Agenda packet, closed session — Glendale City Council, April 28, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
APRIL 28, 2026
– 6:00 PM
Closed Session- 3:00 PM
Regular Business- 6:00 PM

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

PLEASE SILENCE CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION Viewing of City Council Meetings
:
•
In-person – City Council Chambers, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 •
Live Broadcast via Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U-verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed on the City webpage, glendaleca.gov/live
, on
YouTube.com/myglendale
, and on the Cablecast app under "Glendale TV". Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at
glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

City Council meeting agenda packets, any agenda related documents, and additional documents are available at City Hall and online for public viewing on the City’s website:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/public-meeting-portal ADA Accessibility and Translation Services
:

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

The

City

Clerk’

office

should

notified

72 hours

(three
business

days)

soon

practicable

for

requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and
Braille

transcription

services;

please

direct

all

accessibility

requests

(818)

548-2090.

For
translations,

please

specify

the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

of
City

provided

interpreters

not

required

and

persons

are

welcome

use

their

own

interpreter

or
speak in their native language.

Public participation in Council meetings may occur as follows :
•
In-person – City Council Chambers
•
T elephonic participation: Call (818) 937-8100
If you have any questions about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance including agenda email notification, please contact the City Clerk’s Office via email at [email protected], or by phone at (818) 548-2090.

1 TYPED 4/24/2026 4:13:20 PM
04 28 26
CC

PUBLIC COMMENT GUIDELINES
The City Council welcomes public input at City Council meetings. Public input at Council meetings is regulated by the City Council’s Rules of Order, Procedure and Decorum for the Conduct of City Council Meetings as set forth in Resolution No. 25-76, which will be summarized below.

Written Comments and Documents
:

Public comments received in writing will NOT be read aloud at the meeting but will be part of the meeting record. Written public comments can be emailed to [email protected], and will be uploaded to the City website as an attachment to the agenda item. When submitting a public comment, please make sure to include the following
:

1. Name (optional); and

2. Agenda item to which you are submitting public comment

3. Submit no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the City Council meeting. Correspondence received after this time may not be distributed until the following business day.

All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Public Comments During Council Meeting
:

Public Comments during Community Event Announcements, First and Second Periods of Oral Communications and agenda items will be governed as provided in the descriptions for those items on the agenda below. Pursuant to State law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on any item not appearing on the meeting agenda, except that members of the City Council or staff may ask a question for clarification or briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising public testimony rights (Government Code Section 54954.2). Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

Submitting Speaker Cards or Calling In for Public Comment :

Speaker cards must be submitted and telephonic participants must call in and be in the call-in queue as follows:
•
Community Event Announcements or First or Second Period of Oral Communications: PRIOR TO the commencement of the specific comment period
•
Consent Calendar Items: BEFORE a motion is made on the consent calendar •
Other agenda items, including Action items: PRIOR to the completion of the verbal staff report (unless waived by the Mayor)
Any audio-visual files displayed by speakers must be emailed to the Clerk’s office by 12:00 pm on the day before a Council meeting.

2 TYPED 4/24/2026 4:13:20 PM
04 28 26
CC

APRIL 28, 2026
– 6:00 PM
Closed Session- 3:00 PM
Regular Business- 6:00 PM
Revised- Item 2a Deleted, Item 9a Added
Item 10c moved to Consent now 5d

ROLL CALL

1. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

2. CLOSED SESSION
– 1:00 PM (T o Commence at 3:00 PM
)
a.

Public Employment - Attorneys

3. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
– 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a.

Flag Salute:

Mayor Ardy Kassakhian
b.

Invocation:

City Clerk, Dr. Suzie Abajian
c.

Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 28, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on April 23, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.

Pasadena Humane – Adopt a Pet

City Clerk, re:

Minutes of the City Council Meetings of March 3, 2026, March 10, 2026 , March 24, 2026, March 31, 2026 and April 14, 2026. b.

Public Works, re:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List for Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017

1. Resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List, the Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017
c.

Community Services and Parks, re: Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) Amendment No. 2 from Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department for revised FY 2025-26 Modernizing Older Californians Act (MOCA) funding allocation

1. Motion to authorize the transfer of $31,800 in ENP MOCA funds from Congregate Meals program (C1) to Home Delivered Meals program (C2) from Los Angeles County AD for FY 2025-26; and authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to Subaward ENP252604, period July 2025 – June 2026, to revise and transfer funding

2. Resolution of Appropriation to reprogram $31,800 of MOCA Congregate Meals Program C1 to ENP MOCA C2 Home Delivered Meals Program
d.

Public Works, re:

Award Professional Services Agreements (PSA) for On-Call Services for Facilities Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) for the Public Works Department.

3 TYPED 4/24/2026 4:13:20 PM
04 28 26
CC

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute PSAs for an initial three-year duration from the date of the contract execution, with an option to extend each PSA annually for up to two (2) additional years, and to execute any necessary amendments thereto, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, for an aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $3,600,000 to be shared among the consultant PSAs with the following firms in their respective disciplines:
a. Carrier Johnson + Culture, Struere, Westgroup Designs, Inc., Malekian & Associates, Inc., PracticeLA, Albert Group Architects, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and Infrastructure Architects, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Architectural Services
b. EPTDESIGN and Albert A. Webb Associates, to provide On-Call Professional Landscape Architectural Services
c. CWE, Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Civil Engineering Services
d. John A. Martin & Associates, Inc., DCI Engineers, and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Structural Engineering Services e. Budlong & Associates, Inc. and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Electrical, Mechanical, and Plumbing Engineering Services f. Citadel CPM, Inc., Cumming Management Group, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Maestro Development, LLC, and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Project Management Services
g. Maestro Development, LLC, Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, Cumming Management Group, Inc., Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., and CLMI Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Construction Management Services
h. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., and Maestro Development, LLC in partnership with The Anaheim Group (TAG), to provide On-Call Professional Inspection Services
i. Cumming Management Group, Inc. and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Cost Estimating Services
j. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Quality Assurance and Quality Control Services
k. Maestro Development, LLC in partnership with 3QC, and Cumming Management Group, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Commissioning Services
l. Carrier Johnson + Culture, to provide On-Call Professional Specification Writing Services
m. Carrier Johnson + Culture, to provide On-Call Professional Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Services
n. CLMI Group, LLC, Cumming Management Group, Inc., Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Staff Augmentation Services

6. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
(Including reports from conferences and regional
meetings)

7. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
(3-minutes per speaker)
Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the

4 TYPED 4/24/2026 4:13:20 PM
04 28 26
CC

community.

8. FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute
aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

9. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.

Public Works, re:

Adoption of Ordinance Amending Sections 10.40.110 and

10.40.120 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, Relating to Parking Meters, and Fixing the Parking Meter Rates for Certain Zones (Najarian, 04/21/2026)

10. ACTION ITEMS
a.

Glendale Water and Power, re: Award of Contracts to Ferguson Enterprises, LLC and Willdan Engineering Inc. for Glendale Water and Power’s (GWP) Water Advanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) System Replacement Project

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC, for the City’s Water AMI System Replacement Project, RFP No. 4017 in the not-to-exceed amount of $24,073,982, plus a ten (10%) contingency in the amount of $2,407,398 for the design and implementation of the Water AMI System and software maintenance and support for the first year. The City Manager, or his designee, is further authorized to enter into and execute an amendment with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC for four additional years of software support and maintenance, at the not-to-exceed amount of $199,075 to provide continued software support and maintenance for the Water AMI System. Any subsequent software support and maintenance with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC beyond the first five years shall be approved as part of the annual city-wide budget process

2. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter and execute a Professional Service Agreement (PSA) with Willdan Engineering Inc., California for construction inspection services related to the City’s Water AMI System Replacement Project, in the amount of $462,400
b.

Public Works, re:

Doran Street Grade Separation Project Dedications and
Maintenance Agreements

1. Resolution dedicating a portion of city-owned property for public street and ramp purposes and accepting the same into the city street system

2. Resolution dedicating a portion of city-owned property to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain purposes

3. Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a citywide master freeway maintenance agreement with Caltrans

4. Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute an operations and maintenance agreement with the City of Los Angeles
c.

Public Works, re:

The Public Works Department (PWD) Pavement Management
Program (PMP) -2025 Update

1. Motion to note and file the PMP Report

5 TYPED 4/24/2026 4:13:20 PM
04 28 26
CC

11. HEARINGS

12. REPORTS - INFORMATION

13. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

14. SECOND PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to items NOT a part of this agenda. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes.

Council may question or respond to the speaker, but there will be no debate or decision. The City Manager may refer the matter to the appropriate department for investigation and report.

15. NEW BUSINESS

16. ADJOURNMENT

6 TYPED 4/24/2026 4:13:20 PM
04 28 26
CC

1 03 03 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MARCH 3, 2026
ROLL CALL – All Present

1.DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

2.CLOSED SESSION – 4:07 PM
a.Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Reed v. City of Glendale, et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 23GDCV01624
City Attorney Michael Garcia stated that the Council anticipates reporting out on item 2a.

Council recessed to Closed Session at 4:08 PM.

3.REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:02 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a.Flag Salute: Mayor Najarian
b.Invocation: Delivered by Steve Wiebe, Senior Pastor, Glendale Presbyterian Church
c.Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 3, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on February 26, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4.PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.Proclamation-Autoimmune Awareness Month
b.Women’s History Month and International Women’s Day Proclamation Proclamation accepted by Louisa Sharamatryan and Clara Tavarez, Glendale Sister Cities Committee; Leona Khachaturian and Emma Park, City of Glendale Commission on the Status of Women (CSW)

2 03 03 26 CC
a.City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Glendale City Council meeting of January 27, 2026
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

6.CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Gharpetian attended the groundbreaking ceremony for the Incarnation Church Parish Hall, the Glendale Police Department and GTV screening of the film Dirty Drugs regarding the fentanyl epidemic, and a book presentation by internationally known soccer player Yura Movsisyan.

Councilmember Kassakhian also attended the Incarnation Parish groundbreaking and the Dirty Drugs film screening. He also attended the ReflectSpace opening reception for an exhibition titled Dreams Gather Here.

Councilmember Asatryan expressed concerns about the delay in implementing AB 91.

Councilmember Brotman noted an adaptive reuse project at 101 North Brand, where an office building is being converted into residential housing, and would like the City to explore how Glendale can learn from other cities to encourage more projects of this type. He also noted ICE activities in Glendale and would like to discuss the possibility of ICE-free zones on public property.

Mayor Najarian shared that Metro held its virtual meeting on the BRT last week, and that the in-person meeting will be held on March 9, 2026, at the Fremont Park Community Room from 6:00 to 7:30 PM. Information on the BRT is also available on the City of Glendale website.

City Clerk Dr. Abajian shared that, regarding the June 2, 2026 election, the nomination period for all candidates ends on March 6, 2026. If an incumbent does not file, the deadline for impacted races will be extended to March 11, 2026.

Election information can be found at glendalevotes.org or by calling the City Clerk’s Office.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 6:25 PM and returned at 6:26 PM. 8 of 383

3 03 03 26 CC

7.COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

Brenda Rees
Mike Mohill
Beth Brooks

8.FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Mike Borisov
Tony Passarella
Elise Kalfayan
Tamara Moresyan
Ejmin Hakobian
Ramy
Staff Comments:

Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 6:45 PM and returned at 6:48 PM.

9.ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

10.ACTION ITEMS
a.Human Resources, re: Approval of Revisions to the Executive Benefits and Compensation Resolution for CalPERS
Compliance
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer
9 of 383

4 03 03 26 CC

1.Resolution [26-21] Providing for Supplementary Benefits and Compensation of Certain Officers and Executive Employees Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b.Public Works, re: Award Construction Contract for the Central Park Block Project
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Sarkis Oganesyan, Assistant Director/City Engineer, Public Works Department
Public Speakers:

Ejmin Hakobian
Mike Borisov

1.Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with ARC Construction, Inc. for the Central Park Block Project in the amount of $12,680,138, plus a construction reserve of 15% in the amount $1,902,021

2.Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Maestro Development, LLC, to provide construction management services for the Central Park Block Project in an amount not-to-exceed $750,000

3.Resolution [26-22] of appropriation to appropriate funds for the Central Park Block Project
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
10 of 383

5 03 03 26 CC
c.Public Works, re: Scholl Canyon Landfill Operations, Closure, and Wasteshed Analysis Update
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Sarkis Oganesyan, Assistant Director/City Engineer, Public Works Department
Presentation:

Luke Chen, Senior Civil Engineer, Public Works Department Raymond Huff, SCS Engineers
Public Speakers:

Jackie Gish
Justin King
Ejmin Hakobian
Allen Dish
Marie Freeman

1.Motion authorizing the Director of Public Works to formally request an adjustment of refuse disposal rates at the Scholl Canyon Landfill (SCLF) active site based on the inside wasteshed 10% discount scenario, consistent with the requirements of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), subject to consultation with and concurrence by the County Sanitation District (District) and the County of Los Angeles (County)

2.Motion authorizing the Director of Public Works to formally request the District to resubmit the SCS-revised postclosure cost estimate to CalRecycle and other oversight authorities for approval

3.Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute a contract amendment to Contract No. 8002842 with SCS Engineers, to increase the contract amount by $30,000 to perform post-closure maintenance updates, provide regulatory support with CalRecycle, and site usage planning
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
11 of 383

6 03 03 26 CC
Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 7:27 PM and returned during the presentation.
d.Community Development, re: Status of and proposed options for SB 79 (the Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act), and proposed amendment to the existing De Novo Planning Group Professional Service Agreement (Contract No. 8000769) to address potential development associated with SB 79
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Presentation:

Teresa Santilena, Principal Planner, Community Development Department Public Speakers:

Susan Wolfson
Mike Borisov
Angela Miller
Mike Mohill
GiGi Garcia
Ejmin Hakobian
Allen Dish
Beth Brooks
Elizabeth Bax
Glendale YIMBY
Jacob Pierce
Ramy
Davit Mnatsakanyan
Patrick Masihi

1.Motion to accept the status report and direct staff to proceed with one or more implementation options identified in the report; [Option 3]

2.Motion to amend De Novo Planning Group’s professional service agreement to assist with the detailed parcel-by-parcel analysis and update the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Draft Land Use, Mobility, and Environmental Justice Elements of the General Plan to address the potential development associated with SB 79 and extend the timeline an additional nine months
12 of 383

7 03 03 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Kassakhian, Najarian
Noes: Gharpetian

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 8:40 PM and returned during the presentation.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:11 PM and returned at 9:16 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:34 PM and returned at 9:47 PM.

11.HEARINGS

12.REPORTS - INFORMATION

13.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

14.SECOND PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to items NOT a part of this agenda. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes. Council may question or respond to the speaker, but there will be no debate or decision. The City Manager may refer the matter to the appropriate department for investigation and report.

Beth Brooks
Mike Mohill
Malcolm Johnson
Mrs. Valentine
Damian
Allen Dish
Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 10:17 PM and returned at 10:24 PM. 13 of 383

8 03 03 26 CC

15.NEW BUSINESS
Councilmember Kassakhian moved that the City Attorney is authorized to resolve the lawsuit entitled Kia Nicole Reed v. City of Glendale, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23GDCV01149 in exchange for a full release of all claims in the amount of $140,000.

Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

16.ADJOURNMENT in the memory of Captain Cody Khork, Sergeant Nicole Amor, Sergeant Declan Coady, and Sergeant Noah Tietjens – 10:41 PM Moved: Najarian Seconded: Gharpetian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
14 of 383

1 03 10 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MARCH 10, 2026
Revised Item 1a
ROLL CALL – Absent: Kassakhian (arrived at 4:44 PM)

1.DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS - 4:09 PM
a.Request by the City Council to Agendize a Discussion to Consider Submitting a Letter to Los Angeles Metro to Conduct Subsequent Environmental Reviews under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Based on the Impacts from SB 79
Councilmember Gharpetian announced he was required to recuse himself from this item, due to his leased office location being on the route of the BRT.

Councilmember Kassakhian arrived after the item was discussed, and announced that he was required to recuse himself from this item due to his home being located within 500 feet of the proposed BRT line.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Public Speakers:

Patrick Murphy
Fernando Roldan
Motion to consider a letter to exempt the BRT from SB 79.

Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: Gharpetian (recused), Kassakhian (recused)
Abstain: None
15 of 383

2 03 10 26 CC
Motion to consider a letter requesting a new EIR in light of SB 79.

Motion made by Councilmember Asatryan. There was no second for this motion.

Councilmember Gharpetian recused himself and stepped away at 4:22 PM and returned at 4:39 PM.
b.Request by Councilmember Asatryan to Agendize a Discussion to Consider Establishing a Policy to Include Certain Demographic Information Data Collection/ Armenian Checkbox on City Forms Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Kassakhian
c.Request by Councilmember Brotman to Agendize a
Discussion to Consider Establishing Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) Free Zone
Staff Comments:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Motion made by Councilmember Brotman. There was no second for this motion.

Direction was given for the City Attorney’s Office to produce a memo on this issue.

Council recessed at 5:08 PM.

2.CLOSED SESSION – No Scheduled Closed Session

3.REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:20 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a.Flag Salute: Mayor Najarian
b.Invocation: Delivered by Brother Govindananda, Self-Realization Fellowship c.Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 10, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on March 5, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall. 16 of 383

3 03 10 26 CC

4.PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.Mayor’s Commendation to Consul General of Armenia
Received by the Honorable Anna Avetisyan, Consul General of Armenia b.Mayor’s Commendation to Consul General of the Dominican Republic Received by Honorable Alfonso Rodriguez, Consul General of the Dominican Republic
c.Mayor’s Commendation to Consul General of Japan
Received by the Honorable Murota Kosei, Consul General of Japan d.Mayor’s Commendation to Consul General of Korea
Received by the Honorable Kim Youngwan, Consul General of Korea e.Mayor’s Commendation to Consul General of Mexico
Received by Chief of Staff Luis Angel Castaneda for the Honorable Carlos Gonzalez Gutierrez, Consul General of Mexico
f.Mayor’s Commendation to Consul General of the Philippines Received by the Honorable Adelio Angelito S. Cruz, Consul General of the Philippines
g.Mayor’s Medal of Honors
Accepted by representatives from the Porto’s family, ABC 7, and Ara Kalfayan
h.Proclamation National Kidney Month Proclamation
Accepted by Evan Schneider on behalf of the Bruin Beans Health Club & Core Kidney at UCLA

1.Resolution [26-23] declaring that noxious weeds on certain properties are a public nuisance; that the City intends to cause abatement by removal; that a hearing will be held on March 24, 2026, for objections to removal
17 of 383

4 03 10 26 CC
c.Glendale Water and Power, re: Contract Award to General Pump Company, Inc. for the Glendale High Recycled Water Booster Pump and Motor No. 2 Repair Project (Specification No. 4032)

1.Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter and execute a contract with General Pump Company, Inc. (General Pump) of San Dimas, California for the Glendale High Recycled Water Booster Pump and Motor No. 2 Repair Project, Specification No. 4032, in the amount of $89,550 plus a ten (10%) percent contingency of $8,955

2.Resolution [26-24] of Appropriation
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:09 PM and returned at 7:10 PM.

6.CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Asatryan wished everyone a happy International Women’s Day and thanked Glendale’s Sister Cities Committee for helping organize a gathering for women. She suggested that planning should begin soon if an event is to be held next year in collaboration with the Downtown Glendale Association. She also noted that a commemoration was held over the past weekend at the Korean Comfort Women’s Monument.

7.COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

Delilah Shahbazian
Mike Belzer
Mike Mohill
Beth Brooks
Allan Durham
Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 7:17 PM and returned at 7:20 PM. 18 of 383

5 03 10 26 CC

8.FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Muhammad Yameen
Les Hammer
Carmen Cloos
Mike Mohill
Andranik Tsaturyan
Herbert Molano
Jay
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:33 PM and returned at 7:43 PM.

9.ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

10.ACTION ITEMS
a.Management Services, re: Sister Cities Program Annual Report Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presentation:

Ani Avanesyan, Senior Administrative Analyst, Management Services Public Speakers:

Palmira Najarian, Juan Guillermo Garcia, and Irma Villegas Clara Tavarez
Louisa Sharamatyan
Nora Yacoubian
19 of 383

6 03 10 26 CC

1.Motion to Note and File Annual Report

2.Motion Directing Staff on Hosting a Cultural Event
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b.Finance, re: Fiscal Year 2025-26 Second Quarter Financial Status Report Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
Presentation:

Jack Liang, Director, Finance Department
Karina Cervantes-Vazquez, Deputy Director, Finance Department Public Speakers:

Herbert Molano

1.Motion to note and file the Financial Status Report for the period ending December 31, 2025

2.Resolution [26-25] of appropriation
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 8:31 PM and returned at 8:39 PM. 20 of 383

7 03 10 26 CC
c.Glendale Water and Power, re: Introduction of the Ordinance Authorizing Issuance of Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Public Speakers:

Herbert Molano

1.Introduction of the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $45,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of City of Glendale Electric Revenue Bonds,2026 Refunding Series, and approving certain other actions in connection therewith
Introduced by Councilmember Brotman on March 10, 2026.
d.Glendale Water and Power, re: Authorization to enter into a Legal Services Agreement with Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, and a Professional Services Agreement with Public Financial Management Financial Advisors, LLC
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Adrine Isayan, Assistant General Manager – Utility Finance & Risk Management, Glendale Water and Power

1.Motion authorizing the City Manager, the City Attorney, or their designees, to enter into and execute a Legal Services Agreement (LSA) with Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP (Norton) for a three-year term to provide Glendale Water & Power Department (GWP) bond counsel and disclosure counsel services, including the upcoming refunding of the 2026 Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, for a not-to-exceed amount of $250,000
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: Kassakhian

Absent: None
Abstain: None
21 of 383

8 03 10 26 CC

2.Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Public Financial Management Financial Advisors, LLC (PFM) for a three-year term to perform financial advisory services related to Glendale Water & Power Department (GWP), including the issuance of the 2026 Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds for a not-to-exceed amount of $100,000 Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: Kassakhian

Absent: None
Abstain: None
e.Glendale Water and Power, re: Direction to Issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Scott Mellon, General Manager, Glendale Water and Power Presentation:

Ruzan Soloyan, Clean Energy Officer, Glendale Water and Power Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks

1.Motion directing the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power, or his designee, to prepare and issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) for third-party vendors to design, install, operate, and maintain curbside EV chargers in predefined locations in the public right-of-way, based on staff’s evaluation of deployment models, ensuring that the RFP includes utility oversight of load management, data access, pricing principles, and compliance with right-of-way requirements and standards to ensure affordability, transparency, equity, and consistency with City and utility operational standards
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
22 of 383

9 03 10 26 CC

11.HEARINGS

12.REPORTS - INFORMATION

13.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

Beth Brooks
Councilmember Asatryan stepped out at 10:00 PM and returned at 10:01 PM.

15.NEW BUSINESS

16.ADJOURNMENT – 10:06 PM
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Najarian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
23 of 383

1 03 24 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MARCH 24, 2026

ROLL CALL

1.DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

2.CLOSED SESSION – No Scheduled Closed Session

3.REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:00 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a.Flag Salute: Mayor Najarian
b.Invocation: Delivered by Rev. Dr. Angela Galanis Price, First United Methodist Church
c.Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on March 19, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4.PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS

6.CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Gharpetian reported on legislative advocacy meetings in Sacramento on March 17–18, 2026, where he and staff met with various state elected officials and government offices regarding numerous issues affecting Glendale. He also noted that he received several calls regarding the Verdugo Road meetings and expressed hope that future meetings would be scheduled after 6:00 PM.

Councilmember Kassakhian attended several events with fellow councilmembers this past week. He noted that he represented the City at a concert at the Alex Theatre for the Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Society, where the Sayat Nova Choir delivered an outstanding performance. He was also in Sacramento and attended one of the City’s legislative advocacy days, as well as meetings with the Metropolitan Water District.
24 of 383

2 03 24 26 CC
Councilmember Asatryan shared remarks on Women’s History Month, the bravery of Dolores Huerta, and the ongoing struggle to combat sexual violence against women. She thanked staff for acting swiftly to cancel the Cesar Chavez event and expressed hope for future local celebrations honoring farmworkers and labor movements. She also noted that the Armenian Kids Festival will take place on March 29, 2026, from 12:00 PM to 5:00 PM at Verdugo Park.

Councilmember Brotman noted that he had received many inquiries regarding the proposed car wash at the site of the former Acapulco Restaurant in Glendale.

He stated that while the decision rests with the private property owner, a car wash is a permitted land use at that location. He also attended the Regional Mayors and Councilmembers Immigration Field Hearing, organized by Los Angeles Mayor Bass, which provided an opportunity to share immigration enforcement stories from across Los Angeles County, including that of late Glendale resident Julio Peña.

Mayor Najarian shared several upcoming events. The City of Glendale’s Housing Summit will take place on March 25, 2026, from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM at the Adult Recreation Center. The City is also updating its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, and the community is encouraged to help guide the process by taking the survey at GlendaleCA.gov/LHMP. The annual Spring Eggstravaganza will take place on March 28, 2026, from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM at Pacific Park Community Center.

Mayor Najarian asked that the meeting be adjourned in memory of former Glendale Fire Chief Richard Hinz, who served the residents of Glendale from 1964 to 2001. He also recognized two young individuals participating in the U.S.

Department of State Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative Professional Fellows Program: Fretzie Basal of the Philippines and Chhyfa Mao of Cambodia.

He requested that next week’s Council Meeting agenda include, as a new business item, the lease of the Footprints of Comfort Women statue back to the Korean community.

Councilmember Asatryan also announced that the Americana at Brand will host a family-friendly event on March 28, 2026, from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM.

7.COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

Stepan Partamian
Davit Mnatsakanyan
25 of 383

3 03 24 26 CC

8.FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Tony Passarella
Susan Wolfson
Les Hammer
Herbert Molano
Mike Mohill
Sarah Grigorian
Jackie Gish
Mike Borisov
Judy Lan
Mike Khodbyan
Vivian Khanchian
Fernando Roldan
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:08 PM and returned at 7:14 PM.

9.ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.Community Services and Parks, re: Amendment No. 1 to the Standard Lease between the City of Glendale and Babak B. Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue to extend the Lease for an 18-month period from April 1, 2026 to September 30, 2027
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Onnig Bulanikian, Director, Community Services and Parks Department

1.Adoption of Ordinance [6049] authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute Amendment No. 1 to the Standard Lease, Contract No. 8002055, between the City of Glendale and Babak B. Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 to extend the Lease for an 18-month period from April 1, 2026 to September 30, 2027 26 of 383

4 03 24 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

10.ACTION ITEMS
a.Public Works, re: Award of a Service Agreement for Tree Maintenance Services to West Coast Arborists, Inc.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Presentation:

Daniel Hardgrove, Assistant Director, Public Works Department Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Jackie Gish

1.Resolution [26-26] awarding a six-year agreement for tree maintenance services to West Coast Arborists, Inc., selected through a best value RFP process based on qualifications and lowest cost; dispensing with lowest competitive bid process, in the amount not to exceed nineteen million, two hundred and fifty thousand, four hundred dollars ($19,250,400)
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Kassakhian stepped out at 7:31 PM and returned at 7:32 PM.
27 of 383

5 03 24 26 CC
b.Public Works, re: Bulky and Abandoned Item Collection Services, Quality Assurance and Digital Service Request System Review
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presentation:

Daniel Hardgrove, Assistant Director, Public Works Department Public Speakers:

Herbert Molano

1.Motion to note and file this report and provide staff direction on expanded Bulky and Abandoned Item Collection Services
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:22 PM and returned at 9:25 PM. c.Management Services, re: Chess Tournament Sponsorship Request Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Domenica Megerdichian, Assistant to the City Manager
Presentation:

Armen Arbartsoumian, American Chess Academy
Public Speakers:

Herbert Molano

1.Motion approving a $18,000 sponsorship for the California State Open Chess Tournament and authorize the City Manager to execute any necessary agreements with the event organizers

2.Resolution [26-27] of Appropriation to appropriate $18,000 for a sponsorship for the California State Open Chess Tournament 28 of 383

6 03 24 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: Kassakhian (recused)
Abstain: None
Councilmember Kassakhian recused himself from this item. He stepped away from the meeting at 9:33 PM and returned at 9:47 PM. d.Management Services, re: Voting Delegate for the 2026 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
General Assembly
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Mike Borisov

1.Motion Designating a Voting Delegate and Alternate
Representative(s) for the 2026 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly
Voting Delegate: Councilmember Kassakhian
Alternate Representative: City Manager Roubik Golanian
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
e.City Attorney, re: Charter Review - Update and Direction on Potential Charter Amendments Pertaining to Council Districts, Directly Elected Mayor, Council Compensation, Civil Service System, Elected vs. Appointed City Clerk and City Treasurer, and Miscellaneous Matters
29 of 383

7 03 24 26 CC
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer
Presentation:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Public Speakers:

Mike Borisov
Beth Brooks
Herbert Molano
Kate Unger
Elyse Kalfayan

1.Motion to Note and File, and Provide Direction to Staff With no objection, Mayor Najarian stated that the Note and File was accepted by acclamation.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 8:52 PM and returned during the presentation.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:20 PM and returned at 9:23 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 10:01 PM and returned at 10:07 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 10:07 and returned at 10:09 PM.

11.HEARINGS

12.REPORTS - INFORMATION

13.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

Beth Brooks
Karineh Simonyan
Davit Mnatsakanyan
Jay
Damian Sullivan

15.NEW BUSINESS
30 of 383

8 03 24 26 CC

16.ADJOURNMENT in the memory of Richard Hinz –10:42 PM
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Najarian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
31 of 383

1 03 31 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MARCH 31, 2026
ROLL CALL – All Present

1.DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS – 4:33 PM
a.Request from Mayor Ara Najarian to Agendize a Discussion on Land Leases for Existing Cultural Statues on City Property Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.CLOSED SESSION – 4:34 PM
a.Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Grigoryan v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 23GDCV02248
b.Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Baca v. City of Glendale,
L.A.S.C. Case No. 25PSCV00598
c.Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation: Initiation of Litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case
City Attorney Michael Garcia stated Council anticipated reporting out on items 2a and 2b. Council recessed to Closed Session at 4:35 PM.

3.REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:06 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a.Flag Salute: Mayor Ara Najarian
b.Invocation: Delivered by Rabbi Rick Schechter, Temple Sinai of Glendale c.Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 31, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on March 26, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall. 32 of 383

2 03 31 26 CC

4.PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.Mayor’s Medal of Honors
Awarded in the categories of Outstanding Economic Advancement and Distinguished Humanitarian Service to David Ho, Pacific BMW b.Pasadena Humane Presentation: Wildlife Safety
Presentation by Kevin McManus, Pasadena Humane

Items 5a and 5b were pulled from the consent calendar for separate consideration.
a.Public Works, re: Adopt Plans and Specifications for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair (ADA) Project and the District 12 Pavement Management Program Implementation (PMP) Project
Public Speakers:

Fernando Roldan

1.Resolution [26-28] adopting the plans and specifications for the District 12 ADA Project, Specification No. 4039, and the District 12 PMP Project, Specification No. 3965, and Plan Nos. 1-3119, 2-419, 49-269; and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.Resolution [26-29] authorizing the establishment and recordation of public street easements over certain privately owned parcels historically used as public streets and sidewalks, and suspending any City- imposed fees for said documentation and recording in connection with current and future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects 33 of 383

3 03 31 26 CC
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b.Public Works, re: Award Construction Contract for West Glendale ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Project Phase II Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Fernando Roldan
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Sarkis Oganesyan, Assistant Director/City Engineer, Public Works Department

1.Motion awarding a construction contract to CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. in the amount of $3,444,149, approving a 20 percent construction reserve in the amount of $688,830, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the contract
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.Resolution of appropriation [26-30] to appropriate funds in the amount of $4,305,186 for the West Glendale ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program Phase 2
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
34 of 383

4 03 31 26 CC
c.Public Works, re: Authorizing a Five-Year General Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles

1.Motion to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute a General Services Agreement (GSA) with the County of Los Angeles for the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2031, to allow the City to utilize County services on an as-needed and as- requested basis, and to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute any sub-agreements for specific services under the GSA Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
d.Police Department, re: To accept additional grant funding from the United States Department of Homeland Security FY 2023 Urban Area Security Initiatives (UASI) Grant Program

1.Motion to accept additional grant funds in the amount of $280,000 and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to execute an amendment to the Sub-Recipient agreement with the City of Los Angeles for the award of funds under the FY 2023 UASI grant program
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.Resolution of Appropriation [26-31] to appropriate $280,000 from the Urban Area Security Initiatives (UASI) Grant Program grant revenue
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
35 of 383

5 03 31 26 CC
e.Public Works, re: Plans and Specification for the 2026 Sewer Lining Project and On-Call Sewer and Storm Drain Lining Services

1.Resolution [26-32] adopting the plans and specification for the 2026 Sewer Lining Project and On-Call Sewer and Storm Drain Lining Services, Specification No. 3976 and Plan Nos. 3-1590 and 3-1595; and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
f.City Attorney, re: Amendment to the City’s existing Legal Services Agreement with Best Best & Krieger, LLP (BBK) and request for conflict-of-interest Waiver in Legal Representation by BBK

1.Motion authorizing the City Manager, the City Attorney, or their designees, to enter into and execute an amendment to the existing Legal Services Agreement with BBK, Contract No. 8001628, in the amount of $50,000, for a new not to exceed amount of $200,000, in order for BBK to provide legal services related to the Grayson Repowering Project’s permit variance application before the South Coast Air Quality Management District
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.Motion authorizing the City Attorney to consent to and execute a Conflict-of-Interest Waiver for BBK’s representation of the South Coast Air Quality Management District in unrelated matters
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
36 of 383

6 03 31 26 CC

6.CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Brotman shared comments regarding improving Fire Department communication on brush clearance, noting that messaging in a recent mailer about brush clearance inspections may have been confusing.

Councilmember Asatryan attended the First Robotics Competition held at Glendale High School and the YWCA Centennial Celebration. She discussed ways the Commission on the Status of Women and Glendale Community College could partner on future events and research initiatives. She also praised the recent women in film panel hosted by the Armenian Film Society as well as the recent Zatik Kids Festival and Eggstravaganza.

Councilmember Kassakhian requested that tonight’s Council meeting be adjourned in memory of Charles Beatty, a resident and business owner who had a significant impact on Crescenta Valley.

Councilmember Gharpetian also attended the YWCA Centennial reception. He attended the City Council Candidate Forum organized by the Northwest Glendale Homeowners Association, as well as the Eggstravaganza. He questioned the use of City property for campaign purposes, citing the No Kings Rally in Parcher Plaza as an example. He also asked why the La Crescenta Avenue Project has not yet been completed.

City Manager Golanian shared that the La Crescenta Avenue Project had been anticipated to be completed by December 2025; however, the expansion of the Twelve Oaks senior housing facility includes the undergrounding of power and communication cables. As a result, the street paving portion of the project has been delayed until that undergrounding is complete.

Councilmember Gharpetian also discussed providing clarification regarding Councilmember use of the professional headshots the City takes of elected officials.

Mayor Najarian shared several upcoming events, including the Earth Day Fair on April 4, 2026, from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM at Verdugo Park; the Autism Awareness Resource Fair on April 11, 2026, from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM at Pacific Park; and the 11th Annual Montrose Craft Beer Festival on April 12, 2026, from 12:00 PM to 4:00 PM. He also congratulated the Glendale Police Department for earning first place in the 300 category in the Baker to Vegas Relay Race. 37 of 383

7 03 31 26 CC

7.COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

Beth Brooks
Priscilla Javaherian
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:09 PM and returned at 7:13 PM.

8.FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Mike Mohill
Les Hammer
Tony Passarella
Patrick Murphy
Susan Wolfson
Artak Harutyunyun
Vivian Khanchian
Arin GH
Staff Comments:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:17 PM and returned at 7:25 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 7:40 PM and returned at 7:42 PM.

9.ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.Glendale Water and Power, re: Glendale Water and Power (GWP) Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds 2026 - Adoption of Ordinance and Authorizing Issuance of Bonds and Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Invitation of Bids and Various Actions Relating to the Issuance of the Bonds (Brotman, 3/10/2026)
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
38 of 383

8 03 31 26 CC

1.Ordinance [6050] authorizing the issuance by the City of not to exceed $45,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of City of Glendale Electric Revenue Bonds, 2026 Refunding Series, Payable out of the Electric Works Revenue Fund, and approving certain other actions in connection therewith
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: Kassakhian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.Resolution [26-33] authorizing the invitation of bids for the purchase of Electric Revenue Bonds, 2026 Refunding Series of the City of Glendale; approving a Notice of Intention to Sell bonds, a Preliminary Official Statement (POS), a Notice Inviting Bids and Official Bid Form; authorizing the publication of a Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds; authorizing the execution and delivery of a final Official Statement, a Twelfth Supplement to Indenture of Trust, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, and an Escrow Agreement; and authorizing the award of the Bonds
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: Kassakhian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

10.ACTION ITEMS
a.Public Works, re: Construction Contract Amendment for the On- Call Sewer and Storm Drain Repair Services
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager

1.Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute a contract amendment to Contract No. 8002780 with W. A. Rasic Construction Company, Inc. increasing the contract amount by $2,000,000 for the remaining two years of the contract term, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $3,200,000
39 of 383

9 03 31 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.Resolution of appropriation [26-34] to appropriate funds in the amount of $1,750,000 for the On-Call Sewer and Storm Drain Repair Services Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b.Glendale Water and Power, re: Water Master Plan Update and Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Arcadis U.S., Inc.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presentation:

Chisom Obegolu, Assistant General Manager – Water, Glendale Water & Power
Public Speakers:

Jackie Gish
Mike B

1.Motion to Note and File Water Master Plan Update
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
40 of 383

10 03 31 26 CC

2.Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute an amendment to the existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Contract No. 8002793, with Arcadis U.S., Inc. (Arcadis), to increase the contract amount by $127,211 in order for Arcadis to provide additional services related to the development of a comprehensive Water Master Plan, for a new contract not-to- exceed amount of $1,324,103
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Mayor Najarian stepped away at 7:52 PM and returned at 7:54 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:55 PM and returned at 8:10 PM.

Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 8:04 PM and returned at 8:05 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 8:06 PM and returned at 8:07 PM. c.Public Works, re: Consideration of Regulations for Personal Delivery Devices (PDDs) Operating Within the Public Right-of- Way
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
1)Motion providing direction regarding one of the following options:
a. Initiate development of a permanent ordinance regulating PDDs b. Direct staff to prepare a limited pilot program prior to adopting permanent regulations; or
c. Note and file this report and defer action pending further regional coordination and monitoring
Motion revised to direct staff to draft a moratorium for future Council consideration.
41 of 383

11 03 31 26 CC
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian
Noes: Asatryan, Najarian

Absent: None
Abstain: None
d.Fire Department, re: Public Provider Ground Emergency Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer (PP-GEMT-IGT) Program Appropriation Adjustment Request
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks

1.Resolution of appropriation [26-35] to approve an increased to cover the City’s required Inter-Governmental Transfer (IGT) payments associated with the PP-GEMT-IGT Program
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: Brotman
Abstain: None
Councilmember Brotman left the meeting at 9:15 PM.

11.HEARINGS

12.REPORTS - INFORMATION

13.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
42 of 383

12 03 31 26 CC

Beth Brooks
Areni
Alex Balekian
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:22 PM and returned at 9:24 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:27 PM and returned at 9:29 PM.

15.NEW BUSINESS
a.Councilmember Kassakhian moved that the City Attorney is authorized to resolve the lawsuit entitled Mane Grigoryan v. City of Glendale et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Number 23GDCV02248, in exchange for a full release of all claims in the amount of $49,999.99.

Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: Brotman
Abstain: None
b.Councilmember Asatryan moved that the City Attorney is authorized to resolve the lawsuit entitled James Baca v. City of Glendale, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Number 25PSCV00598, in exchange for a full release of all claims in the amount of $18,500.00.

Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: Brotman
Abstain: None
43 of 383

13 03 31 26 CC

16.ADJOURNMENT in the memory of Charles Beatty – 9:33 PM Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Gharpetian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
44 of 383

1 04 14 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
APRIL 14, 2026
ROLL CALL – All Present

1.DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS – 3:39 PM
a. Councilmember Kassakhian’s Request for a Report on an Ordinance Establishing Staffing Requirements for Self-Checkout Stations at Grocery Stores
Public Speaker:

Tim James
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian
Noes: Najarian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2.CLOSED SESSION – 3:49 PM
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, and Domenica Megerdichian. Property Location:
250 N. Orange Street. Negotiating Parties: Center for Armenian Arts.

Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of lease of City property
b. Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Onnig Bulanikian and Domenica Megerdichian.

Property Location: Land located near the front entrance to the Adult Recreation Center at 201 E. Colorado St. Negotiating Parties: Filipino Business Association of Glendale – Greater Los Angeles County and Comfort Women Action for Redress and Education. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of lease of City property containing the Filipino American Friendship Monument and the Glendale Peace Monument
45 of 383

2 04 14 26 CC
City Attorney Michael Garcia stated the Council did not anticipate reporting out on these items. Council recessed to Closed Session at 3:49 PM.

3.REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:07 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Ara Najarian
b. Invocation: Delivered by Sandonne Goad, Tribal Council Chairwoman for the Gabrielino/Tongva Nation
Invocation delivered by Ed White, Tribal Council Vice-Chairman Ancestor Song delivered by Joseph Dominguez, Tribal Council Secretary Remarks delivered by Sandonne Goad, Tribal Council Chairwoman c. Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 14, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on April 9, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4.PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Mayor’s Medal of Honor
Accepted by Rick Caruso, Founder and Executive Chairman of Caruso b. Mayor’s Commendation: Glendale AYSO Region 88 U10 Girls Soccer Team – 2026 Western States Champions
Accepted by Aldo Mascheroni, Region Commissioner
Present were Angel Onate, Head Coach; Emily Vincent, Assistant Coach; Harry Hannessian, PR Coordinator; and the Players: Alexandra Bautista, Rachel Fagundo, Thelma Hall, Hannah Hirdler, Hazel Mueth, Elise Ostray, Celia Ramirez-Sburlan, Olivia Salazar, Chloe Tse, and Ellie Vincent c. Proclamation Designating April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month & April 29th, 2026, as Denim Day
Accepted by Dalia Lomeli, Board Member, YWCA Glendale & Pasadena d. Proclamation Designating April 15, 2026, as Arbor Day Accepted by Daniel Hardgrove, Assistant Director, Public Works Department Public Speaker:

Allen Dish
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:06 PM and returned at 7:14 PM. e. Proclamation Designating April 22, 2026, as Earth Day Accepted by George Balteria, President and Inder Risam, Vice President, Glendale Parks & Open Spaces Foundation
46 of 383

3 04 14 26 CC
f. Outgoing Mayor’s comments
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Allen Dish
Allan Durham
Mike Mohill
Alex Avanesyan for State Assemblymember Nick Schultz
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
g. Selection of a New Mayor
Nominations:

Mayor Najarian formally nominated Councilmember Kassakhian.

Staff Comments:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Public Comments:

Allan Durham
Mike Mohill
John Arangio
Beth Brooks
Allen Dish
Davit Mnatsakanyan
Roll Call:

Asatryan: Kassakhian
Brotman: Kassakhian
Gharpetian: Abstain
Kassakhian: Kassakhian
Najarian: Kassakhian
City Clerk Dr. Suzie Abajian declared Councilmember Kassakhian as the duly elected Mayor of the City of Glendale.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:51 PM and returned at 8:01 PM. 47 of 383

4 04 14 26 CC

5.CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are routine and may be acted upon by one motion. Any Member of Council or the audience requesting separate consideration may do so by making such request before motion is proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the City Council Meeting of February 24, 2026, and the Special City Council Meeting of March 3, 2026 b. Community Services and Parks, re: Appropriation of $357,000 Community Cleanup and Employment Pathway (CCEP) Grant Funds from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the Community Beautification and Youth Employment Initiative

1.Motion accepting Community Cleanup and Employment Pathway (CCEP) Grant funds in the amount of $357,000 from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the Community Beautification and Youth Employment Initiative; and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funds

2.Resolution [26-36] of Appropriation to appropriate $357,000 in CCEP grant funds from the California Department of Transportation for the Community Beautification and Youth Employment Initiative c. City Manager, re: Appointment of Interim Director of Community Development

1.Resolution [26-37] Appointing Jack L. Wong as Interim Director of Community Development Pursuant to Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21221(h) and Approving Employment Agreement Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

6.CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Asatryan highlighted the recent Autism Resource Fair and the 2nd Annual Women’s Fire Academy, which was held this year in collaboration with the Glendale, Pasadena, and Burbank fire departments. 48 of 383

5 04 14 26 CC
Mayor Najarian noted an upcoming Arbor Day celebration on April 15, 2026, at 10:00 AM at Parcher Plaza. He also announced that on April 18, 2026, Grandview Library will host a clothing swap from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and a repair café from 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM.

City Clerk Dr. Abajian reminded residents that the last day to register to vote before the June 2, 2026 election is May 18, 2026. She noted that anyone who misses that deadline may still cast a provisional ballot at a Vote Center, which will be open from May 23 through June 2, 2026. Information regarding 11-day Vote Centers and 4-day Vote Centers will be available at glendalevotes.org.

Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 8:18 PM and returned at 8:21 PM.

7.COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

Allen Dish

8.FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

John Madden
Les Hammer
Susan Wolfson
Patrick Masihi
Bunny Rutherford
Mike Mohill
Tony Passarella
Lisa Morris
Ani Kash
Richard Cronin
Allan Durham
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Dr. Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
49 of 383

6 04 14 26 CC
Mayor Najarian stepped away at 8:20 PM and returned at 8:27 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 8:27 PM and returned at 8:33 PM.

9.ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

10.ACTION ITEMS
a. Fire Department, re: Purchase of personal protective equipment – turnout gear for the Glendale Fire Department.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Jeff Brooks, Chief, Glendale Fire Department

1. Resolution [26-38] authorizing a change in vendor for standardized Fire- Dex products, dispensing with competitive bidding, and authorizing the procurement of Fire-Dex products and related services from Great West Fire & Safety, Inc.

Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b. City Attorney, re: Charter Review - Update and Direction on Potential Charter Amendments Pertaining to Council-Manager Governance, Council Compensation, Civil Service System, Elected vs. Appointed City Clerk and City Treasurer, and Miscellaneous Matters Staff Comments:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Mike Borisov
Elise Kalfayan

1.Motion to Note and File, and Provide Direction to Staff Direction was provided to City Attorney, Michael Garcia. 50 of 383

7 04 14 26 CC
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:08 PM and returned at 9:16 PM.

Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away after 9:21 PM and returned at 9:41 PM.

Councilmember Kassakhian stepped away at 9:41 PM and returned at 9:44 PM.

Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away after 9:43 PM and returned at 9:45 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 9:49 PM and returned at 9:52 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 9:52 PM and returned at 9:57 PM.

11.HEARINGS
a. Fire Department, re: Public Hearing for the 2026 Annual Weed Abatement Program
Mayor Najarian opened the hearing at 10:12 PM and closed it at 10:13 PM.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager

1.Motion to approve Abatement order directing the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner/Director of Weights and Measures to abate the nuisance on each declared parcel
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

12.REPORTS - INFORMATION
a. City Attorney, re Presentation on Rules Regarding Use of Government Resources for Campaign Purposes and
Electioneering/Campaigning During Public Comment Portions of City Council Meetings
Staff Comments:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Presentation:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
51 of 383

8 04 14 26 CC
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Davit Mnatsakanyan

13.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

Beth Brooks
Davit Mnatsakanyan
Anonymous

15.NEW BUSINESS

16.ADJOURNMENT – 11:04 PM
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
52 of 383

5b
26-89806

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List for Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017
1)Resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List, the Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 28, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For the City of Glendale to be eligible for Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 program funds, and per the Streets and Highways Code Section 2034, the city must adopt a list of projects funded by SB1 via a resolution and submit the adopted list to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on or before July 1, 2026.

The intent of this item is for the City Council to approve the Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List as outlined in this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List that consists of the Maintenance District 12 Pavement Management Program (PMP) Implementation Project.

ANALYSIS
The city currently receives transportation funding from the State of California typically in the form of grants, or direct allocation of the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax (Gas Tax), through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA). HUTA funds are used primarily for pavement rehabilitation.

SB1 created a new funding opportunity known as the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). The bill directs the RMRA funds to be split 50/50 between the state and cities/counties to address the backlog of maintenance on state and local roadway systems as well as the improvement of California’s trade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities.
53 of 383

5b2
26-89806
6 7
3 2
On November 1, 2017, SB1 increased several fuel and vehicle license fees in California, including the gasoline excise tax by 12 cents per gallon and the diesel excise tax by 20 cents per gallon. A separate price-based gasoline excise tax was reset to 17.3 cents per gallon, while the state sales tax on diesel for transportation funding increased from 1.75% to 5.75%. An additional vehicle registration fee ranging from $25 to $175 is levied annually based on the value of the vehicle, and a $100 transportation fee is levied on zero-emissions vehicles beginning in 2020. Furthermore, starting 2020, these taxes and fees began increasing with the California Consumer Price Index.

Eligible Uses
Funds made available by the RMRA Program can be used to satisfy State or Federal grant matching requirements, or in furthering projects that include, but are not limited to:
Road maintenance and rehabilitation;
Safety projects;
Railroad grade separations;
Active transportation purposes in conjunction with any other allowable project; and
Traffic control devices.

In March 2021, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) released updated 2021 RMRA annual reporting guidelines. Per Streets and Highways Code Section 2034, cities must adopt their SB1 project lists via resolution, and not through the adopted citywide budget.

The cities’ “maintenance of effort” (MOE) spending, i.e., use of General Funds for streets and roads, must be at or above the average level for fiscal years 2009-10, 2010- 11, and 2011-12. To receive an allocation or apportionment, the city shall annually expend from its General Fund for street, road, and highway purposes an amount not less than this average. The City of Glendale’s average MOE for these three years is $8,563,286, which primarily includes General Fund spending on street and roadway maintenance activities, traffic operations, and directly related staff and operational efforts. While the city does not typically fund capital projects with the General Fund, eligible roadway capital improvements, such as rehabilitation, reconstruction, complete streets, or PMP projects, would also count toward MOE if funded.

The California Department of Transportation Audit Office will have jurisdiction to ensure cities are operating efficiently, effectively, economically, and in compliance with all applicable federal and state requirements.

Effective Dates of RMRA Revenue Mechanisms:

Revenue Mechanisms Effective Date First Inflation
Adjustment
12 cent/gallon increase to the Excise Tax November 1, 2017 July 20, 2020 20 cent/gallon increase to the Diesel Tax November 1, 2017 July 20, 2020 54 of 383

5b3
26-89806
6 7
3 2
4 cent/gallon increase to Diesel Sales Tax November 1, 2017 N/A Transportation improvement fee collected with
vehicle registration fee based on the market
value of vehicle.
$25 for vehicles less than $5,000 in value;
$50 for $5,000-$24,999;
$100 for $25,000-$34,999;
$150 for $35,000-59,999; and
$175 for vehicles $60,000 or more in value.

Spring 2018 July 1, 2020
$100 Vehicle Registration Fee for all zero-
emission vehicles model year 2020 and later. July 1, 2020 January 1, 2021 The city receives its apportionments of RMRA funds monthly.

As required in the RMRA reporting guidelines, the projects listed below must also be submitted to the CTC.

In Fiscal Year 2026-27, the city will use RMRA funds for the following project:

Maintenance District 12 PMP Implementation Project (new project):
a. Project Title: Maintenance District 12 PMP Implementation Project b. Project Description: Pavement rehabilitation of residential streets within Maintenance District 12 in La Crescenta - Montrose neighborhoods in the City of Glendale.
c. Location: City of Glendale Maintenance District 12, various streets located in La Crescenta - Montrose neighborhoods.
d. Estimated Project Schedule:
Design completion (Construction Documents) March 2026
Advertise projects for bids April 2026
Bid opening June 2026
Award construction contract July 2026
Start construction of project February 2027
Complete construction of project April 2027
e. Estimated Project Useful Life: 15 years minimum and up to 20 years for the street resurfacing.

This report request for approval to allocate SB1 funds from the FY 2026-27 revenue toward the construction of the Maintenance District 12 PMP Implementation Project will address several key community priorities such as pavement rehabilitation and roadway resurfacing.
55 of 383

5b4
26-89806
6 7
3 2

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
City of Glendale residents and businesses impacted by Public Works projects are contacted and notified throughout the various stages of the project. At the beginning stages of the project, staff develop the project dedicated website and host them on the city website. Project specific webpages provide detailed project information as well as the relevant project contacts for additional information requests. The webpages are updated monthly and as necessary as the project moves through the various project phases.

Additionally, as part of our public outreach efforts, community meetings are scheduled to share and discuss project details with property owners, businesses, and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project vicinity and along the project corridor, as applicable. During the meetings, the participants are informed of the project details, construction schedule, future city and contractor notifications, and the impacts of the construction work on their neighborhood. Participants can ask questions and provide comments to staff. After the community meeting, staff reviews and incorporates public comments as practical in the final design.

After successful advertise and award of a project to a responsive and responsible bidder by the city, a Director’s Letter is sent by the Director of Public Works to the impacted addresses notifying them of the upcoming project and timeline. Finally, two separate construction notifications are distributed by the general contractor contracted for the project to the immediate project locations impacted during the various phases of construction; one at two weeks and another three days prior to the commencement of the work. Finally, electronic changeable message boards and projects signs are deployed strategically throughout the project to further inform the public about construction impacts such as planned closures and expected delays, as well as detailed construction phase schedules.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable for this report

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not approve the resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 SB1 Project List. Staff will look for other funding sources for constructing the project on the SB1 Project List.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
56 of 383

5b5
26-89806
6 7
3 2
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Rustom Tavitian, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 - Maintenance District 12 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project Location Map
57 of 383

RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City of Glendale must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale, will receive an estimated $5,496,609 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the nineth year in which the City of Glendale is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and WHEREAS, the City of Glendale used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high- priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets, roads, bridges, and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and multiple similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City of Glendale’s streets and roads are in an “good” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system 58 of 383

and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “excellent” condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Glendale, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following list of proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with fiscal year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: Maintenance District 12 Pavement
Management Program Implementation
Project
Project Description: Pavement rehabilitation of residential streets within Maintenance District 12 in La
Crescenta - Montrose neighborhoods in the
City of Glendale.

Project Location: City of Glendale Maintenance District 12, various streets located in La Crescenta -
Montrose neighborhoods.

Estimated Useful Project Life: 15-20 Years
Proposed Schedule for Completion: Fiscal Year 2026-27
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Glendale, State of California this _____ day of ____________, 2026.
____________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
____________________________
City Attorney
59 of 383

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _________________, 2026, the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
60 of 383

LOWELL AVE.

I-210 FWY
LOWELL AVE.

GLENCOVE AVE.

BURRITT WY.

SKYVIEW LN.

BRITTANY LN.

DAY ST.

ACAMPO AVE.

VERWOOD AVE.

REYNARD AVE.

MARKRIDGE RD.

EL CAMINO ST.

LOS AMIGOS ST.

EL MORENO ST.

LOS OLIVOS LN.

PONTIAC ST.FOOTHILL BLVD.

FOURTH AVE.

ABELLA ST.

COMMUNITY AVE.

FOOTHILL BLVD.

NEW YORK AVE.

PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

NEW YORK AVE.

FRANKLIN ST.GLENCOVE AVE.

SECOND AVE.

FIFTH AVE.

ALTURA AVE.

MARYANN ST.

DANNY DR.REBECCA AVE.

EL CAMINITO ST.

FREDERICK AVE.

FINEHILL AVE.

HENRITETTA AVE.

DUNSMORE AVE.DUNSMORE AVE.

LAUDERDALE AVE.

FAIRESTA ST.

WILLALEE
AVE.

ALLEY 10
THELMA ST.

ALLEY 138
BOSTON AVE. BOSTON AVE.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF LOS ANGELESCITY OF GLENDALE
SKY RIDGE RD.

N
LEGEND

PROJECT LOCATION

CITY LIMITS

EXHIBIT 1- PROJECT LOCATION MAP
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 12 PAVEMENT

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT
61 of 383

FORESTGLEN
DR.

BEECHGLEN
DR.

BOSTON AVE.

FERNTREE
PL.

TANBARK
PL. HONOLULU AVE.

ENCINAL AVE.

HONOLULU AVE.

PARKVISTA DR.

PARKVISTA PL.

NEW YORK AVE.

PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

I-210 FWY
I-210 FWY
LA CRESCENTA AVE.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF LOS ANGELES
MONTROSE AVE.

MANHATTAN AVE.HERMOSA AVE.

CLOUD AVE.

GLENWOOD
AVE.

CAMANNAVE.

SHIRLYJEAN
AVE.

EMANUEL DR.EILINITA AVE.

DOLORITA AVE.

LIBERTY AVE.

MILLS
AVE.

PIEDMONT AVE.

ALLEY 132
DUNSMORE AVE.

FREDERICK
AVE.

CEDARBEND DR.

EL LADO DR
.

PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

N
LEGEND

PROJECT LOCATION

CITY LIMITS

EXHIBIT 1- PROJECT LOCATION MAP
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 12 PAVEMENT

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT
62 of 383

5c
26-89978

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) Amendment No. 2 from Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department for revised FY 2025-26 Modernizing Older Californians Act (MOCA) funding allocation.

2. Resolution of Appropriation to reprogram $31,800 of MOCA Congregate Meals Program C1 to ENP MOCA C2 Home Delivered Meals Program.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 28, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community Services & Parks (CSP) Department is requesting that the City Council approve Amendment No. 2 to the four-year subaward from Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department (AD) for the Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) to authorize the transfer of Modernizing Older Californians Act (MOCA) funding from Congregate Meals Services to Home Delivered Meals Services in order to utilize these resources for the remainder of Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 to serve additional home-delivered meals.

During last year’s budget process, the City accepted and executed FY 2025-26 subaward with LA County AD, which included $31,800 in MOCA funding allocated to ENP C1 Congregate Meals Program to provide in-person meals to seniors.

The C1 program will not be able to fully expend the funds to meet the June 30, 2026, deadline and the C2 Home Delivered Meals Program is overserving and needs more funds to provide additional meals to homebound seniors. Therefore, LA County AD has revised the MOCA funding allocation to transfer the $31,800 originally awarded to ENP C1 Congregate Meals Program to ENP C2 Home Delivered Meals Program to serve up to 6,695 additional home delivered meals which will allow the City to maintain current service demands and avoid placing eligible seniors on a waitlist. 63 of 383

5c2
26-89978
6 8
0 1

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Subaward ENP252604, period July 2025 – June 2026, to transfer and reprogram $31,800 in Los Angeles County AD for FY 2025-26 MOCA funding from ENP C1 to ENP C2 Program.

ANALYSIS
CSP has been providing meal service to adults 60 years of age and older in the greater Glendale area since 1979 with grant funding administered from Los Angeles County AD through the federal Older Americans Act. The ENP provides an important opportunity for social contact and is the only meal many seniors receive in a day.

The ENP is operated through the Senior Services Section, which provides comprehensive, long-term services that include Congregate Meals (C1), Home Delivered Meals (C2), Emergency Meals, Telephone Reassurance and Supportive Services. The goal of these services is to assist the seniors in our community in maintaining their independence and living in their own homes.

The City’s ENP C1 Program operates two congregate meal sites serving lunch seven days per week at the Adult Recreation Center and five days per week at Sparr Heights Community Center. An average of 4,400 meals per month are served in the program to more than 500 unduplicated seniors annually.

The ENP C2 Program is for homebound older adults requiring food delivery assistance for physical and/or medical reasons and is substantiated by a doctor’s order before beginning program services. Program services include a weekly delivery of seven frozen meals that include bread, fruit, milk, and dessert. The Emergency Meals Program is part of the Home Delivered Meals Program and provides three days’ worth of shelf-stable meals to clients enrolled in the program per fiscal year. The Telephone Reassurance Program is also a part of the Home Delivered Meals Program and ensures that seniors who are shut-in receive a weekly well-being call.

The City contracts with TRIO Community Meals, LLC, to provide congregate and home- delivered meal catering services for the ENP. The contract period is from December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2026. The cost per meal rate is as follows:
Congregate Meals $4.56 per meal
Home Delivered Meals $4.75 per meal
The City has a purchase order with Revolution Foods to provide Emergency Meals to Home Delivered Meals Program clients for three days’ worth of shelf-stable meals at a unit rate of $6.85 per meal.

The City was awarded ENP baseline funding from LA County AD for FY 2025-26 through a noncompetitive process. The City entered into a subaward agreement for an initial one-year term, commencing July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, with three 64 of 383

5c3
26-89978
6 8
0 1
additional one-year renewal options, for a total term of four years. Baseline ENP funding requires a 12% cash match, and FY 2025-26 represents the first year of the subaward term.

In addition to baseline funding, supplemental funding from the California Department of Aging through MOCA was made available for the same period, July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026.

On October 16, 2025, LA County AD further allocated Nutrition Services Incentive Program (NSIP) funding, along with additional MOCA funding, totaling $88,670 to support Congregate Meals (C1) and Home-Delivered Meals (C2) programs for FY 2025- 2026. Unlike baseline and NSIP funds, which require a 12% cash match, MOCA funds do not require a local match.

On April 9, 2026, LA County AD sent a letter requesting the City to revise the ENP subaward allocation and reprogram $31,800 in previously awarded MOCA funding from the C1 Congregate Meals Program to the C2 Home-Delivered Meals Program. This reallocation will enable the City to provide approximately 6,695 additional home- delivered meals through June 30, 2026.

Demand for the C2 Home-Delivered Meals Program remains exceptionally high. This funding adjustment will help the City maintain current service demands and avoid placing eligible seniors on a waitlist.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The ENP is administered by the Senior Services Section at the Adult Recreation Center, with an additional meal site located at the Sparr Heights Community Center. Program services are promoted quarterly through the CSP Leisure Guide, the CSP newsletter, CSP social media channels, and the City’s website. Outreach is also conducted in collaboration with local community agencies to increase public awareness of available services. The Senior Services Committee convenes quarterly, with meeting notices and agendas posted and distributed to encourage public participation.

FISCAL IMPACT
The MOCA grant award was included as part of the FY 2025–26 budget. Staff is requesting to move the $31,800 from ENP C1 Congregate Meals Program to ENP C2 Home Delivered Meals Program as outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $31,800 43110-2700-CSP-
0020-P0000
CSP01350AG
43110-2700-CSP-
0020-P0000
CSP01377AG
Nutritional Meals
Grant Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Community
Services &
Projects
65 of 383

5c4
26-89978
6 8
0 1
Parks

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) as it creates a government funding mechanism or constitutes other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; thus, it is not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15060(c)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Do not approve transfer and reprogramming of ENP MOCA C1 funding to ENP MOCA C2 program totaling $31,800 from Los Angeles County AD for FY 2025- 2026 ENP; which will result in fewer meals available to homebound seniors.

2. The City Council may consider any alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services & Parks Prepared by:

Aylin Isayan, Community Services Supervisor
Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Tereza Aleksanian, Assistant Director of Community Services & Parks Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
66 of 383

1 1
5 9
7 8
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that, with respect to the April 28, 2026 report of the Director of Community Services & Parks, the Council hereby authorizes the transfer and reprogramming of $31,800 in FY 2025-2026 Modernizing Older Californians Act (MOCA) funding from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department (AD) for provision of the Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP); and authorizes the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department Contract Subaward Number ENP252604, period July 2025 – June 2026, to accept and implement the funding.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
67 of 383

RESOLUTIONNO.

RESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE

MAKINGANAPPROPRIATION
BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE:

SECTION1:Thatthesumof$31800isherebyappropriatedand/ortransferredfromthefollowing accountstothefollowingaccounts:

ACCOUNTSDESCRIPTIONFROMTO
43110-2700-CSP-0020-P0000ContractualServices,NutritionalMealsGrant$31,800 CSPO1350AGFundCommunityServices&Parks,Projects,
ENP-CDAMOCACl2025-2026
43110-2700-CSP-0020-P0000ContractualServices,NutritionalMealsGrant$31,800 CSPO1377AGFundCommunityServices&Parks,Projects,
ENP-CDAMOCAC22025-2026
ToreprogramENPClCongregateMealsProgramtoENPC2HomeDeliveredMealsProgram.

SECTION2:TheDirectorofFinanceisauthorizedtomakesuchotherrevisions,individualappropriation line-items,changesinsummaries,fundtotals,grandtotals,andotherportionsofthebudgetdocumentas necessarytoreflectandimplementthechangesspecifiedinthisresolution.

SECTION3:TheCityClerkshallcertifytotheadoptionofthisResolution.

Adoptedthisdayof
________________,
2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

CITYOFGLENDALE
DATE4/20/2026

APPROVEDASTOFINANCIAL
CityClerkPROVISIONFOR
s31800
STATEOFCALIFORNIA)DirectorofFinance COUNTYOFLOSANGELES)SS

CITYOFGLENDALE)
I,SuzieAbajian,CityClerkoftheCityofGlendale,doherebycertifythattheforegoingResolution No.wasadoptedbytheCounciloftheCityofGlendale,California,ataregularmeetingheldon the__________dayof
________________,
2026,andthatthesamewasadoptedbythefollowingvote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

CityClerk
68 of 383

5d
25-87850

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award Professional Services Agreements (PSA) for On-Call Services for Facilities Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) for the Public Works Department. 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute PSAs for an initial three-year duration from the date of the contract execution, with an option to extend each PSA annually for up to two (2) additional years, and to execute any necessary amendments thereto, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, for an aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $3,600,000 to be shared among the consultant PSAs with the following firms in their respective disciplines:
a. Carrier Johnson + Culture, Struere, Westgroup Designs, Inc., Malekian & Associates, Inc., PracticeLA, Albert Group Architects, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and Infrastructure Architects, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Architectural Services.
b. EPTDESIGN and Albert A. Webb Associates, to provide On-Call Professional Landscape Architectural Services.
c. CWE, Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Civil Engineering Services.
d. John A. Martin & Associates, Inc., DCI Engineers, and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Structural Engineering Services.
e. Budlong & Associates, Inc. and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Electrical, Mechanical, and Plumbing Engineering Services.
f. Citadel CPM, Inc., Cumming Management Group, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Maestro Development, LLC, and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Project Management Services.
g. Maestro Development, LLC, Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, Cumming Management Group, Inc., Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., and CLMI Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Construction Management Services.
69 of 383

5d2
25-87850
6 7
0 2
h. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., and Maestro Development, LLC in partnership with The Anaheim Group (TAG), to provide On-Call Professional Inspection Services.
i. Cumming Management Group, Inc. and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Cost Estimating Services.
j. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Quality Assurance and Quality Control Services.
k. Maestro Development, LLC in partnership with 3QC, and Cumming Management Group, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Commissioning Services.
l. Carrier Johnson + Culture, to provide On-Call Professional Specification Writing Services.
m. Carrier Johnson + Culture, to provide On-Call Professional Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Services.
n. CLMI Group, LLC, Cumming Management Group, Inc., Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Staff Augmentation Services.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for April 28, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PSAs are needed for consultants to provide comprehensive professional services for the Public Works Department (PWD) Facilities CIP program. These consultants will perform various architectural and engineering related work for multiple projects in different stages of development such as preliminary planning, design, project advertisement and award, construction, and post-construction phases.

Following a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process, the consulting firms listed in this report are recommended to be selected. The proposed PSAs with these firms will cost in the aggregate $3,600,000 over the course of the five-years. 70 of 383

5d3
25-87850
6 7
0 2

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the execution of three-year PSAs for on-call services for Facilities CIPs for an aggregate and shared not-to-exceed amount of $3,600,000 with the above listed firms.

ANALYSIS
PWD solicited Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from suitably qualified respondents to provide On-Call Services for Facilities CIP projects. These include the maintenance, construction, and renovation of various general facilities, such as libraries, fire stations, community buildings, parks, playgrounds, lighting and electrical systems, as well as site improvements.

PWD oversees city-wide building maintenance and the execution of capital improvements through the CIP, which includes Local, State, and Federal grants. PWD projects encompass a wide range of initiatives, including, but not limited to, the following:
• New Construction Projects: including the construction of single and multi-story commercial buildings such as community centers, gymnasiums, fire and police stations, libraries, municipal facilities, and more.
• Renovation and Maintenance: Projects for the renovation and upkeep of all city buildings and parks facilities, including playgrounds, sports courts, sports lighting, and other related infrastructure.
• Master Planning: This includes park renovations, the construction of new parks, tenant improvements, and the development of new facilities. • Seismic Retrofitting
• Central Plant Replacements
• Elevator Replacements
To facilitate the design and construction of these and similar projects, the city plans to enter into PSAs with one or more full-service architectural, engineering, and Project Management/Construction Management (PM/CM) firms with subconsultants.

The selected pre-qualified consultants will provide professional support during the procurement, design, and construction phases of the proposed CIP projects.

To secure the most qualified consultants an RFQ was issued on September 22, 2025 for on-call services for:
a) Architectural;
b) Civil Engineering;
c) Landscape Architectural;
d) Structural Engineering;
e) Electrical Engineering;
f) Plumbing and Mechanical Engineering;
71 of 383

5d4
25-87850
6 7
0 2
g) Certified Access Specialist (CASp);
h) Specifications Writing;
i) Cost Estimating;
j) Project Management;
k) Construction Management;
l) Inspections;
m) Quality Assurance and Quality Control;
n) Commissioning;
o) Staff Augmentation;
p) As-built Drawing Services.

To encourage competitive proposals, the city advertised the RFQ on the city’s website and on the following plans holders’ websites:

1. American Institute of Architects - LA

2. Bidnetdirect

3. Construction Bid Source

4. Construct Connect

5. PlanIT Reprographics

6. BidAmerica

7. Bidprime

8. HigherGov

9. BidBanana

10.GovCB
These plan holder’s websites publish RFQs for projects and distribute the information to their extensive network of consultants, contractors, and construction industry contacts.

On November 3, 2025, the city received SOQs from 23 consulting firms, for each discipline under RFQ #PWA 2025-003 as follows:

Architectural

1. Carrier Johnson + Culture

2. Struere

3. Westgroup Designs, Inc.

4. Malekian & Associates, Inc.

5. PracticeLA

6. Albert Group Architects

7. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

8. TR Design Group, Inc.

9. Infrastructure Architects, Inc.

Civil Engineering

1. CWE

2. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

3. Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.
72 of 383

5d5
25-87850
6 7
0 2

4. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Landscape Architectural

1. EPTDESIGN

2. Albert A. Webb Associates
Structural Engineering

1. John A Martin & Associates, Inc.

2. DCI Engineers

3. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Electrical Engineering

1. Budlong & Associates, Inc.

2. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Plumbing and Mechanical Engineering

1. Budlong & Associates, Inc.

2. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Certified Access Specialist (CASp)

1. Carrier Johnson + Culture
Specifications Writing

1. Carrier Johnson + Culture
Cost Estimating

1. Cumming Management Group, Inc.

2. Omnia Consulting Group, LLC
Project Management

1. Citadel CPM, Inc.

2. Cumming Management Group, Inc.

3. Z&K Consultants, Inc.

4. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

5. Maestro Development, LLC

6. Omnia Consulting Group, LLC
Construction Management

1. Maestro Development, LLC.

2. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

3. Z&K Consultants, Inc.

4. Omnia Consulting Group, LLC

5. Cumming Management Group, Inc.

6. Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.

7. CLMI Group
73 of 383

5d6
25-87850
6 7
0 2
Inspections

1. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

2. Z&K Consultants, Inc.

3. Maestro Development, LLC + The Anaheim Group (TAG).

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

1. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Commissioning

1. Maestro Development, LLC + 3QC

2. Cumming Management Group, Inc.

Staff Augmentation

1. CLMI Group, LLC

2. Cumming Management Group, Inc.

3. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

4. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

5. Omnia Consulting Group, LLC

6. Cumming Management Group, Inc.

No proposals were received for As-Built Drawing services.

An evaluation team from the Public Works Department reviewed the SOQs and determined that qualified firms are eligible for inclusion on an established bench of consultants to support the Facilities CIP Section. However, TR Design Group, Inc., who proposed for Architectural Services, was deemed non-responsive.

Currently, the Facilities CIP section is working on multiple approved and newly requested projects in various stages of project development with an estimated construction cost of $13.5M funded by the Transit Prop C Local Fund (2570), Capital Improvement Fund (4010), Refuse Disposal Fund (5300), Electric Depreciation Fund (5830), Building Maintenance Fund (6070), and various State and Federal grant funds including but not limited to the following:

Under Construction:

1. Babe Herman Little League Field Restroom Accessibility Improvements Project

2. Preservation and Reuse of the Former Rockhaven Sanitarium Project

3. Pacific Park/ Edison Artificial Turf Replacement Project

4. Fire Station 23 Kitchen Remodel Project

5. Grandview Roofing and Solar Project

6. Shoseian Tea House Renovation Project

7. Maple Park Community Center Gym Ceiling Replacement Project

8. Design Build of the Fire Systems Improvements at Various City Facilities Project Pre-Construction

9. Glorietta Park Lighting Project
74 of 383

5d7
25-87850
6 7
0 2

10.Central Park Block Project
Design

11.Corporate Yard Renovations Project

12.Renovations at Fire Station #27 Project

13.GWP ITD Office Redesign and Remodel Project

14.Wastewater Shop Space Optimization Project

15.PW Admin and Engineering Renovation Project

16.Grandview Library Tenant Improvement Project

17.Roll-up Door Replacement Project
Planning

18.Emerald Isle Park Perimeter Wall Project

19.Chevy Chase Library Reroof Project

20.Fire Station #21 Generator Replacement Project

21.Doctor’s House Restoration and Preservation Project

22.Fire Stations #26, 28, 29 Programming Assessment Project

23.Verdugo and Brand Park Electrical Upgrade Project

24.GWP Fleet Garage Women’s Restroom Project

25.GTC Upgrades Project

26.EMC Tenant Improvements Project

27.IWM Emergency Generator Project

28.PW UOC Warehouse Roof Replacement Project

29.ITD Data Center Remodel Project

30.Perkins Data Center and UOC Data Center Upgrades Project

31.Verdugo Fire Communications Center

32.Upper Scholl Canyon Demo and Renovation

33.Chevy Chase Library Restrooms
As reflected in the list above, along with other ongoing initiatives and priorities, these professional consulting firms will support the Facilities CIP section staff at various phases of current and upcoming Facilities CIPs, as needs arise.

In addition, establishing on-call agreements with these consultants for the services described will offer the following advantages:
Access to specialized expertise: These firms bring diverse architectural and engineering capabilities, enabling PWD to draw on targeted knowledge and skills that may not be available internally.
Ability to stay focused on core work: On-call architectural and professional engineering support allows PWD to concentrate on its primary responsibilities while delegating specialized technical work to experienced professionals, improving productivity and overall efficiency.
Greater flexibility: Using on-call services helps PWD adjust staffing and workload 75 of 383

5d8
25-87850
6 7
0 2
as project demands change. This approach allows resources to be directed to the work PWD does best and that delivers the most value, supporting stronger productivity and efficiency.
Objective perspective: Independent architecture and engineering consultants can provide an unbiased viewpoint, which can be valuable when evaluating options and making well-informed project decisions.

The PSAs for these services will be in effect for three years from the date of contract certification by the City Manager, with an option to extend each PSA annually for up to two (2) additional years.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Outreach on every project assigned to these consultants will occur through a dedicated website for each project individually, and as necessary through public outreach and community events. The website page will introduce the public to the project and to the project team, explain the scope of work and project locations, highlight the current and overall project phases, and provide the public with Staff contact information for questions, discussion and/or input.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total aggregate budget for all PSAs for On-Call Architectural and Engineering PSAs is $3,600,000 for the initial three-year contract duration and with an option to extend annually for up to two years. Funding in the amount of $1,305,000 will be allocated from various funding sources and projects to cover the remainder of FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27. Funding for each fiscal year beginning FY 2027-28 will be requested as part of the city’s annual budget process. The existing appropriation is outlined as follows:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$60,000 GL: 43110-4010-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01477BN
Capital Improvement Fund
$75,000 GL: 43110-4010-CSP-0020-P0000
PL: CSP01265AN
Capital Improvement Fund
$116,250 GL: 43110-4010-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01449AN
Capital Improvement Fund
$30,000 GL: 43110-4010-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01476BN
Capital Improvement Fund
$60,000 GL: 43110-5830-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01478AN
Electric Depreciation Fund
$375,000 GL: 43110-5830-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01481AN
Electric Depreciation Fund
$37,500 GL: 43110-5830-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01479AN
Electric Depreciation Fund
$41,250 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01442AN
Building Maintenance
Fund
76 of 383

5d9
25-87850
6 7
0 2
$232,500 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01045AN
Building Maintenance
Fund
$37,500 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01445AN
Building Maintenance
Fund
$195,000 GL: 43110-2570-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01453AN
Transit Prop C Local Fund
$45,000 GL: 43110-5300-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01453AN
Refuse Disposal Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Public Works Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable for this report.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company submitted their proposals or recommended for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibits 1-18, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council may elect not to award the PSAs as recommended herein.

This would result in the delay of the construction of the vital Facilities CIP in the city.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Celina Minas, Project Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Carrier Johnson + Culture Exhibit 2: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Malekian & Associates, Inc.

Exhibit 3: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Struere
Exhibit 4: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Westgroup Designs, Inc. 77 of 383

5d10
25-87850
6 7
0 2
Exhibit 5: Campaign Disclosure Forms for PracticeLA.

Exhibit 6: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Albert Group Architects.

Exhibit 7: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Infrastructure Architects, Inc Exhibit 8: Campaign Disclosure Forms for TR Design Group, Inc.

Exhibit 9: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Bowman consulting Group, Ltd.

Exhibit 10: Campaign Disclosure Forms for CWE
Exhibit 11: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Omnia Consulting Group, LLC.

Exhibit 12: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

Exhibit 13: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Albert A. Webb Associates Exhibit 14: Campaign Disclosure Forms for EPTDESIGN
Exhibit 15: Campaign Disclosure Forms for DCI Engineers Exhibit 16: Campaign Disclosure Forms for John A Martin & Associates, Inc.

Exhibit 17: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Budlong & Associates, Inc.

Exhibit 18: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Exhibit 19: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Cumming Management Group, Inc.

Exhibit 20: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Citadel CPM, Inc.

Exhibit 21: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Maestro Development, LLC Exhibit 22: Campaign Disclosure Forms for Z&K Consultants, Inc.

Exhibit 23: Campaign Disclosure Forms for CLMI Group
78 of 383

1 6
7 0
5 MOTION
Moved by Council Member ,
seconded by Council Member , that the Council of
the City of Glendale hereby:
1) Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute PSAs for an initial three-year duration from the date of the contract execution, with an option to extend each PSA annually for up to two (2) additional years, and to execute any necessary amendments thereto, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, for an aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $3,600,000 to be shared among the consultant PSAs with the following firms in their respective disciplines:
a. Carrier Johnson + Culture, Struere, Westgroup Designs, Inc., Malekian & Associates, Inc., PracticeLA, Albert Group Architects, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and Infrastructure Architects, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Architectural Services.
b. EPTDESIGN and Albert A. Webb Associates, to provide On-Call Professional Landscape Architectural Services.
c. CWE, Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Civil Engineering Services.
d. John A. Martin & Associates, Inc., DCI Engineers, and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Structural Engineering Services.
e. Budlong & Associates, Inc. and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Electrical, Mechanical, and Plumbing Engineering Services.
f. Citadel CPM, Inc., Cumming Management Group, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Maestro Development, LLC, and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Project Management Services.
g. Maestro Development, LLC, Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, Cumming Management Group, Inc., Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., and CLMI Group, LLC, to provide 79 of 383

1 6
7 0
5 On-Call Professional Construction Management Services. h. Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Z&K Consultants, Inc., and Maestro Development, LLC in partnership with The Anaheim Group (TAG), to provide On-Call Professional Inspection Services.
i. Cumming Management Group, Inc. and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Cost Estimating Services.
j. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Quality Assurance and Quality Control Services.
k. Maestro Development, LLC in partnership with 3QC, and Cumming Management Group, Inc., to provide On-Call Professional Commissioning Services.
l. Carrier Johnson + Culture, to provide On-Call Professional Specification Writing Services.
m. Carrier Johnson + Culture, to provide On-Call Professional Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Services.
n. CLMI Group, LLC, Cumming Management Group, Inc., Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., and Omnia Consulting Group, LLC, to provide On-Call Professional Staff Augmentation Services.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
80 of 383

EXHIBIT 1
81 of 383

EXHIBIT 1
82 of 383

EXHIBIT 1
83 of 383

EXHIBIT 2
84 of 383

EXHIBIT 2
85 of 383

EXHIBIT 2
86 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance ”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a co ntractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Silva Zeitlian
Hraztan Zeitlian
3324 Grand View Blvd. Los Angeles CA 90066 3324 Grand View Blvd. Los Angeles CA 90066 N/A
N/A
N/A
Struere 3324 Grand View Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90066
EXHIBIT 3
87 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
111
• I hereby certify that:
▪ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ▪ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and
▪ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3324 Grand View Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90066
310.748.7649 : [email protected]
Hraztan Zeitlian
November 2 25 Los Angeles
3 EXHIBIT 3
89 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance ”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a co ntractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
N/A
Westgroup Designs, Inc
EXHIBIT 4
90 of 383

31 RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and
N/A
N/A
EXHIBIT 4
91 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

111

• I hereby certify that:
▪ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ▪ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and
▪ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Shazad Ghanbari
3 November 1 25 Irvine
19900 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 1000, Irvine, CA 92612
949.250.0880 / [email protected]
EXHIBIT 4
92 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 5
93 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

111

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

EXHIBIT 5
95 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Albert Group Architects 1745 Berkely Street, Studio 4; Santa Monica, CA 90404 Stephen M. Albert
Laurie S. Albert
Richard Gill
1745 Berkely Street, Studio 4
1745 Berkely Street, Studio 4
1745 Berkely Street, Studio 4
Santa Monica CA 90404
Santa Monica CA 90404
Santa Monica CA 90404
EXHIBIT 6
96 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and
John Paul Youssef
John Paul Youssef
John Paul Youssef
John Paul Youssef
John Paul Youssef
John Paul Youssef and Isis Youssef
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
90071
90071
90071
90071
90071
90071
EXHIBIT 6
Nabih Youssef & Associates 550 S. Hope St, Ste 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90071 98 of 383

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
2 October 23 25 Los Angeles
John Paul Youssef
550 S. Hope St, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90071
213.362.0707, [email protected]
EXHIBIT 6
99 of 383

Proposal for ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RFQ No. PWA 2025 -003 City of Glendale – November 03, 2025
31 | Page

EXHIBIT 7
100 of 383

Proposal for ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RFQ No. PWA 2025 -003 City of Glendale – November 03, 2025
32 | Page

EXHIBIT 7
101 of 383

Proposal for ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RFQ No. PWA 2025 -003 City of Glendale – November 03, 2025
33 | Page

EXHIBIT 7
102 of 383

/0 /1 /2 □ /4 /5 /6 □ /7 /8/9 □ /10 /11 /10 /12 /13 /11 /11 /14 □ □
/17 /18 /19 □
□
/21 /22 □ /21 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /25 /29 /30 /31 □ /32 □ /26 /33 /34/35 /33 /24 /36 /37 □ /38 /24 /37 /33 /37 /26 /31 □ /28 /30 /21 /24 /37 /33 /37 /26 /31 □ /39 □ /26 /28 /37 /40 /30 /33 /26 /40 /28 /30 /25 □ /33 /37 /21 □ /25 /29 /41 /26 /28 /37 /40 /30 /33 /26 /40 /28 /30 /25□ □
/42 /43 /44 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /45 /5 /49 /50 /51 /46 /52 □ /53 /54 /5 /55 /47 /44 /54 □ /56 /57 /54 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 □ /4 /5 /6 □ /12 /58 /59 /59 /60 □ /61 /45 /53 /62 /55 /53 /46 /63 /50 □ /1 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 □ /56 /57 /54 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 /60 /64 □ /65 /43 /46 /51 /43 □ /66 /44 /51 /53 /62 /44 □ /44 /67 /67 /44 /51 /47 /46 /68 /44 □ /5 /50 □ /69 /44 /55 /47 /44 /62 /66 /44 /57 □ /70 /60 □ /10 /11 /71 /71 /60 □ /53 /50 /54 □ /53 /62 /44 /50 /54 /44 /54 □ /46 /47 □ /65 /46 /47 /43 □ /56 /57 /54 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 □ /4 /5 /6 □ /12 /58 /72 /73 /60 □ /65 /43 /46 /51 /43 □ /66 /44 /51 /53 /62 /44 □ /44 /67 /67 /44 /51 /47 /46 /68 /44 □ /5 /50 □ /74 /53 /57 /51 /43 □ /71 /12 /60 □ /10 /11 /71 /10 □ /75 /61 /47 /43 /44 □ /56 /57 /54 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 /64 /76 /6 □ □ /42 /43 /44 □ /56 /57 /54 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 □ /55 /57 /5 /43 /46 /66 /46 /47 /77 /78 □ □ /75 /71 /76 □ /9 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 /85 □ /86 /87 /81 /79 /88 /89 /90 /87 /81 /91 □ /84 □ /92 /89 /93 /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 /85 /85 /76 /94□ /65 /43 /5 □ /43 /53 /77 □ /53 □ /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 □ /65 /46 /47 /43 □ /47 /43 /44 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /5 /67 □ /95 /52 /44 /50 /54 /53 /52 /44 □ /75 /61 /45 /46 /47 /48 /64 /76 /60 □ /95 /52 /44 /50 /54 /53 /52 /44 □ /69 /49 /51 /51 /44 /77 /77 /5 /57 □ /9 /63 /44 /50 /51 /48 □ /5 /57 □ /95 /52 /44 /50 /54 /53 /52 /44 □ /0 /44 /54 /44 /68 /44 /52 /5 /55 /62 /44 /50 /47 □ /9 /63 /44 /50 /51 /48 □ /75 /61 /95 /69 /9 /64 /76 /60 □ /5 /57 □ /47 /43 /44 □ /96 /5 /49 /77 /46 /50 /63 □ /9 /49 /47 /43 /5 /57 /46 /47 /48 □ /5 /67 □ /47 /43 /44 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /5 /67 □ /95 /52 /44 /50 /54 /53 /52 /44 □ /75 /61 /96 /9 /64 /76 □ /53 /50 /54 □ /47 /43 /53 /47 □ /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 □ /46 /77 □ /77 /49 /66 /97 /44 /51 /47 □ /47 /5 □ /53 /55 /55 /57 /5 /98 /84 /88 □ /93 /99 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /45 /5 /49 /50 /51 /46 /52 /60 □ /95 /69 /9 /60 □ /5 /57 □ /96 /9 /94□ /67 /57 /5 /62 □ /62 /53 /102 /46 /50 /63 □ /53 □ /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /46 /66 /49 /47 /46 /5 /50 □ /47 /5 □ /53 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /45 /5 /49 /50 /51 /46 /52 □ /62 /44 /62 /66 /44 /57 /60 □ /95 /69 /9 □ /62 /44 /62 /66 /44 /57 /60 □ /96 /9 □ /62 /44 /62 /66 /44 /57 /60 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /45 /52 /44 /57 /102 /60 □ /5 /57 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /42 /57 /44 /84 /92 /89 /83 /101 /83 /103 □ /84 /81 /90 □ /86 /104 /105 □ /106 /80 /89 /81 /79 /87 /88 □ /107 /101 /107 /93 /101 /83 /92 /108 □ /109 /110 /111 □ /107 /101 /107 /93 /101 /83 /92 /108 □ /84 /81 /90 □ /112 /111 □ /107 /101 /107 /93 /101 /83 /92 □ /113 /83 /80 /107 □ /98 /80 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /80 /81 □ /107 /84 /82 /82 /101 /83 /92 □ /79 /80 /81 /79 /101 /83 /81 /87 /81 /91 □ /84 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 □ /84 /113 /113 /101 /79 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /84 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 □ /80 /83 □ /92 /89 /93 /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 □ /114 /100 /80 □ /100 /84 /92 □ /115 /83 /80 /98 /87 /90 /101 /90 □ /84 □ /79 /84 /107 /115 /84 /87 /91 /81 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /87 /93 /89 /82 /87 /80 /81 /116 □ □ □□ /117 /100 /101 □ /115 /83 /80 /98 /87 /92 /87 /80 /81 /92 □ /80 /113 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /118 /83 /90 /87 /81 /84 /81 /79 /101 □ /83 /101 /92 /82 /83 /87 /79 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /106 /80 /89 /81 /79 /87 /88 □ /107 /101 /107 /93 /101 /83 /92 □ /113 /83 /80 /107 □ /98 /80 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /80 /81 □ /107 /84 /82 /82 /101 /83 /92 □ /84 /113 /113 /101 /79 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /79 /84 /107 /115 /84 /87 /91 /81 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /87 /93 /89 /82 /80 /83 /92 □ /84 /115 /115 /88 /87 /101 /92 □ /82 /80 □ /84 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 □ /65 /43 /5 /77 /44 □ /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 □ /57 /44 /120 /49 /46 /57 /44 /77 □ /47 /43 /44 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /45 /5 /49 /50 /51 /46 /52 /121 /77 /60 □ /95 /69 /9 /121 /77 /60 □ /5 /57 □ /96 /9 /121 /77 □ /53 /55 /55 /57 /5 /68 /53 /52 /60 □ /53 /50 /54 □ /77 /55 /44 /51 /46 /67 /46 /44 /54 □ /77 /49 /66 /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 /5 /57 /77 /6 □ □ /9 □ /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 □ /65 /46 /47 /43 □ /47 /43 /44 □ /45 /46 /47 /48 /60 □ /109 /110 /111 /108 □ /80 /83 □ /112 /111 □ /87 /92 □ /102 /50 /5 /65 /50 □ /53 /77 □ /53 □ /61 /45 /46 /47 /48 □ /45 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 /6 /64 □ □ /42 /43 /44 □ /56 /57 /54 /46 /50 /53 /50 /51 /44 □ /44 /122 /51 /52 /49 /54 /44 /77 □ /53 □ /51 /5 /62 /55 /44 /47 /46 /47 /46 /68 /44 /52 /48 □ /66 /46 /54 □ /51 /5 /50 /47 /57 /53 /51 /47 □ /53 /65 /53 /57 /54 /44 /54 □ /47 /5 □ /47 /43 /44 □ /52 /5 /65 /44 /77 /47 □ /57 /44 /77 /55 /5 /50 /77 /46 /66 /52 /44 □ /66 /87 /90 /90 /101 /83 /116 □□ /117 /80 □ /84 /92 /92 /87 /92 /82 □ /107 /101 /107 /93 /101 /83 /92 □ /80 /113 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /106 /87 /82 /99 □ /106 /80 /89 /81 /79 /87 /88 /108 □ /109 /110 /111 /108 □ /84 /81 /90 □ /112 /111 □ /93 /101 /113 /80 /83 /101 □ /82 /100 /101 /99 □ /98 /80 /82 /101 □ /80 /81 □ /84 □ /107 /84 /82 /82 /101 /83 □ /83 /101 /91 /84 /83 /90 /87 /81 /91 □ /84 □ /106 /87 /82 /99 □ /106 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /108 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /118 /83 /90 /87 /81 /84 /81 /79 /101 □ /83 /101 /123 /89 /87 /83 /101 /92 □ /106 /87 /82 /99 □ /92 /82 /84 /113 /113 □ /82 /80 □ /115 /83 /101 /115 /84 /83 /101 □ /82 /100 /87 /92 □ /83 /101 /115 /80 /83 /82 □ /114 /100 /87 /79 /100 □ /90 /87 /92 /79 /88 /80 /92 /101 /92 □ /79 /101 /83 /82 /84 /87 /81 □ /87 /81 /113 /80 /83 /107 /84 /82 /87 /80 /81 □ /84 /93 /80 /89 /82 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 □ /83 /101 /79 /101 /87 /98 /87 /81 /91 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /106 /87 /82 /99 □ /106 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /108 □ /84 /81 /90 □ /92 /115 /101 /79 /87 /113 /87 /101 /90 □ /92 /89 /93 /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 /86 /92 /105 □ /114 /80 /83 /124 /87 /81 /91 □ /89 /81 /90 /101 /83 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /106 /87 /82 /99 □ /106 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /116 □ □ □
/125 /126 /127 /128 /129 /130 /131 /132 /133 /128 /126 □ /132 /135 /131 /132 □ /130 /136 /137 /132 □ /138 /139 □ /140 /133 /137 /141 /142 /128 /137 /139 /140 /143 □/144 □ /146 /84 /107 /101 □ /80 /113 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /115 /101 /83 /92 /80 /81 /108 □ /101 /81 /82 /87 /82 /99 /108 □ /80 /83 □ /80 /83 /91 /84 /81 /87 /147 /84 /82 /87 /80 /81 □ /86 /87 /116 /101 /116 /108 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /106 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 □ /80 /83 □ /110 /89 /93 /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /84 /79 /82 /80 /83 /105 □ □ /144 □ /146 /84 /107 /101 □ /80 /113 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /106 /100 /87 /101 /113 □ /148 /149 /101 /79 /89 /82 /87 /98 /101 □ /118 /113 /113 /87 /79 /101 /83 /150 /151 /83 /101 /92 /87 /90 /101 /81 /82 □ /144 □ /106 /100 /87 /101 /113 □ /118 /115 /101 /83 /84 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /118 /113 /113 /87 /79 /101 /83 □ □ /144 □ /106 /100 /87 /101 /113 □ /152 /87 /81 /84 /81 /79 /87 /84 /88 □ /118 /113 /113 /87 /79 /101 /83 □ /144 □ /106 /100 /84 /87 /83 /115 /101 /83 /92 /80 /81 □ /144 □ /111 /88 /88 □ /107 /101 /107 /93 /101 /83 /92 □ /80 /113 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /153 /80 /84 /83 /90 □ /80 /113 □ /154 /87 /83 /101 /79 /82 /80 /83 /92 □ /144 □ /111 /88 /88 □ /115 /101 /83 /92 /80 /81 /92 □ /114 /100 /80 □ /80 /114 /81 □ /107 /80 /83 /101 □ /82 /100 /84 /81 □ /155 /156 /157 □ /80 /113 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /115 /101 /83 /92 /80 /81 /108 □ /101 /81 /82 /87 /82 /99 /108 □ /80 /83 □ /80 /83 /91 /84 /81 /87 /147 /84 /82 /87 /80 /81 □ □ /144 □ /146 /84 /107 /101 □ /80 /113 □ /84 /81 /99 □ /79 /84 /107 /115 /84 /87 /91 /81 □ /79 /80 /107 /107 /87 /82 /82 /101 /101 □ /80 /114 /81 /101 /90 □ /80 /83 □ /79 /80 /81 /82 /83 /80 /88 /88 /101 /90 □ /93 /99 □ /82 /100 /101 □ /115 /101 /83 /92 /80 /81 /108 □ /101 /81 /82 /87 /82 /99 /108 □ /80 /83 □ /80 /83 /91 /84 /81 /87 /147 /84 /82 /87 /80 /81 □ □
/158 /142 /139 /131 /137 /139 □ /141 /128 /130 /159 /142 /139 /132 /139 □ /132 /135 /139 □ /127 /128 /142 /142 /128 /160 /133 /126 /161 □ /140 /133 /137 /141 /142 /128 /137 /136 /129 /139 □ /127 /128 /129 /130 /143 □□ /162 /163 /164 /165 /166 /167 /168 /165 /163 /166 /169 /170 /171 /85 /172 □ /173 /167 /174 /175 □ /176 /177 /177 /166 /175 /170 /170 □ □ □
/178 /179 /180 /180 □ /173 /167 /174 /175 □/181 /182 /165 /180 /175 □ /183 /179 /170 /182 /164 /175 /170 /170 □ /176 /177 /177 /166 /175 /170 /170 □/162 /182 /165 /184 □/185 /165 /167 /165 /175 □/186 /182 /187 □ □ /106 /100 /84 /87 /83 /115 /101 /83 /92 /80 /81 □□ □ □ □ □ /106 /100 /87 /101 /113 □ /148 /149 /101 /79 /89 /82 /87 /98 /101 □ /118 /113 /113 /87 /79 /101 /83 □ /150 □ /151 /83 /101 /92 /87 /90 /101 /81 /82 □□ □ □ □ □ /106 /100 /87 /101 /113 □ /118 /115 /101 /83 /84 /82 /87 /81 /91 □ /118 /113 /113 /87 /79 /101 /83 □□ □ □ □ □ /106 /100 /87 /101 /113 □ /152 /87 /81 /84 /81 /79 /87 /84 /88 □ /118 /113 /113 /87 /79 /101 /83 □□ □ □ □ □ /153 /80 /84 /83 /90 □ /80 /113 □ /154 /87 /83 /101 /79 /82 /80 /83 /92 □□ □ □ □

THOMAS RIGGLE
2900 ADAMS ST., STUDIO A-400 RIVERSIDE CA 92504 EXHIBIT 8
103 of 383

/0 /1 /2 □ /4 /5 /6 □ /7 /8/9 □ /10 /11 /10 /12 /13 /11 /11 /14 □ □
/17 /17 /18 □
□
□ /20 /21 /22 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /27 □ /28 /29 /30 □ /31 /27 /24 /23 /22 /23 /32 /24 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /22 □□ □ □ □ /34 □ /36 /37 /5 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 /5 /40 /43 □ /31 /32 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /23 /27 /24 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /21 /22 /47 /26 /27 /31 /48 /26 /24 /31 /21 /27 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /31 /32 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /44 /26 /22 /24 /46 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /44 /22 /21 /32 /44 /23 /49 /24 /31 /50 /23 □ /44 /26 /22 /24 /46 /45 □ /24 /21 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 □ /33 /31 /24 /25 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /51 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /52 /53 /54 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /55 /54 /56 □ □ □ /57 /27 □ /26 /58 /58 /31 /24 /31 /21 /27 □ /24 /21 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /27 /26 /59 /23 □ /21 /60 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /23 /27 /24 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /51 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 /21 /22 □ /59 /61 /32 /24 □ /26 /62 /32 /21 □ /58 /31 /32 /49 /62 /21 /32 /23 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /27 /26 /59 /23 /63 /32 /64 □ /21 /60 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /65 /66 /40 /67 /5 /38 /68 /67 /69 □ /66 /38 /39 /70 /39 /71 /68 /67 /69 □ /5 /40 □ /5 /40 /72 /41 /38 /70 /73 /41 /39 /70 /5 /38 /68 /67 □ /74 /21 /26 /22 /58 □ /21 /60 □ /75 /31 /22 /23 /49 /24 /21 /22 /32 /45 □ /31 /24 /32 □ /51 /25 /26 /31 /22 /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /76 /77 /23 /49 /61 /24 /31 /50 /23 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 /45 □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /79 /31 /27 /26 /27 /49 /31 /26 /62 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 /45 □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /78 /44 /23 /22 /26 /24 /31 /27 /47 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 /45 □ /26 /27 /46 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 □ /33 /31 /24 /25 □ /26 /27 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /22 /32 /25 /31 /44 □ /31 /27 /24 /23 /22 /23 /32 /24 □ /21 /60 □ /59 /21 /22 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /27 □ /24 /23 /27 □ /44 /23 /22 /49 /23 /27 /24 □ /63 /28 /29 /30 /64 □ /31 /27 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /23 /27 /24 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /21 /22 /47 /26 /27 /31 /48 /26 /24 /31 /21 /27 /45 □ /26 /27 /58 □ /26 /27 /46 □ /49 /26 /59 /44 /26 /31 /47 /27 □ /49 /21 /59 /59 /31 /24 /24 /23 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /31 /32 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /58 □ /21 /22 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /21 /62 /62 /23 /58 □ /80 /46 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /23 /27 /24 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /21 /22 /47 /26 /27 /31 /48 /26 /24 /31 /21 /27 /6 □ □ /7 /81 /66 /41 /67 /66 □ /82 /70 /67 /42 /81 /5 /67 /66 □ /39 /83 /66 /67 /66 □ /65 /66 /40 /67 /5 /38 /67 /68 □ /27 /26 /59 /23 /32 □ /26 /27 /58 □ /80 /61 /32 /31 /27 /23 /32 /32 □ /26 /58 /58 /22 /23 /32 /32 /23 /32 /56 □ □ □ /84 /85 /86 /87 /88 /89 /90 /91 /92 /87 /90 /88 /91 /93 /94 /95 /34 /34 /96 □ /97 /92 /98 /99 □ /100 /101 /101 /91 /99 /94 /94 □
□ □
/102 /85 /103 /103 □ /97 /92 /98 /99 □/104 /105 /90 /103 /99 □ /106 /85 /94 /105 /89 /99 /94 /94 □ /100 /101 /101 /91 /99 /94 /94 □/107 /105 /90 /108 □ /84 /90 /92 /90 /99 □/109 /105 /110 □ □ /51 /25 /26 /31 /22 /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 □□ □ □ □
□ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /76 /77 /23 /49 /61 /24 /31 /50 /23 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 □ /111 □ /112 /22 /23 /32 /31 /58 /23 /27 /24 □□ □ □ □ □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /78 /44 /23 /22 /26 /24 /31 /27 /47 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 □□ □ □ □ □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /79 /31 /27 /26 /27 /49 /31 /26 /62 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 □□ □ □ □ □ /74 /21 /26 /22 /58 □ /21 /60 □ /75 /31 /22 /23 /49 /24 /21 /22 /32 □□ □ □ □ □ /20 /21 /22 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /27 □ /28 /29 /30 □ /31 /27 /24 /23 /22 /23 /32 /24 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /22 □□ □ □ □ /34 /34 □/36 /113 /114 /115 /42 /5 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 /5 /40 /43 □ /70 /67 □ /39 /83 /66 □ /65 /66 /40 /67 /5 /38 /69 □ /66 /38 /39 /70 /39 /71 /69 □ /5 /40 □ /5 /40 /72 /41 /38 /70 /73 /41 /39 /70 /5 /38 □ /39 /83 /41 /39 □ /83 /41 /67 □ /66 /38 /39 /66 /40 /66 /82 □ /70 /38 /39 /5 □ /41 □ /42 /5 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 □ /116 /5 /40 □ /39 /83 /66 □ /65 /66 /40 /116 /5 /40 /117 /41 /38 /42 /66 □ /5 /116 □ /41 /81 /81 □ /5 /40 □ /41 □ /65 /5 /40 /39 /70 /21 /27 □ /21 /60 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /33 /21 /22 /118 □ /61 /27 /58 /23 /22 /24 /26 /118 /23 /27 □ /61 /27 /58 /23 /22 □ /26 /27 □ /26 /47 /22 /23 /23 /59 /23 /27 /24 □ /33 /31 /24 /25 □ /26 /27 □ /26 /22 /49 /25 /31 /24 /23 /49 /24 /45 □ /58 /23 /32 /31 /47 /27 □ /44 /22 /21 /60 /23 /32 /32 /31 /21 /27 /26 /62 /45 □ /23 /27 /47 /31 /27 /23 /23 /22 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /47 /23 /27 /23 /22 /26 /62 □ /21 /22 □ /44 /22 /31 /59 /23 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 /45 □ /61 /32 /61 /26 /62 /62 /46 □ /80 /46 □ /26 □ /47 /23 /27 /23 /22 /26 /62 □ /21 /22 □ /44 /22 /31 /59 /23 □ /42 /5 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 /5 /40 /6 □ □ /119 /5 /114 □ /117 /114 /67 /39 □ /41 /81 /67 /5 □ /82 /70 /67 /42 /81 /5 /67 /66 □ /39 /83 /66 □ /38 /41 /117 /66 /67 □ /5 /116 □ /39 /83 /66 □ /113 /114 /115 /42 /5 /38 /39 /40 /41 /42 /39 /5 /40 /68 /67 □ /74 /21 /26 /22 /58 □ /21 /60 □ /75 /31 /22 /23 /49 /24 /21 /22 /32 /45 □ /31 /24 /32 □ /51 /25 /26 /31 /22 /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /76 /77 /23 /49 /61 /24 /31 /50 /23 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 /45 □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /79 /31 /27 /26 /27 /49 /31 /26 /62 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 /45 □ /51 /25 /31 /23 /60 □ /78 /44 /23 /22 /26 /24 /31 /27 /47 □ /78 /60 /60 /31 /49 /23 /22 /45 □ /26 /27 /46 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 □ /33 /31 /24 /25 □ /26 /27 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /22 /32 /25 /31 /44 □ /31 /27 /24 /23 /22 /23 /32 /24 □ /21 /60 □ /59 /21 /22 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /27 □ /24 /23 /27 □ /44 /23 /22 /49 /23 /27 /24 □ /63 /28 /29 /30 /64 □ /31 /27 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /23 /27 /24 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /21 /22 /47 /26 /27 /31 /48 /26 /24 /31 /21 /27 /45 □ /26 /27 /58 □ /26 /27 /46 □ /49 /26 /59 /44 /26 /31 /47 /27 □ /49 /21 /59 /59 /31 /24 /24 /23 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /31 /32 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /58 □ /21 /22 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /21 /62 /62 /23 /58 □ /80 /46 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /44 /23 /22 /32 /21 /27 /45 □ /23 /27 /24 /31 /24 /46 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /21 /22 /47 /26 /27 /31 /48 /26 /24 /31 /21 /27 /56 □ □ /54 /80 /21 /50 /23 □ /44 /62 /23 /26 /32 /23 □ /58 /31 /32 /49 /62 /21 /32 /23 □ /24 /25 /23 /32 /23 □ /65 /66 /40 /67 /5 /38 /67 /68 □ /38 /41 /117 /66 □ /41 /38 /82 □ /115 /114 /67 /70 /38 /66 /67 /67 □ /41 /82 /82 /40 /66 /67 /67 /6 □ □ □ □
/51
/26 /59 /44 /26 /31 /47 /27 □ /51 /21 /59 /59 /31 /24 /24 /23 /23 □ /21 /33 /27 /23 /58 □ /21 /22 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /21 /62 /62 /23 /58 □ /80 /46 /120 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ /104 /105 /90 /103 /99 □ /106 /85 /94 /105 /89 /99 /94 /94 □ /100 /101 /101 /91 /99 /94 /94 □/107 /105 /90 /108 □ /84 /90 /92 /90 /99 □/109 /105 /110 □ □ □ □ □ □
□
/107 /122 /123 /104 /124 /102 /124 /107 /100 /104 /124 /125 /97 □ □□
/78 /27 □ /80 /23 /25 /26 /62 /60 □ /21 /60 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /26 /80 /21 /50 /23 /126 /27 /26 /59 /23 /58 □□/51 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 /21 /22 □□/53 /61 /80 /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 /21 /22 /120 □□ /128
□ /57 □ /26 /49 /118 /27 /21 /33 /62 /23 /58 /47 /23 □ /24 /25 /26 /24 □ /57 □ /25 /26 /50 /23 □ /26 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /31 /27 /61 /31 /27 /47 □ /21 /80 /62 /31 /47 /26 /24 /31 /21 /27 □ /24 /21 □ /61 /44 /58 /26 /24 /23 □ /24 /25 /31 /32 □ /58 /31 /32 /49 /62 /21 /32 /61 /22 /23 □ /60 /21 /22 /59 □ /31 /60 □ /57 □ /32 /61 /80 /32 /24 /31 /24 /61 /24 /23 /129□ /21 /22 □ /31 /60 □ /57 □ /32 /23 /62 /23 /49 /24 □ /26 /58 /58 /31 /24 /31 /21 /27 /26 /62 /129□ /26 /22 /49 /25 /31 /24 /23 /49 /24 /32 /45 □ /58 /23 /32 /31 /47 /27 □ /44 /22 /21 /60 /23 /32 /32 /31 /21 /27 /26 /62 /32 /45 □ /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 /21 /22 /32 /45 □ /21 /22 □ /32 /61 /80 /49 /21 /27 /24 /22 /26 /49 /24 /21 /22 /32 □ /33 /31 /24 /25 /31 /27 □ /24 /23 /27 □ /63 /28 /29 /64 □ /58 /26 /46 /32 □ /21 /60 □ /24 /25 /23 □ /32 /23 /62 /23 /49 /24 /31 /21 /27 □ /21 /22 □ /49 /25 /26 /27 /47 /23 /130 □ /26 /27 /58 □□
PAMELA FORBES RIGGLE VICTORIA AVE. RIVERSIDE CA 92504 X
EXHIBIT 8
104 of 383

/0 /1 /2 □ /4 /5 /6 □ /7 /8/9 □ /10 /11 /10 /12 /13 /11 /11 /14 □ □
/17 /17 /17 □
□
/19 □ /20 □ /21 /22 /23 /22 /24 /25 □ /26 /22 /23 /27 /28 /29 /25 □ /27 /21 /30 /27 /31 □ /32
□ /20 □ /21 /30 /33 /22 □ /28 /34 /22 /35 /27 /28 /29 /28 /22 /34 □ /30 /36 /36 □ /37 /22 /23 /38 /39 /35 /38 □ /29 /39 /23 □ /40 /21 /28 /26 /21 □ /27 /21 /22 □ /41 /23 /34 /28 /35 /30 /35 /26 /22 □ /23 /22 /42 /43 /28 /23 /22 /38 □ /34 /28 /38 /26 /36 /39 /38 /43 /23 /22 /44 □ /32 □ /45 /21 /22 □ /28 /35 /29 /39 /23 /46 /30 /27 /28 /39 /35 □ /28 /35 □ /27 /21 /28 /38 □ /34 /28 /38 /26 /36 /39 /38 /43 /23 /22 □ /29 /39 /23 /46 □ /47 /30 /35 /34 □ /30 /35 /25 □ /30 /27 /27 /30 /26 /21 /46 /22 /35 /27 □ /27 /39 □ /27 /21 /28 /38 □ /29 /39 /23 /46 /48 □ /28 /38 □ /27 /23 /43 /22 /49 □ /30 /26 /26 /43 /23 /30 /27 /22 /49 □ /26 /39 /23 /23 /22 /26 /27 /49 □ /30 /35 /34 □ /26 /39 /46 /37 /36 /22 /27 /22 /44 □ /30 /35 /34 □
/32 □ /20 □ /21 /30 /33 /22 □ /24 /22 /22 /35 □ /36 /22 /50 /30 /36 /36 /25 □ /30 /43 /27 /21 /39 /23 /28 /51 /22 /34 □ /27 /39 □ /38 /43 /24 /46 /28 /27 □ /27 /21 /28 /38 □ /34 /28 /38 /26 /36 /39 /38 /43 /23 /22 □ /29 /39 /23 /46 /52 □ □
/20 /35 □ /27 /39 /27 /30 /36 /49 □ /27 /21 /28 /38 □ /34 /28 /38 /26 /36 /39 /38 /43 /23 /22 □ /29 /39 /23 /46 □ /47 /28 /35 /26 /36 /43 /34 /28 /35 /50 □ /30 /27 /27 /30 /26 /21 /46 /22 /35 /27 /38 /48 □ /28 /38 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ /37 /30 /50 /22 /38 /52 □ □
/53 /54 /22 /26 /43 /27 /22 /34 □ /39 /35 /31 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ /49 □ /55 /56 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ /49 □ /30 /27 /31 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ /49 □ /57 /30 /36 /28 /29 /39 /23 /35 /28 /30 /52 □ □
/58 /28 /50 /35 /30 /27 /43 /23 /22 /31 □ □ □ □ □ /59 /23 /28 /35 /27 □ /60 /43 /36 /36 □ /61 /30 /46 /22 /31 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □
□ □
/62 /34 /34 /23 /22 /38 /38 /31 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □
□
/59 /21 /39 /35 /22 □ /61 /43 /46 /24 /22 /23 /31 □ /53 /63 /46 /30 /28 /36 □ /62 /34 /34 /23 /22 /38 /38 /31 □ □□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 3 OCTOBER 30
25 RIVERSIDE

THOMAS RIGGLE
2900 ADAMS STREET, RIVERSIDE, CA 92504
(951) 742-7179 / [email protected]
EXHIBIT 8
105 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. 3060 Saturn Street, Brea, CA 92821 Daniel G. Swayze
Gary P. Bowman
Bruce J. Labovitz
Raymond Vicks, Virginia Grebbien
James Laurito, Patricia Mulroy, Stephen Riddick,
12355 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste 520
12355 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste 520
12355 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste 520
12355 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste 520
12355 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste 520
20191
20191
20191
20191
20191
VAReston
Reston
Reston
Reston
Reston VA
VA
VA
VA
James Laurito

1. FORMS
52 Bowman | City of Glendale On-Call Services for Facilities CIP Projects - Civil Engineering EXHIBIT 9
106 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and
Gary P. Bowman 20191VA12355 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste 520 Reston 23011 Moulton Pkwy, SuiteD7 Laguna Hills CA 92653
Parviz Azar
Parviz Azar
Parviz Azar
Parviz Azar
Parviz Azar
23011 Moulton Pkwy, Suite D7 Laguna Hills CA 92653
23011 Moulton Pkwy, Suite D7 Laguna Hills CA 92653
23011 Moulton Pkwy, Suite D7 Laguna Hills CA 92653
23011 Moulton Pkwy, Suite D7 Laguna Hills CA 92653
Parviz Azar 23011 Moulton Pkwy, Suite D7 Laguna Hills CA 92653 23011 Moulton Pkwy, Suite D7, Laguna Hills, CA 92653P.A. & Associates, Inc.

1. FORMS
53 Bowman | City of Glendale On-Call Services for Facilities CIP Projects - Civil Engineering EXHIBIT 9
107 of 383

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 Farzad Dorrani
October 30 25 Brea
3060 Saturn Street, Brea, CA 92821
714.940.0100 / [email protected]

1. FORMS
54 Bowman | City of Glendale On-Call Services for Facilities CIP Projects - Civil Engineering EXHIBIT 9
108 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
CWE 1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240, Fullerton, CA 92831 Jason Pereira
Farooq Qureshi
Vik Bapna
Vik Bapna, Jason Pereira, Farooq Qureshi, Katie Harrel
1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240
1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240
1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240
1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240
Fullerton
Fullerton
Fullerton
Fullerton
CA
CA
CA
CA
92831
92831
92831
92831
Vik Bapna 1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 Fullerton CA 92831 EXHIBIT 10
109 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 October 31 25 Fullerton
Vik Bapna
1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240, Fullerton, California 92831 (714) 526-7500 Ext. 212 / [email protected]
EXHIBIT 10
111 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744 , “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on Ma rch 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Bilyana Decker
Jennifer Saliba
303 North Glenn Oaks Blvd, Suite 200
303 North Glenn Oaks Blvd, Suite 200
Burbank
CA
CA
91502
91502
Burbank
EXHIBIT 11
112 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA , or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person , entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campai
gn Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of
the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
x I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and
Jose Chacon
1401 21st Street, Suite 12995
Sacramento
CA
95811
EXHIBIT 11
113 of 383

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 25
Glendale
November 2
Bilyana Decker
303 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 200, Burbank, CA 91502
818-434-5598: [email protected]
EXHIBIT 11
114 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
President
Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. (Southstar | DCCM) 1945 Chicago Ave Unit C-2 Riverside, CA 92507
1945 Chicago Ave Unit C-2
1945 Chicago Ave Unit C-2
1945 Chicago Ave Unit C-2
1945 Chicago Ave Unit C-2
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
CA
CA
CA
CA
92507
92507
92507
92507
Yvette Kirrin, PE
Jason Bennecke, PE, MBA, PMP
Amr Abuelhassan, PE, MS, QSD
Jason Bennecke - CEO
EXHIBIT 12
115 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and
Zach Siviglia, PE
Kim Post
Chad Caldwell
Zach Siviglia, Matt Brogan, Sasha
Dansky, Shawn O'Keefe, Dave Moritz,
Aaron Silva, Alyson Watson, Cindy
Milrany
516 Gibson Drive, Suite 230
516 Gibson Drive, Suite 230
701 University Avenue, Suite 200
2833 Junction Avenue, Suite 110
Various
Roseville
Roseville
Sacramento
Zach Siviglia
Various
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
95678
95678
95825
95134
Various
None
X
None
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

EXHIBIT 12
116 of 383

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 October 29 25 Irvine
Pat Somerville, PE
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 290, Irvine, CA 92602
(949) 477-9000 | [email protected]
EXHIBIT 12
117 of 383

24 CITY OF GLENDALE

QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
N/A
EXHIBIT 13
118 of 383

25 CITY OF GLENDALE

QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

26 CITY OF GLENDALE

QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

111

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
0 Riverside
P: 951.248.4279 | [email protected]
Brian Knoll
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506
November 3 25
EXHIBIT 13
120 of 383

26 RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Matthew Lysne Board of Directors 234 N. El Molino Ave Pasadena CA 91101 Rachel Adams / Architecture for
Education
Board of Directors 41 N. Fair Oaks Ave Pasadena CA 91103 John Olivier/Fuscoe Board of Directors 15535 Sand Canyon Ave, Suite 1000 Irvine CA 92618 Stephen Carroll
Scott Horsley
Daniel Hoon
101 N. Indian Hill Blvd, C2-200
101 N. Indian Hill Blvd, C2-200
14988 Sand Canyon Ave, Studio 8
Claremont
Claremont
Irvine
CA
CA
CA
91711
91711
92618
EPTDESIGN 234 N. El Molino Avenue, Suite 100, Pasadena, CA 91101 EXHIBIT 14
121 of 383

27 RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

N/A
X
EXHIBIT 14
122 of 383

28 RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

111

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 October 20 25 Pasadena
Matthew Lysne
234 N. El Molino Avenue, Suite 100, Pasadena, CA 91101
(626) 795-2008 / [email protected]
EXHIBIT 14
123 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Craig Crowley
Matthew Hubbard
Mark Aden
Jeff Brink
Roger Heeringa 1700 7th Street, Suite 1700 Seattle WA 98101 CA 94105135 Main Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco
523 W 6th Street, Suite 616 Los Angeles CA 90014
1060 Fowler Avenue, Suite 202 Bozeman MT 59718
707 W 2nd Avenue Spokane WA 99201
EXHIBIT 15
124 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
1 October 27 Los Angeles25
Mark Aden
523 W 6th Street, Suite 616 Los Angeles, CA 90014
[email protected]
EXHIBIT 15
126 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
John A. Martin & Associates, Inc.

Kal Benuska, SE
Kurt Clandening, SE
Katie Rosen, MBA
N/A
950 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400
950 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400
950 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Los Angeles
Los Angeles
CA
CA
90015
90015
1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1570 Oakland CA 94612
Shane Fitzgerald, SE, DBIA 950 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Los Angeles CA 90015 RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Kim Pacheco, SE 2505 2nd Avenue, Suite 520 Seattle WA 98121 John Nissen, SE 950 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Los Angeles CA 90015 Matt Timmers, SE 950 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Los Angeles CA 90015 EXHIBIT 16
127 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 16
129 of 383

37 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CIP ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOVEMBER 3, 2025
RF
Q No.

PWA
2025
-00
3 109

D. DISCLOSURE
- CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
– CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance ”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A
contractor
* (including a subcontractor
**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to appro val by the
City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Tre asurer;
and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a co ntractor or
subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor

whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is
known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible b idder.

To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requ ires City staff
to prepare this report which discloses certain information about the
contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

Information that must be disclosed:

● Name of the
person, entity, or organization
(i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor)

●
Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
●
Chief Operating Officer
●
Chief Financial Officer
●
Chairperson
●
All members of the Board of Directors
●
All persons who own more than 10% of the
person, entity, or organization
●
Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization
Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name

Address

Full Name

Title

Business Address

City

State

Zip

Chairperson

Chief Executive Officer / President

Chief Operating Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Board of Directors

Budlong & Associates, inc.
700 N. Central Ave. #520 Glendale, CA 91203
Sunil Patel
Glendale
CA
91203
700 N. Central Ave. #520
Felix Gomez
700 N. Central Ave. #520
Glendale
CA
91203
Debbie Ludwig
700 N. Central Ave. #520
Glendale
CA
91203

8. Qualifications Forms
EXHIBIT 17
130 of 383

38 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CIP ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOVEMBER 3, 2025
RF
Q No.

PWA
2025
-00
3 110

More than 10% interest owner

*“Contractor”
is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA.

In
addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s
Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an
ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization
, and any campaign commit
tee that is owned
or controlled by that
person, entity, or organization
. Please disclose these persons’
names
and business
addresses
.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name

Address

Full Name

Title

Business Address

City

State

Zip

Chairperson

Chief Executive Officer / President

Chief Operating Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Board of Directors

More than 10% interest owner

**
“Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a porti on of the work
undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usuall y by a general or prime
contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or
organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please d isclose these
persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title

Business Address

City

State

Zip

CERTIFICATION

On behalf of the above
-named
Contractor
Subcontractor:

•
I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ―
or if I select
additional
―
architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and

8. Qualifications Forms
EXHIBIT 17
131 of 383

39 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) ON-CALL SERVICES FOR FACILITIES CIP ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOVEMBER 3, 2025
RF
Q No.

PWA
2025
-00
3 111

•
I hereby certify that:▪
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ▪
The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete;and ▪
I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is

pages.

Executed on:

, 20

, at:

, California.

Signature:

Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number
: E-mail
Address:

3 October 30
25 Glendale
Sunil Patel
700 N. Central Ave. #520 Glendale, CA 91203
C: 909-215-3969 / E: [email protected]
None

8. Qualifications Forms
EXHIBIT 17
132 of 383

BUREAU VERITAS 600 N. Rosemead Blvd #205 | Pasadena, CA 91107 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com
29 EXHIBIT 18 - QUALIFICATION FORMS
RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Renato Catrib
Gus Guerrero
Hilarie Fournier
N/A
N/A
16800 Greenspoint Park Dr suite 300 s
16800 Greenspoint Park Dr suite 300 s
16800 Greenspoint Park Dr suite 300 s
Houston
Houston
Houston
77060
77060
77060
TX
TX
TX
EXHIBIT 18
133 of 383

BUREAU VERITAS 600 N. Rosemead Blvd #205 | Pasadena, CA 91107 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com
30 EXHIBIT 18 - QUALIFICATION FORMS
RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**: Bureau Veritas will provide our services 100%.

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

BUREAU VERITAS 600 N. Rosemead Blvd #205 | Pasadena, CA 91107 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com
31 EXHIBIT 18 - QUALIFICATION FORMS
RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
111
• I hereby certify that:
▪ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ▪ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and
▪ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Craig Baptista
P: 916-514-4516 | E: [email protected]
3 October 24 25 Pasadena
600 N Rosemead Blvd #205, Pasadena, CA 91107
EXHIBIT 18
135 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Cumming Management Group, Inc. 350 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Gavin Middleton
Anas Al Jajeh
Derek Hutchison
Anas Al Jajeh
N/A
276 Post Road West, 2nd Floor Westport CT 06880
900 3rd Avenue, 6th Floor New York NY 10022
276 Post Road West, 2nd Floor Westport CT 06880
276 Post Road West, 2nd Floor Westport CT 06880
cumming-group.com 31 City of Glendale RFQ #PWA 2025-003 EXHIBIT 19
136 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Anthony Sanchez
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1900, Los Angeles, CA 90071 (323) 855-4710 / [email protected]
October 22 25 Los Angeles
3 EXHIBIT 19
138 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Citadel CPM, Inc. 482 S. Arroyo Parkway, Suite 230, Pasadena, California 91105 Fadi R. Rassam 482 S. Arroyo Parkway, Suite 230 Pasadena CA 91105 EXHIBIT 20
139 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 November 3 2025
Fadi R. Rassam
482 S. Arroyo Parkway, Suite 230, Pasadena, California 91105 626.796.7926 [email protected]
EXHIBIT 20
141 of 383

RFP No. PWA 2025-001

74 D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS

The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contra ctor must also disclose the name(s) of that pe rson’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or cont rolled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclo se these persons’ name and business address.

EXHIBIT 21
142 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
109
D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Z&K Consultants, Inc. 17130 Van Buren Blvd, Suite 122, Riverside, CA 92504 17130 Van Buren Blvd, Suite 122 Riverside CA 92504 17130 Van Buren Blvd, Suite 122 Riverside CA 92504 Crystal Fraire
Zack Faqih
EXHIBIT 22
143 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003
110
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

X
EXHIBIT 22
144 of 383

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 November 3 25 Riverside
[email protected]
17130 Van Buren Blvd, Suite 122, Riverside, CA, 92504
Crystal Fraire
EXHIBIT 22
145 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

109

D. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND

SUBCONTRACTORS

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Michael Darquea
25350 Magic Mountain Pkwy., Suite 300
Valencia
CA
91355

CLMI GROUP, LLC
25350 Magic Mountain Pkwy., Suite 300, Valencia, CA 91355 EXHIBIT 23
146 of 383

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

110

More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person wi th an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign commit tee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ names and business addresses.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

RFQ No. PWA 2025-003

111

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
25350 Magic Mountain Pkwy., Suite 300, Valencia, CA 91355 Michael Darquea
November 3
25 Valencia
213.248.1531 [email protected]
EXHIBIT 23
148 of 383

9a
26-89789

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Updated Montrose Comprehensive Parking Analysis

1. Motion to Approve the Recommended Parking Management Strategies Outlined in the Comprehensive Parking Analysis.

2. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Sections 10.40.110 and 10.40.120 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, Relating to Parking Meters, and Fixing the Parking Meter Rates for Certain Zones.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for April 21, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff engaged Transpo Group USA Inc. (Transpo) to conduct the 2019 Montrose parking study, leading to strategic recommendations to modernize enforcement, update rates and hours, and improve customer access. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted parking patterns and delayed full implementation of these strategies. In 2024, staff again partnered with Transpo to update the study using comparable data-collection methods. While overall occupancy has declined, high-demand areas persist along Honolulu Avenue and in several City-owned lots, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to balance customer access with employee parking demand.

The updated study recommends directing employee parking to designated off-street lots, increasing rates along Honolulu Avenue to preserve short-term customer spaces, and expanding paid parking to Wickham Way and Broadview Drive, as well as implementing paid parking in City-owned lots at a lower rate than on-street parking to improve turnover, enhance customer access, and establish a financially sustainable program. Stakeholder engagement with the Montrose Shopping Park Association and the Transportation and Parking Commission resulted in unanimous support for these strategies.
149 of 383

9a2
26-89789
6 7
2 1

RECOMMENDATION
Pass a motion regarding the recommended parking management strategies outlined in the report, including an option for paid off-street parking, and introduce the ordinance.

ANALYSIS
On May 5, 2018, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Transpo for parking consulting services, following a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process. The firm was retained to develop comprehensive parking management strategies for Downtown Glendale and the Montrose Shopping Park District.

On November 5, 2019, Transpo presented the Downtown Glendale and Montrose Parking Analysis to the City Council. This in-depth study led to the adoption of several strategic recommendations, including a key proposal to modernize the Montrose Employee Parking Program. Originally implemented in 2004, the program had become outdated and no longer effectively met the needs of local employees.

Following the 2019 parking study, the City implemented several key management strategies to improve efficiency and customer access. In Montrose specifically, parking enforcement was modernized with license plate recognition technology and upgraded handheld devices, enabling faster compliance checks. Parking rates along Honolulu Avenue and adjacent streets were increased to $1.50 per hour and paid parking hours were extended to 10 a.m.– 8 p.m. to capture peak evening activity. Time limits were adjusted on Wickham Way to balance short- and long-term needs; and wayfinding signage was standardized to align with citywide branding. In addition, mobile payments were introduced through PayByPhone, offering residents and visitors a convenient digital option. These measures have collectively modernized enforcement, improved turnover, and enhanced customer experience. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted parking patterns and delayed further implementation of key strategies in Montrose. As parking behaviors have shifted in the post-pandemic period, an updated parking study was warranted.

On April 30, 2024, the City Council awarded a new professional services agreement to Transpo Group USA Inc., the same firm that developed the 2019 study. Transpo’s prior experience, familiarity with the area, and established relationships with key stakeholders, along with its strong foundation in public engagement, positioned the firm well to lead this update.

Updated parking data was collected in October and November 2024, consistent with the timeframe and methodology used in 2019. This approach ensured relevant, comparable results and minimized potential discrepancies. Data collected in 2024 shows that overall occupancy levels have decreased compared to 2019; however, localized hot spots persist along Honolulu Avenue and in Montrose Lots 2, 4, 6, and 7, where occupancy regularly exceeds 85%. On-street spaces generally support short-term turnover, with most vehicles staying under three hours, while off-street lots (particularly Lots 4 and 7) show significant long-term use beyond posted limits, suggesting employee 150 of 383

9a3
26-89789
6 7
2 1
parking. This imbalance highlights the need for targeted strategies to preserve customer access while accommodating employee demand.

The study recommends restructuring employee parking by directing it to select off-street lots rather than allowing use of all City-owned parking facilities. Concentrating employee parking in designated locations would better distribute demand, reduce peak congestion in heavily used lots, and preserve more convenient spaces for customers. To further protect high-turnover areas, the report recommends increasing the hourly parking rate along Honolulu Avenue, where occupancy regularly exceeds 85 percent, helping ensure these prime spaces remain available for short-term customer use. In addition, expanding paid parking to portions of Wickham Way and Broadview Drive would help direct employees into designated lots while leaving on-street spaces in front of businesses available for patrons. Together, these measures aim to balance customer access with employee parking needs while supporting the vitality of Montrose’s commercial district.

The study also emphasizes that the parking program should be financially self- sustaining. While the program currently generates revenue, it does not fully cover the costs of operating and maintaining the parking management system. Additional revenue will be needed to support ongoing parking management and future capital improvements. To address this gap, the study evaluated several options for achieving financial sustainability and ultimately recommends implementing paid parking in City- owned parking lots. This approach is consistent with the 2019 parking analysis which was not implemented at that time. Under this recommendation, customers would pay an hourly rate in off-street lots that is lower than the rate on Honolulu Avenue, creating a new revenue stream through parking meters. This strategy would help free up prime on- street and off-street spaces for short-term customer use while generating predictable funding for the parking management program and future capital improvements.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Stakeholder input is essential to determining the most effective strategies to support Montrose’s long-term parking management goals, and continued feedback is encouraged. In May 2025, Transpo presented its initial findings to the Montrose Shopping Park Association (MSPA) and local business stakeholders. Their input and ongoing collaboration were instrumental in refining strategies tailored to Montrose’s unique needs, and in December 2025, presented revised findings that incorporated feedback received on the initial recommendations.

In February 2026, the Transportation and Parking Commission (TPC) also reviewed the report and provided input. Ultimately, both the MSPA and the TPC expressed unanimous support for the parking management strategies outlined in the updated parking analysis including an option for paid off-street parking.

In March 2026, flyers were distributed to businesses within the Montrose Shopping Park area summarizing the study’s findings and inviting additional feedback. 151 of 383

9a4
26-89789
6 7
2 1

FISCAL IMPACT
Implementation of the recommended parking management strategies will cost approximately $50,000 for new parking meters and signs, which was included as a part of the FY 2025-26 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council-approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$50,000 GL: 43110-4010-PWD-0020
PL: PWD01474AN
Capital Improvement Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Public Works Projects
Staff anticipate additional General Fund revenues of approximately $75,000 annually related to the rate increase and expanded on-street parking meters. Once paid parking is introduced in City-owned parking lots, annual General Fund revenues are projected to increase by approximately $300,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The activity under consideration is categorically exempt as a Class 1 project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301, which consists, among other things, of the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, including existing highways and streets, sidewalks, and similar facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Moreover, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; thus, it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not pass the motion or introduce the ordinance.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Tad Dombroski, Parking Manager
152 of 383

9a5
26-89789
6 7
2 1
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A: Montrose Parking Analysis
153 of 383

1 6
8 7
6 MOTION
Moved by Council Member __________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________, that, with respect to the report of the Director of Public Works dated April 21, 2026, the Council of the City of Glendale hereby approves of, and directs staff to implement, the following parking management strategies outlined in the Comprehensive Parking Analysis in the Montrose core districts: increase the on-street hourly parking rate on Honolulu Avenue; expand paid parking to portions of Wickham Way and Broadview Drive; and implement paid parking in City-owned parking lots.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:
154 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 ORDINANCE NO. _______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.40.110 AND 10.40.120 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, RELATING TO PARKING METERS, AND FIXING THE PARKING METER RATES FOR CERTAIN ZONES.

WHEREAS, section 10.40.010 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, provides in pertinent part that the City Council shall, by ordinance, establish parking meter zones, including therein such streets, portions of streets or city-owned or leased property as parking conditions require; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined that parking conditions require the regulation of the parking of vehicles with the aid of parking meters, and established parking meter zones upon parcels of land and on portions of streets described in sections 10.40.110 and 10.40.120 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, respectively; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 10.40.110 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, parking meter zones are established on the parcels of land known as Montrose Lots 1 through 7; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 10.40.120 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, parking meter zones are established on Honolulu Avenue from Montrose Avenue to Las Palmas Avenue, Market Street from Honolulu Avenue to Broadview Drive, Montrose Avenue from Honolulu Avenue to boundary of city of Glendale, Ocean View Boulevard from Broadview Drive north to boundary of city of Glendale, Verdugo Road from Honolulu Avenue to Broadview Drive, and Wickham Way from Broadview Drive to Florencia Drive; and
WHEREAS, the report of the Director of Public Works dated April 21, 2026, recommends that the City Council approve the parking management strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Parking Analysis, attached thereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, in turn, the Comprehensive Parking Analysis recommends, in pertinent part, establishing a parking meter zone on Broadview Drive and fixing the rate of fees for the parking meter zones on parcels of land in Montrose below the rate of fees for the parking meter zones on streets in Montrose; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that parking conditions in Montrose require the regulation of the parking of vehicles with the aid of parking meters on Broadview Drive from Ocean View Boulevard to Market Street; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that, to improve turnover, enhance customer access, and establish a financially sustainable program, the rate of 155 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 fees for the parking meter zones on parcels of land in Montrose shall be fixed below the rate of fees for the parking meter zones on streets in Montrose as prescribed herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Section 10.40.110 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is hereby amended to read as follows:

10.40.110 Parking meter zones on parcels of land—Established.

It is determined that parking conditions require the regulation of the parking of vehicles with the aid of parking meters, and parking meter zones are established upon the following parcels of land in the city.

Zone 1. City-owned land being a strip of land having a uniform width of 57 feet extending from Colorado Street to Harvard Street lying immediately easterly of and contiguous to the easterly line of the first alley easterly of Brand Boulevard, known as Central Park Lot.

Zone 2. City-owned and leased land, being Lots 3 through 6 inclusive. W. S. Knott Tract, as per map recorded in book 7, page 32 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Maryland Avenue Lot 1.

Zone 3. City-owned land being Lots 37 and 38. Block 2, Moore's Resubdivision of a portion of Block 9, Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 9, page 135 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Salem Street Lot.

Zone 4. City-owned land being Lots 33, 34 and the northeasterly six feet (measured at right angles to the northeasterly line) of Lot 35, Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder known as Montrose Lot 1.

Zone 5. City-owned land being the west 66 feet of Lots 14 and 39, Grider and Hamilton's Lomita Park, as per map recorded in book 6, page 105 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Armory Lot.

Zone 6. City-owned land being Lots 31 through 35 inclusive, Glendalia Park Tract, as per map recorded in book 10, page 157 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Orange Street Lot 1.

Zone 7. City-owned land being Lots 11 through 14 inclusive, Tract No. 1736, as per map recorded in book 20, page 153 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Hawthorne Street Lot.

Zone 8. City-owned land being Lot 24, in Block 63, Campbell and Thompson's Tract, as per map recorded in book 9, page 56 of Maps in the office of the county recorder, known as Orange Street Lot 2.
156 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 Zone 9. City-owned and leased land being Lots 15 through 18 inclusive, Block 4 Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 5, page 16 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Maryland Avenue Lot 2.

Zone 10. City-owned land being Lots 66 through 72 inclusive, Glendalia Park Tract, as per map recorded in book 10, page 157 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Maryland Avenue Lot 3.

Zone 11. City-owned land being Lots 5, 7 and 9, Block 11, Town of Glendale Tract, as per map recorded in book 14, page 95 of Miscellaneous Records in the office of the county recorder, known as Glendale Avenue Lot.

Zone 12. City-owned land being Lot 19, Block 63, Campbell and Thompson Tract, as per map recorded in book 9, page 56, in the office of the county recorder, known as Orange Street Lot 3.

Zone 13. City-leased land being portions of Lots 1 through 5 inclusive, Block 5, Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 5, page 167 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Maryland Avenue Lot 4.

Zone 14. City-owned and leased land being Lots 61 through 63 inclusive, of the Glendalia Park Tract, as per map recorded in book 10, page 157 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as 303 North Maryland Avenue Parking Lot.

Zone 15. City-owned and leased land being Lots 16 and 17 of the C. F. Compton Tract, as per map recorded in book 6, page 168 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as 128 South Orange Street Parking Lot.

Zone 16. City-owned land being Lot 15 of the Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 5, page 167 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as 208 North Orange Street Parking Lot.

Zone 17. City-owned land being Lots 21 through 23 inclusive, of the Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 5, page 167 of Maps in the office of the county recorder, known as 236 North Orange Street Parking Lot.

Zone 18. City-owned land being Lots 9 and 10, and portions of Lots 11 and 12, Block 5, Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 5, page 167 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as 201 North Maryland Avenue Parking Lot.

Zone 19. City-owned land being Lot 19 of Block 5, Glendale Boulevard Tract, as per map recorded in book 5, page 167 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as 226 North Orange Street Parking Lot.

Zone 20. City-owned land being Lots 1 through 16 inclusive, Tract No. 11012 as per map recorded in book 192, pages 35 and 36 of Maps in the office of the county recorder including the adjacent alley, known as Lot No. 31; and city-owned land being a portion of the Teodoro and Catalina Verdugo 2629.01 acre allotment of the Rancho San Rafael, District Court Case No. 1621 and a portion of the Catalina Verdugo 36.10 acre allotment, District Court Case No. 1621, known as Lot No. 30.

Zone 21. City-owned land being Lot 305, excepting: the southwesterly 15 feet, the northeasterly seven and one half (7.5) feet of the northwesterly 50 feet, the 157 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 northeasterly twelve and one half (12.5) feet of the southeasterly 50 feet, and that portion of Lot 305 accepted into the City Street System thereof; Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Montrose Lot 2.

Zone 22. City-owned land being Lots 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, and 295, Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Montrose Lot 3.

Zone 23. City-owned land being the southeasterly 50 feet (measured at right angles to the southeasterly line) of Lot 334 and the northwesterly 50 feet (measured at right angles to the northwesterly line) of Lot 335, Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Montrose Lot 4.

Zone 24. City-owned land being the northwesterly 25 feet (measured at right angles to the northwesterly line) of Lot 330, except the southwesterly 10 feet thereof, Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Montrose Lot 5.

Zone 25. City-owned land being the northwesterly 49 feet (measured at right angles to the northwesterly line) of Lot 337, Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder, known as Montrose Lot 6.

Zone 26. City-owned land being Lots 41 and 42, Tract No. 1701, as per map recorded in book 22, pages 178, 179 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder; and city-owned land being Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, Block 6, Sparr Heights Tract, as per map recorded in book 59, pages 34, 35 and 36 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder including the adjacent alley 291, known as Montrose Lot No. 7.

SECTION 3. Section 10.40.120 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is hereby amended to read as follows:

10.40.120 Parking meter zones on streets—Established.

It is hereby determined that parking conditions require the regulation of the parking of vehicles with the aid of parking meters. Parking meter zones are hereby established upon the following portions of street in said city.

Zone (a) Brand Boulevard. Colorado Street to Doran Street.

Zone (b) Broadway. Central Avenue to first alley east of Maryland Avenue from such alley east to Everett Street.

Zone (c) California Avenue, Orange Street to Maryland Avenue.

Zone (d) Central Avenue, Broadway to Lexington Drive.

Zone (e) Deleted.

Zone (f) Glendale Avenue. Harvard Street to Broadway; Broadway to Wilson Avenue. 158 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 Zone (g) Harvard Street. Brand Boulevard to first alley east of Maryland Avenue; from said alley to Louise Street.

Zone (h) Broadview Drive. Ocean View Boulevard to Market Street.

Zone (i) Honolulu Avenue. Montrose Avenue to Las Palmas Avenue.

Zone (j) Lexington Drive. Central Avenue to Orange Street, and Brand Boulevard to Maryland Avenue.

Zone (k) Louise Street. Broadway to Colorado Street.

Zone (l) Market Street. Honolulu Avenue to Broadview Drive.

Zone (m) Maryland Avenue. Harvard Street to Maryland Place.

Zone (n) Montrose Avenue. Honolulu Avenue to boundary of city of Glendale.

Zone (o) Ocean View Boulevard. Broadview Drive north to boundary of city of Glendale.

Zone (p) Orange Street. Lot 23 Alley of Tract Map No. 68602 north of the Americana at Brand to Doran Street.

Zone (q) Wilson Avenue. Central Avenue to first alley east of Maryland Avenue; from said alley east to Louise Street.

Zone (r) Verdugo Road. Honolulu Avenue to Broadview Drive.

Zone (s) Milford Street. Orange Street to Maryland Avenue.

Zone (t) Towne Avenue. Verdugo Road to Canada Boulevard.

Zone (u) Verdugo Road. Towne Avenue to Canada Boulevard; east side of said street from Calle Vaquero to Glendale Avenue.

Zone (v) Canada Boulevard. Verdugo Road to Colina Drive.

Zone (w) Mountain Street. Verdugo Road to Verdugo Wash.

Zone (x) Isabel Street. Broadway to Wilson, west side of said street; east side of said street.

Zone (y) Wickham Way. Broadview Drive to Florencita Drive.

SECTION 4. It is hereby determined that the rate of fees for the parking meter zones on parcels of land identified as Zones 4, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, which are described in Section 2 hereof, shall be one dollar ($1.00) hourly between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday.

SECTION 5. It is hereby determined that the rate of fees for the parking meter zones on streets identified as Zones (h), (i), (l), (n), (o), (r), and (y), which are described in Section 3 hereof, shall be two dollars ($2.00) hourly between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday.

SECTION 6. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 in that it consists of the operation, 159 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, including existing highways and streets, sidewalks, and similar facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Moreover, the City Council finds and determines with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; thus, it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061, subdivision (b)(3).

SECTION 7. Severability. This Ordinance is adopted under the authority of the Charter of the City of Glendale and state law. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase is declared invalid or otherwise void by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any remaining provisions hereof. In this regard, the City Council finds and declares that it would have adopted this measure notwithstanding any partial invalidity hereof.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after the date of its passage.

Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of _______________, 2026.
____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
City Clerk
160 of 383

1 6
9 1
8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___________ was passed by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _____________, 2026, and that the same was passed by the followed vote.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________
City Clerk
161 of 383

MONTROSE

PARKING ANALYSIS

PREPARED BY
DECEMBER 2025
162 of 383

Prepared for the City of Glendale by
163 of 383

MONTROSEPARKING ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................1 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................... 3 PARKING REGULATIONS ......................................................................5 PARKING OCCUPANCY ..........................................................................7 PARKING DURATION OF STAY .....................................................17 KEY FINDINGS AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT .....................19 PARKING STRATEGIES ........................................................................20

EMPLOYEE PARKING PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS .........................................................23

TABLE OF CONTENTS
164 of 383

165 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 1
Parking plays a key role in supporting
the economic vitality of businesses
in Montrose and is a valuable City
resource. This analysis reviews the
parking conditions and management
strategies from the prior Montrose
Parking Analysis in 2019, evaluates
current parking conditions and
identifies implementation options
for updating the employee parking
program as an important next
step to support the management
strategies implemented since
2019. Strategies identified for
the employee parking program
are based on the reevaluation of
parking conditions since the 2019
analysis and stakeholder input.

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND
Montrose is the historic old town neighborhood
district located in the north part of Glendale,
California. The business district of Montrose
centers around its main street, Honolulu
Avenue. There are nearly 200 businesses
located within the neighborhood. These
businesses consist of many restaurants,
cafés, small retail shops, and other local
businesses that cater to locals and visitors. The
neighborhood also features Sunday Harvest
Market, and regular events and family-friendly
nightlife. The business district is surrounded
by residential land use, which is mostly single-
family and low-density multi-family buildings.

The business district also borders the La
Crescenta-Montrose unincorporated area
under Los Angeles County jurisdiction.

Residents and employees of businesses
in the County area have been observed
parking within the Montrose business
district, utilizing some of the available
public parking. This presents additional
challenges regarding parking policies,
management strategies, and enforcement.
166 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 20252
Prepared by
The Glendale City Council approved the
2019 study report and its recommended
parking management strategies in November
2019. The following list describes each
of the recommended strategies and
implementation steps the City has taken
since the 2019 study report was approved.
9 Evaluate and Integrate Technology.

The City has equipped the parking
enforcement team with state-of-the-art
license plate recognition (LPR) technology
and upgraded handheld devices to
more efficiently enforce both time limit
restrictions and on-street paid parking.

With this technology, enforcement staff
can quickly check each parked vehicle to
verify payment and/or parking duration
to comply with parking restrictions.

This technology can also be adapted
to help enforce digital permit systems
that could be implemented in the future.

Implemented January/February 2020
9 Increase Parking Prices Along
Honolulu Avenue. The City increased
the hourly parking charge on Honolulu
Avenue to $1.50 per hour to better
reflect the high parking demand
observed for these convenient on-
street spaces. The City also extended
this price increase to the side streets in
Montrose with on-street paid parking.

Implemented January/February 2020
9 Extend or Change Paid Parking Hours.

The City adjusted the hours for on-street
paid parking in Montrose to 10 a.m. to 8
p.m. to better reflect the hours of peak
demand observed in the 2019 study.

The City also made this adjustment to
the hours for all on-street and off-street
parking time limit restrictions in Montrose.

Implemented January/February 2020
9 Change Time Limits on Wickham Way
Blocks. The City adjusted the time limit
for on-street parking on Wickham Way
between Honolulu Avenue and Broadview
Drive, north of the midblock alleyway, to a
maximum of 3 hours. The City maintained
the 9-hour time limit for on-street parking
on Wickham Way south of the midblock
alleyway. Implemented October 2021
9 Develop a Consistent Brand and
Wayfinding. The City aligned the
wayfinding signage along the streets
in Montrose with the branding and
design of signs in downtown Glendale
to create a consistent citywide look
and feel. Implemented October 2021
9 Pay-By-Phone. The City has contracted
with PayByPhone to provide a mobile
app-based payment solution for residents,
employees, and visitors to pay for parking
in Montrose. Implemented April 2023
Other parking management strategies
recommended in the 2019 study report have not
yet been implemented, including an update to
the employee parking program. This 2025 study
both re-evaluates existing parking conditions in
Montrose and considers implementation options
to update the employee parking program.

PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTED SINCE THE 2019 STUDY 167 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 3
Like the 2019 study, the 2025 study area
focuses on the Montrose business district
or the Montrose Shopping Park. This was
identified as the area where the highest parking
demand occurs and where management
strategies are identified to support the future
success of the Montrose commercial area.

The map on the following page illustrates the
publicly available on- and off-street parking
within the study area, which is bounded by
Florencita Drive, Broadview Drive, Las Palmas
Avenue and Verdugo Road/Montrose Avenue.

The 2025 study area includes the Glendale
Community College PDC off-street parking
lots. The college is currently implementing
redevelopment plans and, due to a pause
in onsite activity, has opened these lots to
be used as de facto public parking. In total,
the 2025 study area includes 221 on-street
spaces and 660 off-street spaces for a total
of 881 parking spaces. However, with the
planned redevelopment of the college, it is
anticipated that the 92 parking spaces in the
college lots will no longer be available for use
as public parking. The parking management
strategies recommended in this report assume

STUDY AREA
that the public parking demand observed
in the college lots for this study will need
to be accommodated in the other publicly
available off-street parking lots in Montrose.

The off-street parking occupancies shown
in this report reflect this assumed shift in
parking demand from the college lots.

With the planned
redevelopment of the
college, it is anticipated
that the 92 parking spaces
in the college lots will no
longer be available for
use as public parking.
168 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 20254
Prepared by

VERDUGO RD
O
CEAN
VIEW
BL
VD

MIRA VISTA AVE

WICKHAM WY

WALTONIA DR
GL
ENAD
A
AVE
CLIFT
O
N
PL

BROADVIEW DR

VERDUGO BLVD

THOMPSON CT

HONOLULU AVE

MARKET ST
LAS
PALMAS
AVE

VALVERDE PL
M
O
N
TRO
SE
AVE

ORANGEDALE AVE

DOWNING AVE

FLORENCITA DRIVE

BUENAVISTA AVE

ROSEMARY AVE
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 4
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 3
Lot 5
Glendale
College
Lots
0 400200
Feet
M:\23\1.23406.00 - Montrose Parking Analysis\GIS\ArcGISPro\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024.aprx FIGURE
XX
LEGEND
Off-Street Lots
On-Street Spaces
Study Area Boundary
Study Area
Montrose Parking Analysis
DRAFT
Total Spaces
Counted
881
Off-Street
Spaces Counted
660
On-Street
Spaces Counted
221
169 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 5
The map on the following page illustrates
the location of paid parking and unrestricted
parking and the time limits that are provided
for parking. The only paid parking in the study
area is on-street located along Honolulu
Avenue and on the blocks immediately north
and south of this street. All the parking lots
have free parking with time limits varying
between 3 and 9 hours. The on-street parking
has mostly 2-hour time limits with some short-
term parking that has 30-minute and 1-hour

PARKING REGULATIONS
time limits. The only exception to these
time limits on-street is along Wickham Way
between Honolulu Avenue and Broadview
Drive where the time limits are 3 hours north
of the midblock alleyway and 9 hours south
of the midblock alleyway. Parking restrictions
are between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday
through Saturday for the on-street parking
and between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m. for the off-
street parking Monday through Sunday.

All the parking lots
have free parking with
time limits varying
between 3 and 9 hours.
170 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 20256
Prepared by

VERDUGO RD

MIRA VISTA AVE

WICKHAM WY

WALTONIA DR
GLENAD
A
AVE
CLI
FTO
N
PL

BROADVIEW DR

VERDUGO BLVD

THOMPSON CT

HONOLULU AVE

MARKET ST
LAS
PALMAS
AVE
O
CE
AN
VIEW
BLVD

VALVERDE PL
M
O
N
TRO
SE
AVE

ORANGEDALE AVE

DOWNING AVE

FLORENCITA DRIVE

BUENAVISTA AVE

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 7
Existing parking conditions were documented
through data collection and coordination
with the City in October of 2024. The data
collection captured parking supply (described
previously), occupancy, and duration (or
length of stay). Data were collected both
for on-street and off-street parking lots.

Data related to parking occupancy and
duration were collected on Thursday, October
17 and Saturday, October 19 to capture typical
fall weekday and weekend conditions. This
data collection was then validated through
frequent spot checks of parking facilities by
City staff and the project team throughout the
Fall season of 2024. Hourly occupancy along
each on-street block and within each lot were
collected from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Duration of
stay data were also collected during the same
time period. The data collection provided an
understanding of how utilized or occupied
publicly available parking is in Montrose and
how long vehicles park. The occupancy and
duration characteristics provide valuable
information to develop data driven parking
management strategies for Montrose.

On-street parking occupancy between
70 and 85 percent typically indicates 1
to 2 available parking spaces per block
making it easier for drivers to find parking.

Parking occupancies over 85 percent on-
street and in larger parking lots typically
indicate congested parking conditions
where drivers have difficulty finding parking
and may have to circulate the area more
than once to find an available space.

A review of the hourly occupancy shows that
peaking conditions occur at 12 and 7 p.m.
on weekdays. The highest peak occurs at 7
p.m. with 65 percent of the parking spaces
occupied, as compared to the 2019 study when
the highest peak occurred at 6 p.m. with 78
percent of the parking spaces occupied. This
indicates that peak evening conditions are
likely driven by restaurant and retail activity.

The peak parking occupancy on Saturday
occurs at 3 p.m with 50 percent of parking
spaces occupied, as compared to the 2019
study when the highest peak occurred at
1 p.m. with 86 percent of parking spaces
occupied. For the 2025 study, peak parking
occupancy is 15 percentage points lower on
Saturday compared to the weekday condition.

The total parking occupancy for the study
area is below 85 percent during both weekday
and Saturday conditions. However, there
are certain areas where occupancy exceeds
this target and management strategies
could better balance parking needs. The
following pages provide more detail on
findings related to on- and off-street parking
as well as paid and unpaid parking.

PARKING OCCUPANCY
172 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 20258
Prepared by
173 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 9

TOTAL ON-STREET OCCUPANCY (PAID AND UNPAID)
The top chart illustrates the WEEKDAY
HOURLY OCCUPANCY ON-STREET with the
peak occurring at 7 p.m. with 66 percent of
the spaces occupied. As mentioned, parking
regulations were extended from 6 p.m. to 8
p.m. to include this peak occupancy period.

The bottom chart provides the SATURDAY
HOURLY OCCUPANCY ON-STREET and shows
that the peak parking occupancy also occurs at
7 p.m. with 65 percent of the spaces occupied.

Like the weekday, parking regulations were
extended from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. to include this
peak occupancy period. Saturday occupancy is
generally lower than weekday conditions except
during the early morning and late evening.

On-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
221 145
On-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
221 144
174 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202510
Prepared by

TOTAL OFF-STREET OCCUPANCY
The top chart illustrates the WEEKDAY

HOURLY OCCUPANCY OFF-STREET
with the peak occurring at 7 p.m. with
65 percent of the spaces occupied.

The bottom chart provides the SATURDAY

HOURLY OCCUPANCY OFF-STREET
with the peak parking occupancy occurring
at 3 p.m. with 46 percent of the spaces
occupied. Consistent with the overall study
area, Saturday occupancy is generally
lower than weekday conditions.

Off-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
568 370
Off-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
568 259
175 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 11

ON-STREET PAID OCCUPANCY
The bottom chart provides the SATURDAY

HOURLY OCCUPANCY FOR ON-STREET
PAID PARKING and shows that the peak
parking occupancy also occurs at 3 p.m.
with 66 percent of the spaces occupied.

Unlike the overall study area, Saturday
occupancy for on-street paid parking is
generally higher than weekday conditions.

The top chart illustrates the WEEKDAY

HOURLY OCCUPANCY FOR ON-STREET
PAID PARKING and shows that the peak
occurs at 7 p.m. with 62 percent of the spaces
occupied. As mentioned, the paid parking
hours were extended from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
to include this peak occupancy period.

On-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
149 92
On-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
149 98
176 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202512
Prepared by

ON-STREET UNPAID OCCUPANCY
The WEEKDAY HOURLY OCCUPANCY

FOR ON-STREET UNPAID PARKING
shows that the peak occurs at 6 p.m. with
75 percent of the spaces occupied.

The SATURDAY HOURLY OCCUPANCY FOR
ON-STREET UNPAID PARKING shows that
the peak occurs at 6 p.m. with 74 percent of
the spaces occupied. Weekday occupancy
for on-street unpaid parking is generally
higher than Saturday conditions. On-street
parking is often the most desirable parking
for short term retail and commercial uses
as reflected in the high occupancy rates.

Off-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
72 54
Off-Street
Spaces Counted
Vehicles Parked
at Peak Hour
72 53
177 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 13

VERDUGO RD
O
CEAN
VIEW
BL
VD

MIRA VISTA AVE

WICKHAM WY

WALTONIA DR
GL
ENAD
A
AVE
CLIFT
O
N
PL

BROADVIEW DR

VERDUGO BLVD

THOMPSON CT

HONOLULU AVE

MARKET ST
LAS
PALMAS
AVE

VALVERDE PL
M
O
N
TRO
SE
AVE

ORANGEDALE AVE

DOWNING AVE

FLORENCITA DRIVE

BUENAVISTA AVE

ROSEMARY AVE
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 4
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 3
Lot 5
Glendale
College
Lots
0 400200
Feet
M:\23\1.23406.00 - Montrose Parking Analysis\GIS\ArcGISPro\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024.aprx FIGURE
XX
LEGEND
Peak Hour
Occupancy
0-70%
70-85%
>85%
Paid Parking Areas
Study Area Boundary
Weekday Peak Hour Occupancy (7 PM)
Montrose Parking Analysis
DRAFT
The peak hour (7 p.m.) on- and off-street parking
occupancy for the weekday conditions is illustrated
on this map. On-street parking occupancy is
highest along the main street, Honolulu Avenue,
and along Broadview Drive, where on-street
parking is currently unpaid. Off-street parking
occupancy is highest in lots 1, 2, and 7.

WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR OCCUPANCY (7PM)
178 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202514
Prepared by
SATURDAY PEAK HOUR OCCUPANCY (3PM)

VERDUGO RD
O
CEAN
VIEW
BL
VD

MIRA VISTA AVE

WICKHAM WY

WALTONIA DR
GL
ENAD
A
AVE
CLIFT
O
N
PL

BROADVIEW DR

VERDUGO BLVD

THOMPSON CT

HONOLULU AVE

MARKET ST
LAS
PALMAS
AVE

VALVERDE PL
M
O
N
TRO
SE
AVE

ORANGEDALE AVE

DOWNING AVE

FLORENCITA DRIVE

BUENAVISTA AVE

ROSEMARY AVE
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 4
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 3
Lot 5
Glendale
College
Lots
0 400200
Feet
M:\23\1.23406.00 - Montrose Parking Analysis\GIS\ArcGISPro\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024.aprx FIGURE
XX
LEGEND
Peak Hour
Occupancy
0-70%
70-85%
>85%
Paid Parking Areas
Study Area Boundary
Weekend Peak Hour Occupancy (3 PM)
Montrose Parking Analysis
DRAFT
This map illustrates the Saturday peak hour (3
p.m.) on- and off-street parking occupancy. Similar
to weekday conditions, the highest on-street
parking occupancies are along Honolulu Avenue
with several blocks over 85 percent. Off-street
parking occupancy is highest in lots 2 and 6.
179 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 15

VERDUGO RD
OCEAN
VIEW
BL
VD

MIRA VISTA AVE

WICKHAM WY

WALTONIA DR
GLENAD
A
AVE
CLI
FTO
N
PL

BROADVIEW DR

VERDUGO BLVD

THOMPSON CT

HONOLULU AVE

MARKET ST
LAS
PALMAS
AVE

VALVERDE PL
M
O
N
TRO
SE
AVE

ORANGEDALE AVE

DOWNING AVE

FLORENCITA DRIVE

BUENAVISTA AVE

ROSEMARY AVE
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 4
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 3
Lot 5
Glendale
College
Lots
7 10
8 4
48 10
8 9
2 2
1 2
3 2
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 1
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 7
7 2
3 0
0 0 400200
Feet
M:\23\1.23406.00 - Montrose Parking Analysis\GIS\ArcGISPro\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024.aprx FIGURE
XX
LEGEND
Hours > 85% Occupancy
0 Hours
1-3 Hours
>3 Hours
Paid Parking Areas
Study Area Boundary
Occupancy Exceeds 85% (Weekday)
Montrose Parking Analysis
DRAFT
2 9
NUMBER OF HOURS OCCUPANCY EXCEEDS 85% (WEEKDAY)
The number
of hours that the
on-street blocks and off-
street parking lots in the study
area have an occupancy greater than 85
percent on a weekday is illustrated above. One
block along Honolulu Avenue and one block along Las
Palmas Avenue in the study area have occupancies greater than 85 percent for 10 hours during the weekday. Lots 4 and 7 have occupancies greater than 85 percent for 7 hours during the weekday. 180 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202516
Prepared by
NUMBER OF HOURS OCCUPANCY EXCEEDS 85% (SATURDAY)

VERDUGO RD
O
CEAN
VIEW
BL
VD

MIRA VISTA AVE

WICKHAM WY

WALTONIA DR
GL
ENAD
A
AVE
CLIFT
O
N
PL

BROADVIEW DR

VERDUGO BLVD

THOMPSON CT

HONOLULU AVE

MARKET ST
LAS
PALMAS
AVE

VALVERDE PL
M
O
N
TRO
SE
AVE

ORANGEDALE AVE

DOWNING AVE

FLORENCITA DRIVE

BUENAVISTA AVE

ROSEMARY AVE
7 9
5 6
5 9
4 6
9 1
23 3
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 7
3 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 4
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 3
Lot 5
Glendale
College
Lots
8 8
2 0
0 0
0 0 400200
Feet
M:\23\1.23406.00 - Montrose Parking Analysis\GIS\ArcGISPro\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024\Montrose Parking Analysis 2024.aprx FIGURE
XX
LEGEND
Hours > 85% Occupancy
0 Hours
1-3 Hours
>3 Hours
Paid Parking Areas
Study Area Boundary
Occupancy Exceeds 85% (Weekend)
Montrose Parking Analysis
DRAFT
3 0
The number
of hours that the
on-street blocks and off-
street parking lots in the study
area have an occupancy greater than 85
percent on Saturday is illustrated here. Three
blocks in the study area along Honolulu Avenue have an
occupancy greater than 85 percent for over 9 hours on Saturday.

Lots 2 and 6 have occupancies greater than 85 percent for 8 hours. 181 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 17

PARKING DURATION OF STAY
Duration of stay is evaluated to identify different
types of parking users and to see if parking
spaces are being turned over to support the
specific type of parker desired. Duration of
stay data was collected for all public on-street
and off-street parking in the study area to see
if vehicles were turning over to provide short
term customer parking for nearby businesses,
complying with the posted time limit
restrictions, and to determine where employees
of nearby businesses are likely parking.

Weekday and Saturday duration of stay for
each off-street lot and for on-street parking
overall are illustrated in the following tables.

The data shows that the vast majority of
vehicles parked on-street stay for less than
3 hours, with only 6 percent of weekday on-
street vehicles and 4 percent of Saturday
on-street vehicles parked longer than 3 hours.

TURNOVER (WEEKDAY)
LOT 1

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 35 40 13 21
% of Total 32% 37% 12% 19%
LOT 5

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 17 3 4 7
% of Total 55% 10% 13% 23%
LOT 2

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 162 28 10 9
% of Total 78% 13% 5% 4%
LOT 6

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 52 10 5 23
% of Total 58% 11% 6% 26%
LOT 3

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 303 69 76 157
% of Total 50% 11% 13% 26%
LOT 7

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 154 77 40 108
% of Total 41% 20% 11% 28%
LOT 4

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 46 23 9 57
% of Total 34% 17% 7% 42%
On-Street

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 729 220 43 60
% of Total 69% 21% 4% 6%
182 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202518
Prepared by
TURNOVER (SATURDAY)However, a significant portion of off-street vehicles park longer than 3 hours, including
in lots with a 3-hour time limit restriction.

This most commonly occurs in lots 4 and 7,
where more than 30 percent of vehicles on the
weekday park for more than 3 hours. These
two parking lots are conveniently accessible to
nearby businesses both within the Montrose
Shopping Park and in neighboring jurisdictions,
suggesting that these long-term parkers could
be employees from these nearby businesses.

LOT 1

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 58 45 12 8
% of Total 47% 37% 10% 7%
LOT 5

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 19 8 6 2
% of Total 54% 23% 17% 6%
LOT 2

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 86 33 39 16
% of Total 49% 19% 22% 9%
LOT 6

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 33 14 11 25
% of Total 40% 17% 13% 30%
LOT 3

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 326 99 34 29
% of Total 67% 20% 7% 6%
LOT 7

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 133 104 54 20
% of Total 43% 33% 17% 6%
LOT 4

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 58 45 11 29
% of Total 41% 31% 8% 20%
On-Street

TIMEFRAME/HOURS
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4
# of Vehicles 684 242 78 43
% of Total 65% 23% 7% 4%
183 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 19

KEY FINDINGS AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT
࢙Montrose Shopping Park Association
board members and local business
owners observed while overall there is
parking available, specific constraints
exist in some off-street lots and on-
street segments, consistent with the
Fall 2024 data collection findings.
࢙Lot 3, which offers 9-hour parking
and is currently underutilized, is not
within convenient walking distance to
all businesses within Montrose. Some
employees feel unsafe walking long
distances to and from their vehicle in
the early morning or late at night.

Although parking occupancy in Montrose is
less than 85 percent overall, there are specific
areas where parking occupancies are exceeding
the desired threshold during both Saturday
and weekdays. Parking lots 2, 4, and 7 have
more than 4 hours on the weekday when the
parking occupancy is over 85 percent. Parking
lots 2 and 6 have 4 or more hours on Saturday
where the parking occupancy is greater than
85 percent. As noted in the Parking Duration
of Stay section, a significant portion of off-
street vehicles park longer than 3 hours and
employees of nearby businesses are likely
contributing to this long-term parking activity.
࢙Vehicles not associated with the
Montrose Shopping Park are utilizing
some of the available parking
supply, contributing to observed
parking constraints in some lots.

This includes vehicles from residents
and employees of businesses in the
County area and vehicles utilizing the
Montrose lots for park & pool/ride
activity to other employment areas.
࢙The current employee parking
program is challenging to administer
and enforce due to the use of physical
permits and the time limit restrictions
not being efficiently dynamic enough
to balance demand between more and
less desirable parking facilities. Due
to these challenges, some employees
have encountered difficulty finding
available long-term parking.

STAKEHOLDER INPUT
In discussions with key stakeholders, including Montrose Shopping Park Association board members, local business owners, and City of Glendale staff, the following input identifies key challenges for managing employee parking in Montrose. 184 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202520
Prepared by

PARKING STRATEGIES

PERFORMANCE-BASED

PARKING APPROACH
The City adopted a performance-based parking
approach where data driven triggers are used to
guide decision-making to best manage parking.

As part of the 2019 study recommendations,
the City modified its desired target range for
parking occupancy to be between 70 and 85
percent. While overall parking in Montrose
does not exceed this threshold, some off-street
lots and on-street segments do exceed this
threshold based on the Fall 2024 data collection
findings. The following sections outline
parking management strategies that could be
implemented to further balance the supply and
demand of valuable parking assets in Montrose.

Building on the parking strategies
successfully implemented since
the 2019 study, additional parking
strategies to support the following
Montrose goals and objectives
are summarized below:
࢙Support local business
needs within Montrose
࢙Provide adequate amount
of parking for customers
and employees
࢙Look to manage what
parking is available before
building more parking
Look for this icon to denote
the strategies suggested
throughout this section.
185 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 21

PRICING STRATEGIES
More available parking improves the
customer experience and economic
vitality of the neighborhood. As needed,
the City should monitor areas with paid
parking and adjust pricing. Specifically,
the adjustments should include:

ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS. It is
recommended that parking rates
continue to be evaluated on an annual basis
and adjusted using the performance-based
approach. The annual review is necessary to
address changing conditions that are
anticipated with other management strategies
and be able to react to growth and
development pressures that occur.

INCREASE PARKING PRICES ALONG
HONOLULU AVENUE. Some blocks
along Honolulu Avenue are over 85 percent
occupied for 8 or more hours. Given the
occupancy level, it is recommended to increase
the parking rate per hour by a further $0.50
(from $1.50 to $2.00 per hour) to help reduce
occupancy levels and encourage parking in
other areas where parking is available. This
rate would be consistent with the on-street
parking rate for most of downtown Glendale.

EXPAND ON-STREET PAID PARKING TO

CAPTURE WICKHAM WAY AND
BROADVIEW DRIVE BLOCKS. On-street
parking occupancy on segments of Wickham
Way between Honolulu Avenue and Broadview
Drive and on Broadview Drive adjacent to Lot 7
exceeds 85 percent occupancy for up to 9
hours. Implementing paid parking along these
blocks of Wickham Way and Broadview Drive
would help manage occupancy and increase
availability near the Montrose commercial area.

As part of this update, the City should modify
the time limit along these blocks of Wickham
Way and Broadview Drive to 2 hours consistent
with the time limit along Honolulu Avenue.

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND

MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Employees can be encouraged to utilize other
means of traveling to Montrose other than
driving alone and parking in the public parking
facilities. Strategies to consider should include
providing information on available transit
services and nearby park & pool/ride facilities,
carpooling incentives offered by employers,
and employers providing safe bike storage
areas. Employees should be informed of
available travel options through joint education
efforts from the City, the Montrose Shopping
Park Association, and their employers.

ENFORCEMENT
Enforcing parking regulations is an important
component to making sure the parking
regulations are followed. Without enforcement
many parking management strategies will be
ignored, abused, and ineffective. The City has
recently made significant improvements to its
enforcement program and can build upon these
successes to further improve enforcement.

EVALUATE AND INTEGRATE

TECHNOLOGY
Building upon the implementation of state-
of-the-art LPR technology and upgraded
handheld devices, the City should consider
other opportunities to further streamline
enforcement leveraging this technology
such as utilizing digital permits for the
employee parking program. Technology
improvements can help improve the efficiency
and accuracy of enforcement, leading to
better parking management outcomes. A
comparison of digital versus physical parking
permits is discussed further below.

PAY STATIONS WITH PAY-BY-PLATE.

The on-street paid parking in Montrose
utilizes traditional parking meters for each
individual space. Other than the recently
186 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202522
Prepared by
adopted pay-by-phone system, these parking
meters are only capable of accepting coin
payment. Upgrading the payment systems with
new technology will provide better customer
experience, be more convenient for customers,
and result in higher compliance.

As parking meters are replaced, the system
should be upgraded with pay stations that
incorporate pay-by-plate applications and
allow for credit card payment along with
mobile payment options. One pay station
serves multiple parking spaces, reducing
the amount and cost of infrastructure
and improving pedestrian mobility along
the sidewalks with impediments.

Improved payment systems can also:
࢙Provide for better customer experience
࢙Reduce labor costs by eliminating
manual payment collection, less
maintenance, and remote programming
࢙Automate the transfer of
payments to the City
࢙Integrate with enforcement technologies
such as license plate recognition
࢙Allow credit card and mobile
payment options
࢙Eliminate the need for numbered parking
spaces, which fade and require frequent
repainting, by using pay-by-plate methods

PARKING REVENUE AND FUNDING
The City should continue to review parking
finances annually to ensure the program is self-
sustaining. Currently only the administrative
and near-term maintenance costs of the
parking system are covered by revenues in
the area. More significant long-term capital
improvement projects, such as repaving the
parking lots, replacing signage, or adding
pedestrian amenities are not currently covered.

Additional funding opportunities beyond what
can be collected through the existing paid
parking system would need to be identified
to cover other improvements. This could
include potential options to expand the paid
parking system in relation to the employee
parking program, which are discussed in
the following section of this report.

BRANDING AND WAYFINDING
Branding and wayfinding signage similar
to that found in the downtown area was
added along streets in Montrose to provide a
consistent look and feel throughout Glendale
and distinguish public parking assets from
private parking. This on-street branding
and wayfinding signage could also be added
within each off-street public parking lot to
further create a consistent look and feel.

DIGITAL VS. PHYSICAL

PARKING PERMITS
The current employee parking program
utilizes physical permits in the form
of placards which employees can
hang on their rearview mirrors. These
physical permits could be replaced with
a digital permit system to help make
administering and enforcing the program
more efficient. Some of the benefits and
potential disadvantages of converting
to a digital permit system include:

Benefits:
࢙Increases efficiency
of administering and
enforcing the program.
࢙Can be integrated into the
City’s existing license plate
recognition enforcement system.
࢙Reduces production and
materials cost of distributing
physical permits.

Disadvantages:
࢙Requires upfront cost to set up
the program and software with
permit/payment system vendors.
࢙Education needed for employers
and employees to learn about and
register with the new system.
187 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 23

EMPLOYEE PARKING PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS
Implementing updates to the
employee parking program is an
important next step, building upon
the parking management policy
successes from the 2019 study.

The current employee parking
program does not adequately
address the challenges described
by stakeholder input and the on-
going off-street parking constraints
identified in this 2025 study.

Long-term parking in high demand lots,
likely due to employee parking, is preventing
customer access to these lots during peak
activity periods. The current free parking
in the off-street lots has also led to parking
from people not associated with the Montrose
Shopping Park, such as residents and
employees of neighboring jurisdictions.

Additionally, current enforcement of the off-
street parking lots poses several challenges.

The time limit restrictions (3-hour and 9-hour)
are different than the time limit restrictions
for most of the on-street segments (2-hour),
requiring a more dynamic enforcement
strategy. These varied restrictions also
cause confusion to parking users trying to
understand the Montrose parking system.

For both options, to discourage employees
from parking in the highest demand lots,
employee permit parking would be restricted
to only a select number of lots that still
provide some geographic disbursement
for walking convenience, such as Lots
2, 3 and possibly a portion of lot 4.

To address the identified challenges, this study
considers two implementation options for
updating the employee parking program – one
focusing on a paid parking strategy for the
off-street lots and one focusing on an adjusted
time limit strategy for the off-street lots
OPTION 1 – CHARGE FOR

OFF-STREET PARKING
One approach to help resolve the identified
challenges would be to introduce paid parking
for the off-street lots. Under a paid parking
approach, parking demand would be balanced
through a tiered pricing structure, with the
highest price for on-street parking, a lower price
for the off-street lots, and a discounted price
or potentially no charge for employee parking
permits. Lots 2, 4, 6 and 7 exceed 85 percent
occupancy for more than four hours. Installing
pay stations and charging for parking in these
more heavily utilized lots could be justified
based on observed demand alone; however,
charging for parking in only these lots will shift
demand to the surrounding lots; therefore,
introducing paid parking should be considered
for all public off-street lots within Montrose.

A paid parking system for the off-street lots
would also help streamline parking enforcement
and management, as this would create an
approach consistent with the current on-street
paid parking. Due to the number of spaces in the
off-street lots, pay stations are recommended
instead of meters for each individual space.

With the introduction of these pay stations for
Example pay station
188 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 202524
Prepared by
the off-street facilities, consideration should
also be given to converting all on-street
segments into a pay station system and the
upfront capital costs required to implement the
system. Implementing this option would also
require employers to educate their employees
on how to obtain an employee parking permit
and which lots allow employee parking.

The focus of funding generation for this option
would be primarily through customers/
visitors paying hourly rates for off street
parking, and the focus of enforcement
efforts would be primarily through
enforcing customer/visitor paid parking.

OPTION 2 – ADJUST TIME

LIMIT RESTRICTIONS
Another option to help address the identified
challenges would be to adjust the time limit
restrictions for the off-street lots. Under
this approach, parking demand would be
balanced by reducing the allowed time
limits for parking in the off-street lots
to discourage long-term parking in high
demand areas. This option would maintain
free parking for short-term visitors in the
off-street lots and charge a higher fee for
employee parking permits than for Option 1.

As mentioned, the off-street lots currently
offer 3-hour parking and some 9-hour parking
in Lot 3; however, as shown in the Parking
Duration of Stay section of this report, most
visitors to Montrose park for 2 hours or
less. To better reflect observed demand and
further disincentivize long-term parking, all
time limit restrictions in the off-street lots
could be adjusted to 2-hour parking, aligning
with the time limit restriction for most of
the on-street segments in Montrose. This
alignment would also alleviate parking user
confusion from varied time limit restrictions.

Since this option would not introduce paid
parking in the off-street lots, the employee
permit fee for would need to be set higher
than that for Option 1 to help cover the
cost of administering the program and
long-term capital improvement projects.

Implementing this option would also require
employers to educate their employees on
how to obtain an employee parking permit
and which lots allow employee parking.

The focus of funding generation for this option
would be primarily through employees/
employers paying the cost of employee parking
permits, and the focus of enforcement efforts
would be primarily through enforcing time limit
restrictions of both customers and employees.

A table comparing the key
characteristics of the two options is
provided on the following page.
189 of 383

City of Glendale • Montrose Parking Analysis 2025 25

EMPLOYEE PARKING PROGRAM OPTIONS

COMPARISON SUMMARY
The following matrix summarizes the key characteristics of each employee parking program option:

PAID

PARKING

TIME LIMIT

RESTRICTIONS

EMPLOYEE

PARKING

PERMITS

LONG-TERM

CUSTOMER

PARKING

UPFRONT

CAPITAL
COSTS

FOCUS OF

FUNDING

GENERATION

FOCUS OF

ENFORCEMENT

EFFORTS

REQUIRED

EDUCATION/

OUTREACH
Option 1
Introduces
paid parking
for all off-
street lots,
at lower
price than
for on-street
Removes
time limit
restrictions
for off-
street lots
Free or
discounted
rate,
restricted
to lots 2, 3,
and possibly
a portion
of Lot 4
Adds
flexibility for
customers to
park longer
if desired
Yes, for pay
stations and
signage
Primarily
customers
through
hourly
payments
Primarily
through
enforcing
customer
paid parking
Yes
Option 2
Maintains
free parking
for off-
street lots
Reduces time
limits for
off-street lots
to 2 hours
Higher rate
than Option
1, Restricted
to Lots 2, 3,
and possibly
a portion
of Lot 4
No long-term
customer
parking
available
Yes, for
signage only
Primarily
employees
through cost
of permits
Primarily
through
enforcing
time limit
restrictions
of both
customers
and
employees
Yes
190 of 383

Prepared for the City of Glendale by
191 of 383

10a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award of Contracts to Ferguson Enterprises, LLC and Willdan Engineering Inc. for Glendale Water and Power’s (GWP) Water Advanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) System Replacement Project.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for April 28, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GWP respectfully recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute a contract with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC for the replacement of the City’s Water AMI system, and a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Willdan Engineering Inc. for inspection services related to the project. The project will replace approximately 36,000 water meters and communication endpoints and will implement a modern AMI software platform. The new system will improve operational efficiency, enhance leak detection, and provide customers with access to detailed water usage data to support conservation efforts. 192 of 383

210a
6 7
3 4

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract with Ferguson for the Water AMI System Replacement Project in an amount not to exceed $24,073,982, a contingency of $2,407,398, and $199,075 for four additional years of continued software support and maintenance.

It is further recommended to execute a PSA with Willdan for construction inspection services in the amount of $462,400 related to GWP’s Water AMI System Replacement Project.

ANALYSIS
GWP’s existing water AMI system has reached its end-of-life and no longer meets the reliability, performance, and data requirements needed to support modern utility operations and customer service expectations. It is critical that GWP replace the existing AMI system, as the current system’s communication failure rate of approximately 40% is placing a significant burden on Field Services to perform manual meter reads, increasing the number of estimated usage, and preventing customers from monitoring and managing their usage. In addition, several application systems are no longer supported. Further delays may result in annual cost increases of 9% - 10% due to an increase in labor and materials.

To address these challenges, on May 6, 2025, via Resolution No. 25-55, the City Council authorized the General Manager of GWP to utilize the alternative project delivery method and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 4017 to solicit proposals for the full replacement of GWP’s water AMI system, including meters, communication modules (endpoints), software, and associated services. RFP No. 4017 also includes an optional component for meter box lid replacement to ensure compatibility with the new AMI equipment and to address aging infrastructure.

RFP No. 4017 was released on May 8, 2025 on the City’s website, and attracted four proposals from qualified vendors with experience in large-scale municipal water AMI deployments. An evaluation committee comprised of GWP Business Systems Support Administrator, NV5 consultant, Assistant General Manager - Water, and Water Superintendent, reviewed and scored proposals based on the criteria outlined in the RFP, including:
Professional Qualifications, Technical Capabilities, and Experience of Contractor (30%)
Cost and Budget Control (30%)
Completeness of Proposal and Schedule (5%)
Approach and Methodology (35%)
Proposals were evaluated based on a weighted scoring methodology, with each evaluation category rated from 1 to 10 points, resulting in a maximum possible weighted score of 40 points.
193 of 383

310a
6 7
3 4
Scorer Ferguson Aquametric Core and Main Itron
1 8.7 7.65 6.95 5.95
2 8.95 8.45 7.8 5.85
3 8.25 7.65 8.15 4.35
4 8.35 7.65 6.75 6.4
Total 34.25 31.4 29.65 22.55
Following the evaluation process, Ferguson Enterprises, LLC was identified as the highest-ranked proposer and the vendor providing the best overall value. Staff subsequently entered into negotiations to finalize scope, pricing, and contract terms.

The Water AMI System Replacement Project includes the following major components:
Replacement of approximately 36,000 water meters
Installation of new AMI communication endpoints
Replacement of meter box lids
Deployment and configuration of AMI head-end software
Integration with GWP’s Customer Information System (CIS) and operational systems
Customer notification and coordination during installation Training, testing, system acceptance, and post-installation support Ferguson Enterprises, LLC will provide a solution and will be responsible for all project logistics, including procurement, storage, disposal of removed equipment, and installation.

Ferguson Enterprises, LLC will utilize subcontractors for key components of the project, including Professional Meters, Inc. (PMI) for the installation of meters, endpoints, and lids; JM Electrical Services for the installation of AMI network gateways, and Neptune Technology Group for the provision of the head-end software and cloud hosting solution.

The proposed Agreement with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC provides for a five-year term of maintenance and support for the hosted head-end software, Neptune 360. The first year is included in the initial implementation cost, while funding for years two through five will be addressed through the City’s annual budget process.

Service Description Total Price
Year 2 - NEPTUNE 360 Subscription $ 48,660.00
Year 3 - NEPTUNE 360 Subscription $ 48,660.00
Year 4 - NEPTUNE 360 Subscription $ 50,125.00
Year 5 - NEPTUNE 360 Subscription $ 51,630.00
Total $199,075.00
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC has been selected and is being recommended, to the City 194 of 383

410a
6 7
3 4
Council based on its demonstrated experience, technical solution, competitive pricing, and ability to deliver a comprehensive AMI replacement with minimal impact to GWP operations and customers. The proposed system will improve meter read reliability, provide near real-time usage data, enhance leak detection capabilities, and support water conservation initiatives.

Subsequent to the AMI replacement project RFP, an separate RFP for construction inspection services was released on January 29, 2026, on the City’s Website and BidNet Direct. Five proposals were received and scored as outlined below:
Project Understanding and Approach (25%)
Experience/Qualifications of Project Inspector (50%)
Budget (25%)
Rank Proposal Location Proposal Amount
1 Willdan Industry, CA $462,400
2 NV5 Irvine, CA $421,700
3 LAE Associates Placentia, CA $421,600
4 MKN Irvine, CA $571,200
5 JMD Industry, CA $389,177.60
Upon review of the five proposals, GWP staff determined that Willdan Engineering Inc. is the most qualified consultant to perform construction inspection services. Although NV5, Inc. submitted a lower bid, the firm’s prior involvement in the project design and participation on the evaluation committee presents a conflict of interest; therefore, it was not considered for this role. While JMDiaz submitted the lowest responsive bid, Willdan was selected based on its relevant experience with similar projects and its ability to provide independent and qualified inspection services.

Willdan Engineering’s proposal was reviewed for completeness and found to be in compliance with the RFP requirements set forth in GWP Water’s AMI System Replacement Project.

Willdan Engineering’s inspector shall be responsible for daily construction observation for this project, including project closeout.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for Ferguson Enterprises, LLC for the Water AMI System Replacement Project is $24,073,982, plus a ten percent (10%) contingency of $2,407,398. This amount covers the design, implementation, and first-year software maintenance and support of the Water AMI System.

Willdan Engineering Inc.’s inspection services for the project will cost $462,400. 195 of 383

510a
6 7
3 4
The total project cost is $24,073,982, of which $11,644,556 is available in the FY 2025- 26 budget. The remaining $12,429,426 will be requested through the FY 2026-27 annual proposed budget. Future obligations for the annual maintenance contract with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC, will be included in the annual budget process for subsequent years.

The City Council approved and proposed funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$11,644,556 GL: 51200-5930-GWP-0020-P0000-
PL: W14712
Water Depreciation Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Glendale Water
and Power
Projects
Proposed Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$12,429,426 GL: 51200-5930-GWP-0020-P0000-
PL: W14712
Water Depreciation Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Glendale Water
and Power
Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15302, repair, maintenance, or minor alterations of existing utility facilities, and replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems or facilities.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company are attached as Exhibit A for Ferguson; Exhibit B for Willdan; Exhibit C for Professional Meters, Inc. (PMI); Exhibit D for JM Electrical Services, and Exhibit E for Neptune Technology Group in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Not to approve the proposed action and, instead, direct the General Manager of GWP, or his designee, to abandon the Water AMI System Replacement Project and return to manual meter reading. This will result in an increase to GWP Customer Service staffing levels by ten meter reader positions, and will require posting and filling the positions, training staff, and the procurement of the needed hand-held meter reading devices for these new positions.
196 of 383

610a
6 7
3 4
Alternative 2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. 197 of 383

610a
6 7
3 4
198 of 383

710a
6 7
3 4

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Scott K. Mellon, P.E., General Manager - Glendale Water and Power Prepared by:

Chisom Obegolu, P.E., Assistant General Manager - Water Yancarlo Alcantara, Utility Business System Support Administrator Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Ferguson Enterprises, LLC Exhibit B: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Willdan Engineering Inc.

Exhibit C: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Professional Meters, Inc. (PMI) Exhibit D: Campaign Finance Disclosure for JM Electrical Services Exhibit E: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Neptune Technology Group 199 of 383

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale, having previously by Resolution No. 25-55, authorized the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power (GWP) to prepare a Request For Proposals (RFP), RFP No. 4017, using the alternative project delivery method for the Water Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Replacement Project, hereby accepts and approves the proposal of Ferguson Enterprises, LLC as recommended by the Report dated April 28, 2026 by the General Manager of GWP, and authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC, in the not-to-exceed amount of $24,073,982, plus a ten (10%) contingency in the amount of $2,407,398 for the design and implementation of the Water AMI System and software maintenance and support for the first year. The City Manager, or his designee, is further authorized to enter into and execute an amendment with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC for four additional years of software support and maintenance, at the not-to-exceed amount of $199,075 to provide continued software support and maintenance for the Water AMI System. Any subsequent software support and maintenance with Ferguson Enterprises, LLC beyond the first five years shall be approved as part of the annual city-wide budget process. Said agreement and amendment(s) shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
200 of 383

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale, hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering Inc., California for construction inspection services related to the City’s Water AMI System Replacement Project, in the amount of $462,400. Said agreement shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
201 of 383

EXHIBIT A
202 of 383

203 of 383

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pres
ident
● Chief Op
erating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members
of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, en
tity, or organization
● Name of any
campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organi zation Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

EXHIBIT B
204 of 383

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Pattie Cassie
Assistant Secretary
2401 E. Katella Avenue Ste 300
Anaheim
CA
92806
2 205 of 383

PF:122
City of Glendale
• V. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
• The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
• Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

EXHIBIT C
206 of 383

PF:123
• Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

• CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
■ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ■ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ■ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc

207 of 383

EXHIBIT D
208 of 383

209 of 383

EXHIBIT E
210 of 383

211 of 383

10b
26-89860

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Doran Street Grade Separation Project Dedications and Maintenance Agreements

1. Resolution dedicating a portion of city-owned property for public street and ramp purposes and accepting the same into the city street system

2. Resolution dedicating a portion of city-owned property to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain purposes

3. Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a citywide master freeway maintenance agreement with Caltrans.

4. Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute an operations and maintenance agreement with the City of Los Angeles.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for April 28, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Doran Street Grade Separation Project (Project) is located at the Metrolink rail corridor crossing along Doran Street, between San Fernando Road in Glendale and San Fernando Road West located in Los Angeles. This crossing is one of the highest-risk rail crossings in Los Angeles County, with a history of collisions and fatalities, making this grade separation project a critical safety investment. The project will replace the existing at-grade railroad crossing with a grade-separated connection to the Fairmont Avenue overpass and includes roadway circulation improvements in the vicinity of San Fernando Road West and Doran Street.

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council approval of several actions necessary to support implementation and long-term operation of infrastructure improvements associated with the Project and related transportation improvements in the area.

These actions will establish the property rights, jurisdictional responsibilities, and interagency agreements necessary to support transportation, storm drainage, and operational coordination associated with the project area. 212 of 383

10b2
26-89860
6 7
5 6

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution dedicating a portion of city-owned property for public street and ramp purposes and accepting the same into the city street system, and approve a resolution dedicating a portion of city-owned property to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain purposes; and approve motions authorizing the City Manager to execute a freeway maintenance agreement with Caltrans, and an operations and maintenance agreement with the City of Los Angeles related to the Doran Street Grade Separation Project.

ANALYSIS
The Doran Street Grade Separation Project is a regional transportation improvement aimed at enhancing safety and improving traffic operations at the existing at-grade railroad crossing along Doran Street, located at the Metrolink rail corridor between San Fernando Road in the City of Glendale and San Fernando Road West partially in the City of Los Angeles. The project will replace the existing at-grade railroad crossing with a grade-separated crossing connecting San Fernando Road West to the Fairmont Avenue overpass, improving traffic circulation and eliminating conflicts between rail and roadway traffic. Upon completion of the San Fernando Road West Extension Bridge and opening of the new roadway connection to traffic, Doran Street will be permanently closed at the railroad crossing to eliminate the existing at-grade rail crossing.

The project is being advanced through coordination between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), the City of Glendale, the City of Los Angeles, Metrolink, Caltrans, and other regional agencies. Improvements associated with the project include construction of a new bridge structure, roadway realignments, and related drainage and traffic infrastructure.

The project area includes the Metrolink rail corridor that crosses Doran Street between San Fernando Road and San Fernando Road West, which are two parallel roadways that run along the rail corridor in this portion of both cities.

The jurisdictional boundary between the City of Glendale and the City of Los Angeles in this area generally follows an east-west alignment along the north side of Doran Street, west of the railroad right-of-way. East of that point, the boundary shifts and follows along the railroad right-of-way south of Doran Street. The general project location and jurisdictional boundary configuration are shown on Exhibit “A.” As a result of this boundary configuration, portions of the project area are located within each city’s jurisdiction.

Accordingly, improvements associated with the Doran Street Grade Separation Project and related roadway connections require coordination between both cities to establish operational responsibilities and long-term maintenance obligations.

San Fernando Road West south of Doran Street is entirely within the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles. However, the proposed San Fernando Road West extension, including the San Fernando Road West Extension Bridge, will be constructed primarily within the City of Glendale jurisdiction. The new roadway and bridge will connect to the existing Fairmont Avenue bridge via a new San Fernando Road West Extension Bridge. 213 of 383

10b3
26-89860
6 7
5 6
The bridge portion of the San Fernando Road West extension will be located entirely within the City of Glendale and will pass beneath the State Route 134 freeway and the Fairmont Avenue overpass before it elevates over the Verdugo Wash (a tributary of the Los Angeles River) and connects to the Fairmont Avenue Overpass bridge structure.

The proposed San Fernando Road West extension will traverse property currently owned by the City of Glendale and utilized by Glendale Water and Power (GWP) for maintenance equipment storage and parking. GWP is currently utilizing portions of the city-owned parcel located beneath the Fairmont Avenue overpass for staging, operations trailers, and storage of equipment and materials associated with the Grayson Power Plant Replacement Project. Construction schedules have been coordinated to avoid conflicts, with GWP anticipating to vacate the site by November 1, 2026. The roadway extension will bisect the existing parcel, creating a new public roadway connection that will improve circulation and connectivity in the project area while supporting the planned grade separation improvements.

Based on the current project schedule, Metro’s contractor for the Doran Street Grade Separation Project may require access to portions of the city parcel during Stage 2 construction. Staff recommends that Metro include provisions in the construction contract bid documents requiring the contractor to coordinate with the City of Glendale Public Works Department and Glendale Water and Power prior to accessing the city parcel, the proposed street dedication area, or the storm drain easement areas. Access and construction activities will also be subject to the city’s Public Works permit process to ensure appropriate coordination between the contractor and city departments.

Required Dedications and Maintenance Agreements
When streets are constructed or improved on city-owned properties, the City Council must dedicate the properties for public street purposes. State law also requires that public streets and alleys be accepted by City Council resolution into the City Street System.

Furthermore, when a storm drain system is constructed within the city, the city and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) have a long-standing practice of transferring such facilities to the District for ownership, maintenance, and operation, provided they are constructed to District standards. In this case, the city is dedicating the land on which the storm drain will be permanently installed as part of the project. The design and construction of the storm drain are being led by Metro, and upon completion, the facility will be transferred to the District to be operated as part of the regional storm drain system.

To accommodate the roadway extension and related infrastructure improvements, portions of this city-owned parcel must be dedicated for public street and ramp purposes, while other portions must be dedicated to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain purposes.

In addition to the property dedications, the city must execute interagency agreements that define long-term maintenance responsibilities for transportation infrastructure associated with the project.
214 of 383

10b4
26-89860
6 7
5 6
The proposed Operations and Maintenance Agreement between the City of Glendale and the City of Los Angeles establishes each agencies responsibilities for maintaining transportation infrastructure within its jurisdiction, The City of Glendale will maintain improvements within Glendale city limits including roadway, bridge, drainage, landscaping, traffic signal, and lighting infrastructure constructed as part of the project.

The City of Los Angeles will maintain similar improvements within its jurisdiction along San Fernando Road West.

The proposed Freeway Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans is a citywide agreement that updates and supersedes prior maintenance agreements between the city and Caltrans and clarifies the division of maintenance responsibilities for facilities located where city streets cross over or under the State freeway system. The agreement applies to existing city street overcrossings and undercrossings of State Routes within the City of Glendale, and facilities along State Routes 2, 5, 134, and 210, including walls, landscaped areas and bicycle and pedestrian paths, lanes, and trails. The agreement establishes the respective responsibilities of Caltrans and the city for maintaining roadway, structural, and operational elements associated with these facilities. Under the agreement, Caltrans will retain responsibility for the structural components of freeway bridge structures and related elements located within the State highway right-of-way, including bridge decks, superstructures, substructures, and other structural components associated with freeway facilities. The City of Glendale will be responsible for maintaining the local street improvements located on or above the bridge deck or within the city roadway portion of undercrossings. These responsibilities include roadway asphalt pavement, striping, signage, traffic control devices, sidewalks, street lighting installed by the city, and other roadway features within the city’s jurisdiction.

Ongoing Operations and Maintenance Costs
Approval of the proposed actions will not result in an immediate fiscal impact. However, upon completion of the project, the city will assume future operation and maintenance responsibilities associated with the San Fernando Road West extension roadway and bridge facilities that will be owned and maintained by the City of Glendale.

These responsibilities include bridge structural inspections and maintenance, roadway pavement and striping, traffic signals, drainage facilities, landscaping and irrigation systems and street lighting. The city’s maintenance responsibilities will also include removal of graffiti, debris, and un-housed encampments within the city street portions of overcrossings and undercrossings, and other facilities including walls, landscaped areas and bicycle and pedestrian paths, lanes, and trails consistent with city policies and applicable State and Federal law.

Preliminary cost estimates have been prepared for these facilities over a twenty-year life cycle and are expected to increase over time as infrastructure ages and additional maintenance activities are required. Estimated annual costs are as follows:
Years 0–5 following project completion: approximately $243,840 per year 215 of 383

10b5
26-89860
6 7
5 6
Years 6–10: approximately $338,320 per year
Years 11–15: approximately $486,896 per year
Years 16–20: approximately $740,372 per year
The increase in projected costs in later years reflects the anticipated need for more extensive maintenance activities associated with aging infrastructure, including bridge maintenance and inspections, roadway rehabilitation, replacement of landscaping and irrigation components, and repair or replacement of electrical and lighting equipment, along with escalation and inflation adjustments.

Future costs will be incorporated into ongoing Public Works infrastructure maintenance programs and will be subject to future budget appropriations by the City Council.

Approval of these actions will establish the necessary property rights and clearly define interagency maintenance responsibilities needed to support construction, operation, and long-term maintenance of transportation infrastructure associated with the Doran Street Grade Separation Project.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Metro is responsible for stakeholder outreach and communications, with support from the City of Glendale, City of Los Angeles, and Caltrans, except as otherwise provided in any existing Cooperative Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The Doran Street Grade Separation Contractor shall support Metro’s outreach efforts, as directed, by providing timely and accurate construction schedules, phasing plans, and impact information necessary to support coordination with the City of Glendale and the public.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report at this time. However, upon completion of the project, the city will assume long-term operations and maintenance responsibilities for the San Fernando Road West extension roadway and bridge facilities, as described in the Analysis section. The estimated annual cost is approximately $243,840 per year for the first five years, with increases expected in subsequent years. These costs will be incorporated into future Public Works maintenance programs and subject to annual budget appropriations.

The proposed citywide master freeway maintenance agreement does not incorporate new street maintenance responsibilities but rather better outlines agency division of responsibilities where city streets cross under or over freeway facilities and State of California right-of-way. Stakeholder coordination with internal departments including but not limited to Police Department, Community Development, Community Services & Parks, and Public Works confirmed that the proposed freeway maintenance agreement provide the appropriate division of responsibilities and are in line with current maintenance and response activities.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The activity under consideration is categorically exempt either as a Class 1 project 216 of 383

10b6
26-89860
6 7
5 6
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301, which consists, among other things, of minor alterations to existing public facilities or mechanical equipment; or, in the alternative, as a Class 3 project pursuant to 15303, which consists, among other things, of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities. In any event, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; thus, it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Do not approve the resolutions dedicating and accepting a portion of city-owned property for public street and ramp purposes into the City Street System or dedicating a portion of city-owned property to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain purposes, nor approve the motions authorizing the City Manager to execute a Freeway Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans and an Operations and Maintenance Agreement with the City of Los Angeles related to the Doran Street Grade Separation Project. Doing so will prevent the project from being constructed, leaving one of the highest-risk existing at-grade crossing in Los Angeles County in place.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works / City Engineer Pastor Casanova, T.E., Principal Traffic Engineer
Negin Rezaei, Civil Engineering Associate
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2: Legal Descriptions and Dedication Maps
Exhibit 3: Correspondence from Los Angeles County Flood Control District Exhibit 4: Freeway Maintenance Agreement
Exhibit 5: Operations and Maintenance Agreement with the City of Los Angeles 217 of 383

1 6
8 3
6 RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, DEDICATING AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF CITY PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC STREET AND RAMP PURPOSES INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1: The following described parcel of land owned by the City of Glendale shall be dedicated for public street and ramp purposes to become a part of the public street (San Fernando Road West) located North of State Route 134 and Southwesterly boundary of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (L.A.C.T.C.) right-of-way (formerly South Pacific Railroad right-of-way) and is accepted into the street system of the City of Glendale:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Refer to attached Exhibit 1, Legal Descriptions and Maps, said exhibit by reference thereto is made a part hereof. Said property shall become a part of the public street located North of State Route 134 and Southwesterly boundary of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (L.A.C.T.C.) right-of-way (formerly South Pacific Railroad right-of-way) as shown on the attached Exhibit 1 maps.

SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby directed to file said Plan in the office of the City Clerk as adopted by this Resolution.

Adopted this _____ day of ____________, 2026.
___________________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk
218 of 383

1 6
8 3
6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS
I, SUZIE ABAJIAN, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. __________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of ____________, 2026, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
219 of 383

1 6
8 3
7 RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, DEDICATING AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF CITY PROPERTY

FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1: The following described parcel of land owned by the City of Glendale shall be dedicated for Storm Drain Purposes to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District located North of State Route 134 and Southwesterly boundary of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (L.A.C.T.C.) right-of-way (formerly South Pacific Railroad right-of-way):

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Refer to attached Exhibit 1, Legal Descriptions and Maps, said exhibit by reference thereto is made a part hereof. Said property shall be dedicated for Storm Drain Purposes to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District located North of State Route 134 and Southwesterly boundary of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (L.A.C.T.C.) right-of-way (formerly South Pacific Railroad right-of-way) as shown on the attached Exhibit 1 maps.

SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby directed to file said Plan in the office of the City Clerk as adopted by this Resolution.

Adopted this _____ day of ____________, 2026.
___________________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk
220 of 383

1 6
8 3
7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
221 of 383

10b
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ,
seconded by Council Member __, that the
Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a citywide Freeway Maintenance Agreement between the City of Glendale and the Caltrans for the maintenance of City streets and facilities at freeway over crossings and under crossings, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, and as recommended in the staff report of the Director of Public Works dated April 28, 2026.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________
City Clerk
222 of 383

10b
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ,
seconded by Council Member __, that the
Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an Operations and Maintenance Agreement between the City of Glendale and the City of Los Angeles for the operation and maintenance of the new San Fernando Road West Extension street and bridge facilities associated with the Doran Street Grade Separation Project, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, and as recommended in the staff report of the Director of Public Works dated April 28, 2026.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________
City Clerk
223 of 383

Exhibit 1
224 of 383

EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

DEDICATION PORTION OF CITY PROPERTY

FOR PUBLIC STREET SYSTEM
THAT PORTION OF LOT 6 OF TRACT NO. 646, IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGES 162 AND 163 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF DEED RECORDED MAY 3, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3215, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAJD CORNER BEING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY

BOUNDARY OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY, 100.00 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 184, PAGES 69 THROUGH 73, INCLUSIVE OF RECORD OF SURVEY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID DEED, S65°02'28"W 165.01 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCA VE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HA YING A RADIUS OF 211.75 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS N47°1 l '26"E, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING

SAID NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°53'33", AN ARC LENGTH OF 58.73 FEET; THENCE S26°55'0l"E 99.25 FEET; THENCE N63°04'59"E 2.75 FEET; THENCE S26°55'01 "E 4.91 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID DEED; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, S76°39'35"W 49.38 FEET; T H
ENCE
LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, N71°55'0l"W 9.20 FEET; THENCE S63°04'59"W 20.42 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, S76°39'35"W

8.17 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, N26°55'0l"W 24.08 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 26.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM SAID LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE AS HAVING AND BEARING AND DISTANCE OF "S63°04'59"W 20.42 FEET"; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, N63°04'59"E 28.37 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, Nl8°05'06"E 11.67 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 43.50 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM SAID LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE AS HA VlNG AND BEARING AND DISTANCE OF "S26°55'0l"E 99.25 FEET"; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, N26°55'0l"W 51.81 FEET TO A CURVE THAT IS CONCENTRIC WITH AND DISTANT 43.50 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM SAID CURVE DESCRIBED ABOVE AS HA YING A RADIUS OF 211.75 FEET; THENCE

NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CONCENTRIC CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°44'04", AN ARC LENGTH OF 60.89 FEET TO SAID NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DEED RECORDED MAY 3, 1974; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY, N65°02'28"E 46.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINS: 7,897 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

EXHIBIT "B" IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.

NOTE:

THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS NOT PREPARED FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT WOIB,D BE IN

VIOLATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OR LOCAL ORDINANCES OF THE GOVERNING BODY HAVING JURISDICTION.

SHEET 1 OF 2
Exhibit 2

Page 1 ends

Glendale City CouncilApril 28, 2026

Glendale City Council
April 28, 2026