the project may adversely affect a historic resource. (Pub. Res. Code § 21084.1, 14 Cal.Code Regs. 15300.2(f).) When there is evidence that a proposed building would adversely affect an historic district, this creates a “fair argument” of a significant adverse impact under CEQA. (Georgetown Pres. Soc'y v. Cnty. of El Dorado (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 358, 376; see also, Newtown Preservation Society v. County of El Dorado (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 771, 781-782.) Since the City has made a determination based on substantial evidence that the Project will adversely affect a historic resource, the City may not exempt the Project from CEQA review.
The developer has argued that a CEQA exemption is required under the Housing Accountability Act (“HAA”), and the Density Bonus Law (“DBL”). This argument ignores the plain language of the law. The Density Bonus Law (“DBL”) does not exempt the Project from CEQA review. The court of appeal has held that the City must comply both with CEQA and the DBL. (Wollmer v City of Berkeley (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1329, 1349.) The HAA, also does not exempt projects from CEQA. (Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1245, 1250, 1261-62, citing Gov.Code, § 65589.5, subd. (e) [“Nothing in this section shall be construed ... to relieve the local agency from ... complying with the [CEQA]”.) The HAA “pegs its applicability to the approval, denial or conditional approval of a ‘housing development project’ [citations], which, as previously noted, can occur only after the EIR is certified.” (Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol, supra, 179 Cal.App.4th at 1262.)
In Schellinger Brothers, the court held that the timelines set forth in the HAA do not start to run until after CEQA review is completed. The court recognized that it is not possible to comply with both the expedited timelines of the HAA and CEQA. Therefore, the HAA timelines not to start to run until after the completion of CEQA review. In Schellinger, a developer proposed a 175 unit residential project with 20% of the units being affordable.
The developer sued the city after the city had taken almost 10 years to consider the project and held countless meetings. The city council voted that a recirculated EIR was required to address issues not analyzed in the now old EIR, including the discovery of a new protected species on the project site. The developer sued the city stating that the city violated the time requirements of the Housing Accountability Act (HAA).
The Court of Appeal rejected this argument, and held that the HAA has a “savings clause” fully preserving the city’s authority under CEQA. The court held that therefore, the city may take as long as is necessary to complete CEQA review, and the HAA timelines do not even begin until after CEQA review is completed. The court stated:
the Housing Accountability Act has no provision automatically approving EIRs if local action is not completed within a specified period… there is no indication the Legislature meant to modify or accelerate CEQA's procedures… Again, the indications are to the contrary. The Housing Accountability Act expressly states that “Nothing in this section shall be construed ... to relieve the local agency from making one or more of the findings required pursuant to Section 21081... or otherwise February 3, 2025
Comment on 1303-1315 North Central Avenue Project (Case No. PAPP-004151-2024), February 5, 2025 City Council Agenda Item 9.a
complying with the California Environmental Quality Act....” (Gov.Code, § 65589.5, subd. (e).) But it specifically pegs its applicability to the approval, denial or conditional approval of a “housing development project” (id., subds. (d)(3), (5)(A), (h)(5)(A), (i), (k), (l )), which, as previously noted, can occur only after the EIR is certified. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15090(a).) That obviously has not occurred here.
The Shellinger case makes clear that the City retains its full powers under CEQA despite the HAA, and that the proposed project may not be approved until after CEQA review and any findings are completed.
Thank you for considering our comments.
Sincerely,
Richard Drury
Lozeau Drury LLP
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes- 1303-1315 North Central Avenue, EIR Appeal PAPP-004151-2024, City Council Meeting February 4, 2025
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:19:43 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
F Smith letter to CC 2 3 25.pdf
Attachment 1- DPR GGH.pdf
Attachment 2- CV FS 2025.pdf
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Francesca Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 5:35 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Platt, Jay <[email protected]>; Andrew Salimian <[email protected]>; Pruett, Cassandra <[email protected]>; Susan Brandt- Hawley <[email protected]>
Cc: The Glendale Historical Society <[email protected]> Subject: Glendale Garden Homes- 1303-1315 North Central Avenue, EIR Appeal PAPP-004151-2024, City Council Meeting February 4, 2025
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Hi all,
Please find my letter attached regarding the above-referenced project, with two attachments appended to this message (pdf files). It requests that you deny the project appeal.
Kindly ensure that all three of the attachments are received and are included in the project Administrative Record.
Best wishes,
Francesca Smith
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 3CS; 5S3
Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier: 1303-1315 North Central Avenue
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted
*a. County Los Angeles
*b. USGS 7.5’ Quad Burbank Date: updated 1994
* c. Address 1303-1315 North Central Avenue City Glendale Zip 91202-1837 *d. UTM: Zone: ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
* e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Identification Number 5633-006-014 *P3a. Description:
The subject property Glendale Garden Homes is a garden apartment complex comprised of three, two-story multi-family, residential buildings. The buildings are 1303, 1311 and 1315 North Central Avenue, hereafter Buildings A, B and C, with a carport a pool and cabana (refer to Figure 1 on page 3). The buildings are Mid-Century Modern in architectural style and are outstanding local examples of the Garden Apartment subtype. Buildings B and C are each irregular U shapes in plan, arranged north-south in approximate mirror images of one another, backing up to a shared, central axis. Building A has a slightly shorter leg facing Central Avenue, with three projecting patios (at ground floor) and porches (second floor) which face Central Avenue. Most of the sets of stacked patios and covered porches face the interior garden courtyards, an arrangement which is in keeping with the Garden Apartment typology. The single, south-facing, patio-porch pair at the south end of Building A is deeply cloaked by mature trees (refer to P5a). Building C on the south end of the property is configured in an irregular C plan and runs roughly east-west.
The shared spaces between buildings are fully landscaped with various groups of mature trees, drifts of shrubs and assorted groundcover, all of which create generous, interconnected, interior garden courtyard areas. Inside of the property linked, paved footpaths form an unequal E arrangement, connecting the buildings and leading to the 37 grouped entrances which serve anywhere between one to four units each. The main pedestrian entrance to the Glendale Garden Homes complex is between Buildings A and B from Central Avenue.
All three of the Glendale Garden Homes buildings are primarily clad in sand-finished stucco. The upper floors have a variety of finish materials, ranging from painted, wide redwood siding, which is arranged vertically, to wide, painted, also redwood, beveled shiplap siding at porches and other second floor bays (Figure 2, page 4). Continuation Sheet, page 3 *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP3. Multiple family property *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other *P5b. Photo: (view and date)
View northeast of Buildings A
(foreground) and B (right-hand
side), August 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: historic
1957, building permits
*P8. Recorded by:
*P7. Owner and Address:
Central BWB, LLC
14140 Moorpark St #400
Sherman Oaks CA 91423
*P8. Recorded by:
Francesca Smith for
saveglendalegardens.org
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 28, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:
Smith, F. Evaluation of Historic Significance for Glendale Garden Homes- 1303-1315 North Central Avenue, Glendale. 2025. *Attachments: None Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (list)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.)
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # Glendale Garden Homes
B1. Historic name: Glendale Garden Homes and Glendale Garden House B2. Common name: 1303-1315 North Central Avenue B3. Original Use: multi-family garden apartments B4. Present use: same *B5. Architectural Style: Mid-Century Modern, Garden Apartment subtype *B6. Construction History: Buildings A-C built in 1957 (Building Permit or BP #s 53945, 53946 and 53947). Swimming pool, barbecue, Cabana and carports completed 1957 (BP #55243 and 55244). Entrance posts, lamps, gates and wood pergola added 1998 (BP #B10069753). Window in Building A replaced in original opening (post-2019). Fountains replaced with arroyo stone planters (dates unknown).
*B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: mature trees and other landscape plant materials, features and planters, swimming pool, cabana, carports and paved footpaths with brick benches
B9a. Architect: Norwood & DeLonge (designers) b. Builder: Causey & Causey *B10. Significance: Theme Post-World War II Multi-family Residential Development Area Glendale Period of Significance 1957-1989 Property Type Garden Apartments Applicable Criteria 1, 3 The subject property Glendale Garden Homes is a Mid-Century Modern-style, 37-unit garden apartment complex, which was constructed by Causey & Causey in 1957. The assemblage of three interrelated main residential buildings was notably designed by Norwood & Delonge. The original owner was Edgar Northcott Gregg.
Causey & Causey
The general contractors and second owners of Glendale Garden Homes, Causey & Causey, are assumed to have been brothers.
Gill B. Causey was born in 1909 in Tennessee but lived in Glendale as of 1940. Prior to his development career, he was a college graduate, working as a “planning engineer” in the aerospace industry (Census 1940). He was in a partnership with Frank Rhodes, Jr., from 1940 until his death in 1981 (California Contractors State License Board 2023). The “South Glendale Historic Resources Survey” described the pair: “Causey & Rhodes Associates was a major developer and builder in postwar Glendale and other areas of Los Angeles… They later formed a [another] partnership… to develop the Glendale Fashion Center” (2018). That alliance developed an apartment complex at 302-308 North Louise St in 1949 (ibid). It was identified in the South Glendale Historic Resources Survey as a status code 5S3, a locally significant “1940s garden apartment complex” (ibid).
Causey’s wife, June was involved in the firm as well. June Celeste Hillman Causey (1916-2010) was described as “one of the last surviving senior partners of the development company of Causey and Rhodes of Newport Beach and Glendale” (Los Angeles Times 2010). The firm also built “A cluster of four brick clad office buildings… at… Central Avenue and Doran Street. All of these buildings were built between 1950 and 1963…” The 540, 607, 610 and 633 N. Central Avenue Mid-Century modern-style, medical office buildings were all demolished by 2015 and replaced with more than 5,000 residential units (Verdugo Gardens Draft Environmental Impact Report c. 2014). The individual buildings at 540, 607, and 633 North Central Avenue were identified as “a group of four [including 610 N. Central] similarly designed medical buildings” in the reconnaissance-level survey, Historical Resources Technical Report, 2006 prepared for the Glendale Downtown Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report.
(See Continuation Sheet, page 9)
B11.Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References:
Refer to pages 21 and 22
B13. Remarks: none
*B14. Evaluator
*Date of Evaluation:
Sketch Map subject property in red, no scale N
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *P3a. Description: Continued from page 1
Second floors are further differentiated on nearly all sides by simple, stylized, deep string courses, on which some of the steel- framed sliding, casement or jalousie (louvered) windows are set.
Each of the three residential buildings’ fenestration is varied, which fosters a sense of discovery when experiencing the Glendale Garden Homes property. Window openings are several sizes, some are embellished with deep wood surrounds while others are punched, with sharp-edged stucco mold. The steel and aluminum sash window types vary among two-part (a casement with a fixed light), or three-part types (two casements with larger fixed lights). There are metal-framed jalousie windows (with opaque glass), which are primarily used for service areas. Those different exterior window types, with varied exterior window details and finish materials impart subtle animation to the buildings, particularly to the second stories’ relationships among solids-to-voids (walls and openings). Apartment unit living and dining areas open to the outdoors via full-size sliding doors onto protected porches and balconies on the second floors and to enclosed patios on the ground floor. That conceptual blurring of boundaries separating the in- and out-of-doors is among the central attributes of Mid-Century Modern residential architecture. Where unit entrances are grouped, they share inset porches, but are set discrete distances apart, with overpainted, primarily natural wood entrance doors and porches or decks finished in concrete, random slate or in natural brick (Figure 2). Most, but not all unit entrances contain a brick-finished wall which imparts a sense of homecoming to the sequence of arrival at each unit’s front door.
Stairwells are primarily located beneath overhanging roofs but are open to the exterior, further establishing the private-but-open-to- the garden-courts premise of the complex. The stairwells are magnesite (an archaic mixture of magnesium oxide with magnesium chloride) and feature decorative, painted metal railings with monkey-tails and repetitive tapered, comet motifs (Figures 5 and 8).
Details at stair entrances are varied. Some have angled, painted, vertical wood screens which provide privacy while maintaining the complex’s feeling of openness. Polished steel letters and numbers on stand-outs, a high style detail of the era, in a distinctive, Moderne typeface differentiate among buildings and units. Causey & Causey used that detail on many of their properties.
The building designs repeat various elements, all arranged in unexpectedly different ways, which stimulates visual curiosity with every view. The gable-on-hip, deeply overhanging roofs have canted fascia, which repeat the effect of the angled shiplap wood siding and impart an overall appealing, home-like atmosphere to the complex. The distinctive canted fascia, which is a common feature of Mid-Century Modern architecture cleverly disguise internal roof gutters. The roof gables’ apparent masses are further reduced by deep, painted wood, louvers which help establish a horizontal orientation. There are a few instances of low-pitched roofs over single floor areas. Like the other differences among buildings, Buildings A and B each have entirely distinct street-facing exterior details. Figure 1: Annotated, excerpted
Glendale Garden Homes line drawing
plan at left, depicting arrangement and
shapes of buildings, their addresses and
letters (in red) with garden paths,
carports, parking and street names on
either side shown. Source: EP
Associates, “Site Plan” Figure 2, 2004.
Building A differs from the other
buildings in that it contains
ground-level carports at the south
side. The lot slopes downhill to
allow the open carports and “auto
court” use to be somewhat hidden.
Immediately west of Building A,
the separate single-story carport
was built concurrently with the
pool and Cabana. There are two
driveways on the east side, at the
south and north ends of the
property with one on the west side
at the north terminus of Viola
Avenue. The pool and Cabana are
located immediately north of the
west carport.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *P3a. Description: Continued from page 3
Figure 2: View southeast of Building C. Note
the lush landscaping, and simple Mid-Century
design embodied in the varied materials,
overhanging low-pitched roofs with canted
fascia and recessed balcony clad in painted
redwood, thick shiplap siding. The continuous
brick cladding pierces the roof plane to form the
chimney above. Photographs by Francesca
Smith unless otherwise noted, July 2023.
Figure 3: View south from second floor porch
of Building B. Various window types, punched
steel sash casement, louvres set in painted
wood surrounds and full height sliding doors
on the far porch are visible. In addition, the
stucco-finished deep overhanging eaves and
canted fascia can be seen. HVAC compressors
are discretely hidden in ground cover at foot of
photo.
Figure 4: View east with Building A on
right. The elaborate exposed root systems
and trunks of a remarkable row of mature
ficus trees are visible next to the laundry
room entrance. The wrought iron stair
baluster features the decorative comet
motif used throughout the complex with
monkey tail handrails.
Building A has 13 units including one studio. Building B contains 12 units and Building C has 13 units. The subject property parcel is roughly rectangular and is located mid-block but has a small tab that connects to Viola Place, a cul-de-sac, on the west. The street-facing façade of Building A has a simple, painted wood “stringcourse” spanning the second floor at the larger windowsills (Figure 5). The building is roughly three bays wide, with an inset bay on the left (south) side featuring a deep corner patio and shiplap-sided corner porch above. Their design treatments make building corner visually to disappear at the corner, reducing its large mass. The low-sloping, deeply overhanging roof extends to protect that porch, which a typical feature of the complex. Like the other buildings in Glendale Garden Homes, the overhanging gable-on-hip roof has stucco, boxed eaves and angled, thick fascia, representative of the era and style. The main building roofs’ painted wood louvers in the gables also imparts a tropical feeling. The deep eaves conceal internal rain gutters. The three residential buildings each have seven interior, double-flue, brick-finished chimneys. The chimneys all have slightly pronounced crowns in a subtle admission to traditional design language. The brick in the chimneys and random, related bays are “used brick” which reveals understated animation in their differences of colors and textures. Used brick was popular in new residential construction at the time, conveying the patina of age to new buildings.
Like the other buildings in the complex, and emblematic of the style, the façade of Building A is asymmetrical, with a plain rear service door flanked by glass sidelights at the approximate center of the street-facing composition. Like the other buildings, there is no main focal point or entrance, which enhances the sense of privacy and evokes a suggestion of mystery to the otherwise large, residential complex. Windows are various sizes, with combinations of three-part steel sash windows (operable-fixed-operable), aluminum sliders and some jalousie windows. Alternating second floor windows are emphasized by stepped out, exaggerated, thick, custom surrounds. One known aluminum sliding window on the first floor of Building A was replaced by the same type and configuration, but with applied grids (date unknown, post 2019, Figure 5). That minor alteration does not affect the three-building, 37-unit Glendale Garden Homes property’s otherwise high integrity.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *P3a. Description: Continued from page 4
The endwall at the complex entrance is
subtly embellished by inset painted
wood, thin continuous grids that suggest
shoji screens on Buildings A (Figures 5
and 6).
The fenestration and features of Building
B are entirely different, considering the
buildings’ identical heights, roof styles
and material palettes. The irregularly
shaped Building B has three short legs
that contain upper, covered porches over
ground floor patios. Patios were
originally and are currently enclosed by
wood fences (County Assessor 1958).
Each of those street-facing legs are
separated by inset bays of differing
depths, a technique which contributes to
all of the buildings’ senses of distinction
from one another.
Buildings B and C vary widely in their
entrance configurations to units, their
fenestration patterns and window types
as does Building A.
Figure 5: Building A, northeast corner and
endwall at entrance. View southwest.
Note the address in stylized numbers as
well as the painted, decorative wood grid.
Figure 6: Building A, southwest corner and
endwall at entrance. View southwest. Note
the second floor, covered porch and enclosed
first floor patio.
Those buildings are served by a shared, north driveway from Central. It terminates in a parallel row of two carports and a wide, double-loaded, paved drive that meets the main driveway in a T. Second floor units are located above the continuous carports, which are shaded by painted wood, full-length, flat, shallow, cantilevered awnings, a feature shared at other carports. A central walkway lined by mature trees and bushes connects the carports to the southern east-west internal walkway. None of the pedestrian paths terminate in a dead end; all paths interconnect with others.
At the rear of the
complex, there is a
rectangular swimming
pool complex with a
wrap-around, L-shaped
nearly flat-roofed
Cabana building. The
Cabana is oriented
facing the pool and
includes a tiled, full
restroom with a shower
and three semi-private,
shaded bays on the west
leg. The south leg has an
open, shared, kitchen
(Figures 7 and 9) with a
shaded dining area. The
building shares deep
overhangs and the
canted fascia detail. At
the end of that leg, there
is a raised sun deck
reached discretely by an
exposed, outdoor stair
(Figure 8).
Figure 7: Open kitchen and dining area at pool Cabana. View southwest. Note the food prep area with sink and cabinets, as - well as the finished walls and ceiling with painted, toungue- and-groove wood and the continuous, exposed header. The canted fascia detail is barely visible at the top right hand side.
Figure 8: Tanning platform at east end of
Cabana building. View southwest. Open
stair railing detail is common among all
stairwells in Glendale Garden Homes.
Note the tropical planter that enchances
privacy and reinforces the tropical
undertones of the landscaping palette.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *P3a. Description: Continued from page 5
Like the rest of the Glendale Garden Homes complex, the swimming pool complex enhances the indoor-outdoor lifestyle and is remarkably unchanged from its original design, materials, location, workmanship and feeling. The pool and Cabana can be considered the embodiment of post-war optimism, the prosperity of the rising middle class with its attendant “family values,” where recreation time would be plentiful, barbecuing was considered an action verb and direct sunshine was widely welcomed as a health benefit.
As originally planned and built, the Glendale Garden Homes had an understated, wooded pedestrian street entrance that was merely a landscaped opening between Buildings A and B. A concrete path led from the sidewalk on Central between parallel lines of eucalyptus trees to the “inside” garden courtyard created by the two buildings. In 1998, slate and concrete-capped posts with Craftsman-influenced light
fixtures, as well a continuous metal fence, central pedestrian and automobile gates and a painted wood pergola at the
entrance were added (Glendale. City of. BP #B10069753,
Figure 6). While those non-contributing features were likely installed to increase security, the addition of those objects do not reduce the property’s otherwise high level of integrity.
Those objects were added to the property and can easily be removed in the future without causing damage to the
buildings, landscape or property; therefore the exceptional integrity of the complex remains.
Figure 9: Glendale Garden Homes swimming pool complex. View southwest toward sundeck (left) and Cabana (right).
Throughout the complex, wide central pedestrian paths or “courtyard pathways” bisect the lush garden courts and connect each of the buildings with the larger property. The main paths are characterized by medium- sized, polished stone aggregate cast into concrete, separated by redwood expansion joints, a costly, now archaic decorative detail, which was typical of the era (Figure 10). That custom, luxury paving material alternates with broom-swept concrete-finished sections which articulate visual animation to the paths. The paved areas are at wider intersections and are punctuated by staggered control joints. Limited walkway areas may have been replaced over time as necessary, but that minor alteration does not reduce the overall integrity of the larger property or of its landscape.
At Central Avenue, the main entrance walkway shares the alternating brushed and small aggregate concrete paving with the redwood expansion joint detail. Buildings A and C are each set back from the street by manicured lawn areas. Mature bushes and trees soften the appearance of the buildings and add to the sense of privacy for those apartment units.
Figure 10: At right, Glendale Garden Homes detail of main pedestrian walkway paving areas. The material is poured-in-place concrete, with polished stone aggregate and redwood expansion joints. The combination of concrete, polished stones and redwood was considered a high-style detail of the time.
The subject property contains a remarkable number of mature trees. Its landscape notably includes nearly 100 trees, including an allée of towering eucalyptus “ghost gum” trees at the main entrance, which continue through the front gate (Refer to Photo P5a).
Other tree groupings include a double row of large ficus trees leading to the pool and Cabana (Figure 4). There is at least one walnut tree which may have been planted in the late 1910s near the central carports. The mature tree palate further contains Australian cheesewood (snowdrop), evergreen cypress and pine trees, as well as jacaranda, mimosa and ash, which naturally enrich soil and sweetgums that are deciduous and create plentiful shade. There are numerous mature palm trees as well as smaller palms, including ponytail palms and topiary (shaped) bushes, in keeping with the post-war tropical and Japanese-influenced landscaping trends in southern California. There is at least one, very old, fruit-bearing lemon tree near the entrance.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *P3a. Description: Continued from page 5
Other fruit trees include banana, orange, miniature tangerine, Marumi (round) kumquat and fig trees (Figure 12 page 8). It is noted that the Arborist Report used in Figure 11 did not identify those trees, among many others. Tree #35, for instance, is a known, active and productive lemon tree, not a eucalyptus tree.
Lower bushes and foundation plantings include dracaena, pittosporum, hardy ligustrum, oleander and varied tropical flowering bushes, including azalea, bougainvillea, numerous birds of paradise, bunches of clivia, groups of hibiscus, clusters of lilies of the Nile, star jasmine drifts and a remarkable, two-story pink, flowering camellia. The tall, street-facing jararaca and liquidambar trees are illuminated at night which enhances the designed landscape and the property’s overall feeling of verdant abundance.
Figure 11: Building A, view southeast from
interior courtyard with brick bench in foreground,
and multi-trunk trees in the “elbow” of the
building. Note the unit entrances at the left and
center, first and second floors, as well as the ship-
lap-finished, enclosed patio and porch below, on
the right-hand side. The characteristic canted roof
fascia are visible (painted green) with deep, stucco
overhanging roof eaves. The low, dark green
pedestrian streetlight standard with its plastic
“acorn” luminaire is not original but does not
affect the overall integrity of Glendale Garden
Homes. The streetlights were added at an
unknown time and are removable without
causing damage to the property or its
surroundings.
Glendale Garden Homes is located on an L-shaped, through-lot parcel. The lot slopes gently downhill toward the south and is 1.99 acres in size, (or 86, 680 SF (Los Angeles County Assessor 2025). The property is bounded on the north, south and west sides by single and multi-family buildings that range between one to three stories in height. In the east side, the property abuts a two-lane street, with one- to three story, primarily multi-family buildings. The historic resource boundaries are those which were historically associated with APN 5633-006-014.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *P3a.
Description:
Continued from
page 7
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *B10. Significance Continued from page 2
The historic significance of those properties was based in the “unique grouping of postwar medical office buildings that embody distinctive characteristics of their architectural type and period of construction in Glendale” (ibid). The assemblage of medical office buildings probably should have been more fully considered at the time as a local historic district. Local historic districts are defined as “a geographically definable area possessing a significant concentration [four separate buildings and properties at an intersection], linkage or continuity of properties [developed by Causey & Rhodes, all medical office building uses] that constitute more than sixty (60) percent of the total properties in the district [four of four, 100 percent] and which are united historically [same uses, developer, architectural styles, low scales and prim expression of masonry (brick, natural stone and concrete) materials in Mid-Century Modern design language] or aesthetically by plan [arranged around a prominent intersection] or physical development [developed over a decade]” (Glendale Municipal Code 2004).
Gill’s sometime partner, Joseph G. Causey (1913-1997) was considered “One of Glendale's important and successful businessmen,” as the “owner of Causey & Causey and president of the Verdugo Development Corp” between 1947 and 1961. He was known first as a realtor, with specialization in… “income property construction and sales” (Parcher 1957). Joe Causey was the sole owner of the construction firm, which was established in 1952. When interviewed regarding the subject property, Mr. Causey exclaimed “Glendale Garden Homes marks a milestone in Glendale's growth and indicates a trend which will become more and more apparent as the pressure from mounting population increases” (Glendale News-Press 1957). That year, Glendale Garden Homes project was notably announced in the prestigious national journal Engineering News & Record as well (1957). Causey and Causey may not have known at the time that as a late example of garden apartments, Glendale Garden Homes was an imaginative and surprisingly practical model for multi-family home development in Glendale.
Aside from being built and later owned by the Causeys, Glendale Garden Homes was a family affair in other ways. The Causey siblings’ widowed mother, Margaret Wells Causey (1889-1968) lived in Building A as early as 1958 (Glendale City Directory 1958).
Gill and June owned the property for the decades between 1967 and ’87, after which Joseph Causey owned it through a trust.
Joseph Causey lived at the subject property in 1989, listing it as his residence for nearly more decades, until his passing in 1997. Gill, probably with his family, also maintained a unit in Building C at least between 1971 and as late as 1989 according to the local directory (Glendale City Directory 1971 and Glendale City Directory 1989). Gill Causey passed away in 1981.
Norwood & Delonge
The Glendale Garden Homes assemblage of interrelated buildings was notably designed by Norwood & Delonge. They were John L. “Jack” Norwood (b. 1914) and John W. “Jack” DeLonge (1914-1987). Messrs. Norwood and Delonge were affiliated between 1946 and 1987, collaborating on a prolific body of work as general contractors, designers and developers in the greater Los Angeles region. Norwood and & DeLonge were recognized as “Practitioners in Pasadena” between 1935 and 1965 in Pasadena’s “Presence of the Recent Past” context studies (Pasadena 2007 and 2018).
In the late 1950s and early ‘60s, the pair was directly associated with similar, upscale, multi-family properties on South Orange Grove Avenue in Pasadena, including Grosvenor Square, 924 South Orange Grove Drive, Pasadena, builder, considered locally eligible for designation (built in 1953) and 1040 South Orange Grove Drive, Pasadena, owner and builder (1963, Pasadena “California Historical Resources Inventory Database” 2023). It is said that by building Glendale Garden Homes, “the city of Glendale was trying to ‘come up to the caliber’ of apartments and condos being designed in Pasadena, specifically on Orange Grove Boulevard” (Bailey 2004b). The 1040 South Orange Grove property was described much like Glendale Garden Homes: “Modern style… buildings arranged in village setting with concrete footpaths and formal landscaping throughout” (ibid).
Edgar Gregg and Artistic Homes, Inc.
Edgar N. Gregg (1903-1995) was a Glendale-based developer who also subdivided and built the adjacent tract, Parkwood (Tract No. 18547) in 1953. Parkwood consists of 18 single-family residences built in the 1950s. Gregg’s Artistic Homes also designed or built the Monterey Revival style residence at 1336 Rossmoyne Avenue in 1937 and 801-803 East Doran St. in 1938. Gregg Artistic Homes developed hundreds of residential properties in Glendale, including Oakmont View, Phases 1-IV and may have been founded in 1934 by Alice Lee Gregg (Kim 2022). Mrs. Gregg was a notably licensed architect between 1986 and 1995 (California Architects Board 2023).
Mr. Gregg transferred the property to general contractor, Gill Causey, with his wife in 1967. A decade later, it came into the ownership of Joseph Causey in an individual trust (see Causey & Causey section, pages 2 and 9). The current owner first purchased the property in 1997 with an associate.
Unit Types
When built, the Glendale Garden Homes project featured what are considered “superior” rather than standard unit types. (Los Angeles County Tax Assessor 1958).
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 9
The apartments notably have entrance
foyers with coat closets. There are
wood-burning fireplaces with “floating”
(cantilevered) hearths in living and
dining rooms (Figure 13). Dining rooms
in four units have copper hoods over the
back-to-back interior barbeques that
abut the main fireplaces. Others had
wet bars with shuttered openings to
dining rooms. Demising walls
separating the living and dining rooms
vary between natural or painted brick.
Formal dining rooms feature
overpainted natural wood, birch
paneling with custom-built “service”
opening pass-through doors to the full-
sized kitchens (Figure 14).
The units all have ample storage, and
separate, rear, signed service entrances.
Figure 13: Floating hearth at living
room fireplace in 2-bedroom unit.
https://www.zillow. com/
homedetails/1303-N-Central-Ave-
Glendale-CA-91202/2116115308
_zpid/?mmlb=g,10
Figure 14: View to kitchen from dining room through
shuttered pass-through with built-in shelf and drawers
below. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1303-N-
Central-Ave-Glendale-CA-91202/2116115308 _zpid/
?mmlb=g,3
The two- and three-bedroom apartments are far larger than average local apartment units, ranging from 1,600 to 2,000 square feet.
They feature full, tiled bathrooms, dressing areas, built in-linen closets and integral dressers in the ample closets. Second bathrooms have neo-angle, glass shower enclosures with heavy chrome extrusions. The back (service) entrances, which are a notable feature as well, have substantial storage lockers just outside the rear doors. The upscale appointments make the units feel much more like impressive homes than apartments. Original promotional material included a multi-leaf, color pamphlet that publicized the property’s luxurious, home-like features with rendered drawings and descriptions enumerating the elaborate features and fixtures (Figures 14-20).
Landscape
The subject property parcel was originally more than two acres in size. When that large property with an “attractive country home” was sold in 1917, it was advertised in the Los Angeles Herald as planted in “walnuts and a variety of fruits;” with the phrase “landscape gardening.” That early two-story “country residence” with front and rear porches became the home of Marie and George Larkey by the 1920s. The Larkeys previously operated an orange grove in the foothills (“Building Outlay In Glendale” 1912). Mrs. Larkey (1873-1945) was “instrumental in developing the school garden movement in the Los Angeles City Schools” beginning in 1912 (Elvin and Binheim 1928). The Los Angeles Times reported on the more than 7,000 trees planted by students at public schools who studied forestry in her program ("Tree Planting to be Resumed" 1927 and “Schools Train Tree Planters…” 1928). Marie A. Larkey was a teacher, a lecturer on agriculture and a vocational coordinator (University of Southern California 1925). Her husband, George A. Larkey (1856-1931) was a school principal (Los Angeles City School District 1924). It can be assumed that some of the remaining, mature fruit and other trees on the subject property may have been planted by the Larkeys, as she was considered an authority on both tree planting and maintenance. At least one walnut tree may remain on the property.
That walnut tree is #50 in Figure 11; it may be mislabeled in the project “Arborist Tree Report.” The subject property was located just outside of the city of Glendale in Los Angeles County until 1926, when it was annexed as part of the nearly 20-acre Casa Verdugo District. After Mrs. Larkey’s passing in 1945, the property became the home of Jane and Charles F. Gummo. Mr. Gummo (1896-1965) was an accountant. According to directory research, Ms. Gummo, who may have been a relative, worked for a local bank after his death. The original two-story residence was demolished in 1955 to make way for the subject property garden apartment complex (BP# 48718).
The development of Glendale Garden Homes was described in a variety of contemporary sources. In 1956, Southern California Plasterer, which was an otherwise unlikely source for landscaping information, described the grounds of the future project as being “enhanced by the retention of much of the original shrubbery.” That characterization corroborates a former tenant’s description of mature trees being retained (other than palm trees) when the complex was built (Glendale News-Press 2004). The property’s designed landscape retained a reported more than 90 mature trees as of 2019 (ESA 2019). The known, mature tree population includes ash, cypress, eucalyptus, jacaranda, ficus, palm, pine, sweetgum and at least one walnut (Figure 12 and Description section). Fruit trees remaining on the property include mature lemon, tangerine and kumquat specimens, which are notably not mentioned in the owner’s Arborist Tree Report.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 11
The garden courts are unified by pedestrian paths with square, U-shaped brick benches and continuous beds of Boston ivy. The effect of the landscape provides interior vistas in every direction that soften the overall appearance and feeling of the complex, creating various secret gardens, outdoor “rooms” and contrasting views. The landscaped garden is as important to this property’s significance as is its distinctive Mid-Century Modern architecture.
The referenced “Arborist Tree Report” prepared by McKinley & Associates was surprisingly prepared using only photographs supplied by the property owner, according to its cover letter (2020). There is no record of a site visit by the Certified Arborist. Mr.
McKinley, who prepared the document, recently stated in an e-mail that he normally makes site visits for such reports (e-mail from William McKinley to Lee Smith, January 23, 2025). Aside from the fact that the report was prepared half a decade ago, its results are diminished by its preparation without an in-person site visit, in addition to the unidentified large nut and fruit trees. Site visits are a crucial early activity in preparing an accurate Arborist Tree Report.
Advertising
Before Glendale Garden Homes was completed, the upcoming complex was advertised in the Los Angeles Times. A black and white rendering was featured in spring 1957, describing the project. That ad accurately communicated the coming “two and three- bedroom apartments …. located in three two-story stucco and redwood buildings…” The million-dollar cost was mentioned, along with its “landscaped recreation area…” Glendale Garden Homes Co. was cited as the owner (Los Angeles Times 1957a).
Once the complex was built, in October of 1957 a large, classified advertisement featuring a star symbol called the Glendale Garden Homes complex “a new design for living.” It suggested that new tenants “enjoy living in a gracious modern home with apartment freedom from ordinary house care and responsibility.” The ad touted the “swim pool and sun deck” in capital letters, citing “dressing rooms & showers. Plus poolside kitchen with electric barbeque and eating cabanas.” Units were described as having “Master dressing rooms” and costs ranging from $255 to $350 per month. Prospective tenants could see them “every afternoon.” It was “Conveniently located in the heart of the fine home neighborhood just minutes from downtown Glendale and a comfortable drive to all of Southern Calif.” (Los Angeles Times 1957b). The year after it was completed, Los Angeles Times featured an article boasting that the million-dollar project was nearly 75 percent occupied (Los Angeles Times 1958b). The actual original rents were between $250 and $400 per month (The California Plasterer 1956). A contemporary ad in the Los Angeles Times announced that the “last apartments” were leasing… (Los Angeles Times 1958b). There was a telephone number to call to receive the remarkable, illustrated brochure (Figures 15-21).
Figure 15: Glendale Garden Homes
fold-out, multi-page pamphlet cover
featuring a line drawing of a private
main unit entrance with a natural
wood slab door, exaggerated door
surround (a feature of the style)
mature trees and plantings. Source:
Provided by Glendale Community
Development Department staff, no
date (typical of pamphlet material).
Figures 15-21 describe the
property’s ample unit sizes,
private at-grade porches and
patios, carports, storage lockers,
rich interior and exterior
materials, verdant landscape,
sliding doors, custom wallpaper
and paint in then-fashionable
color palettes and custom
cabinetry. The units were air
conditioned and featured
intercoms with AM/FM radio,
television coaxial cable and
“amplified service for color
[television] reception.”
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 11
The brochure described the heated pool and Cabana features. The complex was advertised with the six renderings below and on the previous page using evocative words including “spacious,” “beautiful,” “modern” and “luxurious.” The costly leasing brochure demonstrates that the then-owners were willing to pay well to ensure the best long-term tenants possible. Life at Glendale Garden Homes was promised to future renters to be as “Modern as tomorrow,” an advertising claim that would be difficult to dispute. Other more practical features such as “heavy shake roofs,” “all-wool” carpets and “forced air heaters” were described as well.
Figure 17: Glendale Garden Homes original leasing brochure describing the units’ large sizes, privacy, dressing and bathrooms, ample carports, foyers and generous storage.
Figure 18: Subject property’s first leasing brochure enumerating the original roof with other exterior (and interior) upscale finish materials, verdant plantings, finishes, high-end cabinetry and masonry materials.
Figure 19: Glendale Garden Homes original leasing advertisement depicting an idyllic future for renters. Superior features including heating and air conditioning systems, all-electric appliances, cable, apartment intercoms, radio and laundry facilities in each building are itemized.
Figure 20: Glendale Garden Homes rendering above of the Cabana area with heated swimming pool, changing rooms, a restroom with showers and nearly full kitchen with a no-longer-extant electric barbecue.
In 1957, conditioned air, particularly “whole house air conditioning was considered a luxury” (Nilsson 2010). At the time, the U.S. population was more than 165,000,000 persons but fewer than 500,000 residences were estimated to have any type of air conditioning (ibid). The fact that Glendale Garden Homes had central air conditioning at the time was significant and reinforces the property’s identity and reputation as a luxury property.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 12 Figure 21: Fold-out rental brochure, circa
1958, showing bird’s-
eye perspective,
three-color rendering
of Glendale Garden
Homes. The view is
northwest, from
Central Avenue,
depicting mature
trees, interior garden
courts with a network
of pedestrian
walkways with the
swimming pool and
Cabana in the
distance.
By January of the following year, smaller display ads with photographs recommended that prospective tenants “enjoy the graciousness of a modern… home,” suggesting that they “drive over and see how beautiful life can be” (Los Angeles Times 1958a) Additional amenities including fireplaces, soundproofing, “ample closets,” air conditioning, all wool carpeting and “modern spacious floor plans“ were enumerated in the ad. Glendale Garden Homes was said to be “located in the fine residential section of Glendale” (ibid).
Garden Apartments
In the South Glendale Community Plan, in Appendix J- “South Glendale Historic Context Statement” under “Context: Multi-Family Residential Development (1910-2000)” and “Theme: Post-World War II Multi-Family Residential Development (1945-1979),” it pronounces
Multi-family residential development during the postwar period was influenced by planning and design principles dating to the 1920s. The Garden City Movement in particular had a profound influence on the design of multi-family housing, as did the publication of Clarence Stein’s Toward New Towns (1951). During the postwar period, local architects and community planners adapted the principles of these movements and constructed innovative new forms of multiple family housing. A new multiple family housing type known as “garden apartments” emerged at this time. Characteristics of garden apartments include the use of superblocks in development of the site, the segregation of automobile and pedestrian traffic, low to medium density and building coverage, the standardization of building types with a maximum of three stories in height, and an emphasis on landscaping and open space (2018a).
Also in the South Glendale Historic Context Statement, under the category “Post-World War II Multi-family Residential Development (1945-1979): Property Types & Registration Requirements,” for the garden apartment property type it directs that “In South Glendale, multi-family residential development continued in earnest in the post-World War II period. Multi-family residences were interspersed with single-family residences in neighborhoods throughout South Glendale. Multi-family residences are plentiful in the study area and represent a range of multi-family property types and architectural styles” (2018a).
It specifies that “A multi-family residential property from this period may be significant under this context:
CRITERIA (National/
California/ local Register)
REASON GLENDALE
GARDEN HOMES
A/1/1 (Event) “As a unique or rare representation of a
particular type of multi-family residential
development. Eligible examples may
represent the first or best example of a
specific type of multi-family residential
development; reflect important
development patterns from the period in
South Glendale [or in this case, North
Glendale]…”(Glendale 2018a)
The Glendale Garden Homes complex is an undeniable and
exemplary local example of the garden apartment type as set forth in the registration criteria. With its landscaping materials and design, it is an unimpeachable instance of the local garden apartment development pattern from the postwar period in North Glendale. It is characteristically compatible in its scale and design with the surrounding environment and was
designed to blend into its own abundant landscape. North Glendale is an arbitrary geographic boundary that is intended to differentiate parts of the community for planning purposes.
The property is eligible for listing in the California and Glendale Registers under Criteria 1 and 1.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 13
CRITERIA (National/
California/ local Register)
REASON GLENDALE
GARDEN HOMES
C/3/3 (Architecture) “As an excellent or rare example of an architectural style or property type from
the period. Additional information about
architectural styles from each period and
their associated character-defining
features are outlined in the Architecture
& Design context” (Glendale 2018a).
Glendale Garden Homes is a remarkable example of an architect- designed, Mid-Century Modern style garden apartment complex.
Those character-defining features demonstrated in the subject property are the two- (Buildings A, B and C) and single-story (Cabana and one carport) configurations; the horizontal massing and orientation exhibited in the small-scale buildings; the simple, geometric restrained decorative forms; the expressed post-and- beam Cabana construction; the low-pitched, gable-on-hip and gabled roofs with wide, overhanging eaves and cantilevered canopies, and nearly flat, overhanging, deep Cabana roof; the simple, mostly unadorned wall surfaces; the painted redwood, sand-finished plaster, brick, slate and magnesite used as exterior wall finishes and accent materials; the flush-mounted metal frame fixed windows and sliding doors; the plentiful exterior staircases, decks, patios and balconies and the limited exterior decorative detailing. The property is eligible for listing in the California and Glendale Registers under Criteria 3 and 3.
As described in the table above, the Glendale Garden Homes property qualifies for listing in the Glendale and California Registers under both associative and architecture criteria. The garden apartment property type has been the subject of a considerable amount of recent research and discourse. In 2004, the Glendale Historical Society reported that “growing interest in Glendale's Modernist multifamily residences motivate[d] the City to study their historic context” (TGHS 2004). That study and report were being prepared by an intern and were not completed, according to city staff (Platt 2023).
The Cultural Landscape Foundation (TCLF), a non-profit, affirms that garden apartments in the region “represent the fruition of innovative concepts developed by visionary early 20th century reformers who believed that all people, regardless of income, social standing, and in many cases, ethnicity, were worthy of better and more humane housing. In “Greater Visibility for Los Angeles Garden Apartments” they describe the “forward-thinking planning, architecture and landscape design principles and deliberate thinking about every aspect of their design, believing that easy access to fresh air, recreation and shared open green spaces would create strong community bonds and an easy sociability” (TCLF 2023).
The current state of garden apartment complexes is further described by TCLF as being “increasingly vulnerable to demolition and redevelopment” as is currently the case for Glendale Garden Homes (ibid). They assert that “garden apartments were a brilliant integration of architecture and planning, and perhaps most importantly, landscape architecture. This belief and understanding of the important role of landscape architects in site planning and the importance of their involvement from the outset made these communities extraordinary” (ibid). As described herein, it is the unique comingling of carefully executed Mid-Century Modern architecture with the remarkable designed, mature landscaped gardens exemplified in the Glendale Garden Homes community that makes the property historically significant in Glendale and California. TCLF illustrated the type and Glendale Garden Homes, ”their landscapes were simple yet effective, with an emphasis on recreation, functional open space, and low maintenance” (ibid).
The planted garden courts at Glendale Garden Homes were a response to the existing site, including reported retention of mature trees and other plantings. It is said that among the existing trees when the complex was built, only palm trees were removed to make way for the garden apartments (Bailey 2004b). The resulting design created a variety of composed garden scenes, which were modern expressions of traditional landscape principles. Those tenets include creating a sense of unity and subtle consistency in the complex gardens, the use of focalization on certain elements such as large trees, careful control of the low scale and proportion, the establishment of subtle rhythms with limited repetition, the application of regulating lines in high and low walls and pedestrian paths, the use of varied textures, contrast and color.
Recently the various concepts and conditions that together created garden apartments were described in By-Right, By-Design:
Housing Development Versus Housing Design in Los Angeles:
The belief that good design is for everyone, rich, poor and middle-income alike was present when Baldwin Hills Village was built. The Depression and World War II spurred a transition from more costly period styles to a more streamlined architectural language and motivated socially oriented housing experimentation along the garden apartment model….
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 14
Work for architects was scarce [in the 1940s] so as the garden apartment evolved, most projects were designed as joint ventures, ensuring that opportunities were spread among many. Although these efforts produced most[ly] vernacular buildings, many well-known architects participated… Garden apartments were built mostly in California Modern [styles]… (2020)
Glendale Garden Homes is a superlative local example of an architect-designed California-influenced Mid-Century Modern style garden apartment complex. It is not known who designed the landscape to accommodate existing trees but it seems reasonably obvious that the garden design for the subject property was entirely intentional. The National Park Service defines a “historic designed landscape” in “Preservation Brief 36: Protecting Cultural Landscapes” as a landscape that was consciously designed or laid out by a landscape architect, master gardener, architect, or horticulturist according to design principles, or an amateur gardener working in a recognized style or tradition. The landscape may be associated with a significant person(s), trend, or event in landscape architecture; or illustrate an important development in the theory and practice of landscape architecture. Aesthetic values play a significant role in designed landscapes… (1994).
While Glendale Garden Homes may be a reasonably late example of the type, it is even so a historic designed landscape and is directly associated with, and is an instance of, the garden apartment trend in the greater Los Angeles area, specifically in Glendale.
Its lush landscaping was a conscious effort to create a cohesive community, where tall trees establish park-like grounds, and buildings are separated by generous areas planted in foundational and groundcover plantings of various types, textures, heights and colors. Glendale Garden Homes is an intact and exemplary late illustration of the garden apartment type, under the established larger historic context of “Residential Development and Suburbanization” and the theme of “Community Planning and Development: Garden City Planning Principles, 1937-1955” (Los Angeles Conservancy 2012). The subject property may date from two years beyond the identified county-wide period, however it is nonetheless a clear, if modestly delayed instance of the garden apartment type in Glendale, not Los Angeles.
Preservation Brief 36 directs: “Wise stewardship protects the character, and or spirit of a place by recognizing history as change over time” (National Park Service 1994). When it was conceived and built, Glendale Garden Homes reflected the new trend against building large single-family homes on generous parcels of more than an acre in size. Its features include circulation hubs at various intersections, interconnected spatial relationships among buildings, different unit types and sizes and the lushly planted landscape.
Because of the different building shapes and configurations, it has a myriad of exterior views, with unique viewsheds and special vistas that are created by the collection of the complex’s individual building and planting components.
Comparison With Like Properties
Comparison with other comparable properties is normally undertaken to evaluate properties for historic significance within the specific area of study (Glendale), the theme (Garden Apartments), and time period (Post-War). Glendale was nearly fully built out by the late 1950s in the immediate area, which probably affected the subject property’s overall size. Comparing the subject property to other garden apartment complexes that are local representative examples of the type, none of the Glendale examples that have been found to be eligible for local designation meet each of the registration criteria in the county-wide Garden Apartments of Los Angeles: Historic Context Statement that specified a subjective minimum size of three acres.
That, more broad Los Angeles Conservancy-prepared context statement acknowledged that the buildings themselves are typically (and deliberately) architecturally modest. Emphasis is placed, rather, on site plan and landscape; the designers relied on color, texture, planting plan, light and shadow to create visual interest. Building entrances face landscaped courtyards rather than the street, and parking and vehicular circulation is relegated to the perimeter of the site plan or within garage courts separate from pedestrian areas. Large, expansive green space is common; typically there are one or two large courtyards or greens at the nucleus of the complexes available to all residents. Garden apartments vary in appearance, size and plan; however, the following character defining features epitomize the property type in its purest expression:
• Superblock site plan, which deviates from the rectilinear urban grid by combining multiple city blocks or parcels into a single property…
• Three acres in size or greater
• Low-slung buildings, rarely exceeding two stories in height • Elimination of common interior corridors
• Repetition of nearly identical building models throughout the plan • Stylistic simplicity; buildings are usually minimal in appearance with a lack of stylistic details and ornament • Primary building entrances face common courtyards rather than the street • Parking at the perimeter of the site plan, typically in detached, enclosed garage buildings or garage courts DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
* Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 15
• One or more large open spaces, or greens, located at the interior of the site plan, around which buildings are arranged
• Recreational amenities planned to help foster community • Variety of landscape, often native or drought tolerant; low shrubs used to delineate outdoor “rooms”; allées; mature trees and the use of climbing vines to add visual interest to buildings (Los Angeles Conservancy 2012).
Glendale Garden Homes is not mentioned in the Conservancy’s study; however, its scope was “generally limited to [Los Angeles] city limits” (ibid). In Los Angeles County, only 38 properties were identified in total and few properties outside of the City of Los Angeles were identified in that survey (“Map of Known Garden Apartments, Los Angeles (City and County)” 2012).
In the most recent applicable local guidance, specific to the City of Glendale, “South Glendale Historic Context” specifies the following for “Post-World War II Multi-family Residential Development (1945-1979),” “Property Types & Registration Requirements, Property Types: Apartment House, Courtyard Apartment, Garden Apartment, Stucco Box, High Rise Apartment/Condominium”:
a multi-family residential property from this period may be significant under National, California or local landmark criteria for its associative significance.
If it were eligible under Criteria A/1/1, it would be “As a unique representative of [the garden apartment, which is] a particular type of multi-family residential development. Examples may represent… the best of a specific style of multi- family residential development [such as Mid-Century Modern] … [or] reflect important patterns [building luxury complexes] from the [Post-War] period in … Glendale…. (emphasis added 2018b) That related survey found three properties, 316-328 West Palmer Avenue, Verdugo Apartments and Glendale Manor to be locally significant examples of the garden apartment type. They are compared with Glendale Garden Homes below:
320 West Palmer Avenue (1948)- The four-building complex includes 316-328 West Palmer Avenue. The Minimal Traditional design, while pleasant, is not particularly remarkable in Glendale (Figures 22 and 23). Minimal Traditional architecture is a reasonably common type. Landscaping, other than scattered trees and bushes, is primarily limited to lawn rather than actual landscaped gardens. At just over one half an acre, the property is not three acres in size, but that land requirement is not a local registration requirement. Because its architecture style and expression, as well as its garden courts, collectively, are not as exceptional as Glendale Garden Homes or as specific to the garden apartment type, the subject property is a more estimable and significant local model of the type overall.
Figure 22: 316-328 West Palmer Street complex, view southeast from sidewalk. Decorative, white faux streetlight standards and at least one street-facing window was replaced with a different type and light arrangement (dates unknown).
Figure 23: 316-328 West Palmer Street complex, view
southeast from sidewalk. Decorative shutters may have
been added to certain second floor windows (date
unknown).
Verdugo Apartments, 701 South Verdugo/1372‐1390 Kent Place (1950)- Found locally eligible as “Good example of a post‐World War II garden apartment complex; good example of Mid‐century Modern architecture” (Glendale 2018). The design is a notable example of the style, however its landscaped areas are primarily the street-facing yards and other public areas. The property contains 12 units on less than one acre, but that does not reduce its local importance. Landscaped areas are planted in mature trees, bushes and lawn but there is no plant material in the two large, central auto courts (Figures 24a and 24b, page 17). In addition, the very small rear garden court area seems to be merely modest left-over space. For those reasons, Glendale Garden Homes represents a more focal local example of the garden apartment type than Verdugo Apartments, which was identified as significant.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
* Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 16
Figures 24a and 24b: Verdugo Apartments at 701 South Verdugo Road, view southeast from intersection at right (Figure 24a). Note the contemporary design style, tall mature trees and deep front lawn. One of two hidden, paved auto courts at the property is behind the 1378-1380 and 1382-1388 Kent Place buildings in Figure 24b on right.
Glendale Manor, 501-529 East Maple Street, 601-613 Granada Street (1945)- Found locally eligible as “Good example of a post- World War II garden apartment complex” (Glendale 2018). The Minimal Traditional design is an example of the style, and its landscaped areas are well planted and more robust examples of community gardens than Verdugo Apartments. The property contains 55 units on more than two acres (2.33 acres). The landscaped areas have mature trees, bushes and lawn. The limited double-loaded auto courts do not reduce the importance of the integrated gardens at this property (Figure 25). The recognized historic significance of Glendale Manor is roughly equal to the design and associative importance of Glendale Garden Homes.
Figure 25: Glendale
Manor outlined in red,
dashed line. Annotated
aerial view facing south.
Horseshoe-shaped
walkways in park-like
settings lead to two-story
buildings flanking the
walks and at the south
side of the large parcel.
Another property to compare with Glendale Garden Homes is Parkwood Gardens at 1317 North Brand Avenue. That property was not included in the City of Glendale “South Glendale Historic Resources Survey” because it is located three and one-half blocks beyond the designated South Glendale Community Plan Area (“Study Area”) but is comparable to the subject property.
Parkwood Gardens,1317 North Brand Boulevard (1957)- Parkwood Gardens is 16 units in two stories with a rear carport. It was also built the same year as Glendale Garden Homes for the Gregg family. Real estate listings reveal that the Mid-Century Modern style complex has smaller units, but shares similar amenities with Glendale Garden Homes, including central air conditioning, large closets and on-site laundry. Its straightforward design is comparable to the subject property and features some of the same architectural details, with the addition of three-panel front doors. The property does have interior planters and tree wells but lacks the generous areas of mature landscaping exhibited in Glendale Garden Homes (Figures 26 and 27, page 18).
That difference make the property not technically meet the current definition of a garden apartment type. In addition, a majority, 12 of the 16 original street-facing aluminum siding windows at Parkwood Gardens (or 75 percent) have been replaced by new units with thicker, bright white extrusions. The building has security bars on some side window openings as well.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
* Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 17
Those described changes alter the appearance and reduce the property’s integrity of design, materials, workmanship and feeling. Parkwood Gardens has not been previously evaluated for historic significance, but at this time is not individually eligible for listing in the Glendale Register as an example of the garden apartment type. To be locally significant for its design under Criterion C, Parkwood Gardens would need to be “an excellent example of an architectural style or property type from the period.” Parkwood Gardens’ original design and materials have been altered, making it a less-than-excellent example of the Mid-Century Modern style and lacks both the noteworthy and sizable gardens that would comprise the garden apartment type.
Figures 26 and 27: Parkwood Gardens, 1317 North Brand Boulevard complex, view northwest (left). The single interior courtyard is depicted at right. View west. Note the combination of exterior finishes, includes sand finished stucco, exposed exterior natural finish and board-and-batten siding in the gable. The wide, second floor shiplap siding is a specific shared exterior feature of the subject property.
Regarding the prescribed minimum three-acre size in the Los Angeles Conservancy’s garden apartment context, the authors admitted “Complexes range in size from just a few acres to more than a hundred” (2012). This evidences the fact that Glendale Garden Homes property is 86,630 square feet; simple arithmetic proves it is a mere 440 square feet, roughly the size of a garage, “short” of meeting the three-acre recommendation in that study. That minor deficiency, which is not specified in the City of Glendale’s guidance does not disqualify the subject property from being considered a garden apartment type as is alleged in the developer-commissioned ESA and Chronicle Heritage analyses (2019 and 2025).
To be locally significant in Glendale for its design, under Criterion 3, it would be “As an excellent example of an architectural style or property type form the period.” In addition,
A property important for illustrating a particular architectural style… must retain most of the physical features that constitute that style... A multi-family residential property significant under Criterion C/3/3 (Architecture) should retain integrity of design, workmanship, materials, and feeling, at a minimum, in order to be eligible for its architectural merit.
A property that has lost some historic materials or details can be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its style in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, pattern of windows and doors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. The property is not eligible, however, if it retains some basic features conveying massing but has lost the majority of the features that once characterized its style (Glendale 2018).
Glendale Garden Homes is an outstanding local example of the garden apartment property type. It plainly represents the Post- World War II Multi-family Residential Development (1945-1979) and retains high integrity. The guidance for a different area of the city, South Glendale “Post-World War II Multi-family Residential Development (1945-1979): Integrity Considerations” specifies that “In order to be eligible for listing at the federal or state levels, a property must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic significance under the Post-World War II Multi-Family Residential Development theme… Standard preservation practice requires that a property retain the ability to convey its significance in order to be eligible for designation” (2018).
According to the Glendale Municipal Code in Section 15.20.050 “Findings for listing resources in the Glendale Register of Historic Resources,” the seven aspects of integrity or qualities that, in various combinations, define a historic property’s integrity are:
location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. To retain its historic integrity, a property must possess several, and usually most, of these aspects.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
* Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 18
The property retains its original North Central Avenue location as well as the impeccable immediate setting which is primarily defined by the semi-private mature garden and recreation areas in the Glendale Garden Homes complex. The subject property’s specific location in the low foothills, setback from a tertiary street, has not changed since it was planned and built. In the years before its construction and subsequently, its larger setting has remained—single and multi-family buildings, with consistent setbacks from the street by landscaped yards, are all low-scale, ranging between one to three floors in height. A decade after it was completed, an upscale grocery store, Crawford’s (later Market Basket and Ralphs) was built down the street. A surrounding small- scale, reasonably low intensity retail community exists in the area as well. Its remarkable immediate and verdant larger setting each remain tangible.
Design includes such components as the original organization of space, the design’s proportions and scale, its restrained uses, ornamentation, and materials. The Glendale Garden Homes complex and buildings clearly retain the original Mid-Century Modern design including the remarkable tropical and Japanese-influenced landscape. gardens with mature trees, swimming pool area and arrangement of buildings. Glendale Garden Homes retains high integrity of its original design, which took great advantage of its designed, landscaped open space that created inner gardens and limited automobile courts set among three low, Mid-century Modern style buildings. The original design was consciously curated during the complex’s conception and planning. A property's design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics.
The subject property’s immediate setting, including mature plantings that comprise a nearly “secret” garden, populated by tall, multi-trunk trees in a wide variety as well as flowering shrubs and drifts of groundcover, the paved system of circulation pathways expressed in concrete, polished stone with redwood, is extant, retains high integrity and moreover is a rare experience. The original property’s massing, its arrangement of spaces and patterns of fenestration, with varied surface materials’ textures and colors, with the quality of ornamental detailing, arrangement and types of trees and plantings in the designed landscape together impart its intact original design as well as retain its immediate and larger setting. The neighborhood is low-scale and has plentiful, mature street trees as well as trees and other plant material which establish larger surrounding neighborhoods on all sides.
Glendale Garden Homes clearly exhibits each of its original materials, including the original sand-finished stucco walls, the painted redwood trim, natural luan entrance, over-painted doors (some with original ornamental escutcheons), metal framed sliding, casement, fixed and jalousie windows, the brick, slate, stone and magnesite finishes, painted wrought iron railings, plain and polished aggregate concrete with redwood walkway materials, shared in-wall mailboxes, the swimming pool shape and its concrete deck. The tree and plant material may have been added to replace certain plants, but the overall impression and effect of those collective materials remains.
In those extant original materials, the original workmanship is retained, including skilled plaster finish work, expert fine redwood carpentry, adept masonry, roofing, and concrete finishing trades which are each embodied in those resulting materials. The complex has been re-roofed, but its original thick wood shake material is no longer allowed in the community, based on fire risk.
The character-defining roof shape, configuration and its details are more important than the archaic material, therefore the change to asphalt shingles does not reduce the property’s overall integrity. Partly because of the retention of those features, with the remarkable mature landscaping materials, design and configuration, the Glendale Garden Homes complex maintains exceptionally high integrity of its original community feeling and its direct association with the garden apartment type.
Glendale Garden Homes was built by skilled tradespersons, whose original pride in their workmanship remains clearly evident. It is legible in the fine exterior finish carpentry and specialized masonry finishes, all of which remain apparent. The subject property expresses the aesthetic sense of the 1950s in its scale and massing. It is formed by the presence of those physical features that together, convey the property's distinct historic character and remain present in the unmistakable feeling evoked by Glendale Garden Homes. Because the complex retains its original, distinctive Mid-Century design, its palette of natural materials, the well- executed workmanship and its surprisingly verdant interior setting, it conveys the feeling of the mid-twentieth century in greater Los Angeles and more specifically, in Glendale. In addition, the tangible connection between the subject property and its expression of the garden apartment type is more than sufficiently intact to convey that indivisible relationship of the property with its type. The retention of this association requires the presence of the physical features that convey the property's historic character including its low-scale proportions, its Mid-century Modern architecture style and its lush landscaping that connects the exterior garden spaces with private unit balconies, covered porches and patios. Glendale Garden Homes complex retains high integrity.
Glendale Garden Homes was previously evaluated for historic significance in 2004 by EP Associates. That report concluded that the property was historically significant. The property was re-evaluated in 2019 by ESA Associates.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 19
Both reports were commissioned by the property owners. The 2019 evaluation concluded that the property was not locally eligible as a separate property for listing in the national, state or Glendale Registers. It was not found locally eligible “as a contributor to a potential historic district,” but the subject property was not evaluated itself as a local historic district or compared to other specific properties in Glendale. That ESA evaluation as well as a less-than-rigorous “Peer Review” completed about five years later (Chronical Heritage 2024) inexplicably limited their contexts to the Los Angeles Conservancy’s 2012 study that omitted properties in Glendale. Only one of two evaluations prepared by the applicant-commissioned companies mentioned the registration requirements established in the South Glendale Historic Context Statement (2018b).
In addition, the EP and ESA evaluations were prepared by consultants who have seldom, if ever, been known to find Glendale properties proposed for demolition or alteration eligible for local landmark designation. Both have publicly disagreed with the city’s survey results to enable private owners to demolish or alter existing buildings. Examples include 352-358 Milford in 2017 and 350, 361-365 Myrtle in 2018 and 2960 St Gregory in 2022. More importantly, the results of their flawed evaluations have consistently been consistently challenged The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS), the community and some by city staff. The two recently collaborated on a project in 2023 for a developer where their findings regarding 5426 San Fernando Road were widely disputed by community members.
Consultants who have built their reputations by enabling developers to demolish known historic properties seem to have their own separate set of professional ethics. The historic preservation field generally considers public interest to be more important than private interest. In The Georgetown Journal of Ethics, a recent article contemplates “Balancing Private and Public Interests in Historic Preservation.” The author recognized “Typically, the general public (the community) wants to retain its right to preserve its historic resources” (McGinnis 2022). If certain consultants consistently argue against local properties being historically significant, not based on evidence, but at the preference of their clients, when should decision-makers recognize the pattern? It should be noted that Glendale Garden Homes was before Glendale City Council as part of a previous, much smaller project in 2004. At the time, The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS) with its members as well as residents of the subject property supported the first consultant’s finding that Glendale Garden Homes was historically significant (EP Associates 2003). In the local historical non-profit group’s quarterly newsletter, there were articles on the subject of garden apartments in Glendale and regarding Glendale Garden Homes. That project was abandoned, but TGHS and at least one larger non-profit, historic preservation organization continue to support the historical significance of the Glendale Garden Homes property with its landscaping. Other proposed projects at the subject property location include an interim 115-unit project, a 131-unit project and the current 149-unit, density bonus project which would demolish the Glendale Garden Homes residential buildings and remove all related landscaping.
The applicant’s paid private consultants ESA and Chronicle Heritage notably argued that Glendale Garden Homes was constructed two years after the Los Angeles Conservancy’s more broad garden apartment study typology’s Los Angeles-focused period of significance closed and was therefore ineligible for local designation. Each relied on the Los Angeles Conservancy’s temporal limitations despite that study’s generalized concentration on a different city. The City of Glendale-prepared South Glendale Historic Context specifies “Post-World War II Multi-family Residential Development” with an established period of significance of 1945 until 1979. Glendale Garden Homes completion in 1957 was well within that locally recognized period of significance and does not disqualify the subject property from being locally individually eligible for its associative significance as a garden apartment. It further qualifies under the more specific “Property Types & Registration Requirements, Property Types: Apartment House, Courtyard Apartment, Garden Apartment, Stucco Box, High Rise Apartment/Condominium” subgroup included in the larger category.
The ESA analysis concluded that the subject property is “not an exemplary individual example of a garden apartment [type}” without providing any justification or examples for that observation (2019). The analysis further stated that there are “more prominent, unique, and notable examples of garden apartments have been identified…” remarkably without identifying those what those instances are in Glendale (ibid). The sympathetic peer review of that analysis, inexplicably prepared five years afterwards, did not correctly apply the specific South Glendale Historic Context identified theme or registration requirements. Furthermore, its remarkably few references to that most applicable local context were to a long out-of-date 2014 draft rather than the last iteration of the document, which was dated January 2018. Following its iteration of the out-of-date local registration requirements, the peer review concluded, mysteriously and without providing defined reasoning, that ESA did not find the subject property separately eligible or as district contributor for the National, state or local registers, which is not an independent conclusion. Neither of the latter two consultants properly applied the South Glendale Historic Context Statement’s correct context, “Multi-Family Residential Development (1910-2000), theme “Post-World War II Multi-Family Residential Development (1945-1979) or considered accurate Property Types & Registration Requirements which are clearly established in the completed 2018 document. Those analyses further failed to accurately consider whether the subject property may be a contributor to an unidentified historic district based on no presented facts, other than their own unfounded conclusions.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update **B10. Significance: Continued from page 20
Qualified City of Glendale staff, Jay Platt found the Glendale Garden Homes property eligible for listing in the Glendale Register of Historic Resources in a memorandum dated September 2024. This evaluation wholly agrees with the lead agency’s findings as well as the identification of numerous fatal flaws in the 2019 and 2024 evaluations. Because the subject property is eligible for separate designation, it was not evaluated under Glendale’s Historic District Overlay Zone Designation Criteria.
The Glendale Garden Homes property is eligible for listing in the Glendale Register of Historic Resources and the California Register of Historical Resources for its associative importance as a garden apartment complex as well as for its Mid-Century Modern design significance.
Glendale Garden Homes complex is an indisputable local and representative regional example of the garden apartment type as specified in the city’s registration criteria. With incorporated landscaping design and plant materials, it is an unassailable example of the local garden apartment development trend from the postwar period in North Glendale. It is characteristically compatible in its low scale and in its restrained style with the surrounding environment, purposefully designed to blend into its own plentiful landscape. Glendale Garden Homes retains exceptionally high integrity to its original appearance. The property is eligible for listing in the Glendale and California Registers as a single property under Criteria 1 and 1 for its association with the garden apartment trend in the immediate community and in the state.
Glendale Garden Homes has also been identified herein as an outstanding example of an architect-designed, Mid-Century Modern style garden apartment complex in Glendale as well as larger context of California. Character-defining features of the style exhibited in the subject property include single- and two-story building configurations; the demonstrated horizontal design orientation and its separated wing small-scale building massing; the restrained, controlled, geometric decorative forms; the expressed post-and-beam Cabana construction; the low-pitched, gable-on-hip and gabled roofs with deep, overhanging eaves and cantilevered canopies, and nearly flat, overhanging, deep pool building roof; the notably unadorned wall surfaces; its painted redwood, sand-finished plaster, brick, slate and magnesite exterior wall finishes and accent materials; the flush-mounted metal framed fixed windows and sliding doors; the protected exterior staircases, decks, patios and balconies and the limited exterior decorative detailing. The property is individually eligible for listing in the California and Glendale Registers under Criteria 3 and 3 based on its architectural significance.
*B12. References: Continued from page 2
________. "Building Outlay In Glendale.: Valuation Is Four Hundred Thousand For Year; Glendale Experiencing Unprecedented Activity In Construction Improvement of Verdugo Road Is Nearing Completion--New Railway Taking Shape." Los Angeles Times. September 15, 1912.
------------. “Growing interest in Glendale’s Modernist Multifamily Residences Motivates the City to Study their Historic Context” The Glendale Historical Society Newsletter. Summer/Fall 2003.
Louise Causey death notice. Los Angeles Times. September 7, 2010. ________. Los Angeles Times. “In Glendale” May 19, 1957a. ________. “Schools Train Tree Planters: Los Angeles Develops New Course in Curriculum Reforestation Popular Class in All Grades Grounds Beautified Through Efforts of Pupils” Los Angeles Times. February 12, 1928. ________. Southern California Plasterer. Volume 32. 1956. ________. "Tree Planting To Be Resumed: Schools Will Continue Work November 1, Next And Beauty Sought For City's Children Most Popular, With Cypress Next." Los Angeles Times. September 21, 1927. ________. “75 Percent of Glendale Project Occupied” Los Angeles Times. March 23, 1958b.
Ames, David, and Linda Flint McClelland. " National Register Bulletin: Historic Residential Suburbs: Guidelines For Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places.". (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, National Register of Historic Places). 2002.
Bailey, Terry. “Glendale Garden Homes Report Full of Contradictions” Glendale News-Press. September 28, 2004a.
Bailey, Terry. “News from the Preservation Advocacy Front: Saving Glendale Garden Homes” The Glendale Historical Society Newsletter. Summer/Fall 2004b.
Chronicle Heritage, Peer Review Historic Assessment, July 5, 2024.ifornia, State of. License Search. California Architects Board. 2024.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary # UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#
*Recorded by: F. Smith *Date: January 28, 2025 Continuation Update *B12. References: Continued from page 21
The Cultural Landscape Foundation. “Greater Visibility for Los Angeles Garden Apartments” 2023 at https://www.tclf.org/news/features/greater-visibility-los-angeles-garden-apartments last accessed on August 4, 2023. display ad. Los Angeles Times. January 4, 1958a.
Elvin, Charles A. and Max Bindheim, editors. Women of the West: A Series of Biographical Sketches of Living Eminent Women in the Eleven Western States of the United States of America. (unknown: Publishers Press) 1928.
EP Associates. “Historic Assessment Glendale Garden Homes, 1303, 1311 and 1315 N. Central Avenue, Glendale” August 30, 2004.
Engineering News & Record. Volume 98, 1957.
Environmental Science Associates (ESA), Historic Resource Assessment, June 2019.
Falletta, Liz. By-Right, By-Design: Housing Development Versus Housing Design in Los Angeles. (United States: Taylor & Francis), 2019.
Glendale City Directory. (Monterey Park: R.L. Polk and Co.) 1958 and 1971.
Glendale City Directory 1989-1990. (Glendale: Arnold Advertising, Inc.) 1989.
Glendale, City of. Redevelopment Agency of. “Verdugo Gardens Draft Environmental Impact Report” 2007 at https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2517431/verdugo-gardens-draft-environmental-impact-report/3540402/ accessed on November 19 2023.
Glendale, City of. “South Glendale Community Plan, Appendix G- South Glendale Historic Resource Survey” 2018a.
Glendale. City of. “South Glendale Community Plan, Appendix J- South Glendale Historic Context Statement” 2018b.
Glendale, City of. various building permits.
Kim, Karen S. “The Greggs Have Long History of Building in Glendale” Glendale News-Press. December 26, 2002.
Los Angeles Conservancy. Garden Apartments of Los Angeles Historic Context Statement. 2012.
Los Angeles, County of. Tax Assessor, Assessor’s Map 5675 Book 6, Sheet 1, last revised February 8, 1964.
Los Angeles, County of. Tax Assessor, various records by date.
Los Angeles City School District. Directory of the Personnel of the Los Angeles Elementary and High School Districts for 1924-1925. 1924.
McGinnis, Camryn. “Balancing Private and Public Interests in Historic Preservation: It May Be Constitutional, But Is It Right?” The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. Volume 35, Issue 4, 2022.
McKinley & Associates. “Arborist Tree Report” September 4, 2020.
Nilsson, Jeff. “Post Perspective: Air Conditioning: From Luxury to Necessity” Saturday Evening Post. July 31, 2010.
Pruett, Cassandra AICP, Senior Planner, City of Glendale. E-mail message regarding 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue to Francesca Smith and Kasey Conley. July 10, 2024.
Parcher, Caroll W. and George S. Goshorn. Glendale Community Book. (Glendale: John W. Akers) 1957.
Platt, Jay, Principal Planner, City of Glendale. E-mail message to Francesca Smith, August 8, 2023.
Pasadena, City of. “California Historical Resources Inventory Database” 2023. Accessed on various dates at https://pasadena.cfwebtools.com/search.cfm.
University of Southern California. ”Circular of Information” (Los Angeles: no publisher) 1925.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
Experience Principal Architectural Historian State of California 2011-retired December 2023 As subject-matter expert and professionally qualified staff to a state agency, responsible for built environment review of federal, state and local assistance projects in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. Acted on behalf of Federal Highways Administration under First Amended Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration, The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, The California State Historic Preservation Officer, And The California Department Of Transportation Regarding Compliance With Section 106 of The National Historic Preservation Act, As It Pertains To The Administration of The Federal-Aid Highway Program In California. Prepared determinations of National Register eligibility, analyzed project effects, identifies mitigation measures and prepared agreement documents for federal, state, capital and local projects. Reviewed and approved consultants’ work for conformance with above-referenced Programmatic Agreement and coordinated with State Historic Preservation Officer and staff. Reviewed all alterations to and maintenance for more than 100 state-owned historic properties. Senior Architectural Historian various private consulting firms 1990-1997 and 2000-2011 Prepared built environment environmental review, including complex Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Impact Reports (EIS and EIRs) and technical documents for various projects to comply with federal, state and local requirements for projects undertaken by public agencies and private developers. Successful Section 106, National Environmental Policy Act and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review required management of effective cooperation among junior staff and outside consultants, including transit and transportation, energy, and public works projects. Numerous projects required analysis for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Treatment (Standards) and or with local design guidelines. Prepared evaluations of historic significance, analyze effects of complex projects for Section 106 clearance, impacts for CEQA conformance, and recommended mitigation measures to avoid or reduce effects (federal) or impacts (state projects). Prepared draft Memoranda of Agreement and Programmatic Agreements. For Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), prepared evaluations for significance and analyzed project-related effects. Reviewed other consultants’ and disciplines’ work for compliance with requirements in CEQA. Acted as lead on numerous successful certified (tax credit) rehabilitations with developers, architects and engineers and contractors, including limited construction management, completing more than 400 new residential units. Worked closely with building departments and fire-life safety reviewers, using the California Historical Building Code, to meet project goals and achieve code consistency. Performed design review, prepared and presented staff reports for review by cities of Beverly Hills, Carmel, Monterey, Orange and Vallejo.
Mills Act Manager, Specialized Historic Preservation Planner Cities of Los Angeles and Pasadena 1997- 2000 Coordinated and oversaw review of new construction as well as historic preservation projects. Prepared and presented complex analyses for staff and City Manager reports, including graphics, as staff to Design and Cultural Heritage commissions as well as City Council. Managed public counters with other planners, assisted the public and performed plan check including design review for conformance with local design guidelines and Standards. Performed sign review for central district, Old Pasadena and oversaw City of Gardens (multi-family residential) design review, from plan check through issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Prepared Requests for Proposals and managed contract administration of consultants for successful Certified Local Government Grant projects. Helped establish Pasadena’s and managed successful, growing Mills Act program in Los Angeles including coordination with County Assessor and property owners.
Education M.S. Real Estate Development (historic preservation focus), Columbia University, New York 1986 Master’s Thesis- “Redevelopment of Grand Central Market, Los Angeles.” Completed requirements for historic preservation master’s program concurrently. B.A. Political Science (architectural history emphasis), The College of Charleston, South Carolina 1981 Supplemental Experience The Glendale Historical Society, Advisory Council member. City of Glendale, Design Review Board, former member. California Preservation Foundation, Los Angeles Conservancy, National Trust for Historic Preservation, TGHS,* Society of Architectural Historians-Southern California Chapter,* Pasadena Heritage* and Los Angeles City Historical Society- member, former member of Boards of Directors (*). TGHS Advocacy efforts received Los Angeles Conservancy Preservation Award in 2020. Lecturer and teaching assistant, UCLA Extension courses: history, “Undiscovered Los Angeles: Water & Steel” (1997 and 2001); “Historic Preservation- State of the Art” (1997) and Construction Management (1995 and 1996) and USC: historic preservation documentation (2011). Wells Fargo Realty Advisors, Analyst Officer, 1988-1990. Private real estate development, Project Engineer or Project Manager, 1986-1988. Responsible for development of more than 1.5 million square feet of medical-related, office and retail buildings. Reader: Huntington Library and Library of Congress.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
2 Partial List of Publications and Reports All projects consisted of preparation of Cultural Resources sections and technical reports in Los Angeles, California, unless otherwise noted.
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
West Santa Ana Branch, Transportation Corridor. Los Angeles County Transportation Administration (Metro), 2023. Reviewer for Cultural Resources effects and impacts.
Interstates 105 and 110, ExpressLanes. Caltrans District 7, 2023.
Interstate 110 Flyover. Caltrans District 7, 2021.
Crenshaw LAX Transit Project. Metro 2008, 2010. Prepared Preliminary Environmental Assessment and built environment identification.
Reviewed preliminary analyses of effects and impacts.
Regional Connector. Metro and CDM, 2010. Prepared alternatives analysis and draft built environment cultural resources sections for complex downtown transit project with multiple alternatives.
State Route 180 (Fresno, CA). Caltrans District 6, 2008. Peer-reviewed historic resources and community impact sections.
Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor (Salt Lake County, UT). Utah Transit Authority, 2006. Peer-reviewed parklands and open space, Section 4 (f), and historic resources sections, as well as Determination of Eligibility and Finding of Effects.
Conrail Railroad Acquisition by Norfolk Southern Railroad and CSX. Surface Transportation Board (STB), 1997-98. Prepared Section 106 compliance for nationwide railroad merger in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Tennessee and West Virginia.
DART North Central Corridor LRT Extension, with Finding of Effect and Agreement-Based Determination of No Adverse Effect (Dallas, TX).
Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), Federal Transit Administration, (FTA), 1997.
Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs)
Imperial Hardware (Riverside, CA). City of Riverside, 2011.
Riverside Central Library (Riverside, CA). City of Riverside, 2011.
Stone Boat Yard (Alameda, CA). City of Alameda, 2011.
South of Market (SoMa) Specific Plan (San Francisco, CA) City and County of San Francisco, 2011.
First & Mission (San Francisco, CA) City and County of San Francisco, 2011.
East Los Angeles College Satellite Campus Project (South Gate, CA). Los Angeles Community College District and TAHA, 2009. Prepared built environment identification and analyses of effects. Add-on work included participation in Master Plan team.
Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) New School Construction Program, Program EIR Exemptions. LAUSD, 2005.
Central Los Angeles Area New Learning Center #1 (Ambassador Hotel site). LAUSD, June 2003.
Creekside Center Project (Arroyo Grande, CA). City of Arroyo Grande, 2003. Additional impacts analysis 2004. 9th & Flower, South Park Mixed-Use Development (draft, final and two addenda). CIM Group and CRA, 2002, 2004 and 2005.
Palladium Project (San José, CA). Reviewer, San José Redevelopment Agency (SJRDA) 2002.
Los Angeles Central Area High School #9. LAUSD 2001.
Los Angeles Central Area High School #2. LAUSD 2002.
Maranatha High School (Sierra Madre, CA). (Reviewer) City of Sierra Madre, Dorn-Platz Realty. 2001.
University of California at Irvine Medical Center (Orange, CA). Bonterra Consulting, 2001.
Long Beach Naval Shipyard (Roosevelt Island). City and Port of Long Beach, 1998.
Adelante Eastside Redevelopment Project (draft). CRA, 1997.
Barham Cahuenga Improvement Project, In Los Angeles County (including Historic Resource Evaluation Report). City and County of Los Angeles, City of Burbank, Caltrans District 7, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 1997.
The Grand (Lindon) Hotel Project. City of Beverly Hills, 1996.
Broadway State Office Building. California State Department of General Services, 1996.
Received Los Angeles Conservancy Preservation Award in 2000.
South Central Revitalization Project. CRA, 1995.
East Central Interceptor Sewer. City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering, 1995.
California Museum of Science & Industry. State of California Department of General Services. 1993.
Playa Vista. Maguire Thomas Partners, City of Los Angeles, 1991. Prepared built environment cultural resources technical report focused on Hughes Aircraft Factory.
Environmental Impact Statements/Environmental Impact Reports (EIS/EIRs) 710 North. Metro and Caltrans, 2017. Cultural Resources reviewer.
Alameda Corridor Transportation Project. Alameda Corridor Authority, 2006. Prepared Section 106 compliance, evaluating bridges for historic significance as part of a regionally significant railroad project.
Mid-City Red Line Extension. Metro, FTA. 1995.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
3 Mission Valley East Transit Improvements Project (Mission Valley, CA). Metropolitan (San Diego) Transit Development Board, FTA, 1995.
Environmental Assessments (EAs)
Interstate 105 ExpressLanes Project. Metro and Caltrans 2020 and 2022. Prepared Section 106 and CEQA compliance for alterations to historically significant freeway. Prepared Finding of Effect and Supplemental Findings of Effect as well as all built environment technical reports.
State Route 14/Avenue N Interchange Improvements Project. City of Palmdale, Caltrans District 7, 2020. Prepared built environment review for Finding of No Significant Impact.
Sbx E Street Corridor (San Bernardino, CA). Omnitrans and Parsons, 2009. Prepared Cultural Resources technical reports and EA section for bus rapid transit project.
Interstate-15 Improvements, Sloan Road to Tropicana Boulevard (Las Vegas and Clark County, NV). Nevada Department of Transportation, 2009.
Evaluation of seven parcels (San José, CA). San José Redevelopment Agency (SJRDA), 2002.
Hudson Apartments- 290 North Hudson Avenue (Pasadena, CA). City of Pasadena. 2000. Prepared complete initial environmental study for 140-unit apartment project.
Meridian Court- 591 South Marengo Avenue (Pasadena, CA). City of Pasadena. 1999. Prepared cultural resources section for initial environmental study of 10-unit condominium project, immediately adjacent to Wallace Neff’s former office (b. 1926) including demolition of two residences constructed in 1910s.
Palm Court- 214 South Madison Avenue (Pasadena, CA). City of Pasadena. 1999. Prepared complete initial environmental study for 19- unit condominium project, including relocation of Emma Black House, a Greene & Greene-designed residence built in 1908.
Union Pacific/Southern Pacific Railroads Merger. Section 106 compliance for nationwide railroad merger in states of Texas and Colorado, STB, 1997.
McKinney Avenue Trolley Extension (Dallas, TX). City of Dallas, 1997.
DART Northeast Corridor (Dallas, TX). DART, FTA, 1996.
Del Amo Boulevard Overcrossing, In Los Angeles County. City of Carson, Caltrans District 7, FHWA, 1996.
In-Service Engineering Staging Facility and Engineering Lab at Hangar 19, San Diego. US Air Force, 1994.
North Wardlow Station (Long Beach, CA). Metro, FTA, 1993. Prepared initial environmental study for relocation of light rail station to vacant parcel adjacent to residential area.
State Route-68 (Monterey, CA). Prepared complete initial environmental study for conversion of two-lane highway to freeway. FHWA, 1992.
Certified Rehabilitations (Investment Tax Credits)
Southern California Gas Company Complex. Parts 1, 2 and 3. CIM Group, 2006. Recipient of 2004 Los Angeles Downtown News Downtowners of Distinction “Community Financial District” award. 830 South Flower Street Building. Parts 1 and 2. CIM Group, 2006.
Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel. Early Review and Part 1. Goodwin Gaw, 2005. Subject of E! television series entitled “Hotspot.” Far East Café Building. Parts 1, 2, 3 and tenant improvements. Little Tokyo Service Center, Community Development Corporation, current project. Featured and interviewed on HGTV “Saving America’s Treasures” and Recipient of 2004 Los Angeles Conservancy Preservation Award.
Twohy Building (San José). Parts 1, 2, 3 and tenant improvements. CIM Group, 2003. Recipient of 2004 California Preservation Foundation, Preservation Design Award, Rehabilitation & Reuse category.
Brockman Building. Part 1. Sage Hospitality, 2001.
Homer Laughlin Building. Parts 1 and 2. Ira Yellin, 1991.
Culver Hotel (Culver City, CA). Parts 1 and 2. Louis Catlet, 1991.
Engine Co. No. 28. Parts 1, 2 and 3. Linda Griego and Jerry Magnin, 1986.
Reviews for conformance with the Standards
Confidential project originally designed by George Washington Smith with alterations by Cliff May (Santa Barbara County, CA). 2012.
Buchanan Garage (San Francisco, CA). 2011.
Hotel Green, 86 S. Fair Oaks Project. (Pasadena, CA). 2011 and later.
Far Bar (Far East Café/”Chop Suey”). 2011-2017. Reviewed various proposed alterations to National Historic Landmark historic district contributor.
Hugo Reid Adobe (Los Angeles County Arboretum). County of Los Angeles, 2010.
Holiday Bowl Coffee Shop and Majestic Pontiac sign. Axiom Properties, City of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission and Crenshaw Corridor Specific Plan, 2006.
Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel and Spare Room. Goodwin Gaw, CRA and City of Los Angeles Planning Department, 2005, 2009, 2011.
Shakespeare Bridge. City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works. 1999.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
4 California Club. 1999.
Los Angeles Union Station. 1999.
National Historic Landmark and National Register of Historic Places Interstate 105, Century Freeway Transitway. Caltrans District 7 and Metro. Determined eligible for listing in the National Register, listed in the California Register, 2019.
Mission San Gabriel (San Gabriel, CA). Reviewer for Section 106 Mitigation Measure. 2021.
Piedras Blancas Light Station (San Simeon, CA). 2009.
Killingsworth, Brady & Smith Building (Long Beach, CA). KSM Architecture, listed 2009.
General Sedgwick Tower (Bronx, NY). Pro bono project- determined eligible for National Register as the “birth place of hip-hop,” 2007.
Southern California Gas Company Complex. CIM/Flower LLC, three separate buildings listed in National Register 2004.
Twohy Building (San José, CA). CIM/Twohy LLC, listed in National Register 2003.
Sam and Alfreda Maloof Complex (Rancho Cucamonga, CA). Listed in National Register 2010.
Breed Street Schul/Congregation Talmud Torah (Boyle Heights). Listed in National Register 2001.
Warner Grand Theatre (San Pedro, CA). Listed in National Register 1998.
US 101 Cahuenga Pass Freeway. Caltrans District 7. Determined eligible for listing in the National Register, 1997.
Local Landmark and California Register of Historical Resources Applications Neighborhood Congregational Church Laguna Beach, CA). 2024.
Ruth Nelson Taylor House (Laguna Beach, CA). Determined eligible for listing in California Register 2023.
Glendale Civic Auditorium (Glendale, CA). Listed in California Register 2018.
Brockmont Park Historic District (Glendale, CA). Designated local historic district 2014.
Fire Station #21. 1187 East 52nd Street. Designated City of Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument (H-CM) #787 2004.
Southern California Gas Company Complex. CIM Group, designated City of Los Angeles H-CM #789, 2004.
Gans Brothers Building, 814 South Spring Street. Flatiron Development Group, LLC, designated H-CM #737 2002. 141-147 Bay Street- Bay Craftsman Cluster (Santa Monica, CA). Morris Abram and Bill Bridges, designated local historic district 2000.
Garfield Heights Historic District (Pasadena, CA). Designated local historic district 1991.
Historic Property Survey Reports and Historic Resource Evaluation Reports (selected projects) Interstate 105 Crenshaw. Caltrans District 7, 2021.
Interstate 105 Tunnel Lighting Project. Caltrans District 7, 2021.
Interstate 105 Express Lanes Project (Los Angeles County). Metro and Caltrans District 7, 2019.
Interstate 210 Soundwalls (Glendale and Los Angeles County, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2019.
State Route 14 Avenue N Interchange (Palmdale, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2019.
Interstate 5 Freight Corridor (Los Angeles County). Caltrans District 7, 2018.
Interstate 405 Western/Crenshaw (Torrance, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2016.
San Gabriel Walnut Intersection (San Gabriel, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2014.
Interstate 5 Silverbow to Orr & Day Road (Norwalk, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2012.
Hollywood Crossroads Transit Corridor. CRA, CDM, 2010.
Twin Cities Road/Route 99 Interchange Modification Project (Galt, CA). Caltrans District 3, 2010.
Sunset Avenue Grade Separation Project (Banning, CA). Caltrans District 8, 2010.
North Fort Bragg Coastal Trail (Fort Bragg, CA). Caltrans District 5, 2010.
Hollister Avenue Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project (Goleta, CA). Evaluated 1880s-era railroad bridge for historic significance. Caltrans District 5. 2010.
Nogales Street Grade Separation and Gale Avenue/Walnut Drive Widening Project (City of Industry, CA). ACE, Caltrans District 7, 2009. 6th Street Viaduct Improvements Project. Caltrans District 7, 2007.
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Bike Trail Project for the City of Fontana. Also prepared Finding of Effect. Caltrans District 8, 2009.
US 101 Del Norte Overcrossing, In Ventura County. City of Oxnard, Caltrans District 7, 2007.
US 101/Wendy Drive Interchange Improvement Project (Newberry Park, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2007.
State Route-57 Widening, Cities of Placentia, Fullerton and Brea, In Orange County. Bonterra Consulting, Caltrans District 12, 2006.
State Route-118 Widening Between Spring Road and Moorpark Avenue, In Ventura County. City of Moorpark, Caltrans District 7, 2006.
Santiago Creek Bicycle Trail Bridge. Responsible for preparation of Archaeological Survey Report as well. City of Orange, Caltrans District 12, 2005.
Santiago Creek Bicycle Trail. City of Orange, Caltrans District 12, Bonterra Consulting, 2002.
Sepulveda Boulevard Overcrossing at Alameda Street, In Los Angeles County. City of Carson, Caltrans District 7, FHWA, 1996.
Orange Show Road Extension, San Bernardino, California. City of San Bernardino, Caltrans District 8, FHWA, 1995.
Interstate 10 Between Baldwin Avenue and Interstate-605, In Los Angeles County (Segment 1). NegDec/FONSI. Caltrans District 7, FHWA, 1993.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
5 Interstate 10 Between Puente and Citrus Avenues, In Los Angeles County (Segment 2). Caltrans District 7, FHWA, 1995.
Interstate 10 Between Citrus Avenue and Routes 57, 71 and 210, In Los Angeles County (Segment 3). Caltrans District 7, FHWA, 1994.
Interstate 10 Between State Route 57/Interstate-210 and The Los Angeles/San Bernardino County Lines and Interstate-15, In Los Angeles County (Segment 4A). NegDec/FONSI. Caltrans District 7, FHWA, 1993.
Interstate 10 Between The Los Angeles/San Bernardino County Lines and Interstate-15, In San Bernardino County (Segment 4B). San Bernardino County Associated Governments, Caltrans District 8, FHWA, 1993.
Proposed Widening of Interstate-Route 15 and Reconstruction of The 15/40 Interchange, From Lenwood Road to East Main Street, Barstow, In San Bernardino County. NegDec/FONSI. Caltrans District 8, Nevada Department of Transportation, FHWA, 1994.
Interstate 10/Monterey Avenue Overcrossing. City of Palm Desert, Caltrans District 11, FHWA, 1992.
State Route-120 Oakdale Bypass Interchange Improvement Project, In Stanislaus County. Caltrans District 10, FHWA, 1993.
Historic Assessments
Confidential projects (5 buildings). Major university, 2011.
Confidential project. Housing Corporation for the City of Los Angeles, 2011.
Piedras Blancas Light Station (San Simeon, CA). Piedras Blancas Light Station Board of Directors, 2010.
Cultural Resources Technical Report For Mammoth Crossing Project (Mono County, CA). City of Mammoth, 2009.
Addendum To The Cultural Resources Assessment For The Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension Project (Corona, CA). 2009.
Archaeological Survey, Evaluation And Eligibility Investigation For Three Bedrock Milling Feature Sites (unincorporated San Diego County, CA). Stonemark Estates, 2010.
Preliminary Cultural Resources Survey For Formation of the Wiseburn Unified School District Project (El Segundo, Hawthorne and unincorporated Los Angeles County, CA). TAHA, 2008.
Proposed South Region Elementary School No. 9 Project (South Gate, CA). Cultural Resources Initial Technical Report and Phase I Site Investigation, Intensive Survey. LAUSD 2008.
Proposed South Region Middle School No. 3 Project (Walnut Park, CA). Cultural Resources Initial Technical Report and Phase I Site Investigation, Intensive Survey, LAUSD 2008.
Class III Cultural Resources Inventory For Border Fuel Break Project (San Diego County, CA). Bureau of Land Management, 2008.
Foster’s Old Fashion Freeze Property- 590 Marsh Street (San Luis Obispo, CA). City of San Luis Obispo, 2008.
Thomas Roads Improvements Projects (Bakersfield, CA). Built Environment Historic Context Statement, 2008. 10757 - 10763½ Wilkins Avenue. Weston Benshoof Rochefort Rubalcava & MacCuish, LLP, 2003.
Strick Residence- 1911 La Mesa Drive (Santa Monica, CA). Evaluation of single-family residence attributed to Oscar Neimeyer for historic significance. Property is only known example in the United States credited to the noted Brazilian architect. Harding, Larmore, Kozal & Kutcher, 2002.
Fire Station #21 – Southeast Los Angeles (1162-1192 East 51st Street and 1165-1187 East 52nd Street) City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering, 2002. Designated a City Historic-Cultural Monument as a result of identification 2004.
Fire Station #65 (9912, 9916 and 9920 Holmes Avenue, 1807, 1811 and 1825 East Century Boulevard and 9909 and 9917 Bandera Street, Watts) City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering, 2002. 666 South Bonnie Brae Street. CRA, 2002.
Star Court-1951-1959 Beachwood Drive (Hollywood, CA). City of Los Angeles, CFF Properties, 2002.
Broad Street Mixed-Use Project (San Luis Obispo, CA). City of San Luis Obispo, Oasis Landscape Architecture & Planning (Oasis), 2002.
Walnut-Toro Properties (San Luis Obispo, CA). City of San Luis Obispo, Oasis, 2002.
Phase I: El Encanto Hotel- 1900 Lassuen Road (Santa Barbara, CA). City of Santa Barbara, with Alexandra Cole, TynanGroup, 2002.
Hillview Apartments- 6807 Hollywood Boulevard (Hollywood). CRA, Millennium Holdings, 2001.
Automobile Club of Southern California, Hollywood Branch Office/Liberty Records- 6902 Sunset Boulevard (Hollywood). CRA, Reliable Properties, 2001.
Gas Station Building- 11757 East Hadley Street (Whittier, CA). City of Whittier, Whittier Redevelopment Agency, Melvyn Green & Associates, Inc., 2001.
Esperion Duarte/Dream Theater Building- 693-699 Lighthouse Avenue; Mission Building- 685-691 Lighthouse Avenue and Garnero’s Hector de Smet Bakery- 665 Lighthouse Avenue (Monterey, CA). The Cannery Row Company, City of Monterey, 2001.
Mutual Don Lee Broadcasting/AIDS Project LA- 1313 North Vine Street (Hollywood). CRA, Accord Interests, 2000. 1351-53, 1357-59 South Alvarado Street and 1336-38 South Hoover Street. CRA, 2000.
Bowden Ranch Estates Project (San Luis Obispo, CA). City of San Luis Obispo, Oasis, Bowden Ranch Estates, 2000. 811 El Capitan Way- The Log Cabin (San Luis Obispo, CA). City of San Luis Obispo, Oasis, Covey III, 2000 1230 Montana Avenue- Moeller Murphy Moeller Mortuary (Santa Monica, CA). City of Santa Monica, Damavandi Capital LLC, 2000. 4641 Morro Drive (Woodland Hills, CA). City of Los Angeles, Accord Interests LLC, 2000. 914 Royal Street and 1210 West 30th Street. University of Southern California, 2000. 2600 Wilshire Boulevard- Home Savings of America (Santa Monica, CA). City of Santa Monica, Payless Cellular, Inc., 2000.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
6 Zions German Methodist Episcopal Church (Carson, CA). City of Carson, 1998.
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fé Railroad Yard and Shops (San Bernardino, CA). City of San Bernardino, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, 1993-94.
Major Investment Studies
Los Angeles-Bakersfield High Speed Ground Transportation System. Caltrans, FTA, 1993.
The Corridor. Orange County Transportation Authority, 1996.
Environmental Constraints Analyses
State Route 126 (Ventura County, CA). Caltrans District 7, 2020.
Eastern Bypass (Temecula, CA). Western Riverside Council of Governments, 2007.
Ventura Freeway Aerial Alignment Project Study Report. Metro, 1993.
Santa Monica Boulevard Transit Parkway. Metro, 1993.
Bridge Alterations, Rehabilitations, Relocations, Evaluation of Adjacent New Construction US 101, Barham Boulevard, Mulholland Pilgrimage Way Bridges Alterations and Construction Vibration Monitoring. Caltrans District 7, 2023.
State Route 39, Van Ornum Bridge Alterations. Caltrans District 7, 2021.
Fletcher Drive Bridge Seismic Retrofit. City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering, Department of Public Works, HDR Engineering, Inc., 2002.
Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement. City and Port of Long Beach, Caltrans, 2001.
North Broadway/Buena Vista Viaduct Rehabilitation/Reconstruction (seismic retrofit). City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering, Department of Public Works, 1999.
Olympic Boulevard Bridge Rehabilitation/Reconstruction. City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering, Department of Public Works, 1999.
La Loma Bridge, Evaluation of Historic Significance (Pasadena, CA) Listed in National Register in 2004. 1998.
Duck Creek Bridge Relocation (Dallas, TX). DART, US Army Corps of Engineers, FTA, 1997.
White Rock Creek Bridge Rehabilitation and Adjacent New LRT Bridge (Dallas, TX). DART, FTA, 1997.
Photographic Documentation
State New Elementary School #1 (Huntington Park, CA). LAUSD 2002.
Environmental Compliance For Los Angeles County Rail System (Red Line Eastern Extension). Metro, 1997.
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Headquarters, Union Station. MWD, 1997.
Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record (HABS/HAER) Arroyo Seco Parkway (Pasadena Freeway). HAER No. CA-265. Caltrans District 7, 1999. Provided research and review.
State Exposition Building (Ahmanson Building, California Museum of Science and Industry). HABS No. CA-2608. State of California, National Park Service, 1996.
Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, Master and Preservation Plans Brockton Arcade Design Guidelines (Riverside, CA). City of Riverside, current project.
East Los Angeles College Satellite Campus Project (South Gate, CA). Berliner Architects, 2009.
City of Monterey Design Guidelines, Cannery Row Conservation District. The Cannery Row Company, Monterey Bay Aquarium and City of Monterey, 2004.
Villa Riviera (Long Beach, CA). Villa Riviera Board of Directors, 2001.
Roosevelt Building. John Ash Group, 1991.
Miscellaneous
Co-Executive Producer
Commodore Schuyler Heim Bridge: Spanning Centuries of Progress. High definition, half-hour documentary film, 2015.
Peer Review
Historic Preservation Ordinance (Carmel-By the Sea Municipal Code, Chapter 17.41). City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, 2002.
General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan, Land Use & Community Character Element. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, adopted 2003.
Mills Act (Historical Property Contract) Applications
324 Lawson Place, Glendale. Confidential client, City of Glendale, 2020-present.
Robert R. Blacker House, Pasadena (Greene & Greene, 1907). Confidential client, City of Pasadena, 2003.
Author or Researcher
"Preserving the Birthplace of Hip Hop, 1520 Sedgwick Tower." David Gest, Panorama (University of Pennsylvania School of Design), Spring 2007, Vol. XVI.
“Mail Chutes and Downtown Los Angeles Buildings” Los Angeles City Historical Society Newsletter, October 2003, Volume XXX, Issue 4.
FRANCESCA G. SMITH
7 Sacramento’s Memorial Auditorium: Seven Decades of Memories. Bonnie Snyder and Paula Boghosian. (Sacramento: Sacramento Heritage Press) 1997.
Southern California’s Car Culture Landmarks: A Drive Thru History of the Southland, Automobile Club of Southern California, 2000.
page 1 of 7
FRANCESCA SMITH
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
February 3, 2025
Mayor Elen Asatryan and City Council members
City of Glendale
613 E. Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206
Sent via e-mail
RE: Glendale Garden Homes- 1303-1315 North Central Avenue, EIR Appeal PAPP- 004151-2024, City Council Meeting February 4, 2025
Dear Madam Mayor and Councilmembers:
The applicant’s appeal requesting be excused from preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that would analyze impacts expected be caused by their proposed 149- unit, 6-story project is based on their claim that the property is not historically significant. Their assertion states: “The Site has never been identified in any survey or other City record as containing a historic resource, a conclusion confirmed by multiple qualified experts who thoroughly researched the Site, its history, and applicable standards” (November 7, 2024).1
The City of Glendale, as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) “lead agency” is responsible for exercising its discretion to consider whether or not the property is historically significant (California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 14, Section 15064.1(a)(4)). The lead agency must consider all presented evidence, including professional studies, expert testimony and local knowledge.
It should be noted that the Glendale Garden Homes property has notably been considered on various occasions by Glendale City Council for previous projects for the past two decades, beginning in 2003. At the time, The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS) with its members, with residents of the subject property supported the developer’s first consultant’s finding that Glendale Garden Homes was at the time historically significant (EP Associates 2023). In the local historical non-profit group’s quarterly newsleĴer, there were articles on the subject of garden apartments in Glendale and regarding Glendale Garden Homes. That project was abandoned, but TGHS, the
1 LeĴer to Mayor Elen Asatryan and Members of the Glendale City Council by Daniel Freedman, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP “ Appeal of Community Development’s October 28, 2024 Determination DRB Case No. PDR-003089-2024; PDBP-002015-2023 PEIF-002598-2023 Project Address:
1303-1315 N. Central Avenue” dated November 7, 2024.
page 2 of 7
Los Angeles Conservancy, saveglendalegardens.org and I continue to support the historical significance of the Glendale Garden Homes property with its integral landscaping.
In the “Glendale Garden Homes: City of Glendale Historic Resource Assessment/Peer Review” prepared by the lead agency, the qualified preparer concluded that the subject property is eligible for listing in the Glendale Register of Historic Resources under both associative and design criteria (Criteria 1 and 3, September 2024).2 It need only qualify under one criterion to be considered eligible for local landmark designation. More importantly, the ultimate responsibility for making the decision regarding a property’s historic significance is that of the lead agency. My independent evaluation of Glendale Garden Homes is aĴached for your review as well (AĴachment 1). As you know, I am professionally qualified as an architectural historian under Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61. My CV is appended as well (AĴachment 2).
My objective evaluation supports the evaluation prepared by Jay PlaĴ, your professionally qualified staff. Glendale Garden Homes is eligible for listing the Glendale Register of Historic Resources under both associative and design criteria. It need only qualify under one criterion. Based on this simple fact, I strongly recommend that this appeal be denied, and that you support your staff, the Los Angeles Conservancy, TGHS, save glendalegardens.org, your constituents and the more than 2,800 people (and counting) who have signed the Change.org petition at regarding this project.
Additionally, under CCR, in Title 14, Section 15064 “Determining the Significance of the Environmental Effects Caused by a Project” it directs under (a) (1) that “If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the agency shall prepare a draft EIR.” Furthermore, the same statute declares in the same section “The decision as to whether a project may have one or more significant effects shall be based on substantial evidence in the record of the lead agency” (CCR, Title 14 Section 15064, (f)).
The applicant has known that preparation of an EIR would be required, specifically to analyze the impacts to the historic resource for roughly half of a decade. Their claim that preparation of an EIR focused on historic resources impacts is somehow new information is entirely unfounded. Without an EIR, the city and the public would lose the crucial aspect of local control over the Density Bonus Project.
2 Memo prepared by Jay PlaĴ, Principal Planner for the Community Development Department of the City of Glendale. Mr. PlaĴ meets and exceeds the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History.
page 3 of 7
There are other serious issues with this project application, which are described as briefly as possible in this leĴer.
Project Design
In their current application, the developer has demonstrated a lack of reliability. The City of Glendale Design Review Board provided Preliminary Review and Comments on the proposed project on July 13, 2024. The board’s comments were uncharacteristically strong, prescriptive and reasonably specific. The resubmiĴed Project Pre-Application Form for the project nonetheless states, “This project has addressed the design review feedback… in the following manner” (column 3):
Category DRB Preliminary Review and Comments Applicant
Response
Site
Planning
Increase setbacks along the sides/ northerly and
southerly interior property lines and push massing
toward the center of the project. Within the increased
interior setbacks, add more large trees for a beĴer
buffer.
The location of the proposed pool should be
reconsidered and integrated elsewhere on the
property. Relocate pool away from single-family
homes and closer to interior of site.
The existing property features lush landscaping and
mature trees. Provide more larger shade trees (not
palm trees) and greenery to help replace existing
canopy trees and add hanging plants to the sides of
the building.
The single driveway entry point on Central is a
concern both in terms of traffic and accessibility
during an emergency. Provide more entry points to
lower parking or provide more than one driveway,
such as possibly an exit-only driveway on Viola.
No changes for
Density Bonus
Project.
Massing
and
Scale
Maintain three-story massing around the perimeter
of the building that is beĴer scaled with the
surrounding buildings.
Provide more variation in design detailing and
materials to reduce apparent building massing and
scale. Ensure design detailing and materials are
carried across all project facades.
No changes for
Density Bonus
Project.
page 4 of 7
Category DRB Preliminary Review and Comments Applicant
Response
As proposed, the building volume and massing are
too tall and overbearing for the neighborhood
context. Explore methods of reducing mass and scale
in relation to surrounding properties, including the
following:
Lower the units and utilize more of the courtyard
common open space area on the ground floor for
building area and provide open space within
rooftop decks in order to reduce the overall height
and mass of the building.
The central elevator tower, as viewed on the east,
street-facing elevation, appears too tall and
massive. Relocate and consider ways to soften
height.
Provide site sections/elevations showing how
massing relates to surrounding properties both
north to south, and east to west (and across
Central Avenue).
Design
Detail
Provide more variation in design detailing and
materials to reduce apparent building massing and
scale. Ensure design detailing and materials are
carried across all project facades.
Color changes as
suggested by
Design Review
Board.
DRB Decision leĴer, July 13, 2024.
In resubmiĴing without making any of the recommended revisions, the developer has demonstrated their absolute lack of trustworthiness by not addressing the Design Review Board’s direction in their latest application and revised design. More surprising than the applicant’s defiant unwillingness to accept the DRB recommendation and comments, the project has been expanded from 131 units to 149 units since it was reviewed and received comments from the board. The only “concession” made, was changing proposed paint colors. That issue was so inconsequential that it was not recorded in the minutes or the decision leĴer.
I submiĴed a leĴer outlining the historic significance of Glendale Garden Homes property at the time as well.
Traffic
The applicant has likewise proven themselves to be not-quite-truthful in their “Trip Generation/Trip Distribution Memos” dated various years as the project has grown page 5 of 7
incrmentally (Jano Baghdanian, JB & Associates). Part of the city’s response to an application for this project in 2020 was:
A detailed vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis may be required. Please note, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for transportation analyses recommends VMT as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.
For land use and transportation projects, SB 743-compliant CEQA analysis became mandatory on July 1, 2020. The project applicant should consult with City staff through a scoping meeting before analyzing the project for potential VMT impacts.
An approved Construction Traffic Control plan shall be required for use during project construction. The plan shall identify all traffic control measures, signs, and delineators to be implemented by the construction contractor through the duration of demolition and construction. The plan shall also identify contractor information, hours of construction, construction worker parking information, as well as the proposed haul route (Pastor Casanova, T.E., Principal Traffic Engineer, City of Glendale).
In that response, the city’s engineer notably corrected the consultant’s Net Trip Generation calculations in Project Trip Generation from 49 to 51 (see stable below).
The threshold is 50, and over that number, a detailed vehicle miles traveled analyis of impacts would be required.
The City’s revised calculation below and resulted in 51 PM peak hour net trips generated (last column, boĴom row).
The project plans aĴached to that application as “Cover Sheet” was for 131 units, with no date, and notably listed 310 stalls under “Parking provided,” not 309 parking stalls which was notably used in the calculation, see Figure A (Kamran Tabrizi Architect & Associates. “Metro Art Glendale” cover sheet, TS1, no date). So the calculations at that time were based on a small, but significant, “miscount” that was not reflected in the plans aĴached to that application.
That issue aside, the most recent project submiĴal is for 149 units, with a total of 313 parking stalls listed. A total of 313 units are hich is notably four parking stalls more than were analyzed in the previous application (April 24, 2025). See Figures A and B.
page 6 of 7
Figure A: The proposed Design Review Application includes plans that specify the 310 parking spaces as well. Screenshot of plan cover sheet Parking Information (Kamran Tabrizi Architect & Associates. “Metro Art Glendale” cover sheet, TS1, no date, 149 units, application dated February 6, 2023).
Figure B: The proposed Design Review Application includes plans that specify the 313 parking stall, 4 more than the precious iteration. (Kamran Tabrizi Architect & Associates. “Metro Art Glendale” cover sheet, TS1, no date (same preparer, same project, 149 units, revised application dated September 18, 2024).
While I am not a traffic engineer or even an expert on the subject, and the project architect does not date their numerous iterations of cover sheets, which compounds confusion, it nonetheless is clear that 314, not 309, not 310 parking stalls should be used for the project traffic calulations.
I urgently request that each of you follow staff’s recommendation and do not grant the requested appeal. To do so would green-light their agency to demolish a historic resource without review, when only their consultants beiliev it is not historically significant. It would remove any local control of what transpires in our Jewel City, leaving the developer, who have proven themselves to be untrustworthy regarding
page 7 of 7
design review comments and traffic ans described herein, in charge of what happens in Glendale. Please don’t hand over the keys to our future.
Thanks for the opposrunity to comment. Pleas ensure that this leĴer is invcluded in the project adminstratibve record.
Sincerely yours,
Francesca Smith
Francesca Smith
AĴachments
cc: Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
Susan Brandt-Hawley, Brandt-Hawley Law Group
Cassandra PrueĴ, Senior Planner
Jay PlaĴ, Principal Planner
Andrew Salemian, Los Angeles Conservancy
Taleen Barsoumian,The Glendale Histroical Society
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: van Muyden, Gillian
Cc: Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes Petition to Deny the Appeal Item 9a Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:18:46 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
favicon-114x114.png
Protect North Glendale from a Dangerous Development.pdf GGH Petition- Deny the Appeal All Names.pdf
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Michele DiNardo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 9:02 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Platt, Jay <[email protected]>; Pruett, Cassandra <[email protected]>; Michele DiNardo <[email protected]>; Shant Tokatyan <[email protected]>
Subject: Glendale Garden Homes Petition to Deny the Appeal Item 9a
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear Mayor Asatryan and City Council members:
Attached please find 2,855+ signatures as of 5pm February 3, who have supported a petition regarding the proposed demolition of
Glendale Garden Homes. Deny the appeal that is Item 9.a. on Feb 4 City Council agenda.
Please include this message and the attachments in the project's Administrative record.
We the undersigned residents of the City of Glendale call on City Council to act decisively to preserve our community’s values and uphold the laws that safeguard our rights.
DENY THE APPEAL TO BYPASS CEQA AND REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO PREPARE A FULL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Support the qualified and credentialed Community Development Director’s conclusion, and that of the Los Angeles Conservancy and The Glendale Historical Society, as we do, that Glendale Garden Homes is eligible for listing in the local historic register. The evidence is irrefutable. We implore you to consider the perilous downside of granting this appeal and fast-tracking a project that
threatens to destroy a beloved historic resource,
and, in the wake of the fires, presents a potential evacuation safety risk.
Live Glendale Gardens Petition for an EIR:
Sign the Petition
change.org
Protect Glendale from a Dangerous
Development.
A developer (Central BWB LLC, a BW Brody Company) is planning to demolish the Glendale Garden Homes, a historic apartment complex with 37 naturally affordable family units, 90 mature trees and abundant gardens. In its place, the developer wants to construct a six-story apartment block, more than two times the size of Glendale Bloomingdale’s, with 149 mostly unaffordable units—destroying all existing trees in the process. The project would add at least 315 cars on a two-lane road governed by only a stop sign, threatening severe congestion and forcing traffic onto North Brand and surrounding small neighborhood streets. In an emergency, this could be a death trap.
We need housing. But we need safe housing that enhances and sustains our existing multi-family neighborhoods. And we need housing that supports Glendale’s efforts to increase its tree canopy to fight extreme heat—not housing that turns Glendale into a hot concrete wasteland, destroys our historic resources, and presents a safety risk.
The applicant, (the Brody Company) has filed an appeal to City Council, seeking to overturn our Community Development Director’s commonsense requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to analyze impacts to the neighborhood, historic property, city resources, street traffic, etc. This appeal is not the first example of the applicant's arrogance. After Glendale’s Design Review Board denied an earlier 131-unit proposal, saying “the building volume and massing are too tall and overbearing for the neighborhood context,” the developer had the nerve to come back with a much larger project! Now they want a pass excusing them from State required CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) a critical law that protects neighborhoods from unchecked development. We say NO to their appeal and NO to the project! Sign the petition below to help save Glendale from out of control, neighborhood-destroying development. Please be sure your address is GLENDALE to really help in this fight.
We the undersigned residents of the City of Glendale insist City Council stand for Glendale and the law of California and:
DENY THE APPEAL TO BYPASS CEQA AND REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO PREPARE A FULL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Support the Community Development Director’s conclusion, as we do, that Glendale Garden Homes is eligible for listing in the local historic register. We implore you to consider the perilous downside of granting this appeal and fast-tracking a project that presents a safety risk and threatens to destroy a historic resource and an existing multi-family community.
Additional information: 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue. Project # PDR2209209
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM # Name City State Date
1 Adrienne Grigorian Glendale CA 1/23/2025
2 Adrine safaryan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
3 Adryan Russ Glendale CA 1/26/2025
4 Aggy Ilangezyan glendale CA 1/22/2025
5 Aida Bagumian Glendale CA 12/29/2024
6 aida mikirdich Glendale CA 1/29/2025
7 Aida Reganyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
8 Aida Sarkisian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
9 Aida Sarkissiann Jr Glendale CA 1/6/2025
10 Al Greene Glendale CA 12/29/2024
11 Alan Eames Glendale CA 1/8/2025
12 Alan McKibbin Glendale CA 12/23/2024
13 Alan Ortiz Glendale CA 1/11/2025
14 Alan Zorthian Glendale CA 12/28/2024
15 Alana Mohan Glendale CA 1/24/2025
16 Alanna Sacco Glendale CA 1/10/2025
17 Albeir Alrizk Glendale CA 1/20/2025
18 Alberto Rivas Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/22/2025
19 Aleena Aratoon Glendale CA 1/8/2025
20 Alegria Carr Glendale CA 1/25/2025
21 Alejandro Arreola Glendale CA 1/21/2025
22 Alejandro Hinostroza Glendale CA 1/3/2025
23 Aleksandr Andriyan Glendale CA 1/8/2025
24 Alethea Hsu Glendale CA 1/24/2025
25 Alex Amerri Glendale CA 1/4/2025
26 Alex Begijanian Glendale CA 1/25/2025
27 Alex Carrejo Glendale CA 1/8/2025
28 Alex Napiwocki Glendale CA 1/23/2025
29 Alex Roman Glendale CA 1/19/2025
30 A Sark Glendale CA 1/2/2025
31 a . f. shayne Glendale CA 1/10/2025
32 Aaron Geyer Glendale CA 1/7/2025
33 Aaron Veach Glendale CA 1/23/2025
34 Abbie Bernstein Glendale CA 12/30/2024
35 Abeer Abdulahad Glendale CA 12/31/2024
36 Adam Ghodsi Glendale CA 1/24/2025
37 ADAM SCHWARTZ Glendale CA 12/29/2024
38 adaya Liu Glendale CA 1/11/2025
39 Adrian Mendoza Dominguez Glendale CA 1/21/2025
40 Adriana lewis Glendale CA 12/30/2024
41 Alexandra Grizinski Glendale CA 1/19/2025
42 Alexandra Iurato Glendale CA 1/20/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 43 Alexandra Ruegg Glendale CA 12/24/2024
44 alexandra sandoval Glendale CA 1/11/2025
45 Alexia Edjourian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
46 Alfred Avakyants Glendale CA 1/20/2025
47 Alfredo Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/16/2025
48 Ali Rafi Glendale CA 1/11/2025
49 Ali Sharifi Glendale CA 1/11/2025
50 Ali Torbati Glendale CA 1/27/2025
51 Alice Headley Glendale CA 12/26/2024
52 Alice Kim Glendale CA 1/11/2025
53 Alice Mazmanian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
54 Alice Nguyen Glendale CA 1/6/2025
55 Alicia Schacker Glendale CA 1/11/2025
56 Alina Khachekian Glendale CA 1/29/2025
57 Alina Moradyan Glendale CA 1/19/2025
58 Alisa Kazazian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
59 Alison Brett Glendale CA 1/25/2025
60 Alissa Hernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
61 Alla Goldman Glendale CA 1/27/2025
62 Allan Durham Glendale CA 1/26/2025
63 Allen Dish Glendale CA 1/23/2025
64 Allison Weir Glendale CA 1/3/2025
65 Allison Weir Glendale CA 1/9/2025
66 Alma Miranda Glendale CA 12/24/2024
67 Alma Parker Glendale CA 1/1/2025
68 Alvina Pil Glendale CA 1/19/2025
69 amanda elizarraras Glendale CA 1/23/2025
70 Amanda Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/10/2025
71 Amanda Hasaka Glendale CA 1/8/2025
72 Amanda Hernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
73 Amanda Stephano Glendale CA 1/3/2025
74 Amelia Yessayantz Glendale CA 1/19/2025
75 Amy Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/4/2025
76 Amy Karbelnig Glendale CA 1/2/2025
77 Amy Kim Glendale CA 1/24/2025
78 Amy Meenan Glendale CA 1/25/2025
79 Ana Collisson Glendale CA 1/1/2025
80 Ana Garcia Glendale CA 1/12/2025
81 Ana Gomez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
82 Ana Maria Buendia Glendale CA 1/11/2025
83 Anahid Alexander Zargarian Glendale CA 1/27/2025
84 Anahid Tamazarians Glendale CA 1/6/2025
85 Anahit Azizian Glendale CA 1/8/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 86 Anahit Khachatryan Glendale CA 1/29/2025
87 Anahit Manulyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
88 Anastasia Kouyias Glendale CA 1/23/2025
89 Andrea Cedusky Glendale CA 1/4/2025
90 Andres Fierro Glendale CA 1/20/2025
91 Andres Reyes Glendale CA 1/19/2025
92 Andrew Leerskov Glendale CA 1/28/2025
93 Andrew P Glendale CA 1/5/2025
94 Andrew P Glendale CA 1/28/2025
95 Anet Sepanian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
96 Aneta Ayrapetyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
97 Angel Benitez Glendale CA 1/29/2025
98 Angel Jackson Glendale OR 12/27/2024
99 Angel Treinen Glendale CA 1/4/2025
100 Angela Barsamyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
101 Angela Burdick Glendale CA 1/11/2025
102 Angela Galletta Glendale CA 1/11/2025
103 Angela Pardo Glendale CA 12/29/2024
104 Angelica Bustos Glendale CA 12/30/2024
105 Angelique meshefedjian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
106 Angelo Pacella Glendale CA 12/24/2024
107 Ani Bogosian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
108 Ani Harutyunyan Glendale CA 1/19/2025
109 Anita Danelian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
110 Anita Shenian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
111 Anjel Garabidian Glendale CA 1/21/2025
112 Ann Bilardello Glendale CA 1/4/2025
113 Ann S Glendale CA 1/11/2025
114 Anna Acosta Glendale CA 1/23/2025
115 Anna Baragiola Glendale CA 1/11/2025
116 Anna Chavez Bussjaeger Glendale CA 1/20/2025
117 Anna Leshner Glendale CA 1/22/2025
118 Anna Marie Arredondo Glendale CA 1/10/2025
119 anna schlobohm de cruder Glendale CA 12/23/2024
120 Anna Sew Hoy Glendale CA 1/3/2025
121 Annamarie Brechin Glendale CA 12/23/2024
122 Anne Abraamian Glendale CA 1/22/2025
123 Anne Donley Glendale CA 1/3/2025
124 Anne McDonald Glendale CA 12/29/2024
125 Anne R Glendale CA 1/6/2025
126 Annet Arakelian Glendale CA 1/1/2025
127 Annette Banks Glendale CA 1/19/2025
128 Annie Bahadourian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 129 Anoush Dekmejian Glendale CA 12/28/2024
130 Anthony Ahlers Glendale CA 12/24/2024
131 Anthony Bruce Glendale CA 1/4/2025
132 Anthony DeJoria Glendale CA 12/29/2024
133 Anthony Eng Glendale CA 12/24/2024
134 Anthony Farina Glendale CA 12/24/2024
135 ANTHONY MEGLIORINO Glendale CA 1/17/2025
136 April Gustafsen Glendale CA 1/28/2025
137 Ara Armain Glendale CA 1/10/2025
138 Ara Artinian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
139 Ara Hadidian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
140 Araceli Bustos Glendale CA 1/4/2025
141 Arda Artinian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
142 arek avedian glendale CA 1/20/2025
143 Arely Fuentes Glendale CA 1/11/2025
144 Aren Andreasian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
145 Ariana Martinez Glendale CA 1/26/2025
146 Arin Arian Glendale CA 1/21/2025
147 Arlene Edjourian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
148 Arlene Vidor Glendale CA 12/31/2024
149 Arman Panoosian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
150 Ara Armain Glendale CA 1/10/2025
151 Ara Artinian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
152 Ara Hadidian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
153 Araceli Bustos Glendale CA 1/4/2025
154 Arda Artinian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
155 arek avedian glendale CA 1/20/2025
156 Arely Fuentes Glendale CA 1/11/2025
157 Aren Andreasian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
158 Ariana Martinez Glendale CA 1/26/2025
159 Arin Arian Glendale CA 1/21/2025
160 Arlene Edjourian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
161 Arlene Vidor Glendale CA 12/31/2024
162 Arman Panoosian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
163 Ara Armain Glendale CA 1/10/2025
164 Ara Artinian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
165 Arthur Adams Glendale CA 1/3/2025
166 Artin Khodadadi Glendale CA 1/19/2025
167 Artur Ayrapetyan Glendale CA 1/20/2025
168 Asdghig Mehrabi Glendale CA 1/22/2025
169 Ashkhen Hovsepian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
170 Ashot Djavakhian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
171 Astghik Avetisyan Glendale CA 1/17/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 172 Astghik Sahagian Glendale CA 1/4/2025
173 Audry Zarokian Glendale CA 1/9/2025
174 ayden tran Glendale CA 1/10/2025
175 Ayla Thomassian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
176 Barbara Brunelli Glendale CA 1/7/2025
177 Barbara Jarnes Glendale CA 12/25/2024
178 barbara poland Glendale CA 12/31/2024
179 Barbara Y Bodden Glendale CA 1/7/2025
180 Belen Gonzalez Glendale CA 12/31/2024
181 BELLA NAZARIAN Glendale CA 1/5/2025
182 Bellanira Tiguila Glendale CA 12/31/2024
183 Bernardine Baldwin Glendale CA 12/28/2024
184 Bert De Vito Glendale CA 1/28/2025
185 Beth Brooks Glendale CA 12/24/2024
186 Beth Marlis Glendale CA 12/23/2024
187 Betty Hart Glendale CA 1/7/2025
188 Beverly Jensen Glendale CA 12/26/2024
189 Beverly Klatt Glendale CA 12/28/2024
190 Bjorn Gustafsen Glendale CA 1/28/2025
191 Blanca Puno Glendale CA 1/26/2025
192 Bonnie Hays Glendale CA 12/29/2024
193 Bonnie Hays Glendale CA 1/22/2025
194 Bonnie Koenn Glendale CA 1/7/2025
195 Brad Carlton Glendale CA 12/30/2024
196 Brad Oloughlin Glendale CA 1/23/2025
197 Brandon Hernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
198 Brenda Gant Glendale CA 12/23/2024
199 Brenda Lafosse Glendale CA 12/26/2024
200 Brenda Noj Glendale CA 1/10/2025
201 Brian Dietzen Glendale CA 1/20/2025
202 Brian Dunkleman Glendale CA 1/23/2025
203 Brian Eagen Glendale CA 12/23/2024
204 Brian Hanson Glendale CA 12/31/2024
205 Brian Nguyen Glendale CA 1/19/2025
206 Briant Serra Glendale CA 12/31/2024
207 Brigid McNally Glendale CA 12/24/2024
208 Brooke Dickson Glendale CA 1/8/2025
209 Bruce Merritt Glendale CA 1/19/2025
210 Bruce Tanis Glendale CA 1/22/2025
211 Burton Johnson Glendale CA 12/26/2024
212 Caitlin McWhirt Glendale CA 1/20/2025
213 Candice Piccione Glendale CA 1/7/2025
214 Cari Field Glendale CA 12/26/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 215 Carla Buchanan Glendale CA 1/7/2025
216 Carlo Hakopian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
217 Carlos H Glendale CA 1/11/2025
218 Carlos Sandoval Glendale CA 1/11/2025
219 Carlos Sarabia Glendale CA 1/10/2025
220 Carlos Vasquez Glendale CA 1/22/2025
221 Carly Gumina Glendale CA 1/6/2025
222 carol attarian Glendale CA 1/27/2025
223 Carol Augusta Glendale CA 1/11/2025
224 Carol Freed Glendale CA 1/4/2025
225 Carol Sayles Glendale CA 1/22/2025
226 Carole Antouri Glendale CA 1/3/2025
227 Carole Nedeff Glendale CA 1/19/2025
228 Carolina Loren Glendale CA 1/19/2025
229 Carolina Silva Glendale CA 1/4/2025
230 Carolina Zegarra Glendale CA 1/20/2025
231 Carolyn Beaton Glendale CA 12/24/2024
232 Carolyn De Mirjian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
233 Carolyn Schiers Glendale CA 12/24/2024
234 Cassondra Chaparro Glendale CA 1/8/2025
235 Catherine Beauchamp Glendale CA 1/6/2025
236 Catherine Martinez Glendale CA 1/24/2025
237 cathie price Glendale CA 1/22/2025
238 Cathrine Chambliss Labovsky Glendale CA 1/24/2025
239 Cathy Cope Glendale CA 1/8/2025
240 celine duburg anchen Glendale CA 12/24/2024
241 Celine Marcos Glendale CA 12/26/2024
242 Chadi Moghrabi Glendale CA 1/20/2025
243 Chanda Davetas Glendale CA 1/20/2025
244 Charles Kelly Glendale CA 1/5/2025
245 Charles Plank Glendale CA 12/26/2024
246 Charlotte Younessi Glendale CA 1/21/2025
247 Chase Baker Glendale CA 1/29/2025
248 Chelsea Steinberg Glendale CA 1/9/2025
249 CHERYL FEOLA GLENDALECA 1/22/2025
250 Cheryl McSweeney Glendale CA 1/29/2025
251 China Gerstner Glendale CA 1/26/2025
252 Chris Himes Glendale CA 12/29/2024
253 Chris Jackson Glendale CA 12/30/2024
254 Christa Chilton Glendale CA 1/23/2025
255 Christina Emrey Glendale CA 1/22/2025
256 Christina Rizzo Glendale CA 1/12/2025
257 Christine Hersh Glendale CA 1/19/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 258 Christine Olivarri Glendale CA 12/29/2024
259 Christine Wise Glendale CA 1/22/2025
260 christopher callen Glendale CA 12/26/2024
261 Christopher Girgis Glendale CA 1/8/2025
262 Christy Yaussi Glendale CA 1/7/2025
263 Cindy TenBrook Glendale CA 1/20/2025
264 Clara Gharibian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
265 Clementine Henson Glendale CA 1/9/2025
266 Clifton Adams Glendale CA 1/20/2025
267 Clyde Yeroomian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
268 Coady Humphries Glendale CA 1/8/2025
269 Cody Birdwell Glendale CA 1/20/2025
270 Colton California Glendale CA 1/10/2025
271 Consuelo Serena Velasco Glendale CA 12/24/2024
272 Cosette Luine Glendale CA 1/2/2025
273 Cosmin Ion Balaban Glendale CA 1/23/2025
274 Courtney Reid Glendale CA 1/24/2025
275 Craig Yaussi Glendale CA 1/26/2025
276 Cristina Fernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
277 Crystal Hossainkhail Glendale CA 12/29/2024
278 Crystal Saltmarsh Glendale CA 1/28/2025
279 Cynthi Kent Glendale CA 1/19/2025
280 Cynthia Beres Glendale CA 12/23/2024
281 Cynthia Lopez Glendale CA 1/24/2025
282 Cynthia Shank Glendale CA 1/23/2025
283 Dale Cooke Glendale CA 1/26/2025
284 Damian Sullivan Glendale CA 12/24/2024
285 Damon Brown Glendale CA 1/3/2025
286 Dan Bathker Glendale CA 1/7/2025
287 Dan De Yo Glendale CA 12/30/2024
288 Dan G Glendale CA 12/26/2024
289 Dan LaBreche Glendale CA 12/23/2024
290 Dana Cobb Glendale CA 1/10/2025
291 Dana Doyle Glendale CA 12/23/2024
292 Daniel Davis Glendale CA 1/3/2025
293 Daniel Monreal Glendale CA 1/11/2025
294 Daniel Shakaryan Glendale CA 1/29/2025
295 Daniel Zermeno Glendale CA 1/7/2025
296 dano sass Glendale CA 1/8/2025
297 Dante arakelian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
298 Daphne Wilkinson Glendale CA 1/10/2025
299 Darcy Rubin Glendale CA 12/27/2024
300 Darcy Rubin Glendale CA 12/28/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 301 Darcy Rubin Glendale CA 1/6/2025
302 Darlene Ramirez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
303 Darren Stroughter II Glendale CA 1/29/2025
304 Darryl De Bond Glendale CA 12/29/2024
305 Darryl Deyerle Glendale CA 12/29/2024
306 Dave Child Glendale CA 1/8/2025
307 David Angelo Ghiglieri Glendale CA 12/23/2024
308 David Babikyan Glendale CA 12/23/2024
309 David Baghalian Glendale CA 1/29/2025
310 David Bennett Glendale CA 1/10/2025
311 david bogosian glendale CA 1/29/2025
312 David Broussal Glendale CA 12/30/2024
313 David Chambers Glendale CA 12/23/2024
314 David Dennick Glendale CA 1/25/2025
315 David Diaz Glendale CA 12/27/2024
316 David Jew Glendale CA 12/29/2024
317 David Manoukian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
318 David Marks Glendale CA 1/22/2025
319 David Snow Glendale CA 1/25/2025
320 Dawn Der Avanessian glendale CA 1/24/2025
321 Deanna Antonian Glendale CA 1/8/2025
322 Deborah casanova Glendale CA 1/4/2025
323 Deborah Morrill Glendale CA 1/20/2025
324 Deborah Olson Glendale CA 12/25/2024
325 Debra Mauritson Glendale CA 1/2/2025
326 Denise Capurso Glendale CA 1/12/2025
327 Denise Kruegermann Glendale CA 1/7/2025
328 Desi Jevon Glendale CA 1/5/2025
329 Desiree De Bond Glendale CA 1/20/2025
330 Despina Tsiknas-Arzouman Glendale CA 1/29/2025
331 Devin Baker Glendale CA 1/3/2025
332 Diana Regan Glendale CA 12/24/2024
333 DIANE AMIEL Glendale CA 1/3/2025
334 Diane corrao Glendale CA 1/8/2025
335 Diane Jacobs Glendale CA 12/29/2024
336 Diane McDonald Glendale CA 12/29/2024
337 Diane Mueller Glendale CA 12/30/2024
338 Dolores Machado Glendale CA 12/28/2024
339 Dominique Lopez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
340 Don Snyder Glendale CA 1/26/2025
341 Donald Lendt Glendale CA 1/12/2025
342 Donielle Lemone Glendale CA 1/21/2025
343 Donna Fitzpatrick Glendale CA 12/28/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 344 Donna Houpt Glendale CA 12/23/2024
345 Donna Mills Glendale CA 1/22/2025
346 Donna Sole Glendale CA 1/28/2025
347 Dorene Bennett Glendale CA 1/29/2025
348 Dorothy Black Glendale CA 12/28/2024
349 Dorothy Black Glendale CA 1/19/2025
350 Dorothy Simon Glendale CA 12/24/2024
351 Dorrie Hall Glendale CA 1/1/2025
352 Dr. and Mrs. Scott Greene Glendale CA 1/22/2025
353 Duane Fernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
354 E Sayegh Glendale CA 12/24/2024
355 e waltz Glendale CA 12/30/2024
356 Eamon Mitchell Glendale CA 1/22/2025
357 Ed Steers Glendale CA 1/20/2025
358 Eden Elizalde Glendale CA 12/23/2024
359 Edison Tekmar Glendale CA 12/28/2024
360 Edmund Yamahiro Glendale CA 12/23/2024
361 Edward Coffman Glendale CA 1/10/2025
362 Edward Ornelas Glendale CA 1/22/2025
363 Edwin G Glendale CA 12/31/2024
364 Eileen Rose Glendale CA 12/28/2024
365 Eileen Sanchez Glendale CA 1/9/2025
366 elena bourygina Glendale CA 1/16/2025
367 Elena Galvez Glendale CA 12/24/2024
368 Elisabeth Groening Glendale CA 1/19/2025
369 Elise Kalfayan Glendale CA 1/1/2025
370 Elizabeth Astor Glendale CA 1/28/2025
371 Elizabeth Honda Glendale CA 12/30/2024
372 Elizabeth Lopez Glendale CA 1/20/2025
373 Elizabeth Luce Glendale CA 12/28/2024
374 Elizabeth Stasuc Glendale CA 1/22/2025
375 Ellen Levy Glendale CA 12/30/2024
376 Ellen Reaser-Choi Glendale CA 1/21/2025
377 Elliott Marks Glendale CA 12/30/2024
378 Elsa Tatom Glendale CA 1/22/2025
379 Elvira Bornstein Glendale CA 1/26/2025
380 Emily Dubon Glendale CA 1/10/2025
381 Emily Elliott Glendale CA 1/7/2025
382 Emma Baltazar Glendale CA 12/26/2024
383 Erfin Hartojo Glendale CA 1/6/2025
384 Eric Brownstone Glendale CA 1/20/2025
385 Eric Khachatourian Glendale CA 1/10/2025
386 Eric Lamers Glendale CA 1/11/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 387 Eric Stageberg Glendale CA 1/11/2025
388 Erica Culverhouse Glendale CA 12/24/2024
389 Erica ridge glendale CA 1/26/2025
390 Erica Wilcox Glendale CA 12/24/2024
391 Erik Ghokasian Glendale CA 1/10/2025
392 Erik Zadoorian Glendale CA 12/27/2024
393 Erin Campbell Glendale CA 12/30/2024
394 Erin Escobar Glendale CA 12/26/2024
395 Erin Oglesby Glendale CA 1/23/2025
396 Erwin Lutz Glendale CA 12/24/2024
397 Estela Luizzi Glendale CA 12/24/2024
398 Eunice Baston Glendale CA 12/27/2024
399 Eva Dyan Glendale CA 12/27/2024
400 Eva Garcia Glendale CA 1/27/2025
401 Eva Thielk Glendale CA 1/5/2025
402 eve mekerdichian Glendale CA 1/23/2025
403 Evelyn Stafford Glendale CA 1/21/2025
404 Eyh Yi Glendale CA 1/10/2025
405 Fabian Barajas Glendale CA 12/27/2024
406 Fabiola Gutierrez Glendale CA 1/9/2025
407 fan zhang Glendale CA 1/10/2025
408 Farah Ameri Glendale CA 1/19/2025
409 Faranak Aslemand Glendale CA 1/10/2025
410 Feyruz Christina Defaee Glendale CA 1/11/2025
411 Filibardo Mora Glendale CA 1/26/2025
412 Flo F Glendale 12/28/2024
413 Flora Yeganyan glendale CA 1/9/2025
414 Florence Madani Glendale CA 1/23/2025
415 Francesca Smith Glendale CA 12/23/2024
416 Francesco Catullo Glendale CA 1/10/2025
417 Francisco bello Glendale CA 12/30/2024
418 Francisco Ruiz Glendale CA 1/20/2025
419 frank lujan Glendale CA 1/29/2025
420 Fready Maldonado Glendale CA 1/27/2025
421 Fred Blackwell Glendale CA 1/20/2025
422 Fred Pietrantozzi Glendale OH 1/12/2025
423 Gary Garnick Glendale CA 1/19/2025
424 Gayane Budagyan Glendale CA 1/7/2025
425 Gayane Gevorkyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
426 Gayane Nazarians Glendale CA 1/25/2025
427 Gayane Pettibone Glendale CA 12/28/2024
428 Gema Ortiz Glendale CA 1/25/2025
429 Genae Compagna Glendale CA 12/23/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 430 George Jamgochian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
431 Georgiana Steele-Waller Glendale CA 12/24/2024
432 Geraldine Cragnotti Glendale CA 12/29/2024
433 Gertrudis Vallejo Glendale CA 12/24/2024
434 Gil Hernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
435 gilbert keshish Glendale CA 1/19/2025
436 Ginny Johnston Glendale CA 12/29/2024
437 Giota Bicou Glendale CA 12/30/2024
438 Glen Constantino Glendale CA 12/24/2024
439 Gonny Stevens Glendale CA 12/23/2024
440 Grace Nguyen Glendale CA 1/19/2025
441 Graciela McCarthy Glendale CA 12/27/2024
442 Greg Bayes Glendale CA 1/11/2025
443 greg martin Glendale CA 12/24/2024
444 Greg Ricchiuti Glendale CA 1/24/2025
445 Gregory Ross Glendale CA 12/26/2024
446 Gregory Thieme Glendale CA 1/20/2025
447 Gurgen Bagdasarian Glendale CA 1/29/2025
448 Gurkaran Singh Glendale CA 1/20/2025
449 Hagob Basmajian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
450 Hagop Edjourian Glendale CA 1/8/2025
451 Hai Jiang Glendale CA 1/20/2025
452 Haig Diane Glendale CA 1/19/2025
453 Hannah Howzdy Glendale CA 1/22/2025
454 Hanriet Martirosian Glendale CA 1/29/2025
455 Harlowe kvale Glendale CA 1/24/2025
456 Harold Kalishman Glendale CA 1/7/2025
457 harriett kahan Glendale CA 12/29/2024
458 Harry kazaryan Glendale CA 1/8/2025
459 Harut K Glendale CA 1/19/2025
460 Harutiun Sarkisian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
461 Hasmig Tchakmakjian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
462 Hasmik Tsaturian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
463 HASSAN KHADGHENOORI Glendale CA 1/28/2025
464 Hayk Makhmuryan Glendale CA 1/23/2025
465 Hayley Chilton Glendale CA 12/24/2024
466 Hayley Nelson Glendale CA 12/27/2024
467 Heather Dennis Glendale CA 12/24/2024
468 Heather Graham Glendale CA 1/28/2025
469 Heather Isaac Glendale CA 12/26/2024
470 Heather Wood Glendale CA 12/27/2024
471 Heghine Guldalian Glendale CA 12/28/2024
472 Helen Kirkorian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 473 Henry Agadjanyan Glendale CA 1/19/2025
474 Hermineh Yeghikian Glendale CA 1/26/2025
475 HERMOZ AYVAZIAN GLENDALECA 1/11/2025
476 Heros Bijan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
477 Honey H Glendale CA 1/20/2025
478 Hope Marie Glendale CA 1/26/2025
479 Hovanes Shakaryan Glendale CA 1/29/2025
480 Hrant Achikyan Glendale CA 1/20/2025
481 Hripsik Shatikian Glendale CA 12/25/2024
482 I_frmokc Shack Glendale CA 1/10/2025
483 IAN ELLIOTT Glendale CA 1/7/2025
484 Iliana Parada Glendale CA 1/10/2025
485 Ingrid Mieko Glendale CA 1/10/2025
486 Ingrid Wilcox Glendale CA 12/25/2024
487 Irina Kolef Glendale CA 1/27/2025
488 iris arciniega Glendale CA 1/21/2025
489 Irma Medina Glendale CA 1/28/2025
490 Isabel Martinez-Campos Glendale CA 1/29/2025
491 Izabella Dovlatyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
492 J. Davis Glendale CA 12/29/2024
493 Jack McKee Glendale CA 12/26/2024
494 Jack Sallakian Glendale CA 1/5/2025
495 Jack Sheppeck Glendale CA 1/4/2025
496 Jack Taylor Glendale CA 12/24/2024
497 Jackie Morales Glendale CA 1/22/2025
498 Jackie Mutschler Glendale CA 1/25/2025
499 Jackson Castillo Glendale CA 1/27/2025
500 Jacqueline Leon Glendale CA 1/9/2025
501 Jacqueline Sarkissian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
502 Jaime Marin Glendale CA 12/30/2024
503 Jamelet Rendo Glendale CA 1/20/2025
504 James Clarke Glendale CA 12/24/2024
505 James King Glendale CA 12/30/2024
506 james malina Glendale CA 12/23/2024
507 James Powers Glendale CA 12/23/2024
508 JAMES SHAW Glendale CA 1/19/2025
509 Jamie Dufault Glendale CA 12/29/2024
510 Jane Blissert Glendale CA 1/7/2025
511 Jane Daugherty Glendale CA 12/24/2024
512 Jane Fink Glendale CA 12/29/2024
513 Jane Pog Glendale CA 12/24/2024
514 Janet Borrus Glendale CA 1/20/2025
515 Janet Martin-Gies Glendale CA 1/26/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 516 Janet Paijuk Glendale CA 12/25/2024
517 Janet Setaghaian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
518 Janet Weaver Glendale CA 1/24/2025
519 Janey Kapell Glendale CA 12/28/2024
520 Janice Okuda Glendale CA 1/3/2025
521 Janine Smice Glendale CA 1/26/2025
522 Jason Morgado Glendale CA 1/3/2025
523 JASON SHELOWITZ Glendale CA 1/5/2025
524 Jason Skiano Glendale CA 1/4/2025
525 Javier Garcia Glendale CA 1/11/2025
526 Jean Yaussi Glendale CA 1/27/2025
527 Jeanne Finley Glendale CA 1/29/2025
528 Jeff Ludovico Glendale CA 1/27/2025
529 Jeff MacClay Glendale CA 12/29/2024
530 Jeff Olmstead Glendale CA 1/8/2025
531 Jeff Shuman Glendale CA 1/7/2025
532 Jeff Yesko Glendale CA 12/30/2024
533 Jeffrey Morgenroth Glendale CA 12/24/2024
534 Jeffrey Vollmer Glendale CA 1/27/2025
535 Jen Jime Glendale CA 12/23/2024
536 Jenni Wilson Glendale CA 1/25/2025
537 Jennifer Cubillas Glendale CA 1/22/2025
538 Jennifer Fitzpatrick Glendale CA 12/24/2024
539 Jennifer Jimenez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
540 Jennifer Jordison Glendale CA 1/7/2025
541 Jennifer Levin Glendale CA 12/23/2024
542 Jennifer Romero Glendale CA 1/6/2025
543 Jennifer Smith Glendale CA 1/9/2025
544 Jeremy Costello Glendale CA 1/25/2025
545 Jerilynn Serpico Glendale CA 1/10/2025
546 Jessalyn Chou Lee - West Glendale CA 1/10/2025
547 Jesse Rodriguez Glendale WI 1/12/2025
548 Jessica Fraijo Glendale CA 12/31/2024
549 Jessica Hill Glendale CA 12/29/2024
550 JESUS A. CHAVEZ Glendale CA 12/29/2024
551 Jill Yensen Glendale CA 1/7/2025
552 Jillian Simonett Glendale CA 1/26/2025
553 Jim Bevacqua Glendale CA 1/3/2025
554 Jin Yuan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
555 Jo Kenney Glendale CA 1/7/2025
556 Joan Anderson Glendale CA 1/24/2025
557 Joan Hardie Glendale CA 1/7/2025
558 Joan Klaric Glendale CA 1/3/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 559 Joan Marcewicz Heverly Glendale CA 1/24/2025
560 Joan Smith Glendale CA 1/24/2025
561 Joanie Munro Glendale CA 12/30/2024
562 Joanna Hess Glendale CA 1/3/2025
563 Joanna Pringle Glendale CA 12/27/2024
564 Joanna Scott Glendale CA 12/23/2024
565 Jocelyn Flores Glendale CA 1/11/2025
566 Jody Scott Glendale CA 12/30/2024
567 Joe Conway Glendale CA 12/24/2024
568 joel zavala Glendale CA 1/10/2025
569 Joemy Wilson Glendale CA 1/23/2025
570 John Arangio Glendale CA 12/26/2024
571 John Donovan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
572 John Dunne Glendale CA 1/7/2025
573 JOhn Guldalian Glendale CA 12/28/2024
574 John McCarty Glendale CA 1/3/2025
575 John Murphy Glendale CA 12/31/2024
576 John Schuning Glendale CA 12/23/2024
577 John Tyler Glendale CA 1/21/2025
578 Johnny Parco Glendale CA 1/23/2025
579 Johnny Rodriguez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
580 Johnny Tchaprazian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
581 Jonathan Crook Glendale CA 1/6/2025
582 Jonathan Osor Glendale CA 12/29/2024
583 Jonathan Salvador Glendale CA 1/2/2025
584 Jonathan Tachibana Glendale CA 1/4/2025
585 Jonathan Tiu Glendale CA 12/29/2024
586 Jorge Guerrero Glendale CA 12/29/2024
587 Jose Castaneda Glendale CA 1/10/2025
588 Jose Miranda Glendale CA 1/3/2025
589 Jose Ortiz Glendale CA 1/4/2025
590 Joseph Aguilar Glendale CA 1/10/2025
591 Joseph Albert Glendale CA 12/23/2024
592 Josette Banks Glendale CA 1/10/2025
593 Josh Taylor Glendale CA 12/24/2024
594 Joshua Jacobs Glendale CA 12/29/2024
595 Joy Boyajian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
596 Joy McCann Glendale CA 1/19/2025
597 Joyce Newman Glendale CA 12/31/2024
598 Juan Jimenez Glendale CA 12/24/2024
599 Juan Nunez Glendale CA 12/31/2024
600 Judith Froelich-Rao Glendale CA 12/29/2024
601 Judy HERNAND Glendale CA 1/7/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 602 Judy Schlegel Glendale CA 12/27/2024
603 Julia Prescott Glendale CA 1/8/2025
604 Julian Sarkisov Glendale CA 1/17/2025
605 Julie Arko Glendale CA 12/24/2024
606 Julie Kim Glendale CA 1/21/2025
607 Julie Wise Bastin Glendale CA 1/7/2025
608 Julie Zimmerer Glendale CA 1/10/2025
609 Juliette Sedlacek Glendale CA 12/23/2024
610 June Harton Glendale CA 1/7/2025
611 Juno Ellis Glendale CA 12/30/2024
612 Justin Benore Glendale CA 1/10/2025
613 Kaitlyn Lopez Glendale CA 1/29/2025
614 Kamyar Badii Glendale CA 1/9/2025
615 Karen Betzold Glendale CA 1/23/2025
616 Karen Gutfeld Glendale CA 12/23/2024
617 Karen Okey Glendale CA 1/20/2025
618 Karen Slayton Glendale CA 1/7/2025
619 Karen Wadler Glendale CA 1/8/2025
620 Kari Druyen Glendale CA 1/7/2025
621 Karin Costa Glendale CA 12/29/2024
622 Karin Iranpanah Glendale CA 12/23/2024
623 Karin Romp Glendale CA 12/28/2024
624 Karina Zartarian Glendale CA 12/27/2024
625 Karmine Jumaze Glendale MN 12/26/2024
626 Katerin Khachikyan Glendale CA 1/1/2025
627 Kathleen Boss Glendale CA 1/1/2025
628 Kathleen Clark Glendale CA 12/24/2024
629 Kathleen Middlebrooks Glendale CA 12/27/2024
630 Kathleen Peiris Glendale CA 12/25/2024
631 Kathy Fortner Glendale CA 1/17/2025
632 Kathy Hughes Glendale CA 12/24/2024
633 Kathy Jones Glendale CA 12/26/2024
634 Kati Prescott Glendale CA 1/4/2025
635 Katie Emery Glendale CA 1/23/2025
636 Katie Robinson Glendale CA 1/26/2025
637 Katrin Asanoori Glendale CA 1/10/2025
638 Keith Morris Glendale CA 1/3/2025
639 Kelly Baker Glendale CA 1/29/2025
640 Kelly Coba Glendale CA 1/26/2025
641 Kelly Henderson Glendale CA 1/10/2025
642 kelly johnson Glendale CA 12/26/2024
643 Kelly Martin Glendale CA 1/24/2025
644 Kelly Ramirez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 645 Ken Odom Glendale CA 1/20/2025
646 Kent Culotta Glendale CA 12/28/2024
647 Kerri B Glendale CA 1/7/2025
648 Keven Scotti Glendale CA 12/26/2024
649 Kevin Edgecomb Glendale CA 1/22/2025
650 Keyry Cid Glendale CA 12/27/2024
651 Khalil Armani Glendale CA 1/9/2025
652 Kim Chavez Glendale CA 1/22/2025
653 Kim Henige Glendale CA 12/27/2024
654 Kim Szalay Glendale CA 1/23/2025
655 kimu Ulrich Glendale CA 1/20/2025
656 Klara Arakelian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
657 Kristal Ghil Glendale CA 1/28/2025
658 Kristal Newman Glendale CA 12/24/2024
659 kristen hetland Glendale CA 1/20/2025
660 Kristina Kunikova Glendale CA 12/24/2024
661 Kristine Tevosyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
662 Kymberly Oakes Glendale CA 12/28/2024
663 L . C. Turner Glendale CA 1/23/2025
664 Lana Barajas Glendale CA 12/27/2024
665 Laura Crook Glendale CA 1/6/2025
666 Laura Gray Glendale CA 1/4/2025
667 Laura Kirakosian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
668 Laure Daluro Arcenas Glendale CA 12/29/2024
669 Laurel Phelan Glendale CA 1/28/2025
670 Lauren Taylor Glendale CA 1/11/2025
671 Laurie Johnstone Glendale CA 1/22/2025
672 Laurie Wendorf Glendale CA 1/1/2025
673 Leah Cone Glendale CA 12/31/2024
674 Leana Seper Glendale CA 12/25/2024
675 Lee Straus Glendale CA 12/23/2024
676 Lena Markaruan Glendale CA 1/19/2025
677 Lerna Amiryans Glendale CA 1/19/2025
678 Lesley Mesa Glendale CA 12/28/2024
679 Lewis Snow Glendale CA 1/4/2025
680 Lia Caprara Glendale CA 1/20/2025
681 Lia Nalbandian Glendale CA 1/25/2025
682 Liana Sarkisyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
683 Lilia Hernandez Glendale CA 1/29/2025
684 Lilia Parsadanyan Glendale CA 1/23/2025
685 Lilian Petrosian Glendale CA 1/14/2025
686 Lilit Javadian Glendale CA 1/27/2025
687 Lillian Buchhammer Glendale CA 1/7/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 688 Linda Cleverley Glendale CA 12/24/2024
689 Linda Fitzgerald Glendale CA 1/19/2025
690 Linda Foris Glendale CA 1/6/2025
691 Linda Iannucci, M . S. Glendale CA 1/10/2025
692 Linda Sheffield Glendale CA 12/26/2024
693 Lional Messi Glendale CA 1/24/2025
694 Lipo Karapetyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
695 Lisa Allen Glendale CA 12/30/2024
696 Lisa Alvord-Salomon Glendale CA 1/26/2025
697 Lisa C Blondo Glendale CA 1/16/2025
698 Lisa Dols Glendale CA 1/29/2025
699 Lisa Hollis Glendale CA 1/7/2025
700 Lisa Ivvet Glendale CA 1/11/2025
701 lisa Malone Glendale CA 1/10/2025
702 Lisa Morris Glendale CA 1/23/2025
703 Lisa Stevenson Glendale CA 1/25/2025
704 Lisa Thorsen Glendale CA 12/24/2024
705 Lisa Yesko Glendale CA 12/23/2024
706 Liselotte Holzer Glendale CA 12/23/2024
707 Liz Weaver Glendale CA 1/10/2025
708 loree gold Glendale CA 1/4/2025
709 Lorena Hueso Glendale CA 1/19/2025
710 Lorenzo Salguero Glendale CA 1/20/2025
711 Loretta DeLange Glendale CA 1/1/2025
712 Lorna Giles Glendale CA 12/23/2024
713 Louie Jane Lorenzana Glendale CA 1/10/2025
714 Louis Straser Glendale CA 12/27/2024
715 Louise McReynolds Glendale CA 12/29/2024
716 Louise Phelan Glendale CA 1/28/2025
717 Lucia Robinson Glendale CA 1/9/2025
718 Lucine Sohrabian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
719 Lucy Mardonovich Glendale CA 1/11/2025
720 Ludmila Vysotsky Glendale CA 1/11/2025
721 Luis Cuadrado Glendale CA 1/12/2025
722 Lupe Padilla Glendale CA 12/27/2024
723 Lupita Tannatt Glendale CA 12/25/2024
724 Lusik Harutunian Glendale CA 1/14/2025
725 Lydia Alvarado Glendale CA 1/20/2025
726 Lydia Henry Glendale CA 12/29/2024
727 Lydia Kim Glendale CA 1/20/2025
728 Lydia Limon Glendale CA 12/30/2024
729 Lydia Trout Glendale CA 1/19/2025
730 Lynda Beck Glendale CA 12/23/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 731 Lynda Hessick Glendale CA 1/20/2025
732 Lynne Stewart Glendale CA 1/19/2025
733 Lynne Weiske Glendale CA 1/3/2025
734 Lyubov Bila Glendale CA 1/17/2025
735 M A E Eliassian Glendale CA 1/23/2025
736 M Shigoka Glendale CA 1/23/2025
737 Madaleyne Sallakian Glendale CA 1/8/2025
738 Madison Luka Glendale CA 1/14/2025
739 Madlen Gadimyan Glendale CA 1/8/2025
740 Magali Larios Glendale CA 1/20/2025
741 Magdalena Hamalian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
742 Magdalena Moreno Glendale CA 1/19/2025
743 Mahvash Nohroodi Glendale CA 1/10/2025
744 Maikel Rizkalla Glendale CA 1/21/2025
745 Mala Nanda Glendale CA 1/2/2025
746 Malgorzata Grzyb Glendale CA 12/30/2024
747 Manuel Natividad Glendale CA 12/24/2024
748 Marcellina DeSousa Glendale CA 1/7/2025
749 Marcia Hanford Glendale CA 1/6/2025
750 Marcos Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
751 Mardee Ballew Glendale CA 12/30/2024
752 Margaret Gwynne Glendale CA 12/30/2024
753 Margaret Hall Glendale CA 1/28/2025
754 Margaret Terrill Glendale CA 12/31/2024
755 Margaret Trashian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
756 Margarita Tovmasian Glendale CA 1/13/2025
757 Margi Simpkins Glendale CA 12/24/2024
758 Mari Cantos Glendale CA 1/19/2025
759 Mari McCarthy Glendale CA 12/30/2024
760 Maria Klein Glendale CA 12/31/2024
761 Maria Muro Glendale CA 1/24/2025
762 Maria Sahakian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
763 Maria Saroukhanian Glendale CA 1/22/2025
764 Marian Getts Glendale CA 1/26/2025
765 Marian Scully Glendale CA 1/19/2025
766 Mariann Nolan Glendale CA 12/30/2024
767 marianne angeles glendale CA 1/14/2025
768 Maribel Babiera Glendale CA 1/21/2025
769 Marie Baker Glendale CA 12/31/2024
770 Marielle Cedeno Glendale CA 1/22/2025
771 Marilyn Baker Glendale CA 12/24/2024
772 Marilyn De Leon Glendale CA 12/26/2024
773 Marilyn Gonzalez Glendale CA 12/29/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 774 MARILYN GREBORUNIS Glendale CA 1/6/2025
775 marina bertarelli Glendale CA 12/26/2024
776 Marina mazanians Glendale CA 1/22/2025
777 Marine Ginosyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
778 Marine Haleblian Glendale CA 12/28/2024
779 marine petrosyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
780 Marion Savage Glendale CA 1/7/2025
781 mark hasencamp Glendale CA 1/10/2025
782 Mark Kausler Glendale CA 1/20/2025
783 Mark Taraborelli Glendale CA 12/23/2024
784 Marnie Gaede Glendale CA 12/28/2024
785 Marshall Granger Glendale CA 1/23/2025
786 Martha Ramos Glendale CA 1/26/2025
787 Martin Miller Glendale CA 1/3/2025
788 Martin Romero Glendale CA 1/19/2025
789 Mary Ann Novoa Glendale CA 1/24/2025
790 Mary Cota Glendale CA 12/27/2024
791 Mary French Smith Glendale CA 1/29/2025
792 Mary Gharibian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
793 Mary Jabban Glendale CA 1/24/2025
794 Mary LaCroix Glendale CA 1/22/2025
795 Mary Stanford Glendale CA 1/27/2025
796 Mary Trella Glendale CA 12/31/2024
797 MaryAnne Steinberger Glendale CA 1/3/2025
798 Maryem irias Glendale CA 1/25/2025
799 Marz Choi Glendale CA 12/27/2024
800 Matthew Davoudian Glendale CA 1/29/2025
801 Matthew Ghukassian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
802 Matthew Lyneis Glendale CA 1/19/2025
803 Matthew Reilly Glendale CA 1/19/2025
804 Matthew Sultan Glendale CA 12/23/2024
805 Maureen Padilla Glendale CA 1/27/2025
806 Max K Glendale CA 1/6/2025
807 Maydi Hovaguimian Glendale CA 1/29/2025
808 Megan Bryant Glendale CA 1/10/2025
809 Megan Rawa Glendale CA 12/24/2024
810 Megan Sekoian Glendale CA 1/9/2025
811 Mehmet H. ozgur Glendale CA 1/22/2025
812 Mel Gal Glendale CA 1/7/2025
813 Melanie McKinnell Glendale CA 1/7/2025
814 Melanie Zermeno Glendale CA 1/7/2025
815 Melina Baranian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
816 Melina Gonzalez Glendale CA 12/26/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 817 Meline Eng Glendale CA 12/25/2024
818 Melisa L Glendale CA 12/23/2024
819 Melissa Levengood Glendale CA 1/3/2025
820 Melissa Mendoza Rodriguez Glendale CA 1/20/2025
821 Melissa Valle Glendale CA 12/24/2024
822 Melodi Gulsen Glendale CA 1/4/2025
823 Meredith Hicks Glendale CA 1/14/2025
824 Michael Andrews Glendale CA 12/30/2024
825 Michael Bates Glendale CA 1/11/2025
826 Michael Bess Glendale CA 1/9/2025
827 Michael Bloom Glendale CA 1/12/2025
828 Michael Carian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
829 Michael Cooney Glendale CA 1/17/2025
830 Michael Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/20/2025
831 MICHAEL Inn Glendale CA 12/24/2024
832 Michael Lessa Glendale CA 12/24/2024
833 Michael Nguyen Glendale CA 1/6/2025
834 Michael Olivera Glendale CA 1/22/2025
835 Michael Pond Glendale CA 1/26/2025
836 Michael Ramos Glendale CA 1/23/2025
837 Michael Rosenbaum Glendale CA 1/21/2025
838 Michael Rosenfeld Glendale CA 1/19/2025
839 Michael Rossetti Glendale CA 1/29/2025
840 Michael Sanvictores Glendale CA 1/8/2025
841 Michele B Glendale CA 12/24/2024
842 Michele D Glendale CA 12/22/2024
843 Michele Lacher Glendale CA 1/3/2025
844 Michele Overgaard Glendale CA 1/19/2025
845 Michelle Bidstrup Glendale CA 1/21/2025
846 Michelle Lopez Glendale CA 1/10/2025
847 Migdia Chinea Glendale CA 12/24/2024
848 Miguel Rosales Glendale CA 1/22/2025
849 Mike Hakopyan Glendale CA 12/24/2024
850 Mike Simonyam Glendale CA 1/8/2025
851 Mikhail Koyfman Glendale CA 1/20/2025
852 miki zmolek Glendale CA 12/23/2024
853 Mina Khalifa Glendale CA 1/20/2025
854 Mindy Markowitz Glendale CA 1/7/2025
855 Missi Figueroa Glendale CA 12/29/2024
856 Molly Sotak Glendale CA 1/4/2025
857 Mona Apana Glendale CA 1/20/2025
858 Monique Lehmann Glendale PA 1/27/2025
859 Morgan C Glendale CA 12/24/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 860 Myrna Gutierrez Glendale CA 12/29/2024
861 Naira Makaryan Glendale CA 1/6/2025
862 Naira Soghbatyan Glendale CA 12/24/2024
863 Nancy Clay Glendale CA 12/25/2024
864 Nancy Dart Glendale CT 1/22/2025
865 Nancy Durham Glendale CA 1/21/2025
866 Nancy Harasz Glendale CA 12/27/2024
867 Nancy Hilton Glendale CA 1/20/2025
868 Nancy Oshima Glendale CA 12/23/2024
869 Nancy Reynolds Glendale CA 1/20/2025
870 Nancy Saravia Glendale CA 1/11/2025
871 Nancy Shiroyan Glendale CA 12/30/2024
872 Nancy Sumner glendale CA 12/24/2024
873 NANCY TUCKER Glendale CA 1/5/2025
874 Nanoor petrousyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
875 Nansi Ghaenian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
876 Nare Ovasapyan Glendale CA 1/23/2025
877 Narek Avanesyan Glendale CA 1/28/2025
878 Narine Khachikyan Glendale CA 1/22/2025
879 Nas Zarin Glendale CA 1/20/2025
880 Nasrin Toussi Glendale CA 1/11/2025
881 Natalia Borzym Glendale CA 1/8/2025
882 Natalie Bautista Glendale CA 12/30/2024
883 Natalie Drake Glendale CA 1/26/2025
884 Neal Collier Glendale CA 12/24/2024
885 Nelly PRESTAT Glendale CA 12/24/2024
886 Nelson Villanueva Glendale CA 1/10/2025
887 Nicholas Junger Glendale CA 12/27/2024
888 Nick Negoescu Glendale CA 12/25/2024
889 Nicolette Lefebre Surina Glendale CA 12/29/2024
890 Nilesh Desai Glendale CA 12/26/2024
891 Noah Cima Glendale CA 1/28/2025
892 Noemi Arciniega Glendale CA 1/9/2025
893 Nona Baroma Glendale CA 1/21/2025
894 Nooneh Gyurjyan Glendale CA 1/14/2025
895 Nooneh Khachatourian Glendale CA 1/12/2025
896 Norik Babakhanian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
897 nowell teitelbaum Glendale CA 1/2/2025
898 nubar boghossian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
899 Nune Pogosyan Glendale CA 12/30/2024
900 oilda guerra Glendale CA 1/7/2025
901 Olivia Diaz Glendale CA 12/26/2024
902 Ozzie Rangel Glendale CA 1/4/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 903 P C Glendale CA 1/19/2025
904 Palmira Perez Glendale CA 12/29/2024
905 Pam Vasquez Glendale CA 12/28/2024
906 Pamela Elyea Glendale CA 1/1/2025
907 Pamela Gibberman Glendale CA 1/4/2025
908 Pandora Young Glendale CA 1/22/2025
909 Parkouhi Pirijanian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
910 Parviz Ahoubim Glendale CA 1/11/2025
911 Patricia Gamboa Glendale CA 1/22/2025
912 Patricia Hill Glendale CA 12/24/2024
913 Patricia Martinez Glendale CA 12/29/2024
914 Patricia Messina Glendale CA 12/26/2024
915 Patricia Trytten Glendale CA 1/23/2025
916 Patricia Walters Glendale CA 1/22/2025
917 Patrick Mathews Glendale CA 1/20/2025
918 patrick Murphy Glendale CA 1/23/2025
919 patty silversher Glendale CA 12/31/2024
920 Paul Chamberlain Glendale CA 1/7/2025
921 Paul Manchester Glendale CA 12/24/2024
922 Paul Segovia Glendale CA 1/5/2025
923 Paul Zaleski Glendale CA 1/22/2025
924 Paula Ramos Glendale CA 12/29/2024
925 Paulina Morales Glendale CA 1/25/2025
926 Peggy Durham Glendale CA 1/7/2025
927 Penny Laine Herrera Glendale CA 12/23/2024
928 Peter Lanfer Glendale CA 1/8/2025
929 peter m graf Glendale CA 1/4/2025
930 Peter Ruzicka Glendale CA 12/29/2024
931 Peter Weir Glendale CA 1/7/2025
932 Polita Barnes Glendale CA 1/23/2025
933 polland ang Glendale CA 1/20/2025
934 Rachel Estrada Glendale CA 1/7/2025
935 Rachel Keenan Glendale CA 1/9/2025
936 Rachel Rosenman Glendale CA 12/27/2024
937 Rafael Shotland Glendale CA 1/10/2025
938 Raffi Nerkizian Glendale MA 1/11/2025
939 Raffi Tarakjian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
940 Rainbow Fang Glendale CA 1/22/2025
941 Rainy Jacobs Glendale CA 12/29/2024
942 Raj Perry Glendale CA 1/10/2025
943 Ramona Barrio Glendale CA 12/25/2024
944 Rana Sallakian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
945 Randy Kamiya Glendale CA 1/11/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 946 Raquel Morales Glendale CA 1/24/2025
947 Raquel Pieiga Glendale CA 1/26/2025
948 Raylene Filley Glendale CA 1/10/2025
949 Raymond Pourian Glendale CA 1/12/2025
950 RAZMIC GHARAKHANIAN Glendale CA 1/29/2025
951 Rebecca Delgado Glendale CA 1/8/2025
952 Rebecca Sullivan Glendale CA 1/22/2025
953 Renata Cheferrino Glendale CA 12/23/2024
954 Rene Caneva glendale CA 12/24/2024
955 Rene Moreno Glendale CA 12/25/2024
956 Renee Barajas Glendale CA 1/14/2025
957 Renee Dauw Glendale CA 12/28/2024
958 Renee Madison Glendale CA 12/28/2024
959 Renee Powell Glendale CA 1/27/2025
960 Renee Ralls Glendale CA 1/19/2025
961 Rhoda Conde Glendale CA 1/7/2025
962 Ricardo Gonzales Glendale CA 1/2/2025
963 Ricardo Ruiz Glendale CA 12/27/2024
964 Ricardo Yernazian Glendale CA 12/26/2024
965 Rich & Jen Muirhead Glendale CA 1/19/2025
966 Rich Hockens Glendale CA 1/20/2025
967 richard Binder, G Glendale CA 1/10/2025
968 Richard Connolly Glendale CA 1/25/2025
969 Richard Maynes Glendale CA 1/7/2025
970 Richard Seibel Glendale CA 12/29/2024
971 Richard Valencia Glendale CA 1/10/2025
972 Rick Gonzalez Glendale CA 1/17/2025
973 Rick Lanuza Glendale CA 1/3/2025
974 Rick Merante Glendale CA 1/20/2025
975 Rima Eivazian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
976 Risa Dyer Glendale CA 12/31/2024
977 Rita Burns Glendale CA 1/19/2025
978 Rita Josephbek Glendale CA 1/22/2025
979 Rita Koechowski Glendale CA 12/24/2024
980 Rita Thio Glendale CA 1/6/2025
981 Roana Thornock Glendale CA 12/24/2024
982 Robert farewell Glendale CA 1/7/2025
983 Robert Navarro Glendale CA 1/19/2025
984 Robert Ohanian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
985 Robert Peevy Glendale CA 1/4/2025
986 robert snyder Glendale CA 12/23/2024
987 Robert Velis Glendale CA 12/26/2024
988 Robin Bautista Glendale UT 12/25/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 989 Robin Rose Glendale CA 1/8/2025
990 robyn link Glendale CA 1/3/2025
991 Rocio Davila Glendale CA 1/10/2025
992 Ron Christensen Glendale CA 12/27/2024
993 Ron Derhacopian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
994 Ron Koff Glendale CA 1/4/2025
995 Ronald Cronce Glendale CA 12/27/2024
996 Ronald Ramirez Glendale CA 1/3/2025
997 Rondi Werner Glendale CA 12/31/2024
998 Roobina Sarkisian Glendale CA 1/6/2025
999 Rosa Cabrerizo Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1000 rosemary torossian Glendale CA 1/21/2025
1001 Rosiris Paniagua Glendale 12/30/2024
1002 Roubina Mirzakhanian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1003 Roxana Feher Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1004 Roxanne Lopez Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1005 Rubin Pirveysian Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1006 Ruby G Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1007 Ruby Marcos Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1008 Rukmani Ramdharry Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1009 Ruth Eley Glendale CA 12/27/2024
1010 Ruzanna Khachatryan Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1011 Ruzanna Petrossian Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1012 S J Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1013 S Smissen Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1014 Sage Cotugno Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1015 sahak zargarian Glendale CA 12/27/2024
1016 Sam Marcos Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1017 Sam Vali Glendale CA 1/9/2025
1018 Samantha George Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1019 Samantha Jones Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1020 Samya McCoy Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1021 Sandra Burch Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1022 Sandra Del Monte Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1023 Sandra Hinojosa Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1024 Sandy Shilling Glendale 1/24/2025
1025 Sara Britowich Glendale CA 1/27/2025
1026 Sara Hyoun Glendale CA 12/26/2024
1027 Sara Wilhoit Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1028 Sarah Lanfer Glendale CA 1/8/2025
1029 Sarah Marschman Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1030 Sarah Schnitger Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1031 Sarah Tacoma Glendale CA 1/22/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1032 Sarai Borunda Glendale CA 12/31/2024
1033 Sarkis Kardashian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1034 Sarpie Vartanian Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1035 satik Pogosyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1036 Saul Perez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1037 Scott Harris Glendale CA 1/9/2025
1038 Scott Smissen Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1039 Scott warren Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1040 Scout Doyle Glendale CA 12/28/2024
1041 Sebastian Kouladjian Glendale CA 1/2/2025
1042 Sebastian Kouladjian Glendale CA 1/16/2025
1043 Seda Isagulyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1044 Sedrak Agazaryan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1045 Sergey Manucharyan Glendale CA 1/21/2025
1046 Seta Postajian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1047 Shaida Moghaddam Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1048 Shana Redmon Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1049 Shane Wool Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1050 Shani Ben-David Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1051 Shanna Pico Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1052 Shannon Sabelline Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1053 Shant Tokatyan Glendale CA 1/1/2025
1054 Shar Behrman Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1055 Sharlene Lopez Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1056 Sharon Bales Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1057 Sharon McDonald McDonald Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1058 Sharon Nasell Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1059 Sheila Giammarco Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1060 Sheldon Phillips Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1061 Shelly Garcia Glendale CA 1/8/2025
1062 sheree labo Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1063 Sheri Apodaca Glendale CA 1/2/2025
1064 Sherillelynn Lee Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1065 Sherrell Cuneo Glendale CA 12/29/2024
1066 Sherry Kobashigawa Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1067 Sheryl Boykin Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1068 Sheryl Shoemaker Glendale CA 12/27/2024
1069 Shiferaw Awlachew Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1070 Shirley Schauer Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1071 Shushanik Devine Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1072 Shushanik Devine Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1073 Silva Kegulian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1074 SILVIA SUAREZ Glendale CA 1/29/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1075 Simin Pazatgad Glendale CA 12/27/2024
1076 Sindy Lawrence Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1077 Siran Mkhitarian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1078 Sivert Glarum Glendale CA 12/25/2024
1079 Solaleh Shahrokhi Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1080 sona avedian Glendale CA 1/8/2025
1081 Sonia Silva Glendale CA 12/28/2024
1082 Sonik Arutyunyan Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1083 Sophia A Glendale CA 12/26/2024
1084 Sosseh Ohanian Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1085 Souzi Sallakian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1086 Spenser Brooks Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1087 Stacey Boucher Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1088 Stella Sias Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1089 Stephan Monteleone Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1090 Stephanie Colet Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1091 Stephanie Connon Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1092 Stephanie Haibloom Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1093 Stephanie Nunez Glendale CA 12/31/2024
1094 Stephannie Vital Glendale CA 12/26/2024
1095 Stephen Holmoe Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1096 Stephen Parker Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1097 Stephen Svetich Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1098 Steve DeMirjian Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1099 Steve Farris Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1100 Steve Henige Glendale CA 1/2/2025
1101 Steve Monico Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1102 Steven De La Rosa Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1103 Steven Goby Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1104 Sue Mondt Glendale CA 12/27/2024
1105 Susan Collins Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1106 Susan Colosimo Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1107 Susan Cutujian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1108 Susan Dasso Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1109 Susan Deneen Glendale CA 12/26/2024
1110 susan devereaux Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1111 Susan DiCato Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1112 Susan Hunt Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1113 susan janoyan glendale CA 12/29/2024
1114 Susan Johnson Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1115 Susan P. Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1116 Susan Saikami Glendale CA 1/12/2025
1117 Susan Schaffer Glendale CA 1/10/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1118 Susan Siam Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1119 Susan Stahman Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1120 Susanna Manukyan Glendale CA 1/5/2025
1121 Susi Higgins Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1122 Suzanne Mirzoyan Glendale CA 1/17/2025
1123 Suzanne O'Connor Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1124 Suzanne Szalay Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1125 Suzanne Van Kirk Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1126 syuzi sarkisyan glendale CA 1/11/2025
1127 T Ambartsumyan Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1128 T Mo Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1129 Tadeh Bazik Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1130 Talin Kara Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1131 Talin Tchakmakjian Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1132 Taline Soualian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1133 Tam Breckenridge Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1134 Tamar jarchafjian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1135 Tamara Matz Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1136 Tamara Psaltis Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1137 Tanya Wilson Glendale CA 12/26/2024
1138 Tapafua Vaoga Glendale CA 1/27/2025
1139 Tara Martinez Fernandez Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1140 Tatev Aghajanian Glendale CA 1/9/2025
1141 Tatevik Hunanyan Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1142 Tatool Hartoonian Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1143 Teni Panosian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1144 Teny Chaharbakhsh Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1145 Teresa Cusumano Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1146 Teresa Sullivan Glendale CA 12/29/2024
1147 Terra Anadren Glendale CA 1/29/2025
1148 Terry Jahraus Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1149 teryl willette Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1150 Tevan Khudanyan Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1151 Thad Zajdowicz Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1152 Thalia Del Razo Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1153 Theodore Bodwell Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1154 Theodore Polychronis Glendale CA 12/29/2024
1155 Theresa corrales Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1156 Thomas Hendricks Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1157 Thomas Vandermillen Glendale CA 12/26/2024
1158 Tim Maurer Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1159 Timothy Hankish Glendale CA 1/5/2025
1160 tin hovasapian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1161 Tina Clark Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1162 Tina Wilson Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1163 Tinna Lee Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1164 Tiziana Ventura Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1165 Toby Session Glendale CA 12/31/2024
1166 Todd Friedline Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1167 Tom Atha Glendale CA 12/29/2024
1168 Tom Gatsoulis Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1169 TONI STAMM Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1170 Tony Kaloghlian Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1171 Toross Chaparian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1172 Traci Lashbrook Glendale CA 1/29/2025
1173 Traci Yee Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1174 Tracy Acklin Glendale CA 1/12/2025
1175 Tracy Wallace Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1176 Udaya Manchikatla Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1177 Vahan Adamov Glendale CA 1/21/2025
1178 Vahik Shafrazian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1179 van shirvanian Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1180 Vanessa Lim Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1181 Vanessa Watts Glendale CA 1/12/2025
1182 Varouj Keledjian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1183 Verna Stalmac Glendale CA 1/29/2025
1184 Vic Bedrossian Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1185 Vic Kurdian Glendale CA 1/16/2025
1186 Vic Pallos Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1187 Vicki Lott Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1188 Vicki Rank Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1189 Vicky Schleifstein Glendale CA 12/23/2024
1190 Victor Rodriguez Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1191 Victor Sallas Glendale 1/25/2025
1192 Victor Siam Glendale CA 1/6/2025
1193 Victoria Shepherd Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1194 Victoria Valle Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1195 Vigen Ghazarian Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1196 Viggen Garibian Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1197 Vincent Mills Glendale CA 12/28/2024
1198 Virginia Noyes Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1199 Virginia Pardo Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1200 Vivian Kanchian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1201 Vivian Spuehler Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1202 Vrezh Khalatyan Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1203 Wasim Shaikh Glendale 1/26/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1204 Wayne Gauthier Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1205 Wendy Frado Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1206 Wilbert Plijnaar Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1207 Will Allen Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1208 William H Nation Glendale CA 12/28/2024
1209 William Menjivar Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1210 William Vasquez Glendale CA 12/28/2024
1211 William Weisman Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1212 Winston Elizalde Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1213 Xiaoyu Cheng Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1214 Yepraksi Amran Glendale CA 1/2/2025
1215 Yesenia Vasquez Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1216 Yohannes Goitom Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1217 Yoon Chung Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1218 Yung Eazy Glendale 1/20/2025
1219 Yvette Shearer Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1220 Yvonne Simon Glendale CA 12/30/2024
1221 Zack Hall Glendale CA 1/4/2025
1222 Zara Grigorian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1223 Zarui Voskanyan Glendale CA 12/29/2024
1224 Zohair Shamma Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1225 Zuzka Eggena Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1226 Christian Bier Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1227 Tina Conway Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1228 Roxana Moya Glendale CA 12/24/2024
1229 Arturo Garcia Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1230 Cherry Lau Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1231 Chivas Mays Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1232 Emily Sanchez Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1233 A Zaraian Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1234 Irene Stayersullivan Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1235 Julian C Glendale CA 1/9/2025
1236 Kora Smith Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1237 Krystal Winters Glendale CA 1/3/2025
1238 Lala K Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1239 LaTasha A. Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1240 Lylah Sardinas Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1241 Mary Ann Luce Glendale CA 1/29/2025
1242 micheal vanderlen Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1243 Michele Herasuta Glendale CA 1/27/2025
1244 Mr. Vinderbot Glendale CA 1/9/2025
1245 Natasha P Glendale CA 1/21/2025
1246 Nora Montoya Glendale CA 1/23/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1247 Nune Galstyan Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1248 Óðinn Nightraven Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1249 Phuong Le Glendale CA 1/27/2025
1250 Thomas Gudiel Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1251 Angela Kodzhanyan Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1252 Paul Johnson Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1253 Travis Ward Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1254 Audrey Khatchikian Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1255 Frank DeLuca Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1256 Irma Silva Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1257 Jocelyn Maldonado Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1258 MARTHA SANDOVAL Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1259 Pamela Vrlenich Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1260 Rachel Hernandez Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1261 Sara Loughlin Craver Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1262 traci bailey Glendale CA 1/21/2025
1263 Yohannes foron Glendale AZ 1/25/2025
1264 Alex Guerrero Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1265 Debbie Castaneda Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1266 Bryan Wei Glendale CA 1/11/2025
1267 Jason Park Glendale CA 1/4/2025
1268 Mo Thout Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1269 EDWARD GAONA Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1270 Rosa Martinez Glendale CA 1/29/2025
1271 Stephanie javier Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1272 Artin Rostami Glendale CA 1/2/2025
1273 Barbara CURREN Glendale CA 1/1/2025
1274 Caroline Foley Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1275 Craig Cliver Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1276 Cristina CASTRO TORRES Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1277 Dalita Zadoorian Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1278 David Wolf Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1279 Elin Tarvirdi Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1280 Emily Zung Manninger Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1281 Erick Turcios Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1282 Ferguson Winston Glendale CA 1/4/2025
1283 Jackie Kubel Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1284 Jessica Present Glendale CA 1/7/2025
1285 John Sullivan Glendale CA 1/26/2025
1286 Joyce Chin Glendale CA 1/17/2025
1287 Kristin Schneider Glendale CA 1/23/2025
1288 Lorie Thomson Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1289 Mary Baldwin Glendale CA 12/31/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1290 Rebecca DePalma Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1291 Teresa Porras Glendale CA 1/25/2025
1292 Vanessa McGrady Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1293 Fernando Vazquez Glendale CA 1/20/2025
1294 Monica Barcenas Glendale CA 1/10/2025
1295 Andrea Zito Glendale CA 1/24/2025
1296 Robert Spitz Glendale CA 1/28/2025
1297 Jacob Alexander Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1298 Alexandra Marino Glendale CA 1/8/2025
1299 AMY Hunter Glendale CA 1/22/2025
1300 L Robinson glendale CA 1/22/2025
1301 Ute Baum Glendale CA 12/31/2024
1302 sara pimenta Glendale CA 1/19/2025
1303 Erika Perez Glendale CA 1/4/2025
1304 david bogosian glendale CA 1/29/2025
1305 Darren Stroughter II Glendale CA 1/29/2025
1306 Howard Berger Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1307 Melissa Lovoy Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1308 Marisa Futernick Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1309 Sharon Pack Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1310 alexis fleisig Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1311 Zaven Demirjian Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1312 Andrew Rios Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1313 Jeffrey Maxcy Glendale AZ 1/30/2025
1314 Tamorah Cancilla Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1315 Geraldine Soriano Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1316 Krystina Castella Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1317 Hermineh Babaian Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1318 Lisa Farber Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1319 David Ibrahim Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1320 Leanna Ayrapetyan Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1321 Amanda Sandberg Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1322 Sophie Clemente Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1323 Anoosh Zakarian Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1324 Britta Foshee Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1325 Robert Velis Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1326 Yvonne Smith Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1327 Arielle Barba Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1328 RuthAnn Berg Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1329 Zaquesh DaCampos Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1330 B Davis Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1331 Alina Moradyan Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1332 Jeri Anderson Glendale CA 1/30/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1333 Perry Nazari Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1334 Kim Raisani Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1335 Kristine Andreasyan Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1336 C Rand Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1337 Katrin Ebrahamian Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1338 Bonnie Strand Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1339 Joanne Hedge Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1340 Steven Fox Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1341 Nina Clark Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1342 Shelly Benedict Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1343 Terri Murray Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1344 Christine Schoenwald Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1345 anjik vartanian Glendale 1/30/2025
1346 Suzanne Whitman Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1347 Yana Gasparyan Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1348 andrew hall Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1349 Sib M Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1350 Robert King Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1351 Mary Follett Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1352 KAMERON LENNOX Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1353 Maria De Los Santos Kaye Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1354 Stéphane Elfassi Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1355 Victor Harris Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1356 Sam Demonteverde Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1357 Lyn Ribisi Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1358 GARY BLACKWOOD Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1359 Bette Cotter Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1360 RAYLENE CHIARIZZIO Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1361 Susan Griffith Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1362 Roshanak Eftekhari Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1363 Sarah Scott Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1364 Suzanne Bangert Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1365 Valerie Henley Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1366 Suzanne Whifler Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1367 Lorraine Buntain Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1368 Eric LaCom Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1369 Greg Shields Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1370 Robert Atkinson Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1371 Pamela Amato Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1372 David Klein Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1373 Patricia Morton Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1374 VERGINEH BABAJANYAN Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1375 Melineh Hatamian Glendale CA 1/30/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1376 Nicole Petrousian glendale CA 1/30/2025
1377 Lilit Petrousian Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1378 Carl Fieler Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1379 Nathaniel Bevins Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1380 Laurel Whitcomb Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1381 THOMAS ALEXANIAN Glendale CA 1/30/2025
1382 Anthony Kwon Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1383 Dragutin Ilich Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1384 Karineh Berge Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1385 gayle fitch Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1386 Paula Sigman-Lowery Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1387 Renee Sallakian Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1388 Lily Rodriguez Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1389 ROSEANNE AIELLO Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1390 Annie Lunsford Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1391 Gia Firestone Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1392 Deanna Stadler Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1393 Susan Silva Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1394 Ken Ng Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1395 Jeannette Mueller Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1396 Holden Shannon Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1397 Amy Sarkissian Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1398 Marianne Berger Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1399 Sang Chang Glendale 1/31/2025
1400 Donna Kim Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1401 Jennifer Daniels Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1402 serineh yeghikian Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1403 W. G. Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1404 Adelina Antonyan Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1405 john ter-zakarian Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1406 Silva Barghi Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1407 T Bedford Glendale CA 1/31/2025
1408 Nisan Kazman Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1409 kylie ice glendale CA 2/1/2025
1410 Ani Bedzhanyan Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1411 Auden Botel Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1412 Rhett Mueller Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1413 Deborah Brown Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1414 Geena Mueller Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1415 INA DAN Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1416 Elizabeth Teemley Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1417 Simon Wright Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1418 Karen Saunders Glendale CA 2/1/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1419 Mineli Gagliano Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1420 Zareh Ambarsoom Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1421 Deborah Edwards Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1422 Leslie Gordon Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1423 Lori Sacks Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1424 Zohrab Tomboulian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1425 Patil Karadolian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1426 Varduhi Hakobyan Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1427 Armen Ter-Tatevosian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1428 Julie Garcia Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1429 Benjamin Hirschhorn Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1430 Rubina Hartunian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1431 Ara Corbett Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1432 Harut Hajibekyan Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1433 Hitoko Tashi Ohnsman Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1434 Hripsime Hazrian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1435 Charles Bistagne Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1436 Nick Minassian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1437 Melineh Hacopian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1438 Evan Arevelian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1439 Rouben Khachatourian Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1440 Ani Saryan Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1441 Jonathann Hughes Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1442 Liana Saryan Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1443 Lucas Western Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1444 Jessica Hylek Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1445 Carolyn Cook Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1446 Daniel Macgregor Glendale CA 2/1/2025
1447 Karen Swett Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1448 Avik Saryan Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1449 Mercedes Ontanon Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1450 Melineh Martin Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1451 Randy Wong-Westbrooke Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1452 Erika Garcia Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1453 Rick Phelan Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1454 Edwin R. Clubb Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1455 Caroline Killu Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1456 Jeannine B Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1457 Laura Smith Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1458 Judith Wilson Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1459 Razmik Perian Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1460 Alana Waksman Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1461 Adilene Paque Glendale CA 2/2/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1462 Hany Michael Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1463 Kate Spear Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1464 Ann Segal Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1465 Vitaliy Uvakin Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1466 Marianna Clarizio Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1467 Aris Bedrosian Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1468 Malik Ever Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1469 Dean Stahl Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1470 Sydney Tannenbaum Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1471 Keath Silva Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1472 James Kussman Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1473 Gilbert Keshish Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1474 Asher Glaser Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1475 Mario Bahramjian Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1476 Mason Funk Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1477 John Zuker Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1478 Randy Carter glendale CA 2/2/2025
1479 Rooh Steif Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1480 Anait Oganesyan Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1481 Andrea CRISSMAN Glendale CA 2/2/2025
1482 Harry Jierjian Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1483 Kate Sev Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1484 Patricia Turner Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1485 Theresa Zapata Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1486 Bethany Boles Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1487 Shauna McDaniel Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1488 Tina Grigorian Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1489 Antonieta Miranda Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1490 Anna Tirayan Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1491 Mena P Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1492 Vicky Trdatyan Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1493 Maisha Odimo Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1494 Vazgen Stepanosyan Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1495 Filippo Marchino Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1496 Teresa Valencia Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1497 Faith Ivory Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1498 Narbeh Norouzi Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1499 Sam Block Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1500 Ryan Morales Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1501 Milda Bublys Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1502 Mike Mahan-Soto Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1503 Claire Schwartz Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1504 Emma Kadoyan Glendale CA 2/3/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1505 Allen Sarkissian Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1506 Dorothy Cullen Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1507 Joyce Hindson Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1508 Emily Shephard Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1509 Anahid Keshishian Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1510 Vartan Tavidian Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1511 Kenneth Acosta Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1512 Michelle Roy Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1513 Olga Firsova Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1514 Juanisha Anderson Glendale AZ 2/3/2025
1515 Joyce Dean Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1516 Wendy Garen Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1517 Nat Yonce Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1518 Audrey Josephbeg Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1519 Anastasia Kalivas Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1520 Valentina Gharemanian Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1521 Sam Fard Glendale CA 2/3/2025
1522 HOURIK AKAR GLENDALE,CA 2/2/2025
1523 Jennifer Dallas Glendora CA 1/29/2025
1524 Maria Elena Zapata Glendora CA 1/25/2025
1525 Paul Moreno Glendora CA 1/11/2025
1526 Robert Echeverria Glendora CA 1/28/2025
1527 Julia Mendez Glendora 2/2/2025
1528 Demi Sedrakyan Granada HillsCA 1/14/2025
1529 Shatha Matni Granada HillsCA 1/10/2025
1530 Sonia Hernandez Granada HillsCA 1/26/2025
1531 Tamar Grigoryan Granada HillsCA 1/9/2025
1532 Lyda Caceres Granada HillsCA 1/31/2025
1533 Zelene Hesse Grand BlancMI 1/29/2025
1534 teresa coffey Granite FallsNC 1/11/2025
1535 luis lopez Green Bay WI 1/22/2025
1536 Jonathan Blackstock Greenville SC 1/22/2025
1537 MICHELLE KELLY Hacienda HeightsCA 1/8/2025
1538 Villalobos Body HawthorneCA 1/11/2025
1539 Miranda Mallard Hayward CA 2/3/2025
1540 Kathleen McKinney Hemet CA 1/23/2025
1541 Nancy Winters Hermosa BeachCA 1/31/2025
1542 Coreen jenyo Hesperia CA 1/28/2025
1543 T M Hesperia CA 1/26/2025
1544 Joseph Garcia Highland CA 2/2/2025
1545 sandee curry Hixson TN 1/30/2025
1546 Brad Middleton HogansvilleGA 1/11/2025
1547 Shannon Ingraham Hollister CA 1/10/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1548 Jim Newman HollywoodCA 1/8/2025
1549 A . J. Moorehead HollywoodCA 1/30/2025
1550 Elizabeth Cronin Hollywood HillsCA 1/25/2025
1551 Greg Geltner Homeland 1/30/2025
1552 Celeste Wentworth Huntington BeachCA 1/23/2025
1553 Glenn Raymond Huntington BeachCA 1/25/2025
1554 Mary Anne Clement Huntington BeachCA 1/24/2025
1555 Michael Tedesco Huntington BeachCA 1/17/2025
1556 May Michaud Huntington BeachCA 2/2/2025
1557 Bessie Bicos Irvine CA 1/6/2025
1558 Kathleen Risser Irvine CA 1/27/2025
1559 Koroush Kiumarsi Irvine CA 1/28/2025
1560 Laurie Marshall Irvine CA 1/24/2025
1561 Nicholas Ramirez Irvine CA 1/29/2025
1562 Lisa Kogawa Irvine CA 1/30/2025
1563 Jay Morales Irvine CA 2/2/2025
1564 dena zepeda irwindale CA 1/29/2025
1565 Natalie Baack Kanata CA 1/30/2025
1566 Sharon McIntosh KelseyvilleCA 1/22/2025
1567 John Carter Kemp TX 1/31/2025
1568 Jamie Lara Kingsburg CA 1/21/2025
1569 mynka draper l.a. CA 2/2/2025
1570 jason hamilton la CA 1/15/2025
1571 Katie White La CA 1/24/2025
1572 Kiki Lantry LA CA 1/9/2025
1573 Martha Burr LA CA 1/3/2025
1574 Phyllis Joy Manfra La Cañada FlintridgeCA 1/31/2025 1575 Mariyetta Madatyan La CrescentaCA 1/31/2025
1576 Melina Aloian La CrescentaCA 1/31/2025
1577 Keely McKelvey La CrescentaCA 1/31/2025
1578 Gina Plescia La CrescentaCA 1/31/2025
1579 Evangeline Dupas La CrescentaCA 1/31/2025
1580 Stormy Petty La CrescentaCA 2/1/2025
1581 Garen Mangassarian La CrescentaCA 2/1/2025
1582 Ronnie Reynolds La CrescentaCA 2/2/2025
1583 Dean Baker La CrescentaCA 2/3/2025
1584 Laura Nixon La Crescenta-MontroseCA 2/2/2025
1585 Jose Chavez La Jolla CA 2/3/2025
1586 Lisa Lopes La Palma CA 2/3/2025
1587 Ruby Vargas La Puente CA 2/1/2025
1588 Cathy Jurca Laguna BeachCA 1/30/2025
1589 nathan blunt Lake ElsinoreCA 2/3/2025
1590 Diane Calderon Lake ForestCA 1/20/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1591 Angela Laskodi Lakewood CA 2/1/2025
1592 Jose Hernandez Lamont CA 1/31/2025
1593 ellen moreno Lancaster CA 1/8/2025
1594 Janet Ardon Lancaster CA 1/21/2025
1595 John Salcido Lancaster CA 1/11/2025
1596 Leticia Johnson Lancaster CA 1/27/2025
1597 Ragen Rogers Lancaster CA 1/26/2025
1598 Degma Guzman Las Vegas NV 1/30/2025
1599 Alma Santiago-Santos Las Vegas CA 2/1/2025
1600 Anton Farid Lawndale CA 1/20/2025
1601 DENISE SMITH Lawndale CA 1/30/2025
1602 Mariana Gomez Leona ValleyCA 1/10/2025
1603 Jensen Huff Liberty TN 2/3/2025
1604 Netra Dhakal Loma LindaCA 1/26/2025
1605 Teresa Thorson Lompoc CA 1/29/2025
1606 HELEN LAI Long BeachCA 1/27/2025
1607 Janice Haley Long BeachCA 1/11/2025
1608 John Moses Long BeachCA 1/27/2025
1609 Jose Franco Long BeachCA 1/21/2025
1610 Jose Galindo Long BeachCA 1/3/2025
1611 Mia Cupid Long BeachCA 1/10/2025
1612 Michael Monroe Long BeachCA 1/26/2025
1613 Miller Millen Long BeachCA 1/10/2025
1614 Nere Villa Long BeachCA 1/11/2025
1615 Nicole Perez Long BeachCA 1/10/2025
1616 Pat Thompson Long BeachCA 1/10/2025
1617 Vanessa Chavez Long BeachCA 1/10/2025
1618 Roman Amezcua Long BeachCA 1/29/2025
1619 Ruby Tlacatelpa Long BeachCA 1/29/2025
1620 Cindy Koch Long BeachCA 1/30/2025
1621 Susan Garcia Long BeachCA 1/30/2025
1622 Denise Sepulveda-Ritchie Long BeachCA 1/31/2025
1623 amber dominguez Long BeachCA 1/31/2025
1624 Laura Coronado Long BeachCA 2/2/2025
1625 Jade Mothe Long BeachCA 2/2/2025
1626 Dawn Clayman Los AlamitosCA 2/1/2025
1627 Adam Delmonte Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1628 Allison Escobedo Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1629 Allison Hopper Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1630 Amy wu Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1631 Angelina Montrond Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1632 Ann Cordova Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1633 anne Alvara Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1634 Anthony Duenas Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1635 Anthony Salcedo, Esquire Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1636 Antionette Fleming Los AngelesCA 1/13/2025
1637 Ariana Flores Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1638 Ariana Flores Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1639 Ashley Duque Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1640 Ashley King Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1641 Ashley Nunez Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1642 barbara diaz los angelesCA 1/23/2025
1643 Barbara Nestrowitz Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1644 Belen Taylor-Newsom Los AngelesCA 1/19/2025
1645 benny maldonado los angelesCA 1/11/2025
1646 Beth Legaspi Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1647 Beverly Rowe Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1648 Brian Rodda Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1649 Bridget Burns Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1650 Bryan Argueta Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1651 Bryan Zuriff Los AngelesCA 1/19/2025
1652 Carlos Acuna Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1653 Carlos Campos Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1654 Carolina Loz Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1655 Catherine Harder Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1656 CHARLTON BRIONES Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1657 Cheryl Holstrom Los AngelesCA 1/14/2025
1658 chip Phillips Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1659 Chris Cristobal Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1660 Christina Romero Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1661 Christopher Swainston Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1662 Chuck nollitna Los AngelesCA 1/18/2025
1663 Cindy velez Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1664 Cornel Dascalu Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1665 Cynthia Hadden Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1666 Dana Ferguson Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1667 DANA NEWTON Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1668 Daniel Ditzhazy Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1669 david graham Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1670 Demetria Ladalski Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1671 Denyza Alfaro Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1672 Derrick Leung Los AngelesCA 1/13/2025
1673 Douglas Rogers Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1674 Dwayne Wright Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1675 eduardo duarte Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1676 Edwin Cohan Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1677 Elie Assi Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1678 Elizabeth Norkus Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1679 Elizabeth Wood Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1680 Eric Woods Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1681 Eyorusalem Asbu Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1682 Frank Mancilla Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1683 Galen Gering Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1684 Genie Frankel Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1685 Geraldine Aicher Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1686 Gerard Armstrong Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1687 Giovanna Delaval Los Angeles 1/11/2025
1688 Glendi Aleman Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1689 Hafeezah Shakir Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1690 Haley Johnson Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1691 Hasmik Ayvazian Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1692 Haven Holcomb Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1693 Holly Zentz Los AngelesCA 1/17/2025
1694 Hope Leflore Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1695 Hugo S Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1696 Iman Harounian Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1697 Ivan Chinchilla Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1698 Jacqui Buck Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1699 JAMES P. WOHL Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1700 Jasmine Au Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1701 Jean Wertz Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1702 Jeanine Virgin Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1703 jeanne lee Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1704 Jeannette Long Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1705 Jennifer Tucker Los AngelesCA 1/21/2025
1706 Jesse Orozco Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1707 Jilbert Daniel Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1708 Jimmie Steele Los AngelesCA 1/17/2025
1709 jingwen Sun Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1710 Joanne Romo Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1711 John Vincenti Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1712 Jonathan Shander Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1713 Joylene Wagner Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1714 Juan Gonzalez Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1715 Juanita Garcia Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1716 Karen vasquez Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1717 Kate Wolf Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1718 Kevin Trujillo Miller Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1719 L Putnam Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1720 L. Lanning Los AngelesCA 1/13/2025
1721 La Patrick Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1722 Laura Crayton Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1723 Leoni Figueredo Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1724 Leticia Gonzalez Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1725 Lillian Chen Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1726 Linda Bachelier Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1727 Linda West Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1728 Lindsay Woodcox Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1729 lj collins Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1730 Lucia Gonzalez Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1731 Luyun Hou Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1732 Lydia Butler Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1733 Madelin Quijano Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1734 madison and Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1735 Madlen Monet Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1736 Mandy Negrete Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1737 Maneli Abedi Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1738 Manijeh Carmichael Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1739 Marcelle Angelo Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1740 Margaret Mora Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1741 Maria Angelikis Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1742 Maria Rondón Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1743 Maria Temmel Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1744 Marie Santiago Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1745 Marina Sardo Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1746 Mark Cappelletty Los AngelesOH 1/22/2025
1747 Mary Ann Garcia Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1748 Melanie Jaijairam Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1749 melanie quiroz Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1750 Melissa Lopez Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1751 Melody Love Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1752 Michael Garcia Mucino Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1753 Michael Martin Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1754 Michael Serrano Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1755 Michelle Cullen Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1756 Monica Salinas Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1757 Nancy Steiner Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1758 Nayiri Hovsepian Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1759 Nelida Gawlick Los AngelesCA 1/19/2025
1760 Nicholas Rulli Los AngelesCA 1/28/2025
1761 Nicky Cabral Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1762 Patrick Ryan Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1763 Paul Eggler Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1764 Paula Vila Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1765 Poppy Thornton Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1766 Pricilla Caballero Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1767 Rafa Magana Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1768 Rebecca Dines Los AngelesCA 1/17/2025
1769 Reseda Mickey Los AngelesCA 1/21/2025
1770 Risa Sun Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1771 Robert Clark Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1772 robin piccone Los AngelesCA 1/16/2025
1773 Rose Bravo Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1774 Rudy Sanchez Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1775 Ryan Trowbridge Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1776 S Mor Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1777 Samaneh Fanaee Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1778 Samantha Mahony Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1779 Sassan Amini Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1780 Scott Oliver Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1781 Sean Miyamoto Los AngelesCA 1/17/2025
1782 Selena Cevallos Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1783 Seth Pierson Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1784 Shadya Diaz Los AngelesCA 1/12/2025
1785 Shahram Naseri Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1786 Shiva Samani Los AngelesCA 1/29/2025
1787 Sigrid Spazuk Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1788 Sil Vy Los AngelesCA 1/19/2025
1789 Silva Seradarian Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1790 Silvia Moore Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1791 Skippy Green Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1792 Sophia Kyama Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1793 Stephanie Bartron Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1794 stephanie ziemer Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1795 Suki Ewers Los AngelesCA 1/21/2025
1796 Susan Hollander Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1797 Susi Dovlatian Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
1798 T. A Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1799 Teresa Summerville Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1800 Thomas White Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1801 Timothy Ryan Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1802 Tina Yang Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1803 Tony Monico Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1804 Tony Spencer Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1805 Treniece Smith Los AngelesCA 1/26/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1806 Trevino Aaron Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1807 Tyler Lee Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1808 Vahe Sargsyan Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1809 Valerie Hernandez Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1810 Venise Johnson Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1811 Victoria Leytman Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1812 Vyacheslav Siretskiy Los AngelesCA 1/17/2025
1813 Wendy Legacki Los AngelesCA 1/23/2025
1814 Xuyi Siu Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1815 Yolanda Pisnavetzky Los AngelesCA 1/16/2025
1816 Yuridia Contreras Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
1817 Yvonne Aguirre Los AngelesCA 1/22/2025
1818 Zahira Yacoub Los AngelesCA 1/25/2025
1819 Zealand Robles Los AngelesCA 1/24/2025
1820 Елена Гостеева Los AngelesCA 1/27/2025
1821 Ashley Nunez Los Angeles 1/29/2025
1822 Robert Meier Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1823 Guillermo J Farias Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1824 Karen Kasaba Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1825 Annette Wiley Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1826 Mark Howell Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1827 Melody Ruiz Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1828 Taj Musco Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1829 Lanore Larson Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1830 Monica Haynes Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1831 Eileen Ehmann Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1832 Carol Ng Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1833 Rebecca Stillman Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1834 Heather Sabin Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1835 Boris Hamilton Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1836 Rosanne Basu Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1837 Margo Hinshaw Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1838 Torsten Reckert Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1839 Eleanor Whitledge Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1840 Lisa Bustamante Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1841 Linda Brettler Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1842 Nathalie Saphier Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1843 Andrea Mena Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1844 velvet dallesandro Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1845 Gerald Pass Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1846 Megan Tindle Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1847 Richard Sinclair Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1848 Emma Hughes Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1849 Brittany Fyvolent Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1850 Chelsea Price Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1851 Ellen Turner Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1852 Anna Sigal Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1853 Susan Garrett Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1854 Pearl Karon Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1855 Cynthia Hernandez's Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1856 Kenia Martinez Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1857 Kristin Levy Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1858 Celeste Hong Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1859 Ross Flagg Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1860 John Bigham Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1861 Elliott Serjeant Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1862 Veronica Banuelos Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1863 Fritz Herzog Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1864 Aimee Gilchrist Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1865 Faye Dvorchak Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1866 Camilla Cracchiolo Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1867 Chandler McCoy Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1868 Natalie Boyadjian Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1869 Hayley Flores Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1870 Rebecca Koppenhaver Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1871 Nicholas Rojas Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1872 Nelly Martir Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1873 Sara Michon Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1874 Morgan Richmeier Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1875 Kelle Leonard Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1876 Mina Fierra Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1877 Randy Munoz Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1878 Amgad Hanna Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1879 Jennifer Walls Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1880 Ann Bein Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1881 Ron Fleury Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1882 Jody Onorato Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1883 C Thorp Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1884 Kelsey Ledford Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1885 Vee Serna Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1886 Notman Prtrousian Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1887 Hasmik Petrousian Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1888 Liberty McCoy Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1889 Mary Andrews Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1890 Chudney Thompson Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1891 Dalia Salgado Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1892 Elijah Chandler Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1893 Sally Juarez Los AngelesCA 1/30/2025
1894 Darlene Ghoreyshi Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1895 Kristine Madatyan Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1896 Dr. A. Grant Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1897 paige wishart Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1898 Kim Fay Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1899 Pamela Bea Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1900 Laura Caceres Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1901 Don Pestana Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1902 Grazyna Borucki Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1903 Kathy Orozco Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1904 AC Marie Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1905 Mayra Molina Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1906 Houri Mirhosaini Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1907 Carol Paris Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1908 Bonnie Karrin Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1909 Vahram Antonyan Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1910 Laura Acosta Los angelesCA 1/31/2025
1911 Oksana Melikyan Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1912 Murray Aronson Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1913 Edward Alva Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1914 Isabella Hernandez Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1915 Edward Kyle Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1916 Lisa Castelo Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1917 Kelley Derr Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1918 Jacob Martinez Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1919 david barreto Los AngelesCA 1/31/2025
1920 Dominic Tsarofski Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1921 Marine Ishtoyan Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1922 Marissa de Leon Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1923 Suzanne van de Velde Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1924 Anayah Whisenant Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1925 Alaska Lynch Los angelesCA 2/1/2025
1926 mariana m Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1927 Nona Hermandes Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1928 Layla Dimas Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1929 Blessing Alaje Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1930 Kristin Newton Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1931 Dani Otter Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1932 Heather Ruffin Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1933 Vladimir Valsky Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1934 Shawn Mangoli Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1935 Negar Pashmforoush Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1936 William Beasley Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1937 Rosana chavez Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1938 Stewart Rendon Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1939 Mozac Daniels Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1940 david stein Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1941 Jeffrey Yuguchi Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1942 myriam christensen Los Angeles 2/1/2025
1943 Andrea Welker Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1944 Nicole Kronberg Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1945 Ami Ben Shmuel Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1946 Alison Joseph Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1947 Emily Parker Los AngelesCA 2/1/2025
1948 Emmanuelle Carel Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1949 Luis Reyes Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1950 Vanessa Zarba Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1951 Chad Stanley Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1952 David Imani Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1953 Juliette Alvarado Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1954 Haley Kopcho Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1955 Jason Gonzalez Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1956 Drew Thomas Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1957 JACKIE Roane Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1958 Itzel Barbosa Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1959 Tremaine Ellis Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1960 Arlene Kedikian Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1961 Veronica Amaya Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1962 Hetty Lee Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1963 Russel Ingersoll Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1964 Meline Abelian Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1965 Eden Mengesha Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1966 Leslie Valenciano-Lopez Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1967 Nancy Gneier Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1968 monica lozoya Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1969 Greg Gneier Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1970 Yuiko Kobayashi Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1971 Zach Thorpe Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1972 Amanda Russo Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1973 Jack MacCarthy Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1974 Sara Lyons Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1975 Orion Queer Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1976 Chelsea Moore Los AngelesCA 2/2/2025
1977 Shelagh McFadden Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 1978 Cathy Hanna Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1979 Quinn Madden Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1980 Marina Abramian Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1981 Hope Hood Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1982 Ray S Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1983 Johanna Cypis Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1984 Henry Marting Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1985 Laura Conley Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1986 Louiso Oberlander Los angelesCA 2/3/2025
1987 Sierra Williams Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1988 Jazzy Ehrlich-Simm Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1989 Laura Fonseca Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1990 stacey yi Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1991 Tani dabirian Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1992 Gus Reed Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1993 Mike Laude Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1994 Daniel Cardone Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1995 Artin Nazarian Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1996 Hiroshi Konishi Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1997 Bailey Salwey Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1998 Emily Dashiell Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
1999 June Carr Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2000 Laffrey Witbrod Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2001 Daniel Garcia Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2002 Mallory Grossman Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2003 mark torres Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2004 Shea Larson Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2005 Varand Balasanian Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2006 Liza Mann Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2007 Romina Sanchez Los AngelesCA 2/3/2025
2008 Yolanda Acevedo Los ÁngelesCA 12/31/2024
2009 marisa tomei los ángelesCA 1/30/2025
2010 Sanna Kamarainen Los Feliz CA 1/31/2025
2011 Vanessa Ortega Lynwood CA 1/11/2025
2012 Teresa Ceja Madera CA 1/11/2025
2013 Leticia Aguero Madera CA 2/2/2025
2014 katharine marinaro Malibu CA 1/11/2025
2015 Rosalie Rains Malibu CA 1/12/2025
2016 Sarah Hippe Malibu CA 1/20/2025
2017 Amy Chang Manhattan BeachCA 1/11/2025
2018 julie c Manhattan BeachCA 1/23/2025
2019 mark willis Martinez CA 1/26/2025
2020 Melineh Khanbabian Melineh CA 2/1/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2021 Christi-Anne Deschene Menifee CA 1/23/2025
2022 Jake Uny Menifee CA 1/28/2025
2023 Jose silva Merced CA 1/31/2025
2024 Deborah Fox Mira LomaCA 1/20/2025
2025 Jennifer Bahu Mira LomaCA 1/24/2025
2026 Moneeza Malek Mission ViejoCA 1/10/2025
2027 Olivia Murashko Mission ViejoCA 1/28/2025
2028 Suresh Jhawar Mission ViejoCA 1/25/2025
2029 Aava Nami Mission Viejo 1/31/2025
2030 Michael Rotcher Mission ViejoCA 2/3/2025
2031 Morgain Kuipers Modesto CA 1/29/2025
2032 Susan Diaz Modesto CA 1/20/2025
2033 Christine Haniotis Monrovia CA 1/24/2025
2034 Greg Cormier Monrovia CA 1/25/2025
2035 Matt Bryant Monrovia CA 1/27/2025
2036 Sergio Quiroz Monrovia CA 1/28/2025
2037 Suzannah Sandoval Monrovia CA 1/3/2025
2038 Robbi Dominguez Monrovia CA 1/30/2025
2039 Mary Alice Wollam Monrovia CA 1/30/2025
2040 Emilia Richeson Monrovia CA 2/3/2025
2041 Carol Corser Monrovia CA 2/3/2025
2042 Janelle Hendrickson Montclair CA 1/31/2025
2043 Kylie Madden MontebelloCA 1/28/2025
2044 louie mendoza MontebelloCA 1/21/2025
2045 Olivia Mongiello Monterey CA 2/2/2025
2046 Aaliyah Young Monterey ParkCA 1/11/2025
2047 Adrienne Griffin Montrose CA 1/20/2025
2048 Irene Vera-Ramos Montrose CA 12/30/2024
2049 S Ebner Montrose CA 1/12/2025
2050 Warren Farnes Montrose CA 12/24/2024
2051 Susanne Nelson Montrose CA 1/31/2025
2052 karla cohen Montrose CA 2/2/2025
2053 Kelley Jackson Moorpark CA 1/11/2025
2054 Blanka Hartson Moorpark CA 2/3/2025
2055 Robert Corona Murrieta CA 1/26/2025
2056 Sharon Carey Murrieta CA 1/23/2025
2057 Yolanda Duran Murrieta CA 1/11/2025
2058 Andrey Prikazchikov N HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2059 john donato n. hollywoodCA 1/29/2025
2060 John Bacon New York NY 1/30/2025
2061 Claudia Beeman Newport BeachCA 1/22/2025
2062 James Parker Newport BeachCA 1/23/2025
2063 Stephanie Terrin Newport BeachCA 2/1/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2064 Elaheh Maaref Newport coastCA 1/9/2025
2065 Penny Sines Norco CA 2/2/2025
2066 Christen Cutrona North HillsCA 1/7/2025
2067 Donald Scott North HillsCA 1/28/2025
2068 George Richardson North HillsCA 1/10/2025
2069 Linda Lowery North HillsCA 1/19/2025
2070 Mylea H North HillsCA 1/26/2025
2071 Monique De Naba North HillsCA 1/31/2025
2072 Elizabeth Barnes North HillsCA 2/3/2025
2073 Amanda Venegas North HollywoodCA 1/4/2025
2074 Amber Mosero North HollywoodCA 1/19/2025
2075 Anne Dremann North HollywoodCA 1/24/2025
2076 Annette Vitale North HollywoodCA 1/25/2025
2077 Ashley Irwin North HollywoodCA 1/27/2025
2078 Barbara Geib North HollywoodCA 1/20/2025
2079 Carmen Uribe North hollywoodCA 1/20/2025
2080 Caroline Pelaez North HollywoodCA 1/3/2025
2081 Cathy Kraus North HollywoodCA 1/4/2025
2082 Charlie Pirayoo North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2083 Dawn Tamme North HollywoodCA 12/29/2024
2084 Dima Kasouha North HollywoodCA 1/20/2025
2085 Elana Vaysman North HollywoodCA 1/10/2025
2086 Elena Azaryan North hollywoodCA 1/10/2025
2087 Elene Gogiashvili North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2088 Erin Martin North HollywoodCA 1/3/2025
2089 Fred Castillo Jr North HollywoodCA 1/22/2025
2090 Gabriela Azurdia North HollywoodCA 1/8/2025
2091 Jim Z North HollywoodCA 1/7/2025
2092 John Tucker North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2093 Joseluis Morales North HollywoodCA 1/22/2025
2094 Joshua Gomez North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2095 Jusn Barba North HollywoodCA 1/10/2025
2096 kat garcia North HollywoodCA 1/20/2025
2097 Kevin Browning North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2098 Kimberly Pratt North HollywoodCA 1/22/2025
2099 Kimmy Marshall North HollywoodCA 1/10/2025
2100 Linda BROWN North HollywoodCA 1/12/2025
2101 Lisa Winckler North HollywoodCA 12/30/2024
2102 London James North HollywoodCA 1/3/2025
2103 Lorraine Sanchez North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2104 Martin Keegan North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2105 Michelle Heinzman PimentaNorth HollywoodCA 1/19/2025 2106 Miguel Olivares North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2107 Nicole Quinonez North HollywoodCA 1/14/2025
2108 Rhae Ann Theriault North HollywoodCA 1/2/2025
2109 Sara McCullar North HollywoodCA 1/9/2025
2110 Stepan Tovmanyan NORTH HOLLYWOODCA 1/10/2025
2111 Stephanie Urbina North HollywoodCA 12/29/2024
2112 Susan Hokom North HollywoodCA 1/20/2025
2113 Tatyana Voronova North HollywoodCA 1/25/2025
2114 U Darling North HollywoodCA 1/28/2025
2115 Vladimir Vardanyan North HollywoodCA 1/10/2025
2116 Юлия Налимов North HollywoodCA 1/11/2025
2117 Randall Henderson North HollywoodCA 1/30/2025
2118 Paul Hartel North HollywoodCA 1/30/2025
2119 Robin Murray North HollywoodCA 1/30/2025
2120 P. P. Soucek North HollywoodCA 1/30/2025
2121 Marty Bracciotti North HollywoodCA 1/31/2025
2122 Andre Smith North HollywoodCA 1/31/2025
2123 Mary Mallory North HollywoodCA 1/31/2025
2124 Katherine Calderon North HollywoodCA 2/1/2025
2125 Molly Barnett North HollywoodCA 2/1/2025
2126 Irina Khachatryan North HollywoodCA 2/1/2025
2127 Alexies Mariano North HollywoodCA 2/2/2025
2128 Dona Aghabalyan NorthridgeCA 1/10/2025
2129 ISMAEL VALENZUELA JRNorthridgeCA 1/24/2025
2130 Mary Jane NorthridgeCA 1/22/2025
2131 Rosen Tatiana NorthridgeCA 12/27/2024
2132 Sevana Chaharmahali NorthridgeCA 1/11/2025
2133 Steve Wulf NorthridgeCA 1/22/2025
2134 Tina Donaldson NorthridgeCA 1/11/2025
2135 Tavit Meshefedjian NorthrigdeCA 1/20/2025
2136 Mia Beltran Norwalk CA 1/11/2025
2137 Gerhard Georgescu Norwalk CA 2/3/2025
2138 Emily Gnatowsky Oak Park CA 1/4/2025
2139 Kelsey Ostby Oak View CA 1/10/2025
2140 Christi Geary Oakhurst CA 1/11/2025
2141 Allie Price Oakland CA 1/8/2025
2142 Camryn Aeschliman Oakland CA 1/11/2025
2143 Lisa Camarillo Oakland CA 1/31/2025
2144 Elizabeth Herring Ojai CA 1/30/2025
2145 John Pollard Oklahoma CityOK 1/11/2025
2146 Loriann Deavenly Oklahoma CityOK 1/11/2025
2147 Mercedes Lucas Omaha NE 1/11/2025
2148 Chayla Russell Ontario CA 1/11/2025
2149 Robin Fujii Ontario CA 1/17/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2150 Valerie Perez Ontario CA 1/11/2025
2151 alex cervantes Ontario CA 1/31/2025
2152 Brian Choi Orange CA 1/20/2025
2153 Carol Ann Nelson Orange CA 1/26/2025
2154 Lucia Hernandez Orange CA 1/22/2025
2155 Tracy Williams Orange CA 1/19/2025
2156 Pamela Torres Orange CA 1/30/2025
2157 Megan Morelock Orange CA 1/30/2025
2158 Cynthia Sanchez Oxnard CA 1/10/2025
2159 Laura KNOWLES Pacific PalisadesCA 2/1/2025
2160 Robert Haynie Pacific PalisadesCA 2/3/2025
2161 Aaron Johnson Pacoima CA 1/21/2025
2162 Brian Farrell Pacoima CA 1/19/2025
2163 Cheyenne Yanez Pacoima CA 1/11/2025
2164 Diana Lavazarian Pacoima CA 1/9/2025
2165 Noel Coleman Pacoima CA 1/22/2025
2166 Selene Avitia Pacoima CA 1/29/2025
2167 Silva Rich Pacoima CA 1/10/2025
2168 Todd Szabo Pacoima CA 1/19/2025
2169 Ana Aguayo Pacoima CA 1/30/2025
2170 Giselle Lozono Pacoima CA 1/31/2025
2171 Victoria Eufracio Pacoima CA 1/31/2025
2172 Tatevos Nikoyan Pacoima CA 2/1/2025
2173 Bridget Mahoney Palm DesertCA 1/22/2025
2174 Connie Lewis Palm DesertCA 1/23/2025
2175 Rick Seeley Palm SpringsCA 1/22/2025
2176 Cindy Montero Palm SpringsCA 1/30/2025
2177 Daniel Bourgoise Palm SpringsCA 1/30/2025
2178 Ana Calderon Palmdale CA 1/24/2025
2179 Gretchen Myers Palmdale CA 1/8/2025
2180 joe morin Palmdale CA 1/11/2025
2181 Kathryn Robinson Palmdale CA 1/25/2025
2182 Kevin Fernando Palmdale CA 1/10/2025
2183 Mirna Magaly Martinez Palmdale CA 1/4/2025
2184 Robert McWilliams Palmdale CA 1/12/2025
2185 Sandra Gonzalez Palmdale CA 1/26/2025
2186 Daniel Ledbetter Palmdale CA 2/1/2025
2187 Samantha Rohman Palo Alto CA 1/24/2025
2188 Jay Bacon Palos Verdes EstatesCA 1/30/2025
2189 Lingling Rose Palos Verdes EstatesCA 2/1/2025
2190 Laurajean Keller Panorama CityCA 1/30/2025
2191 Oscar Valeriano Panorama CityCA 1/31/2025
2192 Cindy Burnett PANORAMA CITYCA 1/31/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2193 Cris Velásquez Panorama CityCA 2/1/2025
2194 K Sturdevant Pasadena CA 1/30/2025
2195 Marguerite Dessornes Pasadena CA 1/30/2025
2196 Cala Murry Pasadena CA 1/30/2025
2197 Sandy Benghiat Pasadena CA 1/30/2025
2198 Ramona Coronado Pasadena CA 1/31/2025
2199 John Mauricio Pasadena CA 1/31/2025
2200 Cristian Berber Pasadena CA 1/31/2025
2201 Shannon Tymkiw Pasadena CA 1/31/2025
2202 Jon Wang Pasadena CA 2/1/2025
2203 Angela Mattioli Pasadena CA 2/1/2025
2204 Mary Fitzpatrick Pasadena CA 2/2/2025
2205 Pat McLaughlin Pasadena CA 2/2/2025
2206 David Gooler Pasadena Ca.91104CA 1/30/2025
2207 Tina Miller Paso RoblesCA 1/30/2025
2208 Hector Contreras Perris CA 1/11/2025
2209 Kyle Cumper Peru IN 1/25/2025
2210 Michael Flood Phelan CA 12/31/2024
2211 Veronica Sessoms PhiladelphiaPA 1/9/2025
2212 Ailbhe Pascal PhiladelphiaPA 2/3/2025
2213 Tori Lewis PhiladelphiaPA 2/3/2025
2214 Mag p PhiladelphiaPA 2/3/2025
2215 Gonzalo Espinoza Pico RiveraCA 1/23/2025
2216 JASOn Rios Pico RiveraCA 1/21/2025
2217 Jeremy Needleman Pico RiveraCA 1/1/2025
2218 Jessica Rivas Acuna Pico RiveraCA 1/30/2025
2219 Linda Jimenez Pico RiveraCA 1/31/2025
2220 Russell Watkins Pico RiveraCA 2/1/2025
2221 Nabeel Alhasna Placentia CA 1/20/2025
2222 Nancy Watson Placentia CA 2/3/2025
2223 Jamie Odell Placerville CA 2/1/2025
2224 Joan Gross,am Playa del ReyCA 1/30/2025
2225 Timothy Lam PleasantonCA 2/3/2025
2226 Karen Hess Porter RanchCA 1/3/2025
2227 Maral Antekelian Porter RanchCA 1/10/2025
2228 Robert Gibson Ramona CA 1/27/2025
2229 Sue Baker Ramona CA 1/25/2025
2230 Veronica Smith Ramona CA 1/25/2025
2231 Yvonne Polizzi Ramona CA 1/23/2025
2232 Jamal Hannoun Rancho CucamongaCA 1/20/2025
2233 Teagan Wolfe Rancho CucamongaCA 1/22/2025
2234 Cheryl Hoover Rancho CucamongaCA 1/31/2025
2235 Susan Causey Simpson Rancho CucamongaCA 2/3/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2236 Jill Widom Rancho MirageCA 1/11/2025
2237 Lee Lago Rancho Santa MargaritaCA 1/25/2025
2238 ILDIKO TAKATA Rancho Santa MargaritaCA 2/2/2025
2239 linda avila Redlands CA 1/23/2025
2240 DENISE PEREZ Redmond WA 1/6/2025
2241 Cary Herrman Redondo BeachCA 1/10/2025
2242 Colleen Maners Redondo BeachCA 1/10/2025
2243 John Perrotta Redondo BeachCA 1/22/2025
2244 Suzanne Kelly Redondo BeachCA 1/10/2025
2245 Charles Marlowe Redwood CityCA 2/1/2025
2246 Christa Deguzman Reseda CA 1/3/2025
2247 Jennifer Garcia Reseda CA 1/22/2025
2248 karen Ling Reseda CA 1/23/2025
2249 Nell Keller Reseda CA 1/11/2025
2250 Nick Palleroni Reseda CA 12/30/2024
2251 Pam Ellis Reseda CA 1/24/2025
2252 Phung Pham Reseda CA 1/27/2025
2253 Raul Cervantes Reseda CA 1/24/2025
2254 Teresa Castillo Reseda CA 1/17/2025
2255 TOM VARELA Reseda 1/27/2025
2256 Wayne colt Reseda CA 1/22/2025
2257 Stephanie Bernabe Reseda CA 1/30/2025
2258 Mina Marvazi Reseda CA 1/30/2025
2259 Maeis Keshish Reseda CA 2/3/2025
2260 Andrew Carr Richmond VA 2/3/2025
2261 ANDREI SHYMANSKI Riverside CA 1/25/2025
2262 Christopher Hanson Riverside CA 1/24/2025
2263 erica carlson Riverside CA 1/11/2025
2264 Heidi Carlos Riverside CA 1/11/2025
2265 John Pamintuan Riverside CA 1/11/2025
2266 Kathryn Belter Riverside CA 1/28/2025
2267 Matthew S Riverside CA 1/22/2025
2268 Melanie Castro Riverside CA 1/20/2025
2269 Melanie McCalley Riverside CA 1/10/2025
2270 Mitch Apodaca Riverside CA 1/24/2025
2271 Mohammed Shanaah Riverside CA 1/26/2025
2272 Pitchford Pitchford Riverside CA 1/11/2025
2273 Raquel Casillas Riverside CA 1/20/2025
2274 Richard Morey Riverside CA 1/30/2025
2275 Agustina Landeros Riverside CA 1/30/2025
2276 Margaret Soper Riverside CA 1/30/2025
2277 Arlene Robertson Riverside CA 2/1/2025
2278 Maquel Twedell Riverside CA 2/2/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2279 Kelli Ke Riverside CA 2/2/2025
2280 JESSE MCQUARRIE Rohnert ParkCA 1/25/2025
2281 Esmeralda Gomez Rosemead CA 1/10/2025
2282 Joanna Lu Rosemead CA 1/11/2025
2283 Penelope Hernandez Rosemead 1/28/2025
2284 Linda Socia Running SpringsCA 1/24/2025
2285 Cristine Tillinghast SacramentoCA 1/22/2025
2286 Esther Guedea SacramentoCA 1/11/2025
2287 Fa Faz SacramentoCA 1/10/2025
2288 Juli Richardson SacramentoCA 1/24/2025
2289 MaryAnn Paycer SacramentoCA 1/26/2025
2290 Portia Lancaster SacramentoCA 1/25/2025
2291 Thomas W SacramentoCA 1/22/2025
2292 Noreen Finegan SacramentoCA 1/31/2025
2293 Blair Herman SacramentoCA 2/2/2025
2294 Karen Bradley Salinas CA 1/25/2025
2295 Josh Sherrow San AndreasCA 1/27/2025
2296 Niki Trammell San AndreasCA 1/11/2025
2297 Laura Sarley San AntonioTX 1/30/2025
2298 CJ Davis San BernardinoCA 1/20/2025
2299 Crystal Young San BernardinoCA 1/22/2025
2300 Jose Massingill San BernardinoCA 1/24/2025
2301 Kourtnei Webb San BernardinoCA 1/26/2025
2302 Melissa Gomez San BernardinoCA 1/23/2025
2303 Michael NILES San BernardinoCA 1/23/2025
2304 Rene Portillo San BernardinoCA 1/27/2025
2305 Semere Tesfay San BernardinoCA 1/24/2025
2306 Zaida Serpas San BernardinoCA 1/24/2025
2307 Judy Young San BernardinoCA 2/2/2025
2308 Thomas Bourne San Bruno CA 1/27/2025
2309 Lisa Goodlad San ClementeCA 1/22/2025
2310 Jacqueline Jacobs San Diego CA 1/10/2025
2311 Kay Mora San Diego CA 1/29/2025
2312 Ryan Omalley San Diego CA 1/11/2025
2313 Samantha Garcousha San Diego CA 1/25/2025
2314 Arianna Mieres San diego CA 1/30/2025
2315 Roger Lane San Diego CA 1/30/2025
2316 Karen Crosby San Diego CA 1/31/2025
2317 Jeremiah Daluperit San Diego CA 1/31/2025
2318 Chris Armes San Diego CA 2/1/2025
2319 Richard Allen San Diego CA 2/2/2025
2320 Daniella Rosas San Diego CA 2/2/2025
2321 Desiree Newton San DimasCA 1/11/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2322 Lorra Massimi San DimasCA 1/24/2025
2323 Donna McLeary San FernandoCA 1/30/2025
2324 Noemi urquiza San FernandoCA 2/1/2025
2325 Dorothy Niederlander San FranciscoCA 1/8/2025
2326 Freya Simonite San FranciscoCA 1/24/2025
2327 Genevieve Kreter San FranciscoCA 1/10/2025
2328 Noe Fajardo San FranciscoCA 1/20/2025
2329 Sui min Zhong San FranciscoCA 1/24/2025
2330 Raul Guerrero San GabrielCA 1/27/2025
2331 Stephen Lee San GabrielCA 1/3/2025
2332 Toshio Ozawa San GabrielCA 1/3/2025
2333 Vicente Chan San GabrielCA 1/20/2025
2334 Ashton Huebner San GabrielCA 2/3/2025
2335 jack wang San Jose CA 1/26/2025
2336 Laura Brody San Jose CA 1/25/2025
2337 Mijke Roggeveen San Jose CA 1/26/2025
2338 Suzanne Edwards San Jose CA 1/30/2025
2339 Bryant Winchell San Jose CA 1/31/2025
2340 lisa ochoa san jose CA 2/1/2025
2341 Grace Ko San Jose CA 2/3/2025
2342 Susan Moran San Juan CapistranoCA 1/28/2025
2343 Monthie 25 San LeandroCA 1/31/2025
2344 Jinx Robertson San MarcosCA 1/11/2025
2345 Lindsey Huang San MarinoCA 1/22/2025
2346 Antoinette Onorato San Pedro CA 1/11/2025
2347 Deborah Beach San Pedro CA 1/11/2025
2348 tom brayman San Pedro CA 1/26/2025
2349 Nichole Berncich Santa RosaCA 1/11/2025
2350 CHERYL MOLERA SANTA ANACA 1/27/2025
2351 Connie Moteno Santa Ana CA 1/22/2025
2352 Dominique Gonzalez Santa Ana CA 1/20/2025
2353 Emily Lopez Santa Ana CA 1/11/2025
2354 Eric Rodriguez Santa Ana CA 1/23/2025
2355 Jacob Martinez Santa Ana CA 1/22/2025
2356 Jenny Nguyen Santa Ana CA 1/23/2025
2357 Remon Hanna Santa Ana CA 1/20/2025
2358 Stephanie Escobar Santa Ana CA 1/20/2025
2359 Anayeli Cruz-Sanchez Santa Ana CA 1/30/2025
2360 Jade Chamu Santa Ana CA 2/1/2025
2361 Gina DeAngelo Santa BarbaraCA 1/26/2025
2362 Rodger Waldorf Santa ClaraCA 2/3/2025
2363 Harriet Ongele Santa ClaritaCA 1/25/2025
2364 Radha Sagar Santa ClaritaCA 12/30/2024
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2365 Renee Dunn Santa ClaritaCA 1/23/2025
2366 robert rodriguez santa claritaCA 1/22/2025
2367 Yvonne Robertson Santa ClaritaCA 1/6/2025
2368 Brandon Walline Santa ClaritaCA 1/30/2025
2369 Veronica Morales Santa MariaCA 1/23/2025
2370 Bryannah Barker Santa MonicaCA 1/10/2025
2371 Corwyn Braschi Santa MonicaCA 1/11/2025
2372 Kim Blide Santa MonicaCA 1/11/2025
2373 mary rojeski santa monicaCA 1/15/2025
2374 Paul Boyle Santa MonicaCA 12/30/2024
2375 Quinny Baker Santa MonicaCA 1/2/2025
2376 Tim Huffman Santa MonicaCA 1/22/2025
2377 Betty Goodwin Klevan Santa MonicaCA 2/1/2025
2378 Beth Blaney Santa MonicaCA 2/2/2025
2379 Linda Burgess Santa MonicaCA 2/3/2025
2380 Allison Gunter Santa PaulaCA 1/24/2025
2381 Hasmik Shakaryan Santa RosaCA 1/29/2025
2382 Vanessa Hunt Santa RosaCA 1/22/2025
2383 Earl Casden Scarsdale NY 1/11/2025
2384 Alexander Hudson Scottsburg IN 1/11/2025
2385 Kim Mulcahy Scottsdale AZ 12/30/2024
2386 Nancy DeRosier Scottsdale AZ 2/3/2025
2387 Adam Downey Seattle WA 1/11/2025
2388 Clarisa Carlos Seattle WA 1/8/2025
2389 Iris Arciniega Seattle WA 1/21/2025
2390 Megan March Seattle WA 1/10/2025
2391 Michelle Jones Seattle WA 1/26/2025
2392 Roger Xiong Seattle WA 1/8/2025
2393 Sarkis toneryan Seattle CA 1/10/2025
2394 Kelly Chivens Seattle WA 1/30/2025
2395 Kaitlyn Lopez Sierra MadreCA 1/29/2025
2396 Vinny Gregory Sierra MadreCA 2/1/2025
2397 Joya Melissa Simi ValleyCA 1/30/2025
2398 Victoria Sainte-Claire Sonoma CA 2/1/2025
2399 Riley Phelan Sonoma CA 2/2/2025
2400 Sallie Moore Sonoma CA 2/2/2025
2401 Celeste Cook Sonoma CA 2/2/2025
2402 valerie vazquez South GateCA 2/2/2025
2403 Alexandrea Douglas South PasadenaCA 1/30/2025
2404 Harold Abramowitz South PasadenaCA 1/31/2025
2405 Taylor Dark South PasadenaCA 2/1/2025
2406 Shawn Berg Spring TX 1/28/2025
2407 Michelle Jackson Spring valleyCA 1/12/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2408 Paula Mintey SpringvilleUT 2/3/2025
2409 JANINE MARCUS Stevenson RanchCA 2/1/2025
2410 Guy Zents Stockton CA 1/30/2025
2411 Irwin Chen Stockton CA 1/31/2025
2412 Alex Izbicki Studio CityCA 1/11/2025
2413 Allen Walls Studio CityCA 1/11/2025
2414 Brad Warnaar Studio City 1/5/2025
2415 Greg Gregorian Studio CityCA 1/20/2025
2416 Kim Neistadt Studio CityCA 1/31/2025
2417 Bree Ramos Sun ValleyCA 1/3/2025
2418 Karen Russell Sun ValleyCA 1/26/2025
2419 Yudi Bennett Sun ValleyCA 1/30/2025
2420 Kimberly Zimmerman Sunland CA 12/30/2024
2421 Patricia Sternau Sunland CA 12/30/2024
2422 Sandra Ostrom Sunland CA 1/3/2025
2423 Anne Oparowski Sunland CA 2/2/2025
2424 WILLIAM KONAT Sunland CA 2/3/2025
2425 Andrew Keasberry Sunland-TujungaCA 1/16/2025
2426 Andrea McCracken McCracken Surprise AZ 2/3/2025
2427 Alyssa Hyndman Sylmar CA 1/26/2025
2428 Bette Simpson Sylmar CA 1/11/2025
2429 Brianna Rodriguez Sylmar CA 1/20/2025
2430 Claudia Jiménez Sylmar CA 1/27/2025
2431 Gianmarco Lemus Sylmar CA 1/10/2025
2432 John Henry Sylmar CA 1/23/2025
2433 Julianna Groth Sylmar CA 1/23/2025
2434 Rick Gonzalez Sylmar CA 1/29/2025
2435 Will Hyndman Sylmar CA 1/26/2025
2436 Alicia Caudillo Sylmar CA 1/31/2025
2437 Tamera Renn Sylmar CA 2/1/2025
2438 Celeste Gallo Sylmar CA 2/3/2025
2439 Jose Lara Sylmar CA 2/3/2025
2440 John Tirpak Tacoma WA 1/30/2025
2441 Charles B. Tarzana CA 1/17/2025
2442 Marilyn Omann Tarzana CA 1/20/2025
2443 Matthew Donegan Tarzana CA 1/20/2025
2444 Tina Khoshabo Tarzana CA 1/26/2025
2445 Jackie belillti Tarzana CA 1/30/2025
2446 verla dubois Tea SD 1/2/2025
2447 Diana Campbell Tehachapi CA 1/31/2025
2448 Lydia Harnois Temecula CA 1/25/2025
2449 Ruth Villegas Temecula CA 1/10/2025
2450 Helena Peng Temple CityCA 1/10/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2451 Natalia Chandra Temple CityCA 1/21/2025
2452 Nellie McConnell Thermal CA 1/29/2025
2453 Wayne Varnadore ThomastonGA 1/12/2025
2454 Annalise Sean Thousand OaksCA 1/11/2025
2455 Davi Rutenberg Thousand OaksCA 1/22/2025
2456 Hamidreza Malekzadeh KashaniThousand OaksCA 1/24/2025 2457 Heather Wolfe Thousand OaksCA 1/11/2025
2458 Olga Core Thousand OaksCA 1/24/2025
2459 Dan Metcalfe Thousand oaksCA 2/2/2025
2460 Steve Wolf Topanga CA 1/31/2025
2461 Jennifer Carey Topanga CA 2/1/2025
2462 Abram Ramos Torrance CA 1/10/2025
2463 Benjamin Choi Torrance CA 1/14/2025
2464 Grant Lapovich Torrance CA 1/3/2025
2465 Kendell Ebel Torrance CA 1/12/2025
2466 Lisa DiFranco Torrance CA 1/25/2025
2467 shelley zagars Torrance CA 1/9/2025
2468 LISSETTE PONCE Torrance CA 1/30/2025
2469 Faye Rye Torrance CA 2/1/2025
2470 Corinne Sanchez Torrance CA 2/3/2025
2471 Braden Weber Trabuco CanyonCA 1/20/2025
2472 Gary Ridder Trabuco CanyonCA 2/2/2025
2473 Joycelynn Alford Tracy CA 1/8/2025
2474 Dan Watson Tucson AZ 1/22/2025
2475 Ethan Fleitas Tujunga CA 1/28/2025
2476 Luisa Ash Tujunga CA 1/3/2025
2477 Michael Calame Tujunga CA 1/7/2025
2478 Shant Najarian Tujunga CA 1/20/2025
2479 Tina Yessaie Tujunga CA 1/11/2025
2480 yekaterina agamanukian Tujunga CA 1/10/2025
2481 Don Waterbury Tujunga CA 2/2/2025
2482 christina keenan tustin CA 1/3/2025
2483 Elizabeth LeVin Tustin CA 1/25/2025
2484 Andrea Capron Tx CA 1/19/2025
2485 Shing pok Cheung Union CityCA 2/3/2025
2486 Kasem Abo al hajal Upland CA 1/19/2025
2487 Maryann Atamian Upland CA 1/11/2025
2488 Monica Rodriguez Upland CA 1/22/2025
2489 Leslie Bachman Upland CA 1/31/2025
2490 Rena Manns Upland CA 2/1/2025
2491 Kris Fikel Upland CA 2/2/2025
2492 Robert Chang v CA 1/3/2025
2493 martin rivera Vacaville CA 1/26/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2494 Anita Wisch Valencia CA 1/3/2025
2495 Deborah Beltran Valencia CA 1/11/2025
2496 Nathan Guzik Valencia CA 1/11/2025
2497 Natasha Vogt Valley VillageCA 1/30/2025
2498 N Keim Valley VillageCA 2/2/2025
2499 Ararat Amirkhanyan Van Nuys CA 1/30/2025
2500 amy grey Van Nuys CA 1/30/2025
2501 Mudd Patrice Van Nuys 1/30/2025
2502 Alisa Inglett Van Nuys CA 1/31/2025
2503 Christopher Bahls Van Nuys CA 2/1/2025
2504 Allison Gomez Van Nuys CA 2/2/2025
2505 Shacy Gomez Van Nuys CA 2/2/2025
2506 Carolyn Trahan Van Nuys CA 2/3/2025
2507 Ehsan Asgari Van Nuys CA 2/3/2025
2508 CHER SLATER BARLEVI, M. A. Venice CA 1/31/2025
2509 Barbara Echarren Ventura CA 1/25/2025
2510 Gina Marchant Ventura CA 1/22/2025
2511 Juliet Beach Ventura CA 1/22/2025
2512 elizabeth soriano Ventura CA 1/30/2025
2513 Saundra Darata Ventura CA 2/2/2025
2514 Ben Gonzalez Victorville CA 1/24/2025
2515 Jazmine Gonzalez Victorville CA 1/19/2025
2516 LUNA L VICTORVILLECA 1/27/2025
2517 Therease Ward Victorville CA 1/19/2025
2518 Jane Miller Vienna IL 1/20/2025
2519 Angelica Santos Vineland NJ 1/11/2025
2520 Anulka Castillero Virginia BeachVA 1/11/2025
2521 Crystal Vazquez Waco GA 1/6/2025
2522 Halia Benn WashingtonDC 2/3/2025
2523 Jeanne Schuster West CovinaCA 1/30/2025
2524 Doreen Martinez West CovinaCA 1/31/2025
2525 Roger LaGrange West HollywoodCA 1/30/2025
2526 Slade Lin West HollywoodCA 1/31/2025
2527 Andrea Whitfield West HollywoodCA 2/1/2025
2528 Benjamin Park West HollywoodCA 2/1/2025
2529 Rachel Bleemer West HollywoodCA 2/2/2025
2530 Tes Hutchings West SacramentoCA 2/1/2025
2531 Rhonda Stokes WestminsterCA 1/31/2025
2532 Kerin McAlister Westside OR 2/2/2025
2533 Natalie Gonzalez Whittier CA 2/2/2025
2534 Alan Chatman WinchesterCA 2/3/2025
2535 Emmanuel Gomez Winnetka CA 1/30/2025
2536 Fran Rueckert Woodland HillsCA 2/2/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2537 Gabrielle Di Zitti-Moran Woodland HillsCA 2/3/2025 2538 Michele Kapur Yorba LindaCA 1/31/2025
2539 Pamela Sellers Alhambra CA 1/30/2025
2540 Patricia Corrigan Alhambra CA 1/30/2025
2541 Rio Hernandez Alhambra CA 2/2/2025
2542 Gregg Oelker Altadena CA 1/30/2025
2543 Caroline Purvis Altadena CA 1/30/2025
2544 Bethany Bernhard Altadena CA 1/30/2025
2545 KATHY MUSIAL Altadena CA 1/30/2025
2546 Cesar Ortiz Altadena CA 1/24/2025
2547 cheri messerli Altadena CA 12/31/2024
2548 Cloud Backus Altadena CA 12/28/2024
2549 Evelin Guillen Altadena CA 1/26/2025
2550 Judy Svendsen Altadena CA 12/31/2024
2551 Lisa McDaniel Altadena CA 1/4/2025
2552 Brooke Magill Anaheim CA 1/30/2025
2553 Jann Saettel Anaheim CA 1/31/2025
2554 Clayton Powers Anaheim CA 1/17/2025
2555 Dali Higa Anaheim CA 1/11/2025
2556 Kevin Bridenbaker Anaheim CA 1/26/2025
2557 Monique Zyiad Anaheim CA 1/20/2025
2558 Gihan Soliman Arcadia CA 1/31/2025
2559 DAVID ANDERSON Arcadia CA 2/1/2025
2560 Benny Tjandra Arcadia CA 1/11/2025
2561 Bryan Di Leo Arcadia CA 1/25/2025
2562 Deedy Fang Arcadia CA 1/11/2025
2563 Fenrong Lu Arcadia CA 1/20/2025
2564 Juhee Joshi Arcadia CA 1/28/2025
2565 Vanessa Zamago Arleta CA 1/30/2025
2566 Shawn Whitney Arroyo GrandeCA 2/1/2025
2567 Evans Ron Azusa CA 2/1/2025
2568 Lavonne Moralez Azusa CA 1/29/2025
2569 Miryam Prado Azusa CA 1/25/2025
2570 Sarai J Lopez Azusa CA 1/28/2025
2571 Jessica Briseno BakersfieldCA 2/3/2025
2572 Erica Taylor BakersfieldCA 1/21/2025
2573 Annai Rangel Baldwin ParkCA 1/30/2025
2574 Jaime Del Villar Baldwin ParkCA 1/30/2025
2575 Phoebe Noor Baldwin ParkCA 1/23/2025
2576 Sheila Clements Barstow CA 1/19/2025
2577 Art Dagnino Beaumont CA 1/23/2025
2578 Tracie Sublet Beaumont CA 1/11/2025
2579 Jose Soto Bell CA 1/3/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2580 Andrea Alvarez Bell GardensCA 1/24/2025
2581 Ashley Ortiz Bellflower CA 1/24/2025
2582 Chris Montoya Bellflower CA 1/9/2025
2583 Hrant Matosian Bellflower CA 1/10/2025
2584 yamir robles bellflower CA 1/11/2025
2585 Vivienne Yap Berkeley CA 1/20/2025
2586 Deborah Lacusta Beverly HillsCA 1/30/2025
2587 Larry Miller Beverly HillsCA 1/30/2025
2588 George Litzinger Beverly HillsCA 1/30/2025
2589 Lori Karny Beverly HillsCA 1/31/2025
2590 Hannah Montana Beverly HillsLA 2/3/2025
2591 Brent McHenry Beverly HillsCA 1/3/2025
2592 Charlee Bedoe Big Bear CA 1/24/2025
2593 Anthony Norton Boston MA 1/30/2025
2594 Nellie Wallace Brea CA 2/2/2025
2595 Penny Bartosh Brea CA 2/2/2025
2596 Ruby Caster Brooklyn NY 2/1/2025
2597 Wrath Ogbu Buena ParkCA 1/31/2025
2598 Jihoon Ahn Buena ParkCA 2/3/2025
2599 Elisabeth Velasco Buena ParkCA 1/22/2025
2600 James Crites Burbank CA 1/30/2025
2601 Karen Spiegel Burbank CA 1/30/2025
2602 Karen Myer Burbank CA 1/30/2025
2603 Rose Petrossians Burbank 1/30/2025
2604 Monique Medeiros Burbank CA 1/30/2025
2605 Victoria Acevedo burbank CA 1/31/2025
2606 Sudi McCollum Burbank CA 1/31/2025
2607 David Gold Burbank CA 1/31/2025
2608 Shirley Beardsley Burbank CA 1/31/2025
2609 David Gamino Burbank CA 1/31/2025
2610 Maria Basaldu Burbank CA 1/31/2025
2611 Janice Carter Burbank CA 2/1/2025
2612 Madlena Vardanyan Burbank CA 2/1/2025
2613 Jared Ettinger Burbank CA 2/1/2025
2614 Debra Phelps Burbank CA 2/2/2025
2615 Elizabeth Gourjian Burbank CA 2/2/2025
2616 Chris Raymond Burbank CA 2/3/2025
2617 Laura Lewis Burbank CA 2/3/2025
2618 David VanTuyle Burbank CA 2/3/2025
2619 Anita Iverson Burbank CA 1/3/2025
2620 Deborah Lee Chill Burbank CA 1/4/2025
2621 Ersilia Pompilio Burbank CA 1/26/2025
2622 Jean Byers Burbank CA 1/28/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2623 Joseph Braus Burbank CA 1/21/2025
2624 Lucia Patino Burbank CA 1/2/2025
2625 Marissa Danelle Burbank CA 1/3/2025
2626 Marlo Flanagan Burbank CA 1/8/2025
2627 Martina Boskova Burbank CA 1/11/2025
2628 Medik Josephbeg Burbank CA 1/14/2025
2629 Nancy Worsham Burbank CA 1/4/2025
2630 Teclay Tesfay Burbank CA 1/24/2025
2631 Tina Van Curen Burbank CA 1/1/2025
2632 Trent Corona Burbank CA 1/29/2025
2633 Wendy Murrill Burbank CA 1/4/2025
2634 Kristine Lee Calabasas CA 2/2/2025
2635 Diana Colvin Calabasas CA 2/2/2025
2636 Julie Covey Camarillo CA 1/11/2025
2637 Mary Hatto Camarillo CA 1/11/2025
2638 cheryl dimont Canoga ParkCA 2/2/2025
2639 Martha N Canoga ParkCA 1/10/2025
2640 Hannah Jack Canyon CountryCA 1/31/2025
2641 Brennan Miller Canyon CountryCA 1/11/2025
2642 Emily Caste Canyon CountryCA 1/21/2025
2643 Gigi Montiforte Canyon CountryCA 1/26/2025
2644 Shannon Woodland Canyon CountryCA 1/3/2025
2645 Stephen Rhodes Canyon CountryCA 1/11/2025
2646 Millie Paul Carlsbad CA 1/30/2025
2647 James Hugar Carlsbad CA 1/11/2025
2648 Anthony Kearns Cedar Rapids 1/11/2025
2649 Christina H Cerritos CA 1/30/2025
2650 Travis Leung Cerritos CA 1/31/2025
2651 Jeff Maldonado Cerritos CA 1/17/2025
2652 Max Bonilla Cerritos CA 1/11/2025
2653 Gloría Lewis ChatsworthCA 1/31/2025
2654 Delia Del Papa ChatsworthCA 2/2/2025
2655 Leila zare CHATSWORTHCA 1/22/2025
2656 Susan Williams Chevy ChaseMD 1/30/2025
2657 Claudine Santos Chevy ChaseMD 1/19/2025
2658 Jeremy Medley Chicago IL 1/3/2025
2659 Lauren Pollock Chicago IL 1/7/2025
2660 Sandra Llangari Chicago IL 1/11/2025
2661 Venta Su Chino CA 1/30/2025
2662 Marcelo Delatorre Chino 1/31/2025
2663 Shannon Barrett Chino HillsCA 2/3/2025
2664 Allen Chang Chino HillsCA 1/21/2025
2665 Carmela Lucatero Chino HillsCA 1/29/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2666 Zoe Chiu Chino HillsCA 1/11/2025
2667 Donna Gagnon Chula VistaCA 2/3/2025
2668 Clayton Smithline Citrus HeightsCA 1/11/2025
2669 Name City State Signed On
2670 Angelina Ojeda Claremont CA 1/11/2025
2671 Laurel Fleury Claremont CA 1/28/2025
2672 Nicholas Chavez Claremont CA 1/11/2025
2673 Todd Torbensen Claremont CA 1/27/2025
2674 Joya Salas Claremont CA 1/30/2025
2675 David Hinojosa Colton CA 1/25/2025
2676 Rosemarie Cravey Columbia SC 2/2/2025
2677 Ivette Munoz Compton CA 1/10/2025
2678 MANA INDASTREEZ INKA CUZCOCompton CA 1/29/2025
2679 Sean McCarthy Compton CA 12/27/2024
2680 Shakayla Thomas Compton CA 1/26/2025
2681 Yeretzi Flores Compton 1/29/2025
2682 Elgin Trammell Compton CA 1/31/2025
2683 Erik Anonas Corona CA 1/29/2025
2684 Jennifer Garcia Corona CA 1/24/2025
2685 Mariano Garatti Corona CA 1/11/2025
2686 Samantha Escobedo Corona CA 2/2/2025
2687 Catherine Ray Corona CA 2/2/2025
2688 Heather Garcia Corona CA 2/3/2025
2689 Thierry Hall Corona del MarCA 1/30/2025
2690 Madi Swart Costa MesaCA 1/25/2025
2691 Sabrina Willis Costa MesaCA 1/11/2025
2692 Sydney Costley Costa MesaCA 1/23/2025
2693 Genevieve Holthe Covina CA 1/10/2025
2694 Manuel Cruz Covina CA 1/10/2025
2695 oscar mayorga Covina CA 1/11/2025
2696 Rosio Villa Covina CA 1/25/2025
2697 Celeste Radusky Culver CityCA 1/21/2025
2698 Jill Davine Culver CityCA 1/30/2025
2699 Brenda Acosta Daly City CA 1/11/2025
2700 Fatima Cardenas Denver CO 1/11/2025
2701 Barbara Bernheim Denver CO 2/2/2025
2702 helen liqiu xia Diamond barCA 1/11/2025
2703 yundo Hu Diamond BarCA 1/11/2025
2704 Raven Perez Downey CA 1/3/2025
2705 Martha K Jauregui Downey CA 1/30/2025
2706 Robert Landers Downey CA 2/2/2025
2707 Sal Piscitelli downey CA 2/3/2025
2708 Alice Cristofaro Duarte CA 1/28/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2709 Catheline Hermida Duarte CA 1/29/2025
2710 Enrique Alcantara Duarte CA 1/29/2025
2711 Jaime Pardo Duarte CA 1/29/2025
2712 Manuel Robles Duarte CA 1/29/2025
2713 William Moreno Duarte CA 1/12/2025
2714 Sean Villacrucis Duarte CA 1/30/2025
2715 Veronica Tsang Duarte CA 1/30/2025
2716 Dalila Calderon Duarte CA 2/1/2025
2717 Ana Santaolalla Eagle RockCA 1/26/2025
2718 Larry Ravelo East Los AngelesCA 1/11/2025
2719 Yousif Yousif El Cajon CA 1/31/2025
2720 Robert Jacquot El Cajon CA 2/2/2025
2721 Mary Herrmann El Dorado HillsCA 1/12/2025
2722 C. b. T El Dorado HillsCA 1/11/2025
2723 Daniel Roman El Monte CA 1/11/2025
2724 Elieth Kugelman El Monte CA 1/12/2025
2725 Michael Gallardo El Monte CA 1/10/2025
2726 Susan Hubert El Monte CA 1/25/2025
2727 Marybel Magallanes El Monte CA 2/2/2025
2728 Brian L Duncan Brian L Duncan Elkhart IN 1/10/2025 2729 John Lestina Elmhurst IL 1/9/2025
2730 Jennifer Ayon Elverta CA 2/1/2025
2731 Bobbie CandlerBuyalos Encino CA 1/16/2025
2732 Hillary Ostrow Encino CA 1/21/2025
2733 Hoori Mordi Encino CA 1/10/2025
2734 Sterling Sterling Encino CA 1/12/2025
2735 Alex Morales Encino CA 1/30/2025
2736 DAWN GARDNER Escondido CA 1/11/2025
2737 Suzanne Lambert Fallbrook CA 1/31/2025
2738 Teresa Skinner FarmingtonMI 1/11/2025
2739 Dick Buttkisser Fontana CA 1/26/2025
2740 Jessy Roblero Fontana CA 1/20/2025
2741 Natalie Villalobos Fontana CA 1/26/2025
2742 Sallt Silva Fontana CA 1/24/2025
2743 Kevin Hanson Fontana CA 1/31/2025
2744 Lydia Gandara Fontana CA 2/1/2025
2745 Lillian Gerveler Fort MadisonIA 1/11/2025
2746 Erin Flynn-Clark Fountain ValleyCA 1/27/2025
2747 Michele Williams Fountain ValleyCA 1/11/2025
2748 Teresa Barragán Fresno CA 1/23/2025
2749 Mike Weber Fresno CA 1/31/2025
2750 Anthony Ortiz Fullerton CA 1/25/2025
2751 eRNEST zINGG Fullerton CA 1/30/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
Petition to Deny Glendale Garden Homes EIR Appeal: Feb 3, 2005 5PM 2752 Anna Hickey GainesvilleGA 1/11/2025
2753 Richard Painter Galt CA 1/27/2025
2754 Bojie Custodio Garden GroveCA 1/29/2025
2755 Lida Assadi Garden GroveCA 1/31/2025
2756 LEI ZHANG Garden GroveCA 2/3/2025
2757 Argenise Gonzalez Gardena CA 1/28/2025
2758 Argenise Gonzalez Gardena CA 1/28/2025
2759 Lily Pan Gardena CA 1/27/2025
2760 Sharon Asamoto Gardena CA 1/11/2025
2761 Sweetheart Cotton Gardena CA 1/23/2025
2762 Fendi Taeidi Gilbert AZ 1/10/2025
2763 Maria Abadesco Glen Ellen CA 1/30/2025
Petition List 2 3 25 5 PM
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: 1303-1315 N. Central Ave Proposed Development Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:38:28 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
-----Original Message-----
From: Vic Pallos <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 4:54 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]
>; Brotman, Daniel
<[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Michele DiNardo <[email protected]>
Subject: 1303-1315 N. Central Ave Proposed Development
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
To the Glendale City Council:
Demanding a thorough EIR on this development is essential for the sake of the neighborhood and the neighbors. You are elected to represent WE THE PEOPLE. Now, please do what you are elected for!
Thank you!
Vic Pallos
658 Arden Ave.
Glendale, CA 91202
Vic Pallos
Cell: (310) 890-5167 voice/text
e-mail: [email protected]
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:45:24 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Joemy Wilson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 1:36 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>
Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear Mayor Asatryan and City Councilmembers,
I am writing to urge you to vote NO tonight on bypassing the EIR for Glendale Garden Homes. The proposed project is massive and totally out of scale for the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Joemy Wilson
Glendale resident/homeowner since 1986
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: 1303-3015 Central Ave. EIR requirement
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:48:09 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
-----Original Message-----
From: Carolyn West <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:02 AM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]
>; Brotman, Daniel
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: 1303-3015 Central Ave. EIR requirement
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
We support EIR. Please require this.
2 voters here.
This property is near last vestige of sanity in central Glendale area. The city desperately needs to save historic properties.
We support the views if TGHS.
Sent from my iPhone
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: 1303-3015 Central Ave. EIR requirement
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:47:36 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
-----Original Message-----
From: Carolyn West <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:35 AM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]
>; Brotman, Daniel
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: 1303-3015 Central Ave. EIR requirement
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
We support EIR. Please require this.
2 voters here.
This property is near last vestige of sanity in central Glendale area. The city desperately needs to save historic properties.
We support the views if TGHS.
Sent from my iPhone
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Agenda item #9.a.- Deny the Appeal
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:44:48 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Kathryn Engel <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 1:43 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda item #9.a.- Deny the Appeal
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Please deny the developer's appeal for the Glendale Garden Homes. Please follow the City's legislated process and require a full EIR for the proposed project.
Thank you.
Kathryn Engel
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: van Muyden, Gillian
Cc: Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: Agenda Item 9a tomorrow
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:24:17 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Joanna Pringle <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 6:57 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Cc: Calvert, Bradley <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]> Subject: Agenda Item 9a tomorrow
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear Mayor Asatryan and City Councilmembers,
Please uphold Community Director Bradley Calvert’s decision to require an EIR (Environmental Impact Report) for the proposed project at Glendale Garden Homes.
There is plenty of evidence that the proposed project will significantly change the environment. An EIR is vital to informing all the decision-makers, and ultimately you, about potential impacts before it’s too late.
Thank you,
Joanna Pringle
Joanna Pringle
1555 Hillside Drive
Mobile 213-509-0005
From: Pruett, Cassandra
To: Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: City Council Meeting: 2/4/25 - Appeal Case No. PAPP-004151-2024 / 1303 1315 North Central Avenue Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 4:24:10 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Public comment re: 2/4 council hearing. It was emailed directly to council.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: ALEX ROMAN <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Brotman <[email protected]>; Ara Najarian <[email protected]>; Vartan Gharpetian <[email protected]>; Ardy Kassakhian <[email protected]>; Elen Asatryan <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 at 03:57:10 PM PST
Subject: City Council Meeting: 2/4/25 - Appeal Case No. PAPP-004151-2024 / 1303 1315 North Central Avenue
Hello Everyone,
I would like to add my voice regarding this appeal towards the Glendale Gardens Apartments build in 1957 up for Demolition.
I do not support this at all. I feel the last 15 years in Glendale has seen an incredible amount of new Apartments & Condos build. The Downtown area has shifted in a way that I feel it's getting more overwhelming and taking away from the City's aesthetics.
On one level, we're saying there's a housing crisis and on another level, the cost to rent a place in Glendale is becoming more and more unbearable especially with these new structures driving up the rental market.
I'm trying to find a job in Glendale and shift out of the Entertainment Business, but look at how many commercial businesses have shut down. The office buildings in Glendale still don't appear to be at full capacity. Many jobs offered in Glendale barely cover the rent let alone other living expenses. An individual needs to have more than one job. In regards to Hollywood, we're going on year three with the downturn of production in LA. There's simply not enough shows for the amount of Cast & Crew available.
Last year, I barely made above poverty level. Next month, my rent increases. Now it seems the owner wants to do yearly increases because he's saying the trash pickup, recycling, gas, taxes, water, and other expenses keeps going up.
I live in an apartment with no air conditioning, no parking, and no pets allowed. I want to make a change, but I can't right now. The rents in Glendale and what's offered is getting higher and higher. This proposal is another huge disruption to the neighborhood. This complex does have historical significance. I think we've allowed our landscape to be overrun by Developers contributing to the the cost of living increases while diminishing the beauty of the city.
Thank you all for your time,
Alex Roman
818-749-3338
Cassandra Pruett | Senior Planner
Community Development
633 E. Broadway, Room 103, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 937-8186
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: EIR for Proposed 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. Development Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:45:33 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Importance: High
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Laurel Whitcomb-Perlman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 1:24 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>
Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: EIR for Proposed 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. Development Importance: High
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Mayor Asatryan and Councilmembers:
I’m writing to express my support for the city staff’s recommendation for an Environmental Impact Report regarding the proposed development at 1303 - 1315 North Central Ave. Great numbers of your constituents are concerned about the proposed 149-unit project and the significant impact it would have on traffic, density and the quality of life for residents in the surrounding neighborhoods, but as EIR is necessary to pull all of the facts into focus.
That being said, I’m one of many residents who walks past the existing garden apartment complex on a regular basis — for morning exercise, when grocery shopping at the nearby Ralphs or frequenting Baskin Robbins or Pet Express across from Ralphs. I also drive Central Ave. on a regular basis when accessing the 134 Freeway. I know how busy these streets are at multiple times of the day, and while my concerns for the proposed project are many, the increased traffic and inadequate proposed parking spaces for the development are my greatest concerns. Overnight parking on adjacent and nearby streets is already at a premium and traffic in this area is already congested during commute times. I would be most interested in the findings of an EIR and whether it bears out these concerns.
Thank you for your consideration!
Best regards,
Laurel Whitcomb Perlman
1305 N. Louise St.
Glendale, CA 91207
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: EIR Required - Garden Apts
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:34:09 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
-----Original Message-----
From: A Robins <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:01 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]
>; Brotman, Daniel
<[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]> Subject: EIR Required - Garden Apts
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Please require them to follow protocol!!!!!!!!
No shortcuts.
A very concerned 4 decade resident Adam's Hill
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Feb. 4th City Council Agenda Item 9a
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:46:49 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
01.22.25 -Press Release -Updated -Misleading Claims.docx
01.22.25 -Press Release -Updated -Reckless Development..docx
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 12:43 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Platt, Jay <[email protected]>; Pruett, Cassandra <[email protected]>; Shant Tokatyan <[email protected]> Subject: Feb. 4th City Council Agenda Item 9a
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Please include the following two press releases in the files for the case to fight the developer's appeal to bypass the EIR for the proposed development at 1302-1315 N. Central Ave., Glendale, CA 91202 -Glendale Garden Homes.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth
818-264-8661
1 Date: 01/22/2025
Community Outcry: Massive Housing Project Threatens Small Glendale Neighborhood, Sacrificing History, the Environment, and Livability [Glendale, CA] — A proposed high-density apartment comp lex in Glendale threatens to destroy a cherished post-war, Mid-century Modern style housing community, sparking outrage among residents, historic advocates, and environmentalists. The project highlights concern about recent state laws enabling developers to bypass local decision-making, raising fears that profits are being prioritized over community welfare, historic preservation, and environmental sustainability.
A Threat to Local History and Livability
The historic Glendale Garden Homes complex at 1303-1315 North Central Avenue was constructed in 1957, during the post-World War II era. It stands as a testament to the Garden Apartment type, which was an innovative urban density solution that was designed to balance community needs with environmental preservation. Built at a time of rapid population growth, it addressed housing shortages while emphasizing green space and neighborhood livability — the same challenges facing California today. The proposed development would erase this legacy, causing:
The destruction of over 90 mature trees critical for the local ecosystem, climate resilience and air quality.
The permanent loss of nesting areas for birds and wildlife, compounding ecological damage.
The erasure of low-scale, architecturally significant buildings that harmonize with their surroundings.
Overshadowing the adjacent single and multi-family neighborhoods, many of which represent similar post-war historic character.
Increased overcrowding, straining local infrastructure, bringing increased traffic and diminishing the livability of the surrounding community.
State Overreach vs. Local Control
Recent state laws enabled developers to bypass critical local zoning restraints, stripping cities of their ability to manage growth responsibly, in ways that respect local neighborhood character and environmental limitations.
Despite strong design recommendations provided by the Glendale Design Review Board to reduce the impact of the project’s height, scale and mass, the developer has not only ignored their advice, but has steadily increased the size of the project over time:
Current number of units: 37
2004: Initially proposed as 89 units.
2023: Increased to 131 units.
2 2025: Current proposal is 149 units, dwarfing the neighborhood’s size and the existing post-war buildings.
Of the 149 units, 19—only the minimum requir ed—would be designated as "covenanted affordable units." By meeting this requirement, the developer qualifies for a density bonus under the new state Density Bonus laws, enabling a much larger project than would otherwise be permitted. This raises community concerns that the project may be leveraging the law to push through a development of an enormous scale that would not otherwise be approved.
City of Glendale staff reviewed the proposed project and concluded that preparation of an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) is required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because of the project’s expected impacts to the environment. The EIR process is designed to analyze the development’s far-reaching consequences, including strained infrastructure, traffic problems, and demolition of the historic resource identified by City of Glendale staff. The developer is asking to be officially excused from the EIR requirement in an appeal before Glendale City Council.
The City Council meeting where the appeal will be considered in on February 4th, 2025 at 6PM (date subject to change). If the developer’s appeal were to be granted, it would green-light reckless and irresponsible development, eliminating future input from citizens or the city regarding this project.
Residents have expressed alarm at the disregard for the City’s carefully cultivated urban planning principles and bypassing legal CEQA requirements.
Misleading Claims and Escalating Scale
The developer claims that the project will address housing needs, yet similar, recent nearby high- density developments have historically increased rents, worsening affordability issues rather than solving them.
Community members have raised concerns that the architectural renderings minimize the project's size and visual impacts through the use of specific perspectives and rendering techniques. Depictions of green spaces appear to suggest open areas that may not align with the actual plans, while overshadowing effects on neighboring residences are conspicuously omitted.
Furthermore, the developer has failed to release a critical 3-D white model, which would provide an accurate representation of the project's true scale and mass within the surrounding buildings and their context.
A Windfall for Developers, a Loss for the Community
The developer now stands to make millions in profit. Yet, they have offered no concessions that would reduce the project’s impact or would benefit the community.
A Call to Action
3 Residents are urged to attend the February 4th, 2025 meeting at 6 PM to oppose the project and preserve Glendale’s rights, history, and environment. This fight isn’t just about one development.
It’s about standing up for our city and preserving its values, history, and livability for generations to come. A petition is available through the website: www.saveglendalegardens.org.
About Save Glendale Gardens
Save Glendale Gardens is a community initiative dedicated to preserving California’s cultural and architectural heritage while promoting responsible, sustainable, and equitable development.
For more information, please contact the Save Glendale Gardens team through the website.
Elizabeth Luce; a volunteer for the Save Glendale Gardens project
1 Date: 01/22/2025
Misleading Claims and Escalating Profits: A Threat to Local History and Neighborhood Livability
Glendale, CA — A proposed high-density apartment comp lex in Glendale has sparked public outrage for prioritizing profits over community welfare, environmental sustainability, and historic preservation. This project threatens to permanently erase a neighborhood rich in history and green space, undermining the values that have long defined Glendale’s special character.
A Project Built on Misleading Claims
The developer asserts that the project will address housing density concerns, but similar developments in the area have caused rent hikes, worsened affordability and driven out longtime renters. Instead of solving housing challenges, the project threatens to displace residents, the well-planned small community, increase overcrowding and traffic, strain local infrastructure, diminish the livability of surrounding neighborhoods, and exacerbate social inequities.
Architectural renderings provided by the developer have raised concerns over distorting the true impact of the project:
Forced perspectives and rendering techniques minimize the size and visual mass of the proposed buildings.
Misleading depictions of green spaces create the illusion of open areas that do not exist in the plans.
Overshadowing impacts on nearby residences are conveniently omitted. A critical 3-D white model, which would accurately reflect the project’s size and scale, and show it in context with examples of the surrounding neighborhood, has not been shared with the public.
Ignoring City Recommendations, Escalating Neighborhood Scale The Glendale of City has provided recommendations which would ensure a more balanced design, but the developer has ignored these suggestions. Instead of listening to the Design Review Board, the project has grown significantly over time:
Current number of units: 37
2004: Proposed at 89 units.
2023: Proposed project expanded to 131 units.
2025: Proposal ballooned to 149 units, completely disregarding City's recommendations to reduce the proposed size and scale.
This unchecked escalation underscores blatant disregard for Glendale’s established planning principles.
2 Profit over People
The property would become a multimillion-dollar windfall for the already wealthy developer.
Yet, the applicants and their lawyers have made no concessions that would offset the project’s devastating impacts on Glendale’s infrastructure, environment, and community.
Call to Action
Glendale Garden Homes, the historic resource at risk, is an architect-designed, Mid-century Modern complex at 1303-1315 North Central Avenue that exemplifies the garden apartment type. It is an increasingly rare instance of post-war urban planning that balanced livability and environmental harmony. It also represents a significant neighborhood green space, with over 90 mature trees and brimming with wildlife. Built at a time of rapid population growth, it addressed housing shortages while emphasizing green space and neighborhood livability — some of the same challenges facing California today.
Losing the Glendale Garden Homes would not only erase recognized and significant component of Glendale’s history but would set a troubling precedent for unchecked development across the City and elsewhere in California.
Local architectural historian Francesca Smith has confirmed that the Glendale Garden Homes complex is eligible for listing in the local register under both associative and design criteria. It only needs to qualify under only one category to be considered historically significant.
Residents are urged to attend the February 4
th, 2025 meeting at 6 PM to oppose the project and
preserve Glendale’s rights, history, and environment. This fight isn’t just about one development.
It’s about standing up for our city and preserving its values, history, and livability for generations to come. A petition is available through the website: www.saveglendalegardens.org.
About Save Glendale Gardens
Save Glendale Gardens is a community initiative dedicated to preserving California’s cultural and architectural heritage while promoting responsible, sustainable, and equitable development.
For more information, please contact the Save Glendale Gardens team through the website.
Elizabeth Luce; a volunteer for the Save Glendale Gardens project
Commented [FS1]: What is the source of that
informaƟon? It is preƩy specific.
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes- 1303-1315 North Central Avenue, EIR Appeal PAPP-004151-2024, City Council Meeting February 4, 2025
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:19:43 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
F Smith letter to CC 2 3 25.pdf
Attachment 1- DPR GGH.pdf
Attachment 2- CV FS 2025.pdf
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Francesca Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 5:35 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Platt, Jay <[email protected]>; Andrew Salimian <[email protected]>; Pruett, Cassandra <[email protected]>; Susan Brandt- Hawley <[email protected]>
Cc: The Glendale Historical Society <[email protected]> Subject: Glendale Garden Homes- 1303-1315 North Central Avenue, EIR Appeal PAPP-004151-2024, City Council Meeting February 4, 2025
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Hi all,
Please find my letter attached regarding the above-referenced project, with two attachments appended to this message (pdf files). It requests that you deny the project appeal.
Kindly ensure that all three of the attachments are received and are included in the project Administrative Record.
Best wishes,
Francesca Smith
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:39:53 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 3:44 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>
Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: Glendale Garden Homes
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
I support the city staff’s recommendation and the position of the Glendale Historical Society and ask that you require an EIR prior to further action at 1303-1315 N.
Central Avenue. Our architectural resources must be preserved. Please deny the appeal by the project proponent. Thank you.
Bob Nicksin
[email protected]
818-795-2093
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:39:37 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Roy Oldenkamp <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 4:27 PM
To: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: Glendale Garden Homes
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
For Reference, sent to all five Glendale Council Members:
I urge you to deny the waiver for a EIR on the historic Glendale Garden Homes. I second the City staff recommendation so that all factors will be considered. Particularly after the recent fires, we have lost many vestiges of our past: let's put full consideration into this site.
Sincerely,
Roy R. Oldenkamp
Founding Member
WHPA
West Hollywood Preservation Alliance
www.westhollywoodpreservationalliance.org
Cell (323) 875-5657
Many Thanks,
Roy
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:24:46 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Mary Baldwin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 6:30 PM
To: Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Patty Silversher <[email protected]>; 'Rondi Home' <[email protected]>; Stephen Meek <[email protected]>; Ingrid Wilcox <[email protected]>
Subject: Glendale Garden Homes
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear City Council.
In six decades of residency. rarely have I seen the City so unified against a proposed development. Please take note that all sections of the city are hoping to save Glendale Gardens. Please note that from Adams Hill to Chevy Chase Canyon, to Glenoaks Canyon to Montrose and to Brockmont and Rossmoyne. No one wants this to be destroyed. I suggest you hear the collective angst from all sections of the City and do the right thing.
This is a non partisan , call to save part of the City's architectural history. We have lost so many beautiful, historic buildings due to the fires in Altadena and Pacific Palisades. Glendale should now pay attention and protect the precious few that are left here. This is a remarkable part of our Glendale story. Demand the EIR.
Thank you.
Mary Baldwin
Adams Hill
Glendale CA 91205
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: Glendale Garden Homes
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:21:57 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Taleen Barsoumian <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 9:22 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Pruett, Cassandra <[email protected]> Subject: Glendale Garden Homes
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
P.O. Box 4173 Glendale CA 91202
www.GlendaleHistorical.org
February 1, 2025
Mayor Elen Asatryan and Members of City Council
Glendale City Hall
613 E Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206
RE: City Council Meeting February 4, 2025, Case PAPP-004151-2024 Glendale Garden Homes, 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue
Dear Mayor Asatryan and Members of the City Council:
On behalf of The Glendale Historical Society, which has more than 1,000 members, we wish to express our support of City staff’s recommendation for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed development project involving Glendale Garden Homes.
Given the historic significance of the property, we believe that a preparation of an EIR is essential to ensure that all relevant environmental factors are thoroughly considered.
Please include this letter in the administrative record for the project.
With regards,
The Glendale Historical Society Board of Directors
cc: Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
Cassandra Pruett, project planner
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Prepare EIR for Glendale Garden Homes N 1303 - 1015 Central Ave.
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:47:03 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Pam <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 12:26 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: Prepare EIR for Glendale Garden Homes N 1303 - 1015 Central Ave.
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Honorable Glendale Council Members,
As a longtime Glendale resident and advocate for preserving historic buildings, I ask that you please support the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed development on 1303 - 1315 N Central Ave.
Demolishing the existing 37 unit historic buildings with a six-story 149 unit apartment building would:
eliminate a historic structure - with a massive complex bring into the area more traffic, more congestion
create an overbearing building much taller than the surrounding area
Please do the right thing and support getting the EIR prepared.
Thank you
Pam Vasquez
Rossmoyne Resident
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Preservation Alert: Glendale Garden Homes N 1303 - 1315 Central Ave.
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:43:57 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] | GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us! From: Pat Turner <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:23 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Preservation Alert: Glendale Garden Homes N 1303 - 1315 Central Ave.
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender. [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
CC the City Clerk: [email protected]
Hello,
I would llike to send you all a notice to DENY the appeal for the EIR WAIVER requested for the GLENDALE GARDEN HOMES.
Density is already a problem in DT Glendale, so I second the City staff’s recommendation, emphasizing the importance of thoroughly considering all factors due to the historic significance of the site.
I have lived in my 1912 home in Glendale since 1993 and am a member of the GHS and I see no reason for a building that huge in the existing neighborhood. I also sent a note via CHANGE.org.
THANK YOU for your consideration.
Pat Turner
1110 Newby
Glendale, CA 91201
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: SAVE Glendale Garden Homes
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:42:07 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Gamboa, Patricia <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:46 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>
Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: SAVE Glendale Garden Homes
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
To the City Council of Glendale, California,
I was born and raised in Glendale and have seen countless changes to the city over decades. Some of the worst changes took place in the late 70’s when many shops on Brand were taken over by high rise buildings. I understand progress, but it was a lot in a short amount of time. In fact, I work in one of the high rise buildings (800 N. Brand) that use to house the little Eagle’s Club building where my Quinceanera was held. Then came the malls. More homes razed.
In the last 15 years, I really started to become disappointed over how during the long drawn out building phases before, during, and after the crash of 2008 started to make all of downtown Glendale unrecognizable. I understand the need for housing, but rent in many of these spaces is not affordable and the traffic it has brought to the city is incredibly sad. That’s not even addressing how much traffic has gotten worse with the Americana coming in the early 2000’s. We are no longer a ‘bedroom’ community. Fine. I still raised my kids here and bought a home. All along understanding that money talks the loudest at City Hall.
But now, I must raise my voice against demolishing the Glendale Garden Homes. I lived nearby on Dryden for 11 years and the Ralphs down the street was my regular market. I loved walking the neighborhood and those apartments are significant and historical landmarks as well as adding beautiful character to the street. If torn down, I guarantee traffic will increase on Central Avenue and the atmosphere will be disrupted by an overcrowded building that will squeeze in as many parking spaces underground as possible. Maybe the homeowners going up into the foothills and surrounding areas will influence this decision to hopefully NOT tear it down.
Time and time again, developers have come in, purchased old buildings, torn them down and built giant complexes. I urge you to vote against demolition.
Patricia Gamboa
Glendale Native
[email protected]
818-434-6399
-----
Glendale Garden Homes
Urgent Preservation Alert!
The Glendale Historical Society has sent a letter to City Council supporting the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed development on 1303 - 1315 N. Central Avenue. The developer has requested a waiver of the EIR in their plan to demolish the 37-unit historic Glendale Garden Homes and build a six-story 149-unit apartment building.
Patricia Gamboa | Senior Associate Director, Development Foundation Department
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd., Mailstop 29 | Los Angeles, CA 90027 Ph: 323.361.2160 C: 818-434-6399| Fax: 323.361.8651 | [email protected] CHLA.org/GiveLA
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original message.
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: FW: Support of EIR for Glendale Garden Homes - 1303 - 1315 N. Central Avenue Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:47:49 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Kama Hayes <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:16 AM
To: Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>
Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Support of EIR for Glendale Garden Homes - 1303 - 1315 N. Central Avenue
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear readers:
I urge you to require an Environmental Impact Report for the Glendale Garden Homes on North Central Avenue in Glendale.
Glendale, like all of Los Angeles County, must preserve it's period and vintage homes and apartment complexes!!!
In addition, allowing any developer to not get an Environmental Impact Report feels biased and feels like a rush to judgment with privilege in allowing developers to do whatever they want. They can tear down anything they want, and build anything they want, without any consideration of the neighborhood and environment.
A tower building in this location is a deplorable idea and should be stopped at all costs.
I moved to Glendale because it isn't Hollywood, and is a charming, early California, mostly low-profile city. To put a tower in this residential area would be just the worst thing in the world.
Please vote YES to make sure to require an EIR at 1305-1315 N. Central Avenue. Preserve this complex!!!
Sincerely,
Kama Hayes
515 E. Chestnut Street, 91205
Kama Hayes | Art Department Coordinator, Local 871
H-Town / tv+
(213) 505-3285 (cell)
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Cortes, Karen
Subject: FW: Susan Causey, Glendale Garden Homes
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:45:06 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
PastedGraphic-1.png
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] | GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us! From: Michele DiNardo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 1:42 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Platt, Jay <[email protected]>; Pruett, Cassandra <[email protected]> Subject: Susan Causey, Glendale Garden Homes
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Hello Mayor and City Council Members:
Please see the note below from Susan Causey, whose father, half of the contractors Causey & Causey, were two brothers who built Glendale Garden Homes and were later its owners.
Please include this message in the Administrative Record for the project.
Thank you.
From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: van Muyden, Gillian; Calvert, Bradley; Cortes, Karen Subject: Fwd: Supporting City staff"s recommendation of an EIR for the proposed development of Glendale Garden Homes property
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 9:10:38 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Get Outlook for iOS
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Paula Sigman Lowery <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 5:53:47 PM
To: Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: Supporting City staff's recommendation of an EIR for the proposed development of Glendale Garden Homes property
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear Glendale City Council Members,
I am a resident of the neighborhood surrounding the Glendale Garden Homes, and strongly urge the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed development on 1303–1315 N. Central Avenue. I walk our neighboring streets regularly, and I believe a six-story 149-unit apartment building will not just increase density by providing more housing, it will also create traffic and parking issues in this unassuming and quiet neighborhood so representative of Glendale’s historic nature. I support denying of the waiver for the EIR as requested by the developer.
Thank you for your consideration.
Paula Sigman-Lowery
318 E Randolph Street
Glendale CA 91207
email: [email protected]
mobile: (818) 437-1093
—
"and in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make” —The Beatles
February 4, 2025
For Council Meeting of February 4, 2025, Agenda Item 9a, Hearing regarding EIR/Glendale Garden Homes
Dear Mayor Asatryan and Councilmembers Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, and Najarian,
This letter serves to voice my strong support for approval of a motion to require an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed demolition of the the 37-unit Glendale Garden Homes (GGH) apartment complex at 1303- 1315 N. Central. GGH, with its spacious units and expansive landscaping, including mature trees, is indeed historically significant in more than just its 50+ year age. This complex exemplifies a worldwide movement in multi- family living that was welcomed into this country in the mid-20th century and flourished in Southern California due to population expansion and our distinct indoor/outdoor climate. GGH was built by visionaries who understood that multi-family dwellings should not take a back seat to single family home living in terms of quality of life and appearance. Now, more than ever, this vision is critical as vertical box building proliferates in our community.
GGH is highly significant in the evolution of urban planning and its architecture is a also harmonious in style, scale and massing with the rest of the neighborhood. GGH is something we should all be proud of and protect. Furthermore, it would be a violation of the City of Glendale’s own design review and historic preservation ordinances and guidelines to proceed with demolition without an EIR executed independent of the developer’s wishes, opinions and pocketbook. The Design Review Board’s opinion and the positions of the City’s own qualified staff reflect this. It would also be a violation of state law to not conduct an EIR for this property given what we already know and what has already been documented.
Thank you so much for your careful consideration of this matter and please do the right thing!
Sincerely,
Arlene Vidor
Glendale Resident
The Montecito Park Neighborhood Association
Via Email
February 3rd, 2025
Members of the Glendale City Council and Community Development Staff City of Glendale
613 East Broadway, Room 200
Glendale, CA 91206
RE: EIR Appeal Case No. PAPP-004151-2024, 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue
Dear Mayor Asatryan, City Council Members, and Community Development Staff:
The Montecito Park Neigborhood Association (MPNA) typically does not comment on matters not directly related to Montecito Park; however, MPNA finds the above-referenced proposed development, including the requested exemption from the standard EIR requirement, to be extremely troubling.
Exempting this project from the EIR requirement would set a dangerous precedent, bypassing established procedures whose sole purpose is to prevent irresponsible development and provide the public with an opportunity to evaluate and comment on changes which could seriously change the very nature of the neighborhoods in which we live.
We are writing in support of the Community Development Director’s decision to require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project proposed to replace the Glendale Garden Homes at 1303 -1315 North Central Avenue.
Any action by the City Council to waive the EIR requirement in the above-referenced matter would create the appearance of impropriety at the most fundamental level and seriously undermine public confidence in local government.
We urge Council to respect the City’s design process and deny the appeal to dispense with an EIR. Glendale residents and future generations deserve the transparency and appropriate scrutiny that an EIR provides.
Based on the significant impacts of this proposed development, the MPNA strongly supports the position taken by both the Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council and the Glendale Director of Community Development that an EIR should be required in this matter; therefore, MPNA urges you to deny EIR Appeal Case No. PAPP- 004151-2014.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Butler Anderson
President, Montecito Park Neighborhood Association
CC:
Suzi Abajian, City Clerk
Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
From: Kim Cooper
To: Asatryan, Elen; Brotman, Daniel; Gharpetian, Vartan; Kassakhian, Ardashes; Najarian, Ara; DL City Clerk Cc: Richard Schave
Subject: re: Item 9a. Glendale Garden Homes at 1303-1315 North Central Avenue Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 10:31:36 PM
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Dear esteemed Glendale councilmembers,
We write to express our strong support for the preservation of the beautiful and useful Glendale Garden Homes, 37 family sized rental units surrounded by old growth trees and landscaping at 1303-1315 North Central Avenue.
Please vote to sustain the Community Development Director’s decision to require an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed demolition of a historic resource.
Especially now that so many thousands of dwellings have been destroyed in the Eaton and Palisades fires, existing multi-family housing of such high architectural quality is precious and should be protected—and not held largely vacant as these units are, or demolished.
Sincerely yours,
Kim Cooper & Richard Schave
Esotouric, Looking Out For Los Angeles
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?
url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.esotouric.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CKCortes%40GlendaleCA.gov%7C84095889de324430b00708dd44e551cf%7Ce5115311f6c3421bbc03a5d8c79bf546%7C0%7C0%7C638742474957524704%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=I5dosDo3f7ixY4BviR2CFK%2FuVsqE1FbgDoDA4coeexc%3D&reserved=0 https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fesotouric.substack.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CKCortes%40GlendaleCA.gov%7C84095889de324430b00708dd44e551cf%7Ce5115311f6c3421bbc03a5d8c79bf546%7C0%7C0%7C638742474957540508%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vLho4C2bR%2Ba9MKssFNZckjKVC%2B38nPcIgyLuh1EXfvo%3D&reserved=0 From: Jason JONES
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 5:07:31 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Jason JONES
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90019
From: Liliana Nagy
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 7:23:12 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Liliana Nagy
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90046-6653
From: Jennalee Wolter
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 6:39:51 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Jennalee Wolter
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90024
From: Noemi Nagy
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 8:03:27 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Noemi Nagy
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90046
From: Jillian Wolter
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 8:38:38 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Jillian Wolter
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90024
From: Kinderlyn Galindo
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 10:04:57 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Kinderlyn Galindo
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90041
From: Alex Lai
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 10:35:09 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Alex Lai
[email protected]
Temple City, California 91780-3053
From: Zandra Gomez
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:10:08 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Zandra Gomez
[email protected]
El Monte, California 91732
From: Ramon Moreno
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:19:40 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Ramon Moreno
[email protected]
Glendale, California 91201
From: Maricela Velasco
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:59:22 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Maricela Velasco
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90029
From: Daniela Osorio
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:00:01 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Daniela Osorio
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90029
From: David Alvarado
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 3:19:27 PM
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
David Alvarado
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90004
From: Moises Zavala
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 3:25:51 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Moises Zavala
[email protected]
La Crescenta - Montrose, California 91021
From: Msrcos Gomez
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 6:24:20 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Msrcos Gomez
[email protected]
Glendale, California 91201
From: Antonio Moreno
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 6:15:32 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Antonio Moreno
[email protected]
Glendale, California 91202
From: Maria Cruz
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 6:14:57 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Maria Cruz
[email protected]
Glendale, California 91201
From: Aricia M
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 6:14:22 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Aricia M
[email protected]
Glendale, California 91202
From: Kimberly Cruz
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 6:32:37 PM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Kimberly Cruz
[email protected]
Glendale, California 91202
From: Matt Siegel
To: DL City Clerk
Subject: Support new homes at 1303-1315 N. Central Ave. in Glendale! Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 11:07:01 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.
Glendale City Council,
I am pleased to express strong support for the proposed development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue in Glendale. This project represents a significant step forward in addressing the ongoing regional housing shortage that is fueling our shared affordability and displacement crisis. Below are key highlights that demonstrate the project’s positive impact:
1. Maximizing Housing Potential
This project will add 149 new homes to a high-density residential area, significantly exceeding the base zoning allowance of 87 units. Among these, 19 homes are designated as below- market-rate housing, including 14 for very low-income families and 5 for moderate-income households. The innovative design prioritizes families, with 83% of the units consisting of two- and three-bedroom layouts. This project addresses the critical shortage of family-sized housing in the area and offers long-term stability for residents.
2. Community-Centered Design
Thoughtfully designed to complement the neighborhood, the project incorporates Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, a large landscaped courtyard, and inviting features like street- level porches and a Spanish-style fountain. Enhanced setbacks allow for mature tree plantings and open spaces, blending seamlessly with the adjacent streetscape while maintaining harmony with the surrounding environment. The project’s stepped height design aligns gracefully with nearby buildings, respecting the neighborhood’s character.
3. Sustainability and Accessibility
The development prioritizes green transportation with secure bicycle storage for each unit and EV-ready parking spaces. Fully electric apartments are equipped with solar panels, energy- efficient heat pump water heaters, and soundproofing measures. These features demonstrate the project’s strong commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, reducing its environmental impact while providing state-of-the-art living spaces.
4. Supporting Local Businesses
Located near key establishments like Ralphs Fresh Fare, the project is well-positioned to enhance the local economy by attracting new residents who will support small businesses in the area. The inclusion of amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and play area further enhances livability while fostering connections within the neighborhood.
For these reasons, we strongly urge the Glendale City Council to approve this project. The development at 1303-1315 N. Central Avenue exemplifies smart growth principles and offers tangible benefits for both current and future residents of Glendale, addressing our shared housing crisis in a thoughtful and sustainable manner.
Matt Siegel
[email protected]
Los Angeles, California 90042
February 11, 2025
By email
Re: Desecration at Glendale Garden Homes
Dear Mayor Asatryan and Members of the City Council, Bradley Calvert, Erik Krause, and Michael Garcia,
There are no words suitable for inclusion in the public record to adequately express my outrage and that of the Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association at developer/owner Greg Brody’s blatant attempt to defeat the EIR process the City Council voted to order last week by cutting down several trees at Glendale Garden Homes yesterday morning.
How much damage did he do? How will he be penalized? And how can the property landscaping be restored? Can the EIR be postponed until the landscaping has been restored? The CHNA insists that these questions be answered or that the project be rejected outright considering the neglect of so many apartments and the butchering of so many trees.
In my letter of February 4, 2025, I urged you to consider how Brody has managed this property, how that bears on the sincerity of his stated desires to provide housing in Glendale, and what type of landlord he will be if he is allowed to build his proposed project. Apparently realizing his neglect of the property was not enough, he’s obviously attempting to defeat the property’s claim to historic status by desecrating the landscaping that forms an integral part of the Glendale Gardens.
Instead of accepting the City Council’s decision, by his action in cutting down the trees Brody has shown his utter contempt for the council and the legal process. I hope you are as outraged as we are and take action accordingly.
Sincerely,
Mary-Lynne Fisher, President
Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association
cc: City Clerk, Cassandra Pruitt
*Please make this letter part of the Administrative Record