Agenda packet — Glendora City Council, January 24, 2023 (part 1 of 7)

SPECIAL NOTICE

IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY MESSAGE REGARDING

PARTICIPATION AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES RELATING TO PUBLIC MEETINGS All Brown Act meetings are subject to COVID-19 infection protocols. As of April 1, 2022, the City Council has determined that meetings will be considered in-person public “Brown Act” meetings for City of Glendora City Council, Board(s) and Commission(s) – for the period of time that the City is allowed to hold remote meetings under the cavalcade of public health orders, an elected or appointed official will have the ability to attend virtually, if needed. Due to the fluidity in which infection protocols are set and changed by Federal, State, and County the City will utilize a more flexible approach, that allows the City to conduct public meetings of the City via teleconferencing, in person and/or hybrid meetings pursuant to AB 361, or as long as the Governors Declaration of Emergency is extended.

Ways to participate?
 In-Person;
 Virtually via Zoom Video Communications;
To participate in the meeting from the comfort of your own home or office download zoom on any phone or computer device and use the following meeting ID# cityofglendora.org/zoom or https://zoom.us/j/9329247224 Want to watch?
All our City Council meetings can be watched live through Internet Streaming at www.cityofglendora.org, and/or through Spectrum cable television Channel 3 and Verizon Channel 31.

Ways to provide public comment?
You may give public comment at the commencement of the meeting when the presiding officer calls for public comment. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes, speaking once, on both on- and off-agenda items. If there are public hearings scheduled, individuals will be given an additional opportunity to comment under said items. Please follow along with the meeting via www.cityofglendora.org/meeting, GlendoraTV cable channels, or City social media live feeds to ensure you call in at the appropriate time for your item(s). To ensure that the public is able to participate, the city is providing several methods in which the public can submit their comments:

OPTION 1: IN PERSON
Public Comments can be submitted via the Public Comment Card located in the back of the room and/or by the City Clerk desk at the front of the dais. Public Comment Cards should be submitted to the Clerk upon completion and before the closing of Public Comment or Public Hearing. When your name is called, please step to the podium and state your name before beginning your presentation.

OPTION 2: LIVE COMMENTS
Public is invited to participate via Zoom Video Communications by enter meeting ID# cityofglendora.org/zoom or https://zoom.us/j/9329247224. If you wish to address the governing board on any matter posted on the agenda or within subject matter jurisdiction should utilize one of the following protocols:

Utilizing “Raise Your Hand” Feature Utilizing “Chat” Feature Call In Step 1. Virtually “raise your hand”
using zoom,
Step 2. Wait to be called on by the City
Clerk, Step 3. Unmute your audio,
Step 4. Verbalize your comments (less
than 3 minutes)
Step 1. Utilizing “Chat” send a message to
webmaster and let them know which item(s)
you wish to comment on (aka: Public
Comment, Item #?)),
Step 2. Wait to be called on by the City Clerk,
Step 3. Unmute your audio,
Step 4. Verbalize your comments (less than 3
minutes)
Step 1. Dial (669) 900-6833,
Step 2. When prompted, enter the Meeting ID
932 924 7224. Once admitted, you will hear the
meeting live,
Step 3. At the beginning of public comment
and/or the public hearing item you wish to
comment, press Star 9 to request to speak,
Step 4. Once it is your turn, you will hear an
audio command asking you to press Star 6 to
unmute your mic.

OPTION 3: E-MAIL
Public Comments can be submitted via email to [email protected] with the subject “Public Comment – Insert Governing Body and Meeting Date”. Public Comments received will be added to the associated Agenda Packet before 5:00 p.m. each day leading up to meeting (weekends and holidays excluded). Emails received in real time and prior to the commencement of Public Comment Period or Public Hearing and not already incorporated in the agenda will be read out loud (up to 3 minutes).

OPTION 4: MAIL
Public comments may be mailed to 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, ATTN: City Clerk’s Department-Public Comment. The City Clerk will read public comments received out loud (up to 3 minutes) into the public record if received before 5 p.m. on the date of the meeting. Otherwise, public comments will be considered late correspondence and incorporated into the meeting minute record.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact the City Clerk’s Department at (626) 914-8210.

Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 1

CITY OF GLENDORA

CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2023
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 116 E. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
To participate virtually, download zoom on any phone or computer device and use the following meeting ID:
cityofglendora.org/zoom or https://zoom.us/j/9329247224

MAYOR/CHAIR
Gary Boyer, District 3

MAYOR PRO TEM/VICE-CHAIR
Mendell Thompson, District 5

COUNCIL/COMMISSIONERS
Michael Allawos, District 1
Karen Davis, District 4
David Fredendall, District 2

MEETING SCHEDULE
The regular meetings of the city council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session business will commence at 6:00 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 7:00 p.m.

BROWN ACT
Agendas are drafted to accurately state what the legislative body is being asked to consider. The legislative body can take action on “all items” listed on the agenda and be in compliance with the open meeting laws.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The governing body may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting.

COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
To minimize distractions, please be sure all personal communication and electronic devices are turned off or on silent mode.

LIVE BROADCASTING AND REBROADCASTING
Regular City Council meetings are broadcast live every 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month on City Website www.cityofglendora.org, Channel 3 (Cable) & Channel 31 (Verizon) and are replayed Thursday - Sunday the week following the meeting on Channel 3 (Cable) & Channel 31 (Verizon). All broadcasts can be viewed on Cox Communications Local Access Channel 3 and Verizon/Fios Channel 31. City Council meetings are also available via live webcast and at any time for replaying through the City's webpage at cityofglendora.org/citymeetings.

Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 2

CITY OF GLENDORA

CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2023
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 116 E. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
5:00 PM CLOSED SESSION
7:00 PM GENERAL BUSINESS SESSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Closed Session business will commence at 5:00 p.m., when scheduled, and General Business Session will commence at 7:00 p.m.

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that to participate virtually, download zoom on any phone or computer device and use the following meeting ID: cityofglendora.org/zoom or https://zoom.us/j/9329247224

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

CLOSED SESSION
The regular meetings of the city council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session business will commence at 6:00 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 7:00 p.m. Closed Session discussions authorized by state law and allow the legislative body to consider/hear any matter which it is authorized by state law to hear or consider in closed session.

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with legal counsel regarding pending litigation to which the City is a party. The title of such litigation is as follows: Matthew & Mattie Reilly v. City of Glendora, USDC Case No. 2:23-cv00290-SB-PD; City of Glendora v. Lucas Wang, LASC Case No. 20PSCV00382; City of Glendora v. Beverly Jean Sullivan, LASC Case No. 21STCV33395; Jennifer Perry v. City of Glendora, LASC Case No. 21STCV43152; Josefina Rollice v. City of Glendora, LASC Case No. 21STCV43152; Jose Mojica v. City of Glendora, et al; LASC Case No. 21STCV33157; McMillan v. City of Glendora, et al USDC Case No. 2:22-CV-08100-AB-PVC; City of Glendora v. Beverly Jean Sullivan; LASC Case No. 21STCV33395; Patton v. Glendora, Case No. LASC 22STCV37752; Glendora v. 1717 GRAND HOLDINGS, LLC and SEDRAK EIKMYAN, LASC Case No. (pending case assignment)

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9 (d)(2) or (d)(3) & (e)(1) because there is a significant exposure to litigation in 63 cases.

INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
In permitting a nonsectarian invocation, the City does not intend to proselytize, advance, or disparage any faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular belief or form of invocation.  Invocation
 Pledge of Allegiance

STUDENT REPORTS
Student Reports are presented by representatives from of Charter Oak, Glendora, St Lucy’s Priory and Whitcombe High Schools. Presentations are made the fourth Tuesday of each month from September to April.

3. Presentation of High School Student Representative Report Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 3

REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENT
Three (3) Minute speaking time limit, speaking once, unless upon motion, such time is extended by the legislative body.

Any person may request to address a legislative body during a public meeting. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes, speaking once, on both on- and off- agenda items, unless, upon motion, such time is extended by the legislative body. Such statements shall only be allowed during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. If there are any public hearings scheduled, individuals will be given an additional opportunity to comment under said items.

Speakers are not permitted to yield their time to another speaker. Public comment is limited to 30 minutes at each meeting, with the ability to extend if the legislative body so chooses by majority vote.

To ensure that the public is able to participate, the City may provide a variety of ways in which the public can submit their comment: in person, virtually, email, phone call, mail and any other method which may become available. Methods of participation may be subject to change during other such times when a State of Emergency, Health Order or State Executive Order limits in-person participation.

MEMBER STATEMENTS/REPORTS

CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY STATEMENTS

SPECIAL ITEMS

4. Quarterly 2020-23 Strategic Plan Update for January 2023 (All Strategic Plan Items)

5. Presentation by Southern California Edison (SCE)

6. Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) 101 Presentation

7. Presentation by Hope Street Coalition on Homelessness (Requested by Boyer and Allawos)

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings shall conform to the protocol established to conduct of public meetings, proceedings, and business in the City of Glendora. Following presentation of the staff report, the applicant/appellant will be allowed ten (10) minutes in which to make a presentation. Following the presentation of the applicant/appellant public testimony share be called, each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes, speaking once. The Presiding Officer may permit a five (5) minute rebuttal/summation by a representative of applicant/appellant. The public hearing will then be closed, and no member of the public shall be allowed to speak further unless, upon motion, and the public hearing is reopened by the governing body. Any person desiring to provide testimony during a Public Hearing item shall make his/her presence known to the Presiding officer. Speakers are entitled to submit written or other graphic evidence. All such evidence presented shall be retained by the City Clerk as part of the Clerk’s record.

PLEASE NOTE: If you challenge any of the proposed action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

8. A Public Hearing to consider a resolution to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 72413; Variance; and Development Plan Review for a private gated development of thirteen new single-family residential lots, two private streets, a remainder parcel designated for open space, and flood control structures (Project No. PLN14-0024; Applicant: Dreamland Investments, LLC; Location: 950 North Silent Ranch Drive)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: Open and conduct the Public Hearing, accept evidence and testimony presented and in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary consider the following: 1. Adopt an Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, 2. Adopt a City Council resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72413, A VARIANCE, AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR THE GRAND ESTATES PROJECT LOCATED AT 950 NORTH SILENT RANCH DRIVE; AND CERTIFYING THE PROJECT’S INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PROJECT NO. PLN14-0024).”
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 4

CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion without individual discussion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the governing body requests specific item(s) be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered after the Consent Calendar is approved. Anyone wishing to address a Consent Calendar item should do so during the Public Comment Period.

9. Affirm minutes from January 10, 2023 regular joint meeting CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Affirm the minutes as presented.

10. City of Glendora and Glendora Successor Agency Investment Report for December 2022 CITY/AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Receive and file the Monthly Investment Activity Report for December 2022.

11. Award a contract services agreement to MDJ management for the purchase and installation of exterior led lighting project at the water yard in an amount not to exceed $119,176 (Strategic Plan Item 46-IMCIF)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award a Contract Services Agreement with MDJ Management for the Purchase and Installation of exterior LED lighting at the Glendora Water Yard in the amount of $108,341.10 with a 10% contingency in the amount of $10,834.11 for a total contract amount not to exceed $119,176; 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement with MDJ Management including minimal and/or non-substantive changes; 3. Approve an additional appropriation to this project from the Water CIP Fund 530 in the amount of $14,176; and 4. Authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount.

12. Award an Agreement to Air-Ex Air Conditioning, Inc. for Library Boiler Replacement in the amount of $94,822 (Strategic Plan Item 49-IMCIF)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15302(c) of the California Code of Regulations; 2. Award an agreement to Air-Ex Air Conditioning, Inc. for Library Boiler Replacement project in the amount of $94,822.00; 3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement with Air-Ex Air Conditioning, Inc., including minimal and/or non-substantive changes; and 4. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount.

13. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2075 Amending Section 21.06.070 of the Glendora Municipal Code Title 21 (Zoning) Regarding Outdoor Dining Standards in the Glendora Village (PLN22-0041)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Waive full reading, read by title only, and adopt on second reading Ordinance No. 2075entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 (ZONING), Section 21.06.070 (CCAP Zoning Development Standards) OF THE GLENDORA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO OUTDOOR DINING (PLN22-0041).”
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 5

14. Authorize the Purchase of a Server Refresh and Consolidation from SidePath in the amount of $136,935.88 (Strategic Plan Item 47-IMCIF)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the purchase of the server refresh hardware from SidePath in the amount of $136,935.88.

MEMBER AGENDA ITEMS

15. Recommendations to the City Council - Ad Hoc Antique Streetlight Citizen's Advisory Panel CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Moves forward with the Antique Street Light project due to the overwhelming interest from the residents in the affected assessment district area and beyond, to see this little bit of Americana be saved for posterity as well as to enhance the safety in the affected neighborhoods. To this end, the Panel recommends:
a. that the estimated funding gap ($1,969,145 - $2,282,995) be filled by the City, and that the balloting process be formally initiated to establish an assessment district; b. if the City does not fill the funding gap, delay the balloting process, and direct Public Works staff to pursue additional grant funding opportunities from local, state and/or federal governments as well as non-profit organizations;

2. Maintain the historic value of the current lights, by refurbishing where possible the existing lights and parts visible above ground;

3. Form a renewed Ad HOC committee to move into the next phase, in collaboration with the Glendora Historic Society and City Public Works to continue efforts around public outreach, firm up additional details and generally remain a conduit for the residents to speak into as the project moves on to balloting;

4. Seeks additional grant funds from local, state and/or federal governments as well as nonprofit organizations to subsidize any shortcomings beyond the current grant of $1.5 million or subsequent bid’s covering the cost related to the operationalizing and preservation of the antique streetlights; and

5. Dismiss current bid or seek additional bids and allow for the Ad HOC committee to establish a bid Task Force to aid City Public Works wherever possible in the efforts put forth to solicit bids and research where to cap the annual cost escalator. This Task Force should also form recommendations for best practices and policy recommendations to maintain proper maintenance and avoid shortfalls together with City Public Works.

NEW BUSINESS

16. Award the Contract to Doug Martin Contracting Company, Inc. for Citywide Slurry Seal Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-2023, Plan No. 1373 in an amount Not To Exceed $185,185.78 (Strategic Plan Item 46-IMCLF)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act Pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the California Code of Regulations; 2. Award the Contract to Doug Martin Contracting Company, Inc. for Citywide Slurry Seal FY 2022-2023, Plan No. 1373 in the amount of $168,350.71, with a 10% contingency in the amount of $16,835.07, for a total amount of $185,185.78; 3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement including minimal and/or nonsubstantive changes; and 4. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount.

Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 6

17. Award the contract for Mauna Loa Avenue, East of Glendora Avenue Water and Street Improvements, Plan No. 1346 & 1347, to Stephen Doreck Equipment Rentals, Inc. in the amount of $2,649,395 (Strategic Plan Item 46-IMCIF)
CITY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the California Code of Regulations;

2. Approve the Plans and Specifications for Mauna Loa Avenue, East Of Glendora Avenue Water And Street Improvements, Plan No. 1346 & 1347 in District 3; 3. Award the contract for Mauna Loa Avenue, East of Glendora Avenue Water and Street Improvements, Plan No. 1346 & 1347, to Stephen Doreck Equipment Rentals, Inc. in the amount of $2,649,395; 4. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement with Stephen Doreck Equipment Rentals, Inc., including minimal and/or non-substantive changes; 5. Authorize the Administrative Services Director to appropriate $1,355,000 by moving programmed funding from FY 2023/24 to FY 2022/23 within Water CIP Fund 530 and Measure M Fund 255; 6.

Authorize the Public Works Director to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount; and 7. Accept irrevocable offers of the easement dedication grant to the City for public utility purposes at 101 E. Duell Street and 101 E. Linfield Street, Glendora.

MEMBER/STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the Glendora City Hall bulletin board at 116 E. Foothill Boulevard and on the City of Glendora website at www.cityofglendora.org not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2.

Dated: January 19, 2023
Revised: (when applicable) Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 7

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The City Council adopted new rules relating to the conduct of public meetings, proceedings, and business in the City of Glendora on February 9, 2021 (Resolution CC 2021-02) and go into effect on April 1, 2021.

City Council meetings are also available via live webcast and at any time for replaying through the City's webpage at cityofglendora.org/citymeetings. For more information, please contact the City Clerk’s office at (626) 914-8210.

MEETING SCHEDULE
Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session business will commence at 5:00 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 7:00 p.m. Agendas are available at the following locations:
• City Clerk's Office • Glendora Public Library Government Kiosk and Bulletin Board • Crowther Teen and Family Center Bulletin Board • City's web page at cityofglendora.org/citymeetings

PUBLIC COMMENT/PARTICIPATION
Any person may request to address a legislative body during a public meeting by submitting to the City Clerk a Speakers Request form and stating the topic to be addressed. Speakers Request forms shall be available at the Council Chambers throughout the council meeting.

Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes, speaking once, on both on- and off- agenda items, unless, upon motion, such time is extended by the legislative body. Such statements shall only be allowed during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. If there are any public hearings scheduled, individuals will be given an additional opportunity to comment under said items. Speakers are not permitted to yield their time to another speaker. Public comment is limited to 30 minutes at each meeting, with the ability to extend if the legislative body so chooses by majority vote.

CURFEW
In the absence of a motion duly adopted by majority vote of the City Council, the Presiding Officer may adjourn City Council meetings at 10:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practicable. This means that under normal circumstance, the City Council will complete action on whatever agenda item is being discussed/debated at 10:30 p.m. after which the Presiding Officer shall adjourn the regularly scheduled meeting to a time certain at which time the meeting shall be reconvened as an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and action upon the published agenda continue.

STAFF REPORTS
As a general rule, staff reports, or other written documentation are prepared/organized with respect to each item of business listed on the agenda. Meeting agendas and staff reports are available at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled City Council meeting for public inspection at Glendora City Hall, via public kiosks located in the City Clerk’s office and at the Glendora Public Library during regular business hours, and on the City’s website at cityofglendora.org/citymeetings. In addition, meetings can be viewed live at the time posted on the agenda and related staff reports can be opened and viewed simultaneously along with the streaming of the meeting at cityofglendora.org/citymeetings.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL RECEIVED AFTER THE POSTING OF THE AGENDA Any supplemental writings or documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the posting of the agenda will be available for public review in the City Clerk''s Office, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, California, during normal business hours. In addition, such writings or documents will be made available for public review at the respective public meeting and via the City’s website at cityofglendora.org/citymeetings.

SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC FOR DISSEMINATION MEETINGS Any member of the public who desires to submit documentation in hard copy form may do so prior to the meeting by emailing their comments and/or information to [email protected]. This information will be disseminated.

CITY SERVICES TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO PUBLIC MEETINGS
It is the intention of the City of Glendora to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City of Irvine will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (626) 914-8210 no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II).

Assisted listening devices are available at the meeting for individuals with hearing impairments. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 35. 102-35. 104 ADA Title II) For further information, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 914-8210, or via e-mail at [email protected].

Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 8

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS DATE: JANUARY 24, 2023
FROM: CITY MANAGER DISTRICT(S): CITYWIDE
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY 2020-23 STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE FOR JANUARY 2023 (ALL STRATEGIC

PLAN ITEMS)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Receive the January 2023 Quarterly Update of the 2020-2023 Three-Year Strategic Plan; and

2. Provide input and direction on future strategic planning sessions and updates, including discussion on the City’s Mission and Vision statements and proposed 2023-2025 goals.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Over the past several years, the City of Glendora has held more than 25 strategic planning sessions to set goals, objectives, and tasks. These sessions would typically occur every six months and had been utilized to periodically update the City’s Vision/Mission Statements and Core Values. In March 2020, the COVID19 pandemic caused many organizations around the world to revisit their operations, including the City of Glendora. In July 2020, the City Council, City Staff, and members of the City’s boards/commissions met to discuss future operations moving forward. As a result of that meeting and subsequent reviews where more than 200 objectives/tasks were discussed, the City Council approved a revamped, three-year strategic plan in October 2020 that focuses on recovery from COVID-19 and key capital, staffing, homelessness and financial objects/tasks over the next three years. The 2020-2023 Strategic Plan (Strategic Plan) has been subsequently incorporated into the FY 2021-2023 Two-Year Budget adopted in June 2021 and throughout the work plans of City staff. This agenda item provides a status update on the current Strategic Plan and requests direction on the development of the 2023-2025 Two-Year Strategic Plan that will coincide with the FY 2023-2025 Two-Year Budget.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
In July 2020, the City Council met to discuss a new Strategic Plan and review its Mission Statement, Vision Statement, and Core Values. In October 2020, the City Council adopted the Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2020-21 through FY 2022-23 (2020-2023 Three Year Strategic Plan). Since adoption, periodic updates of the Strategic Plan were provided to the City Council in March 2021, June 2021, November 2021, February 2022, May 2022, and August 2022.

DISCUSSION
The July 2020 strategic planning session included a robust conversation on the current state of affairs in the City related to COVID-19 and discussion on more than 200 potential action items. Following direction from that meeting, staff prepared a comprehensive Strategic Plan that was reviewed in August 2020 approved in October 2020. Overall, the Strategic Plan is ambitious, as many of the items have significant impacts from a staff perspective (e.g. Housing Element/General Plan, software implementations), public engagement perspective (e.g. water rates, use of City property, future development), and employee engagement perspective (e.g. retention measures and personnel policies).

Item #4. Page 1
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 9
Staff Report Page 2 of 4
The adoption of the Strategic Plan, also marked a significant change from past strategic planning sessions, which had the tendency to change goals, objectives, and tasks every six months. The current Strategic Plan is for three years, which has allowed for two very important linkages – City finances and staffing assignments. Specifically, the goals, objectives, and tasks associated with the Strategic Plan were incorporated in the Adopted FY 2021-2023 Two-Year Budget and to employees through staff workplans.

Additionally, the multi-year plan allowed for clarity on timelines for multi-year projects (e.g. Gold Line) and linkages between each strategic plan objectives/tasks, should they exist. Finally, the quarterly reporting to the City Council is more robust, including both detailed and summary information on progress of each object/task under each of the six goals.

Goals
In late 2019, the City Council adopted five strategic plan goals, which were utilized as the starting point when drafting the post COVID-19 Strategic Plan, which was based on the July 2020 strategic planning session:

1. Increase financial stability and sustainability

2. Enhance and modernize the organization

3. Improve and maintain the City’s infrastructure and facilities

4. Implement strategic economic development

5. Enhance employee development and retention
Additionally, the City Council added a sixth goal during the July 2020 strategic planning session related to the significant efforts surrounding homelessness activities (e.g. community survey, hotel/motel housing, sub-regional housing efforts, etc.):

6. Implement Strategic Homelessness Solutions
Based on these six goals, the City Council adopted a Strategic Plan that outlined 57 objectives/tasks to be completed over three years, 2020-2023. Since that time five additional objective/goals were approved by the City Council to address City and community needs. The Strategic Plan Update (Attachment A), provides the status each task/object from inception of the plan. In addition to the detailed updated for each object/task, there is a summary page that provides a high-level overview of progress to date and how that compares to progress from the prior quarterly update.

Of the 62 objectives/tasks listed on the summary page (Attachment A):
 29 are completed;
 19 made progress since the last update
 14 have no progress over the last three months
 Of the 33 incomplete items:
o 9 items are at 70%+ completion
o 7 items are between 50%-60% completion
o 13 items have an estimated date that exceeds 6/30/23
Other Strategic Planning Actions
No changes were proposed to the Mission Statement, Vision Statement or Core Values during the July 2020 strategic planning session:
 Mission Statement: The City of Glendora’s mission is to provide its citizens and business community effective municipal services while maintaining our historical sense of community values.  Vision Statement: Glendora will be an inclusive, charming, and vibrant community.  Core Values: Fiscal Responsibility, Honesty and Integrity, Exemplary Customer Service, Open and Accessible Government, Accountability, Community Involvement, and A Friendly Environment New/Updated Strategic Plan
With the conclusion of the current strategic plan in June 2023, the City has begun to lay the foundation for an updated strategic plan to be adopted by that time. This work included reviewing the recently completed 2022 Community survey and meeting with the City’s management team to identify current challenges/needs and individually with each Councilmember to understand possible changes needed. Feedback received Item #4. Page 2
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 10
Staff Report Page 3 of 4
from these initial discussions will help to provide the framework for a Special City Council meeting, where strategic plan goals are set and input on objectives/tasks for each goal is received. Currently, the Special City Council meeting is set for March 9, 2023.

Based on the individual feedback from the City Council, the Special City Council Meeting Strategic Planning Session will be focused on seven strategic goals:

1. Implement Strategic Economic Development (existing goal)

2. Maintain Financial Stability and Sustainability (minor change from increase to maintain)

3. Enhance Employee Development and Retention (existing goal)

4. Enhance and Modernize the Organization (existing goal)

5. Improve and Maintain the City’s Infrastructure and Facilities (existing goal)

6. Implement Strategic Homelessness Solutions (existing goal)

7. Enhance Community Engagement and Presence (new goal) At the Special City Council Meeting, the City Council, staff and members of the City’s Board/Commissions will discuss what objectives/tasks should be included on the plan.

Additionally, the prevailing view of both staff and the City Council was that the proposed strategic plan should be for two years, and coincide with the City’s two-year budget process. As stated previously, this approach works very will with alignment or resources, both monetary and workforce.

Based on the individual feedback from the City Council, staff needs direction on whether or not to include a session for discussion on the City’s Vision and Mission statements at the City Council Special Meeting.

Staff is requesting direction from the City Council on this subject Moving forward, staff will take the feedback from this meeting and incorporate it into the March 9, 2023 Special City Council meeting. Prior to that meeting, the City Council, staff and board/commissions will be encouraged to provide their recommendations for goals/objectives under each of the proposed seven goals.

Those proposals will be discussed and where applicable, included in a Proposed 2023-2025 Strategic Plan for City Council consideration by May 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impacts associated with the January 2023 Quarterly Update of the Strategic Plan. As noted in the update, there are unique fiscal impacts associated with each objective/task. More specifically, the Strategic Plan has been incorporated into the FY 2021-2023 Two-Year Budget and any changes in funding will come before the City Council for approval.

As the City begins development of the Proposed 2023-2025 Strategic Plan, fiscal impacts associated with the goals/objectives of each new goal will be incorporated into the FY 2023-2025 Proposed Two-Year Budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not applicable.

Prepared By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Concurs With Not Applicable
Reviewed By Not Applicable
Certified to Availability of Funds Marie Ricci, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Approved By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CEQA Review Not Applicable
Item #4. Page 3
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 11
Staff Report Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENTS:

A. January 2023 Strategic Plan Quarterly Update
B. January 2023 Strategic Plan PowerPoint
Item #4. Page 4
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 12
2020-2023 THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
SUMMARY UPDATE: AUGUST 2022 TO JANUARY 2023
# Name % Complete Previous
1‐ISED Progress Made Start and Complete General Plan Housing Element Update 90% 80% Yes
2‐ISED No Change Implement Local Early Action Plan (LEAP) Grant ($150,000) 50% 50% Yes
3‐ISED No Change Begin Comprehensive General Plan Update 10% 10% Partial 4‐ISED No Change Development of a Village Vision and Development Plan 10% 10% Partial
5‐ISED No Change Development of a Gold Line (L‐Line) Vision and Development Plan 10% 10% Partial
6‐ISED No Change Complete SB2 planning grant projects ($160,000) 40% 40% Yes 7-IFSS Progress Made Sierra Madre Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) 50% 40% Partial
8‐IFSS Progress Made Water Rate Study 70% 50% Yes
9‐IFSS Complete Citizens Ad Hoc Committees Report Follow‐Up 100% 100% Yes 10‐IFSS Progress Made Implement Pro‐Active Risk Management Practices 80% 60% Yes 11‐IFSS No Change Comprehensive Fee Study and Update 0% 0% Yes 12‐IFSS Complete Recapture COVID‐19 Lost Revenues and Offset Increased Expenditures 100% 100% Yes
13‐IFSS Complete Comprehensive Purchasing Policy Review 100% 100% Yes 14‐IFSS Complete FY 2021‐2023 Two Year Budget 100% 100% Yes 15‐EEDR Progress Made Part‐Time Employee Workforce Modernization 80% 10% Yes 16‐EEDR Progress Made
Comprehensive Review and Update of all
Personnel Policy and Procedures, including the
Development and Adoption of the Employee
Employer Relations Resolution (EERR).
50% 40% Yes
17‐EEDR Progress Made Training for City Staff: to include, leadership, safety, and equity, inclusion, and diversity. 30% 20% Yes 18‐EEDR Complete Water Division Classification and Compensation Study 100% 100% Yes
19‐EEDR Progress Made Library Department Classification and Compensation Review 30% 20% Yes
20‐EEDR Progress Made Facilitate recruitments/hiring for filling vacant positions 70% 60% Yes
21‐EEDR Progress Made Employee Wellness 70% 50% Partial 22‐EEDR Progress Made Succession Planning 80% 70% Partial 23‐EEDR Complete Explore Childcare and Recreational
Opportunities for Children During COVID‐19 100% 100% Yes 24‐EMO No Change Update Urban Forestry Manual 10% 10% Partial 25‐EMO Progress Made Create a Communication Strategic Plan 30% 30% Yes 26‐EMO Complete
Conduct Elections for District 1 and 4 and Update
Council District Boundaries following 2020
Census.
100% 90% Yes
27‐EMO No Change Sunshine Ordinance for Agendas 80% 80% Yes

STRATEGIC PLAN ITEM STATUS FUNDED
1 Item #4. Page 5
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 13
2020-2023 THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
SUMMARY UPDATE: AUGUST 2022 TO JANUARY 2023
# Name % Complete Previous

STRATEGIC PLAN ITEM STATUS FUNDED
28‐EMO Complete Citizens Academy Updates 100% 90% Yes
29‐EMO Complete Community Survey Update 100% 90% Yes
30‐EMO Complete Medal of Merit Program (Program Investigation) 100% 100% Yes 31‐EMO Complete Update to Employee Group Memorandum of
Understands (MOUs) 100% 80% Yes
32‐EMO No Change Payroll Modernization 30% 30% Yes
33‐EMO Complete Business Tax License Municipal Code
Modernization 100% 60% Yes
34‐EMO Complete Paperless Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Campaign Filings 100% 90% Yes
35‐EMO Complete Community Partner Coordination 100% 80% Yes 36‐EMO Progress Made Glendora Unified School District Memorandum of Understanding 50% 30% Yes
37‐EMO Complete Short Term Rental Program 100% 100% Yes 38‐EMO Complete Review of Animal Control Program with Inland Valley Humane Society 100% 100% Yes
39‐EMO Complete Create a Coyote Management Plan 100% 100% Yes 40‐EMO Complete
Glendora Public Library Friends Foundation
Memorandum of
Understanding
100% 100% Yes
41‐EMO No Change Administrative Manual Policy Update 40% 40% Yes 42‐EMO Complete Use of Force Policy Changes 100% 100% Yes 43‐EMO Complete Provide Enhanced Activities For Seniors and Youth 100% 100% Yes
44‐EMO Complete Establishment of Technology Governance Board 100% 100% Yes 45‐EMO Complete Agreement for Supplemental Technology Services 100% 100% Yes 58‐EMO Complete Update City Council Meeting Rules 100% 100% Yes 59‐EMO Progress Made ERP System Implementation 30% 20% Yes 60‐EMO Progress Made Land Management/Permitting System
Implementation 30% 20% Yes
61‐EMO Complete Comprehensive Alley Way Review 100% 100% Yes 46‐IMCIF Complete Updated Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 100% 100% Partial 47‐IMCIF Complete Evaluate Technology Needs 100% 100% Yes 48‐IMCIF No Change Evaluate City Facility Needs 30% 30% Partial 49‐IMCIF Complete Evaluate Other Infrastructure Needs 100% 100% Partial 50‐IMCIF Complete Gladstone Park Splashpad and Renovation 100% 90% Yes 51‐IMCIF No Change First Mile Last Mile (FLM) Improvements 30% 30% Partial 52‐IMCIF Progress Made Historic Street Lights 50% 30% Partial 53‐IMCIF No Change Review Signage Requests 10% 10% Partial 54‐IMCIF Progress Made Transportation Fleet and Infrastructure Modernization 50% 30% Partial
62‐IMCIF Progress Made Council / Meeting Chambers Remodel 30% 20% Yes 55‐ISHS Progress Made Develop a Sub‐Regional Homeless Housing Program 50% 30% Partial
56‐ISHS No Change Update Homelessness Strategic Plan 80% 80% Yes 57‐ISHS Complete Supplement Homeless Operations 100% 100% Yes 2 Item #4. Page 6
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 14
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
# GOALS GOAL SUMMARY CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL DEPARTMENT(S) FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FUNDED (Y/N) FUNDING SOURCE % COMPLETE % COMPLETE (PREVIOUS) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / UPDATES 1‐ISED Start and Complete General Plan Housing Element Update TO DO: Complete and obtain certification for 6th RHNA Cycle Housing Element by February 11, 2022 deadline. TIED TO: 2‐IESD, 3‐IESD Implement Strategic Economic Development Community Development X X Yes LEAP Grant 90% 80% On December 13, 2022, the City Council adopted the 6th RHNA Cycle (2021‐2029) Housing Element. The Housing Element has been submitted to State HCD for certification, which is anticipated in January 2023. With this significant milestone, staff will begin implementing the 31 "action items" approved by the Council and incorporated into the Housing Element.2‐ISED Implement Local Early Action Plan (LEAP) Grant ($150,000) TO DO: Covers cost of Housing Element.

Identify two Housing Element sites , conduct pre‐planning investigation and yield study.Study for water/sewer utility needs for Housing Element sites near future Gold Line (L‐Line). TIED TO: 1‐IESD Implement Strategic Economic
Development
Community
Development / Public
Works
X X X Yes LEAP Grant 50% 50%
The total amount of the LEAP grant is $150K. The grant funds the Housing Element, and the following projects: 1) Study the sewer/water infrastructure capacity around the Gold Line (L‐Line) (COMPLETE); and 2) Develop a "yield analysis" of two sites around the Gold Line (L‐Line) to determine how many housing units a site will support. Specific sites will be selected from theHousing Element Sites Inventory. 3‐ISED Begin Comprehensive General Plan Update
TO DO: Current General Plan updated in 2006.The next General Plan will be developed to guide the community forthe next 20‐25 years.

Include plans for major changes (Gold Line / L‐Line, Downtown Development, Housing, Emergency Management Plan/Emergency Preparedness, Homeless Outreach Services, Public Safety, etc.) Many public meetings and input opportunities.Development of timeline for Council.

TIED  TO: 1‐IESD, 2‐IESD, 4‐IESD, and 5‐IESD
Implement Strategic Economic
Development
Community
Development X Partial General Plan Maint. Fee 10% 10%
Housing Element is adopted and submitted to State HCD for certification. A contract for consultantservices to update the Safety Element and add an Environmental Justice component will be presented to the City Council for approval in February 2023. The Safety Element update will coordinate with an update  to the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 4‐ISED Development of a Village Vision and Development Plan TO DO:  Included with General Plan Update:Study specific business allowances, zoning, and parking. Daytime business vs. Nightlife.Allowances and incentives for targeted businesses. Gold Line (L‐Line) opportunities.Coordination with businesses, Business Improvement District andrelated stakeholders.TIED TO: 3‐ISED Implement Strategic Economic
Development
Community
Development X X Partial TBD 10% 10%
The majority of the work under project will likely need to occur in concert with the General PlanUpdate.  The General Plan will establish broad policies, and the Village will be a focus area; this was the case during the 2004‐2006 General Plan update, which created the Civic Center Area Plan. The current zoning for the Village was created in 2011. A future Village Development Plan will likely be a focused project with more fine‐grained objectives for development and zoning regulation refinements.  Recently, with the addition of parklets, requests have been received for increased entertainment allowances, which is currently permitted in the Village with a CUP.  Additionally, the City has previously begun this process through a partnership with Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, where based on community feedback, students generated possible development scenarios. In December 2022, staff submitted an application for METRO TOC funding. METRO will notice grant awards in March 2023.
5‐ISED Development of a Gold Line (L‐Line) Vision and Development Plan TO DO: Included with General Plan Update:Centralized Gold Line (L‐Line) webpage and related studies.  Clearly define strategic objectives related to development around mass transit.First Mile/List Mile Development requirements.  Impacts on surrounding neighborhoods.Future vision.

Implement Strategic Economic
Development
Community
Development X X X Partial TBD 10% 10%
Similar to the Village Development Plan, the majority of this plan should occur in conjunction with the General Plan update. With the Housing Element update, staff explored appropriate densities and will study what the infrastructure needed to support future development. Also, some initial infrastructure analysis will be completed with the LEAP grant. Funding to be secured from various sources for First/Last Mile Glendora Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Improvements. It’s important to keep in mind that the Gold Line (L‐Line) Development Plan is part of the Route 66 Specific Plan. InDecember 2022, staff submitted an application for METRO TOC funding. METRO will notice grantawards in March 2023. 6‐ISED Complete SB2 planning grant projects ($160,000) TO DO: Grant projects include:

Updating entitlement process forms and check lists, acquiring computer hardware for electronic plan check review for Planning, Building, Engineering, Water, Parks and Trees.Development of informational guides (e.g. checklists, process charts, etc.).Reviewing design standards.Reviewing municipal code to eliminate confusion, where possible.

Implement Strategic Economic
Development
Community
Development / Public
Works
X X X Yes SB2 Grant 40% 40%
Updates to forms, checklists, flowcharts completed. Computer hardware acquired for electronic plan review. Remaining projects include standardized conditions of approval, adopting objectivedesign guidelines, amending code to remove barriers to housing development will continue into 2023. Under the SB2 grant, all funds must be used by August 2023. An RFP for objective design guidelines was issued, and review of proposals is nearly complete. Award of contract for services is anticipated in April‐May 2023.

IMPLEMENT STRATEGIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ISED)
ISED TOTAL=6
1 Item #4. Page 7
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 15
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
# GOALS GOAL SUMMARY CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL DEPARTMENT(S) FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FUNDED (Y/N) FUNDING SOURCE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / UPDATES 7‐IFSS Sierra Madre Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) TO DO: Initiate the voting process to re‐establish Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs), where applicable:

Education of homeowners;Updated Engineering/Maintenance Report/Costs; Hold Vote;Seek various City Council approvals Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
Public Works /
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
X X X Partial
Future District
Property Tax
Revenues and
General Fund
50% 40%
The City continues to work with the Sierra Madre neighborhood, where the LMD previously failed, to address maintenance issues that would have been covered under the LMD; the most recent outreach, including mailers and door hangers, will occur in 2023. Balloting will be conducted for Zone 2 (W. Sierra Madre Ave.), Zone 3 (N. Bana Ave/Arrow Hwy.), Zone 11 (Kregmont Dr.) and Zone 15 (Greenfield Ct.). Preliminary estimates and concepts are being refined. March 2023 ‐ Property owner workshops to be held March 2023.

May 9, 2023 ‐ Intent meeting.

May 12, 2023‐ Ballots mailedJune 27, 2023 ‐ Public hearing/ballot tabulation 8‐IFSS Water Rate Study
TO DO: Comprehensive water rate study, including: Assessment of current water infrastructure;Public Community Engagement;Review of water supply, both short/long term; Review of State Laws and Required changes; Options for water system improvements;Development of 1,5,10 and 20 year water CIP.

Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
Public Works ‐ Water
/ Admin Services X X X Yes Water Fund 70% 50%
An updated water rate framework has been presented to the City by the consultant forconsideration; City staff are in the process of reviewing the information and providing additionalinformation requested, which includes benchmarking of City's rate structure against other wateragencies and cities. The infrastructure assessment, including hydraulic analysis and priority projects (e.g. Glendora Ave Water Tank) is nearing completion. A special meeting between the City Council and Water Board will be held during the first quarter of 2023 to discuss infrastructure needs and possible rate structure changes. 9‐IFSS Citizens Ad Hoc Committees Report Follow‐Up
TO DO: Within 6 months, review recommendations of the Citizens Ad‐Hoc Committee and determine if the Strategic Plan should beamended, where applicable, implement or further explore any recommendation.

Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
City Manager's
Office X Yes Staff Time 100% 100%
Update was provided to the City Council in December 2020; no further action was taken at that time.  Staff continues to utilize the initial report and follow‐up report and findings to assist the City Council with future policy development options (e.g. South Hills, service delivery, etc.). 10‐IFSS Implement Pro‐Active Risk Management Practices TO DO: Furthering Risk Management Best Practices, includes:Recruitment of Risk Management Administrator; Development of RiskManagement Policies and Procedures; Implementation of strategies (e.g. sidewalk/tree repair, staff training, issue reporting ) to mitigate future cost increases.TIED TO: 20‐EEDR
Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
Administrative
Services ‐ Risk
Management
X X X Yes Staff Time 80% 60%
In October 2022, the City Council received an update from ICRMA regarding the City's Plan/Program.  Staff is working closely with ICRMA to implement more programs that will mitigate risks and costs.  A comprehensive Liability and Workers Compensation report is anticipated to bepresented to the City Council for review with the City Attorney to evaluate current claims.  Certain programs will be proposed in the FY 2023‐25 O&M Budget. 11‐IFSS Comprehensive Fee Study and Update
TO DO: Process to implement fee changes, includes: Issuance of anRFP for a fee study (and potentially an updated to the City's cost plan); Review of new processes providing services (e.g. revamped permit process); Benchmarking of fees with other agencies;Developing a cost recovery approach by fee type (e.g.100% for development, 75% for recreation, etc.); Public Hearings to adopt fees.                                                                                                      TIED TO: 59‐EMO Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance/ All departments
X Yes General Fund 0% 0%
The fee study will occur after the Land Management & Permitting system and ERP System implementations are completed.  Current processes and procedures will change with new technology.
12‐IFSS Recapture COVID‐19 Lost Revenues and Offset Increased Expenditures TO DO: FY 20‐21 Mid Cycle Budget projected a net General Fund change of  approximately $4 million in lost revenues and increased costs from last fiscal year and this fiscal year. In order to recapture these lost revenues and funds, City will:Advocate for HEROS Act or similar Federal Legislation; Advocate for cost reimbursements (.e.g. CARES Act, FEMA)       TIED TO: 14‐IFSS Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability City Manager X X X Yes Staff time 100% 100% The City implemented a robust advocacy plan and worked with the City's State and FederalLegislators to request financial support at the local level.  Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the City has received CARES Act ($643k), CDBG‐CV ($300k), and ARPA ($7.5 million).   With thatfunding, the City has been able to support local businesses, individuals experiencing homelessness,renters, non‐profits, and other community members ‐ a detailed plan for uses of the $7.5 million ARPA funding was approved by the City Council in late 2021.  Additionally, the City's financial position remains strong, making up the entire $4 million in lost revenue. 13‐IFSS Comprehensive Purchasing Policy Review
TO DO: Process to implement purchasing policy review. Benchmarking dollar approval limits with various agencies; Work with departmentson streamlining the process for their largest needs (e.g. supplemental staffing, capital projects, etc.);
Improving information on current bids to local community; Developing methods to purchase from local vendors, where possible;Development of contract templates.                             TIED TO: 59‐EMO Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
/ All departments
xYes Staff time and Legal Review 100% 100%
In June 2022, the City Council adopted the revised Purchasing Ordinance that went into effect in July 2022.  This action streamlines the purchasing process and makes the purchasing of goods and services more efficient by:    a) Increasing the Purchase Order threshold from $1,000 to $2,500   b) Increasing the City Manager's signing authority from $25,000 to $50,000   c) Assigning authority to the Library Board of Trustee for purchases peculiar to the Library, and;   d) Establishing a local vendor preference.Additionally, a Purchasing Coordinator has been hired. 14‐IFSS FY 2021‐2023 Two Year Budget
TO DO: FY 2021‐2023 Two Year Budget Process Includes:

Implementation of OpenGov Budget Software; Reviewing City Services to streamline organization and engage private entities, where it makes sense;Ensure Pre‐COVID‐19 financial stability;Centralize citywide facilities contracts, such as HVAC, cleaning/janitorial and elevator maintenance.

TIED TO: All ‐ IFSS items
Increase Financial Stability and
Sustainability
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance/ All departments
X X Yes Staff Time 100% 100%
The mid‐cycle review for FY 2022‐23 for City Council was approved in June 2022; only minoradjustments were experienced due to the streamlined and efficient biennial budget process implemented. In February 2023, the City Council will receive the Mid‐Year 2022‐2023 budgetupdate. Based on current projections, the City's financial position continues to be strong.

IFSS TOTAL=8INCREASE FINANCIAL STABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY (EFSS) 2 Item #4. Page 8
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 16
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
# GOALS GOAL SUMMARY CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL DEPARTMENT(S) FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FUNDED (Y/N) FUNDING SOURCE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / UPDATES 15‐EEDR
Part‐Time Employee Workforce
Modernization
TO DO: Review all part‐time positions for: Consistency across the organization (e.g. benefits); Determine what full‐time positions need a part‐time equivalent (e.g. analyst);Clarify on how PT positions are stated in the budget (e.g. number of people vs. number of budgeted hours); Provide clarity on part time positions policies andprocedures; Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources & Finance
/ affected
departments
X X X Yes Staff Time 80% 10%
City staff are finding new ways to utilize and develop part‐time employees. two recreation aides were recently hired into full‐time positions with the City. Additionally, staff are reviewing outdated job descriptions and working with Departments to update those for future development of existing employees and to provide more career growth that may be attractive to new hires. 16‐EEDR
Comprehensive Review and Update of all
Personnel Policy and Procedures, including
the Development and Adoption of the
Employee Employer Relations Resolution
(EERR).

TO DO: The City's personnel policies and procedures are in need of a significant update, including;Review of each policy/procedures; Development of recommended changes;Meet and Confer with employees on proposed changes; Approval by the City Council of each revised and new policy;The EERR is required by State Law, including the Meyers‐ Milias‐BrownAct (MMBA)", to provide reasonable and orderly procedures for theadministration of employer‐ employee relations between the City and its employeeorganizations.

Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources
XXX Yes
Staff Time &
Legal Cost 50% 40%
Over the last few months, staff has been focusing on negotiating successor agreements to MOU's that were expiring. To that end, staff learned of many challenges that will also be addressed in the major overhaul and update of the Personnel Rules and Regulations. Staff will being scheduling meetings with bargaining units to review the proposed Personnel Rules and Regulations that weredrafted by the City Attorney. 17‐EEDR
Training for City Staff: to include,
leadership, safety, and equity, inclusion,
and diversity.

TO DO: Staff is working with Claremont Graduate University (or another partner) and ICRMA, to provide access to training across all levels of the organization on equity, inclusion and diversity: Executive team and Managers ‐ leadership training;All levels of the organization, training from the City's Risk Management Third Party Administrator.

Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources & Risk
Management
X X X Yes Staff Time 30% 20%
Met with CGU and program did not appear sufficient to meet the expectations. Staff have met with other providers and are developing summaries for CM to review for recommended training providers. While the process continues to move forward, staff have made free, self‐paced, training opportunities available to staff through the City's partners. 18‐EEDR Water Division Classification and Compensation Study TO DO: Process to complete Water Division Class and Compensation Study (for certified classes)includes: Review and recommendation of updated staff job specs; Development of updated salary ranges; Meet and Confer process with employee groups;
Approval by City Council
Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources / Public
Works ‐ Water
XX Yes
Water Fund and
Staff Time 100% 100% City Council approved study changes in March 2021. All meet and confer items have been completed with the City's employee groups, and the changes have been implemented. 19‐EEDR Library Department Classification and Compensation Review TO DO: As the needs of modern libraries change, a review of theLibrary organizational structure, including job descriptions and compensation levels is required: Moving away from adult/youth/front lines/support and toward program/project management;Comparison of existing and envisioned job descriptions; Benchmarking against other agencies;Benchmarking against other employees with similar education andexperience requirements;Meet and confer with employee groups; City Council Approval
Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources / Library
X X Yes General Fund 30% 20% An Agreement has been awarded to CPSHR to conduct a classification study on the Library. 20‐EEDR Facilitate recruitments/hiring for filling vacant positions TO DO: Administrative Services/Human Resources to continue to find ways to fill vacancies by:Working with Departments to develop key recruitments;Reviewing policy changes needed to expedite hiring process, without impacting quality.

Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources / All City
Departments
X X X Yes Staff Time 70% 60%
Since July 2022, the City has filled 34 positions. There are currently 10 continuous recruitments, 23 active recruitments for 42 positions, and 8 candidates in the background process. The Human Resources Division continues to seek out the top qualified candidates for the City and are utilizing all means possible to attract the best people for the position. 21‐EEDR Employee Wellness
TO DO: Acknowledging the importance of mental health, theAdministrative Services/Human Resource Division will work to expand programs for Employee Wellness: Intentional programs/ goals to encourage healthy habits; Self‐care options;
Planned activities for individuals and families that
encourage healthy habits for mind and body.

Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources / All City
Departments
X X X Partial Staff Time 70% 50%
In September 2022, Executives, Councilmembers, and GMA decided to leave CalPERS medical for FDAC Medical. This move should result in more affordable and sustainable long term medical premiums. Moreover, staff is reinstating the Be‐Well Committee to encourage and promotemental, physical, financial, and emotional health. 22‐EEDR Succession Planning
TO DO: Administrative Services/Human Resources Division and theCity Manager's Office to develop and implement formal succession planning:Identify Departmental expectations; Develop a protocol for identify high functioning employees; Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources / City
Manager's Office
X X X Partial Staff Time 80% 70% Human Resources is looking to start certain professional development academies for key positions to further retain and train employees to grow within the organizations. 23‐EEDR Explore Childcare and Recreational Opportunities for Children During COVID‐19 TO DO: Work with GUSD/COUSD and employee groups to determine if opportunities exist to assist in facilitating child care and educational opportunities:Initiate all meetings by September 2020; Identify opportunities;Phase in changes on a first come / first serve basis by October 2020 TIED TO: 36‐EMO
Enhance Employee Development and
Retention
Community Services
/ Library /
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources
XX Yes Staff Time/ General Fund 100% 100%
GUSD and the City of Glendora have identified the Teen Center as the first joint project to assist with educational and childcare needs. GUSD will provide staffing and the City will provide space for20‐30 high school students. Additionally, the Library provided resources on Social‐Emotional Learning and partnered with GUSD on a Wellness Open House.

ENHANCE EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION(EEDR)
EEDR TOTAL=9
3 Item #4. Page 9
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 17
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
# GOALS GOAL SUMMARY CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL DEPARTMENT(S) FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FUNDED (Y/N) FUNDING SOURCE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / UPDATES 24‐EMO Update Urban Forestry Manual
TO DO: The Urban Forestry Manual provides for the policies and procedures utilized by City staff in the management and care of all trees located on City owned property and within the City's parkway areas, and in some cases regarding California native species and new developments/private property. This manual provides guidelines and specifications for the pruning, planting,removal and general care for these trees.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Public Works /
Administrative
Services
X X Partial Staff Time / General Fund 10% 10% Staff are reviewing existing materials, comparing to other municipalities and industry best practices. Staff are also evaluating the need to potentially utilize a consultant to update the policy. This work will also include a review of existing city codes related to trees. 25‐EMO Create a Communication Strategic Plan
TO DO: The Strategic Communications Plan will:Outline communication platforms, when they are utilized and sample programs;Provides framework for a Communications Task Force, comprised of multiple departments (e.g. Library and Police); Develops a plan to ensure City's Branding isconsistent and documented.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization City Clerk X X Yes Staff Time 30% 30%
This initiative is kicked off in January 2022; the initial outline has been written and currently under review. Developing internal communications assessment survey questions as first step to determining baseline data for long‐term implementation and evaluation. During the FY 2022‐23 Mid Cycle Budget, part of the staffing changes included moving a position from Community Services to the Communication Division to better centralize marketing and communications staff. 26‐EMO
Conduct Elections for District 1 and 4 and
Update Council District Boundaries
following 2020 Census.

TO DO: District Elections for November 2021, must:Be held after the completion of redistricting required by the 2020 Census;Redistrict review additional legislation that may require all elections to be held in June;Staff will hold a candidate information session for allinterested parties.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization City Clerk XXX Yes Staff Time and General Fund 100% 90% 2020 REDISTRICTING
Redistricting relating to 2020 Census was completed and the final map for Glendora City Council districts was submitted to Los Angeles County on December 14, 2021. Due to issues created by SB 415 and SB 970, the City Council, at its September 14, 2021 meeting, adopted Ordinance 2062 changing the date of the City's General Municipal Election from March of even years to November of even years beginning in November 2022 and adjust City Council terms in office accordingly. Ordinance was submitted and approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on November 2, 2021. Postcard notification of change of election date was mailed out to Glendora registered voters on November 12, 2021. 2020 Glendora City Council Redistricting has been completed and the new district maps are available via the City's website,cityofglendora.org/districts2022 GLENDORA CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONElection for District 1 and 4 will be conducted in November 2022, Resolutions calling election andsetting candidate statement requirements will be taken before the Glendora City Council in July 2022 and then submitted to Los Angeles County. July 18 ‐ August 12, 2022 is the Nomination Period. Los Angeles County has released that Calendar of Events relating to the November 8, 2022 General Election and is accessible via the City's website, cityofglendora.org/elections or via the LosAngeles County website, lavot.gov/home/voting‐election/current‐elections/upcoming‐election. As of 8/13/2022 there were two qualified candidates for Glendora City Council Member open seats associated with Districts 1 and 4. And as such, the City Council will have the option to cancel the election and appoint both individuals below on August 23, 2022.District 1: Michael AllawosDistrict 4: Karen Davis Council Members Michael Allawos for District 1 and Karen Davis for District 4 were sworn into office on December 13, 2022.
27‐EMO Sunshine Ordinance for Agendas
TO DO: A Sunshine Ordinance would, clarify and supplement the Glendora Municipal Code, the Ralph M. Brown Act, and the California Public Records Act to assure that the people of Glendora can be fully informed by publishing agenda one week in advance of regularlyscheduled public meeting. Exceptions would be provided for emergency items, and shorter timelines approved by the City Council, where needed.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization City Clerk XX Yes Staff Time and Legal Review 80% 80% For City Council meetings, in January 2022 staff began transitions to posting the agendas one week (7 days) prior to a meeting. In February 2022, postings started include all staff prepared attachments, including presentations. Exceptions will be provided for emergency items, and presentations and/or information from outside sources. As staff has transitions to a post‐COVID environment, the City has begun its transition to a 7‐day posting requirement which includes agenda, staff prepared attachments, including presentations. Once process is worked out a staff report and an ordinance for City Council consideration that will require the City to post agenda's and associated packets posted and made available to the public one week in advance of regularlyscheduled public meetings before March 1, 2023.MEETING SUCCESS RATES FOR POSTING AGENDA(S) 7 DAYS PRIOR TO MEETING Timeframe: January 2022 ‐ currentCity Council: 13 out of 32 meetings met 7 day timeframe (41%)Board/Commission: 37/ out of 41 meeting met the 7 day timeframe (90%)Remaining Task:1. Create Ordinance and Staff report for Council consideration

2. Go Live 30 day following adoption3. Market/Promote
ENHANCE AND MODERNIZE THE ORGANIZATION (EMO)
4 Item #4. Page 10
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 18
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
28‐EMO Citizens Academy Updates
TO DO: The Citizen's Academy Update wouldLook to established a citywide Citizens Academy for all City operations; Additionally, staff would review possible changes to the PoliceDepartment Citizen Academy (e.g. English as Second Language course, frequency of classes, classes aimed at different age groups) Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
City Manager /
Police XX Yes
Staff
Time/General
Fund
100% 90%
Citizen's Academy Classes resumed October 2021. Continued goal to increase frequency to promotecommunity engagement, community relations and transparency. ESL class was developed and the class recruitment is underway.  That has lead way to a program name change, going forward the program will called Community Academy. A Citywide Community Academy framework is being discussed; currently, other strategic plan objectives are taking priority. 29‐EMO Community Survey Update
TO DO: Conduct biennial Community Survey.  Look at possibility of supplemental surveys for other critical areas, including:Responsibilities of public libraries, financial structure of public libraries, and how libraries respond quickly to community needs;Homelessness;Public SafetyTIED TO: 56‐ISHS Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
City Manager's
Office X X Yes General Fund 100% 90%
In early 2021, the City Council received an update on an Interim Community Survey update that centered around increased homelessness, which rose to the number one concern in thecommunity.  An updated Community Survey questionnaire for was developed in June 2022.  True North Research, Inc. collected survey information during the mid‐July through early August 2022 timeframe. Excellent topline survey results were provided to the City Council on August 12, 2022.The final report was made available by September 2022 and results were shared with the CityCouncil in October 2022.  The results will be utilized to help assist with the development of theCity's next strategic plan. 30‐EMO Medal of Merit Program (Program Investigation)
TO DO: Within 6 Months, Staff will bring forward a Discussion on:Current City of Glendora recognition program, noting policies and criteria for awards;Proposed, Medal of Merit Program would  for individual achievement, criteria, number of awards, and other program elements have not been discussed;
Pending direction, staff will prepare a report and possible administrative policy for council consideration.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
City Clerk /
Community Services
XYes Staff Time / Council Budget 100% 100% Medal of Merit Recognition program, policy, and medal design was adopted on April 13, 2021 by Resolution CC 2021‐13 after numerous public meetings involving City Council and Community Services Commission. To date, 11 medals have been presented; all to Eagle Scouts. 31‐EMO Update to Employee Group Memorandum of Understands (MOUs) TO DO: An updated of MOUs will:Clarity and consistency across MOUs ‐ assists with future financial projections, information to employees, and processing payroll; Update to employee group Memorandum of Understands (MOUs) to reflect Tentative Agreements (TA)s and applicable side letters; Include a reorganization of the MOUs to be more user
friendly, searchable, and provide clarification of as much language as possible.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Administrative
Services ‐ Human
Resources
X X Yes Staff Time 100% 80% All Employee Group contracts have been successfully negotiated through 2024. 32‐EMO Payroll Modernization
TO DO: Payroll Modernization includes:Successful implementation of paperless paycheck stubs; Development and implementation of HR/Payroll Procedures;Successful implementation of Kronos. TIED TO: 59‐EMO Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance X X Yes Staff Time 30% 30%
Tyler Technologies Munis contract was awarded on December 13, 2022. The Payroll and TimeKeeping modules were included in the contract and will be implemented in Phase 2, which will begin in FY 2024 33‐EMO Business Tax License Municipal Code Modernization TO DO: Modernization of the City's Business License Tax MunicipalCode includes:Contracting with HdL to analyze City's business tax ordinances forimprovements;Propose changes to City Council for consideration; Development of Ordinances necessary to implement
changes.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
XX Yes Staff Time and Legal Review 100% 60%
In November 2022 the final Administrative changes to the Business License Ordinance were presented to the Council and went into effect January 2023. Staff continues to monitor customerservices and implement continued process improvements on forms and the application process.Staff will continue to monitor progress of customer service enhancement as part of the normalcourse and scope of business. Changes to the existing fee schedule would require a vote during aregularly scheduled election, which is not a priority at this time. 34‐EMO Paperless Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Campaign Filings TO DO: Transition all FPPC campaign filings to electronic only. Upload "Active and/or Open" Campaign filings to Netfile;Schedule training for Council Members and Open Committees so they can start utilizing electronic filing for submitting their January 31, 2021 statements.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization City Clerk X X Yes Staff Time 100% 90%
As of August 2021, all "OPEN COMMITTEES" campaign and disclosure filings were scanned and uploaded into NetFile to provide a centralized location for the public to accessible campaign and disclosure filings. City staff is currently working to review and conduct a cleanup of "old" campaign filings that are required to maintained. The record cleanup was completed in August 2022 and import wascompleted before January 1, 2023. 35‐EMO Community Partner Coordination
TO DO: Work to identify areas of Community Coordination with key partners, including:Partner with Coordinating Council to acknowledge/celebrate/information the community about the greatwork of community members; Work with GUSD and COUSD to identify shared needs/goals;Work with APU and Citrus College to identify opportunitiesfor partnerships.

TIED TO: 36‐EMO
Enhance and Modernize the
Organization City Manager's Office X X X Yes Staff Time 100% 80% Staff has met with Citrus College, APU, COUSD, and GUSD about areas to partner. Possible partnerships include future counseling services and expanded shared resources with GUSD and COUSD (e.g. fields, facilities, programs). In the past six months, the City and GUSD have entered into two MOU's to assist with Glendora Youth Soccer's availability to access restrooms at schoolfacilities and for the City's Youth Basketball Program to operation at with GUSD Middle Schools.

Both MOU's centered around assuring that COVID protocols were followed (e.g. cleaning, masking,etc.) and all costs were paid by the City.  In late August 2022, the City and GUSD resumed meetingswith a sub‐committee of Board and City Council members to discuss other areas of partnerships, including advocacy matters.  In November 2022, GUSD and the City held a joint Special Meeting and approved an outline on how to move forward with the City/GUSD joint use agreements. 5 Item #4. Page 11
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 19
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
36‐EMO Glendora Unified School District Memorandum of Understanding TO DO: Collaborate with Glendora Unified School District on thecreation of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to explore changes and clarify services related to: Joint Use Agreement for facilities;Crossing Guards;  School Resources Officer(s); Library Services;Complete inventory and any initial legal analysis of existing agreements;Meeting with School Districts to explore, clarify, an identify next steps TIED TO: 23‐EEDR & 35‐EMO
Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Community Services
/ Library / Police /
City Attorney/Public
Works
X X X Yes Staff Time 50% 30%
Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and administrative staffing changes at GUSD, progress on the newMOU has been slower than anticipated.  To date, staff has performed a site walk with the previous GUSD administration and have come to agreement on indemnification language.  Despite delays, the City and GUSD were able to agree upon the terms of a related MOU for bathroom use at school sites for Glendora Youth Soccer and for gym use at the junior high facilities for Glendora Youth Basketball.  Currently, City staff and GUSD staff are working on possible pool repairs at GUSD and have been engaged on water reduction measures.  In November 2022, GUSD and the City held a joint Special Meeting and approved an outline on how to move forward with the City/GUSD joint use agreements.  Additionally, staff have worked together an the needed improvements to GUSD's pool, which the City will have an $600,000 obligation to provide assistance to. 37‐EMO Short Term Rental Program
TO DO: Explore, Benchmark, and Propose a Short TermRental Program that:Addresses community concerns related to party‐houses; Establishes a "Good Neighbor Policy";Develops and Identifies program requirements and programadministration;Review related municipal code sections to strengthen tools available to address nuisance properties (e.g. party‐ homes);  Develop a short‐term rental ordinance;Work with a company to run the short‐term rental program; Incorporate Business License requirements, where
applicable.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Community
Development / Police
/ Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
X X Yes Staff Time 100% 100%
City Council, after robust discussion, adopted an urgency ordinance in 2020 adopting short‐termrental guidelines, including a Good Neighbor Policy. Review of the short‐term rental program also included staff adding additional tools to public safety staff through an increased penalty structurefor "party houses" (private and STRs). In December 2021, the City Council adopted an ordinance amending STR regulation by adding a requirement for exterior signs, reducing daytime guest hours,and limiting the number of permits to one per parcel. The amended regulations went into effect in February 2022. 38‐EMO Review of Animal Control Program with Inland Valley Humane Society TO DO: Review of Animal Control Program will include: License Process;Success of Amnesty Program;Status of unified fee structure of IVHS;Summary of alternative options for animal control services; Review of cost structure implemented by IVHS; Review of license revenue, including late fees;Review of licensing canvassing program; Summary of services provided by IVHS;Addressing community concerns Enhance and Modernize the
Organization Police X X Yes Staff Time 100% 100%
Comprehensive review was completed and presented to the City Council on December 8, 2020.

IVHS and City Staff have a continued goal to adopt a unified municipal code (amongst all IVHS contract cities) as well as a unified fee structure. As an add on, in March 2022, the City Managerwill make a recommendation to the IVHS Board that a technical advisory committee (TAC) of City Manager's from each IVHS member agency be established. The TAC would be utilized to better understand current challenges and future changes to IVHS and subsequent service delivery challenges to agencies. 39‐EMO Create a Coyote Management Plan
TO DO: Development of a Coyote Management Plan in Conjunction with IVHS and State of CA Fish and Wildlife; The intent of the plan is to provide guidance for staff and the Glendora community in managing coyotes and expectations;Policy will require City Council consideration.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization Police XX Yes
Staff
Time/General
Fund
100% 100%
After robust public feedback and partnerships with Fish and Wildlife and IVHS, a comprehensiveCoyote and Wildlife Plan was adopted in late 2020. Additionally, staff has joined the SGV COG Coyote Management Program, which has reduced most staff time related to the tracking, mapping and community engagement/access to coyote management programs and services. Website was updated in December 2021, with a program update to City Council in May 2022. 40‐EMO
Glendora Public Library Friends Foundation
Memorandum ofUnderstanding
TO DO: Work with Friends Foundation to established an updated MOU.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Library / City
Attorney XX Yes
Staff Time and
Legal
Review
100% 100%
Foundation and City staff have exchanged draft changes for approximately two years; representatives from City Council, Foundation, City administration, legal counsel, and Library administration conferred over final points of clarification. GPLFF and Library Board recommended approval by Council, which occurred at the January 25 Council meeting. MOU was declared fully executed by City Clerk in April 2022. 41‐EMO Administrative Manual Policy Update
TO DO: The City's current administrative manual policy is outdated. To update the policies, staff must:Work with each City department on polices applicable to their area; Research, benchmark, and review for conformance with existing systems, rules/regs, etc.;Meet and confer with employee groups, where necessary; Seek City Council approval, where necessary.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
City Clerk / All
Departments XXX Yes
Staff Time and
Legal Review 40% 40%
Received approval in FY2021‐22 budget to utilize a Policy Management Software. Kick‐off meeting was held in February 2022 to review the City's current "Administrative Manual" and its policy structure for other areas of the City (e.g. City Council policies, administrative policies, personnel policies, financial policies, etc.). In June 2022, staff conducted a final review of current policies associated with departments and submitted recommendations for areas that needed updates. In July 2022, a list of system users was created in PolicyStat that defined users and roles of staff members that will be involved in creating, reviewing, updating and approving City policies.Next Steps:Submit organizational structure and policy template, including section descriptions, and policy definitions to City Manager for input no later than February 2023. 42‐EMO Use of Force Policy Changes
TO DO: Use of Force Policy Changes, includes:Advocating for a comprehensive review process, involving a spectrum of stakeholders, across all agencies in California; Adopt any legislative changes; Enhance and Modernize the
Organization Police XXX Yes Staff Time and Legal Review 100% 100% Completed, with typical on‐going into calendar year 2023. New legislation such as SB2 will have local impacts on the Police Department. Body Worn Cameras as an approved budget item in adopted budget, paired with Use of Force Policy Changes, enhances public trust and transparencywhile providing modernization (reaching industry standards). 6 Item #4. Page 12
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 20
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
43‐EMO Provide Enhanced Activities For Seniors and Youth TO DO: During COVID‐19, staff is currently reviewing all classes and offering to determine:How best to provide classes to 14 of fewer individuals; Possibility of adding Snow Day;Options to continue to annual Halloween event; Leverage grant and fundraising opportunities; Attract/sponsor new civic/community events that centeron a variety of cultural celebrations.

Enhance and Modernize the
Organization Community Services X Yes Staff Time 100% 100% Staff offered Recreational classes outdoors in adherence with current LA County Department of Public Health Guidelines. Staff members created 2 new classes, led by recreation staff which encouraged kids 6‐12 to get outside and be active. One class had PE type games and activities each class, the other class was an outdoor hiking club. Events that were added/changed due to restrictions were: drive‐thru Easter, drive‐thru Earth Day, Virtual 4th of July Home Decorating Contest, drive around monster hunt, Virtual Halloween Costume Contest, Virtual Halloween Home Decorating Contest, Santa Express drive‐thru, Virtual Christmas Tree Lighting. For Seniors, we offered an online Coffee & Chat where seniors met once a week to stay connected. When they were able to come back in person, we started offering an in person Coffee & Tea on the porch of the La Fetra Center. The Nutrition Program pivoted to a drive‐thru once a week lunch pick up with 2 box lunches and 3 frozen lunches.
44‐EMO Establishment of Technology Governance Board
TO DO: Establishment Technology Governance Board  will include key stakeholders from each department that meet regularly to guide the City’s current and future technologyneeds.                                                         TIED TO: 47‐IMCIF, 59‐EMO, & 60‐EMO Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
IT / Add
Departments X X X Yes Staff Time 100% 100%
The Technology Committee has been established and staff members from each City Department have been identified. The first meeting occurred in the middle of February 2022 and has continued providing updates to the Executive Team on recommendation and future investments needed. 45‐EMO Agreement for Supplemental Technology Services
TO DO: The Technology Division will work with City
departments to:Identify ongoing funding for as‐needed technology services; Identify services needed to better utilize and expand existing software capabilities;Identify services needed to provide recommendations on specific needs (e.g. new workflows, report writing, etc.)TIED TO:  14‐IFSS, 44‐EMO, 47‐IMCIF, 59‐EMO & 60‐EMO Enhance and Modernize the
Organization IT / All Departments XXX Yes Staff Time and IT Fund 100% 100% While the City undertakes several large technology projects (e.g. ERP and Land Management), staff  included budget for supplemental staffing services to provide assistance with implementation,optimizations, and ad‐hoc services (e.g. report writing, future system integrations, etc.).  To assist with the interim work of the RFP facilitation for the ERP and Permitting Systems, staff has contracted with Client First.  Additionally, the City through its FY 2022‐23 Annual Budget, moved to a hybrid IT staffing model.  On August 23, 2022, the City Council will be asked to formally approve a multi‐year agreement with SDI Presence for contracted IT services. 58‐EMO Update City Council Meeting Rules
TO DO: Review City Council meeting rules with the City Council to determine what changes are necessary.

TIED TO: 41‐EMO
Enhance and Modernize the
Organization City Clerk's Office X X Yes Staff Time 100% 100% City Council met on several occasions to review public meeting protocols and inconsistency with council policy (Resolution 07‐17) and current practice.  During this review changes there were 6 major areas of consideration: i) Council Directives; ii) Public Meeting Regulations and Governing Proceedings; iii) Protocol Inconsistencies; iv) Discussions with City Attorney and City Manager; v) Provide Flexibility and Increase Productivity; and, vi) COVID Pandemic, Restrictions and Available Technologies.  Changes incorporated related to: 1) meeting curfew; 2) Community recognitions; 3) Order of Business; 4) Rules of Parliamentary Procedure; 5) City Council Regular Meetings; and 6) Protocols apply to all City of Glendora Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. In February 2021, Ordinance No. 2058 and Resolution CC 2021‐02 were adopted which established new rules for theconduct of public meetings, proceedings and business and went into effect starting April 2021. 59‐EMO ERP System Implementation
TO DO: Replacement of the City's existing enterprise resource planning system (ERP), which typically includes finance, budgeting, purchasing, human resources, payroll, central cashiering, AR/AP, and related functions.TIED TO: 47‐IMCIF & 60‐EMO
Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Administrative
Services / IT X X X Yes Fund 321 30% 20% In December 2022, The City Council awarded the Financial and Land Permitting software to Tyler Technologies.  Kick off meetings are scheduled in February 2023. 60‐EMO Land Management/Permitting System Implementation TO DO: Replacement of City's Land Management/Permitting System, which typically includes online plan submittal,Planning/Building/Engineering permits, Code Enforcement, Special Permits, Right‐of‐Way permits, integration with GIS system, other land development approvals.TIED TO: 47‐IMCIF & 60‐EMO Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Community
Development / IT X X X Yes Fund 321 30% 20%
On December 13, 2022, the City Council approved a contract with Tyler to acquire the Energov permitting and land management system. Implementation will commence in January 2023, with an anticipated "go‐live" date of June‐July 2024.
61‐EMO Comprehensive Alley Way Review
TO DO: Complete an assessment of alley ways; mapping, delineation,community input, stakeholder input, develop local legislation to address findings, which may include an enforcement and community outreach component.TIED TO:  29‐EMO Enhance and Modernize the
Organization
Police Department /
Public Works XX Yes Staff Time and Legal Review 100% 100% Comprehensive review presented to City Council over several sessions. After council direction, local legislation (a Glendora Municipal Code) was authored, presented and approved by council. Codewill became effective and enforceable on November 24, 2021. Continued community education and outreach occurred for another 30 days (warnings) before the full enforcement strategy will commence.   Since that time, staff has performed additional outreach via mailers and door hangers, much recently in July 2022.

EMO TOTAL=26
7 Item #4. Page 13
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 21
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
# GOALS GOAL SUMMARY CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL DEPARTMENT(S) FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FUNDED (Y/N) FUNDING SOURCE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / UPDATES 46‐IMCIF Updated Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
TO DO: Develop a 1, 2, 5 and 10 ‐ year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP):

Prioritization of projects based on facility/technology/infrastructure assessments, community needs and City Council input; Identify available funding sources; Establish realistic completion timelines.

TIED TO: All items under IMCIF
Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
/ Public Works
X X X Partial Various 100% 100%
Development of the updated CIP has leveraged other City plans (e.g. facility assessment, quality of streets, technology needs, assessment of water assets), including the identification of funding sources.   The Quarterly Capital Improvement Program Update was presented to City Council on May 10, 2022, with the next update to be presented in September, 2023. Four water and street projects to begin construction in early 2023.  The Active CIP Project list, Completed Projects, Upcoming Projects, and Pavement Management Program on available on the City website.  During the Mid‐Cycle budget review in June 2022, the City Council amended the CIP to fund additionalprojects. Projects for the FY 21‐23 CIP as listed in the budget are underway. 47‐IMCIF Evaluate Technology Needs
TO DO: Evaluation of Technology projects will include: Kronos (time keeping);
network/wi‐fi upgrades;Library mobile app (greater access to information/materials);Infosend (utility billing print/mail, online services, automated phone payments)Trackit Upgrade (permitting system);Geographic Information System (GIS) implementation; Electronic records management system (EDMS)TIED TO: 44‐EMO, 45‐EMO, 46‐IMCIF, 59‐EMO & 60‐EMO Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
/ IT
X X X Yes Various 100% 100%
COVID‐19 has highlighted a number of technology needs and changes. Almost all major systems arein need of a replacement or upgrade, including ERP,  Land Development and GIS; the City was ableto set aside money to fund these critical projects as part of FY 2021‐2023 Two‐year Budget.Investment in technology is crucial to future operations and the City's ability to better serve the community.  Since the last update, further identification of the City's needs, including betterinternet data capacity, Wi‐Fi, GIS and a Library App have all been funded and moved forward as active project.  The evaluation of technology needs is complete; however, the process is always ongoing. The Glendora Public Library app went live in May 2022, and is available for both Apple and Android users.
48‐IMCIF Evaluate City Facility Needs
TO DO: Evaluation of City Facility projects includes: Additional requirements/upgrades needed for COVID‐19 compliance to maximize use and re‐open to the public; Completion of space planning and City facility need assessment;La Fetra Center, Teen Center, Legion Building, Scout Hut, Youth Center;Library, both from a service, space utilization and technology standpoint.TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF, 47‐IMCIF & 62‐IMCIF Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
/ Public Works /
Community Services
/ Library
X X X Partial Fund 321 30% 30%
Five proposals were received for Citywide Facility Condition Assessment. Staff are evaluating proposals and anticipate recommending award in September 2022, with completion of theassessment by March 2023. 49‐IMCIF Evaluate Other Infrastructure Needs
TO DO: Evaluation of Other Infrastructure needs includes: Review of updated road quality/scoring reports (consolidate w/CIP);   Review of needs for open space assets, including, South Hills, Big Dalton, and Urban Trail; Pursue funding to complete Phases 2 and 3 of San Dimas Wash, and a new trail utilizing Big Dalton Wash.

GOAL DATE:TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF & 51‐IMCIF
Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Administrative
Services ‐ Finance
/ Public Works /
Community
Development
X X X Partial Various 100% 100%
Staff has secured approximately 50% of the funding for the People Movement Project including Glendora/Foothill Boulevard improvements, San Dimas/Big Dalton/Little Dalton wash urban trailprojects. Staff will continue to pursue opportunities to share the benefits of Urban Trails with the community. Staff is reviewing street condition criteria, planning for FY24‐25 street projects.  In addition to the transportation projects, staff has identified an opportunity to facilitate additional recreation opportunities in South Hills, including various forms of biking.  Staff will continue to evaluate options as they come forward. 50‐IMCIF Gladstone Park Splashpad and Renovation
TO DO: Work with Public Works to renovate Gladstone Park with anew splash pad, covered picnic shelter, expanded parking lot, and new playground surfacing.TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF
Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Public Works /
Community Services X X Yes Various 100% 90%
Gladstone Park improvements will require a combination of grant funds (e.g. Prop 68), future grant opportunities (e.g. Measure A), Measure E, and Water Fund.  The improvement will require a phased approach, beginning with a new all‐inclusive playground equipment to ensure equal playopportunities for all children. This project has been funded in the FY 21‐22 Capital Improvement Projects and was completed in May, 2022. The splashpad portion of the project has been canceled due to the California drought.  The demolition of the existing tank and surrounding parking lot improvement are nearly complete with the parking lot to open to the public in September, 2022.The project  created additional parking, but will reserve available space in the event that another tank will need to be installed. If funding is secured, staff would like to install a shade structure to allow for additional picnic space for residents.
51‐IMCIF First Mile Last Mile (FLM) Improvements
TO DO: Pursue grant funding for Glendora Avenue, Ada Avenue, and Foothill Blvd. improvements. The first project is Glendora Avenue, with a goal to complete construction prior to Gold Line Phase 2B commencing passenger service (2025/2026).TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF & 49‐IMCIF Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Community
Development / Public
Works
X X X Partial TBD 30% 30%
Staff has secured approximately $12 million in funding for the People Movement Project. Phase 1 includes Glendora Avenue and Foothill Boulevard improvements, San Dimas and Little Dalton Wash Urban Trail  projects. Design and construction plans for the San Dimas Wash, Glendora Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard to be completed by Summer 2023, with construction to occur in late 2023. Funds are still needed to complete the Big Dalton Wash and additional first/last mile improvements on Ada Avenue and Vermont Avenue. Staff secured bus stop enhancement grant funds for Glendora Avenue/Route 66. Installation will be complete in early 2023. 52‐IMCIF Historic Street Lights
TO DO: Initial project cost estimates ranged between $1.5 ‐ 3 million depending on updated engineering drawings and allowable methodsused.TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
City Council / Public
Works X X X Partial Fund 321/TBD 50% 30%
Through the State's appropriation process, Senator Portantino worked to secure $1.5 milliontowards this project. Final designs were completed, and the project was publicly advertised for bid,with the bid opening in October 2022.  As no bids were received, the project was publicly bid a second time, with a bid opening in December 2022.  An ad‐hoc citizen's advisory panel was formed to provide input on the potential for the creation of an Antique Streetlight Maintenance Assessment District.  The Panel will present its recommendations at the at the January 24, 2023 meeting.

IMPROVE AND MAINTAIN THE CITY'S INFASTRUCTURRE AND FACILITIES (IMCIF) 8 Item #4. Page 14
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 22
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
53‐IMCIF Review Signage Requests
TO DO: Review opportunities for enhanced signage in the Downtown area by:Replacing/refurbishing Historical District sigs; Exploring "Glendora"arches at gateway locations (e.g. Glendora Avenue); Updating Civic Center signage needs;Review Gold Line (L‐Line) Station Signage Plan;TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Community
Development / Public
Works
X Partial Fund 321 10% 10% Currently, staff is keeping an inventory of signage needs for discussion. 54‐IMCIF Transportation Fleet and Infrastructure Modernization TO DO: Continue to update the City's Transportation Fleetand capabilities by:Using grant funding to acquire one zero‐emission large van; Using grant funding to acquire two dial‐a‐ride vans; Using grant funding toacquire/implement new dispatching software;Identify funding and opportunities to expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure.TIED TO: 46‐IMCIF
Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities
Community
Development X X X Partial Grants and Trans. Funds 50% 30% ChargeReady Transport Program Agreement is completed and four changers and two zero‐emission buses are on order. SoCal Edison is developing final site plans and then will proceed to construction, with completion estimated in June 2023. Four replacement dial‐a‐ride vans were purchased andplaced into service. Dispatching software is in the testing phase and will be rolled out by Fall 2022.

Staff is investigating necessary facility upgrades and seeking funding. 62‐IMCIF Council / Meeting Chambers Remodel
TO DO: Expand and modernize the City's City Council Chambers:

Increased capacity;
Updated lighting, audio and visual equipment;
Expanded outdoor waiting area for larger audiences;
Address possible ADA issues.

TIED TO: 48‐ IMCIF
Improve and Maintain the City's
Infrastructure and Facilities Public Works XX Yes Fund 321 / ARPA 30% 20% Staff selected ONYX, an architectural firm to prepare 3 layout concept plans that were presented to the City Council in November 2023. Based on feedback, the staff will look into a fourth option that consists of improvements within the existing footprint of City (what currently exists, but consider moving internal walls), with the addition of a patio/seating area and closed session chambers.

Updated designs and cost estimates will be provided to the City Council for consideration in March 2023.

IMCIF TOTAL ‐ 10
9 Item #4. Page 15
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 23
2020-2023 Three -Year Strategic Plan
January 2023 Update
# GOALS GOAL SUMMARY CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL DEPARTMENT(S) FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FUNDED (Y/N) FUNDING SOURCE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / UPDATES 55‐ISHS Develop a Sub‐Regional Homeless Housing Program TO DO: The San Gabriel Valley can be broken up into sub‐ regions. As it relates to homelessness, the Foothill communities of Glendora, SanDimas, Glendora and Claremont are considered a sub‐regional for this project. Staff will work with the County of Los Angles, LAHSA, State ofCalifornia, and local agencies to develop a sub‐regional homelessness strategy, including short‐term and long‐termhousing options.

Implement Strategic Homelessness
Solutions
Community Services
‐ Human Services X X X Partial TBD 50% 30%
Staff is working with the County of Los Angeles and LAHSA to provide funding, both capital and operational for future projects. Staff worked with the cities of La Verne, San Dimas, and Claremonton the project, but were unable to gain assurances on the project deliverables from each City (e.g. guaranteed emergency beds, access center, etc.). Additionally, this project seems to have taken a backset to the Blue Ribbon Commission on Homelessness. The City Manager and Assistant City Manager testified before to the commission on November 3, 2021 and that testimony has beenutilized in the draft recommendations, which includes allocating more funding to local agencies.

With City Council direction staff to exploring the possibility of a project within the community to serve the local population of individuals experiencing homelessness. 56‐ISHS Update Homelessness Strategic Plan
TO DO: The City's Homelessness Strategic Plan was developed in 2017 and 2018. Since that time, many changes have occurred at funding level (e.g. LAHSA Measure H grants), case law level (e.g. Boise), and City level (e.g. Hotel/Motel Housing). Updates will provide clarify into specific strategic initiatives over the next 3‐5years.

Implement Strategic Homelessness
Solutions
Community Services
‐ Human Services
X X Yes Staff Time 80% 80%
Staff will work with the County of Los Angeles, LAHSA, and the SGVCOG to determine if additional Measure H funds are available for this project. The Homeless initiative has changed their number of strategies to simplify the process. However, in the interim, staff have completed a community survey on homeless and performed its own PIT count to better understand the City's homeless community and their needs. Additionally, staff is gearing up to support the upcoming PIT count ledby LAHSA. 57‐ISHS Supplement Homeless Operations
TO DO: Continue to apply and secure grants and other forms offunding for the needs of Glendora's homeless community. Grant opportunities may include temporary housing, permanent housing,job programs, and transportation. Additionally, continue therelationship with LA County Department of Mental Health to facilitatethe MET program and other similar related programs.

Implement Strategic Homelessness
Solutions
Community Services
‐ Human Services
XXX Yes
Staff Time /
Grant Funding /
ARPA
100% 100%
In August 2020, Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (DMH) partnered with Community Services to address mental illness follow up with housed homeless. As of September 2020, MET is back up and running for patrol interactions, while grant funding is available. The Human Services/Homeless staff, Glendora Police Department, MET team, LAHSA, Union Station Homeless Services has been having monthly meeting with LA County Department of Mental Health on 10‐12 individuals that are homeless and have severe mental health problems. Additional operations the City has undertaken are regular encampment clean‐ups and service delivery to those impacted individuals, purchase of a vehicle to assist with transportation and service delivery (whichis currently being prepared for use), an independent PIT, long‐term agreements with motels foraccess to rooms for emergency beds, and investigation of a change of service providers from Union Station to a company with access to a guaranteed number of emergency shelter beds. Long‐term agreements continues with motels for access to rooms for emergency beds. The City awarded a contract with LA CADA paid with ARPA funds. This contract provides the City with 8‐beds, casemanagement, and wrap around services. While the City has been successful in supplementing homeless operations, additional services may be added at a later date, subject to available funding (e.g. interim/emergency housing).

IMPLEMENT STRATEGIC HOMELESSNESS SOLUTIONS (ISHS)
ISHS TOTAL=3GRAND TOTAL=62
10 Item #4. Page 16
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 24
Strategic Planning Quarterly
Update
City Manager’s Office
City Council
January 24, 2023
Adam Raymond, City Manager CityOfGlendora.org
Item #4. Page 17
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 25
2 BACKGROUND
• October 2020, the City adopted the Strategic Plan
for Fiscal Years 2020-21 through FY 2022-23
(2020-2023 Strategic Plan)
o March 2021, Strategic Plan update to City Council
o June 2021, City Council adopted FY 2021-2023 TwoYear Budget (incorporated the strategic plan goals/objectives)
o November 2021, Strategic Plan update to City Council
Item #4. Page 18
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 26
3 BACKGROUND
o February 2022, Strategic Plan update to City Council
o May 2022, Strategic Plan Update with FY 2022-23
Budget adoption
o August 2022, Strategic Plan update to City Council
Item #4. Page 19
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 27
4 2020-2023 STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
• Increase financial stability and sustainability (FINANCIAL) • Enhance and modernize the organization (MODERIZATION) • Improve and maintain the City’s infrastructure and facilities (INFRASTRUCTURE)
• Implement strategic economic development (ECONOMIC
DEV.)
• Enhance employee development and retention (EMPLOYEES) • Implement Strategic Homelessness Solutions
(HOMELESSNESS)
Item #4. Page 20
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 28
5 GOAL SUMMARY
City Council adopted 62 objectives/tasks be
considered over the next three fiscal years:
• FINANCIAL – 8
• MODERIZATION – 26
• INFRASTRUCTURE – 10
• ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – 6
• EMPLOYEES – 9
• HOMELESSNESS – 3
Item #4. Page 21
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 29
6 QUARTERLY UPDATE CHAGNES
• Quarterly Update of the 2020-2023 Strategic Plan includes a Summary Page
o List of all items
§ Status (completed, in-progress, not started)
§ % complete (10% increments)
§ Change from last update
§ Funding (type or status)
• Detailed report, still included
Item #4. Page 22
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 30
7 QUARTERLY UPDATE SUMMARY
• Of the 62 objectives/tasks
o 29 items are completed
o 19 items showed progress made
o 14 items were unchanged
o Of the 33 incomplete items:
§ 9 items are at 70%+ completion
§ 7 items are between 50%-60% completion
§ 13 items have an estimated date that exceeds
6/30/23
Item #4. Page 23
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 31
8 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• FINANCIAL
o Water rate and infrastructure study is underway
with a special meeting scheduled for February
28, 2023 (8-IFSS)
o Adopted FY 2022-23 Budget Mid-Year Update
scheduled for February 2023 (14-IFSS)
Item #4. Page 24
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 32
9 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• MODERNIZE
o District Elections/Appointments Complete (26-
EMO)
o Completed Community Survey (29-EMO)
o ERP and Planning Software Agreements approved
and implementation underway (59/60-EMO)
Item #4. Page 25
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 33
10 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• INFRASTRUCTURE
o People Movement Project funding and advocacy
efforts have been successful with $5 million in
additional funding (51-IMCIF)
o Historic Street Light Assessment, project cost
estimates, and committee work underway (52-
IMCIF)
Item #4. Page 26
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 34
11 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• INFRASTRUCTURE
o Gladstone Park Project Completed (50-IMCIF)
o City Council Chamber Remodel Design Options
presented to Council (62-IMCIF)
Item #4. Page 27
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 35
12 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
o Housing Element approved by the City Council
(1-IESD)
Item #4. Page 28
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 36
13 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• EMPLOYEES
o New labor agreements with all sworn and nonsworn staff (20-EEDR) o Approx. 50% completion of updated personnel
policies and procedures (16-EEDR)
Item #4. Page 29
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 37
14 GOAL HIGHLIGHTS
• HOMELESSNESS
o Council direction provided on property locations
for possible interim housing sites (55-ISHS)
Item #4. Page 30
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 38
15 2023-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT
The City has begun to lay the foundation for an
updated strategic plan to be adopted by that time.
• Recently completed 2022 Community survey
• Meetings:
o City’s management team to identify current
challenges/needs
o Councilmembers to understand possible
changes needed
Item #4. Page 31
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 39
16 2023-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT
• General Takeaways from preliminary conversations:
o Movement from six goals to seven
o Clarity needed on possible changes to Mission
Statement and Vision
o Strategic Plan should be 2 years long and coincide with City’s two-year budget process
o Strategic Planning Session on March 9, 2023
Item #4. Page 32
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 40
17 2023-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT
• 2023-2025 Draft Goals
o Implement Strategic Economic Development (existing goal) o Maintain Financial Stability and Sustainability (minor change from increase to maintain)
o Enhance Employee Development and Retention (existing goal) o Enhance and Modernize the Organization (existing goal) o Improve and Maintain the City’s Infrastructure and Facilities (existing goal)
o Implement Strategic Homelessness Solutions (existing goal) o Enhance Community Engagement and Presence (new goal)
Item #4. Page 33
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 41
18 2023-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT
• Mission Statement: The City of Glendora’s mission is to provide its citizens and business community effective municipal services while maintaining our historical sense of community values.
• Vision Statement: Glendora will be an inclusive, charming, and vibrant community.
• Core Values: Fiscal Responsibility, Honesty and Integrity, Exemplary Customer Service, Open and Accessible Government, Accountability, Community Involvement, and A Friendly
Environment
Item #4. Page 34
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 42
19 QUESTIONS
www.CityofGlendora.org/StrategicPlan
Item #4. Page 35
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 43
20 RECOMMENDATIONS
That the City Council:

1. Receive the January 2023 Quarterly Update of the
2020-2023 Three-Year Strategic Plan; and

2. Provide input and direction on future strategic
planning sessions and updates, including
discussion on the City’s Mission and Vision
statements and proposed 2023-2025 goals
Item #4. Page 36
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 44
Item #5. Page 1
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 45
2 • Southern California Edison (SCE)
is an Edison International
company
• One of the nation’s largest
electric utilities
• More than 130 years of history
• Headquartered in Rosemead,
California
• Regulated by the California
Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC)
• 50,000 square miles of SCE
service area across Central,
Coastal, and Southern California
• 15 million residents through 5
million customer accounts
• 15 counties, 185 cities and 13
Native American tribes
Who We Are Item #5. Page 2
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 46
Our Grid
To deliver safe, reliable, and affordable power,
we monitor and maintain a vast electricity system
730,000 Transformers
126,000 Miles of Transmission
and Distribution Lines
4,600 Circuits

1.7 Million Poles
50,000 Square Miles
3 Item #5. Page 3
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 47
Strengthening and Modernizing the Grid
• Infrastructure reliability – updating
underground cables, poles, switches, and
transformers
• Wildfire mitigation – hardening infrastructure,
bolstering situational awareness capabilities,
and enhancing operational practices
• Transmission – connecting renewables,
installing new substations, and updating lines
• Grid readiness – updating the grid for impacts
from new technologies
• Long-term energy policy – supporting energy
storage, electric vehicles, and renewables
SCE plans to spend more than $5B each
year to maintain, improve, and harden
its infrastructure
SCE’s investments support safe, reliable, affordable, and clean energy for our customers 2021 Capital Investments

91.7 miles of
underground cable replaced
146.5 miles of overhead conductor
replaced for public safety

34.5k distribution poles replaced

3.9k transmission poles replaced
29 underground structure
replacements
4 Item #5. Page 4
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 48
Protecting Public Safety: Wildfire Mitigation Activities 2021 Year-End Progress Report – Data as of 12/31/21 5
Item #5. Page 5
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 49
Protecting Public Safety: Public Safety Power Shutoffs
6 • SCE implements Public Safety Power
Shutoffs (PSPS) to temporarily shut off power
to some communities when there is a high risk
for wildfire to prevent the electric system
from becoming the source of ignition
• PSPS is used as a measure of last resort to
protect public safety under dangerous fire
weather conditions, including high winds,
low humidity, and dry vegetation
• Multiple methods are used to notify
customers and stakeholders in impacted areas
before, during and after a PSPS event
• SCE provides resources to support customers
during PSPS and offers several programs and
rebates to help customers be prepared and
more resilient during emergencies
• SCE is working to reduce the impact of PSPS
and is continuing to strengthen the electric
grid to become more resilient in the face of
extreme weather events
• To learn more, visit sce.com/psps
Item #5. Page 6
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 50
Pathway 2045:

Key steps California must take to reach carbon neutrality Creating a Clean Energy Future
7 100% of grid sales with
carbon-free electricity
80 GW of utility-scale
clean generation
30 GW of utility-scale
energy storage
70% of all buildings will
use efficient electric
space and water heating
90% fewer GHG
emissions from allelectric homes
26 million electric
vehicles
Over 1 million
electrified medium
and heavy duty
vehicles
50% reduction in natural
gas consumption
40% of the remaining
natural gas is
biomethane and
hydrogen
Item #5. Page 7
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 51
Creating a Clean Energy Future: Mind the Gap
8 Item #5. Page 8
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 52
Reliability Overview
9 Item #5. Page 9
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 53
10 What is Reliability?
• In simplest terms:

Having dependable electricity when you need it.
• Outages:
• Maintenance outages (aka planned outages)
• Repair outages (aka unplanned outages)
• Sustained Outage = An outage lasting > 5
minutes
• Momentary Outage = An outage lasting ≤ 5
minutes
• Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS)
• Major Event Day (MED)
Major Event Day (MED) : A day in which the daily system SAIDI exceeds a threshold value. For the purposes of calculating daily system SAIDI, any interruption that spans multiple calendar days is accrued to the day on which the interruption began. Statistically, days having a daily system SAIDI greater than a threshold value are days on which the energy delivery system experienced stresses beyond that normally expected (such as severe weather). MEDs are sometimes excluded in reporting; in those reports the exclusions will be noted.

Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) : An operational protocol that SCE implements under extreme weather conditions in order to minimize the threat of wildfires and keep communities safe from potentially dangerous situations. These types of sustained outages are temporary and usually involve situations where high fire areas are experiencing adverse weather or public safety is at risk.

Item #5. Page 10
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 54
11 How Do We Measure Reliability?
Total minutes
every SCE
customer was
without power
due to sustained
outages
Total number of
customers
SAIDI
System Average
Interruption
Duration Index
Total number of
sustained
customer outages
experienced by
SCE customers (CI)
Total number of
customers
SAIFI
System Average
Interruption
Frequency Index
Total number of
momentary
customer outages
experienced by
SCE customers (CI)
Total number of
customers
MAIFI
Momentary
Average
Interruption
Frequency Index
What’s the average
amount of time my power
service will be
unexpectedly interrupted?
What’s the average
number of times my
power service will be
unexpectedly interrupted?
What’s the average
number of times my
power service will be
momentarily (< 5 minutes)
interrupted?
Item #5. Page 11
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 55
12 11
Item #5. Page 12
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 56
Equipment Failure In-service failure of transformer, switch, or conductors Vegetation/Animal A tree branch, rodent, or bird causing a short circuit between conductors
Other The circuit was patrolled but no cause found
Operations SCE performed urgent maintenance without the standard 3-day notice
3 rd Party Outage caused by a balloon, car hit pole or dig-in PSPS Public Safety Power Shutoff
sce.com/psps
SAIDI & SAIFI Cause Definitions
13 Item #5. Page 13
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 57
14 BarChart
Item #5. Page 14
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 58
15 SAIDIChart
Item #5. Page 15
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 59
16 SAIFIChart
Item #5. Page 16
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 60
17 Item #5. Page 17
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 61
18 Capital Improvements Map
The capital improvement map has transitioned to a virtual format via SCE Capital Improvements and can be accessed using the link provided or sce.com/CapitalImprovements.

Previous version
Item #5. Page 18
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 62
19 Glendora Capital Improvements Map
*As of January 10, 2023
Item #5. Page 19
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 63
20 Helpful Information
SCE Outage Center
• Report an Outage: Call 800-611-1911 or report
online at https://www.sce.com/outagecenter/report-an-outage • Check Outage Status on Power Outage Awareness
Map: https://www.sce.com/outage-center/checkoutage-status SCE Notifications
• Sign up for outage alerts: sce.com/outagealerts
• Sign up for PSPS alerts: sce.com/pspsalerts
• Sign up for the Energized by Edison Newsletter:
energized.edison.com/newsletter
Situational Awareness
• PSPS maps and information: sce.com/psps
• Wildfire cameras: alertwildfire.org
• Weather stations: sce.com/weatherstations
Vegetation Management
• Vegetation Management: sce.com/safety/powerlines;
contact 800-655-4555 or [email protected]
Customer Programs & Rebates
• SCE Customer Programs & Resources:
sce.com/customerresources
• SCE Marketplace (rebates and programs):
marketplace.sce.com
• SCE Medical Baseline Program:
sce.com/medicalbaseline
• Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP):
sce.com/sgip or selfgenca.com
• SCE Customer Support: 800-655-4555
SCE Wildfire Webpage – sce.com/wildfire
Preparedness
SCE emergency preparedness – sce.com/beprepared
CAL FIRE preparedness – readyforwildfire.org
Item #5. Page 20
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 64

THANK YOU
21 Item #5. Page 21
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 65

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS DATE: JANUARY 24, 2023
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT(S): 2
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72413; VARIANCE; AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR A PRIVATE GATED

DEVELOPMENT OF THIRTEEN NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, TWO

PRIVATE STREETS, A REMAINDER PARCEL DESIGNATED FOR OPEN SPACE, AND FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURES (PROJECT NO. PLN14-0024; APPLICANT:

DREAMLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC; LOCATION: 950 NORTH SILENT RANCH DRIVE)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council open and conduct the Public Hearing, accept evidence and testimony presented and in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary consider the following:

1. Adopt an Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,

2. Adopt a City Council resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72413, A VARIANCE, AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR THE GRAND ESTATES PROJECT LOCATED AT 950 NORTH SILENT RANCH DRIVE; AND CERTIFYING THE PROJECT’S INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PROJECT NO. PLN14-0024).”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The applicant (Dreamland Investments, LLC) is requesting that the City Council approve their “Grand Estates Project” (File No. PLN14-0024 - Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, Variance, Development Plan Review, CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) to allow subdivision of a 27-acre property located at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive. The southern 11 acres is slightly south sloping and with a moderate to flat grade over most of the site and will be developed for a gated residential neighborhood with 2 private streets (access from Palm Drive) and 13 new single-family residential home lots. The site’s existing single-family residential home will remain with access from Silent Ranch Road.

The northern 16 acres contains moderate to steep slopes and 3 existing dam structures, which have not been maintained nor function as intended. The northern 16 acres will be designated a remainder parcel and preserved as open space in perpetuity. The three dam structures will be removed and replaced with three new proposed flood/debris control basin facilities that are larger and will protect the new homes on the lower lot and provide protection for the existing neighboring homes to the south of the site.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
The Project site is generally undeveloped and vegetated. Existing structures and developments include a single-family residential home located in the southwestern portion of the site, remnant structures from previous activity on the site, and three flood dam structures.

Item #8. Page 1
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 66
Staff Report Page 2 of 4
Between the early 1900s through the 1970s, the site was associated with the Rancho Los Alisos and Camp Aventura. Around 1907, Charles Silent (lawyer, judge, and a real estate speculator in Los Angeles) began to develop the Rancho Los Alisos property as a landscaped park, with orchards, rancho-style housing with thatched roofing, fountains, and rock-lined paths. A portion of the Monrovia Tunnel No. 1 section of the 30-mile Upper Feeder Aqueduct, which is owned and operated by Metropolitan Water District (MWD), was constructed through the property in 1936. In 1968 and 1969, a fire and subsequent debris flow event prompted the construction of 37 crib dams to control flood debris flows. Three of these dams are on the project site. The dams were built by the US Forest Service and currently under jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Also on the site, the Camp Aventura Girl Scout Camp opened in 1955. The development of Camp Aventura cleared the site of orchards and four buildings, constructed 12 tent pads, and planted trees and other vegetation around the camp. The original Rancho Los Alisos-era ranch house and outbuildings were all demolished by 1968. The Girl Scout Camp was demolished in 1974 and a new residence was built at the former Ranch Los Alisos house site between 1976 and 1980.

In 2014, Dreamland Investments, LLC filed an application (Attachment D) for a Tentative Tract Map (No. 72413) and DPR for construction of a gated subdivision consisting of 15 fee simple lots including 2 private streets. The project site includes one existing single-family residence, 13 new single-family residential lots and a remainder parcel. A variance is required to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade. This project was analyzed and refined over an 8-year period due to site’s various constraints and regulatory requirements for development.

On November 24, 2022, a Notice of Public Hearing (Planning Commission) was published in the San Gabriel Valley Examiner and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. On December 6, 2022, the Glendora Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject application (Project Number: PLN14-0024). Written public comments received prior to the Planning Commission meeting are included as Attachment M. After discussion and public testimony, the Planning Commission public hearing concluded with a 5-0 vote recommending approval of the project to the City Council with additional recommendations that:
a. The in-lieu tree mitigation payment be calculated and apportioned among the 12 new homes by square footage of each new residential lot; and
b. The property owner shall conduct community outreach throughout the duration of the development.

On January 12, 2023, a Notice of Public Hearing (City Council) was published in the San Gabriel Valley Examiner and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property.

DISCUSSION
Project Location:

The project site (950 Silent Ranch) is approximately 27 acres in size and is an irregularly shaped hillside parcel, undeveloped except for a single-family residential home (built in 1976), remnant structures from previous uses on the site, and three flood dam structures, at the northern terminus of Grand Avenue in the City of Glendora. The site’s southern access is Palm Drive (just west of the terminus of Grand Avenue).

Item #8. Page 2
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 67
Staff Report Page 3 of 4
See the following vicinity map:

General Plan and Zoning Designation:

The subject property has a General Plan (Community Plan 2025) Land Use Designations of Low Density Residential (southern portion) and Conservation Open Space (northern portion) and zoning designations of Estate Residential (E-7 20,000) and Open Space Natural. Attachment B visually depicts the current General Plan designations at and around the site. Attachment C visually depicts the current Zoning designations at and around the site.

Note: Although the residential subdivision project is a permitted use, the proposal includes a request for a variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade for the required reconstruction of three debris basins in the open space area of the parcel.

Application/Project Request:

The project involves the following discretionary approvals:
 Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the site’s lower 11 acres into 14 fee simple lots and one remainder parcel.
 Variance to allow grading into the 35% slope area for the construction of an access road and rebuild the three existing flood control crib dams into more efficient debris basins.  Development Plan Review (DPR) required for the gated community and related hillside development; also related is a deferred payment request related to City’s Urban Forestry Manual tree replacement in lieu fee; and
 Environmental determination for the project (CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) The project application form is included in Attachment D.

Item #8. Page 3
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 68
Staff Report Page 4 of 4
Summary of Recommendation:

The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the project. For more information see the project analysis memo (Attachment E) and findings of fact supporting proposal see draft resolution (Attachment A).

FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant has paid all fees associated with the development application. Beyond the City’s review, if the residential homes are approved the project will provide one time revenue to the City in the form of building permit and development impact fees. In the long term, development of the property would also provide increased property taxes. The analysis memo (Attachment E) includes discussion regarding the requested City in-lieu fee deferment for tree replacement.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City of Glendora, as lead agency, is responsible for preparing environmental documentation in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to determine whether approval of the discretionary actions and subsequent development would have a significant impact on the environment.

With assistance from City’s environmental consultant for the project (Dudek), the City completed an Initial Study on the project in accordance with CEQA. The Draft Initial Study concluded that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with inclusion of mitigation measures, and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared.

After due notice was given as required by law, the Draft IS/MND was available for public review on June 30, 2022 and concluded on July 29, 2022. The Notice of Intent and Draft IS/MND and Appendices are included with this report as Attachments I and J. The City received six (6) written correspondence comments regarding the Draft IS/MND. The Comment letters received are included as Attachment K and the City’s written response to the submitted comments are included as Attachment L.

The project applicant has agreed to the required CEQA mitigation measures, which are imposed on the proposed project. A more detailed description of the project’s CEQA is include with the Project Analysis Memo (Attachment E) and project CEQA related documents are included as Attachments I – J.

Prepared By Mark Carnahan, City Planner
Concurs With Paulette Koss, Planning Commission
Reviewed By Jeff Kugel, Community Development Director
Certified to Availability of Funds Marie Ricci, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Approved By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CEQA Review Jeff Kugel, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

A. Draft Resolution
B. General Plan Designation Visual
C. Zoning Designation Visual
D. Project Vicinity Map
E. Project Analysis Memo
F. Proposed Plans
G. Public Hearing Notice – City Council
H. PowerPoint Presentation
I. CEQA - Notice of Intent
J. CEQA - Draft IS/MND
K. CEQA - Draft IS/MND Comment letters
L. CEQA - Written Responses to Comments
M. Planning Commission – Written Public Comments
Item #8. Page 4
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 69
RESOLUTION NO. CC 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 72413, A VARIANCE, AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
REVIEW FOR THE GRAND ESTATES PROJECT LOCATED AT 950
NORTH SILENT RANCH DRIVE; AND CERTIFYING THE PROJECT’S

INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(PROJECT NO. PLN14-0024

THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Glendora, California

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the property at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive, Glendora, California, is located in an established residential neighborhood; and WHEREAS, Glendora Municipal Code (GMC) §21.02.040 establishes procedures for the review of a gated community, hillside development through Development Plan Review (DPR) application; and
WHEREAS, GMC §21.02.040 provides that the purpose of a DPR is to establish procedures “whereby development plans can be reviewed to ensure orderly development, aesthetic design, safe and harmonious placement and to:

1. Prevent or minimize adverse impacts on property in the vicinity;

2. Implement the general plan and applicable specific plans;

3. Protect the public health, safety and welfare;

4. Site structures and other improvements in a manner that is in harmony with the terrain and existing developments in the vicinity;

5. Encourage and promote energy-efficient design.” ; and WHEREAS, the project includes hillside development that requiring a Variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade; and WHEREAS, GMC §21.02.030 provides procedures for a variance because of special circumstances applying to a particular property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this title may deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Where such circumstances apply, state law empowers the city to grant variances from the strict application of this title as it applies to such properties; and
WHEREAS, GMC §21.02.040(G) provides that the reviewing body (in this case, the City Council) may impose such conditions as it deems necessary to ensure that the project will meet the development standards of the zone and the purpose and intent of the DPR and the purpose and intent of a Variance; and
WHEREAS, in 2014, Dreamland Investments, LLC filed an application (Project File No. PLN14-0024) for a Tentative Tract Map (No. 72413) and DPR for construction of a gated subdivision consisting of 14 fee simple lots including one lot for 2 private streets, one existing single-family residence and 12 new single-family residential lots plus remainder parcel, and a Item #8. Page 5
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 70
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 2 of 21
Variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade on certain property located at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive, Glendora, California; and WHEREAS, Dreamland Investments, LLC requested special consideration to defer the payment of the in-lieu fee for trees being removed and not replaced per the Urban Forest Manual requirements, until individual lots are sold as part of Tract No. 72413; and WHEREAS, the environmental review for the project’s DPR and TTM was processed in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was available for public review from June 30, 2022 to July 29, 2022; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held for the Grand Estates Project by the Planning Commission of the City of Glendora, on December 6, 2022, after due notice was given as required by law, at which time oral and documentary evidence was introduced along with the written recommendation of the Planning Division staff of the City of Glendora; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval for the Grand Estates Project (File No. PLN14-0024) and its related requests (Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, Variance, and Development Plan Review); and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council of the City of Glendora, on ______, 2023, after due notice was given as required by law, at which time oral and documentary evidence was introduced along with the written recommendation of the Planning Commission of the City of Glendora; and
WHEREAS, on ______, 2023, the City Council, based on the evidence in the record, adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) its Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) (that is included as an Appendix to the Final IS/MND) and findings that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that potential impacts of the development project shall be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study pursuant to CEQA.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby makes Findings with Facts, which are hereby incorporated in full as follows:

FINDINGS FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW

1. The use is authorized pursuant to this title.

FACT: Gated Communities and Hillside Development projects are authorized with approval of a Development Plan Review (DPR) pursuant to Glendora Municipal Code §21.02.040.

Additionally, Pursuant to GMC§21.04.020(B)(8), a proposed development which will grade over 150 cubic yards on property over 10% slope requires approval through the DPR process.

Item #8. Page 6
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 71
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 3 of 21

2. The use is consistent with the General Plan and other applicable plans.

FACT: The property has a Glendora General Plan (“Community Plan 2025”) Land Use designation of Low Density Residential, and Conservation Open Space and a zoning district designation of Estate Residential (E-7 20,000) and Open Space Natural which is consistent with the General Plan and other applicable plans.

3. The site can accommodate the development standards of this title or as otherwise required.

FACT: The subject property located at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive consists of an irregularly shaped parcel totaling approximately 27 acres in size. The project includes a request for the subdivision of a hillside property for the development of a gated community consisting of 13 new single-family residential lots, one lot for two Private Streets, and one open space remainder parcel for a total of 14 new lots. One lot has an existing home that will remain in place and approximately 16 acres of the upper portion of the site will remain as open space dedicated in perpetuity for mitigation. The subject parcel is zoned Estate Residential (E-7) and Open Space Natural (OSN) with a General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density (20 dwelling units per acre). The proposed 13 residential lots meet all applicable development standards required of the E-7 zone with approval of a variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade.

4. The site is adequately served by streets, utilities and other services, facilities, and improvements.

FACT: The subject property fronts on W. Palm Drive with capacity to accommodate all traffic generated from the project. The traffic and intersection study both identified adequate roadways for a minimal increase in traffic volume. The subject property is adequately served with all necessary utilities including electric (Southern California Edison), gas (Southern California Gas Company), telephone (Verizon and others), sewer facilities (City and L.A. County Sanitation Districts), storm drain facilities (City and L.A. County Flood Control District), waste disposal (Athens Waste Disposal), Glendora Police Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department.

5. The development or improvements of the lot will not adversely affect the character and integrity of the area, the utility and value of properties in the area, and the health, safety, and welfare of the public.

FACT: The proposed project will result in 14 new lots with the site’s existing house remaining and construction of a new gated subdivision consisting of 12 fee-simple lots for new custom homes and one lot for two private streets in an established single-family estate residential neighborhood. The project is located between 950 North Silent Ranch Drive and the northern terminus of Grand Avenue and W. Palm Drive. The new lots are to the east of the existing single-family home. Approximately 16 acres of the upper portion of the site will remain as open space dedicated in perpetuity. The project will not be visible to the community at large.

Visual intrusion to the immediately adjacent properties is mitigated through the IS/MND.

Regarding neighborhood compatibility, there are two gated communities adjacent to the project on both the east and west sides of the property. The properties immediately adjacent to the west and south of the project are similar in size and are also zoned E-7. Additionally, Item #8. Page 7
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 72
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 4 of 21
the surrounding area is an established residential neighborhood. Therefore, the proposed housing project is compatible with the neighborhood. The development of the property will not adversely affect the character and integrity of the area, or the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The demolition of three existing flood control crib dams and construction of three flood control debris basins would be under current standards to provide effective protection from potential debris flows and flooding from the hillside areas to the north for the project and properties to the south. The project will not cause any serious health, safety, or welfare problems in that its design and related construction will be performed per requirements of all applicable codes, including zoning and building.

FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in §65451 of the California Government Code.

FACT: Pursuant to §66473.5 of the California Government Code, the proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM #72413) together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the City of Glendora’s General Plan Land Use Element Designation of Low Density Residential. The proposed tentative tract map is for 13 fee simple residential lots, one lot for two private streets, and an open space remainder parcel that will provide housing ownership opportunities and hillside open space for the community. The project location is in general proximity to City employment areas, active and passive recreational opportunities, a variety of commercial areas, and multi-modal transportation routes.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

FACT: The project’s existing E-7 20,000 zone is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. The project will consist of a gated community of 12 new lots ranging in size from 20,000 to 32,000 square feet and with an existing home to be on a separate 86,000 square feet lot, all of which being consistent with the E-7 zone. Approximately 16 acres of the upper portion of the site will remain as open space dedicated in perpetuity. The demolition of three existing flood control crib dams and construction of three flood control debris basins would be under current standards to provide effective protection from potential debris flows and flooding from the hillside areas to the north.

The development project complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's General Plan – Land Use, Housing, and Noise Elements. The development of the site with custom homes is consistent with the character and integrity of the residential neighborhood as the immediate area consists of gated communities with similar densities.

Land Use Element Goals
 LU-1: Balanced open space, residential and commercial development Citywide;  LU-7: A Diverse Range of Housing Choices;
 LU-10: Quality Infill Development;
 LU-18: Compatibility of Adjacent Uses; and
 LU-21: Preservation of Neighborhood Character.

The development project will use the latest energy conservation features to conserve natural resources and lower energy costs. The development project complies with the General Plan Land Item #8. Page 8
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 73
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 5 of 21
Use Designation and zoning ordinance standards with approval of a variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and can accommodate the development standards of this title or as is otherwise required.

FACT: The site is designed to be graded to be physically suitable for construction of a gated subdivision consisting of 14 fee simple lots including one lot for 2 private streets, one lot for the existing single family residence (950 N. Silent Ranch) and 12 new single-family residential lots plus a remainder parcel. The project site has frontage on W. Palm Drive, which provides access and connections to existing public utilities. A private drive and walkway provide adequate vehicular (including Fire Department equipment access) and pedestrian access throughout the site. The Fire Department has reviewed and accepted the site layout. The project is conditionally approved on implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in the IS/MND to reduce potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level. Specifically, the mitigation measures address aesthetics, biological resources, geology and soils, noise, utilities and service systems, agriculture and forestry resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, tribal cultural resources, and mandatory findings of significance.

4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

FACT: The subject site is located within a hillside residential neighborhood and contains a 16 acre open space component. The site contains three flood control crib dams which are filled with dirt and debris, no longer functioning as intended to provide flood protection. The construction of the three new flood control debris basins and the access road to allow construction and maintenance would be under current standards to provide effective protection from potential debris flows and flooding from the hillside areas to the north. The 14 lot residential subdivision is considered an infill project. Environmental review was conducted pursuant to CEQA and concluded that the project with implementation of mitigation measures will have no significant environmental impact. Specifically, the mitigation measures address aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources geology and soils, noise, transportation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and services systems, and mandatory findings of significance.

5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health, safety, or welfare problems.

FACT: The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not result in public health, safety, and welfare problems. The construction of the three new flood control debris basins and the access road to allow construction and maintenance would be under current standards to provide effective protection from potential debris flows and flooding from the hillside areas to the north would improve and protect downslope properties. The subdivision design complies with Los Angeles County Fire Department emergency vehicle access requirements. The project would be conditionally approved on implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in the IS/MND to reduce potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level. Specifically, the mitigation measures address aesthetics, biological resources, geology and soils, noise, utilities and service systems, agriculture and forestry resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, tribal cultural resources, and mandatory findings of significance.

Item #8. Page 9
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 74
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 6 of 21

6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

FACT: The subdivision will not conflict with any public easements. Any existing easements that are no longer needed will be abandoned through the subdivision process, and new easements will be recorded as necessary for public utilities, drainage, and other issues. The site contains existing easements of MWD, SCE, SoCalGas, General Telephone Company of California, and LACFCD. The MWD, SCE, SoCalGas, and General Telephone Company of California easements would remain as-is with project implementation.

The three existing LACFCD easements for Flood Control Purposes encompass three flood control crib dams , and the concrete drainage channel that traverses southerly through the eastern portion of the site. The boundaries of the existing easements would be abandoned and a new LACFCD easement (Easement “2”) would be created to encompass the proposed expanded flood control debris basins and associated maintenance access road.

FINDINGS FOR VARIANCE

1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification.

FACT: The subject property is irregularly shaped hillside parcel; the northern 16 acres is zoned open space and will be designated as preserved open space in perpetuity, contains moderate to steep slopes with elevations ranging from 1,026 feet to 1,170 feet. This portion of the site contains 3 existing crib dams which have not been maintained as there is no maintenance access, and no longer function as intended. The remaining 11 acres is zoned E-7 20,000 and is slightly south sloping and with a moderate to flat grade over most of the site. LACDPW has requirements for erosion control structures and sediment retention structures, to reduce the amount of sediment leaving the Project site in stormwater runoff. The replacement of the existing crib dams with the construction of three new flood control debris basins upstream of the residential lots is a requirement of LACDPW for protection of water quality in that the structures would remove sediment from the runoff, and if rainfall is of sufficient magnitude to fill the basins, the stormwater that is discharged would be much less turbid than it is under existing conditions. The access road, which will also provide maintenance access, and three new debris basins are within the 35% slope area. Grading into the 35% slope area is required to construct the new, larger, and more efficient debris basins and access road which will both protect and allow the construction of new homes on the lower lot as well as existing homes and areas to the south of the site.

2. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated.

FACT: A special circumstance exists whereby the subject property is of irregular shape and contains irregular grading contours and includes three existing crib dams which must be replaced to become functional and protect any downstream structures. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon which other properties in the Item #8. Page 10
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 75
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 7 of 21
vicinity and zone in which the property is located as the limitations are characteristics of the site and have not been created by any action of the applicant but are primarily caused by the existing irregular contoured slope of the land, the lack of maintenance of the three existing crib dams, and the natural debris and erosion of the site and surrounding hillsides.

LACDPW has requirements for erosion control structures and sediment retention structures, to reduce the amount of sediment leaving the Project site in stormwater runoff. As part of the proposed Project, debris containment would be provided via three proposed elevated inlets and debris basins. The maintained debris basins would serve as an additional buffer of defensible space between the residential lots and the hillsides to the north of the Project site. The introduction of larger flood control facilities onto the Project site would not exacerbate fire risks, but rather would provide additional defensible space due to the ongoing maintenance of the facilities, which requires periodic mowing and removal of accumulated vegetation within the structures and construction of an new access road for the construction and maintenance.

3. The variance will not adversely affect the character and integrity of the area, the utility and value of properties in the area, and the health, safety, and welfare of the public.

FACT: No other developed properties in the area have or have had any crib dams on the site. The construction of three new flood control debris basins upstream of the residential lots is necessary to replace the crib dams which have not been maintained and are not functioning. The debris basins will protect water quality in that the structures would remove sediment from the runoff, and if rainfall is of sufficient magnitude to fill the basins, the stormwater that is discharged would be much less turbid than it is under existing and it will be an enhancement to the area by displacing the runoff and protecting any structures downstream of the project from excessive rainwater runoff and debris flow. The maintained debris basins would serve as an additional buffer of defensible space between the residential lots and the hillsides to the north of the Project site. The introduction of larger flood control facilities and a maintenance access road onto the Project site would not exacerbate fire risks, but rather would provide additional defensible space due to the ongoing maintenance of the facilities, which requires periodic mowing and removal of accumulated vegetation within the structures. Therefore, the variance will allow for the construction of the new access road and debris basins which protect the residences and as such will have no negative effect on the public health, safety, or welfare of the public.

4. The variance will be consistent with the general plan and other applicable plans.

FACT: The granting of a variance will allow for the construction of a gated subdivision consisting of 14 fee simple lots including one lot for 2 private streets, one existing single-family residence and 12 new single-family residential lots and a remainder parcel. The property has a Glendora General Plan (“Community Plan 2025”) Land Use designation of Low Density Residential, and Conservation Open Space and a zoning district designation of Estate Residential (E-7 20,000) and Open Space Natural which is consistent with the General Plan and other applicable plans with approval of the variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade.

This project is consistent with the General Plan designation.

5. The variance will not authorize a use that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the property.

Item #8. Page 11
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 76
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 8 of 21
FACT: The applicant is requesting the approval of a Development Plan Review and Variance for the construction of a gated subdivision consisting of 14 fee simple lots including one lot for 2 private streets, one lot for the existing single-family residence and 12 new single-family residential lots and a remainder parcel. The property has a Glendora General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential, and Conservation Open Space and a zoning district designation of Estate Residential (E-7 20,000) and Open Space Natural. The construction of the gated community as described with the approval of the variance, is a permitted use. Therefore, the variance will not authorize a use that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the property.

SECTION 3. The City Council is concurrently adopting or has adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves a Development Plan Review, Variance, Deferred Payment Option and Tentative Tract Map for construction of a new subdivision consisting of 14 fee simple lots including one lot for 2 private streets, one lot for the existing single-family residence and 12 new single-family residential lots and a remainder parcel in a gated community as described by the report and depicted on project plans attached to the City Council Agenda Report for File No. PLN14-0024, and after determining that the project meets the requirements of GMC §21.02.040 and the California Subdivision Map Act, subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. The applicant shall submit a signed statement to the Planning Division indicating agreement with and acceptance of the adopted Conditions of Approval prior to issuance of permits and/or commencement of use.

2. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures as indicated in the IS/MND Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the project pursuant to CEQA requirements.

3. The Conditions of Approval shall be incorporated as a full-sized sheet in the submitted grading and building plans as part of the plan check process.

4. The subject property shall be developed in substantial conformance with project plans attached to the City Council Agenda Report for File No. PLN14-0024, as modified by these Conditions of Approval.

5. The City shall have the right of entry to inspect the premises to verify compliance with the Conditions of Approval and the Glendora Municipal Code.

6. The City shall retain the right and the jurisdiction to review the Development Plan Review (PLN14-0024) in the event the use conducted herein is modified, changed in scope, or the owner or operator seeks to expand, alter, reconfigure, or change the use.

This reservation of the right of review is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City to review and revoke the “Development Plan Review (PLN14-0024)” or to modify the permit for any violation of the Conditions imposed.

Item #8. Page 12
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 77
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 9 of 21

7. The applicant agrees as a condition of issuance of this entitlement to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes or action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorney’s fees and disbursements (collectively, “Claims”) arising out of or in any way relating to the issuance of this entitlement, any actions taken by the City related to this entitlement or the environmental review conducted under the CEQA, Public Resources Code §21000 et seq., for this entitlement and related actions.

8. Applicant shall, in the event of any filing of a judicial challenge to the Project upon final City approval, execute a “Reimbursement Agreement” in the format substantially utilized by City for purposes of coordinating a trust, deposit, and reimbursement system for the coverage of all City costs that may be incurred in Project litigation. A minimum deposit of $30,000 may be drawn-down upon as fees are incurred to the replenishment amount of $5,000. Each time the minimum amount of $5,000 is reached an additional $10,000 will be deposited on a continuing basis throughout proceedings.

9. Prior to Final Map the applicant shall pay for any remaining outstanding City fees/costs related to the processing of the project’s entitlements and CEQA.

10. At least one month before the proposed start of construction or construction-related activity on the subject property including, but not limited to, clearing, demolition, grading, or the delivery of soils, equipment, or materials, the applicant shall schedule and hold a pre-construction meeting. The applicant shall provide notice of the preconstruction meeting to the Planning Division and all owners and residents of properties within 500 feet of the subject property and all owners and residents of properties adjacent to any right-of-way to be used for the regular movement and/or delivery of equipment, materials, and soils to and/or from the site. The notices shall be delivered to addresses as shown on the latest Los Angeles County Tax Assessor’s Role and/or postal addresses at least 10 days before the proposed meeting date. The meeting shall be held in a convenient and ADA accessible location within two miles of the subject property or at City Hall during normal business hours (or alternatively as a zoom meeting). Any continued, canceled, or subsequent meetings shall also be noticed in the manner described above. The preconstruction meeting shall provide property owners and residents with descriptions of and estimated schedules for construction, pre-construction, and construction-related activities. The applicant shall schedule subsequent meetings, noticed in the manner described above; if there will be any substantial deviation from the description of activities or the estimated schedules. The applicant shall provide the Planning Division with certification or proof of delivery of the notices and a copy of the radius maps prior to issuance of permits.

11. The applicant shall submit a map detailing the route to be followed by vehicles making deliveries of equipment, materials, and soils to and from the site to the Planning Division and Engineering Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits.

12. Prior to the start of construction activities. Fencing shall be installed between the proposed construction areas and adjacent residences.

Item #8. Page 13
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 78
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 10 of 21

13. Off-site temporary construction easements may also be requested. Off-site improvements and construction within existing sidewalks shall include reconstruction of these sidewalks, once storm drain improvements are completed.

14. Submit to City for names for the two new private streets and address assignments for each individual new lot, prior to Final Map approval. As part of this review the applicant shall explore with City staff possibility of using names with historic context to the site, such as “Los Alisos” and “Aventura”.

15. Prior to Final Map approval the applicant shall demonstrate compliance (final design layout and related material requirements) for the private street entry/exit gates fronting Palm Drive; including all applicable requirements of Glendora Municipal Code §9.54 and §21.04.010D9. Approvals from LACFD and Glendora Police Department will be required.

16. Prior to Final Map approval the applicant shall determine if Lot 14 will be having its private driveway entrance location on Lot 13 (via an easement) and if so, demonstrate this on Final Map.

17. Prior to Final Map approval the applicant shall provide a wall and fence plan for review and approval by City (Planning Division, Engineering Division, and Building Division).

18. Prior to grading permit issuance, the LACFD and Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall have reviewed and approved any/all items related to their onsite infrastructure and easements.

19. The 16 acres of upper portion of the site (designated remainder parcel) shall remain and be dedicated as open space in perpetuity (except for allowed utility and flood control related infrastructure/facilities.

20. The Homeowner’s Association (HOA) will be established upon the occupancy of the first custom home. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) of the HOA must be approved prior to issuance of a grading permit so that all hydroseeding, watering, maintenance of the HOA areas and the habitat restoration areas; additional mitigation requirements; and other conditions or approvals would be established prior to construction of the proposed Project.

21. The applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the development including articles establishing a homeowner’s association (HOA). A copy of the draft CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Planning Division and City Attorney for review prior to Final Map approval. The applicant will be responsible for payment to cover all City staff and City Attorney time required to review said CC&Rs. A recorded copy of the approved CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of a grading permit as well as final payment to cover any City costs for review.

CC&Rs shall include the following requirements:
• The HOA shall maintain any/all common areas including private street trees and driveways, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, project entryway gates and walls/fences, irrigation, fixtures, drainage facilities, low impact development features, and other improvements.

Item #8. Page 14
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 79
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 11 of 21
• The HOA shall maintain all common landscaped areas. All landscaping bordering the driveway intersections shall be maintained below three feet in height to provide a clear line of sight for the drivers and pedestrians.
• The HOA shall provide all water needed for irrigation of the common landscaped areas and for any landscaping and trees in the public right-of-way fronting the project, along West Palm Drive.
• The HOA shall maintain landscaping in the public right-of-way, including trees, irrigation and any associated lighting fronting the property boundaries along West Palm Drive.
• The HOA shall maintain all landscape (including trees) within the designated remainder parcel.
• The HOA shall maintain required landscaping coverage in all graded areas prior to construction of the individual custom homes to prevent erosion and meet grading best practices and mitigation requirements.
• The CC&Rs shall clearly identify site maintenance responsibilities. • The CC&Rs shall specify that the parking and/or storage of recreational vehicles, boats, trailers (recreational or business-related) equipment, and similar such vehicles, is prohibited on the private streets.
• The CC&Rs shall require that residents use their garages and driveways to park their vehicles and not for long-term storage.
• The CC&Rs shall limit vehicle parking within any of the private on-street (and within designated easements) parallel parking spaces within for use by guests (noresidents and visitors) only. These spaces should be identified as guest parking and have a time limit to their use.
• Maintenance requirements of property owners for the individual custom lots while they are vacant and awaiting their individual future development. • The CC&Rs shall include a requirement that each custom home lot’s landscaping is required to plant trees equal to their share of the tree replacement requirement or pay an equal percentage of the tree replacement requirement per the agreement approved by the City Council. The tree selection and or in-lieu fee shall be approved by the City Arborist.
• The CC&Rs shall not be amended without the written consent of the City of Glendora Community Development Director.

Landscaping

22. Prior to the issuance of grading permit for the private streets and common areas the applicant shall complete a final landscape plan that includes the following:
 A Water Efficient Landscaping Application and MWELO compliance, which shall be completed and submitted to the Planning Division (for City reviews by Planning Division for landscape, City Arborist for trees and the Water Division for irrigation) for review and approval. The plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and shall demonstrate compliance with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Assembly Bill 1881). Approved landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to final inspection of Developer’s common area. (GMC §21.03.060)
 All common HOA maintained area landscaping and trees.  Any/all private lot maintained landscaping and trees which are being installed by developer as identified on the conceptual landscape plans.  Lighting for safety along entryways and walkways and along private streets.

Item #8. Page 15
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 80
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 12 of 21
 Designated remainder parcel landscaping.
 Habitat restoration areas (related to CEQA compliance – state approval).

23. Provide updated information regarding existing trees to be removed (location, tree type, size, general health) and the trees proposed as replacements and/or the payment of an inlieu fee to cover the cost of trees to be removed per the agreement approved by City Council.

24. All tree in-lieu fees (as required) shall be assessed by the City Public Works Department and paid by applicant or each individual custom home lot purchaser prior to the issuance of building permits. Replacement trees shall be based on the City of Glendora Urban Forestry Manual and information shall be presented as part of the final landscape design plans. Trees to be replaced within custom lots on pad areas will be identified at the time of each custom home application and required per the agreement approved by the City Council.

25. The applicant shall comply with tree plantings within jobsite to include the replacement of oak species with other oak species to ensure that native species are replenished. Other native species to replace oak species shall be approved prior. Coordination on this requirement shall be made with the City Forester.

26. The applicant shall comply with any tree plantings within the City’s right-of-way parkway area as determined by the Public Works Department during construction plan check for feasibility, selection of number, location, and type. Also, the applicant must abide by the final determination of the City Arborist on HOA maintained trees.

27. All common area landscaping shall be installed by the developer and maintained by the HOA.

Public Works (PW) Department - Final Tract Map/Site Development:

28. Conceptual approval of the project has been obtained from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for work within its easement. After approval of the tentative map and during the plan check phase, the applicant shall submit the applicable project plans and reports to MWD for final approval/permitting.

29. Conceptual approval of the project by L.A. County Flood Control District/Department of Public Works (L.A. County) for the proposed debris basins, drainage facilities, and work within its easements has been obtained by the developer. After approval of the tentative map and during the plan check phase, the applicant shall submit the applicable project plans and reports to L.A. County Flood Control for final approval/permitting. The proposed drainage facilities will be processed as a Miscellaneous Transfer Drain with the developer constructing the facilities to County standards, accepted by the City, and then transferred to L.A. County for operation and maintenance.

30. A final tract map is required and shall be submitted for first review at time of first submittal of the engineering plan check. The final map will be reviewed for technical accuracy by the city’s contract Land Surveyor. Developer is responsible for all such costs. A title report less than 6 months old is required at the time of submittal. Include copies of all underlying Item #8. Page 16
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 81
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 13 of 21
documents/easements of record referenced in the title report. Show all easements on the property on the grading plan. Label, dimension and identify.

31. An Indemnity Agreement and a Subdivision Improvement Agreement must be signed by the developer prior to final map approval. The developer will submit the final map to the City’s contract Land Surveyor for technical review. The Developer is responsible for all fees associated with this review, prior to the approval of the tentative tract map.

32. Driveway widths and radii will be reviewed and approved by L.A. County Fire Department for accessibility.

PW - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES):

33. This project is required to comply with the new NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) requirements. Projects subject to the MS4 are to implement postconstruction low impact development (LID) storm water runoff water quality control measures as a way to reduce downstream runoff. Follow Section 21.03.090 of Glendora Municipal Code to determine Applicability and Performance Criteria. Follow LA County LID Standards Manual for design and format of LID Report/LID Plan.

34. This project is required to comply with the State Construction NPDES permit. This requires a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for implementation during the construction phase of the project. Coverage under the State Permit and a State WDID number shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The SWPPP must be prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). The approved SWPPP must be implemented by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) during construction. Detailed plans for erosion control must be included.

PW - Grading and Drainage

35. Final grading and drainage plans and required supporting documents (such as geotechnical, drainage/hydrology/LID reports/plans) shall be submitted with the first engineering plan check and must comply with any recommendations of the geotechnical engineer of record and will be submitted and reviewed according to the City’s Grading Plan to the Public Works Department. A permit from the City of Glendora Public Works Department and a grading bond will be required prior to the start of construction. Show all existing and proposed easements on the improvement plans. Label, dimension and identify easement holders.

36. All structural BMP’s for the project must be shown in detail on the grading plan. During plan check and prior to the grading plan approval by the City, the grading plan will need to be reviewed/approved by the soils engineer. A minimum ½” per hour percolation rate must be verified by the soils engineer for the project via a percolation test and included in next submittal for any areas where storm water is proposed to be infiltrated.

37. Glendora Municipal Code (GMC) 20.28.010 requires developers to underground utilities in new developments. All existing overhead utilities along the project frontage of the public streets and alley shall be relocated underground. Coordinate with utility agencies as necessary.

Item #8. Page 17
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 82
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 14 of 21

38. A final geotechnical report is required to submitted with the first engineering plan check, addressing over-excavation. While the City does require reports be prepared following the LA County GMED manual, we have not adopted their building code. First submittal of Grading Plan should be signed and stamped by the geotechnical engineer stating that the Grading Plan is in conformance to the geotechnical/soil engineer recommendations. After final grading plan approval, the grading plan Mylar will also be wet signed and stamped by the geotechnical engineer. As necessary, provide an updated letter if the soils report is greater than one year old. The geotechnical report for this project may be peer reviewed by LA County GMED or the City’s contract geotechnical engineer/geologist. The developer is responsible for all costs. A $5,000 deposit is required to cover review of the geotechnical report.

39. A Grading Plan is required for the development including the new debris basins. Storm Drain Plans with profiles and details of the proposed drains, inlets, and facilities are required. All reports and plans required by the County must be submitted to the City and L.A. County for plan check and permitting at the same time as the first engineering plan check with the City.

40. Street Improvement Plans showing the proposed private street profiles, cross sections, and plans for the proposed private streets are required and shall be submitted with the first engineering plan check.

41. All structural BMP’s for the project must be shown in detail on the grading plan. The grading plan will need to be reviewed/approved by the soils engineer during plan check and prior to the grading plan approval by the City. A minimum ½” per hour percolation rate must be verified by the soils engineer for the project via a percolation test and included in next submittal for any areas where storm water is proposed to be infiltrated.

42. A final drainage study, including hydrology and hydraulics analyses, must be prepared and submitted for review at the time of first engineering plan check. The final report must follow the City’s Hydrology & Hydraulics report format and discuss the offsite stormwater run-on flows from properties surrounding the site. The report should analyze both off site storm water run-on and on site storm water flow.

43. When grading plans are submitted for first engineering plan check, a plan check fee is required and will be collected based on the cubic yards of earth moved based on the grading quantity on the submittal. Include over excavation and re-compaction quantity in calculation of the cut and fill quantities. At the time of issuing grading permit, final plan check fees will be adjusted accordingly with additional fees paid or refunded determined by final yardage. Grading Bond will be required prior to issuance of a grading permit.

PW - Water/Fire Service:

44. A Water Supply Report by Stetson Engineers (dated October 17, 2019) has been prepared for the project which details improvements required to provide adequate water service to the projects. A Water Improvement Plan is required to be submitted with the first engineering plan check. The Developer’s Civil Engineer should meet with the City’s Water Item #8. Page 18
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 83
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 15 of 21
Division during the plan development phase to verify all requirements and City participation in cost sharing.

45. Water is served by the City of Glendora. Frontage fees may apply to this project. Developer may be required to replace all the existing water lines fronting the Project and upsize existing water lines as necessary to meet requirements stipulated in the water model performed for the proposed development. Water improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance with City guidelines and submitted at the time of first engineering plan check.

After approval of the tentative tract map, contact the Water Division at (626) 914-8249 to determine water service requirements.

46. The owner/applicant may be required to provide water rights to serve the project. Currently water rights fees are approximately $14,000 per acre foot of water. When the final number of units and amount of landscaping is decided, during the plan check phase, contact the Water Division at (626) 914-8249 to begin the process of determining the water rights fee and to request a water will serve letter.

47. Exact service locations to be determined after the tentative tract map is approved, but they shall not be located in drainage features or where water could pond. Easements may be required to access the water meters and other water devices.

48. Backflow prevention shall be provided per City Standard Detail 2.30 for structural fire protection (i.e., sprinklers) and landscape irrigation systems. Plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and applicable plan check fees paid at the time of first engineering plan check.

49. Preparation of water improvement plans and reports by a registered civil engineer is required. The plans and reports shall be submitted at the time of first engineering plan check. A separate plan submittal will be required for all water mains and fire hydrants which will serve the site. That plan is a separate submittal to the Engineering Division as well as the L.A. County Fire Department for review and approval. The plan will be prepared using the City of Glendora title block and must show the connection in the public right of way and must have a signature block for the L.A. County Fire Department. Plan review fee of 5% of the engineer’s estimate is due at time of first submittal. For L.A.

County Fire Department requirements, please contact Fire Staff at (626) 963-5564.

50. If water easements or any other easements are required, they shall be shown on the final tract map. If separate documents are required for any easements, then follow City guidelines for preparing legal descriptions and plats). All separate document easements shall be submitted during the engineering plan check phase. The City uses a consultant land surveyor to perform the review of any documents stamped by a land surveyor which the developer is required to pay. The developer will be required to deposit $1,000 for the initial review of the document. Any unused funds are returned or if additional fees are required, an additional deposit will be requested.

51. Fire flow tests are required during the engineering plan check phase. Please contact the Public Works desk at (626) 914-8246 for scheduling the test. A fire flow information sheet dated 02/09/2018 was included with the preliminary project submittal.

Item #8. Page 19
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 84
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 16 of 21
PW - Sanitary Sewer

52. The City of Glendora owns the sewer collection system, but it is operated and maintained for the City as part of the County’s Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District. The plan check process for any sewer improvement plans will go through both the City of Glendora and Los Angeles County Public Works.

53. The treatment system for Glendora’s sewer is owned and operated by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 22. Prior to approval of the sewer improvement plan for the project, the developer’s Civil Engineer will need to contact the District to obtain a treatment will serve letter as well as pay the appropriate fees. For further information, please contact District Staff at (562) 908-4288l, extension 2717.

54. A Sewer Capacity Memorandum by Giron Engineers, Inc. (dated 03/26/2018 – updated 11/19/2019) to verify capacity in the existing downstream sewer system was prepared for this project. A Sewer Improvement Plan and Profile will be required for this project and shall be submitted with the first engineering plan check. Backwater valves may be required for the individual lot laterals. On-site sewer will be public sewer. Off-site sewer may require new or upgraded facilities. All public sewers require a city sewer improvement plan and profile. The plan check process will go through both the City of Glendora and Los Angeles County Public Works. Developer will be responsible for all the Plan Check fees for the City and the County. City’s plan review fee is 5% of the engineer’s estimate and is due at time of first submittal. Sewer acreage and frontage charges may be applicable and must be paid prior to the issuance of a permit for the construction of the mainline sewer for the project.

PW - Street Improvements

55. The project will require street improvement plans, and the plans shall be submitted during the first engineering plan check. The applicant’s Civil Engineer may download the City’s Street standards at: http://www.ci.glendora.ca.us/departments-services/publicworks/standard-designs-and-specifications. The owner/applicant is required to improve the portion of Grand Avenue and Palm Drive leading to the project. All paving must be shown on the street improvement plan for the project. Damaged or non-standard improvements and facilities must be reconstructed per City Standards. Additional new streetlights may be required.

56. A signing and striping plan must be prepared and submitted to the Public Works Department for review/approval with the street improvement plans.

57. Street improvements including grinding and overlaying the existing pavement; construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements; installation of new streetlights, signage, and striping. The limits of improvements are from the west side of the project frontage on Palm Avenue, along Palm Avenue in front of the project site, and south on Grand Avenue along the narrow section south of Palm Drive. Improvements should provide safe access through this area.

Item #8. Page 20
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 85
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 17 of 21

58. Any and all street improvements, utility, and trench work require a permit from the City of Glendora. All City Standards are available online at:
http://www.ci.glendora.ca.us/index.aspx?page=143

59. Construction temporary traffic control plans for Grand Avenue and Palm Avenue must be prepared and submitted to the Public Works Department for review/approval during the engineering plan check phase. The traffic control plan shall include flaggers, and control of construction traffic (multiple trucks) between the project construction entrance on Palm Drive and narrowed road section on Grand Avenue south of Palm Drive during multiple truck hauling operations for such work as clearing, rough grading, concrete construction, and street paving.

PW - Waste Management:

60. All construction, demolition, and renovation projects within the city with a total valuation cost for the new or remodeled construction as determined by the City Building Official which are, or projected to be, greater than or equal to one hundred thousand dollars shall submit a Waste Management Plan to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of any permits in compliance with the City’s Construction and Demolition Ordinance No. 1811. The approved Waste Management Plan shall be implemented upon start of demolition, grading, and construction and maintained throughout the project until issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The City may review and amend the plan as needed.

Guidelines are available from the recycling coordinator (GMC §6.09).

PW - Miscellaneous:

61. During the plan check process, the applicant will be required to apply for naming of the new private streets and formal address assignment. For details and fees, contact Public Works at (626) 914-8246.

62. The applicant shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City ordinances and resolutions, including the standard conditions applicable to division of land as established in Ordinance No. 1364. The subdivision shall be filed as one final map and shall be developed as one tract. Financial security shall be provided for all public improvements within the tract prior to final map approval.

Public Works – Parks Division

63. The grading plan shall show all trees currently on the project site. Each tree shall be labeled with its diameter at breast height (DBH), species, and “to be protected in place” or “to be removed.”

64. All landscaped areas and trees, including existing and new street trees, shall be provided with an automatic irrigation system with an approved backflow device. Parkway trees must have, Rain Bird, RWS (Root Watering System)-B-1401 with RWS sock and integrated collar and locking grate retainer. There should be three (3) RWS per tree, spaced evenly around the root ball or root mass. Irrigation systems for street trees and landscaped parkways shall be connected to the private common area irrigation systems and shall be maintained by the HOA.

Item #8. Page 21
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 86
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 18 of 21

65. All trees within the right-of-way shall be inspected and approved by City personnel prior to backfilling.

66. The applicant shall be responsible for replacing any new street tree that dies within one year after planting.

Safety

67. Address numbers/letters shall be clearly visible on each building and above the front door of each unit to facilitate emergency response to the satisfaction of the Police Department.

68. All pedestrian paths, parking areas, building perimeters, property perimeter, building entrances, and outdoor areas shall be adequately lit to the satisfaction of the Police Department.

69. Landscaping shall not interfere with either lighting distribution or walkways for safety purposes.

70. Landscaping shall not provide concealment places in the common areas.

71. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed, and installed to comply with all applicable fire and safety requirements.

72. An approved key box shall be provided, the location of which shall be determined by the City’s Public Works and Police Departments and LA County Fire Department.

Los Angeles County Fire Department
Fire Department - Access Requirements

73. Access as noted on the Tentative and the Exhibit Maps shall comply with Title 21 (County of Los Angeles Subdivision Code) and Section 503 of the Title 32 (County of Los Angeles Fire Code), which requires an all-weather access surface to be clear to sky.

74. The Private Street required for access throughout the development shall be indicated on the Final Map as “Private Driveway and Fire Lane” with the width clearly depicted.

75. A construction bond is required for the Private Street and Private Driveways within this development. Provide written verification of the posted construction bond to the Fire Department prior to Final Map clearance.

76. All proposed access roads within this development such as public streets, private driveways used as private streets, cul-de-sacs, and fire lanes shall be designed to comply with the City of Glendora, Public Works Department and the Fire Department standards.

Final Access Easement improvement plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to final approval by the Department of Public Works.

Item #8. Page 22
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 87
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 19 of 21

77. The proposed future buildings shall be placed such that a fire lane is provided to within 150 feet of all exterior walls of the first story. This measurement shall be by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Verification for compliance will be performed during the Fire Department review of the architecture plan prior to permit issuance.

78. Any on-site fire lane within each lot shall provide a minimum paved unobstructed width of 20 feet, clear to the sky. Verification for compliance will be performed during the Fire Department review of the architectural plan prior to building permit issuance.

79. Fire lanes exceeding a length of 150 feet that dead end are required to provide an approved fire Department turnaround. All required Fire Department turnarounds shall be designed to the Fire Department standards and shall be clearly depicted on the final design plans.

Verification for compliance will be performed during the Fire Department review of the architectural plan prior to building permit issuance.

80. The gradient of the private driveways shall not exceed 15 percent. Any changes in grade shall not exceed 10 percent within a 10 feet distance or 5.7 degrees. Cross slopes and required Fire Department turnarounds shall not exceed 2 percent grades. Verification for compliance will be performed during the Fire Department review of the architectural plan prior to building permit issuance.

81. Any change of direction within a private driveway shall provide a 32-foot centerline turning radius. Verification for compliance will be performed during the Fire Department review of the architectural plans prior to building permit issuance.

82. The private driveway required for fire apparatus access shall be posted with signs stating, “No Parking-Fire Lane” and/or stripped accordingly in compliance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code prior to occupancy.

83. The proposed private street within this development shall provide approved street names and signs. The proposed building shall provide approved address numbers. Compliance required prior to occupancy to the satisfaction of the City of Glendora, Department of Public Works, and the County of Los Angles Fire Code.

Fire Department - Water Requirements

84. All fire hydrants shall measure 6”x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal.

85. If the future single family dwelling is 3,601 square feet or greater, the required fire flow from the public fire hydrant for this development can be up to 4,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 4 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand. The required fire flow may be reduced by the Fire Prevention Engineering Section during the architectural plan review process prior to building permit issuance.

86. Install 4 new public fire hydrants.

Item #8. Page 23
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 88
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 20 of 21

87. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested, and accepted prior to construction.

88. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed building within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval prior to installation.

Fire Department - Final Map Requirements

89. Access as noted on the Tentative and Exhibit Maps shall comply with Title 21 (County of Los Angles Subdivision Code) and Section 503 of the Title 32 (County of Los Angles Fire Code), which requires an all-weather access surface to be clear to sky.

90. The Private Driveway proposed as private streets for access throughout the development shall be labeled as “Private Driveway” on the Final Map. The portion of the private driveway intended to fire apparatus access shall be identified as “Fire Lane” on the Final Map. All widths and dimensions shall be clearly delineated with a reciprocal access agreement is required for all private driveways. Compliance required prior to Final Map clearance.

91. A construction bond is required for all private driveways within this development. Provide written verification of the posted construction bond to the Fire Department prior to Final Map clearance.

92. Provide a complete gate detail prior to the clearance of the Final Map.

93. Fire hydrant improvements plans shall be submitted to our office for review prior clearance of the Final Map

94. Establish Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which grant the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County 9Fire District), or other agencies as agreed to by the Fire District.

Term

95. Construction shall commence within 24 months after the effective date of the approval, or such other period specified as a condition of approval and shall be carried on diligently to completion. If construction work is not commenced within the required time and carried on diligently to completion, the permit shall become void; however, the Planning Commission may extend the time limit in the case of unavoidable delay. The applicant must submit a written request to the Planning Commissions for a time extension at least thirty days before the original time limit expires. Consideration of a time extension does not require a public hearing even if a hearing was required for the original permit. (GMC §21.02.010 E)
Enforcement
Item #8. Page 24
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 89
Resolution CC 2023-___ Page 21 of 21

96. The property owner shall pay the costs of any code enforcement activities, including attorney’s fees, resulting from the violation of any conditions of approval or any provision of the Glendora Municipal Code. (GMC §1.18)

97. Any violation of the Zoning Ordinance or any entitlement granted is considered a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and/or by imprisonment in the County jail for a period not to exceed six (6) months. Each day or portion of a day during which any violation of the Zoning Ordinance occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense and shall be punishable as provided. (GMC §21.01.030 H.)
SECTION 5 . This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter the same in the Book of Original Resolutions.

APPROVED and PASSED this __ day of ________, 2023.

City Council of Glendora, California
BY: _______________________________

GARY BOYER
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
WILLIAM W. WYNDER
City Attorney

CERTIFICATION
I, Kathleen R. Sessman, City Clerk of the City of Glendora, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Glendora at a regular meeting held on the __ day of _________, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Dated: _________, 2023
_______________________________
KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN
City Clerk/Communications Director
Item #8. Page 25
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 90
Item #8. Page 26
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 91
Item #8. Page 27
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 92
Item #8. Page 28
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 93
Project Analysis Memorandum 1 | P a g e
PROJECT NO. PLN14-0024- PROJECT ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
PROJECT SUMMARY:

Application(s): Dreamland Investments, LLC (applicant) is seeking approval for the “Grand Estates Project,” a subdivision of a 27 acre property. The southern 11 acres is slightly south sloping and with a moderate to flat grade over most of the site and will be developed for a gated residential neighborhood of 12 new single-family residential home lots with 2 private streets (that take access from Palm Drive). The site’s existing single-family residential home (950 Silent Ranch Drive) will remain as a separate lot with separate access from Silent Ranch Drive. One remainder parcel of approximately 16 acres would also be designated for open space and within this area the project includes removal of three existing Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) structures, which would be redeveloped under current standards to provide effective protection from potential debris flows and flooding from the hillside areas to the north. One flood control access road would also be constructed and connected to the main proposed private street.

To accomplish the proposed development, the applicant has applied for the following:

1. Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the lower 11 acres into 14 fee simple lots and one upper 16 acre remainder parcel.

2. Development Plan Review (DPR) required for hillside development and for the Gated Community.

3. Variance to allow grading into the 35% slope area for the construction of an access road and three larger and more efficient debris basins.

4. Deferred Payment Option for the required Urban Forest Manual tree replacement in lieu fee until sale and development of the custom lots; and

5. Environmental determination for the project (CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) Approval of this determination is a prerequisite to each, and all other amendments and approvals listed above.

Applicant/ Property Owner: Dreamland Investments, LLC
950 North Silent Ranch Drive
Glendora, CA 91741
Project site Property Address: 950 North Silent Ranch Drive, Glendora, CA; L.A. County Assessor Identification No.: 8684-045-004
Description of Property Location and Current Use: The project site is approximately 27 acres in size and is located at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive, at the northern terminus of Grand Avenue in the City of Glendora. The project site is currently undeveloped, with the exception of a singlefamily residence, minor remnant structures from previous uses on the site, and three flood control/debris check dam structures.

Surrounding Uses: Adjacent to the site on the west is a gated community of single family residences, undeveloped hillside areas, and utility and flood control infrastructure, consisting of a concrete drainage system that leads out of the San Gabriel Mountains, the areas south (across Palm Drive) and southwest are developed with single-family residential neighborhoods. To the north of Item #8. Page 29
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 94
Project Analysis Memorandum 2 | P a g e
the project site are mountainous, undeveloped areas within the northern portion of the City and the Angeles National Forest. To the east are hillside areas that are sparsely developed with rural residences. The site is approximately one block to the east of the Church of The Open Door and St Lucy’s Priory High School is to the southwest.

General Plan Designation: The project site currently consists of one parcel, which has General Plan (Community Plan 2025) land use designations of Low Density Residential (for the southern portion) and Conservation Open Space (for the northern portion). Attachment B visually depicts the General Plan land use designations at and around the site.

The Low Density Residential designation is “intended for the transitional areas between hillside areas and higher density single-family residential areas. Low Density Residential allows for the development of single family residential on lots ranging from 10,500 to 30,000 square feet”.

The Conservation Open Space designation is intended: “to protect areas with high scenic value, environmental and habitat sensitivity, and passive recreational facilities. A large portion of this designation exists in the Angeles National Forest within the foothills. It is intended that future improvements or development activities in these areas would be limited to those activities that support the preservation of passive recreational activities, such as soft trails and other facilities that support passive recreational uses. Zoning districts compatible with the Parks and Open Space designation include OS-N (Open Space – Natural), and E-7 over 200,00 square feet.” The City’s General Plan has several goals and polices that should be considered with the proposal.

Staff found the following excerpts from the General Plan Housing and Land Use Elements to be relevant:

Housing 1 (Goal): Assure the quality, safety, and habitability of existing housing and the continued high quality of residential neighborhoods.

Housing 1.5: Preserve the unique environmental aspects of the community, including hillsides, canyons, and other environmental amenities.

Housing 3 (Goal): Provide suitable sites for housing development which can accommodate a range of housing by type, size, location, price, and tenure.

Housing 3.1: Implement land use policies that allow for a range of residential densities and products, including low-density single-family uses, moderate-density townhomes, and higher-density apartments, condominiums, and units in mixed-use development Housing 3.3: Encourage compatible residential development in areas with recyclable or underutilized land.

CON-1: Protection and conservation of Glendora’s water resources.

CON-4.3: Incorporate project-level storm water mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to water quality and ensure mitigation measures are adequately monitored.

CON-4.5: Protect the planning area from unnecessary storm water run-off from outside the planning area that would have the potential to require additional storm water conveyance or treatment facilities maintained by the City.

CON-4.6: Ensure new development and redevelopment projects adequately analyze potential impacts to the existing wastewater infrastructure system.

CON-4.7: Protect the planning area from the conveyance of wastewater from outside the planning area that would have the potential to require additional wastewater conveyance or treatment facilities
CON-8 (Goal): Proper conveyance and treatment of storm water and implementation of techniques to reduce pollutants consistent with Federal, State and regional regulations and standards.

Item #8. Page 30
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 95
Project Analysis Memorandum 3 | P a g e
CON-8.1: Ensure existing drainage facilities are properly maintained.

CON-8.2: Ensure all new development and redevelopment projects comply with Federal, State, regional and City regulations and ordinances related to storm water.

CON-8.3: Incorporate project-level storm water mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to water quality and ensure mitigation measures are adequately monitored.

CON-10.4: Ensure appropriate placement and proper maintenance of tree resources within the City.

LU-4.2: Provide for expanded infill residential opportunities in appropriately designated areas in the City.

LU-5 (Goal): Expanded residential development opportunities.

LU-5.2: Provide for expanded infill residential opportunities in appropriately designated areas in the City.

LU-7 (Goal): A diverse range of housing choices.

LU-7.1: Provide opportunities for the development of housing at a variety of affordability levels and densities that respond to the various needs of future residents.

LU-10 (Goal): Quality infill development.

LU-10.1: Ensure the design and development of infill projects compliments existing development in terms of scale, character, and pedestrian quality.

LU-18 (Goal): Compatibility of adjacent land uses.

LU18.1: Ensure the preservation of a scale and character of development is sensitive to adjoining uses.

OSR-3.3: Ensure development within the hillsides is consistent with preserving hillside integrity.

SAF-2.1: Require all proposed developments to prove that the development can adequately be served by fire flows.

SAF-2.2: Maintain low density/intensity land use designations in the hillside areas.

Zoning: The project site, has a zoning designation of Estate Residential (E-7:20,000) and Open Space – Natural (OSN). Attachment C visually depicts the zoning designations at and around the site.

The purpose of the Estate Residential (E-7:20,000) zone as stated in the GMC is “to protect and promote the unique single-family nature of the city by limiting the uses in such zones to residential and residentially compatible uses and by requiring standards for the use, maintenance and development of single-family residential zoned properties.” The purpose of the Open Space - Natural zone as stated in the GMC is “(1) conserve and manage natural resources which may include biological resources, watercourses, hills, canyons, major rock outcroppings, etc.; (2) protect the public health and safety by including areas requiring management due to hazardous or special conditions such as fire, flood and earthquake fault; and (3) provide outdoor recreation including areas of scenic, historic or cultural value.

The OSN zoning designation shall only be applied to public and quasi-public property; provided, however, that a private property owner may request and be considered for a change of zone to OSN”
The GMC further states that regarding permitted uses, “All property located in an OSN zone shall be left in its natural, wilderness state except for the following uses: riding and hiking trails, picnic and playground areas, flood control structures and facilities, and utility substations and related equipment and structures”.

Item #8. Page 31
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 96
Project Analysis Memorandum 4 | P a g e
PROJECT ANALYSIS:

Request – Variance
The applicant has requested a variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade in the open space area for the construction of the access road and the required larger and more efficient flood control debris basins. The project site is generally undeveloped and vegetated, except for a single-family residence located in the southwestern portion of the site, remnant structures from previous uses on the site, and three flood control crib dam structures in the upper remainder parcel. In 1968 and 1969, a fire and mudslide prompted the construction of LACFCD crib dams in the project site to control debris flows. Three main drainages are located within the project site, which are currently intercepted by the three flood control crib dam structures. However, due to accumulated sediment and lack of maintenance, these structures are not functioning to retain debris or flood flows.

The northern 16 acres of the project site which is zoned open space will be designated as a “building restriction area.” No habitable structures would be permitted except for the proposed flood control debris basins. The LACFCD determined that with implementation of the proposed Project, potential debris flows during rain events from the undeveloped hillside areas to the north of the site could not be adequately captured by the existing debris control structures, which are filled to capacity and no longer function as intended. Therefore, with implementation of the proposed Project, the existing three flood control crib dams would be removed, and larger flood control debris basins would be constructed within generally the same location. This would protect the new residential development as well as other homes and areas downslope from safety hazards associated with flooding and debris flow. The area where the new facilities and the access road need to be constructed is above the 35% natural grade. The grading will not create any health or safety issues and the new structures will be maintained by LACFCD.

Staff feels that the benefits to the area at large, which will be protected by these new flood control debris basins creates a beneficial need for the steep slope intrusion and warrants a variance. Staff recommends the approval of the variance to allow grading into steep slope areas exceeding 35% natural grade.

Per GMC §21.02.030 (Findings for Approval). The reviewing body shall grant a variance if the five required findings are made. These findings are detailed in the draft resolution (Attachment A).

Request – Tentative Tract Map (No. 72413)
As previously stated, the “Grand Estates” project site consists of one existing parcel. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel into 14 fee simple lots (consisting of 12 new single-family residential lots, one lot for an existing residence, and one lot for two private streets) plus one designated remainder parcel. It is expected that the 12 new single-family residential lots within the new gated community will be developed in the future, with custom homes, constructed by the individual lot owners, as the market will bear. The gated community subdivision would also include shared supporting community infrastructure and streetscape landscaping.

Item #8. Page 32
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 97
Project Analysis Memorandum 5 | P a g e
The table below shows the breakdown of the proposed lots within the tentative tract map (TTM):

Grand Estates Project (TTM 72413)
LOT # Lot Size (S.F.) Use
1 86,010 Residential Lot- Existing House (950 Silent Ranch Drive) 2 31,195 Residential Lot- Future House Site
3 21,552 Residential Lot- Future House Site
4 88,923 2 private streets – “A” & “B”, HOA maintained landscape area adjacent to streets, and Entry Gate
5 25,461 Residential Lot- Future House Site
6 32,005 Residential Lot- Future House Site
7 21,948 Residential Lot- Future House Site
8 29,121 Residential Lot- Future House Site
9 20,000 Residential Lot- Future House Site
10 20,898 Residential Lot- Future House Site
11 31,291 Residential Lot- Future House Site
12 24,645 Residential Lot- Future House Site
13 20,010 Residential Lot- Future House Site
14 20,014 Residential Lot- Future House Site
Designated
Remainder Parcel
703,828 Access Road, 3 new Flood Control Dams
Request – Development Plan Review
Per GMC §21.02.040 and §21.06.020, the proposed project would require the review and approval of a Development Plan Review to allow the hillside development and for the Gated Community.

The applicant is proposing to develop the site, which would include the grading and construction of the infrastructure, common area landscaping for the future development of 12 custom homes, and some additional landscaping on the lots in the designated fuel modification zones. Two private street drives would be built that take a single public access from W. Palm Drive (just west of the termination of Grand Avenue). Three flood control crib dams would also be removed and completely rebuilt. Currently, the property is vacant except for the existing single family home (950 N. Silent Ranch Drive) in the upper westerly part of the site, which has a separate access from Silent Ranch Drive. The developer intends to develop the entire southern 11 acres of the site, while the upper 16 acres (which is designated as a remainder parcel) will remain open space (except for the flood control related items). The proposed lots for the 12 new single-family residential homes will be developed in the future, with custom homes, constructed by the individual lot owners, and will be required to adhere to the zoning regulations at the time of each application.

The applicant will also be responsible for related items required by the project’s CEQA mitigation requirements, including any/all habitat restoration, and City Council approved project conditions of approval.

The proposed development plan and Tentative Parcel Map has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Their conditions of approval are included as part of the resolution.

Item #8. Page 33
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 98
Project Analysis Memorandum 6 | P a g e
Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, shows the proposed site development, including grading contour lines, easements, and proposed utility infrastructure. All utility infrastructure would be placed underground. Figure 2.4b, Cross-Sections of TTM No. 72413, shows the existing and proposed elevation changes associated with each cross-section on Figure 2-4a.

The topography of the site varies in elevation from 960 feet above mean sea level (amsl) to 1,170 feet amsl. The southern approximately 11 acres of the site, which would be developed with residential land uses, is slightly south sloping and has a moderate to flat grade. Elevations across the southern portion of the site range from 960 to 1,025 amsl. The northern approximately 16 acres, which are designated as preserved open space, contain moderate to steep slopes with elevations ranging from 1,026 feet to 1,170 feet amsl. The proposed project grading will remove portions of the existing slope. Per the project’s preliminary grading plan, the total cut is anticipated to be approximately 94,500 cubic yards, and the total fill is anticipated to be approximately 96,800 cubic yards, with 2,300 cubic yards of imported soils required. This includes 73,000 cubic yards of cut materials and 32,000 cubic yards of fill materials within the debris basin infrastructure hillside area, and 21,500 cubic yards of cut materials and 64,800 cubic yards of fill materials within the residential development area. Areas adjacent to the proposed debris basins may be subject to minimal grading/grooming to remove loose surface materials and reduce loose debris from running off into the debris basin facilities, as required by the LACFCD. Upon completion of the proposed Project, the affected slopes would be hydroseeded with native seeds to facilitate the reestablishment of vegetative cover (tree planting within area are also anticipated as shown on conceptual landscape plan). Part of the area within the debris basin infrastructure hillside area where the new facilities and the access road need to be constructed is above the 35% natural grade.

A conceptual landscape plan is included with the project plans (Attachment I) and indicates over 400 new trees (of various types) as well as shrubs, vines, and ground covers (of various types) will be planted (the final tree count will be determined prior to grading). Common area landscaping will be native and/or drought-tolerant plants including succulents and will be maintained by the HOA. Drip irrigation will be used throughout, which saves water consumption and excess water run-off. The individual yards will be homeowner installed and maintained per the CC&R’s.

Conditions of Approval include a requirement that the developer plan and install all landscaping, hydroseeding, watering, maintenance of the HOA areas and the habitat restoration areas on the project site and that the future HOA will maintain the installed landscaping, except for private areas of new homes which will be hydroseeded for erosion and mitigation purposes as required by the MND after grading.

A final landscaping plan is required that demonstrates the project complies with the California State Model Water Efficiency Ordinance (MWELO). To ensure compliance with applicable landscaping requirements, staff has included a condition of approval requiring that a landscape review application for the final common area landscape plan and MWELO compliance be submitted for review and approval by City staff prior to the issuance of grading permits.

Item #8. Page 34
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 99
Project Analysis Memorandum 7 | P a g e
Request – Deferred Payment Option (Tree Replacements – In-lieu fee) The applicant is requesting special consideration of an option to defer the payment of the City inlieu fees for the replacement of trees being removed during the grading of the project. The City of Glendora Urban Forestry Manual (UFM) provides guidelines and specifications for the pruning, planting, removal, and general care for city trees. The City considers the impact on private property trees as part of any application for discretionary zoning approval. In reviewing applications, the City Forester shall consider the impact on existing private trees and shall recommend project alternatives that encourage the preservation of mature trees. Trees that are removed from private property when done for the purpose of accommodating a project subject to discretionary zoning approval require replacement based on the schedule in the UFM. If the project applying for zoning approval does not replace trees on-site, an in-lieu fee per tree for future tree replacement shall be collected and deposited into a tree replacement fund. The in-lieu fee is based on City's cost to replant and is set by city resolution. Funds collected must be used within five years of receipt of funds or the project applicant will receive a refund. Current cost of the installation of new trees for the in-lieu fees is as follow: 24” box tree - $360, 36” box tree - $1,000, and 48” box tree - $1,950.

The current City requirement is broken down in the following section of the UFM below:

NEW DEVELOPMENT/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
The City of Glendora desires to maintain and further develop the local urban forest on public and private property. Consequently, the City shall consider the impact on private property trees as part of any application for discretionary zoning approval (i.e. Development Plan Review, CUP, etc.). In reviewing applications, the City Forester shall consider the impact on existing private trees and shall recommend project alternatives that encourage the preservation of mature trees. Trees that are removed from private property when done for the purpose of accommodating a project subject to discretionary zoning approval shall require replacement based on the following schedule.

Private Trees of any species removed with a DBH of 10 inches or more must be replaced according to the size scale listed below:

Existing DBH Replacement DBH or tree
10” -15” 24” boxed tree – 1:1 replacement
16” - 36” 36” boxed tree – 1:1 replacement
37” - 48” 48” boxed tree – 2:1 replacement
49” or greater Tree replacement to be determined by the City Forester Native Oak Trees are of particular importance to the community with respect to preservation. Mature Oaks on private property have a positive effect on property values and enhance the beauty of neighborhoods.

Consequently, any Oak removed from private property with a DBH of 8” or more shall require replacement according to the size scale below:

Existing DBH Replacement DBH or tree
8”-15” 36” boxed tree – 2:1 replacement
16”-36” 48” boxed tree – 3:1 replacement
37” or greater Tree replacement to be determined by the City Forester Multi-trunk trees, Oaks or other species, shall calculate the combined DBH of all trunk branches 4” DBH or greater. The replacement requirement shall be based on the tables above.

Item #8. Page 35
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 100
Project Analysis Memorandum 8 | P a g e
Tree replacement species shall require review and approval from the City Forester. Preservation of existing trees is preferred over replacement. If the project applying for zoning approval does not replace trees onsite, an in-lieu fee per tree for future tree replacement shall be collected and deposited into a tree replacement fund. The in-lieu fee is based on City’s cost to replant and set by city resolution. Funds collected must be used within five years of receipt of funds or the project applicant will receive a refund.

Many factors exist such as amounts of rainfall, fire, disease, health of trees, which impact the number of trees in a given area. Based on the latest tree survey of project property a total of 835 trees were identified onsite, however only 639 of which were considered “live trees” with a diameter breast height (DBH) of 8” or greater, and subject to the City’s UFM tree policy.

As preservation of existing trees is preferred over replacement, the developer revised the grading plan to leave as many of the existing trees in place as possible and it is estimated that a total of 184 live trees (over 8” DBH) can be retained. However due to the large number of trees on site, approximately 651 trees would be removed to allow for site development of which 455 qualify as live trees over 8” DBH and are subject to City policy which requires their replacement. Trees that are slated to be removed are listed in project plans landscape sheets L3 (Attachment F).

As set forth in the City’s UFM and GMC 20.08.130(6) [Preservation of Existing Trees], the Project would be required to plant (or submit payment of in-lieu fees) for replacement trees (estimated at approximately 879 based on current replacement ratios – see below table) to replace/compensate for the proposed tree removals.

Required Tree Replacements (based on latest tree survey and City’s Urban Forestry Manual Category Existing Tree Size Quantity of
Trees to be
Removed
Replacement Requirement Total
Required
Replacement
Trees
A Native 8” – 15” 168 36” box tree – 2:1 replacement 336 B Native 16” – 36” 104 48” box tree – 3:1 replacement 312 C Native 37” – 48” 9 48” box tree – 5:1 replacement 45
D Native 49” – 60” 0 48” box tree – 6:1 replacement 0
E Native 61” – and up 1 48” box tree – 7:1 replacement 7 F Other 10” – 15” 63 24” box tree – 1:1 replacement 63
G Other 16” – 36” 105 36” box tree – 1:1 replacement 105 H Other 37” – 48” 4 48” box tree – 2:1 replacement 8
I Other 49” – 60” 1 48” box tree – 3:1 replacement 3
J Other 61” – and up 0 48” box tree – 5:1 replacement 0 455 879
The project’s concept landscape plan currently identifies potential planting of approximately 443 replacement trees during the developer’s construction phase of the site development. Since the current number of 443 trees to be planted is less than the 879 tree replacement requirement, an inlieu fee is needed to compensate for the 436 trees not being planted during the construction phase. (Final numbers will be determined at the construction phase) The applicant is requesting that this in-leu fee be deferent until future lot development.

Item #8. Page 36
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 101
Project Analysis Memorandum 9 | P a g e
Based on the adopted UFM the in-lieu fee amount estimate is based on the following (and includes a developer’s commitment to plant approximately 443 trees):

Native Species Other Species
Tree Size 36" 48" 24" 36" 48"
Total required 187 179 19 51 0 446
Cost per tree $1,000 $1,950 $360 $1,000 $1,950
Total in-lieu fee $187,000 $349,050 $6,840 $51,000 $0 $593,890 The applicant is requesting the delayed in-lieu payment (current estimate up to $593,890) to be split 12 ways among the 12 custom homes owners as each lot is purchased and developed in the future. Each of the 12 in-lieu payment fees would be paid at the time of building permits for each custom home (along with other required construction related permit/impact fees) and be based on that future tree replacement rate. If the custom home lot builder can include any of the replacement requirements for any of the trees on the original list, then their share of the in-lieu fee would be reduced equivalently to the reduced tree replacement requirement.

Grand Estates is required to have a new tree survey performed prior to grading to update the onsite tree calculations based upon the conditions at the time. This report requires the approval of the City Arborist. The applicant has agreed to plant the trees in the slope areas shown on the conceptual landscape plans as revised on the final landscape plans which will determine the final number of trees being planted along with the remain in lieu fee requirement. Along with this updated survey and landscape plan, the final determined amount(s) shall than be split among the future lot owners after the sale of the individual custom lots. At the time of the application for each of the 12 individual custom homes, the cost of one twelfth of the in-lieu fee would be determined based on the current City fee schedule and would be due with the construction permit fees for each custom home. Should the custom lot homeowner plant any additional trees (approved by the city arborist LACFD and City WELO), the in-lieu fee would be reduced by the cost associated with the tree’s replacement value.

The actual individual amounts will be determined by reducing the requirement by the number of trees being installed on the site and calculating the new in-lieu fee based upon the current rates in the Urban Forestry Manual, approved by the City Arborist. The current amount would be approximately $49,490.83 per lot.

The applicant feels that since they are not developing the 12 custom home lots and cannot plant replacement trees in the custom home pad areas, they lose the ability to reduce the number of replacement trees required by exclusion of the pad area of each lot. Since there is no site plan for any of the custom lots, it would not be practical to try to plant trees which may then need to be removed for development of the home on the lot.

The City has never had a project with so many onsite trees (existing and removals) nor an in-lieu fee amount this high. As such, the request to pay the full amount by shifting payment from original developer to each individual lot’s homebuilder is unique and perhaps justified. Administratively Item #8. Page 37
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 102
Project Analysis Memorandum 10 | P a g e
City staff would be responsible for the ongoing tracking and accounting for this special in-lieu request. With proper City department/division coordination and recording it could be feasible.

Recommendation on Proposed Project:

Staff supports Planning Commission recommending Approval to the City Council for the “Grand Estates” project and its application requests (Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan Review and Variance). The project:
 meets necessary requirements and findings;
 will provide needed housing units to the city;
 helps flood and debris control for the site and surrounding neighborhood area. The replacement of the non-functioning crib dams will be beneficial to the areas south of the project. Much work has been done with LACFCD for approval of the reconstruction of the 3 new onsite flood control debris basins;
 has overcome several obstacles and has revised the project to lessen its environmental impacts and preserve as many of the existing trees as possible;  includes landscaping which is incorporated in common areas with street trees to create a residential streetscape feel;
 incorporates an aggressive tree replacement scenario, meeting as many of the requirements of the City’s Urban Forestry Manual as possible on-site (and a commitment to pay remaining tree replacement in-lieu fees in full);
 provides guest parking to accommodate additional parking needs along the private drive; and
 has reduced visual impacts by revising the heights of several originally proposed retaining walls.

Item #8. Page 38
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 103
Item #8. Page 39
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 104
Item #8. Page 40
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 105
Item #8. Page 41
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 106
Item #8. Page 42
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 107
GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL LOT 1(E) POOL HOUSE (E) RESIDENCE (E) GAZEBO (E) GUEST HOUSE LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 SHEET INDEX EXISTING TREES DATA (REMAIN) EXISTING TREES DATA (REMAIN) CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1 TITLE PLAN R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 0 NORTH 25' 50' 100' L-2.1 L-2.2 Phil May Landscape Architecture 2532 Wallace Ave. Fullerton, CA 92831 909-373-1959 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CONSULTANTS DREAMLAND INVESTMENT INVESTMENT LLC 626.236.7388 OWNER / DEVELOPER GIRON ENGINEERS INC. 654 S. GLENDORA AVE. 626.335.8782 CIVIL ENGINEER L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 CERTIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN I hereby certify that: (1) I am a professional appropriately licensed in the State of California to provide professional landscape design services. (2) The landscape design and water use calculations for the property located at (3) (provide street address or parcel number(s)) were prepared by me or under my supervision. (4) The landscape design and water use calculations for the identified property comply with the requirements of the City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 13.18) and the City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines. (5) The information I have provided in this Certificate of Landscape Design is true and correct and is hereby submitted in compliance with the City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines. Print Name Date Signature License Number Address Telephone E-mail Address Landscape Design Professional's Stamp p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE 05-31-23 RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC . a S M A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T L-2 TREE INVENTORY PLAN (REMAIN) L-8 Month Adjust Irrigation Schedule Inspect Tree Staking Flush Drip Valves Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec √ RECOMMENDED MINIMUM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE WEEKLY TASKS HOA LANDSCAPE AREAS MINIMUM RECOMMENDED YEARLY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE · Check all irrigation equipment and adjust/ align as required. · Repair irrigation equipment with originally specified materials as needed. · Inspect all landscape areas for pests/ pathogens. · Weed all shrub/ groundcover areas as needed. · Remove landscape debris. · Aerating and dethatching turf areas. · Repair planting well and/ or grade around plants to eliminate runoff. · Perform corrective pruning to eliminate hazards and damage to plant after 2nd Year of Growth. √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Add Mulch (Maintain 3" Layer) √ √ √ √ Fertilization: Reference to Agronomical Soil's report on these plans √ √ √ √ ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPE PLANS THE GRAND ESTATES 950 SILENT RANCH RD., GLENDORA, CA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72413 VICINITY MAP N.T.S FOOTHILL BLVD ROUTE 66 SIERRA MADRE AVE 210 FWY PALM DR

GRAND AVE
CITRUS AVE L-3.3 TREE INVENTORY LOT -1 02-21-2021 EXISTING TREES DATA (REMOVE) L-3.1 EXISTING TREES DATA (REMOVE) L-3.2 L-3 TREE INVENTORY PLAN (REMOVE) CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Item #8. Page 43 Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 108
ND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL LOT 1(E) POOL HOUSE (E) RESIDENCE (E) GAZEBO (E) GUEST HOUSE LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 0 NORTH 25' 50' 100'

TREE INVENTORY PLAN
(TO REMAIN IN PLACE) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE, SEE SHEETS L-2.1 & L-2.2 FOR TREE INFORMATION. PRESERVATION NOTES FOR EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 1. Temporary, protective fending shall be installed around any existing tree that is to be preserved on a project site. This fencing must 5' high, vinyl material and orange color. This fencing shall be placed at a minimum distance of fifteen (15) feet from the trunk of the tree or five (5) feet outside the drip line of the tree, whichever distance is greater. No activity, or material storage shall take place within this fenced-in area. If area must be accessed, the ground must be mitigated with mulch and plywood to absorb the effects of compaction. Signage shall be added to the fencing at spaced intervals to advise that trees are being protected and to keep out. 2. No supplemental irrigation should be introduced to tree base. 3. Limit the percentage of soil compaction within the drip line of tree. 4. No fill in or construction material shall be placed within the drip line of tree. 5. Arborist must be present during excavation near tree to verify minimal damage to root system. 6. Keep proposed drainage flow away from tree protected zone. EXISTING TREE SUMMARY 2 2 Item #8. Page 44 Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 109
R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p
L
E
R
T S
A T
i
STER
i l E
h D
GE
P
I
T

F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C
A
O

L I N I A
R
1 3 PE
N
D
S
C
S . M
a
A
y A SIGNATURE
0 A
HC I
R
CE
4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022
APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 EXISTING TREE

F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C
A
O

L I N I A
R
1 3 PE
N
D
S
C
S . M
a
A
y A SIGNATURE
0 A
HC I
R
CE
4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022
APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 EXISTING TREE

INVENTORY DATA
(TO REMAIN IN PLACE) NOTE: SEE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, SHEET-L2 FOR REFERENCE PRESERVATION NOTES FOR EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 1. Temporary, protective fending shall be installed around any existing tree that is to be preserved on a project site. This fencing must 5' high, vinyl material and orange color. This fencing shall be placed at a minimum distance of fifteen (15) feet from the trunk of the tree or five (5) feet outside the drip line of the tree, whichever distance is greater. No activity, or material storage shall take place within this fenced-in area. If area must be accessed, the ground must be mitigated with mulch and plywood to absorb the effects of compaction. Signage shall be added to the fencing at spaced intervals to advise that trees are being protected and to keep out. 2. No supplemental irrigation should be introduced to tree base. 3. Limit the percentage of soil compaction within the drip line of tree. 4. No fill in or construction material shall be placed within the drip line of tree. 5. Arborist must be present during excavation near tree to verify minimal damage to root system. 6. Keep proposed drainage flow away from tree protected zone. 2 Item #8. Page 46
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 111
ND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL LOT 1(E) POOL HOUSE (E) RESIDENCE (E) GAZEBO (E) GUEST HOUSE LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 0 NORTH 25' 50' 100'

TREE INVENTORY PLAN
(TO BE REMOVE) EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVE, SEE SHEETS L-3.1 & L-3.2 FOR TREE INFORMATION. EXISTING TREE SUMMARY 1 Item #8. Page 47 Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 112
R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p
L
E
R
T S
A T
i
STER
i l E
h D
GE
P
I
T

F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C
A
O

L I N I A
R
1 3 PE
N
D
S
C
S . M
a
A
y A SIGNATURE
0 A
HC I
R
CE
4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022
APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 EXISTING TREE

INVENTORY DATA
(TO BE REMOVE)
Item #8. Page 48
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 113
R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p
L
E
R
T S
A T
i
STER
i l E
h D
GE
P
I
T

F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C
A
O

L I N I A
R
1 3 PE
N
D
S
C
S . M
a
A
y A SIGNATURE
0 A
HC I
R
CE
4 T 05-31-23 02-21-2022
APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 EXISTING TREE

INVENTORY DATA
(TO BE REMOVE)
Item #8. Page 49
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 114
PL PL PL PL 1 2 3 5 7 8 4 6 36 9 10 11 13 14 15 12 16 19 20 18 17 21 2223 24 25 27 26 31 30 28 29 33 34 35 32 39 38 37 40 41 42 46 43 44 45 49 52 53 51 50 54 55 56 47 48 LOT 1(E) POOL HOUSE (E) RESIDENCE (E) GAZEBO (E) GUEST HOUSE GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL LOT 1(E) POOL HOUSE (E) RESIDENCE (E) GAZEBO (E) GUEST HOUSE LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 NORTH TREE INVENTORY LOT -1 L-3.3 KEY MAP 0 8' 16' 32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Item #8. Page 50 Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 115
2 2
GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 SHRUBS TREES PLANT LEGEND @ SLOPE AREAS HYDRO-SEED MIX PLANT LEGEND GROUNDCOVER PERENNIALS 2 R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 NORTH

CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" KEY MAP MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-6 MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-5 IRRIGATION NOTES 1. All proposed planting of HOA areas to be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system to comply with City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance. 2. All proposed planting outside Fuel Modification Zones, are to be irrigated with a temporarily irrigation system for hydro-seed establishment. 3. North area will be irrigated with a temporarily spray irrigation system for until plant material is established EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE, SEE "EXISTING TREES DATA" SHEETS L-3 & L-4 FOR TREE INFORMATION. 1 Item #8. Page 51 Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 116
GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 SHRUBS TREES PLANT LEGEND PLANT LEGEND GROUNDCOVER PERENNIALS 2 @ SLOPE AREAS HYDRO-SEED MIX R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" KEY MAP MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-7 MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-4 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE, SEE "EXISTING TREES DATA" SHEETS L-3 & L-4 FOR TREE INFORMATION. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. All proposed planting of HOA areas to be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system to comply with City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance. 2. All proposed planting outside Fuel Modification Zones, are to be irrigated with a temporarily irrigation system for hydro-seed establishment. 3. North area will be irrigated with a temporarily spray irrigation system for until plant material is established

CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 1 Item #8. Page 52
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 117
LOT 2 LOT 4 PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL (E) POOL HOUSE (E) GUEST HOUSE LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 SHRUBS TREES PLANT LEGEND PLANT LEGEND GROUNDCOVER PERENNIALS 2 @ SLOPE AREAS HYDRO-SEED MIX R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" KEY MAP MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-4 MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-7 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE, SEE "EXISTING TREES DATA" SHEETS L-3 & L-4 FOR TREE INFORMATION. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. All proposed planting of HOA areas to be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system to comply with City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance. 2. All proposed planting outside Fuel Modification Zones, are to be irrigated with a temporarily irrigation system for hydro-seed establishment. 3. North area will be irrigated with a temporarily spray irrigation system for until plant material is established

CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 1 Item #8. Page 53
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 118

SHRUBS TREES PLANT LEGEND
GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 "A" STREET PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 PLANT LEGEND GROUNDCOVER PERENNIALS 2 @ SLOPE AREAS HYDRO-SEED MIX R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" KEY MAP MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-8 MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-5 MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-6 IRRIGATION NOTES 1. All proposed planting of HOA areas to be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system to comply with City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance. 2. All proposed planting outside Fuel Modification Zones, are to be irrigated with a temporarily irrigation system for hydro-seed establishment. 3. North area will be irrigated with a temporarily spray irrigation system for until plant material is established

CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 1 Item #8. Page 54
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 119
GROUNDCOVER PERENNIALS SHRUBS TREES PLANT LEGEND 2
GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVELOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 "A" STREET PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL GRAND AVENUE PALM DRIVE LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 4 "A" STREET "A" STREET PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL LOT 1(E) POOL HOUSE (E) RESIDENCE (E) GAZEBO (E) GUEST HOUSE LOT 3 ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. ASPHALT PAVED RD. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R.S. R.S. CHECKED 02-21-2022 DATE DRAWN 21015 JOB NO. SHEET OF 13 SHEETS REVISIONS BY p L E R T S A T i STERi l E h D GE PI T F O DATE RENEWAL DATE F C A O L I N I A R 1 3 PE NDSC S . Ma A y A SIGNATURE 0 A HC I R CE 4T 05-31-23 02-21-2022 APN: 8684045004

THE GRAND ESTATES
950 SILENT RANCH RD.

GLENDORA, CA CITY COMMENTS 09-01-2021 1 CITY COMMENTS 02-07-2022 2 NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" KEY MAP SECTION VIEW N.T.S GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL 3 SECTION VIEW N.T.S SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 2SECTION VIEW N.T.S TREE PLANTING DETAIL 1 MATCH LINE, SEE SHEET L-7 IRRIGATION NOTES 1. All proposed planting of HOA areas to be irrigated with a permanent irrigation system to comply with City of Glendora Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance. 2. All proposed planting outside Fuel Modification Zones, are to be irrigated with a temporarily irrigation system for hydro-seed establishment. 3. North area will be irrigated with a temporarily spray irrigation system for until plant material is established

CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 Item #8. Page 55
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 120

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
City Council
__________________________________________
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Glendora will hold a public hearing pursuant to §21.01.030(E), §21.02.040, and Title 20 of the Glendora Municipal Code in the City Council Chamber of City Hall, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, California, to receive and consider all evidence and reports relating to the following application/project:

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that in the event that a state of emergency is in effect and that COVID protocols are imposed that require masking, vaccination verification and/or social distancing are in effect at the time scheduled to conduct this public hearing, it may be necessary to conduct a virtual City Council meeting utilizing the Zoom Video Communications platform. Enter meeting ID# cityofglenodra.org/zoom.

Hearing Date: January 24, 2023, at 7:00 p.m.

Case Number: PLN14-0024
(Development Plan Review, Variance and Tentative Tract Map No. 72413) Subject Property: 950 North Silent Ranch Drive (APN 8684-045-004):

The project site is approximately 27 acres in size and is an irregularly shaped hillside parcel, undeveloped except for a single-family residential home (built in 1976), remnant structures from previous uses on the site, and three flood control/debris check dam structures. The site’s southern access is Palm Drive (just west of the terminus of Grand Avenue). See area vicinity map below.

Request: Approval of a City Council resolution for the “Grand Estates Project” and its related requests. The project involves the following discretionary approvals:
 Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the site’s approximately 27 acres.

The southern 11 acres will be developed for a residential neighborhood of 13 new single-family residential lots with 2 private streets (that take single access from Palm Drive). The site’s existing single-family residence (950 North Silent Ranch Drive) will remain and be designated as a separate lot with separate access from Silent Ranch Road.

The northern 16 acres will be designated a remainder parcel for preserved open space in perpetuity and new proposed flood/debris control basin facilities.
 Variance to allow grading into 35%+ slope areas (mostly at north portion which contains moderate to steep slopes) for the construction of an access road and to demolish the site’s 3 existing flood control/debris Item #8. Page 56
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 121
dams and construct three new flood/debris control basin facilities that would be larger, and more efficient. The basins will protect the proposed residential lots and the existing neighboring homes to the south of the site.
 Development Plan Review (DPR) required for hillside development and for the Gated Community; also related is a deferred payment request related to City’s Urban Forestry Manual tree replacement in lieu fee; and
 Environmental determination for the project (CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration)
Applicant Dreamland Investments, LLC
General Plan:

Zoning
Low-Density Residential and Conservation Open Space
Estate Residential (E-7 20,000) and Open Space-Natural (OSN) Environmental: An Initial Study on the project was prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The Draft Initial Study concluded that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with inclusion of mitigation measures and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) has been prepared. The public review period for the CEQA Initial Study and Draft MND commenced on June 30, 2022 to July 29, 2022
Contact Person: Mark Carnahan, City Planner
(626) 914-8253 or [email protected]
All interested parties are invited to attend said public hearing and express their views on this matter. Should you be unable to attend the public hearing, your testimony must be made in writing and delivered prior to the scheduled hearing date as follows: City Clerk Department, 116 E. Foothill Blvd, Glendora, CA, 91741, [email protected].

Further information on this item will be posted to the city’s website at CityofGlendora.org/citymeetings and will be on file for public inspection and copying for the cost of duplication, at the office of the City Clerk, 116 E. Foothill Blvd, Glendora, CA, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays, within those hours for agenda posting and public inspection as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code 54950 et seq. as applicable to this meeting.

If you challenge this action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
Mailed: January 12, 2023
Published San Gabriel Valley Examiner: January 12, 2023 Item #8. Page 57
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 122

CERTIFICATION
I, hereby certify that I posted a copy of this Notice on the bulletin board outside the City Hall Council Chamber, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard on January 12, 2023.

Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
Area Map (not to scale):

Item #8. Page 58
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 123
950 N. Silent Ranch Dr.

Community Development Department
City Council
January 24, 2023
Mark Carnahan, City Planner
CityOfGlendora.org
Item #8. Page 59
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 124

PROJECT LOCATION
2 Item #8. Page 60
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 125
3 Item #8. Page 61
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 126
4 Item #8. Page 62
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 127
5 Item #8. Page 63
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 128
6 Item #8. Page 64
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 129
7 Item #8. Page 65
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 130
8 Item #8. Page 66
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 131
9 Item #8. Page 67
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 132
10 Item #8. Page 68
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 133
APPLICATION/PROJECT REQUEST (Project No. PLN 14-0024)
11 • Tentative Tract Map (No. 72413)
to subdivide the parcel
• Development Plan Review
required for hillside development and for the gated community • Variance
to allow grading into the 35% slope area for the construction flood debris basins • Deferred Payment Option
for the required Urban Forest Manual tree replacement in lieu fee • Environmental Determination
for the project (CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) Applicant: Dreamland Investments, LLC
Item #8. Page 69
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 134

GENERAL PLAN

LAND USE DESIGNATION
12 Item #8. Page 70
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 135

ZONING DESIGNATION
13 Item #8. Page 71
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 136
14 Item #8. Page 72
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 137
15 Item #8. Page 73
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 138
16 Item #8. Page 74
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 139
17 Item #8. Page 75
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 140
18 Item #8. Page 76
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 141
19 Item #8. Page 77
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 142
20 TREES TOTALS (current estimates)
o Existing On-Site Protected trees (over 8” DBH) = 639
o To be Retained Protected trees (over 8” DBH) = 184
o To be Removed Protected trees (over 8” DBH) = 455
o Replacement Trees required = 879
o Estimated trees to be planted by developer = 443
Item #8. Page 78
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 143
21 Current cost of the installation of new trees for the in-lieu fees:
• 24” box tree - $360
• 36” box tree - $1,000
• 48” box tree - $1,950
If developer commits to planting estimated 443 trees
- in-lieu fees approximately $593,890.

If allowed to delay and split payment among the 12 new lots - $49,490.83 per lot payment (max*)
Item #8. Page 79
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 144
22 Item #8. Page 80
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 145
23 Item #8. Page 81
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 146
24 Item #8. Page 82
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 147
25 Item #8. Page 83
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 148
26 Item #8. Page 84
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 149

LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
27 Item #8. Page 85
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 150
28 Applicants Visioning
Illustration (latest)
Item #8. Page 86
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 151
29 Applicants Visioning
“Birds Eye View”
Illustration (latest)
Item #8. Page 87
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 152
30 Item #8. Page 88
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 153
31 Item #8. Page 89
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 154
32 Item #8. Page 90
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 155
33 Item #8. Page 91
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 156
34 Item #8. Page 92
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 157
35 Item #8. Page 93
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 158
36 Item #8. Page 94
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 159
37 Item #8. Page 95
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 160
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
38 • City’s environmental consultant for the project was Dudek • City completed an Initial Study on the project in accordance with CEQA • Draft Initial Study concluded that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with inclusion of mitigation measures, and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.
• Draft IS/MND was available for public review from June 30, 2022 - July 29, 2022 • 6 written correspondence comments were submitted regarding the Draft IS/MND Item #8. Page 96
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 161

NOTICING
On January 12, 2023
• Notices were mailed out to all property owners within 500 feet • Notice was published in San Gabriel Valley Examiner
• Notice was posted on the site’s notification sign board fronting Palm Drive 39 Item #8. Page 97
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 162

RECOMMENDATIONS
40 1. Adopt an CEQA Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration; and

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the “Grand Estates” project applications:

Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, Variance, Development Plan Review (File No. PLN14-0024 - 950 N. Silent Ranch Drive)
That the City Council:

Item #8. Page 98
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 163
Item #8. Page 99
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 164
Item #8. Page 100
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 165
Item #8. Page 101
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 166

FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Grand Estates Residential Subdivision Project
Prepared for:

City of Glendora
Jeff Kugel, Community Development Director
116 East Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, California 91741
City Contact: Mark Carnahan
Prepared by:

38 N. Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
DECEMBER 2022
Item #8. Page 102
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 167
Item #8. Page 103
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 168
8375
i December 2022
Table of Contents
SECTION PAGE NO.

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. v MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ................................................................................ MMRP 1 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Project Overview................................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 California Environmental Quality Act................................................................................................. 1-1

1.3 Public Review Process ....................................................................................................................... 1-2

1.4 Conditions of Approval ....................................................................................................................... 1-3

1.5 Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 2 PROJECT SETTING AND DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Project Location.................................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Existing Conditions and Setting......................................................................................................... 2-1

2.2.1 On-Site Conditions ................................................................................................................ 2-1

2.2.2 Surrounding Land Uses ........................................................................................................ 2-2

2.2.3 Flood Control Facility Improvements ................................................................................... 2-2

2.3 Project Description ............................................................................................................................. 2-3

2.3.1 Residential Lots and Private Streets ................................................................................... 2-3

2.3.2 Landscape and Fuel Modification Improvements .............................................................. 2-6

2.3.3 Utilities................................................................................................................................... 2-7

2.3.4 Short-Term Construction Activities ...................................................................................... 2-7

2.3.5 Long-Term Operational Activities ......................................................................................... 2-8

2.4 Discretionary Actions.......................................................................................................................... 2-9

2.4.1 City of Glendora .................................................................................................................... 2-9

2.4.2 Responsible and Trustee Agencies...................................................................................... 2-9 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Aesthetics ........................................................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................................. 3-5

3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 3-7

3.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................3-16

3.5 Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................................................3-29

3.6 Energy ...............................................................................................................................................3-45

3.7 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................................3-48

3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.............................................................................................................3-57

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................................................3-63

3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality............................................................................................................3-69

3.11 Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................................................3-79 Item #8. Page 104
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 169

GRAND ESTATES RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PAGE NO.
8375
ii December 2022

3.12 Mineral Resources ...........................................................................................................................3-81

3.13 Noise .................................................................................................................................................3-82

3.14 Population and Housing...................................................................................................................3-90

3.15 Public Services .................................................................................................................................3-91

3.16 Recreation.........................................................................................................................................3-94

3.17 Transportation ..................................................................................................................................3-95

3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources.................................................................................................................3-99

3.19 Utilities and Service Systems.........................................................................................................3-103

3.20 Wildfire ............................................................................................................................................3-109

3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ..............................................................................................3-114 4 REFERENCES AND PREPARERS................................................................................................................. 4-1

4.1 References.......................................................................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 List of Preparers ................................................................................................................................. 4-7

FIGURES
2-1 Regional Location and Project Vicinity................................................................................................................1 2-2 Aerial View and Existing On-Site Features ..........................................................................................................3 2-3 Site Plan................................................................................................................................................................5 2-4a Tentative Tract Map No. 72413..........................................................................................................................7 2-4b Cross Sections of TTM No. 72413......................................................................................................................9 2-5 Preliminary Fuel Modification Plan .................................................................................................................. 11 2-6 Hillside Slope Areas of Cut/Fill......................................................................................................................... 13 3-1a View Simulation A.............................................................................................................................................. 15 3-1b View Simulation B ............................................................................................................................................. 17 3-1c View Simulation C ............................................................................................................................................. 19 3-1d View Simulation D............................................................................................................................................. 21

3.7-1 Photo Lineament............................................................................................................................................... 23

3.10-1 Existing Conditions Tributary Subareas ........................................................................................................... 25

3.10-2 Post Development Drainage Conditions.......................................................................................................... 27

3.13-1 Noise Measurement Locations ........................................................................................................................ 29

3.19-1 Proposed Water Pipeline System..................................................................................................................... 31 TABLES

1.5-1 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................................ 1-4

2.3-1 Maximum Allowable Home Sizes .................................................................................................................... 2-5

2.4-1 Responsible and Trustee Agency Approvals................................................................................................... 2-9 Item #8. Page 105
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 170

GRAND ESTATES RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PAGE NO.
8375
iii December 2022

3.3-1 Construction Scenario Assumptions.............................................................................................................3-10

3.3-2 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions.....................................................................................3-11

3.3-3 Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Emissions ......................................................................................3-12

3.3-4 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis ...........................................................................3-13

3.4-1 Permanent and Temporary Direct Impacts to Vegetation Communities and Land Covers.......................3-20

3.4-2 Direct Impacts to Potential Jurisdictional Waters ........................................................................................3-24

3.6-1 Annual Mobile Source Demand (Gasoline and Diesel)................................................................................3-47

3.8-1 Estimated Annual Construction GHG Emissions..........................................................................................3-59

3.8-2 Estimated Annual Operational GHG Emissions............................................................................................3-60

3.10-1 Debris Containment Details ..........................................................................................................................3-72

3.10-2 Pre-Development and Post-Development Outflow Comparison..................................................................3-77

3.10-3 Pre-Development Outflows to the Public Storm Drain.................................................................................3-77

3.13-1 Noise and Land Use Compatibility ................................................................................................................3-83

3.13-2 Glendora Noise Ordinance Standards ..........................................................................................................3-83

3.13-3 Ambient Measured Noise Levels...................................................................................................................3-84

3.13-4 Construction Equipment Typical Noise Emission Levels .............................................................................3-85

3.13-5 Construction Noise Model Results Summary...............................................................................................3-87

3.17-1 Trip Generation...............................................................................................................................................3-96

APPENDICES
A CalEEMod Modeling Data Sheets
B-1 Biological Resources Technical Report
B-2 Draft Architectural Landscape Plans and Tree Removals C Cultural Resources Technical Report
D Geotechnical Investigations
E Hydrology Study
F Noise Modeling Data
G Utility Studies and Will Serve Letters
H Intersection Safety Assessment
I City VMT Calculator
Item #8. Page 106
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 171
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 1

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires that, upon certification of an MND, “the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.”
This chapter contains the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) that has been developed for the Grand Estates Project (project or proposed project). This MMRP has been developed in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines. The mitigation measures in the table are coded by alphanumeric identification consistent with the EIR. The following items are identified for each mitigation measure:
• Mitigation Monitoring. This section of the MMRP lists the stage of the proposed project during which the mitigation measure would be implemented and the stage during which proper implementation would be monitored and verified. It also lists the agency that is responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented and that it is implemented properly. • Verification of Compliance. This section of the MMRP provides a location for the implementing party and/or enforcing agency to make notes and to record their initials and the compliance date for each mitigation measure.

The City Glendora must adopt this MMRP, or an equally effective program, if it approves the proposed project with the mitigation measures that were adopted or made conditions of project approval.

Item #8. Page 107
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 172
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 2
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
Aesthetics
MM-AES-1. Prior to approval of any residential development applications on Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 5 through 14, the Applicant shall provide a lighting plan to the City for their review and approval to ensure compliance with the following standards:
• All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be installed and operated in conformance with applicable Glendora standards, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 6 (and any successor regulations), and the Uniform Building and Electrical Codes. • All outdoor lights shall be directed, oriented, and shielded to prevent light trespass or glare onto adjacent properties and onto public rights-of-way.
• The candlepower of all outdoor lights shall be the minimum required to accomplish the purpose of the light, but shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles of illumination at the residential property lines.
• The height of lighting fixtures/poles shall not exceed the maximum permitted building height of the residential zone, and if attached to a single-family residence the lighting shall not exceed the height of the roof eave.

All outdoor lighting fixtures shall complement the overall architecture and design of the typical residential Glendora neighborhood in terms of scale, color, and style.

Prior to
construction on
Lots 1 through
3 and Lots 5
through 14
Submit lighting plan to
City prior to
installation for Plan
Check Review and
approval.

City of Glendora
Biological Resources
MM-BIO-1
Special-Status Wildlife Relocation Plan. The applicant shall contract with a qualified biologist, whom shall be selected subject to the City’s approval, to prepare a Relocation Plan for Terrestrial Reptiles (Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail). The Plan shall at minimum PreConstruction
and During
Construction
Preparation of a
Relocation Plan for
Terrestrial Reptiles;
Pre-Construction
Surveys; and
Monitoring during
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 108
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 173
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 3
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
include: identification of potentially occupied habitat, the timing and locations where surveys should be conducted; the habitat and conditions in the proposed relocation site(s); the methods that would be used for trapping and relocating the individual species; and requirements to provide the documentation/recordation of the species and number of animals relocated. The Plan shall be submitted to CDFW for review and must be approved by CDFW prior to commencement of any vegetation clearing or earthwork activities on the Project site.

The biologist shall look for special-status species that may be located within or immediately adjacent to (within 100 feet) of the Project work areas, as permitted by access. Any individual special-status wildlife species observed within the Project work areas during the preconstruction survey shall be flushed and moved out of harm’s way to avoid direct impacts to these species (with special-status reptiles documented and relocated as per the approved Relocation Plan).

Monitoring. A qualified biologist shall be present during initial grounddisturbing activities within the Project site. The qualified biologist shall possess an appropriate California scientific collecting permit to handle special-status species likely to occur in the Project area. If special-status species reptiles are detected in the work area during the surveys, the authorized biologist will capture and relocate individuals to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat outside of the construction area, but as close to their origin as possible (consistent with the approved Relocation Plan). All wildlife moved or flushed during Project activities shall be documented by the biologist and CDFW shall be notified. ground disturbance by
a qualified biologist.

Item #8. Page 109
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 174
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 4
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
MM-BIO-2
Nesting Bird Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the migratory bird nesting season February 15 through September 15 (as early as January 1 for some raptors) in order to avoid any potential significant impact to birds and raptors that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, an avian nesting survey of the Project site and contiguous habitat within 500 feet of all Project-related impact areas shall be conducted for protected migratory birds and active nests. The avian nesting survey shall be performed by a qualified wildlife biologist, subject to the City’s approval, within 72 hours prior to the start of construction-related activity in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703–712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513.

Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on nesting birds, sensitivity of the area, and adherence to the no-disturbance buffers. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work on the Project site and shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.

PreConstructionSchedule grounddisturbing activities
outside nesting
season; if not
possible, conduct preconstruction surveys
by a qualified biologist
City of Glendora
MM-BIO-3 PreConstruction
Schedule grounddisturbing activities
outside roosting
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 110
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 175
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 5
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
Bat Roost Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the maternity roosting season (March 1 through September 30 ), in order to avoid any potential significant impact to bat maternity roosts. If construction activities must be initiated during the maternity roosting season, a roost survey must be conducted by a qualified bat specialist , subject to the City’s approval. The roost survey for roosting bats shall be conducted on the Project site, including all trees and structures within 300 feet of Project-related impact areas, and shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities.

If bats are not detected, but the bat specialist determines that roosting bats may be present at any time of year and could roost in trees at a given location, during tree pruning, trees should be pushed using heavy machinery prior to using a chainsaw for any limbing or trimming. To ensure the optimum warning for any roosting bats that may still be present, trees should be pushed lightly two or three times, with a pause of approximately 30 seconds between each nudge to allow bats to become active. A period of at least 24 hours, and preferable 48 hours, should elapse prior to such operations to allow bats to escape.

If maternity roosting is identified, work should be scheduled between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost (March 1 to September 30).
season; if not
possible, conduct preconstruction surveys
to be conducted by a
bat specialist.

MM-BIO-4
Mitigation for direct impacts to sensitive upland vegetation communities shall be implemented through on-site creation/enhancement of remaining sensitive upland vegetation communities and/or off-site acquisition, program funding, and/or mitigation bank credits. Mitigation acreages shall be implemented as shown in Table 3.4-2 Mitigation for Direct Impacts to Sensitive Vegetation Communities.

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
or any
earthwork
Preparation of a CRP
by a Qualified
Biologist; and onsite
creation/enhancement
or off-site acquisition,
program funding,
and/or mitigation bank
credits.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 111
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 176
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 6
Sensitive
Vegetation
Community
Direct
Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
(acres)
Coast Live Oak
Woodland
Alliance*

7.71 3:1 23.13
California
Walnut Grove

0.01 3:1 0.03
Disturbed
California
Sagebrush
Scrub

0.91 1:1 0.91
Totals 8.63 — 23.33
*Excludes 1.78 acres of coast live oak woodland associated with jurisdictional waters
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, a qualified biologist, subject to the City’s approval, shall prepare a Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP) that sets forth the requirements for mitigating permanent and temporary impacts to sensitive upland vegetation communities (i.e. coast live oak woodland, California walnut grove woodland, and disturbed California sagebrush scrub) that is outside all jurisdictional water limits. Mitigation for sensitive vegetation communities associated with potential jurisdictional waters is identified in MM BIO-6. Areas of temporarily impacted sensitive vegetation communities on site shall be returned to similar conditions that existed prior to grading and/or ground-disturbing activities. Additional unimpacted areas on the Project site that support California annual non-native grassland may be enhanced to support existing sensitive native vegetation communities. The CRP shall include restoration of the following habitats:

Upland Woodlands. Impacted areas of upland woodland (i.e. coast live oak woodland and California walnut grove woodland) shall be created/restored within and adjacent to the same on-site areas that the woodland currently existed prior to Project implementation, as well as other areas deemed to have appropriate soils and topography for Item #8. Page 112
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 177
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 7
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
successful establishment. Prior to vegetation removal activities, native acorns/nuts shall be collected. Understory areas shall be revegetated with a diversity of locally-collected seeds. Temporary irrigation shall be established and maintained, with irrigation suspensions in times of rainfall.

Successful establishment of the woodland shall be determined only after removal of irrigation system and confirmed ability of the woodland to survive in the absence of irrigation. Mitigation for impacts to woodlands shall be implemented at a ratio of no less than 3:1 and shall be accomplished through a combination of on-site replacement and enhancement, on-site preservation, and off-site acquisition and/or mitigation bank credits. If feasible, woodlands would be created/restored at a minimum of 1:1 on-site, with the goal of increasing on-site restoration beyond 1:1.

Sagebrush Scrub. Impacted areas of California sagebrush scrub shall be created within and adjacent to the same on-site areas that the scrub currently exist, as well as other areas deemed to have appropriate soils and topography for successful establishment. Prior to grading activities, native and locally collected seeds shall be collected be planted on site within the mitigation areas. Irrigation shall be provided, as necessary, to assure establishment of the scrub. Based upon the disturbed, low quality nature of the existing California sagebrush scrub on site, mitigation of scrub shall be implemented at a ratio of no less than 1:1 and shall be accomplished through a combination of on-site replacement and enhancement, on-site preservation, and off-site acquisition and/or mitigation bank credits.

The CRP shall include a monitoring schedule, minimum performance standard of success, estimated costs, and identification of responsible entities. At a minimum, the CRP shall require a one-time restoration effort followed by monitoring and invasive weed removal for a minimum of 5 years following ground-disturbing activities to compensate the direct temporary impacts. The monitoring program shall ensure successful establishment of the mitigation land, and if Item #8. Page 113
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 178
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 8
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
establishment is not realized within five years, restoration activities and monitoring may continue until minimum ratios as outlined above are established. The CRP shall be submitted to the City for review and shall revised to the satisfaction of the City.

MM-BIO-5
Flagging Limits. To prevent inadvertent disturbance to sensitive vegetation communities, including jurisdictional waters, outside the limits of work, the construction limits shall be clearly demarcated (e.g., installation of flagging or temporary high visibility construction fence) prior to ground disturbance activities. All construction activities including equipment staging and maintenance shall be conducted within the marked disturbance limits.

Monitoring. A qualified biologist, subject to the City’s approval, shall be present during initial ground-disturbing activities within the Project site to ensure that Project activities stay within the demarcated limits.

PreConstruction
and During
Construction
Qualified Biologist
shall flag and be
present during ground
disturbing activities
City of Glendora
MM-BIO-6
Mitigation for direct impacts to jurisdictional waters shall be implemented through on-site enhancement of remaining jurisdictional waters and/or offsite acquisition, program funding, and/or mitigation bank credits. Mitigation ratios for each type of jurisdictional waters is shown in Table 3.4-4, Mitigation for Direct Impacts to Potential Jurisdictional Waters.

Jurisdictional
Waters Type
Direct
Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
(acres)
USACE waters
of the United
States

0.38 1:1 0.38
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
or any
earthwork
Preparation of an
HMMP by a Qualified
Biologist; and onsite
creation/restoration or
off-site acquisition,
program funding,
and/or mitigation bank
credits.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 114
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 179
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 9
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
*Parks and ornamental plantings, disturbed habitat, and developedconcrete channel On-site Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) for on-site mitigation for temporary and permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources (including coast live oak woodlands associated with the drainages), which shall include habitat enhancement and creation activities. The HMMP shall at a minimum include a feasible implementation structure, salvage/seeding details, invasive species eradication methods, irrigation system and schedule, a monitoring schedule, performance standard of success, estimated costs, and identification of responsible entities. The HMMP shall include restoration of the following habitats associated with the potential CDFW jurisdictional limits:

0.50 1:1 0.50
CDFW
streambed and
bank, with coast
live oak
woodland

1.77 3:1 5.31
CDFW
streambed and
bank, with nonriparian habitat*

0.28 1:1 0.28
Item #8. Page 115
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 180
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 10
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
have appropriate soils and topography for successful establishment. Prior to vegetation removal activities, native acorns/nuts shall be collected.

Understory areas shall be revegetated with a diversity of locally-collected seeds. Temporary irrigation shall be established and maintained, with irrigation suspensions in times of rainfall. Successful establishment of the woodland shall be determined only after removal of irrigation system and confirmed ability of the woodland to survive in the absence of irrigation. If feasible, woodlands would be created/restored at a minimum of 1:1 onsite, with the goal of increasing on-site restoration beyond 1:1.

At a minimum, the HMMP shall require a one-time restoration effort followed by monitoring and invasive weed removal for a minimum of 5 years following ground-disturbing activities to compensate the direct temporary impacts. The monitoring program shall ensure successful establishment of the mitigation land, and if establishment is not realized within five years, restoration activities and monitoring may continue until minimum ratios as outlined above are established. On-site land shall be preserved in perpetuity through a deed restriction or conservation easement, and the HMMP shall identify an approach for funding assurance for the long-term management of the conserved land. The HMMP shall be submitted to CDFW, USACE, and RWQCB for review and comment, and revised to the satisfaction of the City and the three agencies for their approval.

Off-site Mitigation. If mitigation is implemented off-site, the Project Applicant shall work with the CDFW, USACE, and RWQCB to ensure the purchase of land acquisition, mitigation program funding, and/or mitigation bank credits are appropriate to offset permanent impacts. Mitigation lands shall be comprised of similar or higher quality riparian woodland and preferably located in the vicinity of the site or watershed. Any off-site land acquisition shall be preserved in perpetuity through a deed restriction or conservation easement, and an HMMP shall be prepared that identifies an Item #8. Page 116
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 181
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 11
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
approach for funding assurance for the long-term management of the purchased land.

MM-BIO-7
On-site Mitigation. Mitigation for City protected trees shall consider and overlap with any on-site compensation for special-status vegetation communities (MM-BIO-4 and MM-BIO-5) and jurisdictional waters (MMBIO-6). Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, a qualified arborist shall conduct a tree survey to confirm previous tree inventory data points and finalize the tree count for the purposes of replacement and shall prepare a protected Tree Planting And Maintenance Plan. The Plan shall be developed by a qualified arborist or landscape architect, subject to the City’s approval, and it shall identify tree planting locations, planting stock requirements, planting techniques, maintenance standards, tree protection standards, tree survival criteria, monitoring protocols, and reporting standards. Minimum tree replacement to removal ratios shall be no less than the following for each trees diameter at breast height (dbh) in accordance with the City’s 2018 Urban Forestry Manual:

Native 8”-15” dbh 2:1 replacement
Native 16”-36” dbh 3:1 replacement
Native 37”-48” dbh 5:1 replacement
Native 49”-60” dbh 6:1 replacement
Native 61” dbh and up 7:1 replacement
Other 10”-15” dbh 1:1 replacement
Other 16”-36” dbh 1:1 replacement
Other 37”-48” dbh 2:1 replacement
Other 49”-60” dbh 3:1 replacement
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
or any
earthwork
Preparation of a Tree
Planting and
Maintenance Plan by
a Qualified Arborist or
Landscape Architect;
and onsite creation or
in-lieu fee for future
tree replacement shall
be executed per the
condition of approval
dividing the tree
replacement/ in-lieu
fee by the 12 lots and
to be executed prior
to grading permit
issuance of each
individual custom
home lot and
approved by the City
Arborist.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 117
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 182
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 12
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
Other 61” dbh and up 5:1 replacement
The plan will discuss and provide actions to prevent and minimize the spread of invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens including, but not limited to sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum), thousand canker fungus (Geosmithia morbida), polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea spp.), and goldspotted oak borer (Agrilus auroguttatus). To avoid the spread of infectious tree pests and diseases, the plan will indicate that infected trees should not be transported from a Project site without first being treated using best available management practices. The plan shall be approved by the City prior to implementation.

Off-site Mitigation. For protected trees that are not replaced on-site, an in-lieu fee for future tree replacement shall be executed per the Condition of Approval and approved by the City Arborist. The in-lieu fee is based on the City’s cost to replant and set by City resolution.

MM-BIO-8
During Construction. Prior to issuance of the Project’s grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with LACFCD to assess the feasibility of oak tree preservation within the minimal grading/grooming areas and determine whether select trees could be preserved in place while maintaining the health and safety requirements of the LACFCD debris/flood control facility functions. Trees identified as being feasibly preserved and trees within approximately 15 feet of proposed construction activity shall be temporarily fenced with chain link or other material satisfactory to City planning staff throughout grading and construction activities. The fencing shall be installed three feet outside of the dripline of each tree (or edge of canopy for cluster of trees), be four-foot-tall, and staked every 6 feet. The fenced area shall be considered the tree protection zone (TPZ) unless proximate construction required temporary removal. An International Society of Arboriculture Certified arborist shall monitor any construction activity taking place within or near to the TPZ and shall submit a Construction Observation letter to the City for approval, prior Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit;
During
Construction;
and Post
Construction
Determine trees to be
preserved;
International Society
of Arboriculture
Certified arborist shall
monitor any
construction activity;
submit annual
monitoring report.

LACFCD and
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 118
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 183
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 13
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
to final inspection, summarizing the results of the monitoring activity and resulting health of trees designated for preservation on-site.

Post-Construction. For a period of no less than 5 years from the date of final inspection, an International Society of Arboriculture Certified arborist shall submit to the City a monitoring report annually. The report shall show compliance with the tree protection conditions of approval and verification that all trees are in good health. Further, all trees that have been substantially root pruned (30% or more of their root zone) during construction within the TPZ shall be monitored by an International Society of Arboriculture Certified arborist for the first five years after construction completion. The arborist shall submit an annual report, photograph each tree and compare tree health and condition to the original, preconstruction baseline.

Cultural Resources
MM-CUL-1. In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, the construction contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within 100 feet of the discovery and shall retain a qualified archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards.

Construction activities may continue in other areas outside of the designated protection zone, which shall be delineated with cones, flagging, or fencing. The archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether the resource uncovered is a “Tribal Cultural Resources” pursuant to Section 21074 of the California Public Resources Code, or a “unique archaeological resource” pursuant to Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code or a “historical resource” pursuant to Section 15064.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

If the archaeological find is determined to be a resource, the archaeologist shall formulate a Mitigation Plan in consultation with the City of Glendora that satisfy the requirements of the above-listed Code Sections. Upon approval of the Mitigation Plan by the City, the Project During
Construction
Construction
contractor shall cease
ground-disturbing
activities in the event
of the discovery of a
possible
archaeological
resource
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 119
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 184
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 14
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
shall be implemented in compliance with the Plan. If the Archaeologist determines that the resource is not significant, s/he shall record the evaluation and submit the recordation form to the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). The archaeologist shall prepare a report of the results of any study prepared as part of a testing or Mitigation Plan, following accepted professional practice. The report shall follow guidelines of the California Office of Historic Preservation although format will be dependent on the nature of the archaeological investigation required. Copies of the report shall be submitted to the City and to the CHRIS at the SCCIC.

MM-CUL-2. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the Los Angeles County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, s/he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 48 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains.

During
Construction
Contractor shall
comply with State
Health and Safety
Code Section 7050.5
in the event of
discovery of human
remains
City of Glendora
and NAHC
Geology and Soils
MM-GEO-1. At the time of submittal of the first plan check, the Project Applicant shall provide an additional, detailed site-specific geologic evaluation of the Project site, supporting the proposed grading design to At the time of
submittal of the
first plan check
Preparation of a
detailed site-specific
geologic evaluation
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 120
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 185
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 15
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
the City for review. The recommendations of the Project-specific Preliminary Reports of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by G.A.

Nicoll and Associates, Inc. 2013 and 2016 shall be applied to the final Project designs, as applicable, and shall be refined, as necessary. In summary, preliminary recommendations to be incorporated into the Project design may include, but are not limited to: (1) removal of loose younger alluvium, existing fill, colluvium, and soil slumps and overexcavation in areas of transition to bedrock and of large trees to be removed; (2) re-use of rock materials scattered in the fill materials, as appropriate; (3) reworking/compaction of the soils to achieve 85-90% relative compaction; (4) protections of concrete and metal pipes from any high-sulphate bedrock, as appropriate; (5) buttressing of cut slopes and removal of any slump areas, finished with the sufficient added fill to buttress the remaining material; (6) slope stabilization fills and/or keys near the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) pipeline, cut slopes, and small landslide area; (7) addition of fines to the fill mixture and/or geofabric stabilization for fill slopes and buttress fills; (8) a system of subdrains and outlets to address accumulations of subsurface water from rainfall and irrigation; and (9) positive surface gradients and other drainage provisions to replace the natural flow of surface water through the canyons, with mid-slope drain and down drains for slopes of 25 feet or higher.

MM-GEO-2. Prior to the approval of the Final Plans for the proposed Project, the Project Applicant shall provide the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) with the following documents: the Tentative Tract Map; soils report and settlement analysis; laboratory testing results; detailed designs of the required secondary containment system for nonpotable utilities landscaping plans; and any other supporting documents related to development within the MWD easement, including details of the retaining wall, foundations, and supporting calculations, shall be stamped and signed and submitted for MWD’s review and written approval.

Prior to the
approval of final
plans; and post
construction.

Submit requested
documents to MWD
prior to approval of
final plans; post
construction written
notification to the
property owners of
Lots 7, 8, and 9
MWD and City of
Glendora
Item #8. Page 121
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 186
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 16
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
The Tentative Tract Map shall identify the following features and requirements:
• Gates or removable bollards, capable of accommodating MWD’s locks, shall be installed at the location of the driveway approach to the Upper Feeder to prevent unauthorized entry to MWD’s right-of-way;
• Bollards shall be placed on the south side of City of Glendora / LA County Flood Control’s maintenance road to protect MWD’s 10-foot-inside-diameter air vent shaft (at Station 2280+51) from damage;
• Building structures of any kind and trees are prohibited within the limits of the MWD easement.
• Any intrusion, modification, or destruction of any aspect of this Monrovia No. 1 tunnel segment of the MWD Upper Feeder
pipeline or the hatch are prohibited.

The CCRs of the Homeowner’s Association shall also require that all property owners of land with the MWD easement shall be notified that structures of any kind and trees are prohibited within the limits of the MWD easement.

PreConstruction
and during
construction
Qualified
paleontologist shall
prepare a PRIMP and
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 122
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 187
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 17
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
The paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the proposed Project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the guidelines of the SVP and should outline requirements for preconstruction meeting attendance and worker environmental awareness training, where monitoring is required within the Project area based on construction plans and/or geotechnical reports, procedures for adequate paleontological monitoring and discoveries treatment, and paleontological methods (including sediment sampling for microvertebrate fossils), reporting, and collections management. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and a paleontological monitor shall be on-site during all rough grading and other significant ground-disturbing activities in previously undisturbed, fine-grained older Quaternary alluvial fan deposits. These deposits may be encountered at depths as shallow as 5-10 feet below ground surface. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontological monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find.
monitor ground
disturbing activities
Noise
MM-NOI-1. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit construction plans and/or specifications to the City of Glendora Planning Division demonstrating compliance with the following:
• The location and design of a temporary noise barrier between the construction area and the adjacent residences. Given that a retaining wall is proposed between the project access road and the adjoining residential properties, said retaining wall, constructed as part of the proposed Project, shall be erected Prior to
issuance of
grading permit
Submit Construction
Plans and/or
Specifications
Demonstrating
Compliance
City of Glendora
Planning Division
Item #8. Page 123
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 188
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 18
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
immediately as the first component of construction, to function as a noise barrier. As necessary, temporary height extensions to the retaining wall to achieve a minimum height of 12 feet from the wall base on the project side to the top of the barrier, shall be added and maintained for the duration of construction. If immediate installation of the boundary retaining wall is not feasible for construction progression, then a temporary barrier shall be installed in the eventual location of the retaining wall.

The temporary noise barrier or temporary height extension of the retaining wall to achieve a 12-foot-high noise control barrier shall be constructed with plywood that is at least ½ inch thick or with another material that creates a noise transmission loss of at least 20 dBA.
• All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. Enforcement shall be accomplished by random field inspections by applicant personnel during construction activities, to the satisfaction of the City.
• Construction noise reduction methods such as shutting off idling equipment, maximizing the distance between construction equipment staging areas and adjacent residences, and use of electric air compressors and similar power tools, rather than diesel equipment, shall be used where feasible.
• During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from or shielded from sensitive receptors.
• Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow surrounding property owners to contact the job superintendent if necessary. In the event the City of Glendora receives a complaint, appropriate Item #8. Page 124
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 189
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 19
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
corrective actions shall be implemented and a report of the action provided to the reporting party.

Transportation
MM-TRAF-1. Prior to the start of any Project-related construction, the Applicant shall develop and implement a Project-specific Traffic Control Plan (TCP). At a minimum, the TCP shall require the use of a flagman at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Palm Drive throughout all phases of construction activity that require heavy truck traffic through the intersection. The TCP shall be stamped and signed by a licensed Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer in the State of California. The TCP shall be prepared in accordance with applicable regulations and standards, including the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), and approved by all regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the work locations shown in the TCP, including the City of Glendora.

PreConstruction Preparation of a
Project-Specific TCP
by a Traffic or Civil
Engineer
City of Glendora
and any
regulatory
agencies having
jurisdiction
MM-TRAF-2. Prior to issuance of a occupancy permit for any habitable structures on any Project site, the Applicant shall complete the following improvements to the Grand Avenue and Palm Drive intersection and immediate vicinity, as provided by the City of Glendora in the 2020 Grand Avenue/Palm Drive Intersection Safety Assessment, to the satisfaction of the City:
(1) Relocate existing stop sign and street name sign onto a new taller post. The bottom section of the stop sign is currently 5.5 feet above sidewalk grade. Per the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the vertical clearance of all signs should be 7 feet minimum.
(2) Repaint red curb on the west side of Grand Avenue where the street narrows to 18 feet in width.
(3) Upgrade the existing wood pole streetlight at the
intersection to LED.

Prior to
Occupancy
Permit
Complete
Improvements to
Grand Avenue and
Palm Drive
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 125
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 190
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 20
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
(4) Relocate 25 mph speed limit sign onto the existing
streetlight. Currently, the speed limit sign is obscured behind the street light pole. Remove signpost.
(5) Ensure sidewalk fronting the development are cleared from trees/debris. Include curb ramps on the north and
south sides of the intersection.
(6) Add a 50-foot red curb on the south side of Palm Drive starting at Repaint stop legend and stop bar.

Tribal Cultural Resources
MM-TCR-1. Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant. The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area.

The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The onsite monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.

Prior to
issuance of
grading permit;
and during
grading
Applicant to contract
with the tribe to retain
a Tribal Monitor
approved by the
Gabrieleño Band of
Mission Indians-Kizh
Nation Tribal
Government. Signed
contract must be
submitted to the City
prior to issuance of a
grading permit.

City of Glendora
MM-TRC-2. Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources During
Construction
Qualified
Archaeologist shall
halt work in vicinity of
potential
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 126
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 191
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 21
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission IndiansKizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and unique archaeological resources.
archaeological and/or
tribal cultural
resources
MM-TRC-3. Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.

During
Construction
Compliance with
Public Resources
Code Sections
21083.2(b)
City of Glendora
MM-TCR-4. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and
Associated Funerary Objects. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in During
construction
Compliance with
health and Safety
Code 7050.5
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 127
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 192
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 22
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.

MM-TCR-5. Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work
Protocol. Upon discovery of human remains and associated funerary objects, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant(s) will immediately divert work within a minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD).

During
construction
Tribal Monitor to
divert work upon
discovery of human
remains
City of Glendora
MM-TCR-6. Kizh-Gabrieleño Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains. If the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are During
Construction
Compliance with
specific treatment
measures is
Gabrieleño Band of
Mission Indians –
Kizh Nation is
designated MLD.

Gabrieleño Band
of Mission
Indians – Kizh
Nation
Item #8. Page 128
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 193
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 23
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects.

MM-TCR-7. Treatment Measures. Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the Project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the Project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the Project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities shall be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains.

Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should During
Construction
Comply with specific
treatment measures
for the respectful
reburial of human
remains or ceremonial
objects.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 129
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 194
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 24
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
be retained and reburied within 6 months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.

MM-TCR-8. Professional Standards. Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in Southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified.

During
excavation or
construction
Qualified person
meeting Secretary of
the Interior’s
standards shall
consult with the City
City of Glendora
Utilities and Service Systems
MM-UTL-1. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the Project Applicant shall provide the City with payment of the Project’s fairshare contribution to the replacement of the Zone 11 hydro-pneumatic system (pumps, tank, and controls) to provide a reliable water delivery system for Zone 11 homes. The replacement facilities shall be fully operational and all required access easements for the construction and long-term maintenance of the off-site water lines shall be in place prior to the occupancy of the Lots 2 and 3.

Prior to
issuance of
occupancy
permit
Provide fair-share
payment
City of Glendora
MM-UTL-2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide the City with documentation that confirms the review and approval of the Project’s fire flow requirements and the locations of new fire hydrants by Los Angeles County Fire Department.

Prior to
issuance of
grading permit
Submit
documentation of fire
flow requirements and
locations of new
hydrants
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 130
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 195
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 25

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 131
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 196

GRAND ESTATES RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
iv December 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 132
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 197
8375
v December 2022
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
AB Assembly Bill
ADT average daily trips
amsl above mean sea level
ANF Angeles National Forest
APE area of potential effects
APN Assessor Parcel Number
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BMP best management practice
BRTR Biological Resources Technical Report
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CARB California Air Resources Board
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
cfs cubic feet per second
CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System City City of Glendora
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
County County of Los Angeles
CRP Conceptual Restoration Plan
dBA A-weighted decibel
dbh diameter at breast height
DOC California Department of Conservation
DWR California Department of Water Resources
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EO Executive Order
FAR Floor Area Ratio
GHG greenhouse gas
gpm gallons per minute
GWP global warming potential
HMMP Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
I Interstate
IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
LACDPW Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
LACFCD Los Angeles County Flood Control District
LACFD Los Angeles County Fire Department
LACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
LACSD Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
LARWQCB Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Leq equivalent continuous sound level
LID Low Impact Development
LOS level of service
Item #8. Page 133
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 198

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
vi December 2022
Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
LST localized significance threshold
mgd million gallons per day
MHFP Multi-Hazard Functional Plan
MLD Most Likely Descendant
MM mitigation measure
MT metric ton
MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
PPV Peak Particle Velocity
PRIMP Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program proposed Project Grand Estates Project
RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SB Senate Bill
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center
SCE Southern California Edison
SR State Route
SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC toxic air contaminant
TCR tribal cultural resource
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VMT vehicle miles traveled
VOC volatile organic gas
WRP Water Reclamation Plant
Item #8. Page 134
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 199
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 1

The City Glendora must adopt this MMRP, or an equally effective program, if it approves the proposed project with the mitigation measures that were adopted or made conditions of project approval.

Item #8. Page 135
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 200
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 2
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
Aesthetics
MM-AES-1. Prior to approval of any residential development applications on Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 5 through 14, the Applicant shall provide a lighting plan to the City for their review and approval to ensure compliance with the following standards:
• All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be installed and operated in conformance with applicable Glendora standards, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 6 (and any successor regulations), and the Uniform Building and Electrical Codes. • All outdoor lights shall be directed, oriented, and shielded to prevent light trespass or glare onto adjacent properties and onto public rights-of-way.
• The candlepower of all outdoor lights shall be the minimum required to accomplish the purpose of the light, but shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles of illumination at the residential property lines.
• The height of lighting fixtures/poles shall not exceed the maximum permitted building height of the residential zone, and if attached to a single-family residence the lighting shall not exceed the height of the roof eave.

All outdoor lighting fixtures shall complement the overall architecture and design of the typical residential Glendora neighborhood in terms of scale, color, and style.

Prior to
construction on
Lots 1 through
3 and Lots 5
through 14
Submit lighting plan to
City prior to
installation for Plan
Check Review and
approval.

City of Glendora
Biological Resources
MM-BIO-1
Special-Status Wildlife Relocation Plan. The applicant shall contract with a qualified biologist, whom shall be selected subject to the City’s approval, to prepare a Relocation Plan for Terrestrial Reptiles (Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail). The Plan shall at minimum PreConstruction
and During
Construction
Preparation of a
Relocation Plan for
Terrestrial Reptiles;
Pre-Construction
Surveys; and
Monitoring during
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 136
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 201
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 3
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
include: identification of potentially occupied habitat, the timing and locations where surveys should be conducted; the habitat and conditions in the proposed relocation site(s); the methods that would be used for trapping and relocating the individual species; and requirements to provide the documentation/recordation of the species and number of animals relocated. The Plan shall be submitted to CDFW for review and must be approved by CDFW prior to commencement of any vegetation clearing or earthwork activities on the Project site.

Item #8. Page 137
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 202
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 4
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
MM-BIO-2
Nesting Bird Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the migratory bird nesting season February 15 through September 15 (as early as January 1 for some raptors) in order to avoid any potential significant impact to birds and raptors that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, an avian nesting survey of the Project site and contiguous habitat within 500 feet of all Project-related impact areas shall be conducted for protected migratory birds and active nests. The avian nesting survey shall be performed by a qualified wildlife biologist, subject to the City’s approval, within 72 hours prior to the start of construction-related activity in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703–712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513.

PreConstructionSchedule grounddisturbing activities
outside nesting
season; if not
possible, conduct preconstruction surveys
by a qualified biologist
City of Glendora
MM-BIO-3 PreConstruction
Schedule grounddisturbing activities
outside roosting
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 138
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 203
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 5
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
Bat Roost Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the maternity roosting season (March 1 through September 30 ), in order to avoid any potential significant impact to bat maternity roosts. If construction activities must be initiated during the maternity roosting season, a roost survey must be conducted by a qualified bat specialist , subject to the City’s approval. The roost survey for roosting bats shall be conducted on the Project site, including all trees and structures within 300 feet of Project-related impact areas, and shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities.

If maternity roosting is identified, work should be scheduled between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost (March 1 to September 30).
season; if not
possible, conduct preconstruction surveys
to be conducted by a
bat specialist.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 139
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 204
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 6
Sensitive
Vegetation
Community
Direct
Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
(acres)
Coast Live Oak
Woodland
Alliance*

7.71 3:1 23.13
California
Walnut Grove

0.01 3:1 0.03
Disturbed
California
Sagebrush
Scrub

Upland Woodlands. Impacted areas of upland woodland (i.e. coast live oak woodland and California walnut grove woodland) shall be created/restored within and adjacent to the same on-site areas that the woodland currently existed prior to Project implementation, as well as other areas deemed to have appropriate soils and topography for Item #8. Page 140
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 205
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 7
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
successful establishment. Prior to vegetation removal activities, native acorns/nuts shall be collected. Understory areas shall be revegetated with a diversity of locally-collected seeds. Temporary irrigation shall be established and maintained, with irrigation suspensions in times of rainfall.

The CRP shall include a monitoring schedule, minimum performance standard of success, estimated costs, and identification of responsible entities. At a minimum, the CRP shall require a one-time restoration effort followed by monitoring and invasive weed removal for a minimum of 5 years following ground-disturbing activities to compensate the direct temporary impacts. The monitoring program shall ensure successful establishment of the mitigation land, and if Item #8. Page 141
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 206
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 8
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
establishment is not realized within five years, restoration activities and monitoring may continue until minimum ratios as outlined above are established. The CRP shall be submitted to the City for review and shall revised to the satisfaction of the City.

Jurisdictional
Waters Type
Direct
Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
(acres)
USACE waters
of the United
States

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 142
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 207
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 9
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
*Parks and ornamental plantings, disturbed habitat, and developedconcrete channel On-site Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) for on-site mitigation for temporary and permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources (including coast live oak woodlands associated with the drainages), which shall include habitat enhancement and creation activities. The HMMP shall at a minimum include a feasible implementation structure, salvage/seeding details, invasive species eradication methods, irrigation system and schedule, a monitoring schedule, performance standard of success, estimated costs, and identification of responsible entities. The HMMP shall include restoration of the following habitats associated with the potential CDFW jurisdictional limits:

0.50 1:1 0.50
CDFW
streambed and
bank, with coast
live oak
woodland

1.77 3:1 5.31
CDFW
streambed and
bank, with nonriparian habitat*

0.28 1:1 0.28
Item #8. Page 143
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 208
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 10
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
have appropriate soils and topography for successful establishment. Prior to vegetation removal activities, native acorns/nuts shall be collected.

Off-site Mitigation. If mitigation is implemented off-site, the Project Applicant shall work with the CDFW, USACE, and RWQCB to ensure the purchase of land acquisition, mitigation program funding, and/or mitigation bank credits are appropriate to offset permanent impacts. Mitigation lands shall be comprised of similar or higher quality riparian woodland and preferably located in the vicinity of the site or watershed. Any off-site land acquisition shall be preserved in perpetuity through a deed restriction or conservation easement, and an HMMP shall be prepared that identifies an Item #8. Page 144
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 209
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 11
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
approach for funding assurance for the long-term management of the purchased land.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 145
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 210
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 12
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
Other 61” dbh and up 5:1 replacement
The plan will discuss and provide actions to prevent and minimize the spread of invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens including, but not limited to sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum), thousand canker fungus (Geosmithia morbida), polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea spp.), and goldspotted oak borer (Agrilus auroguttatus). To avoid the spread of infectious tree pests and diseases, the plan will indicate that infected trees should not be transported from a Project site without first being treated using best available management practices. The plan shall be approved by the City prior to implementation.

LACFCD and
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 146
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 211
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 13
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
to final inspection, summarizing the results of the monitoring activity and resulting health of trees designated for preservation on-site.

If the archaeological find is determined to be a resource, the archaeologist shall formulate a Mitigation Plan in consultation with the City of Glendora that satisfy the requirements of the above-listed Code Sections. Upon approval of the Mitigation Plan by the City, the Project During
Construction
Construction
contractor shall cease
ground-disturbing
activities in the event
of the discovery of a
possible
archaeological
resource
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 147
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 212
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 14
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
shall be implemented in compliance with the Plan. If the Archaeologist determines that the resource is not significant, s/he shall record the evaluation and submit the recordation form to the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). The archaeologist shall prepare a report of the results of any study prepared as part of a testing or Mitigation Plan, following accepted professional practice. The report shall follow guidelines of the California Office of Historic Preservation although format will be dependent on the nature of the archaeological investigation required. Copies of the report shall be submitted to the City and to the CHRIS at the SCCIC.

During
Construction
Contractor shall
comply with State
Health and Safety
Code Section 7050.5
in the event of
discovery of human
remains
City of Glendora
and NAHC
Geology and Soils
MM-GEO-1. At the time of submittal of the first plan check, the Project Applicant shall provide an additional, detailed site-specific geologic evaluation of the Project site, supporting the proposed grading design to At the time of
submittal of the
first plan check
Preparation of a
detailed site-specific
geologic evaluation
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 148
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 213
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 15
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
the City for review. The recommendations of the Project-specific Preliminary Reports of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by G.A.

Prior to the
approval of final
plans; and post
construction.

Submit requested
documents to MWD
prior to approval of
final plans; post
construction written
notification to the
property owners of
Lots 7, 8, and 9
MWD and City of
Glendora
Item #8. Page 149
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 214
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 16
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
The Tentative Tract Map shall identify the following features and requirements:
• Gates or removable bollards, capable of accommodating MWD’s locks, shall be installed at the location of the driveway approach to the Upper Feeder to prevent unauthorized entry to MWD’s right-of-way;
• Bollards shall be placed on the south side of City of Glendora / LA County Flood Control’s maintenance road to protect MWD’s 10-foot-inside-diameter air vent shaft (at Station 2280+51) from damage;
• Building structures of any kind and trees are prohibited within the limits of the MWD easement.
• Any intrusion, modification, or destruction of any aspect of this Monrovia No. 1 tunnel segment of the MWD Upper Feeder
pipeline or the hatch are prohibited.

PreConstruction
and during
construction
Qualified
paleontologist shall
prepare a PRIMP and
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 150
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 215
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 17
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
The paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the proposed Project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the guidelines of the SVP and should outline requirements for preconstruction meeting attendance and worker environmental awareness training, where monitoring is required within the Project area based on construction plans and/or geotechnical reports, procedures for adequate paleontological monitoring and discoveries treatment, and paleontological methods (including sediment sampling for microvertebrate fossils), reporting, and collections management. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and a paleontological monitor shall be on-site during all rough grading and other significant ground-disturbing activities in previously undisturbed, fine-grained older Quaternary alluvial fan deposits. These deposits may be encountered at depths as shallow as 5-10 feet below ground surface. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontological monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find.
monitor ground
disturbing activities
Noise
MM-NOI-1. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit construction plans and/or specifications to the City of Glendora Planning Division demonstrating compliance with the following:
• The location and design of a temporary noise barrier between the construction area and the adjacent residences. Given that a retaining wall is proposed between the project access road and the adjoining residential properties, said retaining wall, constructed as part of the proposed Project, shall be erected Prior to
issuance of
grading permit
Submit Construction
Plans and/or
Specifications
Demonstrating
Compliance
City of Glendora
Planning Division
Item #8. Page 151
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 216
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 18
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
immediately as the first component of construction, to function as a noise barrier. As necessary, temporary height extensions to the retaining wall to achieve a minimum height of 12 feet from the wall base on the project side to the top of the barrier, shall be added and maintained for the duration of construction. If immediate installation of the boundary retaining wall is not feasible for construction progression, then a temporary barrier shall be installed in the eventual location of the retaining wall.

The temporary noise barrier or temporary height extension of the retaining wall to achieve a 12-foot-high noise control barrier shall be constructed with plywood that is at least ½ inch thick or with another material that creates a noise transmission loss of at least 20 dBA.
• All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. Enforcement shall be accomplished by random field inspections by applicant personnel during construction activities, to the satisfaction of the City.
• Construction noise reduction methods such as shutting off idling equipment, maximizing the distance between construction equipment staging areas and adjacent residences, and use of electric air compressors and similar power tools, rather than diesel equipment, shall be used where feasible.
• During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from or shielded from sensitive receptors.
• Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow surrounding property owners to contact the job superintendent if necessary. In the event the City of Glendora receives a complaint, appropriate Item #8. Page 152
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 217
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 19
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
corrective actions shall be implemented and a report of the action provided to the reporting party.

Prior to
Occupancy
Permit
Complete
Improvements to
Grand Avenue and
Palm Drive
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 153
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 218
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 20
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
(4) Relocate 25 mph speed limit sign onto the existing
streetlight. Currently, the speed limit sign is obscured behind the street light pole. Remove signpost.
(5) Ensure sidewalk fronting the development are cleared from trees/debris. Include curb ramps on the north and
south sides of the intersection.
(6) Add a 50-foot red curb on the south side of Palm Drive starting at Repaint stop legend and stop bar.

City of Glendora
MM-TRC-2. Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources During
Construction
Qualified
Archaeologist shall
halt work in vicinity of
potential
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 154
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 219
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 21
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission IndiansKizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and unique archaeological resources.
archaeological and/or
tribal cultural
resources
MM-TRC-3. Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.

During
Construction
Compliance with
Public Resources
Code Sections
21083.2(b)
City of Glendora
MM-TCR-4. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and
Associated Funerary Objects. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in During
construction
Compliance with
health and Safety
Code 7050.5
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 155
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 220
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 22
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.

Gabrieleño Band
of Mission
Indians – Kizh
Nation
Item #8. Page 156
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 221
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 23
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects.

City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 157
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 222
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 24
Mitigation Measure
Mitigation Monitoring Verification of Compliance
Monitoring
Phase Monitoring Method
Enforcing
Agency &
Responsible
Agency Initial Date Comments
be retained and reburied within 6 months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.

Prior to
issuance of
grading permit
Submit
documentation of fire
flow requirements and
locations of new
hydrants
City of Glendora
Item #8. Page 158
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 223
4 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Grand Estates Final MND MMRP 8375
December 2022 MMRP 25

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 159
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 224
8375
1-1 December 2022
1 Introduction

1.1 Project Overview
The Grand Estates Project (proposed Project) involves the subdivision of a hillside property in the City of Glendora (City) for the development of a gated-community consisting of 13 new single-family residential lots, one with an existing residence, and one lot for two Private Streets for a total of 14 lots and one designated remainder parcel. It is expected that the 12 new single-family residential lots within the new gated community will be developed in the future, with custom homes, constructed by the individual lot owners, as the market will bear. The existing home, driveway, garages, landscaping, etc. currently located on the westerly end of the property will remain in place and will be located entirely within the newly created lot #1. The Project site is approximately 27 acres in size and is located at 950 North Silent Ranch Drive, at the northern terminus of Grand Avenue in the City of Glendora. The Project site is currently undeveloped, with the exception of a singlefamily residence, remnant structures from previous uses on the site, and three flood control/debris check dam structures. The three existing flood control structures would be removed and redeveloped under current standards to provide effective protection from potential debris flows and flooding from the hillside areas to the north. One flood control access road would also be constructed and connected to the main proposed Private Street.

The Project site’s assessor parcel number (APN) is 8684-045-004 and the existing zoning is E7-20,000 within the Single-Family Residential land use designation within the City’s General Plan, also known as the Glendora Community Plan 2025. The property currently contains easements of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), Southern California Edison Company (SCE), Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone Company of California, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD).

1.2 California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) applies to projects initiated by, funded by, or requiring discretionary approvals from state or local government agencies. The proposed Project constitutes a project as defined by CEQA (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.). CEQA Guidelines Section 15367 states that a “Lead Agency” is “the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project.” Therefore, the City of Glendora (City) is the lead agency responsible for compliance with CEQA for the proposed Project.

As the lead agency, the City must complete an environmental review to determine if implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. To fulfill the purpose of CEQA, an Initial Study has been prepared to assist in making that determination. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(d), an Initial Study must contain the following:
(1) A description of the project including the location of the project; (2) An identification of the environmental setting;
(3) An identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries. The brief explanation may be either through a narrative or a reference to another information source such as an attached map, photographs, or an earlier EIR or negative declaration. A reference to another document should include, where appropriate, a citation to the page or pages where the information is found.

Item #8. Page 160
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 225

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-2 December 2022
(4) A discussion of the ways to mitigate the significant effects identified, if any; (5) An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and,
(6) The name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the Initial Study.

Based on the nature and scope of the proposed Project and the evaluation contained in the Initial Study environmental checklist (contained herein), the City, as the lead agency, concluded that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is the proper level of environmental documentation for this proposed Project. The Initial Study shows that impacts caused by the proposed Project are either less than significant or significant but mitigable with incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures as defined herein. This conclusion is supported by CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, which states that a MND can be prepared when “(a) the initial study shows that there is not substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, or (b) the initial study identifies potentially significant effects, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by the applicant, before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and (2) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.”
This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is composed of four sections. Section 1 provides a general overview of the proposed Project, CEQA requirements related to the Project, the public review process, and a summary of the mitigation measures required. Section 2 provides a description of the environmental setting and the proposed Project components, anticipated construction schedule, and operational characteristics. Section 3 includes the CEQA Initial Study checklist, which provides an assessment of potential environmental impacts and identifies mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant. Section 4 provides a list of staff and consultants involved in preparing the IS/MND. The IS/MND also includes Appendices that contain technical memoranda, reports, and/or data files related to and referenced in the impact analyses.

1.3 Public Review Process
In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a 30-day public review period for this IS/MND commenced on June 30, 2022, and will concludeconcluded on July 29, 2022. The IS/MND has been distributed for review to interested and involved public agencies, responsible/trustee agencies, organizations, and private individuals that have requested in writing to be informed of the proposed Project. A hardcopy of the IS/MND is also available for public review during regular business hours at:

City of Glendora Planning Division
116 East Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, California 91741
and
Glendora Public Library
140 S. Glendora Avenue
Glendora, California 91741
An electronic copy of the IS/MND can be viewed at: https://www.cityofglendora.org/businesses/public-notices Item #8. Page 161
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 226

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-3 December 2022
During the 30-day public review period, the public will have the opportunity to provide written comments on the information contained within this IS/MND. The City’s discretionary approval/refusal of the proposed Project will also be based on the information contained in this document.

In reviewing the IS/MND, interested members of the public should focus on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing potential Project impacts on the environment, as well as the sufficiency of any mitigation measures proposed to reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. Comments on the IS/MND should be submitted by the end of the 30-day public review period and must be postmarked by July 29, 2022. Please submit written comments by mail, fax, or via email with the subject line “Grand Estates Project” to the following address:

Mark Carnahan
City of Glendora Community Development Department
116 East Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, California 91741-3380
Fax: 626-914-8221
[email protected]

1.4 Conditions of Approval
The following conditions of approval, mandated by the City, would be implemented as part of the proposed Project:
• Proper notification and coordination with adjacent property owners shall be implemented prior to the start of construction activities.
• Fencing shall be installed between the proposed construction areas and adjacent residences. Off-site temporary construction easements may also be requested. • Off-site improvements and construction within existing sidewalks shall include reconstruction of these sidewalks, once storm drain improvements are completed. • The Homeowner’s Association (HOA) will be established upon the occupancy of the first custom home.

The covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs) of the HOA must be approved prior to issuance of a grading permit so that all hydroseeding, watering, maintenance of the HOA areas and the habitat restoration areas; additional mitigation requirements; and other conditions or approvals would be established prior to construction of the proposed Project. • The TTM must include a note for Lots 2 and 3, which would be served by the hydro-pneumatic tank system, that these lots cannot be occupied prior to completion of the City-sponsored infrastructure improvement to the water tank.

1.5 Mitigation Measures
Prior to mitigation, Project implementation would result in potentially significant impacts to certain thresholds within the CEQA Checklist topics of Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Noise, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. However, mitigation measures (MMs) have been developed to avoid or reduce these impacts to levels considered less than significant. These MMs would be included in Item #8. Page 162
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 227

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-4 December 2022
the Contractor Specifications and bid documents, as appropriate, and verified as part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. These MMs must be implemented to the satisfaction of the City and are listed below in Table 1.5-1, Mitigation Measures.

Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
Aesthetics
The Project has the potential to
create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area.

MM-AES-1. Prior to approval of any residential development applications on Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 5 through 14, the Applicant shall provide a lighting plan to the City for their review and approval to ensure compliance with the following standards:
• All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be installed and operated in conformance with applicable Glendora standards, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 6 (and any successor regulations), and the Uniform Building and Electrical Codes. • All outdoor lights shall be directed, oriented, and shielded to prevent light trespass or glare onto adjacent properties and onto public rights-of-way. • The candlepower of all outdoor lights shall be the minimum required to accomplish the purpose of the light, but shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles of illumination at the residential property lines.
• The height of lighting fixtures/poles shall not exceed the maximum permitted building height of the residential zone, and if attached to a single-family residence the lighting shall not exceed the height of the roof eave.
• All outdoor lighting fixtures shall complement the overall architecture and design of the typical residential Glendora neighborhood in terms of scale, color, and style.

Biological Resources
The Project has the potential to
result in direct Impacts to
Terrestrial Special-Status Wildlife.

MM-BIO-1
Special-Status Wildlife Relocation Plan. The applicant shall contract with a qualified biologist, whom shall be selected subject to the City’s approval, to prepare a Relocation Plan for Terrestrial Reptiles (Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail). The Plan shall at minimum include: identification of potentially occupied habitat, the timing and locations where surveys should be conducted; the habitat and conditions in the proposed relocation site(s); the methods that would be used for trapping and relocating the individual species; and requirements to provide the documentation/recordation of the species and number of animals relocated. The Plan shall be submitted to CDFW for review and must be approved by CDFW prior to commencement of any vegetation clearing or earthwork activities on the Project site.

Pre-Construction Surveys. Prior commencement of any vegetation clearing or earthwork activities on the Project site, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey within areas of suitable habitat identified in the Relocation Plan for Terrestrial Reptiles for special-status species wildlife (Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail). The biologist shall look for special-status species that may be located within or immediately adjacent to (within 100 feet) of the Project work areas, as permitted by access. Any individual special-status wildlife species observed within the Project work areas during the pre-construction survey shall be flushed and moved out of harm’s way to avoid direct impacts to these species (with special-status reptiles documented and relocated as per the approved Relocation Plan).

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-5 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
detected in the work area during the surveys, the authorized biologist will capture and relocate individuals to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat outside of the construction area, but as close to their origin as possible (consistent with the approved Relocation Plan). All wildlife moved or flushed during Project activities shall be documented by the biologist and CDFW shall be notified.

The Project has the potential to
result in direct and indirect
impacts to special-status and
nesting birds.

MM-BIO-2
Nesting Bird Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the migratory bird nesting season February 15 through September 15 (as early as January 1 for some raptors) (February 1 through August 31) in order to avoid any potential significant impact to birds and raptors that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, an avian nesting survey of the Project site and contiguous habitat within 500 feet of all Project-related impact areas shall be conducted for protected migratory birds and active nests. The avian nesting survey shall be performed by a qualified wildlife biologist, subject to the City’s approval, within 72 hours prior to the start of construction-related activity in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703–712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513.

If an active bird nest is found, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans along with an appropriate no disturbance buffer, which shall be determined by the qualified wildlife biologist based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance (minimum of 50 feet for common, urban-adapted species, 300 feet for other passerine species, and 500 feet for raptors and 0.5 mile special-status species). The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing and shall be avoided until the nest is vacated and the juveniles have fledged. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on nesting birds, sensitivity of the area, and adherence to the no-disturbance buffers. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work on the Project site and shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.

The Project has the potential to
result in direct and indirect
impacts to special-status bats.

MM-BIO-3
Bat Roost Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the maternity roosting season (March 1 through September 30 August), in order to avoid any potential significant impact to bat maternity roosts. If construction activities must be initiated during the maternity roosting season, a roost survey must be conducted by a qualified bat specialist biologist, subject to the City’s approval. The roost survey for roosting bats shall be conducted on the Project site, including all trees and structures within 300 feet of Project-related impact areas, and shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities.

If maternity roosting is identified, work should be scheduled between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost (March 1 to September 30). those trees and/or occupied structures shall not be removed during the bat maternity roost season (March to August) and a minimum 300-foot buffer shall be established. The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes and the roost shall be monitored by a qualified biologist until roost is vacated and juveniles have fledged.

Item #8. Page 164
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 229

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-6 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
The Project has the potential to
result in direct impacts to sensitive
upland vegetation communities.

Sensitive Vegetation
Community
Direct
Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
(acres)
Coast Live Oak Woodland
Alliance*

7.71 3:1 23.13
California Walnut Grove 0.01 3:1 0.03
Disturbed California Sagebrush
Scrub

0.91 1:1 0.91
Totals 8.63 — 23.33
*Excludes 1.78 acres of coast live oak woodland associated with jurisdictional waters Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, a qualified biologist, subject to the City’s approval, shall prepare a Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP) that sets forth the requirements for mitigating permanent and temporary impacts to sensitive upland vegetation communities (i.e. coast live oak woodland, California walnut grove woodland, and disturbed California sagebrush scrub) that is outside all jurisdictional water limits. Mitigation for sensitive vegetation communities associated with potential jurisdictional waters is identified in MM BIO-6. Areas of temporarily impacted sensitive vegetation communities on site shall be returned to similar conditions that existed prior to grading and/or ground-disturbing activities. Additional unimpacted areas on the Project site that support California annual non-native grassland may be enhanced to support existing sensitive native vegetation communities. The CRP shall include restoration of the following habitats:

Upland Woodlands. Impacted areas of upland woodland (i.e. coast live oak woodland and California walnut grove woodland) shall be created/restored within and adjacent to the same on-site areas that the woodland currently existed prior to Project implementation, as well as other areas deemed to have appropriate soils and topography for successful establishment. Prior to vegetation removal activities, native acorns/nuts shall be collected. Understory areas shall be revegetated with a diversity of locallycollected seeds. Temporary irrigation shall be established and maintained, with irrigation suspensions in times of rainfall. Successful establishment of the woodland shall be determined only after removal of irrigation system and confirmed ability of the woodland to survive in the absence of irrigation. Mitigation for impacts to woodlands shall be implemented at a ratio of no less than 3:1 and shall be accomplished through a combination of on-site replacement and enhancement, on-site preservation, and off-site acquisition and/or mitigation bank credits. If feasible, woodlands would be created/restored at a minimum of 1:1 on-site, with the goal of increasing on-site restoration beyond 1:1.

Sagebrush Scrub. Impacted areas of California sagebrush scrub shall be created within and adjacent to the same on-site areas that the scrub currently exist, as well as other areas deemed to have appropriate soils and topography for successful establishment. Prior to grading activities, native and locally collected seeds shall be collected be planted on site within the mitigation areas. Irrigation shall be provided, as necessary, to assure establishment of the scrub. Based upon the disturbed, low quality nature of the existing California sagebrush scrub on site, mitigation of scrub shall be implemented at a Item #8. Page 165
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 230

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-7 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
ratio of no less than 1:1 and shall be accomplished through a combination of on-site replacement and enhancement, on-site preservation, and off-site acquisition and/or mitigation bank credits.

The Project has the potential to
result indirect impacts to sensitive
vegetation communities.

Monitoring. A qualified biologist, subject to the City’s approval, shall be present during initial grounddisturbing activities within the Project site to ensure that Project activities stay within the demarcated limits.

The Project has the potential to
result direct and indirect impacts
to jurisdictional waters.

MM-BIO-6
Mitigation for direct impacts to jurisdictional waters shall be implemented through on-site enhancement of remaining jurisdictional waters and/or off-site acquisition, program funding, and/or mitigation bank credits. Mitigation ratios for each type of jurisdictional waters is shown in Table 3.4-4, Mitigation for Direct Impacts to Potential Jurisdictional Waters.
*Parks and ornamental plantings, disturbed habitat, and developed-concrete channel On-site Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) for on-site mitigation for temporary and permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources (including coast live oak woodlands associated with the drainages), which shall include habitat enhancement and creation activities. The HMMP shall at a minimum include a feasible implementation structure, salvage/seeding details, invasive species eradication methods, irrigation system and schedule, a monitoring schedule, performance Jurisdictional Waters Type
Direct
Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
(acres)
USACE waters of the United
States

0.38 1:1 0.38
RWQCB waters of the state 0.50 1:1 0.50
CDFW streambed and bank,
with coast live oak woodland

1.77 3:1 5.31
CDFW streambed and bank,
with non-riparian habitat*

0.28 1:1 0.28
Item #8. Page 166
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 231

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-8 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
standard of success, estimated costs, and identification of responsible entities. The HMMP shall include restoration of the following habitats associated with the potential CDFW jurisdictional limits:

Riparian Coast Live Oak Woodland. Impacted areas of coast live oak woodland within the CDFW jurisdictional limits shall be created/restored within and adjacent to the same on-site areas that the woodland currently existed prior to Project implementation, as well as other areas deemed to have appropriate soils and topography for successful establishment. Prior to vegetation removal activities, native acorns/nuts shall be collected. Understory areas shall be revegetated with a diversity of locallycollected seeds. Temporary irrigation shall be established and maintained, with irrigation suspensions in times of rainfall. Successful establishment of the woodland shall be determined only after removal of irrigation system and confirmed ability of the woodland to survive in the absence of irrigation. If feasible, woodlands would be created/restored at a minimum of 1:1 on-site, with the goal of increasing on-site restoration beyond 1:1.

Project has the potential to result
in direct impacts to trees resulting
from conflicts with the tree
preservation policy or
ordinance.

MM-BIO-7
On-site Mitigation. Mitigation for City protected trees shall consider and overlap with any on-site compensation for special-status vegetation communities (MM-BIO-4 and MM-BIO-5) and jurisdictional waters (MM-BIO-6). Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any earthwork on the Project site, a qualified arborist shall conduct a tree survey to confirm previous tree inventory data points and finalize the tree count for the purposes of replacement and shall prepare a protected Tree Planting And Maintenance Plan. The Plan shall be developed by a qualified arborist or landscape architect, subject to the City’s approval, and it shall identify tree planting locations, planting stock requirements, planting techniques, maintenance standards, tree protection standards, tree survival criteria, monitoring protocols, and reporting standards. Minimum tree replacement to removal ratios shall be no less than the following for each trees diameter at breast height (dbh) in accordance with the City’s 2018 Urban Forestry Manual:

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-9 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
Other 10”-15” dbh 1:1 replacement
Other 16”-36” dbh 1:1 replacement
Other 37”-48” dbh 2:1 replacement
Other 49”-60” dbh 3:1 replacement
Other 61” dbh and up 5:1 replacement
The plan will discuss and provide actions to prevent and minimize the spread of invasive tree diseases, pests, and pathogens including, but not limited to sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum), thousand canker fungus (Geosmithia morbida), polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea spp.), and goldspotted oak borer (Agrilus auroguttatus). To avoid the spread of infectious tree pests and diseases, the plan will indicate that infected trees should not be transported from a Project site without first being treated using best available management practices. The plan shall be approved by the City prior to implementation.

Off-site Mitigation. For protected trees that are not replaced on-site, an in-lieu fee for future tree replacement shall be executed per the Condition of Approval and approved by the City Arborist.collected and deposited into a tree replacement fund. The in-lieu fee is based on the City’s cost to replant and set by City resolution.

Project has the potential to result
in indirect impacts to trees
resulting from conflicts with the
tree preservation policy or
ordinance.

An International Society of Arboriculture Certified arborist shall monitor any construction activity taking place within or near to the TPZ and shall submit a Construction Observation letter to the City for approval, prior to final inspection, summarizing the results of the monitoring activity and resulting health of trees designated for preservation on-site.

Cultural Resources
Archaeological resources could
potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-CUL-1. In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, the construction contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within 100 feet of the discovery and shall retain a qualified archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards. Construction activities may continue in other areas outside of the designated protection zone, which shall be delineated with cones, flagging, or fencing. The archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether the resource uncovered is a “Tribal Cultural Resources” pursuant to Section 21074 of the California Public Resources Code, or a “unique Item #8. Page 168
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 233

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-10 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
archaeological resource” pursuant to Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code or a “historical resource” pursuant to Section 15064.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries, could potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-CUL-2. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the Los Angeles County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery.

No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, s/he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 48 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains.

Geology and Soils
The Project has the potential to
directly or indirectly cause
substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving seismic ground
shaking.

MM-GEO-1. At the time of submittal of the first plan check, the Project Applicant shall provide an additional, detailed site-specific geologic evaluation of the Project site, supporting the proposed grading design to the City for review. The recommendations of the Project-specific Preliminary Reports of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by G.A. Nicoll and Associates, Inc. 2013 and 2016 shall be applied to the final Project designs, as applicable, and shall be refined, as necessary. In summary, preliminary recommendations to be incorporated into the Project design may include, but are not limited to: (1) removal of loose younger alluvium, existing fill, colluvium, and soil slumps and over-excavation in areas of transition to bedrock and of large trees to be removed; (2) re-use of rock materials scattered in the fill materials, as appropriate; (3) reworking/compaction of the soils to achieve 85-90% relative compaction; (4) protections of concrete and metal pipes from any high-sulphate bedrock, as appropriate; (5) buttressing of cut slopes and removal of any slump areas, finished with the sufficient added fill to buttress the remaining material; (6) slope stabilization fills and/or keys near the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) pipeline, cut slopes, and small landslide area; (7) addition of fines to the fill mixture and/or geofabric stabilization for fill slopes and buttress fills; (8) a system of subdrains and outlets to address accumulations of subsurface water from rainfall and irrigation; and (9) positive surface gradients and other drainage provisions to replace the natural flow of surface water through the canyons, with mid-slope drain and down drains for slopes of 25 feet or higher.

The Project has the potential to be
located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of
MM-GEO-2. Prior to the approval of the Final Plans for the proposed Project, the Project Applicant shall provide the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) with the following documents: the Tentative Tract Map; soils report and settlement analysis; laboratory testing results; detailed designs of the required secondary containment system for non-potable utilities landscaping plans; and any other supporting documents related to development within the MWD easement, including details of the Item #8. Page 169
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 234

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-11 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
the project, and potentially result
in collapse.
retaining wall, foundations, and supporting calculations, shall be stamped and signed and submitted for MWD’s review and written approval.

The Tentative Tract Map shall identify the following features and requirements:
• Gates or removable bollards, capable of accommodating MWD’s locks, shall be installed at the location of the driveway approach to the Upper Feeder to prevent unauthorized entry to MWD’s right-of-way;
• Bollards shall be placed on the south side of City of Glendora / LA County Flood Control’s maintenance road to protect MWD’s 10-foot-inside-diameter air vent shaft (at Station 2280+51) from damage;
• Building structures of any kind and trees are prohibited within the limits of the MWD easement. • Any intrusion, modification, or destruction of any aspect of this Monrovia No. 1 tunnel segment of the MWD Upper Feeder pipeline or the hatch are prohibited.

The Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CCRs) of the Homeowner’s Association shall require the written notification of the property owners of Lots 7, 8, and 9 that are located immediately northeast of the Upper Feeder pipeline and right-of-way, that access to the lots may become unavailable at any time, for a period of time, in the event that excavation of the pipeline becomes necessary for maintenance, repair, replacement, or the addition of another pipeline. The CCRs of the Homeowner’s Association shall also require that all property owners of land with the MWD easement shall be notified that structures of any kind and trees are prohibited within the limits of the MWD easement.

Paleontological resources could
potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-GEO-3. Prior to commencement of any grading activity on-site, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist per the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) (2010) guidelines, subject to the review and approval of the City’s Building Official, or designee. The paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the proposed Project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the guidelines of the SVP and should outline requirements for preconstruction meeting attendance and worker environmental awareness training, where monitoring is required within the Project area based on construction plans and/or geotechnical reports, procedures for adequate paleontological monitoring and discoveries treatment, and paleontological methods (including sediment sampling for microvertebrate fossils), reporting, and collections management. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and a paleontological monitor shall be on-site during all rough grading and other significant ground-disturbing activities in previously undisturbed, finegrained older Quaternary alluvial fan deposits. These deposits may be encountered at depths as shallow as 5-10 feet below ground surface. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontological monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find.

Noise
The Project could result in a
substantial temporary increase in
ambient noise levels in the vicinity
of the Project in excess of
standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance.

MM-NOI-1. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit construction plans and/or specifications to the City of Glendora Planning Division demonstrating compliance with the following:
• The location and design of a temporary noise barrier between the construction area and the adjacent residences. Given that a retaining wall is proposed between the project access road and the adjoining residential properties, said retaining wall, constructed as part of the proposed Project, shall be erected immediately as the first component of construction, to function as a noise barrier. As necessary, temporary height extensions to the retaining wall to Item #8. Page 170
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 235

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-12 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
achieve a minimum height of 12 feet from the wall base on the project side to the top of the barrier, shall be added and maintained for the duration of construction. If immediate installation of the boundary retaining wall is not feasible for construction progression, then a temporary barrier shall be installed in the eventual location of the retaining wall. The temporary noise barrier or temporary height extension of the retaining wall to achieve a 12-foot-high noise control barrier shall be constructed with plywood that is at least ½ inch thick or with another material that creates a noise transmission loss of at least 20 dBA. • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. Enforcement shall be accomplished by random field inspections by applicant personnel during construction activities, to the satisfaction of the City. • Construction noise reduction methods such as shutting off idling equipment, maximizing the distance between construction equipment staging areas and adjacent residences, and use of electric air compressors and similar power tools, rather than diesel equipment, shall be used where feasible.
• During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from or shielded from sensitive receptors. • Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow surrounding property owners to contact the job superintendent if necessary. In the event the City of Glendora receives a complaint, appropriate corrective actions shall be implemented and a report of the action provided to the reporting party.

Transportation
The Project could substantially
increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature or
incompatible uses.

MM-TRAF-1. Prior to the start of any Project-related construction, the Applicant shall develop and implement a Project-specific Traffic Control Plan (TCP). At a minimum, the TCP shall require the use of a flagman at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Palm Drive throughout all phases of construction activity that require heavy truck traffic through the intersection. The TCP shall be stamped and signed by a licensed Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer in the State of California. The TCP shall be prepared in accordance with applicable regulations and standards, including the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), and approved by all regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the work locations shown in the TCP, including the City of Glendora.

The Project could substantially
increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature or
incompatible uses.

MM-TRAF-2. Prior to issuance of a occupancy permit for any habitable structures on any Project site, the Applicant shall complete the following improvements to the Grand Avenue and Palm Drive intersection and immediate vicinity, as provided by the City of Glendora in the 2020 Grand Avenue/Palm Drive Intersection Safety Assessment, to the satisfaction of the City:
(1) Relocate existing stop sign and street name sign onto a new taller post. The bottom section of the stop sign is currently 5.5 feet above sidewalk grade. Per the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the vertical clearance of all signs should be 7 feet minimum.
(2) Repaint red curb on the west side of Grand Avenue where the street narrows to 18 feet in width.
(3) Upgrade the existing wood pole streetlight at the intersection to LED. (4) Relocate 25 mph speed limit sign onto the existing streetlight. Currently, the speed limit sign is obscured behind the street light pole. Remove signpost. (5) Ensure sidewalk fronting the development are cleared from trees/debris. Include curb ramps on the north and south sides of the intersection. (6) Add a 50-foot red curb on the south side of Palm Drive starting at Item #8. Page 171
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 236

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-13 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
(7) Repaint stop legend and stop bar.

Tribal Cultural Resources
Tribal Cultural Resources could
potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-TCR-1. Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant. The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission IndiansKizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.

Tribal Cultural Resources could
potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-TRC-2. Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and unique archaeological resources.

Tribal Cultural Resources could
potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-TRC-3. Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources.

Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.

Native American Human Remains
and Associated Funerary Objects
could potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-TCR-4. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects.

Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.

Item #8. Page 172
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 237

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-14 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
Native American Human Remains
and Associated Funerary Objects
could potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD).

Native American Human Remains
and Associated Funerary Objects
could potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

MM-TCR-6. Kizh-Gabrieleño Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains. If the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects.

Native American Human Remains
and Associated Funerary Objects
could potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within 6 months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.

Native American Human Remains
and Associated Funerary Objects
could potentially be
discovered/unearthed during
Project construction.

Item #8. Page 173
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 238

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-15 December 2022
Table 1.5-1
Mitigation Measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
Utilities and Service Systems
The project would require the
construction of new water
facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects.

MM-UTL-1. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the Project Applicant shall provide the City with payment of the Project’s fair-share contribution to the replacement of the Zone 11 hydro-pneumatic system (pumps, tank, and controls) to provide a reliable water delivery system for Zone 11 homes. The replacement facilities shall be fully operational and all required access easements for the construction and long-term maintenance of the off-site water lines shall be in place prior to the occupancy of the Lots 2 and 3.

MM-UTL-2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide the City with documentation that confirms the review and approval of the Project’s fire flow requirements and the locations of new fire hydrants by Los Angeles County Fire Department.

Item #8. Page 174
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 239

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-16 December 2022
Environmental Checklist Form

1. Project Title: Grand Estates Residential Subdivision Project

2. Lead agency name and
address:

City of Glendora
Planning Division
116 East Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, California 91741

3. Contact person and phone
number:

Mark Carnahan, City Planner
626.914.8253

4. Project location: 950 North Silent Ranch Drive
Glendora, California 91741

5. Project sponsor’s name and
address:

Dreamland Investments, LLC
21491 Ferrero Parkway
City of Industry CA 91789

6. General plan designation: Low Density and Conservation Open Space

7. Zoning: Single-family estate (E7-20,000) and open space – natural (OSN)

8. Description of project: The 11-acre southern section of the Project site would be developed with residential uses and the 16-acre northern section of the site would remain as open space, with the exception of reconstructed flood control facilities. On the southern section, the Project involves development of 13 new single-family residential lots, one with an existing single-family residence and one lot for the Private Streets, for a total of 14 lots. The project’s newgated community would include 12 single-family custom homes constructed on the new residential lots.

Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 5 through 14 would be single-family residential lots, and Lot 4 would be the Private Streets. The existing single-family residence would remain in place on Lot 1. Site includes APN 8684-045-004.

9. Surrounding land uses and
setting:

To the north of the Project site are mountainous, undeveloped areas within the northern portion of the City and the Angeles National Forest. To the east are hillside areas that are sparsely developed with rural residences. The areas south and southwest are developed with single-family residential neighborhoods. To the west are single-family residences, undeveloped hillside areas, and utility and flood control infrastructure, consisting of a concrete drainage system that leads out of the San Gabriel Mountains.

10. Other public agencies whose
approval is required:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Metropolitan Water District; Los Angeles County Flood Control District; State Water Resources Control Board; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles County Fire Department.

11. Have California Native
American tribes traditionally
and culturally affiliated with
the project area requested
consultation pursuant to
Public Resources Code
section 21080.3.1?
Tribes have been consulted. See Section 3.18.

Item #8. Page 175
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 240

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-17 December 2022
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date
Item #8. Page 176
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 241

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-18 December 2022
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required.

4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier Analyses,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced).

5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.

6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.

7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.

8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.

Item #8. Page 177
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 242

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
1-19 December 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item #8. Page 178
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 243
8375
2-1 December 2022
2 Project Setting and Description

2.1 Project Location
As shown in Figure 2-1, Regional Location and Project Vicinity, the Project site is located in the City of Glendora (City), within the County of Los Angeles (County). The Project site is Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 8684-045-004 in the northern, hillside portion of the City, within the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and just south of the Angeles National Forest (ANF) boundaries. At a regional context, the site is located north of Interstate 210 (I-210), east of State Route (SR) 39, and west of SR-57. At a local context, the site is located in the northern section of the City, near the northern terminus of Grand Avenue, north of Palm Drive, east of North Silent Ranch Drive, and west of Rainbow Drive. Regional access to the Project site is via I-210, exiting Grand Avenue.

2.2 Existing Conditions and Setting

2.2.1 On-Site Conditions
The Project site is located approximately 35 miles from the Pacific Ocean. On-site elevations range from 960 feet above mean sea level (amsl) to 1,170 feet amsl. The southern approximately 11 acres of the site, which would be developed with residential land uses, is slightly south sloping and has a moderate to flat grade.

Elevations across the southern portion of the site range from 960 to 1,025 amsl. The northern approximately 16 acres, which are designated as preserved open space, contain moderate to steep slopes with elevations ranging from 1,026 feet to 1,170 feet amsl.

The proposed Project site is designated in the City’s General Plan as Low Density and Conservation Open Space and the zoning for the Project site is Single-family estate (E7-20,000) and open space – natural (OSN).

Access to the Project site is provided via one unpaved driveway/ingress road that stems from the terminus of Grand Avenue. Access to the existing residence is provided via the off-site Silent Ranch Drive cul-de-sac adjacent to the southwestern edge of the Project site boundary. Figure 2-2, Aerial View and Existing On-Site Features, shows an aerial view of the Project site and immediately surrounding areas.

As shown on Figure 2-2, the Project site is generally undeveloped and vegetated, with the exception of a single-family residence located in the southwestern portion of the site, remnant structures from previous uses on the site, and three flood control/debris check dam structures. Development has previously occurred on the Project site, which was associated with the former Rancho Los Alisos and the Camp Aventura uses.

Around 1907, Charles Silent (lawyer, judge, and a real estate speculator in Los Angeles) began to develop the Rancho Los Alisos property as a landscaped park, with orchards, rancho-style housing with thatched roofing, fountains, and rock-lined paths. A portion of the Monrovia Tunnel No. 1 section of the 30-mile Upper Feeder Aqueduct, which is owned and operated by MWD, was developed through the property in 1936. In 1968 and 1969, a fire and mudslide prompted the construction of LACFCD crib dams in the Project site to control debris flows. Also on the Project site, the Camp Aventura Girl Scout Camp was opened in 1955. The area was cleared of orchards and four buildings and 12 tent pads were constructed, as well as planted trees and other vegetation around the camp. The original Rancho Los Alisos-era ranch house and outbuildings were all removed by 1968. The Girl Scout Camp was demolished beginning in 1974 and a new residence was built at the former Ranch Los Alisos house site in 1976, with construction completed in 1980. All constructed features, including the general locations of remnant structures (e.g., rock pool, drinking fountain, concrete stairs, rock retaining walls and steps, concrete hatch for MWD Upper Feeder Pipeline, and a restroom building) are identified on Figure 2-2.

Item #8. Page 179
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 244

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-2 December 2022
The Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR) prepared for this Project (Appendix B-1) found that the approximately 27-acre Project site is comprised of annual non-native grasslands (6.42 acres), coast live oak woodland (10.87 acres), disturbed sagebrush scrub (2.24 acres), ornamental/landscape areas (2.41 acres), urban/developed areas (0.28-acre), and California walnut groves (1.4-acre). The non-native grassland and disturbed California sagebrush scrub habitat occurs generally along the ridges of the mountains. Three main drainages are located within the Project site, which are currently intercepted by three flood control/debris check dam structures. However, due to accumulated sediment and lack of maintenance, these structures are not functioning to retain debris or flood flows. Also, a total of 835 trees were surveyed and mapped within the Project site. According to the August 2020 tree survey conducted by a certified arborist, approximately 173 trees surveyed were in extremely poor health (see Grand Estates Tree Information Matrix within Appendix B-1 for further details regarding the health of existing trees surveyed). As stated in the BRTR, of the 835 trees surveyed, 639 were determined by a certified arborist and the City’s Department of Public Works to have “protected” status per the City’s Urban Forestry Manual (i.e., living, on-site, trees with trunk diameters greater than or equal to 8 inches) (City of Glendora 2018; 2022a; Appendix B-1; Appendix B-2). Of the 639 protected status trees, 437 were identified as being native to the region, including 28 California black walnut, 10 California sycamore, 398 coast live oak, and 1 toyon City (CNPS 2022; Appendix B-1). An additional 202 nonnative or non-natural native species (native to California but planted for ornamental landscaping) were identified (CNPS 2022; Appendix B-1).

2.2.2 Surrounding Land Uses
The City is generally surrounded by unincorporated County to the north and the cities of San Dimas to the east, Covina to the south, and Azusa to the west. The City is primarily developed with residential uses, as well as some commercial/industrial uses. The northern and northeastern portions of the City encompass hillside areas at the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, which are generally developed with rural/low-density residences, and steeper areas remain open space.

To the north of the Project site are mountainous, undeveloped areas within the northern portion of the City. The Project site is approximately 0.31-mile southeast of the ANF boundary. To the east of the Project site are hillside areas that are sparsely developed with rural residences designated as “Hillside Very Low Density” in the City’s General Plan. The areas south and southwest of the Project site are developed with single-family residential neighborhoods. Approximately 0.15-mile southwest of the Project site is St. Lucy’s Priory High School. To the southwest of the Project site is also a small unincorporated area of the County, which is surrounded by the City.

This area is primarily developed with single-family residences. To the west of the Project site are single-family residences, undeveloped hillside areas within the City, and utility and flood control infrastructure, consisting of a concrete drainage system that leads out of the San Gabriel Mountains. To the west of the Project site is the Church of the Open Door, located approximately 0.15-mile west of the Project site.

Several County-designated Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) are located within proximity to the Project site.

The San Gabriel Canyon SEA is located approximately 0.35-mile northwest of the Project site. The East San Gabriel Valley SEA, which includes South Hills Park and surrounding undeveloped lands within the City, is located approximately 2 miles southeast of the Project site. The County-designated SEAs are not applicable to the Project site or any required entitlements for the development of the property.

2.2.3 Flood Control Facility Improvements
The northern 16 acres of the Project site are zoned open space and would be designated as a “building restriction area.” No habitable structures would be constructed within the northern section of the Project site, Item #8. Page 180
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 245

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-3 December 2022
except for the proposed flood/debris control facilities, which includes the West Basin (elevated inlet “B”), Middle Basin (elevated inlet “C”), and East Basin (debris basin “D”). The LACFCD determined that with implementation of the proposed Project, potential debris flows during rain events from the undeveloped hillside areas to the north of the site could not be adequately captured by the existing debris control structures, which are filled to capacity and no longer function as intended. Therefore, with implementation of the proposed Project, the existing three flood control/debris check dam structures would be removed, and larger flood/debris control facilities would be constructed within generally the same location. This would protect the new residential development as well as other homes downslope from safety hazards associated with flooding and debris flow.

Figure 2-4a, Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, includes an overview of the engineering design of the debris basin spillways. Figure 2-4b, Cross-Sections of TTM No. 72413, includes a cross-section view of the debris basin spillways to be constructed in the West Basin, Middle Basin, and East Basin. Each spillway inlet would be approximately 5 feet tall, include a debris barrier rack to filter out large woody debris, and connect to a 36- inch reinforced concrete pipeline that would connect to the storm drain system in the residential area below.

As depicted on Figures 2-4a and 2-4b, an asphalt maintenance access road would be constructed to the north of the residential development and to the south of the inlets and the debris basin, to allow maintenance vehicles to access the drainage facilities. The access road would be paved and would be 20 feet wide with 40- foot diameter turn-arounds to allow for vehicular and maintenance equipment site ingress/egress and connect to the proposed Private Streets. Ramps would be constructed from the access roads to the top of the earthen debris basins to allow for vehicle access.

2.3 Project Description

2.3.1 Residential Lots and Private Streets
The proposed Project would develop 12 new graded pads and two Private Streets in the southern section of the Project site. Each residential lot would accommodate custom home development at a future date. One existing home and its associated new residential lot are also included within the Project site boundaries.

Although the ultimate timing and design of each residential home would occur at an unknown future date subject to economic market conditions and the buyer’s preferences, for the purposes of the impact evaluation within this IS/MND, the construction and long-term occupancy of the Project site is assumed and analyzed.

The existing single-family residence in the southwestern corner of the Project site would remain in place. As such, upon buildout, the Project site is expected to support a total of 13 residences, all of which would be located within the 11-acre southern section of the Project site, which is zoned for single-family residential use.

The approximately 11-acre southern section of the Project site would be developed with residential uses and the approximately 16-acre northern section of the site would remain as open space, with the exception of flood control improvements (see Section 2.3.2 below). Figure 2-3, Site Plan, depicts the locations of Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 5 through 14, which would be single-family residential lots, and two Private Streets (Lot 4). The new lots would range in size from approximately 20,000 square feet to 32,000 square feet. The existing singlefamily residence is on an 86,010 square foot lot.

Item #8. Page 181
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 246

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-4 December 2022
As shown on Figure 2-3, the Project site currently contains easements of MWD, SCE, Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone Company of California, and LACFCD. These easements are summarized as follows:
• The MWD easement is shown as Easement “A” and traverses from north to south through the Project site and would remain as-is with Project implementation. This easement contains a portion of the MWD Upper Feeder water supply system and consists of a 10-foot diameter pre-cast reinforced concrete pipe that crosses beneath (subterranean) the Project site, ultimately connecting to the Monrovia No. 1 tunnel approximately 60 feet to the north of the Project site. The tunnel and pipeline are a part of the Colorado River Aqueduct System. No habitable structures would be constructed on the MWD easement.
• The three future LACFCD easements identified as Proposed Easements to the City of Glendora for Flood Control Purposes. “*” encompass three flood control/debris check dam structures, and the concrete drainage channel that traverses southerly through the eastern portion of the site. The boundaries of the existing easements would be abandoned and a new LAFCFD easement (Easement “2”) would be created to encompass the proposed expanded debris/flood control structures and associated maintenance access road.
• The SCE easements are shown as Easements “B”, “C”, and “G”, which would remain as-is with Project implementation.
• The General Telephone Company of California easement is shown as Easement “D”, which would remain as-is with Project implementation.
• The Southern California Gas Company easement is shown as Easement “E”, which would remain asis with Project implementation. • The proposed Easement “1” includes Lot 4, which would be created for Private Street use, and access would be granted to the City and MWD.

Figure 2-4a, Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, shows the proposed site development, including grading contour lines, easements, and proposed utility infrastructure. All utility infrastructure would be placed underground.

Figure 2.4b, Cross-Sections of TTM No. 72413, shows the existing and proposed elevation changes associated with each cross-section on Figure 2-4a, including the following:
• Section A-A crosses west to east through Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. As shown, Lots 3, 4, and 5 would require between approximately 10 to 30 feet of fill material to establish the finished grade elevations. • Section B-B crosses northwest to southeast through the West Basin and Lots 1, 2, and 4. As shown, between the debris basin maintenance access road and Lot 2, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required. The difference in elevation between the edge of the Private Street and the existing Lot 1 driveway would be approximately 17 feet.
• Section C-C crosses north to south through the Middle Basin and Lots 4 and 5. As shown, between the debris basin crest slope and Lot 5, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required. Additionally, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required between the Private Street and the Tentative Tract Map (TTM) boundary. The Middle Basin would require up to 30 feet of overexcavation and recompaction to establish the finished grade elevations. • Section D-D crosses northwest to southeast through Lots 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, and 13. As shown, between the hillside slope and Lot 6, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required. • Section E-E crosses north to south through the East Basin and Lots 8, 9, 11, 12, 13 and 14. As shown, between the hillside slope and Lot 8, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required.

Additionally, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required between Lot 14 and the Tract Item #8. Page 182
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 247

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-5 December 2022
boundary. The East Basin would require up to 35 feet of overexcavation and recompaction to establish the finished grade elevations.
• Sections F-F and G-G cross north to south through the Private Street (Lot 4) and the proposed 6-foottall adjacent retaining wall. As shown a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall is required adjacent to the Private Street.
• Sections H-H crosses northwest to southeast through the MWD easement and Lots 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, and 12. This cross-section shows the alignment of the subterranean MWD pipeline and its depth below the existing surface as well as the proposed ground surface. As shown, between the hillside slope and Lot 6, a maximum 6-foot-tall retaining wall would be required and would have a natural appearance • Sections I-I, J-J, and K-K cross west to east through the MWD easement and Lots 6 & 7, 9 & 10, and 11, respectively. These cross-sections show the amount of additional fill material would be required over the MWD easement at the residential lots.

As shown on Figures 2-4a and 2-4b and described above, the main Private Street would be constructed along the southeastern edge of the Project site with an additional smaller street splitting off to the northeast midway, providing access to each residential lot. The streets would be privately held by the HOA, which would be established prior to occupancy of the first new custom home. More specifically, the CCRs of the HOA would be approved prior to grading so that all hydroseeding, watering, maintenance of the HOA areas and the habitat restoration areas; additional mitigation requirements; and other conditions or approvals would be established prior to construction of the proposed Project. The City would impose this as a condition of approval of the TTM.

Entrance to the Project site would be gated, with a gate controller and turn-around located within the Private Street adjacent to Lots 13 and 14.

The new custom homes would be constructed in accordance with the City’s zoning requirements for the singlefamily estate (E-7) zone. The maximum floor-area-ratio (FAR) for the E-7 zone is 35% FAR (The allowable FAR does not include a detached garage, up to 400 square feet in size). Table 2.3-1, Maximum Allowable Home Sizes, shows the maximum allowable home size for each proposed lot, with an additional 400 square feet to account for a garage. Based on zoning requirements, each home could be a maximum of two stories in height and would not be allowed to exceed 25 feet in height.

Table 2.3-1
Maximum Allowable Home Sizes
Lot Number
Lot size
(square feet)
Maximum allowable home size plus a 400-square foot garage (square feet)*
1 86,010 Existing home to remain in place
2 31,195 11,318
3 21,552 7,943
4 88,923 Private streets
5 24,461 8,961
6 32,005 11,602
7 21,948 8,082
8 29,121 10,592
9 20,000 7,400
10 20,898 7,714
11 31,291 11,352
12 24,645 9,026
13 20,010 7,404
Item #8. Page 183
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 248

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-6 December 2022
Table 2.3-1
Maximum Allowable Home Sizes
Lot Number
Lot size
(square feet)
Maximum allowable home size plus a 400-square foot garage (square feet)*
14 20,014 7,405
Total new home construction 108,799
Notes: *Home sizes have been rounded to the nearest whole number.

Source: Project Site Plans (Bledsoe Giron 2021)

2.3.2 Landscape and Fuel Modification Improvements
Figure 2-5, Preliminary Fuel Modification Plan, which has been reviewed and stamped in November 2021 by the Los Angeles County Fire Department’s (LACFD) Fuel Modification Unit,1 and Appendix B-2, Draft Architectural Landscape Plans and Tree Removals, provide an overview of the anticipated landscaping along the Private Streets and within each residential lot. As shown, retaining walls would be screened by shrubbery.

Anticipated landscape trees include canyon live oak, black walnut, Brisbane box, hollyleaf cherry, and Chinese pistache. All on-site lots would be equipped with landscaping irrigation. As depicted on Figure 2-4a, Tentative Tract Map No. 72413, a 6-foot masonry screen wall would be constructed on the eastern edge of the TTM, which would serve as aesthetic fencing but also as wildfire protection between the Project site and the adjacent residential uses to the east.

Figure 2-4a also depicts areas adjacent to the proposed debris basins that would be subject to minimal grading/grooming to remove loose surface materials and reduce loose debris from running off into the debris basin facilities, as required by the LACFCD. Upon completion of the proposed Project, the affected slopes would be hydroseeded with native seeds to facilitate the reestablishment of vegetative cover.

A total of 835 trees were identified within the Project site, approximately 651 trees of which would be removed to allow for site development.2 As set forth in the City’s Urban Forestry Manual and Section 20.08.130 (6), Preservation of Existing Trees, of the City’s Municipal Code, the Project would be required to plant (or submit payment of in-lieu fees for) a minimum of 879 replacement trees to mitigate for the proposed tree removals (City of Glendora 2018).
1 The Fuel Modification Unit is a special unit within the Forestry Division of the Los Angeles County Fire Department responsible for the approval of a fuel modification plan for structures located in Fire Hazard Severity Zones. 2 Per the City’s Urban Forestry Manual (City of Glendora 2018), only removals of protected status trees require replacement (i.e., living trees with a trunk diameter of 8 or more inches). As such, to show the total number of replacement trees required, Appendix B-2, Draft Architectural Landscape Plans and Tree Removals, Sheet L-2, shows that the Project would remove 455 protected status trees. However, in total, the August 2020 tree survey conducted by a certified Dudek arborist observed a total of 835 trees within the survey area (see to the 2020 Grand Estates Tree Information Matrix provided within Appendix B-1 of this IS/MND for a list of all trees surveyed). Of these 835 existing trees, 639 were determined by the City to have protected status.

As shown in Appendix B-2, Sheet L-2.2, of the 639 protected trees, the Project would preserve 184. The Project would not preserve any unprotected status trees (i.e., trees that are not listed on Sheets L-2.1 or L-2.2 of the Draft Architectural Landscape Plans and Tree Removals). As the total number of trees surveyed was 835, the total number of trees removed would be approximately 651651 (835 Total Trees – 184 Trees Preserved = 651651 Trees Removed). Approximately 173 of the trees likely to be removed are noted as dead, mostly dead, or in otherwise poor health per the 2020 Grand Estates Tree Information Matrix (see Appendix B-1).

Item #8. Page 184
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 249

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-7 December 2022

2.3.3 Utilities
Water. The Project would include a 10-inch diameter pipeline looped potable water system feeding the new lots, which would connect from the existing 10-inch pipeline in Palm Drive and from the existing 12-inch pipeline adjacent to the existing off-site hydro pneumatic site. The proposed 10-inch diameter pipeline would have sufficient pressure to also serve the domestic water demands of lots 5 through 14. In Section 3.19, Utilities and Services Systems, Figure 3.19-1, Proposed Water Pipeline System, depicts a proposed alignment for the new water infrastructure, including the required off-site connection to the existing hydropneumatic system. The proposed 10-inch diameter pipeline would not provide the desired pressure for domestic water service to lots 1, 2, and 3; therefore, the existing hydro-pneumatic tank system would provide the desired pressure to these lots, requiring an off-site extension of the water line. The off-site portion of the proposed water pipe extension would be beneath existing paved driveways and would not involve the disturbance of native vegetation. However, the hydro-pneumatic tank system would be replaced by the City. This replacement would occur separate of the proposed Project. In order to ensure adequate water supply to Lots 1, 2, and 3, the City will impose a Condition of Approval on the TTM that these lots, which would be served by the hydro-pneumatic tank system, cannot be occupied prior to completion of this City-sponsored infrastructure improvement.

Sewer. As shown on Figure 2-4a, the proposed Project would construct an 8-inch sewer line beneath the Private Street to serve the new residential lots. The wastewater flow originating from the proposed lots would discharge into an 8-inch existing local sewer line in Palm Drive for conveyance beneath Grand Avenue to the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD) Baseline Trunk Sewer. The proposed Project’s Lot 1 has an existing home, which is connected to the local sewer line in Silent Ranch Drive.

Storm Drain. As shown on Figure 3.10-2, Post-Development Drainage Conditions in Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, a new storm drain system would convey only off-site flows through the Project site from the West Basin, Middle Basin, and East Basin. As shown in Figure 3.10-2, flows in the storm drain would be split with a portion conveyed into the public storm drain system, and the other off-site flows would be conveyed along the historic drainage path by means of a flow return structure. All of the on-site flows would be conveyed by the proposed surface streets along the historical path. Under proposed conditions, the overall outflow from the Project site would be reduced. The split of the storm drain flow into the main storm drain system flow and to the return flow structure would be accomplished utilizing different pipe sizes implemented within a manhole to be located near the property line at Palm Drive.

Off-site Components: The subterranean water, sewer, and storm drain infrastructure are the off-site features required for Project implementation. The trenching required for pipeline installation and connection to subterranean existing utility infrastructure would be within paved roadways/driveways. Storm drain improvements along Palm Drive would require trenching within the existing sidewalk. The sidewalk would be repaved once storm drain improvements are implemented, as a condition of approval for the Project.

2.3.4 Short-Term Construction Activities
Construction of the proposed Project is expected to commence in 2023. The first phases of construction would consist of site preparation and grading. These phases are anticipated to extend from early 2023 to late fall 2023. Figure 2-6, Hillside Slope and Areas of Cut/Fill, depict the earthwork balancing required to develop the Project site. During grading, the total cut is anticipated to be approximately 94,500 cubic yards, and the total fill is anticipated to be approximately 96,800 cubic yards, with 2,300 cubic yards of imported soils required.

Item #8. Page 185
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 250

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-8 December 2022
This includes 73,000 cubic yards of cut materials and 32,000 cubic yards of fill materials within the debris basin infrastructure hillside area, and 21,500 cubic yards of cut materials and 64,800 cubic yards of fill materials within the residential development area. Construction activities are anticipated to occur in one phase and could take place Monday to Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., with no work allowed on Saturdays, Sundays, or federal holidays, with the exception of interior work.

While no home construction is currently planned for the site, construction of custom homes is anticipated to occur on the Project site starting after grading and as the market will bear. In practice, there may be separation between grading of the proposed pads and construction of the future residences. However, in order to study the worst-case construction scenario in terms of environmental impact, the analysis in this IS/MND assumes that home construction would commence directly after completion of the grading phase. The building construction phase would be followed by paving and architectural coating for the homes. Under these assumptions, buildout of the site would occur in late summer 2024.

For purposes of estimating Project-related emissions in Section 3.2, Air Quality and Section 3.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the inputs for the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) assumed that construction of the northern and southern portion of the Project site would commence at the same time in January 2023.

Construction of the Project was input to last approximately 18 months ending June 2024.

For the purposes of the environmental analysis in this document, Project buildout is assumed to entail completion of 12 new custom homes on the Project site, completion of the drainage improvements, and occupation of the 12 new custom homes and the existing on-site residence with homeowners or tenants. Additional construction assumptions and details can be found in Appendix A, CalEEMod Modeling Data Sheets, of this IS/MND.

2.3.5 Long-Term Operational Activities
Operation of the proposed Project would include activities typical of a residential development, such as landscaping maintenance, daily vehicle trips as residents leave and return to their homes, street cleaning for the Private Streets, and maintenance of the three flood/debris control facilities. All of the areas within the proposed LACFCD easement, as shown on Figure 2-3, Site Plan, in the green hatching and identified as Easement “2”, would be subject to regular maintenance activities, including vegetation mowing within the West Basin, Middle Basin, and East Basin, anticipated to occur on an annual basis. Sediment removal from the three flood/debris control facilities is anticipated to occur on an as-needed basis, depending on annual storm flows and requirement to maintain the designed capacity of the facility. Other maintenance activities, including access road maintenance and maintenance of the flood/debris control facilities, would occur as needed by the LACFCD.

The population generated by the proposed Project relies on the conservative assumption that each household would have 4 residents (as opposed to the City-wide average of 3 residents per household). Therefore, the addition of 12 new residential lots with the proposed Project is expected to result in approximately 48 new residents within the City.

Item #8. Page 186
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 251

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-9 December 2022

2.4 Discretionary Actions

2.4.1 City of Glendora
This IS/MND is intended to serve as the primary environmental document pursuant to CEQA for actions associated with the proposed Grand Estates Residential Subdivision Project, including discretionary approvals required to implement the Project. In addition, this IS/MND is the primary reference document for the formulation and implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, in accordance with Section 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The City of Glendora may approve the IS/MND if it finds, on the basis of the whole Project record, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. Discretionary actions subject to City’s review and approval before both the Planning Commission and City Council include, but are not limited to:
• Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 72413
• Approval of Development Plan Review (required for any grading over 150 cubic yards on land with an average slope over 10%)
• Approval of Variance (required for grading into 35% steep slope areas) • Approval of gated community through Development Plan Review • Approval of landscape plan through Development Plan Review • Tree removal permit
• Certification of this IS/MND
Subsequent future discretionary action may be required for a Development Plan Review for the individual custom homes, which may require that a public hearing be held at the Planning Commission. This IS/MND assumes compliance with the City’s development and design standards and is intended to cover all future discretionary actions. However, if it is determined that this IS/MND does not adequately cover the potential impacts of the future residential proposals, subsequent analyses pursuant to CEQA may be required.

2.4.2 Responsible and Trustee Agencies
Table 2.4-1, Responsible and Trustee Agency Approvals, lists all the agencies that are known or expected to have permit or approval authority over the proposed Project. This IS/MND covers all federal, state, local government, and quasi-government approvals that may be needed to construct, implement, or operate the Project, whether or not they are specifically identified in Table 2.4-1 or elsewhere in this IS/MND.

Table 2.4-1
Responsible and Trustee Agency Approvals
Agency Approved/Permit Required Purpose
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Nationwide Permit Allow the discharge of dredge and fill material into “waters of
the United States.”
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB)
Section 401 Water Quality
Certification
Protect water quality within
“waters of the United States.”
Item #8. Page 187
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 252

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
2-10 December 2022
Table 2.4-1
Responsible and Trustee Agency Approvals
Agency Approved/Permit Required Purpose
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Section 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement
Authorize changes to the
natural flow or the bed,
channel, or bank of any river,
stream, or lake and associated
impacts to biological resources.

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) Encroachment Permit Authorize construction activities within the Easement.

Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) Encroachment Permit Authorize construction activities within the Easement.

Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) Fuel Modification Plan Responsible for the approval of a fuel modification plan for
projects located within Fire
Hazard Severity Zones.

Item #8. Page 188
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 253
8375
3-1 December 2022
3 Environmental Impact Analysis

3.1 Aesthetics
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point).

If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. Scenic vistas generally refer to views of expansive open space areas or other natural features, such as mountains, undeveloped hillsides, large natural water bodies, or coastlines. Scenic vistas generally refer to views that are accessible from public vantage points, such as public roadways and parks. The City’s General Plan does not show any officially designated scenic vistas in the City. However, the San Gabriel Mountains and foothills are important scenic resources in the City. The City’s Conservation Open Space land use designation is intended, in part, to protect areas with high scenic value (City of Glendora 2008).

The northern section of the Project site is designated Conservation Open Space. This portion of the Project site is currently undeveloped, with the exception of three debris basin/check dam structures.

Under the proposed Project, drainage improvements would occur in this portion of the Project site, including earthwork and vegetation clearing to accommodate the proposed flood/debris control facilities and maintenance access road, and to minimize future debris flows in the area. The vegetation removal and superficial grading of the hillside area would be a temporary visual impact to the lower hillsides drainage areas within the Project site; however, these areas are not readily visible from any public viewpoints.

The southern portion of the Project site, which is currently developed with one single-family home, would be developed with 12 additional single-family homes and two Private Streets upon Project buildout. The homes would be a maximum of 2 stories in height and various 6-foot-tall retaining walls would be constructed. Conversion of this portion of the Project site from undeveloped land to a residential community would alter the aesthetic of the area.

Item #8. Page 189
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 254

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-2 December 2022
However, views of the Project site from public vantage points are very limited, as shown in Figures 3- 1a, 3-1b, and 3-1c, View Simulations. As shown, views of the mountain ridgelines and the steep slopes leading up to the ridgelines are available from public vantage points in the Project area, including from Grand Avenue, Palm Drive, and Sierra Madre Avenue. However, the southern section of the Project site, which would be graded and developed as part of the proposed Project, would not be prominently visible from nearby public vantage points. Views of this area are fully obstructed or partially obstructed by existing development and landscaping.

As shown in Figure 3-1a, the new entrance to the main Private Street, a stone retaining wall, and the frontage of Lot 14 would be visible from Palm Drive near the intersection with Grand Avenue. This change in view would not hinder views of the mountains and would perhaps open a small view corridor up the Private Street and provide the most accessible view into the Project site and surrounding hillsides. An entrance gate and associated landscaping median would be located near the entrance of the Private Street. Rooftops of some of the homes would be visible, as would the graded areas for the enlarged debris basins. This change in views would be different from the existing condition but would be in line with the type of residential land uses existing currently in the immediately surrounding area.

The future homes would not be tall enough to block or hinder views of the mountains and would be in an appropriate scale and character of the surrounding community.

As shown in Figure 3-1b, the graded areas required for Project implementation would not be visible from the intersection of Grand Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue. As shown on Figure 3-1c, the graded areas required for Project implementation would not be visible from Sierra Madre Avenue near the residential homes the east of Grand Avenue. Although there may be other areas from public viewpoints that could have visual connection to the Project site, intervening distance, structures (existing homes), mature trees, and topography would minimize the visual prominence from any public views in the area.

As such, development of the proposed Project would not substantially affect any existing public views of the San Gabriel Mountains and foothills. Additionally, upon completion of the debris basin construction, the hillside areas would be hydroseeded to re-establish native vegetation and understory (see MM-BIO-4 and MM-BIO-6), and mitigation trees would be planted (see MM-BIO-7), which would further reduce the visual impact to hillsides on the Project site. The Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. SR-2, located approximately 11 miles northwest of the Project site, is the nearest Officially Designated State Scenic Highway (Caltrans 2011). Due to the intervening distance and topography, the Project site would not be prominently visible from SR- 2. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings, within a state scenic highway. No impacts would occur. c) In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is considered to be within a non-urbanized area as it requires the extension of new utility and roadway infrastructure and is generally surrounded by open space hillside areas to the north, east and west. Specifically, the Project site abuts an open space area that eventually leads up to the ANF. To the south, the Project site abuts a single-family residential Item #8. Page 190
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 255

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-3 December 2022
neighborhood that is characterized by one- to two-story homes, paved roads, and landscaping that is dominated by ornamental palm trees and shrubs. Public views of the Project site can be afforded from Palm Drive, Cloverview Drive, and limited views would be available from Grand Avenue.

As discussed above under Threshold 3.1(a), under the proposed Project, the southern portion of the Project site would be developed with 2-story single-family homes and two Private Streets. As such, the visual character and quality of the southern section of the Project site would change from open space to that of a residential neighborhood. While the visual character of the southern section of the site would change, the Project would not cause substantial degradation in visual character or quality of the site or its surroundings. After Project buildout, this portion of the site would be visually consistent with the single-family neighborhoods to the south of the Project site. As illustrated in Figure 3.1-d, View Simulation D, the undeveloped area on the Project site that extends to the east of the existing residence is a vacant, previously disturbed, and underutilized area that is designated for residential uses. The proposed Project would bring public views of this undeveloped area into visual agreement with the existing uses to the south of the site.

The northern portion of the Project site is primarily open space; however, there are three existing debris control and channel stabilization structures in this area. The proposed drainage improvements would involve replacement of these existing structures with two elevated inlets and one debris basin, as well as an access road for maintenance of the new debris containment structures. Aside from the flood/debris control improvements, the northern section of the site would remain open space. The proposed improvements would be consistent with existing flood control uses in the northern section of the Project site, as well as other flood control structures on nearby properties, as shown on Figure 2-1. Furthermore, the improvements would be located in canyons, where the steep portions of the Project site meet the flatter portions that are proposed for development. As such, the drainage improvements would not be visually intrusive. Furthermore, the proposed homes would be constructed south of the drainage improvements and would disrupt or obstruct the visibility of the improvements from the neighborhoods to the south. For these reasons, the proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site or its surroundings. Impacts to the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings would be less than significant.
d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant With Mitigation. With the exception of one single-family home on Lot 1, the Project site contains no artificial lighting or glare because there are no other electrified structures.

Existing light sources are associated with the residence in the southwest corner of the Project site. The residential neighborhoods to the south of the Project site have streetlights. While the Project site and surrounding areas to the south include existing sources of nighttime lighting, the proposed Project would involve an increase in the development intensity on a portion of the Project site and would introduce structures where none currently exist. For example, the new residences would likely have exterior lighting at driveway entrances, lit windows at night, and landscaping lighting. As such, the proposed Project’s lighting would introduce new sources of light where such sources do not currently exist or are very limited.

Lighting is of most concern when it may potentially spill over or trespass from a Project site onto properties. Although there are no architectural designs for the future homes, the lighting design for the proposed Project is expected to be similar to the existing lighting in the residential neighborhoods to the south of the Project site. Furthermore, future homes and associated lighting would be required to be in compliance with the California Building Code, and specifically, Title 24, Part 6, Subchapter 7, Item #8. Page 191
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 256

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-4 December 2022
Low-Rise Residential Buildings, Mandatory Features and Devices, which requires for single-family residences, all lighting attached to the residence or to other buildings on the same lot must be high efficacy and controlled by a motion sensor and photocell or an astronomical time clock.

Additionally, the residences will be subject to the City’s involve design review from the City’s Development Plan Review process, which is anticipated to preclude any lighting designs that would lead to substantial light spillover on the residential properties to the south of the site and/or other adjacent properties.

Glare can be produced during the daytime and is usually associated with reflective building materials, such as glass, stainless steel, and aluminum. While the specific design and materials of the future residences on the Project site are unknown at this time, it is not expected that they would be constructed with highly reflective materials. Materials used for the existing residences to the south of the Project site consist of stucco, earth-tone paints, and wood, with tile or shingle roofs. Most walls and roofs are characterized by earth-tone colors. Glass windows on most existing nearby residences are standard in size and are not especially prominent relative to the rest of the structure. It is anticipated that future homes within the proposed Project site would be held to similar design standards as the nearby developments, through the City’s Development Plan Review process.

Therefore, are not expected to be constructed with highly reflective materials that would potentially create significant sources of daytime glare.

However, in the absence of lighting designs specific to the future homes on the Project site that can be reviewed and confirmed to ensure there would not be substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, MM-AES-1 requires that the homes meet performance standards to eliminate the potential for significant impacts. With implementation of MM-AES-1, impacts associated with a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area would be less than significant.

MM-AES-1 Prior to approval of any residential development applications on Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 5 through 14, the Applicant shall provide a lighting plan to the City for their review and approval to ensure compliance with the following standards:
• All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be installed and operated in conformance with applicable Glendora standards, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 6 (and any successor regulations), and the Uniform Building and Electrical Codes. • All outdoor lights shall be directed, oriented, and shielded to prevent light trespass or glare onto adjacent properties and onto public rights-of-way. • The candlepower of all outdoor lights shall be the minimum required to accomplish the purpose of the light but shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles of illumination at the residential property lines.
• The height of lighting fixtures/poles shall not exceed the maximum permitted building height of the residential zone, and if attached to a single-family residence the lighting shall not exceed the height of the roof eave. • All outdoor lighting fixtures shall complement the overall architecture and design of the typical residential Glendora neighborhood in terms of scale, color, and style.

Item #8. Page 192
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 257

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-5 December 2022

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The California Department of Conservation (DOC) Division of Land Resource Protection (DLRP) works with landowners, local governments, and researchers to conserve California’s farmlands and open spaces (DOC 2022a). The Agricultural Land Mitigation Program, California Farmland Conservancy Program, Williamson Act Contracts, and Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program are all farmland conservations programs currently in effect and administered by the DLRP (DOC 2022a).

The Project site is not located on designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP 2017). Also, there are no existing or ongoing agricultural activities on the Project site. As such, the Project would not result in the conversion of any farmland to non-agricultural use. There would be no impact regarding Project conversion of Primate Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use.

Item #8. Page 193
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 258

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-6 December 2022
b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The Project site is currently zoned for single-family estate (E-7) and open space (OSN), and the Project site is not under a Williamson Act contract (DOC 2022b). Agricultural uses are not listed as a permitted use or a conditionally permitted use in the City’s single-family residential zones (including single-family estate) or in the City’s open space zone. As such, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract, and no impact would occur. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
No Impact. A described under Threshold 3.2(b), the Project site is zoned for residential and open space uses. The proposed Project does not require a zone change and would not alter the single-family estate (E-7) or open space (OSN) zones. The portion of the Project site that is currently designated as open space would not be developed with residences and would remain open space. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning, or cause the rezoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland production land, and no impact would occur.
d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Less Than Significant With Mitigation. As discussed above in Section 2.3.3, Landscape and Fuel Modification Improvements, and further in Section 3.4, Biological Resources of this IS/MND, implementation of the proposed Project would require the removal of trees, as identified in the 2020 Grand Estates Tree Information Matrix located in Appendix B-1. Forest land is defined as land that can support 10% native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits (PRC 12220(g)).

The BRTR found that the approximately 27-acre Project site is comprised of annual non-native grasslands (6.42 acres), coast live oak woodland (10.87 acres), disturbed sagebrush scrub (2.24 acres), ornamental/landscape areas (2.41 acres), urban/developed areas (0.28-acre), and California walnut groves (1.4-acre). As such, approximately 12.27 acres of the Project site consists of coast live oak woodlands and walnut groves, which is approximately 45% of the Project site. Approximately 7.54 acres of this native tree cover is located within the 11-acre portion of the Project site zoned for residential development, which does not allow for the management of forest resources and therefore does not meet the definition of forest land. However, 4.72 acres, is within the 16-acre open space portion of the Project site, which requires land to be left in its natural, wilderness state except for the following uses: riding and hiking trails, picnic and playground areas, flood control structures and facilities, and utility substations and related equipment and structures. The 4.72 acres of woodland area within the OSN zone would be impacted to accommodate the debris/flood control facilities, grooming/grading in the hillside debris production areas, and maintenance road, which constitutes

29.5% of the 16-acre northern portion of the Project site.

However, these impacts would not result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use with implementation of MM-BIO-7, which requires the replacement mitigation for impacted trees on site and MM-BIO-8, which requires assessment of the feasibility of oak tree preservation within the minimal grading/grooming areas.

Item #8. Page 194
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 259

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-7 December 2022
With incorporation of MM-BIO-7 and MM-BIO-8, the proposed Project would not result in the permanent loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use, and no additional mitigation is required.
e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No Impact. As stated above in Section 3.2(c) the Project would not result in the conversion of any farmland to non-agricultural use. The Project site is currently zoned for single-family estate (E-7) and open space (OSN) (City of Glendora 2019). Agricultural uses are not listed as a permitted use or a conditionally permitted use in the City’s single-family residential zones (including E-7) or in the OSN zone (City of Glendora 2022). As discussed in Section 3.2(d), without mitigation, the Project would result in conversation of forestland to non-forest use. However, permitted uses in this area also include flood control structures and facilities, as well as utility substations and related uses. Development of the residential uses within the existing E-7 zone would not directly or indirectly convert farmland to non-agricultural uses or forest land to non-forest use because no zone changes are required for Project implementation. In summary, no impacts would result from the proposed Project due to its location or nature, and would not result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest

3.3 Air Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which includes the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, and all of Orange Country, and is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD administers the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SCAB, which is a comprehensive document outlining an air pollution control program for attaining all Item #8. Page 195
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 260

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-8 December 2022
California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The most recent adopted AQMP is the 2016 AQMP (SCAQMD 2017), which was adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board in March 2017. The 2016 AQMP represents a new approach, focusing on available, proven, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional strategies while seeking to achieve multiple goals in partnership with other entities promoting reductions in greenhouse gases (GHGs) and toxic risk, as well as efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement (SCAQMD 2017).

The purpose of a consistency finding is to determine if a project is inconsistent with the assumptions and objectives of the regional air quality plans, and, thus, if it would interfere with the region’s ability to comply with federal and state air quality standards. The SCAQMD has established criteria for determining consistency with the currently applicable AQMP in Chapter 12, Sections 12.2 and 12.3, in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria are as follows (SCAQMD 1993):

Consistency Criterion No. 1: Whether the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of the ambient air quality standards or interim emission reductions in the AQMP.

Consistency Criterion No. 2: Whether the project would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase.

To address the first criterion regarding the Project’s potential to result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of the ambient air quality standards or interim emission reductions in the AQMP, Projectgenerated criteria air pollutant emissions were estimated and analyzed for significance and are addressed under Section 3.3(b), below. Detailed results of this analysis are included in Appendix A, CalEEMod Modeling Data Sheets. As presented in Section 3.3(b), Project construction and operations would not generate criteria air pollutant emissions that would exceed the respective SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with Consistency Criterion No. 1.

The second criterion regarding the Project’s potential to exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of Project buildout and phase is primarily assessed by determining consistency between the Project’s land use designation and potential to generate population growth.

In general, projects are considered consistent with and would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the AQMP if the growth in socioeconomic factors is consistent with the underlying regional plans used to develop the AQMP. The SCAQMD primarily uses demographic growth forecasts for various socioeconomic categories (e.g., population growth, housing, employment by industry) developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for its Regional Transportation Management Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) (SCAG 2016). The forecasts are based on general plans for cities and counties in the SCAB, for the development of the AQMP emissions inventory (SCAQMD 2017). The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS, and associated Regional Growth Forecast, are generally consistent with local government plans. As discussed in Section 2.0 of this IS/MND, the Project is designated as Low Density and Conservation Open Space under the City’s General Plan. The proposed development and subdivision associated with the Project is all within the low residential portion of the property. The site is zoned as Single-family Estate (E7-20,000) and Open Space – Natural (OSN). The proposed Project is consistent with the existing land use designations and no changes to the land use designations or zoning would be required. Accordingly, the Project is consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS forecasts used in the SCAQMD AQMP development, and therefore consistent with Consistency Criterion No. 2. In summary, based on the considerations presented for the two criteria, impacts relating to the Project’s potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable AQMP would be less than significant.

Item #8. Page 196
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 261

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-9 December 2022
b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less Than Significant Impact. Air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. The nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present development, and the SCAQMD develops and implements plans for future attainment of ambient air quality standards. Based on these considerations, project-level thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants are used in the determination of whether a project’s individual emissions would have a cumulatively considerable contribution on air quality. If a project’s emissions would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds, it would be considered to have a cumulatively considerable contribution. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant (SCAQMD 2003).

A quantitative analysis was conducted to determine whether the proposed Project would result in emissions of criteria air pollutants that may cause exceedances of the NAAQS or CAAQS, or contribute to existing nonattainment area of ambient air quality standards. Criteria air pollutants include Ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 microns (PM10), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microns (PM2.5), and lead. Pollutants that are evaluated herein include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), which are important because they are precursors to O3, as well as CO, sulfur oxide (SOx), PM10, and PM2.5.

Regarding NAAQS and CAAQS attainment status, the SCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for both the federal and state O3 standards as well as the federal and state PM2.5 standards (CARB 2020; EPA 2020). The SCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for State PM10 standards; however, it is designated as an attainment area for the federal PM10 standards. The SCAB is designated as an attainment area for both the federal and State standards for CO, NO2, and SOx. Although the SCAB has been designated as nonattainment area for the federal rolling 3-month average of lead standard, it is designated attainment for the State lead standard.

Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that, where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air districts may be relied upon to determine whether a project would have a significant impact on air quality. The SCAQMD has established Air Quality Significance Thresholds, as revised in April 2019, which set forth quantitative emissions significance thresholds below which a project would not have a significant impact on ambient air quality under project-level and cumulative conditions (SCAQMD 2019). The quantitative air quality analysis provided herein applies the SCAQMD thresholds to determine the potential for the proposed Project to result in a significant impact under CEQA. The SCAQMD mass daily construction thresholds are as follows: 75 pounds per day for VOC, 100 pounds per day for NOx, 550 pounds per day for CO, 150 pounds per day for SOx, 150 pounds per day for PM10, and 55 pounds per day for PM2.5. The following discussion quantitatively evaluates Project-generated construction and operational impacts of the proposed Project.

Construction Emissions
Proposed construction activities would result in the temporary addition of pollutants to the local airbasin caused by on-site sources (i.e., off-road construction equipment, soil disturbance, and VOC offgassing) and off-site sources (i.e., on-road haul trucks, vendor trucks, and worker vehicle trips).

Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity: the specific type of operation; and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. Therefore, such emissions levels can only be approximately estimated with a corresponding uncertainty in precise ambient air quality impacts.

Item #8. Page 197
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 262

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-10 December 2022
The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2020.4.0 was used to estimate emissions from construction of the proposed Project. CalEEMod is a statewide computer model developed in cooperation with air districts throughout the state to quantify criteria air pollutant emissions associated with construction activities from a variety of land use projects, such as residential, commercial, and industrial facilities. CalEEMod input parameters, including the land use type used to represent the Project, size and scale of the Project, construction schedule, and anticipated construction equipment utilization, were based on information provided by the Project Applicant and default model assumptions.

For purposes of conservatively estimating Project emissions in CalEEMod and based on information provided by the Project applicant, data input assumed that construction of the northern and southern portion of the Project site would commence at the same time in January 2023 and would last approximately 18 months, ending in June 2024. It is possible that construction of the 12 residences would happen independently of each other at different times but to consider a reasonable worst-case scenario, construction of all residences was quantified to happen concurrently. The construction phasing schedule and duration, vehicle trip assumptions, and construction equipment mix used for estimating the Project-generated construction emissions are shown in Table 3.3-1, Construction Scenario Assumptions.

Table 3.3-1
Construction Scenario Assumptions
Construction
Phase
Average
Daily
Worker
Trips
Average
Daily
Vendor
Truck
Trips
Total
Haul
Truck
Trips Equipment Quantity
Usage
Hours Start Date Finish Date
Site
Preparation
18 6 0 Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 01/16/2023 01/31/2023
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8
Grading 20 6 270 Excavators 2 8 02/1/2023 02/28/2023
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Scrapers 2 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8
Building
Construction
58 22 0 Crane 1 7 05/01/2023 06/28/2024
Forklifts 3 8
Generators Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7
Welders 1 8
Paving 16 0 0 Pavers 2 8 05/01/2023 05/31/2023
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Architectural
Coating
12 0 0 Air Compressor 1 6 08/01/2023 08/31/2023
Notes: See Appendix A for details.

Internal combustion engines used by construction equipment, trucks, and worker vehicles would result in emissions of VOCs, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would also be generated by entrained dust, which results from the exposure of earth surfaces to wind from the direct disturbance and movement of soil. It is anticipated that approximately 2,300 cubic yards of earth Item #8. Page 198
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 263

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-11 December 2022
working material would be imported during construction. The Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 to control dust emissions during any dust-generating activities. Standard construction practices that would be employed to reduce fugitive dust emissions include watering of the active grading areas two times per day, with additional watering depending on weather conditions.

The application of asphalt pavement would also produce VOC emissions; however, the contractor is required to procure asphalt from a supplier in compliance with the requirements of SCAQMD’s Rules 1108 (Cutback Asphalt) and/or 1108.1 (Emulsified Asphalt). The Project would involve application of architectural coating (e.g., paint and other finishes) for painting of the proposed buildings. The contractor is required to procure architectural coatings from a supplier in compliance with the requirements of SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings).

Estimated maximum daily construction criteria air pollutant emissions from all on-site and off-site emission sources from both facilities is provided in Table 3.3-2, Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions.

Table 3.3-2
Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions
Year
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10a PM2.5a
pounds per day
2023 18.31 36.53 34.54 0.07 10.43 5.80
2024 1.72 14.52 18.96 0.04 1.66 0.86
Maximum Daily Emissions 18.31 36.53 34.54 0.07 10.43 5.80 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: SCAQMD 2019.

Notes: VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District.

See Appendix A for detailed results.

The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod. a These estimates reflect control of fugitive dust (watering two times daily) required by SCAQMD Rule 403 (SCAQMD 2005).

As shown in Table 3.3-2, daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5 during construction.

Operational Emissions
Operation of the Project would produce VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5, emissions associated vehicular traffic, area sources (consumer products, architectural coatings, landscaping equipment), and energy (natural gas, appliances, and space and water heating). CalEEMod was used to estimate daily emissions from all operational source categories for the proposed Project.

On-road vehicular emissions associated with the Project were modeled using default CalEEMod trip generation rates and trip distances. Emissions from energy sources using CalEEMod default values which are consistent with 2019 Title 24 standards for single family residential. CalEEMod default values for landscaping and architectural coating assumptions were also utilized for area source emissions.

Table 3.3-3, Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Emissions, summarizes the average daily mobile, energy, and area emissions of criteria pollutants that would be generated by the development of the Project and how generated emissions compare to the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions (i.e., foreseeable worst case) results from CalEEMod. Details of the emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.

Item #8. Page 199
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 264

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-12 December 2022
Table 3.3-3
Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Emissions
Emission Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
(pounds per day)
Area 1.27 0.18 1.07 <0.01 0.02 0.02
Energy 0.01 0.07 0.03 <0.01 0.01 0.01
Mobile 0.41 0.52 4.67 0.01 1.18 0.32
Total 1.69 0.77 5.78 0.01 1.21 0.34
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, 2019.

Notes: VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter.

Area sources = consumer product use, architectural coatings, and landscape maintenance equipment. Energy sources = natural gas.

Mobile sources = motor vehicles.

See Appendix A for detailed results.

The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod. These emissions reflect operational year 2024. No mitigation was assumed.

As shown in Table 3.3-3, the increase in emissions associated with the operation of the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5. The SCAB has been designated as a federal nonattainment area for O3 and PM2.5 and a State nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. The nonattainment status is the result of cumulative emissions from various sources of air pollutants and their precursors within the SCAB, including motor vehicles, off-road equipment, and commercial and industrial facilities. Proposed construction activities of the Project would generate VOC and NOx emissions (which are precursors to O3) and emissions of PM10 and PM2.5. However, as indicated in Table 3.3-2, Project-generated construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD emission-based significance thresholds for VOC, NOx, PM10, or PM2.5.

Cumulative localized impacts could potentially occur if the Project’s construction were to occur concurrently with another nearby off-site project. To the north of the Project site are mountainous, undeveloped areas within the northern portion of the City and the ANF, which are designated as open space areas. To the east of the Project site are hillside areas that are sparsely developed with rural residences designated as “Hillside Very Low Density” in the City’s General Plan. The areas south and southwest of the Project site are developed with single-family residential neighborhoods and St. Lucy’s Priory High School. To the west of the Project site are single-family residences, undeveloped hillside areas within the City, a utility and flood control infrastructure, and the Church of the Open Door. In summary, surrounding land uses are already developed or are designated as open space areas. There are no other known projects with the potential for construction activity in the vicinity of the Project site and surrounding areas are fully developed or designated for open space; therefore, potential construction impacts associated with two or more simultaneous projects is very unlikely. Additionally, future projects would be subject to CEQA and would require air quality analysis and, where necessary, mitigation. Criteria air pollutant emissions associated with construction activity of future projects would be reduced through implementation of control measures required by the SCAQMD. Cumulative PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would be reduced because all future projects would be subject to SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), which sets forth general and specific requirements for all construction sites in the SCAQMD. Based on the previous considerations, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions of nonattainment area pollutants, and impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Item #8. Page 200
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 265

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-13 December 2022
Less Than Significant Impact. Localized impacts associated with construction criteria air pollutants emissions are assessed below and were determined to be less than significant.

Sensitive Receptors. Sensitive receptors are those individuals more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the population at large. People most likely to be affected by air pollution include children, the elderly, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. According to the SCAQMD, sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, long-term healthcare facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes (SCAQMD 1993). The closest off-site sensitive receptor land uses are single-family residences adjacent to the Project’s southern boundary. The closest on-site sensitive receptor land use is a single-family residence on the southern western portion of the Project site.

Localized Significance Thresholds. The SCAQMD recommends a localized significance thresholds (LST) analysis to evaluate localized air quality impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the Project site as a result of construction activities. The impacts were analyzed using methods consistent with those in the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology (SCAQMD 2009). The Project is located in Source Receptor Area (SRA) 9 (East San Gabriel Valley). The Project site is approximately 27 acres. However, for the purposes of the LST analysis, a 3-acre area of maximum daily disturbance was assumed, which was estimated using the SCAQMD’s Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Threshold (SCAQMD 2018). As mentioned previously, the closest sensitive receptors are single-family homes adjacent to the south of the Project site. The shortest receptor distance available in the SCAQMD LST Methodology and what assumed for this analysis is 25 meters (82 feet).

Project construction activities would result in temporary sources of on-site criteria air pollutant emissions associated with construction equipment exhaust and dust-generating activities. Emissions from trucks and worker vehicle trips are not included in the LST analysis because they occur off site.

The maximum daily on-site construction emissions generated during construction of the proposed Project is presented in Table 3.3-4, Construction Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis, and compared to the SCAQMD localized significance criteria for SRA 9 to determine whether Projectgenerated on-site construction emissions would result in potential LST impacts.

Table 3.3-4
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis Year
NO2 CO PM10 PM2.5
pounds per day (on-site)
2023 34.86 31.43 8.93 5.10
2024 13.73 16.67 0.61 0.58
Maximum Daily On-Site Emissions 34.86 31.43 8.93 5.10
SCAQMD LST Criteria 153 1,213 9 6
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Source: SCAQMD 2009.

Notes: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; LST = localized significance threshold.

See Appendix A for detailed results.

LSTs are shown for a 3-acre Project site corresponding to a distance to a sensitive receptor of 25 meters.

As shown in Table 3.3-4, proposed construction activities would not generate emissions in excess of site-specific LSTs; therefore, localized Project construction impacts would be less than significant.

CO Hotspots. Traffic-congested roadways and intersections have the potential to generate localized high levels of CO. Localized areas where ambient concentrations exceed federal and/or state Item #8. Page 201
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 266

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-14 December 2022
standards for CO are termed CO “hotspots.” CO transport is extremely limited and disperses rapidly with distance from the source. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, however CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthy levels, affecting sensitive receptors. Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with severely congested intersections operating at unacceptable levels of service (LOS) (LOS E or worse is unacceptable).

Project’s contributing to adverse traffic impacts may result in the formation of a CO hotspot. Additional analysis of CO hotspot impacts would be conducted if a project would result in a significant impact or contribute to an adverse traffic impact at a signalized intersection that would potentially subject sensitive receptors to CO hotspots. As discussed in Section 3.17, Transportation and based on the low volume of estimated vehicle trips, the proposed Project would not negatively impact the existing LOS at intersections or roadways around the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts related to CO hotspots would be less than significant.

Toxic Air Contaminants. Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are defined as substances that may cause or contribute to an increase in deaths or in serious illness, or that may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. As discussed under the LST analysis, the nearest sensitive receptors to the proposed Project are residences located adjacent to north and western Project boundaries.

Health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of cancer risk. The SCAQMD recommends an incremental cancer risk threshold of 10 in 1 million. “Incremental cancer risk” is the net increased likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs resulting from a project over a 9-, 30-, and 70-year exposure period will contract cancer based on the use of standard Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) risk-assessment methodology (OEHHA 2015). In addition, some TACs have non-carcinogenic effects. The SCAQMD recommends a Hazard Index of 1 or more for acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) non-carcinogenic effects. TACs that would potentially be emitted during construction activities associated with development of the proposed Project would be diesel particulate matter.

Diesel particulate matter emissions would be emitted from heavy equipment operations and heavyduty trucks. Heavy-duty construction equipment is subject to a California Air Resources Board (CARB) Airborne Toxics Control Measure for in-use diesel construction equipment to reduce diesel particulate emissions. As described for the LST analysis, PM10 (representative of diesel particulate matter) exposure would be minimal. According to the OEHHA, health risk assessments, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic emissions, should be based on a 30-year exposure period for the maximally exposed individual resident; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with the Project. Thus, the duration of the proposed construction activities would only constitute a small percentage of the total 30-year exposure period.

The construction period for the proposed Project would be approximately 18 months, after which construction-related TAC emissions would cease. Due to this relatively short period of exposure and minimal particulate emissions on site, TACs generated during construction would not be expected to result in concentrations causing significant health risks.

The proposed Project does not propose routine operational activities following completion of on-site construction activities that would generate TAC emissions. Operation of the proposed Project would not result in any non-permitted direct emissions (e.g., those from a point source such as diesel generators) or result in an increase in diesel vehicles (e.g., delivery trucks) over existing baseline conditions. The proposed Project would not result in substantial TAC exposure to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed Project, and impacts would be less than significant.

Item #8. Page 202
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 267

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-15 December 2022
Health Effects of Criteria Air Pollutants. Construction of the proposed Project would generate criteria air pollutant emissions; however, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD mass-emission thresholds.

The SCAB is designated as nonattainment for O3 for the NAAQS and CAAQS. Thus, existing O3 levels in the SCAB are at unhealthy levels during certain periods. The health effects associated with O3 are generally associated with reduced lung function. Because the proposed Project would not involve construction activities that would result in O3 precursor emissions (VOC or NOx) that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds, the Project is not anticipated to substantially contribute to regional O3 concentrations and the associated health impacts.

In addition to O3, NOx emissions contribute to potential exceedances of the NAAQS and CAAQS for NO2.

Exposure to NO2 and NOx can irritate the lungs, cause bronchitis and pneumonia, and lower resistance to respiratory infections. Project construction would not exceed the SCAQMD NOx threshold, and existing ambient NO2 concentrations are below the NAAQS and CAAQS. Thus, proposed Project construction is not expected to exceed the NO2 standards or contribute to associated health effects.

CO tends to be a localized impact associated with congested intersections. In terms of adverse health effects, CO competes with oxygen, often replacing it in the blood, reducing the blood’s ability to transport oxygen to vital organs. The results of excess CO exposure can include dizziness, fatigue, and impairment of central nervous system functions. CO hotspots were discussed previously as a less than significant impact. Thus, the proposed Project’s CO emissions would not contribute to the health effects associated with this pollutant.

The SCAB is designated as nonattainment for PM10 under the CAAQS and nonattainment forPM2.5 under the NAAQS and CAAQS. Particulate matter contains microscopic solids or liquid droplets that are so small that they can get deep into the lungs and cause serious health problems. Particulate matter exposure has been linked to a variety of problems, including premature death in people with heart or lung disease, nonfatal heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, aggravated asthma, decreased lung function, and increased respiratory symptoms such as irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing (EPA 2016b). As with O3 and NOx, the proposed Project would not generate emissions of PM10 or PM2.5 that would exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds. Accordingly, the proposed Project’s PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are not expected to cause any increase in related regional health effects for these pollutants.

In summary, the proposed Project would not result in a potentially significant contribution to regional concentrations of non-attainment pollutants and would not result in a significant contribution to the adverse health impacts associated with those pollutants, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact. Based on available information, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in other emissions that have not been addressed under Thresholds 3.3(a) through 3.3(c), above. As such, this analysis focuses on the potential for the proposed Project to generate odors. The occurrence and severity of potential odor impacts depend on numerous factors. The nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; wind speed and direction; and the sensitivity of receiving location each contribute to the intensity of the impact. Although offensive odors seldom cause physical harm, they can be annoying, cause distress among the public, and generate citizen complaints.

During construction, exhaust from equipment may produce discernible odors typical of most construction sites. Potential odors produced during construction would be attributable to Item #8. Page 203
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 268

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-16 December 2022
concentrations of unburned hydrocarbons from tailpipes of construction equipment. However, such odors would disperse rapidly from the Project site and generally occur at magnitudes that would not affect substantial numbers of people. Accordingly, impacts associated with odors during construction would be less than significant.

SCAQMD provides a list of land uses associated with odor concerns, which include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food-processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding (SCAQMD 1993). The Project includes operation of singlefamily residences which are not anticipated to generate odors and does not result in operation of the types of land uses listed in SCAQMD’s screening criteria. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts regarding other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

3.4 Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Item #8. Page 204
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 269

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-17 December 2022
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less Than Significant With Mitigation. The BRTR included a review of available literature and focused surveys for rare and/or special-status plant species with a potential to occur were also conducted within the Project site in 2019. Two surveys were conducted, one in the spring and one in the summer, in order to cover the blooming period of the target species. No special-status plant species were documented in previous surveys of the Project site or observed during focused plant surveys, which were conducted during the blooming period and under conditions that would have allowed identification for species potentially present. One species, the thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia), federally listed as threatened and State-listed as endangered, was previously recorded in the vicinity of the Project site.

More specifically, critical habitat for the species has been designated approximately 1.4 miles east of the Project site. However, the soil and habitat conditions where the thread-leaved brodiaea is usually found is not expected to occur at the Project site. Further, the reference population for the species along Colby Trail, approximately 1.4 miles to the east of the Project site, was confirmed to be in bloom during the focused rare plant survey conducted in May 2019, and the species was not observed in the Project site. Therefore, impacts to special-status plants under the proposed Project would be less than significant.

As outlined in the BRTR, one special-status wildlife species, yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia), was observed during surveys at the Project site. Three additional species, Southern California legless lizard (Anniella stebbinsi), coastal whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri), and hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), have a moderate potential to occur within the Project site. Direct impacts to the Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail could potentially occur from habitat loss or potential mortality or injury if these species are struck by moving vehicles or equipment if present on-site during vegetation and ground disturbing activities. Therefore, impacts to the Southern California legless lizard and the coastal whiptail would be potentially significant. Mitigation measure MM-BIO-1 would be implemented to reduce potential direct impacts to special-status wildlife (Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail) to a less-than-significant level.

One special-status bird species, yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia) has a moderate potential to nest and forage within the open shrublands throughout the Project site. This species is a CDFW specie of special concern (SSC) and there is a potential for this species to nest and/or forage within or immediately adjacent to the proposed development footprint. If this species is determined to occur on the Project site prior to construction, direct impacts could occur, particularly if construction would result in direct impacts to nesting and foraging habitat for yellow warbler. Additionally, the trees and shrubs present within the Project site could provide suitable nesting habitat for bird species (i.e., yellow warbler and raptors) protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703-712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503.5, 3503, and 3513. Trimming, pruning, and/or removal of trees and shrubs may occur as a result of construction of the Project, and could disrupt breeding activity.

Construction activities such as vegetation and tree removal during grading activities could result in direct impacts to nesting birds. Potential for direct permanent impacts to nesting birds would include direct impacts to individuals, active nests, eggs, or young, and would particularly occur during the general nesting season of February 1 through August 31. Therefore, direct permanent impacts to nesting birds, including special-status bird species and birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, would be potentially significant. Further, indirect impacts to nesting birds could occur from noise generated by consecution activities including vegetation removal and grading, that would be conducted during the avian breeding season (February 1 through August 31), through the potential Item #8. Page 205
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 270

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-18 December 2022
disruption of reproductive and feeding activities. Thus, construction of the proposed Project may result in mortality to nesting birds due to the abandonment of an active nest. Therefore, potential temporary indirect impacts during construction may occur under the Project and would be considered potentially significant. Implementation of MM-BIO-2, which requires seasonal recommendations, pre-construction survey, avoidance buffers, and monitoring, would reduce potential direct impacts to nesting birds a less-than-significant level. Implementation of MM-BIO-2 would reduce these potential indirect impacts to a less-than-significant level.

Lastly, direct permanent impacts to hoary bat could occur due to habitat loss and/or mortality or injury to individual species during construction activities. Therefore, direct permanent impacts to hoary bat would be potentially significant. Nighttime construction is not expected for the Project, so indirect impacts on potentially foraging special-status bats is not expected. MM-BIO-3, which requires seasonal recommendations, pre-construction survey, avoidance buffers, and monitoring of the hoary bat, would be implemented to reduce direct permanent impacts to a less-than-significant level.

MM-BIO-1: Special-Status Wildlife Relocation Plan. The applicant shall contract with a qualified biologist, whom shall be selected subject to the City’s approval, to prepare a Relocation Plan for Terrestrial Reptiles (Southern California legless lizard and coastal whiptail). The Plan shall at minimum include: identification of potentially occupied habitat, the timing and locations where surveys should be conducted; the habitat and conditions in the proposed relocation site(s); the methods that would be used for trapping and relocating the individual species; and requirements to provide the documentation/recordation of the species and number of animals relocated. The Plan shall be submitted to CDFW for review and must be approved by CDFW prior to commencement of any vegetation clearing or earthwork activities on the Project site.

Monitoring. A qualified biologist shall be present during initial ground-disturbing activities within the Project site. The qualified biologist shall possess an appropriate California scientific collecting permit to handle special-status species likely to occur in the Project area. If special-status species reptiles are detected in the work area during the surveys, the authorized biologist will capture and relocate individuals to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat outside of the construction area, but as close to their origin as possible (consistent with the approved Relocation Plan). All wildlife moved or flushed during Project activities shall be documented by the biologist and CDFW shall be notified.

MM-BIO-2: Nesting Bird Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the migratory bird nesting season (February Item #8. Page 206
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 271

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-19 December 2022
15through September 15 (as early as January 1 for some raptors) (February 1 through August 31) in order to avoid any potential significant impact to birds and raptors that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, an avian nesting survey of the Project site and contiguous habitat within 500 feet of all Project-related impact areas shall be conducted for protected migratory birds and active nests. The avian nesting survey shall be performed by a qualified wildlife biologist, subject to the City’s approval, within 72 hours prior to the start of construction-related activity in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703–712) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513.

If an active bird nest is found, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans along with an appropriate no disturbance buffer, which shall be determined by the qualified wildlife biologist based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance (minimum of 50 feet for common, urban-adapted species, 300 feet for other passerine species, and 500 feet for raptors, and 0.5 mile special-status species). The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing and shall be avoided until the nest is vacated and the juveniles have fledged. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on nesting birds, sensitivity of the area, and adherence to the no-disturbance buffers. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work on the Project site and shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.

MM-BIO-3: Bat Roost Avoidance. Initiation of construction activities, including initial vegetation clearing, should avoid the maternity roosting season (March 1 through August September 30), in order to avoid any potential significant impact to bat maternity roosts. If construction activities must be initiated during the maternity roosting season, a roost survey must be conducted by a qualified bat specialist biologist, subject to the City’s approval. The roost survey for roosting bats shall be conducted on the Project site, including all trees and structures within 300 feet of Project-related impact areas, and shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities.

If bats are not detected, but the bat specialist determines that roosting bats my be present at any time of year and could roost in trees at a given location, during tree pruning, trees should be pushed using heavy machinery prior to using a chainsaw for any limbing or trimming. To ensure the optimum warning for any roosting bats that may still be present, trees should be pushed lightly two or three times, with a pause of approximately 30 seconds between each nudge to allow bats to become active. A period of at least 24 hours, and preferably 48 hours, should elapse prior to such operations to allow bats to escape.

If maternity roosting is identified, work should be scheduled between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost (March 1 to September 30). those trees and/or occupied structures shall not be removed during the bat maternity roost season (March to August) and a minimum 300-foot buffer shall be established. The “no disturbance buffer” area shall be demarcated in the field with Item #8. Page 207
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 272

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-20 December 2022
flagging and stakes and the roost shall be monitored by a qualified biologist until roost is vacated and juveniles have fledged.
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Per the BRTR, the approximately 27-acre Project site is comprised of six vegetation communities and land covers, including annual non-native grasslands (6.42 acres), coast live oak woodland (10.87 acres), disturbed sagebrush scrub (2.24 acres), ornamental/landscape areas (2.41 acres), urban/developed areas (0.28-acre), and California walnut groves (1.4-acre). According to the BRTR, three vegetation communities were mapped within the Project site that are considered sensitive under CEQA by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and/or by the City. These include California walnut groves, disturbed coastal sage scrub, and coast live oak woodlands. Species associated with the California walnut groves alliance include white alder (Alnus rhombifolia), California ash (Fraxinus dipetala), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), coast live oak, valley oak, arroyo willow, red willow (Salix laevigata), blue elderberry (Sambucus nigra), and California bay. California sagebrush scrub is a community dominated or co-dominated by California sagebrush (Artemisia californica) with a continuous or intermittent shrub canopy less than two meters (seven feet) in height with a variable ground layer. This native plant community characterized by a variety of soft, low, aromatic, drought-deciduous shrubs, such as California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), coyote bush (Baccharis pilularis), Eastern Mojave buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), chaparral yucca (Hesperoyucca whipplei), coastal pricklypear (Opuntia littoralis), and sages (Salvia spp.), with scattered evergreen shrubs, including lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), and toyon. It typically develops on steep, south-facing slopes and at times, though rarely, occurs on flooded low-gradient deposits along streams in which are scattered willows (Salix spp.) and mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia), depending on the site conditions. The coast live oak woodlands community within the Project site is dominated by coast live oak, though California sycamore (Platanus racemosa), southern California black walnut, and Washington fan palm (Washingtonia robusta) are also scattered throughout this vegetation community. The understory within the coast live oak woodland mapped within the eastern perimeter of the Project site and within the areas zoned as Open Space - Natural (north of the Project site) include bromes (Bromus spp.), sowthistles (Sonchus spp.), ragweeds (Ambrosia spp.), Pacific poison oak, tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) annual yellow sweetclover (Melilotus indicus), Cucamonga manroot (Marah macrocarpa), Bermuda buttercup (Oxalis pes-caprae), Alefeld’s pea (Lathyrus vestitus var. alefeldii), narrowleaf bedstraw (Galium angustifolium), distant phacelia (Phacelia distans), and wild canterbury bells (Phacelia minor). The understory within the coast live oak woodland mapped within the western perimeter of the Study Area is associated with non-native and landscaped species dominated by English ivy (Hedera helix), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), tree tobacco, ornamental fig trees (Ficus sp.), and smilo grass (Stipa miliacea). Impacts to special-status vegetation communities are identified in Table 3.4-1.

Table 3.4-1
Permanent and Temporary Direct Impacts to Vegetation Communities and Land Covers Vegetation Community/
Land Cover Type
Direct
Permanent
Impacts (acres)
Direct
Temporary
Impacts (acres)
Remaining within the
Property Boundary
(acres)
Native Vegetation Communities
Coast Live Oak Woodland Alliance (CLOW)* 7.71 — 3.17
Item #8. Page 208
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 273

GRAND ESTATES PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8375
3-21 December 2022
Table 3.4-1
Permanent and Temporary Direct Impacts to Vegetation Communities and Land Covers Vegetation Community/
Land Cover Type
Direct
Permanent
Impacts (acres)
Direct
Temporary
Impacts (acres)
Remaining within the
Property Boundary
(acres)
California Walnut Groves (CWG)* — 0.01 1.39
Disturbed California Sagebrush Scrub (dCSS)* 0.20 0.71 0.65 Naturalized Vegetation Communities
California Annual Non-Native Grassland (NNG) 2.02 1.47 2.93 Non-Natural Land Cover Types
Urban/Developed (DEV) 0.47 — 2.42
Developed-Concrete Channel (DEV-CC) 0.28 — —
Disturbed Habitat (DH) 0.87 0.10 —
Parks and Ornamental Plantings (ORN) 1.77 — —
Total** 13.32 2.29 10.30
Source: Appendix B-1.

Notes:
* Special-status vegetation community per CDFW and/or the City of Glendora (2006). ** Total may not sum due to rounding.

Potentially significant direct permanent impacts to vegetation communities and land covers would occur as a result of earthwork and/or vegetation removal activities. Direct permanent impacts would occur within the southern section of the Project site, where development of the 12 new graded pads and private streets are proposed, and for proposed debris/flood control improvements and access road in the northern section of the Project site. Direct temporary impacts to vegetation communities and land covers would occur only within the northern section of the Project site associated with the proposed flood/debris control improvements. As part of the proposed Project design, the affected areas would be hydroseeded with native seeds to facilitate the reestablishment of vegetative cover. Additionally, container trees and shrubs will be installed in the minimal grading/grooming areas per the Project’s approved landscaping plan. The proposed Project would have 7.91 acres of direct permanent impacts to two sensitive vegetation communities (City of Glendora 2006): coast live oak woodland and disturbed California sagebrush scrub. The Project would have 0.72 acres of direct temporary impacts to the two sensitive vegetation communities: California walnut woodland and disturbed California sagebrush scrub.

Permanent and temporary direct impacts to coast live oak woodland, California walnut grove woodland, and disturbed California sagebrush scrub would be considered potentially significant. Implementation of MM-BIO-4, which includes preparation and implementation of a Habitat Restoration Plan, would reduce potential direct impacts to sensitive vegetation communities to a less-than-significant level.

Further, potential short-term indirect impacts to special-status vegetation communities located at the Project site would primarily result from construction activities and include impacts related to or resulting from the generation of fugitive dust, and increased human activity, the introduction of pollutants from construction equipment. Excessive dust can decrease the vigor and productivity of vegetation through effects on light, penetration, photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration, increased penetration of phytotoxic gaseous pollutants, and increased incidence of pests and diseases. Erosion and chemical pollution (releases of fuel, oil, lubricants, paints, release agents, and other Projectrelated materials) may affect special-status vegetation communities. The use of chemical pollutants can decrease the number of plant pollinators, increase the existence of non-native plants, and cause damage to and destruction of native plants. These potential short-term, construction-related indirect impacts could affect the special-status vegetation communities in the Project site. Therefore, Item #8. Page 209
Meeting Date: 1/24/2023 / Packet Page #: 274

Glendora City CouncilJanuary 24, 2023

Glendora City Council
January 24, 2023