David Fredendall, Mayor, District 2
Michael Allawos, Mayor Pro Tem, District 1
Karen Davis, Councilmember, District 4
Shaunna Elias, Councilmember, District 3
Mendell Thompson, Councilmember, District 5
CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY
5:00 PM CLOSED SESSION
7:00 PM GENERAL SESSION
Wednesday, November 12, 2025, 5:00 PM
City Hall Council Chamber
116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CLOSED SESSION
1. Closed Session Items
— CS1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code §54957 to conduct an employee performance evaluation for the position of City Manager — CS2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code §54957.6 with the City Council as the city negotiators, regarding labor negotiations with unrepresented employees - City Manager
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
In permitting a nonsectarian invocation, the City does not intend to proselytize, advance, or disparage any faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular belief or form of invocation.
REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
The City of Glendora encourages community participation at its public meetings. Speakers are limited to three minutes, and time may not be shared or transferred. A total of 30 minutes is reserved for public comment, which may be extended by majority vote of the legislative body. At regular meetings, comments may address both agenda and non-agenda items during the Public Comment portion, with additional opportunities to speak provided during Public Hearings. At special meetings, public comment is limited to agenda items. Residents may participate in person or submit comments by email, phone, mail, or other available methods. Participation options may be adjusted if a State of Emergency, Health Order, or Executive Order limits in-person attendance. For more information, see the Guide to Public Meetings and Participating in Public Meetings on the City’s website at www.cityofglendora.gov/citymeetings.
2. Public Comments Received
MEMBER STATEMENTS/REPORTS
CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY STATEMENTS
SPECIAL ITEMS
3. Proclamation proclaiming November 10-14, 2025 as Law Enforcement Records and Support Personnel Appreciation Week
4. Presentation on an Update on SB 1383 Three-Stream Commercial Program from Athens Services
5. Small Business Saturday: Shop Glendora
6. 2025-2027 Strategic Planning Update for November 2025
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings shall conform to the protocol established to conduct of public meetings, proceedings, and business in the City of Glendora. Following presentation of the staff report, the applicant/appellant will be allowed ten (10) minutes in which to make a presentation. Following the presentation of the applicant/appellant public testimony share be called, each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes, speaking once. The Presiding Officer may permit a five (5) minute rebuttal/summation by a representative of applicant/appellant. The public hearing will then be closed, and no member of the public shall be allowed to speak further unless, upon motion, and the public hearing is reopened by the governing body. Any person desiring to provide testimony during a Public Hearing item shall make his/her presence known to the Presiding officer. Speakers are entitled to submit written or other graphic evidence. All such evidence presented shall be retained by the City Clerk as part of the Clerk’s record.
PLEASE NOTE: If you challenge any of the proposed action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
7. Public Hearing to Adopt a Master Schedule of Fees for Services and a User Fee Cost Recovery Policy Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Adopt the User Fee Cost Recovery Policy; and
— 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR SERVICE."
8. Public Hearing to conduct the Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2097 adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Codes
Recommended Action for City Council:
— 1. Adopt on second reading an Ordinance 2097 entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2025 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; AND CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; INCLUDING SELECTED APPENDICES THERETO;" by reading of the title only and waiving further reading; and — 2. Direct the preparation of a summary of ordinance for publication pursuant to Govt. Code 36933 and Resolution CC 2018-40.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion without individual discussion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the governing body requests specific item(s) be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered after the Consent Calendar is approved. Anyone wishing to address a Consent Calendar item should do so during the Public Comment Period.
9. Affirm minutes from the October 28, 2025 Meeting
Recommended Action for the City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority:
— 1. Affirm minutes as presented.
10. Review and Affirm Disbursements for October 2025 in the Amount of $5,841,894.18 Recommended Action for the City Council and Successor Agency:
— 1. Review and affirm disbursements for October 2025 in the amount of $5,841,894.18.
11. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Krzysztof Chris Balasinski for Glendora Youth Basketball Referee Services in an amount not to exceed $100,710 Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Award an Agreement to Kriciazysztof Chris Balasinski (Ref Union) in an amount not to exceed $100,710; and
— 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement with Krzysztof Chris Balasinski (Ref Union).
12. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2095 Amending Title 21 (Zoning) of the Glendora Municipal Code to Establish Objective Design Standards and Streamline Existing Regulations in Alignment with the City’s Adopted Housing Element and State Law Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Waive full reading, read by title only and adopt on second reading Ordinance No. 2095 entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING TITLE 21 (ZONING) OF THE GLENDORA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AND STREAMLINE EXISTING REGULATIONS IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT AND STATE LAW (File# PLN22-0042).
13. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2096 approving the 2025 City-Wide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys and Declaring Speed Limits
Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Waive full reading, read by title only and adopt on second reading Ordinance 2096 entitled, "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY AND AMENDING THE GLENDORA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DETERMINE AND DECLARE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS."
14. Consideration of a Resolution approving Final Parcel Map No. 83617 (Applicant: Dmitriy Kazakov; Property Owner: John B. Cashion; Location: 445 N. Oak Drive and 960 W. Leadora Avenue) Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 83617 SUBDIVIDING A SINGLE PARCEL INTO TWO SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS, LOCATED AT 445 N. OAK DRIVE AND 960 W. LEADORA AVENUE, GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA”; and
— 2. Authorize the City Engineer and City Clerk to sign Final Parcel Map No. 83617.
15. Approve the Acquisition of Public Works and Police Department Vehicles Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Approve the acquisition of one (1) 2026 Ford F-650 with Thermo-lay hot asphalt system from Haaker Equipment company, at a cost of $266,298.38;
— 2. Approve the acquisition of five (5) 2026 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Explorers from National Auto Fleet Group, including taxes and fees, in the amount of $330,511.15; — 3. Approve a supplemental appropriation from Internal Services Fund for Vehicles and Equipment (Fund 554) in the amount of $186,000.
MEMBER AGENDA ITEMS
16. 2025 Election for San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority (WQA) Board Member Representing Cities with Prescriptive Pumping Rights (Term 2026 - 2030) Recommended Action for the City Council:
— 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, CASTING ITS VOTES FOR COUNCILMEMBER ____________ TO
REPRESENT CITIES WITH PRESCRIPTIVE PUMPING RIGHTS ON THE BOARD OF THE SAN GABRIEL BASIN WATER QUALITY AUTHORITY (WQA)" casting Glendora's five votes for either Robert Gonzales, City of Azusa or Jeffrey Maloney, City of Alhambra for the San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority (WQA) Board Member representing cities with prescriptive pumping rights.
NEW BUSINESS
17. Award of a Public Works Contract to Select Electric, Inc. for Traffic Signal Modifications, Plan No. 1388 in the amount of $2,087,197
Recommended Action for City Council:
— 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Title 14, Section 15301(c) of the California Code of Regulations; — 2. Approve the Plans and Specifications for the (Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Funded Cycle 11-Traffic Signal Modifications, Plan No. 1388;
— 3. Award an Agreement to Select Electric, Inc., for the HSIP Funded Cycle -11 Traffic Signal Modifications, Plan No. 1388 Project in the amount of $2,087,197; — 4. Authorize 10% contingency in the amount of $208,720; and — 5. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement with Select Electric, Inc., including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.
18. Award the Professional Services Agreement with Craftwater Engineering, Inc. for the Stormwater Master Plan Project FY 2025/26 for an amount not to exceed $341,895 Recommended Action for City Council:
— 1. Award a professional services agreement to Craftwater Engineering, Inc. for the Stormwater Master Plan Project FY 2025/26 (Plan No. 1376) in the amount of $341,895, with a 10% contingency of $34,190, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $376,085;
— 2. Authorize the Public Works Director or designee to execute any necessary change orders up to 10 percent of the original contract amount;
— 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the Agreement, including any minor or nonsubstantive changes; and — 4. Approve a supplemental appropriation from the Measure W Fund (250) in the amount of $126,085 to fully fund the project.
MEMBER/STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
Date Posted: November 6, 2025 04:53 pm
AthensServices.com
Athens Services
City of Glendora
Proposed Commercial and Multifamily
3-Stream Program Transition
AthensServices.com
SB 1383 Program Elements
Collection Program Contamination Monitoring Waste Assessments Outreach & Education Procurement
Additional Program Elements Include:
Data & Reporting
Food Recovery Support
In August 2022, Council adopted an amendment to ensure SB 1383 compliance.
AthensServices.com
What is a 3-Stream Program?
Trash service for commercial and multifamily customers would now include recycle and organics as the base level of service 3 Yard Trash 96 Gallon Recycle 64 Gallon Organics
AthensServices.com
Pay As You Throw vs. Bundled Service
Service Type Pay as you Throw Bundle Rate
Trash (1 - 3yd bin, 1 day/week) $368.82 $419.44
Organics (64 gallon) (0.00) $120.81 $0.00 ($23.05 Year 1) Recycle (96 gallon) N/A $0.00 ($27.56)
Total $368.82 $419.44
Transition to a bundled rate structure
Customers receive a blue and green barrel with trash service AthensServices.com
Right Sizing Collection Service
Service Type Current Rates Proposed Bundled Rates
Option 1
Proposed Bundled Rates
Option 2
Standard Service 3 Yard Trash
64gal Organics
$368.82
3-Yard Trash Bundle (Default)
(96gal Recycle & 64gal Organics)
$419.44
1.5 Yard Trash Bundle (96R & 64O)
w/ Extra 96 Gallon Recycle
$331.63 + $27.56 = $359.19
Organics Waivers
Customers
3 Yard Trash
No Organics
$368.82
1.5 Yard Trash Bundle (96R & 64O)
(2 – 96 gallon recycle, if organics not
needed)
$331.63
AthensServices.com
Additional Right Sizing Options
Service Type Current Rates Proposed Bundled Rates
Option 3
Standard Service 1.5 Yard Trash (2x week)
64gal Organics
$372.28
1.5 Yard Trash (1x week)
1.5 Yard Recycle (1x week)
64gal Organics
$281.02 + $82.68 - $27.56 = $336.32
AthensServices.com
Commercial Customer Support
Direct in-person outreach to each customer
Customer Service Department (888) 336-6100
AthensServices.com
Additional Proposed Changes
Contamination Fees:
Right-size current fees
Keep one rate at $50-60
Customer assessed a fee after two warnings;
resets each calendar year
City Facilities:
Transition all City facilities and City Special Events to Three Streams AthensServices.com
Next Steps
Staff is currently working with Athens Services
Contract Amendment
Municipal Code Update
AthensServices.com
Questions?
SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY:
SHOP GLENDORA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 12, 2025
SHANTELLE CORIA, MANAGEMENT AIDE
CURRENT INITATIVES
SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER
WORKSHOPS AND EVENTS
GLENDORA BUSINESS NEWSLETTER
OPEN REWARDS
VIRTUAL WORKSHOP
GOOGLE BUSINESS PROFILES &
LOCAL SEO
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20
2 PM – 3 PM
SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER
WORKSHOPS AND EVENTS
GLENDORA BUSINESS NEWSLETTER
HOW TO RAISE PRICES WITHOUT LOSING
CUSTOMERS
COMMUNICATING YOUR BRAND & STORY
COMMUNITY + CONSUMER TRENDS
WANT LOYAL CUSTOMERS
OPEN REWARDS
SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY
President/CEO of the Chamber of Commerce, Joe Cina
November 29, 2025
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE: NOVEMBER 2025
Completed 25 24.5%
In Process 63 61.8%
Not-Started 14 13.7%
102
INDICATOR SUMMARY
2025-2027 STRATEGIC PLAN
INDICATOR: The indicators are specific deliverables or milestones that indicate progress or completion within each action. They detail the work required, with timelines and assigned departments, enabling granular tracking of progress within actions and contributing to broader outcome and goal achievement.
ACTION: Specific projects, programs, initiatives, policies, or operational changes the City undertakes to achieve desired outcomes. These are the concrete steps to achieve the outcomes moving the City toward its goals.
OUTCOME: Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time bound (SMART) results the City aims to achieve within each goal area.
They translate broad goals into concrete targets, clarifying success and focusing efforts on tangible results within defined timeframes.
GOAL: Broad, overarching focus areas guiding City and Council efforts and resource allocation over a defined period. They represent key priorities, providing a strategic framework and communicating overall ambitions to stakeholders, influencing decision-making.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed RFP for Consultant 2026 Q1 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process RFP draft ready in January 2026. Prior to release, staff will present the RFP as an informational item to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Subdivision Code 2025 Q4 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process Objective Design Guidelines 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) Complete Council adopted first reading on October 28, 2025 Safety Element 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) Complete Council adopted on October 28, 2025 ENA with Mercy Housing - (development complete in 3 years of ENA approval) 2025 Q2 Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) In-Process ENA executed on July 8, 2025.
Adoption of Development Vision 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) Complete Council adopted Station Area Plan on July 8, 2025 Gold Line Authority Property Sale 2025 Q2 Gold Line Construction Authority In-Process Development application received from Warmington housing 86 units Metro develops parking lot, including affordable units 2028-2030 La County Metro Not Started METRO released an RFP for housing development in 2023 at various station sites; the Glendora A-Line Station is part of that RFP.
Sunflower Campus Development Agreement approval 2025 Q2 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process Lewis 81 unit development application Azusa Unified School District Development Agreement approval 2025 Q4 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process Melia 163 unit concept application Glendora Unified School District Development Agreement approval 2026 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process City and GUSD Staff have met to discuss framework for future rezoning of campuses and other district property. District understands that community benefits are necessary for rezoning projects.
Goal 1: SubURBAN Living
Foster intentional urbanization through increased targeted housing density, revitalized commercial areas, and enhanced services and infrastructure that supports a livable community for all.
Outcome 1: Increased targeted housing density and housing options at all income levels ACTION 1.1: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
ACTION 1.2: 1762 DALE DEVELOPMENT
ACTION 1.3: STATION DEVELOPMENT VISION (TOC/TAP)
ACTION 1.4: SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT
Entitling Developments 2027 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) Not Started Approve Development Entitlements 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) Complete Council approved Tentative Map on August 26, 2025 Affordability Regulatory Agreement 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Council approves EAP programming 2025 Q2 Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) Complete Council approved on March 25, 2025 Implementing the plan + Creating the programs Ongoing Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) In-Process Shop local, SBDC workshops, ED newsletter implemented Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Prepare Service Provider Assessment 2025 Q3
Recreation & Human Services (Human Services
Manager) / Library (Director, Library Services
Manager)
Complete
PD update 10/29/25 - Continued meetings and partnerships with Human Services and LA CADA. Prioritizing same-day response for homeless encampments and balancing enforcement and outreach, where appropriate. Leveraging partnerships with outside agencies (LASD and CHP) to identify unhoused individuals involved in serious or ongoing criminal activity. PD and Human Services outreach specifically for seniors or elderly who require services and may be on the verge of homelessness.
ACTION 1.5: SAN JOSE / WOODLAND SITE DEVELOPMENT
Goal 1: SubURBAN Living
Outcome 2: Revitalized commercial centers
ACTION 1.6: ECONOMIC ACTION PLAN
Goal 1: SubURBAN Living
Outcome 3: A complete eco-system to support the homeless population and improve access to support tools ACTION 1.7: FORMALIZE INTERDEPENDENCE OF OUR PARTNERS WHO SERVE HOMELESS COMMUNITY Convene summit / workshop w/partners 2025 Q4 Recreation & Human Services and GPD In-Process Human Services continuing services with YWCA Senior Case mgmt at La Fetra Center. City receiving Measure A funds to assist with motel vouchers, rental assistance, eviction prevention, landlord engagement. Staff coordinating with Shepherd's Pantry, GUSD, local churches to facilitate referrals and increase community awareness of these resources.
ENA with Mercy Housing - (development complete in 3 years of ENA approval) 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) In-Process ENA executed on July 8, 2025.
Agreements with service providers + motel owners 2025 Q3 Recreation & Human Services Complete 5/2025 We have a two year agreement with L.A. CADA with an additional one year option for Outreach.
Implementing the plan + Creating the programs 2025 Q2 Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) In-Process Shop local, SBDC workshops, ED newsletter implemented Sunstone Challenge 2025 Q2 Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) Complete Glendora Team earned 2nd place Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Workshop with City Council 2026 Q3 Comm. Dev. (Planning) Not Started City Council direction to move forward with annexation of a portion thereof 2027 Q1 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process Council approved contract with consultant (RSG) on February 25, 2025 to move forward with annexation process. Completed survey work, and initial meetings with LAFCO and LA County. Working on expense and revenue analysis and prezone ordinance ACTION 1.11: REVIEW COST OF SERVICE STUDY
ACTION 1.8: 1762 DALE DEVELOPMENT
ACTION 1.9: COORDINATE ALTERNATIVES WITH LOCAL MOTEL OWNERS ACTION 1.10: ECONOMIC ACTION PLAN
Goal 1: SubURBAN Living
Outcome 4: Determine on annexation of county islands on the western City border Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Hire an Economic Development Manager 2025 Q3 Comm. Dev. + CMO Complete Tiffany Chew hired to fill position Convene the working group and report of progress 2026 Q4 Comm. Dev. + CMO Not Started Began discussing roles and responsibilities (e.g. who maintains landscaping in the Village) with the BID. Working group target start date 2026 Q2.
Approval of plan programs and funding 2025 Q4 Comm. Dev. (Housing and Economic Dev.) In-Process Council approved action plan on March 25, 2025 Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Liaison engages and supports economic development programs and initiatives Ongoing CMO Complete City Council has assigned a member (Thompson) as the Chamber Liaison.
Additionally, another Councilmember (Elias), participates at the SGVCOG Olympic Task Force, as well as the City's Economic Development Manager to find opportunities for the City.
Goal 2: Glendora as a Destination
Attract visitors through strategic marketing, promotion of local businesses, and enhanced connectivity between attractions for a seamless destination experience.
Outcome 1: Destination marketing to increase visitors to Glendora Goal 2: Glendora as a Destination
Outcome 2: Economic development strategies to encourage people to "Shop Glendora" ACTION 2.1: CONVENE A WORKING GROUP WITH THE CHAMBER AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ACTION 2.2: ECONOMIC ACTION PLAN
ACTION 2.3: COUNCIL LIASION CHAMPIONS CHAMBER STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ACTION 2.4: COMMUNICATION AUDIT
Recommendations for a Communication Plan 2025 Q4
City Clerk - Lead/Legislative/
Admin/IT/PW/Finance/CMO/PD/Library/Comm.
Dev./Rec. & HS
Complete
Over the past six months, the City advanced Goal 2, Action 2.4 – Communications Audit through key foundational steps. The Communications Audit, conducted by JPW Communications, was completed, and the findings along with 13 strategic recommendations were presented to the City Manager’s Office in June 2025 for consideration and possible action. The recommendations are currently under review and evaluation. The next step includes scheduling a Glendora Messaging Workshop in January 2026 to define a unified citywide narrative and develop draft key message pillars for organizational use.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed See indications above 2025 Q3-
2026 Q1 Comm. Dev. (Planning) In-Process RFP draft ready in January 2026. Prior to release, staff will present the RFP as an informational item to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Hire polling firm to complete poll 2026 Q1 CMO Complete 2025 Community Survey included several questions pertaining to potential South Hills Development. A majority of respondents (57%) indicated they would support the development proposal as described, whereas 32@ opposed the concept, and 11% were unsure. Age appeared to be a driving factor in shaping opinions about development, with support being highest amount residents 25 and under (77%), steadily declining with age, reaching 46% among seniors.
Council Work Session 2026 Q2 CMO In-Process
Staff has solicited proposals for a firm to provide development scenarios and viability - costs range between $50,000 to $100,000. Staff will return to City Council by mid-2026 with an updated conversation about direction.
Goal 2: Glendora as a Destination
Outcome 3: Determine the highest and best use for South Hills ACTION 2.6: CONDUCT COMMUNITY POLLING FOR SOUTH HILLS TO INFORM COUNCIL'S POLICY DIRECTION ACTION 2.7:HIRE AVID TRAILS TO DESIGN A MOUNTAIN BIKE PARK AND 6 MILES OF BIKE TRAILS ACTION 2.5: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Recognizing the community's need for a dedicated biking space, the City has been working since 2022 to develop a bike park. The park is being designed as a familyfriendly destination where people can come Construction 2026 Q4
Trail completion
Recreation & Human Services In-Process In the process to hire a engineer/project manager to oversee and coordinate the project Final Design, Plan Check and that proper bid documents are prepared.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Issue/ award RFP 2026 Q3 Public Works Not Started Target start date 2026 Q1/Q2 Council Work Session 2026 Q3 Public Works Not Started Target start date 2026 Q1/Q2 Beautification of public spaces, like parks, streets, and plazas, involves enhancing their visual appearance and making them more inviting and enjoyable for residents and visitors, often through landscaping, art installation, and improved infrastructure. 2026 Q4 Public Works, Comm. Dev and PD- Community
Preservation
In-Process
City parks continue to received significant improvements, including upcoming skate park repairs, a new shade and picnic area at Gladstone Park, and upgraded playground equipment in the Teen Center. New Glendora Logo signage and street signs will begin installation in mid-2026.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Create Communications Task Force 2026 Q1
City Clerk - Lead/Legislative/
Admin/IT/PW/Finance/CMO/PD/Library/Comm.
Dev./Rec. & HS
In-Process
This action is part of strategic recommended action 2 proposed by JPW Communications in their Strategic Communications Audit presented to the City Manager in June 2025.
Gather data, Develop Framework for plan and Engage Community 2026 Q2 City Clerk - Lead/Legislative/
Admin/IT/PW/Finance/CMO/PD/Library/Comm.
Dev./Rec. & HS
In-Process
This action is part of several strategic recommended actions proposed by JPW Communications in their Strategic Communications Audit presented to the City Manager in June 2025.
Approval of plan by City Council 2026 Q3
City Clerk - Lead/Legislative/
Admin/IT/PW/Finance/CMO/PD/Library/Comm.
Dev./Rec. & HS
Not Started
Goal 2: Glendora as a Destination
Outcome 4: Connected destination and attraction areas
ACTION 2.9: DOCUMENTATION OF BEAUTIFICATION AND VISUAL APPEAL EFFORTS THROUGH LINKAGES OF ITEMS IN THIS PLAN ACTION 2.8: CONDUCT A WAY-FINDING ASSESSMENT
ACTION 2.10: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN Goal 2: Glendora as a Destination
Outcome 5: Implement Strategic Communications Plan
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed City Council Work Session 2025 Q1 CM In-Process
Several work sessions have been held about City facilities. Both workshops and informational items have been given to the City Council and Board of Library Trustees.
New paving and potentially a new modular building TBD Public Works / Finance In-Process Paving complete, evaluating new building/additional improvements Contact vendors and receive proposals 2026 Q2 PW/Finance/CMO Complete Staff began work with the DLR Group and an updated Civic Center development scenario. Work was just completed on an updated Civic Center design and functionality based on feedback and direction from the City Council.
Vendor selection 2026 Q3 PW/Finance/CMO Complete City Council approved amended agreement with the DLR Group.
Coordination with citywide facility assessment 2026 Q3 All Complete Citywide assessment of all facilities is complete, with over $50 million in identified needs to remain "Status Quo." Visioning exercise with the DLR Group identifies space needed by category.
Consolidate study / civic center Coordination of results from citywide facility/space assessments 2026 Q1 Admin/IT/PW/Finance/CMO/PD/Library In-Process DLR Group work on Civic Center and use of space will be provided to the City Council in December 2025.
Goal 3: New + Revitalized Facilities
Develop new and enhanced facilities including a modern civic center and improved public spaces that foster connectivity, accessibility, and civic pride.
Outcome 1: New or revitalized Civic Center
ACTION 3.1: CITY COUNCIL DIRECTS FUNDING METHODOLOGY
ACTION 3.2: NEW TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
ACTION 3.3: COMPLETE SPACE PLANNING ASSESSMENT
ACTION 3.4: DETERMINE IF NEW OR REMODEL
ACTION 3.5: SERVICE IMPACT PLANNING
Develop plans for service delivery for departments impacted by renovations and new buildings
As Needed Admin/IT/PW/Finance/CMO/PD/Library In-Process Library has started brainstorming options for continuing services, touring library facilities in other cities that have made use of temporary spaces, and attending training relating to service delivery.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Conduct community outreach Council 2025 Q2 Public Works Complete UFM to be presented to City Council in 2025 Q4 Will provide an assessment of ADA deficiencies and a plan to tackle and work towards compliance 2026 Q4 Public Works In-Process Steady progress has been made, two year process, completion expected to be on time.
Will provide an assessment of our park facilities deficiencies and a plan to tackle and work towards updating them 2026 Q2 Recreation & Human Services and Public Works Not Started Putting together the RFP for the Parks Master Plan in early 2026 to see what park facilities deficiencies.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Program is completed and becomes central location for all local groups to solicit volunteer assistance
In progress/
Ongoing
Human Resources In-Process
HR continues to work with Police, Recreation & Human Services, and the Library to draft and adopt a Citywide Volunteer Policy to expand the pool of volunteers to be utilized by any Department.
Implement new program 2026 Q3 Public Works Not Started
Establish a city-sponsored beautification project 2025 Q4 Human Resources Not Started ACTION 3.9: DEVELOP A CENTRALIZED CITYWIDE VOLUNTEER PROGRAM ACTION 3.10: EXPAND AND CREATE LOCAL ADOPT-A-PARK, STREET, AND RELATED PROGRAMS ACTION 3.11: DEVELOP A LARGE, YEARLY CITY-SPONSORED BEAUTIFICATION/VOLUNTEER DAY OR EVENT Goal 3: New + Revitalized Facilities
Outcome 2: Improved Public Spaces
ACTION 3.6: COMPLETION OF URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL
ACTION 3.7: ADA TRANSITION PLAN
ACTION 3.8: COMPLETION OF THE PARKS MASTER PLAN
Goal 3: New + Revitalized Facilities
Outcome 3: Give Back to the Community
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Final report to Council 2025 Q4 Public Works In-Process Target date is December 2025 Determine goal PCI rating + funding opportunities 2025 Q4 Public Works In-Process Target date is December 2025 Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Enter into an Amended MOA with the SGVCOG to administer and deliver the People Movement Project 2024 Q3 Public Works Complete Completed in 2025 Q1 Provide Outreach Ongoing Public Works In-Process Will provide notice construction to begin in Spring 2026 Release RFP for Construction and complete the San Dimas Urban Trail 2026 Q1 Public Works In-Process Award for Construction expected Jan 26, NTP Feb 26 Complete Design 2026 Q1 Public Works In-Process Design expected to be on time Refurbish Antique Street Lights 2025 Q4 Public Works In-Process Will begin in Nov 25, Completion target May 2026 Release RFP for Construction and complete the First Last Mile Improvements 2027 Q2 Public Works Not Started RFP likely in 2026 Q2 Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
Plan and construct infrastructure that enhances street conditions, expands trail connectivity, improves traffic safety and mobility, upgrades water systems, and ensures compliance with regulatory standards for a resilient and accessible community Outcome 1: Improved PCI ratings for streets
ACTION 4.1: COMPLETE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
Outcome 2: Complete People Movement project
ACTION 4.2: SAN DIMAS WASH URBAN TRAIL
ACTION 4.3: FIRST LAST MILE IMPROVEMENTS (GLENDORA AVE AND FOOTHILL BLVD.) Identify funding 2024 Q3 PW/ Finance/ CMO In-Process Working with SGVCOG on cost estimates and grants Public Outreach Ongoing Public Works / CMO In-Process
Complete Design - USACE 408 Permit - Environmental Clearance - Use Agreements / Easements
TBD Public Works In-Process LDW in process; have not started BDW - last phase Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Completion of survey will determine changes needed 2025 Q3 Public Works / PD Complete First reading was completed on 10/28; second reading scheduled for Nov.12, 2025.
Create a GIS Layer for signals 2025 Q4 Public Works / IT In-Process LA County completing work 2025 Q4 Public Works Complete Completed 2025 Q3 8 intersections for Cycle II - requesting funding from Caltrans 2027 Q2 Public Works In-Process Award for Construction November 12, 2025 Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Trash Discharge Prohibitions Compliance 2026 Q3 Public Works Not Started Will begin in 2026 Stormwater Master Plan 2026 Q1 Public Works In-Process Council Award scheduled for Nov 2025 Finkbiner Park Stormwater Capture Project TBD Public Works In-Process 100%Design Dec 2025 - Construction Start 2027 Q4 ACTION 4.4: LITTLE DALTON AND BIG DALTON WASH TRAIL
ACTION 4.8: HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT SAFETY PROGRAM
Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
Outcome 3: Traffic signal modernization
ACTION 4.5: TRAFFIC AND SPEED SURVEY
ACTION 4.6: COMPREHENSIVE SIGNAL INVENTORY
ACTION 4.7: SIX INTERSECTIONS IN THE PROCESS OF UPDATING Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
Outcome 4: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ACTION 4.9: MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed For Completion of a water infrastructure assessment and plan (Water Infrastructure Plan) 2025 Q4 Public Works In-Process Bids have been received and under evaluation. Award target 2026 Q1 Completion of plans, specifications and cost estimate 2026 Q1 Public Works In-Process Completion expected 2026 Q4 Complete Construction TBD Public Works / Finance Not Started Pending Identification of Funding Source Completion of plans, specifications and cost estimate, Complete Construction 2027 Q1 Public Works In-Process RFP expected Spring 2026, Construction Start June 2026, Completion before 2027 Q1
Completion of plans, specifications and cost estimate, Complete Construction 2027 Q1 Public Works In-Process RFP expected Spring 2026, Construction Start July 2026, Completion before 2027 Q1
Replace existing with new reservoir 2027 Q1 Public Works In-Process NOI issued / Closing 11/29. Bid out in 2026 Q1, Construction 2026 Q3/Q4 Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed Prepare Initial Five Year Plan 2025 Q4 Public Works In-Process In process; target complete date end of 2025 Q4 Identify and apply for funding opportunities Ongoing Public Works/RHS In-Process Currently staff is looing into current funding sources for the Transportation Division.
ACTION 4.16: PURSUE GRANT FUNDING FOR THE ACQUISITION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND INFRASTRUCTURE ACTION 4.17: PURSUE GRANT FUNDING TO EXPLAND AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE ACTION 4.15: DEVELOP A PLAN FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ALL CITY VEHICLES ACTION 4.12: COLORADO WATER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION 4.13: CYPRESS WATER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION 4.14: NORTH GLENDORA RESERVOIR
Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
Outcome 6: Modernization of the City's Fleet
Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
Outcome 5: Implemented Water Master Plan
ACTION 4.10: CONTRACT WITH A CONSULTANT
ACTION 4.11: GLENDORA WATER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Identify and apply for funding opportunities; issue RFP for deployment Ongoing Public Works Not Started Staff has attended meetings/webinars Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status
Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed
Prepare draft 2025 Q2 Human Resources Complete Draft Personnel Policies, and necessary GMC revisions were completed in August 2025.
Meet + confer with employee groups 2025 Q2 Human Resources In-Process Upcoming quarterly meetings with employee groups will continue progress.
Council approval 2025 Q4 Human Resources Not Started
MOU negotiations / new employee engagements 2025 Q2 CMO, Human Resources, Finance In-Process Three-Year AFSCME MOU approved on 10/14/25 for the period of 9/1/25 through 6/30/2028. GMA MOU negotiations are underway.
Public safety - professional staff MOU's 2025 Q4 CMO, Human Resources, Finance Complete Updated three year agreements with POA (6/10/25) and PMA (7/8/25) were approved by City Council. Each agreement runs from 7/1/25-6/30/28.
Hours of operation 2026 Q1
CMO-lead /
Admin/IT/PW/Finance/PD/Library/Comm. Dev/
Rec &HS/ City Clerk
In-Process
A citywide documentation process of locations and employee hours/community access is underway. Additionally, a Library has begun collecting detailed statistics on usage and staffing to review effectiveness of current hours of operation.
Develop an employee handbook 2026 Q1 Human Resources In-Process First draft has been completed; final draft anticipated by the end of March 2026.
ACTION 5.2: ASSESS SERVICE DELIVERY AND EMPLOYEE TOTAL COMPENSATION PACKAGE ACTION 5.3: FORMALIZE THE HUMAN RESOURCES LIFE CYCLE
Goal 5: Staff + Technology
Strengthen City operations through investment in staff and technology improvements.
Outcome 1: Stable Workforce
ACTION 5.1: UPDATE PERSONNEL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
Establish a formal employee orientation / on-boarding process 2025 Q4 Admin - HR - lead/
CMO/IT/PW/Finance/PD/Library/Comm. Dev/
Rec&HS/ City Clerk
In-Process
Citywide program framework is almost complete. PD has established a 40 hour Onboarding program which includes 18 to 26 topics (depending on classification), familiarization with all City departments, and family engagement.
Develop a Succession Plan to identify existing staff for additional development 2026 Q2 Admin - HR - lead/
CMO/IT/PW/Finance/PD/Library/Comm. Dev/
Rec&HS/ City Clerk
In-Process
Successful succession planning efforts have been completed in the Police, Community and Economic Development, and Recreation and Human Services Departments. A formal policy will be established to enable departments has been drafted based on ICMA's Comprehensive Guide to Local Government Succession Planning.
Conduct periodic employee surveys, both citywide and department specific, as needed 2025 Q3 Human Resources Complete
Survey assessments completed in Recreation and Human Services, Library, and through the Wellness program. Additional surveys will be developed and facilitated as needed.
Supervisory/ manager academy 2026 Q1 Human Resources In-Process HR has developed a series of management/supervisor training opportunities.
Executive Management Team has been encouraged to find ways for staff to participate.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status
Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed
Civic Access app/311 2026 Q2 IT In-Process Civic access app is in development and is mostly done. This will be complete in January when EAM goes live.
Deployment of city services kiosk 2026 Q3 IT In-Process Staff deployed service Kiosk computers in the permitting office. Part of this goal was to include Smart City Kiosks in The Village which doesn't look like it will happen in the short term due to costs.
Goal 5: Staff + Technology
Outcome 2: Accessible and enhanced City services
ACTION 5.4: DELIVER MORE CITY SERVICES USING TECHNOLOGY Citywide parking application 2025 Q4 IT/PD In-Process
Discussions with Park Mobile for placement of parking kiosk and associated costs; meeting on 10-22-25; Exploring options for citywide parking enforcement using LPR technology. Next meeting 10-30-25. Potential one-year contract extension with existing parking enforcement vendor to ensure no lapse in parking enforcement service at the end of the 2025 contract with option to retain existing vendor, in the event they are able to provide LPR enforcement. Awaiting quote from Intercon to determine if RFP is necessary for new parking enforcement vendor.
Completion of document imaging project, including standardized data entry standards, and unified management system 2026 Q2 City Clerk-PD/PW/Comm. Dev In-Process October 2025 Update: The Citywide Document Imaging and Digitization Project continues to progress on schedule.
Phase I – Foundational Implementation and Standardization (Completed):
The City Clerk’s Office has completed the citywide implementation of standardized data entry procedures, file naming conventions, and metadata protocols across all departments. Scanning workflows and protocols were finalized in coordination with Complete Paperless Solutions, LLC, establishing the foundation for consistent digitization and records management practices.
Phase II – Departmental Digitization and Integration (In Progress):
Digitization of legacy records is well underway.
- Police Department Records: All legacy records have been fully indexed and scanned. The complete dataset will be returned to the Police Department Records Division for quality control review on November 6, 2025. - Building and Development Plans: A comprehensive index has been created for all building plans. Plans from the Building Plan Room and Street Yard Pod have been inventoried, boxed, and are scheduled for pickup by the City’s scanning vendor on November 6, 2025 for processing.
Next Steps:
The upcoming milestones include cleaning and organizing Building Division property files, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) files, and Public Works property records, followed by their inventorying, indexing, boxing, and scanning.
ACTION 5.6: DEVELOP A FRAMEWORK FOR DATA UTILIZATION FOR DEVISION-MAKING (SMART CITY) ACTION 5.5: COMPLETE CITYWIDE DIGITIZATION EFFORTS
Development of draft framework for data utilization + 2026 Q4 IT In-Process Several GIS layers have been implemented across the City in various departments. These layers and applications are being utilized to accumulate and analyze data. Some of these layers include signs and maintenance, water, traffic, parks and utilities.
Council work session 2026 Q4 IT Not Started This project has not been started. Dashboard concepts will be designed by May of 2026.
Indicator/Action Timeline Lead Status
Notes: Revised Timeline / Notes About what was done and when it was completed
Operations specific information Go live of community dashboard 2026 Q4 All In-Process Community dashboard is in development.
Go live of community dashboard 2026 Q2 All In-Process Dashboard for community is set to go-live in March 2026 Go-live week 2025Q2 Comm. Dev / Public Works / Police / IT Complete Permitting has gone live, however there are tweaks in the configuration that have been requested for Permitting, building and engineering.
Public education provided in advance of Go live week 2025 Q2 Public Works / IT / Finance Complete Letter sent to customers prior to go live. Follow-up letter planned to provide update on login and new features with .
Successful Go live 2025 Q3 Public Works / IT / Finance Complete Go Live occurred in June 2025.
Public education provided in advance of Go live week 2025 Q3 Public Works / IT / Finance In-Process IT will provide a video tutorial published on the City website and Social Media if available explaining the process of how to use 311 and the City app.
Successful Go live 2025 Q3 Public Works / IT / Finance Not Started Open Finance Go Live 2026 Q1 Finance / Admin / IT In-Process Preliminary website developed. Finance provided preview to City Manager's Office and received feedback for updates.
Capital Project Explorer Go Live 2026 Q2 Finance/ PW / IT In-Process Early information gathered during FY2025-27 Budget process with new CIP sheets.
ACTION 5.11: TYLER IMPLEMENTATION - ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING Goal 5: Staff + Technology
Outcome 3: Completed software implementation
ACTION 5.7: INCREASE THE NUMBER OF GIS LAYERS AND APPLICATIONS ACTION 5.8: TYLER IMPLEMENTATION - ENTERPRISE PERMITTING AND LICENSING ACTION 5.9: TYLER IMPLEMENTATIONS - UTILITY BILLING
ACTION 5.10: TYLER IMPLEMENTATION - ENTERPRISE ASSEST MANAGEMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: November 12, 2025
FROM: Finance DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Adopt a Master Schedule of Fees for Services and a User Fee Cost Recovery Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the City of Glendora’s User Fee Study; and
1. Adopt the User Fee Cost Recovery Policy; and
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR SERVICE."
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 2: Maintain Financial Stability and Sustainability (MFSS)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendora engaged Matrix Consulting Group to prepare a comprehensive Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study to ensure that the City’s fees for services accurately reflect the cost of providing those services. The study provides a detailed review of both direct and indirect costs associated with City operations and establishes a fair methodology for distributing overhead costs to departments.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66016, a public hearing is required prior to the adoption of new or adjusted user fees. This report seeks City Council consideration and approval of the Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study following the required public hearing.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
The last comprehensive User Fee study was conducted in 2003. On April 22, 2025, the City entered into an agreement with Matrix Consulting Group to conduct a Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study. On September 23, 2025, staff presented an informational update to the City Council regarding the results of the study and receive direction on the implementation of the proposed fee adjustments.
DISCUSSION
On April 22, 2025, the City entered into an agreement with Matrix Consulting Group to conduct a Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study. On September 23, 2025, staff presented an informational update to the City Council regarding the results of the study and receive direction on the implementation of the proposed fee adjustments.
Periodic updates ensure compliance, transparency, and fiscal responsibility.
Based on the City Council's recommendations and drection, Matrix Consulting prepared the final report for staff review in mid-October. The Cost Allocation Plan identifies the full cost of central services and allocates these costs to operating departments using measurable allocation factors (e.g., number of employees, budget size, or transactions). The accompanying User Fee Study evaluates each fee-based service provided by the City, calculating the actual cost to deliver the service and recommending updated fee amounts to achieve the desired cost recovery level established by Council policy.
The User Fee Study provides a transparent, data-driven foundation for the City’s Master Schedule of Fees for Service and ensures compliance with applicable laws governing the establishment of fees. This public hearing represents the final step prior to the Council’s consideration of formal adoption of he Master Schedule of Fees.
Public notice for this hearing was provided in accordance with statutory requirements. Following the hearing, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Master Schedule of Fees for Service by resolution and authorize implementation of the updated fees, effective January 1, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the Master Schedule of Fees for Service will enable the City to closely recover the costs associated with providing services to the public. Adjusting fees to reflect true service costs will help maintain the City’s financial sustainability and reduce General Fund subsidies for activities that primarily benefit individual users rather than the community as a whole. The proposed fee adjustments are estimated to recover approximately $1.2 Million annually; the City's adopted 2025-2027 Two-Year budget anticipates the adoption of this fee study as associated revenues.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There are no CEQA impacts associated with the recommendations in this report.
Prepared By: Desiree Valdivia, Office Coordinator
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Marie Ricci, Deputy City Manager
Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_Presentation_of_Master_Schedule_of_Fees_for_Service.pdf B. Comprehensive User Fee Study Report
C. Proposed Master Schedule of Fees for Service
D_User_Fee_Cost_Recovery_Policy_-_Draft.pdf
E_Resolution_CC_2025-.pdf
F. Public Hearing Notice
G. Proof of Publication - San Gabriel Valley Examiner
H. Proof of Publication - San Gabriel Valley Tribune
PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT A MASTER SCHEDULE OF
FEES FOR SERVICE AND A USER FEE COST RECOVERY
POLICY
FINANCE DIVISION
CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 12, 2025
PURPOSE
• To adopt the City’s Master Schedule of Fees for Service and formalize the User Fee Cost Recovery Policy following completion of the Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study.
• Align fees with the true cost of services.
• Ensure compliance and fiscal transparency.
• Support long-term financial sustainability.
HISTORY
• The last comprehensive was completed in 2003.
• Select fees have been adjusted periodically to maintain compliance, transparency, and fiscal responsibility.
• On April 22, 2025, the City entered into an agreement with Matrix Consulting Group to prepare a Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study.
• Departments actively participated throughout the process, meeting with the consultant to review data, cost drivers, and draft findings. • On September 23, 2025, staff presented preliminary findings to the City Council. • The final study and recommended updates are now presented for City Council consideration following the required public hearing.
USER FEE COST RECOVERY POLICY OVERVIEW
• Establishes a consistent framework for setting and maintaining user fees. • Ensures fees reflect the cost of providing City services. • Promotes transparency, fairness, and accountability.
• Balances cost recovery with community benefit and equity. • Assigns clear roles: Finance, Departments, City Manager, and Council. • Requires regular review and updates, including comprehensive studies every 3–5 years
FEE STUDY FINDINGS & UPDATES
• Overall cost recovery for fee-based services: 67%
• Strong cost recovery: Building, Engineering, Environmental Services • Low cost recovery areas: Recreation, Library, Police
• Fees mostly unchanged due to community service focus. • Updates align fees with actual costs, promoting fairness, transparency, and fiscal sustainability
Cost Recovery Analysis
Dept / Div Revenue Cost Difference Cost Recovery
Building $1,381,145 $1,682,861 ($301,717) 82%
Engineering $438,381 $637,465 ($199,083) 69%
Env. Services $67,510 $100,325 ($32,815) 67%
Finance $110,048 $183,876 ($73,828) 60%
Library $32,690 $66,829 ($34,139) 49%
Planning $238,622 $389,291 ($150,669) 61%
Police $289,449 $522,247 ($232,798) 55%
Rec & Human Svcs $59,320 $312,420 ($253,100) 19%
Water $120,040 $212,856 ($92,816) 56%
Total $2,737,206 $4,108,170 ($1,370,964) 67%
Service Area Revenue at Current Fee Revenue at Full Cost Max Revenue Increase Current Cost Recover Revenue at Proposed Fee Projected Revenue Change Projected Cost Recovery Building $1,380,947 $1,629,828 $248,881 85% $1,614,263 $233,317 99% Economic Development $4,600 $13,585 $8,985 34% $13,560 $8,960 100% Engineering $438,381 $626,802 $188,420 70% $625,821 $187,439 100% Environmental Services $67,510 $100,218 $32,708 67% $99,310 $31,800 99% Finance $110,048 $183,807 $73,759 60% $167,695 $57,647 91% Library $32,690 $63,949 $31,259 51% $32,690 $0 51%
Planning $238,622 $380,739 $142,117 63% $296,771 $58,148 78% Police $289,449 $520,205 $230,756 56% $301,704 $12,255 58% Recreation & Human Services $59,320 $312,420 $253,100 19% $59,320 $0 19% Water $120,040 $212,856 $92,816 56% $120,040 $0 56%
Total $2,741,608 $4,044,409 $1,302,801 68% $3,331,175 $589,567 82%
PROPOSED REVENUE IMPACTS
NEXT STEPS & IMPLEMENTATION
• Adopt Master Schedule of Fees and Cost Recovery Policy. • Update fee schedules in City systems and public documents. • Implement fees on January 1, 2026.
• Conduct annual review to maintain compliance.
• Plan next comprehensive study (every 3–5 years)
RECOMMENDATION
• That the City Council
• Adopt the User Fee Cost Recovery Policy; and
• Adopt a City Council Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE MASTER SCHEDULE FEES FOR SERVICE.”
GLENDORA, CA
COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE
STUDY REPORT
FINAL REPORT
September 2025
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
LEGAL FRAMEWORK 4
USER FEE STUDY METHODOLOGY 7
RESULTS OVERVIEW 9
BUILDING & SAFETY 10
ENGINEERING 17
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 22
FINANCE 24
LIBRARY 26
PLANNING 28
POLICE 32
RECREATION 35
WATER 39
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SURCHARGES 42
COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS 45
APPENDIX – COMPARATIVE SURVEY 49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 1
The report, which follows, presents the results of the Comprehensive User Fee study conducted by Matrix Consulting Group for the City of Glendora, California.
PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
The City of Glendora has not conducted a formal fee analysis in over 10 years. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and determine the full cost (direct and indirect) of providing a variety of city services. The Matrix Consulting Group analyzed the cost-of-service relationships that exist between fees for service activities in the following areas: Building, Engineering, Environmental Services, Finance, Library, Planning, Police, Recreation & Human Services, and Utilities. The results of this study provide a tool for understanding current service levels and the cost for those services.
GENERAL PROJECT APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
The methodology employed by Matrix Consulting Group is a widely accepted “bottom up” approach to cost analysis, where time spent per unit of fee activity is determined for each position within a Department or Program. Once time spent for a fee activity is determined, all applicable City costs are then considered in the calculation of the “full” cost of providing each service. The following table provides an overview of types of costs applied in establishing the “full” cost of services provided by the City:
TABLE 1: OVERVIEW OF COST COMPONENTS
Cost Component Description
Direct Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budgeted salaries, benefits, and allowable expenditures.
Indirect Division, departmental, clerical, and Citywide support.
Together, the cost components in the table above comprise the calculation of the total “full” cost of providing a service, regardless of whether a fee for that service is charged. The work accomplished by Matrix Consulting Group in the analysis of the proposed fees for service involved the following steps:
• Department / Program Staff Interviews: The project team interviewed department / program staff regarding their needs for clarification to the structure of existing fee items or for addition of new fee items.
• Data Collection: Data was collected for each permit / service, including time estimates. In addition, all budgeted costs and staffing levels for Fiscal Year 2025-26 were entered into Matrix Consulting Group’s analytical software model.
• Cost Analysis: The full cost of providing each service included in the analysis was established.
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 2
• Review and Approval of Results with City Staff: Department management has reviewed and approved these documented results.
A more detailed description of user fee methodology and legal and policy considerations are provided in subsequent chapters of this report.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
When comparing fee-related revenue with the calculated total annual cost, the City is under-recovering its costs by approximately $1.37 million or recovering 67% of its costs. The following table shows the revenue collected, the total annual cost, the resulting difference, and the resulting cost recovery percentage by major division.
TABLE 2: ANNUAL COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS
Division
Fee-Related
Revenue
Fee-Related
Cost Difference
Cost
Recovery %
Building $1,381,145 $1,682,861 ($301,717) 82%
Engineering $438,381 $637,465 ($199,083) 69%
Environmental Services $67,510 $100,325 ($32,815) 67%
Finance $110,048 $183,876 ($73,828) 60%
Library $32,690 $66,829 ($34,139) 49%
Planning $238,622 $389,291 ($150,669) 61%
Police $289,449 $522,247 ($232,798) 55%
Recreation & Human Services $59,320 $312,420 ($253,100) 19% Water $120,040 $212,856 ($92,816) 56%
Total $2,737,206 $4,108,170 ($1,370,964) 67%
The largest deficit is in relation to Building fees and is due to building permit and plan check fees for valuation-based projects. Other large deficits are related to Recreation, due to field rental fees, and Police, caused by carry concealed weapon permits.
The differences highlight the disparity between current fees charged and the actual cost of providing services. As such, the City should closely evaluate and modify fees where appropriate to help bridge the cost-recovery gap.
The detailed documentation of this study will show an over-collection for some fees (on a per unit basis) and an undercharge for most others. The results of this analysis will provide the Department and the City with guidance on how to right-size their fees to ensure that each service unit is set at an amount that does not exceed the full cost of providing that service. The display of the cost recovery figures shown in this report are meant to provide a basis for policy development discussions among City Councilmembers and City staff and do not represent a recommendation for where or how the City Council should act. The setting of the “rate” or “price” for services, whether at full cost recovery or lower, is a policy decision to be made only by the City Council with input from City staff and the community.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 3
CONSIDERATIONS FOR COST RECOVERY POLICY AND UPDATES
The Matrix Consulting Group recommends that the City use the information contained in this report to discuss, adopt, and implement a formal Cost Recovery Policy, including a mechanism for the annual update of fees for service.
ADOPT A FORMAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
The Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) best practices for Establishing Government Charges and Fees states that governmental entities should adopt formal policies regarding charges and fees which include the jurisdiction’s intention to recover the full cost or partial costs of providing services, sets forth circumstances under which the jurisdiction might set a charge for fee at less than or more than 100% of full cost, and outlines the considerations that might influence the jurisdiction’s pricing decision.
The Matrix Consulting Group strongly recommends that the Council adopt a formalized, individual cost recovery policy for each service area included in this Study. Whenever a cost recovery policy is established at less than 100% of the full cost of providing services, a known gap in funding is recognized and may then potentially be recovered through other revenue sources. The Matrix Consulting Group considers a formalized cost recovery policy for various fees for service an industry Best Management Practice.
ADOPT AN ANNUAL FEE UPDATE / INCREASE MECHANISM
GFOA best practices for Establishing Government Charges and Fees states that governmental entities should review, and update charges and fees periodically based on factors such as the impact of inflation, other cost increases, adequacy of cost recovery, use of services, and the competitiveness of current rates to avoid large infrequent fee increases.
The purpose of a comprehensive update is to completely revisit the analytical structure, service level estimates and assumptions, and to account for any major shifts in cost components or organizational structures that have occurred since the City’s previous analysis. It’s recommended the City establish a practice of conducting comprehensive analyses every five to seven years as this practice captures any changes to organizational structure, processes, as well as any new service areas.
In between comprehensive updates, the City should continue to utilize published industry economic factors such as Consumer Price Index (CPI) or other regional factors to update the cost calculations established in the Study on an annual basis.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 4
This section of the report is intended to provide an overview of the legal rules and regulations that govern what is considered a fee for service, how those fees can be calculated, general principles, philosophies, and general policy considerations for setting fees for service.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
A “user fee” is a charge for service provided by a governmental agency to a public citizen or group.
California has several Government Codes and Propositions that regulate fees for service, with the purpose of ensuring that fees are reasonable and justified. The most prominent and relevant of these includes:
• Proposition 26: Passed in 2010, specifically outlined the difference between a fee and a tax and dictates that fees must be directly related to a service and cannot exceed the reasonable cost of that service.
• Government Code § 50076: clarifies that fees for service costs are not special taxes and do not need voter approval.
• Government Code § 65104: gives local governments the authority to charge planning and zoning fees to recover processing costs.
When determining fees for service it is important to ensure there is a direct benefit – the service is provided directly to the payer, and that it is cost based, and does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE
While Proposition 26 defines what constitutes a user fee, and how those fees can be determined, it also provides a key exception for fees charged for facility or property rentals. This exception outlines that fees for use of government property (e.g., renting public buildings, parks, or event spaces) are voluntary transactions. Therefore, governments can charge market-based rental fees for these services.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND PHILOSOPHIES REGARDING USER FEES Local governments are providers of many types of general services to their communities. While all services provided by local government are beneficial to constituents, some services can be classified as globally beneficial to all citizens, while others provide more of a direct benefit to a specific group or individual. The following table provides examples of services provided by local government within a continuum of the degree of community benefit received:
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 5
TABLE 3: SERVICES IN RELATION TO BENEFIT RECEIVED
Funding for local government is obtained from myriad revenue sources such as taxes, fines, grants, special charges, user fees, etc. In recent years, alternative tax revenues, which typically offset subsidies for services provided to the community, have become increasingly limited. These limitations have caused increased attention on user fee activities as a revenue source that can offset costs otherwise subsidized (usually) by the general fund. In Table 3, services in the “global community benefit” section tend to be funded primarily through voter-approved tax revenues. In the middle of the table, one typically finds a mixture of taxes, user fees, and other funding sources. Finally, in the “individual / group benefit” section of the table are the services provided by local government that are typically funded almost entirely by user fee revenue.
The following are two central concepts regarding the establishment of user fees:
v Fees should be assessed according to the degree of individual or private benefit gained from services. For example, the processing and approval of a land use or building permit will generally result in monetary gain to the applicant, whereas Police services and Fire Suppression are examples of services that are essential to the safety of the community at large. v A profit-making objective should not be included in the assessment of user fees. In fact, California laws require that the charges for service be in direct proportion to the costs associated with providing those services. Once a charge for service is assessed at a level higher than the actual cost of providing a service, the term “user fee” no longer applies. The charge then becomes a tax subject to voter approval.
Therefore, it is commonly accepted that user fees are established at a level that will recover up to, and not more than, the cost of providing a particular service.
GENERAL POLICY CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING USER FEES
Undoubtedly, there are programs, circumstances, and services that justify a subsidy from a tax-based or alternative revenue source. However, it is essential that jurisdictions prioritize the use of revenue sources for the provision of services based on the continuum of benefit received. "Global" Community Benefit
•Police
•Park Maintenance
•Fire Suppression
"Global" Benefit and an
Individual or Group Benefit
•Recreation / Community
Services
•Fire Prevention
Individual or Group Benefit
•Building Permits
•Planning and Zoning
Approval
•Engineering Development
Review
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 6
Within the services that are typically funded by user fees, the Matrix Consulting Group recognizes several reasons why City staff or City Council may not advocate the full cost recovery of services. The following factors are key policy considerations in setting fees at less than 100 percent of cost recovery:
• Limitations posed by an external agency. The State or an outside agency will occasionally set a maximum, minimum, or limit on the jurisdiction’s ability to charge a fee. Examples includes time spent copying and retrieving public documents and / or transportation permits. • Encouragement of desired behaviors. Keeping fees for certain services below full cost recovery may provide better compliance from the community. For example, if the cost of a permit for changing a water heater in a residential home is higher than the cost of the water heater itself, many citizens will avoid pulling the permit.
• Benefit received by user of the service and the community at large is mutual. Many services that directly benefit a group or individual equally benefit the community. Examples include Planning Design Review, historical dedications, and certain types of special events.
The Matrix Consulting Group recognizes the need for policies that intentionally subsidize certain activities. The primary goals of a User Fee Study are to provide a fair and equitable basis for determining the costs of providing services and ensure that the City complies with State law.
SUMMARY OF LEGAL RESTRICTIONS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Once the full cost of providing services is known, the next step is to determine the “rate” or “price” for services at a level which is up to, and not more than, the full cost amount. The City Council is responsible for this decision, which often becomes a question of balancing service levels and funding sources. The placement of a service or activity within the continuum of benefit received may require extensive discussion and at times fall into a “grey area.” However, with the resulting cost of services information from a User Fee Study, the City Council can be assured that the adopted fee for service is reasonable, fair, and legal. Overall, city staff has reviewed all fees for service in this analysis and where subsidies were identified, they recommended increases where appropriate to reduce the deficit; and where overrecoveries were identified, reduced the fee to comply with the law.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 7
The Matrix Consulting Group utilizes a cost allocation methodology commonly known and accepted as the “bottom-up” approach to establishing User Fees. The term means that several cost components are calculated for each fee or service. These components then build upon each other to comprise the total cost for providing the service. The following chart describes the components of a full cost calculation:
The following subsections discuss the two components of the basis of the full cost.
TIME ESTIMATION
Utilization of time estimates is a reasonable and defensible approach, especially since experienced staff members who understand service levels and processes unique to the City developed these estimates.
The project team worked closely with City staff in developing time estimates with the following criteria:
• Estimates are representative of average times for providing services. Extremely difficult or abnormally simple projects are not factored in the analysis.
• Estimates reflect the time associated with the position or positions that typically perform a service. • Estimates are reviewed by the project team for “reasonableness” against their experience with other agencies.
• Estimates were not based on time in motion studies, as they are not practical for the scope of services and time frame for this project.
• Estimates match the current or proposed staffing levels to ensure there is no over-allocation of staff resources to fee and non-fee related activities.
The Matrix Consulting Group agrees that while the use of time estimates is not perfect, it is the best alternative available for setting a standard level of service on which to base a jurisdiction’s fees for service and meets the requirements of California law.
The alternative to time estimating is actual time tracking, often referred to billing on a “time and materials” basis. Except in the case of anomalous or very large and complex projects, Matrix Consulting Group believes this approach to not be cost effective or reasonable for the following reasons:
TIME ASSUMPTION
(by position)
FULLY BURDENED
HOURLY RATE Total Cost
USER FEE STUDY METHODOLOGY
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 8
• Accuracy in time tracking is compromised by the additional administrative burden required to track, bill, and collect for services in this manner.
• Additional costs are associated with administrative staff’s billing, refunding, and monitoring deposit accounts.
• Customers often prefer to know the fees for services in advance of applying for permits or participating in programs.
• Departments can better predict revenue streams and staff needs using standardized time estimates and anticipated permit volumes.
Situations arise where the size and complexity of a given project warrants time tracking and billing on a “time and materials” basis. The Matrix Consulting Group has recommended taking a deposit and charging Actual Costs for such fees as appropriate and itemized within the current fee schedule.
FULLY BURDENED HOURLY RATES
The fully burdened hourly rates calculated through this study include the following components:
• Salaries: FY25-26 Budgeted salaries were utilized and consolidated at the positional level. • Benefits: FY25-26 Budgeted benefits were utilized and consolidated at the positional level. • Productive Hours: Based on Glendora’s current personnel system rules, working or productive hours were calculated. This means taking the starting total working hours and reducing the hours by vacation, sick, holidays, training, and administrative leave based on each bargaining unit • Departmental / Divisional Overhead: This captures any internal service charges or operating supply costs such as vehicles, supplies, etc. Additionally, this component includes the cost associated with support from Director, Administrative and Analytical staff that do not directly work on fees. • Citywide Overhead: This captures support provided by the City Council, City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance, and Human Resources. The costs are based on the Citywide Cost Allocation Plan (provided under separate cover).
Together these components result in the generation of fully burdened hourly rates by position / classification and / or department / division. These rates were multiplied against the time assumptions to calculate the full cost of services noted in this report.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 9
The motivation behind a cost of services (User Fee) analysis is for City Council and Departmental staff to maintain services at a level that is both accepted and effective for the community and to maintain control over the policy and management of these services.
It should be noted that the results presented in this report are not a precise measurement. In general, a cost-of-service analysis takes a “snapshot in time,” where a fiscal year of financial and operational information is utilized. Changes to the structure of fee names, along with the use of time estimates, allow only for a reasonable projection of subsidies and revenue. Consequently, City Council and Department staff should rely conservatively upon these estimates to gauge the impact of implementation going forward.
Discussion of results in the following chapters is intended as a summary of extensive and voluminous cost allocation documentation produced during the Study. Each chapter will include detailed cost calculation results for each fee including the following:
• Modifications: discussions regarding any proposed revisions to the current fee schedule, including elimination or addition of fees.
• “Per Unit” Results: comparison of the full cost of providing each unit of service to the current fee for each unit of service (where applicable).
• Annualized Results: utilizing volume of activity estimates, annual subsidies, and revenue impacts were projected where workload was available.
The full analytical results were provided to City staff under separate cover from this summary report.
RESULTS OVERVIEW
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 10
The Building and Safety Division is part of Community Development Department. The Building & Safety Division performs plan reviews, inspections, permit issuances, and ensures that all new construction and buildings occupancies are in line with the current health and safety standards as well as the California building standards code. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by the Building & Safety Division.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with Building and Safety Division, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating the following fees, as these services are no longer offered by City staff, covered under other fees, or are now offered by other departments within the City:
o ‘Saddle Main Line’
o ‘Excavation (Under Sidewalk/Public Improvement)’
o ‘Pea Trap’
o ‘Ventilation System’
o ‘Overflow Seepage Pit Drain Field Ext.’
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees, to capture services already provided but not codified or new services being provided:
o ‘Bathroom Remodel / Kitchen Remodel (no structural changes)’ o ‘EV Charging Station’
o ‘Battery Backup’
o ‘Residential HVAC Replacement’
o ‘Swimming Pool / Spa’
o ‘Commercial Kitchen Hood & Exhaust System’
o ‘Minimum Permit Fee’ for Building, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing. o ‘Additional Building Plan Check Fee’
o ‘Mechanical, Electrical, or Plumbing Plan Check Fee’
o ‘Sewer Plan Check Fee’
BUILDING & SAFETY
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 11
• Expanded Fees: Staff proposed expanding the building valuation schedule from beyond $1,000,000 to be tiered all the way up to $25,000,000 and exponentially increase thereafter. This better captures the development environment in the City of Glendora.
• Consolidated Fees: Staff proposed the following consolidations to the fee schedule:
o Receptacles, Lights / Switches were consolidated into a singular category to be each – rather than based on ranges.
o ‘Motors with a Combined and Not Combined Rating over were combined into a singular fee category
o ‘Vented Decorative Appliance’, ‘Up to 100,000 BTU Up to 1,000,000 BTU’, and ‘Over 1,000,000 BTU’ were consolidated into the following fees ‘Refrigeration Compressor’, ‘Absorption Unit’, ‘Fuel Burning Heater or Furnace’, and Boiler’) o ‘Air Handling Unit’, ‘Up to 2,000 CFM Up to 10,000 CFM Over’, and ‘10,000 CFM’, were consolidated into a single fee ‘Air Handling Unit’.
o ‘Ranges/Clothes Dryers/ Water Heaters/Other Outlets’ and ‘Dishwasher/Stationary Cooktop/ Stationary Appliance’ was consolidated into a single fee ‘Fixed Appliances & Dedicated Outlets (Ranges, Dryers, Water Heaters, Cooktops, Dishwashers, etc.)’ • Modified Fees: Staff proposed the modification of the following fees, to better reflect the services offered by the City:
o ‘Battery Backup’ was changed to ‘Energy Storage System (ESS)’ to more accurately reflect the services offered.
o ‘Carnival’ was changed to ‘Carnival Ride / Attraction’ to more accurately reflect the services offered.
o ‘Gas System’ was changed to ‘Gas System (Includes up to 5 Outlets)’ to more accurately reflect the services offered.
o ‘Refrigeration Compressor, Absorption Unit, or Fuel Burning Heater, Boiler, Furnace;’ was broken out into the following fees, ‘Refrigeration Compressor’, ‘Absorption Unit’, ‘Fuel Burning Heater or Furnace’, ‘and ‘Boiler’ to more accurately reflect the services offered. o ‘House Sewer Connecting to Public Sewer’ was changed to ‘Building Sewer Connection to Public Sewer’ to more accurately reflect the services offered. o ‘Septic Tank Seepage Pit Drain Field Ext.’ was changed to ‘Septic Tank, Seepage Pit, or Drain Field (Per Unit)’ to more accurately reflect the services offered. o ‘Alter, Repair or Abandon House Sewer’ was changed to ‘Alter, Repair or Abandon Building Sewer’ to more accurately reflect the services offered. o ‘Not over 200 Amp’ was changed to ‘Not Over 225 Amp’ to more accurately reflect the services offered.
o ‘Over 200 Amp’ was changed to ‘Over 225 Amp’ to more accurately reflect the services offered.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 12
The modifications noted ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services being provided by Building and Safety staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Building and Safety Division collects fees for plan checks, building permits, application fees, combo permits, electrical permits, plumbing permits, mechanical permits, sewer permits, and other permits like change of occupancy, lost inspection cards, and solar. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs, Divisional, Departmental, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 4: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – BUILDING & SAFETY Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Intake Processing $25 $31 ($6)
Building Permit Application Fee
$1 to $500 $23.50 $128.65 ($105.15)
$501 to $2,000
First $500 $23.50 $128.65 ($105.15)
Each Additional $100 $3.05 $5.31 ($2.26)
$2,001 to $25,000
First $2,000 $69.25 $208.26 ($139.01)
Each additional $1,000 $14.00 $17.04 ($3.04)
$25,001 to $50,000
First $25,000 $391.25 $600.07 ($208.82)
Each additional $1,000 $10.10 $14.21 ($4.11)
$50,001 to $100,000
First $50,000 $643.75 $955.42 ($311.67)
Each additional $1,000 $7.00 $8.21 ($1.21)
$100,001 to $500,000
First $100,000 $993.75 $1,366.08 ($372.33)
Each additional $1,000 $5.60 $4.92 $0.68
$500,001 to $1,000.000
First $500,000 $3,233.75 $3,332.23 ($98.48)
Each additional $1,000 $4.75 $4.56 $0.19
$1,000,000 to $5,000,000
First $1,000,000 $5,608.75 $5,610.16 ($1.41)
Each additional $1,000 $3.15 $0.57 $2.58
$5,000,000 to $10,000,000
First $5,000,000 Modified $7,888.09 N/A
Each additional $1,000 Modified $0.54 N/A
$10,000,000 to $25,000,000
First $10,000,000 Modified $10,608.50 N/A
Each additional $1,000 Modified $0.40 N/A
$25,000,000+
First $25,000,000 Modified $16,661.13 N/A
Each additional $1,000 Modified $0.20 N/A
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 13
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Building Plan Check Fee
Building Plan Check Fee 65% 65% 0%
Additional Building Plan Check Fee New $213 N/A
Mechanical, Electrical, or Plumbing Plan Check Fee New $213 N/A Sewer Plan Check Fee New $213 N/A
Building Permit Fees - Other Inspections and Fees
Inspections outside of normal business
hours (minimum charge - two hours) $94 $146 ($52)
Re-inspection fees assessed under
provisions of the California Building Code $94 $122 ($28) Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated minimum charge - one half hour) $94 $122 ($28)
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions on plans (minimum charge - one half hour) $94 $213 ($119) For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both Actual Cost
Other Building permit Application fees
Building Address Processing w/o Map $555 $432 $123
Building Investigation $85 $327 ($242)
Building Permit Surcharge for NPDES (SWPPP) Inspections 5% 5% 0% Building Re-Address Processing $555 $432 $123
Building Re-inspection $70 $177 ($107)
Change of Occupancy $185 $945 ($760)
Lost Inspection Card $42 $116 ($74)
Temporary Occupancy Review $225 $452 ($227)
Combo Permits - Single Family Residential
Bathroom Remodel / Kitchen Remodel (no structural changes) New $300 N/A EV Charging Station New $177 N/A
Energy Storage System (ESS) New $307 N/A
Residential HVAC Replacement New $235 N/A
Swimming Pool / Spa New $1,161 N/A
Electrical Permit Application
Receptacles/Lights/Switches $1.40 $4.08 ($2.68)
Fixed Appliances & Dedicated Outlets (Ranges, Dryers, Water Heaters, Cooktops, Dishwashers, etc.) $5.65 $8.16 ($2.51) Motors Modified $40 N/A
Signs $56.35 $91 ($34.65)
Timers $14.10 $48 ($33.90)
Service 0-600V
Not Over 225 Amp $70.27 $122.36 ($52.09)
Over 225 amp $56.35 $152 ($95.65)
New Dwellings $0.07 $0.10 ($0.03)
Temporary Power Poles $28.25 $122 ($93.75)
Temporary Distribution Poles $14.10 $61 ($46.90)
Carnival Ride / Attraction $23.50 $61 ($37.50)
Swimming Pool/Spas $61.35 $183 ($121.65)
Where No Fee is Set $75 $91 ($16)
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 14
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Minimum Permit Fee New $122 N/A
Issuance Fee Per Permit $42 $55 ($13)
Plumbing Permit Application
Toilet $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Bath Tub $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Shower $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Wash Basin $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Kitchen Sink $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Dishwasher $15 $30 ($15)
Laundry Tub or Tray $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Automatic Washer $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Water Heater $40.57 $61 ($20.43)
Solar Water Heater $31.50 $122 ($90.50)
Water Softener $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Gas System (up to 5 Outlets) $15 $61 ($46)
Additional Gas Outlet Over 5 $2.65 $12 ($9.35)
Floor Drain $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Lawn Sprinkler System $17 $61 ($44)
Misc. Water Piping $15 $61 ($46)
Swimming Pool Piping $24.25 $91 ($66.75)
Where No Fee is Set $75 $91 ($16)
Minimum Permit Fee New $122 N/A
Issuance Fee Per Permit $42 $55 ($13)
Mechanical Permit Application
Refrigeration Compressor Modified $91 N/A
Absorption Unit Modified $91 N/A
Boiler Modified $91 N/A
Fuel Burning Heater or Furnace Modified $91 N/A
Air Handling Unit Modified $91 N/A
Air Inlet or Outlet $7.90 $15 ($7.10)
Appliance Vent (not included above) $7.90 $42 ($34.10)
Evaporative Cooler $12.80 $91 ($78.20)
Ventilation Fans $11.30 $30 ($18.70)
Residential Kitchen Hood & Exhaust System $39 $61 ($22) Commercial Kitchen Hood & Exhaust System New $91 N/A
Spray Booth, Exhaust System $39 $122 ($83)
Fire Dampers $7.50 $91 ($83.50)
Alter Duct System (not included above) $18.50 $91 ($72.50) Where No Fee is Set $75 $91 ($16)
Minimum Permit Fee New $122 N/A
Issuance Fee Per Permit $42 $55 ($13)
Sewer Permit Application
Building Sewer Connection to Public Sewer $56.75 $122 ($65.25) Septic Tank, Seepage Pit, or Drain Field $84.75 $214 ($129.25) Connect Additional Building/Work $28.25 $122 ($93.75)
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 15
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Alter, Repair or Abandon Building Sewer $28.25 $122 ($93.75) Grease Interceptor $56.75 $183 ($126.25)
Where No Fee is Set $75 $122 ($47)
Minimum Permit Fee New $122 N/A
Issuance Fee Per Permit $42 $55 ($13)
Other Permits
Building Re-inspection $72 $177 ($105)
Investigation $170 $327 ($157)
Lost Inspection Card $42 $116 ($74)
Commercial Solar
50kw or Less $1,000 $1,218 ($218)
50-250kW (Base) $1,000 $1,218 ($218)
50-250kW (per kW above 50 kW) $7 $5 $2
250 kW (Base) $2,400 $2,271 $129
250 kW (per kW above 250 kW) $5 $4 $1
Residential Solar:
Base $500 $559 ($59)
Per Kw above 15Kw $15 $16 ($1)
The fees administered by the Building and Safety Division generally under-recover for its services. For Building Permit fees, the most significant deficit is in relation to the ‘$100,001 to $500,000’ base fee at $372.33.
For Permits outside the Building Permit fee category, the most significant deficit is in relation to the ‘Change of Occupancy’ under the Other Building Permit Application Fees category at $760. The smallest under recovery is for the ‘New Dwellings’ under the Electrical Permit Application category at $0.03 per square foot.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Building and Safety has a deficit of roughly $302,000.
The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 5: ANNUAL RESULTS – BUILDING AND SAFETY
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Building Valuation-Based Fees $1,160,447 $1,420,565 ($260,118) Other Inspections and Fees $925 $4,725 ($3,800)
Combo Permits - Single Family Residential $104,528 $82,132 $22,396 Electrical Permit Application $23,149 $42,114 ($18,966) Plumbing Permit Application $18,817 $39,929 ($21,112)
Mechanical Permit Application $8,871 $10,752 ($1,882)
Sewer Permit Application $11,447 $24,213 ($12,766)
Other Permits $52,962 $58,431 ($5,469)
Total $1,381,145 $1,682,861 ($301,717)
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 16
Building and Safety has an annual cost recovery of roughly 82%. The largest source of this deficit is the valuation-based fees at $260,000. The primary source of that deficit is plan check fees. Even though the plan check rate doesn’t change, the change in the building permit fee, results in a large deficit for plan check fees. Reviewing and right-sizing these fees is critical to help achieving higher cost recovery.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 17
The Engineering Division is part of the Public Works Department. The Engineering Division is responsible for developing and maintaining long term infrastructure development and replacement projects, CIP, and conducting plan checks for improvements and grading plans. The following sections discuss fee schedule modifications and detailed per unit results for the fee-related services associated with Engineering.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating the ‘Newsrack Registration (Per Rack)’ as this service is no longer offered by the City.
• Modified Fees: Staff proposed modifying the ‘3rd Party Consultants’ from a flat fee to a per hour fee to better reflect the services offered by the City.
• Consolidated Fees: Staff proposed the following consolidations to the fee schedule:
o The ‘Single-Family / ADU’ and ‘Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial’ were consolidated into ‘1 acre or more’ under SWPPP Review Fee. o The ‘Flat Fee for Review (Includes First and Second Submittals)’ was consolidated into a single deposit under Administrative Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - Small Wireless Facilities.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services being provided by Engineering staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Engineering Division collects fees for parcel map/tract map developments, drainage related inspections and reviews, encroachment permits, plan checks, driveway approach permits, excavation permits, curb, gutter, sidewalk & paving permits, sewer permits, right of way, and other miscellaneous fees like waste disposal/cleanup and quitclaims. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Division and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 6: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – ENGINEERING
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Street Name Signs $310 $418 ($108)
Traffic Signs $300 $1,112 ($812)
Street Lights (Administration)
Administration Fee $350 $561 ($211)
ENGINEERING
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 18
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Curb Stenciling $11 $33 ($22)
Parcel Map/Tract Map Development Fees
Final Parcel Map Review $1,805 $3,376 ($1,571)
Final Tract Map Review
Application $1,954 $3,702 ($1,748)
Over 4 lots $13 $46 ($33)
Final Map Amendment Review $550 $3,114 ($2,564)
Street Name Processing w/o Map $2,011 $2,332 ($321)
Street Re-Name Processing $2,011 $2,332 ($321)
Street/Right-of-Way Abandonment Processing $1,774 $2,055 ($281) Building Address or Re-Address Processing without Map $555 $705 ($150) Drainage
Drainage Plan/Check/Inspections/ SWPP
Single-Family / ADU $350 $634 ($284)
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial
Actual
Cost $1,007 N/A
Geotechnical/Soils Report Review
Single-Family / ADU $550 $785 ($235)
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial
Actual
Cost $1,015 N/A
Low Impact Development (LID Report)
Single-Family / ADU $550 $785 ($235)
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial
Actual
Cost $1,015 N/A
Encroachment Permits
Temporary Placement on Street Permit $86 $336 ($250)
Temporary Encroachment Permit $86 $368 ($282)
Permanent Encroachment Permit $241 $782 ($541)
Plan Checks
Public Improvement Plan Check/ Inspection 5.00% 5.00% $0 Traffic Control Plan Review $350 $733 ($383)
Miscellaneous Plan Review
Single-Family / ADU $350 $785 ($435)
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial
Actual
Cost $1,292 N/A
Signing/Striping Plan Check $307 $870 ($563)
SWPPP Review Fee
Less than 1 acre $350 $497 ($147)
1 acre or more $550 $864 ($314)
Traffic Study Review Fee $550 $742 ($192)
Delta Revision Fee $307 $777 ($470)
Delta Revision to Drainage/Grading Plans $350 $432 ($82) Stock Pile Plan Review Fee $307 $733 ($426)
Hydrology & Hydraulics Report Review Fee
Single-Family / ADU $550 $872 ($322)
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 19
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Actual Cost
Drive Approach Permits
Residential Drive Approach $145 $520 ($375)
Commercial Drive Approach $300 $740 ($440)
Excavation Permits
Natural Soil Excavation (sod/earth) $145 $603 ($458)
Paved Surfaces:
1 – 50 square foot $145 $300 ($155)
51 – 300 square foot $300 $366 ($66)
301 – 600 square foot $450 $485 ($35)
601 – 1,000 square foot $691 $702 ($11)
Over 1,000 square foot $691 $870 ($179)
Each Addl. 100 sq. ft. over 1,000 $25 $29 ($4)
Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk & Paving Permits
Curb and/or Gutter
0 - 100 linear foot $145 $466 ($321)
Over 100 linear foot $1.00 $1.34 ($0.34)
Sidewalk
0 - 100 sq. ft. $145 $603 ($458)
Over 100 sq. ft. $1.00 $1.21 ($0.21)
Minor Curb Cut/Drilling (Core) $145 $538 ($393)
Sewer Fees
House Sewer Connecting to Public Sewer $145 $777 ($632) Sewer Front Footage $6.50 $6.59 ($0.09)
Sewer Acreage $730 $780 ($50)
Sewer Main Inspection Fee $1.00 $1.68 ($0.68)
Manhole, Junction Structure, etc. Inspection $71 $304 ($233) Sewer Area Study Review Fee
Single-Family / ADU $550 $923 ($373)
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Actual Cost
Miscellaneous Fees
Pool Drainage Permit $73 $236 ($163)
Sign Impound Fee $100 $199 ($99)
Easement Quitclaim Deed Processing $445 $923 ($478)
Oversized Transportation Permit $16 $215 ($199)
Moving Building/House
Permit Fee $75 $181 ($106)
Hazardous Material Spill: Cleanup & Disposal Sewage Spill Cleanup Damage to City Property/ Repair $273 ($273)
Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Management Plan Administration
Projects with a valuation less than $100,000:
City Approved Haul $0 $99 ($99)
Self-Haul $80 $99 ($19)
Projects with a valuation greater than $100,000:
City Approved Haul $80 $99 ($19)
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 20
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Self-Haul $160 $99 $61
Preferential Parking District - Establishment or Modification Actual Cost Miscellaneous Inspections
Inspections (after hours/weekends)
Actual
Cost $162 N/A
Re-inspections
Actual
Cost $136 N/A
Inspection (no indicated fee)
Actual
Cost $136 N/A
3rd Party Consultants
Actual
Cost $294 N/A
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (Public Right-of-Way) Administrative Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - Small Wireless Facilities - Deposit $1,650 $4,000 ($2,350) Administrative Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - Eligible Facilities Request - Flat fee for review $450 $543 ($93) Major Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - NonAdministrative - Deposit $1,650 $8,000 ($6,350) Grading & Drainage Plan Check/Inspection Fees Grading Permit Fees 51-1000 Cubic Yards
For First 50 Cubic Yards $677 $809 ($132)
Each add'l 100 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof $154 $171 ($17) 1,001-10,000 Cubic Yards
For First 1,001 Cubic Yards $2,252 $2,439 ($187)
Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof $192 $196 ($4) 10,001-50,000 Cubic Yards
For First 10,001 Cubic Yards $4,057 $4,206 ($149)
Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof $270 $81 $189 50,001-100,000 Cubic Yards
For First 50,001 Cubic Yards $7,238 $7,467 ($229)
Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof $115 $113 $2 Over 100,000 Cubic Yards
For First 100,000 Cubic Yards $12,998 $13,166 ($168)
Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof $58 $56 $2 The fees administered by the Engineering Division generally under-recover for its services. The largest non-deposit related deficit is in relation to ‘Final Map Amendment Review’ fee under the Parcel Map/Tract Map Development Fees category for $2,564. The smallest under recoveries are in relation to Sewer Fees, specifically for a ‘Sewer Front Footage’ fee for $0.09 per square foot.
There are also a handful of over-recoveries as it relates to the grading and drainage plan check and inspection fees. Right-sizing those fees will ensure that the City can achieve greater cost recovery.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 21
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Engineering has a deficit of roughly $199,000. The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 7: ANNUAL RESULTS – ENGINEERING
Fee Category
Revenue at
Current Fee
Annual Cost Difference
Encroachment Permits $11,508 $46,372 ($34,864)
Plan Checks $103,371 $109,104 ($5,733)
Drive Approach Permits $15,585 $53,540 ($37,955)
Excavation Permits $237,384 $344,408 ($107,024)
Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk & Paving Permits $668 $2,404 ($1,736) Miscellaneous Fees $1,876 $10,310 ($8,434)
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (Public Right-of-Way) $11,250 $13,575 ($2,325) Grading & Drainage $56,739 $57,751 ($1,012)
Total $438,381 $637,465 ($199,083)
Engineering has an annual cost recovery of roughly 69%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to the Excavation Permits, specifically $75,570 of the difference is due to the ‘Natural Soil Excavation (sod/earth)’. Currently, The City charges $145 per excavation, the total cost was calculated to be $603, resulting in a per unit deficit of $458. The large per unit deficit coupled with the roughly 165 times these permits were administered in the past year resulted in the large cost recovery gap. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 22
The Environmental Services Division is part of the Public Works Department. Environmental Services is responsible for handling the city’s recycling and solid waste programs, regulatory compliance, and community outreach around environmental education. This program is currently administered through a third party consultant that is managed by City staff. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts as appropriate for the fee-related services provided by the Environmental Services Division.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating ‘FOG Program Wastewater Sampling and Analysis’ as this service is not offered.
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees as they highlight services already offered but not codified on the fee schedule:
o ‘NPDES - Current Construction Re-inspection’
o ‘Environmental Services Hourly Fee’
The modifications noted ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services being provided by Environmental Services staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Environmental Services Division collects fees for Fats, Oils, and Grease inspections, and NPDES inspections. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct consultant costs, Departmental, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 8: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
FOG Fees
FOG (Fats, Oil and Grease) Application Fee for New Restaurants $250 $276 ($26) FOG Program Inspections $180 $193 ($13)
FOG Program, Industrial, Automotive, and Gas Station Re-inspection Fee $100 $193 ($93) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Services (NPDES) NPDES - Current Construction Inspection $145 $383 ($238) NPDES - Current Construction Re-inspection New $191 N/A NPDES Automotive Inspection
Inspection $240 $257 ($17)
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 23
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Follow-up $150 $177 ($27)
NPDES Gas Station Inspection
Inspection $230 $257 ($27)
Follow-up $150 $177 ($27)
NPDES Industrial Inspection
Inspection $270 $386 ($116)
Follow-up $140 $281 ($141)
NPDES Restaurant Inspection
Inspection $140 $193 ($53)
Follow-up $150 $156 ($6)
NPDES - Nursery
Inspection $240 $257 ($17)
Follow-up $150 $177 ($27)
NPDES Non-Industrial Inspection
Inspection $240 $257 ($17)
Follow-up $150 $177 ($27)
Other Fees
Environmental Services Hourly Fee New $184 N/A
The fees administered by the Environmental Services Division under-recover. The largest deficit is in relation to ‘NPDES - Current Construction Inspection’ under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Services (NPDES) at $238. The smallest under recovery is for the ‘NPDES Restaurant Inspection – Follow up’ under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Services (NPDES) category at $6.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Environmental Services has a deficit of roughly $33,000.
The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 9: ANNUAL RESULTS – ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference FOG Fees $22,500 $27,995 ($5,495)
NPDES $45,010 $72,330 ($27,320)
Total $67,510 $100,325 ($32,815)
Environmental Services has an annual cost recovery of roughly 67%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to (NPDES), specifically $23,000 of the difference is due to ‘Current Construction Inspection’.
Currently, the City charges $145 per inspection; the total cost was calculated to be $383, resulting in a per-unit deficit of $238. This large per-unit deficit, coupled with the roughly 96 times these inspections were administered in the past year, results in the large cost recovery gap. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 24
The Finance Division is part of the Administrative Services Department. The finance division provides minimal fee-related services for business licenses and utility billing support (captured under utilities).
The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual results for the fee-related services provided by the Finance Division.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with city staff, the only modification proposed to the fee schedule was the elimination of ‘Reprint of Business Licenses’ as this service is no longer offered. This update more accurately reflects the services being provided by Finance Staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Finance Division collects fees for Business License and Special Events. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Division and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 10: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – FINANCE
Fee Name
Current
Fee
Total
Cost Difference
Business License Fees
New Business License Application Review $77 $88 ($11)
Business License Renewal $10 $29 ($19)
Bingo Permit $50 $70 ($20)
Dance Permit $30 $35 ($5)
Solicitation and Peddling Permit
First Vendor $50 $77 ($27)
Each Additional Vendor $20 $44 ($24)
Vending Machines, Amusement Devices
Machine Fee $35 $52 ($17)
Special Events
Parade/Special Event / Outdoor Display Permit
New (PD Parade/Special Event) $580 $612 ($32)
Business Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) $100 $95 $5 Non-Profit Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) $50 $60 ($10) Repeat (PD Parade/Special Event) $216 $230 ($14)
Business Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) $100 $95 $5 Non-Profit Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) $50 $60 ($10)
FINANCE
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 25
Nearly all of the fees administered by the Finance Division are under-recovering for their associated costs. The largest under-recovery is for a ‘New (PD Parade / Special Event)’ at $32. The smallest undercharge is in the Business License Fees category for a ‘Dance Permit’ at $5. There are a handful of over-recoveries in relation to the business permit fees for special outdoor event display.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Finance has a deficit of roughly $74,000. The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 11: ANNUAL RESULTS – FINANCE
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Business License Fees $97,416 $170,478 ($73,062)
Special Events $12,632 $13,398 ($766)
Total $110,048 $183,876 ($73,828)
Finance has an annual cost recovery of roughly 60%. ‘Business License Renewal’ makes up roughly $64,000 of the $64,000. Currently, the City charges $10 per renewal, the total cost was calculated to be $29, resulting in a per unit deficit of $19. While the per unit deficit is not particularly large, this service was administered 3,366 times in the past year, resulting in the large deficit amount. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 26
The Library Department manages and administers the Library’s budget, collections, and strategic planning to provide modern, community-centered library services. The Library also offers public programs, materials, and technology resources for all ages. The majority of the Library’s services are free for the public to utilize. The scope of this analysis was rental fees, processing fees, and administering / proctoring test fees. The following sections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per-unit results, and annual results for the fee-related services provided by Library staff.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with Library staff, staff proposed modifying the following fees for Other Fees and Charges:
o ‘Books, videos, software, compact discs, audio tapes & playaways, laptops/tablets’ was changed to ‘All physical materials except magazines, pamphlets & passes’ o ‘Magazines, and pamphlets’ was changed to ‘Magazines, pamphlets and passes’ The modifications noted ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services being provided by Library staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
Of the Library fees evaluated in this analysis, the Library Department collects fees for event facility rentals, interlibrary loans, and administering/proctoring tests. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and department and citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 12: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – LIBRARY
Fee Name Current Fee
Total
Cost Difference
Library Meeting/Event Facilities Fees (Resident Non-Profit) Facility Deposit $0 $500 ($500)
Bidwell Forum $0 $140 ($140)
Bidwell Forum with Plaza $0 $172 ($172)
Friends Room $0 $83 ($83)
Cleaning Deposit $250 $250 $0
Person-on-duty $25 $59 ($34)
Microphone Fee $0 $24 ($24)
Video Equipment (VHS/DVD Players, TV Monitors,
Screens, Laptops, Projectors) $0 $33 ($33)
Library Meting/Event Facilities Fees (All Other Groups
Facility Deposit $250 $500 ($250)
LIBRARY
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 27
Fee Name Current Fee
Total
Cost Difference
Bidwell Forum $100 $140 ($40)
Bidwell Forum with Plaza $150 $172 ($22)
Friends Room $75 $83 ($8)
Cleaning Deposit $250 $250 $0
Person-on-duty $25 $59 ($34)
Microphone Fee $10 $24 ($14)
Video Equipment (VHS/DVD Players, TV Monitors,
Screens, Laptops, Projectors) $25 $33 ($8)
Other Fees and Charges
Processing:
All physical materials except magazines, pamphlets
& passes $10 $21 ($11)
Magazines, and pamphlets, and passes $2 $2 $0
Lost Library Card $2 $2 $0
Holds on material:
Per item Unclaimed $0 $2 ($2)
Interlibrary Loan Request $2 $30 ($28)
Administrating/proctoring tests $40 $43 ($3)
The Library Department under-recovers on all fees. The largest under-recovery that is not in relation to a deposit is at $172 for a ‘Bidwell Forum with Plaza’ usage under Library Meeting/Event Facilities Fees (Resident Non-Profit). This is because the City does not currently charge non-profit resident groups for the use of the facility, but there is still a cost incurred. The smallest under-recovery is in relation to the ‘Holds on Material – Per Item Unclaimed’ fee under the Other Fees and Charges category for $2.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, the Library has a deficit of roughly $34,000. The following table shows the revenue at the current fees, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 13: ANNUAL RESULTS – LIBRARY
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Library Meeting/Event Facilities Fees $350 $826 ($476)
Other Fees and Charges $32,340 $66,003 ($33,663)
Total $32,690 $66,829 ($34,139)
The Library has an annual cost recovery of roughly 49%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to the Other Fees and Charges; specifically $31,526 of the difference is due to the processing fees. Currently, the Library charges $10 per item processed; the total cost was calculated to be $21, resulting in a perunit deficit of $11.The per-unit deficit, coupled with the roughly 2,866 times it was charged, resulted in the large cost recovery gap. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 28
The Planning Division part of the Community Development. The Planning Division is responsible for ensuring that construction is in compliance with the city’s zoning and land usage regulations, plan checks, environmental reviews, grading, and zoning. The Planning Division also responsible for developing the city’s community development policies, general plans, zoning codes, regional planning activities, and land use studies. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detailed per unit results for the fee-related services provided by Planning.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating the following fees as these services are no longer offered by City staff or are now incorporated into the general use permit (CUP) process:
o ‘Radius Map and Labels’
o ‘Animal Conditional Use Permit’
• Moved Fees: To better align with where and how services are provided, the following fees have been reassigned to their respective departments.
o ‘Building Address Processing w/o Map’, ‘Building Investigation’, ‘Building Permit Surcharge for NPDES (SWPPP) Inspections’, ‘Building Plan Check/Inspection’, ‘Building Re-Address Processing’, ‘Building Re-inspection’, ‘Change of Occupancy’, ‘Fire Alarm Plan Check/Inspection’, ‘Fire Hood/Duct Plan Check/Inspection’, ‘Lost Inspection Card’, ‘Temporary Occupancy Review’ were moved from Planning to Building. o ‘FOG (Fire, Oil and Gas) Application Fee for New Restaurants’, ‘FOG Program Inspections’, ‘FOG Program Wastewater Sampling and Analysis’, ‘FOG Program, Industrial, Automotive, and Gas Station Re-inspection Fee’ were moved from Planning to Environmental Services. o Public Transit Service and Transportation were moved from Planning to Recreation and Human Services.
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees, to capture services already provided but not codified:
o ‘Administrative Subdivision (SB9, SB684, and AB1033)’ o Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
o ‘SB330 Applications’
o ‘Technical Review’
The modifications noted ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Planning staff.
PLANNING
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 29
DETAILED RESULTS
The Planning Division collects fees for appeals, development plans, street/sidewalk vendor permits, and wireless telecommunication facility fees. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 14: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – PLANNING
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Animal Conditional Use Permit Actual Cost
Annexation Actual Cost
Appeal to City Council
Initial Deposit $2,000 $3,064 ($1,064)
Subsequent Deposits $1,000 $1,532 ($532)
Appeal to Planning Commission
Initial Deposit $2,000 $3,064 ($1,064)
Subsequent Deposits $1,000 $1,532 ($532)
Certificate of Compliance $1,481 $1,079 $402
Conceptual Review $1,041 $5,167 ($4,126)
Conditional Use Permit $2,425 $8,705 ($6,280)
Development Agreement Actual Cost
Development Plan Review – Minor
Director $2,483 $4,415 ($1,932)
Commission $3,297 $5,028 ($1,731)
Development Plan Review – Major $5,000 $7,628 ($2,628)
Environmental Impact Report Review Actual Cost
Environmental Initial Study Actual Cost
Environmental: Categorical Exemption Review $214 $432 ($218) General Plan Amendment - Map $4,000 $8,705 ($4,705)
General Plan Amendment - Other $15,000 $8,705 $6,295
Business License Zoning Verification $29 $101 ($72)
Landscape Plans Applications $400 $355 $45
Legal Review of CC&Rs Actual Cost
Lot Line Adjustment $1,554 $717 $837
Lot Merger $1,554 $717 $837
Minor Modification $1,422 $3,802 ($2,380)
Mitigation Monitoring Actual Cost
Modification Review (CUP or Variance) $2,067 $3,802 ($1,735) Planned Development $10,000 $8,705 $1,295
Planned Redevelopment $10,000 $8,705 $1,295
Reversion to Acreage Actual Cost
Review of CC&Rs Actual Cost
Sign Variance $1,951 $1,198 $753
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 30
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Specific Plan Review Actual Cost
Renewals $165 $125 $40
Tentative Parcel Map Review (Lot Split) $4,006 $4,275 ($269) Administrative Subdivision (SB9, SB684, & AB1033) New $4,679 N/A Tentative Tract Map (Subdivision) $5,286 $5,487 ($201)
Time Extension Review $1,042 $738 $304
Variance $2,224 $3,802 ($1,578)
Zone Change - Map $4,000 $8,705 ($4,705)
Zone Change - Other $15,000 $8,705 $6,295
Zoning Verification Letter $214 $1,657 ($1,443)
Conditional Use Permit - Minor $1,315 $738 $577
Recreational Vehicle Admin Review Permit Appeal $200 $585 ($385) Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
Eligible Facility Requests (EFR) New $1,351 N/A
Minor Wireless Facility Permit New $6,253 N/A
Major Wireless Facility Permit New $8,705 N/A
SB330 Applications New $891 N/A
Technical Review (Applicable to Administrative
Subdivisions, Tentative Parcel Map / Tentative
Tract Map, Certificate of Compliance, Lot Line
Adjustment, and Lot Merger) New Actual Cost N/A
Nearly all of the fees administered by the Planning Division under-recover for their associated costs. The largest under-recovery is $6,280 for ‘Conditional Use Permit’ under the Planning fees. The smallest undercharge is in the Planning Fees category for the ‘Business License Zoning Verification’ fee at $72.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Planning has a deficit of roughly $151,000. The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 15: ANNUAL RESULTS – PLANNING
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Conceptual Review $11,451 $56,837 ($45,386)
Conditional Use Permit $21,577 $77,453 ($55,876)
Development Plan Review $65,352 $100,337 ($34,984)
Planned Development $32,797 $28,550 $4,247
SB9 Lot Split Applications $17,524 $18,716 ($1,192)
Tentative Tract Map (Subdivision) $34,036 $35,330 ($1,294) Variance $21,924 $37,480 ($15,556)
Zoning Verification Letter $1,070 $8,285 ($7,215)
Misc. Planning Applications $32,892 $26,303 $6,588
Total $238,622 $389,291 ($150,669)
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 31
Planning has an annual cost recovery of roughly 61%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to the ‘Conditional Use Permit’. Currently, the city charges $2,425 per permit but it costs them $8,705 to provide the service. The division should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 32
The Police Department is responsible for preserving public safety and maintaining the peace within the city through patrolling, investigating crimes, traffic enforcement, and 24/7 rapid responses to emergencies. As it relates to fee-related services, the police department is responsible for recordsrelated services and false alarms. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by the Police Department.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating the following fees, as these services are no longer offered by City staff, covered under other fees, or are now offered by other departments within the City:
o ‘Adult Business Entertainer Permit’
o ‘Adult Business License’
o ‘Disabled Placard Valid but Not Properly Displayed’
o ‘Police Computer Records Search’
o Street Vendor Permit
o Alarm System Appeal Fees and other Alarm system penalties • Moved Fees: Staff proposed moving the Parade/Special Event Permit category from Police to Finance in order to better align with where and how services are provided. • Contracted Fees: Animal control services are contracted with an external agency; therefore, these fees were not evaluated through this analysis.
The modifications noted ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services being provided by Police staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Police Department collects fees for bicycle licenses, code enforcement investigations, noise disturbances response call-backs / alcohol consumed by a minor, parking permits, police report copies, alarm fees, and CCW licenses. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name and total cost associated with each service offered.
POLICE
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 33
TABLE 16: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – POLICE
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Bicycle Licenses
New license $6 $8 ($2)
Renewal $3 $8 ($5)
Cost Recovery of Graffiti Damage Caused by a Minor Actual Cost Actual Cost N/A DUI Incident Response Investigation Actual Cost Actual Cost N/A Fingerprint Card $20 $24 ($4)
Impound Vehicle Release $120 $162 ($42)
Inspection, documentation and registration of vacant property or property in foreclosure $200 $83 $117
Massage Business Permit $350 $335 $15
Massage Business Permit Renewal $350 $167 $183
Massage Tech/Practitioner Permit $297 $167 $130
Massage Tech/Practitioner Permit Renewal $297 $83 $214
Massage Business Location Change $182 $167 $15
Massage Business Sale/Transfer $350 $167 $183
Parking Permit - Early Morning
Early Morning/Per Day $5 $5 $0
Early Morning/Per Year $75 $83 ($8)
Police Photo Reproduction $33 $37 ($4)
Police Report Copy
First Five (5) pages Free $0 N/A
Additional Pages After 5 $0.15 $0.15 $0.00
Police Special Services Actual Cost Actual Cost N/A
Records Check/Clearance Letter $25 $42 ($17)
Vehicle Equipment Correction Inspection $25 $29 ($4)
Video/Audio Disk Reproduction $25 $37 ($12)
Weapons Storage Processing $50 $61 ($11)
Traffic Collision Report $20 $21 ($1)
Sidewalk Vendor - Impounding Equipment & Merchandise $200 $209 ($9) Alarm Fees
Alarm Permit
Residential $40 $52 ($12)
Commercial $50 $52 ($2)
False Alarm Fines
Permitted
1st Alarm $0 $138 ($138)
2nd Alarm $75 $138 ($63)
3rd Alarm $150 $138 $12
4th Alarm $250 $138 $112
5th Alarm $250 $138 $112
Non-Permitted
1st Alarm $50 $138 ($88)
2nd Alarm $175 $138 $37
3rd Alarm $200 $138 $62
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 34
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
4th Alarm $350 $138 $212
5th Alarm $350 $138 $212
Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW)
Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - New Application $389 $1,454 ($1,065) Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - Amended Application $10 $435 ($425) Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - Live Scan $20 $24 ($4)
Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - Renewal $129 $871 ($742) The majority of the fees administered by the Police Department under-recover for their associated costs.
The largest under-recovery is $1,065 for ‘Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - New Application’ under Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW). The largest over-recovery is for $214 for ‘Massage Tech/Practitioner Permit Renewal’ Under Police Fees. The smallest undercharge is for a ‘Each Additional Card’ and ‘Traffic Collision Report’ fee at $1. The smallest over-recovery outside of penalties is for a ‘Massage Permit’ and a ‘Massage Business Location Change’ for $15.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Police has a deficit of roughly $233,000. The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 17: ANNUAL RESULTS – POLICE
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Police Fees $175,588 $233,852 ($58,264)
Alarm Fees $77,250 $153,640 ($76,390)
Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) $36,611 $134,755 ($98,144) Total $289,449 $522,247 ($232,798)
Police has an annual cost recovery of roughly 55%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to the ‘Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW)’, specifically $94,785 of the difference is due to the ‘Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - New Application’. Currently, the City Charges $389 per permit; the total cost was calculated to be $1,454, resulting in a per unit deficit of $1,065. This per-unit deficit, coupled with the roughly 89 times the fee was charged in the past year, resulted in the large cost recovery gap. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 35
The Recreation Division is part of the Recreation and Human Services Department. The Recreation Division is responsible for developing, managing, and coordinating recreational activities, educational programs, spring and summer camps, 21 city-wide special events, and the city’s various facilities/fields that can be utilized by residents. While Recreation and Human Services administers other fees, for the purposes of this analysis we only evaluated the field rental fees. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by the Recreation Division.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, no modifications were proposed to the to the fee schedule.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Recreation Division is responsible for collecting fees for field rentals. The Recreation Division assesses different fees based on the “group” that is receiving the service. The City currently has six group classifications. The following points identify each group:
• Group 1: Sanctioned Glendora Youth Leagues/Official GUSD Programs or events • Group 2: Educational and Nonprofit Groups
• Group 3: Resident Single Day Use
• Group 4: Resident Travel
• Group 5: Non-Resident Travel
• Group 6: Tournaments
The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Division and Citywide overhead.
The following table details the fee name and total cost associated with each service offered by the group category.
TABLE 18: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – RECREATION FIELDS Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Pompei Turf Fields1
Field Rental
Group 1 $0 $213 ($213)
Group 2 $30 $213 ($183)
Group 3 $50 $213 ($163)
Group 4 $100 $213 ($113)
Group 5 $150 $213 ($63)
1 Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/facilities
RECREATION
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 36
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Group 6 $200 $213 ($13)
Lights
Group 1 $12 $12 $0
Group 2 $15 $12 $3
Group 3 $15 $12 $3
Group 4 $20 $12 $8
Group 5 $25 $12 $13
Group 6 $30 $12 $18
Administration Fee
Group 1 $10 $32 ($22)
Group 2 $10 $32 ($22)
Group 3 $10 $32 ($22)
Group 4 $10 $32 ($22)
Group 5 $10 $32 ($22)
Group 6 $10 $32 ($22)
Facility Deposit
Group 1 $0 $673 ($673)
Group 2 $0 $673 ($673)
Group 3 $0 $673 ($673)
Group 4 $0 $673 ($673)
Group 5 $0 $673 ($673)
Group 6 $500 $673 ($173)
Finkbiner Park Fields2
Field Rental
Group 1 $0 $66 ($66)
Group 2 $15 $66 ($51)
Group 3 $20 $66 ($46)
Group 4 $40 $66 ($26)
Group 5 $80 $66 $14
Group 6 $100 $66 $34
Lights
Group 1 $12 $12 $0
Group 2 $15 $12 $3
Group 3 $15 $12 $3
Group 4 $20 $12 $8
Group 5 $25 $12 $13
Group 6 $30 $12 $18
Administration Fee
Group 1 $10 $38 ($28)
Group 2 $10 $38 ($28)
Group 3 $10 $38 ($28)
Group 4 $10 $38 ($28)
Group 5 $10 $38 ($28)
2 Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/facilities
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 37
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Group 6 $10 $38 ($28)
Facility Deposit
Group 1 $0 $236 ($236)
Group 2 $0 $236 ($236)
Group 3 $0 $236 ($236)
Group 4 $0 $236 ($236)
Group 5 $0 $236 ($236)
Group 6 $500 $236 $264
Glendora Unified Fields3
Field Rental
Group 1 $0 $199 ($199)
Group 2 $15 $199 ($184)
Group 3 $20 $199 ($179)
Group 4 $40 $199 ($159)
Group 5 $80 $199 ($119)
Group 6 $100 $199 ($99)
Lights
Group 1 $12 $12 $0
Group 2 $15 $12 $3
Group 3 $15 $12 $3
Group 4 $20 $12 $8
Group 5 $25 $12 $13
Group 6 $30 $12 $18
Administration Fee
Group 1 $10 $89 ($79)
Group 2 $10 $89 ($79)
Group 3 $10 $89 ($79)
Group 4 $10 $89 ($79)
Group 5 $10 $89 ($79)
Group 6 $10 $89 ($79)
Facility Deposit
Group 1 $0 $688 ($688)
Group 2 $0 $688 ($688)
Group 3 $0 $688 ($688)
Group 4 $0 $688 ($688)
Group 5 $0 $688 ($688)
Group 6 $500 $688 ($188)
The fees administered by the Recreation Division generally under-recover for its services. For fees outside of deposits, the largest under recovery is in relation to Pompei Turf Fields, specifically ‘Field Rentals – Group 1’ at $213. The smallest undercharge is for a ‘Field Rental – Group 6’ under Pompei Turf Fields at $13. There is a handful of over-recoveries associated with ‘Lights’ for Pompei Turf Fields, Finkbiner Park Fields, and Glendora Unified Fields. While the Parks and Recreation fees generally under 3 Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/facilities
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 38
recover, these fees are different in the sense that they’re based on what the market can bear and as such do not have to be set based on the cost of the service, but rather the market rate.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Recreation has a deficit of roughly $253,000 for field rentals. The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 19: ANNUAL RESULTS – RECREATION
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Pompei Turf Fields $58,820 $310,340 ($251,520)
Finkbiner Park Fields $500 $2,080 ($1,580)
Total $59,320 $312,420 ($253,100)
Recreation has an annual cost recovery of roughly 19%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to the Pompei Turf Fields, specifically due to ‘Field rentals – Group 2’. The city currently charges only $30, but the full cost is $213. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 39
The Water Department is part of Public Works. It is responsible for treating, maintaining, and distributing safe and clean water to all residents across the city. While the majority of its services are covered through rates, there are a handful of fees that are assessed by the Water Department in relation to service disconnects, reconnects, meter testing, installation, etc. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by the Water Department.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, staff proposed eliminating the following fees, as these services are no longer offered by City staff, covered under other fees, or are now offered by other departments within the City:
o ‘Quitclaims of Water Easement’
o ‘Convert Private Pipe to City’
o ‘Fire Hydrant Inspections (Private Hydrant Inspection)’ The modifications noted ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services being provided by Water staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Water Department is responsible for collecting fees for Service Reconnection Fees, clean-up of sewage and hazardous materials, water system inspections, installation charges, and various other fees like fire hydrant flow tests, fire hydrant inspections, and irrigation plan reviews. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Department and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name and total cost associated with each service offered.
TABLE 20: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – UTILITY FEES
Fee Name
Current
Fee Total Cost Difference
Damage to City Property Repair Actual Cost
Service Reconnect Fees
Delinquent (Business hours, Customer receiving social
assistance):
$50 $107 ($57)
Delinquent (Outside of business hours, Customer receiving social assistance):
$150 $297 ($147)
Delinquent (Business Hours): $70 $107 ($37)
Delinquent (Outside of Business Hours): $150 $297 ($147) Non-Delinquent (Business Hours): $77 $107 ($30)
Non-Delinquent (Outside of Business Hours): $112 $297 ($185) Non-Delinquent (After midnight): $128 $297 ($169)
WATER
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 40
Fee Name
Current
Fee Total Cost Difference
Hazardous Material Spill Cleanup and Disposal Actual Cost Sewage Spill Cleanup Actual Cost
Temporary Water Meter Rental Service $29 $78 ($49)
Water System Inspection
Lateral for ADU $935 $491 $444
Manual Meter Read Fee $60 $234 ($174)
ACH Return Fee (incorrect bank information) $27 $57 ($30) Chargeback Fee (Customer Disputed Bill Penalty) $35 $57 ($22) New Account Application/Activation Fee (Processing Fee, excluding meter installation)
$77 $86 ($9)
Deposits for Service $200 $200 $0
Door Hanger Fee $20 $48 ($28)
Trip Charge for Additional Visit $76 $146 ($70)
Temporary Construction Meter $281 $292 ($11)
Water Service Installation Charges
Water Service Installation
3/4-1" Modified $5,000 N/A
2" Modified $7,000 N/A
4" Modified $10,000 N/A
6" Modified $12,000 N/A
Miscellaneous Water Fees and Charges
Backflow Preventer Installation $152 $152 $0
Fire Hydrant Flow Test (office study performed with hydraulic model) $551 $882 ($331)
Fire Hydrant Flow Test (Field Test) $512 $663 ($151)
Fire Flow Availability Form $299 $409 ($110)
Fire Hydrant Meter Deposit $1,851 $2,000 ($149)
Irrigation Plan Review/Water System Inspection (Non-Tract) $235 $132 $103 Fire Service Plan Review/Water Service Installation Plan Review $310 $132 $178 Water Meter Test
¾” – 2”: $308 $234 $74
Water Quality Testing Actual Cost
Bacterial Sample Test $517 $401 $116
Pressure Test $296 $401 ($105)
Hydrant Lock Fee (new lock with installation) $212 $287 ($75) Hydrant- Handle replacement fee $79 $167 ($88)
Broken lock/ damage costs & service. $212 $217 ($5)
Most of the fees administered by the Water Department under-recover for their associated costs. The largest under-recovery is $331 for ‘Fire Hydrant Flow Test (office study performed with hydraulic model)’ under Miscellaneous Water Fees and Charges. The largest over-recovery is $444 for ‘Water System Inspection - Lateral for ADU’. The smallest undercharge is for a ‘Broken lock/ damage costs & service’ fee under Miscellaneous Water Fees and Charges at $5. The smallest overcharge is for a ‘Water Meter Test – ¾” – 2”’ fee under Miscellaneous Water Fees and Charges at $74.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 41
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s workload information, Water has a deficit of roughly $160,000. The following table shows the revenue at the current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 21: ANNUAL RESULTS – UTILITY FEES
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Service Reconnect Fees $31,920 $115,824 ($83,904)
New Account $36,960 $41,280 ($4,320)
Door Hanger Fee $51,160 $122,784 ($71,624)
Total $120,040 $212,856 ($92,816)
Water has an annual cost recovery of roughly 56%. The largest under-recovery is in relation to the ‘Door Hanger Fee’. The per unit difference is approximately $28, and the City charged this fee approximately 2,558 times. The department should review these results and adjust fees appropriately to align with divisional and departmental cost recovery goals.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 42
There are two typical surcharges assessed as part of the development review process – General Plan Maintenance Fee and Technology fee. Currently, the City of Glendora assesses both of these fees. The following subsections discuss the calculation and application of the General Plan Maintenance Fee and Technology Fee and provides comparative context to other jurisdictions.
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE
A General Plan Maintenance fee is meant to account for updates to the general plan, zoning ordinance, housing elements, and other long-range planning activities that are part of the larger General Plan.
The General Plan Maintenance fee is governed by Government Code Section 66014(b) which states that fees “may include the costs reasonably necessary to prepare and revise the plans and policies that a local agency is required to adopt before it can make any necessary findings and recommendations.” This code states that fees can be charged against zoning changes, zoning variances, use permits, building inspections, and filing applications.
More typically, the fee is charged during the building permit phase to ensure any development project, which gets to that phase, makes enough of an impact to require the need for an update to the Zoning Code or the General Plan. This fee should only be applied to major building permits (i.e., new or remodel / tenant improvements) rather than standalone permits for water heaters or electrical outlets.
The project team took the estimated cost associated with updating the General Plan as budgeted in the City’s General Plan budget and divided it by the years over which those contracted services would be provided, to calculate the annualized cost. The following table breaks out by category the components that comprise the total annual cost calculation.
TABLE 22: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE – ANNUAL COSTS
Task Budget Annualized Per Year Cost
General Plan Contract $500,000 3 $166,667
Total Annual Cost $500,000 $166,667
The annual cost to the City for updating their general plan is roughly $166,667. The City currently charges the fee as a percentage of its building permit fees, which is the most common methodology. The project team calculated the full cost of the General Plan Fee based upon the Percentage of Building Permit Fee methodologies. The following table shows this calculation:
TABLE 23: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE CALCULATION
Category Calculation
Annual Cost $166,667
Total Building Permit Costs $1,312,038
General Plan Maintenance Fee 12.7%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SURCHARGES
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 43
As the table indicates, the calculated Comprehensive Plan Maintenance Fee is 12.7% of the building valuation. The following table compares the city’s current fee to the full cost fee calculated through this study:
TABLE 24: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE PER UNIT RESULTS Category Current Fee Full Cost Difference
General Plan Maintenance Fee 12% 12.7% (0.70%)
The City’s current fee is 12% of the fee paid for a building permit, while the full cost was calculated to be
12.7% of the fee paid for a building permit. This results in a per unit difference of 0.70%.
As part of this analysis, the project team conducted a comparative survey of other local jurisdictions and their assessment of a General Plan Maintenance Fee. Like other comparative efforts, the survey below simply shows the fees charged by the jurisdiction and does not include the basis upon which the other jurisdictions calculated or developed their fee. The following table shows the results of this comparative analysis:
TABLE 25: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE – COMPARATIVE SURVEY Jurisdiction Fee Amount
Arcadia 5% of Planning Applications
Azusa 10% of Permit
Brea $0.00196 x valuation
Covina $2.00 per $1,000 of Valuation
La Verne 4% of the Building Permit
Monrovia 15% of bldg & plan check fees
Upland 6% of the Permit Fee
As the table indicates the current fee charged by jurisdictions varies based upon project type and / or building permit. The full cost and current fee are generally higher than all of the other jurisdictions surveyed with the exception of Monrovia. However, like other comparative analyses, this only reflects the fee being charged, not necessarily the full cost of those services.
TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE FEE
A Technology Fee allows a jurisdiction to support the costs associated with its permitting system, staff time for managing the systems, acquiring the system, mobile devices used for permitting, etc. The City of Glendora currently charges a plan maintenance fee to capture the costs for technology and develops a budget annually for those technology-related needs. The project team utilized the annual contract budget of $500,000 for Plan Maintenance to calculate the updated technology fee.
The most defensible methodology for assessing a technology fee is based proportionately on the percentage of the permit fee, as the greater the permit fee, the more software utilization and storage space is required. This is how the City currently assesses its fee. Therefore, the project team took the total Technology Annual Cost and divided it by the annual fee-related cost associated with Building, Planning, and Engineering. The following table shows this calculation:
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 44
TABLE 26: TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE CALCULATION
Category Technology Fee Calculation
Total Annual Technology Cost $500,000
Total Annual Permitting Costs $2,709,617
Technology Surcharge 18.5%
Based upon this calculation, the City’s full cost Technology fee would be 18.5% of the permit fee.
Therefore, if a permit fee was $100, the Technology fee collected would be $18.50; whereas if a permit fee was $1,000; the Technology fee collected would be $185. This type of structure enables the Technology fee to be more proportionately distributed based upon the projects and their impact upon the system. The following table compares the City’s current fee to the full cost fee:
TABLE 27: TECHNOLOGY SURCHARRGE PER UNIT RESULTS
Category Current Fee Full Cost Difference
Technology Surcharge 13% 18.5% (5.5%)
The City’s current fee is 13% of the permit fee, while the full cost was calculated to be 18.5% of the permit fee. This results in a per unit difference of 5.5%.
As part of this analysis, the project team conducted a comparative survey of other local jurisdictions and their assessment of a Technology Fee. Like other comparative efforts, the survey below simply shows the fees charged by the jurisdiction. The following table shows the results of this comparative analysis:
TABLE 28: TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE – COMPARATIVE SURVEY
Jurisdiction Fee Amount
Arcadia 5.5% of Permit & Plan Check Fees
Azusa 5% of permit and plan check fee
Brea $0.0008 x valuation
Covina N/A
La Verne 2% on all Building Permits
Monrovia $8 per Permit
Upland N/A
As the table indicates the current fee charged by jurisdictions varies based upon project type and / or valuation. The current and full cost calculated for the City is higher than all the other jurisdictions surveyed. However, like other comparative analyses, this only reflects the fee being charged, not necessarily the full cost of those services.
SURCHARGE FUND BEST PRACTICES
It is a best practice to collect and account for General Plan Maintenance and Technology surcharges in separate accounts, as doing so ensures compliance with funding requirements, enables appropriate allocation of funds to general plan or technology-related activities, and mitigates any potential issues with the comingling of funds. The City already follows this best practice and should continue to do so.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 45
The following sections provide guidance regarding how and where to increase fees, determine annual update factors, and develop cost recovery policies and procedures.
FEE ADJUSTMENTS
This study has documented and outlined on a fee-by-fee basis where the City is under- and overcollecting for its fee-related services. City and Department management will now need to review the study results and adjust fees per Departmental and City philosophies and policies. The following points outline the major options the City has in adjusting its fees:
• Over-Collection: Upon review of the fees that were shown to be over-collecting for costs of services provided, the City should reduce the current fee to be in line with the full cost of providing the service.
• Full Cost Recovery: For fees that show an under-collection for costs of services provided, the City may decide to increase the fee to full cost recovery immediately. • Phased Increase: For fees with significantly low-cost recovery levels, or which would have a significant impact on the community, the City could choose to increase fees gradually over a set period.
The City will need to review the results of the fee study and associated cost recovery levels and determine how best to adjust fees. While decisions regarding fees that currently show an over-recovery are straightforward, the following subsections provide further detail on why and how the City should consider either implementing Full Cost Recovery or a Phased Increase approach to adjusting its fees.
FULL COST RECOVERY
Based on the permit or review type, the City may wish to increase the fee to cover the full cost of providing services. Certain permits may be close to cost recovery already, and an increase to full cost may not be significant. Other permits may have a more significant increase associated with full cost recovery.
Increasing fees associated with permits and services that are already close to full cost recovery can potentially bring a Department’s overall cost recovery level higher. Often, these minimal increases can provide necessary revenue to counterbalance fees that cannot be increased.
The City should consider increasing fees for permits for which services are rarely engaged to full cost recovery. These services often require specific expertise and can involve more complex research and review due to their infrequent nature. As such, setting these fees at full cost recovery will ensure that when the permit or review is requested, the City is recovering the full cost of its services.
COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 46
PHASED INCREASES
Depending on current cost recovery levels, some current fees may need to be increased significantly to comply with established or proposed cost recovery policies. Due to the type of permit or review or the amount by which a fee needs to be increased, it may be best for the City to use a phased approach to reaching its cost recovery goals.
As an example, you may have a current fee of $200 with a full cost of $1,000, representing 20% cost recovery. If the current policy is 80% cost recovery, the current fee would need to increase by $600, bringing the fee to $800, to comply with proposed recovery levels. Assuming this service is something the City provides quite often and affects various members of the community, an instant increase of $600 may not be feasible. Therefore, the City could take a phased approach, whereby it increases the fee annually over a set period until cost recovery is achieved.
Raising fees over a set period not only allows the City to monitor and control the impact to applicants but also ensure that applicants have time to adjust to significant increases. Continuing with the example above, the City could increase the fee by $150 per year for the next four years, spreading out the increase. Depending on the desired overall increase and the impact to applicants, the City could choose to vary the number of years by which it chooses to increase fees. However, the project team recommends that the City not phase increases for periods greater than five years, as that is the maximum window after which a comprehensive fee assessment should be completed.
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS
Conducting a comprehensive analysis of fee-related services and costs annually would be quite cumbersome and costly. The general recommendation is that a comprehensive fee analysis should be conducted every three to five years. This allows jurisdictions to ensure they account for organizational changes, such as staffing levels and merit increases, and process efficiencies, code or rule changes, or technology improvements. Developing annual update mechanisms allow jurisdictions to maintain current levels of cost recovery, while accounting for increases in staffing or expenditures related to permit services. The two most common types of update mechanisms are Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) factors. The following points provide further detail on each of these mechanisms:
• COLA / Personnel Cost Factor: Jurisdictions often provide their staff with annual salary adjustments to account for increases in local cost of living. These increases are not tied to merit or seniority but rather meant to offset rising costs associated with housing, gas, and other livability factors. Sometimes these factors vary depending on the bargaining group of a specific employee. Generally, these factors are around two or three percent annually. • CPI / ECI Factor: A common method of increasing fees or cost is to look at regional cost indicators, such as the Consumer Price Index or Employment Cost Index. These factors are calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, are put out at various intervals within a year, and are specific to states and regions.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 47
The City of Glendora already utilizes a CPI factor and it should continue to do so to ensure that fees are increased in alignment with cost increases.
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
This study has identified areas where the City is under-collecting the costs associated with providing services. This known funding gap is therefore being subsidized by other City revenue sources.
Development of cost recovery policies and procedures will ensure that current and future decision makers understand how and why fees were determined and set, as well as provide a road map for ensuring consistency when moving forward. The following subsections outline typical cost recovery levels and discuss the benefits of developing target cost recovery goals and procedures for achieving and increasing cost recovery.
TYPICAL COST RECOVERY
The Matrix Consulting Group has extensive experience in analyzing local government operations across the United States and has calculated typical cost recovery ranges. The following table outlines cost recovery ranges by major service area.
TABLE 29: TYPICAL COST RECOVERY RANGES BY MAJOR SERVICE AREA Service Areas Typical Cost Recovery Ranges
Building 80-100%
Engineering 80-100%
Environmental Services 60-80%
Finance 20-40%
Library 20-50%
Planning 50-80%
Police 20-50%
Recreation & Human Services 20-50%
Water 40-70%
The following graph depicts how Glendora compares to industry cost recovery range standards.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 48
Building, Environmental Services, Library, Planning, and Water are within the typical cost recovery range, while Finance and Police are above the typical cost recovery ranges. Engineering and Recreation & Human Services are below the typical recovery ranges.
DEVELOPMENT OF COST RECOVERY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The City should review the current cost recovery levels and adopt a formal policy regarding cost recovery.
This policy can be general in nature and can apply broadly to the City as a whole or to each department and division specifically. A department-specific cost recovery policy would allow the City to better control the cost recovery associated with different types of services being provided and the community benefit received.
82% 69% 67%
60%
49% 61%
55%
19%
56%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
Building Engineering Environmental
Services
Finance Library Planning Police Recreation Water
Cost Recovery %
Current Revenue Cost Recovery vs. Typical Revenue Cost Recovery Typical Cost Recovery Current Cost Recovery
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 49
As part of the Cost of Services (User Fee) study for the City of Glendora, Matrix Consulting Group conducted a comparative survey of user fees. The City identified seven municipalities to be included in the comparative survey: Arcadia, Azusa, Brea, Covina, La Verne, Monrovia, and Upland. The project team then reviewed public documents (i.e., agenda items, staff reports, budgets, fee schedules, and ordinances) and or contacted jurisdictions to get comparative information.
While this full report provides the City with a reasonable estimate and understanding of the true costs of providing services, many jurisdictions also wish to benchmark themselves against other comparable jurisdictions to understand the local “rates” for comparable services. This type of comparative analysis allows for the City to assess what types of changes in fee levels their community can bear. However, benchmarking does not provide adequate information regarding the relationship of other jurisdictions’ costs to their fees (i.e., policy decisions to subsidize, cost recovery goals, etc.). To contextualize this portion of the analysis, the project team provided economic and recency factors for the comparable jurisdictions.
The following sections detail various factors to consider when reviewing comparative survey results, as well as graphical comparisons of current fees and total calculated costs for various permits issued or services provided by the City.
ECONOMIC FACTORS
To provide additional context to the comparative survey information, the project team collected economic factors for the jurisdictions included. Three important economic factors to consider when comparing fees across multiple jurisdictions are: population, budget, and workforce size. These factors can impact how and when fees are administered, as a jurisdiction with a smaller population may choose to not charge a fee, or a smaller workforce size may inhibit their ability to administer a fee.
The following tables rank each jurisdiction from smallest to largest for each of these economic factors:
TABLE 30: RANKING OF JURISDICTIONS BY POPULATION
Jurisdiction Population4
La Verne 32,300
Monrovia 38,920
Brea 47,900
Azusa 48,988
Covina 51,090
Glendora 51,254
Arcadia 56,116
Upland 79,140
4 California Finance estimates as of 1/1/2024 were used to determine each jurisdiction’s population.
APPENDIX – COMPARATIVE SURVEY
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 50
TABLE 31: RANKING OF JURISDICTIONS BY CITYWIDE TOTAL BUDGET Jurisdiction FY25-26 Budget5
La Verne $78,164,008
Arcadia $88,313,900
Monrovia $96,099,951
Glendora $110,778,077
Brea $134,193,644
Upland $167,058,490
Covina $181,475,751
Azusa $183,300,000
TABLE 32: RANKING OF JURISDICTIONS BY FTE
Jurisdiction FY25-26 Authorized FTE
La Verne 195
Covina 232
Monrovia 243.75
Upland 268
Glendora 270.01
Arcadia 312.31
Azusa 378.01
Brea 406.014
When compared to the surveyed jurisdictions, the City of Glendora ranks near the top in terms of population, but on the middle for budget and staffing.
RECENCY FACTOR
While the above comparative information can provide some perspective when paralleling Glendora’s fees with surveyed jurisdictions, other key factors to consider are when a jurisdiction’s fee schedule was last updated and when the last comprehensive analysis was undertaken. It is important to note that even though jurisdictions may have conducted recent fee studies, their fees are not always adopted at full cost recovery. The comparative results only show the adopted fee for the surveyed jurisdiction, not necessarily the full cost associated with the comparable service.
The following tables detail when each surveyed jurisdiction last conducted a fee analysis and when they last updated their fee schedule:
TABLE 33: LAST FEE SCHEDULE UPDATE
Jurisdiction Response
Arcadia 2025
Azusa 2025
Brea 2025
Covina 2025
5 To ensure appropriate comparisons, full operating budget (all funds) has been used for all jurisdictions.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 51
Jurisdiction Response
La Verne 2025
Monrovia 2024
Upland 2025
TABLE 34: LAST FEE STUDY CONDUCTED
Jurisdiction Response
Arcadia 2021
Azusa 2016
Brea 2017
Covina 2016
La Verne N/A
Monrovia 2024
Upland 2023
Most of the surveyed jurisdictions have published an updated fee schedule within the last year. However, Monrovia last updated their fee schedule in 2024. Additionally, only half of the jurisdictions except for Azusa, Brea, and La Verne have conducted a fee study within the last five years.
ADDITIONAL FACTORS
Along with keeping the statistics outlined in the previous sections in mind, the following issues should also be noted regarding the use of market surveys in the setting of fees for service:
• Cost Recovery Factors: Each jurisdiction and its fees are different, and many are not based on the actual cost of providing services as various policy decisions may subsidize services. • Fee Variance Factors: A fee with the same name may encompass different types of services or activities across jurisdictions. Variability may stem from differences in service delivery models (e.g., in-house vs. contracted), the scope of work included under the fee, and staffing configurations, all of which can influence how indirect and overhead costs are allocated.
In addition to the issues noted, market surveys can also run the risk of creating a confusing excess of data that will obscure rather than clarify policy issues. Because each jurisdiction is different, the Matrix Consulting Group recommends that the information contained in the market comparison of fees be used as a secondary decision-making tool, rather than the primary method for determining an acceptable price point for services.
COMPARATIVE SURVEY RESULTS
As part of this study, the project team conducted a survey of how the City’s current user fees and calculated full cost compare to other identified jurisdictions. The following subsections provide a comparative look at several fee-related services provided by the City versus the surveyed jurisdictions.
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 52
TEMPORARY POWER POLE
Building currently charges a fee of $70 for Temporary Power Pole. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $177. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the second lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $70. However, its full cost of $177 is above the jurisdictional average of $167. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $103, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $169.
PLUMBING - WATER HEATER
Building currently charges a fee of $53 for Plumbing - Water Heater. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $85. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Temporary Power Pole
Fee Average
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Plumbing - Water Heater
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 53
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $53. However, its full cost of $85 is below the jurisdictional average of $121. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $64, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $83.
MECHANICAL - RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN HOOD & EXHAUST SYSTEM
Building currently charges a fee of $46 for Mechanical - Residential Kitchen Hood & Exhaust System.
Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $55. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $46. However, its full cost of $55 is below the jurisdictional average of $176. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $81.
RESIDENTIAL SOLAR
Building currently charges a fee of $500 for Residential Solar. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $559. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Mechanical - Residential Kitchen Hood &
Exhaust System
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 54
Glendora’s current fee is the highest when compared to other jurisdictions at $500. However, its full cost of $559 is above the jurisdictional average of $356. The City’s current fee and full cost are most comparable to Upland’s fee of $450.
SFR NEW PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION: 2,854 SQ. FT., VALUED AT $472,546 Building currently charges a fee of $5,082 for plan check and inspection of a new single family home that is 2,854 sq. ft., valued at $472,546. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $5,276. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the second lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $5,082. However, its full cost of $5,276 is below the jurisdictional average of $8,111. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to Brea’s fee of $5,500.
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Residential Solar - Base
Fee Average
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
SFR New Plan Check & Inspection: 2,854 sq.
ft., valued at $472,546
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 55
SFR REMODEL / ADDITION PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION: 1,759 SQ. FT., VALUED AT $117,811 Building currently charges a fee of $1,804 for plan check and inspection of a Remodel / Addition that is 1,759 sq. ft., valued at $117,811. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $2,398. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $1,804. However, its full cost of $2,398 is below the jurisdictional average of $3,272. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $2,039, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Covina’s fee of $2,250.
COMMERCIAL NEW PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION 5,988 SQ. FT, VALUED AT $811,760 Building currently charges a fee of $27,788 for Plan Check & Inspection of a new commercial building that is 5,988 sq. ft, valued at $811,760. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $27,392. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
Glendora
Current Fee
Arcadia Brea La Verne Upland
SFR Remodel / Addition Plan Check &
Inspection: 1,759 sq. ft., valued at
$117,811
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 56
Glendora’s current and full cost fees are the highest when compared to other jurisdictions. The City’s current and full cost fee is most comparable to Monrovia’s fee of $20,327.
COMM. TI PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION: 2,329 SQ. FT., VALUED AT $550,000 Building currently charges a fee of $5,728 for Plan Check & Inspection of a tenant improvement of a commercial project that is 2,329 sq. ft., valued at $550,000. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $5,874. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $5,728. However, its full cost of $5,874 is below the jurisdictional average of $9,519. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to Brea’s fee of $4,500.
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
Glendora
Current Fee
Arcadia Brea La Verne Upland
Commercial New Plan Check &
Inspection 5,988 sq. ft, valued at
$811,760
Fee Average
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
Glendora
Current Fee
Arcadia Brea La Verne Upland
Comm. TI Plan Check & Inspection:
2,329 sq. ft., valued at $550,000
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 57
TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
Engineering currently charges a fee of $86 for a Temporary Encroachment Permit. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $368. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compare to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $86. However, its full cost of $368 is above the jurisdictional average of $267. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $110, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Monrovia’s fee of $324.
RESIDENTIAL DRIVE APPROACH
Engineering currently charges a fee of $145 for the Residential Drive Approach. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $520. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia
Temporary Encroachment Permit
Fee Average
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Residential Drive Approach
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 58
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $145. However, its full cost of $520 is above the jurisdictional average of $372. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Upland’s fee of $290, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Monrovia’s and Azusa’s fee of $495.
SIDEWALK: 50 SQ. FT
Engineering currently charges a fee of $145 for Sidewalk: 50 sq. ft. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $603. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the third lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $145. However, its full cost of $603 is above the jurisdictional average of $325. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Brea’s fee of $110, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $594.
MANHOLE, JUNCTION STRUCTURE, ETC. INSPECTION
Engineering currently charges a fee of $71 for Manhole, Junction Structure, etc. Inspection. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $304. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Sidewalk: 50 sq. ft
Fee Average
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Manhole, Junction Structure, etc.
Inspection
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 59
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $71. However, its full cost of $304 is barely below the jurisdictional average of $318. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $220, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $310.
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION: 5,000 CUBIC YARDS Engineering currently charges a fee of $2,252 for Grading & Drainage Plan Check & Inspection: 5,000 cubic yards. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $2,439. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the third lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $2,252. However, its full cost of $2,439 is below the jurisdictional average of $3,855. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $1,390, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $3,139.
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW - NEW
Finance currently charges a fee of $77 for Business License Application Review - New. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $88. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Grading & Drainage Plan Check &
Inspection: 5,000 cubic yards
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 60
Glendora’s current fee is the second highest when compared to other jurisdictions at $77. However, its full cost of $88 is above the jurisdictional average of $54.
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW - RENEWAL
Finance currently charges a fee of $10 for Business License Application Review - Renewal. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $29. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $10. However, its full cost of $29 is above the jurisdictional average of $23. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $10, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Covina’s fee of $30. $0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Business License Application Review -
New
Fee Average
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Business License Application Review -
Renewal
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 61
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - NEW
Finance currently charges a fee of $580 for Special Event Permit - New. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $611. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the highest when compared to other jurisdictions at $580. However, its full cost of $612 is above the jurisdictional average of $221. The City’s current fee and full cost are most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $400.
LOST LIBRARY CARD
Library currently charges a fee of $2 for Lost Library Card. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $2. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Special Event Permit - New
Fee Average
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina Monrovia Upland
Lost Library Card
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 62
Glendora’s current and full cost fee are aligned with fees charged by Covina, Monrovia, and Upland. The cities of Arcadia and Azusa both charge $3.
INTERLIBRARY LOAN REQUEST
Library currently charges a fee of $2 for Interlibrary Loan Request. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $30. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $2. However, its full cost of $30 is above the jurisdictional average of $5. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Covina’s fee $4 fee.
PROCESSING FEE FOR LOST / DAMAGED MATERIALS
Library currently charges a fee of $10 for Processing Fee for Lost / Damaged Materials. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $21. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora Total
Cost
Arcadia Covina Monrovia
Interlibrary Loan Request
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 63
Glendora’s current fee is in the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $10. However, its full cost of $21 is above the jurisdictional average of $7. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Arcadia’s and Upland’s fee of $5 as well as Azusa’s fee of $15, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $15.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Planning currently charges a fee of $2,425 for Conditional Use Permit. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $8,705. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the third lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $2,425. However, its full cost of $8,705 is above the jurisdictional average of $4,315. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Brea’s Deposit and La Verne’s deposit of $2,000, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $7,332. Since other jurisdictions charge it as a deposit it is difficult to accurately compare the cost and the fee that would be ultimately assessed. $0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina Upland
Processing Fee
Fee Average
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Conditional Use Permit
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 64
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Planning currently charges a fee of $1,554 for Lot Line Adjustment. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $717. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is in the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $1,554. However, its full cost of $717 is below the jurisdictional average of $1,741. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Monrovia’s fee of $1,174, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Covina’s fee of $773.
MINOR MODIFICATION
Planning currently charges a fee of $1,422 for Minor Modification. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $3,802. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Lot Line Adjustment
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 65
Glendora’s current fee is the second highest when compared to other jurisdictions at $1,422. However, its full cost of $3,802 is above the jurisdictional average of $1,078. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Covina’s fee of $1,236, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Brea’s deposit of $2,000.
VARIANCE
Planning currently charges a fee of $2,224 for Variance. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $3,802. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the third lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $2,224. However, its full cost of $3,802 is above the jurisdictional average of $2,828. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Brea’s deposit of $2,000, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $2,816. $0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina Monrovia Upland
Minor Modification
Fee Average
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
Glendora
Current Fee
Arcadia Brea La Verne Upland
Variance
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 66
BUSINESS LICENSE ZONING VERIFICATION
Planning currently charges a fee of $29 for Business License Zoning Verification. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $101. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $29. However, its full cost of $101 is below the jurisdictional average of $238. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $125.
IMPOUND VEHICLE RELEASE
Police currently charges a fee of $120 for Impound Vehicle Release. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $162. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Business License Zoning Verification
Fee Average
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Impound Vehicle Release
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 67
Glendora’s current fee is the second lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $120. However, its full cost of $162 is below the jurisdictional average of $171. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $150, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Brea’s fee of $162.
RECORDS CHECK/CLEARANCE LETTER
Police currently charges a fee of $25 for Records Check/Clearance Letter. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $42. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $25. However, its full cost of $42 is above the jurisdictional average of $28. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Azusa’s, Brea’s, and Covina’s fee of $25, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Monrovia’s fee of $45.
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT
Police currently charges a fee of $20 for Traffic Collision Report. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $21. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Records Check/Clearance Letter
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 68
Glendora’s current fee is the among the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $20. However, its full cost of $21 is below the jurisdictional average of $28. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s, Covina’s, and Upland’s fee of $20.
CARRY CONCEALED WEAPON (CCW) - NEW APPLICATION
Police currently charges a fee of $389 for Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - New Application. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $1,454. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is among the highest when compared to other jurisdictions at $389. However, its full cost of $1,454 is above the jurisdictional average of $230. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $389.
29 GRASS TURF FIELD RENTAL: 2 HRS, NO LIGHTS - RESIDENT Recreation currently charges a fee of $40 for Grass Turf Field Rental: 2 hrs., no lights - resident. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $132. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Traffic Collision Report
Fee Average
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina La Verne Upland
Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) - New
Application
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 69
Glendora’s current fee is among the lowest when compared to other jurisdictions at $40. However, its full cost of $132 is above the jurisdictional average of $95. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $40, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $140.
GRASS TURF FIELD RENTAL: 1 HR, WITH 1 HR LIGHTS - NON-RESIDENT Recreation currently charges a fee of $105 for Grass Turf Field Rental: 1 hr., with 1 hr. lights - nonresident. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $78. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is in the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $105. However, its full cost of $78 is below the jurisdictional average of $180. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $105, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Monrovia’s fee of $59. $0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Grass Turf Field Rental: 2 hrs, no lights
- resident
Fee Average
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
Glendora
Current
Fee
Glendora
Total
Cost
Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Grass Turf Field Rental: 1 hr, with 1 hr
lights - non-resident
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 70
MANUAL METER READ FEE
Water currently charges a fee of $60 for Manual Meter Read Fee. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $234. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is in the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $60. However, its full cost of $234 is above the jurisdictional average of $102. The City’s current fee is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $50, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Arcadia’s fee of $219.
DELINQUENT RECONNECT
Water currently charges a fee of $70 for Delinquent Reconnect. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $107. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is in the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $70. However, its full cost of $107 is above the jurisdictional average of $79. The City’s current fee is most comparable to Brea’s fee of $65 and Upland’s fee of $75, while the calculated full cost is most comparable to Monrovia’s fee of $99.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
Glendora Current
Fee
Glendora Total Cost Arcadia Covina La Verne
Manual Meter Read Fee
Fee Average
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Brea Covina La Verne Monrovia Upland
Delinquent Reconnect
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 71
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION METER
Water currently charges a fee of $281 for Temporary Construction Meter. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $292. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions.
Glendora’s current fee is in the middle when compared to other jurisdictions at $281. However, its full cost of $292 is below the jurisdictional average of $314. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to Azusa’s fee of $300.
FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST (FIELD TEST)
Water currently charges a fee of $551 for Fire Hydrant Flow Test (Field Test). Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $882. The following graph shows how Glendora’s current fee and full cost compares to surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
Glendora Current
Fee
Glendora Total
Cost
Azusa Covina La Verne Monrovia
Temporary Construction Meter
Fee Average
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
Glendora
Current Fee
Glendora
Total Cost
Arcadia Azusa Covina La Verne Upland
Fire Hydrant Flow Test (Field Test)
Fee Average
GLENDORA COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 72
Glendora’s current fee is the second highest when compared to other jurisdictions at $551. However, its full cost of $882 is above the jurisdictional average of $348. The City’s current fee and full cost is most comparable to La Verne’s fee of $600.
SUMMARY
Overall, Glendora generally has current fees that are lower when compared to the fees of the other surveyed jurisdictions. Of the surveyed jurisdictions, Glendora’s current fees are most comparable with La Verne, Brea, Upland, Covina, and Azusa, while the City’s full cost calculated is most comparable to fees charged by Azusa, Arcadia, and Monrovia. It is important to note that the results of this survey only show the fees adopted by the council, not the cost recovery policy decisions for departments or a jurisdiction. As such, the results of this survey should be used as a secondary decision-making tool.
City of Glendora
PROPOSED
MASTER SCHEDULE OF
FEES FOR SERVICE
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2026
CITY CLERK
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type City Clerk
Administrative Fees
AD-1 Agenda/ Minutes Mailing Service Agendas Per Page $0.10 AD-2 CC-1 Document Reproduction1 Per Page $0.10 $0.10 GOV § 7922.530 AD-3 CC-2 Campaign Statement Reproduction
Campaign Statement Reproduction Per Page $0.10 $0.10 GOV § 81008 Retrieval Fee Each $5 $5 GOV § 81008
AD-4 CC-3 Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Forms Per Page $0.10 $0.10A Govt Code § 81008(a) AD-5 CC-4 Returned Check Processing
First NSF Check Each $25 $25 CIV § 1719(a)
Each Additional NSF Check Each $35 $35 CIV § 1719(a)
AD-6 CC-5 Video/ Audio Reproduction Per Disc $1 $1 GOV § 7922.530 AD-7 Insurance Administrative Fee Per Application $50
AD-8 Public Works Payroll Records Per Page $1
AD-9 CC-6 Credit Card Service Fee
Finance, Police, City Clerk Minimum Fee Each $2.50 $2.50 Pass Through Service Fee Each 3.2% 3.2% Pass Through
Community Development, Public Works, Minimum Fee Each $6.95 $6.95 Pass Through Service Fee Each 3.2% 3.2% Pass Through
Transient Occupancy Tax Transactions Each 2.5% 2.5% Pass Through Recreation and Human Services Transactions Each 3.0% 3.0% Pass Through AD-11 CC-7 Civil Subpoena
Reproduction Cost Each $15 $15 EVI § 1563(b)(6)
Daily Deposit Per Day $275 $275 Deposit
AD-12 CC-8 Duces Tecum Subpoena Each $15 $15 EVI § 1563(b)(6) AD-13 CC-9 Collection Services Each 15% - 30% 15% - 30% Rate AD-14 Treble Damages
Adult Passport Book and Card Fees
AD-15 CC-10 Passport Book - ages 16 & Over (Valid 10 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $130 $130 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $35 $35 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-11 Passport Card - ages 16 & Over (Valid 10 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $30 $30 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $35 $35 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-12 Passport Card & Book - ages 16 & Over (Valid 10 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $160 $160 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $35 $35 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-13 Passport Renewal - ages 16 & Over (valid 10 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $130 $130 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $0 AD-15 CC-14 Passport Card Renewal - ages 16 & Over (valid 10 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $30 $30 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $0 AD-15 CC1-15 Passport Card & Book Renewal - ages 16 & Over (valid 10 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $160 $160 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $0 Minor Passport Book and Card Fees
AD-15 CC-16 Passport Book- ages 15 & Under (valid 5 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $100 $100 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $35 $35 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-17 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $15 $15 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $35 $35 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-18 Passport Card & Book - ages 15 & Under (valid 5 years) Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $115 $115 22 CFR § 22.1 Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $35 $35 22 CFR § 22.1 Additional Services and Fees
AD-15 CC-19 Passport Photo
Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each $15 $15 22 CFR § 22.1 Electronic Photo Each
AD-15 CC-20 Express Mail to Passport Services for Expedited Applications Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each Actual Actual 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-21 Expedite Fee (2-3 weeks)
Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each $60 $60 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-22 Express Mail to Applicant
Passport Fee Check or Money Order Payable to the DOS Each Actual Actual 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-23 Mail Out Fee for Passport Renewals
Execution Fee Cash/ Check Payable to City of Glendora Each Actual Actual 22 CFR § 22.1 AD-15 CC-24 Notary Public - DS-3053 Each Fees are subject to the Department GOV § 8223 (b) AD-15 CC-25 Notary Public - J ournal Public Request for Line Item Each Fees are subject to the Department GOV § 8223 (b)
1. Duplication charges for electronic records copies are limited to the direct cost of producing the electronic copy, including programming and computer services costs if the request requires the production of electronic records that are otherwise only produced at regularly scheduled intervals, or production of the record would require data compilation, extraction, or programming (8 Cal Code Regs §6253.9).
FINANCE
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Finance
Business License Fees
BLF-1 BLF-1 New Business License Application Review Each BLF-2 BLF-2 Business License Renewal Each
BLF-3 Reprint of Business Licenses Each
BLF-4 BLF-3 Bingo Permit Each
BLF-5 BLF-4 Dance Permit Each
BLF-6 BLF-5 Solicitation and Peddling Permit
First Vendor Each
Each Additional Vendor Each
BL-7 Special Outdoor Display Events Permit
Business Permit Fee Each
Non-Profit Permit Fee Each
BLF-8 BLF-6 Vending Machines, Amusement Devices
Machine Fee Per Machine
Gross Receipt Fee Per Receipt
BLF-9 BLF-7 Business License State Surcharge for American Disabilities Act Compliance Each Business License Taxes
BL-1 BLT-1 Accountants, Architects, Civil Engineers, Geologists, Physicists, Lawyers Each $88 $88 Taxes BL-2 BLT-2
Apartments, Mobile Home Parks, Trailer Parks, Industrial and Commercial Rentals
Each $35 $35 Taxes
BL-3 BLT-3
Apparel & Accessories, Restaurants, Night Clubs, Furniture & Home Furnishings, Appliances, General Merchandise, Liquor or Department Stores, Tires, Batteries, Variety, Trailer Sales, Misc. Goods Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-4 BLT-4
Appraisers, Bookkeepers, Brokers, Consultants, Private Investigators, Taxidermists, Communication Services, Sales Representatives Each $63 $63 Taxes BL-5 BLT-5 Auto Dealers, Gas Stations, Grocery, Meat, Fish, Fruit and Vegetable Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-6 BLT-6 Automotive Repair, Printing Shops, Newspapers, Misc. Retail Firms Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-7 BLT-7 Barber, Beauty Shops, All Other Service Firms at Retail Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-8 BLT-8 Building Materials, Hardware, Farm and Garden Supply Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-9 BLT-9 Circuses, Carnivals Per Day $75 $75 Taxes
BL-10 BLT-10
Collection Agencies, Cosmetologists, Insurance Adjusters, Physical Training Schools, Social Workers, Tree Surgeons Each $48 $48 Taxes BL-11 BLT-11 Delivery Vehicles Per Vehicle $53 $53 Taxes BL-12 BLT-12 Dental Hygienists, Physical Therapists, Oculists Each $58 $58 Taxes BL-13 BLT-13
Dentists, Chiropractors, Physicians, Psychologists, Podiatrists, Optometrists, Pharmacists, Other Medical and Health Specialists Each $88 $88 Taxes BL-14 BLT-14
Drug Stores, Dry Goods, J ewelers,
Laundry, Dry Cleaners Each $35 $35 Taxes
BL-15 BLT-15 Electrical, Plumbing, Heating, Air Conditioning Contractors Each $43 $43 Taxes BL-16 BLT-16 Funeral Home or Mortuary only Each $50 $50 Taxes BL-17 BLT-17 Funeral Chapel & Cemetery, Mortuary & Cemetery Each $100 $100 Taxes BL-18 BLT-18 General Contractors Each $43 $43 Taxes
BL-19 BLT-19 Handbill Distributor Permit Each $15 $15 Taxes BL-20 BLT-20 Hotels, Motels Each $35 $35 Taxes
BL-21 BLT-21 Motion Picture / Television Production Each $750 $750 Taxes BL-22 BLT-22 Outdoor Billboards Each
Tax - Based on size of billboard
(GMC 5.08.060)
Tax - Based on size of
billboard (GMC 5.08.060) Taxes
BL-23 BLT-23 Public Utilities
Franchise Tax Each $150 $150 Taxes
All Others Each $32 $32 Taxes
BL-24 BLT-24 Residential Subdivision Signs Each
Tax - Based on size of sign (GMC
5.08.060)
Tax - Based on size of sign
(GMC 5.08.060) Taxes
BL-25 BLT-25 Rest Homes, Retirement Homes Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-26 BLT-26 Sanitarium, Convalescent Homes, Infirmaries, Hospitals Each $35 $35 Taxes BL-27 BLT-27 Street Vendors Each $50 $50 Taxes
BL-28 BLT-28 Sub-Contractors and All Others Each $43 $43 Taxes BL-29 BLT-29 Wholesale / Manufacturers Each $53 $53 Taxes BL-30 BLT-30 All Other Categories Each $35 $35 Taxes
Transient Occupancy Tax
TOT-1 TOT-2 Transient Occupancy Tax Each 6% 6% Taxes
Special Events
SE-1 Parade/Special Event / Outdoor Display Permit
PD-22 New (PD Parade/ Special Event) Each $580 $607 $605 User Fee BLF-7 Business Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) Each $100 $95 $95 User Fee BLF-7 Non-Profit Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) Each $50 $60 $60 User Fee Repeat (PD Parade/ Special Event) Each $216 $229 $225 User Fee Business Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) Each $100 $95 $95 User Fee Non-Profit Permit Fee (Special Outdoor Event Display) Each $50 $60 $60 User Fee
LIBRARY
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Library
Library Meeting/Event Facilities Fees (Resident Non-Profit) LB-1.1 LB-1.1 Facility Deposit Each $0 $500 $0 Rental
LB-1.2 LB-1.2 Bidwell Forum Per Hour $0 $140 $0 Rental
LB-1.3 LB-1.3 Bidwell Forum with Plaza Per Hour $0 $172 $0 Rental LB-1.4 LB-1.4 Friends Room Per Hour $0 $83 $0 Rental
LB-1.5 LB-1.5 Cleaning Deposit Each $250 $250 $0 Deposit LB-1.6 LB-1.6 Person-on-duty Per Hour Per Pe $25 $58 $25 User Fee LB-1.7 LB-1.7 Alarm Response Per Response $100 $137 $135 Penalty LB-1.8 LB-1.8 Microphone Fee Per Mic $0 $24 $0 Rental
LB-1.9 LB-1.9 Video Equipment (VHS/ DVD Players, TV Monitors, Screens, Laptops, ProjectoFlat $0 $32 $0 Rental Library Meeting/Event Facilities Fees (All Other Groups) LB-2.1 LB-2.1 Facility Deposit Per Event $250 $500 $250 Rental LB-2.2 LB-2.2 Bidwell Forum Per Hour $100 $140 $125 Rental LB-2.3 LB-2.3 Bidwell Forum with Plaza Per Hour $150 $172 $170 Rental LB-2.4 LB-2.4 Friends Room Per Hour $75 $83 $80 Rental
LB-2.5 LB-2.5 Cleaning Deposit (if food or drink are brought in for event) Per Event $250 $250 $250 Deposit LB-2.6 LB-2.6 Person-on-duty Per Hour Per Pe $25 $58 $25 User Fee LB-2.7 LB-2.7 Alarm Response Per Response $100 $137 $135 Penalty LB-2.8 LB-2.8 Microphone Fee Per Mic $10 $24 $20 Rental LB-2.9 LB-2.9 Video Equipment (VHS/ DVD Players, TV Monitors, Screens, Laptops, ProjectoFlat $25 $32 $30 Rental Overdue Materials
LB-3 LB-3.1 Books, Magazines, Pamphlets, Compact Discs & Playaways (Adult & Youth) Each $0 $0 Penalty LB-3 LB-3.2 Videos, DVDs and Software Each $0 $0 Penalty LB-3 LB-3.3 Public Use Laptops/ Tablets Each $0 $0 Penalty Damaged Material
LB-5 LB-4.1 Minimum Charge Each $2 $1 Penalty
LB-5 LB-4.2 Maximum Charge Each
Maximum charge - Replacement
cost of the item (plus processing
fee)
Maximum charge -
Replacement cost of the item
(plus processing fee) Penalty
Lost Material
LB-6 LB-5.1 Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Penalty
LB-6 LB-5.2 Each $975.00 $975 Penalty
LB-6 LB-5.3
Replacement charge for lost items
Replacement charge for lost or stolen public us e laptop/ tablet Materials returned with lost or missing parts Each Assessed and charged accordingly Assessed and charged accordingly Penalty Other Fees and Charges
Processing:
LB-7 LB-6.1
Books, videos, software, compact discs, audio tapes & playaways, laptops/ tablets, All physical materials except magazines, pamphlets & passes Each
Magazines, and pamphlets, and passes Each
LB-7 LB-6.2 Lost Library Card Each
LB-7 LB-6.3 Holds on material:
Per item Unclaimed Each
LB-7 LB-6.4 Interlibrary Loan Request Per search
LB-7 LB-6.5 Administrating/ proctoring tests Per test
LB-7 LB-6.6 Printouts & Photocopies
Black & White Per Page $0.15 $0.15 GOV § 7922.530
Color Per Page $0.30 $0.30 GOV § 7922.530
LB-7 LB-6.7 Faxing - Incoming Faxes Each $0.50 $0.50 Pass Through LB-7 LB-6.8 Faxing - Outgoing Faxes Each $0 $0 No Charge LB-7 LB-6.9 Scanning to USB/ email/ smartphone/ tablet Each $0 $0 Materials LB-7 LB-6.10 Supplied Office/ Stationary Materials Each $0-$25 $0-$25 Materials LB-7 LB-6.11 Supplies at City-wide Special Events Each $0-$25 $0-$25 Materials
RECREATION &
HUMAN SERVICES
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Recreation & Human Services
CS-1 RHS-1 Adult Sports Each $300 - $400 $300 - $400 User Fee CS-2 RHS-2 Contract Recreation Classes Each 25% - 30% 25% - 30% Rate CS-3 RHS-3 Day Camp Program Per Child Per W $150-$175 $150-$175 User Fee CS-4 RHS-4 La Fetra Center Events Each $4 - $25 $4 - $25 User Fee CS-5 RHS-5 La Fetra Class Activities Each $4 - $100 $4 - $100 User Fee CS-6 RHS-6 La Fetra Activities Each $4 $4 User Fee
CS-7 RHS-7 Parks Playground Trips Per Child $10 - $20 $10 - $20 User Fee CS-8 RHS-8 Teen Center Activities
Teen Center Trips Per Participant $6 - $60 $6 - $60 User Fee Events Per Person $0 - $10 $0 - $10 User Fee
CS-9 RHS-9 Trips and Tours Per Person $20 - $150 $20 - $150 User Fee CS-10 RHS-10 Administration Fee Per Class $10 $10 User Fee CS-11 RHS-11 Refund Fee Per Refund $10 $10 User Fee
CS-12 RHS-12 Activity Guide Advertisement
Quarter Page Each $250 $250 User Fee
Half Page Each $500 $500 User Fee
Full Page Each $1,000 $1,000 User Fee
CS-13 RHS-13 Youth Basketball Per Player $120 - $140 $120 - $140 User Fee CS-14 RHS-14 Sanctioned Youth Sports, per player field charge Per Player $10 - $25 $10 - $25 User Fee Facility Rentals
SCOUT HUT**
Glendora Scout Troops:
Group 1 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 2
Seasonal Each $40 $40 Rental
Annual Each $70 $70 Rental
Group 3
Seasonal Each $80 $80 Rental
Annual Each $140 $140 Rental
Group 4 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $0 Rental
1-Room
Group 1 Per Hour $50 $50 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $50 $50 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $100 $100 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $125 $125 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $150 $150 Rental
2-Room
Group 1 Per Hour $75 $75 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $150 $150 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $175 $175 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $200 $200 Rental
Cleaning
Group 1 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 2 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 3 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 4 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 5 Each $125 $125 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 2 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 3 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 4 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 5 Each $100 $100 Rental
Staff*
Group 1 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 2 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 3 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 4 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 5 Each $25 $25 Rental
*If alcohol is being served at any building rental, renter must pay for an additional staff member, regardless of party size. **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
LEGION BUILDING**
Main Hall
Group 1 Per Hour $100 $100 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $150 $150 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $225 $225 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $250 $250 Rental
Staff 75/1*:
Group 1 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 2 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 3 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 4 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 5 Each $25 $25 Rental
Cleaning Fee
Group 1 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 2 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 3 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 4 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 5 Each $125 $125 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 2 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 3 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 4 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 5 Each $300 $300 Rental
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type A/V Equipment (optional)
Group 1 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 2 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 4 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 5 Each $75 $75 Rental
*If alcohol is being served at any building rental, renter must pay for an additional staff member, regardless of party size. **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
BIG TREE PARK -2 hr reservation, 50 chairs, 1 table and staff set up** Reservation Fee
Group 1 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 2 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 3 Each $400 $400 Rental
Group 4 Each $500 $500 Rental
Group 5 Each $500 $500 Rental
Facility Deposit*
Group 1 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 2 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 3 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 5 Each $200 $200 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
*For Glendora Scouts, key deposit only, all other fees waived **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
BIG DALTON - Amphitheater or Outside Girl Scout Cabin Area** Glendora Scout Troops
Group 1 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each
Group 3 Each
Group 4 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $0 Rental
Day Use
Group 1 Each $40 $40 Rental
Group 2 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 3 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 5 Each $350 $350 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 2 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 3 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 4 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 5 Each $100 $100 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
Key Deposit
Group 1 Each $50 $50 Rental
Group 2 Each $50 $50 Rental
Group 3 Each $50 $50 Rental
Group 4 Each $50 $50 Rental
Group 5 Each $50 $50 Rental
**Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
PARK SPECIAL EVENTS - 2 hr Minimum**
Day Use
Group 1 Per Hour $35 $35 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $60 $60 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $85 $85 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $110 $110 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $160 $160 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 2 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 3 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 5 Each $200 $200 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
**Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
TEEN CENTER**
Teen Center
Group 1 Per Hour $240 $240 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $250 $250 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $500 $500 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $700 $700 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $725 $725 Rental
Gymnasium
Group 1 Per Hour $80 $80 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $125 $125 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $225 $225 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $250 $250 Rental
Meeting Room
Group 1 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 4 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 5 Each $150 $150 Rental
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Staff 75/1*
Group 1 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 2 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 3 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 4 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 5 Each $25 $25 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 2 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 3 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 5 Each $200 $200 Rental
*If alcohol is being served at any building rental, renter must pay for an additional staff member, regardless of party size. **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
LA FETRA SENIOR CENTER -2 hr minimum**
Sage Room
Group 1 Per Hour $100 $100 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $150 $150 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $185 $185 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $225 $225 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $250 $250 Rental
Staff 75/1*
Group 1 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 2 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 3 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 4 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 5 Each $25 $25 Rental
Cleaning Fee
Group 1 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 2 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 3 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 4 Each $125 $125 Rental
Group 5 Each $125 $125 Rental
Administration
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
A/V Equipment (optional)
Group 1 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 2 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 4 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 5 Each $75 $75 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 2 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 3 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 4 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 5 Each $300 $300 Rental
Oak/ Elm Room
Group 1 Per Hour $100 $100 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $150 $150 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $225 $225 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $250 $250 Rental
Staff 75/1*
Group 1 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 2 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 3 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 4 Each $25 $25 Rental
Group 5 Each $25 $25 Rental
Cleaning Fee
Group 1 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 2 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 4 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 5 Each $75 $75 Rental
Administration
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
A/V Equipment (optional)
Group 1 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 2 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 4 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 5 Each $75 $75 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 2 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 3 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 4 Each $300 $300 Rental
Group 5 Each $300 $300 Rental
*If alcohol is being served at any building rental, renter must pay for an additional staff member, regardless of party size. **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type CARLYLE LINDER EQUESTRIAN PARK**
North or South Riding Ring
Group 1 Per Hour $25 $25 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $60 $60 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $85 $85 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $110 $110 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $0 $0 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 2 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 3 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Each $500 $500 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $0 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $0 Rental
Picnic Shelter
Group 1 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each Same as Park Picnic Reservations Same as Park Picnic Reservations Rental Group 3 Each Same as Park Picnic Reservations Same as Park Picnic Reservations Rental Group 4 Each Same as Park Picnic Reservations Same as Park Picnic Reservations Rental Group 5 Each $0 $0 Rental
Snack Bar
Group 1 Per Hour $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $50 $50 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $75 $75 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $100 $100 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $0 $0 Rental
**Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
PARK PICNIC RESERVATION AREA
Day Use
Group 1
4 Hours Each $20 $20 Rental
8 Hours Each $40 $40 Rental
Group 2
4 Hours Each $25 $25 Rental
8 Hours Each $50 $50 Rental
Group 3
4 Hours Each $30 $30 Rental
8 Hours Each $60 $60 Rental
Group 4
4 Hours Each $50 $50 Rental
8 Hours Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 5
4 Hours Each $75 $75 Rental
8 Hours Each $150 $150 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
Park Picnic Reservation - Finkbiner Park Large Shade Structure Site Day Use Side 1 or 2 (4 hours)
Group 1 Each $70 $70 Rental
Group 2 Each $75 $75 Rental
Group 3 Each $80 $80 Rental
Group 4 Each $100 $100 Rental
Group 5 Each $125 $125 Rental
Side 1 or 2 (8 hours)
Group 1 Each $130 $130 Rental
Group 2 Each $140 $140 Rental
Group 3 Each $150 $150 Rental
Group 4 Each $190 $190 Rental
Group 5 Each $190 $190 Rental
Both 1 & 2 (4 hours)
Group 1 Each $135 $135 Rental
Group 2 Each $140 $140 Rental
Group 3 Each $145 $145 Rental
Group 4 Each $185 $185 Rental
Group 5 Each $190 $190 Rental
Both 1 & 2 (8 hours)
Group 1 Each $240 $240 Rental
Group 2 Each $250 $250 Rental
Group 3 Each $255 $255 Rental
Group 4 Each $295 $295 Rental
Group 5 Each $295 $295 Rental
Administrative Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
DAWSON TENNIS COURTS - 6 courts
Day Use
Group 1 per court per ho $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 per court per ho $5 $5 Rental
Group 3 per court per ho $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 per court per ho $20 $20 Rental
Group 5 per court per ho $25 $25 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type
VOLLEYBALL COURT
Day Use
Group 1 per court per ho $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 per court per ho $5 $5 Rental
Group 3 per court per ho $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 per court per ho $20 $20 Rental
Group 5 per court per ho $25 $25 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $0 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
CENTENNIAL HERITAGE PARK**
Day Use
Group 1 Per Hour $35 $35 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $60 $60 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $85 $85 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $110 $110 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $160 $160 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 2 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 3 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 4 Each $200 $200 Rental
Group 5 Each $200 $200 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 2 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 3 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 4 Each $10 $10 Rental
Group 5 Each $10 $10 Rental
**Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
POMPEI TURF FIELDS**
Field Rental
Group 1 Per Hour $0-$50* $205 $0-$50* Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $30 $205 $30 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $50 $205 $50 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $100 $205 $100 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $150 $205 $150 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $200 $205 $200 Rental
Lights
Group 1 Per Hour $12 $12 $12 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $15 $12 $15 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $15 $12 $15 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $20 $12 $20 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $25 $12 $25 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $30 $12 $30 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Per Hour $10 $31 $10 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $10 $31 $10 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $10 $31 $10 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $10 $31 $10 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $10 $31 $10 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $10 $31 $10 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $0 $648 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each $0 $648 $0 Rental
Group 3 Each $0 $648 $0 Rental
Group 4 Each $0 $648 $0 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $648 $0 Rental
Group 6 Each $500 $648 $500 Rental
*Individual Agreements are in place with each organization **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
FINKBINER PARK FIELDS**
Field Rental
Group 1 Per Hour $0-$50* $66 $0-$50* Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $15 $66 $15 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $20 $66 $20 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $40 $66 $40 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $80 $66 $80 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $100 $66 $100 Rental
Lights
Group 1 Per Hour $12 $12 $12 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $15 $12 $15 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $15 $12 $15 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $20 $12 $20 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $25 $12 $25 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $30 $12 $30 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Per Hour $10 $38 $10 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $10 $38 $10 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $10 $38 $10 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $10 $38 $10 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $10 $38 $10 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $10 $38 $10 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $0 $236 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each $0 $236 $0 Rental
Group 3 Each $0 $236 $0 Rental
Group 4 Each $0 $236 $0 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $236 $0 Rental
Group 6 Each $500 $236 $500 Rental
*Individual Agreements are in place with each organization **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type GLENDORA UNIFIED FIELDS**
Field Rental
Group 1 Per Hour $0-$50* $199 $0-$50* Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $15 $199 $15 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $20 $199 $20 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $40 $199 $40 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $80 $199 $80 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $100 $199 $100 Rental
Lights
Group 1 Per Hour $12 $12 $12 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $15 $12 $15 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $15 $12 $15 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $20 $12 $20 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $25 $12 $25 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $30 $12 $30 Rental
Administration Fee
Group 1 Per Hour $10 $89 $10 Rental
Group 2 Per Hour $10 $89 $10 Rental
Group 3 Per Hour $10 $89 $10 Rental
Group 4 Per Hour $10 $89 $10 Rental
Group 5 Per Hour $10 $89 $10 Rental
Group 6 Per Hour $10 $89 $10 Rental
Facility Deposit
Group 1 Each $0 $688 $0 Rental
Group 2 Each $0 $688 $0 Rental
Group 3 Each $0 $688 $0 Rental
Group 4 Each $0 $688 $0 Rental
Group 5 Each $0 $688 $0 Rental
Group 6 Each $500 $688 $500 Rental
*Individual Agreements are in place with each organization **Insurance is required for the rental of the noted buildings/ facilities.
Transportation
P-54 RHS-15 Public Transit Service
One-way trip within Glendora City Limits Each $0.50 $0.50 User Fee One-way trip within Azusa, Covina, or San Dimas Each $1.50 $1.50 User Fee One-way trip within Baldwin Park, Duarte, Pomona, or West Covina Each $4 $4 User Fee Fixed Route Service Fare Structure
General Each $1 $1 User Fee
Student Each $0.75 $0.75 User Fee
Senior Citizen (62+)/ Disabled Each $0.50 $0.50 User Fee Monthly Fare Booklet Fare Structure (Per 30 trips)
Senior (62+)/ Disabled Each $15 $15 User Fee
Student Each $18 $18 User Fee
General Each $30 $30 User Fee
P-55 RHS-16 Transportation
MTA Bus Pass Each $7 - $220 $7 - $220 User Fee
Foot-hill Transit Bus Passes Each $22 - $170 $22 - $170 User Fee TAP Card Products Each $2 - $300 $2 - $300 User Fee
Discount Each $7 $7 User Fee
PLANNING
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Planning
P-1 P-1 Animal Conditional Use Permit Per Application $1,665 $1,665 User Fee P-2 P-2 Annexation Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-3 P-3 Appeal to City Council
Appeals Each
Initial Deposit Each $2,000 $3,035 $3,000 Deposit
Subsequent Deposits Each $1,000 $1,517 $1,500 Deposit
P-4 P-4 Appeal to Planning Commission (e.g. Development Plans, CUPs) Appeals Each
Initial Deposit Each
Subsequent Deposits Each
P-5 Building Address Processing w/ o Map Per Application P-6 Building Investigation Per Investigation
P-7 Building Permit Surcharge for NPDES (SWPPP) Inspections Each P-8 Building Plan Check/ Inspection Each
P-9 Building Re-Address Processing Per Application
P-10 Building Re-inspection Per Inspection
P-11 P-5 Certificate of Compliance Per Application $1,481 $1,068 $1,000 User Fee Technical Review Actual Costs
P-13 P-6 Conceptual Review Per Application $1,041 $5,132 $2,000 User Fee P-14 P-7 Conditional Use Permit Per Application $2,425 $4,904 $3,500 User Fee P-15 P-8 Development Agreement Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-16 P-9 Development Plan Review – Minor
Director Each $2,483 $4,374 $4,300 User Fee
Commission Each $3,297 $4,981 $4,900 User Fee
P-17 P-10 Development Plan Review – Major Each $5,000 $7,233 $7,200 User Fee P-18 P-11 Environmental Impact Report Review Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-19 P-12 Environmental Initial Study Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-20 P-13 Environmental: Categorical Exemption Review Per Application $214 $427 $400 User Fee P-21 Fire Hood/ Duct Plan Check/ Inspection Each
P-22 FOG (Fire, Oil and Gas) Application Fee for New Restaurants Each P-23 FOG Program Inspections Each
P-24 FOG Program Wastewater Sampling and Analysis Each
P-25 FOG Program, Industrial, Automotive, and Gas Station Re-inspection Fee Each P-27.1 P-14 General Plan Amendment - Map Each $4,000 $8,623 $8,600 User Fee P-27.2 P-15 General Plan Amendment - Other Each $15,000 $8,623 $8,600 User Fee P-29 P-16 Business License Zoning Verification Per Application $29 $100 $100 User Fee P-30 P-17 Landscape Plans Applications Each $400 $351 $300 User Fee P-31 P-18 Legal Review of CC&Rs Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee Spec-15 Lost Inspection Card Per Card
P-33 P-19 Lot Line Adjustment Per Application $1,554 $710 $700 User Fee Technical Review Actual Costs
P-34 P-20 Lot Merger Per Application $1,554 $710 $700 User Fee Technical Review Actual Costs
P-35 P-21 Minor Modification Per Application $1,422 $3,767 $3,700 User Fee P-36 P-22 Mitigation Monitoring Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-37 P-23 Modification Review (CUP or Variance) Per Application $2,067 $3,767 $3,700 User Fee P-38 P-24 Planned Development Each $10,000 $8,623 $8,600 User Fee P-39 P-25 Planned Redevelopment Each $10,000 $8,623 $8,600 User Fee P-40 Radius Map and Labels Each
P-41 P-26 Reversion to Acreage Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-42 P-27 Review of CC&Rs Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-43 P-28 Sign Variance Per Application $1,951 $1,186 $1,100 User Fee P-44 P-29 Specific Plan Review Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-45 P-30 Street/Sidewalk Vendor Permit
New Permit Each $275 $248 $200 User Fee
Renewals Each $165 $124 $100 User Fee
Spec-12 Temporary Occupancy Review Per Application
P-47 P-31 Tentative Parcel Map Review (Lot Split) Per Application $4,006 $4,235 $4,000 User Fee P-32 SB9 Lot Split Applications Administrative Subdivision (SB 9, SB 684, and AB Each New $4,635 $4,000 User Fee P-48 P-33 Tentative Tract Map (Subdivision) Each $5,286 $5,436 $5,400 User Fee P-49 P-34 Time Extension Review Per Application $1,042 $731 $700 User Fee P-50 P-35 Variance Per Application $2,224 $3,767 $3,700 User Fee P-51.1 P-36 Zone Change - Map Each $4,000 $8,623 $8,600 User Fee P-51.2 P-37 Zone Change - Other Each $15,000 $8,623 $8,600 User Fee P-52 P-38 Zoning Verification Letter Each $214 $1,642 $1,600 User Fee P-53 P-39 Public Hearing - Postage/ Publication Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee P-54 Public Transit Service
One-way trip within Glendora City Limits Each
One-way trip within Azusa, Covina, or San Dimas Each
One-way trip within Baldwin Park, Duarte, Pomona, or West Covina Each Fixed Route Service Fare Structure
General Each
Student Each
Senior Citizen (62+)/ Disabled Each
Monthly Fare Booklet Fare Structure
Senior (62+)/ Disabled Each
Student Each
General Each
P-55 Transportation
MTA Bus Pass Each
Foot-hill Transit Bus Passes Each
TAP Card Products Each
Discount Each
P-56 P-40 Temporary Sign/ Banner Permit Per Application $45 $579 $500 User Fee P-57 P-41 Conditional Use Permit - Minor Each $1,315 $731 $700 User Fee P-58 P-42 Recreational Vehicle Administrative Review Permit Appeal Each $200 $579 $200 Deposit P-43 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
Eligible Facility Requests (EFR) Each New $1,338 $1,000 User Fee Minor Wireless Facility Permit Each New $6,195 $2,500 User Fee Major Wireless Facility Permit Each New $8,623 $5,000 User Fee P-44 SB330 Applications Each New $883 $800 User Fee
Technical Review (Applicable to Administrative Subdivisions, Tentative Parcel Map / Tentative Tract Map, Certificate of Compiance, Lot Line Adjustment, and Lot Merger) New Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee Surcharges
P-45 Technology % of Permit 13% 19.0% 19.0% Surcharge
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Community Art Program (CAP)
P-66 P-46 CAP - Requirement Contribution to In- Lieu Community Art Fund BPV (building permit valuation) - New commercial / industrial & mixed use with residential as ancillary component (with BPV of $375,000+). % of Building Pe 1% 1% Impact Fee
BPV - New tenant improvements to existing commercial /
industrial & mixed use with residential as ancillary component (with BPV of $375,000+). % of Building Pe 0.50% 0.50% Impact Fee BPV - New residential of 11 or more units / houses and new mixed use with residential as primary component. % of Building Pe 0.25% 0.25% Impact Fee Misc. Fees
P-67 P-47 Park Development Fees
Residential Each $2,273 $2,273 Reso 2012-46
Additional Bedroom Beyond 3 Bedrooms Each $200 $200 Reso 2012-46 Second Dwellings, Apartment and Condo units Per Residential $1,591 $1,591 Reso 2012-46 Commercial construction fee Per Sq. Ft. $0.62 $0.62 Reso 2012-46 Outdoor Dining Fees
P-65 P-48 Outdoor Dining
Parklet User Per Year $400 $1,191 $1,190 User Fee
Sidewalk Dining Per Year $150 $418 $415 User Fee
BUILDING &
SAFETY
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Building & Safety
B&S-1 Intake Processing Fee Each $25 $31 $31 User Fee
Building Permit Application Fee
BP-1.1 BP-1.1 $1 to $500 Each $23.50 $124.38 $124.38 User Fee BP-1.2 BP-1.2 $501 to $2,000
First $500 Each $23.50 $124.38 $124.38 User Fee
Each Additional $100 Each $3.05 $5.13 $5.13 User Fee
BP-1.3 BP-1.3 $2,001 to $25,000
First $2,000 Each $69.25 $201.37 $201.37 User Fee
Each additional $1,000 Each $14.00 $16.48 $16.48 User Fee BP-1.4 BP-1.4 $25,001 to $50,000
First $25,000 Each $391.25 $580.38 $580.38 User Fee
Each additional $1,000 Each $10.10 $13.74 $13.74 User Fee BP-1.5 BP-1.5 $50,001 to $100,000
First $50,000 Each $643.75 $923.90 $923.90 User Fee
Each additional $1,000 Each $7.00 $7.94 $7.94 User Fee
BP-1.6 BP-1.6 $100,001 to $500,000
First $100,000 Each $993.75 $1,320.77 $1,320.77 User Fee Each additional $1,000 Each $5.60 $4.75 $4.75 User Fee
BP-1.7 BP-1.7 $500,001 to $1,000.000
First $500,000 Each $3,233.75 $3,221.92 $3,221.92 User Fee Each additional $1,000 Each $4.75 $4.41 $4.41 User Fee
BP-1.8 BP-1.8 $1,000,000 to $5,000,000
First $1,000,000 Each $5,608.75 $5,425.00 $5,425.00 User Fee Each additional $1,000 Each $3.15 $0.55 $0.55 User Fee
N/ A BP-1.9 $5,000,000 to $10,000,000
First $5,000,000 Each Modified $7,628.08 $7,628.08 User Fee Each additional $1,000 Each Modified $0.53 $0.53 User Fee N/ A BP-1.10 $10,000,000 to $25,000,000
First $10,000,000 Each Modified $10,257.88 $10,257.88 User Fee Each additional $1,000 Each Modified $0.39 $0.39 User Fee N/ A BP-1.11 $25,000,000+
First $25,000,000 Each Modified $16,109.59 $16,109.59 User Fee Each additional $1,000 Each Modified $0.20 $0.20 User Fee Plan Check Fees
BP-2 Building Plan Check Fee % of Building Pe 65% 65% 65% User Fee BP-3 Additional Building Plan Check Fee Per Hour New $209 $209 User Fee BP-4 Mechanical, Electrical, or Plumbing Plan Check Fee Per Hour New $209 $209 User Fee BP-5 Sewer Plan Check Fee Per Hour New $209 $209 User Fee Building Permit Fees - Other Inspections and Fees
BP-2.1 BP-3.1 Inspections outside of normal businesshours (minimum charge - two hours) Per Hour $94 $146 $145 User Fee P-2.2 Re-inspection fees assessed underprovisions of the California Building Code Per Hour* BP-2.3 BP-3.2 Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated Per Hour $47 $118 $115 User Fee BP-2.4 BP-3.3 Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions on plans Per Hour $47 $209 $205 User Fee BP-2.5 BP-3.4 For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost s x Other Building permit Application fees
BP-3 Fire Suppression Each
BP-3 Factory Built Fireplace Each
BP-3 Masonry Fireplace Each
BP-3 Light Standards Each
BP-3 Monument Each
P-5 OBP-1 Building Address Processing w/ o Map Per Application $555 $426 $425 User Fee P-6 Building Investigation Per Investigation
P-7 OBP-2 Building Permit Surcharge for NPDES (SWPPP) Inspections Each 5% 5% 5% Surcharge Building Plan Check/ Inspection File Maintenance Each
P-8 OBP-3 Building Re-Address Processing Per Application $555 $426 $425 User Fee P-9 Building Re-inspection Per Inspection
P-12 OBP-4 Change of Occupancy Per Application $185 $923 $920 User Fee P-20 Fire Alarm Plan Check/ Inspection Valuation-Based
P-21 Fire Hood/ Duct Plan Check/ Inspection Valuation-Based P-32 Lost Inspection Card Per Card
P-46 OBP-5 Temporary Occupancy Review Per Application $225 $440 $440 User Fee Combo Permits - Single Family Residential
CP-1 Bathroom Remodel / Kitchen Remodel (no structural changes) Each New $290 $290 User Fee CP-2 EV Charging Station Each New $171 $170 User Fee
CP-3 Energy Storage System (ESS) Each New $299 $295 User Fee CP-4 Residential HVAC Replacement Each New $228 $225 User Fee CP-5 Swimming Pool / Spa Each New $1,131 $1,130 User Fee Electrical Permit Application
Elec - 1 Elec - 1 Receptacles/Lights/Switches Per Outlet $1.40 $3.95 $3.95 User Fee First 20 Each
Additional over 20 Each
Lighting Fixtures: Per Fixture
First 20 Each
Additional over 20 Each
Elec - 3 Elec - 2
Fixed Appliances & Dedicated Outlets (Ranges, Dryers, Water Heaters, Cooktops, Dishwashers, etc.) Each $5.65 $7.89 $7.89 User Fee Dishwasher/ Stationary Cooktop/ Stationary Appliance Each Elec - 5 Elec - 3 Motors Each Modified $39 $35 User Fee 1 Each
2 Each
11 Each
51 Each
101 Each
500 Each
Combined Rating Not Over
1 Each
10 Each
50 Each
100 Each
500 Each
Elec - 6 Elec - 4 Signs Each $56.35 $88 $85 User Fee
Elec - 7 Elec - 5 Timers Each $14.10 $47 $45 User Fee
Elec - 8 Elec - 6 Service 0-600V
Not Over 200 225 Amp Each $70.27 $118.42 $115 User Fee
Over 200 225 amp Each $56.35 $148 $145 User Fee
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Elec - 7 New Dwellings Per Sq. Ft. $0.07 $0.10 $0.10 User Fee Elec - 11 Elec - 8 Temporary Power Poles Each $28.25 $118 $115 User Fee Elec - 12 Elec - 9 Temporary Distribution Poles Each $14.10 $59 $55 User Fee Elec - 13 Elec - 10 Carnival Ride / Attraction Per Attraction $23.50 $59 $55 User Fee Elec - 14 Elec - 11 Swimming Pool/ Spas Each $61.35 $177 $175 User Fee Elec - 15 Elec - 12 Where No Fee is Set Each $75 $88 $85 User Fee Elec - 13 Minimum Permit Fee Each New $118 $115 User Fee Elec - 16 Elec - 14 Issuance Fee Per Permit Each $42 $53 $50 User Fee Plumbing Permit Application
Plum - 1 Plum-1 Toilet Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee
Plum - 2 Plum-2 Bath Tub Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee
Plum - 3 Plum-3 Shower Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee
Plum - 4 Plum-4 Wash Basin Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee Plum - 5 Plum-5 Kitchen Sink Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee Plum - 6 Plum-6 Dishwasher Each $15 $29 $25 User Fee
Plum - 7 Plum-7 Laundry Tub or Tray Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee Plum - 8 Plum-8 Automatic Washer Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee Plum - 9 Plum-9 Water Heater Each $40.57 $59 $55 User Fee Plum - 10 Plum-10 Solar Water Heater Each $31.50 $118 $115 User Fee Plum - 11 Plum-11 Water Softener Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee Plum - 12 Plum-12 Gas System (up to 5 Outlets) Each $15 $59 $55 User Fee Plum - 13 Plum-13 Additional Gas Outlet Over 5 Each $2.65 $11 $10 User Fee Plum - 14 Plum-14 Floor Drain Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee Plum - 15 Plum-15 Lawn Sprinkler System Each $17 $59 $55 User Fee Plum - 16 Plum-16 Misc. Water Piping Each $15 $59 $55 User Fee Plum - 17 Plum-17 Swimming Pool Piping Each $24.25 $88 $85 User Fee Plum-18 Pea Trap Each
Plum - 19 Plum-18 Where No Fee is Set Each $75 $88 $85 User Fee Plum-19 Minimum Permit Fee Each New $118 $115 User Fee
Plum - 20 Plum-20 Issuance Fee Per Permit Each $42 $53 $50 User Fee Mechanical Permit Application
MP-1 MP-1 Refrigeration Compressor Each Modified $88 $85 User Fee MP-2 Absorption Unit Each Modified $88 $85 User Fee
MP-3 Boiler Each Modified $88 $85 User Fee
Vented Decorative Appliance
Up to 100,000 BTU Up to 1,000,000 BTU
Over 1,000,000 BTU
MP-4 Fuel Burning Heater or Furnace Each Modified $88 $85 User Fee MP-2 MP-5 Air Handling Unit Each Modified $88 $85 User Fee Air Handling Unit Each
Up to 2,000 CFM Up to 10,000 CFM Over Each
10,000 CFM Each
MP-3 MP-6 Air Inlet or Outlet Each $7.90 $15 $15 User Fee MP-4 MP-7 Appliance Vent (not included above) Each $7.90 $41 $40 User Fee MP-5 MP-8 Evaporative Cooler Each $12.80 $88 $85 User Fee MP-6 MP-9 Ventilation Fans Each $11.30 $29 $25 User Fee MP-7 Additional Fans Over 10 Each
MP-8 Ventilation System Each
MP-9 MP-10 Residential Kitchen Hood & Exhaust System Each $39 $59 $55 User Fee MP-9 MP-11 Commercial Kitchen Hood & Exhaust System Each New $88 $85 User Fee MP-10 MP-12 Spray Booth, Exhaust System Each $39 $118 $115 User Fee MP-11 MP-13 Fire Dampers Each $7.50 $88 $85 User Fee
MP-12 MP-14 Alter Duct System (not included above) Each $18.50 $88 $85 User Fee MP-13 MP-15 Where No Fee is Set Each $75 $88 $85 User Fee MP-16 Minimum Permit Fee Each New $118 $115 User Fee
MP-14 MP-17 Issuance Fee Per Permit Each $42 $53 $50 User Fee Sewer Permit Application
SWR-1 SP-1 Building Sewer Connection to Public Sewer Each $56.75 $118 $115 User Fee SWR-2 SP-2 Septic Tank, Seepage Pit, or Drain Field Per Unit $84.75 $207 $205 User Fee SWR-3 Overflow Seepage Pit Drain field Ext. Each
SWR-4 SP-3 Connect Additional Building/ Work Each $28.25 $118 $115 User Fee SWR-5 SP-4 Alter, Repair or Abandon Building Sewer Each $28.25 $118 $115 User Fee SWR-6 Saddle Main Line Each
SWR-7 Excavation (Under Sidewalk/ Public Improvement) Each SWR-8 SP-5 Grease Interceptor Each $56.75 $177 $175 User Fee SWR-9 SP-6 Where No Fee is Set Each $75.00 $118 $115 User Fee SWR-10 SP-7 Minimum Permit Fee Each New $118 $115 User Fee SWR-11 SP-8 Issuance Fee Per Permit Each $42 $53 $50 User Fee Building Valuation Data for Specialty Items
Spec-1 Spec-1 Patio (Open)
Valuation will be equal to an open carport as set by the Annual Building Valuation Data. Per Square Foot $31 $31
Carport - of garage value with a minimum plan check fee of $142 Per Square Foot 68.30% 68.30% Spec-2 Spec-2 Patio (Closed)
Valuation will be equal to twice the valuation used for an open patio Per Square Foot $62 $62 Minimum plan check fee of $142 Per Square Foot
Spec-3 & 4 Spec-3 Composition or Build Up Roof
Fiberglass Per Square Foot $3 $3
All Other Roofing Material Per Square Foot $3 $3
Spec-5 Swimming Pools
Spec-6 Pool and Spa
Spec-7 Spec-4 Walls
Spec-8 Spec-5 Walls
Spec-9 Spec-5 Sign Fees
Spec-10 Fire Alarm Plan Check/ Inspection Each
Spec-11 Change of Occupancy Per Application
Spec-12 Temporary Occupancy Review Per application
Spec-13 Spec-6 Building Re-inspection Per inspection $72 $171 $170 User Fee Spec-14 Spec-7 Investigation Per Investigatio $170 $316 $315 User Fee Spec-15 Spec-8 Lost Inspection Card Per Card $42 $112 $110 User Fee Spec-16 Spec-9 Commercial Solar
50kw or Less Flat $1,000 $1,190 $1,000 Gov. Code 66015 (b) 50-250kW (Base) Base $1,000 $1,190 $1,000 Gov. Code 66015 (b) 50-250kW (per kW above 50 kW) Per kw $7 $5 $7 Gov. Code 66015 (b) 250 kW (Base) Base $2,400 $2,221 $2,400 Gov. Code 66015 (b) 250 kW (per kW above 250 kW) Per kw $5 $4 $5 Gov. Code 66015 (b) Spec-17 Spec-10 Residential Solar:
Base Flat $500 $545 $450 GOV § 66015 (a)
Per Kw above 15Kw per Kw $15 $16 $15 GOV § 66015 (a)
Surcharges
S-1 General Plan Maintenance % of Permit 12% 13% 13% Surcharge S-2 Technology % of Permit 13% 19% 19% Surcharge
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Environmental Services
FOG Fees
P-22 ES-1 FOG (Fats, Oil and Grease) Application Fee for New Restaurants Each $250 $274 $270 User Fee P-23 ES-2 FOG Program Inspections Each $180 $193 $190 User Fee P-24 FOG Program Wastewater Sampling and Analysis Each
P-25 ES-3 FOG Program, Industrial, Automotive, and Gas Station Re-inspection Fee Each $100 $193 $190 User Fee National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Services (NPDES) E-61 ES-4 NPDES - Current Construction Inspection Each $145 $382 $380 User Fee ES-5 NPDES - Current Construction Re-inspection Each New $191 $190 User Fee E-62 ES-6 NPDES Automotive Inspection
Inspection Each $240 $257 $255 User Fee
Follow-up Each $150 $177 $175 User Fee
E-63 ES-7 NPDES Gas Station Inspection
Inspection Each $230 $257 $255 User Fee
Follow-up Each $150 $177 $175 User Fee
E-64 ES-8 NPDES Industrial Inspection
Inspection Each $270 $385 $385 User Fee
Follow-up Each $150 $281 $280 User Fee
E-65 ES-9 NPDES Restaurant Inspection
Inspection Each $140 $192 $190 User Fee
Follow-up Each $150 $156 $155 User Fee
E-66 ES-10 NPDES - Nursery
Inspection Each $240 $257 $255 User Fee
Follow-up Each $150 $177 $175 User Fee
E-67 ES-11 NPDES Non-Industrial Inspection
Inspection Each $240 $257 $255 User Fee
Follow-up Each $150 $177 $175 User Fee
Other Fees
ES-12 Environmental Services Hourly Fee Per Hour New $183 $180 User Fee
ENGINEERING
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Engineering
E-1 E-1 Street Name Signs Per Set $310 $411 $410 User Fee E-2 E-2 Traffic Signs Per Sign $300 $1,098 $1,095 User Fee E-3 E-3 Street Lights (Administration)
Administration Fee Per Light $350 $555 $555 User Fee
Marbelite Deposit $3,000 $3,000 Pass Through
Double Davit Deposit $4,200 $4,200 Pass Through
E-4 E-4 Curb Stenciling Per Lot $11 $32 $30 User Fee
Parcel Map/Tract Map Development Fees
E-5 E-5 Final Parcel Map Review Per Application $1,805 $3,337 $3,335 User Fee E-6 E-6 Final Tract Map Review
Application Per Application $1,954 $3,658 $3,655 User Fee Over 4 lots Each $13 $45 $45 User Fee
E-7 E-7 Final Map Amendment Review Per Application $550 $3,077 $3,075 User Fee E-8 E-8 Street Name Processing w/ o Map Per Application $2,011 $2,304 $2,300 User Fee E-9 E-9 Street Re-Name Processing Per Application $2,011 $2,304 $2,300 User Fee E-10 E-10 Street/ Right-of-Way Abandonment Processing Per Application $1,774 $2,033 $2,030 User Fee E-11 E-11 Building Address or Re-Address Processing without Map Per Application $555 $695 $695 User Fee Drainage
E-12 E-12 Drainage Plan/Check/Inspections/ SWPP
Single-Family / ADU Each $350 $625 $625 User Fee
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each Actual Cost $993 $990 User Fee E-16 E-13 Geotechnical/Soils Report Review
Single-Family / ADU Each $550 $774 $770 User Fee
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each Actual Cost $1,001 $1,000 User Fee E-17 E-14 Low Impact Development (LID Report)
Single-Family / ADU Each $550 $774 $770 User Fee
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each Actual Cost $1,001 $1,000 User Fee Encroachment Permits
E-18 E-15 Temporary Placement on Street Permit Each $86 $331 $330 User Fee E-19 E-16 Temporary Encroachment Permit Each $86 $363 $360 User Fee E-20 E-17 Permanent Encroachment Permit Each $241 $772 $770 User Fee Plan Checks
E-18 Public Improvement Plan Check/ Inspection % of Constructio 5% 5% 5% User Fee $10,000 Each
$25,000 Each
$50,000 Each
$100,000 Each
$500,000 Each
E-22 E-19 Traffic Control Plan Review Each $350 $723 $720 User Fee E-23 E-20 Miscellaneous Plan Review
Single-Family / ADU Each $350 $774 $770 User Fee
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each Actual Cost $1,275 $1,275 User Fee E-24 E-21 Signing/ Striping Plan Check Each $307 $858 $855 User Fee E-25 E-22 SWPPP Review Fee
Less than 1 acre Each $350 $490 $490 User Fee
1 acre or more Each $550 $852 $850 User Fee
Single-Family / ADU Each
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each
E-26 E-23 Traffic Study Review Fee Each $550 $734 $730 User Fee E-27 E-24 Delta Revision Fee Each $307 $767 $765 User Fee E-28 E-25 Delta Revision to Drainage/ Grading Plans Each $350 $426 $425 User Fee E-29 E-26 Stock Pile Plan Review Fee Each Refer to Drainage/ Grading Chart $723 $720 User Fee E-30 E-27 Hydrology & Hydraulics Report Review Fee $307 Single-Family / ADU Each $550 $862 $860 User Fee
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee Drive Approach Permits
E-31 E-28 Residential Drive Approach Each $145 $513 $510 User Fee E-32 E-29 Commercial Drive Approach Each $300 $730 $730 User Fee Excavation Permits*
E-33 E-30 Natural Soil Excavation (sod/ earth) Each $145 $595 $595 User Fee E-34 E-31 Paved Surfaces:
1 – 50 square foot Each $145 $295 $295 User Fee
Deposit Each $150 $150 Deposit
51 – 300 square foot Each $300 $361 $361 User Fee
Deposit Each $1,000 $1,000 Deposit
301 – 600 square foot Each $450 $478 $478 User Fee
Deposit Per Sq. Ft $4 $4 Deposit
601 – 1,000 square foot Each $691 $693 $693 User Fee
Deposit Each $3,000 $3,000 Deposit
Over 1,000 square foot Each $691 $858 $858 User Fee
Each Addl. 100 sq. ft. over 1,000 Each Addl. 100 $25 $28 $28 User Fee Deposit Each $3,000 $3,000 Deposit
Each Addl. 100 sq. ft. over 1,000 Each Addl. 100 $1 $1 Deposit Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk & Paving Permits
E-35 E-32 Curb and/or Gutter
0 - 100 linear foot Each $145 $460 $460 User Fee
Over 100 linear foot Per L.F. $1.00 $1.33 $1.30 User Fee E-36 E-33 Sidewalk
0 - 100 sq. ft. Each $145 $595 $595 User Fee
Over 100 sq. ft. Per Sq. Ft. $1.00 $1.19 $1.10 User Fee E-37 E-34 Minor Curb Cut/ Drilling (Core) Per Curb locatio $145 $530 $530 User Fee E-38 E-35 Paving Each
Sewer Fees
E-39 E-36 Building Sewer Connection to Public Sewer Each $145 $766 $765 User Fee E-40 E-37 Sewer Front Footage Per Front Foot $6.50 $6.51 $6.51 User Fee E-41 E-38 Sewer Acreage Per Acre $730 $769 $765 User Fee E-42 E-39 Sewer Main Inspection Fee Per Liner Foot $1.00 $1.66 $1.60 User Fee E-43 E-40 Manhole, J unction Structure, etc. Inspection Each $71 $300 $300 User Fee E-44 E-41 Sewer Area Study Review Fee
Single-Family / ADU Each $550 $913 $910 User Fee
Multi-Family (more than 1) / Commercial Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee *Prior to permits being issued, final costs will be calculated and charged to the Applicant if they exceed deposit fees.
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Miscellaneous Fees
E-45 E-42 Pool Drainage Permit Each $73 $233 $230 User Fee E-46 E-43 Sign Impound Fee Each $100 $196 $195 User Fee E-47 Newsrack Registration (per rack) Each
E-48 E-44 Easement Quitclaim Deed Processing Each $445 $913 $910 User Fee E-49 E-45 Oversized Transportation Permit Each $16 $212 $210 User Fee E-50 E-46 Moving Building/House
Permit Fee Each $75 $179 $175 User Fee
Deposit Each $1,000 $1,000 Deposit
E-51 E-47
Hazardous Material Spill: Cleanup & Disposal Sewage Spill Cleanup Damage to City Property/ Repair Each Actual Cost $269 $265 User Fee E-52 E-48 Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Management Plan Administration Projects with a valuation less than $100,000:
City Approved Haul Each $0 $98 $95 User Fee
Self-Haul Each $80 $98 $95 User Fee
Projects with a valuation greater than $100,000:
City Approved Haul Each $80 $98 $95 User Fee
Self-Haul Each $160 $98 $95 User Fee
E-53 E-49 Preferential Parking District -Establishment or Modification Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee Miscellaneous Inspections
E-54 E-50 Inspections (after hours/ weekends) Per Hour Actual Cost $160 $160 User Fee E-55 E-51 Re-inspections Per Hour Actual Cost $134 $130 User Fee E-56 E-52 Inspection (no indicated fee) Per Hour Actual Cost $134 $130 User Fee E-57 E-53 3rd Party Consultants Per Hour Actual Cost $290 $290 User Fee Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (Public Right-of-Way) E-58 E-54
Administrative Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - Small Wireless Facilities
Flat Fee for Review (Includes First and Second Submittals) Each Deposit Each $1,650 $4,000 $4,000 Deposit
Additional Cost (Following exhaustion of Deposit) Each
E-59 E-55
Administrative Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - Eligible Facilities Request
Flat fee for review Each $450 $537 $535 Deposit
Additional Cost (Following exhaustion of Flat Fee) Each E-60 E-56
Major Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit Fees - NonAdministrative Flat Fee for Review (Includes Firstand Second Submittals) Each Deposit Each $1,650 $8,000 $8,000 Deposit
Additional Cost(Following exhaustion of Deposit) Each
*Prior to permits being issued, final costs will be calculated and charged to the Applicant if they exceed deposit fees.
GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN CHECK/ INSPECTION FEES GRADING PERMIT FEES E-57 51-1000 Cubic Yards
For First 50 Cubic Yards Each $677 $798 $795 User Fee
Each add'l 100 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof Each $154 $169 $165 User Fee E-58 1,001-10,000 Cubic Yards
For First 1,001 Cubic Yards Each $2,252 $2,406 $2,405 User Fee Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof Each $192 $193 $190 User Fee E-59 10,001-50,000 Cubic Yards
For First 10,001 Cubic Yards Each $4,057 $4,149 $4,145 User Fee Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof Each $270 $80 $80 User Fee E-60 50,001-100,000 Cubic Yards
For First 50,001 Cubic Yards Each $7,238 $7,365 $7,365 User Fee Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof Each $115 $112 $110 User Fee E-61 Over 100,000 Cubic Yards
For First 100,000 Cubic Yards Each $12,998 $12,988 $12,985 User Fee Each add'l 1000 Cubic Yards or Fraction Thereof Each $58 $56 $55 User Fee Surcharges
E-62 Technology % of Permit 13% 19% 19.0% Surcharge
POLICE
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Police
PD-1 Adult Business Entertainer Permit Per Application
PD-2 Adult Business License Per Application
Animal Control
PD-3 PD-1 Animal Control Services
Food & Care Each $10 $10 Pass Through
Cat Each $10 $10 Pass Through
Small Animal Each $5 $5 Pass Through
Medium Animal Each $10 $10 Pass Through
Large Animal Each $40 $40 Pass Through
Biter (OBS) Each $20 $20 Pass Through
PD-4 PD-2 Animal Impound
Dog 1st offense—altered Each $30 $30 Pass Through
Dog 1st offense—unaltered Each $50 $50 Pass Through
Dog 2nd offense—altered Each $70 $70 Pass Through
Dog 2nd offense—unaltered Each $100 $100 Pass Through
Dog 3rd offense—altered Each $120 $120 Pass Through
Dog 3rd offense—unaltered Each $120 $120 Pass Through
Cat—altered Each $5 $5 Pass Through
Cat—unaltered Each $5 $5 Pass Through
Small Animal Each $15 $15 Pass Through
Medium Animal Each $25 $25 Pass Through
Large Animal Each $60 $60 Pass Through
PD-5 PD-3 Animal License Issuance
Cat License Altered/ S/ C $5 Each $5 $5 Pass Through
Unaltered/ S/ C Each $10 $10 Pass Through
Penalty Each $10 $10 Pass Through
Dog License Unaltered Each $100 $100 Pass Through
Altered Each $30 $30 Pass Through
S/ C Unaltered Each $100 $100 Pass Through
S/ C Altered Each $10 $10 Pass Through
Veteran Disability Altered Each $0 $0 Pass Through
Penalty Each $50 $50 Pass Through
Potentially Dangerous Each $125 $125 Pass Through
PD-6 PD-4 Animal Retrieval/Disposal
Owner Released– licensed: Per Animal Per Animal $40 $40 Pass Through Per Litter Per Litter $30 $30 Pass Through
O/ R pickup live Each $30 $30 Pass Through
O/ R pickup dead Each $20 $20 Pass Through
Owner Released– unlicensed: Per Animal Per Animal $100 $100 Pass Through Per Litter Per Litter $100 $100 Pass Through
O/ R pickup live Each $100 $100 Pass Through
O/ R pickup dead Each $100 $100 Pass Through
Police Fees
PD-7 PD-5 Bicycle Licenses
New license Each $6 $8 $4 VEH § 39004
Renewal Each $3 $8 $2 VEH § 39004
PD-8 PD-6 Code Enforcement Investigation
Various Fines Each $50 - $1,500 $50 - $1,500
Re-investigation Each $100 $166 $100 User Fee
PD-9 PD-7 Cost Recovery of Graffiti Damage Caused by a Minor Each Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee PD-10 Disabled Placard Valid but Not Properly Displayed Each PD-11 PD-8 DUI Incident Response Investigation Each Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee PD-12 PD-9 Fingerprint Card First Card $20 $24 $20 User Fee Additional Fingerprint Card Each Additional $5 $6 $5 User Fee PD-13 PD-10 Impound Vehicle Release Per Vehicle $120 $161 $160 User Fee PD-14 PD-11
Inspection, documentation and registration of vacant property or property in foreclosure Each $200 $83 $80 User Fee
PD-15 PD-12 Massage Business Permit Per Application $350 $333 $330 User Fee PD-16 PD-13 Massage Business Permit Renewal Each $350 $166 $165 User Fee PD-17 PD-14 Massage Tech/ Practitioner Permit Per Application $297 $166 $165 User Fee PD-18 PD-15 Massage Tech/ Practitioner Permit Renewal Each $297 $83 $80 User Fee PD-19 PD-16 Massage Business Location Change Per Application $182 $166 $165 User Fee PD-20 PD-17 Massage Business Sale/ Transfer Per Application $350 $166 $165 User Fee PD-21 PD-18 Noise Disturbance Response Call-Back / Alcohol consumed by a Minor 1st Response Each $0 $0 Penalty
2nd Response Each $100 $100 Penalty
3rd Response Each $250 $250 Penalty
4th Response Each $500 $500 Penalty
5th Response Each $1,000 $1,000 Penalty
6th and subsequent Responses Each $2,500 $2,500 Penalty PD-23 PD-19 Parking Permit - Early Morning
Early Morning/ Per Day Per Day $5 $5 $5 User Fee
Early Morning/ Per Year Per Year $75 $83 $80 User Fee
PD-24 Police Computer Records Search Per Hour
PD-25 PD-20 Police Photo Reproduction Per Request $33 $37 $35 User Fee PD-26 PD-21 Police Report Copy
First Five (5) pages Each Free Free User Fee
Additional Pages After 5 Per Page $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 User Fee PD-27 PD-22 Police Special Services Each Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee PD-28 PD-23 Records Check/ Clearance Letter Per Letter $25 $42 $40 User Fee PD-29 Street Vendor Permit
New Per Application
Renewal Per Application
PD-30 PD-24 Vehicle Equipment Correction Inspection Per Inspection $25 $28 $25 User Fee PD-31 PD-25 Video/ Audio Disk Reproduction Per Disk $25 $37 $35 User Fee PD-32 PD-26 Weapons Storage Processing Per Weapon $50 $61 $60 User Fee PD-33 PD-27 Traffic Collision Report Per Report $20 $21 $20 User Fee PD-28 Sidewalk Vendor - Impounding Equipment & Merchandise Each $200 $208 $205 User Fee Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Alarm Fees
PD-34 PD-29 Alarm Permit
Residential Per Permit $40 $52 $40 User Fee
Commercial Per Permit $50 $52 $50 User Fee
PD-35 PD-30 False Alarm Fines
Permitted
1st Alarm Each $0 $137 $0 Penalty
2nd Alarm Each $75 $137 $75 Penalty
3rd Alarm Each $150 $137 $150 Penalty
4th Alarm Each $250 $137 $250 Penalty
5th Alarm Each $250 $137 $250 Penalty
Non-Permitted
1st Alarm Each $50 $137 $50 Penalty
2nd Alarm Each $175 $137 $175 Penalty
3rd Alarm Each $200 $137 $200 Penalty
4th Alarm Each $350 $137 $350 Penalty
5th Alarm Each $350 $137 $350 Penalty
PD-37 PD-31 Alarm Permit Late Registration Each $10 $10 Penalty PD-38 Alarm System Appeal Fee
Under 30 Minutes Each
Over 30 Minutes Each
PD-39 Alarm Fee Late Charge Each
PD-40 Alarm Permit Reinstatement Fee Each
PD-41 Automatic Dialing Fee Each
PD-42 Operating Suspended Alarm System Each
PD-43 Audible Alarm Violation Each
PD-44 Failure to Report New Install Each
PD-45 Failure to Report Disconnected Alarm Each
PD-46 False Alarm caused by Alarm company Each
PD-47 False statement by Alarm company Each
PD-38 PD-32 Alarm Fee Late Charge Each $25 $25 Penalty
PD-39 PD-33 Alarm Permit Reinstatement Fee Each $100 $100 Penalty Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW)
PD-48.1 PD-34.1 Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) -New Application Each $389 $1,450 $595 User Fee PD-48.2 PD-34.2 Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) -Amended Application Each $10 $434 $10 User Fee PD-48.3 PD-34.3 Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) -Live Scan Each $20 $24 $24 User Fee PD-48.4 PD-34.4 Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) -Renewal Each $129 $868 $495 User Fee Code Enforcement Violation
VEH-1 VEH-1 Prohibited parking on public grounds Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-2 VEH-2 No front license plate Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-3 VEH-3 Failure to display registration tab Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-4 VEH-4 Current year tab required Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-5 VEH-5 Parked within intersection Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-6 VEH-6 Parked on crosswalk Each $51 $51 Penalty
VEH-7 VEH-7 Parked in painted zone Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-8 VEH-8 Parked within 15 ft. of fire station Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-9 VEH-9 Parked on sidewalk Each $51 $51 Penalty
VEH-10 VEH-10 Parked at street excavation Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-11 VEH-11 Double parked Each $51 $51 Penalty
VEH-12 VEH-12 Parked in a bus zone Each $255 $255 Penalty VEH-13 VEH-13 Parked on bridge Each $51 $51 Penalty
VEH-14 VEH-14 Parked blocking disabled ramp Each $336 $336 Penalty VEH-15 VEH-15 Parked in fire lane Each $255 $255 Penalty VEH-16 VEH-16
Parked in excess of 18 inches of curb/
wrong side Each $51 $51 Penalty
VEH-17 VEH-17 Parked/ obstructing handicapped space Each $336 $336 Penalty VEH-18 VEH-18 Parked too close to fire hydrant Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-19 VEH-19 Parked without setting brake, stopping motor Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-20 VEH-20 Parked blocking access ramp Each $336 $336 Penalty Glendora Municipal Code (GMC) Parking Violations
VEH-21 VEH-21 Parked vehicle with for sale sign Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-22 VEH-22 Early morning parking prohibited Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-23 VEH-23 Failure to obey curb markings Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-24 VEH-24 Parking in excess of 72 hours Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-25 VEH-25 Parking on public property in violationof signs Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-26 VEH-26 Commercial Vehicle: Parked in residential area Each $86 $86 Penalty VEH-27 VEH-27 Commercial Vehicle: Parked in commercial area Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-28 VEH-28 Parking in violation of posted sign Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-29 VEH-29 Parked with sign advertising event Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-30 VEH-30 Preferential parking permit required Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-31 VEH-31 Selling from parked vehicle Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-31 VEH-31 Parked in violation of posted signs Each $51 $51 Penalty VEH-31 VEH-31 Late Penalty Each $45 $45 Penalty
PUBLIC WORKS
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Public Works
P-60 PW-1 Tree Planting
15-Gallon Each $180 $180 Material Costs
24' box Each $360 $360 Material Costs
36' box Each $1,000 $1,000 Material Costs
48' box Each $1,950 $1,950 Material Costs
60' box Each $5,950 $5,950 Material Costs
P-61 PW-2 Service Request Pruning Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Pass-Through P-62 PW-3 Tree Removal -Appeal to the Commission Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Pass-Through P-63 PW-4 Memorial Trees Each $310 $310 Pass-Through
P-64 PW-5 Tree Replacement Cost for Developers (In-Lieu Fund) Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Pass-Through
UTILITY FEES
Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type Utility Fees
UMT-1 UMT-1 Damage to City Property Repair Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee UMT-2 UMT-2 Service Reconnect Fees
Delinquent (Business hours, Customer receiving social assistance) Each $50 $107 $50 User Fee Delinquent (Outside of business hours, Customer receiving social assistance): Each $150 $297 $150 User Fee
Delinquent (Business Hours): Each $70 $107 $107 User Fee Delinquent (Outside of Business Hours): Each $150 $297 $295 User Fee Non-Delinquent (Business Hours): Each $77 $107 $105 User Fee Non-Delinquent (Outside of Business Hours): Each $112 $297 $295 User Fee Non-Delinquent (After midnight): Each $128 $297 $295 User Fee UMT-3 UMT-3 Hazardous Material Spill Cleanup and Disposal Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee UMT-4 UMT-4 Sewage Spill Cleanup Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee UMT-5 UMT-5 Street Light Maintenance Each
UMT-6 UMT-6 Temporary Water Meter Rental Service Each $29 $78 $75 Rental UMT-7 UMT-7 Water Bill Penalties Each 10% 10% Penalty
UMT-8 UMT-8 Water Conservation Violations
First Water Conservation Violation Each $0 $0 Penalty
Second Water Conservation Violation Each $150 $150 Penalty Third Water Conservation Violation Each $250 $250 Penalty Fourth Water Conservation Violation Each $1,000 $1,000 Penalty UMT-10 UMT-9 Water System Inspection
Lateral for ADU Per Inspection $935 $491 $490 User Fee
Convert private pipe to City Each
UMT-11 UMT-10 Integrated Waste Management Franchise Fee Each 11% 11% Franchise Fee UMT-11 UMT-11 Vehicle and Equipment Rental Rates Each
UMT-13 UMT-12 Manual Meter Read Fee Each $60 $234 $230 User Fee UMT-13 ACH Return Fee(incorrect bank information) Each $27 $57 $55 User Fee UMT-14 Chargeback Fee (Customer Disputed Bill Penalty) Each $35 $57 $55 User Fee UMT-15
New Account Application/ Activation Fee (Processing Fee, excluding meter installation) Each $77 $86 $85 User Fee
UMT-16 Deposits for Service Each $200 $200 $200 User Fee UMT-17 Door Hanger Fee Each $20 $48 $45 User Fee
UMT-18 Trip Charge for Additional Visit Each $76 $146 $145 User Fee UMT-19 Temporary Construction Meter Each $281 $292 $290 User Fee Water Service Installation Charges
Water Service Size - 1"
Flow (In GPM) 50
10 Feet Minimum Each
11 Feet to 20 Feet Each
21 Feet to 30 Feet* Each
Water Service Size - 2"
Flow (In GPM) 160
10 Feet Minimum Each
11 Feet to 20 Feet Each
21 Feet to 30 Feet* Each
¾”, 1”, 1 ½”, 2”
Labor Each
Service Truck Each
Water Service Installation
3/ 4-1" Deposit Modified $5,000 $5,000 Deposit
2" Deposit Modified $7,000 $7,000 Deposit
4" Deposit Modified $10,000 $10,000 Deposit
6" Deposit Modified $12,000 $12,000 Deposit
Miscellaneous Water Fees and Charges
Water Front Footage Per Foot $8 $8 Rates
Acreage Charges Per Acre $4,658.50 $4,658.50 Rates
Backflow Preventer Installation Each $152 $152 $150 User Fee Fire Hydrant Flow Test (office study performed with hydraulic model) Per Fire Hydrant $551 $871 $870 User Fee Fire Hydrant Flow Test (Field Test) Per Fire Hydrant $512 $728 $725 User Fee Fire Flow Availability Form Per Request $299 $409 $405 User Fee Fire Hydrant Inspections ( Private Hydrant Inspection) Per Fire Hydrant Fire Services / Protection (Fixed) Per Diameter In $9 $9 Rates Fire Hydrant Meter Deposit Deposit $1,851 $2,000 $2,000 Deposit Quitclaim of Water Easement Each
Irrigation Plan Review/ Water System Inspection (Non-Tract) Each $235 $196 $195 User Fee Fire Service Plan Review/ Water Service Installation Plan Review Each $310 $196 $195 User Fee Water Meter Test
¾” – 2” : Each $308 $234 $230 User Fee
Water Quality Testing Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee Bacterial Sample Test Each $517 $401 $400 User Fee
Pressure Test Each $296 $401 $400 User Fee
Hydrant Lock Fee (new lock with installation) Each $212 $287 $285 User Fee Hydrant- Handle replacement fee Each $79 $167 $165 User Fee Broken lock/ damage costs & service. Each $212 $217 $215 User Fee Bi-Monthly Meter Connection Charge*
5/ 8 & 3/ 4 Inch Each $87.93 $87.93 Rates
1 Inch Each $138.24 $138.24 Rates
1.5 Inch Each $264.76 $264.76 Rates
2 Inch Each $426.04 $426.04 Rates
3 Inch Each $1,013.74 $1,013.74 Rates
4 Inch Each $1,013.74 $1,013.74 Rates
6 Inch Each $2,225.21 $2,225.21 Rates
8 Inch Each $2,225.21 $2,225.21 Rates
Bi-Monthly Consumption Tiers (CCF)
5/8 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-12 0-12 Rates
Tier 2 Each 13-38 13-38 Rates
Tier 3 Each 39-76 39-76 Rates
Tier 4 Each >76 >76 Rates
3/4 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-12 0-12 Rates
Tier 2 Each 13-38 13-38 Rates
Tier 3 Each 39-76 39-76 Rates
Tier 4 Each >76 >76 Rates
1 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-18 0-18 Rates
Tier 2 Each 19-67 19-67 Rates
Tier 3 Each 68-134 68-134 Rates
Tier 4 Each >134 >134 Rates
*Shall be automatically increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from October to October for calendar years 2025 – 2028, not to exceed 5% each year. Extraordinary increases may be brought to Old Item
No.
New Item
No. Service Provided Unit Current Fee Total Cost Proposed Fee Fee Type
1.5 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-42 0-42 Rates
Tier 2 Each 43-134 43-134 Rates
Tier 3 Each 135-268 135-268 Rates
Tier 4 Each >268 >268 Rates
2 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-64 0-64 Rates
Tier 2 Each 65-220 65-220 Rates
Tier 3 Each 221-440 221-440 Rates
Tier 4 Each >440 >440 Rates
3 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-181 0-181 Rates
Tier 2 Each 182-419 182-419 Rates
Tier 3 Each 420-838 420-838 Rates
Tier 4 Each >838 >838 Rates
4 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-181 0-181 Rates
Tier 2 Each 182-658 182-658 Rates
Tier 3 Each 659-1316 659-1316 Rates
Tier 4 Each >1316 >1316 Rates
6 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-328 0-328 Rates
Tier 2 Each 329-2,341 329-2,341 Rates
Tier 3 Each 2,342-4,682 2,342-4,682 Rates
Tier 4 Each >4,682 >4,682 Rates
8 Inch
Tier 1 Each 0-328 0-328 Rates
Tier 2 Each 329-2,341 329-2,341 Rates
Tier 3 Each 2,342-4,682 2,342-4,682 Rates
Tier 4 Each >4,682 >4,682 Rates
Consumption Rates for Water & Elevations (CCF)*
Zone A
Tier 1 Each $1.80 $1.80 Rates
Tier 2 Each $2.76 $2.76 Rates
Tier 3 Each $3.72 $3.72 Rates
Tier 4 Each $4.68 $4.68 Rates
Elevation $0.23 $0.23 Rates
Zone B
Tier 1 Each $1.80 $1.80 Rates
Tier 2 Each $2.76 $2.76 Rates
Tier 3 Each $3.72 $3.72 Rates
Tier 4 Each $4.68 $4.68 Rates
Elevation $1.05 $1.05 Rates
Zone C
Tier 1 Each $1.80 $1.80 Rates
Tier 2 Each $2.76 $2.76 Rates
Tier 3 Each $3.72 $3.72 Rates
Tier 4 Each $4.68 $4.68 Rates
Elevation $2.12 $2.12 Rates
Zone D
Tier 1 Each $1.80 $1.80 Rates
Tier 2 Each $2.76 $2.76 Rates
Tier 3 Each $3.72 $3.72 Rates
Tier 4 Each $4.68 $4.68 Rates
Elevation $3.51 $3.51 Rates
*Shall be automatically increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from October to October for calendar years 2025 – 2028
USER FEE COST RECOVERY POLICY
SECTION or POLICY NO:
Policy No. <<XXXX>>
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Administrative Services –
Finance Division
Reference:
Administrative Policy
SUPERSEDES:
N/A
NEW EFFECTIVE DATE:
11/12/2025 PAGE 1 of 2
APPROVED BY:
CC approved resolution No XXXX-XX
Prepared by: Administrative Services – Finance Page 1 of 2 Policy Objective:
The purpose of this policy is to establish a consistent framework for developing, implementing, and maintaining user fees and charges for City services. This policy ensures that the City recovers the appropriate share of costs incurred in providing feebased services while promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness in fee-setting practices. It is intended to balance the City’s cost recovery objectives with broader community benefits and equity considerations, ensuring that fees are applied consistently and in compliance with all applicable State laws and regulations governing the establishment and adjustment of municipal fees.
Authority:
This policy is established under the authority of California Government Code Sections 66014 and 66016, which regulate the setting and modification of local government fees and charges.
Assigned Responsibility:
Finance Division: Responsible for administering this policy, coordinating cost-of-service studies, and maintaining documentation supporting adopted fees.
Department Directors: Responsible for identifying services subject to cost recovery, preparing accurate cost data, and recommending fee adjustments in coordination with the Finance Division.
City Manager’s Office: Provides oversight and policy direction, reviews departmental recommendations, and presents fee schedules to the City Council for consideration.
City Council: Has final authority to adopt, amend, or repeal fees and charges through resolution following applicable noticing and public hearing requirements.
Definitions:
Cost Recovery: The process of collecting fees and charges to offset the City’s cost of providing specific services.
User Fee Cost Recovery – effective 11/12/2025
Prepared by: Finance Page 2 of 2
User Fee: A fee charged to individuals or entities for the use of City services or facilities.
Full Cost: All direct and indirect costs associated with providing a service, including personnel, overhead, materials, and contractual services.
Subsidy: The portion of service cost not recovered through fees, supported instead by the General Fund or other funding sources.
Policy/Procedure:
1. Cost Recovery Goals
a. The City shall establish fees and charges with the objective of recovering the full cost of services provided, except where a subsidy is determined to serve the public interest.
b. Cost recovery levels may vary based on the nature of the service, legal or regulatory constraints, community benefit, and City Council direction. c. Departments shall identify cost recovery targets for major service categories, subject to approval by the City Manager and Finance Division. d. The City shall establish fees and charges with the objective of recovering the full cost of services provided, except where a subsidy is determined to serve the public interest.
2. Fee Studies and Updates
a. Comprehensive cost-of-service studies shall be conducted periodically (generally every three to five years) to evaluate fee levels and ensure they reflect the full cost of providing services.
b. Between comprehensive studies, fees may be updated annually based on inflationary indices or other Council-approved methodologies. c. Documentation supporting fee calculations shall be retained by the Finance Division and made available for public review upon request.
3. Council Adoption
a. All fees and charges established or revised under this policy shall be adopted by City Council resolution, in accordance with all noticing and public hearing requirements set forth in State law.
4. Periodic Review
a. Departments shall review fees annually and recommend adjustments, as appropriate, to maintain consistency with this policy and applicable legal requirements.
RESOLUTION CC 2025-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA
ADOPTING THE PROPOSED MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR SERVICE
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Glendora, California
WHEREAS, the City of Glendora engaged Matrix Consulting Group to conduct a comprehensive Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study to evaluate the full cost of providing City services; and,
WHEREAS, the purpose of the study is to ensure that user fees accurately reflect the cost of providing services, consistent with the City Council’s cost recovery policy and applicable provisions of the California Government Code; and, WHEREAS, the User Fee Study identifies the actual cost to provide fee-based services and recommends updated fees to ensure fairness, transparency, and fiscal sustainability; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66016, notice of a public hearing was duly given, and said public hearing was held on November 12, 2025, to receive and consider all evidence and reports related to the proposed Master Schedule of Fees for Service; and,
WHEREAS, after due consideration, the City Council finds that the User Fee Study is in the best interest of the City and will ensure that the City continues to provide services in a fiscally responsible and equitable manner.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the proposed Master Schedule of Fees for Service, as presented and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes staff to implement updated fees and charges for City services consistent with the adopted study, effective January 1, 2026.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter the same into the Book of Original Resolutions of the City of Glendora.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Glendora this ____ day of _________ 2025.
BY:
DAVID FREDENDALL
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Resolution (LB) YYYY-## Page 2 of 2
Template Version Update: 2025 08 18
DANNY ALESHIRE
City Attorney
CERTIFICATION
I, Kathleen R. Sessman, City Clerk/Communications Director, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Glendora at a regular meeting held on the __ day of _________________, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: MEMBERS:
NOES: MEMBERS:
ABSENT: MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:
Dated:
KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN
City Clerk/Communications Director
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL
YOU MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Glendora will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, California, on November 12, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. to receive and consider all evidence and reports relative to a resolution amending the City of Glendora Master Fee Schedule of fees and charges for City Services to receive and consider all evidence and reports relative to a resolution adopting the City of Glendora Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study, and updating fees and charges for City services accordingly.
All interested parties are invited to attend said hearing and express their views on this matter.
Should you be unable to attend the public hearing, your testimony must be made in writing and delivered prior to the scheduled hearing date as follows: City Clerk Department, 116 E. Foothill Blvd, Glendora, CA, 91741, [email protected].
Further information on this item will be posted to the city’s website at CityofGlendora.org/citymeetings and will be on file for public inspection and copying for the cost of duplication, at the office of the City Clerk, 116 E. Foothill Blvd, Glendora, CA, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays, within those hours for agenda posting and public inspection as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code 54950 et seq. as applicable to this meeting.
If you challenge this action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk
Published San Gabriel Valley Examiner: 10/27/2025
11/6/2025
CERTIFICATION
I, Kathleen R. Sessman, City Clerk of the City of Glendora, hereby certify that I posted a copy of this Notice on the bulletin board outside the City Hall Council Chamber, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard at 2:00 p.m. on 10/23/2025.
Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk
San Gabriel Valley Examiner
709 E. Route 66 Ste. A
Glendora, CA 91740
626-852-3374
City of Glendora
Attn: City Clerk
116 E. Foothill Blvd.
Glendora, CA 91741
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(201 5.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Los Angeles
I am a citizen of the United States. I am over
the age of eighteen years. I am not a party to
the above-entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk of the Publisher of the San Gabriel Valley
Examiner, an adjudicated newspaper of
general circulation printed and published
weekly in the City of Glendora, County of Los
Angeles. The San Gabriel Valley Examiner has
been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation by the Superior Court of the County
of Los Angeles, State of California, under the
date of July 19, 1999, case Number KS
005341. The notice, of which the annexed is a
true printed copy, has been published in each
regular and entitled issue of said newspaper
and not any supplement thereof on the following
dates to wit:
November 6, 2025
I declare under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed in the City of Glendora, Los Angeles
County, California
On this 6th day of November 2025.
Signature
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL
YOU MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Glendora will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, California, on November 12, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. to receive and consider all evidence and reports relative to a resolution amending the City of Glendora Master Fee Schedule of fees and charges for City Services to receive and consider all evidence and reports relative to a resolution adopting the City of Glendora Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study, and updating fees and charges for City services accordingly.
All interested parties are invited to attend said hearing and express their views on this matter. Should you be unable to attend the public hearing, your testimony must be made in writing and delivered prior to the scheduled hearing date as follows: City Clerk Department, 116 E. Foothill Blvd, Glendora, CA, 91741, [email protected].
Further information on this item will be posted to the city’s website at CityofGlendora.org/citymeetings and will be on file for public inspection and copying for the cost of duplication, at the office of the City Clerk, 116 E. Foothill Blvd, Glendora, CA, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays, within those hours for agenda posting and public inspection as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code 54950 et seq. as applicable to this meeting.
If you challenge this action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
Publish in the San Gabriel Valley Examiner on November 6, 2025. #GK02
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: November 12, 2025
FROM: Community Development DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to conduct the Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2097 adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Codes
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Adopt on second reading Ordinance 2097 entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2025 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; AND CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; INCLUDING SELECTED APPENDICES THERETO;" by reading of the title only and waiving further reading; and
2. Direct the preparation of a summary of ordinance for publication pursuant to Govt. Code 36933 and Resolution CC 2018-40.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Not Applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Every three years, the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) adopts and publishes a new edition of the codes that govern the design and construction of buildings, associated facilities, and equipment throughout the state. Local jurisdictions are required by state law to enforce these codes.
The 2025 California Building Standards Codes were published on July 1, 2025, and will become effective January 1, 2026.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
On October 28, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 2097, adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Codes.
DISCUSSION
The California Building Standards Code (Title 24) establishes the minimum state regulations for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings and related systems. These standards, defined in the California Health and Safety Code, apply uniformly to all building occupancies throughout the state and are published by the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) every three years.
Cities and counties are required by state law to enforce Title 24 within their jurisdictions. The 2025 editions of these codes take effect January 1, 2026.
The 2025 updates advance statewide goals for energy efficiency, electrification, and wildfire resilience. Major changes include stronger electric-ready requirements in the Energy Code; new electric-vehicle charging and Automatic Load Management System provisions in the CALGreen Code; improved coordination of photovoltaic and battery-energy-storage standards; and the introduction of a new, stand-alone Wildland-Urban Interface Code consolidating wildfire-resilience and access standards.
California Assembly Bill 130 (2025) temporarily restricts local jurisdictions from adopting or enforcing building standards for residential occupancies that are more restrictive than those contained in the California Building Standards Code, between October 1, 2025 and June 1, 2031, except where necessary to address an imminent threat to health or safety or as otherwise permitted by State law. This ordinance adopts the 2025 California Building Standards Codes consistent with those requirements.
This item returns following the first reading and introduction of the ordinance at the City Council meeting on October 28, 2025. Adoption of codes by reference must follow the procedures in Government Code Section 50022.1 et seq., including specific public notice and hearing requirements. This meeting serves as the second reading, public hearing, and proposed adoption. The required notices were published at least five days apart in advance of this meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed Ordinance and its various amendments to certain City code provisions is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Cal. Code Regs. Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3).
Prepared By: David Collett, Building Official
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Jeff Kugel, Community Development Director Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_ORDINANCE.pdf
B_PowerPoint.pdf
C_Summary_of_Ordinance_-_Public_Notice.pdf
Ordinance No. 2097 Page 1 of 5
ORDINANCE NO. 2097
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE 2025 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; CALIFORNIA
BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE;
CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA
MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA
WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL
CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN
BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA REFERENCED
STANDARDS CODE; AND CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; INCLUDING
SELECTED APPENDICES THERETO
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Glendora, California
WHEREAS, California law requires that on January 1, 2026, all portions of the 2025 California Code of Regulations Title 24 must be effective within the City of Glendora; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code §§ 50022.1 et seq., the City of Glendora is authorized to enact an ordinance which adopts any code by reference; and WHEREAS, the California Building Standards Commission has adopted the triennial editions of the model codes (the “Codes”); and WHEREAS, the City of Glendora has previously adopted the “Codes” and seeks to adopt the most recent versions of the “Codes”; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the adoption of local amendments to effectuate amendments to the Codes is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 18.04.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Fire Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 18.04.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Fire Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 9), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 International Fire Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Code Council, Inc.; and said Code, including Appendix Chapters 4, B, BB, C, CC, and H, is adopted in total as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.” Ordinance No. 2097 Page 2 of 5
SECTION 2: Section 19.01.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Administrative Code” is hereby added and adopted as follows:
“Section 19.01.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Administrative Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 1). One copy of said Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 3. Section 19.02.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Building Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.02.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Building Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 2), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 International Building Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Code Council, Inc.; and said Code, including Appendix Chapters H, I, and J, is adopted in total as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.” SECTION 4. Section 19.03.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Existing Building Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.03.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Existing Building Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 10), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 International Existing Building Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Code Council, Inc.; and said Code, including Appendix Chapters A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5, is adopted as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 5. Section 19.04.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Mechanical Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.04.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Mechanical Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 4), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 Uniform Mechanical Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials; and said Code is adopted as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.” SECTION 6. Section 19.05.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Historical Building Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
Ordinance No. 2097 Page 3 of 5
“Section 19.05.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Historical Building Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 8), which contains regulations of the State Historical Building Safety Board. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 7. Section 19.07.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Wildland-Urban Interface Code” is hereby added and adopted as follows:
“Section 19.07.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 7), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Code Council, Inc.; and said Code is adopted as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 8. Section 19.08.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Plumbing Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows):
“Section 19.08.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Plumbing Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 5), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 Uniform Plumbing Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials; and said Code, including Appendix Chapters A, B, D, H, I, and J, is adopted as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 9. Section 19.12.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Electrical Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.12.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Electrical Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 3), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2023 National Electrical Code, a copyrighted work owned by the National Fire Protection Association; and said Code is adopted in total as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 10: Section 19.13.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Residential Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.13.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Residential Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 2.5), which contains substantial copyrighted material from the 2024 International Ordinance No. 2097 Page 4 of 5
Residential Code, a copyrighted work owned by the International Code Council, Inc.; and said Code, including Appendix Chapters BF, BH, and CI, is adopted in total as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.” SECTION 11: Section 19.14.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Referenced Standards Code” is hereby added and adopted as follows:
“Section 19.14.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Referenced Standards Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 12). One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.”
SECTION 12. Section 19.15.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Green Building Standards Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.15.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Green Building Standards Code, 2025 Edition (Title24, Part 11); and said Code is adopted in total as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.” SECTION 13. Section 19.17.010 of the Glendora Municipal Code “California Energy Code” is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
“Section 19.17.010 Adopted by reference. The City adopts by reference the California Energy Code, 2025 Edition (Title 24, Part 6); and said Code is adopted in total as the law of the City. One copy of the Code has been, and is now, filed in the office of the Building Official, and the Code is adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out in full in this Chapter.” SECTION 14. Unless superseded or expressly repealed, references in City forms, documents and regulations to the titles, chapters, and sections of the City of Glendora Municipal Code, Title 18 and 19, shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions contained within the 2025 edited changes to Title 18 and 19 of the Glendora Municipal Code. City of Glendora Ordinance No. 2074 and all other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby superseded and expressly repealed; otherwise, except as specifically amended by this Ordinance, all other provisions of Title 18 and 19 of the Glendora Municipal Code shall remain unchanged.
SECTION 15. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The City Council of the City of Glendora hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, Ordinance No. 2097 Page 5 of 5
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.
SECTION 16. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof and cause same to be published at least once in the San Gabriel Valley Examiner, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Glendora, which newspaper is hereby designated for that purpose (Government Code § 40806); and thereupon, and thirty (30) days after its passage, this Ordinance shall take effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Glendora this ___ day of November, 2025.
BY: _______________________________
DAVID FREDENDALL
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
DANNY ALESHIRE
City Attorney
CERTIFICATION
I, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading on the 28th day of October, 2025. Thereafter, said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of ______, 20__, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MEMBERS: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos and Fredendall.
NOES: MEMBERS: None.
ABSENT: MEMBERS: None.
ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: None.
I further certify that pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c)(l), a summary of said Ordinance was published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Glendora, California on the 6
th day of November, 2025, and 20th day of
November, 2012.
Dated:
KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN
City Clerk/Communications Director
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE
ADOPTING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
STANDARDS CODES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 12, 2025
DAVID COLLETT, BUILDING OFFICIAL
SUMMARY
• Every three years, the California Building Standards
Commission adopts and publishes a new edition of the codes that govern the design and construction of buildings,
associated facilities, and equipment throughout the state. • Local jurisdictions are required by state law to enforce these codes.
• The new building codes become effective January 2026.
UPDATES
• The 2025 updates advance statewide goals for energy efficiency, electrification, and wildfire resilience.
Updates include:
• Stronger electric-ready requirements in the Energy Code • New electric-vehicle charging and Automatic Load Management System provisions in the CALGreen Code
• Improved coordination of photovoltaic and battery-energystorage standards • Introduction of a new, stand-alone Wildland-Urban Interface Code consolidating wildfire-resilience and access standards.
CA AB 130
California Assembly Bill 130 (2025)
• Temporarily restricts local jurisdictions from adopting or enforcing building standards for residential occupancies that are more restrictive than those contained in the California Building Standards Code, between October 1, 2025 and June 1, 2031, except where necessary to address an imminent threat to health or safety or as otherwise permitted by State law.
• This ordinance adopts the 2025 California Building Standards Codes consistent with those requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Adopt on second reading an Ordinance entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2025 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA
RESIDENTIAL CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; AND CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; INCLUDING SELECTED APPENDICES THERETO,” by reading of the title only and waiving further reading; and,
2. Direct the preparation of a summary of ordinance for publication pursuant to Govt. Code 36933 and Resolution CC 2018-40.
PUBLIC NOTICE
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE
(AS PRESCRIBED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 36933 (c) (1)) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT at their meeting held October 28, 2025, the Glendora City Council introduced for first reading, proposed Ordinance No. 2097, which if approved, will amend the following sections of Glendora Municipal Code:
Section 18.04.010, California Fire Code; Section 19.01.010, California Administrative Code; Section 19.02.010, California Building Code; Section 19.03.010, California Existing Building Code; Section 19.04.010, California Mechanical Code; Section 19.05.010, California Historical Building Code; Section 19.07.010, California Wildland-Urban Interface Code; Section 19.08.010, California Plumbing Code; Section 19.12.010, California Electrical Code; Section 19.13.010, California Residential Code; Section 19.14.010, California Referenced Standards Code; Section
19.15.010, California Green Building Standards Code; Section 19.17.010, California Energy Code.
The Ordinance enacts the following regulations and policies:
Adopt by reference, the 2025 editions of the California Fire Code; California Administrative Code; California Building Code; California Existing Building Code; California Mechanical Code; California Historical Building Code; California WildlandUrban Interface Code; California Plumbing Code; California Electrical Code; California Residential Code; California Referenced Standards Code; California Green Building Standards Code; and California Energy Code; including selected appendices thereto.
The City Council will consider adoption of said Ordinance at their meeting to be held November 12, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora.
A full text copy of the ordinance may be reviewed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Glendora at Glendora City Hall, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, California, and online at www.cityofglendora.gov under public notices.
Said Ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption.
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading at a Regular Meeting of the Glendora City Council by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MEMBERS: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos and Fredendall.
NOES: MEMBERS: None.
ABSENT: MEMBERS: None.
Dated this 30th day of October, 2025.
Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk
Published in San Gabriel Valley Examiner: November 6, 2025
PUBLIC NOTICE
SUMMARY OF APPROVED ORDINANCE
AS PRESCRIBED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 36933 (c) (1)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT at their meeting held November 12, 2025, the Glendora City Council conducted a second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 2097, which amends several sections of Glendora Municipal Code:
Section 18.04.010, California Fire Code; Section 19.01.010, California Administrative Code; Section 19.02.010, California Building Code; Section 19.03.010, California Existing Building Code; Section 19.04.010, California Mechanical Code; Section 19.05.010, California Historical Building Code; Section 19.07.010, California Wildland-Urban Interface Code; Section 19.08.010, California Plumbing Code; Section 19.12.010, California Electrical Code; Section 19.13.010, California Residential Code; Section 19.14.010, California Referenced Standards Code; Section
19.15.010, California Green Building Standards Code; Section 19.17.010, California Energy Code.
The ordinance enacts the following regulations and policies:
Adopt by reference, the 2025 editions of the California Fire Code; California Administrative Code; California Building Code; California Existing Building Code; California Mechanical Code; California Historical Building Code; California WildlandUrban Interface Code; California Plumbing Code; California Electrical Code; California Residential Code; California Referenced Standards Code; California Green Building Standards Code; and California Energy Code; including selected appendices thereto.
Said ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption.
A full text copy of the ordinance may be reviewed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Glendora at Glendora City Hall, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, California, and online at www.cityofglendora.gov under public notices.
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the Glendora City Council by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MEMBERS:
NOES: MEMBERS:
ABSENT: MEMBERS:
Dated this ______ day of November, 2025.
Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk
Published in San Gabriel Valley Examiner: November 20, 2025
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: November 12, 2025
FROM: City Clerk DISTRICT(S): Not Applicable
SUBJECT: Affirm minutes from the October 28, 2025 Meeting
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority:
1. Affirm minutes as presented.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Not Applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This staff report requests affirmation of the minutes from the previous meetings. The minutes have been prepared and reviewed in accordance with city procedures and transparency requirements. Affirming these minutes ensures the accuracy and integrity of the official record. Staff recomends approval to maintain proper documentation and compliance with meeting protocols.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
Pursuant to the City's standard practices and the Brown Act, meeting action minutes are reviewed and affirmed by the legislative bodies to ensure transparency and accuracy in government procceedings. The action minuts for the October 28, 2025 meeting was compiled based on staff notes and official recordings. No requests for revisions or amendments have been received to date.
By affirming minutes, the legislative bodies acknowledge their accuracy and preserve them as an official record of the meeting. If any corrections or amendments are desired, they can be addressed before the final affirmation.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There are no environmental impacts associated with this action.
Prepared By: Roxanne Breceda, Deputy City Clerk / Records Manager Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Kathleen Sessman, City Clerk/Communications Director Certified to Availability of Funds: Not Applicable
Approved By: Not Applicable
Legal Review: Not Applicable
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_October_28_2025_Reg_Mtg_Minutes.pdf
City of Glendora Minutes
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
City Hall Council Chamber
116 E. Foothill Boulevard
Virtually via Zoom ID# 9329247224
The City Council also serves as members of the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the former Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, which are concurrently convening this evening.
CALL TO ORDER
The City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Karen Davis, Shaunna Elias, Mendell L. Thompson, Mayor Pro Tem/ViceChair Michael Allawos, Mayor/Chair David Fredendall Members Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager/Executive Director Adam Raymond, City/Agency Attorney Danny Aleshire, Assistant City Manager Moises Lopez (via Zoom), Deputy City Manager Marie Ricci, Chief of Police Mike Randazzo, Public Works Director William Wittkopf, Finance Director/City Treasurer Kyle Johnson, City Clerk/Communications Director Kathleen Sessman, Assistant Public Works Director Valerie Velasquez-Santoya, Building Official David Collett, Principal Planner Hans Friedel, Senior Planner Yalini Siva, Police Captain Chris Stabio, Police Lieutenant Matt Fenner, Business Services Manager Julie Linger, Media Specialist Craig Gill, Senior Media Specialist Greg Morton, and Deputy City Clerk/Records Manager Roxanne Breceda
CLOSED SESSION
Closed Session titles were read into the record.
Mayor Fredendall announced that an item arose after the posting of the agenda that required immediate City Council action regarding real property located at 1134 S. Barranca Avenue that requires a 4/5 vote to add to the agenda and requested a motion.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos, seconded by Councilmember Thompson, that the City Council add an Urgency Item entitled, “CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8, to enable the City Council to consider negotiations with Glendora Unified School District, with whom City is negotiating and to give direction to its negotiator(s) Adam Raymond, Danny Aleshire, Jeff Kugel, and Moises Lopez regarding certain real properties in Glendora generally located at 1134 S. Barranca Avenue, APN 8632-001-900. The City’s real property negotiators will seek direction from the City Council regarding this property.” Motion carried 5-0 as follows:
AYSE: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
There was no one wishing to provide comment. The meeting convened into Closed Session at 6:07 PM.
Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 2 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority
1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR A closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code §54957.6 to conduct labor negotiations with the City Manager Adam Raymond, City Attorney Danny Aleshire, Assistant City Manager Moises Lopez, Deputy City Manager Marie Ricci, and Finance Director Kyle Johnson. Employee Organization:
Glendora Management Association (GMA).
Closed Session adjourned at 6:45 PM and the meeting reconvened into Open Session at 7:00 PM with all members present. City Attorney Aleshire reported confidential briefings were held on both Closed Session items, direction was given, and no reportable actions were taken.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Invocation was given by Pastor Dr. Michael Cordich of First Baptist Church.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Iris Cuevas.
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT REPORTS
2. High School Student Reports
Student reports were presented by Charter Oak Student Representative Iris Cuevas, Saint Lucy’s Student Representative Julianna Santiago and Arianna Terrazas.
REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no requests received.
PUBLIC COMMENT
3. Public Comments received
Mayor Fredendall read the following statement into the records relating to Independent Cities Association (ICA) Amicus Brief Statement:
“Before we open this evening’s Public Comment Period I want to report out and share about a recent action taken on behalf of the City that has become news fodder in social media circles, and I believe needs sharing and clarification as the fueled bonfire has once again made many distractions.
As most of us are aware, The City extends itself beyond our own agency to regional committees, commissions and associations that collaborate to help serve the City in many areas. These inclusions and memberships are made to enhance, improve and expand our voice and presence in the region and the state to advance causes to better promote and position Glendora to receive and provide better service to our residents, than we might be able to do alone.
Participation in these entities is through appointed, elected or volunteered delegates made up of Councilmembers and or Staff. Said delegate becomes the representative on behalf of the City.
One of these associations is Independent Cities Association, an entity made up of 40+ member Cities with the mission being to Network, educate, collaborate and advance the member cities positions toward voice, local controls and address issues of mutual importance related to matters pressed upon us by higher levels of government. I Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 3 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority represent this City at this Association and am presently serving on the Exec. Board of Directors as Vice President.”
Comments were received from: Bob Moore and Wendy Seyfert.
MEMBER STATEMENT/REPORTS
Councilmember/Commissioner Thompson thanked Mayor Fredendall for the ICA statement.
Councilmember/Commissioner Davis highlighted the City’s Halloween Carnival; announced the Halloween Walk taking place Friday, October 31, 2025; reminded the community about Dalton Trail Day and the Glendora Historical Society’s “Family Ties” event on Saturday, November 1, 2025; and noted the Glendora Community Coordinating Council’s holiday basket program.
Councilmember/Commissioner Elias commented on recent social media activity regarding the ICA; recognized Red Ribbon Week and thanked local officers and cadets for their participation; acknowledged the Glendora High School Girls Flag Football Team; and requested a brief overview of the City’s public noticing requirements for public meetings.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice-Chair Allawos congratulated Aleshire & Wynder on their ICA briefing; reported on the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments; and addressed topics including smart streetlight technology and Athens Services’ bulk pickup program, encouraging residents to contact Athens or the City with any service-related concerns.
Mayor/Chair Fredendall announced Dalton Trail Day on Saturday, November 1, 2025; reported that there have been no recent transient-related incidents; and reminded the community to use caution and be safe while trick-or-treating.
CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY STATEMENTS
There were no statements or reports given.
SPECIAL ITEMS
4. A Proclamation proclaiming October 23-31, 2025 as Red Ribbon Week Proclamation presented to School Resource Officers Albert Argueta and Crystal Goins.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. Public Hearing to consider adopting an Ordinance Amending Title 21 (Zoning) of the Glendora Municipal Code to Establish Objective Design Standards and Streamline Existing Regulations in Alignment with the City’s Adopted Housing Element and State Law
Item title was read into the record, and the Public Hearing was opened.
A staff presentation was made. Public Testimony period was opened. There being no one wishing to provide testimony, the Public Testimony period and Public Hearing were closed.
City Council discussion included architectural styles; state law requirements for housing developments; building code amenities; height variation; side-yard architecture; electric vehicle (EV) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking regulations; and reference to the user guide.
Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 4 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority A motion was made by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Councilmember Thompson, that the City Council 1. Find and determine that the Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2. Introduce for first reading Ordinance 2095 entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING TITLE 21 (ZONING) OF THE
GLENDORA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
AND STREAMLINE EXISTING REGULATIONS IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT AND STATE LAW (File # PLN22-0042);” and 3. Direct the preparation of a summary of introduced Ordinance for publication pursuant to Govt. Code 36933 and Resolution CC 2018-40. Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
6. Public Hearing to consider a Resolution adopting an Update to the General Plan Safety Element (PLN22-0043)
Item title was read into the record, and the Public Hearing was opened.
A staff presentation was made by Principal Planner Hans Friedel, who announced for the record that Appendix Attachment B had been inadvertently omitted from the agenda item and was now attached and available for public review. The Public Testimony period was opened.
Correspondence was received from the Glendora Citizens group. There being no one wishing to provide oral testimony, the Public Testimony period and Public Hearing were closed.
City Council discussion included information on texting 67283 for emergency alerts and texting “Glendora” for City updates; the Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map; Housing Element zoning and related State requirements; identification of community hazards, map boundaries, and evacuation sites; Emergency Operations Center (EOC) exercises, shelter areas, and regional shelters; Fire Hazard Policy F-22; disaster service response; and CEQA requirements regarding the availability and adequacy of Los Angeles County services.
Following discussion, a motion was made by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Councilmember Thompson, that the City Council 1. Find and determine that the Safety Element update is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2. Adopt Resolution CC 2025-37 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT TO ADOPT THE AMENDED SAFETY ELEMENT, INCORPORATING THE
MOST RECENT FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, AND FINDING THE PROJECT
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).” Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
7. Public Hearing for Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan Review for a 3-story, 24- unit residential development at 363 W. Route 66 (Project File No. PLN24-0051; Applicant: The Olson Company; Property Owner: Anthony Verlingo) Item title was read into the record, and the Public Hearing was opened.
A staff presentation was made. An applicant presentation was given by Brian Cunningham, Director of Development for The Olson Company.
Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 5 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority The Public Testimony period was opened. Public Testimony was received from: Harrison Smalley. The Public Testimony period and Public Hearing were closed.
Closing comments were provided by Brian Cunningham, Director of Development for The Olson Company.
City Council discussion included locating bedrooms with bathrooms on the first floor; clarification of public testimony regarding homelessness and crime trends as noted in the Los Angeles County report; art requirements for the community gates; unit cost considerations; management and income verification for the 55-year affordability covenant; Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) related to parking enforcement; no overnight street parking condition; Homeowners Association (HOA) oversight of garage use and authority to inspect garages; placement of mechanical equipment and architectural design details; parking concerns; roof edge treatment; concerns with front setbacks and parking; and clarification of the procedural constraints surrounding any consideration of project denial.
Following discussion, a motion was made by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Councilmember Thompson, that the City Council 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the project; and 2. Adopt Resolution CC 2025-38 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (NO. 84726) AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND TO CONSTRUCT TWENTY-FOUR (24) RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 363 WEST ROUTE 66, GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA (APN #8639- 020-003) (FILE NO. PLN24-0051).” Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Thompson commented on Item #11, and Mayor Pro Tem Allawos requested clarification on Item #12.
A motion was made by Councilmember/Commissioner Davis, seconded by Councilmember/Commissioner Thompson to approved Consent Calendar Items #8 - #12 as presented, affirming the actions appropriate to each item. Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES:
Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
8. Affirm minutes from the October 14, 2025 Meeting
The City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority affirmed minutes as presented.
9. City of Glendora and Glendora Successor Agency Investment Report for September 2025 The City Council and Successor Agency receive and filed the Monthly Investment Activity Report for September 2025.
10. Accept the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant PT26120 award and authorize an increase in estimated revenues in the amount of $120,000 and appropriate expenditures in the same amount to the OTS Account #28250940
Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 6 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority The City Council 1. Accepted the Office of Traffic Safety STEP Grant PT26120 award; and 2.
Authorized an increase in estimated revenues and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $120,000 in the OTS STEP Grant Fund 282.
11. Approve the Agreement with Miracle Playground Sales for Shade Structure for Gladstone Park in an amount not to exceed $186,141
The City Council 1. Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the project; 2. Approved an Agreement with Miracle Playground Sales for Gladstone Park Shade Structure and Picnic Site Installation in the amount of $186,141; and 3.
Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement with Miracle Playground Sales including minimal and/or non-substantive changes.
12. Authorize the Purchase of Ten Workstations and Related Furniture The City Council 1. Authorize the Purchase of Ten Workstations and Related Furniture from Government & Business Interiors, LLC in an amount not to exceed $85,000; and 2. Approve a supplemental appropriation in FY 2025-27 Adopted Two-Year Budget in the amount of $85,000 split $42,500 from Capital Project Fund (Fund 301) and $42,500 from Water Capital Project Fund (Fund 502).
NEW BUSINESS
13. Award a five-year (5) Professional Service Agreement to Axon Enterprise, Inc. to consolidate current body worn camera, fleet camera, and interview camera agreements, and include the upgrade of several current products, the purchase of new taser devices, and replacement of body worn cameras and fleet cameras for an amount not to exceed $1,397,498.67
Following discussion, a motion was made by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos, that the City Council 1. Award a Master Services and Purchasing Agreement with Axon Enterprise, Inc. (Axon) in an amount not to exceed $1,397,498.67 over a five (5) year period; 2.
Authorize the Police Chief to execute any necessary contingency in an amount not to exceed 5% of the original contract amount; 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement; and 4.
Approve supplemental appropriations in the amount of $100,000 in Asset Forfeiture (Fund 281) and $77,000 in Community Oriented Policing Services (Fund 275) in the FY2025-27 Adopted Two-Year Budget. Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
Mayor Fredendall requested a motion to extend the meeting past the 10:30 PM curfew. A motion was made by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos. There being no objections, the meeting continued.
14. Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Approving the 2025 City-Wide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys and Declaring Speed Limits Following discussion, a motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos, seconded by Councilmember Thompson, that the City Council 1. Introduce for first reading Ordinance 2096 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC
SURVEY AND AMENDING THE GLENDORA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DETERMINE AND Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 7 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority DECLARE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS;" and 2. Direct staff to prepare a Summary Ordinance for Publication. Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
15. Capital Improvement Update
A motion was made by Councilmember Thompson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos, that the City Council 1. Receive and file the FY 2025/26 Capital Improvement Program Update.
Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES:
None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
16. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Codes
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos, seconded by Councilmember Davis, that the City Council 1. Introduce for first reading Ordinance 2097 entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2025 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; AND CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; INCLUDING SELECTED APPENDICES THERETO;" and 2. Direct the preparation of a summary of ordinance for publication pursuant to Govt. Code 36933 and Resolution CC 2018-40. Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
17. Consider Approval of City Attorney Rate Increases and an Amendment to the City Attorney Contract
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Allawos, seconded by Councilmember Thompson, that the City Council 1. Authorize an increase in some of the hourly billing rates for the City Attorney’s Office; 2. Approve an Amendment to the Contract Services Agreement for City Attorney Services, dated March 13, 2018; and 3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment to the Contract Services Agreement. Motion carried 5-0 as follows: AYES: Davis, Elias, Thompson, Allawos, Fredendall; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None.
MEMBER/STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS
Councilmember/Commissioner Elias congratulated the Glendora High School Girls Flag Football team for their 19–0 victory and upcoming semifinal game this weekend.
Councilmembers wished everyone a safe and happy Halloween
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 10:52 PM.
Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
Minutes Tuesday, October 28, 2025 Page 8 of 8
Regular Meeting City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority Minutes were approved on _________________.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: November 12, 2025
FROM: Finance DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Review and Affirm Disbursements for October 2025 in the Amount of $5,841,894.18
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council and Successor Agency:
1. Review and affirm disbursements for October 2025 in the amount of $5,841,894.18.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 2: Maintain Financial Stability and Sustainability (MFSS)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For October 2025 the City disbursed the following amounts through accounts payable and payroll.
Month A/P Payroll Total
October
2025
$3,540,895.73 $3,540,895.73
10/03/2025 $758,473.93 $758,473.93
10/17/2025 $745,237.23 $745,237.23
10/31/2025 $797,287.29 $797,287.29
Total $3,540,895.73 $2,300,998.45 $5,841,894.18
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Pursuant to the Glendora Municipal Code Section 2.20.030 Departmental Reports, the Finance Department shall provide a comprehensive report on disbursements, at least on a quarterly basis.
DISCUSSION
Notable disbursements in the month of October include:
Name Amount Description
IDS Group Inc. $252,650.00 Glendora Corp. Yard Improvements Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. $235,142.75 Citywide Landscape Maintenance Southern California Edison $215,061.02 Citywide Electric Utility Tyler Technologies Inc. $203,717.31 ERP & EPL Updates & Budget Book Implementation West Coast Arborists, Inc. $176,653.08 Citywide Tree Trimming and Maintenance County of Los Angeles $129,487.01 Citywide Traffic Signal Repairs, Maintenance & Upgrades Azusa Light & Water $101,424.67 Electric and Pumping Charges
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact associated with the recommendation of this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There is no CEQA impact associated with the recommendations in this report.
Prepared By: George Perez-Sosa, Accounting Technician
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Not Applicable
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_Warrant_Register_-_October_2025.pdf
CITY OF GLENDORA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 11/12/2025
WARRANT REGISTER - OCTOBER 2025 $3,540,895.73
PAYROLL EFT 10/3/2025 758,473.93 $
10/17/2025 745,237.23 $
10/31/2025 797,287.29 $
TOTAL $5,841,894.18
PREPARED BY: George Perez
REVIEWED BY
Finance Director/City Treasurer
10/1/2025 - 10/31/2025 Cash Disbursements
Check # Type Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Org Object PO # Invoice # Description Invoice Amt 4454 EFT 10/3/2025 167 AARDVARK 10150300 51219 250507 INV2500770 Kinetic Breaching Tool $14,038.75 $14,038.75
4455 EFT 10/3/2025 2706 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
INC
10550340 59100 260069 102936 Crossing Guard Services - 8/17/25 - 8/30/25 $16,395.40 $16,395.40
4456 EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039252239 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$64.83
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039261187 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$89.28
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180710 51200 2039261188 DIVISION SUPPLIES $12.23 EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039261189 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$49.04
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180710 51200 2039261190 DIVISION SUPPLIES $5.73 EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039261197 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$68.81
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039265606 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$23.68
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180720 51300 260081 2039265608 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$9.58
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039272501 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$40.59
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039272502 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$20.30
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039272503 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$20.30
EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180710 51200 2039272743 DIVISION SUPPLIES $3.06 EFT 10/3/2025 6469 BAKER & TAYLOR, LLC 10180730 51300 260082 2039273011 PUBLICATIONS, AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS,
BOOKS, TEXTBO
$43.98