Glendora City Council
January 24, 2023

Mark Carnahan (FWS-LA-22-0068834-CEQA) 2
flooding from the hillside areas to the north. One flood control access road would also be constructed and connected to the main proposed private street to the basins.

Service Comments
We offer the following comments on the IS/MND and BRTR to assist the City in avoiding and minimizing the project’s potential impacts on sensitive resources:

General Comments

1. The project includes a large footprint along the project site’s northern edge to accommodate the proposed flood control and debris basins, the access roads for maintenance of the basins, and grading/grooming areas adjacent to the basins and access road. Figure 2-6 of the IS/MND shows the proposed cut/fill areas, which indicates that much of the oak woodland at the base of the hills will be removed and filled to accommodate the access road. Much of the proposed cut and fill areas, as well as the minor grading/grooming areas are labeled as temporary impacts on Figure 7 of the BRTR. Any impact areas that will not be returned to original grade with the original topsoil should be included in the permanent impacts. In addition, any impact area that supports native vegetation that is not restored following impacts should be included in the permanent impacts.

2. The project site appears to have been severely degraded following the Colby Fire in 2014. Site conditions prior to the fire appear to have supported substantial coastal sage scrub and coast live oak woodland in areas that now support non-native grassland. The project now proposes to remove the majority of the remaining oak woodland and coastal sage scrub on site. Much of these impacts are in the footprint for the proposed flood control/debris basins and associated access road, which will require significant cut and fill within areas of the remaining oak woodland. As noted above, any cut/fill areas should be considered permanent impacts. We recommend evaluating the proposed footprint to determine if there are alternatives that can reduce impacts to the remaining native vegetation on site.

3. The project proposes to offset coastal sage scrub impacts at a 1:1 ratio. As noted above, much of the project site previously supported coastal sage scrub prior to the 2014 Colby Fire, but much of this area has since converted to non-native grassland. Coastal sage scrub is a native vegetation community that is becoming increasingly rare in southern California due to increased fire frequency and because it grows in areas that readily accommodate development. Due to the importance of this native habitat for supporting nesting birds and dispersal along the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, we recommend impacts to coastal sage scrub area be offset at a 2:1 ratio. We also recommend that any revegetation in upland temporary impact areas include coastal sage scrub species in the plant palette to facilitate restoration of the area to native vegetation.

Replanting of cut/fill slopes for erosion control should also be done using native species to reduce the presence of non-native species within the project footprint and further facilitate successful restoration of temporary impacts.

F1-3
Cont.

F1-4
F1-5
F1-6
F1-7
F1-8
Item #8. Page 1459
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1524

Mark Carnahan (FWS-LA-22-0068834-CEQA) 3
Sensitive Species Surveys

4. The BRTR notes that surveys in 2019 did not detect the federally threatened threadleaved Brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) and that the project site does not support the appropriate clay soils to support this species. Please note that there are records for B. filifolia within about 0.2 mile and 1.5 mile to the east in areas mapped by U.S. Department of Agriculture as the same soil type as the project site. In addition, though the species was noted to be blooming at the reference site near Colby Trail at the time of project surveys, B. filifolia does not always bloom concurrent with available reference populations and can be difficult to detect depending on drought conditions and non-native vegetation overgrowth. Therefore, we recommend conducting additional surveys for B. filifolia within the non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub areas to support the IS/MND’s conclusion that it is absent from the project site.

5. The BRTR notes that surveys did not detect the federally endangered Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astragalus brauntonii). This species is known to occur in similar habitat to the project site in areas that have been recently disturbed by natural or anthropogenic events such as fire. Because widespread focused surveys for this species have not been conducted on private parcels within all suitable habitat, we recommend conducting focused surveys for this species to further reduce the risk of having missed detecting the species on the site.

6. The IS/MND and BRTR do not include an analysis of whether the project site has the potential to support the San Gabriel chestnut snail (Glyptostoma gabrielense), which is a sensitive species that generally occurs in moist drainage areas under logs, rocks, or leaf litter in habitats such as oak woodlands. This species has been detected less than

0.8 mile to the northwest of the project site in similar habitat. We recommend conducting surveys for this species to determine if it occurs on the project site. Surveys should be conducted during wet conditions, generally between January and March if possible. This species may also be detected by searching for empty shells within appropriate habitat throughout the year.

We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Lauren Kershek1
.

Sincerely,
Jonathan D. Snyder
Assistant Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
1 [email protected]
for
CAROL

ROBERTS
Digitally signed by

CAROL ROBERTS
Date: 2022.08.04
13:09:20 -07'00'
F1-9
F1-10
F1-11
F1-12
Item #8. Page 1460
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1525

Mark Carnahan (FWS-LA-22-0068834-CEQA) 4

LITERATURE CITED
Dudek. 2022a. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Grand Estates Residential Subdivision Project. Prepared for the City of Glendora. June.

Dudek. 2022b. Biological Resources Technical Report, Grand Estates Project. Prepared for the City of Glendora. March.

Item #8. Page 1461
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1526
Comment Letter S1
State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director South Coast Region
3883 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 467-4201
www.wildlife.ca.gov

SENT BY EMAIL ONLY
July 29, 2022
Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora
116 East Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, CA 91741
[email protected]
Subject: Grand Estates, Mitigated Negative Declaration, SCH #2022060712, City of Glendora, Los Angeles County
Dear Mr. Carnahan:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has reviewed an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR) from the City of Glendora (City) for the Grand Estates (Project). The Project is proposed by Dreamland Investments, LLC (Project Applicant). Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code.

CDFW’s Role
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State [Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subdivision (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, § 15386, subdivision (a)]. CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (Id., § 1802). Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect State fish and wildlife resources.

CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA (Pub. Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381). CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code, including lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.). Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in “take”, as defined by State law, of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), or CESA-listed rare plant pursuant to the Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA; Fish & G. Code, § 1900 et seq.), CDFW recommends the Project proponent obtain appropriate authorization under the Fish and Game Code.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-1
S1-2
Item #8. Page 1462
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1527

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
Project Description and Summary
Objective: The Project proposes to divide 27 acres into 11 acres designated for residential development and 16 acres designated as open space. The 11 acres will be located in the southern portion of the Project site and will be subdivided into 14 lots. Lot one will consist of the existing single-family residence that will remain in place. Lot four will be utilized for the installation of two private roads that will allow for road access throughout the residential development. The main private street will be constructed along the southeastern edge of the Project site with a smaller street splitting off to the northeast midway. The 12 remaining lots will each contain a graded pad upon which a custom home will be developed. The new lots will range in size from 20,000 square feet to 32,000 square feet. No home construction is currently planned for the Project site. The timing and construction of each custom home will occur at an unknown future date and time. Upon complete buildout, the southern portion of the Project site is anticipated to support 13 single-family residences.

In addition to the residential development, the Project currently supports three debris basins located within the 16 acres of open space. The existing debris basins are filled to capacity and do not function as intended. Due to the inability to function properly, all three basins will be demolished, and larger debris basins will be reconstructed in the same location. Each spillway inlet will be approximately five feet tall and connect to the storm drain system in the residential development via a 36-inch pipeline. An asphalt maintenance access road will also be constructed to allow maintenance vehicles access to the drainage facilities. Additionally, water, sewer, and storm drain infrastructure will be installed underground throughout the Project site.

In regard to biological resources, the Project site supports 835 trees of which 651 trees will need to be removed to allow for Project implementation. Of the 651 trees that will be removed, 455 trees are considered protected through the City tree ordinance or state regulations.

The first phase of construction will entail site preparation and grading activities. The total cut is anticipated to be approximately 94,500 cubic yards with total fill to be approximately 96,800 cubic yards. Long-term operation activities for the proposed Project include landscaping maintenance of the residential development, street cleaning, and maintenance of the three debris basins. Maintenance activities including sediment removal from the three debris basins will be managed by Los Angeles County Flood Control District and is anticipated to occur on an as-needed basis.

Location: The Project site is comprised of 27 acres at the northern terminus of Grand Avenue in the City of Glendora, Los Angeles County. The Project site is bounded by the San Gabriel mountains to the north, West Palm Drive to the south, North Silent Ranch Drive to the west, and Rainbow Drive to the east. The existing single-family residence within the Project site is located at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive. The Project location encompasses Assessor’s Parcel Number:
8684-045-004.

Comments and Recommendations
CDFW visited the Project site on July 14, 2022. Based on our review of the Project’s CEQA document and site visit, CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City in adequately avoiding and/or mitigating the Project’s impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. CDFW recommends the measures or revisions below be included in a science-based monitoring program that contains adaptive management strategies as part of the DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-3
S1-4
Item #8. Page 1463
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1528

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
Project’s CEQA mitigation, monitoring, and reporting program (Pub. Resources Code, § 21081.6; CEQA Guidelines, § 15097).

Specific Comments
Comment #1: Impacts to Mountain Lion (Puma concolor)
Issue: The Project could impact mountain lion through loss of foraging habitat and increase of human presence.

Specific impacts: The proposed Project may impact mountain lion by grading activities throughout the Project site as well as construction activities related to the debris basins. The Project may also impact mountain lion by increasing human presence through residential development and associated traffic, noise, and lighting.

Why impact would occur: The Project is located within the range of the Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionary Significant Unit of mountain lion. Specifically, it is located within the range of the San Gabriel/San Bernardino Mountains (SGSB) mountain lion population. The Project site is comprised of several vegetation communities including California sagebrush scrub, riparian habitat, and coast live oak woodlands, which provide habitat for this species. Based on the Mountain Lion Predicted Habitat CWHW dataset, the Project site provides medium habitat suitability (CWHR 2022). In addition to having suitable habitat on site, mule deer, the primary prey for mountain lion, were observed during field surveys. Furthermore, the BRTR states, “Mountain lion are expected to use the study area for foraging, movement through its home range, or during the dispersal of young, with most movement occurring at night”. The MND does not provide mitigation for permanent and temporal loss of mountain lion habitat within the Project site. The Project site may not be a designated wildlife corridor or linkage, but it is evident that the site supports local movement for this species.

Furthermore, the Project would increase human presence, traffic, noise, and potential artificial lighting, both during the Project construction and over the Project’s lifetime. Although the Project intends to install fencing and walls surrounding the residential development, that does not guarantee that human-wildlife conflicts will not occur. As human population density increases, the probability of persistence of mountain lion decreases (Woodroffe 2000). As California has continued to grow in human population and communities expand into wildland areas, there has been a commensurate increase in direct and indirect interaction between mountain lions and people (CDFW 2013). As a result, the need to relocate or humanely euthanize mountain lions (depredation kills) may increase for public safety. Mountain lions are exceptionally vulnerable to human disturbance (Lucas 2020). Areas of high human activity have lower occupancy of rare carnivores. Mountain lions tend to avoid roads and trails by the mere presence of those features, regardless of how much they are used (Lucas 2020). Increased traffic could cause vehicle strikes. Anthropogenic lighting could alter behavior and interactions of mountain lion in both the wildland and wildland-urban interface (Ditmer et al. 2020). Lighting could adversely alter how mountain lions and mule deer move and utilize the Project site and surrounding natural areas.

Evidence impact would be significant: The mountain lion is a specially protected mammal in the State (Fish and G. Code, § 4800). In addition, on April 21, 2020, the California Fish and Game Commission accepted a petition to list an evolutionarily significant unit of mountain lion in DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-4
Cont.

S1-5
Item #8. Page 1464
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1529

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
southern and central coastal California as threatened under CESA (CDFW 2022a). As a CESA candidate species, the mountain lion in southern California is granted full protection of a threatened species under CESA. Take of any endangered, threatened, candidate species that results from the Project is prohibited, except as authorized by State law (Fish & G. Code, §§ 86, 2062, 2067, 2068, 2080, 2085; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 786.9). As to CEQA, the status of mountain lion as a threatened species under CESA qualifies it as an endangered, rare, or threatened species under CEQA (CEQA Guidelines, §15380). No mitigation has been proposed for impacts on mountain lion from the Project from the standpoint of habitat loss and encroachment, as well as anthropogenic impacts discussed above.

Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s):

Recommendation #1: To improve the Project’s CEQA document, CDFW recommends the MND include a discussion regarding mountain lion’s special status under CESA. CDFW recommends the City discuss the Project’s potential impact on mountain lion from the standpoint of the following impacts:
1) Introducing new/additional barriers to dispersal (e.g., residential development); 2) Habitat loss and encroachment within Project site and surrounding areas; 3) Increased human presence, noise, and lighting; and
4) Use of herbicides, pesticides, and rodenticides.

Recommendation #2: Revisions to the Fish and Game Code, effective January 1998, may require that CDFW issue a separate CEQA document for the issuance of an Incidental Take Permit for the Project unless the Project’s CEQA document addresses all the Project’s impact on CESA endangered, threatened, and/or candidate species. The Project’s CEQA document should also specify a mitigation monitoring and reporting program that will meet the requirements of an Incidental Take Permit. It is important that the take proposed to be authorized by CDFW’s Incidental Take Permit be described in detail in the Project’s CEQA document. Also, biological mitigation monitoring and reporting proposals should be of sufficient detail and resolution to satisfy the requirements for an Incidental Take Permit. However, it is worth noting that mitigation for the Project’s impact on a CESA endangered, threatened, and/or candidate species proposed in the Project’s CEQA document may not necessarily satisfy mitigation required to obtain an Incidental Take Permit.

Mitigation Measure #1: If take or adverse impacts to mountain lion cannot be avoided, the Project Applicant should consult with CDFW and obtain appropriate take authorization from CDFW (pursuant to Fish & Game Code, § 2080 et seq). The Project Applicant should comply with the mitigation measures detailed in the take authorization issued by CDFW. The Project Applicant should provide a copy of a fully executed take authorization prior to the issuance of a grading permit and before any ground disturbance and vegetation removal.

Mitigation Measure #2: The Project Applicant should offset the loss of mountain lion foraging habitat such that there is no net loss or at a ratio acceptable to CDFW. Mitigation proposed to offset loss of foraging habitat should be disclosed in the final CEQA document. The mitigation proposed should also be justified as to how it would reduce the Project’s impact on mountain lion to less than significant. If the mitigation proposed is through off-site acquisition, the off-site habitat should be similar in kind, as near to the Project site as possible, and protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-5
Cont.

Item #8. Page 1465
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1530

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
Mitigation Measure #3: The Project Applicant should prohibit use of any rodenticides and second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides on the property in perpetuity. The Project Applicant should inform future homeowners that no rodenticides and second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides should be used on site at any time as a condition of home build or purchase.

Mitigation Measure #4: To prevent human-wildlife conflicts within the Project site and to keep mountain lions wild, the Project Applicant should incorporate the following elements into the design of the residential development, as well as management and maintenance of the residential residences in perpetuity:
 Never feed deer or other wildlife; it is illegal to feed deer and other big game in California and it will attract mountain lions;
 Deer-proof landscaping by avoiding plants that deer like to eat;  Trim brush to reduce hiding places for mountain lions;  Install motion-sensitive lighting around the residential development; and  Increase site permeability through permeable fence designs to limit physical obstructions to wildlife movement.

The Project Applicant should provide documentation and a plan with measures to prevent human-wildlife conflicts that should be incorporated into the Project prior to the City issuing appropriate permits.

Comment #2: Impacts to Thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) Issue: The Project may impact thread-leaved brodiaea, which is a CESA-and Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed species.

Specific Impacts: Grading activities and vegetation removal of the Project site may result in loss of individuals and population decrease of thread-leaved brodiaea. Construction activities related to the reconstruction of three debris basins and installment of an access road may involve machinery which may also result in direct loss of this plant species.

Why impacts would occur: Thread-leaved brodiaea has a limited range extending from the foothills of Glendora to Rancho Santa Fe in San Diego. This plant species is typically found among herbaceous plant communities that occur in open areas. Based on CNDDB, historical observations of thread-leaved brodiaea have been recorded less than two miles from the Project site (CDFW 2022e). In addition to historical observations, critical habitat for this species has been designated approximately 1.4 miles east of the Project site. The BRTR states that focused special-status plant surveys were conducted in May and July of 2014 and in May and July of 2019. Findings from the focused plant surveys concluded that “…thread-leaved brodiaea is not expected to occur on site.” According to the Thread-Leaved Brodiaea 5-Year Review:

Summary and Evaluation conducted by United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the blooming period extends from March to June (USFWS 2009). Based on the blooming period, surveys that were conducted in July were outside of the designated window for blooming. It is also noted by USFWS that seedlings and young plants that produce only leaves for a few years before they can produce flowers, may often go undetected during focused surveys (USFWS 2009).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-5
Cont.

S1-6
Item #8. Page 1466
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1531

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
The MND does not provide a mitigation measure requiring pre-construction surveys for threadleaved brodiaea. The Project proceeding based on false-negative results may lead to significant impacts on this species. Grading activities of the 11 acres for construction of grading pads may result in direct loss of thread-leaved brodiaea individuals. Additionally, construction of custom homes will occur over an unknown period of time. Prolonging construction of custom homes may result in long-term Project impacts. Alongside residential development, demolition of debris basins, reconstruction of debris basins, and installment of an access road may also impact undetected thread-leaved brodiaea in the northern portion of the Project site. Finally, if threadleaved brodiaea are within the Project site and were not detected, the overall population of this protected species will be significantly impacted.

Evidence impacts would be significant: Take of any endangered, threatened, candidate species that results from the Project is prohibited, except as authorized by State law (Fish & G.

Code, §§ 86, 2062, 2067, 2068, 2080, 2085; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 786.9). Consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15380, thread-leaved brodiaea as an endangered species under CESA qualifies it as an endangered, rare, or threatened species under CEQA and should be treated as such.

Impacts to any sensitive or special status species should be considered significant under CEQA unless they are clearly mitigated below a level of significance. The Project and environmental document should be conditioned to avoid and/or mitigate for potential impacts to thread-leaved brodiaea if present. Inadequate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures for impacts to sensitive or special status species will result in the Project continuing to have a substantial adverse direct, indirect, and cumulative effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species by CDFW.

Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s):

Mitigation Measure #5: The Project Applicant should retain a qualified botanist with experience surveying for southern California rare plants to conduct focused surveys for the presence and/or absence of thread-leaved brodiaea within the Project site. The focused surveys should be conducted during the early, mid-, and late part of the blooming period to ensure no threadleaved brodiaea was undetected. The focused surveys should be conducted according to CDFW's Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities (CDFW 2018). If custom home(s) are anticipated to be built more than three years following completion of the initial phase of construction, a subsequent focused survey should be conducted prior to development of the custom home(s).

Mitigation Measure #6: If take of thread-leaved brodiaea would occur from Project construction or operation, CESA authorization [(i.e., ITP)] would be required for the Project. CDFW may consider the Lead Agency’s CEQA documentation for its CESA-related actions if it adequately analyzes/discloses impacts and mitigation to CESA-listed species. Additional documentation may be required as part of an ITP application for the Project in order for CDFW to adequately develop an accurate take analysis and identify measures that would fully mitigate for take of CESA-listed species.

Comment #3: Impacts to Streams and Associated Riparian Communities Issue: The proposed Project will result in impacts to three main ephemeral drainages and DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-6
Cont.

S1-7
Item #8. Page 1467
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1532

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
associated coast live oak woodland.

Specific impacts: Project activities, which include demolishing the existing debris basins and installing new debris basins, will have an adverse impact on the drainages and associated coast live oak woodland. In addition to the debris basins, storm water will be diverted from the existing concrete-lined channel within the southern portion of the Project site to a new buried storm drain system.

Why impacts would occur: Based on the MND, the Project will result in direct impacts to 1.77 acres of streambed with associated coast live oak woodland and 0.28 acre of stream with nonriparian habitat. Project activities mentioned above will result in grading activities and discharge of fill that may potentially enter the stream. Moreover, excessive dust, stream bank erosion, and chemical pollution from machinery oil or fuels may also have an impact on the stream.

Furthermore, the riparian habitat consisting of coast live oak woodland is anticipated to be removed from the northern portion of Project site. Vegetation removal could also result in impacts to the bed, bank, and channel of a stream. Herbaceous vegetation adjacent to streams protects the physical and ecological integrity of these water features and maintains natural sedimentation processes. In addition to removal of a sensitive plant community and impacts to several drainages, the Project would permanently alter stormwater flow through the Project site by constructing and maintaining new roads and storm drains.

Additionally, mitigation measure BIO-6 proposes to mitigate direct impacts to 1.77 acres of streambed with associated coast live oak woodland at a 3:1 ratio and mitigate direct impacts to

0.28 acre of stream with non-riparian habitat at a 1:1 ratio. The MND does not disclose a justification as to why the proposed mitigation is sufficient to reduce the Project’s impacts to a level below significance. The streams and riparian habitat on site serve as important biological resources that allow wildlife to continue to thrive. CDFW is concerned that the mitigation proposed does not adequately offset the Project’s impacts to these valued biological resources.

Riparian habitats, such as coast live oak woodland, provide important food, nesting habitat, cover, and migration corridors for wildlife. Oak woodlands have higher levels of biodiversity than any other terrestrial ecosystem in California (CalPIF 2002). Oak woodlands also provide several important ecological functions within an ecosystem which include, but are not limited to, protecting soils from erosion and land sliding, regulating water flow in watersheds, and maintaining water quality in streams and rivers. Moreover, CDFW and the City of Glendora consider coast live oak woodlands to be a sensitive plant community, especially riparian oak woodland habitat. Not only does the coast live oak woodland play a crucial role in the ecosystem within the Project site, but ephemeral drainages also provide a water source for wildlife, especially after a rainfall event. Lastly, ephemeral drainages impose beneficial influences on the environment by supplying fresh water to perennial water, supplying nutrientrich soil downstream, and potentially replenishing groundwater tables (Vorste et al. 2020).

Evidence impacts would be significant: The Project may impact streams both during Project construction and for the Project’s lifetime. CDFW exercises its regulatory authority as provided by Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. to conserve fish and wildlife resources which includes rivers, streams, or lakes and associated natural communities. Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires any person, state or local governmental agency, or public utility to notify CDFW prior to beginning any activity that may do one or more of the following:
 Divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream, or lake; DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-7
Cont.

Item #8. Page 1468
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1533

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
 Change the bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake;  Use material from any river, stream or lake; or
 Deposit or dispose of material into any river, stream, or lake.

Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s):

Recommendation #3: CDFW’s issuance of an LSA Agreement for a project that is subject to CEQA will require CEQA compliance actions by CDFW as a Responsible Agency. As a Responsible Agency, CDFW may consider the CEQA document from the lead agency/project applicant for the project. To minimize additional requirements by CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. and/or under CEQA, a project’s CEQA document should fully identify the potential impacts to the stream or riparian resources and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, monitoring, and reporting commitments for issuance of the LSA Agreement.

To compensate for any on- and off-site impacts to aquatic and riparian resources, additional mitigation conditioned in any LSA Agreement may include the following: erosion and pollution control measures; avoidance of resources; protective measures for downstream resources; onand/or off-site habitat creation; enhancement or restoration; and/or protection and management of mitigation lands in perpetuity.

Mitigation Measure #7: The Project Applicant should mitigate for direct impacts to 1.77 acres of streambed with coast live oak woodland at a 4:1 mitigation ratio and streambed with nonriparian habitat at a 3:1 mitigation ratio. The Project Applicant should provide 7.08 acres of streambed with coast live oak woodland and 0.84 acre of streambed habitat. Mitigation should be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement dedicated to a local land conservancy or other appropriate entity that has been approved to hold and manage mitigation lands. An appropriate endowment should be provided for the long-term management of mitigation lands.

Mitigation Measure #8: The Project Applicant’s LSA notification to CDFW should provide the following information:
1) A stream delineation in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetland definition adopted by CDFW (Cowardin et al. 1979);
2) Linear feet and/or acreage of streams and associated natural communities that would be permanently and/or temporarily impacted by the Project. This includes impacts as a result of routine maintenance and fuel modification. Plant community names should be provided based on vegetation association and/or alliance per the Manual of California Vegetation, second edition (Sawyer et al. 2009);
3) A discussion as to whether impacts on streams within the Project site would impact those streams immediately outside of the Project site where there is hydrologic connectivity. Potential impacts such as changes to drainage pattern, runoff, and sedimentation should be discussed; and
4) A hydrological evaluation of the 100-year storm event to provide information on how water and sediment is conveyed through the Project site. Additionally, the hydrological evaluation should assess a sufficient range of storm events (e.g., 100, 50, 25, 10, 5, and 2-year frequency storm events) to evaluate water and sediment transport under preProject and post-Project conditions.

Please visit CDFW’s Lake and Streambed Alteration Program webpage for information about DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-7
Cont.

Item #8. Page 1469
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1534

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
LSA Notification and online submittal through the Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS) Permitting Portal (CDFW 2022c).

Comment #4: Impacts to Sensitive Plant Communities and Protected Trees Issue: The Project will impact sensitive upland vegetation communities.

Specific impacts: The Project would result in direct impacts to 7.71 acres of coast live oak woodland alliance, 0.91 acre of California sagebrush scrub, and 0.01 acre of California walnut grove. Project activities that will result in direct permanent impacts to coast live oak woodland and California sagebrush scrub entail grading and vegetation removal activities. In addition, 651 trees throughout the Project site will be removed.

Why impacts would occur: The Project will remove coast live oak woodland and California sagebrush scrub from the Project site. Removal of coast live oak woodland would allow for residential development. Removal of California sagebrush scrub in the northern portion of the site will allow for the installment of an access road. The California walnut grove will not be removed but will be temporarily impacted due to demolition and reconstruction of the debris basin directly south of the walnut grove. Regarding tree removal, 651 trees are to be removed from the entire Project site. Of the 651 trees, 455 trees are protected as they are part of the three sensitive plant communities. Removing more than half of the total trees within the Project site will result in permanent loss of habitat function. Alongside loss of habitat function, removing the trees may potentially result in permanent loss of habitat quality.

These sensitive plant communities play a vital role in the biodiversity and biological integrity of the Project site. Project activities involving removal of these plant communities will contribute to permanent and temporal loss of habitat for wildlife species that rely on these native plant communities. In addition, there is a longer reestablishment period for oak woodlands and higher risk of failure especially during periods of drought, which results in prolonged temporal loss of habitat. Similar to oak woodland, the BRTR states that California sagebrush scrub “…may take a number of years before this habitat type will reestablish, especially given the drought years preceding and following the 2014 Colby fire”. Permanent and temporal loss of these sensitive plant communities may result in adverse impacts to the 49 species observed on site and the overall ecosystem within the Project site.

Mitigation Measure BIO-4 proposes that coast live oak woodland alliance and California walnut grove will be mitigated for direct impacts at a 3:1 mitigation ratio. Additionally, the mitigation measure proposes to mitigate for direct impacts to California sagebrush scrub at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. Mitigation Measure BIO-7 proposes varying mitigation ratios for replacement of trees based on the City’s 2018 Urban Forestry Manual (City of Glendora 2018). The MND does not provide information that demonstrates why the mitigation ratios for both mitigation measures proposed are sufficient. Although these mitigation ratios may meet the minimum requirements per the City ordinance, it is unclear how they are sufficient to offset Project impacts. Lastly, the BRTR states that the Project applicant has the option to pay in-lieu fees for 879 replacement trees. In-lieu fees do not disclose how mitigation occurs, which may lead to unmitigated impacts, resulting in a net loss of trees, sensitive plant communities, and additional temporal impacts.

Evidence impacts would be significant: All three plant communities are considered protected per the Glendora Community Plan 2025 Conservation Element (City of Glendora 2008). In DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-7
Cont.

S1-8
Item #8. Page 1470
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1535

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
addition, the southern California black walnut is a tree species of local significance; a species of limited distribution; and a species that is moderately threatened in California with a rarity ranking of S3.2 (Sawyer et al. 2009). Southern California black walnut trees and California walnut groves meet the definition of endangered, rare, or threatened Species under CEQA (CEQA Guidelines, § 15380). Impacts to sensitive natural communities should be considered significant under CEQA unless they are clearly mitigated below a level of significance. Inadequate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures for impacts to these sensitive plant species will result in the Project continuing to have a substantial adverse direct, indirect, and cumulative effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on a plant community identified as sensitive by CDFW.

Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s):

Recommendation #4: The Project applicant should justify why the City’s mitigation ratios for replacement of trees are sufficient to reduce a Project’s impacts to a level less than significant.

It is understood that the mitigation ratios are based on diameter at breast height, but the final CEQA document should elaborate from a biological standpoint why these mitigation ratios are sufficient.

Recommendation #5: Mitigation for the proposed Project should be reevaluated to account for the considerable amount of time to reestablish these sensitive plant communities, the high number of trees removed, and the permanent and temporal loss of habitat.

Mitigation Measure #9: The Project Applicant should revise Mitigation Measure BIO-6 to mitigate for direct impacts to coast live oak woodland and California black walnut grove at a 4:1 mitigation ratio and California sagebrush scrub at a 2:1 mitigation ratio. The Project Applicant should provide 30.84 acres of coast live oak woodland, 0.04 acre of California walnut grove, and

1.82 acres of California sagebrush scrub. Mitigation should be implemented on site and/or through off-site restoration and preservation.

Mitigation Measure #10: Implementation for mitigation of upland sensitive vegetation communities should be outlined in Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP). The Project Applicant should submit a CRP to the City prior to the City issuing appropriate permits. Mitigation should entail the recreation or restoration of a functioning woodland and sagebrush scrub habitat of similar composition, structure, and function to natural communities that would be impacted.

Mitigation should include the restoration and/or recreation of structurally diverse native understory vegetation species (i.e., grass, forb, shrub, subshrub, vine) occurring in the impacted natural communities. Acorns and/or seedlings should originate from plants/trees of the same species (i.e., genus, species, subspecies, and variety) as the species impacted. The CRP should detail the following:
1) Species-specific planting methods (e.g., container or bulbs); 2) Planting schedule;
3) Irrigation schedule: long-term monitoring for at least 10 years, with a minimum of seven years without supplemental irrigation;
4) Measures to control exotic vegetation and protection from herbivory; 5) Measurable goals and success criteria for establishing self-sustaining populations (e.g., percent survival rate, absolute cover). Measurable success criteria should be based on present site/ habitat conditions and/or functional local woodlands and sagebrush scrub DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-8
Cont.

Item #8. Page 1471
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1536

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
habitat as reference sites;
6) Contingency measures should the success criteria not be met; 7) Adaptive management techniques, including replacement plants if necessary; 8) Identification of responsible entities; and
9) Annual reporting criteria and requirements.

Mitigation Measure #11: Mitigation should be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement dedicated to a CDFW approved entity and an appropriate endowment should be provided (see Mitigation Measure #5).

Comment #5: Tree Diseases, Pests, and Pathogens
Issue: The proposed Project will remove 651 trees which may potentially spread material infected with invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens.

Specific impacts: Tree removal during Project activities may spread invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens into areas not currently exposed to these stressors. This could result in additional loss of native trees and plant communities. Loss of additional trees may result in loss of foraging and perching habitat for small mammals, birds, and raptors.

Why impacts would occur: The Project may remove trees that could host diseases and pests.

One such pathogen is Phytophthora ramorum, which causes sudden oak death. Sudden oak death has become the most common cause of mortality of oak (Quercus genus) and other native trees (Phytosphere 2015). Mortality rates of oak trees are greater than 50 percent in some areas impacted by sudden oak death (Phytosphere 2012). Tree dieback can have cascading impacts on the habitat and ecosystem, particularly avian distribution and abundance (Monahan and Koenig 2006). Diseases such as sudden oak death can spread via equipment and transport of infected material. These fragments can be spread to new locations if equipment and tools are not disinfected or cleaned before moving to the next work location. Infected material that is transported off site for disposal may expose other trees and plant communities to pest and disease. Another pest is the polyphagous shot hole borer, which can live on many native tree species such as California sycamore (Platanus racemosa), willows (Salix genus), oaks, cottonwoods (Populus genus), and alders (Alnus genus) (Calinvasives 2021). These diseases could result in expediting the loss of oak woodlands, and other native trees and plant communities within and adjacent to a Project site.

Evidence impacts would be significant: The Project may have a substantial adverse effect on sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the CDFW. The Project may result in a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW that are dependent on woodlands susceptible to invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens.

Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s):

Mitigation Measure #12: Mitigation Measure BIO-7 states that a qualified arborist shall prepare a Tree Planting and Maintenance Plan prior to Project activities. The Tree Planting and Maintenance Plan should discuss and provide actions to prevent and minimize the spread of invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens including, but not limited to sudden oak death DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-8
Cont.

S1-9
Item #8. Page 1472
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1537

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
(Phytophthora ramorum), thousand canker fungus (Geosmithia morbida), polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea spp.), and goldspotted oak borer (Agrilus auroguttatus) (TCD 2021; UCANR 2021; Phytosphere Research 2012; UCIPM 2013). To avoid the spread of infectious tree pests and diseases, infected trees should not be transported from a Project site without first being treated using best available management practices outlined in the Tree Planting and Maintenance Plan.

Additional Recommendations
Nesting birds. The MND provides mitigation for nesting birds; however, the Project’s mitigation measure for nesting birds may be inadequate to reduce the Project’s impact on nesting birds to less than significant. CDFW recommends the City revise Mitigation Measure BIO-3 by incorporating the underlined language and removing the language that has strikethrough:

Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the migratory bird nesting season February 15 through September 15 (as early as January 1 for some raptors) (February 1 through August 31) in order to avoid any potential significant impact to birds and raptors that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, an avian nesting survey of the Project site and contiguous habitat within 500 feet of all Project-related impact areas shall be conducted for protected migratory birds and active nests. The avian nesting survey shall be performed by a qualified wildlife biologist, subject to the City’s approval, within 72 hours prior to the start of construction-related activity in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703–712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513.

If an active bird nest is found, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans along with an appropriate no disturbance buffer, which shall be determined by the qualified wildlife biologist based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance (minimum of 50 feet for common, urban-adapted species, 300 feet for other passerine species, and 500 feet for raptors, and 0.5 mile for special-status species). The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing and shall be avoided until the nest is vacated and the juveniles have fledged. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on nesting birds, sensitivity of the area, and adherence to the nodisturbance buffers. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work on the Project site and shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.

Bats. The Project’s mitigation measure for bats may be inadequate to reduce the Project’s impact on bats to less than significant. CDFW recommends the City revise Mitigation Measure BIO-4 by incorporating the underlined language and removing the language that has strikethrough:

Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the maternity roosting season (March 1 through September 30 August), in order to avoid any potential significant impact to bat maternity roosts. If construction activities must be initiated during the maternity roosting season, a roost survey must be conducted by a qualified bat specialist biologist, subject to the City’s approval. The roost survey for roosting bats shall be conducted on the Project site, including all trees and structures within 300 feet of Project-related DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-9
Cont.

S1-10
S1-11
Item #8. Page 1473
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1538

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
impact areas, and shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities.

If bats are not detected, but the bat specialist determines that roosting bats may be present at any time of year and could roost in trees at a given location, during tree pruning, trees should be pushed using heavy machinery prior to using a chainsaw for any limbing or trimming. To ensure the optimum warning for any roosting bats that may still be present, trees should be pushed lightly two or three times, with a pause of approximately 30 seconds between each nudge to allow bats to become active. A period of at least 24 hours, and preferable 48 hours, should elapse prior to such operations to allow bats to escape.

If maternity roosting is identified, work should be scheduled between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are yet ready to fly out of the roost (March 1 to September 30). those trees and/or occupied structures shall not be removed during the bat maternity roost season (March to August) and a minimum 300-foot buffer shall be established. The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes and the roost shall be monitored by a qualified biologist until roost is vacated and juveniles have fledged.

Landscaping. The Project proposes landscaping throughout the residential development.

CDFW recommends the Project Applicant use only native species found in naturally occurring vegetation communities within or adjacent to the Project site. The Project Applicant should not plant, seed, or otherwise introduce non-native, invasive plant species to areas that are adjacent to and/or near native habitat areas. Accordingly, CDFW recommends the City restrict use of any species, particularly those listed ‘Moderate’ or ‘High’ by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC 2022). These species are documented to have substantial and severe ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure.

Fencing. The Project proposes installing aesthetic fencing between the Project site and adjacent residential uses. CDFW recommends that any fencing used during and after the Project be constructed with materials that are not harmful to wildlife. Prohibited materials should include, but are not limited to, spikes, glass, razor, or barbed wire. Use of chain link and steel stake fence should be avoided or minimized as this type of fencing can injure wildlife or create barriers to wildlife dispersal. All hollow posts and pipes should be capped to prevent wildlife entrapment and mortality. These structures mimic the natural cavities preferred by various bird species and other wildlife for shelter, nesting, and roosting. Raptor’s talons can become entrapped within the bolt holes of metal fence stakes resulting in mortality. Metal fence stakes used on the Project site should be plugged with bolts or other plugging materials to avoid this hazard. Fences should not have any slack that may cause wildlife entanglement.

Data. CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database [i.e., California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)] which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations [Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e)]. Accordingly, please report any special status species detected by completing and submitting CNDDB Online Field Survey Form (CDFW 2022b). Information on special status native plant populations and sensitive natural communities, the Combined Rapid Assessment and Relevé Form should be completed and submitted to CDFW’s Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (CDFW 2022d). The City should ensure that the Project applicant has submitted data properly, with all data fields applicable filled out, prior to finalizing/adopting the environmental document. The data entry DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-11
Cont.

S1-12
S1-13
S1-14
Item #8. Page 1474
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1539

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
should also list pending development as a threat and then update this occurrence after impacts have occurred. The Project applicant should provide CDFW with confirmation of data submittal.

Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Plan. CDFW recommends updating the MND’s proposed Biological Resources Mitigation Measures to include mitigation measures recommended in this letter. Mitigation measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legally binding instruments [(Pub. Resources Code, § 21081.6; CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.4(a)(2)]. As such, CDFW has provided comments and recommendations to assist the City in developing mitigation measures that are (1) consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15126.4; (2) specific; (3) detailed (i.e., responsible party, timing, specific actions, location), and (4) clear for a measure to be fully enforceable and implemented successfully via mitigation monitoring and/or reporting program (Pub. Resources Code, § 21081.6; CEQA Guidelines, § 15097). The City is welcome to coordinate with CDFW to further review and refine the Project’s mitigation measures. Per Public Resources Code section 21081.6(a)(1), CDFW has provided the City with a summary of our suggested mitigation measures and recommendations in the form of an attached Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Plan (MMRP; Attachment A).

Filing Fees
The Project, as proposed, could have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the City of Glendora and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & Game Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089).

Conclusion
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Project to assist the City of Glendora in adequately analyzing and minimizing/mitigating impacts to biological resources. CDFW requests an opportunity to review and comment on any response that the City of Glendora has to our comments and to receive notification of any forthcoming hearing date(s) for the Project [CEQA Guidelines, § 15073(e)]. If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please contact Julisa Portugal, Environmental Scientist, at [email protected] or (562) 330-7563.

Sincerely,
Erinn Wilson-Olgin
Environmental Program Manager I
South Coast Region
ec: CDFW
Erinn Wilson-Olgin – Los Alamitos – [email protected] Victoria Tang – Los Alamitos – [email protected] Ruby Kwan-Davis – Los Alamitos – [email protected] Felicia Silva – Los Alamitos – [email protected] DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-14
Cont.

S1-15
S1-16
S1-17
Item #8. Page 1475
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1540

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
Frederic Rieman – Los Alamitos – [email protected] Cindy Hailey – San Diego – Cindy [email protected] CEQA Program Coordinator, Sacramento – [email protected] State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research - [email protected] References:

[CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2013. CDFW Departmental Bulletin.

Human/Wildlife Interactions in California: Mountain Lion Depredation, Public Safety, and Animal Welfare. Available from:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=68271&inline [CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2018. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities. Available at:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18959&inline [CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2020. Notice of Findings - Mountain Lion ESU declared a candidate species. Available from:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=178623&inline [CDFWa] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. Species of Special Concern.

Available at: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/SSC
[CDFWb] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. Submitting Data to the CNDDB.

Available at: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data [CDFWc] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. Lake and Streambed Alteration Program. Available at: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Environmental-Review/LSA [CDFWd] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. Natural Communities - Submitting Information. Available from: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP/NaturalCommunities/Submit [CDFWe] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Natural Diversity Database. Available at: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB [CalPIF] California Partners in Flight. 2002. Version 2.0. The oak woodland bird conservation plan: a strategy for protecting and managing oak woodland habitats and associated birds in California (S. Zack, lead author). Point Reyes Bird Observatory, Stinson Beach, CA. Available from: http://www.prbo.org/calpif/plans.html [CAL-IPC] California Invasive Plant Council. 2022. The Cal-IPC Inventory. Available from:
https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/inventory/
Calinvasives. 2021. Euwallacea nr. fornicatus - Polyphagous Shot Hole. Calflora. Available from: https://www.calflora.org/entry/pathogen.html?id=pth18 City of Glendora. 2008. Glendora Community Plan 2025 Conservation Element. Available at:
https://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7235/635193398301500 000
City of Glendora. 2018. City of Glendora Community Services Department Urban Forestry Manual. Available at:
https://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showpublisheddocument/23006/63661453543577 0000
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS79/31. Washington, D.C.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1476
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1541

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
[CWHR] California Wildlife Habitat Relationships. 2016. Mountain Lion Predicted Habitat – CWHR M165[ds2616]. Available from:
https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/ds2616.html?5.108.39
Ditmer, M.A., Stoner, D.C., Francis, C.D., Barber, J.R., Forester, J.D., Choate, D.M., Ironside, K.E., Longshore, K.M., Hersey K.R., Larsen, R.T., McMillan, B.R., Olson, D.D., Andreasen, A.M., Beckmann, J.P., Holton, P.B., Messmer, T.A., and Cater, N.H. 2020.

Artificial nightlight alters the predator-prey dynamics of an apex carnivore.

Ecography,43: 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05251 Lucas, E. 2020. Recreation-related disturbance to wildlife in California – better planning for and management of recreation are vital to conserve wildlife in protected areas where recreation occurs. California Fish and Wildlife, Recreation Special Issue 2020: 29-51.

Monahan, W.B. and W.D. Koenig. 2005. Estimating the potential effects of sudden oak death on oak-dependent birds. Biological Conservation 127:146-157.

Phytosphere Research. 2015. Phytophthora in nursery stock and restoration plantings.

Accessed at:
http://phytosphere.com/soilphytophthora/Issues_implications_Phytophthora_container_ stock.htm
Phytosphere Research. 2012. Understanding and Managing Sudden Oak Death in California.

Accessed at: http://phytosphere.com/SODmgtPUB/pg6Sidebar1-1SODmgntpub.htm Sawyer, J. O., Keeler-Wolf, T., and Evens J.M. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation, 2nd ed.

ISBN 978-0-943460-49-9.
[TCD] Thousand Cankers Disease. 2021. What is Thousand Cankers? Accessed at:
http://thousandcankers.com/
[UCANR] University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Division. 2021. Invasive Shot Hole Borers. Accessed at: https://ucanr.edu/sites/pshb/ [UCIPM] University of California Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. 2013. How to Manage Pests. Pests in Gardens and landscapes. Goldspottted Oak Borer. Accessed at: http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn74163.html
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Brodiaea filifolia (thread-leaved brodiaea) 5-Year Review. Available at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2570.pdf
Woodroffe, R. 2000. Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conservation 3:165-173.

Vorste, R., Sarremejane, R., and Datry, T. 2020. Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams: A Unique Biome With Important Contributions to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

Encyclopedia of the World’s Biomes. Elsevier. 419-429. Available from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124095489120548?via%3Dihub DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1477
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1542

State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director South Coast Region
3883 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 467-4201
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Attachment A: Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Plan CDFW recommends the following language to be incorporated into a future environmental document for the Project.

Biological Resources (BIO)
Mitigation Measure (MM) or Recommendation (REC) Timing Responsible Party
MM-BIO-1-
Mountain Lion
Incidential Take
Permit
If take or adverse impacts to mountain lion cannot be avoided, the Project Applicant shall consult with CDFW and obtain appropriate take authorization from CDFW (pursuant to Fish & Game Code, § 2080 et seq). The Project Applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures detailed in the take authorization issued by CDFW. The Project Applicant shall provide a copy of a fully executed take authorization prior to the issuance of a grading permit and before any ground disturbance and
vegetation removal.

Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities/
vegetation
removal
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-2 –
Mountain Lion
Habitat Mitigation
The Project Applicant shall offset the loss of mountain lion foraging habitat such that there is no net loss or at a ratio acceptable to CDFW. Mitigation proposed to offset loss of foraging habitat shall be disclosed in the final CEQA document.

The mitigation proposed shall also be justified as to how it would reduce the Project’s impact on mountain lion to less than significant. If the mitigation proposed is through off-site acquisition, the off-site habitat shall be similar in kind, as near to the Project site as possible, and protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement.

Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities/
vegetation
removal
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-3 –
Rodenticides
The Project Applicant shall prohibit use of any rodenticides and second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides on the property in perpetuity. The Project Applicant shall inform future
homeowners that no rodenticides and second-generation
Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities/
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-1
Item #8. Page 1478
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1543

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
anticoagulant rodenticides shall be used on site at any time as a condition of home build or purchase.
vegetation
removal
MM-BIO-4–
Prevention of
Human-Wildlife
Conflicts
To prevent human-wildlife conflicts within the Project site and to keep mountain lions wild, the Project Applicant shall incorporate the following elements into the design of the residential development, as well as management and maintenance of the residential residences in perpetuity:
 Never feed deer or other wildlife; it is illegal to feed deer and other big game in California and it will attract
mountain lions;
 Deer-proof landscaping by avoiding plants that deer like to eat;
 Trim brush to reduce hiding places for mountain lions;  Install motion-sensitive lighting around the residential development; and
 Increase site permeability through permeable fence
designs to limit physical obstructions to wildlife
movement.

The Project Applicant shall provide documentation and a plan with measures to prevent human-wildlife conflicts that shall be incorporated into the Project prior to the City issuing appropriate permits.

Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities and
prior to City
issuance of
permits
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-5- ThreadLeaved Brodiaea
Focus Surveys
The Project Applicant shall retain a qualified botanist with experience surveying for southern California rare plants to conduct focused surveys for the presence and/or absence of thread-leaved brodiaea within the Project site. The focused surveys shall be conducted during the early, mid-, and late part of the blooming period to ensure no thread-leaved brodiaea was undetected. The focused surveys shall be conducted according to CDFW's Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1479
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1544

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
Communities. If custom home(s) are anticipated to be built more than three years following completion of the initial phase of construction, a subsequent focused survey shall be conducted prior to development of the custom home(s).

MM-BIO-6-
Incidential Take
Permit
If take of thread-leaved brodiaea would occur from Project construction or operation, CESA authorization [(i.e., ITP)] shall be required for the Project. CDFW may consider the Lead Agency’s CEQA documentation for its CESA-related actions if it adequately analyzes/discloses impacts and mitigation to CESAlisted species. Additional documentation may be required as part of an ITP application for the Project in order for CDFW to adequately develop an accurate take analysis and identify measures that would fully mitigate for take of CESA-listed species.

Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-7-
Streambed
Mitigation
The Project Applicant shall mitigate for direct impacts to 1.77 acres of streambed with coast live oak woodland at a 4:1 mitigation ratio and streambed with non-riparian habitat at a 3:1 mitigation ratio. The Project Applicant shall provide 7.08 acres of streambed with coast live oak woodland and 0.84 acre of streambed with habitat. Mitigation shall be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement dedicated to a local land conservancy or other appropriate entity that has been approved to hold and manage mitigation lands. An appropriate endowment shall be provided for the long-term management of mitigation lands.

Prior to the
Project-related
ground-disturbing
activities and
vegetation
removal
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-8 –LSA
Notification
The Project Applicant’s LSA notification to CDFW shall provide the following information:
1) A stream delineation in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetland definition adopted by
CDFW (Cowardin et al. 1979);
2) Linear feet and/or acreage of streams and associated natural communities that would be permanently and/or
temporarily impacted by the Project. This includes
Prior to Projectrelated grounddisturbing
activities and
vegetation
removal
Project
Applicant
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1480
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1545

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
impacts as a result of routine maintenance and fuel
modification. Plant community names shall be provided
based on vegetation association and/or alliance per the Manual of California Vegetation, second edition (Sawyer et al. 2009);
3) A discussion as to whether impacts on streams within the Project site would impact those streams immediately outside of the Project site where there is hydrologic
connectivity. Potential impacts such as changes to
drainage pattern, runoff, and sedimentation shall be
discussed; and
4) A hydrological evaluation of the 100-year storm event to provide information on how water and sediment is
conveyed through the Project site. Additionally, the
hydrological evaluation shall assess a sufficient range of storm events (e.g., 100, 50, 25, 10, 5, and 2-year
frequency storm events) to evaluate water and sediment
transport under pre-Project and post-Project conditions.

MM-BIO-9 –
Sentive Plant
communities
Mitigation
The Project Applicant shall revise Mitigation Measure BIO-6 to mitigate for direct impacts to coast live oak woodland and California black walnut grove at a 4:1 mitigation ratio and California sagebrush scrub at a 2:1 mitigation ratio. The Project Applicant shall provide 30.84 acres of coast live oak woodland,

0.04 acre of California walnut grove, and 1.82 acres of California sagebrush scrub. Mitigation shall be implemented on site and/or through off-site restoration and preservation.

Prior to Projectrelated grounddisturbing
activities and
vegetation
removal
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-10 –
Conceptual
Restoration Plan
Implementation for mitigation of upland sensitive vegetation communities shall be outlined in Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP). The Project Applicant shall submit a CRP to the City prior to the City issuing appropriate permits. Mitigation shall entail the recreation or restoration of a functioning woodland and sagebrush scrub habitat of similar composition, structure, and function to natural communities that would be impacted.

Mitigation shall include the restoration and/or recreation of Prior to Projectrelated grounddisturbing
activities and
issuance of City
permits
Project
Applicant/
Qualified
Biologist
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1481
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1546

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
structurally diverse native understory vegetation species (i.e., grass, forb, shrub, subshrub, vine) occurring in the impacted natural communities. Acorns and/or seedlings shall originate from plants/trees of the same species (i.e., genus, species, subspecies, and variety) as the species impacted. The CRP shall detail the following:
1) Species-specific planting methods (e.g., container or bulbs);
2) Planting schedule;
3) Irrigation schedule: long-term monitoring for at least 10 years, with a minimum of seven years without
supplemental irrigation;
4) Measures to control exotic vegetation and protection from herbivory;
5) Measurable goals and success criteria for establishing self-sustaining populations (e.g., percent survival rate, absolute cover). Measurable success criteria shall be
based on present site/ habitat conditions and/or
functional local woodlands and sagebrush scrub habitat
as reference sites;
6) Contingency measures shall the success criteria not be met;
7) Adaptive management techniques, including
replacement plants if necessary;
8) Identification of responsible entities; and
9) Annual reporting criteria and requirements
MM-BIO-11 –
Conservation
Easement
Mitigation shall be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement dedicated to a CDFW approved entity and an
appropriate endowment shall be provided (see Mitigation Measure #5).

Prior to Projectrelated ground
disturbing
activities
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-12- Tree
Diseases
Mitigation Measure BIO-7 states that a qualified arborist shall prepare a Tree Planting and Maintenance Plan prior to Project activities. The Tree Planting and Maintenance Plan shall Prior to Projectrelated ground
City of
Glendora/
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1482
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1547

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
discuss and provide actions to prevent and minimize the spread of invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens including, but not limited to sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum), thousand canker fungus (Geosmithia morbida), polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea spp.), and goldspotted oak borer (Agrilus auroguttatus). To avoid the spread of infectious tree pests and diseases, infected trees shall not be transported from a Project site without first being treated using best available management practices outlined in the Tree Planting and
Maintenance Plan.
disturbing
activities and
during Project
implementation
Project
Applicant/
Qualified
Arborist
MM-BIO-13-
Nesting Birds
Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, shall avoid the migratory bird nesting season February 15 through September 15 (as early as January 1 for some raptors) in order to avoid any potential significant impact to birds and raptors that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, an avian nesting survey of the Project site and contiguous habitat within 500 feet of all Project-related impact areas shall be conducted for protected migratory birds and active nests. The avian nesting survey shall be performed by a qualified wildlife biologist, subject to the City’s approval, within 72 hours prior to the start of construction-related activity in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703– 712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503,
3503.5, and 3513.

If an active bird nest is found, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans along with an appropriate no disturbance buffer, which shall be determined by the qualified wildlife biologist based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance (minimum of 300 feet for passerine species, 500 feet for raptors, and 0.5 mile for special-status species). The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing and shall be avoided until the Prior to Projectrelated ground
disturbing
activities and
during Project
implementation
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant/
Qualified
Biologist
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1483
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1548

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
nest is vacated and the juveniles have fledged. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, shall be instructed on nesting birds, sensitivity of the area, and adherence to the no-disturbance buffers. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work on the Project site and shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.

MM-BIO-14- Bats
Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, shall avoid the maternity roosting season (March 1 through September 30), in order to avoid any potential
significant impact to bat maternity roosts. If construction activities must be initiated during the maternity roosting season, a roost survey must be conducted by a qualified bat specialist, subject to the City’s approval. The roost survey for roosting bats shall be conducted on the Project site, including all trees and structures within 300 feet of Project-related impact areas, and shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to
commencement of construction activities.

If bats are not detected, but the bat specialist determines that roosting bats may be present at any time of year and could roost in trees at a given location, during tree pruning, trees shall be pushed using heavy machinery prior to using a chainsaw for any limbing or trimming. To ensure the optimum warning for any roosting bats that may still be present, trees shall be pushed lightly two or three times, with a pause of approximately 30 seconds between each nudge to allow bats to become active. A period of at least 24 hours, and preferable 48 hours, shall relapse prior to such operations to allow bats to escape.

If maternity roosting is identified, work shall be scheduled between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are yet ready to fly out of the roost (March 1 to September 30).

Prior to Projectrelated ground
disturbing
activities and
during Project
implementation
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant/
Bat specialist
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1484
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1549

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
REC 1 – Mountain
Lion Disclosure
To improve the Project’s CEQA document, CDFW recommends the MND include a discussion regarding mountain lion’s special status under CESA. CDFW recommends the City discuss the Project’s potential impact on mountain lion from the standpoint of the following impacts:
1) Introducing new/additional barriers to dispersal (e.g., residential development);
2) Habitat loss and encroachment within Project site and surrounding areas;
3) Increased human presence, noise, and lighting; and
4) Use of herbicides, pesticides, and rodenticides.

Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
REC 2 – CEQA
Document for
Incidental Take
Permit
Revisions to the Fish and Game Code, effective January 1998, may require that CDFW issue a separate CEQA document for the issuance of an Incidental Take Permit for the Project unless the Project’s CEQA document addresses all the Project’s impact on CESA endangered, threatened, and/or candidate species. The Project’s CEQA document should also specify a mitigation monitoring and reporting program that will meet the requirements of an Incidental Take Permit. It is important that the take proposed to be authorized by CDFW’s Incidental Take Permit be described in detail in the Project’s CEQA document.

Also, biological mitigation monitoring and reporting proposals should be of sufficient detail and resolution to satisfy the requirements for an Incidental Take Permit. However, it is worth noting that mitigation for the Project’s impact on a CESA endangered, threatened, and/or candidate species proposed in the Project’s CEQA document may not necessarily satisfy mitigation required to obtain an Incidental Take Permit.

Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
REC 3 – CEQA
Document for LSA
CDFW’s issuance of an LSA Agreement for a project that is subject to CEQA will require CEQA compliance actions by CDFW as a Responsible Agency. As a Responsible Agency,
CDFW may consider the CEQA document from the lead
agency/project applicant for the project. To minimize additional requirements by CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game Code
Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1485
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1550

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
section 1600 et seq. and/or under CEQA, a project’s CEQA document should fully identify the potential impacts to the stream or riparian resources and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, monitoring, and reporting commitments for issuance of the LSA Agreement.

To compensate for any on- and off-site impacts to aquatic and riparian resources, additional mitigation conditioned in any LSA Agreement may include the following: erosion and pollution control measures; avoidance of resources; protective measures for downstream resources; on- and/or off-site habitat creation; enhancement or restoration; and/or protection and management of mitigation lands in perpetuity.

REC 4 – Mitigation
Ratio Justification
The Project applicant should justify why the City’s mitigation ratios for replacement of trees are sufficient to reduce a Project’s impacts to a level less than significant. It is understood that the mitigation ratios are based on diameter at breast height, but the final CEQA document should elaborate from a biological standpoint why these mitigation ratios are sufficient.

Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
REC 5 – Mitigation
Reevaluation
Mitigation for the proposed Project should be reevaluated to account for the considerable amount of time to reestablish these sensitive plant communities, the high number of trees removed, and the permanent and temporal loss of habitat.

Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
REC 6-
Landscaping
The Project proposes landscaping throughout the residential development. CDFW recommends the Project Applicant use
only native species found in naturally occurring vegetation communities within or adjacent to the Project site. The Project Applicant should not plant, seed, or otherwise introduce nonnative, invasive plant species to areas that are adjacent to and/or near native habitat areas. Accordingly, CDFW
recommends the City restrict use of any species, particularly those listed ‘Moderate’ or ‘High’ by the California Invasive Plant Council. These species are documented to have substantial and Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 Item #8. Page 1486
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1551

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora

July 29, 2022
severe ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure.

REC 7- Fencing
The Project proposes installing aesthetic fencing between the Project site and adjacent residential uses. CDFW recommends that any fencing used during and after the Project be
constructed with materials that are not harmful to wildlife.

Prohibited materials should include, but are not limited to, spikes, glass, razor, or barbed wire. Use of chain link and steel stake fence should be avoided or minimized as this type of fencing can injure wildlife or create barriers to wildlife dispersal.

All hollow posts and pipes should be capped to prevent wildlife entrapment and mortality. These structures mimic the natural cavities preferred by various bird species and other wildlife for shelter, nesting, and roosting. Raptor’s talons can become entrapped within the bolt holes of metal fence stakes resulting in mortality. Metal fence stakes used on the Project site should be plugged with bolts or other plugging materials to avoid this hazard. Fences should not have any slack that may cause wildlife entanglement.

Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
REC 8 – Data
Please report any special status species detected by completing and submitting CNDDB Online Field Survey Form. Information on special status native plant populations and sensitive natural communities, the Combined Rapid Assessment and Relevé
Form should be completed and submitted to CDFW’s
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program. The City should ensure that the Project Applicant has submitted the data properly, with all data fields applicable filled out, prior to finalizing/adopting the environmental document. The data entry should also list pending development as a threat and then update this occurrence after impacts have occurred. The Project Applicant should provide CDFW with confirmation of data submittal.

Prior to finalizing
CEQA document
City of
Glendora/
Project
Applicant
DocuSign Envelope ID: 08828EDD-A4BC-4BAE-B74D-58F100748D10 S1-1
Cont.

Item #8. Page 1487
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1552
Comment Letter L1
DOC 6638420.D22
July 25, 2022
Ref. DOC 6621217
Mr. Mark Carnahan, City Planner
Community Development Department
116 East Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, CA 91741
Dear Mr. Carnahan:

NOI Response to Grand Estates Project
The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (Districts) received a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the subject project on July 6, 2022. The proposed project is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of District No. 22. Previous comments submitted by the Districts to Giron Engineers, Inc. in correspondence dated April 6, 2018 (copy enclosed) still apply to the subject project with the following updated information:

1. Section 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems, Response to Question D, page 3-109: The response referenced the Districts’ Mesquite Regional Landfill (MRL). Please note that the use of the MRL is postponed; no waste has been accepted at the MRL. The Districts’ Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility, Downey Area Recycling and Transfer Facility, South Gate Transfer Station, Scholl Canyon Landfill, and Calabasas Landfill are open and accepting solid waste.

2. The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant located adjacent to the City of Industry, which has a capacity of 100 million gallons per day (mgd) and currently processes an average recycled flow of 62.7 mgd.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2743, or [email protected].

Very truly yours,
Mandy Huffman
Environmental Planner
Facilities Planning Department
MNH:mnh
Enclosure
L1-1
L1-2
L1-3
L1-4
Item #8. Page 1488
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1553

Item #8. Page 1489
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1554

Item #8. Page 1490
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1555
Comment Letter L2
L2-1
L2-2
Item #8. Page 1491
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1556

L2-3
L2-4
Item #8. Page 1492
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1557

L2-4
Cont.

L2-5
Item #8. Page 1493
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1558

L2-5
Cont.

L2-6
L2-7
Item #8. Page 1494
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1559
Comment Letter L3
L3-1
L3-2
L3-3
L3-4
L3-5
Item #8. Page 1495
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1560
Attachment L3-A
Guidelines for
Improvements and Construction Projects Proposed
in the Area of
Metropolitan’s Facilities and Rights-of-Way
July 2018
Prepared By:

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Substructures Team, Engineering Services
700 North Alameda Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Item #8. Page 1496
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1561

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018
Copyright © 2018 by The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

Additional Copies: To obtain a copy of this document, please contact the Engineering Services Group, Substructures Team.

Disclaimer
Metropolitan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the substructure information herein provided.

The user assumes responsibility for verifying substructure locations before excavating and assumes all liability for damage to Metropolitan’s facilities as a result of such excavation. Additionally, the user is cautioned to conduct surveys and other field investigations as deemed prudent, to assure that project plans are correct. The appropriate representative from Metropolitan must be contacted at least two working days, before any work activity in proximity to Metropolitan’s facilities.

It generally takes 30 days to review project plans and provide written responses. Metropolitan reserves the right to modify requirements based on case-specific issues and regulatory developments.

PUBLICATION HISTORY:

Initial Release July 2018
Item #8. Page 1497
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1562

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Table of Contents
Issue Date: July 2018

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................. 1

1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Submittal and Review of Project Plans/Utilities and Maps............................................ 1

1.3 Identification of Metropolitan’s Facilities and Rights-of-Way......................................... 3

2.0 General Requirements .................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Vehicular Access ......................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Fences......................................................................................................................... 3

2.3 Driveways and Ramps ................................................................................................. 3

2.4 Walks, Bike Paths, and Trails ...................................................................................... 3

2.5 Clear Zones ................................................................................................................. 4

2.6 Slopes.......................................................................................................................... 4

2.7 Structures .................................................................................................................... 4

2.8 Protection of Metropolitan Facilities ............................................................................. 4

2.9 Potholing of Metropolitan Pipelines .............................................................................. 4

2.10 Jacked Casings or Tunnels.......................................................................................... 4

3.0 Landscaping.................................................................................................................... 5

3.1 Plans............................................................................................................................ 5

3.2 Drought-Tolerant Native and California Friendly Plants................................................ 5

3.3 Trees ........................................................................................................................... 5

3.4 Other Vegetation.......................................................................................................... 6

3.5 Irrigation....................................................................................................................... 6

3.6 Metropolitan Vehicular Access..................................................................................... 6

4.0 General Utilities ............................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Utility Structures........................................................................................................... 6

4.2 Utility Crossings ........................................................................................................... 6

4.3 Longitudinal Utilities..................................................................................................... 7

4.4 Underground Electrical Lines ....................................................................................... 7

4.5 Fiber Optic Lines.......................................................................................................... 7

4.6 Overhead Electrical and Telephone Lines.................................................................... 7

4.7 Sewage Disposal Systems........................................................................................... 7

4.8 Underground Tanks ..................................................................................................... 8

5.0 Specific Utilities: Non-Potable Utility Pipelines................................................................. 8

6.0 Cathodic Protection/Electrolysis Test Stations................................................................. 8

6.1 Metropolitan Cathodic Protection ................................................................................. 8

6.2 Review of Cathodic Protection Systems....................................................................... 8

7.0 Drainage.......................................................................................................................... 9

7.1 Drainage Changes Affecting Metropolitan Rights-of-Way............................................. 9

7.2 Metropolitan’s Blowoff and Pumpwell Structures.......................................................... 9

8.0 Grading and Settlement................................................................................................... 9 Item #8. Page 1498
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1563

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Table of Contents
Issue Date: July 2018

8.1 Changes in Cover over Metropolitan Pipelines............................................................. 9

8.2 Settlement ................................................................................................................... 9

9.0 Construction Equipment .................................................................................................10

9.1 Review of Proposed Equipment..................................................................................10

9.2 Equipment Restrictions ...............................................................................................10

9.3 Vibratory Compaction Equipment................................................................................10

9.4 Equipment Descriptions ..............................................................................................10

10.0 Excavations Close to Metropolitan Facilities...................................................................11

10.1 Shoring Design Submittal............................................................................................11

10.2 Shoring Design Requirements ....................................................................................11

11.0 Support of Metropolitan Facilities....................................................................................11

11.1 Support Design Submittal ...........................................................................................11

11.2 Support Design Requirements ....................................................................................11

12.0 Backfill............................................................................................................................12

12.1 Metropolitan Pipeline Not Supported...........................................................................12

12.2 Metropolitan Pipeline Partially Exposed ......................................................................12

12.3 Metropolitan Cut and Cover Conduit on Colorado River Aqueduct (CRA)...................12

13.0 Piles ...............................................................................................................................13

13.1 Impacts on Metropolitan Pipelines ..............................................................................13

13.2 Permanent Cast-in-place Piles....................................................................................13

14.0 Protective Slabs for Road Crossings Over Metropolitan Pipelines ..................................13

15.0 Blasting ..........................................................................................................................13

16.0 Metropolitan Plan Review Costs, Construction Costs and Billing....................................14

16.1 Plan Review Costs......................................................................................................14

16.2 Cost of Modification of Facilities Performed by Metropolitan .......................................14

16.3 Final Billing .................................................................................................................14

17.0 Street Vacations and Reservation of Easements for Metropolitan ..................................14

18.0 Metropolitan Land Use Guidelines..................................................................................14

19.0 Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations..................................................15

20.0 Paramount Rights / Metropolitan’s Rights within Existing Rights-of-Way ........................17

21.0 Disclaimer and Information Accuracy .............................................................................17 Item #8. Page 1499
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1564

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Table of Contents
Issue Date: July 2018
Table 1: General Guidelines for Pipeline Separation between Metropolitan’s Pipeline1 and Sanitary Sewer2 or Hazardous Fluid Pipeline3
...........................................................18 Table 2: General Guidelines for Pipeline “Separation between Metropolitan’s Pipeline1 and Storm Drain and/or Recycled Water2 ........................................................................19 Table 3: General Guidelines for Pipeline “Separation1 between Metropolitan’s Pipeline and Recycled Water2,4 Irrigationsm,.................................................................................20 Figure 1: AASHTO H-20 Loading..............................................................................................21 Figure 2: Drawing SK-1.............................................................................................................22 Item #8. Page 1500
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1565

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018
This page is intentionally blank.

Item #8. Page 1501
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1566

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 1 of 22

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
Note: Underground Service Alert at 811 must be notified at least two working days before excavating in proximity to Metropolitan’s facilities.

1.1 Introduction
These guidelines provide minimum design and construction requirements for any utilities, facilities, developments, and improvements, or any other projects or activities, proposed in or near Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) facilities and rights-of-way. Additional conditions and stipulations may also be required depending on project and site specific conditions. Any adverse impacts to Metropolitan’s conveyance system, as determined by Metropolitan, will need to be mitigated to its satisfaction.

All improvements and activities must be designed so as to allow for removal or relocation at builder or developer expense, as set forth in the paramount rights provisions of Section 20.0. Metropolitan shall not be responsible for repair or replacement of improvements, landscaping or vegetation in the event Metropolitan exercises its paramount rights powers.

1.2 Submittal and Review of Project Plans/Utilities and Maps Metropolitan requires project plans/utilities be submitted for all proposed activities that may impact Metropolitan’s facilities or rights-of-way. Project plans shall include copies of all pertinent utilities, sewer line, storm drain, street improvement, grading, site development, landscaping, irrigation and other plans, all tract and parcel maps, and all necessary state and federal environmental documentation. Metropolitan will review the project plans and provide written approval, as it pertains to Metropolitan’s facilities and rights-of-way. Written approval from Metropolitan must be obtained, prior to the start of any activity or construction in the area of Metropolitan’s facilities or rights-of-way. Once complete project plans and supporting documents are submitted to Metropolitan, it generally takes 30 days to review and to prepare a detailed written response. Complex engineering plans that have the potential for significant impacts on Metropolitan’s facilities or rights-of-way may require a longer review time.

Project plans, maps, or any other information should be submitted to Metropolitan’s Substructures Team at the following mailing address:

Attn: Substructures Team
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
700 North Alameda St.

Los Angeles, CA 90012
General Mailing Address: P.O. Box 54153
Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153
Email: [email protected]
Item #8. Page 1502
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1567

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 2 of 22
For additional information, or to request prints of detailed drawings for Metropolitan’s facilities and rights-of-way, please contact Metropolitan’s Substructures Team at 213- 217-7663 or [email protected].

Item #8. Page 1503
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1568

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 3 of 22

1.3 Identification of Metropolitan’s Facilities and Rights-of-Way Metropolitan’s facilities and rights-of-way must be fully shown and identified as Metropolitan’s, with official recording data, on the following:

A. All applicable plans
B. All applicable tract and parcel maps
Metropolitan’s rights-of-ways and existing survey monuments must be tied dimensionally to the tract or parcel boundaries. Metropolitan’s Records of Survey must be referenced on the tract and parcel maps with the appropriate Book and Page.

2.0 General Requirements

2.1 Vehicular Access
Metropolitan must have vehicular access along its rights-of-way at all times for routine inspection, patrolling, operations, and maintenance of its facilities and construction activities. All proposed improvements and activities must be designed so as to accommodate such vehicular access.

2.2 Fences
Fences installed across Metropolitan’s rights-of-way must include a 16-foot-wide gate to accommodate vehicular access by Metropolitan. Additionally, gates may be required at other specified locations to prevent unauthorized entry into Metropolitan’s rights-of-way.

All gates must accommodate a Metropolitan lock or Knox-Box with override switch to allow Metropolitan unrestricted access. There should be a minimum 20-foot setback for gates from the street at the driveway approach. The setback is necessary to allow Metropolitan vehicles to safely pull off the road prior to opening the gate.

2.3 Driveways and Ramps
Construction of 16-foot-wide commercial-type driveway approaches is required on both sides of all streets that cross Metropolitan’s rights-of-way. Access ramps, if necessary, must be a minimum of 16 feet wide.

There should be a minimum 20-foot setback for gates from the street at the driveway approach. Grades of ramps and access roads must not exceed 10 percent; if the slope of an access ramp or road must exceed 10 percent due to topography, then the ramp or road must be paved.

2.4 Walks, Bike Paths, and Trails
All walkways, bike paths, and trails along Metropolitan’s rights-of-way must be a minimum 12-foot wide and have a 50-foot or greater radius on all horizontal curves if also used as Metropolitan’s access roads. Metropolitan’s access routes, including all walks and drainage facilities crossing the access routes, must be constructed to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) H-20 loading standards (see Figure 1). Additional requirements will be placed on equestrian trails to protect the water quality of Metropolitan’s pipelines and facilities.

Item #8. Page 1504
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1569

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 4 of 22

2.5 Clear Zones
A 20-foot-wide clear zone is required to be maintained around Metropolitan’s manholes and other above-ground facilities to accommodate vehicular access and maintenance.

The clear zone should slope away from Metropolitan’s facilities on a grade not to exceed 2 percent.

2.6 Slopes
Cut or fill slopes proposed within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way must not exceed 10 percent. The proposed grade must not worsen the existing condition. This restriction is required to facilitate Metropolitan use of construction and maintenance equipment and allow uninhibited access to above-ground and below-ground facilities.

2.7 Structures
Construction of structures of any type is not allowed within the limits of Metropolitan’s rights-of-way to avoid interference with the operation and maintenance of Metropolitan’s facilities and possible construction of future facilities.

Footings and roof eaves of any proposed buildings adjacent to Metropolitan’s rights-ofway must meet the following criteria:

A. Footings and roof eaves must not encroach onto Metropolitan’s rights-of-way.

B. Footings must not impose any additional loading on Metropolitan’s facilities.

C. Roof eaves must not overhang onto Metropolitan’s rights-of-way.

Detailed plans of footings and roof eaves adjacent to Metropolitan’s rights-of-way must be submitted for Metropolitan’s review and written approval, as pertains to Metropolitan’s facilities.

2.8 Protection of Metropolitan Facilities
Metropolitan facilities within its rights-of-way, including pipelines, structures, manholes, survey monuments, etc., must be protected from damage by the project proponent or property owner, at no expense to Metropolitan. The exact location, description and method of protection must be shown on the project plans.

2.9 Potholing of Metropolitan Pipelines
Metropolitan’s pipelines must be potholed in advance, if the vertical clearance between a proposed utility and Metropolitan’s pipeline is indicated to be 4 feet or less. A Metropolitan representative must be present during the potholing operation and will assist in locating the pipeline. Notice is required, a minimum of three working days, prior to any potholing activity.

2.10 Jacked Casings or Tunnels
A. General Requirements
Utility crossings installed by jacking, or in a jacked casing or tunnel under/over a Metropolitan pipeline, must have at least 3 feet of vertical clearance between the outside diameter of the pipelines and the jacked pipe, casing, or tunnel. The actual Item #8. Page 1505
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1570

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 5 of 22
cover over Metropolitan’s pipeline shall be determined by potholing, under Metropolitan’s supervision.

Utilities installed in a jacked casing or tunnel must have the annular space between the utility and the jacked casing or tunnel filled with grout. Provisions must be made for grouting any voids around the exterior of the jacked pipe, casing, or tunnel.

B. Jacking or Tunneling Procedures
Detailed jacking, tunneling, or directional boring procedures must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. The procedures must cover all aspects of operation, including, but not limited to, dewatering, ground control, alignment control, and grouting pressure. The submittal must also include procedures to be used to control sloughing, running, or wet ground, if encountered. A minimum 10-foot clearance must be maintained between the face of the tunneling or receiving pits and outside edges of Metropolitan’s facility.

C. Shoring
Detailed drawings of shoring for jacking or receiving pits must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and written-approval. (See Section 10 for shoring requirements).

D. Temporary Support
Temporary support of Metropolitan’s pipelines may be required when a utility crosses under a Metropolitan pipeline and is installed by means of an open trench. Plans for temporary support must be reviewed and approved in writing by Metropolitan. (See Section 11, Supports of Metropolitan Facilities).

3.0 Landscaping

3.1 Plans
All landscape plans must show the location and limits of Metropolitan’s right-of-way and the location and size of Metropolitan’s pipeline and related facilities therein. All landscaping and vegetation shall be subject to removal without notice, as may be required by Metropolitan for ongoing maintenance, access, repair, and construction activities. Metropolitan will not be financially responsible for the removal of any landscaping and vegetation.

3.2 Drought-Tolerant Native and California Friendly Plants Metropolitan recommends use of drought-tolerant native and California Friendly® plants (excluding sensitive plants) on proposed projects. For more information regarding California Friendly® plants refer to www.bewaterwise.com.

3.3 Trees
Trees are generally prohibited within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way as they restrict Metropolitan’s ability to operate, maintain and/or install new pipeline(s) located within these rights-of-way. Metropolitan will not be financially responsible for the removal and replacement of any existing trees should they interfere with access and any current or future Metropolitan project located within the right-of-way.

Item #8. Page 1506
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1571

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 6 of 22

3.4 Other Vegetation
Shrubs, bushes, vines, and groundcover are generally allowed within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way. Larger shrubs are not allowed on Metropolitan fee properties; however, they may be allowed within its easements if planted no closer than 15 feet from the outside edges of existing or future Metropolitan facilities. Only groundcover is allowed to be planted directly over Metropolitan pipeline, turf blocks or similar is recommended to accommodate our utility vehicle access. Metropolitan will not be financially responsible for the removal and replacement of the vegetation should it interfere with access and any current or future Metropolitan project.

3.5 Irrigation
Irrigation systems are acceptable within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way, provided valves and controllers are located near the edges of the right-of-way and do not interfere with Metropolitan vehicular access. A shutoff valve should also be located along the edge of the right-of-way that will allow the shutdown of the system within the right-of-way should Metropolitan need to do any excavation. No pooling or saturation of water above Metropolitan’s pipeline and right-of-way is allowed. Additional restrictions apply to nonpotable water such as Recycled Water and are covered on Table 3 of Page 20.

3.6 Metropolitan Vehicular Access
Landscape plans must show Metropolitan vehicular access to Metropolitan’s facilities and rights-of-way and must be maintained by the property owner or manager or homeowners association at all times. Walkways, bike paths, and trails within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way may be used as Metropolitan access routes. (See Section

2.4, Walks, Bike Paths, and Trails).

4.0 General Utilities
Note: For non-potable piping like sewer, hazardous fluid, storm drain, disinfected tertiary recycled water and recycled water irrigation see Table 1 through Table 3.

4.1 Utility Structures
Permanent utility structures (e.g., manholes, power poles, pull boxes, electrical vaults, etc.) are not allowed within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way. Metropolitan requests that all permanent utility structures within public streets be placed as far from its pipelines and facilities as practical, but not closer than 5 feet from the outside edges of Metropolitan facilities.

Note: Non-potable utility pipelines are an exception to the 5-foot minimum clearance.

Non-potable utility pipelines should have 10 feet of separation.

4.2 Utility Crossings
Metropolitan requests a minimum of 1 foot of vertical clearance between Metropolitan’s pipeline and any utility crossing the pipeline. Utility lines crossing Metropolitan’s pipelines must be as perpendicular to the pipeline as possible. Cross-section drawings, showing proposed locations and elevations of utility lines and locations of Metropolitan’s pipelines and limits of rights-of-way, must be submitted with utility plans, for all Item #8. Page 1507
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1572

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 7 of 22
crossings. Metropolitan’s pipeline must be potholed under Metropolitan’s supervision at the crossings (See Section 2.9).

4.3 Longitudinal Utilities
Installation of longitudinal utilities is generally not allowed along Metropolitan’s rights-ofway. Within public streets, Metropolitan requests that all utilities parallel to Metropolitan’s pipelines and appurtenant structures (facilities) be located as far from the facilities as possible, with a minimum clearance of 5 feet from the outside edges of the pipeline.

Note: Non-potable utility pipelines are an exception to the 5-foot minimum clearance.

Non-potable utility pipelines should have 10 feet of separation (for more information See Table 1 on Page 18).

4.4 Underground Electrical Lines
Underground electrical conduits (110 volts or greater) which cross a Metropolitan’s pipeline must have a minimum of 1 foot of vertical clearance between Metropolitan’s pipeline and the electrical lines. Longitudinal electrical lines, including pull boxes and vaults, in public streets should have a minimum separation of 5 feet from the edge of a Metropolitan pipeline or structures.

4.5 Fiber Optic Lines
Fiber optic lines installed by directional boring require a minimum of 3 feet of vertical clearance when boring is over Metropolitan’s pipelines and a minimum of 5 feet of vertical clearance when boring is under Metropolitan’s pipelines. Longitudinal fiber optic lines, including pull boxes, in public streets should have a minimum separation of 5 feet from the edge of a Metropolitan pipelines or structures. Potholing must be performed, under Metropolitan’s supervision, to verify the vertical clearances are maintained.

4.6 Overhead Electrical and Telephone Lines
Overhead electrical and telephone lines, where they cross Metropolitan’s rights-of-way, must have a minimum 35 feet of clearance, as measured from the ground to the lowest point of the overhead line. Overhead electrical lines poles must be located at least 30 feet laterally from the edges of Metropolitan’s facilities or outside Metropolitan’s rightof-way, whichever is greater.

Longitudinal overhead electrical and or telephone lines in public streets should have a minimum separation of 10 feet from the edge of a Metropolitan pipelines or structures where possible.

4.7 Sewage Disposal Systems
Sewage disposal systems, including leach lines and septic tanks, must be a minimum of 100 feet from the outside limits of Metropolitan’s rights-of-way or the edge of its facilities, whichever is greater. If soil conditions are poor, or other adverse site-specific conditions exist, a minimum distance of 150 feet is required. They must also comply with local and state health code requirements as they relate to sewage disposal systems in proximity to major drinking water supply pipelines.

Item #8. Page 1508
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1573

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 8 of 22

4.8 Underground Tanks
Underground tanks containing hazardous materials must be a minimum of 100 feet from the outside limits of Metropolitan’s rights-of-way or edge of its facilities, whichever is greater. In addition, groundwater flow should be considered with the placement of underground tanks down-gradient of Metropolitan’s facilities.

5.0 Specific Utilities: Non-Potable Utility Pipelines
In addition to Metropolitan’s general requirements, installation of non-potable utility pipelines (e.g., storm drains, sewers, and hazardous fluids pipelines) in Metropolitan's rights-of-way and public street rights-of-way must also conform to the State Water Resources Control Board’s Division of Drinking Water (DDW) regulation (Waterworks Standards) and guidance for separation of water mains and non-potable pipelines and to applicable local county health code requirements. Written approval is required from DDW for the implementation of alternatives to the Waterworks Standards and, effective December 14, 2017, requests for alternatives to the Waterworks Standards must include information consistent with: DDW’s Waterworks Standards Main Separation Alternative Request Checklist.

In addition to the following general guidelines, further review of the proposed project must be evaluated by Metropolitan and requirements may vary based on site specific conditions.

A. Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Fluids (General Guideline See Table 1 on Page 18) B. Storm Drain and Recycled Water (General Guideline See Table 2 on Page 19) C. Irrigation with Recycled Water (General Guideline See Table 3 on Page 20) D. Metropolitan generally does not allow Irrigation with recycled water to be applied directly above its treated water pipelines
E. Metropolitan requests copies of project correspondence with regulating agencies (e.g., Regional Water Quality Control Board, DDW); regarding the application of recycled water for all projects located on Metropolitan’s rights-of-way

6.0 Cathodic Protection/Electrolysis Test Stations

6.1 Metropolitan Cathodic Protection
Metropolitan’s existing cathodic protection facilities in the vicinity of any proposed work must be identified prior to any grading or excavation. The exact location, description, and type of protection must be shown on all project plans. Please contact Metropolitan for the location of its cathodic protection stations.

6.2 Review of Cathodic Protection Systems
Metropolitan must review any proposed installation of impressed-current cathodic protection systems on pipelines crossing or paralleling Metropolitan’s pipelines to determine any potential conflicts with Metropolitan’s existing cathodic protection system.

Item #8. Page 1509
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1574

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 9 of 22

7.0 Drainage

7.1 Drainage Changes Affecting Metropolitan Rights-of-Way Changes to existing drainage that could affect Metropolitan’s rights-of-way require Metropolitan’s approval. The project proponent must provide acceptable solutions to ensure Metropolitan’s rights-of-way are not negatively affected by changes in the drainage conditions. Plans showing the changes, with a copy of a supporting hydrology report and hydraulic calculations, must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. Long term maintenance of any proposed drainage facilities must be the responsibility of the project proponent, City, County, homeowner’s association, etc., with a clear understanding of where this responsibility lies. If drainage must be discharged across Metropolitan’s rights-of-way, it must be carried across by closed conduit or lined open channel and must be shown on the plans.

7.2 Metropolitan’s Blowoff and Pumpwell Structures
Any changes to the existing local watercourse systems will need to be designed to accommodate Metropolitan’s blowoff and pumpwell structures, which periodically convey discharged water from Metropolitan’s blowoff and pumping well structures during pipeline dewatering. The project proponents’ plans should include details of how these discharges are accommodated within the proposed development and must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. Any blowoff discharge lines impacted must be modified accordingly at the expense of the project proponent.

8.0 Grading and Settlement

8.1 Changes in Cover over Metropolitan Pipelines
The existing cover over Metropolitan’s pipelines must be maintained unless Metropolitan determines that proposed changes in grade and cover do not pose a hazard to the integrity of the pipeline or an impediment to its maintenance capability. Load and settlement or rebound due to change in cover over a Metropolitan pipeline or ground in the area of Metropolitan’s rights-of-way will be factors considered by Metropolitan during project review.

In general, the minimum cover over a Metropolitan pipeline is 4 feet and the maximum cover varies per different pipeline. Any changes to the existing grade may require that Metropolitan’s pipeline be potholed under Metropolitan’s supervision to verify the existing cover.

8.2 Settlement
Any changes to the existing topography in the area of Metropolitan’s pipeline or right-ofway that result in significant settlement or lateral displacement of Metropolitan’s pipelines are not acceptable. Metropolitan may require submittal of a soils report showing the predicted settlement of the pipeline at 10-foot intervals for review. The data must be carried past the point of zero change in each direction and the actual size and varying depth of the fill must be considered when determining the settlement. Possible settlement due to soil collapse, rebound and lateral displacement must also be included.

Item #8. Page 1510
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1575

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 10 of 22
In general, the typical maximum allowed deflection for Metropolitan’s pipelines must not exceed a deflection of 1/4-inch for every 100 feet of pipe length. Metropolitan may require additional information per its Geotechnical Guidelines. Please contact Metropolitan’s Substructures Team for a copy of the Geotechnical Guidelines.

9.0 Construction Equipment

9.1 Review of Proposed Equipment
Use of equipment across or adjacent to Metropolitan’s facilities is subject to prior review and written approval by Metropolitan. Excavation, backfill, and other work in the vicinity of Metropolitan’s facilities must be performed only by methods and with equipment approved by Metropolitan. A list of all equipment to be used must be submitted to Metropolitan a minimum of 30 days before the start of work.

A. For equipment operating within paved public roadways, equipment that imposes loads not greater than that of an AASHTO H-20 vehicle (see Figure 1 on Page 21) may operate across or adjacent to Metropolitan’s pipelines provided the equipment operates in non-vibratory mode and the road remains continuously paved.

B. For equipment operating within unpaved public roadways, when the total cover over Metropolitan’s pipeline is 10 feet or greater, equipment imposing loads no greater than those imposed by an AASHTO H-20 vehicle may operate over or adjacent to the pipeline provided the equipment is operated in non-vibratory mode. For crossings, vehicle path shall be maintained in a smooth condition, with no breaks in grade for 3 vehicle lengths on each side of the pipeline.

9.2 Equipment Restrictions
In general, no equipment may be used closer than 20 feet from all Metropolitan aboveground structures. The area around the structures should be flagged to prevent equipment encroaching into this zone.

9.3 Vibratory Compaction Equipment
Vibratory compaction equipment may not be used in vibratory mode within 20 feet of the edge of Metropolitan’s pipelines.

9.4 Equipment Descriptions
The following information/specifications for each piece of equipment should be included on the list:

A. A description of the equipment, including the type, manufacturer, model year, and model number. For example, wheel tractor-scraper, 1990 Caterpillar 627E.

B. The empty and loaded total weight and the corresponding weight distribution. If equipment will be used empty only, it should be clearly stated.

C. The wheel base (for each axle), tread width (for each axle), and tire footprint (width and length) or the track ground contact (width and length), and track gauge (center to center of track).

Item #8. Page 1511
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1576

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 11 of 22

10.0 Excavations Close to Metropolitan Facilities

10.1 Shoring Design Submittal
Excavation that impacts Metropolitan’s facilities requires that the contractor submit an engineered shoring design to Metropolitan for review and acceptance a minimum of 30 days before the scheduled start of excavation. Excavation may not begin until the shoring design is accepted in writing by Metropolitan.

Shoring design submittals must include all required trenches, pits, and tunnel or jacking operations and related calculations. Before starting the shoring design, the design engineer should consult with Metropolitan regarding Metropolitan’s requirements, particularly as to any special procedures that may be required.

10.2 Shoring Design Requirements
Shoring design submittals must be stamped and signed by a California registered civil or structural engineer. The following requirements apply:

A. The submitted shoring must provide appropriate support for soil adjacent to and under Metropolitan’s facilities.

B. Shoring submittals must include detailed procedures for the installation and removal of the shoring.

C. Design calculations must follow the Title 8, Chapter 4, Article 6 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) guidelines. Accepted methods of analysis must be used.

D. Loads must be in accordance with the CCR guidelines or a soils report by a geotechnical consultant.

E. All members must be secured to prevent sliding, falling, or kickouts.

Metropolitan’s pipelines must be located by potholing under Metropolitan’s supervision before the beginning construction. Use of driven piles within 20 feet of the centerline of Metropolitan’s pipeline is not allowed. Piles installed in drilled holes must have a minimum 2-foot clearance between Metropolitan’s pipeline and the edge of the drilled hole, and a minimum of 1-foot clearance between any part of the shoring and Metropolitan’s pipeline.

11.0 Support of Metropolitan Facilities

11.1 Support Design Submittal
If temporary support of a Metropolitan facility is required, the contractor shall submit a support design plan to Metropolitan for review and approval a minimum of 30 days before the scheduled start of work. Work may not begin until the support design is approved in writing by Metropolitan. Before starting design, the design engineer should consult with Metropolitan regarding Metropolitan’s requirements.

11.2 Support Design Requirements
Support design submittals must be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered civil or structural engineer. The following requirements apply:

Item #8. Page 1512
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1577

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 12 of 22
A. Support drawings must include detailed procedures for the installation and removal of the support system.

B. Design calculations must follow accepted practices, and accepted methods of analysis must be used.

C. Support designs must show uniform support of Metropolitan’s facilities with minimal deflection.

D. The total weight of the facility must be transferred to the support system before supporting soil is fully excavated.

E. All members must be secured to prevent sliding, falling, or kickouts.

12.0 Backfill

12.1 Metropolitan Pipeline Not Supported
In areas where a portion of Metropolitan pipeline is not supported during construction, the backfill under and to an elevation of 6 inches above the top of the pipeline must be one-sack minimum cement sand slurry. To prevent adhesion of the slurry to Metropolitan’s pipeline, a minimum 6-mil-thick layer of polyethylene sheeting or similar approved sheeting must be placed between the concrete support and the pipeline.

12.2 Metropolitan Pipeline Partially Exposed
In areas where a Metropolitan pipeline is partially exposed during construction, the backfill must be a minimum of 6 inches above the top of the pipeline with sand compacted to minimum 90 percent compaction.

12.3 Metropolitan Cut and Cover Conduit on Colorado River Aqueduct (CRA) In areas where a Metropolitan cut and cover conduit is exposed, the following guidelines apply:

A. No vehicle or equipment shall operate over or cross the conduit when the cover is less than 3 feet.

B. Track-type dozer with a gross vehicle weight of 12,000 lbs or less may be used over the conduit when the cover is a minimum of 3 feet.

C. Wheeled vehicles with a gross vehicle weight of 8,000 lbs or less may operate over the conduit when the cover is a minimum of 4 feet.

D. Tracked dozer or wheeled vehicle should be used to push material over the conduit from the side.

E. Tracked dozer or wheeled vehicle should gradually increase cover on one side of the conduit and then cross the conduit and increase cover on the other side of the conduit. The cover should be increased on one side of the conduit until a maximum of 2 feet of fill has been placed. The cover over the conduit is not allowed to be more than 2 feet higher on one side of the conduit than on the other side.

F. The cover should be gradually increased over the conduit until the grade elevations have been restored.

Item #8. Page 1513
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1578

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 13 of 22

13.0 Piles

13.1 Impacts on Metropolitan Pipelines
Pile support for structures could impose lateral, vertical and seismic loads on Metropolitan’s pipelines. Since the installation of piles could also cause settlement of Metropolitan pipelines, a settlement and/or lateral deformation study may be required for pile installations within 50 feet of Metropolitan’s pipelines. Metropolitan may require additional information per its Geo-technical Guidelines for pile installation. Please contact Metropolitan’s Substructures Team for a copy of the Geotechnical Guidelines.

13.2 Permanent Cast-in-place Piles
Permanent cast-in-place piles must be constructed so that down drag forces of the pile do not act on Metropolitan’s pipeline. The pile must be designed so that down drag forces are not developed from the ground surface to springline of Metropolitan’s pipeline.

Permanent cast-in-place piles shall not be placed closer than 5 feet from the edge of Metropolitan’s pipeline. Metropolitan may require additional information per its Geotechnical Guidelines for pile installation. Please contact Metropolitan’s Substructures Team for a copy of the Geotechnical Guidelines.

14.0 Protective Slabs for Road Crossings Over Metropolitan Pipelines Protective slabs must be permanent cast-in-place concrete protective slabs configured in accordance with Drawing SK-1 (See Figure 2 on Page 22).

The moments and shear for the protective slab may be derived from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The following requirements apply:

A. The concrete must be designed to meet the requirements of AASHTO B. Load and impact factors must be in accordance with AASHTO. Accepted methods of analysis must be used.

C. The protective slab design must be stamped and signed by a California registered civil or structural engineer and submitted to Metropolitan with supporting calculations for review and approval.

Existing protective slabs that need to be lengthened can be lengthened without modification, provided the cover and other loading have not been increased.

15.0 Blasting
At least 90 days prior to the start of any drilling for rock excavation blasting, or any blasting in the vicinity of Metropolitan’s facilities, a site-specific blasting plan must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. The plan must consist of, but not be limited to, hole diameters, timing sequences, explosive weights, peak particle velocities (PPV) at Metropolitan pipelines/structures, and their distances to blast locations. The PPV must be estimated based on a site-specific power law equation. The power law equation provides the peak particle velocity versus the scaled distance and must be calibrated based on measured values at the site.

Item #8. Page 1514
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1579

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 14 of 22

16.0 Metropolitan Plan Review Costs, Construction Costs and Billing

16.1 Plan Review Costs
Metropolitan plan reviews requiring 8 labor hours or less are generally performed at no cost to the project proponent. Metropolitan plan reviews requiring more than 8 labor hours must be paid by the project proponent, unless the project proponent has superior rights at the project area. The plan review will include a written response detailing Metropolitan’s comments, requirements, and/or approval.

A deposit of funds in the amount of the estimated cost and a signed letter agreement will be required from the project proponent before Metropolitan begins or continues a detailed engineering plan review that exceeds 8 labor hours.

16.2 Cost of Modification of Facilities Performed by Metropolitan Cost of modification work conducted by Metropolitan will be borne by the project proponent, when Metropolitan has paramount/prior rights at the subject location.

Metropolitan will transmit a cost estimate for the modification work to be performed (when it has paramount/prior rights) and will require that a deposit, in the amount of the estimate, be received before the work will be performed.

16.3 Final Billing
Final billing will be based on the actual costs incurred, including engineering plan review, inspection, materials, construction, and administrative overhead charges calculated in accordance with Metropolitan’s standard accounting practices. If the total cost is less than the deposit, a refund will be made; however, if the cost exceeds the deposit, an invoice for the additional amount will be forwarded for payment.

17.0 Street Vacations and Reservation of Easements for Metropolitan A reservation of an easement is required when all or a portion of a public street where Metropolitan facilities are located is to be vacated. The easement must be equal to the street width being vacated or a minimum 40 feet. The reservation must identify Metropolitan as a “public entity” and not a “public utility,” prior to recordation of the vacation or tract map. The reservation of an easement must be submitted to Metropolitan for review prior to final approval.

18.0 Metropolitan Land Use Guidelines
If you are interested in obtaining permission to use Metropolitan land (temporary or long term), a Land Use Form must be completed and submitted to Metropolitan for review and consideration.

A nonrefundable processing fee is required to cover Metropolitan’s costs for reviewing your request. Land Use Request Forms can be found at:
http://mwdh2o.com/PDF_Doing_Your_Business/4.7.1_Land_Use_Request_form_revised.pdf The request should be emailed to [email protected],or contact the Real Property Development and Management (RPDM) Group at (213) 217-7750.

Item #8. Page 1515
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1580

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 15 of 22
After the initial application form has been submitted, Metropolitan may require the following in order to process your request:

A. A map indicating the location(s) where access is needed, and the location & size (height, width and depth) of any invasive subsurface activity (boreholes, trenches, etc.).

B. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document(s) or studies that have been prepared for the project (e.g., initial study, notice of exemption, Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), etc.).

C. A copy of an ACORD insurance certification naming Metropolitan as an additional insured, or a current copy of a statement of self-insurance.

D. Confirmation of the legal name of the person(s) or entity(ies) that are to be named as the permittee(s) in the entry permit.

E. Confirmation of the purpose of the land use.

F. The name of the person(s) with the authority to sign the documents and any specific signature title block requirements for that person or any other persons required to sign the document (i.e., legal counsel, Board Secretary/Clerk, etc.).

G. A description of any vehicles that will have access to the property. The exact make or model information is not necessary; however, the general vehicle type, expected maximum dimensions (height, length, width), and a specific maximum weight must be provided.

Land use applications and proposed use of the property must be compatible with Metropolitan’s present and/or future use of the property. Any preliminary review of your request by Metropolitan shall not be construed as a promise to grant any property rights for the use of Metropolitan’s property.

19.0 Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations As a public agency, Metropolitan is required to comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations related to the activities it carries out or approves. Consequently, project plans, maps, and other information must be reviewed to determine Metropolitan’s obligations pursuant to state and federal environmental laws and regulations, including, but not limited to:

A. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000-21177) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 1500-15387)
B. Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq.

C. California Fish and Game Code Sections 2050-2069 (California ESA) D. California Fish and Game Code Section 1602
E. California Fish and Game Code Sections 3511, 4700, 5050 and 5515 (California fully protected species)
F. Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-712 G. Federal Clean Water Act (including but not limited to Sections 404 and 401) 33 U.S.C. §§ 1342, 1344)
Item #8. Page 1516
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1581

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 16 of 22
H. Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1969, California Water Code §§ 13000- 14076.

I. Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards), Section 64572 (Water Main Separation)
Metropolitan may require the project applicant to pay for any environmental review, compliance and/or mitigation costs incurred to satisfy such legal obligations.

Item #8. Page 1517
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1582

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 17 of 22

20.0 Paramount Rights / Metropolitan’s Rights within Existing Rightsof-Way Facilities constructed within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way shall be subject to the paramount right of Metropolitan to use its rights-of-way for the purpose for which they were acquired. If at any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the exercise of their rights, find it necessary to remove or relocate any facilities from its rights-of-way, such removal and replacement or relocation shall be at the expense of the owner of the facility.

21.0 Disclaimer and Information Accuracy
Metropolitan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the substructure information herein provided. The user assumes responsibility for verifying substructure locations before excavating and assumes all liability for damage to Metropolitan’s facilities as a result of such excavation.

Additionally, the user is cautioned to conduct surveys and other field investigations as you may deem prudent, to assure that your project plans are correct. The relevant representative from Metropolitan must be called at least two working days, before any work activity in proximity to Metropolitan’s facilities.

It generally takes 30 days to review project plans and provide written responses. Metropolitan reserves the right to modify requirements based on case-specific issues and regulatory developments.

Item #8. Page 1518
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1583

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 18 of 22
Table 1: General Guidelines for Pipeline Separation between Metropolitan’s Pipeline1 and Sanitary Sewer2 or Hazardous Fluid Pipeline3
Pipeline Crossings Metropolitan requires that sanitary sewer and hazardous fluid pipelines that cross Metropolitan’s pipelines have special pipe construction (no joints) and secondary containment4
. This is required
for the full width of Metropolitan’s rights-of-way or within 10 feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropolitan’s pipeline within public streets. Additionally, sanitary sewer and hazardous fluid pipelines crossing Metropolitan’s pipelines must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum 1-foot vertical clearance between the top and the bottom of Metropolitan’s pipeline and the pipe casing.

These requirements apply to all sanitary sewer crossings regardless if the sanitary sewer main is located below or above Metropolitan’s pipeline.

Parallel Pipeline Metropolitan generally does not permit the installation of longitudinal pipelines along its rights-of-way. Within public streets, Metropolitan requires that all parallel sanitary sewer, hazardous fluid pipelines and/or non-potable utilities be located a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of Metropolitan’s pipelines. When 10-foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, longitudinal pipelines require special pipe construction (no joints) and secondary containment4 .

Sewer Manhole Sanitary sewer manholes are not allowed within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way. Within public streets, Metropolitan requests manholes parallel to its pipeline be located a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of its pipelines. When 10 foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, the structure must have secondary containment5
.

Notes:
1 Separation distances are measured from the outer edges of each pipe. 2 Sanitary sewer requirements apply to all recycled water treated to less than disinfected tertiary recycled water (disinfected secondary recycled water or less). Recycled water definitions are included in Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 (Water Recycling Criteria), Section 60301. 3 Hazardous fluids include e.g., oil, fuels, chemicals, industrial wastes, wastewater sludge, etc. 4 Secondary Containment for Pipeline - Secondary containment consists of a continuous pipeline sleeve (no joints).

Examples acceptable to Metropolitan include welded steel pipe with grout in annular space and cathodic protection (unless coated with non-conductive material) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with fusion-welded joints. 5 Secondary Containment for Structures – Secondary containment consists of external HDPE liner or other approved method.

Item #8. Page 1519
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1584

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 19 of 22
Table 2: General Guidelines for Pipeline Separation between Metropolitan’s Pipeline1 and Storm Drain and/or Disinfected Tertiary Recycled Water2 Pipeline Crossings Metropolitan requires crossing pipelines to be special pipe construction (no joints) or have secondary containment3 within 10-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropolitan’s pipeline.

Additionally, pipelines crossing Metropolitan’s pipelines must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum 1-foot vertical clearance.

Parallel Pipeline Metropolitan generally does not permit the installation of longitudinal pipelines along its rights-of-way. Within public streets, Metropolitan requests that all parallel pipelines be located a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of
Metropolitan’s pipelines. When 10-foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, special pipe construction (no joints) or secondary containment3 are required.

Storm Drain
Manhole
Permanent utility structures (e.g., manhole. catch basin, inlets) are not allowed within Metropolitan’s rights-of-way. Within public streets, Metropolitan requests all structures parallel to its pipeline be located a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of its pipelines. When 10 foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, the structure must have secondary containment4
.

Notes:
1 Separation distances are measured from the outer edges of each pipe. 2 Disinfected tertiary recycled water as defined in Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 (Water Recycling Criteria), Section 60301.
3 Secondary Containment for Pipeline - Secondary containment consists of a continuous pipeline sleeve (no joints).

Examples acceptable to Metropolitan include welded steel pipe with grout in annular space and cathodic protection (unless coated with non-conductive material) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with fusion-welded joints. 4 Secondary Containment for Structures – Secondary containment consists of external HDPE liner or other approved method.

Item #8. Page 1520
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1585

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 20 of 22
Table 3: General Guidelines for Pipeline Separation1 between Metropolitan’s Pipeline and Recycled Water2,4 Irrigations
Pressurized recycled
irrigation mainlines • Crossings - must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum 1-foot vertical clearance. Crossing pressurized recycled irrigation mainlines must be special pipe construction (no joints) or have secondary containment3 within 10-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropolitan’s pipeline.
• Longitudinal - must maintain a minimum 10-foot horizontal separation and route along the perimeter of Metropolitan’s rightsof-way where possible.

Intermittently
Energized Recycled
Water Irrigation
System Components
• Crossings - must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum 1-foot vertical clearance. Crossing irrigation laterals within 5-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropolitan’s pipeline must be special pipe construction (no joints) or have secondary containment3 .
• Longitudinal – must maintain a minimum 5-foot horizontal separation between all intermittently energized recycled water irrigation system components (e.g. irrigation lateral lines, control valves, rotors) and the outer edges of Metropolitan’s pipeline.

Longitudinal irrigation laterals within 5-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropolitan’s pipeline must be special pipe construction (no joints) or have secondary containment3
.

Irrigation Structures Irrigation structures such as meters, pumps, control valves, etc. must be located outside of Metropolitan’s rights-of-way.

Irrigation spray rotors
near Metropolitan’s
aboveground facilities
Irrigation spray rotors must be located a minimum of 20-foot from any Metropolitan above ground structures with the spray direction away from these structures. These rotors should be routinely maintained and adjusted as necessary to ensure no over-spray into 20-foot clear zones.

Irrigations near open
canals and aqueducts
Irrigation with recycled water near open canals and aqueducts will require a setback distance to be determined based on site-specific conditions. Runoff of recycled water must be contained within an approved use area and not impact Metropolitan facilities.

Appropriate setbacks must also be in place to prevent overspray of recycled water impacting Metropolitan’s facilities.

Notes:
1 Separation distances are measured from the outer edges of each pipe. 2 Requirements for recycled water irrigation apply to all levels of treatment of recycled water for non-potable uses.

Recycled water definitions are included in Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 (Water Recycling Criteria), Section 60301.
3 Secondary Containment for Pipeline - Secondary containment consists of a continuous pipeline sleeve (no joints).

Examples acceptable to Metropolitan include welded steel pipe with grout in annular space and cathodic protection (unless coated with non-conductive material) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with fusion-welded joints. 4 Irrigation with recycled water shall not be applied directly above Metropolitan’s treated water pipelines.

Item #8. Page 1521
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1586

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 21 of 22
Figure 1: AASHTO H-20 Loading
Note: The H loadings consist of a two-axle truck or the corresponding lane loadings as illustrated above. The H loadings are designated “H” followed by a number indicating the gross weight in tons of the standard truck.

Item #8. Page 1522
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1587

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Issue Date: July 2018 Page 22 of 22
Figure 2: Drawing SK-1
Item #8. Page 1523
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1588
Comment Letter I1
I1-1
I1-2
I1-3
I1-4
Item #8. Page 1524
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1589
Attachment I1-A
Item #8. Page 1525
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1590

Item #8. Page 1526
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1591

Item #8. Page 1527
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1592
Attachment I1-B
Item #8. Page 1528
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1593

Item #8. Page 1529
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1594

Item #8. Page 1530
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1595
Attachment I1-C
Item #8. Page 1531
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1596

Item #8. Page 1532
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1597
Attachment I1-D
Item #8. Page 1533
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1598

Item #8. Page 1534
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1599
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 1
Responses to Comments
The focus of the responses to comments is on the disposition of significant environmental issues raised in the comments, as specified by Section 15088(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

When a comment is not directed to significant environmental issues, the responses indicate that the comment has been acknowledged and no further response is necessary.

List of Commenters
During the public review period, a total of 6 comment letters were received on the Draft MND. The comment letters have been categorized by sender (e.g., federal agency, state agency, local agency, and individual) and assigned a unique letter-number designation based on category.

The list of commenters and the unique letter-number designators for each letter are shown in Table RTC-1, List of Commenters. Individual comments within each letter are bracketed and subsequently numbered in the right-hand margin of the comment letter. Bracketed/numbered comment letters are placed before the responses to the letter.

Table RTC-1. List of Commenters
Commenter Letter No.

Federal Agency
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) F-1
State Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) S-1
Local Agency
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts L-1
County of Los Angeles Fire District L-2
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California L-3
Individuals
Sylvia Barton I-1
Item #8. Page 1535
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1600
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 2

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 1536
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1601
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 3
Federal Agencies
Response to Comment Letter 1
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
August 8, 2022
F1-1 The City acknowledges the comment as an introduction to comments that follow.

F1-2 The comment provides background information pertaining to the role the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) plays in the welfare of wildlife and plants species in the United States as well as its role in administering the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

F1-3 The comment provides a description of the proposed Project.

F1-4 The comment is an introduction to comments that follow.

F1-5 Section 7.5, Impact BIO-5: City of Glendora Protected Trees, of the Draft Biological Resources Technical Report (Draft BRTR), states that in accordance with the City’s 2018 Urban Forest Manual, any protected trees that will be removed as a result of the Project will be replaced at a minimum replacement ration of 1:1 and a maximum of 7:1 depending on the characteristics of the removed trees. For protected trees that are not replaced on-site, replacement shall be executed per the Condition of Approval and approved by the City Arborist. Additionally, Section 7.2, Impact BIO-2:

Sensitive Vegetation Communities, of the Draft BRTR states that impacts to sensitive vegetation communities as a result of the Project will be mitigated through on-site preservation, off-site acquisition, and/or mitigation bank credits. Impacts to upland woodlands would be mitigated at a ratio of no less than 3:1 and impacts to California sagebrush scrub would be mitigated at a ratio of no less than 1:1.

While the Project does have the potential to result in impacts to on-site oak woodlands and native vegetation, mitigation measures would offset these impacts both on and off-site. Therefore, these impacts are considered temporary.

F1-6 As stated in Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the Draft MND, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) has requirements for erosion control structures and sediment retention structures, to reduce the amount of sediment leaving the Project site in stormwater runoff. As such, the final design and construction of the proposed debris containment structures would be conducted in accordance with LACDPW’s Sedimentation Manual. The capacities of the proposed debris containment structures have been designed to exceed the potential debris production from upstream areas. As such, the proposed flood/debris control infrastructure have been designed for specific sediment retention estimates to be sufficient to contain debris flow from the Project site and downstream waters, and reducing the footprint could reduce the capability of the retention structures.

F1-7 As stated in the Draft BRTR, California sagebrush scrub alliance (one of the many scrub alliances that compose coastal sage scrub) has a rank that indicates that it is globally secure and secure in Item #8. Page 1537
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1602
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 4
the state. Although this alliance is not considered a special-status vegetation community by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), coastal sage scrub habitats are recognized as a special-status vegetation community by the City of Glendora. As such, per MM-BIO-4 of the Draft MND, impacts to California sagebrush scrub would be mitigated at a ratio of no less than 1:1.

F1-8 Per MM-BIO-4 of the Draft MND, impacts to California sagebrush scrub would be mitigated at a ratio of no less than 1:1 and onsite restoration is included as an option, including in the upland temporary impact areas.

F1-9 The biologist that conducted the rare plant surveys has extensive experience with the threadleaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) due to work on the Gordon Mull and Gordon Highlands developments in Glendora (California Natural Diversity Database Occurrence Number 123). As stated in Section 2.2.1 (On-Site Conditions) of the Draft MND, development has previously occurred on the Project site beginning around 1907 and included orchards and a Girl Scout camp in the southern portion of the Project site. As such, it is expected that this area that has seen anthropogenic uses for over 100 years would not support the habitat conditions required by the species in the Draft BRTR due to the removal of the natural vegetation communities and the alteration of the soil. As stated in the Draft BRTR, the northern portions of the Project site have been converted from relatively dense coastal sage scrub communities to California annual grassland following the 2014 Colby fire. The northern portion of the Project site also consists of steep slopes. Critical habitat for the species was designated by USFWS per habitats that provide space for growth and persistence of the species. These areas include: (1) with combinations of appropriate elevation and clay or clay-associated soils, on mesas or low to moderate slopes that support open native or annual grasslands within open coastal sage scrub or coastal sage scrubchaparral communities; (2) in floodplains or in association with vernal pool or playa complexes that support various grassland, scrub, or riparian herb communities; (3) on soils derived from olivine basalt lava flows on mesas and slopes that support vernal pools within grassland, oak woodland, or savannah communities; or (4) on sandy loam soils derived from basalt and granodiorite parent material with deposits of cobbles and boulders supporting intermittent seeps, and open marsh communities1. None of these habitats are found on the Project site and, per the Draft BRTR, the species was not observed during rare plant survey or other surveys of the Project site. As such, the species is not expected to occur on the Project site and no further surveys are required.

F1-10 As stated in Appendix D of the Draft BRTR, Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astragalus brauntonii) the species distribution is very limited in the San Gabriel Mountains (Monrovia Canyon). USFWS determined that the primary constituent elements for the species are: (1) Calcium carbonate soils derived from marine sediment; (2) Low proportion (<10%) of shrub cover directly around the plant; and (3) Chaparral and coastal sage scrub communities characterized by periodic disturbances that stimulate seed germination (e.g., fire, flooding, erosion) and reduce vegetative cover2. The Project site lacks the first two elements and the focused special-status plant species surveys were conducted following the Colby Fire, which should have provided seed germination if present; 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Revised Critical Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia (Thread-Leaved Brodiaea). 76 Fed. Reg. 6848, 6925 (February 8, 2011) 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Astragalus brauntonii and Pentachaeta lyonii. 74 66374, 66423 (November 14, 2006) Item #8. Page 1538
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1603
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 5
however, this conspicuous perennial herb was not observed. Therefore, the species is not expected to occur on the Project site and no further surveys are required..

F1-11 San Gabriel chestnut snail (Glyptostoma gabrielense) is not listed under the state or federal Endangered Species Acts, not a candidate species for listing, and very little scientific literature is available about the natural history of it. The known locations of where the snail have been found3 within the past 50 years are associated with large canyons with substantial drainages that are not present on site. As such, focused surveys are not warranted.

F1-12 Comment noted. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.
3 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. RareFind 5; queried for Glyptostoma gabrielense. Biogeographic Data Branch.

Sacramento, California: California Natural Diversity Database. Accessed February 2022. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/rarefind/view/RareFind.aspx.

Item #8. Page 1539
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1604
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 6

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 1540
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1605
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 7
State Agencies
Response to Comment Letter S1
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
July 29, 2022
S1-1 The City acknowledges the comment as an introduction to comments that follow.

S1-2 This comment explains CDFW’s role as a Trustee Agency. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

S1-3 The comment provides a description of the proposed Project and it’s location. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

S1-4 The City acknowledges the comment as an introduction to comments that follow.

S1-5 As stated in the Draft BRTR, nocturnal patterns of movement and stasis suggest that mountain lions generally avoid areas with human disturbance (i.e., residential developments and two-lane paved roads)4. Females keep their young in dens located in rocky terrain or in dense vegetation that provide cover but avoid roads and stay at a distance from human disturbance four times greater (approximately 600 meters) than non-reproductive mountain lions4. The project is located adjacent to residential neighborhoods to the east, south, and west, which have associated human presence. As such, mountain lion use of the project site is expected to be limited to transient movement that would either be hindered by the adjacent development or could lead human-wildlife interactions that could lead to mortalities.

The comment also states that due to the project location, human presence and food waste could attract bears and mountain lions to the site, thus increasing the threat of human-wildlife interface. The project is located adjacent to residential neighborhoods to the east, south, and west, which have associated human presence and potential for food waste that could already lead to human-wildlife interactions, including mountain lion. As such, project construction and the long-term residential housing would not create a substantial increase in the potential of human-wildlife interactions based upon the existing use of the adjacent areas by humans.

As stated in the comment, mountain lions are exceptionally vulnerable to human disturbance, with areas of high human activity having lower occupancy of rare carnivores. Mountain lions tend to avoid roads and trails by the mere presence of those features, regardless of how much they are used. Based upon CDFW’s own discussion, the Project site is expected to have little value to mountain lion due to the existing residential development and roads. As such, direct take of mountain lion is not expected and the loss of the habitat within the Project site is not expected to provide a higher value than the undeveloped lands to the north of the Project, so the loss of foraging habitat would not be significant. 4 Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation. 2019. A Petition to List the Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of Mountain Lions as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Accessed January 2021. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=171208&inline.

Item #8. Page 1541
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1606
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 8
It would be expected the highly mobile prey of mountain lion (e.g., mule deer, desert cottontail, etc.) that may be found on the Project would move into the adjacent open space areas and would still be available prey for mountain lion. As such, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) and compensatory mitigation for the loss of foraging habitat is not warranted.

S1-6 Please see response F1-9. Suitable habitat for the thread-leaved brodiaea is not present and the species was not observed during focus surveys for it. As such, an ITP for the species is not warranted.

S1-7 As stated in the Draft MND, MM-BIO-4 and MM-BIO-6 provides for adequate compensation for impacts to jurisdictional waters and associated habitat by providing onsite creation and restoration, and offsite preservation at 3:1. The City acknowledges that the Project will require a Streambed Alteration Agreement issued by CDFW that may include higher ratios for compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams and associated riparian habitat under the jurisdictional of the agency per California Fish and Game Code 1600-1616.

S1-8 As stated in the Draft BRTR, coast live oak woodland alliance is ranked by the CDFW as a G5S4 alliance5. This ranking indicates that globally the alliance is widespread, abundant, and is considered secure and within California the alliance is apparently secure. At the association scale, the onsite community would be recognized as a Quercus agrifolia association based upon the species being only exclusively found in the tree canopy, which CDFW does not recognize as sensitive6. Although this alliance is not considered a special-status vegetation community by CDFW, woodlands are recognized as special-status vegetation community by the City of Glendora (2006). As such, the proposed 3:1 mitigation ratio in the Draft MND would be sufficient to adequately compensate for the loss of a community not recognized by CDFW as sensitive.

As stated in the Draft BRTR, California sagebrush scrub alliance has a rank of G5S5, meaning it is globally secure and secure in the state5. Although this alliance is not considered a special-status vegetation community by CDFW (2022b), coastal sage scrub habitats are recognized as a specialstatus vegetation community by the City of Glendora (2006). As such, the proposed 1:1 mitigation ratio in the Draft MND would be sufficient to adequately compensate for the loss of a community not recognized by CDFW as sensitive.

As stated in the Draft MND, the temporary impacts to 0.01 acres of California walnut grove would be sufficiently be mitigated through MM-BIO-4, which calls for 3:1 replacement. If onsite replacement occurs, MM-BIO-4 already calls for a Conceptual Restoration Plan that requires at a minimum a monitoring schedule, minimum performance standard of success, estimated costs, and identification of responsible entities.

S1-9 Edits proposed to MM-BIO-7, On-site Mitigation, have been incorporated into the Final MND and MMRP.
5 Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Nichols, L. Master, K. Snow, A. Tomaino, R. Bittman, G. Hammerson, B. Heidel, L. Ramsay, A. Teucher, and B. Young. 2012. NatureServe Conservation Status Assessments: Methodology for Assigning Ranks. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. 6 CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2018. California Natural Communities. January 2022. Accessed February 2022. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP/Natural-Communities#sensitive%20natural%20communities.

Item #8. Page 1542
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1607
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 9
S1-10 Edits proposed to MM-BIO-2, Nesting Bird Avoidance, have been incorporated into the Final MND and MMRP.

S1-11 Edits proposed to MM-BIO-3, Bat Roost Avoidance, have been incorporated into the Final MND and MMRP.

S1-12 The City acknowledges CDFW’s recommendation on restricting the use of any species, particularly those listed ‘Moderate’ or ‘High’ by the California Invasive Plant Council.

S1-13 The City acknowledges the comment regards to fence materials.

S1-14 The City acknowledges the comment regarding having to submit California Natural Diversity Database forms and Combined Rapid Assessment and Relevé Forms if applicable.

S1-15 The comment requests that the biological mitigation measures be included in a Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Plan (MMRP). The Final MND includes an MMRP with the biological mitigation measures.

S1-16 Payment of filing fees will be completed as part of filing of the Notice of Determination. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

S1-17 The comment and provides concluding remarks. No further response is required.

Item #8. Page 1543
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1608
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 10

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 1544
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1609
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 11
Local Agencies
Response to Comment Letter L1
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
July 25, 2022
L1-1 The comment is an introduction to the comments that follow.

L1-2 Changes to Section 3.19, Utilities and Service Systems, of the Final MND have been made to reflect that the Mesquite Regional Landfill no longer accepts waste, and now accurately identifies the landfills that are accepting waste and are able to accommodate the proposed Project.

L1-3 Changes to Section 3.19, Utilities and Service Systems, of the MND have been made to accurately reflect that the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant located adjacent to the City of Industry would treat the wastewater from the proposed Project.

L1-4 The comment and provides concluding remarks. No further response is required.

Item #8. Page 1545
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1610
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 12

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 1546
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1611
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 13
Response to Comment Letter L2
County of Los Angeles Fire Department
January 20, 2021
L2-1 The comment is an introduction to the comments that follow.

L2-2 Revisions have been made to the Final MND, Section 3.15 Public Services to reflect the number of staff associated with Station 151.

L2-3 Comment noted. The project is committed to compliance with all applicable code and ordinance requirements for construction, access, water mains, fire flows, and fire hydrants. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

L2-4 Access requirements listed in the comment have been reviewed and added or revised on Tentative Map
L2-5 Water system requirements listed in the comment have been reviewed and added or revised on Tentative Map.

L2-6 Comment noted. Comment states statutory responsibilities of the County of Los Angeles Fire Department, Forestry Division. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

L2-7 Comment noted. Comment states that the Health Hazardous Materials Division of the Los Angeles County Fire Department does not have any comments or requirements for the project at this time.

The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

Item #8. Page 1547
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1612
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 14

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 1548
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1613
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 15
Response to Comment Letter L3
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
August 22, 2022
L3-1 The City appreciates MWD’s review of the MND for the proposed project.

L3-2 The comment state that the MND accurately discusses Metropolitan’s Upper Feeder, Monrovia Tunnel, and associated appurtenances. The comment state that the MND accurately identifies MWD as a Responsible/Trustee Agency for potential approvals. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

L3-3 The City understands that coordination will be required with MWD’s Substructures Team regarding below-ground facilities, rights-of-way, and specific submittal of appropriate drawings as needed. The comment provides contact information for MWD’s Substructures Team. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

L3-4 The comment identifies the attachment provided (Attachment L3-A), metropolitan’s Guidelines for Improvements and Construction Projects Proposed in the Area of Metropolitan’s Facilities and Rights-of-Way. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

L3-5 The comment and provides concluding remarks. No further response is required.

Item #8. Page 1549
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1614
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 16

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 1550
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1615
Responses to Comments
Grand Estates Project MND 8375
December 2022 17
Individuals
Response to Comment Letter I1
Sylvia Barton
July 28, 2022
I1-1 The City acknowledges the comment as an introduction to comments that follow.

I1-2 The comment provides historical information regarding the purchase of property by Philip Shorey due to the water availability from springs on the property. The comment also states that Philip Shorey sold water rights and pipeline arrangements to neighboring properties. The comment also identifies a number of attachments included with the comment letter (Attachments I1-A through I1-D). The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND. The historical information received, will be provided to any consultants doing future biological studies regarding the property.

I1-3 The comment states that there are springs of water located along the Glendora Foothills that run freely after winter rain storms. The comment expresses concerns for residents of the proposed project if ample winter rain returns. The comment does not raise an issue related to the adequacy of any specific section or analysis of the MND.

I1-4 The comment and provides concluding remarks. No further response is required.

Item #8. Page 1551
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1616
Item #8. Page 1552
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1617
Item #8. Page 1553
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1618
Item #8. Page 1554
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1619
Item #8. Page 1555
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1620

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Boyer called the regular meeting of the City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority of the City of Glendora to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Michael Allawos, Karen Davis, David Fredendall, Mayor Pro Tem Mendell Thompson, and Mayor Gary Boyer
Councilmembers Absent: None.

Staff members present: City Manager/Executive Director Adam Raymond, City/Agency Attorney William Wynder, Assistant City Manager Moises Lopez, Police Chief Matt Egan, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Marie Ricci, Community Development Director Jeff Kugel, Library Director Janet Stone, Information Technology Director Sam Robbin, City Clerk/Communications Director Kathleen Sessman, Housing and Economic Manager Valerie Velasquez, Management Analyst Julie Linger, Management Analyst Alycia Suniga, Associate Planner Natalie Espinoza, Transportation Manager Steven Mateer, Senior Management Analyst Russell Ackerman, Management Analyst Armando DeJesus, City Planner Mark Carnahan, Assistant Public Works Director Michael Sledd, Assistant Public Works Director Chisom Obegolu, Digital Media Specialist Craig Gill, Senior Digital Media Specialist Greg Morton, City Clerk Specialist Lorena Cordova

CLOSED SESSION
City/Agency Attorney Wynder read the agendized Closed Session titles into the record and announced that Item 2, Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation A closed session pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with legal counsel regarding pending litigation to which the City is a party. The title of such litigation is as follows: Rosalio Caballero vs. City of Glendora; Claim No. 19-14010 will not be discussed.:

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code §54956.8, enable the City Council and Housing Authority to consider negotiations with Paul Rodriguez, with whom City is negotiating, and to give direction to its negotiator(s) Adam Raymond, Moises Lopez, Jeff Kugel, and Valerie Velasquez regarding that certain real property 1762 Dale Road, APN 8631-013-023. The City’s real property negotiator will seek direction from the City Council regarding the price and terms of payment for the property.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with legal counsel regarding pending litigation to which the City is a party. The title of such litigation is as follows: Rosalio Caballero vs. City of Glendora; Claim No. 19-14010
City of Glendora Minutes
City Council, Successor Agency and
Housing Authority
Tuesday, January 10, 2023
Council Chamber, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard
Virtually via Zoom ID 9329247224
Item #9. Page 1
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1621
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 2 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority Mayor Boyer invited public comment and inquired if any requests had been received. There were no written correspondence and/or request from participants wishing to provide public comment; therefore, Mayor Boyer convened the meeting into closed session at 6:02 p.m.

Mayor Boyer adjourned closed session at 6:30 p.m. and reconvened the meeting back into open session at 7:00 p.m. with all members present and requested that City Attorney Wynder report out of closed session.

City Attorney Wynder stated that Closed Session was held and reported the following actions: Item #1) Parties have been in negotiations regarding the purchase and sale of the property, the parties now have agreed upon the sale and purchase, a purchase and sales agreement will now need to be drafted consistent with those terms and conditions and will be brought forward at a future public City Council meeting for consideration and possible action. Item #2) Discussion was not conducted and was postponed to a date uncertain.

REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no requests for reordering of and additions to the agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENT

3. Public Comments received
Mayor/Chair Boyer opened the public comment period. Written correspondence and/or requests to provided comments were received from the following: Joe Cina and Michael Roth.

There were no additional requests received; and therefore, Mayor/Chair Boyer closed the public comment period.

MEMBER STATEMENTS/REPORTS
Councilmember Fredendall wished everyone a Happy New Year and is looking forward to serving the community in the upcoming year.

Mayor Pro Tem Thompson commented beginning of 2023 and the rainfall; provided an update on the Gold Line construction; and wished everyone a wonderful year.

Councilmember Allawos wished everyone a Happy New Year; commented on Council of Government (COG) meetings recently attended; issues with the homeless; and that a new medical facility will be coming to Glendora in February.

Mayor Boyer announced the City’s receipt of a $5 million grant received from the Federal Government to complete Phase 2 and 3 of the Glendora Urban Trail and provided an update on the 1st Regional Grant.

CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY STATEMENTS
City Manager Raymond reported on the current water consumption and its savings of 27%; current Item #9. Page 2
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1622
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 3 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority rain fall of 3.5 inches of rain in the past twenty four hours and about 5.7 inches over the last seven days; announced that additional rain is expected throughout the week, currently there are no major issues to the community from the last rain storm with the exception of some city facilities which are experiencing leaks.

INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Invocation was given by Member Doug Ferrell of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Jackson Thiel.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

4. A Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance Amending the Glendora Municipal Code Title 21 (Zoning) Regarding Outdoor Dining Standards in the Glendora Village (PLN22-0041) Mayor Boyer read title into the record and opened the public hearing.

Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Management Analyst Suniga.

Mayor Boyer invited public testimony and inquired if any requests have been received to provide testimony. Written correspondence and/or requests to provide comments were received from the following: John Harrold, Matt Russell, and Don Nolan.

City Council discussion included the compliance and enforcement; power box access and fee; accountability; City's support of merchants during the pandemic; concern with overregulation; pros and cons of restricting umbrellas color to solid verses multi-colored; confirmation that the proposed standards don’t allow advertisement, logos, etc. on umbrellas; cleaning and maintenance of the parklet's; pros and cons of the proposed fee structure and amount; comprehensive verse itemized fee structure; pros and cons of having electrical usage a separate fee; parklet application process; need for guidelines and the desire to have the Business Improvement District (BID) Advisory Board involved in its develop; support of the 6 foot sidewalk distance but desire to lock down exactly where that 6 foot starts and ends so it is consistent throughout the village; appropriate placement of outdoor décor and signage for no parklet businesses; and confirmation of height of the umbrella clearance.

There were no additional questions or comments; therefore, Mayor Boyer closed the public hearing.

A motion was made by Council Member Allawos, failed due to lack of a second, to direct staff to incorporate the following changes into the proposed standards and approve staff’s recommendations:
1) Remove the solid color requirement associated relating to umbrellas and allow umbrellas to be multi-colored but no advertising, 2) Handle the fee structure at a later date, 3) have electricity usage as a separate and annual fee.

A motion was made by Mendell Thompson, seconded by Karen K. Davis, to directed staff to move forward with utilizing a comprehensive fee, fee to be no more than $755, supported embedding into the fee the use of power, require umbrellas to be a solid color as proposed, and including a payment plan option and then approve staff’s recommendation with the above-mentioned changes: 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to §15305 and 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines; 2. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance 2075 entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF Item #9. Page 3
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1623
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 4 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING TITLE 21 (ZONING), SECTION 21.06.070 (CCAP ZONING

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) OF THE GLENDORA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO OUTDOOR DINING,” by reading of the title only and waiving further reading; 3. Schedule second reading and adoption of the ordinance for the January 24, 2023 City Council meeting; 4. Direct the preparation of a summary of ordinance for publication pursuant to Govt Code 36933 and Resolution CC 2018-40.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 3 - 2 as follows: AYES: Karen K. Davis, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: Michael Allawos and David J. Fredendall; (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

5. A Public Hearing to consider a resolution to approve a request of a Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan Review for 33 townhomes on certain property located at 531-555 East Arrow Highway, Glendora, California (Project No. PLN20-0011; Applicant: JWDA-MS Architects; Property owner: Deli Group Inc.)
Mayor Boyer read title into the record and opened the Public Hearing.

Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Associate Planner Espinoza.

Report was given by Applicant Moises Barroso Martinez from JWDA-MS Architects and Applicant William Tan.

Mayor Boyer invited public testimony and inquired if any requests have been received. There were no written correspondence and/or requests from participants wishing to provide public testimony; therefore, Mayor Boyer closed the public hearing.

City Council discussion townhome designs that incorporated bedroom on the first floor.

A motion was made by Michael Allawos, seconded by Mendell Thompson, to 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the project; and 2.

Adopt a City Council Resolution CC 2023-01 entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 82883 AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND TO CREATE 33 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM TOWNHOMES ON CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 531-555 E. ARROW HIGHWAY, GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA (PROJECT NO.

PLN20-0011; APPLICANT: JWDA-MS ARCHITECTS; PROPERTY OWNER: DELI GROUP, INC.).”
An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Karen K. Davis, seconded by Mendell Thompson, to approve Consent Calendar Items #6-#11 as presented affirming the actions appropriate to each item.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); Item #9. Page 4
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1624
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 5 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

6. Affirm minutes from December 13, 2022 Special and Regular meetings The City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority affirmed the minutes as presented.

7. City of Glendora and Glendora Successor Agency Investment Report for November 2022 The City Council and Successor Agency received and filed the monthly Investment Activity Report for November 2022.

8. Review and affirm disbursements for December 2022 in the amount of $4,163,867.57 The City Council, Successor Agency affirmed disbursements for December 2022 in the amount of $4,163,867.57.

9. Notice of Completion for Citywide Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Improvements Projects, Plan No. 1349 (Strategic Plan Item 46-IMCIF)
The City Council 1. accepted the completion of Citywide and Curb Ramp Improvements Project, Plan No. 1349 by CT&T Concrete Contractors, Inc; and, 2. Authorized the Mayor to sign the Notice of Competition for recordation.

10. Award the Contract for the Construction of Grand Avenue and Bennett Avenue Traffic Signal Modification, Left Turn Phasing, Plan No. 1351 to California Professional Engineering, Inc. (Strategic Plan Item 46-IMCIF)
The City Council 1. adopted a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the California Code of Regulations; 2. Approve the Plans and Specifications, including Addenda No. 1, for Grand Avenue and Bennett Avenue Traffic Signal Modification, Left Turn Phasing, Plan No. 1351; 3. Award the contract for Grand Avenue and Bennett Avenue Traffic Signal Modification, Left Turn Phasing, Plan No. 1351 to California Professional Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $278,439, with a 10% contingency of $27,843.90, for a total contract amount not to exceed $306,282.90; and, 4. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement including making minor non-substantive changes.

11. Award an Agreement to Grigolla & Sons Construction Co. Inc. for As-Needed Concrete Maintenance and Repair Services in the Amount of $104,000 per Year for Three Years (Strategic Plan Item 49-IMCIF)
The City Council 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the California Code of Regulations; 2. Award a 3-year agreement to Grigolla & Sons Construction Company Inc. for as-needed concrete maintenance and repair services in the amount of $104,000 per year, for a total of $312,000; 3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement including minimal and/or non-substantive changes; and, 4.

Authorize the Public Works Director to execute any necessary changes orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount.

MEMBER AGENDA ITEMS
Item #9. Page 5
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1625
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 6 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority

12. Conduct 2023 Annual Review of City Council Appointments to Various Regional Organizations as City Representatives/Delegates
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a City Council Resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING

DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES TO VARIOUS REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMITTEES THAT THE CITY OF GLENDORA IS A MEMBER FOR 2022-23 AND RESCIND RESOLUTION CC 2022-64;" 2. Review the services provided by Cal Cities as it compares to membership in other organizations, and provide Staff with direction on the City’s future membership with Cal Cities; and, 3. If directed to remain in Cal Cities, authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the Cal Cities President, CEO, and Regional Public Affairs Manager, requesting the General Assembly be held earlier during the annual conference, additional voting methods be considered, and expressing the need for Cal Cities to reaffirm its commitment to local control.

Staff report was presented by City Manager Raymond. In closing, he announced that California Cities Deputy Director – LA Division Melanie Perron is attending via zoom and is available to answer questions.

City Council discussion included the city’s membership in Leagues of California Cities (Cal Cities) Cal Cities mission and philosophy; advocacy efforts; frustration with push for local control issues and Cal Cities transparency; concerns regarding the efficacies of Cal Cities’ lobbying; frustration with the scheduling and voting methodology utilized at the Cal Cities 2023 general assembly; Cal Cities support of Sacramento instead of cities and local control; pros and cons of sending a letter to the Cal Cities; next steps and what can the city expect from Cal Cities moving forward; and a request to bring the City’s membership in Cal Cities back for further discussion in six months to see where we stand and what has been done to date.

California Cities Deputy Director Melanie Perron responded to Council comments and outlined educational opportunities offered by Cal Cities.

A motion was made by David J. Fredendall, seconded by Michael Allawos, to 1. Adopt a City Council Resolution CC 2023-02 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES TO VARIOUS

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMITTEES THAT THE CITY OF GLENDORA IS A MEMBER FOR 2022-23 AND RESCIND RESOLUTION CC 2022-64;" 2) Directed staff to continue the City’s membership in Cal Cities at this time, and authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the Cal Cities President, CEO, and Regional Public Affairs Manager, requesting the General Assembly be held earlier during the annual conference, additional voting methods be considered, and expressing the need for Cal Cities to reaffirm its commitment to local control; and 3) Direct staff to schedule a follow-up meeting on this matter in 6-month for further discussion to see where we stand and what has been done to date by Cal Cities.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Item #9. Page 6
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1626
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 7 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority

13. Resolution Declaring the Closure of Meda Avenue Within the Glendora Village for the Purposes of Improving Safety and Economic Development (Strategic Plan Item 4-ISED, 51- IMCIF)
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a City Council Resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING THE CLOSURE OF MEDA AVENUE WITHIN THE

GLENDORA VILLAGE FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPROVING SAFETY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT."
Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Transportation Manager Mateer.

City Council discussion included the security options and future possibility of installing cameras at the location; proposed use of lockers to check out games; and signage outlining the rules when utilizing the area.

A motion was made by David J. Fredendall, seconded by Michael Allawos, to 1. Adopt a City Council Resolution CC 2023-03 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING THE

CLOSURE OF MEDA AVENUE WITHIN THE GLENDORA VILLAGE FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPROVING SAFETY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT."
An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

NEW BUSINESS

14. Award a Contract to Jan's Towing Inc. for Police Towing Services for Three Years with Options to Renew for Two Additional One Year Terms
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award a three-year contract to Jan’s Towing Inc. for police towing services, with an option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement and any subsequent renewals including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.

Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Management Analyst Linger.

City Council discussion included the Jan’s Towing partnership with the City; and the cost structure utilized.

A motion made by Michael Allawos, seconded by Karen K. Davis, to 1. Award a three-year contract to Jan’s Towing Inc. for police towing services, with an option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement and any subsequent renewals including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

15. Award a contract to Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. for parking enforcement services for a three-year term in the amount of $817,316
Item #9. Page 7
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1627
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 8 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award a contract for parking enforcement services to Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. in the amount of up to $817,315.20 for three years with an option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement and any subsequent renewals including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.

Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Management Analyst Linger.

City Council discussion included pros and cons of contracting out parking enforcement services; InterCon Security Systems, Inc service; parking enforcing in alleyway; pricing structure; clarification that revenue made from parking enforcement go to the general fund; and parking enforcement at schools and sporting events.

A motion was made by Council Member Allawos to approve staff’s recommendations and direct staff to add the verbiage "alleyways" to the scope. Motion was seconded by Council Member Davis and then rescinded. Motion failed due to a lack of a second.

A motion was made by Mendell Thompson, seconded by Karen K. Davis, to 1. Award a contract for parking enforcement services to Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. in the amount of up to $817,315.20 for three years with an option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement and any subsequent renewals including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

16. Approve the Inter-Utility Service and Co-Funding Agreement with Southern California Gas Company for performing water efficiency installation services as part of water conservation program, in an amount not to exceed $250,000 (Strategic Plan Item 8-IFSS) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the inter-utility service and co-funding Agreement with Southern California Gas Company for direct installation of water efficiency devices as part of a cooperative gas and water efficiency program in an amount not to exceed $250,000; and 2.

Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.

Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Senior Management Analyst Ackerman.

A motion was made by David Fredendall, seconded by Mendell Thompson, to 1. Approve the interutility service and co-funding Agreement with Southern California Gas Company for direct installation of water efficiency devices as part of a cooperative gas and water efficiency program in an amount not to exceed $250,000; and 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

Item #9. Page 8
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1628
Minutes Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Page 9 of 9
City Council Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority

17. Approve a Contract Agreement with Myers Houghton & Partners, Inc. for the Library Structural Analysis and Options for Vertical Expansion Project (Strategic Plan Item 46-IMCIF) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve an Agreement with Myers Houghton & Partners, Inc. for the Library Structural Analysis and Options for Vertical Expansion project in the amount of $215,941 and a 10% contingency in the amount of $21,595, for a total contract not to exceed $237,536; 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement with Myers Houghton & Partners, Inc., including minimal and/or non-substantive changes; and 3. Approve a supplemental appropriation from the Capital Projects Fund 321 to the project in the amount of $88,651.

Staff report and PowerPoint was presented by Assistant Public Works Director Sledd.

A motion was made by Michael Allawos, seconded by Mendell Thompson, to 1. Approve an Agreement with Myers Houghton & Partners, Inc. for the Library Structural Analysis and Options for Vertical Expansion project in the amount of $215,941 and a 10% contingency in the amount of $21,595, for a total contract not to exceed $237,536; 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement with Myers Houghton & Partners, Inc., including minimal and/or nonsubstantive changes; and 3. Approve a supplemental appropriation from the Capital Projects Fund 321 to the project in the amount of $88,651.

An oral roll call vote was conducted, and the motion carried 5 - 0 as follows: AYES: Michael Allawos, Karen K. Davis, David J. Fredendall, Mendell Thompson, Gary Boyer; NOES: (None); ABSENT: (None); ABSTAIN: (None).

MEMBER/STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS
Councilmember Fredendall requested an update on the current roadway (aka alleyway) parking ordinance at a future meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor/Chair Boyer adjourned the meeting at 9:55 p.m.

Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communication Director
Minutes were approved on __________________ by the City Council of the City of Glendora, with the City of Glendora acting as the Successor Agency to the Glendora Community Redevelopment Agency per ABx1 26, codified at Health & Safety Code §34173(a).

Item #9. Page 9
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1629

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS DATE: JANUARY 24, 2023
FROM: FINANCE DISTRICT(S): CITYWIDE
SUBJECT: CITY OF GLENDORA AND GLENDORA SUCCESSOR AGENCY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2022.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City/Agency Council:

1. Receive and file the Monthly Investment Activity Report for December 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City’s book value of cash and investments for December 2022 totaled $130,311,263. This is an increase of $4,276,180 (3%) compared to the previous month. The City received its semi-annual property revenue in month of December in the amount of $3,531,522.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Pursuant to Section 19 of the City’s FY 2022-23 Investment Policy, a monthly investment report must be provided to the City Council to provide a clear picture of the status of the current portfolio.

DISCUSSION
As prescribed in the Investment Policy for FY 2023, the attached investment report provides a listing of individual securities held at the end of the reporting period by authorized investment category, the average life and final maturity of all investments listed, coupon rate, discount or earnings rate, Par Value, Market Value and Book Value of each investment in the portfolio, including funds managed for the City by third parties.

There were no investment purchases for the month of December; there were three securities matured at $245,000 each, resulting in neither a gain nor a loss.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not applicable
Prepared By Linda Lopez, Senior Accounting Technician
Concurs With Not Applicable
Reviewed By Kyle Johnson, Assistant Director - Finance
Certified to Availability of Funds Marie Ricci, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Approved By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CEQA Review Not Applicable
Item #10. Page 1
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1630
Staff Report Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENTS:

A. December 2022 Investment Report
Item #10. Page 2
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1631

CITY OF GLENDORA

INVESTMENT REPORT SUMMARY
December 31, 2022
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 53600 et seq. and Section 16 of the City of Glendora’s Investment Policy, a monthly investment report must be provided to the City Council providing a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio. Included in the report are several specific items relating to portfolio holdings including, but not limited to, investment type, par value, market value, book value, coupon rate and yield to maturity. The report is in conformity with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code 53601. Per the policy, the report reflects pooled cash from all city funds. It does not reflect any restrictions associated with how each individual fund can be utilized. This information is provided through other financial reports that include the budget, Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and other financial reports available through the website. The objective of the City investments is to provide safety of principal and liquidity,while then providing a return on investments. (Section 4 of the policy). All brokered transactions are held by a third-party custodian designated by the Treasurer. (Section 14 of the policy). There is currently one custodial account, which is UBS Financial Services. Presented is a comparison of the average monthly yield and interest received from prior years for the same month, along with a visual graph. I hereby certify the investments are in compliance with the investment policy adopted by the City Council. The investment portfolio provides sufficient funds to meet the budgeted expenditures over the next six months. Approved By: __________________________________________________ Kyle Johnson, Asst. Director – Finance December FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023
Interest $87,220 $75,679 $94,226
Average Monthly Yield 1.48% 1.14% 1.50%

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
$0
$50,000
$100,000$150,000$200,000$250,000
FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023
Interest Average Monthly Yield
Item #10. Page 3
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1632

CHEN/GIORDANO/CRAWFORD
213-972-1457
Financial Advisor:

Pasadena, CA 911013020Branch office:251 South Lake Avenue10th Floor UBS Client Reviewas of December 29, 2022
Prepared forCity of GlendoraAccounts included in this review* excluded from performance exhibitsAccount Name TypeSX XX180 • City of Glendora • Business Service Account@SX XXX283* • CITY OF GL • Non UBS Investment Bank of America@SX XXX279* • CITY OF GL • Non UBS Investment LAIF What's insideAsset allocation review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Sources of portfolio value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Bond summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Portfolio holdings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Bond holdings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Important information about this report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Item #10. Page 4
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1633
Asset allocation review
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
as of December 29, 2022
Summary of asset allocation
Market
value ($)
% of
Portfolio
Cash 27,174,820.10 22.11
Cash 27,174,820.10 22.11
US 27,174,820.10 22.11
Fixed Income 95,757,773.34 77.89
US 95,757,773.34 77.89
US Fixed Income 18,292,904.29 14.88Government 49,564,420.52 40.31Municipals 254,072.39 0.21Corporate IG Credit 27,646,376.14 22.49 Equity 0.00 0.00Commodities 0.00 0.00Non-Traditional 0.00 0.00Other 0.00 0.00 Total Portfolio $122,932,593.45 100%Balanced mutual funds are allocated in the 'Other' categoryAssets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 2 of 31 Item #10. Page 5
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1634
Sources of portfolio value
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
as of December 29, 2022$ Millions
MTD
11/30/2022 to
12/29/2022
QTD
09/30/2022 to
12/29/2022
ITD
02/23/2022 to
12/29/2022
YTD
02/23/2022 to
12/29/2022
Opening value 96,077,114.85 95,153,841.04 40,588,997.50 40,589,214.16Net deposits/withdrawals -49,345.03 247,275.23 60,382,979.35 60,382,979.35Div./interest income 94,225.99 282,785.33 1,016,292.14 1,016,292.14Change in accr. interest 26,988.13 75,032.82 268,692.31 268,692.31Change in value 149,310.21 539,359.74 -5,958,667.15 -5,958,883.81Closing value 96,298,294.16 96,298,294.16 96,298,294.16 96,298,294.16Net Time-weighted ROR 0.28 0.94 -4.88 -4.88Performance returns are annualized after 1 year. Net deposits and withdrawals include program and account fees.Benchmarks - Annualized time-weighted returnsUS Treasury Bill - 3 Mos 0.35 0.88 1.51 1.51 BofA Corp/Gov 1-5Y 0.14 1.24 -3.69 -3.69BBG Agg Bond -0.22 2.11 -9.00 -9.00Past performance does not guarantee future results and current performance may be lower/higher than past data presented.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 3 of 31 Item #10. Page 6
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1635
Bond summary
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
as of December 29, 2022Bond overviewTotal quantity 103,584,000Total market value $95,421,813.53Total accrued interest $335,959.81Total market value plus accrued interest $95,757,773.34Total estimated annual bond interest $1,434,175.75Average yield to maturityAverage coupon 1.41%

4.65%1.50%4.65%
Average current yieldAverage yield to worstAverage modified duration 2.39Average effective maturity 2.58 Investment type allocationInvestment type Taxable ($) Total ($) Tax-exempt /
deferred ($)
% of
bond
port.

Certificates of deposit 18,292,904.29 0.00 18,292,904.29 19.10Municipals 254,072.39 0.00 254,072.39 0.27U.S. corporates 27,646,376.14 0.00 27,646,376.14 28.87U.S. federal agencies 46,254,297.46 0.00 46,254,297.46 48.30U.S. treasuries 3,310,123.07 0.00 3,310,123.07 3.46Total $95,757,773.35 $0.00 $95,757,773.35 100% Credit quality of bond holdings
Effective credit rating
% of
port.

Value on
Issues 12/29/2022 ($)
A Aaa/AAA/AAA 31 50,534,915.53 52.80B Aa/AA/AA 3 3,075,189.06 3.21C A/A/A 16 23,854,764.47 24.87D Baa/BBB/BBB 0 0.00 0.00E Non-investment grade 0 0.00 0.00F Certificate of deposit 80 18,292,904.29 19.12G Not rated 0 0.00 0.00Total 130 $95,757,773.34 100% Bond maturity schedule
$ Millions
Cash, mutual funds and some preferred securities are not included.

Includes all fixed income securities in the selected porfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 4 of 31 Item #10. Page 7
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1636
Portfolio holdings
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
as of December 29, 2022Summary of Portfolio Holdings
Unrealized
Cost basis ($) gain/loss (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Value on
12/29/2022 ($)
Current
yield (%)
% of
Portfolio
A Cash 27,169,193.98 27,174,820.10 0.00 0.00% 235.69 0.00% 22.11% Cash 27,169,193.98 27,174,820.10 0.00 0.00% 235.69 0.00% 22.11% US 27,169,193.98 27,174,820.10 0.00 0.00% 235.69 0.00% 22.11% B Fixed Income 103,142,068.70 95,757,773.34 -8,129,149.81 -7.88% 1,434,175.75 1.50% 77.89% US 103,142,068.70 95,757,773.34 -8,129,149.81 -7.88% 1,434,175.75 1.50% 77.89% US Fixed Income 19,408,374.34 18,292,904.29 -1,115,470.05 -5.75% 347,518.50 1.90% 14.88% Government 53,486,090.03 49,564,420.52 -4,412,451.57 -8.25% 559,976.50 1.13% 40.31% Municipals 0.00 254,072.39 0.00 0.00% 12,872.50 5.11% 0.21% Corporate IG Credit 30,247,604.33 27,646,376.14 -2,601,228.19 -8.60% 513,808.25 1.86% 22.49% C Equity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
D Commodities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00%E Non-Traditional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00%F Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00%Total Portfolio $130,311,262.68 $122,932,593.45 $-8,129,149.81 -6.24% $1,434,411.44 1.17% 100% Balanced mutual funds are allocated in the 'Other' category Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 5 of 31
Item #10. Page 8
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1637
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Details of portfolio holdings
% of
asset
class
Est. annual
Cost basis ($) income ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
(%)
Unrealized
Market value ($) gain/loss ($)
Current
yield (%)
Total Portfolio $130,311,262.68 $122,932,593.45 $-8,129,149.81 -6.24% $1,434,411.44 1.17% 100% 100% % of
Portfolio
Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Cash Avg Price Market value ($)
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Cash
% of
Portfolio
CashUSOutside ASSET (1) 1.00 23,283,882.98 23,283,882.98 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 85.68% 18.94%[Outside Account @SXXXX279]

1.00 Outside ASSET (1) 1.00 3,350,416.31 3,350,416.31 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 12.33% 2.73%[Outside Account @SXXXX283]

1.00 UBS INSURED SWEEP PROGRAM 278,328.69 1.00 1.00 278,328.69 278,328.69 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 1.02% 0.23%UBS SELECT PRIME 5,625.00 0.00 0.00 5,626.12 0.00 0.00% 235.69 4.19% 0.00%INSTITUTIONAL FUND

1.00 0.02%
USD CASH 256,566.00 2.00 1.00 256,566.00 256,566.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.94% 0.21%Total US $27,169,193.98 $27,174,820.10 $0.00 0.00% $235.69 100.00 0.00% 22.11%Total Cash $27,169,193.98 $27,174,820.10 $0.00 0.00% $235.69 100.00 0.00% 22.11%Total Cash $27,169,193.98 $27,174,820.10 $0.00 0.00% $235.69 100.00 0.00% 22.11% Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
USUS Fixed Income
ALLY BK UT US RT 03.5500% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 241,398.84 0.00 -3,601.16 -1.47% 8,697.50 3.67% 0.20%MAT 06/30/26 FIXED RATE CD

96.76 0.25%
AMERICAN COMM BK GA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,801.34 0.00 -26,198.66 -10.69% 980.00 0.45% 0.18%00.4000% MAT 09/22/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.30 0.23%
ANN ARBOR ST BK MI US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 244,002.38 0.00 -997.62 -0.41% 6,737.50 2.76% 0.20%02.7500% MAT 04/20/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.53 0.25%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 6 of 31 Item #10. Page 9
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1638
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
BANK OF NEW ENGLAN NH US 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 240,431.52 0.00 -4,568.48 -1.86% 6,982.50 2.91% 0.20%RT 02.8500% MAT 02/15/24FIXED RATE CD

98.03 0.25%
BANK3 TENNESSEE TN US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 219,370.78 0.00 -25,629.22 -10.46% 980.00 0.45% 0.18%00.4000% MAT 08/28/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.54 0.23%
BANKUNITED NA FLOR FL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,470.12 0.00 -26,529.88 -10.83% 2,327.50 1.07% 0.18%00.9500% MAT 03/31/26 FIXEDRATE CD

89.10 0.23%
BAY ST SVGS BK MA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 238,972.33 0.00 -6,027.67 -2.46% 4,165.00 1.75% 0.19%01.7000% MAT 11/29/23 FIXEDRATE CD

97.40 0.25%
BEAL BANK - PLANO TX US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 238,517.10 0.00 -6,482.90 -2.65% 5,390.00 2.27% 0.19%02.2000% MAT 04/17/24 FIXEDRATE CD

96.93 0.25%
BELL ST B&T ND US RT 01.6000% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 229,941.73 0.00 -15,058.27 -6.15% 3,920.00 1.70% 0.19%MAT 02/27/25 FIXED RATE CD

93.85 0.24%
BK HAPOALIM BM NY US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 217,718.14 0.00 -27,281.86 -11.14% 1,225.00 0.56% 0.18%00.5000% MAT 12/15/25 FIXEDRATE CD

88.84 0.23%
BMO HARRIS BK NA IL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 217,609.27 0.00 -27,390.73 -11.18% 1,960.00 0.90% 0.18%00.8000% MAT 03/18/26 FIXEDRATE CD

88.80 0.23%
BMW BANK NORTH AME UT US 245,000.00 100.09 245,230.36 232,348.33 -83.52 -12,882.03 -5.25% 4,410.00 1.91% 0.19%RT 01.8000% MAT 03/04/25FIXED RATE CD

94.26 0.24%
CAPITAL ONE BK USA VA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 215,647.22 0.00 -29,352.78 -11.98% 2,817.50 1.31% 0.18%01.1500% MAT 11/24/26 FIXEDRATE CD

87.91 0.23%
CAPITAL ONE NA VA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 215,647.22 0.00 -29,352.78 -11.98% 2,817.50 1.31% 0.18%01.1500% MAT 11/24/26 FIXEDRATE CD

87.91 0.23%
CELTIC BK UT US RT 03.0000% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 243,942.61 0.00 -1,057.39 -0.43% 7,350.00 3.02% 0.20%MAT 05/18/23 FIXED RATE CD

99.48 0.25%
CENTERSTATE BK NA FL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 226,116.34 0.00 -18,883.66 -7.71% 2,450.00 1.09% 0.18%01.0000% MAT 04/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD

92.13 0.24%
CFG COMMUNITY BANK MD US 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 243,097.66 0.00 -1,902.34 -0.78% 9,310.00 3.89% 0.20%RT 03.8000% MAT 03/11/26FIXED RATE CD

97.77 0.25%
CHAMBERS BANK AK US RT 108,000.00 100.00 108,000.00 96,656.76 0.00 -11,343.27 -10.50% 378.00 0.39% 0.08%00.3500% MAT 09/22/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.40 0.10%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 7 of 31 Item #10. Page 10
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1639
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
CITADEL FED CREDIT PA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 230,192.30 0.00 -14,807.70 -6.04% 4,042.50 1.76% 0.19%01.6500% MAT 02/27/25 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT

93.95 0.24%
CITIBANK NA SD US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 245,883.34 0.00 883.34 0.36% 6,982.50 2.86% 0.20%02.8500% MAT 03/29/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.65 0.26%
CITIZENS ST BK CLA WI US RT 219,000.00 100.00 219,000.00 208,087.38 0.00 -10,912.62 -4.98% 3,723.00 1.79% 0.17%01.7000% MAT 10/31/24 FIXEDRATE CD

94.88 0.22%
COMMERCIAL BK TN US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 243,821.48 0.00 -1,178.52 -0.48% 7,595.00 3.12% 0.20%03.1000% MAT 05/25/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.49 0.25%
COMMUNITY BK TN US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 219,425.15 0.00 -25,574.85 -10.44% 980.00 0.45% 0.18%00.4000% MAT 08/26/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.56 0.23%
COMMUNITYWIDE FED IN US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 238,891.31 0.00 -6,108.69 -2.49% 5,512.50 2.33% 0.19%02.2500% MAT 06/28/24 FIXEDRATE CD

96.58 0.25%
CONNEXUS CREDIT UN WI US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 230,537.25 0.00 -14,462.75 -5.90% 735.00 0.32% 0.19%00.3000% MAT 05/28/24 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT

94.07 0.24%
DISCOVER BANK DE US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 232,526.68 0.00 -12,473.32 -5.09% 7,840.00 3.38% 0.19%03.2000% MAT 05/24/27 FIXEDRATE CD

94.60 0.24%
EAGLEMARK SVGS BK NV US RT 245,000.00 100.38 245,927.67 222,931.81 -175.41 -22,995.86 -9.35% 4,900.00 2.21% 0.18%02.0000% MAT 03/02/27 FIXEDRATE CD

90.35 0.23%
ENCORE BANK AR US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 224,196.28 0.00 -20,803.72 -8.49% 1,960.00 0.87% 0.18%00.8000% MAT 05/15/25 FIXEDRATE CD

91.48 0.23%
ENERBANK UT US RT 00.6500% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 223,116.13 0.00 -21,883.87 -8.93% 1,592.50 0.71% 0.18%MAT 06/19/25 FIXED RATE CD

91.05 0.23%
FIRST CAROLINA BK NC US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 222,910.63 0.00 -22,089.37 -9.02% 1,470.00 0.66% 0.18%00.6000% MAT 06/26/25 FIXEDRATE CD

90.98 0.23%
FIRST N/B MCGREG TX US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 240,269.72 0.00 -4,730.28 -1.93% 6,982.50 2.91% 0.20%02.8500% MAT 02/21/24 FIXEDRATE CD

98.00 0.25%
FIRST NATL BK KS US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 234,469.87 0.00 -10,530.13 -4.30% 4,532.50 1.94% 0.19%01.8500% MAT 08/30/24 FIXEDRATE CD

95.56 0.24%
FIRST ST BK AR US RT 01.8000% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 234,264.13 0.00 -10,735.87 -4.38% 4,410.00 1.89% 0.19%MAT 08/30/24 FIXED RATE CD

95.48 0.24%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 8 of 31 Item #10. Page 11
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1640
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB MI US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 226,405.98 0.00 -18,594.02 -7.59% 2,572.50 1.14% 0.18%01.0500% MAT 04/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD

92.24 0.24%
GOLD COAST BANK IL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 244,385.35 0.00 -614.65 -0.25% 6,370.00 2.61% 0.20%02.6000% MAT 02/28/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.74 0.26%
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK NY US 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 245,421.20 0.00 421.20 0.17% 7,227.50 2.96% 0.20%RT 02.9500% MAT 04/18/23FIXED RATE CD

99.59 0.26%
GREAT STHN BK MO US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 244,850.45 0.00 -149.55 -0.06% 11,025.00 4.51% 0.20%04.5000% MAT 10/20/25 FIXEDRATE CD

99.83 0.26%
GREENSTATE CREDIT IA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,108.50 0.00 -26,891.50 -10.98% 2,327.50 1.07% 0.18%00.9500% MAT 04/16/26 FIXEDRATE CD

88.95 0.23%
HOME LN INVT BK RI US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 219,418.78 0.00 -25,581.22 -10.44% 980.00 0.45% 0.18%00.4000% MAT 08/29/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.53 0.23%
HOME SAVINGS BANK UT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 242,884.04 0.00 -2,115.96 -0.86% 6,982.50 2.91% 0.20%02.8500% MAT 02/12/24 FIXEDRATE CD

98.05 0.25%
HORIZON BK NE US RT 01.3000% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 227,585.06 0.00 -17,414.94 -7.11% 3,185.00 1.40% 0.19%MAT 04/15/25 FIXED RATE CD

92.84 0.24%
JPMORGAN CHASE BK OH US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 221,126.23 0.00 -23,873.77 -9.74% 1,715.00 0.78% 0.18%00.7000% MAT 09/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD

90.08 0.23%
LAFAYETTE FED CRED MD US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 232,308.16 0.00 -12,691.84 -5.18% 7,962.50 3.43% 0.19%03.2500% MAT 06/15/27 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE

94.70 0.24%
LIVE OAK BKG CO NC US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 214,395.51 0.00 -30,604.49 -12.49% 1,960.00 0.91% 0.17%00.8000% MAT 08/13/26 FIXEDRATE CD

87.45 0.22%
MCHENRY SVGS BK IL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 232,176.70 0.00 -12,823.30 -5.23% 4,287.50 1.85% 0.19%01.7500% MAT 11/29/24 FIXEDRATE CD

94.77 0.24%
MECHANICS COOPERAT MA US 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 245,023.69 0.00 23.69 0.01% 6,247.50 2.55% 0.20%RT 02.5500% MAT 02/06/23FIXED RATE CD

99.84 0.26%
MEDALLION BK UT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 221,082.36 0.00 -23,917.64 -9.76% 1,347.50 0.61% 0.18%00.5500% MAT 07/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD

90.19 0.23%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 9 of 31 Item #10. Page 12
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1641
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
MEMBERSOURCE CR UN TX US 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 246,007.12 0.00 1,007.12 0.41% 11,270.00 4.60% 0.20%RT 04.6000% MAT 05/04/23CREDIT UNION SHARE CERT 100.10 0.26%
MERRICK BK UT US RT 01.6500% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 239,406.88 0.00 -5,593.12 -2.28% 4,042.50 1.69% 0.19%MAT 10/31/23 FIXED RATE CD

97.59 0.25%
METRO CREDIT UNION MA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,891.36 0.00 -26,108.64 -10.66% 4,165.00 1.91% 0.18%01.7000% MAT 02/18/27 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE

89.21 0.23%
MONEY ONE FED CRED MD US 248,000.00 102.58 254,407.26 238,631.82 -7,857.84 -15,775.44 -6.20% 4,960.00 2.09% 0.19%RT 02.0000% MAT 09/23/24FIXED RATE CD

95.69 0.25%
MORGAN STANLEY BK UT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 247,916.74 0.00 2,916.74 1.19% 6,492.50 2.65% 0.20%02.6500% MAT 01/11/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.95 0.26%
MORGAN STANLEY PRV NY US 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 236,630.43 0.00 -8,369.57 -3.42% 4,900.00 2.09% 0.19%RT 02.0000% MAT 08/22/24FIXED RATE CD

95.88 0.25%
MORTON CMNTY BK IL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 223,102.97 0.00 -21,897.03 -8.94% 1,470.00 0.66% 0.18%00.6000% MAT 06/19/25 FIXEDRATE CD

91.05 0.23%
NEIGHBORS FED CRED LA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 244,796.11 0.00 -203.89 -0.08% 8,085.00 3.33% 0.20%03.3000% MAT 09/28/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.09 0.26%
NEW YORK CMNTY BK NY US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 215,509.45 0.00 -29,490.55 -12.04% 1,715.00 0.80% 0.18%00.7000% MAT 07/01/26 FIXEDRATE CD

87.61 0.23%
OCEANFIRST BK NA NJ US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 240,156.12 0.00 -4,843.88 -1.98% 7,962.50 3.32% 0.20%03.2500% MAT 07/01/24 FIXEDRATE CD

98.01 0.25%
PACIFIC CREST SVGS WA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 226,883.09 0.00 -18,116.91 -7.39% 2,940.00 1.30% 0.18%01.2000% MAT 04/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD

92.51 0.24%
PACIFIC WSTN BK CA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 228,530.36 0.00 -16,469.64 -6.72% 3,307.50 1.45% 0.19%01.3500% MAT 04/16/25 FIXEDRATE CD

93.00 0.24%
PENTAGON FED CREDI VA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,697.37 0.00 -26,302.63 -10.74% 4,165.00 1.91% 0.18%01.7000% MAT 02/18/27 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT

89.21 0.23%
PRIME ALLIANCE BK UT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 243,473.65 0.00 -1,526.35 -0.62% 7,840.00 3.22% 0.20%03.2000% MAT 06/29/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.38 0.25%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 10 of 31 Item #10. Page 13
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1642
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
RAYMOND JAMES BK N FL US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 233,476.44 0.00 -11,523.56 -4.70% 4,410.00 1.89% 0.19%01.8000% MAT 11/08/24 FIXEDRATE CD

95.05 0.24%
SALLIE MAE BANK UT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 243,555.37 0.00 -1,444.63 -0.59% 8,207.50 3.42% 0.20%03.3500% MAT 08/05/24 FIXEDRATE CD

98.05 0.25%
SAN FRANCISCO FED CA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 226,786.77 0.00 -18,213.23 -7.43% 2,695.00 1.19% 0.18%01.1000% MAT 03/27/25 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE

92.56 0.24%
SAVOY BK NY US RT 00.8000% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 224,251.12 0.00 -20,748.88 -8.47% 1,960.00 0.87% 0.18%MAT 05/13/25 FIXED RATE CD

91.50 0.23%
SOMERSET TRUST CO PA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 226,488.77 0.00 -18,511.23 -7.56% 2,450.00 1.08% 0.18%01.0000% MAT 03/19/25 FIXEDRATE CD

92.42 0.24%
SPRING BK NY US RT 02.7500% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 243,787.42 0.00 -1,212.58 -0.49% 6,737.50 2.76% 0.20%MAT 04/27/23 FIXED RATE CD

99.49 0.25%
STATE BANK OF INDI NY US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,834.60 0.00 -26,165.40 -10.68% 2,205.00 1.01% 0.18%00.9000% MAT 03/25/26 FIXEDRATE CD

89.09 0.23%
STOCKMAN BK MT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 224,974.27 0.00 -20,025.73 -8.17% 1,470.00 0.65% 0.18%00.6000% MAT 06/10/25 FIXEDRATE CD

91.80 0.23%
SYNCHRONY BANK UT US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 232,905.69 0.00 -12,094.31 -4.94% 4,900.00 2.12% 0.19%02.0000% MAT 03/25/25 FIXEDRATE CD

94.54 0.24%
TEXAS EXCHANGE BK TX US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,250.56 0.00 -26,749.44 -10.92% 1,470.00 0.67% 0.18%00.6000% MAT 10/23/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.07 0.23%
THIRD FED S&L ASSN OH US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 233,687.48 0.00 -11,312.52 -4.62% 4,777.50 2.05% 0.19%01.9500% MAT 11/25/24 FIXEDRATE CD

95.20 0.24%
TOYOTA FINL SVG BK NV US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 218,073.69 0.00 -26,926.31 -10.99% 2,205.00 1.01% 0.18%00.9000% MAT 04/22/26 FIXEDRATE CD

88.84 0.23%
UBS BANK UT US RT 00.8500% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 215,955.92 0.00 -29,044.08 -11.85% 2,082.50 0.96% 0.18%MAT 06/16/26 FIXED RATE CD

88.12 0.23%
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IA US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 244,505.44 0.00 -494.56 -0.20% 7,350.00 3.01% 0.20%03.0000% MAT 04/28/23 FIXEDRATE CD

99.57 0.26%
USALLIANCE FED CRE NY US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 219,363.20 0.00 -25,636.80 -10.46% 1,225.00 0.56% 0.18%00.5000% MAT 09/29/25 FIXEDRATE CD

89.54 0.23%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 11 of 31 Item #10. Page 14
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1643
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
VALLEY STRONG CRED CA US RT 240,000.00 100.00 240,000.00 234,063.52 0.00 -5,936.48 -2.47% 6,840.00 2.92% 0.19%02.8500% MAT 06/21/24 FIXEDRATE CD

97.46 0.24%
VYSTAR CREDIT UNIO FL US RT 205,000.00 102.83 210,809.05 203,726.95 -13,008.19 -7,082.10 -3.36% 7,482.50 3.68% 0.17%03.6500% MAT 12/11/23 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE

99.09 0.21%
WEBBANK UT US RT 00.3500% 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 230,853.03 0.00 -14,146.97 -5.77% 857.50 0.37% 0.19%MAT 05/28/24 FIXED RATE CD

94.20 0.24%
WELLS FARGO NATL B NV US RT 245,000.00 100.00 245,000.00 245,345.42 0.00 345.42 0.14% 4,532.50 1.85% 0.15%01.8500% MAT 12/30/22 FIXEDRATE CD

99.99 0.26%
Total US Fixed Income $19,408,374.34 $18,292,904.29 $-21,124.96 $-1,115,470.05 -5.75% $347,518.50 19.10% 1.90% 14.88% Government
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,863,557.78 0.00 -136,442.22 -6.82% 19,400.00 1.04% 1.52%00.970 % DUE 120924 DTD120921 FC 06092022

93.12 1.95%
FFCB BOND 00.210 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,909,013.33 0.00 -90,986.67 -4.55% 4,200.00 0.22% 1.55%122123 DTD 122120 FC06212021

95.45 1.99%
FFCB BOND 00.440 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,862,966.67 0.00 -137,033.33 -6.85% 8,800.00 0.47% 1.52%092324 DTD 092321 FC03232022

93.03 1.95%
FFCB BOND 00.600 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,820,613.33 0.00 -179,386.67 -8.97% 12,000.00 0.66% 1.48%061625 DTD 061621 FC12162021

91.01 1.90%
FFCB BOND 00.600 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,790,926.67 0.00 -209,073.33 -10.45% 12,000.00 0.67% 1.46%112425 DTD 112420 FC05242021

89.49 1.87%
FFCB BOND 00.610 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,822,520.00 0.00 -177,480.00 -8.87% 12,200.00 0.67% 1.48%052325 DTD 082321 FC11232021

91.07 1.90%
FFCB BOND 00.660 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,808,993.33 0.00 -191,006.67 -9.55% 13,200.00 0.73% 1.47%091525 DTD 091521 FC03152022

90.26 1.89%
FFCB BOND 00.680 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,819,411.11 0.00 -180,588.89 -9.03% 13,600.00 0.75% 1.48%051925 DTD 051921 FC11192021

90.90 1.90%
FFCB BOND 00.710 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,821,582.22 0.00 -178,417.78 -8.92% 14,200.00 0.78% 1.48%042125 DTD 042121 FC10212021

90.95 1.90%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 12 of 31 Item #10. Page 15
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1644
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
FFCB BOND 01.840 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,826,860.00 0.00 -173,140.00 -8.66% 36,800.00 2.03% 1.49%012627 DTD 012622 FC07262022

90.56 1.91%
FFCB NTS 00.940 % DUE 092826 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,759,252.22 0.00 -240,747.78 -12.04% 18,800.00 1.07% 1.43%DTD 092821 FC 03282022

87.73 1.84%
FHLB BOND 00.625 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,816,995.28 0.00 -183,004.72 -9.15% 12,500.00 0.69% 1.48%063025 DTD 063021 FC12302021

90.54 1.90%
FHLB BOND 01.050 % DUE 1,000,000.00 96.84 968,385.25 893,176.67 0.00 -75,208.58 -7.77% 10,500.00 1.18% 0.73%081326 DTD 081321 FC02132022

88.92 0.93%
FHLB BOND 01.780 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,815,705.56 0.00 -184,294.44 -9.21% 35,600.00 1.98% 1.48%021027 DTD 021022 FC08102022

90.10 1.90%
FHLB BOND 02.010 % DUE 3,215,000.00 95.65 3,075,098.40 2,941,510.66 0.00 -133,587.73 -4.34% 64,621.50 2.21% 2.37%022527 DTD 022522 FC08252022

90.80 3.07%
FHLB BOND 05.450 % DUE 490,000.00 0.00 0.00 490,782.07 0.00 0.00 0.00% 26,705.00 5.45% 0.40%031627 DTD 121622 FC03162023

99.96 0.51%
FHLB BOND STEP-UP 00.750 % 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,801,178.33 0.00 -198,821.67 -9.94% 15,000.00 0.84% 1.47%DUE 063026 DTD 063021 FC12302021

89.69 1.88%
FHLB NTS 0.7500% DUE 063026 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,811,098.33 0.00 -188,901.67 -9.45% 15,000.00 0.83% 1.47%DTD 063021 FC 12302021

90.18 1.89%
FHLB NTS 0.7500% DUE 082626 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,780,805.00 0.00 -219,195.00 -10.96% 15,000.00 0.84% 1.45%DTD 082621 FC 02262022

88.78 1.86%
FHLB NTS 1.0500% DUE 033026 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,816,951.67 0.00 -183,048.33 -9.15% 21,000.00 1.16% 1.48%DTD 033021 FC 09302021

90.59 1.90%
FHLMC MED TERM NTS 00.500 1,000,000.00 99.85 998,500.00 906,146.67 0.00 -92,353.33 -9.25% 5,000.00 0.55% 0.74%% DUE 072325 DTD 072320 FC01232021

90.40 0.95%
FHLMC MED TERM NTS 00.730 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,823,737.22 0.00 -176,262.78 -8.81% 14,600.00 0.80% 1.48%% DUE 052825 DTD 052820 FC11282020

91.12 1.90%
FHLMC MED TERM NTS 03.050 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,956,709.44 0.00 -43,290.56 -2.16% 61,000.00 3.12% 1.59%% DUE 062824 DTD 062822 FC12282022

97.83 2.04%
FNMA NTS 00.500 % DUE 1,000,000.00 100.00 999,950.00 902,015.00 0.00 -97,935.00 -9.79% 5,000.00 0.56% 0.73%081425 DTD 081420 FC02142021

90.01 0.94%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 13 of 31 Item #10. Page 16
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1645
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
FNMA NTS 00.540 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,794,560.00 0.00 -205,440.00 -10.27% 10,800.00 0.60% 1.46%102725 DTD 102720 FC04272021

89.64 1.87%
FNMA NTS 00.560 % DUE 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,791,706.67 0.00 -208,293.33 -10.41% 11,200.00 0.63% 1.46%111725 DTD 111720 FC05172021

89.52 1.87%
INTL FIN CORP NTS 00.500 % 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,805,522.22 0.00 -194,477.78 -9.72% 10,000.00 0.55% 1.47%DUE 051526 DTD 052821 FC11152021

90.22 1.89%
US TSY NOTE 01.125 % DUE 1,000,000.00 98.21 982,052.13 897,423.56 0.00 -84,628.57 -8.62% 11,250.00 1.26% 0.73%10/31/26 DTD 10/31/21 FC04/30/22

89.56 0.94%
US TSY NOTE 01.750 % DUE 1,500,000.00 97.67 1,465,036.50 1,438,102.34 0.00 -26,934.16 -1.84% 26,250.00 1.84% 1.17%12/31/24 DTD 12/31/19 FC06/30/20

95.01 1.50%
US TSY NOTE 02.375 % DUE 1,000,000.00 99.71 997,067.75 974,597.17 0.00 -22,470.58 -2.25% 23,750.00 2.46% 0.79%08/15/24 DTD 08/15/14 FC02/15/15

96.58 1.02%
Total Government $53,486,090.03 $49,564,420.52 $0.00 $-4,412,451.57 -8.25% $559,976.50 51.76% 1.13% 40.31% Municipals
SULPHUR SPRINGS CAL UNI TAX 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 254,072.39 0.00 0.00 0.00% 12,872.50 5.11% 0.21%SR F BE/R/ 5.149 090124DTD 110322 100.83 0.27%
Total Municipals $0.00 $254,072.39 $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $12,872.50 5.11% 0.27% 0.21%Corporate IG Credit AMAZON COM INC NTS B/E 1,000,000.00 100.24 1,002,361.36 915,307.78 -2,461.32 -87,053.58 -8.68% 8,000.00 0.87% 0.75%00.800% 060325 DTD060320CALL@MW+10BP

91.47 0.96%
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 2,026,000.00 101.76 2,061,716.35 1,888,135.20 -34,728.57 -173,581.15 -8.42% 29,377.00 1.56% 1.54%01.450% 051525 DTD051520FC111520 CALL@MW+20BP

93.02 1.97%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NTS 2,000,000.00 99.49 1,989,860.00 1,780,540.00 0.00 -209,320.00 -10.52% 18,000.00 1.01% 1.45%00.900% 031126 DTD121120FC031121 CALL@MW+10BP

88.76 1.86%
COMCAST CORP NEW B/E 1,000,000.00 106.76 1,067,643.81 978,252.50 -51,496.92 -89,391.31 -8.37% 33,750.00 3.49% 0.80%03.375% 081525 DTD052715FC081515 CALL@MW+20BP

96.57 1.02%
E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS 2,141,000.00 101.89 2,181,428.22 1,996,620.47 -25,365.41 -184,807.75 -8.47% 36,397.00 1.84% 1.62%01.700% 071525 DTD051520FC011521 CALL@MW+25BP

92.48 2.09%
(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 14 of 31 Item #10. Page 17
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1646
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
HONEYWELL INTL NTS B/E 1,122,000.00 102.02 1,144,657.90 1,089,620.33 -36,386.38 -55,037.57 -4.81% 25,806.00 2.39% 0.89%02.300% 081524 DTD080819CALL@MW+10BP

96.26 1.14%
IBM CORP NTS B/E 03.000% 1,664,000.00 102.99 1,713,678.57 1,627,802.45 -89,148.82 -85,876.12 -5.01% 49,920.00 3.08% 1.32%051524 DTD051519 FC111519CALL@MW+15BP

97.46 1.70%
INTEL CORP NTS B/E 03.400% 1,054,000.00 106.30 1,120,443.46 1,036,438.02 -67,243.50 -84,005.44 -7.50% 35,836.00 3.49% 0.84%032525 DTD032520CALL@MW+45BP

97.45 1.08%
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 1,124,000.00 103.08 1,158,595.09 1,079,647.58 -34,420.63 -78,947.51 -6.81% 23,042.00 2.16% 0.88%02.050% 010925 DTD010920FC070920 NTS B/E

95.09 1.13%
JOHN DEERE CPTL CORP 2,000,000.00 100.12 2,002,403.01 1,788,617.78 -1,499.16 -213,785.23 -10.68% 14,000.00 0.79% 1.45%00.700% 011526 DTD010721FC071521 MED TERM NTS

89.11 1.87%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1,200,000.00 100.00 1,200,000.00 1,042,852.00 0.00 -157,148.00 -13.10% 9,600.00 0.92% 0.85%00.800% 022626 DTD022621FC082621 MED TERM NTS

86.63 1.09%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO B/E 1,017,000.00 104.17 1,059,454.45 996,336.26 -50,453.97 -63,118.19 -5.96% 31,781.25 3.23% 0.81%03.125% 012325 DTD012315FC072315

96.61 1.04%
MASTERCARD INC NTS B/E 2,000,000.00 101.88 2,037,510.70 1,905,808.89 -45,176.53 -131,701.81 -6.46% 40,000.00 2.11% 1.55%02.000% 030325 DTD120319FC030320 CALL@MW+10BP

94.65 1.99%
MICROSOFT CORP B/E 02.700% 1,000,000.00 104.51 1,045,149.68 970,495.00 -49,279.11 -74,654.68 -7.14% 27,000.00 2.81% 0.79%021225 DTD021215 FC081215CALL@MW+12.5BP

96.02 1.01%
MORGAN STANLEY FIN LLC 2,000,000.00 100.00 2,000,000.00 1,660,916.67 0.00 -339,083.33 -16.95% 21,000.00 1.27% 1.35%01.050% 082726 DTD082721FC022722 MED TERM NTS

82.69 1.73%
TARGET CORP NTS B/E 02.250% 2,000,000.00 103.14 2,062,811.37 1,909,150.00 -69,563.96 -153,661.37 -7.45% 45,000.00 2.37% 1.55%041525 DTD033120 FC101520CALL@MW+30BP

95.00 1.99%
TOYOTA MOTOR CRDT CORP 2,000,000.00 99.45 1,988,920.00 1,866,120.56 0.00 -122,799.44 -6.17% 12,500.00 0.67% 1.52%00.625% 091324 DTD091321FC031322 NTS B/E

93.12 1.95%
TRUIST BANK NTS B/E 02.150% 1,386,000.00 101.57 1,407,719.40 1,321,403.54 -30,660.66 -86,315.86 -6.13% 29,799.00 2.26% 1.07%120624 DTD120619 FC060620

95.20 1.38%
UNITED HEALTH GROUP INC 2,000,000.00 100.16 2,003,250.96 1,792,311.11 -1,511.67 -210,939.85 -10.53% 23,000.00 1.29% 1.46%01.150% 051526 DTD051921FC111521 CALL@MW+07.50BP

89.48 1.87%
Total Corporate IG Credit $30,247,604.33 $27,646,376.14 $-589,396.61 $-2,601,228.19 -8.60% $513,808.25 28.87% 1.86% 22.49% (1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 15 of 31 Item #10. Page 18
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1647
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Portfolio holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued) Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss
Quantity (%)
Current
Cost basis ($) yield (%)
Est. annual
income ($)
Purchase
price ($) /
Avg Price Market value ($)
Amort/Accr.($)
Fixed Income as of 12/29/2022
Price on
12/29/2022
($)
% of
Fixed
Income
% of
Portfolio
US
Total US $103,142,068.70 $95,757,773.34 $-610,521.57 $-8,129,149.81 -7.88% $1,434,175.75 100.00 1.50% 77.89% Total Fixed Income $103,142,068.70 $95,757,773.34 $-610,521.57 $-8,129,149.81 -7.88% $1,434,175.75 100.00 1.50% 77.89% Total Portfolio $130,311,262.68 $122,932,593.45 $-8,129,149.81 -6.24% $1,434,411.44 1.17% 100% 100% Unrealized
gain/loss
(%)
Unrealized
gain/loss ($)
% of
asset
class
Est. annual
Cost basis ($) income ($)
Current
Market value ($) yield (%)
% of
Portfolio
Total accrued interest (included in market values): $335,959.81(1) Assets held at other financial institutions are included in this report. We have not verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness of this information.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 16 of 31 Item #10. Page 19
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1648
Bond holdings
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
as of December 29, 2022Summary of bond holdingsMaturityYear Yield to
maturity (%)
Yield to
worst (%)
Unrealized
Issues gain/loss ($) Mkt. value ($)
Est. annual
income ($)
Adjusted
cost basis ($)
Modified
duration
Current
Quantity yield (%) % of bond portfolio maturing
2022 1 245,000 4,532.50 1.85% 4.03 % 4.03 % 0.00 245,000 -14.70 245,345.422023 17 5,880,000 116,175.00 2.02% 4.58 % 4.58 % 0.58 5,885,809.05 -123,592.25 5,774,086.032024 28 19,304,000 362,550.50 1.97% 4.68 % 4.68 % 1.61 19,105,487.38 -682,745.12 18,486,535.892025 50 43,085,000 515,583.75 1.30% 4.62 % 4.62 % 2.38 43,518,794.85 -3,881,909.55 39,768,198.772026 25 26,140,000 242,575.00 1.05% 4.83 % 4.83 % 3.29 26,085,951.35 -2,875,486.40 23,283,393.572027 9 8,930,000 192,759.00 2.37% 4.52 % 4.52 % 3.87 8,301,026.07 -156,507.15 8,200,213.672028 0 0 NA NA NA2029 0 0 NA NA NA2030 0 0 NA NA NA2031 0 0 NA NA NA2032 0 0 NA NA NA2033 0 0 NA NA NA2034 0 0 NA NA NA2035 0 0 NA NA NA2036 0 0 NA NA NA2037 0 0 NA NA NA2038 0 0 NA NA NA2039 0 0 NA NA NA2040 0 0 NA NA NA2041 0 0 NA NA NA2042 0 0 NA NA NA2043 0 0 NA NA NA2044 0 0 NA NA NA2045 0 0 NA NA NA2046 0 0 NA NA NA2047 0 0 NA NA NA2048 0 0 NA NA NA2049 0 0 NA NA NA2050 0 0 NA NA NA2051 0 0 NA NA NA2051 + 0 0 NA NA NAOther 0 0 NA NA NATotal 130 103,584,000 $1,434,175.75 1.50% 4.65 % 4.65 % 2.39 $103,142,068.70 $-7,720,255.17 $95,757,773.34Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 17 of 31 Item #10. Page 20
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1649
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
Call date/
Coupon Call price ($)
Modified
duration
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Quantity Curr. yield (%)
Effective
maturity
% of
bond
port.

Market
price ($)
Details of bond holdings

4.65%4.65%
07/28/2025 NA 2.39 $103,142,068. NA $95,421,813.53
$-7,720,255.17
103,584,00

1.50% $335,959.81

1.41% $1,434,175.75 100%
$95,757,773.34
Total Bond PortfolioMaturing 2022
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 99.994
360.12

1.85%

1.85% -14.70
12/30/2022 0.00 244,985.30 0.26%

4.03%
WELLS FARGO NATL B NV US RT 4,532.50 4.03%01.8500% MAT 12/30/22 FIXEDRATE CD /NV CD
Total 2022 245,000 1.85% 12/30/2022 $4,532.50

1.85%

4.03%4.03%

0.00 $245,000.00
$-14.70
$244,985.30
$360.12

0.26%
Maturing 2023
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 99.949
3,041.69

2.65%

2.65% -124.95
01/11/2023 0.04 244,875.05 0.26%

4.03%
MORGAN STANLEY BK UT US RT 6,492.50 4.03%02.6500% MAT 01/11/23 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.842
410.79

2.55%

2.55% -387.10
02/06/2023 0.11 244,612.90 0.26%

4.03%
MECHANICS COOPERAT MA US RT 6,247.50 4.03%02.5500% MAT 02/06/23 FIXEDRATE CD /MA CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.742

17.45 2.60%

2.61% -632.10
02/28/2023 0.17 244,367.90 0.26%

4.15%
GOLD COAST BANK IL US RT 6,370.00 4.15%02.6000% MAT 02/28/23 FIXEDRATE CD /IL CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.650
1,740.84

2.85%

2.86% -857.50
03/29/2023 0.24 244,142.50 0.26%

4.25%
CITIBANK NA SD US RT 02.8500% 6,982.50 4.25%MAT 03/29/23 FIXED RATE CD /SD CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.590
1,425.70

2.95%

2.96% -1,004.50
04/18/2023 0.30 243,995.50 0.26%

4.30%
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK NY US RT 7,227.50 4.30%02.9500% MAT 04/18/23 FIXEDRATE CD /NY CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.525
166.13

2.75%

2.76% -1,163.75
04/20/2023 0.30 243,836.25 0.26%

4.31%
ANN ARBOR ST BK MI US RT 6,737.50 4.31%02.7500% MAT 04/20/23 FIXEDRATE CD /MI CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.490

36.92 2.75%

2.76% -1,249.50
04/27/2023 0.32 243,750.50 0.26%

4.33%
SPRING BK NY US RT 02.7500% 6,737.50 4.33%MAT 04/27/23 FIXED RATE CD /NY CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.568
563.84

3.00%

3.01% -1,058.40
04/28/2023 0.33 243,941.60 0.26%

4.33%
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IA US RT 7,350.00 4.33%03.0000% MAT 04/28/23 FIXEDRATE CD /IA CD
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 18 of 31 Item #10. Page 21
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1650
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2023 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 100.096
771.92

4.60%

4.60% 235.20
05/04/2023 0.34 245,235.20 0.26%

4.32%
MEMBERSOURCE CR UN TX US RT 11,270.00 4.32%04.6000% MAT 05/04/23 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT /TX CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.478
221.51

3.00%

3.02% -1,278.90
05/18/2023 0.38 243,721.10 0.26%

4.38%
CELTIC BK UT US RT 03.0000% 7,350.00 4.38%MAT 05/18/23 FIXED RATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.485

83.23 3.10%

3.12% -1,261.75
05/25/2023 0.40 243,738.25 0.26%

4.39%
COMMERCIAL BK TN US RT 7,595.00 4.39%03.1000% MAT 05/25/23 FIXEDRATE CD /TN CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.377

0.00 3.20%

3.22% -1,526.35
06/29/2023 0.49 243,473.65 0.26%

4.47%
PRIME ALLIANCE BK UT US RT 7,840.00 4.47%03.2000% MAT 06/29/23 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.085
2,037.86

3.30%

3.33% -2,241.75
09/28/2023 0.72 242,758.25 0.25%

4.55%
NEIGHBORS FED CRED LA US RT 8,085.00 4.55%03.3000% MAT 09/28/23 FIXEDRATE CD /LA CD
245,000 245,000.00 97.586
321.18

1.65%

1.69% -5,914.30
10/31/2023 NA 239,085.70 0.25%
NA
MERRICK BK UT US RT 01.6500% 4,042.50 NAMAT 10/31/23 FIXED RATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 97.400
342.33

1.70%

1.75% -6,370.00
11/29/2023 0.89 238,630.00 0.25%

4.62%
BAY ST SVGS BK MA US RT 4,165.00 4.62%01.7000% MAT 11/29/23 FIXEDRATE CD /MA CD
205,000 210,809.05 99.089
594.50

3.65%

3.68% -7,676.60
12/11/2023 0.93 203,132.45 0.21%

4.63%
VYSTAR CREDIT UNIO FL US RT 7,482.50 4.63%03.6500% MAT 12/11/23 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE /FL CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 95.446

93.33 0.21%

0.22% -91,080.00
12/21/2023 0.95 1,908,920.00 2.00%

5.04%
4,200.00 5.04%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.210 % DUE 122123 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 122120 FC 06212021 Total 2023 5,880,000 2.00% 08/08/2023 $116,175.00

2.02%

4.58%4.58%

0.58 $5,885,809.05
$-123,592.25
$5,762,216.80
$11,869.23

6.04%
Maturing 2024
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 98.051
2,659.09

2.85%

2.91% -4,775.05
02/12/2024 1.08 240,224.95 0.25%

4.65%
HOME SAVINGS BANK UT US RT 6,982.50 4.65%02.8500% MAT 02/12/24 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 98.026
267.82

2.85%

2.91% -4,836.30
02/15/2024 1.11 240,163.70 0.25%

4.65%
BANK OF NEW ENGLAN NH US RT 6,982.50 4.65%02.8500% MAT 02/15/24 FIXEDRATE CD /NH CD
245,000 245,000.00 97.999
172.17

2.85%

2.91% -4,902.45
02/21/2024 1.12 240,097.55 0.25%

4.65%
FIRST N/B MCGREG TX US RT 6,982.50 4.65%02.8500% MAT 02/21/24 FIXEDRATE CD /TX CD
245,000 245,000.00 96.932
1,033.70

2.20%

2.27% -7,516.60
04/17/2024 1.26 237,483.40 0.25%

4.65%
BEAL BANK - PLANO TX US RT 5,390.00 4.65%02.2000% MAT 04/17/24 FIXEDRATE CD /TX CD
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 19 of 31 Item #10. Page 22
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1651
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2024 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
1,664,000 1,713,678.57 97.458
6,101.33

3.00%

3.08% -91,977.45
05/15/2024 1.32 1,621,701.12 1.70%

4.93%
49,920.00 4.93%

NR/NR/NR
IBM CORP NTS B/E 03.000% A3/WD/A051524 DTD051519 FC111519CALL@MW+15BP 245,000 245,000.00 94.073

58.40 0.30%

0.32% -14,521.15
05/28/2024 1.40 230,478.85 0.24%

4.65%
CONNEXUS CREDIT UN WI US RT 735.00 4.65%00.3000% MAT 05/28/24 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT /WI CD
245,000 245,000.00 94.196

72.83 0.35%

0.37% -14,219.80
05/28/2024 01/28/2023 1.38 230,780.20 0.24%

4.64%4.64%
100.00
WEBBANK UT US RT 00.3500% 857.50MAT 05/28/24 FIXED RATE CD /UT CD
240,000 240,000.00 97.464
149.92

2.85%

2.92% -6,086.40
06/21/2024 01/21/2023 1.44 233,913.60 0.25%

4.63%4.63%
100.00
VALLEY STRONG CRED CA US RT 6,840.0002.8500% MAT 06/21/24 FIXEDRATE CD /CA CD
245,000 245,000.00 96.582
2,265.41

2.25%

2.33% -8,374.10
06/28/2024 1.45 236,625.90 0.25%

4.64%
COMMUNITYWIDE FED IN US RT 5,512.50 4.64%02.2500% MAT 06/28/24 FIXEDRATE CD /IN CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 97.827
169.44

3.05%

3.12% -43,460.00
06/28/2024 03/28/2023 1.44 1,956,540.00 2.05%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
61,000.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLMC MED TERM NTS 03.050 % Aaa/AAA/AA+DUE 062824 DTD 062822 FC12282022 245,000 245,000.00 98.014

21.82 3.25%

3.32% -4,865.70
07/01/2024 1.42 240,134.30 0.25%

4.63%
OCEANFIRST BK NA NJ US RT 7,962.50 4.63%03.2500% MAT 07/01/24 FIXEDRATE CD /NJ CD
245,000 245,000.00 98.052
3,327.97

3.35%

3.42% -4,772.60
08/05/2024 1.52 240,227.40 0.25%

4.62%
SALLIE MAE BANK UT US RT 8,207.50 4.62%03.3500% MAT 08/05/24 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
1,122,000 1,144,657.90 96.258
9,605.57

2.30%

2.39% -64,643.14
08/15/2024 07/15/2024 1.56 1,080,014.76 1.13%

4.71%4.71%
100.00
25,806.00

NR/NR/NR
HONEYWELL INTL NTS B/E 02.300% A2/A/A081524 DTD080819CALL@MW+10BP 1,000,000 997,067.75 96.582
8,777.17

2.38%

2.46% -31,247.75
08/15/2024 1.56 965,820.00 1.01%

4.57%
23,750.00 4.57%

NR/NR/NR
US TSY NOTE 02.375 % DUE Aaa/AAA/NR08/15/24 DTD 08/15/14 FC02/15/15 245,000 245,000.00 95.877
1,731.78

2.00%

2.09% -10,101.35
08/22/2024 1.58 234,898.65 0.25%

4.62%
MORGAN STANLEY PRV NY US RT 4,900.00 4.62%02.0000% MAT 08/22/24 FIXEDRATE CD /NY CD
245,000 245,000.00 95.555
360.12

1.85%

1.94% -10,890.25
08/30/2024 1.63 234,109.75 0.25%

4.62%
FIRST NATL BK KS US RT 01.8500% 4,532.50 4.62%MAT 08/30/24 FIXED RATE CD /KS CD
245,000 245,000.00 95.475
350.38

1.80%

1.89% -11,086.25
08/30/2024 1.64 233,913.75 0.25%

4.62%
FIRST ST BK AR US RT 01.8000% 4,410.00 4.62%MAT 08/30/24 FIXED RATE CD /AR CD
250,000 0.00 100.828
2,002.39

5.15%

5.11% 252,070.00
09/01/2024 1.56 252,070.00 0.26%

4.62%
12,872.50 4.62%

NR/NR/NR
SULPHUR SPRINGS CAL UNI TAX SR NR/NR/AAF BE/R/ 5.149 090124 DTD110322 /CA 2,000,000 1,988,920.00 93.122
3,680.56

0.63%

0.67% -126,480.00
09/13/2024 1.66 1,862,440.00 1.95%

4.88%
12,500.00 4.88%

NR/NR/NR
TOYOTA MOTOR CRDT CORP A1/A+/A+00.625% 091324 DTD091321FC031322 NTS B/EIncludes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 20 of 31 Item #10. Page 23
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1652
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2024 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 93.031
2,346.67

0.44%

0.47% -139,380.00
09/23/2024 1.69 1,860,620.00 1.95%

4.67%
8,800.00 4.67%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.440 % DUE 092324 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 092321 FC 03232022 248,000 254,407.26 95.691
1,318.14

2.00%

2.09% -17,093.58
09/23/2024 1.67 237,313.68 0.25%

4.61%
MONEY ONE FED CRED MD US RT 4,960.00 4.61%02.0000% MAT 09/23/24 FIXEDRATE CD /MD CD
219,000 219,000.00 94.882
295.80

1.70%

1.79% -11,208.42
10/31/2024 NA 207,791.58 0.22%
NA
CITIZENS ST BK CLA WI US RT 3,723.00 NA01.7000% MAT 10/31/24 FIXEDRATE CD /WI CD
245,000 245,000.00 95.045
616.19

1.80%

1.89% -12,139.75
11/08/2024 1.79 232,860.25 0.24%

4.61%
RAYMOND JAMES BK N FL US RT 4,410.00 4.61%01.8000% MAT 11/08/24 FIXEDRATE CD /FL CD
245,000 245,000.00 95.201
445.03

1.95%

2.05% -11,757.55
11/25/2024 1.84 233,242.45 0.24%

4.60%
THIRD FED S&L ASSN OH US RT 4,777.50 4.60%01.9500% MAT 11/25/24 FIXEDRATE CD /OH CD
245,000 245,000.00 94.766

0.00 1.75%

1.85% -12,823.30
11/29/2024 1.88 232,176.70 0.24%

4.61%
MCHENRY SVGS BK IL US RT 4,287.50 4.61%01.7500% MAT 11/29/24 FIXEDRATE CD /IL CD
1,386,000 1,407,719.40 95.202
1,903.82

2.15%

2.26% -88,219.68
12/06/2024 11/06/2024 1.86 1,319,499.72 1.38%

4.77%4.77%
100.00
29,799.00

NR/NR/NR
TRUIST BANK NTS B/E 02.150% A2/A+/A120624 DTD120619 FC060620 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 93.124
1,077.78

0.97%

1.04% -137,520.00
12/09/2024 1.88 1,862,480.00 1.95%

4.71%
19,400.00 4.71%

NR/NR/NR
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK Aaa/AAA/AA+00.970 % DUE 120924 DTD120921 FC 06092022 1,500,000 1,465,036.50 95.008
12,982.34

1.75%

1.84% -39,916.50
12/31/2024 1.92 1,425,120.00 1.49%

4.38%
26,250.00 4.38%

NR/NR/NR
US TSY NOTE 01.750 % DUE NR/AAA/NR12/31/24 DTD 12/31/19 FC06/30/20 Total 2024 19,304,000 1.90% 09/02/2024 $362,550.50

1.97%

4.68%4.68%

1.61 $19,105,487.3
$-682,745.12
$18,422,742.26
$63,793.63

19.31%
Maturing 2025
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
1,124,000 1,158,595.09 95.086
10,880.94

2.05%

2.16% -89,828.45
01/09/2025 1.93 1,068,766.64 1.12%

4.62%
23,042.00 4.62%

NR/NR/NR
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP A2/A/A02.050% 010925 DTD010920FC070920 NTS B/E 1,017,000 1,059,454.45 96.614
13,771.88

3.13%

3.23% -76,890.07
01/23/2025 10/23/2024 1.94 982,564.38 1.03%

4.87%4.87%
100.00
31,781.25

NR/NR/NR
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO B/E A1/AA-/A03.125% 012325 DTD012315FC072315 1,000,000 1,045,149.68 96.022
10,275.00

2.70%

2.81% -84,929.68
02/12/2025 11/12/2024 2.00 960,220.00 1.01%

4.69%4.69%
100.00
27,000.00

NR/NR/NR
MICROSOFT CORP B/E 02.700% Aaa/AAA/AAA021225 DTD021215 FC081215CALL@MW+12.5BPIncludes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 21 of 31 Item #10. Page 24
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1653
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2025 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 93.845

21.48 1.60%

1.70% -15,079.75
02/27/2025 2.12 229,920.25 0.24%

4.59%
BELL ST B&T ND US RT 01.6000% 3,920.00 4.59%MAT 02/27/25 FIXED RATE CD /ND CD
245,000 245,000.00 93.947

22.15 1.65%

1.76% -14,829.85
02/27/2025 2.12 230,170.15 0.24%

4.59%
CITADEL FED CREDIT PA US RT 4,042.50 4.59%01.6500% MAT 02/27/25 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT /PA CD
2,000,000 2,037,510.70 94.646
12,888.89

2.00%

2.11% -144,590.70
03/03/2025 02/03/2025 2.08 1,892,920.00 1.98%

4.61%4.61%
100.00
40,000.00

NR/NR/NR
MASTERCARD INC NTS B/E Aa3/NR/A+02.000% 030325 DTD120319FC030320 CALL@MW+10BP 245,000 245,230.36 94.264
1,401.53

1.80%

1.91% -14,283.56
03/04/2025 2.09 230,946.80 0.24%

4.59%
BMW BANK NORTH AME UT US RT 4,410.00 4.59%01.8000% MAT 03/04/25 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 92.417

67.12 1.00%

1.08% -18,578.35
03/19/2025 2.19 226,421.65 0.24%

4.60%
SOMERSET TRUST CO PA US RT 2,450.00 4.60%01.0000% MAT 03/19/25 FIXEDRATE CD /PA CD
1,054,000 1,120,443.46 97.446
9,357.18

3.40%

3.49% -93,362.62
03/25/2025 02/25/2025 2.11 1,027,080.84 1.08%

4.61%4.61%
100.00
35,836.00

NR/NR/NR
INTEL CORP NTS B/E 03.400% A1/A+/A+032525 DTD032520CALL@MW+45BP 245,000 245,000.00 94.543
1,275.34

2.00%

2.12% -13,369.65
03/25/2025 2.14 231,630.35 0.24%

4.59%
SYNCHRONY BANK UT US RT 4,900.00 4.59%02.0000% MAT 03/25/25 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 92.560

14.77 1.10%

1.19% -18,228.00
03/27/2025 2.20 226,772.00 0.24%

4.60%
SAN FRANCISCO FED CA US RT 2,695.00 4.60%01.1000% MAT 03/27/25 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE /CA CD
245,000 245,000.00 92.842
122.16

1.30%

1.40% -17,537.10
04/15/2025 2.25 227,462.90 0.24%

4.59%
HORIZON BK NE US RT 01.3000% 3,185.00 4.59%MAT 04/15/25 FIXED RATE CD /NE CD
2,000,000 2,062,811.37 94.995
9,250.00

2.25%

2.37% -162,911.37
04/15/2025 03/15/2025 2.19 1,899,900.00 1.99%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
45,000.00

NR/NR/NR
TARGET CORP NTS B/E 02.250% A2/A/A041525 DTD033120 FC101520CALL@MW+30BP 245,000 245,000.00 93.004
670.56

1.35%

1.45% -17,140.20
04/16/2025 2.21 227,859.80 0.24%

4.59%
PACIFIC WSTN BK CA US RT 3,307.50 4.59%01.3500% MAT 04/16/25 FIXEDRATE CD /CA CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.945
2,682.22

0.71%

0.78% -181,100.00
04/21/2025 2.24 1,818,900.00 1.91%

4.90%
14,200.00 4.90%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.710 % DUE 042125 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 042121 FC 10212021 245,000 245,000.00 92.128
402.74

1.00%

1.09% -19,286.40
04/30/2025 2.26 225,713.60 0.24%

4.59%
CENTERSTATE BK NA FL US RT 2,450.00 4.59%01.0000% MAT 04/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD /FL CD
245,000 245,000.00 92.238
422.88

1.05%

1.14% -19,016.90
04/30/2025 2.26 225,983.10 0.24%

4.59%
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB MI US RT 2,572.50 4.59%01.0500% MAT 04/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD /MI CD
245,000 245,000.00 92.510
233.59

1.20%

1.30% -18,350.50
04/30/2025 2.29 226,649.50 0.24%

4.59%
PACIFIC CREST SVGS WA US RT 2,940.00 4.59%01.2000% MAT 04/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD /WA CD
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 22 of 31 Item #10. Page 25
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1654
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2025 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 91.496

85.92 0.80%

0.87% -20,834.80
05/13/2025 2.34 224,165.20 0.23%

4.59%
SAVOY BK NY US RT 00.8000% 1,960.00 4.59%MAT 05/13/25 FIXED RATE CD /NY CD
2,026,000 2,061,716.35 93.018
3,590.52

1.45%

1.56% -177,171.67
05/15/2025 2.29 1,884,544.68 1.97%

4.58%
29,377.00 4.58%

NR/NR/NR
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE A2/A/A01.450% 051525 DTD051520FC111520 CALL@MW+20BP 245,000 245,000.00 91.478

75.18 0.80%

0.87% -20,878.90
05/15/2025 2.34 224,121.10 0.23%

4.59%
ENCORE BANK AR US RT 00.8000% 1,960.00 4.59%MAT 05/15/25 FIXED RATE CD /AR CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.895
1,511.11

0.68%

0.75% -182,100.00
05/19/2025 2.32 1,817,900.00 1.91%

4.76%
13,600.00 4.76%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.680 % DUE 051925 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 051921 FC 11192021 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 91.065
1,220.00

0.61%

0.67% -178,700.00
05/23/2025 2.33 1,821,300.00 1.91%

4.58%
12,200.00 4.58%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.610 % DUE 052325 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 082321 FC 11232021 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 91.124
1,257.22

0.73%

0.80% -177,520.00
05/28/2025 02/28/2023 2.34 1,822,480.00 1.91%

4.66%4.66%
100.00
14,600.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLMC MED TERM NTS 00.730 % Aaa/AAA/NRDUE 052825 DTD 052820 FC11282020 1,000,000 1,002,361.36 91.473
577.78

0.80%

0.87% -87,631.36
06/03/2025 05/03/2025 2.35 914,730.00 0.96%

4.55%4.55%
100.00
8,000.00

NR/NR/NR
AMAZON COM INC NTS B/E A1/AA-/AA00.800% 060325 DTD060320CALL@MW+10BP 245,000 245,000.00 91.795

76.52 0.60%

0.65% -20,102.25
06/10/2025 2.38 224,897.75 0.24%

4.16%
STOCKMAN BK MT US RT 1,470.00 4.16%00.6000% MAT 06/10/25 FIXEDRATE CD /MT CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 91.009
433.33

0.60%

0.66% -179,820.00
06/16/2025 2.39 1,820,180.00 1.91%

4.50%
12,000.00 4.50%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.600 % DUE 061625 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 061621 FC 12162021 245,000 245,000.00 91.050

43.63 0.65%

0.71% -21,927.50
06/19/2025 2.44 223,072.50 0.23%

4.48%
ENERBANK UT US RT 00.6500% 1,592.50 4.48%MAT 06/19/25 FIXED RATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 91.046

40.27 0.60%

0.66% -21,937.30
06/19/2025 2.44 223,062.70 0.23%

4.43%
MORTON CMNTY BK IL US RT 1,470.00 4.43%00.6000% MAT 06/19/25 FIXEDRATE CD /IL CD
245,000 245,000.00 90.979

12.08 0.60%

0.66% -22,101.45
06/26/2025 2.46 222,898.55 0.23%

4.43%
FIRST CAROLINA BK NC US RT 1,470.00 4.43%00.6000% MAT 06/26/25 FIXEDRATE CD /NC CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.539
6,215.28

0.63%

0.69% -189,220.00
06/30/2025 06/30/2023 2.42 1,810,780.00 1.90%

4.67%4.67%
100.00
12,500.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB BOND 00.625 % DUE 063025 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 063021 FC 12302021 2,141,000 2,181,428.22 92.482
16,580.85

1.70%

1.84% -201,388.60
07/15/2025 06/15/2025 2.42 1,980,039.62 2.08%

4.88%4.88%
100.00
36,397.00

NR/NR/NR
E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS A3/A/A01.700% 071525 DTD051520FC011521 CALL@MW+25BP 1,000,000 998,500.00 90.398
2,166.67

0.50%

0.55% -94,520.00
07/23/2025 2.49 903,980.00 0.95%

4.50%
5,000.00 4.50%

NR/NR/NR
FHLMC MED TERM NTS 00.500 % Aaa/AAA/NRDUE 072325 DTD 072320 FC01232021 245,000 245,000.00 90.194
107.06

0.55%

0.61% -24,024.70
07/30/2025 2.55 220,975.30 0.23%

4.58%
MEDALLION BK UT US RT 1,347.50 4.58%00.5500% MAT 07/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD /UT CD
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 23 of 31 Item #10. Page 26
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1655
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2025 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
1,000,000 999,950.00 90.014
1,875.00

0.50%

0.56% -99,810.00
08/14/2025 08/14/2023 2.55 900,140.00 0.94%

4.58%4.58%
100.00
5,000.00

NR/NR/NR
FNMA NTS 00.500 % DUE 081425 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 081420 FC 02142021 1,000,000 1,067,643.81 96.569
12,562.50

3.38%

3.49% -101,953.81
08/15/2025 05/15/2025 2.44 965,690.00 1.01%

4.78%4.78%
100.00
33,750.00

NR/NR/NR
COMCAST CORP NEW B/E A3/A-/A03.375% 081525 DTD052715FC081515 CALL@MW+20BP 245,000 245,000.00 89.558

8.05 0.40%

0.45% -25,582.90
08/26/2025 2.63 219,417.10 0.23%

4.58%
COMMUNITY BK TN US RT 980.00 4.58%00.4000% MAT 08/26/25 FIXEDRATE CD /TN CD
245,000 245,000.00 89.538

2.68 0.40%

0.45% -25,631.90
08/28/2025 2.64 219,368.10 0.23%

4.58%
BANK3 TENNESSEE TN US RT 980.00 4.58%00.4000% MAT 08/28/25 FIXEDRATE CD /TN CD
245,000 245,000.00 89.528

75.18 0.40%

0.45% -25,656.40
08/29/2025 2.64 219,343.60 0.23%

4.58%
HOME LN INVT BK RI US RT 980.00 4.58%00.4000% MAT 08/29/25 FIXEDRATE CD /RI CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.259
3,813.33

0.66%

0.73% -194,820.00
09/15/2025 2.63 1,805,180.00 1.89%

4.52%
13,200.00 4.52%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.660 % DUE 091525 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 091521 FC 03152022 245,000 245,000.00 89.299

18.79 0.40%

0.45% -26,217.45
09/22/2025 03/22/2023 2.71 218,782.55 0.23%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
AMERICAN COMM BK GA US RT 980.0000.4000% MAT 09/22/25 FIXEDRATE CD /GA CD
108,000 108,000.00 89.403
101.49

0.35%

0.39% -11,444.76
09/22/2025 2.66 96,555.24 0.10%

4.51%
CHAMBERS BANK AK US RT 378.00 4.51%00.3500% MAT 09/22/25 FIXEDRATE CD /AK CD
245,000 245,000.00 89.536

0.00 0.50%

0.56% -25,636.80
09/29/2025 12/29/2022 2.70 219,363.20 0.23%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
USALLIANCE FED CRE NY US RT 1,225.0000.5000% MAT 09/29/25 FIXEDRATE CD /NY CD
245,000 245,000.00 90.083
422.88

0.70%

0.78% -24,296.65
09/30/2025 03/31/2023 2.67 220,703.35 0.23%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BK OH US RT 1,715.0000.7000% MAT 09/30/25 FIXEDRATE CD /OH CD
245,000 245,000.00 99.828
271.85

4.50%

4.51% -421.40
10/20/2025 04/20/2023 2.63 244,578.60 0.26%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
GREAT STHN BK MO US RT 11,025.0004.5000% MAT 10/20/25 FIXEDRATE CD /MO CD
245,000 245,000.00 89.072

24.16 0.60%

0.67% -26,773.60
10/23/2025 01/23/2023 2.78 218,226.40 0.23%

4.75%4.75%
100.00
TEXAS EXCHANGE BK TX US RT 1,470.0000.6000% MAT 10/23/25 FIXEDRATE CD /TX CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 89.635
1,860.00

0.54%

0.60% -207,300.00
10/27/2025 10/27/2023 2.74 1,792,700.00 1.88%

4.48%4.48%
100.00
10,800.00

NR/NR/NR
FNMA NTS 00.540 % DUE 102725 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 102720 FC 04272021 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 89.520
1,306.67

0.56%

0.63% -209,600.00
11/17/2025 11/17/2023 2.80 1,790,400.00 1.88%

4.47%4.47%
100.00
11,200.00

NR/NR/NR
FNMA NTS 00.560 % DUE 111725 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 111720 FC 05172021 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 89.488
1,166.67

0.60%

0.67% -210,240.00
11/24/2025 2.82 1,789,760.00 1.88%

4.50%
12,000.00 4.50%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 00.600 % DUE 112425 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 112420 FC 05242021 245,000 245,000.00 88.844

50.34 0.50%

0.56% -27,332.20
12/15/2025 2.88 217,667.80 0.23%

4.57%
BK HAPOALIM BM NY US RT 1,225.00 4.57%00.5000% MAT 12/15/25 FIXEDRATE CD /NY CD
Total 2025 43,085,000 1.22% 06/19/2025 $515,583.75

1.30%

4.62%4.62%

2.38 $43,518,794.8
$-3,881,909.55
$39,636,885.30
$131,313.47

41.54%
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 24 of 31 Item #10. Page 27
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1656
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2026 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
2,000,000 2,002,403.01 89.112
6,377.78

0.70%

0.79% -220,163.01
01/15/2026 2.94 1,782,240.00 1.87%

4.57%
14,000.00 4.57%

NR/NR/NR
JOHN DEERE CPTL CORP 00.700% A2/A/A011526 DTD010721 FC071521MED TERM NTS 1,200,000 1,200,000.00 86.631
3,280.00

0.80%

0.92% -160,428.00
02/26/2026 02/26/2024 3.03 1,039,572.00 1.09%

5.47%5.47%
100.00
9,600.00

NR/NR/NR
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 00.800% A1/AA-/A022626 DTD022621 FC082621MED TERM NTS 245,000 245,000.00 97.766
3,570.96

3.80%

3.89% -5,473.30
03/11/2026 01/11/2023 2.94 239,526.70 0.25%

4.56%4.56%
100.00
CFG COMMUNITY BANK MD US RT 9,310.0003.8000% MAT 03/11/26 FIXEDRATE CD /MD CD
2,000,000 1,989,860.00 88.757
5,400.00

0.90%

1.01% -214,720.00
03/11/2026 02/11/2026 3.08 1,775,140.00 1.86%

4.73%4.73%
100.00
18,000.00

NR/NR/NR
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NTS A2/A/A00.900% 031126 DTD121120FC031121 CALL@MW+10BP 245,000 245,000.00 88.796

59.07 0.80%

0.90% -27,449.80
03/18/2026 03/18/2023 3.14 217,550.20 0.23%

4.56%4.56%
100.00
BMO HARRIS BK NA IL US RT 1,960.0000.8000% MAT 03/18/26 FIXEDRATE CD /IL CD
245,000 245,000.00 89.086
573.90

0.90%

1.01% -26,739.30
03/25/2026 3.12 218,260.70 0.23%

4.56%
STATE BANK OF INDI NY US RT 2,205.00 4.56%00.9000% MAT 03/25/26 FIXEDRATE CD /NY CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.588
5,191.67

1.05%

1.16% -188,240.00
03/30/2026 NA 1,811,760.00 1.90%
NA
21,000.00 NA

NR/NR/NR
FHLB NTS 1.0500% DUE 033026 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 033021 FC 09302021 245,000 245,000.00 89.096
184.92

0.95%

1.07% -26,714.80
03/31/2026 12/31/2022 NA 218,285.20 0.23%
NANA
100.00
BANKUNITED NA FLOR FL US RT 2,327.5000.9500% MAT 03/31/26 FIXEDRATE CD /FL CD
245,000 245,000.00 88.951
178.55

0.95%

1.07% -27,070.05
04/16/2026 3.23 217,929.95 0.23%

4.57%
GREENSTATE CREDIT IA US RT 2,327.50 4.57%00.9500% MAT 04/16/26 FIXEDRATE CD /IA CD
245,000 245,000.00 88.842
410.79

0.90%

1.01% -27,337.10
04/22/2026 3.19 217,662.90 0.23%

4.57%
TOYOTA FINL SVG BK NV US RT 2,205.00 4.57%00.9000% MAT 04/22/26 FIXEDRATE CD /NV CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.215
1,222.22

0.50%

0.55% -195,700.00
05/15/2026 05/15/2023 NA 1,804,300.00 1.89%
NANA
100.00
10,000.00

NR/NR/NR
INTL FIN CORP NTS 00.500 % DUE Aaa/NR/AAA051526 DTD 052821 FC 11152021 2,000,000 2,003,250.96 89.475
2,811.11

1.15%

1.29% -213,750.96
05/15/2026 04/15/2026 3.24 1,789,500.00 1.88%

4.55%4.55%
100.00
23,000.00

NR/NR/NR
UNITED HEALTH GROUP INC A3/A/A+01.150% 051526 DTD051921FC111521 CALL@MW+07.50BP 245,000 245,000.00 88.115

74.17 0.85%

0.96% -29,118.25
06/16/2026 06/16/2023 3.40 215,881.75 0.23%

4.57%4.57%
100.00
UBS BANK UT US RT 00.8500% 2,082.50MAT 06/16/26 FIXED RATE CD /UT CD
245,000 245,000.00 96.760
4,336.84

3.55%

3.67% -7,938.00
06/30/2026 12/30/2022 3.19 237,062.00 0.25%

4.56%4.56%
100.00
ALLY BK UT US RT 03.5500% MAT 8,697.5006/30/26 FIXED RATE CD /UT CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 89.686
7,458.33

0.75%

0.84% -206,280.00
06/30/2026 12/30/2022 NA 1,793,720.00 1.88%
NANA
100.00
15,000.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB BOND STEP-UP 00.750 % DUE Aaa/NR/AA+063026 DTD 063021 FC 12302021 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.182
7,458.33

0.75%

0.83% -196,360.00
06/30/2026 12/30/2022 NA 1,803,640.00 1.89%
NANA
100.00
15,000.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB NTS 0.7500% DUE 063026 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 063021 FC 12302021Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 25 of 31 Item #10. Page 28
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1657
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2026 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
245,000 245,000.00 87.614
855.15

0.70%

0.80% -30,345.70
07/01/2026 3.37 214,654.30 0.22%

4.56%
NEW YORK CMNTY BK NY US RT 1,715.00 4.56%00.7000% MAT 07/01/26 FIXEDRATE CD /NY CD
1,000,000 968,385.25 88.921
3,966.67

1.05%

1.18% -79,175.25
08/13/2026 01/13/2023 3.47 889,210.00 0.93%

4.39%4.39%
100.00
10,500.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB BOND 01.050 % DUE 081326 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 081321 FC 02132022 245,000 245,000.00 87.447
150.36

0.80%

0.91% -30,754.85
08/13/2026 3.55 214,245.15 0.22%

4.57%
LIVE OAK BKG CO NC US RT 1,960.00 4.57%00.8000% MAT 08/13/26 FIXEDRATE CD /NC CD
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 88.784
5,125.00

0.75%

0.84% -224,320.00
08/26/2026 08/26/2023 NA 1,775,680.00 1.86%
NANA
100.00
15,000.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB NTS 0.7500% DUE 082626 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 082621 FC 02262022 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 82.690
7,116.67

1.05%

1.27% -346,200.00
08/27/2026 08/27/2023 3.47 1,653,800.00 1.73%

6.43%6.43%
100.00
21,000.00

NR/NR/NR
MORGAN STANLEY FIN LLC A1/A+/A01.050% 082726 DTD082721FC022722 MED TERM NTS 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 87.725
4,752.22

0.94%

1.07% -245,500.00
09/28/2026 3.59 1,754,500.00 1.84%

4.54%
18,800.00 4.54%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB NTS 00.940 % DUE 092826 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 092821 FC 03282022 1,000,000 982,052.13 89.559
1,833.56

1.13%

1.26% -86,462.13
10/31/2026 3.68 895,590.00 0.94%

4.09%
11,250.00 4.09%

NR/NR/NR
US TSY NOTE 01.125 % DUE NR/AAA/NR10/31/26 DTD 10/31/21 FC04/30/22 245,000 245,000.00 87.909
270.17

1.15%

1.31% -29,622.95
11/24/2026 3.73 215,377.05 0.23%

4.57%
CAPITAL ONE BK USA VA US RT 2,817.50 4.57%01.1500% MAT 11/24/26 FIXEDRATE CD /VA CD
245,000 245,000.00 87.909
270.17

1.15%

1.31% -29,622.95
11/24/2026 3.73 215,377.05 0.23%

4.57%
CAPITAL ONE NA VA US RT 2,817.50 4.57%01.1500% MAT 11/24/26 FIXEDRATE CD /VA CD
Total 2026 26,140,000 0.93% 06/09/2026 $242,575.00

1.05%

4.83%4.83%

3.29 $26,085,951.3
$-2,875,486.40
$23,210,464.95
$72,928.62

24.32%
Maturing 2027
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.561
15,640.00

1.84%

2.03% -188,780.00
01/26/2027 3.82 1,811,220.00 1.90%

4.39%
36,800.00 4.39%

NR/NR/NR
FFCB BOND 01.840 % DUE 012627 Aaa/AAA/AA+DTD 012622 FC 07262022 2,000,000 2,000,000.00 90.098
13,745.56

1.78%

1.98% -198,040.00
02/10/2027 02/10/2023 3.86 1,801,960.00 1.89%

4.44%4.44%
100.00
35,600.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB BOND 01.780 % DUE 021027 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 021022 FC 08102022 245,000 245,000.00 89.213
319.51

1.70%

1.91% -26,428.15
02/18/2027 3.97 218,571.85 0.23%

4.56%
METRO CREDIT UNION MA US RT 4,165.00 4.56%01.7000% MAT 02/18/27 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE /MA CD
245,000 245,000.00 89.213
125.52

1.70%

1.91% -26,428.15
02/18/2027 3.97 218,571.85 0.23%

4.56%
PENTAGON FED CREDI VA US RT 4,165.00 4.56%01.7000% MAT 02/18/27 CREDITUNION SHARE CERT /VA CD
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 26 of 31 Item #10. Page 29
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1658
Consolidated report prepared for City of Glendora
Bond holdings - as of December 29, 2022 (continued)Maturing 2027 Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon
Effective
maturity
Call date/
Call price ($)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Curr. yield (%)
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Modified
duration
Market
price ($)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
% of
bond
port.

Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
3,215,000 3,075,098.40 90.801
22,258.52

2.01%

2.21% -155,846.25
02/25/2027 02/25/2023 3.88 2,919,252.15 3.06%

4.46%4.46%
100.00
64,621.50

NR/NR/NR
FHLB BOND 02.010 % DUE 022527 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 022522 FC 08252022 245,000 245,927.67 90.346
1,584.11

2.00%

2.21% -24,579.97
03/02/2027 3.90 221,347.70 0.23%

4.57%
EAGLEMARK SVGS BK NV US RT 4,900.00 4.57%02.0000% MAT 03/02/27 FIXEDRATE CD /NV CD
490,000 0.00 99.963
964.35

5.45%

5.45% 489,817.72
03/16/2027 03/16/2023 3.66 489,817.72 0.51%

5.46%5.46%
100.00
26,705.00

NR/NR/NR
FHLB BOND 05.450 % DUE 031627 Aaa/NR/AA+DTD 121622 FC 03162023 245,000 245,000.00 94.602
751.78

3.20%

3.38% -13,225.10
05/24/2027 4.03 231,774.90 0.24%

4.57%
DISCOVER BANK DE US RT 7,840.00 4.57%03.2000% MAT 05/24/27 FIXEDRATE CD /DE CD
245,000 245,000.00 94.695
305.41

3.25%

3.43% -12,997.25
06/15/2027 4.13 232,002.75 0.24%

4.57%
LAFAYETTE FED CRED MD US RT 7,962.50 4.57%03.2500% MAT 06/15/27 LICUSHARE CERTIFICATE /MD CD
Total 2027 8,930,000 2.18% 02/22/2027 $192,759.00

2.37%

4.52%4.52%

3.87 $8,301,026.07
$-156,507.15
$8,144,518.92
$55,694.75

8.54%
Effective rating/
Underlying rating
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Mkt. value ($)/
Accr. interest ($)
Adjusted
cost basis ($)/
Unreal. g/l ($)
Call date/
Coupon Call price ($)
Modified
duration
YTM (%)/
YTW (%)
Est. annual
income ($)/
Quantity Curr. yield (%)
Effective
maturity
% of
bond
port.

Market
price ($)

4.65%4.65%
07/28/2025 NA 2.39 $103,142,068. NA $95,421,813.53
$-7,720,255.17
103,584,00

1.50% $335,959.81

1.41% $1,434,175.75 100%
Total Bond Portfolio
$95,757,773.34
Includes all fixed-rate securities in the selected portfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass-Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 27 of 31 Item #10. Page 30
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1659
Important information about this report
Disclosures applicable to accounts at UBS Financial Services Inc.This section contains important disclosures regarding theinformation and valuations presented here. Allinformation presented is subject to change at any timeand is provided only as of the date indicated. Theinformation in this report is for informational purposesonly and should not be relied upon as the basis of aninvestment or liquidation decision. UBS FS accountstatements and official tax documents are the onlyofficial record of your accounts and are not replaced,amended or superseded by any of the informationpresented in these reports. You should not rely on thisinformation in making purchase or sell decisions, for taxpurposes or otherwise.UBS FS offers a number of investment advisory programsto clients, acting in our capacity as an investmentadviser, including fee-based financial planning,discretionary account management, non-discretionaryinvestment advisory programs, and advice on theselection of investment managers and mutual fundsoffered through our investment advisory programs.When we act as your investment adviser, we will have awritten agreement with you expressly acknowledgingour investment advisory relationship with you anddescribing our obligations to you. At the beginning ofour advisory relationship, we will give you our Form ADVbrochure(s) for the program(s) you selected that providesdetailed information about, among other things, theadvisory services we provide, our fees, our personnel,our other business activities and financial industryaffiliations and conflicts between our interests and yourinterests.In our attempt to provide you with the highest qualityinformation available, we have compiled this reportusing data obtained from recognized statistical sourcesand authorities in the financial industry. While webelieve this information to be reliable, we cannot makeany representations regarding its accuracy orcompleteness. Please keep this guide as your AdvisoryReview.Please keep in mind that most investment objectives arelong term. Although it is important to evaluate yourportfolio's performance over multiple time periods, webelieve the greatest emphasis should be placed on thelonger period returns.Please review the report content carefully and contactyour Financial Advisor with any questions.Client Accounts: This report may include all assets inthe accounts listed and may include eligible andineligible assets in a fee-based program. Since ineligibleassets are not considered fee-based program assets, theinclusion of such securities will distort the actualperformance of your accounts and does not reflect theperformance of your accounts in the fee-based program.As a result, the performance reflected in this report can vary substantially from the individual accountperformance reflected in the performance reportsprovided to you as part of those programs. For feebased programs, fees are charged on the market valueof eligible assets in the accounts and assessed quarterlyin advance, prorated according to the number ofcalendar days in the billing period. When shown on areport, the risk profile and return objectives describeyour overall goals for these accounts. For each accountyou maintain, you choose one return objective and aprimary risk profile. If you have questions regardingthese objectives or wish to change them, please contactyour Financial Advisor to update your account records.Performance: This report presents account activity andperformance depending on which inception type you'vechosen. The two options are: (1) All Assets (SincePerformance Start): This presents performance for allassets since the earliest possible date; (2) Advisory Assets(Advisory Strategy Start) for individual advisory accounts:This presents Advisory level performance since the LatestStrategy Start date; If an account that has never beenmanaged is included in the consolidated report, the totalperformance of that unmanaged account will beincluded since inception.Time-weighted Returns for accounts / SWP/AAPsleeves (Monthly periods): The report displays a timeweighted rate of return (TWR) that is calculated usingthe Modified Dietz Method. This calculation uses thebeginning and ending portfolio values for the monthand weighs each contribution/withdrawal based uponthe day the cash flow occurred. Periods greater than onemonth are calculated by linking the monthly returns. TheTWR gives equal weighting to every return regardless ofamount of money invested, so it is an effective measurefor returns on a fee based account. All periods shownwhich are greater than 12 months are annualized. Thisapplies to all performance for all assets before09/30/2010, Advisory assets before 12/31/2010 andSWP sleeves before 04/30/2018.Time-weighted Returns for accounts / SWP/AAPsleeves (Daily periods): The report displays a timeweighted rate of return (TWR) that is calculated bydividing the portfolio's daily gain/loss by the previousday's closing market value plus the net value of cashflows that occurred during the day, if it was positive. TheTWR gives equal weighting to every return regardless ofamount of money invested, so it is an effective measurefor returns on a fee based account. Periods greater thanone day are calculated by linking the daily returns. Allperiods shown which are greater than 12 months areannualized. For reports generated prior to 01/26/2018,the performance calculations used the account's end ofday value on the performance inception (listed in thereport under the column "ITD") and all cash flows wereposted at end of day. As a result of the change, theoverall rate of return (TWR) and beginning market valuedisplayed can vary from prior generated reports. This applies to all performance for all assets on or after09/30/2010, Advisory assets on or after 12/31/2010,SWP/AAP sleeves on or after 04/30/2018 as well as allAsset Class and Security level returns.Money-weighted returns: Money-weighted return(MWR) is a measure of the rate of return for an asset orportfolio of assets. It is calculated by finding the dailyInternal Rate of Return (IRR) for the period and thencompounding this return by the number of days in theperiod being measured. The MWR incorporates the sizeand timing of cash flows, so it is an effective measure ofreturns on a portfolio.Annualized Performance: All performance periodsgreater than one year are calculated (unless otherwisestated) on an annualized basis, which represents thereturn on an investment multiplied or divided to give acomparable one year return.Cumulative Performance: A cumulative return is theaggregate amount that an investment has gained or lostover time, independent of the period of time involved.Net of Fees and Gross of Fees Performance:Performance is presented on a "net of fees" and "grossof fees" basis, where indicated. Net returns do notreflect Program and wrap fees prior to 10/31/10 foraccounts that are billed separately via invoice through aseparate account billing arrangement. Gross returns donot reflect the deduction of fees, commissions or othercharges. The payment of actual fees and expenses willreduce a client's return. The compound effect of suchfees and expenses should be considered when reviewingreturns. For example, the net effect of the deduction offees on annualized performance, including thecompounded effect over time, is determined by therelative size of the fee and the account's investmentperformance. It should also be noted that where grossreturns are compared to an index, the indexperformance also does not reflect any transaction costs,which would lower the performance results. Marketindex data maybe subject to review and revision.Benchmark/Major Indices: The past performance of anindex is not a guarantee of future results. Anybenchmark is shown for informational purposes onlyand relates to historical performance of market indicesand not the performance of actual investments.Although most portfolios use indices as benchmarks,portfolios are actively managed and generally are notrestricted to investing only in securities in the index. As aresult, your portfolio holdings and performance may varysubstantially from the index. Each index reflects anunmanaged universe of securities without any deductionfor advisory fees or other expenses that would reduceactual returns, as well as the reinvestment of all incomeand dividends. An actual investment in the securitiesincluded in the index would require an investor to incurtransaction costs, which would lower the performance results. Indices are not actively managed and investorscannot invest directly in the indices. Market index datamaybe subject to review and revision. Further, there isno guarantee that an investor's account will meet orexceed the stated benchmark. Index performanceinformation has been obtained from third partiesdeemed to be reliable. We have not independentlyverified this information, nor do we make anyrepresentations or warranties to the accuracy orcompleteness of this information.Blended Index - For Advisory accounts, Blended Index isdesigned to reflect the asset categories in which youraccount is invested. For Brokerage accounts, you havethe option to select any benchmark from the list.For certain products, the blended index represents theinvestment style corresponding to your client targetallocation. If you change your client target allocation,your blended index will change in step with your changeto your client target allocation.Blended Index 2 - 8 - are optional indices selected by youwhich may consist of a blend of indexes. For advisoryaccounts, these indices are for informational purposesonly. Depending on the selection, the benchmarkselected may not be an appropriate basis for comparisonof your portfolio based on it's holdings.For strategies that are highly customized, such asConcentrated Equity Solutions (CES), benchmarks arebroad market indices included for general reference andare not intended to show comparative marketperformance or potential portfolios with risk or returnprofiles similar to your account. Benchmark indices areshown for illustrative purposes only.Custom Time Periods: If represented on this report, theperformance start date and the performance end datehave been selected by your Financial Advisor in order toprovide performance and account activity informationfor your account for the specified period of time only. Asa result, only a portion of your account's activity andperformance information is presented in theperformance report, and, therefore, presents a distortedrepresentation of your account's activity andperformance.Net Deposits/Withdrawals: When shown on a report,this information represents the net value of all cash andsecurities contributions and withdrawals, program fees(including wrap fees) and other fees added to orsubtracted from your accounts from the first day to thelast day of the period. When fees are shown separately,net deposits / withdrawals does not include programfees (including wrap fees). When investment return isdisplayed net deposits / withdrawals does not includeprogram fees (including wrap fees). For securitycontributions and withdrawals, securities are calculatedusing the end of day UBS FS price on the day securities Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 28 of 31
Item #10. Page 31
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1660
Disclosures applicable to accounts at UBS Financial Services Inc. (continued) are delivered in or out of the accounts. Wrap fees will beincluded in this calculation except when paid via aninvoice or through a separate accounts billingarrangement. When shown on Client summary and/orPortfolio review report, program fees (including wrapfees) may not be included in net deposits/withdrawals.PACE Program fees paid from sources other than yourPACE account are treated as a contribution. A PACEProgram Fee rebate that is not reinvested is treated as awithdrawal.Deposits: When shown on a report, this informationrepresents the net value of all cash and securitiescontributions added to your accounts from the first dayto the last day of the period. On Client Summary Reportand/or Portfolio Review Report, this may exclude theOpening balance. For security contributions, securitiesare calculated using the end of day UBS FS price on theday securities are delivered in or out of the accounts.Withdrawals: When shown on a report, thisinformation represents the net value of all cash andsecurities withdrawals subtracted from your accountsfrom the first day to the last day of the period. On Clientsummary and/or portfolio review report Withdrawalsmay not include program fees (including wrap fees). Forsecurity withdrawals, securities are calculated using theend of day UBS FS price on the day securities aredelivered in or out of the accounts.Dividends/Interest: Dividend and interest earned,when shown on a report, does not reflect your account'stax status or reporting requirements. Use only official taxreporting documents (i.e. 1099) for tax reportingpurposes. The classification of private investmentdistributions can only be determined by referring to theofficial year-end tax-reporting document provided by theissuer.Change in Accrued Interest: When shown on a report,this information represents the difference between theaccrued interest at the beginning of the period from theaccrued interest at the end of the period.Change in Value: Represents the change in value of theportfolio during the reporting period, excludingadditions/withdrawals, dividend and interest incomeearned and accrued interest. Change in Value mayinclude programs fees (including wrap fees) and otherfees.Fees: Fees represented in this report include programand wrap fees. Program and wrap fees prior to October1, 2010 for accounts that are billed separately via invoicethrough a separate account billing arrangement are notincluded in this report.Performance Start Date Changes: The PerformanceStart Date for accounts marked with a '^' have changed.Performance figures of an account with a changed Performance Start Date may not include the entirehistory of the account. The new Performance Start Datewill generate performance returns and activityinformation for a shorter period than is available at UBSFS. As a result, the overall performance of theseaccounts may generate better performance than theperiod of time that would be included if the report usedthe inception date of the account. UBS FS recommendsreviewing performance reports that use the inceptiondate of the account because reports with longer timeframes are usually more helpful when evaluatinginvestment programs and strategies. Performancereports may include accounts with inception dates thatprecede the new Performance Start Date and will showperformance and activity information from the earliestavailable inception date.The change in Performance Start Date may be the resultof a performance gap due to a zero-balance thatprevents the calculation of continuous returns from theinception of the account. The Performance Start Datemay also change if an account has failed one of ourperformance data integrity tests. In such instances, theaccount will be labeled as 'Review Required' andperformance prior to that failure will be restricted.Finally, the Performance Start Date will change if youhave explicitly requested a performance restart. Pleasecontact your Financial Advisor for additional detailsregarding your new Performance Start Date.Closed Account Performance: Accounts that havebeen closed may be included in the consolidatedperformance report. When closed accounts are includedin the consolidated report, the performance report willonly include information for the time period the accountwas active during the consolidated performancereporting time period.Important information on options-based strategies:Options involve risk and are not suitable for everyone.Prior to buying or selling an option investors must read acopy of the Characteristics & Risks of StandardizedOptions, also known as the options disclosure document(ODD). It explains the characteristics and risks ofexchange traded options. The options risk disclosuredocument can be accessed at the following webaddress: www.optionsclearing.com/about/publications/character-risks.Concentrated Equity Solutions (CES) managers are notinvolved in the selection of the underlying stockpositions. The Manager will advise only on the optionsselection in order to pursue the strategy in connectionwith the underlying stock position(s) deposited in theaccount. It is important to keep this in mind whenevaluating the manager's performance since theaccount's performance will include the performance ofthe underlying equity position that is not beingmanaged. CES use options to seek to achieve yourinvestment objectives regarding your concentrationstock position. Options strategies change the potential return profile of your stock. In certain scenarios, such ascall writing, the call position will limit your ability toparticipate in any potential increase in the underlyingequity position upon which the call was written.Therefore, in some market conditions, particularly duringperiods of significant appreciation of the underlyingequity position(s), the CES account will decrease theperformance that would have been achieved had thestock been held long without implementing the CESstrategy.Portfolio: For purposes of this report "portfolio" isdefined as all of the accounts presented on the coverpage or the header of this report and does notnecessarily include all of the client's accounts held atUBS FS or elsewhere.Percentage: Portfolio (in the "% Portfolio / Total"column) includes all holdings held in the account(s)selected when this report was generated. Broad assetclass (in the "% broad asset class" column) includes allholdings held in that broad asset class in the account(s)selected when this report was generated.Tax lots: This report displays security tax lots as eitherone line item (i.e., lumped tax lots) or as separate tax lotlevel information. If you choose to display security taxlots as one line item, the total cost equals the total valueof all tax lots. The unit cost is an average of the totalcost divided by the total number of shares. If the shareswere purchased in different lots, the unit price listeddoes not represent the actual cost paid for each lot. Theunrealized gain/loss value is calculated by combining thetotal value of all tax lots plus or minus the total marketvalue of the security.If you choose to display tax lot level information asseparate line items on the Portfolio Holdings report, thetax lot information may include information fromsources other than UBS FS. The Firm does notindependently verify or guarantee the accuracy orvalidity of any information provided by sources otherthan UBS FS. As a result this information may not beaccurate and is provided for informational purposesonly. Clients should not rely on this information inmaking purchase or sell decisions, for tax purposes orotherwise. See your monthly statement for additionalinformation.Pricing: All securities are priced using the closing pricereported on the last business day preceding the date ofthis report. Every reasonable attempt has been made toaccurately price securities; however, we make nowarranty with respect to any security's price. Please referto the back of the first page of your UBS FS accountstatement for important information regarding thepricing used for certain types of securities, the sources ofpricing data and other qualifications concerning thepricing of securities. To determine the value of securitiesin your account, we generally rely on third party quotation services. If a price is unavailable or believed tobe unreliable, we may determine the price in good faithand may use other sources such as the last recordedtransaction. When securities are held at anothercustodian or if you hold illiquid or restricted securities forwhich there is no published price, we will generally relyon the value provided by the custodian or issuer of thatsecurity.Cash: Cash on deposit at UBS Bank USA is protected bythe Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to$250,000 in principal and accrued interest per depositorfor each ownership type. Deposits made in anindividual's own name, joint name, or individualretirement account are each held in a separate type ofownership. Such deposits are not guaranteed by UBS FS.More information is available upon request.Margin: The quantity value may indicate that all or partof this position is held on margin or held in the shortaccount. When an account holds a debit balance, thisdebit balance is incorporated into the account's totalmarket value and deducted from the total value. Whencalculating the percent of portfolio on each security, thepercentage will be impacted by the total market value ofthe account. Therefore, if the account's market value isreduced by a debit value of a holding the percent ofportfolio will be greater and if the account's marketvalue is increased by a holding then the percent ofportfolio will be less.Asset Allocation: Your allocation analysis is based onyour current portfolio. The Asset Allocation portion ofthis report shows the mix of various investment classesin your account. An asset allocation that shows asignificantly higher percentage of equity investmentsmay be more appropriate for an investor with a moreaggressive investment strategy and higher tolerance forrisk. Similarly, the asset allocation of a more conservativeinvestor may show a higher percentage of fixed incomeinvestments.Separately Managed Accounts and PooledInvestment Vehicles (such as mutual funds, closed endfunds and exchanged traded funds): The assetclassification displayed is based on firm's proprietarymethodology for classifying assets. Please note that theasset classification assigned to rolled up strategies mayinclude individual investments that provide exposure toother asset classes. For example, an InternationalDeveloped Markets strategy may include exposure toEmerging Markets, and a US Large Cap strategy mayinclude exposure to Mid Cap and Small Cap, etc.Mutual Fund Asset Allocation: If the option tounbundle balanced mutual funds is selected and if afund's holdings data is available, mutual funds will beclassified by the asset class, subclass, and stylebreakdown of their underlying holdings. Where amutual fund or ETF contains equity holdings from Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 29 of 31
Item #10. Page 32
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1661
Disclosures applicable to accounts at UBS Financial Services Inc. (continued) multiple equity sectors, this report will proportionatelyallocate the underlying holdings of the fund to thosesectors measured as a percentage of the total fund'sasset value as of the date shown.This information is supplied by Morningstar, Inc. on adaily basis to UBS FS based on data supplied by the fundwhich may not be current. Mutual funds change theirportfolio holdings on a regular (often daily) basis.Accordingly, any analysis that includes mutual funds maynot accurately reflect the current composition of thesefunds. If a fund's underlying holding data is notavailable, it will be classified based on its correspondingoverall Morningstar classification. All data is as of thedate indicated in the report.All pooled investment vehicles (such as mutual funds,closed end mutual funds, and exchange traded funds)incorporate internal management and operationexpenses, which are reflected in the performancereturns. Please see relevant fund prospectus for moreinformation. Please note, performance for mutual fundsis inclusive of multiple share classes.Ineligible Assets: We require that you hold andpurchase only eligible managed assets in your advisoryaccounts. Please contact your Financial Advisor for a listof the eligible assets in your program. These reports mayprovide performance information for eligible andineligible assets in a fee-based program. Since ineligibleassets are not considered fee-based program assets, theinclusion of such securities will distort the actualperformance of your advisory assets. As a result, theperformance reflected in this report can varysubstantially from the individual account performancereflected in the performance reports provided to you aspart of those programs. For fee-based programs, feesare charged on the market value of eligible assets in theaccounts and assessed quarterly in advance, proratedaccording to the number of calendar days in the billingperiod. Neither UBS nor your Financial Advisor will act asyour investment adviser with respect to Ineligible Assets.Variable Annuity Asset Allocation: If the option tounbundle a variable annuity is selected and if a variableannuity's holdings data is available, variable annuitieswill be classified by the asset class, subclass, and stylebreakdown for their underlying holdings. Where avariable annuity contains equity holdings from multipleequity sectors, this report will proportionately allocatethe underlying holdings of the variable annuity to thosesectors measured as a percentage of the total variableannuity's asset value as of the date shown.This information is supplied by Morningstar, Inc. on aweekly basis to UBS FS based on data supplied by thevariable annuity which may not be current. Portfolioholdings of variable annuities change on a regular (oftendaily) basis. Accordingly, any analysis that includesvariable annuities may not accurately reflect the current composition of these variable annuities. If a variableannuity's underlying holding data is not available, it willremain classified as an annuity. All data is as of the dateindicated in the report.Equity Style: The Growth, Value and Core labels aredetermined by Morningstar. If an Equity Style isunclassified, it is due to non-availability of data requiredby Morningstar to assign it a particular style.Equity Capitalization: Market Capitalization isdetermined by Morningstar. Equity securities areclassified as Large Cap, Mid Cap or Small Cap byMorningstar. Unclassified securities are those for whichno capitalization is available on Morningstar.Equity Sectors: The Equity sector analysis may include avariety of accounts, each with different investment andrisk parameters. As a result, the overweighting orunderweighting in a particular sector or asset classshould not be viewed as an isolated factor in makinginvestment/liquidation decisions; but should be assessedon an account by account basis to determine the overallimpact on the account's portfolio.Classified Equity: Classified equities are defined asthose equities for which the firm can confirm the specificindustry and sector of the underlying equity instrument.Estimated Annual Income: The Estimated AnnualIncome is the annualized yearly per shareDividends/interest paid and multiplied by the quantity ofshares held in the selected account(s). For savingsproduct & sweep funds this value is not calculated and isdisplayed as 0.Current Yield: Current yield is defined as the estimatedannual income divided by the total market value.Bond Rating: These ratings are obtained fromindependent industry sources and are not verified byUBS FS. Securities without rating information are leftblank. Rating agencies may discontinue ratings on highyield securities.NR: When NR is displayed under bond rating column, noratings are currently available from that rating agency.High Yield: This report may designate a security as ahigh yield fixed income security even though one ormore rating agencies rate the security as an investmentgrade security. Further, this report may incorporate arating that is no longer current with the rating agency.For more information about the rating for any high yieldfixed income security, or to consider whether to hold orsell a high yield fixed income security, please contactyour financial advisor or representative and do not makeany investment decision based on this report.Credit/Event Risk: Investments are subject to event risk and changes in credit quality of the issuer. Issuers canexperience economic situations that may have adverseeffects on the market value of their securities.Interest Rate Risk: Bonds are subject to market valuefluctuations as interest rates rise and fall. If sold prior tomaturity, the price received for an issue may be less thanthe original purchase price.Reinvestment Risk: Since most corporate issues payinterest semiannually, the coupon payments over the lifeof the bond can have a major impact on the bond's totalreturn.Call Provisions: When evaluating the purchase of acorporate bond, one should be aware of any featuresthat may allow the issuer to call the security. This isparticularly important when considering an issue that istrading at a premium to its call price, since the returnmay be negatively impacted if the issue is redeemed.Should an issue be called, investors may be faced withan earlier than anticipated reinvestment decision, andmay be unable to reinvest their principal at equallyfavorable rates.Effective Maturity: Effective maturity is the expectedredemption due to pre-refunding, puts, or maturity anddoes not reflect any sinking fund activity, optional orextraordinary calls. Securities without a maturity date areleft blank and typically include Preferred Securities,Mutual Funds and Fixed Income UITs.Yields: Yield to Maturity and Yield to Worst arecalculated to the worst call.Accrued Interest: Interest that has accumulatedbetween the most recent payment and the report datemay be reflected in market values for interest bearingsecurities.Bond Averages: All averages are weighted averagescalculated based on market value of the holding, notincluding accrued interest.Tax Status: "Taxable" includes all securities held in ataxable account that are subject to federal and/or stateor local taxation. "Tax-exempt" includes all securitiesheld in a taxable account that are exempt from federal,state and local taxation. "Tax-deferred" includes allsecurities held in a tax-deferred account, regardless ofthe status of the security.Bond sensitivity analysis: This analysis uses ModifiedDuration which approximates the percentage pricechange of a security for a given change in yield. Thehigher the modified duration of a security, the higher itsrisk.  For callable securities, modified duration does notaddress the impact of changing interest rates on abond's expected cash flow as a result of a call orprepayment.

Amortization and Accretion: Prior to March 2008,amortization was calculated using the straight linemethod for tax exempt securities and was not calculatedfor taxable securities. Post March 2008, amortization iscalculated using the constant yield method. Prior toOctober 2008, accretion due to original issue discountwas not calculated. Post October 2008, accretion due tooriginal issue discount is calculated using the constantyield method.  Prior to January 2015, accretion due tomarket discount was calculated using the straight linemethod. Post January 2015, accretion due to marketdiscount is calculated using the constant yield method. We assume the securities are held to par andpremiums are calculated to call date. Amortization andaccretion values may be incorrect due to adjustmentsrelated to cost basis. You may hold additional fixedincome securities that may not appear on this report.Please refer to your account statements for informationregarding all of your holdings.Gain/Loss: The gain/loss information may includecalculations based upon non-UBS FS cost basisinformation. The Firm does not independently verify orguarantee the accuracy or validity of any informationprovided by sources other than UBS FS. In addition, ifthis report contains positions with unavailable cost basis,the gain/(loss) for these positions are excluded in thecalculation for the Gain/(Loss). As a result these figuresmay not be accurate and are provided for informationalpurposes only. Clients should not rely on thisinformation in making purchase or sell decisions, for taxpurposes or otherwise. Rely only on year-end tax formswhen preparing your tax return. See your monthlystatement for additional information.Accounts Included in this Report: The account listingmay or may not include all of your accounts with UBSFS. The accounts included in this report are listed underthe "Accounts included in this review" shown on thefirst page or listed at the top of each page. If an accountnumber begins with "@" this denotes assets or liabilitiesheld at other financial institutions. Information aboutthese assets, including valuation, account type and costbasis, is based on the information you provided to us, orprovided to us by third party data aggregators orcustodians at your direction. We have not verified, andare not responsible for, the accuracy or completeness ofthis information.Account name(s) displayed in this report and labels usedfor groupings of accounts can be customizable"nicknames" chosen by you to assist you with yourrecordkeeping or may have been included by yourfinancial advisor for reference purposes only. The namesused have no legal effect, are not intended to reflect anystrategy, product, recommendation, investmentobjective or risk profile associated with your accounts orany group of accounts, and are not a promise or Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 30 of 31
Item #10. Page 33
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1662
Disclosures applicable to accounts at UBS Financial Services Inc. (continued) guarantee that wealth, or any financial results, can orwill be achieved. All investments involve the risk of loss,including the risk of loss of the entire investment.For more information about account or group names, orto make changes, contact your Financial Advisor.Account changes: At UBS, we are committed tohelping you work toward your financial goals. So thatwe may continue providing you with financial advicethat is consistent with your investment objectives, pleaseconsider the following two questions:1) Have there been any changes to your financialsituation or investment objectives?2) Would you like to implement or modify anyrestrictions regarding the management of your account?If the answer to either question is "yes," it is importantthat you contact your Financial Advisor as soon aspossible to discuss these changes. For MAC advisoryaccounts, please contact your investment managerdirectly if you would like to impose or change anyinvestment restrictions on your account.ADV disclosure: A complimentary copy of our currentForm ADV Disclosure Brochure that describes theadvisory program and related fees is available throughyour Financial Advisor. Please contact your FinancialAdvisor if you have any questions.Important information for former Piper Jaffray andMcDonald Investments clients: As an accommodationto former Piper Jaffray and McDonald Investmentsclients, these reports include performance history fortheir Piper Jaffray accounts prior to August 12, 2006 andMcDonald Investments accounts prior to February 9,2007, the date the respective accounts were convertedto UBS FS. UBS FS has not independently verified thisinformation nor do we make any representations orwarranties as to the accuracy or completeness of thatinformation and will not be liable to you if any suchinformation is unavailable, delayed or inaccurate.For insurance, annuities, and 529 Plans, UBS FS relies oninformation obtained from third party services it believesto be reliable. UBS FS does not independently verify orguarantee the accuracy or validity of any informationprovided by third parties. Information for insurance,annuities, and 529 Plans that has been provided by athird party service may not reflect the quantity andmarket value as of the previous business day. Whenavailable, an "as of" date is included in the description.Investors outside the U.S. are subject to securities andtax regulations within their applicable jurisdiction thatare not addressed in this report. Nothing in this reportshall be construed to be a solicitation to buy or offer tosell any security, product or service to any non-U.S.investor, nor shall any such security, product or servicebe solicited, offered or sold in any jurisdiction wheresuch activity would be contrary to the securities laws or other local laws and regulations or would subject UBS toany registration requirement within such jurisdiction.Performance History prior to the account's inception atUBS Financial Services, Inc. may have been included inthis report and is based on data provided by third partysources. UBS Financial Services Inc. has notindependently verified this information nor does UBSFinancial Services Inc. guarantee the accuracy or validityof the information.Important information about brokerage andadvisory services. As a firm providing wealthmanagement services to clients, UBS Financial ServicesInc. offers investment advisory services in its capacity asan SEC-registered investment adviser and brokerageservices in its capacity as an SEC-registered brokerdealer. Investment advisory services and brokerageservices are separate and distinct, differ in material waysand are governed by different laws and separatearrangements. It is important that clients understand theways in which we conduct business, that they carefullyread the agreements and disclosures that we provide tothem about the products or services we offer. For moreinformation, please review client relationship summaryprovided at ubs.com/relationshipsummary. UBS FS All Rights Reserved. Member SIPC.Non-UBS Assets and Liabilities: This report is notintended to provide you with consolidated informationor reporting regarding your holdings at other firms.However, at your request, this report may includeinformation regarding assets that you hold at otherfinancial institutions so that you may review your assetallocation and/or investment strategy in the context ofyour overall holdings. You should review and maintainthe original documents for these assets, such as thestatements for individual accounts held away from UBS.Those documents may contain notices, disclosures andother information important to you, and may also serveas a reference should questions arise regarding theaccuracy of that information as presented in this report.The information presented for accounts held at otherfinancial institutions has been provided to UBS at yourdirection through your agreement with an Outside AssetData Aggregation Service. These accounts have beenadded to this report at your request and areautomatically updated to reflect the most recent datareceived from the custodian. Information may have alsobeen provided based on documents and valuation youprovided to your Financial Advisor. These accounts havebeen added to this report at your request and may notreflect the current valuation.If an account number begins with "@" this denotesassets or liabilities held at other financial institutions.Information about these assets, including valuation, account type and cost basis, is based on the informationyou provided to us, or provided to us by third party dataaggregators or custodians at your direction. We havenot verified, and are not responsible for, the accuracy orcompleteness of this information.If the information you or your custodians provided to usis not current, inclusion of these assets will impact theaccuracy of the current asset allocation and otheranalysis presented. We do not provide purchase, sale orhold recommendations or advice with respect to yourassets at other firms and do not assume responsibility foractivity you conduct at other financial institutions.UBS’s SIPC coverage applies to assets held at UBS. If youmaintain assets at other firms that may be SIPCmembers, you should contact their financialrepresentative or the other entity or refer to the otherentitys statement regarding SIPC membership. YourUBS Financial Services Inc. account statements are theonly official record of your UBS holdings and accountand are not replaced, amended or superseded by any ofthe information presented in this report.Assets that you hold at other financial institutions arepriced using the closing price reported on the lastbusiness day preceding the date of this report. Everyreasonable attempt has been made to accurately pricesecurities; however, we make no warranty with respectto any security’s price. To determine the value ofsecurities in your account, we generally rely on thirdparty quotation services. If a price is unavailable orbelieved to be unreliable, we may determine the price ingood faith and may use other sources such as the lastrecorded transaction. When securities are held atanother custodian or if you hold illiquid or restrictedsecurities for which there is no published price, we willgenerally rely on the value provided by the custodian orissuer of that security.The value of assets held at other financial institutions isbased on the "Last Refresh Date" displayed. Up todate valuation and information can be obtained directlyfrom the custodian of your assets. The accountstatements you receive from your third party custodianregarding the assets you hold with them are the officialrecord of your holdings and accounts and are notimpacted or superseded by the information in thisreport.Account balances and security pricing will always displayin U.S. Dollars even if assets in your Outside Accountsare denominated in other currencies. UBS will convertany values received in the Outside Account Informationto U.S. Dollars using foreign exchange rates from UBS asof the previous business.

Report created on: December 30, 2022 Page 31 of 31
Item #10. Page 34
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1663

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS DATE: JANUARY 23, 2023
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DISTRICT(S): CITYWIDE
SUBJECT: AWARD A CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT TO MDJ MANAGEMENT FOR THE

PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF EXTERIOR LED LIGHTING PROJECT AT THE WATER YARD IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $119,176 (STRATEGIC PLAN ITEM 46 - IMCIF)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Award a Contract Services Agreement with MDJ Management for the Purchase and Installation of exterior LED lighting at the Glendora Water Yard in the amount of $108,341.10 with a 10% contingency in the amount of $10,834.11 for a total contract amount not to exceed $119,176;

2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement with MDJ Management including minimal and/or non-substantive changes;

3. Approve an additional appropriation to this project from the Water CIP Fund 530 in the amount of $14,176; and

4. Authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff obtained a proposal through Gordian to provide exterior LED lighting for the Water Division facility.

Due to safety and security concerns the Water Division facilities management would like to urgently move forward with the proposed work. Bid amount total to complete the project is $108,341.00.

MDJ Management currently holds a competitively bid indefinite-quantity construction (IQC) agreement for the CA- Region 8 – General Building with Sourcewell. Sourcewell contracts with Gordian to administer and facilitate the use of these types of agreements under what Sourcewell terms their ezIQC® program.

The City pays no fees to and does not contract directly with Gordian as part of these liaison services. As a participating agency of Sourcewell cooperative purchasing organization, the City of Glendora can utilize Sourcewell agreements under applicable State and Local Regulations.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Per Glendora Municipal Code (GMC) Section 2.40.050(4), “Purchases made at contract prices awarded by federal or state governments or by any political subdivision thereof or pursuant to a cooperative purchasing agreement” are exempt from GMC Sections 2.40.070 and 2.40.080 regarding informal purchasing and formal contract procedures, respectively.

DISCUSSION
The Water Division field crews are often called out due to emergency water related situations that requires staff to access facilities at various hours throughout the day and night. The water yard is the base of water operations and has extremely limited lighting, which makes access to heavy mechanized equipment and machinery difficult at late hours of the night or early mornings. Inadequate illumination of the water yard Item #11. Page 1
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1664
Staff Report Page 2 of 2
can pose various safety hazards for employees. Adding additional energy efficient lighting throughout the yard would address the current safety hazards as wells aid in avoiding theft or vandalism.

MDI’s proposal includes the installation of 68 new LED fixtures, and the addition of 2 new pole lights.

Energy efficient LED flood lighting will be located throughout the property to illuminate the entrance, parking lots, driveways, and all back working areas will be 100% lit during the evenings providing safety for staff. Management has ensured that all lighting fixtures will be tilted to protect neighboring residential properties from experiencing any extra unwanted light. If any issues do arise, staff with work with those residents to ensure those concerns are addressed quickly.

FISCAL IMPACT
The funding for this project was included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 adopted budget in the Water CIP Fund 530. Available funding for this project is $105,000, which is insufficient. A budget appropriation from Water CIP Fund 530 is required for this project.

Exterior Lighting Enhancement - Water Yard - CIP Fund Budget $105,000 Requested Contingency - 10% $10,834
Total Projected Expenditures $119,176
Requested Budget Appropriation $14,176

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act provisions pursuant to Section 15302(c).

Prepared By Ivy Gonzalez, Administrative Assistant
Concurs With Not Applicable
Reviewed By Chisom Obegolu, Assistant Public Works Director Certified to Availability of Funds Marie Ricci, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Approved By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CEQA Review Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS:

A. MDJ Management Contract
B. MDJ Management Proposal
C. Project Map Location
Item #11. Page 2
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1665

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between

CITY OF GLENDORA
and

MDJ MANAGEMENT
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 3
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1666
1 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF GLENDORA AND

MDJ MANAGEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________ by and between the CITY OF GLENDORA, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and MDJ MANAGEMENT, a California Corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. Pursuant to the City of Glendora’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 4
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1667
2 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.

1.4 California Labor Law.

If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws, including the following requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed under this Agreement.
(c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor. (d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records.
(e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 5
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1668
3 these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. (g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code.

Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one and one-half (1½) times the basic rate of pay. (h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.” Consultant’s Authorized Initials ___________________
Matthew McMillon, President
(i) Consultant’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.

1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 6
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1669
4 against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.6 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.7 Care of Work.

The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.9 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $50,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 7
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1670
5 1.10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed $119,175.10 (One-Hundred Nineteen Thousand, One Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars Ten Cents) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.4 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement.

The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C” and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 8
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1671
6 warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.5 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding (1) year from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 9
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1672
7 ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.

The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Matthew McMillion, President
David Pages, Owner
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance.

4.2 Status of Consultant.

Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.

4.3 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be the Assistant Public Works or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

4.4 Independent Consultant.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 10
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1673
8 servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City.

City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages.

Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. (a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. (b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
(c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 11
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1674
9 (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
(c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance.

Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. (d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager. (f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 12
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1675
10 (h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. (k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation. (o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City. (p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

5.3 Indemnification.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 13
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1676
11 To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.

Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 14
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1677
12 completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment.

Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. / / /

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 15
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1678
13 (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.

7.2 Disputes; Default.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default.

Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 16
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1679
14 to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 17
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1680
15 If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.

If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 18
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1681
16 color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Glendora, 116 E. Foothill Blvd., Glendora, California 91741-3380, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing.

Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

9.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 19
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1682
17 jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.

No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.

Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.

Consultant’s Authorized Initials ___________________
Matthew McMillon, President
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 20
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1683
18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

City of Glendora, a municipal corporation
Adam Raymond
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CERTIFY AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
William W. Wynder
City Attorney
Marie Ricci
Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer
ATTEST:

Kathleen R. Sessman
City Clerk/Communications Director
CONTRACTOR:

MDJ Management
Name: Matthew McMillon
Title: President
Email Address: [email protected]
Name: David Pages
Title: Owner
Email Address: [email protected]
Address: 531Main Street, #611
El Segundo, CA 90245
Two corporate officer signatures required when Contractor is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups:
1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer.

CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED UNLESS EXECUTED UTILIZING DOCUSIGN. IN ADDITION, THE

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Jan 4, 2023 | 3:09 PM PST
Jan 4, 2023 | 2:28 PM PST
Item #11. Page 21
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1684
01240.0001/535308.1 A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services:

A. Furnish and Installation of 68 new LED exterior fixtures. Addition of 2 new lights with new LED flood lights throughout the property located at 1051 E Sierra Madre Avenue to illuminate all areas used during night work. Fixtures will be tilted to protect from neighborhood complaints. All existing material will be recycled and removed from the property. Entrance, parking lots, driveways, and all back working areas will be 100% lit during the evenings.

II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City:

A. Furnish and replace/install 68 new LED exterior fixtures and the addition of (2) new pole lights with new LED flood lights throughout the property to illuminate all areas used during night work. Fixtures will be titled to protect from neighbor complaints. All existing material will be recycled and removed from the site.

Entrance, parking lots, driveways, and all back working areas will be 100% lit during the evenings. Equipment details will be submitted for approval prior to ordering for installation.

Not included: Any controls for the fixtures and any photocells or dimming controls.

III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:

A. Weekly Progress Report
B. Weekly Updated (2-week ahead) work schedule
IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services:

A. Express Energy Services., Inc for the exterior lighting installations DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 22
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1685
01240.0001/535308.1 B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
Added text is indicated in bold italics, deleted text is indicated in strikethrough. [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 23
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1686
01240.0001/535308.1 C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Contractor shall perform all work at the rates on the Bid Sheet submitted as part of Contractors Proposal, and listed below:

II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.9.

III. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

V. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 24
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1687
01240.0001/535308.1 C-2
EXHIBIT “C-1”
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 25
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1688
01240.0001/535308.1 C-3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 26
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1689
01240.0001/535308.1 C-4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 27
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1690
01240.0001/535308.1 D-1
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services timely in accordance with the following schedule:

Following the award of the contract, City’s Contract Office will issue a written notice to proceed with shall include a designation of the “days to perform” the scope of work in Exhibit “A”, the “deadline date” by which the scope of work must be completed, and identify such report(s) or other work product the Contractor shall deliver during the performance of the scope of work in Exhibit “A”.

Description Days to Perform Deadline Date
A. All Work 45 Working Days TBD
II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates.

A. TBD upon award of the project
III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7C5AF35F-7C12-4433-8088-6CDB1EBDF97E Item #11. Page 28
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1691
Work Order Signature Document
EZIQC Contract No.: CA-R8-GB13-123021-MDJ
Glendora Water Yard - Ext. Lighting Install
New Work Order
111889.00
Modify an Existing Work Order
Work Order Title:

Work Order Number.: Work Order Date:

X
12/08/2022
Contractor Name:

Contact:

Phone:

Contact:

Phone:

Matt McMillon
310-490-1521
Owner Name: City of Glendora
Chisom Obegolu
626-852-5222
MDJ Management
Work to be Performed
Work to be performed as per the Final Detailed Scope of Work Attached and as per the terms and conditions of Sourcewell EZIQC Contract No CA-R8-GB13-123021-MDJ.

Brief Work Order Description:

Liquidated Damages Will apply: Will not apply:

Estimated Completion Date:

Time of Performance Estimated Start Date:

X
Work Order Firm Fixed Price: $108,341.10
Owner Purchase Order Number:

Approvals
City of Glendora Date MDJ Management Date

2.00