located Walls and Fences ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Appropriate style/color/material ☐ Perimeter walls treated at both sides ☐ Retaining walls minimized ☐ Appropriately sized and located
Determination of Compatibility: Site Planning The proposed site planning is appropriate, as modified by any proposed conditions, to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons: • The proposed two-story dwelling will be centrally located on the 6.61 acre property and sited above the slope saddle between a knoll and the upsloping hillside at the northeast portion of the lot. • The project’s buildings and structures, at their closest distances to the adjacent properties, will be set back 107 feet, 84 feet, 188 feet and 203 feet from the southern, eastern, northwestern, and western property lines, respectively, and comply with the underlying zone setback standards. • The project proposes 6,732 cubic yards (CY) of grading - which approximately 3,498 CY of material is cut from the saddle of the hillside and 2,734 CY will be filled at other areas of the property to accommodate transitional slopes for the driveway to the detached three car garage and a hammerhead turnaround for the fire department. Approximately 500 CY of the remaining material will be exported off- site. ______________________________________
__________________________________ Massing and Scale Are the following items satisfactory and compatible with the project site and surrounding area? Building Relates to its Surrounding Context ☒If “no” select from yes ☐ n/a ☐ no below and explain: ☐ Appropriate proportions and transitions 3 336 of 446
☐ Relates to predominant pattern ☐ Impact of larger Building Relates to building minimized Existing Topography ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ noIf “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Form and profile follow topography ☐ Alteration of existing land form minimized ☐ Retaining walls terrace with slope Consistent Architectural Concept ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no
If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Concept governs massing and height Scale and Proportion ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Scale and proportion fit context ☐ Articulation avoids overbearing forms ☐ Appropriate solid/void relationships ☐ Entry and major features well located ☐ Avoids sense of monumentality Roof Forms ☒ yes ☐ n/a If “no” select from ☐ no
below and explain: ☐ Roof reinforces design concept ☐ Configuration appropriate to context Determination of Compatibility: Mass and Scale The proposed massing and scale are appropriate, as modified by any proposed conditions, to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons: • Majority of the massing of the building is on the first level, which the ground floor is 2,678 square-feet and the second level is 561 square-feet. • The single-family dwelling’s two-story profile will not be overbearing to the adjacent neighbors because single-family dwelling will be sited 238 feet, 124 feet, 226 feet, 188 feet, and 203 feet away from the neighboring properties to the south, east, north and west, respectively. • The two-story volume steps toward the upslope side of the property following the natural topography of the lot. This quality is enhanced by the relatively small size of the upper floor. • The single-family dwelling will be sited at a sloped saddle and concealed from certain vantages from the southern direction. 4 337 of 446
______________________________________
__________________________________ Design and Detailing Are the following items satisfactory and compatible with the project site and surrounding area? Overall Design and Detailing ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Consistent architectural concept ☐ Proportions appropriate to project and surrounding neighborhood ☐ Appropriate solid/void relationships Entryway ☒ yes ☐ n/a If “no” select from ☐ no below and explain: ☐ Well integrated into design ☐ Avoids sense of monumentality ☐ Design provides appropriate focal point ☐ Doors appropriate Windows ☒to design yes ☐ n/a If “no” select from ☐ no below and explain: ☐ Appropriate to overall design ☐ Placement appropriate to style ☐ Recessed in wall, when appropriate Privacy ☒ yes ☐ n/a If “no” select from ☐ no below and explain: ☐ Consideration of views from “public” rooms and balconies/decks ☐ Avoid windows facing adjacent windows Finish Materials and Color ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Textures and colors reinforce design ☐ High-quality, especially facing the street ☐ Respect articulation and façade hierarchy ☐ Wrap corners and terminate appropriately 5 338 of 446
Paving Materials ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☐ Decorative material at entries/driveways ☐ Permeable paving when possible ☐ Material and color related to design Lighting, Equipment, Trash, and Drainage ☐ yes ☐ n/a ☒
noIf “no” select from below and explain: ☒ Light fixtures appropriately located/avoid spillover and over-lit facades ☐ Light fixture design appropriate to project ☐ Equipment screened and well located ☐ Trash storage out of public view ☐ Downspouts appropriately located ☐ Vents, utility connections integrated
Prior to building plan check submittal, with design, avoid primary facades proposed locations of the lighting fixtures are tobe provided on revised plans for staff review. Ancillary Structures ☒ yes ☐ n/a ☐ no If “no” select from below and explain: ☒ Design consistent with primary structure ☐ Design and materials of gates complement primary structure An approximately 140 foot (length) tram will be constructed adjacent to the concrete stairway set into the hillside providing access to and from the detached garage downhill from the two-story dwelling. The tram’s tracks will be constructed above the hillside and parallel with the grade. The metal passenger basket is 3.5 feet (width) by 5 feet (length) and approximately 4 feet (height).

While schematic drawings for the trams do not specify the color of the accessory structure, a condition is suggested that the passenger basket and tracks are to be painted with a natural color to blend into the hillside, such as, brown or grey-brown. 6 339 of 446
Determination of Compatibility: Design and Detailing The proposed design and detailing are appropriate, as modified by any proposed conditions, to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons: • Exterior finish materials selected blend in with the surrounding hillside and include quality materials, such as, composite (wood- like) horizontal siding, cementitious fiberboard (Hardie) trims (fascia, window surrounds, and accent bands), river rock base bands, and a standing seam metal roof colored in dark brown. Materials and colors are consistent on all four sides of the house and the visible exterior of the garage.
• The windows consist of a variety of operations that are consistent with the style of the building, such as, horizontal sliding, casement, hopper and fixed. The windows and exterior doors are constructed of metal- clad wood colored in dark bronze. • An approximately 140 foot (length) tram will be constructed adjacent to the concrete stairway set into the hillside providing access to and from the detached garage downhill from the two-story dwelling. A condition is recommended that the tracks and basket be finished with a color that blends into the colors of the surrounding hillside. • The adjoining neighborhood, which lies at a distance from the subject house, is comprised of a variety of contemporary Ranch-style single-family dwellings. The proposed house is well designed and compatible with the nearby homes. ______________________________________ __________________________________ Recommendation / Draft Record of Decision Based on the above analysis, staff recommends Approval with Conditions. This determination is based on the implementation of the following recommended conditions: Condit ions 1. The tram passenger basket and tracks are to be painted with a natural color to blend into the hillside, such as brown or grey- brown. 2. Prior to building plan check submittal, proposed locations of the lighting fixtures are to be provided on revised plans for staff review. ______________________________________
__________________________________
Attachments 1. Reduced Plans 2. Photos of Existing Property and Neighborhood 3. Location Map 4. Material Board 5. Tram Schematic Diagram and Photos of Existing Installations 6. Public Comment 7. Interdepartmental Comments 7 340 of 446
341 of 446
Entry to 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D) in front of 1656 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel C) 342 of 446
Entry to 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D) in front of 1656 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel C) 343 of 446
Inside Entry to 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D)
344 of 446
Inside Entry to 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D)
345 of 446
Inside Entry to 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D)
346 of 446
View of 1650 site pad (SADDLE) from Glenmont Rd.
347 of 446
CLOSE UP View of 1650 site pad (saddle) from Glenmont Rd. 348 of 446
CLOSE UP View of 1650 site pad (saddle) from Glenmont Rd. 349 of 446
View of 1650 flat pad & Hazbeth Knoll. from Glenmont Rd. 350 of 446 EXIT from 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D) in front of 1656 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel C) to the right 351 of 446
EXIT from 1650 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel D) in front of 1656 Hazbeth Lane (Parcel C) to the right 352 of 446
353 of 446
354 of 446
18 PHOTO SURVEY MAP
APN: 5648-024-013
GLENDALE, CA 91202
300 LINEAR FEET
DATE: 01-26-2023
Centerp♦1nt
I Radius Maps
Of:
26 "' <D
c,
"-
'<"
118.86
POR. OF LOT
39 40
.;< .._
<,
� �
lo ._b
53 30.48 o0:'-"

14.65 P.M. 1054
PM.B. 27 - 89 -90
PM. 1054
P.M.B. 27 - 89 -90
·o·
"D'
P.M. 1054
P.M.B. 27 - 89 -90
,... w w 0::

C: t;;
� N W 0:: :::, ,...
i'
'C'
/ �

22.56 165.61
168.83
8 'D'
8 .,
� 2
?} :il g
'
165.83
2 \
\
198.82
3 176.22
4 154,12
9 110.57
10 V. BEAU
"A"
25-59
43 13
Fv. BE:Auo 14
134.03
85 ,_ '·--------
POR. OF W 1/2 SEC.

V. BEAUDRY'S MTS
M.R. 36 -67 -71
., "'
4 240.58
3 232.86
2 205.03
161.75
205.63
POR. OF LOT
1 16

5.56 Of pCLpOR-
'
i
\
� r
·,
\
'1
i
1�
8 1;,<T
TRACT NO. 24858
M.B. 654-80-82
9 10
19_<{/ "'� i
'S.10 '°) .. ______ _

82.02 <::::: 108.86
SCALE: 1" = 100'

VACANT LAND
1 2
3 5
6 7
4 8
2 STORIES
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 VACANT LAND
16 17
18 19
20 21
23 22
24 2 STORIES
2 STORIES
2 STORIES
355 of 446
Photo 1 – 1617 Hazbeth Ln
356 of 446
Photo 2 – 1625 Hazbeth Ln
357 of 446
Photo 3 – 1635 Hazbeth Ln
358 of 446
Photo 4 – 1641 Hazbeth Ln
359 of 446
Photo 5 – 1649 Hazbeth Ln
360 of 446
Photo 6 – 1653 Hazbeth Ln
361 of 446
Photo 6 – 1656 Hazbeth Ln
362 of 446
Photo 8 – 1636 Hazbeth Ln
363 of 446
Photo 9 – 1616 Hazbeth Ln
364 of 446
Photo 10 – 1622 Glenmont Dr
365 of 446
Photo 11 – 1616 Glenmont Dr
366 of 446
Photo 12 – 1606 Glenmont Dr
367 of 446
Photo 13 – 1600 Glenmont Dr
368 of 446
Photo 14 – 1592 Glenmont Dr
369 of 446
Photo 15 – 1588 Glenmont Dr
370 of 446
Photo 16 – 1819 Deermont Rd
371 of 446
Photo 17 – 1831 Deermont Rd
372 of 446
Photo 18 – 1835 Deermont Rd
373 of 446
Photo 19 – 1841 Deermont Rd
374 of 446
Photo 20 – 1845 Deermont Rd
375 of 446
Photo 21 – 1849 Deermont Rd
376 of 446
Photo 22 – 1914 Rimcrest Dr
377 of 446
Photo 23 – 1681 Larco Way
378 of 446
Photo 24 – 1682 Larco Way
379 of 446
lRACT NO. 31369
.
.. ,.
\ '='-
,.
i.
j• i
:

I
I
tt i 3?
�· S?
1/, ,,.� .. �
PM.1054
PM.8. 27-89 -90
PM.1054
LOCATION MAP: APN: 5648-024-013, GLENDALE, CA 91202. 500' RADIUS, SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: 01-26-2023
POROFW1/2SEC 16
V. BEAUDRY'$ Mrs
M.R36-67-71
'
/,,_-:. ______ ��:.-::.._.' '",< , ·,c,,., 2.5c
�' :,·5
!�
�·

12.08 / :r • \ \;,�-��.�;-
,, �� \ � ·
380 of 446
Proposed Materials for 1650 Hazbeth Lane – V2
STONE VENEER – CULTURED STONE, “LAKE TAHOE”
ROOFING STANDING SEAM METAL COLOR
SIDING FIBERCON CLADDING TRIM HARDITRIM 4/4 RUSTIC DOOR & WINDOW CONCORDIA HORIZON, COLOR – IPE TIMBER BARK
STUCCO – SERENGETI SAND RAILING FEENEY STAINLESS STEEL CABLE RAIL SYSTEM IN IPE COLOR WOOD FRAME 381 of 446
Tram Car
382 of 446

INCLINE CAR SYSTEMS
Allenton, Wisconsin
11/16/2007
Uphill End with Governor
383 of 446
384 of 446
1300 Capistrano Ave, Glendale, CA 91208 (Verdugo Woodlands) 385 of 446
1300 Capistrano Ave, Glendale, CA 91208 (Verdugo Woodlands) 386 of 446
3385 Ley Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90027 (Los Feliz area)

387 of 446
View from start of Hazbeth private driveway:

View from front of Kirch home at 1656 Hazbeth Lane:
388 of 446
From: Pamela Sellers
To: Joe, Dennis
Subject: Design Review Case No. 2201810--1650 Hazbeth Lane, hearing date: February 9 Date: Thursday, January 26, 2023 11:28:45 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mr. Joe,
I am looking for information about the poles which were put up yesterday on the above-cited property. I live on the portion of Glenmont Dr. which is directly above those poles, but have received no notice of any proposed project. I learned of the case number and hearing date from a neighbor who lives on Hazbeth.

My street will be greatly affected by any construction as would be clear to anyone who visits the site. If you have access to prior applications for building on this property you will see the potential problems and the danger to my street.

Please let me know if you are planning to notify me and my neighbors, how we get access to the application file, and what we can do to provide our input.

Thank you.

Pamela Sellers
1592 Glenmont Dr.

Glendale 91207
Tel. 818-553-6771 Home
818-296-5771 Cell
389 of 446
2/23/22, 4:21 PM Plan Check 4565

CITY OF GLENDALE

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
DATE:

TO:

February 07, 2022
Dennis C. Joe, Community Development Department
FROM: Gerald Tom, GWP Water Engineering
Daniel Scorza, GWP Electric Engineering
SUBJECT: APN 5648-024-013
1650 Hazbeth Ln
Glendale Water & Power (GWP) Engineering has reviewed the plans.

Requirements are as follows:

Electric Engineering
Customer Service (818) 548-3921
Project to contact GWP Customer Service Engineering to determine electric service requirements before starting the permitting process. Final construction plans must incorporate the electric service plan information for GWP Electric Engineering to sign off the building plan application.

Project to provide electric service - size, single line diagram and electric load calculation per National Electric Code (NEC).

Project to convey an easement to GWP for installation of overhead or underground lines, conduits, poles and any other appurtenances for the distribution of electric power through property as required by GWP. Contact GWP Customer Service Engineering to obtain an application for easement and pay applicable fee. This fee shall be paid to GWP Electric Engineering.

Project will require an on-site transformer vault facility for the electrical service. GWP will start the new vault design after the project has provided the following:

Electrical load calculations.

Single line diagram.

Electrical room layout.

Switchboard elevations.

Architectural plans showing the proposed vault and electrical room locations.

Elevation plans.

Additional comment(s) and/or attachment(s).

Project must provide space at same grade as garage for an on-site transformer facility with enough access for GWP to offload a transformer with a crane. Project should contact GWP early in design phase to determine the location for the on-site transformer facility and electrical meter panel, as this could have a big impact on the project design.

Fiber Optics (818) 548-3923
No conflict.

Street Lighting (818) 548-4877
No Conflict
Transmission & Distribution (818) 548-3923
No conflict.
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4565&space=1 1/3 390 of 446
2/23/22, 4:21 PM Plan Check 4565
Water Engineering
Recycled Water (818) 548-2062
No conflict.

Backflow Prevention (818) 548-2062
No conflict.

Potable Water (818) 548-2062
Developer is responsible for the current cost of a water service or fire line installation in accordance with the current water fee schedule.

Any water service or fire line connection, when no longer needed by the customer, must be permanently abandoned (disconnected at water main and water meter removed) by GWP following payment of the necessary fee.

Any water service or fire line shall have a separate connection to the potable water main. A single connection that combines domestic and fire protection uses is not allowed.

Fire Department approval/exemption shall be obtained when determining if existing fire flow is adequate. The applicant shall pay the cost of any necessary fire or domestic water services and recycled water service to the property, as well as offsite water facility improvements necessary to provide fire flow as required by the Glendale Fire Department.

All water facilities shall be protected in place during construction of the subject project. All water valves, water meter boxes, water vaults and fire hydrants must be relocated and set to finished grade when necessary at project's expense.

No water service is available to this property; a water main extension is required to obtain service for this property. Where a water main extension is required to provide water service, extension shall be across the frontage of served property. Per Glendale Municipal Code (Chapter 13.20.060).

A complete set of plans shall be submitted for review to GWP Water Engineering.

All proposed utilities parallel with water mains shall have a minimum 4-feet of lateral clearance if the proposed utilities are installed at the same depth as the existing water main. If the proposed utilities have a minimum 1- foot vertical clearance from the existing water main, then the lateral clearance between the proposed utilities and the existing water main shall be 2-feet.

All proposed utilities crossing water mains shall maintain a minimum 1-foot vertical clearance from the water main. Please plan accordingly in order to maintain the clearance between the proposed utilities and the existing water mains.

Additional comment(s) and/or attachment(s).

DEVELOPER SHALL PAY FOR THE MAIN EXTENSION AND NEW FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION, HIRE A

LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO DESIGN THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION,

HIRE A CONTRACTOR FROM GLENDALE WATER AND POWER'S APPROVED CONTRACTOR LIST FOR

CONSTRUCTION OF THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION AND DEVELOPER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT TO THE

CITY FOR THE COST OF PLAN REVIEW, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, RECORD KEEPING AND FIELD SUPPORT FOR THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION.

Daniel Scorza Gerald Tom
Chief Assistant General Manager Senior Civil Engineer
DS/GT:fg/sb
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4565&space=1 2/3 391 of 446
2/23/22, 4:21 PM Plan Check 4565
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4565&space=1 3/3 392 of 446
2/24/22, 9:59 AM Plan Check 4565

CITY OF GLENDALE

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
DATE:

TO:

Requirements are as follows:

Project to provide electric service - size, single line diagram and electric load calculation per National Electric Code (NEC).

Project will require an on-site transformer vault facility for the electrical service. GWP will start the new vault design after the project has provided the following:

Electrical load calculations.

Single line diagram.

Electrical room layout.

Switchboard elevations.

Architectural plans showing the proposed vault and electrical room locations.

Elevation plans.

Additional comment(s) and/or attachment(s).

Fiber Optics (818) 548-3923
No conflict.

Street Lighting (818) 548-4877
No Conflict
Transmission & Distribution (818) 548-3923
No conflict.
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4565&space=1 1/3 393 of 446
2/24/22, 9:59 AM Plan Check 4565
Water Engineering
Recycled Water (818) 548-2062
No conflict.

Backflow Prevention (818) 548-2062
No conflict.

Potable Water (818) 548-2062
Developer is responsible for the current cost of a water service or fire line installation in accordance with the current water fee schedule.

Any water service or fire line shall have a separate connection to the potable water main. A single connection that combines domestic and fire protection uses is not allowed.

A complete set of plans shall be submitted for review to GWP Water Engineering.

Additional comment(s) and/or attachment(s).

DEVELOPER SHALL PAY FOR THE MAIN EXTENSION AND NEW FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION, HIRE A

LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO DESIGN THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION,

HIRE A CONTRACTOR FROM GLENDALE WATER AND POWER'S APPROVED CONTRACTOR LIST FOR

CONSTRUCTION OF THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION AND DEVELOPER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT TO THE

CITY FOR THE COST OF PLAN REVIEW, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, RECORD KEEPING AND FIELD SUPPORT FOR THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION. DEVELOPER/OWNER SHALL PROVIDE A 20-FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TO THE CITY RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY FOR THE WATER AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES. THE ALIGNMENT OF THE EASEMENT SHALL BE

DETERMINED AFTER DESIGN FOR BOTH WATER AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY GWP.

Daniel Scorza Gerald Tom
Chief Assistant General Manager Senior Civil Engineer
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4565&space=1 2/3 394 of 446
2/24/22, 9:59 AM Plan Check 4565
DS/GT:fg/sb
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4565&space=1 3/3 395 of 446

CITY OF GLENDALE

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
Community Development Department
Request for Comments Form (RFC)
DATE: DUE DATE:

NOTE: If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

FROM: Dennis Joe, Senior Planner Tel. # 1/24/2022
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1650 Hazbeth Lane (APN 5648-024-013)
Applicant: Sam Talebian
Property Owner: Adel Luzuriaga
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

To construct a new 3,239 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence and a detached 1,077 square-foot, three-car garage on a vacant 295,337 square-foot (6.78 acre) parcel, zoned R1R II (Restricted Residential, floor area district II). The project includes the construction of a private funicular (tramway) between the single-family dwelling and detached garage, a 288 square-foot portico and 1,987.75 cubic yards of cut/1,913.82 cubic yards of fill.

PLEASE CHECK:

G. INFORMATION SERVICES
A. CITY ATTORNEY (Wireless Telecom)
B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: H. PUBLIC WORKS (ADMINISTRATION):
• (1) Building & Safety X
X
• (1) Engineering & Land
X Development
X
X
•
•
•
•
•
(2) Neighborhood Services
(3) Design Review & Historic
(4) Economic Development
(5) Housing
•
•
•
•
(2) Traffic & Transportation
(3) Facilities (city projects only)
(4) Integrated Waste
(5) Maintenance Services/Urban
X Forester
X
X
(6) Urban Design & Mobility
J. GLENDALE POLICE D. COMMUNITY SERVICES/PARKS:

E. FIRE ENGINEERING (PSC) K. OTHER:
• (1) STATE-Alcohol Beverage
F. GLENDALE WATER & POWER: Control (ABC)
X
X
•
•
(1) Water •
•
(2) Tribal Consultations (EIFs)
(2) Electric (3) City Clerk’s Office

ENTITLEMENT(S) REQUESTED
Variance Case No.:

AUP/CUP Case No.:

ADR/DRB Case No.:

Tentative Tract/Parcel Map No.:

Zone Change/GPA:

Other
Revised 7 DECEMBER 2021 --VE 1
396 of 446

INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION

PROJECT CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS
Project
Address: 1650 Hazbeth Lane (APN 5648-024-013)
Project
Case No.:

If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

NOTE: Your comments should address, within your area of authority, concerns and potentially significant adverse physical changes to the environment regarding the project. You may also identify code requirements specific to the project, above and beyond your normal requirements. Applicant will be informed early in the development process.

You may review complete plans, maps and exhibits in our office, MSB Room 103. We appreciate your consideration and look forward to your timely comments. Please do not recommend APPROVAL or DENIAL. For any questions, please contact the Case Planner ASAP, so as not to delay the case processing.

COMMENTS:


This office DOES NOT have any comment.

This office HAS the following comments/conditions.  (See attached Dept. Master List) Date:02-24-2022
Print Name: Sarkis Hairapetian
Title: Pr. BCS. Dept. B&S. Tel.: X-3209
Conditions:
 1. That all necessary permits (i.e., building, fire, engineering, grading, etc.) shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction shall be in compliance with the Glendale Building Code and all other applicable regulations.

A. Separate application is required for separate detached structures, demolition, retaining walls, fences and swimming pool.

B. Projects is within the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Areas and it shall comply with Chapter 7A, Vol. 1. CBC 2019.
 2. That the premises shall be made available and accessible to any authorized City personnel (Building, Fire, Police, Neighborhood Services, Planning, etc.), for inspection to ascertain that all conditions of approval of this conditional use permit are complied with.
 3. That Structure or building on hillside with slope greater than 33% shall comply with the Section 1615 special hillside design requirements.
 4. That additional or other building code requirements or specific code requirements (i.e.

CA Green Building Code, etc.) will be required upon submittal of plans for building plan check and permit.

A. Electric vehicle (EV) charging for new construction. New construction shall Comply with Glendale’s CALGreen Sections 4.106.4.1 (items #5 ) to facilitate the future installation and use of electric vehicle (EV) chargers. Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) when installed, shall be in accordance with the California Electrical Code (CEC).
 5. A grading permit is required. Refer to Grading Requirements Checklist for additional requirements.
 6. LID for Single Family Hillside Homes: Implement measures per Glendale Municipal Code Section 13.43.030-D.
 7. The proposed improvements shall not increase the amount of storm water runoff to the properties downstream. Hydrology and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.
 8. Any proposed drainage infrastructures shall be constructed per City standards.

Revised 7 DECEMBER 2021 --VE 2
397 of 446
 9. Additional requirements may apply after the initial submittal of the plans for building plan check.

Revised 7 DECEMBER 2021 --VE 3
398 of 446
399 of 446
400 of 446
401 of 446
402 of 446
403 of 446
404 of 446
405 of 446

CITY OF GLENDALE

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
Community Development Department
Request for Comments Form (RFC)
DATE: DUE DATE:

NOTE: If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

FROM: Dennis Joe, Senior Planner Tel. # 1/24/2022
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1650 Hazbeth Lane (APN 5648-024-013)
Applicant: Sam Talebian
Property Owner: Adel Luzuriaga
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

PLEASE CHECK:

ENTITLEMENT(S) REQUESTED
Variance Case No.:

AUP/CUP Case No.:

ADR/DRB Case No.:

Tentative Tract/Parcel Map No.:

Zone Change/GPA:

Other
Revised 7 DECEMBER 2021 --VE 1
406 of 446

INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION

PROJECT CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS
Project
Address: 1650 Hazbeth Lane (APN 5648-024-013)
Project
Case No.:

If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

Glendale City CouncilJuly 11, 2023

Glendale City Council
July 11, 2023