Agenda packet, first session — Glendale City Council, December 16, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

 
Project Name & Number (or Project Description): Automated Speed Safety Cameras Contractor Legal Name: American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility Phone: 480-443-7000 Email: [email protected] Address 1150 N. Alma School Road City Mesa State AZ Zip 85201 Federal Taxpayer ID Number: 48-1114931 City of Oakland Business License Number: 00266994 Schedule D – (Ownership, Ethnicity, and Gender) Please be advised that ethnicity and gender information will be used for reporting and tracking purposes ONLY.

Part I - Ownership & Ethnicity of Prime: (Please check one and explain below) Self-Employed, Name of Owner Corporation, State of Incorporation Kansas Partnership, General or Limited Names of Partners
Joint Venture, Names of Participants
Ownership Interests All owners must be listed in this information Part II - Ethnicity and Gender of Employees:

Male Female
Employment Category
Total
Employees
Oakland
Residents
African
American
Native
American /
Native Alaskan
Asian / Pacific
Islander
Caucasian
Hispanic
Other
African
American
Native
American /
Native Alaskan
Asian / Pacific
Islander
Caucasian
Hispanic
Other
Project Management 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Technical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clerical 8 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 Trades 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ethnicity
African American
American Indian/ Alaskan Native
Asian /Pacific Islander
Caucasian Filipino Hispanic Other
Number of Owners % Of Total Ownership Women Joint Venture Ownership Undefined Category 64 0 4 0 8 19 7 5 2 1 1 8 3 5
145 of 379
Rev. 06/23 Page 2 of 3
Schedule M – (Independent Contractor Questionnaire) – PART A: TO BE COMPLETED BY PROPOSED CONTRACTOR Please answer questions “yes” or “no” whenever possible. When a more extensive explanation is required and there is no space on this form, please attach a separate sheet. The word “contract” refers to the agreement the City is contemplating entering into with you. If you are a corporation, in addition to completing this form, attach a California Secretary of State business registration record (from the website) showing “active” status and return with this questionnaire. Non-profits must also attach a California Attorney General charitable trust registration record.

Yes No

1. Have you performed services for the City prior to today? If yes, please indicate the time period and the nature of the services. ✔

2. Have you received any training, guidance, or direction from the City regarding the particular method or manner by which the work will be performed? If yes, please describe what you are expecting (or have received) in the way of training or direction. ✔

3. Will your services under the contract be performed on City property? If no, please describe where the services are to be performed. ✔ 4. Do you expect to devote any full days (6 or more hours) or full weeks (30 or more hours) towards performing the services under the contract? If yes, please indicate approximately how many full days and/or full weeks you expect to devote during the life of the contract. For field service termination and configuration, we estimate completing approximately two sites per day. O ✔

5. Are there any set or fixed hours or days of the week during which the City is expecting you to perform services under the contract? If yes, please indicate the days and hours during which you will be performing services. ✔

6. In order to perform services under the contract, do you intend to provide your own supplies or equipment? If yes, briefly describe the equipment/supplies. Photo enforcement systems ✔

7. If your response to No. 7 is yes, has the City promised to or will you be expecting the City to reimburse you in any way for the cost of the supplies or equipment? ✔

8. Other than the above-referenced supplies and equipment, do you anticipate incurring any un-reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses in the performance of the contract with the City? If yes, please describe. ✔

9. Do you have federal and state employer identification numbers? If so, please provide these numbers FEIN: 48-1114931 CA EDD: 107-0290-0 ✔

10. Within the past two years have you regularly performed the same type of services (as called for in the contract) for any client(s) or customer(s) other than the City? If yes, please identify the client(s) or customer(s) and briefly describe the services performed. Please see Proposal Response Section C. Company Profile ✔

11. Do you currently have any client(s) or customer(s)s other than the City for whom you are performing or will perform services during the duration of the contract? If yes, please identify client(s) or customer(s) by name and briefly describe the nature of services performed. Please see Proposal Response Section C. Company Profile ✔

12. If you are self-employed, in the past two years have you notified any insurance company in conjunction with obtaining a business-related insurance policy that you are self-employed? If yes, please indicate the insurance company and the nature of the business-related policy. Not applicable

13. If you are self-employed, do you have your own employees to help you perform the services called for by your contract? (Do not refer to independent contractors you may use to assist you.) Not applicable 146 of 379 Rev. 06/23 Page 3 of 3
FOR CITY USE ONLY Based upon a review of this questionnaire and any other factors I have cited below; I have determined that this person (is) (is not) an independent contractor.

Date City Attorney/Assistant City Attorney/Deputy City Attorney PLEASE NOTE: For an electronic copy of this combined form and copies of other required standalone contract schedules, please go to: https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/contracts-and-compliance-forms-and-schedules:
 Proposed contractors must submit standalone contract Schedules I, N, N-1, O, S, W for compliance with City of Oakland policies, as applicable;  Proposed contractors must submit Schedule E and/or R indicating the use of subcontractors;  Proposed contractors must submit Schedule Z if the contract involves federal funds; and  Proposed contractors must submit insurance documents in compliance with Schedule Q.

Yes No

14. If you are self-employed, within the past two years have you been an employee of any employer (received a W-2)? If yes, state the employer(s), the date(s) of employment, and the nature of the services performed. Not applicable

15. Do you maintain a business location or office, which may include your residence? Does not include a residence (not self-employed) ✔ 16. With regard to the following, please indicate whether you have:
a. an existing business letterhead? ✔ b. an existing business phone number other than your home number? ✔ c. filed for a fictitious business name? If yes, please attach a certified copy of the County issued certificate and an affidavit of publication. ✔
d. done public advertising for your business? ✔

17. If you have answered parts or all of No. 16 with “Yes,” are the services represented in your answers the same type of services you will be performing for the City? ✔

18. Do you have a license from any governmental agency to perform the services under the contract? If yes, please state the type of license and the name of the licensing agency. Please see Proposal Response Section E: Organization Chart and Staff Qualifications ✔

19. If you are self-employed, please describe the extent of any personal financial investment you have made in order to be self-employed. You may either choose to indicate the actual dollar amount of investment or, without disclosing any dollar amount, briefly describe any purchases, leases, or other types of financial commitments made by you for self-employment purposes. ✔ By signing and submitting this combined form, the authorized representative hereby obligates the proposer/contractor(s) to the stated conditions referenced in this document. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Print Name: Jon Baldwin Title: Executive Vice President, Government Solutions Signature: Date: 7/28/2025
Oct 1 Farrah Hussein
(Oc
t
1 , 2025 10
:12
:35 PD
T
)
, 2025
147 of 379
148 of 379
July 8, 2025
Jared Bagnall
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. DBA Verra Mobility
1150 N Alma School Road
Mesa, AZ 85291
Dear Jared Bagnall,
Congratulations! Based on a review of the Declaration of Nondiscrimination (Schedule N-1) and supporting documentation, it has been determined that your firm is in full compliance with the Equal Benefits Ordinance (EBO), Chapter 2.32 of the Oakland Municipal Code. Your business is EBO certified with the City of Oakland.

While the letter does not bear an expiration date, please be advised that updated documentation is required for all substantive changes to the current compliance status. Substantive changes may include but are not limited to an open enrollment period after the date of this correspondence that includes benefits different from those reviewed for compliance; changes to the current collective bargaining agreement that affect the conditions of compliance with the Equal Benefits Ordinance; and/or changes to personnel policies affecting compliance with the Equal Benefits Ordinance. Please notify this office should any of these changes occur. Please note that the City of Oakland no longer issues EBO Compliance Certificates or EBO Memos, and this is the letter that should be used as proof of your EBO certification.

Should you have questions regarding this correspondence, please contact the City of Oakland Business Certification Team at [email protected]. Remember, attaching a copy of this letter satisfies the compliance review process.

Again, congratulations on this accomplishment, and best wishes in all your efforts to do business with the City of Oakland.

Respectfully,
Philip Lang
Assistant Contract Compliance Officer, Department of Workplace and Employment Standards (DWES)
149 of 379
Schedule N-1: Equal Benefits – Declaration of Nondiscrimination/Equal Access (Completed by the Prime Contractor/Consultant ONLY)
Chapter 2.32 - EQUAL BENEFITS ORDINANCE | Code of Ordinances | Oakland, CA | Municode Library The Equal Benefits Ordinance applies to entities that enter into a contract with the City for goods or services, public works or improvements, grants, and certain property contracts in the amount of $25,000 or more.

Section A. Vendor/Contractor/Consultant/Grantee Information Name of Company American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility Contact Name Jared Bagnall Contact Title Manager, Human Resources Address 1150 N Alma School Road
Mesa Arizona 85201
City State Zip
Phone Number 1.480.443.7000 Email Address [email protected] Vendor Number Federal ID or Social Security Number 26-3302690 Approximate Number of Employees in the U.S. 1053
Are any of your employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement or union trust fund? Yes No Union Name(s)
Section B. Compliance
Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? (Please check one)
✔
Yes No
Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with domestic partners1? (Please check one)
✔
Yes No
Section C. Compliance Please check each benefit that applies Benefits
Offered to
Employees
only
Offered to
Employees and
their spouses
Offered to
Employees and their
Domestic Partners
Not
Offered
at all
Employee
Handbook
attached
Health ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Dental ✔ ✔ ✔
Vision ✔ ✔ ✔
Retirement (Pension, 401K, etc) ✔
Bereavement ✔
Family Leave ✔
Parental Leave ✔
Employee Assistance Program ✔ ✔
Relocation & Travel ✔
Company Discount, Facilities & Events ✔
Credit Union
Child Care
Other ✔ ✔ ✔
150 of 379
Signature: Date: 24 June 2025
1 Domestic Partner is defined as a same-sex couple, or opposite-sex couple registered as such with a state or local government domestic partnership registry 151 of 379
To be completed by prime consultants only.

SCHEDULE E

PROJECT CONSULTANT TEAM LISTING
The consultant herewith must list all sub-consultants regardless of the tier and their respective percentages of the project work. No other sub-consultants. other than those listed below shall be used without prior written approval by the City of Oakland.

Provide all information listed and check the appropriate boxes. Firms must be certified with the City of Oakland in order to receive Local/Small Local Business Enterprise credits. At the time of submittal of Schedule E (for professional services), some USLBE-participation must be proposed in order to satisfy the requirement at the time of submission. If zero participation is presented, the proposal will not be accepted.

Date:02.20.25
Prime Consultant: American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility
Project Name:

Automated Speed Safety Cameras
Signed:

Type of Work Company Name Address and City Phone Number %of Project Work
Dollar Amount
LBE
VSLBE

SBE-LBE

LPG-LBE
Ethnicity
Gender
Electrical & construction Engineering Services
Urban Design Consulting Engineers
1 Bluxome Street Suite 403, San Francisco, CA 94107
(510) 868-1085
5% $234,000 x Asian, non- Hispanic Male
Print & Mail Services CSG Systems,
Inc.
15404 Long Vista Drive, Austin, Texas 78728
(402) 431-7490
11% $535,864 NL NL NL NL NL NL
Mail-in Lockbox Payment Processing
Retail Lockbox 105 14th Avenue, Suite 300,
Seattle, WA 98122
(206) 462-3135
1% $49,123 NL NL NL NL African
American/NonBlack
Male
Electronic Payment Processing
Paymentus 11605 North Community House
Rd, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28277
(540) 250-6380
9% $417,084 NL NL NL NL NL NL
Attach add1t1onal page(s) 1f necessary.

Contractors are required to identify the ethnicity and gender of all listed firms majority owner. This information will be used for tracking purposes only. • (M=African American) (Al=Asian Indian) (AP=Asian Pacific) (C=Caucasian) (H=Hispanic) (NA=Native American) (O=Other) (NL=Not Listed)•• (M = Male) (F = Female) Revised l/21J2D22 OM Marinship Development Interest, LLC
1485 Bayshore Blvd, Suite 201, San Francisco, CA 94124-3002 (415) 716-3965 African
American/NonMale Construction, 21% $1,031,400 Electrical & Services
x x x x
Project Management, Construction, & Services
American TrafficSolutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility
1150 N. Alma School Road, Mesa, AZ 85201
480-443-7000 53% $2,592,529 NL NL NL NL NL NL
152 of 379
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Department of Health and Human Services Office of RefugeeResettlement(HHS/ORR) Prohibition.

This Schedule must be submitted with all proposals or bids by all contractors/Consultants and their sub-contractors/subconsultants, and all vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland.

Compliance must be established prior to full contract execution.

I, (name) , the undersigned, of
(Position/Title
(Business Entity) - hereinafter referred to as Business Entity and duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity), declare the following:

1. Neither this Business Entity nor any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents are under contract with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR) to provide services or goods for data collection or immigration detention facilities. The term “data collection” includes the collection of information (such as personal information about consumers) for another purpose from that which it is ultimately used, datamining in large data bases for trends and information, threat-modeling to identify probable attackers to computer systems, predictive risk analysis to predict future events, and similar services. Additionally, this business entity does not anticipate a contract with ICE,CBP, or HHS/ORR for such work for the duration of a contract/contracts with the City of Oakland.

2. The appropriate individuals of authority are cognizant of their responsibility to notify the City’s Project Manager and invoice reviewer or the City Administrator’s Office, Chief Privacy Officer if any of this Business Entity’s subsidiaries, affiliates, or agents are under contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR for the purposes listed above.

3. To maintain compliance, upon review and approval of invoices, the contractors/vendors hereby agree to submit a declaration on company stationery attached to each invoice that the company remains in compliance with the ICE, CBP, and HHS/ORR Prohibition and will not seek or secure a contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR.

4. Upon close out or completion of deliverables and prior to issuance of final payment (while honoring the Prompt Payment Ordinance), this business entity agrees to submit a statement attached to the final invoice, under penalty of perjury, declaring full compliance with the ICE, CBP, and HHS/ORR Prohibition. I understand that an invoice is not declared fully complete and accepted unless and until the declaration of compliance is accepted.

5. If this business entity fails to disclose a contract with ICE, CBP, or HSS/ORR to provide services for data collection or immigration detention facilities, the relevant persons may be guilty of a misdemeanor and up to a $1,000 fine. Additionally, the City Administrator may to the extent permissible by law, remedy any such violations and may use all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void contracts in violation.

6. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above will not, have not, and do not plan to contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR to provide services or goods for data collection or immigration detention facilities.

Schedule I
“Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance”
Jonathan Baldwin Executive Vice President, Government Solutions American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility
153 of 379

PLEASE COMPLETE AND SIGN
�� I declare that I understand Ordinance #13540 C.MS. Based on my understanding the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. or
�� I declare that I understand Ordinance # 13540 C.MS. Based on my understanding all or a portion of the above is not true and correct to the best of my knowledge. (Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)
(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code ) (Name of Parent Company) (If applicable)
Contacts:

Office Phone: Cell Phone:
email:

For Office Use Only:

Approved/Denied/Waived
(signed)
Authorized Representative Date
SCHEDULE I DB/DM 2019
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility 1150 North Alma School Road, Mesa, Arizona 85201 Verra Mobility
(480) 443 - 7000 NA
[email protected]
Jonathan Baldwin,
Executive Vice President,
Government Solutions 2/20/2025
154 of 379
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Department of Health and Human Services Office of RefugeeResettlement(HHS/ORR) Prohibition.

This Schedule must be submitted with all proposals or bids by all contractors/Consultants and their sub-contractors/subconsultants, and all vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland.

Compliance must be established prior to full contract execution.

I, (name) , the undersigned, of
(Position/Title
(Business Entity) - hereinafter referred to as Business Entity and duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity), declare the following:

Schedule I
“Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance”
Marinship Development Interest LLC
Derek Smith Managing Member
155 of 379

Office Phone: Cell Phone:
email:

For Office Use Only:

Approved/Denied/Waived
(signed)
Authorized Representative Date
SCHEDULE I DB/DM 2019
Marinship Development Interest LLC 2100 Embarcadero, Ste 205, Oakland, CA 94606 Derek Smith 02/11/2025
N/A
(415) 282-5160 (415) 716-3965
[email protected]
156 of 379
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Department of Health and Human Services Office of RefugeeResettlement(HHS/ORR) Prohibition.

This Schedule must be submitted with all proposals or bids by all contractors/Consultants and their sub-contractors/subconsultants, and all vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland.

Compliance must be established prior to full contract execution.

I, (name) , the undersigned, of
(Position/Title
(Business Entity) - hereinafter referred to as Business Entity and duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity), declare the following:

Schedule I
“Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance”
Jason J. Ling Principal
Urban Design Consulting Engineers
Docusign Envelope ID: 998FB8EB-A214-4601-A227-E10071D6D8DC 157 of 379

Office Phone: 510-868-1085
email: [email protected]
For Office Use Only:

Approved/Denied/Waived
(signed)
Authorized Representative Date
SCHEDULE I DB/DM 2019
Jason J. Ling
Urban Design Consulting Engineers 428 Alice Street, Suite 132, Oakland, CA 94607 N/A
(510) 693-3686
Docusign Envelope ID: 998FB8EB-A214-4601-A227-E10071D6D8DC 2/5/2025
X
158 of 379
159 of 379
160 of 379
161 of 379
162 of 379
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Department of Health and Human Services Office of RefugeeResettlement(HHS/ORR) Prohibition.

This Schedule must be submitted with all proposals or bids by all contractors/Consultants and their sub-contractors/subconsultants, and all vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland.

Compliance must be established prior to full contract execution.

I, (name) , the undersigned, of
(Position/Title
(Business Entity) - hereinafter referred to as Business Entity and duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity), declare the following:

Schedule I
“Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance”
Jerry Portocalis Chief Commercial Officer
Paymentus Corporation
163 of 379

Office Phone: Cell Phone:
email:

For Office Use Only:

Approved/Denied/Waived
(signed)
Authorized Representative Date
SCHEDULE I DB/DM 2019
X
Jerry Portocalis 2/20/2025
Paymentus Corporation 11605 N. Community House Rd, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28277 Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
980-272-3788 214-244-5360
[email protected]
164 of 379
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility 480 443 7000 1150 North Alma School Road Mesa AZ 85201

NOT APPLICABLE NA

NA NA NA NA
NA NA
Jonathan Baldwin Executive Vice President, Government Solutions 2 20 2025
Craig Raphael 238-7229 1007571
Transportation Automated Speed Safety Cameras
2 24 25 Craig Raphael
165 of 379
x
Marinship Development Interest LLC 415 716 3965
2100 Embarcadero, Ste 205 Oakland CA 94606
x
415 716 3965 Derek Smith
3637 Rhoda Ave Oakland CA 94602
Derek Smith Managing Member
02 11 25
Craig Raphael
Transportation
238-7229 1007571
Automated Speed Safety Cameras
2 24 25 Craig Raphael
166 of 379
x
Urban Design Consulting Engineers 510 868 1085
428 Alice Street, Suite 132 Oakland CA 94605
X
Urban Design Consulting Engineers 510 868 1085
428 Alice Street, Suite 132 Oakland CA 94605
Jason J. Ling Principal
02 04 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: DAE3D4D8-6070-4CFF-90F3-71B03064ADA6 238-7229 1007571
Automated Speed Safety Cameras
Craig Raphael
Transportation
2 24 25 Craig Raphael
167 of 379
Cl� SCIEDULEO
OAKLAND CONTRACTOR ACKHOWLS>GalENT OF aTY Of OAKl.AHll CAMPAIGN CONTRll!UllON LIIIITS �01M.....-llyc,ty�,...1o-1oea........

Rep,eseutlOi • - P,qoctSpocNo. 1007571__
.... c---, ......
1 •••Sts SO..)!., Uf1gWlal_n.� tU1111, \'""'� one). lf'-",yina1. con,�ea■ u,-.�es. rr .-....:-� • ......,.,�\.e ..__,tractor name ia.llU any �ngedclato, ic---. CSG S:z'.Slems, Inc. -• ..lQ.3 200 2000
�--169 Inverness Dr W, Suite 300 Citf Englewood sia co Zip .llllll.1 lryp,ots...- (--)_Bio_,,,_,. x_Quolilc:mc,, __ I
� Ow,-(1 ""1'� A majority_,., is•-o,enti!y...,CMns mon, than �oft,e cm>-ading firm o, entity. hCMd,,a or Business Mame N/A ----------
1s--. ..... - n,
If ho ..,..,.izllMd Cclnroc:lon � oclonowloclgeo by l>ia 0< her .;gn.tura tho folowing:

The Oalo1and Campaign Relocm Act limits campaign contribu1ions and prohibits comribu1ions from contnlcloB doing business ..it, the City of Oa.Jdand and the Oakland Redevek>pment Agency during specified time periods. Vdators are subject lo civil and criminal penalies.

I - ... ad Oal<land Muricipal Code Chap ... 3.12- including seclion 3. 12.140. the oontracl0r provisions of 1toe Oaland Campaign Reform Act and cet1if)' that I/we Raw- not knowingly. norwill I lwe make contributions cfurin'1 the period specified in the Act.

I ....-.dff'stand that the contribution rM"lrictions also a;ppty to entitiHlper'50nS affiliated 'Mth the contractor as indicated in � Oakland M.onicipal Code Cbapte, 3. 12-080.
•-•""""l'°"""""'°"""°"""i""""hsfom...,.ille°"'lril<lti......-...ilime,erio<l,IMlfilt..,,,_bm.,.t,lltCilyof 7,k.u,d2 t<4,� __)__)�2/0712025
0'1lt
Michael Woods EVP & President Communications, Media & Tech �Nameol.=- PosiOao
IToHC......,..llyCiyofo.l<--com,1-ofhfam
Pait -llyOly: __J__J_ By
n,ie-cnC-�· __J__J II,
Craig Raphael
Transportation Automated Speed Safety Cameras
238-7229
2 24 25 Craig Raphael
168 of 379
c,tf!: SCIEDULEO
OAKLAND CONTRACTOR AC�NT OF aTY OF OAKI.AHll CAMPAIGN CONTRll!UllO� LIIIITS [To1M..,.,.-11yc.ty�,...1x>-1x>Ca<rocb
�R,,,_.., __ - P,qoctSpocNo. __ .,__ c-.,._,,_
11111sts an_ ungWl.:._ ,,�� ..... ,,. , .... -=-oneJ.. •--"l;llina. con,�ea■ .. , ..... appues. ,r ,,=•�. "'"'""''¥""''-e """"''tractor name_.._. any �nged data. �- Walt Townes -· 20?70?6556
15 .... -. 105 14th Ave Ste 300 City Seattle _w&.�
ir,,..o1s.....-(--illlew ____,,,.,,..,. _QualilOltioll _-...,1 � OwrW< (I..,� Amajcrity _,.,is•-o,enti!y...,<MM men, than 50%oft,e cm>-ading firm o, entily . ......,.°'a..s;,,...Na,me Walt Townes """"° 20� 46�-3135 15 _ _, 105 14th Ave Ste 300 ,..,. Seattle _ wAn.98122
[TH Wldonq,«I Ccl<ltroclon �-ocllnowlodgeo by l>ia o,har.;gn.tura tho -...g:

The Oalc1and Campaign Rolorm Act limits campaign contrib<dions ard prohibits comribu1ions 1n,m conttaclol5 doing bugness wilh the City of Oakland and the Oakland RedeYek>pment Agency during specified time periods. Vtola'Df'S are subject lo civil and criminal penalies.

I Ntv• n,ad Oal<land Murocipal C:00.. Chapll!r 3. 12. including .-ion 3. 12. 140. t1w! contrad>Ot' p,ov.sions of� Oakland Campaign Reform Act and certify that I/we haw not knowingly. nor will I fwe make oontributions during the period specified in the Act.

I md«stand that ttw contribution rM"tric1ions also a,ppy to entitiH/person.s affiliated with the oontracror as indicated in ct.. Oakland Municipal Code Cbapte, 3.12.080.
•-.,. ..,-.,..1o111e notmi1lionon1ti5-uinghconHMD......-...ilime llffll'l, I Mlfilton ..,.,__,,..,.,.Cilyof h!att 1ql1'.'1� [
WaftTownH(�bl3 20lSU:36!::!!l
Walt Townes
�Nameol.=-
[Tolle�llyCiy oto.l<--com,1-oflllePait -llyCily: _J_J_ n.oe-cnc-�-_J___J II,
_3/E-2025
Co-Founder
Posibcn
By
Craig Raphael 238-7229 1007571
Transportation Automated Speed Safety Cameras
2 24 25 Craig Raphael
169 of 379
Paymentus Corporation
11605 Community House Rd, Suite 300 Charlotte NC 28277
X
Paymentus Corporation is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Paymentus Group, which is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(same)
(same)
980 272 3788
Jerry Portocalis Chief Commercial Officer
2 20 2025
Craig Raphael
Transportation
238-7229 1007571
Automated Speed Safety Cameras
2 24 25 Craig Raphael
170 of 379

SCHEDULE W

BORDER WALL PROHIBITION
(This form is to be completed by Contractors and their sub-contractors, and all Vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland) I, , the undersigned, a
(Name)
of
(Title)
(Business Entity)
(hereinafter referred to as Business Entity am duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity)
I. Neither this Business Entity nor any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents are under contract with any branch of the federal government to plan, design, build, support, repair and/or maintain any part of the border wall nor do we anticipate entering or competing for such work for the duration of a contract or contracts with the City of Oakland.

II. The appropriate individuals of authority are cognizant of their responsibility to notify the city contact person/Project Manager, invoice reviewer or the Department of Workplace and
Employment Standards (DWES), if any of the identified above decide to compete, plan, design, build, support, repair and/or maintain any part of work or servicing the border wall.

III. To maintain compliance, upon review and approval of invoices, the contractors/vendors hereby agree to submit attached to each invoice, a declaration on company stationery that the company remains in compliance with the Border Wall Prohibition and will not seek or secure a contract related to all aspects of the Border Wall IV. Upon close out or completion of deliverables and prior to issuance of final payment (while honoring the Prompt Payment Ordinance) I agree to submit a statement attached to the final invoice, under penalty of perjury, declaring full compliance with the Border Wall Prohibition. I understand that an invoice is not declared fully complete and accepted unless and until the declaration of compliance is accepted.

V. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above will not, have not and do not plan to participate in the building, servicing, maintenance of the operations of the so called “Border Wall”. I declare that I understand Ordinance #13459 C.MS. Based on my understanding the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
I declare that I understand Ordinance #13459 C.MS. Based on my understanding all or a portion of the above is not true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Jonathan Baldwin
Executive Vice President, Government Solutions American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility 171 of 379
(Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)
(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address City, State and Zip Code) (Name of Parent Company)
Jonathan Baldwin
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. dba Verra Mobility 1150 North Alma School Road, Mesa, Arizona 85201 Verra Mobility
2/20/2025
172 of 379

SCHEDULE W

Derek Smith
Managing Member Marinship Development Interest LLC
173 of 379
(Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)
(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address City, State and Zip Code) (Name of Parent Company)
Marinship Development Interest LLC 2100 Embarcadero, Ste 205, Oakland, CA 94606 02/05/2025
N/A
174 of 379

SCHEDULE W

Jason J. Ling
Principal Urban Design Consulting Engineers
Docusign Envelope ID: 9AE24F90-5F3F-4922-8FAB-F8155EEB7B88 X
175 of 379
(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address City, State and Zip Code) (Name of Parent Company)
Jason J. Ling
(Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)
Urban Design Consulting Engineers 428 Alice Street, Suite 132, Oakland, CA 94607 N/A
Docusign Envelope ID: 9AE24F90-5F3F-4922-8FAB-F8155EEB7B88 2/4/2025
176 of 379
177 of 379
178 of 379
179 of 379
180 of 379

SCHEDULE W

Jerry Portocalis
Chief Commercial Officer Paymentus Corporation
X
181 of 379
(Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)
(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address City, State and Zip Code) (Name of Parent Company)
Jerry Portocalis 2/20/2025
Paymentus Corporation 11605 N. Community House Rd, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28277 Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
182 of 379
Automated Speed Safety Camera System Page 57 of 60 Template Rev.3.24.2025 EXHIBIT 5
CONTRACTOR’S STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
183 of 379
Automated Speed Safety Camera System Page 58 of 60 Template Rev.3.24.2025 Intellectual Property Warranty
Contractor represents, warrants, and agrees that: (a) Contractor has all of the Intellectual Property Rights necessary to provide the Product or Services to Client in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; (b) Contractor is the sole owner and/or has secured all necessary licenses, consents, and authorizations with respect to the use of the Product or Services to the full extent contemplated herein, including, but not limited to, all Source Code, text, pictures, audio, video, logos, and copy contained therein; (c) the Product or Services do not and shall not infringe upon any patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary right or violate any trade secret or other contractual right of any Third Party; and (d) as far as Contractor is aware and could discover with reasonable diligence, there is currently no actual or threatened suit against Contractor by any Third Party based on an alleged violation of such right. This warranty shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.” Definitions
(a) Intellectual Property: all patentable and unpatentable inventions, algorithms, application programming interfaces (APIs), concepts, data, databases and data collections, designs, diagrams, documentation, drawings, flow charts, formulae, ideas, knowhow, materials, marketing and development plans, trademarks and service marks (including brand names, product names, logos, and slogans), methods, models, procedures, processes, protocols, software code (in any form including source code and executable or object code), specifications, uniform resource identifiers including uniform resource locators (URLs), user interfaces, web sites, works of authorship or expression, and other forms of technology.
(b) Pre-Existing Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property developed prior to or outside the scope of this Agreement, and any derivatives of that Intellectual Property. (c) Software: All computer programs, media, procedures, rules, and associated Documentation pertaining to the control and operation of the data processing and data storage for the System as further set forth in any associated Scope of Work. Software includes all associated features and functions described in the Scope of Work and Requirements, including all Updates, derivative works, Enhancements, modifications or Upgrades, and all error corrections, patches and bug fixes provided by the Contractor and which is made part of the System as well as all related or ancillary data files, modules, libraries, tutorial and demonstration programs, and other components thereof, all source and object code, firmware and all Documentation. (d) City Work Product: All intellectual property, documentation, software configurations, reports, data schemas, scripts, workflows, visualizations, forms, and templates developed specifically under this Agreement for the City, excluding Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property and derivative works thereof.

General Ownership Provisions
(a) Ownership - City: Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the City retains sole ownership and Intellectual Property rights in all Pre-Existing Intellectual Property of the City. Contractor further acknowledges and agrees that the City retains sole ownership and Intellectual Property rights in and to all City Data. Contractor further acknowledges and agrees that the Contractor neither has nor makes any claim to any 184 of 379
Automated Speed Safety Camera System Page 59 of 60 Template Rev.3.24.2025 right, title or interest in any of the foregoing, except as specifically granted or authorized under this Agreement. City grants to Contractor and its affiliates and contractors a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, fully paid, non-sublicensable, and non-transferable license to use and reproduce City Data solely to provide and support City’s use of the System. City Data shall include all information, documents, images, photographs, violation records, calibration logs, reports, configurations, analytical results, metadata, traffic patterns, and any other outputs generated by the System from City Data in connection with use within city limits—regardless of form or format, and whether derived from or based on Contractor’s proprietary tools. (b) Ownership - Contractor: The City acknowledges and agrees that the Contractor and its licensors retain sole ownership and Intellectual Property rights in all Pre-Existing Intellectual Property of the Contractor. The City further acknowledges and agrees that Contractor and its licensors retain sole ownership of the Intellectual Property rights in and to the System, documentation, Contractor websites, software, and technology and methodologies created by or for, or licensed to, Contractor and any updates to, or derivative works of, the foregoing (“Contractor Core Technology”), notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary. Contractor Core Technology further includes previously existing Intellectual Property rights or rights to Intellectual Property developed by Contractor, alone or in collaboration with the City or a third party, during the Term of this Agreement whether specifically to satisfy the terms of this Agreement or not. The City further acknowledges and agrees that the City neither has nor makes any claim to any right, title or interest in any of the foregoing, except as specifically granted or authorized under this Agreement. Under no circumstances will any modifications, configurations, improvements, enhancements, upgrades, or further developments of the Contractor Core Technology be considered “work for hire.” (c) Ownership - Third Party Intellectual Property: All rights, licenses, and privileges for all third-party Software integrated, bundled, or provided as part of the System are acquired by Contractor from those third parties (“Third Party Licenses”). Contractor represents that it has the right to grant use of any third-party intellectual property integrated into the System. Contractor further grants a non-exclusive, non-transferrable and non-assignable license during the Term, to use and access the third-party Software incorporated in the System, for the sole purposes of providing the stated goods or Services to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. (d) Ownership – Jointly Developed Intellectual Property: The City acknowledges and agrees that the Contractor retains sole ownership and Intellectual Property rights in all Jointly-Developed Intellectual Property. “Jointly-Developed Intellectual Property” includes intellectual property, documentation, public service announcements and other materials, software configurations, reports, data schemas, scripts, workflows, visualizations, forms, and templates developed specifically under this Agreement for or with the City, excluding Contractor’s Pre-Existing Intellectual Property and derivative works thereof. Contactor grants the City a non-exclusive, non-transferable, nonsublicensable, perpetual, and royalty-free license to access, use, reproduce, and display the Jointly-Developed Intellectual Property.
(e) License to Any Required Software or Tools: Contractor grants City a non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, revocable, and royalty-free license 185 of 379
Automated Speed Safety Camera System Page 60 of 60 Template Rev.3.24.2025 to access, use, and operate the System during the Term, including any software, code, dashboard, portal, or data processing tools that are part of or required to use the System, solely for City’s stated purposes in this Agreement or SOW in accordance with the applicable Contractor published system requirements and technical functionality for the System as described in the Documentation. “Documentation” means the then-current product documentation for the supported version of the System.

Other Provisions:
(a) Transition Rights: City shall be entitled to, and Contractor shall assist with, a complete data export of City Data upon expiration or termination of this contract.
(b) No Use of City Data or Images for Machine Learning or Marketing:

Contractor will not use City Data, violation records, or vehicle imagery to develop algorithms, train AI models, or conduct commercial analytics without prior written City approval.
(c) City Approval Prior to Implementation of Any OSS or Third-Party License: Contractor shall inform City in writing before embedding any third-party or open-source license components that may impose onward obligations on the City. 186 of 379
To: Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
633 E. Broadway, Room 209, Glendale, CA 91206
[email protected]
CC: Arek Harmandayan
[email protected]
CC: Pastor Casanova
[email protected]
11-24-2025
Dear Mr. Hernandez,
Verra Mobility is committed to the Glendale Speed Safety Program (AB645). Verra Mobility will honor the pricing, the scope and the contract terms of the pre-existing City of Oakland Contract Work Order #21781 should Glendale proceed with a Cooperative Agreement per item 144.

Utilization by Other Agencies. As noted in the Oakland contract, item 17.000 Postage Costs and Methods will be honored as a pass-through costs and shown in item 17.000.

In addition, to help Glendale with billing, Verra Mobility will delay billing the pass-through postage until 90 days after the warning period starts so you will not have to request additional funds as the program starts-up.

If there are any additional questions, please don't hesitate to reach out via email, [email protected], or phone, 602-300-5997.

Sincerely,
Melba E. Rivera-Irizarry |
Global Vice President, Strategic Accounts
1150 N. Alma School Road | Mesa, AZ 85201
C 602 300 5997 [email protected] | www.verramobility.com 187 of 379
188 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 1

CITY OF GLENDALE
Per California Assembly Bill 645, the City of Glendale has been chosen to implement a Speed Safety Pilot Program until January 1, 2032.

The purpose of this program is to advance the City of Glendale’s transportation safety and equity. This technology has the potential to reduce speed-related collisions and injuries and the trajectory of speed safety hazards to reduce speed-related collisions and injuries. Photo enforcement through a speed safety system is a key component which aligns with Glendale’s Safe & Healthy Streets Plan to improve street safety.

The City of Glendale is committed to becoming a safer environment for residents in all transportation modes and across all abilities.

DESCRIPTION OF SAFETY SYSTEM
Technology and Traffic Safety
Existing law establishes a basic speed law that prohibits a person from driving a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable given the weather, visibility, traffic, and highway conditions. However, regardless of preexisting law, speed-related incidents have been a recurring issue. Vehicular speed is a concern.

Reducing potential speed-related collisions can improve overall safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and operators of motor vehicles and their passengers.

System Description
a) A “speed safety system” or “system” is a fixed or mobile radar or laser system or any other electronic device that utilizes automated equipment to detect a violation of speed laws and obtains a clear photograph of a speeding vehicle’s rear license plate.

The system only captures data of a speeding vehicle’s rear license plate and does not capture data of non-speeding vehicles.
b) A speed safety system is defined as a system that is capable of detecting speed violations for both directions of travel and may consist of more than one device.

The Department shall use the surveillance technology only for the following authorized purposes:

Authorized Use(s):

1. Enforce speed limits on City streets in accordance with California Vehicle Code section 22425-22431.

2. Analysis of and reporting on speed enforcement, as required under the Speed Safety System Pilot Program.

The surveillance technology will include automated speed enforcement cameras, which may be owned by either the vendor or the City. These cameras will be strategically placed in areas with high rates of speed-related collisions. The systems utilize cellular communication to transmit data to backend software, providing authorized users with access to uploaded photographs, radar readings, and license plate information.

189 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 2

CITY OF GLENDALE

PURPOSE OF THE SYSTEM
The City’s use of the Speed Safety System is being implemented to provide the following benefits to the community:
 Public Safety: The implementation of speed safety programs is proven to reduce the risk of severe injuries and fatalities due to speeding, enhancing overall public safety in the City. The speed safety program has demonstrated its effectiveness in minimizing speed-related collisions, thereby improving road safety for everyone.  Equitable Enforcement: Speed safety systems can promote equity by improving reliability and eliminating traffic enforcement biases. Safety systems enhance the predictability and effectiveness of speeding enforcement, allowing for broader implementation.
 City Resources: Speed violations can be detected remotely, increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of speed enforcement.
 Policy Development: The speed safety program five-year pilot period will inform the future of potential automated speed enforcement statewide policies. The data collected on vehicles exceeding posted speed limits can be used in prioritizing future City policies and traffic safety measures.

CIVIL RIGHTS AND SAFEGUARDS
The City of Glendale has identified and assessed potential impacts as well as mitigation strategies to protect the civil liberties and civil rights of the community as it pertains to the Speed Safety Program.

Discrimination
Automated speed safety systems, distributed throughout the City, aim to eliminate racial biases seen in traditional traffic stops, reducing the risk for drivers of color.

Economic Loss
The speed safety system is equipped to reduce misidentification or identify theft and will only provide citations to those that have exceeded the speed limit. The automated enforcement is intended to reduce staff time dedicated to speed enforcement, reducing overall costs.

Loss of Liberty
Improper exposure to arrests or detainment due to incomplete or inaccurate data, is highly unlikely because speed cameras are tested regularly for quality assurance before issuing violations.

Loss of Dignity
The surveillance system only captures rear license plates and prohibits images of vehicle occupants, with any pedestrian or cyclist images being destroyed by the vendor. 190 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 3

CITY OF GLENDALE
Loss of Autonomy
The City of Glendale will not share surveillance data with other departments or entities, in compliance with California Vehicle Code section 22425(l)(5).

Loss of Trust
License plate numbers are solely used for speed violations, with strict policies allowing only authorized access to system data and prohibiting facial recognition technology by California law.

Data collected is confidential, not shared with third parties, and may only be released to the registered owner or the individual identified as the driver at the time of an alleged violation.

Physical Harm
The speed safety system lacks access to distinguishable individual information for targeting.

The automated enforcement does not provide physical harm in any way.

FISCAL COST
The fiscal costs, such as the initial purchase of equipment, personnel, and other ongoing costs, include the following in Table 1.

Table 1 Estimated Annual Costs (Per Year for 9 Locations) Type Ongoing Costs
Salary & Fringe Benefits $320,000
Vendor Operational Costs
(Camera System, Citation
Processing, Citation Appeals
$605,000
Other City Costs
(procurement, signage,
training, power costs, etc.)
$75,000
Total Cost $1,000,000
The implementation of these systems are estimated to cost approximately $1 million per year for five years to cover nine locations. These costs include expenses for installation, maintenance, and operation of automated speed enforcement systems, as well as administrative costs related to processing violations and program oversight.

To fund this initiative, staff is requesting funding through the General Fund. However, under AB645, revenue generated from citations is expected to offset operational costs before being allocated to local traffic-calming measures. Additional funding sources, such as grants or state funding, may also be explored to reduce the program’s impact on the General Fund.

The program will require one to two full-time staff members for oversight, administration, and coordination with law enforcement strategies.
191 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 4

CITY OF GLENDALE

CAMERA LOCATION DEPLOYMENT
Screening Factors
The initial factors established by AB 645 for eligibility included:
- Cameras shall be located on a high-injury street, a school zone street, or a street with documented speed racing.
- Cameras cannot be located on state highways, freeways, or expressways. - Cameras should be in areas that are geographically and socioeconomically diverse.

Location Selection Methodology
The preliminary speed safety camera locations were recommended after conducting quantitative and qualitative analysis. This analysis included an examination of the City’s Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) study locations, speed-related crashes, speeding citations, street downgrades, and notable or unique intersection features. Appendix A contains the memorandum that describes the process for recommending locations. The initial assessment identified the 16 preliminary locations recommended for a speed safety system.

PROPOSED SPEED CAMERA LOCATIONS
Determining Recommended Speed Safety Camera Locations
The top 16 locations that were recommended through data analysis were presented to the community for evaluation. The City also conducted speed surveys from December 2024 – January 2025. Speed surveys identified the number of vehicles exceeding the speed limit by 11 MPH or more for each preliminary location. The community input and speed surveys were used to make recommendations for the nine initial pilot locations.

The total count of community votes for specific segments from the Glendale Speed Safety Survey, speed limit violations, and total collisions (2014 – 2024) are presented in Figure 1. 192 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 5

CITY OF GLENDALE
Figure 1 Glendale Speed Safety Survey, Speed Violations, and Total Collisions 193 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 6

CITY OF GLENDALE
These nine segments align closely with the highest instances of speeding, with one exception:

Glendale Ave: Lomita Ave to Broadway, which showed lower speeding rates compared to other areas while ranking higher in the community survey. Considering this, we recommend replacing this segment with Chevy Chase Dr: Lilac Ln to Sinclair Ave to better address locations with significant speeding instances. Table 1 presents the nine recommended locations for speed safety cameras. The locations of these locations and their proximity to schools is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1 Finalized Speed Safety Camera Locations
Top 9 Locations

1. Glendale Ave: Monterey Rd to Verdugo Rd

2. Brand Blvd: Magnolia Ave to Maple St

3. Glenoaks Blvd: Kenilworth Ave to Central Ave

4. San Fernando Rd: California Ave to Colorado St

5. Glenoaks Blvd: Rosedale Ave to Cleveland Rd

6. Glenoaks Blvd: Allen Ave to Ruberta Ave

7. Brand Blvd: Harvard St to Lexington

8. Central Ave: Broadway to Doran Ave

9. Chevy Chase Dr: Lilac Ln to Sinclair Ave
Speed safety cameras will be operational for no more than 18 months after installation, unless a significant reduction in speeding per the requirements of the assembly bill have been met. If the City of Glendale chooses to relocate the systems, the remaining seven camera locations will serve as potential relocation sites.

Additional recommended locations provided through community input, but were not considered, are outlined in Appendix B.
194 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 7

CITY OF GLENDALE
Figure 2 Speed Camera System Proximity to School Zones
195 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 8

CITY OF GLENDALE
Table 3 outlines the metrics for the nine recommended speed safety system locations.

Table 3 Recommended Location Metrics
ID Segment* Speed Safety
Locations
Posted
Speed Limit
Number of Daily
Vehicles > 10 MPH
Segment Length
(Miles) Citations Fatalities In the LRSP?
Total
Collisions
1 Glendale Ave: Monterey Rd to Verdugo Rd 700 block of
Glendale Ave 30 MPH 2760 .51 1505 0 N 16
2 Brand Blvd: Magnolia Ave to Maple St 800 block of
Brand Blvd 25 MPH 1106 .49 374 1 Y 15
3 Glenoaks Blvd: Kenilworth Ave to Central Ave 300 block of Glenoaks Blvd 40 MPH 582 .53 661 0 N 11
4 San Fernando Rd: California Ave to Colorado St
5300 block of
San Fernando
Rd
35 MPH 582 .55 95 1 Y 15
5 Glenoaks Blvd: Rosedale Ave to Cleveland Rd 1200 block of Glenoaks Blvd 40 MPH 552 .26 409 0 Y 19
6 Glenoaks Blvd: Allen Ave to Ruberta Ave 1800 block of Glenoaks Blvd 40 MPH 531 .51 171 0 Y 26
7 Brand Blvd: Harvard St to Lexington Dr 300 block of
Brand Blvd 25 MPH 450 .51 279 0 N 30
8 Central Ave: Broadway to Doran Ave 200 block of
Central Ave 35 MPH 396 .53 80 0 N 20
9 Chevy Chase Dr: Lilac Ln to Sinclair Ave
1700 block of
Chevy Chase Dr 30 MPH 353 .61 92 0 N 4
*The final speed safety system locations will be determined upon completion of final design and field conditions. 196 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 9

CITY OF GLENDALE

DEPLOYMENT DEMOGRAPHICS
Socioeconomic Characteristics of Selected Locations
Throughout the process of identifying potential speed safety camera locations, the demographics of the area were considered to assess impacts on predominantly low-income neighborhoods. As such, socioeconomic characteristics for segments where a camera system was proposed were compiled and comparable socioeconomic characteristics for Glendale were also compiled. Data was collected at both a citywide level and around recommended system locations, then averaged, as shown in Table 4. Data was sourced from the American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2022.

Table 4 Socioeconomic Characteristics
Characteristic City of Glendale
(Average)
System Locations
(Average)
Car-Free
Households 2.43% 3.24%
Minority Population 31.40% 32.11%
Households in
Poverty 30.70% 38.76%
Unemployed
Population 5.06% 8.91%
25+ Population with
Higher Education 43.76% 39.83%
City socioeconomic characteristics are proportionately represented in the census tracts surrounding segments where a camera system was proposed. 197 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 10

CITY OF GLENDALE
Geographic Characteristics of Selected Locations
Locations were chosen after a thorough analysis of speed related crashes, speeding citations, and geographical features of the roadway segments, such as downward gradients. The analysis revealed a relatively even spread of potential locations throughout the City as shown in Figure

3. Figure 3 Distribution of Camera Locations
s
The camera locations are not predominantly in low-income neighborhoods and are not clustered in only one geographic area of the city. The proposed cameras are in locations that are geographically and socioeconomically diverse as stated in the assembly bill. 198 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 11

CITY OF GLENDALE

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
The City of Glendale conducted targeted outreach to stakeholder organizations to ensure their perspectives informed the System Use Policy & System Impact Report. Project engagement took place from October 2024 – January 2025. Over 400 individual stakeholders including community organizations, homeowner associates, and business groups were contacted in preparation and delivery of the engagement for the Glendale Speed Safety Program. Additional outreach was conducted with other key City Departments and partners such as the Glendale Police Department, Glendale Fire Department, and various Glendale Unified School District campuses.

During the 4-month outreach period, the City of Glendale reached over 4,600 touchpoints by conducting the following outreach strategies
 Project website
 Online survey
 Community meetings (one virtual and one in-person)
 Public information campaign
Project Website: www.glendalespeedsafety.com
The project website consists of all project information including the project timeline, Frequently Asked Questions, fact sheet, meeting presentations, exhibits, infographics, and opportunities for public input. Information was provided in English, Spanish, Korean, and Armenian.

The project website was viewed 4,163 times during the outreach period.

Online Survey
A multilingual survey was developed using the Social Pinpoint platform which provides a geographical representation of where cameras are proposed so that survey respondents can prioritize their top areas of concern. The survey input was used to further confirm and narrow down the 16 recommended locations to nine priority locations. The survey was made available on the City’s website starting November 2024.

The online survey was completed by 346 residents, students, and frequent visitors of the City of Glendale. In total there were 217 Glendale residents and 129 residents of Los Angeles County based on the zip codes inputted. The Speed Safety Survey consisted of 12 questions that helped determine speed safety cameras, program benefits, and program concerns.

The information in the following figures is a summary of the online survey results, including:
level of support, driving concerns, and age groups. Survey questions and results are located in Appendix C.

199 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 12

CITY OF GLENDALE
Figure 1 Level of Support from Survey Participants
Figure 2 Driving Concerns in the City of Glendale Ranked on a Scale 0-5 0 being the lowest concern and 5 being of highest concern.

Figure 3 Online Survey Participant Age Range
200 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 13

CITY OF GLENDALE
Community Meetings
Two community meetings were hosted in an effort to educate Glendale residents about the pilot program and gain their input on safety concerns near where they live, work, and travel.

Translators for Spanish, Korean, and Armenian were present at these events. A recording of the virtual community meeting is hosted on the City of Glendale YouTube page.

Additional engagement efforts include Montrose Harvest Market, the City’s EV & E-Bike Guest Drive Event, email blasts, social media posts, and downtown poster boards.

CONCLUSION
The City of Glendale is committed to providing a speed safety program that will reduce speedrelated collisions and enhance the overall safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and motor vehicle occupants. Based on an analysis of speed limit violations, crash analysis, and community feedback, nine speed safety camera locations have been recommended for implementation in the pilot program. By carefully considering cost estimates and community input, the City is approaching this five-year pilot program with fiscal responsibility strategic planning. The City will track performance measures throughout the pilot program to assess the impact of the program on safety in the City.
201 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 14

CITY OF GLENDALE

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Location Recommendation Methodology
Introduction
The implementation of California AB-645 mandates the installation of speed safety camera systems in up to nine designated locations within the city of Glendale. These locations are strategically selected based on prevalent instances of high or unsafe speeds among drivers, the severity of collisions that have occurred, and the geographic circumstances of the location.

Elevated speeds significantly escalate the risk of severe injuries or fatalities in the event of a collision. Evidence supports that speed safety cameras effectively reduce instances of speeding, collisions, and associated fatalities.

The primary objective of the Speed Safety Camera Pilot Program is to mitigate speed-related safety issues, improve street safety, and reduce speed-related crashes.

Methodology
To calculate potential locations for the Speed Safety System Pilot Program, quantitative and qualitative analysis was conducted to determine the nine possible camera system locations.

This analysis included an examination of the City’s Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) study locations, speed-related crashes, speeding citations, street downgrades, and notable or unique intersection features. These 16 locations are the preliminary draft of locations. Public input and field examination will narrow the final list to the nine selected locations.

The purpose of this analysis is to define a set of locations to receive community feedback and conduct field review. Community engagement aims to solicit feedback from residents. This is performed to gather insight and garner participation in location selection. Location field review will also be conducted to assess and confirm location suitability and logistical effectiveness. This assessment establishes that speed safety cameras are strategically placed to achieve the goals of mitigating speed-related safety issues, improving street safety, and reducing speed-related crashes.

Summary of Data
The selected locations are segments of around half a mile. The actual implementation will be a shorter segment, which will be determined by field verification to determine locations of power, communication, driveways, signage, etc. The preliminary locations were selected based on an analysis of:
 TIMS 2014 to 2024 speed related collision data
 Citation data provided by the City of Glendale for a period of 4 years (2019 to 2024)  LRSP locations that were identified as having safety challenges due to speeding  Disadvantaged communities are defined by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as “the top 25% of census tracts experiencing disproportionate amounts of pollution, environmental degradation, and socioeconomic and public health conditions”
202 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 15

CITY OF GLENDALE
 Of the 16 interim locations, 12 are in census tracts designated as disadvantaged communities
A methodology flow chart of the location selection process is shown below. After determining locations using the decision flow chart, the locations were vetted based on geographical and socioeconomic factors to evaluate equal representation across the City. 203 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 16

CITY OF GLENDALE
16 Interim Locations
Locations across the city were considered based on a comprehensive analysis of data on speed-related crashes, speeding citations, and recommendations from law enforcement authorities. The locations were narrowed down to 16 recommended locations based on the frequency and severity of the aforementioned attributes.

Locations are not inherently hierarchical. Based on feedback from city officials, segment attributes were to be treated as equal, specifically speeding citations, LRSP locations, and noninjury collisions. Collisions were categorized into four categories: fatal, severe, other visible injury, and complaint of pain. While each type of collision is important when analyzing segments, segments with more fatal and severe injury collisions were chosen over those without.

Location Results
The segments and their explanations are as follows:

A. San Fernando Rd: California Ave to Colorado St
This location experienced 15 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in a fatality, 1 with severe injuries, 3 with visible injuries, and 10 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 95 speed citations in the 4-year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

B. Brand Blvd: Magnolia Ave to Maple St
This location experienced 15 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in a fatality, 3 with visible injuries, and 11 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 374 speed citations in the 4-year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

C. Verdugo Rd: Acacia Ave to Harvard St
This location experienced 9 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in a fatality, 2 with visible injuries, and 6 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 43 speed citations in the 4-year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

D. Verdugo Rd: Sunview Dr to Valihi Way
This location experienced 9 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in a fatality, 3 with visible injuries, and 5 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 7 speed citations in the 4-year period and is not classified as an LRSP location.

E. Verdugo Rd: Wabasso Way to Glorietta Ave
This location experienced 9 speed related collisions. 2 collisions resulted in severe injuries, 3 with visible injuries, and 4 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 181 speed citations and is not classified as an LRSP location.

F. Chevy Chase Dr: Lilac Ln to Sinclair Ave
This location experienced 4 speed related collisions. 2 collisions resulted in severe injuries, 1 with visible injuries, and 1 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 92 speed citations in the 4-year period and is not classified as an LRSP location. 204 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 17

CITY OF GLENDALE
G. Colorado St: Kenilworth Ave to Central Ave
This location experienced 33 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, 2 with visible injury crashes, and 30 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 100 citations during the 4-year period and is also an LRSP location.

H. Glenoaks Blvd: Allen Ave to Ruberta Ave
This location experienced 26 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, 5 with visible injuries, and 20 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 171 speed citations during the 4-year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

I. Glenoaks Blvd: Rosedale Ave to Cleveland Ave
This location experienced 19 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, 3 with visible injuries, and 15 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 409 speed citations during the 4-year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

J. San Fernando Rd: Raymond Ave to Grover Ave
This location experienced 18 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, and 17 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 53 speed citations in the 4- year period and is not classified as an LRSP location.

K. Glendale Ave: Monterey Rd to Verdugo Rd
This location experienced 16 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, 2 with visible injuries, and 13 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 1,505 speed citations during the 4-year period and is not classified as an LRSP location.

L. Glenoaks Blvd: Kenilworth Ave to Central Ave
This location experienced 11 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, 2 with visible injuries, and 8 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 661 speed citations in the 4-year period and is not classified as an LRSP location.

M. Foothill Blvd: New York Ave to Pennsylvania Ave
This location experienced 10 speed related collisions. 1 collision resulted in severe injuries, and 9 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 72 speed citations in the 4- year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

N. Brand Blvd: Harvard St to Lexington Ave
This location experienced 30 speed related collisions. 3 collisions resulted in visible injuries and 27 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 279 speed citations during the 4-year period and is not classified as an LRSP location.

O. Glendale Ave: Lomita Ave to Broadway
This location experienced 22 speed related collisions. 4 collisions resulted in visible injuries and 18 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 39 speed citations in the 4- year period and is classified as an LRSP location.

205 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 18

CITY OF GLENDALE
P. Central Ave: Broadway to Doran Ave
This location experienced 20 speed related collisions. 4 collisions resulted in visible injuries, and 16 with complaints of pain. This area yielded 80 speed citations in the 4- year period and is not classified as an LRSP location.

The remaining seven locations that are not recommended as one of the system locations are considered as potential relocations areas, if the initial locations have not shown significant reductions per the assembly bill requirements within 18 months of installation. 206 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 19

CITY OF GLENDALE
Appendix B: Community Input Locations
The following list of recommended speed safety camera locations was provided by community input. These locations were reviewed internally and provided insignificant collision data to be included on the list of proposed speed safety camera locations.

A consolidated list of additional proposed camera locations from the Glendale Speed Safety Survey are defined in detail below. The gray text indicates consolidated street segments.  Chevy Chase Dr: San Fernando to Verdugo
o Chevy Chase Dr: Mariposa St to Windsor
o Chevy Chase Dr: SR2 to Golf Club Dr
o Chevy Chase Dr: Figueroa St to Linda Vista Rd
o Chevy Chase Dr: SR2 to Emerald Island Rd
o Chevy Chase Dr: Acacia Ave to Central Ave
o Chevy Chase Dr: Central Ave to Emerald Island Rd
 La Crescenta Ave: Montrose Ave to Verdugo Rd
o La Crescenta Ave: Honolulu Ave and Arlington
 Columbus Ave: Doran St to Wilson Ave
 Kenneth Rd: Alameda Ave and Central Ave
o Kenneth Rd: Kenneth Village to Central – Pacific
o Kenneth Rd: Pacific Ave and Central Ave
o Kenneth Rd: Grandview to Brand Blvd
207 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 20

CITY OF GLENDALE
 Dunsmore Ave: Foothill Blvd to Honolulu Ave
 Pennsylvania Ave: Montrose Ave to Honolulu Ave
 Roselawn Ave: Broadview Dr to Val Verde Pl
 Broadway: Verdugo Rd to San Fernando Rd
 Grandview Ave: Mountain St to Kenneth Rd
o Mountain St near Brand Park (2)
 Pacific Ave: Cumberland Rd to Colorado St
o Pacific Ave: Cumberland Rd to Glen Oaks Blvd
o Pacific Ave: Broadway to Colorado St
o Pacific Ave: Glenoaks Blvd and Cumberland Rd
o Pacific Ave: Kenneth Rd to 134 Freeway
o Pacific Ave: Kenneth Rd to Colorado St
 Riverdale Dr: San Fernando Rd to Pacific Ave
 Victory Blvd: Allen Ave to Ruberta Ave
o Victory Blvd south of Allen Ave
 Canada Blvd: Del Valle Ave to Verdugo Rd
 Foothill Blvd: Lowell Ave to New York Ave
 Verdugo Rd: Monterey Rd to Chevy Chase Dr
 Glendale Ave: Doran St to Harvard St (overlaps with existing survey option)  Glendale Ave: Windsor Rd to Chevy Chase Dr
 Brand Ave: Doran St to Harvard St (overlaps with existing survey option)  Lorian St: Valley View Rd to Central Ave
 Glenoaks: Allen Ave to Central Ave
o Glenoaks Ave: Grandview Ave to Central Ave
o Glenoaks: Allen Ave to Central Ave
 Wilson Ave: Chevy Chase D to Brand Av
 Doran St: Glendale Ave to Brand Blvd
 Val Verde Pl: Roselawn Ave to Las Palmas Ave
 Highland Ave: Glenoaks Blvd to Cumberland Rd
 Honolulu Ave: La Crescenta Ave to Ocean View Blvd
 Elk Ave: Glendale Ave to Chevy Chase Dr
 Lomita Ave: Glendale to Chevy Chase Dr
 Harvard St: Glendale Ave to Verdugo Rd
 Sonora Ave: Flower St to Kenneth Rd
 Acacia Ave: Central Ave to Chevy Chase Dr
 Mountain St: Allen Ave to Grandview Ave
208 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 21

CITY OF GLENDALE
Appendix C: Online Survey Summary
The following summarizes the results of the stakeholder engagement and community input for the speed safety system from the online survey.

Question 1: Pick 9 locations where you think speed safety cameras would benefit the most from.

These results are reflected in the final 9 proposed camera locations decision making process.

Question 2: Provide an explanation on why you chose your top 9 speed safety camera locations.

Total number of comments received: 258
Comments were categorized into 5 categories:

I. Vehicle-related concerns (190 comments): speeding, disregarding stop signs, drag racing, reckless and aggressive driving, tailgating, loud engines, heavy traffic, limited calming measures
II. Pedestrian-related concerns (60 comments): general physical safety, death, biker safety, scooter safety, reckless driving near schools and hospitals III. Anti–Speed Safety Program (5 comments): against the overall program IV. Pro–Speed Safety Program (27 comments): neutral comments in support of camera locations and overall program
209 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 22

CITY OF GLENDALE
V. Suggestions (8 comments): traffic calming measures suggested by the public Question 3: What is your connection to the City of Glendale? If more than one answer, pick the one that best describes the reason you spend time there.

Question 4: How do you typically travel throughout the City of Glendale? Question 5: Please identify the top three driving concerns when it comes to traveling in the City of Glendale. Drag and drop the topics from the left side of the table to the right side and rank them accordingly.

210 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 23

CITY OF GLENDALE
Question 6: What is your overall opinion on the use of speed safety cameras to enforce speed limits?
Question 7: Do you believe that speed safety cameras will improve traffic safety in our city? Question 8: What concerns, if any, do you have about the implementation of speed safety cameras?
Top 3 concerns: Accuracy of the cameras, Other, TIE between Privacy Issues and Impact on low-income drivers
Question 9: What benefits do you anticipate from the use of speed safety cameras? Top 3 benefits: Increased adherence to speed limits, Enhanced road safety for pedestrians, Reduced traffic accidents
211 of 379
SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM IMPACT REPORT 24

CITY OF GLENDALE
Question 10: How old are you?
Question 11: What is the zip code where you reside?
Zip codes: 91342, 91203, 90027, 91202, 91214, 91208, 91207, 91206, 91205, 91023, 91601, 91201
Question 12: Is there anything else related to this survey you would like to share? Total number of comments received: 198
Comments were categorized into 4 categories:

I. Suggestions (95 comments): additional program elements including but not limited to increased policing/traffic enforcement, traffic calming measures, additional camera locations especially on residential streets, bike safety measures, license plate visibility, digital speed limit signage, etc.

II. General support (79 comments): personal experiences and general support related to safety enforcement measures
III. Anti-Speed Safety Program (15 comments): against the overall program IV. Questions (5 comments)
212 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
Per California Assembly Bill 645, the City of Glendale has been chosen to implement a Speed Safety Pilot Program until January 1, 2032.

The City of Glendale is committed to becoming a safer environment for residents in all transportation modes and across all abilities.

OVERVIEW

TECHNOLOGY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY
Existing law establishes a basic speed law that prohibits a person from driving a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable given the weather, visibility, traffic, and highway conditions. However, regardless of preexisting law, speed-related incidents have been a recurring issue. Vehicular speed is a concern.

Reducing potential speed-related collisions can improve overall safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and operators of motor vehicles and their passengers.
i. System Description
a) A “speed safety system” or “system” is a fixed or mobile radar or laser system or any other electronic device that utilizes automated equipment to detect a violation of speed laws and obtains a clear photograph of a speeding vehicle’s rear license plate. The system only captures data of a speeding vehicle’s rear license plate and does not capture data of non-speeding vehicles.
b) Speed safety systems in each location will detect violations for both directions of travel.
ii. System Benefits
a) Speed safety systems are a proven effective tool for reducing speeding, crashes, and traffic related injuries and fatalities.
b) Implementation of speed safety systems can assist cities in addressing excessive speeding and speed-related collisions.
c) Speed safety systems can improve and advance equity in traffic enforcement. d) System implementation can make speeding traffic enforcement more predictable and effective, which can help modify driver behavior.

213 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

DATA COLLECTION
The City of Glendale shall use any information that is retrieved from the Speed Safety System for these authorized purposes:

1. To enforce speed limits on City streets in accordance with California Vehicle Code sections 22425 – 22434, otherwise known as the Speed Safety System Pilot Program.

2. To analyze and report on speed enforcement in the Speed Safety System Pilot Program for the City of Glendale.

The City of Glendale may use information collected from technology only for legally authorized purposes and may not use that information to unlawfully discriminate against people based on race, ethnicity, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, gender, gender identity, disability status, sexual orientation or activity, or genetic and/or biometric data.

DATA STORAGE
Data will be stored and encrypted in cloud or local storage and in software as a service product.

The vendor of the system as well as the City of Glendale shall be responsible for the storing and protection of data. Data shall be stored at the discretion of the vendor. Improper data storage that results in improper access of PII data, or data that is personally identifiable, is subject to criminal and/or civil prosecution.

DATA SHARING
In order to maintain the security and privacy of surveillance technology data, the department will not share this information with other departments or entities within the City of Glendale. Under California Vehicle Code section 22425(l)(5), the City of Glendale cannot disclose or share data from speed safety security systems with anyone, including state or federal government agencies or officials for any purpose, except as required by state or federal law, court order, or in response to a subpoena in an individual case or proceeding. Improper data sharing that results in improper access of PII data, or data that is personally identifiable is subject to criminal and/or civil prosecution.

PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE AND DATA RETENTION
The use of any facial recognition technology in a speed safety system is prohibited by California state law. Any information that is collected from the surveillance system that does not result in warning or violation notice shall be destroyed and removed from the administrative system within five business days after the photograph was first taken. The City of Glendale may retain information that a vehicle has been cited by the Speed Safety System and fined for a violation for up to three years.

Confidential records and evidence may be retained for up to 60 days after final disposition of the notice of violation.

Administrative records regarding speed safety system violations may be retained for up to 120 days after final disposition of the notice of violation. Notwithstanding any other law, the 214 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
confidential records and evidence shall be destroyed in a manner that maintains the confidentiality of any person included in the record or evidence.

DATA DISPOSAL
The City of Glendale will automatically dispose of raw speed safety camera system data (e.g., speed safety camera system data that has not been anonymized or aggregated) after the applicable data retention period. In accordance with the California Vehicle Code Section 4, 22425(I)(3), photographic evidence and other confidential information from the DMV will be destroyed in a manner that ensures the confidentiality of any individuals included in the record or evidence.

TYPE(S) OF DATA COLLECTED AND VIOLATION NOTIFICATION
Speed safety systems shall capture images of rear license plates of vehicles driving at least 11 miles per hour above the posted speed limit, as well as include a real-time notification to the driver of when violations are detected.

Data collected by the speed safety system will be encrypted and secure in transit from the camera system to the vendor’s cloud storage.

Violation recipients are to receive a real-time notification via photographic camera flash at each of the speed safety camera locations. This notification system implementation ensures drivers are promptly alerted to any violations they may have committed.

The use of a camera flash provides a visual cue that is easily perceptible to violation recipients.

To the extent possible, the speed safety system shall be angled only to capture speeding violation photographs and not to capture other identifying images of vehicles, drivers, or pedestrians.

DATA ACCESS
Data or information collected from the speed safety system shall not be disclosed to any other persons and is considered confidential. The only exception is that data may be released to the registered owner or to a person identified by the registered owner as the driver at the time of an alleged violation, who may receive a copy of photographic evidence that was collected. The manufacturer or supplier of the contracted speed safety system is prohibited from sharing, repurposing, or monetizing data. Third-party data sharing is prohibited.

Data regarding the number of violations issued or speeds at which they were issued for is not photographic or administrative data and therefore not considered confidential.

Representatives from the City of Glendale who have access to the data from the speed safety system shall comply with the California Public Records Act, the requirements of the Federal and State Constitutions, Federal and State civil procedure laws and rules, and the following applicable provisions from the City of Glendale’s Administrative Policy Manual, Chapter 6, Policy 6-14:

ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY: DATA, EMAIL, INTERNET, AND COMPUTERS C. POLICY
215 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

1. Institute Appropriate Controls – City will institute mandatory appropriate controls for all Users subject to this policy to protect the City Information Assets from all threats, internal or external, deliberate or accidental, as well as ensure compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and legal obligations.

2. Security Policy Awareness and Compliance – All current Users who log-on to City computer systems shall read and sign a copy of this policy, known as “Acceptable Use Policy.” Prior to first accessing a City’s Information Assets new Users shall read this policy and, by signing it, acknowledge that they read and understood the policy.

3. Affirmation and Acceptance – Each User who accesses City Confidential Data and Information Assets shall be required to receive and affirm their understanding and acceptance of this Acceptable Use Policy.

4. Obligation of Users – All Users subject to this Acceptable Use Policy shall:
a. Comply with all applicable laws;
b. Protect the City’s Data and Information Assets; and
c. Avoid creating risk to the City by misuse of Data or Information Assets

5. Consequences of Violation- Violation of this policy and the Standards listed below may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination for employees, termination of business relations in the case of contractors or consultants, and dismissal for interns and volunteers. Additionally, individuals who fail to comply with this policy will be subject to loss of City Data resources access and civil and/or criminal prosecution.

6. This policy applies to all Users as defined in the Definition Section including Police and Fire Department personnel. Before any Police or Fire Department personnel initiate, access or conduct any e-related activity prohibited by this policy, he/she shall establish and substantiate a legitimate need, directly related to a public safety enforcement matter or criminal investigation, and be authorized by the Police Chief, Fire Chief, Police Captain or Fire Battalion Chief.

D. ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY RATIONALE

1. Comply with Security Laws – Security is everyone’s responsibility. Users shall comply with all relevant laws, regulations, and contractual requirements related to information security, thus avoiding penalties and adverse actions against them or the City.

2. Important to Protect Assets – Protecting City Information Assets (and any citizen or customer Data within its custody) by safeguarding their Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability is of paramount importance. By using a risk-based approach, the City will manage the risk of security compromise or improper exposure of City’s Information assets.

3. Policy to Minimize Risk – An Acceptable Use Policy minimizes risk by protecting City Information Assets, as well as Users. Among the most valuable of City resources is its data. This set of policies is aimed at protecting the City’s Information Assets as well as the City itself from legal liability.
216 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
F. COMPUTER ACCEPTABLE USE

1. User Accounts – User accounts and passwords given to individual authorized users are Confidential, and may not be shared. The City shall have the right to assign control and limit access to its computers through exclusive passwords. If it ever necessary for ITD staff to have User account access, ITD staff shall use that password only in the presence in the account holder and shall have the authorized user reset the password in the ITD staff member’s presence. The ITD staff member shall not know this second password.

2. Passwords – Passwords shall not be transmitted by email. Initial account setup or password change shall have a finite expiration time, not greater than 24 hours, and shall not be the same as other passwords, or constitute a predictable pattern.

3. Use of Disk Encryption – Full disk encryption shall be used on all City-owned laptops regardless of data sensitivity. Full disk encryption shall be used on all desktops containing City restricted and/or confidential data.

5. Use of Wireless Information Assets – City-owned Wireless Information Assets, such as smart phones and tablet devices shall employ a City-provided and controlled mobile device management and security architecture (MDMS), as designated by the Director of Information Technology. The MDMS shall encrypt, control, and require a password for the device. Unless directly authorized by the Director of Information Technology. The MDMS shall encrypt, control, and require a password for the device. Unless directly authorized by the Director of Information Technology or designee, no User shall disable, remove, circumvent, or otherwise tamper with the MDMS used on any Information Asset.

6. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) – If a staff member’s Personal Computing Device is brought to the workplace to conduct City business, such use shall be authorized and approved by the Department Head or designee. The Personal Computing Device may not be attached to the City network, and may only use a guest or commercial wireless (cellular) network (“WWAN”). Personal smart phones and tablet devices (personal device) shall employ a City-provided and controlled Mobile Device Management System (MDMS), as designated by the Director of Information Technology. The MDMS encrypts and controls a “container” or “partition” on the personal device. Placement of City Confidential Data is prohibited on any Personally Owned Computing Device except within the City-controlled “partition”. A Personally Owned computer is subject to the same criteria regarding privacy as City-owned equipment (including anti-malware, current patch level, firewall, and remove wipe capabilities), and it shall not be used for the transmittal or storage of City data.

7. Copyright Law – Users subject to this policy shall abide by all copyright laws related to computer system usage.

G. INFORMATION ACCEPTABLE USE

1. IT Security Prohibitions – Except for authorized personnel for job-related purposes, all users are expressly forbidden from accessing the computer security system. Users shall not download, install or run security programs or utilities such as password cracking programs, packet sniffers, or port scanners that reveal or exploit weaknesses in the 217 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
security of a City Information Asset unless approved in writing by the Director of Information Technology.

2. Tampering Prohibited – Staff is expressly prohibited from tampering with or attempting to tamper with, the City Information Assets security system with the intent or result of the obstruction, destruction or modification of City data.

3. Report Security Weaknesses – All suspected intrusions via the Internet or by unauthorized staff are to be reported to the Information Technology Department’s Information Security Information Manager and appropriate Department management personnel immediately. Users shall report any suspected weaknesses in City Information Asset security to the Information Technology Department’s Information Security Manager. Weaknesses in Information Asset security include unexpected software or system behavior, which may result in unintentional disclosure of data or exposure to security threats.

4. Report Security Violations – Users shall report any incidents of possible misuse or violation of this Acceptable Use Policy through the use of a documented report sent to ITD, or reporting to the ITD department by a traceable means. This includes reporting incidents to the Service Desk (Help Desk) at (818) 548-4085 or by sending an e-mail to Service Desk by typing “HELP” in the e-mail address box. Reporting incidents to a supervisor who then informs ITD is also acceptable.

5. Unauthorized Access Prohibited – Users shall not attempt to access any data, documents, email correspondence, or programs contained on City Information Assets for which they do not have the authorization.

6. System Access Information Security – Systems administrators and authorized users shall not divulge passwords, accounts, remote connection modem phone numbers or other access points of City computer resources to anyone without proper authorization.

7. End User Access Information Security – Users shall not share their account(s), passwords, Personal Identification Numbers (PIN), Security Tokens (i.e. Smartcard), or similar data or devices used for identification and authorization purposes.

8. Software Copying Prohibited – Users shall not make unauthorized copies of City-owned software.

9. Users Software Installation Prohibited – Users shall not use or install any non-City approved software. The use of non-standard shareware or freeware software without the appropriate ITD approval is strictly prohibited. All software purchases and installation shall be preapproved by ITD in writing. Furthermore, all installation shall only be performed by authorized ITD staff.

10. Degradation or Circumvention of Authorizations Prohibited – Users shall not engage in activity that may degrade the performance of City Data Assets; deprive an authorized user access to City Information Assets; obtain extra Information Assets beyond those allocated; or circumvent City Information Asset measures. 218 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

11. Use of City Information Assets Remotely – Access to the Internet from City-owned Information Assets from off campus locations such as home, or publicly available networks are subject to this policy. While connected to the City network users shall use their City-owned Information Assets as if physically on campus. Specifically, users shall comply with the email policy as described herein, as well as refrain from visiting web sites prohibited by the city regardless of the user’s physical location. This policy is in effect at all times including non-work hours and during personal vacation. Users shall not allow family members or other users subject to this policy to access City Information Assets.

12. Disclosure of City Information – Users shall take all necessary steps to avoid unintended disclosure of City Information. While the city is subject to the California Public Records Act, the City has an established process for handling such requests and asserting lawful exemptions when appropriate. Users shall exercise due care when accessing City Information remotely when performing their duties to protect such Information from disclosure. Willful misuse of City Information is in violation of this policy.

13. Report Security Issues - Any security issues discovered by Users subject to this policy shall be reported to the Director of Information Technology, or designee, for follow-up investigation.

14. Use of Anti-Malware Software - Users shall use ITD-approved anti-malware- scanning software on all files downloaded from the Internet or City network. This software shall be configured to update automatically at least once per day. The anti- malware software shall not have a user configuration enabled that allows Users to turn off the software, except with the written permission of the Director of ITD.

15. Conform to Authorized Access Processes - Each Internet or e-mail user shall follow the authorized access process, logon procedures and password protection requirements at all times. Users subject to this policy shall not use any account or password unless specifically authorized.

16. Email Access Policy - Users may not access another's e-mail messages, unless this access shall be by proxy, (i.e. as a delegate granted access privileges by the e-mail account "owner" and not by sharing passwords). E-mail messages may be forwarded to City staff unless specifically identified by the email's author as confidential. Emails containing attorney/client privileged data shall not be forwarded to non-city personnel.

17. Conform to Authorized Access for Confidential & Medical Records - Users subject to this Policy are expressly prohibited from accessing or attempting to access any secured confidential personal or medical information on the City's Information Assets or from disclosing any confidential personal or medical information. Access or disclosure of such information may only occur by directive of the City Manager, or designee, or as necessary for the Confidential conduct of personnel management or litigation purposes, in any case, such information may not be released until specifically permitted by the City Attorney and as required by law.

18. City Information Assets are Property of City - Electronic files created, sent, received, or stored on Information Assets owned, leased, administered, or otherwise under the custody and control of the City are the property of the City and employee use of these 219 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
files is neither personal nor private. Authorized ITD Security staff may access all such files at any time without knowledge of the Information Assets User or owner for purposes of maintaining the security of City Information Assets.

19. Restrictions on Local or Removable Storage - All data stored, created, or accessed, shall be accessed directly from the City network or from the network through a security architecture provided and controlled by the City, local and removable storage shall only be used if the data sensitivity is low, or the local or removable drives are encrypted with an ITD approved encryption method. Local and removable storage are always intended to be temporary. Data file backup copies shall always be stored on the City network.

TRAINING
To reduce the possibility that surveillance technology or its associated data will be misused or used contrary to its authorized use, all individuals requiring access must receive training on data security policies and procedures before being granted access to systems containing confidential data.

The City of Glendale shall require all elected officials, employees, consultants, volunteers, and vendors working with the technology on its behalf to read and formally acknowledge all authorized and prohibited uses dictated by this policy.

The City of Glendale shall also require that all individuals requesting data or regularly requiring data access receive appropriate training before being granted access to systems containing PII data, or data and information that can identify individuals from others.

The City of Glendale shall ensure employees and vendors are trained on how to use the speed safety systems correctly and ensure data is used for its intended use only. Training includes explaining how employees and vendors can use data and how to report problems with the speed safety camera system.

The responsible party of the City of Glendale will develop a specified process for confidentiality training and processes.

All parties requesting access must adhere to the following rules and processes:
 Only authorized users may use speed safety camera technology or access data.  Authorized users must log into tablet or computer, as applicable, to access speed safety camera system data.
 Data that is accessed shall be secured with multi-factor authentication and secure passwords as a minimum safeguard.

EMPLOYEE ACCESS
Once collected, the following roles and job titles are authorized to access and use data collected, retained, processed or shared by the surveillance technology:
 Representatives from the City of Glendale

PUBLIC ACCESS
220 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
The City of Glendale will comply with the California Public Records Act, the requirements of the federal and State Constitutions, and federal and State civil procedure laws and rules. Collected data that is classified as Level 1-Public data may be made available for public access under the City of Glendale’s discretion. No record shall be withheld from disclosure in its entirety unless all information contained in it is exempt from disclosure under express provisions of the California Public Records Act or some other statute.

DATA SECURITY
The City of Glendale shall secure photographic or administrative data against unauthorized or unlawful processing or disclosure; unwarranted access, manipulation, or misuse; and accidental loss, destruction, or damage. Surveillance technology data collected and retained by the City of Glendale shall be protected by the safeguards appropriate for its classification level(s) as defined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) security framework 800- 53, or equivalent requirements from other major cybersecurity frameworks selected by the City.

The City of Glendale will secure any PII against unauthorized access, processing, disclosure, and accidental loss, destruction, or damage. Speed safety camera system data collected and retained by the City of Glendale will be protected by the safeguards appropriate for its classification level(s). To protect speed safety camera data from unauthorized access, including misuse, the City of Glendale shall, at minimum, apply the following safeguards:
 Authorized users will log in credentials with multi-factor authentication, and use complex passwords to access the speed safety camera system technology.  All access to and activity in the speed safety camera system data will be logged and be audited.

OVERSIGHT PERSONNEL
The Department of Public Works shall assign representatives from the Department of Public Works to oversee Policy compliance by the City of Glendale and third parties.

POLICY VIOLATIONS
Failure to comply with this Policy may result in appropriate disciplinary measures based on the severity of the violation. These measures may include written warnings, suspensions, or termination of employment.
221 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

CIVIL PENALTIES
Speed limits promote road safety by establishing an upper limit on speed appropriate for the street’s design, vehicle volume and pedestrian density. Civil penalties or fines can reduce speeding and speed-related incidents.

FINES
The following fines will be issued for these scenarios:
a. Fifty dollars ($50) for driving at a speed of 11 to 15 miles per hour over the posted speed limit.
b. One hundred dollars ($100) for driving at a speed of 16 to 25 miles per hour over the posted speed limit.
c. Two hundred dollars ($200) for driving at a speed of 26 miles per hour or more over the posted speed limit.
d. Five hundred dollars ($500) for driving at a speed of 100 miles or more per hour.

VIOLATIONS
A vehicle’s first violation within designated jurisdiction for traveling speeds 11 to 15 miles per hour above the posted speed limit shall receive a warning notice. Violations made within the first 60 days of program implementation shall be issued warning notices rather than notice of violation. Warnings and violation notices shall be issued to registered owner of the vehicle.

Diversion programs shall be offered through the City of Glendale. A diversion program shall be offered for indigent speed safety system violation recipients with performance of community service in lieu of paying civil penalties otherwise indigent speed safety system violation recipients shall have the ability to pay civil penalties over a period of time with monthly installments of no more than twenty-five dollars ($25) per month. Applicable fines and penalties have the ability to be reduced by 80 percent for indigent persons, and by 50 percent for individuals up to 250 percent above the federal poverty level. Indigent speed safety system violation recipients may also perform community service in lieu of paying the penalty for a speed system violation.

California Code, Business and Professions Code Section 6213 deems an "Indigent person" as a person whose income is (1) 125 percent or less of the current poverty threshold established by the United States Office of Management and Budget, or (2) who is eligible for Supplemental Security Income or free services under the Older Americans Act or Developmentally Disabled Assistance Act.

The person may demonstrate that they are indigent or are up to 250 percent above the poverty level by providing either of the following information, as applicable:

1. Proof of income from a pay stub or another form of proof of earnings, such as a bank statement, that shows that the person meets the income criteria set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 68632 of the California Government Code, subject to review and approval by the City of Glendale by emailing [email protected]. The processing agency or its designee shall not unreasonably withhold its approval. 222 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

2. Proof of receipt of benefits under the programs described in subdivision (a) of Section 68632 of the California Government Code, including, but not limited to, an electronic benefits transfer card or another card, subject to review and approval by the processing agency.

PAYMENTS
The Glendale Police Department does not accept any form of payment.

Speed Safety System Citations to be paid to The Parking Enforcement Service Center.

If violation recipients have questions regarding speed safety system citations, they may contact The City of Glendale parking citation service center at (866) 470-3088. Violation recipients are to citation information ready when calling.

Pay Online
Pay online at https://www.dsparkingportal.com/glendale. Those paying online will be required to enter some citation information. Most major credit cards and debit cards displaying the Visa or Mastercard logo are accepted. There is a $3.95 fee for this service.

Pay by Phone
Call (866) 470-3088 to pay by phone. Violation recipients are to citation information ready when calling. Most major credit cards and debit cards displaying the Visa or Mastercard logo are accepted. There is a $3.95 fee for this service.

Pay by Mail
Violation recipients shall not send cash. Check or money order are applicable and payable to the City of Glendale. Violation recipients are to denote citation number on the written check or money order. If recipients were not provided an envelope, they shall submit payment to the following address:

The City of Glendale
Parking Enforcement Service Center
P.O. Box 6010
Inglewood, CA 90312-6010

CONTESTING A SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM CITATION
The City of Glendale adheres to the guidelines prescribed by the California Vehicle Code with regard to the contesting of speed safety system citations. Contesting a speed safety system citation is a three-step process. In order to participate in this process violation recipients must adhere to the following guidelines:

1. Administrative Review
Violation recipients must submit requests within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date the citation was issued, or fourteen (14) calendar days from the mailing of a Notice of Violation. Recipients of a speed safety system citation may contest their citation online at:
https://www.dsparkingportal.com/glendale
223 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

2. Administrative Hearing
If the received citation was upheld in Step 1, violation recipients may proceed with an administrative hearing. Violation recipients shall be sure to carefully follow the instructions on the Administrative Review Decision - Liable form that was mailed to the recipient. State Law requires that violation recipients submit payment owed on the citation when proceeding with this step except as provided in Section 40215 (b) of the California Vehicle Code.

Request and payments must be received no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days of the mailing of the results of the Administrative Review in Step 1. Failing to meet these requirements will result in the citation being upheld and will have waived the ability to further contest the citation.

3. Court Appeal
If the citation is upheld in Step 2, violation recipients may file an appeal of the finding with the Los Angeles Superior Court, 111 N. Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Notice of Appeal form from the court must be obtained. There is a court-imposed filing fee of $25 for this process. The appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of the mailing of the Administrative Hearing officer’s findings. A copy of the appeal must also be filed with the City of Glendale, Office of the City Attorney, located at 613 E. Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206-4394. Failure to timely file this appeal will result in waiver to have the matter heard by the court.

If the presiding Judge dismisses a citation, the $25 filing fee along with the parking fine will be refunded to individual the citation was given to.

224 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of surveillance technology for the Speed Safety System has been carefully assessed, reviewed and analyzed. Specific locations with enforcement cameras can expect an increase in street safety and equity. Areas chosen experience a high vehicle collision rate, or are in geographic areas that have or transport populations that are more vulnerable or susceptible to injury by vehicular collision or speeding.

The initial factors established by AB 645 for eligibility implementation include:
 Cameras will be positioned on streets with a high rate of accidents, in school zones, on streets notorious for speed racing incidents, or meet the standards of a safety corridor under Section 22358.7 of the California Vehicle Code.  Cameras cannot be located on state highways or freeways.  Speed safety systems shall be in locations that are geographically and socioeconomically diverse.

REASONING OF CAMERA SYSTEM PLACEMENT
The City of Glendale can implement up to nine speed safety cameras. This number of cameras is proportionate to, in accordance with California AB-645. AB-645 states that a jurisdiction with a population of less than 300,000 shall receive no more than nine systems, and Glendale has a population of just under 200,000 (according to the U.S. 2020 Census).

LOCATION SELECTION
The locations of the speed safety camera systems and hours of enforcement will be posted on the City of Glendale’s speed safety program website, which shall be updated if the City of Glendale changes enforcement locations and/or hours of enforcement.

GlendaleSpeedSafety.com

SYSTEM REVENUE
Revenues derived from any program utilizing a speed safety system for speed limit enforcement shall first be used to recover program costs. Program costs include, but are not limited to, the construction of traffic-calming measures, the installation of speed safety systems, the adjudication of violations, and reporting speed system impacts.

PROGRAM DURATION
Systems can expect to be implemented for a duration of five years from initial implementation.

SCHOOL ZONES
Existing law states that California school zones are to have a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, and implementation of speed photo enforcement cameras can lead to a safer school zone.

Speed safety systems that are placed in school zones shall only enforce the school zone speed limit during the following times:
225 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE
 Up to one hour before regular school hours
 10 minutes after school sessions begin
 One hour during lunch period
 Up to one hour after school sessions conclude
Flashing beacons shall be installed on a school zone sign and be active during the times that the school zone speed limit is enforced with the speed safety system.

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Designated camera locations must clearly identify the presence of the speed safety system by signs stating, “Photo Enforced,” along with the posted speed limit no more than 500 feet before the placement of the system. The signs shall be visible to traffic traveling on the street from the direction of travel for which the system is utilized and shall be posted at all locations as may be determined necessary by the Department of Transportation after consultation with the California Traffic Control Devices Committee.

The hours of enforcement for each speed safety camera system and the streets that have been approved for enforcement must be posted on the City of Glendale’s speed safety program website, which shall be updated if the City of Glendale changes locations of enforcement.

GlendaleSpeedSafety.com
The City of Glendale shall ensure the speed safety system is regularly inspected, but no less than once every 60 days, and certifies that the system is installed and operating properly. Each camera unit shall be calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and at least once per year by an independent calibration laboratory. Documentation of the regular inspection, operation, and calibration of the system shall be retained at least 180 days after the date on which the system has been permanently removed from use.

A speed safety system at a specific location shall be operated for no more than 18 months after installation of a system, unless one of the following thresholds has been met:

1. A reduction in the 85th percentile speed of vehicles compared to data collected before the system was in operation.

2. A 20-percent reduction in vehicles that exceed the posted speed limit by 10 miles per hour or more compared to data collected before the system was in operation.

3. A 20-percent reduction in the number of violators who received two or more violations at the location since the system became operational.

The City of Glendale need not apply the above thresholds if traffic calming measures per AB645 Section 4, 22425 (p) have been implemented. If the percentage of violations has not decreased by the metrics identified in California AB-645 within one year after traffic-calming measures have completed construction, the City of Glendale shall either construct additional traffic-calming measures or cease operation of the system on that street.

226 of 379

SPEED SAFETY SYSTEM USE POLICY

CITY OF GLENDALE

QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS
Public complaints or concerns may be submitted to the City of Glendale by calling the Department of Public Works at (818) 548-3900 or by emailing [email protected].

The City of Glendale shall acknowledge and respond to complaints and concerns in a timely and organized manner.
227 of 379
9b
25-89258

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Appointment of Glendale members to the Valley Economic Alliance (VEA) and the San Fernando Valley Council of Governments (SFVCOG).

1. Motion appointing an additional member to the Valley Economic Alliance (VEA); and

2. Motion appointing a new member to the San Fernando Valley Council of Governments.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for December 16, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A member of Council has requested that the City Council appoint an additional member to the Valley Economic Alliance (VEA). At the December 9, 2025 City Council meeting, Councilmember Asatryan also requested her colleague's support in assigning a new member to the San Fernando Valley Council of Governments (SFVCOG) in her place, in consideration of scheduling conflicts with her appointment and meeting commitments at the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority.
228 of 379
9b 2
25-89258

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council consider a request to appoint an additional member to the Valley Economic Alliance (VEA), and appoint a new member to the San Fernando Valley Council of Governments (SFVCOG) Board on behalf of the City of Glendale.

ANALYSIS
A member of Council has requested that the City Council appoint an additional member to the Valley Economic Alliance (VEA). While the VEA's protocols follow that the member City's Mayor can appoint additional members to this Board, the City of Glendale City Council's protocols is to bring an item to City Council for a formal consideration and appointment. Upon City Council director, the Mayor can communicate this interest to the VEA Board for their consideration and vote to create and appoint an additional member for a three-year term. Currently, the City of Glendale's representative is Soua Vang, Deputy Director of Community Development/ Economic Development.

At the December 9, 2025 City Council meeting, Councilmember Asatryan requested her colleague's support in assigning a new member to the San Fernando Valley Council of Governments (SFVCOG) Board of Directors in her place in consideration of scheduling conflicts with her appointment and meeting commitments at the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority. Members to this Board are appointed to serve a four-year term as a voting delegate, and a full-time staff member is assigned at the alternate. This appointment is expiring on May 31, 2029, and as such, staff recommends City Council's consideration of a new appointment to fulfill the remainder of this position.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.
229 of 379
9b 3
25-89258

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
N/A
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1) Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Roubik R. Golanian, City Manager
Prepared by:

Domenica Megerdichian, Assistant to the City Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
230 of 379
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby selects and appoints _________________ as Glendale’s member on the Valley Economic Alliance. Said appointment shall be effective immediately.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
231 of 379
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby selects and appoints _________________ to replace Councilmember Elen Asatryan on the San Fernando Valley Council of Governments. Said appointment shall be effective immediately.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
232 of 379
10a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: 126-128 South Kenwood Street Stage II Final Design Review (Case No. PDR002684-2023).

1. Motion to Approve Stage II Final Design Review (Case No. PDR-002684- 2023);

2. Motion to Continue the Matter, Directing the City Attorney to Draft Findings to Deny Stage II Final Design Review (Case No. PDR-002684-2023).

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for December 16, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed Stage II Final Design Review application for Council’s consideration consists of demolition of an existing single-family residence and detached garage at 128 South Kenwood Street, and the construction of a new 40-unit, 5-story multi-family development (3 very low income units) with 69 parking spaces, and 1,500 square feet of public open space area (“Project”) at 126-128 S. Kenwood Street. The site at 126 S.

Kenwood Street is currently vacant. The entire Project site consists of 14,988 square feet and is in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) East Broadway District.

The Stage II Final Design Review Project includes:
• Ten (10) one-bedroom units and 30 two-bedroom units.
• 69 parking spaces (45 standard, 24 tandem) in two levels of subterranean parking.
• Publicly accessible open space on the ground floor along southwest corner of the property.
• Private outdoor areas at the ground level along the north and south of the property, an outdoor deck on the top floor and balconies for each unit. 233 of 379
2 10a

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
One of the City’s major goals is to maintain, preserve, and develop balanced housing opportunities.

The proposed development provides 40 new residential units within the East Broadway District with direct access to jobs, services, transit, and other Downtown amenities. The Project also contributes housing units to help meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) numbers. Furthermore, on April 16, 2025, the Director of Community Development approved a Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan for an approximately 30% density bonus that provides 9% (3 units) of the base density (31 units) for very low-income households.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Stage II Final Design Review for the proposed multi-family development located at 126-128 S. Kenwood Street.

SITE DESCRIPTION
The 14,998 SF (0.34 acre) Project site consists of two adjoining lots and is located midblock along S. Kenwood Street between E. Broadway and E. Harvard Street. The lot that is addressed as 126 S. Kenwood Street has been vacant since 1990 and originally featured residential development. The second lot that is addressed as 128 S. Kenwood Street, was developed in 1920 with a Craftsman-style single-family residence and detached garage. Both the single-family residence and garage located at 128 S. Kenwood Street will be demolished as part of the Project.

BACKGROUND
On July 30, 2024, City Council reviewed and approved the project as a Stage I Preliminary Design Review subject to site plan redesign to relocate the ground floor open space including publicly accessible open space to the south of the property adjacent to historic house at 132 Kenwood Street. Consequently, the applicant redesigned the project site plan where the proposed 1,500 square foot publicly open space and 1,056 square foot private open space are located to the south of the property. Additional private open space (1,016 square feet) is located to the north of the project site adjacent to the existing six story multifamily development (Exhibits 7 & 8).

To provide open space to the north and to the south of the property, an Administrative Exception (Case No. PAE-003846-2024) was approved with conditions by the Planning Hearing Officer on December 16, 2024 (Exhibit 6). This approval allowed a publicly accessible open space with a minimum dimension of 24 feet in width and 62 feet 6 inches in length where Downtown Specific Plan/East Broadway District requires a minimum of 30 feet by 40 feet. As a result, the project provides a separation of 15 feet 9 234 of 379
3 10a
inches between the proposed building and six (6)-story building to the north and 27 feet, 2 inches between the proposed building and the adjacent historic single-family house to the south. The Administrative Exception approval provides additional open space to the north of the project and therefore offering greater visual relief and a more functional open area. Furthermore, the approval enhances additional light and air access for occupants of all three buildings.

On April 16, 2025, the project received Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan (Case No. PDBP-004226-2024) approval with conditions by the Director of Community Development to allow the construction of a new 5-story, 45,983 square foot multi-family residential project with 40 residential units featuring three (3) affordable units restricted to very low-income households (Exhibit 5). The maximum base density for the Project is 90 dwelling units per acre in the DSP East Broadway District, resulting in 31 units for this Project. Pursuant to Density Bonus law, if providing 15% of the base density units to very low-income households (31 x 0.15 = 4.65, rounded up to 5 very low-income units), the Project is eligible for a 50% density bonus, which would allow the maximum density to increase to 47 units. The Project, however, proposes 40 units, resulting in a density bonus request of 30%, which requires the Project to provide 9% of the base density units to very low-income households (31 x 0.08 = 2.48, rounded up to 3). The project proposes 3.06 FAR while 2.75 FAR is the maximum permitted by right in the DSP East Broadway District for projects utilizing the DSP Community Benefits program for a Density Bonus affordable housing project. The project requested a FAR concession for the development to allow a total of 3.06 (45,983 SF) exceeding the maximum allowable FAR by 0.31 (4,780 SF). No other concessions or waivers were requested by the applicant.

On August 28, 2025, the project was reviewed by Design Review Board (DRB) as an advisory body, in accordance with Code Section 30.47.070 (E) review procedures. The DRB proposed five recommendations (Exhibit 4). The recommendations were as follows:

1. Evenly distribute the project’s open space between the northern and southern interior yards to balance open space on both sides of the building.

2. Minimize excessive amount of lighting to reduce glare.

3. Re-study window placements on the north façade to minimize potential line of sight privacy concerns.

4. Redesign the balconies on the north elevation to have solid or obscure glass instead of open metal railing to obscure the project’s private outdoor spaces.

1. The LED recessed balcony lighting fixtures were removed to minimize glare. The lighting fixtures mounted on the balcony walls will remain as shown on the building elevations (Exhibit 1, Sheets A4-0, A4-1, A4-2, A4-3). The lighting fixture design sample (matt bronze up/down accent) is shown on the material board (Exhibit 1, Sheet A6.3)..

2. The window placements for the project were studied and included in the submitted packet (Exhibit 1, Sheet A2-2). The north elevation plan remained the same as proposed in terms of window placements for the project However, the applicant redesigned the balconies facing north to have solid balconies instead of open guardrails as shown on the north elevation plan (Exhibit 1, Sheet A4-1).

3. Rooftop screening was included within revised plans obscuring the rooftop air conditioning units with 50-inch-high metal panels to minimize visual impact from adjacent six-story multifamily residential building as shown on the roof plan (Exhibit 1, Sheet A3-6).

4. The proposed project site plan has not been modified for open space as recommended by the Design Review Board because the project is consistent with the Administrative Exemption (Case No. PAE-003846-2024) approval which provides open space to the north and to the south of the building.

Neighboring Zones and Uses
The subject property is located in the Downtown Specific Plan - East Broadway District (DSP/EB) This district was first created in 2003 with the adoption of the City’s official mixed-use zoning districts: Residential Mixed-Use (RMU) and Commercial Mixed-Use (CMU). This area, which is located between the former Central Glendale Redevelopment Area and the Civic Center, combines a number of civic and cultural uses and historic buildings, and builds upon the mixed-use, moderate density of this area with newer mixed-use projects including upper-level housing and retail along Broadway.

Zoning Existing Uses
North DSP – East Broadway
District
6-story, multi-family residential building
South DSP – East Broadway
District
2-story, multi-family residential development
East DSP – East Broadway
District
1-story multi-tenant commercial building,
3-story multi-family residential building
West DSP – East Broadway
District
9-story, multi-family residential development (senior
housing), a surface parking lot
236 of 379
5 10a

ANALYSIS
Proposed Project
The proposed Stage II Final Design Review application for Council’s consideration consists of demolition of an existing single-family residence and detached garage at 128 South Kenwood Street, and the construction of a new 40-unit, 5-story multi-family development (3 very low income units) with 69 parking spaces, and 1,500 square feet of public open space area (“Project”) at 126-128 S. Kenwood Street. The site at 126 S.

Kenwood Street is currently vacant. The entire Project site consists of 14,988 square feet and is in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) East Broadway District.

Parking and Circulation
The applicant was granted a density bonus in accordance with State Density Bonus Law (CA Gov’t Code section 65915) and SB 330. Under CA Gov’t Code section 65915, the applicant is entitled to reduced parking requirements. The Project provides 69 parking spaces (45 standard, 24 tandem) in two levels of subterranean parking. For reference, the table below illustrates the minimum number of parking requirements established in the Zoning Code (Table 30-32-A, GMC section

30.32.050), and the parking requirements established under CA Gov’t Code section 65915. Vehicular access is onto the property is proposed from a driveway entrance that is located on the rear alley.

Project
Site
DSP – East Broadway
District
1-story single-family residence
237 of 379
5 10a
238 of 379
6 10a
Unit Type Zoning Code
Standard
Required #
of Spaces
Density Bonus
Standard
Required # of
spaces
1-bedroom 1 space/unit 10 0.5 space/ bedroom 5
2-bedroom 2 spaces/unit 60 0.5 space/ bedroom 30
Guest
Parking
1 space/10
units 4 Not required 0
Total Required 74 Total Required 30
Total Provided 69 Total Provided 69
Stage II Design Review Analysis
Design review for projects in the DSP districts is performed by the City Council. A Stage II Design indicates the completion of the final design phase. The site planning, mass and scale, and architectural style and details of the Project have been analyzed by staff in regard to the DSP East Broadway District standards and objective design standards applicable to the Project, as detailed below.

SITE PLANNING – DSP Chapter 4.1 Urban Design
Overall Site Plan – The original building plans reviewed during Stage I preliminary design review proposed an L-shaped building where the building occupied the majority of the site. A 1,500 SF entry courtyard area (publicly accessible open space) was proposed to the north of the property adjacent to the 6-story multi-family building oriented towards Kenwood Street. Beyond that, there was an additional 1,500 SF outdoor area (private open space) for the residents that were on a raised platform.

For Stage II Final Design Review proposal, the project is redesigned according to July 30, 2024, City Council direction. Publicly accessible open space is located at the ground level at the southwest corner of the property. Approximately 1,056 square foot open space was also added to the south of the property. Additional 1,016 square foot private open space is proposed to the north of the property adjacent to the 6-story building. The revised project satisfied the City Council Stage I Preliminary Review condition.

Vehicular access to the subterranean parking remains unchanged in Stage II Final Design Review. The proposed driveway is located at the existing rear alley. This alley is L-shaped and currently can be accessed from East Harvard Street to the 239 of 379
7 10a
south, and South Jackson Street to the east. Parking is provided at two levels of subterranean parking and remains unchanged for Stage II Final Design Review application. However, the number of parking spaces is reduced from 73 to 69 in the modified proposal.

4.1.2 Building Heights & Floor Area Ratios
DSP Standards
East Broadway District Project Design
Height (by right) 65 FT maximum
Height (w/ incentive) 80 FT maximum
65 FT
Density (by right) 2.0 FAR maximum
Density (w/ incentive) N/A – must comply with DSP
Standards

3.06 FAR
As noted in the table, the proposed Project in Stage II Final Design Review is 65 feet high with a 3.06 FAR, and while the Project complies with the maximum height permitted by right, it exceeded the maximum FAR. On April 16, 2025, the project received Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan approval (Case No. PDBP-004226-2024) with one concession (3.06 FAR).

4.1.3 Building Setbacks
The Project site features a Residential designation along Kenwood Street.

Projects in the DSP located along a residential street are required to have a minimum 15-foot setback from the curb face (4-ft. parkway, 6-ft. sidewalk, 5-ft. average building adjacent zone). The Project complies with the required streetscape and setback standards on Kenwood Street. For more detail, see the Pedestrian Realm – DSP Chapter 4.3 section below.

The Project building setback along Kenwood Street remained unchanged in Stage II Final Design Review.

4.1.4 Publicly Accessible Open Space
The Project provides the required publicly accessible open space within an entry courtyard fronting Kenwood Street. As required, the publicly accessible open space is 100% open to the sky and is oriented towards and accessed from a public street.
240 of 379
8 10a
The publicly accessible open space is relocated to the south of the property as directed by City Council during Stage I Design Review. The programming of the 1,500 SF publicly accessible open space area includes a water feature and outdoor seating, hardscape and landscaping. The architect has submitted a landscape plan that shows the programming of these areas for consideration.

BUILDING DESIGN – DSP Chapter 4.2 Urban Design
Overall Building Design – The City Council reviewed the overall building design in Stage I Preliminary Design Review which was geared towards the overall Massing & Scale of the development.

The overall design of the building’s mass and scale has not changed since Stage I Preliminary Design Review. The 65-foot-tall residential development has appropriately incorporated the required height and façade modulations into the design which add visual interest to both the skyline, as well as at the street-level. This Project features a building frontage of 89’-11” along Kenwood Street and features a 11’-0” height modulation at the uppermost floor. The design also incorporates a minimum of 24’-10” upper floor step back, as well as the major and minor façade modulations. Combined with detailing, articulation, and window patterns these height and façade modulations and the building separations provide visual interest at the pedestrian level and reduces the imposing appearance of the building’s mass over the public right-of-way.

The Project is a contemporary design and utilizes architectural solutions (building materials, texture, offset building massing, recessed entries, windows, balconies, and public open space) to articulate the street-facing façades. Overall, the design addresses the public sidewalk, with the design of the street-level facades appropriately detailed with human-scaled high-quality materials. A general analysis of the Project’s architectural elements is provided below. Certain subsections of Chapter 4 that are not relevant to the Project are excluded, resulting in some jumps between the numbered sections below.

4.2.2 Massing & Scale: Modulation of Height
Of the four available options in this DSP section, the Project continued to incorporate the roofline height modulation option which requires a modulation of at least ten feet for every 150 linear feet of building along each street frontage.

This Project features a building frontage of 89’-11” along Kenwood Street and 11’-0” height modulation at the upper floor. The roofline height modulation adds 241 of 379
9 10a
visual interest to the skyline, while reducing the scale of the building. The design also features a 24’-6” step back at the upper floor which allows for multiple roofline profiles and reduces the imposing appearance of the building’s mass over the public right-of-way.

4.2.3 Massing & Scale: Façade Modulation
The Project continued to incorporate the major and minor façade modulation standards outlined in this section into the overall building design. These major and minor façade modulations are illustrated on the Project plans and comply with the DSP standards. Along with detailing, articulation, and window patterns, these modulations provide visual interest at the pedestrian level.

4.2.7 Architectural Elements
The proposed residential development features a contemporary design and incorporates a number of architectural elements and design features that articulate the building façades, including high quality and varied building materials, offset building massing, balconies, recessed entries, windows and awnings. These features create a design that is unique and identifiable, while recognizing the priorities of the DSP to promote pedestrian activity and enhance ground level architectural elements to be human scaled. An analysis of the materials is provided below in Section 4.2.8. Overall, the street-level façade is incorporated into the building design while also addressing the public sidewalk through the use of high-quality materials as well as providing a differentiation in the base of the building. At the ground level along Kenwood Street, the design also features a publicly accessible courtyard and landscaping that improve the pedestrian environment. The base and top of the windows are differentiated in the building design, and the large expanses of glass are subdivided into smaller units. The ground floor is visually separated from the floors above through the use of a metal canopy and the application of materials at the base of the building.

In addition to widening the sidewalks to comply with the building setback requirements and providing parkway improvements, at the ground floor the Project features a landscaped courtyard and planter areas that provide a buffer for the ground floor residential units. The architect has submitted a landscape plan that shows the programming of these areas for consideration.

4.2.8 Architectural Elements: Materials
242 of 379
10 10a
The Project continues to feature a combination of traditional and modern highquality materials and finishes that include metal composite material (MCM) horizontal siding with a finish that looks like wood, MCM aluminum flat panels in an off-white, vertical metal panels in dark grey, and aluminum doors and windows. The design also features stucco cladding on the rear and side façades in dark grey and off-white colors that will have a dirt pickup resistance (DPR) finish. The DSP restricts no more than 60% of the building elevations to be clad with stucco or plaster. The proposed materials are consistent with the contemporary aesthetic of the design, and the standards outlined in this section of the DSP which encourage human-scaled materials to reinforce the pedestrian character of the public realm. The building designs use the materials to differentiate between the different volumes of the building.

4.2.10 Architectural Elements: Building Lobbies & Entries The building’s primary entrance is located along Kenwood Street. While it is setback from the sidewalk, the overall design is appropriate and integrates the entry with the public realm. The entry is highlighted by a metal canopy with the building name, a green-screen wall, and the MCM wood-like cladding wraps the volume of the ground-floor leasing office a wood cladding. The paving material for this entry area is distinct and differentiates from the sidewalk and the paving of the publicly accessible open space courtyard area.

4.2.11 Architectural Elements: Stoops & Ground Level Residential Entries The building lobby has incorporated a stoop into the entry design at the ground level with a raised entry that creates visual interest. The stoop complies with the DSP requirements and is a maximum 36” above grade, with a covered porch area greater than 20 square feet, and more than 4-feet wide with planters incorporated into the overall design and located adjacent to the sidewalk.

4.2.13 Architectural Elements: Canopies
The DSP requires at least 50% of the street elevations to include canopies or marquees. At the ground floor entry to the building, a metal canopy has been incorporated into the design that complements the contemporary design aesthetic.

4.2.14 Architectural Elements: Balconies
243 of 379
11 10a
The Project includes a variety of projecting and recessed balconies for the residential units. Per the DSP, no balconies shall overhang the public right-ofway or building setback, and no more than 40% of the balconies shall extend beyond the façade of the building (25% maximum projection of balcony’s full depth). The balcony material is horizontal steel cable guardrails in black that is compatible with the overall building design. The proposed balconies are welldesigned and create a visually interesting façade within the well-articulated building elevations.

During Design Review Board Advisory meeting, the Board recommended that the balconies facing north toward the 6-story building be redesigned to have solid or obscure glass instead of open metal railing to obscure the project’s private outdoor spaces. Consequently, the applicant redesigned the balconies to show solid balconies for Stage II Final Design Review. (Sheet A4-1)

4.2.15 Architectural Elements: Fenestration
The Project provides a variety of window sizes, including sliding doors at the balconies, small square awning windows, narrow rectangular fixed windows, and larger casement windows with a fixed lower transom at the bedrooms. The variety of window sizes along the different façades create visual complexity and help improve the façade modulations, and scale of the building. The window designs avoid large expanses of glazing, and differentiation is provided at the base and the top of the windows for the residential units.

The Design Review Board recommended that the applicant restudy the window placements on the north façade to minimize potential line of sight privacy concerns. The plan shows that the window study was prepared as recommended by the Design Review Board (Exhibit 1, Sheet A2-2). However, the proposed plans do not show any modifications to the north building façade regarding window placements.

4.2.16 Architectural Elements: Fences, Walls and Gates
Stage II Final Design Review drawings do not propose any ground-floor fences, walls, and gates. At the ground-floor private courtyard, security fencing and gates may be necessary to separate the area from the adjacent publicly accessible open space courtyard. If such walls or fences are proposed in the future, staff will review to ensure compliance with Zoning Code and DSP requirements. 244 of 379
12 10a

4.2.17 Architectural Elements: Planters
The landscape plan primarily shows a combination of at-grade landscaping and planters as part of the design. A maximum of 25% of the Project landscaping in the publicly accessible courtyard may be provided in planters to avoid barriers at the ground floor that privatize public open space. Planters that are at the ground level shall not exceed a height of 18 inches within the first ten feet of the streetfacing property line.

4.2.20 Architectural Elements: Garage Entries
The Project features 69 parking spaces in two levels of subterranean parking.

Vehicular access is proposed from a driveway located at the existing rear alley.

This alley is L-shaped and can be accessed from Harvard Street to the south, and Jackson Street to the east. The location of the parking garage entry is complies with the DSP objective design standards.

4.2.21 Architectural Elements: Utilities
The electrical transformer room is proposed within the main body of the building at the rear and adjacent to the alley. The DSP requires that the electrical transformer rooms be located so that access is taken from the alley where feasible or screened and incorporated into the building to provide the visual appearance of a storefront. All utilities will be required to comply with the standards outlined in this section.

4.2.22 Architectural Elements: Lighting
Per GMC §30.30.040, all exterior lighting shall be directed onto the driveways, walkways and parking areas within the development and away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way.

The Design Review Board recommended that the Project minimizes excessive amount of outdoor lighting to reduce glare. Elevation drawings were submitted for Stage II Final Design Review (Exhibit 1, Sheets A4-0, A4-1, A4-2, A4-3) which showed vertical lighting fixtures locations at the balconies and ground floor main entry doors to the building. The lighting fixture design sample (matt bronze up/down accent) is shown on the material board (Exhibit 1,Sheet A6.3). The LED recessed balcony lighting fixture is proposed to be removed to minimize glare.

4.2.23 Architectural Elements: Signage
245 of 379
13 10a
This section of the DSP outlines standards related to signage to enhance the pedestrian experiences along commercial streetscapes. Due to the multi-family nature of the proposal, a sign program is not required for the Project. According to DSP requirements, publicly open space area requires an identification sign as public amenity with hours of accessibility posted on the sign. Additionally, signs are regulated by the Zoning Code, and all signs will be required to comply with Chapter 30.33 of the Glendale Municipal Code.

Stage II Final Design Review application does not propose any signage for the project.

THE PEDESTRIAN REALM – DSP Chapter 4.3 Urban Design
The Project site has frontage on South Kenwood Street which is designated as a “Residential Street”. Improvements will include widened sidewalks to comply with the setback requirements in Section 4.1.3, new sidewalk paving and parkway improvements that encourage live plant material and street-trees.

4.3.4 Residential Street
Kenwood Street is identified as a Residential Street, where landscaped setbacks from the sidewalk are required. This section of the DSP outlines specific standards the Project will have to comply with as it relates to the ground floor and the public right-of-way. The Project will have to comply with the following standards:
• All parkways shall be 4 feet wide from face of curb.
• Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 6 feet wide with no overlapping use by urban amenities such as café seating, trash receptacles and signage. • The building adjacent zone shall be an average of 5 feet in depth and shall be used primarily for residential stoops and entries. The balance shall be used for landscaping or commercial uses if permitted.
• All landscaped areas shall contain a combination of low, medium, and tall plant materials appropriate for an interesting and effective landscape. • The minimum ground floor building frontage height shall be 10 feet for at grade residential entries and 13 feet for raised residential entries. A maximum height of 16 feet is allowed.
• Residential stoops and entries shall follow the standards established in Section 4.2.11.
246 of 379
14 10a
• Commercial uses on residential streets are acceptable, meeting the standards established in Section 4.2.9.

Stage II Final Design Review complies with the above DSP required standards.

Parkway design details are provided with Stage II Final Design Review application as part of the project’s landscape plan. (Exhibit 1, Sheet L-1) OPEN SPACE – DSP Chapter 5

5.3.1, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 Open Space Requirements
For developments that are 100% residential and have an FAR greater than 3.0, the DSP requires 20% of the gross site area to be open space, with 10% of the gross site area to be dedicated as publicly accessible open space (50% of required open space). An additional 140 SF of residential open space is required per residential unit (can be provided as publicly accessible open space, common open space or private open space).

DSP Standards Project Design
Open Space for Project > 3.0
FAR
20% x 14,988 SF =
2,997.6 SF min. 5,095 SF
Publicly Accessible Open Space
(50% of required open space)
50% x 2,997.6 SF =
1,498.8 SF min. 1,500 SF
Residential Open Space
(140 SF per residential unit)
140 x 40 units =
5,600 SF min. 6,435 SF
The Stage II Final Design Review application includes a landscape plan that shows the programming of the publicly accessible courtyard adjacent to Kenwood Street, as well as the common open space areas. The landscape plan includes seating areas and a water feature in the public open space area.

As detailed in the chart above, the entire 14,988 SF Project site provides a total of 1,500 SF of publicly accessible open space in the form of a ground-floor courtyard adjacent to the sidewalk at the southwest corner of the property.

The Project provides a total of 6,435 SF of residential open space on the site. Of this amount, 2,840 square feet consist of private open space provided in the form of individual balconies for all 40 of the residential units. The remaining open 247 of 379
15 10a
space is provided as common open space which includes a 1,056 square foot private courtyard at the ground floor adjacent to the publicly accessible open space, 1,016 square feet of private open space located to the north side of the property, and a 1,523 square foot sun deck on the fifth floor.

5.4.1 Publicly Accessible Open Space - Courtyards & Plazas In accordance with City Council direction on July 30, 2024, the project’s publicly accessible open space has been relocated to the southwest portion of the site with direct access from the public sidewalk. The courtyard comprises approximately is 1,500 SF in area and transitions to the private courtyard proposed on a raised platform. The courtyard is designed to promote a variety of opportunities for social interaction and community activities, enhance public realm and contribute to the overall livability of the downtown. The programming of this space complies with the DSP requirements and includes the following:
• Open to the sky;
• Fully accessible on one or two sides;
• Located at the sidewalk level;
• Include a special feature such as public art, a water feature or specimen tree;
• Include large canopy trees (1 tree per 600 SF minimum); • Provide landscaping primarily at grade (minimum 25% of open space with maximum 25% in raised planters);
• Feature pedestrian scaled lighting, signage and wayfinding, seating, waste receptacles, etc.

5.5 Residential Development Open Space.

The Project provides a total of 6,435 SF of residential open space which includes 2,840 square feet of private open space and 3,595 SF of common outdoor space. The private open space is provided through individual balconies for all 40 units. The common outdoor space is located in a 1,016 square foot private courtyard at the ground level to the north, 1,056 square feet of private courtyard at the ground level to the south and a 1,523 square feet of sun deck on the fifthfloor. The landscape plan submitted with the Stage II application details the programming for these spaces, which includes outdoor seating areas and a water feature.

5.6 Public Art Program
248 of 379
16 10a
Development in the DSP is required to include on-site public art, equal to 2% of project value, subject to review by the Arts & Culture Commission and approval by the City Council. Alternatively, this requirement may be met by paying an amount equivalent to 1% of project value to the City’s Urban Art Fund. The applicant is proposing to pay the in-lieu fee to meet this requirement.

MOBILITY – DSP Chapter 6 Mobility
The DSP designates this portion of South Kenwood Street as a Pedestrian Priority Street which gives first priority to creating excellent conditions for pedestrians. This designation is usually most important on primary retail and transit corridors, but also desirable on many residential streets. Typically, this means wide sidewalks, fine streetscapes, curb parking to buffer pedestrians from passing traffic, and frequent safe crossings. This designation is usually most important on primary retail and transit corridors such as Central Avenue and Colorado Street and are also desirable on residential streets. Consistent with this designation, the building’s pedestrian entrances are located along Kenwood Street and vehicular access is located on the rear alley.

Balancing the needs of different modes of transportation as they compete for limited space is crucial, and the DSP calls for a rational, practical method of compromise whereby the net gain for the community can be maximized while the net impact on different modes and context can be minimized.

COMMUNITY BENEFITS – DSP Chapter 7
The residential Project is utilizing the “Community Benefit for Certain Uses” Incentive as permitted by Section 7.2 of the DSP for an affordable housing project which also defines the baseline residential density as 90 dwelling units per acre. According to the baseline figure in the DSP Section 7.2, the base density for the 0.34-acre site would be 31 units.

The Project is eligible for a 50% density bonus, which would allow their maximum density to increase to 47 units. The Project is proposing only 40 units, which will only require restricting 9% of the units to very low-income households. The Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan (Case No. PDBP-004226-2024) was approved with conditions on April 16, 2025.
249 of 379
16 10a
250 of 379
17 10a

SUMMARY COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATION
Design Review Board Advisory Comments & Recommendations On August 28, 2025, the project was reviewed by Design Review Board (DRB) as an advisory body, in accordance with Code Section 30.47.070 (E) review procedures. The DRB proposed five recommendations (Exhibit 4). The recommendations were as follows:

1. Evenly distribute the project’s open space between the northern and southern interior yards to balance open space on both sides of the building.

2. Minimize excessive amount of lighting to reduce glare.

3. Re-study window placements on the north façade to minimize potential line of sight privacy concerns.

4. Redesign the balconies on the north elevation to have solid or obscure glass instead of open metal railing to obscure the project’s private outdoor spaces.

5. Provide screening for the air conditioning units located on the roof of the building to minimize visual impact of mechanical equipment from adjacent building’s upper floor levels.

Following review by the Design Review Board (serving in an advisory capacity), the project was further refined to address the Board’s design recommendations as shown on the Stage II Final Design Review submittal.

1. The LED recessed balcony lighting fixtures were removed to minimize glare. The lighting fixtures mounted on the balcony walls will remain as shown on the building elevations (Exhibit 1, Sheets A4-0, A4-1, A4-2, A4- 3). The lighting fixture design sample (matt bronze up/down accent) is shown on the material board (Exhibit 1, Sheet A6.3)..

3. Rooftop screening were included within revised plans obscuring the rooftop air conditioning units with 50-inch-high metal panels to minimize visual impact from adjacent six-story multifamily residential building as shown on the roof plan (Exhibit 1, Sheet A3-6).

4. The proposed project site plan has not been modified for open space as recommended by the Design Review Board because the project is 251 of 379
18 10a
consistent with the Administrative Exemption (Case No. PAE-003846-2024) approval which provides open space to the north and to the south of the building.

The Stage II Final Design Review submittal demonstrates that the proposed multi-family residential project is consistent with the design standards, policies and intent of the Downtown Specific Plan. In response to City Council direction provided on July 30, 2024, the project site plan was redesigned to relocate the ground-level open space to the southwest corner of the property while retaining a portion of the ground-level open space to the north side of the site adjacent to the existing six-story residential building.

Based on staff’s analysis for the project plans, staff recommends that City Council approve the Stage II Final Design Review.

NO NET LOSS LAW (SB 166)
California's SB 166, codified as Government Code Section 65863, mandates that local governments (cities and counties) cannot reduce the density of housing sites or approve projects with lower densities than planned for in their Housing Element unless they identify new sites or make specific findings that the remaining sites can still accommodate the jurisdiction's Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA).

State law requires jurisdictions to ensure that sufficient adequate site capacity is available to accommodate the remaining RHNA by income category. This requires a careful accounting of development on the sites identified in the Housing Element and residential projects throughout the jurisdiction.

The Project site includes two parcels (APNs: 5642-007-038 and 5642-007-040) which both are listed in the Housing Element Sites Inventory with a cumulative unit capacity assumption of 28 above moderate-income units combined (28 total capacity).

The Project provides a total of 3 very low income and 37 above moderate units. The overall Project results in a net increase of three lower income and nine above moderateincome unit capacity and total unit capacity. The Project also results in a net increase of 12 total units.

Table 1.1: Sites Inventory Capacity Assumptions
Address APN
Lower
Income
Capacity
Moderate
Income
Capacity
Above
Moderate
Capacity
Total
Capacity
126 S Kenwood 5642-007-
038 - - 14 14
252 of 379
19 10a
128 S Kenwood 5642-007-
040 - - 14 14
Total Assumed Site Capacity - - 28 28
The Project proposes more than the affordability assumptions for above moderateincome and lower income unit capacity. There is a net increase of nine above moderate-income units and three lower income units.

Table 1.2: Remaining Sites Inventory Capacity
Lower
Income
Capacity
Moderate
Income
Capacity
Above
Moderate
Capacity
Total
Capacity
Total Proposed Site
Capacity 3 - 37 40
Total Sites Inventory
Capacity - - 28 28
Capacity Surplus
(+)/Deficit (-) +3 - +9 +12

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The Code requires publication of public notices when the Council considers approval of entitlements such as design review. Staff has published all required notices and has mailed copies of the notices to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the Project. A public notice has also been posted on-site.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The proposed multi-family residential project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 32 "In-fill Development Projects" exemption, pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines because after review and consideration of all required technical reports and/or studies, staff determined the Project meets all the conditions for an infill development project (Exhibit 2), as follows:

1. The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations;
253 of 379
20 10a

2. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban areas;

3. The Project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species;

4. Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and

5. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 3, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council may elect to approve Stage II Final Design Application (Design Review Case No. PDR-002684-2023) with conditions; Alternative 2: The City Council may elect to deny the Project Design Review Application .

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Prepared by:

Shoghig Yepremian, Planner
Reviewed by:

Dennis Joe, Principal Planner
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Stage II Final Design Review Architectural Drawings Exhibit 2: Environmental Review-CEQA Determination
Exhibit 3: Campaign Finance Disclosure
Exhibit 4: Stage II Design Review Board (Advisory) Decision letter dated August 28, 2025.

Exhibit 5: Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Approval Decision letter dated April 16, 2025.
254 of 379
21 10a
Exhibit 6: Administrative Exception Approval Decision letter, dated December 16, 2024.

Exhibit 7: Stage I Preliminary Design Review City Council Packet, July 30, 2024. https://glendaleca.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=3754

0. Exhibit 8: Stage I Preliminary Design Review City Council Motion, July 30, 2024.

Exhibit 9: Interdepartmental Comments
Exhibit 10: Location Map
Exhibit 11: Photographs
255 of 379
MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____________, seconded by Council Member __________, that upon review and consideration of all materials and exhibits relative to Stage II Final Design Review submittal for a proposed new 40-unit, 5-story multi-family development with parking and a public open space area in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) East Broadway District, to be located at 126-128 S. Kenwood Street, Glendale, California (Case No. PDR-002684-2023) (the “Design Review Case”), and after having conducted a public hearing on December 16, 2025, pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, and after having reviewed the materials, and receiving testimony, the Council of the City of Glendale, California, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby APPROVE the Design Review Case based on all of the findings and conclusions contained in the December 16, 2025 Staff Report from the Director of Community Development, and subject to Council comments thereon.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
256 of 379
MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded by
Council Member that upon review and consideration of
all documents, materials and exhibits relative to Stage II Final Design Review submittal for a proposed new 40-unit, 5-story multi-family development with parking and a public open space area in the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) East Broadway District, to be located at 126-128 S. Kenwood Street, Glendale, California (Case No. PDR-002684- 2023) (“Design Review Case”), and after having conducted a public hearing on December 16, 2025, pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, and after having reviewed the materials, and receiving testimony, the Council of the City of Glendale, California, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby continue this matter for three weeks until the January 6, 2026 City Council meeting, without further public notice, and directs the City Attorney to prepare written findings in support of DENYING the Design Review Case.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
257 of 379

KENWOOD

GARDENS
Glendale, California
DECEMBER 2023
CC_12162025_Exhibit 1- Stage II Final Design Review Architectural Drawings 258 of 379
259 of 379
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-1

BUILDING
DATA 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG

12. 13. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED

15. BUILDING DATA

BUILDING DATA BUILDING DATA
Area Schedule (FAR)
Name AREA
1ST FLOOR 8,769 SF
2ND FLOOR 9,666 SF
3RD FLOOR 9,666 SF
4TH FLOOR 9,588 SF
5TH FLOOR 8,294 SF
TOTAL 45,983 SF

UNIT MIX/ PER FLOOR
OPEN SPACE CALC.

NAME Area Level Comments
BALCONY 2,838 SF <varies> PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
OPEN SPACE #1 1,500 SF 1ST FLOOR

PUBLICLY

ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE
OPEN SPACE #2 1,056 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #3 1,016 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #4 1,523 SF 5TH FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
TOTAL OPEN SPACE 7,932 SF

KENWOOD APARTMENT

BUILDING DATA
5- STORY BUILDING WITH 2-LEVELS OF SUBTERRANEAN GARAGE
40-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
126 S. KENWOOD STREET,
GLENDALE, CA 91205

14. TOTAL UNIT MIX
5-STORY TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION OVER 2 LEVELS

OF SUBTERRANEAN PARKING GARAGE , TYPE I-A
- THIS BUILDING AND GARAGE MUST BE EQUIPPED

WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM,
COMPLYING WITH NFPA 13, THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM

SHALL BE APPROVED BY PLUMBING DIVISION PRIOR
TO INSTALLATION".(903.2.8)
- THIS BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MANUAL

ALARM SYSTEM WITH THE CAPABILITY TO SUPPORT

VISIBLE ALARM NOTIFICATIONS APPLIANCES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 72 & CFC 907.
- THIS BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH TWO WAY

RADIO COMMUNICATION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS
PER CFC 510.1
THIS PROJECT IS 100% PRIVATELY FUNDED
TABLE 601

FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS (HOURS)

BUILDING ELEMENT
TYPE I
A B
PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME (SEE SECTION 202) f
3 2 a,b a,b

BEARING WALLS

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR
3 2
3 2 a a
NON BEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS, EXTERIOR SEE TABLE 602 NON BEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS, INTERIOR 0 0 d

FLOOR CONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATED
SECONDARY MEMBERS (SEE SECTION 202) 2 2

ROOF CONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATED
SECONDARY MEMBERS (SEE SECTION 202) 1 1/2 1 b b,c

BUILDING CODE SUPERSEDE PLANS

16. BUILDING CODE 17.

TABLE 705.5

FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS BASED ON

FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE

OCCUPANCY GROUP
A,B, R-2, S-2,
a,b,g
Structural elements and exteior walls fire rating

FIRE SEPARATION
DISTANCE= X (feet)

TYPE OF

CONSTRUCTION
i
IA
IB
X < 5
5< X <10 -
10< X <30 -
X >30 -
IA, IB
IA, IB
IA, IB
1 1
1 1
c
0 < UNLIMITED
TYPE OF STALL P2 P1
STAND. UNOBSTRUCTED
TOTAL
23 22 45
TOTAL PROVIDED 35 34 69

PROVIDED
c. Open parking garages comply with section 406 shall not be required to have a fire-resistance rating.

STAND. TANDEM/OBSTRUCTED 12 12 24
ARCHITECT :

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY SUITE A
MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292

PROJECT TEAM
TEL: (310) 301-1810
CONTACT:-
EMAIL: -
DEVELOPER :

VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD. SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
CONTACT: ARMEN UGURYAN, RODNEY KHAN
EMAIL: [email protected], [email protected]
SURVEYOR:

LAWRENCE J. SCHMAHL
11209 HOWARD ST.

WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90606
CONTACT: LAWRENCE J. SCHMAHL
TEL: (562) 908-0570
EMAIL: -

BUILDING DATA

3. ZONING : DSP / EAST BROADWAY

ALLOWABLE
BUILDING HEIGHT:

SETBACKS AT
KENWOOD ST.
(Residential)
15' MIN. ( 6'
WALKWAY + 4'
PARKWAY + 5 '

BUILDING ADJACENT

ZONE) FROM
STREET CURB, @
GROUND FLR 10'
MIN. ( 6' WALKWAY +
4' PARKWAY) @

LEVELS ABOVE

GROUND FLOOR

REQUIRED PROPOSED
65'-0"
-
65' MAX.

PROJECT ADDRESS
126 S.KENWOOD ST, GLENDALE, CA 91205

1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APN: 5642-007-038 , 5642-007-040
LOT: 14, 16
BLOCK: 23

2. SEPARATE PERMITS

GRADING

SHORING

DEMOLITION

PLUMBING

ELECTRICAL

CAL-OSHA

MECHANICAL
LAND AREA:

LAND AREA: 14,988.00 S/F
NO DEDICATION (SEE SITE PLAN SHEET A2-0)

4. FAR REQUIRED:
2 X LAND AREA

5. 2 X 14,988 = 29,976 S/F

6. DENSITY:
90 UNIT PER ACRE ALLOWED
14,988/ 43,560 = 0.344 X 90 = 31 UNITS MAX
50% INCREASE PER STATE DENSITY BONUS
31 X 50% = 15.5 = 16 UNITS INCREASE
TOTAL ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF UNITS= 47

8. FAR PROVIDED

9. CAR PARKING

10. BICYCLE PARKING

LONG TERM

REQUIRED PROVIDED LOCATION
1 SPACE PER TWENTY (20)
UNITS PER TABLE 30.32-F
40 X 0.1 = 4

SHORT TERM
TOTAL REQUIRED = 6
4 P1
2 1-FLR
TOTAL PRVDED = 7
TOTAL REQUIRED:

SITE AREA = 14,988.00 S/F
SITE AREA POST DEDICATION = XX.00 S/F
14,988 S/F X 20% = 2,997.6 S/F TOTAL REQUIRED

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE
50% OF TOTAL REQUIRED
2,997.6 S/F X 50% = 1,498.8 S/F TOTAL

REQUIRED TO BE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

MINIMUM CONTIGUOUS OPEN SPACE
85% OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO BE PUBLICLY

ACCESSIBLE
1,498.80 S/F X 85% = 1,274.00 S/F TOTAL
MIN. REQUIRED TO BE CONTIGUOUS
20% OF OVERALL SITE
MINIMUM 140 S/F OF OPEN SPACE FOR EACH RESIDNETIAL UNIT 140 X 40 ( NUMBER OF UNITS) = 5,600 S/F MINIMUM

REQUIRED
DEDICATION (SEE SITE PLAN SHEET A2-1)

OPEN SPACE REQUIRED
1ST FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit # # of BD RM Area
101 1-BD 603 SF
102 1-BD 884 SF
103 1-BD 803 SF
104 2-BD 1,072 SF
105 2-BD 1,072 SF
106 1-BD 652 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT : 6
4TH FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit # # of BD RM Area
401 1-BD 627 SF
402 1-BD 860 SF
403 2-BD 941 SF
404 2-BD 958 SF
405 2-BD 911 SF
406 2-BD 976 SF
407 2-BD 1,072 SF
408 2-BD 1,072 SF
409 1-BD 652 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 9
5TH FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit # # of BD RM Area
501 1-BD 860 SF
502 2-BD 941 SF
503 2-BD 958 SF
504 2-BD 911 SF
505 2-BD 976 SF
506 2-BD 1,072 SF
507 2-BD 1,072 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 7
TOTAL 40 UNITS

PROVIDED UNIT
1-BD
1ST FLR.
2ND FLR.

TOTAL
10 3RD FLR.
2-BD
30 5TH FLR.
2 7 9
4 2 6
9 9
7 2 7
2 7
- 7
4TH FLR.

DENSITY BONUS PARKING REQUIREMENT:
1 SPACE / 1 BEDROOM

1.5 SPACE / 2 OR 3 BEDROOMS
14 (1BD) x 1= 14
26 (2, 3 BD) x 1.5 = 39
TOTAL REQ: 39 + 14 = 53
- PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE SHALL HAVE
A MINIMUM AREA OF 1,200 S/F AND A MINIMMUM
DIMENSION OF 30 FEET BY 40 FEET

FAR REQUIRED, PER DSP ZONING CODE

FAR REQUIRED, PER STATE DENSITY BONUS

NO MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA IS REQUIRED
2ND FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit Number Number of BD RM Area
201 1-BD 704 SF
202 2-BD 861 SF
203 2-BD 943 SF
204 2-BD 958 SF
205 2-BD 911 SF
206 2-BD 976 SF
207 2-BD 1,071 SF
208 2-BD 1,071 SF
209 1-BD 652 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 9
- ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTION TO REDUCE THE

WIDTH OF PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE
BY 20% FROM 30'-0" TO 24'-0"
PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE:
24'-0" x 62'-6" = 1500 S.F.

11. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
3RD FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit Number Number of BD RM Area
301 1-BD 704 SF
302 1-BD 861 SF
303 2-BD 943 SF
304 2-BD 958 SF
305 2-BD 911 SF
306 2-BD 976 SF
307 2-BD 1,071 SF
308 2-BD 1,071 SF
309 1-BD 652 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 9
KENWOOD ST.

ALLEY
C L
C L
N89°16'06"E 149.90'
149.87'
N89°15'58"E 149.88'
N0°11'55"W
N0°12'44"W
149.99'
UP
DN UP
C L
(el. +544.51)
(el. +547.87) (el. +549.70)
(el. +545.63) 4 ' P A R K W A Y , P E R D S P ZONE 6 ' W A L K W A Y , P E R D S P ZONE 5 ' B U I L D I N G A D J A C E N T ZONE

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
PL.
10' - 0"
PL.

PL.

PL.
30' - 0"
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

STAIR #3

C O R R I D O R

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL AND BACK UP BATTERY

EXIT PASSAGE WAY

MAIL BOX

STORAGE

LEASING
LIFT
TRASH RM.

TRANSFORMER

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
(OPEN TO SKY)
MIN.
1,500 S/F
24' - 0"
+545' - 0"

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
1,056 S/F
PL.

STAIR #2
RAMP DN TO P1 GARAGE
PL.
+548' - 0"
+548' - 0"
+545' - 0"
27' - 2"
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:
1,016 S.F.

PROPERTY
100' - 0"

PROPERTY
149' - 11"
7"

BUILDING
94' - 3" 5' - 1"

DRIVEWAY
18' - 0"

BUILDING
146' - 9"
146' - 3"

PROPERTY
149' - 10 1/2"
3' - 3" 4 1/2"
11' - 0" 65' - 0"
ADJACENT 6-STORY BUILDING

ADJACENT BUILDING
"HISTORIC"
29' - 6"
15' - 9"
26' - 4"
8' - 10"
62' - 6" 44' - 0"
ST.
42' - 9"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A2-0
SITE PLAN 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"

SITE PLAN
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-3
AERIAL VIEW 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-4
AERIAL VIEW 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-5
AERIAL VIEW 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-6
AERIAL VIEW 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-7
AERIAL VIEW 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-8
AERIAL VIEW 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG

SHADOWCAST DIAGRAM
268 of 379
VEHICULAR ACCESS:
269 of 379
ALLEY STUDY:
270 of 379
GREEN BUILDING:
• Electric vehicle (EV) charging (New Construction with 20 Dwelling Units or More.) 4.106.4.3.2 (GBRC) - Fifty percent (50%) of dwelling units: 20 units Level 2 EV Ready. - An additional fifteen percent (15%) of dwelling units: 6 units Level 2 Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces. - An additional 10% of dwelling units: 4 units Level 2 EV Capable. • ALL-ELECTRIC BUILDING” 4.106.5 (GBRC): No combustion equipment (no gas appliances/equipment) on site. • Water permeable surface. 4.106.5 (GBSC): Minimum 20 percent of the total on-grade, residential uncovered parking, walking or patio surfaces - Total on grade area (1st level): 4,345 SF
- Permeable area (1st level): 1,468 SF / 4,345 SF = 33% > 20% • Finish material pollutant control. (4.504.2) Finish material pollutant control:
- Adhesives, sealants and caulks used on this project shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1168 for VOC limits and toxic compounds. Aerosol adhesives, sealants and caulks (in packaging units not more than one pound or 16 fluid ounces) shall comply with statewide VOC standards. - Paints and coatings shall comply with VOC limits in CalGreen Table 4.504.3. - Aerosol paints and coatings shall comply with statewide requirements and other requirements noted in CalGreen Section 4.504.2.3 - Carpet Systems. All carpeting and carpet cushion shall meet the requirements of the Carpet and Rug Institute Green Label Plus Program.

Adhesives shall comply with VOC limits in CalGreen Table 4.504.1. - Resilient flooring. Where installed, 80% of the floor area receiving resilient flooring shall comply with one or more of the standards listed in CalGreen Section 4.504.4.
- Composite wood products used on the interior or exterior of the building shall comply with the formaldehyde limits in CalGreen Table 4.504.5. • Solar zone (Multifamily buildings): Minimum 15% of roof area - Total roof area: 7,966 SF x 15% = 1,195 SF (MIN.)
- Provided (Solar Ready Area): 20’x60’=1200 SF (ROOF PLAN) 271 of 379
UP
DN UP
DN
UP
DN UP
8,769 SF
1ST FLOOR
9,666 SF
2ND FLOOR
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-16
FAR
CALCULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
1ST FLOOR
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
2ND FLOOR
Area Schedule (FAR)
Name AREA
1ST FLOOR 8,769 SF
2ND FLOOR 9,666 SF
3RD FLOOR 9,666 SF
4TH FLOOR 9,588 SF
5TH FLOOR 8,294 SF
TOTAL 45,983 SF < UNLIMITED
UP
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
9,666 SF
3RD FLOOR
9,588 SF
4TH FLOOR
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-17
FAR
CALCULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
3RD FLOOR
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
4TH FLOOR
Area Schedule (FAR)
Name AREA
1ST FLOOR 8,769 SF
2ND FLOOR 9,666 SF
3RD FLOOR 9,666 SF
4TH FLOOR 9,588 SF
5TH FLOOR 8,294 SF
TOTAL 45,983 SF < UNLIMITED
UP
DN
DN
8,294 SF
5TH FLOOR
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-18
FAR
CALCULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
5TH FLOOR
Area Schedule (FAR)
Name AREA
1ST FLOOR 8,769 SF
2ND FLOOR 9,666 SF
3RD FLOOR 9,666 SF
4TH FLOOR 9,588 SF
5TH FLOOR 8,294 SF
TOTAL 45,983 SF < UNLIMITED
UP
DN UP
DN
UP
DN UP
1,500 SF
OPEN SPACE #1
1,056 SF
OPEN SPACE #2
72 SF

BALCONY
77 SF

BALCONY
72 SF

BALCONY
64 SF

BALCONY
61 SF

BALCONY
MIN.
24' - 0"
62' - 6"
72 SF

BALCONY
44' - 0"
1,016 SF
OPEN SPACE #3
64 SF

BALCONY
72 SF

BALCONY
80 SF

BALCONY
71 SF

BALCONY
50 SF

BALCONY
77 SF

BALCONY
98 SF

BALCONY
50 SF

BALCONY
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-19

OPEN SPACE
CALCULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
1ST FLOOR
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
2ND FLOOR
OPEN SPACE CALC.

NAME Area Level Comments
BALCONY 2,838 SF <varies> PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
OPEN SPACE #1 1,500 SF 1ST FLOOR

PUBLICLY

ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE
OPEN SPACE #2 1,056 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #3 1,016 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #4 1,523 SF 5TH FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
TOTAL OPEN SPACE 7,932 SF
Open accessible Space located directly accessible and adjacent to the R.O.W. sidewalk at S Kenwood St. and comlies with the following standards:

DSP 5.3.4:
- Not used or accessed for vehicles.
- Not occupied by garage ventilation circulation paths account for less than 10% of overall area.
- No private dining included.
- Open to sky, no building over hangs, only canopies/ awnings.

DSP 5.4.1
- Min dimensions: 30 ft x 40 ft
- Adjacent to public sidewalk 1 side
- Not-obstructed access from the sidewalk.
- Raised planters at the perimeter only
- Open and accessible to the public 7am to 10pm.
- Signage shall identify the hours of accessibility per Section 7.2.4(E). - Vehicular access, loading and parking uses prohibited.

DSP 4.2.17
- Planters within first 10 ft less than 18 inches in height. - Integrated min 12" seating in planters.
- Planter boxes less than 25% of landscaping.

DSP 4.1.4
- 100% Open to sky.
- Oriented to S. Kenwood St.
- Publicly accessibly to S. Kenwood St.

OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT:

TOTAL REQUIRED: 140 x 40 = 5,600 S.F.

PROPOSED: 7,801 S.F. (SEE TABLE BELOW
PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE: (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS)
SITE AREA: 14,988 S.F.

OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT (20% OF SITE AREA AFTER DEDICATION) 14,988 x 20% = 2,992.6 S.F. REQUIRED
PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (50% OF TOTAL REQUIRED):
2,997.6 x 50%= 1,498.8 S.F.

PROPOSED: 1,500 S.F.

MINIMUM CONTIGUOUS OPEN SPACE 85%:
1,498.8 x 85%= 1,274 S.F.

PROPOSED: 1,056 S.F.

UP
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
77 SF

BALCONY
91 SF

BALCONY
80 SF

BALCONY
71 SF

BALCONY
72 SF

BALCONY
64 SF

BALCONY
50 SF

BALCONY
77 SF

BALCONY
153 SF

BALCONY
64 SF

BALCONY
72 SF

BALCONY
80 SF

BALCONY
71 SF

BALCONY
50 SF

BALCONY
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-20

OPEN SPACE
CALCULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
3RD FLOOR
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
4TH FLOOR
OPEN SPACE CALC.

NAME Area Level Comments
BALCONY 2,838 SF <varies> PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
OPEN SPACE #1 1,500 SF 1ST FLOOR

PUBLICLY

ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE
OPEN SPACE #2 1,056 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #3 1,016 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #4 1,523 SF 5TH FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
TOTAL OPEN SPACE 7,932 SF
UP
DN
DN
1,523 SF
OPEN SPACE #4
77 SF
BALCONY 72 SF

BALCONY
72 SF

BALCONY
80 SF

BALCONY
71 SF

BALCONY
50 SF

BALCONY
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-21

OPEN SPACE
CALCULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/32" = 1'-0"
5TH FLOOR
OPEN SPACE CALC.

NAME Area Level Comments
BALCONY 2,838 SF <varies> PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
OPEN SPACE #1 1,500 SF 1ST FLOOR

PUBLICLY

ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE
OPEN SPACE #2 1,056 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #3 1,016 SF 1ST FLOOR
OPEN SPACE #4 1,523 SF 5TH FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE
TOTAL OPEN SPACE 7,932 SF
278 of 379
DN
UP

PRIVACY WALL

BALCONY BALCONY
BALCONY BALCONY 29' - 5"
26' - 2"

PRIVACY WALL
WIN. WIN.

WIN.

BATH.

WIN.

DOOR DOOR
WIN. WIN. BATH.

WIN. WIN.

WIN.
21' - 0"
16' - 0"
14' - 0"
ADJACENT 6-STORY BUILDING
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:
1,016 SF

BALCONY
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A2-2

SITE PLAN
EXHIBIT-NORTH 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
3/16" = 1'-0"

SITE PLAN EXHIBIT-NORTH

ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN
N.T.S.
280 of 379
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-13

PEDESTRIAN
REALM40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG

4.3.4 RESIDENTIAL STREET
Residential streets are located in the East Broadway District, where landscaped setbacks from the sidewalk are required. This area builds upon the mixed-use, moderate to high-density of this area with newer mixeduse projects featuring upper level housing and retail, services, office, live/work and/or residential along the ground floor. This area includes a number of civic and cultural uses and historic buildings, which have their own unique frontages.

4.3 PEDESTRIAN REALM

4.3.4 RESIDENTIAL STREET

PEDESTRIAN SCALED
LIGHTING. REFER TO
LANDSCAPE PLAN.

STREET LANDSCAPING AND TREES:

COMBINATION OF LOW, MEDIUM AND

TALL PLANT AS SPECIFIED BY THE
CITY. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN.

PLANTED 4 FEET WIDE

PARKWAY FROM THE FACE OF
THE CURB.
13 FEET BUILDING FRONTAGE FOR THE
RAISED RESIDENTIAL ENTRY.
5 FEET BUILDING ADJACENT ZONE

USED FOR BUILDING ENTRY AND
LANDSCAPING.
6 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK: PAVING

PATTERN AND MATERIAL AS
SPECIFIED BY THE CITY.
282 of 379
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT
65' - 0"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-23

BLDG HEIGHT
& FLR AREA
RATIO 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
MAX. BLDG.

HEIGHT PLANE
65'-0" PROPOSED

BUILDING HEIGHT
FIFTH FLOOR: 8,294 S.F. FOURTH FLOOR: 9,588 S.F. THIRD FLOOR: 9,666 S.F.

SECOND FLOOR: 9,666 S.F. FIRST FLOOR: 8,769 S.F. EL. +544.51 EL. +545.63 EL. +547.87 ALLOWED FAR BY RIGHT PER DSP: 2.0: 29,976 S.F. MAX.

REQUESTED FAR PER STATE DENSITIY BONUS: INLIMITED
PROPOSED FAR: 46,384 S.F.
11' - 0"
24' - 0"
15' - 0"
1' - 6"

BUILDING
89' - 11"

BUILDING
146' - 3"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-24

BUILDING
SETBACKS 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG

GROUND FLOOR

OPEN SPACE

REAR SETBACK

FRONT SETBACK

PER DSP SIDE SETBACK
ADJACENT LOT:

DSP/ EB
ADJACENT LOT:

DSP/ EB
24' - 6"
121' - 9"
12' - 0"

BUILDING

BUILDING
146' - 3"
89' - 11"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-25
HEIGHT
MODULATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
MODULATION: ROOFLINE

HEIGHT MODULATION OF
AT LEAST 10 FEET FOR
EVERY 150 LINEAR FEET.

BUILDING
89' - 11"

BUILDING
146' - 3"

MAJOR MODULATION
103' - 8"
42' - 7"
11' - 10"
12' - 9 1/2"
22' - 8"
16' - 10"
11' - 8"
16' - 9"
11' - 2"
5' - 10"
36' - 11"
19' - 0"
65' - 0"
5' - 11"
14' - 8"
20' - 4"
5' - 3"
30' - 0"
13' - 9"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-26
FACADE
MODLATION 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
MAJOR
MODULATION:
24'-11" W x 103'-7" D
MINOR
MODULATION:
14'-4" W x 6'-0" D
MINOR
MODULATION:
14'-4" W x 6'-0" D
MINOR
MODULATION:
16'-10" W x 6'-0" D
MINOR
MODULATION:
12'-10" W x 6'-0" D
MINOR
MODULATION:
13'-9" W x 6'-0" D
MAJOR MODULATION:
19'-0" W x 103'-8" D
MINOR MODULTION:
20'-4" W x 13'-2" D
MINOR MODULATION:12"
MINOR MODULATION:12"
MINOR MODULATION:12" MINOR MODULATION: 24"
BASE
14' - 0" 21' - 0"

MIDDLE TOP
10' - 6"
TOP
22' - 6"
MIDDLE
21' - 0" 11' - 0"
BASE
TOP
24' - 0"
MIDDLE
21' - 0" 11' - 0"
BASE
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A1-27

ARCITECTURAL
ELEMENTS 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG

PROJECTION DEFINES THE BUILDING

ENTRANCE FROM THE BALANCE OF
THE FACADE.

STOREFRINTS - MINIMUM OF 75%
TRANSPARENCY.

HUMAN-SCALED MATERIALS ON

STREET LEVEL FACADE

RECESSED BUILDING ENTRANCE IS

VISIBLE AND CONNECTED ALONG

WITH PUBLIC STREET

HIGH QUALITY METAL

WALL PANELS

MCM ALUMINUM

METAL PANELS

METAL FACIA

STRUCTURAL STYLE RECESSED BALCONIES

BUILDING FACADE USES

ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONS

TO ARTICULATE THE FACADE
FACADE

MODULATION
288 of 379
289 of 379
290 of 379
1 LIGHTING FIXTURE

UP/DOWN ACCENT
SPJ LIGHTING,-SPJ-UD2-16
COLOR.· MATTE BRONZE

B DRYVIT DPR FINISH
TEXTURE· SANDBLAST A
COLOR.· CHARCOAL SMUDGE DE6370

DRYVIT DPR FINISH
TEXTURE· SANDBLAST
COLOR.· MOUNTAIN AIR DE6393
E

MCM ALUMINUM WOOD

LOOK PANELS
COLOR.· WALNUT
G
C
D

METAL FASCIA MCM ALUMINUM
COLOR.· DARK GRAY
1 METAL MCM ALUMINUM
COLOR.· MOUNTAIN AIR DE6393 (OR SIMILAR)

WALL PANEL METALSALES
EMt-1653 (OR SIMILAR) COLOR.· DARK GREY
FASTENERS.·
FINISH.·

CONCEALED

PVDF PAINT SYSTEM
-�

ALUMINUM DOORS AND WINDOWS
H 2" FRAME PROFILE
COLOR.· DARK BRONZE
■
la. (!)
<C 9
C 1-
0;
0�
;: ;
z !::: w�
��
w
WO
l()
0::: N I- '<"""
Cf) 0)
0 <(
ou
os�
z <( wo
�z
c.o w
N _J
'<""" (..9
0 "'
0 "'
1-
::c
I.:)
>
CL
0 u
(Q)
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
REVISIONS:

A6.3
291 of 379
UP
UP
S2
S1
S4S5S8
S3S7
S
31 S
30 S
28 S
10 S
14 S9S
13 S
16 S
20 S
15 S
19 S
22S
21 S
33 S6
S
29 S
12S
11 S
18S
17 S
24S
23 S
32 S
34 S
35 S
27 S
25S
26 A5-0 1
99' - 4"
148' - 4"
A5-1 1

MECHANICAL

STORAGE MACH RM
ELEV. ELEV
LOBBY
RAMP UP TO P1 STORAGE
STAIR #3
18' - 0" 25' - 0" 18' - 0"
9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 10' - 7" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 10' - 7" 9' - 7" STAIR #1
10' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 7"
4' - 6" 9' - 0" 8' - 0" 15' - 3" 22' - 3" 1' - 0" 10' - 0" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 5" 8' - 6"
18' - 0" 4' - 0"
18' - 0"
25' - 0"
8' - 6" 8' - 6" 4' - 1"
9' - 7" 3' - 5"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-0.1
P2- GARAGE
PLAN
40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P2- GARAGE
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
UP DN
UP
S4S2S5S6S8
S3S1S7
S
30 S
29 S
28 S
27 S
10 S
12 S
14 S9S
11 S
13 S
16 S
18 S
20 S
15 S
17 S
19 S
22 S
24 S
21 S
23 DN
S
32 S
31 S
33 S
34 S
26 S
25 A5-0 1
A5-1 1

MECHANICAL
STAIR #3
STAIR #1
ELEV. ELEV.

LOBBY

RESIDENTIAL
(VAN
ACCESS.)

BIKE RM STORAGE
RAMP UP TO 1ST FLOOR RAMP DN. TO P2 25' - 0"
10' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 8' - 6" 4' - 6" 9' - 0" 8' - 0" 7' - 0" 8' - 3" 22' - 3" 1' - 0" 10' - 0" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 4' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 0" 9' - 7" 3' - 5"
4' - 1" 8' - 7"
99' - 4"
148' - 4"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

RBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-0.2
P1- GARAGE
PLAN
40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P1- GARAGE
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
KENWOOD ST.

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
PL.
10' - 0"
PL.

PL.

PL.
30' - 0"
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

BALCONY
STAIR #3

C O R R I D O R

BALCONY

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL AND BACK UP BATTERY

EXIT PASSAGE WAY

MAIL BOX

BALCONY

STORAGE

LEASING
LIFT
TRASH RM.

TRANSFORMER

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
(OPEN TO SKY)
MIN.
1,500 S/F
24' - 0"
+545' - 0"

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
1,056 S/F
PL.

STAIR #2
RAMP DN TO P1 GARAGE
PL.
+548' - 0"
+548' - 0"
+545' - 0"
27' - 2"
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:
1,016 S.F.

PROPERTY
100' - 0"

PROPERTY
149' - 11"
7"

BUILDING
94' - 3" 5' - 1"

DRIVEWAY
18' - 0"

BUILDING
146' - 9"
146' - 3"

PROPERTY
149' - 10 1/2"
3' - 3" 4 1/2"
11' - 0" 65' - 0"
ADJACENT 6-STORY BUILDING

ADJACENT BUILDING
"HISTORIC"
29' - 6"
15' - 9"
26' - 4"
8' - 10"
62' - 6" 44' - 0"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A2-0
SITE PLAN 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"

SITE PLAN
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
UP
DN UP
ALLEY

C L C L
10' - 0"
(el. +544.51)
(el. +547.87) (el. +549.70)
(el. +545.63) 4 ' P A R K W A Y , P E R D S P ZONE 6 ' W A L K W A Y , P E R D S P ZONE A5-0 1

PERFORATED
GATE W/ 50%
MIN. OPENING
30' - 0"
5 ' B U I L D I N G A D J A C E N T ZONE
PL.

PL.

A5-1 1
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

STAIR #3

C O R R I D O R

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL AND BACK UP BATTERY

EXIT PASSAGE WAY

MAIL BOX

STORAGE

LEASING
LIFT
TRASH RM.

TRANSFORMER
652 SF
1-BD
106 1,065 SF
2-BD
105
1,068 SF
2-BD
104
601 SF
1-BD
101
886 SF
1-BD
102
STAIR #2
RAMP DN TO P1 GARAGE

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
(OPEN TO SKY)
1,500 S/F

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
1,056 S/F
803 SF
1-BD
103

BUILDING
146' - 4" UNIT
24' - 11"
UNIT
39' - 7"
UNIT
39' - 2"
UNIT
42' - 8"
4' - 5"

STORAGE
9' - 11"
ELEC. RM.
11' - 6"
TRANS. RM
21' - 11"

PROPERTY
100' - 0"
7"

BUILDING
94' - 3" 5' - 1" DRIVEWAY
18' - 0"

PROPERTY
100' - 0"
11' - 0" 65' - 0" 24' - 0"
+548' - 0"
+545' - 0"
+548' - 0" +545' - 0"
PL.

PL.

PL.
5' - 4"
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:
1,016 S.F.

ST.

STAIR #1

BALCONY
BD RM
#2
BATH
RM
DIN
LIV
CL.

DINLIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
DIN

LIV BD RM
#2 BD RM
#1

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
BD RM
BATH
RM #1

KITCHEN
LIV
DIN

W/D W/D

BALCONY

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
BD RM
#1

KITCHEN
BD RM

WALK-IN
CL
BATH
LIV
DIN

KITCHEN
BATH
RM
LIV
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
CL.

CL.

W/D DIN

WALK-IN
CL
CL.

WALK-IN
CL
CL
W/D

BALCONY
UNIT
29' - 2"
STUDY
RM.

WALK-IN
CL.

MECH.

SHAFT
LV CL.

CL.
31' - 6"
UNIT
35' - 0"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-1

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
1ST FLOOR
1ST FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit # # of BD RM Area
101 1-BD 601 SF
102 1-BD 886 SF
103 1-BD 803 SF
104 2-BD 1,068 SF
105 2-BD 1,065 SF
106 1-BD 652 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT : 6
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
DN
UP
DN
UP
A5-0 1
A5-1 1
651 SF
1-BD
209
861 SF
2-BD
202
940 SF
2-BD
203 966 SF
2-BD
204
914 SF
2-BD
205
975 SF
2-BD
206

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

BALCONY
STAIR #2

C O R R I D O R

B A L C O N Y

KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#1
BATH #1
DIN
LIV
CL

BD RM BATH
W/D
DINLIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
DIN

LIV BD RM
#2 BD RM
#1

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
BD RM
#1
BATH
RM #2
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#2
BATH
RM #1
BATH
RM #1 KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
W/D

BALCONY

W/D W/D

BALCONY

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
BD RM
#1

C O R R I D O R

KITCHEN
BD RM

WALK-IN
CL
BATH
LIV
DIN

KITCHEN
BATH
RM #2
LIV

WALK-IN
CL.

LV CL.

LIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2
BATH
#2
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

BD RM
#1
BD RM
BATH #2
RM #1
CL.

CL.

DIN
LIV

KITCHEN
W/D CL.

TRASH
RM.

BATH
RM

KITCHEN
W/D
DIN

WALK-IN
CL
W/D
703 SF
1-BD
201 WALK-IN
CL.

CL.
1,064 SF
2-BD
208 1,068 SF
2-BD
207
PL.

PL.

BUILDING
146' - 4"

BUILDING
146' - 4"
UNIT
24' - 11"
UNIT
39' - 7"
UNIT
39' - 6"
UNIT
38' - 8"
UNIT
36' - 7"
5' - 1" 89' - 11" 5' - 0"
UNIT
25' - 5"
UNIT
36' - 1"
UNIT
28' - 5"
5' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 0"
UNIT
30' - 0"
24' - 0"

BUILDING
65' - 0" 11' - 0"
2' - 3"
3' - 2" 5"
1' - 4"

W/D DIN
CL.

BALCONY
BATH
RM #2

WALK-IN
CL
CL.

WALK-IN
CL.
42' - 5"
CL
MECH.

SHAFT
CLOSET
UNIT
26' - 7" 9' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 2"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-2
SECOND
FLOOR PLAN 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
2ND FLOOR
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
2ND FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit Number Number of BD RM Area
201 1-BD 703 SF
202 2-BD 861 SF
203 2-BD 940 SF
204 2-BD 966 SF
205 2-BD 914 SF
206 2-BD 975 SF
207 2-BD 1,068 SF
208 2-BD 1,064 SF
209 1-BD 651 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 9
UP
DN
DN
UP
A5-0 1
A5-1 1
861 SF
1-BD
302
940 SF
2-BD
303 966 SF
2-BD
304
914 SF
2-BD
305
1,068 SF
2-BD
307
651 SF
1-BD
309
975 SF
2-BD
306
703 SF
1-BD
301

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

BALCONY
STAIR #2

C O R R I D O R

B A L C O N Y

KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#1
BATH #1
DIN
LIV
CL

BD RM BATH
W/D
DINLIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
DIN

LIV BD RM
#2 BD RM
#1

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
BD RM
#1
BATH
RM #2
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#2
BATH
RM #1
BATH
RM #1 KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
W/D

BALCONY

W/D W/D

BALCONY

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
BD RM
#1

C O R R I D O R

KITCHEN
BD RM

WALK-IN
CL
BATH
LIV
DIN

KITCHEN
BATH
RM #2
LIV

WALK-IN
CL.

LV CL.

LIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2
BATH
#2
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

BD RM
#1
BD RM
BATH #2
RM #1
CL.

CL.

DIN
LIV

KITCHEN
W/D CL.

TRASH
RM.

BATH
RM

KITCHEN
W/D
DIN

WALK-IN
CL
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

CL.
1,064 SF
2-BD
308
PL.

PL.

BUILDING
146' - 4"

BUILDING
146' - 4"
UNIT
24' - 11"
UNIT
39' - 7"
UNIT
39' - 6"
UNIT
25' - 9"
UNIT
49' - 6"

BUILDING
89' - 11" 5' - 0"
UNIT
25' - 5"
UNIT
36' - 1"
UNIT
28' - 5"
5' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
29' - 8"
24' - 0"

BUILDING
65' - 0" 11' - 0"
2' - 3" 1' - 4"
3' - 2" 5"

W/D DIN
CL.

BALCONY
BATH
RM #2

WALK-IN
CL
CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

CL
UNIT
42' - 5"
MECH.

SHAFT
CLOSET
UNIT
26' - 7" 9' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 2"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-3

THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
3RD FLOOR
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
3RD FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit Number Number of BD RM Area
301 1-BD 703 SF
302 1-BD 861 SF
303 2-BD 940 SF
304 2-BD 966 SF
305 2-BD 914 SF
306 2-BD 975 SF
307 2-BD 1,068 SF
308 2-BD 1,064 SF
309 1-BD 651 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 9
UP
DN
DN
A5-0 1
A5-1 1
651 SF
1-BD
409
626 SF
1-BD
401
1,065 SF
2-BD
408
859 SF
1-BD
402
938 SF
2-BD
403
966 SF
2-BD
404
914 SF
2-BD
405
1,068 SF
2-BD
407
975 SF
2-BD
406
PL.

PL.

BUILDING
146' - 4"
24' - 11"
UNIT
39' - 7"
UNIT
39' - 2"
UNIT
42' - 8"
UNIT
25' - 9"
UNIT
49' - 6"

BUILDING
89' - 11" 5' - 0"
UNIT
25' - 5"
UNIT
36' - 1"
UNIT
28' - 5"
UNIT
34' - 8"
UNIT
29' - 8"
3' - 2" 5"
24' - 0"
5' - 1"
6' - 8"
1' - 4"

BUILDING
146' - 4"
5' - 4"
2' - 3"

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

BALCONY
STAIR #2

C O R R I D O R

B A L C O N Y

KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#1
BATH #1
DIN
LIV
CL

BD RM BATH
W/D
DINLIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
DIN

LIV BD RM
#2 BD RM
#1

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
BD RM
#1
BATH
RM #2
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#2
BATH
RM #1
BATH
RM #1 KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
W/D

BALCONY

W/D W/D

BALCONY

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
BD RM
#1

C O R R I D O R

KITCHEN
BD RM

WALK-IN
CL
BATH
LIV
DIN

KITCHEN
BATH
RM #2
LIV

WALK-IN
CL.

LIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2
BATH
#2
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

BD RM
#1
BD RM
BATH #2
RM #1
CL.

CL.

DIN
LIV

KITCHEN
W/D CL.

TRASH
RM
BATH
RM

KITCHEN
CLOSET
DIN
CL
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

CL.

W/D DIN
CL.

BALCONY
BATH
RM #2

WALK-IN
CL
CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

CL
LV CL.

W/D
MECH.

SHAFT
UNIT
22' - 2" 9' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 2"
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-4
FOURTH
FLOOR PLAN 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
4TH FLOOR
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
4TH FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit # # of BD RM Area
401 1-BD 626 SF
402 1-BD 859 SF
403 2-BD 938 SF
404 2-BD 966 SF
405 2-BD 914 SF
406 2-BD 975 SF
407 2-BD 1,068 SF
408 2-BD 1,065 SF
409 1-BD 651 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 9
UP
DN
DN
A5-0 1
A5-1 1

SUN DECK
1,500 S/F
859 SF
1-BD
501
1,065 SF
2-BD
507
1,068 SF
2-BD
506
938 SF
2-BD
502
966 SF
2-BD
503
914 SF
2-BD
504
975 SF
2-BD
505
PL.

PL.

PL.
2' - 4"

BUILDING
146' - 3" 1' - 4"

OPEN SPACE
26' - 9"
STAIR
8' - 8"
UNIT
35' - 7"
UNIT
25' - 9"
UNIT
49' - 6"

BUILDING
146' - 3"
24' - 10"
UNIT
39' - 7"
UNIT
39' - 2"
UNIT
42' - 8"
3' - 3" 5"

BUILDING
65' - 0" 10' - 11" 24' - 0"

BUILDING
89' - 11" 5' - 0"
UNIT
25' - 5"
UNIT
36' - 1"
UNIT
28' - 5"
5' - 1"

C O R R I D O R
STAIR #1
ELEV.

BALCONY
STAIR #2

C O R R I D O R
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#1
BATH #1
DIN
LIV
CL
DINLIV
BD RM
#2
BD RM
#1

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH #1

WALK-IN
CL
DIN

LIV BD RM
#2 BD RM
#1

KITCHEN
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

WALK-IN
CL
BD RM
#1
BATH
RM #1
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2
BATH
RM #2
BATH
RM #1 KITCHEN
LIV
DIN
W/D

BALCONY
CL
W/D W/D .

BALCONY

BALCONY BALCONY
BD RM
#2

C O R R I D O R

KITCHEN
BATH
RM #2
LIV

WALK-IN
CL.

LIV
BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2
BATH
#2
W/D

WALK-IN
CL.

BD RM
#1
BD RM
#2 BATH
RM #1

WALK-IN
CL.

CL.

DIN
LIV

KITCHEN
W/D
BATH
RM #2
TRASH
RM.

BATH
RM

KITCHEN

CLOSET W/D
DIN
CL.

CL.

CL. CL.

WALK-IN
CL
CL.

W/D DIN WALK-IN
CL.

CL.

BALCONY
LV CL.

MECH.

SHAFT
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-5

FIFTH FLOOR
PLAN
40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
0' 4' 8' 16' 32' N
1/8" = 1'-0"
5TH FLOOR
5TH FLOOR UNIT MIX
Unit # # of BD RM Area
501 1-BD 859 SF
502 2-BD 938 SF
503 2-BD 966 SF
504 2-BD 914 SF
505 2-BD 975 SF
506 2-BD 1,068 SF
507 2-BD 1,065 SF
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIT: 7
DN
A5-0 1
A5-1 1

ROOF AREA

LOWER DECK

AC UNITS

ROOF ACCESS
STAIR
24' - 5" 121' - 10"
50" HIGH EQUIPMENT SCREEN

SEE DETAIL BELOW
89' - 11"
36" WIDE GATE
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A3-6
ROOF PLAN 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
ROOF
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
50"
301 of 379
302 of 379
303 of 379
304 of 379
X
O O
X
O

O O X X O O X O O
F.F.
1 6' - 0" 2' - 0"
2 3
1 2 3 A

EQ EQ EQ
12' - 0"

EQ EQ EQ EQ
6' - 0"
3' - 0" 3' - 0"
6' - 0"
EQ EQ
3' - 6"
6' - 0" 2' - 0"
2' - 0"
2' - 0" 6' - 0"
2' - 0"
8' - 0"
HDR.

F.F.
8' - 0"
HDR.
9' - 0"
4 X
3' - 0"
6' - 0" 2' - 0"
X X X
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM RBAN
DESIGN

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A6-0
Window/ Door
Schedule40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
Window Schedule
Type
Mark Width Height Operation Frame Material Comments
1 6' - 0" 6' - 0" CASEMENT/ FIXED ALUMINUM
2 2' - 0" 6' - 0" FIXED ALUMINUM
3 2' - 0" 2' - 0" AWNING ALUMINUM
4 3' - 0" 6' - 0" FIXED ALUMINUM
Door Schedule
Type
Mark Width Height Operation Frame Material Comments
1 9' - 0" 8' - 0" SLIDING ALUM / GLASS
2 12' - 0" 8' - 0" SLIDING ALUM / GLASS
3 6' - 0" 8' - 0" SWING ALUM / GLASS
Storefront
Mark Width Height Operation Frame Material Comments
A 10'-0" 8'-0" FIXED ALUM / GLASS
1ST FLOOR
548.00
2ND FLOOR
559.00
3RD FLOOR
569.50
4TH FLOOR
580.00
5TH FLOOR
590.50
P1- GARAGE
535.50
ROOF
601.50
P2- GARAGE
525.50
PL.
8' - 2"
MIN.
11' - 0" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 11' - 0" 12' - 6" 10' - 0"

U N I T U N I T U N I T

U N I T U N I T

U N I T

U N I T
LOBBY
STAIR#1
STAIR #2
PL.

ROLL-UP
GATE

SUN DECK

HIGHEST POINT
610.00

LOWEST POINT
545.00
8' - 6"
9' - 6" 10' - 0"

U N I T U N I T U N I T

U N I T U N I T U N I T U N I T
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A5-0
SECTION-A 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
1/8" = 1'-0"

SECTION A
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
1ST FLOOR
548.00
2ND FLOOR
559.00
3RD FLOOR
569.50
4TH FLOOR
580.00
5TH FLOOR
590.50
P1- GARAGE
535.50
ROOF
601.50
P2- GARAGE
525.50

HIGHEST POINT
610.00

LOWEST POINT
545.00
11' - 0" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 11' - 0"
8' - 6"
12' - 6" 10' - 0"
STAIR #2 U N I T

U N I T

U N I T
U
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203 KENWOOD APT. 126 KENWOOD STREET GLENDALE, CA 91205 A5-1
SECTION-B 40-UNIT APARTMENT BLDG
1/8" = 1'-0"

SECTION B
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
A6.2 308 of 379
KENWOOD ST. C L PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (OPEN TO SKY) 1,500 S/F UP DN UP ALLEY C L (el. +544.51) (el. +547.87)
(el. +549.70) (el. +545.63)
6 ' W A L K W A Y , P E R D S P ZONE EXIT FROM GARAGE
5 ' B U I L D I N G A D J A C E N T ZONE BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY PL.

PL. PL. LOBBY C O R R I D O R STAIR #1 ELEV.

BALCONY STAIR #3

C O R R I D O R BALCONY STORAGE

ELECTRICAL AND BACK UP BATTERY EXIT PASSAGE WAY
MAIL BOXBALCONY STORAGE LEASING LIFT TRASH RM. TRANSFORMER 637 SF 1-BD 106 1,050 SF 2-BD 105 1,049 SF 2-BD 104 597 SF 1-BD 101 889 SF 1-BD 102 STAIR #2 RAMP DN TO P1 GARAGE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 1,056 S/F 882 SF Room 103 PL.

PL. PL.PL.

PL. DN SUN DECK 1,500 S/F 1,050 SF 2-BD 507 PL. PL.PL.

PL. STAIR #1 ELEV. DINLIV BD RM #2 KITCHEN BATH #2 CL. BALCONY BD RM C O R R I D O R BATH RMCL. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: 1,016 S.F. 40'-0" (TYP) 20'-0" (TYP) PLANTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY YUCCA ROSTRATA BEAKED YUCCA 24" BOX -- WUCOLS L MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' COMPACT MYRTLE 5 GAL -- L ROSA 'FLOWER CARPERT WHITE' WHITE CARPET ROSE 5 GAL -- L LEUCADENDRON 'EBONY' EBONY CONEFLOWER 15 GAL -- L LAVANDULA 'MUNSTEAD' MUNSTEAD ENGLISH LAVENDER 5 GAL -- L KALANCHOE BEHARENSIS FELT BUSH 15 GAL -- L AGAVE ATTENUATA 'RAY OF LIGHT' VARIEGATED FOXTAIL AGAVE 7 GAL -- L ALOE STRIATA CORAL ALOE 5 GAL -- L FESTUCA GLAUCA 'ELIJA BLUE' BLUE FESCUE 1 GAL -- L BULBINE FRUTESCENS 'HALLMARK' DWARF ORANGE BULBINE 1 GAL -- L CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM RESTIO 5 GAL -- L MYRICA CALIFORNICA PACIFIC WAX MYRTLE 5 GAL -- L CASUARINA 'COUSIN ITT' PROSTRATE SWAMP OAK 1 GAL -- L OLEA EUROPAEA 18'-20'H OLIVE TREE 7 VL TREE SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY WUCOLS MATURE HEIGHT BARE ROOT 25' ACACIA SUBPOROSA RIVER WATTLE 24" BOX 7 L 15' TIPUANA TIPU TIPU TREE 36" BOX 2 L 40-50' WESTRINGIA 'LOW HORIZON' DWARF COAST ROSEMARY 2 GAL -- L WESTRINGIA 'SMOKEY' SMOKEY COAST ROSEMARY 5 GAL -- L STRELITZIA NICOLAI GIANT BIRD OF PARADISE 24" BOX -- L MANGAVE 'LAVENDER LADY' MANGAVE 5 GAL -- L GERANIUM HARVEYI SILVER GERANIUM 1 GAL -- L GRAPTOPETALUM PARAGUAYENSE GHOST ECHEVERIA 1 GAL -- L COTINUS COGGYGRIA 'ROYAL PURPLE' PURPLE SMOKE TREE 15 GAL 5 L 10-15' HARDENBERGIA 'HAPPY WANDERER' BLUE LILAC VINE 5 GAL -- L LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24" BOX 4 L 30-40' PARKWAY PLANTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY WUCOLS MAGNOLIA 'ST. MARY' SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 36" BOX 1 (STANDARD) M ROSA 'FLOWER CARPERT WHITE' WHITE CARPET ROSE 5 GAL 24 L LESSINGIA FILAGINIFOLIA SILVER CARPET ASTER 5 GAL 16 L SHEET TITLE PROJECT TITLE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DATELANDSCAPE L-1 THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT. FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. LANDSCAPE PLAN (PLANNINF SUBMITTAL) SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN- SITE LEVEL APARTMENTS 126-128 KENWOOD ST. GLENDALE, CA 91205 1HARDSCAPE LEGEND 1 2 4'-0"H TILED WATER FEATURE WALL WITH METAL SQUARE SCUPPERS SPILLING INTO 12" BASIN 3 WALL MOUNTED WOOD BENCHES BY TOURNERSOL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4 18"H PLANTER WALLS WITH 14" WIDE PRECAST CONC. CAPS BY TECHOBLOC (TYP)- TREE PLANTER AREA 6'-0" x 6'-0" x 38" DEEP 5 'BOULEVARD' PLANTER BOX BY TOURNESOL (TYP) 6 6"x18" INDUSTRIA SMOOTH UNIT PAVERS BY TECHOBLOC 0 8' 16' 32' "DIAMOND" PAVERS WITH 6"X18" INDUSTRIA SMOOTH PAVER BORDER BY TECHOBLOC 3 5 7 7 24"x48" 'SILVERLAKE' ROOF TERRACE PAVERS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA PROVIDED= 2,556 SQ. FT. MIN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING IN OPEN SPACE (25%)= 639 SQ. FT. PROVIDED LANDSCAPING IN OPEN SPACE= 776 SQ. FT. REQUIRED SHADE TREES (1 PER 600 SQ. FT. OF OPEN SPACE)= 5 TREES PROVIDED SHADE TREES = 7 TREES MAXIMUM ALLOWED LANDSCAPING IN RAISED PLANTERS (25% OF LANDSCAPING)= 194 SQ. FT. PROVIDED LANDSCAPE IN RAISED PLANTERS= 78 SQ. FT. SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN- SUN DECK 9 26 8 8 5'-0"H WATER FEATURE EQUIP. SCREEN WALL (TO MATCH WALLS PER ARCH.) 4 4 NOTE: FINAL PLANT QUANTITY COUNTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PERMIT ISSUE SET SUBMITTAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 9 4'-0" TRANSIT BENCH AFFIXED TO PAVING 9 309 of 379

SHEET TITLE PROJECT TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DATE IMAGERY L-2 THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT. FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.

IMAGERY PLANT IMAGES HARDSCAPE IMAGES LEUCADENDRON 'EBONY' ROSA 'FLOWER CARPERT WHITE' YUCCA ROSTRATA MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' LAVANDULA 'MUNSTEAD' KALANCHOE BEHARENSIS AGAVE ATTENUATA 'RAY OF LIGHT' ALOE STRIATA FESTUCA GLAUCA 'ELIJA BLUE' BULBINE FRUTESCENS 'HALLMARK' CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM MYRICA CALIFORNICA CASUARINA 'COUSIN ITT' OLEA EUROPAEA 18'-20'H ACACIA SUBPOROSA TIPUANA TIPU WESTRINGIA 'LOW HORIZON' WESTRINGIA 'SMOKEY' STRELITZIA NICOLAI MANGAVE 'LAVENDER LADY' GERANIUM HARVEYI GRAPTOPETALUM PARAGUAYENSE COTINUS COGGYGRIA 'ROYAL PURPLE' WALL MOUNTED WOOD BENCHES BY TOURNERSOL BOULEVARD PLANTER BOXES WATER FEATURE WALL WITH METAL SQUARE SCUPPERS "DIAMOND" PAVERS WITH INDUSTRIA PAVER BORDER 'SILVERLAKE' ROOF TERRACE PAVERS APARTMENTS 126-128 KENWOOD ST. GLENDALE, CA 91205 HARDENBERGIA 'HAPPY WANDERER' TRANSIT BENCH- WOOD FINISH (surface mount) BY TOURNESOL SITEWORKS PARKWAY PLANTING MAGNOLIA 'ST. MARY' (STANDARD) ROSA 'FLOWER CARPERT WHITE' LESSINGIA FILAGINIFOLIA 310 of 379 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (OPEN TO SKY) 1,500 S/F UP DN UP (el. +544.51) (el. +545.63)
6 ' W A L K W A Y , P E R D S P ZONE
5 ' B U I L D I N G A D J A C E N T ZONE BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY PL.

PL. PL. LOBBY C O R R I D O R STAIR #1 ELEV.

BALCONY STAIR #3

C O R R I D O R BALCONY STORAGE

PL. PL.PL.

PL. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: 1,016 S.F. SHEET TITLE PROJECT TITLE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DATE THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT. FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. APARTMENTS 126-128 KENWOOD ST. GLENDALE, CA 91205 LV LANDSCAPE LIGHTING L-3

LOW VOLTAGE LANDSCAPE
LIGHTING LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING PATH LIGHT | NATURAL BRONZE T LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING TRANSFORMER ACCENT UPLIGHT- SMALL | NATURAL BRONZE ACCENT UPLIGHT- LARGE | NATURAL BRONZE STEP/ WALL LIGHT WITH DOUBLE LOUVRE | NATURAL BRONZE H20 UNDERWATER ACCENT LIGHT H20 ALL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING SHALL BE 2,700 KELVINS AND NOT EXCEED 430 LUMENS T SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" LV LANDSCAPE LIGHTING 0 8' 16' 32' 311 of 379 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 5-story, 40-unit, Residential Building
December 16, 2024

Page 1 of 5 ends

CC_12162025_Exhibit 2- CEQA Determination
PROJECT LOCATION: 126-128 S. Kenwood Street, Glendale, CA 91205 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Density Bonus to construct a new 5-story, 40-unit, multifamily residential building, featuring 3 affordable units (very low) and 37 market rate units and a two-level subterranean parking garage, located on a 14,988 square-foot lot in Downtown Specific Plan East Broadway District. The site is currently vacant.

CEQA REVIEW: The proposed multi-family residential project, located at 126-128 S.

Kenwood Street, is exempt from CEQA as a Class 32 “In-fill Development Projects” exemption, pursuant to § 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

CCR § 15300.2. Exceptions
(c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

There are no unusual circumstances associated with the project site. The project is located on the east side of South Kenwood Street, mid-block, between E.

Broadway and E. Harvard Street, in an urban environment with similar and complimentary uses in the immediate project vicinity.

The site consists of two adjoining lots and the topography is relatively flat. The lot that is addressed as 126 S. Kenwood Street has been vacant since 1990. The second lot that is addressed as 128 S. Kenwood Street was developed prior to 1908 with a Craftsman-style single-family residence and a detached garage. Both the single-family residence and garage will be demolished as part of the project.

According to records, the project site does not contain any features that are listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources or in a local register of historical resources. No significant events are known to have occurred at the site and the property is not associated with any persons of historic significance. The South Glendale Historic Resource Survey found that the property at 128 S. Kenwood Street is not eligible for designation at the federal, state, or local level (CHRC Status Code 6L) and it is therefore, not a historic resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines.

As indicated in the City’s Safety Element, the project site is not within a liquefaction zone, landslide hazard zone, dam inundation zone, fault hazard zone or fire hazard zone.
312 of 379
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 5-story, 40-unit, Residential Building
December 16, 2024

Page 2 of 5 ends

CCR § 15332. In-fill Development Projects Exemption
Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section.
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

The proposed residential development will be consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the project site as Downtown Specific Plan East Broadway District – which is generally east of Louise Street and west of Glendale Avenue between east Wilson and east Colorado. The site location provides ideal access to the regional freeway network as well as close-in convenience to the major shopping facilities of the Central Business District.

The standards within the Downtown Specific Plan East Broadway District provide for relatively large multiple dwelling complexes at a density of 90 dwellings to the acre. The Project proposes 40 units on an approximately 0.34-acre site and will increase the amount of housing opportunities in the DSP/EB with three affordable units (very low) and 37 market rate units. The Land Use Element is the most directly related to this use. All other elements of the General Plan will not be impacted as a result of the project. The project site has not been slated for open space or recreation and will operate within compliance of the Noise Element thresholds. The Circulation Element identifies South Kenwood Street as a local street. Local streets are generally adjacent to single- and multi-family residential land uses and carry low volumes of traffic to and from collectors and arterials. The primary function of local streets is to provide access to adjacent properties and connect to collector streets that distributes traffic to other neighborhoods, commercial land uses or public spaces and arterial streets that provide access to freeways, activity centers and business centers.

Vehicular access to the site will be from a new driveway entrance from the 20-foot-wide alley to the east. Additionally, the City’s Mobility Division has reviewed the proposed project and determined that no significant increase in traffic would occur as a result of the project, as it would not generate a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips to and from the site.

In addition to a parking concession, the applicant is seeking approval of one concession pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, et seq. and GMC Chapter 30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives) for increasing the maximum allowed FAR to 3.09 (45,983 SF), where the maximum allowed is 2.0 by right and 2.75 with incentives.

The requested concessions will reduce costs to the applicant for providing affordable units by creating construction efficiencies and inherent reductions in costs by allowing the construction of a greater number of units. The additional units will result in actual and identifiable cost reductions because the additional units will take advantage of construction efficiencies when being built and will generate rental income to offset the cost of providing the units at an affordable rent. In addition to the one requested density bonus FAR concession, the applicant is also requesting an administrative exception to reduce the width of the publicly accessible open space from the minimum required 30 feet to 24 feet. Aside from this request, the project complies with the applicable zoning designation and regulations.
313 of 379
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 5-story, 40-unit, Residential Building
December 16, 2024

Page 3 of 5 ends

(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

The project site is approximately 14,988 square feet, which is approximately 0.34 acres, much less than the maximum site size of 5 acres. Located in the Downtown Specific Plan East Broadway District, the project site is surrounded by urban uses and within City limits.

The subject property is located mid-block on the east side of South Kenwood Street and is surrounded by similar multi-family residential buildings to the north, east and west, and a single-family house to the south. There is a public alley to the east of the property, which will provide vehicular access to the site. The proposed project site is within city limits, no more than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The project is located in an area that has been heavily urbanized for decades. Natural vegetation does not exist on-site. The site is surrounded by densely developed urban properties and is unsuitable for use as a wildlife habitat due to its location. No wildlife species other than those which can tolerate human activity and/or are typically found in urban environments are known to exist on or near the project site. These human-tolerant species are neither sensitive, threatened, or endangered. Implementation of the project would not result in any impact to species identified as endangered, threatened, sensitive or being of special concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. In addition, the project site does not provide suitable habitat for endangered or rare species given the pattern, type, and level of development in the area. There are no indigenous trees located on the property or within 20 feet of the subject site.
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

Traffic
Project access will be provided from South Kenwood Street, between East Broadway and E.

Harvard Street. The project is proposing two levels of subterranean parking with a total of 69 parking spaces. The project is also providing 7 bicycle parking spaces. Vehicular access to and from the subterranean garage will be provided through an 18-foot wide, two-way driveway through the alley behind the project. Trip General Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition were estimated for the proposed project. According to the City’s Public Works Traffic Engineering Department, a local transportation analysis is not required for the proposed project because it is estimated to generate less than 50 total vehicle trips during AM and PM peak-hours.

The City’s Mobility Division has reviewed and approved the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for the proposed project. The project is located in Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) with 4.89 VMT Per Capita which is less than 85% of city wide average VMT PerCapita of 7.39.

A Construction Traffic Management Plan will be required to be submitted to the City’s Public Works Department for review and approval prior to project construction. The Construction Traffic Management Plan will include a Construction Traffic Control Plan, a Construction 314 of 379
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 5-story, 40-unit, Residential Building
December 16, 2024

Page 4 of 5 ends

Parking Plan, a Haul Routes Plan, and construction hours. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.

Noise
The project involves the demolition of a single-family house and a detached garage and the construction of a new 5-story, 40-unit residential building above a two-level semisubterranean garage, featuring three affordable units and 37 market rate units on an approximately 14,988 square-foot lot. The site is an interior lot bordered by residential uses to the north and west. The proposed residential use is permitted by right in the Downtown Specific Plan East Broadway District. As shown in the City’s Noise Element, the project site is located within the 60-65 dB noise contour. The new project would be constructed to reduce interior noise to acceptable levels as required by the building code, and the project is not anticipated to generate noise in excess of limits contained in the Noise Element.

Construction associated with the project will be required to comply with the City of Glendale Noise Ordinance (GMC Chapter 8.36), which prohibits construction activities between the hours of 7:00 PM on one day and 7:00 AM of the next day or from 7:00 PM on Saturday to 7:00 AM on Monday or from 7:00 PM preceding a holiday. Compliance with the City’s noise ordinance would ensure that noise impacts will be less than significant.

Air Quality
The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.29) was used to estimate air quality impacts during the construction and operation stages of the project.

Results from the model indicate that the proposed project would not exceed thresholds for construction, area, or operational impacts. No impacts would occur. Based on the model run, construction and operation of the project would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

Water Quality
Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct storm water discharges. In the City of Glendale, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) administers the NPDES permitting program and is responsible for developing NPDES permitting requirements. The NPDES program regulates industrial pollutant discharges that include construction activities.

Implementation of the proposed project will require compliance with all of the NPDES requirements, including the submittal and certification of plans and details showing both construction and post-construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are integrated into the design of the project. The submittal of a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), as approved by the City Engineer, will also be required to be integrated into the design of the project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project is not expected to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface of groundwater quality since the project will be required to comply with applicable permitting requirements.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The project site is an infill parcel. The portion of the site at 126 S. Kenwood Street has been vacant since 1990. The portion of the site at 128 S. Kenwood Street was developed prior to 315 of 379
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 5-story, 40-unit, Residential Building
December 16, 2024

Page 5 of 5 ends

1908 with a single-family residence and garage and will be demolished as part of the project. The site is surrounded by other residential developments and is located in an urbanized area and can be adequately served by existing public facilities. Section 65995 of the Government Code provides that school districts can collect a fee on a per square foot basis for new residential buildings to assist in the construction of or addition to schools. The State has determined that payment of the school fee mitigates impacts to schools to a level less than significant.

The Glendale Police Department provides police services to the project site. The overall need for police protection services is not expected to increase significantly as a result of the proposed project as the site is located in an already urbanized area.

The City of Glendale Fire Department provides fire and paramedic services to the project site.

The project will be required to comply with the Uniform Fire Code, including installation of fire sprinklers, and to submit plans to the Glendale Fire Department at the time building permits are submitted to ensure adequate fire flow protection.
316 of 379
CC_12162025_Exhibit 3- Campaign Finance Disclosure
317 of 379
318 of 379
319 of 379
320 of 379
1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

RECORD OF DECISION
(ADVISORY)
Meeting Date: August 28, 2025 Design Review Case No: PDR-002684-2023 Address: 126-128 S Kenwood Street
Applicant: Khan Consulting, Inc.

Project Summary:

To demolish the existing 1,592 square foot single family house and a detached garage (built in 1908), and to construct a new 45,983 SF, five-story, 40-unit multifamily residential project, over a two-level subterranean parking structure containing 69 parking spaces on a 14,988 square foot lot located in the Downtown Specific Plan, East Broadway District (DSP/EB) zone. The project includes:
• Ten one-bedroom units and 30 two-bedroom units.
• 69 parking spaces (45 standard and 24 tandem) within two levels of subterranean parking garage.
• Each unit provides a private balcony ranging from 50 square feet to 153 square feet totaling 2,838 square feet.
• 1,523 square foot sun deck on the 5th floor which includes landscaping around the parameter and seating area.
• 1,500 square foot publicly accessible open space on the ground level at the south side of the property which includes landscaping, decorative pavers and a water feature. • 2,072 square foot common open space on the ground level which includes landscaping and decorative pavers (1,056 square feet to the south and 1,016 square feet to the north). Outdoor seating area is proposed within the 1,056 square foot common open space area to the south of the proposed building.

CC_12162025_Exhibit 4- Stage II Design Review(Advisory) Decision Letter 321 of 379
126-128 S. Kenwood Street
PDR-002684-2023
2 Design Review Board:

Board Member Present Absent
Lockareff X
Kaskanian X
Simonian X
Halajian X
Welch X
Determination of Compatibility: Site Planning
The proposed site planning is appropriate to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons:
• The project complies with the setback requirements of the DSP and provides the minimum required 15-foot setback from curb face along Kenwood Street (4-ft. parkway, 6-ft. sidewalk, and 5-ft. building adjacent zone). The project provides a minimum of 5- foot interior setback on the south side and 7-inch interior setback for the first floor on the north side and 5-foot, 1-inch minimum interior setback for the rest of the floors. • The proposed floor area ratio (FAR) is 3.06 where the maximum FAR allowed within DSP is 2.75. The project received a concession under the project’s density bonus incentive to increase the FAR to 3.06. The building height is 65 feet, which is the maximum permitted by right within DSP.
• For developments with a FAR greater than 3.0, the DSP requires 20% of the gross site area to be open space and 50% of the open space is required to be dedicated as publicly accessible open space. An additional 140 square feet of residential open space is required per residential unit (can be provided as publicly accessible open space, common open space, or private open space). The project complies with the open space requirements of the DSP and provides a total of 1,500 square feet of publicly accessible open space located on the south side of the building. The proposed publicly accessible open space is appropriately integrated with the design and overall context. This area is 100 percent open to the sky and includes landscaping with a water feature, planters, and paved areas with seating benches. Additionally, the project features a total of 6,433 square feet of residential open space in the form of private residential balconies, a deck on the fifth floor, and common open space areas to the north and south of the project site. These areas are accessible to the residents of the building. • The project is required to provide a minimum of 70 parking spaces (in accordance with the Glendale Municipal Code (GMC), Chapter 30.32.050, Table 30-32-A). The project provides 69 parking spaces (45 standard, 24 tandem) within the two levels of subterranean parking garage. The applicant qualified for a mandatory parking concession under Density Bonus provisions which allows a minimum of 20 residential parking spaces because the project is located within a high-quality transit corridor and one-half mile of a major transit stop with unobstructed access (30.36.090 (C)(1)). To comply with GMC, Chapter 30.32.173, the project provides seven (7) bicycle parking spaces where six (6) bicycle parking spaces are required to be provided. Vehicular 322 of 379
126-128 S. Kenwood Street
PDR-002684-2023
3 access to the parking garage is appropriate to the overall design and located off the alley located to the east of the subject site and not visible from street frontage on Kenwood Street.
• The landscape plan primarily shows at-grade landscaping where the public and private open space areas are proposed. In general, the design minimizes the use of planters and includes benches. The landscape plan shows a variety of drought-tolerant trees and shrubs. The proposed top floor sun deck also provides landscaping around the edges with trellis and seating. Publicly accessible open space provides a water feature.

The water feature equipment will be screened as shown on the plans. • Utility rooms, storage rooms and a trash room for the project are proposed at the parking levels and on the ground level of the building and are screened from public view. The rooftop mechanical equipment is located in the center of the building and is screened by parapet walls and not visible from the street level.

Determination of Compatibility: Mass and Scale
The proposed massing and scale are appropriate to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons:
• The proposed 65-foot-high residential development has appropriately incorporated the required height and façade modulations into the design which add visual interest to the street-level.
• The project is also consistent with the surrounding development, which includes midrise residential and commercial buildings.
• To comply with the DSP “modulation of height” requirements, of the four available options, the project has incorporated a step back option where DSP standard calls for 15 feet minimum step back for upper floors above 40 feet in elevation height. The project is proposing to step back the fifth floor approximately 22 feet and provides a rooftop deck.
• To comply with the DSP “façade modulation” requirement, the project has incorporated a clearly delineated base, middle, and top. The ground level will incorporate aluminum panels in cream color mixed with walnut color horizontal aluminum wood look panels.

The middle of the building is defined by the consistent use of dark gray color vertical panels and the two horizontal metal belts in dark gray color, creating a top and bottom border for the middle of the project on the west façade and partially on the north and south façade. The middle portion of the building also incorporates horizontal aluminum wood look panels in walnut color. The top of the building is defined by beige color aluminum panels and steps back 22 feet from the front of the building. The very top floor of the building will include a larger setback from Kenwood Street which breaks up the building mass.

Determination of Compatibility: Design and Detailing
The proposed design and detailing are appropriate to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons:
• The contemporary/modern design of the proposed 5-story residential project fits within its urban context in the DSP’s East Broadway District developments and is appropriately articulated and designed for its location. The design is consistent with the design 323 of 379
126-128 S. Kenwood Street
PDR-002684-2023
4 standards, policies, and intent of the DSP as it utilizes architectural solutions using various high-quality building materials, colors, texture, offset massing, projections, publicly accessible open space, recessed entry, and canopy to articulate the building façade, particularly the street-facing façade along Kenwood Street. The proposed details and colors create a design that is unique and identifiable, while recognizing the priorities of the DSP to promote pedestrian activities and create human-scale architectural elements at ground level while the vehicular entrance to the building is located in the back of the property and therefore, not visible from Kenwood Street. • The building’s primary entrance (lobby) is located along Kenwood Street. The entrance is recessed from the sidewalk and is highlighted by a metal canopy that features the building name. The base of the building along with the primary entrance will have a planter wall. The paving material for this entry area (smooth 6’ x18” pavers) differentiates from the sidewalk.
• Per GMC Section 30.30.040 and the DSP standards, all exterior lighting shall be directed onto the driveways, walkways, and parking areas within the development and away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. A lighting plan (3D rendering) and light fixture specifications have been submitted and depicts vertical LED light fixtures between metal cladding (upper floors and corner feature) and light fixtures under the canopies at the first floor. LED round recessed lighting is proposed for balconies. Vertical lighting fixtures in matt bronze color are proposed for balcony walls. A landscape lighting plan is also submitted which shows pathway and access lighting within the landscape areas. • The DSP requires a visible and delineated roofline to visually demarcate where the building silhouette meets the sky. The overall termination at the roofline is suitable as the building facades of these areas and features roofline setbacks, a different material and color, and landscaping planters along the fifth-floor roof deck to add visual interest to the skyline.
• The fenestration design distinguishes the base from the middle and top of the building and the larger expanses of glazing are divided into smaller units. The project provides a variety of window sizes reflecting the different internal uses. This creates visual complexity that helps improve the façade modulations and is complementary to the design and scale of the building.

Design Review Board Recommendations to City Council
The Design Review Board made the following recommendations to the City Council:

1. The project’s open space areas are to be evenly distributed at the northern and southern interior yards to evenly balance open space on both sides of the building.

2. Minimize excessive amount of outdoor lighting to reduce glare.

3. Re-study window placements on the north façade to minimize potential line of sight privacy concerns.

4. Redesign the balconies on the north elevation to have solid or obscure glass instead of open metal railing to obscure the project’s private outdoor spaces.

5. Provide screening for the air conditioning units located on the roof of the building to minimize visual impact of mechanical equipment from adjacent building’s upper floor levels.
324 of 379
126-128 S. Kenwood Street
PDR-002684-2023
5 DRB Staff Member Shoghig Yepremian, Planner
325 of 379
CC_12162025_Exhibit 5- Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Approval Decision Letter 326 of 379
327 of 379
328 of 379
329 of 379
330 of 379
331 of 379
332 of 379
333 of 379
334 of 379
335 of 379
336 of 379
337 of 379
CC_12162025_Exhibit 6- Administratvie Exception Approval Decision Letter 338 of 379
339 of 379
340 of 379
341 of 379
342 of 379
343 of 379
344 of 379
Exhibit 7

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Stage II Design Review Case No. PDR-002684-2023
126-128 South Kenwood Street
City Council Meeting December 16, 2025
Stage I Preliminary Design Review City Council
Packet, July 30, 2025. See link here:
https://glendaleca.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetin
gTemplateId=37540.
345 of 379
CC_12162025_Exhibit 8- Stage I Preliminary Design Review City Council Motion 346 of 379
CC_12162025_Exhibit 9- Interdepartmental Comments
347 of 379
348 of 379
349 of 379
350 of 379
351 of 379
352 of 379
353 of 379
354 of 379
355 of 379
356 of 379
357 of 379
358 of 379
359 of 379
360 of 379
361 of 379
362 of 379
363 of 379
364 of 379
365 of 379
366 of 379
367 of 379
368 of 379
CC_12162025_Exhibit 10- Location Map
369 of 379
A. 126 S KENWOOD ST B. 128 S KENWOOD ST
CC_12162025_Exhibit 11- Photographs
370 of 379
C. 132 S KENWOOD ST D. 401 E HARVARD ST (VIEW FROM S KENWOOD ST) 371 of 379
D. 401 E HARVARD ST (VIEW FROM E HARVARD ST)
E. 404 E HARVARD ST (VIEW FROM HARVARD ST)
372 of 379
E. 404 E HARVARD ST (VIEW FROM S KENWOOD ST) F. 320 E HARVARD ST (VIEW FROM S KENWOOD ST) 373 of 379
F. 320 E HARVARD ST (VIEW FROM E HARVARD ST G. 133 S KENWOOD ST (VIEW FROM S KENWOOD ST) 374 of 379
G. 133 S KENWOOD ST (VIEW FROM E HARVARD ST) H & I. 117 & 115 S KENWOOD ST 375 of 379
J. 103 S KENWOOD ST (VIEW FROM S KENWOOD ST) J. 103 S KENWOOD ST (VIEW FROM E HARVARD ST) 376 of 379
K. 412 E BROADWAY (VIEW FROM E BROADWAY) K. & L. 412 E BROADWAY & 118 S KENWOOD ST 377 of 379
Montrose/Verdugo City/Sparr Heights Neighborhood Association P.O. Box 732
Verdugo City, CA 91046-0732
“Protecting our Paradise”
December 9, 2025
Mayor and City Council
City of Glendale
613 East Broadway, Suite 200
Glendale, CA 91206
Re: CORO and Surplus Land Designation
Dear Mayor Najarian, Members of the City Council and City Staff:

The Montrose/Verdugo City/Sparr Heights Neighborhood Association in 1997 with the mission of uniting our neighbors to protect our quality of life. For nearly three decades we have been advocating for our neighborhoods through the Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council and with the many community associations Glendale is fortunate to have. Our residents have shared their positions on the matters of the CORO and Surplus Land Use Designation with Council, City Staff and through petitions.

The Board of the MVSNA representing Montrose and adjoining neighborhoods supports:
 Removal of the CORO from the Land Use Element of the General Plan  Removal of the Surplus Land Designation for the City owned parking lots  Agendizing these items on a future City Council agenda We encourage the Council to act upon the comments of the many neighborhood associations through the GHCC and the residents of Glendale remove these items from the Land Use Element to develop and present a plan that enhances the quality of life in our City.

Sincerely,
Grant Michals
President, MVSNA
378 of 379
December 8, 2025
Mayor Ara Najarian Copy to Councilmembers, City Clerk
613 East Broadway Sent via email
Glendale, CA 91206
Re: GCC Meeting 12/9/2025, Item #13c
Dear Mayor Najarian,
I would like to respond to your mention of the Montrose Vision 20/20 plan (2016) and the comments made about it at the last City Council meeting on December 2, 2025. At the meeting, you stated that you seemed to recall that in the plan, stakeholders expressed a desire to increase foot traffic and add more parking, possibly through a multi-storied parking structure. The implication of your statements was that CORO allowing large multifamily apartments to be built on the Montrose “surplus” parking lots, would fulfill the goals of the plan. I am glad that you will be reviewing the plan for clarity.

I read the 24-page Vision plan this week. While residents and businessowners expressed a desire for a marketing strategy/rebranding in Montrose to increase foot traffic, nowhere in the plan did it identify residential housing as the solution to bring people to the Shopping Park. In fact, stakeholders expressed that making Montrose even more charming through a balance of businesses, artwork, and beautiful landscaping and hardscape, would attract more visitors.

Comments under Infrastructure: Goal 2 focused mainly on the physical appearance, safety, and usability of the parking lots with a possible Parking Advisory Committee being formed in the future. My question to you, Mr. Mayor: Was such a committee formed and what were their recommendations regarding the Montrose parking lots? I am confident that the response wasn’t to change the zoning to allow multi-storied, multifamily housing to be built there. Glendale should reconsider this poor decision.

One statement in the report stood out to me. On the first page it says, “It is your vision for your community.” That’s right. Let’s continue to work together, not at odds with each other, to make our community vision a reality and not harm Montrose.

Please re-agendize CORO and the SLA properties.

Sincerely,
Susan Bolan, Glendale Resident
[email protected]
379 of 379

Glendale City CouncilDecember 16, 2025

Glendale City Council
December 16, 2025