225 of 383
APPROVED BY CONTRACT CITY SURVEYOR
PSOMAS
AARON TILLMANNS, PLS 9584
DATE
10/23/2025
226 of 383
227 of 383
228 of 383
08/07/2025
229 of 383
230 of 383
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
STORM DRAINAGE UNIT
TO: HNTB DATE 04/16/2024
6 HUTTON CENTRE, SUITE 500
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707
(714) 460-1600
ATTN: Heather Anderson
PLAN CASE NO. EIMP2023000621
REVIEW OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
MTD NO. 1895
TR/PM NO. DORAN STREET GRADE
SEPARATION
PLAN CHECK NO. 1
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 03/26/2024
PLANS ARE DISAPPROVED
We have reviewed the plans for the proposed drainage improvements. Make corrections as shown on the returned set of plans and as noted below. Address all additional comments indicated in red on the returned set of project plan. Additional changes may be required as determined by further review.
After the revisions are corrected and approved, it will be necessary to obtain a Connection and/or Inspection Permit for the proposed drainage improvements prior to the commencement of construction. ☒ Army Corps 404 Permit, Regional Water Quality Control Board permit, & State Fish & Wildlife Permit may be required. ☒ Submit the Draft copies of the Corps 404 Permit, Regional Water Quality Control Board permit, & State Fish & Wildlife Permit for review before signing them.
☒ Army Corps of Engineers Connection Permit is required.
COVER SHEET COMMENTS
☒ All sheets must be stamped and signed by a valid Registered California Civil Engineer with current license. ☒ Make the indicated changes to the Hydraulic Elements Table. Discrepancies were found between the Hydraulic Elements Table and profiles.
GENERAL COMMENTS
☒ Provide rubber gaskets to 3 joints or 24’ (whichever is greater) in both directions of a cut/fill transition. ☒ Submit revised cost estimate.
CATCH BASIN COMMENTS
☒ Provide v-depth calculations for all catch basins. Minimum v-depth is 4.5’ per SPPWC. ☒ All catch basins require both Automatic Retractable Screen (ARS) devices and Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) devices to be installed.
EASEMENT COMMENTS
☒ Provide an exhibit sheet on your plans showing the storm drain system, all public right of ways, and all easements (including bearings and distances, who they will be dedicated to, and how they will be dedicated).
Exhibit 3
231 of 383
☒ Provide a copy of the Final Map/Separate Instrument for checking all easements and easement call -outs. ☒ Clarify if any existing easements need to be abandoned where the proposed drains connect to existing systems. ☒ All easements shall be made to The City of Glendale and be written so they can ultimately transfer to LACFCD.
SOILS COMMENTS
☒ The plans must be signed and stamped by a valid California Soils Engineer. ☒ Provide a soils report that specifically address es the proposed storm drain. It must include sufficient subsurface exploration data, pertinent test results and analyses, which address and evaluate the site , the proposed storm drain plans, analysis of channels, top berm widths less than 20 feet, analysis o f subdrainage system, suitability of existing soils, placement of storm drain next to faults, etc . The report must comply with the provisions of "Manual for Preparation of Geotechnical Reports" prepared by County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works. (Note: Tract grading reports are not sufficient. An addendum soils report which specifically address the latest storm drain plans is required. This addendum report may utilize and compile results of previous subsurface exploration, as applicable.) ☒ Comply with the Soils and Geology Section comments. (If applicable)
TRANSFER DRAIN COMMENTS
☒ Provide an exhibit sheet on your plans showing the storm drain system, all public right of ways, and all easements (including bearings and distances, who they will be dedicated to, and how they will be dedicated). ☒ Pay a fee to start the transfer drain process once this drain has been completed. See current fee schedule. ☒ Pay a fee to prepare, process, and/or quitclaim all necessary easements. See current fee schedule. ☒ Submit an 8 ½ X 11 copy of the key map.
☒ Storm Drain will not be eligible for transfer until all easements have been dedicated and or quitclaimed to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD).
MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS
☒ A pipe inspection fee will be required prior to issuance of permit. ☒ Address all additional comments indicated in red on the returned set of project plan.
REVIEWED BY:
Mikhailpoor, Alex – (626) 458-4921
232 of 383
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STORM DRAIN CLEARANCE CHECKLIST
FINAL TRACT/PARCEL MAP NO. FINAL MAP DATED
CLEARED BY CLEARED DATE
Required Complete
Storm Drain Plans Drain No.
Approved Approval Date:
$ Verification Fees ($5000 -TR & $2000 -PM) (as required in conditions of approval) Paid Date:
$ Storm Drain improvement bonds (+ ½ for labor & materials) Posted Date:
$ Offsite improvement bonds
Posted Date:
Offsite Improvement Plans Drain No.
Approved Approval Date:
Hydrology Study Plan Case No.
Approved Approval Date:
Final Map Plan Case No.
Submitted
Storm Drain Dedications Match FM (Dedications should be to LA County, and not LACFCD) Provided Date:
Offsite Easements (All dedications should be to LA County, and not LACFCD) Per FM
Separate Instrument
Date:
Date of recordation:
Abandonment Note on FM
Flood Hazard Limits
Limits Approved Date:
Limits Shown on FM
Provide F.H. Note For Lots No.:
Show Drainage Courses Adequately on FM
Maintenance Permits
Provided Date:
Drainage Benefit Assessment
Approved Engineer’s Report Date:
DBAA Formed Date:
233 of 383
Antelope Valley Fees
Paid Date:
$ Remaining outstanding balance of plan checking fee $ Remaining outstanding balance of verification fee
Copy of conditions of approval or city’s resolution for city project Provided Date:
Condition of approval:
Date:
Other:
Provided Date:
234 of 383
External Email: Use caution when clicking on links, replying, or opening attachments.
Outlook
Re: PLAN CASE NO. EIMP2023000621: REVIEW OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Doran Grade Separation Project
FromAlex Mikhailpoor <[email protected]>
Date Thu 4/18/2024 4:22 PM
To Kourosh Sameni <[email protected]>
Cc Heather Anderson <[email protected]>
Kourosh,
Good afternoon, I will forward the maintenance comment response over to our maintenance team and get back to you on their response.
Regarding the other questions
1. Please use the Design WSE. In your HEC-RAS results you show a Design WSE value right? Please use that as the control WSE of the downstream connection. If it is still below the invert, that is fine.
2. We will need the property owner (in this case the City), to grant an easement to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District prior to transfer. If the property owner if the City, then no action is needed prior to approval of plans as it is a public owner. With that said, please label the 10' minimum width easement on the plans. The plans should show the ultimate transferred condition which should say "10' Storm Drain Easement to Los Angeles County Flood Control District per Separate Instrument XXXX dated XX/XX/XXXX". That will be a placeholder on the plans until time of transfer.
3. To be honest that easement is causing me a bit of confusion. I think all we will need on this set, since its only a small portion of easement, is the easement called out on the plan view with acknowledgement label that the property owner is the City of Glendale.
4. Noted about the existing condition.
Please let me know if you need anything else, thanks.
Alex Mikhailpoor, P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer
Los Angeles County Public Works
(626) 458-3138
From: Kourosh Sameni
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 3:20 PM
To: Alex Mikhailpoor
Cc: Heather Anderson
Subject: PLAN CASE NO. EIMP2023000621: REVIEW OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Doran Grade Separation Project
3/23/26, 7:43 AM Re: PLAN CASE NO. EIMP2023000621: REVIEW OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Doran Grade Separation Projec… about:blank?windowId=SecondaryReadingPane2 1/2
235 of 383
CAUTION: External Email. Proceed Responsibly.
Hello Alex,
Follow up to our conversation, as requested please see attached questions and responses about using 42” RCP instead of 24” RCP, easement exhibit and existing condition analysis.
Thank you very much for your time.
Regards,
Kourosh Sameni, P.E.
Technical Advisor – Engineering
Transportation
Tel (714) 460-1661 Email [email protected]
HNTB CORPORATION
6 Hutton Centre Drive, Sutie 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 | hntb.com Celebrating 110 Years of Excellence
Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient and receive this communication, please delete this message and any attachments. Thank you.
3/23/26, 7:43 AM Re: PLAN CASE NO. EIMP2023000621: REVIEW OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Doran Grade Separation Projec… about:blank?windowId=SecondaryReadingPane2 2/2
236 of 383
GENERAL NOTES - PHASE A
NODUMPINGTHISDRAINSTOOCEAN
GENERAL NOTESA. NOTES1.EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO ELIMINATE THE DISCHARGE OF NON-STORMWATER FROM THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES.2.ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON-SITE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE VIASHEETFLOW, SWALES, AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES, OR WIND.3.STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM BEING TRANSPORTEDFROM THE SITE BY THE FORCES OF WIND OR WATER.4.FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TOCONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THEWEATHER. SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHEDINTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.5.EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY OR ANY OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONSSHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON-SITE UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE.6.TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED RECEPTACLE TO PREVENTCONTAMINATION OF RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND.7.SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEROADWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS FROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTALDEPOSITIONS MUST BE SWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS.8.ANY SLOPES WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED OF VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT EROSION BY WINDAND WATER.9.INSTALL BOTH AUTOMATIC RETRACTABLE SCREEN (ARS) DEVICES AND CONNECTOR PIPE SCREEN (CPS) DEVICES IN ALL CATCH BASINS.B.THE FOLLOWING BMPs AS OUTLINED IN, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BMP HANDBOOK(CONSTRUCTION) OR CALTRANS STORMWATER QUALITY HANDBOOKS (CONSTRUCTION SITE BMP MANUAL), MAY APPLYDURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT (ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE BYTHE PROJECT ENGINEER OR THE BUILDING OFFICAL):EROSION CONTROLEC1 SCHEDULINGEC2 PRESERVATION OF EXISTING VEGETATIONEC3 HYDRAULIC MULCHEC4 HYDROSEEDINGEC5 SOIL BINDERSEC6 STRAW MULCHEC7 GEOTEXTILES & MATSEC8 WOOD MULCHINGEC9 EARTH DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALESEC10 VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICESEC11 SLOPE DRAINSEC12 STREAMBANK STABILIZATIONEC13 RESERVEDEC14 COMPOST BLANKETSEC15 SOIL PREPARATION\ROUGHENINGEC16 NON-VEGETATED STABILIZATIONTEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROLSE1 SILT FENCESE2 SEDIMENT BASINSE3SEDIMRNT TRAPSE4 CHECK DAMSE5 FIBER ROLLSSE6 GRAVEL BAG BERMSE7 STREET SWEEPING AND VACUUMINGSE8 SANDBAG BARRIERSE9 STRAW BALE BARRIERSE10 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONSE11 ACTIVE TREATMENT SYSTEMSSE12 TEMPORARY SILT DIKESE13 COMPOST SOCKS & BERMSSE14 BIOFILTER BAGSWIND EROSION CONTROLWE1 WIND EROSION CONTROL EQUIPMENT TRACKING CONTROLTC1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXITTC2 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAYTC3 ENTRANCE/OUTLET TIRE WASHNON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENTNS1 WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICESNS2 DEWATERING OPERATIONSNS3 PAVING AND GRINDING OPERATIONSNS4 TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGNS5 CLEAR WATER DIVERSIONNS6 ILLICIT CONNECTION/DISCHARGENS7 POTABLE WATER/IRRIGATIONNS8 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANINGNS9 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELINGNS10 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCENS11 PILE DRIVING OPERATIONSNS12 CONCRETE CURINGNS13 CONCRETE FINISHINGNS14 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT USENS15 DEMOLITION ADJACENT TO WATERNS16 TEMPORARY BATCH PLANTSWASTE MANAGEMENT & MATERIAL POLLUTION CONTROLWM1 MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGEWM2 MATERIAL USEWM3 STOCKPILE MANAGEMENTWM4 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROLWM5 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTWM6 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENTWM7 CONTAMINATION SOIL MANAGEMENTWM8 CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENTWM9 SANITARY/SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENTWM10 LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT
STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FORROAD CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PLAN NOTES ALL CATCH BASINS AND INLETS THAT DISCHARGE INTO AN EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORMDRAIN MUST BE STENCILED TO DISCOURAGE ILLEGAL DUMPING OF POLLUTANTS. THISSTENCIL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 12 INCHES.
1.A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED AND ALL FEES AND DEPOSITS FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SHALL BE PAID TO THE PUBLIC WORKSAT THE PERMIT COUNTER, 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE, PRIOR TO STARTING WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. ALSO, ALLOTHER REQUIRED PERMITS, SUCH AS ROAD EXCAVATION PERMITS, MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE DISTRICT OFFICE LISTED ON THE "APPLICATION FOR STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTIONINSPECTION FORM I" TO ARRANGE FOR AN ACCEPTABLE CONSTRUCTION START DATE.3.APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A REPRESENTATION TO THE ACCURACY OF THELOCATION, OR THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, PIPE, OR STRUCTURE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THISPROJECT. THIS NOTE APPLIES TO ALL SHEETS.4.ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST ADOPTED EDITION OF THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKSCONSTRUCTION" (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS), AND SHALL BE PROSECUTED ONLY IN THE PRESENCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS.5.THE CONTRACTOR'S ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO BROWN BOOK 2006 SECTION 7-10.4.1 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKSCONSTRUCTION IN REGARD TO SAFETY ORDERS AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MINIMUM PUBLIC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN TRENCHEXCAVATIONS" AS SHOWN ON THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD PLAN 6008.6.ELEVATIONS ARE IN FEET REFER TO SURVEY CONTROL DRAWINGS.7.NO CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL THE FORMS AND REINFORCING STEEL HAVE BEEN PLACED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED.8.ALL STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SHALL BE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE WITH AN ULTIMATE 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF4000 PSI UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9.TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT AND TRANSVERSE JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLES (OR RADIAL) TO THE CONDUIT CENTERLINEEXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.10.ALL STEEL ADJACENT TO FACE OF CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A 2-1/2-INCH CLEARANCE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.11.REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE DEFORMED BARS OF INTERMEDIATE GRADE STEEL, PER ASTM A615 GRADE 60.12. ALL BAR BENDS AND HOOKS SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE "MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE."13.DIMENSIONS FROM FACE OF CONCRETE TO STEEL ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STEEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.14.ALL STEEL THAT IS TO BE CONTINUOUS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LAP OF 30 BAR DIAMETERS OR 18 INCHES, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.15.ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN THE FOOTING OR SLABS AND WALLS SHALL BE IN THE SAME PLANE. NO STAGGERING OF JOINTS WILLBE PERMITTED.16.ALL EXPOSED EDGES SHALL BE FINISHED WITH A 3/4-INCH CHAMFER.17.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CONCRETE DIMENSIONS SHALL BE MEASURED VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY AND PARALLEL OR AT RIGHTANGLES (OR RADIAL) TO THE CENTER LINE OF CONSTRUCTION.18.CONCRETE BACKFILL IS REQUIRED WHEN THE PIPE HAS LESS THAN ONE-FOOT OF COVER. THE CONCRETE BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF 1:3:5 MIX, PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE POURED FROM WALL TO WALL OF TRENCH AND FROM BOTTOM OF TRENCH TO A MINIMUMOF 4 INCHES OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE.19.ALL PIPES SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH IN NATURAL GROUND AND/OR COMPACTED FILL. THE GROUND LEVEL BEFORE THE TRENCHINGSHALL BE AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE ELEVATION OR AT FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION, WHICHEVER IS LESS.20.ALL BACKFILL AND RELATIVE COMPACTION FILLS OUTSIDE OF STREET RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM RELATIVECOMPACTION OF 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM SOIL TEST D 1557-91 METHOD D UNLESS OTHERWISESPECIFIED. THIS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER PRIORTO ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE COUNTY.21.ALL BACKFILL AND FILLS WITHIN STREET RIGHTS OF WAY SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED AND INSPECTED BY THE CITY. THE SOIL COMPACTION SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.22.PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE:IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD PLAN NO. 3092 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.ORACCORDING TO STANDARD PLAN NO. 3080, CASE III, EXCEPT BELL AND SPIGOT PIPE, WHICH SHALL BE CASE II BEDDING UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN. W VALUES SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON STANDARD PLAN NO. 3080 FOR CASE III BEDDING, NOTES 3 (A), 3 (B), AND 3 (C). IF THEW: VALUE AT THE TIP OF THE PIPE IS EXCEEDED, THE BEDDING SHALL BE MODIFIED AND/OR PIPE OF ADDITIONAL STRENGTH SHALL BEPROVIDED. THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS.23.PIPE SHALL BE EMBEDDED 5 INCHES INTO ALL STRUCTURES INCLUDING INLET AND HEAD WALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.24.THE MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCEMENT IN PRECAST CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE 1 INCH IN PIPE HAVING A WALL THICKNESSOF 2 1/2 INCHES OR GREATER AND 3/4 INCH IN PIPE HAVING A WALL THICKNESS OF LESS THAN 2 1/2 INCHES.25.ALL CATCH BASINS WITHIN THE DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE STREET PLANS26.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS A DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR CONTRIBUTORYFLOWS TO BE OPERABLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THIS STORM DRAIN SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE. THE DESIGN OF THE DRAINAGESYSTEM MUST BE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A CIVIL ENGINEER.27.ALL REFERENCES ON THIS PLAN TO THE COUNTY ENGINEER, ROAD DEPARTMENT, OR FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SHALL APPLY TO THEAPPROPRIATE ELEMENTS OF PUBLIC WORKS.28.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PLACE BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.29.WHERE THE UTILITIES ARE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE SUPPORTED, SAID SUPPORTS - SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION NO. 224 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.30.ALL OPENINGS RESULTING FROM THE CUTTING OR PARTIAL REMOVAL OF EXISTING CULVERTS, PIPES, OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES SHALLBE SEALED WITH 8 INCHES OF BRICK AND MORTAR OR 6 INCHES OF CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.31.MANHOLES SHALL USE THE STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION NO. 630 FOR THE "FRAME AND COVER" AND NO. 635FOR THE "STANDARD DROP STEP."32.THIS STORM DRAIN WILL NOT BE FIELD ACCEPTED UNTIL THE STREETS HAVE BEEN PAVED, MANHOLES BROUGHT TO GRADE, AND THESYSTEM CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS.33.A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT FROM THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD IS REQUIREDBEFORE ANY DISCHARGE OF NONSTORMWATER INTO THE STORM DRAIN IS ALLOWED.34.THE LATEST REVISED STANDARD PLAN OR DRAWING SHALL BE USED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.35.THE SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL INSPECT AND APPROVE THE FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS BEFORE STEEL OR CONCRETE IS PLACED.36.STORM DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS CONSTRUCTED PER S.P.P.W.C. STANDARD PLANS 630, 631, 632, AND 633 SHALL BE CAST WITH THE LETTERS“L.A.C.F.C.D.”. THE LETTERS SHALL BE 1 INCH IN HEIGHT AND PLACED BELOW THE LETTER “D” IN THE CENTER OF THE COVER.37.STORM DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS CONSTRUCTED PER S.P.P.W.C. STANDARD PLAN 312 SHALL BE CAST WITH THE LETTERS “L.A.C.F.C.D.”.THE LETTERS SHALL BE 1 INCH IN HEIGHT AND PLACED BELOW THE LETTER “D” IN THE CENTER OF THE COVER.38. ALL ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE STAMPED WITH THE DRAIN AND LINE NAME. THE LETTERING SHOULD BE 4” BLACK TEXT ON AYELLOW BACKGROUND.39.EVERY 100 FEET STATIONS SHALL BE LABELED ON THE INSIDE OF ALL STORM DRAINS AND WALL OF OPEN CHANNELS. THE LETTERINGSHOULD BE 4”BLACK TEXT ON A YELLOW BACKGROUND AND SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE SOFFIT OF PIPES AND THE TOP 2 FEET OF ACHANNEL WALL.40.FOR ALL DEBRIS BASINS, THE 0%, 5%, AND 25% DEBRIS CONE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE LABELED ON THE CONCRETE FACING SLAB ANDTHE STAND PIPE.
PS-MTD-DL - 04/2019EIMP SHEETOF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKSREVISIONSNO.REVISED BYAPPROVED BYDATE REVIEWED BYDATEDDNO. CITY ENGINEER
$DATE$$TIME$$FILEL$
FED ID XXXXXXXFED ID XXXXXXX
2023000621XXXXXX
DORAN STREET GRADE SEPARATION
DORAN ST GS
M.T.D. NO 1895LOS ANGELES COUNTYMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYHNTB Corporation 6 HUTTON CENTRE, SUITE 500SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707TEL (714) 460-1600 FAX (714) 460-1610 (SBE/DBE/MBE)
555 W. 5TH STREET, 35th FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA. 90013213.622.2100 OFFICE, 213.622.7330 FAX43132 LINE PIPE FROM STA.TO STA.REACHQ (CFS)SECTIONVELOCITY(FPS)REMARKS ******
50 YR. AND 25 YR. FREQUENCYHYDRAULIC ELEMENTS
ADD AN ADDITIONAL 12" OF CONCRETE OVER THE INVERT STEEL WHEN VEOCITIES ARE > 20 FPSADD AN ADDITIONAL 1" OF CONCRETE OVER THE INVERT STEEL WHEN VELOCITIES ARE > 30 FPSALL AN ADDITIONAL 12" OF CONCRETE OVER THE INVERT STEEL FORPIPE SIZERCP/NO RUBBERGASKETRCP WITH RUBBERGASKET *TOTAL LENGTH18"24"TOTAL SQ. FT. OF EASEMENTACQUIRED = 1145 SQ. FT.
A10+00.0011+56.848.995.25 A11+60.8413+36.148.996.56 A13+38.8613+57.178.995.25 A-110+00.0010+50.438.684.91 350.45'50.43'
A11+60.848.994.91 11+56.84PIPEMANHOLEA13+36.1413+38.868.996.56PIPEMANHOLEPIPEPIPE YESYES
*PLACEMENT OF GASKET DEPENDS ON THE RCP CHOSEN BY CONTRACTOR
CATCH BASIN STENCIL DETAIL
237 of 383
SCALE:
PPS-MTD-DL- 04/2019EIMP SHEETOF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKSREVISIONSNO. REVISED BYAPPROVED BYDATE
BY DATEREVIEWED ESTUCITY ENGINEER
$DATE$$TIME$
HOR. 1"= 20'VERT. 1"= 4'
$FILEL$
FED ID XXXXXXXFED ID XXXXXXX
20230007212023000621
DORAN STREET GRADE SEPARATION
DORAN ST GS
M.T.D. NO. 1895LOS ANGELES COUNTYMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYHNTB Corporation 6 HUTTON CENTRE, SUITE 500SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707TEL (714) 460-1600 FAX (714) 460-1610 (SBE/DBE/MBE)
555 W. 5TH STREET, 35th FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA. 90013213.622.2100 OFFICE, 213.622.7330 FAX 20'020'40'HORZ. SCALE 1" = 20'-0"10'
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+0010+00
175.30'156.84'N54°48'33"WLINE DATA TABLENo.BEARINGLENGTH
18.31'
CONSTRUCTION NOTESREINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP)79JUNCTION STRUCTURE WITH COLLAR PER MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS SHEET BR1-29108MAINTENANCE HOLE-PIPE TO PIPE (ONE OR BOTHMAINLINE IDs 33" OR SMALLER) PER SPPWC 321-2110LOCAL DEPRESSIONS AT CATCH BASIN PER SPPWC 313-486A LINE "A" & LAT "A-1"
50.43'N26°55'01"WN23°17'19"WN89°07'20"E
1234
CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN PER SPPWC 300-499A
44 PIPE BEDDING IN TRENCHES PER LACDPW STD PLAN 3080-2MONOLITHIC CATCH BASIN CONNECTION PER SPPWC 308-3111 132
450
455
460
465
470
445
440
475
INSTALL AUTOMATIC RETRACTABLE SCREEN (ARS) DEVICES ANDCONNECTOR PIPE SCREEN (CPS) DEVICES IN ALL CATCH BASINS.MAINTAINED BY CITY OF GLENDALE112121A 450
455
460
470
445
440
465
450
455
460
465
470
445
440
LINE "A" STA 10+00.00450.00 INV OUTJOIN EX. CHANNELL=156.84', 24" RCPCASE 3 BEDDING (1750D)Q =8.99 CFS, V=5.25 FPS LINE "A" STA 11+56.84450.63 INV OUT
PROP. MH#1LINE "A" STA 11+60.38= ST STA 16+54.36H=4.0', M=7.62'462.9 RIM LINE "A" STA 11+60.84450.65 INV INL=175.30', 24" RCPCASE 3 BEDDING (1750D)Q =8.99 CFS, V=6.56 FPS LINE "A" STA 13+36.14451.34 INV OUTLINE STA 13+38.86451.43 INV INL=18.31', 24" RCPCASE 3 BEDDING (1750D)Q =8.99 CFS, V=5.25 FPS LINE "A" STA 13+57.17451.52 INV OUT
PROP. CB#1,ST STA 18+47.75V=5.40', 456.98 TCEX. GRADEPROP. MH#2LINE "A" STA 13+37.83= ST STA 18+33.03= LINE "A-1" STA 10+00.00H=4.24', M=11"457.17 RIM LINE "A-1"452.03 INV INS=0.0050S=0.0040S=0.0040
PROP. GRADEEX. GRADEPROP. GRADE
EX. 16" RECYCLED WATEREX. 16" RECYCLED WATEREX. UG POWERTO BE RELOCATEDEX. UG POWER (BOTTOM OF THEWASH=429.65 INV)
VERDUGO WASH
HGL HGL HGLEX. RETAINING (SPRAY) WALLTO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE 25 25 25
PROP. GRADE
EX. ABAND 18" SSDESIGN WSE100-YEAR FLOODWSE = 443.29
PROP. JUNCTION STRUCTUREW/COLLAR PER MISCELLANEOUSDETAILS SHEET BR1-29 LINE "A"SEE PLAN VIEW BELOW
EX. 2" POTABLE WATERPROP. 2-5"C UG POWER
L=50.43', 18" RCPCASE 3 BEDDING (1750D)Q =8.68 CFS, V=4.91 FPS LINE "A-1" STA 10+50.43452.28 INV OUT
PROP. CB#2,ST STA 18+74.56V=4.54', 456.82 TC
S=0.0050
PROP. GRADEEX. GRADE
HGL
25 LINE "A-1" STA 10+00.00452.03 INV INLINE "A"451.52 INV OUT PROP. CB#1,ST STA 18+47.75V=5.40', 456.98 TC
LINE "A-1"SEE PLAN VIEW BELOW
11+00
12+00
EEE
EE E EE
EEEEEE E
EEE ESD
RWRW
WW
W
WWW WWWW
W
RW
RWRW
RWRW
RWRW
WWWWW FOFOFOFO
EEE
EE E EE
EEEEEE E
EEE ESD
RWRW
WW
W
WWW WWWW
W
RW
RWRW
RWRW
RWRW
WWWWW FOFOFOFO
FAIRMONT AVE "BRIDGE"108
SAN FERNANDO RD WEST EXTENSION (PUBLIC)
PROP. 24" RCP SDLINE "A"SEE PROFILE HEREON79110CITY OF GLENDALEX XX
X
XXXXXXX
X
X
XX
10+00 11+00
12+00
13+00
JOIN EX. CHANNELSEE PROFILE HEREONN=1878616.53, E=6477827.84A=67°, B=24", C=3.0'LINE "A" 10+00="VW" 7+26.85, 84.53 RTPROP. MH #1ST STA 16+54.36, 5.0' RT= LINE "A" STA 11+60.38' 110PROP. MH #2ST STA 18+33.03, 5.2' RT= LINE "A" STA 13+37.83= LINE "A-1" STA 10+00.00, A=45°79PROP. 24" RCP SD, LINE "A"SEE PROFILE HEREON 1 2 3
794
PROP. 18" RCP SD LINE "A-1"SEE PROFILE HERE ON
40'20'20'5'
PROP. C&G
PROP. C&GPROP. FENCEMAINTAINED BY CITY OF GLENDALE
PROP. FENCEMAINTAINED BYCITY OF GLENDALE
86ACB #2V=4.54', W=7.0'CASE E, K=5', H=2"=ST STA 18+74.56, 21.3' LT 86ACB #1V=5.40', W=7.0'CASE E, K=5', H=2"=ST STA 18+47.75, 20.0' LT 99A
99A
℄ SAN FERNANDO RD WEST
EX. RET. WALL
VERDUGO WASH℄ FAIRMONT AVE121A
121A 121A
121A
DORAN ST
LACFCD R/W
EX. ASPH. CURB
PROP. ST. LIGHT BASE
CALTRANS R/W
PROP. ST.LIGHT BASE
EX. ASPHALT CURBP/L 111
EX. ELECTRICAL (UG), GWPTO BE RELOCATED
ABAND. 18" SSLA COUNTY DL-1795-2
EX. 24" RECL. WATER, GWP
10' LACFCD ESMT
EX. 16" RECL. WATERPROTECTED IN PLACE
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD SD
PROP. 24" RCP SDLINE "A"SEE PROFILE HEREON79
WB ROUTE 134WB SR-134 TO I-5 CONNECTOR
112
112
EX. 12" DIP RAW WATERWELL LINE, GWP
PROP. GUARDRAILMAINTAINED BY CITY OF GLENDALE17+00
18+00
19+00
11+00
12+00
PROP. GUARDRAIL
EE
EEEEE
PROP. 2-5"C UG ELECTGWP
PROP. 3'X5'PULL BOX, GWP
EX. 16" DIP RAW WATERWELL LINE, GWPEX. 8" DIP RECYCLEDWATER, GWPEX. 6" DIP RECYCLEDWATER, GWP EX. 2" POTABLE WATERPROTECTED IN PLACE
238 of 383
Rev.
08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
WITH
CITY OF GLENDALE
This Freeway Maintenance Agreement (“AGREEMENT”) is made by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation (“STATE”), and the City of Glendale (“LOCAL AGENCY”); each may be referred to individually as a “PARTY,” and jointly as “PARTIES.”
RECITALS
1. WHEREAS, Freeway Agreements dated, April 25, 1953, November 25, 1955, June 7, 1961, November 29, 1961, Marc h 9, 1962, October 7, 1963, May 25, 1964, March 2, 1965, and June 13,
1966, were executed between LOCAL
AGENCY and STATE, to document the understanding between PARTIES regarding the planned traffic circulation features of the State Highway Routes (SR) 2, 5, 134, and 210 and the adjustments of the local street and road system required for the development of that portion of SRs 2, 5, 134, and 210 within the jurisdictional limits of the LOCAL AGENCY; and, a plan Map for such freeways were attached to the Freeway Agreement showing the delineation of STATE Highway and LOCAL AGENCY’s streets and roadways; and
2. WHEREAS, pursuant to the above Fr eeway Agreement and the attached Map, LOCAL AGENCY has resumed or will resume control and maintenance over each of the affected relocated or reconstructed LOCAL AGENCY streets, frontage roads, and other STATE constructed local streets, except for those portions adopted as a part of the freeway proper.
3. WHEREAS, the PARTIES executed prior Freeway Maintenance Agreements dated April 28, 1953, September 16, 1969, and July 3, 1972. This AGREEMENT supersedes the prior Freeway Maintenance Agreements.
4. WHEREAS PARTIES hereto mutually desire to clarify and define the PARTIES respective division of maintenance, and responsibilities as to their respective right of way and towards the following STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM (SHS) facilities:
• Vehicular Undercrossing
• Vehicular Overcrossings
• Non-vehicular Overcrossings
• Non-vehicular Undercrossing
• Walls- Retaining Walls, Columns, Soundwalls
Exhibit 4
239 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
• Landscaped Areas
• Screening
• Interchange Operation
• Bicycle Paths
5. State Highway System (SHS) Facilities.
Categories of SHS facilities covered under this AGREEMENT are limited to and specifically ide
ntified in Exhibit A:
Vehicular overcrossings and bridges over STATE right of way: These overcrossings are roadways constructed over and situated within State ROW supported by the deck, superstructure, and substructure (“Vehicular Overcrossings and appurtenant structures”). Non-vehicular pedestrian and bicycle overcrossings and bridges:
These overcrossings are pedestrian/bicycle path(s) and structures constructed over and within STATE ROW (“Non-Vehicular
Overcrossings”).
Vehicular and Non-vehicular undercrossing(s): These undercrossings are roadway(s) or non-vehicular pathways crossing under STATE ROW and appurtenant structures situated within STATE ROW. Walls- Sound walls, Retaining walls: These improvements include structural components of embankments and noise- reduction structures constructed within STATE ROW.
Landscaped areas: These areas include hardscaping, planting, vegetation and related landscaping improvements situated within inside of STATE ROW.
Screening: This includes fencing installed on a bridge safety barrier to protect the safety of the traveling public.
6. Definitions of Facility Components.
A. Deck surface – The surface of a bridge deck for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic over the SHS (e.g.; roadway surface).
B. Deck – The structural component of a bridge that supports and is below the deck surface (wearing surfaces) and above the superstructure.
C. Superstructure – Structural portions of a bridge supported by bridge columns/piers which are located below the deck.
D. Substructure – Structural components of a bridge that support the superstructure and distribute the load to bridge footings and foundations.
E. Bridge rails and posts – Portions of a bridge attached to the bridge deck and deck surface on overcrossings.
240 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
F. Structural/Roadway Drainage Facilities – Any facility provides drainage to any location, which consists of culverts, wing walls, drains, drain inlets, gutters, curbs, and inlet grates.
G. Lighting – Electrical lamps and light posts installed within State right of way that facilitate safe passage of traveling public.
H. Signage- Signs that provide any traffic related guidance.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
1. Prior Freeway Maintenance Agreements. This AGREEMENT supersedes the PARTIES’ prior Freeway Maintenanc e Agreements dated April 28, 1953, September 16, 1969, and July 3, 1972.
2. Maintenance Standards. PARTIES shall perform all maintenance in compliance with the standards set forth in Streets and Highways Code section 27, and in accordance with California laws, regulations and STATE standards, including STATE’S Maintenance Manual, Code of Safe Operating Practices, policies, procedures and specifications in effect and as amended. “Maintain” or “maintenance” under this AGREEMENT includes routine inspections of all structures and facilities, repairs, cleaning, replacements, and improvements, if necessary.
3. Control of Streets/Roads. STATE is not responsible for maintaining, repairing, improving or replacing any property or improvements that do not constitute part of the State Hi
ghway System (SHS). STATE agrees to continue to control those portions adopted as a part of SRs 2, 134, and 210 Freeway proper as shown in Exhibit A which is attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
PARTIES agree to their respective maintenance responsibility towards SHS facilities as specified in this AGREEMENT.
4. REVISING EXHIBITS. When a planned future improvement is constructed and/or a revision is or will be affected within the limits of the SHS herein described, PARTIES may revise this maintenance agreement by mutually agreeing to amend, replace, or provid e additional pages the Exhibits that must be executed by authorized repres entatives of PARTIES. Unless there is a material change to the obligations of each of PARTIES, no formal amendment to the body of the Agreement will be necessary. The revised exhibit will thereafter supersede the previous Exhibit and become part of this Agreement.
241 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
5. Amendment to Agreement. Except as provided in the preceding section concerning Exhibit amendments, the terms of this AGREEMENT can be changed only by a formal written amendment duly executed by all PARTIES.
6. Successors. This AGREEMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the PARTIES and their respective successors-in-interest including, any subsequently incorporated city or other municipality established within the LOCAL AGENCY’s jurisdictional limits. Upon the incorporation of a successor city or municipality within the boundaries of the LOCAL AGENCY that assumes legal jurisdiction over any portion of the maintained facilities, the LOCAL AGENCY shall promptly notify the STATE. PARTIES shall cooperate in good faith to obtain a successor agreement or a ssumption of obligations by the new successor entity within 180 days of incorporation. If the successor city or municipality fails to accept the obligations of the LOCAL AGENY within such period, LOCAL AGENCY shall continue to be contractually bound by the terms of this AGREEMENT, only with respect to the facilities still under its jurisdiction.
7. Encroachment Permits. Before LOCAL AGENCY may enter STATE ROW to install any encroachment or perform any ma intenance or work in the areas covered by this AGREEMENT, LOCAL AGEN CY must first apply for and obtain annual encroachment permit(s) from the STATE’s District 7 Encroachment Permit Office as per STATE’s EP policy. LOCAL AGENCY must apply for and obtain additional encroachment permits, if necessary, to enter or perform any work within STATE ROW not covered by this AGREEMENT. An encroachment permit issued by the STATE will be at no cost to LOCAL AGENCY.
9. Overcrossings (Vehicular and Non-vehicular). STATE and LOCAL AGENCY shall maintain Overcrossings respectively as follows:
A. STATE shall inspect and maintain at STATE’s expense, the structural components of the Overcrossing(s) which include the deck, deck surface where asphalt is not the wearing surface, superstructure, and substructure. STATE shall restore and/or restripe the deck surface when striping of the deck surface is removed due to inspection or maintenance by STATE.
B. LOCAL AGENCY shall perform all maintenance, inspections, repair, replace or complete other improvements of the following components of the Overcrossing:
1. Deck surface Deck surface where asphalt is the wearing surface; or other surfaces installed on the deck by LOCAL AGENCY;
2. Structural Drainage facilities
242 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
3. All portions of the overcrossing structure situated on and above the deck, which con
sists of lighting, traffic controls, traffic lights,
sidewalks, signs, bike paths, deck surface where asphalt is the wearing surface; or other surfaces installed on the bridge deck by LOCAL AGENCY, bridge rails and posts, pavement
markings, striping, and improvements in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and
4. Other improvements that may be constructed above or on the bridge deck by LOCAL AGENCY with STATE’s prior written
approval.
C. Graffiti Removal. LOCAL AGEN CY, at LOCAL AGENCY’s expense, shall remove all graffiti from the facilities described in this Section B.
Any graffiti that resembles or is on a mural, artwork, paintings, or other similar elements may not be removed without written authorization o f S T A T E . G r a f f i t i r e m o v a l m u s t b e p e r f o r m e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h State and Federal law.
D. Debris Removal. LOCAL AGENCY, at LOCAL AGENCY’s expense, shall remove and dispose of all debris and trash from the facilities described in Section B.
E. Unsheltered Encampments. LOCAL AGENCY, at the direction of the Chief of Police, shall remove Persons Experiencing Homelessness (PEH) and any structures, personal property, debris, and/or other items related to the encampment from the overcrossing, subject to LOCAL AGENCY’s policies and procedures relating to
Homelessness— including but not limited to Glendale Police Department Policy 432— as well applicable State and Federal Law.
Nothing in this Agreement grants or waives the right of California Highway Patrol (CHP) and other law enforcement agencies having jurisdiction over the Overcrossings.
F. Screening. LOCAL AGENCY is not responsible for maintaining screening that STATE installs on STATE freeway overcrossings pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 92.6
10. Undercrossings (Vehicular and Non-Vehicular). STATE and LOCAL AGENCY shall maintain Undercrossing(s) respectiv
ely as follows:
A. STATE shall inspect and maintain, at STATE’s expense, the structural components of the Undercrossing(s) including deck, deck surfaces, superstructure, substructure, structural drainage facilities and 243 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
undercrossing facilities and improvements. Drainage facilities shall be maintained so that stormwater runoff originating from the STATE Right-of-Way (ROW) does not discharge onto the surface of the LOCAL AGENCY Right-of-Way. All stormwater runoff from the STATE ROW must be conveyed into unde rground storm drainage systems, directing runoff away from LOCAL AGENCY ROW and any adjacent properties. The STATE shall implement and maintain effective erosion control measures within the STATE ROW to prevent sediment transport and related impacts on the LOCAL AGENCY’s ROW.
B. LOCAL AGENCY, at LOCAL AGENCY ’s expense, shall inspect, maintain, repair, replace, or complete other improvements necessary to maintain the facilities noted below:
1. LOCAL AGENCY’s improved and unimproved roadway
sections, which consist of road surfaces, shoulders, curbs, sidewalks, and gutters;
2. Roadway drainage facilities;
3. All portions above the LOCAL AGENCY’s improved and
unimproved roadway facilities, which consist of lighting, traffic controls, traffic lights, sidewalks, signs, bike paths, pavement markings, bridge rails and posts, striping, and improvements for compliance with the ADA; and
4. Other improvements that may be constructed by LOCAL
AGENCY on the improved or un improved roadway section(s) with STATE’s prior written approval.
C. Graffiti Removal. LOCAL AGENCY, at LOCAL AGENCY’s sole cost and expense, shall remove all graffiti from the facilities described in section B. Any graffiti that in an y way resembles a mural, artwork, paintings, or other similar elements shall not be removed without the written authorization of STATE. Graffiti removal must be performed in accordance with State and Federal law.
D. Debris Removal. LOCAL AGENCY, at LOCAL AGENCY’s expense, shall remove and dispose all debris and trash from the facilities described in Section B.
E. Unsheltered Encampments. LOCAL AGENCY, at the direction of the Chief of Police, shall remove Persons Experiencing Homelessness (PEH) and any structures, personal property, debris, and/or other items related to the encampment from the undercrossing, subject to LOCAL AGENCY’s policies and procedures relating to
Homelessness— including but not limited to Glendale Police Department Policy 432— as well as applicable State and Federal law. 244 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
Nothing in this Agreement grants or waives the right of Califor nia
Highway Patrol (CHP) and other law enforcement agencies having jurisdiction over the Undercrossings.
11. Walls, Columns. Retaining wall and Soundwalls. LOCAL AGENCY shall remove debris, trash, and graffiti and clean and paint any walls, soundwalls and similar structures on the sides facing LOCAL AGENCY’s streets/roadways. Any graffiti on a mural, artwork, paintings, or other similar elements may not be removed without written approval from the STATE.
12. Bicycle, Pedestrian Paths, Lanes and trails (TRAIL) A. LOCAL A
GENCY will maintain, TRAIL and all its related facilities, which consist of: paving, supportive structural components of the TRAIL, aggregate base shoulder, retaining walls, bridges (of any sort), all railings, bollards, storm water control measures, all fences, guard railing, drainage facilities, and slope and structural adequacy of bicycle/pedestrian TRAIL and any plantings or other types of roadside development located and constructed within LOCAL AGENCY jurisdiction in STATE's right of way.
B. In addition, LOCAL AGENCY will sweep and remove debris, as necessary. LOCAL AGENCY will main tain all signing and striping, electrical facilities (solar or otherwise), and pavement markings required for the direction and operation of that non-motorized facility.
Failure by LOCAL AGENCY to maintain TRAIL as per the terms of this Agreement will a
mount to a breach of the terms of the
Encroachment Permit and this Agreement and subject to the remedies stated in the Encroachment Permit.
C. LOCAL AGENCY, at LOCAL AGENCY’s expense, shall remove all graffiti and remove and dispose of all debris and trash from TRAIL.
Any graffiti that resembles or on a mural, artwork, paintings, or other similar elements may not be removed without prior written approval from the STATE.
LOCAL AGENCY shall perform structural and maintenance
inspections and repair, replace or complete other improvements of the trail as necessary.
245 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
13. LANDSCAPED AREAS – LOCAL AGENCY is responsible for the maintenance of any plantings or other types of roadside improvements installed and owned by LOCAL AGENCY as permitted encroachments l
ying inside and
outside of freeway right-of-way in Exhibit A. LOCAL AGENCY shall not enter or walk on the freeway proper.
14. STREET LIGHTING – LOCAL AGENCY is responsible to maintain all streetlights installed and owned by LOCAL AGENCY as permitted encroachments within the State’s right of way, which consist of ground mounted poles, conduits, and pull boxes. Responsibility of payment for electricity costs of the streetlights shall lie with LOCAL AGENCY.
15. Weed Abatement. LOCAL AGENCY shall eng age in weed abatement operations. LOCAL AGENCY shall control weeds. Any weed control performed by chemical weed sprays (herbicides) shall comply with all laws, rules, and regulations established by California Department of Food and Agriculture. All chemical spray operations shall be reported quarterly (form LA17) to STATE via the STATE’s Landscape Specialist, Maintenance Support, Caltrans District Office, 100 S. Main Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.
16. Legal Relations and Responsibilities.
A. No Third-Party Beneficiaries.
This AGREEMENT is not intended to create duties, obligations, or rights of third parties beyond the PARTIES to this AGREEMENT. Nor does this AGREEMENT affect a PARTY’s legal liability by imposing any standard of care for the operation and maintenance of STATE highways and LOCAL AGENCY facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law.
B. Indemnification.
Neither LOCAL AGENCY nor any of its officers or employees is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or o
mitted to be done by STATE in connection with
any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon STATE pursuant to this AGREEMENT. To the fullest ext ent permitted by law, STATE, shall fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless LOCAL AGENCY and its officers and employees from all clai ms, suits or actions of every kind occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, its contractors, sub-contractors, and/or its agents pursuant to this AGREEMENT.
246 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
Neither STATE nor any of its officers or employees is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon LOCAL AGENCY pursuant to this AGREEMENT. To the fullest extent permitted by law, LOCAL AGENCY, shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every kind occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY, its contractors, sub-contractors, and/or its agents pursuant to this AGREEMENT, and to the extent such acts or omissions are not caused in whole by the STATE.
This indemnity shall not apply to latent or pre-existing conditions in the STATE’s right-of-way not created by LCOAL AGENCY. Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive any statutory immunities or defenses available to LOCAL AGENCY.
C. Prevailing Wages and Labor Code Compliance. LOCAL AGENCY shall comply with any and all applicable labor and prevailing wage requirements in Labor Code Sections 1720 through 1815 and implementing regulations for any public works or maintenance contracts and subcontracts executed for the LOCAL AGENCY’s work under this AGREEMENT.
D. Self-Insured. LOCAL AGENCY is self-insured. LOCAL AGENCY shall deliver evidence of self-insured coverage providing general liability insurance, coverage of bodily injury and property damage liability, in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate and $5 million in excess, as may be amended as the minimum liability coverage limits codified in the State’s Standard Specifications, by delivering a Letter Certifying Self-Insurance. The Letter of Self-Insurance must be substantially in the form of Exhibit B, and identify the AGREEMENT number, and location as depicted in Exhibit A. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide the original Letter Certifying Self-Insurance as a condition to STATE’s execution of this AGREEMENT.
A copy of the original letter shall be attached to this AGREEMENT as Exhibit B.
Self-Insured using Contractor.
If the work performed under this
AGREEMENT is done by LOCAL AGENCY ‘s contractor(s), LOCAL AGENCY shall require its contractor(s) to maintain in force, during the term of this AGREEMENT, a polic y of general liability insurance, including coverage of bodily injury and property damage liability, naming STATE, its officers, agents and employees as the additional 247 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
insured in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate and $5 million in excess, as may be amended as the minimum liability coverage limits codified in the State’s Standard Specifications. LOCAL AGENCY will provide a certificate of insurance evidencing this insurance in a fo rm satisfactory to STATE as a condition to STATE’s execution of this AGREEMENT.
17. D
EFAULT. If a PARTY fails to perform obligations assumed under this agreement, the non-defaulting PARTY may by written notice request that the default be remedied within thirty (30) calendar days. if the defaulting PARTY fails or refuses to do so, the non-defaulting PARTY may complete the obligations and seek reimbursement fr om the defaulting PARTY who shall pay the invoice within thirty (30) cal endar days. If there is an immediate threat to maintain the structural integrity of, or prevent imminent danger of destruction to the features shown on Exhibit A, either PARTY may perform necessary maintenance or remedial measures to maintain the structural integrity and/or prevent destruction of the features without notice or delay.
18. COST. Any PARTY who is assigned obligation under this AGREEMENT s hall
complete them at their own costs, unless expressly stated otherwise in this AGREEMENT.
19. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the mutual written consent of each PARTY, or upon six (6) months prior written notice from one PARTY to the other PARTY accompanied by a rationale explaining why continuing the AGREEMENT is impractical.
20. Effective Date. This AGREEMENT shall become effective on the last of the dates each PARTY’s authorized re presentative has executed this AGREEMENT.
21. Authority. Each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of each PARTY represents and warrants that he/she is duly authorized to execute this AGREEMENT. LOCAL AGENCY represents and certifies that it has, through its regular political process, authorized the execution of this AGREEMENT by appropriate resolution, delegation, or plenary authority, as required. A true and correct copy of the local resolution or ordinance has been provided to the STATE.
22. Electronic Signatures. Electronic signatures of the PARTIES, whether digital or encrypted, are intended to authenticate this written AGREEMENT and shall have the same force and effect as manual signatures for this AGREEMENT.
248 of 383
Rev
. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
THE CITY OF
GLENDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Date: Date:
Mayor
Charles Is
aac
Acting Deputy District Director
Maintenance District 7
APPROVED:
Date:
City Manager
249 of 383
Rev. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
EXHIBIT A
(Plan map identifying the applicable STATE Routes (Freeway proper) and CITY road(s) and facilities. Also attach Exhibit A of Freeway Agreement) 250 of 383
OF GLENDALE
BOSTON Ave UC
B, No" 53 2322
NEW YORK Ave UC
B, No" 53 2308
LOWELL Ave UC
B, No" 53 2306
VERDUGO BI vd UC
B, No" 53 2231
HONOLULU Ave UC
B, No" 53 2321
FERN LANE UC
B, No" 53 2366
STANCRST D, UC
B, No" 53 2242
CONCORD St UC
B, No" 53 1744
SAN FERNANDO Rd UC
B, No" 53 1 790
SAN FERNANDO Rd WEST UC
B, No" 53 1790
COLUMBUS Ave POC
B, No" 53 1747
ALLEN Ave UC
B, No" 53 1081
�·������ � PENNSYLVANIA Ave UC �\��=
B, No" 53 2310 7 p-- =e=c
SHERER LANE UC
B, No" 53 1 894
LOUISE St OC
B, No" 53 1750
i ,
MOUNTAIN St OC
B, No" 53 1 893
CHEVY CHASE D, UC
B, No" 53 1 968
St OC
53 1 872
HOLLY D, OC
B, No" 53 1946
DORAN Ave POC
B, No" 53 1877
GLENOAKS Blvd UC
B, No" 53 1967
D, OC
53 1878
SINCLAIR D, UC VERDUGO Rd UC B, No" 53 1 878 B, No" 53 1 863 BRAND Blvd OC UC B, No" 53 1 749
JACKSON St OC
B, No" 53 1751
GLENDALE Ave OC
B, No" 53 1 875
WESTERN Ave UC
B, No" 53 1 079
SONORA Ave UC
B, No" 53 1 077
HAZEL St PUC
B, No" 53 1 076
HAZEL St PUC
B, No" 53 1 076
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, lRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
19.0/23.0
LA 27.1/28.2
134 5. 77 /8.44
210 15.6/16.8
26 251 of 383
CITY OlF GLENJDALE
LEGEND:
-- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
SAN FERNANDO ROAD WEST UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1790
SAN FERNANDO ROAD UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1790
CONCORD STREET UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1744
L_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
7 LA 134 5.9/6.15/6.1 26
252 of 383
LEGEND:
TO BE MAINTAINED BY
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CITY OF GLENDALE
CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
KENILWORTH Ave PUC
KENILWORTH AV
P ACIJ�i A VENUE ov\�i\Jf fI:G
No. 53 - 1145
UMBUS AVENUE POC B
Br No. 53 - 1746
r No. 53 - 1747
COLUMBUS Ave POC
BUSINESS, �!:�,:>:;;
ALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF
�
RAN
N AND
S
HOUSI NG AGENCY
PORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SH
7 LA 134 6.4, 6.6, 6.7
EET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
3 26
253 of 383
LEGEND:
,., TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
1111Ll..U,..I.
CKTY
ROUTE 134
OF GLENJDALE
CENTRAL AVENUE OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1748
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 134 6.96 26
254 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 134
OlF GLJEND LE
BRAND BOULEVARD OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1749
LOUISE STREET OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1750
ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 134 7.0, 7 .1 26
255 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 134
CKTY OlF GlLlENDAlLlE
JACKSON STREET OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1751
ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
7 LA 134 7 .40 6 26
256 of 383
CITY OF GLENDALE
LEGEND:
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 134
7 GENEVA STREET OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1752
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. OTAL SHEETS
LA 134 7,60 26
257 of 383
I
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 134
CKTY OlF GlLlENDAlLlE
GLRNDALE AVENUE OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1875
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 13'1 7.87 26
258 of 383
CITY OlF GLEND LE
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
DORAN Ave POC
.�
(f
ROUTE 134
\
-
""
\' -
�
�
DORAN AVENUE POC Br No. 53 - 1877
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
I
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
D ISTR !CT I COUNTY I ROUTE I SHEET PM !SHEET NO.h-OTAL SHEETS 7 I LA I 134 I 8.04 I 9 I 26
I I I I
259 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CKTY OlF GlLlEND lLlE
VERDUGO ROAD UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1863
CHEVY CHASE DRIVE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1866
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 134 8.23, 8.35 10 26
260 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CKTY
ROUTE 134
OlF GlLlENDAlLlE
SINCLAIR DRIVE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1878
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 134 8.55 26
261 of 383
CITY OlF GLENJDALE
LEGEND:
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
HARVEY DRIVE OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1884
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION ANO HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 134 8.81 12 26
262 of 383
l
CKTY OlF GLENDALE
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 134
HOLLY DRIVE OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1946
GLENOAKS BOULEVARD UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1967
CHEVY CHASE DRIVE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1968
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
*
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
L_------------�-------------------------,------------------'----- ---,
---"--L-A___L__2----'---l-9,l�l •9=.1,q91·2,----'------13_�_2_5 --'------j L_------------�-------------------------,------------------'----- ---,
---"--L-A___L__----'---l-l ,q91·2,----'------13_�_2_5 --'------j 26 263 of 383
CITY OF GLENDALE
LEGEND:
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
MOUNTAIN STREET OVERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1893
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. OTAL SHEETS
LA 20.1 14 26
264 of 383
CKTY OlF GlLlENDAlLlE
LEGEND:
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
-==""!. ED c::::::z
SHERER LANE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1894 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. OTAL SHEETS
LA 20.6 15 26
265 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
OlF GlLlENlDAlLlE
-s CD c;;;;;;;;;;z
FERN LANE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2366 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, 1RANSPORT ATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 21.6 16 26
266 of 383
I
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CKTY OlF GlLlENlD>AlLlE
====c: CD c:::::z
STANCREST DRIVE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2242
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 22.7 17 26
267 of 383
I
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CKTY OlF GlLlENDALlE
VERDUGO BOULEVARD UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2231
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 23.0 18 26
268 of 383
LEGEND:
-- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CITY OF GLENDALE
ROUTE 210
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2310 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
7 LA 210 16.8 19 26
269 of 383
LEGEND:
UL& TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
CKTY OF GLENDALE
__ _j�-- \
: --��---�- =��-""':
ROUTE 210 '
NEW YOUR AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2308 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. OTAL SHEETS
LA 210 16.5 20 26
270 of 383
CITY OF GLENDALE
LEGEND:
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
DUNSMORE AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2282
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. OTAL SHEETS
7 LA 210 15.3 21 26
271 of 383
OlF GLlENDALlE
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 210
BOSTON AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2322
HONOLULU AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2321
LOWELL AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 2306
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 210 15.1 's \5.7, 22 26
272 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
GLENDALE NARROWS
RIVERWALK TUC
CITY OlF GlLlENDAlLlE
GLENDALE NARROWS RIVERWALK TRAIL UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1075
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOT AL SHEETS
LA 27 .0 23 26
273 of 383
LEGEND:
CITY OF GLENDALE
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
JUSTIN Ave PUC
ROUTE s
HAZEL STREET PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1076
SONORA AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1077
JUSTIN AVENUE PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1078 HAZEL St PUC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 27.h_2?·5, 24 26
274 of 383
LEGEND:
- TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
THOMPSON Ave PUC
CKTY OJF GLENDALE
FLOWER St
ROUTE 5
WESTERN AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1079
THOMPSON AVENUE PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1080
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 27.8, 28.0 25 26
275 of 383
LEGEND:
CITY
TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY AT CITY'S EXPENSE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
ROUTE 5
OF GLENDALE
QJ
>
<(
z w
_J
_J
<(
I
ALLEN AVENUE UNDERCROSSING Br No. 53 - 1081
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FREEWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SHEET PM SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS
LA 28.1 26 26
276 of 383
Rev. 08/2023
MA # TR-07-24-RD05 District7 F/Y- 24/25-#
Entire City
EXHIBIT B
LETTER CERTIFYING CITY’S’S SELF-INSURED STATUS
On Local Agency letterhead
California Department of Transportation
100 South Main Street, MS 03
Los Angeles, CA 90012 ________________, 20___
ATTN: Charles Isaac
Re: Statement of Self-Insurance for CITY of Glendale for Freeway Maintenance Agreement No. 07-24-RD05 with California Department of Transportation for CITY performing work along SRs 2, 5, 134, and 210 within the State’s right of way.
Dear Mr. Isaac:
This letter certifies that the CITY of Glendale is self-insured and self-funded covering third-party claims arising out of its general operations (i.e., commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance). Further, the CITY is self- insured covering workers’ compensation claims and has received the consent of the State Department of Industrial Relations to do so.
Each fiscal year, as a part of its budgetary process, the CITY appropriates funds specifically to satisfy valid third-party claims and workers’ compensation claims, which may be brought against the CITY.
The CITY certifies its self-insured, general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage liability, meets the required coverage amounts in section 16-D (Insurance) of the Freeway Maintenance Agreement, specifically general liability insurance, coverage of bodily injury and property damage liability in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate and $5 million in excess.
If you need any additional information regarding this letter, please direct those inquiries through my office.
Sincerely,
Finance Manager/Risk Manager/Authorized Representative’s Title 277 of 383
DRAF T (03/04/2026)
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE
DORAN STREET GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
AND
THE CITY OF GLENDALE
[INSERT DATE]
EFFECTIVE DATE
Exhibit 5
278 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
CONTENTS
ARTICLE PAGE
1. SCOPE AND DURATION 32.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
33. INTERPRETATION
4EXHIBIT 1 – MAP OF DORAN STREET GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT 6EXHIBIT 2 – OPERATION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
7EXHIBIT 3 – SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
9 This Operation and Maintenance agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Los Angeles ("Los Angeles") and the City of Glendale ("Glendale"). Each individually referred to as a ("Party") and collectively as the ("Parties").
RECITALS
(A) Los Angeles is a chartered municipal corporation created pursuant to the California State Constitution with all the powers possible for a charter city under the constitution and laws of California, subject only to the limitations contained in the City of Los Angeles Charter and Administrative Code or otherwise under Applicable Law.
(B) Glendale is a chartered municipal corporation created pursuant to the California State Constitution with all the powers possible for a charter city under the constitution and laws of California, subject only to the limitations contained in the City of Glendale Charter and Administrative Code or otherwise under Applicable Law.
(C) On April 3, 2012, the Parties, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority and the Pelanconi Homeowners Association entered into a settlement agreement regarding the improvements on the West Doran Street rail crossing (the "Doran Street Grade Separation Project"), the west side of which is located in Los Angeles and the east side of which is located in Glendale as set out in Exhibit 1 (Map of Doran Street Grade Separation Project ). The settlement agreement included in Exhibit 3 (Settlement Agreement) was entered into as part of Investigation 10- 02-020 before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California filed February 25, 2010. The Parties under the Settlement Agreement agreed to the design and construct improvements to the West Doran Street rail crossing including: (i) a temporary one- way crossing with automatic warning devices until a grade separation can be constructed or, if a grade separation is impracticable and an alternative location for a grade separation is not possible, reconsideration of a full up-grade of the crossing with two- way traffic at the West Doran Street crossing, and (ii) a smoother approach grade at the West Doran Street crossing to be implemented by Glendale and Metrolink ("Improvements").
(D) Glendale and Los Angeles share the same goals of ensuring the public right of way is maintained in a state of good repair to ensure public safety. Under the Settlement Agreement, Glendale and Los Angeles are responsible for completing the Improvements with in each respective jurisdiction.
The Parties will commence construction of the Doran Street Grade Separation Project in March 2026, which is being funded through state and federal grant programs. (E) The purpose of this Agreement is to establish each Party's responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the Improvements upon completion of construction. 279 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the Parties as set out below, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. SCOPE AND DURATION
Los Angeles and Glendale agree to comply with the terms of this Agreement to satisfy each Party's obligation under the Settlement Agreement and ensure continued safe and efficient operation and maintenance of the Doran Street Grade Separation Project. This Agreement (and all of the rights and obligations under this Agreement) will come into effect on the Effective Date and continue until amended by the mutual consent of the Parties or terminated by either Party upon 180 days' prior written notice to the other Party.
2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Each Party agrees to comply with the roles and responsibilities for operation and maintenance of the Improvements in accordance with Exhibit 2 ( Operation and Maintenance Responsibilities ).
Each Party shall be responsible for all direct and indirect costs to operate, maintain, preserve, repair, replace and upgrade the Improvements located within each Party's jurisdiction whether or not expressly set out in Exhibit 2 (Operation and Maintenance Responsibilities).
Nothing in this Agreement is intended to affect the legal liability of either Party by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of the Improvements different from the standard of care required by law. Each Party shall be responsible for completing any operation and maintenance activities of the Improvements in accordance with Applicable Law. Neither Party nor any of its officers or employees are responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any activity or work done or omitted to be done by either Party under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the Party.
INDEMNITY
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4 and 895.6, Glendale and Los Angeles shall each assume the full liability imposed upon it, or any of its officers, agents or employees, by law for injury caused by any negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of this Agreement.
2. Glendale and Los Angeles indemnifies and holds harmless the other Party for any loss, costs, or expenses that may be imposed upon such other Party by virtue of Government Code section 895.2, which imposes joint civil liability upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement, as defined by Government Code section 895.
3. In the event of third- party loss caused by negligence, wrongful act or omission by both Parties, each Party shall bear financial responsibility in proportion to its percentage of fault as may be mutually agreed or judicially determined. The provisions of Civil Code Section 2778 regarding interpretation of indemnity agreements are hereby incorporated.
2.1 Amendments; Entire Agreement
This Agreement and any of its terms, covenants, representations, warranties, or conditions can only be amended, modified, or superseded by a written instrument duly executed by the Parties.
This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, including statements, repres entations and negotiations between the Parties with respect to the subject matter.
280 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
2.2 Governing Law and Jurisdiction
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any express rights and remedies under this Agreement are in addition to all rights and remedies available to a Party under law.
2.3 Severability
If any provision of this Agreement is ruled invalid by a court having proper jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability will not affect the validity or enforceability of the balance of this Agreement, which will remain in full force and effect and be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain such invalid or unenforceable clause, provision, Article, Section, subsection or part.
2.4 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. Each party consents to the use of electronic signatures. Either party may withdraw consent to receive electronic signatures at any time.
2.5 Limitation on Third Party Beneficiaries
Except to the extent that specific provisions (such as the indemnity provisions) identify third parties and expressly state that such third parties are entitled to benefits under this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or will be construed as creating or conferring any rights, benefits or remedies upon, or creating any obligations of the Parties toward, any person not a party to this Agreement.
2.6 Survival
The representations, warranties, indemnities, waivers and any express obligations of the Parties following termination, set out in this Agreement shall survive the expiration or termination, for any reason, of this Agreement.
3. INTERPRETATION
In this Agreement unless otherwise expressly stated: (i) headings are for convenience only and do not affect interpretation; (ii) a reference to this Agreement or any other agreement includes all exhibits, schedules, forms, appendices, addenda, attachments, or other documents attached to or otherwise expressly incorporated in this Agreement or any such other agreement (as applicable); and (iii) a reference to a singular word includes the plural and vice versa (as the context may require). This Agreement is not to be interpreted or construed against the interests of a Party merely because that Party proposed this Agreement or some provision of it, or because that Party relies on a provision of this Agreement to protect itself.
281 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Los Angeles and the City of Glendale have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorised representatives.
THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
ATTEST:
By: _____________________________
Name: Patrice Y. Lattimore, City Clerk_____
Title: Deputy City Clerk_______________
Date: _____________________________
APPROVE AS TO FORM:
Hydee Feldstein Soto
By: _____________________________
Name: Edward Jordan_________________
Title: Assistant City Attorney___________
Date: _____________________________
BUREAU OF STREET SERVICES
By: _____________________________
Name: Keith Mozee___________________
Title: Executive Director & General Manager
Date: _______________________________
BUREAU OF STREET LIGHTING
By: _____________________________
Name: Miguel Sangalang_______________
Title: Executive Director_______________
Date: ______________________________
THE CITY OF GLENDALE
By: _____________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
APPROVE AS TO FORM:
By: _____________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
282 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
Exhibit 1 – MAP OF DORAN STREET GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT
283 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
Exhibit 2 – OPERATION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
In accordance with Section 2 (Roles and Responsibilities), each Party shall be responsible for all direct and indirect costs to operate, maintain, preserve, repair, replace and upgrade the Improvements located within each Party's jurisdiction, whether or not expressly set out in the table below.
No. Description of Operation and Maintenance Activity Party Responsible
SAN FERNANDO ROAD WEST EXTENSION BRIDGE
1. Maintenance and inspection of drainage facilities, signage, striping, and graffiti abatement.
Glendale
2. Bridge maintenance and inspection of the bridge deck and structure.
Glendale
3. Operation and maintenance of the streetlights including poles, light fixtures, and power charges on the bridge structure.
Glendale
4. Coordination with Los Angeles County Flood Control and/or the Army Corp of Engineers to perform maintenance occurring within the Verdugo Wash channel.
Glendale
5. Operation and maintenance the new traffic signal installed on the bridge.
Glendale
SAN FERNANDO ROAD WEST EXTENSION
1. Glendale maintains the roadway including pavement, retaining wall, pedestrian facilities, and driveways within in the Glendale jurisdiction.
Glendale
2. Los Angeles maintains the roadway including pavement, drainage facilities, pedestrian facilities, and driveways within the Los Angeles jurisdiction.
Los Angeles
SAN FERNANDO ROAD INTERSECTION
1. Glendale maintains the reconfigured intersection including pavement, traffic signal, signage, striping, pedestrian facilities, and driveways.
Glendale
LANDSCAPING
1. Landscaping installed within Glendale city limits will be maintained by Glendale.
Glendale
2. Landscaping installed within Los Angeles city limits will be maintained by Los Angeles.
Los Angeles
284 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
STREETLIGHTS
1. Including poles, light fixtures, power charges and all street lighting infrastructure elements located within the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles shall be operated and maintained by the City of Los Angeles.
Los Angeles
2. Including poles, light fixtures, power charges and all street lighting infrastructure elements located within the jurisdiction of the City of Glendale shall be operated and maintained by the City of Glendale.
Glendale
STREET TREES
1. Trees installed within Los Angeles Los Angeles
2. Trees installed within Glendale Glendale
285 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
Exhibit 3 – SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
286 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
287 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
288 of 383
DRAFT (03/04/2026)
289 of 383
10c
26-89642
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: The Public Works Department (PWD) Pavement Management Program (PMP) - 2025 Update
1) Motion to note and file the PMP Report
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for April 28, 2026 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Glendale maintains approximately 378 miles of roadway and 27 miles of alleys, representing one of the city’s largest public assets with an estimated replacement value of approximately $840.6 million. The PMP uses modern data collection technologies to evaluate roadway conditions and guide pavement rehabilitation priorities.
The most recent PMP indicates an overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 65, reflecting a network in fair condition and a change from the PCI of 72 reported in the previous cycle five years ago. The analysis estimates that restoring the entire network to optimal condition would require approximately $238 million.
This report presents the latest PMP and updated PCI results, current and planned project delivery, and planning-level scenarios illustrating projected network condition under a range of investment levels over the next five years.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion to note and file the PWD report on the PMP.
ANALYSIS
History and Background
Roadways are among the city’s largest capital assets. Historically, resurfacing and reconstruction decisions have relied primarily on field expertise. The growing demands on the street network, aging infrastructure, constrained revenues, and adopted policy commitments require a data-driven approach so that the right treatments are applied to the right street at the right time. The PMP provides discipline through routine condition 290 of 383
10c2
26-89642
6 8
0 5
surveys, a central database, and planning level scenario tools that help identify the most cost-effective preservation strategy.
The PMP provides staff and decision-makers with a current roadway inventory, segment-level PCI results by pavement type and roadway classification, prioritized project candidates, and forecast tools. It assigns a PCI from 0 to 100 for each roadway segment (0 for failed streets to 100 for newly paved streets) and recommends the most cost-effective maintenance and repair strategy at the segment level. At the network level, the PMP optimizes life-cycle return on investment by prioritizing preservation to keep pavement in the most cost-effective portion of the life-cycle curve, rather than relying on a “worst-first” approach, meaning the PMP recognizes preservation of existing street conditions in addition to addressing the segments in the worst condition.
Figure 1: PCI Rating Scale
This approach translates into a work plan that realizes substantial cost differences between early preservation and late rehabilitation or reconstruction. When pavement is still in good-to-fair condition (PCI 56 to 100), preservation can extend service life at a relatively low cost and help keep more lane-miles within the preservation window. If work is deferred until pavement deteriorates into poor condition (PCI less than 55), more intensive rehabilitation is typically required, increasing cost, construction duration, and disruption. In practical terms, treating streets earlier typically lends itself to addressing more streets per dollar than waiting until streets fail.
Failed
(0-10)
Serious
(11-25)
Very Poor
(26-40)
Poor
(41-55)
Fair
(56-70)
Satisfactory
(71-85)
Good
(86-100)PCI
0 20 40 60 80 100
291 of 383
10c3
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Figure 2: Pavement Condition vs. Rehabilitation Cost Over Time Building on this framework, Glendale has prepared PMPs for more than two decades.
Since 2020, the PWD has modernized its data collection using Laser Crack Measurement Systems (LCMS), Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), and 360-degree imaging across the entire roadway network. The 2021 and 2025 PMPs generated objective PCI scores for every segment, providing a more accurate and consistent assessment of pavement conditions. This represents a significant improvement over prior PMPs, which relied on windshield surveys that are visual evaluations by the human eye performed from a slow-moving vehicle that were inherently more subjective and less data-driven than today’s automated technologies.
After data collection and development of the PCI maps, the next step is to develop an implementation plan. When developing pavement projects, the PMP uses a PCI-based approach to recommend treatments that match pavement condition, roadway classification, and surface type. In general, lower-cost preservation treatments are most effective when applied while pavement remains in good-to-fair condition, while more intensive rehabilitation or reconstruction is typically required once pavement deteriorates into poor condition. Furthermore, recommendations are evaluated and refined corridor by corridor.
Since the PMP outputs are generated at the segment level and may identify multiple treatment types along a single corridor, staff consolidate recommendations to limit the number of treatment types within a package and apply them across adjacent segments where appropriate. This approach captures economies of scale, reduces mobilizations, streamlines traffic control, and improves bid competitiveness. Bundling PMP projects 292 of 383
10c4
26-89642
6 8
0 5
also helps deliver improvements across multiple neighborhoods while maintaining alignment with pavement condition priorities.
Our Network Today
Arterial and collector streets carry regional and citywide trips and support emergency response, schools, transit, goods movement, and neighborhood access. Residential streets provide front-door access, on-street parking, traffic calming, and connections to schools and parks. Alleys serve refuse collection, deliveries, utility access, and rear-lot circulation.
Glendale’s current network PCI is 65. A PCI of 65 generally reflects a network in fair condition, where preservation is still a cost-effective approach on many segments. The roadway system’s estimated replacement value is about $840.6 million, and the one- time cost to return the network to target condition as identified in the PMP is approximately $238 million.
As indicated in the History and Background section, a change in methodology was implemented in the PMP. This change has contributed to the decrease in overall PCI from 72 to 65. The shift from subjective visual assessments to more rigorous, objective measurement methods allow for the identification of a broader range of surface distresses with greater accuracy, which has partially influenced the lower PCI values.
However, this methodological change is not the primary driver of the decline. The decrease more accurately reflects the continued aging and deterioration of the pavement network, as well as the current level of funding allocated toward pavement rehabilitation.
Figure 3: Glendale PCI History
73 74.6 76.2 73.8 72
65 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
2007 2010 2012 2015 2020 2025
PCI
Year
293 of 383
10c5
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Figure 4: Roadway Mileage and Average PCI by Functional Classification Compliance With Adopted Plans and Policies
PMP implementation projects are planned and delivered in compliance with adopted plans and policies, including the Roadway Design Policy, Local Roadway Safety Plan, Bicycle Transportation Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan, Safe Routes to School, Vision Zero, the ADA Transition Plan, Complete-Streets policies, MS4 and Green Streets requirements, traffic signal and operations plans, the Wastewater Master Plan, and the Storm Drain Master Plan. Projects are also coordinated with transit-priority initiatives such as planned Bus Rapid Transit corridors, and with Glendale Water and Power, SoCalGas, and telecommunications utilities, to integrate or sequence pavement work with utility improvements and minimize rework.
Furthermore, Installing or rehabilitating concrete curb and gutter where needed is also a significant component of the work to restore proper drainage, reduce standing water, and address public-health and vector-control concerns. These improvements generally precede or accompany the pavement rehabilitation projects. These projects, primarily ADA and sidewalk repairs, are necessary to complete before pavement work. However, they require significant staff time and funding, which reduces the resources available for other efforts and does not improve the overall network PCI. 294 of 383
10c6
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Planning Scenarios
The PMP includes planning scenario modeling to illustrate how overall network PCI could change over the next five years under different annual investment levels, as shown in Figure 5 and summarized below:
“Baseline” scenario indicates a continued decline in network PCI to approximately 60 in five years if no PMP implementation investment is made and no pavement preservation or rehabilitation projects are constructed. This scenario is not practical and is included for planning comparison purposes only, to illustrate the ongoing need for pavement investment to avoid further deterioration and need for greater investment in the long run.
“Current Annual Investment of Approximately $3 Million” scenario reflects the approximate current investment level of the City’s Gas Tax Fund, leading to a downward trend of the PCI to approximately 62 within five years. This suggests the current annual investment may slow but not fully offset the overall network PCI decline over that time period. “$9.72 Million Budget to Maintain PCI 65” scenario generally maintains network condition near current levels over the five-year period and results in an overall PCI of approximately 65 at the end of the five-year program. This scenario reflects a more preservation-focused approach that reduces near-term deterioration.
“$22.3 Million Budget to Achieve PCI 72” scenario illustrates PCI increases to the low-70s by the end of the period, indicating substantial improvements in the pavement condition over time.
It should be noted that these estimates are planning level and reflect pavement rehabilitation expenditures associated with PMP recommended treatments only. They do not include other project components that are often required and delivered alongside paving, such as concrete and ADA work, signals and traffic devices, utility adjustments, or other corridor improvements.
295 of 383
10c7
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Planning Scenarios
Figure 5: Projected PCI Over the Next Five Years Under Various Budget Scenarios Cost Escalation Reality
The budget figures above are stated in 2025 dollars and not adjusted for long term inflation. In practice, construction costs are incurred during the year in which work is performed and are subject to annual escalation driven by labor, materials, and market conditions. PWD applies a compound escalation rate of 4.5 percent per year for multi- year program planning. At this rate, a project budgeted at $10 million in January 2025 would require approximately $10.5 million if delivered in the current fiscal year, $10.9 million in FY 2027, $11.4 million in FY 2028, and $13 million if deferred to FY 2031.
Applied across the full five-year program, escalation adds approximately $2.9 million to the $3 million scenario, $9.5 million to the $9.72 million scenario, and $21.7 million to the $22.3 million scenario. These cost increases occur regardless of project scope, while at the same time, the pavement condition continues to decline, thus requiring a greater investment to achieve the same PCI outcome. Therefore, ongoing deferral is not a cost-neutral decision.
City’s Gas Tax Fund
Projects focused primarily on pavement preservation and rehabilitation rely mainly on Highway User Tax Account (HUTA), Gas Tax, and Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), which make up the City’s Gas Tax Fund, account for approximately $10 million per year.
Maintaining a current, data-driven PMP supports SB1 accountability by informing annual project lists and year-end reporting under the California Transportation Commission’s Local Streets and Roads Program and by providing a transparent basis for pavement investment decisions. Of the approximately $10 million in annual HUTA and SB1 296 of 383
10c8
26-89642
6 8
0 5
receipts, a portion is allocated to support ADA and sidewalk programs, non-PMP infrastructure obligations, and program delivery overhead, leaving approximately $3 million per year in direct pavement rehabilitation.
To help close the funding gap, staff leverage subregional agency funds allocated to the city, pursue competitive external grant opportunities, and program recurring regional local return revenues allocated to Glendale. These funding sources are strategically combined to support predictable, multi-year pavement programs aligned with annual PMP implementation. When additional funds are secured, staff can accelerate project delivery, which helps maintain or improve the overall network PCI.
Past 5-Year Projects
Over the past five years, PWD has delivered a significant number of roadway and corridor improvement projects consistent with PMP priorities and incorporating other adopted plans. As listed in Exhibit 2, a total of 20 projects were completed, representing a combined construction contract value of approximately $97 million.
In addition to advancing PMP initiatives, these completed projects included various related improvements such as concrete sidewalk repairs and ADA upgrades, sewer and storm drain improvements, traffic signals, striping and pavement markings, green infrastructure, and other related elements. Of the total amount spent, approximately 14%, or about $14 million, was estimated to be directly attributable to pavement rehabilitation and asphalt improvements, resulting in an average delivery of approximately $3 million in pavement improvements.
297 of 383
10c9
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Figure 6: Last Five Years’ Average Distribution of Expenditure for PMP Projects Future Considerations for the Next PMP
PWD is in the process of issuing a new Request for Proposals (RFP) to develop the next round of the PMP and staff is evaluating additional measures to help protect the city’s pavement investment and improve long-term program performance. These future considerations may include strengthening trench moratorium enforcement for newly paved streets so that pavement cuts are limited and violations are tracked and enforced; improving pre-paving coordination with public and private utilities so that utility work is completed before resurfacing whenever feasible by holding them accountable for completing the work in time; updating trench restoration standards to help ensure that repairs more closely match surrounding pavement quality and extend service life tied to pavement conditions; and continuing to refine project packaging and unit-cost tracking practices to support competitive bids, efficient delivery, and maximum pavement coverage.
These measures would not replace the need for continued pavement investment, but they could help improve the durability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term value of the city’s roadway infrastructure. Staff expect these topics to be important considerations as future PMP updates and related implementation strategies are developed.
Asphalt Pavement
14%
Concrete Improvement
22%
Green Improvements
16%
Sewer and Stormwater
10%
Striping and Traffic
Signal
29%
Misc. Improvements
9%
Asphalt Pavement Concrete Improvement Green Improvements Sewer and Storwater Striping and Traffic Signal Misc. Improvements
TOTAL SPENT
$97 million
298 of 383
10c10
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Conclusion
The anticipated five-year CIP reflects a substantial delivery commitment. PWD has planned 35 projects to advance PMP delivery goals, 25 of which have identified funding sources, representing approximately $63 million in PMP-targeted pavement investment as part of a broader CIP program portfolio. This funded program presents a strong opportunity to maintain the overall network PCI and roadway conditions over the next five years.
PWD will continue to advance these projects through planning, design, and construction using efficient project sequencing and supplemental delivery strategies, including alternative delivery methods, on-call contracts, staff augmentation, and consultant support, to maximize delivery and ensure that available funding is converted into completed improvements.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
PWD will continue to maintain the public-facing web maps on the department’s website and provide the PMP updates, including pavement conditions, planned and completed work, treatment types, funding sources, and schedule windows.
The department’s interactive GIS map will display PCI by street segment, the upcoming year work plan, and construction moratorium information, allowing residents to search by address or location and view projects planned as part of the CIP. Project-level information will also be posted on the project-dedicated webpage for each project individually.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with noting and filing this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable for this report.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not applicable for this report.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Since this report is structured as informational, no staff recommendations or alternatives are included aside from a motion to note and file.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
299 of 383
10c11
26-89642
6 8
0 5
Prepared by:
Sarkis Oganesyan, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer Armen Avazian, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer
Viktoriya Pakhanyan, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Rustom Tavitian, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: PMP Report
Exhibit 2: List of Past 5-Year CIP
Exhibit 3: PMP GIS web map (available online): glendaleca.gov/PWPCIMap Exhibit 4: CIP GIS web map (available online): glendaleca.gov/PWCIPMap Exhibit 5: Moratorium Streets GIS web map (available online):
glendaleca.gov/PWStreetMoratorium
300 of 383
10c
24-86817
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ______________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________ , that the April 14, 2026 report by the Director of Public Works regarding the Glendale Pavement Management Program update and the results of the most recent City-wide pavement condition survey are hereby noted and filed, and that the City Council provides direction on the development of the upcoming five-year Capital Improvement Program as follows:
Votes as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
301 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 1 of 55
2024 Pavement Management Report
for
City of Glendale, CA
Prepared by
Transmap Corporation
5030 Transamerica Drive
Columbus, OH 43228
Phone: 614-810-1235
Fax: 614-481-4017
Web: Transmap.com
December 2024
302 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 2 of 55
Table of Contents
Section Page Number
Executive Summary 7
1.0 All Pavements
1.1 Road Characteristics
12 14
2.0 Budget Scenarios Details
2.1 Fix-All Costs
2.2 Do Nothing Scenarios
2.3 Given Annual Budget Consequences
2.4 Annual Budgets to Maintain Existing PCI
2.5 Annual Budgets to Achieve PCI 72
2.7 Scenario Summaries
17 17
20 25
29 33
37 APPENDIX A – Boot Camp Meeting Notes 41
APPENDIX B – Parking Lot Conditions 45
APPENDIX C – Pavement Performance Curves 46
APPENDIX D – Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Formula 49
APPENDIX E – Principles of Pavement Management 50
APPENDIX E – Work Plans 56
303 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 3 of 55
List of Figures Page
Figure ES-1 Distribution of Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collector roads by PCI Range 8 Figure ES-2 Distribution of Asphalt Residential roads by PCI Range 9 Figure ES-3 Distribution of Asphalt Alleys by PCI Range 9 Figure ES-4 Historical PCI (Condition) Distribution of Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collector roads 10 Figure ES-4 Historical PCI (Condition) Distribution of Asphalt Residential roads 10 Figure ES-4 Historical PCI (Condition) Distribution of Asphalt Alleys 11 Figure 1 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Do Nothing Consequences 20 Figure 2 – Residential Asphalt Roads – Do Nothing Consequences 21 Figure 3 – Asphalt Alleys – Do Nothing Consequences 22
Figure 4 – Concrete Pavements – Do Nothing Consequences 23 Figure 5 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Given $1.438M Annual Budget 24 Figure 6 – Residential Asphalt Roads – Given $1.387M Annual Budget 25 Figure 7 – Asphalt Alleys – Given $31K Annual Budget 26 Figure 8 – Concrete Pavements – Given $144K Annual Budget 27 Figure 9 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – $933K Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 68 28
Figure 10 – Residential Asphalt Roads – $7.07M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 61 29 Figure 11 – Asphalt Alleys – Avg. $191K Annual Budgets to Maintain PCI of 60 30 Figure 12 – Concrete Pavements – Avg $1.526M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 69 31 Figure 13 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Avg. $4.808M Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 32
Figure 14 – Residential Asphalt Roads – $14.46M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 33 Figure 15 – Asphalt Alleys – Avg $398K Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 34 Figure 16 – Concrete Pavements – Avg $2.598M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 35 Figure 17 – Main/Arterial/Collectors Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary 36 Figure 18 – Residential Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary 37 Figure 19 – Asphalt Alleys – Scenarios Summary 38
Figure 20 – All Concrete Pavements – Scenarios Summary 39 304 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 4 of 55
Figure C.1 Main/Arterial/Collector AC Roads - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
45 Figure C.2. Residential AC Roads - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
46 Figure C.3. Asphalt Alleys - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
46 Figure C.4. Concrete Pavements - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
47 305 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 5 of 55
List of Tables Page
#
Table 1 – Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Treatments & PCI Ranges and Costs 12 Table 2 – Residential Asphalt Roads – Treatments & PCI Ranges and Costs 12 Table 3 – Asphalt Alleys – Treatments & PCI Ranges and Costs 13 Table 4 – Concrete Pavements – Treatments & PCI Ranges and Costs 13 Table 5 – Distribution of All Roads by Pavement Type 14 Table 6 - Distribution of Asphalt Roads by Functional Class 14 Table 7 - Distribution of Asphalt Roads by Functional Class and Surface Type 15 Table 8 - Distribution of Roads by /Zone 16
Table 9 – Main/Arterial/Collector AC Roads – “Fix All” Cost 17 Table 10 – Residential Asphalt Roads – “Fix All” Cost 18 Table 11 - Asphalt Alleys – “Fix All” Cost 18
Table 12 – Concrete Pavements – “Fix All” Cost 19
Table 13 – Main/Arterial/Collector AC Roads – Do Nothing Consequences 20 Table 14 – Residential Asphalt Roads – Do Nothing Consequences 21 Table 15 – Asphalt Alleys – Do Nothing Consequences 22
Table 16 – Concrete Pavements – Do Nothing Consequences 23 Table 17 – Main/Arterial/Collector AC Roads – Given $1.438M Annual Budget 24 Table 18 – Residential Asphalt Roads – Given $1.387M Annual Budgets 25 Table 19 – Asphalt Alleys – Given $31K Annual Budgets 26 Table 20 – Concrete Pavements – Given $144K Annual Budgets 27 Table 21 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – $933K Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 68 28
Table 22 – Residential Asphalt Roads – Avg $7.07M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 61 29 Table 23 – Asphalt Alleys – Avg. $191K Annual Budgets to Maintain PCI of 60 30 Table 24 – Concrete Pavements - Avg $1.526M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 69 31 Table 25 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Avg. $4.808M Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 32
Table 26 – Residential Asphalt Roads – $14.46M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 33 Table 27 – Asphalt Alleys – Avg $398K Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 34 306 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 6 of 55
Table 28 – Concrete Pavements – Avg $2.598M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72 35 Table 29 – Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary 36 Table 30 – Residential Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary 37 Table 31 – Asphalt Alleys - Scenarios Summary 38
Table 32 –Concrete Pavements - Scenarios Summary 39
307 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 7 of 55
2024 Pavement Management System Report
Executive Summary
The nation's roadway system represents an investment of trillions of dollars by local, state, and federal governments. To protect its investment, Glendale hired Transmap Corporation to assist in the development of a Network Pavement Management program. This program is designed to assist in the preservation and extending the useful life of its paved surfaces throughout the region by optimizing the available funds to meet the road network needs.
Transmap utilizes PAVER (ver. 7.1) to perform road analysis. PAVER, a pavement management system (PMS), is a decision-making tool for the development of cost-effective maintenance and repair alternatives for roads and streets. Developed and maintained by the US Army Corps of Engineers Research and Development Center, it provides a Network-Level, systematic approach to pavement management with the goal of optimizing return on investment based on condition, defined as PCI.
PAVER employs a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) condition rating for each segment of roadway (intersection to intersection) in its assessment, on a 0 (Failed) to 100 (Excellent) scale. The inspection criteria and PCI determination are governed by ASTM Standard D6433-11, “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys”, developed by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and used throughout the pavement assessment industry, to provide an objective and repeatable basis for describing road conditions.
These assessments are performed by sampling each road segment, but in recent years Transmap has progressed to conduct surveys utilizing detailed laser crack measurements of 100% of the roadway surface and compiling the data to provide a comprehensive PCI. The benefit is a much more accurate and realistic description that, in many cases, often significantly differs with past evaluations which alter results.
Glendale maintains approximately 377.43 centerline miles of asphalt, concrete, brick, and unpaved roads, including 26.73 centerline miles of asphalt and concrete alleys. There are also 7,635 square yards of parking lot, which are not included in the analysis of this report along with the brick and unpaved roads.
This represents an investment of roughly $840.6M, based on the replacement (reconstruction) costs provided by the city. With an overall network PCI of 65, the “fix-all” cost (cost of employing all treatments at once) is $238.4M, containing $67.5M of present reconstruction needs, 46.9% of which are concrete roads. (See Tables through ).
On August 14, 2024, a (Boot Camp) meeting was held to begin the process of gathering the necessary information to produce a Pavement Management System (PMS) report. The report consists of a 5- year plan with a start date of July 1, 2025, requiring that the conditions found during the survey, conducted in December of 2023, be projected forward, using the pavement performance models.
The Pavement Performance Models were updated from the City’s maintenance history data and can be seen in Appendix B of this report.
The City has 12 maintenance zones, which are listed by segment in the work plans. The network is divided into 4 families for analysis, consisting of Asphalt Arterial/Collector, Residential, Alleys, roadways, and all Concrete roads, each with individual pavement performance models. Critical PCI’s match the divisions between Global and Conventional treatment ranges for each family as 65, 60, 55, and 50, respectively.
All concrete roads, regardless of functional classification, were combined into one family due to their differences in treatments, costs, and behavior.
308 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 8 of 55
Treatment cost tables were provided by the City, to reflect its maintenance strategy, for each family designating PCI treatment ranges, costs and expected results for each identified treatment. (See Tables through )
A listing of the segments involved in future funded projects was provided by the city and are reflected in PAVER with a PCI of 100, for the year designated, affecting the PCI analysis results but not the scenario budgets. A given annual conventional budget of $3M/yr. was split between the roadway families by square yardage.
The following budget scenarios were constructed for each family of the City’s roadway network and its alternate network:
“Fix-All” Cost
Do Nothing Consequences (PCI at 5 years)
Given $3M Annual Budget Consequences
Annual Budgets to Maintain Existing PCI
Annual Budgets to Achieve a PCI of 72
Detailed Work Plans are provided in spreadsheet (See Appendix E )and GIS formats for the Given Budget scenarios.
The following graphics depict the projected PCI condition distribution, as designated by ASTM, as .
Figure ES-1 Distribution of Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collector Roads by PCI Range
309 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 9 of 55
Figure ES-2 Distribution of Asphalt Residential Roads by PCI Range
Figure ES-3 Distribution of Asphalt Alleys by PCI Range
310 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 10 of 55
Figure ES-4 –Historical PCI(Condition) Distribution of Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collector Roads
Figure ES-5 –Historical PCI(Condition) Distribution of Asphalt Residential Roads
311 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 11 of 55
Figure ES-6 –Historical PCI(Condition) Distribution of Asphalt Alleys
There are several explanations for the differences between the PCI’s of this report (2024) and the last (2020). First, is that the 2020 and prior inspections were done by sampling, a methodology outlined in the ASTM Standard D6433-11, mentioned earlier, used by most throughout the industry, as well as us in the past. It requires a subjective selection of a small sample area to represent an entire roadway segment length. A further source of inaccuracy is when these subjective decisions, regarding condition and sample location, are conducted by different inspectors with diverse levels of experience from inspection to inspection.
These issues can be summarized under the category of “Repeatability.” Repeatability (comparing apples to apples from year to year) is key for long-term performance monitoring of any variety, particularly in constructing representative behavior models. (See Appendix B for further discussion) In recent years, though, Transmap has developed an automated inspection method capable of inspecting and recording 100% of the traveled road. Our laser scanners survey and record every crack in the road surface on every road segment and compile this data into a representative PCI.
The result is not just a more accurate representation of the road condition it is, just as importantly, repeatable and non-subjective.
This can be a double-edged sword though. More accurate results will differ from previous surveys, for better or worse. The identical PCI difference of 7, between the 2024 and 2020 surveys for both the Main/Arterial/Collector and Residential road families and the extreme differences of the PCI’s for the concrete roads strongly suggest that this is what has occurred. Fortunately, in the case of the concrete paved roads, within the Main/Arterial/Collector and Residential families, they only make up 2% of your network.
312 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 12 of 55
1.0 All Pavements
The following are unit prices for (M&R) treatments obtained from discussions during the Boot Camp meeting and preceding correspondence with the City. Transmap translated the information and placed it into the appropriate M&R Category ranges shown in the table below. The column titled “Expected Result” reflects the expected extended life of the pavement as either experienced by the City or provided by the industry. These treatments and costs were applied uniformly throughout the roadway network.
Table 1. Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Treatments, PCI Ranges and Costs
Table 2. Residential Asphalt Roads - Treatments, PCI Ranges and Costs
M&R Category M&R TreatmentPrice per Square YardExpected ResultPreventative (PCI 91 - 100)Crack Seal $1.003 Year StabilizationGlobal (PCI 81 - 90)Slurry Seal $5.758 Year StabilizationGlobal (PCI 66 - 80)ARAM+Slurry (ARAM System 1)$20.008 Year StabilizationConventional (PCI 56 - 65)Grinding+ARHM+ Leveling Course (Overlay)$45.00 Reset PCI = 100Conventional (PCI 41- 55)Grinding+ARHM+ ARAM (ARAM System 3)$47.50 Reset PCI = 100Reconstruction (PCI 0 - 40)FDR $100.00 Reset PCI = 100M&R Category M&R TreatmentPrice per Square YardExpected ResultDo Nothing (PCI 86 - 100)N/A $0.00 N/APreventative (PCI 76 - 85)Crack Seal $1.003 Year StabilizationGlobal (PCI 66 - 75)Slurry Seal $5.758 Year StabilizationGlobal (PCI 61 - 65)ARAM+Slurry (ARAM System 1)$20.008 Year StabilizationConventional (PCI 46 - 60)Grinding+ARHM+ Leveling Course (Overlay)$45.00 Reset PCI = 100Conventional (PCI 31- 45)Grinding+ARHM+ ARAM (ARAM System 3)$47.50 Reset PCI = 100Reconstruction (PCI 0 - 30)FDR $100.00 Reset PCI = 100 313 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 13 of 55
Table 3. Asphalt Alleys - Treatments, PCI Ranges and Costs
Table 4. Concrete Pavements - Treatments, PCI Ranges and Costs
All costs above are roadway pavement treatment costs only and do not include any other improvements normally associated with a roadway project (such as MOT, accommodations for utilities, sidewalks, ADA ramps, etc.) which can often comprise on 60% of an overall project cost.
It is important to note that PAVER is designed to optimize the application of the treatments and determine a levelized budget based on treatment costs, the existing conditions, and the deterioration model. Its methodology is not a worst-first approach but instead assigns treatments in a manner that may not be intuitively obvious or operationally convenient, such as grouping roads together for letting.
For example, it often applies preventative treatments early on, letting many of the worst segments get worse of letting segments within range of needing only global treatments drift into requiring conventional treatment or reconstruction before addressing them. There are many other aspects to its logic that is not appropriate to address in this forum but suffice to say, it is the result of a compilation of many years of practical experience and study.
M&R Category M&R TreatmentPrice per Square YardExpected ResultDo Nothing (PCI 86 - 100)N/A $0.00 N/APreventative (PCI 76 - 85)Crack Seal $1.003 Year StabilizationGlobal (PCI 66 - 75)Slurry Seal $5.758 Year StabilizationGlobal (PCI 56 - 65)ARAM+Slurry (ARAM System 1)$20.008 Year StabilizationConventional (PCI 46 - 55)Grinding+ARHM+ Leveling Course (Overlay)$45.00 Reset PCI = 100Conventional (PCI 31- 45)Grinding+ARHM+ ARAM (ARAM System 3)$47.50 Reset PCI = 100Reconstruction (PCI 0 - 30)FDR $110.00 Reset PCI = 100M&R Category M&R TreatmentPrice per Square YardExpected ResultPreventative (PCI 51 - 100)Crack Sealing $1.003 Year StabilizationReconstruction (PCI 0-50)Slab Replacement $300.00 Reset PCI = 100 314 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 14 of 55
1.1 Road Characteristics
The table below illustrates the mileage distribution by surface type, number of miles, number of square yards, and the overall weighted average Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
Table 5. Distribution of All Roads by Pavement Type
The .12 Miles of Brick and .14 Miles of Unpaved roads and 7,635 SY of Parking Lot are not included within the remainder of this analysis.
Table 6. Distribution of Asphalt Roads by Functional Class
Pavement Type # of Sections # of CL Miles# of Square Yards% by # of Square YardsWeighted Average PCIAsphalt2,069 340.38 7,215,536 94.0% 65Brick1 0.12 2,984 0.0% 0Concrete83 10.06 155,632 2.0% 47Unpaved2 0.14 1,109 0.0% 0Alleys331 26.73 291,526 3.8% 78AC Parking Lots23 0 7,635 0.1% 52Total 2,509 377.43 7,674,422 100% 65Functional Class/Paver Designation# of Sections # of CL Miles# of Square Yards% by # of Square Yards2024 Weighted Average PCIA (Main) 105 32.63 1,338,720 17.8% 71B (Arterial)90 23.44 708,613 9.4% 65C (Collector)329 74.42 1,625,007 21.6% 67E (Local)1,545 209.89 3,543,196 47.2% 61Alleys331 26.73 291,526 3.9% 78Total 2,400 367.11 7,507,062 100.0% 65 315 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 15 of 55
Table 7. Distribution of Asphalt Roads by Functional Class and Surface Type
Because of condition disparity between the asphalt and concrete roads, their different maintenance treatment strategies, and their contrasting performance (deterioration model) all concrete roads were combined into a separate family in the following analyses.
Functional Class/Paver Designation# of Sections # of CL Miles# of Square Yards% by # of Square YardsWeighted Average PCI2020 Weighted Average PCIMain/Arterial/ Collectors (AC)524 130.49 3,672,340 47.9% 68 75Main/Arterial/ Collectors (PCC)7 1.02 18,273 0.2% 36 70Residential (AC)1,545 209.89 3,543,196 46.2% 61 68Residential (PCC)76 9.03 137,359 1.8% 49 70Alleys (AC)103 7.54 79,304 1.0% 60 48Alleys (PCC)228 19.19 212,222 2.8% 84 95Total 2,483 377.16 7,662,694 100% 65 72 316 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 16 of 55
Table 8. Distribution of Roads by Maintenance District
Maintenance District# of Sections # of CL Miles# of Square Yards% by # of Square Weighted Average PCI1116 19.27 508,138 7.0% 66261 10.65 165,592 2.3% 643185 32.43 732,755 10.2% 664114 17.09 304,444 4.2% 675155 26.9 485,437 6.7% 606303 43.03 842,532 11.7% 697245 36.60 755,317 10.5% 63885 17.55 454,056 6.3% 739272 46.51 1,017,418 14.1% 6310114 23.69 474,240 6.6% 6211105 17.31 448,036 6.2% 6012314 49.35 1,027,571 14.2% 64Totals 2,069 340.38 7,215,536 100.00% 65 317 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 17 of 55
2.0 Budget Scenario Details
The following subsections contain the scenarios for the city’s roadway network. The first are tables summarizing the cost if the City was to “fix all” present deficiencies at once. This is followed by various described scenarios tabularizing and graphically illustrating the annual Global and Major recommended budgets (excluding planned and funded projects) for 5-year periods, as determined by PAVER, and their resulting year-end PCI.
The last column sown in tables 13 through 28 is the deferred maintenance which consists of the cost of those treatments on section of road that fall below the Critical PCI and those above where PAVER has identified structural related deficiencies or where it has determined that there is enough remaining budget to address sections of roads that are close to dropping to a lower state of condition and would be advantageous to alleviate. Part of PAVER’s strategy is to begin by tackling those roads where preventative treatment does the best while letting major work go until later in the work plan.
Again, it is not a worst-first approach and can often appear counterintuitive.
2.1 Fix- All Costs
Table 9. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - “Fix All” Cost
M&R CategoryCenterline Miles SYPrice per Square YardTotalsPreventative (PCI 91 - 100)3.84 115,452 $1.00 $115,452Global (PCI 81 - 90)17.17 466,278 $5.75 $2,681,099Global (PCI 66 - 80)61.05 1,795,288 $20.00 $35,905,760Conventional (PCI 56 - 65)24.53 683,639 $45.00 $30,763,755Conventional (PCI 41- 55)17.64 459,989 $47.50 $21,849,478Reconstruction (PCI 0 - 40)6.26 151,694$100.00 $15,169,400Total 130.49 3,672,340 $106,484,943 318 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 18 of 55
Table 10. Local Asphalt Roads - “Fix All” Cost
Table 11. Asphalt Alleys - “Fix All” Cost
M&R CategoryCenterline Miles SYPrice per Square YardTotalsDo Nothing (PCI 85 - 100)13.36 234,062 $0.00 $0Preventative (PCI 75 - 85)29.09 499,008 $1.00 $499,008Global (PCI 65 - 75)47.83 813,419 $5.75 $4,677,159Global (PCI 60 - 65)23.08 388,037 $20.00 $7,760,740Conventional (PCI 45 - 60)51.31 852,706 $45.00 $38,371,770Conventional (PCI 30- 45)34.21 575,638 $47.50 $27,342,805Reconstruction (PCI 0 - 30)11.01 180,326$100.00 $18,032,600Total 209.89 3,543,196 $96,684,082M&R CategoryCenterline Miles SYPrice per Square YardTotalsDo Nothing (PCI 86 - 100)2.82 32,652 $0.00 $0Preventative (PCI 76 - 85)0.16 1,680 $1.00 $1,680Global (PCI 66 - 75)0.59 6,460 $5.75 $37,145Global (PCI 56 - 65)0.24 2,352 $20.00 $47,040Conventional (PCI 46 - 55)0.33 3,672 $45.00 $165,240Conventional (PCI 31- 45)0.84 8,415 $47.50 $399,713Reconstruction (PCI 0 - 30)2.56 24,073$110.00 $2,648,030Total 7.54 79,304 $3,298,848 319 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 19 of 55
Table 12. All Concrete Pavements - “Fix All” Cost
Total Network “Fix-All” Cost - $238.4M
SPECIAL NOTE:
As mentioned in the Executive Summary, PAVER accommodates future planned or funded projects.
The City provided a listing of funded projects which are accounted for in our analysis. The effect of these projects is reflected in PCI determinations throughout the plan horizon (2025 through 2029), but not in the cost tables. The costs for these projects are not accounted for in the tables, only the extra costs needed to accomplish the objective of the scenario. The funded project costs are also present within the Work Plans.
Below are the planned project costs, based on the individual treatment costs listed in the above Tables 1-4, divided into the pavement families:
Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads: Residential Asphalt Roads:
2025 – Global $20K-Conv. $11.8M 2025 - Global $209K-Conv. $8.9M 2026 - $1.5M 2026 - $0
2027 – $10.0M 2027 - $0
2028 – $24.8M 2028 - $7M
2029 - $0 2029 -
Asphalt Alleys: Concrete Pavement
2025 – $0 2025 - $225K
2026 - $0 2026 - $0
2027 – $0 2027 - $0
2028 – $101K 2028 - $364K
2029 - $0
EXAMPLE:
Note the following scenario “Arterial/Collector – Do Nothing Consequences” although no budget is allotted in the table throughout the 5-year planning period the PCI falls and rises in concert with the planned project costs.
M&R CategoryCenterline MilesSYPrice per Square YardTotalsPreventative (PCI 51 - 100)22.41 262,351 $1.00 $262,351Reconstruction (PCI 0-50)6.84 105,503 $300.00 $31,650,900Total29.25 367,854 $31,913,251 320 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 20 of 55
2.2 Do Nothing Consequences
Table 13. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Do Nothing Consequences
Figure 1. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Do Nothing Consequences
Year Beginning July 2025Annual Budget (Major)PCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 71 $49,800,000 2026$0 69 $61,200,000 2027$0 69 $74,000,000 2028$0 70 $88,200,000 2029$0 67 $101,600,000 321 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 21 of 55
Table 14. Residential Asphalt Roads - Do Nothing Consequences
Figure 2. Residential Asphalt Roads - Do Nothing Consequences
Year Beginning July 2025Annual Budget (Major)PCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 64 $73,200,000 2026$0 60 $89,200,000 2027$0 57 $112,900,000 2028$0 55 $135,700,000 2029$0 52 $162,300,000 322 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 22 of 55
Table 15. Asphalt Alleys - Do Nothing Consequences
Figure 3. Asphalt Alleys - Do Nothing Consequences
Year Beginning July 2025Annual Budget (Major)PCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 60 $3,100,000 2026$0 56 $3,600,000 2027$0 52 $4,100,000 2028$0 49 $4,400,000 2029$0 46 $4,800,000 323 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 23 of 55
Table 16. Concrete Pavements - Do Nothing Consequences
Figure 4. Concrete Pavements - Do Nothing Consequences
Overall Do-Nothing Consequence - Network PCI 60
Year Beginning July 2025Annual Budget (Major)PCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 70 $29,700,000 2026$0 68 $32,400,000 2027$0 66 $35,200,000 2028$0 66 $36,400,000 2029$0 64 $39,300,000 324 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 24 of 55
2.3 Given Budget Consequences
The following scenarios are based on the City’s annual $3M budget. The budget was split between the Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collector, Residential, Alleys and Concrete Pavements by square yardage (47.93%, 46.23%, 4.8% and 1.03% respectively).
Table 17. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Given $1.438M Annual Budget
Figure 5. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Given $1.438M Annual Budget
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$1,438,000 $0 71 $48,300,000 2026$1,438,000 $0 69 $58,300,000 2027$1,438,000 $0 70 $69,500,000 2028$1,438,000 $0 71 $82,300,000 2029$693,000 $745,000 69 $93,400,000 325 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 25 of 55
Table 18. Residential Asphalt Roads – Given $1.387M Annual Budgets
Figure 6. Residential Asphalt Roads – Given $1.387M Annual Budgets
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$1,387,000 $0 64 $71,800,000 2026$1,320,000 $67,000 61 $86,300,000 2027$173,000 $1,214,000 58 $108,600,000 2028$220,000 $1,167,000 57 $129,700,000 2029$512,000 $875,000 54 $153,500,000 326 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 26 of 55
Table 19. Asphalt Alleys – Given $31K Annual Budgets
Figure 7. Asphalt Alleys – Given $31K Annual Budgets
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$21,000 $0 61 $3,100,000 2026$0 $28,000 56 $3,500,000 2027$4,000 $18,000 53 $4,000,000 2028$0 $26,000 50 $4,300,000 2029$0 $24,000 48 $4,500,000 327 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 27 of 55
Table 20. Concrete Pavements – Given $144K Annual Budgets
Figure 8. Concrete Pavements – Given $144K Annual Budgets
Overall Given $3M Annual Budget Consequence - Network PCI 62
Year Beginning July 2025Preventative Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 $100,000 70 $29,600,000 2026$0 $80,000 68 $32,000,000 2027$0 $90,000 66 $34,900,000 2028$0 $121,000 66 $36,000,000 2029$0 $124,000 64 $38,700,000 328 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 28 of 55
2.4 Annual Budgets to Maintain Existing PCI (Condition) Table 21. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – $933K Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 68
Figure 9. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – $933K Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 68
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$933,000 $0 71 $48,800,000 2026$933,000 $0 69 $59,300,000 2027$933,000 $0 70 $71,000,000 2028$933,000 $0 70 $84,400,000 2029$933,000 $0 68 $96,200,000 329 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 29 of 55
Table 22. Residential Asphalt Roads – Avg $7.07M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 61
Figure 10. Residential Asphalt Roads – Avg $7.07M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 61
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$2,556,000 $4,518,000 66 $66,100,000 2026$116,000 $6,952,000 64 $74,800,000 2027$173,000 $6,897,000 63 $91,000,000 2028$220,000 $6,849,000 63 $105,900,000 2029$512,000 $6,555,000 61 $123,100,000 330 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 30 of 55
Table 23. Asphalt Alleys – Avg. $191K Annual Budgets to Maintain PCI of 60
Figure 11. Asphalt Alleys – Avg. $191K Annual Budgets to Maintain PCI of 60
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$21,000 $177,000 63 $2,900,000 2026$0 $193,000 62 $3,200,000 2027$4,000 $192,000 60 $3,300,000 2028$0 $185,000 60 $3,200,000 2029$0 $184,000 60 $3,200,000 331 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 31 of 55
Table 24. Concrete Pavements – Avg $1.526M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 69
Figure 12. Concrete Pavements – Avg $1.526M Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 69
Overall Total to Maintain Existing Network PCIs - $9.72M
Final Network PCI - 65
Year Beginning July 2025Preventative Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 $1,473,000 70 $28,200,000 2026$0 $1,502,000 69 $29,400,000 2027$0 $1,457,000 69 $30,600,000 2028$0 $1,750,000 69 $30,200,000 2029$0 $1,448,000 69 $31,400,000 332 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 32 of 55
2.5 Annual Budget to Achieve Network PCI of 72
Table 25. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads – Avg. $4.808M Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Figure 13. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Avg. $4.808M Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$4,825,000 $0 72 $44,900,000 2026$1,080,000 $3,743,000 71 $51,400,000 2027$88,400 $4,712,000 72 $59,100,000 2028$252,000 $4,522,000 74 $68,300,000 2029$135,000 $4,683,000 72 $75,600,000 333 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 33 of 55
Table 26. Residential Asphalt Roads – $14.46M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Figure 14. Residential Asphalt Roads – $14.46M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$2,556,000 $11,907,000 68 $58,700,000 2026$116,000 $14,345,000 68 $59,800,000 2027$173,000 $14,291,000 69 $68,100,000 2028$220,000 $14,238,000 71 $74,500,000 2029$512,000 $13,940,000 72 $83,000,000 334 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 34 of 55
Table 27. Asphalt Alleys – Avg $398K Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Figure 15. Asphalt Alleys – Avg $398K Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Year Beginning July 2025Global Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$21,000 $387,000 66 $2,700,000 2026$0 $401,000 66 $2,700,000 2027$4,000 $388,000 67 $2,500,000 2028$0 $383,000 70 $2,300,000 2029$0 $406,000 72 $2,000,000 335 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 35 of 55
Table 28. Concrete Pavements – Avg $2.598M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Figure 16. Concrete Pavements – Avg $2.598M Annual Budget to Achieve PCI of 72
Overall Total to Maintain Existing Network PCIs - $22.3M
Final Network PCI - 72
Year Beginning July 2025Preventative Treatment BudgetConventional Treatment BudgetPCI at Year End Deferred Maint.2025$0 $2,498,000 71 $27,200,000 2026$0 $2,566,000 71 $27,300,000 2027$0 $2,574,000 71 $27,300,000 2028$0 $2,790,000 72 $25,800,000 2029$0 $2,564,000 72 $25,800,000 336 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 36 of 55
2.6 Scenarios Summary
Table 29. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary
Figure 17. Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary
Year Beginning July 2025Do NothingGiven $1.438M Budget$933K Budget to Maintain PCI 68Avg. $4.808M Budget to Achieve PCI 72202571 71 71 72202669 69 69 71202769 70 70 72202870 71 70 74202967 69 68 72 337 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 37 of 55
Table 30. Residential Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary
Figure 18. Residential Asphalt Roads - Scenarios Summary
Year Beginning July 2025Do Nothing BudgetGiven $1.387M BudgetAvg. $7.07M Budget to Maintain PCI 61Avg. $14.46M Budget to Achieve PCI 72202564 64 66 68202660 61 64 68202757 58 63 69202855 57 63 71202952 54 61 72 338 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 38 of 55
Table 31. Asphalt Alleys - Scenarios Summary
Figure 19. Asphalt Alleys - Scenarios Summary
Year Beginning July 2025Do Nothing BudgetGiven $31K BudgetAvg. $191K Budget to Maintain PCI 60Avg. $398K Budget to Achieve PCI 72202560 61 63 66202656 56 62 66202752 53 60 67202849 50 60 70202946 48 60 72 339 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 39 of 55
Table 32. Concrete Pavements - Scenarios Summary
Figure 20. Concrete Pavements - Scenarios Summary
Year Beginning July 2025Do Nothing BudgetGiven $144K BudgetAvg. $1.526M Budget to Maintain PCI 69Avg. $2.598M Budget to Achieve PCI 72202570 70 70 71202668 68 69 71202766 66 69 71202866 66 69 72202964 64 69 72 340 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 40 of 55
Appendix A – Boot Camp Meeting Notes
Meeting Description
Glendale, CA
Pavement Management Boot Camp Meeting Notes
Objective Summary of Boot Camp Meeting Discussion
Location Teams Meeting
Date August 14, 2024
Time 10:00 AM PT
Persons Attended – Glendale, CA Persons Attended - Transmap Armen Avazian, Engineering Manager
[email protected]
Rustom Tavitian
[email protected]
Viktoriya Pakhanyan
[email protected]
Chris Crocker, Operations Manager
[email protected]
740-835-1223
Rob Little
Senior Reporting Engineer
[email protected]
813-390-2565
Data Requests
City to provide maintenance history, work scheduled up to Start Date, and work planned beyond as future projects.
The city will update treatment costs
City to determine if it wants scenario(s) for or to exclude specific zones 341 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 41 of 55
August 14, 2024, Boot Camp Meeting Notes:
Chris Crocker, and Rob Little chaired the Meeting. Chris introduced the Transmap Staff and provided an overview of the project.
Chris reviewed Project Report deliverables, including Crack Intel reports. Reviewed Slicer webpage and its elements. (Centerline, LCMS Crack Heat Map, PCI Map, Van Images, Crack Heat Map, True Area, Demo of roadside asset collection). Reviewed the capabilities of the Transmap Data Collection Vehicle. ASTM standards for determining PCI.
City would like explanation in the report as to why the network PCI dropped from 72 to 66. (Rising M&R Costs, Annual budget spent, Specifics of what the budget was spent on, etc.) Transmap will identify crack seal and slab replacement sections from 2020 work plan and update work history in PAVER accordingly.
Based on information from the City Transmap can exclude certain maintenance zones from work plans, if need be.
The City noted that some survey photos did not seem to match the PCI readings. Transmap will review and update PCI, as needed.
There was particular concern regarding the Alley PCI’s on those alleys that have concrete gutter pans on asphalt streets. Transmap will review and adjust as needed. The city will provide maintenance history, work scheduled up to Start Date, and work planned beyond as future projects, in GIS form.
Future projects will not affect Given budget.
Given budget will remain $3M, divided between families in same manner as 2021 report. Rob moderated collecting Paver parameters after reviewing existing conditions. o The city has 12 maintenance zones that will be identified in work plans but there might be a need to see PCI or work plans for a specific zone or zones. o Roads will be split into four families (Arterial/Collector, Residential, Alleys and Parking lots)
o A listing of PCI results for each Parking lot will be included in report. o Transmap will review individual performance models for each family and modify as needed.
o Critical PCI will be Determined as function of model. o Project horizon will be 5 years with a start date of July 1, 2025. o Treatment cost tables will be updated by City. (See treatment cost tables next page) o Scenarios will consist of:
Fix-All
Do Nothing
Given budget consequences
Budget to Maintain PCI
Budgets to Achieve PCI 72
o City requested report to be in Word format.
o City requested that Transmap be present for Council presentation
342 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 42 of 55
Treatment cost tables
Main/Arterial/Collector Asphalt Roads
Residential Asphalt Roads
343 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 43 of 55
Asphalt Alleys
Concrete Roads
344 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 44 of 55
Appendix B – Parking Lot Conditions
Lot ID Zone SY PCIG10 3 777 74G15 8 198 43G2 3 181 54G3 3 135 56G30 7 299 62G31 7 269 34G32 6 542 39G33 6 765 35G34 6 196 44G35 6 482 17G4 3 174 63G6 8 208 47G7 3 202 50GTC1 1 421 84GTC2 1 292 82M1 6 184 47M2 6 183 66M3 6 244 50M4 6 200 54M5 6 208 38M6 6 202 47M7 6 276 37P&R 9 997 64 345 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 45 of 55
Appendix C - Pavement Performance Curves
The predictive modeling (family modeling) process groups pavements of similar construction that are subjected to similar traffic loads, weather, and other factors that affect pavement life. The historical data on pavement conditions can be used to build a model which can predict the future performance of a group of pavements with similar attributes. In PAVER, this model of a pavement’s life is referred to as a “family.”
The performance curve plays a key role in the development of network-level budget analysis. If the deterioration rate of the curve is too steep, the required budget to repair these pavements will increase. If the deterioration rate of the curve is too flat, the required budget to repair these pavements will be too small. Both situations are erroneous, but when analyzing over a brief period, like 5 years, the change at any point over that period needs only be close initially. Constructing models that can accurately predict the performance of any road is an iterative process that is refined from the results of multiple condition surveys. Historical maintenance data are useful but can be initially misleading because they will contain many outliers particularly if the data are not being collected specifically for this purpose.
Figure A-1 below shows the results from the asphalt performance model developed for the City’s Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collectors, Residential Roads & Alleys, and Concrete Pavements.
Figure C.1. Main/Arterial/Collector AC Roads - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
346 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 46 of 55
Figure C.2. Residential AC Roads - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
Figure C.3. Asphalt Alleys - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
347 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 47 of 55
Figure C.4. Concrete Pavements - Pavement Performance Curve as translated by PAVER and its polynomial.
348 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 48 of 55
Appendix D - Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Formula
Step 1: In a Network Level PMS, a survey of a limited number of sample units per section is sufficient. A sample area is defined as an area of 2,500 square feet plus or minus 1,000. A section is viewed as the smallest management unit when considering the application and selection of maintenance and repair (M&R) treatments.
Step 3: Using customer-defined constraints, such as the desired level of service, available rehabilitation technologies, or budgets, paving plans are developed in the Pavement Management System.
349 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 49 of 55
Appendix E - Principles of Pavement Management
Given the persistent shortage of funding for maintaining street systems, the most efficient means of maximizing the return on investment for road maintenance is to implement a Pavement Management System.
Pavement management is a systematic approach to maximizing the life of a pavement network while optimizing the use of constrained funding encompassing planning, budgeting, funding, designing, constructing, monitoring, evaluating, maintaining, rehabilitating, and reconstructing a pavement network.
A Pavement Management System assists in finding and implementing the best Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) strategies. Intuitively, we know that repairing streets when they are still in fair condition costs less over their lifetime than waiting to fix roads that have fallen into poor condition and extensive research over the years has proven this to be true. A proactive approach to routine pavement management means less money wasted on roadway reconstruction and potential savings of millions of dollars.
This process is illustrated below. It details how timely intervention can delay the inevitable total reconstruction for as long as practical. If repairs are delayed until a road is rated in “Fair” condition or worse, the cost of rehabilitation becomes 4 to 5 times more expensive than for those roads in “Good” condition. This means without preventative pavement maintenance; the cost of rehabilitation will be prohibitively expensive.
350 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 50 of 55
A Pavement Management System also provides a way to store an accurate inventory of all roadways, enriched with links to easements, as-built records, and historical documentation. The breadth and depth of information they hold, including digital images of roadways, baseline pavement condition data, and reviews of deterioration over time, are invaluable resources for measuring and tracking the effectiveness of Maintenance and Rehabilitation strategies.
Successful pavement management system programs let agency decision-makers develop reliable performance models for the roadway, which can be used to generate sound policies and long-term rehabilitation strategies, budgets, and timetables.
Another compelling reason for implementing a Pavement Management System is the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 34. This regulation requires agencies that collect taxes to manage a long-term, fixed infrastructure asset to either:
Option #1 - Implement financial accounting controls to effectively depreciate and plan for the replacement of fixed assets.
Option #2 - Implement an asset management system that provides a mechanism to gauge and budget for the long-term rehabilitation and/or maintenance of assets.
This study completed on the roadway network can be used as the basis for achieving GASB 34** compliance, either as the foundation for the inventory and valuation of the network (Option #1) or as the foundation of an asset management system (Option #2). **Although it is not required to meet GASB 34 standards, it is recommended to follow the industry’s best practices regarding monitoring their infrastructure.
The Pavement Management Process
The figure below depicts the three unique, but equally important, steps that comprise the Pavement Management Process.
System Configuration
Field Data Collection
Analysis and Reporting
Red - Not driven Yellow - Driven one way Green - Driven All lanes – 100% analysis
351 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 51 of 55
1. System Configuration
System configuration involves identifying all roadways of the project network and assigning them a unique identifier. Each section has attributes such as physical characteristics (length, width, etc.), pavement type, and road classification. As part of system configuration, the network is linked to a GIS map. This map is loaded into our web-based mapping system.
2. Field Data Collection
After system configuration is completed, every roadway and all lanes in the system are surveyed and its condition is assessed using the following criteria:
Surface Distress
We use a Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS4m) 3D pavement imaging technology. Pavement surface distresses, including alligator cracking, block cracking, rutting, raveling, reflective cracking, loss of section, bleeding, edge distress, and patched areas, as well as right of way (ROW) imagery will be collected on a segment-by-segment basis, with each distress captured by type, extent, and severity.
Table 1, with respect to the pavement type (AC=Asphalt Pavement and PCC=Portland Cement Concrete).
Description of Surface Distresses Recorded by Transmap
Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Pavement
Alligator Cracking
Block Cracking
Bleeding
Edge Cracking
Transverse and Longitudinal Cracking
Patching and Utility Cut Patching
Potholes
Rutting
Weathering
Raveling
Bumps and Sags, Corrugations and
Depressions
Pavement Distresses for Concrete Pavement
Divided Slabs
Linear Cracking
Corner Breaks
Durability (“D”) Cracking
Faulting
Joint Seal Damage
Pop Outs
Pumping
Scaling or Map Cracking
Shrinkage Cracking
Corner or Joint Spalling
Small or Large Patching
Detailed descriptions of pavement distress and severity can be found in ASTM D6433-11.
Severity
Once distress has been identified, its severity (Low, Moderate, High) is attached to the appropriate record and its count, e.g., the number of potholes, square footage (area covered by cracking), or linear feet (length of a specific crack) are added as well.
In a Network Level PMS, a survey of a limited number of sample units per section is sufficient. A sample area is defined as an area of 2,500 square feet plus or minus 1,000. A section is viewed as 352 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 52 of 55
the smallest management unit when considering the application and selection of maintenance and repair (M&R) treatments. All field survey data collected in samples are summarized on a section-by- section basis. Each section constitutes a unit of data to populate the Pavement Management System.
Other data collected during field surveys include the pavement width, the pavement type, GPS coordinates, and digital images.
3. Analysis and Reporting
The results of a Pavement Management System analysis provide a quantitative performance score called Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is an engineering terminology representing the surface condition of the pavement on a scale of 0 to 100. For example:
PCI of 100 is a pavement in perfect condition.
PCI of 0 is a pavement that is destroyed.
The PCI is a distress-based condition index, i.e., specific distresses in the pavement are identified and tallied, and the type, severity, and extent of each distress are used to calculate a single number representing the pavement condition. The higher numbers reflect better pavement. The formula used to calculate the PCIs is in Appendix B.
All condition ratings of the field surveys are captured at sample areas and combined to calculate one value, which represents the PCI of a pavement section using the area weighted average.
Understanding the Pavement Condition Index
The following illustration shows how the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) deteriorates over time for three different types of roadways. It also compares the PCIs to commonly used descriptive terms (Good, Satisfactory, Fair, Poor, Very Poor, Serious, Failed). The divisions between the descriptive terms are not fixed but are meant to indicate common perceptions of roadway conditions. 353 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 53 of 55
An industry-standard defines the different PCI condition levels with respect to the remaining life of a pavement and typical rehabilitation options recommended.
Industry Standard for PCI Condition Levels
PCI Range Work Type Rehabilitation Options
86-100
Good Rejuvenation
Little or no maintenance
E.g., Crack Seal,
Reclimite, fog seal
71-85
Satisfactory Global
Routine Maintenance,
e.g., Seals such as slurry
seal
56-70
Fair Critical Non-structural overlay,
cape seal
41-55
Poor Conventional Structural Overlay
Overlay or Mill & overlay
26-40
Very Poor Conventional Structural Overlay
Overlay or Mill & overlay
11-25
Serious Reconstruction Reconstruction, rebuild,
full depth reclamation
0-10
Failed Reconstruction Reconstruction, rebuild,
full depth reclamation
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Planning
Key Analysis Inputs
All Pavement Management Systems require user input to establish budget estimates and pavement Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) plans. During the Boot Camp, decisions were made that affected the pavement rehabilitation program in a variety of ways. The key inputs are:
The M&R pavement preservation categories
The M&R pavement treatment type
The PCI ranges are assigned to the M&R categories.
The Critical PCI
Unit cost for each pavement treatment type
Expected life of the treatment type
Agency budget and length of the planning period
Budget required to achieve a target PCI at the end of the planning period. Desired deferred maintenance at the end of the planning period
354 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 54 of 55
Pavement Preservation
The figure below represents the American Public Works Association (APWA) industry-standard pavement preservation curve.
Pavement Preservation
The figure below represents APWA’s Pavement Toolbox. This toolbox looks at preservation treatments and how they are cost-effective to use as opposed to spending all funding on worst-first maintenance (rehabilitation/reconstruction).
Preservation Treatments
This hierarchical strategy ensures that roadways slated for reconstruction remain in the reconstruction pipeline even if there is a funding shortfall. Available funds are used to preserve those streets that can be treated with slurries and overlays. No real equity is lost when those roads become unacceptable for use since they were already scheduled for reconstruction.
355 of 383
Transmap Corporation: Glendale, CA Report Page 55 of 55
Appendix F – Work Plans
The following work plans were produced for the City of Glendale and contain the recommended Global, M&R and the funded project costs:
Asphalt Main/Arterial/Collectors – Given $1.438M Annual Budget
Asphalt Residential Roads – Given $1.387M Annual Budget
Asphalt Alleys – Given $31K Annual Budget
Concrete Pavements – Given $144K Annual Budget
356 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
ALLEN AVE A0041 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD SOUTH END 11 72.63 77.91 2025 $19,775.35 $19,775.35 ALLEN AVE A0042 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BL 10 62.97 100.00 2025 $0.00 $190,246.97 BRAND BLVD N A0549 N/S LEXINGTON DR S/S 134 FWY 8 76.64 82.72 2025 $118,970.19 $118,970.19 CANADA BLVD A0668 N/S CAPISTRANO AVE N/S GLORIETTA AVE 6 74.66 80.33 2025 $66,344.93 $66,344.93 CANADA BLVD A0667 N/S COLINA DR N/S CAPISTRANO AVE 6 71.53 76.62 2025 $95,596.76 $95,596.76 CENTRAL AVE N A0711B S/S GLENOAKS BLVD N/S 134 HWY 9 80.98 87.91 2025 $4,936.32 $4,936.32 CERRITOS AVE W A0721 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S BRAND BLVD 1 76.27 82.28 2025 $13,214.71 $13,214.71 CERRITOS AVE W A0723 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S SAN FERNANDO RD 1 76.18 82.17 2025 $18,879.35 $18,879.35 COLORADO ST E A0798 EAST CITY LIMIT E/S VERDUGO RD 3 77.18 83.38 2025 $71,327.33 $71,327.33 COLORADO ST E A0796 E/S GLENDALE AVE E/S ADAMS ST 3 76.46 82.51 2025 $89,489.89 $89,489.89 COLORADO ST E A0797 E/S VERDUGO RD E/S ADAMS ST 3 76.55 82.62 2025 $92,840.92 $92,840.92 COUNTRY CLUB DR A0856 S/S SAN GABRIEL AVE W/S CANADA BLVD 6 55.28 100.00 2025 $0.00 $294,930.24 E GLENOAKS BLVD A1224 E/S BRAND BLVD W/S CENTRAL AVE 9 77.36 83.59 2025 $118,597.71 $118,597.71 E CHEVY CHASE DR A0764 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 1 71.62 76.72 2025 $28,088.31 $28,088.31 FAIRMONT AVE A1071 W/S CONCORD ST E/S SAN FERNANDO RD 9 77.45 83.70 2025 $61,203.18 $61,203.18 FOOTHILL BLVD A1112 E/S DUNSMORE AVE E/S BOSTON AVE 12 70.31 75.21 2025 $80,190.69 $80,190.69 GLORIETTA AVE A1247 W/S BRIDGE E/S RUSTIC LN 6 75.65 81.53 2025 $2,744.96 $2,744.96 HARVEY DR A1310 N/S WILSON AVE N/S HOLLY DR 3 75.64 81.52 2025 $64,620.13 $64,620.13 JACKSON ST N A1442 S/S DORAN ST N/S LEXINGTON DR 7 82.34 89.49 2025 $6,457.60 $6,457.60 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1518 S/S SYCAMORE AVE S/S HONOLULU AVE 12 65.76 100.00 2025 $0.00 $301,847.48 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1519 S/S SYCAMORE AVE N/S GLENWOOD AVE 12 59.54 100.00 2025 $0.00 $375,017.91 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1523 W/S VERDUGO RD N/S LA PALMAS AVE 6 61.56 100.00 2025 $0.00 $797,808.80 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1522 N/S LAS PALMAS AVE N/S ROSELAWN AVE 6 64.71 100.00 2025 $0.00 $831,316.55 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1520 N/S OAKMONT VIEW DR N/S GLENWOOD AVE 12 56.11 100.00 2025 $0.00 $878,711.79 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1521 N/S ROSELAWN AVE N/S OAK MONTVIEW DR 6 63.64 100.00 2025 $0.00 $956,459.54 LA CRESCENTA AVE A1517 N/S HONOLULU AVE S/S MONTROSE AVE 12 38.33 100.00 2025 $0.00 $1,099,156.33 LOS FELIZ RD E A1612 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S BRAND BLVD 1 62.66 100.00 2025 $0.00 $237,825.21 LOS FELIZ RD W A1615 W/S SAN FERNANDO RD WEST CITY LIMITS 1 77.45 83.71 2025 $36,798.71 $36,798.71 LOS FELIZ RD W A1613 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 1 61.66 100.00 2025 $0.00 $315,775.28 MOUNTAIN ST W A1792A S/S VERDUGO RD W/S 2 FWY 5 79.16 85.74 2025 $18,382.71 $18,382.71 N GLENDALE AVE A1192 N/S BROADWAY N/S COLORADO BLVD 3 77.72 84.02 2025 $68,217.57 $68,217.57 N GLENDALE AVE A1196 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD N/S LOS FELIZ RD 2 76.54 82.61 2025 $77,075.81 $77,075.81 PACIFIC AVE S A1893 N/S COLORADO ST S/S BROADWAY 8 77.01 83.17 2025 $61,080.30 $61,080.30 SAN FERNANDO RD A2118 S/S LOS FELIZ RD N/S CHEVY CHASE DR 1 74.18 79.76 2025 $82,272.61 $82,272.61 Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan 357 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan SAN FERNANDO RD A2119 N/S LOS FELIZ RD N/S BRAND BLVD 1 76.90 83.04 2025 $92,414.68 $92,414.68 SAN FERNANDO RD A2111 E/S SONORA AVE W/S WESTERN AVE 11 45.52 100.00 2025 $0.00 $508,354.67 SAN FERNANDO RD A2112 E/S CLEVELAND AVE E/S SONORA AVE 11 56.08 100.00 2025 $0.00 $764,871.88 SAN FERNANDO RD A2110 W/S WESTERN AVE W/S SPAZIER AVE 11 52.25 100.00 2025 $0.00 $889,438.86 VERDUGO RD N A2358 N/S COLORADO ST S/S BROADWAY 3 77.44 83.69 2025 $43,986.54 $43,986.54 VERDUGO RD N A2359 N/S ACACIA AVE S/S COLORADO ST 3 57.92 100.00 2025 $0.00 $1,457,064.85 VICTORY BLVD A2372 W/S SONORA AVE W/S WESTERN AVE 11 56.90 100.00 2025 $0.00 $455,248.89 VICTORY BLVD A2371 W/S WESTERN AVE WEST CITY LIMITS 11 56.32 100.00 2025 $0.00 $676,847.09 WESTERN AVE A2410 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 51.91 100.00 2025 $0.00 $368,694.42 WESTERN AVE A2411 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S FLOWER ST 11 54.93 100.00 2025 $0.00 $384,009.04 WILSON TER A2443 E/S SAN FERNANDO RD W/S CONCORD ST 8 79.63 86.31 2025 $9,002.88 $9,002.88 WILSON TER A2435 W/S CHEVY CHASE DR E/S ADAMS ST 3 77.73 84.03 2025 $13,425.27 $13,425.27 2025 Totals $1,455,935 $13,239,561
358 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan BROADWAY E A0576 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S PACIFIC AVE 8 93.22 93.22 2026 $11,063.80 $11,063.80 CENTRAL AVE N A0715 W/S SAN FERNANDO RD W/S RAILROAD ST 1 78.93 85.48 2026 $21,911.80 $21,911.80 CENTRAL AVE N A0709 N/S BROADWAY N/S LEXINGTON DR 8 80.13 86.91 2026 $79,219.33 $79,219.33 COLORADO ST E A0799 W/S PACIFIC AVE E/S SAN FERNANDO RD 8 79.71 86.41 2026 $57,061.65 $57,061.65 COLORADO ST E A0800 W/S CENTRAL AVE W/S PACIFIC AVE 8 79.89 86.61 2026 $100,420.51 $100,420.51 E GLENOAKS BLVD A1220 E/S WESTERN AVE E/S ALAMEDA AVE 10 76.38 82.41 2026 $229,721.22 $229,721.22 E GLENOAKS BLVD A1221 E/S GRANDVIEW AVE E/S WESTERN AVE 10 76.71 82.81 2026 $246,778.02 $246,778.02 N GLENDALE AVE A1193 N/S MAPLE ST S/S COLORADO ST 3 79.95 86.69 2026 $51,825.62 $51,825.62 N GLENDALE AVE A1195 N/S LOS FELIZ RD N/S CHEVY CHASE DR 2 76.29 82.30 2026 $63,916.01 $63,916.01 N GLENDALE AVE A1194 N/S CHEVY CHASE DR N/S MAPLE ST 3 79.78 86.49 2026 $73,347.18 $73,347.18 N GLENDALE AVE A5053 MONTEREY RD VENTURA FWY RAMP 7 79.01 100.00 2026 $0.00 $178,289.37 N GLENDALE AVE A1191 N/S BROADWAY 134 RAMPS 3 68.12 100.00 2026 $0.00 $1,320,530.25 PACIFIC AVE S A1892 S/S BROADWAY 134 RAMPS 8 78.93 85.48 2026 $128,215.67 $128,215.67 PENNSYLVANIA AVE A1948 S/S FOOTHILL BLVD S/S ENCINAL AVE 12 79.61 86.28 2026 $79,597.05 $79,597.05 PENNSYLVANIA AVE A1945 N/S FOOTHILL BLVD N/S ORANGE AVE 12 80.64 87.50 2026 $80,318.22 $80,318.22 SAN FERNANDO RD A2120 N/S BRAND BLVD CITY LIMITS 1 76.89 83.02 2026 $73,691.94 $73,691.94 VERDUGO RD N A2349 N/S BROADWAY N/S WILSON AVE 3 79.36 85.99 2026 $24,255.91 $24,255.91 VERDUGO RD N A2348 N/S WILSON AVE S/S CHEVY CHASE DR 3 79.36 85.99 2026 $40,757.66 $40,757.66 WILSON TER A2434 E/S ADAMS ST E/S GLENDALE AVE 3 78.00 84.36 2026 $27,734.51 $27,734.51 WILSON TER A2442 E/S CONCORD ST W/S PACIFIC AVE 8 79.03 85.59 2026 $47,408.99 $47,408.99 2026 Totals $1,437,245 $2,936,065
359 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan ADAMS ST S A0019 S/S PALMER AVE CITY LIMITS 2 70.78 75.74 2027 $59,461.98 $59,461.98 ALLEN AVE A0046 N/S BEL AIRE DR S/S MOUNTAIN ST 10 69.05 73.80 2027 $36,485.44 $36,485.44 BEAUDRY TER A0500 W/S DORA VERDUGO DR S/S GREENMONT DR 6 72.42 77.66 2027 $24,016.73 $24,016.73 BEL AIRE DR A0504 W/S GRANDVIEW AVE E/S WESTERN AVE 10 69.07 73.83 2027 $32,242.52 $32,242.52 BEL AIRE DR A0502 E/S IRVING AVE E/S ALAMEDA AVE 10 73.25 78.64 2027 $39,700.39 $39,700.39 BOSTON AVE A0538 S/S SANTA CARLOTTA ST N/S FOOTHILL BLVD 12 71.69 76.79 2027 $69,304.41 $69,304.41 BRAND BLVD N A0553 W/S SAN FERNANDO RD CITY LIMITS 1 79.43 86.07 2027 $80,730.22 $80,730.22 BROADVIEW DR A0568 E/S OCEAN VIEW BLVD W/S VERDUGO RD 6 71.71 76.82 2027 $15,455.52 $15,455.52 BROADVIEW DR A0566 E/S LAS PALMAS AVE E/S ROSELAWN AVE 6 68.44 73.14 2027 $22,787.78 $22,787.78 BROADVIEW DR A0567 W/S OCEAN VIEW BLVD E/S LAS PALMAS AVE 6 67.05 71.68 2027 $30,248.37 $30,248.37 CENTRAL AVE N A0713 S/S RANDOLPH ST N/S STOCKER ST 9 83.46 90.77 2027 $15,213.13 $15,213.13 CENTRAL AVE N A0711A S/S GLENOAKS BLVD N/S 134 HWY 9 78.79 85.30 2027 $53,408.91 $53,408.91 CENTRAL AVE N A0710 N/S LEXINGTON DR N/S SANCHEZ DR 9 78.95 85.49 2027 $73,156.92 $73,156.92 CENTRAL AVE N A0716 E/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S LOS FELIZ RD 1 64.34 100.00 2027 $0.00 $286,493.01 CENTRAL AVE N A0719 S/S RIVERDALE DR S/S COLORADO BLVD 1 58.12 100.00 2027 $0.00 $465,899.62 CENTRAL AVE N A0717 S/S LOS FELIZ RD N/S CHEVY CHASE DR 1 61.14 100.00 2027 $0.00 $589,402.07 CENTRAL AVE N A0718 N/S CHEVY CHASE DR S/S RIVERDALE DR 1 58.25 100.00 2027 $0.00 $643,614.56 CERRITOS AVE W A0722 W/S SAN FERNANDO RD E/S GARDENA AVE 1 82.44 89.60 2027 $19,297.85 $19,297.85 E CHEVY CHASE DR A0746 E/S LILAC LN W/S CHEVY OAKS DR 5 69.42 74.21 2027 $31,966.18 $31,966.18 E CHEVY CHASE DR A0754 N/S LINDA VISTA DR N/S SUSSEX CT 5 69.59 74.40 2027 $43,066.07 $43,066.07 FAIRMONT AVE A5035 SAN FERNANDO RD VENTURA FWY ENTRANCE RAMP 9 80.18 86.95 2027 $48,665.59 $48,665.59 GARDENA AVE A1146 S/S CENTRAL AVE SOUTH END 1 80.42 87.24 2027 $38,078.32 $38,078.32 GOODE AVE A1252 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 9 78.70 85.19 2027 $23,717.30 $23,717.30 KENNETH RD W A1481 E/S ALAMEDA AVE CITY LIMITS 10 78.94 85.48 2027 $6,258.12 $6,258.12 LEXINGTON DR E A1566 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 8 73.00 78.34 2027 $18,916.94 $18,916.94 MONTEREY RD A1765 W/S GLENDALE AVE W/S BALBOA AVE 7 79.04 85.60 2027 $40,928.66 $40,928.66 MONTROSE AVE A1774 W/S LA CRESCENTA AVE W/S RAMSDELL AVE 12 70.28 75.17 2027 $78,672.24 $78,672.24 MONTROSE AVE A1776 N/S VERDUGO BLVD CITY LIMITS 6 42.83 100.00 2027 $0.00 $109,616.00 MOUNTAIN ST W A1787 N/S ETHEL ST W/S GREENBRIAR RD 7 69.07 73.82 2027 $21,190.83 $21,190.83 MOUNTAIN ST W A1795 W/S THOMPSON AVE E/S GRANDVIEW AVE 10 70.53 75.46 2027 $29,220.40 $29,220.40 MOUNTAIN ST W A1793 E/S ALAMEDA AVE W/S THURBER PL 10 73.65 79.11 2027 $30,181.83 $30,181.83 N GLENDALE AVE A1190 N/S MONTEREY RD N/S GLENOAKS BLVD 7 61.25 100.00 2027 $0.00 $611,325.27 N GLENDALE AVE A1189 N/S GLENOAKS BLVD W/S VERDUGO RD 7 70.19 100.00 2027 $0.00 $778,347.38 NEW YORK AVE A1806 N/S PARK VISTA DR S/S HONOLULU AVE 12 72.02 77.18 2027 $21,912.58 $21,912.58 360 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan NEW YORK AVE A1808 S/S ENCINAL AVE N/S HONOLULU AVE 12 72.99 78.33 2027 $35,944.30 $35,944.30 OCEAN VIEW BLVD A1844B N/S HONOLULU AVE N/S MONTROSE LN 6 80.66 87.52 2027 $29,270.64 $29,270.64 OCEAN VIEW BLVD A1845 N/S SUNVIEW DR S/S HONOLULU AVE 6 79.21 85.81 2027 $31,191.47 $31,191.47 OPECHEE WAY A1864 W/S VERDUGO RD E/S CANADA BLVD 6 74.15 79.71 2027 $21,222.74 $21,222.74 PACIFIC AVE S A1891 S/S GLENAOKS BLVD S/S 134 RAMPS 9 78.95 85.49 2027 $63,832.55 $63,832.55 S ORANGE ST A1874 N/S LEXINGTON DR S/S MILFORD ST 8 70.28 75.17 2027 $12,853.69 $12,853.69 S ORANGE ST A1866 W/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE E/S MARYLAND AVE 12 72.42 77.66 2027 $24,640.71 $24,640.71 SAN FERNANDO RD A2114 N/S FAIRMONT AVE N/S DORAN ST 8 91.91 91.91 2027 $4,178.30 $4,178.30 SAN FERNANDO RD A2115 S/S BROADWAY N/S DORAN ST 8 91.91 91.91 2027 $18,142.26 $18,142.26 SAN FERNANDO RD A2116 N/S RIVERDALE DR S/S BROADWAY 8 91.91 91.91 2027 $22,715.23 $22,715.23 SAN FERNANDO RD A2113 N/S FAIRMONT AVE E/S GRANDVIEW AVE 11 91.91 91.91 2027 $26,683.01 $26,683.01 SANCHEZ DR A2130 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 9 80.68 87.54 2027 $23,704.40 $23,704.40 SANTA CARLOTTA ST A2134 E/S MARYLAND AVE W/S NEW YORK AVE 12 73.40 78.82 2027 $27,775.54 $27,775.54 STANCREST DR A2217 E/S BROADVIEW DR W/S STANCREST FRONTAGE RD 6 68.53 73.23 2027 $32,385.78 $32,385.78 VERDUGO RD N A2355 168' S/O MENLO DR N/S LA CRESCENTA AVE 6 71.53 100.00 2027 $0.00 $397,979.86 VERDUGO RD N A2357 N/S LA CRESCENTA AVE 168' S/O MENLO DR 6 40.47 100.00 2027 $0.00 $397,979.86 VERDUGO RD N A2353 N/S WABASSO WAY N/S FERN LN 6 65.38 100.00 2027 $0.00 $419,112.56 VERDUGO RD N A2351 168' S/O MENLO DR N/S GLORIETTA AVE 6 64.75 100.00 2027 $0.00 $503,680.25 VERDUGO RD N A2352 N/S GLORIETTA AVE N/S FERN LN 6 63.68 100.00 2027 $0.00 $540,501.74 VERDUGO RD N A2344 N/S SHERER LN N/S WABASSO WAY 6 60.40 100.00 2027 $0.00 $554,303.87 VERDUGO RD N A2354 N/S LA CRESCENTA AVE S/S VERDUGO BLVD 6 66.48 100.00 2027 $0.00 $684,362.20 VERDUGO RD N A2356 S/S VERDUGO BLVD N/S LA CRESCENTA AVE 6 52.25 100.00 2027 $0.00 $684,362.20 VERDUGO RD N A2345 E/S CANADA BLVD N/S SHERER LN 6 49.01 100.00 2027 $0.00 $706,037.71 VERDUGO RD N A2350 S/S GLENDALE AVE N/S CANADA BLVD 7 62.78 100.00 2027 $0.00 $1,618,353.76 WESTERN AVE A2414 S/S VICTORY AVE N/S RIVERSIDE DR 11 78.55 85.01 2027 $29,319.53 $29,319.53 WESTERN AVE A2407 S/S MOUNTAIN ST N/S BEL AIRE DR 10 71.78 76.90 2027 $29,637.29 $29,637.29 2027 Totals $1,437,783 $11,429,155
361 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan AIR WAY A0026 E/S FLOWER ST W/S GRANDVIEW AVE 11 18.77 100.00 2028 $0.00 $626,048.50 AIR WAY A0025 W/S GRANDVIEW AVE E/S SONORA AVE 11 27.39 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,201,146.54 ALAMEDA AVE A0031A S/S KENNETH RD W S/S BEL AIRE DR 10 74.36 79.98 2028 $25,072.22 $25,072.22 ALAMEDA AVE A0030 S/S GLENWOOD RD S/S KENNETH RD W 10 76.78 82.90 2028 $25,075.71 $25,075.71 ALLEN AVE A0040 N/S FLOWER ST NORTH END 11 70.45 100.00 2028 $0.00 $196,069.28 ALLEN AVE A0039 S/S FLOWER ST N/S VICTORY BLVD 11 61.78 100.00 2028 $0.00 $796,453.68 BEAUDRY TER A0499 220' S/O J LEE CIR W/S DORA VERDUGO DR 6 74.20 79.78 2028 $36,550.57 $36,550.57 BROADWAY E A0575 E/S PACIFIC AVE E/S SAN FERNANDO RD 8 81.59 88.61 2028 $84,836.14 $84,836.14 CALIFORNIA AVE W A0622 W/S VERDUGO RD E/S CHEVY CHASE DR 3 77.17 83.36 2028 $18,201.85 $18,201.85 CALIFORNIA AVE W A0627 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S PACIFIC AVE 8 74.58 80.24 2028 $50,668.25 $50,668.25 COLINA DR A0793 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S SUNSHINE DR 6 75.04 80.80 2028 $21,730.05 $21,730.05 DORAN ST E A0926 W/S GENEVA ST W/S GLENDALE AVE 7 72.78 78.08 2028 $20,999.93 $20,999.93 DORAN ST E A0925 E/S JACKSON ST W/S GENEVA ST 7 77.25 83.46 2028 $29,488.58 $29,488.58 DORAN ST E A0935 E/S CENTRAL AVE W/S BRAND BLVD 9 77.09 83.27 2028 $33,379.74 $33,379.74 E GLENOAKS BLVD A1209 E/S SCHOLL DR W/S MOUNT CARMEL DR 4 73.83 79.34 2028 $42,318.07 $42,318.07 E GLENOAKS BLVD A1215 E/S AVONOAK TER 80' W/O CHEVY CHASE DR 4 75.87 81.79 2028 $62,757.82 $62,757.82 FAIRMONT AVE A5036 RAMP SPLIT VENTURA FWY ENTRANCE RAMP 9 73.23 100.00 2028 $0.00 $313,679.74 FAIRMONT AVE A5037 RAMP SPLIT VENTURA FWY ENTRANCE RAMP 9 77.10 100.00 2028 $0.00 $708,106.96 FAIRMONT AVE A5038 FLOWER ST RAMP SPLIT 11 77.41 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,061,849.36 FERN LN A1079 W/S DELISLE CT EAST END 6 74.46 80.10 2028 $30,440.39 $30,440.39 FLOWER ST A5040 END FAIRMONT AVE 11 76.95 100.00 2028 $0.00 $173,682.63 FLOWER ST A5041 END FLOWER ST 11 76.79 100.00 2028 $0.00 $181,792.93 FLOWER ST A5039 AIR WAY SAN FERNANDO RD 11 70.92 100.00 2028 $0.00 $210,690.04 FLOWER ST A1107 E/S WESTERN AVE W/S ALLEN AVE 11 30.63 100.00 2028 $0.00 $896,254.81 FLOWER ST A1108 E/S WESTERN AVE W/S SONORA AVE 11 70.61 100.00 2028 $0.00 $901,976.46 FLOWER ST A1110 W/S GRANDVIEW AVE S/S AIR WAY 11 53.20 100.00 2028 $0.00 $964,481.32 FLOWER ST A1109 W/S GRANDVIEW AVE W/S SONORA AVE 11 27.78 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,341,521.39 GENEVA ST A1166 N/S MONTEREY RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 7 78.81 85.33 2028 $5,750.71 $5,750.71 GENEVA ST A1167 N/S DORAN ST S/S MONTEREY RD 7 77.11 83.29 2028 $24,347.70 $24,347.70 GLORIETTA AVE A5046 BRIDGE WOODLAND AVE 6 78.19 84.59 2028 $5,087.73 $5,087.73 GLORIETTA AVE A1244 E/S RUSTIC LN E/S CANADA BLVD 6 77.12 83.30 2028 $10,148.89 $10,148.89 GRANDVIEW AVE A1264 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD N/S AIR WAY 11 74.07 100.00 2028 $0.00 $222,177.78 GRANDVIEW AVE A1265 N/S GRAND CENTRAL AVE S/S AIR WAY 11 6.97 100.00 2028 $0.00 $373,251.56 HARVARD ST E A1304 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 8 75.28 81.09 2028 $14,588.34 $14,588.34 HARVARD ST E A1300 E/S GLENDALE AVE W/S ADAMS ST 3 77.72 84.03 2028 $42,011.05 $42,011.05 362 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan HARVARD ST E A1299 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S BRAND BLVD 3 77.11 83.29 2028 $65,090.14 $65,090.14 HIGHLAND AVE A1344 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 9 73.69 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,038,040.63 HONOLULU AVE A1383 W/S LAS PALMAS AVE W/S ROSEMONT AVE 6 50.19 100.00 2028 $0.00 $836,938.52 HONOLULU AVE A1378 E/S NEW YORK AVE E/S DUNSMORE AVE 12 57.13 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,058,949.65 HONOLULU AVE A1382 W/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE E/S NEW YORK AVE 12 63.06 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,059,260.73 HONOLULU AVE A1376 E/S DUNSMORE AVE W/S BOSTON AVE 12 42.31 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,079,614.25 HONOLULU AVE A1381 W/S ROSEMONT AVE W/S LA CRESCENTA AVE 12 58.51 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,207,034.84 HONOLULU AVE A1380 W/S LA CRESCENTA AVE W/S RAMSDELL AVE 12 63.95 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,248,519.58 HONOLULU AVE A1379 W/S RAMSDELL AVE S/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE 12 66.63 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,275,505.77 HONOLULU AVE A1377 W/S BOSTON AVE W/S LOWELL AVE 12 67.17 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,591,540.83 ISABEL ST N A1425 N/S WILSON AVE S/S CALIFORNIA AVE 3 76.04 82.00 2028 $14,751.98 $14,751.98 JACKSON ST N A1438 N/S DORAN ST S/S MONTEREY RD 7 77.78 84.09 2028 $35,314.82 $35,314.82 KENNETH RD W A1482 E/S ALLEN AVE W/S WESTERN AVE 10 77.78 84.09 2028 $34,816.19 $34,816.19 LAKE ST A1533 W/S SONORA AVE E/S WESTERN AVE 11 77.10 83.28 2028 $39,185.70 $39,185.70 LOUISE ST S A1629 S/S HARVARD ST N/S COLORADO ST 3 74.51 80.16 2028 $16,875.20 $16,875.20 LOUISE ST S A1628 N/S HARVARD ST S/S BROADWAY 3 75.04 80.80 2028 $17,091.99 $17,091.99 MAPLE ST E A1662 E/S BRAND BLVD W/S GLENDALE AVE 1 76.49 82.54 2028 $28,943.79 $28,943.79 MARKRIDGE RD A1678 W/S DUSNMORE AVE E/S BOSTON AVE 12 74.66 80.33 2028 $27,831.13 $27,831.13 MONTEREY RD A1764 W/S VERDUGO RD E/S GLENDALE AVE 7 73.99 79.53 2028 $50,522.78 $50,522.78 OPECHEE WAY A1865 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 76.74 82.84 2028 $31,872.65 $31,872.65 PENNSYLVANIA AVE A1947 N/S ORANGE AVE S/S MARKRIDGE RD 12 76.70 82.80 2028 $55,351.06 $55,351.06 PENNSYLVANIA AVE A1946 N/S HONOLULU AVE S/S MONTROSE AVE 12 57.97 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,131,220.20 RIVERDALE DR A2052 E/S SAN FERNANDO RD W/S PACIFIC AVE 1 73.83 79.34 2028 $31,731.38 $31,731.38 RIVERSIDE DR A2054 S/S VICTORY BLVD W/S WESTERN AVE 11 72.62 77.90 2028 $64,234.84 $64,234.84 ROSELAWN AVE A2072 N/S HONOLULU AV S/S MONTROSE AVE 12 77.88 84.22 2028 $39,012.26 $39,012.26 ROYAL BLVD A2082 N/S PRINCESS DR N/S IMPERIAL DR 7 73.68 79.16 2028 $29,501.17 $29,501.17 S ORANGE ST A5060 BROADWAY W ALLEY XXX 9 75.81 81.73 2028 $11,704.94 $11,704.94 SANTA CARLOTTA ST A2136 W/S NEW YORK AVE W/S DUNSMORE AVE 12 76.01 81.96 2028 $59,831.06 $59,831.06 SONORA AVE A2191 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 72.85 78.17 2028 $32,376.18 $32,376.18 SONORA AVE A2193 N/S VICTORY BLVD S/S LAKE ST 11 74.21 79.80 2028 $40,331.93 $40,331.93 SONORA AVE A2192 S/S LAKE ST S/S SAN FERNANDO RD 11 72.47 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,745,947.61 VERDUGO RD N A2337 W/S VERDUGO RD EAST CITY LIMITS 6 78.09 84.46 2028 $126,762.58 $126,762.58 WESTERN AVE A2412 S/S LAKE ST S/S FLOWER ST 11 46.19 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,369,663.02 2028 Totals $1,436,588 $26,248,006
363 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition AfterWork Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
Glendale, CA - Main/Arterial/Collectors - $1.438M Given Budget Work Plan BEL AIRE DR A0503 E/S WESTERN AVE E/S IRVING AVE 10 76.65 82.74 2029 $25,214.27 $25,214.27 BROADWAY E A0576 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S PACIFIC AVE 8 85.64 85.64 2029 $12,089.72 $12,089.72 CENTRAL AVE N A0714 S/S RANDOLPH ST S/S KENNETH RD 9 84.44 91.88 2029 $34,137.66 $34,137.66 COLUMBUS AVE N A0802 N/S BROADWAY S/S WILSON AVE 8 85.64 85.64 2029 $1,920.31 $1,920.31 COLUMBUS AVE N A0803 N/S WILSON AVE N/S SALEM ST 8 80.69 87.56 2029 $8,661.91 $8,661.91 COLUMBUS AVE N A0820 N/S COLORADO ST S/S BROADWAY 8 85.64 85.64 2029 $11,238.08 $11,238.08 COLUMBUS AVE N A0811 N/S DRYDEN ST S/S STOCKER ST 9 81.78 88.84 2029 $21,941.11 $21,941.11 CONCORD ST A0831 N/S BURCHETT ST S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 9 86.84 86.84 2029 $2,905.65 $2,905.65 CONCORD ST A0830 S/S FAIRMONT AVE S/S BURCHETT ST 9 86.84 86.84 2029 $4,336.57 $4,336.57 CONCORD ST A0833 S/S GLENWOOD RD N/S SOUTH ST 9 80.37 87.18 2029 $20,605.63 $20,605.63 DORAN ST E A0927 E/S GLENDALE AVE W/S ADAMS ST 7 80.91 87.82 2029 $15,102.34 $15,102.34 DORAN ST E A0924 E/S JACKSON ST E/S BRAND BLVD 7 77.03 83.19 2029 $37,594.50 $37,594.50 E GLENOAKS BLVD A1218 E/S HARVEY DR W/S MOUNT CARMEL DR 4 76.50 82.56 2029 $18,905.66 $18,905.66 E CHEVY CHASE DR A0756C E/S EMERALD ISLE DR EAST CITY LIMITS 5 76.36 82.38 2029 $17,054.42 $17,054.42 E CHEVY CHASE DR A0757 N/S BROADWAY N/S WILSON AVE 3 62.55 100.00 2029 $0.00 $228,727.80 ETHEL ST A1043 W/S LA ZANJA DR W/S MOUNTAIN ST 7 86.84 86.84 2029 $2,065.90 $2,065.90 ETHEL ST A1045 E/S GLENOAKS BLVD W/S MONCADO DR 7 86.84 86.84 2029 $3,191.39 $3,191.39 ETHEL ST A1044 W/S MONCADO DR W/S LA ZANJA DR 7 86.84 86.84 2029 $5,166.54 $5,166.54 HIGHLAND AVE A1342 N/S GLENWOOD RD S/S KENNETH RD 9 78.88 85.42 2029 $41,410.78 $41,410.78 HIGHLAND AVE A1343 N/S GLENOAKS BLVD S/S GLENWOOD RD 9 77.46 83.71 2029 $56,544.82 $56,544.82 KENILWORTH AVE N A1463 N/S PALM DR E/S CONCORD ST 9 76.09 82.06 2029 $26,275.31 $26,275.31 KENNETH RD W A1486 W/S HILLCREST AVE W/S PACIFIC AVE 9 76.79 82.91 2029 $15,996.27 $15,996.27 KENNETH RD W A1480 E/S ALAMEDA AVE W/S ALLEN AVE 10 76.07 82.03 2029 $35,849.87 $35,849.87 KENNETH RD W A1489 E/S GRANDVIEW AVE W/S BRUCE AVE 9 63.53 100.00 2029 $0.00 $63,586.15 MARYLAND AVE A1701 N/S HARVARD ST S/S BROADWAY 3 78.38 84.81 2029 $20,540.80 $20,540.80 OCEAN VIEW BLVD A1844A N/S HONOLULU AVE N/S MONTROSE LN 6 64.65 100.00 2029 $0.00 $47,952.70 RIVERDALE DR A2050 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S COLUMBUS AVE 1 76.65 82.74 2029 $30,742.05 $30,742.05 RIVERSIDE DR A2053 W/S WESTERN AVE CITY LIMITS 11 81.06 88.00 2029 $82,691.19 $82,691.19 ROSSMOYNE AVE A2081 N/S ETHEL ST N/S STOCKER ST 7 77.89 84.23 2029 $15,641.14 $15,641.14 ROSSMOYNE AVE A2080 N/S STOCKER ST S/S MOUNTAIN ST 7 78.35 84.78 2029 $18,017.50 $18,017.50 STOCKER ST W A2233 E/S BRAND BLVD W/S JACKSON ST 7 77.97 84.33 2029 $43,557.35 $43,557.35 STOCKER ST W A2232 W/S JACKSON ST W/S ROSSMOYNE AVE 7 76.94 83.09 2029 $63,646.51 $63,646.51 WILSON TER A2439 W/S HARVEY DR CITY LIMITS 3 54.34 100.00 2029 $0.00 $101,429.04 WILSON TER A2436 E/S CHEVY CHASE DR W/S VERDUGO RD 3 62.98 100.00 2029 $0.00 $283,056.57 2029 Totals $693,045 $1,417,797
364 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
FOX PL A1123 E/S BALBOA AVE NORTH END 7 75.75 82.58 2025 $485.76 $485.76 OAKMONT DR A1833 E/S HAVEN ST E/S HILLSIDE TER 6 83.50 88.08 2025 $1,674.88 $1,674.88 ALCALDE WAY A5004 END ALCALDE DR 7 66.97 75.51 2025 $1,861.76 $1,861.76 ERIN CT A1036 E/S ERIN WAY EAST END 5 77.71 84.01 2025 $2,114.56 $2,114.56 STANTON AV A5063 RAYMOND AVE ALLEY 014 11 77.83 84.10 2025 $2,235.52 $2,235.52 WOODLAND AVE A2475A S/S GLORIETTA AVE SOUTH END 6 65.79 74.49 2025 $2,336.00 $2,336.00 JUNE LN A1447 W/S VERDUGO RD WEST END 6 63.68 72.62 2025 $2,468.48 $2,468.48 NARANJA DR A1801 S/S MONTEREY RD SOUTH END 7 65.50 74.23 2025 $2,712.96 $2,712.96 ARNELL PL A0463 N/S BOSTON AVE NORTH END 12 67.20 75.70 2025 $3,010.56 $3,010.56 MARYLAND AVE A5051 ALTURA AVE ENCINAL AVE 12 76.69 83.28 2025 $3,392.64 $3,392.64 EASTEDGE DR A0964 E/S SOLWAY ST EAST END 5 74.02 81.27 2025 $3,582.08 $3,582.08 EL CINO PL A0992 E/S VERDUGO RD W/S SPARR BLVD 6 77.50 83.87 2025 $3,698.56 $3,698.56 ACORN PL A0014 N/S CHEVY CHASE DR NORTH END 5 76.77 83.33 2025 $3,772.80 $3,772.80 TAMBOR DR A2269 N/S SHERER LN NORTH END 6 74.86 81.91 2025 $3,772.80 $3,772.80 DOLORES ST A0917 E/S SAN FERNANDO RD EAST END 1 76.66 83.25 2025 $3,864.96 $3,864.96 SANDRINGHAM DR A2131 N/S BALMORAL DR S/S SUNSHINE DR 7 74.03 81.28 2025 $4,028.80 $4,028.80 SANTA PAULA PL A2139 E/S CANADA BLVD EAST END 6 75.08 82.08 2025 $4,592.64 $4,592.64 VALENTINE DR A2318 S/S NESMUTH RD N/S NOLAN AVE 9 64.35 73.22 2025 $4,853.12 $4,853.12 WOODLAND AVE A2475B S/S GLORIETTA AVE SOUTH END 6 74.74 81.82 2025 $4,876.80 $4,876.80 AYARS CANYON WAY A0479 N/S OAKMONT VIEW DR NORTH END 6 75.03 82.04 2025 $4,970.24 $4,970.24 DAVIS AVE A0897 N/S GARDEN ST S/S RANDALL ST 11 74.27 81.46 2025 $5,109.12 $5,109.12 SPENCER ST A2208 E/S COLUMBUS AVE EAST END 9 72.94 80.43 2025 $5,211.52 $5,211.52 VALVERDE CT A2330 W/S ROSELAWN AVE WEST END 6 78.32 84.45 2025 $5,932.16 $5,932.16 JUSTIN AVE A1453 N/S LAKE ST N/S EMENS WAY 11 73.26 80.68 2025 $6,194.56 $6,194.56 SANTA MARIA AVE A2137 E/S WILLOW DR E/S CANADA BLVD 6 75.20 82.17 2025 $6,584.32 $6,584.32 KENTUCKY PL A1493 E/S MARYLAND AVE EAST END 12 74.97 82.00 2025 $6,754.56 $6,754.56 THOMPSON AVE A2287 N/S LAKE ST S/S EMENS WAY 11 73.93 81.20 2025 $6,793.60 $6,793.60 CALLE SONRISA A0645 N/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL NORTH END 5 69.47 77.63 2025 $7,005.44 $7,005.44 WASHINGTON PL A2403 E/S MARYLAND AVE EAST END 12 74.29 81.48 2025 $7,008.64 $7,008.64 IRVING AVE A1415 N/S LAKE ST N/S EMENS WAY 11 75.75 82.58 2025 $7,027.84 $7,027.84 GROVE PL A1286 N/S LEXINGTON DR N/S RICHARD PL 7 74.04 81.28 2025 $7,173.76 $7,173.76 CALIFORNIA AVE W A0623 E/S VERDUGO RD EAST END 3 73.92 81.20 2025 $7,319.68 $7,319.68 Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget 365 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget GARDNER PL A1151 N/S GLENOAKS BLVD E S/S HOLLISTER TER 4 77.71 84.01 2025 $7,479.68 $7,479.68 HAMPTON LN A1295 W/S ALLEN AVE WEST END 10 75.06 82.06 2025 $7,565.44 $7,565.44 BEULAH ST A0519 S/S ARDEN AVE N/S BURCHETT ST 9 70.28 78.29 2025 $7,805.44 $7,805.44 FAIRFIELD ST A1069 E/S PAULA AVE E/S DAVIS AVE 11 76.90 83.43 2025 $8,055.04 $8,055.04 CARMEN DR A0679 S/S MOUNTAIN ST N/S DEL REY DR 7 78.07 84.27 2025 $8,174.72 $8,174.72 MARYLAND AVE A1705 E/S MARYLAND AVE W/S LOUISE ST 7 73.92 81.20 2025 $8,188.80 $8,188.80 CALLE SUENOS A0646 E/S CALLE LA PRIMAVERA NORTH END 5 72.11 79.77 2025 $8,662.40 $8,662.40 LAUDERDALE AVE A1551 N/S ANDERSON AVE N/S HONOLULU AVE 12 71.40 79.20 2025 $8,783.36 $8,783.36 BALBOA AVE A0482 N/S DORAN ST NORTH END 7 75.19 82.16 2025 $8,802.56 $8,802.56 BURCHETT ST A0595 W/S ALMA ST E/S PELANCONI AVE 9 76.78 83.34 2025 $8,996.48 $8,996.48 LOMA VISTA DR A1591 S/S SHERER LN SOUTH END 6 71.85 79.56 2025 $9,061.12 $9,061.12 PETERS CIR A1953 W/S BEAUDRY TER SOUTH END 6 76.53 83.16 2025 $9,121.92 $9,121.92 LANGLEY ST A1536 N/S DIXON ST S/S COLORADO ST 3 75.06 82.06 2025 $9,396.48 $9,396.48 SIERRA VISTA AVE A2167 N/S VALVERDE PL S/S BROADVIEW DR 6 72.95 80.43 2025 $9,473.28 $9,473.28 OAK CIRCLE DR A1821 E/S ROSELAWN AVE E/S OAK CIRCLE DR 6 73.17 80.61 2025 $9,649.28 $9,649.28 LOUISE ST S A1620 N/S MOUNTAIN ST N/S DWIGHT DR 7 70.03 78.09 2025 $9,694.08 $9,694.08 CALLE DULCE A0638 E/S CALLE CANTA EAST END 5 74.93 81.96 2025 $9,795.84 $9,795.84 BEN LOMOND DR A0515 N/S CUMBERLAND RD S/S MATILIJA RD 9 76.08 82.83 2025 $9,806.72 $9,806.72 AMARILLO DR A0429 W/S BAYBERRY DR WEST END 6 77.97 84.20 2025 $9,991.04 $9,991.04 RANGEVIEW DR A2014 W/S ELM AVE S/S MOUNTAIN ST 10 70.25 78.27 2025 $10,377.60 $10,377.60 BLACKMORE DR A0522A S/S GLENOAKS BLVD SOUTH END 4 75.27 82.22 2025 $10,448.00 $10,448.00 SINCLAIR AVE A2172 N/S CALIFORNIA AVE S/S CHEVY CHASE DR 3 76.68 83.26 2025 $10,632.96 $10,632.96 ARD EEVIN AVE A0444 N/S KENNETH RD S/S GLENVIEW RD 9 74.59 81.71 2025 $11,112.96 $11,112.96 PROSPECT AVE A1986 W/S NEW YORK AVE WEST END 12 77.82 84.09 2025 $11,790.72 $11,790.72 MOUNTBATTEN DR A1798 N/S OLD PHILLIPS RD NORTH END 7 72.01 79.70 2025 $12,129.28 $12,129.28 HILLSIDE DR A1360 E/S CANADA BLVD EAST END 6 78.45 84.54 2025 $12,170.24 $12,170.24 ARDEN AVE A0449 E/S ESTELLE AVE W/S CONCORD ST 9 89.45 94.45 2025 $12,371.84 $12,371.84 SYCAMORE AVE A2265 W/S AGNER AVE W/S ROSEMONT AVE 12 72.84 80.35 2025 $12,751.36 $12,751.36 RANGEVIEW DR A2015 S/S MOUNTAIN ST E/S ELM AVE 10 73.69 81.02 2025 $12,770.56 $12,770.56 EVERETT ST S A1052 N/S WILSON AVE S/S CALIFORNIA AVE 3 73.61 80.95 2025 $12,807.04 $12,807.04 ANGELUS AVE A0436 N/S VALVERDE PL S/S BROADVIEW DR 6 78.09 84.29 2025 $12,820.48 $12,820.48 CALLE CONTENTO A0635 N/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL WEST END 5 74.24 81.44 2025 $12,885.76 $12,885.76 366 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget PORTER ST A1975 N/S WINDSOR RD S/S MAPLE ST 3 77.72 84.03 2025 $13,020.79 $13,020.79 SINCLAIR AVE A2174 N/S BROADWAY S/S WILSON AVE 3 77.49 83.86 2025 $13,070.07 $13,070.07 EL CAMINITO ST A0988 W/S BOSTON AVE WEST END 12 76.41 83.07 2025 $13,091.83 $13,091.83 QUAIL CANYON RD A1992A N/S MARKRIDGE RD NORTH END 12 76.78 83.34 2025 $13,333.11 $13,333.11 PATTERSON AVE A1937 W/S CONCORD ST E/S ESTELLE AVE 9 59.35 68.72 2025 $13,359.35 $13,359.35 CEDAR ST N A0699 N/S WILSON AVE S/S CALIFORNIA AVE 3 76.10 82.84 2025 $13,644.15 $13,644.15 ZOE ANNE WAY A2479 N/S BURRITT WAY NORTH END 12 77.46 83.84 2025 $13,770.23 $13,770.23 SYCAMORE AVE A2264 E/S LA CRESCENTA AVE W/S AGNER AVE 12 77.97 84.20 2025 $13,784.95 $13,784.95 CALLE LA PRIMAVERA A0641 S/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL S/S CALLE FORTUNA 5 75.50 82.39 2025 $13,828.47 $13,828.47 ARDEN AVE A0448 E/S HIGHLAND AVE W/S ESTELLE AVE 9 86.12 90.17 2025 $13,845.75 $13,845.75 VISTA DEL MAR DR A2394 S/S MENLO DR W/S EL TOVAR DR 6 71.18 79.02 2025 $13,969.91 $13,969.91 DOWNING AVE A0941 N/S SUNVIEW DR S/S BROADVIEW DR 6 73.73 81.04 2025 $14,223.35 $14,223.35 PATTERSON AVE A1936 W/S ESTELLE AVE E/S HIGHLAND AVE 9 62.81 71.85 2025 $14,446.71 $14,446.71 EL ARBOLITA DR A0982 E/S MONTECITO DR W/S BAYBERRY DR 6 77.50 83.87 2025 $14,526.71 $14,526.71 OMAR ST A1861 E/S ESTELLE AVE EAST END 9 74.38 81.55 2025 $14,534.39 $14,534.39 WONDERVIEW DR A2467 N/S ASPEN OAK LN SOUTH END 9 70.47 78.45 2025 $14,581.75 $14,581.75 FOXKIRK RD A1125 S/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL S/S PARCHER PL 5 74.13 81.35 2025 $14,638.07 $14,638.07 OMAR ST A1860 W/S ESTELLE AVE E/S HIGHLAND AVE 9 69.08 77.30 2025 $14,852.47 $14,852.47 ALPHA RD A0418 W/S OAKWOOD AVE E/S VERDUGO RD 6 71.62 79.38 2025 $14,996.47 $14,996.47 EVERETT ST S A1053 N/S BROADWAY S/S WILSON AVE 3 78.43 84.53 2025 $15,104.63 $15,104.63 EL ARBOLITA DR A0981 E/S MENLO DR W/S MONTECITO DR 6 76.46 83.11 2025 $15,223.67 $15,223.67 HARVARD ST E A1306 E/S KENILWORTH AVE W/S PACIFIC AVE 8 77.26 83.69 2025 $15,510.39 $15,510.39 CYPRESS ST E A0884 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S BRAND BLVD 1 73.94 81.21 2025 $15,599.99 $15,599.99 BURCHETT ST A0599 W/S CONCORD ST EAST END 9 72.04 79.71 2025 $15,788.79 $15,788.79 BURCHETT ST A0598 W/S CONCORD ST E/S ESTELLE AVE 9 68.87 77.12 2025 $15,878.39 $15,878.39 CAMULOS AVE A0665 E/S CANADA BLVD EAST END 6 73.96 81.22 2025 $15,880.95 $15,880.95 IDLEWOOD RD A1399 N/S GLENWOOD RD N/S OLMSTED DR 9 77.13 83.60 2025 $15,881.59 $15,881.59 DEERMONT RD A0905 S/S RIMCREST DR SOUTH END 7 72.24 79.87 2025 $15,909.75 $15,909.75 CANONWOOD DR A0670 N/S RIMCREST DR S/S ASPEN OAK LN 9 72.79 80.31 2025 $16,023.03 $16,023.03 PIEDMONT AVE A1960 W/S ROSEMONT AVE W/S MANHATTAN AVE 12 75.88 82.68 2025 $16,298.23 $16,298.23 THE MIDWAY A2272 S/S KIRKBY RD N/S TOWNE ST 6 73.25 80.67 2025 $16,492.79 $16,492.79 CALLE CANTA A0634 E/S CALLE LA PRIMAVERA N/S CALLE LA COSTA 5 77.12 83.59 2025 $16,502.39 $16,502.39 367 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget MARYLAND AVE A1689 S/S FRANCES AVE NORTH END 12 74.93 81.97 2025 $16,732.15 $16,732.15 SPARR BLVD A2199 N/S EL ARBOLITA DR N/S VICKERS DR 6 68.57 76.87 2025 $17,217.91 $17,217.91 ROSEMARY AVE A2070 N/S SUNVIEW DR S/S BROADVIEW DR 6 75.88 82.68 2025 $17,372.79 $17,372.79 CHILTON DR A0770 E/S ELM AVE W/S ALLEN AVE 10 72.69 80.24 2025 $17,582.71 $17,582.71 BURCHETT ST A0597 W/S ESTELLE AVE E/S HIGHLAND AVE 9 79.13 85.03 2025 $17,751.03 $17,751.03 CALLE SIRENA A0644 E/S CALLE CANTA NORTH END 5 73.23 80.65 2025 $17,818.87 $17,818.87 ACACIA AV A0009 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S COLUMBUS AVE 1 76.22 82.93 2025 $17,972.47 $17,972.47 MAPLE ST E A1658 E/S LINCOLN ST EAST END 3 75.28 100.00 2025 $0.00 $18,253.72 RAYMOND AVE A2020 N/S GLENWOOD RD S/S KENNETH RD 10 77.25 83.68 2025 $18,645.75 $18,645.75 VALLEJO DR A2322 S/S HOLLY DR N/S WILSON TER 3 74.39 81.55 2025 $18,647.67 $18,647.67 WINCHESTER AVE A2449 S/S GLENOAKS BLVD N/S SAN FERNANDO RD 10 71.37 79.18 2025 $18,782.07 $18,782.07 HOLLISTER TER A1371 E/S SCHOLL DR W/S TRYON PL 4 76.77 83.33 2025 $19,582.07 $19,582.07 ALPHA RD A0419 W/S OAKWOOD AVE EAST END 6 78.09 84.29 2025 $19,712.63 $19,712.63 SALEM ST A2102 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S COLUMBUS AVE 8 77.94 84.18 2025 $20,213.75 $20,213.75 SPARR BLVD A2201 N/S MENLO DR E/S VERDUGO RD 6 74.86 81.91 2025 $20,322.55 $20,322.55 CALLE CANTA A0633 N/S CALLE LA COSTA S/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL 5 72.11 79.77 2025 $20,865.27 $20,865.27 IRVING AVE A1413 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 69.30 77.48 2025 $21,658.23 $21,658.23 GROVER AVE A1287 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 79.25 85.11 2025 $21,685.75 $21,685.75 WINDSOR RD E A2457 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S BRAND BLVD 1 76.91 83.44 2025 $22,097.91 $22,097.91 CORTEZ DR A0849 S/S ROSSMOYNE AVE N/S ROSSMOYNE AVE 7 71.59 79.36 2025 $22,370.55 $22,370.55 JUSTIN AVE A1450 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 70.50 78.47 2025 $23,123.83 $23,123.83 VIRGINIA ST A2383 N/S SOUTH ST S/S GLENWOOD RD 9 77.25 83.68 2025 $23,447.03 $23,447.03 STARVALE RD A2226 E/S RIMCREST DR S/S CIELITO DR 7 72.35 79.96 2025 $25,023.99 $25,023.99 ROCK GLEN AVE A2059 E/S LINCOLN AVE E/S VERDUGO RD 3 78.65 84.69 2025 $25,237.75 $25,237.75 THOMPSON AVE A2283 N/S HALE ST S/S STANDARD AVE 11 78.19 100.00 2025 $0.00 $26,128.66 PORTER ST A1974 N/S MAPLE ST S/S COLORADO ST 3 72.71 80.25 2025 $27,362.55 $27,362.55 ESTELLE AVE A1042 S/S GLENOAKS BLVD SOUTH END 9 67.59 76.04 2025 $28,119.67 $28,119.67 ERIN CT A1038 120' S/O ERIN CT W/S EMERALD ISLE DR 5 77.00 83.50 2025 $33,029.75 $33,029.75 RANCHO AVE A2007 S/S RIVERSIDE DR W/S WESTERN AVE 11 75.86 82.66 2025 $33,277.43 $33,277.43 POLARIS DR A1970 N/S SUNSHINE DR S/S BRANTA DR 6 77.13 83.60 2025 $33,660.79 $33,660.79 THOMPSON AVE A2282 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD N/S HALE ST 11 73.26 100.00 2025 $0.00 $34,934.83 MONTROSE AVE A1768 W/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE E/S NEW YORK AVE 12 76.54 83.17 2025 $38,638.07 $38,638.07 368 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget THOMPSON AVE A2284 S/S STANDARD AVE SOUTH END 11 74.04 100.00 2025 $0.00 $41,316.79 ROCK GLEN AVE A2060 E/S LINCOLN AVE EAST END 3 67.46 100.00 2025 $0.00 $42,129.10 WESTON PL A2417 S/S DEL VALLE AVE N/S EL RITO AVE 6 30.61 100.00 2025 $0.00 $50,892.38 FAIRCOURT LN A1060 N/S FAIRMONT AVE W/S CONCORD ST 9 29.46 100.00 2025 $0.00 $51,572.21 CHEROKEE LN A0727 N/S PLUMAS ST N/S VERD OAKS DR 3 73.16 100.00 2025 $0.00 $66,182.25 ALMA ST A0415 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S KELLOGG AVE 9 27.67 100.00 2025 $0.00 $66,486.31 OSCEOLA ST A1884 N/S PLUMAS ST S/S VERD OAKS DR 3 34.96 100.00 2025 $0.00 $67,482.11 RUBERTA AVE A2094 N/S COSMIC WAY S/S FLOWER ST 11 39.96 100.00 2025 $0.00 $76,689.03 SANTA ROSA AVE A2140 N/S COUNTRY CLUB DR N/S SAN GABRIEL AVE 6 47.25 100.00 2025 $0.00 $79,350.38 COMMERCIAL ST A0821 S/S DORAN ST N/S MILFORD ST 8 39.62 100.00 2025 $0.00 $81,184.34 PATTERSON AVE A1935 W/S HIGHLAND AVE E/S ALMA ST 9 53.66 100.00 2025 $0.00 $83,397.74 HERMOSITA DR A1332 N/S RAMONA AVE S/S SANTA MARIA AVE 6 63.16 100.00 2025 $0.00 $85,384.53 GRANT AVE A1269 N/S DALE AVE S/S OMAR ST 9 59.56 100.00 2025 $0.00 $86,902.29 HIGH LINE RD A1339 S/S VERD OAKS DR SOUTH END 3 35.32 100.00 2025 $0.00 $89,813.21 PELANCONI AVE A1943 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S KELLOGG AVE 9 37.35 100.00 2025 $0.00 $108,177.27 HERMOSITA DR A1335 N/S DON CARLOS AVE N/S EL RITO AVE 6 34.71 100.00 2025 $0.00 $109,558.01 DALE AVE A0891 N/S GRANGE ST S/S HIGHLAND AVE 9 66.72 100.00 2025 $0.00 $109,895.29 STATE ST A2228 N/S MILFORD ST S/S DORAN ST 8 69.51 100.00 2025 $0.00 $111,059.96 HERMOSITA DR A1336 N/S OPECHEE WAY N/S EL RITO AVE 6 26.71 100.00 2025 $0.00 $117,710.70 HERMOSITA DR A1334 N/S RAMONA AVE N/S DON CARLOS AVE 6 31.71 100.00 2025 $0.00 $118,047.98 GRANGE ST A1267 W/S ESTELLE AVE E/S SAN FERNANDO RD 9 64.81 100.00 2025 $0.00 $121,947.78 LINCOLN AVE A1573 N/S MAPLE ST S/S ROCK GLEN AVE 3 38.61 100.00 2025 $0.00 $124,254.19 ACACIA AV A0007 E/S VERDUGO RD W/S CHEROKEE LN 3 60.10 100.00 2025 $0.00 $126,476.19 HERMOSITA DR A1333 S/S COUNTRY CLUB DR S/S SANTA MARIA AVE 6 29.74 100.00 2025 $0.00 $134,637.94 STANDARD AVE A2219 W/S WESTERN AVE E/S THOMPSON AVE 11 64.92 100.00 2025 $0.00 $142,147.69 SANTA ROSA AVE A2141 S/S COUNTRY CLUB DR E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 33.04 100.00 2025 $0.00 $144,524.46 DON CARLOS AVE A0919 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 39.57 100.00 2025 $0.00 $147,264.86 GLORIETTA AVE A1245 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 50.56 100.00 2025 $0.00 $150,031.61 THOMPSON AVE A2281 S/S GLENOAKS BLVD N/S SAN FERNANDO RD 10 58.30 100.00 2025 $0.00 $154,621.78 DAVIS AVE A0900 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 41.62 100.00 2025 $0.00 $154,790.42 ROSEDALE AVE A2066 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 67.36 100.00 2025 $0.00 $154,827.31 NEWBY ST A1810 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 51.84 100.00 2025 $0.00 $154,858.93 369 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget WILLARD AVE A2430 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 49.01 100.00 2025 $0.00 $154,885.28 IDLEWOOD RD A1401 N/S ZOOK DR S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 9 68.76 100.00 2025 $0.00 $156,930.04 DEL VALLE AVE A0909 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 30.71 100.00 2025 $0.00 $157,309.48 SANTA MARIA AVE A2138 W/S COUNTRY CLUB DR E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 44.67 100.00 2025 $0.00 $158,758.73 GRAYNOLD AVE A1272 N/S ZOOK DR S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 9 49.78 100.00 2025 $0.00 $159,870.70 ZOOK DR A2480 E/S CLEVELAND RD W/S NORTON AVE 9 55.78 100.00 2025 $0.00 $167,480.58 SANTA BARBARA AVE A2132 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 36.91 100.00 2025 $0.00 $171,053.64 VERD OAKS DR A2336 E/S CHEROKEE LN EAST END 3 40.82 100.00 2025 $0.00 $174,693.57 WINCHESTER AVE A2446 S/S BEL AIRE DR N/S KENNETH RD 10 62.25 100.00 2025 $0.00 $177,145.76 WINCHESTER AVE A2447 S/S KENNETH RD N/S GLENWOOD RD 10 46.84 100.00 2025 $0.00 $177,177.38 WINCHESTER AVE A2448 S/S GLENWOOD RD N/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 62.78 100.00 2025 $0.00 $177,430.34 RAYMOND AVE A2022 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 52.81 100.00 2025 $0.00 $178,457.99 SAN GABRIEL AVE A2122 W/S SANTA ROSA AVE E/S COUNTRY CLUB DR 6 33.22 100.00 2025 $0.00 $182,631.82 ALMA ST A0416 N/S KELLOGG ST S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 9 47.05 100.00 2025 $0.00 $185,561.94 EL RITO AVE A1002 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 36.45 100.00 2025 $0.00 $189,704.16 PELANCONI AVE A1942 S/S GLENOAKS BLVD S/S KELLOGG AVE 9 62.39 100.00 2025 $0.00 $194,594.72 ELM AVE A1018 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 39.33 100.00 2025 $0.00 $196,202.07 LINDEN AVE A1583 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 53.55 100.00 2025 $0.00 $214,004.13 CAPISTRANO AVE A0674 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S HERMOSITA DR 6 75.55 100.00 2025 $0.00 $216,786.69 NORTON AVE A1819 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 9 53.45 100.00 2025 $0.00 $217,313.69 WINCHESTER AVE A2445 S/S MOUNTAIN ST N/S BEL AIRE DR 10 59.84 100.00 2025 $0.00 $230,019.66 LINCOLN AVE A1572 N/S ROCK GLEN AVE S/S COLORADO ST 3 61.33 100.00 2025 $0.00 $264,195.70 KELLOGG AVE A1460 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD E/S PELANCONI AVE 9 58.72 100.00 2025 $0.00 $270,445.82 CLEVELAND RD A0778 S/S GLENOAKS BLVD E/S GRANDVIEW AVE 9 52.27 100.00 2025 $0.00 $316,410.76 MAPLE ST E A1661 E/S LINCOLN ST E/S VERDUGO RD 3 59.97 100.00 2025 $0.00 $353,442.30 MILFORD ST E A1746 W/S BRENT PL E/S SAN FERNANDO RD 8 55.56 100.00 2025 $0.00 $415,054.60 2025 Totals $1,595,560 $10,486,054
370 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget VERDUGO KNOLLS PL A5066 VERDUGO KNOLLS DR END 6 79.52 85.30 2026 $2,054.73 $2,054.73 LOCKWOOD RD A1588 W/S OAK GLEN RD E/S MARCIA RD 6 83.75 88.26 2026 $2,164.15 $2,164.15 RAFAEL TER A1993 S/S EL ARBOLITA DR SOUTH END 6 85.42 89.56 2026 $2,189.86 $2,189.86 STANTON AV A5064 ALLEY 013 WESTERN AVE 11 82.10 87.09 2026 $2,644.05 $2,644.05 ACACIA AV A5001 SAN FERNANDO RD ALLEY 15 1 77.64 83.97 2026 $2,738.32 $2,738.32 OLIVE ST A5054 WILSON AVE E ALLEY 194 3 79.37 85.20 2026 $2,967.06 $2,967.06 RAYMOND AVE A2024 N/S LAKE ST S/S EMENS WAY 11 76.72 83.29 2026 $3,276.22 $3,276.22 HILLCREST AVE A1352 135' N/O CUMBERLAND RD N/S CUMBERLAND RD 9 85.93 89.99 2026 $3,586.71 $3,586.71 GLENWOOD AV A1235 N/S HONOLULU AVE S/S HERMOSA AVE 12 81.16 86.44 2026 $3,760.08 $3,760.08 GLENVIA ST A1227 E/S BALBOA AVE EAST END 7 78.04 84.25 2026 $3,896.53 $3,896.53 SCHOLL DR A2145 S/S GLEN IVY DR SOUTH END 4 81.44 86.64 2026 $4,349.40 $4,349.40 BAYBERRY DR A0494 E/S OAKGLEN RD E/S SPARR BL 6 84.54 88.85 2026 $4,729.10 $4,729.10 VALVERDE CT A2329 N/S VALVERDE PL NORTH END 6 77.39 83.78 2026 $4,755.47 $4,755.47 ESPERANZA TER A1040 N/S OAKMONT VIEW DR NORTH END 6 84.82 89.07 2026 $4,781.18 $4,781.18 ISABEL ST N A1422 S/S MONTEREY RD SOUTH END 7 82.79 87.57 2026 $4,853.69 $4,853.69 KENWOOD ST N A1495 S/S MONTEREY RD SOUTH END 7 82.10 87.09 2026 $4,936.09 $4,936.09 CALLE LA COSTA A0640 E/S CALLE CANTA EAST END 5 81.72 86.83 2026 $5,109.46 $5,109.46 KENILWORTH AVE N A1471 N/S MYRTLE ST S/S LEXINGTON DR 8 79.24 85.10 2026 $5,156.92 $5,156.92 PORTER ST A1976 N/S GARFIELD AVE S/S WINDSOR RD 3 82.24 87.19 2026 $5,390.94 $5,390.94 MARYLAND AVE A1702 N/S WINDSOR RD NORTH END 1 82.80 87.58 2026 $5,547.83 $5,547.83 MELWOOD DR A1724 W/S REMAH VISTA RD SOUTH END 7 79.94 85.59 2026 $5,706.69 $5,706.69 MARKRIDGE RD A5050 SKY RIDGE DR BOSTON AV 12 77.23 83.67 2026 $5,819.42 $5,819.42 COLUMBUS AVE N A0808 N/S PIONEER ST NORTH END 8 83.74 88.26 2026 $5,943.34 $5,943.34 SUNVIEW DR A2250 W/S ROSEMARY AVE E/S LAS PALMAS AVE 6 77.91 84.16 2026 $6,229.44 $6,229.44 PRINCETON ST A1983 W/S VASSAR AVE E/S GARDENA AVE 1 84.65 88.94 2026 $6,516.19 $6,516.19 MARYANN ST A1683 W/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE WEST END 12 79.12 85.02 2026 $6,682.97 $6,682.97 BIRCH AVE A0521 N/S BEL AIRE DR S/S BELLEVUE DR 10 78.82 84.81 2026 $6,740.98 $6,740.98 EL TOVAR DR A1005 S/S EL VISTA CT N/S MONTECITO DR 6 80.47 85.96 2026 $6,982.90 $6,982.90 MENLO DR A1730 164' E/O SPARR BLVD S/S EL ARBOLITA DR 6 82.80 87.58 2026 $7,029.71 $7,029.71 MAURITA PL A1709 W/S GENEVA ST E/S HOWARD ST 7 76.99 83.49 2026 $7,340.85 $7,340.85 KENWOOD ST N A1494 E/S KENWOOD ST W/S JACKSON ST 7 82.79 87.58 2026 $7,344.14 $7,344.14 GLENCOE WAY A1180 W/S VICKERS DR E/S SPARR BLVD 6 78.58 84.64 2026 $7,402.15 $7,402.15 371 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget MILDINE DR A1739 W/S ROSELAWN AVE NORTH END 6 78.31 84.45 2026 $7,762.08 $7,762.08 SPENCER ST A2209A W/S COLUMBUS AVE E/S PACIFIC AVE 9 81.97 87.01 2026 $7,805.58 $7,805.58 CAPISTRANO AVE A0675 E/S CANADA BLVD EAST END 6 76.74 83.31 2026 $8,203.74 $8,203.74 BAGDAD PL A0480 E/S VERDUGO RD W/S SPARR BL 6 77.00 83.50 2026 $8,270.32 $8,270.32 CALLE AZUL A0631 NORTH END SOUTH END 5 79.24 85.11 2026 $8,332.28 $8,332.28 OAKMONT VIEW DR A9977 - END 6 79.92 85.58 2026 $8,373.16 $8,373.16 ENCINAL AVE A1035A E/S NEW YORK AVE W/S MARYLAND AVE 12 85.18 89.35 2026 $8,582.78 $8,582.78 ISABEL ST N A1423 N/S DORAN ST S/S JACKSON PL 7 77.24 83.68 2026 $9,012.58 $9,012.58 RIDGEWAY DR A2040 N/S CUMBERLAND RD S/S MEADOWS DR 9 77.25 83.68 2026 $9,052.79 $9,052.79 WOODLAND AVE A2474 E/S CANADA BLVD W/S RUSTIC LN 6 77.39 83.78 2026 $9,122.67 $9,122.67 BURCHETT ST A0596 W/S HIGHLAND AVE E/S ALMA ST 9 78.29 84.43 2026 $9,137.17 $9,137.17 KENWOOD ST N A1496 N/S DORAN ST N/S KENWOOD PL 7 78.43 84.53 2026 $9,163.54 $9,163.54 COLUMBUS AVE N A0810 N/S BURCHETT ST S/S ARDEN AVE 9 84.66 88.94 2026 $9,306.58 $9,306.58 WHITING WOODS RD A2420 S/S HONOLULU AVE N/S EL LADO DR 12 76.20 82.92 2026 $10,136.51 $10,136.51 MARYLAND AVE A1696 N/S DORAN ST N/S MARYLAND PL 7 80.72 86.14 2026 $10,241.99 $10,241.99 FLORENCE PL A1106 N/S CHEVY CHASE DR S/S ACACIA AVE 1 79.78 85.48 2026 $10,334.93 $10,334.93 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR A2181 S/S SLEEPY HOLLOW PL WEST END 4 82.00 87.02 2026 $10,478.64 $10,478.64 CALLE ALEGRE A0629 N/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL N/S CALLE AZUL 5 81.44 86.64 2026 $10,590.70 $10,590.70 CASTERA AVE A0687 E/S VERDUGO RD S/S GLENCOE WAY 6 77.26 83.69 2026 $11,031.05 $11,031.05 CALLE FORTUNA A0639 E/S CALLE LA PRIMAVERA EAST END 5 78.84 84.82 2026 $11,243.31 $11,243.31 GALER PL A1140 N/S RICHARD PL N/S NARANJA DR 7 76.58 83.19 2026 $11,649.38 $11,649.38 KENILWORTH AVE N A1476 N/S COLORADO ST S/S HARVARD ST 8 82.66 87.48 2026 $11,699.48 $11,699.48 CALLE SIMPATICA A0643 W/S CALLE BELLA WEST END 5 78.70 84.73 2026 $11,783.85 $11,783.85 CRESTSHIRE DR A0871 W/S VIRDEN DR EAST END 6 83.89 88.37 2026 $11,905.81 $11,905.81 ELK AVE E A1013 W/S CHEVY CHASE DR E/S ADAMS ST 3 77.78 84.06 2026 $12,211.02 $12,211.02 CALLE BELLA A0632 S/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL SOUTH END 5 77.90 84.15 2026 $12,262.43 $12,262.43 SPARR BLVD A2200 N/S MENLO DR N/S EL ARBOLITA DR 6 77.52 83.88 2026 $12,267.71 $12,267.71 SHERLOCK DR A2160B N/S MOUNTAIN ST CITY LIMITS 10 84.32 88.69 2026 $12,441.08 $12,441.08 GLENCOVE AVE A0604A W/S GLENCOVE AVE E/S LOWELL AVE 12 81.99 87.02 2026 $12,535.34 $12,535.34 MERRIMAN DR A1732 N/S KENNETH RD S/S CUMBERLAND RD 9 76.20 82.92 2026 $12,746.95 $12,746.95 MIRALOMA AVE A1751 E/S GARDENA AVE W/S SAN FERNANDO RD 1 85.40 89.54 2026 $12,869.56 $12,869.56 DEL VALLE AVE A0910 E/S CANADA BLVD EAST END 6 82.40 87.30 2026 $12,978.98 $12,978.98 372 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget EDGEWICK RD A0969 E/S PADDINGTON RD W/S ARUNDLE PL 5 76.84 83.39 2026 $13,022.49 $13,022.49 CAMPBELL ST A0660 N/S GLENMONT DR N/S MOUNTAIN ST 7 84.19 88.59 2026 $13,338.91 $13,338.91 EVERETT ST S A1050 N/S GLENOAKS BLVD S/S DRYDEN ST 7 82.11 87.10 2026 $13,695.53 $13,695.53 ISABEL ST N A1426 N/S BROADWAY S/S WILSON AVE 3 78.83 84.82 2026 $13,856.38 $13,856.38 BELMONT ST N A0510 N/S WILSON AVE S/S CALIFORNIA AVE 3 81.69 86.81 2026 $14,027.11 $14,027.11 ANDERSON AVE A0434 W/S DUNSMORE AVE E/S LAURDERDALE AVE 12 76.87 83.40 2026 $14,706.09 $14,706.09 MONTROSE AVE A1772 W/S DUNSMORE AVE E/S LAUDERDALE AVE 12 82.54 87.40 2026 $14,723.89 $14,723.89 ORANGE GROVE AVE A1872 W/S CHEVY CHASE DR W/S ADAMS ST 3 76.99 83.49 2026 $15,708.07 $15,708.07 FAIRESTA ST A1061 W/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE WEST END 12 76.46 83.11 2026 $15,723.23 $15,723.23 BRANTA DR A0559 W/S HILLSIDE DR WEST END 6 76.48 83.12 2026 $15,744.99 $15,744.99 BELMONT ST N A0509 N/S BROADWAY S/S WILSON AVE 3 76.59 83.20 2026 $16,016.58 $16,016.58 FRANKLIN ST A1128 S/S BROADWAY N/S HARVARD ST 3 81.28 86.52 2026 $16,464.17 $16,464.17 SUNSHINE DR A2245 W/S SANDRINGHAM DR 43' N/O KILDONAN DR (GATE) 7 77.91 84.16 2026 $16,928.91 $16,928.91 STANLEY AVE A2223 W/S VERDUGO RD E/S CHEVY CHASE DR 3 85.41 89.55 2026 $17,515.60 $17,515.60 SUNSHINE DR A2247 E/S COLINA DR N/S SUNSHINE CT 6 83.38 88.00 2026 $17,690.28 $17,690.28 SECOND AVE A2149 W/S BOSTON AVE WEST END 12 77.10 83.57 2026 $18,378.49 $18,378.49 BYWOOD DR A0612 S/S GLENOAKS BLVD W/S BAILEY PL 4 83.10 87.79 2026 $18,649.42 $18,649.42 ERIN CT A1037 120' S/O ERIN CT SOUTH END 5 78.97 84.92 2026 $18,907.83 $18,907.83 CALLE DEL SOL A0637 W/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL NORTH END 5 77.63 83.96 2026 $18,930.90 $18,930.90 SALEM ST A2103 W/S COLUMBUS AVE E/S PACIFIC AVE 8 76.71 83.29 2026 $18,978.36 $18,978.36 CASTERA AVE A0688 S/S GLENCOE WAY E/S VERDUGO RD 6 80.33 85.87 2026 $19,199.85 $19,199.85 HOLLISTER TER A1372 W/S TRYON PL W/S EDWARDS PL 4 78.03 84.25 2026 $19,515.61 $19,515.61 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR A2182 E/S SLEEPY HOLLOW DR N/S VALLE VISTA DR 4 78.17 84.34 2026 $20,122.73 $20,122.73 HAMPSTEAD RD A1294A E/S SHEROOD PL EAST CITY LIMITS 5 81.30 86.54 2026 $20,183.38 $20,183.38 ELK AVE E A1010 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S LOUISE ST 1 79.65 85.39 2026 $20,193.27 $20,193.27 PORTOLA AVE A1977 N/S MONTEREY RD S/S CORONADO DR 7 79.23 85.10 2026 $20,634.27 $20,634.27 RANDALL ST A2010 W/S PAULA AVE E/S SONORA AVE 11 76.72 83.29 2026 $20,764.13 $20,764.13 JUSTIN AVE A1449 N/S GLENOAKS BLVD S/S GLENWOOD RD 10 79.81 85.50 2026 $22,191.96 $22,191.96 ARDEN AVE A0450 E/S CONCORD AVE W/S KENILWORTH AVE 9 79.25 85.11 2026 $24,499.82 $24,499.82 CALLE LA PRIMAVERA A0642 S/S CALLE FORTUNA SOUTH END 5 76.71 83.29 2026 $25,642.87 $25,642.87 BEN LOMOND DR A0514 N/S KENNETH RD S/S CUMBERLAND RD 9 77.64 83.97 2026 $28,010.06 $28,010.06 HAMPSTEAD RD A1294B E/S SHERWOOD PL EAST CITY LIMITS 5 79.38 85.20 2026 $28,071.36 $28,071.36 373 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget CALLE AMABLE A0630 S/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL WEST END 5 78.43 84.53 2026 $28,174.86 $28,174.86 BAYBERRY DR A0495 W/S EL ARBOLITA DR 262' W/O EL ARBOLITA DR 6 80.06 85.68 2026 $28,556.53 $28,556.53 CHESTNUT ST E A0736 W/S GLENDALE AVE E/S BRAND BLVD 1 81.42 86.62 2026 $32,565.13 $32,565.13 ASHINGTON DR A0467 S/S EMERALD ISLE DR WEST END 5 77.63 83.96 2026 $33,893.41 $33,893.41 EL ARBOLITA DR A0983 SOUTH END W/S BAYBERRY DR 6 80.47 85.96 2026 $36,199.95 $36,199.95 ORANGE GROVE AVE A1871 W/S VERDUGO RD E/S CHEVY CHASE DR 3 85.17 89.35 2026 $38,159.10 $38,159.10 PIEDMONT AVE A1956 N/S LEXINGTON DR DIVIDED RD NB 7 82.23 87.19 2026 $38,644.27 $38,644.27 FOOTHILL DR A1115 W/S ALLEN AVE E/S THURBER PL 10 59.89 100.00 2026 $0.00 $61,630.56 2026 Totals $1,320,390 $1,382,021
374 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget VASSAR AV A5065 BRAND BLVD S TOPOCK ST 1 85.93 89.99 2027 $4,320.32 $4,320.32 RAILROAD ST A1994 W/S GARDENA AVE W/S RAILROAD ST 1 85.03 89.23 2027 $7,416.45 $7,416.45 SUNSHINE DR A2244 W/S SANDRINGHAM DR N/S POLARIS DR 6 85.75 89.83 2027 $7,535.95 $7,535.95 JACKSON ST N A1432 E/S JACKSON ST E/S ISABEL ST 7 85.38 89.52 2027 $7,559.72 $7,559.72 GARDENA AVE A1144 N/S LOS FELIZ RD S/S SAN FERNANDO CT 1 85.38 89.52 2027 $7,982.72 $7,982.72 MAYNARD ST A1714 N/S HARVARD ST S/S BROADWAY 3 84.79 89.04 2027 $8,026.17 $8,026.17 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR A2180 S/S SLEEPY HOLLOW PL E/S HARLOW DR 4 84.69 88.97 2027 $9,430.97 $9,430.97 WESTERN AVE A2415 S/S RIVERSIDE DR S/S RANCHO AVE 11 85.15 89.33 2027 $10,523.44 $10,523.44 PAULA AVE A1940 S/S FAIRFIELD ST S/S GARDEN ST 11 85.38 89.52 2027 $11,422.41 $11,422.41 CRESTSHIRE DR A0870 W/S VIRDEN DR E/S SHERER LN 6 85.94 90.00 2027 $12,421.18 $12,421.18 EL BONITO AVE A0984 W/S SAN FERNANDO RD E/S GARDENA AVE 1 85.83 89.90 2027 $12,474.14 $12,474.14 WINDSOR RD E A2463 E/S LOS ANGELES ST W/S SAN FERNANDO RD 1 85.92 89.99 2027 $15,976.30 $15,976.30 MARIPOSA ST A1674 N/S CYPRESS ST S/S PALMER AVE 2 85.83 89.90 2027 $24,172.22 $24,172.22 SUNSHINE DR A2246 N/S SUNSHINE CT N/S POLARIS DR 6 85.86 89.93 2027 $33,614.73 $33,614.73 BARRINGTON WAY A0492 W/S LUKENS PL E/S VERDUGO RD 3 59.55 100.00 2027 $0.00 $81,721.81 KILDONAN DR A1503 N/S OLD PHILLIPS RD S/S OLD PHILLIPS RD 7 59.85 100.00 2027 $0.00 $151,301.51 SOUTH ST A2195 W/S PACIFIC AVE E/S KENILWORTH AVE 9 60.00 100.00 2027 $0.00 $226,854.13 EL MIRADERO AVE A0997 N/S BEL AIRE DR S/S MOUNTAIN ST 10 59.97 100.00 2027 $0.00 $231,516.83 CALLE DEL PACIFICO A0636 W/S CALLE BELLA S/S CAMINO SAN RAFAEL 5 59.83 100.00 2027 $0.00 $244,380.35 OLD PHILLIPS RD A1849 N/S KILDONAN DR 129' N/O KILMARY LN 7 59.51 100.00 2027 $0.00 $276,685.02 2027 Totals $172,877 $1,385,336
375 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget ARMOUR PL A0462 N/S WABASSO WAY NORTH END 6 79.88 85.55 2028 $4,419.86 $4,419.86 VERDUGO RD N A2339 S/S OPECHEE WAY SOUTH END 6 85.50 89.62 2028 $6,259.84 $6,259.84 SUNSHINE DR A2243 N/S SUNSHINE DR NORTH END 6 81.88 86.94 2028 $6,524.89 $6,524.89 BONITA DR A0528 S/S HILLSIDE DR SOUTH END 6 81.84 86.91 2028 $6,917.22 $6,917.22 WILSON TER A5070 SINCLAIR AVE RICHLAND AV 3 85.67 89.77 2028 $7,178.08 $7,178.08 TOPOCK ST A2298 E/S GARDENA AVE W/S VASSAR AVE 1 85.66 89.76 2028 $8,501.94 $8,501.94 FREDERICK ST A5042 ENCINAL AVE END 12 53.12 100.00 2028 $0.00 $10,233.47 HILLSIDE DR A1361 W/S NIODRARA DR W/S BONITA DR 6 80.88 86.24 2028 $11,035.66 $11,035.66 ANDENES DR A0431 E/S DESCANSO PL W/S HERMOSITA DR 6 82.45 87.34 2028 $13,938.65 $13,938.65 VIA SALDIVAR A2365 S/S SAN LUIS REY DR WEST END 6 84.33 88.69 2028 $16,868.90 $16,868.90 GARDENA AVE A1145 N/S CENTRAL AVE S/S LOS FELIZ RD 1 85.58 89.69 2028 $19,991.48 $19,991.48 WABASSO WAY A2400 E/S BONITA DR W/S CANADA BLVD 6 85.95 90.01 2028 $20,934.89 $20,934.89 WABASSO WAY A2398 N/S LA VISTA TER W/S BONITA DR 6 80.71 86.13 2028 $21,130.01 $21,130.01 CAPISTRANO AVE A0673 W/S HERMOSITA DR WEST END 6 85.59 89.70 2028 $23,165.10 $23,165.10 SPAZIER AVE A2206 N/S SAN FERNANDO RD S/S GLENOAKS BLVD 10 85.29 89.45 2028 $26,031.02 $26,031.02 SAN LUIS REY DR A2126 W/S OPECHEE WAY E/S VIA SALDIVAR 6 82.60 87.44 2028 $27,570.98 $27,570.98 RAYMOND AVE A2023 N/S COSMIC WAY S/S FLOWER ST 11 22.82 100.00 2028 $0.00 $54,838.96 GRAHAM PL A1254 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD SOUTH END 11 73.57 100.00 2028 $0.00 $68,470.93 VALLE VISTA DR A2321 E/S SLEEPY HOLLOW PL SOUTH END 4 59.94 100.00 2028 $0.00 $99,701.24 JUSTIN AVE A1452 S/S FLOWER ST N/S COSMIC WY 11 23.64 100.00 2028 $0.00 $118,943.66 THOMPSON AVE A2286 S/S FLOWER ST N/S COSMIC WAY 11 37.80 100.00 2028 $0.00 $120,332.41 IRVING AVE A1414 S/S FLOWER ST S/S COSMIC WAY 11 30.36 100.00 2028 $0.00 $120,776.81 ARISTO ST A0455 E/S DAVIS AVE W/S PAULA AVE 11 50.23 100.00 2028 $0.00 $131,431.30 BLOSSOM ST A0524 W/S PAULA AVE E/S DAVIS AVE 11 34.39 100.00 2028 $0.00 $131,431.30 TRUITT ST A2307 W/S PAULA AVE E/S DAVIS AVE 11 25.44 100.00 2028 $0.00 $131,431.30 IVY ST A1430 W/S COLUMBUS AVE E/S PACIFIC AVE 8 59.88 100.00 2028 $0.00 $136,788.70 RUBERTA AVE A2092 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD SOUTH END 11 26.52 100.00 2028 $0.00 $140,363.74 RUBERTA AVE A2093 N/S FLOWER ST NORTH END 11 43.18 100.00 2028 $0.00 $141,230.32 LOS OLIVOS LN A1619 W/S BOSTON AVE E/S MOORE ST 12 59.93 100.00 2028 $0.00 $143,421.61 JUSTIN AVE A1451 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD SOUTH END 11 3.46 100.00 2028 $0.00 $144,063.37 FREDERICK ST A1134 N/S BROOKHILL ST S/S MARKRIDGE RD 12 59.93 100.00 2028 $0.00 $156,173.84 KILDONAN DR A1504 S/S OLD PHILLIPS RD S/S SUNSHINE DR 7 59.60 100.00 2028 $0.00 $160,266.14 376 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget CIRCLE SEVEN DR A5028 MIDPOINT END 11 76.98 100.00 2028 $0.00 $175,837.97 THOMPSON AVE A2285 N/S FLOWER ST NORTH END 11 50.83 100.00 2028 $0.00 $185,481.45 CLEVELAND RD A0782 N/S KENNETH RD S/S CUMBERLAND RD 9 59.51 100.00 2028 $0.00 $206,335.89 OAK CIRCLE DR A1822 E/S OAK CIRCLE DR S/S OAK CIRCLE DR 6 59.54 100.00 2028 $0.00 $248,105.73 COSMIC WAY A0854 E/S RAYMOND AVE E/S IRVING AVE 11 11.76 100.00 2028 $0.00 $257,129.84 HAZEL ST A1318 N/S COSMIC WAY S/S FLOWER ST 11 64.39 100.00 2028 $0.00 $268,695.35 COSMIC WAY A0852 W/S PAULA AVE W/S HAZEL ST 11 22.46 100.00 2028 $0.00 $269,895.23 COSMIC WAY A0853 E/S RUBERTA AVE E/S WINCHESTER AVE 11 16.76 100.00 2028 $0.00 $274,794.74 DAVIS AVE A0899 N/S COSMIC WAY S/S FLOWER ST 11 23.09 100.00 2028 $0.00 $284,438.22 DANA ST A0892 W/S THOMPSON AVE E/S ALLEN AVE 11 30.15 100.00 2028 $0.00 $319,845.79 CIRCLE SEVEN DR A0776 S/S FLOWER ST MIDPOINT 11 52.25 100.00 2028 $0.00 $328,856.00 GRANDVIEW AVE A1266 N/S FLOWER ST S/S GRAND CENTRAL AVE 11 14.56 100.00 2028 $0.00 $409,847.90 PAULA AVE A1939 S/S FLOWER ST S/S COSMIC WAY 11 38.28 100.00 2028 $0.00 $510,437.84 GRAND CENTRAL AVE A1258 W/S FLOWER ST E/S GRANDVIEW AVE 11 19.06 100.00 2028 $0.00 $799,331.17 GRAND CENTRAL AVE A1257 E/S GRANDVIEW AVE E/S SONORA AVE 11 30.69 100.00 2028 $0.00 $1,573,498.19 2028 Totals $220,469 $8,342,899
377 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget BROOK LN A0579 W/S VERDUGO RD WEST END 6 68.36 76.70 2029 $2,611.18 $2,611.18 SELVAS PL A2152 W/S OPECHEE WAY WEST END 6 84.71 88.99 2029 $3,422.99 $3,422.99 LOS ANGELES ST A1608 S/S GARFIELD AVE SOUTH END 1 85.11 89.30 2029 $3,477.01 $3,477.01 PICKENS ST A1955B W/S ROSEMONT AVE E/S RAYMOND AVE 12 85.44 89.57 2029 $4,295.30 $4,295.30 ROSSLYN ST A2077 E/S SAN FERNANDO RD EAST END 1 84.69 88.97 2029 $4,350.04 $4,350.04 LA LOMA RD A1525 N/S CHEVY CHASE DR E/S WOODBURY RD 4 73.44 80.82 2029 $5,373.63 $5,373.63 COLUMBUS AVE N A0809 S/S BURCHETT ST SOUTH END 9 84.69 88.97 2029 $5,442.06 $5,442.06 ARUNDLE PL A0464 N/S EDGEWICK RD NORTH END 5 71.59 79.35 2029 $5,917.47 $5,917.47 CORWIN AVE A0850 N/S CHEVY CHASE DR E/S GLENMORE BLVD 4 71.86 79.58 2029 $8,113.74 $8,113.74 WABASSO WAY A2397 S/S OPECHEE WAY N/S LA VISTA TER 6 85.14 89.32 2029 $8,230.44 $8,230.44 SAN LUIS REY DR A2125 E/S VIA SALDIVAR WEST END 6 84.71 88.99 2029 $8,384.59 $8,384.59 COLINA DR A0791 S/S HILLSIDE DR SOUTH END 6 85.44 89.58 2029 $9,035.76 $9,035.76 BONITA DR A0532 N/S CAPISTRANO AVE S/S EL RITO AVE 6 84.71 88.99 2029 $9,069.62 $9,069.62 HOWARD ST A1391 N/S DORAN ST N/S MAURITA PL 7 84.70 88.98 2029 $10,102.56 $10,102.56 PARK PL A1920 N/S VERDUGO BLVD CITY LIMITS 6 84.97 89.19 2029 $11,203.22 $11,203.22 OAK GLEN RD A1823 N/S OAKWOOD AVE NORTH END 6 84.53 88.84 2029 $11,382.58 $11,382.58 RISA DR A2046 N/S BARA RD S/S CALAFIA ST 6 64.44 73.30 2029 $11,590.76 $11,590.76 KENILWORTH AVE N A1477 N/S RIVERDALE DR S/S VINE ST 1 85.99 90.05 2029 $13,271.99 $13,271.99 SHERLOCK DR A2160A N/S MOUNTAIN ST CITY LIMITS 10 84.62 88.92 2029 $13,569.49 $13,569.49 ANDENES DR A0430 E/S DESCANSO PL W/S CAPISTRANO AVE 6 84.53 88.85 2029 $13,589.66 $13,589.66 COLINA DR A0792 N/S SUNSHINE DR NORTH END 6 84.79 89.05 2029 $15,907.67 $15,907.67 BURCHETT ST A0600 E/S KENILWORTH AVE W/S PACIFIC AVE 9 84.69 88.97 2029 $16,275.75 $16,275.75 HENRIETTA ST A1323 W/S FREDERICK AVE E/S DUNSMORE AVE 12 70.86 78.77 2029 $16,564.60 $16,564.60 ROSITA DR A2075 E/S VERDUGO RD E/S VERDUGO RD 6 69.87 77.96 2029 $16,676.25 $16,676.25 EL RITO AVE A1001 W/S HERMOSITA DR E/S CAPISTRANO AVE 6 84.62 88.92 2029 $16,779.98 $16,779.98 HERMOSA AVE A1330 W/S PLEASURE WAY E/S LA CRESCENTA AVE 12 65.54 74.27 2029 $18,410.08 $18,410.08 GLADYS DR A1171 E/S LURING DR NORTH END 4 66.53 75.13 2029 $18,826.42 $18,826.42 LOMA VISTA DR A1590 N/S SHERER LN NORTH END 6 73.71 81.03 2029 $19,408.45 $19,408.45 ELK AVE E A1016 W/S BRAND BLVD E/S CENTRAL AVE 1 72.84 80.35 2029 $20,211.61 $20,211.61 VALDERAS DR A2316 E/S CLIFTON PL EAST END 6 79.65 85.39 2029 $20,736.01 $20,736.01 NORTON AVE A1817 N/S OLMSTED DR S/S KENNETH RD 9 85.43 89.56 2029 $20,818.84 $20,818.84 LOS ANGELES ST A1607 N/S GARFIELD AVE S/S SAN FERNANDO RD 1 85.11 89.30 2029 $21,321.63 $21,321.63 378 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global Funded Global, M&R & Planned
Total
Glendale, CA - Residential Roads - $1.387M Given Budget CAMULOS AVE A0664 W/S CANADA BLVD E/S BONITA DR 6 84.71 88.99 2029 $22,176.66 $22,176.66 NIODRARA DR A1811 N/S COLINA DR S/S HILLSIDE DR 6 85.84 89.92 2029 $23,023.04 $23,023.04 OPECHEE WAY A1863 E/S DESCANSO PL W/S ANDENES DR 6 85.73 89.82 2029 $23,856.46 $23,856.46 MILLS AVE A1748 W/S PENNSYLVANIA AVE E/S NEW YORK AVE 12 69.45 77.61 2029 $28,414.67 $28,414.67 BURCHETT ST A0602 W/S CENTRAL AVE E/S COLUMBUS AVE 9 85.35 89.50 2029 $30,068.54 $30,068.54 TRIANGLE PL A2306 S/S ARLINGTON AVE W/S VERDUGO RD 6 59.66 100.00 2029 $0.00 $67,531.09 FAIRESTA ST A1064 W/S NEW YORK AVE WEST END 12 59.64 100.00 2029 $0.00 $102,984.91 PENNERTON DR A1944 N/S GARDNER PL EAST END 4 59.76 100.00 2029 $0.00 $111,640.15 ENCINAL AVE A1033 W/S DUNSMORE AVE E/S LAUDERDALE AVE 12 59.77 100.00 2029 $0.00 $120,582.39 MARYANN ST A1682 W/S NEW YORK AVE WEST END 12 59.97 100.00 2029 $0.00 $122,068.07 FAIRMOUNT AVE A1072 E/S NEW YORK AVE W/S PONTIAC ST 12 59.77 100.00 2029 $0.00 $129,338.92 GARFIELD AVE E A1158 E/S BRAND BLVD W/S GLENDALE AVE 1 59.83 100.00 2029 $0.00 $211,664.95 2029 Totals $511,911 $1,377,721
379 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone Avg Of Condition Before Avg Of Condition After Work YearGlobal Funded Global, M&R & Planned Total
ALLEY 018 A0084 S/S WINDSOR RD N/S GARFIELD AVE 1 68.10 77.97 2025 $2,816.00 $2,816.00 ALLEY 035 A0117 S/S EULALIA ST 120' S/O EULALIA ST 1 71.42 80.95 2025 $1,166.72 $1,166.72 ALLEY 035 A5006 120' S/O EULALIA ST 120' S/O EULALIA ST 1 67.11 77.11 2025 $2,348.80 $2,348.80 ALLEY 037 A0122 S/S CERRITOS AVE W/S ALLEY 77 1 74.15 83.44 2025 $3,639.68 $3,639.68 ALLEY 077 A0202 S/S CERRITOS AVE W/S BRAND BLVD 1 70.89 80.47 2025 $6,090.24 $6,090.24 ALLEY 233 A0352 S/S DORAN ST SOUTH END 8 76.45 85.51 2025 $2,718.72 $2,718.72 ALLEY 249 A0368 S/S BURCHETT ST SOUTH END 9 79.39 88.08 2025 $1,977.60 $1,977.60 2025 Totals $20,758 $20,758
ALLEY 034 A0115 S/S LAUREL ST N/S EULALIA ST 1 54.81 100.00 2026 $0.00 $28,273.74 2026 Totals $0 $28,274
ALLEY 226 A5012 LOUISE ST N KENWOOD ST N 3 83.34 91.27 2027 $4,128.85 $4,128.85 ALLEY 298 A0412 N/S HILLSIDE DR NORTH END 6 42.87 100.00 2027 $0.00 $17,638.22 2027 Totals $4,129 $21,767
ALLEY 012 A0071 N/S FLOWER ST END 11 58.69 100.00 2028 $0.00 $100,878.80 ALLEY 286 A0403 W/S WICKHAM WY WEST END 6 31.02 100.00 2028 $0.00 $25,880.85 2028 Totals $0 $126,760
ALLEY 017 A0082 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD N/S WINDSOR RD 1 53.55 100.00 2029 $0.00 $23,939.77 2029 Totals $0 $23,940
Glendale, CA - Asphalt Alleys - $31K Given Budget
380 of 383
BranchName Section ID From To Maintenance
Zone
Avg Of
Condition
Before
Avg Of
Condition
After
Work Year Global FundedGlobal, M&R &
Planned Total
E GLENOAKS BLVD A1216 80' W/O CHEVY CHASE DR W/S CHEVY CHASE DR 4 30.20 100.00 2025 $0.00 $100,023.01 ZINNIA LN A2478 N/S MAPLE ST S/S ROCK GLEN AVE 3 31.58 100.00 2025 $0.00 $105,067.23 HALE ST A1291 E/S THOMPSON AVE W/S WESTERN AVE 11 45.67 100.00 2025 $0.00 $119,976.80 2025 Totals $0 $325,067
BURRITT WAY A0607 25' W/O CAROLYN WAY 50' E/O CAROLYN WAY 12 49.84 100.00 2026 $0.00 $79,954.08 2026 Totals $0 $79,954
ROHR ST A2062 450' N/O VALENTINE DR S/S HILLCREST AVE 9 48.47 100.00 2027 $0.00 $89,742.88 2027 Totals $0 $89,743
ALLEY 263 A0381 E/S ALLEN AVE W/S THOMPSON AVE 11 65.37 100.00 2028 $0.00 $120,965.68 VICKERS DR A2370 E/S SPARR BLVD 112' E/O SPARR BLVD 6 17.39 100.00 2028 $0.00 $121,571.55 ALLEY 024 A0094 W/S SONORA AVE E/S RUBERTA AVE 11 79.68 100.00 2028 $0.00 $134,975.39 LINDEN AVE A1584 S/S SAN FERNANDO RD SOUTH END 11 .00 100.00 2028 $0.00 $364,330.23 2028 Totals $0 $741,843
MENLO DR A1728 E/S SPARR BLVD 164' E/O SPARR BLVD 6 1.65 100.00 2029 $0.00 $123,755.68 2029 Totals $0 $123,756
Glendale, CA - Concrete Pavements - $144K Given Budget
381 of 383
City of Glendale - Public Works DepartmentExhibit 2: List of Past 5-Year CIP Projects with Pavement ImprovementsNo. Project Name Completed DateConstruction Cost1 Pennsylvania Ave. Rehabilitation Project 10/30/2020 $2,348,0202 Highland Ave. Rehabilitation Project 10/19/2020 $2,369,8443 FY 19-20 ADA Improvements and Citywide Crack Seal Program 2/8/2021 $925,6514 San Fernando Rd. Rehabilitation Phase 3 and Adjacent St. Improvements Project 6/22/2021 $3,501,2705 Colorado Street and Columbus Avenue Rehabilitation Project 10/4/2021 $2,198,9606 Verdugo Blvd. Rehabilitation Project 3/30/2022 $2,776,0827 FY 2020-21 ADA Improvement and Crack Seal Program 4/13/2022 $672,9718 Fiscal Year 2020-21 Street Resurfacing Project 6/30/2022 $4,039,5059Glendale Train Station 1st/Last Mile Regional Improvements Project7/19/2022 $3,355,73910 Maintenance District 6 Pavement Rehabilitation Phase I Project 6/22/2023 $4,338,71811 Broadway Rehabilitation Project 7/17/2023 $4,091,43212Honolulu Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue at Montrose Avenue Traffic Signal Modification Project3/1/2024 $4,330,65013 Permeable Alley Project 6/30/2024 $6,328,41914 FY 2022-23 Slurry Seal and Crack Seal Program 9/23/2024 $2,882,655Page 1 of 2 382 of 383
City of Glendale - Public Works DepartmentExhibit 2: List of Past 5-Year CIP Projects with Pavement ImprovementsNo. Project Name Completed DateConstruction Cost15 San Fernando Road Beautification Project - Phase I 9/30/2024 $13,244,32016 Palmer Street and Green Street Improvements Project 10/3/2024 $1,395,88917 Community Beautification Project 10/25/2024 $8,075,96918 Viewcrest Road Pavement and Slope Repair Project 8/4/2025 $2,553,63319 West Glendale ADA Curb Ramp and Sidewalk Repair Program Phase I 1/23/2026 $4,128,18920 La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project 6/30/2026 $14,401,23021 Maintenance District 6 Pavement Rehabilitation Project Phase II 6/30/2026 $8,925,563TOTAL DELIVERED 96,884,709$ Page 2 of 2 383 of 383