OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE EXPENSE
EWRF - GWP ADM (Elec. Works, Rev Fund)
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4505 41100 $ 96,305 LBRxAG 96,305 - - - - - - - 96,305 Overtime 5820-4505 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly 5820-4505 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4505 Various $ 23,662 LBRxAG 23,662 - - - - - - - 23,662 PERS Retirement 5820-4505 42700 $ 37,970 LBRxAG 37,970 - - - - - - - 37,970 PERS cost sharing 5820-4505 42701 $ (2,848) LBRxAG (2,848) - - - - - - - (2,848) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $155,089 $155,089 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,089 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4505 43110 $ 45,026 G-Gen 45,026 - - - - - - - 45,026 Advertising 5820-4505 44200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Postage 5820-4505 44450 $ 105 G-Gen 105 - - - - - - - 105 Travel 5820-4505 44550 $ 1,788 LBRxAG 1,788 - - - - - - - 1,788 Training 5820-4505 44650 $ 1,788 LBRxAG 1,788 - - - - - - - 1,788 Computer software 5820-4505 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Regulatory 5820-4505 44760 $ 1,577 G-Gen 1,577 - - - - - - - 1,577 Membership and dues 5820-4505 44800 $ 3,427 LBRxAG 3,427 - - - - - - - 3,427 Periodicals and newspapers 5820-4505 45050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Books 5820-4505 45100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Furniture and equipment 5820-4505 45150 $ 14,898 LBRxAG 14,898 - - - - - - - 14,898 Computer hardware 5820-4505 45170 $ 74 LBRxAG 74 - - - - - - - 74 Office supplies 5820-4505 45250 $ 2,235 LBRxAG 2,235 - - - - - - - 2,235 General supplies & COVID Supplies 5820-4505 45350 $ 526 G-Gen 526 - - - - - - - 526 Printing and graphics 5820-4505 45450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Uncollectible accounts 5820-4505 45680 $ 745 LBRxAG 745 - - - - - - - 745 Business meetings 5820-4505 45681 $ 745 LBRxAG 745 - - - - - - - 745 Miscellaneous 5820-4505 45682 $ 7,464 LBRxAG 7,464 - - - - - - - 7,464 Utilities 5820-4505 46005 $ 8,392 G-Gen 8,392 - - - - - - - 8,392 Cost allocation charge 5820-4505 46007 $ 603,665 G-Gen 603,665 - - - - - - - 603,665 Fleet equipment rental charge 5820-4505 46008 $ 155,517 LBRxAG 155,517 - - - - - - - 155,517 ISD service charge 5820-4505 46009 $ 375,323 G-Gen 375,323 - - - - - - - 375,323 Building maint service charge 5820-4505 46010 $ 192,539 G-Gen 192,539 - - - - - - - 192,539 Liability Insurance 5820-4505 46011 $ 5,156 LBRxAG 5,156 - - - - - - - 5,156 Excess insurance and surety 5820-4505 46012 $ 47,957 G-Gen 47,957 - - - - - - - 47,957 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $1,468,946 $1,468,946 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,468,946 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM $ $1,624,035 $1,624,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,624,035 $
EWRF - GWP ADM -Customer Service
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4509 41100 $ 3,003,022 C-Services 3,003,022 - - - - - - - 3,003,022 Overtime 5820-4509 41200 $ 47,611 C-Services 47,611 - - - - - - - 47,611 Hourly wages 5820-4509 41300 $ 75,687 C-Services 75,687 - - - - - - - 75,687 Benefits 5820-4509 Various $ 794,529 C-Services 794,529 - - - - - - - 794,529 PERS Retirement 5820-4509 42700 $ 1,214,817 C-Services 1,214,817 - - - - - - - 1,214,817 PERS cost sharing 5820-4509 42701 $ (91,107) C-Services (91,107) - - - - - - - (91,107) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $5,044,560 $5,044,560 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,044,560 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4509 43110 $ 1,769,327 C-Services 1,769,327 - - - - - - - 1,769,327 Postage 5820-4509 44450 $ 12,778 C-Services 12,778 - - - - - - - 12,778 Travel 5820-4509 44550 $ 8,254 C-Services 8,254 - - - - - - - 8,254 Training 5820-4509 44650 $ 10,682 C-Services 10,682 - - - - - - - 10,682 Regulatory 5820-4509 44760 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Membership and dues 5820-4509 44800 $ 586 C-Services 586 - - - - - - - 586 Furniture and equipment 5820-4509 45150 $ 10,116 C-Services 10,116 - - - - - - - 10,116 Computer hardware 5820-4509 45170 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4509 45250 $ 15,972 C-Services 15,972 - - - - - - - 15,972 Claims 5820-4509 45652 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Small tools 5820-4509 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4509 45350 $ 2,130 C-Services 2,130 274 of 895 - - - - - - - 2,130 Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Public benefit programs 5820-4509 45512 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Uncollectible accounts 5820-4509 45680 $ 2,026,630 C-Services 2,026,630 - - - - - - - 2,026,630 Business meetings 5820-4509 45681 $ 1,065 C-Services 1,065 - - - - - - - 1,065 Miscellaneous 5820-4509 45682 $ 1,597 C-Services 1,597 - - - - - - - 1,597 Cost allocation charge 5820-4509 46007 $ 994,366 C-Services 994,366 - - - - - - - 994,366 Fleet equipment rental charge 5820-4509 46008 $ 37,923 C-Services 37,923 - - - - - - - 37,923 ISD service charge 5820-4509 46009 $ 736,372 C-Services 736,372 - - - - - - - 736,372 Building maint service charge 5820-4509 46010 $ 550,182 C-Services 550,182 - - - - - - - 550,182 Liability Insurance 5820-4509 46011 $ 167,378 C-Services 167,378 - - - - - - - 167,378 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $6,345,356 $6,345,356 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,345,356 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM - Customer Service $ $11,389,916 $11,389,916 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,389,916 EWRF - GWP ADM - Conserv & Utility Modernization
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4520 41100 $ 400,250 C-Services 400,250 - - - - - - - 400,250 Overtime 5820-4520 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4520 41300 $ 124,614 C-Services 124,614 - - - - - - - 124,614 Benefits 5820-4520 Various $ 82,206 C-Services 82,206 - - - - - - - 82,206 PERS Retirement 5820-4520 42700 $ 207,871 C-Services 207,871 - - - - - - - 207,871 PERS cost sharing 5820-4520 42701 $ (15,596) C-Services (15,596) - - - - - - - (15,596) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $799,345 $799,345 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $799,345 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4520 43110 $ 3,270,256 C-Services 3,270,256 - - - - - - - 3,270,256 Repairs to equipment 5820-4520 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Advertising 5820-4520 44200 $ 20,976 C-Services 20,976 - - - - - - - 20,976 Postage 5820-4520 44450 $ 79,859 C-Services 79,859 - - - - - - - 79,859 Travel 5820-4520 44550 $ 6,229 C-Services 6,229 - - - - - - - 6,229 Laundry and towel service 5820-4520 44600 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4520 44650 $ 6,229 C-Services 6,229 - - - - - - - 6,229 Computer software 5820-4520 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Membership and dues 5820-4520 44800 $ 10,648 C-Services 10,648 - - - - - - - 10,648 Periodicals and newspapers 5820-4520 45050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Furniture and equipment 5820-4520 45150 $ 3,727 C-Services 3,727 - - - - - - - 3,727 Computer hardware 5820-4520 45170 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4520 45250 $ 4,259 C-Services 4,259 - - - - - - - 4,259 General supplies 5820-4520 45350 $ 10,648 C-Services 10,648 - - - - - - - 10,648 Printing and graphics 5820-4520 45450 $ 53,240 C-Services 53,240 - - - - - - - 53,240 Public benefit programs 5820-4520 45512 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Low carbon fuel std programs 5820-4520 45514 $ 1,929,742 C-Services 1,929,742 - - - - - - - 1,929,742 Business meetings 5820-4520 45681 $ 5,324 C-Services 5,324 - - - - - - - 5,324 Miscellaneous 5820-4520 45682 $ 29,282 C-Services 29,282 - - - - - - - 29,282 Liability Insurance 5820-4520 46011 $ 28,105 C-Services 28,105 - - - - - - - 28,105 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $5,458,524 $5,458,524 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,458,524 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM - Conserv & Utility Modernization $ $6,257,869 $6,257,869 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,257,869 EWRF - GWP ADM - Bus System Support
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4521 41100 $ 28,755 LBRxAG 28,755 - - - - - - - 28,755 Overtime 5820-4521 41200 $ 3,342 LBRxAG 3,342 - - - - - - - 3,342 Hourly wages 5820-4521 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4521 Various $ 6,816 LBRxAG 6,816 - - - - - - - 6,816 PERS retirement 5820-4521 42700 $ 11,374 LBRxAG 11,374 - - - - - - - 11,374 PERS cost sharing 5820-4521 42701 $ (854) LBRxAG (854) - - - - - - - (854) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $49,433 $49,433 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,433 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4521 43110 $ 280,207 G-Gen 280,207 - - - - - - - 280,207 Repairs to office equipment 5820-4521 44120 $ 1,788 LBRxAG 1,788 - - - - - - - 1,788 Data communication 5820-4521 44250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4521 44450 $ 112 LBRxAG 112 - - - - - - - 112 Travel 5820-4521 44550 $ 2,086 LBRxAG 2,086 - - - - - - - 2,086 Training 5820-4521 44650 $ 2,682 LBRxAG 2,682 - - - - - - - 2,682 Computer software 5820-4521 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Membership and dues 5820-4521 44800 $ 223 LBRxAG 223 275 of 895 - - - - - - - 223 Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Furniture and equipment 5820-4521 45150 $ 5,959 LBRxAG 5,959 - - - - - - - 5,959 Computer hardware 5820-4521 45170 $ 4,470 LBRxAG 4,470 - - - - - - - 4,470 Office supplies 5820-4521 45250 $ 447 LBRxAG 447 - - - - - - - 447 General supplies 5820-4521 45350 $ 2,086 LBRxAG 2,086 - - - - - - - 2,086 Business meetings 5820-4521 45681 $ 119 LBRxAG 119 - - - - - - - 119 Miscellaneous 5820-4521 45682 $ 2,235 LBRxAG 2,235 - - - - - - - 2,235 Liability Insurance 5820-4521 46011 $ 1,720 LBRxAG 1,720 - - - - - - - 1,720 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $304,132 $304,132 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $304,132 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM - Bus System Support $ $353,566 $353,566 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $353,566 EWRF - GWP ADM - Utility Finance
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4530 41100 $ 62,051 LBRxAG 62,051 - - - - - - - 62,051 Overtime 5820-4530 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4530 Various $ 16,349 LBRxAG 16,349 - - - - - - - 16,349 PERS retirement 5820-4530 42700 $ 24,545 LBRxAG 24,545 - - - - - - - 24,545 PERS cost sharing 5820-4530 42701 $ (1,841) LBRxAG (1,841) - - - - - - - (1,841) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $101,104 $101,104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,104 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4530 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4530 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Furniture and equipment 5820-4530 45150 $ 149 LBRxAG 149 - - - - - - - 149 General supplies 5820-4530 45350 $ 74 LBRxAG 74 - - - - - - - 74 Liability Insurance 5820-4530 46011 $ 3,323 LBRxAG 3,323 - - - - - - - 3,323 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $3,546 $3,546 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,546 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM - Utility Finance $ $104,650 $104,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $104,650 EWRF - GWP ADM - Enviro & Safety
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4540 41100 $ 1,493 G-Plant 1,493 - - - - - - - 1,493 Overtime 5820-4540 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4540 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4540 Various $ 203 G-Plant 203 - - - - - - - 203 PERS Retirement 5820-4540 42700 $ 588 G-Plant 588 - - - - - - - 588 PERS cost sharing 5820-4540 42701 $ (44) G-Plant (44) - - - - - - - (44) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $2,240 $2,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,240 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4540 43110 $ 702 G-Plant 702 - - - - - - - 702 Postage 5820-4540 44450 $ 1 G-Plant 1 - - - - - - - 1
Travel 5820-4540 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Training 5820-4540 44650 $ 62 G-Plant 62 - - - - - - - 62 Regulatory 5820-4540 44760 $ 130 G-Plant 130 - - - - - - - 130 Membership and dues 5820-4540 44800 $ 8 G-Plant 8 - - - - - - - 8 Office supplies 5820-4540 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - General supplies 5820-4540 45350 $ 52 G-Plant 52 - - - - - - - 52 Business meetings 5820-4540 45681 $ 3 G-Plant 3 - - - - - - - 3 Miscellaneous 5820-4540 45682 $ 182 G-Plant 182 - - - - - - - 182 Liability Insurance 5820-4540 46011 $ 80 G-Plant 80 - - - - - - - 80 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $1,220 $1,220 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,220 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM - Enviro & Safety $ $3,460 $3,460 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,460 EWRF - GWP ADM - Util Oper Center & Warehouse
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4550 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4550 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4550 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4550 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS retirement 5820-4550 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4550 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Repairs buildings and grounds 5820-4550 43050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Lease payments 5820-4550 43070 $ - NA - 276 of 895 - - - - - - - - Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Contractual services 5820-4550 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4550 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Laundry and towel service 5820-4550 44600 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4550 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Furniture and equipment 5820-4550 45150 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4550 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Small tools 5820-4550 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4550 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Materials overhead 5820-4550 45620 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4550 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 5820-4550 45682 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 5820-4550 46005 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Liability Insurance 5820-4550 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP ADM - Util Oper Center & Warehouse $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Yard ADM
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4560 41100 $ 13,921 LBRxAG 13,921 - - - - - - - 13,921 Overtime 5820-4560 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4560 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4560 Various $ 5,818 LBRxAG 5,818 - - - - - - - 5,818 PERS retirement 5820-4560 42700 $ 5,482 LBRxAG 5,482 - - - - - - - 5,482 PERS cost sharing 5820-4560 42701 $ (411) LBRxAG (411) - - - - - - - (411) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $24,810 $24,810 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,810 Maintenance & Operation
Furniture and equipment 5820-4560 45150 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4560 45250 $ 1,788 LBRxAG 1,788 - - - - - - - 1,788 General supplies 5820-4560 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Printing and graphics 5820-4560 45450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 5820-4560 45682 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Liability Insurance 5820-4560 46011 $ 745 LBRxAG 745 - - - - - - - 745 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $2,533 $2,533 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,533 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Yard ADM $ $27,344 $27,344 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,344 EWRF - GWP Electric - Engineering
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4600 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4600 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4600 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4600 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS Retirement 5820-4600 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4600 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salary charges in (out) 5820-4600 42799 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4600 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Data communication 5820-4600 44250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4600 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4600 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Training 5820-4600 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Computer software 5820-4600 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Regulatory 5820-4600 44760 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Membership and dues 5820-4600 44800 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Books 5820-4600 45100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Furniture and equipment 5820-4600 45150 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4600 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Small tools 5820-4600 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4600 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4600 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 5820-4600 45682 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 5820-4600 46005 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
ISD service charge 5820-4600 46009 $ - NA - 277 of 895 - - - - - - - - Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Liability Insurance 5820-4600 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Engineering $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - Customer Support
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4610 41100 $ 805,089 C-Services 805,089 - - - - - - - 805,089 Overtime 5820-4610 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4610 Various $ 163,726 C-Services 163,726 - - - - - - - 163,726 PERS retirement 5820-4610 42700 $ 317,446 C-Services 317,446 - - - - - - - 317,446 PERS cost sharing 5820-4610 42701 $ (23,811) C-Services (23,811) - - - - - - - (23,811) Salary charges in (out) 5820-4610 42799 $ (109,368) C-Services (109,368) - - - - - - - (109,368) Salaries & Benefits Total $ $1,153,082 $1,153,082 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,153,082 Maintenance & Operation
Training 5820-4610 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4610 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Liability Insurance 5820-4610 46011 $ 43,113 C-Services 43,113 - - - - - - - 43,113 Maintenance & Operation Total $ $43,113 $43,113 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,113 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Customer Support $ $1,196,195 $1,196,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,196,195 EWRF - GWP Electric - Street Lighting
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4620 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4620 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4620 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS Retirement 5820-4620 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4620 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salary charges in (out) 5820-4620 42799 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Repairs buildings and grounds 5820-4620 43050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Contractual services 5820-4620 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to equipment 5820-4620 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Small tools 5820-4620 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4620 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4620 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Utilities 5820-4620 46005 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Liability Insurance 5820-4620 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Street Lighting $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - Howard Substation
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4630 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4630 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4630 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS Retirement 5820-4630 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4630 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Telephone 5820-4630 44300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4630 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Training 5820-4630 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Furniture and equipment 5820-4630 45150 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Computer hardware 5820-4630 45170 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4630 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - General supplies 5820-4630 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4630 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Utilities 5820-4630 46005 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Liability Insurance 5820-4630 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Howard Substation $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 278 of 895
Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total EWRF - GWP Electric - Meter & Test Shop
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4640 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4640 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4640 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4640 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS Retirement 5820-4640 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4640 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salary charges in (out) 5820-4640 42799 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4640 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to equipment 5820-4640 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to office equipment 5820-4640 44120 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4640 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4640 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Training 5820-4640 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Small tools 5820-4640 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4640 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Liability Insurance 5820-4640 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Meter & Test Shop $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - Station Maintenance
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4650 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4650 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4650 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS Retirement 5820-4650 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4650 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salary charges in (out) 5820-4650 42799 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Repairs buildings and grounds 5820-4650 43050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Contractual services 5820-4650 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to equipment 5820-4650 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4650 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4650 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Laundry and towel service 5820-4650 44600 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4650 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Computer software 5820-4650 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Regulatory 5820-4650 44760 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Books 5820-4650 45100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Office supplies 5820-4650 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Small tools 5820-4650 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4650 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4650 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Liability Insurance 5820-4650 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Station Maintenance $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - OH & UG
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4660 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4660 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4660 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4660 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS retirement 5820-4660 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4660 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salary charges in (out) 5820-4660 42799 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Repairs buildings and grounds 5820-4660 43050 $ - NA - 279 of 895 - - - - - - - - Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Contractual services 5820-4660 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Construction services 5820-4660 43111 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to equipment 5820-4660 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to office equipment 5820-4660 44120 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4660 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4660 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Laundry and towel service 5820-4660 44600 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4660 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Regulatory 5820-4660 44760 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Membership and dues 5820-4660 44800 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Books 5820-4660 45100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Furniture and equipment 5820-4660 45150 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4660 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Small tools 5820-4660 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4660 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Printing and graphics 5820-4660 45450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4660 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 5820-4660 45682 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
ISD service charge 5820-4660 46009 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Liability Insurance 5820-4660 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - OH & UG $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - Substructure
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4670 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4670 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4670 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS retirement 5820-4670 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4670 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salary charges in (out) 5820-4670 42799 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4670 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Construction services 5820-4670 43111 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to equipment 5820-4670 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4670 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Small tools 5820-4670 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4670 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Liability Insurance 5820-4670 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Substructure $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - Power Management
Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4680 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4680 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4680 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4680 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS retirement 5820-4680 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4680 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Contractual services 5820-4680 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4680 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4680 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Training 5820-4680 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Computer software 5820-4680 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Regulatory 5820-4680 44760 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
RAC variance 5820-4680 44761 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Membership and dues 5820-4680 44800 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Periodicals and newspapers 5820-4680 45050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Office supplies 5820-4680 45250 $ - NA - 280 of 895 - - - - - - - - Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Furniture and equipment 5820-4680 45150 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Fuel natural gas 5820-4680 45502 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Carbon allowances 5820-4680 45506 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Renewable energy credits 5820-4680 45507 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - ECAC variance 5820-4680 45509 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Purchased power 5820-4680 45510 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Hedging costs 5820-4680 45511 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Business meetings 5820-4680 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 5820-4680 45682 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Gas depletion 5820-4680 46001 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 5820-4680 46005 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4680 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Liability Insurance 5820-4680 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Power Management $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EWRF - GWP Electric - Power Plant (Grayson, Wartsila ICE, Tesla Battery) Salaries & Benefits
Salaries 5820-4690 41100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Overtime 5820-4690 41200 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Hourly wages 5820-4690 41300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Benefits 5820-4690 Various $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
PERS retirement 5820-4690 42700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - PERS cost sharing 5820-4690 42701 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Salaries & Benefits Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance & Operation
Repairs buildings and grounds 5820-4690 43050 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Lease payments 5820-4690 43070 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Contractual services 5820-4690 43110 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Repairs to equipment 5820-4690 44100 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Postage 5820-4690 44450 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Travel 5820-4690 44550 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Laundry and towel service 5820-4690 44600 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Training 5820-4690 44650 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Computer software 5820-4690 44700 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Regulatory 5820-4690 44760 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Office supplies 5820-4690 45250 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Small tools 5820-4690 45300 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
General supplies 5820-4690 45350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Business meetings 5820-4690 45681 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 5820-4690 45682 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Utilities 5820-4690 46005 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Liability Insurance 5820-4690 46011 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Maintenance & Operation Total $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EWRF - GWP Electric - Power Plant $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE EXPENSE $ $20,957,035 $20,957,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,957,035 Fuel, Purchased Power, Wheeling $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total O&M less Fuel, PP, Wheeling $ $20,957,035 $20,957,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,957,035 Transfers to the General Fund
TOTAL Transfers to the General Fund $ $1,439,911 RRxTransfer $1,439,911 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,439,911 Capital Paid from Cash / Earnings
Capital from Cash $ 157 Cash CIP 157 - - - - - - - 157
Total Capital from Cash $ $157 $157 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $157 Debt Service
Existing Debt Service
2013 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
2013 Refunding $ 7,284 N-Plant 7,284 281 of 895 - - - - - - - 7,284 Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total 2016 Refunding $ 8,638 N-Plant 8,638 - - - - - - - 8,638 Total Existing Debt Service $ $15,922 $15,922 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,922 Proposed Debt Service
Grayson Grayson $166 mil debt in 2024, 2025 & 2026 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Total New Debt Service $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL Debt Service $ $15,922 $15,922 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,922 Miscellaneous Expenses (Revenues)
Open $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Interest Income $ (230,906) RRxFPPW (230,906) - - - - - - - (230,906) Sale of Property $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Capital Contributions $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Miscellaneous Revenues $ (2,178,217) RRxFPPW (2,178,217) - - - - - - - (2,178,217) Sales to Other utilities $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL Miscellaneous Expenses (Revenues) $ ($2,409,123) ($2,409,123) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($2,409,123) Contribution to Reserves
Change in Reserves $ 374,501 RR 374,501 - - - - - - - 374,501 Change in Reserves $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL Change in Reserves $ $374,501 $374,501 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $374,501 Revenue Requirement Summary
O&M $ 20,957,035 20,957,035 - - - - - - - 20,957,035
Capital from Cash $ 157 157 - - - - - - - 157
Debt Service $ 15,922 15,922 - - - - - - - 15,922
Transfers to the General Fund $ 1,439,911 1,439,911 - - - - - - - 1,439,911 Miscellaneous Expenses (Revenues) $ (2,409,123) (2,409,123) - - - - - - - (2,409,123) Contribution to Reserves $ 374,501 374,501 - - - - - - - 374,501 Total Revenue Requirement $ $20,378,404 $20,378,404 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,378,404 -
Total Revenues under Current Rates $
Over (Under) Collection Percentage %
Plant in Service
Gross Plant in Service (Does not include SCPPA Natural Gas Reserve Pinedale Project) Production
Steam Production
Land & Land Rights 310 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 311 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Boiler Plant Equipment 312 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Turbogenerator Units 314 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Engines for Biogas at Scholl Canyon Biogas at Scholl Canyon $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Engines Unit 10-13 at Grayson $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Accessory Electric Equip. 315 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Misc. Power Plant Equip. 316 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total steam production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Combustion turbine & other production
Structures and Improvements 341 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Fuel Holder, Producer & Acc 342 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Prime Movers 343 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Generators 344 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Accessory Plant Equipment 345 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Misc. Power Plant Equipment 346 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Total combustion turbine & other production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Transmission
Tesla Battery Storage $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Land and Land Rights 350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Energy Storage 351 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 352 $ - NA - 282 of 895 - - - - - - - - Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Station Equipment 353 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Towers and Fixtures 354 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
O.H. Conductors & Devices 356 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conduit 357 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conductors 358 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total transmission $ - - - - - - - - - -
Distribution $
Land and Land Rights 360 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 361 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Station Equipment 362 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Poles, Towers & Fixtures 364 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
O.H. Conductors & Devices 365 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conduits 366 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
U.G. Conductors & Devices 367 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Line Transformers 368 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Services 369 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Meters 370 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Street Lights 373 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total distribution $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal before general $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 General
Land and Land Rights 389 $ 212,739 LBR 212,739 - - - - - - - 212,739 Structures and Improvements 390 $ 3,855,206 LBR 3,855,206 - - - - - - - 3,855,206 Office Furniture & Equip. 391 $ 39,379 LBR 39,379 - - - - - - - 39,379 Transportation Equipment 392 $ 1,395,960 LBR 1,395,960 - - - - - - - 1,395,960 Tools, Shop & Garage Equip. 394 $ 100,601 LBR 100,601 - - - - - - - 100,601 Laboratory Equipment 395 $ 2,151 G-Plant 2,151 - - - - - - - 2,151 Power Operated Equipment 396 $ 106 G-Plant 106 - - - - - - - 106 Communication Equipment 397 $ 7,227 G-Plant 7,227 - - - - - - - 7,227 Misc. Equipment 398 $ 49,550 G-Plant 49,550 - - - - - - - 49,550 Other Tangible 399 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total general $ $5,662,918 $5,662,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,662,918 Total gross plant in service $ $5,662,918 $5,662,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,662,918 -
Accumulated Depreciation
Production
Steam Production
Land & Land Rights 310 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 311 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Boiler Plant Equipment 312 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Turbogenerator Units 314 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Engines for Biogas at Scholl Canyon 0 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Engines Unit 10-13 at Grayson 0 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Accessory Electric Equip. 315 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Misc. Power Plant Equip. 316 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total steam production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Combustion turbine & other production
Structures and Improvements 341 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Fuel Holder, Producer & Acc 342 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Prime Movers 343 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Generators 344 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Accessory Plant Equipment 345 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Misc. Power Plant Equipment 346 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Total combustion turbine & other production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Transmission 283 of 895
Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Tesla Battery Storage 0 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Land and Land Rights 350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Energy Storage 351 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 352 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Station Equipment 353 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Towers and Fixtures 354 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
O.H. Conductors & Devices 356 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conduit 357 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conductors 358 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total transmission $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Distribution
Land and Land Rights 360 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 361 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Station Equipment 362 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Poles, Towers & Fixtures 364 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
O.H. Conductors & Devices 365 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conduits 366 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
U.G. Conductors & Devices 367 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Line Transformers 368 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Services 369 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Meters 370 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Street Lights 373 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total distribution $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal before general $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 General
Land and Land Rights 389 $ - LBR - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 390 $ 3,316,233 LBR 3,316,233 - - - - - - - 3,316,233 Office Furniture & Equip. 391 $ 39,379 LBR 39,379 - - - - - - - 39,379 Transportation Equipment 392 $ 1,079,919 LBR 1,079,919 - - - - - - - 1,079,919 Tools, Shop & Garage Equip. 394 $ 92,167 LBR 92,167 - - - - - - - 92,167 Laboratory Equipment 395 $ 2,151 G-Plant 2,151 - - - - - - - 2,151 Power Operated Equipment 396 $ 26 G-Plant 26 - - - - - - - 26 Communication Equipment 397 $ 2,487 G-Plant 2,487 - - - - - - - 2,487 Misc. Equipment 398 $ 46,452 G-Plant 46,452 - - - - - - - 46,452 Other Tangible 399 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total general $ $4,578,812 $4,578,812 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,578,812 Total accumulated depreciation $ $4,578,812 $4,578,812 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,578,812 -
Net Plant in Service
Production
Steam Production
Land & Land Rights 310 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 311 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Boiler Plant Equipment 312 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Turbogenerator Units 314 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Engines for Biogas at Scholl Canyon 0 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Engines Unit 10-13 at Grayson 0 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Accessory Electric Equip. 315 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Misc. Power Plant Equip. 316 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total steam production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Combustion turbine & other production
Structures and Improvements 341 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Fuel Holder, Producer & Acc 342 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Prime Movers 343 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Generators 344 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Accessory Plant Equipment 345 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Misc. Power Plant Equipment 346 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Total combustion turbine & other production $ $0 $0 284 of 895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total Total production $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Transmission
Tesla Battery Storage 0 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Land and Land Rights 350 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Energy Storage 351 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 352 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Station Equipment 353 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Towers and Fixtures 354 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
O.H. Conductors & Devices 356 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conduit 357 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conductors 358 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total transmission $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Distribution
Land and Land Rights 360 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Structures and Improvements 361 $ - NA - - - - - - - - - Station Equipment 362 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Poles, Towers & Fixtures 364 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
O.H. Conductors & Devices 365 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Underground Conduits 366 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
U.G. Conductors & Devices 367 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Line Transformers 368 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Services 369 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Meters 370 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Street Lights 373 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total distribution $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal before general $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 General
Land and Land Rights 389 $ 212,739 LBR 212,739 - - - - - - - 212,739 Structures and Improvements 390 $ 538,973 LBR 538,973 - - - - - - - 538,973 Office Furniture & Equip. 391 $ - LBR - - - - - - - - - Transportation Equipment 392 $ 316,041 LBR 316,041 - - - - - - - 316,041 Tools, Shop & Garage Equip. 394 $ 8,434 LBR 8,434 - - - - - - - 8,434 Laboratory Equipment 395 $ - G-Plant - - - - - - - - -
Power Operated Equipment 396 $ 80 G-Plant 80 - - - - - - - 80 Communication Equipment 397 $ 4,741 G-Plant 4,741 - - - - - - - 4,741 Misc. Equipment 398 $ 3,098 G-Plant 3,098 - - - - - - - 3,098 Other Tangible 399 $ - NA - - - - - - - - -
Total general $ $1,084,106 $1,084,106 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,084,106 Total net plant in service $ $1,084,106 $1,084,106 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,084,106 -
Allocation factors
C-Services C-Services 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
1 - - - - - - - 1
C-Accounting C-Accounting 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% - 1 - - - - - - 1
Other Other 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
- - 1 - - - - - 1
Other Other 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
- - - 1 - - - - 1
Other Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
- - - - 1 - - - 1
Other Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
- - - - - 1 - - 1
Other Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
- - - - - - 1 - 1
Other Other 0% 285 of 895 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Appendix A
Customer Classification
Test Year
Description Fund-Dept Account Units 2024-2028 Allocator C-Services C-Accounting Other Other Other Other Other Other Total - - - - - - - 1 1
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
RevReq RR 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
20,378,404 - - - - - - - 20,378,404
Revenue Requirement less Fuel/PP/Wheeling RRxFPPW 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 20,378,404 - - - - - - - 20,378,404
Gross Plant G-Plant 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5,662,918 - - - - - - - 5,662,918
Net Plant N-Plant 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
1,084,106 - - - - - - - 1,084,106
Labor LBR 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
7,329,663 - - - - - - - 7,329,663
Labor x/ A&G LBRxAG 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
7,073,470 - - - - - - - 7,073,470
Gross General G-Gen 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5,662,918 - - - - - - - 5,662,918
Open Cash CIP 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
2,979 - 2,979
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Rev Req without Transfers RRxTransfer 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 18,938,493 - - - - - - - 18,938,493
Not Applicable NA 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
286 of 895
Appendix A
Allocated Cost of Service
Test Year Residential Sml. Business Med. Business Lg. Business Street Lights Description Units 2024-2028 Allocator L-1 L-2 LD-2 PC-1 SL1, SL2, SL3 Total Allocation
Power Supply
Demand
GWP Demand Baseload $ 61,453,179 12CP 26,851,565 5,961,442 13,157,306 15,355,698 127,168 61,453,179 GWP Demand Peaking $ 49,566,750 4CP 24,443,231 4,571,287 9,733,728 10,763,878 54,626 49,566,750 Market Demand $ 3,611,436 12CP 1,577,993 350,338 773,219 902,413 7,473 3,611,436 Energy
Variable $ 121,315,341 NEFL 47,578,496 11,048,979 27,361,393 34,624,463 702,011 121,315,341 Total Power Supply $ 235,946,706 100,451,286 21,932,046 51,025,645 61,646,452 891,278 235,946,706 -
Transmission
Demand
Demand $ 7,122,397 4CP 3,512,322 656,862 1,398,669 1,546,694 7,849 7,122,397 Total Transmission $ 7,122,397 3,512,322 656,862 1,398,669 1,546,694 7,849 7,122,397 -
Distribution
Demand
Demand Substation $ 13,249,118 4 NCP 7,386,498 1,043,739 2,252,708 2,518,465 47,708 13,249,118 Demand Primary Lines $ 7,569,897 4 NCP 4,220,283 596,341 1,287,087 1,438,927 27,258 7,569,897 Demand Secondary Lines $ 16,798,985 4 NCP 9,365,579 1,323,391 2,856,281 3,193,243 60,491 16,798,985 Demand Transformers $ 335,781 4 NCP 187,201 26,452 57,092 63,827 1,209 335,781 Customer
Customer Transformers $ 24,672 C-Xformer 20,707 2,660 455 49 801 24,672 Customer Services $ 173,438 No. Cust 150,444 19,329 3,305 358 1 173,438 Customer Meters $ 4,517,959 No. Meter 3,918,977 503,518 86,091 9,335 39 4,517,959 Other
Customer Streetlights $ 685,614 St. Light - - - - 685,614 685,614 Total Distribution $ 43,355,464 25,249,688 3,515,431 6,543,019 7,224,205 823,121 43,355,464 -
Customer
Customer
C-Services $ 20,378,404 C-Service 14,869,141 3,820,831 979,925 708,361 147 20,378,404 C-Accounting $ - C-Accounting - - - - - -
Total Customer $ 20,378,404 - 14,869,141 3,820,831 979,925 708,361 147 20,378,404 -
Total Revenue Requirement $ 306,802,972 - 144,082,437 29,925,170 59,947,259 71,125,712 1,722,395 306,802,972 -
Analysis
Revenues under current rates
Base Rate $ 230,130,506 100,811,925 20,845,918 50,107,775 55,458,888 2,906,000 230,130,506 ECA $ - - - - - -
RAC $ - - - - - -
RDC $ - - - - - -
Total Bill Revenues $ 230,130,506 100,811,925 20,845,918 50,107,775 55,458,888 2,906,000 230,130,506 -
Total Rate Revenue VS Revenue Requirement
Total Bill - Over / (Under) Recovery $ (76,672,465) (43,270,512) (9,079,251) (9,839,484) (15,666,824) 1,183,605 (76,672,465) Total Bill - Rate Increase (Decrease) needed 33.3% 42.9% 43.6% 19.6% 28.2% -40.7% 33.3% Base Rate Revenues VS Revenue Requirement
Base Rate - Revenue Requirement $ 306,802,972 144,082,437 29,925,170 59,947,259 71,125,712 1,722,395 306,802,972 Base Rate - Current Revenues $ 230,130,506 100,811,925 20,845,918 50,107,775 55,458,888 2,906,000 230,130,506 Total Over / (Under) Recovery $ (76,672,465) (43,270,512) (9,079,251) (9,839,484) (15,666,824) 1,183,605 (76,672,465) Base Rate Increase (Decrease) needed 33.3% 42.9% 43.6% 19.6% 28.2% -40.7% 33.3% Unit Cost Analysis
Power Supply 287 of 895
Appendix A
Demand
GWP Demand Baseload $ 26.36 12CP 26.36 26.36 26.36 26.36 26.36 26.36 GWP Demand Peaking $ 45.30 4CP 45.30 45.30 45.30 45.30 45.30 45.30 Market Demand $ 1.55 12CP 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 Energy $ -
Variable $ 0.1167 NEFL 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 Total Power Supply $ 73.33 - 73.33 73.33 73.33 73.33 73.33 73.33 Transmission
Demand
Demand $ 7 4CP 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51
Total Transmission $
Distribution
Demand
Demand Substation $ 10.04 4 NCP 10.04 10.04 10.04 10.04 10.04 10.04 Demand Primary Lines $ 5.74 4 NCP 5.74 5.74 5.74 5.74 5.74 5.74 Demand Secondary Lines $ 12.73 4 NCP 12.73 12.73 12.73 12.73 12.73 12.73 Demand Transformers $ 0.25 4 NCP 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Customer $ -
Customer Transformers $ 0.26 C-Xformer 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Customer Services $ 1.92 No. Cust 1.92 1.92 1.92 1.92 1.92 1.92 Customer Meters $ 49.92 No. Meter 49.92 49.92 49.92 49.92 49.92 49.92 Other $ -
Customer Streetlights $ 56.46 St. Light - - - - 56.46 56.46 Total Distribution $ 137.32 80.86 80.86 80.86 80.86 137.32 137.32 Customer
Customer
C-Services $ 189.40 C-Service 189.40 189.40 189.40 189.40 189.40 189.40 C-Accounting $ - C-Accounting - - - - - -
Other $ - NA - - - - - -
Total Customer $ 189 189 189 189 189 189 189
Energy rate without Demand 0.2925 0.3377 0.2938 0.2680 0.2529 0.1866 0.2925 Test Year COSA $/kWh sales $ 0.3134 $ 0.3766 $ 0.3368 $ 0.2725 $ 0.2555 $ 0.1866 $ 0.3134 Test Year Current Revenues $/kWh sales (incl. current pass throughs) 33.3% $ 0.2350 $ 0.2635 $ 0.2346 $ 0.2277 $ 0.1992 $ 0.3149 $ 0.2350 kWh per Month 406 734 10,631 124,074 991,510 902
Revenue Requirement Classified
Demand $ 159,707,543 77,544,673 14,529,852 31,516,090 35,783,146 333,782 159,707,543 Energy $ 121,315,341 47,578,496 11,048,979 27,361,393 34,624,463 702,011 121,315,341 Customer $ 25,094,473 18,959,268 4,346,338 1,069,775 718,104 988 25,094,473 Other $ 685,614 - - - - 685,614 685,614
$ 306,802,972 144,082,437 29,925,170 59,947,259 71,125,712 1,722,395 306,802,972 $ - - - - - - -
Revenue Requirement Classified Unit Cost
Demand-4CP $ 145.96 $ 143.71 $ 143.99 $ 146.67 $ 150.59 $ 276.80 $ 145.96 Demand-SMD $ 33.15 $ 25.82 $ 33.87 $ 45.43 $ 52.71 $ 24.58 $ 33.15 Energy-NEFL $ 0.1167 $ 0.1167 $ 0.1167 $ 0.1167 $ 0.1167 $ 0.1167 $ 0.1167 Energy-Sales $ 0.1239 $ 0.1244 $ 0.1244 $ 0.1244 $ 0.1244 $ 0.0761 $ 0.1239 Customer-No Cust./light $ 277.27 $ 241.50 $ 430.90 $ 620.30 $ 3,840.13 $ 0.08 $ 277.27 Customer-No Cust./month $ 23.11 $ 20.13 $ 35.91 $ 51.69 $ 320.01 $ 0.01 $ 23.11 Class Characteristics
kWh/customer or light/month 902 406 734 10,631 124,074 63 902 Load Factor 28% 17% 28% 43% 56% 93% 28%
Avg kW/Customer or light 4 3.2 3.5 33.5 302.6 0.1 4.4
Percent of Total Energy 100% 39% 9% 22% 28% 1% 100%
Percent of Total SMD 100% 62% 9% 14% 14% 0% 100%
Percent of Total Customers 100% 87% 11% 2% 0% 0% 100%
Percent of Energy Costs 100% 39% 9% 23% 29% 1% 100%
Percent of Demand Costs 100% 49% 288 of 895 9% 20% 22% 0% 100% Appendix A
Percent of Customer Costs 100% 76% 17% 4% 3% 0% 100%
No. Customers or Lights 78,506 10,087 1,725 187 12,144 90,505 Allocation factors
Net Energy For Load NEFL 39% 9% 23% 29% 1% 100%
407,751,486 94,690,628 234,489,308 296,734,393 6,016,289 1,039,682,104 Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Energy at Meter - Sales Sales 39% 9% 22% 28% 1% 100%
382,588,066 88,847,019 220,018,354 278,422,130 9,229,305 979,104,873 12 Coincident Peak 12CP 44% 10% 21% 25% 0% 100%
1,018,483 226,118 499,058 582,443 4,823 2,330,926
4 Coincident Peak 4CP 49% 9% 20% 22% 0% 100%
539,587 100,912 214,873 237,614 1,206 1,094,191
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
12 Non Coincident Peak 12 NCP 51% 8% 19% 22% 0% 100%
1,445,142 235,950 535,439 628,650 14,253 2,859,434
4 Non Coincident Peak 4 NCP 56% 8% 17% 19% 0% 100%
735,603 103,943 224,342 250,808 4,751 1,319,447
Open Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Sum of Maximum Demands Sum Max Dem 62% 9% 14% 14% 0% 100% 3,003,141 428,983 693,799 678,930 13,577 4,818,431
Number of Customers No. Cust 87% 11% 2% 0% 0% 100%
78,506 10,087 1,725 187 1 90,505
Number of Meters No. Meter 87% 11% 2% 0% 0% 100%
78,506 10,087 1,725 187 1 90,505
Street Lights St. Light 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
- - - - 12,144 12,144
Number of Service Connections C-Connections 87% 11% 2% 0% 0% 100% 78,506 10,087 1,725 187 0 90,504
Number of Customers for Transformers C-Xformer 84% 11% 2% 0% 3% 100% 78,506 10,087 1,725 187 3,036 93,540
Customer Accounting C-Accounting 83% 11% 2% 4% 0% 100%
78,506 10,087 1,725 3,740 1 94,058
Customer Service C-Service 73% 19% 5% 3% 0% 100%
78,506 20,173 5,174 3,740 1 107,594
Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Open 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
Not Applicable NA 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
-
289 of 895
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 450, Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Phone: (720) 633-9514
Email: [email protected]
www.newgenstrategies.net
290 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $0.64 $0.70 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75
Energy kWh
High Season - First 10 kWh/day $0.1661 $0.2481 $0.2863 $0.3335 $0.3335 $0.3335 High Season - Next 10 kWh/day $0.2059 $0.3075 $0.3549 $0.4134 $0.4134 $0.4134 High Season - Remaining kWh $0.2459 $0.3673 $0.4238 $0.4937 $0.4937 $0.4937 Low Season - First 10 kWh/day $0.1393 $0.2081 $0.2401 $0.2797 $0.2797 $0.2797 Low Season - Next 10 kWh/day $0.1725 $0.2577 $0.2973 $0.3464 $0.3464 $0.3464 Low Season - Remaining kWh $0.2128 $0.3179 $0.3668 $0.4273 $0.4273 $0.4273 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Residential Solar (L-1-D).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $0.82 $0.70 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75
Energy kWh
High Season - Base $0.1227 $0.1870 $0.2141 $0.2456 $0.2456 $0.2456 High Season - Peak $0.3681 $0.5610 $0.6423 $0.7368 $0.7368 $0.7368 Low Season - Base $0.1023 $0.1559 $0.1785 $0.2048 $0.2048 $0.2048 Low Season - Peak $0.3068 $0.4676 $0.5353 $0.6141 $0.6141 $0.6141 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Residential Solar TOU (L-1-E).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Residential Service L-1-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Residential Service L-1-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
EXHIBIT 2
291 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $0.62 $0.80 $1.00 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25
Energy kWh
High Season $0.1841 $0.2674 $0.2993 $0.3312 $0.3312 $0.3312 Low Season $0.1595 $0.2317 $0.2593 $0.2869 $0.2869 $0.2869 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Small Business Solar (L-2-C).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.33 $0.80 $1.00 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25
Energy kWh
High Season – Base $0.1040 $0.1681 $0.1899 $0.2126 $0.2126 $0.2126 High Season – Peak $0.3119 $0.5041 $0.5695 $0.6376 $0.6376 $0.6376 Low Season – Base $0.0800 $0.1293 $0.1461 $0.1635 $0.1635 $0.1635 Low Season – Peak $0.2399 $0.3878 $0.4380 $0.4904 $0.4904 $0.4904 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Small Business Solar TOU (L-2-D).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Small Business L-2-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Small Business L-2-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
292 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.00 $1.25 $1.50 $1.70 $1.70 $1.70
Energy kWh
High Season $0.0847 $0.1441 $0.1583 $0.1707 $0.1707 $0.1707 Low Season $0.0810 $0.1378 $0.1514 $0.1632 $0.1632 $0.1632 Demand kW
High Season $0.99 $1.04 $1.08 $1.15 $1.15 $1.15
Low Season $0.69 $0.72 $0.75 $0.80 $0.80 $0.80
ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Medium Business Solar (LD-2-C).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.11 $1.25 $1.50 $1.70 $1.70 $1.70
Energy kWh
High Season – Base $0.0823 $0.1268 $0.1374 $0.1479 $0.1479 $0.1479 High Season – Peak $0.2423 $0.3733 $0.4045 $0.4354 $0.4354 $0.4354 Low Season – Base $0.0823 $0.1268 $0.1374 $0.1479 $0.1479 $0.1479 Low Season – Peak $0.1455 $0.2242 $0.2429 $0.2615 $0.2615 $0.2615 Demand kW
High Season $0.58 $0.61 $0.63 $0.67 $0.67 $0.67
Low Season $0.48 $0.50 $0.52 $0.55 $0.55 $0.55
ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Medium Business Solar TOU (LD-2-D).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Medium Business LD-2-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Medium Business LD-2-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
293 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $5.82 $7.00 $9.00 $10.50 $10.50 $10.50 Energy kWh
High Season $0.0695 $0.1345 $0.1513 $0.1698 $0.1698 $0.1698 Low Season $0.0628 $0.1215 $0.1367 $0.1534 $0.1534 $0.1534 Demand kW
High Season $1.19 $1.25 $1.32 $1.40 $1.40 $1.40
Low Season $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06
Reactive Power kVAR $0.004 $0.006 $0.008 $0.010 $0.010 $0.010 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Large Business Solar (PC-1-C).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $5.82 $7.00 $9.00 $10.50 $10.50 $10.50 Energy kWh
High Season - Base $0.0714 $0.1194 $0.1322 $0.1463 $0.1463 $0.1463 High Season – Peak $0.2008 $0.3358 $0.3718 $0.4114 $0.4114 $0.4114 Low Season - Base $0.0714 $0.1194 $0.1322 $0.1463 $0.1463 $0.1463 Low Season – Peak $0.1163 $0.1945 $0.2153 $0.2383 $0.2383 $0.2383 Demand kW
High Season $0.82 $0.86 $0.91 $0.96 $0.96 $0.96
Low Season $0.58 $0.61 $0.64 $0.68 $0.68 $0.68
Reactive Power kVAR $0.004 $0.006 $0.008 $0.010 $0.010 $0.010 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates apply to the Large Business Solar TOU (PC-1-D) High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Large Business PC-1-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Large Business PC-1-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
294 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $0.64 $0.67 $0.70 $0.73 $0.75 $0.75
Energy kWh
High Season - First 10 kWh/day $0.1661 $0.2462 $0.2758 $0.3090 $0.3467 $0.3467 High Season - Next 10 kWh/day $0.2059 $0.3052 $0.3419 $0.3830 $0.4298 $0.4298 High Season - Remaining kWh $0.2459 $0.3645 $0.4083 $0.4575 $0.5133 $0.5133 Low Season - First 10 kWh/day $0.1393 $0.2065 $0.2313 $0.2591 $0.2908 $0.2908 Low Season - Next 10 kWh/day $0.1725 $0.2557 $0.2864 $0.3209 $0.3601 $0.3601 Low Season - Remaining kWh $0.2128 $0.3154 $0.3533 $0.3959 $0.4442 $0.4442 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Residential Solar (L-1-D).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $0.82 $0.67 $0.70 $0.73 $0.75 $0.75
Energy kWh
High Season - Base $0.1227 $0.1849 $0.2056 $0.2287 $0.2545 $0.2545 High Season - Peak $0.3681 $0.5547 $0.6168 $0.6861 $0.7635 $0.7635 Low Season - Base $0.1023 $0.1542 $0.1714 $0.1907 $0.2122 $0.2122 Low Season - Peak $0.3068 $0.4623 $0.5141 $0.5718 $0.6364 $0.6364 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Residential Solar TOU (L-1-E).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Residential Service L-1-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Residential Service L-1-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
295 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $0.62 $0.78 $0.94 $1.10 $1.25 $1.25
Energy kWh
High Season $0.1841 $0.2648 $0.2879 $0.3142 $0.3445 $0.3445 Low Season $0.1595 $0.2294 $0.2494 $0.2722 $0.2985 $0.2985 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Small Business Solar (L-2-C).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.33 $0.78 $0.94 $1.10 $1.25 $1.25
Energy kWh
High Season – Base $0.1040 $0.1663 $0.1824 $0.2003 $0.2204 $0.2204 High Season – Peak $0.3119 $0.4987 $0.5470 $0.6007 $0.6610 $0.6610 Low Season – Base $0.0800 $0.1279 $0.1403 $0.1541 $0.1695 $0.1695 Low Season – Peak $0.2399 $0.3836 $0.4207 $0.4620 $0.5084 $0.5084 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Small Business Solar TOU (L-2-D).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Small Business L-2-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Small Business L-2-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
296 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.00 $1.18 $1.36 $1.54 $1.70 $1.70
Energy kWh
High Season $0.0847 $0.1431 $0.1546 $0.1677 $0.1839 $0.1839 Low Season $0.0810 $0.1368 $0.1478 $0.1604 $0.1759 $0.1759 Demand kW/Day
High Season $0.99 $1.03 $1.07 $1.11 $1.15 $1.15
Low Season $0.69 $0.72 $0.75 $0.77 $0.77 $0.77
ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Medium Business Solar (LD-2-C).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.00 $1.18 $1.36 $1.54 $1.70 $1.70
Reservation Charge kW/day $0.54 $0.54 $0.54 $0.54 $0.54 $0.54 Supplemental Service Charge
Energy High Season kWh $0.0847 $0.1431 $0.1546 $0.1677 $0.1839 $0.1839 Energy Low Season kWh $0.0810 $0.1368 $0.1478 $0.1604 $0.1759 $0.1759 Demand High Season kW/day $0.99 $1.03 $1.07 $1.11 $1.15 $1.15 Demand Low Season kW/day $0.69 $0.72 $0.75 $0.77 $0.77 $0.77 Backup Service Charge
Energy Charge kWh See LD-2-A See LD-2-A See LD-2-A See LD-2-A See LD-2-A See LD-2-A Demand High Season kW/day $0.45 $0.49 $0.53 $0.57 $0.61 $0.61 Demand Low Season kW/day $0.15 $0.18 $0.21 $0.23 $0.23 $0.23 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $1.11 $1.18 $1.36 $1.54 $1.70 $1.70
Energy kWh
High Season – Base $0.0823 $0.1260 $0.1347 $0.1440 $0.1544 $0.1544 High Season – Peak $0.2423 $0.3710 $0.3966 $0.4240 $0.4546 $0.4546 Low Season – Base $0.0823 $0.1260 $0.1347 $0.1440 $0.1544 $0.1544 Low Season – Peak $0.1455 $0.2228 $0.2381 $0.2546 $0.2730 $0.2730 Demand kW/day
High Season $0.58 $0.60 $0.63 $0.65 $0.67 $0.67
Low Season $0.48 $0.50 $0.52 $0.54 $0.55 $0.55
ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Medium Business Solar TOU (LD-2-D).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Note: Reservation Charge is a monthly charge applied to the contracted amount of standby capacity, typically aligned with generation capacity (kW) of the customer-owned generation resource.
- Supplemental Service Charge is only applicable to the portion of power and energy required by and delivered to the customer in excess of the customer self-generation. This charge aligns with the standard LD-1-A charges. - Backup Service Charge is applicable during an unscheduled outage of the customer-owned generation resource and applied to the demand and energy consumption typically served by the customer-owned generation.
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Standby Service Rider: Medium Business Dispatchable
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Medium Business LD-2-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Medium Business LD-2-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
297 of 895
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $5.82 $6.99 $8.16 $9.33 $10.50 $10.50 Energy kWh
High Season $0.0695 $0.1337 $0.1480 $0.1641 $0.1805 $0.1805 Low Season $0.0628 $0.1208 $0.1337 $0.1483 $0.1631 $0.1631 Demand kW/day
High Season $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 $1.34 $1.40 $1.40
Low Season $0.90 $0.94 $0.98 $1.01 $1.06 $1.06
Reactive Power kVAR/Day $0.004 $0.006 $0.008 $0.010 $0.010 $0.010 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates also apply to Large Business Solar (PC-1-C).
High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $5.82 $6.99 $8.16 $9.33 $10.50 $10.50 Reservation Charge kW/day $0.64 $0.64 $0.64 $0.64 $0.64 $0.64 Supplemental Service Charge
Energy High Season kWh $0.0695 $0.1337 $0.1480 $0.1641 $0.1805 $0.1805 Energy Low Season kWh $0.0628 $0.1208 $0.1337 $0.1483 $0.1631 $0.1631 Demand High Season kW/day $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 $1.34 $1.40 $1.40 Demand Low Season kW/day $0.90 $0.94 $0.98 $1.01 $1.06 $1.06 Reactive Power Charge kVAR/Day $0.004 $0.006 $0.008 $0.010 $0.010 $0.010 Backup Service Charge
Energy Charge kWh See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A Demand High Season kW/day $0.55 $0.60 $0.65 $0.70 $0.76 $0.76 Demand Low Season kW/day $0.26 $0.30 $0.34 $0.37 $0.42 $0.42 Reactive Power Charge kVAR/Day See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A See PC-1-A ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Dec 1, 2023 Jul 1, 2024 Jul 1, 2025 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Customer Meter/Day $5.82 $6.99 $8.16 $9.33 $10.50 $10.50 Energy kWh
High Season - Base $0.0714 $0.1188 $0.1291 $0.1407 $0.1530 $0.1530 High Season – Peak $0.2008 $0.3341 $0.3631 $0.3957 $0.4303 $0.4303 Low Season - Base $0.0714 $0.1188 $0.1291 $0.1407 $0.1530 $0.1530 Low Season – Peak $0.1163 $0.1935 $0.2103 $0.2292 $0.2492 $0.2492 Demand kW/day
High Season $0.82 $0.85 $0.89 $0.92 $0.96 $0.96
Low Season $0.58 $0.60 $0.63 $0.65 $0.68 $0.68
Reactive Power kVAR/Day $0.004 $0.006 $0.008 $0.010 $0.010 $0.010 ECAC kWh $0.0001 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RAC kWh $0.0250 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 RDC kWh $0.0159 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 Note: These rates apply to the Large Business Solar TOU (PC-1-D) High Season are months July, August, September, October Low Season are months November through June
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Large Business PC-1-B
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Standby Service Rider: Large Business Dispatchable
Current and Proposed Electric Rates:
Large Business PC-1-A
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
- Supplemental Service Charge is only applicable to the portion of power and energy required by and delivered to the customer in excess of the customer self-generation. This charge aligns with the standard LD-1-A charges. - Backup Service Charge is applicable during an unscheduled outage of the customer-owned generation resource and applied to the demand and energy consumption typically served by the customer-owned generation.
Item Unit Current Rate
Proposed Rates
Note: Reservation Charge is a monthly charge applied to the contracted amount of standby capacity, typically aligned with generation capacity (kW) of the customer-owned generation resource.
298 of 895
8d
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Grayson Repowering Project – Demolition and Site Improvement Contract Contingency Amount Amendment; Balance of Site Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) Contract Award, Professional Services Agreement Amendment; and Wartsila North America, Inc. Engineering and Procurement Contract Award
1. Motion authorizing an increase to the contingency amount by $10,000,000 to a new contingency amount of $15,443,747 to the existing Contract No. 8002075 with Silverado Contractors, Inc. (Silverado) for the Grayson Repowering Project.
2. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to the existing PSA, Contract No. 8002155, with ARB, Inc. (ARB), increasing the not to exceed amount by $330,000 to a new not to exceed amount of $630,000 and to add the following to the scope of work: 1) develop an indicative construction cost for the Wartsila Power Island, and 2) perform the necessary engineering to support and prepare procurement documents for long lead electrical equipment, and 3) then obtain formal quotations.
3. Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an EPC contract with ARB, in the not to exceed amount of $362,700,000 plus a 10% contingency of $36,270,000 to 1) serve as the EPC for the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Power Island, 2) serve as the EPC for the BOS work, 3) integration of the BESS and Wartsila Power Islands into the Utility Operations Center, and 4) construct the Wartsila Power Island.
4. Resolution Amending Resolution 22-189, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an EP contract with Wartsila in the not to exceed amount of $108,555,800 plus a 15% contingency of $16,283,370 to provide and deliver the engineering design and equipment for the Wartsila Power Island.
5. Resolution of Appropriations
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for November 14, 2023 Calendar
299 of 895
2 d 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Grayson Repowering Project (Project), approved by City Council, consists of three primary phases - the first of which - Unit 9 Separation, is complete. The next two phases require amending existing contracts and executing new contracts for these services to continue moving forward:
• Unit 9 Separation: includes the decoupling of Unit 9 from the rest of the power plant that is presently under demolition; Unit 9 decoupling ensures its continued use as a power resource during demolition and construction. • Demolition and Site Improvement: includes hazardous material abatement (principally asbestos remediation), demolition, disposal/recycling, structural backfill, and site geotechnical improvement; and,
• Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC): includes replacing the obsolete control system on Unit 9, a 75-megawatt (MW) / 300-megawatt-hour battery energy storage system, the 3-engine 56 MW Wartsila power plant, and associated facilities.
This report provides detailed background and analysis of the project status, new constraints and opportunities, anticipated costs, proposed contracts and amendments, and a review of next steps.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the following actions associated with the Project:
1. Increase in the contingency amount for the existing Silverado contract for demolition services by $10,000,000 to a new not-to-exceed amount of $15,443,747.
2. Amendment to the existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with ARB in an amount not-to-exceed $330,000 to a new not-to-exceed amount of $630,000.
3. Enter into a new contract with ARB for the Balance of Site (BOS) EPC in an amount not-to-exceed $362,700,000 plus a 10% ($36,270,000) reserve for contingency; and,
4. Enter into a new contract with Wartsila for the engineering and procurement of the Wartsila Power Island in an amount not-to-exceed $108,555,800 plus a 15% ($16,283,370) reserve for contingency.
5. Adopt a resolution appropriating the required funds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Project evolved from the need to replace the existing aging power plant facilities as they could not meet current or future operational necessities or environmental obligations. In response, GWP developed repowering plans to continue delivering reliable energy to the residents of Glendale into the future. The Project was therefore designed to:
1) Provide reliable electrical service.
2) Accommodate future growth in load as predicted by the Integrated Resource Plan, and within recent years, account for growth in load due to growth in energy demand as driven by building electrification and electric vehicles. 300 of 895 3 d 8
3) Meet nationally recognized electric reliability requirements including protection against the N-1 and N-1-1 contingencies.
4) Comply with current and forthcoming South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) air emissions regulations.
As discussed in detail during the environmental review and entitlement processes, GWP operates in an environment where electric power import capability is limited by existing transmission capacity; the Grayson Power Plant (Grayson) units were old, and (excluding Unit 9) could not operate in compliance with SCAQMD requirements past December 2023 while meeting the Project objectives, and electric load is expected to grow. GWP has addressed these challenges through rooftop solar and demand response programs that were re-vamped as part of the Local and Regional Renewable, Low-Carbon, and Zero Carbon Energy and Capacity Resource Options to Serve the City of Glendale otherwise known as the “Clean Energy” Request For Proposals (RFP), the Biogas Renewable Generation Project to recover energy that is otherwise lost through flaring, and lastly, repowering the Grayson.
The Project has been subjected to a protracted licensing and procurement process. The original Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) was published in 2018. The Partially Recirculated Draft EIR addressing the change to the Wartsila engines and inclusion of battery storage was published in August 2021. The City Council made the final decision on the number of engines in December 2022.
During that four-year period, Project costs have significantly escalated due to:
1. Changes in national codes that significantly impacted site improvement costs,
2. Inflation and supply chain impacts,
3. Increasing demand for electrical equipment to support the mandates for build-out of renewable and storage projects,
4. The removal of Tesla as a potential battery supplier,
5. The loss of the planned use of a Disney lot for laydown of GWP materials to free up on-site space for storage of project related materials, and
6. The loss of the south side of the Verdugo Wash for construction parking.
All these issues were exacerbated by permitting delays. Specific examples of factors resulting in cost increases include:
1. As part of their response to the Clean Energy RFP in July 2018, one of the EPC proposals that Wartsila provided was for a three-engine plant at a cost of less than $80 million. A subsequent five-engine EPC proposal from Wartsila for approximately $150 million (or about $100 million for three engines) expired December 15, 2021. Today, that same three engine power island will cost GWP approximately $200 million. While there have been some small changes in work scope, mostly reduction due to the elimination of piles associated with soil improvements, the basic conclusion remains the same that project cost has increased significantly during the intervening years.
301 of 895
4 d 8
2. In response to the Clean Energy RFP, GWP received several 75 MW/300 MWH BESS EPC proposals in August 2018 ranging in cost from $100-130 million.
Today, the same 75 MW/300 MWH BESS EPC cost is expected to be approximately $204 million. Again, while there have been some small changes in work scope, the basic conclusion remains the same.
3. Part of the cost increase in the BESS Power Island is due to no longer being able to contract with Tesla. The Tesla system had the advantage that each inverter/battery Megapack package self-supplied its own 480 volt (V) auxiliary loads such as controls and cooling. Other battery systems do not self-supply these loads necessitating a separate 480 V auxiliary power distribution system being installed to supply power to each inverter/battery package. This added several million dollars to the cost of the BESS Power Island.
4. As originally planned, construction parking was going to be located on the south side of the Verdugo Wash, where parking for the demolition work force is located today. However, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO) now has a project (Doran Street Grade Separation Improvements) that will likely preclude that space from being used by GWP for any purpose after demolition is completed. This has necessitated finding an alternate off-site parking location from which the workers will be bused to and from Grayson. In addition to the cost of leasing the parking space and the busing, the city must also pay the union craft for the travel time. This has the potential of adding over $10 million in cost to the Project.
Project delays have also impacted the Project schedule by much more than a day-forday basis. Much of this is due to the worldwide emphasis on building renewable and energy storage projects. These projects have created a strong demand for electrical equipment – transformers, switchgear, and batteries – that Grayson requires. Thus, equipment lead times and pricing have increased commensurately. For example, transformers in the size range we need used to have lead times of nine to twelve months, but now 24 months or more.
The Project permitting delays have delayed the completion by at least two years and added over $200 million to the total cost. This report does not include an analysis of cost impacts due to the City’s decision not to move forward with the Project in 2018, and to instead proceed with the Clean Energy RFP process, which resulted in Project revisions and an extended California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review and certification process that was not completed until February 15, 2022. Per Council’s direction, the modified Project authorization to proceed with the Wartsila Power Island with a three-engine configuration instead of the five-engine configuration recommended by GWP staff was not given until December 2022.
Today, GWP faces the same challenges that precipitated the need to repower Grayson:
302 of 895
5 d 8
1) GWP’s peak load has in the past exceeded GWP’s available import capacity through the Pacific DC Intertie, the Southwest Transmission System, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP), and the Magnolia Power Project. This exceedance is expected to continue.
2) Growth in energy demand due to building electrification and electric vehicles is expected to broaden the peak and raise the minimum load. While much of this can be addressed via imported energy, imported energy alone cannot meet peak load needs. Local renewable generation and demand response programs can help mitigate these increases in demand but have not yet materialized as hoped. 3) Even though the bulk of Glendale’s electrical energy is imported, GWP is still required to maintain adequate reserves to protect against the N-1 and N-1-1 contingencies. LADWP reiterated this fact in a meeting with two City Council members, City Manager and GWP General Manager confirming this fact in written correspondence with GWP previously. If GWP is lacking adequate resources, GWP is expected to shed load (i.e., temporarily interrupt the delivery of electricity to customers) to maintain adequate reserves. 4) Grayson’s older generating units, except for Unit 9, were nearing obsolescence jeopardizing both the ability to serve peak load and system reliability.
Additionally, SCAQMD Rule 1135 prohibited operation of the older units after December 31, 2023, as they could not be upgraded to meet the Project objectives with the new rule requirements due to their lengthy startup times and lower efficiency. These older units are currently nearly 50% demolished.
GWP continues to need reliable and fast starting generation resources to help assure reliable service to the residents of Glendale. GWP is therefore recommending that the City Council approve the BOS EPC and Wartsila contracts as detailed below.
Demolition and Site Improvement Contract Contingency Amount Amendment On September 21, 2021, the City Council via Resolution No. 21-147, dispensed with competitive bidding and authorized the issuance of an RFP for the demolition and site (soil) improvement of the Grayson facility in connection with the Project. Eighteen months later, on March 21, 2023, the City Council authorized the contract with Silverado for the demolition of Grayson, (except Unit 9), and for improving the site geotechnical properties through a soil improvement program. The contract’s authorized not-toexceed amount is $27,218,735, with a 20% contingency in the amount of $5,443,747.
During the development of the scope of work for the Demolition and Soil Improvement RFP, GWP performed a comprehensive review of the site including:
• Drawing reviews,
• Physical inspections of the plant site, Boiler Building, and equipment except as limited by physical constraints around operating equipment inside the Boiler Building and Glendale Rack,
• Test borings around the site including the fuel bunkers and Glendale Rack, areas 303 of 895 6 d 8
known to have been occupied by oil-filled equipment and infrastructure within them, and
• developing quantity estimates for the abatement of different types of unit price rates for hazardous materials that would need to be mitigated such as asbestos and oil contaminated soil.
Silverado is approximately 70% finished with the abatement work, 60% with the demolition work, and 50% overall including site improvement work. Based on current progress and knowledge of what was discovered at the site, and the application of unit price rates for various expected hazardous material conditions and quantities, the expected cost at completion for the Demolition and Site Improvement RFP scope is approximately $650,000 above the base proposal price of approximately $27.2 million.
This is due to the inaccessibility of certain areas prior to the commencement of demolition work, including subterranean areas.
During the course of the abatement and demolition work, additional hazardous materials and locations were identified that must be abated:
• Asbestos that was contained within the double layer steel walls of boiler Nos. 3, 4, and 5 air preheaters. (This could not have been seen until the walls were opened.)
• Asbestos insulation on the boiler water heater tanks. (Due to their location and operating conditions, this could not have been seen and/or sampled when the hazardous material surveys were performed while Grayson was still operating.) • Underground asbestos-cement pipe that did not appear on drawings.
The estimated cost of these three items at completion is approximately $1 million. The first two items were included in Change Order No.1 ($453,641.30).
Additionally, the Grayson site is geotechnically challenging and may be subject to liquefaction during a seismic event. The Demolition and Site Improvement RFP specified the installation of stone columns and wick drains to mitigate the liquefaction issues. Wartsila intended to drive piles to support the new equipment foundations (the existing foundations at Grayson that are being removed are also pile supported). In Silverado’s original proposal, as a value engineering option, they proposed using a Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) approach in lieu of the stone columns and wick drains that were specified in the Demolition and Site Improvement RFP.
GWP has elected to proceed with Silverado’s use of DSM, as that will eliminate the need to drive piles (and eliminate the associated construction noise) and would also mitigate the potential for liquefaction. Elimination of the stone columns and wick drains produced a savings of approximately $9.1 million. The estimated cost to perform DSM under the Wartsila Power Island is approximately $9.4 million. At $9.4 million, DSM is less costly than pile driving and represents a net savings of more than $1 million.
Additionally, DSM is a quieter and less disruptive process because it eliminates repeated pounding from driving piles.
With respect to the BESS Power Island, Tesla had stated that compaction, along with 304 of 895 7 d 8
the stone columns and wick drains, would be sufficient for their BESS. However, in having to switch from Tesla to another BESS vendor, as was the case with Wartsila, improvements to the site soil conditions are now required beyond only the soil compaction that Tesla required. This is an added scope to the Silverado contract and to the Project as a whole. The final layout of the BESS Power Island is still in process and thus the DSM design cannot yet be finalized. DSM work under the BESS Power Island is estimated to cost $5.6 million. The total estimated net cost of all DSM work is approximately $6 million.
There are also several miscellaneous demolition scope changes that are being recommended:
• Removal of underground infrastructure in the West Road. While not required for the Project per se, given all the demolition work being performed at this time, it is relatively easy to deal with this issue now and avoid a more complicated demolition sometime in the future. The estimated cost of this item is approximately $165,000.
• With the demolition of the Boiler Building, the Unit 9 controls were relocated to a temporary trailer as part of the Unit 9 Separation work. ARB, the Unit 9 Separation contractor, was servicing the restroom holding tanks, but with that contract coming to a close we are transferring the servicing to Silverado with an estimated not-to-exceed cost of $28,000.
• The Grayson soil has performed better than was expected and thus it was possible to reduce the scope of the temporary shoring work for a savings of $22,000.
• During the court ordered stay in response to the Glendale Residents Against Environmental Destruction request, it was necessary to remove scaffolding that had been erected with the plan of attaching it to the Boiler Building structural steel. Since the stay prohibited further demolition and abatement of the Boiler Building, and attaching the scaffolding would have necessitated cutting holes in the Boiler Building siding, it was necessary to remove the scaffolding. This had a cost impact of approximately $20,000.
• Some work may be required to improve the soil in the former Glendale Rack area where the Wartsila engines will be assembled. We are setting aside $100,000 to cover the cost of this potential work.
The above miscellaneous changes, with an estimated total cost of approximately $335,000, are much smaller in magnitude than the other project needs. Of the miscellaneous changes, there is only one that is discretionary, removal of the West Road underground infrastructure. GWP recommends approval of this use of contingency because it could yield far greater savings in the future.
The combined net estimated cost of the DSM for the Wartsila and BESS Power Islands ($6 million), abatement of the previously unknown hazardous materials ($1 million), the potential increase in contract unit price rate items ($650,000), as well as the miscellaneous changes ($335,000) results in a total of more than $7 million which exceeds the available contingency. Given that demolition/site improvement work is 50% complete overall with significantly more work yet to be completed, GWP is 305 of 895 8 d 8
requesting that the original contingency amount of $5,443,747 be increased by $10 million for a new contingency amount of $15,443,747 or approximately 57% of the contract price.
BOS EPC Contract and PSA Amendment
On August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-127 authorizing the use of the alternative project delivery method pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC) Chapter 4.13, for the engineering, procurement and construction of the BOS for the Project.
City Council adopted Resolution 23-70 on June 6, 2023, dispensing with competitive bidding, authorizing the General Manager to directly negotiate with ARB for the BOS EPC contract, and awarded a PSA to ARB to refine their conceptual design, schedule, and an indicative price for their Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) and BOS scope of work as a prelude to completing a full engineering, procurement, and construction contract with ARB. The indicative price developed under the PSA would be used as the basis for the subsequent EPC agreement, and after engineering is sufficiently advanced and long-lead equipment production slots are secured under a Limited Notice to Proceed (LNTP), the pricing would be refined based upon the more up-to-date and detailed information, converting the agreement to a firm price contract and issuing a Full Notice to Proceed (FNTP).
As part of ARB’s effort to develop their indicative price, they have received budgetary quotation with lengthening, and in some cases unacceptable long lead times for major electrical equipment such as transformers and switchgear. It is important to note that ARB and their partner POWER Engineers, Inc. are also engaged in other projects for which they are receiving informal quotations and delivery estimates for long lead electrical equipment. The quotes are currently reflecting significant increases in lead times and costs which increases are likely attributable to the high demand and heavy emphasis on building out renewables and energy storage.
As part of Amendment No. 1 to the ARB EPC PSA, ARB and its engineering subcontractor would proceed to perform the necessary engineering to support development of procurement specifications for long-lead electrical equipment and obtain formal quotations. Once the EPC contract is authorized, and executed, ARB can immediately begin procuring these items under the LNTP reducing the risk to the project schedule and future cost increases.
Following the City Council’s decision to proceed with only three engines for the Wartsila Power Island, GWP and Wartsila resumed negotiating the EPC contract. While the engineering and procurement portions of the contract are essentially complete, the negotiations for the construction portion of the contract have dragged on due to, among other things:
• Inflationary pressures on construction costs
306 of 895
9 d 8
• Alternatives to the use of Disney lot for GWP material laydown space, and the impending loss of the construction parking space on the south side of Verdugo Wash.
• Uncertainties associated with customary EPC practices in the United States • Escalating risk management requirements within Wartsila due to recent EPC experience on other projects.
Ultimately, GWP concluded there was too great an uncertainty as to whether an acceptable EPC agreement could be reached with Wartsila in a timely manner. That led GWP to decide to reassign the construction portion of the Wartsila Power Island EPC scope of work to ARB who will be performing the work including the BESS and BOS. Wartsila will continue to be responsible for completion of the detailed engineering and supply of all equipment as well as technical support for construction and commissioning.
This decision was based upon:
• EPC negotiations with ARB for the BESS and BOS were largely complete, • ARB is an experienced EPC contractor within the United States, and • GWP and ARB have a long history of working together at Grayson.
As ARB will now become responsible for the construction of the Wartsila Power Island, Amendment No. 1 to the ARB EPC PSA also provides the funds for ARB having reviewed the Wartsila Power Island design and equipment, and developing their indicative price to construct it. This indicative price is added to their indicative price for their original BESS and BOS scope of work.
Based on the preliminary engineering and cost estimating work that ARB has been performing, ARB has developed an EPC proposal with indicative pricing based upon their conceptual designs for:
• The BESS Power Island, and
• The BOS work to integrate the BESS and Wartsila Power Islands into the Utility Operations Center.
In addition, ARB has developed indicative pricing to construct the Wartsila Power Island. This proposal consists of five major pricing elements:
1. An indicative price to complete the engineering design for the BOS and BESS Power Island.
2. An indicative price for procurement of the equipment for the BOS and BESS Power Island.
3. An indicative price for construction of the BOS, BESS Power Island, and the Wartsila Power Island.
4. Allowances, to be spent on a time and material (T&M) basis, that were requested to be included by the BOS EPC RFP (i.e.: temporary trailers, new building furnishings, spare parts, etc.). 307 of 895
10 d 8
5. Allowances to be spent on a T&M basis to cover needed items that cannot be definitively priced at this time (i.e.: off-site laydown and parking, ministerial permits, traffic control, etc.).
Under the EPC contract, there will be an initial “open book” (the LNTP) phase to:
• Refine the conceptual design,
• Begin the detailed engineering design,
• Specify and secure production slots for long-lead equipment, • Complete construction planning, and
• Develop a lump sum (fixed) price to complete the scope of work.
During this “open book” phase ARB will work with GWP in a very transparent manner sharing their estimates and quotations so that GWP has a high degree of visibility into how ARB develops their proposed final EPC price for the project.
The indicative price for the complete BOS EPC scope including construction of the Wartsila Power island is $362,700,000. Of that amount, $43,102,000 is allocated to the LNTP phase. Any unspent LNTP funds would roll into the FNTP phase.
Below is a price breakdown of the LNTP phase.
Scope Cost
ARB Preconstruction Support (T&M) $ 862,500
BESS Engineering and Secure BESS Production Slots $30,429,000 Secure BESS Generator Step-Up Transformers and BESS and BOS Power Distribution Centers Production Slots $ 4,048,000 Engineering Design $ 4,312,500
Payment & Performance Bond $ 3,450,000
Total $43,102,000
The LNTP portion of the ARB EPC agreement, totaling approximately $43 million, will initially be funded using GWP cash reserves. Bond financing would be in place prior to a FNTP which both fund the balance of the EPC agreement, approximately $319 million, and replenish GWP cash reserves.
Once the final lump sum price is agreed upon by GWP and ARB, the contract would convert to a fixed price EPC contract to complete the work. The expectation is that the final price would be less than the indicative price as the engineering progresses. The requested Council approval and authorization will provide the GWP staff the ability to negotiate, and the City Manager the ability to enter into, the contract for the final phase and price within the parameters of the already approved not to exceed amount, and for GWP to issue the FNTP.
GWP is requesting 10% contingency in the amount of $36,270,000 for the BOS EPC contract to cover potential added costs due to costs that exceed the amount of the 308 of 895 11 d 8
included allowances, and other potential contingencies.
Wartsila EP Contract
On August 16, 2022, City Council also adopted a motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a PSA with Wartsila for Phase 2 Limited Notice to Proceed Engineering Services for the Grayson Project. Under this PSA, Wartsila has been performing engineering for the Wartsila Power Island sufficient to complete the foundation designs.
The final design review for this effort is schedule to occur in mid-December 2023.
On December 13, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-189 authorizing the City Manager to execute an EPC agreement with Wartsila North America, Inc. for the three engine Wartsila Power Island with a not to exceed price of up to $170,000,000.
Due to prolonged contract negotiations with Wartsila for the final EPC contract for the Wartsila Power Island, GWP has decided to move the construction scope for the Wartsila Power Island to ARB for the reasons discussed earlier. Wartsila will continue to be responsible for completion of the detailed engineering and supply of all equipment as well as technical support for construction and commissioning.
Based on the engineering work that Wartsila has performed, and their work with their suppliers to obtain the equipment engineering inputs for the foundation designs, coupled with the change in their work scope, Wartsila has developed a proposal for their work to complete the engineering design, supply all the equipment, and commission the Wartsila Power Island. This proposal, valued at $108,555,800, consists of three major elements:
1. A not-to-exceed price to complete the engineering design.
2. A not-to-exceed price for procurement of the equipment.
3. Allowances, to be spent on a T&M basis, to cover needed items that cannot be definitively priced at this time including:
a. Equipment transportation costs
b. Field support during construction
c. Field support during commissioning, which is subject to a cap, and d. Spare parts.
GWP is requesting 15% contingency in the amount of $16,283,370 for the Wartsila EP contract to cover potential added costs due to:
1. Changes in Dollar/Euro exchange rates (Wartsila is based in Finland),
2. Costs that exceed the amount of the included allowances, and
3. Other potential contingencies.
The first six milestone payments of the Wartsila EP contract, which total 45% of the contract price, will initially be funded using GWP cash reserves. 309 of 895 12 d 8
Milestone
Number Milestone % of total Contract Price
1 Effective Date NTP - Down Payment 20%
2 Engine Order Placed 5%
3 GSU, Auxiliary, and Alternate Feed Transformers and
Switchgear Ordered 5%
4 Provide Interface, earthworks and foundation Design 2% 5 Engineering Submitted 3%
6 Engines Product Conformity Test (PCT) 10%
The six milestone payments total $48,850,110 and cover the first ten months of the contract. That provides adequate time to secure bond financing and replace GWP’s cash reserves.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
GWP intends to fund the Grayson Repowering Project through issuance of bonds. On July 19, 2016, and July 23, 2019, the City Council adopted Bond Reimbursement Resolutions which allow the City to recoup expenditures made for the Grayson Project development from bond proceeds, when bonds are issued for the project. Staff will be presenting a bond ordinance to City Council in the coming months after approval of a new rate plan. Some of the initial project costs will be fronted with GWP’s cash reserves which will be replenished with bond proceeds. The resolutions approving these contracts will authorize the execution of the contracts upon the effective date of the rate plan and the City Manager’s determination that the rate plan will be sufficient to issue the bonds in the amounts sufficient to fund the contracts.
The Silverado Demolition and Site Improvement Contract Contingency Amount Amendment will cost $10,000,000 which was not included as a part of the FY 2023-24 approved budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $10,000,000 from GWP’s Electric Surplus Fund Balance. The appropriation request is outlined below:
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $10,000,000 GL: 27900-5810-GWP0000GL: 43110-5830-
GWP-0020-P0000-
PL: GWP00171BN
Net Position,
Electric Surplus
Fund Balance
The ARB BOS EPC Contract LNTP phase and PSA Amendment No. 1 will cost $43,432,000 plus 10% ($4,343,200) which was not included as a part of the FY 2023-24 approved budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of a total $47,412,200 from GWP’s Electric Surplus Fund Balance. The appropriation request is 310 of 895 13 d 8
outlined below:
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $47,412,200 GL: 27900-5810-GWP0000GL: 43110-5830-
GWP-0020-P0000-
PL: GWP00171CN
Net Position,
Electric Surplus
Fund Balance
The first six milestone payments of the Wartsila EP Contract will cost $48,850,110 plus 15% ($7,327,517) which was not included as a part of the FY 2023-24 approved budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of a total $56,177,627 from GWP’s Electric Surplus Fund Balance. The appropriation request is outlined below:
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $56,177,627 GL: 27900-5810-GWP0000GL: 43110-5830-
GWP-0020-P0000-
PL: GWP00170CN
Net Position,
Electric Surplus
Fund Balance
The ARB BOS EPC Contract FNTP phase and the remaining Wartsila EP Contract milestone payments will be budgeted in the subsequent two fiscal years and paid for with bond funding.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On February 15, 2022, the City certified a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Grayson Repowering Project (“Project”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (14 Cal Code Regs. 15000 et seq. and Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) The Project includes all aspects of Project implementation, including, demolition and site improvements as well as mitigation monitoring and reporting. The action presented to the City Council here involves the authorization of an amendment to the PSA with ARB, an increase to the contingency amount for the Silverado contract, the BOS EPC contract, and the Wartsila EP contract to complete the project. All actions are funding actions that are withing the scope of the Project in certified FEIR.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744, the attachment to this Report contains the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest or more in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item. Attached as Exhibits 1, 2 and 3, respectively, are the Campaign Finance Disclosures for ARB, Wartsila and Silverado.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Do not authorize and approve the actions described herein. However, doing so would delay the implementation of the Grayson Project. 311 of 895 14 d 8
Alternative 2: Consider any other alternatives not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Mark Young, General Manager - GWP
Prepared by:
Scott Mellon, P.E., Assistant General Manager - Power Management Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Finance Disclosure for ARB, Inc.,
Exhibit 2: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Wartsila North America, Inc., Exhibit 3: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Silverado Contractors, Inc. 312 of 895
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes:
1. An increase of $10,000,000 in the contingency for the Demolition and Site Improvement for contract, Contract No. 8002075, with Silverado Contractors, Inc. (Silverado), for the Grayson Repowering Project (RFP No. 3905), for the reasons set forth in the November 14, 2023 Report by the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power. The Contract’s total contingency, with the increase, must not exceed $15,443,747.
2. The City Manager, or his designee, to execute Contract Change Order(s) which must be consistent with the additional work.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
313 of 895
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute Amendment No. 1 to the City’s existing Professional Services Agreement - Contract No. 8002155 (PSA) with ARB, Inc. (ARB), to increase the not to exceed amount by $330,000 and to add the following to the PSA’s scope of work relating to the Grayson Repowering Project Balance of Site (BOS) Engineer Procure Construct (EPC) contract: 1) develop an indicative construction cost for the Wartsila Power Island, and 2) perform the necessary engineering to support and prepare procurement documents for long lead electrical equipment and 3) then obtain formal quotations, for a new not to exceed amount of $630,000. The City Manager, or a designee, is authorized to execute said Amendment No. 1 subject to approval by the City Attorney.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
314 of 895
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING, AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH ARB, INC. FOR THE BLANACE OF SITE ENGINEER, PROCURE
AND CONSTRUCT (EPC) EFFORT FOR THE GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT WHEREAS, on August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22- 127 authorizing the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power Department (GWP) to utilize an alternative project delivery method pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC) Chapter 4.13, for the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) of the Balance of Site (BOS), via Resolution No. 18-205, for the Grayson Repowering Project (Project); and
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2023, GWP issued the Grayson Repowering Project BOS EPC Request For Proposals (RFP) – Specification No. 3646; and WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, GWP issued the revised RFP – Specification No. 3646R – which was again posted on the City’s website, eBidboard.com and emailed to thirty companies inclusive of those who were notified of the original BOS EPC RFP and the attendees at the February 23, 2023 meeting; and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2023 a mandatory pre-proposal conference was held with a total of six different companies and one general contractor attending; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2023, in accordance with the BOS EPC RFP instructions only one company – ARB, Inc. (ARB) – submitted its minimum qualifications in advance of the proposal deadline; and
WHEREAS, GWP staff reviewed the qualifications information submitted by ARB and found ARB qualified to act as the BOS EPC contractor; and WHEREAS, Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Section 9, provides an exemption to competitive bidding where the Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and
WHEREAS, given the background described above for the BOS EPC RFP, and the need to avoid further delays, on June 6, 2023, the City Council found adequate justification and in the City’s best interest to dispense with competitive bidding, and adopted Resolution No. 23-70 authorizing the General Manager of GWP, or his designee, to negotiate directly with ARB towards a contract for the Grayson Repowering Project BOS EPC, and return to the City Council with the results of the negotiation for further consideration; and
WHEREAS, the General Manager of GWP and his staff have engaged in extensive negotiations with ARB over the past several months and ARB and in the course of said negotiations GWP staff has determined that it would be prudent to move the construction scope of the Wartsila Power Island to ARB’s BOS EPC Contract (Wartsila North America, Inc., under a separate contract, will continue to be responsible 315 of 895
2 for the completion of detailed engineering and supply of all equipment as well as technical support for construction and commission); and WHEREAS, based on the negotiations with ARB and the scope of work to be performed by ARB, as described in detail in the Report Dated November 14, 2023 by the General Manager of GWP, staff is requesting that Council authorize an EPC Contract with ARB in the not to exceed amount of $362,700,000 plus a 10% contingency of $36,270,000 to 1) serve as the EPC for the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Power Island, 2) serve as the EPC for the Balance of Site (BOS) work, 3) integration of the BESS and Wartsila Power Islands into the Utility Operations Center, and 4) construct the Wartsila Power Island.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
Section 1: The foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct, and are a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding, and authorizing the award of an Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) Contract for the Balance of Site (BOS) work for the Grayson Repowering Project to ARB, Inc. (ARB).
Section 2: The City Council hereby dispenses with competitive bidding and authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an EPC Contract with ARB the Grayson Repowering Project BOS work.
Section 3: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute an EPC Contract with ARB for the BOS work, as described in the Report Dated November 14, 2023 by the General Manger of GWP, in the not to exceed amount of $362,700,000 plus a 10% contingency of $36,270,000 subject to the conditions outlined in Section 4 of this Resolution, below.
Section 4: The City Manager, or his designee, shall enter into and execute the herein-referenced and authorized EPC Contract with ARB after the effective date of the ordinance adopting a new electric rate plan as proposed by the Report to Council and Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) considered on November 14, 2023, and a determination by the City Manager that the rate plan and bond financing for the project will be sufficient to pay for said EPC contract with ARB.
Section 5: The form of the EPC Contract with ARB shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2023.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk
316 of 895
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _______________ was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ______ day of ______________________, 2023, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________
City Clerk
317 of 895
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 22-189 (WHICH AMENDED
RESOLUTION 22-34 TO PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT UTILIZING
THREE WARTSILA ENGINES) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR
HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH WARTSILA NORTH
AMERICA, INC. FOR THE ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT OF THREE
WARTSILA ENGINES AND ASSOCIATED POWER ISLAND EQUIPMENT
AND FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the City’s aging Grayson Power Plant is experiencing an increasing frequency in unplanned and forced outages, which threaten local reliability; and
WHEREAS, a majority of the existing generation units at the Grayson Power Plant would no longer be allowed to continue operating beyond 2023 without major air quality retrofits to meet South Coast Air Quality Management District emissions limits; and
WHEREAS, without the Grayson Power Plant, the City will not have sufficient sources of power to meet energy demand within the City while maintaining sufficient power reserves; and
WHEREAS, Glendale Water and Power Department (“GWP”) studied Alternative 7, the Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative (Battery Energy Storage System combined with five reciprocating internal combustion engines), as one of the Project Alternatives for the Grayson Repowering Project in the 2022 Final Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2016121048 (“2022 Final EIR”), as an option to repower the existing Grayson Power Plant and determined the Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative would meet the proposed Project objectives and would result in the fewest potential environmental impacts when compared to the proposed Project and other Alternatives evaluated; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-28, Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Grayson Repowering Project, and making certain findings and determinations; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-29 approving Grayson Repowering Alternative 7 (Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative), adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Making Findings in support thereof, adopting a Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program, and directing staff to take actions in furtherance thereof; and 318 of 895
2 WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-34, amending City Council Resolution No. 22-29 whereby it modified Alternative 7 and provided direction relating to same as follows:
“Section 2. Alternative 7 of the Grayson Repowering Project, the Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative, defined herein as:
• A 75 MW/300 MWH energy storage system;
• Five Wartsila reciprocating internal combustion engine units producing approximately 93 MW net at average annual site conditions;
• A new switching station; and
• Related facilities.
as approved and adopted on February 15, 2022, Alternative 7 shall be modified such that staff is directed not to purchase Wartsila engines until a decision regarding their purchase is made by City Council in December 2022, or earlier if directed by the City Council.”
WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, the City Council by Resolution No. 22-34, also amended Section 5 of City Council Resolution 22-29 and directed staff as follows:
“Section 3. Section 5 of the City Council Resolution No. 22-29 is hereby amended and replaced with the following Section 5:
‘Section 5. In furtherance of the Council’s selection of the Alternative 7 Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative to repower the Grayson Power Plant, Staff is hereby directed to proceed with the following:
a. Separation of Unit 9 from the Grayson Power Plant;
b. Demolition of Grayson Power Plant Units 1-8 and environmental remediation and the Grayson site;
c. Procurement of the Tesla Battery Energy Storage System; d. Necessary engineering, procurement, and construction to integrate the Tesla Battery Energy Storage System into the Grayson site; e. Necessary engineering, procurement, and construction to prepare for the potential addition of up to five Wartsila engines at Grayson 319 of 895
3 should Council decide to proceed with any number of these engines;
f. Air permits and procurement of emissions reduction credits for the five Wartsila engines;
g. All required bonding to finance the above.’
Staff is further directed to return to City Council no later than the end of Calendar Year 2022 for a decision regarding the purchase of Wartsila engines.”
WHEREAS, on August 16, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 22- 127 authorizing the General Manager of GWP to utilize the Alternative Project Delivery Method pursuant to Chapter 4.13 of the Glendale Municipal Code (“GMC”) for the engineering, procurement, and construction of the Balance of Site (“BOS”) for the Grayson Repowering Project; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-189 which amended Resolution 22-34 to provide direction to staff regarding the implementation of the Grayson Repowering Project utilizing three Wartsila engines (a copy of Resolution 22-34 is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated by herein by reference);
WHEREAS, Resolution 22-34, Section III, Subsection 4, authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute a contract with Wartsila North America, Inc. (Wartsila) for the procurement, engineering, construction and commissioning services for 3 Wartsila engines and associated equipment and infrastructure within Wartsila power island as described in the 2022 Final EIR, in the not to exceed amount of $170,000,000 subject to City Council’s authorization for financing; and
WHEREAS, as explained in the Report Dated November 14, 2023 by the General Manager of GWP, due to prolonged contract negotiations with Wartsila for the final Engineer, Procure Construct (EPC) contract for the Wartsila Power Island, GWP has decided to move the construction scope for the Wartsila Power Island to ARB, Inc. under a separate contract, and enter into a contract with Wartsila for the completion of the detailed engineering and supply of the three engines, all equipment, as well as technical support for construction and commissioning; and
WHEREAS, because of the modified scope of work by Wartsila as explained above and the Report Dated November 14, 2023, the contract price for Wartsila has been modified downward; and
WHEREAS, given the foregoing, the City Council hereby amends 320 of 895
4 Resolution 22-189, Section III, Subsections 4 and 5, in order to authorize an Engineering and Procurement contract award to Wartsila, subject to certain conditions precedent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Glendale, California that:
Section 1. The foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of the findings in support this Resolution.
Section 2. The City Council, based on the Report Dated November 14, 2023 by the General Manager of GWP, authorizes the implementation of the Grayson Repowering Project utilizing three Wartsila engines as described in the 2022 Final EIR.
Section 3. The City Council hereby modifies and replaces Section III, Subsections 4 and 5 of Resolution No. 22-189 and as follows:
“III. Purchase of 3 Wartsila Engines:
Section 4. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute a contract with Wartsila North America, Inc. (Wartsila) for the purchase, engineering, and technical support for construction and commissioning services for 3 Wartsila engines and associated equipment for the Wartsila Power Island as described in the 2022 Final EIR, in the not to exceed amount of $108,555,800 plus a 15% contingency of $16,283,370, as well as any related and necessary supplemental documents to the herein authorized contract subject to the conditions outlined in Section 5 of below.
Section 5. The City Manager, or his designee, shall enter into and execute the herein-referenced and authorized procurement, engineering and technical support for construction and commissioning services with Wartsila after the effective date of the ordinance adopting a new electric rate plan as proposed by the Report to Council and Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) considered on November 14, 2023, and a determination by the City Manager that the rate plan and bond financing for the project will be sufficient to pay for said contract with Wartsila.”
Section 6. The form of the contract with Wartsila shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney.
321 of 895
5 Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2023.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _______________ was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ______ day of ______________________, 2023, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________
City Clerk
322 of 895
323 of 895
324 of 895
325 of 895
326 of 895
327 of 895
328 of 895
329 of 895
330 of 895
Exhibit No. 1
331 of 895
ꢀ2ꢁꢂ'%-)ꢃꢂ-')ꢄ*ꢅꢆꢆꢇ8
ꢍ3##8ꢎꢏ$ꢊ
ꢈꢉ$ꢊ8 ꢋꢌꢌ)ꢊ*+8
ꢐ!.#ꢊ8 ꢒ!18
&QASd`Idf^\
ꢑ2*!&ꢊ+,8ꢋꢌꢌ)ꢊ++8 ꢀ/ꢉ0 8 ꢓ"(8
&QSIL )pIEjhSlI 1LLSEId ꢀꢁ3dIfSGI\h
&QSIL 1`IdAhS\O 1LLSEId
&QSIL +S\A\ESAW 1LLSEId
%^AdG ^L (SdIEh^df
/^dI hQA\ꢀꢁꢂS\hIdIfh ^n\Id
ꢃꢃ ꢄ6jCE^\hdAEh^dꢅ Sf hQI `Idf^\ꢆ I\hShqꢆ ^d ^dOA\SuAhS^\ hQAh QAf I\hIdIG S\h^ A E^\hdAEh L^d hQI `IdL^dZA\EI ^L AWW ^d A `^dhS^\ ^L hQI n^dU j\GIdhAUI\ j\GId A\ AOdIIZI\h nShQ A\ AdEQShIEhꢆ GIfSO\ `d^LIffS^\AWꢆ I\OS\IIdꢆ ^d OI\IdAW ^d `dSZI E^\hdAEhꢆ jfjAWWq Cq A OI\IdAW ^d `dSZI E^\hdAEh^dꢇ 6jCE^\hdAEh^d S\EWjGIf A\q ZIZCId ^L hQAh `Idf^\ꢈfꢆ I\hShqꢈfꢆ ^d ^dOA\SuAhS^\ꢈf %^AdG ^L (SdIEh^dfꢆ Shf&QASd`Idf^\ꢆ &QSIL )pIEjhSlI 1LLSEIdꢆ &QSIL +S\A\ESAW 1LLSEIdꢆ &QSIL 1`IdAhS\O 1NSEIdꢆ A\q `Idf^\ nShQ A\ ^n\IdfQS` S\hIdIfh ^L Z^dI hQA\ hI\ `IdEI\h ꢉꢀꢁꢂꢊ S\ hQAh`Idf^\ꢆ I\hShqꢆ ^d ^dOA\SuAhS^\ꢆ A\G A\q EAZ`ASO\ E^ZZShhII hQAh Sf ^n\IG ^d E^\hd^WWIG Cq hQAh `Idf^\ꢆI\hShqꢆ^d ^dOA\SuAhS^\ꢋ #C^lI `WIAfI GSfEW^fI hQIfI `Idf^\fꢌ\AZI A\G CjfS\Iff AGGdIffꢋ 'B[aBTP] '_[[TiiJJ _o]JH _e F_]ie_XXJH Drꢍꢔꢕꢕꢕ4ꢀ5ꢁ6ꢀ7ꢂꢃꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢕꢖ ꢀꢁ ꢂꢁ ꢂꢁ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ ꢅꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢇꢇꢋꢌꢍꢍꢎꢊꢇꢇ ꢐꢑꢒ ꢓꢔꢕꢔꢄꢋ ꢖꢋꢗꢘꢙ ꢏꢋ
ꢒꢗꢘꢙꢚꢛꢚꢒꢜꢙꢚꢝꢞ8
2] DJRBXM _M iRJ BD_mJꢎ]B[JH 9 '_]ieBFi_e ꢀꢁ7kDF_]ieBFi_eꢍ w . BFV]_oXJHPJ iRBi . RBmJ B F_]iT]kT]P _DYTPBiT_] i_ kaHBiJ iRTg HTgFX_gkeJ M_e[ TM . gkDgiTikiJꢏ _e TM . gJXJFi BHHTiT_]BXꢏ BeFRTiJFigꢐ HJgTP] ae_MJggT_]BXgꢐ F_]ieBFi_egꢐ _e gkDF_]ieBFi_eg oTiRT] iJ]ꢑꢒ ꢓꢔHBrg _M iRJ gJXJFiT_] _e FRB]PJꢕ B]H w . RJeJDr FJeiTMr iRBiꢖ
. RBmJ THJ]iTMTJH BXX aJeg_]g M_e oRTFR iRJ 2eHT]B]FJ eJckTeJg HTgFX_gkeJ 8RJ T]M_e[BiT_] T] iRTg HTgFX_gkeJ M_e[ꢑB]H B]r BiiBFR[J]i i_ iRTg M_e[ꢔTg iekJꢐ BFFkeBiJꢐ F_eeJFiꢐ B]H F_[aXJiJ B]H . RBmJ DJJ] XJPBXXr BkiR_eTvJH i_ gkD[Ti iRTg HTgFX_gkeJ M_e[ꢗ ꢀꢁ
x
x
KXkHT]P BiiBFR[J]igꢔ Tg:;ꢘꢀꢙ aBPJgꢗ
23 4eT]i ,kXX 0B[Jꢍ:<8 yTz[{_|
====
4R_]J 0k[DJeꢛ ?ꢜ>iRJBXt"beT[ꢗF_[
ꢁ ꢂ ========>ꢝ>
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ ꢅꢅꢆꢇꢆꢅꢈꢄ
332 of 895
333 of 895
ꢀꢁꢂ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢁꢂꢅꢆ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ ꢅꢆꢃꢇHꢃꢈHꢅꢉꢁHꢊꢃꢋꢀꢌHꢃꢈHꢌꢆꢀꢁꢍꢅꢃꢀꢂHꢃꢈH
ꢎꢀꢆꢏꢃꢀꢆꢂHꢂꢁꢀ!ꢆꢍꢁꢂHꢍꢃꢀꢎꢃꢀꢋꢅꢆꢃꢇH
ꢌꢋꢅꢁꢌ ꢋB3B@AHꢐꢑꢒ ꢓꢑꢓꢐ
ꢅ4(HB;'(?@63;('ꢒHA4(H'B8FH(8(&A('H$;'H$&A6;3Hꢂ(&?(A$?FH=)Hꢎ?69=?6@Hꢂ(?C6&(@Hꢍ=?>=?$A6=;H ꢔA4(Hꢕꢍ=9>$;FꢖꢗꢒH'=(@H5(?(%FH&(?A62HA4$AHA4(H088=D6;3H6@H$H188ꢒHA?B(H$;'H&=??(&AH&=>FH=)H$H ?(@=8BA6=;H'B8FH$'=>A('H%FHA4(Hꢊ=$?'H=)Hꢌ6?(&A=?@H=)HA4(Hꢍ=9>$;FH=;HꢋB3B@AHꢐꢑꢒHꢓꢑꢓꢐꢘH@$6'H ?(@=8BA6=;H4$@H;=AH%((;H9='6.('H=?H?(@&6;'('H@6;&(H6A@H$'=>A6=;H$;'H6@H6;H188H0?&(H$@H=)HA4(H'$A(H 4(?(=*ꢘ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ!ꢁꢌꢒHA4$AHꢍ4$?8(@Hꢊ(@@(89$;H%(H$;'H4(?(%FH6@ꢒH(8(&A('HA=HA4(H=+/&(H=)H!6&(H ꢎ?(@6'(;Aꢙ ꢀ($8Hꢁ@A$A(ꢒH(,(&A6C(HꢋB3B@AHꢐꢑꢒ ꢓꢑꢓꢐꢘ
ꢊꢁHꢆꢅHꢈ ꢀꢅꢉꢁꢀHꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ!ꢁꢌHA4$AHA4(H088=D6;3H6;'6C6'B$8@H$?(HA4(H$>>?=C('H@8$A(H=)H =+/&(?@H=)Hꢎ?69=?6@Hꢂ(?C6&(@Hꢍ=?>=?$A6=;ꢒH$;'H($&4H6@H$BA4=?6G('H$;'H4$@HA4(H>=D(?HA=H%6;'HA4(H ꢍ=9>$;FH%FH(;A(?6;3H6;H$;FH&=;A?$&AH=?H%FH(E(&BA6;3H$;FH6;@A?B9(;AH6;HA4(H;$9(H=)H$;'H=;H %(4$8)H=)HA4(Hꢍ=9>$;FꢒH$;'H@B&4H$BA4=?6AFH6@H3(;(?$8H$;'H;=AH&=;.;('HA=H@>(&6.&H6;@A$;&(@ꢒH$;'H @4$88H&=;A6;B(HB;A68H9='6.('H%FH?(@=8BA6=;ꢘH
ꢅ=9Hꢏ&ꢍ=?96&7H
ꢚ(;Hꢌ='3(;H
ꢎ?(@6'(;AH$;'Hꢍ46()HꢁE(&BA6C(Hꢃ+/&(?H
ꢍ46()Hꢈ6;$;&6$8Hꢃ-&(?ꢙHꢁE(&BA6C(H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AH
ꢍ46()Hꢄ(3$8Hꢃ+/&(?ꢙ ꢁE(&BA6C(H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AHꢙꢂ(&?(A$?FH ꢎ?(@6'(;Aꢙ ꢁ;(?3Fꢒ ꢀ(;(D$%8(@Hꢂ(39(;AH
ꢎ?(@6'(;Aꢙ ꢁ;(?3Fꢒ ꢀ(;(D$%8(@Hꢂ(39(;AH
ꢎ?(@6'(;AHꢙ ꢁ;(?3Fꢒ ꢀ(;(D$%8(@Hꢂ(39(;AH
ꢎ?(@6'(;AHꢙ ꢎ6>(@ꢒ ꢎ=D(?Hꢞ ꢆ;'B@A?6$8H
ꢛ=4;Hꢏꢜ ꢎ(?6@6&4H
ꢀF$;Hꢎ$8$GG=H
ꢛ(?(9FHꢚ6;&4H
ꢂA(>5(;Hꢛ=;(@H
ꢅ69=A4FHꢉ($8FH
ꢍ=8A(?Hꢏ=('8H
ꢂ&=AHꢚ$A4:$;;H
ꢂ($;Hꢝ=?'=;H
ꢎ?(@6'(;AHꢙH A686A6(@Hꢂ(39(;AH
ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙHꢂ$8(@HꢞHꢏ$?7(A6;3H
ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AHꢙ ꢋ'96;6@A?$A6=;H
ꢅ?$C6@HꢂA?6&7(?H ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;Aꢙ Hꢈ6;$;&(H
ꢍ4$'Hꢉ$EA=;H ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙHꢆ;0?9$A6=;Hꢅ(&4<=8=3FH ꢌ(;;6@Hꢏ$&ꢋ8((@(H ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙH"(@AHꢀ(36=;Hꢔ A686A6(@ꢗH ꢀ4=;'$Hꢋ;'(?@=;H ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙHꢉB9$;Hꢀ(@=B?&(@H ꢌ=B3Hꢀ((C(@H
ꢏ$?7H#$;67H
ꢀ(36=;$8Hꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙHꢏ6'D(@AHꢀ(36=;Hꢔ A686A6(@ꢗH ꢂ(;6=?H!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙHꢏꢞꢋH
!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AꢙHꢆ;C(@A=?Hꢀ(8$A6=;@H
!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AH
ꢊ8$7(Hꢉ=8&=9%H
ꢅ('Hꢏ$?AGH
ꢅ4=9$@Hꢅ(7B8C(H
ꢝ$?FHꢊ?=D;H
ꢌ$C6'H!$;Hꢌ$9H
ꢛ=(FHꢄ6AA8(A=;H
!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AH
!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AH
!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AH
!6&(Hꢎ?(@6'(;AH
334 of 895
335 of 895
City of Glendale Exhibit No. 2
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Chairperson
All members of the Board of Directors
All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractor(s)*:
Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* Contractor is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, , or HA or any member of that persons, entitys, or organizations Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons name and business address. 336 of 895
337 of 895
DocuSign Envelope ID: 26399048-B5F3-4FCC-91FE-50D6FE43D5CB City of Glendale Exhibit No. 3
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and subsequently amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 and Ordinance No. 5885, which became effective on November 3, 2016 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), the Successor Agency (“SA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, SA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, SA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, SA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.
The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, SA’s, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, SA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
To assist members of the City Council, SA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.
A contractor must provide the information listed below when:
• The City Contract is subject to City Council approval; or A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
• The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts totaling $50,000 or more is subject • A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, to Council approval. have an aggregate value of $25,000 or more.
Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractor(s)*:
Name Address
SILVERADO CONTRACTORS, INC. 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94608 Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Joseph M. Capriola Chief Executive Officer / President 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor Oakland CA 94608 Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Alex Do 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor Oakland
Oakland
Oakland
CA
CA
CA
94608
94608
94608
Joseph M. Capriola / Peter W. Knuth
Joseph M. Capriola / Peter W. Knuth
2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor
More than 10% interest owner 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor * “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, SA, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 338 of 895
DocuSign Envelope ID: 26399048-B5F3-4FCC-91FE-50D6FE43D5CB Subcontractor(s)**:
Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
None Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:
Title Business Address City State Zip
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
.
.
.
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 2 In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.
Oakland 11/7/2023 | 4:29 PM PST
Executed on:
Signature:
, 20 , at: , California.
Joseph M. Capriola Print Full Name:
2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94608 Address:
Phone Number: 510-658-9960 E-mail Address: [email protected] Rev. 11/8/17
339 of 895
340 of 895
DocuSign Envelope ID: 26399048-B5F3-4FCC-91FE-50D6FE43D5CB Subcontractor(s)**:
Name Address
CHAMPION CONTRACTORS 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94608 Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Joseph M. Capriola Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor Oakland CA 94608
Alex Do 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor Oakland
Oakland
Oakland
CA
CA
CA
94608
94608
94608
Joseph M. Capriola / Peter W. Knuth
Joseph M. Capriola / Peter W. Knuth
2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor
More than 10% interest owner 2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor ** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
None Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:
Title Business Address City State Zip
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
.
.
.
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 1 In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.
Oakland 11/7/2023 | 4:29 PM PST
Executed on:
Signature:
, 20 , at: , California.
Joseph M. Capriola Print Full Name:
2855 Mandela Parkway, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94608 Address:
Phone Number: 510-658-9960 E-mail Address: [email protected] Rev. 11/8/17
341 of 895
342 of 895
Subcontractor(s)**:
Full Name
Name Address
ZEFIRO CORPORATION 3868 Carson Street, #325, Torrance, CA 90503 Title
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Business Address City State
CA
Zip
Takayuki Sakai 3868 Carson Street, #325
3868 Carson Street, #325
Torrance
Torrance
Torrance
Torrance
Torrance
Torrance
90503
Takayuki Sakai
Takayuki Sakai
Takayuki Sakai
CA 90503
90503
90503
90503
90503
3868 Carson Street, #325
3868 Carson Street, #325
3868 Carson Street, #325
3868 Carson Street, #325
CA
CA
Takayuki Sakai / Mladen Buntich / Brandon Sjulin Board of Directors Takayuki Sakais / Mladen Buntich / Brandon Sjulin More than 10% interest owner CA
CA
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Takayuki Sakai Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:
Title Business Address City State Zip
President 3868 Carson Street, #325 Torrance CA 90503
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
.
.
.
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 1 In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.
November 6th 23 Torrance Executed on:
Signature:
, 20 , at: , California.
Takayuki SAKAI Print Full Name:
3868 Carson Street #325, Torrance, CA 90503
909-758-7068
Address:
[email protected] Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Rev. 11/8/17
343 of 895
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: City Owned Solar Development Program – Phase 1 Award of Contracts
1. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Solar Optimum, Inc., using the Alternative Project Delivery Method for the Engineer-Procure-Construct (EPC) of Solar PV Systems for a not-to-exceed amount of $9,953,000 with a 15% contingency of $1,492,950 at the following project sites: 1) Sports Complex, 2) Glendale Community College Lot 34, 3) Utility Operations Center, 4) Central Library, and 5) GWP Perkins Building.
2. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc., using the Alternative Project Delivery Method for the EPC of Solar PV Systems for a not to exceed amount of $151,274 with a 15% contingency of $22,691 for project design and engineering, and environmental analysis under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at the following project site: 1) Brand Landfill.
3. Resolution amending Resolution 23-24, authorizing the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power Department, or his designee, to utilize the Engineer, Procure, Construct (EPC) Project Delivery Method for the Solar Photovoltaic System at Six Proposed Sites.
COUNCIL ACTION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 7, 2023, City Council authorized the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power (GWP) to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Alternative Project Delivery Method of Delivery for the Engineer-Procure-Construct of solar PV systems for the eight sites included in Phase 1 of the City Owned Solar Development Program.
These eight sites were estimated to deliver 4.4 MW of solar PV energy at an estimated cost of $14,650,000. However, two sites were removed from the RFP due to certain constraints and were replaced with one new site. These seven sites were estimated to deliver 3.9 MW of solar PV energy at a cost of $12,850,000. Later, Fire Station 21 from the RFP as requested by the department. This adjustment resulted in the RFP including 8e
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for November 14, 2023 calendar
344 of 895
2 8e
six sites for an estimated 3.7 MW of solar PV energy at an estimated cost of $12,050,000.
The RFP submittal period closed on August 11, 2023. Based on the results of a competitive selection process, staff has prepared its recommendation herein this report.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to execute two separate Engineer-Procure-Construct (EPC) Contracts as follows:
With Solar Optimum, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $9,953,000 with a 15% contingency of 1,492,950 for a total of $11,445,950 for the following sites:
• Sports Complex Parking Lot
• Community College Lot 34
• Utility Operations Center Parking Lot
• Central Library
• GWP Perkins Building
With Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc., in the not-to-exceed amount of $151,274 with a 15% contingency of $22,691 for a total of $173,965 for project design and engineering, and environmental analysis under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Brand Landfill site.
Authorize Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc. to conduct the engineering and CEQA review of the Brand Landfill PV Project (Brand Landfill Project), and once completed to return to Council for appropriate action pertaining to the required CEQA analysis and at that time to authorize a contract for the construction phase of the project.
ANALYSIS
On August 16, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-125 which, among other things, declared the City of Glendale’s intent to adopt policies and practices designed to ensure future investments in equipment and infrastructure to produce electricity to serve the needs of the City and utility customers will to the maximum extent possible be clean, renewable, or non-carbon emitting, and to achieve 100% clean, renewable, or noncarbon emitting energy no later than 2035. In support of said goals, City Council directed staff to issue an RFP to solicit proposals for Phase 1 of the City Owned Solar Development Program
On March 7, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-24 authorizing the General Manager of GWP to issue an RFP for Phase 1 of the City Owned Solar Development Program. The original eight sites were estimated to deliver 4.4 MW of solar PV energy at a cost of $14,650,000.
Prior to advertising the RFP, staff identified constraints with Montrose Lot 3 and 345 of 895
3 8e
Dunsmore Park sites that required removal from the RFP and to be considered for future phases of solar PV development. However, Glendale Community College Lot 34 site was added as a replacement and the RFP was subsequently issued on May 22, 2023, for seven sites. These seven sites were estimated to deliver 3.9 MW of solar PV energy at a cost of $12,850,000.
Three addenda were issued during the RFP submittal period. Addendum No. 1 removed Fire Station 21 from the RFP as requested by the department. This adjustment resulted in the RFP including six sites for an estimated 3.7 MW of solar PV energy at an estimated cost of $12,050,000.
Addendum No. 2 provided answers to questions submitted by interested proposers, disclosed a list of interested proposers to encourage vendor collaboration, established a schedule for site walks, and extended the proposal submittal deadline from July 28, 2023, to August 11, 2023. The proposal deadline was extended at the request of interested proposers to allow for additional time for proposal submittals.
Addendum No. 3 included language in the General Conditions outlining the addition of a roof warranty and coordination with the Glendale Central Library roofing contractor to ensure the roof warranty is preserved during and after all phases of the solar array construction activities are completed.
Proposers could submit proposals for one, multiple, or all sites included in the RFP. This criterion was intended to attract vendors with varying expertise and to maximize proposal submissions.
Proposal Evaluation and Selection
GWP received proposals from the following five firms:
• California Solar Group (proposed for two sites)
• Enerlogics West, LLC
• HOLT Renewables, LLC
• Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc.
• Solar Optimum, Inc.
GWP staff conducted proposal evaluations based on the following criteria:
Weight Evaluation Criteria
40% Price and fees.
25%
Description of project approach and schedule. Demonstrated understanding of the project’s nature including the necessary environmental and permitting analysis as required for each project.
Detailed plans on how to deliver the project timely and efficiently. 346 of 895
4 8e
25% Demonstrated EPC Contractor experience on similar solar photovoltaic projects.
10% Completeness and quality of the response.
The evaluation methodology for pricing focused on each vendor’s total cost per watt for each of the six sites. This approach allowed evaluators to equally compare pricing for each site individually despite the range of proposed solar PV system sizes. Below is an example of two pricing proposals for the Brand Landfill site where the total amount for one is higher than the other, yet the proposal with the higher overall cost has a lower cost per watt due to its larger solar PV system size compared to the other proposal.
Brand Landfill Proposal Example:
Proposal Amount PV System Size (kW) Cost per Watt
$3,439,189 1,273 $2.70
$3,942,071 1,811 $2.18
A range of proposed system sizes for each individual site was expected due to the RFP explicitly encouraging proposers to identify and propose refinements to the conceptual designs including the prioritization of maximizing solar PV output. This aspect of the evaluations was a key deciding factor that shaped staff’s recommendation for contract award as one of the top priorities of the project is to maximize the City’s solar PV output.
The evaluation of each proposer’s project approach identified proposals that included PV system sizes that exceeded were equal to or less than the estimated sizes included in each conceptual design. Interestingly, the two proposals that included PV system sizes exceeding the City’s estimates also had the lowest cost per watt. The three additional proposals included two proposals with PV system sizes less than the City’s estimates and one proposal that exactly matched the City’s estimates. These factors among others demonstrated each proposer’s understanding of the City’s desire to maximize solar PV output on its facilities.
The evaluation of each proposer’s experience revealed an impressive collection of projects similar in scope to the sites included in the RFP including projects in Southern California and California in general. The largest differentiating factor in project experience between the proposers was whether the experience was in-house or subcontracted. The proposers with in-house experience demonstrated an attractive balance of value engineering to reduce costs and maximize system efficiency. The proposers relying heavily on subcontractors also provided impressive project references. However, the overall project approach, understanding of the City’s priorities, and project costs aligned more with the proposers with a greater concentration of an in-house workforce.
347 of 895
5 8e
Description of the proposed Solar Project to be located at five sites:
• Sports Complex Parking Lot
o This site is located at 2200 Fern Lane and covers an area of approximately 2.4 acres. The proposed carport solar array would cover approximately 1.4 acres of the total parking lot area allowing for open air travel aisles.
• Community College Lot 34
o This site is located at 1648 Cañada Blvd. and covers an area of approximately 1.8 acres. The proposed carport solar array would cover approximately 0.8 acres and would include one large span carport solar array section at the northeastern section of the parking lot and five additional sections covering just the parking spaces allowing for open air travel aisles.
• Utility Operations Center Parking Lot
o This site is located at the Grayson Power Plant, 901 Fairmont Ave. The parking lot covers an area of approximately 1.2 acres and the proposed carport solar array would cover approximately 0.4 acres allowing for open air travel aisles.
• Central Library
o This site is located at 222 E Harvard Street, and the proposed installation is a rooftop solar array. The rooftop footprint covers an area of approximately 1 acre and the proposed solar array would cover most of the available rooftop space while providing adequate access to the existing HVAC equipment, electrical conduit, and drains. • GWP Perkins Building
o This site is located at 141 N Glendale Ave., and the proposed installation is a rooftop solar array. The rooftop footprint covers an area of approximately 0.75 acre and the proposed solar array would cover approximately half of the total area due to the large open atrium and existing HVAC equipment, electrical conduit, and drains.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
GWP will conduct outreach as each of the projects are designed and ready to be built.
FISCAL IMPACT
The construction of the City Owned Solar Development Program – Phase 1 Projects (five project sites) will cost $9,953,000 plus a 15% contingency of $1,492,950 for a total of $11,445,950, and Brand Landfill project will cost $151,274 plus a 15% contingency of $22,691 for a total of $173,965.
The total amount for the construction of five sites and the design, engineering, and environmental review for one site, including the 15% contingency is $11,619,915, which is available in the current FY 23-24 budget.
348 of 895
6 8e
Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$11,619,915 GL: 43110-5830-GWP-0020-P0000-
PL: GWP00660AA
Electric Depreciation
Fund
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Project to be undertaken by Solar Optimum, Inc.:
The Project would involve installation of solar PV systems at three existing City-owned parking lots and on two rooftops of existing City-owned buildings. The Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301: Class 1 Existing Facilities because the Project would involve negligible or no expansion of use. The solar arrays would be located in an area that is already physically built out with parking lots and a building roof top where no environmentally sensitive habitats exist. The project is categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines 15303 - Class 3 New construction or conversion of small structures.
This project involves the construction of accessory structures such as solar carports on existing parking lots and an existing roof top with associated equipment infrastructure, and minor excavation for carport footings and power lines.
The Project is categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15311 – Class 11 Accessory Structures. Class 11 consists of construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, which is applicable to this project because this project includes placement of PV systems on an existing roof top and on existing parking lots. CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 includes several exceptions to categorical exemptions, which include the following: location; cumulative impact; significant effect; scenic highways; hazardous waste sites; and historical resources. These exceptions have been determined not to apply to the Project because none of these project sites are located in or near a sensitive ecological area, a hazardous waste, historic resources; the project does involve unusual circumstances, does not create a cumulatively significant effect, and does not impact scenic highways.
Project to be undertaken by Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc.
The Project would involve the design and installation of PV System at the Brand Landfill. Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc. will first undertake the design and CEQA analysis of the proposed Project. Once that is completed, the appropriate CEQA documentation and Project will be presented to the City Council and authorization will be obtained at that time to commence with the construction phase of the Project. 349 of 895
7 8e
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744, the Campaign Disclosures including the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, subcontractors, and any person or entity with more than ten percent interest in the company are attached as follows:
Exhibit 2: Solar Optimum, Inc.
Exhibit 3: Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc.
Exhibit 4: HOLT Renewables, LLC
Exhibit 5: Enerlogics West, LLC
Exhibit 6: California Solar Group
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the two Motions to proceed with the award of contracts for the EPC Alternative Project Delivery Method for the City Owned Solar Development Program – Phase 1 as stated in this report, as well as the Resolution amending Resolution 23-24.
Alternative 2: Not approve the two Motions to proceed with the award of contracts for the EPC Alternative Project Delivery Method for the City Owned Solar Development Program – Phase 1 and approve any other alternatives identified in this report.
Alternative 3: Consider any other alternatives not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:
Daniel Scorza, P.E., Chief Assistant General Manager – Electric Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Resolution No. 23-24
Exhibit 2: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Solar Optimum, Inc.
Exhibit 3: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc.
Exhibit 4: Campaign Finance Disclosure for HOLT Renewables, LLC Exhibit 5: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Enerlogics West, LLC Exhibit 6: Campaign Finance Disclosure for California Solar Group 350 of 895
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale finds that that the Council of the City of Glendale, having previously by Resolution No. 23-24, authorized the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power Department (GWP) to issue a Request For Proposal (RFP) using the Engineer, Procure, Construct (EPC) project delivery method for the design, engineering and construction of the Solar Photovoltaic System at Eight Proposed Sites, hereby accepts and approves the proposal of Solar Optimum, Inc. for the design, engineering and construction of Solar Photovoltaic System at the following sites: 1) Sports Complex, 2) Glendale Community College Lot 34, 3) Utility Operations Center, 4) Central Library, and 5) GWP Perkins Building, as recommended by the Report dated November 28, 2023 by the General Manager of GWP. The City Manager, or his designee, subject to approval by the City Attorney, is authorized to enter into an EPC contract with Solar Optimum, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $9,953,000, plus a fifteen percent (15%) contingency in the amount of $1,492,950, after the effective date of the ordinance adopting a new electric rate plan as proposed by the Report to Council and Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) considered on November 14, 2023, and a determination by the City Manager that the rate plan and bond financing issued for the project will be sufficient to pay for said EPC contract.
351 of 895
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
352 of 895
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale finds that that the Council of the City of Glendale, having previously by Resolution No. 23-24, authorized the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power Department (GWP) to issue a Request For Proposal (RFP) using the Engineer, Procure, Construct (EPC) project delivery method for the design, engineering and construction of the Solar Photovoltaic System at Eight Proposed Sites, hereby accepts and approves the proposal of Motive Energy Storage Systems, Inc. for the design, engineering and construction of Solar Photovoltaic System at Brand Landfill site as recommended by the Report dated November 14, 2023 by the General Manager of GWP. The City Council at this time authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, subject to approval by the City Attorney, to enter into a contract with Solar Optimum, Inc., subject to the approval of the City Attorney, in the not-to-exceed amount of $151,274, plus a 15% contingency of $22,691, for project design, engineering and environmental analysis under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of the proposed project at the Brand Landfill site. City Manager shall enter into the hereindescribed contract with Solar Optimum, Inc. after the effective date of the ordinance adopting a new electric rate plan as proposed by the Report to Council and Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) considered on November 14, 2023, and a determination by the City Manager that the rate plan and bond financing issued for the project will be sufficient to pay for said contract. City Council further directs staff, that once the design, engineering and environmental analysis portions of the proposed project at the Brand 353 of 895
Landfill site are completed, to return to the City Council for further required approvals and authorization for the construction of the proposed project.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
354 of 895
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 23-24, AUTHORIZING THE
GENERAL MANAGER OF GLENDALE WATER & POWER DEPARTMENT,
OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO UTILIZE THE ENGINEER, PROCURE, CONSTRUCT (EPC) PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD FOR THE SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC
SYSTEM AT SIX PROPOSED SITES
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, the Glendale City Council adopted Resolution 23-24 authorizing the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power Department (“GWP”) to utilize the Engineer, Procure, Construct (EPC) Project Delivery Method for the Solar Photovoltaic System at eight proposed sites pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code (“GMC”) Chapter 4.13. Said Resolution also authorized the City Clerk to advertise for Proposals; and WHEREAS, the eight proposed sites consisted of the following: 1) Glendale Sports Complex Parking Lot, 2) Montrose Parking Lot 3, 3) Utility Operations Parking Lot, 4) Brand Landfill, 5) Fire Station 21, 6) Glendale Central Library, 7) GWP Perkins Building and 8) Dunsmore Park Parking Lot; and WHEREAS, as a part of the Request For Proposals (RFP) process, GWP staff in collaboration with other City department staff further assessed the suitability of the eight proposed sites and concluded that three of the proposed sites – Montrose Parking Lot 3, Fire Station 21, and Dunsmore Park Parking Lot – were not suitable for the installation of solar photovoltaic systems; and WHEREAS, during its various site assessment described above, GWP staff discovered that GCC Lot 34 is a suitable site for the installation of a solar photovoltaic system; and
WHEREAS, similar to the proposed solar photovoltaic systems proposed at the Glendale Sports Complex Parking Lot, Utility Operations Parking Lot, Brand Landfill, Glendale Central Library, GWP Perkins Building, the utilization of an alternative project delivery method for the proposed solar photovoltaic system at GCC Lot 34, will meet and satisfy GWP’s needs, similar to the other five solar photovoltaic system sites, by resulting in overall schedule acceleration [GMC Section 4.13.060(A)(7], and avoiding delays by having the contractor and engineer involved and collaborating from the beginning and throughout, thus reducing the completion time for the proposed GCC Lot 34 solar photovoltaic system [GMC Section 4.13.060(A)(4)]; and
WHEREAS, the utilization of the EPC method for GCC Lot 34 will also minimize the overall cost for the proposed solar photovoltaic system project by 355 of 895
2 allowing the designer and builder team to have early coordination of the construction means, methods and materials and enabling constant communication and coordination between the team members to have fewer design errors, construction mistakes and change orders. [GMC Section
4.13.060(B)(2)(i) and (ii).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Glendale, California that:
Section 1. The recitals above are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of the findings in support of this Resolution and are basis for authorizing the use of the EPC delivery method for on each of the following proposed solar photovoltaic system sites: 1) Glendale Sports Complex Parking Lot, 2) Utility Operations Parking Lot, 3) Brand Landfill, 4) Glendale Central Library, 5) GWP Perkins Building, and 5) GCC Lot 34,
Section 2. City Council Resolution No. 23-24 is amended to remove the following sites: Montrose Parking Lot 3, Fire Station 21, and Dunsmore Park Parking Lot, and to add the following site: GCC Lot 34 as proposed sites for the installation of solar photovoltaic systems.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2023.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk
356 of 895
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _______________ was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ______ day of ______________________, 2023, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________
City Clerk
357 of 895
EXHIBIT 1
358 of 895
359 of 895
360 of 895
City of Glendale, Calfomia
EXHIBITG
CAMPGAIN FINANCE ORDINANCE DISCLOSURE FORM
City of Glendale
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, 'Campaign Finance Ordinance," which became effective on September 9, 2011, and subsequently amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 and Ordinance No. 5885, which became effective on November 3, 2016 ("the Ordinance"). The Ordinance pt0hibits: (1) A contractor" (induding a subcontractor**)- who has a contract with the City of Glendale ('City"), the Successor Agency ("SA"), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale ('HA1 and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, SA, or HA- from making a contribution to a City Council member, SA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, SA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.
The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council's, SA's, or HA's approval. A contract with the City, SA, or HA is known as a "City Contract." The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
To assist members of the City Council, SA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.
A contractor must orovide the information listed below when: l ., .t' :, A subcontractor must orovide the information listed below when:
• The City Contract is subject to City Council approval; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts totaling $50,000 or more is subject to • A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, have an Council aooroval. aqqreqate value of $25,000 or more.
Information that must be disclosed: • Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) • Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
• Chief Operating Officer
• Chief Financial Officer
• Chairperson
• All members of the Board of Directors
• All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization • Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractw; · I sDlf 4£ .. ,,.. r;,,"''"" tf5/ V:Ac'ff !JIJ. I
EXHIBIT 2
361 of 895
City of Glendale, California
Title Business Address
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief O eratin Officer
Chief Financial Officer /( Ir /(
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
• "Contractor· is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, SA, or HA or any member of that person's, entity's, or organization's Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons' name and business address.
s ubcontractor(s)**:
Name -·· ', f - ,. - ,. '.1~= j Address
-,gn
Full Name Title ,..,..... -- .... ,:...; ,.., ~Business Address " ',;,;'':!; • -. : City State Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** "Subcontractor" is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor, Subcontractor includes any member of that person's, entity's, or organization's Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons' name and business address.
Campaign Committee owned or controlled by: __________________ _ I Trtle I Business Address I State I Zip
/r
J
Zip i
362 of 895
r City of Glendale, California
On behalf of the above-named L 1rac1o, D Suboontractor:
CERTIFICATION
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute- or if I select additional- architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.
In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is _3_ pages.
Execured on: 1:5~;:()_~
S1gnature:_.._~_,._,-;;.. _E __ ==-------------------
, 20.i.l_, at: ___ ..... n ....P...,\a,...i:J.....,_ ___________ _,, California.
Address &5/ Uy 8/vJ. , a,J,,k_ , CJ 1/liJI
Phone Number. f?/{?:. 3 [li -3 '/'tf.2 E-mail Address: a@ krJ/sw-, //<VI.~ ~a., ~U"1. u,,-,
364 of 895
365 of 895
366 of 895
City of Glendale, California
Page | 144
EXHIBIT G
CAMPGAIN FINANCE ORDINANCE DISCLOSURE FORM
City of Glendale
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and subsequently amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 and Ordinance No. 5885, which became effective on November 3, 2016 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), the Successor Agency (“SA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, SA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, SA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, SA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.
The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, SA’s, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, SA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
To assist members of the City Council, SA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.
A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
• The City Contract is subject to City Council approval; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts totaling $50,000 or more is subject to Council approval.
• A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or more.
Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractor(s)*:
Name Address
HOLT Renewables, LLC 1301 S Capital of Texas Highway, Suite B-315, Austin, TX 78746 367 of 895
City of Glendale, California
Page | 145
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, SA, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Subcontractor(s)**:
Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:
Title Business Address City State Zip
PC Ventures, LLC 5665 SE Loop 410 San Antonio TX 78222 None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paul Hensley 5665 SE Loop 410 San Antonio TX 78222 368 of 895
City of Glendale, California
Page | 146
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
▪ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ▪ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ▪ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.
In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.
Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.
Signature: Print Full Name:
Address:
Phone Number: E-mail Address:
X
3 23 1301 S. Capital of Texas Highway, B-315, Austin Texas August 9th Victoria King 1301 S. Capital of Texas Highway, B-315, Austin, Texas 78746 512-382-2999 [email protected] 369 of 895
Glendale Water and Power – City Owned Solar Dev Program - RFP No. 3953 Proprietary and Confidential Page 57
9.1.7 Campaign Disclosure
370 of 895
Glendale Water and Power – City Owned Solar Dev Program - RFP No. 3953 Proprietary and Confidential Page 58
371 of 895
Glendale Water and Power – City Owned Solar Dev Program - RFP No. 3953 Proprietary and Confidential Page 59
372 of 895
373 of 895
374 of 895
375 of 895
9a
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: 601 North Brand Boulevard – Stage I Preliminary Design Review (Case No. PDR 000628-2022)
1. Motion to Approve Stage I Preliminary Design Review
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for November 14, 2023 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed project site is the eastern approximately three-quarters of the block created by Sanchez Drive to the north, North Brand Boulevard to the east, West Doran Street to the south and North Central Avenue to the west and is approximately 5.4 acres. The proposal consists of the demolition of an existing 144-space surface parking lot (approximately 78,000 sf) located in the northern portion of the site and the construction of a new 858-unit, 858,000 SF (total development 7.5 FAR) multi-family development. The multi-family dwelling units will be contained in two 380-ft. high towers over a podium level. The 942 parking spaces will be located at-grade as well as within four levels of below grade parking. Most of the proposed publicly accessible open space is located within a newly created plaza/courtyard formed by the proposed project and an existing on-site office building (to be maintained), fronting Brand Boulevard.
Additional publicly accessible open space is proposed adjacent to the Sanchez Drive right-of-way. The project site is in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Gateway District.
Aside from the surface parking lot, existing development will be maintained on the project site. This site features a 14-story office tower (611 N. Brand) fronting Brand Boulevard, a one-story retail building (601 N. Brand) located at the intersection of Brand Boulevard and Doran Street and a five-story parking garage located in the western portion of the site fronting Doran Street.
The project includes:
• 594 1-bedroom units and 264 2-bedroom units. Each residential tower will contain 429 units.
• 942 parking spaces (net spaces 798) are provided at-grade and at four levels of subterranean parking.
• The podium level at the street will contain a restaurant at the Brand/Sanchez 376 of 895
2 a 9
intersection opening onto the proposed plaza, two lobbies, a leasing office, two loading docks, back-of-house uses and bicycle storage. A proposed portecochere bisects this level. • The second level of the podium will contain co-working spaces, an amenity space, two lounges, and a fitness center. The outdoor area at this level includes a swimming pool, spa, two dog parks, an outdoor kitchen with dining, a bar, seating/lounging areas and an event lawn.
• The third through 35th levels of the towers are entirely made up of residential units. A green bridge planting area connects the two residential towers. • The 36th level of both towers contain indoor amenity spaces and outdoor covered and uncovered terraces for residents of the project.
• Proposed publicly accessible open space includes a newly created plaza fronting Brand Boulevard as well as areas adjacent to the Sanchez Drive right-of-way.
Existing publicly accessible open space includes areas adjacent to and between the existing development on the site.
A Floor Area Ration (FAR) of 7.25 and building height of 275 feet are the maximums permitted by right in the DSP Gateway District. An FAR of 7.5 and building height of 380 feet are the maximums per the DSP Community Benefits Chapter 7 for affordable housing projects. The project must comply with the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance, which requires a minimum of 15% affordable housing; for the subject project, that equates to 129 units of low or very low-income housing. Because the project is providing affordable housing units, it is eligible for a density bonus per GMC 30.36 and community benefit development incentives, per DSP 7.2.1. These will be addressed at Stage II. The applicant will be requesting the following incentives and waivers:
• DSP 4.2.C – Building footplates above 200 feet high shall be reduced in area by 15%.
• DSP 4.2.M – High rise facades above 60 feet must be stepped back a minimum of 20 feet.
• DSP 4.2.4.A – Building facades over 200 feet in length must include building separation at the street level or at 16 feet above street level. • DSP 4.2.4.B – Building separation must be at least 40 feet wide. • DSP 4.2.14 – No more than 40% of balconies shall extend beyond the building façade and project a maximum of 25% of balconies full depth.
These incentives and waivers will be discussed and analyzed during Stage II review.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the Stage I Preliminary Design for the proposed development located at 601 North Brand Boulevard, subject to staff’s recommendations. 377 of 895
3 a 9
BACKGROUND AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The 5.4-acre (235,224 SF) project site is in the eastern three-quarters of the block created by Sanchez Drive to the north, Brand Boulevard to the east, Doran Street to the south and Central Avenue to the west. The proposed project will be in the northern portion of the project site on an existing approximately 78,000 SF surface parking lot, which will be demolished. All other current development on the project site will be maintained. This development includes an office tower (611 N. Brand) fronting Brand Boulevard, a retail building (601 N. Brand) located at the Brand/Doran intersection and a parking structure fronting Doran Street, all developed in 1972.
Zoning and Surrounding Uses
The Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) designates the project site as well as the block east and west of Brand Boulevard from Glenoaks Boulevard to the north and Lexington Boulevard to the south as the Gateway District. Located at the northern portion of the Downtown Specific Plan area, the Gateway district features the most visibly noted skyline of Downtown Glendale, characterized by high-rise development featuring numerous corporate headquarters. The focus of the Gateway District is the continued promotion and location of corporate headquarters, mixed-use and residential buildings, complementary/accessory service, and retail businesses at the street level, as well as the introduction of appropriate night-time entertainment uses.
ANALYSIS
Proposed Project
The proposed project is in the northern one-third of the subject site at the location of an existing 144-space surface parking lot. The project will feature a new 858-unit, 36- story, 380-foot-tall multi-family development contained in two residential towers. The ground floor podium level will include a restaurant/retail tenant space and associated Zoning Existing Uses
North DSP – Gateway District 134 Freeway and 8-story office buildings.
South DSP – Gateway and
Orange Central Districts
High-rise, mixed-use building, parking structure,
drive-thru ATM, and multi-family residential building
(Altana).
East DSP – Gateway District High-rise office buildings.
West DSP – Gateway District 6-story multi-family building (Modera).
Project
Site
DSP – Gateway District 14-story office tower, a one-story retail building, a five-story parking garage and a surface parking lot
(to be demolished for the currently proposed
project.
378 of 895
4 a 9
facilities for the residents of the project (lobbies, leasing office, back-of-house). The second-floor podium level will include co-working space, fitness center, lounges and amenity space and common outdoor areas for the tenants. Floors 3 – 35 contain entirely residential dwelling units. A green bridge planting area connects the two towers. The 36th Floor contains indoor and outdoor amenity space for residences of the project.
The remaining portion of the property, which contains an office tower, one-story retail building, parking structure and associated landscaping, walkways, and driveways, will not be altered because of the current proposal.
Parking and Circulation
The applicant is requesting a density bonus in accordance with Government Code section 65915, et seq. (State Density Bonus Law) that will be reviewed along with the Stage II submittal. Under State Density Bonus Law, the applicant is not required to comply with a local agency’s parking minimums and is entitled to automatic reduced parking requirements (parking concession). The project provides 942 parking spaces (net 798 new spaces) in one level of at-grade parking and four levels of subterranean parking. For reference, the table below illustrates the minimum number of parking spaces required, as established in the zoning code (Table 30-32-A, GMC Section 30.32.050), and the parking concession allowed under State Density Bonus Law. Vehicular access is proposed from new driveway entrances that are located off Sanchez Drive.
Unit Type Zoning Code
Standard
Required #
of Spaces
State DB Law
Standard
Required #
of spaces
1-bedroom 1 space/unit 594 0.5 space/unit 297
2-bedroom 2 spaces/unit 528 1 space/unit 264
Guest
Parking
1 space/10
units 86 Not required 0
Restaurant 5 spaces/1,000
SF 28 5 spaces/1,000 SF 28
Total
Required 1,236
733
(589 spaces
+ 144
spaces in
demolished
parking lot)
Total
Provided 942
379 of 895
5 a 9
Stage I Preliminary Design Review Analysis
Design review for projects in the DSP is performed by the City Council. A Stage I Design indicates the completion of the schematic, conceptual design phase. The site planning, mass and scale, and architectural style and details of the project have been analyzed by staff with regard to the DSP Gateway District standards and objective design standards applicable to the project, as detailed below.
SITE PLANNING – DSP Chapter 4.1 Urban Design
Overall Site Plan – The project site is the eastern approximately three-quarters of the block created by Sanchez Drive to the north, North Brand Boulevard to the east, West Doran Street to the south and North Central Avenue to the west and is approximately
5.4 acres. Aside from a surface parking lot, located in the northern portion of the site, existing structures/buildings will be maintained. These structures/buildings include a 14-story office tower (611 N. Brand) fronting Brand Boulevard, a one-story retail building (601 N. Brand Boulevard) located at the intersection of Brand Boulevard and Doran Street and a five-story parking garage located in the western portion of the site fronting Doran Street.
The proposed project will be in the northern portion of the site on what is now an approximately 78,000 SF existing surface parking lot containing 144 parking spaces. which will be demolished because of the project. The 858 dwelling units (594 onebedroom units and 264 two-bedroom units) proposed for the project will be contained in two 36-story, 380 FT high towers over a podium level. The first podium level contains a proposed restaurant tenant space at the Brand/Sanchez intersection, two lobbies, leasing office and back-of-house areas associated with the residential use. Co-working space, fitness center, lounges and amenity space are proposed at the second podium level. Residential dwelling units are located on Floors 3 through 35 of the proposed project. A green bridge planting area connects the two towers at this level. The 36th Floor contains indoor and outdoor amenity spaces for the on-site residents.
Proposed publicly accessible open space is largely contained in a new plaza/courtyard opening onto Brand Boulevard and created by the existing office tower to the south and the proposed project. This area will include gently bermed landscaping adjacent to the Brand Boulevard right-of-way with an artistic trellis element creating a focal point and shade for the area, raised planters and paved areas with seating. This space is 100% open to the sky, aside from the area of the proposed trellis element, and orients towards and accesses from public streets. This publicly accessible open space is appropriately integrated within the project’s site planning. Conceptual landscape plans are including with Exhibit 1. The final programming of the publicly accessible open space will be reviewed during the Stage II Design Review application. 380 of 895
6 a 9
The project complies with the building setback requirements of the DSP, which requires a minimum 14-foot setback from Sanchez Drive (8-ft. parkway and 6-ft. sidewalk), and a 16-foot setback from Brand Boulevard. Vehicular access to the project is proposed from two new driveway entrances, located on Sanchez Drive. One of these entrances is in the far western portion of the site and the other, enhanced with a porte cochere, is located at the center of the project site.
4.1.2 Building Heights & Floor Area Ratios
DSP Standards
Gateway District Project Design
Height (by right) 275 FT maximum
Height (w/ incentive) 380 FT maximum
380 FT
Density (by right) 7.25 FAR maximum
Density (w/
incentive) 7.50 FAR maximum
7.5 FAR
The proposed project will be the highest building on the subject site at 380 FT, which is the maximum height in this district allowed with incentives. Although the portion of the site proposed for the current project is approximately 78,180 SF, the entire site is 235,390 SF. The site is currently developed with three building/structures, which will remain. The office tower is 407,534 SF. The one-story commercial building is 12,772 SF. The parking structure is 486,287 SF. When the proposed project is included, total floor area on the site will be 1,764,966 SF, with a 7.5 FAR, at the maximum permitted with incentives for this zone.
4.1.3 Building Setbacks
The project site features a Mixed-Frontage designation along Sanchez Drive, a Primary designation along Brand Boulevard and a Mixed-Use Commercial designation along Doran Street. Projects in the DSP located along Mixed-Frontage streets are required to have a minimum of 14 feet. Projects in the DSP located along a Primary designation are required to follow the Brand Boulevard Plan. The project complies with the required streetscape and setback standards along both Sanchez Drive and Brand Boulevard frontages.
4.1.4 Publicly Accessible Open Space
The project provides the required publicly accessible open space within the newly created plaza area located adjacent to Brand Boulevard in the northern portion of the site, along with the plaza and walkway areas currently located on the site. The publicly 381 of 895
7 a 9
accessible open space is open to the sky, except for the proposed trellis element, oriented towards and accessed from public streets, and integrated within the site planning for the project. The programming of the publicly accessible open space area includes amenities, seating, hardscape, and landscaping and will be reviewed during the Stage II Design Review application. The architect has submitted conceptual landscape plans that show the programming of these areas for consideration.
BUILDING DESIGN – DSP Chapter 4.2 Urban Design
Overall Building Design – In addition to site planning, the primary focus of the Stage I Preliminary Design Review concentrates on the overall massing and scale of the proposed development. The proposed development includes an approximately 31-foothigh podium level which extends the width of the site, above which are two 380-foot residential towers. These towers are slender in stature and do not incorporate the required reductions in floorplates above 200 feet in height or step backs above 60 feet in height. Nor is the required building separation being provided. The applicant will be requesting incentives and waivers from these standards, which will be discussed during the Stage II review.
The contemporary-styled project utilizes various building material, texture, massing, column projections, publicly accessible open space, recessed entries, porte cochere, windows and angular forms to articulate the street-facing facades along Brand Boulevard and Sanchez Drive. The design addresses the public sidewalks with streetlevel facades detailed with human-scaled high-quality materials, including a significant amount of fenestration and limestone. The project drops to one-story at the intersection of Brand and Sanchez where a proposed commercial space (restaurant) will include significant glazing and access to outdoor seating and the publicly accessible open space. Building off the street intersection, the commercial space includes an angular wall, which assists in drawing pedestrians into this open space. Although the project is requesting incentives and waivers from development standards intended to modulate the mass and scale of projects, the separation between the two residential towers, their slender nature, significant fenestration, and slightly angular form generally results in an appropriate mass and scale.
Aside from the items addressed by the staff’s recommended conditions of approval, the Stage I submittal materials in Exhibit 1 indicate that the proposed project is largely consistent with the design standards, policies, and intent of the DSP. A general analysis of the project’s architectural elements is provided below; however, the final details of these elements will be reviewed as part of the Stage II submittal.
Certain subsections of Chapter 4 of the DSP that are not relevant to the Project are excluded, resulting in some jumps between the numbered sections below. 382 of 895
8 a 9
4.2.2 Massing & Scale: Modulation of Height
Of the four available options in this DSP section, the project has incorporated a corner feature. This requires that a prominent corner feature be incorporated into the project that is differentiated by height and design features from the primary massing of the building by a minimum of 10 feet. The area of the project at the Brand/Sanchez intersection is one-story (approximately 20 feet in height). An angular wall aligning with the intersection draws pedestrians into the publicly accessible open space. Aspects used in this corner feature, including significant fenestration and an overhead canopy, are utilized in the balance of the project.
The DSP identifies the intersection of Brand and Sanchez as an “entry location” into downtown Glendale. The applicant should further refine the design of this area of the project to better differentiate it from the remainder of the proposed development (while still being complimentary in overall design) as well as highlight it appropriately as a prominent entrance to downtown Glendale.
The DSP requires a visible and delineated roofline to visually demarcate where the building silhouette meets the sky. The top of the residential towers includes indoor and outdoor (covered and uncovered) amenity spaces for residents of the residential towers, as well as mechanical rooms and elevator and stair overruns.
The building facades of these areas incorporate the same material as is proposed on the lower levels of the project and overall terminate at the roofline is suitable.
4.2.3 Massing & Scale: Façade Modulation
The project has incorporated a clearly delineated base, middle and top in accordance with the standards outlined in this section. The podium level, which includes the ground floor residential lobbies, and “back-of-house” uses, and the level above it, which includes amenity spaces, lounges, co-working space and fitness center form the base of the project and span the entire width of the site along Sanchez. Fenestration pattern and a horizontal architectural element assist in differentiation the base of the project from the remainder of the project.
The middle of the project, containing the residential units, is defined by the consistent use of various types of glazing and aluminum paneling and does not contain significant façade modulation. The top of the project (the 36th floor) steps back significantly from the middle of the building on three sides of the towers to allow for outdoor terraces, an amenity for residents of the project.
4.2.4 Massing & Scale: Building Separations
The standards outlined in this section require a design proposal whose façade 383 of 895
9 a 9
length exceeding 200 feet to include either a building separation that extends to the street level or a building separation that begins at the second floor, no higher than 16 feet in elevation above the sidewalk and provides a distinct architectural style from the surrounding massing. The proposed project will be requesting an incentive to not comply with the “Building Separation” standards. While the two residential towers are separated from each other by the podium level below, this podium is approximately 31 feet above the sidewalk along Sanchez Drive.
4.2.6 Massing & Scale: Landmark Architectural Features
The DSP identifies landmark architectural features, including downtown entry locations, terminated vistas, civic promenades, and paseos. The northeastern portion of the project site (at the intersection of Brand Boulevard and Sanchez Drive) is identified in the DSP an entry location into downtown Glendale and an ideal location for a landmark architectural feature. These features may include towers, prominent building entries, specialize signage or public art. Additionally, landscape setbacks and public pocket parks can also be used to identify these locations. The project is one story at the Brand/Sanchez intersection and will include a commercial tenant. It’s facade treatment, including significant fenestration and an overhead canopy, is like that of the rest of the project at ground level. The angular east wall of the façade, which aligns with the street intersection allows for development of a promenade and facilitates and encourages pedestrians at the intersection to enter and utilize the publicly accessible open space within the project. Refinement of this area, utilizing features described above, will be conditioned to further delineate this area of the project as encouraged by the DSP.
4.2.7 Architectural Elements: Façade Design
The project incorporates architectural elements and design features that articulate the building façades, including high quality and varied building materials, texture, angular building massing, recessed entries, windows, and canopies. These features create a design that is unique and identifiable, while recognizing the priorities of the DSP to enhance ground level architectural elements to be human-scaled and to promote pedestrian activity. The project features a minimal amount of ground level parking that is wrapped by the commercial tenant area, leasing area and residential lobbies, consistent with the DSP requirements (The vast majority of parking is contained in a four-level underground garage). The street-level façades along Brand and Sanchez are incorporated into the overall building design and address the public sidewalk by providing differentiation in the base of the building. At the ground level, significant fenestration is proposed along with a limestone facing material at the elevator towers. The large expanses of glass are subdivided into smaller units. The base of the building is visually separated from the floors above using canopies, a 384 of 895
10 a 9
different fenestration pattern, regularly-spaced columns and by recessing the ground-floor from the floors above. At the street intersection of the ground floor, the angular eastern façade wall directs pedestrian to the publicly accessible open space. Improvements to this space along with the public right-of-way and programming will be reviewed in detail as part of the Stage II Design Review application for this project. The architect has submitted conceptual landscape plans that show the programming of these areas for consideration.
4.2.8 Architectural Elements: Materials
The project is contemporary in design and features materials that reinforce this style. At the ground level of the Sanchez façade, the project includes significant clear glass along with buff-colored limestone and neutral colored glass with ceramic frit at the elevator towers. An aluminum canopy with wood accents is proposed between the first and second levels of the podium. Clear glazing and the canopy wrap around the commercial tenant space on the Brand façade of the project, as well. The proposed materials are consistent with the contemporary aesthetic of the design and the standards outlined in this section of the DSP which encourage high-quality, human-scaled materials to reinforce the pedestrian character of the public realm. The use the materials differentiate between the base and middle volumes of the project. At the upper floors, the ceramic-fritted glass continues and painted aluminum (to match the limestone) is substituted for the limestone at the elevator towers. Neutral-colored insulated glass and charcoal-painted aluminum are proposed on the facades of the residences. Railings on the residential balconies will be clear glass. A detailed look at the building materials will be reviewed during the Stage II Final Design Review application.
4.2.9 Architectural Elements: Storefronts
Storefronts have been incorporated into the design of the project at the ground floor podium frontages where the commercial tenant space, leasing office and lobbies are located. As required by the DSP, the ground floor storefronts are provided on at least half of the façades, will have at least 75% transparency, and will feature canopies above the storefronts on at least 50% of the entire façade.
The design of the ground floor storefronts appropriately establishes the base of the project, with the storefronts and building entrances recessed from the building façades adjacent to the porte cochere. Staff will continue to work with the design team during Stage II to ensure that the final details of the ground floor storefronts incorporate all the standards, such as pedestrian-oriented signage and pedestrian-scaled lighting.
385 of 895
11 a 9
4.2.10 Architectural Elements: Building Lobbies & Entries The DSP requires the incorporation of the following features for lobby areas:
• Canopies, marquees or other weather protection that creates visual prominence;
• Material application that creates continuity with the overall building design while creating a distinct and identifiable aesthetic quality; • A recess or projection to delineate the lobby from the balance of the project; and
• Paving material to differentiate the primary entrance distinct and unique from the adjacent paving material.
The Project features two ground floor residential lobbies, one for each of the proposed towers. Entrances to these lobbies are within the porte cochere and not facing or adjacent to Sanchez Drive. Entrances to the commercial tenant area are located directly off Sanchez Drive as well as from the publicly accessible open space. Refinement of these lobbies/entrances will be necessary in Stage II Design Review to incorporate the features specified in the DSP and better highlight these important areas of the project.
4.2.12 Architectural Elements: Corners
These standards apply only for projects that incorporate the corner feature into their design to comply with height modulation required by Section 4.2.2 of the DSP. As detailed above, the project is incorporating the corner feature into its design, so these requirements are applicable to the proposal. The design incorporates many of the standards specified in this DSP section into the project at the Brand/Sanchez intersection. The use of materials, including glazing and the canopy is consistent with the rest of the Sanchez façade of the project. The angular eastern façade emphasizes the corner feature and directs pedestrians to the publicly accessible open space. Further refinement of this area is recommended, for example, to include unique, complimentary facing materials, lighting, or architectural elements into its design to highlight this component of the project.
4.2.13 Architectural Elements: Canopies
The DSP requires a minimum of 50% of the street elevations to include canopies or marquees. The proposed design incorporates canopies at the ground floor of the street-facing facades that complement the overall building aesthetic and material palette. The canopies are proposed to be aluminum with wood accents.
At the street elevations, at least half of the ground floor façades include 386 of 895
12 a 9
canopies, as required. Material and detail specifications will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Design Review application.
4.2.14 Architectural Elements: Balconies
The project includes private balconies for the residential units as well as rooftop decks for common use of the residents. Per the DSP, no balconies overhang the public right-of-way or building setback, and no more than 40% of the balconies can extend beyond the façade of the building (25% maximum projection of balcony’s full depth). The proposed private residential balcony design does not comply with the “extension” requirement. The applicant is requesting an incentive/waiver for this element of the design. The balcony materials include glass railings that are compatible with the overall contemporary design of the project. The proposed balconies create a visually interesting design as their depths vary and, in concert, create an angular extension from the facades of the towers.
4.2.15 Architectural Elements: Fenestration
The fenestration design distinguishes the base from the middle of the project. At the ground level, the fenestration is subdivided into smaller units. At the residential facades, glazing is more regular in size and pattern. Final details and specifications regarding the fenestration will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Final Design Review application.
4.2.16 Architectural Elements: Fences, Walls, and Gates The drawings do not identify any ground-floor fences, walls, and gates. The details for any fences, walls and gates will be reviewed during the Stage II Final Design Review application. Staff will work with the design team during Stage II to ensure these features are designed to comply with the DSP standards.
4.2.17 Architectural Elements: Planters
The conceptual landscape plans primarily show at-grade landscaping. Raised planters for trees and other plantings are shown to direct pedestrians from the street intersection to the main area of the publicly accessible open space as well as at the podium level common open space. In general, the design minimizes the use of planters. A low seat wall, with benches installed on it separates the Brand Boulevard right-of-way from the bermed turf mound within the publicly accessible open space. Details and specifications regarding the landscaping and the proposed seat wall (to ensure it will not unduly inhibit or discourage access to the open space) will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Final Design Review application.
387 of 895
13 a 9
4.2.20 Architectural Elements: Garage Entries
The project features 942 parking spaces at grade (hidden by the project from public rights-of-way) and in four levels of subterranean parking. Vehicular access is proposed from new driveway entrances at Sanchez Drive. One driveway is in the far western portion of this frontage, while the other bisects the project site and is part of the porte cochere.
Garage entries need to be integrated into the overall building design and not detract from the streetscape and pedestrian realm. The details and specifications regarding the entries will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Final Design Review application; however, in general, the garage design is consistent with the DSP.
Garage entries located on the street shall conform to the following standards:
a. Utilities shall not be visible from the street frontage. Projects shall provide screening, dropped ceilings, or locate utilities away from areas visible from the pedestrian level.
b. Garage doors or gates shall be set back from the face of the building. c. A unique or enhanced paving pattern shall be provided on the driveway, equal to the width of the garage entry to create visual separation and acknowledge potential conflicts with other modes of transportation. d. The width of the garage opening shall be as narrow as possible.
4.2.21 Architectural Elements: Utilities
Utility rooms for the project are generally proposed at the ground level within the main body of the project. While most back-of-house areas are located behind the “active” uses along Sanchez Drive, including the commercial tenant space and lobbies, in the far western portion of the site, they directly front this street.
The DSP requires that utility rooms be screened and incorporated into the building to provide the visual appearance of a storefront. The details and specifications regarding utility locations and integration into the building design will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Design Review application. Utilities will be required to comply with the standards outlined in this section.
4.2.22 Architectural Elements: Lighting
Per GMC Section 30.30.040 and the DSP, all exterior lighting shall be directed onto the driveways, walkways, and parking areas within the development and away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. Further, the DSP encourages significant architectural features such as corners or unique cornices to be illuminated and enhanced by comprehensive lighting design. A conceptual lighting plan has been submitted, and a final lighting plan will be required as part of the Stage II Design Review application.
388 of 895
14 a 9
4.2.23 Architectural Elements: Signage
This section of the DSP requires compliance with GMC Chapter 30.33 (Signs) and outlines standards related to signage to enhance the pedestrian experiences within downtown Glendale. Further, it requires developments that provide publicly accessible open space, such as the proposed project, to provide signage describing that it is part of the City’s Privately Owned Public Open Space Program. This signage is required to be visible from the public right-of-way and sidewalk and state that the area is open to the public from at least 7 am until 10:00 pm.
THE PEDESTRIAN REALM – DSP Chapter 4.3 Urban Design
The subject site has frontage on three streets: Sanchez Drive, Brand Boulevard and Doran Street. The proposed project has frontage on Sanchez Drive and Brand Boulevard. Sanchez Drive is designated as a “Mixed-Frontage” street, and Brand Boulevard is designated as a “Primary” street.
Improvements to the public right-of-way will be reviewed in detail as part of the Stage II Design Review application.
4.3.1 Primary Street
Brand Boulevard (adjacent to the project site) is identified as a Primary Street. It is one of the City’s widest streets with a landscaped center median with street trees, multiple lanes of vehicular traffic and a substantial public right-of-way setback. Brand Boulevard is also one of the City’s signature pedestrian-oriented streets, which is lined with active, ground floor commercial uses. The Primary Street designation follows the streetscape plan established for Brand Boulevard Plan.
4.3.2 Mixed-Use Commercial Street
Mixed-Use Commercial streets are required to comply with the following standards:
• All parkways shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width from face of curb and provide a 4-foot wide paved area every 20 feet to allow for unloading of vehicles;
• Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide with no overlapping use by urban amenities such as seating, trash receptacles and signage; • The building adjacent zone shall be a minimum of 3 feet in depth and used for a minimum of 50% outdoor seating. The balance shall be used for landscaping;
389 of 895
15 a 9
• The ground floor of the building frontage shall be a minimum of 16 feet in height and a maximum of 20 feet;
• Retail and neighborhood services are preferred uses along Mixed-Use Commercial streets and shall comprise more than 50% of the entire project frontage;
• Commercial storefronts shall follow the standards established in Section
4.2.9;
• 75% of the street elevation shall be transparent;
• Seating shall be provided at a ratio of one seat for every 50 linear feet in the parkway zone; and
• Public art may be located within the parkway zone.
Sanchez Drive is identified as a Mixed-Frontage Street. Mixed-Frontage streets are required to follow the same standards as Mixed-Use Commercial streets, with the following exceptions:
• Parkways shall be 8 feet wide and no paved area for unloading of vehicles is required;
• Sidewalk width shall be 8 feet;
• Retail and neighborhood services shall comprise no more than 25% of the entire project frontage; and
• 50% of the ground floor façade or elevation shall be transparent.
OPEN SPACE – DSP Chapter 5
5.3.1, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 Open Space Requirements
For developments with an FAR greater than 3.0, the DSP requires 20% of the gross site area to be open space, with 10% of the gross site area to be dedicated as publicly accessible open space (50% of required open space). An additional 140 SF of residential open space is required per residential unit (can be provided as publicly accessible open space, common open space or private open space).
DSP Standards Project
Design
Open Space for project > 3.0
FAR
20% x 235,390 SF = 47,078 SF
min. 81,743 SF
Publicly Accessible Open
Space (50% of required open
space)
50% x 47,078 SF = 23,539 SF
min. 34,161 SF
Residential Open Space
(140 SF per residential unit)
140 x 858 units = 120,120 SF
min.
128,320
SF
390 of 895
16 a 9
The Stage 1 submittal for the project includes conceptual landscape plans showing programming of the proposed publicly accessible plaza/courtyard created by the existing office tower and the proposed project adjacent to Brand Boulevard, as well as existing accessible open space currently located within the project site. Details and specifications regarding the landscaping and open space areas will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Design Review application.
As detailed in the chart above, the entire 235,390 SF project site provides a total of 34,161 SF of publicly accessible open space. The project features a total of 128,320 SF of residential open space on the project site in the form of private residential balconies. In addition, the project features 47,582 SF of common open space (shown as part of the open space required for the project in the top row of the chart above) in the form of the podium level amenity space, the third level green bridge planting area connecting the two residential towers and the roof terraces on each tower. These areas are accessible to residents of the proposed project but will not be publicly accessible. Landscape plans included with the Stage I submittal provide conceptual programming and includes, pool and spa areas, outdoor lounges and seating, dining, cabanas, and recreational spaces on the podium level and landscaping on the green bridge. Covered and uncovered terraces (and enclosed amenity space) are proposed on the rooftops of both towers. Currently, these areas are unprogrammed. Stage II Design Review will need to include landscaping and programming for these common open areas.
5.4.1 Publicly Accessible Open Space - Courtyards & Plazas The project’s publicly accessible open space includes a plaza/courtyard created by the existing office tower and the proposed project in the eastern portion of the site as well as open spaces and walkways within the existing development. The primary function of publicly accessible open spaces is to encourage social interaction and activities, to expand and reinforce the public realm, and contribute to the livability of the downtown. The publicly accessible open spaces will comply with the DSP requirements that include:
• Open to the sky;
• Fully accessible on one or two sides;
• Located at the sidewalk level;
• Include a special feature such as public art, a water feature or specimen tree;
• Include large canopy trees (1 tree per 600 SF minimum); • Provide landscaping primarily at grade (minimum 25% of open space with maximum 25% in raised planters);
• Feature pedestrian scaled lighting, signage and wayfinding, seating, waste receptacles, etc.
391 of 895
17 a 9
Specific design of the publicly accessible open space will take place at Stage II Design Review of the project.
5.5 Residential Development Open Space.
Additional open space, above that which is required as a percentage of the area of the project site, is required to ensure quality-of-live standards and access to light and air for building residents, occupants and guests. A minimum of 140 SF of open space is required for each residential unit and can be private open space or common (publicly accessible or not) open space. The project provides a total of 128,320 SF of residential open space that private open space and 47,582 SF of common open space. The private open space is provided in the form of balconies for the residential units. The common open space is located on the second floor podium level, third floor green bridge as well as the roofs of both towers. These areas are accessible to residents of the project but not to the public. Landscape plans included with the Stage I submittal provide conceptual programming for the podium level open space and includes, pool and spa areas, outdoor lounges and seating, dining, cabanas, and recreational spaces and landscaping for the green bridge. Final details and specifications regarding the residential open space areas will be reviewed as part of the Stage II Final Design Review application.
5.6 Public Art Program
Development in the DSP is required to include on-site public art, equal to 2% of project value, subject to review by the Arts & Culture Commission and approval by the City Council. Alternatively, this requirement may be met by paying an amount equivalent to 1% of project value to the City’s Urban Art Fund. It is anticipated that the applicant will be paying the in-lieu fee.
MOBILITY – DSP Chapter 6 Mobility
The DSP designates Brand Boulevard at this location as both a Vehicular and Transit Priority Street and as a Signature Street. Vehicular Priority streets give first priority to moving automobile traffic. Transit Priority streets give priority emphasis on moving transit, even at the expense of some loss of performance of automobile traffic. Multifunction streets, like Brand Boulevard, need to balance the needs of different modes of transportation as they compete for limited space. The DSP calls for a rational, practical method of compromise whereby the net gain for the community can be maximized while the net impact on different modes and context can be minimized. Brand Boulevard is also a signature street due to its unique identity as Glendale’s “main street”. An existing LADOT Commuter Express stop is located adjacent to the project site on Sanchez Drive. South of Doran Street on the west side of Brand Boulevard are Metro Local and Glendale Beeline stops.
392 of 895
18 a 9
COMMUNITY BENEFITS – DSP Chapter 7
The residential project is utilizing the “Community Benefit for Certain Uses” Incentive as permitted by Section 7.2 of the DSP, and which also defines the baseline residential density as 250 dwelling units per acre. The project site is 5.4 acres with a density bonus threshold of 1,350 units. The project qualifies for a density bonus because the 858-unit project will set aside 15% of the residential units (129) for very low-income households, in accordance with State Density Bonus Law. Per DSP 4.1.2, the maximum FAR of 7.5 and the maximum height of 380 feet in the DSP Gateway District applies; the project complies with these maximums. The Density Bonus application will be included with the Stage II submittal for consideration.
SUMMARY COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATION
Aside from the issues addressed by the recommended conditions of approval, the Stage I submittal is largely consistent with the design standards, policies, and intent of the Downtown Specific Plan. Because conceptual Stage I submittals are not expected to be fully fleshed out, there is an opportunity to provide more information about elements of the design that have not been finalized for Stage II.
Based on the above analysis of the project documents, staff recommends that City Council approve the Stage I Preliminary Design Review with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall refine the design of the project at the Brand/Sanchez intersection (commercial tenant area) to better differentiate it from the remainder of the proposed development and highlight it as a prominent downtown Glendale entrance and landmark architectural feature location. This could include unique, complimentary facing materials, lighting, signage or architectural elements.
2. The applicant shall refine the designs of the lobbies/entrances to the residential towers to incorporate the features specified in the DSP and better highlight these important areas of the project.
3. The applicant shall provide landscaping and programming for the common open space proposed on the rooftop towers.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The Code requires publication of public notices when the Council considers approval of entitlements such as design review. Staff has published all required notices and has mailed copies of the notices to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the project. Public notices have also been posted on-site.
393 of 895
19 a 9
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the Stage I Design submission. However, if developed, the project would have a fiscal impact consistent with other quality residential projects, including new property taxes, building permit/plan check fees, and potential increased sales tax by expanding the downtown residential base. There will be an undetermined cost associated with the increased public service delivery of the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Environmental review is not required for preliminary Stage I Design Review; the environmental review will be prepared and presented to City Council at the Stage II Design Review.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the Stage I Preliminary Design Submission with staff’s recommended conditions;
Alternative 2: Approve the Stage I Preliminary Design Submission subject to design recommendations made by the City Council, with or without staff’s recommended conditions;
Alternative 3: Deny approval of the Stage I Preliminary Design Submission and direct a redesign of the project;
Alternative 4: The City Council may also consider any other alternative for the Stage I Preliminary Design Submission not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Prepared by:
Roger Kiesel, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:
Kristen Asp, Principal Planner
394 of 895
20 a 9
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Stage I Design Submission
Exhibit 2: Campaign Finance Disclosure
395 of 895
MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____________, seconded by Council Member __________, that upon review and consideration of all materials in connection with the Stage I preliminary design submittal for a proposed new 858-unit, 858,000 square-foot multi-family development contained in two 380-ft. high towers over a podium level, to be located at 601 North Brand Boulevard, Glendale, California (Case No. PDR 000628- 2022), the City Council approves the Stage I preliminary design, as outlined in the November 14, 2023 staff report from the Director of Community Development, subject to staff recommendations contained therein or attached hereto, and subject to Council comments thereon.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
396 of 895
601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
SOLOMON CORDWELL BUENZ
NOVEMBER 29, 2022
STAGE 1 - SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
397 of 895
NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
P R O J E C T I N F O R M A T I O N
3 SUMMARY
4 SITE CONTEXT
8 9 STATE DENSITY PROVISIONS
AREA MATRIX
10 FAR CALCULATIONS
11 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
A R C H I T E C T U R E
13 SITE PLAN
14 FLOOR PLANS
21 MATERIAL PALETTE
22 ELEVATIONS
26 SECTIONS
28 PROJECT RENDERINGS
L A N D S C A P E
LA-1 OVERALL PLAN
LA-2 PLAZA PLAN
LA-3 PODIUM PLAN
LA-4 PLANT MATERIALS
LA-5 PRECEDENT IMAGERY
LA-6 IRRIGATION PLAN
L I G H T I N G
L-1 PLAZA CONCEPT AND PLAN
L-3 PODIUM CONCEPT AND PLAN
L-5 INTERIOR AMENITY CONCEPT
L-6
L-8 PORTE COCHERE AND LOBBY CONCEPT AND PLAN
ELEVATOR AND RECEPTION CONCEPT AND PLAN
L-10 ROOF SOFFIT CONCEPT
L-11 PARKING GARAGE CONCEPT AND PLANS 398 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 3
P R O J E C T S U M M A R Y
The Project occupies a true Gateway Site at the intersection of Brand Boulevard and Sanchez Drive immediately above the Ventura Freeway; this high visibility calls for special attention to how the Project addresses the public realm and completes the local urban context.
The 858 rental apartments are proposed in 380' high twin towers over a generous amenity deck, with all tenant parking below grade. The primary organizer of the Project's architecture is the adjacent Freeway and the arrangement of both Public and Private high quality open space on the long but very narrow Site.
In order to create tenant amenity spaces of workable depth, the towers are pushed to the northern boundary of the Site, holding the streetwall and maximizing daylight into the narrow area remaining. A new Public Plaza is proposed holding the corner itself and acts as a landmark upon entering into the City Center and acts as an intimate anchor for public gatherings: an urban 'Living Room.' These two spaces are then visually connected by a terraced landscape, the balconies of the Eastern tower positioned just above, creating a lively, medium-scaled space activated in all three dimensions.
A Retail program reaches out towards - but not quite on - the actual corner of Brand and Sanchez and serves as the crucial fourth side to both contain and create the new urban Plaza. The Retail and tenant amenities program together form a sheltering arm against the noise of the Freeway, and allow the towers to remain very simple and understated above: interesting but quiet northern facades face the freeway and form a hard edge, while the southern expression is defined by the soft and graceful curves of the balconies facing the occupied open spaces below and act as a substantial mitigator to excess solar gain into the units themselves.
399 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 4
P R O J E C T S I T E
S A N C H E Z D R
S I T E
L A D O W N T O W N
G L E N D A L E D O W N T O W N
B U I L D A B L E A R E A
N
B R A N D
B L V D
N C E N T R A L
A V E
V E N T U R A F W Y
400 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 5
P R O J E C T S I T E
S A N C H E Z D R
E D O R A N S T
P I O N E E R D R
G O O D E A V E
N C E N T R A L A V E
N O R A N G E S T
N B R A N D B L V D
V E N T U R A F W Y
S I T E
B U I L D A B L E A R E A
7 8 1 8 0 S Q F T
401 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 6
S I T E P H O T O S
N . B R A N D B O U L E V A R D
S A N C H E Z D R I V E
402 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 7 3 5 0 ’ A L T I T U D E P E R S P E C T I V E
NORTH - GLENDALE DOWNTOWN EAST - ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST AND SAN
BERNARDINO NATIONAL PARK
SOUTH - LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN WEST - TOPANGA STATE PARK AND GRIFFITH PARK
N O R T H - G L E N D A L E D O W N T O W N
E A S T - A N G E L E S N A T I O N A L F O R E S T
A N D S A N B E R N A R D I N O N A T I O N A L P A R K
S O U T H - L O S A N G E L E S D O W N T O W N
W E S T - T O P A N G A S T A T E P A R K A N D
G R I F F I T H P A R K
403 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 8
A R E A M A T R I X
601 North BRAND Blvd - FAR 7.5
TYPE IA ActiveSite 78,180 Total Site Area 235,390
Residential Amenity Retail Lobby (FAR) (FAR) (Plate) Private Public Parking Parking Area 450 650 725 900 or per project GSF OS OS Spaces 1 stall/1BR; 594 req'd 594.00 prov'd units/ flr. ST 1Br 1BR+ 2BR Restaurant tower total Prov'd Prov'd Prov'd GSF Req'd Prov'd 2 stalls/2BR; 528 req'd 476.00 prov'd flr. Elev. f / f Flr. guest stalls 1/10 units; 86 req'd 86.00 prov'd 1,236 all stalls 9'x18' 1,184 restaurant stalls 5/1000sf; 28 req'd 28.00 prov'd +379.84 Roof 2.76 spaces per unit
+362.34 17.5 Mech 0 0 6,622
+351.34 11 36 0 4,575 6,622 13,244 15,399 5,210 Private Open Space +340.34 11 35 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 Req'd Prov'd +330.68 9.667 34 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+321.01 9.667 33 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 120,120 186,272 +311.34 9.667 32 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 (project total) +301.68 9.667 31 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+292.01 9.667 30 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 Public Open Space Plaza 14830.00 +282.34 9.667 29 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 Req'd Prov'd Sanchez frontage 512.00 +272.68 9.667 28 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 Brand frontage 5784.00 +263.01 9.667 27 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 47,078 20% of Site 97,847 non-contiguous OS 10569.00 +253.34 9.667 26 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 (project total) surplus OS in towers 66152.00 +243.67 9.667 25 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+234.01 9.667 24 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 Bicycle Parking +224.34 9.667 23 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 Req'd Prov'd +214.67 9.667 22 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+205.01 9.667 21 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 43 ST & 215 LT 50 ST & 220 LT +195.34 9.667 20 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005 1/20 units short-term+1/4units long term +185.67 9.667 19 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+176.01 9.667 18 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+166.34 9.667 17 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+156.67 9.667 16 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+147.00 9.667 15 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+137.34 9.667 14 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+127.67 9.667 13 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+118.00 9.667 12 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+108.34 9.667 11 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+98.67 9.667 10 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+89.00 9.667 09 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+79.34 9.667 08 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+69.67 9.667 07 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+60.00 9.667 06 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+50.33 9.667 05 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+40.67 9.667 04 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 15,412 2,005
+31.00 9.667 03 13 0 3 6 4 11,690 23,380 16,576 7,600
+18.00 13 02 0 0 0 0 0 9,611 11,291 18,263 61,473 32,332 Fitness Ctr Removed from FAR +0.00 18 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,556 2,104 27,837 55,673 58,866 0 31,695 50 29,700 -12.00 12 B1 189 71,141
-22.00 10 B2 189 71,141
-32.00 10 B3 189 71,141
-42.00 10 B4 189 71,141
-52.00 10 B5 189 71,141
-62.00 10 B6 189 71,141
PER TOWER 429 0 99 198 132 14,186 5,556 2,104 431,520 652,120 109,302 1,184 456,546 units / tower ST 1Br 1BR+ 2BR spaces GSF
0.0% 23.1% 46.2% 30.8%
PROJECT TOTALS 858 0 198 396 264 28372 5,556 3,598 858,720 186,272 97,847 692.53846 average unit size
66,152
Copyright Solomon C
404 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 9
S T A T E D E N S I T Y B O N U S P R O V I S I O N S T A K E N 601 N Brand, Glendale
DENSITY BONUS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING DSP Incentive / Waiver Argumen Proposing 129 Affordable Units. Meets Glendale IZO requirement of 15% of total units and (1) incentive for density bonus. N/A DENSITY BONUS: INCENTIVES/WAIVERS
11. Building floorplates above 200' high shall be reduced in area by 15% (4.2.C). 4.2.C Waiver Reducing ar
14. High rise facades above 60ft must be stepped back a minimum of 20 ft. (4.2.M) 4.2.M Waiver Step back w
17. Building facades over 200 ft. in length must include building separation at the street level or at 16 ft. above street level (4.2.4.A) 18.
Building separation must be at least 40 ft. wide (4.2.4.B).
4.2.4 Incentive
28. No more than 40% of balconies shall extend beyond the building façade and project a maximum of 25% of balconies full depth (4.2.14) 4.2.14 Waiver To 'inboard wall results
unit area
DENSITY BONUS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Proposing 129 Affordable Units. Meets Glendale IZO requirement of 15% of proposed units and (1) incentive for density bonus.
DSP DENSITY BONUS: INCENTIVES & WAIVERS TYPE
4.2.4 Building facades over 200 ft. in length must include building separation at the street level or at 16 ft. above street level and building separation must be at least 40 ft. wide.
Incentive
4.2.C Building floorplates above 200' high shall be reduced in area by 15% Waiver
4.2.M High rise facades above 60ft must be stepped back a minimum of 20 ft. Waiver
4.2.14 No more than 40% of balconies shall extend beyond the building façade and project a maximum of 25% of balconies full depth Waiver 405 of 895 ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 10
F A R C A L C U L A T I O N S
STAGING STAGING
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
5000sf
OPEN
TO
BELOW
*REFER TO AREA MATRIX FOR MORE DETAILED CALCULATIONS
G R O U N D F L O O R
P R O J E C T T O T A L : 8 5 8 , 7 2 0
FAR TOTAL: 55,673 (27,837 PER TOWER)
T Y P I C A L T O W E R ( L 3 - L 3 5 )
FAR TOTAL: 23,380 (11,690 PER TOWER)
P O D I U M ( L 2 )
FAR TOTAL: 18,263 (11,291 PER TOWER)
*FITNESS CENTER REMOVED FROM FAR (4,319)
R O O F ( L 3 6 )
FAR TOTAL: 13,244 (6,622 PER TOWER)
COMBINED FAR: 23,380 x 33 FLOORS = 771,540
406 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 11
P U B L I C O P E N S P A C E
STAGING STAGING
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
G R O U N D F L O O R
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC TOTAL: 97,847 SF
CONTIGUOUS OPEN SPACE
SITE OVERALL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
CONTIGUOUS : 21,126 SF
OTHER : 10,569 SF
SURPLUS OS IN TOWERS : 66,152 SF
407 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 12
P R I V A T E O P E N S P A C E
5000sf
OPEN
TO
BELOW
P O D I U M ( L 2 )
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
TOTAL: 32,332 SF
LEVEL 2: 32,332SF
T Y P I C A L T O W E R ( L 3 - L 3 5 )
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
TOTAL: 143,520 SF
TYPICAL LEVEL: 2,005 SF
LEVEL 3 : 7,600 SF
R O O F ( L 3 6 )
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
TOTAL: 10,420 SF
LEVEL 36 : 5,210
OPEN SPACE AT L3 ONLY
PRIVATE TOTAL: 186,272 SF
408 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 14, 2022 2
S I T E P L A N
SANCHEZ DRIVE
E. DORAN STREET
ORANGE STREET
N. BRAND BOULEVARD
VENTURA FREEWAY
N CENTRAL AVENUE
PIONEER DRIVE
E X I S T I N G
P A R K I N G
G A R A G E
E X I S T I N G
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
E X I S T I N G
R E T A I L
GARAGE
ACCESS
EXISTING LOADING AREA
TO BE MAINTAINED
NATURALLY VENTILATED
PROPERTY LINE (RED)
PROPERTY LINE (RED)
PROPERTY LINE (RED)
407,534 FAR
14 FLOORS / 165'
486,287 FAR
5 FLOORS
12,772 FAR
1 FLOOR
+459
+461
+451
+452
+446
GARAGE
ACCESS
GARAGE
ACCESS GARAGE
ACCESS
(ONE-WAY)
E . D O R A N S T R E E T
N . B R A N D B O U L E V A R D
S A N C H E Z D R I V E
A M E N I T Y D E C K P L A Z A
W E S T T O W E R E A S T T O W E R O R A N G E S T R E E T
N C E N T R A L A V E N U E
X X X X X X X X X
1 ” = 8 0 ’
NOVEMBER 29, 2022 13
409 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 14 P A R K I N G G A R A G E | B 1 - B 4
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(32 stacked)
0 10 50
45 410 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 15 G R O U N D F L O O R P L A N | L 1
DOCK
EXISTING PARKING GARAGE
OFFICE BUILDING
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
GENERATOR
EMERG.
ELEC.
RM. LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
W. TWR
TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC
LEASING
DOCK
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
STAGING STAGING
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
STAGING
FCC
RESTAURANT
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS
STAGING
MPOE BFP
5556sf
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
EXTG. DOCK TO
REMAIN
DOCK
PLAZA
REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(56 stacked)
BIKE
SHOP
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
RESIDENTS'
PARK
ENTRY
E. TWR
TRANSFORMER
VAULT
PORTE
COCHERE
GARAGE
ENTRY
POOL
ABOVE
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(56 stacked)
N . B R A N D B O U L E V A R D
S A N C H E Z D R I V E
0 10 50
45 411 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 16 P O D I U M - A M E N I T Y P L A N | L 2
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 WEST
LOUNGE
EAST
LOUNGE
CO-WORKING BRIDGE
FITNESS
CENTER
5000sf
4570sf
AMENITY
SPACE
5000sf
OPEN
TO
BELOW
0 10 50
45 412 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 17 L E V E L 3 P L A N | L 3
1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR
2BR 1BR 1BR 2BR
2BR 1BR
1BR
1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR
2BR 1BR 1BR 2BR
2BR 1BR
1BR P1
P2
P3
P/S
E
P1
P2
P3
P/S
E
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 GREEN BRIDGE PLANTING AREA SKYLITE
0 10 50
45 413 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 18 T Y P. T O W E R P L A N | L 4 - L 3 5
1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR
2BR 1BR 1BR 2BR
2BR 1BR
1BR
1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR
2BR 1BR 1BR 2BR
2BR 1BR
1BR P1
P2
P3
P/S
E
P1
P2
P3
P/S
E
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 0 10 50
45 414 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 19 R O O F - A M E N I T Y P L A N | L 3 6
P1
P2
P3
P/S
AMENITY
SPACE
4600sf
AMENITY
SPACE
4600sf
TERRACE
4000sf
TERRACE
4000sf
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
COVERED
TERRACE
COVERED
TERRACE
COVERED
TERRACE
COVERED
TERRACE
0 10 50
45 415 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 20
R O O F P L A N
0 10 50
45 416 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 21
M A T E R I A L S P A L E T T E
PANELIZED WOOD LIMESTONE NEUTRAL GLASS W/
CERAMIC FRIT
ALUMINUM - PAINTED
TO MATCH LIMESTONE
PAINTED ALUMINUM -
CHARCOAL
NEUTRAL GLASS
417 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 22
E L E V A T I O N - N
ROO F
E L: 380’ - 0”
L EV E L 36 - AM ENITY D ECK
E L: 351’ - 4”
L EV E L 3 R ESID ENTIA L
E L: 31’ - 0”
L EV E L 2 - AM ENITY
E L: 18’ - 0 ”
GROUND F LOOR
E L: 0’ - 0”
BRAND BOU L EVARD
9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 11'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 13'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 14'-0" 18'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 22' 0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 17 1
1 8
9 6
1 2
9 1 1
8 M A T E R I A L L E G E N D
1 ALUMINUM CANOPY W/ WOOD ACCENT
2 NEUTRAL COLORED GLASS W/ CERAMIC FRIT
3 PAINTED ALUMINUM - MATCH LIMESTONE
4 PAINTED ALUMINUM - CHARCOAL
5 NEUTRAL COLORED, HIGH PERFORMANCE
INSULATED GLASS
6 CLEAR GLASS RAILING
7 ULTRA CLEAR, LOW-IRON GLASS
8 NATURAL BUFF COLORED LIMESTONE
9 CLEAR GLASS
3 6
4 8
9 5
8 5
418 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 23
E L E V A T I O N - E
ROO F
E L: 380’ - 0”
L EV E L 36 - AM ENITY D ECK
E L: 351’ - 4”
L EV E L 3 R ESID ENTIA L
E L: 31’ - 0”
L EV E L 2 - AM ENITY
E L: 18’ - 0 ”
GROUND F LOOR
E L: 0’ - 0”
9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 11'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 13'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 14'-0" 18'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 22' 0" 9'-8" 9'-8"
SANCH EZ DRIV E
E DORAN STR E E T
419 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 24
E L E V A T I O N - S
ROO F
E L: 380’ - 0”
L EV E L 36 - AM ENITY D ECK
E L: 351’ - 4”
L EV E L 3 R ESID ENTIA L
E L: 31’ - 0”
L EV E L 2 - AM ENITY
E L: 18’ - 0 ”
GROUND F LOOR
E L: 0’ - 0”
BRAND BOU L EVARD
9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 11'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 13'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 14'-0" 18'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 22' 0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 420 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 25
E L E V A T I O N - W
ROO F
E L: 380’ - 0”
L EV E L 36 - AM ENITY D ECK
E L: 351’ - 4”
L EV E L 3 R ESID ENTIA L
E L: 31’ - 0”
L EV E L 2 - AM ENITY
E L: 18’ - 0 ”
GROUND F LOOR
E L: 0’ - 0”
9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 11'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 13'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 9'-8" 14'-0" 18'-0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 22' 0" 9'-8" 9'-8" 421 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 26
S E C T I O N - E / W
M ECHANICA L PH
AM ENITY AM ENITY
R ESID ENTIA L
GYM LOUNG E LOUNG E
LOBBY
M ECHANICA L PH
AM ENITY AM ENITY
BOH LOBBY BOH R E TAI L
R ESID ENTIA L
ROO F
E L: 380’ - 0”
L EV E L 36 - AM ENITY D ECK
E L: 351’ - 4”
L EV E L 3 R ESID ENTIA L
E L: 31’ - 0”
L EV E L 2 - AM ENITY
E L: 18’ - 0 ”
GROUND F LOOR
E L: 0’ - 0”
L EV E L B5
E L: -46’ - 8”
BRAND BOU L EVARD
422 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 27
S E C T I O N - N / S
LOUNG E
R ESID ENTIA L
ROO F
E L: 380’ - 0”
PH
AM ENITY
BOH R E TAI L E DORAN STR E E T SANCH EZ DRIV E
V ENTURA FR E EWAY
GARAG E
22' 0"
18'-0"
14'-0"
13'-0"
11'-0" - 46'-8" 4 FLOORS @ 9'-4" 309'-4" 32 FLOORS @ 9'-8" L EV E L 36 - AM ENITY D ECK
E L: 351’ - 4”
L EV E L 3 R ESID ENTIA L
E L: 31’ - 0”
L EV E L 2 - AM ENITY
E L: 18’ - 0 ”
GROUND F LOOR
E L: 0’ - 0”
L EV E L B5
E L: -46’ - 8”
423 of 895
0 10 50
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 28 L O O K I N G S O U T H A L O N G N B R A N D B L V D 424 of 895 ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 29 L O O K I N G W E S T A C R O S S N B R A N D B L V D 425 of 895 ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 30 L A N D M A R K C O R N E R 426 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 31 B U I L D I N G E N T R A N C E 427 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 32 P L A Z A 428 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 LA-1
L A N D S C A P E C O N C E P T P L A N - O V E R A L L ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
429 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 LA-2
L A N D S C A P E C O N C E P T P L A N - G R O U N D L E V E L ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-2 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Iconic Overhead Structure
Enhanced Paving at Project Entry
Street Trees
Umbrellas
Accent Tree Bosque
Turf Mound (3’Max, 6:1 Slope) with Accent Wall
4 5
6 7
8 3
2 1
P O D I U M
LEVEL
P O D I U M
LEVEL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
1 5 4 5
6 2
7 3
8 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - GROUND LEVEL
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
430 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 LA-3
L A N D S C A P E C O N C E P T P L A N - P O D I U M L E V E L ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-3 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LEGEND
Lounge Patio
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
5 Big Dog Park
13 4
12 3
11 6
14 15
16 17
7 2 8
10 1
9 E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
BRIDGE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER
A M E N I T Y
SPACE
O F F I C E
BUILDING
G R O U N D
LEVEL
5 4 14 16
17 12 13 9 8 6 10 11 6 3 8 12 2 9
1 11 7 1
9 15
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - PODIUM LEVEL 431 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 LA-4
L A N D S C A P E P L A N T M A T E R I A L S
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-4 Collaborative
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE
TREE SCHEDULE:
SHRUB SCHEDULE:
Alnus rhombifolia White Alder 24” box
Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 24” box
Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree 24” box
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 24” box
Olea europaea ‘Swan Hills’ Swan Hills Olive 48” box
Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 24” box
Phoenix dactylifera* Date Palm* 16’ BTH
Platanus acerfolia London Plane Tree 24” box
Platanus racemose California Sycamore 24” box
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 48” box
Quercus ilex Holly Oak 48” box
Ulmus parvifolia Semi-evergreen Chinese Elm 24” box
Note: *Palms only for pool area use.
Arbutus unedo ‘Compacta’ Dwarf Strawberry Tree 15g
Dianella spp. Flax Lily 5g
Hibiscus spp. Hibiscus 15g
Lantana spp. Lantana 5g
Prunus llicifolia Holly-leafed Cherry 15g
Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Berry 5g
Rose spp. Rose 5g
Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary 5g
Salvia officinalis Sage 5g
Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle 15g
Xylosma congestum Shiny Xylosma 5g
Agapanthus arfricanus Lily of the Nile 5g
Baccharis pilularis Prostrate Coyote Bush 1g
Ceanothus griseus var Horizontalis Carmel Creeper 5g
Dietes vegeta Fortnight Lily 5g
Ferns (Many Varieties) 5g
Hermerocallis Daylily 5g
Jasminum multiflorum Star Jasmine 1g
Kniphofia uvaria Red Hot Poker 5g
Lavandula dentata French lavender 5g
Lonicera japonica Hall’s Honeysuckle 1g
Myoporum pervifolium Pacifica Myoporum 1g
Penstemon spp. Penstemon 5g
Vinca major Common Periwinkle 1g
GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE:
LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIALS 432 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 LA-5
L A N D S C A P E P R E C E D E N T I M A G E R Y
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
5 Collaborative
11.11.2022 LLANDSCAPE DESIGN IMAGERY 433 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 LA-6
L A N D S C A P E C O N C E P T P L A N - I R R I G A T I O N ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-1 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
LEGEND
Glendale Living Room Plaza
Bleacher Seating
Outdoor Kitchen with BBQ and Dining
Bar Seating with Overhead Trellis
Spa (16’x11’)
Pool (100’x22’)
Lounge Seating
Umbrellas
Pool Enclosure Fence
Iconic Overhead Structure
Linear Overhead Structure
Palm Tree Planters
Turf Mound
Social Seating Area
Event Lawn
Mix-use Patio
Small Dog Park
Big Dog Park
Lounge Patio
Street Trees
5 13
4 12
3 11
6 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
7 8
2 10
1 9
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
6 5 15
17 18
1 13 14 10 9 7 11 12 7 4 9 11 3 10
2 19 19
20 16 20
9 8 12
10 10
O F F I C E
BUILDING
E X I S T I N G
PARKING GRAGE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRESS | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER.18.2022 L-6 Collaborative
0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”
HYDROZONE LEGEND
E A S T
LOUNGE
C O - W O R K I N G
SPACE
W E S T
LOUNGE
F I T N E S S
CENTER A M E N I T Y
SPACE
N. BRAND BLVD
SANCHEZ DR
CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION MASTER PLAN - OVERALL
O F F I C E
BUILDING
ENTRY
Low Water Use
Medium Water use
High Water Use
Pool/Spa Water Feature
Artificial Turf
Hydrozone: Eto: KL LA Sq. Ft. Conversion SLA Sq. Ft. MAWA Landscaped Area- Ground Level 43.7 0.55 23,805 0.62 NA 354,735 MAWA= Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year)
0.50= Evapotraspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF)
1.0= ETAF for Sprcial Landscaped Area
LA= Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet)
0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot)
0.3= the additional ET adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Area (1.0- 0.7= 0.3) SLA= Speical Landscape Area (square feet)
Applicant to fill in boxes below:
Eto (Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C inches per year) Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) Speical Landscape Area (square feet)
Hydrozone: Eto: KL Sq. Ft. Conversion IE EAWU
Low Water Use Shrubs (Drip) 43.7 0.2 1,935 0.62 0.90 11,650 Medium Water Use Shrubs (Drip) 43.7 0.5 7,410 0.62 0.80 125,479 High Water Use (Rotor) 43.7 0.7 3,560 0.62 0.80 84,398
Pool/Spa Water Feature 43.7 1.1 2,200 0.62 1.00 65,567
Artifical Turf (Dog Park) 43.7 0.0 8,700 0.62 1.00 -
Total EAWU: 23,805 287,095
EAWU= Estimated Applied Water Use (gallons per year)
Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) KI= Landscape Coefficient
LA= Landscaped Area (square feet)
0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot)
IE= Irrigation Efficiency= IME X DU (See definication in Appendix E for exmaplne IE percentages) IME= Irrigation Management Efficiency (90%)
DU= Distribution Uniformity of Irrigation Head
KI= Ks x Kc x Kmc
Ks= species factor (range 1.0- 0.9) (see WUCOLS list for values) Project Name: 601 N Brand Blvd, Glendale, CA
WATER EFFICIENT WORK SHEET
Total EAWU = (Eto x KL x LA in Sq.ft. / IE)= Gallons per Year
43.7 23,805
0 Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
Estimated Annual Water Use:
Total MAWA = (Eto x 0.50 x LA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)+(Eto x 1.0 x SLA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)= Gallons per year for LA + SLA Date: November 22, 2022
Hydrozone: Eto: KL LA Sq. Ft. Conversion SLA Sq. Ft. MAWA Landscaped Area- Ground Level 43.7 0.55 23,805 0.62 NA 354,735 MAWA= Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year)
0.50= Evapotraspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF)
1.0= ETAF for Sprcial Landscaped Area
LA= Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet)
0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot)
0.3= the additional ET adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Area (1.0- 0.7= 0.3) SLA= Speical Landscape Area (square feet)
Applicant to fill in boxes below:
Eto (Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C inches per year) Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) Speical Landscape Area (square feet)
Hydrozone: Eto: KL Sq. Ft. Conversion IE EAWU
Low Water Use Shrubs (Drip) 43.7 0.2 1,935 0.62 0.90 11,650 Medium Water Use Shrubs (Drip) 43.7 0.5 7,410 0.62 0.80 125,479 High Water Use (Rotor) 43.7 0.7 3,560 0.62 0.80 84,398
Pool/Spa Water Feature 43.7 1.1 2,200 0.62 1.00 65,567
Artifical Turf (Dog Park) 43.7 0.0 8,700 0.62 1.00 -
Total EAWU: 23,805 287,095
EAWU= Estimated Applied Water Use (gallons per year)
Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) KI= Landscape Coefficient
LA= Landscaped Area (square feet)
0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot)
IE= Irrigation Efficiency= IME X DU (See definication in Appendix E for exmaplne IE percentages) IME= Irrigation Management Efficiency (90%)
DU= Distribution Uniformity of Irrigation Head
KI= Ks x Kc x Kmc
Ks= species factor (range 1.0- 0.9) (see WUCOLS list for values) Kd= density factor (range 0.5- 1.3) (see WUCOLS list for density value) Kmc= microclimatic factor (range 0.5- 1.4) (see WUCOLS) Table A- PF (Plant Factor)
Cool Season Turf= 0.8
Warm Season Turf= 0.7
High Water Use Plants= 0.7 (can be between 0.7-0.9)
Moderate Water Use Plants= 0.5 (can be between 0.4-0.6) Low Water Use Plants= 0.2 (can be between 0.1-0.3)
Very Low Water Use Plants= 0.1
IE (Irrigation Efficiency)- Appendix E
Pop-up Stream Rotor= 0.80
Rotor Head= 0.80
Microspray= 0.90
Bubblers= 0.90
Project Name: 601 N Brand Blvd, Glendale, CA
WATER EFFICIENT WORK SHEET
Total EAWU = (Eto x KL x LA in Sq.ft. / IE)= Gallons per Year
43.7 23,805
0 Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
Estimated Annual Water Use:
Total MAWA = (Eto x 0.50 x LA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)+(Eto x 1.0 x SLA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)= Gallons per year for LA + SLA Date: November 22, 2022
434 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-1
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - P L A Z A
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT 435 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-2
L I G H T I N G P L A N - P L A Z A
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 3
GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING PLAN
AMENITY
SPACE 5000sf
DOWNLIGHTS
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CANOPY
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN POLE
DOWNLIGHTS
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CANOPY
LINEAR ART WORK
BACKLIGHTING
MARKER LIGHT
DOWNLIGHT
COVE
DOWNLIGHTS
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CANOPY
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN POLE
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN POLE
DOWNLIGHTS
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CANOPY
LUMINARE LEGEND
DIMMABLE LED ADJUSTABLE
FLOOD LIGHT - SHRUBS
DIMMABLE LED SURFACE
MOUNTED DOWNLIGHT
DIMMABLE LED COLOR
CHANGING LIGHT
DIMMABLE LED LOW-LEVEL
LINEAR LUMINAIRE
DIMMABLE LED ADJUSTABLE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN POLE
TREE UPLIGHT
DIMMABLE LED UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
DIMMABLE LED STAIR
LIGHTING LUMINAIRE
1 2
3 5
5 4
6 436 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-3
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - P O D I U M L E V E L
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 4
GLENDALE PODIUM LIGHTING CONCEPT
SHRUBS AND LANDSCAPE OPEN STRUCTURE POOL
DOG PARK BENCH LIGHTING PALM TREE LIGHTING SOFFIT LIGHTING 1 MARKER LIGHTS 3 4
5 6 7 8
2 437 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-4
L I G H T I N G P L A N - P O D I U M L E V E L
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 5
GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING PLAN
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 POOL
20'x75'
WEST
LOUNGE
EAST
LOUNGE
CO-WORKING BRIDGE
FITNESS
CENTER 5000sf
4570sf
AMENITY
SPACE 5000sf
OPEN
TO
BELOW
DOWNLIGHTS
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIG
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CA
LINEAR ART WORK
BACKLIGHTING
MARKER LIGHT
LUMINARE LEGEND
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN POLE
DOWNLIGHTS
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CANOPY
DOWNLIGHTS
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
DOWNLIGHTS FEATURE CANOPY
LINEAR ART WORK
BACKLIGHTING
MARKER LIGHT
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
LINEAR ART WORK
BACKLIGHTING
MARKER LIGHT
DOWNLIGHT
COVE
DIMMABLE LED PIXEL LIGHT
DIMMABLE LED DOWNLIGHT
DIMMABLE LED LOW WALL
LIGHTING AT DOG PARK
DIMMABLE LED POOL
LIGHT
DIMMABLE LED LOW-LEVEL
LINEAR LUMINARE
DIMMABLE LED ART WORK
BACK LIGHTING
DIMMABLE LED UNDERBENCH LIGHTINGDIMMABLE LED MARKER
LIGHT
DIMMABLE LED ADJUSTABLE
FLOOD LIGHT - SHRUBS
DIMMABLE LED ADJUSTABLE
TREE UPLIGHT
1 1
7 2
2 4
5 5
3 6
2 3
3 3
438 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-5
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - I N T E R I O R A M E N I T I E S ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 6
INTERIOR AMENITIES LIGHTING CONCEPT
FITNESS CENTER
LOUNGE AND AMENITY SPACE
439 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-6
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - R E C E P T I O N A N D E L E V A T O R L O B B Y ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 7 RECEPTION AND ELEVATOR LIGHTING CONCEPTS PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD 2022-11-08 pg. 00
SCHEMATIC DESIGN - STAGE I RECEPTION AND ELEVATOR LIGHTING CONCEPTS
RECEPTION AREA ELEVATOR LOBBY
Lighting in the elevator lobbies consist of an indirect LED cove at the perimeter, with recessed LED downlights, this move is replicated on every floor for visual continuity through the facade niches from the exterior, particularly from the North.
Reception area will be lit with recessed LED downlights, integrated LED linear lights into the reception desk millwork, and decorative pendants over the reception desk.
PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
SCHEMATIC DESIGN - STAGE I RECEPTION AND ELEVATOR LIGHTING CONCEPTS
RECEPTION AREA ELEVATOR LOBBY
Lighting in the elevator lobbies consist of an indirect LED cove at the perimeter, with recessed LED downlights, this move is replicated on every floor for visual continuity through the facade niches from the exterior, particularly from the North.
Reception area will be lit with recessed LED downlights, integrated LED linear lights into the reception desk millwork, and decorative pendants over the reception desk.
RECEPTION AREA ELEVATOR LOBBY
RECEPTION AREA WILL BE LIT USING RECESSED LED DOWNLIGHTS, INTEGRATED LED LINEAR LIGHTS INTO THE RECEPTION DESK MILLWORK, AND DECORATIVE PENDANTS OVER THE RECEPTION DESK.
LIGHTING IN THE ELEVATOR LOBBIES CONSIST OF AN INDIRECT LED COVE AT THE PERIMETER, WITH
RECESSED LED DOWNLIGHTS, THIS MOVE IS REPLICATED ON EVERY FLOOR FOR VISUAL CONTINUITY THROUGH THE FACADE NICHES FROM THE EXTERIOR, PARTICULARLY FROM THE NORTH. 440 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-7
L I G H T I N G P L A N - E L E V A T O R
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 8 ELEVATOR LIGHTING PLAN PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
MATIC DESIGN - STAGE I ELEVATOR LIGHTING PLAN
Dimmable LED cove light in architectural cove
Dimmable LED ambient downlight with lens and trim
Decorative wall sconces and/or illuminated features are optional and pending interior design direction.
Lighting Criteria: 10 footcandles at the elevator door thresholds Luminaire Legend
TYPICAL ELEVATOR LIGHTING PLAN
LUMINARE LEGEND
DIMMABLE LED COVE LIGHT IN ARCHITECTURAL COVE
DIMMABLE LED AMBIENT DOWNLIGHT WITH LENS AND TRIM
1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR
1BR 1BR
P1
P2
P3
P/S
E
DECORATIVE WALL SCONCES AND/OR ILLUMINATED FEATURES ARE OPTIONAL AND PENDING INTERIOR DESIGN
DIRECTION
LIGHTING CRITERIA: 10 FOOTCANDLES AT THE ELEVATOR DOOR THRESHOLDS 441 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-8
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - P O R T E C O C H E R E A N D L O B B Y ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 9
PORTE COCHERE AND LOBBY LIGHTING CONCEPT
PORTE COCHERE AND LOBBY
THE PORTE COCHERE AND THE MAIN LOBBIES WILL BE LIT WITH INDIRECT LINEAR FIXTURES HIGHLIGHTING THE CONCAVE AND GIVING CONTRAST TO THE CEILING. THIS SCHEME PROVIDES VISUAL CONTINUITY WITH THE FEATURED CEILING AND UNIFYING THE PORTE COCHERE AND THE WEST & EAST LOBBIES. ADDITIONAL DOWNLIGHTS WILL BE ADDED ON THE SOFFIT TO ADD MORE GENERAL ILLUMINATION.
442 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-9
L I G H T I N G P L A N - P O R T E C O C H E R E A N D L O B B Y ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 10 P1
P2
P1
P2
LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
LEASING
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
FCC
DOM
WATE
PUMP
MPOE BFP
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
POOL ABOVE
CLR HT. 14' MIN.
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
BIKE
SHOP
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
P1
P2
P1
P2
LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
LEASING
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
FCC
DOM
WATE
PUMP
MPOE BFP
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
POOL ABOVE
CLR HT. 14' MIN.
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
BIKE
SHOP
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
ACE
0sf
TE
4 PORTE
COCHERE
LUMINARE LEGEND
PORTE COCHERE AND LOBBY LIGHTING PLAN
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
LINEAR ART WORK
BACKLIGHTING
MARKER LIGHT
DOWNLIGHT
COVE
UNDERBENCH LIGHTING
ADJUSTABLE LED FLOODLIGHTS
TREE UPLIGHTS
INGOUND STAIR UPLIGHTS
LOW LEVEL LINEAR LIGHT
LINEAR ART WORK
BACKLIGHTING
MARKER LIGHT
DOWNLIGHT
COVE
DIMMABLE LED RECESSED
DOWNLIGHT
DIMMABLE LED LINEAR FIXTURE
- CONCAVE GLOW
443 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-10
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - R O O F S O F F I T
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 11
ROOF SOFFIT LIGHTING CONCEPT
ROOF SOFFIT
444 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-11
L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T - P A R K I N G G A R A G E ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 12 PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
PARKING GARAGE
TRANSITIONAL TUNNEL
PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
PARKING GARAGE
TRANSITIONAL TUNNEL
PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
PARKING GARAGE
TRANSITIONAL TUNNEL
PARKING GARAGE
TRANSITIONAL TUNNEL
PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING CONCEPTS 445 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-12
L I G H T I N G P L A N - P A R K I N G G A R A G E A T G R O U N D L E V E L ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 13 P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
GENERATOR
EMERG.
ELEC.
RM. LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
LEASING
DOCK
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
STAGING STAGING
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
STAGING
FCC
RESTAURANT
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS STAGING
MPOE BFP
5610sf
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
POOL ABOVE
CLR HT. 14' MIN.
EXTG. DOCK TO
REMAIN
DOCK
PLAZA REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
BIKE
SHOP
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 OPEN
TO
ABOVE
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM RESIDENTS'
PARK
ENTRY
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
GENERATOR
EMERG.
ELEC.
RM. LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
LEASING
DOCK
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
STAGING STAGING
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
STAGING
FCC
RESTAURANT
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS STAGING
MPOE BFP
5610sf
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
POOL ABOVE
CLR HT. 14' MIN.
EXTG. DOCK TO
REMAIN
DOCK
PLAZA REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
BIKE
SHOP
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM RESIDENTS'
PARK
ENTRY
P1
P2
P3
P/S ELEC.
TERRACE
4600sf
AMENITY
P1
P2
P3
P/S ELEC.
TERRACE
4600sf
AMENITY
PORTE
COCHERE
P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P1
P1
LUMINARE LEGEND
PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING PLAN : LEVEL 1
Dimmable, wet rated, continuous-run linear lensed LED luminaire LEVEL 1 PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING PLAN
PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
Luminaire Legend
Type P1
DOCK
EXISTING PARKING GARAGE
OFFICE BUILDING
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
GENERATOR
EMERG.
ELEC.
RM. LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
LEASING
DOCK
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
STAGING STAGING
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
STAGING
FCC
RESTAURANT
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS STAGING
MPOE BFP
5610sf
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
POOL ABOVE
CLR HT. 14' MIN.
EXTG. DOCK TO
REMAIN
DOCK
PLAZA REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
BIKE
SHOP
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 OPEN
TO
ABOVE
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM RESIDENTS'
PARK
ENTRY
P/S P2
ELEC.
TERRACE
4600sf
AMENITY
P2 P/S ELEC.
TERRACE
4600sf
AMENITY
P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
Surface mounted, dimmable, ambient LED, glare-control, wet rated, garage luminaire Type P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P1
P1
TYPE P1 - SURFACE MOUNTED, DIMMABLE, AMBIENT LED, GLARE-CONTROL, WET RATED, GARAGE LUMINAIRE TYPE P2 - DIMMABLE, WET RATED, CONTINUOUS-RUN LINEAR LENSED LED LUMINAIRE 446 of 895
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 29, 2022 L-13 L I G H T I N G P L A N - P A R K I N G G A R A G E A T B 1 - B 4 ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 2
LOW LEVEL LIGHTING
OPEN STRUCTURE LIGHTING
TREE UPLIGHTING SHRUBS LIGHTING BLEACHERS LIGHTING
BENCH LIGHTING
4 6
1 2 3
5 GLENDALE LIVING ROOM LIGHTING CONCEPT
ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOVEMBER 18, 2022 14 ONNI 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD | DESIGN UPDATE | GLENDALE, CA NOV 09, 2022 2 B1-B4
P1
P2
P3
P/S ELEC.
TERRACE
4600sf
AMENITY
P1
P2
P3
P/S ELEC.
0 10 50
TERRACE
4600sf
AMENITY
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
1 A
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
B
C
10 P1
P1
P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
P1
P1
P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
LUMINARE LEGEND
PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING PLAN : B1 - B4
Dimmable, wet rated, continuous-run linear lensed LED luminaire LEVEL 1 PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING PLAN
PROJECT 601 N BRAND BOULEVARD
2022-11-08 pg. 00
Luminaire Legend
Type P1
DOCK
EXISTING PARKING GARAGE
OFFICE BUILDING
P1
P2
P3
P/S
P1
P2
P3
P/S
GENERATOR
EMERG.
ELEC.
RM. LOBBY
CONCIERGE
WC
MAIL
PACKAGE
RM.
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRANSFORMER
VAULT
FCC BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
LEASING
DOCK
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
POOL
EQUIP.
LOBBY
1890sf
WC
STAGING STAGING
CONCIERGE
DOCK MAIL PACKAGE
RM.
WC
TRASH &
RECYCLING
RM.
STAGING
FCC
RESTAURANT
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS
DOM.
WATER
PUMPS STAGING
MPOE BFP
5610sf
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
ENTRY TO (E)
GARAGE
POOL ABOVE
CLR HT. 14' MIN.
EXTG. DOCK TO
REMAIN
DOCK
PLAZA REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
1470sf
BICYCLE
STORAGE
(28)
BIKE
SHOP
A
B
C
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
MAIN
ELECTRICAL
ROOM RESIDENTS'
PARK
ENTRY
P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
P1 P1 P1
Surface mounted, dimmable, ambient LED, glare-control, wet rated, garage luminaire Type P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P1
P1
TYPE P1 - SURFACE MOUNTED, DIMMABLE, AMBIENT LED, GLARE-CONTROL, WET RATED, GARAGE LUMINAIRE 447 of 895
448 of 895
449 of 895
450 of 895
451 of 895
9b
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Public Hearing on the Appeal of the Decision of the Director of Public Works Granting Encroachment Permit No. EP-823 for the Installation of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities in the Public Right of Way located in front of 1544 W.
Kenneth Road
1. Motion DENYING the appeal and upholding the decision of the Director of Public Works granting Encroachment Permit No. EP-823.
2. Motion GRANTING the appeal, reversing the decision of the Director of Public Works, and continuing the matter until November 28, 2023, for the City Attorney to prepare findings consistent with Council direction.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for November 7, 2023 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is an appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Patrick Masihi, appealing the decision of the Director of Public Works granting Encroachment Permit No. EP-823 (“EP-823”) for the installation of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities in front of 1544 W. Kenneth Road. 452 of 895
2 b 9
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council DENY the appeal of the decision of the Director of Public Works granting EP-823 for the installation of small cell wireless telecommunication (“Small Cell”) facilities in the public right-of-way (“ROW”) located in front of 1544 W. Kenneth Road and UPHOLD the decision of the Director of Public Works Granting Encroachment Permit No. EP-823.
ANALYSIS
1. On February 21, 2023, ExteNet Systems, LLC (“ExteNet”), a company that is licensed by the State of California Public Utilities Commission, applied for an Encroachment Permit (EP) to install 5G small cell wireless telecommunication (Small Cell) facilities within City’s public right-of-way located in front of 1544 W.
Kenneth Road. ExteNet’s application for EP-823 is attached as Exhibit 1.
2. On July 17, 2023, a public hearing was held, in accordance with City’s municipal code relating to and governing the application for such Small Cell facility encroachment permits. Minutes from the July 17, 2023 public hearing are attached as Exhibit 2.
3. On August 11, 2023, the Director of Public Works granted EP-823 to ExteNet for the proposed Project. The Director’s correspondence granting EP-823 is attached as Exhibit 3.
4. On August 24, 2023, the instant appeal was filed challenging the granting of EP823.
ExteNet’s proposed project in accordance with EP-823 (“Project”) is comprised of the following:
• Removal & replacement of existing 25'-0" Above Ground Level (AGL) round metal street light pole & foundation with new 25'-0" AGL round metal street light pole (CA002_Glendale_137) & foundation 5'-0" east of original location • New 3'-6" x 8'-0" reinforced foundation 5'-0" east of original location. • Three new 16.2" x 8.1" x 6.1" panel antennas with integrated Remote Radio Units (RRU) within concealment shroud.
• 11.50" x 8.0" x 3.313" meter can locate within round metal street light pole. • 10.43" x 9.38" x 5.06" AC disconnect/load center with integrated surge protection within new round metal street light pole.
• One 24" x 36" x 18" pull box for underground fiber infrastructure connection (under separate permit).
• Proposed facility will not emit any sound.
• Two 17" x 30" x 24" pull box for service power connection; and • Proposed facility will not emit any sound.
453 of 895
3 b 9
On July 17, 2023 the Public Works Department held a properly noticed public hearing regarding the consideration of EP-823 as well as 6 other Small Cell facilities encroachment permit applications. A total of three individuals spoke during the public hearing. A summary of the public speaker comments from the July 17, 2023 hearing is attached as Exhibit 2. On August 11, 2023, the Director of Public Works granted EP-823 to Extenet for the proposed Project, as well as the permits for the other Small Cell facilities.
The Appeal:
On August 24, 2023 Mr. Patrick Masihi (“Appellant”) filed an appeal appealing the decision of the Director of Public Works granting EP-823 for the proposed Project.
Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC) Section 12.08.037(K)(2) requires that appeals from the decision of the Director of Public Works relating to encroachment permits for wireless telecommunications facilities in the public right-of-way in non-preferred zones be heard by the City Council. The Appellant’s appeal is attached to this report as Exhibit 4.
Appellant contends that the proposed radio frequency (“RF”) emissions from the proposed facility will adversely impact the health and safety of residents and decrease property values.
Appellant also contends that the proposed location is near a private childcare facility and that Verizon has not presented the city with a study on the health and safety of 5G technology in the past 15-20 years.
Appellant seeks an alternate location for the proposed facility.
Public Notice of the Appeal Hearing:
The GMC requires public notice for appeal to the City Council pursuant to GMC Chapter
2.88. Notice of this appeal hearing has been given, in accordance with GMC Section
2.88.070, by publishing notice once in Glendale Independent at least 10 days before the appeal hearing; by providing mailed notice, at least 10 days prior to the appeal hearing date, to all persons within a radius of 500 feet of the property which is the subject of the proposed appeal; and by posting notice of this hearing at the property subject to the proposed appeal at least 10 days prior to the appeal hearing date. In addition, Public Works staff posted the public hearing notice on the city’s website under the Public Works Department page. In the case of this appeal, the proper public notices have been given in compliance with the GMC.
City Council Review:
GMC Section 2.88.090 governs the appeal proceedings at issue. Pursuant to GMC
2.88.090, the City Council’s review of this appeal shall be de novo, meaning the City Council shall make an independent re-examination of the matter. The Appellant has the 454 of 895
4 b 9
burden of proof to present evidence to demonstrate that the Director of Public Works erred in granting the Encroachment Permit for the Project.
The City Council, after considering all evidence, written and oral, may decide to either uphold the decision of the Director of Public Works issuing the Encroachment Permit for the Project or reverse the decision of the Director of Public Works and deny the Encroachment Permit issued for the Project. The decision of the City Council will be the city’s final decision.
Independent Expert Review:
The city’s consultant Telecom Law Firm, P.C. (TLF), who assists the Public Works Department with the review of wireless facilities applications, has reviewed the applications for EP-823 for completeness and compliance with all requirements of the GMC, as well as to ensure that the applicant has met all federal RF safety requirements.
The TLF Memo is attached hereto as Exhibit 5.
Additionally, during the public hearing, ExteNet’s expert responded to questions and concerns relating to RF safety.
The Project is in compliance with Glendale Municipal Code Section 12.08.037. All facilities to be constructed or placed in the public right-of-way require Encroachment Permits. GMC Section 12.08.037 regulates wireless transmission facilities, inclusive of small cell attachments, proposed in the public right-of- way.
The TLF Memo did not consider or discuss property values. In preparation for this appeal hearing, staff raised this issue with TLF’s report author, Dr. Kramer, who reviewed the appeal materials provided by the Appellant. He reports that courts most often want expert testimony on the question from qualified real estate appraisers, not merely real estate agents, and that the appraisers have direct and on-point experience appraising the impact of actual cell sites. There is no such qualified expert and reliable evidence of any expected property value diminution provided in the instant appeal.
The requirements of GMC 12.08.037 are addressed below:
1. All notification requirements have been met by mailed notice of the proposed Project, as well as the notice of public hearing, sent to properties within a 500 ft. radius and by posting the location of the Project with said notice as required by GMC Section 12.08.037(H)(1).
2. The proposed facility meets the provisions of GMC Section 12.08.037, which are addressed in this Council Report and TLF’s Memo (Exhibit 5 mentioned above).
3. The proposed facility will not interfere with the use of the public right-of-way and existing improvements and utilities thereon.
455 of 895
5 b 9
4. The proposed facility will not physically or visually interfere with vehicular, bicycle, and/or pedestrian use of streets, intersections, bicycle lanes, driveways, sidewalks, and/or walkways.
5. The proposed facility will comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act.
6. To the maximum extent reasonably feasible, the proposed facility has been designed to blend with the surrounding area and the facility is appropriately designed for the specific site.
7. ExteNet has provided three ‘alternative’ locations for the proposed small cell site.
Alternative Site 1 is at the corner of Justin Avenue and Kenneth Road (nearest address:
1555 Kenneth Road). Extenet ruled out this alternative because of an immediately adjacent mature tree that would block a portion of the proposed radio signals.
Alternative Site 2 is at the corner of Ruberta Avenue and Kenneth Road (nearest address: 1523 Kenneth Road). ExteNet also ruled out this alternative because of immediately adjacent mature trees that would block a portion of the proposed radio signals. Alternative Site 3 is in front of 1265 Justin Avenue. Extenet ruled out this location asserting that a small cell at this location will not meet the coverage objectives.
In the case of this site, the city does not consider it to be a true alternative because ExteNet asserts this ‘alternative’ would not be a viable candidate given its location.
8. The proposed facility is not a high visibility facility, but rather a low visibility design for the proposed facility. The proposed Project is camouflaged wireless facility mounted atop of a streetlight.
9. That specific physical or technical factors make infeasible the use of co-location upon a preexisting antenna support structure or preexisting building or structure.
10. That there is a significant gap in the existing wireless service that the proposed facility is intended to close. The application and propagation maps submitted by ExteNet assert a significant gap and poor data rates by Verizon, for whom ExteNet is constructing this site.
State or local agencies are prohibited from establishing statutes, regulations, or local requirements which “may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.” 47 USC Section 253(a). The regulatory authority of municipalities is limited to time/place/manner – e.g. traffic safety, aesthetics, pole load, noise.
The FCC has exclusive jurisdiction over RF safety standards. “No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the 456 of 895
6 b 9
Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” 47 USC Section 332(c)(7)(iv).
Municipalities are allowed to request that an applicant provide proof of compliance with FCC RF safety standards, as well as antenna height standards adopted by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”).
As set forth in the city’s independent expert consultant Memo, the proposed Project meets all requirements for application completeness and compliance with the federally- required RF safety rules.
Based on the foregoing, staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There will be minimal fiscal impact as a result of the denial or grant of the appeal. If the appeal is granted, the city will not collect the $200 annual attachment fee and the other related cost-based fees. Conversely, if the appeal is denied, the revenue to the city from the attachment will be minimal.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This Project falls within the Class 3 categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. (14 Cal. Code of Regulations, Section 15303). Class 3 exempt projects consist of “construction and location of limited numbers of new small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. Class 3 examples include, but are not limited to, water main, sewage, electrical, gas and other utility extension, including street improvements of reasonable length to serve such construction. (Section 15303(d)).
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council may uphold the decision of the Director of Public Works granting EP-823.
Alternative 2: The City Council may reverse the decision of the Director of Public Works granting EP-823.
Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative. 457 of 895
7 b 9
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Yazdan T. Emrani, P.E., Director of Public Works
Prepared by:
Yazdan T. Emrani, P.E., Director of Public Works
Sarkis Oganesyan, Deputy Director of Public Works
Dorine Martirosian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Encroachment Permit Application Packet by ExteNet.
Exhibit 2 – Summary of Minutes of Public Speaker Comments – July 17, 2023.
Exhibit 3 – August 11, 2023, Director of Public Works correspondence granting the Encroachment Permit.
Exhibit 4 – Appeal filed by Appellant Patrick Masihi.
Exhibit 5 – Report of Dr. Jonathan L. Kramer, Telecom Law Firm, P.C., the City’s independent expert.
458 of 895
1 M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that upon review and consideration of all documents, material and exhibits relative to the appeal of the decision of the Direction of Public Works granting Encroachment Permit No. EP823 for the attachment of wireless transmission facilities to the street light pole located in the public right-of-way adjacent to 1544 W. Kenneth Road (EP-823), and after having conducted a public hearing on the appeal on November 7, 2023, pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC), and receiving testimony, the City Council, based upon all of the evidence in the record hereby DENIES the appeal and SUSTAINS the decision of the Director of Public Works granting EP-823, for all of the reasons outlined in the Report dated November 7, 2023 by the Director of Public Works (Report), including any attachment thereto and any other evidence presented at the hearing, including any additional Council comments at the hearing, and the following findings:
1. The proposed facility meets the provisions of GMC Section 12.08.03 addressed in the November Council Report.
2. The proposed facility will not interfere with the use of the public right-of-way and existing improvements and utilities thereon, as the proposed facility will install a low-profile and low-power small cell wireless facility and will include a meter pedestal and pull box on or adjacent to a power pole.
3. The proposed facility will not physically or visually interfere with vehicular, bicycle, and/or pedestrian use of streets, intersections, bicycle lanes, driveways, sidewalks, and/or walkways as the proposed facility is a low-profile small cell facility with a meter pedestal and pull box on or adjacent to a power pole. 459 of 895
2 4. The proposed facility will comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and will meet all required ADA standards.
5. To the maximum extent reasonably feasible, the proposed facility has been designed to blend with the surrounding area and the facility is appropriately designed for the specific site.
6. The Applicant has provided three ‘alternative’ locations for the proposed small cell site as identified in the Report, none of which meet the coverage objectives.
7. The proposed facility is not a high visibility facility, but rather a low visibility design. The proposed facility is a camouflaged wireless facility mounted atop of a streetlight.
8. Specific physical or technical factors, including but not limited to the proposed facility being located on a street light in the public right-of-way with limited available space, make infeasible the use of or co-location upon a preexisting antenna support structure or preexisting building or structure.
9. There is a significant gap in the existing wireless service that the proposed facility is intended to close. The application and propagation map submitted by Applicant assert a significant gap and poor data rates by Applicant carrier who will be occupying the proposed site.
10. The proposed facility meets all requirements for application completeness and compliance with the federally-required radioactive frequency (RF) safety rules as Applicant has included in its submittal appropriate plans, site survey propagation maps and certification of RF compliance in accordance with FCC standards which have been reviewed by City staff and City’s technical expert consultant.
11. The FCC has exclusive jurisdiction over RF safety standards and Applicant has demonstrated that it has met said standards by submitting certification of RF compliance with FCC standards.
12. The Appellant has not submitted expert testimony from qualified real estate appraisers demonstrating that the impact of the proposed facility will result in decreased property values.
13. The Appellant has not provided evidence that the approval of the proposed facility results in discrimination against Armenian American property owners in light of the permit application of another facility in front of Lutheran Church being withdrawn, since the withdrawal of the application for the facility in front of the Lutheran Church was by the applicant itself and not the City. 460 of 895
3 Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
461 of 895
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that upon review and consideration of all documents, material and exhibits relative to the appeal of the decision of the Direction of Public Works granting Encroachment Permit No. EP823 for the attachment of wireless transmission facilities to the street light pole located in the public right-of-way adjacent to 1544 W. Kenneth Road (EP-823), and after having conducted a public hearing on the appeal on November 7, 2023, pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC), and receiving testimony, the City Council, based upon all of the evidence in the record hereby GRANTS the appeal, REVERSES the decision of the Director of Public Works, and continues the matter until November 28, 2023 for the City Attorney to prepare findings consistent with Council Decision.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
462 of 895
EXHIBIT 1
463 of 895
Non-Refundable
Fee: $1903.00
CITY OF GLENDALE
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT
Encroachment Permit No. EP-823
Date: 01/31/2023 Receipt No. of Non-Refundable Permit Fee:
Applicant: Extenet Systems, LLC.
Address: 300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502 Phone: 682-351-3335
Location of Encroachment ____ ____________________________________________ FRONT OF 1544 W KENNETH RD. (APN: 5622-027-018) Name and Address of owner of adjacent real property benefited by the encroachment:
Public Right of Way
34° 10' 26.48" N 118° 16' 57.06" W
Legal Description of adjacent real property:
TRACT NO 4203 SE 55 FT OF NE 130 FT OF LOT 42
Applicant shall provide 1 electronic copy of plan of the proposed encroachment.
Specific description and justification for encroachment:
Please see attached sheet for detailed scope of work.
This site will be a part of Verizon's 5G network.
Applicant agrees to satisfy all conditions attached hereto and to remove said structure upon revocation of this permit at no cost to the City of Glendale.
Approved:
Yazdan T. Emrani, P. E.
Director of Public Works
Date
464 of 895
City of Glendale, CA Receipt
Public Works Department
633 E. Broadway
Room 209
Glendale, CA 91206
818-548-3945