in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
201 of 642
similar portable spreadsheet format;
6. If the claimed significant gap affects a commercial district, show the boundaries of the district on the map
7. If the claimed significant gap poses a public safety risk, describe in detail the claimed risk, and the expansively discuss the basis for this claim. i. If the claimed significant gap is based in whole or in part on factors regarding any factor related to switching center capacity; dropped calls; failed hand-offs; interference from or to other cell sites; pilot channels; site hopping; degraded RXQUAL; degraded Ec/Io; and/or any failure to meet any carrier transmission goal or percentage goal, attach at least the most recent twelve months of historical data by month documenting at least (1) the results or numerical data of each claimed parameter; (2) the wireless carrier’s numerical and percentage requirements for each such claimed perimeter; (3) the total number of calls attempted for each month both successfully and unsuccessfully completed; (4) the total number of calls that were not completed including failed originations; failed hand-offs; and non-normal call terminations; and (5) for every such claimed parameter that is not categorized by way of number or percentage, provide the data in the way kept by the carrier.
j. Provide all other relevant information you want the City of Glendale to consider when evaluating your claim of a significant gap.
Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.12.” Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.12 is attached hereto.
4.13 Is the proposed project the least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12? ___ Yes ___ No
4.14 If the answer to 4.13 is NO proceed to 4.20.
4.15 Attach a written statement fully and expansively describing at a minimum:
a. Why this project is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12.
b. Identify and discuss all alternative sites and means considered to close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12.
c. Whether two or more sites in lieu of the site proposed in Section 1 could close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12, or to reduce the significant gap to be less than significant, with less impact on the community as compared with a single site? If the answer is no, please explain in narrative format the basis for that answer.
d. Whether the City of Glendale requiring two or more sites in place of the site proposed in Section 1 would prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the applicant from providing any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.
City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
202 of 642
If the response asserts that a prohibition or effective prohibition would occur, explain in detail in narrative form all of the reasons why it would e. Include and attach all information whatsoever you relied on in reaching your affirmative determination in 4.13.
f. Include any other information you believe would assist the City of Glendale make findings regarding whether the proposed project is the least intrusive means of closing the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12, or to reduce the significant gap to be less than significant.
Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.15.”
Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.15 is attached hereto. Proceed to 4.20
4.20 If any portion of the project is to utilize radio spectrum that does not require an FCC license, identify in detail the portions of the project that used unlicensed spectrum.
Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.20.”
Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.20 is attached hereto.
4.25 Is this project designed to use any form of direct site-to-site radio interconnection (i.e., microwave or donor/donee configuration, for example) with another existing or currently planned site? _ Yes ✔ No
4.26: If the answer to 4.25 is NO proceed to 5.00.
4.27: Attach a detailed written statement fully and expansively describing the radio interconnection proposed, and identify all other existing or planned sites that will be interconnected with this project. Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.25.” Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.25 is attached hereto.
5.00: Build-Out Requirements
5.01: Do any of radio services identified in 3.09 above require the licensee to provide specific radio frequency/population build-out coverage pursuant to the underlying FCC license? _✔ Yes No
5.02: If the answer to 5.01 is NO proceed to 6.00.
5.03: Have all of the FCC build-out requirements as required by all licenses covering all radio services proposed at this Project been met? Yes _✔ No
5.04: If the answer to 5.03 is YES proceed to 6.00.
City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
203 of 642
5.05: Disclose by licensee call sign identified in Section 3.02 all build-out requirements/obligations which have yet to be met, and the known or estimated date when the remaining build-out requirements will be met. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 5.05.”
Initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that Exhibit 5.05 is attached hereto.
5.10 Will this proposed site be interconnected via radio frequency transmissions to any other site or sites now constructed, proposed, or anticipated? For the purpose of this question, interconnection includes one or more radio frequency links to provide for ‘back-haul’ from this site to a switching center or centralized node location. ___ Yes _X__ No
5.11: If the answer to 5.10 is NO proceed to 6.00.
5.15 Identify by physical address (or if none, by geographic description) all other sites, regardless of whether now constructed, proposed, or anticipated, that are to be interconnected with this project site. Disclose in technical detail the proposed method of interconnection. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 5.15.” Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 5.15 is attached hereto.
6.00: Radio Frequency Coverage Maps
6.01: Where a licensee intends to provide radio frequency coverage from the project to an identified geographic coverage, the coverage maps and information requested in Section 6 are required Exhibits.
Distributed Antenna System (DAS) providers and all others who are not the RF emitters for the radio services proposed for this project and identified in 3.09: You must provide radio frequency coverage maps prepared by the FCC licensee(s) that will control the RF emissions from this project. Radio frequency coverage maps required here that are completed by a DAS provider are unacceptable if they are not the FCC licensee or in full control of the RF emitter for the particular wireless service transmitted through the project.
If no geographic coverage area is identified, initial here _______ and proceed to 7.00.
6.02 For the coverage maps required here, the following mandatory requirements apply.
Failure to adhere to these requirements may delay your application’s determination of completeness.
a. The size of each submitted map must be no smaller than 11” by 8.5.” Each map must be of the same physical size and map area scale. Each map must use the same base map (i.e., same streets and legends shown on all).
City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
204 of 642
b. If the FCC rules for any proposed radio service defines a minimum radio frequency signal level that level must be shown on the map in a color easily distinguishable from the base paper or transparency layer, and adequately identified by RF level and map color or gradient in the map legend. If no minimum signal level is defined by the FCC rules you must indicate that in the legend of each RF coverage map. You may show other RF signal level(s) on the map so long as they are adequately identified by objective RF level and map color or gradient in the map legend.
6.03: Provide a map consistent with the requirements of 6.02 showing the existing RF coverage within the City of Glendale on the Applicant’s same network, if any (if no existing coverage, so state). This map should not depict any RF coverage to be provided by the Project. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 6.03.” Initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that Exhibit 6.03 is attached hereto.
6.04: Provide a map consistent with the requirements of 6.02 showing the RF coverage to be provided only by the Project. This map should not depict any RF coverage provided any other existing or proposed wireless sites. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 6.04.”
Initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that Exhibit 6.04 is attached hereto.
6.05: Provide a map consistent with the requirements of 6.02 showing the RF coverage to be provided by the Project and by all other existing wireless sites on the same network should the Project site be activated. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 6.05.” Initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that Exhibit 6.05 is attached hereto.
7.00: Project Photographs and Photo Simulations
7.01: The Applicant shall submit photo simulations consistent with the following standards:
1. Minimum size of each base photo and each photo simulation must be 10 inches by 8 inches (landscape orientation). Each base photo and matching photo simulation must be the same size. Single sheets of 11 x 8 ½ inches showing base photos and photo simulations on the same page are unacceptable.
2. All elements of the Project as proposed by the Applicant which can be seen from any point at ground level, or from any level within or on buildings within 500 feet of the Project must be shown in one or more close-in photo simulations (i.e., panel antennas, omni-directional antennas, GPS antennas, antenna camouflage devices, cable trays; equipment cabinets; working lights; etc.).
3. The overall Project as proposed by the Applicant must be shown in three or more area City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
205 of 642
photo simulations. Base photographs must, at a minimum, be taken from widely scattered positions of 120 degrees. A map detail showing each location where a photograph was taken, the proposed site, and the direction to the site from each photo location must be included. Base photographs taken from locations that have some physical feature obscuring the Project site, and the photo simulations associated with those same base photographs, are not acceptable.
Attach all base photographs and photo simulations to this application marked as Exhibit
7.01. The purpose of the photo simulations is to allow the City of Glendale to visualize the Project as completed, therefore the number of site photos, and photo simulations, and the actual or simulated camera location of these photos and photo simulations are subject to City of Glendale determination. The Applicant should submit photos and photo simulations consistent with these instructions, and be prepared to provide additional photos and photo simulations should they be requested by the City of Glendale.
The Applicant certifies by initialing in the space at the end of this paragraph that that all of the photos and photo simulations provided for Exhibit 7.01 are accurate and reliable photographic representations of the current project site and the proposed project to be constructed or modified, and that the Applicant is fully aware that the City of Glendale will rely on all of the photos and photo simulations provided in Exhibit 7.01 when it considers approval of this Project, and later when determining project completion.
Applicant’s initials: _A_N_________ (If not initialed, this application may be deemed incomplete by the City of Glendale.)
8.00: Alternative Candidate Sites
8.01: Amateur radio applicants proceed to 9.00.
8.02: Has the Applicant or Owner or anyone working on behalf of the Applicant or Owner secured or attempted to secure any leases or lease-options or similar formal or informal agreements in connection with this Project for any sites other than the proposed project site? _X__ Yes ___ No
8.03: If the answer to 8.02 is NO proceed to 8.05.
8.04: Provide the physical address of each such other location, and provide an expansive technical explanation as to why each such other site was disfavored over the Project Site.
Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 8.04.”
Initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that Exhibit 8.04 is attached hereto.
8.05: Considering this proposed site, is it the one and only one location within or outside of the City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
206 of 642
City of Glendale that can possibly meet the objectives of the Project? ___ Yes _X__ No
8.04: If the answer to 8.05 is NO, proceed to 9.00.
8.05: Provide a technically expansive and detailed explanation supported as required by comprehensive radio frequency data and all other necessary information fully describing why the proposed site is the one is it the one and only one location within or outside of the City of Glendale that can possibly meet the radio frequency objectives of the Project.
Explain, in exact and expansive technical detail all of the objectives of this Project that can be achieved only at this project site, and why.
Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 8.05.”
Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 8.05 is attached hereto.
9.00: Identification of Key Persons
9.01: Identify by name, title, company affiliation, work address, telephone number and extension, and email address the key person or persons most knowledgeable regarding this Project so that the City of Glendale may contact them with questions regarding the Project:
9.10 9.20
9.30 Person responsible for the final site selection for the Project; Name: Joe Milone
Title:
Company Affiliation:
Work Address:
Executive Director
ExteNet Systems
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
Telephone / Ext.:
Email Address:
(281) 203-6100
[email protected]
Person responsible for the radio frequency engineering of the Project; Name: Dimitri Gogas
Title:
Company Affiliation:
Work Address:
RF
ExteNet Systems
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
Telephone / Ext.:
Email Address: 415-617-5190
[email protected]
Person responsible for rejection of other candidate sites evaluated, if any; Name: Joe Milone
Title:
Company Affiliation:
Work Address:
Executive Director
ExteNet Systems
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
Telephone / Ext.:
Email Address: (281) 203-6100
[email protected]
City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
207 of 642
9.40 If more than one key person is now or was involved in any of the functions identified in this section at or before the time of the submission of this form, attach a separate sheet providing the same information for each additional person, and identifying which function or functions are/were performed by each additional person.
Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 9.40.”
Initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that the information above is complete and there is no Exhibit 9.4, or initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 9.40 is attached.
10.00 Additional Information Provided by Applicant
10.01 You are invited and encouraged to provide any additional written information that you wish the City of Glendale to consider in connection with your proposed project.
If you wish to attach information, designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 10.” Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 10 is attached hereto, or initial here _A_N_____ to indicate that there is no Exhibit 10 attached.
11.00: Certification of Accuracy and Reliability
11.01: The undersigned certifies on behalf of itself, the Applicant, and the Owner that the information provided in this form and its contents are true and complete to the best of the undersigned’s ability and knowledge, and that information provided here should be relied upon by the City of Glendale as being accurate and complete when the City of Glendale evaluates this project.
_______________________________
Signature
________________________
ExteNet Systems, LLC Authorized Agent
Title
_A_l e_x_a_nd_e_r_N_o_v_ak____________________ _a_l e_x_an_d_e_r._n_o_va_k_@_p_a_r_tn_e_r._te_le_w_o_rl_dsolutions Print Name Provide Email Address
_T_e_le_w_o_rl_d_S_o_lu_tion_ _s__________________ _6_82 - _ _3_5_1-_3_3_35_______________ Print Company Name Provide Telephone Number
_2_/2_1_/2_0_2_3________________________
Date Signed
<Last Page: Remember to sign above and initial below>
City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: _A_N_________
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010
208 of 642
209 of 642
210 of 642
211 of 642
212 of 642
213 of 642
214 of 642
FCC/LSGAC Local Official’s Guide to RF
Optional Checklist for Local Government
To Determine Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded Purpose: The FCC has determined that many wireless facilities are unlikely to cause human exposures in excess of RF exposure guidelines. Operators of those facilities are exempt from routinely having to determine their compliance. These facilities are termed "categorically excluded." Section 1.1307(b)(1) of the Commission's rules defines those categorically excluded facilities. This checklist will assist state and local government agencies in identifying those wireless facilities that are categorically excluded, and thus are highly unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. Provision of the information identified on this checklist may also assist FCC staff in evaluating any inquiry regarding a facility’s compliance with the RF exposure guidelines.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Facility Operator’s LegalName: ExteNet Systems, Inc.
Facility Operator’s Mailing Address: 300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502 Facility Operator’s Contact Name/Title: Drew Yoon
Facility Operator’s OfficeTelephone: 949-232-2359
Facility Operator’s Fax:
Facility Name: SCL Glendale 237
Facility Address: FRONT OF 1544 W KENNETH RD
FacilityCity/Community: Glendale
Facility State and Zip Code: CA 91201
Latitude: 34° 10' 26.48" N
Longitude: 118° 16' 57.06" W
continue 215 of 642
Optional Local Government Checklist (page 2)
EVALUATION OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
12. Licensed Radio Service (see attached Table 1):Personal Communications Service
13. Structure Type (free-standing orbuilding/roof-mounted): Free Standing
14. Antenna Type [omnidirectional or directional (includes sectored)]: Directional
15. Height above ground of the lowest point of the antenna (in meters): 7.85 m
16. Check if all of the following are true:
(a) This facility will be operated in the Multipoint Distribution Service, Paging and Radiotelephone Service, Cellular Radiotelephone Service, Narrowband or Broadband Personal Communications Service, Private Land Mobile Radio Services Paging Operations, Private Land Mobile Radio Service Specialized Mobile Radio, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, or service regulated under Part 74, Subpart I (see question 12).
(b) This facility will not be mounted on a building (see question 13). (c) The lowest point of the antenna will be at least 10 meters above the ground (see question 15).
If box 16 is checked, this facility is categorically excluded and is unlikely to cause exposurein excess of the FCC’s guidelines. The remainder of the checklist need not be completed. If box 16 is not checked, continue to question 17.
17. Enter the power threshold for categorical exclusion for this service from the attached Table 1 in watts ERP or EIRP∗ (note: EIRP = (1.64) X ERP): Please see attached calculations
18. Enter the total number of channels if this will be an omnidirectional antenna, or the maximum number of channels in any sector if this will be a sectored antenna:
19. Enter the ERP or EIRP per channel (using the same units as in question 17):
20. Multiply answer 18 by answer19:
21. Is the answer to question 20 less than or equal to the value from question 17 (yes) If the answer to question 21 is YES, this facility is categorically excluded. It is unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines.
If the answer to question 21 is NO, this facility is not categorically excluded. Further investigation may be appropriate to verify whether the facility may cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines.
∗"ERP" means "effective radiated power" and "EIRP" means "effective isotropic radiated power 216 of 642
1054 Texan Trail, Suite 300 • Grapevine, Texas 76051
Tel: 682-651-0034 • Fax: 817-527-4081
[email protected] • www.gssmidwest.com
MPE Compliance Checklist
This form shall be filled out by the RF Engineer after construction drawings are finalized and prior to completion of the NEPA report. A new checklist must be prepared for any new or modified facility including height, power/ERP, antenna changes, channel adds, or frequency additions.
Site Number: SW-CA-GLENDA-00237
Date: 2/21/2023
Site Name: SCL GLENDALE 237
RFEngineer: Prasad Kuppurangan
RF Engineer Signature: ___ ____________________
1. Are the following statements TRUE?
a. This facility will be operated between 300 kHz and 100 GHz [including 600 MHz, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 1900 MHz, 2100 MHz, CBRS (3 GHz), LAA (5 GHz), mmWave (24 GHz, 28 GHz, 39 GHz) frequency bands].
b. This facility will not be mounted on a building.
X YES
X YES
NO
NO
c. This facility employs frequency bands between 300 kHz and 100 GHz [including 600 MHz, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 1900 MHz, 2100 MHz, CBRS (3 GHz), LAA (5 GHz), mmWave (24 GHz, 28 GHz, 39 GHz) frequency bands], is the total power of all RF sources ≤1 as per the following formula.
Figure 1: Multiple RF Source Summation Equation X YES NO ERPj = the available maximum time-averaged power or the ERP, whichever is greater, of fixed, mobile, or portable RF source j.
ERPth,j = exemption threshold ERP for fixed, mobile, or portable RF source j, at a distance of at least λ/2π, according to the applicable MPE-based Single RF Source formula at the location in question.
Note: EIRP = (1.64 X ERP)
* If Steps 1.a, b and c are “Yes”, then the tower is deemed ‘exempt’ from the requirement to perform routine environmental processing for RF exposure. Therefore, Conduct Step 5, provide a copy of the following Compliance Statement to the Project Manager or vendor completing the NEPA report.
GSS || Page 1 of 2
217 of 642
*If you checked NO to any of the three statements, this facility is not ‘exempt’. Further investigation is appropriate to verify whether the facility may cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. Continue to question 2.
2. NOTE on Building-Mounts: GSS recommends full MPE evaluation assessment on all rooftops, water tanks and other building mounted antennas - no exemptions apply. (Conduct the full MPE evaluation study then proceed to Step 3 regardless of response)
3. Are the RF Exposure limits in excess of FCC regulations (47 CFR 1.1310 and 2.1093)? (If “No”, skip question 4)
YES NO
4. Will the RF power densities exceed occupational or public exposure limits under the RF Exposure Study if all recommended RF mitigation procedures are implemented? YES NO (If “Yes”, contact RF Planning and Regulatory Affairs for additional mitigation measures before proceeding)
5. Final Action: Attach the MPE Analysis and forward this form along with any additional MPE documentation to the Project Manager.
Statement of Compliance with FCC Rules 47 CFR Sec. 1.1307 & Sec. 1.1310 The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulates the maximum permissible exposure (“MPE”) of persons to RF radiation and wireless carriers must comply with the requirements of the FCC. The relevant requirements which deal with wireless antenna towers and other structures are found in Sections 1.1307 and 1.1310 of the FCC’s RF Exposure Rules.
Appendix
GSS ||Page 2 of 2
218 of 642
ALJ/CFG/avs/lil Date of Issuance 9/30/2019
Decision 19-09-045 September 26, 2019
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of ExteNet Systems, Inc., for a
Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity to Provide Full Facilities-Based
and Resold Competitive Local Exchange
and Interexchange Services.
Application 18-11-002
DECISION GRANTING EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FULL FACILITIES-BASED AND RESOLD
COMPETITIVE LOCAL EXCHANGE AND INTEREXCHANGE SERVICE
Summary
Pursuant to Public Utilities Code § 1001, we grant ExteNet Services, Inc., a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive local exchange and interexchange service in California subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Ordering Paragraphs.
This proceeding is closed.
1. Background
On November 1, 2018, ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI), a corporation authorized to do business in California, filed an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to provide full facilities-based and resold Local Exchange and Interexchange competitive services in the service territories of Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California (AT&T 314298574 - 1 -
219 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
California), Frontier California Inc. (Frontier California),1 Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. d/b/a Frontier Communications of California (Frontier Communications), and Consolidated Communications of California Company (Consolidated Communications, formerly SureWest Telephone)2 and interexchange service in California.
ESI is a privately held Delaware corporation which has operating permits in most states throughout the United States.3 ESI’s principal place of business is in Lisle, Illinois. The ultimate parent of ESI is Mount Royal Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which is owned by multiple private equity firms and individuals in the management of ESI, none of which own a majority share.4
ESI itself is the sole owner of six subsidiaries, each one authorized to provide intrastate telecommunications services in at least one state.5 Among these six subsidiaries is one holding a certificate authorizing it to conduct business as a telephone corporation in California; that entity is known as ExteNet Systems (California) LLC (U6959C) (hereinafter, ESI-CA).
Originally, in 2005, ESI-CA’s certificate and utility designation number (U6959C) were issued to its parent, ESI. ESI-CA did not exist at the time. In two decisions, one (D.05-07-004) issued shortly after ESI was initially authorized 1 Frontier California was formerly Verizon California, Inc. (Verizon). As of April 1, 2016, Verizon’s operations in California were acquired and are now operated by Frontier California, Inc., pursuant to Decision (D.) 15-12-005.
2 SureWest Telephone was acquired by Consolidated Communications Inc. in 2012, pursuant to D.12-06-004, and SureWest Telephone changed its name to Consolidated Communications of California Company as of January 1, 2016.
3 See Application at 2. ESI represents in its application that it holds authorizations to provide telecommunications services in 43 states, plus the District of Columbia. 4 Ibid.
5 Application at 2.
- 2 -
220 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
to operate as a telephone corporation in California and the other (D.06-04-063) a year later, the Commission increased ESI’s operating authority to allow ESI to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive local exchange and non-dominant interexchange services.
In November 2006, ESI organized ESI-CA as its wholly owned subsidiary.6 In April 2007, the Commission granted ESI permission to transfer its CPCN to ESI-CA.7
ESI explains in its current application that it desires a CPCN of its own, again, which it will use to provide the same services in California as ESI-CA, even while ESI-CA continues to operate in California.8 Documents, sent by ESI to the Communications Division of the Commission, indicate that ESI’s purpose for seeking another CPCN while ESI-CA continues to hold the original CPCN is “to align the [ESI-CA and ESI] companies with their current and future customer focus … and to obtain debt financing.”9
ESI represents that it and ESI-CA will pursue two new debt financing transactions, each to a separate lender. According to ESI, its subsidiary, ESI-CA, will pledge some of its California assets to secure financing from one source and other of its California assets to secure financing from a different source; however, ESI will provide the services associated with some of the pledged assets while 6 Advice Letter No. 4, dated April 3, 2007, at 2.
7 On April 24, 2007 the Commission approved the transfer requested in Advice Letter No. 4. 8 Application at 7 (“… Applicant will offer similar services at the same rates and on the same conditions as currently provided by [ESI-CA] …”); see also, ESI’s Response to ALJ Request for Additional Information, filed May 29, 2019, at 2 (“ESI and ESI CA will provide identical services in California following issuance of a CPCN to ESI”).
9 Advice Letter No. 141, dated June 7, 2019, at 3. This advice letter sought permission to transfer control of ESI-CA to a newly created, indirect subsidiary of ESI, called ExteNet Issuer, LLC. The Commission granted permission for the change of control on June 10, 2019. - 3 -
221 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
ESI-CA continues to provide services associated with the remainder of the newly pledged assets.10
ESI provides services to the following types of business customers:
wireless carriers, broadband providers, commercial property owners, enterprises, communities and Internet of Things (IoT) companies. It has a comparatively small number of core customers which provide significant, aggregate, annual, consolidated revenue. If its application for a CPCN is granted, ESI intends to provide infrastructure facilities, such as dark fiber and metro cell nodes, to transport and transmit communications from wireless and wireline carriers in California. ESI states that it expects that any outside plant construction will be small scale, such as short conduit routes, installation of poles or conduit where existing facilities are inadequate and small, above-ground facilities in roadways and other previously developed rights of way.11 ESI filed its application on November 1, 2018. On November 29, 2018 the Commission determined the proceeding should be characterized as ratesetting and a hearing would be necessary. The proceeding was assigned to Commissioner Liane Randolph and Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Charles Ferguson.
A prehearing conference was held before the assigned ALJ on April 22, 2019 at which only ESI appeared. On May 29, 2019 ESI supplemented its application by submitting further confidential financial information requested by the assigned ALJ at the April 22 prehearing conference. 10 See ESI’s Response to ALJ Request for Additional Information, filed May 29, 2019, at 2 (“Certain assets currently held in California by ESI CA will be pledged to one financing party and other assets currently held by ESI CA will be pledged to a separate financing party[;] … both ESI and ESI CA will need CPCNs in order to allow them to provide the services associated with those pledged assets”).
11 See Application, Exh. D.
- 4 -
222 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
A scoping memo was issued by the assigned Commissioner on August 12, 2019.
2. Jurisdiction
Public Utilities Code (Pub. Util. Code) § 216(a) defines the term “public utility” to include a “telephone corporation,” which in turn is defined in Pub.
Util. Code § 234(a) as “every corporation or person owning, controlling, operating, or managing any telephone line for compensation within this state.” ESI proposes to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive services throughout California.
ESI is a Common Carrier as defined by § 153 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act) eligible to interconnect with the public switched telephone network pursuant to §§ 251 and 252 of the Act, and that if granted a CPCN, it will operate as a telephone corporation under Pub. Util. Code § 234(a), and obey the Public Utility Code and all Commission rules, decisions, and orders applicable to telephone corporations.
3. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Pursuant to CEQA and Rule 2.412 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission examines projects to determine any potential environmental impacts in order that adverse effects are avoided, and environmental quality is fully restored or enhanced as much as possible under CEQA.
As noted above, ESI’s proposed construction activities will generally include the installation of dark fiber and metro cell nodes, to transport and transmit communications by wireless and wireline carriers in California. These 12 Unless otherwise noted, items labeled “Rule” are from the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.
- 5 -
223 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
will be small scale, such as short conduit routes, installation of poles, or conduit where existing facilities are inadequate, and small, above-ground facilities in roadways and other previously developed rights of way.
These activities fall within the following classes of projects that are exempt from CEQA and for which neither an Environmental Impact Report nor a Negative Declaration is required.
Class 1 Exemption: operation, repair, maintenance, leasing or minor alteration of existing public or private structures and facilities, with negligible or no expansion of an existing use. This includes existing facilities used to provide public utility services. (14 CCR § 15301.)
Class 3 Exemption: construction including water main, sewage, electrical, gas and other utility extensions of reasonable length to serve such construction. This includes the construction of limited numbers of new small facilities or utility extensions. (14 CCR § 15303.)
ESI’s proposed activities involve construction of reasonably short utility extensions (Class 3). In order to provide its service, ESI will install its dark fiber and metro cell nodes in existing roadways and rights of way. The fiber will either be attached to existing poles or will be placed underground in existing conduits or, if there are no poles and no underground conduit, ESI will add them to the existing right of way. Exemption of these activities is consistent with Commission precedent. ESI’s proposed new construction activities are like those undertaken by other carriers that we have decided are categorically exempt from CEQA. See, e.g, D.06-04-063 (ClearLinx Network Corporation); D.06-04-067 (CA-CLEC LLC).
ESI requests approval to utilize a procedure for expedited review of its projects once it is aware of a specific site(s) in which it plans construction. The proposed procedure tracks the expedited review procedure that we have - 6 -
224 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
approved for other carriers. Such a process will expedite CEQA review and is appropriate for the type of construction outlined here, which will be categorically exempt. By establishing this expedited review process, we can review the information on a specific project to confirm that it is categorically exempt from CEQA or to explain why further environmental review is required.
At the same time, the proposed CEQA review process will enable ESI to undertake construction of its projects in an efficient manner without experiencing delays caused by an unnecessarily protracted CEQA review.
As we provided for other carriers, the following procedure will be used to obtain Commission approval of ESI’s claimed CEQA exemptions for proposed construction projects:
ESI will provide the Commission’s Energy Division with:
A detailed description of the proposed project,
including:
Customer(s) to be served;
The precise location of the proposed construction
project; and
Regional and local site maps.
A description of the environmental setting, to include at a minimum:
Cultural, historical, and paleontological resources;
Biological resources; and
Current land use and zoning.
A construction workplan, to include:
Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Archaeological Resources;
Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Biological Resources;
- 7 -
225 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
A detailed schedule of construction activities, including site restoration activities;
A description of construction/installation techniques; A list of other agencies contacted with respect to siting, land use planning, and environmental resource issues,
including contact information; and
A list of permits required for the proposed project.
A statement of the CEQA exemption(s) applicable to the proposed project; and
Documentation and factual evidence enough to support
a finding that the claimed exemption(s) is (are)
applicable.
The Energy Division will review ESI’s submission for the proposed project to confirm that the claimed exemption(s) from CEQA are applicable.
Within 21 days from the date of ESI’s submittal, the
Energy Division will issue either:
A Notice to Proceed (NTP) and file a Notice of
Exemption with the State Clearinghouse, Office of
Planning and Research, or
A letter of denial stating the specific reasons why the claimed exemption(s) are not applicable to the proposed project.
We have reviewed the application and find that:
ESI’s proposed facilities-based project activities are very limited;
These activities would in almost all circumstances be very likely to qualify for an exemption from CEQA; and
The proposed process for reviewing the applicability of CEQA exemptions to ESI’s facilities-based projects is not only adequate for the Commission’s purposes as CEQA
Lead Agency, but is also in the public interest because it enables ESI to respond in a timely manner to requests for - 8 -
226 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
service without the delay or burden of a full CEQA review when such review is unnecessary.
We therefore approve ESI’s proposed process for Commission review of claimed CEQA exemptions for construction projects undertaken pursuant to ESI’s full facilities-based authority, based on the specific facts of this case with the following modifications related to the Commission’s Energy Division review and approval or disapproval of the proposed exemptions.
If the Energy Division disapproves ESI’s claimed CEQA exemption(s) and issues a letter of denial to ESI, ESI must either re-design the specific project and facilities and then reapply for a finding of exemption from CEQA, or file a formal application with the Commission seeking the requisite approval and full CEQA review, before commencing any construction activities.
ESI shall not perform any full facilities-based construction activities without first obtaining an NTP from the Energy Division or authorization by the Commission after the requisite environmental review.
We have previously determined that the public convenience and necessity require that competition be allowed in the provision of competitive local exchange service, Rulemaking 95-04-043/Investigation 95-04-044. Granting this application will benefit the public interest by expanding the availability of technologically advanced telecommunications services within the state.
4. Financial Qualifications
To be granted a CPCN, an applicant for authority to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive local exchange and interexchange services must demonstrate that it has a minimum of $100,000 cash or cash equivalent, - 9 -
227 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
reasonably liquid and readily available to meet the firm’s start-up expenses.13 An applicant must also demonstrate that it has sufficient additional resources to cover all deposits required by local exchange carriers and/or interexchange carriers in order to provide the proposed service.14 In this proceeding, ESI provided its audited financial statements for 2017 and 2018 showing that $100,000, plus an amount equal to the deposits required by AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, and Consolidated Communications would be available to ESI for one year following certification.
Since ESI has provided documentation that it possesses a minimum of $100,000 that is reasonably liquid and available, it has demonstrated that it has enough funds to meet its start-up expenses and has fulfilled this requirement. ESI’s financial documentation will be subject to verification and review by the Commission for one year to ensure that such funds are available.
5. Technical Qualifications
To be granted a CPCN for authority to provide competitive local exchange and interexchange service, an applicant must make a reasonable showing of managerial and technical expertise in telecommunications or a related business.15 ESI has been a part of the telecommunications industry nationwide for many years and supplied biographical information on its management in Exhibit I (eye) to its application that demonstrates it and they have sufficient expertise and 13 The financial requirement for Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLEC) is contained in D.95-12-056, Appendix C. The financial requirement for Non-Dominant Interexchange Carriers (NDIEC) is contained in D.91-10-041.
14 The requirement for Competitive Local Carrier (CLC) applicants to demonstrate that they have additional financial resources to meet any deposits required by underlying Local Exchange Carriers (LEC) and/or IECs is set forth in D.95-12-056, Appendix C. For NDIECs, the requirement is found in D.93-05-010.
15 D.95-12-056 at Appendix C, Rule 4.A.
- 10 -
228 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
training to operate as a telecommunications provider in California. Furthermore, ESI’s wholly owned subsidiary, ESI-CA, has been providing telecommunications service in California for several years. There are no outstanding complaints against ESI-CA at this Commission and no notices of deficiencies have ever been issued against ESI-CA by this Commission. ESI represents in its application that it will share the same management team with ESI-CA, thereby benefitting from that team’s knowledge and experience with the California market.16 In its application, ESI verified that no one associated with or employed by ESI as an affiliate, officer, director, partner, or owner of more than 10 percent of ESI, or anyone acting in a management capacity for ESI:
(a) held one of these positions with a company that filed for bankruptcy; (b) been personally found liable, or held one of these positions with a company that has been found liable, for fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; (c) been convicted of a felony; (d) been (to his/her knowledge) the subject of a criminal referral by judge or public agency; (e) had a telecommunications license or operating authority denied, suspended, revoked, or limited in any jurisdiction; (f) personally entered into a settlement, or held one of these positions with a company that has entered into settlement of criminal or civil claims involving violations of §§ 17000 et seq., §§ 17200 et seq., or §§ 17500 et seq. of the California Business & Professions Code, or of any other statute, regulation, or decisional law relating to fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; or (g) been found to have violated any statute, law, or rule pertaining to public utilities or other regulated industries; or (h) entered into any settlement agreements or made any voluntary payments or agreed to any 16 Application at 8, section II, subsection 10.
- 11 -
229 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
other type of monetary forfeitures in resolution of any action by any regulatory body, agency, or attorney general.17
Also, to the best of ESI’s knowledge, neither ESI, nor any affiliate, officer, director, partner, nor owner of more than 10 percent of ESI, nor any person acting in such capacity whether or not formally appointed, is being, or has been investigated by the Federal Communications Commission or any law enforcement or regulatory agency for failure to comply with any law, rule or order.18
For the above reasons, we find that ESI has complied with the requirements of D.13-05-035.
ESI represents that no deposit is required by AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, and Consolidated Communications.19 Therefore, no additional resources are required at this time to cover deposits.
6. Tariffs
ESI has requested detariffed status. In its application, ESI states that it does not intend to offer basic service or switched access. It represents that it will provide the services described above in section one “on a non-discriminatory,” “individual case basis” and “at competitive rates.”20 ESI further represents that it will comply with all consumer protection rules identified in D.98-08-031 to the extent they are applicable to the services ESI provides. Furthermore, ESI represents that it will first comply with all tariffing obligations should it ever 17 See Application, Exhibit J, par. 4. These certifications are required by D.13-05-035, Ordering Paragraph 14.
18 Application, Exh. J, par. 4.
19 Application at 8 - 9.
20 Id. at 9, section II, subsection 13.
- 12 -
230 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
decide to offer basic services or switched access.21 Exemption from tariffing obligations is therefore appropriate.
7. Map of Service Territory
To be granted a CPCN for authority to provide competitive local exchange service, an applicant must provide a map of the service territories it proposes to serve.22 In Exhibit F to its application, ESI provided a map of the location of its proposed service territory, in compliance with this requirement.
8. Rule 3.1(i) Statement
Rule 3.1(i) sets forth the requirement that a utility filing an application under Pub. Util. Code § 1001, provide a statement regarding General Order (GO) 104-A, Section 2. ESI states that it is not aware of any reportable matters pursuant to General Order 104-A, Section 2.23 ESI, therefore, has nothing to report under this rule. On a going forward basis, though, ESI must file all reports required of a public utility under Commission jurisdiction and it has represented that it will do so.24
9. Expected Customer Base
ESI provided its estimated customer base for the first and fifth years of operation in Exhibit H of its application. Therefore, ESI has complied with this requirement.
10. Requests for Non-dominant Carrier Treatment and for Exemptions ESI requests treatment as a non-dominant interexchange carrier, which would include exemption from the requirements of Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830 21 Application 9, Section II, Subsection 13.
22 D.95-12-056 at Appendix C, Rule 4.E.
23 Application at 9, section II, subsection 14.
24 Ibid.
- 13 -
231 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
concerning stocks and securities and § 851 concerning the encumbrance and transfer of utility property. While the Commission has granted exemption from §§ 816 – 830 to others, exemption from § 851 is not commonly granted unless the exemption is expressly limited to issuances of securities and transfers or encumbrances of a utility’s assets for purposes of securing debt.25 The Commission issued detailed rules regarding exemption of non-dominant carriers in D.85-01-008, which it subsequently modified in D.85-07-081 and D.85-11-044.
ESI represents that it will provide service to business customers only, specifically, wireless service providers, and that it seeks exemption from § 851 for the limited purposes of securing debt. We grant ESI’s request for non-dominant interexchange carrier status, which provides an exemption from Pub. Util.
Code §§ 816-830, as well as ESI’s request for a limited exemption from § 851 in order to use stocks and securities to secure debt, provided that it follows all rules detailed in the above referenced decisions.
ESI also requests exemption from any requirement to maintain its books and records in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts specified in Title 47 C.F.R. Part 32. Consistent with D.99-02-038, which relieved competitive local carriers that are not part of an incumbent local exchange carrier corporate entity from the requirement to keep their books of account in conformance with the Uniform System of Accounts, we will extend similar relief to ESI.
11. Safety Considerations
With the adoption of the Safety Policy Statement of the California Public Utilities Commission on July 10, 2014, the Commission has, among other things, heightened its focus on the potential safety implications of every proceeding. We 25 See D.85-07-081; D.85-11-044; D.86-08-057 and D.90-09-032. - 14 -
232 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
have considered the potential safety implications here. The Commission is satisfied that ESI will meet the Commission’s minimum safety goals and expectations of competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) because: (1) ESI has taken steps to meet the financial requirements as set forth in this decision for a facilities-based CLEC, and (2) ESI is a public utility that is required pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 451 to “… furnish and maintain such adequate, efficient, just and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, including telephone facilities … as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public.”
12. Conclusion
We conclude that ESI’s application conforms to our rules for certification as a competitive local exchange and interexchange carrier. Accordingly, we grant ESI a CPCN to provide resold and competitive full facilities-based local exchange telecommunications service in the service territory of AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, and Consolidated Communications and interexchange service in California subject to compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Ordering Paragraphs.
The CPCN granted by this decision provides benefits to ESI and corresponding obligations. ESI receives authority to operate in the prescribed service territory, and this authority enables ESI, pursuant to 251 of the 1934 Communications Act, as amended by the 1996 Telecommunications Act (47 U.S.C. § 251), to interconnect with telecommunications carriers.26 This authority also enables ESI to obtain access to public rights-of-way in California as 26 The California Public Utilities Code uses the term “telephone corporation.” Its counterpart in federal law is a “telecommunications carrier.”
- 15 -
233 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
set forth in D.98-10-058, subject to the CEQA requirements set forth in this decision.
In return, ESI is obligated to comply with all Public Utilities Code provisions, Commission rules, General Orders, and decisions applicable to telephone corporations providing approved services. The applicable statutes, rules, General Orders, and decisions include, but are not limited to consumer protection rules, tariffing, and reporting requirements. Moreover, ESI is obligated to pay all Commission prescribed user fees and public purpose program surcharges as set forth in the Appendix B of this decision, to comply with CEQA, and to adhere to Pub. Util. Code § 451 which states that every public utility “…shall furnish and maintain such adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, including telephone facilities, as defined in § 54.1 of the Civil Code, as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public.”
13. Requests to File Under Seal
Pursuant to Rule 11.4 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, ESI has filed motions for leave to file Exhibits G, H and K to its application as confidential materials under seal. ESI represents that the information is sensitive, and disclosure could place ESI at an unfair business disadvantage. We have granted similar requests in the past and do so here.
14. Categorization and Need for Hearings
In Resolution ALJ 176-3328, dated November 29, 2018, the Commission preliminarily categorized this application as ratesetting, and preliminarily determined that hearings were necessary. No party filed a protest to the application. On April 22, 2019, the assigned ALJ held a pre-hearing conference. - 16 -
234 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
On August 12, 2019, the assigned Commissioner issued a scoping memo stating no hearing was necessary, as no one had appeared to oppose ESI’s application.
Therefore, there will be no evidentiary hearing in this matter.
15. Waiver of Comment Period
This is an uncontested matter in which the decision grants the relief requested. Accordingly, pursuant to § 311(g)(2) of the Public Utilities Code and Rule 14.6(c)(2), the otherwise applicable 30-day period for public review and comment is waived.
16. Assignment of Proceeding
Liane Randolph is the assigned Commissioner and Charles Ferguson is the assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding.
Findings of Fact
1. ESI is a telephone corporation and a public utility as defined in Pub. Util.
Code § 234(a) and § 216(a).
2. ESI’s proposed construction activities appear to fall within one or more CEQA categorical exemptions.
3. ESI has a minimum of $100,000 of cash or cash equivalent that is reasonably liquid and readily available to meet its start-up expenses.
4. ESI has enough additional cash or cash equivalent to cover deposits that may be required by other telephone corporations in order to provide the proposed service.
5. ESI’s management possesses enough experience, knowledge, and technical expertise to provide local exchange services to the public.
6. No one associated with or employed by ESI as an affiliate, officer, director, partner, agent, or owner (directly or indirectly) of more than 10 percent of ESI, or anyone acting in a management capacity for ESI: (a) held one of these positions - 17 -
235 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
with a company that filed for bankruptcy; (b) been personally found liable, or held one of these positions with a company that has been found liable, for fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; (c) been convicted of a felony; (d) been the subject of a criminal referral by judge or public agency; (e) had a telecommunications license or operating authority denied, suspended, revoked, or limited in any jurisdiction; (f) personally entered into a settlement, or held one of these positions with a company that has entered into settlement of criminal or civil claims involving violations of §§ 17000 et seq., §§ 17200 et seq., or §§ 17500 et seq. of the California Business & Professions Code, or of any other statute, regulation, or decisional law relating to fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; or (g) been found to have violated any statute, law, or rule pertaining to public utilities or other regulated industries; or (h) entered into any settlement agreements or made any voluntary payments or agreed to any other type of monetary forfeitures in resolution of any action by any regulatory body, agency, or attorney general.
7. To the best of ESI’s knowledge, neither ESI, or any affiliate, officer, director, partner, nor owner of more than 10 percent of ESI, or any person acting in such capacity whether or not formally appointed, is being, or has been investigated by the Federal Communications Commission or any law enforcement or regulatory agency for failure to comply with any law, rule or order.
8. ESI requested and is eligible for exemption from tariffing requirements and must observe the consumer protection rules adopted in D.98-08-031.
9. ESI provided a map of the location of its proposed service territory. - 18 -
236 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
10. ESI has no information to report under Rule 3.1(i), which requires that a utility filing an application under Pub. Util. Code §1001, provide a statement regarding compliance with GO 104-A, Section 2.
11. ESI provided an estimate of its customer base for the first and fifth year of operation.
12. Pursuant to Rule 11.4, ESI filed motions for leave to file confidential materials under seal, including Exhibits G, H and K to ESI’s application in this proceeding.
Conclusions of Law
1. ESI should be granted a CPCN to provide resold, full facilities-based local exchange telecommunications service in the service territories of AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, Consolidated Communications and interexchange service in California, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Ordering Paragraphs.
2. ESI should be allowed to use the Energy Division 21-day CEQA exemption process.
3. ESI, once granted a CPCN, should be subject to the applicable Commission rules, decisions, General Orders, and statutes that pertain to California public utilities.
4. ESI should be granted an exemption from the requirement to file tariffs.
5. ESI’s motion to file under seal its Exhibits G, H and K to its application, should be granted for three years.
6. ESI should be granted non-dominant carrier status, subject to Commission rules and regulations as detailed in D.85-01-008 and modified in D.85-07-081 and D.85-11-044.
- 19 -
237 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
O R D E R
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A certificate of public convenience and necessity is granted to ExteNet Services, Inc. to provide resold and competitive full facilities-based local exchange telecommunications services in the territories of Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California, Frontier California Inc., Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. d/b/a/ Frontier Communications of California, and Consolidated Communications of California Company, and interexchange service in California, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below.
2. The corporate identification number assigned to ExteNet Services, Inc., U7363C, must be included in the caption of all original filings with this Commission, and in the titles of other pleadings filed in existing cases.
3. ExteNet Services, Inc., must file, in this docket, a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding within 30 days of the effective date of this decision. Written acceptance filed in this docket does not reopen the proceeding.
4. The certificate granted by this decision will expire if not exercised within 12 months of the effective date of this decision.
5. ExteNet Services, Inc. must notify the Director of the Communications Division of the date that local exchange service is first rendered to the public, no later than five days after service first begins, by email to [email protected].
6. ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI) must obtain a performance bond of at least $25,000 in accordance with Decision 13-05-035. The performance bond must be a continuous bond (i.e., there is no termination date on the bond) issued by a corporate surety company authorized to transact surety business in California, - 20 -
238 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
and the Commission must be listed as the obligee on the bond. Within five days of acceptance of its certificate of public convenience and necessity authority, ESI must submit a Tier-1 advice letter to the Communications Division, containing a copy of the license holder’s executed bond, and submit a Tier-1 advice letter annually, but not later than March 31, with a copy of the executed bond.
7. ExteNet Services, Inc. must not allow its performance bond to lapse during any period of its operation. Pursuant to Decision 13-05-035, the Commission may revoke a certificate of public convenience and necessity if a carrier is more than 120 days late in providing the Communications Division a copy of its executed performance bond and the carrier has not been granted an extension of time by the Communications Division.
8. In addition to all the requirements applicable to competitive local exchange carriers and interexchange carriers included in Attachments B, C, and D to this decision, ExteNet Services, Inc. is subject to the Consumer Protection Rules contained in General Order (GO) 168, and all applicable Commission rules, decisions, GOs, and statutes that pertain to California public utilities.
9. ExteNet Services, Inc. must pay the public purpose surcharges specified in Attachment B, and the Combined California Public Utilities Commission Telephone Surcharge Transmittal Form must be submitted even if the amount due is $0.
10. ExteNet Services, Inc. must pay an annual minimum user fee of $100 or
0.30 percent of gross intrastate revenue, whichever is greater. Under Public Utilities Code § 405, carriers that are in default of reporting and submitting user fees for a period of 30 days or more will be subject to penalties including suspension or revocation of their authority to operate in California. - 21 -
239 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
11. Prior to initiating service, ExteNet Services, Inc. must provide the Commission’s Consumer Affairs Branch with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated contact person(s) for purposes of resolving consumer complaints. This information must be updated if the name(s), address(es), or telephone number(s) change, or at least annually.
12. Prior to initiating service, ExteNet Services, Inc. must provide the Commission’s Communications Division with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated regulatory/official contact person(s). This information must be provided electronically, using the “Regulatory/Official Contact Information Update Request” found at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/communications. This information must be updated if the name or telephone number changes, or at least annually.
13. ExteNet Services, Inc. must submit an affiliate transaction report to the Director of the Communications Division, by e-mail to
[email protected], in compliance with Decision 93-02-019, on a calendar year basis using the form contained in Attachment D.
14. ExteNet Services, Inc. must submit an annual report to the Director of the Communications Division, by email to [email protected], in compliance with General Order 104-A, on a calendar-year basis with the information contained in Attachment C to this decision.
15. ExteNet Services, Inc. must apply for expanded authority to operate without Non-dominant Interexchange Carrier status prior to construction of full facilities.
16. The staff of the Commission’s Energy Division is authorized to review, process, and act upon ExteNet Services, Inc. ’s requests for a determination that - 22 -
240 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
its full facilities-based construction activities are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
17. If ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI) wishes to engage in full facilities-based construction activities and believes that these activities are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, ESI shall first apply to the Commission’s Energy Division staff for a determination of exemption from California Environmental Quality Act by providing the Commission’s Energy Division (Energy Division) with:
a. A detailed description of the proposed project, including:
i. Customer(s) to be served;
ii. The precise location of the proposed construction
project; and
iii. Regional and local site maps.
b. A description of the environmental setting, including at a minimum:
i. Cultural, historical, and paleontological resources; ii. Biological resources; and
iii. Current land use and zoning.
c. A construction workplan, including:
i. Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Archaeological Resources;
ii. Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Biological Resources;
iii. A detailed schedule of construction activities, including site restoration activities;
iv. A description of construction/installation techniques; v. A list of other agencies contacted with respect to siting, land use planning, and environmental resource issues,
including contact information; and
vi. A list of permits required for the proposed project. - 23 -
241 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
d. A statement of the California Environmental Quality Act exemption(s) claimed to apply to the proposed project; and e. Documentation supporting the finding of exemption from California Environmental Quality Act.
f. The Energy Division will then review the submittal and notify ESI of either its approval or its denial of ESI’s claim for exemption from California Environmental Quality Act review within 21 days from the time that ESI’s submittal is complete.
18. If the Energy Division approves ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI’s) claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemption(s), the staff shall prepare a Notice to Proceed and file a Notice of Exemption with the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research. If the Energy Division disapproves ESI’s claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemptions, the staff shall issue to ESI a letter which states the specific reasons that the claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemptions do not apply to the proposed project.
19. If the Energy Division disapproves ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI’s) claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemption(s), ESI shall either re-design the specific project and facilities and then reapply for a finding of exemption from California Environmental Quality Act, or file a formal application with the Commission seeking the requisite approval and full California Environmental Quality Act review, before commencing any full facilities-based construction activities.
20. ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI’s) motion to file under seal its Exhibits G, H and K is granted for a period of three years after the date of this decision. During this three-year period, this information shall not be publicly disclosed except on further Commission order or Administrative Law Judge ruling. If ESI believes that it is necessary for this information to remain under seal for longer than - 24 -
242 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
three years, ESI may file a new motion showing good cause for extending this order by no later than 30 days before the expiration of this order.
21. Application 18-11-002 is closed.
This decision is effective today.
Dated September 26, 2019, 2019 at San Francisco, California.
MARYBEL BATJER
President
LIANE M. RANDOLPH
MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES
CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN
GENEVIEVE SHIROMA
Commissioners
- 25 -
243 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
ATTACHMENT A
This Attachment Is Intentionally Left Blank.
(END OF ATTACHMENT A)
244 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
ATTACHMENT B
REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO COMPETITIVE LOCAL EXCHANGE
CARRIERS AND INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS
1. Applicant must file, in this docket with reference to this decision number, a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding within 30 days of the effective date of this order. (Please note, written acceptance filed in this docket does not re-open the proceeding.)
2. The certificate granted and the authority to render service under the rates, charges, and rules authorized will expire if not exercised within 12 months of the date of this decision.
3. Applicant is subject to the following fees and surcharges that must be regularly remitted. Per the instructions in Exhibit E to Decision (D.) 00-10-028, the Combined California PUC Telephone Surcharge Transmittal Form must be submitted even if the amount due is $0.
a. The Universal Lifeline Telephone Service Trust
Administrative Committee Fund (Pub. Util. Code § 879);
b. The California Relay Service and Communications Devices Fund (Pub. Util. Code § 2881; D.98-12-073);
c. The California High Cost Fund-A (Pub. Util. Code § 739.3; D.96-10-066, at 3-4, App. B, Rule 1.C);
d. The California High Cost Fund-B (D.96-10-066, at 191, App. B, Rule 6.F.; D.07-12-054);
e. The California Advanced Services Fund (D.07-12-054); f. The California Teleconnect Fund (D.96-10-066, at 88, App. B, Rule 8.G);
1 245 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
g. The User Fee provided in Pub. Util. Code §§ 431-435. The minimum annual User Fee is $100, as set forth in
D.13-05-035.
Note: These fees change periodically. In compliance with Resolution T-16901, December 2, 2004, Applicant must check the joint tariff for surcharges and fees filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company (d/b/a AT&T California) and apply the current surcharge and fee amounts in that joint tariff on end-user bills until further revised. Current and historical surcharge rates can be found at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=1124.
i. Carriers must report and remit CPUC telephone
program surcharges online using the CPUC
Telecommunications and User Fees Filing System
(TUFFS). Information and instructions for online
reporting and payment of surcharges are available at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=1010. To
request a user ID and password for TUFFS online filing
and for questions, please e-mail
[email protected].
ii. Carriers must submit and pay the PUC User Fee (see
Item 3.g above) upon receiving the User Fee statement
sent by the Commission Instructions for reporting and
filing are available at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=1009.
Please send an email to [email protected] for
additional questions regarding User Fee reporting and
payment.
4. If Applicant is a competitive local exchange carrier, the effectiveness of its future competitive local exchange carrier tariffs is subject to the requirements of General Order 96-B and the Telecommunications Industry Rules (D.07-09-019).
5. If Applicant is a non-dominant interexchange carrier, the effectiveness of its future non-dominant interexchange carrier tariffs is subject to the requirement of General Order 96-B and the Telecommunications Industry Rules (D.07-09-019). 2 246 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
6. Tariff filings must reflect all fees and surcharges to which Applicant is subject, as reflected in Item 3, above.
7. Applicant must obtain a performance bond of at least $25,000 in accordance with Decision 13-05-035. The performance bond must be a continuous bond (i.e., there is no termination date on the bond) issued by a corporate surety company authorized to transact surety business in California, and the Commission must be listed as the obligee on the bond. Within five days of acceptance of its certificate of public convenience and necessity authority, Applicant must submit a Tier-1 Advice Letter to the Communications Division, containing a copy of the license holder’s executed bond, and submit a Tier-1 advice letter annually, but not later than March 31, with a copy of the executed bond.
8. Applicant must not allow its performance bond to lapse during any period of its operation. Pursuant to Decision 13-05-035, the Commission may revoke a certificate of public convenience and necessity if a carrier is more than 120 days late in providing the Communications Division a copy of its executed performance bond and the carrier has not been granted an extension of time by the Communications Division.
9. Applicants providing local exchange service must submit a service area map as part of their initial tariff to the Communications Division.
10. Prior to initiating service, Applicant must provide the Commission’s Consumer Affairs Branch with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated contact person(s) for purposes of resolving consumer complaints. This information must be updated if the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) change, or at least annually.
3 247 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
11. In addition, Applicant must provide the Commission’s Communications Division with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated regulatory/official contact persons(s). This information must be provided electronically, using the “Regulatory/Official Contact Information Update Request” found at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/communications. This information must be updated if the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) change, or at least annually.
12. Applicant must notify the Director of the Communications Division, in writing submitted by email to [email protected], no later than five days after service first begins, of the date that local exchange service is first rendered to the public.
13. Applicant must keep its books and records in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
14. In the event Applicant’s books and records are required for inspection by the Commission or its staff, it must either produce such records at the Commission’s offices or reimburse the Commission for the reasonable costs incurred in having Commission staff travel to its office.
15. Applicant must submit an annual report to the Director of the Communications Division at [email protected], in compliance with GO 104-A, on a calendar-year basis with the information contained in Attachment C to this decision.
16. Applicant must submit an affiliate transaction report to the Director of the Communications Division at [email protected], in compliance with D.93-02-019, on a calendar-year basis using the form contained in Attachment D.
17. Applicant must ensure that its employees comply with the provisions of Pub. Util. Code § 2889.5 regarding solicitation of customers. 4 248 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
18. Within 60 days of the effective date of this order, Applicant must comply with Pub. Util. Code § 708, Employee Identification Cards, and notify the Director of the Communications Division of its compliance in writing, by email to [email protected].
19. If Applicant is 90 days or more late in submitting an annual report, or in remitting the surcharges and fee listed in Item 3 above, and has not received written permission from the Communications Division to file or remit late, the Communications Division must prepare for Commission consideration a resolution that revokes Applicant’s CPCN.
20. Applicant is exempt from Rule 3.1(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.
21. Applicant is exempt from Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830, and 851.
22. If Applicant decides to discontinue service or file for bankruptcy, it must immediately notify the Communications Division’s Bankruptcy Coordinator.
23. Applicant must send a copy of this decision to concerned local permitting agencies no later than 30 days from the date of this order. (END OF ATTACHMENT B)
5 249 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
ATTACHMENT C
ANNUAL REPORT
An original and a machine readable, copy using Microsoft Word or compatible format must be submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, Communications Division, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102-3298, no later than March 31st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted. In addition, an electronic copy of the report must be emailed to [email protected].
Failure to submit this information on time may result in a penalty as provided for in Pub. Util. Code §§ 2107 and 2108.
Required information:
1. Exact legal name and U # of the reporting utility.
2. Address.
3. Name, title, address, and telephone number of the person to be contacted concerning the reported information.
4. Name and title of the officer having custody of the general books of account and the address of the office where such books are kept.
5. Type of organization (e.g., corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.).
If incorporated, specify:
a. Date of filing articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State. b. State in which incorporated.
6. Number and date of the Commission decision granting the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity.
7. Date operations were begun.
8. Description of other business activities in which the utility is engaged.
9. List of all affiliated companies and their relationship to the utility. State if affiliate is a:
a. Regulated public utility.
b. Publicly held corporation.
10. Balance sheet as of December 31st of the year for which information is submitted.
1 250 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
11. Income statement for California operations for the calendar year for which information is submitted.
12. Cash Flow statement as of December 31st of the calendar year for which information is submitted, for California operations only.
For any questions concerning this report, please send an email to [email protected] with a subject line that includes: “CD Annual Reports.”
(END OF ATTACHMENT C)
2 251 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
ATTACHMENT D
CALENDAR YEAR AFFILIATE TRANSACTION REPORT
An original and a machine readable, copy using Microsoft Word and Excel, or compatible format must be submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, Communications Division, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102-3298, no later than May 1st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted. In addition, an electronic copy of the report must be emailed to [email protected].
1. Each utility must list and provide the following information for each affiliated entity and regulated subsidiary that the utility had during the period covered by the Annual Affiliate Transaction Report.
Form of organization (e.g., corporation, partnership, joint venture, strategic alliance, etc.);
Brief description of business activities engaged in;
Relationship to the utility (e.g., controlling corporation, subsidiary, regulated subsidiary, affiliate);
Ownership of the utility (including type and percent
ownership)
Voting rights held by the utility and percent; and
Corporate officers.
2. The utility must prepare and submit a corporate organization chart showing any and all corporate relationships between the utility and its affiliated entities and regulated subsidiaries in Item 1 above. The chart must have the controlling corporation (if any) at the top of the chart, the utility and any subsidiaries and/or affiliates of the controlling corporation in the middle levels of the chart, and all secondary subsidiaries and affiliates (e.g., a subsidiary that in turn is owned by another subsidiary and/or affiliate) in the lower levels. Any regulated subsidiary must be clearly noted.
1 252 of 642
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil
3. For a utility that has individuals who are classified as “controlling corporations” of the competitive utility, the utility must only report under the requirements of Items 1 and 2 above any affiliated entity that either (a) is a public utility or (b) transacts any business with the utility filing the annual report excluding the provision of tariff services.
4. Each annual report must be signed by a corporate officer of the utility stating under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California (CCP 2015.5) that the annual report is complete and accurate with no material omissions.
5. Any required material that a utility is unable to provide must be reasonably described and the reasons the data cannot be obtained, as well as the efforts expended to obtain the information, must be set forth in the utility’s Annual Affiliate Transaction Report and verified in accordance with Section I-F of Decision 93-02-019.
6. Utilities that do not have affiliated entities must submit, in lieu of the annual transaction report, an annual statement to the Commission stating that the utility had no affiliated entities during the report period. This statement must be signed by a corporate officer of the utility, stating under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California (CCP 2015.5) that the annual report is complete and accurate with no material omissions.
For any questions concerning this report, please send an email to [email protected] with a subject line that includes: “CD Annual Reports.”
(END OF ATTACHMENT D)
2 253 of 642
REFERENCE COPY
This is not an official FCC license. It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated. In cases where FCC rules require the presentation, posting, or display of an FCC license, this document may not be used in place of an official FCC license.
Federal Communications Commission
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION
LICENSEE: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Call Sign File Number
KNKA209
ATTN: REGULATORY Radio Service
LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CL - Cellular
5055 NORTH POINT PKWY, NP2NE NETWORK ENGINEERING
ALPHARETTA, GA 30022 Market Numer
CMA002
Channel Block
B
Sub-Market Designator
0 FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0002963817
Market Name
Los Angeles-Long Beach/Anaheim
Grant Date
08-26-2014
Effective Date
11-01-2016
Expiration Date Five Yr Build-Out Date Print Date
10-01-2024
Site Information:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
6 33-56-38.2 N 116-53-37.3 W 915.0
Address: 1999 8TH STREET
51.2 1011029
City: BANNING County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-417.800 269.800
91.830 91.830
90 135
-7.400
91.830
180
64.200
91.830
225
272.000
91.830
270
202.300
91.830
315
-88.300
91.830
-668.200
91.830
Conditions:
Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606.
FCC 601-C
254 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
10 34-30-25.0 N 117-54-06.3 W 926.8 33.5
Address: 12747 PEARBLOSSOM HIGHWAY
City: Pearblossom County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
-29.400
135
-328.400
200.000
180
-564.200 -289.100 -8.200
200.000 200.000 200.000
225 270 315
133.600
200.000
116.900 94.400
200.000 200.000 200.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
11 34-08-51.0 N 118-41-54.3 W 234.4 21.3
Address: 4937 LAS VIRGENES ROAD
City: CALABASAS County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-26.900
93.330
90 -90.200
93.330
135
-182.500
93.330
180
42.000
93.330
225
-144.500 -34.300
93.330 93.330
270 315
184.100
93.330
-160.900
93.330
Location Latitude Longitude
116-26-03.0 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
12 Address: 70500 VARNER RD.
33-52-01.1 N 476.1 37.2
City: DESERT HOT SPRINGS County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
419.200
85.110
180
366.400
24.550
225
352.700
2.750
270
234.700
0.200
315
214.200
0.200
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -61.800
3.800
-211.400 183.500
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 6
28.840 91.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
419.200
2.370
180
366.400
15.660
225
352.700
31.940
270
234.700
25.130
315
214.200
6.090
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -61.800
0.580
-211.400 183.500
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 7
0.100 0.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135
419.200
0.700
180
366.400
0.400
225
352.700
2.370
270
234.700
30.450
315
214.200
125.700
-61.800 -211.400 183.500
159.760 78.440 12.150
FCC 601-C
255 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
14 34-31-47.0 N 118-08-42.3 W 1334.0 42.7
Address: 35660 VISTA VIEW TERRACE
City: PALMDALE County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
578.400
42.930
90 482.000
29.600
135
143.100
14.430
180
268.300
38.260
225
476.600
24.800
270
313.000
7.300
315
379.200
29.950
566.300
43.010
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
15 34-36-37.1 N 117-17-17.3 W 1376.6 27.4
Address: 17232 ORO GRANDE PEAK ROAD
City: VICTORVILLE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
339.700
56.330
90 434.200
17.180
135
487.100
0.590
180
535.000
0.240
225
507.100
0.240
270
549.400
0.820
315
571.400
23.790
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 454.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 60.630
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
340.500
0.490
90 434.900
6.630
135
487.700
27.690
180
535.600
47.610
225
507.700
40.110
270
550.000
14.060
315
572.000
1.790
455.400
0.240
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
16 34-23-11.0 N 118-19-47.2 W 1481.3 30.5
Address: 11005 SANTA CLARA DIVIDE RD., 8 MI N OF
City: LOS ANGELES County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
78.900
135
506.700
12.600
180
856.500
0.290
225
908.500
3.640
270
872.400
43.660
315
901.100
101.550
738.500
87.060
640.900
100.090 74.220
FCC 601-C
256 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
17 33-49-38.0 N 116-57-15.0 W 1083.0 15.5
Address: 40480 SOBOBA ROAD
City: SAN JACINTO County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
245.500
0.510
90 135 180
580.100
25.340
225
623.300
22.840
270
604.100
5.030
315
487.900
0.200
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 325.900
0.200
-151.100 487.000
Transmitting ERP (watts) 7.560 Antenna: 3
24.990
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
245.500
0.100
90 135 180
580.100
3.840
225
623.300
10.190
270
604.100
10.010
315
487.900
8.530
325.900
1.480
-151.100 487.000
0.100 0.280
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
19 34-05-06.0 N 118-46-57.3 W 842.4 16.8
Address: 1953 LATIGO CANYON ROAD
City: MALIBU County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
528.300
4.020
90 404.700
0.380
135
722.400
0.100
180
615.600
0.100
225
591.600
0.100
270
449.600
0.330
315
520.100
3.580
457.000
16.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
23 34-48-09.9 N 118-48-53.3 W 1485.0 31.1
Address: Gorman Peak Site 37411 GORMAN POST ROAD
City: GORMAN County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
130.500
4.110
90 522.900
215.770
135
363.600
27.160
180
531.400
1.560
225
265.600
0.540
270
-158.700
0.540
315
438.900
0.540
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 493.200
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.540
Antenna: 6
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
130.500
0.480
90 522.900
1.010
135
363.600
6.830
180
531.400
242.180
225
265.600
6.230
270
-158.700
0.920
315
438.900
0.480
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 493.200
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.480
Antenna: 7
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
130.500
0.540
90 522.900
0.540
135
363.600
0.540
180
531.400
0.540
225
265.600
4.110
270
-158.700
215.770
315
438.900
27.160
493.200
1.560
FCC 601-C
257 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
24 Address: 29101 Hospital Road
34-15-54.0 N 117-10-08.1 W 1620.3 13.4
City: Lake Arrowhead County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
-283.100 -77.700
200.000
135 180
553.300
200.000
225
602.400
200.000
270
233.100
200.000
315
388.000
200.000
309.100 0.000
200.000 200.000 200.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
28 33-31-32.1 N 115-56-38.0 W -64.0 31.7
Address: 98775 HIGHWAY 111
City: MECCA County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
37.100
3.390
225
32.100
33.110
270
31.800
95.500
315
-53.700
63.100
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -334.700
10.230
-474.700 -122.900 24.800
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.950 0.200 0.350
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
37.100
99.530
225
32.100
12.530
270
31.800
1.070
315
-53.700
0.500
-334.700
2.180
-474.700 -122.900 24.800
18.960 137.390 250.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
29 33-46-17.1 N 118-22-10.3 W 272.2 15.5
Address: 734 SILVER SPUR ROAD
City: ROLLING HILLS County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
263.800
6.680
90 256.200
6.680
135
80.700
6.680
180
282.000
6.680
225
142.000
6.680
270
176.100
6.680
315
266.400
6.680
247.600
6.680
FCC 601-C
258 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
31 33-23-12.1 N 118-24-08.6 W 479.2 39.7
Address: 5 miles NW of Avalon, ON BLACK JACK MTN.
City: Santa Catalina ISLAN County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
473.800
0.100
90 478.100
0.960
135
157.500
1.740
180
383.600
0.240
225
196.000
0.100
270
365.500
0.100
315
282.600
0.100
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 472.000
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.100
Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
473.800
0.100
90 478.100
0.100
135
157.500
0.100
180
383.600
0.100
225
196.000
0.100
270
365.500
0.380
315
282.600
1.950
472.000
0.690
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
32 33-39-19.1 N 115-27-12.9 W 1147.8 35.7
Address: CHUCKWALLA CELL SITE: 6 MILES SW OF
City: DESERT CENTER County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
909.500
34.990
90 545.300
34.990
135
242.600
34.990
180
479.000
34.990
225
655.200
34.990
270
690.100
34.990
315
569.500
34.990
851.900
34.990
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
34 34-54-53.1 N 117-31-27.4 W 997.9 25.9
Address: KRAMER HILLS ROAD AND HIGHWAY 395
City: 5 MI S OF KRAMER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
265.900
0.840
90 246.000
11.380
135
150.000
81.100
180
146.300
57.810
225
114.200
6.110
270
118.300
0.320
315
219.700
0.200
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 242.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.200
Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
265.900
0.860
90 246.000
48.980
135
150.000
34.670
180
146.300
0.870
225
114.200
0.200
270
118.300
0.200
315
219.700
0.200
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 242.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.200
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
265.900
68.230
90 246.000
8.260
135
150.000
0.410
180
146.300
0.200
225
114.200
0.200
270
118.300
0.780
315
219.700
8.430
242.800
70.790
FCC 601-C
259 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
36 33-36-20.1 N 114-54-07.9 W 118.6 53.0
Address: WILEYS WELL ROAD AND INTERSTATE 10
City: 14 M. W. OF BLYTHE County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-118.400 24.600
200.000 200.000 200.000
90 135
-35.200
200.000
180
0.200
200.000
225
1.000
200.000
270
45.700
200.000
315
39.500
200.000
-98.800
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
37 35-26-09.9 N 115-55-29.0 W 1354.2 40.5
Address: TURQUOISE MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS CELL SITE: 14 MILES NORTHEAST OF City: BAKER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
176.800
135
312.300
200.000
180
610.900
200.000
225
621.100
200.000
270
701.400
200.000
315
470.500
200.000
360.700 223.700
200.000 200.000 200.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
38 34-42-36.0 N 116-09-07.0 W 634.0 60.7
Address: 25255 BAGDAD CHASE ROAD; 3 MI S OF
City: LUDLOW County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
81.700
135
151.500
183.670
180
25.100
183.670
225
-88.300
183.670
270
35.600
183.670
315
71.400
183.670
255.100 63.800
183.670 183.670 183.670
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
39 Address: 1111 BAILEY AVE
34-50-05.0 N 114-37-03.0 W 186.2 34.7 1025847
City: NEEDLES County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
27.900
1.120
135
67.800
0.400
180
-91.000
0.400
225
-244.700 -271.000
1.240 12.740
270 315
-51.900
120.790
67.300 22.600
157.770 22.540
FCC 601-C
260 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
39 Address: 1111 BAILEY AVE
34-50-05.0 N 114-37-03.0 W 186.2 34.7 1025847
City: NEEDLES County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
22.600
1.600
90 27.900
22.750
135
67.800
162.190
180
-91.000
115.620
225 270 315
-51.900
0.400
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 67.300
0.400
-244.700 -271.000
Transmitting ERP (watts) 12.220
Antenna: 5
0.640
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
22.600
0.400
90 27.900
0.830
135
67.800
7.910
180
-91.000
72.620
225 270 315
-51.900
15.140
67.300
1.040
-244.700 -271.000
196.800 110.160
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
40 34-09-11.6 N 116-23-22.4 W 1156.1 24.4 1263982
Address: Yucca Valley Site 58399 Serin Drive
City: YUCCA VALLEY County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
270.600
49.430
90 356.000
311.890
135
110.600
159.960
180
-53.900
10.570
225
154.300
1.390
270
-106.700
0.680
315
-1.300
0.680
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 194.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 2.780
Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
270.600
0.680
90 356.000
0.680
135
110.600
3.500
180
-53.900
35.810
225
154.300
284.450
270
-106.700
196.790
315
-1.300
14.930
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 194.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.360
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
356.000
4.610
135
110.600
0.710
180
-53.900
0.680
225
154.300
0.680
270
-106.700
10.090
315
-1.300
156.310
194.400 270.600
319.150 58.080
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
41 33-39-17.7 N 115-59-10.8 W 560.0 38.4
Address: INTERSTATE 10, 12 MILES EAST OF
City: INDIO County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-376.300 189.300
0.100 0.160
90 135
272.700
2.400
180
507.000
14.390
225
541.900
7.620
270
491.700
0.770
315
229.100
0.100
-249.500
0.100
FCC 601-C
261 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
41 33-39-17.7 N 115-59-10.8 W 560.0 38.4
Address: INTERSTATE 10, 12 MILES EAST OF
City: INDIO County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-376.300 189.300
2.470 0.200
90 135
272.700
0.200
180
507.000
0.200
225
541.900
1.770
270
491.700
25.230
315
229.100
99.770
-249.500
30.760
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
42 35-19-26.8 N 117-37-05.2 W 998.5 25.6
Address: .4 MILES WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 395 4 MILES SOUTH OF JOHANNESBURG City: SAN BERNARDINO County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
106.600
85.320
180
116.800
12.330
225
64.100
0.800
270
-36.500
0.400
315
68.700
2.520
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 0.100 -127.300 173.100
Transmitting ERP (watts) 144.890 195.450
Antenna: 4
30.900
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-127.300 173.100
15.170 100.240
90 135
106.600
200.000
180
116.800
132.140
225
64.100
24.610
270
-36.500
2.240
315
68.700
0.400
0.100
1.150
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
43 35-07-57.9 N 116-12-23.1 W 468.8 34.7
Address: RASOR ROAD AND INTERSTATE 15 16 MILES SOUTHWEST OF City: BAKER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
158.900
135
177.300
183.670
180
113.600
183.670
225
118.000
183.670
270
146.900
183.670
315
-272.200
183.670
-195.100 115.600
183.670 183.670 183.670
FCC 601-C
262 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
44 33-40-53.1 N 115-14-52.9 W 220.7 49.8
Address: CORN SPRINGS ROAD & INTERSTATE 10 9 MILES EAST OF DESERT CENTER City: Corn Springs County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
131.000
135
61.800
200.000
180
-133.600 -362.100 -99.600
200.000 200.000 200.000
225 270 315
89.600
200.000
127.000 40.100
200.000 200.000 200.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
45 33-29-37.1 N 116-47-42.0 W 1136.0 25.6
Address: 43395 MCCAIN LANE; 5 MILES NE OF
City: AGUANGA County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
-98.200
135
-165.800
2.080
180
131.300
0.500
225
372.900
0.500
270
554.800
0.500
315
287.600
0.500
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -65.300
2.940
-42.700
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 4
106.640 79.060
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-42.700
0.340
90 -98.200
0.340
135
-165.800
0.340
180
131.300
0.710
225
372.900
4.790
270
554.800
169.820
315
287.600
4.370
-65.300
0.650
Location Latitude Longitude
116-35-41.1 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
46 Address: Fort Irwin Military Base
35-27-10.9 N 1603.0 26.2 1215044
City: Fort Irwin County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
503.700
4.300
90 552.800
49.710
135
657.000
106.690
180
724.400
33.400
225
627.500
3.890
270
595.200
0.610
315
719.100
0.610
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 659.700
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.960
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
503.700
0.890
90 552.800
0.610
135
657.000
0.700
180
724.400
4.240
225
627.500
82.600
270
595.200
306.890
315
719.100
92.680
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 659.700
Transmitting ERP (watts) 3.440
Antenna: 6
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
552.800
135
657.000
0.430
180
724.400
0.430
225
627.500
0.430
270
595.200
0.430
315
719.100
13.790
659.700 503.700
125.500 153.290 39.110
FCC 601-C
263 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
47 34-04-48.0 N 114-46-45.0 W 277.7 60.7 1030851
Address: STATE HIGHWAY 62
City: RICE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
-20.100
0.680
135
65.300
0.400
180
115.700
0.400
225
98.800
0.400
270
63.200
0.780
315
65.700
6.650
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -162.100 3.500
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 4
200.950 5.410
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
3.500
0.780
90 -20.100
6.650
135
65.300
200.950
180
115.700
5.410
225
98.800
0.680
270
63.200
0.400
315
-65.700
0.400
-162.100
0.400
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
48 34-10-45.1 N 114-34-04.9 W 269.8 53.0
Address: 4200 STATE HIGHWAY 95
City: VIDAL JUNCTION County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-72.300
80.350
90 65.200
357.270
135
134.100
341.190
180
51.000
69.500
225
26.400
6.580
270
-35.500
0.860
315
-43.200
0.860
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -103.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 5.330
Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-72.300
1.080
90 65.200
1.080
135
134.100
13.900
180
51.000
173.780
225
26.400
540.750
270
-35.500
130.920
315
-43.200
9.820
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -103.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.230
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
65.200
3.040
135
134.100
1.080
180
51.000
1.080
225
26.400
3.370
270
-35.500
34.510
315
-43.200
327.340
-103.400 -72.300
427.560 61.090
Location Latitude Longitude
114-24-59.8 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
49 Address: 12121 Malamedia Rd.
34-28-42.0 N 175.7 53.0
City: HAVASU LAKE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 7
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-41.700
65.260
90 -25.600
36.320
135
23.800
5.710
180
-147.000 -70.800
0.490 0.370
225 270
-116.100
2.880
315
-221.600
21.870
62.100
55.790
FCC 601-C
264 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
49 Address: 12121 Malamedia Rd.
34-28-42.0 N 114-24-59.8 W 175.7 53.0
City: HAVASU LAKE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 8
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-41.700
11.170
90 -25.600
42.900
135
23.800
65.740
180 225 270
-116.100
1.850
315
-221.600
0.370
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 62.100
0.730
-147.000 -70.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 53.820
Antenna: 9
16.090
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-41.700
0.350
90 -25.600
0.350
135
23.800
0.350
180 225 270
-116.100
170.780
315
-221.600
50.400
62.100
1.630
-147.000 -70.800
1.240 44.920
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
50 34-38-38.9 N 116-37-36.0 W 1815.7 37.8
Address: 21411 CAMP ROCK ROAD 15 MILES SOUTH OF NEWBERRY SPRINGS City: Newberry Springs County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
743.900
0.400
90 677.300
0.400
135
839.400
1.260
180
833.100
38.110
225
662.000
191.000
270
512.600
76.040
315
548.900
3.320
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 824.700
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.400
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
677.300
1.050
135
839.400
0.400
180
833.100
0.400
225
662.000
0.500
270
512.600
3.480
315
548.900
83.370
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 824.700 743.900
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 4
186.650 31.700
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
743.900
14.830
90 677.300
144.890
135
839.400
141.590
180
833.100
12.050
225
662.000
0.940
270
512.600
0.400
315
548.600
0.400
824.700
0.910
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
51 35-14-12.0 N 115-25-24.0 W 1471.6 42.1
Address: CIMA ROAD AND RANCH ROAD 4.5 MILES EAST OF
City: CIMA County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
269.400
9.350
90 -214.300 -119.100
77.810 195.450
135 180
-157.300 302.100
129.130 25.180
225 270
121.100
3.030
315
119.900
0.490
417.900
1.120
FCC 601-C
265 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
51 35-14-12.0 N 115-25-24.0 W 1471.6 42.1
Address: CIMA ROAD AND RANCH ROAD 4.5 MILES EAST OF
City: CIMA County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
269.400
0.470
90 135 180 225 270
121.100
70.960
315
119.900
8.730
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 417.900
0.960
-214.300 -119.100
3.170
-157.300 302.100
Transmitting ERP (watts) 135.220
Antenna: 4
26.980 186.650
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180 225 270
121.100
44.770
315
119.900
151.720
417.900 269.400 -214.300 -119.100 -157.300 302.100
195.450 138.370 31.700 3.640 1.050 5.510
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
52 34-07-59.0 N 116-03-59.0 W 680.3 29.3
Address: 73195 CACTUS DRIVE
City: TWENTYNINE PALMS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
139.300
135
-190.300
200.000
180
-632.400 -495.000 -49.300
200.000 200.000 200.000
225 270 315
23.700
200.000
134.700 155.500
200.000 200.000 200.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
53 34-52-50.7 N 115-04-05.9 W 1097.6 30.5
Address: GOFF'S BUTTE CELL SITE: 3.7 MILES NORTH OF I-40; .5 MILES WEST OF
MOUNTAIN SPRI
City: GOFFS BUTTE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
397.500
135
375.600
100.000
180
176.300
100.000
225
416.300
100.000
270
380.300
100.000
315
233.200
100.000
250.200 340.200
100.000 100.000 100.000
FCC 601-C
266 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
55 35-45-58.8 N 116-19-43.0 W 453.0 20.7
Address: (IBEX site) STATE HIGHWAY 127, 35 MILES NW OF
City: BAKER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
-16.900
5.780
135
191.800
0.890
180
269.700
0.460
225
270.300
0.460
270
212.000
8.550
315
-397.200
110.100
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -83.200 -87.600
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 4
224.790 93.710
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-87.600
4.190
90 -16.900
57.780
135
191.800
224.790
180
269.700
159.140
225
270.300
17.450
270
212.000
1.130
315
-397.200
0.460
-83.200
0.460
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
56 34-18-34.1 N 114-09-55.8 W 523.8 6.1
Address: BLACK METAL MT. COMMUN. SITE; 2 MI NW OF
City: PARKER DAM County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
94.400
0.800
90 251.600
0.800
135
185.000
1.260
180
304.800
16.290
225
249.100
235.500
270
0.000
296.480
315
345.600
25.230
220.200
1.100
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
57 35-14-23.8 N 116-44-47.4 W 1098.8 26.2 1215047
Address: (FT IRWIN) Gate of Fort Irwin Military Base
City: Fort Irwin County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
283.200
7.300
90 378.100
91.300
135
281.200
284.110
180
362.300
68.780
225
130.800
5.160
270
-56.000
0.650
315
83.500
0.570
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 128.000
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.570
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
378.100
135
281.200
5.160
180
362.300
0.650
225
130.800
0.570
270
-56.000
0.570
315
83.500
7.300
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 128.000
91.300
283.200
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 4
284.110 68.780
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
283.200
2.270
90 378.100
0.570
135
281.200
0.570
180
362.300
1.200
225
130.800
13.660
270
-56.000
141.740
315
83.500
251.470
128.000
42.310
FCC 601-C
267 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
59 33-37-03.0 N 114-46-23.0 W 247.6 37.2 1048302
Address: LOWER MCCOY PEAK
City: BLYTHE County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
183.600
135
192.400
100.000
180
161.700
100.000
225
129.300
100.000
270
144.200
100.000
315
-158.200
100.000
112.500 147.100
100.000 100.000 100.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
62 34-07-14.0 N 115-46-07.9 W 399.6 54.3
Address: 14 MILES E OF TWENTYNINE PALMS; STATE HWY 62 (29 PALMS HWY); ASSESORS
PARCEL NUM
City: TWENTYNINE PALMS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-127.200 42.200
200.000 200.000 200.000
90 135
-239.300
200.000
180
-136.200 -226.200 -16.000
200.000 200.000 200.000
225 270 315
36.500
200.000
-105.500
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
63 33-45-00.0 N 114-31-28.8 W 204.3 9.8
Address: BIG MARIA COMMUNIUCATIONS SITE, 11 MILES N OF BLYTHE, OFF HIGHWAY 95 City: RIVERSIDE County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
107.700
2.640
90 76.400
0.290
135
71.900
0.200
180
129.400
0.200
225
108.800
0.200
270
-49.800
0.440
315
-150.000
6.710
121.100
96.160
Location Latitude Longitude
116-14-22.0 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
64 Address: 81600 Avenue 58
33-37-47.0 N -17.3 33.5
City: La Quinta County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-7.600
0.400
90 35.200
0.400
135
44.400
1.320
180
-315.900 -942.000 -454.200
12.050 117.770 151.720
225 270 315
-44.500
17.830
3.200
1.380
FCC 601-C
268 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
64 Address: 81600 Avenue 58
33-37-47.0 N 116-14-22.0 W -17.3 33.5
City: La Quinta County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
35.200
135
44.400
0.790
180 225 270 315
-44.500
233.310
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 3.200 -7.600 -315.900 -942.000 -454.200 Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.690
Antenna: 4
244.310 137.390 11.690 2.280 51.040
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-7.600
49.090
90 35.200
200.000
135
44.400
53.830
180 225 270 315
-44.500
0.780
3.200
3.560
-315.900 -942.000 -454.200
4.200 0.560 0.400
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
79 34-31-07.0 N 115-08-45.0 W 1327.4 15.9
Address: OLD WOMAN CELL SITE 1.69 MILES SOUTH OF SNFLWR SPRING SPUR, 18.1 MILES E
City: OLD WOMAN County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
690.400
135
645.800
150.000
180
574.600
150.000
225
395.800
150.000
270
574.700
150.000
315
224.800
150.000
323.300 522.400
150.000 150.000 150.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
118 34-09-02.0 N 115-08-25.0 W 570.0 53.0
Address: IRON MOUNTAINS CELL SITE 1.19 MILES WEST OF IRON MTN PUMPING ROAD 4.9
MILES N
City: IRON MOUNTAINS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
405.100
23.120
90 411.700
210.860
135
358.100
319.150
180
222.400
80.170
225
150.900
2.910
270
176.500
0.680
315
287.700
0.680
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 400.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.680
Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
405.100
0.860
90 411.700
2.190
135
358.100
23.010
180
222.400
188.360
225
150.900
430.530
270
176.500
202.770
315
287.700
25.180
400.400
1.360
FCC 601-C
269 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
118 34-09-02.0 N 115-08-25.0 W 570.0 53.0
Address: IRON MOUNTAINS CELL SITE 1.19 MILES WEST OF IRON MTN PUMPING ROAD 4.9
MILES N
City: IRON MOUNTAINS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 5
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
411.700
1.710
135
358.100
1.710
180
222.400
1.710
225
150.900
1.710
270
176.500
1.710
315
287.700
34.990
400.400 405.100
859.010 22.590
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
128 35-34-43.7 N 117-42-30.5 W 808.0 40.2
Address: 2600 S. China Lake Blvd.
City: Ridgecrest County: KERN State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-14-2007 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
-42.300
135
-137.800
1.000
180 225 270 315
95.700
36.150
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 141.100 108.400 -238.800 -157.600 11.800 Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.040
Antenna: 2
369.910 307.680 25.010 1.000 1.000
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
108.400
1.990
90 -42.300
95.080
135
-137.800
487.640
180 225 270 315
95.700
1.000
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 141.100
1.000
-238.800 -157.600 11.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 165.230
Antenna: 3
11.700 1.000
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
108.400
1.000
90 -42.300
1.000
135
-137.800
1.000
180 225 270 315
95.700
68.880
141.100
5.350
-238.800 -157.600 11.800
10.190 222.900 455.090
Location Latitude Longitude
118-09-45.3 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
132
Address: 5701 S Eastern Ave
33-59-12.1 N 40.8 33.8
City: City of Commerce County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-22.300
1.370
90 -55.700
1.890
135
33.300
1.740
180
43.100
1.130
225
37.200
0.120
270
18.400
0.100
315
-24.000
0.100
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -73.900
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.160
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-22.300
0.100
90 -55.700
0.100
135
33.300
0.390
180
43.100
1.830
225
37.200
1.830
270
18.400
1.740
315
-24.000
0.610
-73.900
0.100
FCC 601-C
270 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
132
Address: 5701 S Eastern Ave
33-59-12.1 N 118-09-45.3 W 40.8 33.8
City: City of Commerce County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-22.300
1.560
90 -55.700
0.270
135
33.300
0.100
180
43.100
0.100
225
37.200
0.100
270
18.400
0.850
315
-24.000
1.860
-73.900
1.800
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
133 33-52-52.0 N 117-36-18.0 W 198.1 28.0 1011242
Address: (CORONA II) 519 MAPLE STREET
City: CORONA County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
21.300
32.530
90 -29.100
106.140
135
-82.300
96.220
180 225 270 315
31.300
0.330
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 30.700
4.140
-476.400 -256.800 63.500
Transmitting ERP (watts) 25.270
Antenna: 2
3.190 0.330
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
21.300
0.330
90 -29.100
1.210
135
-82.300
9.430
180 225 270 315
31.300
13.540
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 30.700
1.720
-476.400 -256.800 63.500
Transmitting ERP (watts) 59.740
Antenna: 3
146.100 77.290
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
21.300
52.490
90 -29.100
13.320
135
-82.300
1.450
180 225 270 315
31.300
45.890
30.700
71.570
-476.400 -256.800 63.500
0.330 0.900 9.410
Location Latitude Longitude
117-14-16.4 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
139
Address: 195 Black Canyon Rd
35-08-21.4 N 1190.9 15.2
City: Hinkley County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
268.000
135
395.900
100.000
180
568.000
100.000
225
560.000
100.000
270
414.200
100.000
315
223.800
100.000
213.500 241.000
100.000 100.000 100.000
FCC 601-C
271 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
140 33-36-07.4 N 117-20-38.8 W 1071.4 36.8
Address: 35603 Main Divide Truck Trail
City: Lake Elsinore County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
659.400
1.290
90 646.700
5.600
135
513.800
5.530
180
459.600
1.090
225
548.000
0.100
270
485.600
0.100
315
209.200
0.100
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 658.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.110
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
659.400
15.200
90 646.700
5.450
135
513.800
0.330
180
459.600
0.100
225
548.000
0.100
270
485.600
0.100
315
209.200
0.390
658.800
5.020
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
141 34-04-44.5 N 115-20-04.8 W 364.9 47.2
Address: 8 miles West of Hwy 177 (1A)
City: 29 Palms County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 08-18-2009 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
40.100
2.640
90 41.700
1.070
135
90.400
1.070
180 225 270 315
-75.100
372.510
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 181.600
33.220
-260.600 -334.300 -219.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 3.480
Antenna: 2
39.010 390.070
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
40.100
30.980
90 41.700
309.840
135
90.400
295.900
180 225 270 315
-75.100
0.850
181.600
2.760
-260.600 -334.300 -219.800
26.370 2.090 0.850
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
142 34-09-34.2 N 117-54-29.9 W 230.3 15.8
Address: 1964 N. San Gabriel Canyon Rd.
City: Azusa County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
88.100
4.900
225
124.300
0.400
270
-36.300
0.400
315
-802.600
0.490
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -642.800
5.020
-395.900 -358.700 -6.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
63.170 186.420 61.730
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
88.100
50.170
225
124.300
182.170
270
-36.300
77.710
315
-802.600
6.930
-642.800
0.400
-395.900 -358.700 -6.300
0.400 0.400 3.550
FCC 601-C
272 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
143 34-09-11.6 N 117-39-06.1 W 601.2 7.1
Address: 2426 N. Euclid Avenue
City: Upland County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
249.300
56.980
180
281.800
4.130
225
247.900
0.450
270
-30.300
0.450
315
-481.100
0.450
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -1293.800
1.680
-1039.300 68.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
58.300 226.820
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
249.300
0.450
180
281.800
1.680
225
247.900
58.300
270
-30.300
226.820
315
-481.100
56.980
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -1293.800
4.130
-1039.300 68.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.450 0.450
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135
249.300
0.450
180
281.800
0.450
225
247.900
0.450
270
-30.300
1.680
315
-481.100
58.300
-1293.800 -1039.300 68.300
226.820 56.980 4.130
Location Latitude Longitude
118-07-55.3 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
144
Address: 2235 N. Lake Avenue
34-11-04.0 N 372.8 11.3
City: Altadena County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
209.600
1.270
225
172.300
11.550
270
10.300
83.640
315
-585.100
225.130
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -784.300
62.010
-874.500 -285.000 221.400
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
6.060 0.460 0.460
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
209.600
0.460
225
172.300
0.460
270
10.300
1.270
315
-585.100
11.570
-784.300
83.820
-874.600 -285.000 221.400
225.590 62.130 6.070
Location Latitude Longitude
117-45-29.8 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
146
Address: 20719 East Avenue V13
34-30-05.5 N 1026.0 23.2
City: Palmdale County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
121.600
21.170
90 14.800
127.550
135
-265.300
156.920
180
-642.400 -252.800 76.300
22.170 2.600 0.380
225 270 315
173.200
0.380
179.900
2.220
FCC 601-C
273 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
146 34-30-05.5 N 117-45-29.8 W 1026.0 23.2
Address: 20719 East Avenue V13
City: Palmdale County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
121.600
0.380
90 14.800
0.380
135
-265.300
1.030
180 225 270 315
173.200
50.640
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 179.900
4.950
-642.400 -252.800 76.300
Transmitting ERP (watts) 9.430
Antenna: 3
68.310 183.860
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
14.800
135
-265.300
0.780
180 225 270 315
173.200
29.820
179.900 121.600 -642.400 -252.800 76.300
160.130 118.710 13.020 0.380 0.480 3.670
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
147
Address: 1255 Rivera Dr.
34-21-51.5 N 117-38-00.8 W 1899.0 20.4
City: Wrightwood County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
636.900
2.850
90 518.400
74.900
135
342.200
216.010
180 225 270
-269.800
0.450
315
357.800
0.450
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 677.600
0.450
-365.500 181.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 43.100
Antenna: 2
3.120
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
636.900
0.450
90 518.400
0.450
135
342.200
16.430
180 225 270
-269.800
11.370
315
357.800
0.450
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 677.600
0.470
-365.500 181.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 168.150
Antenna: 3
139.860
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
636.900
0.450
90 518.400
0.450
135
342.200
0.450
180
-0.300
0.490
225
181.400
31.950
270
-269.800
211.100
315
357.800
92.150
677.600
6.680
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
149 33-46-58.5 N 116-45-19.1 W 1763.6 23.8
Address: Hwy. 243, 1/4 Mile South of Round Robin Dr.
City: Idyllwild County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
163.700
4.640
90 -147.500 125.100
71.940 146.890
135 180
444.300
26.730
225
932.400
2.120
270
938.800
0.520
315
399.500
0.520
464.900
0.520
FCC 601-C
274 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
149 33-46-58.5 N 116-45-19.1 W 1763.6 23.8
Address: Hwy. 243, 1/4 Mile South of Round Robin Dr.
City: Idyllwild County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
-347.500 125.100
1.770 0.520
135 180
444.300
0.520
225
932.400
0.520
270
938.800
2.170
315
399.500
42.360
464.900 163.700
157.390 47.530
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
150 33-33-55.5 N 116-32-39.3 W 1426.9 27.4
Address: Hwy 74 Near Santa Rosa Rd.
City: Mountain Center County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
290.100
71.940
90 42.600
146.890
135
-143.300
26.730
180
403.200
2.120
225
148.000
0.520
270
144.700
0.520
315
3.100
0.520
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 135.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 4.640
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
290.100
0.520
90 42.600
0.520
135
-143.300
0.520
180
403.200
4.640
225
148.000
71.940
270
144.700
146.890
315
3.100
26.730
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 135.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 2.120
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
290.100
0.520
90 42.600
2.170
135
-143.300
42.360
180
403.200
157.390
225
148.000
47.530
270
144.700
1.770
315
3.100
0.520
135.800
0.520
Location Latitude Longitude
114-31-21.2 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
151
Address: I-95 (40480 Soboba Rd.)
33-57-39.4 N 118.3 45.7
City: Desert Center County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
46.000
135
55.300
1.420
180
62.700
0.580
225 270 315
-200.300
21.040
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -166.600 53.300 -125.300 -82.200 Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.580
Antenna: 2
210.380 200.910 17.910 1.870
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
53.300
0.580
90 46.000
2.590
135
55.300
56.620
180
62.700
283.790
225 270 315
-200.300
0.960
-166.600
0.580
-125.300 -82.200
110.410 5.280
FCC 601-C
275 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
152
Address: 1303 S. Hwy 95
34-17-03.3 N 114-39-17.7 W 418.8 59.7
City: Needles County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
59.900
98.400
90 -10.100
493.170
135
151.600
6.500
180
129.900
1.160
225
-15.400
1.160
270
-225.900
1.160
315
-36.000
1.160
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 94.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.160
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
59.900
1.330
90 -10.100
14.890
135
151.600
183.230
180
129.900
225.420
225
-15.400
23.600
270
-225.900
2.250
315
-36.000
0.580
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 94.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.580
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
-10.100
3.260
135
151.600
0.840
180
129.900
0.580
225
-15.400
0.670
270
-225.900
4.010
315
-36.000
78.160
94.600 59.900
290.400 87.700
Location Latitude Longitude
118-28-08.2 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
153
Address: 641 N. Sepulveda Blvd.
34-04-35.0 N 158.5 17.1
City: Los Angeles County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-70.900
0.420
90 92.700
9.210
135
112.100
139.470
180
149.800
156.490
225
144.100
13.630
270
-226.500
0.920
315
-212.000
0.460
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -91.000
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.420
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
92.700
0.730
135
112.100
0.370
180
149.800
0.330
225
144.100
0.330
270
-226.500
7.320
315
-212.000
110.790
-91.000 -70.900
124.300 10.830
Location Latitude Longitude
117-47-53.9 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
154
Address: Cannon Road
33-50-03.3 N 252.4 43.9
City: Orange County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
-196.400 -3.700
1.010
135 180
208.100
0.640
225
222.700
0.640
270
217.200
0.640
315
175.500
0.640
27.400
1.080
57.200
149.280 52.970
FCC 601-C
276 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
154
Address: Cannon Road
33-50-03.3 N 117-47-53.9 W 252.4 43.9
City: Orange County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
57.200
0.640
90 -196.400 -3.700
0.640 0.640
135 180
208.100
0.640
225
222.700
2.480
270
217.200
175.390
315
175.500
33.420
27.400
0.920
Location Latitude Longitude
117-59-18.2 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
155
Address: 18080 Beach Blvd.
33-41-59.0 N 13.7 21.3
City: Huntington Beach County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
6.600
1.080
90 23.400
14.650
135
13.600
28.630
180
30.500
7.610
225
31.800
0.630
270
33.500
0.480
315
29.700
0.480
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 15.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.520
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
6.600
0.380
90 23.400
0.810
135
13.600
8.600
180
30.500
66.590
225
31.800
136.440
270
33.500
87.060
315
29.700
15.260
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 15.800
Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.310
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
6.600
5.830
90 23.400
0.570
135
13.600
0.480
180
30.500
0.480
225
31.800
0.530
270
33.500
1.460
315
29.700
17.650
15.800
27.250
Location Latitude Longitude
118-14-50.9 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
156
Address: 4441 Cloud Avenue
34-13-38.8 N 468.2 16.8
City: La Crescenta County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
238.000
126.770
225
198.400
10.540
270
66.800
0.580
315
-125.600
0.670
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -582.300
0.940
-521.000 -493.500 152.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
1.830 38.280 264.850
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
238.000
2.590
225
198.400
55.340
270
66.800
283.790
315
-125.600
103.040
-582.300
6.970
-521.000 -493.500 152.300
0.580 0.750 1.360
FCC 601-C
277 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
156
Address: 4441 Cloud Avenue
34-13-38.8 N 118-14-50.9 W 468.2 16.8
City: La Crescenta County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-521.000 -493.500 152.300
241.550 155.960 13.270 0.580
90 135 180
238.000
0.580
225
198.400
0.580
270
66.800
1.560
315
-125.600
29.040
-582.300
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
157
Address: 20996 Marin
33-39-51.0 N 117-39-34.1 W 262.4 6.1
City: Lake Forest County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
117.900
7.710
225
131.200
0.520
270
198.200
0.520
315
109.900
0.520
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -167.300
0.570
-504.700 -300.000 18.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
36.880 243.680 106.370
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
117.900
0.520
225
131.200
0.600
270
198.200
5.350
315
109.900
99.580
-167.300 -504.700 -300.000 18.300
244.450 32.980 1.230 0.520
Location Latitude Longitude
117-53-09.7 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
158
Address: 990 East Alosta Avenue
34-07-40.7 N 193.6 15.2
City: Azusa County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
20.200
9.050
225
91.700
0.900
270
63.600
0.390
315
-664.800
0.390
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -462.500
3.000
-506.900 -155.600 -55.700
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
43.300 184.710 103.870
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
20.200
32.850
225
91.700
172.380
270
63.600
122.030
315
-664.800
12.490
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -462.500
1.110
-506.900 -155.600 -55.700
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.390 0.390 2.170
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
20.200
0.390
225
91.700
0.450
270
63.600
9.260
315
-664.800
99.190
-462.500 -506.900 -155.600 -55.700
189.010 45.340 2.800 0.400
FCC 601-C
278 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
159
Address: 17750 Sherman Way
34-12-02.0 N 118-31-13.3 W 225.9 18.3
City: Encino County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-63.100
47.320
90 15.500
210.380
135
-20.700
200.910
180
-85.200
40.930
225 270 315
-132.700
0.510
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -169.500
3.140
-121.900 -50.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 3.870
Antenna: 2
0.510
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-63.100
0.510
90 15.500
1.870
135
-20.700
28.970
180
-85.200
171.400
225 270 315
-132.700
6.530
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -169.500
0.510
-121.900 -50.400
Transmitting ERP (watts) 233.880
Antenna: 3
66.070
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
15.500
8.600
135
-20.700
0.510
180
-85.200
0.510
225 270 315
-132.700
139.050
-169.500 -63.100 -121.900 -50.400
218.870 78.360 1.470 22.490
Location Latitude Longitude
117-58-35.2 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
160
Address: 1400 Buena Vista Street
34-08-13.0 N 148.1 19.8
City: Duarte County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
-17.500
55.070
180
55.100
7.910
225
69.600
0.540
270
-26.300
0.540
315
-721.200
0.540
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -812.800
0.540
-494.300 -81.700
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
13.530 62.250
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
-17.500
0.540
180
55.100
9.960
225
69.600
59.120
270
-26.300
59.260
315
-721.200
10.510
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -812.800
0.540
-494.300 -81.700
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.540 0.540
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135
-17.500
0.540
180
55.100
0.540
225
69.600
0.540
270
-26.300
0.590
315
-721.200
38.260
-812.800 -494.300 -81.700
252.800 110.350 7.990
FCC 601-C
279 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
161
Address: 15920 Amar Road
34-02-03.9 N 117-56-15.1 W 105.2 16.2
City: City of Industry County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-84.500
21.900
90 135 180
-37.000
15.200
225
-4.100
0.600
270
28.700
0.630
315
10.100
0.600
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -118.000
0.600
-127.500 -101.200
Transmitting ERP (watts) 224.300 Antenna: 2
186.600
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-84.500
0.600
90 135 180
-37.000
29.090
225
-4.100
120.700
270
28.700
45.630
315
10.100
2.540
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -118.000
0.600
-127.500 -101.200
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.600 Antenna: 3
1.060
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
-37.000
0.600
225
-4.100
0.600
270
28.700
6.180
315
10.100
135.180
-118.000 -84.500 -127.500 -101.200
276.000 41.770 3.240 0.600
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
162 33-38-15.2 N 117-14-15.2 W 544.0 23.2
Address: (The Farm) 24240 Bundy Canyon Rd
City: Wildomar County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-27-2011 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
90.900
3.360
90 89.600
54.570
135
132.600
153.810
180
122.400
36.060
225
-27.900
1.730
270
31.700
0.520
315
55.400
0.520
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 86.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.520
Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
90.900
0.520
90 89.600
0.520
135
132.600
1.400
180
122.400
30.690
225
-27.900
153.810
270
31.700
59.840
315
55.400
2.860
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 86.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.520
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
90.900
42.360
90 89.600
5.580
135
132.600
0.520
180
122.400
0.520
225
-27.900
0.520
270
31.700
0.520
315
55.400
1.500
86.600
27.350
FCC 601-C
280 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
163 33-40-49.5 N 117-40-41.6 W 212.1 20.4
Address: (Cooks Bay site)25931 Towne Center Drive
City: Foothill Ranch County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-27-2011 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
93.200
0.900
225
94.600
0.900
270
178.100
0.900
315
83.600
0.900
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -195.100
20.600
-438.500 -298.400 -24.000
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
284.500 334.200 23.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
93.200
0.900
225
94.600
1.710
270
178.100
40.180
315
83.600
374.970
-195.100
236.590 9.420 -438.500 -298.400 -24.000 0.900 0.900
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
164 34-02-39.7 N 117-26-08.6 W 335.9 19.2
Address: (Via Larga site) 11660 Sierra Avenue
City: Fontana County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-27-2011 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
41.800
135
44.600
11.700
180
86.800
1.000
225
136.400
1.000
270
79.100
1.000
315
-29.100
1.990
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -111.600
95.060
-11.700
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
487.000 165.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-11.700
1.590
90 41.800
13.200
135
44.600
269.520
180
86.800
437.110
225
136.400
16.620
270
79.100
1.590
315
-29.100
1.590
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -111.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.590
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
41.800
0.890
135
44.700
0.890
180
86.800
0.890
225
136.400
1.780
270
79.100
85.340
315
-29.100
437.650
-11.600 -11.700
148.300 10.500
Location Latitude Longitude
117-08-29.8 W
Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
165
Address: 30025 Front Street
33-27-58.7 N 481.9 40.5
City: Temecula County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 11-04-2011 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
88.600
0.870
90 54.300
11.070
135
80.600
2.110
180
241.200
3.340
225
256.600
0.640
270
179.100
0.640
315
53.800
0.640
143.500
3.190
FCC 601-C
281 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
165
Address: 30025 Front Street
33-27-58.7 N 117-08-29.8 W 481.9 40.5
City: Temecula County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 11-04-2011 Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
88.600
2.223
90 54.300
0.640
135
80.600
0.640
180
241.200
0.640
225
256.600
0.780
270
179.100
0.640
315
53.800
9.470
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 143.500
Transmitting ERP (watts) 9.140
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
88.600
11.000
90 54.300
0.640
135
80.600
1.560
180
241.200
0.640
225
256.600
0.640
270
179.100
0.640
315
53.800
3.020
143.500
6.160
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
166 33-35-07.6 N 117-36-49.5 W 220.7 13.7
Address: (Tesora site) 29658 Oso Parkway
City: Las Flores County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 02-10-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
91.700
164.980
225
123.000
21.750
270
84.000
1.770
315
77.900
0.400
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -156.400
0.400
-303.900 -228.800 23.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
1.090 12.520 134.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
91.700
1.940
225
123.000
23.850
270
84.000
172.760
315
77.900
125.150
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -156.400
11.950
-303.900 -228.800 23.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
1.040 0.400 0.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
91.700
0.420
225
123.000
0.400
270
84.000
0.400
315
77.900
4.140
-156.400
57.210
-303.900 -228.800 23.300
202.970 65.680 5.100
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
167 34-29-04.0 N 115-28-55.0 W 243.9 68.3 1025110
Address: Cadiz site SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5N, RANGE 14E
City: CADIZ County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
-154.700 89.600
430.530
135 180
119.000
430.530
225
39.000
430.530
270
110.000
430.530
315
69.900
430.530
-79.100 -24.400
430.530 430.530 430.530
FCC 601-C
282 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
168 34-48-42.0 N 115-36-31.0 W 1261.7 30.5
Address: Granite Pass Granite Mountain
City: Baker County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
367.600
135
392.900
113.370
180
279.700
113.370
225
178.300
113.370
270
-159.900
113.370
315
354.500
113.370
244.400 -10.600
113.370 113.370 113.370
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
169 34-43-10.0 N 115-39-18.0 W 1112.5 60.6
Address: Fenner Valley Site 91919 Brown Buttes Rd
City: Twenty-nine Palms County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 4
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
339.900
135
382.800
29.110
180
617.500
1.670
225
494.400
0.670
270
269.200
0.670
315
-136.100
1.430
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -78.700
15.630
78.200
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 5
210.860 271.640
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
78.200
0.670
90 339.900
2.060
135
382.800
49.430
180
617.500
297.850
225
494.400
163.680
270
269.200
8.390
315
-136.100
0.960
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -78.700
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.670
Antenna: 6
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
78.200
1.130
90 339.900
0.670
135
382.800
0.670
180
617.500
1.920
225
494.400
36.640
270
269.200
277.970
315
-136.100
192.310
-78.700
13.000
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
170 34-43-52.0 N 115-52-02.0 W 885.1 59.7
Address: Old Dads Mountain 26420 E. Siberia Rd
City: Amboy County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
134.400
277.970
180
422.400
58.080
225
366.500
1.710
270
207.900
0.680
315
168.100
0.680
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 275.900
3.120
-155.400 -13.100
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
82.040 304.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135
134.400
0.680
180
422.400
36.640
225
366.500
236.590
270
207.900
326.590
315
168.100
118.580
275.900
7.660
-155.400 -13.100
0.680 0.680
FCC 601-C
283 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
171 33-46-29.1 N 117-29-13.2 W 309.8 51.8
Address: Temescal Cyn 23900 Temescal Canyon Rd
City: Corona County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-82.900
31.950
90 135 180 225 270 315
38.300
0.300
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 23.800
3.120
-318.400 -75.100
127.200
-539.400 -551.000 -414.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 24.800
Antenna: 2
118.710 2.260 0.300
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
-82.900
24.970
90 135 180 225 270 315
38.300
38.420
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 23.800
38.430
-318.400 -75.100
2.630
-539.400 -551.000 -414.600
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.300
Antenna: 3
0.300 2.000 21.020
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
-82.500
0.330
90 135 180 225 270 315
38.300
0.770
23.800
0.580
-318.400 -75.100
0.330 1.190
-539.400 -551.000 -414.600
56.820 160.130 80.260
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
172 33-54-07.0 N 116-21-58.8 W 331.6 16.7
Address: Sky Valley 74555 Dillon Rd
City: Desrt Hot Springs County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
214.200
12.650
225
148.900
2.520
270
78.900
0.740
315
-268.900
0.740
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -750.400
2.030
-790.300 -333.100 85.200
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
13.730 62.080 5.040
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
214.200
68.250
225
148.900
62.720
270
78.900
13.910
315
-268.900
2.770
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -750.400
0.820
-790.300 -333.100 85.200
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.820 2.230 15.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
214.200
2.650
225
148.900
29.680
270
78.900
296.830
315
-268.900
283.470
-750.400
25.260
-790.300 -333.100 852.000
2.010 0.820 0.820
FCC 601-C
284 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
173 33-31-00.3 N 117-03-38.5 W 443.2 32.2
Address: (Cerro Site) 34410 Calac Rd
City: Temecula County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
38.300
9.210
225
67.700
0.400
270
72.500
0.400
315
26.300
0.400
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -52.900
0.720
-134.900 -161.100 -184.100
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
13.630 103.390 88.000
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
38.300
60.810
225
67.700
242.100
270
72.500
94.190
315
26.300
6.820
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -52.900
0.770
-134.900 -161.100 -184.100
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.770 0.770 3.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
38.300
0.400
225
67.700
0.400
270
72.500
5.300
315
26.300
65.240
-52.900 -134.900 -161.100 -184.100
121.470 23.150 1.080 0.400
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
174 34-23-33.8 N 117-34-33.4 W 1553.6 24.4
Address: Mountain Top 7770 Hwy 138
City: Phelan County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-06-2012 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
423.200
2.970
90 304.800
30.410
135
473.100
241.550
180 225 270 315
356.700
0.580
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 439.000
0.580
-232.300 -481.000 -274.200
Transmitting ERP (watts) 167.110
Antenna: 2
12.680 1.160
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
423.200
0.580
90 304.800
0.580
135
473.100
2.590
180 225 270 315
356.700
5.280
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 439.000
0.960
-232.300 -481.000 -274.200
Transmitting ERP (watts) 56.620
Antenna: 3
283.790 110.410
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
304.800
0.960
135
473.100
0.580
180 225 270 315
356.700
283.790
439.000 423.200 -232.300 -481.000 -274.200
110.410 5.280 0.580 2.590 56.620
FCC 601-C
285 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
175 33-55-28.8 N 116-25-30.1 W 339.2 22.9
Address: (Long Canyon) 70-875 Dillon Road
City: Desert Hot Springs County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-27-2013 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
145.300
8.790
225
181.400
0.590
270
87.100
0.590
315
-211.300
0.590
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -671.100
0.650
-711.400 -420.900 55.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
42.070 277.970 121.340
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180
145.300
6.080
225
181.400
133.050
270
87.100
271.640
315
-211.300
41.110
Antenna Height AAT (meters) -671.100
3.190
-711.400 -420.900 55.300
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.590 0.590 0.590
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135 180
145.300
0.590
225
181.400
0.590
270
87.100
2.210
315
-211.300
76.560
-671.100 -711.400 -420.900 55.300
297.850 74.820 5.420 0.590
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
176 34-10-26.0 N 116-43-18.4 W 2529.8 27.7 1271970
Address: (Barton Flats site) 49150 Hwy 38
City: Angelus Oaks County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90
769.400
135
784.300
2.860
180
679.600
0.640
225 270 315
245.200
5.580
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 396.800
90.600
653.100 -137.600 470.000
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.520
Antenna: 2
255.260 59.800 0.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
653.100
0.550
90 769.400
0.520
135
784.300
0.520
180
679.600
7.710
225 270 315
245.200
44.360
396.800
3.520
-137.600 470.000
119.390 243.770
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
177 34-37-35.2 N 114-38-17.6 W 614.2 59.7
Address: (Havasu Pass site) On Hwy 95
City: Needles County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
241.200
1.230
90 161.400
9.960
135
-85.300
14.400
180
160.600
2.970
225
203.000
0.240
270
128.100
0.100
315
49.800
0.100
246.500
0.160
FCC 601-C
286 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
177 34-37-35.2 N 114-38-17.6 W 614.2 59.7
Address: (Havasu Pass site) On Hwy 95
City: Needles County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
241.200
0.130
90 161.400
0.790
135
-85.300
15.430
180
160.600
57.330
225
203.000
17.310
270
128.100
0.640
315
49.800
0.170
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 246.500
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.110
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
241.200
17.850
90 161.400
1.660
135
-85.300
0.240
180
160.600
0.110
225
203.000
0.110
270
128.100
0.470
315
49.800
6.200
246.500
31.760
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
178 33-29-16.5 N 117-34-55.1 W 269.1 12.2
Address: (Portada Village site) 1498 1/2 Avenida Talega City: San Clemente County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
134.200
68.320
180
201.000
4.110
225
244.300
0.380
270
200.400
0.380
315
152.100
0.380
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 98.600
3.420
-121.500 -96.900
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 2
58.080 192.310
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135
134.200
10.810
180
201.000
110.660
225
244.300
175.390
270
200.400
30.480
315
152.100
1.390
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 98.600
0.380
-121.500 -96.900
Transmitting ERP (watts)
Antenna: 3
0.380 0.380
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90 135
134.200
0.380
180
201.000
0.380
225
244.300
21.090
270
200.400
149.280
315
152.100
142.560
98.600
17.140
-121.500 -96.900
0.400 0.380
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
179 35-21-45.8 N 117-38-27.1 W 1260.9 78.0 1200992
Address: (Johannesburg) 36753 Randsburg Loop
City: Johannesburg County: KERN State: CA Construction Deadline: 08-14-2014 Antenna: 1
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45 90
331.500
135
397.200
0.740
180
350.400
0.740
225
146.700
0.740
270
538.800
2.380
315
431.600
84.380
348.100 240.400
354.700 104.950 5.940
FCC 601-C
287 of 642
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No.
179 35-21-45.8 N 117-38-27.1 W 1260.9 78.0 1200992
Address: (Johannesburg) 36753 Randsburg Loop
City: Johannesburg County: KERN State: CA Construction Deadline: 08-14-2014 Antenna: 2
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north) 0 45
240.400
0.880
90 331.500
28.460
135
397.200
301.410
180
350.400
202.420
225
146.700
16.350
270
538.800
1.290
315
431.600
0.740
Antenna Height AAT (meters) 348.100
Transmitting ERP (watts) 0.740
Antenna: 3
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
0 45
240.400
1.290
90 331.500
0.740
135
397.200
0.740
180
350.400
0.880
225
146.700
28.460
270
538.800
301.410
315
431.600
202.420
348.100
16.350
Control Points:
Control Pt. No. 5
Address: 500 W. Dove Road
City: Southlake County: TARRANT State: TX Telephone Number: (800)264-6620 Waivers/Conditions:
Grant of the request to update licensee name is conditioned on it not reflecting an assignment or transfer of control (see Rule
1.948); if an assignment or transfer occurred without proper notification or FCC approval, the grant is void and the station is licensed under the prior name.
License renewal granted on a conditional basis, subject to the outcome of FCC proceeding WT Docket No. 10-112 (see FCC 10-86, paras. 113 and 126).
FCC 601-C
288 of 642
Radio Frequency – Electromagnetic Energy
(RF-EME) Compliance Report
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
Glendale, California 91201
Los Angeles County
34.174022; -118.282517 NAD83
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Prepared for:
Verizon Small Cell
c/o ExteNet, LLC
3030 Warrenville Road, Suite 340
Lisle, Illinois 60532
Prepared by:
289 of 642
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................... 2
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND ANTENNA INVENTORY .................................................................. 3
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND MODELING PROCEDURE .............................................. 4
3.0 MITIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS ................................................................................ 5
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................. 6
5.0 LIMITATIONS......................................................................................................................... 6
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A CERTIFICATIONS
APPENDIX B FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX C RADIO FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SAFETY / SIGNAGE PLANS EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 1 290 of 642
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by ExteNet to to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for ExteNet site SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C located in Glendale, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from the proposed wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix B, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields.
Modeling results included in this report are based on a site node list dated March 19, 2021 as provided to EBI Consulting. Subsequent changes to the drawings or site design may yield changes in the MPE levels or FCC Compliance recommendations.
The nearest adjacent building is located at a distance of at least 46 feet from the proposed installation.
Since the exact height of the adjacent structure is unknown, calculations were performed at the Maximum Antenna Face Value at a horizontal distance of 46 feet. All adjacent buildings are assumed to be accessible to the general public, including all persons not fully aware of RF hazards and who are not trained in RF safety procedures
Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary
Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
Occupational
Limit
Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
General
% of FCC General
Public/Uncontrolled
Exposure Limit
% of FCC
Occupational/Controlled
Exposure Limit
Power Density
(mW/cm2)
Location
Public Limit
Proposed Verizon Antennas
Maximum
Antenna
Face 198.0600 39.6120 1.9806 N/A 4
Value
Nearest
Walking
Surface
Ground
Level
0.6875
0.1000
0.1375
0.0200
0.0069
0.0010
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
These results are calculated based on max power assumptions for this site. The proposed antennas will contribute the majority to these emissions. Workers accessing any equipment on the pole should follow all safety procedures outlined by the carrier and property owner.
Statement of Compliance
Signage recommendations are presented in Section 3.0 to bring the site into compliance with the FCC Rules and Regulations.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 2 291 of 642
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND ANTENNA INVENTORY
This project involves the installation of three proposed active wireless telecommunication antennas on a pole in Glendale, California. This site is located in the right of way.
The antennas are to be mounted on a pole and operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights mentioned below.
1 2
3 Verizon
Verizon
Verizon
ERICSSON
ERICSSON
ERICSSON
SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW 28000
SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW 28000
SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW 28000
0 1.3
1.3 1.3
0.6 0.6
0.6 26.14
26.14 26.14
250.8
250.8
250.8
411.3
411.3
411.3
120
240
Antenna Radiation
Centerline
Z-Height
Ground ID Carrier X Y
1 2
3 Verizon
Verizon
Verizon
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.4
0.4 0.4
26 26
26 25.4
25.4 25.4
*Z-Height represents the distance measured from the bottom of the antenna.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 3 292 of 642
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND MODELING PROCEDURE
EBI has performed theoretical modeling using Roofmaster™ software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site antenna face, ground level and relevent adjacent structures-level resulting from the operation of the antennas. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” (OET-65), Roofmaster™ calculates predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. Roofmaster™ models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially-averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit.
For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by ExteNet and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC’s occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65.
The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by ExteNet and information gathered from other sources. The parameters used for modeling are summarized in Section 1.0.
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 4 293 of 642
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
3.0 MITIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS
EBI’s modeling indicates that there are no areas in front of the Verizon antennas that exceed the FCC standards for occupational or general public exposure at ground level or on any adjacent structure observed within 50 feet of this site.
To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.
Access to this site is accomplished by approaching the pole at ground level. Access to the pole is gained via a lift or climbing with fall protection and therefore antennas are not considered to be accessible to the general public.
Implementation of recommended signage in this report will bring this site into compliance with the FCC’s rules and regulations.
Attachment 1: Signage Table
Posting
Instructions Sign Description Required Signage / Mitigation Yellow Caution Sign
Used to alert individuals that they are
entering an area where the power density
emitted from transmitting antenna(s) may
exceed the FCC’s maximum permissible
exposure limit for the occupational
population.
Securely post 2 signs on
opposite sides of the
pole 3 feet below the
antennas (22.4 feet
2 signs posted below the antennas.
above ground level).
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 5 294 of 642
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency – Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report for the proposed ExteNet site to be located on a pole in Glendale, California.
EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from the proposed antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and to ensure that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements.
Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary
Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
% of FCC General
Public/Uncontrolled
Exposure Limit
% of FCC
Occupational/Controlled
Exposure Limit
Power Density
(mW/cm2)
Location
Occupational General Public
Limit Limit
Proposed Verizon Antennas
Maximum
Antenna
Face 198.0600 39.6120 1.9806 N/A 4
Value
Nearest
Walking
Surface
Ground
Level
0.6875
0.1000
0.1375
0.0200
0.0069
0.0010
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Workers should be informed about the presence and locations of antennas and their associated fields.
Recommended control measures are outlined in Section 3.0.
To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.
Implementation of the signage recommended in this report will bring this site into compliance with the FCC’s rules and regulations.
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the use of ExteNet. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 6 295 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
Appendix A
Certifications
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 296 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
Preparer Certification
I, Jonathan Walz, state that:
§
§
§
I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified “occupational” under the FCC regulations.
I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. §
§
I have been trained on RF-EME modeling using Roofmaster™ modeling software.
I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 297 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
Reviewed and Approved by:
sealed 30dec2022
Michael McGuire
Electrical Engineer
[email protected]
Note that EBI’s scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency – Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering and design of the building and related structures, as well as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the structural integrity of the building, are specifically excluded from EBI’s scope of work.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 298 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
Appendix B
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Requirements
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 299 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP.
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area.
Table 1 and Figure 1 (below), which are included within the FCC’s OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are “time-averaged” limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures.
The FCC’s MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of 1 mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range.
Equipment operating in the 700 MHz frequency range has an established occupational MPE of 2.33 (mW/cm2) and a general public MPE of 0.47 mW/cm2, equipment operating in the 850 MHz frequency range the occupational MPE is 2.83 mW/cm2 and the general public MPE is 0.57 mW/cm2, and equipment operating in the 1900 and 2100 MHz frequency range the occupational MPE is 5 mW/cm2 and general public MPE is 1 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 300 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
Table 1: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
(A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Frequency Range
(MHz)
Electric Field
Strength (E)
Magnetic Field
Strength (H)
Averaging Time
[E]2, [H]2, or S Power Density (S)
(mW/cm2)
(V/m)
614
1842/f
61.4 --
(A/m)
1.63 4.89/f
0.163
--
(minutes)
0.3-3.0
3.0-30
30-300
300-I,500
1,500-100,000
(100)*
(900/f2)*
1.0 f/300
5 6
6 6
6 -- -- 6
(B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency Range
(MHz)
Electric Field
Strength (E)
Magnetic Field
Strength (H)
Averaging Time
[E]2, [H]2, or S Power Density (S)
(mW/cm2)
(V/m)
614
824/f
27.5 --
(A/m)
1.63 2.19/f
0.073
--
(minutes)
0.3-1.34
1.34-30
30-300
300-1,500
1,500-100,000
f = Frequency in (MHz)
(100)*
(180/f2)*
0.2 f/1,500
1.0 30
30 30
30 -- -- 30
* Plane-wave equivalent power density
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 301 of 642
Small Cell Noise Study
EBI Project No. 6222007072
Site No. CA002_GLENDALE_137
Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd, Glendale, California
Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below:
Approximate
Frequency
5,000 - 80,000 MHz
2,600 MHz
Occupational
MPE Personal Wireless Service Public MPE
Microwave (Point-to-Point)
Broadband Radio (BRS)
Wireless Communication (WCS)
Advanced Wireless (AWS)
Personal Communication (PCS)
Cellular Telephone
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR)
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
Most Restrictive Frequency Range
5.00 mW/cm2
5.00 mW/cm2
5.00 mW/cm2
5.00 mW/cm2
5.00 mW/cm2
2.90 mW/cm2
2.85 mW/cm2
2.33 mW/cm2
1.00 mW/cm2
1.00 mW/cm2
1.00 mW/cm2
1.00 mW/cm2
1.00 mW/cm2
1.00 mW/cm2
0.58 mW/cm2
0.57 mW/cm2
0.47 mW/cm2
0.20 mW/cm2
2,300 MHz
2,100 MHz
1,950 MHz
870 MHz
855 MHz
700 MHz
30-300 MHz
MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health.
Personal Communication Services (PCS) facilities operate within a frequency range of 1850-1990 MHz.
Facilities typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) facilities operate within a frequency range of 2155-2180 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets); and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units. Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCS/AWS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.
This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas.
FCC Compliance Requirement
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards.
EBI Consulting · 21 B Street · Burlington, MA 01803 · 1.800.786.2346 302 of 642
Al ternati ve Site Anal ysi s
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
Front of 1544 W. Kenneth Rd., Glendale, CA91201
February 2, 2023
Site Location and Vicinity Map
North
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
303 of 642
Proposed Site
• The proposed site location will
adequately fulfill the RF coverage
objectives and will eliminate or
minimize gaps in pre-existing
coverage.
•
•
Provides coverage along the roadway
and adjacent areas.
There are no tall trees or structures in
the immediate vicinity of this site
which would decrease the RF
coverage.
Aerial View
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
304 of 642
Alternative 1
•
•
Alternative 1 is on the wooden
utility pole which GWP has advised
against.
Alternative 1 is located at an
intersection and would require more
extensive traffic coordination than the
proposed site.
• Alternative 1 has tree in the
immediate vicinity which would
decrease the RF coverage.
Aerial View
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
305 of 642
Alternative 2
•
•
Alternative 2 is on the wooden
utility pole which GWP has advised
against.
Alternative 2 is located at an
intersection and would require more
extensive traffic coordination than the
proposed site.
• Alternative 2 has tree in the
immediate vicinity which would
decrease the RF coverage.
Aerial View
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
306 of 642
Alternative 3
•
•
Alternative 3 is farther away from the
coverage objective.
Alternative 3 is located close to
the driveway which is not
recommended.
•
•
Alternative 3 is not in a location that
will meet coverage objectives.
Aerial View
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
307 of 642
Glendale
Existing 4G Sites With Proposed 5G Locations
RSRP Levels
In Building Coverage
In Transit Coverage
Outdoor Coverage
0 1 2
Scale in miles N
308 of 642
RSRP Levels
In Building Coverage
In Transit Coverage
Outdoor Coverage
0 400 800
Scale in feet
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237B
Antenna Height: 26.42 ft AGL
309 of 642
SW-CA-GLENDA00237CFO 1544 W Kenneth
Rd
Glendale, CA
91201
Facing
W
Facing
N
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
Disclaimer: This photo simulation is an artist’s depiction of a future installation. The actual construction may vary slightly in size, layout, color and texture from this simulation.
310 of 642
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
PROPOSE
D
EXISTIN
G FO 1544 W Kenneth
Rd
Glendale, CA
91201
Facing
North
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld
Solutions Disclaimer: This photo simulation is an artist’s depiction of a future installation. The actual construction may vary slightly in size, layout, color and texture from this simulation.
311 of 642
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
PROPOS
ED
EXISTIN
G
FO 1544 W Kenneth
Rd
Glendale, CA Facing 91201
West
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld
Solutions Disclaimer: This photo simulation is an artist’s depiction of a future installation. The actual construction may vary slightly in size, layout, color and texture from this simulation.
312 of 642
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND
INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE
FOLLOWING CODES
AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING
IN THESE
PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.
1. GLENDALE BUILDING & SAFETY CODE, 2019 - ORDINANCE
5892
2. GLENDALE BUILDING & SAFETY CODE, 2019 - INSERT
VERSION
3. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
IF USING 11" X 17" PLOT. DRAWINGS WILL BE HALF
SCALE
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: SW-CA-GLN5GG02- DRAWING
VZW
SITE NAME:
CA002_GLENDALE_137
SITE NUMBER: SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS &
AUTHORIZE THE
SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN.
ALL DOCUMENTS
ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSE CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS.
4. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL
5. 2019 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE CODE
6. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
7. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
8. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
9. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
10. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING
STANDARDS CODE
11. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
12. GO95/GO128
APPROVED
BY:
INITIALS: DATE:
RF ENGINEER:
OPERATIONS:
SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
ZONING MANAGER:
LEASING VENDOR:
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:
A/E MANAGER:
ADA COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN
HABITATION. AND IS EXEMPTED FROM ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE SECTION
11B-203.5 CODE
COMPLIANCE
THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION.
A
TECHNICIAN WILL VISIT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE
MAINTENANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY
SIGNIFICANT
DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT ON DRAINAGE; NO SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE,
POTABLE WATER, OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND NO COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE IS NEEDED.
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting PROPERTY OWNER:
UTILITY:
Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
| &
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
APPROVAL
S
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC GENERAL
NOTES
THE PROJECT CONSIST OF THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF ANTENNAS AND
ASSOCIATED
EQUIPMENT FOR EXTENET'S PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE (PCS) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF
PARTICIPANTS
UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE YOU DIG
IN CALIFORNIA (SOUTH). CALL DIG
ALERT
ꢁ REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING 25'-0" AGL ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE &
FOUNDATION WITH
NEW 25'-0" AGL ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137) & FOUNDATION 5'-0" EAST
OF ORIGINAL LOCATION.
POLE ID#: SL_6164
SITE ADDRESS: FRONT OF 1544 W
KENNETH RD.
GLENDALE, CA 91201
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 OR
www.digalert.org
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
NEW 3'-6" X 8'-0" REINFORCED FOUNDATION 5'-0" EAST OF ORIGINAL LOCATION. (3) 16.2" X 8.1" X 6.1" PANEL ANTENNAS WITH INTEGRATED RRU'S WITHIN CONCEALMENT SHROUD.
11.50" X 8.0" X 3.313" METER CAN WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE.
10.43" X 9.38" X 5.06" AC DISCONNECT/LOAD CENTER WITH INTEGRATED SURGE
PROTECTION WITHIN
NEW ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE.
CALIFORNIA STATUTE REQUIRES MINIMUM OF
2 WORKING DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU
EXCAVATE
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX FOR FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE
PERMIT).
(2) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR POWER.
PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT EMIT ANY SOUND.
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
PROPERTY OWNER:
POLE OWNER:
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
GLENDALE WATER AND
POWER
POWER
PROVIDER:
GLENDALE WATER AND
POWER
141 N. GLENDALE AVE.
GLENDALE, CA 91206 CONTACT: SENIOR ELECTRICAL
ENGINEER
PHONE: (818) 548-3924
EMAIL: TBD
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
T-1
T-2
T-3
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
D-1
D-2
E-1
E-2
E-3
E-4
G-1
N1
TITLE SHEET APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, CA LLC.
300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE
400
BURBANK, CA 91502
GENERAL NOTES AND 1-A CERTIFICATION LETTER (COMPLETED
BY OTHERS)
EXISTING SITE POLE
PHOTOS LATITUDE (NAD
83):
34° 10' 26.48" N
34.174022°
OVERALL SITE
PLAN EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23 ENLARGED SITE
LONGITUDE (NAD 83): PLAN SITE NUMBER
LONGITUDE / LATITUDE
TYPE:
118° 16' 57.06" W
-118.282517°
EXISTING AND NEW SOUTH
ELEVATIONS
EXISTING AND NEW EAST
ELEVATIONS
EQUIPMENT DETAILS
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C NAVD 83
GROUND ELEVATION (NAVD 88):
±624'-6" EQUIPMENT DETAILS SITE NAME
ADJACENT APN#:
JURISDICTION:
CURRENT
ZONING:
NEW USE:
5622-027-018 UTILITY SITE
PLAN
SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM & PANEL
SCHEDULE
CONDUIT PLACEMENT DETAILS
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 CITY OF GLENDALE
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY CONDUIT PLACEMENT DETAILS HUB UNMANNED LOCATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUNDING DIAGRAM, NOTES AND DETAILS
NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
ASSEMBLY - ELEVATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
ASSEMBLY - ELEVATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
ASSEMBLY - ELEVATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
LIGHT ARM CONNECTION DETAILS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
FOUNDATION DETAILS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
SITE
INFORMATION GLENDALE, CA
S1 91201
PROJECT MANAGER S2
TELEWORLD SOLUTIONS
43130 AMBERWOOD PLAZA, SUITE
210
CHANTILLY, VA 20152
CONTACT: RYAN GROSS
OSP
ENGINEER
TBD
CONTACT:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
S3 SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS N N S5
PHONE: (224) 293-6355
EMAIL:
[email protected]
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
S6
SAC/ZONING/PERMITTING TCP-1
TELEWORLD SOLUTIONS
43130 AMBERWOOD PLAZA, SUITE 210
CHANTILLY, VA 20152
CONTACT: ALEXANDER NOVAK
PHONE: (682) 351-3335
EMAIL:
[email protected]
SENIOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
EXTENET SYSTEMS CA, LLC.
300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE
400
BURBANK, CA 91502
CONTACT: MARCOS A. CASTRO
PHONE: (760) 625-5476
EMAIL: [email protected]
1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
MAP DATA @ 2023 GOOGLEMAP DATA @ 2023 GOOGLE VICINITY
MAP
LOCAL
MAP SHEET NAME DIRECTIONS FROM 300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE 400, BURBANK, CA 91502.
EXTENET OFFICE:
RF ENGINEER
TBD
CONTACT:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
SENIOR TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER
EXTENET SYSTEMS CA, LLC.
300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE 400
BURBANK, CA 91502
CONTACT: EDWARD MARTINEZ
PHONE: (818) 419-2147
EMAIL: [email protected]
HEAD NORTHEAST ON E MAGNOLIA BLVD TOWARD N GLENOAKS BLVD, TURN RIGHT ONTO N GLENOAKS BLVD, TURN LEFT ONTO ALLEN AVE, TURN RIGHT ONTO W KENNETH RD, DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT. SHEET
INDEX TITLE SHEET
ARRIVE AT 1544 W KENNETH RD., GLENDALE, CA
91201
SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON
THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT T-1
TEAM
DRIVING
DIRECTIONS
DO NOT SCALE
DRAWINGS
313 of 642
GENERAL NOTES:
1. THESE NOTES SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACT
AND CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS. 2. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR
NECESSARY TO COMPLETE
ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS AND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITES(S) AND BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS, AND CONFIRM THAT THE WORK MAY BE
ACCOMPLISHED
PER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
IMPLEMENTATION
ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PRIOR TO BID SUBMITTAL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED ON ANY WORK NOT
CLEARLY DEFINED OR
IDENTIFIED IN THE CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE STARTING ANY WORK. 5. ALL WORK PREFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
APPLICABLE CODES,
REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES, INCLUDING APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. IF THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONTRACT AND
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPLICABLE CODES OR REGULATIONS, REVIEW AND RESOLVE THE CONFLICT WITH
DIRECTION FROM
THE IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS,
TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES,
AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATION OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT
INCLUDING CONTACT
AND COORDINATION WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER AND WITH THE AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY
OUTSIDE POLE OR PROPERTY OWNER.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS,
INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO PAVING, CURBS, VEGETATION, GALVANIZED SURFACE OR OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS AND
UPON COMPLETION
OF THE WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF EXTENET.
9. CONTRACTOR IS TO KEEP THE GENERAL AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT,
DEBRIS, RUBBISH, AND
REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN 10. PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE SCALED UNLESS OTHERWISE CONDITION DAILY. NOTED. RELY ONLY ON ANNOTATED DIMENSIONS AND REQUEST INFORMATION IF ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS ARE 11. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND OTHER AGENCY'S FACILITIES WERE OBTAINED BY A REQUIRED. SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. OTHER FACILITIES MAY EXIST. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO START OF
CONSTRUCTION AND
USE EXTREME CARE AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO THESE FACILITIES.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR THE PROTECTION OF UTILITIES OR OTHER AGENCY'S FACILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK, WHETHER THEY ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR NOT.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (800) 227- 2600, AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY EXCAVATION. 13. THE EXISTING STREET LIGHT FACILITIES (PULL BOXES, STREET LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, ETC.) SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE AND BE ACCESSIBLE TO GWP PERSONNEL AT ALL TIMES. 14. ANY WORK TO BE DONE BY GLENDALE WATER & POWER, AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL
BE COORDINATED
WITH GWP STREET LIGHT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN ADVANCE AT THE PROJECT'S EXPENSE.
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
SITE NAME
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 HUB
LOCATION
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
1544 W KENNETH FRONT OF
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SHEET NAME
GENERAL NOTES AND
1-A
CERTIFICATION
LETTERSHEET COMPLETED BY OTHERS/ FOR NUMBER
REFERENCE ONLY T-2
GENERAL
NOTES
1 1-A CERTIFICATION
LETTER
2 314 of 642
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
| &
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23
SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
SITE NAME
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 HUB
LOCATION
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
1544 W KENNETH FRONT OF
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SHEET NAME
EXISTING SITE
POLE
PHOTOS
SHEET NUMBER
T-3
EXISTING SITE POLE LOCATION LOOKING
NORTH 1 EXISTING SITE POLE LOCATION LOOKING WEST 2
315 of 642
LEGEND:
ELECTRIC
NOTE:
THE EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION WILL BE
COMPLETELY REMOVED
E
F FIBER
OVERHEAD
FIBER
STREET LIGHT
SEWER
EXISTING
BUILDING
GAS
WATER EXISTING
BUILDING TELCO
EXISTING
BUILDING
STORM DRAIN
EXISTING
BUILDING EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
EXISTING | | |
| &
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.) Engineering with Precision, Pace &
EXISTING Passion.
BUILDING EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING WOODEN
POLE (TYP.)
EXISTING
FIRE
HYDRANT
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
EXISTING
BUILDING JOB#: EXISTING T2100237 CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
EXISTING COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP,
LLC ©
CURB (TYP.)
EXISTING
GUTTER
(TYP.)
EXISTING TREE
(TYP.) DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
EXISTING
BUILDING EXISTING
BUILDING
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
EXISTING
BUILDING 0
1 2
3 4
09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
EXISTING
BUILDING
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP EXISTING
BUILDING EXISTING
BUILDING EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
EXISTING 06/27/23
BUILDING SITE NUMBER EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL
STREET LIGHT POLE (ID#
SL_6164)
AND FOUNDATION TO BE
REMOVED
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C EXISTING
BUILDING NEW EXTENET
A-2 SITE LOCATION
EXISTING -
BUILDING SITE NAME
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-
6" X
8'-0" REINFORCED
FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
- CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 S6
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137)
HUB
- FOUNDATION, AND NEW LOCATION
EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL
LOCATION (BY OTHERS)
S1-S3
EXISTING
BUILDING
GLENDALE, CA
91201
EXISTING
BUILDING
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201 EXISTING
BUILDING SHEET NAME
EXISTING
BUILDING OVERALL SITE
EXISTING PLAN
BUILDING
N
SHEET NUMBER
A-1
OVERALL SITE
PLAN
24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
20' 1 20'
10' 0"
316 of 642
LEGEND:
ELECTRIC
NOTE:
THE EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION WILL
BE COMPLETELY REMOVED
E
F FIBER
OVERHEAD
FIBER
STREET LIGHT
SEWER
NOTE:
LOCATION OF CONDUIT(S), AND
PULL
BOX(ES) TO BE DETERMINED BY GWP
INSPECTOR DURING
EXISTING OVER
HEAD
STREET LIGHT
POWER
(TYP.)
GAS PRE-CONSTRUCTION WATER EXISTING MEETING
CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
EXISTING
TELCO BUILDING NOTE:
CONDUIT SHALL BE RGC OR SCH80
PVC
STORM DRAIN EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.) EXISTING TREE
(TYP.)
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE
EXISTING
STREET LIGHT PULL BOXES AS NEEDED.
EXISTING
GUTTER
(TYP.) NOTES: EXISTING
CURB (TYP.) 1. IF DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLAN DO NOT
SCALE
CORRECTLY, CHECK FOR REDUCTION OR
ENLARGEMENT FROM ORIGINAL PLANS.
2. UTILITY DESIGN AND RUNS ARE
PRELIMINARY.
PENDING FINAL DESIGN FROM UTILITY
PROVIDERS.
3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SUB STRUCTURE
LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION
CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ASPHALT,
CURBS, ADA
RAMPS, PARKWAYS AND SIDEWALKS TO ORIGINAL
STATE PER CITY STANDARDS.
EXISTING STAND
ALONE
UTILITY WOODEN
POLE
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
| &
Engineering with Precision, Pace & EXTENET TO EXCAVATE Passion. &
INSTALL (1) 17" X 30" X
24"
PULL BOX FOR POWER
5 E-3 6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119 4. ALL CONDUCTORS/WIRES & CONDUIT,
SHALL BE
INSTALLED IN A NEAT AND TIDY FASHION.
ALL
EXCESS WIRE SLACK IS TO BE REMOVED
AND
HIDDEN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
5. ALL NEWLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE
PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING POLE, AND OR
SURROUNDINGS UNLESS PROHIBITED
BY
MANUFACTURER.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
EXISTING
BUILDING
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
NOTE: 0
1 2
3 4
09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
-
A-4 THE LOCATIONS AND EXISTENCE OF
UNDERGROUND PIPES, STRUCTURES OR ANY
CONDUITS
SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTAINED BY A
SEARCH
OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. THERE MAY BE
EXISTING
UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THIS
PLAN.
THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT
THE
UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER
LINES NOT
SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX
FOR
FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE
PERMIT)
- 6
E-3
EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED: EXISTING 06/27/23
BUILDING
A-3
SITE NUMBER
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL
STREET LIGHT POLE ID# SL_6164
AND FOUNDATION TO BE
REMOVED
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137)
SITE NAME
- FOUNDATION, AND NEW
EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL
LOCATION (BY OTHERS)
S1-S3 CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 EXTENET TO PLACE NEW PANEL
ANTENNAS AND SHROUD ON
NEW
ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE
3, 4
D-1 HUB
LOCATION
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-
6" X
8'-0" REINFORCED
FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
GLENDALE, CA
91201
-
S6
5 EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
E-3 INSTALL (1) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR
POWER
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
1544 W KENNETH FRONT OF
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
EXISTING
BUILDING
SHEET NAME
EXISTING
BUILDING ENLARGED SITE
PLAN EXISTING
BUILDING N
SHEET NUMBER
A-2
ENLARGED SITE
PLAN
24"x36" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-
0"
11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-
0"
1 8'
8' 6' 4' 2'
0"
317 of 642
NOTE: NOTE:
TOWER DESIGN HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY OTHERS.
SEE SHEETS S1-S3.
AN ANALYSIS OF THE TOWER OR
STRUCTURE HAS
BEEN PERFORMED BY NB+C ENGINEERING
SERVICES DATED 12/19/2022. THE LOCATION
AND
MOUNTING SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL
ANALYSIS
SHALL SUPERSEDE THESE DRAWINGS.
NOTE:
TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN HAS
BEEN
COMPLETED BY OTHERS. SEE
SHEET S6.
FUTURE CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA WITH
INTEGRATED RRUS TO BE
INSTALLED
(TOTAL OF 3)
3 D-1
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW
CONCEALMENT
SHROUD MOUNTED ONTO NEW
ROUND
METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
4 D-1
TOP OF NEW CONCEALMENT
SHROUD
±28'-0" EXISTING OVERHEAD STREET
LIGHT
POWER TO BE REMOVED AND
REROUTED UNDERGROUND
PAINT SHROUD TO MATCH
THE
STREET LIGHT COLOR
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER OF NEW PANEL
ANTENNAS
±26'-11 1/2"
| | |
| &
TOP OF EXISTING
LUMINAIRE
±26'-5" AGL
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV O/H 89119 TOP OF EXISTING
POLE
±25'-0" AGL
TOP OF NEW METAL
POLE
±25'-0"
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
EXISTING
LUMINAIRE
TO BE REMOVED
NEW CABLE COVER TO BE
INSTALLED DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
NEW MAST ARM MOUNT
℄
±22'-0" N O T
IC E NEW MAST ARM AND
LUMINAIRE
TO MATCH EXISTING MAST
ARM
AND LUMINAIRE (BY OTHERS)
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
- TOP OF NEW RF
SIGNAGE
±21'-6"
S5 0
1 2
3 4
09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
2 EXTENET TO PLACE NEW RF
SIGNAGE MOUNTED ON NEW
POLE
D-1
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL
STREET
LIGHT POLE (ID# SL_6164) TO BE
REMOVED
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137), - FOUNDATION, AND NEW
EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL
LOCATION (BY OTHERS)
S1-S3
EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23 NEW AC DISCONNECT/LOAD
CENTER
WITH INTEGRATED SURGE
PROTECTION
TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN NEW
ROUND
METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
5 D-1 SITE NUMBER BOTTOM OF RELOCATED
SIGN
±7'-0" SW-CA-GLENDA00237C NEW METER CAN TO BE NEW DISCONNECT/LOAD INSTALLED CENTER ℄
±6'-0"
WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT
POLE. GWP TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUM OF
60A SERVICE AND SERVICE METER
1 D-2
NEW METER FACE SITE NAME
℄
±4'-6" CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 1" RGC POWER
CONDUIT
FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" FOR GLENDALE
STREET LIGHT POWER FEED
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 HUB
EXISTING LOCATION
DIRT/GRASS
EXISTING
CURB EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS EXISTING
GRADE CURB
±0'-0"
TOP OF CONCRETE
FOUNDATION
±0'-0"
GLENDALE, CA
91201
FINISHED GRADE
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
(1) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX
FOR
POWER
EXTENET TO REMOVE
EXISTING
FOUNDATION
E-3 CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±45'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
PULL BOX TO PULL BOX AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36
1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 2" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"
SHEET NAME EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-6"
X
8'-0" REINFORCED
FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
-
3'-6" EXISTING AND
NEW
SOUTH
ELEVATIONS
S6
SHEET NUMBER
A-3
EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION (LOOKING
NORTH)
24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-
0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-
0"
1 NEW SOUTH ELEVATION (LOOKING
NORTH)
24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-
0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-
0"
2 2'
2' 1' 0" 2' 2' 1' 0"
318 of 642
NOTE: NOTE:
TOWER DESIGN HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY OTHERS.
SEE SHEETS S1-S3.
AN ANALYSIS OF THE TOWER OR
STRUCTURE HAS
BEEN PERFORMED BY NB+C ENGINEERING
SERVICES DATED 12/19/2022. THE LOCATION
AND
MOUNTING SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL
ANALYSIS
SHALL SUPERSEDE THESE DRAWINGS.
NOTE:
TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN HAS
BEEN
COMPLETED BY OTHERS. SEE
SHEET S6.
FUTURE CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA WITH
INTEGRATED RRUS TO BE
INSTALLED
(TOTAL OF 3)
3 D-1
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW
CONCEALMENT
SHROUD MOUNTED ONTO NEW
ROUND
METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
4 TOP OF NEW CONCEALMENT
SHROUD
±28'-0" PAINT SHROUD TO MATCH
THE
STREET LIGHT COLOR
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER OF NEW PANEL
ANTENNAS
±26'-11 1/2"
| | |
| &
TOP OF EXISTING
LUMINAIRE
±26'-5" AGL
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119 TOP OF EXISTING
POLE
±25'-0" AGL
TOP OF NEW METAL
POLE
±25'-0"
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
EXISTING
LUMINAIRE
TO BE REMOVED
NEW CABLE COVER TO BE
INSTALLED DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
NEW MAST ARM MOUNT
℄
±22'-0" INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
NEW MAST ARM AND
LUMINAIRE
TO MATCH EXISTING MAST
ARM
AND LUMINAIRE (BY OTHERS)
- TOP OF NEW RF
SIGNAGE
±21'-6"
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
S5
2 EXTENET TO PLACE NEW RF
SIGNAGE MOUNTED ON NEW
POLE
D-1
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL
STREET
LIGHT POLE (ID# SL_6164) TO BE
REMOVED
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137), - FOUNDATION, AND NEW
EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL
LOCATION (BY OTHERS)
NEW AC DISCONNECT/LOAD
CENTER
WITH INTEGRATED SURGE
PROTECTION
TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN NEW
ROUND
METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
5 EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23
SITE NUMBER BOTTOM OF RELOCATED
SIGN
±7'-0" NEW METER CAN TO BE INSTALLED
WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT
POLE. GWP TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUM OF
60A SERVICE AND SERVICE METER
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C 1 NEW DISCONNECT/LOAD
CENTER ℄
±6'-0"
D-2
NEW METER FACE SITE NAME
℄
±4'-6" CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS HUB
LOCATION EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS GRADE
±0'-0"
TOP OF CONCRETE
FOUNDATION
±0'-0"
GLENDALE, CA
91201
FINISHED GRADE
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX
FOR
FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE
PERMIT)
6 SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
(1) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX
FOR
POWER
5 STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
EXTENET TO REMOVE
EXISTING
FOUNDATION
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0"
OF (3) 1.25" HDPE FIBER CONDUITS FROM
PULL
BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 30"
1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±45'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
PULL BOX TO PULL BOX AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-6"
X
8'-0" REINFORCED
FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
-
S6 SHEET NAME
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 1" RGC POWER
CONDUIT
FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" FOR GLENDALE
STREET LIGHT POWER FEED
3'-6" EXISTING AND NEW
EAST
ELEVATIONS
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 2" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"
SHEET NUMBER
A-4
EXISTING EAST ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST)
24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-
0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-
0"
1 NEW EAST ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST)
24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-
0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-
0"
2 2'
2' 1' 0" 2' 2' 1' 0"
319 of 642
ALPHA = 0°
GAMMA = 240° BETA = 120°
CARRIER
AZIMUTHS 1 Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
| &
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
GWP COMMENTS DYP
(FOR REFERENCE STAMP
R ONLY)
RF SIGNAGE
DETAIL
ERICSSON - AIR
6705
2 CONCEALMENT SHROUD
DETAIL
RAYCAP - RSCAC-1333-P-240
4 DIMENSIONS: WEIGHT:16.2" X 8.1" X
6.1"
31 LBS (14KG)
EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23
SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
SITE NAME
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 HUB
LOCATION
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
1544 W KENNETH FRONT OF
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SHEET NAME
EQUIPMENT
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
D-1
ANTENNA
DETAIL 3 DISCONNECT
DETAIL 5
320 of 642
MILBANK - U7490-RLTG4 TERMINAL RING TYPE SMALL HUB OPEN TRIPLEX GROUND 125 AMPERE
TYPE:
APPLICATION:
STANDARD:
VOLTAGE RATING:
AMPERAGE RATING:
PHASE:
RING TYPE METER SOCKET
METER SOCKET
UL LISTED; TYPE 3R
600 VOLTS ALTERNATING CURRENT
125 CONTINUOUS AMPERE
FREQUENCY RATING: 1 PHASE
SIZE:
NUMBER OF MAIN
BREAKERS:
MAIN BREAKER SIZE:
CABLE ENTRY:
TERMINAL:
INSULATION:
MOUNTING:
MATERIAL:
NUMBER OF JAWS:
BYPASS PROVISION:
NUMBER OF METER
POSITIONS:
EQUIPMENT GROUND:
HUB/CLOSING PLATE:
LINE SIDE WIRE RANGE:
LOAD SIDE WIRE RANGE:
NUMBER OF RECEPTACLES:
60 HERTZ
3.313L X 8W X 11.5H
0 NO MAIN BREAKER
OVERHEAD OR UNDERGROUND
LAY IN
GLASS POLYESTER
SURFACE MOUNT
G90 GALVANIZED STEEL WITH POWER COAT
FINISH
4 TERMINAL
NO BYPASS
1 POSITION
TRIPLEX GROUND
SMALL HUB OPENING
6 - 2/0 AWG
6 - 2/0 AWG
0 RF SYSTEM
ANTENNA SCHEDULE
SECTOR
NUMBER OF
ANTENNAS
ANTENNA
MODEL NO.
JUMPER
ANTENNA
ANTENNA
RAD CENTER AZIMUTH COAX SIZE # OF COAX
A
B
C
0° 1
1 1
ERICSSON AIR
6705
ERICSSON AIR
6705
ERICSSON AIR
6705
1/2"
1/2"
1/2"
-
-
-
26'-11 1/2"
26'-11 1/2"
26'-11 1/2"
TBD
TBD
TBD
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
120°
240°
| | |
| &
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
METER CAN
DETAIL
1 RF SYSTEM
SCHEDULE
3 EXPIRES:
12/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23
SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA- R.F. 00237C
INFORMATION
GENERAL PROJECT
RF INFORMATION
ENGINEER:
TBD OSP ENG.: TBD SITE NAME
STREET ADDRESS: 1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
POLE
NUMBER
TBD
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 34° 10' 26.48" N LONGITUDE: 118° 16' 57.06" W
POLE HEIGHT 25'-0" AGL
R.F.
REQUIREMENTS
ANTENNA TIP
HEIGHT
X-ARM ORIENTATION
CROSS STREET
T.B.G. MAP NO.:
PWR E. M. OTHER
28'-0"
N/A HUB
LOCATION GROUND ELV.
±624'-6"
RC AMSL BTS
LOCATION
# OF TRU'S
-
DIVERSITY SEP BTS
TYPE W KENNETH
RD
TBD
- ± 651'-0" ON POLE RRUS
SECTOR A
RC
SECTOR A
ANTENNA
CABLE
LENGTH(S)
SECTOR A
QTY
GLENDALE, CA
AZIMUTH TN 91201
0°
TIP HT.
28'-0"
CITY OF GLENDALE
TBD
26'-11 1/2" ERICSSON AIR
6705 TBD 1 PWR PLANNER/PHONE #
CLOSEST AVAILABLE
PWR.
COMM: GTE, H
SECTOR B
RC
SECTOR B
ANTENNA
CABLE
LENGTH(S)
SECTOR B
AZIMUTH TN QTY
120°
TIP HT.
28'-0"
TBD SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS 26'-11 1/2" ERICSSON AIR
6705 TBD 1 N/A
(EXTENET)
N/A
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
SECTOR C
RC
SECTOR G
ANTENNA
CABLE
LENGTH(S)
SECTOR C
QTY
1 TELCO CONTACT/PHONE
# AZIMUTH TN
240°
TIP HT.
26'-11 1/2" 28'-0" ERICSSON AIR
6705 TBD CLOSEST AVAILABLE TELCO
N/A 1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
SHEET NAME
EQUIPMENT
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
D-2
ANTENNA
SPECIFICATIONS 2 RF
INFORMATION 4
321 of 642
LEGEND:
ELECTRIC
NOTE:
LOCATION OF PEDESTAL, CONDUIT(S), AND
PULL
BOX(ES) TO BE DETERMINED BY GWP
INSPECTOR
DURING PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING
E
F FIBER
OVERHEAD
FIBER
STREET LIGHT
SEWER
NOTES:
1. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY
TO COORDINATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER &
NECESSARY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE
LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING BELOW GRADE
UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ANY
DAMAGE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
EXISTING
BELOW GRADE UTILITIES.
GAS
WATER
TELCO
STORM DRAIN EXISTING OVER
HEAD
STREET LIGHT NOTE: POWER FOR FIBER FACILITIES, MINIMUM
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM
STORM
DRAIN & SEWER FACILITIES TO BE
5'
EDGE TO EDGE.
2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH
UTILITY
COMPANY FOR CONNECTION OF
TEMPORARY AND
PERMANENT POWER TO SITE. THE
TEMPORARY
POWER AND ALL HOOKUP COSTS TO BE PAID
BY
CONTRACTOR.
EXISTING UTILITY WOOD
POLE #TBD TO BE
UTILIZED
FOR POWER P.O.C. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCAL UTILITY
REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPTH, SIZE &
SEPARATION
OF CONDUITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
NOTIFY
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IMMEDIATELY
FOR ANY
DISCREPANCIES.
NOTE:
ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES PARALLEL WITH WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 4' OF
LATERAL CLEARANCE IF THE PROPOSED
UTILITIES ARE INSTALLED AT THE SAME DEPTH
AS THE EXISTING WATER MAIN. IF THE
PROPOSED UTILITIES HAVE A MINIMUM 1'
VERTICAL CLEARANCE FROM THE
EXISTING WATER MAIN, THEN THE LATERAL CLEARANCE
BETWEEN THE PROPOSED UTILITIES AND
THE
EXISTING WATER MAIN SHALL BE 2'.
EXTENET TO INSTALL (1) 3" RIGID
RISER
AS SPOTTED BY GWP.
CONTRACTOR TO
INSTALL CONDUIT 10FT UP POLE 4. CONTRACTOR TO CALL DIG ALERT (800) 227-2600
MINIMUM OF 48 HRS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING
FOR
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
UTILITY POLE TO PULL BOX AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 36"
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
| & CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO HAVE
ALL
NONPUBLIC UTILITIES LOCATED AT THEIR OWN
EXPENSE.
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119 5. NEW UTILITY SERVICES SHOWN NEED TO BE
VERIFIED & APPROVED BY UTILITY
COMPANIES
BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR
TO VERIFY WITH CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER
TO
OBTAIN FINAL APPROVAL.
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE
&
INSTALL (1) 17" X 30" X
24"
PULL BOX FOR POWER
5 JOB#:
NOTE: © COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
E-3 LLC ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES CROSSING WATER
MAINS SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 1'
VERTICAL CLEARANCE FROM THE WATER
MAIN. PLEASE PLAN ACCORDINGLY IN ORDER
TO MAINTAIN THE CLEARANCE BETWEEN
THE
PROPOSED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING WATER MAINS.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG 6. LINES SHOWN DO NOT REPRESENT THE
EXACT
LOCATION OF THE CONDUIT RUNS
CONTRACTOR
TO VERIFY SERVICE LOCATIONS W/ ACTUAL
FIELD
CONDITIONS.
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY INFORM
CLIENT
OF ANY ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE TO EXISTING
UTILITIES BY TELEPHONE AND E-MAIL
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
REGARDLESS OF ABILITY TO REPAIR OR MITIGATE.
A FOLLOW-UP EMAIL REPORT WITH DIGITAL
PHOTOS WILL BE REQUIRED DAILY UNTIL
RESOLUTION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY
CLIENT AND
AFFECTED SERVICE PROVIDERS AND
RECIPIENTS.
AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, CONTRACTOR WILL
EXERCISE ALL EFFORTS TO HAVE REPAIRS MADE
BY QUALIFIED TECHNICIANS AS APPROVED
BY
SERVICE PROVIDER.
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±45'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
PULL BOX TO PULL BOX AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"
EXPIRES:
03/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23
SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C
SITE NAME
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE EXISTING STREET
LIGHT
PULL BOXES AS NEEDED.
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX
FOR
FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE
PERMIT)
6 E-3 HUB
LOCATION
NOTE TO
CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (3) 1.25" HDPE FIBER
CONDUITS
FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 30"
GLENDALE, CA
91201 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE SAWCUT TO
THE
NEAREST SCORE MARK AND BE REPLACED
EQUAL IN
DIMENSION TO THAT REMOVED. NOTE: SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 1" RGC POWER
CONDUIT
FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" FOR GLENDALE
STREET LIGHT POWER FEED
CONTRACTOR TO ALLOW INGRESS AND
EGRESS TO
DRIVEWAYS AT ALL TIMES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FRONT OF NOTE: 1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
THE LOCATIONS AND EXISTENCE OF
UNDERGROUND PIPES, STRUCTURES OR ANY
CONDUITS
SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTAINED BY A
SEARCH
OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. THERE MAY BE
EXISTING
UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THIS
PLAN.
THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 2" SCH. 80 CONCRETE
ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT
FROM
PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"
SHEET NAME
N
PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT
THE
UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER
LINES NOT
SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.
UTILITY SITE
5 EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL (1) PLAN E-3 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR
POWER
SHEET NUMBER
E-1
UTILITY SITE
PLAN
24"x36" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-
0"
11"x17" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-
0"
4' 3' 2' 1' 1
0"
4'
322 of 642
ELECTRICAL
NOTES
GROUNDING
NOTES
NOTE #1: CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF ELECTRIC SINGLE LINE AND WIRING PLAN. IF CONDITIONS EXIST THAT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO THE
ELECTRIC
SINGLE LINE OR WIRING PLAN, CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ELECTRICAL
ENGINEER FOR
A REVISED E SHEET.
1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, 2019 CEC AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES.
1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND INSPECT
THE
EXISTING FACILITY GROUNDING SYSTEM AND LIGHTNING
PROTECTION SYSTEM (AS DESIGNED AND INSTALLED)
FOR
STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEC (AS ADOPTED BY
THE AHJ),
THE SITE-SPECIFIC (UL, LPI, OR NFPA) LIGHTING
PROTECTION
CODE, AND GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH TELCORDIA
AND TIA
GROUNDING STANDARDS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT
ANY VIOLATIONS OR ADVERSE FINDINGS TO THE CONTRACTOR
FOR RESOLUTION.
NOTE #2: BREAKERS MUST COMPLY WITH AT LEAST CURVE (3) TRIPPING
CHARACTERISTICS
AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH IEC/60934. 15A BREAKER SIZED FOR PSU INPUT CURRENT LIMITING SELECTOR SWITCH SET @ 8.5A.
2. 3.
CONDUIT ROUTINGS ARE SCHEMATIC.
SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL CONDUITS SO THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT IS NOT
BLOCKED. WIRING, RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC
AND
TELCORDIA.
(3) ERICSSON PANEL
ANTENNAS W/
(3) INTEGRATED
4. RRU'S
5. 6.
ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM
CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC AND
TELCORDIA.
CABLES SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH LADDERSTYLE
CABLE TRAY RUNGS.
EACH END OF EVERY POWER, POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR (I.E.,
HOTS), GROUNDING, AND T1 CONDUCTOR AND CABLE
SHALL BE
LABELED WITH COLOR-CODED INSULATION OR
ELECTRICAL
TAPE (3M BRAND, 1/2 INCH PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE WITH UV PROTECTION, OR EQUAL). THE IDENTIFICATION METHOD
SHALL
CONFORM WITH NEC & OSHA.
ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY
LABELED WITH ENGRAVED LAMACOID PLASTIC LABELS. ALL
EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE LABELED WITH THEIR VOLTAGE RATING,
PHASE
CONFIGURATION, WIRE CONFIGURATION, POWER OR
AMPACITY
RATING, AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (I.E.,
PANELBOARD
AND CIRCUIT ID'S).
2. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING
TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, LIGHTNING PROTECTION,
AND AC
POWER GES'S) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER, AT OR
BELOW
GRADE, BY TWO OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC.
(N) 3" U.G. CONDUIT ONLY
(CABLE BY GWP)
(N) PULL BOX
17" x 30" x 24"
SEE NOTE #2
3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL
PERFORM IEEE FALL-OF-POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING 2 (PER IEEE
1100 AND 81) FOR NEW GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS.
THE
SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL
SUPPLEMENTAL
GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT
OF 5 OHMS OR LESS.
(E) UTILITY WOOD
POLE #TBD
10A, 2P
10A, 2P
7. 3/4"C-2#12
4. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED
EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER
CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT.
(N) GWP U.G. INCOMING
ELECTRICAL SERVICE 2"C -
60A,
240V, 1Ø, 2W
1 3/4"C-3#6 E.G.
30A, 2P 10A, 2P
N
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
8. 9.
PANELBOARDS (ID NUMBERS) AND INTERNAL CIRCUIT
BREAKERS (CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS) SHALL BE CLEARLY
LABELED WITH ENGRAVED LAMACOID PLASTIC LABELS.
5. EACH BTS CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO
THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED
SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, 6 AWG
STRANDED
COPPER OR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS; 2 AWG
STRANDED
COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS.
6. EXOTHERMIC WELDS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL GROUNDING
CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE.
7. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E., CONDUCTIVE GEL OR
PASTE) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND
BOLTED
GROUND CONNECTIONS.
8. ALUMINUM CONDUCTOR OR COPPER CLAD STEEL CONDUCTOR
SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS.
9. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON-ELECTRICAL METAL
BOXES, FRAMES AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE BONDED TO
THE
GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC.
10. METAL CONDUIT AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE
ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING
FITTINGS OR
BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUITY WITH 6 AWS COPPER WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS. | | | G | &
(N) SERVICE METER TO
BE
PROVIDED BY GWP
3/4"C-1#8 GND Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
ALL TIE WRAPS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH APPROVED CUTTING
TOOL TO REMOVE SHARP EDGES. POWER, CONTROL,
AND
EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT
SHALL BE
SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 600 V, OIL
RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER
CABLE RATED FOR 90 °C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION;
LISTED OR
LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED,
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING LOCATED
INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#6 AWG OR
LARGER),
600 V, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2 GREEN
INSULATION,
CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90 °C
(WET AND
DRY) OPERATION; LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE
LOCATION AND
RACEWAY SYSTEM USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED.
POWER AND CONTROL WIRING, NOT IN TUBING OR CONDUIT,
SHALL BE MULTI-CONDUCTOR, TYPE TC CABLE (#14 AWG OR
LARGER), 600 V, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B
STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90 °C (WET AND DRY)
OPERATION; WITH OUTER JACKET; LISTED OR LABELED
FOR THE
LOCATION USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119 (N) (22,000 A.I.C.) PANEL
"A"
(RSCAC-1333-P-240) MTD. WITHIN POLE AT 6'
CADWELD TO
(N) 125A RATED METER CAN GROUND ROD
(SEE SHEET D-2 FOR METER CAN
DETAILS)
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC (SEE SHEET A-3 & A4) COPPER-CLAD GROUND
ROD 5/8"Ø x 10' L
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
10. 11.
12. INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
NOTE: SEE WT GROUP SHEETS E-1 FOR SITE PLAN
AND A-3
& A-4 FOR POLE EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS
CONNECTED LOAD
SUMMARY VOLTAGE DROP
TABLE GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
METER/MAIN TOTAL CONNECTION
LOAD
= 10A @ 240V, 1Ø, 2W
2#10 AWG. CU.
2#12 AWG. CU.
1 2
~5' L
20' L
%VD = 0.27%
%VD = NEGL
ALL POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
CRIMP-STYLE, COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRENUTS BY
THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND WIRENUTS SHALL
BE RATED FOR OPERATION AT NO LESS THAN 75°C
(90°C IF
AVAILABLE).
SINGLE LINE
DIAGRAM 2
13. 14.
RACEWAY AND CABLE TRAY SHALL BE LISTED OR
LABELED FOR
ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL,
ANSI/IEEE,
AND NEC. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E., RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40, OR RIGID PVC
SCHEDULE 80 FOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE)
SHALL BE USED FOR EXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS.
ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), ELECTRICAL
NONMETALLIC TUBING (ENT), OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT
(RIGID PVC, SCHEDULE 40) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED
INDOOR LOCATIONS.
GALVANIZED STEEL INTERMEDIATE METALLIC CONDUIT
(IMC)
SHALL BE USED FOR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS ABOVE GRADE.
RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E., RIGID PVC
SCHEDULE 40 OR
RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 80) SHALL BE USED UNDERGROUND;
DIRECT BURIED, IN AREAS OF OCCASIONAL LIGHT
VEHICLE
TRAFFIC OR ENCASED IN REINFORCED CONCRETE IN
AREAS OF
HEAVY VEHICLE TRAFFIC.
(22,000 A.I.C.)
PANEL
"A"
15. EXPIRES:
03/31/24
SIGNED:
30A 240 1 2 30A - 2P NEMA 4X 06/27/23 BUS VOLTS PHASE
P
WIRE MAIN TYPE
P SITE NUMBER
O
L
VOLT AMPS
PHASE A PHASE
B
VOLT AMPS
PHASE A PHASE
B
R
E
C
L
T
G
O
L
E
B
K
R
C
I
R
C
I
R
B
K
R
L
TG
R
E
C
16. 17.
REMARK REMARK
RRU #2
E SW-CA-GLENDA500 RRU #1 00237C
RRU #3
2 10A 10A 2 500
SITE NAME
500 2 10A
18. 19.
20. 21.
LIQUID-TIGHT FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT (LIQUID-TITE
FLEX)
SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE
VIBRATION
OCCURS OR FLEXIBILITY IS NEEDED.
CONDUIT AND TUBING FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED OR
COMPRESSION-TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE
LOCATION USED.
SETSCREW FITTINGS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
CABINETS, BOXES, AND WIREWAYS SHALL BE LISTED OR
LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA,
UL, ANSI/IEEE, AND NEC.
WIREWAYS SHALL BE EPOXY-COATED (GRAY) AND
INCLUDE A
HINGED COVER, DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARD; SHALL
BE PANDUIT TYPE E (OR EQUAL); AND RATED NEMA 1
(OR
BETTER) INDOORS, OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS.
EQUIPMENT CABINETS, TERMINAL BOXES, JUNCTION
BOXES,
AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED OR EPOXY- COATED
SHEET STEEL, SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 50, AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS, OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS
METAL DEVICE BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED, EPOXY- COATED,
OR NON-CORRODING; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 514A
AND
NEMA OS 1; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS, ORWEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS.
NONMETALLIC DEVICE BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA
OS 2; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS, OR WEATHER
PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS.
CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 HUB
LOCATION VA/LINE
PHASE B = 1000 WPHASE A = 500 W GLENDALE, CA
CONTINUOUS 91201
LOADS
NON-CONTINUOUS
LOADS
TOTAL ADJUST WATT
=
TOTAL ADJUST AMPS
=
1875 1500 W x1.25= 1875 W 0 W
7.8 A W/LCL SITE POLE # &
22. ADDRESS
23. STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
1544 W KENNETH FRONT OF
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
1. UTILITY POINTS OF SERVICE AND WORK / MATERIALS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES
AND ARE FOR BID PURPOSES
ONLY. 24.
25. 26.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY FOR FINAL AND EXACT WORK / MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCT TO UTILITY COMPANY ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL CONDUIT, PULL ROPES, CABLES, PULL BOXES, CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF CONDUIT (IF REQUIRED), TRANSFORMER PAD, BARRIERS, POLE RISERS, TRENCHING, BACKFILL, PAY ALL UTILITY COMPANY FEES AND INCLUDE ALL REQUIREMENTS IN SCOPE OF WORK.
SHEET NAME
SINGLE LINE
DIAGRAM &
PANEL SCHEDULE
THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN NECESSARY
AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE
COMMENCING WORK ON THE AC POWER DISTRIBUTION
PANELS.
THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY
TAGGING
ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS
IN
3. SEE WT GROUP SHEET G-1 FOR GROUNDING DETAILS.
4. SEE WT GROUP SHEET D-1 FOR EQUIPMENT DETAILS. SHEET NUMBER E-2
ELECTRICA
L
1 PANEL
SCHEDULE
3 323 of 642
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
EXISTING
CONCRETE
PARKWAY
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR GRADE
NATIVE SOIL
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX)
BEDDING
(TYP.)
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
| &
SUBGRADE
(TYP.)
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
JOB#: TRENCH DETAIL (FIBER ONLY UNDER T2100237
CONCRETE) 2 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX
DETAIL
5 COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP,
LLC ©
BOLTDOWN
(4X) ꢁ 24" X 36" X 18"
VAULT
ARMORCAST,
A6001974TAPCX18
LID TO BE MARKED
"EXTENET"
LID TO BE
ARMORCAST,
A6001975TAPCX18
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS
PARKWAY
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
ꢁ
ꢁ
24-1/4" INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
35-7/8" 0
1 2
3 4
09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
GRADE
POLYMER CONCRETE
COVER
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
NATIVE SOIL ARMORCAST
LOGO NON-SKID
SURFACE
LIFT PIN (2X) 26-5/8" 38-1/8"
BACKFILL STD. MARKING
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX) 18"
BEDDING
(TYP.)
POLYMER CONCRETE
BOX
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
EXPIRES:
03/31/24
SIGNED:
06/27/23
SUBGRADE
(TYP.) SITE NUMBER
OPEN BASE
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C TRENCH DETAIL (FIBER ONLY UNDER
DIRT/GRASS) 3 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX
DETAIL
6 SITE NAME
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
CA002_GLENDALE_1
PROPOSED INSTALLATION 37 OF
CONDUIT IS TO BE BY METHOD
OF DIRECTIONAL BORE
EXISTING
ASPHALT
HUB
GRADE LOCATION GRADE
GLENDALE, CA
91201
EXISTING
PAVEMENT/CONCRETE
EXISTING ROAD BASE MATERIAL
CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE
SITE POLE # &
ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF (COMPACT PRIOR TO RESURFACING) 1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
NATIVE SOIL
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX) SHEET NAME
BEDDING
(TYP.) CONDUIT
PLACEMENT
DETAILS
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER) (3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
SUBGRADE
(TYP.)
SHEET NUMBER
E-3
NOT USED 1 TRENCH DETAIL (FIBER ONLY UNDER
ASPHALT) 4 BORE DETAIL (FIBER ONLY) 7
324 of 642
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION.
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION.
TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
EXISTING
CONCRETE
PARKWAY
TRENCH
WIDTH
24" MIN.
EXISTING
CONCRETE
PARKWAY
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
EXISTING
CONCRETE
PARKWAY
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
GRADE GRADE GRADE
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX)
NATIVE SOIL NATIVE SOIL NATIVE SOIL
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX)
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX) (1) 2" SCH. 40 PVC FIBER CONDUIT
(EXTENET FIBER)
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
12" MIN. HORIZONTAL
SEPARATION FROM
POWER
BEDDING
(TYP.) BEDDING
(TYP.)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
(1) RGC CONDUIT
(GLENDALE STREET
LIGHTING)
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
| | |
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
| &
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion.
SUBGRADE
(TYP.) 6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV
89119
JOB#: TRENCH DETAIL (POWER ONLY UNDER T2100237
CONCRETE) 1 JOINT TRENCH DETAIL (POWER/FIBER UNDER
CONCRETE) 4 TRENCH DETAIL (STREET LIGHTING UNDER
CONCRETE) 7 ©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP,
LLC
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. PROPOSED
EXCAVATION.
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
TRENCH
WIDTH
12" MIN.
TRENCH
WIDTH
24" MIN.
EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS
PARKWAY
EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS
PARKWAY
EXISTING
DIRT/GRASS
PARKWAY
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
GRADE GRADE GRADE
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX)
GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
NATIVE SOIL NATIVE SOIL NATIVE SOIL
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX)
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX) (1) 2" SCH. 40 PVC FIBER CONDUIT
(EXTENET FIBER)
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
12" MIN. HORIZONTAL
SEPARATION FROM
POWER
BEDDING
(TYP.) BEDDING
(TYP.)
(1) RGC CONDUIT
(GLENDALE STREET
LIGHTING)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
EXPIRES:
03/31/24
SIGNED:
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER 06/27/23
CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL) SITE NUMBER SUBGRADE
(TYP.)
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C TRENCH DETAIL (POWER ONLY UNDER
DIRT/GRASS) 2 JOINT TRENCH DETAIL (POWER/FIBER UNDER DIRT/GRASS) 5 TRENCH DETAIL (STREET LIGHTING UNDER DIRT/GRASS) 8
NOTES:
1. SIMILAR CONSTRUCTION FOR FEWER CONDUITS.
2. NO CUTS THROUGH THE EXISTING CONCRETE SHALL BE MADE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
REMOVE/REPAIR THE EXISTING SQUARE CUT SECTIONS ALONG THE NEW TRENCH.
3. BWP CONDUIT TO ENTER VERTICALLY (USE 90° SWEEP WITH MIN. 36" RADIUS. CONDUIT SHOULD TERMINATE 6" ABOVE GRAVEL AND 8" UNDERNEATH LID. DOT NOT CUT SWEEP.
SITE NAME
PROPOSED TRENCH EXCAVATION. WIDTH
12" MIN.
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION. CA002_GLENDALE_1
37 TRENCH
WIDTH
24" MIN.
REPLACE BASE & FINISHED
SURFACE
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
EXISTING
ASPHALT EXISTING
ASPHALT HUB CONCRETE LOCATION SIDEWALK
(NOTE 2)
GRADE GRADE UNTREATED
BASE
MATERIAL (TYP.) TOP OF
SIDEWALK GLENDALE, CA
91201 BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX)
EXISTING
PAVEMENT/
CONCRETE EXISTING
PAVEMENT/CONCRETE
EXISTING ROAD BASE MATERIAL
EXISTING ROAD
BASE
MATERIAL
SITE POLE # & NATIVE SOIL PULL BOX ADDRESS
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
CRUSHED
AGGREGATE
BASE (COMPACT
PRIOR
TO RESURFACING)
CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE
(COMPACT PRIOR TO RESURFACING) 1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
NATIVE SOIL
(1) 2" SCH. 40 PVC FIBER CONDUIT
(EXTENET FIBER)
BACKFILL
(ONE SACK
SAND
SLURRY MIX) SHEET NAME 12" MIN. HORIZONTAL
SEPARATION FROM
POWER
BEDDING 3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYP.)
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
CONDUIT
PLACEMENT
DETAILS (1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
PVC/RIGID CONDUIT
PER PLAN
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
90° BEND MAX W/ 3'-
0"
RADIUS PVC SWEEP 3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
SHEET BOTTOM OF NUMBER
TRENCH E-4
TRENCH DETAIL (POWER ONLY UNDER
ASPHALT) 3 JOINT TRENCH DETAIL (POWER/FIBER UNDER
ASPHALT) 6 CONDUIT STUB-UP/TRENCH
DETAIL
9 325 of 642
#4 OR #6 AWG STRANDED CU
CONDUCTOR WITH GREEN,
600V, THWN-2 INSULATION
GROUNDING
SYMBOLS:
5/8" X 10'-0" ,CU. GND ROD IN
TEST WELL 30" MIN. BELOW GRADE.
GROUNDING BAR ON WALL,
FLOOR OR ANTENNA
TOWER
FINISHED GRADE GROUND CHEMICAL GROUND BUSBAR ROD
(XIT GROUND ROD)
1" RIGID GALVANIZED
CONDUIT GREEN
COPPER
GROUND WIRE
CADWELD
CONNECTION PULL BOX LID SHALL BE
INSCRIBED
"STREET LIGHTING" 1/16"
(TYP) MECHANICAL
CONNECTION
(2) EXOTHERMIC TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG SOLID BARE
TINNED COPPER GROUNDING
CONDUCTOR, EXOTHERMIC
HALO GROUND
CONNECTION 12" X 22" PULL
BOX GROUND BAR WELD TO BE BURIED GROUNDING
RING AND GROUNDING BAR GROUNDING G G G G G PVC NONMETALLIC CONDUIT SCH 40 TYPE (NMC) CONDUIT WITH STRAP WITHIN TWO INCHES OF CONDUIT END
6" 1-1/2" SYSTEM
CONDUIT
1 GROUNDING
LEGEND
3 5/8" GROUND GROUNDING BAR ROD DETAIL
GROUNDING NOTES:
CRUSHED
ROCK
Engineering ꢀ Design ꢀ Consulting Structural
Civil Land Survey
Accessibility
Consulting
| Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Telecommunication Aquatic
Design Program Management
1-1/2" SYSTEM
CONDUIT
| | |
| &
Engineering with Precision, Pace &
Passion. 2" DRAIN
HOLE 6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-
271
wtgroup.com
| Las Vegas, NV 1. THE CONDUIT ROUTING ARE DIAGRAMMATICALLY SHOWN ON THE 89119
PLANS AND
ARE ONLY APPROXIMATIONS. THE EXACT LOCATION AND ROUTING
SHALL BE
FIELD VERIFIED.
#2 AWG GREEN INSULATED
STRANDED COPPER WIRE
(EXISTING GROUNDING HALO)
T&B CO. "C-TAP", CAT.
#54730,
CRIMP TYPE PARALLELED
TAP OR EQUIVALENT
JOB#:
©COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, T2100237
LLC
2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY 'FUTURE CARRIER' WITH
THE RESULTS
FROM PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND POST- CONSTRUCTION OHM
TESTING
(GROUNDING) RESULTS ON ALL MODIFIED CELL SITES AND AS REQUIRED BY 'FUTURE CARRIER' GROUNDING & BONDING STANDARD TP-76416.
GROUNDING
DETAIL
7 DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: JKR
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
WTG
INT.
WTG
DYP
DYP
DYP
3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE TWO
APPROVED
"FALL OF POTENTIAL" TESTS. THE FIRST, WILL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR
TO MAKING
CONNECTIONS AND THE SECOND WILL BE CONDUCTED AFTER THE
FINAL
CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO NEW EQUIPMENT, THE
SUPPLEMENTAL
GROUNDING SYSTEM, AND THE EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM. THESE TESTS
SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED TESTING AGENT. PROVIDE
INDEPENDENT TEST RESULTS TO THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR REVIEW. THE
GROUNDING SYSTEM RESISTANCE TO EARTH GROUNDING SHALL NOT EXCEED (5)
OHMS. IF THE GROUNDING TEST EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM OF (5) OHMS, THE
SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL GROUNDING RODS AND CONNECTIONS AS REQUIRED TO MEET THE (5) OHMS' MAXIMUM.
NEW ANTENNA W/
INTEGRATED RRU
(TYP.)
0 1
2 3
4 09/23/21
11/11/22
01/11/23
02/21/23
04/12/23
90% REVIEW
UPDATED
STRUCTURAL
1A
#6 AWG GREEN
INSULATED
STRANDED COPPER WIRE
(UNIT BOND)
DIRECTION OF BOND
TO
TURN TO SHORTEST
DISTANCE TO MGB GWP COMMENTS DYP
STAMP
4. THE INSPECTOR HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL INSPECT ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS FOR TIGHTNESS. EXOTHERMIC WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BEFORE BEING PERMANENTLY CONCEALED.
GROUND WIRE
CONNECTION
4 5. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STRAIN-RELIEF AND CABLE
SUPPORTS FOR
ALL CABLE ASSEMBLIES, COAX CABLES, AND RET CONTROL CABLES. CABLE
STRAIN-RELIEF AND CABLE SUPPORTS SHALL BE APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSE.
INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
TYPE SS TYPE TA TYPE GT TYPE GY TYPE NC
6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL GROUND ALL EQUIPMENT. INCLUDING
ANTENNAS,
RET MOTORS, DIPLEXER'S, TMA'S, COAX CABLES, AND RET CONTROL CABLES AS A COMPLETE SYSTEM. GROUNDING SHALL BE EXECUTED BY QUALIFIED WIREMEN
IN COMPLIANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS.
EXPIRES:
03/31/24
SIGNED:
G G G G G G G G 06/27/23
TYPE PG
TYPE LJ
TYPE HA
TYPE GR
TYPE VS TYPE NX1
TYPE PC
TYPE ND
TYPE RR
SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA00237C 7. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLLING DEVICES SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH ENGRAVED LAMICOID NAMEPLATES, INDICATING
THE CIRCUITS
ORIGINATION AND ALL EQUIPMENT TERMINATIONS.
TYPE GL LUG SITE NAME
8. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL BREAKERS, CONDUITS, CABLE TRAY,
AND CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS, AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED
SYSTEM AND
SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
#6 AWG GREEN INSULATED
STRANDED COPPER WIRE,
(TYP.)
CA002_GLENDALE_1
NEW COPPER GROUND 37 BAR
TYPE XA TYPE VB TYPE PH TYPE GR AT ANTENNA LOCATION
HUB
LOCATION
EXOTHERMIC
CONNECTION
5 GLENDALE, CA
91201
SITE POLE # & 1 BOLT ADDRESS PARALLEL
CLAMP
BOLT GRND.
ROD CLAMP 2 HOLE LUG
STRUCTURE ID:
SL_6164
FRONT OF
UNIVERSAL
PIPE
CLAMPS 75/1.25
G G G G G
1544 W KENNETH
RD.
GLENDALE, CA
91201
#8 AWG GREEN INSULATED
STRANDED COPPER WIRE,
TO
GROUND BAR AT POLE
LOCATION
2 BOLT
PARALLEL
SPLICER
CAST "T"
SPLICER
SHEET NAME
GROUNDING
DIAGRAM,
NOTES AND
DETAILS
"U" BOLT PIPE
CLAMP
UNIVERSAL
PIPE
CLAMPS 50H2
1 BOLT
PARALLEL
CLAMP
CROSS RUN
CLAMP
SHEET NUMBER G-1
GROUNDING
NOTES
2 MECHANICAL
CONNECTION
6 GROUNDING
DIAGRAM
8 326 of 642
327 of 642
328 of 642
329 of 642
330 of 642
331 of 642
332 of 642
AHZ Consulting
Engineers Raycap Pole
Design
Prepared for Raycap – Verizon New
Site Build
S I T E I N F O R M A T I
O N
Address Glendale,
CA
Verizon Site Name
Raycap Project
Number
NB+C Project
Number
Date
ExtenetGlendale Poles Phase 2 (25ft
Pole)
VZ22-01389H-29
100111
December 16,
2022
NB+C Engineering Services,
LLC
Prepared by: Ian
Suppo
Respectfully Submitted
by:
Arash Zandieh, P.E.
Principal Engineer CA PE License
#C82118
333 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
1 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
PURPOSE /
ASSUMPTIONS The purpose of these calculation is to design light pole located in Glendale, CA for supporting the
new Verizon Wireless panel antennas. Contractor to verify the site specific conditions prior to
fabrications)
Code - 2018 IBC and ANSI/TIA222 -H
Ultimate
Windspeed
Exposure Category
Site Class
- 95mph
- C
-II
Ice Thickness
Ice Windspeed
Goetech
Condition
- 0in
- 30mph
- Presumptive Soil Parameters provided by
ANSI/TIA-222 -H
- Ground Water assumed at 1ft A nnex F
depth
- Neglected Soil depth - 2ft
Raycap Pole Mount Pole Design
Summary:
Base Pole - 12" STD pipe stressed at
35.4%
Base Plate
Anchor Bolts
Foundation
- 1.25" A36 thick base plate, 21"diameter stressed
at 37.9%
- (4) 1.25" bolts with bolt center 17" stressed at
47.9%
- 42" ϕ x8' minimum embedment
Structural Analysis :
Passing
334 of 642
27.8 ft
DESIGNED APPURTENANCE
TYPE LOADINGELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION
6705 Street
Macro
26.92 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
1 22.5
6705 Street
Macro
6705 Street
Macro
26.92 26.92
CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
2 15
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A
12.8 (1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (7.8ft
to17.8ft)
25.0 ft CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB
26.92 CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB
26.92 CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB
26.92 Enclosed Equipment (500
lbs)
6 CCISeismic stealth 6
Enclosed
Equipment (500 lbs)
CCISeismic Tower Section 1 -
1 Radome (16ø x 2.75ft)
26.4 26.29
26.29 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
3 5
CCISeismic stealth Radome
(16ø x
2.75ft)
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A
3.9 (1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (0ft
to7.8ft)
Street Light Arm 24
Street Light (3sq 24
ft) CCISeismic miscl Street Light (3sq ft)
24 CCISeismic miscl Street Light Arm
24CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A
22.8 (1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (17.8ft
to27.8ft)
MATERIAL
GRADE Fy STRENGTH Fu GRADE Fy Fu
A53-B35 35 ksi 60 ksi A500-42 42 ksi 58 ksi
TOWER DESIGN NOTES
1. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-H Standard.
2. Tower designed for a 95 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA222-H Standard.
3. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind.
4. Tower Risk Category II.
5. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 ft
6. CCISeismic Note: Seismic loads generated by CCISeismic 3.3.5
7. CCISeismic Note: Seismic calculations are in accordance with TIA-222- H
8. TOWER RATING: 24.4%
ALL
REACTIONS
ARE
FACTORED AXIAL
3 K
SHEAR
2 K
MOMENT
40 kip-ft
SEISMIC
AXIAL
3 K
SHEAR
1 K
MOMENT
13 kip-ft
0.0 ft
TORQUE 1 kipREACTIONS - 95 mph ft
WIND
NB+C Job: ExtenetGlendale
6095 Marshalee Dr. PolesPhs2 Project: VZ22-
01389H-29 Client: Raycap
(100111)
Drawn by: isuppo
Date: 12/13/22
App'd: Elkridge, MD
21075
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Code: TIA-222-H
Path:
Scale: NTS
Dwg No. E-1 Network Building +
Consulting
R:\BlueBell\Projects\StealthStructural Design(26702)\ExtenetGlendalePolesPhs2(VZ22-01389H29)\Structural\25ft\Analysis\tnx\ExtenetGlendalePolesPhs2.eri 335 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 1 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Tower Input
Data
The tower is a monopole.
This tower is designed using the TIA-222-H
standard.
The following design criteria apply: Tower base elevation above sea level: 561.00 ft.
Basic wind speed of 95 mph.
Risk Category II.
Exposure Category C.
Simplified Topographic Factor Procedure for wind speed-up calculations is used.
Topographic Category: 1. Crest Height: 0.00
ft. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph.
CCISeismic Note: Seismic loads generated by CCISeismic
3.3.5. CCISeismic Note: Seismic calculations are in accordance with TIA-222-H.
A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used.
Pressures are calculated at each section.
Stress ratio used in pole design is 1.
Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feed line supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered.
Pole Section
Geometry Section Elevation Section
Length
ft
Pole
Size
Pole
Grade
Socket Length
ft
ft
L1
L2
27.80-25.00 2.80 P 3.5 STD A53-B35
(35 ksi)
A500-42
(42 ksi)
25.00-0.00 25.00 HSS12.75x.375
Tower
Elevation
Gusset
Area
(per face)
Gusset
Thickness
Gusset Grade Adjust.
Factor
Af
Adjust.
Factor
Ar
Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle
Double AngleStitch Bolt
Spacing
Diagonals
in
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Horizontals
in
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Redundants
ft ft in 2in
L1 27.80-25.00
L2 25.00-0.00
1 1
1 1
1 1
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered
As Area Description Face Allow
or Shield
Leg
Exclude
Component
Placement
ft
Total
Number
CAAA
ft2/ft
0.00 Weight
plf
From
Torque
Calculation
Yes
Type
LDF7-50A (1-
5/8
FOAM)
B No Inside Pole 27.80 - 0.00 6 No Ice 0.82
336 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 2 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances
Section Areas Tower
Section
Tower
Elevation
ft
Face AR AF CAAA
In Face
ft2
CAAA
Out Face
ft2
Weight
ft2ft2 K
L1
L2
27.80-25.00 A
B
C
A
B
C
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.12 0.00
25.00-0.00
User Defined Loads -
Seismic Description Elevation Offset
From
Centroid
ft
Azimuth
Angle
Ev Ehx Ehz Eh
ft ° K K K K
CCISeismic Tower Section 1
- 1
CCISeismic Tower Section 2
- 1
CCISeismic Tower Section 2
- 2
CCISeismic Tower Section 2
- 3
CCISeismic ericsson
26.40 22.50
15.00 5.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.0000 0.01
0.07 0.13
0.13 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.05 0.38
0.50 0.17
0.06 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
26.92 0.00 0.0000
VZ-AIR6701 TB
CCISeismic
ericsson
VZ-AIR6701 TB
CCISeismic
ericsson
VZ-AIR6701 TB
26.92 26.92
26.29 6.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.01 0.01
0.03 0.14
0.02 0.02
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.06
0.06 0.19
0.22 0.12
0.14 0.08
CCISeismic stealth Radome
(16ø
x 2.75ft)
CCISeismic stealth
Enclosed
Equipment (500 lbs)
CCISeismic miscl Street
Light
(3sq ft)
CCISeismic miscl Street
Light
Arm
CCISeismic (6) andrew
(cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM)
From
0 to 27.8 (17.8ft to27.8ft)
CCISeismic (6) andrew
(cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM)
From
0 to 27.8 (7.8ft to17.8ft)
CCISeismic (6) andrew
(cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM)
From
0 to 27.8 (0ft to7.8ft)
24.00 24.00
22.80 12.80
3.90 0.00
0.00 0.0000
0.0000
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.05 0.01
Discrete Tower
Loads
337 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 3 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Description Face
or
Leg
Offset
Type
Offsets:
Horz
Lateral
Vert
ft
Azimuth
Adjustment
Placement CAAA
Front
CAAA
Side
Weight
° ft ft2
ft2 K
ft
ft
6705 Street
Macro
6705 Street
Macro
C
A
B
C
C
C
C
From Leg
From Leg
From Face
From Leg
From Leg
From Leg
From Leg
0.50 0.00
0.00 0.50
0.00 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.00 0.50
0.00 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.00 7.00
0.00 0.00
6.00 0.00
0.00 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
26.92 26.92
26.92 26.29
6.00 No Ice
No Ice
No Ice
No Ice
No Ice
No Ice
No Ice
1.09 1.09
1.09 1.83
0.00 3.00
3.67 0.83
0.83 0.83
1.83 0.00
3.00 3.67
0.03 0.03
0.03 0.10
0.50 0.07
0.08 6705 Street
Macro
Radome (16ø x 2.75ft)
Enclosed Equipment (500
lbs)
Street Light (3sq ft)
Street Light Arm
24.00 24.00
Force
Totals Load
Case
Vertical
Forces
Sum of
Forces
X
Sum of
Forces
Z
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mx
kip-ft
Sum of Sum of Torques
Overturning
Moments, Mz
K K K kip-ft kip-ft
Leg Weight
Bracing Weight
Total Member SelfWeight
Total Weight
1.18 0.00
1.18 2.16
0.80 1.41
0.80 -9.93
-8.55
-4.66
0.68 1.41
Wind 0 deg - No Ice 1.30
Wind 30 deg - No Ice
Wind 60 deg - No Ice
Wind 90 deg - No Ice
Wind 120 deg - No
Ice
Wind 150 deg - No
Ice
Wind 180 deg - No
Ice
Wind 210 deg - No
Ice
Wind 240 deg - No
Ice
Wind 270 deg - No
Ice
Wind 300 deg - No
Ice
Wind 330 deg - No
Ice
Total Weight
0.00 0.30
0.51 0.59
0.51 0.29
-0.00
-0.30
-0.51
-0.59
-0.51
-0.29
-0.59
-0.51
-0.30
-0.00
0.29 0.51
0.59 0.51
0.30 0.00
-0.29
-0.51
-0.92
-0.54
-0.01
0.52 0.91
1.06 0.92
0.54 0.01
-0.52
-0.91
-1.06
-4.05
-7.93
-9.31
-7.82
-3.85
1.53 6.06
10.03 11.52
10.14 6.26
6.87 10.76
12.14 10.65
6.68 0.91
-4.47
-8.44
2.16 0.80 1.41
Wind 0 deg - Service
Wind 30 deg - Service
Wind 60 deg - Service
Wind 90 deg - Service
Wind 120 deg -
Service
Wind 150 deg -
Service
0.00 0.13
0.22 0.25
0.21 0.12
-0.25
-0.22
-0.13
-0.00
0.12 -3.52
-2.96
-1.40
0.76 2.92
4.51 1.37 -0.33
-0.19
-0.00
0.19 0.32
0.38 -0.78
-2.35
-2.90
-2.31
0.21 -0.71
338 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 4 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Load
Case
Vertical
Forces
Sum of
Forces
X
Sum of
Forces
Z
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mx
kip-ft
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mz
kip-ft
Sum of Torques
K K K kip-ft
Wind 180 deg -
Service
-0.00
-0.13
-0.22
-0.25
-0.21
-0.12
0.25 0.22
0.13 0.00
-0.12
-0.21
5.11 4.55
2.99 0.84
-1.33
-2.92
1.45 0.33
0.19 0.00
-0.19
-0.32
-0.38
Wind 210 deg -
Service
Wind 240 deg -
Service
Wind 270 deg -
Service
Wind 300 deg -
Service
Wind 330 deg -
Service
Seismic Vertical
3.61 5.17
5.73 5.13
3.54 0.62
Seismic Horizontal 0 deg
Seismic Horizontal 30
deg
Seismic Horizontal 60
deg
Seismic Horizontal 90
deg
Seismic Horizontal 120
deg
Seismic Horizontal 150
deg
Seismic Horizontal 180
deg
Seismic Horizontal 210
deg
Seismic Horizontal 240
deg
Seismic Horizontal 270
deg
Seismic Horizontal 300
deg
Seismic Horizontal 330
deg
0.00 1.04
1.80 2.08
1.80 1.04
0.00 -1.04
-1.80
-2.08
-1.80
-1.04
-2.08
-1.80
-1.04
0.00 1.04
1.80 2.08
1.80 1.04
0.00 -1.04
-1.80
-37.97
-32.88
-18.99
0.00 18.99
32.88 37.97
32.88 18.99
0.00 0.00
-18.99
-32.88
-37.97
-32.88
-18.99
0.00 18.99
32.88 37.97
32.88 18.99
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
-18.99
-32.88
Load
Combinations Comb.
No.
Description
1 Dead Only
2 3
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg - No
Ice
4 5
6 7
8 9
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg - No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 deg - No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 deg - No
Ice
Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 Dead+Wind 30 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 60 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 90 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 120 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 150 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 180 deg -
Service
339 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 5 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Comb.
No.
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 Description
Dead+Wind 210 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 240 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 270 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 330 deg - Service
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 0
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 0 deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 30
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 30
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 60
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 60
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 90
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 90
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 120
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 120
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 150
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 150
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 180
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 180
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 210
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 210
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 240
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 240
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 270
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 270
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 300
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 300
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 330
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 330
deg
Maximum Member
Forces Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Component
Type
Condition Gov.
Load
Comb.
19 42
56 50
56 50
2 1
42 56
50 56
50 24
Axial Major Axis
Moment
kip-ft
-0.00
-0.50
Minor Axis
Moment
kip-ft
-0.00
0.31 -0.02
-0.67
-0.02
-0.67
0.02 K
L1 27.8 - 25 Pole Max Tension
Max.
Compression
Max. Mx
0.00 -0.33
-0.33
-0.33
-0.42
0.42 0.73
0.07 0.73
0.07 Max. My
Max. Vy
Max. Vx
Max. Torque
Max Tension
Max.
Compression
Max. Mx
Max. My
Max. Vy
Max. Vx
Max. Torque
L2 25 - 0 Pole 0.00
-3.21
-3.21
-3.21
-2.09
2.09 0.00
-31.34
39.86 1.71
32.05 1.71
0.00 18.12
-0.96
-39.12
-0.96
-31.30
1.06 Maximum
Reactions Location Condition Gov.
Load
Vertical
K
Horizontal, X
K
Horizontal, Z
K
Comb.
340 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 6 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Location Condition Gov.
Load
Comb.
42 57
39 39
45 24
55 Vertical
K
Horizontal, X
K
Horizontal, Z
K
Pole Max. Vert
Max. Hx
Max. Hz
Max. Mx
Max. Mz
Max. Torsion
Min. Vert
Min. Hx
Min. Hz
Min. Mx
Min. Mz
Min. Torsion
3.21 1.32
1.32 37.33
36.77 1.06
1.32 1.32
1.32 -1.80
2.08 -0.00
-0.00
-2.08
0.29 1.04
0.00 2.08
2.08 0.00
0.51 -1.04
0.00 -2.08
-2.08
0.00 -0.51
1.80 45
51 50
56 -2.08
-0.00
-0.00
2.08 -39.12
-39.86
12 -1.06 -0.29
Tower Mast Reaction
Summary Load
Combination
Vertical Shearx
K
Shearz Overturning
Moment, Mx
kip-ft
Overturning
Moment, Mz
kip-ft
Torque
K K kip-ft
Dead Only
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg -
No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg -
No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg -
No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg -
No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg -
No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg -
No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg -
No
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg -
No
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg
-
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg
-
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg
-
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg
-
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg
-
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg
-
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg
-
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg
-
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg
-
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg
-
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg
-
No Ice
2.16 2.59
0.00 0.00
-0.00
-0.59
0.80 1.42
1.59 -0.00
-9.81 -0.92
-10.04
-8.42
-8.65
-4.52
-4.76
0.85 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 0.00
0.30 0.30
0.51 0.51
0.59 0.59
0.51 0.51
0.29 0.29
-0.00
-0.00
-0.30
-0.30
-0.51
-0.51
-0.59
-0.59
-0.51
-0.51
-0.30
-0.30
-0.00
-0.00
0.29 0.29
0.51 0.51
0.59 0.59
0.51 0.51
0.30 0.30
0.00 1.16 -0.92
-0.54
-0.54
-0.01
-0.01
0.52 0.52
0.91 0.91
1.06 1.06
0.92 0.92
0.54 0.54
0.01 0.01
-0.52
-3.78
-4.20
-7.68
-8.10
-9.06
-9.48
-7.57
-7.98
-3.58
-4.00
1.82 0.61
6.25 6.00
10.23 9.98
11.73 11.48
10.34 10.09
6.44 1.39
7.19 6.75
11.09 10.65
12.47 6.20
1.07 341 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 7 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Load
Combination
Vertical Shearx
K
Shearz
K
Overturning
Moment, Mx
kip-ft
Overturning
Moment, Mz
kip-ft
Torque
K kip-ft
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 270
deg -
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300
deg -
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 300
deg -
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 330
deg -
No Ice
1.94 2.59
1.94 2.59
1.94 -0.59
-0.51
-0.51
-0.29
-0.29
0.00 -0.29
-0.29
-0.51
-0.51
0.83 12.04 -0.52
-0.91
-0.91
-1.06
-1.06
-4.33
-4.56
-8.31
-8.54
10.97 10.54
6.99 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 330
deg -
No Ice
6.56 Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service
Dead+Wind 120 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 150 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 180 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 210 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 240 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 270 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 300 deg -
Service
Dead+Wind 330 deg -
Service
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 0
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 0
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 30
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 30
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 60
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 60
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 90
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 90
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 120
deg
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 0.00
0.13 0.22
0.25 0.21
0.12 -0.00
-0.13
-0.22
-0.25
-0.21
-0.12
0.00 0.00
1.04 1.04
1.80 1.80
2.08 2.08
1.80 -0.25
-0.22
-0.13
-0.00
0.12 0.21
0.25 0.22
0.13 -3.53
-2.97
-1.40
0.76 2.93
4.53 5.13
4.57 3.00
0.84 -1.33
-2.93
-37.19
-37.33
-32.08
-32.23
-18.12
-18.31
0.96 1.38
-0.78
-2.35
-2.91
-2.31
-0.71
1.46 3.62
5.19 5.75
5.15 3.55
1.71 1.28
-17.37
-17.75
-31.34
-31.68
-36.45
-36.77
-31.34
-0.33
-0.19
-0.00
0.19 0.32
0.38 0.33
0.19 0.00
-0.19
-0.32
-0.38
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
-0.12
-0.21
-2.08
-2.08
-1.80
-1.80
-1.04
-1.04
-0.00
-0.00
1.04 0.72
20.04 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
120
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
150
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
150
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
180
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
180
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
210
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
210
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
240
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
240
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
270
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
270
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
300
deg
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
300
deg
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh
330
deg
1.32 3.21
1.32 3.21
1.32 3.21
1.32 3.21
1.32 3.21
1.32 3.21
1.32 3.21
1.32 1.80
1.04 1.04
1.80 1.80
2.08 2.08
1.80 1.80
1.04 1.04
-0.00
-0.00
-1.04
-1.04
-1.80
-1.80
19.74 34.01
33.67 39.12
38.77 34.01
33.67 20.04
19.74 0.96
-31.68
-17.37
-17.75
1.71 0.00
0.00 1.04 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 1.28 0.00
-1.04
-1.04
-1.80
-1.80
-2.08
-2.08
-1.80
-1.80
-1.04
-1.04
20.78 20.30
34.75 34.23
39.86 39.32
34.75 34.23
20.78 20.30
0.00 0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
0.72 -18.12
-18.31
-32.08
0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh -32.23
330
342 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 8 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Load
Combination
Vertical Shearx
K
Shearz
K
Overturning
Moment, Mx
kip-ft
Overturning
Moment, Mz
kip-ft
Torque
K kip-ft
deg
Solution
Summary Sum of Applied
Forces
PY
Sum of Reactions
Load PX PZ PX PY PZ % Error
Comb. K K K K K K
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.30
0.30 0.51
0.51 0.59
0.59 0.51
0.51 0.29
0.29 -0.00
-0.00
-0.30
-0.30
-0.51
-0.51
-0.59
-0.59
-0.51
-0.51
-0.29
-0.29
0.00 0.13
0.22 0.25
0.21 0.12
-0.00
-0.13
-0.22
-0.25
-0.21
-0.12
0.00 0.00
1.04 1.04
1.80 1.80
2.08 2.08
1.80 1.80
1.04 1.04
0.00 0.00
-2.16
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.59
-1.94
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-2.16
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
0.00 -0.59
-0.59
-0.51
-0.51
-0.30
-0.30
-0.00
-0.00
0.29 0.29
0.51 0.51
0.59 0.59
0.51 0.51
0.30 0.30
0.00 0.00
-0.29
-0.29
-0.51
-0.51
-0.25
-0.22
-0.13
-0.00
0.12 0.21
0.25 0.22
0.13 0.00
-0.12
-0.21
-2.08
-2.08
-1.80
-1.80
-1.04
-1.04
0.00 0.00
1.04 1.04
1.80 1.80
2.08 2.08
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.30
-0.30
-0.51
-0.51
-0.59
-0.59
-0.51
-0.51
-0.29
-0.29
0.00 0.00
0.30 0.30
0.51 0.51
0.59 0.59
0.51 0.51
0.29 0.29
-0.00
-0.13
-0.22
-0.25
-0.21
-0.12
0.00 2.16
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.59 1.94
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
2.16 2.16
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
0.00 0.59
0.59 0.51
0.51 0.30
0.30 0.00
0.00 -0.29
-0.29
-0.51
-0.51
-0.59
-0.59
-0.51
-0.51
-0.30
-0.30
-0.00
-0.00
0.29 0.29
0.51 0.51
0.25 0.22
0.13 0.00
-0.12
-0.21
-0.25
-0.22
-0.13
-0.00
0.12 0.21
2.08 2.08
1.80 1.80
1.04 1.04
0.00 0.00
-1.04
-1.04
-1.80
-1.80
-2.08
-2.08
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.002%
0.002%
0.002%
0.002%
0.002%
0.002%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.003%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.001%
0.001%
0.000%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 0.13
0.22 0.25
0.21 0.12
-0.00
-0.00
-1.04
-1.04
-1.80
-1.80
-2.08
-2.08
-1.80
-1.80
-1.04
-1.04
-0.00
-0.00
343 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 9 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Sum of Applied
Forces
Sum of Reactions
Load
Comb.
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 PX
K
PY
K
PZ
K
PX
K
PY
K
PZ
K
% Error
-1.04
-1.04
-1.80
-1.80
-2.08
-2.08
-1.80
-1.80
-1.04
-1.04
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
-3.21
-1.32
1.80 1.80
1.04 1.04
0.00 0.00
-1.04
-1.04
-1.80
-1.80
1.04 1.04
1.80 1.80
2.08 2.08
1.80 1.80
1.04 1.04
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
3.21 1.32
-1.80
-1.80
-1.04
-1.04
0.00 0.00
1.04 1.04
1.80 1.80
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
0.001%
59 60
61 Non-Linear Convergence
Results Load
Combination
Converged? Number
of Cycles
Displacement
Tolerance
Force
Tolerance
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
6 7
7 6
6 6
6 6
6 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
6 7
7 7
7 7
7 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 7
7 7
7 0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00011994
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00011710
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00014642
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00007948
0.00000001
0.00007378
0.00000001
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 344 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 10 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00007266
0.00000001
0.00007724
0.00000001
0.00007459
0.00000001
0.00007844
0.00000001
0.00008503
0.00000001
0.00008117
0.00000001
0.00008223
0.00000001
0.00008718
0.00000001
0.00008081
0.00000001
0.00007701
0.00000001
Maximum Tower Deflections -
Service Wind Section
No.
Elevation Horz.
Deflection
in
0.332
0.279
Gov.
Load
Comb.
34 Tilt Twist
ft ° °
L1
L2
27.8 - 25
25 - 0
0.0910
0.0834
0.0135
34 0.0127
Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature -
Service Wind Elevation Appurtenance Gov.
Load
Comb.
34 34
34 Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of
Curvature
ft
17255
17255
17255
17255
17255
ft in ° °
26.92 26.40
26.29 24.00
22.80 6705 Street Macro
CCISeismic Tower Section 1
- 1
Radome (16ø x 2.75ft)
0.315
0.305
0.303
0.262
0.242
0.0886
0.0872
0.0869
0.0805
0.0771
0.0132
0.0131
0.0131
0.0124
0.0121
Street Light (3sq
ft)
34 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) 34
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to
22.50 27.8 (17.8ft to27.8ft)
15.00 12.80
CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
1 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
2 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to
27.8 (7.8ft to17.8ft)
34 34
34 0.237
0.135
0.111
0.0762
0.0526
0.0452
0.0120
0.0087
0.0076
17159
24556
28776
6.00 5.00
3.90 Enclosed Equipment (500 lbs)
CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
3 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to
27.8 (0ft to7.8ft)
34 34
34 0.048
0.040
0.031
0.0215
0.0180
0.0140
0.0037
0.0031
0.0024
61389
73667
73667
345 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 11 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Maximum Tower Deflections -
Design Wind Section
No.
Elevation Horz.
Deflection
in
0.689
0.583
Gov.
Load
Comb.
18 Tilt Twist
ft ° °
L1
L2
27.8 - 25
25 - 0
0.1843
0.1693
0.0377
18 0.0357
Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature -
Design Wind Elevation Appurtenance Gov.
Load
Comb.
18 18
18 Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of
Curvature
ft
8915
8915
8915
8915
8915
ft in ° °
26.92 26.40
26.29 24.00
22.80 6705 Street Macro
CCISeismic Tower Section 1
- 1
Radome (16ø x 2.75ft)
0.655
0.635
0.631
0.547
0.506
0.1796
0.1768
0.1763
0.1637
0.1568
0.0371
0.0367
0.0367
0.0349
0.0338
Street Light (3sq
ft)
18 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) 18
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to
22.50 27.8 (17.8ft to27.8ft)
15.00 12.80
CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
1 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
2 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to
27.8 (7.8ft to17.8ft)
18 18
18 0.497
0.287
0.236
0.1551
0.1077
0.0927
0.0335
0.0245
0.0213
8866
12687
14868
6.00 5.00
3.90 Enclosed Equipment (500 lbs)
CCISeismic Tower Section 2 -
3 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to
27.8 (0ft to7.8ft)
18 18
18 0.103
0.085
0.066
0.0442
0.0369
0.0288
0.0104
0.0087
0.0068
31718
38062
38062
Compression
Checks
Pole Design
Data Section
No.
Elevation Size L Lu Kl/r A Pu
K
Pn Ratio
Pu
Pn
ft ft ft in2 K
L1
L2
27.8 - 26.4
26.4 - 25
P 3.5 STD 2.80 0.00 0.0
0.0 2.6795
2.6795
-0.16 84.41
84.41 0.002
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
-0.33
-0.63
-0.72
-0.86
-0.94
-1.02
-1.09
-1.17
-1.25
-1.46
-1.55
-1.62
-1.70
25 - 23.75
23.75 - 22.5
22.5 - 21.25
21.25 - 20
20 - 18.75
18.75 - 17.5
17.5 - 16.25
16.25 - 15
15 - 13.75
13.75 - 12.5
12.5 - 11.25
11.25 - 10
HSS12.75x.375 25.00 0.00 13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
346 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 12 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Size L
ft
Lu
ft
Kl/r A Pu
K
Pn Ratio
Pu
in2 K Pn
10 - 8.75
8.75 - 7.5
7.5 - 6.25
6.25 - 5
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
13.5967
-1.78
-1.86
-1.93
-2.76
-2.98
-3.06
-3.14
-3.21
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
513.95
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
5 - 3.75
3.75 - 2.5
2.5 - 1.25
1.25 - 0
*Refer to Mathcad Calculations for Section
Capacity
Pole Bending Design
Data Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Size Mux Mnx Ratio
Mux
Muy Mny Ratio
Muy
Mny
kip-ft kip-ft M kip-ft kip-ft
nx
L1
L2
27.8 - 26.4
26.4 - 25
P 3.5 STD 0.12
0.73 2.57
3.45 4.88
6.31 7.73
9.16 10.59
12.02 14.09
16.16 18.28
20.40 22.51
24.63 26.74
29.70 32.30
34.91 37.51
40.11 8.46
8.46 0.014
0.086
0.015
0.020
0.029
0.037
0.046
0.054
0.063
0.071
0.083
0.096
0.108
0.121
0.133
0.146
0.158
0.176
0.191
0.206
0.222
0.237
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
8.46 8.46
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
25 - 23.75
23.75 - 22.5
22.5 - 21.25
21.25 - 20
20 - 18.75
18.75 - 17.5
17.5 - 16.25
16.25 - 15
15 - 13.75
13.75 - 12.5
12.5 - 11.25
11.25 - 10
10 - 8.75
HSS12.75x.375 169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
169.11
8.75 - 7.5
7.5 - 6.25
6.25 - 5
5 - 3.75
3.75 - 2.5
2.5 - 1.25
1.25 - 0
*Refer to Mathcad Calculations for Section
Capacity
Pole Shear Design
Data Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Size Actual
Vu
K
Vn Ratio
Vu
Actual
Tu
kip-ft
Tn Ratio
Tu
K Tn V kip-ft
n
L1
L2
27.8 - 26.4
26.4 - 25
P 3.5 STD 0.18
0.42 0.68
0.76 1.14
1.14 1.14
1.14 25.32
25.32 0.007
0.017
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
8.40 8.40
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
25 - 23.75
23.75 - 22.5
22.5 - 21.25
21.25 - 20
20 - 18.75
18.75 - 17.5
HSS12.75x.375 154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
347 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 13 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Size Actual
Vu
K
Vn Ratio
Vu
Actual
Tu
kip-ft
Tn Ratio
Tu
K Tn V kip-ft
n
17.5 - 16.25
16.25 - 15
15 - 13.75
13.75 - 12.5
12.5 - 11.25
11.25 - 10
10 - 8.75
8.75 - 7.5
7.5 - 6.25
6.25 - 5
1.14 1.14
1.65 1.69
1.69 1.69
1.69 1.69
1.69 1.91
2.09 2.09
2.08 2.08
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
154.19
0.007
0.007
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.012
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
168.10
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5 - 3.75
3.75 - 2.5
2.5 - 1.25
1.25 - 0
*Refer to Mathcad Calculations for Section
Capacity
Pole Interaction Design
Data Section
No.
Elevation Ratio
Pu
Ratio
Mux
Ratio
Muy
Ratio
Vu
Ratio
Tu
Tn
Comb.
Stress
Ratio
Allow.
Stress
Ratio
Criteria
ft Pn Mnx Mny Vn
L1 27.8 - 26.4 0.002
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.014
0.086
0.015
0.020
0.029
0.037
0.046
0.054
0.063
0.071
0.083
0.096
0.108
0.121
0.133
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
0.017
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.016
0.090
0.016
0.022
0.031
0.039
0.048
0.056
0.065
0.074
0.086
0.099
0.111
0.124
0.137
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 26.4 - 25
25 - 23.75
23.75 - 22.5
22.5 - 21.25
21.25 - 20
20 - 18.75
18.75 - 17.5
17.5 - 16.25
16.25 - 15
15 - 13.75
13.75 - 12.5
12.5 - 11.25
11.25 - 10
10 - 8.75
L2
348 of 642
Page
Date
tnxTowe
r
Job
ExtenetGlendale 14 of 14
PolesPhs2 Project
Client
NB+C
6095 Marshalee
Dr.
VZ22-01389H29
Raycap
(100111)
08:13:04
Elkridge, MD 21075 12/13/22
Phone: (410) 712-
7092
FAX:
Designed by
isuppo
Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Ratio
Pu
Ratio
Mux
Ratio
Muy
Ratio
Vu
Ratio
Tu
Tn
Comb.
Stress
Ratio
Allow.
Stress
Ratio
Criteria
Pn Mnx Mny Vn
8.75 - 7.5
7.5 - 6.25
6.25 - 5
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.146
0.158
0.176
0.191
0.206
0.222
0.237
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
0.011
0.012
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.149
0.162
0.181
0.197
0.213
0.228
0.244
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 4.8.2
4.8.2 5 - 3.75
3.75 - 2.5
2.5 - 1.25
1.25 - 0
*Refer to Mathcad Calculations for Section
Capacity
Section Capacity
Table
Section
No.
Elevation
ft
Component
Type
Size Critical
Element
P
K
øPallow
K
% Pass
Capacity Fail
*L1
*L2
27.8 - 25
25 - 0
Pole
Pole
P 3.5 STD
HSS12.75x.375
1 2
-0.33
-3.21
84.41 513.95
9.0 24.4
Pass
Pass
Summary
Pole (L2) 24.4 Pass
RATING = 24.4 Pass
*Refer to Mathcad Calculations for Section
Capacity
Program Version 8.1.1.0 - 6/3/2021 File:R:/Blue Bell/Projects/Stealth Structural Design (26702)/ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
(VZ22-01389H-29)/Structural/25ft/Analysis/tnx/ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2.eri 349 of 642
Monopole Base Plate
Connection
Site Info
Client
Site Name xtenetGlendale
PolesPh
Foundation Type
Raycap
Analysis Considerations
TIA-222 Revision
Grout
Considered:
Iar (in)
H
No
1.5 Applied Loads
Moment (kip-ft)
Axial Force (kips)
Shear Force
(kips)
40.11 3.21
2.08 Connection
Properties
Analysis
Results Anchor Rod Data
(4) 1-1/4" ø bolts (F1554-55 N; Fy=55 ksi, Fu=75 ksi)
on 17" BC
Anchor Rod
Summary
Pu_c = 29.06
Vu = 0.52
(units of kips, kipin)
Stress Rating
47.9%
φPn_c = 60.75
φVn = 27.34
Base Plate Data Mu = n/a φMn = n/a Pass
21" OD x 1.25" Plate (A36; Fy=36 ksi,
Fu=58 ksi) Base Plate Summary
Max Stress (ksi):
Allowable Stress
(ksi):
Stress Rating:
Stiffener Data 12.27
32.4 37.9%
(Roark's Flexural)
(8) 6"H x 3"W x 0.5"T, Notch:
0.5"
plate: Fy= 36 ksi ; weld: Fy= 70
ksi
horiz. weld: 0.1875" fillet
vert. weld: 0.1875" fillet
Pass
Stiffener Summary
Horizontal Weld:
Vertical Weld:
Plate
Flexure+Shear:
Plate
Tension+Shear:
Plate Compression:
Pole Summary
43.8%
23.4%
9.6%
22.6%
30.0%
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pole Data
12.75" x 0.349" round pole (A500-42; Fy=42 ksi,
Fu=58 ksi)
Punching Shear: 7.0% Pass
CCIplate - Version
3.7.2 Analysis Date:
12/13/2022
350 of 642
Monopole Flange Plate
Connection
Elevation = 25
ft. BU # Applied Loads
Site Name xtenetGlendale
PolesPh
Order #
Moment (kip-ft)
Axial Force (kips)
Shear Force
(kips)
0.73 0.33
0.42 TIA-222 Revision H
Top Plate -
External
Bottom Plate -
Internal
Connection Properties
Bolt Data
(4) 3/4" ø bolts (A325 N; Fy=92 ksi, Fu=120 ksi) on
6.5" BC
Top Plate Data Bottom Plate
9" OD x 1" Plate (A36; Fy=36 ksi, Data
Fu=58 ksi)
2" ID x 1" Plate (A36; Fy=36 ksi,
Fu=58 ksi)
Top Stiffener
Data
Bottom Stiffener
N/A Data N/A
Top Pole Data Bottom Pole
4" x 0.226" round pole (A53-B35; Fy=35 ksi, Data
Fu=60 ksi)
12.75" x 0.349" round pole (A500-42; Fy=42 ksi,
Fu=58 ksi)
Analysis Results
Bolt Capacity
Max Load (kips) 1.25
Allowable (kips)
Stress Rating:
30.06 4.2% Pass
Top Plate
Capacity
Bottom Plate
Max Stress (ksi): Capacity
Allowable Stress
(ksi):
Stress Rating:
1.38 32.40
4.3%
1.5%
(Flexural) Max Stress (ksi):
Allowable Stress
(ksi):
Stress Rating:
1.66 32.40
5.1%
N/A
(Flexural)
Pass
Pass
Pass
Tension Side Stress
Rating:
Tension Side Stress
Rating:
CCIplate - Version
3.7.2 Analysis Date:
12/13/2022
351 of 642
Drilled Pier
Foundation
BU # :
Site Name: ExtenetGlendale
PolesP
Order Number:
TIA-222
Revison:
Tower Type:
H
Monopole
Analysis Results
Compression
Check Limitation
Apply TIA-222-H Section
15.5:
N/A
Applied Loads
Comp.
40.11 Soil Lateral Check
Dv=0 (ft from TOC)
Uplift
-
-
-
Uplift 2.54
1.89 45.28
Moment (kip-ft)
Axial Force
(kips)
Shear Force
(kips)
Soil Safety Factor
Max Moment (kipft)
Rating
Shear Design
Options
Check Shear along Depth of
Pier:
Utilize Shear-Friction
Methodology:
3.21 2.08 70.3%
Compression
14.34 -
Soil Vertical
Check
Uplift
-
-
-
-
-
Go to Soil
Material Calculations
Properties
Skin Friction
(kips)
End Bearing (kips)
Concrete Strength,
f'c:
Rebar Strength,
Fy:
Tie Yield Strength,
Fyt:
3.5 ksi
60 ksi
40 ksi
28.86 Weight of Concrete
(kips)
Total Capacity
(kips)
Axial (kips)
9.53 43.20
12.74 Pier Design
Data
Depth
Ext. Above Grade
Rating 26.8%
Compression
2.54 Rebar & Pier -
Options
Embedded Pole
Inputs
Belled Pier Inputs
8 ft
0 ft
Reinforced Concrete Flexure
Critical Depth (ft from
TOC)
Critical Moment (kipft)
Critical Moment
Capacity
Rating
Reinforced Concrete Shear
Critical Depth (ft from
TOC)
Critical Shear
(kip)
Uplift
-
-
-
Pier Section 1 45.28
713.56
6.3%
From 0' below grade to 8' below
grade Pier Diameter
Rebar Quantity
Rebar Size
3.5 ft
12 -
Compression
5.69 Uplift
8 3 in
4 -
-
-
-
Clear Cover to
Ties
Tie Size
16.81 301.85
5.6%
Critical Shear
Capacity
Rating
Tie Spacing 3 in Shear-Friciton Methodology is
Applied
Soil Interaction
Rating
Structural Foundation
Rating
70.3%
6.3%
Soil Profile
Groundwater
Depth
2 # of Layers 3
Calculated Calculated Ultimate Skin Ult. Gross
Bearing SPT
Blow
Capacity
(ksf)
Angle of
Friction
(degrees)
Ultimate Skin
Friction Uplift
Override (ksf)
Top
(ft)
Bottom
(ft)
Thickness
(ft)
γ
soil
(pcf)
γ
concrete
(pcf)
Cohesion
(ksf)
Ultimate Skin Ultimate Skin Friction
Comp Layer Soil Type Friction Comp Friction
Uplift
(ksf) (ksf)
0.000
0.000
Override
(ksf)
Count
1 2
3 0
1 2
1 2
8 1
1 6
110
110
47.6 150
150
87.6 Cohesionless
Cohesionless
10 Cohesionless
0.000
0.290
0.000
0 30 0.290 4
Version 4.1.2
352 of 642
Embedded Pole
Foundation
BU # :
Site Name: ExtenetGlendale Poles
Phas
TIA-222 Revison: Order Number:
H
Check
Tower Type: Limitation
Monopole
Apply TIA-222-H Section
15.5: N/A
Analysis Results
Compression
Additional Longitudinal
Rebar
Input Effective Depths (else
Actual):
Applied Loads Soil Lateral Check
Dv=0 (ft from TOC)
Uplift
-
-
-
Comp.
40.11 Uplift 2.54
1.89 45.28
Shear Design
Moment (kip-ft) Options
Axial Force
(kips)
Shear Force
(kips)
Soil Safety
Factor
Max Moment (kipft)
Rating
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.21 2.08 70.3%
Compression
14.34 -
Soil Vertical
Check
Uplift
-
-
-
-
-
Go to Soil
Material Properties Calculations
Concrete Strength, f'c:
3.5 ksi
Skin Friction
(kips)
End Bearing (kips)
Weight of Concrete
(kips)
Total Capacity
(kips)
Axial (kips)
28.86 9.05
43.20 12.26
Pier Design
Data
Depth
Ext. Above Grade
Rebar & Pier Options
Embedded Pole
Inputs
Belled Pier Inputs
Rating 28.4%
Compression
2.54 -
8 ft
0 ft
Embedded Pole Interaction
Critical Depth (ft from
TOC)
Critical Moment (kipft)
Critical Moment
Capacity
Rating
Uplift
-
-
-
-
Pier Section 1 45.28
106.51
43.9%
From 0' below grade to 8' below
Pier Diameter grade 3.5 ft
Reinforced Concrete
Shear
Clear Cover to
Ties
Tie Size
3 in
4 Tie Spacing 12 in
Rebar
Quantity Structural Foundation
Rating
Soil Interaction
Rating
43.9%
70.3%
Soil Profile
Groundwater
Depth
2 # of Layers 3
Calculated Calculated Ultimate Skin Ult. Gross
Bearing
Capacity
(ksf)
Angle of
Friction
(degrees)
Ultimate Skin
Friction Uplift
Override (ksf)
Top
(ft)
Thickness
(ft)
γ
soil
(pcf)
γ
concrete
(pcf)
Cohesion
(ksf)
Ultimate Skin Ultimate Skin Friction
Comp
SPT Blow
Count Layer Bottom (ft) Soil Type Friction Comp Friction Uplift
(ksf) (ksf)
0.000
0.000
Override
(ksf)
1 2
3 0
1 2
1 2
8 1
1 6
110
110
47.6 150
150
87.6 Cohesionless
Cohesionless
10 Cohesionless
0.000
0.290
0.000
30 0.290 4
Version 5.0.3
353 of 642
SUPPLEMENTAL EMBEDDED POLE
REPORT
BU # :
Site Name: ExtenetGlendale Poles
Phase 2
Order Number:
Embedded Pole
Encased in Properties
Concrete:
Number of
Sides:
Yield Strength
(ksi):
Thickness
(in):
No
0 42
0.349
Bend Radius (in):
0.5235
Taper Factor (in/ft):
0.0000 Maximum Axial
Depth from Grade Rating
(ft):
Diameter (in):
8.00 10.19
Axial Demand 5.93
Axial Capacity (kip): (kip):
407.65
Rating: 1.5%
Maximum Flexural
Depth from Grade Rating
(ft):
Diameter (in):
Flexural Demand (kipft):
2.54 10.19
45.28 Flexural Capacity (kip-ft):
106.51
Rating:
Maximum Interaction 42.5%
Depth from Grade Rating
(ft):
Diameter (in):
2.54 10.19
Axial Demand 5.70
Axial Capacity (kip): (kip):
407.65
Flexural Demand (kip-ft):
45.28 Flexural Capacity (kip-ft):
106.51
Rating:
43.9%
Structural
Rating:
43.9%
Version 5.0.3
354 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
2 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Wind Load per 2018
IBCLocation:
Risk category:
ANSI / TIA-222-
H
Table 2-1
II
Importance
factor:
Exposure:
I := 1.0 Table 2-3
Exp := "C"
Kzt := 1.0
Ke := 1.0
Kd := 0.95
G := 1.1
V := 95
Section 2.6.5
Section 2.6.6.2
Section 2.6.8
Table 2-2
Topographic factor:
Ground Elevation
factor:
Wind directional factor:
Gust response factor:
Basic wind speed:
Equipment Height (ft):
Section 2.6.9
mph Section 2.6.4
z := 25ft
Nominal Height of the
Atmospheric Boundary
Layer:
zg := 1200ft if Exp = "B"
= 274.32
900ft if Exp = "C"
Table 2-4
700ft if Exp =
"D"
3-Sec Gust-Speed Power
Law
Exponent:
α := 7 if Exp =
"B"
9.5 if Exp =
"C"
= 9.5
11.5 if Exp =
"D"
2 α
Velocity Pressure max 15ft, x)
Exposure
Coefficients:
( Section 2.6.5.2
Section 2.6.11.6
K(x)
:= 2.01
zg
Velocity Pressure: q(x) := Kz
K(x) 2
q 0.00256K K K K V
psf
x z zt e d
Atmospheric Ice Loads on Pole Per TIA-222-H
(2.6.10) Nominal Ice
Thickness:
t := 0in
0.1 z
Height Factor: k :=
iz
= 0.973 < 1.4
33ft
Importance
Factor:
Ii := 1.0
t := tI k K
iz zt
Table 2-3
0.35 Design Ice
Thickness: d i = 0in
Ice Density: ρi := 56pcf
Vi Design Wind Speed on Ice: := 30
Wind on Ice Velocity Pressure
(psf):
2 qhi i:= 0.00256K(z)K K I V
psf
zt d i
qzi := qhi
= 2.07psf
355 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
3 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Force Coefficient for
Pole:
Table 2-8b
D in ft
)0.5 d
Cp(d, shape) := C ( K V
K(z)K
r zt e
12in
C18
1.2 if Cr
39
16.6 if 39 < Cr Cr < 78
0.717
0.73 if Cr
> 78
1.2 if Cr 39
14.4 C16
if 39 < Cr Cr < 78
.678
0.75 if Cr
> 78
1.2 if Cr 39
4.12 C12
if 39 < Cr Cr < 78
0.337
0.95 if Cr
> 78 C8 1.2 if Cr 39
1.2 if 39 < Cr
< 78
1.2 if Cr > 78
C0 1.2 if Cr
39
46.8 if 39 < Cr Cr < 78
1 0.60 if Cr > 78
return C18 if shape =
18 return C16 if shape =
16 return C12 if shape =
12 return C8 if shape = 8
return C0 if shape = 0
Design Wind
Force: Ff
(app , l , d , type, shape) := [q(z)GCf(l , d , type)(ld)] if app = "antenna"
[q(z)GCp(d, shape)(ld)] if app =
"pole"
356 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
4 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Top Pole
Capacity
ϕc := 0.9
resistance factor for axial
compression
resistance factor for flexure
Section 4.8.2
ϕf := 0.9
ϕv := 0.9 resistance facture for
shear
resistance factor for
torsion
ϕT := 0.95
fy D
F shape ( , f , D , t ), E
:= F18
1.27fy y yif < 0.759
E t
f f
y D
y D
1.56f 1.0
- 0.245
if 0.759 <
if 0.836 <
if 0.992 <
y
< 2.14 E t E t
fy D
F16 1.27fy if < 0.836
E t
f
f
y
1.578f 1.0
- 0.233
y
D
D
< 2.14
< 2.14
y
E t E t
fy D
F12 1.26fy if < 0.992
E t
f f
y D
y D
1.611f 1.0
- 0.220
y
E t E t
fy D
F8 1.24fy
if
< 1.10
E t
f
f
y
D
y
D
if 1.10 <
1.578f 1.0 < 2.14
- 0.194
y
E t E t
D E
fy
F0 fy if < 0.114
t
0.0379E 2 E D E
+ f if
0.114
y < < 0.448 D 3
f
y t
f
y
fy
t
E E D
t
0.337
if 0.448 < < 300 D
f
y
t
return F18 if shape =
18 return F16 if shape =
16 return F12 if shape =
12 return F8 if shape = 8
return F0 if shape = 0
357 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
5 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
CALCULATE LOADS ON EQUIPMENTAND
SUPPORT
Radome: Dimensions: h := 33.25in w := 16in d := 16in
Cross Section
Type:
type := app := side :=
( )
F app , h , w , type, side
= 42.2lbf
f
Front Wind
Load:
1 ( ( F app , h , w, type, side ))
= 11.4psf
f
hw
Antenna:
Dimensions: h := 20in
type :=
w := 8in
app :=
d := 5in
Cross Section
Type:
side :=
( )
F app , h , w , type, side
= 30.4lbf
f
Front Wind
Load:
Side Wind
Load:
( )
=
F app h d type
side
, , , , 20.1lbf f
Total Wind
Load:
:=
Wtotal 32.1lbf 21.1lbf
53.2lbf
+ =
Light Arm:
Dimensions: h := 72in
type :=
w := 2.375in
app :=
d := 2.375in
Cross Section
Type:
side :=
( )
F app , h , w , type, side
= 32.5lbf
f
Front Wind
Load: 1
( ( F app , h , w , type, side ))
= 5.4plf
f
h
Light:
Dimensions:
Cross Section
Type:
h := 1.5ft
type :=
w := 1.5ft
app :=
W1 := 70lbf
side :=
( )
F app , h , w , type, side
= 61.6lbf
f
Front Wind
Load:
358 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
6 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Base Pole
Capacity Effective Yield Stress fo 12" STD pipe
Members fy := 42ksi minimum yield strength of
steel E
:= 29000ksi
D := 12.75in
t := 0.349in
modulus of
elasticity diameter of base
module
design wall thickness
Section Properties from CAD at base
plate
A := 10.7924in2
c := 6.2961in
I
:= 207.6563in4
x
area of cross
section distance from neutral axis to
edge
Moment of Inertia along X axis
I
:= 207.6563in4 Moment of Inertia along Z
axis
Polar moment of Inertia
z
4 J := I + I
= 415.31in
x z
I
x
S := = 32.98in3
Section Modulus
c
A
At := Area in compression and
2 tension
Ac := At
for constant yielding stress from CAD
Distance of neutral axis fro area in
tension
Distance of neutral axis fro area in
compression
Plastic Section Modulus
dt := 4.1072in
dc := 4.1072in
Z := A d + A d
c
t t c
Z
= 44.33in3
side := 0
torsional
constant
m(side):= 1.58 if side Table 4-9
18
1.59 if side
16
1.61 if side
12
1.66 if side 8
1.57 if side 0
C := m(side)t(D
- t)2
C t
= 89.094in3
Ltp := z height of pole
structre
359 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
7 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Forces on the
pole
Mu := 40.11kipft
Pu := 3.21kip
flexural moment due to factored loads
axial compressive loads due to factored
loads
transverse shear due to factored loads
torsion due to factored loads
Vu := 2.08kip
Tu := 0kipft
Design Strength Section 4.8.2
P := F side ( , f , D , )t , E A
= 453.3kip
nominal axial compressive
strength n y y
A
2 Section 4.8.2.1/4.8.2.2 Vn (shape) := Fside 0.6 F side ( , f ) , D, t , E
y y
1.60E 0.78E
3 F ( ) round 0.5Amin0.6F side , f , D , t , E
, max
y y
,
5
2
4 D
L p D
t
D t
return Fround if shape
= 0
return Fside
otherwise nominal shear
strength V := V (side)
= 136.0kip
n n
( )
t
Tn (shape) := Fside 0.6 F side , f
, D , t , E C
y y Section 4.8.2.1/4.8.2.2
1.23E 0.6E F ( ) round C min0.6F side , f , D , t , E , max
t y y
, 3
5 2 4 D
L p D
t
D t
return Fround if shape
= 0
return Fside
otherwise
T := T (side)
= 187.1kipft
nominal torsional
strength n n
360 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
8 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
( ) F
side F side , f , D , t , E
S
y y
Mn(shape) :=
Section 4.7.2/4.7.3
Tu
Fround F side ( , f , D , t ), E S
if
y y > 0.2
ϕTTn
Tu
if < 0.2
ϕTTn
D E
fy
fyZ if < 0.0714
t
0.0207E E D
t
E
+ 1
f S if
0.0714
y < < 0.309 D
f
y
f
y
f y
t
E E D
t
0.330
S if
0.309
< < 300 D
f
y
t
return Fround if side =
0 return Fside
otherwise
M := M (side)
= 155.1kipft
nominal flexural
stength n n
Combined Bending and Axial
Foces
2 Pu Mu Vu Tu
+ + + = 29.5 %
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
n
ϕ
P ϕM ϕV ϕ
T
c n f n v n T
361 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
9 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Base Pole
Capacity Effective Yield Stress fo 12" STD pipe
Members fy := 42ksi minimum yield strength of
steel E
:= 29000ksi
D := 12.75in
t := 0.349in
modulus of elasticity
diameter of base
module
design wall thickness
Reinforcement
3.5x0.5 A36
Plates
Section Properties from CAD for Cut Out w/
Reinforcement
A
:= 12.17in2
c := 5.0604in
area of cross
section distance from neutral axis to
edge
I
:= 107.02in4 Moment of Inertia along X
axis
Moment of Inertia along Z
axis
Polar moment of Inertia
Section Modulus
x
I
:= 304.98in4
z 4
J := I + I
= 412.00in
x z
I
x
S := = 21.15in3
c
A
At := Area in compression and
2 tension
Ac := At
for constant yielding stress from CAD
Distance of neutral axis fro area in
tension
Distance of neutral axis fro area in
compression
Plastic Section Modulus
dt := 3.23in
dc := 2.02in
Z := A d + A d
c
t t c
Z
= 31.95in3
side := 0
torsional
constant
m(side):= 1.58 if side Table 4-9
18
1.59 if side
16
1.61 if side
12
1.66 if side 8
1.57 if side 0
C := m(side)t(D
- t)2
C t
= 89.094in3
Ltp := z height of pole
structre
362 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
10 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Forces on the
pole
Mu := 34.91kipft
Pu := 3.06kip
flexural moment due to factored loads
axial compressive loads due to factored
loads
transverse shear due to factored loads
torsion due to factored loads
Vu := 2.09kip
Tu := 0kipft
Design Strength Section 4.8.2
P := F side ( , f , D , )t , E A
= 511.1kip
nominal axial compressive
strength n y y
Section 4.8.2.1/4.8.2.2
A
2 Vn (shape) := Fside 0.6 F side ( , f )
, D, t , E
y y
1.60E 0.78E
3 F ( ) round 0.5Amin0.6F side , f , D , t , E
, max
y y
,
5
2
4 D
L p D
t
D t
return Fround if shape
= 0
return Fside
otherwise nominal shear
V := V (side) strength
= 153.3kip
n n
( )
t
Tn (shape) := Fside 0.6 F side , f
, D , t , E C
y y Section 4.8.2.1/4.8.2.2
1.23E 0.6E F ( ) round C min0.6F side , f , D , t , E , max
t y y
, 3
5 2 4 D
L p D
t
D t
return Fround if shape
= 0
return Fside
otherwise nominal torsional
T := T (side) strength
= 187.1kipft
n n
363 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
11 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
( ) F
side F side , f , D , t , E
S
y y
Mn(shape) :=
Section 4.7.2/4.7.3
Tu
Fround F side ( , f , D , t ), E S
if
y y > 0.2
ϕTTn
Tu
if < 0.2
ϕTTn
D E
fy
fyZ if < 0.0714
t
0.0207E E D
t
E
+ 1
f S if
0.0714
y < < 0.309 D
f
y
f
y
fy
t
E E D
t
0.330
S if
0.309
< < 300 D
f
y
t
return Fround if side =
0 return Fside
otherwise M := M (side)
= 111.8kipft
nominal flexural
stength n n
Combined Bending and Axial
Foces
2 Pu Mu Vu Tu
+ + + = 35.4 %
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
n
ϕ
P ϕM ϕV ϕ
T
c n f n v n T
364 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
12 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Weld Check for Poles :
Forces on the pole at base
plate
Mu := 40.1kipft
flexural moment due to factored loads
axial compressive loads due to factored
loads
transverse shear due to factored loads
torsion due to factored loads
Pu := 3.21kip
Vu := 2.08kip
Tu := 0kipft
Weld Properties:
Weld Shear
Strength:
Resistance Factor:
Diameter of Pole:
Thickness of Fillet:
fw := 0.670ksi
ϕ := 0.75
D := 10.19in
t := 0.3125in
Throat: a := .707t
= 0.22in Aw := 48ina = 7.07in2
Iw := 207.6563in4
= 207.66in4
Weld ThroatArea:
Weld Moment of
Inertia:
Jw := 2Iw
= 415.31in
Weld Polar Moment of 4
Inertia:
Stress Due to Axial:
Pu
sa := = 0.45ksi
Aw
D
M
u 2
Stress Due to
Moment:
Stress Due to Shear:
sm :=
sv :=
= 11.81ksi I
w
Vu
= 0.29ksi
Aw
D
T
u 2
Stress Due to
Torque:
Max Stress:
st := = 0.00ksi J
w
( )
2 ( )
2 sa + sm + s + s
= 12.26ksi
t
Max := v
Ultimate Stress:
Max
ϕfw
= 31.5ksi
DCratio := = 38.9%
ϕfw
Hence := "O.K" if DCratio < 1
"NOT O.K" if DCratio
> 1
Hence
= "O.K"
365 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
13 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Weld Check for
Poles : Forces on the pole at flange base
plate Mu
:= 40.1kipft
Pu := 3.21kip
Vu := 2.08kip
Tu := 0kipft
flexural moment due to factored loads
axial compressive loads due to factored
loads
transverse shear due to factored loads
torsion due to factored loads Weld Properties:
Weld Shear
Strength:
Resistance Factor:
Diameter of Pole:
Thickness of Fillet:
Groove Depth:
fw := 0.670ksi
ϕ := 0.75
D := 12.75in
t := 0.3125in
gd := 0.25in
2
1 8
a := t
2 + gd - in
= 0.34in
Throat:
Aw := 48ina
= 10.77in
Weld 2
ThroatArea: Iw := 207.6563in4
= 207.66in
Weld Moment of 4
Inertia:
Jw := 2Iw
= 415.31in
Weld Polar Moment of 4
Inertia:
Stress Due to Axial:
Pu
sa := = 0.30ksi
Aw
D
M
u 2
Stress Due to
Moment:
Stress Due to Shear:
sm :=
sv :=
= 14.77ksi I
w
Vu
= 0.19ksi
Aw
D
T
u 2
Stress Due to
Torque:
Max Stress:
st := = 0.00ksi J
w
( )
2 ( )
2 sa + sm + s + s
= 15.07ksi
t
Max := v
Ultimate Stress:
Max
ϕfw
= 31.5ksi
DCratio := = 47.8%
ϕfw
Hence := "O.K" if DCratio < 1
"NOT O.K" if DCratio
> 1
Hence
= "O.K"
366 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
14 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Weld Check at
Topϕ := 0.75
Forces on the pole at
Top
Mu := 0.73kipft
Pu := 0.33kip
flexural moment due to factored loads
axial compressive loads due to factored
loads
transverse shear due to factored loads
torsion due to factored loads
Vu := 0.42kip
Tu := 0kipft
L := 3.5in
Mu Maximum Tension force (in Ydirection)
Pmax := Pu + Pmax
= 1017.1lbf
Vmax = 420.0lbf
D
Tu
D
Maximum Shear at each
bolt
Weld size:(1/16 of an in):
Weld Length
Vmax := Vu +
Dw := 4in
l := L
= 3.5in
Weld Strength Fexx := 70ksi
Dw
16 := ϕ 0.6Fexx.707 l = 19.487ki
p
Weld Strength Rn
Pmax
DCratio := = 5.2%
Rn
Hence := "O.K" if DCratio < 1
"NOT O.K" if DCratio
> 1
Hence
= "O.K"
367 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
15 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Weld Check for Poles :
Forces on the pole at Light
Arm
Mu := .92kipft
flexural moment due to factored loads
axial compressive loads due to factored
loads
transverse shear due to factored loads
torsion due to factored loads
Pu := 0.15kip
Vu := 0.15kip
Tu := 0kipft
Weld Properties:
Weld Shear
Strength:
Resistance Factor:
Diameter of Pole:
fw := 0.670ksi
ϕ := 0.75
D := 2.375in
Thickness of Fillet: t := .1875in
Throat: a := .707t
= 0.13in Aw := 48ina = 4.24in2
Iw := 207.6563in4
= 207.66in4
Weld ThroatArea:
Weld Moment of
Inertia:
Jw := 2Iw
= 415.31in
Weld Polar Moment of 4
Inertia:
Pu
Stress Due to
Axial:
sa := = 0.04ksi
Aw
D
M
u 2
Stress Due to
Moment:
Stress Due to Shear:
sm :=
sv :=
= 0.06ksi I
w
Vu
= 0.04ksi
Aw
D
T
u 2
Stress Due to
Torque:
Max Stress:
st := = 0.00ksi J
w
( )
2 ( )
2 sa + sm + s + s
= 0.10ksi
t
Max := v
Ultimate Stress:
Max
ϕfw
= 31.5ksi
DCratio := = 0.3%
ϕfw
Hence := "O.K" if DCratio < 1
"NOT O.K" if DCratio
> 1
Hence
= "O.K"
368 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
16 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Bolt Check at Light
Arm1/2" A325 Bolts
F
nt := 90ksi
Fnv := 54ksi
Db := 6.25in
Table J3.2
Table J3.2
(A325 Bolts)
Bolt Diameter: :=
:=
d
n
0.5in
Number of 1
Bolts:
BoltArea: d2
Ab := π
= 0.196in2
4 F A
= 17.671kip
nt b
FnvAb
= 10.603kip
Max Load from RISA 3D using LRFD Load
Combinations :
FT1 := 143lbf
FV1 := 146lbf
FV2 := 105lbf
MT := 918lbfft
F
T := F
T1
MT
FV := FV1
2 + FV2
2 + = 1942.4lbf
= 25.5%
Db
ϕ := 0.75
FT FV
ϕFnvAb n
+ <100% OK AY
ϕF nt A b n
369 of 642
NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite
300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation
Sheet
17 Date:
12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale
PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111
Raycap|Stealth
®
Design Port Hole Reinforcement for 4"x8"
Opening: Yield Strength of Pole:
Yield Strength of Rein forceme nt:
Bottom Section of Monopole
Properties
Outside Diameter
Fy := 42ksi
Fyr := 46ksi
OD
:= 12.75in Thickness: t := .375in
Inside Diameter: ID := OD - 2t
= 12in
Port Holes
Ap := 4int
= 1.5in2
Ap Fy
Area of Pole Removed:
RequiredArea of
Reinforcement: Ar := = 1.37in2
F
yr
OD Radius of
Section:
r := = 6.375in
2 Thickness of
Reinforcement
tr := 0.375in
Aract > Ar
Aract := 22.5int
= 1.875in2 r OK
A F 0.5(OD
- t)
p y Minimum distance from centerline
of
section to centerline of
Reinforcement:
Xr := A = 4.52in
ractFyr
0.5in Xract := + r
= 6.625in
Xract > Xr OK
2 370 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap SK-1
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Rendered Light Arm.r3d
371 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap
Shapes
SK-2
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Light Arm.r3d
372 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap
Dead
SK-1
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Light Arm.r3d
373 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap
Wind X
SK-2
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Light Arm.r3d
374 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap
Wind Z
SK-3
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Light Arm.r3d
375 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap
Bending
SK-6
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Light Arm.r3d
376 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap
Shear
SK-7
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Light Arm.r3d
377 of 642
NB+C ES
IAS
Raycap SK-8
Dec 15, 2022
100111 Plate Stress Light Arm.r3d
378 of 642
Company
Designer
: NB+C ES
: IAS
12/15/2022
2:54:02 PM
Job Number :
100111
Model Name :
Raycap
Checked By :
__________
Node Boundary
Conditions Node Label
N11
X [k/in]
Reaction
Reaction
Y [k/in]
Reaction
Reaction
Z [k/in]
Reaction
Reaction
Y Rot [kft/rad]
Reaction
1 2 N14
Hot Rolled Steel
Properties Label
A992
A36 Gr.36
A572 Gr.50
E [ksi]
29000
29000
29000
G [ksi]
11154
11154
11154
11154
11154
11154
11154
450
Nu
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.3 0.35
0.2 Therm. Coeff.
[1e⁵°F⁻¹]
Density [k/ft³]
0.49 Yield [ksi]
50 Ry
1.1 1.5
1.1 1.4
1.4 1.6
1.4 1.5
1 Fu [ksi]
65 58
65 58
58 60
65 50
Rt
1 2
3 0.65
0.65 0.65
0.65 0.65
0.65 0.65
0.44 0.07
1.1 1.2
1.1 1.3
1.3 1.2
1.3 1.2
1.2 0.49
0.49 0.527
0.527
0.49 0.49
0.12 0.064
36 50
42 46
35 50
16.67 9.5
4 A500 Gr.B RND
29000
5 A500 Gr.B Rect
29000
6 7
8 9
A53 Gr.B
A1085
FRP
29000
29000
2800
ABS 297 77.8 9.5
Hot Rolled Steel Section
Sets Label
Light Arm
Channel
Shape
PIPE_2.0
PIPE_2.0
Type
Beam
Beam
Design List
Pipe
Material
A53 Gr.B
A53 Gr.B
Design Rule
Typical
Area [in²]
1.02 1.02
Iyy [in⁴]
0.627
0.627
Izz [in⁴]
0.627
0.627
J [in⁴]
1.25 1.25
1 2 Pipe Typical
Member Primary
DataLabel
M1
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M8A
I Node
N1
N1
N1
N1
N1
N28
N1
J Node Section/Shap
e
Light Arm
RIGID
Type Design List Material
A53 Gr.B
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
Design Rule
Typical
Typical
Typical
Typical
Typical
Typical
Typical
Typical
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
N2
N27
N30
N34
N37
N1
Beam
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Pipe
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
RIGID
N31
N47 N2
Member Advanced
Data Label Physical Deflection Ratio
Options
N/A
Seismic DR
1 M1 None
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M8A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 ** NA **
** NA **
** NA **
** NA **
** NA **
** NA **
** NA **
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Hot Rolled Steel Design
Parameters Label
M1
Shape
Light Arm
Length [in]
80.498
Lcomp top
[in]
Lbyy
Channel
Conn.
N/A
a [in]
N/A
Function
1 Lateral
RISA-3D Version
20 [ Light Arm.r3d
]